HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-06-18 Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session June 18, 2024.
A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, June
18, 2024, by Mayor Robert Simison.
Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug
Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock.
ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE
X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock
Anne Little Roberts X John Overton
_X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener
X Mayor Robert E. Simison
Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is June 18th, 2024,
at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Quick apologies. We are going to make a slight modification to the Consent
Agenda. We are going to take Item 15 and continue it to next week, but with that just
forecasted change, I move that we adopt the agenda as presented.
Strader: Second.
Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it
and the agenda is adopted.
MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES.
CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item]
1. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Work Session
2. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting
3. Approve Minutes of the June 11, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 2 of 47
4. Foxcroft Water Easement Full Release (ESMT-2024-0076)
5. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Emergency Access Easement Number 1
(ESMT-2024-0079)
6. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024-
0082)
7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Pebblebrook Subdivision
(H-2024-0005) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 5725 N.
Meridian Rd.
8. Final Plat for Horse Meadows Subdivision (FP-2024-0006) by KB
Homes, located at 710 B. Black Cat Rd.
9. Development Agreement (Reveille Ridge Subdivision H-2023-0050)
Between City of Meridian, Endurance Holdings LLC (Owner), and
Challenger Development (Developer) for Property Located at 7355 S.
Eagle Rd.
10. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and David's Hope
Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood
Grant Funds
11. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian
Library District Foundation, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood
Grant Funds
12. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridian and the Meridian
Senior Center for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds
13. Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Special Event — Meridian Fine
Arts Festival
14. Resolution No. 24-2459: A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Meridian, Idaho, Setting Forth Certain Findings and Purposes to
Declare Surplus Property and Authorizing the Donation of Certain
Computer and Equipment to Computers for Kids
15. Item Continued to June 25, 2024 Resolution No. 24-2460: A
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City
of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 9.8, Regarding Grant
Management; and Providing an Effective Date
Simison: First up is the Consent Agenda.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 3 of 47
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move that we approve Items 1 through 14 on the Consent Agenda and
continue Item 15 to next week.
Strader: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 15
moved to next week. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye.
Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to.
MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES.
ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item]
Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda.
DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item]
16. Idaho Humane Society Fiscal Year 2025 Budget/Contract
Presentation
Simison: So, we will move on to Item 16, which is Department/Commission Reports.
First up is the Idaho Humane Society of Fiscal Year 2025 budget contract presentation.
Chief, do you want to introduce this at all before we get going? Okay. All right. Then I
will welcome up the Idaho Humane Society.
Gilberg: Good afternoon, Mayor and Members of the City Council. My name is Leann
Gilberg. I am the Chief Financial Officer at the Idaho Humane Society. Also here today
is Dr. Jeff Rosenthal, our CEO. Craig Nixon, who is the director of our Animal Care and
Control Services and Kris Shaffer, who is our chief operating officer. He oversees the
animal care portion of our operations in the shelter. We thank you for having us here
this afternoon. We are proud to serve the citizens of Meridian and we value our
relationship with your city. We also value the positive working relationship that our
officers have with your police officers. So, thank you to the officers for working with us.
Just want to give you a little bit of an idea of what we have been up to at the Idaho
Humane Society in the past year. This is outside of kind of the scope of animal control,
but to give you an idea of who we are and what we are doing, we saved 9,636 pets last
year. Our save rate for dogs is 94 percent. Our save rate for cats was 95 percent and
those numbers allow us to be considered a no kill shelter, which is a great
accomplishment for us. We have been that way for several years and if you have been
around the valley for a long time you will know that that wasn't the case 20 or 30 years
ago. So, we are very proud of that designation. We also reunited 1 ,464 lost pets with
their owners and spayed or neutered 9,833 pets, preventing unwanted litters. We
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 4 of 47
provided veterinary care to 10,418 privately owned pets from predominantly low income
households and that was in our public veterinary hospital and we supplied over 68,000
pounds of food to members of the pet food pantry and Meals on Wheels for Pets
program. So, we do a lot of helping in our community and the majority of these efforts
were funded by charity and our own internal efforts. They were not funded by animal
control activities. We account for those separately. But, again, just thought you would
like to see some of the good things that we are doing. Specifically related to Meridian,
we responded to 1 ,321 calls or incidents last year. We issued 18 citations for animal
code violations, 178 barking dog letters and warnings, 53 issues -- notices for dogs at
large, 95 warnings for other animal code violations. We like to -- I guess what you
would call do community policing. So, we educate when we can, rather than cite. Our
first -- the first thing that we would like to do is try to educate people, so our officers
educated 326 times, rather than citing people in the community. We handled 1 ,691
animals from Meridian. We impounded 1,203 animals and we returned 278 animals to
their owners. We have animals that come to us from Meridian from many different
intake channels. So, I thought I would just give you a preview of a couple -- a few of
those that came in. This is Hurley. He is a ten year old that was brought in by animal
control. He stayed with us for four days and, then, was responded -- or returned to his
owner. These two little guys were brought in for protective custody by animal control
after their owner passed away. They stayed with us for five days and, then, they were
reunited with a family member who took them home. This is Brody. This was a sad
case. This -- these people had to surrender their puppy because he was very ill and
they couldn't afford the care. So, we kept him for eight days. We used grant money to
provide a life-saving surgery for him to remove a foreign object that was lodged in his
intestines and, then, we returned him to his family at no cost to them. And this is Tuna.
She's still with us. She was 22 years -- 22 days old last week. She is going to be with
us for about six weeks. She came in with a broken leg. Animal control brought her in
and she will stay with us until she grows a little bit, gets old enough to be spayed and
get her vaccinations and her microchips and, then, she will be adopted. You can see
that these all came as a result of our relationship with you as -- through our animal
control contract services and as you probably know we provide services for all of Ada
county pretty much, with the exception of Garden City. We only have a sheltering
agreement with them. We don't do any enforcement basically. In relation to the big
picture, to give you an idea of where Meridian falls in that bigger picture, Meridian made
up approximately 27 percent of the population that we serviced last year and counted
for about 22 percent of the calls and your contract fees accounted for just over 22
percent of what we charged for the animal control contracts. For fiscal year '25, as you
can probably see on there, our ask from Meridian is 717,251 dollars. That is an
increase of 7.25 percent, but that is slightly less than the total increase in our cost,
which we are projecting to be about nine percent. We once again allocated the total
cost to the various agencies that we contract with using a consistent methodology that
combines prior years population served and calls that come in from the different
jurisdictions. The ratios remain pretty -- remain pretty consistent over the past few
years. Your portion went down just a tidbit, because we did add Star to the pool. It's a
small addition, but it did drop other organizations' percentage just a tidbit and as I'm
sure you can all relate to, our costs have continued to rise at significant rates over the
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 5 of 47
past few years. Our increases are primarily due to continued pressure on payroll and
the cost associated with the staffing to provide the animal control services. Since the
time -- just to give you an idea -- that the fiscal year '23 budget was presented salaries
for veterinarians have increased over 20 percent. There is a national veterinarian
shortage and trying to get veterinarians anywhere in the valley is a challenge. Rates for
technicians have increased over 15 percent. Animal control officers have increased
over 13 percent. Shelter staff over 12 percent. And the majority of these positions pay
under 20 dollars an hour. So, it's not like we are making people rich working at the
Idaho Humane Society. What this graph shows you is in the past five years the wage
inflation has been significant and that is why you have continued to see your fees go up.
A new animal control officer started at 13 dollars an hour back in fiscal year '20 and they
are up to 20 dollars an hour in the fiscal year '25 budget. And, again, nobody's getting
rich on 20 dollars an hour. Fifty-four percent in five years, 64 percent for a mid level
officer, 65 percent for a supervisor, 38 percent for a dispatcher. Front desk staff from
10.45 to 16.70 five years later. Sixty percent increase. So, as you can see these --
these pay increases have continued to push us to have to increase the fees that we are
charging and in order to be competitive, to be able to hire and retain staff, it's just
necessary for us to do this. The animal control program funds about 41 FTEs. So, 41
full-time employees to service over 500,000 people in the valley and those 41
employees make up about a third of our workforce at IHS. That covers enforcement,
animal care, including veterinary care, customer service representatives. They deal
with people who bring in dogs or come in to redeem their dog. Get them out of jail.
Dispatch. And, then, of course, there is an admin and HR component of that, because,
you know, there is payroll and different things that have to be handled as well. You can
see that the total cost for our services, based on our expenses, because we do a zero
budget, it's just over 3.3 million dollars for fiscal year '25. That's a 9.23 percent increase
from fiscal year '24. And, again, if you go to the next slide, the -- the big dollars are
really in the payroll bucket of that. It's a 7.7 percent increase in payroll. But it's 13
percent for animal control personnel, almost seven percent for shelter personnel. You
see a decrease in the admin side, because we have decreased the top overhead. Dr.
Rosenthal and myself, we have decreased our percentage that is allocated to the
contracts, just because we feel like we have hired a higher level director in the program
now and the operating expenses are up 14 percent, but that's really only about 100,000
dollars over the -- over -- split over, you know, six organizations. So, we really try to
keep our operating expenses, which is your utilities, your insurance, your dog food and
that kind of stuff -- the increases are minimal. Focus our increases on the payroll to
continue to ramp up our staffing. And, then, just one other thing I wanted to touch on is
what we are doing with our officers. Since Director Nixon has come on we have really
ramped up or continued to ramp up -- this is something we have been working on for a
couple years -- our training program for our officers. They go through eight to ten weeks
of field training with an experienced officer. They get certified through NACA, which is
the National Animal Control Association. They do level one and two certifications. They
do continuous online classes, in-service training with the Ada County Prosecutor.
Craig's been having them come in monthly and do training with the officers and we also
do -- they do biweekly team meetings on like -- and training on like report writing and
policies and procedures and so we feel like we are doing our best to provide a quality
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 6 of 47
service for you guys for your community and we do value our relationship and we hope
that you see the value that we bring to your community, because we do. I really enjoy
working with Meridian. So, that is pretty much in a nutshell what I have. If anybody has
any questions.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions?
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. Maybe I can kick a couple things off. Would you mind going back to the
slide on the details for the budget increases. Yeah. If you could just go back a little
more. I think it was -- keep -- keep going. I think a couple more. Yeah.
Gilberg: This?
Strader: I think so. Mr. Mayor. So, help me understand how you -- just for context.
mean this -- I think in my opinion seemed to be a really tough budget year for the City of
Meridian. So, we have increasing costs across the board. We have 18 firefighters that
we need to take on their wages and benefits in a couple fiscal years. We are just really
stretched thin. So, help me understand, you know, how -- how we can get this
percentage increase down. What options are available, if any? Is there a way to
recoup, you know, additional fees from pet owners? Is -- what are you doing to kind of
control your personnel costs? I kind of want to get into some of the meat of that. And
just one comment. I think in the future if you could provide these presentations in
advance of the meeting that would be extremely helpful to us, because we are in the
middle of our budgeting process and we haven't had --
Gilberg: I kind of forgot about it and the request didn't come through and so today I was
like, oh, I probably should have sent this to them. So, yeah, I apologize for that. To
answer your question -- I mean in the big picture of things you guys are actually getting
a pretty good deal. If you look at your percentage of population that we are serving,
which is, you know, almost 27 percent and 22 percent of calls and if you average those
out you are probably actually looking at more like a 24 percent of the total cost base and
you guys are paying 22 -- well, 21.8 percent next year. So, in reality I think that we are
doing -- you guys are getting a pretty fair allocation. Some of the things that we, you
know, could look at -- because from -- as far as the staffing perspective, we are bare
bones staffed. I mean we are trying to get three to four officers on the streets every day.
We have one dispatcher every day. We have got three people working the front desk,
but the number of animals we have coming in and the number of calls that we are
getting -- we can't cut our staffing anymore. You know, if your police wanted to take on
more -- like maybe bringing animals to us or something, we could potentially look at
something like that where we took some of the enforcement off of our plate, but, you
know, when I'm paying officers 18, 19, 20, 21 dollars an hour -- we are having a really
hard time hiring people and keeping them as it is. I just don't -- I have got so much
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 7 of 47
pressure on payroll costs that I'm -- I'm pushing constantly to reduce our like benefit
costs and trying to keep those costs down. There is just not a lot of wiggle room in the
personnel budget and personnel is 75 percent of the animal control budget, 75 percent
of the cost of animal control services is personnel and pay related. We can -- you know,
we can look at it, but I just don't -- I -- off the top of my head I can't think of anything
that's going to reduce that significantly.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. And I think -- again I think that speaks to the importance of providing the
details around your operating budget. You know, you are -- we are outsourcing
basically a city service to you. The City of Meridian has a very conservative financial
philosophy and I think some of the things -- like new vehicles, things like that, we need
to dig into some of those details.
Gilberg: To give you a feel for new vehicles, we -- they cost about a hundred thousand
dollars each. We -- city of Boise bought two vehicles and basically provided them to us
two years ago'ish. We bought one. We, then, bought another one and we got another
one on order, because the ones that we have literally have over 300,000 miles on them.
Two of them that we have on the road still are ones that we got from your animal control
when we took it over. We bought two of your guys' vehicles and we are still running
them. So, they are kind of like -- can we, please, get something that's more reliable.
So, after this round that I just ordered this last one, I think we are probably done
purchasing vehicles for a while, but I don't even bill those out in the contracts every
year. I split it over three years. So, the portion of those costs that you are paying -- you
are paying 20 percent of a hundred thousand dollar vehicle over three years. So, it's
pretty small dollars.
Strader: Mr. -- Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. I -- you know, so I -- I don't know. I just want to go through and
understand the history, but I think, you know, we had a 4.52 percent increase year over
year of the previous year, then, it was a 7.18 percent increase year over year. This is
close to a seven percent increase. Yeah. I saw it -- some of the -- in some e-mail
history I quickly glanced at it -- it did say something like the goal is to like pay
employees a livable wage. I want to make sure we are paying employees a market
wage. I think that that's an important piece of understanding.
Gilberg: I completely agree with you and if we go to that next slide and just look at it,
I'm not sure that any of those wages are what I would consider out of market. I mean
McDonald's is hiring for 15 dollars an hour and our front desk staff on average are
making 14.89, 15.64 right now. We are bumping it to 16.70 and that's average. That's
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 8 of 47
the brand new person who just started and the supervisor who has been there for two
years. So, out of, you know, the -- of the four or five people that are -- work in that
department that's -- that is an average. So, I mean they are starting at 14 dollars an
hour.
Strader: Okay. So, it sounds like from your perspective the -- really the only option
available is if our police department takes on kind of an increased burden that -- that
doesn't sound like us.
Gilberg: Because I can't think of -- I mean, Craig, any suggestions?
Nixon: So -- so, this is a consolidated contract, even though it doesn't come in as a
consolidated contract among all the different municipalities in Ada county. So,
everyone's sort of buying into the same system, the same service levels and they are all
paying a proportional share. So, that benefits you tremendously. The -- the -- the -- the
-- Leann mentioned bringing on Star. So, that -- that proves the power of not duplicating
services and rather spreading the cost out among all the different communities. One of
the issues that occurs, however, when we get into individual negotiations is that
because it is a combined contract we have a lot less room to change things, because
everybody else is also budgeting in under that service contract. So, a number of years
ago before we moved to a two facility model, we met with all of the municipalities for a
year before making some major changes to the animal control contract. One of the
things that was discussed at that time was actually a suggestion of ours is to form a --
kind of a joint powers agreement among the different municipalities, so that these sort of
details could be worked out earlier in the year amongst the entire group, because what
happens in Meridian actually impacts Boise and impacts Kuna and vice-versa, so it's
very hard for us to sort of individualize -- craft a -- kind of a -- kind of a -- an a la carte
contract with one community, Garden City, being really the only one right now that -- that
has that, but they are doing all the enforcement. So, that's something to consider and
that -- this is one of those services that doesn't make sense for a community to do on
their own, because the cost, then, just completely skyrockets. It's -- it's something that
works because all the communities are buying in and they are only buying a portion of
each employee versus having to employ a -- you know, buy -- buy the entire employee.
So, I think one of the things that could be explored in future years would be greater
coordination among all the different communities, rather than us individually going out
and, you know, pitching these -- these contracts individually. We had a consolidated
contract for a couple years actually where everybody signed on. That's gone by the
wayside.
Strader: Thanks. That's -- that's it for now. Thank you.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 9 of 47
Cavener: Mr. Rosenthal, I may have another quick question that you may be really well
equipped to answer for me. If we could jump back one more slide. It -- it's what kind of
piqued my interest, which was -- yeah. I think calls by calendar year and so when I look
at this I look at fiscal year '20, 1,800 calls. Fiscal year '23 1,300 calls. Our population
has grown a lot since then. I'm just curious kind of from your expertise what do you
attribute with a growing population why you are receiving less calls for service?
Rosenthal: Yeah. My understanding -- and maybe Director Nixon can actually expand
on this, is the -- the -- I believe what happened is the way we collected calls changed,
the methodology for reporting a call --
Gilberg: And the staffing that was handling the calls when we were having a transition
between directors, they kind of changed the way that they were recording calls that
were coming in. I believe that we corrected that and changed it going forward. They
were not capturing all the calls that were coming in, so everybody across the board had
a decrease. So, if you were to look at -- I mean if -- you can see it there that you guys
weren't the only ones that had a decrease, because the total number of calls went down
as well.
Nixon: Additionally, my recollection is also during that time period we moved to a
certain -- a certain number of calls for particularly barking dogs and certain nuisance
responses being handled in a slightly different way than a door-to-door -- more of an
online and a -- by a phone methodology. So, they are not -- and, unfortunately, they are
not directly comparable from these numbers.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: I guess, then, that brings the question are there other numbers that are on
here that maybe shouldn't be comparable, then, that have been included as --
Nixon: No. I think that's the only thing that we ever changed.
Cavener: Okay. And then -- Mr. Mayor.
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Do you know -- because it's not reflected here -- what is the total calls for
service that you provided to all jurisdictions?
Nixon: You know, that's 5,934, 1 believe.
Cavener: If it's on there and I missed it. I'm really -- really sorry.
Nixon: You know, it's -- it's down there -- the third from the bottom.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 10 of 47
Cavener: Oh. Thank you very much. I totally missed that one. Thank you. I think
that's good for me. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Gilberg: Mr. Mayor, may I just add -- I do apologize that this did not get to you guys
earlier. We did submit a budget on January 31st, but I'm not sure who that went to. It
may not have made it to the Council, but I will definitely make sure you get it earlier in
the future.
Simison: We received the budget. I think it's the presentation with all the backup
information. Councilman Overton, did you have a question? Sorry. I heard your voice.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, I was going to ask one question. How is our increase in relation to
the increases to the other cities on your contracts?
Gilberg: It's about average. It might -- I think it's a little bit lower than some and it might
be a little bit higher than like -- I think equals like 5.7 percent and you guys were seven
point something percent. I would have to go look, but if you look at the total increase in
the total contract, it's nine. The contract income is going up nine percent and yours is
only going up seven percent. So, you got -- I mean, again, I feel like Meridian is getting
a pretty fair allocation.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe one more.
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: And because this is -- to, you know, I think kind of the Mayor's point, we get
the numbers and part of the presentation is to get the story to help us understand and
so, I apologize, this may come across as an ignorant question, but I might need you to
walk me through it, because -- I think you heard Council Member Strader speak to it.
Obviously we are -- we are very sympathetic to cities about being able to pay, you know,
market wage wages and so that is a consideration certainly that you guys are trying to --
to explore and so I look at it little over 500 bucks per call. Meridian or region wide,
about 12, 13 -- almost 13,000 dollars a week for Meridian, which if you are paying
somebody 21 dollars an hour -- I'm just trying to figure out what -- I understand -- what --
what is -- what is the City of Meridian taxpayer is going to pay 500 and something
dollars per call. Where is that money going to?
Gilberg: Councilman and Mayor, I -- I completely understand where you are going with
that and let me give you a little bit better background of what that includes. It's not only
the officers going out on the calls, there is the people who sit at the front desk. There is
the veterinarians who have to spade and neuter and vaccinate the animals that come in.
We don't -- and we split -- just so you know, like Doorman, that facility, since we moved
part of our operations into our Bird Street facility, is now allocated 60 percent to the
animal control contracts and we pay 40 percent of it. That's based on -- consistently
and we update every year. The number of animals that we bring in, as like owner
surrenders or transfers in versus what's brought in through what we consider to be
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 11 of 47
animal control-related activities. So, for an animal control officer the contracts are
covering a hundred percent. They are covering a hundred percent of their costs. They
are covering a hundred percent of their vehicles. Their animal control contracts are also
covering a hundred percent of the dispatchers and the front desk staff. They are only
covering 60 percent of the kennel workers who take care of the animals. A portion of
the -- an allocated portion of the veterinarians and the technicians. They are paying a
portion of like our media, like I think a third or something like that of our media person,
because we are constantly dealing with the angry person who is mad about something
that happened with an animal control officer and they are having to deal with that and so
-- because I pro rata any administrative type costs a third to animal control and two-
thirds to IHS and that's based on the fact that about a third of our employees are related
to the animal control functions if you do it on an FTE basis. So, besides the actual
salaries, there is the uniforms, there is the insurance, there is the -- the power, there is
the vehicle costs -- basically everything that you would need to run an animal control
operation stand alone is what we put into that bucket. Some of it a hundred percent,
some of it on a pro rata basis. Does that kind of answer your question?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: It provides I think a good explanation to all the -- the resources that are
involved. I guess I am still struggling to -- because it's not just -- the Meridian portion
that's paying for that, it's -- it's the totality of all of the users that are contributing to that
and so you have got -- again political science majors are not great at math -- 114 calls a
week. We will split that by five hundred -- five hundred dollars -- that's Iowball for a call.
So, that's 57,000 dollars a week in operations.
Gilberg: I mean you -- you have to also take into consideration that a call doesn't
necessarily equate to an animal. So, besides the calls we also have -- sorry. Give me
just a second here. So, the -- the animals serviced -- so, you know, you look at -- we
brought in -- we handled seven -- almost 1,700 animals for Meridian and when I say
handle the animals that was bringing them in, feeding them, vaccinating them, because
you can't keep them in a shelter if they are not vaccinated. Any emergent medical care,
whatever. So, there is 1,700 from Meridian. Multiply that by five. So, you know, that's
almost 10,000 animals that are taken care of. Some of them for a day, some of them for
ten days. So, there is that cost, too. There is the animal cost. So, it's not -- you can't
just really calculate it based on calls. Kind of have to also look at animal service,
because they are kind of two different buckets. I can go out on a call for a vicious dog
and that animal may never enter the shelter.
Cavener: Sure.
Gilberg: So, there is kind of two different buckets that you are covering.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 12 of 47
Cavener: Yeah. I think that's where probably some of these questions are coming from
is I'm responding to the information that you are giving us to a kind of essentially justify
the request that you are making and so I'm trying to do the math in my head about --
you want to pay your people more, which we support, but not knowing all of these things
and not having that information provided to us, I'm trying to figure out where is the rest
of the money going and I'm -- I'm -- that's what I'm trying -- that's where some of these
questions are coming. I'm just trying to figure it out. I don't think anyone's playing hide
the ball, it's just we haven't been educated about this and we -- we are very protective of
the taxpayer dollars, as I know you are aware of, and so making sure that we -- I want
to be able -- if -- if I'm a citizen and I see it's costing me as a City of Meridian taxpayer
12,846 dollars a week and there is going to be 25 calls in Meridian, they are going to
ask me why am I okay with that?
Rosenthal: Council Member, I -- I appreciate the frustration, because I have listened to
this sort of frustration for 24 years from council members, because animal control
services and shelter services is really expensive -- almost shockingly expensive for
small communities. What would assure the Meridian taxpayer is a simple comparison
to virtually any peer community across the United States that has this population and
has to do this work on their own with their own animal shelter, because that number is
going to be in the millions, not sub one millions, but for the City of Meridian to run an
animal control program and an animal shelter, which I think everyone would agree every
community of this size is going to have to have animal control services. You can't just
not have it. And in previous years when I -- when I did some of these presentations I
would frequently provide those matrix and we would be happy to do a survey of peer
communities to Meridian so you could compare, hey, is Meridian getting a good deal
versus other communities across the United States that have this population base and I
think you would find that that would be very reassuring to you and the Council Members
that you are getting the best possible deal. I would be surprised if we found many, if
any, communities that are comparable to Meridian that are paying less.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: And, Dr. Rosenthal, I appreciate that and -- and, frankly, I'm not looking for a
deal. I -- I want to be able to explain to my boss why we are spending this money that
we are -- and what -- what we are getting in return and this is where the challenge is
that the matrix that are provided to us today to justify the request, which is a fairly large
increase from when this started, makes it hard for me to feel comfortable that I could
explain to them why this was justified and so that's -- I'm not looking for -- not looking to
you for a Groupon or a discount code, we want to pay what is fair and it came back to
we want to make sure that your staff -- I'm a firm believer -- we want to make sure that
our Meridian employees are paid not just living wages, but wages that they can be
proud of, that I can be proud of. I know you want that for your people, too. It's not
about that. It's helping us understand. You are the experts. We are not. And if we are
not provided the information I can't -- I can't just say it's nice to meet you, Leann. Nice
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 13 of 47
to meet you, Dr. Rosenthal, thanks for being here. Whatever you are telling us I'm just
going to say Dr. Rosenthal said it was a good deal, so it should be okay, taxpayers.
can't do that.
Gilberg: I think part of the challenge is that --
Rosenthal: We can provide any more information that you require.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: I understand the concerns expressed by our two other councilmen, but I
remember when we started this contract and I stood where you are and I pitched it to
the city as a member of the police department. The very first time we handed over the
two animal control vans and we put the cost analysis in front of City Council at that time
on the three to five million dollar building we would have to build and staff and run to
have anything close to what you provided to the entire community. I think trying to
break that cost down into something as simple as a -- how much per call for service
doesn't tell the whole story, just as it wouldn't tell the whole story if we took the cost of a
police budget and divided it up between the police calls for service, because there is so
much more that goes on behind the scenes. I think you don't -- maybe you don't spell it
out enough, all the things and the time you do with the shelter, all the pets that you take
in that has nothing to do with a call for service that are dropped off. All the animals that
are -- that are dropped off from people in other communities belong to owners in
Meridian. The animals that are found in Meridian that belong to owners in other parts of
the city or other cities that you guys take the time to take care of, feed, handle and find
their owners and get them back to. The idea is you have a very comprehensive
approach that goes far beyond just the call for service and how you handle these
animals.
Rosenthal: Thank you, Councilman Overton. I also add that in recent years moving
more and more to our community policing model, one of the frustrations we have is the
-- the fact of the matter is that when we go out on a call and we don't issue a citation
and we work on owner education and we are providing resources or providing problem
solving and mediating between angry people, because largely what we are doing is --
often has somewhat less to do with the animal that you might suspect and more to do
with neighbors that are at war with each other. This is actually a longer, more time
consuming, resource intensive in that way, because time is money process. So, back in
the day we used to very much pound on all these citations we have issued and -- and
so forth and what I would encourage you to think about is when we go out and do these
warnings they are -- they are -- they are -- it's a lot longer and more expensive a
process, quite frankly, than just issuing the citation and driving away. But, you know,
piling up more work on the legal folks here, it's not worth it and actually not solving
problems getting people to get along and, you know, if we go out and we spend the time
working with people and figuring out what the problem is and how can we just get this
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 14 of 47
solved and actually solve the problem for the long term, so we are not going out time
after time after time and not getting anywhere and not really accomplishing what I think
you folks want, which is this is all about making the community more harmonious.
Animals are an integral part of it and for the most part they are force for good, but
sometimes they are force of division and decreasing quality of life issues. So, that's one
may -- possibly part of the frustration is when you look at matrix they don't necessarily,
as Councilman Overton is sort of suggesting, indicate the full scope of it all and what the
City of Meridian is getting actually is, essentially, their own animal shelter. It's a portion
of it. Instead of buying their own animal shelter they are basically paying for a portion of
it and -- and I think the cost savings are -- are indisputable really.
Gilberg: Mr. Mayor and Councilmen, even more recently than what Councilman
Overton was referring to when IHS originally took on the contract, around 2021 1 believe
when we were moving into our other facility and there was going to be an increase in
the cost because of the allocation of the Dorman facility, Meridian did a very in-depth
analysis of what the cost would be to do their own shelter and I -- they quickly
determined that it was much more cost effective to continue to contract with IHS. If that
helps.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Just to chime in, I know the Finance Department is willing to -- as they do for
all of our budgeting requests -- they are happy to update that analysis for us each year
that it does show a cost savings, but they will be happy to provide that. I think it would
be very helpful to sort of breakdown the cost per call for future information, just the cost
per call, what percentage of that is allocated to -- to different, you know, personnel,
overhead, whatever it is and, then, I think if you could compare Meridian to the other
cities on that basis I think that would be helpful for us, so that we can kind of understand
how -- how that's kind of playing out.
Gilberg: Council Woman, when you say compared to other cities, are you talking about
financially or calls, because we -- we issue a report every January and, again, I can get
you a copy of that that shows all the different contracting agencies and what calls they
have had and how many animals we have handled and it has all of those in it and we
issue that every January.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. I -- I think all the information is helpful, but I think, you know, breaking
down the cost per call per city I think would be also enlightening for us, so that we can
see, you know, if -- I understand how you are sort of -- you are -- you are allocating --
you are trying to allocate your contract between the different cities it sounds like based
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 15 of 47
on the volume; right? But I think it would be helpful to double check, you know, is
Meridian getting a good rate on a per call kind of basis compared to the other cities.
Any kind of those sort of matrix I think are helpful and, -- you know, I mean I get it, the the personnel costs -- like we really do understand, because we are facing a similar we face similar dilemmas here, especially with inflation, but, you know, again, like we
have to do the same thing, like we are really stretching to control our own costs in every
kind of facets. So, you know, I expect -- I expect you all to do the same and if you
provide us more detailed information about your operating budget, then, that allows us
to, you know, provide helpful suggestions as well.
Gilberg: I do appreciate that and we can do better with that. One of the parameters
that -- typically when we do these type of comparisons is cost per capita and you will
see that at the bottom of -- I don't know what page it is. It's a page with the Meridian
cost share portions. You can see that your cost in fiscal year '20 was $4.43 per capita.
In fiscal year '23 it was $4.51 per capita and I'm guessing it's going to be right around
that -- it says 4.82 in fiscal year '24, but that's without increasing the population base,
because we didn't have the updated population numbers. So, the cost per capita has
continued to stay relatively stable.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. It's just -- I don't -- and don't take this wrong way. I don't really trust that
matrix in isolation, because to Councilman Cavener's point, your calls for Meridian --
now, granted, some methodology has changed, so I don't fully understand that, but if
Meridian residents are using your facilities less than I would actually expect the cost per
capita to be going down --
Gilberg: If our costs went down.
Strader: If your cost went down. Yeah. But I mean, again, it's like our population is
going up; right? Like our population has expanded dramatically. So, I would still expect
the cost per capita to start going down, because we are spreading a bunch of overhead
across a bigger base of population. So, I -- I don't know, I'm a little bit -- I -- I guess I
just -- I don't know if I want to say they are like red flags. So, I just -- I see some
concerns about help me understand the calls that you are actually getting. Why -- why
have those gone down compared to where they were and -- and try to compare on
some kind of a basis that's fair, which I think cost per call would make sense -- and I
don't even know what the answer is, I just want to see it. You know, what's the cost per
call per city, break that down into some different components and provide a more
detailed operating budget. I mean that would be very helpful. You know, I sympathize,
I mean driving a vehicle 300,000 miles stinks, you know. Strader family uses Mint
Mobile and I have got a computer that I'm -- it's ten years old and I'm hoping to make it
to 15, you know, so I get it. But, you know, we also have to -- we all have to control our
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 16 of 47
costs in this environment. I mean and the taxes -- to Luke's point, it's like the taxpayers
are going to ask us these questions, so we need have a good answer. Thanks.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just one more if I may.
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Along with that information I think it would also be good to get an average call
time. What is the response time to Meridian and how does that compare with the rest of
the region. That was something I had real concerns with about a number of years ago.
I was getting a lot of complaints. I haven't got those anymore, so my hope is, hey, you
guys have addressed that and it's went down. Again, having less calls for Meridian than
you had maybe four or five years ago is probably also -- freed some of that capacity up,
but I'm -- I'm very interested in understanding -- to -- to Dr. Rosenthal's point, if we all
are in this together, then, I want to make sure that our Meridian residents are getting the
same type of response as our neighbors in Boise, as our neighbors in Star and Eagle,
that we are -- we are all getting the same level of service if we are all being asked to
pay the same amount.
Gilberg: We -- we do provide that information monthly.
Simison: Council, any additional questions? All right. Thank you very much.
Appreciate you being here.
Gilberg: Thank you.
17. Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Update and Fiscal Year 2025 Budget
Request
Simison: Next item up is Item 17, which is Valley Regional Transit update and fiscal
year 2025 budget request. Welcome, Elaine, to the podium.
Clegg: Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here and -- and I have behind me Kate Dahl,
who is our principal planner, somebody -- the supervisor of Stephen Hunt, gave him a
vacation and he is off on his way to Europe. So, he is not here to help us today. But
Kate will fill in very well I'm certain. Really appreciate the opportunity to come talk to
you about our budget. Sorry, I'm trying to -- there we go. So, I'm going to give you an
overview of the budget process that we follow, a little overview of VRT, what we have
been up to, the services that you all get from us, the ridership that -- that corresponds
with that and, then, go into our budget request. So, the 2025 budget request -- and you
should have received these numbers some time ago, but -- oops. I went the wrong
direction. There we go. You did not receive this presentation and next year we will try
to get it to you earlier. Did want to talk a little bit about the timing of the process and
some changes that we have instituted. Used to be that you would simply get the budget
request and not much else. I sent a letter to all of you in April. I'm hoping that next year
will come in in March and in that letter tried to give an overview of the things that -- not
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 17 of 47
just Valley Regional Transit does overall, but how it impacts Meridian specifically. Then
shared the preliminary funding request and now we are in the discussions about that.
You will finalize your budget. One of the things -- another thing that we have changed
this year is as soon as you finalize your budget and send it to certification we know what
number is in it, we will send a cooperative agreement draft and ask that you finalize that
once your budget is certified, so that we actually have a certified budget before the
fiscal year starts, instead of after. Would be nice. So, an overview of what we do. VRT
has 43 direct staff and 149 contract staff. We have four facilities, including the
administrative offices here in Meridian. The base in Boise at the airport at Orchard and
in Canyon county at Happy Day and, then, of course, Main Street station in downtown
Boise. We have a fleet of 45 large buses and 39 smaller buses. We also have a fleet of
25 vans and 16 support vehicles. We have increased ridership since COVID by 19
percent. As of last year, if we look at this year's numbers, we are confident that by the
end of 2024 we will be above the numbers that we had pre-COVID. Really really
excited about that. We provide fixed route services and on-demand services. I will talk
about those. We also provide paratransit services to persons with disabilities and this
year we started a new service called Beyond Access, which is for both older adults and
persons with disabilities who are outside the access service zone. Again, really excited
about that. Other things that particularly are of interest in Meridian are The Village van,
the Rides to Wellness, some of the transit connections and Lyft Late Night rides, as well
as opportunities to participate in our transportation demand program, which allows
employers to buy passes for all of their -- all of their employees. So, a week and a half
ago he did a big service change. Some of you may have noticed. We have new signs
everywhere. But most importantly we have consolidated services into more frequent
services in the places where we know we have people. We have increased trips
between Meridian and Nampa and Boise. We -- I will show you in a minute why we are
really excited about those and what we think they will do and we have upgraded our
branding -- new sign blades and information holders at all of our stops. So, these are
the new sign blades. Some of you may have seen them on some of the stops around
town. Next to it is an information sheet. It used to be when you came to a stop you
maybe saw the sign. There was no other information. Every stop now has this
information sheet, which tells you what route is being served there or routes and the
stops along that route. Gives you a QR code to go for more information and tells you
what the fair is, all of those things. This is a really exciting upgrade that we are pretty
proud of in the system. We have got a lot of good feedback already. In addition -- and
you will see this in just a minute -- we redesigned all of the brochures. Those brochures
also have a lot more information on them. So, one quick thing about this sign. You will
notice that it has the stop ID number. Previously if you were out of stop and you called
customer service you had to try to explain to the person where you were. Let's see. I'm
at the corner of -- I think it's south and east. Now you just say, oh, I'm at AB211 and
customer service says, oh, I know exactly where you are. It's really really helpful. The
routes are shown by color according to frequencies. So, anything in green comes every
15 minutes at least four hours a day, most of them six hours a day. Anything in white
and blue comes either 30 -- every 30 minutes or every 60 minutes, but all day and
anything in purple is peak hour only. So, again, at a glance you can say here is -- her is
what kind of I can expect at this stop. Meridian used to have the Route 30. Still does.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 18 of 47
We have changed it up a little. It also has the 40, the 42 and the 2045. What's not on
this one -- and I apologize we missed that new route that serves between Town Square
Mall in The Village. Route 24. We will talk about it. And, then, all of these specialized
services, which also move a lot of people around Meridian. Here is an example of the
new brochures, new timetables, new maps that show all of the stops. The old maps
didn't used to show that. Some points of interest along the way on each of the routes.
Then on the other side is information about how to use the bus system. That's a lot
more detailed than we used to have. So, Route 30 statistics. In FY-24 or '23 there
were 3,000 boardings. It's growing. It's been a little slow, but given how it started with
COVID and everything we are actually pretty pleased with it. I'm sorry. FY-25 is the
3,000 boardings and I will explain to you why that's lower. FY-23, which is the year we
have final numbers for, we had 5,219 boardings and, again, as I say, that's been
growing maybe a little lower than we would like, but getting there. With the service
change we combined it in a sense with the 45 -- the 45 now goes all the way from
downtown Boise to downtown Nampa. It follows the Route 30 through the middle of
Meridian and between the Route 30 and the Route 45 there is service every half hour,
every 30 minutes for five and a half hours a day. That's a big change. We think overall
in aggregate that there will be an increase between the two routes of 40 -- 52 percent in
boardings and we expect a lot of those to be in Meridian itself. So, last year the Route
45 had also had about 5,200 boardings. With the new Route 45 combined with the 30,
again, in aggregate the two will be 16,000 boardings a year according to our projections
and that ridership increase is pretty dramatic and we are excited about this. What the
Route 45 does is offer residents of Meridian direct access to CWI in downtown Boise in
ways that they didn't used to have it. It would take -- transfer most cases to get too
many of those places. The Route 24 is the new route that is -- serves between Town
Square Mall and The Village. This is service hours that used to be fully within Boise.
Oh, I might note before we leave this, so you will notice that your service assessment is
actually down a little bit and that's because we moved trips to the Route 45, which also
is paid for by both city of Boise, CWI, and the city of Nampa, as well as Meridian and so
your share of your costs on the 45 went down. The 24 is mostly within Boise. It is
service that used to be fully paid for by Boise and went in the West Valley neighborhood
from the Town Square Mall to the Idaho State campus. We are now serving that
campus from the Chinden route and the Glenwood route and instead move this service
east-west between the Town Square Mall and The Village. It will run every hour all day.
So, it's not real frequent service, but, again, it's consistent service for residents of City of
Meridian who need to get into Boise. Once you get to the Town Square Mall you can
see there are connections to routes that go all over the city. So, again, pretty excited
about this one. We expect a lot of boardings on this route. We will see if it comes
through, but we expect this route to perform really well. The Route 40 is an express
route between cities that goes from Happy Day Transit Center to downtown Boise.
Ridership on this route has been increasing over the last number of years and with this
change we expect it to increase even more from 14,000 to almost 20,000. It is -- sorry.
I'm looking. There is a -- a number on here that I want to share. Thirty percent --
excuse me -- of the households who will be served by this route, 14 -- there is 14,700
households within half a mile of it and 21 percent of those only have one car, while -- or
37 percent of those only have one car, 21 percent of those live in poverty. That's why
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 19 of 47
this route is such an important one and as you can see we are expecting a 38 percent
increase in ridership with the redesign of this route and its ability now to reach so many
destinations that we know people are looking to get to. Route 42 is also redesigned and
it is now a local all day service from Happy Day all the way into downtown Boise. Again,
citizens on the south side of Meridian have not had that all day service into either city
previously and while it's only once an hour, just the consistency of it at least begins to let
people begin to plan to use it. Because of those changes we expect a 41 percent
increase in ridership on this redesigned route. So, the services that are serving
Meridian are the ones that we really expect to see the highest increases in ridership on
in many cases, other than the Fairview frequent route, which went to 15 minute service
inside the city of Boise. The routes in Meridian are the ones that are seeing -- projected
to have the highest increases. Access is a service for persons with disabilities. It's a
curb-to-curb service -- or, actually, a door-to-door service. Excuse me. That is a
guaranteed ride. If you live within three-quarters of a mile of a fixed route and with the
changes now you have more service area within the City of Meridian that is eligible for
this. We have a number of riders signed up in Meridian. We haven't seen a lot of
uptake yet. So, one of the things we have been talking about is what we can do to
market this service to the people who really need it, because it is one that could be very
useful to the people within that area who do need it. Our Beyond Access Service is one
that replaces previously -- service that was previously provided by Harvest and a small
amount of service that was provided in Meridian by SHIP or Supportive Housing
Services program. Those -- together those two programs provided 30 -- together those
programs, as well as other senior centers across the valley and metro community
services provided 31 ,000 trips last year. So, the changes this year are that Valley
Regional Transit is directly operating the services that used to be provided by Harvest
and by SHIP. The Meridian senior centers you will see in a minute still provides
separate service on its own. We also provide services that used to be provided by the
Star Senior Center, the Eagle Senior Center and Metro Community Services is the
partner in this. The result of that instead of having very discrete, small service areas is
that a person can travel all the way from southeast Boise to almost Parma on this
service that previously wasn't available. The beauty for Meridian being right in the
middle of the valley is now your residents have access to almost anywhere in the valley
on this service. It is a qualified service. You have to be an older adult or a person with
disabilities, but if you are qualified and you live outside of access -- regular access
service area, you can use the Beyond Access services. So far we have provided since
January 14,467 rides on this service, 3,335 of those have been within Meridian. So,
again, pretty excited about this service. Meridian Senior Center continues to -- to
provide services in -- to seniors in Meridian. You don't pay for any of that. Area Agency
on Aging provides the local match, which is about 18,000 dollars -- a little more than
18,000 and Valley Regional Transit provides the federal match for that, which is 73,000.
So, you get almost 90,000 dollars' worth of services from this that moves older adults
around the city. Last year there were a little over 8,000 boardings. Lyft Late Night is a
service for particularly service workers. It's an income qualified service. If you can get
to or from work on a regular fixed route bus you can -- and you qualify income wise,
you can use this service to get a Lyft home or two for only three dollars if it's anywhere
within the service area shown. The red outline is an addition to the service area that we
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 20 of 47
made with these changes. Recognizing that there are a lot of service employers along
that Overland corridor and so this new service will -- will serve that corridor we think
quite well. Here is an overall view of the ridership and the ridership as it was
experienced in Meridian on the routes that serve you. So, in 2023 out of 112,000 total
rides on the services that somehow touch Meridian, almost 40,000 of those rides were
Meridian residents. We think you are getting a pretty good deal for the services that you
are paying for. So, our budget request this year. Our assessment is broken down in
four different ways. The general assessment is regional overhead. That pays for the
administrative services, planning, those kinds of things that happen over at this office
here in Meridian. As you can see your general assessment actually went down a little
bit last year, even though your population grew, because it is a calculation based on
both population and service miles and service hours and because of the change in
service hours on the 30 and the reduction there you guys are actually going to pay just
a little bit less for that. Your service assessment similarly went down because of -- for
those same reasons. The capital assessment -- we don't have a lot of rolling stock or
other capital that we are buying this year. I would note that we are trying to -- I'm trying
to figure out a way to normalize the capital assessment, so it isn't so lumpy. It's down a
little bit this year. One would expect it will be up next year as a -- as a result. So, over
this next planning year I'm working with staff to see if we can figure out a way to
normalize that. Where there is an increase is in the services. That's the Beyond
Access, Rides to Wellness, the rides to the VA, the VA shuttle and, sorry, there is one
other that's included in that and I'm forgetting what it is. Oh, the medical transportation.
All of those have increased kind of dramatically, frankly, this year because of the
increases we have seen in cost. We think we have done a really good job trying to
keep costs down everywhere we could. This is one place -- we had to eat some of
those increases this year. We would expect that again to normalize next year because
we have been able to -- we think to absorb what those increases will be with this -- this
request this year. Overall we are only asking for a one percent increase from the City of
Meridian. We think the value that you are getting for our services is good. We are
excited about the future. We think that with the increases we expect in ridership that
value will grow without asking for more money, at least this year. Not very much more
money. We hope in the future that if you are interested we will be able to grow because
we have negotiated with you additional services, not because our costs go up, but
because you actually get more out of it. So, with that our request this year is 880,293
dollars and we are hopeful that if you have any questions we can answer them.
Simison: Thank you, Elaine. Council, any questions?
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Elaine, thank you. That was a fantastic presentation and I'm -- I'm really
happy to see all the positive changes that you have done with VRT over this past year.
Just the simple changes on the signs and how much that's going to help people know
where they are at, know where they are going, know what's available. Seeing these
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 21 of 47
ridership numbers continue to grow -- I'm always thinking about transportation and
knowing that as those ridership numbers continue to grow that means future -- or less
vehicles on our roadways at a time when those numbers are climbing at a steady rate.
So, I'm glad to see that that's happening. I also appreciate -- we have talked before
about how you are modifying those routes to try to meet the areas as we are building
and some of our heavier and more denser areas you are already working on those
routes to service those areas and I think it's a fantastic job and I appreciate it very
much.
Clegg: Thank you.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Thank you. And first let me say congratulations on your nomination. It's a
Senate confirmed position; right?
Clegg: Thank you. Yeah. That Senate confirmation process could be a bugger, but
hopefully --
Taylor: Yeah.
Clegg: -- it will go well.
Taylor: Well, I spent five years as a Senate staffer, so I know. Good luck. It is the
presidential election year, so you might be hanging out there for a while, but I think it's
great and congratulations. Hopefully it ends well for you. A couple questions. I -- I just
had on the special -- the how -- how do we pay for the Beyond Access program? And,
then, is that part of the -- if you want -- could you go to that last slide that you were on.
So, the special assessment line where it says it's negotiated, can you just explain what
that is? And, then, like some of these programs, like Beyond Access is that -- is that
part of that budget line and just kind of -- if you can elaborate a little bit on that.
Clegg: I will and I don't know that I have too much more detail than what I can tell you
in terms of what it is -- is included in that, but -- as well. So, the negotiated special
assessment includes Beyond Access. Beyond Access is paid for in part by the Area
Agency on Aging. We get a grant from them. Our grant this year was down 100,000
dollars overall across all of Ada county -- Ada and Canyon counties, frankly, and so part
of what you are doing is helping make up that difference. Part of that comes from the
feds, part of that from the state. But without -- without the full local match we would not
be able to maximize the federal money that we have and provide as much service as
we would otherwise. Rides to Wellness is paid for by the service -- the healthcare
service providers and it's seen a dramatic increase in ridership and we are not asking
you for any more money for that, but as a result some of the rides that -- that might have
gone on it are going to be on access to the VA service and the medical transportation
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 22 of 47
services, which you do help pay for. All of those have gone up -- not because -- not just
because the costs are up, but because the number of rides we are providing is up.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: One more follow up. So, one thing that's kind of interesting -- and I think I'm
seeing this a little bit in some of these new services. One of the challenges with a
public transportation system is the convenience for people. I lived in Washington DC
that had wonderful -- but it was still really inconvenient; right? I rode the -- I got on a
bus, took me to the Metro. In the summer I would just sweat in the humidity. It was
lovely. Great system, you know, still kind of inconvenient. Obviously, that's one of the
challenges probably with ridership is the -- you know, if you live close to walk that's
great, but a lot of people don't. So, one thing I have -- I like what I'm seeing is like the
late night lift guaranteed, you know, that's -- I think that is really smart kind of an
innovative approach. Some of these other programs -- because I see to me the future
of public transportation, I -- it's hard for me to envision the public transportation system
that we have today in 20 years being the same. I see almost like a switch where
instead of trying to get people places, services, jobs, groceries, things are being brought
to people, so I think supplementing a transportation system that focuses on where the
people live, main quarters, as many people as you can, but, then, connecting people to
the -- the routes with these sort of innovative approaches I guess. So, I guess my
question is -- I'm fascinated with the idea of leveraging Lyft, Uber, other rideshare
services as a way to get people to that, because I think that would really dramatically
help. Like -- I mean if I could call an Uber and I could get to a bus station in a few
minutes and know that I'm going to get there a few minutes before and it picked me up
and take me, I would be much more likely to use it. So, could you speak to that a little
bit and kind of some of your thinking and -- and where things are going with that?
Clegg: Sure. So, if -- if I had my own computer with me I would -- I would slip to a slide
from another slide deck. The city of Boise was able to go after a grant and I believe that
grant was -- was through United Way, but I -- I may be wrong. I can't remember for
sure. And with that grant and some money from the city of Boise -- in addition to Lyft,
Late Night in Boise, we also offer Lyft Connections and Lyft Connection is for two dollars
up to an eight dollar ride total, you are guaranteed to be picked up within a five minute
walk of wherever you are and dropped off at the nearest large transit stop. Not just any
transit stop. We have got 57 in the Boise system that we have chosen. That service
used to be very narrow. When we made this service change we more than doubled the
service area of -- of the Lyft Connections and as a result we are already seeing a big
update -- uptick in use getting from wherever you are to the convenient transit. So,
then, you can take the rest of your ride. I do see that as an opportunity in the City of
Meridian, especially as we have begun offering these more robust fixed route services,
at least they run all day, those kinds of things. I think we would -- we would be happy to
work with you and your staff to see if there is a similar grant that we could get that -- that
might start something similar to that in Meridian if you guys are interested.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 23 of 47
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: I mean I -- I'm always interested to see the information and evaluate it. I think
it could never hurt to have that. I'm not sure if this year is the year to take that on, but I
think we should definitely take a look at that. I -- I want to compliment you on optimizing
the service for Meridian. I really appreciate the work that you have done. The signage
is great. I -- I think especially just sort of fixing the routes and the frequency of the
routes has been fantastic and also thank you for providing the letter in advance of our
budgeting process. You probably heard that that is a point of frustration sometimes, but
thank you for doing that. I just wanted to -- the only piece I'm still not totally
understanding -- it could be a follow up, but I would like to get just a further breakdown
of the special assessment, the components of that as a follow-up to this meeting. I think
that would be extremely helpful and, then, you know, I wanted to say a one percent
increase is very much appreciated this year and I think that's very reasonable. So, it
seems like it's moving in the right direction. I definitely agree getting ridership up is
critical. You know, helping make sure that the service is successful. So, hopefully, we
will get there. Thanks for your work.
Clegg: And I will, in fact, follow up and get you more breakdown on that special
assessment.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: I think I have had my 10th or 11th VRT presentation that I have seen. By far
the best. I -- I have been known at times to be a little prickly from the dais. It's not my
intention, but it comes across that way and I recall years ago asking VRT to look at your
work from a local government perspective and we are seeing that today. I appreciate
that you are calling out ridership on routes. You are not resting on your laurels. Saying
we have way more to do. I commend you for saying this is our projection. This is what
we are shooting for. It makes it really easy for me to continue to be supportive. That
said, you inherited a real challenge with COVID and how that has impacted ridership
and I believe the changes you are making are to address that. I am really looking
forward to you being before us next year and saying this is what we projected, not only
did we meet it, we exceeded it or we got nearly here, but we overexceeded here and
those were kind of connected. One point. I appreciate you painting the picture for us
and letting us know. I'm really proud that we have brought public transit to Meridian, but
it -- as a budget -- you know this from your past experience -- it is a challenge for us to
look at it year over year and make sure that this is the right decision for us for the
taxpayers. I'm excited we have public transit. I'm also very critical of the system and I
want to make sure that it's meeting not just the riders, but the taxpayers as a whole. So,
I'm just forecasting that for you next year that if the -- there are a few more arrows
coming at you -- I don't want to do that. I hope that -- that you are able to say -- just
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 24 of 47
throw them right back at me, because you guys are kicking so much butt. That said I'm
going to ask you a question as a friend, but it's a question I get a lot.
Clegg: Sure.
Cavener: There is a perception amongst some in Meridian that the reason our VRT
buses are wrapped is because VRT doesn't want anybody to see that there is nobody
inside. Now, ridership isn't where we want it to be, but I -- I recall a time when we had a
route in Meridian that did sit empty for weeks at a time. We are not in that season
anymore. Talk a little bit more about what you are doing to attract what I kind of call
riders of choice, people that you -- you want people to choose to leave their car at home
or go to a park and ride and ride the bus. So, give us a little flavor of that.
Clegg: Thank you. Well, thank you for the kudos first of all and I appreciate the
questions as always. You know that. So, let me say one thing first and there -- there
always is this, you know, gosh, I see empty buses. What's wrong? And it's true. There
are some empty buses. There is also some buses who have a lot of people on them.
And so I -- those buses are usually on State Street or Vista or now Fairview. Hopefully
the 45 will begin to be one of those buses. What I often ask people when I hear that
question is do you live on a cul-de-sac? Anybody? Okay. And is your street empty 97
percent of the day?
Cavener: Ninety-nine percent of the day.
Clegg: Access services require lots of service in places where you don't get a lot of
riders that, then, connect to the services that do and so in some cases you will see
buses that don't have a lot of people on them, just like you see roads that don't have a
lot of cars on them in those places that are just providing access. On the other hand, on
those buses that should be providing a lot of rides, we ought to see a lot of riders and
what we are doing to attract that is is lots of things, but you mentioned some of them.
The -- the signs. I can't tell you how many people have said there is a bus route there?
I didn't know that. Now I do. How cool. So, making it obvious that there is actually a
bus route there. Giving them information. I used to -- my son lives right by the Fred
Meyer on Chinden and I would be there and I see somebody waiting at that bus stop,
knowing that the only bus that came there was peak hour and it was the middle of the
day. There was not going to be a bus and I would go talk to them and say do you know
there is no bus coming? Well, it says it's a bus stop. Now, everybody has that
information at the bus stop. Once they get there they can see that. We are doing an
inventory right now -- Kate is leading that -- of our bus stops and which ones have the
correct amenities, which ones don't. I'm happy to say that the first phase, which is the
biggest one hundred bus stops, are the ones that serve the most riders, that are very
high percent of those that have shelters, that have trash cans, that have bike racks, that
have all of the amenities we would like to see so it really attracts riders. The next phase
will be bus stops that aren't quite as highly used and we expect -- we will see that many
of those don't have those amenities and so previously VRT had a budget line item for
bus stop improvements and it was just the same amount of money every year and not
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 25 of 47
any real -- you know, just as things came up things would get done, which is not a bad
way to do it, but what we are going to look at is over a five year period what are the
improvements we know we need to make? How much would those cost? If we go after
a discretionary grant to pay for those, which I am confident we could get, how much
local match would we need to get all those done? I don't think it will be more than what
we were budgeting previously. I just think it will be a different way to do it and we will be
able to plan to get all of those amenities done that we identify in this next phase. We
know those amenities make a difference to riders. The other thing we are doing we are
putting art on bus shelters. You guys are getting one very soon. Two of them actually.
It's going to be very cool. I'm very excited about that. In addition, each of the shelters
now is going to have a route map. So, again, just information you use to go -- you didn't
know what routes were there. Now you see the whole system. If there is a shelter once
we get that completed and, then, finally, we have really leaned into using Main Street
Station and the Town Square Mall and hopefully ultimately the Happy Day transit center
more effectively by increasing the signage there, the wayfinding, letting people know
how to use the system. We have applied for a grant at Town Square Mall for bathrooms
and a break room for the drivers and on-route charging, some things like that. It won't
be overnight, but we know all of those things ultimately will lead to more riders, because
they are more -- more choice riders, because it's more attractive to ride. And, hopefully,
that answered your question.
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Whitlock.
Taylor: Mayor and Elaine, can you just give me a general sense of what the local match
is when you go after these federal or state dollars? Just a percentage on average.
Clegg: Sure. And it's good to see you, by the way, and congratulations. I haven't seen
you since -- since your appointment. So, great -- great to see you here. I know you will
do great as a -- in this phase of your public service. So, local match on capital projects
is 20/80. Unlike highways, which is seven and three-quarters and 92 and so buying
buses, buying, you know, shelters, doing the bus stop enhancements, those kinds of
things. Match on service is only 50/50 in the small urban area, which is Nampa-
Caldwell and is 50/50 only up to a certain percent of our federal funding in the larger
urban area, which is the Boise-Meridian area. So, overall in our budget we get close to
14 million a year from local cities and counties. We -- or 13 -- excuse me. We earned
over a million in fares last year. That's directly generated revenue. We expect to earn
almost a million in advertising this year. That goes to why do we have those wraps on
the buses. It's not to cover up whether there is riders or not, it's to earn money and we
are earning a lot of money on it and, then, we get -- for operations. All of that goes
toward operations. We get about 12 million a year in federal funding to match that. If
you are in Canyon county you would be paying a little bit less a percentage, because
the match there is -- is more generous. But overall we are -- we do about 45/55 -- 55
local, 45 federal on the operations. On the flip side on the capital it is an 80/20 and
often if we apply for discretionary grants we get actually a little bit better match rate. So,
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 26 of 47
on the raise grant that we have got in Ada county right now on State Street, it's a 15/85
match. Does that help?
Whitlock: Thank you.
Clegg: And overall that's about another ten million. So, total budget around 35 million.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, Elaine, I just would like to add my thanks. You and I have
had many conversations over the years on transportation and it's great to see you
leading the charge to really get the needle moving and make such progress and I look
forward to what is to come. I knew things were changing when I saw that one of my
son's 27, 28 year old friends was leaving his F-150 pickup at home and taking transit to
and from work. So, that's a hard age to impact, so thank you.
Clegg: Great story. Glad to hear it. Thank you.
Simison: Well -- well, to piggyback off that comment -- and I don't know if you have the
data or if you will have the data or not, but 45,000 rides on a route can be anything from
90 people commuting to and from work every day or it can be 45,000 unique rides.
Clegg: Yeah.
Simison: Do we have any idea how many -- how many different riders there are within
the system? Are we servicing a hundred people, 150 people? Five hundred people on
these routes? Do we have any way to track that yet or will we?
Clegg: We -- we can -- we can surmise it from the boardings and the lightings and the
location of that. We don't have it exactly. The way we do our passenger counts is an
automatic laser system, so we don't do face recognition. We can't say that's a unique
individual. I -- you know, it's a great question, Mayor, and I don't have an answer for
you. I can tell you on specific routes where we have looked at it what it is, but we --
that's an answer I will go ask Alyssa to start working on and see if we can get --
Simison: I think it would be important for us. You know, again, what's the cost per --
Clegg: Unique rider.
Simison: -- unique rider is a lot in the same way the conversation you just heard about
dog owners --
Clegg: Yeah.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 27 of 47
Simison: -- and the cost.
Clegg: I can tell you this much, we dug into it. City of Nampa had some very specific
questions and I don't have the presentation right before me, but my memory is there
were close to 5,000 unique riders over this -- all the services that we provided in the city
of Nampa.
Simison: Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate you being here.
Clegg: Thank you.
Simison: Great seeing you walking around downtown.
Clegg: I love walking -- this is a great downtown to walk around. I really love it. Thank
you.
18. Ada County Highway District Linder Road Concept Study, Pine to
Ustick
Simison: Thank you. Up next will be item -- Council, are you good to go? Do you want
me to take a break for any reason? All right. Then with that we will move on to Item 18,
which is the Ada County Highway District Linder Road concept study, Pine to Ustick.
We will welcome Brooke Green to the podium.
Green: Thank you, Mayor, Council. It's a privilege to be before you. For the record I'm
Brooke Green. I'm a planner there at Ada County Highway District. This is I think my
second time presenting this project to you. I'm here tonight to give you an overview of
our past public engagement opportunity that we conducted this past December. I'm
going to briefly go over the alternatives that we took out to the public as I see we have
got some new Council folks who were not here last time and, then, I'm going to talk
about the cost and the next steps. So, moving along, one of the things I do want to
highlight with this project is our engagement and it's one thing to note that the
engagement we took on this project is a little bit different than we have done in the past.
Recognizing Linder is very unique. It's got a lot of front-on housing and that was
important for us to be able to engage with those residents one on one and I will tell you
when we came into this engagement opportunity originally we wanted to start just with
general public outreach, but I will tell you I have done over 61 one-on-one meetings with
your residents here in your community. I have gotten to know them quite personally. I
have met their whole family. So, these one-on-one opportunities -- and we had some
really difficult discussions. Oftentimes -- I have met with each one of these residents at
least three times. At minimum maybe once or twice, depending on the respondents,
and this last time the real hard questions were asked more or less worst case scenario
what would happen, because when we do projects such as this, especially with Linder,
we are talking about 36 potential homes that ACHD may end up having to purchase
and so there is -- evening meetings are quite emotional. They are taxing. Believe me.
But one thing I can hope is that we are not going to have a lot of surprises based off of
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 28 of 47
what decision you pick, because we were upfront and we were honest and I call that
out, because what I'm going to go over today is the result of that public engagement that
took place this past December and it will tell you where the public is leaning on this
project. So, with that being said I want to go ahead and talk you through the project
itself. So, the project is no further north than Ustick Road, no further west than Pine
Avenue. I'm sorry. No further south than Pine Avenue. But some highlights, some
attractors along the corridor -- you have got Tully Park, which is a large attractor. You
have got Barbara Morgan Elementary School and you have Meridian High School and
all of those attractors were taken into account with these alternatives we put forward.
The path to adoption -- we have been at this for several years now. We started in
December 2022 with our first public outreach. That was just a survey. In January 2023
that's when we started doing our data collection and modeling. This is also when we
started to start doing our public engagement. We sent two letters to each property that
was going to be impacted along this corridor. So, if I thought that their houses were
potentially going to have some encroachment, I sent them a letter. If they didn't respond
to my first letter I sent them a second letter. So, we really did engage. As you continue
on we did our concept development. I have been before you before to introduce this
project. This past April I had this exact same presentation provided to our Ada County
Highway District Commission, as well as I had presented to the Meridian Transportation
Committee. So, that brings us to where we are at today, which is in June. It is the goal,
based off of what happens this evening and the next recommendation, that we take this
to adoption later this summer or early fall. So, quickly just go and recap what those
three alternatives were. What you are seeing before you was the three lane with a
shared use road. Note. The shared use road is only between the pinch point along the
corridor. That pinch point is at Sandalwood Drive and Chateau Drive. This was an
alternative we put forward to be able to minimize the property impacts. I'm going to
walk you through briefly each one of these. I don't want to spend too much time, but do
want to highlight some of -- some of the enhancements for those folks who are new to
the Council. So, starting off I'm going to bring your attention there to West Pine Avenue
and the main attractor there at the top of the slide, that's the Meridian High School. This
is the existing footprint. So, what you are seeing here is the four lanes. This is what
you see today outside of Meridian High School, but some enhancements that we do --
we did suggest and we are making along the corridor is you are going to see a lot of
pedestrian enhancements for good reason. You have got an elementary school, you
have got a park and you have got a high school and right now the pedestrian facilities,
based off of all the conversations I have had, aren't very comfortable. So, that first
enhancements, that modified pedestrian hybrid beacon to help facilitate kids who are
getting across the school there and at which point you are going to see the lane is going
to reduce back to its existing footprint, which is that two lanes through the rest of the
corridor. But to ensure access management -- control of access management we are
making some suggestions for landscape medians. This is in alignment with -- and in
partnership with the City of Meridian. Their tree landscape is what we are suggesting
continue along the corridor and I wanted to draw your attention to the first of several
homes that will be impacted. This circle here doesn't necessarily mean we are
purchasing those homes, but I want to highlight that those three homes -- or four
homes, because of the way we get close to their -- to their property, we made a
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 29 of 47
suggestion at that location, rather than continuing the multi-use pathway on that
segment, to actually cross people across the street if they want to continue on the multi-
use pathway and continue across Cherry Lane. Anything less than that, if we were to
do a multi-use pathway, we would be looking to purchase in this alternative. Continuing
along the corridor, this is where we are going to start getting to the pinch point and this
is going to see where you are going to see two of our suggested roundabouts. Chateau
Drive -- I'm sorry -- Linder between Chateau and Sandalwood are bookend by two
roundabouts and this is where you are going to start seeing some property impacts. It
was our hope with this three lanes with a shared use road that we were not going to
have property impacts. However, after our last conversation we did some analysis a
little bit more and that's when we started to realize that we are definitely going to have a
few property impacts, primarily because of those roundabouts. This is also where you
saw us try to get a little innovative in our approach to be able to preserve those homes.
This is where you are going to see the suggested shared use road. The shared use
road does provide access to those homes along that corridor through their own
designated space. To give you an idea of what that looks like, again, those are the
three homes that we are likely to have to purchase if this is the alternative that moves
forward and we have had that conversation with them that says, unfortunately, any
alternative and we are going to have to purchase your home and so that was a
conversation we just recently had. As difficult as that is they are -- they are not going to
see any surprises coming out of this. This is what that -- again that typical section looks
like. Something to note -- and based off of the comments that I actually received from
this committee and from Council Woman Strader was the concern about that mixed
space between pedestrians and vehicles on that shared use road. Something to note
about that shared use road, it really is to only provide for access for vehicles who are
trying to get to their homes. However, originally we were -- the goal was to be able to
create a space that's comfortable enough for everyone to mix in that space, because it's
so little utilization. We went back to the driving table and said can we squeeze in a
sidewalk in that location? And so you are seeing that suggestion here. It's the best we
can do just based off available space. Anything more than this and we would be -- we
would actually have to be purchasing homes and so moving along to the corridor, we
are going to get further closer to Tully Park to bring your attention to some other type of
pedestrian enhancements. Certainly they are getting to your Meridian parkway and this
is where we also start to see that mixed space with the open irrigation district --
Irrigation canal that's at that location. There is options we can do at that particular
location. This is one suggested option, which is to move that multi-use pathway behind
it, but still continuum on to Ustick and continued. Other options you are going to see
them in some of the other alternatives coming before you was to actually tile that. So,
again, moving on to concept number two. So, there were three concepts. This is the
second one. This is your standard five lanes. This is what you typically see right now
that is north of Ustick and this is what you see that is at Pine -- Linder and Pine. This is
also the largest footprint. So, should this one move forward it is going to be the largest
number of homes in which we have to purchase. So, again, I don't -- I don't want to
spend too much time walking through some of the amenities I highlighted, because the
amenities actually stay the same through all of these alternatives, with a few exceptions.
We are going to start with that exception right there. Because we are making a
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 30 of 47
suggestion of expanding the roadway itself and that multi-use pathway connectivity,
you are going to see the first series of homes that we are going to have to purchase. All
the yellow boxes represent a home we are going to have to purchase should this
alternative be the one that moves forward. At this location, rather than shifting
everybody across the street, we are keeping the multi-use pathway through the whole
corridor across Cherry Lane and hence we are purchasing some additional homes. In
addition to that, this is where we start to get back to that pinch point at Chateau and
Sandalwood. This is a standard five lane option. This does not have the roundabouts.
Now, the roundabouts in both of these alternatives can be shifted. So, if we want a
standard five lanes with a roundabout, it's certainly something we can consider. We
could keep it just with a shared use road, but just -- just to note. This is also where you
are going to see the largest number of property purchases that we are going to have to
do and I will tell you I have met -- I like to say with 65 percent of the property owners
along this corridor who are being impacted -- 65 is a pretty good number. I can't force
everybody to the table if they don't respond, but I will tell you we have engaged with
them and the -- it's mixed feelings. When we originally had the conversation the east
side was eager. It's the west side we were trying to preserve and I have since had that
difficult conversation. I will hold that discussion when we get to the next slide, because
that's something to note had to change. We made some changes. So, this is the pinch
point along the corridor. This is going to require us to purchase all of the homes which
you have highlighted there. There could potentially be some additional homes if a
roundabout option is considered. Again this is what that typical section looks like. The
footprint is approximately 89 feet, so it's fairly large. Continuing. Oops. It went too fast.
Continuing on to Tully Park, rather than the multi-use pathway being back behind the
canal at this point, because of the expansion of the road is so large, we are going to
have to look to covering up that canal and so the multi-use pathway being adjacent to
the road is a suggested option at this location. And, then, continuing along the five
lanes with the shared use road, this is -- the shared use road, again, just to note, only
between Sandalwood Drive and West Chateau Drive. That's the pinch point. This is
one of those options where we were trying to be a little innovative in our approach to be
able to preserve as many of the homes as we possibly could. Just to kind of give you
some general idea. Because we were purchasing all the homes on the east side it gave
us a little bit more space and so to that point we were able to provide adequate
sidewalks space, as well as -- as well as that shared use road. You have the landscape
buffers on both sides and the landscape median down the middle and, then, the travel
lanes. Because we are purchasing the homes on the east side, the multi-use pathway
is an appropriate facility at that location. So, just to walk you along. Again, the same
amenities still apply. We have the pedestrian hybrid beacon. This option, the shared
use road, the five lanes just continues what you have already in existence on Ustick.
Sorry. At Ustick as well as Pine. Continuing along the corridor, again, I'm just going to
highlight. Those yellow boxes represent a purchase. When we got to this pinch point
originally we came in hoping that we were going to be able to preserve all the homes on
the west side. However, once we did some additional layout and we were trying to
accommodate that multi-use pathway, it became evident that there were going to be a
few homes that we would actually have to purchase on the west side and so to give you
a general idea of what that looks like, I will bring this in a little bit closer, so you can get
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 31 of 47
a view. Those four homes closer to Sandalwood, those were -- originally we didn't think
we are going to have to purchase them. However, we are going to have to purchase
them and so it does reduce the number of homes in which we are able to preserve. We
have had some really difficult conversations with many of these property owners. If the
standard five lane option is the one that moves forward, there are many people who are
going to be impacted and so I will tell you that in those conversations a lot of people are
starting to understand the circumstances that are in front of them and I highlight that,
because I want to highlight what the public had to say and to bring you to that, again,
the multi-use pathway option here is behind the canal, as opposed to fronting there on
Linder, and, then, we bring you to the Engagement piece. So, when we took this out we
had more than 500 people respond, 2.8 thousand folks who visited the site to
understand a little bit more about the project, with over 448 folks who actually
participated in the survey. In addition to the 61 property owner meetings that we had.
Of those we asked them what do you think of these projects? What do you think of the
alternatives that were before you? And you are going to see that the three lane design
with the shared use road was the least liked amongst all of them. Certainly we
understand that with the growth that is taking place in Meridian it's clear that your
constituents want to see a five lane. Now, which five lane that is to question. So, we
went and we asked them of the standard five lanes, 60.5 either loved it or liked it. Just
of that and we just asked them what do you think of this? And, then, of the five lanes
designs with the shared use road 40 percent loved it or liked it. When we asked them
overall what is your preference, 45.6 percent of preference was concept two, which is
the standard five lanes. Concept number three, 28.3 percent, that's the one with the
shared use road. And, then, of course, the least liked amongst all of them, of course,
was the three lanes. I want to bring you into the next steps is the cost. So, we did a
cost comparison on each one of these projects and, obviously, the three lanes is going
to be the least cost and, then, you get into the five lanes and, then, you get in those five
lanes with the shared use road and you are going to see that number approaching
approximately 31 million dollars for the standard five lanes and, then, for the standard
five lanes with a shared use road approximately 30 -- 30 million dollars. We -- however,
what's not reflected in here and we are doing that analysis is relocation cost. Since we
have gone back and realized we are going to likely have to be purchasing more homes,
we are going to have to add about 223,000 dollars per home we purchase and that's
part of the relocation package, in addition to all the other compensation that comes with
it. I do want to take a moment to talk about what conversations did occur with the
property owners, so you have an understanding of what's been communicated. When
we communicated to all the property owners we talked about worst case scenario. If we
have to purchase your home this is what it would look like. We had a right-of-way agent
in on every single one of those calls and we talked about how this timeline would play
out and how it would impact their family. The compensation package -- and for your
understanding it's probably helpful -- the compensation package -- we look to their
appraisal or we look for the market, whichever one is higher, that is what we pay. In
addition to that, we look to the moving costs per room. So, they also get that additional
chunk. In addition to that, say for instance they did their -- refinance their two percent,
but, you know, it's raised to seven percent, we pay the difference of that for the duration
left of their loan. I bring that up because -- I bring that to your attention so you have an
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 32 of 47
understanding when those property owners or your constituents reach out to you, we
did walk them through what that looks like and, then, we walked them through about the
timeline, because every single one of these property owners is in a different timeline in
their life and so we talked about how long is this going to take. I will tell you three of the
ladies I spoke with with their families are in their 90s and certainly, you know, they would
like to stay there and so we took that into consideration we talked about how much
longer it's going to take before this project actually goes into construction. Others were
so eager, buy my house, I don't want to live on Linder, I can't back out. So, I just want
to put some -- a glimmer -- you know, some sort of -- tell you what that conversation
was. What we are having in those one-on-one meetings, because these are people's
homes, but I will tell you I don't think too many of them will be surprised with the
outcome of this decision or the decision of ACHD Commission is going to be and so I
hope that helps you in understanding what path to take. Lastly, just to kind of give you
an idea, somewhat -- we did take into account a lot of conversations through this
process with your team and with the representatives from the City of Meridian and some
of the concerns that were brought to our attention that we want to make sure that we
address in design is should we have to purchase all of these homes, what are we going
to do with that vacant space? It's important for your community that we take that into
account and so I commit to you that through the design phase of this project our staff
will work in concert with your staff to ensure that we address the access management
with the remnant parcels. We take into account any concerns regarding restrictions and
mitigate any issues with those parcels. It is your community. You certainly don't want to
look at dirt space along Linder and so we commit to you being able to work through that
process in the design phase. Other things that were brought to our attention that we
would like to do to enhance this is raised crossings at Sandalwood, consider that, and
review, if we could do that, at the roundabout should a roundabout -- the option move
forward, that we really lift those kids up into the view shed of those larger vehicles that
are traversing through our neighborhoods now and, lastly, to address some stormwater
facilities. But ACHD is committed to continuing to work with your staff through this
design phase to take into consideration a lot of those concerns about what happens if
we purchase that space, those parcels, and what's going to happen with that space
afterwards and, lastly, the next steps. So, this is where we are at. So, we have
presented to your transportation committee. We are here before you today. We are
asking that the City of Meridian and you consider what option you would like to move
forward or asking for a formal letter or formal response, so we can take that back to the
ACHD Commission and, again, we are looking and anticipating an adoption at the end
of the summer or early fall and that concludes my presentation and I will stand for any
questions.
Simison: Thank you, Brooke. Council, questions?
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 33 of 47
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, Brooke, thank you so much. That was a great presentation.
Excuse me. Is there any capacity difference? I know there would be for the three and
the five, but the five on the two different styles, because as we look for putting input into
what will be transportation 30, 40 years down the road, as you well know, capacity plays
a critical role.
Green: Mayor and Council Woman Little Roberts, the capacity stays the same. It is five
lanes. The changes of how fast it takes for you to get down the corridor that's going to
play a factor if we look to roundabouts as opposed to a signal and I certainly can bring
my person with HDR to talk kind of what we anticipate. It's going to be seconds if -- you
know, if a roundabout as opposed to an intersection, but the capacity will stay the same,
because it's five lanes.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Not to try to put you on the spot, Brooke, but just yesterday I was handed the
draft to the FY-25 to '31 regional TIP and in that it put a 5,772,000 dollar figure in for this
entire project. Like I said, the look on your face tells me that this was brand new
information for me. It was just handed yesterday from COMPASS. If you are not aware
of it I'm assuming, looking at this as we are talking about, that would be the initial
design, funding and starting with -- no? We have a -- we have a shake.
Green: All right.
Simison: From a friend.
Green: And she would be familiar with what was put in there.
Inselman: Yes.
Green: So, yes.
Inselman: Thank you. For the record, Kristy Inselman. I'm the planning supervisor at
ACHD. So, Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, so what was put in the TIP -- they can
only use the costs as what we had them, which was in the CIP. So, CIP was our 20
year horizon and that was anticipating a three lane roadway based on cost from like
2020. So, until an actual concept is adopted, then, we won't be able to update the cost
in the TIP until we have a formal path forward on what we are going to be doing. I hope
that makes sense. Mr. Mayor, follow up?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: It's best to look at that as kind of a placeholder until we decide which direction
we are taking. Thank you.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 34 of 47
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Brooke, thanks for the presentation. Quick question. When thinking about this
project and the Linder overpass, can you speak to how the overpass and riders -- or,
you know, the number of cars, how that was factored into some of the thinking here?
Just kind of -- if you can touch on that point I would appreciate that.
Green: Mayor and Councilman Taylor, I'm going to pull up Pearson to go ahead. He is
the one that conducted the modeling on the corridor itself. Certainly the overpass plays
a factor into this. I will let him speak any further details about what's on the horizon.
Whitney: For the record Pearson Whitney. HDR. Mayor Simison, Member Taylor. So,
we got the COMPASS long range model and we used that to analyze the traffic
associated with the proposed improvements and what we learned from that is that the
development of the overpass doesn't really affect the fact that the capacity on the
roadway will work in either a three or five lane configuration, because there are so many
other north-south routes and when you look at it from a larger origin and destination
perspective, either alternative will work and it won't really factor in substantially, because
there is other ways to get to the overpass.
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Whitlock.
Whitlock: Just on the -- the -- I think option three with the trees down the middle, who
maintains all of that and how does that work?
Green: Mayor and Councilman Whitlock -- and I'm glad I can say that. Congratulations.
This is an agreement we would have with the City of Meridian pertaining to the
maintenance of those facilities, similar to what we already have in place when we look
to do landscaping. It is in concert with the City of Meridian for the maintenance moving
forward.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Thanks for the thoroughness of the presentation to us and the efforts you
have made to our citizens. Your -- your point about our residents being in all different
places in their life, were there some emerging themes or reoccurring themes that came
from the public engagement that you tried to take into account? Are there -- were there
big themes? Is it start this two years from now? Start this now. I mean you -- you
touched on it. Certainly if I'm 90 I don't -- you are not -- I don't want you to take me out
of my home. If there is a new opportunity, right, I would hate to be one backing into
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 35 of 47
Linder. I don't wish that on anybody. But were there -- were there any themes or
reoccurring comments that you heard and is there a plan to take any of that feedback
into account with -- which -- whatever option you move forth with?
Green: Mayor and Councilman Cavener, yes, there were a lot of themes. I will tell you
initially -- certainly where you are in your life makes these decisions and this impact a
little -- little different.
Cavener: Yeah.
Green: For a lot of folks they were eager to -- once we got to the third meeting,
because I have met with them three times -- most of them three times. Once we got to
the third meeting I think they had a lot of time to digest what was coming. For those
who were older who would like to live out in their homes, I, too, would like to see them
live out in their homes. Those were some incredibly emotional meetings and when we
look to the costs associated with this project certainly that's going to be a factor played
into this. I'm only here to put the facts forward. As for planning and moving it forward,
look to our Commission for that direction. I can certainly look to the City of Meridian for
that direction, too. But the themes really determine where you are in your life and I will
tell you of the 60 -- so, 65 percent is approximately how many people I have met with,
there were three older women, all in their 90s. For them certainly I want to see them
live out the rest of their lives in their homes and would like to see that move forward. At
30 million dollars for a project I don't anticipate the dates we have listed in the integrated
five year work plan are going to -- to stay. So, play that into the decision. But my hope
is that they will be able to continue to stay in their homes and -- but I know that their
families were with them in these meetings. A lot of them were providing support. But
for everyone else -- some people would rather not. They would like to stay in their
homes until we actually have to purchase them. Some of them are please buy us out
early so I can move on with my life. You know, one -- one particular woman -- insurance
company wants her to change the roof of her house and she is like why go put in a 30
year roof when I'm going to have the house torn down? So, these -- that's decisions
people are having to weigh and, then, we show up at their doorstep and we have these
conversations. But because we did such a -- a phased approach in these conversations
I'm hoping that there aren't too many surprises. There will be one or two surprises, but
I'm hoping we eased this process a little bit more for them and we don't typically do this
in a concept, but I think it was important for this project.
Cavener: Thank you.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Just for some feedback, I'm still mulling it over, but it definitely doesn't seem
like three lanes is adequate, you know, to meet our needs and I agree with you that I
think what Meridian residents expect generally would be the five lane. So, it's really just
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 36 of 47
a question -- in my mind I have eliminated sort of option one and I think it's just the next
two concepts that sort of -- I guess are -- are there. So, we have -- the differences I
guess are the roundabout versus regular streetlights; right? Whether or not there is a
shared access road that I guess would preserve some homes along the corridor and,
then, the pathway location. Is there anything else noting -- worth noting?
Green: Mayor and Council Woman Strader, no, you have -- you have highlighted the
three changes -- or the three options of the two five lanes. You can do a roundabout in
either case. We just reflected on one. You can do the intersection in either case. And,
then, the multi-use pathway in concert in conversations with the irrigation district, that's
one that through design we can work through what the preferences are. Mind you when
we go through design we will have some additional public engagement that talk about
more nuanced pieces of this project. Right now it's a very high level just to figure out
what option. And to your point the citizens did weigh in. It looks to be one of the five
lane options is the preferred.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Just one quick question, Brooke. The shared lanes or the shared roads are
those one way? Really narrow? They are one way? So, kind of come in, come out,
just like to better understand what that looks like.
Green: Absolutely. Mayor and Councilman Taylor, yeah, you weren't here for the first
discussion and so I take some time really quick to kind of go over what that looks like. I
will reflect it there on the five lanes with the shared use road. You see the typical right
there. So, it is one way. And I don't know if you can see my cursor. Does my cursor
show up? Okay. It doesn't. So, I'm going to speak to it. So, if you lived on the west
side and you were getting to one of those homes that we were able to preserve with this
option and you wanted to go south, so you will actually come out of your driveway -- I'm
sorry. If you wanted to go north. You will come out of your driveway, it's one way south,
so you are going to continue along, you will come out -- you will go through the
roundabouts and you will flip around and, then, you can go up north and so that is -- the
shared use roads are one way for good reason. We don't have enough space to give it
to go two directions. With the roundabouts, however, we are able to facilitate that
movement. The shared use road could not be necessary -- it would be difficult with an
intersection, because we are not going to give -- you can still do it, but the roundabout is
what enables them to make the turns and get into their properties, because you are also
going to see -- we are making a suggestion for the landscape median down the middle
and that's for access control. We made that determination about the whole corridor to
minimize folks who are trying to make left-hand turn movements for the safety of the
public.
Simison: So, Brooke, a couple unfair questions and go from there. Only based on this
-- based on maybe some things I have heard. Do you think there is a willingness from
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 37 of 47
the ACHD Commission to do all three of these or is there one that you think is not really
an option from what you have heard or believe?
Green: Mayor and Council, so I can't speak on behalf of the ACHD Commission.
Certainly it's their prerogative to choose which one. They are very much looking to the
City of Meridian for your feedback and preference. I will tell you all three options are on
the table. I gave this exact same presentation to them as I'm giving to you this evening
and it will certainly be left up to them. I can't gauge and it's not my place to gauge
where they stand on this. I'm here to give the facts. But I will tell you they are certainly
eager to hear what you have to say.
Simison: Okay. Second and third questions -- you know, being Linder Road overpass
was like a Herculean effort at ten million from ACHD or 15 million -- at 30 million -- I
mean the questions you are asking about people's life decisions -- and I'm going to put
a few more words maybe in what I felt like what I have heard over the years is ACHD
has avoided making improvements on Locust Grove due to the amount of property
impacts and cost associated with. What is the likelihood that this is done in ten years
and, you know, all things considered -- financial with the rate we are -- you know, I
heard today the cost projections Eagle from Amity to Lake Hazel and, again, are -- are
these people going to be the ones that are going to actually going to be making the
decisions, because ACHD is going to go buy it now and maybe construct it in 15, 20
years? What -- what -- what would you expect from a time frame to the best of your
ability?
Green: Mayor and Council, very good question. Certainly the cost of doing business
has certainly gone up across the valley and not to mention the cost with many of these
projects we are seeing significant rises. For programming itself, you know, it is
programmed in the integrated five year work plan to move into design in 2028. The cost
does become a factor. The City of Meridian, city of Boise, all of our stakeholders, they
do provide their prioritization list and we take that into account when we are prioritizing
projects. This price tag is high, but I can't certainly determine what our Commission is
going to agree to in programming these projects, because it's ultimately up to them. But
we do have this in the integrated five year work plan as of today for the design work to
start in 2020 -- 2026 we will grant to -- you know 2024 now. Will that change? That
could shift. But this is a priority project which you guys have identified. We are out here
doing the concept for that good reason. The Linder overpass is a factor. But really the
programming and the prioritization will have to come from the City of Meridian in concert
with our ACHD Commission prioritizing this with the new -- with the cost. But all of our
projects are coming in with very high price tags and that's -- that's going to be a decision
our Commission is going to be left to decide which one moves forward. We -- I will tell
you the price tag is for the whole project in entirety. To your point about -- can we go
into design, can we start the right-of-way process, it is phased in over several years on
all of our projects. So, while we may not see construction right away, we can start the
other part -- other parts of this project to keep it moving forward and certainly in
alignment with your prioritization that you guys put forward.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 38 of 47
Simison: Thank you. Because just from a -- my two cents for -- I think a normalized --
and I say normalized meaning lights, not roundabouts on this corridor and, you know,
my -- my rationale is I -- I have got a roundabout near my house. I have always said
there is a time and place for roundabouts irregardless, but in this case that corridor, with
the schools that are on it and other things, I -- I just don't feel like roundabouts are great
for a lot of bus traffic that will -- that will drive through here, especially if you are only
going to have to -- on what is currently being built. I -- I -- I'm not getting the impression
that we are going to go back and redo the other intersections on Linder, but just to throw
in two roundabouts here in the middle when you remove the housing obstructions, you
know, there were -- the -- you want people driving slower if you had the -- the alley -- or
the people backing into the roadway, but when you remove that and you get to a more
standard road section, at least to me the regular lighted intersections would seem to
work better than putting in two random roundabouts along this -- what I think is going to
be -- no disrespect to the modeling -- I think this is going to be much heavier -- more
heavily used than the modeling predicts long term, because of all the community access
points that are along Linder that connect, you know, down from Eagle. You know, I'm
not going to say Swan Falls. I have only driven down there once. I'm -- I'm not going
that far. But, you know, the amount of people in -- and here in Kuna who are excited
about this -- I think the modeling is not going to be accurate long term for what this road
is going to be functioning as.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: I actually agree with most everything you said and talked about that
yesterday. I think that this is going to be a very heavily used road for the very fact that
it's going to be a north-south from the farthest edges of Kuna all the way into Eagle.
Already has a bridge crossing at the Boise River and I think it -- although we always try
to predict what the vehicle trips today are going to be on a roadway, sometimes we are
wildly off. When Locust Grove was just an overpass, vehicle trips doubled almost
instantly when that thing opened up. So, I don't -- I don't base what I think vehicle trips
are going to be based on it being just an overpass not a full on-ramps, off-ramps and I
think this Linder Road is going to get a lot of use and I will say right now I'm fully in favor
of the five lane concept that keeps it consistent through the whole area. I know it's a
huge impact, but I think it's the right thing to do.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Would you pull up the concept to graphic that's similar to this one?
Green: Mayor and Council Woman Strader, certainly.
Strader: Thanks.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 39 of 47
Green: Is this what you are looking for?
Strader: What I wanted to find was concept two. Yeah. Thank you. I think -- I think
there are some trade-offs just talking out loud; right? So, I -- I think the Mayor makes a
really good point about the pedestrian element with the schools and having, you know,
kind of standard intersections compared to a roundabout and I think to me like the
trade-offs there are -- it feels like the roundabout concept is pretty critical for the
success of the shared use road, because it's going to be really challenging for those
homeowners to sort of get in and out without a roundabout. I'm leaning a little bit toward
concept two, just because I feel like there is a level of predictability here. We are not,
then, kind of innovating this shared use road that we have never really tried before. I
have had some concerns, because it -- again, it -- because it's a one way I have had a
concern that people will see that as -- during traffic a way to zip through and kind of
avoid traffic, which I think is risky for the homes that would be along there. I just -- I feel
like concept two provides a level of predictability and sort of meets what I think most
people in Meridian consider like our standard and just what they would expect. So, I
mean I'm open minded and I'm -- I want to hear everybody's thoughts, but just -- it feels
like if we are not -- if we are not even considering roundabouts and that becomes our
consensus, then, I feel like we should move away from the shared use road, because
the roundabout feels really critical for that to be successful. I don't know. I'm just
sharing some thoughts. But that's my initial reaction.
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Whitlock.
Whitlock: Yes. Thinking back to the previous presentation -- I'm on that bus, too. I -- I
think from a safety standpoint and -- and I have -- there are some of those shared roads
-- and I don't -- I don't think they are attractive. I don't think they invite a good feeling in
your neighborhood. So, I -- I totally agree. I think it would become a thoroughfare for
people trying to get around traffic that will naturally build up there. So, I'm on that option
two bus.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: This may be a question for you and everyone else. Are we officially weighing in
tonight? Are we going to discuss this later and write a letter or is this our opportunity to
say what we think?
Simison: My understanding is ACHD would like a letter, but my desire is that this was
the decision point and we can put it into a letter from tonight's conversation anything
that needs to be pointed out specifically.
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 40 of 47
Taylor: Okay. Well, I'm -- I'm going to -- I'm supportive of the concept two as well. I --
actually do -- you made a good point. I -- I agree with that. I think once the Linder
overpass is done I think this will be a pretty significant roadway. I think it will be a lot of
-- a lot of traffic, especially as the community grows, really only having a few points
where we can go north-south in Meridian across the freeway. So, I -- yeah, I think
concept two works and I agree with Council Woman Strader's comments, I think this is
just what the people expect and what we like and I think familiarity is -- is good.
Sometimes we introduce new concepts here and there and I think they -- sometimes
they confuse, if anything. So, I -- I -- I am in support of concept two. I think that's the
right approach.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: I'm in agreement as well. I think there could be a case made if there was
such a -- make a significant shift in cost, but they are, you know, similar I guess
playbook, so I'm -- I'm supportive of concept two. I think it's the right thing to do.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor and Brooke, I will concur with that. I think looking through
everything -- everything has got its pluses and minuses, but I think we can only consider
the larger roadways and with that I would concur that concept two would be our best
route to go.
Simison: Okay. Well, with that you have heard the feedback. We will have a letter
transmitted to you no later than -- you know, if -- we will talk and see if we are going to
bring something back. It's going to be a pretty simple letter. I'm not going to just --
mean we are not going to go into a lot of deviation, other than saying concept two. But
we will get something to you hopefully by early next week.
Green: Okay. Thank you, Mayor, Council. It's a privilege to be before you. Appreciate
this opportunity to bring this project and to work with your constituents. It has been a
fun project, because it's different, and I want to thank you for taking your time tonight to
-- to consider it and I will take that back to our Commission and we shall hear this
hopefully at the end of the summer, early fall.
Simison: And thank you, Brooke. And just -- I know it's a tough job, so thank you for
your -- your disposition in dealing with the residents and having those very tough heart
wrenching conversations and, you know, at least on a personal level, you know, great,
but I think if you can -- from my perspective I think that the homes that need to be
purchased sooner should be purchased sooner to help alleviate things that people are
either going to try to do or stages of life, you know. So, even if it's phased, even if this is
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 41 of 47
not going to be built for -- constructed for 15 years, the more we can advance that the
sooner the better I think for all of us, especially for the residents impacted that want to
leave.
Green: Yeah. That's what I heard from the residents. So, I will tell you, just to
understand the decision tonight, these residents know this is coming and so while they
were tough decisions, I hope that helps you in your decision making process, too, to
know that we have been communicating to them and have been transparent this whole
time.
19. Ada County Highway District Master Street Map Changes — Arterial
Corridor Preservation
Simison: Thank you, Brooke. Mr. Hood, are we quick? Unless someone needs a
break. I think this will be fairly quick, this next item?
Hood: Mr. Mayor, I -- I hope to be pretty brief. It's a pretty detailed topic, but I will go as
quickly as -- as possible.
Simison: I just want to make sure everyone's good and we don't need to take a break
or if you planned on being long. So, with that --
Cavener: Agree to the rush. Sorry, Mr. Mayor.
Simison: Yeah. Exactly.
Cavener: If this was going to be an hour, then, maybe to take a five minute break, but if
we are going to be --
Hood: Certainly not an hour from my perspective.
Simison: Okay.
Hood: Ten, 15 minutes maybe.
Simison: All right. Then with that we will move on to Item No. 19, Ada County Highway
District master street map changes, arterial corridor preservation. Mr. Hood.
Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Kind of building -- I was trying to
figure out a way to work riding a bus into this presentation, but standards came up just a
couple of times in that last presentation, so, really, this is about standards. This is a
follow up to the conversation we had with ACHD -- you had with ACHD in January at the
joint meeting talking about McMillan primarily, but other arterial roadway section line
arterial roadways in Meridian and standardizing that and saying, hey, at least plan for
five lanes on all section land arterials. I am asking this evening that -- that we send a
letter to ACHD formalizing kind of that informal conversation that we had. They did kind
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 42 of 47
of a back-of-the-napkin estimate of what that, you know, financial impact is, because
there are some three lane roadways, as we just pointed out with this segment of Linder
previously or even currently they are still planning on that being three lanes, but five
lanes is an option. There is a financial impact. But we want ACHD to consider that in
their planning moving forward. So, that first document that -- that considers that as the
master street map or the Master street plan. So, again, what I'm proposing to you
through the Transportation Commission that's talked about this over the last three
meetings that they had, was to request ACHD change several segments. So, I'm just
going to run through four -- four maps real quick. McMillan corridor, this one's pretty
easy. It's the one, two, three, four, five miles of McMillan on the western part of the city
and our area of impact. Going to slide two. So, match line basically here. There is
seven miles of McMillan that would change. They are only currently planned to be
three. Two miles of Meridian Road north of Ustick and two more miles of Locust Grove
north of Ustick that, again, are only currently planned for three lanes. We would ask
them to make those -- preserve the right of way for up to five lanes in the future. Cherry
-- actually there is a -- there is a change. This is the biggest conversation with the
Transportation Commission. One of the things that staff asked the Commission to
consider and -- and Council -- although I will stand down -- is the viability of Cherry Lane
west of Meridian Road being a seven lane roadway in the future. There is some pretty
significant impacts and the Transportation Commission wasn't comfortable making that
request to go down to five. So, right now ACHD is actually planning for that to be seven
and staff said, hey, we would like, again, that standard. Maybe five makes more sense.
We are going to do some more evaluation over the coming year with the Transportation
Commission, so we can put a pin in that. If you want to comment on it that's fine, but
the Transportation Commission said, hey, we are not quite comfortable going there yet.
So, the yellow segment, including the -- the piece that's purple, no change to that to
what ACHD is planning and that's seven lanes. So, aside from Cherry-Fairview and
these few miles that go into Boise is seven lanes -- I'm going to jump real quick to this
one. Overland. There is two miles of Overland that are also planned for seven lanes in
the future. Everything else is either three or five and with this change, again, back to
standards, everything would be five lanes or a hundred feet of right of way, except for
those couple of miles -- jump back real quick. Also impacted is Overland west of ten
Mile. Two miles. All of the Victory corridor into Boise and one mile of Amity that ties in
there in Boise and, then, South Eagle Road. And Columbia I guess. I didn't -- forget
that. So, again, in the interest of time -- I can jump into that more. I can explain more
about how the -- the master street map functions, works, how it works with our
Comprehensive Plan, generally how ACHD uses it, although we have Kristy here, so
she could give you more details. But, again, that is the request. I have drafted a letter.
I actually shared it with Dave -- Mr. Miles this afternoon. Fairly straightforward. Just
lists these and says, hey, we would like ACHD to consider changing the master street
map per these four attachments. And, again, with that, Mr. Mayor, I would stand for any
questions you or the Council have.
Simison: Thank you, Mr. Hood. Council, any questions?
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 43 of 47
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Maybe I'm being dense, but just to make sure I understand, so the plan is to
ask for the preservation of up to five lanes in these areas, except for where more lanes
are planned.
Hood: Seven. Uh-huh.
Strader: Right. So, we are just sort of carving out -- if you have already planned more
lanes we are not planning to shrink them, obviously. Yeah. Okay. I think -- I think it
makes great sense personally. Thank you.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Yeah. But I just want to make sure that I -- I heard you right that when you
said staff wanted to take a look at the seven lanes, is that City of Meridian staff, highway
district staff? Both? Help fill me in.
Hood: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I appreciate the question. A little bit --
so, mostly city staff, although at the Transportation Commission we did have a
representative from the West Ada School District who was also supportive of
considering -- I don't want to over speak or -- but with the middle school being there,
high school not too far away, seven lanes, obviously, is harder to cross for a middle
schooler that's maybe trying to go to our library or get home on the north side of -- of
Cherry Lane. So, a lot to consider there. You want to move traffic; right? There is
projections with motorists, but you also have a livability factor, so -- but, again, back to
your original question, mainly city staff that said, you know what, let's -- let's maybe
think about this Meridian Road with the interchange, maybe that's where we transition is
our downtown from seven and keep five lanes all the way to the west. I don't have a
true pros and cons list developed, but it was something that we at least asked to think
through a little bit more is a seven lane facility right through the middle of our community
makes the most sense. However you define that.
Simison: And maybe, Caleb, at least in this case -- I mean you are talking about
redevelopment before you would ever go do right of way, otherwise, there is a
purchase. So, it's not as if though we are -- it is a little bit of different conversation and
develop over time.
Hood: And -- and, Mr. Mayor, if I may just to follow up on that a little bit, the master
street map mainly is about preservation and there is not a whole lot to preserve there,
because there is not a whole lot of development from greenfield development. You will
see redevelopment over time, but, again, those impacts are pretty large on the existing
properties that are there when you have to buy the additional right of way for ultimately
seven lanes. So, there is still community impacts. Yes. Good point, Mayor. That
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 44 of 47
redevelop -- there is preservation. This is a lot about preserving for the future whatever
that may hold.
Simison: Council, any -- we could -- if so -- I know I got a letter forwarded to me, but
haven't looked at it. But I -- again, I assume it will be a pretty simple straightforward
letter on this one as well. All right. Thank you very much.
Hood: Thank you.
ORDINANCES [Action Item]
20. Ordinance No. 24-2054: An ordinance (Reveille Ridge Subdivision —
H-2023-0050) annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of
the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of
Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning
59.97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition)
to R-8 (34.69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28
acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing
city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the
official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries
and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with
this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed
with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada
County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required
by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective
date.
Simison: With that Item 20 is our -- is Ordinance No. 24-2054. Ask the Clerk to read
this Ordinance by title.
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 24-2054, an ordinance Reveille Ridge
Subdivision, H-2023-0050, annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the
northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 2
North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A", rezoning 59.97 acres of such real property from the RUT to the R-8, 34.69
acres, Medium-Density Residential, and R-15, 25.28 acres, Medium-High Density
Residential zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps,
as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the
zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that
copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County
Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required
by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date.
Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there
anybody who would like it read in its entirety? If not do I have a motion?
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 45 of 47
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Move that we approve Ordinance No. 24-2054.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 24-2054. Is there any
discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea;
Whitlock, yea.
Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to.
MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES.
Simison: Council, we have reached the end of our meeting agenda, but we have also
reached the last meeting for Deputy Chief Joe Bongiorno prior to his retirement from the
city. Joe, it's been a pleasure having you join me up here for the full five years. I know
it goes well beyond that in that context. We have had a lot of good conversations and
feedback from you for what you have done just here, but we really appreciate and value
everything you have done for your career to the residents of Meridian. So, you got a
mic in front of you. If you have any final parting words of wisdom that will be on the
record I'm sure we would be happy to take them.
Bongiorno: No. Mr. Mayor and Council, thank you so much. It's been a wild ride for
sure. My 24 years with the City of Meridian, 21 years full time, three years as a
volunteer has been awesome. I'm happy I made it to the end of my career and it's been
a blast sitting here with you guys. Thank you so much.
Simison: Council, anyone else?
Cavener: Yeah. Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Take a mic away for me tonight when it comes to this one. Chief, you have
taught me a lot and how I look at a land use application today is much different than
how I looked at it ten years ago and it's thanks to you. You really bring a public safety
approach to all of our work and you have made us as a city better, us as a Council, me
as a Council Member better. I will forever use the term speed pillows as long as I exist,
but there is something bigger than that and you are just an incredible man and a father
and a husband and a leader and on the few occasions we have been able to eat
together and connect -- not as a deputy chief and a Council Member, just as two guys
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 46 of 47
who care about this Meridian -- this community of ours, I have just -- I have learned a lot
about you and I just continue to admire you both personally and professionally. Know
that will continue long after Friday and really want to just wish you well in a new chapter.
We appreciate it.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: I will try to do this without crying. I already got to hug him outside. I first
encountered chief at the Chamber. He came to do an inspection and learned a lot that
day about -- and have been learning ever since. It's been a pleasure to get to work with
you the first time and, again, the second time and so you will definitely be missed. Just
wish you the very best. I know there is a second chapter and just real excited to hear
about what that is, so --
Bongiorno: You are going to have to teach me how to golf.
Little Roberts: Deal.
Strader: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Strader.
Strader: Yeah. No. I just want to share everyone else's comments and thank you so
much, you know, for spending your most precious resource your time with us for so long
and building a career here and you have, obviously, made a huge impact on everybody
and I wish you well in the next chapter.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: I was going to try to take -- go to adjournment, so I don't want you to have to
say anything nice about someone from the fire department, but Councilman Overton.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, I'm struggling here, but I'm going to get through it. I have spent a
career not having to say too many nice things about firemen, but in all jest. You have
been a supremely dedicated member of the department and I'm proud to call you chief
for all of your years of service to this community. Every night you are here we can tell
that you are only interest and your main interest is for the citizens of Meridian, not for
yourself, and that's what's most important that you carry with you and be proud of.
Appreciate it.
Simison: With that anyone want to end the meeting?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council Work Session
June 18,2024
Page 47 of 47
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: So much fun, but I move we adjourn the meeting.
Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The
ayes have it. We are adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:57 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 7-9-2024
ATTEST:
CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7-9-2024