Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-06-18 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 18, 2024 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (Item 15 Continued) CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved as Noted Motion made to approve except item 15 by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Approve Minutes of the June 11, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting 4. Foxcroft Water Easement Full Release (ESMT-2024-0076) 5. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Emergency Access Easement Number 1 (ESMT-2024- 0079) 6. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024-0082) 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Pebblebrook Subdivision (H-2024-0005) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 5725 N. Meridian Rd. 8. Final Plat for Horse Meadows Subdivision (FP-2024-0006) by KB Homes, located at 710 B. Black Cat Rd. 9. Development Agreement (Reveille Ridge Subdivision H-2023-0050) Between City of Meridian, Endurance Holdings LLC (Owner), and Challenger Development (Developer) for Property Located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. 10. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 11. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian Library District Foundation, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 12. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian Senior Center for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 13. Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Special Event – Meridian Fine Arts Festival 14. Resolution No. 24-2459: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, Setting Forth Certain Findings and Purposes to Declare Surplus Property and Authorizing the Donation of Certain Computer and Equipment to Computers for Kids 15. Item Continued to June 25, 2024 Resolution No. 24-2460: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 9.8, Regarding Grant Management; and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 16. Idaho Humane Society Fiscal Year 2025 Budget/Contract Presentation 17. Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Update and Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request 18. Ada County Highway District Linder Road Concept Study, Pine to Ustick 19. Ada County Highway District Master Street Map Changes – Arterial Corridor Preservation ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 20. Ordinance No. 24-2054: An ordinance (Reveille Ridge Subdivision – H-2023-0050) annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit “A”; rezoning 59.97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (34.69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28 acres) (Medium- High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener ADJOURNMENT 6:57 PM Meridian City Council Work Session June 18, 2024. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, June 18, 2024, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is June 18th, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Quick apologies. We are going to make a slight modification to the Consent Agenda. We are going to take Item 15 and continue it to next week, but with that just forecasted change, I move that we adopt the agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Approve Minutes of the June 11, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 2 of 47 4. Foxcroft Water Easement Full Release (ESMT-2024-0076) 5. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Emergency Access Easement Number 1 (ESMT-2024-0079) 6. Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024- 0082) 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Pebblebrook Subdivision (H-2024-0005) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 5725 N. Meridian Rd. 8. Final Plat for Horse Meadows Subdivision (FP-2024-0006) by KB Homes, located at 710 B. Black Cat Rd. 9. Development Agreement (Reveille Ridge Subdivision H-2023-0050) Between City of Meridian, Endurance Holdings LLC (Owner), and Challenger Development (Developer) for Property Located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. 10. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 11. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian Library District Foundation, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 12. Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridian and the Meridian Senior Center for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds 13. Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Special Event — Meridian Fine Arts Festival 14. Resolution No. 24-2459: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, Setting Forth Certain Findings and Purposes to Declare Surplus Property and Authorizing the Donation of Certain Computer and Equipment to Computers for Kids 15. Item Continued to June 25, 2024 Resolution No. 24-2460: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 9.8, Regarding Grant Management; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: First up is the Consent Agenda. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 3 of 47 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we approve Items 1 through 14 on the Consent Agenda and continue Item 15 to next week. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 15 moved to next week. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 16. Idaho Humane Society Fiscal Year 2025 Budget/Contract Presentation Simison: So, we will move on to Item 16, which is Department/Commission Reports. First up is the Idaho Humane Society of Fiscal Year 2025 budget contract presentation. Chief, do you want to introduce this at all before we get going? Okay. All right. Then I will welcome up the Idaho Humane Society. Gilberg: Good afternoon, Mayor and Members of the City Council. My name is Leann Gilberg. I am the Chief Financial Officer at the Idaho Humane Society. Also here today is Dr. Jeff Rosenthal, our CEO. Craig Nixon, who is the director of our Animal Care and Control Services and Kris Shaffer, who is our chief operating officer. He oversees the animal care portion of our operations in the shelter. We thank you for having us here this afternoon. We are proud to serve the citizens of Meridian and we value our relationship with your city. We also value the positive working relationship that our officers have with your police officers. So, thank you to the officers for working with us. Just want to give you a little bit of an idea of what we have been up to at the Idaho Humane Society in the past year. This is outside of kind of the scope of animal control, but to give you an idea of who we are and what we are doing, we saved 9,636 pets last year. Our save rate for dogs is 94 percent. Our save rate for cats was 95 percent and those numbers allow us to be considered a no kill shelter, which is a great accomplishment for us. We have been that way for several years and if you have been around the valley for a long time you will know that that wasn't the case 20 or 30 years ago. So, we are very proud of that designation. We also reunited 1 ,464 lost pets with their owners and spayed or neutered 9,833 pets, preventing unwanted litters. We Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 4 of 47 provided veterinary care to 10,418 privately owned pets from predominantly low income households and that was in our public veterinary hospital and we supplied over 68,000 pounds of food to members of the pet food pantry and Meals on Wheels for Pets program. So, we do a lot of helping in our community and the majority of these efforts were funded by charity and our own internal efforts. They were not funded by animal control activities. We account for those separately. But, again, just thought you would like to see some of the good things that we are doing. Specifically related to Meridian, we responded to 1 ,321 calls or incidents last year. We issued 18 citations for animal code violations, 178 barking dog letters and warnings, 53 issues -- notices for dogs at large, 95 warnings for other animal code violations. We like to -- I guess what you would call do community policing. So, we educate when we can, rather than cite. Our first -- the first thing that we would like to do is try to educate people, so our officers educated 326 times, rather than citing people in the community. We handled 1 ,691 animals from Meridian. We impounded 1,203 animals and we returned 278 animals to their owners. We have animals that come to us from Meridian from many different intake channels. So, I thought I would just give you a preview of a couple -- a few of those that came in. This is Hurley. He is a ten year old that was brought in by animal control. He stayed with us for four days and, then, was responded -- or returned to his owner. These two little guys were brought in for protective custody by animal control after their owner passed away. They stayed with us for five days and, then, they were reunited with a family member who took them home. This is Brody. This was a sad case. This -- these people had to surrender their puppy because he was very ill and they couldn't afford the care. So, we kept him for eight days. We used grant money to provide a life-saving surgery for him to remove a foreign object that was lodged in his intestines and, then, we returned him to his family at no cost to them. And this is Tuna. She's still with us. She was 22 years -- 22 days old last week. She is going to be with us for about six weeks. She came in with a broken leg. Animal control brought her in and she will stay with us until she grows a little bit, gets old enough to be spayed and get her vaccinations and her microchips and, then, she will be adopted. You can see that these all came as a result of our relationship with you as -- through our animal control contract services and as you probably know we provide services for all of Ada county pretty much, with the exception of Garden City. We only have a sheltering agreement with them. We don't do any enforcement basically. In relation to the big picture, to give you an idea of where Meridian falls in that bigger picture, Meridian made up approximately 27 percent of the population that we serviced last year and counted for about 22 percent of the calls and your contract fees accounted for just over 22 percent of what we charged for the animal control contracts. For fiscal year '25, as you can probably see on there, our ask from Meridian is 717,251 dollars. That is an increase of 7.25 percent, but that is slightly less than the total increase in our cost, which we are projecting to be about nine percent. We once again allocated the total cost to the various agencies that we contract with using a consistent methodology that combines prior years population served and calls that come in from the different jurisdictions. The ratios remain pretty -- remain pretty consistent over the past few years. Your portion went down just a tidbit, because we did add Star to the pool. It's a small addition, but it did drop other organizations' percentage just a tidbit and as I'm sure you can all relate to, our costs have continued to rise at significant rates over the Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 5 of 47 past few years. Our increases are primarily due to continued pressure on payroll and the cost associated with the staffing to provide the animal control services. Since the time -- just to give you an idea -- that the fiscal year '23 budget was presented salaries for veterinarians have increased over 20 percent. There is a national veterinarian shortage and trying to get veterinarians anywhere in the valley is a challenge. Rates for technicians have increased over 15 percent. Animal control officers have increased over 13 percent. Shelter staff over 12 percent. And the majority of these positions pay under 20 dollars an hour. So, it's not like we are making people rich working at the Idaho Humane Society. What this graph shows you is in the past five years the wage inflation has been significant and that is why you have continued to see your fees go up. A new animal control officer started at 13 dollars an hour back in fiscal year '20 and they are up to 20 dollars an hour in the fiscal year '25 budget. And, again, nobody's getting rich on 20 dollars an hour. Fifty-four percent in five years, 64 percent for a mid level officer, 65 percent for a supervisor, 38 percent for a dispatcher. Front desk staff from 10.45 to 16.70 five years later. Sixty percent increase. So, as you can see these -- these pay increases have continued to push us to have to increase the fees that we are charging and in order to be competitive, to be able to hire and retain staff, it's just necessary for us to do this. The animal control program funds about 41 FTEs. So, 41 full-time employees to service over 500,000 people in the valley and those 41 employees make up about a third of our workforce at IHS. That covers enforcement, animal care, including veterinary care, customer service representatives. They deal with people who bring in dogs or come in to redeem their dog. Get them out of jail. Dispatch. And, then, of course, there is an admin and HR component of that, because, you know, there is payroll and different things that have to be handled as well. You can see that the total cost for our services, based on our expenses, because we do a zero budget, it's just over 3.3 million dollars for fiscal year '25. That's a 9.23 percent increase from fiscal year '24. And, again, if you go to the next slide, the -- the big dollars are really in the payroll bucket of that. It's a 7.7 percent increase in payroll. But it's 13 percent for animal control personnel, almost seven percent for shelter personnel. You see a decrease in the admin side, because we have decreased the top overhead. Dr. Rosenthal and myself, we have decreased our percentage that is allocated to the contracts, just because we feel like we have hired a higher level director in the program now and the operating expenses are up 14 percent, but that's really only about 100,000 dollars over the -- over -- split over, you know, six organizations. So, we really try to keep our operating expenses, which is your utilities, your insurance, your dog food and that kind of stuff -- the increases are minimal. Focus our increases on the payroll to continue to ramp up our staffing. And, then, just one other thing I wanted to touch on is what we are doing with our officers. Since Director Nixon has come on we have really ramped up or continued to ramp up -- this is something we have been working on for a couple years -- our training program for our officers. They go through eight to ten weeks of field training with an experienced officer. They get certified through NACA, which is the National Animal Control Association. They do level one and two certifications. They do continuous online classes, in-service training with the Ada County Prosecutor. Craig's been having them come in monthly and do training with the officers and we also do -- they do biweekly team meetings on like -- and training on like report writing and policies and procedures and so we feel like we are doing our best to provide a quality Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 6 of 47 service for you guys for your community and we do value our relationship and we hope that you see the value that we bring to your community, because we do. I really enjoy working with Meridian. So, that is pretty much in a nutshell what I have. If anybody has any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Maybe I can kick a couple things off. Would you mind going back to the slide on the details for the budget increases. Yeah. If you could just go back a little more. I think it was -- keep -- keep going. I think a couple more. Yeah. Gilberg: This? Strader: I think so. Mr. Mayor. So, help me understand how you -- just for context. mean this -- I think in my opinion seemed to be a really tough budget year for the City of Meridian. So, we have increasing costs across the board. We have 18 firefighters that we need to take on their wages and benefits in a couple fiscal years. We are just really stretched thin. So, help me understand, you know, how -- how we can get this percentage increase down. What options are available, if any? Is there a way to recoup, you know, additional fees from pet owners? Is -- what are you doing to kind of control your personnel costs? I kind of want to get into some of the meat of that. And just one comment. I think in the future if you could provide these presentations in advance of the meeting that would be extremely helpful to us, because we are in the middle of our budgeting process and we haven't had -- Gilberg: I kind of forgot about it and the request didn't come through and so today I was like, oh, I probably should have sent this to them. So, yeah, I apologize for that. To answer your question -- I mean in the big picture of things you guys are actually getting a pretty good deal. If you look at your percentage of population that we are serving, which is, you know, almost 27 percent and 22 percent of calls and if you average those out you are probably actually looking at more like a 24 percent of the total cost base and you guys are paying 22 -- well, 21.8 percent next year. So, in reality I think that we are doing -- you guys are getting a pretty fair allocation. Some of the things that we, you know, could look at -- because from -- as far as the staffing perspective, we are bare bones staffed. I mean we are trying to get three to four officers on the streets every day. We have one dispatcher every day. We have got three people working the front desk, but the number of animals we have coming in and the number of calls that we are getting -- we can't cut our staffing anymore. You know, if your police wanted to take on more -- like maybe bringing animals to us or something, we could potentially look at something like that where we took some of the enforcement off of our plate, but, you know, when I'm paying officers 18, 19, 20, 21 dollars an hour -- we are having a really hard time hiring people and keeping them as it is. I just don't -- I have got so much Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 7 of 47 pressure on payroll costs that I'm -- I'm pushing constantly to reduce our like benefit costs and trying to keep those costs down. There is just not a lot of wiggle room in the personnel budget and personnel is 75 percent of the animal control budget, 75 percent of the cost of animal control services is personnel and pay related. We can -- you know, we can look at it, but I just don't -- I -- off the top of my head I can't think of anything that's going to reduce that significantly. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. And I think -- again I think that speaks to the importance of providing the details around your operating budget. You know, you are -- we are outsourcing basically a city service to you. The City of Meridian has a very conservative financial philosophy and I think some of the things -- like new vehicles, things like that, we need to dig into some of those details. Gilberg: To give you a feel for new vehicles, we -- they cost about a hundred thousand dollars each. We -- city of Boise bought two vehicles and basically provided them to us two years ago'ish. We bought one. We, then, bought another one and we got another one on order, because the ones that we have literally have over 300,000 miles on them. Two of them that we have on the road still are ones that we got from your animal control when we took it over. We bought two of your guys' vehicles and we are still running them. So, they are kind of like -- can we, please, get something that's more reliable. So, after this round that I just ordered this last one, I think we are probably done purchasing vehicles for a while, but I don't even bill those out in the contracts every year. I split it over three years. So, the portion of those costs that you are paying -- you are paying 20 percent of a hundred thousand dollar vehicle over three years. So, it's pretty small dollars. Strader: Mr. -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I -- you know, so I -- I don't know. I just want to go through and understand the history, but I think, you know, we had a 4.52 percent increase year over year of the previous year, then, it was a 7.18 percent increase year over year. This is close to a seven percent increase. Yeah. I saw it -- some of the -- in some e-mail history I quickly glanced at it -- it did say something like the goal is to like pay employees a livable wage. I want to make sure we are paying employees a market wage. I think that that's an important piece of understanding. Gilberg: I completely agree with you and if we go to that next slide and just look at it, I'm not sure that any of those wages are what I would consider out of market. I mean McDonald's is hiring for 15 dollars an hour and our front desk staff on average are making 14.89, 15.64 right now. We are bumping it to 16.70 and that's average. That's Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 8 of 47 the brand new person who just started and the supervisor who has been there for two years. So, out of, you know, the -- of the four or five people that are -- work in that department that's -- that is an average. So, I mean they are starting at 14 dollars an hour. Strader: Okay. So, it sounds like from your perspective the -- really the only option available is if our police department takes on kind of an increased burden that -- that doesn't sound like us. Gilberg: Because I can't think of -- I mean, Craig, any suggestions? Nixon: So -- so, this is a consolidated contract, even though it doesn't come in as a consolidated contract among all the different municipalities in Ada county. So, everyone's sort of buying into the same system, the same service levels and they are all paying a proportional share. So, that benefits you tremendously. The -- the -- the -- the -- Leann mentioned bringing on Star. So, that -- that proves the power of not duplicating services and rather spreading the cost out among all the different communities. One of the issues that occurs, however, when we get into individual negotiations is that because it is a combined contract we have a lot less room to change things, because everybody else is also budgeting in under that service contract. So, a number of years ago before we moved to a two facility model, we met with all of the municipalities for a year before making some major changes to the animal control contract. One of the things that was discussed at that time was actually a suggestion of ours is to form a -- kind of a joint powers agreement among the different municipalities, so that these sort of details could be worked out earlier in the year amongst the entire group, because what happens in Meridian actually impacts Boise and impacts Kuna and vice-versa, so it's very hard for us to sort of individualize -- craft a -- kind of a -- kind of a -- an a la carte contract with one community, Garden City, being really the only one right now that -- that has that, but they are doing all the enforcement. So, that's something to consider and that -- this is one of those services that doesn't make sense for a community to do on their own, because the cost, then, just completely skyrockets. It's -- it's something that works because all the communities are buying in and they are only buying a portion of each employee versus having to employ a -- you know, buy -- buy the entire employee. So, I think one of the things that could be explored in future years would be greater coordination among all the different communities, rather than us individually going out and, you know, pitching these -- these contracts individually. We had a consolidated contract for a couple years actually where everybody signed on. That's gone by the wayside. Strader: Thanks. That's -- that's it for now. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 9 of 47 Cavener: Mr. Rosenthal, I may have another quick question that you may be really well equipped to answer for me. If we could jump back one more slide. It -- it's what kind of piqued my interest, which was -- yeah. I think calls by calendar year and so when I look at this I look at fiscal year '20, 1,800 calls. Fiscal year '23 1,300 calls. Our population has grown a lot since then. I'm just curious kind of from your expertise what do you attribute with a growing population why you are receiving less calls for service? Rosenthal: Yeah. My understanding -- and maybe Director Nixon can actually expand on this, is the -- the -- I believe what happened is the way we collected calls changed, the methodology for reporting a call -- Gilberg: And the staffing that was handling the calls when we were having a transition between directors, they kind of changed the way that they were recording calls that were coming in. I believe that we corrected that and changed it going forward. They were not capturing all the calls that were coming in, so everybody across the board had a decrease. So, if you were to look at -- I mean if -- you can see it there that you guys weren't the only ones that had a decrease, because the total number of calls went down as well. Nixon: Additionally, my recollection is also during that time period we moved to a certain -- a certain number of calls for particularly barking dogs and certain nuisance responses being handled in a slightly different way than a door-to-door -- more of an online and a -- by a phone methodology. So, they are not -- and, unfortunately, they are not directly comparable from these numbers. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I guess, then, that brings the question are there other numbers that are on here that maybe shouldn't be comparable, then, that have been included as -- Nixon: No. I think that's the only thing that we ever changed. Cavener: Okay. And then -- Mr. Mayor. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Do you know -- because it's not reflected here -- what is the total calls for service that you provided to all jurisdictions? Nixon: You know, that's 5,934, 1 believe. Cavener: If it's on there and I missed it. I'm really -- really sorry. Nixon: You know, it's -- it's down there -- the third from the bottom. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 10 of 47 Cavener: Oh. Thank you very much. I totally missed that one. Thank you. I think that's good for me. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Gilberg: Mr. Mayor, may I just add -- I do apologize that this did not get to you guys earlier. We did submit a budget on January 31st, but I'm not sure who that went to. It may not have made it to the Council, but I will definitely make sure you get it earlier in the future. Simison: We received the budget. I think it's the presentation with all the backup information. Councilman Overton, did you have a question? Sorry. I heard your voice. Overton: Mr. Mayor, I was going to ask one question. How is our increase in relation to the increases to the other cities on your contracts? Gilberg: It's about average. It might -- I think it's a little bit lower than some and it might be a little bit higher than like -- I think equals like 5.7 percent and you guys were seven point something percent. I would have to go look, but if you look at the total increase in the total contract, it's nine. The contract income is going up nine percent and yours is only going up seven percent. So, you got -- I mean, again, I feel like Meridian is getting a pretty fair allocation. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe one more. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: And because this is -- to, you know, I think kind of the Mayor's point, we get the numbers and part of the presentation is to get the story to help us understand and so, I apologize, this may come across as an ignorant question, but I might need you to walk me through it, because -- I think you heard Council Member Strader speak to it. Obviously we are -- we are very sympathetic to cities about being able to pay, you know, market wage wages and so that is a consideration certainly that you guys are trying to -- to explore and so I look at it little over 500 bucks per call. Meridian or region wide, about 12, 13 -- almost 13,000 dollars a week for Meridian, which if you are paying somebody 21 dollars an hour -- I'm just trying to figure out what -- I understand -- what -- what is -- what is the City of Meridian taxpayer is going to pay 500 and something dollars per call. Where is that money going to? Gilberg: Councilman and Mayor, I -- I completely understand where you are going with that and let me give you a little bit better background of what that includes. It's not only the officers going out on the calls, there is the people who sit at the front desk. There is the veterinarians who have to spade and neuter and vaccinate the animals that come in. We don't -- and we split -- just so you know, like Doorman, that facility, since we moved part of our operations into our Bird Street facility, is now allocated 60 percent to the animal control contracts and we pay 40 percent of it. That's based on -- consistently and we update every year. The number of animals that we bring in, as like owner surrenders or transfers in versus what's brought in through what we consider to be Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 11 of 47 animal control-related activities. So, for an animal control officer the contracts are covering a hundred percent. They are covering a hundred percent of their costs. They are covering a hundred percent of their vehicles. Their animal control contracts are also covering a hundred percent of the dispatchers and the front desk staff. They are only covering 60 percent of the kennel workers who take care of the animals. A portion of the -- an allocated portion of the veterinarians and the technicians. They are paying a portion of like our media, like I think a third or something like that of our media person, because we are constantly dealing with the angry person who is mad about something that happened with an animal control officer and they are having to deal with that and so -- because I pro rata any administrative type costs a third to animal control and two- thirds to IHS and that's based on the fact that about a third of our employees are related to the animal control functions if you do it on an FTE basis. So, besides the actual salaries, there is the uniforms, there is the insurance, there is the -- the power, there is the vehicle costs -- basically everything that you would need to run an animal control operation stand alone is what we put into that bucket. Some of it a hundred percent, some of it on a pro rata basis. Does that kind of answer your question? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: It provides I think a good explanation to all the -- the resources that are involved. I guess I am still struggling to -- because it's not just -- the Meridian portion that's paying for that, it's -- it's the totality of all of the users that are contributing to that and so you have got -- again political science majors are not great at math -- 114 calls a week. We will split that by five hundred -- five hundred dollars -- that's Iowball for a call. So, that's 57,000 dollars a week in operations. Gilberg: I mean you -- you have to also take into consideration that a call doesn't necessarily equate to an animal. So, besides the calls we also have -- sorry. Give me just a second here. So, the -- the animals serviced -- so, you know, you look at -- we brought in -- we handled seven -- almost 1,700 animals for Meridian and when I say handle the animals that was bringing them in, feeding them, vaccinating them, because you can't keep them in a shelter if they are not vaccinated. Any emergent medical care, whatever. So, there is 1,700 from Meridian. Multiply that by five. So, you know, that's almost 10,000 animals that are taken care of. Some of them for a day, some of them for ten days. So, there is that cost, too. There is the animal cost. So, it's not -- you can't just really calculate it based on calls. Kind of have to also look at animal service, because they are kind of two different buckets. I can go out on a call for a vicious dog and that animal may never enter the shelter. Cavener: Sure. Gilberg: So, there is kind of two different buckets that you are covering. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 12 of 47 Cavener: Yeah. I think that's where probably some of these questions are coming from is I'm responding to the information that you are giving us to a kind of essentially justify the request that you are making and so I'm trying to do the math in my head about -- you want to pay your people more, which we support, but not knowing all of these things and not having that information provided to us, I'm trying to figure out where is the rest of the money going and I'm -- I'm -- that's what I'm trying -- that's where some of these questions are coming. I'm just trying to figure it out. I don't think anyone's playing hide the ball, it's just we haven't been educated about this and we -- we are very protective of the taxpayer dollars, as I know you are aware of, and so making sure that we -- I want to be able -- if -- if I'm a citizen and I see it's costing me as a City of Meridian taxpayer 12,846 dollars a week and there is going to be 25 calls in Meridian, they are going to ask me why am I okay with that? Rosenthal: Council Member, I -- I appreciate the frustration, because I have listened to this sort of frustration for 24 years from council members, because animal control services and shelter services is really expensive -- almost shockingly expensive for small communities. What would assure the Meridian taxpayer is a simple comparison to virtually any peer community across the United States that has this population and has to do this work on their own with their own animal shelter, because that number is going to be in the millions, not sub one millions, but for the City of Meridian to run an animal control program and an animal shelter, which I think everyone would agree every community of this size is going to have to have animal control services. You can't just not have it. And in previous years when I -- when I did some of these presentations I would frequently provide those matrix and we would be happy to do a survey of peer communities to Meridian so you could compare, hey, is Meridian getting a good deal versus other communities across the United States that have this population base and I think you would find that that would be very reassuring to you and the Council Members that you are getting the best possible deal. I would be surprised if we found many, if any, communities that are comparable to Meridian that are paying less. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: And, Dr. Rosenthal, I appreciate that and -- and, frankly, I'm not looking for a deal. I -- I want to be able to explain to my boss why we are spending this money that we are -- and what -- what we are getting in return and this is where the challenge is that the matrix that are provided to us today to justify the request, which is a fairly large increase from when this started, makes it hard for me to feel comfortable that I could explain to them why this was justified and so that's -- I'm not looking for -- not looking to you for a Groupon or a discount code, we want to pay what is fair and it came back to we want to make sure that your staff -- I'm a firm believer -- we want to make sure that our Meridian employees are paid not just living wages, but wages that they can be proud of, that I can be proud of. I know you want that for your people, too. It's not about that. It's helping us understand. You are the experts. We are not. And if we are not provided the information I can't -- I can't just say it's nice to meet you, Leann. Nice Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 13 of 47 to meet you, Dr. Rosenthal, thanks for being here. Whatever you are telling us I'm just going to say Dr. Rosenthal said it was a good deal, so it should be okay, taxpayers. can't do that. Gilberg: I think part of the challenge is that -- Rosenthal: We can provide any more information that you require. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I understand the concerns expressed by our two other councilmen, but I remember when we started this contract and I stood where you are and I pitched it to the city as a member of the police department. The very first time we handed over the two animal control vans and we put the cost analysis in front of City Council at that time on the three to five million dollar building we would have to build and staff and run to have anything close to what you provided to the entire community. I think trying to break that cost down into something as simple as a -- how much per call for service doesn't tell the whole story, just as it wouldn't tell the whole story if we took the cost of a police budget and divided it up between the police calls for service, because there is so much more that goes on behind the scenes. I think you don't -- maybe you don't spell it out enough, all the things and the time you do with the shelter, all the pets that you take in that has nothing to do with a call for service that are dropped off. All the animals that are -- that are dropped off from people in other communities belong to owners in Meridian. The animals that are found in Meridian that belong to owners in other parts of the city or other cities that you guys take the time to take care of, feed, handle and find their owners and get them back to. The idea is you have a very comprehensive approach that goes far beyond just the call for service and how you handle these animals. Rosenthal: Thank you, Councilman Overton. I also add that in recent years moving more and more to our community policing model, one of the frustrations we have is the -- the fact of the matter is that when we go out on a call and we don't issue a citation and we work on owner education and we are providing resources or providing problem solving and mediating between angry people, because largely what we are doing is -- often has somewhat less to do with the animal that you might suspect and more to do with neighbors that are at war with each other. This is actually a longer, more time consuming, resource intensive in that way, because time is money process. So, back in the day we used to very much pound on all these citations we have issued and -- and so forth and what I would encourage you to think about is when we go out and do these warnings they are -- they are -- they are -- it's a lot longer and more expensive a process, quite frankly, than just issuing the citation and driving away. But, you know, piling up more work on the legal folks here, it's not worth it and actually not solving problems getting people to get along and, you know, if we go out and we spend the time working with people and figuring out what the problem is and how can we just get this Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 14 of 47 solved and actually solve the problem for the long term, so we are not going out time after time after time and not getting anywhere and not really accomplishing what I think you folks want, which is this is all about making the community more harmonious. Animals are an integral part of it and for the most part they are force for good, but sometimes they are force of division and decreasing quality of life issues. So, that's one may -- possibly part of the frustration is when you look at matrix they don't necessarily, as Councilman Overton is sort of suggesting, indicate the full scope of it all and what the City of Meridian is getting actually is, essentially, their own animal shelter. It's a portion of it. Instead of buying their own animal shelter they are basically paying for a portion of it and -- and I think the cost savings are -- are indisputable really. Gilberg: Mr. Mayor and Councilmen, even more recently than what Councilman Overton was referring to when IHS originally took on the contract, around 2021 1 believe when we were moving into our other facility and there was going to be an increase in the cost because of the allocation of the Dorman facility, Meridian did a very in-depth analysis of what the cost would be to do their own shelter and I -- they quickly determined that it was much more cost effective to continue to contract with IHS. If that helps. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just to chime in, I know the Finance Department is willing to -- as they do for all of our budgeting requests -- they are happy to update that analysis for us each year that it does show a cost savings, but they will be happy to provide that. I think it would be very helpful to sort of breakdown the cost per call for future information, just the cost per call, what percentage of that is allocated to -- to different, you know, personnel, overhead, whatever it is and, then, I think if you could compare Meridian to the other cities on that basis I think that would be helpful for us, so that we can kind of understand how -- how that's kind of playing out. Gilberg: Council Woman, when you say compared to other cities, are you talking about financially or calls, because we -- we issue a report every January and, again, I can get you a copy of that that shows all the different contracting agencies and what calls they have had and how many animals we have handled and it has all of those in it and we issue that every January. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I -- I think all the information is helpful, but I think, you know, breaking down the cost per call per city I think would be also enlightening for us, so that we can see, you know, if -- I understand how you are sort of -- you are -- you are allocating -- you are trying to allocate your contract between the different cities it sounds like based Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 15 of 47 on the volume; right? But I think it would be helpful to double check, you know, is Meridian getting a good rate on a per call kind of basis compared to the other cities. Any kind of those sort of matrix I think are helpful and, -- you know, I mean I get it, the the personnel costs -- like we really do understand, because we are facing a similar we face similar dilemmas here, especially with inflation, but, you know, again, like we have to do the same thing, like we are really stretching to control our own costs in every kind of facets. So, you know, I expect -- I expect you all to do the same and if you provide us more detailed information about your operating budget, then, that allows us to, you know, provide helpful suggestions as well. Gilberg: I do appreciate that and we can do better with that. One of the parameters that -- typically when we do these type of comparisons is cost per capita and you will see that at the bottom of -- I don't know what page it is. It's a page with the Meridian cost share portions. You can see that your cost in fiscal year '20 was $4.43 per capita. In fiscal year '23 it was $4.51 per capita and I'm guessing it's going to be right around that -- it says 4.82 in fiscal year '24, but that's without increasing the population base, because we didn't have the updated population numbers. So, the cost per capita has continued to stay relatively stable. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. It's just -- I don't -- and don't take this wrong way. I don't really trust that matrix in isolation, because to Councilman Cavener's point, your calls for Meridian -- now, granted, some methodology has changed, so I don't fully understand that, but if Meridian residents are using your facilities less than I would actually expect the cost per capita to be going down -- Gilberg: If our costs went down. Strader: If your cost went down. Yeah. But I mean, again, it's like our population is going up; right? Like our population has expanded dramatically. So, I would still expect the cost per capita to start going down, because we are spreading a bunch of overhead across a bigger base of population. So, I -- I don't know, I'm a little bit -- I -- I guess I just -- I don't know if I want to say they are like red flags. So, I just -- I see some concerns about help me understand the calls that you are actually getting. Why -- why have those gone down compared to where they were and -- and try to compare on some kind of a basis that's fair, which I think cost per call would make sense -- and I don't even know what the answer is, I just want to see it. You know, what's the cost per call per city, break that down into some different components and provide a more detailed operating budget. I mean that would be very helpful. You know, I sympathize, I mean driving a vehicle 300,000 miles stinks, you know. Strader family uses Mint Mobile and I have got a computer that I'm -- it's ten years old and I'm hoping to make it to 15, you know, so I get it. But, you know, we also have to -- we all have to control our Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 16 of 47 costs in this environment. I mean and the taxes -- to Luke's point, it's like the taxpayers are going to ask us these questions, so we need have a good answer. Thanks. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just one more if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Along with that information I think it would also be good to get an average call time. What is the response time to Meridian and how does that compare with the rest of the region. That was something I had real concerns with about a number of years ago. I was getting a lot of complaints. I haven't got those anymore, so my hope is, hey, you guys have addressed that and it's went down. Again, having less calls for Meridian than you had maybe four or five years ago is probably also -- freed some of that capacity up, but I'm -- I'm very interested in understanding -- to -- to Dr. Rosenthal's point, if we all are in this together, then, I want to make sure that our Meridian residents are getting the same type of response as our neighbors in Boise, as our neighbors in Star and Eagle, that we are -- we are all getting the same level of service if we are all being asked to pay the same amount. Gilberg: We -- we do provide that information monthly. Simison: Council, any additional questions? All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate you being here. Gilberg: Thank you. 17. Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Update and Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request Simison: Next item up is Item 17, which is Valley Regional Transit update and fiscal year 2025 budget request. Welcome, Elaine, to the podium. Clegg: Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here and -- and I have behind me Kate Dahl, who is our principal planner, somebody -- the supervisor of Stephen Hunt, gave him a vacation and he is off on his way to Europe. So, he is not here to help us today. But Kate will fill in very well I'm certain. Really appreciate the opportunity to come talk to you about our budget. Sorry, I'm trying to -- there we go. So, I'm going to give you an overview of the budget process that we follow, a little overview of VRT, what we have been up to, the services that you all get from us, the ridership that -- that corresponds with that and, then, go into our budget request. So, the 2025 budget request -- and you should have received these numbers some time ago, but -- oops. I went the wrong direction. There we go. You did not receive this presentation and next year we will try to get it to you earlier. Did want to talk a little bit about the timing of the process and some changes that we have instituted. Used to be that you would simply get the budget request and not much else. I sent a letter to all of you in April. I'm hoping that next year will come in in March and in that letter tried to give an overview of the things that -- not Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 17 of 47 just Valley Regional Transit does overall, but how it impacts Meridian specifically. Then shared the preliminary funding request and now we are in the discussions about that. You will finalize your budget. One of the things -- another thing that we have changed this year is as soon as you finalize your budget and send it to certification we know what number is in it, we will send a cooperative agreement draft and ask that you finalize that once your budget is certified, so that we actually have a certified budget before the fiscal year starts, instead of after. Would be nice. So, an overview of what we do. VRT has 43 direct staff and 149 contract staff. We have four facilities, including the administrative offices here in Meridian. The base in Boise at the airport at Orchard and in Canyon county at Happy Day and, then, of course, Main Street station in downtown Boise. We have a fleet of 45 large buses and 39 smaller buses. We also have a fleet of 25 vans and 16 support vehicles. We have increased ridership since COVID by 19 percent. As of last year, if we look at this year's numbers, we are confident that by the end of 2024 we will be above the numbers that we had pre-COVID. Really really excited about that. We provide fixed route services and on-demand services. I will talk about those. We also provide paratransit services to persons with disabilities and this year we started a new service called Beyond Access, which is for both older adults and persons with disabilities who are outside the access service zone. Again, really excited about that. Other things that particularly are of interest in Meridian are The Village van, the Rides to Wellness, some of the transit connections and Lyft Late Night rides, as well as opportunities to participate in our transportation demand program, which allows employers to buy passes for all of their -- all of their employees. So, a week and a half ago he did a big service change. Some of you may have noticed. We have new signs everywhere. But most importantly we have consolidated services into more frequent services in the places where we know we have people. We have increased trips between Meridian and Nampa and Boise. We -- I will show you in a minute why we are really excited about those and what we think they will do and we have upgraded our branding -- new sign blades and information holders at all of our stops. So, these are the new sign blades. Some of you may have seen them on some of the stops around town. Next to it is an information sheet. It used to be when you came to a stop you maybe saw the sign. There was no other information. Every stop now has this information sheet, which tells you what route is being served there or routes and the stops along that route. Gives you a QR code to go for more information and tells you what the fair is, all of those things. This is a really exciting upgrade that we are pretty proud of in the system. We have got a lot of good feedback already. In addition -- and you will see this in just a minute -- we redesigned all of the brochures. Those brochures also have a lot more information on them. So, one quick thing about this sign. You will notice that it has the stop ID number. Previously if you were out of stop and you called customer service you had to try to explain to the person where you were. Let's see. I'm at the corner of -- I think it's south and east. Now you just say, oh, I'm at AB211 and customer service says, oh, I know exactly where you are. It's really really helpful. The routes are shown by color according to frequencies. So, anything in green comes every 15 minutes at least four hours a day, most of them six hours a day. Anything in white and blue comes either 30 -- every 30 minutes or every 60 minutes, but all day and anything in purple is peak hour only. So, again, at a glance you can say here is -- her is what kind of I can expect at this stop. Meridian used to have the Route 30. Still does. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 18 of 47 We have changed it up a little. It also has the 40, the 42 and the 2045. What's not on this one -- and I apologize we missed that new route that serves between Town Square Mall in The Village. Route 24. We will talk about it. And, then, all of these specialized services, which also move a lot of people around Meridian. Here is an example of the new brochures, new timetables, new maps that show all of the stops. The old maps didn't used to show that. Some points of interest along the way on each of the routes. Then on the other side is information about how to use the bus system. That's a lot more detailed than we used to have. So, Route 30 statistics. In FY-24 or '23 there were 3,000 boardings. It's growing. It's been a little slow, but given how it started with COVID and everything we are actually pretty pleased with it. I'm sorry. FY-25 is the 3,000 boardings and I will explain to you why that's lower. FY-23, which is the year we have final numbers for, we had 5,219 boardings and, again, as I say, that's been growing maybe a little lower than we would like, but getting there. With the service change we combined it in a sense with the 45 -- the 45 now goes all the way from downtown Boise to downtown Nampa. It follows the Route 30 through the middle of Meridian and between the Route 30 and the Route 45 there is service every half hour, every 30 minutes for five and a half hours a day. That's a big change. We think overall in aggregate that there will be an increase between the two routes of 40 -- 52 percent in boardings and we expect a lot of those to be in Meridian itself. So, last year the Route 45 had also had about 5,200 boardings. With the new Route 45 combined with the 30, again, in aggregate the two will be 16,000 boardings a year according to our projections and that ridership increase is pretty dramatic and we are excited about this. What the Route 45 does is offer residents of Meridian direct access to CWI in downtown Boise in ways that they didn't used to have it. It would take -- transfer most cases to get too many of those places. The Route 24 is the new route that is -- serves between Town Square Mall and The Village. This is service hours that used to be fully within Boise. Oh, I might note before we leave this, so you will notice that your service assessment is actually down a little bit and that's because we moved trips to the Route 45, which also is paid for by both city of Boise, CWI, and the city of Nampa, as well as Meridian and so your share of your costs on the 45 went down. The 24 is mostly within Boise. It is service that used to be fully paid for by Boise and went in the West Valley neighborhood from the Town Square Mall to the Idaho State campus. We are now serving that campus from the Chinden route and the Glenwood route and instead move this service east-west between the Town Square Mall and The Village. It will run every hour all day. So, it's not real frequent service, but, again, it's consistent service for residents of City of Meridian who need to get into Boise. Once you get to the Town Square Mall you can see there are connections to routes that go all over the city. So, again, pretty excited about this one. We expect a lot of boardings on this route. We will see if it comes through, but we expect this route to perform really well. The Route 40 is an express route between cities that goes from Happy Day Transit Center to downtown Boise. Ridership on this route has been increasing over the last number of years and with this change we expect it to increase even more from 14,000 to almost 20,000. It is -- sorry. I'm looking. There is a -- a number on here that I want to share. Thirty percent -- excuse me -- of the households who will be served by this route, 14 -- there is 14,700 households within half a mile of it and 21 percent of those only have one car, while -- or 37 percent of those only have one car, 21 percent of those live in poverty. That's why Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 19 of 47 this route is such an important one and as you can see we are expecting a 38 percent increase in ridership with the redesign of this route and its ability now to reach so many destinations that we know people are looking to get to. Route 42 is also redesigned and it is now a local all day service from Happy Day all the way into downtown Boise. Again, citizens on the south side of Meridian have not had that all day service into either city previously and while it's only once an hour, just the consistency of it at least begins to let people begin to plan to use it. Because of those changes we expect a 41 percent increase in ridership on this redesigned route. So, the services that are serving Meridian are the ones that we really expect to see the highest increases in ridership on in many cases, other than the Fairview frequent route, which went to 15 minute service inside the city of Boise. The routes in Meridian are the ones that are seeing -- projected to have the highest increases. Access is a service for persons with disabilities. It's a curb-to-curb service -- or, actually, a door-to-door service. Excuse me. That is a guaranteed ride. If you live within three-quarters of a mile of a fixed route and with the changes now you have more service area within the City of Meridian that is eligible for this. We have a number of riders signed up in Meridian. We haven't seen a lot of uptake yet. So, one of the things we have been talking about is what we can do to market this service to the people who really need it, because it is one that could be very useful to the people within that area who do need it. Our Beyond Access Service is one that replaces previously -- service that was previously provided by Harvest and a small amount of service that was provided in Meridian by SHIP or Supportive Housing Services program. Those -- together those two programs provided 30 -- together those programs, as well as other senior centers across the valley and metro community services provided 31 ,000 trips last year. So, the changes this year are that Valley Regional Transit is directly operating the services that used to be provided by Harvest and by SHIP. The Meridian senior centers you will see in a minute still provides separate service on its own. We also provide services that used to be provided by the Star Senior Center, the Eagle Senior Center and Metro Community Services is the partner in this. The result of that instead of having very discrete, small service areas is that a person can travel all the way from southeast Boise to almost Parma on this service that previously wasn't available. The beauty for Meridian being right in the middle of the valley is now your residents have access to almost anywhere in the valley on this service. It is a qualified service. You have to be an older adult or a person with disabilities, but if you are qualified and you live outside of access -- regular access service area, you can use the Beyond Access services. So far we have provided since January 14,467 rides on this service, 3,335 of those have been within Meridian. So, again, pretty excited about this service. Meridian Senior Center continues to -- to provide services in -- to seniors in Meridian. You don't pay for any of that. Area Agency on Aging provides the local match, which is about 18,000 dollars -- a little more than 18,000 and Valley Regional Transit provides the federal match for that, which is 73,000. So, you get almost 90,000 dollars' worth of services from this that moves older adults around the city. Last year there were a little over 8,000 boardings. Lyft Late Night is a service for particularly service workers. It's an income qualified service. If you can get to or from work on a regular fixed route bus you can -- and you qualify income wise, you can use this service to get a Lyft home or two for only three dollars if it's anywhere within the service area shown. The red outline is an addition to the service area that we Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 20 of 47 made with these changes. Recognizing that there are a lot of service employers along that Overland corridor and so this new service will -- will serve that corridor we think quite well. Here is an overall view of the ridership and the ridership as it was experienced in Meridian on the routes that serve you. So, in 2023 out of 112,000 total rides on the services that somehow touch Meridian, almost 40,000 of those rides were Meridian residents. We think you are getting a pretty good deal for the services that you are paying for. So, our budget request this year. Our assessment is broken down in four different ways. The general assessment is regional overhead. That pays for the administrative services, planning, those kinds of things that happen over at this office here in Meridian. As you can see your general assessment actually went down a little bit last year, even though your population grew, because it is a calculation based on both population and service miles and service hours and because of the change in service hours on the 30 and the reduction there you guys are actually going to pay just a little bit less for that. Your service assessment similarly went down because of -- for those same reasons. The capital assessment -- we don't have a lot of rolling stock or other capital that we are buying this year. I would note that we are trying to -- I'm trying to figure out a way to normalize the capital assessment, so it isn't so lumpy. It's down a little bit this year. One would expect it will be up next year as a -- as a result. So, over this next planning year I'm working with staff to see if we can figure out a way to normalize that. Where there is an increase is in the services. That's the Beyond Access, Rides to Wellness, the rides to the VA, the VA shuttle and, sorry, there is one other that's included in that and I'm forgetting what it is. Oh, the medical transportation. All of those have increased kind of dramatically, frankly, this year because of the increases we have seen in cost. We think we have done a really good job trying to keep costs down everywhere we could. This is one place -- we had to eat some of those increases this year. We would expect that again to normalize next year because we have been able to -- we think to absorb what those increases will be with this -- this request this year. Overall we are only asking for a one percent increase from the City of Meridian. We think the value that you are getting for our services is good. We are excited about the future. We think that with the increases we expect in ridership that value will grow without asking for more money, at least this year. Not very much more money. We hope in the future that if you are interested we will be able to grow because we have negotiated with you additional services, not because our costs go up, but because you actually get more out of it. So, with that our request this year is 880,293 dollars and we are hopeful that if you have any questions we can answer them. Simison: Thank you, Elaine. Council, any questions? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Elaine, thank you. That was a fantastic presentation and I'm -- I'm really happy to see all the positive changes that you have done with VRT over this past year. Just the simple changes on the signs and how much that's going to help people know where they are at, know where they are going, know what's available. Seeing these Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 21 of 47 ridership numbers continue to grow -- I'm always thinking about transportation and knowing that as those ridership numbers continue to grow that means future -- or less vehicles on our roadways at a time when those numbers are climbing at a steady rate. So, I'm glad to see that that's happening. I also appreciate -- we have talked before about how you are modifying those routes to try to meet the areas as we are building and some of our heavier and more denser areas you are already working on those routes to service those areas and I think it's a fantastic job and I appreciate it very much. Clegg: Thank you. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Thank you. And first let me say congratulations on your nomination. It's a Senate confirmed position; right? Clegg: Thank you. Yeah. That Senate confirmation process could be a bugger, but hopefully -- Taylor: Yeah. Clegg: -- it will go well. Taylor: Well, I spent five years as a Senate staffer, so I know. Good luck. It is the presidential election year, so you might be hanging out there for a while, but I think it's great and congratulations. Hopefully it ends well for you. A couple questions. I -- I just had on the special -- the how -- how do we pay for the Beyond Access program? And, then, is that part of the -- if you want -- could you go to that last slide that you were on. So, the special assessment line where it says it's negotiated, can you just explain what that is? And, then, like some of these programs, like Beyond Access is that -- is that part of that budget line and just kind of -- if you can elaborate a little bit on that. Clegg: I will and I don't know that I have too much more detail than what I can tell you in terms of what it is -- is included in that, but -- as well. So, the negotiated special assessment includes Beyond Access. Beyond Access is paid for in part by the Area Agency on Aging. We get a grant from them. Our grant this year was down 100,000 dollars overall across all of Ada county -- Ada and Canyon counties, frankly, and so part of what you are doing is helping make up that difference. Part of that comes from the feds, part of that from the state. But without -- without the full local match we would not be able to maximize the federal money that we have and provide as much service as we would otherwise. Rides to Wellness is paid for by the service -- the healthcare service providers and it's seen a dramatic increase in ridership and we are not asking you for any more money for that, but as a result some of the rides that -- that might have gone on it are going to be on access to the VA service and the medical transportation Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 22 of 47 services, which you do help pay for. All of those have gone up -- not because -- not just because the costs are up, but because the number of rides we are providing is up. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: One more follow up. So, one thing that's kind of interesting -- and I think I'm seeing this a little bit in some of these new services. One of the challenges with a public transportation system is the convenience for people. I lived in Washington DC that had wonderful -- but it was still really inconvenient; right? I rode the -- I got on a bus, took me to the Metro. In the summer I would just sweat in the humidity. It was lovely. Great system, you know, still kind of inconvenient. Obviously, that's one of the challenges probably with ridership is the -- you know, if you live close to walk that's great, but a lot of people don't. So, one thing I have -- I like what I'm seeing is like the late night lift guaranteed, you know, that's -- I think that is really smart kind of an innovative approach. Some of these other programs -- because I see to me the future of public transportation, I -- it's hard for me to envision the public transportation system that we have today in 20 years being the same. I see almost like a switch where instead of trying to get people places, services, jobs, groceries, things are being brought to people, so I think supplementing a transportation system that focuses on where the people live, main quarters, as many people as you can, but, then, connecting people to the -- the routes with these sort of innovative approaches I guess. So, I guess my question is -- I'm fascinated with the idea of leveraging Lyft, Uber, other rideshare services as a way to get people to that, because I think that would really dramatically help. Like -- I mean if I could call an Uber and I could get to a bus station in a few minutes and know that I'm going to get there a few minutes before and it picked me up and take me, I would be much more likely to use it. So, could you speak to that a little bit and kind of some of your thinking and -- and where things are going with that? Clegg: Sure. So, if -- if I had my own computer with me I would -- I would slip to a slide from another slide deck. The city of Boise was able to go after a grant and I believe that grant was -- was through United Way, but I -- I may be wrong. I can't remember for sure. And with that grant and some money from the city of Boise -- in addition to Lyft, Late Night in Boise, we also offer Lyft Connections and Lyft Connection is for two dollars up to an eight dollar ride total, you are guaranteed to be picked up within a five minute walk of wherever you are and dropped off at the nearest large transit stop. Not just any transit stop. We have got 57 in the Boise system that we have chosen. That service used to be very narrow. When we made this service change we more than doubled the service area of -- of the Lyft Connections and as a result we are already seeing a big update -- uptick in use getting from wherever you are to the convenient transit. So, then, you can take the rest of your ride. I do see that as an opportunity in the City of Meridian, especially as we have begun offering these more robust fixed route services, at least they run all day, those kinds of things. I think we would -- we would be happy to work with you and your staff to see if there is a similar grant that we could get that -- that might start something similar to that in Meridian if you guys are interested. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 23 of 47 Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I mean I -- I'm always interested to see the information and evaluate it. I think it could never hurt to have that. I'm not sure if this year is the year to take that on, but I think we should definitely take a look at that. I -- I want to compliment you on optimizing the service for Meridian. I really appreciate the work that you have done. The signage is great. I -- I think especially just sort of fixing the routes and the frequency of the routes has been fantastic and also thank you for providing the letter in advance of our budgeting process. You probably heard that that is a point of frustration sometimes, but thank you for doing that. I just wanted to -- the only piece I'm still not totally understanding -- it could be a follow up, but I would like to get just a further breakdown of the special assessment, the components of that as a follow-up to this meeting. I think that would be extremely helpful and, then, you know, I wanted to say a one percent increase is very much appreciated this year and I think that's very reasonable. So, it seems like it's moving in the right direction. I definitely agree getting ridership up is critical. You know, helping make sure that the service is successful. So, hopefully, we will get there. Thanks for your work. Clegg: And I will, in fact, follow up and get you more breakdown on that special assessment. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I think I have had my 10th or 11th VRT presentation that I have seen. By far the best. I -- I have been known at times to be a little prickly from the dais. It's not my intention, but it comes across that way and I recall years ago asking VRT to look at your work from a local government perspective and we are seeing that today. I appreciate that you are calling out ridership on routes. You are not resting on your laurels. Saying we have way more to do. I commend you for saying this is our projection. This is what we are shooting for. It makes it really easy for me to continue to be supportive. That said, you inherited a real challenge with COVID and how that has impacted ridership and I believe the changes you are making are to address that. I am really looking forward to you being before us next year and saying this is what we projected, not only did we meet it, we exceeded it or we got nearly here, but we overexceeded here and those were kind of connected. One point. I appreciate you painting the picture for us and letting us know. I'm really proud that we have brought public transit to Meridian, but it -- as a budget -- you know this from your past experience -- it is a challenge for us to look at it year over year and make sure that this is the right decision for us for the taxpayers. I'm excited we have public transit. I'm also very critical of the system and I want to make sure that it's meeting not just the riders, but the taxpayers as a whole. So, I'm just forecasting that for you next year that if the -- there are a few more arrows coming at you -- I don't want to do that. I hope that -- that you are able to say -- just Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 24 of 47 throw them right back at me, because you guys are kicking so much butt. That said I'm going to ask you a question as a friend, but it's a question I get a lot. Clegg: Sure. Cavener: There is a perception amongst some in Meridian that the reason our VRT buses are wrapped is because VRT doesn't want anybody to see that there is nobody inside. Now, ridership isn't where we want it to be, but I -- I recall a time when we had a route in Meridian that did sit empty for weeks at a time. We are not in that season anymore. Talk a little bit more about what you are doing to attract what I kind of call riders of choice, people that you -- you want people to choose to leave their car at home or go to a park and ride and ride the bus. So, give us a little flavor of that. Clegg: Thank you. Well, thank you for the kudos first of all and I appreciate the questions as always. You know that. So, let me say one thing first and there -- there always is this, you know, gosh, I see empty buses. What's wrong? And it's true. There are some empty buses. There is also some buses who have a lot of people on them. And so I -- those buses are usually on State Street or Vista or now Fairview. Hopefully the 45 will begin to be one of those buses. What I often ask people when I hear that question is do you live on a cul-de-sac? Anybody? Okay. And is your street empty 97 percent of the day? Cavener: Ninety-nine percent of the day. Clegg: Access services require lots of service in places where you don't get a lot of riders that, then, connect to the services that do and so in some cases you will see buses that don't have a lot of people on them, just like you see roads that don't have a lot of cars on them in those places that are just providing access. On the other hand, on those buses that should be providing a lot of rides, we ought to see a lot of riders and what we are doing to attract that is is lots of things, but you mentioned some of them. The -- the signs. I can't tell you how many people have said there is a bus route there? I didn't know that. Now I do. How cool. So, making it obvious that there is actually a bus route there. Giving them information. I used to -- my son lives right by the Fred Meyer on Chinden and I would be there and I see somebody waiting at that bus stop, knowing that the only bus that came there was peak hour and it was the middle of the day. There was not going to be a bus and I would go talk to them and say do you know there is no bus coming? Well, it says it's a bus stop. Now, everybody has that information at the bus stop. Once they get there they can see that. We are doing an inventory right now -- Kate is leading that -- of our bus stops and which ones have the correct amenities, which ones don't. I'm happy to say that the first phase, which is the biggest one hundred bus stops, are the ones that serve the most riders, that are very high percent of those that have shelters, that have trash cans, that have bike racks, that have all of the amenities we would like to see so it really attracts riders. The next phase will be bus stops that aren't quite as highly used and we expect -- we will see that many of those don't have those amenities and so previously VRT had a budget line item for bus stop improvements and it was just the same amount of money every year and not Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 25 of 47 any real -- you know, just as things came up things would get done, which is not a bad way to do it, but what we are going to look at is over a five year period what are the improvements we know we need to make? How much would those cost? If we go after a discretionary grant to pay for those, which I am confident we could get, how much local match would we need to get all those done? I don't think it will be more than what we were budgeting previously. I just think it will be a different way to do it and we will be able to plan to get all of those amenities done that we identify in this next phase. We know those amenities make a difference to riders. The other thing we are doing we are putting art on bus shelters. You guys are getting one very soon. Two of them actually. It's going to be very cool. I'm very excited about that. In addition, each of the shelters now is going to have a route map. So, again, just information you use to go -- you didn't know what routes were there. Now you see the whole system. If there is a shelter once we get that completed and, then, finally, we have really leaned into using Main Street Station and the Town Square Mall and hopefully ultimately the Happy Day transit center more effectively by increasing the signage there, the wayfinding, letting people know how to use the system. We have applied for a grant at Town Square Mall for bathrooms and a break room for the drivers and on-route charging, some things like that. It won't be overnight, but we know all of those things ultimately will lead to more riders, because they are more -- more choice riders, because it's more attractive to ride. And, hopefully, that answered your question. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Taylor: Mayor and Elaine, can you just give me a general sense of what the local match is when you go after these federal or state dollars? Just a percentage on average. Clegg: Sure. And it's good to see you, by the way, and congratulations. I haven't seen you since -- since your appointment. So, great -- great to see you here. I know you will do great as a -- in this phase of your public service. So, local match on capital projects is 20/80. Unlike highways, which is seven and three-quarters and 92 and so buying buses, buying, you know, shelters, doing the bus stop enhancements, those kinds of things. Match on service is only 50/50 in the small urban area, which is Nampa- Caldwell and is 50/50 only up to a certain percent of our federal funding in the larger urban area, which is the Boise-Meridian area. So, overall in our budget we get close to 14 million a year from local cities and counties. We -- or 13 -- excuse me. We earned over a million in fares last year. That's directly generated revenue. We expect to earn almost a million in advertising this year. That goes to why do we have those wraps on the buses. It's not to cover up whether there is riders or not, it's to earn money and we are earning a lot of money on it and, then, we get -- for operations. All of that goes toward operations. We get about 12 million a year in federal funding to match that. If you are in Canyon county you would be paying a little bit less a percentage, because the match there is -- is more generous. But overall we are -- we do about 45/55 -- 55 local, 45 federal on the operations. On the flip side on the capital it is an 80/20 and often if we apply for discretionary grants we get actually a little bit better match rate. So, Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 26 of 47 on the raise grant that we have got in Ada county right now on State Street, it's a 15/85 match. Does that help? Whitlock: Thank you. Clegg: And overall that's about another ten million. So, total budget around 35 million. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, Elaine, I just would like to add my thanks. You and I have had many conversations over the years on transportation and it's great to see you leading the charge to really get the needle moving and make such progress and I look forward to what is to come. I knew things were changing when I saw that one of my son's 27, 28 year old friends was leaving his F-150 pickup at home and taking transit to and from work. So, that's a hard age to impact, so thank you. Clegg: Great story. Glad to hear it. Thank you. Simison: Well -- well, to piggyback off that comment -- and I don't know if you have the data or if you will have the data or not, but 45,000 rides on a route can be anything from 90 people commuting to and from work every day or it can be 45,000 unique rides. Clegg: Yeah. Simison: Do we have any idea how many -- how many different riders there are within the system? Are we servicing a hundred people, 150 people? Five hundred people on these routes? Do we have any way to track that yet or will we? Clegg: We -- we can -- we can surmise it from the boardings and the lightings and the location of that. We don't have it exactly. The way we do our passenger counts is an automatic laser system, so we don't do face recognition. We can't say that's a unique individual. I -- you know, it's a great question, Mayor, and I don't have an answer for you. I can tell you on specific routes where we have looked at it what it is, but we -- that's an answer I will go ask Alyssa to start working on and see if we can get -- Simison: I think it would be important for us. You know, again, what's the cost per -- Clegg: Unique rider. Simison: -- unique rider is a lot in the same way the conversation you just heard about dog owners -- Clegg: Yeah. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 27 of 47 Simison: -- and the cost. Clegg: I can tell you this much, we dug into it. City of Nampa had some very specific questions and I don't have the presentation right before me, but my memory is there were close to 5,000 unique riders over this -- all the services that we provided in the city of Nampa. Simison: Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate you being here. Clegg: Thank you. Simison: Great seeing you walking around downtown. Clegg: I love walking -- this is a great downtown to walk around. I really love it. Thank you. 18. Ada County Highway District Linder Road Concept Study, Pine to Ustick Simison: Thank you. Up next will be item -- Council, are you good to go? Do you want me to take a break for any reason? All right. Then with that we will move on to Item 18, which is the Ada County Highway District Linder Road concept study, Pine to Ustick. We will welcome Brooke Green to the podium. Green: Thank you, Mayor, Council. It's a privilege to be before you. For the record I'm Brooke Green. I'm a planner there at Ada County Highway District. This is I think my second time presenting this project to you. I'm here tonight to give you an overview of our past public engagement opportunity that we conducted this past December. I'm going to briefly go over the alternatives that we took out to the public as I see we have got some new Council folks who were not here last time and, then, I'm going to talk about the cost and the next steps. So, moving along, one of the things I do want to highlight with this project is our engagement and it's one thing to note that the engagement we took on this project is a little bit different than we have done in the past. Recognizing Linder is very unique. It's got a lot of front-on housing and that was important for us to be able to engage with those residents one on one and I will tell you when we came into this engagement opportunity originally we wanted to start just with general public outreach, but I will tell you I have done over 61 one-on-one meetings with your residents here in your community. I have gotten to know them quite personally. I have met their whole family. So, these one-on-one opportunities -- and we had some really difficult discussions. Oftentimes -- I have met with each one of these residents at least three times. At minimum maybe once or twice, depending on the respondents, and this last time the real hard questions were asked more or less worst case scenario what would happen, because when we do projects such as this, especially with Linder, we are talking about 36 potential homes that ACHD may end up having to purchase and so there is -- evening meetings are quite emotional. They are taxing. Believe me. But one thing I can hope is that we are not going to have a lot of surprises based off of Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 28 of 47 what decision you pick, because we were upfront and we were honest and I call that out, because what I'm going to go over today is the result of that public engagement that took place this past December and it will tell you where the public is leaning on this project. So, with that being said I want to go ahead and talk you through the project itself. So, the project is no further north than Ustick Road, no further west than Pine Avenue. I'm sorry. No further south than Pine Avenue. But some highlights, some attractors along the corridor -- you have got Tully Park, which is a large attractor. You have got Barbara Morgan Elementary School and you have Meridian High School and all of those attractors were taken into account with these alternatives we put forward. The path to adoption -- we have been at this for several years now. We started in December 2022 with our first public outreach. That was just a survey. In January 2023 that's when we started doing our data collection and modeling. This is also when we started to start doing our public engagement. We sent two letters to each property that was going to be impacted along this corridor. So, if I thought that their houses were potentially going to have some encroachment, I sent them a letter. If they didn't respond to my first letter I sent them a second letter. So, we really did engage. As you continue on we did our concept development. I have been before you before to introduce this project. This past April I had this exact same presentation provided to our Ada County Highway District Commission, as well as I had presented to the Meridian Transportation Committee. So, that brings us to where we are at today, which is in June. It is the goal, based off of what happens this evening and the next recommendation, that we take this to adoption later this summer or early fall. So, quickly just go and recap what those three alternatives were. What you are seeing before you was the three lane with a shared use road. Note. The shared use road is only between the pinch point along the corridor. That pinch point is at Sandalwood Drive and Chateau Drive. This was an alternative we put forward to be able to minimize the property impacts. I'm going to walk you through briefly each one of these. I don't want to spend too much time, but do want to highlight some of -- some of the enhancements for those folks who are new to the Council. So, starting off I'm going to bring your attention there to West Pine Avenue and the main attractor there at the top of the slide, that's the Meridian High School. This is the existing footprint. So, what you are seeing here is the four lanes. This is what you see today outside of Meridian High School, but some enhancements that we do -- we did suggest and we are making along the corridor is you are going to see a lot of pedestrian enhancements for good reason. You have got an elementary school, you have got a park and you have got a high school and right now the pedestrian facilities, based off of all the conversations I have had, aren't very comfortable. So, that first enhancements, that modified pedestrian hybrid beacon to help facilitate kids who are getting across the school there and at which point you are going to see the lane is going to reduce back to its existing footprint, which is that two lanes through the rest of the corridor. But to ensure access management -- control of access management we are making some suggestions for landscape medians. This is in alignment with -- and in partnership with the City of Meridian. Their tree landscape is what we are suggesting continue along the corridor and I wanted to draw your attention to the first of several homes that will be impacted. This circle here doesn't necessarily mean we are purchasing those homes, but I want to highlight that those three homes -- or four homes, because of the way we get close to their -- to their property, we made a Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 29 of 47 suggestion at that location, rather than continuing the multi-use pathway on that segment, to actually cross people across the street if they want to continue on the multi- use pathway and continue across Cherry Lane. Anything less than that, if we were to do a multi-use pathway, we would be looking to purchase in this alternative. Continuing along the corridor, this is where we are going to start getting to the pinch point and this is going to see where you are going to see two of our suggested roundabouts. Chateau Drive -- I'm sorry -- Linder between Chateau and Sandalwood are bookend by two roundabouts and this is where you are going to start seeing some property impacts. It was our hope with this three lanes with a shared use road that we were not going to have property impacts. However, after our last conversation we did some analysis a little bit more and that's when we started to realize that we are definitely going to have a few property impacts, primarily because of those roundabouts. This is also where you saw us try to get a little innovative in our approach to be able to preserve those homes. This is where you are going to see the suggested shared use road. The shared use road does provide access to those homes along that corridor through their own designated space. To give you an idea of what that looks like, again, those are the three homes that we are likely to have to purchase if this is the alternative that moves forward and we have had that conversation with them that says, unfortunately, any alternative and we are going to have to purchase your home and so that was a conversation we just recently had. As difficult as that is they are -- they are not going to see any surprises coming out of this. This is what that -- again that typical section looks like. Something to note -- and based off of the comments that I actually received from this committee and from Council Woman Strader was the concern about that mixed space between pedestrians and vehicles on that shared use road. Something to note about that shared use road, it really is to only provide for access for vehicles who are trying to get to their homes. However, originally we were -- the goal was to be able to create a space that's comfortable enough for everyone to mix in that space, because it's so little utilization. We went back to the driving table and said can we squeeze in a sidewalk in that location? And so you are seeing that suggestion here. It's the best we can do just based off available space. Anything more than this and we would be -- we would actually have to be purchasing homes and so moving along to the corridor, we are going to get further closer to Tully Park to bring your attention to some other type of pedestrian enhancements. Certainly they are getting to your Meridian parkway and this is where we also start to see that mixed space with the open irrigation district -- Irrigation canal that's at that location. There is options we can do at that particular location. This is one suggested option, which is to move that multi-use pathway behind it, but still continuum on to Ustick and continued. Other options you are going to see them in some of the other alternatives coming before you was to actually tile that. So, again, moving on to concept number two. So, there were three concepts. This is the second one. This is your standard five lanes. This is what you typically see right now that is north of Ustick and this is what you see that is at Pine -- Linder and Pine. This is also the largest footprint. So, should this one move forward it is going to be the largest number of homes in which we have to purchase. So, again, I don't -- I don't want to spend too much time walking through some of the amenities I highlighted, because the amenities actually stay the same through all of these alternatives, with a few exceptions. We are going to start with that exception right there. Because we are making a Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 30 of 47 suggestion of expanding the roadway itself and that multi-use pathway connectivity, you are going to see the first series of homes that we are going to have to purchase. All the yellow boxes represent a home we are going to have to purchase should this alternative be the one that moves forward. At this location, rather than shifting everybody across the street, we are keeping the multi-use pathway through the whole corridor across Cherry Lane and hence we are purchasing some additional homes. In addition to that, this is where we start to get back to that pinch point at Chateau and Sandalwood. This is a standard five lane option. This does not have the roundabouts. Now, the roundabouts in both of these alternatives can be shifted. So, if we want a standard five lanes with a roundabout, it's certainly something we can consider. We could keep it just with a shared use road, but just -- just to note. This is also where you are going to see the largest number of property purchases that we are going to have to do and I will tell you I have met -- I like to say with 65 percent of the property owners along this corridor who are being impacted -- 65 is a pretty good number. I can't force everybody to the table if they don't respond, but I will tell you we have engaged with them and the -- it's mixed feelings. When we originally had the conversation the east side was eager. It's the west side we were trying to preserve and I have since had that difficult conversation. I will hold that discussion when we get to the next slide, because that's something to note had to change. We made some changes. So, this is the pinch point along the corridor. This is going to require us to purchase all of the homes which you have highlighted there. There could potentially be some additional homes if a roundabout option is considered. Again this is what that typical section looks like. The footprint is approximately 89 feet, so it's fairly large. Continuing. Oops. It went too fast. Continuing on to Tully Park, rather than the multi-use pathway being back behind the canal at this point, because of the expansion of the road is so large, we are going to have to look to covering up that canal and so the multi-use pathway being adjacent to the road is a suggested option at this location. And, then, continuing along the five lanes with the shared use road, this is -- the shared use road, again, just to note, only between Sandalwood Drive and West Chateau Drive. That's the pinch point. This is one of those options where we were trying to be a little innovative in our approach to be able to preserve as many of the homes as we possibly could. Just to kind of give you some general idea. Because we were purchasing all the homes on the east side it gave us a little bit more space and so to that point we were able to provide adequate sidewalks space, as well as -- as well as that shared use road. You have the landscape buffers on both sides and the landscape median down the middle and, then, the travel lanes. Because we are purchasing the homes on the east side, the multi-use pathway is an appropriate facility at that location. So, just to walk you along. Again, the same amenities still apply. We have the pedestrian hybrid beacon. This option, the shared use road, the five lanes just continues what you have already in existence on Ustick. Sorry. At Ustick as well as Pine. Continuing along the corridor, again, I'm just going to highlight. Those yellow boxes represent a purchase. When we got to this pinch point originally we came in hoping that we were going to be able to preserve all the homes on the west side. However, once we did some additional layout and we were trying to accommodate that multi-use pathway, it became evident that there were going to be a few homes that we would actually have to purchase on the west side and so to give you a general idea of what that looks like, I will bring this in a little bit closer, so you can get Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 31 of 47 a view. Those four homes closer to Sandalwood, those were -- originally we didn't think we are going to have to purchase them. However, we are going to have to purchase them and so it does reduce the number of homes in which we are able to preserve. We have had some really difficult conversations with many of these property owners. If the standard five lane option is the one that moves forward, there are many people who are going to be impacted and so I will tell you that in those conversations a lot of people are starting to understand the circumstances that are in front of them and I highlight that, because I want to highlight what the public had to say and to bring you to that, again, the multi-use pathway option here is behind the canal, as opposed to fronting there on Linder, and, then, we bring you to the Engagement piece. So, when we took this out we had more than 500 people respond, 2.8 thousand folks who visited the site to understand a little bit more about the project, with over 448 folks who actually participated in the survey. In addition to the 61 property owner meetings that we had. Of those we asked them what do you think of these projects? What do you think of the alternatives that were before you? And you are going to see that the three lane design with the shared use road was the least liked amongst all of them. Certainly we understand that with the growth that is taking place in Meridian it's clear that your constituents want to see a five lane. Now, which five lane that is to question. So, we went and we asked them of the standard five lanes, 60.5 either loved it or liked it. Just of that and we just asked them what do you think of this? And, then, of the five lanes designs with the shared use road 40 percent loved it or liked it. When we asked them overall what is your preference, 45.6 percent of preference was concept two, which is the standard five lanes. Concept number three, 28.3 percent, that's the one with the shared use road. And, then, of course, the least liked amongst all of them, of course, was the three lanes. I want to bring you into the next steps is the cost. So, we did a cost comparison on each one of these projects and, obviously, the three lanes is going to be the least cost and, then, you get into the five lanes and, then, you get in those five lanes with the shared use road and you are going to see that number approaching approximately 31 million dollars for the standard five lanes and, then, for the standard five lanes with a shared use road approximately 30 -- 30 million dollars. We -- however, what's not reflected in here and we are doing that analysis is relocation cost. Since we have gone back and realized we are going to likely have to be purchasing more homes, we are going to have to add about 223,000 dollars per home we purchase and that's part of the relocation package, in addition to all the other compensation that comes with it. I do want to take a moment to talk about what conversations did occur with the property owners, so you have an understanding of what's been communicated. When we communicated to all the property owners we talked about worst case scenario. If we have to purchase your home this is what it would look like. We had a right-of-way agent in on every single one of those calls and we talked about how this timeline would play out and how it would impact their family. The compensation package -- and for your understanding it's probably helpful -- the compensation package -- we look to their appraisal or we look for the market, whichever one is higher, that is what we pay. In addition to that, we look to the moving costs per room. So, they also get that additional chunk. In addition to that, say for instance they did their -- refinance their two percent, but, you know, it's raised to seven percent, we pay the difference of that for the duration left of their loan. I bring that up because -- I bring that to your attention so you have an Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 32 of 47 understanding when those property owners or your constituents reach out to you, we did walk them through what that looks like and, then, we walked them through about the timeline, because every single one of these property owners is in a different timeline in their life and so we talked about how long is this going to take. I will tell you three of the ladies I spoke with with their families are in their 90s and certainly, you know, they would like to stay there and so we took that into consideration we talked about how much longer it's going to take before this project actually goes into construction. Others were so eager, buy my house, I don't want to live on Linder, I can't back out. So, I just want to put some -- a glimmer -- you know, some sort of -- tell you what that conversation was. What we are having in those one-on-one meetings, because these are people's homes, but I will tell you I don't think too many of them will be surprised with the outcome of this decision or the decision of ACHD Commission is going to be and so I hope that helps you in understanding what path to take. Lastly, just to kind of give you an idea, somewhat -- we did take into account a lot of conversations through this process with your team and with the representatives from the City of Meridian and some of the concerns that were brought to our attention that we want to make sure that we address in design is should we have to purchase all of these homes, what are we going to do with that vacant space? It's important for your community that we take that into account and so I commit to you that through the design phase of this project our staff will work in concert with your staff to ensure that we address the access management with the remnant parcels. We take into account any concerns regarding restrictions and mitigate any issues with those parcels. It is your community. You certainly don't want to look at dirt space along Linder and so we commit to you being able to work through that process in the design phase. Other things that were brought to our attention that we would like to do to enhance this is raised crossings at Sandalwood, consider that, and review, if we could do that, at the roundabout should a roundabout -- the option move forward, that we really lift those kids up into the view shed of those larger vehicles that are traversing through our neighborhoods now and, lastly, to address some stormwater facilities. But ACHD is committed to continuing to work with your staff through this design phase to take into consideration a lot of those concerns about what happens if we purchase that space, those parcels, and what's going to happen with that space afterwards and, lastly, the next steps. So, this is where we are at. So, we have presented to your transportation committee. We are here before you today. We are asking that the City of Meridian and you consider what option you would like to move forward or asking for a formal letter or formal response, so we can take that back to the ACHD Commission and, again, we are looking and anticipating an adoption at the end of the summer or early fall and that concludes my presentation and I will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Brooke. Council, questions? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 33 of 47 Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, Brooke, thank you so much. That was a great presentation. Excuse me. Is there any capacity difference? I know there would be for the three and the five, but the five on the two different styles, because as we look for putting input into what will be transportation 30, 40 years down the road, as you well know, capacity plays a critical role. Green: Mayor and Council Woman Little Roberts, the capacity stays the same. It is five lanes. The changes of how fast it takes for you to get down the corridor that's going to play a factor if we look to roundabouts as opposed to a signal and I certainly can bring my person with HDR to talk kind of what we anticipate. It's going to be seconds if -- you know, if a roundabout as opposed to an intersection, but the capacity will stay the same, because it's five lanes. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Not to try to put you on the spot, Brooke, but just yesterday I was handed the draft to the FY-25 to '31 regional TIP and in that it put a 5,772,000 dollar figure in for this entire project. Like I said, the look on your face tells me that this was brand new information for me. It was just handed yesterday from COMPASS. If you are not aware of it I'm assuming, looking at this as we are talking about, that would be the initial design, funding and starting with -- no? We have a -- we have a shake. Green: All right. Simison: From a friend. Green: And she would be familiar with what was put in there. Inselman: Yes. Green: So, yes. Inselman: Thank you. For the record, Kristy Inselman. I'm the planning supervisor at ACHD. So, Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, so what was put in the TIP -- they can only use the costs as what we had them, which was in the CIP. So, CIP was our 20 year horizon and that was anticipating a three lane roadway based on cost from like 2020. So, until an actual concept is adopted, then, we won't be able to update the cost in the TIP until we have a formal path forward on what we are going to be doing. I hope that makes sense. Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: It's best to look at that as kind of a placeholder until we decide which direction we are taking. Thank you. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 34 of 47 Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Brooke, thanks for the presentation. Quick question. When thinking about this project and the Linder overpass, can you speak to how the overpass and riders -- or, you know, the number of cars, how that was factored into some of the thinking here? Just kind of -- if you can touch on that point I would appreciate that. Green: Mayor and Councilman Taylor, I'm going to pull up Pearson to go ahead. He is the one that conducted the modeling on the corridor itself. Certainly the overpass plays a factor into this. I will let him speak any further details about what's on the horizon. Whitney: For the record Pearson Whitney. HDR. Mayor Simison, Member Taylor. So, we got the COMPASS long range model and we used that to analyze the traffic associated with the proposed improvements and what we learned from that is that the development of the overpass doesn't really affect the fact that the capacity on the roadway will work in either a three or five lane configuration, because there are so many other north-south routes and when you look at it from a larger origin and destination perspective, either alternative will work and it won't really factor in substantially, because there is other ways to get to the overpass. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Just on the -- the -- I think option three with the trees down the middle, who maintains all of that and how does that work? Green: Mayor and Councilman Whitlock -- and I'm glad I can say that. Congratulations. This is an agreement we would have with the City of Meridian pertaining to the maintenance of those facilities, similar to what we already have in place when we look to do landscaping. It is in concert with the City of Meridian for the maintenance moving forward. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks for the thoroughness of the presentation to us and the efforts you have made to our citizens. Your -- your point about our residents being in all different places in their life, were there some emerging themes or reoccurring themes that came from the public engagement that you tried to take into account? Are there -- were there big themes? Is it start this two years from now? Start this now. I mean you -- you touched on it. Certainly if I'm 90 I don't -- you are not -- I don't want you to take me out of my home. If there is a new opportunity, right, I would hate to be one backing into Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 35 of 47 Linder. I don't wish that on anybody. But were there -- were there any themes or reoccurring comments that you heard and is there a plan to take any of that feedback into account with -- which -- whatever option you move forth with? Green: Mayor and Councilman Cavener, yes, there were a lot of themes. I will tell you initially -- certainly where you are in your life makes these decisions and this impact a little -- little different. Cavener: Yeah. Green: For a lot of folks they were eager to -- once we got to the third meeting, because I have met with them three times -- most of them three times. Once we got to the third meeting I think they had a lot of time to digest what was coming. For those who were older who would like to live out in their homes, I, too, would like to see them live out in their homes. Those were some incredibly emotional meetings and when we look to the costs associated with this project certainly that's going to be a factor played into this. I'm only here to put the facts forward. As for planning and moving it forward, look to our Commission for that direction. I can certainly look to the City of Meridian for that direction, too. But the themes really determine where you are in your life and I will tell you of the 60 -- so, 65 percent is approximately how many people I have met with, there were three older women, all in their 90s. For them certainly I want to see them live out the rest of their lives in their homes and would like to see that move forward. At 30 million dollars for a project I don't anticipate the dates we have listed in the integrated five year work plan are going to -- to stay. So, play that into the decision. But my hope is that they will be able to continue to stay in their homes and -- but I know that their families were with them in these meetings. A lot of them were providing support. But for everyone else -- some people would rather not. They would like to stay in their homes until we actually have to purchase them. Some of them are please buy us out early so I can move on with my life. You know, one -- one particular woman -- insurance company wants her to change the roof of her house and she is like why go put in a 30 year roof when I'm going to have the house torn down? So, these -- that's decisions people are having to weigh and, then, we show up at their doorstep and we have these conversations. But because we did such a -- a phased approach in these conversations I'm hoping that there aren't too many surprises. There will be one or two surprises, but I'm hoping we eased this process a little bit more for them and we don't typically do this in a concept, but I think it was important for this project. Cavener: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just for some feedback, I'm still mulling it over, but it definitely doesn't seem like three lanes is adequate, you know, to meet our needs and I agree with you that I think what Meridian residents expect generally would be the five lane. So, it's really just Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 36 of 47 a question -- in my mind I have eliminated sort of option one and I think it's just the next two concepts that sort of -- I guess are -- are there. So, we have -- the differences I guess are the roundabout versus regular streetlights; right? Whether or not there is a shared access road that I guess would preserve some homes along the corridor and, then, the pathway location. Is there anything else noting -- worth noting? Green: Mayor and Council Woman Strader, no, you have -- you have highlighted the three changes -- or the three options of the two five lanes. You can do a roundabout in either case. We just reflected on one. You can do the intersection in either case. And, then, the multi-use pathway in concert in conversations with the irrigation district, that's one that through design we can work through what the preferences are. Mind you when we go through design we will have some additional public engagement that talk about more nuanced pieces of this project. Right now it's a very high level just to figure out what option. And to your point the citizens did weigh in. It looks to be one of the five lane options is the preferred. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Just one quick question, Brooke. The shared lanes or the shared roads are those one way? Really narrow? They are one way? So, kind of come in, come out, just like to better understand what that looks like. Green: Absolutely. Mayor and Councilman Taylor, yeah, you weren't here for the first discussion and so I take some time really quick to kind of go over what that looks like. I will reflect it there on the five lanes with the shared use road. You see the typical right there. So, it is one way. And I don't know if you can see my cursor. Does my cursor show up? Okay. It doesn't. So, I'm going to speak to it. So, if you lived on the west side and you were getting to one of those homes that we were able to preserve with this option and you wanted to go south, so you will actually come out of your driveway -- I'm sorry. If you wanted to go north. You will come out of your driveway, it's one way south, so you are going to continue along, you will come out -- you will go through the roundabouts and you will flip around and, then, you can go up north and so that is -- the shared use roads are one way for good reason. We don't have enough space to give it to go two directions. With the roundabouts, however, we are able to facilitate that movement. The shared use road could not be necessary -- it would be difficult with an intersection, because we are not going to give -- you can still do it, but the roundabout is what enables them to make the turns and get into their properties, because you are also going to see -- we are making a suggestion for the landscape median down the middle and that's for access control. We made that determination about the whole corridor to minimize folks who are trying to make left-hand turn movements for the safety of the public. Simison: So, Brooke, a couple unfair questions and go from there. Only based on this -- based on maybe some things I have heard. Do you think there is a willingness from Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 37 of 47 the ACHD Commission to do all three of these or is there one that you think is not really an option from what you have heard or believe? Green: Mayor and Council, so I can't speak on behalf of the ACHD Commission. Certainly it's their prerogative to choose which one. They are very much looking to the City of Meridian for your feedback and preference. I will tell you all three options are on the table. I gave this exact same presentation to them as I'm giving to you this evening and it will certainly be left up to them. I can't gauge and it's not my place to gauge where they stand on this. I'm here to give the facts. But I will tell you they are certainly eager to hear what you have to say. Simison: Okay. Second and third questions -- you know, being Linder Road overpass was like a Herculean effort at ten million from ACHD or 15 million -- at 30 million -- I mean the questions you are asking about people's life decisions -- and I'm going to put a few more words maybe in what I felt like what I have heard over the years is ACHD has avoided making improvements on Locust Grove due to the amount of property impacts and cost associated with. What is the likelihood that this is done in ten years and, you know, all things considered -- financial with the rate we are -- you know, I heard today the cost projections Eagle from Amity to Lake Hazel and, again, are -- are these people going to be the ones that are going to actually going to be making the decisions, because ACHD is going to go buy it now and maybe construct it in 15, 20 years? What -- what -- what would you expect from a time frame to the best of your ability? Green: Mayor and Council, very good question. Certainly the cost of doing business has certainly gone up across the valley and not to mention the cost with many of these projects we are seeing significant rises. For programming itself, you know, it is programmed in the integrated five year work plan to move into design in 2028. The cost does become a factor. The City of Meridian, city of Boise, all of our stakeholders, they do provide their prioritization list and we take that into account when we are prioritizing projects. This price tag is high, but I can't certainly determine what our Commission is going to agree to in programming these projects, because it's ultimately up to them. But we do have this in the integrated five year work plan as of today for the design work to start in 2020 -- 2026 we will grant to -- you know 2024 now. Will that change? That could shift. But this is a priority project which you guys have identified. We are out here doing the concept for that good reason. The Linder overpass is a factor. But really the programming and the prioritization will have to come from the City of Meridian in concert with our ACHD Commission prioritizing this with the new -- with the cost. But all of our projects are coming in with very high price tags and that's -- that's going to be a decision our Commission is going to be left to decide which one moves forward. We -- I will tell you the price tag is for the whole project in entirety. To your point about -- can we go into design, can we start the right-of-way process, it is phased in over several years on all of our projects. So, while we may not see construction right away, we can start the other part -- other parts of this project to keep it moving forward and certainly in alignment with your prioritization that you guys put forward. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 38 of 47 Simison: Thank you. Because just from a -- my two cents for -- I think a normalized -- and I say normalized meaning lights, not roundabouts on this corridor and, you know, my -- my rationale is I -- I have got a roundabout near my house. I have always said there is a time and place for roundabouts irregardless, but in this case that corridor, with the schools that are on it and other things, I -- I just don't feel like roundabouts are great for a lot of bus traffic that will -- that will drive through here, especially if you are only going to have to -- on what is currently being built. I -- I -- I'm not getting the impression that we are going to go back and redo the other intersections on Linder, but just to throw in two roundabouts here in the middle when you remove the housing obstructions, you know, there were -- the -- you want people driving slower if you had the -- the alley -- or the people backing into the roadway, but when you remove that and you get to a more standard road section, at least to me the regular lighted intersections would seem to work better than putting in two random roundabouts along this -- what I think is going to be -- no disrespect to the modeling -- I think this is going to be much heavier -- more heavily used than the modeling predicts long term, because of all the community access points that are along Linder that connect, you know, down from Eagle. You know, I'm not going to say Swan Falls. I have only driven down there once. I'm -- I'm not going that far. But, you know, the amount of people in -- and here in Kuna who are excited about this -- I think the modeling is not going to be accurate long term for what this road is going to be functioning as. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I actually agree with most everything you said and talked about that yesterday. I think that this is going to be a very heavily used road for the very fact that it's going to be a north-south from the farthest edges of Kuna all the way into Eagle. Already has a bridge crossing at the Boise River and I think it -- although we always try to predict what the vehicle trips today are going to be on a roadway, sometimes we are wildly off. When Locust Grove was just an overpass, vehicle trips doubled almost instantly when that thing opened up. So, I don't -- I don't base what I think vehicle trips are going to be based on it being just an overpass not a full on-ramps, off-ramps and I think this Linder Road is going to get a lot of use and I will say right now I'm fully in favor of the five lane concept that keeps it consistent through the whole area. I know it's a huge impact, but I think it's the right thing to do. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Would you pull up the concept to graphic that's similar to this one? Green: Mayor and Council Woman Strader, certainly. Strader: Thanks. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 39 of 47 Green: Is this what you are looking for? Strader: What I wanted to find was concept two. Yeah. Thank you. I think -- I think there are some trade-offs just talking out loud; right? So, I -- I think the Mayor makes a really good point about the pedestrian element with the schools and having, you know, kind of standard intersections compared to a roundabout and I think to me like the trade-offs there are -- it feels like the roundabout concept is pretty critical for the success of the shared use road, because it's going to be really challenging for those homeowners to sort of get in and out without a roundabout. I'm leaning a little bit toward concept two, just because I feel like there is a level of predictability here. We are not, then, kind of innovating this shared use road that we have never really tried before. I have had some concerns, because it -- again, it -- because it's a one way I have had a concern that people will see that as -- during traffic a way to zip through and kind of avoid traffic, which I think is risky for the homes that would be along there. I just -- I feel like concept two provides a level of predictability and sort of meets what I think most people in Meridian consider like our standard and just what they would expect. So, I mean I'm open minded and I'm -- I want to hear everybody's thoughts, but just -- it feels like if we are not -- if we are not even considering roundabouts and that becomes our consensus, then, I feel like we should move away from the shared use road, because the roundabout feels really critical for that to be successful. I don't know. I'm just sharing some thoughts. But that's my initial reaction. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Yes. Thinking back to the previous presentation -- I'm on that bus, too. I -- I think from a safety standpoint and -- and I have -- there are some of those shared roads -- and I don't -- I don't think they are attractive. I don't think they invite a good feeling in your neighborhood. So, I -- I totally agree. I think it would become a thoroughfare for people trying to get around traffic that will naturally build up there. So, I'm on that option two bus. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: This may be a question for you and everyone else. Are we officially weighing in tonight? Are we going to discuss this later and write a letter or is this our opportunity to say what we think? Simison: My understanding is ACHD would like a letter, but my desire is that this was the decision point and we can put it into a letter from tonight's conversation anything that needs to be pointed out specifically. Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 40 of 47 Taylor: Okay. Well, I'm -- I'm going to -- I'm supportive of the concept two as well. I -- actually do -- you made a good point. I -- I agree with that. I think once the Linder overpass is done I think this will be a pretty significant roadway. I think it will be a lot of -- a lot of traffic, especially as the community grows, really only having a few points where we can go north-south in Meridian across the freeway. So, I -- yeah, I think concept two works and I agree with Council Woman Strader's comments, I think this is just what the people expect and what we like and I think familiarity is -- is good. Sometimes we introduce new concepts here and there and I think they -- sometimes they confuse, if anything. So, I -- I -- I am in support of concept two. I think that's the right approach. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I'm in agreement as well. I think there could be a case made if there was such a -- make a significant shift in cost, but they are, you know, similar I guess playbook, so I'm -- I'm supportive of concept two. I think it's the right thing to do. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor and Brooke, I will concur with that. I think looking through everything -- everything has got its pluses and minuses, but I think we can only consider the larger roadways and with that I would concur that concept two would be our best route to go. Simison: Okay. Well, with that you have heard the feedback. We will have a letter transmitted to you no later than -- you know, if -- we will talk and see if we are going to bring something back. It's going to be a pretty simple letter. I'm not going to just -- mean we are not going to go into a lot of deviation, other than saying concept two. But we will get something to you hopefully by early next week. Green: Okay. Thank you, Mayor, Council. It's a privilege to be before you. Appreciate this opportunity to bring this project and to work with your constituents. It has been a fun project, because it's different, and I want to thank you for taking your time tonight to -- to consider it and I will take that back to our Commission and we shall hear this hopefully at the end of the summer, early fall. Simison: And thank you, Brooke. And just -- I know it's a tough job, so thank you for your -- your disposition in dealing with the residents and having those very tough heart wrenching conversations and, you know, at least on a personal level, you know, great, but I think if you can -- from my perspective I think that the homes that need to be purchased sooner should be purchased sooner to help alleviate things that people are either going to try to do or stages of life, you know. So, even if it's phased, even if this is Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 41 of 47 not going to be built for -- constructed for 15 years, the more we can advance that the sooner the better I think for all of us, especially for the residents impacted that want to leave. Green: Yeah. That's what I heard from the residents. So, I will tell you, just to understand the decision tonight, these residents know this is coming and so while they were tough decisions, I hope that helps you in your decision making process, too, to know that we have been communicating to them and have been transparent this whole time. 19. Ada County Highway District Master Street Map Changes — Arterial Corridor Preservation Simison: Thank you, Brooke. Mr. Hood, are we quick? Unless someone needs a break. I think this will be fairly quick, this next item? Hood: Mr. Mayor, I -- I hope to be pretty brief. It's a pretty detailed topic, but I will go as quickly as -- as possible. Simison: I just want to make sure everyone's good and we don't need to take a break or if you planned on being long. So, with that -- Cavener: Agree to the rush. Sorry, Mr. Mayor. Simison: Yeah. Exactly. Cavener: If this was going to be an hour, then, maybe to take a five minute break, but if we are going to be -- Hood: Certainly not an hour from my perspective. Simison: Okay. Hood: Ten, 15 minutes maybe. Simison: All right. Then with that we will move on to Item No. 19, Ada County Highway District master street map changes, arterial corridor preservation. Mr. Hood. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Kind of building -- I was trying to figure out a way to work riding a bus into this presentation, but standards came up just a couple of times in that last presentation, so, really, this is about standards. This is a follow up to the conversation we had with ACHD -- you had with ACHD in January at the joint meeting talking about McMillan primarily, but other arterial roadway section line arterial roadways in Meridian and standardizing that and saying, hey, at least plan for five lanes on all section land arterials. I am asking this evening that -- that we send a letter to ACHD formalizing kind of that informal conversation that we had. They did kind Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 42 of 47 of a back-of-the-napkin estimate of what that, you know, financial impact is, because there are some three lane roadways, as we just pointed out with this segment of Linder previously or even currently they are still planning on that being three lanes, but five lanes is an option. There is a financial impact. But we want ACHD to consider that in their planning moving forward. So, that first document that -- that considers that as the master street map or the Master street plan. So, again, what I'm proposing to you through the Transportation Commission that's talked about this over the last three meetings that they had, was to request ACHD change several segments. So, I'm just going to run through four -- four maps real quick. McMillan corridor, this one's pretty easy. It's the one, two, three, four, five miles of McMillan on the western part of the city and our area of impact. Going to slide two. So, match line basically here. There is seven miles of McMillan that would change. They are only currently planned to be three. Two miles of Meridian Road north of Ustick and two more miles of Locust Grove north of Ustick that, again, are only currently planned for three lanes. We would ask them to make those -- preserve the right of way for up to five lanes in the future. Cherry -- actually there is a -- there is a change. This is the biggest conversation with the Transportation Commission. One of the things that staff asked the Commission to consider and -- and Council -- although I will stand down -- is the viability of Cherry Lane west of Meridian Road being a seven lane roadway in the future. There is some pretty significant impacts and the Transportation Commission wasn't comfortable making that request to go down to five. So, right now ACHD is actually planning for that to be seven and staff said, hey, we would like, again, that standard. Maybe five makes more sense. We are going to do some more evaluation over the coming year with the Transportation Commission, so we can put a pin in that. If you want to comment on it that's fine, but the Transportation Commission said, hey, we are not quite comfortable going there yet. So, the yellow segment, including the -- the piece that's purple, no change to that to what ACHD is planning and that's seven lanes. So, aside from Cherry-Fairview and these few miles that go into Boise is seven lanes -- I'm going to jump real quick to this one. Overland. There is two miles of Overland that are also planned for seven lanes in the future. Everything else is either three or five and with this change, again, back to standards, everything would be five lanes or a hundred feet of right of way, except for those couple of miles -- jump back real quick. Also impacted is Overland west of ten Mile. Two miles. All of the Victory corridor into Boise and one mile of Amity that ties in there in Boise and, then, South Eagle Road. And Columbia I guess. I didn't -- forget that. So, again, in the interest of time -- I can jump into that more. I can explain more about how the -- the master street map functions, works, how it works with our Comprehensive Plan, generally how ACHD uses it, although we have Kristy here, so she could give you more details. But, again, that is the request. I have drafted a letter. I actually shared it with Dave -- Mr. Miles this afternoon. Fairly straightforward. Just lists these and says, hey, we would like ACHD to consider changing the master street map per these four attachments. And, again, with that, Mr. Mayor, I would stand for any questions you or the Council have. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Hood. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 43 of 47 Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe I'm being dense, but just to make sure I understand, so the plan is to ask for the preservation of up to five lanes in these areas, except for where more lanes are planned. Hood: Seven. Uh-huh. Strader: Right. So, we are just sort of carving out -- if you have already planned more lanes we are not planning to shrink them, obviously. Yeah. Okay. I think -- I think it makes great sense personally. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Yeah. But I just want to make sure that I -- I heard you right that when you said staff wanted to take a look at the seven lanes, is that City of Meridian staff, highway district staff? Both? Help fill me in. Hood: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I appreciate the question. A little bit -- so, mostly city staff, although at the Transportation Commission we did have a representative from the West Ada School District who was also supportive of considering -- I don't want to over speak or -- but with the middle school being there, high school not too far away, seven lanes, obviously, is harder to cross for a middle schooler that's maybe trying to go to our library or get home on the north side of -- of Cherry Lane. So, a lot to consider there. You want to move traffic; right? There is projections with motorists, but you also have a livability factor, so -- but, again, back to your original question, mainly city staff that said, you know what, let's -- let's maybe think about this Meridian Road with the interchange, maybe that's where we transition is our downtown from seven and keep five lanes all the way to the west. I don't have a true pros and cons list developed, but it was something that we at least asked to think through a little bit more is a seven lane facility right through the middle of our community makes the most sense. However you define that. Simison: And maybe, Caleb, at least in this case -- I mean you are talking about redevelopment before you would ever go do right of way, otherwise, there is a purchase. So, it's not as if though we are -- it is a little bit of different conversation and develop over time. Hood: And -- and, Mr. Mayor, if I may just to follow up on that a little bit, the master street map mainly is about preservation and there is not a whole lot to preserve there, because there is not a whole lot of development from greenfield development. You will see redevelopment over time, but, again, those impacts are pretty large on the existing properties that are there when you have to buy the additional right of way for ultimately seven lanes. So, there is still community impacts. Yes. Good point, Mayor. That Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 44 of 47 redevelop -- there is preservation. This is a lot about preserving for the future whatever that may hold. Simison: Council, any -- we could -- if so -- I know I got a letter forwarded to me, but haven't looked at it. But I -- again, I assume it will be a pretty simple straightforward letter on this one as well. All right. Thank you very much. Hood: Thank you. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 20. Ordinance No. 24-2054: An ordinance (Reveille Ridge Subdivision — H-2023-0050) annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 59.97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (34.69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: With that Item 20 is our -- is Ordinance No. 24-2054. Ask the Clerk to read this Ordinance by title. Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 24-2054, an ordinance Reveille Ridge Subdivision, H-2023-0050, annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", rezoning 59.97 acres of such real property from the RUT to the R-8, 34.69 acres, Medium-Density Residential, and R-15, 25.28 acres, Medium-High Density Residential zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps, as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody who would like it read in its entirety? If not do I have a motion? Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 45 of 47 Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Move that we approve Ordinance No. 24-2054. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 24-2054. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Simison: Council, we have reached the end of our meeting agenda, but we have also reached the last meeting for Deputy Chief Joe Bongiorno prior to his retirement from the city. Joe, it's been a pleasure having you join me up here for the full five years. I know it goes well beyond that in that context. We have had a lot of good conversations and feedback from you for what you have done just here, but we really appreciate and value everything you have done for your career to the residents of Meridian. So, you got a mic in front of you. If you have any final parting words of wisdom that will be on the record I'm sure we would be happy to take them. Bongiorno: No. Mr. Mayor and Council, thank you so much. It's been a wild ride for sure. My 24 years with the City of Meridian, 21 years full time, three years as a volunteer has been awesome. I'm happy I made it to the end of my career and it's been a blast sitting here with you guys. Thank you so much. Simison: Council, anyone else? Cavener: Yeah. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Take a mic away for me tonight when it comes to this one. Chief, you have taught me a lot and how I look at a land use application today is much different than how I looked at it ten years ago and it's thanks to you. You really bring a public safety approach to all of our work and you have made us as a city better, us as a Council, me as a Council Member better. I will forever use the term speed pillows as long as I exist, but there is something bigger than that and you are just an incredible man and a father and a husband and a leader and on the few occasions we have been able to eat together and connect -- not as a deputy chief and a Council Member, just as two guys Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 46 of 47 who care about this Meridian -- this community of ours, I have just -- I have learned a lot about you and I just continue to admire you both personally and professionally. Know that will continue long after Friday and really want to just wish you well in a new chapter. We appreciate it. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I will try to do this without crying. I already got to hug him outside. I first encountered chief at the Chamber. He came to do an inspection and learned a lot that day about -- and have been learning ever since. It's been a pleasure to get to work with you the first time and, again, the second time and so you will definitely be missed. Just wish you the very best. I know there is a second chapter and just real excited to hear about what that is, so -- Bongiorno: You are going to have to teach me how to golf. Little Roberts: Deal. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. No. I just want to share everyone else's comments and thank you so much, you know, for spending your most precious resource your time with us for so long and building a career here and you have, obviously, made a huge impact on everybody and I wish you well in the next chapter. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I was going to try to take -- go to adjournment, so I don't want you to have to say anything nice about someone from the fire department, but Councilman Overton. Overton: Mr. Mayor, I'm struggling here, but I'm going to get through it. I have spent a career not having to say too many nice things about firemen, but in all jest. You have been a supremely dedicated member of the department and I'm proud to call you chief for all of your years of service to this community. Every night you are here we can tell that you are only interest and your main interest is for the citizens of Meridian, not for yourself, and that's what's most important that you carry with you and be proud of. Appreciate it. Simison: With that anyone want to end the meeting? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session June 18,2024 Page 47 of 47 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: So much fun, but I move we adjourn the meeting. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:57 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 7-9-2024 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7-9-2024 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session June 4,2024 Page 15 of 16 the longer goal of our-- all of us up here of going towards what we think is an appropriate speed limit of 45 miles per hour, but let's let the data showcase that, you know. While you talk about the severity of crashes, every crash is severe to our police department in the time that they have to spend on every accident on that road. Lower speed limits will reduce that. We know that. What can be avoided in ten miles per hour for those that actually follow the speed limit? I don't -- I don't want to guess, but I'm going to say it's going to be one less -- one -- one fewer than it is currently on there and each one of those saves our officer's time, our taxpayers money and resident a lot of heartache and impact that may be life altering, even though it doesn't seem severe on the -- on the numbers, you know. I don't know how severity gets, you know, whiplash for someone's impacted for the rest of their life due to a sore back. Is that severe or not compared to a death, a fatality? It is all severe. So, how we get to the point where we actually articulate the value and the impacts regarding cost severity, taxpayers, et cetera, that's where we want to go and that's why I do want to, you know -- you and 1, we -- we talked last week and appreciate this update a lot more than the update last week in this context that it is a step in the right direction and it's a step where hopefully the data will prove to you about that even though the traffic flow may be different, but the accident reduction will hopefully showcase that, yes, despite the greater travel speed study this has the greater long term and it hits your number one element, which is in your mission statement, which is safe -- safety. Safety before mobility. I don't know if you guys -- that's how you rate them, but it is number one in that context and we will prove that up. So, I appreciate you bringing this forward at this time and hopefully we can get something as you mentioned no later than next spring. You know, if we can move forward faster let's do it. Let's not wait. Don't want anything to -- but I understand you got budgets you may have to work through and time along with other projects. So, appreciate it very much. All right. Look forward to working with you. Okay. Council, we have reached the end of our agenda. Do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move to adjourn. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5.25 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-18-2024 Meridian City Council Work Session June 4,2024 Page 16 of 16 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-18-2024 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 4, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council June 4,2024 Page 34 of 35 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Tonight I think a -- a good opportunity was raised for maybe a future meeting topic about planned parks, vision parks, how they sit on the map. So, maybe as either part of a department update down the road, but I think it may be worthy of a good conversation just for us to understand kind of the historical nature of it, where the Parks Department is growing and how we can make sure that maybe the -- in situations like this where -- where dirt starts to go away, what the department does to respond in kind. Simison: Okay. Steve, you have got that on your future -- come to a workshop. Council, with that do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7.56 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-18-2024 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-18-2024 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 11, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council June 11,2024 Page 8 of 8 Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:12 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-18-2024 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-18-2024 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Foxcroft Water Easement Full Release (ESMT-2024-0076) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-032997 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 MATT BUNK 06/20/2024 08:37 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: Water Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: Viper Investments LLC INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated May 10 , 2023 and recorded as Instrument Number 2023-026772 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS,the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish,release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 18th day of June 20 24 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simiso M or 6-18-2024 � ! SEAL Attest by C 's Johns' ""y Clerk 6-18-2024 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-18-2024 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. stain Na&Y W ( p) Notary Signature CHARLENE WAY My Commission Expires: COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Emergency Access Easement Number 1 (ESMT- 2024-0079) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-033000 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 MATT BUNK 06/20/2024 08:38 AM Project Name,Subdivision Name,or Building Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Emergency Access Easement Number: Identify this Fasement by sequential number if the project contains❑rare than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. l'or Intemal use Only ESMT-2024-0079 Record Number: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 18th day of --- June 20 24 between C4 Land LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian is requiring an access area for emergency vehicles as a condition of development approval; and WHEREAS, Grantor desires to grant an easement for ingress and egress across those certain parts of Grantor's property defined herein to allow for emergency vehicle access; and WHEREAS,Grantor shall construct certain improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE CASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing anon-exclusive easement and right-of-way on, over,across and through Grantor's property with the free right of access to such property at any and all times and for the purpose of allowing egress and ingress to and from the property for emergency vehicle access. Pursuant to the International hire Code, this access road shall be constructed of an improved surface capable of supporting 82,000 GV W; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that no structures shall be constructed,erected, or placed upon the surface of the easement area that would materially impair the normal operation or use ofthe easement area for emergency vehicular purposes. The term "structures" includes, but is not limited to, buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees,and shrubs. THE GRANTOR further covenants and agrees there shall be no parking of vehicles within the easement area. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the patties hereto,that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the access roadway improvements. EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT Page 1 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part ofthe easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries ofany public street, then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof,shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed ofthe aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR STATE OF IDAHO ) )ss County ofAda ) This 1•ecord was acknowledged before me on q �(date) by A ` - _,on behalfof in the following re resentative c pacity:_M (type ofauthority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below o•'��t►tE LA�V�'•. '',•� ••'•N•��••••••�.•i•, Notary gignature G;lypTARy'•. My Commission Expires: �"'�'1s -?n�fp SnpUBL C" EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT Page 2 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk 6-18-2024 STATE OF IDAHO, } ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-18-2024(date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalfofthe City ofMeridian,in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Slump Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT Page 3 01/01/2024 A, kk Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC EXHIBIT A 5jY=r- / P: (208) 398-8104 F: (208) 398-8105 r 5vro n''/IG 2030 5. Wa5hington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 Sanitary Sewer and Emergency Access Legal Description BASIS OF BEARINGS is N. 0131'28" E. between a found brass cap LS 737, marking the southwest corner of Section 25 and a found aluminum cap PLS 13934 marking the 1/4 corner common to Sections 25 and 26, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. An easement located in the S1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Kuna, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a brass cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 25; Thence S. 89032'33" E., coincident with the south line of said SW1/4, a distance of 300.06 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5617; Thence N. 0031'14" E., 337.26 feet; Thence S. 8912832" E., 114.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N. 0031'28" E., 119.34 feet; Thence N. 75051'42"W., 74.34 feet; Thence N. 89112832"W., 243.73 feet; Thence S. 0131'28"W., 35.00 feet; Thence N. 89028'32"W., 20.00 feet; Thence N. 0031'28" E., 35.00 feet; Thence N. 89028'32"W., 29.02 feet; Thence N. 0031'28" E., 20.00 feet; Thence S. 8912832" E., 295.13 feet; D Thence S. 75151'42" E., 101.72 feet; o `: 115 7 Thence S. 0131'28"W., 132.90 feet; °- CD Thence N. 8902832"W., 29.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, A- 0 ✓F� -�y Said easement contains 0.275 more or less. r DtAO\ P:\2023\1 EMT\123048-WINDROW SUB-CONGER\Survey\Drawings\Legal Descriptions\Sanitary Sewer and Emergency Access Ease.docx Page 11 L� EXHIBIT B BASIS OF BEARING S. LINDER RD N 00°31'28"E 2652.48' x �� �tg G �N 20.00' N 00031'28"E f I fV I I A f I 35.00' of i �n3z a I PROt ( � 3 C) n I o y n can -C r I I cn O ZE do l•� I i I ti I I - I ' rn I 0 o i wI iw I - m I I A c I O ? w f I I I v G p N 00031114"E 33Z26' � T o j yo I �o I w f v �l I ry n Z � � r v �tv �, ^1 � � I o 119.34' - m to ---------------------1 O� 3 ru o I - W,Z o L---S 00°31'28'"W 132.90'--- n w N 2 °p'COO o�o� n oornz za. , �j O ��V< C� i � 6 V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024-0082) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-033003 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 MATT BUNK 06/20/2024 08:40 AM Project Name or Subdivision Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Windrow Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number.- Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructionstchecklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only E Record Number: SMT-2024-0082 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 18thday of June 20 24 between C4 Land LAC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS,the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and W14IEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,and other good and valuable consideration,the Grantor does hereby give,grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of- way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and allied facilities,together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right ofaccess to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance,Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed therein violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports,sheds,fences,trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. Sanitary Sewer Easement Page € Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: V V STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County ofAda ) yy This record was acknowledged before me on ° date) by— (name of individual), [complete the following,q signing in a representa ca- • ity, o'r,�s ke the following if signing in an individual capacio,1 on behalf of ON ? — (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: _ (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below — — •��•• Notary Signature ,,�.�"4P ••••�••••��`�!•, My Commission Expires: -3-aaa� �'�O'1CAR Y�'• i 100'UBL1C�i Sanitary Sewer Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 �j GRANTEE; CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-18-2024 STATE OF IDAHO, } ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-18-2024 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires; 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 EXHIBIT A Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC P: (208) 398-8104 F: (208) 398-8105 2030 5. Wa5hington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 Sanitary Sewer and Emergency Access Legal Description BASIS OF BEARINGS is N. 0°31'28" E. between a found brass cap LS 737, marking the southwest corner of Section 25 and a found aluminum cap PLS 13934 marking the 1/4 corner common to Sections 25 and 26, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. An easement located in the S1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Kuna, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a brass cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 25; Thence S. 89032'33" E., coincident with the south line of said SW1/4, a distance of 300.06 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5617; Thence N. 0131'14" E., 337.26 feet; Thence S. 8912832" E., 114.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N. 0131'28" E., 119.34 feet; Thence N. 75051'42"W., 74.34 feet; Thence N. 8912832"W., 243.73 feet; Thence S. 0031'28"W., 35.00 feet; Thence N. 8902832"W., 20.00 feet; Thence N. 0131'28" E., 35.00 feet; Thence N. 8912832"W., 29.02 feet; Thence N. 0031'28" E., 20.00 feet; Thence S. 8902832" E., 295.13 feet; Thence S. 75051'42" E., 101.72 feet; 0 o � Q:Thence S. 0031'28"W., 132.90 feet; °- 1 d 157 � Thence N. 89028'32"W., 29.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. / OF ID Said easement contains 0.275 more or less. OEAG P:\2023\1 EMT\123048-WINDROW SUB-CONGER\Survey\Drawings\Legal Descriptions\Sanitary Sewer and Emergency Access Ease.docx Page 11 L O EXHIBIT B BASIS OF BEARING S. -CINDER RD N 00°31'28"E 2652.48' W N v I 20.00' N 00"31'28"E i II I of I I NI I 35.00` of rn IPRO ` i I rr o I I ►w I N'` I 34� 2' r o Z Z N co -i n o n� o �O N I < rn o V r • - Oo I rn ko Ni � m I ZE m I O p I I I Z � w I I rn I o N 00031'14"E 337.26` o o n w Ln14 tim I I'd co O i c b� Cl oo 119.34 i I � -, rn cn ko ------------ -----� p .. � NJto 00 Nj -! i ti'----------------------- �' O o` z I S 00031`28"W 132.90' g w -i o0 co O n z g 00 co < Y � crn� �� oz ti rn N w � i 14 o N„ O ra W r�`.i O I I E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Pebblebrook Subdivision (H-2024- 0005) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 5725 N. Meridian Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-, AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 13.94-acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 54 Building Lots and Six(6) Common lots on 13.94-acres of Land for Pebblebrook Subdivision,by Rodney Evans+Partners,LLC. Case No(s). H-2024-0005 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 4,2024 (Findings on June 18, 2024) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4, 2024, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PEBBLEBROOK SUBDIVISION AZ PP H-2024-0005 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation&zoning and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PEBBLEBROOK SUBDIVISION AZ PP H-2024-0005 -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 4,2024 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PEBBLEBROOK SUBDIVISION AZ PP H-2024-0005 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 18th day of June 2024. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-18-2024 Attest: Chris Johnson 6-18-2024 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. 6-18-2024 By: Dated: City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PEBBLEBROOK SUBDIVISION AZ PP H-2024-0005 -4- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E IDAN�-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I DIA H Q HEARING June 4,2024 Legend DATE: lei PFalect Lacs fiar. TO: Mayor&City Council b FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: Pebblebrook Subdivision—AZ,PPEEO H-2024-0005 LOCATION: 5725 N. Meridian Rd.,in the NE 1/4 of � Section 25,TAN., R.1W. (Parcels #SO425142030& SO425141990) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of 13.94-acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and Preliminary Plat consisting of 54 building lots and 6 common lots on 13.94-acres of land. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Acreage 13.94-acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)with a Park designation Existing Land Use Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Uses Single-family detached dwellings Current Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT)in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 54 building/6 common Phasing plan(#of phases) 1 Number of Residential Units(type 54 single-family detached units of units) Density(gross&net) 3.87 units/acre(gross) Open Space(acres,total [%]/ 98,188 s.f. (or 2.25-acres—16.16%)(see analysis in Section VI for more buffer/qualified) information) Amenities (2)pickleball courts,(2)pet waste stations Physical Features(waterways, The Knight Lateral and associated easement crosses this site. hazards,flood plain,hillside) Pagel Neighborhood meeting date 2/l/24 History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) • TIS(yes/no) No(not required) • Existing Conditions There are(2)existing driveways via N.Meridian Rd. • CIP/IFYWP Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)t Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Meridian Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 3-lanes from McMillan Road to US 20126 with the design years in 2027-2028 and the construction date has not been determined. Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Access is proposed via the extension of existing local stub streets IN. H /Local)(Existin and Proposed) Garbo Ave. at the north and south boundaries of the site. Traffic Level of Service Meridian Rd.—Better than"B"(acceptable) Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross A stub street is proposed to the abutting County parcel at the northeast corner Access of the site. Existing Road Network N.Meridian Rd.,an arterial street,exists along the east boundary of the site. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/Buffers There are no existing sidewalks or buffers on this site. Proposed Road Improvements None Proposed Road Improvements Meridian Rd.is required to be improved with 17' of pavement from centerline with a 3' gravel shoulder and 10'wide detached sidewalk. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 1.4 miles(Station#5) • Fire Response Time Meets standards • Resource Reliability 81%(meets goal) • Risk Identification 2(current resources are adequate) • Accessibility Meets access requirements • Special/resource needs Requires an aerial device(can meet this requirement) • Water Supply 11111kMM 1,000 gallons/minute for one hour(less if building is sprinklered) • Other Resources Police Service No comments received West Ada School District No comments received Distance(elem,ins,hs) Capacity of Schools #of Students Enrolled Wastewater _ • Distance to Sewer Services Available at site • Sewer Shed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See application • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan Page 2 • Impacts/Concerns • Flows committed • See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section IX.B. Water • Distance to Services Available at site • Pressure Zone 2 • Estimated Project Water ERU's See application • Water Quality Concerns None • Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section IX.B. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend � Legend 0Praject Lccaiion Projeci Laca-flon 6 BEE I�hIJ- LLTM1�1lr°AIU RCS J��p a•r.�s. ` l sld�al di M[EHig ensih id i Jl x Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend Legend Project Lccaiion Project Lucai�on City Lin- A U R1 e R - — Planned Parcels -C C C- RUT --- -- e M R-In o R - Page 3 III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Benjamin Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners,LLC— 1450 W. Bannock St.,Boise,ID 83702 B. Owner: Eric Scheck, TeAmo Despacio, LLC— 1020 N. Hickory Ave., Ste. 200,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 4/2/2024 5/19/2024 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 3/29/2024 5/17/2024 Public hearing notice sign posted 4/5/2024 5/24/2024 on site Nextdoor posting 3/29/2024 5/17/2024 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS LAND USE: This property is designated as Medium Density Residential(MDR) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. A future park is also designated on the FLUM on this property in this general area. The purpose of this designation is to preserve and protect existing and future public neighborhood, community,regional, and urban parks. The Parks Department has determined it's not feasible for a park to develop on this site. The subject property is part of a slightly larger enclave surrounded by single-family residential properties on land also designated MDR on the FLUM. The Applicant proposes to develop 54 single-family residential detached homes on the property at a gross density of 3.87 units per acre,which is at the low end of the density range desired in the MDR designation but is generally consistent with the density of surrounding developments. TRANSPORTATION: The Master Street Map(MSM)does not depict any collector streets across this property. The MSM designates Meridian Rd. as a residential arterial with 3-lanes within 78' of right-of-way. ACHD is requiring Meridian Rd. to be improved with 17' of pavement from centerline, a 3' wide gravel shoulder and a 10' wide detached sidewalk abutting the site as shown on the plat and landscape plan in Section VIII. Transit is not available to this site. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) Only one (1) housing type, single-family detached dwellings is proposed, which will contribute to the variety in housing types in the general vicinity. Page 4 • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices."(3.07.01A) The proposed site design generally provides a good transition in density and lot sizes to abutting lots at PI and 2:1 ratios; however, there are a couple of areas (Lots 7-9, Block 2 abutting Lot 10, Block 49 in Paramount#21 and Lots 10-12, Block 2 abutting two lots in Bordeaux Estates to the south)where 3 lots abut 1 lot. The lots in these areas should be revised(or lots removed) to reflect a maximum 2:1 ratio. FYI` EE LW f LW • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land."(3.07.00) The proposed and existing adjacent uses are all single-family detached homes of similar sizes and lot sizes, which should reduce conflicts and maximizing use of land. • "Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development." (2.02.02C) Development of the subject property, which is part of a slightly larger enclave area, should not negatively impact abutting existing development as like uses and a good transition in lot sizes is proposed with the exception noted above. (This development is not downtown) • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems with development of the subdivision;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity."(2.02.01D) There are no pedestrian pathways stubbing to this property from adjacent developments other than sidewalks along existing stub streets to this property. These sidewalks will be extended with development for pedestrian connectivity between developments. Page 5 • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks are required to be provided with development of the subdivision. • "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity."(6.01.02B) There are currently two (2)access points on N. Meridian Rd.for this property. With development, both of these accesses will be closed and access will be provided via local streets within the development. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) Development of most of the infill area in this location will contribute to maximizing public services. In summary, Staff finds the proposed development is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan per the above analysis. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION(AZ) The Applicant proposes to annex 13.94-acres of land with an R-8 zoning district for the development of 54 single-family homes at a gross density of 3.87 units per acre,which is consistent with the MDR FLUM designation as discussed above in Section V. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.A. This property is an infill property within the City's Area of City Impact boundary. A preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is proposed to be subdivided and developed(see Section VIII). Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Future development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the subject property develops as proposed, Staff recommends a DA is required with the provisions discussed herein and included in Section IX.A. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP): The proposed preliminary plat consists of 54 building lots and 6 common lots on 13.94-acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district as shown in Section VIII.B. Proposed lots range in size from 5,420 square feet(s.f.)to 15,482 s.f.,which will accommodate the variety of dwelling sizes proposed ranging from 1,574 to 3,195 s.f. The subdivision is proposed to develop in one (1)phase. The Applicant has been in discussions with the adjacent Paramount Subdivision Homeowner's Association (HOA) to include the proposed development in their HOA and be subject to their CC&R's and development guidelines to enrich property values and cohesiveness with surrounding homes. HOA dues would apply to the maintenance and operation of the existing common areas and amenities in Paramount Subdivision, which would allow residents of this development to use those amenities and common areas. Likewise, Paramount residents would also have access to use Pebblebrook's common Page 6 areas and amenities. A final agreement of these terms has not yet been reached as discussions are on- going, the HOA wants to see if the project is approved by the City before officially making a decision. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are two(2)existing single-family homes and associated outbuildings on the property that are proposed to be removed. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat,all existing structures shall be removed from the property. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table I1-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. The proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards of the district. Road Improvements: ACHD is requiring Meridian Rd.to be improved with 17' of pavement from centerline with a 3' gravel shoulder and 10'wide detached sidewalk;only 6' of pavement and a 3'wide shoulder is required at this time—curb and gutter will be added later when Meridian Rd. is fully expanded(see Detail 2 on Sheet PP.1 below). Access: Access is proposed via the extension of existing local streets(N. Garbo Ave.) at standard street sections at the north and south boundary of the property; local public streets are proposed for internal access.No access is proposed or allowed via N. Meridian Rd.A stub street is proposed to the County parcel at the northeast corner of the property for future extension. Bulb-outs are provided along Gleason Street as traffic-calming in response to ACHD's comments requiring Gleason Street to be redesigned to reduce the length or include passive design elements. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Meridian Rd.,an entryway corridor,measured from the ultimate back of curb. A 47.5' wide buffer is proposed as shown on Detail 2 on Sheet PP.1 of the plat, as follows: 47.5Y LAW SOME BUFFER MEASURED FRDM EUILD4 W TBC 27WOMMONLOr � dOWRALF'MOTHROW � as,on 23,W BUILD OUT TBC TO CAL z,aa ,Bar ON' 77.W PAVEMENT ' r 4W 311Y Ear EXISTIW J PAVEMEFrr=9 COWRETESIDEWALN PER DRJdfadP WINDOW J --- AIdiQST'B,dhC S6709 ,,F=�1 AN FOR MATIONS FUTURE BUILD-OUT CUMe Lpr,ATM N. Meridian Rd. Widening 2 PP-1 Landscaping is required to be provided within the buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-7C.3,including the standards for entryway corridors. The proposed buffer incorporates a berm with a maximum 3:1 slope,a wrought-iron fence at the back edge of the buffer, landscaping and boulders within the planter areas in accord with these standards.If the unimproved street right-of-way is ten (10)feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer is required to maintain a ten-foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover; the landscape plan should be revised accordingly. The landscape plan depicts landscaping along pathways within the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. There are a lot of existing trees on the site,totaling 844 caliper inches,that are proposed to be removed as they were determined to be in poor condition by the Applicant's arborist(see arborist report and Sheet L1.6 of the landscape plan). The remaining trees,totaling 158 caliper inches, are required to Page 7 comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Additional trees are proposed in accord with the required standards. Common Open Space& Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G-3): Based on the standards in UDC Table 11- 3G-3, a minimum of 15%(or 2.09-acres)of qualified open space is required to be provided within the development. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VIII.D,that depicts 16.16%(or 2.25-acres) of open space that meets the required quality and qualified open space standards. Based on the standards in UDC 11-3G-4A, a minimum of two(2)points of site amenities are required to be provided. Two (2) sports courts(pickleball) (8 pts.)and(2)dog waste stations(1 pt.)are proposed, which total 9 points, exceeding UDC standards. Per the standards for such in UDC 11-3G-4C,dog waste stations are installed in the ground fixtures with waste disposal bags and trash receptacles; and sports courts are required to have markings and include benches for seating.Details should be submitted with the final plat application that demonstrate compliance with these standards. Pathways: No multi-use pathways are depicted on the Pathways Master Plan on this property. Sidewalks (11-3A-17): Five-foot wide attached sidewalks are required along internal local streets and detached sidewalks are required within street buffers along arterial streets per UDC 11-3A-17. For public safety,Staff recommends a 10-foot wide detached sidewalk is required along N.Meridian Rd.,an arterial street,as a provision of the development agreement as proposed on the landscape plan. Parking: Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on both sides of the street. Fencing: All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The Applicant's narrative states all existing perimeter fencing will either be retained and protected or replaced,and the developer will coordinate with all affected neighbors. The landscape plan depicts a 5' tall open vision wrought iron fence at the back edge of the street buffer along N. Meridian Rd. and adjacent to internal common open space areas; and a 6' tall cedar privacy fencing is proposed along the northern boundary of the site abutting the County parcel.Fencing appears to be missing in some areas adjacent to common open space areas; fencing should be provided to distinguish common from private areas in accord with UDC 11-3A-7A.7a. Waterways: The Knight Lateral crosses the eastern portion of this site within a 20-foot wide easement through common area as depicted on the plat. All irrigation ditches crossing this site shall be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.3. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. The Applicant's narrative states the Paramount HOA has agreed to allow the project irrigation system to connect to the Paramount Subdivision pressure irrigation system;therefore,the site will transfer its water rights to Paramount Subdivision and the site will utilize the existing Paramount Subdivision irrigation pump system. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18):An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances.Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. A Geotechnical Evaluation and geotechnical groundwater monitoring report was submitted with this application. Page 8 Building Elevations: Five(5)conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed 1-and 2- story homes with 2-and 3-car garages as shown in Section VIII.E. The homes are craftsman style with building materials consisting of a mix of board and batten siding, lap siding and optional masonry accents. The Applicant clarified that"optional"masonry accents depicted on the elevations is incorrect— all homes will have masonry accents consistent with the Paramount architectural guidelines. To ensure this for a higher quality of development, Staff recommends masonry accents are required on all structures in the development. The Applicant's narrative states the architecture and materials of the proposed homes will conform to the Paramount Architectural Design Standards,which include specific provisions regarding the exterior elevations,colors, accent materials, lighting, fencing and landscaping. Further, each floor plan will have multiple elevation designs with a variety of roof configurations(i.e.hip vs. gable)to provide more articulation and diversity from the street in addition to multiple color scheme choices. Design review is not required for single-family detached structures. However,because the rear and/or sides of homes facing N. Meridian Rd. will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets.Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement, and combined preliminary plat per the provisions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on April 18t1i.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Ben Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners (Applicant's Representative) b. In opposition: Andrew Pietella,Patrick Murphy,Zachary Tanis,Lee Cooper,Christine Huber Arnold,Lori Billaud(representing Cheryl Heard),Fernando De La Noche, William Gillen,Bob Beckman,Jamie Lajoie C. Commenting: Kyle Loveland,Don Doss(President of the Paramount HOA),June Gouvaia(voicemail) d. Written testimony: Ben Semple(Applicant's Representative)—in agreement with staff report conditions e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Not in favor of plat as proposed; opinion the density is too high and not consistent with that in Paramount Subdivision; b. Concern pertaining to the impact of traffic generated from this development on internal streets in Paramount subdivision. c. Request for construction methods/materials to match those in Paramount Subdivision. d. Not in favor of this development being part of the Paramount Subdivision HOA as it's not the same quality of development and opinion that it will bring home values down. e. Concern pertaining to overcrowding in area schools. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: Page 9 a. Clarification that if this development isn't included in the Paramount Subdivision HOA, it can still stand on it's own so far as meetin the he City's development requirements. b. No concerns pertainingto o capacity at area schools as there are several private schools in addition to public schools in this area that will assist in serving this development. c. Opinion the proposed subdivision is thoughtfully laid out with a maximum 2:1 transition in lots on the perimeter boundary,has good walkability and nice open space that exceeds the minimum standards. 4. Commission change, (s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 4,2024. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Ben Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners (Applicant's Representative): Sally Reynolds. Joe Weeks b. In opposition: Lori Billaud C. Commenting: Laura McDermott,Ramont Turnbull d. Written testimony: Ben Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners(Applicant's Representative) —in a2reement with the Commission's recommendation. Geoffrey Wardle.Aleksv Bobodzhanov(voicemail).neighbor(voicemail).Lee Cooper,Dawn Duckworth. e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application: Steve Siddowav 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. In support of the proposed density,rather than a higher density: appreciation for the Applicant working with the Paramount neighbors in an effort to have a more cohesive development: in favor of the proposed transition in density. Request for construction traffic to enter the site from Meridian Rd.rather than from internal residential streets. b. In opposition to the proposed development due to school overcrowding and incompatibility with the lot sizes and homes in the surrounding Paramount Subdivision: request for a better(i.e. 1:1)transition to existing lots. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. The possibility of revisions to the plat for a better transition(i.e. closer to 1:1) in lot sizes to existing lots in Paramount Subdivision along the southern boundary of the subdivision. b. The Park designation on the Future Land Use Map contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan on this property. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. Council included a new condition for the Applicant to revise the plat to remove two(2) lots along the south side of W. Gleason St.—one east of N. Garbo Ave. and one west of N. Garbo Ave.—as offered by the Applicant fcondition.#A.2c). Page 10 VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map Legal Description Pabblebrook Subdivision —Annexation A parcel located in the NE '/, of Section 25. Township 4 North. Range 1 West Boise Meridian. Ada County, Idaho. and more particularly deecrlbed as follo" Cornmer cEng at a Brass Cap monurnent marking the southeast corner of said NE Yj,,from whicr. a BraT,5 Cap rnonurnent marking the nontwast comer of said NE'/4 hears N 0"24753"E a dicta nce of 2661 OF fee'. Thence N 0'24-53'E along the easterly boundary of said NE f, a distance of 2e9.30 feet to the POINT OF BECMNNING: Thence Ieaviing sad easterly bDui-NJary of the NE %and along the nodherly boundary end the projaaion tftarricf of Paramount Subdivision No 21 ee shaven in -Book 105 of Plata on Pages 1423E ahrough 14240, and the easleely bowndory of Perarnount Su"vision No. 22 as shown in Bock 105 of Flits an Pages 14312 through 14,314,reoords of 4 9 County, ldatro. N 70'41'29"VY a distsmee of 1439 48 fee to a poet on the ee6tedy boundary of said Paramount Subdivision No. 221, Thence along said eai tWy bDundaay N (Y02'46"W a distance of 334.37 feet to a point on ttre southerly boundary of Paramaurn Subdivrawr4 No. 24 as efiown. in Book 107 or P1als on Pages 14797 through 14799, records of Ada County. Idaho_ Thence along said soultwly I:�Oundary and Me souftfty boundary or Pararri aunt Subd3)mmn No 27 as shown in gook 108 of Plats un Pages 15046 Vrrough 16048.records of Ada County+. Idaho, S 78'2646"E a distance of 962.67 feet to a point; Thence canbnuirrg Wong void sorffierly boundary of Paramount Subdivision No. 27 and Ule projecbw ftreof S 89"360T E a dislande-of 420.08 feet to a point on the saswdy boundary of ,said NE of Section 25. Thence along said easterly boundary S 0'24'53" VV a distance of 614.49 feet to the POINT OF 15EGINNl NO_ This parcel contains 13.94 acres and to Subject to any ea5+ereen:s exm6rig or in use. Clinton 1, -Hansn, PLS 113Lkpk LA No LoMd$alurlons, PC `g q;raiSTit February B, 2024 r of N w t� La171d 014J1lons *ft.�s�s �paaMbroJob eacasw5 mn.r+r w cM�w.y xa Page 11 PEBBLEBROOK SUBDIVISION - ANNFXATIGN EXHIBIT — --C CAT ED IN THE NE 114 OF SECTION 25 TOWN S Ffl P 4 NORTH, RANGE t WEST. 8M ADA COUNTY, IUAHO 2# 19 1[ CIII W BL1+D �5 � s+UaA I , 27 a ? JHPLATTM I � f S891TVE 4MVP � I I 4 r I � L4x PARCEL �R0� ur.,T� 51 26r4RW0 } TO-AL AREA = {J '3,94 . RES �l -►x PARCEL 14 ' I ! a UNPIXTFa or BEOWNG �S 30 f, ter} ti s r ,� II �LA"n lutions Surveying and Consulfing aa;ae�r: ,.T.4i9afa�5w Page 12 B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 4 4/l 7/24) -REVISED ir-Lgga x2gar gtiigqwiaae F�;;� 3 �8g� aadee8i a� 4�9oe s i e l B a ; � �€� flilliflifllfi� �I lEl ll��l E 3 I a g �1ij zo -a - f �I �d a a aaaa�gP4 � a�0lll.-Illlm�l.�IIII ICI �,L III�II--�'�-'-?� � -' •;' �� 1Ej ��sere gg5@leas _ x 19 : m LLU IU o IL wt 6 Jill ill �. :_. JW,q mrfl �; R Q 11 � g� URI` I11° WEE W � pp P q3q3 A ��`� � �•__ s ;� fit.. a g ion `g;J� i I §'J5 • i scp � .. I Page 13 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 2/13/2023)—REVISED cvoe Nvilikeig N 6411 I------ -----------I !I! Jf.V J H W IN N ---------- ---------- ............ j L---- 4� ---------- I r ----------- Di S. -4+4 Page 14 PROJECTINFORMATION � LANDSCPPE REOUIRFAffMS i Q o , •. , - _......-ohm o = I IEPHill i OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN "" 't - �L1.0 3 a x O � r �i \ r x ® a,.m,o_ f / B r _ / � � �• is�'� o r, ANIPRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA ONE S* Page 15 NREA �' \KEYMAP IFNOSCPPE IEG@1D r. r t .__ \ # Q rEeewM �smuuax iELIQ om�ew i z mo'.EMwrs /Al!PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA TWO r� � FRFA .THREE- AKEY MAP VJiD301PE LEGEND wen...w CPLLgR NOlE3.=OE!`� v � / u II_ r i � e i 'ti 1 v I re I II II Mpg f 8 II y� 3 g ilk PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA THREE Page 16 �yWROUGHT IRON FENCE (PLANTER BED CUT EDGE L+J�TYPFCALaTTFtEES-fR-T[TR�AFFET75� -..P•.�.•m.-�^�.•-...�.=-^-•pa..^ 4„QECIDLlOUS MV No,��Y��� .^•':"m.,.^�a•^e•®^ -� '..'"..""'" CEDAR FENCE �GROUNQCOVER PLANTING �w r_� �� v�.M. dam.•, � .�T• .a,..........�e--...p •esp. �� ROM- 'Te �1 SHRUB PLANTING �c1CDNIFEROUS TREE PLANTING �QDGIPOTm PET STATION .r _ L7.5 Page 17 Tree Mitigation Plan: 64 s �e 111 H � 1i��' �i F iE �!plp�s��s�l�ulylEl�II�I s p€"yR�� 1 lop tt g� eeeeeee....eeee��e P fi L_ w Arborist Report: https://ep1anreview.meridiancity.orb/ProiectDox/ActiveXiliewer.aspx?FilelD=1026739 Page 18 D. Common Open Space& Site Amenities Exhibit 4 z w w �o CYLLI Z of w ———- Il � g. co 0 � r—r r--1 r--1 r--1 r— r--1 r-- / r------7 z WQ ow U UQ ¢ g4 Il a3 i gg I II I z a 9LL InZy L_JL_JL_JL-JL-JL_JL�� coV! T HE y w 2' H ` ! z w aLL tl zNz 0¢m w O wl � h i r�i I �r r— r—�I rV — r— w 0gaQ p bj z w ZWi ;I I;I ;ILID � / w p u LL i o �5 _JL—JL_JL_JL—J _ OoI,z Q N __j LLJ Q J z 00 !! z =moo X—¢ ,wow CO ZY6 Lu a-0Oz f ! 1 Oo- Q f r ¢mw Lu oa_co z - � ICI ICI ) ! r ICI 1 -------J i L----�� Page 19 E. Conceptual Building Elevations - -—————————— ---------------- 1313 — -------— --------- ------- --------IN,, Hlri ------------- VFMIBN PLPPR -3-C GARdGE ----------- ----------------A TOP RATE�GOT. ------------------ ----------------- L L ---------—-------—--- EU d-------------------- mt --------------- eIZ IW-SP.4 ISATr a OL - am AM C LB Ab fiR[CW-c TOP PLATE gi 4 Imn . . . . . . TOP RATE -—————————————---— AD N DIIX 0 0 0 I'D C tAM -------------- -------- - O"40..ft ----------------------- W1 & , - ri SUM A NoW A SMX s&-WO- Come OPT-S-CAR OARAOa N'AT COWN IIMI MLWTLD' OPT.MASON —" "Q n WALL AND kV At A.1 11--AT Cp...w Page 20 IW4'GABLE vEW TIII QI 0EE PH-IL 4'—R TRIM :4"�K�PlLAL flRG ftal� S-W, FINIBN FLOOR 6/7 6/2 TOP PLATE --------------- --------------- —L"6 F. eEE AS PET.rL---, 'I------------------ Maeoeler AO C, T11 ---------------- OrT,3-CAR rlAp�lr AO 011IIII COFI ------ ------4 le'AT cgaffRB Ti=. �Ew, . . . . . . . . TT — . . . . 41"WEIR ■ el X±Aw WIN' FOORW A*MUD- =FLArE....... Lap TAL ---------------------- ------- --- 0 0rr ---OK.w1ofte As Smix 61 TZ El El - --- ---------------------- ------- ---- -* II rr ---------————---- ttAe .I TO P09W WALL AND IIIIIIII 017AIL m SI- §M=D- RI W&L Apo W.AT Om 3-CAR&AFI W47del uIIPAP to We, WILICMDO w. Nd caR Note: Masonry accents shall be provided on all front elevations. Page 21 IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property.Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat application shall not be submitted until the annexation is finalized. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision&Order for the Annexation request. The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Provide a 10-foot wide detached sidewalk within the required street buffer along N. Meridian Rd. as proposed. c. All homes within the development shall include a mix of materials, including masonry accents, as proposed by the Applicant. d. The rear and/or sides of homes facing N. Meridian Rd. shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop- outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. 2. The final plat submitted with the final plat application shall include the following revisions: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via N.Meridian Rd. is prohibited. b. Revise the configuration of Lots 7-9,Block 2 (abutting Lot 10,Block 49 in Paramount#21)and Lots 10-12,Block 2 (abutting two lots in Bordeaux Estates)to reflect a maximum 2:1 ratio. c. Remove two (2)lots along the south side of W. Gleason St.—one east of N. Garbo Ave. and one west of N. Garbo Ave. in an effort to provide closer to a 1:1 transition to existing adjacent lots in Paramount Subdivision. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall include the following revisions: a. Depict lawn or other vegetative groundcover on the east side of the sidewalk along N. Meridian Rd. as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C5,which states, "If the unimproved street right-of-way is ten (10)feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the developer is required to maintain a ten foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover." b. Depict fencing abutting all pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas in accord with UDC 11-3A-7A.7a. 4. All irrigation ditches crossing this site shall be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC II- 3A-6B.3. 5. With the final plat application, include a detail for the dog waste stations and sports courts that comply with the standards for such in UDC 11-3G-4C.Dog waste stations are required to be Page 22 installed in the ground fixtures with waste disposal bags and trash receptacles; and sports courts are required to have markings and include benches for seating. 6. A minimum of 2.25-acres of qualified open space shall be provided within the development in accord with the open space exhibit included in Section VIII.D. 7. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat,all existing structures shall be removed from the property. 8. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat. Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period,the director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title. 9. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the Applicant from compliance. B. PUBLIC WORKS https:llweblink.meridianciV.orelWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=341430&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=341460&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX D. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=344176&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX E. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridianciV.or,g/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=343172&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX F. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=341600&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=341434&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX H. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https:llweblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=344162&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX I. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=345969&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX Page 23 X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's request to annex the subject property with R-8 zoning and develop single-family detached dwellings on the site at a gross density of 3.87 units per acre is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan per the analysis in Section V. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to R-8 and development generally complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential uses should be compatible with adjacent single-family residential homes/uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. Comments were received from WASD on this applications due to the fairly small number of lots proposed, the impact should b is minimal at an estimated 17+/-school aged children for the development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision- making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the UDC and generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Page 24 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed right-of-way dedication for the expansion of N. Meridian Rd. is in conformance with the IFYWP to widen Meridian Rd. to 3-lanes from McMillan Rd. to SH-20126 (Chinden Blvd.) is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Page 25 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Horse Meadows Subdivision (FP-2024-0006) by KB Homes, located at 710 B. Black Cat Rd. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT !A H O DATE: 6/18/2024 Legend �!! TO: City Council Project Location - FROM: Stacy Hersh,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: FP-2024-0006 Horse Meadows Subdivision PROPERTY LOCATION: 710 N. Black Cat Rd., in the NW 1/4 of Section 10, T.3N., R.l W. (Parcel .,. #S1210325501) 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 26 building lots and four(4) common lots on 4.710-acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for Horse Meadows Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Sabrina Durtschi,KB Home— 1414 Bannock,Boise,ID 83702 B. Owner: Michael Carouba,Black Cat 30 LLC. — 1420 S. Mills Avenue No. 4,Lodi, CA 95242 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the associated preliminary plat(H-2020-0060,MDA H-2021-0050) as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts the same number of building lots and common open space area as shown on the approved preliminary plat. Consequently,the Applicant replaced the cul-de-sac with a hammerhead because two of the lots on the preliminary plat were found to be too small to be buildable. ACHD has requested that the Applicant submit a variance explaining the reasoning for the hammerhead approval request, and they have agreed to sign it once it is submitted. Additionally, a time extension for the preliminary plat was approved, extending the expiration Pagel date to January 12,2025. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plats as required by UDC 11-6B-3C. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 12/8/20) PR81D1INARY PLAT FOR HORSE MEAWWS SUBDIVISION 1 t LY]hTr]N 7�PO8'li¢NUFLH8 14441M OF THE 8W 1M OF:EC11ON 10. ' _ _ Mworsl rs ff r !I I > C r---- I imp "I �-- ---I -- --� -- -J -I _ j F•------1L I - - ° -- -- - �r - r ..� w ..� ...� 1 Page 2 B. Final Plat Plat Showing Horse Meadows SUMiVision Situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, J, Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, L City of Meridian, Ada County, Idoha. 2024 i' z ,owr e,v N D.sq.ns � 9 w.r��.�,a � 5cae: 1'�b• �,, 4 � �t'saF bT.ar xx MtY i -----; — -------- -"'° .w ,ese Ihn b e _. kO 4 vslleY r ax x � r� _ .___ ____ ' LA _-- �i;Or:.v _____ 4•L____ _______ ____ �- r' an wo' a„ mLe aeM --- ---- a -� �.�.,...,...•. L-Li axCY '"°'"'.^yarcl•1,•'M b,a - -�—y_'.1�ar=� pA �meW^��.L Mgge[M��NLw m L.s»'N'a'.�4Nr u.ww yM R LLCM St'M NT.W' .vr __—— xas�^^b e.wb.•,6,s.,e lei'.Tx.Rte ex..1s[ y q U� ea _ gppu Pege E u,a+de.a is si I�AHO SURVEY s•eei�,'�ae GROUP.LLC Page 3 C. Landscape Plan&Amenity Detail(dated: 5/20/24) T x u r I I I -- a .. I T` FFI � -0 0 ,�,-�,•�;�1 � � III O�G� ��__—_ __— _} �I , ------------ ------------- --- L——————————————————————— '---r-- ___ E LI00 E u.a�.•.=ws.1 u¢n� nwrrr sc�ouE ___ _ 4 __ _y___1__�_ ,�,�'"r"i - I I —I! w r II j Io �r li.++ is 1 W I- =:.. .,.,.... F �"--- p a.III• �,+ ,�i _=—„«. .:-M — I F L101 € E Page 4 CA 1- 14, �x� ._ - tL --- 1 ' I+I' .......,.,....'. .^.. ti.�®I.L N;win o"ca�L"• ••L.�oca oialLll..�.1:� — L— �_ — ------------------ i I I -------------------------------------- ji �- anwenn L103 OF E wun scan.. . _— T w L__________ S• - 7... o —. I. - - po -.. ,..,.._ F a ------ �-...�..��.».�.....�b.,M��. }}.or.....� ------- ------- -----7----------- --- ---- ---- 11 - � FLTL.Z-r�r •qy� I L,92 E Page 5 • � li B$ I I I I z 1 • � ` # IfLN1 llh I I I t I I VIM&L T TLCCTLIRE-AiPP'�OX MkT--WE 1 I Z;V BE t 3'MSE x If DEEP. SK&Z& — ST1tJCTJRE TYPE TO BE CHOSEN BY OMM ANS INSfALLATbDNAND FOOTINGS I :. PUt WA*KACFJRff`S R6D,AVENDATIOM } * ii p*. #I I # t E +': r (1)F Pp:W TABS VE M r-BENCH E 1 a'PKMC TABLE Y07"fl ACA "'%PL LA T LCG a"RAOmG wrrH 6• gENCFES,W=F-- =S'T-S.flY VICTOR,TAM Y I SURFAC€MOUN— -=_CErAi-S:&S iSQ,ibMALt PER UokNLFAt T'_'=-?REC U6pFNDATx)0 5. N4 TREES VVITtIN Page 6 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(Horse Meadows subdivision(H-2020-0060;MDA H-2021-0050, DA Inst. #2021-179237). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the Time Extension approval for the preliminary plat(i.e. by January 12, 2025); or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-613-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Idaho Survey Group, LLC, stamped on 2/29/2024 by Cody M. McCammon, included in Exhibit B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#7: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian water easement graphically depicted on the plat. b. Note#10: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD permanent easement. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Stack Group, dated 5/20/24 included in Exhibit C, shall be revised as follows: a. All storm drainage shall be designed according to the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinance per UDC 11-3A-11. b. The ROW along Black Cat Road shall meet the standards outlined in UDC 11-3B- 7.C.5; if the unimproved street right-of-way is ten(10) feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a ten-foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover. c. The landscape buffers shall not exceed 65% lawn coverage per UDC 11-3B- 7.C.3e. d. Apply for Alternative Compliance for trees missing in the central open space area on lot 6,Block 2. 6. Prior to signature on the Final Plat,the Applicant shall demonstrate that the existing easement that provides access to Parcels S 1210325555, S 1210325800, & S 1210325710) has been extinguished or relocated to the City's satisfaction. 7. Future development shall be consistent with the R-8 dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for all buildable lots. 8. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 9. The rear and/or sides of new homes facing N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Pone Ave. shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials,color,modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets per requirement of the development agreement Page 7 10. The Applicant shall adhere to all ACHD conditions of approval. 11. The Applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as outlined in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B, as applicable. 12. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works https://weblink.meridianciiy.ora/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=348111&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCity C. Kuna School District https://weblink.meridianciiy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=348148&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCity&cr=1 D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciiy.org/W ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=348112&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCity Page 8 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Reveille Ridge Subdivision H-2023-0050) Between City of Meridian, Endurance Holdings LLC (Owner), and Challenger Development (Developer) for Property Located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-033002 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=60 MATT BUNK 06/20/2024 08:39 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Endurance Holdings, LLC, Owner 3. Challenger Development, Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 18th day of June , 2024,by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642; and Endurance Holdings, LLC, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Rd., Meridian, Idaho 83642, hereinafter called OWNER; and Challenger Development, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Rd., Meridian, Idaho 83642, hereinafter called DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 59.97 acres of land with a request for the R-8 (34,69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28 acres) (Medium High- Density) zoning districts on the property as shown in Exhibit "A" under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 1 OF 8 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 141h day of May, 2024, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER: means and refers to Endurance Holdings, LLC, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Rd., Meridian, Idaho, 83642, hereinafter called OWNER, the party that owns said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 DEVELOPER: means and refers to Challenger Development, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Rd., Meridian, Idaho, 83642, hereinafter called DEVELOPER, the party developing said Property and shall include any subsequent developer(s) of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION (H-2023-0050) PAGE 2 OF 8 reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall generally comply with the development plans included in Section VIII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, attached hereto as Exhibit"B," and the provisions contained herein. b. A 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk/multiuse pathway shall be provided within the required street buffers along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site (i.e., S. Eagle Rd., E. Vantage Pointe, and St. L). c. The rear and/or sides of homes on lots that face collector(E. Vantage Pointe& St. L) and arterial (S. Eagle Rd.) streets shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following; modulation (e.g., projections, recesses, step- backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 3 OF 8 that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 4 OF 8 UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER: DEVELOPER: Endurance Holdings, LLC Challenger Development 1977 E. Overland Rd. 1977 E. Overland Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian, ID 83642 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 5 OF 8 had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property,which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 6 OF 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER: Endurance Hol ' gs, LLB f By: el & �. STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 1P day of_ e- ,2024,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known or identified to me to be the me,,-Joel- of Endurance Holdings,LLC antl the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ADAIR O TES (SNs�tj�sy Public- State of Idaho Notary Public Commission Number30062 My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 My Commission Expires: _jp / r� f DEVELOPER.- Challenger De lopment I STATE OF IDAIIO ) ` ss: -- County of Ada ) On this.10� da i of J Lk-e 2024,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared _, known or identified to me to be the of Challenger Development and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL,�DAIR KOLTES Notary Public / O Notary Public- State of Idaho My Commission Expires: Commission Number30062 My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 7 OF 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-18-2024 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-18-2024 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 18th day of June 2024, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION(H-2023-0050) PAGE 8 OF 8 EXHIBIT A Description for Annexation September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00012'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 00012'47" West, 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, South 00012'47" West, 250.04 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26"West, 560.00 feet; thence North 89018'26" West, 500.00 feet; thence South 89°48'34" West, 841.23 feet to the north-south centerline of said Section 5; thence on said north-south centerline, North 00000'59" East, 332.88 feet to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 5; thence continuing on said north-south centerline, North 00001'18" East, 820.62 feet; thence leaving said north-south centerline, South 78030'03" East, 191.66 feet; thence North 43000'19" East, 108.41 feet; thence North 68036'36" East, 694.84 feet; thence South 46002'32" East, 379.56 feet; thence South 64059'21" East, 64.51 feet; thence North 00023'06" West, 30.48 feet to the Southwest corner of Keep Subdivision as filled in Book 119 of Plats at Pages 18374 through 18379, records of Ada County, Idaho; �NIm- L ANO thence on the south boundary line of said Keep 5� �GENS `r F 6` Subdivision the following eight (8) courses and distances: 11 79 ox South 64048" 0" East, 66.24 feet; N,9ls�Z3 r° �OO9TF O F South 79033'09" East, 55.80 feet; yM McCpk Page 1 of 2 North 82037'38" East, 39.29 feet; North 71°27'43" East, 41.47 feet; North 80045'02" East, 58.56 feet; North 88058'42" East, 252.30 feet; North 85038'16" East, 60.03 feet; North 67003'39" East, 125.97 feet to the northwest corner of Derry Subdivision as filled in Book 108 of Plats at Pages 15160 and 15161, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence South 00013'22" West, 1157.89 feet to the southwest corner of said Derry Subdivision thence on the south boundary line of said Derry Subdivision and the easterly prolongation of, South 74008'45" East, 762.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 59.969 acres, more or less. End of Description. D GE NsF sG 11779 8�2,23� �0p9TF O F yM MCCN Page 2 of 2 I Keep SR�o Subdivision � L6 I N683 9S6?F L7 L10 L8 L11 L2 L4 L5� L12 L9 N iQ O N ) 00 I ao W f� o f59.969 Acres N subatiiiSion z I i2 I o I 0 C1/4 1/4• u 0 � 0 00 M Point of z M 500.00- S S24 0a 45 It Beginning . S89'48'34"W 841.23' N89'18'26"W 6p 00, .4,5, N,3 29 6. W I J I N74 p8'26„4, 800 00, Line Table Line Table _cnv I rn Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length I O.c (0 o L1 S00'12'47"W 250.04' L8 N82'37'38"E 39.29' cV v m L2 S78'30'03"E 191.66' L9 N71'27'43"E 41.47' t ' w 04 i- o L3 N43'00'19"E 108.41 L10 N80'45'02"E 58.56' o,I tti c4-•N L4 S64'59'21"E 64.51' L11 N88'58'42"E 252.30' Li1 Q1 O v vi O m L5 N00'23'06"W 30.48' L12 N85'38'16"E 60.03' N L6 S64'48'10"E 66.24' L13 N67'03'39"E 125.97' L7 S79-33'09"E 55.80, I I ONNL LAND �`CE"SF s G 117 79 0 N9 7e3Q�O E. Columbi a Rd S.5 S.4 O�y F OF �� O? Scale: 1"=400' S.8 S.9 M, MCCPM� 0 100 200 400 800 P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eogle Rd) 22-228\dwg\Anne.otian E..dwg 9/8/2023 7:39:32 AM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. DAHO 22-228-02 SURVEY 9955W AHO837 ST Annexation 9 55W.EMERALD a83704 Sheet No. (108)816.8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP, LLC A pracel of land located in the St 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date ij the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023 Description for R-8 Zone September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00°12'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 00012'47" West, 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, South 00012'47" West, 250.04 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26"West, 408.38 feet; thence North 47047'31"West, 770.77 feet; thence North 42012'29" East, 255.28 feet; thence 169.79 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 32°25'39", and a long chord which bears North 64°00'20" West, 167.53 feet; thence North 47047'31" West, 512.02 feet; thence 46.08 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 26°24'07", and a long chord which bears North 34035'27" West, 45.67 feet; thence North 21°23'24" West, 28.22 feet; thence South 68036'36" West, 166.53 feet; thence 8.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 04035'37", and a long chord which bears South 66018'47" West, 8.02 feet; thence North 47047'31" West, 150.16 feet; thence North 43000'19" East, 21.57 feet; Or1Pp- LANA \GE N sty SG thence North 68036'36" East, 694.84 feet; 1 thence South 46002'32" East, 379.56 feet; 779/t�Z3�� thence South 64059'21" East, 64.51 feet; c�0O9TF OF \�PO� YM MCCP�`� Page 1 of 2 thence North 00°23'06" West, 30.48 feet to the Southwest corner of Keep Subdivision as filled in Book 119 of Plats at Pages 18374 through 18379, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on the south boundary line of said Keep Subdivision the following eight (8) courses and distances: South 64048'10" East, 66.24 feet; South 79033'09" East, 55.80 feet; North 82037'38" East, 39.29 feet; North 71°27'43" East, 41.47 feet; North 80045'02" East, 58.56 feet; North 88058'42" East, 252.30 feet; North 85038'16" East, 60.03 feet; North 67003'39" East, 125.97 feet to the northwest corner of Derry Subdivision as filled in Book 108 of Plats at Pages 15160 and 15161, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence South 00013'22" West, 1157.89 feet to the southwest corner of said Derry Subdivision thence on the south boundary line of said Derry Subdivision and the easterly prolongation of, South 74008'45" East, 762.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 34.691 acres, more or less. End of Description. �NNk- L ANO �GENSF `rG 1 779 c) 'A 8�2oz3P0 OF YM MCCN Page 2 of 2 I I Keep aA, SA Subdivision �6 36 E -N ��� L7 L4 Ng8 S6,,�F L8 L11 L2 L9 L12 L5 L6 L13 O�' L10 C3 S68'36'36"W O 166.53' cl� Derry N42'12'29"E C/ N Subdivision 255.28' Acres l _ 0 0 C1/4 �j,� 1/4• S.5 .S.4 �j Point of �>j, S7408, Beginning 45" ice. 408 38. 762.45• N732g2s" N 74 08 26"w 800.00J . i� N Nv) ��CENSF `r G Line Table Line Table (0 QLine Bearing Length Line Bearing Length a] � v- 1 a 7 7 9 L1 S00'12'47"W 250.04' L8 S79'33'09"E 55.80' , N N� g�COZ3.ro & � N L2 N21'23'24"W 28.22' L9 N82'37'38"E 39.29' �° 1 - o 4fOF �M�p� L3 N47'47'31"W 150.16' L10 N71'27'43"E 41.47' O m MICA In o) L4 N43'00'19"E 21.57' L11 N80'45'02"E 58.56' L5 S64'59'21"E 64.51' L12 N88'58'42"E 252.30' N Scale: 1"=400' L6 N00'23'06"W 30.48' L13 N85'38'16"E 60.03' I 0 100 200 400 800 1 L7 S64'48'10"E 66.24' L14 N67'03'39"E 125.97' Curve Table i Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 169.79' 300.00' 32'25'39" N64'00'20"W 167.53' E. Columbia Rd. S.5 S.4 C2 46.08' 100.00' 26'24'07" N34'35'27"W 45.67' S.8 S.9 C3 8.02' 100.00' 4'35'37" S66-18'47"W 8.02' P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eogle Rd) 22-228\dwg\R-8 Zone Ez.dwg 9/8/2023 8:45:53 AM IDAHO Exhibit Drawin^gQfor 22Job No. o2 SURVEY 9OSE, AHO83704ERALD R—S Zone 9955 W.EM083704 Sheet No. (208)846-8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP LLC A pracel of land located in the S1 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date ' the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023 Description for R-15 Zone September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00012'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 000 12'47" West, 708.15 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26" West, 408.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 73029'26" West, 151.62 feet thence North 89018'26" West, 500.00 feet; thence South 89048'34" West, 841.23 feet to the north-south centerline of said Section 5; thence on said north-south centerline, North 00000'59" East, 332.88 feet to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 5; thence continuing on said north-south centerline, North 00001'18" East, 820.62 feet; thence leaving said north-south centerline, South 78030'03" East, 191.66 feet; thence North 43°00'19" East, 86.84 feet; thence South 47047'31" East, 150.16 feet; thence 8.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 04°35'37", and a long chord which bears North 66018'47" East, 8.02 feet; thence North 68036'36" East, 166.53 feet; thence South 21°23'24" East, 28.22 feet; thence 46.08 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of �NPt- LAN� 26024'07", and a long chord which bears South �GENSF `S 34035'27" East, 45.67 feet; o thence South 47047'31" East, 512.02 feet; 11 79 o N.A z3,r C�p 91 F OF yM McCIN, Page 1 of 2 thence 169.79 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 32°25'39", and a long chord which bears South 64000'20" East, 167.53 feet; thence South 42012'29" West, 255.28 feet; thence South 47047'31" East, 770.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 25.278 acres, more or less. End of Description. �Np,L L ANO 5� �GENSF S 11779 (� z �00 9 F F yM MCCN Page 2 of 2 I Keep Subdivision I I I L2\.y �R 5 L6 C1 S [p 5r 04 00 Derry o f 25 278 Subdivision z I Acres S42'12'29"W I / 255.28' C1/4 SAS), 1/4• w ��,, S.5 .S.4 O o0 F> p M O) O M z /.500,00' I in S89'48'34"W 841.23' N89'18'26"W L� 408 8 100 Beginning f N�32g 26-g, I g g N74 08 26"W 8p0,pp, I� CV cn OVAL LANp r i Q' �\GENS `r Line Table N v 1 779 O Line Bearing Length �m .- Of P g�2oZ3�o L1 N73'29'26"W 151.62' N � o oI cn It —(n C'O 9rF OF L2 S78'30'03"E 191.66' w I rn o 0 OyM, McCA L3 N43'00'19"E 86.84' vi I o m L4 S47'47'31"E 150.16' L5 N68'36'36"E 166.53' N Scale: 1"=400' L6 S21'23'24"E 28.22' 1 0 100 200 400 800 Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chard Bearing Chord Length C1 8.02' 100.00' 4'35'37" N66'18'47"E 8.02' E. Columbi and. C2 46.08' 100.00' 26'24'07" S34'35'27"E 45.67' C3 169.79' 300.00' 32'25'39" 1 S64'00'20"E 167.53' P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eogle Rd) 22-228\dwg\R-15 Zone EK.dwg 9/8/2023 8:56:41 AM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. DA H O Zone 22—228—02 SURVEY 9OSE,EMERALD R-1 ZOIIG Sheet No. BOISE,IDAHO 83704 (201)846-8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP, LLC A pracel of land located in the S1 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-, AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 59.97-Acres of Land with R-8 (34.69 acres) and R- 15 (25.28 acres)Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 242 Building Lots and 38 Common Lots on 59.77-Acres of Land in the R-8 and R-15 Zoning Districts for Reveille Ridge Subdivision,by Bailey Engineering. Case No(s).H-2023-0050 For the City Council Hearing Dates of. March 26,April 16, and May 7, 2024 (Findings on May 14, 2024) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7,2024, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2023-0050 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 1 I-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2023-0050 -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code §67-6521(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may, within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code.This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2024 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2023-0050 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 14th day of May 2024. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) M 5-14-2024 By Elizabeth Strader, Vice President Attest: 1 C - `ohnso 5-1 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: N ycW"l Dated: 5-14-2024 City Clerk's Office F FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2023-0050 -4- STAFF REPORT E IDIAN�-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT p HEARING May 7,2024 Legend DATE: Continued from:March 26, and April.f P Prolec= Loco?or. 16, 2024 lei TO: Mayor&City Council 5 FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner ` 208-884-5533 ----- SUBJECT: Reveille Ridge Subdivision—AZ,PP --,- ----- H-2023-0050 --- '}- LOCATION: 7355 S. Eagle Rd.,in the east'/2 of Section 5, T.2N.,R.1E. (Parcels: 51405417400, 51405142100, S1405427800& 51405131500) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of 59.97 acres of land with R-8 (34.69 acres) and R-15 (25.28 acres)zoning districts; and Preliminary Plat consisting of 246 building lots and 38 common lots on 59.77 acres of land in the R-8 and R- 15 zoning districts for the Reveille Ridge Subdivision. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Acreage 59.77 acres Future Land Use Designation Low Density Residential(LDR)(31+/-acres)&Medium Density Residential (MDR)(28+/-acres) Existing Land Use Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family detached/attached&townhome dwellings Current Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT)in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8 (Medium Density Residential)&R-15 (Medium-high Density Residential) Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 246 building/38 common Phasing plan(#of phases) 4 Number of Residential Units(type 170 single-family detached, 14 single-family attached, 62 townhome units of units) Density(gross&net) 4.13 units/acre overall(gross)(2.96 units/acre in LDR; 5.3 units/acre in MDR) Open Space(acres,total[%]/ 11.78 acres(or 19.71%) buffer/qualified) Amenities Pathways,picnic areas,fitness stations. Physical Features(waterways, The Williams Northwest gas pipeline runs through this site within a 75'wide hazards,flood plain,hillside) easement.The Farr Lateral runs along the northern boundary on the east portion of the site. Neighborhood meeting date 6/15/23 History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Not yet • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no • TIS(yes/no) Yes • Level of Service(LOS) Eagle Road south of Lake Hazel Road is operating at a LOS of better than "D"according to the TIS. • Existing Conditions There is one driveway serving the existing home via S.Eagle Rd.,a 2-lane roadway • CIP/IFYWP No improvements planned directly abutting the site.Lake Hazel Rd. is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grove to Eagle Rd. in 2024 and to 5-lanes from Eagle to Cloverdale Rd.in 2025.The intersection of Lake Hazel&Eagle Rd.is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,4-lanes on the south,4-lanes on the east, and 3-lanes on the west leg to be reconstructed in 2024. Access(Arterial/Collectors/State One(1)access is proposed via S.Eagle Rd.,a residential arterial street. A Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) north/south and an east/west collector street are proposed. Several stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for future extension and interconnectivity. Proposed Road Improvements No funded improvements and no planned improvements. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 1.0 mile from Station 7 • Fire Response Time Project falls in an area where the FD doesn't have total response times for an effective firefighting force that meet NFPA 1710 standards or current City adopted standards. • Resource Reliability Unknown for Station 7 as it just opened;77%for Station 4,which doesn't meet the 80%goal • Risk Identification 2(current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project) • Accessibility Meets all requirements • Special/resource needs Will require an aerial device;can meet this need • Water Supply 1,000 gallons/minute for one hour • Other Resources Police Service No comments received School District(s) No comments received Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services • Sewer Shed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See application • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Flow is committed. See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Water • Distance to Services Water available at site. • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project Water ERU's See application • Water Quality Concerns None • Project Consistent with Water Yes I Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section IX.B of this report. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend Legend [ Project Lacatan �- leiProje--t Laco�or .rt me iu si ee tial Lovw density , Residential o`W Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend 0 Legend ffPro" t Locator. 4 Pro"1 t Locafior 1� � - CityLdnih� — Manned ParcL-'s � R_ RUT - i i R-4 '9 R-1. 5 � II RUT -R= -RR RUT M1 ---- -y}k= III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Judy Schmidt, Bailey Engineering— 1119 E. State St.,#210,Eagle,ID 83616 B. Owners: Endurance Holdings,LLC— 1977 E. Overland Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Shawn Brownlee, Trilogy Development—9839 W. Cable Car St., Ste. 101,Boise,ID 83709 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in 1/30/2024 3/10/2024; 4/21/2024 newspaper Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 1/26/2024 3/1/2024 Public hearing notice sign posted on site 1/24/2024 3/12/2024 Nextdoor posting 1/30/2024 3/4/2024; 4/9/2024 Note: This project was continued to the May 7th City Council hearing in order to notice the Kuna School District, who was inadvertently not included in the previous transmittals, andprovide an opportunity for comment. V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS FUTURE LAND USE: Approximately 31-acres of the eastern portion of this property is designated Low Density Residential(LDR)and approximately 28-acres of the western portion is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR)on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan (see map above in Section II.C). The LDR allows for the development of single-family homes on large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. These areas often transition between existing rural residential and urban properties. Developments need to respect agricultural heritage and resources,recognize view sheds and open spaces, and maintain or improve the overall atmosphere of the area. The use of open spaces,parks,trails, and other appropriate means should enhance the character of the area. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. TRANSPORTATION: ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM)depicts an east/west collector street across this property from S.Eagle Rd. to the west property boundary and a north/south collector street along the west boundary of the site. This property is within the area governed by the South Meridian Transportation Plan. No improvements are planned directly abutting the site in the CIP or IFYWP. Lake Hazel Rd. is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grove to Eagle Rd. in 2024 and to 5-lanes from Eagle to Cloverdale Rd. in 2025. The intersection of Lake Hazel&Eagle Rd. is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,4-lanes on the south,4-lanes on the east, and 3-lanes on the west leg to be reconstructed in 2024. PROPOSED USE: The subject property is proposed to develop with a mix of single-family residential detached and attached dwellings and townhome dwellings at a gross overall density of 4.13 units per acre (2.96 units/acre in LDR and 5.30 units/acre in MDR)consistent with the density desired in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Goals,Objectives,&Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) The proposed single-family attached and detached dwellings and townhome dwellings will provide a mix of housing types to meet the needs,preferences and financial capabilities of present and future residents in the City as desired. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices."(3.07.01A) The proposed site design with smaller lot sizes abutting similar size lots to the north planned in Vertex Subdivision and to the west adjacent to Discovery Park, a 75-acre City park, and MDR designated property to the west and south; and larger lots abutting similar size lots to the north in The Keep Subdivision and to LDR designated property to the east will provide a good transition in density and lot sizes to existing and future development. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed residential uses and site layout should minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems with development of the subdivision;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity."(2.02.01D) A 10'wide multi-use pathway is proposed through the site from the south to the north boundary within the Williams Pipeline easement and a 5'wide pathway is proposed along the Farr Lateral on the northeast portion of the site, which should be widened to 10'in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Other micro paths and internal pathways are proposed for pedestrian connectivity within the development. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks are required to be provided with development of the subdivision. • "Eliminate existing private treatment and septic systems on properties annexed into the City and instead connect users to the City wastewater system; discourage the prolonged use of private treatment septic systems for enclave properties." With redevelopment of the site, the septic system for the existing home should be abandoned. • "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross- access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity."(6.01.02B) There is currently one(1) access driveway via S. Eagle Rd.for this property, which will be replaced by a collector street that will extend to the west boundary of the site for future extension.Another north/south collector street is proposed along the west boundary of the site for future extension to the north and south. These collector streets should increase connectivity in this area and distribute traffic from the arterial street. Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties to the north fronting on S. Eagle Rd., which should reduce access points to the arterial street in the future. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION(AZ) The Applicant proposes to annex 59.97 acres of land with R-8 (34.69-acres) and R-15 (25.28-acres) zoning districts and develop the site with a mix of single-family attached and detached and townhome dwellings at densities consistent with the underlying LDR and MDR FLUM designations as discussed above in Section V. A legal description and exhibit map for the overall annexation area is included in Section VIII.A along with individual legal descriptions and exhibit maps for individual zones. This property is within the City's Area of City Impact boundary. A preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is proposed to be subdivided and developed with 246 building lots and associated common area and public streets(see Section VIII). Single-family attached and detached and townhouse dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in both the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts per UDC Table 11-2A-2. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the subject property develops as proposed, Staff recommends a DA is required with the provisions discussed herein and included in Section IX.A. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP): The proposed preliminary plat consists of 246 building lots and 38 common lots on 59.77 acres of land in the proposed R-8 and R-15 zoning districts as shown on the preliminary plat in Section VIII.B. A mix of front- and alley-loaded single-family detached(170), single-family attached(14) and townhomes(62) are proposed. Building lots range in size from 2,600 square feet(s.f.)(or 0.6-acre)to 14,798 s.f. (or 0.34- acre). Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in four(4)phases per the phasing plan in Section VIII.B. The first phase is located along the southern boundary of the site and includes construction of all of the collector streets within the site. The second phase is the northeast portion of the development. The third phase is centrally located and contains the pond and most of the common open space for the development, including the linear open space in the Williams Pipeline easement. The fourth phase is the northwest portion of the development. Staff recommends the phasing plan is revised to switch Phases 2 and 3 so the open space is provided in an earlier phase for the enjoyment of residents. The phasing plan has been revised as recommended. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and several other structures on the property that are not being retained that are required to be removed prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer's signature.There is also an existing driveway via S. Eagle Rd. that will be replaced with a public street. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and future development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district and Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district, as applicable. Zero(0) setbacks should be depicted on the plat where single- family attached and townhome structures are proposed to span across lot lines where no easements will exist.Note: Street setbacks are measured from back of sidewalk,which will affect building placement on lots along collector streets. Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards: The proposed subdivision is required to comply with the design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3,including those for streets and alleys. Product Type: A mix of single-family attached and detached and townhome dwellings are proposed to develop on the site as shown on the exhibit map in Section VIII. Access: Public streets and alleys and a common driveway are proposed for access within the development. Two (2)collector streets are proposed in accord with ACHD's Master Street Map as noted above in Section V. Homes fronting on the collector streets do not have access from the collector streets. Public stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties to the northeast,north,west and south for future interconnectivity and to reduce future access points on S. Eagle Rd., in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.3. A common driveway is proposed on Lot 51,Block 16 for access to Lots 52-54,Block 16; compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D for such is required. A perpetual ingress/egress is required as a note on a recorded final plat or a separate recorded easement. The easement or plat note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A common driveway exhibit that demonstrates compliance with the R-15 dimensional standards is included in Section VIII.F; future development of these lots should be consistent with this exhibit.Fencing is required along Lot 51,Block 16 to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A.7a.A 5-foot wide landscape buffer planted with shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover should be provided along the southwest side of the common driveway on Lot 51,Block 16 in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.5. Pathways: All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. A 10' wide multi-use pathway is required within the Williams Pipeline easement and along the south side of the Farr Lateral in a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Other pathways are proposed throughout the site for internal pedestrian connectivity. The 10-foot wide multi-use pathway within the Williams Pipeline easement should be extended through Lot 1, Block 14 for future extension to the south. The 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Farr Lateral in Lot 16,Block 2 should also be extended to the northwest to connect to the multi-use pathway in Vertex Subdivision to the north.In order to provide connectivity between the multi- use pathways within the site, Staff recommends a 10-foot wide sidewalk is provided along Taps to between the Williams pipeline pathway and the Farr Lateral pathway. Sidewalks/Parkways(11-3A-17): For public safety, Staff recommends 10-foot wide detached sidewalks are provided along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site; parkways should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. The plat and landscape plan, should be revised accordingly. Landscaping: A minimum 25-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Eagle Rd., an arterial street, measured from ultimate back of curb location; and 20-foot wide street buffers are required along E. Vantage Pointe and St L, collector streets,per UDC Tables 11-2A-6 and 11-2A-7. The buffer along E. Vantage Pointe on Blocks 12 and 15 needs to be fully landscaped,including the area on the back side of the sidewalk.Landscaping is required within the street buffers and parkways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3; the landscape plan should be revised to include a mix of landscaping materials and a calculations table that demonstrates compliance with the standards.All street buffers should be in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement maintained by the property owner or homeowner's association; street buffers should be depicted on the plat accordingly and labeled as such. Landscaping,including trees and shrubs,should be depicted on the landscape plan within the 5' wide landscape strip on each side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C.Note:Alternative compliance may be requested for the trees along the pathway in the Williams pipeline easement as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5. There are several existing trees on the site—where possible,existing trees should be retained. Mitigation is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5; calculations demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standards should be depicted on the landscape plan. Common Open Space& Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G-3): A minimum of 15% (or 8.97-acres)common open space is required to be provided in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts per UDC Table I1-3G-3. Open space areas are required to comply with the quality standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3A.2. The qualifications for open space are outlined in UDC 11-3G-3B. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VIII.D that depicts common open space totaling 14.79-acres(or 24.74%); qualified open space consists of 11.77-acres(or 19.69%), exceeding the minimum standard. Qualified areas consist of open grassy areas of at least 5,000 square feet in area, linear open space, a pond with site amenities (i.e.picnic areas), and active and passive open spaces. Based on 59.77-acres of development area, a minimum of 12 site amenity points is required to be provided. For projects such as this that are over 40-acres in size,multiple amenities are required from each of the categories listed in UDC Table 11-3G-4. The Applicant proposes amenities in accord with the minimum standards from each of the required categories, as follows: T e Description Points Quality of Life Picnic Areas 3 6 Pedestrian Amenities Multiuse Pathways .5 miles 2 Quality of Life Fitness Course 6 stations 2 Recreation Activity Tot Lot 1 hiutti-modal Bike Repair Station I Total 12 The proposed amenities should comply with the associated standards listed in UDC 11-3G-4C, D, E and F. Open Water Pond: An open water pond exists on the site that is proposed to remain on Lot 1, Block 16. The pond is required to have recirculated water and be maintained such that it does not become a mosquito breeding ground as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3B.6. Parking: Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. Two(2) off-street parking areas with a total of 16 parking spaces are proposed on Lots 20 and 80,Block 16. Williams Pipeline: The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline crosses this site within a 75-foot wide easement contained in common lots as depicted on the preliminary plat. Any development and/or improvements within the easement should comply with the Williams Developer's Handbook. Waterways: The Farr Lateral exists along the eastern portion of the northern boundary of the site within a 55-foot wide easement(25-feet on the north side and 30-feet on the south side of the lateral's centerline). All irrigation ditches and laterals crossing this site that aren't being improved as a water amenity or linear open space as defined in UDC 11-1A-1 are required to be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.3,unless otherwise waived by City Council. The Applicant requests a waiver from Council to leave the Farr Lateral open and not pipe it as allowed in UDC 11-3A-6B.3a. To preserve public safety,the Applicant proposes to construct a 6' tall wrought iron fence along the northern boundary of Lot 16,Block 2 outside of the Boise Project Board of Control's easement in accord with UDC 11-3A-6C and the Pathways Master Plan. Fencing: All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and I1-3A-7, as applicable. The landscape plan depicts a mix of 6' tall vinyl privacy fencing and 5' tall wrought iron fencing. Because there is a common lot with a pathway planned in Vertex Subdivision along the northern boundary of the site,Staff recommends the fencing in this location is changed to 5'tall wrought iron fencing to match that on the north side of the pathway and that proposed on this site to the east along the Farr Lateral in accord with UDC 11-3A-7A.7b. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. A pressure reducing station is proposed on Lot 1,Block 19. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18):An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. A Geotechnical Evaluation was submitted with this application. Building Elevations: Several conceptual building elevations of 1-and 2-story single-family detached, attached and townhome dwellings were submitted as shown in Section VIII.E. Building materials consist of a variety of horizontal and vertical siding and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents. Because homes on lots that face collector(E.Vantage Pointe& St L) and arterial(S.Eagle Rd.) will be highly visible, Staff recommends the rear and/or sides of structures facing these streets incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. Design review is required for all single-family attached and townhome structures; design review is not required for single-family detached structures. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement, and preliminary plat per the provisions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on February 15t''. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: David Bailey,Bailey Engineering(Applicant's Representative) b. In opposition: Dave White,Jeff Luckey,Brian Miller,Jarron Langston, CraigSith, Carrie Miller,Matthew Pond c. Commenting d. Written testimony: Kelli Black,Bailey Engineering(Applicant's Representative)—in agreement with staff report, and several letters of opposition from the public(see public record). e. Staff presenting_application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Opinion the proposed density is too high for this development with existing infrastructure constraints; b. Concern pertaining to safety of roads in the immediate area; c. Request for a better transition in lot sizes to adjacent properties. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Would like to see a better transition in lot sizes to adjacent existing properties,especially to The Keep to the north. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. The Applicant requests City Council approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B.3a to leave the Farr Lateral open and not pipe it as allowed in UDC 11-3A-6B.3a. To preserve public safety,the Applicant proposes to construct a 6' tall wrought iron fence along the northern boundary of Lot 16,Block 2 outside of the Boise Project Board of Control's easement adjacent to the pathway. b. The Commission requested the City Council review the transition of the proposed R-8 zoned lots to the existing R-2 lots in The Keep subdivision along the Farr Lateral and decide if the proposed transition is in the best interest of the City. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on March 26. and May 7,2024. At the public hearing on May 7'the Council approved the proposed AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: David Bailey, Bailey Engineering(Applicant's Rep_ resentatiye) b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Bryan Miller, Carrie Miller,Jeff Luckey,Lori Billaud.Jarron Langston:Whitney Smith: Cheri Ure:Robbie Reno,Kuna School District d. Written testimony: Craig Smith:Kelli Wilkins e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Letter from Craig Smith—Request for a better transition(i.e. larger/fewer lotsl abutting his 5-acre property to the east of the site similar to that discussed to The Keep to the north: b. Letter from Kelli Wilkins—Opposed to the density of the proposed development— reguest for lower density(i.e. larger/fewer lots) abutting her 5-acre property to the east. C. Concern pertainingto the proposed density(too high),not enough transition in lot sizes to existing lots in The Keep subdivision,concern to pertaining to existing roads not being adequate to serve the development: d. Testimony from Whitney Smith,requesting retention of the existing berm and trees along the east boundary of the site adjacent to her property and a better transition in lot sizes(i.e. 2:1 or less). e. Testimony was provided from Robbie Reno.Kuna School District,that their elementary and high schools are currently over capacity and concern pertaining to serving additional students due to a recent bond failure to increase capacity. f. Concern pertaining to impacts on area schools due to lack of capacity and impact on area roadways from traffic generated from the proposed development: g. Opinon the proposed development is too high of density for this area. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Lot transitions, safety for children with retention of the existing pond and impact on area schools. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. The Council approved the Applicant's request for a waiver to leave the Farr Lateral open and not pipe it. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map Description for Annexation September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 112 of the Northeast 114, and the North 112 of the Southeast 114 of Section 5.Township 2 Norlh, Range 1 East, Boise Me6dian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 114 corner common to Sections 4 ana b, 7.2N.,R.1E., B,M-,from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, 6-M_,hears South 00'12'47"Wast. 2653.27;thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 00912'47"West, 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, South 0012'47"West, 2 50.04 feet; thenca IQa+ring said oast boundary line,North 74°b8'26"West.800.00 feet; thence North 73°2926"Vest,560.00 feet; thence North 89°18'26"West.500,80 feet: thence South 89°48'34"West, 841.23 feet to the north-south centerline of said Section 5; thence on said north-south centerline, North 00°00'59"East, 332.88 feet to the Center 114 corner of said Section 5: thence continuing on said north-south oentedine. North 00°01'18" East,820.62 feet: thence leaving said north-south centerline. South 78°30'03"East, 191.66 feet; thence North 43"00'19"East, 108.41 feet; thence North 68°36'36"East, 694.84 feet; thence South 46"02'S2"East, �70.M feet: thence South '5921" East,64.51 feet; thence North 00°2NOV West, 30.48 feet to the Southwest corner of Keep Subdivision as filled in Book 119 of Plats at Pages 18374 through 18379,records of Ada County, Idaho; P,� L'1'y0 thence on the south boundary line of said Keep Ns Subdivision the following eight(8)courses and distances; 11779 South 64"48'10"East,6b ��,24 feet; n , r South 79"33'09"East,55.80 feet; - 'f m o, Page 1 of 2 Norm 02°3738' East, M,29feet; NOM 71°2Y43" East,At d]feel; Noah 80"4602" East, 5858 had; NOM 88.5942" East, 252.30 head; NOM 859818"Est, 8003 fast', NMh 87'03'39-Est, 125.97 feat to the iwtlbwssl wmer of Omry SUEEivisim as file! in Book 108 of plate at Pages; 15160 and 15151, reexds of Ads Cwnry, Naln; Mena Bonn 00-13'22'Nba41157 BE feat to the wuMwest wmer W sad DerryS thxlwlsicn thanes an the soNF bovgary line of Sad Derry SUEdwieion and the enskdy pmkin9adon IN, GOWN WD64V" Eael 78215 head to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 59.889 Sues, more or ens. End of fascdp8w- Ir Page 2 of 2 �ESs•eL �y�.. WBB� �rtW,h L) 10 C\5 J i u � il g /jj 159.969 Avee � fI%I, C1/! 4 ° 5.5 1iS 4 Rm POF\ 50&00' �agyag`EBKMnF9 ij. SBY46']4b 841.'1V BTB'W 580. �.b• N>atyle w Bmm. Line Table line Table Ilne 5gF9 LmBlll _ Ll S4019'47'W 35PW L3 S78']e'0]4 191.66' LB NJI'9T4JE Q4J' • _ m 0 N43VVI 'E 10&41' 0 NBO'W'OSE 58.58' v I,� r _ SB45 E 6A51' 8m 40033'CB'W 30AB' L10 XES']Y16E 60.0]' N m L1] X6JOJ'%'E 1E&W' V S7MOVE 55.8V 1a779 --ca.mel___ eYk YWAM�� Se &e so 0100 ]00 400 800 IDARO Annexation Exbm¢ OMWing for SURVEY w RIE a SubdMslm H 1 N. Reveille GROUP, LLC °1 '^ 1. 0n o.1 Descriptor for R4 Zone September 8. W23 A parcel of land bated in the South 1l2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North la Of the Southeast 1/4 Of macron 5, TDNwNP 2 Nmin, Range 1 East Buse Mercian Ada County, Icahe, more particularly resumetl as follows'. Commencing an the 114 tamer common to Emotions and 5, T 2N., N.1 E, B M.,from whicin the 3eclion turner common b Secrons 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R 1,E, B.M., bean South 00°12'47'Mat 203,27, thence on fine east boundary line of said Sector 5, SONM1 M-1247'Mat 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING', thence continuing. South 00°12'4r Nast, 250.04 fact, tlnence leaving saitl mad boundary line, North 74"OB'26'West 80000 feet', thence North 73°2926'Nark 408.38 faN; thence Norh 41°4]'31"Nark ]10.]7 far; then NMM1 42.17Zv Ear, 255,28 k : thence 189.79 fee on the am of a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, a arhel angle 0132°2534', and a long chwN which beare North U'00'20'Me, 16]53 Rat thence North 47°4731"Mat 512.02 feed; thence 4508 feel on fine arc r e curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 far, a central angle N 26'24'W', and a lag chord whHr bears Norm 34.3527'West, 4567 we Menw Nor 21°23'24'Wczt. 28.22 feet; thence Bar 80'3038'Mat 166.53%ec; thence 8.02%eit on the arc of a verve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feat central angle of 04'363T, and a long choml wT[h bean South 66'18W"Want 8.02 feet; thence North 47.4731"Nan, 15016 fact; thence Nosh 43°001 H'East, 2167 lead; gAO� ExssB'pG thence North 68`36'36"East 694.84 feet; `yd thence South 46°02'3T East 379.56 faet •r ^9i ihenw Bou1M1 64°9021"Foci, 81.51 lead; noosr4 Oa 1ePrya yM MOCAN� Page 1 of 2 there NONM1 OP23'W'WaeA 3048 feel to the 58W weal corner aKea9 SUMMeion as filled In Both 119 M Plate al Pathan 18374 throt.018379, hoori of Me County. Idaho; thence on the awM CouNary Ise mold l(eeP SUWlvplon the following e9ht (8) wuBes and!distances: South 84°40'1O' Eau, 66,24hu', South 79W09' Eatl. 55.W feat, North 82°37'30" Easb 39.29 het; NOM 71.274T East 4147 feet; North W°4 02' East, W,W fast; NOM W°W42' East, 252.W feet', NOM 85-M IB' Eau, W.03 feat', North 67°0539' East 125.97 feel to the noMemt caner of De" SUMMapn afllhd In Book 108 of Field at Pages 15160 and 15161, records of Me County. Idaho; Hence South W°13'2T'Weal, 1157.69 feet b the southwest comer of said Darr Sutaivwon tierce on the wish boundary Ilne of sand Derry SuhdiNagn and the eaatedy Irolongetion of BOWh WOWS East. M 45 feet to the MINT OF BEGINNING. Canteining 34.691 eves, mane or em End of DeacnPgon yaPf u,yo \cENB� L 3i C0O97F OF 1de Oi Yk MocPMd Page 2 of 2 Keep Suhdialrion 69 c , a L L L N6B �l� LB 2 L9 L12 (3 j L5 L6� L13 / 0 C3 iT� S681W36'W a2 168.53' J} m N42'IZ29-E h Sv 6(u[�vwn' 255.m 234.591 Acres C1/4 Si SA rJ� a Gomt of .� SFepW. Be9129 u� 76 N5 x 3�8261y N24gB36•W 601ap. Line Table Line Table mo Una BaarMp Length Lha Bwlnq LmgN 3m Ll $001247'W 250.04' L8 A9'33'0B E 55E0' p n _y a OOW9JE LgZOl� L2 N212324-W 20.2Z L9 N82'37 E 39.29' m�e — pF �',Lr MgtAdd L3 N42'Q31-W 1A.16. LIO NA'2TQE 411I' 6 L4 N43MOVE 21.57 L11 NMY45aeE 511 N LS 584'5921 E 64.51' L12 N8658'42E 252.30' 5cole: 1 -400 L6 NOCYYO6-W 30.48. L13 N8.598Y6% 600Y 0 100 200 400 800 L➢ $6a4610% 6524. 714 NWW394 125,97' Curve Table Wrn LmpOi Ra6iue pYte Chord Owning Chord Length Cl 169.79 303.02' 3225W N84CC'20"W 162.53- ECalumaia R6__ S '5.4 CR 46.05' 100.W 2874'02' N3415'27-W .5.6Y SB S9 C3 1 8.02' 1 100.00' 495ID" WBIS-47-W B.02 IDAHO E.niblt Drawing for _ R-8 Zone SURVEY -ne Reveille Rid a subeirlsion A j ne GROUP. LLC :Lv.�'f Is.«,p>z..�n.1e`F � .<4 & . �M112 artnnoi� cescripticn for R-152 ns Sepfemi 2023 A pace Oland located in the South 12 of the Northeast 114 and the North M 0 the Southeast 114 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 End. Boise Meridian, Me CauMy, land, more particularly derail Has follews'. Commencing st the 114 denier common to Sections 4 and 5, T.21 R.1 E., B.M., from wfiich the Section comer common to Sections 4, 5. 8 and 9. T2.N.. R.1.E, B Al bean South 00.12'47"Wnl 2653.27; thence an Me"at Munavy lire of and Section 5, South 00-1247"N4at, 708A5 feel;therGe leaving add east Wundary has Noah 74.OUM-Weal, 830 O3fort.thence North 731 N4et 406.38 feel to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Noah 73°20'28"West 161.92 feet thence North 89.18 A-Wen, 50OUu feet', Mence South 89°4834"Wert, 841.23 feet to the naNxouth ceMealne of red Section S thence an sad noMmuth acreages, North 00-N 58"East M2.88 had to are Confer 114 comer of said Section 5; thence continuing an mk north-aMh card ilia, NUM 00°01-14'East, 82062 fed; thence leaving said n0dh5outh tangerine, South 78°3003"East, 19166he( thence NMM1 43TY19-East, 66.Set feet; thence South 4]°4]'31" East, 150,16 fed; thence 8,02 had on the am d a cone l0 the light nmrq a raalus m luum fed, a central angle of M°35'3T, and a I" chord Rich bears goal 66147' East 8.02 feet; thence North U-W'36" East 16653 fed; therwe South 21-23241 East, 28M fed; thence 48.08 het on the arc d a curve W the 10 having a radlur of l oOW had, a central angle of �dt4N0 261 d 34-35'2]"East, 45.W Hard; which Were South Hg o thence SautM 4]°4]'31° East 51202 fed, (rO 97f aF gp l dYd MocAlyv'O Page 1 of 2 Vence 1W.79 leel on Ira arc of a curve to IM len nawno a radius m]W.W feet a central aM6 of MP253M', and a loy c6ad wfilM Eears BoM 6a°0020-Ewl. 161.60 feat; VNnce BauV 42.12'29"Wawa, 268.28 feel, IM1ance IiaWh O°4711-East, P0.17 feat to Me POINT OF BEOINNINO COntdinlryl 25278 acres, mad or less. 6M of Oescr I$ion 11779 a �M MCCPdd Page 2 of 2 y. tl t25.278 y.tmva�. Acres �/W hJi. �3y"w STS4 fo g soo � SB9'M'N'W e119' XB918'3B w b spy N, � '. Pdn\ ng hfhyyyX I Bginning h>9yy. W h NI" LARD \{',ENB Linv Tobly m ,n11'/'1(f linv nmXn9 Lwy1M1 � w Vim) I •l $ M3Zy' 13 a =' 3m 11 a xew Lez C 9fwo\Ol al @ 5)B'3p'03'E 191.B8' olI k yRpMi La xum'm'E ea.et h om u wro'att tsp.ts N Ls xBa'3Bae'E 1 Scaiv 1'=400' S31 D'39Y 3n3t ' 0 100 200 400 Boo Curve Tobie Cjw LMgth Rumu. za Chas neaxn9 cnaE Lm9N not' Ipopo' as'm• a m E cwoma Ne. _ BY 95A7 ss C3 100'20'E I07.5S IDAHO ® Exhibit Drawing for _ SURVEY R-15 Zone 3 Reveille Ridge Subdivieion A 1 xaq GROUP, LLC ao "n.v o ma nnyv B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 1/10/24)&Revised Phasing Plan(dated: 2/21/24) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION D: EE E 0 8fE JECT I I I ® I PLAN SHEET INDEX ® ® ® ® ® O SHEET DESCRIPTION BL 3 \_ PP-1 COVER SHEET.INDEX,VIGNf,Y IMP, NOTES II �� L� PPP-3-2 -PRELIMINARY PLAT WEST WYGIIT I IN P Vp Ear Bt of B A -PRELIMI EAST tour PPS - RCEL C TABLES EXIS,ING TOPOGRAPHY -- — --� ® I` PP-] -ENGINEERING PI Nr&STREET SEGTIONT 4 rt PP-8 -PRELIMINARY SEWER PROFlLES PRELIMINARY'SEWER PROFlLES ® ® ® ® ® m ®®OQ ® i _ v � cp I .°� -jr —�`- z — — a —-—-—- D — —— — I � ma 4 � - _- 0 (i _ - Q W J IFSLQ - .tea -_- ® Ld d L PR6LRQ.YAPY PLAT F06 3i 1RHYSQIE E[UGC SIiHOMSIm Y✓, 1 A _ 4 M F. w F1zu _ Q p Y 'II a S C - I a - 0 fi 0 It _ PREUMINARY PLAT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE EIIEDIVISION a+ BLOCK 2 NBLO K r5 .®. ... .... e�. .o. _— • _.. " W BL b I _ nv .mmY.0 �ry = ___ m•�l(fiE_G[L�—. ..m cl� & 0 OCK�7 o Z Q LaC71- 22, rA e ff \ o © A� 0 Z r® _. m o a s s j Z o > Ld PP-3 PHASE MAP FOR 6 REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION 53! it IH- y w..�u W. s ill �= e o E a n W � o > pW I„IIll�d 90.0 0 nWrc C. Landscape Plan(dated: 12/12/2023) 1 4 t. rk ® m m t 1 ®� r O ® m wa2ys. .r 13 IENSENBQTB REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION Ov FEBRUARY 12,2024 PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN, ID Iwo« IV �� t'- C� -!¢.,�.���/rJ�*�`� •R�,N�� _______MATCHLINE L21-•. ______________i �{ UY Ci Mix .-L:". ill_ h .�« �J� •OIU - 7 \ I � N - � n o ] W PLANT PALETTE a NOTE5 ' M�L:rriv�,m"F=iw � p • �� '.©;. .... .w.r.«......r.r..� ....,..,i... a � W _ L Y Z W rI•u. "' ill o.� �- rr-n "li Vim. > J aQ 1� L1 �c v s+ w � t w I ;ley. MAT_GML E LE J "TCHUNE Li------ , - > F U 0 J n m W O ] 5 PLA L NT PAETTE Z n _ W j a � > ri z u r m o M....�.. a PLANT PALETTE ! �� •�"..��,.,�. a �I mix a zIz &'GLE CALL d U Z NOTES > G o• w a N a L MATCHLME LS __:Y ° > I MATClLME L4 — w U � J } Z J U 7 W J JENSE MLa W w p �as p F 1 Iq 11� � c a�� PLANT PALETTE e �°c ®R[I E L6 a. O mee L 051 IQ o TA-= t- 4 ti m Z NOTES g • .. � m w J w 0 J m a � w rc rew � w p JENSE BELTS - d w ll ll � C L/t fi el PLANT PALETTE X na� ry VI—PRIVACY FENCE Oj —E—NTIN&/S—N& IRON FENCE 0 z LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS 'Im, u W z z V) L 0 DEVELOPMENT t:IA7A > O —N—GUT 0 L LA D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: 12/10/2023) OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION 8€ � ® CDr ---—— -- ®� f LY jL 0 ®®® � E n 2z — - ® X p Z a 0 o 7 w a w o 0 � p�OS E. Conceptual Building 1 detached: mat i ii I I jai .:.rrT On , i - . fi 7 attached: a: ' k 4� } L f - 4 � r F �• l k Front-loaded II . ti f -411 74 P- MEP SL • � t ' t ti + I I ■ ._ 1 a r Alley-loaded townhomes: 0 � _ e � F F. Common Driveway Exhibit 4� O� 2 r r r , r P ; 0, r � .a, `\ .. �.. %r 1511l � 1 rr 3,200 iP _ ♦ f 2,500 sf 3,200 sf r � r 1.602 sf �� r r . • 55�Q, .` 3.200 sf 0 r � 1 ti 2. REVEILLE RIDGE PRELIMINARY SHARED-ACCESS EXHIBIT LOT 51 BLOCK 16 FOR LOTS 52 53 & 54 BLOCK 16 alley Engineering, Inc. 20 0 10 20 40 CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CADD 1119 E.STATE STREET,SUITE 210 TEL 208-93MO13 SCALE IN FEET EAGLE,ID 83616 www.6aileyengineers.com 1'=20' G. Product Type Exhibit Map PRODUCT EXHIBIT MAP FOR REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION eow � o R-8 ZONE " 34.691 AC 124— STIR GROSS DENSITYo,.,,,� 124/34.691-3.57 I 6 II III, d Z U 0 Z E Lf 0 W N a w 0 R-15 ZONE X 25.278 AC — — 1 ❑ > 62— TOWNHOME — — — ;+�„ __ H w 46— STIR 14— DUETS GROSS DENSITY J 122/25.278-4,83 mm.� .�mm,a,_,m•,., —1-- --- ---��—I: 0 O W wo 011 IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision& Order for the annexation request. A final plat application will not be accepted until the property is annexed(i.e. the ordinance and development agreement are recorded). The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall generally comply with the development plans submitted with this application, included in Section VIII, and the provisions contained herein. b. A 10-foot wide detached sidewalk/multi-use pathway shall be provided within the required street buffers along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site(i.e. S. Eagle Rd.,E. Vantage Pointe and St L). c. The rear and/or sides of homes on lots that face collector(E.Vantage Pointe& St L)and arterial (S. Eagle Rd.) streets shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Depict a minimum 20-foot wide street buffer in a dedicated buffer easement on lots adjacent to E. Vantage Pointe and St L,collector streets,labeled accordingly. b. Depict the future curb location as anticipated by ACHD along S. Eagle Rd.; and a minimum 25- foot wide street buffer,measured from the ultimate curb location. c. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/multi-use pathways within the required street buffers along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site(i.e. S. Eagle Rd.,E. Vantage Pointe and St L). d. Depict zero(0)setbacks on lot lines where townhomes are proposed to span across where no easements will exist. e. Graphically depict and label the 30-foot wide easement for the Farr Lateral,measured from the centerline of the lateral, located on Lot 17,Block 2. £ Perpetual ingress/egress shall be required either by a recorded easement or as a note on a recorded final plat. The easement or plat note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C- 3D.8. g. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site(i.e. S. Eagle Rd., E. Vantage Pointe and St L). Parkways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. h. Graphically depict the 75-foot wide easement for the Williams Pipeline. i. Depict a 10-foot wide sidewalk along one side of Taps to between the Williams pipeline pathway and the Farr Lateral pathway. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Depict a minimum 20-foot wide street buffer in a dedicated buffer easement on lots adjacent to E. Vantage Pointe and St L,collector streets,labeled accordingly. b. Depict the future curb location as anticipated by ACHD along S. Eagle Rd.; depict a minimum 25-foot wide street buffer,measured from the ultimate curb location. c. Depict landscaping with a mix of materials within the street buffers along S. Eagle Rd.,E. Vantage Pointe and St L,in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3; include calculations that demonstrate compliance. d. Include mitigation information for all existing trees being removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-IOC.5. e. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/multi-use pathways within the required street buffers along all collector and arterial streets within and adjacent to the site(i.e. S. Eagle Rd.,E. Vantage Pointe and St L). f. Depict landscaping with a mix of materials along each side of all pathways, in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C.Note:Alternative compliance may be requested for the trees along the pathway in the Williams pipeline easement as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5. g. Change the fencing type along the northern boundary on the western portion of the site adjacent to the common open space with a pathway in Vertex Subdivision to 5-foot tall wrought iron fencing in accord with UDC 11-3A-7A.7b. h. Extend the 10-foot wide multi-use pathway to the south through Lot 1,Block 14 for future extension to the south. i. Extend the 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Farr Lateral in Lot 16,Block 2 (in the vicinity of Lot 6, Block 2)to the northwest to connect to the multi-use pathway in Vertex Subdivision to the north. j. Include a detail for the picnic areas on Lot 1,Block 16 that includes tables,benches, landscaping and a structure for shade to demonstrate compliance with UDC 11-3G-4C.5. k. Depict a 10-foot wide sidewalk along one side of Taps to between the Williams pipeline pathway and the Farr Lateral pathway. 1. Depict fencing along Lot 51,Block 16 to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A.7a. in. Depict a 5-foot wide landscape buffer planted with shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover along the southwest side of the common driveway on Lot 51,Block 16 in accord with UDC II- 6C-3D.5. n. Depict details for the picnic area,tot lot,bike repair station and fitness course amenities that demonstrate compliance with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-3G-4C, D, E and F. 4. All irrigation ditches,laterals, sloughs or canals, , crossing this site shall be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.3,Bless except for the Farr Lateral•awed by City r,,, nei . TheA„p'ea nt requests.appreval era fiWm Council approved the Applicant's request for a waiver to leave the Farr lateral open. 5. All existing structures shall be removed from the site prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 6. Comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3. 7. Submit a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway within the Williams Pipeline easement and along the Farr Lateral,as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.G below. 8. Comply with the Williams Developer's Handbook for any development and/or improvements within the Williams pipeline easement. 9. The open water pond on Lot 1, Block 16 shall have recirculated water and be maintained such that it does not become a mosquito breeding ground as set forth in UDC H-3G-3B.6. 10. Future development of Lots 52-54,Block 16 shall be consistent with the common driveway exhibit included in Section VIII.F and the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. 11. Modify the phasing plan to switeh Phases 2 ^^a 3. Future development shall comply with the modified phasing plan in Section VII.B. 12. An administrative design review application shall be submitted for the single-family attached and townhome structures to ensure compliance with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 13. Future development shall substantially comply with the product type exhibit in Section VIII.G. 14. Approval of a preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat. Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period,the director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title. B. PUBLIC WORKS https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=330721&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit E C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=330723&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity D. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=331450&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity&cr =1 E. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES(ACDS) https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=331625&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU F. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=331878&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity G. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=333344&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU H. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=333138&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity I. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) Itggs://weblink.meridianciN.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=337083&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX J. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridianciN.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=334422&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU&cr =1 K. KUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT https://web link.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=345996&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City&cr =1 X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's request to annex the subject property with R-8 and R-1 S zoning and develop with a mix ofsingle family attached, single-family detached and townhome dwellings on the site at the densities proposed is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan per the analysis in Section V. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to the R-8 and R-1 S zoning districts and development with a mix of housing types generally complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future single-family residential homes/uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. Comments were netreceived from WASD an this applieatiaen and Kuna School District(see Section IX above. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision- making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the UDC and generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY LOSS MINISTRY, INC. FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS This RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY LOSS MINISTRY, INC. FOR FY?4 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS ("Agreement") is entered into this_ June 18th, 2024 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") City, and David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc., a nonprofit organization organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Recipient"). WHEREAS, Meridian City Council has allocated fiscal year 2024 general funds for the purpose of awarding Neighborhood Grants to Meridian 17esidents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community, as set forth in detail in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS,Recipient has proposed to install a pregnancy and infant loss memorial to be installed at the Meridian Cemetery and promote such installation, which activity complements the objectives of the Neighborhood Grant program; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement, City and Recipient wish to establish the roles and responsibilities of the Recipient related to the investment and utilization of fiscal year 2024 Neighborhood Grant funds provided to Recipient by City ("Funds"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. RECIPIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES;PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. A. Activities. Recipient shall use the Funds, in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), to Recipient for the installation of a pregnancy and infant loss memorial to be installed at the Meridian Cemetery and the promotion of such installation ("Project"), as set forth in Exhibit B. Recipient shall use the Funds only toward completion of the Project. Recipient's use of the Funds shall be consistent with any and all terms and conditions of the Neighborhood Grant Program and this Agreement. B. Time of performance. Services of Recipient shall start the Project on or before June 1, 2024 and shall complete the Project by August 30, 2024. C. Budget. Recipient shall use the Funds to complete the Project in accordance with the budget set forth in Exhibit B. All Funds unused as of August 30, 2024 shall be returned to the City. D. Closeout. By September 6, 2024, Recipient shall submit a final report to City. The final report shall include: 1. Written narrative answering each and all of the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? RECIPIENT AGREEMENT w1TH DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY Loss MINISTRY FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE I OF 5 b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? 2. Final project budget, showing use of Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in-kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting final project budget. 4. Photographs of Project completion and final Project. 5. Check payable to City of Meridian for any unused funds. E. Draw requests. Funds for Project will be available following execution of this Agreement and City's receipt of Recipient's completed W-9 form. To obtain Funds, Recipient shall submit a written draw request to the Grant Administrator. Each draw request may be for up to $5,000 of the Funds allocated for Project. Upon the Grant Administrator's verification of progress toward Project goals and/or completion; review of quotes, receipts, and other required documentation; and site visit(s), as appropriate, the Grant Administrator will forward to the City Finance Department a request that the City remit a check to Recipient in the requested amount. F. Performance monitoring. City's Grant Administrator shall monitor Recipient's investment of the Funds to ensure that Recipient is working toward meet the goals of the Project as set forth in Exhibit B. Performance monitoring shall include review of quotes, receipts, and other documents, as well as site visits, as appropriate. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. No agency; independent contractor. It is understood and agreed the Recipient is not, and shall not be considered, an agent of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in Recipient's use of the Funds. In all matters pertaining to this Agreement, Recipient shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither Recipient nor any volunteer,employee, invitee, or agent of Recipient shall be deemed an employee of City. Recipient shall have no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in City. B. Photographs. Recipient consents to City's publication and/or use of any photographs or recordings of Recipient; Recipient's volunteers, guests, invitees, agents, and employees; and/or the Project for educational and promotional purposes. C. Acknowledgment of risk. Recipient acknowledges that activity undertaken in conjunction with this Agreement presents risks, some of which are unknown, and agrees to assume all such risks. D. Indemnification; waiver. Recipient shall indemnify, save and hold harmless, release and forever discharge City and its agents and employees from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Recipient or City in the course of any activity associated with this Agreement not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City, regardless of the manner by which such claim may be brought. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY Loss MINISTRY FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 2 OF 5 E. Notices. Day-to-day communications between Recipient and the Grant Administrator shall occur by email or phone, as appropriate. All other notices to be provided under this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows: If to Recipient: If to City: Randy Jackson City Clerk, City of Meridian David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. 33 East Broadway Avenue 417 Almond Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Nampa ID 83686 Notices shall be either personally delivered or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid. Notice shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit in the U.S. mail, or upon personal delivery to the party above specified. F. Content. In the course of working on and completing the Project, Recipient shall ensure that the Funds are not used for any purpose that promotes, endorses or furthers any message containing the following content: 1. Profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; 2. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; 3. Defamatory or personal attacks; 4. Threats to any person or organization; 5. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates conduct in violation of any law; 6. Content that encourages or incites illegal activity; 7. Content that may compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems; 8. Content that violates a known legal ownership interest of any party; or 9. Any content that contains or perpetuates a message that the Grant Administrator deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. If the City becomes aware that Funds are used in violation of this provision, City may deny future draw requests for Funds or request the return of Funds already released. G. Restrictions. Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. H. Default or breach; cure; termination. If Recipient is in breach or default of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement and fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within fourteen (14) days of written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights of Recipient in and to the Funds, at City's option, may be terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. I. No waiver. City's waiver on one or more occasion of any breach or default of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or a different term, covenant or condition, nor shall such waiver operate to prejudice, waive, or affect any right or remedy City may have under this Agreement with respect to such subsequent default or breach by Recipient. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT wITH DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY LOSS MINISTRY FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 3 OF 5 J. Nondiscrimination. Both Parties warrant and agree that there shall be no discrimination against any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, in the granting or expenditure of Funds or any activity associated with Project. K. Applicable law; non-appropriation. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3, of the Idaho Constitution and the Idaho Public Records Act. Recipient acknowledges that City is a governmental entity, and the validity of this Agreement is based upon the availability of public funding under the authority of its statutory mandate. Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, City's obligations under this Agreement are subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made by Meridian City Council for such purpose. L. Compliance with laws. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Recipient and each and all of Recipient's volunteers, employees, guests, invitees, and agents shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. M. State of Idaho requirements.The following provisions are required by the State of Idaho. The inclusion of these provisions in this Agreement does not indicate City's support or opposition to these provisions nor agreement by City that these clauses are relevant to the subject matter of this Agreement; these provisions are included solely to comply with the laws of the State of Idaho. 1. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2346, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under Israel's control. The terms "company" and "boycott Israel" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2346. 2. No Public Funds for Abortion Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 18-8703, as applicable, Recipient certifies that it is not, and will not for the duration of this Agreement become, an abortion provider or an affiliate of an abortion provider, as those terms are defined in the "No Public Funds for Abortion Act," Idaho Code §§ 18-8701 et seq. 3. Contract with company owned or operated by the government of China prohibited. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not a company currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not for the duration of this Agreement be owned or operated by the government of China. The terms "company" and "government of China" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2359. N. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. O. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY LOSS MINISTRY FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 4 OF 5 P. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements, agreements, or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. No verbal or written inducements to execute this Agreement have been made to Recipient. In entering into this Agreement, Recipient relies upon no statement, fact, promise or representation, whether express or implied, written or oral, not specifically set forth herein in writing. Q. Successors and assigns. All of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each party and their successors, assigns, legal representatives, heirs, executors, and administrators. R. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice. S. Warranty of authority. Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of such party and is a valid and binding obligation upon the persons or entity signing this Agreement. T. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. RECIPIENT: Randy on David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry, Inc. CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-18-2024 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH DAVID'S HOPE PREGNANCY Loss MINISTRY FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 5 OF 5 EXHIBIT A E IDIAN -- IDAHO 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Overview of Neighborhood Grant Program Meridian City Council has allocated $50,000 for Neighborhood Grants for 2024, to be awarded to Meridian residents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community. Applicants may apply for Neighborhood Grant funds in any amount up to $50,000 and request funds for more than one project. Projects must be completed by September 9, 2024. Timeline Application period open: October 2, 2023 Applications due: November 13, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Selection Panel Review Period opens: November 17, 2023 Selection panel Review period closes: December 8, 2023 Applicants Notified: December 15, 2023 Signed agreement due: January 15 2024 Project completion: September 9, 2024 Final report due: September 15, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Eligibility and Criteria Projects funded with Neighborhood Grant funds must be located on public property within the City of Meridian. Applicants must be residents of the City of Meridian or an organization operating within the City of Meridian. Upon selecting a project for funding, the City of Meridian will require the successful applicant to enter into a grant recipient agreement establishing terms and conditions of the grant funds (a sample agreement is available upon request). In awarding Neighborhood Grants, the selection panel will consider the following criteria: 1. Capacity for neighbor engagement in project implementation and final deliverable; 2. Contribution to the improvement of the neighborhood environment and sense of community; 3. Suitability of the proposed project for the project site; and 4. Long-term viability and impact of the proposed project. Application To apply, applicants must submit the following materials to the City Contact listed below. If applying for more than one grant, a separate application must be completed for each project. 1. Completed Grant Application form 2. Written narrative answering each of the following questions: a. What do you propose to accomplish and how? b. How do you plan to engage and use volunteers, specifically your neighbors, to help with the project? How many volunteers will be needed? c. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood, and how will you measure it? Neighborhood Grant Program Page 1 d. What is the plan for long-term maintenance of items that will be purchased, built, or installed with the funds (if applicable)? e. What is the priority of this project (if applying for grant funds for more than one project)? 3. Detailed project plan, including a timeline with specific dates. 4. Detailed project budget, listing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 5. If the project involves collaboration or co-funding with other organizations or businesses, a letter of support from each. City Contact Submit the application and reporting materials to, and direct any questions to: Jacob Cluff, Community Relations & Policy Advisor Address: 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Email: jcluff@meridiancity.org Phone: 208-489-0535 Report g Requirements All projects must be completed by Friday, September 9, 2024. A final report must be submitted to the City Contact by Thursday, September 15, 2024. The final report must include the following: 1. Written narrative answering the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? 2. Final project budget, showing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting the final project budget. 4. Photographs of project completion and the final project. 5. A check payable to the City of Meridian for any unused funds. Purchasing Requirements If the proposed Project includes the purchase of goods, services, supplies, or equipment, purchases up to $15,000 will require one written quote, and purchases $15,001 to $50,000 require three written quotes. Documentation will be required prior to release of funds. Limitations Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. Funds will not be awarded to support any project that in any way: violates law or City policy; or violates a legal ownership interest, such as a copyright, of any party. Funds may not be spent for any purpose or message that includes, promotes, or fosters: profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; defamatory or personal attacks; threats to Neighborhood Grant Program Page 2 any person or organization; information that may compromise public safety; or any purpose or message that the City deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. Additional limitations may apply. Neighborhood Grant Program Page 3 � E IDIarI=- 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Application Form EXHIBIT B Applicant Information Applicant name:" Organization(if applicable): Randy Jackson David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry Applicant's parent name(if Applicant is under 18): Phone Number: E-mail:* 208-514-5962 randy@davidshopeministry.org Mailing Address:* 417 Almond St Nampa,ID 83686 Project Information Project Name:* Pregnancy and Infant Loss Memorial Project Type:* Amenity(e.g., neighborhood garden, bike rack, bike repair station,dog waste bag station) Beautification(e.g.signage, banners, trees,landscaping,art) Clean up(e.g. graffiti removal,overgrown vegetation removal,litter removal) Other Community awareness and support Project Address/Location: 895 E Franklin Rd Meridian,ID 83642 Property owner: Meridian Cemetery Acknowledgments I, * Randy Jackson hereby acknowledge the following stipulations and agree that if this proposal is selected for funding under the Neighborhood Grant Program, such funding shall occur subject to these general terms and conditions,as well as subject to other specific terms and conditions that shall be set forth in a separate, written grant recipient agreement between myself and the City of Meridian. I specifically acknowledge that: Before my Project is funded,I(or my parent/guardian)will be required to enter into a written agreement with the City R) establishing the specific terms and conditions of the grant funds provided. * If this Project is selected for funding,neither the City of Meridian nor its officers or employees will assume liability for any loss or RJ damage.This Project may involve risks,some of which are unknown. The procurement of any necessary insurance will be my sole responsibility.The City will not provide insurance or other coverage RJ of any kind for loss,theft,or damage that I or anyone associated with the Project may or does incur. The City has made no offer or commitment to issue Neighborhood Grant funds;the City shall have no obligation to do so except RJ by,and pursuant to,written agreement. 1 acknowledge,understand,and agree to these general terms and conditions. Signature Print name: RandyJackson Parent signature(If applicant is under 18): Date: 2023-11-10 Application online forms will be available at www.meridiancity.org/neighborhoodgrants Review the Grant Application Guidelines for further clarification. Project Information If you are submitting more than one grant application,you must rank them in priority order. This grant application is ranked#: Out of: applications. Project Name: Pregnancy and Infant Loss Memorial If Applicable-Project Address/Location 895 E Franklin Rd Meridian,ID 83642 If Applicable -Who owns this property?: Meridian Cemetery Project Dates(estimated): Start: Completion: 2024-03-04 2024-10-01 Project Type: Beautification/Clean Up Park improvement Gardening/Vacant Lot Repurposing Signage/Banners/Sign Toppers Tree Replacement/Planting Dog Waste Station Bike Infrastructure Events and Community Engagement Other Community awareness and support Describe the project.(What are you going to do?): The Pregnancy and Infant Loss Memorial Project is a simple project that will put a memorial stone and benches for reflection. The purpose is to bring awareness to the tragedy of pregnancy and infant loss,and to provide support and comfort for the many families coping with this type of loss. Meridian Cemetery has already been contacted,and have a lovely location where a memorial stone and a bench could be placed for families to have a place for reflection. David's Hope has previously worked with the cities of Nampa and Caldwell to establish similar memorials; included in this application is pictures from the Nampa memorial at Kohlerlawn Cemetery. Please include pictures of the impact area (if applicable): memboxl4.jpg 104.86KB memoriall.jpg 107.33KB memorial2.jpg 107.75KB How do you plan to gain/use volunteers, specifically your neighbors,to help on the project? (Provide Specific Numbers): By asking some of our past members and board members to help. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood, and how will you measure it? The desired impact is simply to create a place where families can go for grieving or reflection, in coping with the loss of a baby. Who will assume responsibility for maintaining the finished project or storing equipment(if applicable): If the cemetery is unable,we will provide volunteers. Detailed Project plan, including timeline with specific dates: We would begin the project in spring of 2024, hopefully by March. Leading up to that time,we would cordinate with Meridian city leaders and Meridian residents as to what exactly the monument will look like and design in collaboration with them. With the help of the cemetery any ground work could begin to prepare the area in spring. The memorial stone and bench would be ordered at that time,and all should be able to be completed and in place in time for the beginning of October 2024-which is Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month. If you are collaborating with other civic organizations/businesses on this project,you must provide their names and attach a letter of support from all: Partner Organization(s)Name,addresses,phone number and email: Is this grant part of an ongoing or larger project? If yes, please explain: No. Project Budget Please include professional services,supplies/materials,printing/copying,permits,etc. *Donations/sponsorships are highly encouraged and will be considered favorably by the granting committee. Items Needed Donated AmountNalue Cost to Purchase 1. $ $ Memorial Stone 2. $ Bench 3. $ Bench 1000 4. $ $ Promotional 1000 5. $ $ Labor,delivery and other cost(if necessary) 4500 6. $ $ 7. $ $ 8. $ $ 9. $ $ 10. $ $ TOTALS (Total "cost to purchase" should equal your grant request total) $10,000.00 Total Grant Amount Requested: $10,000.00 Funds Disbursement Make check payable to: David's Hope Pregnancy Loss Ministry Civic Organizations: Applicant is serving as their own fiduciary' The following organization will serve as our fiduciary *A Fiduciary is a group responsible for the protect who will receive the check,cash it,and expend the funds Authorized Agent's Name: Randy Jackson Signature Date Time 2023-1 1-10 �a. oc e (-)/?'-Alegi Responsible Party Primary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail: Randy Jackson 208-514-5962 randy@davidshopeministry.org 1, Randy Jackson if awarded the above project,will: • Keep all receipts • Complete the proposed project by Friday,September 6,2024 • File Grant Report(with receipts)by Friday,September 15,2024 • Pictures of the complete project/event are highly encouraged to be sent by email tojcluff@meridiancity.org Signature: Date: 2023-11-10 rtfl) 0Wq ()76k eff Secondary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail Lenette Jackson 208-899-3676 lenette@davidshopeministry.org E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian Library District Foundation, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION, INC. FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS This RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION, INC. FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS ("Agreement") is entered into this 18th day of June , 2024 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") City, and Meridian Library District Foundation, Inc. a nonprofit organization organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Recipient"). WHEREAS,Meridian City Council has allocated fiscal year 2024 general funds for the purpose of awarding Neighborhood Grants to Meridian residents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community, as set forth in detail in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Recipient has proposed to purchase new children's books for the Meridian Library location at Orchard Park, which activity complements the objectives of the Neighborhood Grant program; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement, City and Recipient wish to establish the roles and responsibilities of the Recipient related to the investment and utilization of fiscal year 2024 Neighborhood Grant funds provided to Recipient by City ("Funds"); NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. RECIPIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES;PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. A. Activities. Recipient shall use the Funds, in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), to Recipient for the purchase of new children's books for the Meridian Library location at Orchard Park ("Project"), as set forth in Exhibit B. Recipient shall use the Funds only toward completion of the Project. Recipient's use of the Funds shall be consistent with any and all terms and conditions of the Neighborhood Grant Program and this Agreement. B. Time of performance. Services of Recipient shall start the Project on or before June 1, 2024 and shall complete the Project by August 30, 2024. C. Budget. Recipient shall use the Funds to complete the Project in accordance with the budget set forth in Exhibit B. All Funds unused as of August 30, 2024 shall be returned to the City. D. Closeout. By September 6, 2024, Recipient shall submit a final report to City. The final report shall include: 1. Written narrative answering each and all of the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 1 OF 5 b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? 2. Final project budget, showing use of Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in-kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting final project budget. 4. Photographs of Project completion and final Project. 5. Check payable to City of Meridian for any unused funds. E. Draw requests. Funds for Project will be available following execution of this Agreement and City's receipt of Recipient's completed W-9 form. To obtain Funds, Recipient shall submit a written draw request to the Grant Administrator. Each draw request may be for up to $5,000 of the Funds allocated for Project. Upon the Grant Administrator's verification of progress toward Project goals and/or completion; review of quotes, receipts, and other required documentation; and site visit(s), as appropriate, the Grant Administrator will forward to the City Finance Department a request that the City remit a check to Recipient in the requested amount. F. Performance monitoring. City's Grant Administrator shall monitor Recipient's investment of the Funds to ensure that Recipient is working toward meet the goals of the Project as set forth in Exhibit B. Performance monitoring shall include review of quotes, receipts, and other documents, as well as site visits, as appropriate. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. No agency; independent contractor. It is understood and agreed the Recipient is not, and shall not be considered, an agent of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in Recipient's use of the Funds. In all matters pertaining to this Agreement, Recipient shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither Recipient nor any volunteer, employee, invitee, or agent of Recipient shall be deemed an employee of City. Recipient shall have no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in City. B. Photographs. Recipient consents to City's publication and/or use of any photographs or recordings of Recipient; Recipient's volunteers, guests, invitees, agents, and employees; and/or the Project for educational and promotional purposes. C. Acknowledgment of risk. Recipient acknowledges that activity undertaken in conjunction with this Agreement presents risks, some of which are unknown, and agrees to assume all such risks. D. Indemnification; waiver. Recipient shall indemnify, save and hold harmless, release and forever discharge City and its agents and employees from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Recipient or City in the course of any activity associated with this Agreement not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City, regardless of the manner by which such claim may be brought. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 2 OF 5 E. Notices. Day-to-day communications between Recipient and the Grant Administrator shall occur by email or phone, as appropriate. All other notices to be provided under this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows: If to Recipient: If to City: Meridian Library District Foundation, Inc. City Clerk, City of Meridian Attn: Eryn Turner 33 East Broadway Avenue 1326 W. Cherry Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian ID 83642 Notices shall be either personally delivered or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid. Notice shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit in the U.S. mail, or upon personal delivery to the party above specified. F. Content. In the course of working on and completing the Project, Recipient shall ensure that the Funds are not used for any purpose that promotes, endorses or furthers any message containing the following content: 1. Profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; 2. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; 3. Defamatory or personal attacks; 4. Threats to any person or organization; 5. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates conduct in violation of any law; 6. Content that encourages or incites illegal activity; 7. Content that may compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems; 8. Content that violates a known legal ownership interest of any party; or 9. Any content that contains or perpetuates a message that the Grant Administrator deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. If the City becomes aware that Funds are used in violation of this provision, City may deny future draw requests for Funds or request the return of Funds already released. G. Restrictions. Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. H. Default or breach; cure; termination. If Recipient is in breach or default of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement and fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within fourteen (14) days of written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights of Recipient in and to the Funds, at City's option, may be terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. I. No waiver. City's waiver on one or more occasion of any breach or default of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or a different term, covenant or condition, nor shall such waiver operate to prejudice, waive, or affect any right or remedy City may have under this Agreement with respect to such subsequent default or breach by Recipient. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 3 OF 5 J. Nondiscrimination. Both Parties warrant and agree that there shall be no discrimination against any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, in the granting or expenditure of Funds or any activity associated with Project. K. Applicable law; non-appropriation. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3, of the Idaho Constitution and the Idaho Public Records Act. Recipient acknowledges that City is a governmental entity, and the validity of this Agreement is based upon the availability of public funding under the authority of its statutory mandate. Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, City's obligations under this Agreement are subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made by Meridian City Council for such purpose. L. Compliance with laws. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Recipient and each and all of Recipient's volunteers, employees, guests, invitees, and agents shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. M. State of Idaho requirements. The following provisions are required by the State of Idaho. The inclusion of these provisions in this Agreement does not indicate City's support or opposition to these provisions nor agreement by City that these clauses are relevant to the subject matter of this Agreement; these provisions are included solely to comply with the laws of the State of Idaho. 1. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2346, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under Israel's control. The terms "company" and "boycott Israel" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2346. 2. No Public Funds for Abortion Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 18-8703, as applicable, Recipient certifies that it is not, and will not for the duration of this Agreement become, an abortion provider or an affiliate of an abortion provider, as those terms are defined in the"No Public Funds for Abortion Act," Idaho Code §§ 18-8701 et seq. 3. Contract with company owned or operated by the government of China prohibited. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not a company currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not for the duration of this Agreement be owned or operated by the government of China. The terms "company" and"government of China" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2359. N. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 4 OF 5 O. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. P. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements, agreements, or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. No verbal or written inducements to execute this Agreement have been made to Recipient. In entering into this Agreement, Recipient relies upon no statement, fact, promise or representation, whether express or implied, written or oral, not specifically set forth herein in writing. Q. Successors and assigns. All of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each party and their successors, assigns, legal representatives, heirs, executors, and administrators. R. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice. S. Warranty of authority. Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of such party and is a valid and binding obligation upon the persons or entity signing this Agreement. T. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. RECIPIENT: u r Meridian ibrary District Foundation, Inc. CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-18-2024 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 5 OF 5 EXHIBIT A C� fE IDIAN�--- 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Overview of Neighborhood Grant Program Meridian City Council has allocated $50,000 for Neighborhood Grants for 2024, to be awarded to Meridian residents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community. Applicants may apply for Neighborhood Grant funds in any amount up to $50,000 and request funds for more than one project. Projects must be completed by September 9, 2024. Timeline Application period open: October 2, 2023 Applications due: November 13, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Selection Panel Review Period opens: November 17, 2023 Selection panel Review period closes: December 8, 2023 Applicants Notified: December 15, 2023 Signed agreement due: January 15 2024 Project completion: September 9, 2024 Final report due: September 15, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Eligibility and Criteria Projects funded with Neighborhood Grant funds must be located on public property within the City of Meridian. Applicants must be residents of the City of Meridian or an organization operating within the City of Meridian. Upon selecting a project for funding, the City of Meridian will require the successful applicant to enter into a grant recipient agreement establishing terms and conditions of the grant funds (a sample agreement is available upon request). In awarding Neighborhood Grants, the selection panel will consider the following criteria: 1. Capacity for neighbor engagement in project implementation and final deliverable; 2. Contribution to the improvement of the neighborhood environment and sense of community; 3. Suitability of the proposed project for the project site; and 4. Long-term viability and impact of the proposed project. Application To apply, applicants must submit the following materials to the City Contact listed below. If applying for more than one grant, a separate application must be completed for each project. 1. Completed Grant Application form 2. Written narrative answering each of the following questions: a. What do you propose to accomplish and how? b. How do you plan to engage and use volunteers, specifically your neighbors, to help with the project? How many volunteers will be needed? c. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood, and how will you measure it? Neighborhood Grant Program Page 1 d. What is the plan for long-term maintenance of items that will be purchased, built, or installed with the funds (if applicable)? e. What is the priority of this project (if applying for grant funds for more than one project)? 3. Detailed project plan, including a timeline with specific dates. 4. Detailed project budget, listing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 5. If the project involves collaboration or co-funding with other organizations or businesses, a letter of support from each. City Contact Submit the application and reporting materials to, and direct any questions to: Jacob Cluff, Community Relations & Policy Advisor Address: 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Email:jcluff@meridiancity.org Phone: 208-489-0535 Reporting Requirements All projects must be completed by Friday, September 9, 2024. A final report must be submitted to the City Contact by Thursday, September 15, 2024. The final report must include the following: 1. Written narrative answering the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? 2. Final project budget, showing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting the final project budget. 4. Photographs of project completion and the final project. 5. A check payable to the City of Meridian for any unused funds. Purchasing Requirements If the proposed Project includes the purchase of goods, services, supplies, or equipment, purchases up to $15,000 will require one written quote, and purchases $15,001 to $50,000 require three written quotes. Documentation will be required prior to release of funds. Limitations Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. Funds will not be awarded to support any project that in any way: violates law or City policy; or violates a legal ownership interest, such as a copyright, of any party. Funds may not be spent for any purpose or message that includes, promotes, or fosters: profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; defamatory or personal attacks; threats to Neighborhood Grant Program Page 2 any person or organization; information that may compromise public safety; or any purpose or message that the City deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. Additional limitations may apply. Neighborhood Grant Program Page 3 C-z( E r� I y 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Application Form EXHIBIT B Applicant Information Applicant name:* Organization(if applicable): Eryn Turner Meridian Library Foundation Applicant's parent name(if Applicant is under 18): Phone Number:* E-mail: 208-871-9321 eryn@supportmld.org Mailing Address:* Meridian Library Foundation Attn:Eryn Turner 1326 W Cherry Lane Meridian,ID 83642 Project Information Project Name:* New Children's Books for Orchard Park Project Type:* Amenity(e.g.,neighborhood garden,bike rack,bike repair station,dog waste bag station) Beautification(e.g.signage,banners,trees,landscaping,art) Clean up(e.g.graffiti removal,overgrown vegetation removal,litter removal) Other Project Address/Location: Meridian Library at Orchard Park 1268 W Orchard Park Dr Meridian,ID 83646 Property owner: Meridian Library District Acknowledgments I Eryn Turner hereby acknowledge the following stipulations and agree that if this proposal is selected for funding under the Neighborhood Grant Program, such funding shall occur subject to these general terms and conditions,as well as subject to other specific terms and conditions that shall be set forth in a separate,written grant recipient agreement between myself and the City of Meridian. I specifically acknowledge that: * Before my Project is funded,I(or my parent/guardian)will be required to enter into a written agreement with the City et establishing the specific terms and conditions of the grant funds provided. Initial * If this Project is selected for funding,neither the City of Meridian nor its officers or employees will assume liability for any loss or et damage.This Project may involve risks,some of which are unknown. Initial * The procurement of any necessary insurance will be my sole responsibility.The City will not provide insurance or other coverage et of any kind for loss,theft,or damage that I or anyone associated with the Project may or does incur. Initial * The City has made no offer or commitment to issue Neighborhood Grant funds;the City shall have no obligation to do so except et by,and pursuant to,written agreement. Initial I acknowledge,understand,and agree to these general terms and conditions. Signature Print name: Eryn Turner Parent signature(If applicant is under 18): Date: 2023-11-13 Application online forms will be available at www.meridiancity.org/neighborhoodgrants Review the Grant Application Guidelines for further clarification. Project Information If you are submitting more than one grant application,you must rank them in priority order. This grant application is ranked#: 1 Out of: 1 applications. Project Name: New Children's Books for Orchard Park If Applicable-Project Address/Location Meridian Library at Orchard Park 1268 W Orchard Park Dr Meridian,ID 83646 If Applicable-Who owns this property?: Meridian Library District Project Dates(estimated): Start: Completion: 2024-01-01 2024-06-30 Project Type: Beautification/Clean Up Q Park improvement GardeningNacant Lot Repurposing Q Signage/Banners/Sign Toppers Tree Replacement/Planting O Dog Waste Station Bike Infrastructure O Events and Community Engagement Other amenity-new books Describe the project.(What are you going to do?): I am writing on behalf of the Meridian Library Foundation to request a grant of$10,000 from the City of Meridian's Neighborhood Grant Program to purchase new children's books for the new Meridian Library location at Orchard Park,located in North Meridian. The library has become a vibrant hub for young readers,and Orchard Park has seen an increase of 30%in children's book checkouts every month since opening in May.During October 15,272 children's books were borrowed from Orchard Park.The demand for picture books,early readers,and board books has been steadily rising each month,presenting a challenge in maintaining a comprehensive collection on the shelves for the community. A grant of$10,000 from the City of Meridian's Neighborhood Grant Program would significantly contribute to addressing this issue.The proposed funds will be allocated towards the purchase of approximately 1,100 to 1,300 new children's books.This infusion of fresh and exciting literature will not only meet the immediate needs of our young readers but also enhance the overall educational and recreational experience for the community. If awarded this grant,Meridian Library staff estimate that approximately 195-275 books($1800-2200)could be purchased and processed each month,with the total project taking an estimated six months to complete. Books that would be purchased include: Board Books-Designed for infants and toddlers and feature simple illustrations and basic concepts. Picture Books-Typically for ages 3-8,these books are richly illustrated with a focus on the interplay between text&images. Early Readers-Geared towards children who are learning to read with simple vocabulary,short sentences,and large font size.Early Readers often include repetition and predictable language. Chapter Books-Targeted at more advanced readers(ages 7-10)with short chapters with more complex plots and introduce young readers to longer narratives. By investing in our library's children's collection,we aim to foster a love for reading and learning among the children of Meridian.Your support will play a pivotal role in ensuring that the Orchard Park location continues to be a valuable resource for families,educators,and,most importantly,the children who frequent our library. The Meridian Library at Orchard Park is open 64 hours per week;this new location offers a convenient drive-up book return,as well as a 24-hour holds pickup,making it the most convenient location for our community to borrow and return library books.On average,this one location has over 12,000 visitors per month,a true testament that the Meridian Library brings our neighbors together;any improvements to the district are improvements for the entire community. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of our grant proposal and the positive impact it can have on the literacy and educational development of the youth in our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Eryn Turner,Foundation Executive Director Please include pictures of the impact area(if applicable): Compressed-City of Meridian Neighborhood Grant-Meridian Library Foundation Proposal.pdf 491.53KB How do you plan to gain/use volunteers,specifically your neighbors,to help on the project?(Provide Specific Numbers): One specific task where volunteers can play a crucial role is placing bookplates in the new children's books acquired through the grant.As part of this grant,the Foundation would purchase bookplates stating"This book purchased through a City of Meridian Neighborhood Grant",and have approximately 10 volunteers help us place those bookplates on the inside cover of the new books.As books are going to be consistently purchased throughout 5-6 months,we would create several dates/times for volunteers to assist us in this process. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood,and how will you measure it? The desired impact of this project on our neighborhood is threefold: Enhanced Literacy and Educational Opportunities:The infusion of new children's books will create a more dynamic collection of early readers, picture books,etc,that cater to the varied reading levels of our young patrons.This will contribute to improved literacy skills and provide valuable educational resources for children in the neighborhood. Community Engagement and Enrichment:A well-stocked and updated children's section will not only attract more young readers but also serve as a space for community engagement.We anticipate an increase in library visits,fostering a sense of community and providing families with a welcoming environment for shared learning and recreational activities. Long-Term Positive Impact on Youth Development:Exposure to a rich array of literature can have a lasting impact on the intellectual and emotional development of children.By expanding our children's book collection,we aim to contribute to the long-term positive development of the neighborhood's youth,nurturing a love for reading and learning that extends beyond their formative years. To measure the success of this project,we will employ the following key performance indicators: Library Attendance:Track the increase in the number of visitors to the Orchard Park Library,specifically focusing on the age group targeted by the new children's books. Book Checkout Rates:Monitor the borrowing rates of the newly acquired children's books to assess their popularity and relevance to the community's needs. Participation in Library Programs:Assess the participation rates in library programs and events designed for children,correlating any increases with the availability of new materials. Through these measures,we aim to quantifiably demonstrate the positive influence of the project on our neighborhood,fostering a thriving community that values education,literacy,and the joy of reading. Who will assume responsibility for maintaining the finished project or storing equipment(if applicable): The responsibility for maintaining the finished project,including the acquisition,processing,and management of the new children's book collection,will fall under the purview of the Meridian Library District. The Meridian Library Foundation has partnered with the District in previous projects and has already helped fund nearly$25,000 in new children's books earlier this year.This collaboration has been successful,as the District has the processes in place to assume responsibility for the collection. Detailed Project plan, including timeline with specific dates: January 8,2024-Foundation orders 1,200 bookplates(bookplates will be donated;grant funds will only be used to purchase children's books) January 2024-Library staff begin ordering&processing new children's books for Orchard Park,approximately 195-275 books($1800-2200) February thru June 2024-staff continue to purchase&process new children's books,exhausting the$10,000 grant March 2024-volunteer opportunity to place bookplates;optional tour of Orchard Park book processing for Meridian City Council June 2024-volunteer opportunity to place bookplates June 30,2024-all grant funds exhausted September 1,2024-compile statistics from January through August 2024,i.e.number of checkouts,program attendees at the Orchard Park location,as well as children's collection total each month for final reporting. If you are collaborating with other civic organ izationslbusinesses on this project,you must provide their names and attach a letter of support from all: Meridian Library District Support Letter for Foundation Neighborhood Grant Appliction.pdf 74.37KB Partner Organization(s)Name,addresses,phone number and email: Meridian Library District Attn:Nick Grove,Library Director 1326 W Cherry Lane Meridian,ID 83642 P:208-888-4451 E:director@mld.org Is this grant part of an ongoing or larger project?If yes,please explain: This grant application is part of a larger fundraising effort of the Meridian Library Foundation to raise funds for the children's collection of the Meridian Library District.Through previous grants and individual donations,the Foundation has been able to raise nearly$25,000 for new youth books.This fall/winter(2023)we are committed to raising an additional$25,000 through grants,events,fundraisers,and individual donations. Project Budget Please include professional services,supplies/materials,printing/copying,permits,etc. *Donations/sponsorships are highly encouraged and will be considered favorably by the granting committee. Items Needed Donated AmountNalue Cost to Purchase 1. $ $ 1,200 New Children's Books 10,000 2. $ $ 3. $ $ 4. $ $ 5. $ $ 6. $ $ 7. $ $ 8. $ $ 9. $ $ 10. $ $ TOTALS(Total"cost to purchase"should equal your grant request total) $10,000.00 Total Grant Amount Requested: $10,000.00 Funds Disbursement Make check payable to: Meridian Library Foundation Civic Organizations: Applicant is serving as their own fiduciary* The following organization will serve as our fiduciary *A Fiduciary is a group responsible for the project who will receive the check,cash it,and expend the funds Authorized Agent's Name: Eryn Turner Signature Date Time 2023-11-13 Responsible Party Primary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail: Eryn Turner 2088719321 eryn@supportmld.org 1, Eryn Turner if awarded the above project,will: • Keep all receipts • Complete the proposed project by Friday,September 6,2024 • File Grant Report(with receipts)by Friday,September 15,2024 • Pictures of the complete project/event are highly encouraged to be sent by email tojcluff@meridiancity.org Signature: Date: 2023-11-13 Secondary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail Brian Turner,Foundation Treasurer 208-371-6561 brian@brturner.com Meridian Library Foundation Grant Proposal City of Meridian Neighborhood Grant: New Children 's Books for the Meridian Library at Orchard Park MERIDIAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION The Meridian Library District's new Orchard Park location is conveniently located along the busy corridor at Chinden & Linder in North Meridian, and recently opened in May of 2023. 9 1 A DROP FIAT$Tl1GV CRLECrIW r.'x!F:1,_ri to. -♦• /-• • -• • ♦ • • DFF TONE -kT ST; I Wk."a ... FLE%W nG �r�r, aue+ Ns FAryATE TLVATE LOLLEa510N CfhCF OFFICE 9fOfp3E s IT val ACTIVE O1lD �aFT w[. Tye F naaLl EARLY VT KITS 1 CaNRM%Jii STAFF MG LOFDNGA ]TAPE iaDtg HW11 LNTERNLS nrTc*"n ��� '�5� uFmxlr Fra�N ���� Ea"A]I, ROCK STgG LT r a FWG PArU I 31OItA0E ErooK oNov BY THE NUMBERS: 1 ,w 9 number of children sprint books 5 5 �F'F in tho Orchard Park colloction 272 number of children s print books 15, borrowed from Orchard Park in OCT* .+ 'see graph below for number of bvrrowe troth month $609000 anticipated need for new children's books at Orchard Park for FY24 xY �. J 10,000 / 5.000 'ME MAY juNE jmv AUG sEPT OCT With this grant the library could purchase approximately 1,100-1,300 new children's books. Types of books we'll be able to fund. BOARD BOOKS 77 Des-' FFeatd for infants and i ure simple illustrations anld basic concepts. PICTURE BOOKS • • Typically for ages 3-8_ t ' • Richly illustrated with a focus on the interplay between text&images_ EARLY READERS • Geared towards children who are learning to read_ • Simple vocabulary,short sentences,and Fargo font size. • often include repetition and predictable language. CHAPTER BOOKS • Targeted at more advanced readers(ages 7-10). • Short chapters with more complex plots. • Introduce young readers to longer narratives. Meridian Library Foundation Neighborhood Grant Proposal 00 ,r If awarded this grant, Meridian Library staff estimate that approximately 195-275 books ($1800-2200) could be purchased and processed each month, with the total project taking an estimated six months to complete. J .r ®Uwe TM Meridian Library Foundation Neighborhood Grant Proposal • ' . This project would not be possible for the Foundation Q without the help of the City of Meridian's Neighborhood Grant Program.To recognize your generous gift,the CITY OF ' ' Foundation will place bookplates in each book •NEIGHBORHOOD- -• - • purchased with grant funds, and invite City Council to tour the processing space at the Orchard Park Library. Meridian Library Foundation Neighborhood Grant Proposal We thank the City of Meridian for considering our project! For more information, please contact Eryn Turner at eryn@supportmld.org MERIDIAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION Nick Grove meridian Library Director Meridian Library District library 1326 W Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 district director@mld.org r 11/13/2023 City of Meridian Neighborhood Grant Program 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Meridian City Council, I am writing to express my support for the grant proposal submitted by the Meridian Library Foundation seeking$10,000 from the City of Meridian's Neighborhood Grant Program.The funds are earmarked for the acquisition of new children's books for the Meridian Library at Orchard Park in North Meridian. The collaboration between the City of Meridian and the library for this project is a powerful testament to our shared commitment to fostering literacy and educational opportunities within the community. The Meridian Library Foundation's initiative aligns seamlessly with the city's vision for a well-educated and engaged community. As the Library Director at the Meridian Library District, I have observed the transformative impact that well-supported libraries can have on literacy rates, educational outcomes, and community cohesion. By investing in the Orchard Park Library's children's book collection, the City of Meridian has a unique opportunity to directly contribute to the enrichment and educational development of our youth. Thank you for considering this impactful collaboration between the City of Meridian and the Meridian Library Foundation. I am confident that this project will contribute significantly to the city's goals of fostering literacy, education, and bringing neighbors together through this community improvement. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Nick Grove Library Director Meridian Library District E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Recipient Agreement between the City of Meridan and the Meridian Senior Center for Fiscal Year 2024 Neighborhood Grant Funds RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS This RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS ("Agreement") is entered into this 1 8th day of June , 2024 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") City, and Meridian Area Senior Citizens Association, Inc., doing business as Meridian Senior Center, a nonprofit organization organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Recipient"). WHEREAS,Meridian City Council has allocated fiscal year 2024 general funds for the purpose of awarding Neighborhood Grants to Meridian residents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community, as set forth in detail in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS,Recipient has proposed to purchase patio seating for the Meridian Senior Center, which activity complements the objectives of the Neighborhood Grant program; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement, City and Recipient wish to establish the roles and responsibilities of the Recipient related to the investment and utilization of fiscal year 2024 Neighborhood Grant funds provided to Recipient by City ("Funds"); NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. RECIPIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES;PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. A. Activities. Recipient shall use the Funds, in the amount of ten thousand, thirty-nine dollars and ninety-seven cents ($10,039.97), to Recipient for the purchase of patio seating for the Meridian Senior Center("Project"), as set forth in Exhibit B. Recipient shall use the Funds only toward completion of the Project. Recipient's use of the Funds shall be consistent with any and all terms and conditions of the Neighborhood Grant Program and this Agreement. B. Time of performance. Services of Recipient shall start the Project on or before June 1, 2024 and shall complete the Project by August 30, 2024. C. Budget. Recipient shall use the Funds to complete the Project in accordance with the budget set forth in Exhibit B. All Funds unused as of August 30, 2024 shall be returned to the City. D. Closeout. By September 6, 2024, Recipient shall submit a final report to City. The final report shall include: 1. Written narrative answering each and all of the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 1 OF 5 2. Final project budget, showing use of Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in-kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting final project budget. 4. Photographs of Project completion and final Project. 5. Check payable to City of Meridian for any unused funds. E. Draw requests. Funds for Project will be available following execution of this Agreement and City's receipt of Recipient's completed W-9 form. To obtain Funds, Recipient shall submit a written draw request to the Grant Administrator. Each draw request may be for up to $5,000 of the Funds allocated for Project. Upon the Grant Administrator's verification of progress toward Project goals and/or completion; review of quotes, receipts, and other required documentation; and site visit(s), as appropriate, the Grant Administrator will forward to the City Finance Department a request that the City remit a check to Recipient in the requested amount. F. Performance monitoring. City's Grant Administrator shall monitor Recipient's investment of the Funds to ensure that Recipient is working toward meet the goals of the Project as set forth in Exhibit B. Performance monitoring shall include review of quotes, receipts, and other documents, as well as site visits, as appropriate. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. No agency; independent contractor. It is understood and agreed the Recipient is not, and shall not be considered, an agent of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in Recipient's use of the Funds. In all matters pertaining to this Agreement, Recipient shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither Recipient nor any volunteer, employee, invitee, or agent of Recipient shall be deemed an employee of City. Recipient shall have no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in City. B. Photographs. Recipient consents to City's publication and/or use of any photographs or recordings of Recipient; Recipient's volunteers, guests, invitees, agents, and employees; and/or the Project for educational and promotional purposes. C. Acknowledgment of risk. Recipient acknowledges that activity undertaken in conjunction with this Agreement presents risks, some of which are unknown, and agrees to assume all such risks. D. Indemnification; waiver. Recipient shall indemnify, save and hold harmless, release and forever discharge City and its agents and employees from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Recipient or City in the course of any activity associated with this Agreement not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City, regardless of the manner by which such claim may be brought. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 2 OF 5 E. Notices. Day-to-day communications between Recipient and the Grant Administrator shall occur by email or phone, as appropriate. All other notices to be provided under this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows: If to Recipient: If to City: Toni Allison City Clerk, City of Meridian Meridian Senior Center 33 East Broadway Avenue P.O. Box 563 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian ID 83680 Notices shall be either personally delivered or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid. Notice shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit in the U.S. mail, or upon personal delivery to the party above specified. F. Content. In the course of working on and completing the Project, Recipient shall ensure that the Funds are not used for any purpose that promotes, endorses or furthers any message containing the following content: 1. Profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; 2. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; 3. Defamatory or personal attacks; 4. Threats to any person or organization; 5. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates conduct in violation of any law; 6. Content that encourages or incites illegal activity; 7. Content that may compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems; 8. Content that violates a known legal ownership interest of any party; or 9. Any content that contains or perpetuates a message that the Grant Administrator deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. If the City becomes aware that Funds are used in violation of this provision, City may deny future draw requests for Funds or request the return of Funds already released. G. Restrictions. Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. H. Default or breach; cure; termination. If Recipient is in breach or default of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement and fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within fourteen (14) days of written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights of Recipient in and to the Funds, at City's option, may be terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. I. No waiver. City's waiver on one or more occasion of any breach or default of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or a different term, covenant or condition, nor shall such waiver operate to prejudice, waive, or affect any right or remedy City may have under this Agreement with respect to such subsequent default or breach by Recipient. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 3 OF 5 J. Nondiscrimination. Both Parties warrant and agree that there shall be no discrimination against any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, in the granting or expenditure of Funds or any activity associated with Project. K. Applicable law; non-appropriation. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3, of the Idaho Constitution and the Idaho Public Records Act. Recipient acknowledges that City is a governmental entity, and the validity of this Agreement is based upon the availability of public funding under the authority of its statutory mandate. Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, City's obligations under this Agreement are subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made by Meridian City Council for such purpose. L. Compliance with laws. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Recipient and each and all of Recipient's volunteers, employees, guests, invitees, and agents shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. M. State of Idaho requirements. The following provisions are required by the State of Idaho. The inclusion of these provisions in this Agreement does not indicate City's support or opposition to these provisions nor agreement by City that these clauses are relevant to the subject matter of this Agreement; these provisions are included solely to comply with the laws of the State of Idaho. 1. Anti-Boycott Against Israel Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2346, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under Israel's control. The terms "company" and "boycott Israel" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2346. 2. No Public Funds for Abortion Act. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 18-8703, as applicable, Recipient certifies that it is not, and will not for the duration of this Agreement become, an abortion provider or an affiliate of an abortion provider, as those terms are defined in the"No Public Funds for Abortion Act," Idaho Code §§ 18-8701 et seq. 3. Contract with company owned or operated by the government of China prohibited. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, as applicable, Recipient certifies that Recipient is not a company currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not for the duration of this Agreement be owned or operated by the government of China. The terms "company" and"government of China" shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Idaho Code § 67-2359. N. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. O. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 4 OF 5 P. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements, agreements, or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. No verbal or written inducements to execute this Agreement have been made to Recipient. In entering into this Agreement, Recipient relies upon no statement, fact, promise or representation, whether express or implied, written or oral, not specifically set forth herein in writing. Q. Successors and assigns. All of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each party and their successors, assigns, legal representatives, heirs, executors, and administrators. R. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice. S. Warranty of authority. Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of such party and is a valid and binding obligation upon the persons or entity signing this Agreement. T. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. RECIPIENT: Tf)ni Allison Meridian Area Senior Citizens Association, Inc. CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-18-2024 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER FOR FY24 NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT FUNDS PAGE 5 OF 5 EXHIBIT A C� fE IDIAN�--- 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Overview of Neighborhood Grant Program Meridian City Council has allocated $50,000 for Neighborhood Grants for 2024, to be awarded to Meridian residents for projects that bring Meridian neighbors together and improve the community. Applicants may apply for Neighborhood Grant funds in any amount up to $50,000 and request funds for more than one project. Projects must be completed by September 9, 2024. Timeline Application period open: October 2, 2023 Applications due: November 13, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Selection Panel Review Period opens: November 17, 2023 Selection panel Review period closes: December 8, 2023 Applicants Notified: December 15, 2023 Signed agreement due: January 15 2024 Project completion: September 9, 2024 Final report due: September 15, 2024, 5:00 p.m. Eligibility and Criteria Projects funded with Neighborhood Grant funds must be located on public property within the City of Meridian. Applicants must be residents of the City of Meridian or an organization operating within the City of Meridian. Upon selecting a project for funding, the City of Meridian will require the successful applicant to enter into a grant recipient agreement establishing terms and conditions of the grant funds (a sample agreement is available upon request). In awarding Neighborhood Grants, the selection panel will consider the following criteria: 1. Capacity for neighbor engagement in project implementation and final deliverable; 2. Contribution to the improvement of the neighborhood environment and sense of community; 3. Suitability of the proposed project for the project site; and 4. Long-term viability and impact of the proposed project. Application To apply, applicants must submit the following materials to the City Contact listed below. If applying for more than one grant, a separate application must be completed for each project. 1. Completed Grant Application form 2. Written narrative answering each of the following questions: a. What do you propose to accomplish and how? b. How do you plan to engage and use volunteers, specifically your neighbors, to help with the project? How many volunteers will be needed? c. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood, and how will you measure it? Neighborhood Grant Program Page 1 d. What is the plan for long-term maintenance of items that will be purchased, built, or installed with the funds (if applicable)? e. What is the priority of this project (if applying for grant funds for more than one project)? 3. Detailed project plan, including a timeline with specific dates. 4. Detailed project budget, listing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 5. If the project involves collaboration or co-funding with other organizations or businesses, a letter of support from each. City Contact Submit the application and reporting materials to, and direct any questions to: Jacob Cluff, Community Relations & Policy Advisor Address: 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Email:jcluff@meridiancity.org Phone: 208-489-0535 Reporting Requirements All projects must be completed by Friday, September 9, 2024. A final report must be submitted to the City Contact by Thursday, September 15, 2024. The final report must include the following: 1. Written narrative answering the following questions: a. What did you accomplish, and how? b. How were volunteers engaged and used, and how many? c. What is the impact of this project on your neighborhood? 2. Final project budget, showing Neighborhood Grant funds, partner organization funds, and in- kind and monetary donations. 3. Receipts supporting the final project budget. 4. Photographs of project completion and the final project. 5. A check payable to the City of Meridian for any unused funds. Purchasing Requirements If the proposed Project includes the purchase of goods, services, supplies, or equipment, purchases up to $15,000 will require one written quote, and purchases $15,001 to $50,000 require three written quotes. Documentation will be required prior to release of funds. Limitations Neighborhood Grant funds may not be spent on gift cards, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or travel. Funds will not be awarded to support any project that in any way: violates law or City policy; or violates a legal ownership interest, such as a copyright, of any party. Funds may not be spent for any purpose or message that includes, promotes, or fosters: profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; defamatory or personal attacks; threats to Neighborhood Grant Program Page 2 any person or organization; information that may compromise public safety; or any purpose or message that the City deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. Additional limitations may apply. Neighborhood Grant Program Page 3 C-z( E r� I y 2024 Neighborhood Grant Program Application Form EXHIBIT B Applicant Information Applicant name:* Organization(if applicable): Toni Allison Meridian Area Senior Citizens Association,Inc. Applicant's parent name(if Applicant is under 18): Meridian Senior Center/Center at the Park Phone Number:* E-mail: 2088886728 president@meridianseniorcenter.org Mailing Address:* P.O.Box 563 Meridian,ID 83680 Project Information Project Name:* Kleiner Park patio seating at Meridian Senior Cetner/Center at the Park Project Type:* Amenity(e.g.,neighborhood garden,bike rack,bike repair station,dog waste bag station) Beautification(e.g.signage,banners,trees,landscaping,art) Clean up(e.g.graffiti removal,overgrown vegetation removal,litter removal) Other Project Address/Location: 1920 N Records Way Meridian,Id 83646 Property owner: Meridian City(Parks and Recreation) Acknowledgments I, Toni Allison hereby acknowledge the following stipulations and agree that if this proposal is selected for funding under the Neighborhood Grant Program, such funding shall occur subject to these general terms and conditions,as well as subject to other specific terms and conditions that shall be set forth in a separate,written grant recipient agreement between myself and the City of Meridian. I specifically acknowledge that: * Before my Project is funded,I(or my parent/guardian)will be required to enter into a written agreement with the City TA establishing the specific terms and conditions of the grant funds provided. Initial * If this Project is selected for funding,neither the City of Meridian nor its officers or employees will assume liability for any loss or TA damage.This Project may involve risks,some of which are unknown. Initial * The procurement of any necessary insurance will be my sole responsibility.The City will not provide insurance or other coverage TA of any kind for loss,theft,or damage that I or anyone associated with the Project may or does incur. Initial * The City has made no offer or commitment to issue Neighborhood Grant funds;the City shall have no obligation to do so except TA by,and pursuant to,written agreement. Initial I acknowledge,understand,and agree to these general terms and conditions. Signature Print name: Toni Allison Pel�ff C4 Parent signature(If applicant is under 18): Date: 2023-11-01 Application online forms will be available at www.meridiancity.org/neighborhoodgrants Review the Grant Application Guidelines for further clarification. Project Information If you are submitting more than one grant application,you must rank them in priority order. This grant application is ranked#: 1 Out of: 1 applications. Project Name: Kleiner Park patio seating at Meridian Senior Cetner/Center at the Park If Applicable-Project Address/Location 1920 N Records Way Meridian,Id 83646 If Applicable-Who owns this property?: Meridian City(Parks and Recreation Dept.) Project Dates(estimated): Start: Completion: 2024-03-01 2024-04-30 Project Type: Beautification/Clean Up Di Park improvement Gardening/Vacant Lot Repurposing 0 Signage/Banners/Sign Toppers Tree Replacement/Planting 0 Dog Waste Station Bike Infrastructure 0 Events and Community Engagement Other Describe the project.(What are you going to do?): The Meridian Senior Center provides activities and services to the older adults of Meridian.Our membership age is 60+.We ended 2022 with 1347 paid members.This year,membership has remained steady.To join the Center is a minimum of$30 year.These funds go toward maintenance and operation of the Center.When we have a need to repair or enhance our facility,we must raise the funds to accomplish our goals with donations,fundraising,sponsorships and/or grants.The Center is located in Kleiner Park with 2 beautiful ponds and fountain adjacent.The water features are stocked with trout by the Idaho Fish and Game and are frequented by varieties of migrating waterfowl and raptors.One can step outside towards the pond through one of the Center's four glass doors onto a patio then a walkway onto grass before coming to the pond providing easy access to enjoy nature.For ten years,this large patio was"bare".Last year,the Idaho AARP State Office generously funded 4 tables and 15 seats to be purchased and installed on the patio.We are now seeking to complete the project with the purchase of 3 additional tables,9 seats(one table with 4 seats,along with one with 3 seats and a 3rd table with 2 seats,which will be ADA accessible)and 3 umbrellas for the enjoyment of not only our seniors but the community in general.The tables and seats are very attractive steel furnishings bolted to the cement.The umbrellas are portable to be taken indoors each evening.We want to entice seniors outdoors to participate in suitable activities such as enjoying lunch,birdwatching,fishing,cornhole games,chair volleyball and just experiencing the outdoors.We want to encourage movement,interaction and create more fun.Our art class wants to include nature painting and drawing.The utilization of this outdoor space would be a focal area for creativity as well as increased activity.The patio is handicap accessible from the Center's lobby,dining room and the art/exercise room.It provides a safe outdoor area for those in wheelchairs,using walkers or canes,to enjoy a piece of the park they've only been able to observe from the parking lot or from within the building.Our general population who frequents the park will also find an inviting place to sit for relaxation,enjoying nature,or resting after an invigorating walk through the park. Please include pictures of the impact area(if applicable): Table set with 4 seats diagrahm.docx 406.83KB Table sets diagrahm.docx 428.09KB Present day patio.jpg 315.17KB Umbrella in tan color.png 47.7KB How do you plan to gain/use volunteers,specifically your neighbors,to help on the project?(Provide Specific Numbers): Parks and Recreation Dept has indicated that they will do installation of tables and seats as they have already installed the 1 st set of same.Our dining room volunteers wipe the tables and seats on a daily basis for use during lunch on days that are conducive to sitting outdoors. Afterwards,people are able to play games,participate in artwork,etc.,orjust enjoy the beautiful park setting. What is the desired impact of this project on your neighborhood,and how will you measure it? We have already seen use of the patio setting by not only Senior Center members but also park visitors in general.We anticipate that the use of the patio will only increase as it is very inviting for walkers,fishermen,artists,birdwatchers,and any who just want a place to relax in our special park. Who will assume responsibility for maintaining the finished project or storing equipment(if applicable): The Senior Center staff and volunteers have been keeping the tables and seats clean.Every morning,the Center's bus drivers have brought out the umbrellas and put them away at the end of the day.We have obtained a box that allows for storage of the umbrellas when not in use in a convenient indoor area adjacent to the patio. Detailed Project plan, including timeline with specific dates: Upon receiving the funds,the tables and chairs will be ordered. When they arrive,they will be installed on the first day of clear weather.The umbrellas will be purchased for immediate use when the weather is conducive to sitting outdoors. If you are collaborating with other civic organizations/businesses on this project,you must provide their names and attach a letter of support from all: Partner Organization(s)Name,addresses, phone number and email: Is this grant part of an ongoing or larger project?If yes,please explain: Yes,this is a continuation to complete furnishing of the patio with seating.Three tables with four seats and one table with 3 seats have previously been purchased and installed.The table with only 3 seats is to allow a wheelchair to be used at the table. Project Budget Please include professional services,supplies/materials,printing/copying,permits,etc. *Donations/sponsorships are highly encouraged and will be considered favorably by the granting committee. Items Needed Donated AmountNalue Cost to Purchase 1. $ $ 42 inch table w/3 seats(ADA) 2794.00 2794.00 2. $ $ 42 inch table w/4 seats 3315.00 3315.00 3. $ $ 36 inch table w/2 seats(ADA) 2138.00 2138.00 4. $ $ 3 Umbrellas 329.97 329.97 5. $ $ Shipping 1463.00 1463.00 6. $ $ 7. $ $ 8. $ $ 9. $ $ 10. $ $ TOTALS(Total"cost to purchase"should equal your grant request total) $10,039.97 Total Grant Amount Requested: $10,039.97 Funds Disbursement Make check payable to: Meridian Area Senior Citizen Association,Inc. Civic Organizations: Applicant is serving as their own fiduciary* u The following organization will serve as our fiduciary *A Fiduciary is a group responsible for the project who will receive the check,cash it,and expend the funds Authorized Agent's Name: Toni Allison Signature Date Time 2023-11-01 pel�ff[jkedm Responsible Party Primary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail: Lisa Hansen 2088885555 director@meridianseniorcenter.org 1, Lisa Hansen if awarded the above project,will: • Keep all receipts • Complete the proposed project by Friday,September 6,2024 • File Grant Report(with receipts)by Friday,September 15,2024 • Pictures of the complete project/event are highly encouraged to be sent by email tojcluff@meridiancity.org Signature: Date: 2023-11-01 Liar#Wek Secondary Contact Name: Telephone: E-mail Kristin Page 2088885555 kristin@meridianseniorcenter.org Sonntag Recreation LLC QUOTE #2323 DATE: MARCH 1, 2023 4245 Panorama Cir, Salt Lake City, UT 84124 EXPIRATION DATE 10/31/22 Phone 801-278-9797 Fax 801-278-9794 0webbR-sonntagrec.com TO Lisa Hansen Center at the Park SALESPERSON JOB PAYMENT TERMS LEAD TIME Jeremiah NET 30 8-10 weeks QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE LINE TOTAL DUMOR MODEL #296-42-30TMUM/2 42" 1 DIA STL TABLE, PLATES, 3 SEATS, AQ $2,794.00 MAH DUMOR MODEL #296-42-40TMUM/2 42" 1 DIA STL TABLE, PLATES, 4 SEATS, AQ $3,315.00 MAH TX DUMOR MODEL #296-36-20TMUM/2 36" 1 DIA STL TABLE, PLATES, 2 SEATS, AQ $2,138.00 MAH TX, Windmaster Market Umbrellas with 6 Aluminum Pole 7-1/2' Dia. Umbrella with 1- $418.00 $2,508.00 1/2"Dia. Pole NOTE: Price does not include installation OR sales tax. Please SUBTOTAL $10,755.00 provide tax exempt certificate with purchase order. LESS DISCOUNT -$670.00 FREIGHT $1,463.00 TOTAL $11,548.00 Quotation prepared by: Jeremiah Webb This is a quotation on the goods named, subject to the conditions noted below: (Describe any conditions pertaining to these prices and any additional terms of the agreement. You may want to include contingencies that will affect the quotation.) To accept this quotation, sign here and return: THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! 41- I F0414 Recreation, LLC 4245 Panorama Circle;Salt Lake City,Utah 84124 (800)748-5450 toll free•(801)278-9797 phone (801)278-9794 fax•chris@sonntagrec.com TERMS AND CONDITIONS • This Sonntag Recreation quotation becomes a Sales Agreement and contract only upon receipt by Seller of the signed copy by fax, mail or email prior to the expiration date of the quotation and upon receipt of the required deposit. Cancellation of the Sales Agreement or any returns is only upon approval and may not be possible depending upon the manufacturer and on the time frame of the order and manufacturing. • Once the job has arrived, balance of the invoice is due per the terms of the agreement. All payments for the equipment are due at the Seller's address in Salt Lake City, Utah as shown above. A finance charge of 1.5% per month will be charged on any unpaid balance which becomes past due. Buyer agrees to pay reasonable attorney fees and collection expenses for the collection of any balance due under the agreement. • Sales tax will be charged on all invoices unless the Seller is provided a Tax Exemption Certificate when placing the order or before the invoice date. • This agreement constitutes the final, complete and exclusive statement of the contract between the Seller and the Buyer and supersedes all prior written and oral communications. No person is authorized by the Seller to make any additional or different representation, promises or warranties. Any changes to this Sales Agreement will be by Change Order upon agreement by both parties. • Manufacturer's warranties apply on products Delivered and the Seller's sole warranty is that the products delivered shall be in conformity with the description above. The Seller expressly disclaims all implied warranties, including warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. • Seller shall not be in breach of this agreement in the event of nonperformance occasioned by strikes, lockouts, accidents, fires, delays in production or acquisition of supplies, delays by carriers, acts of God, government actions, state of war, civil unrest or other causes beyond control of the seller. Buyer may not assign its rights or duties under this Agreement without Seller's prior written consent. Present Patio la _ � s Umbrella in Tan Color 09 7/16' 11 1/2' UMB HOLE A, K. I ST.PLATE F~23 3/4- 65 3/<' 16 1/4"42•P \L— . *2�1 1•X 3(N'OM)SLATS 19 1/4' (SEE SLAT OPOONS 10 Gti SPUN SR. / 24' 4, CRUpEO� 36' ENO Ly SLAT OPTIONS 12'SO jt2 • 1/2•s.sT- V+'sti S-1 EMBEDMENT 1x/xnSl+ETr Pu1E ❑ ANf10UE MAHOGANY TEXTURED 1AfT(N- ❑ BRAZILIAN WALNUT TEXTURED 35 7/1b'a/a^X r 3 SCH 4o STL WE27 1/z' 30 ❑ OTHER S1L. 7SCH 40 SR.PIPE {7 1/2'01).0.0, 3V T111.sn PLATE 7 NOTES: W/21/1C 0 ANCH R 1.) ALL STL. MEMBERS COATEU W/ ZINC RICH EPDXY THEN FINISHED �{ a/r F-- 3/4^ W/ POLYESTER PCWDER COATING. so sp. 2) •Sx / VEXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS PROIDED FOR 2 OPTION ❑ S-2 SURFACE MOUNT — • DATE DRAWN 4 9 20 REV. D11*10 TABLE a"„wFl°m A WLATER 296-42-30TXUMB 1 EDuMor, inc. RET,.RT, 69 7/16' p 16 t/a' 42'P 10 CA SPUN STL 1'X S'I Now)SLATS (SEE SLAT 0PTM6) IN 1FK. STL PLATE CRINPE04 -'+" /14 X 7/8'SM - HIX H0.LM SLAT OPTIONS 1/i'X t71/2'3.� 1/4-STt. n ANTIQUE MAHOGANY TEXTURED12"So �rmn�N �� BRAZILU(N WALNUT TEXTURED ❑ S-1 EMBEDMENT � ❑ OTHER 2 1/2' PE I / .D.(s I/z'o.B.) OTFS:(2 7/8 0.0.) 3/8'1H1(.SIL RAIE i/1e •eNn1BR 1) ALL L POLYESTER MEMBERS COATED DER COATINGW/ ZINC RICH EPDXY THEN FINISHED 2.) 1/2" X 3 3/4" EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS PROVIDED L2•�.. 6" FOR S-2 & S-4 OPTIONS. s0, s0. ❑ S-2 SURFACE MOUNT — • hPE ARn�r1 9 R'EV. ORAWINc TABLE , A 296-42-40TXUMB s EDuMor inc. ,�.� : E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Special Event— Meridian Fine Arts Festival C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney Meeting Date: June 18, 2024 Presenter: Bill Nary, City Attorney Estimated Time: 0.5 minutes Topic: Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park For Special Event- Meridian Fine Arts Festival Recommended Council Action: Please approve and authorize mayor to sign agreement. Background: Agreement establishing terms and conditions of use of Kleiner Park for Meridian Fine Arts Festival: • June 28, 2024, from 8:00 a.m.to 9:00 p.m. • June 29, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. • June 30, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT This Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park For Special Event (hereinafter"Agreement") is made thisl 8thday of June , 2024 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho (hereinafter "City"), and Meridian Fine Arts Festival, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho (hereinafter "Organizer"). WHEREAS, City and Organizer are mutually interested in enhancing the Meridian community's quality of life by providing and supporting special event opportunities for members of the Meridian and greater communities; WHEREAS, City and Organizer recognize that publicly-held facilities are resources requiring heightened stewardship and protection; WHEREAS, Organizer has agreed to be responsible for any costs incurred by City in the course of the special event hosted by Organizer at Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park ("Park"), located at 1900 N. Records Avenue, in Meridian, Idaho, on June 29, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., June 30, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with setup on June 28, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS,the Meridian City Council finds that it is fiscally responsible and in the best interest of the community to enter into a contractual agreement establishing the terms and conditions of Organizer's use of Park; NOW, THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and in consideration of the recitals above, which are incorporated herein, City and Organizer agree as follows: I.PERMISSION GRANTED. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, City hereby grants to Organizer permission to utilize Park at the time, place, and manner set forth in this Agreement and in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-24-0084 for a large-scale special event known as "Meridian Fine Arts Festival" ("Event"). II.OBLIGATIONS OF ORGANIZER. A. Reasonable use. Organizer shall employ best efforts to ensure that its use of Park and Park facilities, amenities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation is appropriate and reasonable. Where Organizer's use of Park and Park facilities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation causes disproportionately excessive damage to same, Organizer shall reimburse City for the cost or proportionate cost of necessary repairs and/or replacement. Organizer shall exercise best efforts to see that any and all use of Park, to the extent reserved by Organizer, is in compliance with all laws and with City's policies regarding use of City parks and/or facilities, including, but not limited to, policies be adopted or enacted by the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE I B. Permitting. In addition to compliance with all terms and provisions of this Agreement, Organizer shall separately obtain and comply with each and all of the following permits, as required by law: 1. City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit for Large Scale Special Event; 2. Any and all applicable licenses, permits, inspections, and/or certifications from the Ada County Highway District; 3. Any and all applicable licenses, permits, inspections, and/or certifications from the Central District Health Department; 4. Any and all reservations, permits, and inspections required by the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. C. Fees, costs. If staffing or extended hours are required for the protection of public safety or maintenance of Park due to Event, Organizer shall reimburse City for all staffing costs within fourteen (14) days of City's invoice for such costs. If Organizer fails to timely reimburse City pursuant to such invoice, the City may decline to provide extra-duty personnel staffing, decline to reserve City facilities, release Organizer's reservations of City facilities for the Event, or decline to allow the subsequent use of City facilities for Event or any iteration thereof. D. Time and place. The permission extended under this Agreement shall apply to the areas of Park detailed on the event site plan approved by City under City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-24-0084, from June 29, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., June 30, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with setup on June 28, 2024, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pursuant to City Code, Park shall be closed between dusk and dawn. E. Manner. The permission extended under this Agreement shall be subject to all terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement, in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-24-0084, and in any applicable laws and policies, including, without limitation, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Event Planners' Handbook. Such terms and conditions shall include,but shall not be limited to, the following: 1. The public must have general access to all areas of Park at all times during the event, so long as such access does not unduly interfere with Organizer's use of Park for Event. 2. Driving or parking vehicles on non-designated driving or parking surfaces shall be prohibited. 3. Where activities or equipment related to Event damage or destroy turf, landscaping, sprinklers, or other Park infrastructure or facilities, or otherwise require City to incur additional expenses, Organizer shall reimburse City for all costs of repair, replacement, or expense within fourteen (14) days of City's invoice for such costs. 4. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, under the authority granted to him by Meridian City Code section 13-2-7(A), shall, and hereby does, order that the Park closing time shall be waived as to overnight security personnel for the Event. Security personnel for the Event may remain in the Park after park closure on June 28, 2024 until park opening on June 29, 2024, and after park closure on June 29, 2024 until park AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 2 opening on June 30, 2024 for the purpose of securing goods left overnight in the Park by vendors. 5. Organizer shall make every effort to provide and maintain access to Event for persons with disabilities. 6. No smoking shall be allowed in Park, except in designated parking areas. 7. Used water, grease, charcoal, and other materials and supplies must be carried out of Park at the conclusion of Event, and may not be disposed of at Park. 8. Organizer is authorized to post signs for the purpose of identifying, promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event as represented and approved in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-24-0084. Organizer acknowledges that the permission extended by City under this Agreement to post signs shall extend only to the locations approved in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-24-0084, and that it is unlawful to post a sign identifying, promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event without the permission of the owner of such property. Organizer shall remove all signs identifying,promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event by dusk on Sunday, June 30, 2024. 9. Organizer shall provide a medical services station at Event. Such station shall be clearly marked and accessible to all Event participants. At least two (2)personnel trained and certified to provide first aid shall be at the Event and available if needed at all times. F. Insurance. As required by Meridian City Code, Organizer shall submit to City proof of an insurance policy issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in Idaho protecting Organizer, Organizer's employees, and Organizer's agents from all claims for damages to property and bodily injury, including death, which may arise during or in connection with Event, including Event set-up and tear-down. Such insurance shall name City as an additionally insured party, and shall afford at least one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per person bodily injury, one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence bodily injury, and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence property damage. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City as set forth in this Agreement or any permit. If City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits herein provided due to the actions or omissions of Organizer or any Organizer employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, and/or invitee, or any participant in or observer of Event or related activities, Organizer covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property. III. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY. A. Facility operation. Except as otherwise set forth herein, City shall provide general maintenance, mowing, irrigation, and custodial services with regard to Park facilities, infrastructure, and vegetation. City shall provide all necessary utilities and services to Park facilities, including, but not limited to, electricity, potable water, sewage service, and/or typical waste and refuse removal. City shall cause the repair and/or replacement of any and AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 3 all Park facilities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation that are physically damaged by acts of nature. To the extent that the cause of damage is attributable to Event activities, Organizer shall be responsible for the cost of repair or replacement. B. Primary Source of Contact for City. City shall provide Organizer the name, e-mail address, and telephone number of specific City personnel (hereinafter"City Contact") who shall serve as City's primary contact between City and Organizer for all day-to-day matters regarding set-up, operation, and tear-down of in Park. City Contact for Event shall be: City Contact: Skyler Cook, Recreation Coordinator Meridian Parks and Recreation Department E-mail: scook@meridiancity.org Office Phone: 208-888-3579 IV.GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. Communication between Organizer and the City Contact regarding day-to-day matters shall occur via e-mail or telephone. All other notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, or via e-mail, addressed as follows: City: Organizer: City of Meridian Lauren Kistner Attn: City Clerk Meridian Fine Arts Festival, LLC 33 E. Broadway Avenue 10382 Lake Shore Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Nampa, Idaho 83686 cityclerk@meridiancity.org meridianfineartfest@gmail.com B. Public park. The parties hereto expressly acknowledge that Park is a public space, the management and scheduling of which shall at all times be within the sole purview of City. City shall have the right to allow the use of Park, and close all or any portion of Park, for any and all purposes and under any and all conditions. C. No right to exclude conveyed. Any exclusive use granted to Organizer by this Agreement shall include neither the right to exclude any law-abiding person from Park where such person is not interfering with Organizer's use thereof, nor the right to interfere with any person's concurrent, lawful use of Park where such concurrent use does not conflict or interfere with Organizer's use. At all times Organizer shall be on an equal footing with the general public regarding its use of Park. Organizer shall exercise any exclusive use granted by this Agreement only in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and in accordance with any and all applicable laws and City policies. D. Assignment. Organizer shall not assign or sublet all or any portion of Organizer's interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of City. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations, legal representative, successors, and assigns of the parties. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 4 E. No agency. Neither Organizer nor Organizer's employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees shall be considered agents of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in their use and occupancy of Park. F. Indemnification. Organizer and each and all of Organizer's employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees, including any and all participants in Event or related activities, shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Organizer or any Organizer employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, and/or invitee, or any participant in or observer of Organizer programming, at or in its use of Park or any lack of maintenance or repair thereon and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City. G. No warranty. City makes no warranty or promise as to the condition, safety, usefulness, or habitability of the premises; Organizer accepts Park for use as is, both at the Effective Date of this Agreement and throughout the course of Event and all related activities. H. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and Organizer shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. I. Attorney Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Time of the essence. The parties shall fulfill obligations described in this Agreement in a timely manner, as set forth herein. The parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a default of this Agreement. K. Termination. 1. Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to: an act or omission by either party which breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare. 2. Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing twenty-four(24) hours notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination. A twenty-four (24) hour cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate. If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement shall be terminated upon mailing or e- mailing of notice of termination. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 5 L. Breach. An► ad or onlis4ion b► either party which breaches any term of this Agreement may provide ground; for termination In the event of breach, the ity may also decline to pro\ ide e\tra-dut\ per-,onnel staffing, decline to reverve City facilities, release existing reservations of'(-'ity facilities, or decline to allow the ,ubsequent use of[ ity facilities for Event or any iteration thereof. M. Construction and severabilit►. If any part of thk Agreement is held to be Invalid or unenforceable, ,uch holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. N. Entire Agreement. This \greement contains the entire agreement of the parties and Nupersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previou, to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Applicable law. Thi, Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the law,, of the State of Idaho. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by both Organizer and by Meridian City Council. IN «'ITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duty authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. ORGANIZER: BY: Lauren Kistner Organizer, Meridian Fine Arts Festival, LLC CITY OF NIERIDIA\: Attest: BY: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-18-2024 Chris Johnson, City Clerk6-18-2024 AGRI '-MFNTFOR I�SEOF KII-INI It PARK Fnk SPH IAIANFNT P viF 0 w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 24-2459: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, Setting Forth Certain Findings and Purposes to Declare Surplus Property and Authorizing the Donation of Certain Computer and Equipment to Computers for Kids CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 24-2459 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES TO DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE DONATION OF CERTAIN COMPUTER AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPUTERS FOR KIDS WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Meridian to declare that certain computers and equipment as attached in Exhibit"A" as surplus, as these particular items are no longer needed or used by the City of Meridian; WHEREAS,the City of Meridian's purchasing policy allows surplus City property to be donated to other agencies exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code when the value of the property in question is of nominal value, that is, valued at less than the cost of disposing of the property; WHEREAS,the cost of maintaining the computer equipment would result in the unnecessary expenditure of City funds; and WHEREAS,the City of Meridian desires to donate the computer equipment listed in Exhibit "A"to Computers for Kids, which is exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize and declare that certain computers and equipment as attached hereto as Exhibit"A" are surplus property. Section 2. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorizes the donation of the computers and equipment listed in Exhibit"A"to Computers for Kids. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this18th day of June, 2024. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18thday of June, 2024. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk EXHIBIT A DEPARTMENT C��fE 1I Information Technology DEPARTMENT CONTACT CITY OF MERIDIAN Jen Robbins PROPERTY INFORMATION FORM CITY TAG# DESCRIPTION LOCATION See attached y See attached Basement Storage MODEL MANUFACTURER SERIAL/VIN# See Attached See Attached See Attached ACQUISITION DATE ORIGINAL COST VENDOR LIFESPAN See Attached See Attached See Attached See Attached PROPERTY DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION DISPOSAL METHODS Give a brief description of how you plan on disposing the asset Auction/Sell We plan to donate these items to Computers for Kids X Donation/Transfer Trade In Discard/Recycle "Please remove all identifying logos prior to disposal REASON FOR DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY Decommissioned Equipment CONDITION OF PROPERTY TO BE DISPOSED Fair 6/4/24 Department Des�iigne Approval Date s Finance Reviewed Date FOR FINANCE USE ONLY FA# GL Code: Resolution No.: Approved by Council Date: Final Disposition of Property: \\meridian.local\shares\IT\Inventory\2024 Inventory\June 2024 Disposal\Disposal Request Form 052924.xlsx 1 of 2 Instructions for submitting Property Disposal Request: A. Department will obtain a signature for approval of Department Designee. B. Send to Finance Department(Accountant)for review and signature. C. Finance(Accountant)will return a copy of the approved form to the Department so they can proceed with disposal. *The Department will remove all identifying logos prior to disposal if applicable. *Any fixed assets that is to be disposed or sold without public notice,public sale,or at auction must be authorized by City Council resolution prior to disposal or sale. a. Finance(Accountant)will send copy of signed disposal request to Legal(Legal Services Support Manager)and Department for Resolution draft. Department will coordinate with Legal (Legal Services Support Manager);add Disposal Form and Resolution draft to next available Council Agenda using Agenda Manager Software. E. The Department will contact the auction company or donating agency to arrange pick up. F. Once the property is disposed of, Finance will note on the form the Final Disposition of Property and will delete item from the Fixed Asset Listing. Departments will note the disposition on their Inventory Listing. G. Finance and/or Department will notify Legal to remove item from insurance policy See Fixed Asset Policy for more information See Disposal Flowchart for more information \\meridian.local\shares\IT\Inventory\2024 Inventory\June 2024 Disposal\Disposal Request Form 052924.xlsx 2 of 2 Asset Tag Description MFG Vendor Model Serial No Working Cost Acq Date 190067 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WP Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190077 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WD Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 180064 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G3 MXL741205F Yes 825.00 10/19/2017 180226 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G3 MXL8241W75 Yes 825.00 06/14/2018 190065 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WV Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 150108 UPS APC CDWG Smart-UPS 1500 SAS1529322376 Yes 596.32 09/08/2015 (SUA1500RM2U) 180216 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G3 MXL8241W73 Yes 825.00 06/14/2018 190081 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WR Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 180234 Wad Apple SCW Wad Pro 10.5"256GB SDMPWL9VRHPDV Yes 864.44 07/30/2018 180115 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450109 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 180116 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52420272 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 200162 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 000319191153 Yes 1226.38 03/09/2020 100874 Scanner Canon CDWG DR-M160 Document FQ311629 No 861.44 03/10/2014 Scanner 190086 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514X2 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 180215 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G3 MXL8241W76 Yes 825.00 06/14/2018 190080 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XB Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 180114 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450192 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 100814 Printer HP Office Max LaserJet 1606dn VND31348499 No 175.00 10/01/2013 180113 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450189 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 180112 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450193 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 180111 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450190 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 180110 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450108 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 180109 Server Nutanix Advanced Systems NX-6155-G5-2680v4 17SM52450110 Yes 29210.00 11/01/2017 Group 190170 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG852460W Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190073 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XM Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190074 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514X1 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190105 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XJ Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190075 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514X6 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190072 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XV Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190172 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245LM Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190171 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245FP Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190083 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XW Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190174 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG852460C Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 180156 Laptop HP CDWG Elitebook 840 G4 5CG8170FPV Yes 1475.00 05/01/2018 190168 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245DB Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190166 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85246XN Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190169 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG852469V Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190084 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514X7 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190173 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG852460P Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190113 Wireless Router Tempered Optiv HIPS-100gs-V Wireless 101C20100265 Yes 715.93 11/09/2018 Networks Router 190165 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245G8 Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190082 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WN Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 180251 Laptop HP CDWG Elitebook 840 G4 5CG8340RXZ Yes 1475.00 08/13/2018 100363 Switch ShoreTel VLCM ShoreGear 220 T1A T1AJ11031AE4CD Yes 2700.00 01/01/2010 100763 Switch ShoreTel VLCM ShoreGear T1k TlKJ08210CB7FC Yes 2700.00 09/25/2010 100911 Switch ShoreTel VLCM ShoreGear 220 T1A T1AF1150233C46 Yes 2700.00 09/25/2008 190108 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514W9 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190153 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245CR Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190162 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245NG Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190099 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514X8 Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190098 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XS Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190085 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WW Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190161 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245CH Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 200070 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G5 MXL9423GLP Yes 920.00 10/11/2019 200003 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro LTE 046920792153 Yes 1563.89 10/04/2019 200010 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 016124792253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 190187 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG903350MF Yes 1439.50 02/06/2019 150000 Tablet Microsoft GovConnection Surface Pro 3 005071144853 Yes 1399.99 04/23/2015 190102 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WG Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190101 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WT Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 200004 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 015667392253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 190160 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85246F4 Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190158 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245C6 Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 190064 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XC Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 200008 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 015687192253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 200012 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 016181492253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 200007 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 010214692253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 190190 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245D1 Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 200006 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 007126592553 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 100271 Thin Client HP HP Retired Product CNV8320601 Yes 0.00 01/23/2023 190159 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245F5 Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 200045 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G5 MXL9423GL1 Yes 920.00 10/11/2019 0 Switch HP N/A Procurve 2915 CNOOB030NZ Yes N/A N/A 190092 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XD Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 200091 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 016096692253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 200009 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 016175192253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 200002 Tablet Microsoft SCW Surface Pro 6 009572592253 Yes 1398.69 10/04/2019 0 Monitor dell N/A OLD n/a No N/A N/A 170193 Accessory Pearl VLCM Epiphan Video Mobile ED7DAAA0 No 4558.13 12/05/2016 Streaming 170131 Accessory Pearl VLCM Epiphan Video Mobile EDEB6336 No 4558.13 12/05/2016 Streaming 180199 Wad Apple SCW Wad 32GB Wi-Fi+ DMPWJW8KJF88 Yes 521.22 06/12/2018 Cellular 180209 Desktop HP CDWG Prodesk 600 G3 MXL8241W72 Yes 825.00 06/14/2018 0 Monitor dell N/A OLD n/a No N/A N/A 0 Monitor dell N/A No N/A N/A 190199 Laptop HP CDWG ProBook 640 G4 5CG85245DK Yes 1439.50 01/09/2019 0 UPS APC N/A BR1000 Yes N/A N/A 109016 UPS APC SCW UPS SUA1500R2X180 WS1028156129 Yes 1500.00 07/15/2010 100945 UPS APC SCW Smart-UPS 1500 AS0823130275 Yes 1500.00 08/19/2008 (SUA1500RM2U) 300093 UPS APC SCW Smart-UPS 1500 AS1108230146 Yes 800.00 10/01/2010 (SUA1500RM2U) 0 Monitor Viewsonic N/A VA2231wm n/a Yes N/A N/A 0 Monitor Viewsonic N/A VA2231wm n/a Yes N/A N/A 190071 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WX Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190095 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XL Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190070 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514XO Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190093 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WY Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190078 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WH Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190062 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WF Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 190079 Desktop HP CDWG ProDesk 600 G4 MXL84514WJ Yes 927.50 11/13/2018 0 Desktop Lenovo N/A ThinkCentreM70a MJOEAHZW No N/A N/A 0 Printer HP N/A laser jet477FNW Yes N/A N/A W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 24-2460: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 9.8, Regarding Grant Management; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 24-2460 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO AMEND CITY OF MERIDIAN STANDARD OPERATING POLICY 9.8 ,REGARDING GRANT MANAGEMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City Council has authority over the policies of the City of Meridian; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds it in the best interest of the City of Meridian to update the grant management policy to ensure consistent practices pertaining to grant applications and administration of funds received; and NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy no. 9.8, regarding Grant Management, shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of June, 2024. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of June, 2024. APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION AMENDING STANDARD OPERATING POLICY NO.9.8 PAGE 1 �WENt F City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy Number 9.8 Grant Application and Administration Policy Purpose: To set forth the City's policy regarding the submission of grant applications and administration of grant funds received. Policy: 1. Prior to submitting a grant application on behalf of the City, the department submitting such application ("Applicant") shall: a. Obtain approval from Applicant's Department Director, and b. Seek review by the Grant Committee of the proposed grant application and all grant requirements. 2. Volunteers shall not be authorized to submit grant applications on behalf of the City. Only City employees, acting in accordance with this policy and related procedures, shall be authorized to submit grant applications on behalf of the City. 3. Following award of a grant to the City: a. All grant funds received by the City shall be used in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, City policy, and the terms of the grant. Federal grant funds shall be used in accordance with the Uniform Guidance (Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals, and Audit Requirements of Federal Awards). b. The Finance Department shall complete all accounting and financial reporting, as required by City policy,the granting entity, and any applicable laws. c. The Applicant shall complete all required administrative tasks associated with the grant (e.g., screening and monitoring any and all contractors and/or subrecipients, operational and performance reporting, data collection, and regulatory compliance). Authority& Responsibility: 1. The Applicant is responsible for providing the proposed grant application and all supporting documentation, including but not limited to all procurement requirements of the grant, to the Grant Committee for review before submitting the grant application to the granting entity. 2. The Finance Department is responsible for convening the Grant Committee following a request for review, and for conveying the Committee's recommendation to the Applicant following review of the application by the Grant Committee. 3. The Mayor is authorized to make the final decision regarding submission of a grant application and acceptance of grant funding. Revision date: 5/2/2024 4. Department Directors are authorized to sign grant applications. 5. The Mayor is authorized to sign grant applications and any and all agreements with a granting entity. Revision date: 5/2/2024 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Update and Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Hether Hill, Community Development Meeting Date: June 18, 2024 Presenter: VRT; Elaine Clegg and/or Stephen Hunt Estimated Time: Topic: Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Budget Request Recommended Council Action: n/a Background: Valley Regional Transit is requesting$880,293.00 in the FY2025 Budget. The total dues are broken out as follows: Annual Assessment- $82,019.00; Capital - $12,514.00; Local/Service Assessment- $525,837.00; and Limited Special Services - $259,923.00. VRT staff are present to provide an explanation of services provided as part of the $880,293.00 contribution. (@ valleyreg ionaltransit City of Meridian 33 East Broadway Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Attention: Todd Lavoie, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Valley Regional Transit FY2O25 Funding Request Dear Mr. Lavoie, The following table outlines the preliminary funding requests of the City of Meridian for FY2O25. The information provided is based on preliminary budget proposals. Table 1. FY25 funding Request by Assessment Type Amount General Assessment (calculated by regional share of the population) $82,019 Service Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your $525,837 jurisdiction) Capital Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your $12,514 jurisdiction) Special Assessment (Negotiated) $259,923 Financial Reserve Contribution $0 Total Request $880,293 General Assessments support regional overhead expenses (administration, finance, communications, etc.) Service Assessments support service operations and associated paratransit, preventive maintenance, planning and administration. Service Assessments for each jurisdiction are based on the direct service provided in that community. Capital Assessments support capital procurement, design or construction projects for asset maintenance and replacement of rolling stock that has reached the end of its useful life. It also includes enhancements approved in the adopted Transit Development Plan. Special Assessments are requested to support activities, programs or projects outside of the maintenance rolling stock and improved enhancements assessments. Special assessments are negotiated with the jurisdiction/organization and typically include new services or projects that are funded by discretionary grants. Financial Reserve Contribution is under review and will be continued if the board takes action on a new policy. 700 NE 2nd Street,Suite 100• Meridian, ID 83642•p:208.846.8547•f:208.846.8564• 1.855.345.7433 Financial Assumptions The Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Board is committed to making sure existing and future resources are used in alignment with the strategic direction and priorities adopted by the VRT Board of Directors. Our assessment requests reflect the board priorities using current services and planned or member requested improvements and are based on a cost allocation metric that accounts for population in your service area and services provided. We work to provide our funding partners with the best information possible as they work through their own budget development process and to work with them to respond to their needs and plans. VRT's budget is dependent on local partner contributions and the amount of federal funding available. As such our budget must sometimes be adjusted during the budget process in response to those points. We will communicate with you as early as possible on any needed adjustments. We will continue to refine our budget over the summer and complete our federal programming which may impact the local share requirements. VRT brings substantial resources to the Treasure Valley through federal funds, but all federal funds require local match. We sometimes have federal funds that cannot be spent due to lack of local funds to match them. All local funds contributed by your organization will be matched where possible. Typical federal match rates are 80% federal 20% local on capital projects and as much as 50%federal and 50% local for operations. VRT assessed $259,923 for Meridian local contribution towards Specialized Transportation in FY2025. The programs in this assessment includes: Beyond Access, Rides-2-Wellness, Meridian VA Service and Meridian Medical Transportation. Should you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at (208) 258-2701 or shunt@ridevrt.org. Thank you for your continued support of Valley Regional Transit. Sincerely, Stephen Hunt Chief Development Officer Valley Regional Transit Cc: David Tiede - Chief Information Officer, City of Meridian - dtiede@meridiancity.org Jenny Fields - Budget Analyst, City of Meridian -jfields@meridiancity.org Ricardo Ortiz Miller- Finance Analyst, City of Meridian - rortizmiller@meridiancity.org Kyle Street - VRT Programming and Budget Planner - kstreet@ridevrt.org Cameron Wells - Chief Financial Officer - cwells@ridevrt.org Caleb Hood - Planning Division Manager - chood@meridiancity.org Hether Hill - Long Range Associate Coordination Planner- hhill@meridiancity.org Valley Regmional Transmit FY2025 Request City of Meridian Budget Workshop tune 18, 2024 FY2025 Budget Request ■ Budget Overview Process ■ VRT Overview - - ■ Overview of Transportation Services Vt- ■ Budget Request t Ovalleyregionaltransit Budget Process Budget Timeline 2024 & 2025 Requests • Apr - CEO Intro letter Funding Category • Apr/May - Preliminary funding request 'General Assessment $83,351 $82,019 • May/Jun - Service and funding Service Assessment $586,202 $525,837 request discussions Capital Assessment $22,361 $12 514 Special Assessment* $179,700 $259,923 • Jul/Aug - Budget finalization Total Request $871,614 $880,293 • Aug/Sept - Cooperative agreements Ovalleyregionaltransit Fixed-Route V * • VRT Overview • • Access Village Van IqFkTransit Connections Volunteer Driver VRT STAFF 149 0&M CONTRACTED ROUTES. GO A16- W3ACTIVE BUS STOPS(2023) TRANSIT CENTERS/ 700ACTIVE BUS STOPS(2024) 4MAINTENENCE FACILITY JACILITIES 190969198 TOTAL 10G,8Z RIDES DOOR- TO-DOOR RIDERSHIP RIDES BUSES x0 Electric 35 civG jkCUTAWAYS 9F s, Z CNG 1.2MIL ROUTE � d RIDES ® .b.,�.n. Gasoline 1MIL 900K 2 VANS/MINIVANS OTHER ? support 22Vans (115) -- 8 Service 800K Minivans (1 6) 3Adrnin 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Growth since COVID-19! iOvalleyregionaltransit 4 FY2024 Service Change June 3 , 2024 BETTER FJ Bus ROUTES ■ Significant network restructure ■ Targeting 20% increase in ridership ■ Increased frequency on major routes ■ Increased trips between Meridian , Nampa , and Boise ■ New sign blades and information holders currently being installed Ovalleyreg ionaltransit Questions? li FARES F a. •wa. SINGLE RIDE $1.50 $0.75 Enhanced Passenger ���MW� PASS 1p at1�m�"a�.. 02.sa $i.ss ROUTE COLOR LEGEND The route w1or means a bus Domes every_.. ■ F}color tle fa rura s�Wca qw urr au�bri5 Aria cads... Morning Wday Evening Information 0 Framb 0 Imrab �Mj- e<av�rAo� w� ziso-iau.in ao nv� fnae��.s�6wn �� TbMIle Squen MIMI sispe.-a]6gm xl n.. erriaraaen.i "tE"° res.nxas Fm !]n... er,iuw a ai.�rnw,� Nk--gh aY—a.r—d TMNG 5q=a MIN c...�ara�� cd.a Fm.r.ia ur.u.c un. E. Lj A%—,-d c.re.a FrxAan F,....4&l Easy to understand F �WW ■ i FraNd A MdAW E,n,r,aa a.rr.r li F�ir�una oKn�ra Fergeawya rrawl RPll hklS rbSwT�Rtl EIIMIi{.!'g RoorrY[ � LNah6Ro..Fit ArtyOHtl�ad Lilih ■ Highlights level of service r k+anaupn. aW. Anb,k.rv,dLxm ��^� Mn,l.aiu dlnn Anurk.r�.&5ryorylrr rwrn.cn vorx ± Riwe 6nslh .Nwk.iudShaNn. Rhrral5di ■ Instructions on how to use R4a dA Ri I Rhw6Pw RAyr d.LiryrSh. Fr�Yr9vaot sunup c�nd a Riv« af9g15Snat Stllbn ■ Shows fares with QR code 3 ■ Contact information 1 4 r CYO ARE HER Ovalleyregionaltransit valleyregionaltransit 6 Overview of Transportation Services F�l r �1 Meridian Transmit r � ■ FIXED ROUTE : 30, 401 421 45 ■ SPECIALIZED : Access, Beyond - �* Access, Meridian Veterans y �� Shuttle, Meridian Medical Transportation, Volunteer Driver Program,. L ft Late Night � Y g Ovalleyregionaltransit '�' t ^" �Weekday�Dia de is Sernana �Weekday�Dia de la Sernana Route 30 . . � pz anFuard Toward River Valley&Records 2T in T TN7 �ayA a PEAK ONLY a 4 rd a ��Statistics a� ` &rd a Ncko7 _ bd �h 8:30 8:42 8:47 8:55 7:57 8:04 81138 8:20 FY2025 Projected I�L 9:30 9:42 9:47 9:55 8:55 9:02 9:06 9:18 Ridership I 10:30 10A2 10:47 10:55 l 9:55 10:02 10:06 10:18 .. 3:00 3:14 3:19 3:27 2!27 2:37 2:41 2:52 • 3,000 B o a rd i n gs 4:00 4:14 4:19 4:27 I 3:27 3:35 3:39 3.50 5:00 5:14 5:19 5:27 4:27 4:35 4:39 4:50 MAJOR STOPS PI 6:00 6:14 6:19 6:26 l 5:27 5:35 5:39 5:50 FY2023 RIVER VALLEY&RECORDS t 6:26 6:35 6:38 6:49 PINE&.3RD STREET • 30,924 Passenger LINUER&PINE Timetable miles WAYFINDER&VANGUARD V r ; ae • 5,219 b oa rd i n gs 3�Pw Read top to hottomforfheti Pe � a bus departs from ma orstns � PAINTS OF INTEREST Pine TheVilkageatMeridian &Tall Pine` ►i�ladghtforabustdp • 8°b 21 daily b oa rd i n gs Julius M.!(Feiner Memorial Park a:sb • Meridian Crossroads - - }-I ,-{�' 3:85 b6G Meridian City Hall ■The stun list shows every bus stop StaRllst .« Unbound Spaces Meridian Public Library ,� ■Planyourtriphy+dewingmajorstop I��m+ MeridianMiddleSchool times before andafteryourstop = FY 2 024 Changes Meridian High School a Harks Corner The Lofts at Ten Mile • Ten Mile Crossing Route u to Shortened o rte n e d & _ o Buis 9rnp Wayfinder Aerada do Bus A rransrer ca: I ' &Vanguard PM times are 6bl.OEd Las horarios PM BpO�+MA noe3,goK opens 1200 Muda wa alasiN ni uW na fit ra.r����,a estan en NEGRITA eqa adgeneno)xpnaM wpxdroM mida wajioni niHOLUED Overlaps with valleyregionaltransit MaferStert "Trips do not run an 'Los autobusesnooperan 3Ark1HeOCyLL1CLi611AgCfl6AHN *Safari hazuanyikisikuza 1J P—d. red used s.rvic-n en digs de seraiciore ucrd0 COKpaxteNKom ofi�nyNWeaKNN. hudurnailyopuV—wa Route 45 for 30 minute service Ovalleyregionaltransit 9 Route 5 4 �WToward University&Joyce Toward Collep of Westem eekday I Dia de la Semana I�Weekday I Dia de la Semana tatistics Front&9th 4� Idaho Main Campus S x T Vista W(�) University 0 — — a7 000 &Joyce m m r m y to i d r m w ry PEAK ONLY 0�}W�L}tf� Ft 3� M � �� �LL F M F M .ALL iE FY2025 •': . , J � Towne Projected Ridership Mall 01 (t) C ( -'; 0 u C) o o O� Cole i • _ T (D0 MaPleGrnve 6:15 6:26 6:35 6:46 6:56 7:10 7:22 7:00 7:14 7119 7:25 7:35 7:42 7:57 • 13,000 Boa rd i ngs 00 7:15 7:26 7:35 7:46 7:56 8:10 6:22 7:80 7:44 7:49 755 9:06 8:13 8:29 FY2023 8:15 8:26 8:35 9-46 8:56 9:10 9:22 8:30 RA-4 9-49 8:55 9:05 9:12 9-27 F81fYleW Five Mde • 6;&Frve Mile 2:45 2:59 3:08 3:22 3*28 3:3g 3:55 4:00 4:17 4.23 4:30 4:41 4:50 5:06 • 40,263 Passenger - .----. .,._ - 3:45 3:59 4:08 4:22 4:28 4:34 4:51 5:00 5:17 5:23 5:30 5:43 5:51 6:09 4:45 4:59 5:08 5:22 5:28 5:37 5:54 6:00 6:17 6:23 6:30 6:41 6:50 7.06 miles MAJOR STOPS RiverYalley 5:45 5:59 6:08 6:22 6:28 6:37 6:54 7:00 7:17 7:2.3 7:30 7:41 7:50 9:06 &Records � • 5,280 boa rd i ngs CWI MAIN CAMPUS i(DOG) r TEN MILE&VANGUARD ��,srcro�e • 18 boardings/Day PINE&3RD MerkMi $ imd IrYe This route has stops • o RIVER VALLEY&RECORDS { _ Imetable $ Offering Branco Shuttle Ridership is up 20% „,ter W i —ORANGELINE It's free FAIRVIEW&FIVE MILE - sa J I MON•FRI I LUM-WE BUS EVERY t0 ride! Wayfinder 7Reaftcttom for thetime yf mmmajorstops r 2 a f:WRM-S:W V 8rnin FY202 Changes TOWNE SQUARE MALL T�nMle &Vanguard bu0pro-9:00prd 15min 2_ — 1— 1:3d This route serves UNIVERSITY&JOYCE Ten Milo i.Readlefttorightforabustrip r 'u a" -BLUE LINE stops featuring the Consolidated with rout W�• '°` �` MUNfRIItUkUfE BUS EVERY Branco Shuttle. 30 POINTS OF INTEREST — ■The stsklist shows every bus stop SURI-I t �x fs�: 6min Ford Idaho Center i e.nw.e. a—t.t tracking &06Phr-9:06f'M 16 min boisestate.etaspot.nel Ten Mile Crossing McDermott ■Plan yourtripbyviewingmajorstop -- MeridianHighSchool times befereand afteryourstop : :,w� GREEN LINE lnforrnm6n on espa3of • Increased connections Ada County West Campus ------- MON-FRI I LUM-WE BUS EVERY dspenla�apf i66n�l between Nampa Scentsy Commons . I Rohlnson 3i]r AM-5 W PM l non yport6lAM 0. Julius M.Kliener Memorial Park Call of The Sho son Milwaukee a BusStap Meridian, Boise p Western) Ihoi pa.a�, s•s Boise Public Library Main Ce 0 Transfer to: PPoI times are BOLDED Los horarios PM epenw qnn noe3goK r acne 1200 Muda wa alasirl ni um na T.e„zr n w�: estin en NEGRITA v6eua eh1,geAeH07KV1pHb1M wpxd<roM mida wajioni ni EOLDED 4 ralleyregionaltrdnsiF Major Stops "Trips do not run on *Las autobuses no operan -floe3AK61 He ocyuleCi6nA10TCFl rz AHN 'Safari hazifarryild siwu za reduced service days en dias de servicio reducido coHparyeH Horo o6cnyaweaHxa. rwdu"iliyo1Jun0uzwa Ovalleyreg ion altransit I 10 Route24 ~ � I'"'21T1i Weekday�ilia afe J'a Serrrarra Weekday�ilia de J'a Sernarra ■ ■ • Statistics � CW I 4 � V Toward Rec"cls&ViRaff Toward Towne Squake Mail 4 . Square II Towne v� 60MIINUTES y a " ? ° - S- `-' a } � " 9 v w a r '� 9 1 -u 606 2 (13 FY2025 Projected ,:3 ,: g ,:47 Ridership - :r Maple Gran 8-00 3-12 8:22 8-30 8-30 S-39 S'47 S-54 Fairview&Falrvfew 9:00 9:12 9:22 9:30 9:30 9:39 9:47 9:54 10-00 10-12 10-22 10-30 10:34 10-39 10-47 10-54 • 25,000 hoardings 11:00 11:12 11:22 11:30 ' I 11:30 11:39 11A7 11:54 12:00 12:12 12:22 12:30 12:30 12:39 12A7 12:54 MAJOR STOPS 1100 1:12 1:22 1:30 I 1:30 1:39 1:47 1:54 FY2024Changes RECO RD S&VILLAGE 2:00 2:12 2:22 2:30 2:30 2:39 2:47 2:54 3:00 3:12 3:22 3:30 I I 3-30 3:39 3:47 3:54 UST1CK&FIVE MILE I 4:00 4:12 4:22 4:30 4:30 4:39 4:47 4:54 • New Route east west :00 5:12 522 5:30 I I s:30 5:39 5:47 5:54 f MAPLE GROPE&FAIRVIEWAIRVIEW a;oa 6:12 6:22 6:30 6.30 6:39 6:47 6:54 connection between the TOWNE SQUARE MALL 7:00 7:12 7:22 7.30 I � 7bNs Town Square Mail and POINTS OFINTERE'ST Westpark Towne PlazaThe Village in Boise and Ada Count Ben amin Office battdm Forthe time TreasureValleyHospital ts ham major stops Global Community Gardens — U. rs. Meridian Sumrnerwirrd STEM Academy .Read left to right fora hug nip Im I„ ,mot Maple Tree Plaza Recoltk Comba Park 4 A V111290 ■The sLon is shows ever?bus.stop ShULUSt Frontier Elementary adz (DOG ,,..v...r. Llsti.kElerrrentary ti'iOG .Plan pour top byvlemng major stop ..�.�. BU smp , times before and after your Mop P. 65 Itr Transfer em P1N times are BOLDED Los horsios PM aperw•gm i noeauas nine 1200 Muda} .A m ni m:na RI r,�n r,v��. e5t�n an NEGRITA 0 M 6tluwn"uM"PHGM wpm4rmM MIM weji"6 BOLD vdleyrepionoliTansif L)1��t�&np *Trips do not run on `Losautobusesnooperan •noeAKO neotyWe[rennqua aA�a saeai m riranyik siku:a reduced service days en digs de servido reduddo MKPdLLreHHORIofiCnx 6 as ICM nuouma myogmguxwe n H• Ovalleyregionaltransit 1 11 Route40 -.41 4�mi S B&rjive Bity ' I Weekday�Dia de Ea Setliana �Weekday I Dia de la Semana r - Main Street _ Station Blaine Statistics ��� N u Y En C -p C kyy� W C } ��}}yy�y Q N Y d C + O Q i i olf C '0 s y {} Q CL PEAK ONLY - LL7Lir J c_0 r J ~ i Y N +� m a m o 2 2 c•- s a a i= .r• - vo7J rLd1 � m �N a =4y =°'J Om LL� = R m N du Q to 2 5 vw'F/'y■ " LL; f ® wJ l�I 4' ro) 0 0 Lit ',_ Projected Ridership . . r � k 5:46 5:47 6:44 6:21 6:38 6:45 7:04 - 718 7:32 7:42 7:49 0 20,000 boardings � y 6:10 6.17 6:34 6:51 7.09 7:19 4:00 4:14 4:34 4,51 5:06 513 Merldlan 6:40 6:47 7:05 7:22 7:46 7:58 4.30 4A4 5:05 5:22 5:27 5," FY2023 iOverland 0 :16 Overland& ti Black Marlin • 232,242 Passenger MAJOR STOPS �enM'ie 5:30 5A5 6:05 6:21 6:33 6:40 J miles BLAINE&24TH AVE - r HAPPY DAY TRANSIT CENTER - • 14,503 boa rd i ngs - f PM times are BOLDED Las horarios PM ogrm aria noe3AoK n°rne 1200 Muda wa alasi r ni uml no estan en NEGRITA 06eaa BblpepeH47KNppibw wpNSpTOM mida wajioni ni B011XV OVERLAND&BLUE MARLIN $1. r 'Trips do not run on *Los autobuses no oppeeran '00e3AMA He ocywec.6nA=A5 a AH" 'safari haxifanyiiu Mkuza • 58 boardin s Da reducedsenricedays endiasdesenricioreduddo cvrcpaiyeH aroo-fienymweaHwn hudurnairiy°punguxwa g / y MAIN STREET STATION — 1 i + r Barinp.:k c rya � i finnnck • Yl Yl 0 UNIVERSITY&JOYCE `� T F5 Ridership is up 30% g Sp NORTH sr�N y NORTH POINTS OF INTEREST 3' Main Street - ° w Idaho �3. Station 5th FY2024 Changes College of Idaho : •,5 { v r Clearwater Plaza ,' Canyon County HMV Hap Oay -' • Consolidated with CWI Canyon County Campus TransltCenter, cP� CWI Micron Education Center �xar Cleveland i route 43 TenMile Park&Ride " �.2 .&Laster a \ ► fi "ti Meridian Promenade - o� Wahooz&Roaring Springs AJWCeity f &Joycsityr a'P' nusSto T' p$�loyce i &Joyce a • Streamlined andoise City Hall Aaransf is ti s AlAlbertsans Stadium 24th� „ydwna e &Blaine' i' Transterto: Downtown Boise Downtown Boisem Fa''"° i.. AM TripsPM focused for efficiency ralleyregionallransir „ 10mA- i Major �- Toward Boise i l Toward Boise a - Toward Caldwell +' -o-- Toward Caldwell s, Ovalleyregionaltransit I 12 Route 42r ��/ r Tarm11 . , F , � 01�6�5gtfareMall Weekday I Dia de la Semana �Weekday I Uia de Ja se►rtana ■ - * Gee MapleCenter ' _ FIveM �� G7 S — — s N Statistics Fire Mile T as N c AS; uJ a m m C c of sn C '�• F Otarland &Overland_. m (n y o w Cl—rdare . E d L) 64 MINUTES E E n D. ` ss Ease _ m p ` F m LL N N �U �m cvEL F FY2025 Projected Ridership 3 g Locustcrare8'5 4$` ` ` � J l- J l_ J l_ J 34 000 Boa rd i n s 1Adam- -1 - r g Overland &�'' � s,2o 6:31 s:so 7:a8 7,19 7,30 7•.45 s;oo 9:11 9:31 s:aa E:54 Blue Marlin�+ 4.•Overland& 720 7:31 7.50 8108 8:18 830 8.:45 9101 9:13 9:33 9:44 9156 FY2023 Black Marlin 8:20 9131 8150 917 9:29 9:45 9159 10:10 10:30 10:41 10:56 n Mfe 920 933 9150 101D7 1D:17 t629 10'45 10'59 11:10 11:30 11'41 11'56 • 273,729 Passenger miles • ] { I 10:20 10:33 10:50 11:07 11'17 11:29 11'45 11'59 12:10 12e30 12:42 12:56 1', 2e 1 1120 11:33 11:50 12:(Y7 1217 12:29 12A5 1:01 1:12 1:32 1:44 1:56 _ 1Z:20 t2:33 12:50 M7 1:17 1:29 1:45 __ot 212 M32 2:44 2:58 • 24,014 boardings MAJOR STOPS 1:20 1:33 1:50 2:07 2:17 2:29 2:45 3:01 3:12 3:32 3A5 3:59 HAPPY DAY TRANSIT CENTER College of 2:20 2:36 2:55 315 325 3:37 3-�45 4--03 4:15 4:35 4:50 5:05 Western IOaho $� 3:20 3:36 3:.5 4:15 4:25 4:37 4:45 5.05 5:17 9:37 5:52 6:07 • 95 boa rd i ngs/Day Main Campus 3Fth ST S&10TH AYES 1 a:zo 4;37 4;s7 s:17 s:27 5:39 Sa4s 6:00 6:13 6:32 6:47 rot ]• Ridership is up 24% Cvlvl MAIM CAMPUS 5:20 5:37 5:57 6:17 6:27 6:39 6:45 7:00 7:fo 7.29 7:44 7:58 �� --I Midland OVERLAND&BLACK MARLIN 2ndSt& �r Timetable FY2024 Changes 10thAveS,z-1 - > 3rdSt&-- W WE s1 T$ a FIVE MILE&OVERLAND 10th Ave 5 I J T • Added middy tri —__ __. _. P.Read top tohottom for the time y p y abusdepartsfrommajorstops •*' 7 TOWNE SQUARE MALL U Read left to right fora bus trip • Re-routed to serve POINTS OF INTEREST w« �a CWICanyonCountyCampus Happyluay ►Thecrnnrcrshawseverybusstop st4RLls# downtown Nampa ,.�.w..s.� District 208 Shopping Center Transit Center ■Plan ourtri *viewingma orstoP Nampa Civic Center times kfare d after"urstop • All day service between StAlphonsusMedicalCenterNampa Y Ford Idaho Center Nampa, Boise and Wahaaz&Roar1ngSprings sus sto p 1 Five Mile Plaza Paradade9— Meridian Central District Health Transfer m: PM time,are @DLDED Las horaros PM %erm Ana nce3AoK name 1200 Muda wa alaafrl ni u>r na rran.r�.�' " estan en NEGRITA 06eJ)La RUMeneH D MPIPHUM W PHOT4M mida wajioni ni BOLA a vdllayregionaltrartsiF Malaoa Stop "Trirp.Jps do not nun on *Las autobuses no oppeeran -n0e3AKH He ocyuxeciaaflroTrA a qHH 'Safari ha2ifanydld sip,2a reduced service days endfasdeservicioreducido [owpalyeKNom=C ;[H9aHHa. uxxlumailyapungu2wa Ovalleyregionaltransit I 13 Ilan S�,1rwlhq Golf club CnunlryCluh A r AServiceW efflMdrlll bivo f e Gil1144C14 blvac c e ss o ;Uii� �r,. { t Statmistmics i 2 r i}I .-I rp i w FY2 023 � u,NF,N N w u,il��N1 i I I • 31 497 Boardings (Ada County) 31. La+.V1M4 F s 7 r Gall Cluh 3 rw r 5t�,rnii r}+ : 1 gg q 2,995 boardings �'Lrr Mrch*rrY in• � N Fx�lrl•�+�+,r � - N � 11 GX1n I„ • 8 daily boardingsMarldlAri FY2024 Changes I w fFau Oil n A1N W riHnN11}i Nil • Coordinated with Beyond Access • Service area extended to Boise yy4aa11ardRd �4,erl�ntlld �+ FY2024 Acme Service Area ; • All areas continue to be served ,mq�Ngr1 by Access or Beyond Access irretyl.rnr FY2023 Access Service Area Ovalleyregionaltransit I 14 Sand l+o+row Beyond ;� Beyond Access Access z Service ff P}& O } 1 � kotus } i11C�ArXfe Moen Statmistmicsr ff r aq it Gnsnruf FY2023 V 31,497 �r city : . [ illy iSil • Service provided by 4W,1 $ass Mir ¢API Harvest & SHIP Jfw! NV hr.� pq RI + - L{ • Serves health care, """p} nursing homes and Meridian Senior Center `'1 �♦ warunp Nrtwgr FY2024 Ch a nges Na*v4st Transit • Harvest & SHIP service ❑ now provided by �� " Beyond Access SHIP Orrr FW Afeddsn !uI r# • Riders can now travel r1lM � into Canyon County and gryond Atwss � PO kpx, �f�rnr a rf�e northern Ada County and between old Harvest and SHIP areas Ovalleyregionaltransit I 15 • ■ t s ti al - _ _ - H - Y,,..J;, I lri I 1�1 � Za Wer Peak Mcrntyre Lyft Late Night Hidden Spring LLN Service +�! I � I � r. Id Middleton ■ �h'Y 4.4 i 4 � Statistics star n 144, Eag.r 44 I i r I FY2023 I Garden City • 448 boardings • Available 9pm to 6am s Meridian BOisR. • $3 minimum fare Nampa �+' `: oozy Rd Covers 240,388 j o bs at Ya Rpiiry Rrl BOi52 AirpOrral • Supported by fares and f�ge communitygrants c I I b9 I FY2 024 Changes Kings Comer • Expanded to cover Swartz Comer —y Kuna ° more jobs in Meridian Upper Deer ; ,� I _ Legend nrade� I 8�irre Lyfk Late Night I Esri,NASYF%A,USGS,City of Meridian,County of Ada Gsw,Ti brnT r. Garmin,SafeGraph,METIJNASA, • valleyreg ion altransit I USGS,BureauuojLand Management,EPA,NPS,USDA,U'llm Fixed Route IP 2022 2023 # i n Meridian Ridership5,219 5,219 14,358 14,503 5,987 21,905 247014 77841 47397 57280 27703 • Ridership is increasing Specialized • Harvest, SHIP are now - 287024 317497 0 under Beyond Access Rides 2 5520 8770 1912 • Route 30 & Access started (Meridian Oct. 3 of 2022 Medical Transportation) • Lyft were all pick-u ps from Meridian Veteran's • " 98 219 219 the Village and - 8018 7447 7447 represented 10% of all Lyft - 127809 147103 - tri ps Meridian - • - - 8320 8320 NightLyft Late 0 448 45 • I u ntee r D rive r P rogra1,404 17387 - • 96,533 112,887 397693 Ovalleyregionaltransit FY2025 Budget Ovalleyregionaltransit FY2025 Bud et Request Local Cost Allocation Model Assessment Breakdown Type FY2024 FY 2025 Amount General Assessment (calculated by regional share of the population) $83,351 $827019 Service Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your jurisdiction) $586,202 $5257837 Capital Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your jurisdiction) $22,361 $127514 Special Assessment (Negotiated) $179,700 $259,923 Financial Reserve Contribution Total Request $871,614 $880,293 Ovalleyregionaltransit FY2025 Funding Request Request Meridian consider supporting a $880, 293 contribution to public transportation . • Provides basic public transportation in core areas • Leverages federa l f u nd i ng a nd fa re reven ue • Provides Fixed Route • Provides connections within the Region • Growth Potential Ovalleyreg ionaltransit Thankyou . Questions? Elaine Clegg ecleg,@rideVRT. org E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports JUNE 18, 2024 2 AND FY25 BUDGET PRESENTATIONANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL UPDATE CITY OF MERIDIAN JEFF ROSENTHAL, DVM 3 DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES NIXONCRAIG CFO LEANN GILBERG CEO IN FY 2023 4 of pet food to economically challenged families and Meals on Wheels recipientslbsSupplied over 68,000 -Provided veterinary care to 10,418 privately owned pets from predominantly lowSpayed or neutered 9,833 petsReunited 1,464 lost pets with their owners95%–Save Rate for Cats 94%–Save Rate for Dogs 9,636-Total Number of Pets Saved  MERIDIAN 2023 STATS 5 278Number of animals returned to owner1,203Number of animals impounded1,691Number of animals handled326Number of times officers educated vs. citing95Number of Warnings Issued for other Animal Code Violations 53Number of Letters issued for Dog at Large Notices178Number of Letters and Warnings Issued for Barking Dogs18Number of Citations Issued for Animal Code Violations1,321Total Calls (Incident Responses) Hurley 4 days of care Stray brought in by Animal Care & Control 10 years old– UMA & OLLIE Care & Control after owner passed away. Brought in for Protective Custody by Animal both 3 years old– Brody foreign object lodged in intestinessaving surgery to remove -Received life•GRANT FUNDED MEDICAL CARE8 days of care healthSurrendered by owner due to puppy’s 4 months old– Tuna vaccinations, and microchipold enough to adopt out, current tilFoster care for broken leg and growth •GRANT FUNDED MEDICAL CARE6 weeksCurrently in care, anticipated length of stay Stray brought in by Animal Care & Control 22 days old– CITY OF MERIDIAN: ANIMAL CONTROL COSTS/SHARE OF TOTAL COSTS 10 population growthFY24 and FY25 before **$5.17 *$4.82 $4.51 $4.32 $4.00 $4.43 Cost per Capita22.3%20.9%22.8%23.8%Meridian Calls as % of Total Calls1,321 1,542 1,742 1,802 Meridian Calls by Calendar Year5,934 7,376 7,627 7,578 Total Calls by Calendar Year26.1%26.9%26.9%26.4%26.0%24.9%Meridian Population as % of Population Served growthbefore population FY24 and FY25 **138,620 *138,620 138,620 133,470 127,890 117,635 Meridian Population*531,600 *514,410 514,410 504,720 492,340 471,544 Total Population Served21.8%22.2%22.2%22.4%21.1%21.1%Meridian as % Total Contract Amount$717,251$668,767 $625,026 $576,797 $511,903 $520,536 Meridian Contract$3,284,117 $3,012,462 $2,815,432 $2,571,972 $2,427,533 $2,468,489Animal Control Contract Amount BudgetBudget FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20 ANIMAL CONTROL PERSONNEL PAYROLL HISTORY$100K)Director + 86% (still below 78%$19.566.4%$18.38$18.63$17.00$15.00$13.00$11.00Average Veterinary Assistant Rate55%$15.455.5%$14.65$14.55$13.00$12.00$11.00 $10.00Average Animal Care Attendant Rate60%$16.7012.2%$14.89$15.64 $13.50$12.00$11.00$10.45 Front Desk Staff38%$20.0014.3%$17.50$19.00 $17.00$15.00 $12.50$14.50Dispatcher65%$28.007.7%$26.00$27.00$23. 00$20.67$18.00$17.00Animal Control Supervisor64%$23.007.0%$21.50 $21.00 $20.00$17.00$15.00$14.00 Mid Level Animal Control Officer (ACO)54%$20.00 5.3%$19.00 $19.00 $18.00$15.00 $14.00$13.00New Animal Control Officer (ACO)FY25)–(FY20 5 Year Wage InflationBudgetFY25IncreaseFY25 Budgeted BudgetFY24FY24 CurrentFY23FY22FY21FY20AVERAGE RATE/HOUR FY25 ANIMAL CONTROL BUDGET 12 0 0(136,585) Difference to IHSControl contracts.Includes direct Animal Control costs plus portion of Dorman facility expenses allocated to Animal 9.23%3,330,628 3,049,203 2,992,590 Animal Control Allocated Expensesbased on current arrangements and remainder from contracts. Total Contract Revenue plus Redemption, Impound and License Fees retained by IHS. Includes fees 9.23%3,330,628 3,049,203 2,856,005 Animal Control Contract IncomeRedemption, Impound and License Fees retained by IHS. Majority fees go back to municipalities now.26.6%46,511 36,741 40,573 Retained by IHSRedemptions, Impound and License Fees Increase needed to cover higher payroll and operating costs. -Contract Revenue 9.02%3,284,117 3,012,462 2,815,432 Contract IncomeAssumptions/ Variance NotesFY25FY24 to Change Budget FY 25 Budget FY 24 Actual FY 23 BUDGETED PAYROLL COSTS 13 Payroll Expenses = 75% of total Allocated Expenses. Prior year 76%.7.7%2,510,0992,330,655 2,259,412TOTAL PAYROLL EXPENSESrequired for oversight.CFO. Executive level allocation was decreased due to higher level director and expectation of less time Payroll/AP, Accounting Assistant, and Communications and Outreach Manager. Also 20% of CEO and HR, -allocation based on time required to administer Animal Control program. Allocating 33% of 4 FTEs Animal Control assigned and allocated FTEs account for more than 1/3 of total IHS FTEs. Admin FTE 10.4%-211,469 236,062 235,956 Administrationmarket. have increased over 20% and vet tech salaries have increased 15% in the last year and are still trailing wages for all employees to be competitive plus benefit costs continue to increase. Veterinarian salaries FTEs, 1/3 of Volunteer Coordinator and Operation Manager, and allocation of facilities staff. Increasing 40% to IHS. Also includes 7 FTE for shelter animal medical and general care, 60% of Foster Program FY25 includes Shelter Manager plus 17 shelter staff allocated 60% to Animal Control contracts and 6.7%1,201,222 1,125,785 1,191,479Shelter Payroll15%.-required higher rate, officer and other staff wage increases as well of 8wages for all employees to be competitive plus benefit costs continue to increase. Hiring new Director staff/day to handle intake and redemptions. Staffing includes addition of one officer. Increasing FY25 Includes 8 officers (4/day), 1 dispatcher/day, 1 Assistant Supervisor, 1 Director, and 3 front desk 13.3%1,097,408968,808 831,977 Animal Control PersonnelFY24 to FY25Change Budget FY 25 Budget FY 24 FY 23 Actual PAYROLLDETAIL OF ALLOCATED EXPENSES BUDGETED OPERATING COSTS 14 9.2%3,330,6283,049,203 2,992,590TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED TO CONTRACTS14.2%820,529 718,548 733,178 TOTAL ALLOCATED OPERATING EXPENSESIHS outside services costs for benefits, audit, etc. contracting municipalities surveyed. Also 60% of allocated insurance expenses. Plus 33% of cats program, continuing education, uniforms and other misc. costs. Consistent with other Includes allocation for foster care costs, volunteer program, education program, community 0.0%147,297 147,038 129,853Otheryears. equipment, HVAC, boilers, etc. Also includes purchase of new Animal Control vans paid over 3 laundry -anticipated costs. Fluctuates depending on building and equipment repairs needed 60% of estimated Dorman facility costs. Cost broken out separately for PP&E repairs for 16.0%379,653327,381 361,054 Facilities and Equipment Related60% of estimated Dorman facility costs. 20.3%293,579244,129242,271Medical and Other–Supplies FY25FY24 to Change BudgetFY 25 Budget FY 24 FY 23 ActualALLOCATED OPERATING EXPENSES ANIMAL CONTROL TRAINING 15 report writing, policy/procedures–weekly team meetings that include training -BiService training with Ada County Prosecutors (monthly)-InAssigned online continuous education classesLevel 1 and Level 2 ACO Certification–Officers are certified through NACA (National Animal Control Association) 10 weeks–8 –Field Training with an experienced Animal Control Officer (FTO)  THANK YOU 16 QUESTIONS? E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Linder Road Concept Study, Pine to Ustick C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Brian McClure, Community Development Meeting Date: June 18, 2024 Presenter: Brooke Green,ACHD Estimated Time: Topic: Linder Road Concept Study (Pine to Ustick) Recommended Council Action: Listen to ACHD staff update on Linder Road Concept Study. Consider a formal written recommendation to the ACHD Commission after. Background: The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) has completed public engagement for the Linder Road, Pine to Ustick concept study.ACHD staff will be presenting a project status to Council, and would like for City Council to consider providing a follow-up written recommendation to the ACHD Commission.After receiving a similar update from ACHD, the Meridian Transportation Commission recommended a 5-lane option to City Council (with no preference for concept 2 or 3). Currently,the Ada County Master Street Map (MSM) plans for this roadway to be 5-lanes.A construction year is not identified in the current Integrated Five Year Work Plan; instead it is identified as "Future". The forecast used for the transportation analysis was Communities in Motion 2050 model.While the traffic analysis indicated that a 3-lane option could reasonably work,there are a number of additional considerations: • The regional travel demand model (RTDM) is constrained; the City expects to continue growing beyond the allocated population and horizon year. • Forecasts with the RTDM use planning level work, and more nuanced sub-area and specific turning movement analysis may be wrong, in some cases, by years and decades. • The Linder I-84 Overpass and SH-16 expansion are wildcards and may drastically influence regional trip distribution beyond expectations. Other attractors and changes to planned land uses by other agencies may heavily influence programming. The above is not intended as a staff recommendation.What staff would like to reinforce is that 3- lanes may not operate as expected in the foreseeable future, and that tradeoffs accepted and weighted between increased capacity or improved reliability, and the benefits or impacts to community based on each concept, are unlikely to be revisited in the future. The following paragraphs include additional context from City staff. The engagement summaries are additional data points collected that was not presented in the infographic formats previously shared. Landscaping and Remnant Spaces: There are roadway projects throughout the County that have left remnant land. In some cases, access must be provided where it would otherwise not be supported. In others ACHD has retained control where no improvements have been made (bare earth conditions). Property auctioned off by ACHD carries original zoning entitlements and may have no development agreement restrictions. Given the number of property impacts being considered with this project, staff have discussed ensuring that any selected concept contemplates these issues for after widening. Bare- earth on 30-plus remnant parcels would negatively impacts the community. Similarly, properties auctioned later could redevelop in a manner that negatively impact a costly project. ACHD has shared some of these same concerns, and so the challenge is ensuring that when the project goes into construction design,that the status quo is avoided. Engagement Summaries: Materials shared with the public did not break out feedback from participants based on their location; do they live in the study area or outside of it. ACHD shared the following data to help understand participant response perspective. In general, local participants disliked concepts with frontage roads more than those who did not live on the corridor, but prevailing opinion was the same regardless. The public generally liked the standard 5-lane concept the most, and conversely liked the 3-lane concept the least. Respondent perception of roundabouts is a potential influence factor in negative feedback of shared use roads; it's unclear what other factors may have led to a preference for a concept that removed more homes than another 5-lane option. Note: these summaries do not necessarily reflect the opinion of those stakeholders who backout onto Linder, and who would be impacted the most.ACHD staff have been making extra efforts to understand the perspective of those stakeholders with multiple rounds of targeted, 1 on 1 and small group meetings. What do you think of Concept 1 (three-lane design with shared use roads)? Response Live Adjacent Don't Live Live Adjacent Not Adjacent Adjacent Preference Preference Love it. 21 23 9.7% 10.0% Like it. 28 44 13.0% 19.2% Neither like nor dislike. 32 27 14.8% 11.8% Dislike it. 69 76 31.9% 33.2% Strongly dislike it. 66 59 30.6% 25.8% Summary Totals Like 49 67 22.7% 29.3% Indifferent or Unsure 32 27 14.8% 11.8% Dislike 135 135 62.5% 59.0% What do you think of Concept 2 (five-lane design)?) Response Live Adjacent Don't Live Live Adjacent Not Adjacent Adjacent Preference Preference Love it. 70 59 32.3% 25.8% Like it. 68 73 31.3% 31.9% Neither like nor dislike. 30 34 13.8% 14.8% Dislike it. 22 31 10.1% 13.5% Strongly dislike it. 27 32 12.4% 14.0% Summary Totals Okay 138 132 63.6% 57.6% Indifferent 30 34 13.8% 14.8% Dislike 49 63 22.6% 27.5% What do you think of Concept 3 (five-lane design with shared use road)?) Response Live Adjacent Don't Live Live Adjacent Not Adjacent Adjacent Preference Preference Love it. 40 43 18.5% 18.8% Like it. 41 54 19.0% 23.6% Neither like nor dislike. 39 35 18.1% 15.3% Dislike it. 52 48 24.1% 21.0% Strongly dislike it. 44 49 20.4% 21.4% Summary Totals Okay 81 97 37.5% 42.4% Indifferent 39 35 18.1% 15.3% Dislike 96 97 44.4% 42.4% Which Concept do you prefer overall? Response Live Adjacent Don't Live Live Adjacent Not Adjacent Adjacent Preference Preference Concept 1 (3-lane, w/shared 41 48 19.1% 20.9% use) Concept 2 (5-lane, standard) 105 98 48.8% 42.6% Concept 3 (5-lane, w/shared 55 71 25.6% 30.9% use) None of the above 14 13 6.5% 5.7% Linder Rd., Pine to Ustick Brooke Green, Sr. Transportation Planner Information Briefing Concept Design Project Objectives 2 Study Area 3 4 5 NOTE: Shared use road is ONLY between W Sandalwood Dr & W Chateau Dr Concept 1Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 6 Three Lanes w/Shared Use Roadways-Concept 1Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 7 UstickNOTE: This typical section applies for the Linder Rd., Pine to Concept 2Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 8 Standard Five Lanes–Concept 2 Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 9 NOTE: Shared use road is ONLY between W Sandalwood Dr & W Chateau Dr Concept 3Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 10 Five Lane w/Shared Roadway -Concept 3Rd Concept StudyUstickPine Ave to -Linder Road 11 12 During Design Additional Considerations 13 Stormwater facilities •Raised crossing at Sandalwood RAB •issues with remnant parcels. ACHD will work with City of Meridian regarding Deed Restrictions to mitigate •Access management w/Remnant parcels •Address Blight & Remnant Parcels •- 14 Next Steps Questions Public Engagement 16 Overview 17 Next StepsProject Process Public Engagement History Project ProgramingProject Objectives Study Area Residential Shared Street 18 greatly reduced. way fashion because speeds are -Bikes operate in 2Appropriate signage to indicate spaceTraffic calming added to help define shared spacestreetpriority nature of the -curb to reinforce pedestrianTextured or pervious pavement that are flush with E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Master Street Map Changes —Arterial Corridor Preservation Legend ■ ■ C . r■Area of Impact 1_"Meridian City Limits ■ ■ — — Future Roads _ _ ■ ■ ■ MSM Lane Preservation �' '- tx ■ '�*-)/It 5 's CHINDEN `- DMeridian Change ' J 1 L i a MCMILLrAN 1 r t- ' z --------T z r---- , '- i USTICK � ' L O o z U ► --' ► U U 1 ► ; m CHERRY 1 T- T r� `T:D O M M■P-INEO M M ■ In r , III q. �FRANKLIN - ' W w r ---- ' r-- 1_ ■ ----- e0000T OVERLrAI D I P nformation shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City eridian makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of data provided,and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. ' Legend ro Area of Impact =2' Meridian City Limits - - Future Roads MSM Lane Preservation SO IN <3 � 3 NONE 5 >5 7-HINDEN _ ■ Meridian Change ' MCMILL'AN { Z ; _o � ------- y W i , j_■ lJ iUSTICK -- 1 r _� CIE W „ I I W Z , 0- C _-- `-Lj rst 1 - r �. I N J i ■ % , ■ f---O �_T ■ i , 00000001 CHERRY :;-JJ FAIRVIEW C) .-01J6.. Or.. ..OPINE f}, I W ` I-*` ', ■ T---' lJ '_J r, Q W ONONSON 'N ■ r_ F,RANKLIN i_ 7■ kL ---1 I i ---__ L __, --------L OVERLAND PreservationMSM Miles 0 Print Date: • - bmcclure The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City of Meridian makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of the data provided,and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Legend �FRANKLIN rr Area of Impact �y� , r- i 1_,="Meridian City Limits — — Future Roads i-------- -� MSM Lane Preservation u%% ■■ <3 — - r--� ---- r _ 3 l 5 1---- l- >5 Meridian Change i OVERL'ANDA LU U - U m L- LU H , VICTORY LU LU O a ' Ix 0 U AMITY ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -- ■ 46 rL,AAZEL rJ1 MSM , • Date: Miles 0 Print - • - The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City of Meridian makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of � (,E OIDIAN*-- the data provided,and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Legend 9 ' FRANKLIN 1 --� don Area of Impact - -A ��„ �7 _ ' ' 1_,''Meridian City Limits , 'LL'I L---li � Future Roads Q ---a ' -J-i --------4 --- S O --+ ' MSM Lane Preservation r - 9' �J �' --------L � 3 N _- 5 ----- V ------ '• I >5 Meridian Change 14 OVERLAND ---- -_ L 1 i_ - ■ Lf LU J . p ' ---� W dr U VICTORLU J I ■ W„ . W .� ---- AMITY J I ffw 1 , ■ 1 ---r r-- -■ 1 ■ ■ ■■ LAKE HAZEL— -, pow 1 I 1 1 I Z -------` COLUMBIA ■ PreservationMSM Miles 0 Print .. • - - The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City of Meridian makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of � (,E OIDIAN*--- the data provided,and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Master Street Map - Planned Number of Lanes Map z z Ada County N Master Street Map W E St 41, tp Draft February 8, 2024 s ' d vetera The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)created the Master Street '�7o Associa Map in collaboration with Ada County and its six cities to better link Medical C land-use and transportation planning. The Master Street Map is = one of the key elements of the ACHD Transportation and Land Use ` Integration Plan.The Master Street Map is a living document and HOMER RD �r is not binding on future Commissions. BEACON LIGHT RD � LIGHT BEACON RD Idde ring z J vp 4_ r FLOATING FEATHER RD J� j Fort O r�� O ro a O n a SH44 AL,STATE ST s O I � � W zz w ❑ J W I CHINDEN BLVD 0� rison M_C, MILLAN RD A r City F ( Julia Davis Park x USTICK RD N I ` FAIRVIEWAVE EMERALD ST , , FRANKLIN RD os Shaw Mountain OVERLAND RD tY ❑ p ' ❑ VICTORY RD LU ❑ w W o o �y Nrg d +• J 1 '—L " ��m a!ley W Y F a Boise Airport AMITY'RD Aortic LI ill rra 1 t AV�1/ i L m LAKE HAZEL RD z RD w m (I 1 O COLUMBIA RD w �z c F �< Lucky 4� r Peak 1 I Zy o Lake f ' r Gp HUBBARD RD J w ti 1 NT po o ►, �� w,. 11 Three DEER FLAT RD TF Point � ,4t7ofr Mountain Kuna � RFF� � I J KUNA RD RO Q I w I KINGRD 1 8`PCKSCREEy_ I MSM Arterials Right-of-Way Preservation KUNA MORA RD State System ❑ Ad 62 ft I Kuna Butte U) W Slaters 75 78 ft veersL<E a 1 Flat 196- 100 ft t a 120 - 200 ft - a No Planned Improvement and TBD w Caldwell ii���Indipp Cie D r a w ti -ek Mayor Robert E Simison C� I f IDIAN City Council Members: ■�/ John Overton Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault I D n V Luke Cavener Liz Strader June 28, 2023 Alexis Pickering Commission President Ada County Highway District 3775 Adams Street Garden City, ID 83714 RE: McMillan Road Corridor/SH-16 Overpass The City of Meridian was recently made aware of some design changes to the State Highway 16 expansion project in western Ada County.These design changes, negatively impact the ability of ACHD to widen McMillan in the future. SH-16 was previously planned to go under McMillan Road, and now the limited access highway is planned to go over McMillan. Instead of an 80-foot span as currently planned, a 100-foot span over McMillan Road is needed. This 100-foot dimension between MSE walls will accommodate a wider McMillan and avoid an even costlier public retrofit of the overpass in the future. For many years, Meridian has advocated for the preservation of the McMillan Road corridor for 5-travel lanes.While the City understands the constraints with widening McMillan,the fact remains that this section line arterial is a detour route for Chinden and will be a major traffic thoroughfare into the future; steps should be taken now to preserve for its long-term functionality. Some opportunities have already been lost for right-of-way preservation along McMillan,however,the opportunity still exists adjacent to under-developed properties and as part of the SH-16 overpass construction. The City is trying to avoid, as much as possible,having to wipe-out neighborhood landscape buffers and re-build the SH-16 overpass in the future as McMillan will someday be widened. It is not too late to preserve for the future widening of McMillan Road and we ask that ACHD request ITD construct the SH-16 overpass assuming McMillan will be a 5-lane facility someday in the future. Thank you in advance for reconsidering the ultimate cross-section for McMillan and coordinating with ITD to ensure the SH-16 overpass is wide enough over McMillan today and for many years to come. Sincerely, Mayor Robert E. Simison cc: AC14D Commission Bruce Wong,ACHD Director ITD Board Scott Stokes, ITD Director Merrill Sharp, SH-16 Project Manager Ada County N Resolution 2395-"Exhibit A" Master Street Map Amended s°s,. tigYS Master Street Map W E Boise Downtown June 28,2023 S � z The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)created the Master Street �I2� Map in collaboration with Ada County and its six cities to better link ^ qF 1 MSGNrN=z ETF/ sTs land-use and transportation planning.The Master Street Ma Is 1 + P P 9 P > R !, FU-nNTN3 ^ ;s ' one of the key elements of the ACHD Transportation and Land Use ��n ysI""Mn, a Integration Plan.The Master Street Map Is a living document and t ^ e?' I - I;ealas4�o= oti2>p sTs is not binding on future Commissions. i T � s b MSM Arterials > t T T �BSB'-2res4--1'.►-Q� R>`�ROv�'TQ y —State System* 1 �, - I I � 1/�p�Bca+o¢2xf'^sc� '<•p = I>Qqh '��y/"� --State System(New Alignment)* w BL3 BlA=1�BW=2--BL4=3 BLS �p� / >3,,,[[[ ��,">n;. e �� Mobility Arterials ym�NHi H., 'I I w �i �S\�= Mobility Arterials(New Alignment) FL7 r'+a FL3 Mobility Corridor(Under Study) J■■■■'S J g�FL4 b FLS4ryR �\ Residential Motility Arterial S r = w N = i9. r� \ Residential Mobility Arterial(New Alignment) ASH SH4'A:8lSH44-] OSTS1 i ny p!? �q/� 3 \.. 4r4--1 SH44'2 4',A SFk4iiSH_�,�5 � � �Trdnsitional/COfllmercial syq i��NR m My Planned Commercial m o A,_., L'� t �'> m s Residential N ]/ems r, >>q>, / kc� Neighborhood Residential Town Center �GHI-1 m CHI-2 m iHl3 GHI� 'CHIS_JGHIE' GHI-],GHI-BJ-1 9`=�CHI-i00t�2` Sq Industrial 7 y _Y� ArterialRural (No typology designated) y �M-j+W'1MMI=JIWA4-1 MM5-2- MMk6" n MM8 Under Sbtdy � I J��1 p 00 --Proposed Planned Commercial US1+US2N�U53+US-�•USSYUSg=2+US1-2-US8 c OU5103`US11=2 U'14=2Ka J Proposed Residential 1 •- _ ' �i r N U 411 m_ s�, IISTS i Proposed Residential Neighborhood r _'o_'y o H fl CH 1=1 d H2.2 C 1�� g� O U � M$-D Proposed Towncenter C CH3 CHI FV,1-2 F�V2y■�FV3 FjVb FVS��FVB i FV] -NTN-2 `j \-- P12�PI3=2 g PM=3 PI St�`EX1-2 1b EM.L, —o �10 = Proposed RuralIndu is m � �A E%2-2 Proposed Rural �FR1 O FR2 FR3YFR4 FRS-2 FRB i FR7=2 FR8*�FR9�g� O � >> �>y --Proposed Arterial NO I assigned) _ _ 1 Y FRta 2 _ 1 ( typology SH16-R-fi/. yl d' S a� 1 1 RN1-RH2-1 Bq I 9 s PCBr-1 rf --Proposed Under Study 1oMi-s J r _�__i+7-'"y,�+^__n_�m lj 2•AYMB���vIAM-]-�o_yyyyyy,+���A)IM B�uLI�AM9���•1�I`�� I _I-- m,p�s �d2 0 > MSM Collectors eov1~OV42ova-I ovs ovao �o AP-OVER -1 v � OV13 - —Commercial ; —Industria =VI1-m-V12­,g-U13+V14�I3.2-VI8 � IB�'VI9'VI10=1LV1.VIi2tp— —Residential --, oo --Town center O Traditional Neighborhood �o 10-AM11 M12 RuralA +- 34 Np �Wt=y`GG —Collector(No typology designated) o LH1- LH2-�LH3 # LH4F�LFIBr°JLH&2�LH] LIH8.t1�4LH9"1.[yfo W1'1 Q --proposed Commercial** II W g LH11-Xr, 10 I T 1.8!~ $ -proposed InduSVia** g - I- - mRn-5H2- g �•'' T l 1 5 GOLi�GOL2�COL3�COL4�1♦COLS1.fL81EOV�� }L-- 2+ r l a mN rc --Proposed Residential** m ;yT I �1' Y F T T l : `\ m��1GL�T --Pro Town Center** !- y 1J1 ,f'h�u�_I x �j, a [y13-k T 1 N.`� 4 I I J• -Proper Traditional Neighborhood— �HBi-1�HBiS�{}HBN-2HB3 HB4y-4 .I' HB]�H. Ate, U I_I-y-I- t `��1`tz} ®G0.q > + 4 Proposed Ru21** BF11 OF2-1<DF31i�DF4 DF5K:�GFB "'�C] 'UO j� MEMRi -proposed Cd eCNr(NO typology Designated)** 11 11 •. MSM Roundabouts*** -tI- t �-T --� —Single Lane K.I nK03 1-2 KU5I-14-KUAJKU7=2-2 KU8 Kul 9i T,��`_5 Multi-lane —Dual lane KG11U-KZrKG3=J KG4-x S'�/6�J'�KG6rKG7- KG8-X RK KG10+KG11--KG12>J —Triple Lane I O 3 XT W Y �- 1> KMRi� m V KMR2 rn Ste& KMR3T *KMR41— KMRS- - KI.iR6 `Roadways identified as state facilities are only included to show L. +t 4-+4-T r.,_ LL $ /� the transportation system as a whole;planning for these corridors + t t t r l �eR=mil is underjurisdicton of the Idaho Transportation Department. L i 1 f t t T 1'T- "Alignments of roadways identified as proposed collectors are subject to development review. F t—t}1 "`Roundabouts locations may be adjusted to accommodate topographic constraints. Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project 10MI-1 10MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 10MI-2 10MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 10MI-3 10MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 10MI-4 10MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 10MI-5 10MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 10MI-6 110MILE INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* NPI* 15TH-DNTN-1 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-10 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 15TH-DNTN-11 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 15TH-DNTN-12 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 15TH-DNTN-2 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-3 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-4 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-5 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-6 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-7 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 15TH-DNTN-8 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 15TH-DNTN-9 15TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 16TH-DNTN-1 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 36TH-DNTN-2 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 16TH-DNTN-3 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 16TH-DNTN-4 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 16TH-DNTN-5 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 16TH-DNTN-6 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 16TH-DNTN-7 16TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 16TH-DNTN-8 36TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 36TH-DNTN-9 16TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 27TH-1 27TH ST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 27TH-2 27TH ST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 27TH-3 27TH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 Restriping,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 27TH-4 27TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 Restriping,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 27TH-5 27TH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 Restriping,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 36-CW-NC 36TH-CARTWRIGHT Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 2 NPI' 62 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan CONNECTION 36TH-1 36TH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 36TH-2 36TH ST Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan 36TH-3 36TH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-1 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-2 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-3 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-4 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-5 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-6 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-7 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 5TH-DNTN-8 STH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-1 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-2 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-3 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI' 2 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-4 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-5 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI' 3 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-6 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-7 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 6TH-DNTN-8 6TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* STH-DNTN BTH ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 9TH-DNTN-1 9TH ST Mobility Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-2 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-3 9TH ST ITowncenter Arterial 4 1 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 1 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project 9TH-DNTN4 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-5 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-6 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-7 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* 9TH-DNTN-8 9TH ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* AB-DNTN JAVENUEB Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AER AERIE LN To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD AER-X Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD inks AM3 AMITY RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 80,81,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM10 AMITY ROAD Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 South Meridian Transportation Plan AM10-X AMITY RD-EXTENSION Industrial Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 AM11 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM11-X AMTY RD-EXTENSION Industrial Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 AM12 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM12 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 A102-1 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM2-2 AMITY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM3-1 AMITY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,72,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM3-2 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,72,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM4-1 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 79,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM4-2 AMITY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 73,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM5-1 AMITY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 73,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM5-2 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 74,78,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM6 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 78,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AM7 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 AMR AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AM9 AMITY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AMBLVDI AMERICANA BLVD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AMBLVD1 AMERICANA BLVD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AMBLVD2 AMERICANA BLVD Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AMX-X AMYX LN-EXTENTION Towncenter Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AIRPORT-OVERLAND Subject to development,Roadway to Bikeway AP-OVER-EXT-1 EXTENSION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Master Plan:Level 2 Airport-Overland Study AP-OVER-EXT-2 AIRPORT-OVERLAND Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Subject to development,Roadway to Bikeway Airport-Overland Study EXTENSION Master Plan:Level 2 AP-OVER-EXT-3 AIRPORT-OVERLAND Planned Commercial Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Subject to development,Roadway to Bikeway Airport-Overland Study EXTENSION Master Plan:Level 2 APP APPLE ST Industrial Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 APS1 APPLE ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AV!-! AVALON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 3 5 87 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 AVI-2 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* NPI* BA1 BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BA2 BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BA3 BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BA3 BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BA4 BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BAS BOISE AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: BBR3-1 BOGUS BASIN RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leven BBR1-2 BOGUS BASIN RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 1 NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 2 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project BBR2 BOGUS BASIN RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Hackberry Ranch Subdivision:See Commission notes BBR3 BOGUS BASIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BBR4 BOGUS BASIN RD Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Pathways:Comment 26,39,Ten Mile BC10-1 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Interchange Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Meridian Pathways:Comment 26,39,TenMile SC10-2 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Interchange Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BCll BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 26,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC1-1 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 New Alignment) BC12 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 11,15,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC12 Kura Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 New Alignment) BC13 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 4,11,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC1-3 BLACK CAT RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BC2 BLACK CAT RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level BC3 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level BC4 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level BC5 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 306-1 BLACK CAT RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 82,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 1306-2 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 82,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC7 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 68,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC8-1 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level3 South Meridian Transportation Plan 3C8-2 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South Meridian Transportation Plan BC9-1 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 46,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BC9-2 BLACK CAT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 39,40,46,Roadway South Meridian Transportation Plan to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 BCNSTI BEACON ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BCNST2 BEACON ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level BL3-1 BEACON LIGHT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 313-2 BEACON LIGHT RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Updated 06/28/2023.In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect the planned number of BL2 BEACON LIGHT RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 TBD 100 lanes and right of way preservation for a proposed five-lane Beacon Light Road from SH16 to Linder Rd.Roadway to Bikeways Master Plan: Level Updated 06/28/2023.In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect the planned number of BL3 BEACON LIGHT RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 TBD 100 lanes and right of way preservation for a proposed five-lane Beacon Light Road from SH16 to Linder Rd.Roadway to Bikeways Master Plan: Level3 NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 3 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect that ACHD will no longer preserve right of way for a BL4-1 BEACON LIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 3 3 TBD 96 proposed five-lane Beacon Light Road but will instead preserve 96 feet of right of way,only with developmen,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Level 3 In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect that ACHD will no longer preserve right of way for a 314-2 BEACON LIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 3 3 TBD 96 proposed five-lane Beacon Light Road but will instead preserve 96 feet of right of way,only with developmen,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Level 3 In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect that ACHD will no longer preserve right of way for a BL4-3 BEACON LIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 3 3 TBD 96 proposed five-lane Beacon Light Road but will instead preserve 96 feet of right of way,only with developmen,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Level 3 In accordance with the Commission's direction and intent,the Master Street Map will reflect that ACHD will no longer preserve right of way for a BL5 BEACON LIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 3 3 TBD 96 proposed five-one Beacon Ligh t Roa u[will instead preserve 96 feet of right of way,only with developmen,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Level 3 BR BAKER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* BRAS BRIDGE AVE Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 IN 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BRDWY BROADWAY AVE Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 BRDWV-1 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-10 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-11 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-12 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-13 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-14 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-15 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-2 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-3 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-4 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-5 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-6 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-7 BROADWAV STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWV-8 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* BRDWY-9 BROADWAY STATE NFI* NPI* B51 BROOKESIDE LN Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 2 NPI* 62 B52 BROOKESIDE LN Towncenter Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 2 NPI* 62 BS3 BROOKESIDE LN Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 2 NPI* 62 B54-1 BROOKESIDE LN Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 BS4-2 BROOKESIDE LN Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* B56 BROOKESIDE LN Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 856-1 BROOKESIDE LN To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 4 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project B56-2 BROOKESIDE LN To Be Decided 0 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD BS6-X Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD nks BW1 BOWN WAY Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 2 CAS CAN ADA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CA2 CAN ADA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 3 CARS CAN ADA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwa to Bikewa Master Plan:Level CAR2 CAN ADA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 CAR2 CAN ADA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikewa Master Plan:Level CBI-DNTN-1 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-5 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB2-DNTN2 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CB2-DNTN-3 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CB2-DNTN4 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-1 CAPITOL BLVD Mobility Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-2 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-3 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-4 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB3-DNTN-5 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CB4-DNTN-1 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 1 NFI* 1 NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CB4-DNTN-2 CAPITOL BLVD Towncenter Arterial 1 NFI* I NPI* NPI* Capital Boulevard Streetscape Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CH1-1 CHERRYLN Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 25,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CH1-2 CHERRYLN Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI" 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 26,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CH2 CHERRYLN Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 26,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CH3 CHERRYLN Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 27 CH3 CHERRYLN Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 27 CH3 CHERRYLN Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 27 CH4 CHERRYLN Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy CHI-1 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-10 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-11 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-12 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-13 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-14 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-15 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-16 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-17 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-18 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-19 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-2 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-20 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level CHI-21 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-22 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-3 CHINDEN BLVD STATE N I F* NPI* CH-4 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CH-5 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* NFI":No Funded Improvement NPI":No Planned Improvement 5 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project CHI-6 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI' CHI-7 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHI-8 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI' NPI' CHI-9 CHINDEN BLVD STATE NFI* NPI* CHPRL2 CHAPPARRALRD Rural Arterial 2 NFI' 2 NPI* TBD CHPRL2-X Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD inks CL10 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CL11-1 CLOVERDALE RD Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 93 1 96 1 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL11-2 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL11-2 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level CL11-3 CLOVERDALE RD Towncenter Arterial 5 5 5 88 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL32-1 CLOVERDALE RD Towncenter Arterial 5 5 5 88 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL12-2 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL32-3 CLOVERDALE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL13-1 CLOVERDALE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CL13-2 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level CL13-2 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CLl-4 CLOVERDALE RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 100 Roadway tO Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CL14-1 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan CL14-2 CLOVERDALE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan CL2 CLOVERDALE RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study CL3 CLOVERDALE RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CL4 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NP* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Stud CL5 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CL6 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study CL7 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CLS CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study CL8 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CL8 CLOVERDALE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study CL9 CLOVE RDA LE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CLBA COLUMBIA Residential Arterial 2 NFI' 2 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CO10-1 COLE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CO10-2 COLE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study C011-1 COLE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CO11-2 COLE RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI' 75 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study C012 COLE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study CO12 COLE RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 75 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study C013-1 COLE RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study CO13-2 COLE RD Industrial Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 C014-1 COLE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI' NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CO14-2 COLE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 C014-3 COLE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 C014-4 COLERD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan,Level 2 C015-1 COLE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CO15-2 COLERD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 C015-3 COLE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 4 NFI' 4 NPI* NPI* Level 2 from Fairview to Maxwell CO16-1 COLE RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Level 2 from Wilshire to Fairview C016-2 COLE RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* CO17-1 COLE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level C017-2 COLE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* CO4 COLE RD Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* C05 COLS RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CO6 COLE RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study C07 COLE RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study CO7-NC COLE RD-NEW CONNECTION Rural Arwrial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CO8-NC COLE RD-NEW CONNECTION Neighborhood Residentiall Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study CO9 ICOLE RD I Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 6 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project C09-NC COLE RD-NEW CONNECTION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI' 3 NPI' 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study CO-AMX-NC COLE RD-AMYX EXTENTION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study COLT COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COL2 COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COL3 ICOLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COL3 COLUMBIA RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Roadw ay to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COL4-1 COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan C014-1 COLUMBIA RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan COL4-2 COLUMBIA RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan C015-1 COLUMBIA RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan CO15-2 COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan COLS COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 95,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COL7 COLUMBIA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 95,96,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CRI CURTIS RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan,Level 2 CR2 CURTIS RD Planned Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CR2 CURTIS RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 CR3 CURTIS RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CR4-1 CURTIS RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Level 2 from Plymouth to Fairview,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 CR4-2 CURTIS RD Residential Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Ada County Request:Include wide shoulders for CWl CARTWRIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* bike/ped,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan 2 Ada County Request:Include wide shoulders for CW1 CARTWRIGHT RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI' 2 NPI* NPI' bike/ped,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan 2 CW-BBR-NC3 CARTWRIGHT-BOGUS BASIN Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 2 NPI* 62 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan ROAD CONNECTION DC1 DRY CREEK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DC2 DRY CREEK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DC3 DRY CREEK RD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 DC4 DRY CREEK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF3 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level DF2-1 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF2-2 DEER FLAT RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF3-1 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level DF3-2 DEER FLAT RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF3-3 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level DF3-4 DEER FLAT RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF4 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 DF4 DEER FLAT RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 DF5 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' S NPI* S00 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 DF5 DEER FLAT RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 DF6 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 DF6 DEER FLAT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Roadway width for Eagle Rd from Plaza Drive north to State Street should be determined by the Eagle Road and State Street Intersection Concept Study- EA30-1 EAGLE RD Towncenter Arterial 3 4 4 88** 96 design of the Eagle Rd and State Street Quadrant Alternative intersection,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Level 2 Roadway width for Eagle Rd from State Street to EA10-2 EAGLE RD Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Idaho Street should be determined by the design EagleRoadandStateStreetlntersectlOnConceptStudy- of the Eagle Rd and State Street intersection, Quadrant Alternative Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EA31 EAGLE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 EA EAGLE RD To Be Decided 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level EA3-5 I EAGLE RD IRural Arterial 2 1 NFI* 3 NPI* 100 Road way to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 7 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project EA2 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study EA3 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study EA4 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study EAS-1 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study EA5-2 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 95,Roadway to South West Boise Study Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EA6 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 94,95,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EA7 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 85,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EAS EAGLE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 77,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EA9-1 EAGLE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 66,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EA9-2 EAGLE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan EA9-3 EAGLE RD Planned Commercial Arterial S NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 57,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EMERA3 EMERALD ST Industrial Arterial 3 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA2 EMERALD ST Industrial Arterial 3 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA3-1 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA3-2 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA4-1 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA4-2 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA4-3 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA4-4 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 88 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA5-1 EMERALD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA5-2 EMERALD ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EMERA6-1 EMERALD ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EMERA6-2 EMERALD ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EMERA6-3 EMERALD ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 ERl ECKERT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ER1 ECKERT RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ES3 EISENMAN RD Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 ES2-X EISENMAN RD-EXTENTION Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EW EDGEWOOD RD Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EX1-1 EXECUTIVE DR Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EX3-2 EXECUTIVE DR Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EX2-1 EXECUTIVE DR Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 EX2-2 EXECUTIVE DR Industrial Arterial 3 3 3 69 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 EX2-3 EXECUTIVE DR Industrial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FH-NL1 Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD links FH-NL2 Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD links FH-NL3 Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD links FH-NL4 Foothills recommended street To Be Decided 0 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD Inks FL1 FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FLl FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FLl FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FLS FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FLl FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FLl-C FLOATING FEATHER- Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level CONNECTION FLOATFL2-C CONN NG CTION HER- Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CONNECTION FL3 FLOATING FEATHER RD I Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FL4 FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FL4 FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FLS FLOATING FEATHER RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 8 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project FM30-1 FIVEMILE RD Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 93 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM10-2 FIVEMILE RD Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 93 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM30-3 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM10-3 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM31 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FMSS IFIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM31 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FMSS FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FM3-1 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Neighborhood Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI' TBD New Alignment) FM1-2 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Neighborhood Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level New Alignment) FM12-1 FIVEMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM12-2 FIVEMILE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 5 5 87 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level FM33 FIVEMILE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan FM1-3 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Neighborhood Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level New Alignment) FM3-4 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM1-5 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM2 FIVEMILE-NEW CONNECTION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM3 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FM4-1 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study FM4-2 FIVEMILE RD Neighborhood Residentiall Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study FM4-3 FIVEMILE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study FM5-1 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan;Level 2 South West Boise Study FM5-1 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study FM5-1 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study FM5-2 FIVEMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study FM6 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study FM6-1 FIVEMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 South West Boise Study FM7-2 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study FM8 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 FM9-1 FIVEMILE RD Towncenter Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FM9-2 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FM9-3 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FM9-4 FIVEMILE RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FORT FORREY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FRl FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 38,39,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FR10-1 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR10-2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI* NPI* FR10-3 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR10-4 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI' 5 NPI* NPI* FR10-5 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR11-1 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR11-2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 5 NPI* 120 FR12 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 5 NPI* 120 FR2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 39,41,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FR3 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 41,42,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FR3 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment41,42,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 FR4 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 42 FR5-1 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* FR5-2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 44,45 FR5-2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 44,45 FR6 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 45 FR7-1 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR7-2 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI- NFI ':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 9 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project FR8 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FR9 FRANKLIN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* FRO-1 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-10 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-11 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-2 IFRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-3 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-4 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-5 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-6 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-7 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-8 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FRO-9 FRONTST STATE NFI* NPI* FS EFRONT ST Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 FT-DNTN FORTST Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV1-1 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 8 8 8 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management egy FV1-2 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Meridian Pathways:Comment 29,Roadway to Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV2 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Meridian Pathways:Comment 30,Roadway to Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV3 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan;Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy FV4 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy FV5 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy FV6 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy FV7 FAIRVIEWAVE Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 1 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy FV9-1 FAIRVIEWAVE Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 120 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV9-2 FAIRVIEWAVE Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV9-3 FAIRVIEWAVE Trasitional/CommercialArterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV-DNTN-1 FAIRVIEWAVE Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV-DNTN-2 FAIRVIEWAVE Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FV-DNTN-3 FAIRVIEWAVE Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 3 FW1-1 FEDERAL WAY Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FW1-1 FEDERAL WAY Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 3 FW1-2 FEDERALWAY Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FW2 FEDERAL WAY Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 FW3 FEDERAL WAY Mobility Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadwa to Bikeway Master Plan:Level FW3 FEDERAL WAY Mobility Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 GAL GARRETT ST Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level GD2-1 GODDARD RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 GH1 GREENHURST RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 GH2 GREEN HURST RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 GOW3-1 GOWENRD Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 COW 1-2 GOWENRD Industrial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Lake Hazel Extension-Gowen Road GOW1-3 GOWEN RD Industrial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Lake Hazel Extension-Gowen Road GR1 GARYLN Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 GW2 GLENWOOD ST Trasitional/CommercialArterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Road way to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 HAYS-DNTN-1 HAYSST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leven HAYS-DNTN-2 HAYSST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* HB1-1 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(NEW) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 New Alignment) 11133-2 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(NEW) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level New Alignment) H131-3 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(NEW) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 New Alignment) 11131-4 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(NEW) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 New Alignment) 1131-5 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 �HHEB21 B3-6 HUBBARD RD Transitional/CommercialArterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bike way Master Plan:Level 2 HU BBARD RD Transitional/CommercialArterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to BikewayMaster Plan:Level2 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 B2-3 HUBBARD RD Transitional/CommercialArterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 10 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project HB3 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 HB3 HUBBARD RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 HB3 HUBBARD RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI' 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Leval HB4 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 11134 HUBBARD RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 HB5 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 11136 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study HB6-X HUBBARD EXTENSION-1 Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study 11137 HUBBARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study HB8 HUBBARD EXTENSION-2 Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study HB8-x HUBBARD EXTENSION-2 Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study HBLVD HARRISON BLVD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* HELRD HEALEY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* No Sidewalk between Boise and Boise River, Boise Ranch Subdivision:See Commission notes Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 HR3-1 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HRl-2 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HR3-3 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HRl-3 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HR3-4 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HRl-5 HILL RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 5 5 87 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan HR3-6 HILL RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 66 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 1-84-1-184 1-84/1-184 INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* 1-84-1-184 1-84/1-184 INTERSTATE NFI* NPI* 1-84-1-184 1-84/1-184 INTERSTATE NFI* NP* IDAH-DNTN-1 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-10 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-11 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-12 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-13 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-14 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-15 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 IDAH-DNTN-16 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 IDAH-DNTN-2 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' IDAH-DNTN-3 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-4 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' IDAH-DNTN-5 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-6 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' IDAH-DNTN-7 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-8 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* IDAH-DNTN-9 IDAHO ST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-1 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leve12 JEFF-DNTN-10 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-11 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-12 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-13 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-14 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-15 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-16 IEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-17 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* JEFF-DNTN-2 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-3 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leve12 JEFF-DNTN-4 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 1EFF-DNTN-5 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leve12 EFF-DNTN-6 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level JEFF-DNTN-7 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-8 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 JEFF-DNTN-9 JEFFERSON ST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Leve12 KG3 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG10 KING ROAD-NEW Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CONNECTION NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 11 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project KGSS KING ROAD-NEW Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CONNECTION KG12 KING ROAD-NEW Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CONNECTION KG2 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG3 IKING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG4 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG5-1 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KGS-2 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG6 KING RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG7 KING RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KG8-X KING RD-NEW CONNECTION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level KG9-X KING ROAD-NEW Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 CONNECTION KMR1 KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 0 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 KMR2 KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 0 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 No bike lane between McDermott and Black Cat, Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KMR3 KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 2 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KMR4 KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 2 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KMRS KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 2 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KMR6 KUNA-MORA RD Mobility Corridor(Under Study) 2 NFI* 7 NPI* 200 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KN3 KOOTENAI ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KUL KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leval 2 KU2_3 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 KU2_2 KUNA RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level KU3 AVALON ST Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan;Level 2 KUS-1 KUNA RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU5-2 KUNA RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU6 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU7-1 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU7-2-1 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU7-2-2 Kuna Comprehensive Plan( Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level New Alignment) KU7-3 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU8 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU9 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 KU9 KUNA RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LA LINCOLN AVE Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LGl LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 LG10-1 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 97 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG10-2 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 23,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG31-1 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan,Level 2 LG11-2 LOCUST GROVE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level LG11-3 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG12 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI' 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG12 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LG12 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LG12 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LG3-X LOCUST GROVE EXTENTION Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG2 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG2-X LOCUST GROVE EXTENTION Rural Arterial IN 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG3 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG4 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 90,93,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 12 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project LGS LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 78,84,94,Roadway South Meridian Transportation Plan to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG6 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 75,76,78,Roadway South Meridian Transportation Plan to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LG7 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 64,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG8-1 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan L38-2 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 45,49,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG8-2 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI' NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 45,49,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 L39-1 LOCUST GROVE RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 45,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LG9-2 LOCUST GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI' S NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 35,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LH1 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment86,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH10 LAKE HAZEL RD Residential Mobility Arterial 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study LH11-X LAKE HAZEL-EXTENSION ResidentialMobility Arterial(New) 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study LH12-X LAKE HAZEL EXTENSION Residential Mobility Arterial(New) 0 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH13-X LAKE HAZEL-EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 5 5 93 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level Lake Hazel Extension-Gowen Road;South West Boise Study LH14-X LAKE HAZEL-EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Lake Hazel Extension-Gowen Road LH2 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 NFI' S NPI' 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment87,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH3 LAKE HAZEL RD Residential Mobility Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI' 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 87,88,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH4 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 88,89,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH5-1 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 89,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH5-2 LAKE HAZEL RD Mobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 90,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH6-1 LAKE HAZEL RD Mobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 90,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH6-2 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 91,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level LH7 LAKE HAZEL RD Residential Mobility Arterial 2 5 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 92,Roadwayto South West Boise Study;South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LH8 LAKE HAZEL RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study LH9 LAKE HAZEL RD Residential Mobility Arterial 3 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study LH-O-NC LAKE HAZEL TO ORCHARD Mobility Arterial(New) 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study CONNECTION L110 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 1.I10 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI30 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI10 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 1_I3-1 LINDER RD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 5 87 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 1_I31-1 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 17,20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Llll-1 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 17,20,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LISS-2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto BikewayMaster Plan:Level 2 LIl-2 LINDER RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roady to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LIS-2 LINDER RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* wa100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level LI32-1 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 13 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project LI32-2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment6,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI33 LINDER RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 7 7 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Multi- Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan;Linder Rd,Chinden Use Pathway 10' Blvd to SH44 Concept Study(Adopted July 2019) LI34 LINDER RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI35 ILINDER RD Residential Mobility Arterial 2 5 5 93 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI36 LINDER RD ResidentialMobility Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 LI2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI2 LINDER RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level3 LI2 LINDER RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 L13 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI3 LINDER RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI3 LINDER RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI4 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 88,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI4 LINDER RD Transitional/Commerciall Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 88,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI5 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 83,88,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI6 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 70,71,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI7 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 54,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI8-1 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 0 5 5 97 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South Meridian Transportation Plan LI8-2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 42,43,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 LI9-1 LINDER RD Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 32,42,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI9-1 LINDER RD Industrial Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 32,42,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI9-2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 32,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LI9-2 LINDER RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 32,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LT3-1 LATAH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level LT3-2 LATAH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 LT2-1 LATAH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level LT2-2 LATAH ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level MDMT3 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT10 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT2 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT3 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT4 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT5-1 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT5-2 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 MDMT6 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT7 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMTB MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDMT9 MCDERMOTT Mobility Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MDWD MEADOWLAND DR Industrial Arterial 3 3 3 69 76 MEMRI MEMORY RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 MEMR2 MEMORY RD To Be Decided 4 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD MEMR2 MEMORY RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD MEMR2 MEMORY RD To Be Decided 4 NFI* 5 NPI* TBD MG1 MAPLE GROVE RD Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study MG10-1 MAPLE GROVE RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MG10-2 MAPLE GROVE RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MGll MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 2 MGl1 MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level MG11 MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level MG12-1 MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 14 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project MG12-1 MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MG12-2 MAPLE GROVE RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NPI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MG13 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MG1-NC MAPLE GROVE RD-NEW Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leval 2 CONNECTION MG2 MAPLE GROVE RD Rural Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study MG2-X MAPLE GROVE EXTENSION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadwa to Bikewa Master Plan:Level 2 MG3-X MAPLE GROVE EXTENSION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study MG4-X MAPLE GROVE EXTENSION Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study MG5 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study MG6 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* S00 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study MG7 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study MG7 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study MG8 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South West Boise Study NI MAPLE GROVE RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Leven Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MG9-2 MAPLE GROVE RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI' NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM3 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 8,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 M1030-1 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 4 4 4 90 96 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM10-2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 4 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM10-3 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 96 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM11_1 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 3 3 3 68 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM11-2 MCMILLAN RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 3 3 66 74 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan MM2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 9,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 9,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM3-1 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 9,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM3-2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 10,11,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM3-2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 10,11,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM4-1 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 11,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NI MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 11,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 M104-2 MCMILLAN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level INI MCMILLAN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Pl22:Le5 3 MM5-2 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Leve MM6 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MM7 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MM8 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 13,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MM9-1 MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NI MCMILLAN RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MR1 MERIDIAN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MRS MERIDIAN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level MR2 MERIDIAN RD Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level MR3 MERIDIAN RD Towncenter Arterial 5 5 5 95 96 A MR4 MERIDIAN RD Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 74 A MRS MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 22,28,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MRS MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 22,28,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MRS MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 22,28,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MRS MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 E Level 2 from Ashby to Ustick,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MRS IMERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 L;78 ; E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 15 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project MR7 MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 7,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MR7 MERIDIAN RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 7,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MSC-CSSOVR M ERIDIAN SPLIT CORRI DOR- Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 CSSOVER MS-DNTN-1 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI' NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MS-DNTN-10 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' MS-DNTN-11 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI' 3 NPI* NPI' MS-DNTN-12 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-13 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* 75 MS-DNTN-14 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-15 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-16 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-17 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-2 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MS-DNTN-3 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN4 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-5 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-6 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI' 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-7 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-8 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI' 3 NPI* NPI* MS-DNTN-9 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* MS-K1 MAINST Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MS-K3 MAINST Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MS-MS MAINST Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 MS-102-1 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* A Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MS-M2-2 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 1 NFI* 1 NPI* NPI* A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level l Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MS-102-3 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level l Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MS-102-3 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level l Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MS-M3-1 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level l Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MS-103-2 MAINST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI' NPI* A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level l Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan MVl MOUNTAIN VIEW DR Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level MW1-1 MILWAU KEE ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* Road way to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MWl-2 MILWAUKEE ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan,Level 2 MW2 MILWAU KEE ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MW2 MILWAUKEE ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 MW2 MILWAU KEE ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 2 MW3 MILWAUKEE ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 MYR-1 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-10 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-11 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-3 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-4 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-5 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-6 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-7 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-8 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* MYR-9 MYRTLE ST STATE NFI* NPI* NHl NEW HOPE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 NH2-C NEW HOPE RD-CONNECTION Residential Arterial(New) 2 NFI* 3 NPI' 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 16 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project After its construction,this section will be reclassify ORl ORCHARDST Industrial Arterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 124 to a collector,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Orchard Realignment Study Level2 0132-1 ORCHARDST INTERSTATE 8 NFI' 8 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OR2-2 ORCHARD ST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* OR2-2 JORCHARDST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OR2-3 ORCHARDST Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* OR3 ORCHARDST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* OR4 ORCHARDST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* OR5 ORCHARDST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OR5 ORCHARDST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* OR6 ORCHARDST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OR6 ORCHARDST Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OST.Sl STATEST Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OST.S3 STATE ST Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OST.Sl STATEST Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 Roadway width for State Street from Olde Park Place to 2nd Street should be determined by the OST.S2 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* design of the Eagle Rd and State Street intersection,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan: Leve12 OST.S3 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OV10-1 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study OV30-2 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OVSS OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV12 OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commerci al Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV13 OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV14 OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV15-1 OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OVIS-2 OVERLAND RD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI' 3 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OV3-1 OVERLAND RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 53,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OV3-1 OVERLAND RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 53,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 OV3-2 OVERLAND RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan OV4 OVERLAND RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 55,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Meridian Pathways:Comment 55,56,ROWPre OV5 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* needs to take into account Idaho Power strict South Meridian Transportation Plan easement,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Meridian Pathways:Comment 57,ROWPre needs OV6 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 to take into account Idaho Power strict easement, South Meridian Transportation Plan Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV7-1 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Meridian Pathways:Comment 57,Roadway to South West Boise Study;South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV7-2 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study;South Meridian Transportation Plan OV8 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 OV9 OVERLAND RD Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 7 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study OX-1 ORCHARD EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study OX-1 ORCHARD EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study OX-2 ORCHARD EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 2 5 5 117 124 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level South West Boise Study OX-3 ORCHARD EXTENSION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 5 5 117 124 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level3 South West Boise Study;Orchard Street Realignment Study (Adopted January 2020) PAL1-1 PALMER LN Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PAL1-2 PALMERLN Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PB3 PARKBLVD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PCB1 PARKCENTER BLVD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI' PCB1 PARKCENTERBLVD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* PCB2-1 PARKCENTER BLVD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* Level Baybrook to Mallard NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 17 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project PCB2-2 PARKCENTER BLVD Trasitional/Commercial Arterial 6 NFI* 6 NPI* NPI* PCB3 PARKCENTER BLVD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI2 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 31,32,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI3-1 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 78 E Meridian Pathways:Comment 32,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI3-2 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 78 A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan PI3-3 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI' 2 NPI* 78 A Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan PI4-1 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* A Meridian Pathways:Comment 33,Roadway to Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI4-2 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan PI4-3 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan PI4-3 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 3 3 3 NPI* NPI* E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan PI4-4 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 3 3 3 NPI' NPI* E Meridian Pathways:Comment 34,Roadway to Meridian Downtown Street Cross-Section Master Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI5-1 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 36,37,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PI5-2 PINE AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PKCNTR-1 PARKCENTER BLVD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikewa Master Plan:Level 2 PKCNTR-2 PARKCENTER BLVD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 PKCNTR-3 PARKCENTER BLVD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 PLMER-CE PARKLN Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PLMR-CS PLUMMER RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PLRD-CS POLLARD RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PR3 PROTEST RD Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PR2 BEACON ST Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PRIES PRESIDENT DR Industrial Arterial 3 3 3 69 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 PROP-ART-01 PROPOSED ARTERIAL Residential Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 PV4 PLEASANT VALLEY RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* PV5 PLEASANT VALLEY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level PV6 PLEASANT VALLEY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI' S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study PV7-1 PLEASANT VALLEY RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* S NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level PV7-2 PLEASANTVALLEYRD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 PV8 PLEASANTVALLEYRD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 RH1 ROSE HILLST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* RHS ROSE HILL ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 RH2-1 ROSE HI LL ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 RH2-2 ROSE HILL ST Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SG3 SEAMANS GULCH RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired,Roadway Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SG3 SEAMANS GULCH RD Rural Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired,Roadway Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SG2 SEAMANS GULCH RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SH16-1 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* NPI* SH16-1-2 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-2 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-3 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-4 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-5 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-6 SH-16 STATE NFI* NPI* SH16-R-1 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-1 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-10 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-11 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-12 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-13 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-14 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-15 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-16 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-11 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-18 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 18 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project SH16-R-19 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-2 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-20 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-3 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-4 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-5 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-6 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-7 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-8 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH16-R-9 SH-16 STATE(New) NFI* SH21-1 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-10 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-2 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-3 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-4 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-5 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-6 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-7 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-8 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH21-9 SH-21 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-1 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-10 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-11 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-12 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-13 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-14 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SH44-2-1 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-2-2 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-3 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-4 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-5 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-6 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-7 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-8 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-9 SH-44 STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-GL-1 GLENWOOD STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-GL-2 GLENWOOD STATE NFI* NPI* SH44-GL-3 GLENWOOD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-1 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-10 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 SH55-11 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-12 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-13 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-2 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-3 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* 51-155-4 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-5 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-6 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-7 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-8 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55-9 EAGLE RD STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-1 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-2 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-3 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-4 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-5 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH55N-6 SH-55 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-1 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-2 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-3 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-4 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* NFI":No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 19 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project SH69-5 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-6 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-7 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-8 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* SH69-9 SH-69 STATE NFI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 SH69-X-ALT1-1 MERIDIAN ROAD-EXTENTION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 SH69-X-ALT3-2 MERIDIAN ROAD-EXTENTION Mobility Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level3 SHLNE SHORELINE DR Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 ST STROEBEL RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level2 ST.S3 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 7 NFI* 7 NPI* NPI* State Street Study State Street Study State Street Study.Level from Hertford to Ellens Ferry,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3, ST.S-1 STATEST Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 State Street TTOP Study City of Boise recommends 12'wide multi-use pathway on both sides. ST.Sl-DNTN-1 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* ST.S1-DNTN-1 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-30 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 ST.S1-DNTN-2 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-3 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-4 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* ST.S1-DNTN-5 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-6 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-7 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-8 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* ST.Sl-DNTN-9 STATEST Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* State Street Study,Roadway to Bikeway Master ST.S-2 STATEST Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Plan:Level 3,City of Boise recommends 12'wide State Street TTOP Study multi-use pathway on both sides. State Street Study,Roadway to Bikeway Master ST.5-3 STATE ST Mobility Arterial 5 7 7 117 124 Plan:Level 3,City of Boise recommends 32'wide State Street TTOP Study multi-use pathway on both sides. State Street Study,Roadway to Bikeway Master ST.S-4 STATEST Mobility Arterial 6 7 7 117 124 Plan:Level 3,City of Boise recommends 12'wide State Street TTOP Study multi-use pathway on both sides. STl STAR RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 14,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 ST2 STAR RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 3,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 ST3 STAR RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level ST4 STAR RD Residential Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 ST4 STAR RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 SWFLU SWAN FALLS RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired SWFLL2 SWAN FALLS RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired SWFLL3 SWAN FALLS RD Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired SWFLL4 SWAN FALLS RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD Ada County Request:Bike Lanes Desired Ada County Request:Include wide shoulders for SWFLLS SWAN FALLS RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 bike/ped,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Ada County Request:Include wide shoulders for SWFLL6-1 SWAN FALLS RD Industrial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 bike/ped,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 Ada County Request:Include wide shoulders for SWFLL6-2 SWAN FALLS RD Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 bike/ped;Kuna desire:grade-separated rail crossing,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TCRC-1 Three Cities River Crossing STATE(New) 0 NFI* NFI*:No Funded Improvement NPI*:No Planned Improvement 20 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project TCRC-2 Three Cities River Crossing STATE(New) 0 NFI* TCRC-3 Three Cities River Crossing STATE(New) 0 NFI* TECHW3 TECHNOLOGY WAY Industrial Arterial 3 NFI' S NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TECHW2-X TECHNOLOGY WAY- Industrial Arterial(New) 0 NFI* 3 NPI* 76 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 EXTENTION TM10-1 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 NFI' S NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 31,41,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM10-2 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 31,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM1-1 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* 74 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level TIv l-1 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 100 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM11-2 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 100 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 19,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM1-2 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM12-1 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 5 5 96 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 16,19,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM12-2 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Meridian Pathways:Comment 12,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM 1-3 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM13-1 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 5 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM 13-2 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 E Meridian Pathways:Comment 5,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM2-1 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 TM-2-2 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial(NEW) 0 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 TM2-3 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM2-4 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level TM3 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Road way to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM4 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level TM5 TENMILE RD Transitional/Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 87 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 87,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM6-1 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,87,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM6-2 TENMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 69,87,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM7 TENMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 60,69,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM8-1 TENMILE RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 60,Roadwayto South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM8-2 TENMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI' 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 53,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 TM8-3 TENMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 53,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TM9-1 TENMILE RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 South Meridian Transportation Plan TM9-2 TENMILE RD Residential Mobility Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI' 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment41,47;,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TMC1 TENMILE CREEK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TMC2 TENMILE CREEK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 TMC3-X TENMILE CREEK RD Residential Arterial(New) 2 NFI' 3 NPI* 78 Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level UD-1 UNIVERSITY DR Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* E Boise State UniversityMaster Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 UD-1 UNIVERSITY DR Towncenter Arterial 5 NFI' S NPI* NPI' E Boise State UniversityMaster Plan,Roadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 UD-2 UNIVERSITY DR Towncenter Arterial 4 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* E Boise State UniversityMaster Plan,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U51 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U510-1 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan-Level 2 US10-2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U510-3 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U511-1 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level U511-2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US11-3 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 21 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project U512-1 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US12-2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U512-3 USTICK RD Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US33-1 USTICK RD Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US13-2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US33-3 USTICK RD Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US14-1 USTICK RD Trasitional/CommercialArterial 3 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US14-2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 96 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U514-3 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level US144 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US2 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 18,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U53 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 18,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U54 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 19,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U55 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 97 100 Meridian Pathways:Comment 19,20,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 U56-2 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US6-3 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U57 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level U57 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 U57 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level U58 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 5 5 97 96 Meridian Pathways:Comment 21,Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US9-1 USTICK RD Residential Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 US9-2 USTICK RD Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* 96 E Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 VAl VISTA AVE Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* VAL VISTA AVE Trasitional/CommercialArterial 5 NFI' S NPI* NPI* VA2 VISTA AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* VA3 VISTA AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* VA3 VISTA AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VIS VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 58,59,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 VI10-1 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 4 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study VI30-2 VICTORY RD Industrial Arterial 4 NFI* 5 NPI* 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study Vlll VICTORY RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI32 VICTORY RD Industrial Arterial 5 NFI* 5 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI2 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 60,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI3 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 60,61,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI4 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 62,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VIS-1 VICTORY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 3 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 62,Roadway to South West Boise Study;South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI5-2 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 63,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI6-1 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South Meridian Transportation Plan VI6-2 VICTORY RD Planned Commercial Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Meridian Pathways:Comment 65,Roadway to South Meridian Transportation Plan Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 VI6-3 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 3 3 75 78 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South Meridian Transportation Plan VI7 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study;South Meridian Transportation Plan VIS VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 2 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study VI9 VICTORY RD Residential Arterial 3 5 5 90 100 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 South West Boise Study VM3 VETERANSMEMORIAL PKWY Mobility Arterial 4 1 NFI* 1 4 1 NPI* NPI' Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 3 WCRK-1 WILLOWCREEK RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD WCRK-2 WILLOWCREEK RD To Be Decided 2 NFI* 2 NPI* TBD WRMSPRGS-1 WARM SPRINGS AVE Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* WRMSPRGS-1 WARM SPRINGS AVE Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 22 of 23 Master Street Map:Arterial Street List June 28,2023 Adopted by Resolution 2395 Street Code Street Name Street Typology Existing Lanes Planned Lanes:Construction Planned Lanes: ROW: ROW:Preservation Parking Comments Related Studies Preservation Project WRMSPRGS-2 WARM SPRINGS AVE Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* City of Boise requested a 6-ft detached sidewalk with 8-ft buffer on the south side WRMSPRGS-3 WARM SPRINGS AVE Rural Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* City of Boise requested a 6-ft detached sidewalk with 8-ft buffer on the south side WRMSPRGS4 WARM SPRINGS AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 4 NFI* 4 NPI* 96 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 WRMSPRGS-5 WARM SPRINGS AVE Planned Commercial Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 96 Commission aproved reduction from 5 to 3lanes on 10/29/2020 Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2;On WRMSPRGS-CIR WARM SPRINGS AVE- Towncenter Arterial 2 NFI* 3 NPI* 96 10/28/2020,the ACID Commission directed CIRCULATOR continued preservation for 5 lanes,but plan construction to 3lanes. W51-DNTN WARM SPRINGS AVE Towncenter Arterial 3 NFI* 3 NPI* NPI* WS2 WARM SPRINGS AVE Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* Roadway to Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 WS2 IWARM SPRINGS AVE I Neighborhood Residential Arterial 2 NFI* 2 NPI* NPI* WWPBLVD 1WHITE WATER PARK BLVD ITowncenter Arterial 5 NFI* S 1 NPI* 1 96 1 IRoadwayto Bikeway Master Plan:Level 2 NFI':No Funded Improvement NPI':No Planned Improvement 23 of 23 Master Street Map - Planned Number of Lanes Map z z Ada County N Master Street Map W E St 41, tp Draft February 8, 2024 s ' d vetera The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)created the Master Street '�7o Associa Map in collaboration with Ada County and its six cities to better link Medical C land-use and transportation planning. The Master Street Map is = one of the key elements of the ACHD Transportation and Land Use ` Integration Plan.The Master Street Map is a living document and HOMER RD �r is not binding on future Commissions. BEACON LIGHT RD � LIGHT BEACON RD Idde ring z J vp 4_ r FLOATING FEATHER RD J� j Fort O r�� O ro a O n a SH44 AL,STATE ST s O I � � W zz w ❑ J W I CHINDEN BLVD 0� rison M_C, MILLAN RD A r City F ( Julia Davis Park x USTICK RD N I ` FAIRVIEWAVE EMERALD ST , , FRANKLIN RD os Shaw Mountain OVERLAND RD tY ❑ p ' ❑ VICTORY RD LU ❑ w W o o �y Nrg d +• J 1 '—L " ��m a!ley W Y F a Boise Airport AMITY'RD Aortic LI ill rra 1 t AV�1/ i L m LAKE HAZEL RD z RD w m (I 1 O COLUMBIA RD w �z c F �< Lucky 4� r Peak 1 I Zy o Lake f ' r Gp HUBBARD RD J w ti 1 NT po o ►, �� w,. 11 Three DEER FLAT RD TF Point � ,4t7ofr Mountain Kuna � RFF� � I J KUNA RD RO Q I w I KINGRD 1 8`PCKSCREEy_ I MSM Arterials Right-of-Way Preservation KUNA MORA RD State System ❑ Ad 62 ft I Kuna Butte U) W Slaters 75 78 ft veersL<E a 1 Flat 196- 100 ft t a 120 - 200 ft - a No Planned Improvement and TBD w Caldwell ii���Indipp Cie D r a w ti -ek DRAFT- City of Meridian 2025 Overall Project Prioritization 2024 Priority Overall Ranking (PROGRAMMED) PROGRAMMED) 17 Agency Project Name Iriv Agency Project Description ACHD Implementation Project Name IntersectionsRoads & Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes and construct a new 4-lane 1-84 overpass, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Project would be a joint project between ACHD and 1 1 Linder Rd, Overland Rd /Franklin Rd ITD. Linder Rd, Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3, 4 or 5 lanes with curb, gutter and Locust Grove Corridor B: Locust Grove Rd, 2 2 Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd pedestrian/bike facilities. Consider enhanced crossing at Chateau Dr. Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd 3 3 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd Widen intersection. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes. Include preferential bike and pedestrian Victory Corridor B: Victory Rd, Locust 4 4 Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd infrastructure. Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter,and pedestrian/bike Ustick Corridor A: Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd/ 5 5 Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd facilities. Linder Rd Widen Linder Rd to include curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. Include preferential bike and pedestrian infrastructure with Linder Corridor B: Linder Rd, Pine Ave/ 6 6 Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd wayfinding signage. Ustick Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to a minimum 3 lanes, with preservation for up to 5 lanes, with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. Include Locust Grove Corridor B: Locust Grove Rd, 7 7 Locust Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd pedestrian crossings at Palermo and Wrightwood. Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes. Include preferential bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Complete sidewalk/MUP on the south side of Victory Victory Corridor B: Victory Rd, SH 69 8 8 Victory Rd, Meridian Rd/ Locust Grove Rd Rd adjacent to County outparcel. (Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Widen intersection. Intersection improvements to include dual left 9 9 Ten Mile Rd /Cherry Ln turn lanes. Cherry Ln and Ten Mile Rd Widen intersection. Intersection improvements to include dual left South Meridian Improvements B: 10 10 Eagle Rd/Overland Rd turn lanes. Overland Rd and Eagle Rd Widen McMillan Rd up to 5-lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and McMillan Rd, SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust 11 1 McMillan Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd bike/pedestrian facilities. Grove Rd Widen McMillan Rd up to 5-lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and McMillan Rd, Linder Rd/SH 69(Meridian 12 1 1 2 JMcMillan Rd, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd bike/pedestrian facilities. Rd) DRAFT Page 1 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3, 4 or 5 lanes; preserve for 5 lanes, with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Project should include an enhanced crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon)on Locust Grove Road at Heritage Park Street; access for Meridian Technical Charter High Locust Grover Corridor A: Locust Grove 13 11 Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd /McMillan Rd School. Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Widen Meridian Rd to 3, 4 or 5 lanes; preserve for 5 lanes, with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Project should include an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Meridian Rd at/near Settlers Park Meridian Corridor A: Meridian Rd, Ustick 14 12 Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd entrance and Sundance Subdivision micropath. Rd/McMillan Rd Ustick Corridor A: Ustick Rd and Black Cat 15 13 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection. Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter,and pedestrian/bike Ustick Corridor A: Ustick Rd, Black Cat Rd 16 14 Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile facilities. /Ten Mile Rd Widen Amity Rd to minimum 3 lanes with preservation for up to 5 lanes. Include preferential bike and pedestrian infrastructure for Mary Amity Corridor A:Amity Rd, SH69 17 15 Amity, Meridian to Locust Grove McPherson elementary school. (Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Widen Black Cat Rd with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. An interim help could be improvements north of Franklin to the RR 18 16 Black Cat, Franklin to Cherry tracks near COMPASS school. Blact Cat Rd, Franklin Rd/Cherry Ln 19 3 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection.Address transition from bike-lane to/from MUP. Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd 20 4 Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Widen intersection. Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Widen Cherry Ln with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike/pedestrian 21 5 Cherry, Black Cat to McDermott facilities. Widen Fairview Ave with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike/pedestrian Fairview Ave, SH 55(Eagle Rd)/ 22 6 Fairview Ave, SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Rd facilities. Cloverdale Rd Widen Fairview Ave with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike/pedestrian Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd/Locust Grove 23 7 Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd/ Locust Grove Rd facilities. Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike/pedestrian 24 8 Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd /Victory Rd facilities. Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd 25 9 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection. Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd 26 10 McMillan Rd and Star Rd Widen intersection. McMillan Rd and Star Rd DRAFT Page 2 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description Widen Linder Rd to include curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. Include preferential bike and pedestrian infrastructure with 27 11 Linder, Pine/Cherry wayfinding signage(several nearby and directly adjacent schools). 28 12 Amity Rd and Linder Rd Widen intersection. Amity Rd and Linder Rd Widen Lake Hazel Rd and improve with curb, gutter and 29 17 Lake Hazel, Locust Grove to Eagle pedestrian/bike facilities. Lake Hazel Rd, Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd 30 13 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Widen intersection. Cherry Ln and Linder Rd 31 14 Ustick Rd and Venable Ln Install full signal or roundabout. Improve safety and traffic operations along Fairview Ave in accordance with the Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy. Project may include bicycle and pedestrian facilities and Fairview Ave Corridor Management, 32 28 Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Rd /Orchard St other access management treatments. Linder Rd/Orchard St Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, MUP and improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St/ 33 1 East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St/ Fairview Ave(Phase 2) Fairview Ave in accordance with several downtown plans and studies. Fairview Ave Extend roadway from its current terminus at NE 6th Street to Broadway Ave/ Idaho Ave Extension, East Stonehenge Way/ Commercial Drive and construct streetscape Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension, 06th 34 6 06th St/Locust Grove Rd improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk/MUP. St/Locust Grove Rd Widen Meridian Rd to 3, 4 or 5 lanes; preserve for 5 lanes, with curb, Meridian Corridor A: Meridian Rd, 35 1 18 Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd /Chinden Blvd gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden Blvd) 36 19 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Widen and signalize intersection. Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike Victory Corridor D: Victory Rd, Linder Rd/ 37 20 Victory, Linder to Meridian facilities. SH 6 9(Meridian Rd) Widen Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike Franklin Corridor A: Franklin Rd, 38 21 Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd /Black Cat Rd facilities. McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd DRAFT Page 3 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description Widen Linder Rd. with bike and pedestrian facilities as this is one of only a few river crossings in the County and connects to nearby Eagle Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 39 22 Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26)/SH 44(State St) Island State Park. Part of City's envisioned pathway network. 44(State St) Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb, gutter pedestrian/bike Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd/SH55 40 23 Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd/SH 55 (Eagle Rd) facilities. (Eagle Rd) McMillan and BlacTTat R 41 24 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection. Roundabout Improve intersection operation. This may mean adding additional 42 15 Meridian/Overland Signal lanes. Overland Rd and SH 69(Meridian Rd) Widen intersection. Coordinate design with ITD and the SH-16 Franklin Corridor A: Franklin Rd and 43 25 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd improvements. McDermott Rd Ustick Corridor B: Ustick Rd and 44 26 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Widen intersection. McDermott Rd 45 18 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd Widen intersection. McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd 46 27 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Widen intersection. Ustick Rd and Star Rd 47 19 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Improve intersection. Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Construct interim signalized intersection with preservation for future Amity Corridor A:Amity Rd and Locust 48 28 Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd widening to accommodate 5-lane roadways in all directions. Grove Rd Victory Corridor D: Victory Rd and Linder 49 29 Victory Rd and Linder Rd Widen intersection. Rd Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd /Chinden Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3, 4 or 5 lanes; preserve for 5 lanes, with Locust Grove Corridor A: Locust Grove Rd, 50 30 Blvd (US 20/26) curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden Blvd) Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike Ustick Corridor B: Ustick Rd, Owyhee 51 31 Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd /Black Cat Rd facilities. Storm Ave/Black Cat Rd Widen the entire segment to 3-travel lanes with curb, gutter, 52 16 Pine, Linder to Meridian sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use bikeway. Pine Ave, Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Improve intersection operation. This may mean adding additional 53 20 Eagle Rd/ Fairview Ave lanes. Eagle Rd and Fairview Ave Improve intersection/entry into City Park. The improvements could be a signal, roundabout, or other, but should include provisions for 54 21 Lake Hazel/ Discovery Park pedestrians/bicyclists. Lake Hazel Rd and Discovery Park Widen Amity Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. Include enhanced pedestrian crossing at Ten Mile Creek pathway crossing and install pedestrian/bike improvements on Amity Amity Corridor B:Amity Rd, Eagle Rd/ 55 32 Amity, Eagle to Cloverdale Rd near the YMCA and City Park so there are no gaps. Cloverdale Rd. Widen Amity Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter and pedestrian/bike facilities. Include enhanced pedestiran crossing at Ten Mile Creek Amity Corridor B:Amity Rd, Locust Grove 56 33 Amity, Locust Grove to Eagle pathway crossing. Rd/Eagle Rd DRAFT Page 4 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description 57 22 Victory,Ten Mile to Linder Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Victory Rd, Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd 58 17 Black Cat, Cherry to Ustick Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Black Cat Rd, Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd 59 23 Black Cat, Ustick to McMillan Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Black Cat Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Black Cat Rd, McMillan Rd/US 20/26 60 24 Black Cat, McMillan to Chinden Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. (Chinden Blvd) 61 25 McMillan, Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. McMillan Rd, Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Rd Widen with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike facilities. Project should include an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on 62 26 McMillan,Ten Mile to Linder McMillan Rd at Pantine Way, near Hunter Elementary. McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, and pedestrian/bike 63 34 Eagle, Lake Hazel to Amity facilities. Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd up to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, and 64 27 Locust Grove, Lake Hazel to Amity pedestrian/bike facilities. Locust Grove Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd 65 29 Locust Grove and McMillan Improve intersection. 66 30 Meridian and McMillan Improve intersection. 67 31 Linder and McMillan Improve intersection. 68 32 Ten Mile and McMillan Improve intersection. Community • • Reconstruct Stoddard Rd, between Victory Rd and Overland Rd to 3- lanes, 7' attached sidewalks and bike lanes. Project includes bridge #2085 and an enhanced pedestrian crossing (pedestrian hybrid Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd /Overland Rd (Stoddard Rd, Victory beacon) at Victory and Stoddard (CM214-27). Bike lanes may be South Meridian Improvements A: 1 1 Rd/ Kodiak Dr) replaced by a pathway per the Bike Master Plan Update. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd/Overland Rd Construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and improved UPRR crossing, from Franklin Rd to Carlton Meridian Downtown Improvements A: 2 2 East 03rd St, Franklin Rd /Carlton Ave(Phase 1) lAve in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. lEast0rdSt, Franklin Rd/Carlton St DRAFT Page 5 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description City requests detached concrete sidewalk with curbing between Goddard Creek Way and Wild Goose Way. City requests a pedestrian crossing across McMillan near Hunter Elementary (near Linder Corridor B: Linder Rd, Pine Ave/ 3 5 McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd /Linder Rd Palatine Way). See Priority#18 below; please construct concurrently. Ustick Rd North Meridian Improvements B: McMillan Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Main St at King Street. Rd, Goddard Creek Way/Wild Goose 4 6 Main St and King Street Pedestrian Crossing Main Street northbound has 3 lanes and creates a safety concern. Way Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding signage on Bower St, North Boise Improvements C: Bower St, 5 7 Bower St, Meridian Rd /E. 03rd St between Meridian Rd and E. 03rd St. Meridian Rd/03rd St Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing (rectangular rapid flashing beacon) on Pine Ave at W 01st St to improve access to Meridian Meridian Downtown Improvements B: 6 8 Pine Ave and W. 1 st St Pedestrian Crossing Elementary School. Pine Ave and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing North Meridian Improvements A: Complete sidewalk on the north side of McMillan Rd, between Locust McMillan Rd, Red Horse Way/Locust 7 9 McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd /Red Horse Way Grove Rd and Red Horse Way. Grove Rd Include preferential bike and pedestrian infrastructre near Meridian High School. Complete sidewalk on the west side of Linder Rd, between Washington St and Maple St. These improvements are Linder Corridor B: Linder Rd, Pine Ave/ 8 3 Linder Rd, Washington St/ Maple St needed sooner than what is planned with the roadway project. Ustick Rd Pedestrian connection (sidewalk) between Barbara Dr in Fairview Terrace Park to E. Willowbrook Dr and Chief Joseph Elementary on 9 9 Fairview Terrace to Chief Joseph Chateau Drive. Need right-of-way. Barbara Dr Pedestrian Connection South Meridian Improvments A: Locust Install an enhanced pedestrian signal and lighting on the north side Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian 10 10 Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Signal of Palermo Dr at Locust Grove Rd. Crossing schools and City park. These improvements are needed sooner than 11 4 Linder Road, Maple Avenue/Cherry Lane what is planned with the roadway project. Linder Rd Bikeway, Maple Ave/Cherry Ln Install bike facilities. Several (likely 5)segments needed. City requests ACHD's assistance in prioritizing and scoping corridor connections Ustick-Cherry Bikeway, Black Cat Rd/ 12 2 Ustick-Cherry Bikeway, Black Cat Road /Chateau Drive (likely east to west.) Hickory Way Connect gap from existing sidewalk on west side of Locust Grove Rd, along with improving narrow sidewalk on east side of roadway newar Leighfield Dr and Star Dr; east side of Locust Grove Rd to connect with an existing path to the school near Paradise Ln and Grand Canyon Dr; and install an enhanced crossing (PHB) on Locust Grove Rd at Heritage Park St, near Meridian Technical Charter High School. These improvements are needed sooner than what is planned with Locust Grover Corridor A: Locust Grove 13 1 11 Locust Grove Road, Leighfield Drive to Star Lane the roadway project. Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd DRAFT Page 6 of 9 2024 Priority 2024 2024 RankingOverall • Ranking • • . Description North Meridian Improvements A: Linder- 14 12 Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Cherry Lane/Chinden Boulevard Install bike facilities. Meridian Bikeway, Pine Ave/Temple Dr 15 3 Cherry Ln, Linder Rd /Meridian Rd Install bike facilities along Cherry Ln from Linder Rd to Meridian Rd Cherry Ln, Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway, W 08th St/ 16 4 Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway, Linder Road/Chinden Boulevard Install bike facilities, signing and pavement markings. Chinden Blvd McMillan-Ustick Bikeway(Phase 3), Linder 17 5 McMillan-Ustick Bikeway, Cool River Avenue/ Eagle Road Install bike facilities. Rd/Eagle Rd) Extend roadway from its current terminus at NE 6th St to Stonehenge Broadway Ave/ Idaho Ave Extension, East Way/Commercial Dr and construct streetscape improvements, Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension, 06th 18 6 06th St/Locust Grove Rd including curb, gutter, sidewalk/MUP. St/Locust Grove Rd 19 7 W Park Creek Dr, Crosswalk at N Deer Creek Ln Install enhanced crossing with hawk signal or RRFB Install sidewalk to fix gap on NW 7th St.This gap prevents connection from the sidewalk from the south and east from connecting to the 20 8 W 7th St, Cedarburg to Washington micro-path at Meridian Middle School/8th St. Install pedestrian/bike facilities on the west side of McDermott Rd connecting to infrastructure on Ustick Rd and McMillan Rd for McDermott Rd Pedestrian Facilities, Ustick 21 13 McDermott Road, Ustick Road to McMillan Road connectivity to Owyhee High School. Rd/McMillan Rd Central Meridian Bikeway, Blue Heron Street/Chinden Install bike facilities along the Central Meridian Bikeway from Blue Ponderosa Elementary School Zone 22 14 Boulevard Heron Street to Chinden Boulevard. Flashers Install 20mph school zone signs. Should this be an enhanced Ponderosa Elementary School Zone 23 10 N Naomi Ave, Usitck to Ponderosa crossing or 20mph or both? Flashers Install bike facilities. Several (likely 3)segments needed. City requests ACHD's assistance in prioritizing and scoping corridor connections Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway, Pine Ave/ 24 11 Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway, Pine Avenue/ McMillan Road (likely south to north.) Chinden Blvd Construct pedestrian/bicycle faciliteis on Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads Middle School/RR Tracks. See Priority #19 below; Nola Rd, Pine Ave/Crossroads Middle 25 12 Nola Rd, south of Pine Ave Middle School construct concurrently. School Install bike facilities along the Chinden-McMillan Bikeway from Ten Mile Road to Sedona Drive. Note: Most of the stretch already is built 26 15 Chinden-McMillan Bikeway,Ten Mile Road/Sedona Drive or has an alternative pathway; Locust grove to City Limits still needed. Bikeway Signage(2026) Granger Avenue Bikeway, Records Avenue/Cloverdale Install bike facilities, including signage, near The Village to complete 27 16 Road Igaps in network. 1 Bikeway Signage Program (2024) DRAFT Page 7 of 9 Overall2024 Priority 2024 2024 Priority Ranking Ranking (PROGRAMMED) PROGRAMMED) Agency Project Name Agency Project Description ACHD Implementation Project Name Boise Improvements B: Install signage and pavement markings along Hollandale- Hollandale-Targee Bikeway, Locust Grove 28 17 Hollandale-Targee Bikeway, Locust Grove Road / Eagle Road TargeeBikeway from Locust Grove Rd to Eagle Rd. Rd/Entertainment Ave Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan North Meridian Improvements A: Rd at Palantine Way. See Priority #5 above; please construct McMillan Rd and Palatine Way Pedestrian 29 18 McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Crossing concurrently. Crossing Complete sidewalks on the south side of Broadway Ave, between Meridian Downtown Improvements C: 30 19 Broadway Ave, West 07th St/West 04th St West 07th St and West 04th St. Broadway Ave, West 08th St/West 04th St Install sidewalk on the west and/or east side of 2 112 St, south of Meridian Downtown Improvements A: 31 20 East 2 112 St, Carlton Ave/ Fairview Ave Fairview Ave near Cole Valley Christian School. East 2 1/2 St, Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale Elementary School and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan and near Rockhampton/Hill Hillsdale Elementary Pedestrian Crossings 32 13 IStockenham Enhanced Cross-walks Park St. Update school zone signs and flashers. and School Zone Install sidewalk to fix gap on south side of Taormina Dr near Maesaia 33 14 Taormina Drive at Maesaia Way Way. Taormina Dr at Maesaia Way Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in accordance with several downtown plans and East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St/ 34 1 E. 3rd, Carlton to Fairview studies. Fairview Ave Meridian Downtown Improvements A: Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr 35 21 Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Crossing Woodbridge Dr or Watertower St. Pedestrian Crossing Study the connectivity and bikeability of the Woodbridge 36 15 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study neighborhood, between Locust Grove Rd and Eagle Rd, north of 1-84. Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Watertower St and Rebound School 37 16 Watertower St at Rebound School Install a painted crosswalk on Watertower St at Rebound School. Pedestrian Crossing Meridian Rd and Producer Dr Pedestrian 38 17 St. Ignatius School Pedestrian Signal Install pedestrian signal on Meridian Rd at Producer Dr. Crossing Complete sidewalk on both sides of West 02nd St, between the Union Pacific Railroad and Broadway Ave to address parking 39 18 West 02nd St, UPRR/ Broadway Ave concerns in this area. West 02nd, UPRR/Broadway Ave Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at Crossroads Middle School. Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School 40 19 Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian Crossing See Priority#12 above; construct concurrently. Pedestrian Crossing Gondola-Malta Bikeway, Black Cat Road /Goddard Creek Records Way Bikeway, Pine Ave/Chinden 41 20 Way Install bike facilities. (Bikeway Signage Program -2024) DRAFT Page 8 of 9 2024 2024 Priority Ranking 2024 Priority Ranking (PROGRAMMED) PROGRAMMIEtD) JL Agency Project Name Agency Project Description ACHD Implementation Project Name bike facilities along the Records Way Bikeway from Pine Ave to Florence Dr, and from Ustick Rd to Baldcypress St, and from Records Way Bikeway, Pine Ave/Chinden 42 22 Records Way Bikeway, Pine Avenue/ Fernside Drive Baldcypress St to Wainwright Dr. (BikewaySignage Program -2024) Install sidewalk on east side of Montague Way from Amity Rd to Montague Way,Amity Rd/Santo Stefano 43 21 Montague Way,Amity Road /Santo Stefano Drive Santo Stefano Dr. Dr Black at- en i e i<eway(Phase , 44 22 Black Cat-Ten Mile Bikeway, Cherry Lane/ Ustick Road Install bike facilities along the Black Cat-Ten Mike Bikeway. Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Install multi-use pathway, between Pine Ave and Franklin Rd.This would connect the pathway on Pine Ave, west of Locust Grove Rd to Franklin Rd, where the pathway then resumes along the Five Mile Creek. This would replace some existing sidewalk with a multiuse 45 23 Locust Grove, Pine to Franklin MUP pathway. DRAFT Page 9 of 9 - s � ►.4Y Drone photography courtesy of Dennis Meredith,ACHD 2020-2040 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Adopted August 19, 2020 Amended July 27, 2022 .40 CHD �' Gflm. ��o �vicc ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Introduction The 2020 Ada County Highway District Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) was prepared to meet the requirements of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. In all cases the CIP was prepared using the most recent and best available data. To understand and capture current and upcoming transportation challenges, modeling of the transportation system is necessary in order to complete the picture of the future deficiencies in the system and the investments needed to mitigate those future needs. One way to better understand future needs is to conduct and adopt corridor and/or sub-area studies that outline improvements and mitigation strategies based on closer scrutiny of a particular roadway corridor or area in the County. These plans and studies guide ACHD's future project development by responding to service needs as well as recognizing the community growth designated through the local land use agencies' Comprehensive Plans and related documents. By understanding these conditions, prioritization and sequencing of transportation improvements can be synchronized to assure that the adopted projects are implemented with the best possible coordination for the forecasted growth. The CIP was developed with consideration of plans adopted by the ACHD Commission. Projects have been derived from long-range plans, studies, and other planning documents to better identify specific travel needs, characteristics and to recognize areas of future growth. The referenced documents include: ❖ ACHD 2016 CIP ❖ ACHD 2016 Strategic Plan ❖ ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Plan ❖ ACHD Master Street Map ❖ Ada County Roundabout Study ❖ Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan ❖ Floating Feather Road Corridor Improvement Study ❖ Kuna Mora Corridor Study ❖ Lake Hazel Corridor Study ❖ Livable Street Design Guide ❖ Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan ❖ Roadways to Bikeways: Bike Master Plan ❖ South Meridian Transportation Plan ❖ Southwest Boise Transportation Study ❖ State Street Transit and Traffic Operations Plan The CIP is also based on an analysis of future transportation system deficiencies. The Regional Travel Demand Model was summarized to identify where future traffic volumes exceed the Service Capacity of ACHD's roadway system. Attachment A shows and lists the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) eligible street and intersection capacity improvement projects as follows: ❖ Project Map ❖ Table A-1 Street Projects ❖ Table A-2 Intersections Projects ❖ Table A-3 Unfunded List- Design and Construction Costs Only ❖ Table A-4 Street Projects by Year ❖ Table A-5 Intersection Projects by Year Adopted August 19,2020—Amended July 27,2022 Page C-1 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C The final design of the street and intersection capacity improvement projects will be based on current conditions at the time of design and may vary from the description in Attachment A. In the event of any significant change in the TIF eligible street and intersection capacity improvement projects set forth in Attachment A,ACHD will update the CIP in accordance with Section 7310.3 of the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance. The following is a summary of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act and a description of how the CIP addresses each section of the Act: Idaho Development Impact Fee Act — CIP Requirements The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act requires that impact fees be based on a capital improvements plan that must contain specific elements, each of which are noted and summarized below as originally defined in§67-8208 of the Idaho Code. A. General description of all ACHD existing public facilities,their deficiencies, an estimate of costs, and a plan to develop the funding sources related to curing the existing deficiencies to meet existing needs; B. Stated commitment by the governmental entity to use other available sources of revenue to cure existing systems deficiencies (where practical); C. Analysis of capacity, level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of existing capital improvements; D. Description of land use assumptions by the government entity; E. Definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption or discharge of a "service unit" (e.g. roadway volume-to-capacity) for each category of system improvements, and an equivalency or conversion table establishing a ratio of a service unit to various land use types; F. Description of all system improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions,to provide a level of service planning threshold not to exceed the level of service planning threshold adopted in the development impact fee ordinance; G. Total number of service units necessitated and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; H. Projected demand for system improvements required by the new service units projected over a reasonable period of time not to exceed 20 years; I. Identification of all funding sources available to the government entity for the financing of system improvements; J. Specifies inter-governmental agreements for multi jurisdiction system improvements, further restricting the use of impact fees; and K. A schedule setting forth estimated dates for commencing and completing construction of all improvements identified in the capital improvements plan. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-2 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Section A: General Description of Existing System §67-8208 ACHD maintains and operates over 2,400 miles of roads and streets in Ada County, ranging from multi-lane arterial streets to rural roadways. ACHD also maintains and operates 808 bridges. There are a number of state and national highways and freeways in Ada County, including 1-84, 1- 184, US 20/26, SH-16, SH-21, SH-44, SH-55 and SH-69. ACHD classifies the roadway system by general function within Ada County. There are five roadway classifications: interstate, principal arterial, minor arterial, collector, and local roads. The functional classification of a roadway provides the basis in calculating capacity and generally estimating the existing and future level of service of the various roads and highways within Ada County(see Sections C and H, respectively, for analysis findings of existing and future transportation systems). There are a few ACHD streets and roads with current traffic demand exceeding the Service Capacity (see Section C). It is ACHD's practice and planned intent,through regular completion of the Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP),to fund street improvements to cure existing deficiencies with revenues other than traffic impact fees (see Section 1). Existing arterial street deficiencies are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-3 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Table 1: Existing Deficiencies Street From To Existing Lanes Deficiency Cloverdale Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Cloverdale Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Cloverdale Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Emerald St Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Five Mile Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Five Mile Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Five Mile Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Linder Rd Cherry Ln Ustick Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Locust Grove Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Locust Grove Rd Fairview Ave Ustick Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Locust Grove Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Maple Grove Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Maple Grove Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane McMillan Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane McMillan Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Overland Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2 Lanes 7 Lane Star Rd US 20/26 SH 44 2 Lanes 3 Lane State St Glenwood St Pierce Park Ln 2 Lanes 7 Lane State St Pierce Park Collister Dr 2 Lanes 7 Lane State St Collister Dr Veterans Memorial Pkwy 2 Lanes 7 Lane Ten Mile Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Ustick Rd Cole Rd Curtis 2 Lanes 5 Lane Victory Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Victory Rd Locust Grove Eagle Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Rd Victory Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2 Lanes 3 Lane Victory Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Victory Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Victory Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 2 Lanes 5 Lane Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-4 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Figure 1:2020 Existing Deficiencies Map w '' OWE e�aax�nn�rs I � GXl�1R4U � Fi uru.�•r.�p _ 11611GS f16 III1-.I a CxEXXr in � rh�.m},wrr �� I � rrcxrt � o FF�IWJXhV � ¢ cvoq.,raaw ,.. �nCTO�[i AG exrrr� ..wrFwn no � ��qp x Sc 2 S [a44NgLLrq r�nrtu�n np 011AM Tha d ra 2020 Existing Deficiencies I Segment Congested in 2020 Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-5 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Section B., Stated Commitment to Use Other Revenue to Cure Existing System Deficiencies §67-8208 It is ACHD's policy to use revenue sources other than traffic impact fees to cure existing deficiencies, where practical. Section C: Analysis of Existing Capacity §67-8208 The Regional Travel Demand Model (2015) was used to consistently and comprehensively analyze the current regional roadway network in Ada County. The Regional Travel Demand Model makes the land use/transportation connection for comparison of existing and future traffic conditions within Ada County. The model is used to test and evaluate transportation system improvements. The model includes structure to estimate traffic conditions during the P.M. peak hour. Travel demand model estimates and measurements of P.M. peak hour traffic conditions do not regularly and consistently pinpoint operational problems that can often occur. They do, however, provide a good indicator of whether a given route has the general Service Capacity to accommodate area travel demand. Current system-wide travel characteristics from the travel demand model are summarized in Table 2, including vehicle miles of travel, or VMT (general summary of travel demand), and lane miles of congested roads (general summary of system performance). The characteristics were obtained for each functional class of roadway within Ada County designated as collector and above,with state roads and highways delineated. The lane miles of congested roads statistic was generally calculated as any roadway meeting or exceeding the accepted LOS planning threshold (see Section Q. Table 2:2020 PM Peak Hour Network Travel Characteristics Street Classification 2020 Vehicle 2020 Ldne Miles Miles Traveled of Congested (VMT) Roads Principal Arterial 167,597 7.44 Minor Arterial 204,166 32.73 Collector 39,014 0.48 ITD State Roads 385,207 31.06 Total '79-9; 98? 71.71 Source: Regional Travel Demand Model and Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 - Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-6 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C �ecu0n U. uebcrlpuen UI Land Use Assumptions §67-8208 Future travel demand estimates in Ada County are based on regional population, housing, and employment forecasts. These demographic forecasts are developed by COMPASS and based on the Comprehensive Plans from each jurisdiction within and including Ada County. All of this data is assimilated by COMPASS in the Regional Travel Demand Model used to prepare the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0-Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan (RTP). The Comprehensive Plan-based, socio-economic input data (households and employment by employment class) for the base-year and 20-year planning horizon are summarized in Table 3. Table 3:Communities In Motion 2040 RTP Socio-Economic Data Ada County Population Housenolas Employment Retail Office Industrial 1 Government 2020 492,718 188,990 48,783 118,253 36,168 14,984 2040 680,760 275,645 84,264 196,833 51,867 20,359 SOURCE: Communities in Motion 2040 2.0-Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan Section E: Definition Establishing Quantity of Use §67-8208 ACHD employs a volume-to-capacity(v/c) "quantity of use" measurement for streets and intersections consistent with the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0-Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan. The travel demand model includes planning-level street service capacities by general street functional classification. ACHD adopted a street Service Capacity measure that established the volume-to-capacity measure for arterial streets, using consistent analytical assumptions similar to those identified for intersections. Arterial Street Capacity The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)l has developed a multi-modal LOS policy and set of application tools (LOSPLAN) for highway and arterial streets planning, consistent with the FHWA Highway Capacity Manual. These applications were used to establish LOS planning thresholds for ACHD's arterial streets, utilizing various local parameters consistent with those applied to intersections. Table 4 summarizes the street LOS planning thresholds, by arterial classification and type, used to identify ACHD arterial street service capacity needs in the 2020 CIP. To identify capacity deficiencies and street improvement needs, ACHD Service Capacity planning thresholds are adopted at LOS E Planning Threshold for MinorArterials and Principal Arterials. 1 Florida Department of Transportation,Quality,Level of Service Handbook,2013 and LOSPLAN. Adopted August 79, 2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-7 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Table 4:ACHD Street Service Capacity Guidelines #of Lanes Peak Hour Volume per Direction Level of Service Planning Thresholds Principal Arterials(PA) of Travel D E No Left Turn Lane 1 600 690 Continuous Center Left Turn Lane 1 770 880 2 1680 1780 3 2560 2720 Median Control,Channelized Left Turn Lanes at Major Intersections 1 850 920 2 1860 1960 3 2800 3000 Minor Arterials(MA #Lanes D E No Left Turn Lane 1 540 575 Continuous Center Left Turn Lane 1 675 720 2 1395 1540 3 2155 2370 Median Control,Channelized Left Turn Lanes at Major Intersections 1 710 770 2 1465 1670 3 2270 2530 PA/MA in Central Business District #Lanes D E One Way Street 1 680 850 2 1360 1700 3 2040 2550 4 2720 3400 Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-8 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Intersection Service Capacity Intersection measures and thresholds based on the volume-to-capacity ratio are applied based on the Highway Capacity Manual (2010) and Florida Department of Transportation LOS Handbook. Table 5 identifies the adopted ACHD method for intersection capacity analysis. Table 5: Intersection Capacity Analysis Methods Defined Parameters' Sat. Cycle Min. Lost PHF Flow. Lengt Left Time (vphpl) h(sec) (sec) (sec) Capacity. LOS"D"=V/C.90 LOS"E"=1.00 Method. Intersection v/c=0.90; 1,800 150 20 3 0.90 AND Lane Group v/c= 1.0t' 'saturation flow-rate;signal cycle length,minimum left-turn phasing,lost time per phase,and peak hour factor Section F: Description of System Improvements and Costs Necessitated and Attributable to New Development §67-8208 Between 2020 and 2040, future development will generate new traffic causing many routes within the ACHD roadway system to operate below accepted LOS Planning Thresholds. A number of street and intersection system improvements will be needed to add sufficient capacity to the ACHD system in order to mitigate the future capacity deficiencies caused by new development. Project cost estimates for years 2021-2025 are taken from the IFYWP. Project costs for years 2026-2040 are estimated for the CIP and are adjusted for inflation consistent with the ACHD Strategic Plan beginning in program year 2026 by the 5 year increments in which the projects are scheduled: 2026-2030, 2031-2035, and 2036-2040. The total cost of these future transportation system improvements is estimated at $1,169 million, of which $730 million is eligible for traffic impact fee funding. The remaining approximately$439 million in non-impact fee eligible project costs must then be funded through other revenue sources. CIP costs were balanced to the available projected revenue by creating an unfunded list (Attachment A,Table A-3). The unfunded list includes lower priority projects and lists out the portions of the project costs removed from the funded portion of the CIP. For these purposes, project costs are broken down into two categories: 1. design and construction; 2. right-of-way corridor preservation. Projects on the unfunded list are unfunded for design and construction but include funding for right-of-way corridor preservation. This process of removing lower priority projects to the unfunded list reduced the total estimated cost of the future transportation system improvements in the CIP to approximately$974 million, of which $642 million is eligible for impact fee funding and $332 million is not impact fee eligible and will be funded from other revenue sources as shown in Figure 2. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-9 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Figure 2: Breakdown of CIP Costs ACHD 2020 CIP Costs: $1,169,430,000 Unfunded $195,710,000 TIF-Eligible $641,670,000 Non TIF-Eligible $332,050,000 Traffic Impact Fee-Eligible Costs The total cost of transportation improvement projects needed to serve new growth and development is eligible for traffic impact fee funding. Without growth and development,those additional capacity improvements to serve growth become unnecessary, and only those transportation improvement projects required to correct existing deficiencies within Ada County remain. The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act emphasizes that local governments levy impact fees that do not charge growth (development) more than their"proportionate share"for system improvements. A proportionate share concept was developed and applied to the CIP to determine the general impact fee eligibility conditions for each component of a typical,future roadway capacity improvement project. Those project elements fully eligible for impact fee funding generally include right-of-way costs, system storm drain facilities,traffic signals,the costs to improve curb and gutter, and intersection approaches. The costs of reconstructing the existing roadway, bike lanes, sidewalks, irrigation facilities, utility adjustments, and landscaping are assumed in-eligible for impact fee funding. The remaining elements of a typical project were determined partially eligible for impact fee funding based on a percentage of the new system capacity. These project elements include engineering and construction costs related to roadway excavation, pavement, structures, signage, storm water/pollution, control and traffic control improvements. Table 6 summarizes the various arterial street improvement components that are impact fee eligible. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-10 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Table 6: Impact Fee Eligibility of System Street and Intersection Components Fully Impact Fee Eligible Right-of-way(all, including wetland mitigation) Additional Travel Lanes (including bridges) System Intersections listed in Table A-2 (including rebuild or new, approaches, roundabouts, signals and medians) System Intersections within Street Projects listed in Table A-1 (including rebuild or new, approaches, roundabouts, signals and medians) System Storm Drain (including green storm water infrastructure treatments) Signalized Pedestrian Crossings Partially Impact Fee Eligible Design and Construction Engineering Storm Water/Pollution Control Not Impact Fee Eligible Reconstruction of Existing Travel Lanes Bicycle Lanes Sidewalks Landscaping and Treatments(All, including art)) Irrigation (All) Utilities (All) Transit and HOV Lanes Section G: Number of Service Units Necessitated and Attributable to New Development §67-8208 Future travel demand estimates in Ada County are based on regional population, housing, and employment forecasts (see Section D). All of this data is assimilated by COMPASS in the regional travel demand model used to prepare the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0-Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan. The Regional Travel Demand Model forecasts P.M. peak hour vehicle trips. The P.M. peak hour vehicle trips are estimated from the Comprehensive Plan-based, socio- economic input data (households and employment by employment class) for the base-year and 20-year planning horizon as shown in Table 7. Table 7:COMPASS Travel Model Socio-Economic Data Input and Year P.M.Peak Population Households Employment Hour Trips Retail Office Industrial Government 2020 110,267 492,718 188,990 48,783 118,253 36,168 14,984 2040 156,293 680,760 275,645 84,264 196,833 51,867 20,359 SOURCE: Regional Travel Demand Model,2015 The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act specifies that projected demand for system improvement requirements (by the new"service unit") not exceed 20 years. During the 2021 to 2040 planning horizon, 260,730 total new P.M. peak hour vehicle miles travelled are projected to be generated on the ACHD System by new development within Ada County as shown in Table 8. For consistency with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act "proportionate share" requirement, Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-11 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C service unit is defined more specifically in the ACHD traffic impact fee methodology as vehicle miles traveled (number and length of trip) generated by new development in Ada County, exclusively on ACHD's arterial streets during the peak hour. Attachment B contains a table for the Ada County Service Area relating the general service unit to various land uses. Table 8:Ada County 20-year Net New System VMT Service Area:Ada County ACHD System Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT)—PM Peak Hour Total: 2020 371,763 2040 632,493 Net New Svstem VMT Total: ')60.73r SOURCE: Regional Travel Demand Model,2015 Excluding Canyon County and"external-external"trips(e.g.Oregon to Twin Falls)on the Ada County roadway system Section R Projected Demand for System Improvements §67-8208 The projected travel demand on the regional roadway network in Ada County was estimated using the Regional Travel Demand Model, consistent with the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 Long-Range Transportation Plan, the ACHD Master Street Map (MSM), and the same methodology as existing conditions (see Section Q. In addition,to provide a more realistic future traffic distribution on the ACHD System, improvements to select segments of the ITD road system were assumed in the modeling even though they are not fully funded in Communities in Motion. These assumptions were necessary to provide more realistic projections of future traffic demand on the ACHD System roads that parallel ITD routes or cross 1-84 or I-184. The assumed improvements include: ❖ ITD road segments input into the model: ➢ SH-16 Extension from Chinden Blvd south to 1-84 ❖ ITD overpasses input into the model at 4 lanes ➢ Black Cat Rd ➢ Linder Rd ➢ Five Mile Rd ➢ Emerald St The output from the Regional Travel Demand Model is used to identify those ACHD arterial roadway segments that are projected to exceed acceptable volume standards and are thus candidates for widening. Using the MSM as a guiding document,the identified roadway segments may be widened to the lane configuration recommended in the MSM. Roadway segments that are built to the number of lanes identified in the MSM are not considered for widening. In this way,the future traffic was distributed to other routes as a given roadway segment would reach its planning threshold. ACHD arterial roadway segments constrained by the MSM that are projected to exceed adopted volume standards in 2040 are summarized in Table 9 and illustrated in Figure 3. Adopted August 79, 2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-12 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Table 9:Constrained Road Segments 2040 Street From To MSM Lane Constraint Amity Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 3 Beacon Light Rd Emmett Hwy(SH 16) Palmer Ln 3 Beacon Light Rd Palmer Ln Linder Rd 3 Beacon Light Rd Linder Rd Park Ln 3 Beacon Light Rd Park Ln Ballantyne Ln 3 Beacon Light Rd Ballantyne Ln Eagle Rd 3 Beacon Light Rd Eagle Rd Horseshoe Bend Rd (SH 55) 3 Bogus Basin Rd Hill Rd Cartwright Rd 2 Cherry Ln Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Deer Flat Rd Hubbard Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 5 Cloverdale Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 5 Cole Rd Franklin Rd Fairview Ave 4 Deer Flat Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 5 Eagle Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 5 Eagle Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 5 Emerald St Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 5 Emerald St Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 5 Fairview Ave Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 7 Fairview Ave Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 7 Fairview Ave Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 7 Federal Way Gowen Rd (SH 21) Broadway Ave(US 20/26) 5 Five Mile Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 5 Five Mile Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 5 Floating Feather Rd Palmer Ln Linder Rd 3 Floating Feather Rd Linder Rd Park Ln 3 Floating Feather Rd Park Ln Ballantyne Ln 3 Franklin Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 5 Franklin Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 5 Franklin Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 5 Gary Ln State St(SH 44) Hill Rd 3 Harrison Blvd Hays St Hill Rd 2 Hays St 16th St 15th St 2 Hill Rd Horseshoe Bend Rd Duncan Ln 5 King Rd Swan Falls Rd Meridian Rd 3 King Rd Meridian Rd Stroebel Rd 3 Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-13 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Street From To MSM Lane Constraint King Rd Stroebel Rd Locust Grove Rd 3 Lake Hazel Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 5 Lake Hazel Rd Cole Rd Orchard St 5 Linder Rd Cherry Ln Ustick Rd 5 Locust Grove Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 3 Locust Grove Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 5 Locust Grove Rd McMillan Rd Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) 3 Maple Grove Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 5 Maple Grove Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 5 McMillan Rd Star Rd McDermott Rd 3 McMillan Rd McDermott Rd Black Cat Rd 3 McMillan Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 3 McMillan Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 3 McMillan Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 3 McMillan Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 3 Meridian Rd Cherry Ln Ustick Rd 5 Meridian Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 3 Overland Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 7 Overland Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 7 Pine Ave Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 3 State St Glenwood St Pierce Park Ln 7* State St Pierce Park Ln Collister Dr 7* State St Collister Dr Veterans Memorial Pkwy 7* State St Veterans Memorial 27th St 7* Pkwy Ustick Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 5 Ustick Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 5 Ustick Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 5 Ustick Rd Cole Rd Curtis Rd 4 Victory Rd Black Cat Rd Ten Mile Rd 3 Victory Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 3 Victory Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd (SH 69) 3 Victory Rd Meridian Rd (SH 69) Locust Grove Rd 3 Victory Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 3 Victory Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 5 Victory Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 5 Victory Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 5 *State Street lane configuration in CIP consistent with the State Street Transit and Operations Plan.One lane in each direction is exclusive to HOV/transit operations. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-14 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Figure 3: 2040 Congested Road Segments Constrained in Master Street Map W+E ii—IIER Ru 20 6 rnM10.m in �I�gMIJ Rd UUMR-.' M 110 A Constrained Segments 2040 Constrained Arterials Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-1 5 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C A summary of existing and future travel characteristics are provided in Table 10, including vehicle miles traveled and lane miles of congestion. Many more ACHD routes will operate below LOS planning thresholds in the future even with the projects listed in this plan. VMT is expected to increase by more than 50% in Ada County between 2020 and 2040. The level of congestion on the ACHD arterial and ITD roadway network will grow dramatically, more so on the minor arterials than principal arterials or collector streets. Table 10:Ada County Travel Characteristics for Base and Future Networks Street Classes Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT) Lane Miles of Congestion 2020 2040 2020 2040 Principal Arterial 167,597 285,934 7.44 45.71 Minor Arterial 204,166 346,558 32.73 143.14 Collector 39,014 64,997 0.48 4.80 ITD State Roads 385,207 535,041 31.06 94.69 Total 795,983 1,232,530 71.71 288.34 Source: Regional Travel Demand Model and Communities in Motion 2040 2.0—Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan Section I: Funding Sources Available §67-8208 The 2016 ACHD Strategic Plan estimated ACHD's projected revenues for the time period of 2016- 2035. In general,ACHD receives transportation revenues from property taxes, Highway User Fund (gas taxes), Ada County vehicle registration fees,traffic impact fees, occasional Federal Aid (project-specific funding with Federal assistance), and sales tax. ACHD administers its annual revenues to fund the operation and capital improvement program needs within the district. During the years 2021-2040,ACHD anticipates approximately$3,068 million in revenue (adjusted for inflation and excluding traffic impact fee revenues) of which $1,870million will be directed towards maintenance &operations and $1,198 million to capital projects. ACHD's capital projects programs may include improvements to safety, capacity, system efficiency, and suitability for alternative modes of travel (walking, biking, and transit). Each enhancement project includes a review of appropriate improvements for alternative modes based on the specific characteristics and context of the roadway and surrounding land uses including sidewalks, bike lanes and support of transit service and/or future service. ACHD capital projects programs include: ❖ Roadway and intersection reconstruction and new construction projects ❖ Bridges — Bridge replacements, widening, and bridge maintenance and safety improvements ❖ Traffic — ITS and traffic safety projects ❖ Capital Maintenance Projects — overlays and rebuilds ❖ Community Programs ❖ Miscellaneous — Cooperative projects and other projects that do not fit into project categories identified above Adopted August 79, 2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-16 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Of the $1,198 million in capital improvement revenues, shown in Figure 4, approximately $597.5 million will be available for CIP projects (non-impact fee eligible costs) as well as a combined $600.3 million from other programs during the years 2021-2040 as shown in Figure 5. Figure 4:ACHD 2021-2040 Revenue Projection ACHD 2021-2040 Revenue Projection (in Millions) Available for Capital Projects $1,198 39% Maintenance & Operations $1,870 61% Adopted August 19,2020 —Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-17 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C Figure 5:ACHD 2021-2040 Capital Projects Revenue Allocations ACHD 2021-2040 Revenue Allocations for Capital Projects (in Millions) Bridges $60.4 5% Traffic $15.9 1% Available Revenue for CIP Capital Projects Maintenance $597.5 Projects 50% $442.1 37% Stormwater and -Community Miscellaneous Programs $11.9 $70.0 1% 6% Section J: Intergovernmental Agreements §67-8208 ACHD will enter into intergovernmental agreements to fund multi jurisdictional transportation improvement projects. It is ACHD's practice and planned intent to fund the local share of multi- jurisdiction system improvements with: (a) revenues other than traffic impact fees for those local improvements included in the CIP but are not TIF-eligible; and (b)traffic impact fees only for the portion of local improvements which are TIF-eligible and included within the CIP. Section K: Schedule §67-8208 ACHD will program funding for the design and construction of future transportation system improvements in five-year increments based on priority and ability to match TIF revenues with other funding. A method of ranking the relative priority of projects was utilized in as part of the criteria in designating projects for the unfunded list to balance project costs to available revenues, as well as to program the projects into five-year increments. The prioritization methodology includes measures that focus on relieving congestion as well as coordinating with future land use plans and goals. These measures include: 1) projects located on mobility or principal arterials score higher since improvements to these roadways help alleviate pressure on parallel routes; 2) projects on transit routes score higher since a higher frequency of transit service equates to fewer vehicles on the road reducing demand on the road network; and 3) the land use agencies transportation priorities. The land use agencies' prioritization of CIP projects provides a means to plan roadway improvements with municipal infrastructure improvements (sewer, parks, etc.) which minimizes the impacts to the public, decreases the cost to the public agencies (concurrent construction) and is an indicator of future Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-18 ACHD 2020 Capital Improvements Plan Exhibit C growth. This category is not limited strictly to municipal infrastructure planning since there are other parameters the land use agencies consider relative to transportation planning, such as economic development or neighborhood connectivity. For each of the CIP projects listed in Attachment A there is a corresponding estimated schedule for construction of the improvement listed under"Year." Tables A-3 and A-4 sort the CIP projects by year of construction. Adopted August 79, 2020 -Amended July 27, 2022 Page C-19 Priority Corridors FY2024-2028 IFYWP Status ® z z FEATHER-RD 3 » } wz H y $ T mo z 5 ym�.m \ LLLE- R § , � , mEA. C2 m 9 ƒ / @ -6 . m= \ j ( g § g 2 $ ± ) I EN AV E s E,E LD- » , eRANKUN-RD Lij Ra E �4 \ - LU § " I Q % > e = i 02 j wT-� I.Z. ( U — RD - pIT a � moRlo i mre uon ( rEab >. ® % ] C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Topic on the City Council Workshop Agenda From: Caleb Hood Meeting Date: June 11, 2024 Topic: ACHD Master Street Map Changes -Arterial Corridor Preservation ACHD is contemplating changes to the Master Street Map/Plan and is seeking City input. In the past,the City has requested that ACHD plan to preserve for section line arterials to accommodate at least five (5) travel lanes. Today, there are still some segments of section-line roadways that ACHD is only planning to preserve for three (3) travel lanes, or approximately seventy feet (70') of right-of-way. During the last few Meridian Transportation Commission (TC) meetings (April, May and June),the TC discussed the ACHD Master Street Plan, Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and received a summary from Staff of recent communications the City had with ACHD on preserving for more than 3-lanes on section-line arterial roadways.A five-lane roadway requires approximately one hundred feet (100') of total right-of-way. During the June 3ra TC meeting, the TC voted to recommend to Council requesting changes to the ACHD Master Street Map/Plan. The requested changes affect the ultimate right-of-way preservation for several arterials in Meridian and our Planning Area including: McMillan Road corridor,the Victory Road corridor, and segments of Locust Grove Road, Meridian Road and Overland Road. During the June 111h workshop, Staff will walk through the Master Street Map and discuss potential change requests with Council. Here is a link to the Master Street Plan/Map: https:[/www.achdidaho.org/nrojects/achd- plans/master-street-plan W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 24-2054: An ordinance (Reveille Ridge Subdivision — H-2023- 0050) annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 59.97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (34.69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-033001 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=11 MATT BUNK 06/20/2024 08:38 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2054 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION—H-2023-0050) ANNEXING A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; REZONING 59.97 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RUT (RURAL URBAN TRANSITION) TO R-8 (34.69 ACRES) (MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND R-15 (25.28 ACRES) (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICTS; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS,the City of Meridian received a written request from property owner Endurance Holdings, LLC to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Subject Property"), which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS,the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222(2)to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 59.97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (34.69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (25.28 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning Districts. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION H-2023-0050 Page I SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,this 18th day of June , 2024. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 18th day of June , 2024. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this18th day of June ,2024,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration: 3-28-2028 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION H-2023-0050 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY. William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho , hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . I ' William L. M . Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2054 An ordinance (Reveille Ridge Subdivision — H-2023 - 0050) annexing a parcel of land located in the south half of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 5 , Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho , more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 59 . 97 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R- 8 (34 . 69 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R45 (25 .28 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts ; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances , and providing an effective date . A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B . ] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION 1-1-202MO50 Page 4 EXHIBIT A Description for Annexation September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00012'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 00012'47" West, 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, South 00012'47" West, 250.04 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26"West, 560.00 feet; thence North 89018'26" West, 500.00 feet; thence South 89°48'34" West, 841.23 feet to the north-south centerline of said Section 5; thence on said north-south centerline, North 00000'59" East, 332.88 feet to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 5; thence continuing on said north-south centerline, North 00001'18" East, 820.62 feet; thence leaving said north-south centerline, South 78030'03" East, 191.66 feet; thence North 43000'19" East, 108.41 feet; thence North 68036'36" East, 694.84 feet; thence South 46002'32" East, 379.56 feet; thence South 64059'21" East, 64.51 feet; thence North 00023'06" West, 30.48 feet to the Southwest corner of Keep Subdivision as filled in Book 119 of Plats at Pages 18374 through 18379, records of Ada County, Idaho; �NIm- L ANO thence on the south boundary line of said Keep 5� �GENS `r F 6` Subdivision the following eight (8) courses and distances: 11 79 ox South 64048" 0" East, 66.24 feet; N,9ls�Z3 r° �OO9TF O F South 79033'09" East, 55.80 feet; yM McCpk Page 1 of 2 North 82037'38" East, 39.29 feet; North 71°27'43" East, 41.47 feet; North 80045'02" East, 58.56 feet; North 88058'42" East, 252.30 feet; North 85038'16" East, 60.03 feet; North 67003'39" East, 125.97 feet to the northwest corner of Derry Subdivision as filled in Book 108 of Plats at Pages 15160 and 15161, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence South 00013'22" West, 1157.89 feet to the southwest corner of said Derry Subdivision thence on the south boundary line of said Derry Subdivision and the easterly prolongation of, South 74008'45" East, 762.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 59.969 acres, more or less. End of Description. D GE NsF sG 11779 8�2,23� �0p9TF O F yM MCCN Page 2 of 2 Description for R-8 Zone September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00°12'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 00012'47" West, 458.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, South 00012'47" West, 250.04 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26"West, 408.38 feet; thence North 47047'31"West, 770.77 feet; thence North 42012'29" East, 255.28 feet; thence 169.79 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 32°25'39", and a long chord which bears North 64°00'20" West, 167.53 feet; thence North 47047'31" West, 512.02 feet; thence 46.08 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 26°24'07", and a long chord which bears North 34035'27" West, 45.67 feet; thence North 21°23'24" West, 28.22 feet; thence South 68036'36" West, 166.53 feet; thence 8.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 04035'37", and a long chord which bears South 66018'47" West, 8.02 feet; thence North 47047'31" West, 150.16 feet; thence North 43000'19" East, 21.57 feet; Or1Pp- LANA \GE N sty SG thence North 68036'36" East, 694.84 feet; 1 thence South 46002'32" East, 379.56 feet; 779/t�Z3�� thence South 64059'21" East, 64.51 feet; c�0O9TF OF \�PO� YM MCCP�`� Page 1 of 2 thence North 00°23'06" West, 30.48 feet to the Southwest corner of Keep Subdivision as filled in Book 119 of Plats at Pages 18374 through 18379, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on the south boundary line of said Keep Subdivision the following eight (8) courses and distances: South 64048'10" East, 66.24 feet; South 79033'09" East, 55.80 feet; North 82037'38" East, 39.29 feet; North 71°27'43" East, 41.47 feet; North 80045'02" East, 58.56 feet; North 88058'42" East, 252.30 feet; North 85038'16" East, 60.03 feet; North 67003'39" East, 125.97 feet to the northwest corner of Derry Subdivision as filled in Book 108 of Plats at Pages 15160 and 15161, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence South 00013'22" West, 1157.89 feet to the southwest corner of said Derry Subdivision thence on the south boundary line of said Derry Subdivision and the easterly prolongation of, South 74008'45" East, 762.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 34.691 acres, more or less. End of Description. �NNk- L ANO �GENSF `rG 1 779 c) 'A 8�2oz3P0 OF YM MCCN Page 2 of 2 Description for R-15 Zone September 8, 2023 A parcel of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 4 and 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the Section corner common to Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, T.2.N., R.1.E, B.M., bears South 00012'47" West, 2653.27; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 5, South 000 12'47" West, 708.15 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 74008'26" West, 800.00 feet; thence North 73029'26" West, 408.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 73029'26" West, 151.62 feet thence North 89018'26" West, 500.00 feet; thence South 89048'34" West, 841.23 feet to the north-south centerline of said Section 5; thence on said north-south centerline, North 00000'59" East, 332.88 feet to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 5; thence continuing on said north-south centerline, North 00001'18" East, 820.62 feet; thence leaving said north-south centerline, South 78030'03" East, 191.66 feet; thence North 43°00'19" East, 86.84 feet; thence South 47047'31" East, 150.16 feet; thence 8.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 04°35'37", and a long chord which bears North 66018'47" East, 8.02 feet; thence North 68036'36" East, 166.53 feet; thence South 21°23'24" East, 28.22 feet; thence 46.08 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of �NPt- LAN� 26024'07", and a long chord which bears South �GENSF `S 34035'27" East, 45.67 feet; o thence South 47047'31" East, 512.02 feet; 11 79 o N.A z3,r C�p 91 F OF yM McCIN, Page 1 of 2 thence 169.79 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 32°25'39", and a long chord which bears South 64000'20" East, 167.53 feet; thence South 42012'29" West, 255.28 feet; thence South 47047'31" East, 770.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 25.278 acres, more or less. End of Description. �Np,L L ANO 5� �GENSF S 11779 (� z �00 9 F F yM MCCN Page 2 of 2 I I Keep Subdivision 9426 LIS L7 L10 N� s' F L8 1-11 L2 �� L4 L5� L12 L9 CV tU O N l rn I a0 LU I� 00 Ln oDerry o f59.969 Acres N Subdivision z � I 0 0 C1/4 1/4 • w S.5 .S.4 0 M Point of 106 z M 500.00' S S74 08�45,F�snning LO S89'48'34"W 841.23' N89'18'26"W 60 00, 4S• i N7 329 I _ I N 74 08'26"w J 800 00 Line Table Line Table N I I � I Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length L() I �.c L1 S00'12'47"W 250.04' L8 N82'37'38"E 39.29' N (D 00 L2 S78'30'03"E 191.66' L9 N71'27'43"E 41.47' w a N r- o L3 N43'00'19"E 108.41' L10 N80'45'02"E 58.56' o I � N•� L4 S64'59'21"E 64.51' L11 N88'58'42"E 252.30' w I °� p m () p L5 N00'23'06"W 30.48' L12 N85'38'16"E 60.03' N L6 S64'48'10"E 66.24' L13 N67-03'39"E 125.97' L7 S79'33'09"E 55.80' I I I I g�ONAL LqNO s - —- - - - :•. AGE NSF 11 79 N�l8 O Z(� Znz3 ,r r E. Columbia Rd. S.5 '."S. :S.4 0F OF � p? 1 d Scale: 1"=400' - - - - - -S.8 • S.9 M. MCCP►M 0 100 200 400 800 P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eagle Rd) 22-228\dwg\Annexotion Ex.dwg 9/8/2023 7:39:32 AM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. DAHO 22-228-02 SURVEY 9955 W.EMERALD ST Annexation Sheet No. n; BOISE,IDAHO83704 (208)846-8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP, LLC A pracel of land located in the S1 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., ME., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023 I I Keep aA, SA Subdivision �6 36 E -N ��� L7 L4 Ng8 S6,,�F L8 L11 L2 L9 L12 L5 L6 L13 O�' L10 C3 S68'36'36"W O 166.53' cl� Derry N42'12'29"E C/ N Subdivision 255.28' Acres l _ 0 0 C1/4 �j,� 1/4• S.5 .S.4 �j Point of �>j, S7408, Beginning 45" ice. 408 38. 762.45• N732g2s" N 74 08 26"w 800.00J . i� N Nv) ��CENSF `r G Line Table Line Table (0 QLine Bearing Length Line Bearing Length a] � v- 1 a 7 7 9 L1 S00'12'47"W 250.04' L8 S79'33'09"E 55.80' , N N� g�COZ3.ro & � N L2 N21'23'24"W 28.22' L9 N82'37'38"E 39.29' �° 1 - o 4fOF �M�p� L3 N47'47'31"W 150.16' L10 N71'27'43"E 41.47' O m MICA In o) L4 N43'00'19"E 21.57' L11 N80'45'02"E 58.56' L5 S64'59'21"E 64.51' L12 N88'58'42"E 252.30' N Scale: 1"=400' L6 N00'23'06"W 30.48' L13 N85'38'16"E 60.03' I 0 100 200 400 800 1 L7 S64'48'10"E 66.24' L14 N67'03'39"E 125.97' Curve Table i Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 169.79' 300.00' 32'25'39" N64'00'20"W 167.53' E. Columbia Rd. S.5 S.4 C2 46.08' 100.00' 26'24'07" N34'35'27"W 45.67' S.8 S.9 C3 8.02' 100.00' 4'35'37" S66-18'47"W 8.02' P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eogle Rd) 22-228\dwg\R-8 Zone Ez.dwg 9/8/2023 8:45:53 AM IDAHO Exhibit Drawin^gQfor 22Job No. o2 SURVEY 9OSE, AHO83704ERALD R—S Zone 9955 W.EM083704 Sheet No. (208)846-8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP LLC A pracel of land located in the S1 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date ' the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023 I Keep Subdivision I I I L2\.y �R 5 L6 C1 S [p 5r 04 00 Derry o f 25 278 Subdivision z I Acres S42'12'29"W I / 255.28' C1/4 SAS), 1/4• w ��,, S.5 .S.4 O o0 F> p M O) O M z /.500,00' I in S89'48'34"W 841.23' N89'18'26"W L� 408 8 100 Beginning f N�32g 26-g, I g g N74 08 26"W 8p0,pp, I� CV cn OVAL LANp r i Q' �\GENS `r Line Table N v 1 779 O Line Bearing Length �m .- Of P g�2oZ3�o L1 N73'29'26"W 151.62' N � o oI cn It —(n C'O 9rF OF L2 S78'30'03"E 191.66' w I rn o 0 OyM, McCA L3 N43'00'19"E 86.84' vi I o m L4 S47'47'31"E 150.16' L5 N68'36'36"E 166.53' N Scale: 1"=400' L6 S21'23'24"E 28.22' 1 0 100 200 400 800 Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chard Bearing Chord Length C1 8.02' 100.00' 4'35'37" N66'18'47"E 8.02' E. Columbi and. C2 46.08' 100.00' 26'24'07" S34'35'27"E 45.67' C3 169.79' 300.00' 32'25'39" 1 S64'00'20"E 167.53' P:\Reveille Ridge(7355 Eogle Rd) 22-228\dwg\R-15 Zone EK.dwg 9/8/2023 8:56:41 AM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. DA H O Zone 22—228—02 SURVEY 9OSE,EMERALD R-1 ZOIIG Sheet No. BOISE,IDAHO 83704 (201)846-8570 Reveille Ridge Subdivision 1 GROUP, LLC A pracel of land located in the S1 2 of the NE1 4 & the N1 2 of Dwg. Date the SE1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 9/8/2023