HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-16
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL I ACHD COMMISSION
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING I WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
Meridian City Hall
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
X David Wynkoop X Susan Eastlake
X Sherry Huber X David Bivens
X President John Franden
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan: Discussed
4. Discussion of Storm Water Retention Ponds - Maintenance and
Landscape Issues: Discussed
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - November 16,2004
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Page 1 of 1
December 30, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
January 4, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-A
REQUEST Approve Minutes of November 16, 2004 City Council and ACHD Commission
Joint Meeting / Workshop
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~v>>
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Phone:
Meridian City Council & ACHD Commission Meetinq
November 16. 2004
The Meridian City Council and ACHD Commission Joint Meeting I Workshop was
called to order at 5:30 P.M. on Tuesday, November 16, 2004 by Mayor Tammy
de Weerd and ACHD Commission President John Franden
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle,
Christine Donnell, Charlie Rountree.
Others Present: Will Berg
ACHD Commission Members Present: John Franden, David Wynkoop, Dave
Bivens, Sherry Hubert and Susan Eastlake
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Christine Donnell
X Shaun Wardle
X Keith Bird
X Charlie Rountree
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
x
De Weerd: I will just make note for the record that Councilman Bird,
Councilmember Donnell, Councilman Wardle and Councilman Rountree are all
present as well as Mayor De Weerd. Do you need to open it for your record?
Wynkoop: I will just note for your record since you do a transcript that we have
here myself as 1 sl Vice President and Commissioner Bivens and Commissioner
Hubert and I presume that Commissioner Franden will be here momentarily.
Here he is, just walked in. So we are all present and accounted for.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
De Weerd: The first item is to adopt the agenda, that's just a technicality.
Bird: So moved.
Wardle: Second.
De Weerd: All in favor say aye.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 3.
Discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan:
De Weerd: I will ask Anna to give us an overview.
Meridian City Council & F\ D Commission Meeting
Novem ber 16, 2004
Page 2 of 19
Canning: Madame Mayor, members of the Council and Commissioners. As staff
we did meet to discuss the (inaudible) conditions for the North Meridian Area
Plan and to kind of brainstorm on possible solutions. I think (inaudible -----------)
in your package and I have got up here (inaudible ----------). Basically, the
decision was that -
De Weerd: Anna? I am sorry, but if you could come and stand-
Canning: No problem.
De Weerd: If you would like you can sit here.
Canning: I am situated. Would you like me to start over?
De Weerd: Yes.
Canning: The staff did meet. It was Gary Inselman, Bruce, (lnaudible) and Brad
and I and I forget who from my staff was there. That's pretty bad, huh? We met
to brainstorm on what possible solutions we could have and what to do with the
open (lnaudible) condition from the North Meridian Area Plan and out of that we
decided a couple of key things. The one would be to acknowledge that really the
improvements would need to be done through the capital improvement plan and
they explain that that update will begin in about a year and that ACHD will be
looking for better demographic numbers for Meridian and North Meridian in
particular and make that a priority to really evaluate those demographics
pertaining to that area. Then also for intersections would receive higher priority
and the new capital improvements plan that they would be separated from the
roadway improvements as separate items and that would allow for your staff
(inaudible---------) this is my limited understanding is that because we are adding
the intersection improvement as part of the capital improvement plan that puts off
the need for as much road-wide need and so, therefore, there is a savings on the
amount of roadway, right of way that you have to purchase and that also can go
more toward the intersection improvements as well. So, I think it is kind of a
double benefit by adding these intersections, as I understand it. Then they also
ask that sidewalks - they will be looking to change the policy manual, I believe,
that require that the sidewalks be in easements, not in the right of way. We
require detached sidewalks so most of the time they are in easements and that
would allow ACHD to not have to purchase as much right of way because the
sidewalks would be an existing landscape buffer easements, which we have
three generous landscape buffers in the first place so that they could be
accommodated within those buffers. So, that's on the ACHD side. On the
planning staff side or the City of Meridian staff side, we asked for a couple of
things. That was during the development (inaudible) through ACHD, we were
hoping that we could get kind of an indication of the intersections that were
impacted by the development and how those intersection, how they rated in with
just within the City of Meridian CIP, so you have got on your CIP - you have got
Meridian City Council & i .D Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 3 of 19
in your plan a number of intersections, one through one hundred for the whole
county and maybe there is thirty of them that are for Meridian. Well, if the
development application came through and the intersection was ranked 30
overall, but it was our highest number, then if your staff could let us know that
information - you know, that this is the most important intersection for the City of
Meridian and these are identified in that as well as identified where it warrants
then I think that means whether it warrants a (inaudible). So, your staff felt that
they could provide us that information and then that would help the City Council
understand what options may be available for working with the developer to get
some of those improvements done maybe before hand. We understand that you
all can't require those intersection improvements necessarily at their - depending
on the timing, but they could be discussed as part of a request for annexation by
the City of Meridian, so if we just had that information it would be a powerful tool
for the city to use. I think that was it on the North Meridian Area Plan. Yeah, that
was it.
De Weerd: Now Anna we did have this discussion at Council last week and staff
was asked to look into a couple of things further.
Canning: Yes, the primary one was the open-ended commission for the North
Meridian Area Plan and Bill Nary has done that research and I think I will let him
discuss that. Do you have that email from Brad? I don't have it.
Nary: I didn't bring that with me. I am sorry. Madame Mayor, members of the
Council and members of the Commission what the Council asked me to look at
was on that condition that took place in the development agreement over the last
couple of years and the effectiveness of that tool and being able to use it as
enforcement. Probably from a legal standpoint, it's written pretty broadly and the
reason was that I think some of the Council members and some of the
Commissioners will recall is that we really didn't know what we were getting into.
At the time, we were in the development stages of the North Meridian Plan, we
had a fairly large (inaudible) group with it and all we were intending was to create
at least a mechanism to bring people to the table to have discussions about the
exact same things that we have been able to successfully get them to do and
being able to get better roadway improvements, get better right of way, get better
access, all of the things that that's what it was intended to do. Could we use it as
an enforcement mechanism now? It appears that I think policy wise that the
Highway District has taken some steps in how they're approaching in both the
capital improvement plan and the, I guess, policies and choices that you folks
have made and really the mechanism that really drives that condition. Again, it's
pretty broad, but really it gives the city a hammer to enforce development to the
table to have conversations with you folks and I think that's already happening
and has happened over the last couple of years and so whether or not it's a
continuing necessity to have those in future developments, it probably isn't,
unless we had specificity of what exactly we want or you want, again, it's written
so broadly, but there was a reason for that. At the time, we had a group that sort
Meridian City Council & A D Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 4 of 19
of has dissolved and now we are looking at other things, like the blueprint for
growth or we are looking for other ways to attack those same concerns and
issues and so I think we are getting there, but legally and whether or not we want
to use that as a real enforcement tool, it's probably not the most effective way to
win anything, it's just on that conditional loan because there is not a lot of
specificity to it that I could take to a developer and say see this tells you you
need to do something. All it does is it tells you you need to talk to the people that
are involved and that's really what the direction gives, so my recommendation
would be not to use that as the basis of anything other than what we have been,
which is to get some dialogue going, to get some cooperation and I think we
have been able to do that and I think the Highway District has as well for the
same reason, but as an enforcement tool it's probably not the most effective way
to do it.
De Weerd: I guess my question for (inaudible) is then we need to drop them out
of those findings or look and see if we can bring the original developers to the
table to say can we get these intersections improved even though they are not on
the CIP at this time.
Nary: Madame Mayor, members of the Council certainly that is your option. I
mean they are existing in the development agreements now -
De Weerd: And then (inaudible) is the North Meridian Area Plan
recommendation.
Nary: Right. I think if you would get them you would have some more specifics
or you have, especially with the larger developments along the North Meridian
Area, it's probably a good tool for that dialogue to happen. It's not a real good
tool to go to court and make it happen in that regard, it's more of a way to get
that cooperation and to the table.
De Weerd: So, would ACHD be willing to at least give this one last try by getting
all the people to the table and see if we can get any solution like intersection
improvements via -I don't know a special assessment or something.
Speaker?: Who would be the group canal, you know the original meetings were
one set of people? Are those - I know some of them would likely still be there,
but they had their own set of motives that you know may have changed over
time, so do we have an idea of a possible group of who you would bring to the
table? Would it be anybody that's gone through on that development that has
the (inaudible)?
De Weerd: I would think that it would be the developers who have that open
ended finding in their development agreements and the larger ones. The Bridge
Towers, the Paramount, the Lochsa, the Cedar Springs and those developers
just to find out - the condition doesn't do a whole lot of good for their
,.-
Meridian City Council & A D Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 5 of 19
developments either and when we originally were talking about it, it was also a
marketing tool for them not looking at necessarily widening the roads at that time,
but trying to find ways that we could have some improvements done. They
talked about improvements, not having to do curb, gutters sidewalk, having
detached - you know they could at least do some road improvements to widen it
with turn lanes and stuff, but without all the final touches that are required almost
in every instance and then also looking at intersection improvements that would
facilitate moving traffic. I think that's where we start. John?
Franden: (Inaudible---------) as something you wanted to share with us here.
De Weerd: If you could come over here so we could get you in record.
Speaker?: Mr. President, Madame Mayor I would suggest that if we were to
invite a group of landowners or developers to the table, since we are talking an
extraordinary impact fee for a normally district that's assessed over an area and
not to a specific development. We should invite all of the landowners in the
designated area and developers and see who comes and discussion (inaudible)
and then (inaudible).
De Weerd: That would be most appropriate. Thank you.
Speaker: Madame Mayor what keeps going through my head and Bill can
probably help us here, but it's offsite improvements that what we are really
talking about in these intersections are offsite improvements, which we just can't
do.
Hubert: But the city is going to require them.
De Weerd: That's our - it's our finding in the development agreement and it
seemed like when we started this process several years ago. There was interest
from the development community in looking at that. I don't know what that
interest is now, the interest was driven, yes, then by the possibility that they
wouldn't get their developments approved, but now that traffic does exist out
there, they might have still motivation in helping improve the circulation of that.
It's always worth a try.
Franden: Absolutely. The other thing that has been running through my mind is
we are looking at the expiration of the vehicle registration fee in a few years and I
thought is that our intersections something that when we go out for the renewal
of that because I know Commissioner Hubert and others say that you know if we
improve these intersections that we can move traffic. It's almost beneficial in
widening the road in some instances. Just as an idea. Just to throw in that
thought out.
Meridian City Council & A D Commission Meeting (
November 16, 2004 .
Page 6 of 19
Bird: Madame Mayor when is registration? Because you the State of Idaho is
one of the most reasonable vehicle registration states there is. I mean, we are,
in fact ridiculous compared to our neighboring states.
Franden: Keith, if I am not incorrect, I think Ada County is the only county that
has that.
Bird: I think that is right.
De Weerd: Are there any other comments?
Hubert: Yes, if e go ahead and have some kind of group meeting, I would
suggest based on and Dave was there too at a lot of the meetings that before we
even contact people really get our eggs lined up because if we go in there and
we do the same song and dance then they are going to feel like it's a waste of
their time, so it seems to me that we need to sit down maybe first, ourselves and
brainstorm and see if there is a gimme that we can come up with that they are
going to get something if they are willing to do it and that's always the hard part,
but I think it'll fail again if we don't, in my view, if we don't come up with
something.
Rountree: Madame Mayor. I am still struggling with what's our expectation of
getting together. I mean we really expect the development community to step up
to the plate and say we want to do this or we want a partner to do this and make
it happen.
De Weerd: I don't know. I guess I have always been of the opinion that unless
you ask you never know and I don't have a problem asking, but I do agree that
we need to have a plan. And even if it's just a couple of key intersections and we
have been working with staff on identifying those key intersections. If we could
show how those improvements would benefit the whole area and with the cost
and with the lodge remaining what that would mean in terms of an impact fee if
that's the road we are going down and then they have information and say yeah
we would be willing to talk about it or not.
Donnell: Because everybody that has to come to the meeting (inaudible) and
pay money.
Rountree: That was the point I was going to make. Do we really need to have a
meeting to find that out? Could we put (inaudible ----) another way? Just phone
up for folks and say are you going to warm to this concept? Because it's in your
development agreement.
De Weerd: And I would be willing to make those phone calls. I guess I would
ask that our staffs would get together and talk about how minimally best we can
Meridian City Council & j 10 Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 7 of 19
accommodate the traffic in the North Meridian Area and put a price tag to it and I
can make some phone calls. Because we are not basking.
Bird: One point I was going to bring up was that most of the developers that
developed out there were the ones that put the money up to do this North
Meridian study. I am like Charlie, I mean, we need to have a plan as ACHD and
City of Meridian, but getting the - I think you can make some phone calls. They
have planned on having to do this and then we fell on our face. So, I don't think
it's unreasonable. I am like Tammy I am afraid to ask because it's basically the
same players out there that did the original North Meridian plan.
De Weerd: Commissioner Bivens.
Bivens: Mayor case and point, the one that I think we identify is the top priority
for intersection improvement - this is Linder and Ustick and according to the map
over here, that is unincorporated at least as it shows on the map it's not annexed
into the city and maybe that might be worth taking time to (inaudible) that.
Bird: The northwest corner - that's that one that had -
Bivens: According to the map, all them corners are-
Bird: I know the other three are (inaudible --------).
Bivens: Anyway, that would be helpful to make sure that we do have that and
(inaudible----------). We have moved it up, but not fast enough as far as I am
concerned.
De Weerd: Any other comments? I guess I would ask that our staff set up a
meeting together and talk about how best we can prioritize the intersection
improvements and make it minimal and see what price tag we put to it and I can
just start making some phone calls. Maybe at one of our Pre-Councils or one of
your pre-meetings staff can present it, get any further comments before I start
making phone calls.
Donnell: I don't know if this will help. Remember the idea that a lease was -
came out that in some cities that are moving drainage and (inaudible) got to do it
in the watering and so I don't know if we would have enough time to check into
that, if there would be even an advantage to a developer. If we had that option,
that would be more cost effective; meaning, that if we can give them a new idea
that we think is cost effective that's kind of an exchange and it's not likely they
are going to be able to get all their subdivision (inaudible). Is there something
that we can come up with like that? And maybe we have to (inaudible-----------).
(Inaudible discussion)
Meridian City Council & A D Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 8 of 19
De Weerd: Well, I think what staff did come up with in their discussions and
preserving right away and along the detached sidewalks and easements where
there have been right of ways and looking for future (inaudible) needs and it's an
excellent way and our staff can really work with that. So, those are the kind of
things that if our staffs can work together and we know what we can be looking
out for, we certainly ought to do that because it benefits us in the long run in
terms of making it easier to get these things done. So, encourage creativity and
innovation and Meridian just says yeah.
Wardle: Madame Mayor.
De Weerd: Councilman Wardle.
Wardle: I guess I am unclear as to what we are going to be asking the
development community. What I understand intersection improvement and then
I have heard that you may not need to widen the roadway. Does that mean that
on some of these roadways, for example Under and Ustick a short-term solution
might be not to go to two travel lanes, a turn lane and a right turn lane, but
maybe to make two travel lanes as well as just a center turn lane? Are those
kind of the things we are talking about or are we talking about planning for the
future to make the entire roadway happen?
De Weerd: I think probably both, Shaun. The first item that Anna had talked
about was to look at future road needs and start preserving the corridors and not
asking them to dedicate it, but setting it aside that we would require that the curb,
gutter and sidewalk would be required, but the sidewalk could be detached and
put in an easement rather than the right of way so that the future growth
requirement could be done at a later date.
Wardle: But these off site developments that we are talking about, floating the
idea of an additional impact fee of some sort. What would that be going to?
Would that be gOing to purchase the right of way or would that be going to
signalization of the intersections?
De Weerd: I guess Shaun in my opinion that would be going to getting those
intersection improvements in now rather than later.
Wardle: Okay. That was one of my comments is if we are going to take
something to the development community they are going to want to know as part
of our plan, they are going to want to know what it's going to be that is going to
be accomplished and when. I think those are things that we need to answer
before, at least In theory before we get (inaudible).
De Weerd: That's true. Bruce, did you have a comment?
Meridian City Council & J 10 CommissIon Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 9 of 19
Mills: Yes, Madame Mayor, Commissioners, Council members. I just wanted to
clarify on the intersections. Basically, you can signalize the intersections and get
all the turn lanes associated with that intersection and typically you can delay and
widen the road from whatever direction from that intersection for several year.
You still eventually are going to have to put in additional lanes, but it can buy you
quite a bit of time.
Wardle: Just a follow up question. We are looking at a four-way intersection with
two travel lanes, eight travel lanes in a circle. Are you just talking about adding a
center turn lane or also a right hand turn lane?
Mills: Wouldn't have to actually be analyzed, but it would basically no doubt be
adding a left turn lane, probably at all four assu,ming they had (inaudible----)
graphic at all four lanes in the intersection and whether or not it needed
additional right turn lanes would have to be looked at. That would at least have
some capacity. If you just went out there and put a signal out there without
adding turn lanes, you really are not adding a lot of capacity. You need to get
additional lanes. The money, jf we did look at the scenario would have to go
towards purchasing the right of way to widen out that along with the signal
(inaudible) or additional lanes.
Speaker?: Madame Mayor. I guess my thought and I struggled with this
(inaudible) with staff, but to me the bottom line makes good sense. You plan
what your future needs are going to be and build the intersection to
accommodate that and do it when you are in the process rather than kind of
Mickey Mousing that thing along and putting band aids on it. To me it makes a
lot more sense. You get all the wiring and all the conduit and all the electrical
service that it needs to come to those intersections where they put in the signals.
To me you just want to do it right while you are doing it and have it fixed for the
future.
De Weerd: Okay, I am not going to be formal.
Wynkoop?: Maybe I can bring this to a conclusion here. I appreciate your
philosophy because there is a diverse that says ask and you shall receive, you
do not receive because you have not asked and so to follow that philosophy, I
think it's worth asking one more time. That said, now let me put on my --
economics was my course of study at college so let me put on that hat for a
second. In my opinion, we put together this North Meridian Planning effort and at
that point it was in the interest of the developers involved to come up with kind of
a vague feel good statement, so that they could get underway with (inaudible -----
----) process because I think they knew that based upon the Washington Group
Study that we had done, that there would be some heartburn if they didn't at least
offer some olive branches and I thought that that was an excellent start. In the
end I think we at ACHD were disappointed with the outcome because as we
feared at the beginning did not have any tangible help or solutions for us. So,
Meridian City Council & j ID Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 10 of 19
then we went to the general statement that we put into the plat approvals by the
city that anything that is a result or outcome of the North Meridian Planning Area
group would then be incorpofated into the development agreement and so that
was great for quite a while. Now, I think what we have is we have a situation
where some of these 1,200 lot subdivisions afe 50, 60, 75 percent built out. So,
now where we are is that's actually worked out pretty well for a lot of that
development community because it was kind of a feel good thing, but it didn't
cost them anything mOfe out of pocket. So, I agree that now we are in a situation
where we have to put our thoughts back together one more time and say is there
something that we can offer in the self interest in the economic intefest of a
developer to give them an incentive to do x, y and z. If we could even acquire
the fight of way for those future build out intersections that would be a huge help.
Eastlake: Yeah, we might be able to build them faster.
Wynkoop: Much less getting some help towards the possible future construction,
but even acquiring the fight of way would be a tremendous help. Now where we
are is with a lot of these being fairly well built out, I would expect that the
developers understand full well that that's probably an unenforceable condition. I
think it's worth one more try to go back to them and say okay what are you guys
really willing to do? Are you willing to help us out on it? You understand the
problem. We have never come up with a specific solution, but is there something
out there? I think if staff could give some thought, is there something we could
offer as an incentive? I think that's great. Staff has given this a great deal of
thought and they are probably going, oh man, one more meeting. But, I think it's
worth one more shot at it and if we don't get anything out of this ever, I think we
just say well it was worth a try and the real solution at least for us does become
impact fees in getting projects adequately into the impact fee capital
improvement plan. Now, I think there has been some tremendous things come
out of the North Meridian fOf land use planning site, so I think it has been a real
win in that situation. I am just skeptical about whether it's really ended up being
a help on the transportation side, but I agree with the Mayor if you don't ask, you
don't receive, therefore, it's worth one more try.
Rountree: To that point, Dave, I have been on the feceiving end of that kind of
direction from the board of staff and (inaudible) staff is sitting right now saying,
well that's great, but are willing to commit that if the developers say okay, we will
give you the right of way, are you then going to install the signals? That's the
other half of the equation. It's got to work both ways.
Hubert: If they do that, I think as a commission, we have to have a serious
conversation because everybody here knows other commissions and my feelings
and if we get right of way (inaudible), we have to fund intersections at a higher
percentage of our budget to work out.
Wynkoop: At least within a projected build out period of time.
Meridian City Council & A D Commission Meeting
November 16,2004
Page 11 of 19
Rountree: You have to make a commitment, we have to commit.
Bird: But, you know the nice thing out on the Meridian plan, I was just sitting
here thinking that most of the corners are not platted out yet. I mean they might
be platted, but they are not worked on. The only one I can think of is Bridgetower
across the street. They got that. So, if we are going to do it, we can't wait until
next year. We have got to jump in and get it done now before that gets platted
and all the plans get it gone and get that ground. I am like Charlie, if we commit
to the staff, we better commit to it. You know, we can't have them running
around doing this and us sitting back here hem hawing around.
De Weerd: Well, I am like all of you. Let's do something and staff when you
have the meeting, if I could be invited, I will attend so I can better relay the
conversation to the development community and being able to go through the
thought process and it would be helpful. So, I will commit to meeting whenever
you guys-
Franden: Tammy, who is going to take the lead? Could Anna take the lead of
setting up the meeting or - we just say somebody do it, it may not get done.
De Weerd: Okay. Anna, would you please take the lead on this?
Canning: I can. I would like for ACHD staff if they could maybe meet to
brainstorm on some of the ideas before we all get together, I think that would be
helpful.
De Weerd: Okay.
(Inaudible discussion).
De Weerd: And if we could plan in getting together after Thanksgiving, that
following week, would that work? Sherry?
Hubert: Because if you can identify what you were asking earlier (inaudible) are
the top ten for Meridian and if you can approach those developers and we can
look at our schedule and say well they are not even in the CIP, so that means
they really get (inaudible). Give a rough estimate of the dollars if they donated
the land to build out because it's what we were talking about is if we can
demonstrate to them that we have that commitment, the value increase in that
land as corner parcels, is dramatic for them. So, that would be a huge incentive
if we can put it all together for them to donate. It would really be truly a win, win
because we would get the intersection, hopefully sooner and they would get a
value added piece of property that they wouldn't get for 10 or 15 years. I mean, if
you can - I think you almost have to prioritize as best you can the intersections,
Meridian City Council & i JD CommissIon Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 12 of 19
really kind of look at a rough cost analysis so we know, the commissioners know
the dollars that would have to be committed.
De Weerd: Now is there a mechanism that if we went ahead - if we got some of
it donated that they have even a late comer's option if a group of developers
decided hey we will just go ahead and help with this that - or future impact fees
could help pay it back or -
Franden: If they are on arterials. If the intersections are arterials, then we can
use impact fees.
Bivens: And in the CIP.
Hubert: And in the CIP and see that's the catch.
Rountree: Not and/or?
Hubert: Both. Has to be both.
Bivens: A good example of that is Eagle Road and Overland. The work that's
being done there is paid by the developer and will be repaid out of impact fees in
the future.
(Inaudible discussion).
De Weerd: Does staff have enough information to move forward on? Okay,
thank you. We will go ahead, if there is anything - we will go ahead and move
onto storm water drainage. And I do want to thank Gary for the email. That was
very helpful. We appreciate that.
Item 4.
Discussion of Storm Water Retention Ponds - Maintenance
and Landscape Issues:
De Weerd: Who wants to take the lead on this?
Canning: Madame Mayor, members of the Council and Commissioners the staff
also talked about storm water drainage and I am just going to give you an update
on kind of where staff went and then when I presented that to Council the
questions they had and I believe that Mr. Brown has a response to the questions
that Council had. I will start off with this staff's meetings and we came up with
kind of two basic things. One was that we needed some sort of understanding
and I put MOU up there. I don't know if that's technically the right document, but
just some understanding as to what plan design requirements would be and
those were that we would ask for the full street width buffer and the one tree per
35 feet which is standard for that. Then some sort of low maintenance ground
cover and internally it would have to be vegetated. I think that your staff has
Meridian City Council & lID Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 1 3 of 19
been really proposed (inaudible) which sometimes they are a weed problem but
we understand that it does need to be low maintenance and I think we can
accommodate that. One tree per 8,000 square feet within the interior area and
those can be clustered; you don't have to place them all scattered throughout.
And to also meet our storm water drainage pond standards, which is slopes less
than (inaudible) and there are some other standards in there about the use of
rock and things like that. Now, if it were able to be designed that way and we
understand that some of them are not, but if it were able to be designed that way
then we wouldn't require what we call a land use buffer, but we would just treat it
like open space and it wouldn't have a land use buffer. Now if it's unable to meet
the (inaudible) then what we have (inaudible ----------) is that it's more like an
industrial use and therefore, the landscape buffer or the land use buffer is
required and then we would ask that you meet the landscaping requirements for
a land use buffers. Then once we have it planned and then agreement on the
plans then we could go forward with an agreement on the maintenance and the
City would agree on low maintenance plan and the Parks Department would
maintain that with the support of City Council at budget time. The Parks Director
wanted to make that clear. We presented this to Council. I think Council
member Rountree had a question about what the agreements were for other
draining basins within Ada County and who agreed to maintain those and the
general assessment of (inaudible) and I think that's what Mr. Brown has. There
was the general comment that - well, I will let Council member Rountree raise
that one if he wants to.
Rountree: I was kind of grumpy that night.
Hubert: Yeah, before Mr. Brown starts I just kind of want to throw one thing out
for the next. I don't know exactly where we are on this with the vegetation and
the trees, but I would like to offer a historical prospective of an unnamed city who
really wanted landscaping and boy did (inaudible----------------). Then the next
thing, I go driving down there and the trees are dying and the bushes are dying.
So we spent a lot of money and then they found out that they didn't have in their
budget to maintain it. So, in any - if we get to a point of an agreement, it seems
fair that if we agree to put in trees or whatever and they die from lack of
maintenance then it seems to me we should be reimbursed that money. Really,
this is just based on - and it's a city I love dearly, but we spent a lot of money
and they died because they didn't maintain them.
Franden: I am little confused. Are we talking about collectors, arterials or local
roads?
Canning: Well, I think most of your basins are -
(Inaudible discussion)
Meridian City Council & j ID Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 14 of 19
Brown: Madame Mayor, Council and Commissioners. I am Kent Brown and
manager of engineering. The Highway District and in response to some
questions that were asked I did prepare this memo and I brought some extra
copies. How many people brought their memo? A couple things about, first of all
- which ones are they addressing? They are addressing in accordance with
Meridian's ordinance with regard to this, those so-called gateway kind of streets
and so far and this addresses the issue about what we are going to do. We
already have two ponds that fall under this category and one of them as we
speak has been landscaped and that's the one on Franklin and Locust Grove
and we just last week completed the landscaping of that. That includes
(inaudible), the irrigation system and the trees and the dry land grass has been
seeded in it. The one that has not, but is under design and that's one of the
things for Anna's information my understanding is that we are going to have to
look at (inaudible) on the one that's on Overland and Meridian. Some of these -
the width of the buffer, there may,wind up having to be some kind of a variance
to meet all of this, (inaudible) the reason for that is because that pond is already
been dug. In other words, where it is located relative to the where the street is,
it's already been decided and that much can't be changed and so that is a
comment. So, that is where we are right now; we are right now talking about a
pond that's already been landscaped and which the contractor for that portion of
the contract would be turning that over to us within, well within the next three or
four weeks, okay? But, obviously we are in that time of the year where it won't
require right now, but come next spring it will require some maintenance and so,
that's where we are time-wise. Now, let's talk about the issue of payment and
how-
De Weerd: Before you go on - did you have something that you wanted to add?
Speaker?: Now, I have got some comments that I would like to make, but-
Brown: Regarding the cost and that's what this was to address and I went
through and we prepared a list of those places and (inaudible) and other entities
within Ada County where at their request we did extra landscaping and
landscaping on a normal drainage ponds is dry land grasses and that is what we
do. As you can see in every instance where we went along in a project in which
we went to greater extent on landscaping, we had an agreement either with the
city or in a couple of instances property owners who were represented by the
homeowners and the most prominent one is up on 15th Street, but in every one of
those instances we had an agreement as you can see where they were
responsible for the maintenance and taking care of the landscaping, I must
emphasize the Highway District (inaudible) keeps the responsibility for mucking
out the pond. At some point when you have a pond, it's going to have a lot of
sediment get into it; the cities or those entities are not expected to do that. The
(inaudible) takes care of that with maintenance crews, but the cities or the entity
that has agreed to take care of the landscaping has with one exception, we have
paid for installation of the irrigation system, the installation of the trees or shrubs
Meridian City Council & lD Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 15 of 19
or whatever that you have in the landscaping like that and then the entity has
paid for the water, the maintenance of the irrigation and the maintenance of the
trees. There have been a couple of different instances that are noted in there.
One of them is in the case of Eagle. The project in Eagle and that particular case
they actually stepped up and paid for a portion of the landscaping and a portion
of the bill for putting in the irrigation system. So, they went a little bit beyond
what Boise has done and in the other instance was Star and there was a desire
on Star's part to have at least one of the two ponds out there irrigated and to
have them landscape, but they decided they didn't have the money and so what
we did at that time, we did stub water out to them, but at this time there hasn't
been any other landscaping put into those ponds and the presumption is that
someday when they do that they will probably ---
(Tape turned over)
Brown: -- the landscaping that we have taken part of. The actual landscaping up
there operates as a buffer and it's along the sides of Federal Way, but the pond
site itself was not landscaped. All five ponds that are on there, they - and there
is not anything - that differs a little bit from what's been proposed here in
Meridian. You will see there is a setup - what was it every 8,000 feet that you
want to have some interior trees so that the trees are not just along the edge of
the road like they are on Federal Way. So, that's what I was prepared to do and
beyond that answer your questions.
De Weerd: Mr. Wynkoop.
Wynkoop: Madame Mayor. I would like to give Wynkoop speech 263 and the
other Commissioners are going not 263 again, but I am going to say it one last
time, so (inaudible-----------). Drainage is a huge problem and it needs a solution
desperately. We have tried and tried to find some solutions to it. It's eating our
(inaudible) at ACHD. The community needs a drainage district countywide. We
are going to be trying to renew that effort. We'd had it in the past. In the
meantime, it's become increasingly a high percentage of our budget and so we
not only take the street drainage, but we end up solving, since it's impossible and
a lot of times differentiates street drainage from off-street drainage, we end up
being the defacto drainage district in this valley. It's taking 10, 15 sometimes 20
percent of our capital budget and so what that means is there is a lot less money
to build roads. I believe drainage is a community problem, not an ACHD problem
and I believe it's only ACHD getting stuck with drainage because in order to get
the road built by nature of the beast we have to do something with the drainage
so we end up getting stuck. But, I want everybody to understand the opportunity
cost issue. Now, I am talking the big picture of drainage. Let's talk about
landscaping for just a minute. ACHD's past policy and practice has been with
some exceptions that we build the pond, if somebody wants to landscape it and
maintain it, and then we will give them permission to do that. We have been
pretty consistent on that with drainage ponds and subdivisions as well as our
Meridian City Council & l. ID Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 16 of 19
own drainage (inaudible) ponds for the road. But in the past we have been
extremely reluctant to get into the landscaping whatsoever. Again, it's because
we think it's not within our core mission to handle drainage and to go the step
further and do the drainage. Okay, but that's history. Maybe with (inaudible)
Commission and recognition of the practical reality is is we are just going to
handle drainage and therefore, landscaping needs to be part of that solution.
The reason I am bringing all up to you at this point is to say that what we do for
Meridian, we will have to do for all the cities. So, if we are going to adopt this as
a policy for Meridian, I assure you that Boise will want more, then Eagle will want
more or at least as much. We at ACHD I think have a core mission of
(inaudible). We have a whole lot of what I call distracting missions that take
away from our core mission and drainage is one of those distracting missions.
Landscaping is one of those distracting missions. Those are absolutely
essential, absolutely important, but in terms of our core mission they are
distracting functions. So, I guess I just urge you to think carefully that the more
that you request of us in these distracting missions, that means that the less
dollars will be available for our core mission. I submit to you of the Ada County
cities, it is the City of Meridian that most desperately needs us to continue to fulfill
our core mission. Speech No. 263 over, probably for the last time.
Eastlake: I will use that distracting. I like that.
Wynkoop: Tammy, that's just from our point of view.
Bivens: We spend at minimum about 8.5 million dollars a year on drainage. In
one way or the other. That's - we quit adding when we got to that number.
Bird: Madame Mayor.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I think the main thing and Ken has pointed it out is we wanted to know what
the other cities were doing. He came back with a very good answer as far as I
am concerned. We didn't expect special favors, but on the same token if he
were to maintain it for somebody else, we expect you to maintain it for us.
Eastlake: We try and be consistent about those kinds of treatments because we
get into too much trouble if-
Bivens: We maintain the pond. That's important. We understand, as far as
taken care of it and mucking it out and what we call major maintenance.
De Weerd: I guess I will give you my speech because - we have requirements
of everyone as you do when we develop a park or develop anything, we pay
impact fees just like everyone else and that's kind of what we told our staff on our
landscape ordinance is that we have this in place because it is our community
Meridian City Council & / .0 Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 1 7 of 19
and it does mean something to us. We have the same scenario as on these
costs and what (inaudible), what pulls at us all over the place and maintenance
and everything else, so we know that song and we sing it in our sewer treatment
plant and our water wells and every other place. It's kind of one of those things
that all of our taxing entities have. But, we are talking key, visible areas of our
community. These are not our parks. These are your drainage areas. If they
were not in real highly visible parts, we could probably say we really don't care as
long as you maintain them or with your grasses or whatever and we have had
conversations about even some of those facilities that look really, really bad. So,
that's the history part of it, but we have some in very key areas of our community.
Franklin and Locust Grove is kind of an entry corridor. Along Franklin when the
overpass goes in, it's certainly a key and boy that other unsightly mess on
Meridian and Overland is an embarrassment. There is absolutely nothing there,
but a fence with slats in it and that is our entry corridor, so we were told at that
time that it would be taken care of and taken care of very nicely and I know you
are not (inaudible--------) business, it's apparent because that corner is horrible.
It's not even weeded. I think that if you come to the city and ask for
maintenance, give us something that we even want to maintain or put it
somewhere that's hidden, not on the front entry to our community. You show
examples where you landscaped and others have maintained it and that's what
we asked for. We wanted to see what others were doing because we didn't have
that in front of us and now Council can see what others are doing and they can
decide what they want to do. But, asking us to landscape it and maintain it and I
am glad you do muck it out because I know sometimes I get to do a lot of things
that aren't in my job description, that wasn't one of them I wanted to do. But, you
know I do appreciate this piece of information, but these drainage areas are on
key corners of our community and again, we want to be partners with you, but we
also want you to take care of your facilities as well. Councilman Wardle.
Wardle: Just to follow up on our discussion as a group. One of the two
comments that came out. One was a set of standards and the City of Meridian
has a set of standards and ACHD has a set of standards and we require all those
that come before us to develop new projects to achieve those standards and it
seemed to us that putting in a new roadway, ACHD was overlooking the
standards in the City of Meridian and even those requirements when we have
private developers that come in to build subdivisions and business parks, we
require both agencies and require them to meet our standards and so that was
one of the discussion items. The second was essentially an equitable situation in
the sense that ACHD is coming to Meridian and asking for maintenance, which
also includes a budgetary dollar figure as Anna has passed through for our parks
director. At the same time, when we develop projects and we are developing a
project right now which is coming before us a 30 acre park out on Ten Mile and
will be required to pay those impact fees and so that was really the tax payer
question that we were asking.
De Weerd: Mr. Franden.
Meridian City Council & m Commission Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 18 of 19
Franden: You know Tammy I agree with you. One of the pet peeves I have had
about our area ever since I was a little kid was along our roadways we treated
them very poorly. We let weeds grow. We let it look trashy. You can have a
beautiful highway or beautiful road going and just off of it you don't have any
landscaping at all and it doesn't look good. If I had the money and the ability I
would do a lot of landscaping and we have to figure out how to maintain it, but
what goes through my mind is because - you know I don't have any pictures, I
need a picture of what you are talking about of specific corners and so on. I
would say let's take each one of the problem areas and jointly take a look at
those and see how we could solve it so that indeed it does look nice.
Brown: I think I can address that. I think we are spending some time discussing
or debating something (inaudible) resolved and that's about what is going to be
installed, but since (inaudible) Franklin and Locust Grove went through your
design process and your folks improved that. It was done in accordance, okay?
So what has been put in there, Overland and Meridian is being designed right
now and we let you know at least I think we did that we were waiting on that
because we would have another project that is going to resolve in widening that
out and that's that intersection over there. We said that what we wanted to do
was wait on that until we added in the extra piece and then we would design that
up as part of that, but in response to the Mayor who talked to Bruce about the
fact a while back and said that you didn't like that over there, just like what you
just pointed out. We already have that under design and so we are planning to
do that work next spring and it's already been over with your people and they
already had taken a look at that preliminary design, that's what J mentioned prior
because of where that pond is is going require a little bit of a variance with regard
to the distance, but the actual stuff that is being designed is being reviewed by
your folks. So, you are having an opportunity to decide what we are going to put
in there. The only issue that the Highway District still has on it's plate is the one
about who is going to maintain the landscaping that's planned to go in there.
De Weerd: Well, Kent I think you gave us some good information that the
Council did ask and then Gary, apparently, was very good at communicating it to
you and this was very helpful and I am sorry - my 101 is just not as finely
polished as Mr. Wynkoops.
Brown: We have a plan on that. It is ugly over there.
Eastlake: I think it looks better than it used to. Where have you guys all been for
the last (inaudible) - that's the pathway in.
Brown: (Inaudibe----------).
De Weerd: Well, Kent we will let your (inaudible--------) or I will give Jay a call
once Council has a moment to (inaudible-------------).
Meridian City Council & j .D Commission Meeting
November 16,2004
Page 19 of 19
(I na ud i ble discussion ------------------------)
De Weerd: Now Commission, we do have a presentation by Hudson, Tom
Hudson about the downtown traffic management plan. Hopefully you can all stay
and listen to it. It is a 20-minute presentation at the conclusion of this and they
have a 7:00 meeting that they have to start, so we really need to cut this off.
Commissioner?
Speaker?: One thing about doing this and I think it shouldn't be lost is it's our
problem. It's a community problem. It's not just an ACHD problem. It's a
community problem that hasn't found a solution. So, I think that's message one.
It's not just a developer going in and developing a project. ACHD is
accommodating the drainage because there is no one else that is doing it and we
need to do it and (inaudible) project done as you requested, I think my only
probably final point is that more required on ACHD the higher the cost county-
wide the less funds available to do the road projects you so desperately need so
I just ask that that point not be lost in this discussion. It's always possible, for
example, for the internal, but the homeowner's association to maintain it. If we
don't do a level of installation and maintenance that the city is comfortable with, it
is always possible for the city to say we prefer a higher standard and we will
accept the responsibility for the higher standard.
De Weerd: I should have asked for the Reader's Digest version. I did fail to
introduce our new Council member, Christine Donnell. I know you all know her,
but now you know her as Council Donnell. Motion to adjourn?
Bird: So moved.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: All those in favor. All ayes.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:35 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
ATTESTED'
WILLIAM G. BERG,
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL I ACHD COMMISSION
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING I WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 5:30 p.m.
Meridian City Hall
CHyCouncilChambe~
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle )( Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree )C Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
-X- David Wynkoop Susan Eastlake
~ Sherry Huber X David Bivens
x: President John Franden
/
x
~
2. Adoption of the Agenda: afJ fJrove..
3. Discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan: cft7G4f..T .r..etA..
4. Discussion of Storm Water Retention Ponds - Maintenance and
Landscape Issues: vl.-/r GV(.J .red..-
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - November 16,2004
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Page 1 of 1
~p /CITYOF _' "C
'-../VI erldiciti~-~l:; _c,,'\
IDAHO y'
< j
"Ci," ?
1~'11 lit, THr-:.\Sl'Hf. V;'J._l-~Y';
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP I MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Keith Bird
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
&
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234/ fax 895-0390
Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will
hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Meridian City Hall, City Council
Parks & Recreation
11 E. Bower Street
888-3579/ fax 898-5501
Chambers, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday,
Planning & Zoning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533/ fax 888-6854
November 16, 2004 at 5:30 pm. They will be discussing planning
and service issues and items concerning both agencies such as:
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
388-6678/ fax 846-7366
- discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan,
..., discussion of storm water retention ponds - maintenance and
landscaping issues.
Public Works
560 E. Watertower Lane
,uite 200
)98.55001 fax 898.9551
The public is welcome to attend.
Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 1 fax 887-1297
DATED this 12th day of November, 2004
Sewer (WWTP)
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-21911 fax 884.0744
Water
2235 N. W. 8th Street
888-5242/ fax 884-1159
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - November 16, 2004
All materials presented at public meetings shall becom@ the property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK-FAX 888.4218 HU~[/\i'\ RESOURCES-FAX 884.8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BilLING-FAX 887-4813 ~IAYOR'S OFFICE-F,\X 884.8119
~ .'
"AcH~ "
~
Name
3775 Adams Street. Garden City ID 83714
387.6100 - Phone
Tille
387.6391 . Electronic FAX
345.7650 - Hard-copy FAX
e.mail: tellvs@achd.ada.id.us
Web Site: www.achd.ada.id.us
Ext Cell Phone
Ext Cell Phone Name
Title
Traffic pepart~en~ ~.~~" ~'":~ j~~~!~:1?$~~;r:ll~::~{~~~2I~.~;::8~~~:?SJ"6140 ~~
~'" ~ ". ~~"v ,,~ ~" cv ~ ?/c 'f.~~ 'd--F;;W:~'1""":<""".;Y("",$v&;r.:':i~~~"'"~=
CommissIoners. " ,; ..' < /.~,X~k':,;i:.-:0'%'J;1'i'1t'kfft~ ~l:i!'~;i(;o;;.g;i381.6100
,~"'" 'A-,,,~.,/o'/-.,,,"&x.~rn~'sb"Y=-... &~~.^~","='c<<","'" ~ ?"
Commissioners .
John S. Franden
David E. Wynkoop
Susan S. Easllake
Sherry R. Huber
David Bivens
President
1 st Vice President
2nd Vice President
Commissioner
Commissioner
110
110
110
110
110
Conference,Roomsr ~ "~" ~ ". ~;~~~~i~,,~i:1~::;,~'?J;;i:1l~jl;B:rU:;~~;> /. ^' ? -
Retreat
Garden City Room
Kuna Room
315 E 38th St.
Engineering
PPC
267
224
157
Adminfstratio'n . , ' ,. .~.f .;t,;~::.;'; ~;;;:;;7l1:f"+i7':':' :'; 387-6100
Administration
J Schweitzer
Susan Slaughter
Public Rel3tions.
Craig Quintana
Christy Foltz-Ahlrichs
BusfnessRelatlons
Larry Sale
Director
Senior Administrative Assistant
Public Relations Officer
Public Relations Specialist
Business Relations Manager
110
110
107
108
legal ' '~~f. ,;~?' ~;~~L~~~~3~~?~~~t:};,~4~;:<~t~"f3B4..6113" .
118
Lega'..... .
Steven Price
Alicia Breen
Kathy Takasugi
"'387-6113
General Counsel
Paralegal
Staff Attorney
112
113
114
Planning/Programming/Cost EStim,!tjriW:i;~';:;'r;[~lf:~~ft:i;'~:", ';~ :.387.6119
PI~hrilng/f'rogr~rilrriinglC<:l~t Estifuating." .
Kaley Levihn P.E. PPC Manager
Barbara Kerbs Administrative Assistant
Don Kostelec Transportation Program Planner
Kendall Kemmer P.E. Cost Estimator
Sally Goodell Three Cities Project Coordinator
Wayne Forrey Funding Facilitator
109
119
234
130
129
156
Admin[stratio~ Deparlfuent ( c',;:;. ,:", "'.\:'~~,:i,:,: "~;~;).!U;,1i12.0 ,.~..
Accounting' '
Michael L. Brokaw
Nina Barton
Pat Heckmann
Peggy Smith
Ken Cooney
Jenn Humphries
Angie Merrill
Daria Young
Sue Fisher
Christine Boyles
InfonTlatloll Technology
Steve Gifford
Vic Dumatol
Eleanor Vonberg
Chuck Spencer
Sharon Anderson
Diane Rausch
Human Resources
Shari Knauss
Keme Borgholthaus
26-J ul-04
ManagerfTreasurer
Assistant Manager
Budget Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Data/Cost Accounting/Payroll
Administrative Clerk
Payables
Receivables
Receptionist
Administrative Clerk
Supervisor
Personal Computer Specialist
Database Programmer
GIS Coordinator
GIS Analyst
GIS Analyst
Personnel Coordinator
Personnel Tech
122
123
127
125
128
121
124
126
101
102
115
116
131
241
242
244
105
106
Traffic Admin
Terry Little P.E.
Joe Rosenlund P.E.
Pat Birkinbine
Jessica Pawling
Traffic Engineering
Shawn Martin P.E.
Ross Oyen P.E.
Craig Herndon EIT
John Wasson
Bryan Huey
Tom Satorie
Sue Alex
Jacque Shrader
Norman Sullivan
John Terrell
Traffic Operations
3700 Adams
Bemie Valentine
Jen O'Bannan
Gary Dalton
Chris Smith
Rock Ware
Tony Kinch
Mike Young
Dennis Frank
Ron Sperl
Mike Fowler
Mike Welsh
ON-CALL NUMBER
Center Bay
Back Bay
Wood ShOp
Lunch Room
(;ong'eStion ManagemElnt '387-6195
Jim Larsen Traffic Operations Engineer 196
Mike Boydstun Assistant Traffic Ops Engineer 197
Wendi Tillman TMC Specialist 198
Colliniuteride ...'i ...... ........ ....i......',', 345;7665 or 387 ~6160.'.
S714Fairview' '.' 'iFPJ(3j"S-2582.....
Catherine Sanchez: Commuteride Coordinator
Cecelia Hockett Commuteride Service Rep
Michele Villnave Employer Assistance Rep
Tom Fassino Employer Assistance Rep
Administrative Clerk
Administrative Clerk
Administrative Clerk
Vanpool Technician
Manager
Assistant Manager
Administrative Assistant
Student Helper
Traffic Engineering Supervisor
Traffic Design Engineer
Assistant Traffic Engineer
Assistant Traffic Engineer
Designer
Traffic Analyst
Traffic Analyst
Traffic Tech
Traffic Tech
Traffic Tech
..... .. .. 387-6190
FAX 387-6219
Superintendent
Clerk/Dispatcher
Electronic Specialist
Electronic Specialist
Signal Inspector
Signal Shop Crew Chief
Signal Construction Crew Chief
Sign Crew Chief
Sign Crew
Paint Crew Chief
Paint Crew
Ben Goodrich
Dave Miller
142
145
141
143
154
146
144
151
147
150
149
148
152
152
192
191
194
193
200
199
201
203
204
212
213
207
208
209
206
162
164
165
167
166
163
161
168
Right':Qf.Way &'Oiivei.opmept ~ervi~es' . : ':. <'z;> <387:6110 .., i
Ri~ht-9f~l/\Iay~ D~veloprrient'A.~nii~ii.~~I~~t70."""
FAX 387-6393 .
Bruce Mills P,E. Manager 185
Gary Inselman Assistant Manager 180
Nan Hills Administrative Assistant 173
Karen Anderson Account Clerk 271
Page 1
"-::If - .. ~
'~Ac:..H~ "
;::r
Title
Administrative Clerk
387-6170
. .
FAX 387-6393
Supervisor
Principal Development Analyst
Development Analyst
Senior Development Analyst
Development Engineer
Student Helper
387.6170
FAX 387-6393
Supervisor
Principal Development Analyst
Development Analyst
Senior Development Analyst
387-6270
FAx 387-6380
Supervisor
Senior ROW Agent
Senior ROW Agent
Senior ROW Agent
Consultant Property Management
Name
Debbie Brown
Development Review
Darrin Carroll
Shelly Reynolds
Scott Rudel
Dennis Cline
Douglas Cox P.E.
Linda Peters
Planning Review
Christy Richardson
Andrea Tuning
Joyce Newton
Lori Den Hartog
Right-of-Way.
Randy lane
Scott Johnson
Kathy Smith SRfWA
Jennifer Likes
3775 Adams Street - Garden City ID 83714
387-6100 . Phone
Ext Cell Phone
172
183
176
181
184
273
186
178
177
171
174
272
276
274
275
277
Engineering Department - ::'i"'; .:;:~. .~]~;;;;~0:~;/~;~i:;:;jh';.~<.3a1-6220
EngineenngAdniih ...
L. Kent Brown P.E.
Dorrell R. Hansen P.E.
Misty Perry
Utilities
Chuck Rinaldi
Jason Madenford
Michael Huffaker
Desig"'.........
Manager
Assistant Manager
Administrative Assistant
Steve Spickelmier
Tracey Flores
Dale Kuperus P.E.
Beverly Hopkins
Jeremy Andree
Ramon Wells
SurVey
Steve Padoris
Aaron Bell
John Fisher
Ryan Strain
Richard Allen
Drainage
Art Jenkins P.E.
Kathy Allen
Drainage Quantity. .
Kyle Carpenter
Alex Hammond
Storm water Cll.i8lity
Erica Anderson Maguire
222
223
221
Utility Coordinator 258
Utility Specialist 259
Student Helper 265
'> .... 387,6225 Field ph: 860-6628
. FAX 387-6159
Supervisor
Secretary
Design Engineer
Design Agreement Administrator
Senior Designer
Designer
Designer
227
225
229
235
231
232
233
Monica Lowe
26-Jul-04
Survey Coordinator
Survey Party Chief
Instrument Operator
Survey Technician
Student Helper
387-6250
Supervisor
Secretary
Assistant Civil Engineer
Student Helper
Stormwater Quality Coordinator
Stormwater Quality Specialist I
Stormwater Quality Specialist I
245
246
246
246
246
252
251
256
269
254
261
255
Name
Olivia Cunningham
Rachel Lawrence
Mike Russell
Heather Johns
Construction
Richard Ross
Regina Cunningham
Gail Struhs
Zone Inspectors ·
Larry Zurek
Patti Greene
Chance Herron
Jim Pickard
Steve Walker
Jon Thompson
Marco Piva
Ed Merrill
Ryan Fisher
387.6391 - Electronic FAX
345-7650 - Hard-copy FAX
e-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us
Web Site: www.achd.ada.id.us
Ext Cell Phone
268
260
266
263
264
Tille
Student Helper
Storm water Quality Specialist I
Student Helper
Stormwater Quality Specialist Jl
Stormwater Quality Specialist I
387-6280
FAX 387-6289'
Supervisor
Secretary
Permit Inspection Coordinator
Clerk/Dispatcher
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
Zone Inspector
283
282
290
291
286
292
293
294
295
296
297
279
300
284
306
298
305
285
287
308
281
301
302
303
304
297
307
288
John Edney
Belinda Mcllhargey
Projecllnspectors
Steve Sprague Construction Coordinator
Justin Bledsoe Contract Administrator
Jon Harrop Student Helper
Dave Longenecker Resident Project Rep
Marvin Buster Resident Project Rep
Scott Wasson Resident Project Rep
AI Busche Resident Project Rep
Bill Thompson Resident Project Rep
Scott Chambers Resident Project Rep
Jeff Bowman Resident Project Rep
Subdivisloh/Sridge Inspectors
Jerry Hopkins Subdivision/Bridge Coordinator
Sandy McGregor Administrative Clerk
Dennis Meredith Sr Subdivision/Bridge Inspector
Subdivision/Bridge Inspector
Subdivision/Bridge Inspector
Subdivision/Bridge Inspector
Subdivision/Bridge Inspector
Bill Hill
Dennis Alloway
Lawrence Korgan
Jake Spencer
Lab Coordinator
Senior Engineering Tech
Senior Engineering Tech
Engineering Technician
310
311
312
313
M&OAdmin .
Errol Morgan
r!laintenance & Operations' .) " ': ',. "';.::~-' ~.","-:
Jeannette O'Dell
M&O Urban, Adanis
. . '- -. ,.... .
3730 Adams
Randy Noble
Karen Arnold
Pavement Management.
George Alton
Mike Cleveland
'. ,......,....387-6320...
. . . . ,. ,'c' ,. -'. _ -..
Manager
Assistant Manager
Administrative Assistant
.'. .........',.........387-6325
. . FAX 387-6328
Superintendent
Clerk/Dispatcher
322
323
321
Sr Pavement Management Tech
Pavement Management Tech
327
326
330
331
Page 2
'J~ i~~
'~'A..s:lfU. ~
~ ~~
Name T~~
M&O Urban, Adams - Crews
Chuck Lakey Utility/Concrete Crew Chief
Frank Kerbs Utility Crew Leadworker
Nolan Hansen Utility Crew Leadworker
Jim Michaelson Grade Crew Chief
Clint Heckenlively Grade Crew Leadworker
Steve Elam Grade Crew Leadworker
Kevin Barton Broom Crew Chief
Marsh Anderson Broom Crew Leadworker
Rick Davidsmeier Broom Crew Leadworker
ON-CALL NUMBER
M&O Urban, Adams - Shop Building 387.6340
Ron Archuleta Shop Foreman
Mike Gossi Shop Leadworker
Arvin Cunningham Weld Shop
Mike Adams Yardman
Shop Bay Phone
M&O Urban, Adams - Building
Shop Area
Training Room
M&ORural,GJoverdale 387..fi350
440 N Cloverdale FAX 387c6374
Duane Hays Superintendent
Susan Kyle Clerk/Dispatcher
M&O Ruraf,CJoverdale c Crews
Jeff Brockett Drainage Crew Chief
Rich Shaw Drainage Crew
Steve Adams Patch Crew Chief
Jon Mills Patch Crew
Gilbert Tuning Utility Crew Chief
Don Shaw Drains & Utilities
Scott Frisbie Drains & Utiflties
Doug Brodhecker Lead Arborist
Joe Stutzman Grade Crew Chief
Bill Kennedy Grade Crew
Dave Cruthirds SILO Crew
Scott Hiner SILO Crew
Tony Vanvalkenburg SILO Crew
M&O. Rurar,Gloverdale- Equipment Ser
Jeff Storkan Equipment Services
M&ORural, CJoverdale - Tire Shop
Jerry Trowbridge Tireman
M&O Rural, Cloverdale - Building
Tony Wallace Carpenter's Shop
Lunch Room
26-J ul-04
3775 Adams Street - Garden City 10 83714
387-6100 - Phone
EXl Celf Phone
Name
332
332
332
336
336
336
337
337
337
341
341
344
346
342
340
339
352
351
357
357
355
355
356
358
353
360
359
365
363
Title
387-6391 - Electronic FAX
345-7650 - Hard-copy FAX
a-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us
Web Site: www.achd.ada.id.us
Ext Cell Phone
Page 3
November 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
3
REQUEST Discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meeHngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
ri:1l:S'" .l V.l .l
Will Berg
From: Kristy Vigil [vigilk@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 4:54 PM
To: 'Tara Green'; Will Berg; hallm@meridiancity.org; 'Jessica Johnson'
Subject: slides from Tuesday
From Anna
Kristy Vigil
Assistant City Planner
Meridian Planning & Zoning
208-884-5533
11/15/2004
North Meridian Area Plan
... ACHD Capital Improvement Plan
· Will begin update in about one year.
. Update to reflect better demographics.
. Intersections receive higher priority.
"..,push off need for additional lanes for many
L' , ~iJ year?
r-\ ~i' i. Sidewalks in easements not ROW.
W~{- ;-;~
'.. ~,gevelopment Review
i 'iJ~~Intersection analysis and ranking.
'.$'",,1 Warrant regarding signalization.
Stormwater Drainage
... MOU for Plan Design
. Street buffer:
~Full width
~ One tree per 35 feet
..,. "...~Low maintenance ground cover
{, . t.r rrite~nal:
.... . iih. '~Veig.etated-dry land grasses
.... .'n9~e tree per B,OOO square feet
l%;:~ Stormwater drainage pond standards.
S '%j :'~5Iopes less than 3: 1
. ..,';' If above, then no land use buffer required.
Stormwater Drainage
... MOU for Maintenance
. City to agree on low maintenance plan
· Parks Department to maintain
1
1
I
-'1'
cU'e;;dl~~=> ; '\
ID,\HO ,1Y
/
MAYOR
Tamm y de Weerd
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP I MEETING
CrTY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L M. Nary
Keith Bird
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
&
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234/ fax 895-0390
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will
hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Meridian City Hall, City Council
Parks & Recreation
11 E. Bower Street
888-3579/ fax 898-5501
Chambers, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday,
Planning & Zoning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533/ fax 888-6854
November 16, 2004 at 5:30 pm. They will be discussing planning
and service issues and items concerning both agencies such as:
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678/ fax 846-7366
- discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan,
- discussion of storm water retention ponds - maintenance and
landscaping issues.
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500/ fax 898-9551
The public is welcome to attend.
- Building
660 E. Water tower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211/fax 887-1297
DATED this 12th day of November, 2004
- Sewer (WWTP)
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 /fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N. W. 8th Street
888-5242/ fax 884-1159
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - November 16, 2004
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the properly of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 88~4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLEHK- E\X 888.4218 till,\I.\!\' I~ESOUHCES -E\X 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING -E.\X 887-48] 3 ~li\YOH'S OFFICE- J'i\X R84.8] 19
VVn~ ~()St ~{ fubL'c- /' )dKLt., -llnt1Ylk:~ ~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL I ACHD COMMISSION
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING I WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
Meridian City Hall
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
David Wynkoop Susan Eastlake
Sherry Huber David Bivens
President John Franden
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Discussion of the North Meridian Area Plan:
4. Discussion of Storm Water Retention Ponds - Maintenance and
Landscape Issues:
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - November 16, 2004
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan: Presentation by Tim Tayot
(*25 minutes)
* Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - November 16, 2004 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
+ Shaun Wardle )c Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree )C Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
I#I~V-<-
3. Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan:
(*25 minutes) ~~ ~ 77;;;; r~
* Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - November 16, 2004 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
November 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 1 6, 2004
ITEM NO.
3
REQUEST Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT;
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materlals presented at public meetings shan become property of the City of Merldlan.
December 10, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
December 14, 2004
ITEM NO.
5-A
REQUEST Approve Minutes of November 16, 2004 Pre-Council Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETfLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Inifials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meeling, shall become property of the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan: Presentation by Tim Tayot
("'25 minutes)
'" Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - November 16, 2004 Page 1 of 1
All materIals presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
A_..___ ...1__:-:-__ __........................:I....i-:...... .-:-...... ...li..........""-=I::Li........ .._l_..._..... '-_ -l__..___.._ __....1..... L..........._:..........
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
November 16. 2004
The Meridian City Pre-Council meeting was called to order at 6:40 P.M. on
Tuesday, November 16,2004 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle,
Christine Donnell and Charlie Rountree.
Staff Present: Brad Watson, Bill Nary, Anna Canning, Gene Trakel, Kenny
Bowers and Will Berg.
Others Present: David Bivens, David Wynkoop, Sherry Hubert, John Franden,
Terry Little, Gary Inselman, Kelli F., David L.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X
X Christine Donnell
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Bird: I would entertain a motion to adopt the agenda.
Rountree: So moved.
Wardle: Second.
Bird: It's been moved and seconded. All in favor say aye. Opposed?
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 3.
Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan:
Bird: Okay, I think this is Steve Siddoway, or did you have to leave?
Canning: It's me.
Bird: It's you Anna?
Canning: Yeah. President Bird, members of the Council and Mayor I am just
going to do a brief introduction to Tim Taylor, who is a member of Faire and
Pierce who is the transportation part of the Tom Hudson team and with that I am
going to hand it over.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 2 of 5
Taylor: Thank you I appreciate being able to have about five minutes. We will
go through this quickl~ for you. My goal is to just give you an update. We came;
we were here the 19t of October and gave you an update. I want to give you a
feel for what we have done now and what we are learning. One of the key things
I want to point out again, is the importance in this process of making sure that we
have set the proper priorities and goals that we have collected and reviewed
previous research and data and that we are really following a process that allows
us to get input from the community. That's been so important in what we are
using as a multi-criteria evaluation that allows us to get that input and to develop
these alternatives and actually go through and do a detailed evaluation of each of
these alternatives. As you know, we have set some very specific goals and
objectives in three primary areas. The first one is in relation to the downtown
marketing strategy, making sure that any of the alternatives that we are looking
at, any of the options fulfill these goals and objectives clearly and that people are
aware that we are trying to do a balanced study here that blends not only
downtown marketing strategy ideas, but also issues related to the Ada County
Highway District and the need to blend these alternatives into a regional
transportation network system to minimize congestion and to get that balance
between through traffic and to traffic and also then the last one is to balance
those first two with our fiscal priorities to make sure that we have reasonable
project costs, reasonable maintenance costs and that we can provide an
alternative that allows us to do phased implementation if that's appropriate. So,
having set these goals and priorities, we are going through this multi-criteria
evaluation that allows us to wait these priorities and then evaluate the
alternatives based on those specific priority criteria. Just real quickly, there are
actually four alternatives. The first one as you remember is just a baseline
alternative and the baseline includes all the long-range improvements, the Ten
Mile Interchange, which is extremely important. The crossing of Under and
Locust Grove over 1-84 and some other refinements that are going to occur over
time. So this baseline condition is what we are using to compare all the other
alternatives too. The first alternative and these might be in a little bit of a
different order than you remember seeing them, but this is - the first alternative is
the one way couplet from the 1997 study. You know it's interesting we've tooked
at this corridor. The primary disadvantage to this particular alternative, in
addition to advantages is that this number of 15,700, which is the two-way daily
volume on this facility through the downtown area and really we have studied this
as a consulting team. We really have started leaning away from this particular
alternative because we don't feel like it is in harmony with the goals and
objectives of the downtown environment. The second one is taking and widening
Meridian from the section it is now to a five-lane section from Central up to
Fairview. And also reconfiguring the intersection of Central and Waltman and
providing for a better operations at this very congested intersection. One of the
key advantages to this alternative is that it shifts the traffic from Main Street,
which is now currently the higher volume street to Meridian and allows for this
movement from Franklin to the freeway to occur in an easier transition manner.
The other thing is that it takes traffic off of Main Street to a point where we feel
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 3 of 5
like the daily volumes are consistent with a type of environment that downtown is
looking to provide. So, that 75, 100 is an important point of this particular
interchange or alternative. You know as we have gone through looking at these
alternatives, we keep uncovering all kinds of different specific items, that in fact,
one of the things that we met with and talked with the Steering Committee about
today was some of the issues regarding project costs and right of way issues and
those types of impacts where we have been able to move from a fairly general
look at things to into some really specific items. This last alternative is what we
were calling that split corridor. It's unique in that we know that this southern half
of the corridor from a land use standpoint is really a freeway oriented business
area where there are a lot higher traffic volumes. Their businesses are oriented
towards automobile usage, rather than a pedestrian uses, like our downtown
area. We find that the volumes here are greater than they are in the northern
portion of the corridor. So, this alternative actually provides a couplet, but only
from the railroad corridor south to central. With all of these alternatives that I
have just showed you, one of the things that we have done is included an option
for providing access to this Waltman Lane parcel, which is a substantial amount
of land and so each of these alternatives is looking at specific intersection
operations at that intersection. One of the benefits we had just two or three
weeks ago is that ACHD went out and did brand new traffic counts on all the
intersections within the corridor for us. We will go through all these in detail, but
the numbers that are in white show what the existing traffic volume is. The
numbers that are in blue show what those volumes are expected to be in the
year 2030. So, you can start to get a feel throughout all these corridors about
how much traffic is anticipated to grow over the next 26 years. Where you don't
see a lot of growth is because these facilities are already at capacity. These
volumes are a P.M. peak hour volume; before we have been showing you daily
volumes. So, that is just to give you an idea of the fact that we were able to get
these new traffic volumes and start looking at things on an intersection by
intersection basis. I am missing a slide - I apologize. One of the things that we
have done with these traffic volumes is gone in and done a very detailed
intersection analysis where we are looking at the amount of delay that motorists
experience going through the intersections on an average basis. We have done
that for each alternative and you are familiar with the level of service criteria. It's
a skill that goes from A to F; A being the best where you have not a lot of
congestion, fairly free movements; F being where you have severe congestion;
you are maybe waiting through two or three cycles to get through a light. So,
what we have done is - here is a list of all our intersections that we are analyzing
as part of the corridor and then here is the existing conditions, with each
intersection being listed from A, the worst intersection here being Central and
Main, Meridian, which is at level service E, a failing condition. Our baseline
condition, which is again just the long-range improvements with traffic growth and
then our three alternatives. Now going back again to our priorities in those three
areas, this is only one particular element of those multi-criteria evaluation. But,
it's an important one from the perspective of the Ada County Highway District as
well as the city as we start thinking about providing for to traffic verses through
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 4 of 5
traffic. What we were finding is that the one-way couplet alternative from the
1997 study operated fairly well, but we did realize that at some of the key
junctions at Fairview and Main and some other streets where we have been
asked to look in more detail that there are some issues there, particularly with the
alternative B, widening Meridian at Fairview and Meridian and Franklin and
Meridian. The split corridor - the consultant team is leaning mostly towards this
alternative C, this split corridor, again, just from the perspective of the traffic
operations. As we met today with the Steering committee, it became clear that
what we are going to be doing to move forward is be more specific about the
criteria we are using. So we are going to start quantifying that criteria by doing
things like having a level of service at intersections, knowing how many homes
are being impacted, the right of way that is going to be required and some of the
project costs and so Ada County Highway District is going to be helping with the
project costs and some of these other issues as we continue to move forward,
getting into more of the specifics of these three particular alternatives. One of
the things that came out of our meeting today and it's the one recommendation
that we have for you tonight is that we hold a joint meeting with the ACHD
Commissioners and use the Councll and some of the representatives from the
Steering Committee. We would like to try and do that either the 14th or the 15th of
December and I believe that Steve is going to be coordinating with you on the
specifics of a meeting to go over some of these additional issues regarding
funding, regarding right of way costs and construction costs. That's my update.
Did I make it on time? Any questions?
Bird: Council any questions?
Rountree: Mr. President.
Bird: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: The difference in all the service at the Cherry Lane or Fairview in
Meridian between the split and the widened in Meridian seems to me that they
should be closer than a -
Taylor: Yeah and that is a good point. One of the things that we do in this
particular software program is optimize the cycle length, so you know, from the
time you get a green light it turns red and then you get a green light again. What
we found in this particular situation, the whole corridor is timed such that all of the
signals have a 90 second cycle length, whereas in this particular situation they
have about 125 second cycle length. Now that's what it optimized on for the
corridor, but based on our meeting today we are going to look more closely at
this particular situation.
Rountree: Thank you.
Meridian City Pre.Council Meeting
November 16, 2004
Page 5 of 5
Bird: Any more questions? Thank you, very much. That concludes our Pre-
Council meeting at 6:55 P.M. I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Rountree: So moved.
Wardle: Second.
Bird: It's been moved and seconded. All in favor? Opposed?
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:55 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
ATTESTED: JdL-A
/
(
** TX, olRI'I'lTION REPORT ** AS OF NOV 15 ' 04'" '-~, 13 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIWSEC PGS CMPIl STATUS
01 11/15 08'49 PUBLIC WORKS EC--S 00'25" 001 136 OK
02 11/15 08:50 8841159 EC--S 00' 26" 001 130 OK
IE 11/15 08=51 2088840744 EC--S 00'26" 1301 130 OK
04 11/15 00:52 POLICE DEPT EC--S 00' 26" 0131 130 OK
0S 11/15 08:53 8985501 EC-S 00'25" 001 130 OK
06 11/15 00:53 LIBRARY EC--S 00' 30" 001 130 OK
e7 11/15 08=56 3866924 EC-S 130' 25" 001 130 OK
09 11/15 08'57 2138 89S 0390 EC--S 00'25" 13131 130 OK
09 11/15 08:58 128300040 G3-S 013'29" 001 130 OK
10 11/15 08:59 2138 387 6393 EC--S 00'31" 1301 1313 OK
11 11/15 09:00 8865052 EC-S 130'25" 1301 13@ OK
12 11/15 09:01 CHERRY LANE 63--5 00'43" 0131 1313 OK
13 11115 09:ro IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--5 00'25" 001 130' OK
14 11/15 09:04 [0 PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00'25" 001 130 OK
15 11/15 139:05 2eaese6701 EC--S 130'25" 1301 130 OK
16 11/15 09'09 3810'160 EC--S 130'37" eel 1313 OK
17 11/15139'10 12084664405 EC--S 0e'26" 001 130 OK
18 11/15 09:11 92083776449 EC--S 00'25" 001 130 OK
19 11/15139'122088886854 EC--S 00'25" 1301 130 OK
20 11/1509:13 ADA cry DEVELMT EC--S 00'25" 001 130 OK
oW;;;;dzt:rn -.
~ JD^'iC>
'"
r.
"1"'/1. , _...~.
.... rm:..c,~,~ \ ,\>
Mr.yoa
Tammy d. Weerd
CITY COUNCIL M~MB~llS
William L. M. Nory
K"i~l Bi,d
c;h.rl~; M. Rvuntree
Shoun WMdle
erN OF-P~RTMEN\'$
r:~T~
540 E, Franl<:lin Road
888.12341fax 895-0390
Park. & R.~red!ion
11 E. Bower Street
666-3579 i fn>< 698.5501
l'lan.nit\!-j &. Zoning
660 E. WO(erLOWer Lone
S\\ite 202
S84.5533Hax 888-6654
PoliCe
1401 E. Watetlowor tano
S8S-6678/fox 6~6.7366
ll-ub~lI.": Works
660 E. Willerlower Lano
Suit. 200
898-55001 fax S98-9551
- Building
660 E. Wole'lowo, l.one
Suile 150
667-2211/ fax 861.1197
- Sewer (WWTP)
3101 N. T.n MH. Road
66$-1.19\ fI.~ 884-07014
- Water
IDS N. W. 8th Stroot
888-5242/1ox 884-1159
~rosG l:"~ r 10- \1)..b\....lQ.. NtrL\C,.L- \llW~~!
~'l~.
.j
)"",
lhlt
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian wjIJ hold a Pre-Council Meeling at City Council Chambers,
Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, ldaho, on Tuesday.
November is, 2004 at 6:30 P.M. The Meridian City Councif will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as wall as the following issue:
- Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 12th of November, 2004.
df~~
ClTY HAl.l. 33 CAST IDMW AVENUE M!::fOIJIAN. mArlO 83642 1208) 8R8-4433
un CI.~("-'''~ 1l1l1l.'I~11l ",,""', "'~UUIl~~~-I\\)( 884.8723 fl~ANC~ ~ UTllrry BllLING-~\X 887,4813 ltAYOR'S OFm:E-R1X 88HlW)
~l' 'V)L ~03~ for fJlIie. K.M~ ~ /htJillb, I,
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
_ Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan:
(*25 minutes)
* Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
f<,
~ P r CITY OF .B.!2.
L/Yl erldltiti~~J~; "'\
IDAHO .~
~~ /J
~(i /"'"
;,\ {I;/(.. I": TfiE_\..';;;I-H"~ V ,\I.~Jr"
rRtOSG YOs \- *0.- H.iliLLcL l\Jr"LtC-L' \l\CU'\.k:.st I
/ ( . '
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCfL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Keith Bird
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234/ fax 895-0390
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Council Chambers,
Parks & Recreation
11 E. Bower Street
888-3579/ fax 898-5501
Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday,
November 16,2004 at 6:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
Planning & Zoning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533/ fax 888-6854
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issue:
Police
1401 E. Water tower Lane
888-6678/ fax 846-7366
- Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500/ fax 898-9551
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211/fax 887-1297
- Sewer (WWTP)
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191/ fax 884-0744
dI~~
WILLIAM G. BERG,
~
-
DATED this 12th of November, 2004.
- Water
2235 N. W. 8th Street
888-5242/ fax 884-1159
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK -FAX 888.4218 HU~J.\j\ HESOURCES -FAX 884.8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING -F/\X 887.4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE- FAX 884.8119
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: Presented
4. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: Approve
B. License AQreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project: Approve
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: Presented
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: Approve
2. Meridian TIP: Discussed
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 1 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at leasl48 hours prior to the public meeting.
8. Tabled from November 9,2004: MI 04-015 Request for a Miscellaneous
application approval to allow a one-time lot division to separate an un-
platted parcel into two parcels in an l-L zone for MontaQue-Sauriol. LLC
by Montague-Sauriol, LLC - 1127 East Pine Avenue: Approve
9. FP 04-069 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 single-family residential
building lots and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-8 zone for
Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 by Capital Development - north of West
Ustick Road and east of North Under Road: Approve
10. FP 04-070 Request for Final Plat approval of 40 single-family residential
building lots and two common lots on 10.32 acres in an R-8 zone for
Roseleaf Subdivision No.2 by Uberty Development, Inc. - 3615 South
Locust Grove Road: Table to November 23, 2004 Meeting
11. Continued Public Hearing from November 3, 2004: AZ 04-025
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 121.96 acres from R4 (Ada County)
to R-4 zone for Vienna Woods Subdivision No. 1-7 and Edinburqh
Place Subdivision No. 1-2 by the City of Meridian - NEC of East
McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road: Prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Approval
12. Public Hearing: CUP 04-039 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
women's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherry
Crossinq Subdivision by Robnett Construction, Inc. - northwest corner
of Cherry Lane and Under Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
13. Public Hearing: CUP 04-038 Request for a coffee shop with a drive-thru
window in a C-C zone for EI Dorado Subdivision. Lot 6, Block 5 by
W.H. Moore Company - north west corner of East Overland Road and
Bonito Way and west of South Eagle Road: Prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Approval
14. Public Hearing: AZ 04-027 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.5
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Christian Family Matters, Inc. by Don
Weber - east of South Under Road and south of West Overland Road:
Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
15. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve
16. Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1 )(1): No
Decision
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888.4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
x
)(
Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree )C Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2.
Pledge of Allegiance:
&tfi. r
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: If't~
4. Adoption of the Agenda: &~ tr-e-
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: ~v.f...-
B. License Aqreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Proiect: CvJ?pr&VI-C
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: r~
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: ~
2.
Meridian TIP:
dtJ' uu uoI.-
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page I of2
All materials prescnted at public meetings shall become property ofthc City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please coutact the City Clerk's Oftice at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
8.
Tabled from November 9,2004: MI 04-015 Request for a Miscellaneous
application approval to allow a one-time lot division to separate an un-
platted parcel into two parcels in an I-L zone for Montaque-Sauriol. LLC
by Montague-Sauriol, LLC -1127 East Pine Avenue: ~rOvJl.-
FP 04-069 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 single-family residential
building lots and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-B zone for
Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 by Capital Development - north of West
Ustick Road and east of North Under Road: Clf'r'"P~
FP 04-070 Request for Final Plat approval of 40 single-family residential
building lots and two common lots on 10.32 acres in an R-B zone for
Roseleaf Subdivision No.2 by Liberty Development, Inc. - 3615 South
Locust Grove Road: ~fX..L !t1/f-23-04'-
9.
10.
11.
Continued Public Hearing from November 3, 2004: AZ 04-025
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 121.96 acres from R4 (Ada County)
to R-4 zone for Vienna Woods Subdivision No. 1-7 and EdinburQh
Place Subdivision No. 1-2 by the City of Meridian - NEe of East
McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road:
;In (Jif/U? ?( -F I c/...f fVy tfVp)'?YOvd
Public Hearing: CUP 04-039 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
women's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherry
Crossin~ Subdivision by Robnett Construction, Inc. - northwest corner
of Cherry Lane an9/Under Road:
~f/tv--e -h'F;' c(.{ ~ ~v~
Public Hearing: CUP 04-038 Request for a coffee shop with a drive-thru
window in a C-C zone for EI Dorado Subdivision. Lot 6. Block 5 by
W.H. Moore Company - north west corner of East Overland Road and
Bonito Way and west of South Eagle Road:
pr.e jJ ~ -:f /.;:: f' c/./ ,?r A/f777V v UZ-
Public Hearing: AZ 04-027 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.5
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Christian Familv Matters. Inc. by Don
Weber - east of South Under Road and south of West Overland Road:
J)-refJtN-I-t ~I f-I cl..e ff-r. wppnPV'~
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: #-fjVyO ~
Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(f):
~ ~U"T/~
II,Pn:?//~ C~~u. ~6U i c~ ~ ~ /WI <p <lPc-ee~
8',,;J'SIJtJ. "$ .
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours ptiorto the public meeting.
November 24, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING
APPLICANT
November 30, 2004
ITEM NO.
5..C
REQUEST Approve Minutes of November 16, 2004 City Council Regular Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE OEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~/
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meellngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Phone:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: Presented
4. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: Approve
B. License Aareement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Proiect: Approve
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: Presented
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: Approve
2. Meridian TIP: Discussed
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 1 of2
(
8. Tabled from November 9, 2004: MI 04-015 Request for a Miscellaneous
application approval to allow a one-time lot division to separate an un-
platted parcel into two parcels in an I-L zone for Montaaue~Sauriol. LLC
by Montague~Sauriol, LLC - 1127 East Pine Avenue: Approve
9. FP 04-069 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 single-family residential
building lots and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-8 zone for
Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 by Capital Development - north of West
Ustick Road and east of North Linder Road: Approve
10. FP 04-070 Request for Final Plat approval of 40 single-family residential
building lots and two common lots on 10.32 acres in an R~8 zone for
Roseleaf Subdivision No.2 by Liberty Development, Inc. - 3615 South
Locust Grove Road: Table to November 23, 2004 Meeting
11. Continued Public Hearing from November 3, 2004: AZ 04-025
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 121.96 acres from R4 (Ada County)
to R-4 zone for Vienna Woods Subdivision No. 1-7 and Edinburah
Place Subdivision No. 1 ~2 by the City of Meridian - NEC of East
McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road: Prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Approval
12. Public Hearing: CUP 04-039 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
women's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherry
Crossina Subdivision by Robnett Construction, Inc. - northwest corner
of Cherry Lane and Linder Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
13. Public Hearing: CUP 04-038 Request for a coffee shop with a drive-thru
window in a C-C zone for EI Dorado Subdivision. Lot 6. Block 5 by
W.H. Moore Company - north west comer of East Overland Road and
Bonito Way and west of South Eagle Road: Prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Approval
14. Public Hearing: AZ 04-027 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.5
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Christian Familv Matters. Inc. by Don
Weber - east of South Linder Road and south of West Overland Road:
Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
15. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve
16. Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67~2345 (1)(f): No
Decision
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16, 2004 Page 2 of2
All materials Dresented at Dublic meetin!!s shall become OTOoertV ofthe Citv of Meridian.
Meridian City Council Meetinq
Novem ber 16. 2004.
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:05 P.M.,
Tuesday, November 16, 2004, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Charlie Rountree, Shaun
Wardle, and Christine Donnell.
Others Present: Bill Nary, Will Berg, Anna Canning, Brad Watson, Gene Trekel, Kenny
Bowers, and Dean Willis.
Item 1:
Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X
X Christine Donnell
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: Okay. I will go ahead and call the regular City Council meeting to order. It
is Tuesday, November 16th. It's 7:05. Welcome. We appreciate you being here with
us tonight. I will ask the city clerk to, please, start with roll call attendance.
Item 2:
Pledge of Allegiance:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 2 is the pledge of allegiance and we have Jared Coleman
with us tonight from Troop 128 who will lead us in the pledge. Please rise.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Item 3:
Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God:
De Weerd: Thank you, Jared. Actually, Jared, I have a gift for you for leading us
tonight. Our City of Meridian pin. Thank you. Okay. Item NO.3 is the community
invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner with the Meridian Assembly of God Church. I will ask
you to, please, join us in the community invocation or take this opportunity for a moment
of silence.
Kreiner: Thank you for the privilege of praying. Lord, we know this isn't a church
service, it is a city meeting, but I thank you that your scriptures indicate that unless the
Lord guards the city, the watchmen labor in vain. So, tonight we are asking that the
labors of this City Council, the labors of our Mayor, and those who are involved in this
evening, would not be in vain, but we would be able to know the guarding and guiding
and leading of the Lord. So, we seek your wisdom and your favor and we seek your
protection and guidance and guardianship over our city. I ask this in Jesus' name,
amen.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 2 of 35
Item 4:
Adoption of the Agenda:
De Weerd: Thank you. Pastor, I also have a gift for you as well, our City of Meridian
pin. Thank you. Okay. Item No.4 is adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the agenda as published.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve the agenda as published. All those in favor
say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5:
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. License AQreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project:
De Weerd: Item 5 is the Consent Agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I cannot believe the size of this Consent Agenda. J think in seven years I have
never seen one this small. But, anyway, I would move that we approve the Consent
Agenda and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper papers.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. Is there any discussion?
Rountree: Would we want to add some things?
Bird: You want to add some.
De Weerd: Mr. Clerk.
Meridian City Council
November 16. 2004
Page 3 of 35
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 6:
Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 6, Department Reports. We will start with our city attorney
on administrative leave policies.
Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I'm going to pass down --
this is a proposed administrative leave with pay policy that I have worked on since I
came on board about a month ago. Our normal process would be to have this as a
discussion item for our Pre-Council agendas, but we have had such a congestion lately
of some other projects in our Pre-Council, I just wanted to take the opportunity tonight to
deliver that to you to give you the opportunity to review it. If it meets your approval, I
would be bringing it forward to put it on our expanded Consent Agenda in a week or
two, with a resolution and, then, be able to add it to our policy and procedure manual.
Just to give you a real quick thumbnail, what this is is it's to give some discretionary
opportunity to directors for a couple of different reasons on some needs on whether an
employee should be excused from the workplace with pay. One of the things that was
brought to my attention was that because we have a policy that doesn't allow
employees to take leave within the first six months of their employment, that they
occasionally do get into some hardship situations on circumstances with employees that
department directors have exercised discretion in allowing employees some
discretionary leave for limited circumstances, family illnesses, funerals, things like that,
that didn't necessarily fall within the letter of the policy that's already existing, but it was
something that was important and necessary for the employee. This is just to put some
framework around that type of practice. I also included in there circumstances where it
may be a situation where an investigation of some sort may be occurring and it may be
necessary to remove the employee from the workplace for either their protection or the
city's, but, again, using some discretion and allowing that to be done to efficiently
maintain the operation of the business. At the last section of it, the application portion,
there is a couple different criteria that department directors need to meet to allow this
type of discretionary leave to be used and at some level of it the Mayor or yourself, the
Council, will have some opportunity to provide some input as to whether that's
appropriate or not, but if you wouldn't mind, at least within the next week, take a look at
it. If you have any concerns or issues about it, please, get a hold of me and if it seems
all right, if you'd let me know next week, I can bring it forward, we can put it on consent,
with a resolution to, then, have it added to our policy handbook. That's aliI have.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 4 of 35
Bird: Not right now, Mayor.
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk:
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Bill. Item B is -- you have in your packet a letter from
ACHD. I need to get information to them tomorrow on ranking of community programs
on the curb, gutter, and sidewalk projects. They have four listed and they would like
prioritization of those four or -- and I would like your feedback on that.
Donnell: This evening? Right now?
De Weerd: Yes. Right this minute, because tomorrow is the deadline. Well, not
tomorrow. Friday. And you know ACHD they are taskmasters.
Donnell: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mrs. Donnell.
Donnell: As I look at the four choices and think about, I guess, the routes that I take
and where I see that it may be really important to have curb, gutter, and sidewalk, with
the addition of Cole Valley High School to our community and the students walking in
that area, it seems as if 2 1/2 Street would be a high priority.
De Weerd: Council, any other question or comments? Gary, could you maybe tell us
how these projects were identified? Nothing like catching you off guard.
Inselman: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I'm afraid I don't have a copy of
what you're looking at.
De Weerd: I guess I could give you a copy, but it's on my screen. Mr. Clerk, do you
have a copy of that?
Nary: Madam Mayor, I could --
De Weerd: Yes.
Inselman: I'm not sure it would help. The short answer is I don't know how they were
prioritized.
De Weerd: Anna, did your staff have something to do with these particular projects
being submitted? It did mention that they were compiled from applications submitted to
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 5 of 35
ACHD by citizens, cities, and neighborhood associations, and since we don't have
neighborhood associations, did the city have anything to do with this?
Canning: I do believe that Steve Siddoway attended the meeting. It's separate from the
other sidewalk issues that are going on, so he had a couple of different sidewalk
committees going, but I do believe he did meet with ACH staff regarding those
improvements. I don't -- I'm not exactly sure on how they were arranged. I remember
that that was an issue of concern throughout the project, because there were
neighborhood associations kind of carried a little more weight and since we didn't have
an identified neighborhood association, there was some issues as to how they would
fare in comparison to other projects in Ada County. That was the only issue I remember
hearing about. I don't remember that the priorities within Meridian were contentious or
disputed amongst them. I think it was more of how Meridian would rank against some
of the larger -- the larger city to the east was the question.
Inselman: Madam Mayor, if it would help, I could find out tomorrow where these
requests came from and forward it to Will to get to you.
De Weerd: Okay. I think that would be helpful.
Donnell: Madam Mayor, as Councilman Wardle pointed out, three of these have to do
with proximity to schools. So, it would be hard, I think, to prioritize them. Perhaps they
just all need to be done.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: The third item down, the West 8th one on the east side, that's right across from
the middle school and that is probably your highest traffic and density. I happen to be
one that's went by that for 30 years. I know I shutter in the mornings with the kids being
dropped off and stuff. Thank God we do have a cross lane there and people do abide
by it. But 2 1/2 is -- I don't know how -- how you really prioritize these, because they are
all very very important and I don't know how you could say one's more important than
the other one.
De Weerd: I guess I would agree that the middle school has a very high priority, since I
have been one of those cars dropping off a child there. It is a little frightening seeing
how some of that works. If I can get the information from Gary, I can forward it to you
via e-mail, and perhaps you can just give me your feedback and I will get this submitted
by their deadline on Friday. Lieutenant Trekel, if you could -- I had forwarded a copy of
this to our traffic safety committee. I don't know if they had a chance to discuss it. If
you could find out from one of the committee members and I know that Captain Overton
is out of town, but I believe Gene takes minutes. If they were able to discuss this, if you
can let me know what the outcome of that discussion was. Okay. Thank you.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 6 of 35
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: And just to point out one more thing, it seems that all four of them have to do
with safe routes to schools and the first one -- just to make note, we had an application
here at the city earlier, which dealt with this exact issue, West 1 st Street. Some of the
residents talked about their accessibility and need for that sidewalk and so, certainly,
they are all worthy projects, but as far as what this Council is seeing, we did have some
specific requests on that West 1 st Street. And I believe our direction was -- from the
Council to go back and to work with the highway district to -- to bring some resolution for
those residents.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, then, I guess I would suggest and look for your feedback, if
we listed West 8th Street as number one, West 1 st Street as number two, 2 1/2 as
number three, and Waltman as number four?
Rountree: Got it right.
Bird: I'd buy that, Mayor. I would definitely buy that.
Donnell: Uh-huh.
De Weerd: Okay. But I -- if, Gary, you can still get us that information, that would be
helpful. Okay. I will, then, draft a letter and let them know what the priority order is on
this.
2. Meridian TIP:
De Weerd: Okay. The second item was regarding the Meridian TIP. I did get a copy of
it from Brad Hawkins-Clark and I did talk to Bruce Mills earlier tonight. What was sent
over to them just rearranged the priorities three and four and we had more discussion
on that. Unfortunately, that pre-Council meeting was not taped. So, I hope he's
forwarding you a copy of that TIP and look for comments as well on that. But I have told
ACHD that we did revise that somewhat and I would get those to them.
Rountree: What's their response time, Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: They said they still had a little bit of time.
Bird: Don't tell us that, give us a date, or you will be a month from now waiting for some
reply.
De Weerd: I will get something out to you also via e-mail for your comment and Bruce
was going to tell me the last date as well and, Gary, you might remind him of that.
(
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 7 of 35
Item 7:
(Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
De Weerd: Okay. There were no items moved from the two items on our Consent
Agenda.
Item 8:
Tabled from November 9, 2004: MI 04-015 Request for a Miscellaneous
application approval to allow a one-time lot division to separate an un-
platted parcel into two parcels in an l-L zone for Montaque-Sauriol. LLC
by Montague-Sauriol, LLC - 1127 East Pine Avenue:
De Weerd: So, we will move on to Item No.8, tabled from November 9th, 2004, MI 04-
015. Start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for a reduction in
platting requirements for the property that's located at the end of -- it's on -- it's south of
Pine and Commercial stubs to it from the east. It's about a quarter mile west of Locust
Grove Road. The owner came in and staff did suggest that this would be an opportunity
to qualify for one of these reductions in platting requirements. As staff got into the
analysis of this issue, we kept on finding a number of issues that kept on adding it up
and staff is coming forward with a recommendation for denial today. This is the
requested split. It's for about three-quarters of an acre here down at the southeast
corner of the property and it would line up -- the center line of that new property would
line up with this center line -- or the north property line, I'm sorry, would line up with the
center line of Commercial Avenue. I'm going to go through the reasons that staff has
come forward with this recommendation. As you know, this is a fairly new process for
the city to be doing and part of it is that staff is unclear on how far we want to take these
reduction in platting requirements, particularly for some of these un-platted properties,
and it isn't a guaranteed lot split, it is just at the discretion of staff as to which, if any,
platting requirements that they may want to waive and, then, it says that if it's un-platted
property, then, we come forward to you and that's why we are here today. First of all,
there is some question -- well, the circulation is one of the larger issues related to this
property. We have a letter from MDC requesting that the split be denied, because they
want to facilitate the extension of Broadway through to Commercial, this being one of
those key pieces. An applicant or developer is -- has to go through the subdivision
process to dedicate right of way and this is an issue that's cropping up around town
lately. ACHD currently does not have a mechanism for accepting right of way, unless
it's done through the subdivision process. So, both -- the MDC has requested that this
be required to go through the subdivision process in order that Commercial will be
stubbed to this west property boundary. The second issue is there is some question as
to whether this property should be eligible for the lot split provision. It was -- the original
parcel of record includes what's now platted as Railroad Park Subdivision. Now, at the
time staff didn't require the full parcel of record to be included within the subdivision.
This was left off of that subdivision. So, there does seem to be a question as to whether
it should be eligible. And, again, because we haven't done that many of these, we are
trying to find out where City Council is comfortable going as far as these requirements,
as well as staff. But it does not, technically, meet the original parcel or lot of record
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 8 of 35
requirement, because it's been previously subdivided. Now, that's a little different from
previously split. So, previous splits would be very clear. Now, having had some of it
subdivided is not as clear to staff. And I don't know if that made any sense, but you can
ask me questions. The other issue is one with the Comp Plan. The Comp Plan does
have this area here as mixed use and my understanding is that when it went through
the Comprehensive Plan hearings, there was -- this area, in particular, was looked at as
a key transition from the downtown and this industrial property here and, then, the
single family residential to the north and this is clearly the largest of those properties
and will have a big impact. Having said that, Ada County has purchased this property
and the uses they have described to us that they are proposing so far do seem to go
with that mixed-use category. They have got a number of county functions that they
want to place there. I think they are still trying to refine what those are. But they do
seem to be a good mix between having some offices, having some yards, having -- you
know, that are kind of more industrial in nature and, actually, transitioning on the
property itself. Another reason is that the entire property is within the Five Mile Creek
one hundred year flood plain. So, there are some issues regarding elevating structures,
how much fill they are going to bring in, and normally we don't look at any of those
issues with these splits, we would look at them more with a subdivision. The fifth
reason -- there is -- it's a matter of just getting some of the requirements that are in the
landscape ordinance that we don't have as much control over a certificate of zoning
compliance as we do with a subdivision. We have been requiring a five-foot landscape
buffer along the Union Pacific railroad. That landscape buffer assumes that a multi-use
pathway will go at the northern edge of the Union Pacific railroad right of way and, then,
the landscape ordinance does require a five-foot buffer along the multi-use pathway.
So, the Comprehensive Plan shows a multi-use pathway on the railroad corridor. We
have traditionally treated that as following that northern boundary and, then, provided
the landscape buffers to the north of that. Finally, there was some concern from the fire
marshal regarding water supply, but the Public Works Department has had an
opportunity to evaluate that and there doesn't seem to be a concern and if you have
more questions on that, Brad can fully answer that. So, again, it's kind of -- it just kind
of added up to the point where staff didn't feel comfortable recommending approval of
this application, but we were eager to hear Council's thoughts, and the applicant has
crafted a very well worded letter, I noticed, too, in response to staffs -- the staff report.
And with that I will end staffs presentation.
De Weerd: Council, any questions of staff?
Mayor: I have none, Mayor.
Donnell: None.
Rountree: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. Would the applicant like to make comment? Please state your
name and address.
(
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 9 of 35
Montague: It's Roy Montague, 199 Rooster Drive, Eagle, and I'm the managing
member of the Montague-Sauriol, LLC, And this is kind of a first for me. Thank you. I
do want to say that staff has been pretty wonderful to work with. It's been a
cooperative, supportive thing, and, basically, what I'm going to conclude with is that
whichever process we use, we are going to end up in the same place, and I'd like to
think that because we have started this miscellaneous application, as originally
suggested by staff, that we follow through on it. It will allow us to complete this project
within the time frame that we are interested in. As Anna already explained, the property
was sold to Ada County, with an option for Montague-Sauriol to have that one little
corner. And the reason we want that one little corner is to put up a building for a
business that's over on Lanark Street. It's called Ready-Made Plastic Trays, which is a
wonderful business. We get recycled plastic and we make trays and we send the
leftovers back for more recycling. I have put a couple of photos at the very end. I think
you all have the little presentation I put together and I put a couple of photos of buildings
that we built in Oregon and I like to think that we do nice buildings and our type of
business fits in very well with what's going on immediately to the east of the property
that we want to develop, which is the -- I believe called Railside Development, which is
light industrial. When we bought the property it was light industrial and, then, shortly
thereafter it was -- I guess not really rezoned, but whatever the term is, it's now mixed
use. And I think it's a wonderful deal for the city and the county for this transitional thing
from industrial to residential, as Anna already mentioned. As I already said, when we
finished this project -- or finished the application process, we are going to be in the
same place, we are going to meet all of the city's requirements and allowing us to move
ahead, it's -- right now the option will terminate the end of April and the regular process,
it's probably going to extend beyond that. I don't know that we can't extend that option,
that's going to be up to county, but, certainly, if we went ahead with this miscellaneous
application there would be no question about that. Any questions?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Council -- yes, Mr. Bird.
Bird: Sir, we have got to get a right of way through there for Broadway Street and that's
not real clear on that map where Broadway Street is, but I kind of got --
Canning: The Broadway -- current Broadway right of way extends to that point there,
sir.
Bird : Yes. It goes to Precision Logs.
Canning: It goes -- yeah, about halfway -- just right to there. It doesn't go through this
whole property, it only goes part way.
Bird: And to make our downtown area viable, we feel that we need that right of way
through there to bring Broadway all the way east to hook up to Locust Grove. Do you
have any problem with doing that? And it would -- it would be a better deal if you're
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 10 of 35
(
taking out two-thirds of an acre in the southeast corner, it would be -- to have a road, it
would give you a little more frontage there.
Montague: Well, we need a road, but I think that's going to happen regardless of --
that's almost a given, I believe, that Commercial will extend through to Broadway. And
it's more up to Ada County and their application process, than it is our little southeast
corner.
Bird: How far off do you come -- how far is your two-thirds of an acre coming off there?
Montague: Well, it's a hundred feet--
Bird: From the right of way?
Montague: Oh, well, the way we originally platted it with the county, it would go to the
center of Commercial when it gets extended, but now we are talking about putting it
right to the edge of Commercial. It makes no difference to me. Did that answer your
question?
Bird: Yes, it did. Thank you.
De Weerd: So, basically, what you're saying is your piece would not impede on the
extension of those roads?
Montague: No.
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions, Council?
Canning: Madam Mayor, just to clarify that, if it's brought down 25 feet, then, it would
not impede. There is no frontage requirement in the I-L, so it would still be a build-able
parcel. It would not require frontage on Commercial at this time. He could have a
cross-access agreement with Ada County to get access to Commercial.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Montague: That's it? All right. Thank you.
De Weerd: Mr. Logan, do you have anything to add?
Logan: Thank you, Mayor, City Council. Will. It's always great to come back to
Meridian.
De Weerd: Please state your name and address.
Logan: Dave Logan, 9200 Lyle Street, Boise.
Meridian City Council
November 16. 2004
Page 11 of 35
De Weerd: Thank you.
Logan: But it's nice to come back to a place that I have always called kind of my home.
My hometown. But, anyway, Ada County intends on meeting ACHD and Meridian
Planning and Zoning requirements for the full development of the county's property. We
plan to work very closely with ACHD and your staff in meeting the goals that you have
set for your community. It's critical for funding purposes that the proposed split and
purchase of the property proceed without delay. We, of course, respectfully request
that you consider approving the proposed division and allow the reduction in platting
requirements at this phase of the development. Ada County has no problem with
extending Commercial to the -- I believe it would be the west property line. We
anticipate that our planning process for that site to take a considerable amount of time.
We have very high hopes and very elaborate plans for the property and we'd like to do it
right the first time. We'd also like the site to be a green development, a sustainable site
that is an asset to the City of Meridian. We look -- we anticipate taking months in our
planning process. This would allow us to get started and proceed in the planning
process. We are not delaying our process at aIL As a matter of fact, I have scheduled
our first coordination meeting for the 24th of this month and we do anticipate it -- you
know, right before Thanksgiving the sheriff and major department heads in Ada County
are going to come down to the courthouse and we are going to start on the planning
process. We do not plan to subdivide. We do not plan at this time to sell any of the
property off. We plan to make it an Ada County site. We do plan on working with
ACHD on right of way and we have a long history of working with them successfully
together and in getting that land transferred to ACHD and making the roads part of their
system. Hopefully, I could probably answer a few questions about what we intend to do
with the property or any questions that you may have concerning it.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Dave. Council, do you have any questions?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: You indicated that the county has no qualms with extending Commercial to
the west boundary. And you also indicated you don't plan on selling any additional
parcels. Does the remainder on the south end fit with your planning purposes?
Logan: Let's put it that way. It doesn't interfere. There is some wetlands back in -- in
that one corner there and -- which will make it a little difficult, but we will -- we are going
to accommodate that. We had originally started sketching out small departments on
where we would put them in a campus-type setting. We can live with that kind of little
landlocked place between Roy's piece and that wetland and we can accommodate that.
Rountree: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Any other questions, Council?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 12 of 35
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, if I could, our ordinance would not
allow a road dedication that created those kind of two distinct parcels like that. So, it
would -- just for clarification, it would need to be done as a subdivision to dedicate that
right of way.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Anna, you jumbled my mind, which isn't hard to do, but on the north end of that
little parcel that Roy wants through now?
Canning: Yes, sir.
De Weerd: Did you say that was already dedicated for a road or did I misunderstand?
Canning: No, sir. Just to the -- Dave, if you could just duck for a moment.
Logan: Why don't I just sit down.
Canning: The centerline of Commercial Avenue lines up right now with the north
property boundary. So, if the Council chooses to go forward, what I would suggest that
you give staff a week to come up with the appropriate conditions of approval. The main
one being that this line needs to drop down 25 feet, so that it would be parallel with the
south end of the right of way for Commercial Avenue and, then, they would need to
have some sort of cross-access agreement to allow getting into that. That way when
the county is ready to subdivide and dedicate right of way, then, they would have full
access to that Commercial Avenue extension.
Bird: Thank you, Anna.
De Weerd: Okay. So, you're suggesting to table this until next week, so you can get
appropriate comments and the applicant can get us a new plat or at least description of
what you're doing that shows the adjustment to allow for the roads. Is that reasonable?
Canning: Mr. Montague is saying that he's not sure that we couldn't just do that with a
written condition of approval and I would agree that we probably don't need a new
survey at this time. We could write it sufficiently. If that's the way the Council wants to
go, then, staff will make that work.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Madam Mayor. Anna, I have two questions. One, if -- and the staff
recommended that we try the miscellaneous use application? That's correct?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 13 of 35
Canning: Yes, we did. And I had committed that if the Council didn't want to approve
this, that I would ask that that amount of fees be waived on the new application, just as
a note.
Wardle: Okay. Just to follow up to that, help me understand where the application
would be at if it were through the regular subdivide -- subdividing process, with the
delays and the tabling. Ballpark.
Canning: I'm looking for when the application was submitted. It was submitted on
October 11th. So, the cutoff -- it would have made the October 15th cutoff, perhaps,
which would put it out to the December Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and,
then, it would go to City Council in January or so.
Wardle: Okay. And, Madam Mayor, another follow up. If we were to approve this lot
split with some of the recommendations that we have made as far as the road, would
the county have to come back and subdivide their piece to be able to dedicate that right
of way?
Canning: Yes. Now, if they chose not to dedicate right of way, then, they would not. If
they chose to build private streets or drive aisles that they would maintain, then, they
would not be required. And that was part of staff's concern, is that if that decision were
made in the future, then, we would not have that opportunity to get that. Now, they
have committed that they want to have publicly dedicated streets.
Wardle: And, Madam Mayor, if I could ask a question of Mr. Logan. Just to follow up
on what Anna said, is it the intent of the county to bring this application through after
you have done your planning process, to subdivide it, so that that right of way could be
dedicated?
Logan: If that's the only process for us to transfer that road to ACHD, that would be the
process. We don't -- we don't,intend on maintaining the streets ourselves. We'd like the
experts to do it. Thank you.
De Weerd: We appreciate that. Okay. Anything else, Council? Okay. What would
you like to do?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve MI 04-015 application for two-thirds of an acre
parcel and to have the developer, applicant, and staff through letter get 25 feet on the
north end of the property, go south 25 feet, and get it dedicated for future road right of
way.
Donnell: I'll second that.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 14 of 35
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve with the stated condition. Is there any
discussion?
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Mr. Bird, we have a list of four or five
standard conditions that we have been putting on these. I don't have a list of those
available. One of them I know is that the -- that they submit a lot line application to
actually effect the lot line adjustment. Would the maker of the motion be amenable to
adding those standard conditions of approval?
Bird: The standard conditions that we put on it? That would be part of the motion, yes,
ma'am.
De Weerd: Does the second agree?
Donnell: The second agrees.
De Weerd: Okay. And I guess since you draw up those findings, are you comfortable
with everything you need to put in there?
Canning: Pardon me? I didn't hear the last part.
De Weerd: Since you draw up the findings, do you have all the information you need to
draw those up?
Canning: I believe so. Yes.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion, Council?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Just a question for Council. Are the comments this evening a matter of
record in any way, shape, or form binding?
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council-member Rountree, are you
talking about the statement from Mr. Logan about their future plans?
Rountree: Yes.
Nary: Not -- probably not in the sense of what you mean by binding. Certainly I trust
Mr. Logan's intent today and what he's telling us. Whether that may change in the new
year or when those plans get developed, could the city, then, require those to become
public streets within the project based on what Mr. Logan's statements were today?
Probably not.
"
{
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 15 of 35
Rountree: Madam Mayor, follow-up question?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Future development of this parcel would be subject to Conditional Use
Permit?
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I don't believe so. I mean depending
what they wanted to do. If it's an allowed use -- it's not -- it's not -- I don't believe so. I
can't see the map from here, but I don't believe that that property by itself requires
conditional use. It may be depending on what the uses are going to be, but if it was an
allowed use, I don't -- I can't see it from here, but I think it's light industrial or industrial
property.
Canning: Madam Mayor, it's zoned light industrial. It does have a mixed-use
designation on the Comp Plan. I can look up -- there were some Comp Plan mixed use
designations that require conditional use approval. I believe it's only the regional,
though, and I can look that up really fast, if Council would like me to.
Nary: At least, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, most of the uses that the
county would likely use it for, office space and those types of things, are probably going
to have conditional use needs to those. Some of the uses, whether it be for
maintenance yards or things like that, may not required that, unless it's depending --
Mrs. Canning would know better than I would -- depending on the types of materials that
they wanted to have, the site may require some conditional use, but I don't know
specifically.
De Weerd: But it does sound like because there will be a road, they do need a plat; is
that correct? Or do a subdivision?
Canning: If they decide to dedicate a road, then, it would be required to go through a
plat process. And, then, Madam Mayor, if I could -- I'm sorry for jumping in so much.
You asked me a question. I think I answered a little prematurely. One of the standard
conditions we sometimes put on, sometimes not, has been exactly a requirement that
they submit a plat prior to the final occupancy on this split parcel. Now, I'm assuming in
this case that that's -- it's inconsistent with what they have asked for as far as testimony,
so I'm assuming that the Council does not want that condition added, but I thought I'd
better check.
Bird: Not for that one little lot, no.
De Weerd: No.
Canning: Pardon?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 16 of 35
Bird: Not for that one little lot. There would be no reason to plat that.
Canning: Thank you.
De Weerd: For this lot.
Bird: For this --
Canning: For the larger lot.
Bird: -- the one we are passing on right now.
De Weerd: No. She means for the larger lot.
Canning: One of the standard conditions that we have had is that they submit -- we did
this on the Goddains split, the first one that came through. We didn't do it on a smaller
industrial one. But we required that both properties be the subject of a subdivision plat
and that application be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department and accepted
for process prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the split property.
Bird: Anna, you got me confused again. No. I think I know what you're talking about.
And that would be -- if that's the way this application is, then, yeah, they will have to
have a plat for the rest of the deal. Now, if we are just passing on this single little two-
thirds of an acre or whatever it is, splitting that, then, I don't -- you wouldn't need a plat
on that.
Nary: It's all an issue of timing.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Madam Mayor, just a question for Mr. Nary. Could we place upon this
provision a condition that the larger parcel come back with a plat before occupancy of
that parcel?
De Weerd: And that is what Anna made suggestion on.
Nary: Well, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council-member Wardle, I think
what Mrs. Canning said and what we have done is we have required -- and it seems like
it's just a matter of timing. We have required the plat for both parcels prior to occupancy
of the smaller parcel.
Wardle: Right.
Nary: And I think what all Council-member Wardle is saying is rather than requiring it
for both parcels, can we just require it for the county, the larger piece, and not tie it to
the occupancy of the smaller piece. And I guess we haven't done that previously and I
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 17 of 35
don't know -- because I didn't hear from Mr. Logan what their timing is on whether or not
the county is of a mind that they are going to be -- because I did hear -- I did hear that
the smaller parcel piece was March or April was when they needed to exercise their
option and I don't know when the other piece is intending to be brought forward. So, I
don't know whether or not the applicant can concur with either one of those conditions.
De Weerd: Well, we do have a motion on the floor and we are in the discussion phase.
I could ask Mr. Logan if he has comment.
Bird: I would be in favor of that
Logan: Ada County does not have any problem following the Conditional Use Permit
process and it's awfully hard to kind of speculate what's going to be developed and
exactly where, but our preliminary plans show the -- I believe Commercial going all the
way through and also shows the road going -- tying in up to Pine Street. It's going to
take us awhile to do that and -- but we have no problems following the conditional use
process and I believe you will see a final plat and our intended uses at that time and
before we actually start construction on any of our projects on the site.
De Weerd: Mr. Logan, will you have a preliminary idea to -- to staff by next March?
Logan: By this April?
De Weerd: Yes.
Logan: No.
De Weerd: Okay.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would -- with the second agreement; I would put a stipulation on my motion that
any other property within this development will be through CUP. Any development. If
the second would agree to that? I think that takes care of our worries.
Donnell: I'd agree.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I think that the issue still is would they
still have to plat the other piece and when the timing of that plat's going to be. Do you
want it tied to this smaller piece -- I'm trying to mind meld with Mrs. Canning here, but I
think that's -- I think that's the issue is certainly putting the requirement of the CUP
solves the issue of seeing this again and being able to approve whatever -- whatever
(
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 18 of 35
the county decides to do with it, but there still isn't a platting requirement to the other
piece yet and when timing -- or when that is effective. But Mrs. Canning can probably
answer when she needs that -- when she needs something on that
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the code gives the city engineer and
I the authority to require some or all of the platting requirements. Requiring a
Conditional Use Permit is not one of the platting requirement, so I'm not sure that that
option is open this evening, Mr. Bird. I think that -- I think that Council-member Wardle's
condition -- or suggestion may be -- may be the best answer from what I'm hearing the
concerns of Council. It sounds like maybe we could place the condition that any future
development of the large remainder property go through the subdivision process before
any certificate of occupancy is issued on that property. That leaves the timing strictly at
Ada County's discretion. It still gets a plat requirement on there and that is within the
boundaries of this application to require full platting on that property. We are just
specifying it at a later time.
Bird: Okay. I'm willing to add that to the motion. I'm not going to repeat it.
De Weerd: Do you know what she's adding to your motion?
Bird: Yeah, I do. We will take off the CUP and we will add that on the parcel left off and
this property will be brought through subdivision-wise. Is that right?
Canning: Yes, sir. Thank you.
Bird: If the second agrees.
Donnell: And the second agrees.
De Weerd: And just for my clarification, it's that they have to plat before they can have
a CO on any building in that --
Canning: Yes, ma'am.
De Weerd: Okay.
Rountree: Madam Mayor, no questions.
De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 9:
FP 04-069 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 single-family residential
building lots and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-8 zone for
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 19 of 35
Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 by Capital Development - north of
West Ustick Road and east of North Linder Road:
De Weerd: Well, the record's going to be very important on this one, Dean, so -- okay.
Item NO.9 is FP 04-069. We will start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for a final plat
approval of 35 single family residential building lots and three common lots on 10.17
acres in an R-8 zone. This is for Baldwin Park Subdivision. It was preliminary platted
as Baldwin Park Addition. We have Cedar Springs to the east. Baldwin Park to the
north. And, then, we have Sienna Creek, which you will see, I believe, next week, to the
west. The final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat.
There are three fewer lots. They have shifted some micro-paths and a pathway was
added to the east side of the common lot connecting the park area to North Brice
Canyon Drive. So, there were also some issues and the staff report may have been a
little confusing. There were some issues regarding the amount of land dedicated for the
drain and canal, the Coleman Lateral. The applicant was able to negotiate a lesser right
of way for those two features. Because that area was not technically open space, it
would have been fenced, it would have not been usable open space, the reduction in
that easement width didn't affected their open space calculations and, therefore, staff
did feel that the final plat was in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary
plat. I do have an e-mail from the applicant's representative saying they are in
agreement with the conditions of approval and has no issues with the requirements at
this time.
De Weerd: Okay. Well, the applicant agrees with staff findings. Council, any
questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Okay. Do I have a motion?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we approve FP 04-069, final plat for Baldwin Park Subdivision No.
9.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item NO.9. Is there any further
discussion? Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 20 of 35
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 10:
FP 04-070 Request for Final Plat approval of 40 single-family residential
building lots and two common lots on 10.32 acres in an R-8 zone for
Roseleaf Subdivision No.2 by Liberty Development, Inc. - 3615 South
Locust Grove Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 10 is FP 04-070. Start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this final plat is for Roseleaf
Subdivision. It's on the west side of Locust Grove Road, south of -- south of Victory, I
believe. The Tuscany Village Subdivision is just to the north. They have done the -- or
final plat on phase one, which is to the west. The final plat is in substantial compliance
with the approved preliminary plat. They are asking for 44 single-family residential
building lots and two common area lots on 10.32 acres in an R-8 zone. The gross
density is 4.3 dwelling units per acre and the net density is 5.3 dwelling units per acre. I
was not able to locate a letter from the applicant stating that they were in agreement
with the conditions of approval. I'm hoping they have a representative here.
De Weerd: Is the application here this evening? Okay. Council, what would you like to
do?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Seeing that we don't have consensus from the applicant and we don't have
record of it, I move that we table Item No. 10 to November 23rd, 2004.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to table Item No. 10 to next week, November 11th --
November 23rd, 2004. 11/23.
Rountree: The way-back machine.
De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIES: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Okay. We are in the public process of our meeting. We are required by our
ordinance to swear in any of those that are desiring to provide public testimony. So, I
do it all at once and get it all out of the way. Anyone who would like to provide
testimony this evening, if you will, please, raise your right hand. Is the testimony that
you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you
God? If so, answer yes.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 21 of 35
(Affirmative answers.)
Item 11:
Continued Public Hearing from November 3, 2004: AZ 04-025
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 121.96 acres from R4 (Ada County)
to R-4 zone for Vienna Woods Subdivision No. 1-7 and Edinburgh
Place Subdivision No. 1-2 by the City of Meridian - NEC of East
McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road:
De Weerd: Okay. Item 11 is a continued Public Hearing from November 3 and I will
start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this item was tabled last time
because the hearing date was posted for a Tuesday, instead of the Wednesday. It was
right after the election, so that's why it's been tabled. We did not discuss this at your
last hearing. The item before you is the annexation of Vienna Woods and Edinburgh
Place Subdivision. They are currently in an R-4 district in the county and we are -- staff
has initiated the application to have them annexed and zoned R-4 in the City of
Meridian. The annexation is comprised of 362 build-able lots, 27 common lots, for a
total of 389 lots. Vienna Woods is located here at the north portion of this inverted L
and, then, Edinburgh is down here. We have McMillan Road along the south, Locust
Grove on the west. With the annexation of Settlement Bridge Subdivision located here
on the south side of McMillan Road, provided an annexation path to the Edinburgh and,
then, Vienna Woods through Edinburgh Subdivision. And also Sheridan Place, which is
located here to the west of Edinburgh Subdivision, provided an additional annexation
path to those properties. I'm going to largely read the next portion, because there are
very specific findings in the state code related to annexation of properties. These are
listed on page two toward the last two paragraphs on that page of the staff report. The
subject of this application is adjacent to the City of Meridian and lies within our area of
city impact of the City of Meridian. The entire property is included within the Meridian
Urban Service Planning Area, as defined in the 2002 Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
The land is laid off into lots and blocks containing not more than five acres of land each.
The city has prepared and published a written annexation plan that includes the manner
of providing tax supported municipal services to this land, the changes in taxation and
other costs which may result if the subject lands are annexed, the means of providing
fee supported municipal services to the lands proposed to be annexed, an analysis of
the potential effects of annexation upon other units of local government which currently
provide tax supported or fee supported services to the land and the proposed future
land use planning and zoning designations for the land. Because staff feels that we
have met these findings, we have recommended that the subject property be annexed
into the corporate limits of the City of Meridian and be zoned R-4, Low Density
Residential. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a hearing on this item on
October 7th, 2004. There were no members of the public to testify in favor or opposition
or commenting on this application. The Commission had no key items, issues of
discussion, nor any changes to staff recommendation. To staff's knowledge there are
no outstanding issues before the City Council. I do also want to add note that staff did
Meridian City Council
November 16,2004
Page 22 of 35
have a neighborhood meeting on this annexation request and we pretty much had a full
house. We held it here in Council chambers and it was pretty much full for that meeting
and we answered questions and I think we were able to satisfy a lot of people's
concerns regarding the annexation request and, hopefully, that was evidenced by the
Planning and -- no one showing up at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing.
And with that I will end staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Thank you, Anna. Are there any questions for staff at this time?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
Donnell: None.
De Weerd: Okay. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Well, I would like to give comment to Anna. The staff did a tremendous
job in the information that they got to the neighbors and I believe as this development --
as these developments were approved, the public notice on the plat and on the signings
with CC&Rs were very well notified that this would be the step taken once they were
contiguous and this really does emphasize and underscore how to do it right. We don't
want to do it, but we like to grow up like we are supposed to, but in this case it was done
very well and appreciate the staff efforts, in particular Craig Hood. He put together a
very nice analysis of impact to the neighbors on what would happen and it was an
outstanding job. So, thank you, Anna. Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we close the public hearings on AZ 04-025.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 11. All those in favor say
aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve AZ 04-025, Vienna Woods and Edinburgh annexation and
zoning.
Rountree: Second.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 23 of 35
De Weerd: The motion is to approve Item 11. Is there any further discussion?
Hearing done, Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 12:
Public Hearing: CUP 04-039 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
women's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherry
Crossinq Subdivision by Robnett Construction, Inc. - northwest corner
of Cherry Lane and Under Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 12 is a Public Hearing on CUP 04-039. I'll open the Public
Hearing with staff comments.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Before you begin staff comments, I am going to recuse myself from this
application, because of a personal conflict of interest.
De Weerd: Okay. Does Council have any problem with that?
Bird: Absolutely not.
Donnell: No.
Rountree: Not a bit.
De Weerd: See you later, Mr. Wardle. Okay. Staff.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for a Conditional
Use Permit for a woman's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 r of Cherry
Crossing Subdivision. The entirety of Cherry Crossing Subdivision is outlined here. It's
at the -- it's at the northwest corner of Under Road and Cherry Lane on the south side of
Emerald Falls Drive. So, this does provide a boundary to it to the north. I did want to
explain a little bit about fitness centers and their relationship to a listed use in the zoning
ordinance and, of course, there is no such listed use. In the past -- that would make my
life far too easy. In the past, such as for Gold's Gym, we classified it as kind of an
indoor entertainment use. It didn't seem appropriate with this scale of development.
With the really large athletic clubs it seemed like an appropriate fit, but for these small
ones it didn't seem like an appropriate fit at all. So, we are bringing it forward to you as
a use not listed, but as similar to other uses listed in the C-N zone and, therefore, it just
requires conditional use approval. So, that's why it's before you tonight. This is the site
as the aerial was taken. It has developed somewhat since then. This is the now Lot 1
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 24 of 35
that -- the original subdivision has gone through an number of lot line changes and splits
of properties and shuffling about, so -- but this is the lot as proposed currently. This is
the proposed building. And these are the elevations. I'm looking for the size of the
building, ma'am. I'm not finding it offhand. I'm sure the applicant will be able to let us
know what that is. Sixteen hundred square feet? Six thousand square feet. There we
go. The building is approximately 6,000 square feet. They would have, I believe, a
drainage basin at the north property line. As I mentioned before, there is drive -- a road
-- a public street just north of this and as you look, there are a number of residential lots
that were platted with this subdivision just to the north. The subject property lies right
here kind of just below this roundabout, so there would be some -- quite a bit of distance
to these properties immediately north of it. Part of the approval that they are asking for
is for operating hours to be between 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven days a week for the
property. The City Council has addressed the issue of time limits for the allowed hours
of operation on this general property. Most of that discussion was related to the -- what
was thought to be a Rite Aid, I believe, at the time and the hours of operation for that
use. This, because it is a fitness facility, they do need to open up a little earlier than
was originally anticipated for the subdivision and stay open a little bit later to
accommodate people's work schedules. So, they are asking for 6:00 a.m. to 10:00
p.m., seven days a week, just for this subject property. The Planning and Zoning
Commission conducted a hearing on October 21 st. Testifying in favor of the application
was Mike Robnett, representing Robnett Construction, and no one from the public
testified in opposition to the application. The Commission did not have a great amount
of discussion on the application and there was no changes to staff's initial
recommendation. So, to staff's knowledge there are no outstanding issues before the
City Council. And with that I will end staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Thank you, Anna. Any questions for staff at this time?
Rountree: I have none.
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Is the applicant here? Come forward. If you will, please, state your name
and address.
Robnett: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, my name is Mike Robnett and I
reside at 655 West Oakhampton. Anna pretty much summed it up well. I do want to
make a -- just a couple of clarifications. We did come forward to you guys a few weeks
ago with a miscellaneous app to amend the hours of operation from what Rite Aid had it
as, which was several different hours, depending on the day. And we have changed it
to 6:00 to 10:00, seven days a week. And that is on the whole parcel. This is going to
be one of two lots in the back and those hours of operation were amended on both
pieces and they will -- they will hold fast on the other piece as well, not just -- not just
Total Woman. When I started working with this property, I met with all the neighbors
and that seemed to be their biggest concern was getting something in there that's going
to run late into the night. The couple hours early in the morning didn't seem to be a
Meridian City Council
November 16,2004
Page 25 of 35
problem. We did design this site -- all the parking is in front. The building is between
the parking and the residents, so all your parking lot lighting and stuff will have the
building as a buffer. There is also a berm and fence and landscape buffer already in
place between the proposed building and the residential lots right now. And as Anna
also said, there is no use for this in the C-N zone -- or in the schedule of use control, but
the purpose of a C-N zone is to permit the establishment of small-scale convenience
business uses, which are intended to meet the daily needs of the residents of an
immediate neighborhood. And that pretty much is what the Total Woman Fitness is
doing here. We have a hundred and -- let me see here. Our parking ratio is one per
125 square feet, so we have well exceeded the required parking spaces, so I don't
anticipate any problems of parking on the neighborhood streets if the parking lot fills up.
We have plenty of adequate parking. And we have also -- the density on this has gone
down quite a bit from what was previously approved. We have about 20 percent less
building, even including the future development phases that we have planned. So, it's
going to be a neighborhood commercial center that's very functional and yet the impact
to the neighbors I think will be limited. So, with this I would ask that you would approve
the Conditional Use Permit for Total Woman Fitness and I'll answer any questions.
De Weerd: Can you tell me how high that berm is and with the fence and -- I assume
it's a six foot fence.
Robnett: I don't -- and the berm is probably four feet. And I don't -- I don't believe the
fence is right on top of the berm. And I apologize, we did not put that in and I don't have
cross sections of that. That was in before we put the land under contract.
De Weerd: Are those houses in already?
Robnett: There is about -- immediately behind it probably about 50 percent of them are
occupied and I met with the building contractor who is building all of the lots in that
subdivision and I have a signed letter from him on all of the empty lots saying that he
did not feel that our development would hinder his sales or cause any problems with his
residential development behind us.
De Weerd: Does he know that that back wall is just all brick and -- I mean it's solid, with
no variation? I guess a couple of doors.
Robnett: He has seen elevations, yes.
De Weerd: Okay.
Robnett: What was -- when I took this to Steve Hart -- and he's the building contractor
on those and the neighbors, what was previously approved was a 23,000 square foot
single user in the corner, which was a good four or five feet taller and a lot more -- it
was just a big block in the corner. We are kind of breaking it up with two or three
smaller buildings, setting them around there. You know, I think it will be a much more
pleasing look than what was previously approved.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 26 of 35
(
De Weerd: Okay. Council?
Bird: I have none.
Rountree: No questions.
Donnell: Nothing.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Robnett: Thank you.
De Weerd: Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Okay.
Donnell: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Donnell.
Donnell: I would move that we would close the Public Hearing on CUP 04-039.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 12. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT.
Donnell: And, Madam Mayor, I would move that we would approve a Conditional Use
Permit, CUP 04-039 for a woman's fitness center, even though I don't believe that that
meets recreational use in my view. That sounds like a workout. But for the Cherry
Crossing Subdivision.
Bird: Would that include the 6:00 to 10:00?
Donnell: Absolutely. And includes all staff recommendations.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 12. Is there any further discussion?
You know, I hate to see this go so easily and --
Canning: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 27 of 35
De Weerd: I think you need to put additional conditions and extra landscaping,
windows, maybe, because I saw there were bathrooms in the back. You could put
windows in there. Yes, Anna.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Council-member Bird asked for clarification from the maker of
the motion if it included hours of operation and I was in error. My skim reading was too
much skimming and not enough reading. The Council has already approved those. So,
those findings will not include the hours of operation, that's already been done. I just
wanted to clarify that.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Is there any further discussion? Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, absent; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 13:
Public Hearing: CUP 04-038 Request for a coffee shop with a drive-thru
window in a C-C zone for EI Dorado Subdivision. Lot 6. Block 5 by
W.H. Moore Company - north west corner of East Overland Road and
Bonito Way and west of South Eagle Road:
De Weerd: I was hoping to break a tie on this one. Okay. Item 13 is a Public Hearing
on CUP 04-038. I will open the Public Hearing on Item 13. And, for the record,
Councilman Wardle is back with us. Staff.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for a conditional use
approval of a drive-thru. The property is located at the intersection of Overland Road
and Bonito Way in the Bonito or EI Dorado Subdivision, as it's also called. This is the
site. This is the driveway coming through and, then, this is Bonito Way over here. The
drive-thru facility is part of a larger building, as you see. The drive-thru is located on the
west end. The folks will either come in through this driveway and make a U-turn and
come back up in this direction or if they are entering from Bonito, they will come through
and wind their way northward -- northwestward. The drive-thru coffee shop itself is
1,281 square feet. It is within a larger structure, as I mentioned, that comprises 18,855
square feet in a C-C zone. Restaurants, just for clarification, are permitted uses. It's
only the drive-thru that requires the Conditional Use Permit today. The applicant has
proposed a seven foot wide planter island west of the drive-thru lane to help separate
that traffic from the two way drive Jane traffic coming off of Overland Road and the drive-
thru lane should be able to stack three to four cars before idle vehicles would block any
traffic in this parking area. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended
approval of this application. They heard it -- the item on October 21 st. Jonathan Seel,
representing W.H. Moore Company, testified in favor of the application. No one from
the public testified in opposition. There was no significant discussion by the
Commission and no changes to staffs initial recommendation. To staffs knowledge
there are no outstanding issues before City Council. And with that I will end staffs
presentation.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 28 of 35
De Weerd: Thank you, Anna. Any questions for staff?
Bird; I have none.
Donnell: None.
De Weerd: Okay. The applicant?
Seel: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Councilmembers, Jonathan Seel, W.H. Moore
Company, 1940 Bonito, Meridian. We have read through the staff report, we are in
agreement with it, and unless there is any questions, I'll sit down.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Rountree: J have none.
De Weerd: Well, you really caught them on a good night.
Seel: We are on a roll tonight. I like this.
De Weerd: No. I guess I would have a question. Where is the drive-thru window, just-
- if it will accommodate three or four cars and stacking.
Seel: Yes. If I can -- it's approximately right there in that area.
De Weerd: Okay. And you think you won't have any affect into the drive aisle as you
come in off of Overland to try and make that U-turn around that island?
Bird: Right there?
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Seel: Madam Mayor, no, I don't anticipate. As I say, as a dimension, you have got two
options. One is here and this is probably the main entrance coming in, as you well
know, with the arches. So, most people will most likely come through this area. It's less
likely that you're going to see more people come through this area, but we don't
anticipate any problems.
De Weerd: Okay. I just had to make up something.
Seel: That's okay.
De Weerd: For lack of creativity of my Council.
Seel: We are trying to shorten it for you.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 29 of 35
De Weerd: Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Thank you.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we close the Public Hearing CUP 04-038.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 13. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: J move we approve CUP 04-038.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 13. Is there any further discussion?
Okay. Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 14:
Public Hearing: AZ 04-027 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.5
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Christian Familv Matters, Inc. by Don
Weber - east of South Under Road and south of West Overland Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 14 is Public Hearing AZ 04-027. I'll open the Public
Hearing with Anna's remarks.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for annexation and
zoning of 4.5 acres from RUT to the R-8 zone. About a year ago, October 7th, 2003,
the applicant Don Weber, came before us to request water service for the subject
property from the City of Meridian. They had gone through the Ada County conditional
use process to locate a church on the property and at the conclusion of that process
discovered that the requirements for fire flow were significant enough that they weren't
able to do it without getting water from the City of Meridian. So, they came to you at
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 30 of 35
(
that time and requested that water service. They also requested that they not be
required to annex at that time, because they were in the middle of completing the
conditional use process or meeting the conditions of approval, rather, for Ada County.
The Council said that they would provide -- allow water to be provided to the site, as
long as they filed an annexation request and came and told us when they were done
with Ada County. They willing did that and I think they had that application in the day
after we asked for it. We have been holding onto it for a while and they notified us that
they had completed all their conditions of approval with Ada County and we began to
process that annexation request. And that's why this is before you here today. The
staff report does talk about the comparison of the Ada County standards versus the City
of Meridian standards and at one point this property would be brought into compliance,
that the zoning ordinance does have specific language about when a -- kind of a -- it's
not really a nonconforming use, but where you have a parking lot that doesn't meet
landscaping standards -- current landscaping standards, there are provisions in there as
to how much of that parking lot can be resurfaced or redone before everything has to be
brought into compliance. So, staff anticipates that we would just treat this similar to any
other use that just had to meet different standards at the time it was constructed. There
was some discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing as to whether
the property should be required to hook up to city sewer when that service was
available, like if it went by the front of the lot would they be required, then, to hook into it
or at a later date when they wanted to further develop the property. The Planning and
Zoning Commission has recommended that -- that they not be required to enter into a
development agreement to hook up to that sanitary sewer service when it's available,
but that just it be at the request of the applicant when they want to do future
development of the property, that, then, they could hook up to sanitary sewer. The
Planning and Zoning Commission did conduct a hearing on October 21 st and they did
vote to recommend approval of this application. The applicant Don Weber testified in
favor. There was no one in opposition to the application. The key issues of discussion
were the prior Ada County actions on the property, specifically the CUP approval for a
church, the sewer master plan for this area and, then, as I stated before, whether or not
a development agreement should be required to address nonconforming parking lot. I
think that the issue was also raised about the sewer service. They did also make one
change to staff recommendation. They deleted site-specific paragraph regarding police
chief approval before City Council. I think that was placed in there, because we weren't
able to get police department comments, but he did have a chance to review it and staff
was comfortable -- or the Planning Commission recommended that that condition be
removed. With that I believe I will end staffs comments.
De Weerd: Okay. Any questions for Anna?
Bird: I have none.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
,-
[
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 31 of 35
Rountree: Anna, I had a question about your comments on landscaping.
Canning: Yes, sir.
Rountree: Just run through that again. This would be subject to all City of Meridian's
landscape requirements?
Canning: Not at this time. When they wanted to redevelop, we would look to what
extent they are adding onto the property and use the guidelines that are in the zoning
ordinance to bring that up to code. The applicant -- my recollection was he was pretty
clear when he came to ask for the water, that he -- he asked if he could be approved
with what Ada County had approved. He didn't want to have to kind of redo everything
once he got through the Ada County process. Had he known that he would have to
redo everything to come up to the City of Meridian process, he probably wouldn't -- he
probably would have just applied for a Conditional Use Permit and annexation at that
time. So, the commitment kind of was that go ahead and finish what you started with
Ada County, we will annex you kind of as is after that, but having said that, there is quite
a bit of property that's not being developed here, as you can see. There is quite a bit of
vacant property. I do believe the church plans to expand at some time as the
membership grows and they would be subject to conditional use approval at that time.
They are getting an R-8 zoning and there is a couple reasons for that. One is they do
have some members of the church living on the property at this time, so that was
compatible with that use and also it's designated as residential on the Comprehensive
Plan. So, that's why staff is recommending a residential zone, as opposed to a light
office zone, which would be a church is a principal permitted use and they could just
bypass the conditional use process. They will have to go through the conditional use
process to further develop the site. That was a very long answer, Mr. Rountree. I'm
sorry .
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Follow up. Conditional Use Permit would be required for any residential
development as well?
Canning: Not if it were -- either a plat or conditional use process would be required for
residential development, because there would be more than one use on the site. So, it
would have to go through a planned development to have additional principal permitted
structures on the site. Or it would have to go through the platting process.
Rountree: Follow up. That zoning designation goes with the land, not the applicant; is
that correct?
Canning: Correct.
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 32 of 35
De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions? Would the applicant like to provide
testimony? Were you sworn in?
Weber: Yes, I was.
De Weerd: Okay. Sorry. Dumb question. If you will please, state your name and
address.
Weber: My name is Don Weber and I live at 1525 South Callistoga Avenue in Meridian.
And as Anna explained in real great detail, really, why we are here tonight and that is
true that last October we came before you, because we were undertaking -- I should
say we were in the middle of our building project and completed our parking lot, our
landscape requirements with Ada County, and we found out that we did need water to
provide for the fire protection on the building, the assembly hall we were building. So,
you were kind enough to grant us that and with the agreement that we would annex and
Planning and Zoning was kind enough to be patient with us to finish up this summer and
get our certificate of occupancy and once we got that I gave them a call and said we
can now proceed forth with the annexation and the rezoning. So, that brought us here
tonight, so I would be willing to answer any questions if you have any.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: No? You picked a good night. Okay.
Weber; Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Okay. Seeing none, Council, what would you like to do?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I'd like to close the Public Hearing on AZ 04-027.
Donnell: I second it.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item
14. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 33 of 35
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: A point of discussion. You know, there is a soft spot in all of our hearts for
these kinds of applications, but this one has an awful lot of loopholes in it and in my
mind if we were to approve this, we would be, I think, neglect and not fair to a whole lot
of other applicants that have come to the City of Meridian, not requiring meeting city
standards. I wasn't on the Council when this was previously submitted and approved,
so I'll qualify that. I'm also concerned with the R-8 zoning, that if the church is not
successful at some point in time in the future, we have this little R-8 enclave out there.
I'm also concerned that there is resistance to connect to the sewer when it's available.
Just a lot of things about this particular application don't settle well with me and I would
have to vote in opposition to this.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Rountree. Any other information needed or
discussion? I would entertain a motion.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I would move that we approve Item No. 14, AZ 04-027.
Bird: I will second it.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 14. Is there any discussion? Okay.
Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, nay; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE NAY.
Item 15:
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Item 15 is the water, sewer, and trash delinquencies.
This is to inform you in writing, if you so choose, that you have the right to a pre-
termination hearing at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, November 16th, 2004, before the Mayor and
City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made
by this city that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel.
Your service will be discontinued on November 17th, 2004, unless payment is received
in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer, and trash
delinquency? Seeing no one here, they are hereby informed that they may appeal and
have the decision of the city reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court pursuant to
Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of
the turn-off list is one -- I believe it is one thousand -- or 113,000 dollars.
Rountree: Close enough.
Meridian City Council
November 16. 2004
Page 34 of 35
De Weerd: Yes. Something like that. 113,140.90. Okay. Council, now that I have
stumbled through that one, do I have a motion?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I move that we approve the delinquency turn off for November 17th in the
amount of $113,140.90.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Is there any further discussion?
Rountree: Or however the Mayor said that.
De Weerd: Don't ask me to even repeat it either. Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 16:
Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67R2345 (1)(f):
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 16 is an Executive Session per Idaho State Code.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1 )(f).
Donnell: I second it.
De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:32 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
(
Meridian City Council
November 16, 2004
Page 35 of 35
III 2tJ I of'
DATE APPROVED
ATTEST:
November 12,2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
4
REQUEST Discussion of Storm Water Retention Ponds - Maintenance and Landscape Issues
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SmLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
(
Will Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gary lnselman [Ginselman@achd.ada.id.us]
Monday, November 15,20043:58 PM
bergw@meridiancity.org
Re: FW: slides from Tuesday
Landscaping memo
Meridian 11-1...
Will,
Attached is a memo from our Engineering Dept to the ACHD Commission
about the storm drain pond item on the agenda for Tuesdays joint
meeting. Could you please forward this to the Mayor and Council?
Thanks,
Gary.
1
WiII Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Will Berg
Monday, November 15. 2004 4:50 PM
Christine Donnell (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E~
mail); Tammy de Weerd
Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-mail); Anna
Canning (E~mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail); Doug Strong (E-mail)
FW: FW: slides from Tuesday
Cc:
Subject:
Landscaping memo
Meridian 11-1...
Attached is information from the ACHD staff for the joint meeting with the
ACHD Commissioners on Tuesday, November 16th at 5:30 pm. Thanks. . . Will
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Inselman [mailto:Ginselman@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:58 PM
To: bergw@meridiancity.org
Subject: Re: FW: slides from Tuesday
Will,
Attached is a memo from our Engineering Dept to the ACHD Commission
about the storm drain pond item on the agenda for Tuesdays joint
meeting. Could you please forward this to the Mayor and Council?
Thanks,
Gary.
1
North Meridian Area Plan
... ACHD Capital Improvement Plan
. Will begin update in about one year.
. Update to reflect better demographics.
. Intersections receive higher priority.
,~Pl.lsh off need for additional Janes for many
, /1! years.
,.' SideVi'alks in easements not ROW.
i?d' ..'
~~pevelopment Review
'"{~)ntersection analysis and ranking.
· Warrant regarding signalization.
Stormwater Drainage
.... MOU for Plan Design
· Street buffer:
.. Full width
..One tree per 35 feet
.......Low maintenance ground caver
Internal:
-"Vegetated-ary land grasses
~9ne tree per 8,000 square feet
Stormwater drainage pond standards.
..Slopes less than 3: 1
tr above, then no land use buffer required.
Stormwater Drainage
.... MOU for Maintenance
· City to agree on low maintenance plan
. Parks Department to maintain
1
~~~?t~~
A<]I~ Ada County Highway District
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
Design & Survey
To:
From:
Subject:
November 15, 2004
ACHD Commissioners
L. Kent Brown, P.E.
Manager of Engineeri ng
Project Landscaping
This memo provides information on those projects where landscaping was installed as part of the roadway
improvements and what agreements we have for maintaining the landscaping. The highlighted projects had
pond sites involved.
Boise -
Boise -
Boise -
Boise -
Boise -
Boise -
Boise -
Capitol Boulevard - University to Vista
This project was built with Federal Funding with the City of Boise responsible for all of the
landscape maintenance along the project.
Federal Way - Vista south to the New York Canal
This project was built with Federal Funding with the City of Boise responsible for maintenance
of all street lighting and I andscaping within the limits of the roadway. ACHD is responsible for
the maintenance of the storm drain facilities which included the detention ponds.
Approximately, five separate pond sites were built along the project limits. None of the pond
sites were landscaped.
Vista Avenue - Tarqee to Cherry Lane
Median Islands were installed with landscaping and was built with a combination of Federal
and local funding. Boise City is responsible for all landscape maintenance.
West ParkCenter River CrossinQ - Boise River to Broadwav
This project was built with local funding with the City of Boise agreeing to be responsible for all
landscape maintenance along the roadway with the following exception: the MK Plaza Group
is responsible for landscape maintenance along their property from the southerly edge of the
sidewalk to their property line.
15th Street - Ada to ResseQuie
Landscape medians were installed with local funding with the Neighborhood Association being
responsible for the landscape maintenance.
Five Mile Road Extension - Treeline to Chinden
This project was built using local funding with the City of Boise responsible for maintenance of
aH of the trees.
Curtis Road, Fairview to Mountain View
This project was built with local funding with the City of Boise responsible for maintenance of
the street lights and landscaping.
Garden City - Curtis Road - Mountain View to Chinden
Ustick Road - Curtis to Mountain View
This project was built with local funding with the City of Garden City being responsible for the
maintenance of the landscaping including the pathway along the detention pond . No
maintenance is done in the pond area as this is being established as a wetlands area.
Eagle ~
Eaqle Road - Eaqle BVwPass north to Floatinq Feather
This project was built with local funding with the City of Eagle participating in the cost to install
the street lights and landscaping. T he City of Eagle is responsible for the maintenance of the
street lighting and landscaping.
Kuna -
School Street - Deer Flat to Boise Street
This project was built in two phases with local funds. Two separate pond sites were built, one
just south of School Street and Boise Avenue and one in the southwest c orner of Deer Flat
and Under. The City of Kuna is maintaining both sites.
Star -
Star Road - State Street to Floatinq Feather
We built two ponds; water was stubbed out but no landscaping was done because the City of
Star was not prepared to maintain the landscaping.
In aU of the projects cited with the exception of Capitol Boulevard and 15th Street, there were many meetings
on the type of landscaping to be installed before final agreement was achieved and the work was completed.
On Capitol Boulevard, the City of Boise has been maintaining this area since approximately 1983. On 15th
Street, our Traffic Department stated that they negotiated the agreement for landscape maintenance with the
Neighborhood Association.
c: Director
Mayor and City Council of Meridian
Dale Kuperus, P.E.
Bruce Mills, P.E.
Gary Inselman
Steve Spickelmier
Steven Price
Central & Chron Files
November 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
5-B
REQUEST License Agreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension Project
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SmLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
~vP
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shaJl become property of the City of Meridian.
City of Meridian
Public Works Dept.
t"t
~
k~
-8
Memo
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
To: Will Berg; Tara Green
From: Clint Dolsby, Staff Engineer
cc: Brad Watson, Public Works Director
Date: 11/08/2004
Re: Proposed Agenda Item for November 16,2004 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
November 16 City Council agenda, under Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
License Agreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension Proiect. A request for license
agreement with the Settlers Irrigation District for the four locations where the waterline will be
crossing a Settlers Irrigation District facilfty has been received by the Public Works
Department. This license agreement with a $150 filing fee is necessary in order to construct
the McMillan Water Extension Project:
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approves the License Agreement for the four locations where
the waterline will be crossing a Settlers Irrigation District facility and authorize
the Mayor to sign it.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 1
CROSSING AGREEMENT
This Crossing Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into and made effective this
day of
, 200_, by and between SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
("DistricC), an irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue ofthe laws of the
State ofIdaho, whose address is Post Office Box 7571, Boise, Idaho 83707, and City of
_ Meridian, an Incorporated City in good standing in the State of Idaho, whose address is City of
Meridian Public Works Department, 660 Watertower Lane, Suite 200, Meridian Idaho 83642
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the District owns and maintains a system of canals, laterals and
drains, including Lemp Canal, for purposes of delivering and removing irrigation water to and
from its landowners, together with easements to convey water in such canals, laterals, drains;
easements for ingress and egress; and for the operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of
the canals, laterals, and drains;
WHEREAS, the Licensee desires to obtain a license (<<License") from the District
for the installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of Meridian and McMillan
Water Main Extension ("Water Main"), as described below:
(a) The Water Main will cross over Lemp Canal District facilities, on the Southern
side of Section 30, at the Intersection of Meridian and McMillan Roads, two points along
McMillan, and at the Intersection of Locust Grove and McMillan Roads, in Township 4 North,
. Range 1 East, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as described in Exhibit AI, A2, A3, and A4 attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
B01_MT1:372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 1
112001 1200
WHEREAS, the District desires to grant the License to the Licensee for purposes
of constructing, operating, inspecting, maintaining, and repairing said Water Main;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be received by
the District and the Licensee, and other good and valuable consideration, which consideration is
hereby aclrnowledged by the parties, and the promises, covenants, agreements, and conditions
hereinafter set forth, the parties agree with one another as follows:
1. Grant of License. The District hereby grants a license ("License") to the
Licensee for the purpose of crossing over Lemp Canal at the location described in Exhibit A, in
order to install, operate, inspect, maintain, and repair said Water Main, provided that said Water
Main is installed as depicted in the -plans, maps, drawings and notes attached as Exhibit B. The
License is subject to the restriction that no construction may begin on the Water Main until the
effective date of this Agreement and must be completed prior to April 1, 2005.
This grant ofthe License is subject and subordinate to any and all property rights
the District may have in Lemp Canal.
The Licensee expressly aclmowledges and agrees that this License does not grant
the Licensee the right to install any property or equipment, except as may be described in this
Agreement, or the right to impair any rights of the District or others in the use ofthe Lemp
Canal. This grant of License is expressly conditioned upon the prior receipt by the Licensee of
any and all necessary approvals from governmental entities and private parties for its activities to
be performed under the terms of this Agreement, and is further expressly conditioned upon the
District's prior written approval of all drawings and plans concerning the activities to be
conducted by the Licensee under this Agreement.
B01_MT1:372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 2
112001 1200
2. Term of Grant of License. The term of the License shall commence upon
the effective date of this Agreement and shall continue for so long as the Licensee is in
compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The District reserves the right to revoke this
License, effective upon written notice to the Licensee thereof should the Licensee at any time fail
to comply with the terms of this Agreement.
3. Installation. Inspection. Maintenance, and Repair of the Water Main.
The Licensee, following execution of this Agreement by the parties, and after November 1, 2004,
may commence construction of the Water Main crossing as described in Exhibits A and B and
may conduct operations, inspections, maintenance, and repair activities, at the Licensee's sole
cost and expense, as may be reasonably necessary, subj ect to any restrictions imposed on the
Licensee's activities as maybe set forth in this Agreement. The Licensee, or its agents or
contractors, shall perform all work contemplated by the terms ofthis Agreement in a
worlananlike manner. The Licensee agrees to assume all responsibility, including general
liability and costs for the construction, operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair ofthe
Water Main.
Any construction or other activities by the Licensee which may impede or impair
the flow of water through Lemp Canal may only be performed during the non-irrigation season,
which is usually between November 1 and March 15. The Licensee expressly acknowledges that,
notwithstanding the Licensee's assumption of certain responsibilities and receipt of certain rights
under this Agreement, the District does not relinquish its ownership rights in any portion of
Lemp Canal.
BOLMT1:372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 3
112001 1200
4. Representations and Warranties.
(a) District. The District represents and warrants that: (i) the District is an
irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws ofthe State ofIdaho;
(ii) the District has the capacity to enter into and perform the District's obligations under this
Agreement; (iii) all organizational and other actions required to authorize the District to enter
into and perform this Agreement have been properly taken; and (iv) this Agreement has been
properly executed and delivered by the District and is valid and binding upon the District in
accordance with its terms.
(b) Licensee. The Licensee represents and warrants that: (1) it is a
Incorporated City organized and in good standing in the State of Idaho; (ii) it has the capacity to
enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement; (iii) all actions required to authorize
the Licensee to enter into and perform this Agreement have been properly taken; (iv) this
Agreement has been properly executed and delivered by the Licensee and is valid and binding
upon the Licensee in accordance with its terms; and (v) it has obtained all permits, licenses, and
acknowledgments required to conduct the activities to be performed under the terms of the
Agreement.
5. Indemnitv. The Licensee agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold
the District and its officers, directors, employees, members, and agents harmless from and
against any and all liability, suits, losses, damages, claims, actions, costs, and expenses of any
nature, including court costs and attorney fees, arising from or out of any acts or omissions of the
Licensee, its agents, or contractors related to or in connection with its activities under this
Agreement and the exercise of any privileges or performance of any obligations by the Licensee
BOtMT1 :372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 4
112001 1200
hereunder. Furthermore, the Licensee agrees to protect, indemnify, and hold the District and its
officers, directors, employees, members, and agents harmless from and against any and all
liability, suits, losses, damages, claims, actions, costs, and expenses of any nature, including
court costs and attorney fees, arising from or out of water quality violations, flooding, or any
interruption or interference with the flow of water in Lemp Canal caused by any act or omission
ofthe Licensee or its agents.
6. No Liens. The Licensee shall allow no liens as a result of any labor
performed or materials supplied in connection with the activities ofthe Licensee, its agents, or
contractors, to attach to Lemp Canal or to any adjacent lands held by the District.
7. Binding Agreement. The promises, covenants, conditions, and agreements
herein contained shall be binding on each ofthe parties hereto and on all parties and all persons
claiming under them or any of them; and the rights and obligations hereof shall inure to the
benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
8. Further Consideration. In further consideration for inducing the District to
grant this License, the Licensee agrees to promptly pay all legal expenses incurred by the District
relating to the negotiation, preparation, and execution of this Agreement.
9. No Waiver. The failure of a party to insist on the strict performance of any
provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right or remedy upon a breach hereof shall not
constitute a waiver of any provision of this Agreement or limit such party's right to enforce any
provision or exercise any right.
10. Limitations on Liability. The parties hereto agree that nothing herein
contained shall be construed to create ajoint venture, partnership, or other similar relationship
BOI_MT1:372344.1
CROSSING AGREEl\1ENT - 5
112001 1200
which might subject any party to liability for the debts and/or obligations of the others, except as
otherwise expressly agreed in this Agreement.
11. Interpretation. The validity, meaning, and effect ofthis Agreement shall
be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho.
12. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be
given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between
the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter ofthis Agreement. Amendments to this
Agreement shall be made only by written instrument executed by each of the parties hereto.
14. Attorney Fees. In the event of any suit or proceeding by either party herein
against the other party arising out of this Agreement or in connection with the activities ofthe
Licensee, or their agents or contractors, under this Agreement, the nonprevailing party in such
suit or proceeding shall pay to the prevailing party such sum or sums as the court shall adjudge
reasonable for attorney fees and costs, including such fees and costs on appeal.
15. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded at the Ada County
Recorder's Office.
16. Notices. All notices permitted or required to be given under the terms of
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed effective upon receipt if sent by first class
mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective party hereto as follows of at such other
address as a party designates in writing.
BOLMTl :372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 6
112001 1200
Settlers Irrigation District
Post Office Box 7571
Boise, Idaho 83707
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the
date first set forth above.
Attest:
Vicki Keen, Secretary
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 7
112001 1200
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
By
, President of its
Board of Directors
[COMPANY]
By
, Authorized Agent for
BOLMT1:372344.1
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Ada)
On this day of _, 2004, before me, the undersigned notary public in
and for said state, personally appeared , President of the Board of
Directors of Settlers Irrigation District, an irrigation district organized and existing under and by
virtue of the laws of the State ofIdaho, lrnown or identified to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he has the authority to
execute and executed the same for the purposes therein contained on behalf of Settlers Irrigation
District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at
My Commission Expires
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss.
County of Ada)
On this _ day of , ~004, before me, the undersigned notary)ublic in
and for said state, personally appeared VICKI KEEN, Secretary of Settlers Irrigation District, an
irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State ofIdaho,
knO\VIl or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and aclrnowledged to me that she has the authority to execute and executed the same for the
purposes therein contained on behalf of Settlers Irrigation District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at
My Commission Expires
BOI_MT1 :372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 8
112001 1200
STATEOFIDAHO )
) ss.
County of Ada)
On this day of , 2004, before me, the undersigned notary public in
and for said state, personally appeared , authorized agent of
, lrnown or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument, and aclrnowledged to me that he has the authority to execute and
executed the same for the purposes therein contained on behalf of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at
My Commission Expires
BOLMT1;372344.1
CROSSING AGREEMENT - 9
112001 1200
EXHIBIT At
Legal Description of the Lemp Canal Culvert Crossing
This Permanent Water Main is situated at the Southwestern most comer of the SW ~ of Section
30 and the Northwestern most corner of the NW ~ of Section 31, at the intersection of Meridian
and McMillan Roads, in Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho.
Commencing at the station 53+ 16.54; thence North 10.87 feet more ofless to the station
53+27.41 of the Northerly stationing line according to the plan drawings for Project KA No.
104049, City of Meridian Water Main Extension (page #4).
EXHIBIT A2
Legal Description ofLemp Canal Tributary Crossing
This Permanent Water Main is situated along the Southern most edge of Section 30, paralleling
McMillan Road, in Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho.
Located at station 114+19.81 along the Easterly stationing line according to the plan drawings for
Project KA No.1 04049, City of Meridian Water Main Extension (page #7).
EXHIBIT A3
Legal Description of Lemp Canal Tributary Crossing
This Permanent Water Main is situated along the Southern most edge of Section 30, paralleling
McMillan Road, in Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho.
Located at station 130+93.12 along the Easterly stationing line according to the plan drawings for
Project KA No. 104049, City of Meridian Water Main Extension (page #8).
EXHIBIT A4
Legal Description of the Lemp Canal Culvert Crossing
This Permanent Water Main is situated at the Southeastern most corner of the SE % of Section
30, at the intersection of Locust Grove and McMillan Roads, in Township 4 North, Range 1 East,
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho.
Commencing at the station 150+ 15.66; thence East 14.58 feet more ofless to the station
150+30.24 of the Easterly stationing line according to the plan drawings for Project KA No.
104049, City of Meridian Water Main Extension (page # 11).
BOLMT1:372344.1
EXHIBIT B
CJ
r-
r--J
OJ
H
T
)<
uJ
~ ~
PL 0
4if.I, )!;ill
~ 11
N ~
Dr ~
A ~
N! ~
~ P.1Ql
. ~
II ~
&,iifr ~
,~D ~
~
. .
4) .
~
~ J
~o ~
Iii' fiiiJ
AiiiJ ~
~" ~
J! ;1-J
",iiii
-0
''''':
I ~o
~~
'~9
~~
~ '~
U ~
l:r- ~
(
""
::
fh1
.
~
I!iiI
.Fi1
-.
-.iI
'iI
tiJ
~
~
a\
..,.
o
'O:'f'
o
.-I
o
Z
.(
~
..,
"'...
~~
",:;l
.;O~
::>-~
"'Z<-:'
~Q=
:0--"
~~~
Ea~
,;;;
j::",
6~
. -
,-0
, -0 C)
~ FiI
"'0 fi)
P.-Il 1/
a ~
Etl
Jiill t<~
I'
~ lO r.q]
. fdf
~'n
I ~
'-'~ ED
,~o ~l
. D
. ~
=il
0 r
',-0
~
~1 '10
~
~I ..
~
Itl ~
FiH ~
r~ E
.
'- -n ! .
IfiiIl 0
~~ ~
~
0 0
IH 0
.
~iiiii:~ .
,-0.. 0
0
~ ~
;:;
~~ .
~
~i5 0
51;- .
:f! b
~
0,",
O~ .
~l .
~" 0
~. 0
.l!:1 "
- . ~~
;5=
"i'iii :;>0
)s~
" . ......
~l :!
~ ~
00
o~ ]i
s~
. . o.
. .
~~ ~i
1:~
0 ~~
= 0
0
~ ~ E:
~.E
~ !j 3n-
u_
~ ,,~ :i
.D
-.
~
~
0..;
~
~
~
j::;
IS
o
-..1
~h
<.ojl;.)
o~
~d:
~g::
.:J.;
f:'?
{)
;::
z
o
{)
>-
I-
:J
i=
::;)
. ~ ~ 8 " ~ ~ l! I
~ :;: ~ 2' ~
~ i !l. i l i i ~
~ [ [ t 8 &
~ '" '" '" ~
~ ~ 'S ~ ~
~ 8 ~ ~ > w ~ !
~ ~ J< w ~ ~ ~ ~
" ;;; t ~ ~ ~ "",
" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi~
~ g 8 ,,~
;! " li::
;; g ~
.. ~ ~
~ I ~ "
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . '" ~ ~
5 ~ ~ 0 ~ !:l ~
~ I: I: 5 li
<l ;:; ;:; ~
Cl
Z
UJ
I3l
ill
--1
~
fh1 <
I;) ~
t,,- ~ o:t 0'\
.., ,.-"':1 ~1 ~ 0 o:t
, '-0 0 0
. ~g ~ "1'
.~~ .i!ifJ 0 0
~ l"'l
~< ~ (f'l 0
~il ~ ...
<t.I Z ~
, rJ'J. ::
'i ,,~ ell <
~ jn Z ::I ~ ~
~ -< <
~ ~ -...:;
s ~ h
~ ~
~
.. .~ .
D< "
eO ...
.O' ]~~ ;; ~ . < ~
~~ ~5 .0
~o l~ ..~~ ~~ <
,g .. .
~] ~. :g,sE
'::::2 _ 0 ~"i~ j ;~i <
. 10 -;;- ..- C .P
~ c< ~~ ~il f~ ~ :s:.e "i
8,'
< ~i .~ . 1i~ ~~ ~5V Q~ '"
~ .....~ ~ o. i~~ =<"..!! .~ ~~ !
<.. " 1;- . . :
. 'i.u l~~ -0
~ o~ ~~~ i~: . =So!. l~j ~
, g ~f
" ~~ o.W i .~ e'I:JCi, .
D1 t! .~~ ~- :2~ ~!!~ ~
5 ... 5~f ~:~ :1~ ~i. .
E~ ~ ~~ :5.s:"lC i1 :Zf in
. " -E" ~~~ ~-'): .sl;s &~ .
.~ o . :l~ . .' ~~
< o~ ~'ij; illS!=!' g :::~ ~]~ .'
i-: ." ~o
j-i ~-; ~ ~~] ..~ ."
i i;i 1;-.. ~ -"
i~~ W, 5~~ o. .....
8: ~_ c: ~~a 0 ~5 G.t .:1 I"i,:
'0' :]'~ - , ;5i 5. ~:
~~ ~lt' E... "'u~ ~~ .D ti~ f:s oS "U.5!
. ;:;1,,11:" ::S~ ~l ou
~ ..:Eli: E~ . . . ~iiQ 11 ~~. ..
"D ~~ rr ~5 .s~ ii1 ..E "D~
~ EQ~ ~ .2
~'a c~t2' tBi ~=:;. -~ ~
'e;i C-~IU :- if!go ~~ .::= . ,
.. t~ .., .~ ~~ 5"
. :5~! ,'. g.~~ ~i ~j! ~t~ i! il
- ,=",:3
~i ~.g ;s. .0. l.! 00 1'& 00
] ~~~ .0. <. .PO:
i~! . " CI :-..~ e~'6 .-
:5 .;o.! i! ~c 5: .0. e ~ . . .g-
~~ ~~i if! ,cD'i:. .!::!...
~i~ ~cg- . . .;;; 0 ~~
~. .....!!- . .
0 o. ~~
.. " Eu: ~1 .5:::7; 1.:g~ . .
:'" :::!:!~ .V ~e
.;; ~~! ~:;,~ :!,""1iI ~ : ~~
~ . -.;"1 ~~~ -.;8'f; Hi 'j ~
Ob ~.o g ~! o..;~ 1i= ~
~. t;~ ~:;~ ~~~ ~~ ...,
~'c ~7;:5 ~.. H .~ n ""
.0 a._~ :5~~ c.!' 0:> tj8 ~g E..
..:.:;: es:~ iI~ i~
'6~ . u. ~~f
::5,gg "'~II'J. ~. ~~lJ o~
:~? . . tl~
0 ~5l if~ 00. ;::e- ]~
]'g H~ 5. "u~
, . i~~ ~-- '0" ~-~ .~
.. .- r]:2 1": ]~j 0-
~; ;~~ ~~ 1-] 0"
> 0 rs ~! ~..
:a'1i. ~. ~~~ E~: ~~ ;~
it:s ~"'fi~ t:~ ~-
is f~ ~ e;! ;i~ 0" ~:S~ ill, <0 .~
~e ~l) ~lt t!i .!l.>.P :!1 o~ .'
-0' _~8e ~~ :::1: o~ .!Od o.
ii o~:: ~-i ]~ 00_ ,g:a ~~~ i~
'=0 .:;~ -[;]: ~~
<'JE ~i! l€li jug' 85 ~t~~
.~ 1;l~E" ": z".1:0'l- .~
~..!:!--; .:: vii ~-a; :1 r 0 U',;~ e :;<'J = o~o
"t. :Z",,:E "=E ~ {j .~ :z!
n.5 .;~-'i -i -S E .o~ii ~~~ G'l1,2 ~~8~ ::~ i ~l; NO
.0
~.
~<l
~B
~"J!~
:5~8
~~~~
!E~~g
~~~t;
:\o"~
W ll:: 1lJ.2 2:
g~~ ~; ~
~~~ ~~ ~
~~....~ ~~w~
too!!:! W:;l;;:: 'iiL t;
2i it, :;;,,; i ~ ~
ei'J~ a~!::w >5
i:; ffi ~ taCS fl..... t;; ~ ~ ...
~~a5s~g~~Q.:t:~
i!lh ~i.!5~g~h ~
wllr.ai3J~Ii.Il..II..Wll,lO
I ! 1] !ili~1 N II j II!
~>I'I ~g~ .::
11 i ti It III
Ii I 1 II I II
~
~s
~ ~'
~::s
ti~
t~
...
"'"
.....
,.Q
'tl
~
""
=
Q.
~
""
~
~I
~I
JJ
..
i;:~:: t
\\'&99
!
~
o
1>
~
.r
f~
~~
~{
i~
::-~
~~
o~
B~
Ii
0.'
~;
~ .
!~
~E
5~
~f
~8
~~
): Oi
~!
'Q
.
.
ii ~
.!.&I :.
u. <
m ~ ~
e= go
~~ I
.~~ -
E] .:!
!i i.'
~! :
ii .:
; ~ ~
~~ CI
~
~
~ ~
~ 2
!l!i~n
~~~~~1!1~
~~g::i~~:g;q=
:;~g~~~5;'"
i~~nnlii
Q
Iii~~ Q
O:lU1 i
~~~ ..5;
In~~....<!:.'!
~a;:oo""l:I:
i3=~t;-~~
~ga-S~tg
~
~ ~
-r
L~
a ~ !!
Q W *
n=
~H
.
.
:+ ~ !i! ~ ~ r; I
.. [J 0&1 T: 0
1 D6ut 0-
: ~~
. ~o
:::if:::
"<l QU
~ ~t:l
~ ~~
~~ Cl~ _I-;
~<; t::::2; <;~<
-.: '0:: 2::s ~ ~ :=l;!
~~ "'" ~::::..: 5",;:;:
!-l~ E3~ ....Cl -
:;::: :;:: ,,'" ~ t::; ",6~
..",<; '-'f',l <>~,,-~
"l~ ~~Cl s~ ~E-.~~i
~O~~~~~t:::~~~~~~ ~~~~;
~~8~~~~~3~~~~~~"l~3~~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~Cl~O-~~
~9~"'~~~"'::;;:::;;:~::;;:::;;:::;;:u~u<;5
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~<;<;<;<;<;<;<;~<;<;<;~~~~
8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-'~"1'q-II!)\Ot"--..O;:)o.(;::),....".
cc:::.~~c:so~t::lt;:)"""t.........,
......''''''-IN. . . 1 I I . I . I . I
6qQ~~~~~~~~~~~~
t'
E
"l
~
ES
~
~
[:::
ES
"l
g~
Q~
h
t-:a ... ~<
;:;:gi~!d.
i.ft]is;1 ~
:: i ~ ~ ';~j: ;
i~~~;!:; ~
:i;Q~]~~~
~ ~~;:~~~ ~
~~~iI1~~ j
~a~~~;i ~
!~ii!;~; ~
mml! :
~~~:i~~~:
ff~~~~!~
:: "13 ~ c;.. C' Cl :;:
HHHH
;""uQ_o8.u
~!!~~;:i
~i;i5~~~
~:~;;]~~
m',lfi
T...._:J" iI":I;;; ~u
.~
~.::
.!
~;
.-
1~
i ~
a.
<-
!:.
~~
.. ,
~~
1
. .
0&
~:
if
i~
00
.,g
~:
1~
0..
~~
-.
;~~
:~E
~ :~
..,"'.
o
o
o
~
~
:i
!
~
o
.
5
E
..
~
..
~
;;
~~ ~
~;: i
1:go ....
.;'}: ..c
oe
Zo
1i
".
;~
~o
"
~.!
~-
~=
D
o
~
~
..
'D'i'
.~
i~
;!
.~
.-
:~
o .
-<l'"
~'r
",0
:::1l
:~
~t
il
~~
3 ~
-.
. >
~~
" .
:.$=
~.
-.
i;
~c
~]
!~
N.
-.!
D.
~i
i~
l~
~l
":
00
~=
D"
li:i
.l! ·
n
.
if
~
.
~
!
~
o
i
.
u
i
~
Q
-o~
-2' ~~
HI
~!i
Hi
s~~
li.:H
...;I!IO
2 S
]
~ :~
...
f~
<'J .
...
;:~
.....
~ :l
;; D
~~
;S:~ ~
e
'"
~
E
~
o
~
i
;;;
~
N
~
ii
'ij
1
i
.
.
D
C
1!
o
1
~
f
D
o
1!
D~
11
~;
~~
~o
~~
!i
~~
~~
D'"
~~
~u
c,!!
..
.!
t
..
D
~
~
~
D
~
.
.
."
!!
"0
ii
~I
"
~"
.~
*~
;~
i
-.
1
.::
~
o
-
:
"
1l
.-'
,c~ .3
;:;! ~
!
iirf;mly I
t:.~a ;:.~
"fi .
h ,!. ~
~h! I ~~ L
n~ . "!
i~.. i~"~ n~
~~ ot ..~
U~ ~- ~~ n.
~l; !il f
. , ~
- .
t
-2
'~B
gh
hli.
m
~~~g
~~t~
~i~~
i=ii
~il!
"Ii .
~~J
ilm~
g:;f~e
i
!
~
b
~
I.
"$
"-
'i
~-
~i
:~
~i
~.
h
:b
gol
lill
-h
'~i
b=
;~~
~i~
HJ.~
g~i)!
i~H
j%~!
-="p
m~~
~I~H
ih~.
ii!H
=u=~
~~!I!!
gi~.
~~~.
"il
'~<~i
mi~
~~.~.
~..~~.
;i-"
~5i;!
~
Ilfl
"~
h
:o~
!!~
~ij
.~;i
~h:
"'!;! t: ..
0:( Wl .-
u.c QIol -51
~~ ~;p ~
o~ ~:~
Ow 0 ~~f i
~~ ; o~~ i
~~ t ~r ~
Wu [
"'~ ~ Ii: "0 ~
o WI
\.l.. _ c~ u!
~~ ~tH~
00 o:"~
li!ffi ~~" i
<::E o.i
~5 ::;!!I
:;;5 ~I
Q ~ ... ~
gj:c a m~ :1"..-
"""9 a c:!.. ~ i
~~~ ~i! H
~o:t D'.:..~
li!~ H~( ~
<.... III t).::!i ...
~(j i :J1J' d!
~~ ~~; ~ g
U i( n. ~ OJ
~ e 5
I- K
::r:::2.J n. :if ~
2~~ g:t ~i
:i~~~~!H
1;;_ 0 _!.
CO ~ -c~
~~ ~ ~il' ~
<~ ~ "i .
~~~g~~ ~
~?:~~I ~
<.> n.
~~
~.
"~
h
~~l
il..
I/O
(
~i
t~
i:
- ~~
H~
i i~~
~ .g.
o "=i
~ ~~;
i .;~
GEl
a:O ~
2~ g:~ !"
~~ ~ ~iH ~
oQ ~ It..:!
affi ~ ~h Ii
~~ i o;i ~
~o :J~i ~
i ~j;; ~I ~
f ~ <.> n. h
\
~
II
"j
1
t!
k- ~r.
s! ~~
<. ~i
~~ ~
ih \
~n
",0 ~ t: I
2! 0 g:= ~"
:! .~ .,-~ H
~~ ~ i~i
~ffi ~ ~if ii
<~:: 0= 5
~~ ~ :i! !
~;; g ~I 5
(j ~ g. ! i
~
2
II i I
~ . ~ ui
2~J! ~. .~~
!hil ~~'~1~
Pk~1 ~~p~~
gh~~ ~~P~~.~
~~!~l;! r4!IS~j
.~m HHHh
"'99@99E>lil
~
~
.....
.....
Cl
~
~
~
~
~
f..;
~
<:
:s
:::3
~
:is
"'J
::::J
E:s
~
g
;:s
<:
E:s
"'J
c
~
=
'Cl
~
.... ....
0=
c
.. =
u..
'Cl
..
~
~
~
;1
i!li
J~~
~:!~
~{[
~)i.
J.. ::
...
o ~
iSi~ l:]
~i~ g
~~~ ~~
l,Q 2..,.<!;2
~~~$~ffi
~g~S6~
~ ~ ~
o
- ...
5 a I-
Iil !: 0
~ ~ ~;::
:I: :: U
u .. n
,~ / i,,:~
~ ij J
" " "
[!)
I..J
I-
o
Z
I-
Z
I..J
:::;;
0..
5
o
w
eeee
w
Z
::;
Z ..J
~ U.
"
g rz!
2
o J
>= c
frl t:
2 '"
Z
o :z:
u c
0: '"
~ ~
>=
o U
:; ::>
0. 0
o(
>-0..
8a:" ffi
0.. U
<:>- =>
:1:2 0
",W Of)
::li 2
~~ g
...!3 w
~<: '"
"'''' ::>
<oJ '"
V1O:: ~
OW '"
ZUl 0.
~..... l-
tno~ =>
~~:; ~
OIDO =>
~~W ~
Vl<O:: Z
uO W
~O'" ~
g~l:il ~
&Scl -<
~~:S 8
w ::li N
9:.li1z
0. 0
~~~
<:~;::
t;;~'"
~fE~
:55::i
:;:I:~
w~'"
-'xu>
~~~
",~o
~ft~
<:o.Ul
o 0
w w
e e
o
~ "0
=> I I
~ N
'"
z
U -
=>
0 W
W ::;;!
I>:
W U
0:: '"
=>
"'
I:l
0::
a.
I-
;;:
. .~
o.
I-w
'"
~~
"'w
Ull>:
<oJ=>
ffi~
"'I>:
00.
0_
-Ul
ll.
'"
00
:1:0
Ul-
01
2:0
~'"
ciga..c:
~......o~
8J..;~~~
tJc l-.....
Ui"<o
"'1(0 I-l-
0:: =>
~~f2~5
~<8~a
~g~~~
:Q"w~o
UJZIJ) f:'.I
t;:;~ zl
~O::ui~"'It
~e~?2<
1.&.l5...J1LI:c
5u~~~
0:: ..J
OWZWCl .
zti-~I..LJ~
ri~ffiV)Q;~
~cr~tf1gQ:;
I.&J~OWI.EJ::J
:::E~~~Cl@
~~w~~~
~g:c.. .~
ow./::i!':g~
:E~~~Btr.J
I2'E::oiS1f
"''<OWZ!;;
::E~u~-.:::
L:i<Ei5~~
g~i38tiW
::: <W'U}lJJ
f5~~~5iE
~~m~~o
:::i! ....JLtJ<l-
gf5!fE~~
'rl~tng~~
::E~o::S2~~
b9~g;~5
.....Lo.,::;::::<(,)
e
o
~
o
0::
0.
0.
<:
0::
o
z
;"
o
I
'"
'"
~
u
to:
0.
<oJ "'
Ul,ci CI
5~ @
--'=> w
~~ ~
;..
~~ ~
~B 0::
c[ =>
~9 ~
~~ :I:
~... t:
<: ;0
:;~
=>
~~
WI
t;:;~
0::
~~
0",
~~
"'.
<:...J
frl;s
1>:0
ll.w
e e
'"
o
!Ii
W
'"
Z
::S
...
...J
o
o
ll.
'"
I'"
i~
~ll.
"'.
~w
enu
~~
o=>
z'"
g~
0",
.z
~LL:
"':r:
li.i z~
~ :S;:c
:;: 0
ffi~
~ ::i:-,
U .....I.t..
=> O::li
8 ~;;;
0:: ut;;
~ lX III
=> W .
tn CL ffi
1:3 f5 ij
0:: >u
ll. 0
fu tJ~
'" 0 I-
9 ~a;ci
g g~~
...J ~~5
g ~lr~
:i ~~~
~ :;!}'~
~ @~~
u Ci~w
t~ ~~~
o (/1t-C)
2
w
~
'"
o
z
::::;
0.
=>
o
U
0::
W
"'.
"'>-
W2
a~
>
'Z:;'G5
00
_w
@@
:r:
Ul
...J;3
~Lr...W
0::.;'"
~O:::::1
~t:;~
[5 {Ii Ul
W .0::
ZO::W
WOo
~E;8
u
...J W
..JWI
< :r:1-
:r:1-
:~8
w I-!:::
8~8
~h;: fu
<~< tf)
~~~ ~
;x- ~ 0
~~~ ~
~:;:~Vi ~
zwO::W
~~~~
ffiE~~
i53:~o::
c,J ~a.:
QI.1.lL.J~
~~~,~
g5~~
Q: W(f.l:!:
~58~
~"f~~
~~~ffi
:::Er-- z
~ 7E~
r')D::::;!::'I.L..
@ @
o
:5 DO~
o
'"
<.:>
'"
z
0::
Ul
X
w
o
~
>==
Ul
~
~..,
'N
..,?, .
(..1
'. ~'\I
=-w--o
Uli5~~
;=i~~
~Ul W:)-
5:f ~~t:1
~O:zwl-
t--<(~~~
~ ~ ~E ~
~~Wg:~
o::~~~ffi
w...Jzt-~
g~gow
ClU1[D~(])
Ul I-
~;2:'LJ'o..Q
:=g:3C5~
UJ~~<~
~~:i~~
[(10<""-
[f)oaJe::w
~ 'ZU5m
c...5Qi:3~
~~~~~
<.V1ozcn
WZ~U'IUJ
~~~~~
Ow;5CJ;';:
w='cr.:3;-J
e::t'IDl:;i
~~ .ti:c::l
InO<'w .
WwlL.lNE5
if: ~ ~a g
~~:1ffi~
~n.~~~
~;fz<~
0>-
5'"
<:
0::8
~5
c[~
f5a
;"U
&:~
~g
5~
i=z
Uw
w>-
zz
z<
89
"
0::<
00::
...
"
E'~
t:!.f5
'!::
1::0
::>n.
~:E
8~
'"
0>-
...",
w>-
--'I>:
=>1;:,
Sa
Dd
"'I-
h~
~~u)
5~ffi
Oo-I
8:~S
@
I
w
"'
...J .
;c'::;
:I:=>
tI)~M
z N
~g~
~~b
< =>
I- "':F.
"'u-
~o~
0::::';
t;;:z<:
X ~1-
Wo<
Su.~
zo~
V)~ 0
w'"
oCJ~
o zt-
0::<",
~~g
;: g~
0"-0
Z I-
=>1;;",
~cr~
oUo
Z...J
:r:o",
Ou
- 0:
:r:zo
...-0
- w-'
zQ::......
<!l...~
agl-
a::o..!<
5~G~
... "'0
...JW'"
~g::J
t;;d:J
~~~
3 .N~
~...J___<
~~~v)
~[f)~:;t
:zw~
~~^cc
~;:;L5':.-
I-::::!N...J
=....t-~
o5~~
~w~-
~~..J~
=>~~~
o '"
~~5~
'" _u
8':.-30
aI-iii
UJ~c.n>-VI
F~:~~
~U15~c:
c<~~o
Zotl)za:
WI-w 1IJ
WOQ:~~
Zzo... 0
Ow cnu
tiffi~!iw
W:r:oE'"
~b3~::f
8~~~~
ujl-..J<
::! t; ~ ~g
~~II)a:~
~ S t5 ::i'~
~()~QO
::l~~5~
j'$ - z ~w
~ ~ 8 3'~
I H~
~i
~
~
:<t
~
~
~
f-;
~
~
::J
::::l
~
~
~
1:::
E:s
":>
t)
~
g
~
~
~
~
lSl.
<::,
-.
w
<0
::l
c[
I
'"
Vl
0.
W
Iii
--'
W
W .
I-U
Ul .
o
0,
~~
8t:(
::;0
OW
ll.Z
c.:>
~ :J
N<
~~
0::--'
<:<:
02
zl-
i5ffi
Ul>
@
=
,:=
=
~
jIII(
.... ....
,;=
.. =
U..
~
..
l-I
~
~
@
@
~I
J.,.
....
iail
r~~
,~~
~{~
~"
~
.;
~~~ ~
Q~II) -;;
~31 ;.;~
III .~...<~
~Q:o.e..~Q:;
~~!g~;a
0.8t:1I00::'::;
'" ~ ~
"
'" c
.! ,C
g
,; c 5
w l;!
~ c w-
\-, " :i
..
.. "
... d " < "
~ ~ !~
S9 b
I
'-
"
.L
ci~ .(5
~~~~
~ <;:, ~.
~~~~
~
~
~
t.tl
e:: <:
!<l "
E-; ;:;-l
~ ....
<:
:)
:::l
~
~
Q
~
"=
1-1
... "
0=
.e-
... =
U..
"=
..
J-!
~
~
~I
J,.
...
,
~~
~~i:
!ii
'r
~l~
2~
~
o
o ::;
~~~ f3
O~1Il ~
~5~ ..~
U1Ut; <~
~ci~~~Ei
Ci zlo.l' 01.&.-....
~g~ SS~
'"
'"
0:
"
0:
Q
...
E
~
~
:r
"
~
>
Q
~
~
b
_i
""
J-
<<
~
~
~
!~
~
~
c;
~
Ii
~
~
<::>
...,.
<::>
'-<
8;
e;:
~
C;)
:;::;
~
~
I:::::
~
f-..:;
~
<:.
~
:2
~
~
<:.
~
=
i
"='
~
.... ....
;=
.... =
u..
"CI
..
J,.(
~
~
il
j~~
1 ~
-u
~{-
~ ~
~ -
~~
J,.
...
Ci ~
~~~ ~
~~: ~
~g~ ~~
~lig~~$
!2~.....g""::l
ggg';C--a~
<>
'"
Q
"
~
....
B
=-
~
i::
x
o
~
>
~
~
~
j;j.1
...-
~
z
~
~ 9
1" !~
~J
~
~ii~
Cl t>l&~
)0 .oo;",o'E
m:~ ~;4
X-';:j"
i'Ut'i
.~~J!
. .
~ g.l~
5x.:::=
!! ~~~';;
i::i IiJt"'~
~ :~!~
I~it
g "51]
I
~
".
~- /
0" (
'i!i;:~ ;':;'":~'-c--~~
D~
Z<::::,
H~
~~
'"
g3
~~
Z
.
~
~
~
E
c::
~
f-.;
~
<:;
::i
t:l
::?::
~
<:;
~
Q
,:::
d
;S
.... "
.e.=
.... =
u..
'=
..
~
~
~
~I
~ '
H- ~!~
H I~~
~- ~ii
J.~ s~
....
o
'" '"
g~~ lJl
Q~1il ;!!:!
~e~ g
ihjj:g ":';VI
:i~~ ~~~
':2: 0...........0::
H~~glO;~
~8~~5!i:t
'" u
~ f5 ~
::;.
~ S
g I
u '"
o
.1
~~
"
I~
.: <\.,
~,"';
,,~
.;."~
:,,!~) ')2';:.
'cj
,--
"'!:"
~1 ~
~j:~
~~
me;
Cl \.
-'
~
Cl
Ir-- ~ ~
-....,
I
1 ;;
~~. ....:l
~ .::" ~
,'~~~ :~'f.:.iJi~;; 'i~.1J~~;~ :tt:.
H ~'''',. ta..,t.i... .__'-"-tQ< "'I.i.J~ /"Lt.:D.. ,CJ I(.:'";'!--"
,~.(.' ~ c.. N..........::E O-Ll.I .~~ ~o ..L6;';i~f~'
,/0. '-; t:l~ ;~~~~i~ ;:;j~ ';.4'
.;5 ~ ~kJ,;-tJi}5 a ;:~."
~,~ ~P(....,.u.: ~~~~ ~(/J <~';.
.:.~ ~.:.::~:.~~.r~.;
, -<:;~,
'"
IOle:,
",oj
jW,
r',-,.<
....~Lc
. .<~. 1....
~r:;
<,:~~cn
l.....
l
1::
"
::;
i..
-,
Li':
~
<(
~
~
'"
:z
o
.;
5~~
NG ~
m '"
0
~, bU :l;
~ .; ~ ...,
~~ ..J :l;
125 Cl
z
",- 'T : '"
~ -- ...
"-. ~
'::; '?$'\ ...---'
l--
I-
=
-'
" 0 r=
01
..., ",;;
:l;
~ ",<:
w
,... III
~ N 5<
u
~ " " L_
h ~
--- -~ ~
I l\Ul ..~...
IiII \ ~
I ',-
==~ c;
rl 91]
~.;; u,~ +
u::< "1)
.".
,,~ I
I-- ..J
---' :;0 I-
.01
f-- --I u
-
..........
-
-
:21
. .
i:'z
u='
!a21:.
die
.W
"''0'
,..
...
-""
001
NU
~~.-
...'"
-'",
~cn
~ ;.
:s> '\
'\
-
/
~ ~\
~- \
'"
'\
'\
o
2
m
I Cl
~~~ w 0
"'- 0
... ~... +
'" ,.,
" en
:i~~ ",..,
-:>:
m=<
'"
...
..,
'"
=
~
=
"C
~
.... 11'\
~=
.... =
u..
"CI
..
..
~
~I lb
~ ~ii
~ ~~-
~ ~~
..
m~~'"
. ~R.
S tCJ ~~
; ~ ~ti
1> ,..... ~4!
:so; 00'$/
2) ~
.!5~~ t1
~~: ~
~~~ ..~
1I''':)i3 ~~
~c:g~~f]
s=woii:--,
gg~ S5~
~ "
" '" ....
0:: 0 E
::;
"
~ ~
> -.
~ ~~
.,.
~ ~
! I l~
I ~~:~5
I ~~l~
~:~~i
..,: ~.:
~.2.!
~'oi_!'i
;~;.t
~ b~
~x..;3~
~ ~~: :
~ ~ ~1~
;~i~
g "ni
0- 8
~ ..,J
Q..
-.
I ' +~ ".c
I
I
I ~
~
I :g
I ~
, ~
!
<:; <:
I ~ '"
f-; ~
I ~
,
1 .0 <:
:s
r :::J
fr, '" ~
. ~."
Q
i
"C
~'
.... ...
~=
... e:
u..
'C
..
J-i
~
~
~I
~
J.
..
,
1!~
~~i:
~~~
, <-
~t~
~~
.. s ~
~~~ l:3
e::5=1Il g
~~~ ~~
~~~~;:
~~~~~~
:5gi:1i~o~
~ 0 .-
" "
" Q S
.::.
il Q ~
W
W > ~~
~ Q
~
~ ~
.. g
Q <
d d !~
il
i ~
~ ~
'IIJ C ..~..
,,""" _;:5
~:h
... "J~~
m:Hi
~ ..
;t;;
~ &!"!~
~ ;~ij
!:~~
U_"I:IV
US-IS;
g-3ii
I ~I
:<;
.Sl
~
~
~
~ :<;
!;; ~
~ ...
z
:s
~
~
e
J:
=
"CI
~
"'" ....
.;=
.... =
r.J;a
.~
JIIlI
~
~
~I
~
,.
~
~~
~."
J~~
~~~
"Ja
~F
~~
~
05 u
z
~?i~ ~
:30;;;; g
~~~ ~~
....l .~..,.<~
~~~~~~
o:S~:t::!.::;:1,LJ
OICC::H:UC~
ffi ~ ....
" E
c B ~
... :> .::i~1
" ~
f:l ~-
Ii -< ~
" '"
~ J !~
~ ~
c
Z ...
z
~ "
~ "
I rr
~, I
~{!~c;r~,
r"" ...
,~} w;
~ ~<
v;
~!.
":l:-.........I~tL-;
ow
~~
0:,
i.o..~
"'z
?::~
I:jo:
o:!!O
.'-"...-;;,.-. 111'-
"ld~~-~~"ld-__~
_"'__2---'::';'~_:::-7:::~
.~ .......
~.~
.0-
~~
~6
~-
~
f'-
. ""
~-..J
~o...
;;
~.&~
~
<;:;
t5
h
~
t:::
~
f..;
~
~
::;
::2
~
~
<:
"
~
o
.
Q
~
=
~
~
..... ~
C=
Ee=
u..
~
..
J.
~
~
~i ,
~I ~~~
.....:lm Jh
~~ ~f~
.1. ~~
..
Q
-;':2:~ e
:~~ ~
~5~ ~~
IIlU~",,'<~
~;~~~~
~g~S5~
~ 0 ....
'" B
0
;:.
C 0 ~
w will
~ >
a ~-
~ ~
~
a ~ ~
~ ~
~'4~4tj""::&:~t~~~;~ C::~',
· ~.-j.''''l-!'~~i-t.1'jnrt'~':''r,''~-.z~--i+f}'}~~ ~,,~~$.~~ .
.', :<{)'~.';'I~.'~''''":l. -"'" , '~- :, ""'-.i
~ 8
~ ~
....
~
~
E
~ :<;
N ::'S.
~ ~I
~ I
~ I
~
I
J
Q
~
=
"=
~
..... ...
,;,=
... =
u..
"=
..
~
~
~
~B ~
iil~ !;
H! ~~.~
H d~
~ {ffi
~ :;'1~
~ ~~
~~
...
.. s ~
s~~ f;)
~~~ g
~~g ~~
~a::g~~ffi
~~~~~g
~ ~ R
p,;: a B
- Q b
c w ...
~ ~ ~~
w .. ..
'" .. <>
<> .. ..
:3 9
"' w ~
~ ~~-
~ -
III: :
" C 0
~~t~
a~ll.;
~-"" ;..~
..~ ~=
r.::':-2
:-ul:
;t~~
~JU
in >,g:..
~ ~~... 5'
T Il:: t : j~
~:~~
.:j~i
~ eli
~
......
%
s::
:<:
Sl
!@
w
~
~
h
~
:<:
:s
~
~
sg
:<:
~
e
,.c=
=
':l
~
.... "
e>=
C=
U;a
."",
J-c
01
~I
~I
...:l.
~.
Jl..
...
h
r.~
J~
H~
W
~
"
c 2;;
~~~ t3
~~; ~
~[J~ fi~
~:i~ ;;~:
g~loJ!f~~
~gg~~g
.., ~ ~
:i
::;.
~ ii .s
...
> ~.I
~ ! ~-
i\ -<
" "
~ ~
!" !" !~
Q Q Q
~!-~s
o("'S!_
Q .!~ .
~ ..~.~s
:!!~
~~]
~f;.i
~ ~i
E;i~
~ ~ ii~
I ~~'iii
~~~ .
'~1~
g . !.if~
It "'
x:.:-
~.rft.J
1tf
. 0.. <:>
~~o=3
t;~~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
<:
~
~
f:.l
~
~
h
~
<:
::s
==2
~
~
<:
<:
~
o
~
"C
jIII(
.... ....
Q=
E=
Uol"III
"=
01"1II
.
Q.l
~
~I ~
p::j. .~
~ ~~~
~ f~~
~. *
~ "-
J... ~~
...
o ~
~?i~ f:1
s~~ g
@~3 ~~
"" Q..,. -<
~:!~~~
~;;;:~~'ZLoJ
:S2l0l:Clo::,:
" " ...
X "' E
"' '"
~ .~
0 a.1
" ~-
.. ~
.. ~
~
d
'. .. "'.
;:
~
~-~
,'.,.::
..,.....
',,;c,
,"";',
:..<......
.c
"d'
~.i:.;. '.~.,..:\.'
f <~,..:,:: ;'-1
"'::Y~,,;
<.:
;}~~:;;\i.
."
.'>: :
~. ~ .
...,,':. .,.
:l:".{':;~~;~:{'
f":t'ct'i ..
~~..;:, '.';,;
:-,
."" .:'
" .':.'
.. ',,::::
.:';';.:::t.j~;
if'
.'. ~ -.
<::> ...,
6 '0- ~
<::>
T .. -.
~l~. >
:f
; -'-"
.. i. i'
'" cc_'~ ':~~~ii,~%J~!!~~..,,~
.::~ .c~ ;./;; . ~~ I
lr~"~~A
"
.r-:
.. '. >-10 '"
",
~
S2
~
~
f;j
::::; <;
~ ;5
::;s ~
....
<;
::s
::::J
~
~
".j
.s
. w
'l<
iiili; :< ,..:
1-
0 ;!; ~ ~~ "'
...0>
NSS~ u, ffi j lri
~",p: =0 '"
W
.~~ ~S~ ~
"'U
I~
o
~
=
"C
p.j
.... ..,
~=
.... =
u..
"C
..
J.
~
~
:.
I~ '"
Ol~ I':;;
'"
.., ------- . O-;! 0::0
~ ~'" 0>
~ '"' ~~!' "'>
-=>
~~C ;;;; ~~ }
u-.r+ '" is I
2-
...: ;!!' 00 /1,1
N ; ~ "!
-
,
~;~
.~~
~ii
~{~
~~
J,.-
....
ji
m
:"
I:>
-~
~I
~'.
d'"
:, x. i.' 101
. :q:~"
~ <3~.
:i,: Ii i
f: EJ
~'-~
';..I
,~ ...iT
I--
-
/'"
~
o
0..
p.
..,
u
Gj
w
I--
,'~ ,
"
-
o ~
~i~ ~
C~Ul g
~~~ ~~
~~~~<~
~~~~~~
~g~Sa~
""'""
." ~
~~ ~
g: z
~ ~ r--
p; 0 8
s:
=-
c fl,.- ~
"R.... 0 .:;..1
_ ~ .1-
a .( ~
'- !'
" z
,:):
~ '" I ~
..~ ~ "
"0
'"
~ .~ E
~-;J-~ ~
N :~ !"
~ ~
1I !~
D C 0 I
\-
~
:j;;
IA \
7v \ E-u
//11
i'-, -,
I '1/ I I~
;,.. '-..... =' ... p :;);
.... ~...
I ~:i;
I ,
~ ~ ~~ .
>- ~.'l
;; c :~!t
-;;-~
g ~t~~
" ll'I =--:..::
0 ~5~
~
I ~ 0 i5 :j!~ ~
" c::: :a::tg~
0 I ~~{~
i ~..~ :
g . ~i~
...,
~
~
:<'.6 0
~ ~il.:5 ,z
~ ~~ ffi W
CD ~t ~ "It"
~
...
:...
~
o
Z
ill
o
UJ
-1
i
ffi
i !
"c
a g ~
!Iiii
'l;'< 11"*, ~. 0
B~ [H',fB
I"I~ ~Z
~
Sl
11
~
~
~
~
i<
1il
~
~
~ ~
~ ;;
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ :Ii l!i
~-u
\
\
I \
\ "
I \
,!}\1f ,.
I I
\ ,.
\ \
\ .. ~
I \ i
I "~
!
~ " "\~~
d" \
d:1
.&14
9 ..
d "
9 ..
I
I
I
\ '>",
.""
\ ~Q
"'<3
"iO
~~
~\1f ~"
\
\
I
I
\ ...
I
'<21-7
3.
r25l .,;3\-1
l.illJ 15
~
a::
o
5
w
z
::io
UJ<:(
9::0
o....cc
a::z
Oct
u. -
o
....J-
00:
a::UJ
1-:2:
Zz
00
o
o
u::
u...
<:(
0:
I-
I
-r I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
-r I
I
.n,\ 1i'
..1\
.. I
"j
~
t
r
~
C
'" r?;;
~~ r~
~~ \.0
: .~ J
!L_~ oIl
\-1
\
\ A
\
I
I
11f
I A
\
I
I
-r I .A.
\
\
~
.~
~
~
ffi
~
.!!
i
Jii
~
~
~
~
'A
~
~
~
~
.~
-1
t;
.~
G2O-2
(2<,00)0
'11'20-....
(36)0
~'21-7
36
""
;g; """
;g; ~
...,
~
~
:<:;
~ c3
~ f:5
e:: a
~ 10
~ ~
~ k;
~
h
~
::8
~
i
'=
~
.... "
~;
u....
pC
....
~
~
~
a::
o
50
a::<C
~g
....J2
oct
a::-'
I-::::!
2::2
00
0::2
oz
U::O
~
cc
I-
~l
~ <<
~ 1!~
rJ !i~
"t'='.
~a~ I
..
;sA ~
ili-;;~
~~I'!}1:111l
1.8a:;;-5~
g g ~
'" '" ti
'"
:2
is B E,
~ ~ a:;;:.
~ t ~
" << "
~ ~
. .:i
i i ~
~ 0 "-
~ ~ ~
i
g
50
15 ~ i
~ ~ ~
I ~ I I
i2
. 0 ~-u
~
! ~
0 l5
~ '= Il(s,j
Z c El ~
~ I L-m.
W ffi
(!) ~ ~ ~
W
...J
t' if"*, ~ ~
.....
~
r J.-.
~
~
'I' . I
.00; ~
_ <:? avO'g &1 0 'gO .LSfl.:J07 'gO NVIamgJ1l_
<=t>
~
""
C>
;= .9..
OU :t~
z~ ....~
LoJt;; ~~
5
u
~
~.
3NOZ lad'r'! ,00 L
,oo;r
Orll9';~)
Z-oUl
I
[
I
[Q
I~
I~
I~
I~
I
.fJ.11i'
I
J
I
J
[
[
[
I
::;
T :1
[if
I
I
I
I
.fJ,11i'-L
I
J
I
J -L
I
[
I
I
I
I
I
~
cm-2
(lh6ll)D
~
3f<<)z 113d'r'! ,OOl
.c-=
1L
o
Cf)
Z
o
i=
o 0
tl5 4:
0:00
W4:O:
I-oz
;?;n:<(
I-z-l
<C<(::!
~....I2
0:....10
o~~
:;:::ow
2>
0:'0
OZo:
1L:::;0
o
....I-I-
On:(J)
a:w:>
1-20
z 0
o -I
o
o
u:
1L
<C
a:
I-
,~
~
- - - - -~
<=t>
-t il
~
I'GH
(35)0
,lIOi
C")
o
B;
~~ ~~
~~ ~c
o
'"
~
~
....
<::>
....
tl
h
~
~
~
~
~
f-i
~
~
:::i
~
~
~
<S
~
~
U
U
~
~
~
=
,::
=
~
jIII(
.... ....
;=
... =
V..
~
'e
~
~
~
~I~
~ i~"
- f~!
~ ~~3
~ H~
J.; a~
..
. ~
Iii!!i~ ;
~~M ~
:<<I-~
~~d6~
~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~
_ e
B ; b
.:.:: a L;jz
.. 0; ~
~ :: ~
.. ~ ~
!:; 9
~ w ~
~~
~
November 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT City Attorney -- Bill Nary
REQUEST Administrative Leave POlicy
Department Reports
November 16. 2004
ITEM NO.
6-A-l
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
Contacted:
EmaiJed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
SUBJECT:
PURPOSE:
POLICY:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
STANDARD OPERTAING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
NO. 4.9
ADMINISTRA TIVE LEAVE WITH PAY
To provide the ability for Department Directors to grant
discretionary paid leave to employees for extenuating
circumstances where the employees accumulated leave is
unavailable or the Director wants to provide an employee a
positive reinforcement for work performed.
This leave can also be used as a non-disciplinary method to
remove an employee from the workplace, without penalty,
to facilitate in the general operation ofthe City or to allow
for an investigation of a pending complaint.
The City recognizes that all situations deserve individual
scrutiny. Therefore this policy is intended as a guideline to
the Department Directors to grant Administrative Leave
with Pay to employees when the employee's own
accumulated leave is inadequate or unavailable.
The City further acknowledges that the Department
Directors should have the discretion, authority, and
ultimate responsibility for the operations of their respective
departments. Exercising of this discretion should be done
fairly, equitably, and with due concern to the responsibility
that the City has to the taxpayers and the public. In the
exercise of their discretion, the Directors should have
ability to recognize good performance and acknowledge the
same by the ability to grant leave as a positive
reinforcement tool. However, the overall efficiency of the
operation of the department must be maintained.
The City also recognizes that occasional circumstances,
such as an investigation may warrant the need to remove an
employee from the work group for the benefit of the City or
the employee. In these instances the employee may be
better served by not being in the workplace and a penalty or
punitive measure may not be appropriate at that time. This
decision will at the discretion of the Department Director
with the advice and assistance of the City Attorney and
Human Resources.
AUTHORITY &
RESPONSIBILITY:
The Mayor and the Department Directors and shall have
the discretion to grant leave to individual employees in
increments and consistent with methods listed below. The
Directors authority shall be consistent with the policy as
stated above.
PROCEDURES AND
RELATED INFORMATION:
Administrative Leave with Pay for one day or less of the
employee's normal work day - Discretion ofthe
Department Director.
Administrative Leave with Pay for more than the
employee's normal work day, but not to exceed one (1)
regular work week of the employee - Discretion ofthe
Department Director with the approval of the City
Attorney/HR Director or designee.
Administrative Leave with Pay for more than one (1)
regular work week of the employee - Discretion of the
Department Director with the approval ofthe City
Attorney/HR Director and the Mayor.
In some instances it may be necessary to seek approval of
the City Council for this leave. The decision to seek
approval from the City Council shall be at the discretion of
the City Attorney and the Mayor.
November 12, 2004 Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 16, 2004
APPLICANT Mayor's Office ITEM NO. 6..B~ 1
REQUEST Discussion of ACHD sidewalk - Ranking of Community Program Curb, Gutter, and
sidewalk
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
i
4f'I';'-i~ i.~~
AC~ Ada County Highway District
John S. Franden - President
David E. Wynkoop - 1 st Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake - 2nd Vice President
Sherry R. Huber - Commissioner
David Bivens - Commissioner
3775 Adams Street
Garden City ID 83714-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us
November 1, 2004
The Honorable Tammy DeWeerd
Mayor of the City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Ranking of Community Program: Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Projects
Mayor DeWeerd,
ACHD has begun the process of ranking applications it has received for the Community Program: Curb,
Gutter and Sidewalk Projects. Agency Support is one factor we use in ranking project. ACHD considers the
ranking of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk projects by each respective city.
".., ~'c:_ ~.\
There are four projects in the City of Meridian that ACHD will be considering for funding under this program
in 2006. We request that the City of Meridian ranks the following projects and return this ranking to ACHD
by November 19, 2004. These projects are compiled from applications submitted to ACHD by cities,
citizens and neighborhood associations and include local and collector roadway projects. Minor arterial
sidewalk projects are not eligible under this program.
Below is a listing of the Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk projects within the City of Meridian that will be prioritized
for 2006:
· W. 1st St. (west side), Cherry Lane to Washington Ave.
· 2-1/2 St. (west side), Cole Valley High School to Rite Aid Shopping Center
· W. 8th St. (east side), 1400 8th St. to 735 W. Cherry Lane
· Waltman (south side), Larkspur to Linder
This process is being used on a trial basis and will not impact the City's Five-Year Work ProgramfTlP
priority list. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
L:l~
Don Kostelec
Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating
CC: Central Files
PPC Files-City of Meridian
Anna Canning & Steve Siddoway-City of Meridian
Bruce Mills
S:\2006-2010 FYWP\Community Programs\City Request Letters\2004 Nov 1 City of Meridian CGS letter.doc
Created on 10/31/2004 10:29:00 AM
Page 1 of 1
November 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Mayor's Office
REQUEST Meridian TIP
Department Reports
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
6..8..2
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
rJ.i~ {)/v!~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
15
REQUEST Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~vY
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
November 16, 2004
ITEM NO.
16
REQUEST Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (l) (f)
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at publiC meeHngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN
OFF SCHEDULED FOR
November 17, 2004
CYCLE 1
MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you so
choose, that you have the right to a pre-termination hearing
at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, November 16,2004, before the
Mayor and City Council, to appear in person to be judged
on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that
your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may
retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on
II -11-0 4--€?ber 4, 2~nless payment is received in full. Is
there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her
water, sewer and trash delinquency?
(N 0 response.)
MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal
or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth
Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even
though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The
amount of the tum-offlist is $212,864.93
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 04:59pm
Current PeriOd: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer.Cust No () = {<} 880000001
Customer.BiII Cycle = 1
Last Pml Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08/2012004 07120/2004 Date Amount
31.57.0017.1 82.18 68.66 13.52
24.04.0552.1 ABBEY BEN 80.81 40.03 40.78 1012012004 40.00 -
30.74.1508.2 ACHD 45.10 21.62 23.48 10/05/2004 25.44 -
30.74.0727.1 ACORN APARTMENTS 156.90 69.14 87.76 09/21/2004 204.38 -
23.02.1930.2 ACUNA, JULIO & 105.78 39.23 16.21 31.82 18.52 10126/2004 50.00 -
30.74.2668.1 ADAMS, CATHY 118.51 56.87 61.64 10/18/2004 78.30 .
30.74.3602.2 ADAMS, CYNTHIA 116.29 68.21 48.08 10/18/2004 63.30 -
36.69.0632.1 ADAMS, RAYMOND & VICKIE 124.86 50.72 74.14 09/21/2004 264.90 -
24.04.0934.5 AGUERO, JEREMY 59.38 58.14 1.24
30.74.2942.3 AGUERO, JEREMY A 126.90 68.92 57.98 10/18/2004 122.05 -
35.35.0190.2 AHEARN, THOMAS 102.84 43.04 41.96 17.84 10120/2004 100.00 -
23.02.4740.1 ALBRECHT, JUDY 108.23 58.37 49.86 10/28/2004 69.46 -
37.37.3822.1 ALLEN, SCOTT 64.27 32.51 31.76 10/19/2004 33.00.
35.35.0194.4 ALLMOND, JOSEPH & TAKEIA 71.14 48.16 22.98 10/15/2004 45.00 -
30.74.2968.3 ALVAREZ, JOSE 91.53 41.08 46.86 3.59
23.02.0490.2 AMBROSE, ROBERT 152.04 72.78 79.26 10/26/2004 120.00 -
23.02.0860.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 127.89 20.39 40.16 41.14 26.20 08/13/2004 60.00 -
30.74.1026.1 ANDERSON, DOUGLAS 114.68 42.54 37.54 34.60 08/17/2004 104.10 -
25.05.0160.1 ANDERSON, GORDON & JUDYT 128.61 40.85 87.76 09/21/2004 190.22 -
30.74.'2432.2 ANDREWS, MICHAEL 55.39 35.29 20.10 10/15/2004 30.00 -
23.02.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 101.20 61.88 39.32 10/08/2004 80.00 -
22.50.1990.2 ANSON, REBECCA 157.94 42.52 54.28 61.14 08/16/2004 50.36 -
35.64.5062.2 ANSON, RICK 90.81 37.09 38.92 14.80 08/27/2004 100.00 -
24.04.1664.3 ANSON, RICK & REBECCA 117.45 42.81 74.64 09/23/2004 107.90 -
20.47.0048.1 ANTHONY, MAX 94.12 53.97 40.15 10/15/2004 36.65 -
22.50.1338.2 ARGON, NATHAN & SUNNY 79.00 41.78 37.22 09/21/2004 39.18 -
23.02.3822.2 ARGON, SUNNY & NATHAN 126.68 64.64 62.04 09/21/2004 59.10 -
36.69.0530.1 ATCHISON, JEFFERY 115.55 59.31 56.24 10/27/2004 69.96 -
22.51.3370.1 ATWOOD, CINDI 71.38 42.92 28.46 10/2212004 10.00 -
23.01.1040.2 AZEVEDO, JOE & HEATHER 96.30 57.78 38.52 10/26/2004 37.54 -
22.50.2000.1 BACHLEDA, DONNA 113.64 62.04 51.60 10/13/2004 51.60-
22.50.2404.4 BACHMANN, LEVI 105.40 56.54 48.86 10/26/2004 35.00 -
22.50.4614.3 BACON, J.A. & D.A. 186.61 163.14 23.47
22.51.0694.1 BAILEY, PEGGY 137.78 50.60 42.12 45.06 09/27/2004 45.06 -
22.51.0514.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 118.87 59.10 59.77 10/18/2004 62.00 -
36.69.1578.1 BAIN, JOHN 91.34 28.80 30.29 32.25 09/08/2004 62.54 -
21.48.2000.2 BAKERINVESTMENTS,LLC 200.70 73.91 67.19 59.60 08/26/2004 59.60 -
22.51.3910.1 BAKER, HELEN F 62.96 60.88 2.08 10/27/2004 53.01 -
24.04.1988.3 BALDOCCHI EUGENE & INES 91.48 65.10 26.38 10/15/2004 78.72 -
36.65.3108.3 BALL, MICHAEL 96.12 47.62 48.50 10/29/2004 55.36 -
22.50.2142.3 BARAJAS, ANTONIO & VELMA 132.58 74.94 57.64 10/13/2004 52.74 -
21.21.9046.1 BARNACK, BILLIE 77.98 25.25 18.83 15.07 18.83 07/19/2004 15.07 -
25.25.0104.2 BARNES, GREG & JASMINE 65.50 50.49 15.01 10/2212004 51.34 -
22.51.3200.1 BARROWS, SHARON 60.76 58.76 2.00 10/28/2004 43.38 -
23.02.0472.1 BARTH, JEFF 84.98 38.62 46.36 09/30/2004 68.90 -
22.51.0932.1 BAYVIEW - KELLOGG 18.27 13.44 3.48 1.35
22.50.1022.1 BEACH, ROXANNE 133.56 68.02 65.54 10/19/2004 70.00 -
30.74.2616.3 BECK,DEAN 110.10 37.20 72.90 10/19/2004 65.44 -
30.74.2640.2 BECK. JEFFERY & TRACEY 166.00 83.54 82.46 09/21/2004 77.96-
24.04.2010.7 BELAIR, DENNIS 85.05 44.50 40.55 09/09/2004 297.82 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( >>
r
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 04:59pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
23.02.3600.1 BENNETT, HOWARD 63.61 41.40 22.21 10/19/2004 50.00 -
23.02.1008.1 BENNETT, JAMES 119.18 59.42 59.76 10/19/2004 70.00 -
36.68.0312.2 BENSON, JR. DARRYL 100.53 49.35 51.18 10/12/2004 49.22 -
35.35.3038.2 BERNHARD,MATTHEW 79.12 39.12 40.00 10/15/2004 40.00-
30.74.1036.2 BEVINGTON, WILSON 74.43 37.25 37.18 10/18/2004 40.00 -
23.02.0452.1 BIERY, DARA LYNN 68.63 51.31 17.32 10/05/2004 50.00 -
32.32.4068.3 BIGLEY, CYNTHIA 49.36 24.24 25.12 09/21/2004 48.28 -
34.34.6106.2 BINDER, BRET 88.11 45.59 42.52 09/14/2004 50.36 -
37.72.0256.2 BIRDGE, RICHARD & TONI 91.05 44.61 46.44 10/20/2004 47.88 -
30.74.2724.1 BISHOP, CALVIN 144.47 50.49 47.42 46.56 09/21/2004 80.00 -
24.03.0328.2 BISHOP, JEFFREY 108.89 30.55 30.42 36.30 11.62 09/14/2004 90.00 -
24.04.1834.1 BITONI, MARK 108.31 48.53 59.78 10/14/2004 75.00 -
24.03.0308.2 BITTNER, JAMES & PAULINE 92.03 45.59 46.44 10/15/2004 46.44 -
35.65.0336.2 BLAGBURG, THOMAS & TAMAR 67.75 42.06 25.69
23.02.2140.1 BLAIR, WILMA 118.60 33.72 45.38 39.50 09101/2004 39.50 -
23.02.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 122.89 48.25 40.72 33.92 10/04/2004 40.00 -
24.04.1140.2 BLASER, GLENN 74.12 20.64 53.48 09/2212004 89.02 -
23.02.1580.2 BLESSENGER, RONNIE & HAZE 131.44 30.94 62.80 37.70 09/2212004 65.74 -
24.04.0536.8 BOBKO, RAYMOND 110.99 54.09 56.90 09/17/2004 103.02 -
30.74.2332.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 97.18 49.35 47.83 10/19/2004 82.00 -
23.02.0488.1 BOBKO, RAYMOND 111.77 50.88 60.89 10/05/2004 63.59 -
24.04.1150.2 BODILY, DANIEL 80.96 40.64 40.32 11/01/2004 42.00 -
22.50.1726.2 BOESIGER, MAX 126.50 41.94 36.40 42.28 5.88 09/17/2004 100.00 -
24.04.0862.5 BOESPFUNG, DAN & KATHY' 103.98 48.16 55.82 09/27/2004 90.72 -
30.74.2482.1 BOGDANSKI, DONALD 89.73 41.99 47.74 10/13/2004 56.26 -
22.50.3696.2 BOHN, HEATHER 85.20 44.88 40.32 09/2212004 157.68 -
23.02.1800.2 BOLTON,TERESA 98.74 44.02 54.70 .02 10/18/2004 88.00 -
30.30.6050.2 BONNEY, AARON 154.75 41.67 41.54 71.54 08/23/2004 122.66 -
20.46.0510.1 BOOHER, FRANK 62.81 35.17 27.64 09/14/2004 28.62 -
22.51.3226.3 BOSLAU, NANCILEE 74.00 40.64 33.36
22.50.0730.1 BOSSE, TOM 95.02 49.30 45.72 09/27/2004 48.66 -
25.05.0368.1 BOUDREAUX, JAMES 143.33 65.85 77.48 09/23/2004 87.28 -
24.04.1918.2 BOWEN, SCOTT 61.51 61.11 .40 10/26/2004 68.00 -
37.37.4224.2 BOWERS, MICHAEL & PATRICi/l 59.50 29.80 29.70 09/17/2004 33.62 -
25.05.0802.1 BOYLE, JOHN 119.41 57.51 61.90 10/19/2004 68.00 -
34.34.5080.1 BRADFORD, DALE & MARTHA 179.34 31.36 28.42 29.40 90.16
30.74.3256.2 BRADY,MARK 87.13 44.61 42.52 09/17/2004 46.01 -
23.02.3670.4 BRAINBRIDGE, STEVE 106.69 88.07 18.62 10/25/2004 100.00 -
22.51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 52.58 42.92 9.66 11/01/2004 50.00 -
22.50.1988.4 BRANDT, M. & WiEDENHEFT, A. 91.74 52.40 39.34 10/27/2004 45.88 -
22.50.2194.2 BRAUN, STEPHANIE 66.24 36.38 29.86 09/27/2004 60.70 -
30.74.3974.2 BREEN, RICHARD 41.87 41.83 .04 10/14/2004 80.00 -
24.04.1808.2 BREWER, MICHAEL 56.47 43.04 13.43
36.69.1006.4 BREWER, SIDNEY & JOYCE 85.98 42.06 43.92 09/21/2004 48.82 -
23.02.3370.4 BRIGGS, TERI 118.30 75.98 42.32 1 0/20/2004 110.00 -
23.02.1290.5 BRINEGAR, E.E. 123.52 46.14 58.78 18.60 10/19/2004 100.00 -
23.02.1310.5 BRINEGAR, E.E. 82.21 39.21 43.00 10101/2004 39.08 -
23.02.1650.1 BRINEGAR, E.E. 46.78 33.15 13.63 09/21/2004 35.84 -
23.02.3712.2 BRINEGAR, E.E. 63.33 59.53 3.80 11/15/2004 60.00 -
23.02.1320.2 BRINEGAR, E.E. 70.65 43.67 26.98 11102/2004 60.00 -
24.04.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 173.37 82.85 90.52 10/20/2004 150.00 -
30.74.3010.1 BROTZMAN, HENRY 121.13 59.65 61.48 09/23/2004 61.48 -
22.50.2434.1 BROWN, BRIAN 102.73 57.89 44.84 10/19/2004 50.00 -
36.69.0574.1 BROWN, JAMES & SHERRY 111.43 48.37 63.06 10/20/2004 90.00 -
23.02.0958.8 BROWN, KATHERINE 155.48 115.90 39.58 10/21/2004 121.14 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
t
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account Ust- cou ncil Page: 3
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 04:59pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Ba lance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Ba lance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07120/2004 Date Amount
24.03.0388.1 BRUNTON, LESLIE 104.79 51.97 52.82 10/19/2004 52.82 -
20.47.0028.1 BUCK, CHARMIAN 53.09 29.50 23.59 09/23/2004 24.57 -
23.01.0950.3 BURNETTE, DIANNE 131.70 50.44 70.98 10.28 10/1512004 45.74 -
22.50.4008.2 BURNHAM, DARLA 188.46 77.88 110.58 09/22/2004 343.06 -
22.51.3610.1 BURNHAM, F.M. 45.57 24.76 20.81 09/14/2004 21.79 -
36.69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 111.24 35.88 38.66 36.70 08119/2004 74.38 -
24.04.2308.1 BUTTERFIELD, CHARLES &. TO~ 240.67 100.01 140.66 10/06/2004 118.34 -
36.68.0232.2 BYINGTON, ALEX &. HEIDI 100.53 49.35 51.18 10/14/2004 48.24.
24.04.1392.1 BYINGTON, DARREN 103.45 46.89 56.56 09121/2004 54.60.
22.50.0724.1 C.F.1. INVESTMENTS 50.10 33.44 16.66 11/10/2004 40.00 -
36.65.3136.2 CABRAL, JOE &. JAMIE 83.53 40.85 42.68 11/02/2004 44.64 -
35.35.0168.2 CACIOPPO, JOSEPH 80.10 40.10 40.00 10/1312004 40.98 -
22.50.0206.2 CADENHEAD, RUSSEL &. LOPEZ 245.24 172.76 72.48 11/10/2004 100.00 -
30.74.2722.5 CAFFERTY, LORI 91.86 46.96 44.90 09/21/2004 52.74 -
21.21.9172.2 CALLISTER, DAVID &. REBECCA 53.33 48.4 7 4.86 10118/2004 42.09 -
35.35.Q1 06.2 CAMPAGNI, DAVID 93.44 44.84 48.60 10/05/2004 48.00 -
30.30.6280.2 CAMPBELL, ROBERT 89.35 44.61 44.74 11/02/2004 47.00 "
23.01.3690.1 CANFOR USA CORPORATION 390.34 252.31 138.03 09/27/2004 179.39 .
23.02.4340.1 CARRIER, RICHARD 101.22 55.34 45.88 09/20/2004 53.72 -
22.50.0354.1 CARSTENSEN, DENNIS 125.20 67.92 57.28 09/27/2004 65.00 -
36.69.1122.2 CARTER, J.R. 124.79 55.07 69.72 10/15/2004 55.00 -
24.04.0798.2 CASE, RICHARD &. DONNA 90.07 44.61 45.46 09/21/2004 40.46 -
22.50.0310.2 CASS, BRUCE C 121.22 55.34 65.88 09/28/2004 43.92 -
24.03.0850.2 CAST, PETER &. VERIONICA 107.17 70.03 37.14 10/20/2004 60.00 -
25.25.0102.2 CHADWELL, MARCY 45.30 45.00 .30 11/02/2004 49.50 -
25.09.0012.1 CHAMBERS CONSTRUCTION 4,52 3.48 1.04
20.46.0232.3 CHAN, KIN WA 152.53 82.57 69.96 10/14/2004 71.00 -
23.01.1970.1 CHANDLER, CURTIS E 128.20 125.26 2.94 10/19/2004 106.88 -
23.01,1960.1 CHANDLER, CURTIS E 148.14 123.80 24.34 10/19/2004 115.88 "
23.23.3000.2 CHANDLER, JASON &. TABBUTT 95.67 54.13 41.54 10108/2004 57.38 -
24.03.0070.1 CHANDLER-ZUNDEL, PATRICIA 78.95 41.01 37.94 11/03/2004 34.02 -
23.02.5910.2 CHANEY, BENJAMIN &. CRISTY 110.98 71.02 39.96
30.74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 86.47 42.81 43.66 10/13/2004 43.66 -
30.74.3676.4 CHENEY, STEVEN 100.92 34.54 37.38 29.00 09/21/2004 40.00 -
23.02.6100.1 CHENEY, STEVEN 77.26 42.10 35.16 1 0/1912004 57.56 -
23.02.4700.2 CHENEY, STEVEN 126.32 50.44 75.88 10/19/2004 52.34 -
30.74.3020.2 CHERRY, DARREL 149.24 72.95 51.84 24.45 09/21/2004 24.45 -
22.50.0500.3 CHESTER, FAYE 73.10 40.30 32.80 10/18/2004 29.86 -
30.30.6228.2 CHILDRESS, JACK 83.57 38.14 37.06 8.37
24.03.0814.1 CHILDS, KIM 72.41 36.27 36.14 09/15/2004 75.22 -
22.50.4016.3 CHRISTENSON, TAMI 109.81 37.79 34.18 37.84 09/02/2004 50.00 .
23.02.3466.2 CHRISTIANSEN, SUE ANN 77.78 35.02 42.76 09/23/2004 60.40 .
22.51.1168.3 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR &. COI 44.99 11.03 7.55 11.31 15.10 06/29/2004 15.10 -
22.51.1174.2 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR &. COI 94.00 26.23 22.59 22.59 22.59 08/03/2004 64.Q1 -
22.51.1170.2 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR &. COI 45.94 12.01 11.31 11.31 11.31 08/03/2004 30.17 -
30.74.0428.2 CHRISTIANSON, BRAD 48.02 38.14 9.88
25.05.0698.1 CHRISTMAN, MARIE ANN 127.61 65.83 61.78 09/15/2004 89.22 -
32.32.4844.2 CHRISTOFFERSON, ANDY &. RE 116.74 57.48 59.26 10/1 2/2004 61.22 -
37.37.5054.1 CHRISTOPHER HAYES 19.58 12.30 7.28
30.74.2676.1 CHURCHMAN,KARENLEE 142.07 57.69 84.38 10/19/2004 105.00 "
37.37.4222.3 CLARK, KIMBRA 95.79 39.12 56.67
37.37.3808.2 CLARK, VICTOR &. JODY 104.13 51.15 50.04 2.94 10/19/2004 32.10 -
22.51.0690.2 CLAY, SANDRA 94.14 36.38 28.88 28.88 09121/2004 38.40 -
24.04.0116.1 CLELLAND, STEVE 36.50 35.52 .96 10/06/2004 35.42 -
25.05.0766.2 CLEMENT, MICHAEL 110.46 49.24 61.24 10/19/2004 88.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
f (
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 04:59pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum Amountoelinquent Balance
Last Pm! Last pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
25.05.0344.1 CLIFF, DWIGHT 73,03 47.05 25.98 10/22/2004 60.00 -
30.74.3238.2 CLONINGER. SHAD 79,21 41.83 37.38 10/19/2004 45.00 -
37.37.3624.2 CLUFF. HAROLD & ELAINE 90.07 45.59 44.48 09/27/2004 44.48 -
29.07.0892.3 CLUPHF, CHRIS 43.00 42.06 .94 10/28/2004 42.00 -
35.65.0230.1 CLURE, MARVIN & SHIRL Y 93.99 45.59 48.40 09/21/2004 92.88 -
36.68.0318.5 COFFIELD, RONALD 66.32 50.49 15.83
22.51.0874.1 COLE. ORVILLE 97.55 52.22 45.33 09/30/2004 72.33 -
22.51.4170.4 COLSON, HOWARD 64.44 29.68 34.76 10/14/2004 100.00 -
35.65.0396,1 COMPTON, RICHARD 119.73 40.03 39.90 39.80 09/21/2004 40.00 -
25.25.0164.2 COMPTON, TIMOTHY & RUPE, J 62.76 29.96 32.80 09/21/2004 95.98 -
37.37.3008.1 CON CORE 18.97 15.49 3.48 10/19/2004 2.02 -
37.37.3004.1 CONCORE LLC 46.98 32.66 10.34 3.98
24.03.0398.2 CONGER, ALEX 117.19 57,19 60.00 10/05/2004 78.62 -
23.02.1920.1 CONRADI. LINDA 104.32 52.36 51.96 10/19/2004 80.00 -
25.05.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 142.Q1 60.29 81.72 10/19/2004 88.58 -
23.02.0640.1 COPE, LINDA 128.07 79.71 48.36 10/20/2004 80.00 -
25.25.9886.1 COREY BARTON HOMES 47.89 24.01 23.88 09/21/2004 20.12 -
22.50.2114.1 CORNELL. BRUCE & LEE 61.34 33.44 27.90 10/05/2004 28.88 -
24.04.0120.2 CORONA, JUAN & ROMONA 107.80 57,10 50.70 10/12/2004 60.00 -
31.52.0040.3 CORYELL, EARL 111.64 29,80 35.58 46.26 08/23/2004 61.00 -
24.04.1746.1 COSGROVE, AMY 149.13 54,73 94.40 10/19/2004 39.00 -
23.02.0390.2 COSTNER, LORETA 76.02 49.46 26.56 11/01/2004 60.00 -
35.35.0182.2 COVINO, MELODY 79.44 41.24 38.20 10/05/2004 87.18 -
23.02.2460.1 COX, LISA L 74.20 36.66 37.54 10/19/2004 41.46 -
36.69.0776.3 CRAIG, PETER 82.85 39.53 43.32 10/05/2004 43.32 -
30.74,0100.2 CRAWFORD, SARAH 97.72 31.76 65.96 10/19/2004 70.86 -
22.22,0590.1 CREEKSIDE ARBOUR 126.47 51.89 37.63 22.59 14.36
46.60.0064.1 CROCKER BUILDING CO 28.34 17.70 10.64 10/26/2004 24.84 -
30.74.2336.1 CROWELL, GARY 102.64 41.08 61.56 10/19/2004 69.40 -
25.05.0154.1 CROY, CLAUDE 114.38 22.45 91.93 10/19/2004 91.93 -
30.74.2732.2 CURTIS, TROY 77.22 39.12 38.10 11/10/2004 40.00 -
30.74.2692.2 CUSHMAN, KELLY 115.89 57.03 56.86 10/19/2004 73.56 -
24.04.2116.2 CUSTER, PAUL & SUZANNE 102.64 52.84 49.60 10/01/2004 91.94 -
24.04.0686.2 DA ROSA. JULIE 145.40 65.30 60.10 10/20/2004 60.10-
23.02.0910.1 DAILEY, DON 43.90 42.92 .98 10/08/2004 7.57 -
22.50,0264.3 DALE, MARK 68.64 26.90 26.26 15.48 10/20/2004 70.00 -
24.03,0872.1 DALLMANN, DAVID 71.58 38.78 32.80 10/05/2004 33.38 -
22.50.3852.2 D'AMICO, JENNIFER 65.26 36.38 28.88 09/21/2004 13.68 -
23.01.4601.1 DAVE WILLIAMS 28.08 15.78 12.30 11/08/2004 12.30 -
24.03.0874.2 DAVENPORT, ERIC 66.04 31.60 34.44 09/14/2004 68.88 -
22.50.0602.2 DAVIS. JENNIFER 82.26 41.94 40.32 09/23/2004 43.26 -
23.02.0908.2 DAVIS, MARGARET 87.82 47.66 40.16 10/19/2004 39.18 -
25.25.9934.2 DAVIS, RAYMOND & JUDITH 88.92 44.02 44.90 09/21/2004 42.94 -
22.50.0288.6 DAWSON, CAROL 160.44 42.60 70.00 47.84 09/22/2004 141.76 -
36.36.0996.2 DAWSON, CAROL D. 93.01 47.55 45.46 10/05/2004 8.37 -
35.35.1212.2 DAYLEY, MARK & KATHRYN 50.67 33.33 17.34 08/13/2004 34.74 -
22.51.3282.2 DE LA MOTTE, GLENN & MYRW 164.27 107.75 40.98 15.54
36.69.1356.2 DEBENHAM,BRETT 133.51 58.49 75.02 10/01/2004 90.70 -
30.74.3714.2 DEGRANGE, CHARLEY & BENTL 99.98 31.16 30.98 37.84 09/13/2004 46.66 -
37.37.3994.2 DEJOURNETT, TAMARA 91.05 45.59 45.46 10/13/2004 47.42 -
37.72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 38.25 38.07 .18 10/19/2004 87.46 -
23.02.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 76.12 45.48 30.64 10/12/2004 85.00 -
23,01.4602.1 DIAMOND PROPERTIES 541.31 329.75 211.56 10/14/2004 272.93 -
22,51.1323.1 DIAMOND PROPERTIES 107.46 27.54 47.58 32.34 10/14/2004 47.58 -
22.51.1322.1 DIAMOND PROPERTIES 310,09 175.36 134.73 10/14/2004 176.09 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 04:59pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Derinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
23.02.1960.1 DICKSON, DONALD M 76.26 39.28 36.98 10/2012004 eo.OO -
30.30.6142.2 DllECCE, COSIMO 53.88 18.68 17.60 17.60 08/24/2004 35.18 -
22.50.0204.1 DIPAOLA, JONATHAN 75.90 41.94 33.96 09/2212004 76.00 -
23.01.1434.5 DlST AN, TRACY & MARIA 260.97 111.10 65.86 64.88 19.13
22.50.1922.2 DIXON, KIEV & Ul Y 77.53 39.59 37.94 10/05/2004 37.94 -
36.69.0490.1 DIXON, SCOTT & HEATHER 77.48 40.26 37.22 10/19/2004 40.16...
30.30.5036.1 DlB lLC 249.62 145.54 104.08 10101/2004 67.09 ...
30.30.5026.1 DLB Ll...C 248.47 111.70 89.04 47.73 10/01/2004 40.11 -
24.03.0710.2 DOBARAN, JOHN 22.62 11.31 11.31 09/21/2004 11.31 -
24.04.1588.3 DONALDSON, NEAL & DONNA 118.66 50.56 68.10 08/27/2004 191.08...
30.30.5012.2 DREWES, ZINA 49.79 46.96 2.83 08/25/2004 56.66 ...
30.30.5014.2 DREWES, ZINA 93.90 49.90 44.00 10/18/2004 100.00 -
24.04.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 152.75 82.13 70.62 10/20/2004 112.38 ...
20.47.0010.3 DRUSSEL, KIM 101.22 49.46 51.76 09/2112004 49.80 -
23.02.6970.1 DUlHANTY, TAMARA 145.28 83.06 62.22 10/21/2004 107.90 -
32.32.4224.1 DUMMAR, ANDREW & JENNIFEF 233.48 116.36 117.12 10/20/2004 86.14 -
25.25.1060.3 DUNSWORTH, BRAD & JODI 83.49 41.83 41.66 10/05/2004 40.00 -
24.04.1958.1 DUPLEX, KENNETH & DONNA 155.09 69.77 85.32 11/0212004 134.92 -
36.68.0102.2 DURHAM, KYLE 76.67 37.91 38.76 09/20/2004 76.54 -
20.46.0854.1 DURRANT, ALAN C 230.21 125.73 104.48 10/18/2004 119.18-
24.04.0886.1 DUVALL, DEBORAH 69.75 34.31 35.44 10/05/2004 34.00 ...
22.50.2006.1 DWYER, GERDA 54.18 53.20 .98 10/19/2004 42.39 -
23.02.5010.1 EARLEY, GEORGE 64.28 35.40 28.88 11/0212004 30.84...
25.05.0172.1 EARNHART,KATHlEEN 130.85 76.57 54.28 10/20/2004 68.00 -
23.02.4980.2 EDDINGTON, JERRY 92.40 48.48 43.92 09/1612004 102.54 ...
30.74.3678.2 EDWARDS, DEARL W 84.51 41.83 42.68 10/2212004 41.70...
24.04.1646.2 EGBERT, DOUGLAS & CARLEE~ 101.42 65.19 36.23
30.74.3284.1 EI.D, ROBBIN 90.89 43.63 45.46 1.80 09/29/2004 49.38 -
30.74.2368.1 ELDRED, FLOYD 61.69 37.09 24.60 11/0212004 65.00 -
37.72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO 308.94 72.08 71.10 85.80 77.96 09/2212004 54.44 ...
36.68.0138.1 ELLINGTON, BRUCE 95.95 46.57 49.38 10/19/2004 49.38 ...
37.37.3258.3 ENGLAND, PAUL & TRACY 84.02 42.06 41.96 1010512004 32.61 ...
25.25.0012.2 ENGLUND, WILL & SHIRLEY 60.04 57.10 2.94 09/17/2004 59.94 ...
22.50.1242.3 ERHART, MILT 91.91 50,21 41.70 09/10/2004 49.72 -
22.50.1230.2 ERHART, MILTON 100.53 61.71 34.18 4.64 10/08/2004 35.00 -
23.02.3464.1 ERICKSON, RICHARD 105.60 51.38 54.22 10/19/2004 51.28 -
30.74.3796.2 ESPEY, MATTHEW & ANDREA 63.11 43.63 19.48 10/26/2004 25 .00 ...
22.51.3080.2 ESQUIVEL, ROSE 97.72 54.22 43.50 10/05/2004 43.50 -
22.50.1354.4 ESTATE OF BESSIE MATCHAM 73.76 39.16 34.60 10/13/2004 31 .66 -
23.02.6380.3 ESTEP, COURTNEY & SCOTT, J. 148.72 92.48 56.24 10115/2004 60.00 -
23.02.0320.1 ESTEP, NINA 50.16 39.32 10.84 11/0212004 20.00 -
32.32.4386.2 EVANS, DANIEL, RHONDA 85.00 43.04 41.96 11109/2004 41.96 ...
22.50.3822.1 EVANS, M. SHAE 88.14 48.80 39.34 09/27/2004 39.34 -
30.74.2688.1 EVANS, STEVEN & KRISITE 162.64 74.02 88.62 10/20/2004 97.44 -
20.46.0132.3 EVANS, SUSAN 141.95 51.03 46.44 44.48 0910212004 41.54 -
30.74.2754.1 EVERMAN, DAVID 73.15 72.87 .28 11/08/2004 80.48 -
24.04.1940.2 EXNER, VERNON & ELIZABETH 51.18 51.04 .14 10/19/2004 187.00 -
30.74.3614.1 FACKRELL, THOMAS 94.63 33.33 61.30 11/03/2004 40.00 -
23.02.2060.1 FARMER, SCOTT 105.75 55.39 50.36 10/19/2004 52.32 -
23.02.2450.1 FARRELL, MICHAEL 97.42 47.78 49.64 09/1712004 50.62-
37.37.5036.2 FARRIS, WESTON & JOYCE 85.98 43.04 42.94 09/21/2004 44.90 -
22.50.4812.2 FARROW, GREGORY & CAROL I 126.72 62.70 64.02 09/21/2004 133.92 -
30.74.3670.2 FAULKNER, MICHAEL 65.38 32.74 32.64 09/1412004 46.36 ...
22.50.0290.5 FIELDSTAD, CHRISTY 50.52 40.64 9.88
30.74.2568.2 FINLEY. JEFFREY 48.72 32.24 16.48 10/08/2004 130,72 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
30.74.3190.3 FISHCHER, DONALD & LAURA 101.02 49.58 51.44 10/18/2004 66.14 -
30.74.1006.1 FISHEL, GEORGE 259.64 122.15 137.49 10/20/2004 120.83 -
30.74.3354.1 FLOREZ, BARRY 68.49 34.31 34.18 09/21/2004 71.30 -
23.02.1660.3 FLYNN. MELANIE 107.71 53.43 54.28 10/14/2004 60.16 -
35.65.0790.2 FOREST, JOHN & REGINA 138.11 55.78 70.38 11.95
36.69.0738.1 FORGY, MICHAEL 165.17 88.83 76.34 10/20f2004 78.30 -
25.05.0438.1 FORRESTER,VANDYE 136.4 7 66.83 69.64 09/17/2004 92.18 -
35.35.1414.3 FOX. ERICK 70.94 35.52 35.42 09f21/2004 34.82 -
22.50.3712.2 FRANCISCO C. MATHEOUS 45.56 45.56 11/15/2004 53.40 -
24.04.1162.3 FRANKS. JAMES & JORITA 105.60 51.92 52.72 .96 10/18/2004 50.00 -
36.68.0142.1 FRAZEE, ANGIE 88.57 43.63 44.94 10/19/2004 45.00 -
23.01.1200.2 FRED SCHIMPH 160.38 74.14 86.24 10/19f2004 85.26 -
36.68.0290.2 FREEMAN, CRAIG 90.07 44.61 45.46 10/19/2004 45.46 -
22.51.3078.3 FREEMAN. NICOLE 68.30 38.04 30.26 09/21/2004 64.44 -
24.04.1708.2 FREINWALD. CLAY JR 113.74 46.14 67.60 09f20/2004 127.36 -
30.74.2746.1 FRENCH, JOHN & KATHY 66.68 29.96 36.72 09f17/2004 121.46 -
20.46.0240.2 FRENCH. KATHY & MILES. WILL 118.77 65.89 52.88 10/13/2004 43.00 -
32.32.4406.2 FRESHWATER, MICHELLE 47.89 23.03 24.86 09/17/2004 23.88 -
23.01.0832.1 FRIENDS OF CHILDREN & FAMtI 80.92 43.23 15.07 11.31 11.31 07/13/2004 67.74 -
23.01.0831.1 FRIENDS OF CHILDREN & FAMII 307.38 55.42 125.00 126.96 09/14f2004 146.56 -
37.72.0210.1 FRITZMEIER. RANDY 139.18 59.26 79.92 10/1 9/2004 75.00 -
22.50.1232.2 FRONCONE, JOSHUA 106.40 35.24 28.72 42.44 09/21/2004 34.60 -
30.74.3232.1 FROST JR, ARCHIE 57.08 56.10 .98 10/05/2004 35.42 -
20.46.0262.2 GABRIEL. RON & MARILYN 93.55 50.05 43.50 09f17/2004 81.96 -
30.74.2710.1 GAILEY, BRON 127.31 44.77 77.58 4.96 09/22/2004 100.00 -
24.04.1330.2 GALE, HOWARD 89.62 30.78 32.64 26.20 . 06/24/2004 70.32 -
23.02.6630.1 GALVAN. STEVEN 69.97 69.81 .16 1 0/14/2004 68.00 -
36.69.0234.1 GAMBOA. PAUL 91.56 45.98 45.58 10/19/2004 45.00 -
22.50.1996.2 GARCIA, CHRISSY 80.01 46.68 33.33 11/lOf2004 30.00 -
24.03.0112.2 GARCIA, JEFFRIE 104.80 54.80 50.00 11/02/2004 62.52 -
25.25.9882.2 GARCIA, JOSEFINA 100.54 43.04 41.96 15.54
22.50.0132.2 GARIDEL, TROY 76.70 44.06 32.64 10/05/2004 33.62 -
30.74.0706.1 GARY, FRANK 47.78 42.88 4.90 09f15/2004 48.66 -
24.04.1430.2 GAYMON, GREG & ALISON 185.53 85.79 99.74 10/05/2004 100.00 -
23.02.0950.1 GAYTHIWAITE, RITCHIE & SUSI! 115.43 60.99 54.44 10/19/2004 73.06 -
37.72.0280.1 GElS, ADAM 83.53 41.83 41.70 10/13/2004 44.64 -
30.30.0001.1 GENESIS CENTER LLC 592.12 70.12 76.98 262.20 182.82
30.30.0002.1 GENESIS CENTER, LLC 566.46 159.28 158.37 86.41 162.40
30.74.3078.2 GENTSCH, NOREEN 136.70 46.80 46.70 43.20 09/21 f2004 60.00 -
35.35.1448.2 GIBBS, CINDY 81.94 37.32 39.18 5.44 08/27 f2004 40.00 -
23.02.2578.2 GINGRICK, KENT 115.87 54.57 61.30 10/19/2004 67.18 -
30.30.6042.2 GLASS, ANNETTE 72.55 30.78 32.64 9.13 09f21/2004 60.00 -
24.03.0844.1 GODFREY, SHELLI 131.11 43.79 42.68 44.64 08f17/2004 79.02 -
23.01.0150.2 GOLDEN. LEROY 87.28 31.48 29.86 25.94 09/02/2004 28.88 -
23.01.2390.2 GONZALEZ. HARVEY 145.92 93.18 52.74 10/20/2004 60.58 -
23.01.2090.1 GOSSEN, KELLI 105.40 37.52 32.96 34.92 09/21/2004 62.98 -
30.30.6010.2 GOULD, TRAVIS & AMANDA 113.95 38.07 37.94 37.94 08/18/2004 75.88 -
22.50.3916.1 GOVREAU. AMY 85.86 44.72 41.14 09/14/2004 80.32 -
22.20.0096.3 GRAHAM. FRANK 81.58 46.52 35.06
46.46.6220.1 GRAVES, KEEGAN & KATHY 68.98 40.10 28.88 09/21/2004 80.32 -
30.74.3656.2 GRAY, LAURA & MAURY 76.80 26.04 26.92 23.84 08/24/2004 30.00 -
22.51.4090.5 GRAY, LORELEE 106.39 40.64 37.06 28.69
24.04.2352.1 GREAT CLIPS 45.18 18.83 26.35 10/04/2004 18.83 -
24.04.1146.2 GREEN LANCE & GLORIA 73.88 36.50 37.38 10/19/2004 37.14 -
22.50.2242.1 GREEN, JUDITH 111.85 60.67 51.18 10/13/2004 57.06 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
t" (
,
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 7
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 11/2012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/2012004 Date Amount
37.72.0212.1 GREEN. JUSTIN 157.74 63.04 44.90 49.80 09/07/2004 52.74 -
24.04.1206.1 GREEN, KEVIN 76.99 38.07 38.92 10/19/2004 75.88 -
20.46.0190.1 GRIST, JIMMIE 109.89 58.71 51.18 10/19/2004 54.12 -
24.04.2276.2 GROAT, DARLA 253.17 253.17 04/16/2004 102.68 -
30.30.6338.2 GROSS, BRANDON & L YNSA Y 82.06 41.08 40.98 09/1512004 40.00 -
30.74.3176.3 GROSSL, EDNA 123.73 47.39 76.34 09/22/2004 107.00 -
23.02.4290.1 GROSSO, SHADOW 61.76 30.66 31.10 11/1 0/2004 25.00 -
24.03.0034.1 GROUND, JENNIFER 79.93 40.03 39.90 09/2112004 93.62-
30.74.2990.1 GROVE. GREGORY E 110.67 54.91 55.76 10101/2004 56]4 -
36.69.0206.3 GROVES. CRAIG 151.93 86.03 65.90 10/1912004 66.88 -
24.04.2184.2 GROVES, NANCY & DARRELL 122.24 52.84 69.40 10/19/2004 80.18 -
25.25.0126.2 GROW-GRAY, DANIELE 74.00 36.50 37.50 11/02/2004 50.00 -
46.46.7034.1 GUARANTEED QUAIUTY HOME: 44.93 25.22 12.89 4.46 2.36
32.32.4134.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 25.56 19.16 3.48 2.92
32.32.4644.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 22.78 15.40 4.46 2.92
37.37.5030.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 6.03 3.48 2.55
30.74.2382.4 GULL, SCOTT 123.00 61.38 61.62 10/15/2004 85.14 -
20.46.0370.1 GUMMERSALL, RICHARD 90.93 50.21 40.72 10/08/2004 41.70 -
20.47.0066.1 GUNDERSON, LEE 178.23 95.33 82.90 11/01/2004 89.76 -
22.50.2378.1 GUTHMILLER, BRIAN A 202.34 114.38 87.96 10/1912004 150.00 -
32.32.4910.2 GUTHRIE, GERDA 49.39 37.16 12.23 10/15/2004 38.04 -
24.04.1620] GUYMON, GREG & ALISON 131.62 51.20 80.42 10/19/2004 90.00 -
33.33.0004.1 H A ANDERSEN 22.20 8.38 7.40 6.42 08/2512004 9.90 -
22.50.0286.1 HACKNEY, KATIE 81.28 42.92 38.36 10/26/2004 49.14.
29.07.0896.3 HAFER, RUSSELL 101.51 50.33 51.18 09114/2004 102.36 -
25.25.0118.2 HAGEN, PHILIP 60.14 30.12 30.02 10/12/2004 37.86 -
29.07.0992.1 HAGERMAN,DEAN 63.42 30.78 32.64 10105/2004 36.56 -
37.72.0186.2 HAISLIP, SUZY 174.41 108.49 65.92 10/21/2004 90.00 -
24.04.1296.3 HALES, SCOTT & AMANDA 119.69 59.65 60.04 10119/2004 59.00 -
22.50.1512.1 HALL, LEO 114.76 55.57 59.19 10104/2004 80.75 -
24.04.0694.2 HALL. PAMELA & GLEN 68.58 43.20 25.38 10113/2004 50.00 -
30.74.1052.2 HAMILTON, JACQUELYN 101.94 33.72 35.58 32.64 08117/2004 71.16 -
23.02.5150.2 HAMMACK, CHRIS & LAURA 131.22 84.36 46.86 10/2012004 59.60 -
24.04.1790.3 HAMMER, MARCIE 161.15 161.15 05/0512004 10.00 -
20.46.0434.2 HAMMONS, CURTIS & CARLA 134.11 49.07 42.52 42.52 08113/2004 84.48 -
20.47.0002.3 HANNUM, ELLEN & PAUL 102.37 53.97 45.46 2.94 1012812004 45.46 -
30.74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 160.08 92.64 67.44 10/20/2004 73.32 -
23.02.1530.3 HARPER, JAIME 101.34 51.70 49.64 10/05/2004 55.52.
37.72.0158.1 HARRIS, CINDI 76.07 75.33 .74 11/1012004 79.00 -
36.69.0578.1 HARRIS. DEBORAH 239.13 117.67 121.46 10/1812004 135.18-
24.04.0512.3 HARRIS, KATHY 86.39 43.63 42.76 11/01/2004 45.00-
22.51.0378.1 HARRY'S BAR & GRILL 795.90 391.57 404.33 10/19/2004 374.25 -
24.04.0576.1 HART KRISTOFER 77.80 40.42 37.38 10/12/2004 41.30 -
25.05.0506.1 HART,RANDY 242.66 85.86 156.80 09/22/2004 322.20 .
23.02.5900.1 HARVEY. LISA M. 141.52 79.20 62.32 10/1812004 50.00.
36.69.1318.1 HAUN, CORY 152.45 62.57 89.88 09/1612004 206.22 -
22.50.2112.2 HAY, CHARLES & ROBERTA 130.65 43.67 38.10 48.88 09121/2004 43.00 .
22.50.2372.5 HAYCOCK, VANESSA 126.00 80.28 45.72 10/20/2004 90.42 -
24.04.1212.1 HAYLETT, MIKE 115.25 59.65 55.60 10/19/2004 55.60 -
24.04.0566.2 HEILLER, JAMES 49.36 24.24 25.12 09/30/2004 48.28 .
23.01.2420.1 HENDRICKS. BARBARA 84.22 44.88 39.34 10/2012004 48.16 -
30.74.3356.2 HENDRIKSE, EDITH 90.88 43.04 47.84 10113/2004 49.80 -
23.02.0898.1 HEPPER, TED 217.64 117.02 100.62 10105/2004 104.54 -
21.21.9118.3 HERMANSON, BRYAN & KARl 131.17 36.37 30.93 63.87 08118/2004 110.53 -
21.21.9114.1 HERMANSON, BRYAN & KARl 139.18 45.03 30.11 30.11 33.93 05114/2004 11.31 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
f
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 8
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 11120/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
25.05.0220.1 HESSING, WilLIAM 248.70 131.58 117,14 10/2012004 105.38 -
22.51.3580.1 HIGGINBOTHAM, RON 211.64 100.26 111.38 10/19/2004 140.40 -
22.50.4638.2 HIGHLAND DEVELOPMENT LLC 73.06 63.18 9.88
22.50.4594.3 HINSHAW. TONY & KATHY 85.45 42.60 38.04 4.81 10/22/2004 38.04 -
30.30.6032.2 HINSZ. l YNETTE 58.84 29.96 28.88 09/21/2004 58.62 -
22.50.4810.2 HIX. MICHAEL 107.82 53.70 54.12 10/19/2004 70.00 -
35.35.0221.2 HOAlST, JODI 164.57 69.61 94.96 09107/2004 157.58 -
36.36.0174.2 HOBBS, RANDY & SANDRA 87.13 42.65 44.48 10/20/2004 43.50 -
36.69.0736.3 HOCKETT, DAVID & BARBARA 91.35 39.37 51.98 10/12/2004 55.90 -
35.65.0630.2 HOFFERBER, EDWARD 77.97 38.07 39.90 10/08/2004 39.90 -
20.46.0356.1 HOLDRIDGE, JOANNE 109.72 59.10 50.62 11/10/2004 45.72 -
25.05.0722.2 HOLLEY, ANNA 225,42 101.51 123.91 10/19/2004 187.29 -
36.69.0720.1 HOLLIBAUGH, DAVID & LYNN 52.58 52.18 .40 11/01/2004 59.52 -
30.74.1014.3 HOLLOWAY, JERALD K 82.38 41.24 41.14 10/19/2004 45.06 .
22.50.3840.1 HOLZHEIMER, AMY 81.66 45.88 35.80 10/15/2004 37.00 -
24.03.0362.1 HONO, GREG & NANCY 155.61 95.13 60A8 10/20/2004 150.00 -
30.30.6096.2 HOPPE MIYAKE. BRENDA 75.03 37.09 37.94 10/08/2004 38.92 -
30.74.3966.1 HOSAC, JAMES 65.55 43.04 22.51 10/25/2004 92.74 -
32.55.1560.1 HOTEL DEVELOPERS-BOISE. Ll 2,274.75 930.42 940.21 404.12 10/19/2004 940.21 -
30.30.6128.2 HOUDE, RICHARD & CATHRYN 69.96 35.52 34.44 11/03/2004 31.82 -
30.74.2644.1 HOUSE, SHARON 125.65 70.73 54.92 10/01/2004 81.38 -
23.02.3000.1 HOUSTON, TONY & THERESA 94.20 45.00 45.88 3.32 09/23/2004 70.00 -
38.69.1276.2 HOWARD, DONALD & CAROLYN 95.68 95.68 04/21/2004 35.32 -
23.01.0420.1 HOWARD, TREVIS 118.06 101.98 16.08 10/20/2004 80.00 -
30.74.3538.2 HOWE, RICHARD & LAUREN 114.27 44.61 45.46 24.20 08/18/2004 69.70 -
23.02.0934.2 HOWELL. ROGER & LISA 139.01 49.07 42.52 47,42 08/17/2004 48.40 -
35.65,0704.2 HUBBARD. SCOTT & ERICA 43.04 40.26 2.78 10/29/2004 18.80 -
36.68.0154.1 HUCK, MATTHEW 90.22 48.10 42.12 09/22/2004 43.10 -
35.65.0708.1 HUDDLESTON,CODY 178.33 71.91 74.72 31.70 09/20/2004 150.00 -
36.69.0562.1 HUFF. HARLAN & SAUNDRA 86.38 35.84 50.44 .10 10/12/2004 17.54 -
30.74.3436.2 HUMPHREYS. JASON & CHRIST 131.02 80.58 50,46 10/20/2004 52,42 -
22.51.0714.2 HUMPHREYS. JOHN 113,48 34.42 48.88 30.18 09/21/2004 70.00 -
36.69.1270.1 HUNT, THOMAS 240.84 75.88 164.96 10/19/2004 158.10-
32.32.4902.2 HUNTLEY, TERRIE 68.32 35.68 32.64 09/15/2004 69.20-
36.69.0747.1 HUNTS BLUFF HOMEOWNERS! 126.28 12.30 11.32 19.16 83.50 03/22/2004 6.42-
36.69.0926.2 HUNTTING, DENNIS & RANAE 1,281.02 94.00 351.26 835.76 09/22/2004 74.30 .
29.07.1064.1 HYMAS, ARRON 135.49 69.05 66.44 10/20/2004 71.52 -
20.47.0064.1 HYONG, PAK 99.16 27.72 23.18 23.16 25.12 07/21/2004 24.14 -
31.52.6306.1 IDAHO SOCCER CENTER INC 262.82 139.53 120.15 3.14
23.01.0850.1 IRENE NOlTA 112.25 56.14 56.11 10/18/2004 65.91 -
23.02.0444.1 IRISH, STACIE 82.04 37.64 44.40 10/1812004 65.96 -
22.51.4233.1 J.B. CRESTO 70.22 34.40 35.82 09/21/2004 34.84 -
22.51 ,4234.1 J.B. REAL ESTATE 152.99 77.86 75.13 09/21/2004 71.37 -
20.46.4618.1 JACKSON FOOD STORES, INC. 668.72 342.13 326.59 09/15/2004 453.90 -
36.65.3112.1 JACOBS, MARIE 65.38 31.76 33.62 10/19/2004 66.26 -
36.68.0046.1 JACOBSEN, JASON & LIANNA 97.57 35.29 62.28 10/19/2004 40.00 -
22.50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 47.30 30.50 18.80 09/14/2004 48.48 -
23.23.3012.2 JAEGER,KEVIN & CLAY, TINA 124.64 40.96 35.42 35.42 12.84 09/21/2004 23.00-
35.35.0112.2 JARDINE, JEFFREY 71.56 37.32 34.24 10119/2004 32.86 -
24.04.1454.1 JEANNIE LETHO 101.51 49.35 52.16 10119/2004 57.08 -
22.51.0302.7 JEPSON. MIKE & JAMIE 53.22 45.86 7.36 10/21/2004 70.00 -
30.74.2532.2 JERYLE MILLER 143.05 81.63 61.42 10/27/2004 70.00 -
32.32.4830.1 JEWETT, JAMES L 144.26 77.86 66,40 09/23/2004 78.56 .
30.74.3842.2 JOHNSON. KEVIN 99.19 49.35 49.22 .62 09/21/2004 98.00 -
23.01.2710.2 JOHNSON, MARC 138.26 44.88 44.24 49.14 09/22/2004 89.46 -
... In Msg colu mn indicates no Notice is to be sent
, /
i \
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 1112012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinqueot Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeJinq 09/20/2004 08120/2004 07/20/2004 Dale Amount
29.07.0886.3 JOHNSON, ROGER & HOLLY 107.65 68.89 38.76 10121/2004 67.78 -
20.47.0068.2 JOHNSON, RONALD & APRIL 127.67 43.19 42.52 41.96 08/16/2004 40.00 -
23.02.1880.1 JOHNSON,STEVEN 67.27 35.45 31.82 09114/2004 35.74 -
37.37.3504.1 JOHNSON,TROY & MELISSA 90.07 45.59 44.48 09/21/2004 45.46 -
36.69.0310.1 JOHNSTON, DENISE 69.91 54.91 15.00 1110212004 71.74 -
36.69.0912.2 JOHNSTON, GLEN & TIMI 91.37 47.71 43.66 10/19/2004 47.58 -
30.30.6024.2 JOKI, SARAH 57.74 28.98 28.76 09/21/2004 29.00 -
20.47.1036.2 JONES, FAROL 86.32 50.44 35.88 11/0212004 80.00 -
24.04.1138.2 JONES, NATHAN & SARAH 126.29 31.53 61.40 33.36 09/2212004 65.74 -
22.50.2354.1 JONES, OWEN 78.06 51.80 26.26 09/20/2004 25.28 -
22.50.2122.2 JONES, WES & CINDY 105.42 40.14 32.64 32.64 08/27/2004 68.22 -
23.02.4440.1 JORDAN, RONALD E. 92.38 47.00 45.38 09/29/2004 49.30 -
34.34.6090.1 JORDON, STEVE & MONICA 83.07 42.06 29.82 8.38 2.81
23.01.0940.8 JOSLEYN, WAYNE & ELIZABET~ 118.52 68.40 50.12 10/1912004 53.06 -
20.46.0840.4 JUDY, VICTOR 114.11 36.97 31.40 45.74 09/21/2004 50.00 -
20.46.0802.4 JUDY, VICTOR 89.18 44.94 43.24 1.00 0912212004 92.20 -
24.04.0530.3 KALEY, JERRY 113.46 55.84 57.62 10/05/2004 53.70 -
35.35.1460.2 KAMCHATHPHAY, C & BOUAlA\ 99.55 48.37 51.18 10/0412004 48.24 -
36.69.0780.1 KELLEY, GERRI 94.14 46.14 48.00 10/19/2004 60.74 -
30.74.0316.1 KELLY, KENDALL 8 109.00 72.06 36.94 11115/2004 35.00 -
24.04.1886.3 KELTON, RANDY & ROBERT 211.45 24.26 28.34 25.43 133.42 07/20/2004 65.24 -
32.32.4048.2 KESNER, AMY 77.31 39.21 38.10 09/16/2004 67.38 -
22.50.2364.1 KING, KELLY R. 69.84 37.20 31.66 .98 10/1412004 31.66 -
25.05.0744.2 KLEINFELDT, DAVID & MARY JC 154.58 68.52 86.06 09/21/2004 79.20 -
22.51.3570.4 KNOX, JERRY & NORMA 353.88 71.04 61.58 64.52 156.74 07/19/2004 50.00 -
22.50.1918.1 KORB, KARA 80.17 44.49 35.68 10119/2004 50.00 -
24.04.2262.1 I<REEGAR, KRISTOPHER 64.45 62.41 2.04 11/08/2004 88.00 -
20.46.0852.1 KRISHNEK, JOHN 89.46 89.46 0311112004 31.40 -
22.50.4642.3 KUGEL, LISA 98.95 92.27 6.68 11/15/2004 91.00 -
20.46.0368.2 KUPER,GREG 88.31 49.39 38.92 10/08/2004 34.80 -
23.23.3452.3 KURTIC, ZLATKO & NAFKA 68.29 43.58 24.71
32.32.4036.2 KYLE, GEORGE 41.10 41.08 .02 10/22/2004 42.92 -
22.50.1750.1 LACY, MEL 109.09 38.77 36.14 34.18 09/21/2004 37.12 -
37.37.2964.2 LAKATOS, JOSHEPH & LORA 98.57 50.33 48.24 1010512004 80.20 -
35.35.0144.3 LAMASTERS,TERRENCE 79.44 40.26 39.18 10/19/2004 40.16 -
22.50.4268.2 LANHAM, PATRICE 110.87 59.69 51.18 09121/2004 103.48 -
22.51.1317.1 LANPHEAR LLC 534.84 191.20 156.36 110.30 76.98 08/0312004 124.46 -
22.51.1318.2 LANPHEAR PROPERTIES LLC 223.38 76.88 146.50
23.02.4490.2 LARSON, LEIF 128.90 72.34 56.56 1012212004 45.00 -
35.65.0260.2 LARSON, WADE & LAURI 143.22 58.94 84.28 09/2212004 129.14 -
22.50.0520.2 LAURICELLA, CARL & LAURIE 80.30 43.90 36.40 09121/2004 71 .82 -
35.35.0401.3 LAVARELLO, MIGUEL & BRANDI 77.97 39.05 38.92 09/21/2004 8.92 -
24.04.2080.2 LAVIGNE, SEAN & AUDRIENNE 101 .49 47.87 53.62 10/05/2004 70.28 -
32.32.4174.2 LAWSON, JAMES & BONNIE 85.49 42.81 42.68 10105/2004 42.68 -
22.50.0600.2 LAYTON, JONATHON & FELlCJT 73.76 41.12 32.64 09/2912004 31.66 -
36.69.0936.1 LEIBY, TROY 140.56 66.90 73.66 10/1212004 83.46 -
22.50.2428.1 LEONARD, DAMON 120.35 64.43 55.92 10119/2004 77.32 -
23.02.3530.2 LEWIS, BRADLEY & JACQUELIN 121.16 66.78 54.38 10/19/2004 59.28 -
23.01.3250.2 LIDDELL, JOSH & SARA 126.48 79.26 47.22 10115/2004 79.82 -
23.02.5050.3 LIDDELL, JOSH & SARA 176.09 90.83 85.26 10/21/2004 76.82 -
24.03.0386.2 LIGHTFOOT, LANCE S. 136.76 44.02 44.90 47.84 08/24/2004 20.32 -
22.50.2130.1 llKES, JENNIFER 106.00 53.22 52.58 .20 10/19/2004 52.00 -
29.07.0772.2 LINCOLN, CHARLES 142.16 85.68 56.48 10/2012004 54.52 -
23.02.6260.2 LINDAUER, BILL 63.30 33.44 29.86 09/17/2004 34.76 -
30.30.6056.2 LINDER, MARK & CHRISTINA 121.81 40.69 40.56 40.56 09/21/2004 81.12-
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
i
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10
Standard Payment Customers Noy 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 1112012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Gust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 0912012004 08/2012004 0712012004 Date Amount
30.74.3218.3 LINDSEY, STEPHANIE 44.87 42.81 2.06 1111012004 75.00 -
36.69.1538.1 LOIS, LOUIS J. 67.51 34.31 33.20 09129/2004 35.16 -
35.35.0070.2 LONG, JACK & L YANE 85.98 43.04 42.94 09/27/2004 43.92 -
36.69.0292.1 LOWMAN, TODD 109.03 56.05 52.98 10/05/2004 58.86 -
30.74.2320.1 LUTZ, R. KELLY 93.01 45.59 47.42 10/19/2004 52.32 -
23.02.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 168.99 48.41 72.84 47.74 0912212004 72.24 -
23.02.1410.1 MADSEN, JOHN 139.52 83.34 56.18 10/20/2004 54.22 -
22.50.1686.5 MAHATHY, ANTHONY 102.87 52.51 50.36 10/08/2004 145.00 -
24.03.0812.3 MAIN, LOUIS & DENISE 71.92 35.52 36.40 10/01/2004 35.78 -
34.34.6210.1 MALLON CONSTRUCTION 4.52 3.48 1.04
30.74.3618.3 MALOY, JAMES & HARKINS, RO 148.17 59.87 41.70 46.60 09/17/2004 53.46 -
30.74.0394.3 MANTHA, TRAVIS & APRIL 78.82 40.10 38.72 10/19/2004 55.00 -
23.02.1510.1 MANWARING, MARK 99.66 65.68 33.98 10/28/2004 76.00.
24.03.0056.2 MARCHANT, KIMBERLY 73.39 34.31 39.08 11/10/2004 43.00 .
24.03.0806.4 MARCUM, CARL & JULIE 43.36 41.08 2.28 10/19/2004 40.00 -
23.02.5940.1 MARINEAU, SHIRLEY 86.18 44.88 41.30 10/19/2004 60.90 .
29.07.0900.2 MARK WOOD 137.73 53.93 83.80 10/19/2004 54.78 -
24.03.0396.2 MARKAR DESIGN 119.81 57.03 62.78 10/26/2004 84.34 -
21.48.1990.2 MARKAR DESIGN & CONSTRUC 9.90 7.94 1.96 10115/2004 6.42-
36.69.0156.3 MARQUIS, RON & SANDRA 52.52 45.82 6.70 10108/2004 53.56 .
35.35.1046.2 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 83.53 40.85 42.68 09/2112004 42.32 .
23.02.2520.3 MARTIN. CRAIG 132.34 43.20 42.12 47.02 08/23/2004 49.96 -
25.25.0136.2 MARTIN. DAVID & SHERRIE 111.97 55.07 56.90 10119/2004 89.84 -
35.35.1170.2 MARTINEZ, LUIS & VERONICA 80.23 40.85 39.38 10/19/2004 45.00 -
35.64.0020.2 MARTINEZ, RON 105.38 35.52 34.44 35.42 08/23/2004 76.72 .
23.02.2280.1 MASLEN, JENNY 77.80 38.46 39.34 10/1912004 55.88 .
22.50.3704.2 MATA, FREDIE 101.26 75.28 25.98 10/26/2004 50.00.
22.50.3714.3 MA TEESCU, ROXANA 196.45 109.83 86.62 0911712004 92.50 .
22.51.4040.1 MATLOCK, JAMES 53.09 29.50 23.59 09/27/2004 22.61 -
24.04.1626.1 MAXEY, SHANE & MICHELLE 177.27 84.41 92.86 10120/2004 95.00 -
30.74.2902.4 MCBAINE. DONALD 87.45 43.79 43.66 10/0712004 43.66 -
30.30.6110.2 MCCAULEY, BRIAN 85.98 42.06 43.92 10/15/2004 51.72 -
35.35.0095.1 MCCLAFLIN, SCOTT 72.90 36.50 36.40 09/20/2004 35.42 .
23.02.0450.2 MCCLURE, BRENT 138.51 77.85 60.66 09/01/2004 193.38 -
22.50.0252.1 MCCLURE, DOYLE 45.07 45.04 .03 10/14/2004 35.55 .
30.30.6276.2 MCCOID, JAY & MONICA 79.12 39.12 40.00 10/0512004 40.00 -
22.50.3728.2 MCCOLLUM, SHAYNA 135.20 61.70 73.50 09/2212004 27.02 -
23.23.3494.2 MCCOY, MARGI 79.81 43.67 36.14 10/04/2004 36.14 -
36.69.0458.3 MCCREARY, EARL 141.75 67.97 73.78 09130/2004 95.00 -
24.04.1880.1 MCCUE, DENNIS & RHONDA 97.25 45.75 51.50 10120/2004 57.38 -
23.01.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 100.73 50.21 50.52 09/1712004 44.64 -
37.37.2948.2 MCDANIEL, MARTIN & LOIS 122.03 41.83 39.74 40.46 07/19/2004 38.76 -
24.04.1698.1 MCDONALD, TONY & TRUDY 114.59 56.87 57.72 10/01/2004 79.28 -
22.50.0400.3 MCFADDEN, CLEORA 86.84 38.84 48.00 09/27/2004 113.64 "
23.01.0090.2 MCFADDEN, CLEORA 103.99 49.39 54.60 10/19/2004 67.34 -
23.01.0080.1 MCFADDEN, CLEORA 106.93 58.21 48.72 09/2712004 111.16.
37.37.5010.1 MCFATE, DAVID E. 87.85 57.85 30.00 11/10/2004 42.92 -
24.03.0078.2 MCGINLEY, LOUIS & JULIA 65.53 42.06 23.47
30.30.6086.2 MCGINNIS, JACOB & REBECCA 91.43 55.29 36.14 10129/2004 37.12 -
25.05.0446.1 MCGRATH, MICHAEL 79.10 74.90 4.20 11/10/2004 100.00 -
30.74.3106.2 MCGUIRE, JOSEFH AND SARAI- 77.48 38.30 39.18 10/28/2004 47.08 -
22.51.3246.1 MCKAGUE, RICK 67.32 45.63 21.69 10/13/2004 90.00 -
36.36.0986.1 MCKINLEY, DENNIS 31.76 30.78 .98 10/1212004 32.64 .
24.04.1798.2 MCKINLEY, JAMES A 110.19 77.21 32.98 10121/2004 100.00 -
30.74.1046.1 MCKINLEY. JUNE 162.08 73.99 25.45 28.39 34.25 07/15/2004 47.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
,
I
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 11120/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
last Pmt last Pm!
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08120/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
24.03.0504.4 MCKINLEY, JUNE 98.86 48.53 50.33 10/19/2004 00.19 -
23.02.4870.4 MCKINLEY, JUNE 135.67 73.32 62.35 10/19/2004 65.00 -
20.46.0558.2 MCKNIGHT, DANIEL 118.80 48.64 70.16 09122/2004 138.74 -
22.50.2126.1 MCMAHAN, BRIAN 91.74 49.62 42.12 10/19/2004 69.30 -
23.02.3892.1 MCNAllEY, RUSSEll 88.45 49.23 39.22 10/15/2004 60.00 -
23.02.5590.1 MEDENA, RAYMOND 78.45 42.85 35.60 10/1912004 37.00-
20.47.1084.2 MEISTER, DAVID & KIM, HAE SC 104.33 57.89 46.44 10108/2004 45.46 -
23.01.2730.1 MELLEN, ANGELA 183.69 78.65 105.04 10118/2004 117.78 -
24.04.2052.2 MENDENHAll, ALAN 150.87 54.41 96.46 09/2312004 164.00 -
35.35.0408.2 MENDIOLA, GREG & CYNTHIA 42.96 42.06 .90 10/14/2004 42.00 -
31,52.1080.1 MERIDIAN DAIRY QUEEN 692.63 298.61 394.02 09114/2004 394.02 -
31.52.1079.1 MERIDIAN DAIRY QUEEN 132.40 40.72 91.68 09/14/2004 121.08 -
23.02.0310.2 MERIDIAN FIRST BAPTIST CHUI 11.36 11.03 .33 10/19/2004 7.22 -
24.03.0700.1 MERIDIAN STORAGE 18.86 11.31 7.55 09/2112004 11.31 -
30.74.3790.1 MERRITHEW, ROBERT 118.75 40.03 39.90 38.82 10101/2004 40.00 -
46.46.7105.1 MESSINA VilLAGE - WATER FE, 6.96 3.48 3.48 11/10/2004 3.48-
30.74.3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & LISA 112.98 54.64 55.40 2.94 10/12/2004 62.26 -
22.50.3848.1 MEYERS, DAN 98.19 55.93 42.26 1011912004 50.00 -
30.74.1032.1 MICHAELSON, BRADl Y C. 85.00 43.04 41.96 10/1412004 42.94 -
22.50.4032.3 MICHAIlOFF, ERNEST 86.18 43.90 42.28 09127/2004 97.30 -
22.51.3210.1 MILLER. FRIEDA 69.62 23.96 22.34 23.32 08130/2004 25.28 -
30.74.3696.1 MIllER, GREGORY & ERICA 115.06 84.54 30.52 10/20/2004 65.00 -
20.46.0340.2 MilLER, MARK 98.28 53.38 44.90 10/2012004 45.88 -
22.50.2352.2 MillER, SARAH 116.24 69.32 46.92 10/2012004 52.86 -
35.35.0141.3 MINGAR, JOHN 120.02 37.32 36.24 41.14 5.32 08/24/2004 35.00 -
30.74.2896.3 MINTZ, KEILA & BRIAN 28.82 28.82 09/14/2004 37.94 -
23.02.5040.1 MITCHEll, BARRY D 112.17 53.97 58.20 10/13/2004 56.24 -
25.05.0636.2 MITCHELL, DARLA 391.19 53.97 116.18 221.04 09/2112004 209,28 -
20.47.1052.2 MJKIC, BORKA & RATKO 61.56 50.44 11.12
32.32.4300.2 MOHAN,ANANTHANARAYANAN 93.82 45.00 48.82 09114/2004 48.82 -
25.25.4006.3 MOLCHAN, ERIKA 89.57 44.02 41.96 3.59
23.01.3550.2 MONSON, ROBERT & FEDEROV 95.34 40.64 54.70
46.46.7062.2 MOODY, KEVIN & MIESJA 116.18 37.16 37.06 41.96 08/1712004 44,90 -
30.74,2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 102.41 65.29 37.12 10/2112004 53.78 -
24.04.1634.1 MOORE, RUSSELL C 194.46 33.22 45.86 46.84 68.54 08103/2004 100.00 -
22.51.4218.2 MOORTGAT, JIM 81.18 73.33 7.85
36.36.1132.1 MOOSE CREEK BUILDERS 31.25 17.70 10.07 3.48 08/26/2004 1.68.
23.02.2410.3 MORIN, GEORGE 80.42 26.36 24.30 29.76 08/24/2004 37.60 -
24.03.0889.1 MORNING GLORY #2 HOA 27.84 3.48 3.48 3.48 17.40
22.50.0748.4 MORRISON, MIKE 79.62 42.58 37.04 09/21/2004 71.14 -
22.50.0746.5 MORRISON, MIKE 99.56 50.10 49.46 10/01/2004 10.78 -
22.50.2356.1 MORRISON, SHEILA & JAMES 71.80 40.14 31.66 09/21/2004 34.60 -
23.01.0076.3 MOUSER, ADRIAN 141.18 53.04 43.58 44.56 09121/2004 49.02 -
23.02.6050.3 MOWLER, JAKE 68.94 52.40 16.54 10/2112004 50.00 -
35.65.0384.1 MUCK, JIM 81.57 39.87 41.70 10/13/2004 37.78 -
22.50.0786.2 MULLIGAN, JOHN 194.28 119.70 74.58 09/2712004 131.45-
22.51.0482.1 MURRAY, SONDRAMURRAY 136.50 67.10 69.40 10/14/2004 126.82 -
24.03.0670.1 MURRAY, WAYNE 95.78 45.00 50.78 10/19/2004 57.64 -
25.25.1104.2 MUSTAGOG, ALBERT 47.89 24.01 23.88 09/2212004 79,28 -
30.74.3654.3 NAGLE, GEORGE & JUDY 91.78 29.96 61.82 09/2212004 69.58 -
30.30.6346.2 NATIVIDAD, DENNIS 64.09 38.14 25.95
36.69.2302.1 NEAL, KEVIN & MICHELLE 87.45 43.79 43.66 1 0119/2004 42.68 -
37.37.3030.3 NEilSON, CHRIS & JILL 121.53 48.92 42.94 29.67
23.01.0110.2 NESBIT, RICHARD & BARBARA I 108.74 58.12 50.62 0912112004 58.46 -
22.51.4100.1 NESMITH BROTHERS TOWING 144.49 73.12 71.37 09/2712004 78,89 -
... in MS9 column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquen t Account List- council Page: 12
Standard Payment Customers Noy 16, 2004 05:00pm
Currenl Period: 11/2012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08120/2004 07120/2004 Date Amount
24.04.1446.2 NEWBERRY, PAULA 132.05 68.79 63.26 10/1912004 77.00 -
23.01.3200.1 NEWKIRK, MARYANN 51.20 27.88 23.32 0912112004 51.54 -
34.34.6082.2 NICKELL, TROY & NANCY 89.97 56.37 33.60
37.37.4214.2 NIELSEN, CLARK 93.01 46.57 46.44 09/1512004 107.42 -
30.74.0664.1 NIELSON, STEVE 69.10 34.70 34.40 10126/2004 40.00.
22.51.0390.1 NORA, LLC 120.62 34.30 29.51 25.75 31.06 09/07/2004 35.48 -
25.25.4060.2 NORLING, KYLE & SHANNON 75.67 39.05 36.62 10/0512004 40.00.
22.50.2174.1 NORTH, MIKE 72.66 39.16 33.50 1011912004 32.00 -
22.50.2238.2 NOSALSKIY, RUSLAN 102.76 48.96 34.60 19.20 09114/2004 50.00.
30.30.6260.2 NOSAREV, LIllY 56.86 42.06 16.80 10/1912004 55.79.
22.51.0936.2 NUTT AL, KYE & SUZANNA 48.73 43.83 4.90 1012212004 30.42 -
30.74.3952.2 OBENCHAIN, TERRY 54.26 27.18 27.08 1012212004 28.06 -
24.04.1260.2 OBENCHAIN, TERRY & ELLOND, 106.88 53.34 53.54 11110/2004 50.00 -
37.72.0258.1 OLDS, ANGELA 73.88 36.50 37.38 10/0812004 36.40 -
30.74.3352.2 O'LEARY, MIKE & WEBB, ERIC 94.97 46.57 48.40 1011912004 58.20 -
25.25.0086.1 OLIVER CLEAVER 99.09 21.46 21.36 17.60 38.67
25.25.0084.1 OLIVER CLEAVER 106.61 32.74 17.60 17.60 38.67
30.74.1475.1 OLMSTEAD, GERALD 72.62 32.88 39.74 1011912004 38.76 -
35.35.0153.1 OLSEN, BRIAN & PATTI 102.68 50.94 51.74 09121/2004 51.74 -
24.04.0914.1 OLSEN,H.DEAN 114.93 38.07 39.90 36.96 09121/2004 78.82 -
24.04.0902.1 OLSON, DALE & MAURA 78.95 39.05 39.90 09/2112004 37.94 -
30.30.6246.1 OMANOVIC, ASIM 115.06 32.74 28.88 32.64 20.80 1011912004 5.44 -
30.30.6248.2 OMANOVIC, IBRAHIM & SENAD 85.98 42.06 43.92 09121/2004 70.99 -
23.01.1210.2 O'NEAL, GEORGE & JANET 70.82 39.16 31.66 10/1912004 45.38 -
25.25.1058.2 ONEilL, KATHLEEN 113.24 37.16 37.06 39.02 09/1412004 41.96 -
46.46.7072.1 ORLANDO, PAUL 118.69 60.10 41.96 16.63 0910712004 17.60 -
25.25.9890.2 ORTIZ, JOSE T. 68.55 42.06 26.49
22.51.3430.2 OVERTON, DAVID 54.36 5.44 48.92 07/02/2004 56.31 -
37.72.0268.1 OWEN, KENNETH 70.45 35.29 35.16 09/0712004 71.30 -
30.74.3286.1 OWENS, GLENN & VICKIE 104.13 52.13 52.00 10/1512004 52.00 .
24.04.1982.1 PACKER, JOSEPH 95.41 45.09 50.32 10118/2004 60.00 -
24.03.0044.2 PADGETT, DAVE & CHARLENE 116.23 57.69 58.54 10/15/2004 56.58 .
36.69.0466.1 PAGE, CHARLES & LORIE ANN 158.61 83.35 75.26 10/15/2004 100.00 -
30.74.0358.5 PALLlSTER, J.L. & CHRISTY 97.25 47.71 49.54 1011912004 60.32 -
22.50.1770.2 PALMER, ELDON 136.54 80.71 55.83 09127/2004 55.83 -
36.36.1086.1 PALMER, JOE 37.41 17.70 15.25 4.46 09/16/2004 2.02 -
25.05.0428.1 PALOMO, ALEX 76.79 47.67 28.92 10/2812004 50.00 .
32.32.4666.1 PARK HOMES 34.10 17.70 11.01 3.48 1.91
32.32.4664.1 PARK HOMES INC 76.44 36.50 33.57 4.46 1.91
36.69.0300.1 PARK, JON & TESSIA 70.53 50.33 20.20 07/2612004 128.44 -
36.69.0746.2 PARKIN, CLEMENCE & TERESA 55.35 42.15 13.20 09/15/2004 75.00 -
23.02.6710.2 PARR, RYAN 95.26 65.40 29.86 10/2112004 67.56 .
35.64.3050.1 PARRISH, MARTIN 87.94 44.02 43.92 1011912004 42.94 -
30.74.3044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 103.57 54.25 49.32 10/1912004 55.00 -
36.69.2268.2 PASEWALK, JOE & MARY 119.4 7 59.31 60.16 10/05/2004 73.88 -
30.30.6070.2 PASSANNANTE, DAN & ATHENfl 105.00 62.06 42.94 09/2112004 94.35 -
30.30.6204.2 PASSANNANTE, DAN & LYNCH, 100.69 61.67 39.02 0912112004 112.16-
30.74.3970.1 PATE, ERIC & LINDA 78.95 38.07 40.86 10/22/2004 39.90 -
22.51.0318.3 PAULIN, BEN 53.74 30.66 23.08 1012012004 35.00 -
30.30.6084.2 PAYNE,TONY 77.16 39.12 38.04 10101/2004 38.04.
23.02.0120.1 PEABODY, ELLA 98.53 53.20 45.33 09/2312004 47.29 -
35.64.2022.3 PELTIER, THOMAS & KERRY 91.37 44.77 46.60 10/1912004 42.68 -
30.74.0680.1 PENICK & STOVALL. M & S 57.86 27.02 30.84 0911712004 34.76 -
37.72.0110.2 PENNINGTON, JAMES 139.24 69.18 70.06 09/29/2004 83.78 -
36.69.0452.2 PI:RCIFIELD, TIMOTHY & MISTY 125.65 42.81 42.68 40.16 09/2912004 39.18 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
i.
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 13
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:00pm
Current Period: 11/2012004
No Delinquent Minimum Amount Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08120/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
22.51.3810.2 PERKINS, BRADLEY & PATRIClt 130.64 72.50 58.14 10/19/2004 69.90 -
35.35.0172.3 PERRY, DANIEL & LORI 137.74 44.02 45.88 47.84 09/2112004 53.72 -
24.03.0066.5 PERRY, DOUGLAS & BARBARA 87.94 45.00 42.94 10/18/2004 82.17 -
29.07.0770.3 PETERSEN, IDA & MICHAEL 95.52 37.16 38.04 20.32
36.68.0238.1 PETERSON, DAVID 88.60 43.86 44.74 10/0512004 43.76 -
30.74.2750.5 PETERSON,KELU 77.68 66.56 11.12
23.02.6510.2 PETERSON, RONALD K 219.68 55.18 50.62 56.50 57.38 08/03/2004 48.20 -
37.37.4182.1 PETIENGILL, RAY & DEBBIE 129.46 45.38 36.40 47.68 08/1712004 95.36 -
35.35.2354.3 PETTY, DAVID & MARILYN 43.79 41.83 1.96 10/19/2004 40.72 -
36.69.0478.1 PHAKDY, SAM 99.55 49.35 50.20 09/21/2004 45.48 -
30.74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 94.65 47.39 47.26 09/21/2004 94.52 -
36.69.1250.1 PIERCE, RICK & DONNA 141.16 45.64 95.52 10/05/2004 125.90 -
22.51.4000.3 PIONEER FINANCE, LLC 153.02 53.92 46.61 52.49 09/21/2004 50.53 -
23.02.3340.1 POE, RICHARD 158.90 77.68 81.22 10/18/2004 103.00 -
30.30.6122.2 POLIDORI, STANLEY & AMY 59.99 30.55 29.44 1010512004 30.42 -
25.25.0054.2 POPEL, LAURIE 55.41 27.77 27.64 09/07/2004 56.26 -
23.02.1840.2 PORTENIER. ROBERT & RACHE 263.34 63.86 46.70 44.74 108.04 08113/2004 35.00 -
23.01.2410.1 POUNDS, GLENNA 53.09 27.54 25.55 10/1912004 42.21 -
22.50.2402.1 POWELL, RANDY 143.72 78.06 65.66 1011912004 64.34-
35.35.0398.2 POWERS, PAXTON 94.48 47.78 46.70 09122/2004 50.62 -
23.01.1300.2 POYSER, NANCY 82.58 40.14 42.44 09/21/2004 47.34 -
22.51.0774.4 PREECE. ROBERT 121.69 83.42 38.27 10/26/2004 38.27 -
35.35.0081.3 PRELLWITZ, BARBARA 60.80 30.94 29.86 10/27/2004 31.82 -
22.51.3102.2 PRICE. REBECCA 117.20 45.56 35.82 35.82 09117/2004 38.76-
30.74.2628.2 PRICE, SUMMER & ROBERT 77.14 35.68 41.46 10/08/2004 55.18.
35.65.0610.2 PRIMEAUX, MARK & KATRINA 115.25 45.59 46.44 23.22 11/12/2004 23.22 .
30.74.2456.1 PRINCE, MALCOM & TINA 160.99 71.25 76.02 13.72 10113/2004 102.48 -
31.52.1061.1 PROPERTY GROUP LLC 66.74 30.92 35.82 09/29/2004 41.70.
30.74.3298.3 PYLE,PETER 89.90 46.96 42.94 10/05/2004 44.90 -
23.01.0100.2 PYLlCAN, WOODROW A. 131.29 131.29 02/18/2003 45.26 -
24.04.1960.2 QUESNELL, GIL & LESLIE 215.13 115.77 99.36 10f20/2004 105.24 -
32.32.4210.2 QUINLIN, WILLIAM & KATHRYN 81.73 41.08 37.06 3.59
22.50.2414.3 QUINOWSKI, SHARON 77.19 42.69 34.50 09/13f2004 70.00.
31.52.0302.1 R T NAHAS FURNITURE STORE. 124.17 42.51 37.07 44.59 08/26/2004 96.70 -
30.74.0902.2 RACKHAM,LARRY 45.78 22.45 23.33 10/13/2004 55.20 .
24.04.1838.3 RADICAN, DONALD & CYNTHIA 147.24 50.22 48.16 48.86 09f27/2004 70.00.
22.50.3816.1 RAFTERY, STEPHEN 81.28 43.90 37.38 10112/2004 36.40 -
46.46.6216.2 RAMELLA, ROBERT 98.46 41.08 37.06 20.32
24.04.2074.1 RAMZA. RONALD 81.72 37.48 44.24 09/27/2004 61.88 -
30.74.3420.3 RANSOM, PATRICIA 252.04 97.94 84.70 69AO 09/22/2004 67.44 -
35.35.0032.2 RASMUSSEN, DANIEL 89.90 45.00 44.90 09121/2004 97.64 -
23.23.3490.2 RAYBORN,ROBERT 47.10 42.92 4.18 10/12/2004 65.00 -
21.49.1102.1 RECORD STEEL 572.22 248.20 324.02 10/19/2004 402.25 -
23.02.6490.3 REDFERN. DENISE 74.94 60.24 14.70 10/19/2004 50.00 -
30.74.0412.4 REED, ANGELA 53.72 33.72 20.00 10/29/2004 54.10 -
23.02.6940.2 REED, STACIE 95.98 44.88 51.10 09/1712004 50.12 -
30.74.0392.2 REES, ARTHUR 73.22 36.66 36.56 09/1612004 90.76 -
37.37.2954.2 REPACI, RANDALL & LYNETTE 89.81 47.55 42.26 09/21/2004 100.00 -
32.32.4692.3 RICCA, DONALD & ANNE 40.56 28.33 12.23
37.37.3118.2 RICE, JAMES & LIZETTE 309.32 41.02 42.52 102.90 122.88 06f3012004 123.26 -
25.05.0720.2 RICHARDSON. HARRY & LORI 215.96 108.56 107.40 10/20/2004 87.20 -
22.51.3154.5 RICKaRDS, SHANNON 129.27 97.99 31.28 10/29/2004 130.00.
25.05.0454.2 RILEY, R SHANE 101.49 59.63 41.86 1 0/05/2004 55.58 .
23.01.4100.5 RINCOVER. LAWRENCE 94.68 52.56 42.12 10/05/2004 62.70 .
25.05.0794.2 RINKER, JERRY & SUSANNE 245.99 120.61 125.38 10/04f2004 168.50 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 14
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:01pm
Current Period: 11/2012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pm!
Cus! No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08/20/2004 07120/2004 Date Amount
22.50.0306.2 RITTENHOUSE, CRAIG 489.91 241.82 248.09 10/26/2004 25.00 -
24.04.0894.1 RITTER, RICK 81.57 40.85 40.72 10/18/2004 42.68.
46.46.7006.1 RIVERWOOD HOMES 30.36 23.94 6.42 10108/2004 2.25 -
22.50.4582.1 RK RENOVATIONS 134.56 74.46 60.10 10/1912004 104.20.
22.51.3300.1 ROBERTS, DAVID 77.24 64.80 12.44 10/28/2004 100.20.
24.03.0848.1 ROBERTS,TODD 79.44 39.28 40.16 10113/2004 39.18 .
25.05.0164.1 ROBINSON, CAL & COLLEEN 161.97 80.07 81.90 10/1312004 93.66 .
24.04.2096.8 ROBINSON, RICHARD & PRICILl 139.66 79.92 59.74 09/14/2004 73.50 -
30.74.3092.2 RODABAUGH, WALTER & LORE 45.26 44,61 .65 10127/2004 43.83 -
30.74.3156.3 ROE, ASHLE 117.53 58.83 58.70 10/19/2004 72.42.
30.74.2632.4 ROE, WILLIAM JR 138.72 75.74 62.98 10/26/2004 40.00 -
30.74.2646.3 ROE, WILLIAM JR & DEVON 85.15 40.19 44.96 08131/2004 134.02 -
22.51.3214.2 ROEHR, CLINT 75.09 33.44 33.78 7.87 09/1712004 75.00 -
30.74.3090.1 ROGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 70.45 35.29 35.16 09116/2004 34.18 -
35.35.1222.2 ROHNBACH, DAVID 92.25 45.43 46.28 .54 09116/2004 83.00 -
22.51,0866.1 ROHRBACH, CHERYL 74.37 41.12 32.64 .61 10/05/2004 33.01 -
36.69.0544.2 ROSS, PATRICIA 50.74 50.72 .02 10/22/2004 72.16-
35.35.3028.1 ROTTA. JOE & DARCIE 253.55 45.98 51.44 47.68 108.45 06116/2004 200.00 -
31.52,0269.2 ROUND TABLE PIZZA 451 .44 28,96 112.26 105.40 204.82 03/1012004 13.40 -
35.35.0058.2 ROWETT, BOB & DANA 90.07 45.59 44.48 09/2112004 88.96 -
20.47.0074.2 RUMSEY, PHILIP & JENNIFER 146.62 55.18 45.72 45.72 08/26/2004 94.38 -
34.34.6242.1 RUSSELL DUNSTAN 34.08 29,59 4.49
46.46,7002.1 RUWE CONSTRUCTION 56.66 21.46 17.60 17.60 08/3112004 17.60 -
23.02.3180.1 RYAN, WALTER 74.45 39.60 34.85 10/1912004 70.00 -
22.50.0090.1 SABA, VIRGINA 132.89 85.83 47.06 10120/2004 80.00 -
24.03.0046.3 SABER, ROBERT J 94.97 47.55 47.42 09/15/2004 46.84 -
32.32.4636.1 SAGELAND HOMES 35.30 17.70 17.60 10/1912004 17.60 -
30.74.3432.2 SAGER, LEE & NADEAN 88.43 42.81 45.62 11f10/2004 47.50 -
23.02.2100.1 SALMAN, CHRISTOPHER L 56.18 53.18 3.00 10119/2004 47.00 -
36.68.0308.3 SANCHEZ, LESLIE 110.75 40.85 42.68 27.22 09/14/2004 50.00 -
24.04.0548,2 SAUER, DAVID 129.28 46.52 34.10 48.66 10/0412004 120.00 .
30.74.0382.2 SCHILDHAUER, YOLANDE 83.85 41.01 42.84 09/14/2004 118.02.
30.74.2828.3 SCHMECKPEPER, BRANDON & 87.94 42.06 45.88 09/21/2004 48.82 -
23.02,0110.4 SCHMECKPEPER,MERLYN 99.04 75.90 23.14 10/1912004 .18 -
35.35.0327.1 SCHNOOR. JULIE 83.53 41.83 41,70 09/28/2004 42.68 -
32.32.4946.2 SCHOTT, KELLY 103.65 34,31 34.18 35.16 09117/2004 41.04 -
22.51.3730.2 SCHOW, BART & ALISSA 99.00 59.16 39.84 10/05/2004 47.00 -
22.51.3720.2 SCHOW, BART & ALISSA 103.30 97.66 5.64 10/2612004 145.38 -
46.46.7060.1 SCHROEDER ENT 33.12 21.46 8.18 3.48
37.37.5056.1 SCHROEDER ENT 44.09 17.70 17.60 5.31 3.48
25.05.0414.3 SCOTT. EDWIN & KATHY 163.63 78.45 85.18 10/18/2004 109.68 -
24.04.2294.3 SCOTT, STEVEN & LORI 165.91 73.71 92.20 10/1812004 76.60.
23.01.2040.1 SEAMONS, DOUGLAS 114.74 42.92 36.40 35.42 09121/2004 36.40 .
30.30.6324.2 SEFEROS, CARRIE 85.45 44.02 40.98 .45 10/04/2004 20.49 .
23.02.2360.2 SEINKNECHT, DAVID 79.44 39.28 40.16 10/04/2004 23.02 .
30.74.2718.2 SELLS, DAVID 131.59 41.83 44.64 45.12 09/2112004 52.00 -
35.35.2392.2 SEMMER, CHAD & MARY 103.88 66,50 37.38 10120/2004 56.24 -
35.65,0658.2 SESSIONS, SCOTT & SON 48.10 40.10 8.00 10119f2004 31.96 -
30.74.0090.1 SETZKE, CAROL 76.80 37.96 38.84 09/21/2004 61 .38 -
35.64.2028.2 SEXTON, MARY 107.39 53.27 54.12 10119/2004 53.14.
37.37.4110.2 SHADDICK, FREDERICK & CARC 69.55 41.17 28.38 10/28/2004 42.02 .
23.02.1950.1 SHAFFER,TERRY 59.95 39.60 20.35 10/0512004 36.56 -
35.65.0448.2 SHAMBSUGH, PAMELA A. 78.10 43.04 35,06
30.30.6240.2 SHAW, KELLY 121.19 42,06 42.94 36.19
30.30.6316.2 SHAW, KELLY HELP FUND 1 54.92 40.10 14.82
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
c (
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 15
Standard Paymenl Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:01 pm
Current Period: 1112012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 0912012004 0812012004 07120/2004 Dale Amount
29.07.1072.3 SHEETS, RONALD & RHONDA 88.92 44.02 44.90 0912112004 41.96 -
30.74.0322.2 SHELDON, PAM 110.94 29.08 57.00 24.86 11/0312004 50.00 -
24.03.0082.3 SHEL TRON, ROGER 48.38 24.24 24.14 0912712004 25.12 -
22.50.3694.3 SHELTRON, ROGER 125.75 43.67 40.06 42.02 0910712004 42.02 -
30.74.3242.1 SHEL TRON, ROGER 135.62 82.90 52.72 10/2012004 99.56 -
22.50.1910A SHEL TRON, ROGER 88.71 71A2 17.29 1010612004 103.69 -
30.74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 75.03 38.07 36.96 0912112004 75.88 -
35.64.0064.3 SHIELD TRUSTEE SERVICES, U 71.14 35.68 35.46 11/0312004 36.44 -
35.35.2390.2 SHIELD TRUSTEE SERVICES, LI 109.69 54.91 54.78 0911512004 58.70 -
24.04.1878.3 SHIRLEY, GARRY 91.97 44.93 47.04 0811712004 95.48 -
22.51.0930.2 SHOBE, MONTY & CAROL 70.82 39.16 31.66 09/1712004 66.26 -
30.74.3980.1 SHUMWAY, MARY 71.43 35.29 36.14 10126f2004 42.02 -
25.09.0040.1 SHUR.LUCK HOMES 16.60 13.12 3.48
25.09.0058.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 20.36 16.88 3.48
25.09.0038.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 16.60 13.12 3.48
25.09.0006.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 5.22 3.48 1.74
25.09.0002.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 5.n 3A8 1.74
24.03.0292.1 SHURTZ, ROD 204.73 100.43 104.30 1012012004 60.00 -
23.01.2760.1 SIEGEL, ROSAUE 53.33 28.47 24.86 10118f2004 26.82 -
30.74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 209.75 78.37 81.18 50.20 09f2212004 50.20 -
25.25.0076.1 SIGNATURE HOMES 130.71 115.46 15.25 10f1512004 3.48-
25.25.0080.1 SIGNATURE HOMES 29.14 27.40 1.74
25.25.0078.1 SIGNATURE HOMES 47.99 36.50 11.49 10f1512004 3.48-
25.25.0082.1 SIGNATURE HOMES 8.16 6.42 1.74
23.02.2500.1 SILVA, JOSEPH 108.35 82.44 25.91 10126/2004 92.00 -
22.50.1920.5 SilVEY, BRYAN 75.89 41.71 34.18 1011512004 34.18 -
23.01.0770.2 SIMMONS, DANA A. 113.46 67.62 45.84 09115/2004 100.00 -
23.01.2250.2 SIMON, BRADY 91.08 45.86 45.22 1011212004 49.14 -
34.34.6068.1 SIMPSON. KENNY 114.16 38.14 37.06 21.36 17.60 0811312004 21.08 -
24.04.1302.1 SIMS, ELLEN 55.41 26.79 28.62 10f1312004 29.60 -
37.37.3896.2 SISK, DONALD 93.00 50.12 42.88 1011912004 50.00 -
37.37.3400.2 SISNEROS, lARRY 138.47 44.61 46.44 47.42 09f02f2004 46.44 -
22.51.4034.1 SKINNER, KEN 156.84 65.12 41.94 49.78 0911412004 69.18 -
23.02.0380.1 SKIVER, WAYNE D 143.25 20.30 41.57 41.57 39.81 0811712004 40.59 -
30.74.3430.1 SLAVIN, DONALD 110.99 55.07 55.92 10104/2004 65.72 -
23.02.3962.4 SLENDER, LEONARD & BOSWEI 40.35 37.20 3.15 1110312004 28.15 -
30.74.1058.2 SLYTER, GORDON 128.20 102.52 25.68 10/25f2004 120.00 -
30.74.1086.3 SLYTER, GORDON 110.48 43.04 42.94 24.50 10115/2004 60.00 -
23.02.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 100.36 47.78 52.58 10/19f2004 57.74 -
30.74.1050.1 SMITH, CARSON 61.46 28.82 32.64 09117/2004 101.54 -
23.02.1980.1 SMITH, DAVID L 121.30 59.72 61.58 09117f2004 67.46 -
35.35.1210.3 SMITH, GREGORY J 85.00 42.06 42.94 10/15f2004 44.90 -
30.74.2824.1 SMITH, JEROMY 82.12 46.07 36.05 1110212004 50.00 -
29.07.0786.2 SMITH, JUDY 44.02 43.04 .98 11/15f2004 44.90 -
22.51.0498.1 SMITH, KARL 102.38 61.22 41.16 10/19f2004 60.00 -
30.74.3178.1 SMITH, TYLER & JANET 121.79 38.07 41.86 41.86 08/2612004 40.88 -
29.07.0914.1 SOLANO, MOBBYL YN 94.81 34.63 33.52 26.66 08109f2004 27.64 -
24.03.0836.3 SOSA, JOSEPH 51.90 43.04 8.86 1011912004 43.00 -
24.03.0038.2 SPANGENBERG,TODD 86.24 25.22 24.14 36.88 08/13f2004 93.00 -
23.02.0180.2 SPANGLER,STEVE 98.93 17.19 26.92 54.82 07108/2004 55.80 -
23.02.5390.3 SPARKS, CINDY & BOWDOIN, D- 91.09 65.14 25.95
36.36.0182.2 SPARKS, HEATHER 85.20 30.29 54.91
23.02.1480.6 SPEAR, LAWRENCE & ANDREA 87.73 86.49 1.24
36.68.0010.3 SPEISER, JEFF & MARGARET 84.55 46.57 37.98 10f19/2004 68.00 -
24.04.1568.1 SPENCER, KARL 81.23 38.23 43.00 10/1512004 64.56 -
... In Msg column Indicates no Notice IS to be sent
f
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 16
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16,2004 05:01pm
Current Period: 11/20/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Gust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
36.69.0554.2 SPITZ, WALTERS 54.88 45.00 9.88
24.04.7001.1 ST ALPHONSUS 547.92 283.76 264.16 09/27/2004 3.48-
46.60.0068.1 STACY CONSTRUCTION 35.49 26.35 9.14 09/21/2004 5.44 -
24.03.0426.2 STAGGERS. PERRY 434.86 28.72 73.08 165.80 167.26 09/08/2004 100.00 -
23.02.2170.2 STALFORD,SHANNON 117.06 35.52 36.40 45.14 09/21/2004 60.00 -
30.74.3438.3 STAPLETON, DAVID & KRISTI 131.68 80.40 51.28 10/21/2004 51.28 -
30.30.6334.2 STEELE, STEVEN & DEBBIE 125.95 78.53 47.42 10/20/2004 50.36 -
25.05.0264.3 STERLING, BENJAMIN & LINDA 134.66 49.74 84.92 10/19/2004 95.70 -
30.74.2844.1 STEWART. DANIEL 129.31 65.21 64.10 10/15/2004 63.12 -
32.32.4104.2 STOFFLE, ERIC & ANDREA 84.55 39.12 37.06 8.37
30.74.2994.2 STOKESBERRY, COREY 109.42 54.86 54.56 11/02/2004 73.18 -
20.47.1072.2 STONE, CHAD 83.90 44.72 39.18 10/05/2004 39.18 -
22.50.4482.3 STONE. HAROLD 35.04 20.64 14.40 11/0212004 111.94.
23.02.0436.4 STOVALL, THOMAS 102.95 52.84 42.94 7.17
23.02.6650.1 STUART, BRUCE 73.76 39.16 34.60 10/05/2004 38.52.
23.02.5300.1 STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTlOI 89.27 89.17 .10 11/0212004 117.73 -
23.23.0001.1 STUBBLEFIELD DEV. CO 543.56 154.94 388.62 09/21/2004 357.26 -
23.23.0002.1 STUBBLEFIELD DEVELOPMENT 987.91 541.63 446.28 10/05/2004 25.00 -
30.74.3322.4 STYER,MACADE 149.90 63.04 43.92 42.94 08/24/2004 42.94 -
23.01.2320.1 SUMMERS. STACEY 92.89 50.21 42.68 09/15/2004 55.42 .
22.51.1129.1 SWCR CORP 888.42 279.92 298.86 309.64 09/07/2004 312.58 -
22.51.3092.1 SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION 44.10 24.96 19.14 10/18/2004 39.14 -
22.51.3288.1 TAHOE CONSTRUCTION 74.19 25.25 26.35 22.59 08/24/2004 30.11 -
22.51.3286.1 TAHOE CONSTRUCTION 35.61 16.75 7.55 11.31 08/24f2004 18.83 -
22.51.3284.1 TAHOE CONSTRUCTION 78.77 29.83 22.59 26.35 08/24/2004 30.11 -
37.37.3982.2 TALLMAN, JULIE & TROY 134.49 81.31 53.18 10/20f2004 58.00-
24.03.0048.6 TAMEZ, ROLANDO 81.76 40.10 41.66 10f13/2004 42.94 -
22.51.1158.2 TATILlAN, ROBERT & JANET 24.14 13.81 10.33 10/13/2004 10.33 -
20.46.0112.1 TAYLOR, MICHAEL 67.88 36.22 31.66 10105/2004 31.66 -
22.50.1020.1 TEeO INVESTMENTS 107.28 54.20 45.72 7.36 10/19/2004 50.00 -
24.04.0884.1 TEETER, TROY 30.65 30.55 .10 10f15/2004 32.28 -
20.47.0052.4 TENNANT, ROBERT & CONNIE 209.40 55.34 44.90 43.92 65.24 08/02/2004 100.00 -
23.02.1190.1 TERRELL, A 88.70 31.76 32.64 24.30 09/21/2004 40.00 -
23.Q1.0930.3 TFIOMA, PETER 67.82 40.64 27.18
22.50.1860.1 THE PODIATRY BLDG 31.24 26.08 5.16
23.02.1170.3 THE WEST FIRST STREET TRut 102.07 53.77 48.30 10/01/2004 175.62 -
23.02.2550.7 THOMAS, DREW 75.15 38.14 37.01 10/19/2004 12.00 .
22.50.0350.1 THOMASSON, DAVID C 76.70 61.22 15.48 11/12/2004 150.18 -
37.37.3824.2 THOMPSON, DAVID 70.45 35.29 35.16 09f15/2004 36.14 -
22.50.2110.2 THOMPSON, RHONDA 140.38 89.92 50.46 10/20/2004 88.12 -
30.74.3234.4 THOMSEN, LORIE 201.48 100.56 49.48 51.44 08125f2004 55.36 -
23.01.1940.1 THORNE, TORY L 136.88 87.33 49.55 09/29/2004 46.61 -
25.09.0052.1 THORNTON,DON 26.54 17.70 5.36 3.48
35.35.5026.2 THORNTON, NIKKI 112.74 35.36 39.18 38.20 08/17/2004 71 .46 -
23.02.5360.1 TIDWELL, ROBERT 76.38 40.96 35.42 10/20/2004 46.20 -
34.34.5014.1 T-MOBILE 2,658.85 748.99 730.19 1.179.67 08/24f2004 324.51 .
23.01.0720.4 TODD,BRUCE 95.34 53.38 41.96 09/21/2004 98.62 .
37.37.3908.2 TODD, DUSTIN 87.49 47.55 39.94 10/05/2004 50.00.
23.02.2200.3 TODD, RICK 63.42 31.76 31.66 10/20/2004 32.64 -
35.35.0423.2 TOMASZEWSKI, HELENE 91.54 45.82 45.72 09f21/2004 46.70 -
22.51.0671.1 TONY HICKEY 333.84 104.96 228.88 10/01/2004 292.58 -
23.01.0350.2 TORGENSEN, DAHT & JANET 45.91 39.91 6.00 11 f12/2004 31 .28 -
22.50.4022.3 TORGESON,MATTHEW 72.12 39.32 32.80 10/12/2004 35.74 -
30.74.3704.1 TORRES, L. & ENCISO, G. 80.91 40.03 40.88 09f23/2004 42.84-
30.74.2464.1 TOWN, NEAL 134.51 68.79 65.72 10/05f2004 91.20 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
{ (
C1TY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 17
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:01pm
Current Period: 11120/2004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeJinq 09/20/2004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
21.48.2693.1 TREASURE VALLEY BUS CTR 418.12 65.76 40.72 27.00 284.64 11/12/2004 40.72 .
35.35.7838.1 TREASURE VALLEY PEDIATRIC. 252.70 129.0B 123.62 10101/2004 180.02 -
22.50.3812.1 TREGELLAS, MARK 106.46 56.98 49.48 09/21/2004 52.42 -
35.35.3032.1 TRINITY HOMES 56.82 40.26 16.56 10/19/2004 110.00 -
37.37.3912.1 TRINITY HOMES 122.22 40.26 36040 36.20 9.36
20.46.0180.2 TROYER, SCOTT & LOIS 101.22 56.32 44.90 10/14/2004 34.70 -
30.74.2488.2 TRUITT, CHARLES & VIRGINIA 75.50 28.00 47.50 10/05/2004 62.20 -
24.04.0918.4 TUCKETT, QUETON & COLLEEN 101.74 41.08 43.92 16.74
30.74.2386.2 TUPPER, PAXTON & APRIL 124.69 61.43 63.26 10/26/2004 43.18 -
23.02.0330.1 TURNER, DAVID & JEANINE 10 1.54 56.48 45.06 10119/2004 47.02-
24.03.0348.3 TURNER,MARCY 89.90 45.00 44.90 10/06/2004 45.Ba -
20.46.0400.2 ULRICH, RAMONA 65.75 33.21 32.54 09/1512004 31.00 -
23.02.3160.1 U~QUART, JASON 110.50 54.32 56.18 10112/2004 53.24 -
30.74.2876.1 USSERY, TRACY 146.31 72.73 73.58 10/19/2004 72.60 -
23.02.4840.4 VALESKO, DONALD 55.53 53.31 2.22 11/12/2004 45.00 -
23.01.0860.3 VAN BRAGT, WILLY 77.76 41.28 36.48 10119/2004 35.00 -
29.57.0100.1 VAN HEES 462.51 443.71 18.80 10/26/2004 398.59 -
22.51.1144.2 VANCE, JIM & DERRIAN 76.68 76.68
24.03.0278.1 VANDERMEER,ALETA 114.93 38.07 38.92 37.94 0912112004 77.84 -
25.25.1088.2 VANDEVENTER,DARREL 92.52 46.80 45.72 10/01/2004 42]8 -
22.51.4070.1 VASCO PROPERTIES 1,062.60 531.73 530.67 09/22/2004 530.87 -
20.47.1124.2 VASSIN, SERGEY & TATYANA 88.42 51.42 37.00 11110/2004 4.96 -
35.35.1422.1 VATRIC, ADEM & SUADA 86.86 43.04 43.82 10/1412004 45.00 -
24.04.0522.3 VERNON, KEN & LOU ANN 50.56 50.49 .07 10/2012004 110.00 -
22.50.0136.3 VICTORY, CHRIS 172.44 62.76 109.68 10119/2004 77. 72 .
23.02.1860.3 VICTORY, CHRISTOPHER 136.49 41.99 48.72 45.78 08/16/2004 136.08.
22.50.4586.2 VICTORY, MICHAEL & YUNSUK 115.14 37.84 37.20 19.56 20.54 0811112004 41.08 -
22.51.4350.1 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS 281.89 161.68 120.21 09121/2004 121.66 -
23.02.4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY 114.30 59.92 54.38 10/27/2004 63.20 -
24.03.0284.3 WADDELL, WILLIAM & ELEANOF 65.02 61.08 3.94 10/19/2004 47.03 -
23.02.1430.4 WADDOUPS, DOROTHY 88.20 24.24 28.06 35.90 09121/2004 31.04 -
23.02.2250.4 WAGSTAFF, DENMAN 70.17 42.06 28.11 09/2712004 133.60 .
36.36.1108.1 WALKER BUILDING 57.82 40.26 17.56 10/19/2004 12.25 -
23.01.0450.7 WALKER, TERESA 83.72 27.72 24.14 24.14 7.72 07/2312004 30.00 -
23.01.3340.1 WALSH. RON 136.52 136.52 01/16/2002 29.17.
25.25.4528.2 WARD, JENNIE 48.66 20.38 28.28 02/10/2004 86.64 -
24.03.0420.1 WARNER, DENNIS & KAREN 112.69 60.35 47.08 5.26 09/2112004 37.90 -
21.48.2651.1 WATER WORKS CAR WASH INC 196.64 66.74 129.90 09121/2004 122.06 -
22.51.0734.2 WATSON, CLAYTON & THELMA 54.80 28.70 26.10 09/29/2004 27.08 -
35.35.2356.1 WATSON, KARIN 99.55 50.33 49.22 09/2112004 50.20 -
23.01.0260.1 WATSON, PAUL D. 82,58 46.02 36.56 09129/2004 31.66 -
24.03.0302.2 WATTS, MELVIN & SONDEE 84.83 43.79 41.04 10/19/2004 60.00 -
23.02.6080.1 WEBB, GERALD 81.11 42.85 38.26 11/02/2004 46.10 -
24.04.2298.1 WEIGHT, RICHARD 43.68 40.74 2.94 1110212004 54.36 -
21.48.2886.1 WENDY'S - EAGLE ROAD 314.80 288.45 26.35 10/1912004 160048 -
23.01.1010.5 WEST, JONI & BERT 119.22 64.34 54.88 09/21/2004 120.54 -
22.50.4530.2 WEST, ROBERT & JONI 137.50 43.36 94.14 09/29/2004 60.00 -
36.68.0250.1 WESTENDORF, KELLY 96.71 49.35 47.36 10105/2004 55.00 -
30.74.3122.1 WESTERBERG, STEVEN 79.93 39.05 40.88 10/19/2004 40.88 -
36.69.0118.1 WHEATLEY, BLAIN 111.33 56.87 54.46 10/19/2004 60.00.
35.35.0067.2 WHEELER, JOSHUA & HEIDI 102.55 61.83 40.72 09/21/2004 134.22 -
24.04.1922.3 WHEELER, JUDY 68.69 45.98 22.71
22.51.3840.1 WHEELER, LOREN R 45.30 43.90 1.40 11/02/2004 34.76.
29.07.0242.1 WHILES, SCOTT 66.36 32.74 33.62 09129/2004 31.66.
24.04.1618.2 WHIPPLE, JASON 176.61 79.25 97.36 10/18/2004 104.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
/
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 18
Standard Payment Customers Nov 16, 2004 05:01pm
Current Petiod: 1112012004
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/2012004 08/20/2004 07/20/2004 Date Amount
22.50.2384.4 WHITE. SHAINE 64.84 34.42 29.86 .56 0912112004 30.00 -
30.74.3204.1 WHITE, TAWNYA 48.73 26.79 21.94 10/19/2004 60.00 -
32.32.4698.2 WHITNEY, TYLER 90.07 44.61 45.46 10/05/2004 91.90 -
30.74.0064.2 WHITSITT, JOSEPH 125.54 61.84 63.70 10/21/2004 67.78 -
25.05.0792.1 WICK, DON 160.65 73.53 87.12 10/1912004 98.88 -
30.74.3708.3 WILBURN, STEVEN 79.63 41.01 38.62 10/29/2004 30.00 -
24.04.0510.3 WILKINS, JON & HEATHER 80.98 41.08 39.90 09/07/2004 80.00 -
23.02.2040.1 WILLIAMS. FRED 79.93 40.03 39.90 10/19/2004 50.68 -
22.50.4036.2 WILLIAMS, SHELLlE 147.61 102.01 44.48 1.12 10/20/2004 88.82 -
22.50.0070.1 WILLIAMSON. JOHN 64.28 33.44 30.84 10/1912004 31.82 -
23.02.0290.1 WILLIAMSON, JOHN F 40.96 38.18 2.78 10/19/2004 36.56 -
23.02.0260.1 WILLIAMSON, JOHN F 59.58 54.68 4.90 10/19/2004 41.30 -
23.02.0250.1 WILLIAMSON. JOHN F 55.66 51.74 3.92 10/19/2004 44.24 .
30.74.0356.1 WILSON. DEANA 77.65 63.89 13.76 10/1112004 50.00 -
25.05.0416.2 WILSON, DON & JAN 130.44 51.88 75.28 3.30 10/05/2004 120.00 .
24.03.0004.1 WilSON, JAN 75.35 42.15 33.20 10/19/2004 33.20 .
25.25.1008.2 WILSON, MICHAEL 65.38 32.74 32.64 10/13/2004 37.54 -
22.50.0208.1 WILSON, MITCHELL D 90.28 52.40 37.88 10/1512004 45.00 -
24.03.0316.2 WILSON, RUSSELL 82.09 50.33 31.76 10/19/2004 100.00.
24.04.1584.1 WIND, JOHN 104.28 50.72 53.56 09/29/2004 29.74 -
29.07.0880.2 WINKLER, GREG 106.36 35.52 36.40 34.44 09/21/2004 30.60 .
22.50.2302.1 WINTERTON. DARIN 73.44 39.00 34.44 09/21/2004 71.82 .
25.25.1086.3 WISSER, RICK & CATHY 92.03 45.59 46.44 09116/2004 92.88 .
20.47.1204.2 WIXSON, RYAN 103.67 58.05 45.62 09121/2004 118.82.
24.04.1560.1 WOOD, JONATHAN 97.25 45.75 51.50 10/19/2004 59.34 -
32.32.4124.2 WRIGHT, MARK 91.37 43.79 47.58 09/21/2004 43.66 -
35.35.0183.2 WUNDER, PATRICIA 58.88 28.98 27.90 10107/2004 55.80 -
22.50.2426.1 WYATT, SAMUAL 133.86 73.64 60.22 1012112004 75.00 -
24.03.0412.4 WYMAN, DUSTINE 74.23 41.83 32.40 10/1912004 100.00 -
30.74.0372.3 YELTON, LAURA 116.07 75.30 40.77 10/05/2004 21.29 -
32.32.4012.2 YOCH, PAUL & JENNIFER 80.24 20.48 20.38 20.38 19.00 08122/2004 20.38 -
24.04.1662.3 YOHNER, LARRY & MARJORIE 120.36 53.82 49.80 16.74
36.68.0158.1 YOKOM. TOM 68.17 43.79 24.38 1011412004 60.00 -
30.74.2366.1 YORK, GEORGE 47.45 41.83 5.62 10/15/2004 40.00 -
23.02.0650.2 YOUNG. AUSTIN L 151.67 46.47 66.70 36.70 1.80 09/22/2004 60.00 -
30.74.3586.2 YOUNG, FRED 76.01 38.07 37.94 1010512004 43.82 -
22.50.2338.2 YOUNGER. RUSSELL 77.85 41.71 36.14 09/1612004 71.30 -
22.50.3784.1 ZAVALA, JOSE 119.76 42.92 36.40 37.38 3.06 10/04/2004 100.00 -
Grand Totals: 113.140.90 53,574.74 46,149.29 9,564.26 3,852.61
Report Criteria:
Tenninated customers not included
Customer.Cust No 0 '" {<} 880000001
Customer. Bill Cycle'" 1
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
~p /CITYOF
L/Vlerldian
"
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Kei th Bird
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234/ fax 895-0390
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Council Chambers,
Parks & Recreation
lIE. Bower Street
888-3579/ fax 898-5501
Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday,
November 16,2004 at 6:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
Planning & Zoning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533/ fax 888-6854
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issue:
Police
1401 E. Wntertower Lane
888-6678/ fax 846-7366
- Update by Tom Hudson on Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500/ fax 898-9551
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
- Sewer (WWTP)
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191/ fax 884-0744
J;LL:.P-
WILLIAM G. BERG,
..
..
..
..
DATED this 12th of November, 2004.
- Water
2235 N. W. 8th Street
888-5242jfax 884-1159
~q "\ t~. ~,
CITY HALL 33 Ef\ST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLEHK-E\X 888-4218 l-IDL\...... HESOtmCES-E\X 884-8723 FIN,\NCE & UTILITY BILLJ......G -E\X 887 .48J 3 ~1:\YOH'S OFFICE- F:\X 884.81]9
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF NOU 17 '04 08:32 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MI N/SEC PGS CMDt:! STATUS
01 11/17 07:53 PUBLIC WORKS EC--S 01'04" 004 162 OK
02 11/17 07:54 12084664405 EC--S 01'05" 604 162 OK
03 11/17 07:56 8841159 EC--S 01'05" 004 162 OK
04 11/17 07:57 2088840744 EC--S 01'06" 004 162 OK
65 11/17 07:59 POLICE DEPT EC--S 01' 03" 004 162 OK
06 11/17 08:01 8985561 EC--S 01 '02" 004 162 OK
67 11/17 08:62 LIBRARY EC--S 01' 18" 004 162 OK
08 11/17 08:04 92083776449 EC--S 01'03" 004 162 OK
09 11/17 08:05 3886924 EC--S 01'03" 004 162 OK
10 11/17 08:07 2088886854 EC--S 01'03" 804 162 OK
11 11/17 08:08 208 895 0390 EC--S 01'02" 004 162 OK
12 11/17 08:10 128300040 G3--S 01'22" 004 162 OK
13 11/17 08:12 208 387 6393 EC--S 01' 00" 004 162 OK
14 11/17 08:14 ADA CTY DEUELMT EC--S 01'04" 004 162 OK
15 11/17 08:15 8885852 EC--S 01'03" 004 162 OK
16 11/17 08:17 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'02" 000 162 INC
17 11/17 08:18 CHERRY LANE G3--S 60'34" 000 162 INC
18 11/17 08:20 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'01" 800 162 INC
19 11/17 08:20 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'34" 000 162 INC
20 11/17 08:21 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 01'03" 084 162 OK
21 11/17 08:23 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 01'03" 004 162 OK
22 11/17 08:25 2088886701 EC--S 01'03" 004 162 OK
25 11/17 08:30 3810160 EC--S 01' 44" 004 162 OK
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
----------------~---~-----~------------------------~---------~------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16. 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
x
X
Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree )C Keith Bird
'! Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2.
Pledge of Allegiance:
C?a.r
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: fYt~
- TX CONFl.-. 'HTION REPORT >1<*
(
AS OF NOV 17 '04 09:04 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIWSEC PGS CMDi:I STATUS
01 11/17 e8:41 208 895 0390 EC--S 00'41" 01012 163 OK
02 11/17 08:42 12831010040 G3--S 08'51" 002 163 OK
03 11/17 08'44 208 387 6393 EC-S 00'45" 01012 163 OK
1014 11/17 e8:45 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC--S 1010'41" 01012 163 OK
05 11/17 08:46 8885052 EC--S 00'40" 10102 163 OK
136 11/17 08:48 CHERRY LANE G3--S 01' 19" 002 163 OK
07 11/17 08:50 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 1010'40" 1302 163 OK
08 11/17 08:51 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00'40" 01012 163 OK
09 11/17 08:52 21388885701 EC--S 00'41" 01012 163 OK
10 11/17 08'57 8841159 EC--S 00'41" 002 163 OK
11 11/17 09:04 VALLEY TIMES ----S 00'00" 08e 163 BUSY
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
-----------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 7;00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle ~ Christine Donnell
~ Charlie Rountree -X.. Keith Bird
-X- Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: &p.~
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: jJrt.~
4_ Adoption of the Agenda: Atpr-<P~
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: ~v<-
B. License Aareement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project: arrr':w><-
G. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: r~
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk ~ Ranklng of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: ~
2.
Meridian TIP:
di? &k.$ kO<--
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
M",icli.n City CUU!ll:ll ht:o:nd. - Nuvcmba 16, 2004 l'o~e 1 of2
AlllMo:n.l< p""eJll<d 'I public ",,'cJjng< ,"'1) becomo propelly orUle City MMeridiil1l.
Anyof.le' deslnl1~ l:Ic.::::cmlI!lO~til)n for di:.~bUitie.s ttl'Mctl to doc'Unlenls and/or bell.nngS"
~IoJ,.conroet lhe Cuy CI".I<. Office or SSS4433 alleaS! 48lrou", prior to tho public mmio&.
** TX CONF J ", IAT) ON REPORT **
AS OF NOU 17 '04 08:41 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
DATE TIME TO/FROM
11/17 08=27 PUBLIC WORKS
11/17 08=29 12084664405
11/17 08:33 2088840744
11/17 08=34 POLICE DEPT
11/17 08=35 8985501
11/17 08:36 LIBRARY
11/17 08:37 92083776449
11/17 08=38 3886924
11/17 08'40 2e88885854
MODE
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
M1N/SEC PGS
00'41" 002
00' 41" 002
00'42" 002
00'41" 0212
00'40" 002
00' 52" 002
00'40" 002
00'40" 002
00' 41" 002
CMDlt
163
153
163
163
163
163
153
163
163
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
----------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 7;00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance;
X Shaun Wardle -L Christine Donnell
=:x= Charlie Rountree ~ Keith Bird
--X- Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: Gttr
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: tyt.~
4. Adoption of the Agenda: "ffn9 ~
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: ~v-L
B. License AQreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project; CVJ1rrPY'<.--
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: r~
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sid9walk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: ~
2.
Meridian TIP:
dtr~ kt1L-
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agl'!nda)
M"lill;.,,, Cily C~Ull&11 ~C'llII. - No'"m"", 16, 2004 P;,~e I ~r2
Allmo,cri.1I< pro<ell"'d 0\ publ;" "''-'<lings .h.1I b""ome Pl'Dpeny of~le City of MeridiilIl.
Anyon. di>!lnn~ llCOOrnmod:ltiOn tur di.<3hilifics reI'lod to doo",,,.,,," ond/or bonring;
r'<.lse COn/.Ol tho Cily CI..I<.'s OK",..t S88M33 allr:llSt 48 hou", priM 10 the publio meeJin~.
pl.Sl. rost ~( fJblie- KAiGG 1\f1C1lllcs ~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. License Agreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Proiect:
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy:
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk:
2. Meridian TIP:
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Agenda ~ November 16,2004 Page 1 of2
All materials presented at pub lie meetings shall become propelty 0 r the City 0 f Meridian.
Anyone dcsiling accommodation for disabiliti es related to documents and/or healings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
8. Tabled from November 9, 2004: MI 04-015 Request for a Miscellaneous
application approval to allow a one-time lot division to separate an un-
platted parcel into two parcels in an I-L zone for Montaaue-Sauriol. LLC
by Montague-Sauriol, LLC - 1127 East Pine Avenue:
9. FP 04-069 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 single-family residential
building lots and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-8 zone for
Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 by Capital Development - north of West
Ustick Road and east of North Linder Road:
10. FP 04-070 Request for Final Plat approval of 40 single-family residential
building lots and two common lots on 10.32 acres in an R-8 zone for
Roseleaf Subdivision No.2 by Liberty Development, Inc. - 3615 South
Locust Grove Road:
11. Continued Public Hearing from November 3, 2004: AZ 04-025
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 121 .96 acres from R4 (Ada County)
to R-4 zone for Vienna Woods Subdivision No. 1-7 and Edinburah
Place Subdivision No. 1-2 by the City of Meridian - NEC of East
McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road:
12. Public Hearing: CUP 04-039 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
women's fitness center in a C-N zone for Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherry
Crossina' Subdivision by Robnett Construction, Inc. - northwest corner
of Cherry Lane and Linder Road:
13. Public Hearing: CUP 04-038 Request for a coffee shop with a drive-thru
window in a C-C zone for EI Dorado Subdivision. Lot 6. Block 5 by
W.H. Moore Company - north west corner of East Overland Road and
Bonito Way and west of South Eagle Road:
14. Public Hearing: AZ 04-027 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.5
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Christian Familv Matters. Inc. by Don
Weber - east of South Linder Road and south of West Overland Road:
15. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
16. Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(f):
Meridian City Council Agenda - November 16,2004 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 houl1i prior to the public meeting.
, (
, ,MATION REPORT ** AS OF NOlJ 12 '04 17:12 PAGE. 01
**TXCL
CITY OF MERIDIRN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDIl STATUS
14 11/12 16'40 3810160 EC--S 01'42" 004 125 OK
15 11/12 16'42 PUB~IC WORKS EC--S GG'59" 004 125 OK
16 11/12 16:44 12084664405 EC--S 01'01" 004 125 OK
17 11/12 16:46 88411S9 EC--S 00'59" 00'1 125 OK
18 11/12 16:47 208884074'1 EC--S 01'01" 004 125 OK
19 11/12 16:49 POLICE DEPT EC--S 00'59" 004 125 OK
20 11/12 16:S0 8985501 EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
21 11/12 16:51 LIBRARY EC--S 01'16" 004 125 OK
22 11/12 16:53 92083776449 EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
23 11/12 16: 55 3886924 EC--S 00'59" 004 125 OK
24 11/12 16:56 2088886854 EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
25 11/12 16: 58 F'LL AMER I CAN INS EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
26 11/12 16:59 208 895 0390 EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
27 11/12 17:01 128300040 G3--S 01'20" 004 125 OK
28 11/12 17:03 208 387 6393 EC--S 01'03" 004 125 OK
29 11/12 17:04 ADA CTY DElJELMT EC--S 01'00" 004 125 OK
30 11/12 17:06 8885862 EC--S 00'58" 004 125 OK
31 11"12 17:08 CHERRY LANE G3--S 02'15" 004 125 OK
32 11/12 17:10 POST OFFICE EC--S 01'41" 004 125 OK
plla.)c ~ost $ { fJbliu NoiiCG ~~lllC& ~
CITY OF :MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Rolf-call Attendance:
_ Shaun Wardle _ Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God:
4. Adoption ofthe Agenda:
5. Consent Agend;i:
A. Approve Minutes of October 25, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. License A~reement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project:
6. Departm9nt Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave POlicy:
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk:
2. Meridian TIP:
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
MCIldi", CiLy Cnu",il ^~<mJo - to!o>=b<( 16.2004 POlloI of2
AU mA~'C:n:ll.. pr.::stflrcd It publi" rnet1jop sb.1ll beGIJnlc' pmp~rty oftbe City ofMcrldi.ln.
Anyone desiring;tl~C'omlTlodAtion fordi-'l,lbilid'C:$ I'1:'bled 10. c.lQr;UITtCntSt:.lldlornt:::!rin~:s
1'1':3St C:(lon~ct thc:-Chy CI~j'l(s O.fftcc t:l1.!l8~4)3 all~l48 hnufS prior to Ibc:pubUe m.::ctlne,.
** TX CONFIR....,lON REPORT **
AS OF NOV 12 '84 17:17 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDij STATUS
01 11/12 17:13 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00'5'3" 004 125 OK
82 11/12 17:14 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 01'88" 1304 125 OK
133 11/12 17:16 2088886701 EC--S 813'5'3" 13134 125 OK
-------------------------------------~---------------------------------~--------------------
pLta')L Vast 10( (JbliG Na~tG -l\r161l)ic:, ~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16t 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI.call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree _ Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community lnvocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. License Aqreement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Prolect:
6. Department Reports;
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative leave Policy:
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk - Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk:
2. Meridian TIP:
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
MclidiM. City Council Attnola - November 16. !{l04 hge I or:!
^lIlll.:llenals p,os""ted al public meotin~s sllall bteumepmpcny orlbe ell)' of Meridian,
Anyone desirirlg ccoQmmod.l>tion ronlisubilitics relate~ to dueW'tlcnlS PlWOI' he:lrings
ple.:lSC con~cllhe City CI~k'$ Office <It R8t\-443l all=t 48 hours prior to lae publio meeting.
,
** TX CONFIRMAlluN REPORT **
AS OF NOU 24 '04 16:58 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
28 11/24 16:57 3810160
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 01' 106" 002 163 OK
------------------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 16,2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
=z= Charlie Rountree -X.. Keith Bird
-J..- Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: bar
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Ed Kreiner, with Meridian Assembly
of God: jJY't-~
4_ Adoption of the Agenda: ~~ ~
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of October 26, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: ~v~
B. License Aareement for the 2004 McMillan Water Extension
Project: ~p-r(Jv><...-
6. Department Reports:
A. City Attorney - Bill Nary
1. Administrative Leave Policy: r~
B. Mayor's Office
1. Discussion of ACHD Sidewalk ~ Ranking of Community
Program Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk: ~
2.
Meridian TIP:
dI:r &k..S .s:.uL
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
M<:ricli.n City Council Ag<llll. - NOV<'l'tI!x,716, 2UU4 :n.llC I of2
All mSlcti.!1< jl~.lI~"" ..r public m""ling,s ,11..11 boctlme propetty of tlie City of"Meridion.
Anyone deslllllH uee~Od3lion fur di..hiliries rel~lcd to documents sn<lluT b...rinSS
please COnla...l me ell)' Clerk s Office 1I1 888-4433 llllcn:;l 48 houn: prinr 10 lhe public mt'Cting.
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C November 16, 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF MONTAGUE- )
SAURIOL, LLC FOR A )
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION )
APPROVAL TO ALLOW A ONE- )
TIME LOT DIVISION TO )
SEP ARA TE AN UNPLATTED )
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS IN )
AN I-L ZONE LOCATED AT 1127 E. )
PINE A VENUE IN THE NE y.; OF )
THE SE y.; OF T. 3N., R. IE., )
SECTION 7 )
)
CASE NO. MI-04-01S
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF MISCELLANEOUS
APPLICATION
This matter coming before the City Council for Miscellaneous Application approval
pursuant to Meridian City Code ~ 12-3- 1. B to allow a one-time lot division to separate an unplatted
parcel into two parcels for Montague-Sauriol, LLC and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner, and Anna Borchers Canning,
Planning Director, for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 16,
2004 to the Mayor and Council, the council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The subject application by Montague-Sauriol, LLC is approved subject to
those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the memorandum to the
Mayor and City Council, from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner, and Anna
Borchers Canning, Planning Director, for the Planning and Zoning
Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 16, 2004 listing six (6)
Conditions of Approval, a true and correct of which is attached hereto
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROV AL OF MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR A ONE-TIME LOT DIVISION TO
SEPARATE PARCELS ON AN UNPLATIED PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS FOR MONTAGUE-SAURIOL (MI-04-015)
Page 1 of4
marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four (4) pages, and by this reference
incorporated herein, and the response letter from Roy Montague, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and consisting
of 5 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the comment letter
from Ada County, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked
Exhibit "C" and consisting of 1 page, and by this reference incorporated
herein, and the additional requirements from the action ofthe Council taken
at their November 16, 2004 meeting as follows, to wit:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
For the purposes of this discussion, the O.79-acre property shall be referred
to as the "split" parcel. The remaining ll.95-acre property shall be
referred to as the "remainder" parcel.
A. Applicant shall submit a recorded copy ofthe Record of Survey
signed by the City Engineer prior to Certificate of Zoning
Compliance issuance on the "split" parcel. The Record of Survey
(ROS) upon which there is contained the certificate and signature
of the City Engineer verifying that the drawing meets the City's
requirements shall be signed only at such time as:
i. The northern lot line for the split parcel shall be shifted south
to align with Commercial Avenue right-of-way (approximately
25 feet.)
ii. Note "Parcel A" and "Parcel B" on the survey.
iii. There are numerous errors on the survey. The City Engineer /
Public Works Director has contacted your surveyor regarding
these errors. These errors must be corrected before the City
Engineer will sign the survey.
iv. The ROS dimensions are approved by the City Engineer and;
v. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements
are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has
been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and
required on-site improvements.
B. Applicant must comply with all subdivision improvements on the
"split" parcel as required by MCC 12-5-2.
C. Applicant shall comply with all improvements on the "split" parcel
as required by Ada County Highway District.
D. The "remainder" parcel shall not be eligible for a building permit
until such time that the entire "remainder" parcel is platted and right-
of-way is dedicated for the Commercial Avenue extension
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPRQV AL OF MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR A ONE-TIME LOT DIVISION TO
SEPARATE PARCELS ON AN UNPLATIED PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS FOR MONTAGUE-SAURJQL (MI-04-015)
Page 2 of 4
E. The "split" parcel shall have a recorded temporary cross access
agreement across the "remainder" parcel until such time that it has
frontage on a public street.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code ~ 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek ajudicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
llD+h
day
of November
,2004.
Attest:
J/dLft
William G. Berg, Jr.,
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department, and
City Attorney.
By: jQL\(lffi 1) h. (LJ./V'.-J
City Clerk's Office
Dated: \ - 5pOS
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROV AL OF MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR A ONE-TIME LOT DIVISION TO
SEPARATE PARCELS ON AN UNPLATTED PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS FOR MONTAGUE-SAURIOL (MI-04-015)
Page 4 of4
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF CAPITAL
DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL
OF 3S SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS
AND 3 COMMON LOTS ON 10.17
ACRES IN AN R-8 ZONE
LOCATED NORTH OF WEST
USTICK ROAD AND EAST OF
NORTH LINDER ROAD IN
APORTION OF THE SW ~ OF T.
4N., R.IW., SECTION 36
C/C November 16,2004
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. FP-04-069
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code ~ 12-3-7 on November 16,2004, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 16, 2004, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements ofthe preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING BALDWIN PARK SUBDIVISION NO.9
LOCATED IN APORTION OF THE SW ~ OF T. 4N., R. lW., SECTION 36,
BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2004, 4030B-
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BALDWIN PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 9/ (FP-04-069)
Page 1 of 4
PL T.DWG 10/08/04 WKB, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10/08/04, SHEET 1 OF 2,
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC., BOISE, IDAHO", Capital Development, Inc.,
Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments
as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen,
Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce
Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works Department, dated:
Hearing Date: November 16, 2004, listing 17 SITE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 8 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 5
pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Briggs
Engineering, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit
"B" and consisting of 1 page, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the
additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at their November 16,
2004 meeting as follows, to-wit:
1.1 Adopt the Recommendation of the Central District Health
Department as follows:
The Central District Health requires after written approval
from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve
this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans
must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department
of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for
central sewage and central water; that run-ofEis not to create a
mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that the
stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to
discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BALDWfN PARK SUBDNISION NO. 9/ (FP-04-069)
Page 2 of 4
and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should
obtain current best management practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater management system that is
preventing groundwater and surface water degradation.
Manuals for guidance:
1. State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best
Management Practices for Idaho Cities and
Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of
Environmental Quality, July 1997.
2. Stormwater Best Management Practices
Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public
Works Department, May 2000.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67 -8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BALDWIN PARK SUBDNISION NO. 91 (FP-04-069)
Page 3 of 4
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek ajudicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the -.J loth day
of _NOVet'r'\.be.Y"
, 2004.
di~~
\\\H I ill I 1t1f1r
\\\\ ft" & ,,~~ hI
,,'I.\\~~ Or IIJ,iJ:.lYiJt..Jf I~J.!.}1ayo
" 4'\. 'r.<'f .. 'I"
~ po"".... ,-,oel'n" c".
~ V' eJi.\r, r.q r. ",? 1-
,:. 4J 'f:>, ~
~ ~d ~
~ ~
- -
- s'r"L i
'L,a. ::;
. . ' ~
!') ..
William G. Berg, Jr., Ci CI ~ . ~~ '\~ f> j
~ "1f<> ~r 1S""i ,. ~.J!' ~
Copy served upon Applicant, the PI;~~{l41:~iartment, Public Works Department, and
City Attorney. . '~'>!":t.(,,;\t:,)~.~,~Nif'
Attest:
By: ,j(U1lm -J:jl\.i QfY\
City Clerk's Office
Dated: 12 -} 0 ~ 04J
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BALDWIN PARK SUBDNISION NO. 9/ (FP-04-069)
Page 4 of 4
i
t
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
"'"'"'- p ~ CITY OF . .._~;~
'-/VLeridian
.",
~
'{..
'.'
~J
I
if;
/
CITY HALL
(208) 888-4433 - Fax 887-4813
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-221 I - Fax 898-9551
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine DOIUlell
Shaun Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 888.4433 - FAX 887-4813
Slue,
,1903
STAFF REPORT:
City Council Date: November 16, 2004
To:
Mayor & City Council
WI.
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner 0
101m Boyd, Engineering Tech II ?.u!=>
From:
Re:
Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 9
Request for Final Plat approval of Thirty Five (35) Single-Family Residential
Building Lots and Three (3) Common Lots on 10.17 Acres in an R-8 Zone, by
Capital Development (File No. FP-04-069).
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Capital Development, has applied for final plat approval of the ninth phase of
Baldwin Park Subdivision. The subject final plat was part of a preliminary plat called Baldwin
Park Addition. This phase of the subdivision includes 35 single-family residential building lots
and 3 common lots on 10.17 acres in an R-8 zone. The gross density of Phase No.9 is
approximately 3.44 dwelling units/acre. The net density is approximately 4.41 dwelling
units/acre.
The common area lots within the subdivision consist oflandscape, drainage, and pathway lots.
The pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by the
Homeowners Association.
This phase of Baldwin Park Subdivision is located approximately Y2 mile east ofN. Linder Road
and 12 mile north ofW. Ustick Road, in the SW y,; ofT.4N., R.l W., Section 36.
Staff finds that the final plat substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat although
a few changes were made. The Final Plat shows three building lots less, collectively in Blocks
17 and 19, than was approved on the Preliminary Plat. The micropath to the north on the
common lot (Lot 7, Block 19) has been shifted to the west by one lot width, the micropath to the
FP-04-069
Exhibit "A"
Baldwin Park Sub9 FP.04-069 Exhibit A
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 16, 2004
Page 2 of 5
west decreased 12.5 feet in width, and a pathway was added to the east side of the common lot
connecting the park area to N. Bryce Canyon Place. The easement width of the White Drain and
Coleman Lateral was decreased by 20-feet due to a reduction in Settler's Irrigation District
required easement because the Coleman Lateral was tiled rather than left open. There were also
two IS-foot wide common lots added along N. Buckstone Ave. on phase 8. Excluding the width
of the irrigation easement which is not usable open space because Settler's Irrigation District
required the area to be fenced, this subdivision (phases 8 & 9) actually has more open space
than was originally approved in the preliminary plat. Staffhas no objection to these changes.
Staff recommends approval of this phase of Baldwin Park Subdivision with the comments and
conditions stated in this report.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved Annexation (AZ-03-033), Preliminary
Plat (PP-03-038) and Development Agreement (lnst. No. 102083000).
2. The pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and
maintained privately by the Baldwin Park Subdivision Homeowner's Association. The
City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to
the culinary water system shall be required. Plans and specifications for the irrigation
system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development
plan review process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual
must be submitted prior to plan approval. If a single-point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas
prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
3. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed,
and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for
building penuits. All development improvements, including fencing, micro-paths,
irrigation, and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates
of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required
for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
4. Six-foot tall solid cedar fencing will be required along the western and southern
boundary ofthe subdivision. All fencing shall be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
5. Vacate the existing right-of-way (29-feet) on the east side of the site (Venable Lane).
The vacation must be completed through the ACHD process and proof of approval
submitted to the City prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
FP 04-030
Exhibit "A"
Baldwin Park Sub9 FP-04-069 Exhibit A
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 16, 2004
Page 3 of5
6. Please revise the Landscape Plan dated 10-12-04 (L-l & L-2), prepared by The Land
Group, Inc. as follows:
a. Show min. 5-foot wide paved path within the northern micropath on the common
lot (Lot 7, Block 19).
b. Six-foot tall solid cedar fencing is required along the western and southern
subdivision boundary.
Three copies of a revised landscape plan must be submitted to the Planning & Zoning
Department prior to signature on the Final Plat.
7. Please add the northerly lot dimension on Lot 13, Block 19.
8. Please add or revise the following notes on the face ofthe plat:
(3.) "Each single family structure shall contain a minimum of 1301 squre feet,
excluding garagc."
(5.) "Lot 9, Block 17 -are is a non-buildable lots- to be owned and maintained by the
Baldwin Park Homeowners Association, or its assigns, and are is covered.. ."
9. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's "Final" letter for the
street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply.
1 O. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via the White Drain Trunk. Applicant will be
responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development.
Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works
Department.
11. Municipal water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from mains
installed in previous phases. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains
to and tlrrough this proposed development.
12. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
13. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
14. Revise the plat to graphically depict eight foot (8') wide public utilities, drainage and
irrigation easements along the west sides of Lot 10, Block 17 and Lot 9, Block 19. These
are side lot lines and they contain pressure irrigation mains along them.
15. The Northern boundary line, bearing and distance calls do not match the corresponding
callouts of the previous Baldwin Park No.8 recorded Subdivision Plat. Please make the
necessary corrections to comply.
FP 04-030
Exhibit "A"
Baldwin Park Sub9 FP-04-069 Exhibit A
(
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 16, 2004
Page 4 of 5
16. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water
will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms
up to and including a 100-year storm event. (All areas being counted toward the 10%
open space amenity shall be free of "wet ponds" or other such nuisances).
17. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms ofthe approved preliminary
plat or development agreement does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for
compliance.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said
approval submitted to the Public Warks Department.
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. One-Hundred watt (lOOw), high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed
at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by
Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor shall obtain design and permit approval
from the Public Works Department prior to commencing installations.
4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
5. Sewer and water mains shall be extended to and through the proposed development,
thereby making services available for adjacent properties.
6. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying
that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the
highest established normal groundwater elevation.
7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Deputy Fire Chief
and the Public Works Department.
FP 04-030
Exhibit "A"
Baldwin Park Sub9 FP-04-069 Exhibit A
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 16, 2004
Page 5 of 5
8. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-S-2.K.
Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment
of mailbox structures.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Baldwin Park Subdivision No.9 with the above stated comments
and conditions.
FP 04-030
Exhibit "A"
Baldwin Park Sub9 FP-04-069 Exhibit A
NOV 12 2004 9:26AM
BRIGGS ENGINEERING
21/ . '1452950
!.
p.2
.~.
fJBIliQ$ SVGIN"""Ii, tDe.
ENGN:ERS/PLANNERS/~
1800 West Overland Road
Boise. Idaho 83105-3142
VoIce (208) 344~9700
Fax (208) 345-2950
stanm@briggs-englneering.com
WNW .briggawenglneoring.oom
November 111 2004 .
Mrs. Anna Canning
Meridian Planning and Zoning
660 E. Watertower Road
MeridiW1, Idaho 83642
RE: Baldwin Park #9
Dear Arm3.,
This is a.:request for dctcnnination that the final plat of Baldwin Park #9 is not a 'substantial change' from the
preliminary plat of Baldwin Park. Addition. After the approval of1hc preliminary plat the developer entered
into a license agreement with the Settlers Irrigation District forthe White Drain and the Coleman Lateral. The
Coleman Lateral has a 30' easement and the White Drain has a 60' easement These easements were shown as
common area on the preliminary plat (lots g & 91 block 17and lots 52 & 53, hlock 4). However, becaUIiC the
Coleman Lateral was parallel and adjacent to the White Drain. the Settl<rrs Irrigation District only required an
additional W\ rather than 30'.Also, the license agreement requires !:hat the 70' of easement for the White
Dnin and Coleman Lateral be fenced. (The Settlers Irrigation District fences their eoocments and locks out the
public.)
When you remove the areas oftbe w:bite Drain and Coleman Lateral, the common area of phases 8 & 9 has
more squme footage than is shown on the prelim.iru.tty piat. We suggest that lowering lhe White Drain
Ensement from 90' to 70' is not a substantial change from the preliminary plat. Also, there are three fewe.r lots
in phase 9 than is shown em the preliminary pint.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional il'lformation.t
ss~ M~
BRIGGS ENGINEBR..1NG, INC.
Stan McHutchison, P. E.
Project Manager
SLM:sm
co: Dave Yorg.ason
1:\2004\03\40308 ~ Baldwin Park #9\CQrnspondence\Out-gomg\C]tyMer.Canmng.1tr.doc
Exhibit "II"
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C November 3, 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF BRIGHTON )
CORPORATION FOR APPROVAL )
OF 3 SINGLE-FAMILY)
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS )
ON 4.5 ACRES IN AN R-4 ZONE, )
LOCATED EAST OF NORTH )
BLACK CAT ROAD AND NORTH )
OF WEST CHERRY LANE BEING )
A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 88, )
89, 90, AND 91, BLOCK 23 OF )
ASHFORD GREENS NO.2, )
LOCATED IN THE SW ~ OF T. 3N., )
R.IW., SECTION 3
CASE NO. FP-04-059
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on November 3, 2004, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 3, 2004, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.7
BEING A RESUBDIVSION OF LOTS 88, 89, 90, AND 91, BLOCK 23 OF
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.7 I (FP-04-059)
Page 1 of4
ASHFORD GREENS NO.2 IN THE SW y,j OF T. 3N., R. 1 W., SECTION 3 BOISE
MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2004, J:\ASHFORD GRNS #2
LLA- 04-010-01\Drawings\00_ASHFORD7 _PLAT.dwg 09/2912004 SHEET 1 OF
3, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 09/30/04, ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC,
BOISE, IDAHO, Brighton Corporation, Developer, is Conditionally Approved
subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the
Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning
and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for
the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 3, 2004, listing 8
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT, a true and correct copy of which
is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 2 pages, and by this
reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Engineering NorthWest,
LLC, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and
consisting of 1 page, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the additional
requirements from the action of the Council taken at their November 3,2004 meeting
as follows, to-wit:
1.1 Adopt the requirements of the Meridian Fire Department as
follows:
1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000
gallons per minute available for duration of2 hours to service the
entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400'
apart. International Fire Code Appendix D
2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the
Meridian Water Department.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.7 / (FP-04-059)
Page 2 of 4
3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the
Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shan have the 4 Yz" outlet face the main street
or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have
addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works
spec.
d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red
10' to each side of the hydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners.
f Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to
outlets within 10'.
4. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in
length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have
an turn-around.
5. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of28'
inside radius and 48 'outside radius.
6. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs
are required before combustible construction begins.
150'
building.
7. All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within
of a paved surface as measured around the perimeter of the
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULA TORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.7 / (FP-04-059)
Page 3 of 4
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek ajudicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3 ycl. day
of NOVe:IY\bc.v
,2004.
Attest:
1\\\111111(1/11
\,11 C ~l!,t:-....IIII B'
,\", --\ 0. nls'-II!D. 11;,/.; y.
,.::. {-. '4 /~
:;:-.::- 0 o'RPo/1',:j):: ~ ~
~ ...() ~^ ...
:.:: ~ v ~
- -
- -
'." -
J~,~
William G. Berg, Jr.,
Copy served upon Applicant, the PlalUling and Zoning Department, Public Works Department, and
City Attorney.
By: <~1tJ\ OJ""'.
City Clerk's Office
Dated: \ l- 24-041
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.7 / (FP-04-059)
Page 4 of4
i
"
MAYOR
Tanuny de Weerd
~ P / CITY OF ..--.. -,!
VVLerldiati.~
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . Fax 466-4405
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donnell
Shaun Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
IDAHO
......J
'{~\(1
'I
\'
V
~
)
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DE? ARTM ENT
(208) 884-5533 . FAX 888-6854
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing Date: November 3, 2004
To:
Mayor and City Council
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner ()4
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager~
Ashford Greens Subdivision No.7
From:
Re:
Final Plat approval of Three (3) Single-Family Residential Building Lots on 0.45
Acres in an R-4 Zone by Brighton Corporation (File No. FP-04-059).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Brighton Corporation, has applied for Final Plat approval of 3 single-family
residential building lots on 0.45 acre ofland for Ashford Greens Subdivision No.7. This is a re-
subdivision of Lots 88, 89, 90, and 91, Block 23, of Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2. The
existing zoning designation for this subdivision is R-4 (Low Density Residential).
This phase of Ashford Greens Subdivision is located east ofN. Black Cat Road and north ofW.
Cherry Lane, in the SW ~ of Section 3, T.3N., R.l W.
The applicant filed for, and received approval on October 5, 2004, for their requested vacation of
the existing public utilities, drainage and irrigation easements on Lots 43-45, and Lots 88-91,
Block 23 of Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2.
The submitted final plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat. There is one
lot less on the final plat than was approved on the preliminary plat; however, staff has no
objection to this change.
Staff reconunends approval of Ashford Green Subdivision No. 7 with the comments and
conditions stated in this report.
FP-04-059
Exhibit "A"
Ashford Greens Sub 7 FP-04-059 Exhibit A
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 3, 2004
Page 2
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved Annexation, Preliminary Plat, and
Conditional Use Permit for this subdivision.
2. Fencing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
3. Label the "Real Point of Beginning" on the face of the plat.
4. Revise or add the following notes on the face of the plat:
(1.) ".. .public right-of-way line tl:zd the exte,"far subdi}'isian bounckuy have a ten..."
(4.) "Each side of interior lot lines and along the northerly side of Lot 3 and the
southerly side of Lot 1. Block 32 shall have a five-foot..."
(7.) Bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above
the highest established normal groundwater elevation.
(8.) "Buildinf! setbacks and dimensional standards in this subdivision shall be in
compliance with Title 11 and Title 12 of the Meridian City Code unless otherwise
modified bv Conditional Use Permit "
(Setbacks for Block 33) Delete the side yard setbacks that deal with comer lots since there
are none in this phase.
4. The applicant has indicated that the pressure irrigation system within this development is
existing. Service locations shall be adjusted to the new lot configuration.
5. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via the existing mains adjacent to the
proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to provide a plan to the Public
Works Department detailing the abandomnent of, or installation of new sanitary sewer
and water services. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant
shall either complete the construction detailed above, or post surety for 110% of the
construction costs.
6. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
7. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
8. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms ofthe previous approvals for
this subdivision does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the above stated comments and conditions.
FP-04-059
Exhibit "A"
Ashford Greens Sub 7 FP-04-059 Exhibit A
Enf(ineerinK North West, LLC
423 N. Ancestor Place. Suite I &0 Boise, Idaho 83704
(208) 176-5QQ(}. Fllx (20&) 376-5556
November 3, 2004
Ms. Anna Canning
Meridian CitY. Planning Department
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID &3642
.
Via E-mail: canninga@meridlancity.org
Re:
Ashford Greens Subdivision No.7: FP-04-059
Ashford Greens Subdivision No.8: FP-04-060
t.
Dear Ms. Canning:
1 am writing on behalf of my client, Brighton Corporation, concerning the above
referenced subdivisions.
It is my understanding that they are before City Council tonight [or approval ofthc final
plats.
Please accept this notification that Brighton is in agreement with the conditions of
approval as outlined in your memo to Council for tonight's hearing, In addition, I have
attached with this letter a reduced copy of the plats depicting the requested revisions.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
7L-1U:it
C;;;ne P. Smi~.E.
Cc: Brad Watson, Meridian City Engineer
Will Berg, Meridian City Clerk
David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation
Exhlbll "W
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C November 3, 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF BRIGHTON )
COPORATION FOR APPROVAL )
OF 2 SINGLE-FAMILY )
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS )
ON .34 ACRES IN AN R-4 ZONE, )
LOCATED EAST OF NORTH )
BLACK CAT ROAD AND NORTH )
OF WEST CHERRY LANE BEING )
A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 43, )
44, AND 45, BLOCK 23 OF )
ASHFORD GREENS NO.2 IN THE )
SW 1;4 OFT. 3N., R.IW., SECTION 3 )
CASE NO. FP-04-060
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on November 3, 2004, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 3,2004, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLA T SHOWING ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO.8
BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 43, 44, AND 45, BLOCK 23 OF ASHFORD
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDNISION NO. 8/ (FP-04-060)
Page 1 of 4
GREENS NO. 2 IN THE SW y,j OF T. 3N., R. 1 W., SECTION 3, BOISE
MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2004, J:\ASHFORD GRNS #2
LLA 04-010-01\Drawings\\00_ASHFORD8_PLAT.DWG 09/2912004,
HANDWRITTEN DATE: 09/3012004, SHEET 1 OF 3, ENGINEERING
NORTHWEST, LLC, BOISE, IDAHO, Brighton Corporation, Developer, is
Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in
the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City
Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Development
Services Manager for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: November
3,2004, listing 9 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 2
pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from
Engineering NorthWest, LLC, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto
marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 1 page, and by this reference incorporated
herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION NO. 8/ (FP-04-060)
Page 2 of4
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULA TORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date ofthis decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
3v-d
By action ofthe City Council at its regular meeting held on the day
of N (We mbc..v
, 2004.
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Warks Department, and
City Attorney.
By:J~ L
City Clerk's Office
Dated:
l"Z -ll- -C4
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDNISION NO. 8/ (FP-04-060)
Page 4 of4
f
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
olfe;;di;;t,.,"\
A IDAHO/}
~~ /
Cr..
"\'~i:It. . ."
11;( fflEASUlll'. V.~
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 .Fax 466-4405
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donnell
Shaull Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533. FAX 888-6854
SIIir;f
\ 1903
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing Date: November 3, 2004
To:
Mayor and City Council
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner (...1.11..
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager~
Ashford Greens Subdivision No.8
From:
Re:
Final Plat approval of Two (2) Single-Family Residential Building Lots on 0.34
Acres in an R-4 Zone by Brighton Corporation (File No. FP-04-060).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Brighton Corporation; has applied for Final Plat approval of 2 single-family
residential building lots on 0.34 acre of land for Ashford Greens Subdivision No.8. This is a re-
subdivision of Lots 43; 44, and 45, Block 23, of Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2. The existing
zoning designation for this subdivision is R-4 (Low Density Residential).
This phase of Ashford Greens Subdivision is located east ofN. Black Cat Road and north ofW.
Cherry Lane, in the SW l,4 of Section 3, T.3N., R.IW.
The applicant filed for, and received approval on October 5, 2004, for their requested vacation of
the existing public utilities, drainage and irrigation easements on Lots 43-45, and Lots 88-91;
Block 23 of Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2.
The submitted final plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat. There is one
lot less on the final plat than was approved on the preliminary plat; however, staff has no
objection to this change.
Staff recommends approval of Ashford Green Subdivision No. 8 with the comments and
conditions stated in this report.
FP-04-060
Exhibit "An
Ashford Greens Sub8 FP.doc
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: November 3, 2004
Page 2
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved Annexation, Preliminary Plat, and
Conditional Use Permit for this subdivision.
2. Fencing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
3. Revise or add the following notes on the face of the plat:
(1.) H. . .public right-of-way line and ~/zc cxtcrio;- subdh;isio,'q, bounds;'}' have a ten..."
(4.) "Each side of interior lot lines and alon~ the northerly side of Lot 3 and the
southerly side of Lot I. Block 32 shall have a five-foot..."
(7.) Bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of i2-inches above
the highest established normal groundwater elevation.
(8.) "Building setbacks and dimensional standards in this subdivision shall be in
compliance with Title I I and Title 12 of the Meridian City Code unless otherwise
modified bv Conditional Use Permit "
(Setbacks for Block 33) Delete the side yard setbacks that deal with comer lots since there
are none in this phase.
4. The applicant has indicated that the pressure irrigation system within this development is
existing. Service locations shall be adjusted to the new lot configuration.
5. Label the "Real Point of Beginning" on the face of the plat.
6. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via the existing mains adjacent to the
proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to provide a plan to the Public
Works Department detailing the abandonment of, or installation of new sanitary sewer
and water services. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant
shall either complete the construction detailed above, or post surety for 110% of the
construction costs.
7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
8. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
9. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms of the previous approvals for
this subdivision does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the above stated comments and conditions.
FP-04-060
Exhibit "A"
Ashford Greens Sub8 FP .doc
/.
\,'.
EnKineering NorthWest, LLC
423 N. Ances\OIP\ace, Suite ISO BOlse,idaho 33704
(20B) 376-5000 . Fux (20&) 376-5556
November 3, 2004
Ms. Anna Canning
Meridian CItY Planning Department
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, In 83642
..
Via E-mail; canninga@meridiancity.org
Re: Ashford Greens Suhdivision No.7: FP-04-0S9
Ashford Greens Subdivision No.8: FP-04-060
"
Dear Ms. Canning:
I am writing on behalf of my client, Brighton Corporation, conceming the above
referenced subdivisions.
'.
It is my understanding that they are before City Council tonight for approval ofthc final
plats.
Please accept this notification that Brighton is in agreement with the conditions of
approval as outlined in your memo to Council for tonight's hearing. In addition, I have
attached with this letter a reduced copy ofllie plat~ depicting the requested revisions.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~
~le P. smi~.E.
Cc: Brad Watson, Meridian City Engineer
Will Berg, Meridian City Clerk
David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation
Exhibit "13"