HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-03-23
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X' Shaun Wardle )( Bill Nary
-----x- Charlie Rountree ')C Keith Bird
k' Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~I/"'-<...-'
3. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b):
("'20 minutes) ftA? Ct.e.C/jf~ ~<<-tU.-
4. Review of Computer Surplus Resolution: _
("5 minutes) S'ei Of'\. l'lL'lCt c~ 1--:; c~cJ., fL~.'\...J
5. Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian
by Steve Sedlecek with SSC: ;U"- ~ / f1..o/7~ k-.- /0 / Iv
("5 minutes)
6. Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City: _
(*10 minutes) d/rCf-lSrRd - frt-o CiPh-7nb.."fJrnJ
7. Update I Discussion of Emplovee Compensation - Pauline Skeggs
and Stacy Kilchenmann: -
("'20 minutes) d/.JCrUaed - 2'1']..:1J", /vtc.-t.eak:" fo a-<< Rr>->;Koyaf
'" Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a gui.delina only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - M~rch 9, 2004 Page 1 of 1"
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
.il'::!!'
.,.,~~"., ~r()
~'1'_.'~.-f<,~ (.~,~
~~'.,~_~, _ _. ':GCf.. -'~
cM;;;;di;~~'l.~ .
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shaun Wardle
William L. M. Nary
Charles M. Rountree
Keith Bird
IDAHO
'.
"
"
V
I
Y
pi
qlHCE
, 11903
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 . Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887- I 297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 ,Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 ' Fax 888-6854
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCil MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council meeting as
well as the following issues:
Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b)
Review of Computer Surplus Resolution
Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian by Steve
Sedlecek with SSC
Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the Prosecution Contract
with Boise City
Update / Discussion of Employee Compensation
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 19th of March, 2004.
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE' IvIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642. (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42] 8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
March 18, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 23, 2004
ITEM NO.
.J;,
REQUEST Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1} (b)
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
March 18, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 23, 2004
ITEM NO.
to
REQUEST Discussion on Juvenile Accountability Program through the prosecution contract
with Boise City
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shatJ become property oJ the City of Meridian.
March 18, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 23, 2004
ITEM NO.
7
REQUEST Update I Discussion of Employee Compensation - Pauline Skeggs and Stacy
Kilchenmann
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See previous Item Packet
See attached
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
E
ro
...
0>
e
Q..
C/)
:::l
C;
o
CO
'<:t
o
o
N
>-
LL
4-
o
(j)
o
()
~~ ~ 2
%~~en
E~:.S8
w-+Je
Q
Q
It)
N
w-
Q
Q
Q
N
w-
Q
Q
~
...
w-
Q
Q
~
...
w-
Q
Q
It)
w-
Q
Q
00
~
la;g
"iti=.c
.... 0 III
{!. ~ LI..
lll'O
a.
'E
:J
o
E
III
'"
:J
c:
o
aI
l-
ff)
o
U
...J
~
o
I-
...J
~
o
f0-
lD
:J
f/)
~
o
"0
2!
i5
'0<1>
xO)
<1;l C
:2.&.
0)
C
'50)
C C
(ij~
- ro
-So:::
o
.!!JO)
<1> C
u=
x <1;l
wo:::
c
~g'
Co:+::;
~&.
o
~
o
~.~
..... -
en <1;l
'fijo:::
C1)
c:
,2
C.
'i:
<)
'"
III
Cl
l'-
Q
l'-:.
....
It)
l'- en 't
00 MOO
en 0 "I
cri M ro
M .... It)
l'- It) en (Q
to 0 M 'I"""
o CIl 0 'C"'"
ro .n N oi"
o ~ -0 (0
"I <0 0 (Q
~~~~;~
o:t .., .... o:t
Q 0 0
Q Q Q
o . It) c:;.
.n N.n
....
Q 0
o Q
o 0 . .
N cri
o
o
Co I I I
M
o
Q
~
.....
.....
o 0
o 0
o 0
.n .n N
Q
o
Q
<0
Q Q
o Q
Q ~
...f
o
Q
o
N
Q Q
o Q
~ ~-
o:t o:t l'- .....
en "I "I It)
It) en <0 o:t
ro en" cri 't-
~ ::J ~ ~
"1- N
...J
~
o
....
'C
c:
:J
LI..
"iti
...
III
c:
III
c:l
...J
...J ~ ~
~ ~ 0
o 'C l-
I- c: 'C
tIl :J c:
tii LI.. :J
<) <) LI..
!E > 8:
o CI) 'i:
III "iti c.
.~ '0 i
o ~ 'E
a. CI) w
Q
o
o
Q
Q
Q
Lt'J
.....
l'-
Q
<5
(Q
.....
<0
't
.....
IO-
N
en
(Q
<0
...f
M
....
Q
Q
Lt'J
N
"I
Q
Q
~
<0
Q
o
o
M
Q
o
o
N
o:t
E
e
4-
'0
III
'0
:::l
U
X
III
c:
Q)
Q)
.0
Q)
>
ro
;:::
f/J
...
.ill
;:::
0>
;;:::
3 ~
~U;LL
co (l,) C;
~"O ,2
Z~
Q
Q
Q
en
"I
o
Q
Q
t-:
M
l()
..,
...f
N
co
t-:
(/)
...J
~
o
....
e
z
<(
0:::
C)
o
';::
(j)
c;
(j)
U
C/)
m
:s
f/J
(j)
C/)
ro
~
U
.~
0..
(j)
(j)
'0
C
ro
(J)
:::l
c;
o
.0
(j)
:s
"ffi
...
.2
(\)
U
c
ro
....
:::l
(J)
.~
g
:0
ro
(J)
'5
'0
C
ro
U)
0::
ill
Q..
<("
()
u:::
(J)
'0
:::l
U
c;
(J)
(J)
x
11
~
o
a.
E
ill
'<:t
o
o
N
en
N
N
4-
o
(J)
ro
0::
I
c:
'0
-u
~
~
(j)
'S;
(j)
...
e
~
...
:::l
U
(j)
o
E
(J)
Q)
~
o
a.
E
(J)
.c
U
ro
(J)
.:.::
o
.9
(J)
~
f/J
0>
c;
CO
....
(j)
;:::
-
...
o
LL
III
f/J
ro
III
...
U
C
0..
(J)
......
C/)
'#.
LC:!
N
(J)
;:::
-
...
.2
Q)
0>
'0
:::l
.0
(J)
E
t
(\)
>
o
Q)
,S!
o
0..
(\)
:s
'0
III
f/J
ro
(J)
...
U
C
(\)
s:
C;
(\)
(J)
..0
(j)
>
ro
..c
(J)
:::l
c:
o
.0
o
o
o
N
(fi
III
:s
...
.2
~
ro
:::l
0-
I-
a
z
'0
'5
rn
:s
(j)
0>
C
~
...
'm C;
:s~
4-0..
o (J)
E 2
:::l 0
ED
'x g
roo
E......
(\)(fi
..co
......0
......1.0
rofh
(J) III
(\);:::
~-
o c
a.:;
E III
(J)'O
(\).2
;::: 0
I- ,~
(J)
'0
c;
:::l
4-
ro
...
.2~mu;;!
'<:tl'-C')......,
...... ...fMcrlt-:
C') N N l()
r-:
1.0
(fi
(\)
.0 en
:!2 -0.
:::l E ...J
oo.Q)g'l~
~ <D ~ 2 0
(j) Ci5 C ....
m
ro
.0
I.{)
o
>-
LL
Q)
:s
,~
(J)
(J)
ro
(j)
.8 t5
III .~
~'O
~ ,~
U ro
c :::l
c;
ro c;
"0 ro
......
ro
1?"O
1-1-
III
tIl
<tl
III
...
<)
.5
III
tIl
<tl
.c
ai
t:ll
'C
:J
.c
'0
(J)
......0>
m c;
o ro
o...c
(\) U
(j) (J) >>
tn ro (\)
rolll;:::
lll.........
LU~
g,~ (\)
,- ~ (J)
~roro
(l,) ~ "ffi ~
gj ~ m al
~'#.~;:
g I.{) ro (J)
-NWc;
~ (\) > ro
ro..c:ro'O
m-;;1?~
(I)-I-C;
~ '0 .~ f/J
:O~a5w5
('oj g, ~ ~~
<ll E ~ (\) .0
J::ouQ)E
....uQ)>c:
O(J)'Oroo
-ro >>..c: 0
~~g,~ffi
~~Q)Eo.
Q.rocQ).......
E (\) ro Q) c;
OG >>(j)
uc;Q).QE
.- u 0. III
~Ea5E:5
III :::l ';:: Q) III
~E&c:~
(JQ)x<(O
CO.(\) c
_(\)~'#.ro
1./1 0 >>r--o.
o c;.Q"-: X
O~o..mQ)
8~Ero-'::
c: ,~ (\) ~ (J)
E: f/J c; Q) ,5_
~ _ ro f/J
1./I~:-Q~t5
oS 15' '0 G -6
Q) a. ~ ,~ ~
~EroE
o (\) U :::l ~
0..;::: 0 'E ~
E~Z(\)Q)
wwE a..:s
'<:t
o
o
N
00
......
-...
C')
April 15, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
April 20, 2004
ITEM No.5. D
REQUEST Approve minutes of March 23, 2004 Pre-Council Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POUCE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
,v
~V
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Bill Nary
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b): No Decision
(*20 minutes)
4. Review of Computer Surplus Resolution: Set on next City Council
Agenda
(*5 minutes)
5. Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian
by Steve Sedlecek with SSC: Place I Notice for Public Hearing
(*5 minutes)
6. Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City: Discussed - No contribution
(*10 minutes)
7. Update J Discussion of Employee Compensation - Pauline Skeggs
and Stacy Kilchenmann: Discussed - 2 % percent increase to all
employees
(*20 minutes)
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - March 9, 2004 Page 1 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8864433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
* Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - March 9, 2004 Page 2 of 2
All materials presented at pubflc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Pre-Council MeetinQ
March 23. 2004
The Meridian City Pre-Council meeting was called to order at 6:03 P.M. on
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Bill Nary, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle
and Charlie Rountree.
Staff Present: Chris Gabbert, Will Berg, Bill Musser, Gary Smith and Kenny
Bowers.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Bill Nary X Keith Bird
X Shaun Wardle X Charlie Rountree
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Bird: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we adopt the agenda as published.
Rountree: Second.
Nary: Moved and seconded to adopt the Agenda as published. All those in favor
say aye.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Bird: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we go into Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1 )(b).
Rountree: Second.
Nary: Moved and seconded to go into Executive Session. Mr. Berg, take roll.
De Weerd: Mr. President.
Nary: Madame Mayor.
Meridian City Pre~CounciI lVleeting
March 23, 2004
Page 2 of?
De Weerd: I would like if we could come in and ask (inaudible) to join us
(inaudible).
Nary: Okay.
ROLL CALL: Bird, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye; Nary, aye.
Item 3.
Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b):
Nary: We can reconvene our Pre-Council meeting. I would accept a motion to
leave Executive Session.
Rountree: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Nary: Moved and seconded to leave Executive Session. All those in favor, say
aye. No final decisions were made.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 4.
Review of Computer Surplus Resolution:
Nary: Council, all we need to do is if it looks okay go ahead and let it go on the
Agenda next week. If there is any objection -
Bird: I have no objection.
Rountree: No objection.
Nary: So asked. (inaudible name given) if you could communicate that to Mr.
Nichols to go ahead and put that on in two weeks on our regular agenda.
Item 5.
Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of
Meridian by Steve Sedlecek with SSC:
Nary: Expanded roll off services, Item NO.5 is only necessary for -- again, any
discussion, if any, Mr. Sedlecek was not able to be here this evening. It would
need to be for a public hearing anyway. Unless Council has objection we can go
ahead and have that scheduled within three or four weeks. Proper noticing has
to be out.
Bird: Let's go for it.
Rountree: Let's get them done.
Meridian City Pre-Council. Meeting
March 23, 2004
Page 3 of?
Nary: All right. So, no objection we will go ahead and move forward with that.
Item 6.
Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City:
Nary: The Juvenile Accountability program, they have been requested from the
City of Boise for the Juvenile Accountability program - it's part of the prosecution
contract. In this last year there was some amount that was contributed by the
City. We didn't know the specific dollar amount, but they are reapplying for this
grant and at least the information I had and I asked the Chief to look at that as
well that the level of service for the City of Meridian is pretty low and it was a
passed through grant, but also there was some match on the City's part. In the
last fiscal year 36 juveniles received service through this program and I thought
the amount that was contributed was $1,500. I don't know if it was more or less
than that. That was the figure that I recalled and the juvenile coordinator couldn't
recall the amount. For 36 kids in this program that seems not a real good value
than what we are getting. Most of these programs - most of the juvenile
accountability is being handled already by the Police Department. So, what was
being asked by the coordinator for this program was whether or not we wish to
participate in the grant again or not. Does Council have a preference as to what
we would communicate back to them? If we are going to continue to do it, we
are going to have to partially fund it and it appears that, I guess, as bottom line
it's not really providing a tremendous amount of service to our youth. Most of our
youth are getting these issues of juvenile crimes that can be dealt with already by
the Police Department pretty extensively through the SRO's and the Police.
Honestly, a lot of juvenile crime that gets committed by Meridian residents gets
committed in Boise and gets dealt with by the program that's already in Boise.
Rountree: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Could we get a word from Chief Musser on that?
Nary: Certainly. Chief, I didn't mean to speak for you. I was trying to hurry a
little bit because we were running late.
Musser: Mr. President, members of the Council in regards to this we had done
some discussion. I made some contact as well with the Juvenile Accountability
folks and verified the numbers that they had provided at an earlier time. Matter
of fact it was in the first quarterly report, which is dated from October to
December of 2003 that Roger Cockerille in the City Attorney's office over in
Boise had presented to the Council that was seated during that time. This would
have been prior to the January council that is currently in. Councilman Nary is
absolutely right when he says we only had 36 total participants on that during
Meridian City Pre-Councillvfeeting
March 23, 2004
Page 4 of?
that time. Out of that it's been a half and half. Sixteen of them are still in the
program, sixteen have completed and then we have had two that weren't able to
complete the program. For the amount of juveniles that we have hear locally, it
doesn't really seem to be meeting our needs as well as it could be at this point. I
also did some checking while I was over at the Courthouse last week. Part of
what we run into on that is that a good portion of our kids, if they go out and have
problems with alcohol or tobacco issues, for some reason or another, they seem
to occur over in Boise down around Main Street - that area where the drag
usually occurs, so the jurisdiction usually ends of taking on those citations
because this is geared specifically towards alcohol and tobacco violations. We
don't have that many here and those that we usually have usually run through
other diversion programs that we have that also work through the Juvenile
Correction.
Rountree: Thank you.
Musser: You're welcome.
Nary: Anyway, Council, it was more of a discussion item if you want us to
communicate back with Boise and tell them we don't want to participate or if we
do want to participate.
Bird: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I believe that the money that was from that was from a federal grant or
something, wasn't it?
Nary: The City had a local match requirement. Most of the money was a grant
actually through the Associations of Idaho Cities and then we had a small portion
of that with the match. I could be wrong on the $1,500 amount, but there was a
portion we had to match. The first year we didn't, Boise actually paid it the first
year. The second year we did match.
Bird: Okay, I like the second year that we didn't have to. I don't think it's
something that we need.
Nary: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I agree with your comments and appreciate the Chiefs comments.
Sounds to me like it's not all that valuable. So, I don't know if we need a motion
or just convey to the City of Boise that we are not going to continue participation.
Meridian City Pre-Counci11\1eeting
March 23, 2004
Page 5 of?
Nary: I think we can communicate back to them by letter or something through
the Mayor's office or whatever they need. If Council is all right with that, we
could do that.
Item 7.
Update I Discussion of Emplovee Compensation - Pauline
Skeggs and Stacy Kilchenmann:
Bird: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I'll try to get a motion going on this. I believe after our meeting in there that
we would like to go 2.5 percent across the board for all employees effective
March 2004. That was the consensus I got out of Council when we was in there,
I believe and if we need - or if we can do it in a motion at this point we will if not
we can do it at the regular meeting and get this thing over with and done with.
It's still 2.5 percent as I recall for all employees as of January 1, 2004. Is that
right? What was the date?
Rountree: March 2004.
Bird: Okay, the March pay period.
Nary: Is that a motion Mr. Bird?
Bird: That is a motion.
Rountree: I will second that.
Nary: There has been a motion and a second to authorize a 2.5 percent
increase to the employees' payroll as of the March pay period and that would be
all employees other than the one's that have already been pre-determined in the
step program, but that's all included the 2.5. Is there other discussion?
De Weerd: Mr. President.
Nary: Madame Mayor.
De Weerd: I guess in looking at the intent of Council and past practices that the
merit increase across the board seems in line with what has traditionally been
done. I guess what I would like to see and I will work with our HR Director is to
come up with a merit program and a better evaluation process that will make it
easier to reward those employees that have meritorious performance and we will
have that in place prior to budget negotiations or the budget workshops. So, the
HR Director and I will work on that as well as with the rest of the team, the
directors.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 23, 2004
Page 6 of7
Wardle: Mr. President.
Nary: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Also, I would just like to clarify for the discussion whether that 2.5
percent would include those employees that had reached the cap of their pay
scale?
Bird: Yes.
Nary: So, that would be all employees, including those that are at the top end of
their pay scale and don't get any merit increases currently.
De Weerd: And the new employees.
Nary: Those that are on the payroll currently.
Bird: As of March.
Nary: As of this March pay period. I guess I would echo the comment of the
Mayor. You know I had hoped we'd have a better way to really reward merit
performance and we don't have that yet and I am hoping that in our next budget
we will have a better way to identify that better and reward merit, along with other
types of incentives for employees. We don't have that ability right now, so I think
this is probably the fairest way for the employees to be compensated, but
hopefully in the future we will have more information and be able to do that. Any
other comments Council? Mr. Berg would you call roll?
Roll Call: Bird, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye; Nary, aye. All approved.
Nary: That is the last item on our agenda, so I would take a motion to adjourn
the Pre-Council meeting.
Rountree: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Nary: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn the Pre-Council meeting. All
those in favor say aye.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:16 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
Meridian City pte-Counci\ N'1eetlng
Match 2.3, 2.001\-
Page 7 of1
,. AMW\'f OE
if: J /}P~
~PROVED
APPROVEO-.
,
,
,
...
.-
.-
P\eG5c ~i. '.t ~r ?u'o\ \~ NO-flee.. =-r{rz/,"\'l.S)~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCil MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23J 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle _ Bill Nary
Charlie Rountree _ Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b):
(*20 minutes)
4. Review of Computer Surplus Resolution:
("'5 minutes)
5. Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian
by Steve Sedlecek with sse:
(*5 minutes)
6. Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City:
(*10 minutes)
7. Update I Discussion of Emplovee Compensation - Pauline Skeggs
and Stacy Kilchenmann= '
(*20 minutes)
* Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may chang.e-,depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a gui.d~lme only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - M~rch 9, 2004 Page 1 of l'
All materia Is presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
MAYOR
Tummy de Weerd
YLJIl~G (ost ivy YtJblt'G(^)oi1'~- 7/rJc1Ylf;~[
. s. ~. ' ...
c ",:;'- .. -::,'] LEGAL DEPARTMENT
,.~f',.. 1f~ (208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405
oW;;;di:~c~t.\ (2ts~~!~~;~F:;~::Oliol
I IDAHO :: (208) 898.5500 . Fax 887-1297
~1'''' ,?,} BUILDING DEPARTMENT
~ / (208) 887-2211. Fax 887-1297
-~v~ ()
!IF<. <I, TREASURE V~" . , SI',CE PLANNING & ZONING
, \ 1903
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shaun Wardle
William L. M. Nary
Charles M. Rountree
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council meeting as
well as the following issues:
Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b)
Review of Computer Surplus Resolution
Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian by Steve
Sedlecek with SSC
Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the Prosecution Contract
with Boise City
Update / Discussion of Employee Compensation
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
.\\\1111111111/1/
\'\' ..- hll!:, Jill
........,... ~l 0, Wid.:::l?/r. 11//
....\.' ~""\ 'Vi.? -::',
0::-.... c} :pPO,Q~ -'1-+.~
..:- ~C,o ''''fr~ S
g ~ 0 S
- -
, ~ ~ 4 (SEAL ~
~4/h~~ /t7'. / ~b/t. .t;. ';P/'. f'J
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - crr~ I) ~ "CJG
~;. () O's, 1S1 '
.-- '1
',. 1-; \0' "
~ /,,' -'>4 '(~~~.r\}T\" -; ~ ~ \\,"- \."
.,',\
'. .' )j"
DATED this 19th of March, 2004.
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE 0 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 836420 (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42[8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
(
** TX c( ~MATION REPORT ** AS OF MAR 19 '04 1".03 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE M1WSEC PGS CMDll STATUS
14 03/19 17:44 3810160 EC--S 00'35" 001 213 OK
15 03/19 17'45 PUBL!C WORKS EC--5 00'25" 001 213 OK
16 03/19 17: 46 120846644135 EC--S 00'26" 001 213 OK
17 03/19 17:47 8841159 EC--5 00'27" 001 213 OK
18 03/19 17'48 2088848744 EC--S 80'26" 001 213 OK
19 03/19 17:49 POLICE DEPT EC--S 00'26" 001 213 OK
2eI 03/19 17:50 8985501 EC--S 00'25" 001 213 OK
21 03/19 17'51 LIBRARY EC--S 00'30" 001 213 OK
22 03/19 17:52 92083776449 EC--S 00'25" 001 213 OK
23 03/19 17:53 208 388 6924 EC--S 00'30" 001 213 OK
24 03/19 17'54 2086886854 EC--S 00'25" 001 213 OK
25 133/19 17:55 AlL I'lMERICAN INS EC--S 08'25" 001 213 OK
26 03/19 17:56 208 895 0390 EC--S e0'25" eal 213 OK
27 03/19 17:57 128300040 G3--5 00' 28" 1301 213 OK
28 133/19 17'58 ,W8 387 6393 EC--S 00' 25" 001 213 OK
29 03/19 17:59 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC--S 130'25" 001 213 OK
30 133/19 18:00 888Ses2 EC--$ 00'25" 001 213 OK
31 03/19 18:131 CHERRY LANE G3--$ 00'43" 0131 213 OK
32 03/19 18:02 POST OFFICE EC--S 00'35" 001 213 OK
MAYOR
'r~I\'\my de W.etd
YlUL~l, {DSt toY yub/t'C,. No'hC(..,- I/fJoYlJ;,&'
~ .
,\i;J LEGAL OorARTMEm
\ .~ (203) 6fiG.92n. PAX 466.4405
~,~~~
olfe;;d/:~" "~; '. t,
\ "
IDAHO t
'" ./
~..sf-""''<'..I~~'~~-:f
~~3
~AltKS & REGRl!ATJON
(20&) SS5.3S1~' F:u 395.$50)
PUB~IC WORKS
(lOB) 898.SS00. FA.< SS,.ll'J1
llUI~DING DEPARTMENT
[20S) 887.2211 . F" ~~?ll?7
PLANNING &. ZONING
aOB) 884.S533 . Pox ~S6'GSS'
CITY COUNCil. MEMBERS
Sh.un W",ale
Willb", L. M. Nary
Charl<< M. RounD"
[(till> BIrd
NOTICE OF PRE.COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
wm hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Half, 33 East IdahO, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled Oity Council meeting as
well as the following issues:
Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b)
Review of Computer Surplus Resolution
Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian by Steve
Sedlecak with SSC
Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the Prosecution Contract
with Boise City
Update / Discussion of Employee Compensation
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 19'. of March, 2004.
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDiAN, IDAHO 83642 . (20S} 888.4433
City Clork Offio. Fa., (208) ~8S-4218 . Hum"" ResIltlrccs PO)( (2~S) 884-8723 . Fioooc< & Utility Mling F.. (20&) 887-4813
** TX CONFI. i TI ON REPORT **
AS OF MAR 19 '04 17:31 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
24 03/19 17:21 3810160
25 03/19 17:22 PUBLIC WORKS
27 03/19 17:26 121384664405
28 03/19 17:27 8941159
29 03/19 17:27 2088840744
30 133/19 17:29 POLICE DEPT
31 03/19 17:30 8985501
32 03/19 17:30 LIBRARY
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDl=l STATUS
EC--5 00'31" 001 212 OK
EC--S 013' 22" 001 212 OK
EC--S 00'22" 0131 212 OK
EC--5 00'22" 001 212 OK
EC--S 00'21" 001 212 OK
EC--S 00'22" 001 212 OK
EC--S 00'21" 001 212 OK
EC--S 00'24" 001 212 OK
------------------------------~-------------~-----------------------------------------------
AeaSt: ?os+ ~(\=lth\ic.. NoHec Th(l(\'lS)}
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE~COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle _ Bill Nary
_ Charlie Rountree _ Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67~2346(1 )(b):
(*20 minutes}
4. Review of Computer SUI'J))us Resolution:
eS minutes)
5. Requ813t to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian
by Steve Sedlecek with SSC:
(*5 minutes}
6. Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City:
(*10 minutes)
7. Update I Discussion of Emplovee Compensati.9u. - Pauline Skeggs
.emd Stacy Kilchenmann:
1[*20 minutes)
"Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change-.depending on
discutlsion. Plea.se use the designated minutes as a gui.cJe:IiIl~ only.
Meridian City Pre-Council Agenaa - Milrch 9. 2004 Pll!le 1 of"
AU materIals preGented at public meeting!; &hall become propsrly of the C~y of Meridian.
A1Iyons dtrClring occommodll\lon fCl1'dlQbllllleG related 10 documents and/or hearlngli
pleats contacllhe City ClerK'a Offica at eSa-4433 allellS! 4lll1oun; prior to Ihe public rrn>eling.
** TX CONF IR,., " ION REPORT **
AS OF MAR 19 '04 18:G7 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DRTE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMNt STRTUS
01 03/19 18:03 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00'26" 001 213 OK
02 03/19 18:04 887 0816 G3--S 00'42" 001 213 OK
03 03/19 18:06 tD PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00'25" 001 213 OK
04 03/19 18:07 2088886701 EC--S 00'24" 001 213 OK
----------~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAYOR
T~mmy de Weei'd
YLLll~l- (ost feY tlJ~I(C No'1lLt-- I0aYJI;s.I.
,,,;),"
,-
.I'&i l"
clfe;;dl~ii4\; -' 1,
\ ,I
. ID....HO j'
~~ t,;. ../
~~il.." _ r~ J'i
~~-<':UR~~~:~
LE(iA ,. DEPARTMENT
(208) 466.92n . FAX 466.44IlS
PARKS &. RECReATION
(208) 888-3579 . Fax 898.,550l
PUBLIC WORKS
(2(l8) 898.5500' F~ 8$7.12')7
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shoun W:trdle
Willirun L, M. Nary
Ch~rl~, M. R(lunu'~
Kei[h Bird
lJUILDtNG DEPARTMENT
(208) 887.22;11 . F~x 1;87.1297
PLANNING & ZON1NCi
(208) 8S4.SS33 . Fax 8S8-V854
NOTICE OF PRE~COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council meeting as
well as the following issues:
Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(b)
Review of Computer Surplus Resolution
Request to provide expanded roll off seMces to the City of Maridian by Steve
Sedlacek with SSC
Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the Prosecution Contract
with Boise City
Update / Discussion of Employee Compensation
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 19th of March, 2004.
J."
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE . MERIDTAN, IDAHO 83642 . (208) 888-4433
City Clt:rk OWce Fa~ (208) 888-42 IS . Hum:m R~sourccs Fax (208) 884-8723 . finanCe & 1JrilltY Billing Fnx (208) 887.4813
/
(
"'* TX CO~., (FlTlON REPORT ** FlS OF MAR 19 '04 1'7:43 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE: TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDIt STATUS
01 03/19 1'7:31 92083'776449 EC--S eB'22" 001 212 OK
02 03/19 17:32 2B8 388 6924 EC-S 00'25" 001 212 OK
B3 03/19 17'33 208S88S854 EC--S 00'21" eel 212 OK
84 03/19 1'7:34 208 895 0390 EC--S 80'22" Ia01 212 OK
05 03/19 17:35 128311J0040 G3--S B0'27" Bel 212 OK
06 03/19 17:36 208 387 6393 EC--S 013'21" 001 212 OK
07 03/19 17:37 FlDA CTY DEVELMT EC--S e0'22" 0el 212 OK
08 03/19 17:38 8885052 EC--S B0'21" 001 212 OK
09 03/19 17:39 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'40" 001 212 OK
10 03/19 17:40 POST OFFICE EC--S 013'31" 001 212 OK
U 03/19 17:41 IDFlHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00'21" 001 212 OK
12 03/19 17:42 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 013'22" 001 212 OK
13 03/19 17:43 2088886701 EC--S B0'20" BBI 212 OK
Red5"C ?os+ for Rt\?\ic.. Notice.. =Tha.n.l{$])
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
_ Shaun Wardle _ Bill Nary
_ Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67.2345(1)(b):
(*20 minutes)
4. Review of ComDuter Surplus Resolution:
(*5 tninutes)
5. Request to provide expanded roll off services to the City of Meridian
by Steve Sedlecek with sse:
(~5 minutes)
6. Discussion on Juvenile Accountability program through the
Prosecution Contract with Boise City:
(*10 minutes)
7. Update I Discussion of EmDlovee Compensati,p(l - Pauline Skeggs
and Stacy Kilchenmann:
~*20 minutes)
* Appro'ximate allowable time set for agenda item may changQ-.depending on
discu$sion. Please use the designated minutes as Oil gui.de:fIDe, only.
Meridian City p",.councij Agenda - M'ItCh 9, 2004 PIl9!> 1 of l'
All mat6llals prescllled at publfc meetings shall becOIM ptOp6rty "r the Cay of MeridIan.
Anyon!> dvr;;rill9 lICcDlIlmodlllfon rCll'dlzablillles NlIaled to documenl$ .mellor h8enngB
please contact 1M city Clorl(o Office af 668-4433 at leesl46 /io1Jr$: prior to the public meeting.
~
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle X Bill Nary
Charlie Rountree )( Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: J>n!-~e~
=E
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: fre J~L-
4. Adoption of the Agenda: arrv< V-.J a~cG
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of January 27, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: t1i-7)?Y"OfI~
B. Approve minutes of February 10, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: O/~t? v<.,.
C. Tabled from March 16,2004: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval: AZ 03-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
5 acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler (Dealv Parcel) by BRS
Architects - southeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle
Road: &'1~ (.Ae-
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 03-
021 Request for reconsideration for annexation and zoning of
114.52 acres from RUT to R-8 (PO) and C-G zones for proposed
Redfeather Estates Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates
Development, LLC - south of East Ustick Road and east of North
Eagle Road: h6-t:R- f-t;? /Jp-n'[ 6; w&4-
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 03-
024 Request for reconsideration for revised Preliminary Plat
approval of 302 building lots and 28 other lots on 90.29 acres in a
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page [ of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
1'-
6.
proposed R-8 (PD) zone for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
-k$6z- ..,<0 h-r;-z 6/ 2vo~
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-041 Request for reconsideration for revised Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development for single-family residential use
with reduced setbacks, lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and
increased block lengths for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
~6t'e h /!pr12 6/ Zpo4r
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law f ro Approval: PP 03-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 11 commercial
building lots 1 common lot on 15.8 acres in a C-G zone for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
~ h> /lpY/-c.. 6/ '2-0(91--
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-066 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a modification to
the existing Conditional Use Permit (Planned Development) for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
~f;.ee. Iv 1l?.JY',,1 61 Pt?v~
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-068 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for professional office
and retail use in a C-G zone as required by the Final Plat for
Mallane Professional Offices by Thomas R. Williams - south of
North Hickory Way and north of East Fairview Avenue:
~.6-eL f,P Ilr/? 6 / 2~t? t/--
J. Development Agreement: AZ 03-015 Request for annexation
and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
Saaeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory
Road: tV;~ rv 11"'<---
K. Development Agreement: AZ 03-018 Request for annexation
and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler I
Cobbs I EaQV I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner and
southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
''j?V/;ee. lv +d 0/ ')...po4-
Department Reports
A. Public Works Department -Gary Srllith ~a..&( tu<fi<-fS",,~
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 2 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
D.
P 62-t>~ '-, 4-ep t. - .Jo I-U'L _ ~Vl!/t~ ~ ~
I ,6rd/rvT 11r'~/~rg-yo., fVr /f1.-.. 1 bV{f tbalttrlrn- tflClr~I't-~j-OI
&t/p j7rO (/lA-'
!J- '- )/.
Request for Latecomers Agreement - Overland Road
Water Line Extension by Bodily RV, Inc.; C>-I:J?'YV~
B. Parks and Recreation Department - Doug Strong
1. Request to transfer funds in the amount of $13,000.00
from Lochsa Falls to Bear Creek Park to complete
sidewalks; /;rn~, bac~ w;f1.-- C:nv/t-eu:.-,f-
C. Planning and Zoning Department -- Anna Powell
1. Discuss letter of support for the City of Star Area of
Impact Amendment; d/TCtts-.{-e,d.-
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) IL-
8. FP 04-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 75 single-family
residential building lots and 11 common lots on 22.16 acres in an R-8
zone for Champion Park Subdivision No.2 by Hillview Development
Corporation - west of North Eagle Road and north of East Ustick Road: o/;;ro~
9. FP 04-016 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 commercial building lots
and 4 common lots on 80.51 acres in a C-G zone for Silverstone
Campus Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - east of South Eagle
Road on the south side of East Overland Road: apln'''Ov.e...
1 o. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: AZ 03-027 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 140.97 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for
proposed Saguaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -
north side of East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
C~Ph~ /J/ IL f.o /1p--r/l- 1'3; PCJo4-
11. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: PP 03-032 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 461 single-family building lots and 43
common lots on 140.25 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
Saguaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of
East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
Cc.-rrvhh-~ .fJ / It. -1-0 /J;Prll /f/ 'Zc;P4-
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: CUP 03-058 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for reduced
requirements for frontages, lot sizes, and minimum house size and
permission to have two cul-de-sac lengths exceed the maximum length in
a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Saauaro Canyon Estates
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of East McMillan Road and
east of North Meridian Road:
&CTY?-- n h tA.<../ )J / It- /l.7 /lpri 2 I ~ 2-0(/4-
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23,2004 Page 3 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please conlnct the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
13. Public Hearing: AZ 03-025 Request for annexation and zoning of 57.84
acres from RUT to C-G zones for Blue Marlin by W. H. Moore Company-
northwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle Road:
a +~ r;te!:f to p-re f fV,.! "c / -f' <I c / ..e ;:'or ~f' /,YP~
14. Public Hearing: AZ 03-037 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 46.40
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by
Centennial Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north
of West Franklin Road: _
./1.(../h-~d.- lJa.c;/"" f.o p, 2- C~ ffr,~
15. Public Hearing: PP 03-046 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 215
residential building lots and 34 common lots on 46.40 acres in a proposed
R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road: _
/le./Yl-~d- btft.Clt- fo fJ f 2- ~ n--iT /1 ~
16. Public Hearing: CUP 03-070 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum
requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio
homes for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road: /\.L~d IJ""ch- t-v ,1)4 2- C~/YV1:;rt~
17. Ordinance No. &4-.- to 72- AZ 03-015 Request for
annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
Saaeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road: ~jifD~
18. Ordinance No. AZ 03-018 Request for
annexation and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for
Kissler I Cobbs I Eaav I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner
and southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
fivUe. to 1Jpr/2 6 I W& 1-
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 4 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiting accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours plior to the public meeting.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23,2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-can Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Bill Nary
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: Presented
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: Presented
4. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of January 27, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: Approve
B. Approve minutes of February 10, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: Approve
c. Tabled from March 16,2004: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval: AZ 03-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
5 acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler (Dealv Parcel) by BRS
Architects - southeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagie
Road: Move to April 6, 2004 Meeting
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: JiZ. 03~
021 Request for reconsideration for annexation and zoning of
114.52 acres from RUT to R-8 (PD) and C-G zones for proposed
Redfeather Estates Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates
Development, LLC - south of East Ustick Road and east of North
Eagle Road: Table to April 6, 2004 Meeting
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 03-
024 Request for reconsideration for revised Preliminary Plat
approval of 302 building lots and 28 other lots on 90.29 acres in a
tI~ridian City COlUlcil Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 1 of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian..
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
piease eom.act the City Cierk's Oitlce at 888-4433 at iea!IT 48 hours prior to the pubHc meeting.
proposed R-8 (PD) zone for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road: Table to April
6,2004 Meeting
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-041 Request for reconsideration for revised Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development for single-family residential use
with reduced setbacks, lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and
increased block lengths for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road: Table to April
6, 2004 Meeting
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law f ro Approval: PP 03-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 11 commercial
building lots 1 common lot on 15.8 acres in a C-G zone for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road: Table to April 6,
2004 Meeting
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-066 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a modification to
the existing Conditional Use Permit (Planned Development) for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road: Table to April 6,
2004 Meeting
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-068 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for professional office
and retail use in a C-G zone as required by the Final Plat for
Mallane Professional Offices by Thomas R. Williams - south of
North Hickory Way and north of East Fairview Avenue: Table to
April 6, 2004 Meeting
J. Development Agreement: AZ 03-015 Request for annexation
and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
SaQeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory
Road: Approve
7 -K. Development Agreement: AZ 03-018 Request for annexation
and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler I
Cobbs I EaQV I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner and
southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
Table to April 6, 2004 Meeting
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 2 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall b"come property of the City of Meridi,m.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at leas148 hours prior to the public meeting.
6. Department Reports
A. Public Works Department - Brad Watson
1. Request for Latecomers Agreement - Overland Road
Water Line Extension by Bodily RV, Inc.: Approve
B. Parks and Recreation Department -- Doug Strong
1. Request to transfer funds in the amount of $13,000.00
from lochsa Falls to Bear Creek Park to complete
sidewalks: Bring back with Contract
C. Planning and Zoning Department -- Anna Powell
1. Discuss letter of support for the City of Star Area of
Impact Amendment: Discussed
D. Police Department - John Overton
1. Grant Application for Anti Drug Coalition Coordinator:
Approve
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
8. FP 04-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 75 single-family
residential building lots and 11 common lots on 22.16 acres in an R-8
zone for Champion Park Subdivision No.2 by Hillview Development
Corporation - west of North Eagle Road and north of East Ustick Road:
Approve
9. FP 04-016 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 commercial building lots
and 4 common lots on 80.51 acres in a C-G zone for Silverstone
Campus Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - east of South Eagle
Road on the south side of East Overland Road: Approve
10. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: AZ 03-027 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 140.97 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for
proposed Saauaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -
north side of East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
Continue Public Hearing to April 13, 2004 Meeting
11. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: PP 03-032 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 461 single-family building lots and 43
common lots on 140.25 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
Meridian City Council Agenda - MardI 23, 2004 Page 3 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Saguaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of
East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road: Continue Public
Hearing to April 13, 2004 Meeting
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: CUP 03-058 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for reduced
requirements for frontages, lot sizes, and minimum house size and
permission to have two cul-de-sac lengths exceed the maximum length in
a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Saguaro Canvon Estates
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of East McMillan Road and
east of North Meridian Road: Continue Public Hearing to April 13, 2004
Meeting
13. Public Hearing: AZ 03-025 Request for annexation and zoning of 57.84
acres from RUT to C-G zones for Blue Marlin by W. H. Moore Company -
northwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle Road: Attorney to
prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for Approval
14. Public Hearing= AZ 03-037 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 46.40
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by
Centennial Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north
of West Franklin Road: Remand back to Planning and Zoning
Commission
15. Public Hearing: PP 03-046 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 215
residential building lots and 34 common lots on 46.40 acres in a proposed
R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road: Remand back to Planning and Zoning Commission
16. Public Hearing: CUP 03-070 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum
requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio
homes for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road: Remand back to Planning and Zoning Commission
17. Ordinance No. 04-1072 : AZ 03-015 Request for annexation
and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Sageland
Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC - northeast corner
of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road: Approve
18. Ordinance No. AZ 03-018 Request for
annexation and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for
Kissler I Cobbs I Eagv I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2GG4 Page 4 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
and southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road: Table
to April 6, 2004 Meeting
Meridian City Council Agenda ~ March 23, 2004 Page 5 of 5
All materials presenwd at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Council MeetinQ
March 23. 2004.
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:28 P.M.,
Tuesday, March 23, 2004, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, William Nary, Keith Bird, Charlie Rountree
and Shaun Wardle.
Others Present: Chris Gabbert, Will Berg, Anna Powell, Brad Watson, Kenny Bowers,
Bill Musser, Doug Strong, Elroy Huff, Diane Stewart and Dean Willis.
Item 1:
Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X
X Bill Nary
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: I will go ahead and call the regular City Council agenda -- meeting to order.
It's Tuesday, March 23rd. Thank you all for joining us here tonight. I will start with roll
call attendance. Mr. Clerk.
Item 2:
Pledge of Allegiance:
De Weerd: Okay. Item NO.2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will, please, rise and
join me in the pledge.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Item 3:
Community Invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
De Weerd: Thank you. Our next item -- we have added a community invocation to our
agenda. We don't wish to offend anyone. Please take this moment, if you don't do it in
prayer, to reflect and have a time to just gather your thoughts. We have Item No. 3 is
our community invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with the Meridian Gospel
Tabernacle. Thank you for joining us.
Roberts: Thank you, Madam Mayor and Council, for the opportunity. Shall we pray.
Again, most gracious and kind Heavenly Father, we do pause to thank you for your
many blessings in our lives daily. We ask this night as we invoke your presence that
you would cause our hearts and our minds to be joined together, that we might be able
to cause the furtherance of the business of this meeting to be done with wisdom and
knowledge and grace. We are so thankful for this wonderful community and the many
blessings that you have brought to us. We ask this night just for your many blessings to
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 2 of 63
continue and cause there to be a true wisdom to prevail in this meeting, in Jesus
precious name we ask, Amen. Good bless you all.
Item 4:
Adoption of the Agenda.
De Weerd: Thank you so much. Okay. Item 4 is the adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Me Bird.
Bird: We have got some changes on the agenda. Items 10, 11, and 12 needs to be
tabled until April 6, 2004.
De Weerd: 13th.
Bird: 13th. No. Thirteen isn't in this, ifs 10, 11, and 12.
Nary: April 13th.
Bird: Oh. April 13th. Oh. Okay. Table that to April 13th. And Item No. 18, the
ordinance -- I understand we don't have the right description of the property; is that
right, Anna?
Powell: We just got a description in at 3:30 this afternoon. We anticipate that it will be
right, so it's fine to go ahead and adopt the findings. We just wanted you to know that
we may have to work with the applicant before you can adopt the ordinance.
Bird: That's what I'm talking about, the 18th -- Item 18, so we need to -- we need to
postpone it --
Powell: One week.
Bird: Well, it will be two weeks, because--
Powell: That's right.
Bird: Until April 6th. Okay. And, then, on the Consent Agenda, items D, E, F, G, Hand
I need to be tabled until 4/6/04 and Item K needs to be moved to 7-K, so it can be
discussed. And, then, we need to add an Item L in the Consent Agenda and that's the
Bodily latecomer's agreement, Overland Road water line extension by Bodily RV,
Incorporated. And with that, Madam Mayor, I would move that we approve the revised
agenda.
Rountree: Second.
(
Meridlan City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 3 of 63
De Weerd: It's been moved and seconded to approve the agenda. We did have a
couple of additions to department reports. One came in a memo form from Brad
Watson on the Overland Road rebuild and the other one is by the police department to
discuss the grants that they are pursuing.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. Bird, on the Consent Agenda items, you said there was -- was it D, E, F, G, H
and I?
Bird: D, E, F, G, H, I.
Nary: Okay. All to the 6th?
Bird: Uh-huh. So, we want to add a police and on the Public Works we had one -- the
Overland Road. Is that right, Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Bird: Okay.
De Weerd: So, the motion maker is okay with that?
Bird: Motion to move to change that, yeah, as stated.
Rountree: Second approves.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. All those in favor please say aye. All ayes. Motion
carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5:
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of January 27, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of February 10, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
c. Tabled from March 16, 2004: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval: AZ 03~022 Request for annexation and zoning of
5 acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler (Dealv Parcell by BRS
Architects - southeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle
Road:
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 4 of 63
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 03-
021 Request for reconsideration for annexation and zoning of
114.52 acres from RUT to R-8 (PD) and C-G zones for proposed
Redfeather Estates Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates
Development, LLC - south of East Ustick Road and east of North
Eagle Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 03-
024 Request for reconsideration for revised Preliminary Plat
approval of 302 building lots and 28 other lots on 90.29 acres in a
proposed R-8 (PO) zone for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-041 Request for reconsideration for revised Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development for single-family residential use
with reduced setbacks, lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and
increased block lengths for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law f ro Approval: PP 03-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 11 commercial
building lots 1 common lot on 15.8 acres in a C-G zone for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-066 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a modification to
the existing Conditional Use Permit (Planned Development) for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-068 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for professional office
and retail use in a C-G zone as required by the Final Plat for
Mallane Professional Offices by Thomas R. Williams - south of
North Hickory Way and north of East Fairview Avenue:
J. Development Agreement: AZ 03-015 Request for annexation
and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
SaQeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory
Road:
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 5 of 63
De Weerd: Okay. Item 5, Consent Agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: As stated before, Items 5-B, 5-E, 5-F, 5-G, 5-H, 5-1 need to be tabled to April 6th,
2004. Item K needs to be taken off the Consent Agenda and moved to Item 7 -K on the
regular agenda and we need to add Item L, which is the latecomer's agreement for
Overland Road water line extension by Bodily RV, Incorporated. And with those
changes, I move we approve the Consent Agenda.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. Will you authorize --
Bird: And the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper papers.
De Weerd: Thank you. II's been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda
as amended. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 6:
Department Reports
A. Public Works Department - Gary Smith
1. Request for Latecomers Agreement - Overland Road
Water Line Extension by Bodily RV, Inc.:
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Okay. Item 6 is Department Reports and we will
start with Public Works. Brad Watson.
Watson: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members. I apologize for getting this on at
the 11 th hour. This just came up late last week and developed into Monday. This
involves the Silverstone Phase 2 project and ACHD's rebuilding or widening of Overland
Road fronting that project. It has come to our attention that there is at least two septic
systems in those houses on the north side of Overland Road. There is an exhibit up on
the projector, if that helps for reference. Two of those septic systems are going to be
dislocated by the road widening. ACHD is asking us what it would take to get them
hooked up to sewer. The mechanics of all that we can take care of. The issue here is
if they are allowed to hook up to sewer, we have said that they need to hook up to water
as well and I'm not sure that they really want to do that. Thirdly, we have said that
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 6 of 63
traditionally or historically we have required them to annex as well if they are contiguous
to the city limits and Bruce Mills is here, maybe he can speak to this a little bit. It
doesn't appear that those residents are real eager to join our city. So, we are just trying
to get a little guidance in fairly short order on what we need to do here. ACHD indicated
to me that they are meeting with their commissioners to discuss this tomorrow morning.
That's why we are here. Do you have any questions?
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Rountree: I have none.
De Weerd: I guess, Brad, I would like to know -- it seems to me like we have had some
flexibility in the past with this and as to annexation, it could be delayed, as well as the
water hook up. Have we had incidences that we have done anything different?
Watson: Madam Mayor, there has been a variety of different circumstances and they
are all a little bit unique. On the South Slough project, those that wanted to connect
were required to annex if they were contiguous. Those that didn't want to connect didn't
have to do anything, but those were the people that wanted services. These people are
being required to hook up by the road-widening project. The one instance that I can
think of that might be somewhat similar was on the Locust Grove Road project where
Marvin Everett, his septic system was in the right of way that was being purchased by
ACHD and we allowed them to connect to sewer and I -- I should have brought that, but
I think it was either a five or ten -- I think it was five year sunset period that he needed to
apply for annexation.
De Weerd: And did he need to hook up to water?
Watson: Maybe Bruce can help me out on that one. I don't believe so.
De Weerd: Okay. Bruce?
Mills: Madam Mayor, Council, unfortunately, I don't know the details on that particular
one. However, this may be an internal thing with ACHD on communication. I was only
aware of one parcel and that, actually, it might not need to be displaced as part of the
project. It's in our right of way a few feet, but because we are shifting the road to the
south -- this is over by Jade, it's behind our sidewalk, so I'm not entirely sure that it's
going to have to get hooked up, but what we were trying to anticipate is what -- what's
going to happen if, in fact, we do wind up hitting one or more of these drain fields during
our project, what options are open to us and that's why we contacted Brad to try to find
this out.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Bruce. Is there anyone else that you wanted to speak to
this or any of the neighbors here that are affected? Okay. Council?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 7 of 63
Rountree: I guess I'm confused as to what the action is. Are we being asked to kind of
establish a pre-policy for the potential of this happening? It's probably not a bad idea.
Or it is actually going to happen and --
De Weerd: I think in several -- in at least one circumstance it sounds like it does affect
this septic.
Watson: Madam Mayor and Council Members, yeah, I didn't, myself, visually review the
plans, somebody else did, and that was the indication I got, that there were two that
would likely be dislocated. The problem with septic systems is no one keeps an
accurate record of exactly where they are, so given Murphy's Law, I don't think I would
want to risk or say that we are not going to hit one. Maybe the direction we need -- or I
need is in the event this happens -- and this all happens very fast out in the field and,
you know, the background of this particular project especially, it's going to happen very
fast. If I had a little bit of guidance on what we would tell those homeowners as far as
annexation and connection to water, that would go a long way in helping me.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I think Brad hit on at least the one I could recall that we have done was the
gentleman who basically wasn't ready to quit farming his property and that was the
rationale that we used and I think we set a five year limit and said we could -- the
Council could always renew it if they wanted to, but I think that we used the same
discussion and rationale was it was -- his drain field was being displaced, it wasn't his --
it wasn't his request, it wasn't anything to do with him, and that was our reasoning to
allow that. We had set some other conditions and no other development, they couldn't
subdivide it -- maybe Mrs. Powell recalls, but we set some other conditions upon that.
Again, no development and other subdivision would be allowed, but that was a farm
ground. I mean that was just -- that's all it was, was just a big blank piece of ground.
These are people's houses, their front yard. I'm not sure what level of redevelopment --
when that's going to occur in this particular location, so that was the driver in the other
one was that at some point it's likely to redevelop in that spot. Here it's a little harder to
gauge, it's a wider roadway, but these are houses. I'm not sure, you know, if that's the
same criteria. I guess that's kind of what Brad's asking is that -- is that reasonable. I
guess I would say what I said in that one, even though I was the only one, it isn't
reasonable. If they have to hook to the sewer, they have to hook to the sewer, that's
life. It's not what everybody wants to do and if we need to figure out a way policy-wise
on how to address that from a cost standpoint, then, we should address it from a cost
standpoint. But hooking to the sewer should be part of annexation into the city and
that's just the way it -- I guess I think it should be, whether they asked for it or not,
because, otherwise, it's going to be incumbent on everyone to remember why does this
apply to this one and not to that one and what happened next door and I think going
forward it is impossible to manage that in the future, so that's what I think.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 8 of 63
De Weerd: Anna, did you have something?
Powell: Madam Mayor and Members of the Council, yeah, just a couple other quick
notes regarding redevelopment of this site. There is a large flood plain associated with
the creek as it runs through here. A lot of this middle ground has flood plain issues with
it. Perhaps not insurmountable, but it -- although they are large properties, they will be
tricky to develop, but I would anticipate, given the huge amount of employment growth
over here that the desirability of these as single family residences may diminish rather --
rather soon here and I would anticipate that we would see some requests for light
offices in these uses to use the existing homes and turn them into offices. Right now
they are shown as low-density development on the Comprehensive Plan. We have
made -- or you have made rulings that, you know, we can kind of bump that commercial
designation that's across the street to catch adjoining properties. Also the Comp Plan
matrix would -- that you will be seeing soon would indicate that it may be appropriate for
these to be light office as well. I just wanted to tell you those things. And the other
thing is, you know, Ada County -- their -- the availability of what you can do in Ada
County is really tied to the availability of sewer and water. So, once they have sewer
and water they could request a rezone from Ada County to commercial designation and
-- or the smaller residential and is that where we want to get ourselves in the position of
being, that we are having to monitor that as well or -- that was all.
De Weerd: Okay. Council?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Having heard those last comments, I think I agree with the comments that
Council President Nary made about trying to track these and trying to do it pieces, parts
at a time, that if we have to get involved with these, we probably ought to look at the full
infrastructure service, as well as having them be included in the city.
De Weerd: Okay.
Rountree: But I'm still confused as to what the action is, other than providing general
direction to the city engineer.
De Weerd: I guess, in essence, you're saying follow the ordinance. If they need to
hook up to sewer, they'll need to hook up to water and apply for annexation. So, that
that's what I heard. Do you need anything further?
Watson: Madam Mayor, no, that's great, just -- I will proceed that way. Thank you.
B. Parks and Recreation Department - Doug Strong
(.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 9 of 63
1. Request to transfer funds in the amount of $13,000.00
from Lochsa Falls to Bear Creek Park to complete
sidewalks:
De Weerd: Okay, thank you, Brad. Okay. Parks and Recreation Department. Doug
Strong.
Strong: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, an update on Bear Creek Park. We
have recently completed the restroom building. As you recall last fall, we were bidding
this project. Ifs now complete and in looking at what else we need to do in the park, we
bring this request forward to you tonight to do some additional work while we are in
there and, actually, have a portion of the park kind of torn up around where the restroom
construction was. So, what you're looking at is a request to move some money from the
Lochsa Falls account that we currently have to Bear Creek to do, essentially, flat work
to connect the restroom to the rest of the park with sidewalks, put in drinking fountain
pads, and to build a pad around where we are building an irrigation pump house. So,
the diagram of what's being proposed is attached, if you have questions about how it1s
all going to connect through the park. There is some concern for ADA accessibility,
certainly to be able to get people in wheel chairs from other parts of the park to the
restroom, so we need sidewalks for that, and, then, also a portion of this proposal is a
service road to get into a maintenance area thafs a part of the restroom building. When
you come in off the street we need to be able to get service vehicles into the building
and into the maintenance room on that building, either with a concrete roadway or an
asphalt roadway into the park. Otherwise, we are driving on grass to get there. So, if
there is specific questions about what -- the detail of what we intend to do there, Park
Superintendent Leroy Huff is here to answer those questions if you have anything
specific.
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions for Doug or Elroy or Diane?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess what I'm a little curious is that for what you're contemplating doing is
beyond -- unless I heard wrong, like the irrigation pump and stuff, it really has nothing to
do with the restroom.
Strong: No. Actually, none of what we are -- there is no connection to the restroom
construction. This would be additional enhancements that we would be asking for, for
the park in next year's budget, unless we do them now, and what 1'm proposing is we do
them now while we have portions of the park already torn up. It's better than coming
back in next year and --
Nary: Tearing it up again.
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 10 of 63
Strong: -- tearing it up again.
Nary: Where was the idea to do this before? I mean I guess what I'm asking why are
we wanting to change this and add this now? When were we going to do it otherwise
and why didn't we think we would do it when we built the building at the same time?
Strong: We had -- part of the problem with doing it when we built the building is that
until we got on the site and knew how we were going to situate the building for sure, we
didn't know how the sidewalks would connect, so we held off on connecting the
sidewalks.
Nary: But we knew we would have to put a sidewalk in.
Strong: Yes.
Nary: I mean wouldn't we? We weren't going to have it in the middle of the grass, so -- I
mean -- so we anticipated sidewalks and the pads and all that stuff, we just didn't know
where they were going to go?
Strong: In the original master plan there is actually quite a lot of concrete work
contemplated for this park up through the center of the ball fields and since thafs not
being proposed anymore in what we are proposing to do with this.
Nary: Okay. Didn't we have money budgeted to do that?
Strong: We had not budgeted money for that yet.
Nary: Oh. Okay. It was just part of the master plan?
Strong: It was part of the master plan. So, part of it was deciding how to -- how we
wanted to connect to the restroom building at some point after the building was in place
and we could get some better idea of how traffic flows would work to and from the
building.
Nary: All right. Thank you.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Doug is this -- is this cost -- is this going out for bid or has it been bid or are we
doing it in-house or what?
Strong: I'll have Elroy address that.
Meridian City Council
March 23. 2004
Page 11 of 63
Huff: Mayor and Council Members, I took some prices on what it would take to do that
and that's what I base that cost off of. Am I speaking loud enough?
Bird: Yeah. And I understand that, Elroy, and I have no -- but what is the plans to do it?
Are we going to let it go out for bid and do it that way or are we going to try to do it in
house?
Huff: No, we won't do it in house.
Bird: Uh?
Huff: We won't do it in house.
Bird: Smart.
Huff: But what I would do is -- I took some prices for that work, which is less than what
was in the original master plan, less actual square footage of concrete, and so we will
now -- because if we do it this way -- and I will probably take a couple of more prices to
make sure that I'm well rounded in my quotes.
Bird: The thing that I -- without having a firm bid and stuff, are you sure that 13,000 is
going to be enough?
Huff: The one that I have -- the one I based that on is a firm one.
Bird: Is a firm quote?
Huff: That one is a firm one.
De Weerd: So, you have already done some estimates to --
Huff: Oh, yeah.
De Weerd: -- know what the costs would be.
Huff: Yeah.
De Weerd: Okay.
Huff: That's what that one is based on.
Bird: Okay. That's alii have.
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions, Council?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
(
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 12 of 63
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: So, what, are you going to bring back a contract with some -- I mean you did
informal bids, then?
Huff: Yes. Quotes.
Nary: Okay. And so you're going to bring back a contract -- we are not going to
approve 13,000 dollars today, you're going to bring back a contract that's going to have
an amount in it and some work attached to it, so we are not going to come back later
and say we need 5,000 dollars more. So, we are not approving money today, we are
just approving the concept of doing this for about 13,000 bucks.
Huff: That's what it would cost to do it, yeah.
Nary: Okay. And we are going to get a contract and we are going to have -- and we
are going to see that before we approve this expenditure?
Huff: That will be fine.
Nary: That wasn't what you were going to do, but thaes what you're going to do now.
Huff: No, ies -- always have to let a contract and --
Nary: Okay.
Huff: -- if ies over a certain amount, you will have to see it or have to have some
approval on that, so --
Nary: Okay. Great.
De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Madam Mayor, when Doug and I discussed this project, I asked those
questions and the response I got was this is part of the master plan, was not included in
the work for the restroom, it was not budgeted for last year, however, this presents an
opportunity to do this work at a reduced scope of what the master plan entails as far as
concrete and what I'm hearing Council say is we agree with it in concept, but we need
confirmed numbers and, then, we will transfer, essentially, that exact amount. Is that
what I'm hearing?
De Weerd: I think what is -- the discussion is, is it's okay to move forward, to go and get
the bids and, then, bring it back. Is that correct? And, then, the money will be
authorized to transfer.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 13 of 63
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: That's the way I understand it. I hope I'm understanding right. But what they want
is to be able to take whatever it is, whether it's 12,900 or 13,000 and move it from
Lochsa to Bear Creek within the budget and -- that's the way I understand it, so I don't
know what we would be passing on now.
De Weerd: And it can be authorized at the same time that the contract is approved.
Bird: Yeah.
c. Planning and Zoning Department -- Anna Powell
1. Discuss letter of support for the City of Star Area of
Impact Amendment:
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Our next item -- is there anything further? Okay. Thank you.
The next item is Item C, Planning and Zoning Department. Anna Powell.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I just have a very brief -- really, an
introduction to a topic today. I had met with the zoning administrator for the City of Star,
who is here tonight, Craig Eckles. For those of you who don't know him, maybe he will
wave his hand. There he is. The city of Star is in the process of negotiating a new area
of city impact with Ada County and we met briefly and he kind of discussed what
thoughts the city had regarding where they wanted to go. They do want to go up to
Chinden. We would share the area from Black Cat to McDermott across Chinden Road,
so -- and he had asked me if the Council would be willing to do a letter of support, so I
said I would ask you and that's all I'm doing tonight. We don't have a lot of information.
Since that time I believe you all got individual e-mails from Nicole Baird Spencer with
the City of Eagle. The City of Eagle is also trying to negotiate a new area of city impact
with Ada County and Ada County -- I think in a nutshell they said you go talk to Star,
you guys work something out and, then, you come back to us together and that's where
it stands right now. So, they have requested that we not do a letter of support, that we
just stay neutral at this time. And that's the information I have. I believe the Mayor has
additional information.
De Weerd: Not of any importance.
Powell: Okay.
De Weerd: And Craig is certainly here to answer any questions if Council has any. The
planning director is suggesting -- and I think Star is okay if we just stay neutral. If we do
have questions as it progresses, that they are willing to come and do a presentation to
answer any questions that might come up. I do think it is important that we decide at
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 14 of 63
some point and have some conversations -- I think there is some concern with our fire
district and Mr. Eckles and I had talked about that prior to the meeting. So, we just
need to do a little bit more exploratory ourselves to see if there will be an impact on our
services and answer some of those questions that have come up as well and I think that
dialogue can certainly happen. Is there any questions? Okay. Thank you, Anna.
D. Police Department - Captain Overton:
De Weerd: We did add a fourth report from our police department and I believe that
Captain Overton is here to speak on the grant that is in front of you.
Overton: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you for allowing us to come in
at the last minute on this. You have before you a grant application form. It's an Edwin
Burr Memorial Grant. It is for a Meridian Police Department anti-drug coalition
coordinator as part of the Mayor's anti-drug coalition. On the front you will see that the
cost to the city for the one-year grant would be 14,000 dollars in a 25 percent match.
The grant -- we are asking for 40,405 dollars, for a total cost of 54,405 dollars total
package in the grant. This total cost does include wages, all benefits, and office
equipment and various expenses that this person would need for a full year of work. If
there is any questions, I'd entertain them at this time.
De Weerd: Captain, what additional duties would this position assume?
Overton: The main thrust of this coordinator is going to be, first off, being our sole
coordinator for the city on all programs that are being run by various organization within
the city now or within the Treasure Valley that we don't have in the city at this time. This
person would be able to bring all those programs to one central point and begin to
develop trainers and instructors scheduling for our various businesses and
neighborhood groups and allow us to coordinate our efforts with our youth and our
residences and our families on this drug education and prevention. Furthermore, this
person will also become an instructor that we can send out and schedule out to put on
this training in various places in the city.
De Weerd: Council, I know that the drug free community has come along with the
change in leadership and this opportunity did present itself. I appreciate the advocacy
of the police department in trying to be a very active and pro-active -- or a pro-active
part in this effort on saying, no, drugs are not welcome in Meridian and we have had
great response at the drug coalition meetings. There have been well over 40 or 50
people at those meetings, close to 60 on the first one. There seems to be a lot of
interest. We have DEQ and the U.S. Attorneys Office that are offering support and
training as well, so there is a great deal of interest and this is something that will be very
important as being a safe and healthy community. So, I hope for your consideration of
this.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 15 of 63
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would -- if we need a motion or anything, I would be more in favor of -- for 14,000
of getting this kind of a grant. It's only going to cost us 14. It's very, very important, I
believe. Anything that we can do to be pro-active with drugs and stuff I think is -- helps
the community -- the whole community. And so I would -- I'm sure we can find 14,000
dollars somewhere that we can use.
Overton: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is strictly a request tonight for the
application for the grant process and for the Mayor's signature to send it in. We are
facing a deadline of the 26th, which is Friday of this week to get this turned in.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: And forgive me, captain, because I'm sure it's in here and I just haven't had time
to read through all of this. This is a non-sworn position, I assume.
Overton: Correct. This is a civilian position.
Nary: A civilian position. And it looks like the grant is just for one year, so to retain that
position we either need to renew this grant -- is this a renewable grant?
Overton: The Edward Burr Memorial Grant, which is an anti-drug from 1988 grant
system does not state year to year how many funds are available. We could apply for it
year after year, but this is specifically a 12-month grant in front of you.
Nary: So, it's potentially possible that we have to continue funding it at the 54,000
dollar mark or discontinue the position after one year --
Overton: That's correct. We would have to do one of the two.
Nary: And I did note in here, just so I'm clear, that this position wouldn't actually start
until the beginning of the fiscal year, so the 14,000 doesn't have to come out of a
current project, it could be put into the budget request from the police department to
fund, if we are awarded the grant.
Overton: That's correct. This will be a budget enhancement we add into our budget
request for fiscal year 2005.
Nary: Okay. Great. Thank you.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary, I guess to add to that, is once this program is established and has
been in process for approximately six months, it is eligible for other types of granting
opportunities, so I think we will be able to really evaluate the effect of this other program
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 16 of 63
and see if certainly it is something that is worth re-investing in and there will be a lot of
different types of grants that we can pursue as well. So, it just gets the program a
coordinator and it gets it off the ground to see how effective we can be in pursuing this
approach with very little investment by the city. Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Madam Mayor -- and I also agree that this is a -- it's an important step for us to
-- I'm not going to say begin addressing this important problem, because we are
addressing it now with the department. I think it's a good instrument for us to further our
developments within the community in relation to drug abuse and those sorts of
problems.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: And I don't have any disagreement with any of that. Like I said, my more concern
was what was our level of commitment. Obviously, we do have to make an assessment
year to year on whether or not to keep that position. A grant position doesn't concern
me in that regard. If we didn't find it to be effective, we could, obviously, discontinue
that. But I wanted to make sure we weren't binding ourselves to continuing it as some
grants are where they diminish the amount, but we can't extinguish the program.
De Weerd: Right. Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Madam Mayor, I'm not going to speak to the good of this, because I think this
is a good program, but we do get drug down into the minutia and the budget details
always on these things. I don't know that that question that you just brought up,
Councilman Nary, was answered to me. Are there federal strings attached to this grant
that would imply that we have to -- once getting the grant and establishing a
coordinator, have a prescribed period of time that we would have to maintain the
coordinator?
Overton: I haven't read that language in any of the grant application paperwork with this
grant. It was strictly a 12-month grant, unlike some of the cops grants, we have to make
a long-term commitment.
Rountree: The other question I have is we have talked about -- it is a grant, it is
potentially renewable, depending on the funds available. The document talks about a
project evaluation, but it leads me to believe that this is not just a one time, one-year
program. If it doesn't appear to be working, because it indicates it's going to take
several years to correctly monitor the success and it makes that statement in several
places in the project evaluation. So, my understanding when we enter into this, if we
enter into this, that it's probably going to be a Multiple year project, so I just want that on
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 17 of 63
the record now, instead of in October when we talk about it and that potential becomes
an issue.
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree, I guess that is true, although the coalition is up and going
right now, so at the end of the term of this -- or this grant, it will have almost completed
a two year period and you will have certain measurements in place. So, that could
possibly fulfill that, but it does award further -- or exploration, so if we proceed forward,
those questions can be asked and when that enhancement is requested for, it can be
answered at that time.
Rountree: That's correct.
De weerd: So, I guess what we need is a motion to authorize myself to sign this, so we
can apply for the grant.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the application for the grant for the Mayor to sign
and the Clerk to attest.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve the application of the
grant and for the mayor to sign. I don't think we need a roll call. All those in favor say
aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Thank you, Captain Overton, for finding this and pursuing it.
Overton: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you.
Item 7:
(Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
K. Development Agreement: AZ 03-018 Request for annexation
and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler I
Cobbs I Eaav I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner and
southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
De Weerd: Thank you, chief. Okay. Items removed from the Consent Agenda was
item K. I'll ask for comments from Anna.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I actually had squeezed in this whole
conversation on Item No. 18. It's just that we just got new legal descriptions this
r ..
'.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 18 of 63
afternoon and just need a chance to review them. We feel comfortable with you
adopting the findings and we will just -- we are pretty sure it's the right legal description,
we just haven't had a chance to look at it yet. That's all.
De Weerd: Would it just -- is there any real burning issue here that we can't just table it
to the 4th of April -- or the 6th of April? I'm sorry.
Powell: No. That's fine also, because when the ordinance will get adopted, you have
already moved that to that date so that's fine.
De Weerd: Okay. Well, I think it would help take the guesswork out of it.
Powell: Yes.
De Weerd: Or, Council, what is your pleasure?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we table Item No. 7-K, AZ 03-018, annexation for Kissler, Cobbs,
Eagy and Ruwe, to April 6th.
Nary: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to table Item 7-K to April 6th. All
those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 8:
FP 04-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 75 single-family
residential building lots and 11 common lots on 22.16 acres in an R-8
zone for Champion Park Subdivision No.2 by Hillview Development
Corporation - west of North Eagle Road and north of East Ustick Road:
De Weerd: Okay. Number 8 is FP 04-015, Champion Park Subdivision NO.2. We will
start with staff comments.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is the preliminary plat for
Champion Park Subdivision. The area circled in red is the subject area of the final plat.
The final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. We have
a letter from Engineering Solutions, dated March 19th, saying that they are in
agreement with the conditions of approval, so this is ready for your -- it's a very clean
plat and stpff is recommending approval.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 19 of 63
De Weerd: Okay. Since we got a letter from the applicant, there is no need for the
applicant to say anything, unless they would like to. Okay. Any questions or -- I would
entertain a motion.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move we approve FP 04-015, final plat for Champion Park Subdivision NO.2.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve FP 04-015. Any further
Discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRI ED: ALL AYES.
Item 9:
FP 04-016 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 commercial building lots
and 4 common lots on 80.51 acres in a C-G zone for Silverstone
Campus Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - east of South Eagle
Road on the south side of East Overland Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 9 is FP 04-016 for Silverstone Campus Subdivision. Start
with staff comments.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is the approved preliminary plat
for the Silverstone Campus Subdivision. It was approved -- the conceptual plan was
approved with three different layouts, but this was the preliminary plat. As you know
staff and the Mayor spent quite a bit of time deciding on an appropriate final plat
configuration -- was determined that this would be in substantial compliance. The road
-- this road drops to the south, as you can see, where it would border -- or share a
border with Sutherland Farms. The need for this half street goes away, because this
road is dropping to the southern boundary. These streets -- this street primarily stays
there. We had a new cross street. The upper portion remains primarily the same.
There is a connection to the other Silverstone Corporate Center and, then, this one 1's
in. The main road 1's in. Brad Hawkins-Clark has provided a fairly detailed comparison
of the approved preliminary plat to the final plat. It does represent fewer building lots.
There is an issue of a little less open space and the applicant is -- has been asked to tell
the Council what their second amenity will be for the planned development at tonight's
hearing. I think they are proposing a picnic shelter and you will need to review that to
decide whether it's an acceptable second amenity before approving the final plat. This
plat isn't as clean as we usually see them, so the engineering staff has added a kind of
generic condition of approval and that's item number 21 and it just says that there are
numerous drafting issues on the final plat map as submitted. The Public Works
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 20 of 63
Department will transmit a red line mark up of the issues to Pinnacle Engineers for
correction. These issues will be satisfied prior to signature on the final plat by the city
engineer. It gives staff the opportunity to still work with the applicant to clean up the
plat, but to move it forward at this time. And Brad also has a revision that he has
requested to speak to.
Watson: Madam Mayor, Council Members, just one very minor one on site specific
number 11, the second sentence, applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer
and water mains to and through this proposed development and in parenthesis it says
including Copperpoint Way and McMillan Road. The reference to Copperpoint Way
should reference water only and not sewer and thafs all I have.
De Weerd: Any questions for staff? Okay. Is the applicant's representative here?
Please state your name and address.
McKinnon: Dave McKinnon, 735 South Crosstimber.
De Weerd: Thank you.
McKinnon: I'm here tonight representing Sundance Corporation for the plat that we
have been talking about. First of all, I'd just like to thank Council and staff for working
with us. I know it's been a process for everybody and give my gratitude to you and from
the applicant and the owner of the project as well. I have had a chance to read through
the staff report and we agree with the staff report. We will make the changes as
requested by staff. I have had a chance to talk with Bruce Freckleton and received the
red line corrections that Anna was talking about just at the very end, that it's not the
cleanest plat. I've had a chance to receive those and review those. We will make those
red line corrections as requested. One other addition before I get to the open space is
that in talking with Brad Hawkins-Clark about this process and, then, there was a memo
sent to Anna -- I don't know if it was passed along -- to Anna and I don't know if it was
passed along to you. It was a requirement for us to meet with and work with the
commuter ride people to provide a bus stop or other sort of alternate transportation and
we have had a chance to talk with them and I have had a short conversation with them
and we have been talking about putting that area in conjunction with the open space
that we are providing, the open picnic area, sheltered area. That area is just off the
pathway. It's this area that I'm highlighting right now. It's this small triangular-shaped
piece. It's right off the pathway. As you know, the pathway follows the Eight Mile as it
runs through and, then, right off that end would be the picnic area and shelter area. In
talking with commuter ride they said that they felt that would be the most appropriate
place for a bus stop, because it's a central location, it's off of the walking path, and it
already has a picnic shelter shown on the landscape plan for that. So, we have shown
that to be a nice seating area and that would be appropriate for the office types of uses
and the other commercial uses in the area. Other than that, if you have any questions
I'd welcome your questions at this time, but we have read the staff report and agree with
it.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 21 of 63
De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. McKinnon, did you have discussions with the southern property -- Sutherland
Farms about the movement of the road? Did they have any objection or concern about
that?
McKinnon: You should have received I think three letters, actually, from Sutherland
Farms and there was an agreement to work with Sundance from Sutherland, to work
with them on that, and so there is an agreement. In fact, the first letter you received
states that there is an agreement in place for them to work together on the completion
of that road.
Nary: And I guess -- and maybe this is in there, too. The adjacent property owner to
the east, was there any contact with him at all?
McKinnon: You should have received a copy of a letter that we sent to Mr. Benafield.
Nary: Is it in here somewhere? There is none in here.
McKinnon: Okay. Well, we had a chance -- I state in the -- stating what the issues were
and he called me back and said I have no issues, other than he wanted me to quit
referring to the ditch as the Eight Mile. He believes that's not the Eight Mile, but he had
no other objections other than that.
De Weerd: Well, if that's all you were dealing with, you were doing well. Any other
questions, Council?
Nary: No. It's probably in here somewhere.
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Thank you.
McKinnon: Thanks again.
De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we approve FP 04-016, final plat for Silverstone Campus
Subdivision, to incorporate all staff and applicant comments.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve FP 04-016. Is there any
further discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Clerk.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 22 of 63
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 10:
Item 11:
Item 12:
Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: AZ 03-027 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 140.97 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for
proposed Saauaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -
north side of East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: PP 03-032 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 461 single-family building lots and 43
common lots on 140.25 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
Saauaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of
East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: CUP 03-058 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for reduced
requirements for frontages, lot sizes, and minimum house size and
permission to have two cul-de-sac lengths exceed the maximum length in
a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Saauaro Canyon Estates
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of East McMillan Road and
east of North Meridian Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Items 10,11 and 12 have been requested to be table to April
13th, 2004. Is there anyone in the audience who came for this particular agenda item?
Okay. Council, I would entertain a motion to continue these three items.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I move that we continue Items 10, 11 and 12, public hearings AZ 03-027, PP
03-032, and CUP 03-058 until our next regularly scheduled meeting -- oh, until the 13th
of April.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Thank you. It's been moved and seconded to table items 10, 11 and 12 to
April 13th, 2004. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Item 13 is a Public Hearing -- we are required by ordinance for those who
testify to be sworn in and so we do it all at the beginning of the Public Hearing section.
So, those that are willing -- or willing to testify or wanting to testify, if you will, please,
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 23 of 63
raise your right hand. This is for all the public hearings. Thank you. Do you testify that
the testimony you provide tonight is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,
so help you God? If so, answer I do.
(Affirmative answers.)
Item 13:
Public Hearing: AZ 03-025 Request for annexation and zoning of 57.84
acres from RUT to C-G zones for Blue Marlin by W. H. Moore Company
- northwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle Road:
De Weerd: Thank you very much. I will go ahead and open Item 13 for AZ 03-025 for
Blue Marlin and we will start with staff comments.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for annexation and
zoning without a development plan, so all you have before you tonight is the re-zone
request and annexation. They are requesting zoning -- the C-G zoning. The
Comprehensive Plan does show this as mixed use regional, similar to Kissler, Eagy,
Ruwe and, then, Kissler, Dealy, and, then, Redfeather was the other property, the 21
acre Redfeather property just south of Kissler. At the Planning -- and similar to those
applications, staff went into the Planning and Zoning Commission with similar
requirements to have a development agreement that listed the Comprehensive Plan
policies associated with the mixed use regional. At the Public Hearing there were quite
a few people testify and Brad Hawkins-Clark has detailed those in his cover memo to
you. The key change that the Commission did was to delete staff's recommendation on
condition three, which was all Comprehensive Plan policies associated with the mixed
use regional and to replace it with revised language, which, as I said, removes a
requirement to incorporate residential in any future development. They maintain the
requirement for future CUP applications and a condition that future plans include a
continuous public or private road system that extends to the north. The outstanding
issues are, one, the -- deleting the policies associated with the mixed use regional and
that's what's shown on the second page of Brad's summary cover memo and he lists all
the policies that were deleted and staff is -- continues to recommend that those be
included. The second issue was the future development process. Commissioner
Zaremba's motion was somewhat unclear with regard to how future development should
proceed. The exact wording was it was either a conditional use planned development
or subdivision application prior to future development. Generally, you have approved
develop agreements with detailed conceptual use approval, so right now we don't have
any concept plan. If they did a subdivision that would vest them with building rights the
way that the -- it was worded right now. So, currently there is not a mechanism to
review the development that goes on if it were a principal permitted use in the zone.
The third issue is a letter from ITD and that letter regarded the -- the type four access,
which would be only at intersections and at the mile. So, basically, ITD is saying that
this property will likely not have access to Eagle Road. They talk about trying to
maintain some efficiencies on Eagle Road at this point. There is a subsequent follow-
up memo from Sue Sullivan addressed to Brad that also states that they won't be
having an access to Eagle Road and that there should be some sort of back-age road
\
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 24 of 63
or frontage road through the property that connects to the north. And, then, again, we
had a little bit of -- not exactly clear on the motion from Commissioner Zaremba. The
Commissioner said that the private or public road could or could not extend to the
northern property. Staff feels it's important to get to the northern property in order to get
out to the half mile where there is -- you can see the collector street -- this is in the city
of Boise, but if there were to be another light on Eagle Road, it would be at this mid mile
location and could connect down through as these properties redevelop. So, that right
now there is a private lane that's at the northern border, so you could not connect a
public road to the private lane. So, the actual physical connection couldn't occur until
there was another public road up here, but you could at least provide that opportunity
and plan for it and that's one of the issues. That's the final issue, actually. So -- and,
then, I can give you specifics on what needs to be changed, depending on which of
these you mayor may not want to do, these changes to the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommendation. They have recommended approval and with that I'll end
staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Council, any questions for staff at this time? Okay. We will ask the
applicant to come forward. He has up to 15 minutes to present the project. Public
testimony from the citizens are three minutes testimony and, then, the applicant has a
chance for rebuttal. Okay. If you will state your name and address.
Seal: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. Jonathan Seal, 600 North
Steelhead, Boise, Idaho. I'm here on behalf of W.H. Moore Company. First, before I
get into, I guess, the meat of what Anna has talked about, I'd like to just take a couple
minutes and explain why we are here tonight as far as just simply an annexation
rezone. I understand that's a little bit different than what you typically see, although
maybe that's changing. What we have found is when we have had large users contact
us on this particular parcel of land, one of the first questions they ask is is it zoned for
this use. If the answer is yes, the conversation continues. If the answer is no, it ends
right there. There is a great deal of properties out there and too little time for these
people to risk the potential that it may not be zoned for that, even though we can state
to them we will promise you can get it, we know we can, it ends right there. And I think
as a real example is if you look at the City Group, now we can talk about it. We did
meet with them back in November and one of the first questions that came out of their
mouth was is your land zoned for our use, which at that point all we knew was a call
center and, of course, our answer was yes. We had elected not to, for a variety of
reasons, but that was one of the key things and I think the reality is had you not had the
land here within the City of Meridian that was zoned for that use of that size, you
potentially would have looked at maybe the City Group either being in another city
within the Treasure Valley or potentially within another state. We have also
encountered the same thing in ours, when we have had -- in fact, we are talking to a
large user right now only because we are moving through this process and it looks like
we are about there, who I think would be an excellent use for this project. So, I just
explain that, I think, to just give you an idea of why we are coming here only for what is
maybe part of the process. With respect to the Planning and Zoning recommendations,
what I'd like to do -- which is the actual document that was approved last time, what I'd
Meridian City Council
March 23. 2004
Page 25 of 63
like to do is I think we can simplify this. I'd like to go to page two and make some
suggestions here and, then, ask you to be -- that this be approved with these
suggestions. First off, item -- on page two, item 3-A, which starts with priority
annexation, as Anna said -- and that's correct, if you read this it says that we could
submit for a subdivision. Or intention has never been just to do a subdivision. We have
said since the beginning that we will come in here with a planned use development or
conditional uses at the time that we do development, so that we give the city the
opportunity to evaluate and approve what is reasonable for this area. So, with that,
what we would suggest is the word subdivision simply be struck. So, it would,
essentially, read that the DA will require either a conditional use or a planned
development application be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to future
development and I believe that that would address the concern of staff on that issue.
On 3-8 -- and I think this is just a typo -- after application it says for a site specific -- it
should be application or a site specific. If you look at my letter that is in your packet that
I submitted prior to the P&Z hearing it does use the word or, so I think that's just a
simply typo. So, again, it would just read: Development application or a site-specific
plan with any conditional use. And, then, finally, we -- as Anna talked about, we have
talked a little bit about the road system and the access system. I think Mr. Moore is
going to speak, too, but I'll try to maybe articulate a little bit of his thinking. I think his
concern here is that what he's going to end up here with is a project that's basically
going to have thoroughfare going through it. When I first talked to P&Z, my position at
that point was why we don't remove this condition. There was a condition in the initial
thing as a parallel road to Eagle, that this can be addressed in either the planned use
development or the conditional use application and we know what it is. We certainly
acknowledge the fact that there is going to be some type of access system through this
project, but we don't know what that looks like and it seems like that should be
something that should be discussed at the time we come back for either the planned
use development or the conditional use application. At that point, then, you can
evaluate and determine what it should look like, where it should go, what should be the
access point and how it should be handled. So, we really question whether or not we
really need to have this at this point and I think as we read this language in here, then,
we read what staffs recommendations are, it gives us a lot of -- I'll say trepidation about
where this could end up and, as I say, it could be -- I think in Mr. Moorets mind it could
be potentially an 1-84 going through this project. I know that's a little bit of an
exaggeration, but, again, I think we are just simply saying, you know, we will address it
at the appropriate time, but we don't think this is it. I think all we are simply asking for
today here -- and I think as this is, is enable us to annex and rezone this, bring it into the
City of Meridian, allow us to market it and allow us to be able to attract the type of
commercial users I think the city wants and that's simply it and we will be coming back
at a later date and we will have details, then, and we will address the issues that will
determine how this project is going to look. So, I think with that I will answer any
questions you might have.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 26 of 63
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. Seal, maybe you could expand a little bit, though. I guess I'm still a little
unclear in reading the minutes and looking at the documents that we have, as to their --
your concerns about those mixed use policies and I think the staff has stated, you know,
we just recently passed, you know, you know, adjacent properties with those types of
policies to do that and had conditional use requirements on them and all. So, I guess
I'm, I guess, a little unclear as to what concerns you have about those policies being a
part of the development agreement.
Seal: Madam Mayor, Council Members, I guess in kind of a summary form, one, I look
at the Comprehensive Plan as a stand-alone document. The fact that these conditions
are put in here or not put in here does not foreclose you from utilizing those conditions.
The Comp Plan by itself stands by itself. I don't see where we want to, I guess,
complicate a development agreement by putting in certain items within the
Comprehensive Plan that already exist and there is -- we are not discussing -- there is
no dispute about those. The other thing is, in my past experience sometimes, is you put
these in and later down the road someone comes back and looks at it and instead of it
being a vague thing or a recommendation, it's determined as something cast in concrete
and, then, we are back here arguing with you saying, well, no, wait a minute, that was
really not the intent of it. So, I guess I'd almost say to you where is the benefit -- where
the purpose of putting it in when you already have that Comprehensive Plan standing
there. We are not changing it today and I think all it is, is it's making the development
agreement more complicated than it needs to be. All we are simply trying to do is
create an annexation and rezone, we are agreeing to a Conditional Use Permit or
planned use development and we will come back to you later and I don't think that that's
any different than any others. So, I guess I'm a little -- I guess I'm a little confused on
the need for it or the purpose for it.
Nary: May I follow up, Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Nary: I guess, Mr. Seal, what your argument is, is that we don't need it, because it's
already concrete, but if we put it in there, it might be concrete and I don't -- I guess I still
don't see why this would be any different. You know, the issue for me isn't this
development or yourself or Mr. Moore in developing this property, the issue is, is if for
some reason Mr. Moore decides not to develop this property and sell it, that
development agreement will go with it and without it -- without at least making that clear
with folks, how important we think that is because of this corridor and because of what's
so significant, I don't see how it hurts you, since if it already exists, it's already there.
So, it's not going to hurt to have it as part of that is what the staff was seeking.
Seal: Well, Madam Mayor, Council Members, I guess on the flip side of it, I don't see
where it benefits us either. And, again, that Comprehensive Plan, whether Mr. Moore
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 27 of 63
sells this and the development agreement runs with the land, that Comprehensive Plan
will always be there. To me it's a separate document. Again, I think my main concern is
it has potential to muddy the waters, to maybe create confusion down the road, and I
just question the need for it when we want to try to keep the development agreement as
simple as possible in the process, get to the meat of the subject and address that only.
I don't think you're giving up anything by not having it in there. You know, we are not
trying to change the Comprehensive Plan, we are simply trying to address the issues
that we think are pertinent to this and I think these are the items that we have
discussion here, so --
De Weerd: Any further questions? Thank you, Mr. Seal.
Seal: Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Mr. Moore, if you will, please state your name and address.
Moore: Winston Moore, 11665 Thomas Drive in Boise. Mayor De Weerd and
Councilmen. Jonathan and I -- he's going to shoot me, but I don't -- we didn't ask that
those conditions from the Comprehensive Plan be removed. We didn't object to them.
In fact, staffs report says that very thing, that Mr. Seal did not object to the conditions,
Commissioner -- or, Councilman Nary, that you just alluded to. The P&Z did this on
their own. And so I think there is -- I would say -- and I think, again, Jonathan is going
to wish he was working for someone else, but we don't have any problem with that. I
mean they -- those are fine. The one item that I would like to speak to -- and I think I
perhaps owe an apology to staff, because 1'm kind of -- we are springing this on them at
the last minute. Not intentionally, but I just -- it just dawned on me the other day that
even two years ago when we spoke with some of you very people about this potential
project, we were talking about a frontage road. A couple of you mentioned, you know,
Eagle Road, as busy as it is, that we would have limited access to Eagle and a frontage
road would make a lot of sense and I did not disagree and as it's evolved there should
be a frontage road, which in the documents here has been changed to back-age road
and, you know, it's one and the same, except they are in different spots, and I have
never had any problem with that, but there has been some creep -- and I don't mean
that in a sarcastic way, but it just kind of snuck up on us and we have gone from
frontage road -- or from -- yeah, frontage road to back-age road, now to a full roadway
system through the middle of this project and that isn't going to work. I mean this is a
private project, a frontage road -- certainly all of you have been to the Crossroads
development and on the west side you may recall that in front of the main building
where the shops are, Cold Stone, Creamery, or whatever it is. There is a back-age
road that runs right along in front of those shops and, then, to the west -- there is a
parking lot to the west and to the west of that there is another -- that would be a
frontage road, I guess, running in front of the pads. There is no public streets going
through there. And so my position is, respectfully, that I don't want this project bisected
by a public road for any reason and there is no need for it. I fully acknowledge the need
to minimize the access points on Eagle Road, but that should be done by the concept
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 28 of 63
that we have been working with all along, which was first a frontage road and, then, a
back-age road.
De Weerd: So, Mr. Moore, what you're saying is you will connect to the north, but your
not -- you're not supportive of a public road per se. You would move the circulation
such as you see at the family center.
Moore: Mayor de Weerd, I don't want -- 1'm saying that as far as connecting to the
north, I don't understand the -- if this is -- if this back-age-frontage road is to serve this
project, which clearly it is, I don't think there is any need for it to connect to the private
lane to the north of our property. And, frankly, and beside the point, I guess, if you were
those neighbors and felt that there was going to be a through road running right through
the beautiful property up there, you know, I would think they would all be in here. But it
certainly -- the frontage road, back-age road, whatever it needs to get out of the project,
and, notwithstanding, the note from the lady at Idaho Transportation Department -- and
we have talked to them and that perhaps should concern me, but that is a policy and not
an ordinance. She does say our current access control policy would not allow access to
Eagle Road from this property. A temporary or permanent access would require a
variance to the policy. This is policy, ies not ordinance, and we have discussed it with
them and, obviously, in fairness, she does say it's likely that a variance would be
recommended, because the site has alternate access to Ustick Road. It's hard for me
to conceive a project with that much frontage on Eagle Road -- there must be 1,700
yards or something there, not having an access. We have three accesses there now.
There are three individual parcels and three accesses. Now how that will shake out I
don't know, but ies my thought that the frontage-back-age road, whichever it is, it is, will
allow traffic on Eagle Road to enter our project and exit the project, obviously, without
an access point every couple hundred yards or something. There probably will be one
at the north and one at the south, I would guess, access points, but that road should be
used only to alleviate the traffic situation on Eagle Road an allow people to get into the
project and out without multiple accesses up there. And I will sit down now, but, again,
the thought of having -- whether it's public or private, through road going through this
project -- and, respectfully, it just doesn't make any sense as far as this project goes
and that's what we are discussing.
De Weerd: Any questions for Mr. Moore? Thank you.
Moore: Thank you very much.
De Weerd: I have one person signed up to testify. Is Mr. Davis here? If you would just
state your name and address.
Davis: My name is Tom Davis and I live at 2740 East Ustick Road, Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 29 of 63
Davis: Madam Mayor and Council Members, I'd like to read this -- I sent in a letter, but
I'd like to read it for the record. It says: I represent the Layton Lateral. We respectfully
request that you require all ditches to be in concrete tile along the lateral. More
specifically, we request the requirement for concrete tile for the Layton Lateral and all
other ditches in the Jasmine Acres and running through W.H. Moore property. The
Layton Lateral is piped in 30 inch concrete from the Settler's Canal at Cloverdale Road
and west along Ustick Road until one-fourth mile from Eagle Road. Further, the lateral
is tiled in concrete north from Ustick along Eagle for 350 feet. From this point it is open
ditch west across Mr. Moore's property to the Davis property. This distance is
approximately 1,320 feet and should be tiled in concrete, not plastic or metal. The
patrons of the Layton Lateral have a responsibility to maintain and protect the lateral
from the Settler's Canal to delivery points on their property. Settler's Irrigation only
delivers the water to the point where the Layton Lateral leaves the canal. We are
requesting concrete tile to prevent any future damage, which could be possible with
plastic and metal pipe. The Layton Lateral supplies water to Champion Park
subdivision, Summerfield Subdivision, the Davis property, the Hollister property, the
school properties, including two charter schools, one elementary school, and Jasmine
Acres, property owners Jack Laninsky, Ed Bollinger, Norman Cook, and Wally Hedrick.
We respectfully request that you require all ditches to be in concrete tile. The only other
thing I'd like to say is that on my property there, which is Champion Park Subdivision,
that where this -- where this line is right here is all I wanted to sell and have them
develop this and, then, this. I was required to have a master plan for the whole place,
with a city park, and the entrances, everything and I think that on Mr. Moore's property
that at least we should have some type of a plan we could look at, because, as it is now,
there is no plan that I know of, you know, that we can look at. If you have any questions
I would be glad to answer them.
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Davis. Any questions? Thank you. Is there anyone else
who would like to offer testimony on this application?
Powell: Madam, Mayor, I did just want to clarify what ITD means by frontage and a
back-age road. The frontage road -- they are talking about a public street section. You
would have the full Eagle Road right of way and I believe it's about a 20 or 30 foot
separation before you would start the next right of way and it would be a full commercial
local street section and that would follow just parallel to Eagle Road. What staff has
been advocating in this area that hadn't developed yet -- and also, primarily on Chinden,
was the concept that you could have some buildings right up front and, then, bring your
-- a street system through and that's what we are calling the back-age road, but it would
be a public street system to provide future access to -- you know, if the frontage road
were to connect with these properties, a back-age road could be anywhere -- really,
anywhere on the property.
De Weerd: Thank you for that clarification.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 30 of 63
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: On Mr. Hedrick's property, where is that located?
Powell: I don't know exactly. He's the one that --
Bird: Is he in Boise or Meridian impact area?
De Weerd: It looks like Mr. Seal might --
Seal: I think he's right up here.
Bird: He's in the Boise impact area?
Seal: Yeah.
Bird: So, what we -- what we approve here under Meridian might not be approved in
Boise.
De Weerd: I guess just to clarify that, Mr. Bird, if it's a requirement by ITD, it certainly
would be up to Boise to implement, but --
Bird: I don't think ITD is stating that you have to have a stub to the north into that
property, which was one of the arguments that I -- see, all they are saying is they don't
foresee any accesses at this property onto Eagle Road and Mrs. Sullivan also stated
that she didn't believe that there would be a variance approved by ITD, but they didn't
say anything about having to have a public street go to the north up to the Wally Hedrick
property. That's our requirement. I think that we have -- that our Planning and Zoning
or staff has put onto it.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Commissioner Bird, it came from the
ITD letter that was written by Dan Koontz October 30th and he talks about the future
right of way widths that -- including a frontage road and staff has just always preferred
the notion of a back-age road, but they have -- they were indicating that a frontage road
would be required and that's 120 feet each side of center line.
Moore: Might I say another word? You haven't closed --
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Moore, if you will step up to the microphone.
Moore: I would make this suggestion respectfully. This is a bit of a complex issue and I
hate to see us struggling with it now and, sincerely, my suggestion would be to go on
record that we support the concept of a frontage road or a back-age road and that
perhaps the details will show up in the plan that we submit later, the project plan, and
can be dealt with at that time in more detail. We will all know more than we do now.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 31 of 63
But I don't see any down side to the city by that approach and I think it might expedite
things.
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Moore. Is there any further information or questions from
Council? Mr. Seal, would you like to address Mr. Davis's testimony?
Seal: I'm sorry. I was outside. I apologize.
De Weerd: Please state your name and address. And were you sworn in?
Larsen: Yes.
Nary: He was on the phone.
Larsen: I was on the phone, but I was out there.
Nary: He wasn't committed to --
De Weerd: We want true commitment. Okay.
Larsen: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, my name is Cornell Larsen, address is
210 Murray in Boise, Idaho. Mr. Davis was asking for concrete pipe passing through
the property for the lateral that exists there now, in lieu of steel and/or a PVC, and we
need to make that transition go through our property and be delivered at the same point
that it basically is now and I don't think we have any problem using the concrete pipe
versus the steel, it's just a matter of determining that new location as the property
develops, but I think that will be acceptable to us.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, discussion? Okay. Hearing no discussion, is --
would you prefer to the close Public Hearing or do you want to sit here and think about
it?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Well, I guess I'd prefer to sit and think about it. If I understand -- and so I'm clear
from all the testimony, the issues -- when I look at the staff's report, the issues that we
had outstanding to reconcile with were a couple. One, I think Mr. Moore has offered a
very valid resolution to the issue of the roadway. Right now we don't know what's going
to be there, so it's kind of hard to determine if a public roadway is appropriate, we don't
know when this is going to develop, what it's going to be. It makes some sense that it --
that it have some access, but we really don't know what it's going to be at this juncture,
and so it seems a little premature. If I heard Mr. Moore correctly -- and I did reread the
staff report as we were talking, I did see that, initially, it was not really a concern of the
developer here to have those Comprehensive Plan policies be a part of the
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 32 of 63
development agreement. I understand where Mr. Seal is coming from, but, you know, if
it's -- if we are really just talking about structure and whether philosophically it's
necessary, I guess I think indulge us and we will all be happy. I'm not totally sure in
looking at the minutes exactly what the Planning and Zoning Commission's reasoning
was to remove those conditions -- those Comprehensive Plan policies, because I do
think they are what they have to follow anyway and so I don't see a reason to take them
out. I think the intent is to simply give notice and to make sure that if some other
developer were to come along of what's there what guidance we are trying to provide, I
don't see it as a real detriment to the project. So, I guess when I look at it I don't think --
I think if we agree on the first one and we can agree on the roadway, we don't really
have a big issue here. You know, the issue about whether or not -- at least to me,
again, is whether or not a concept plan is necessary. With the other conditions of
conditional uses or a planned development, I don't think there is really an issue here. I
think it's -- they are asking to zone it to what's on the Comp Plan, on the land use map,
they are asking to allow it to be with conditional uses for future development -- I guess if
I think I understood everything, I think we don't really have a lot of disagreement and I
guess Mrs. Powell, what I'm asking you -- is because that's -- part of the staff report
from you is -- did I just misunderstand that or did I forget something else that -- that was
of a concern to the staff?
Powell: No, I think you have addressed it.
Nary: Okay.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: And I'm going to agree that the developer has made some concessions to the
staff remarks, but also agree that the roadway issue is going to be dictated by not only
the project itself, but some outside agencies and I think that because the developer has
agreed to bring back a conditional use for each parcel, if they so choose that, or a
planned development that we have at that time the opportunity to address those issues
with more information, so that we can make better decisions.
De Weerd: You know, I think we have really learned with EI Dorado and Silverstone
how to make a better planned development process when the plat comes through and I
hope we did learn some lessons through that and so I guess I feel comfortable zoning
this and would assure Mr. Davis that we will have a plat that comes back, so you will
see what that will look like, and that's what we anticipate as well. We want to see what
it looks like, too, because that's a very busy corner and it will be important to have that
planned development or what will be going in there and so I appreciate the concessions
that were made tonight as well.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 33 of 63
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: If Councilman Nary can repeat his previous comments in the form of a
motion, I would move that we close the Public Hearing.
Nary: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item
13. All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Madam Mayor, I'd move the approval of AZ 03-025, Item 13, it's the Blue Marlin
annexation and zoning request of 57.84 acres and for counsel to prepare Finding of
Facts and Conclusions of Law. The particular conditions of the approval would include
the original -- the original request by staff to include the mixed use regional policies as
outlined in the staff recommendations, to be included as part of the development
agreement for the property, that the 3-A -- that the 3-A development agreement would
eliminate the language for subdivision, because conditional use and planned
development, I think, addresses those concerns, 3-B of the recommendation that the
conceptual master plan sentence will now say: Development application or a site
specific plan with any conditional use, that the findings will also indicate that the
developer will provide further detail with the application for either conditional use or
planned development as to a road -- as to a roadway system within the project and how
it's going to -- how the traffic is going to be moved throughout this development,
consistent with whatever other agencies are applicable, ITD or ACHD. I think those are
probably all of the conditions that I'm --
Bird: I'll second that. That was a good job.
De Weerd: Would you like to repeat it?
Bird: I think the Mayor is supposed to repeat that, as she calls for the vote.
De Weerd: No. I like brevity. I will say that the motion is to approve Item 13, with the
amendments as noted, for AZ 03-025. Is there any further discussion? Mr. Clerk, will
you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 14:
Public Hearing: AZ 03-037 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 46.40
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 34 of 63
Centennial Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north
of West Franklin Road:
Item 15:
Public Hearing: PP 03-046 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 215
residential building lots and 34 common lots on 46.40 acres in a proposed
R-8 zone for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road:
Item 16:
Public Hearing: CUP 03-070 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum
requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio
homes for proposed Chesterfield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road:
De Weerd: Okay. Items 14, 15 and 16. I can open them all at the same time. Does
Council desire a short break?
Bird: I would.
Rountree: I would.
De Weerd: I'm sorry. We started late, but we were here at 6:00 o'clock, so if you will
allow us ten minutes we will reconvene at that time.
(Recess. )
De Weerd: Okay. I will go ahead and open the agenda again. I appreciate your
patience with us. I will open Items 14, 15, and 16, AZ 03-037, PP 03-046, and CUP 03-
070, and ask staff to comment.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I wanted to spend a little time just
giving you a little preamble to the development here. This property is, as shown on the
Comprehensive Plan map here, it's light yellow. They have made it dark so you can see
the boundaries of the property, but it is shown as single family residential. I just wanted
take some time to point out some of the neighboring uses. You have a large five-acre
sub over here in Ada County. There is an issue of EI Gato Lane. This is EI Gato. And
just beneath EI Gato is Pine Lane also. And, previously, the Council has approved the
extension of Pine Street to the canal here, so that has already been pre-decided before
tonight and there are subdivisions, Castlebrook Subdivisions on the north side of Pine in
this location. I wanted to also point out there are industrial uses to the south. Here is
the railroad tracks, an industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. We have got
a mixed-use designation -- actually, several mixed use, and this is high density
residential in this area. This site is currently undeveloped and is largely -- Castlebrook,
as I mentioned before, is being subdivided in this area here and, then, these are the
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 35 of 63
large industrial properties in this area, which brings us to the layout for the preliminary
plat. They are proposing 215 building lots and 34 other lots on 46.4 acres. This gives
us a density of 4.61 dwelling units per acre. And this is pretty similar to what you would
see in like an Old Town plat for Boise city or for the City of Meridian, for that matter.
Perhaps a little less dense than what you would see there. It is a fairly gridded pattern,
fairly regular street intersections, and I guess I bring those up, because I think it is
shocking when you first see it. We are so used to seeing more curvilinear street
patterns, that to see a gridded street layout come through is a little bit of a shock and I
suppose that's why I wanted to bring up some of those items. They have submitted a
planned development request. I'm going to hit on some of the points related to that.
They have asked for reduced frontages throughout the development. They are fairly
regular, 5,000 square foot lots. There are some patio homes that share common drives
along this southern boundary as it comes up to the railroad tracks and they have asked
for specific allowances on setbacks in those areas and particularly the front setback
would be eight foot for the patio homes from the edge of the pavement or the shared
common drive and what this would do is it would leave them more of a backyard and
you can see on some of them they have a shared green space, so there would be a
fairly large open area down here along those units. They have also asked on the street
in this -- you see little strips of green through here, there is a pedestrian connection and,
then, again, little strips of green. What that -- that's a five-foot strip of green and, then,
the house would be just five feet off of that. So, effectively, you get a ten-foot side
setback, instead of a 20-foot side setback as required by your ordinance. The lot size is
-- 4,980 square feet is the smallest lot proposed. Most of them are in the 5,000, just a
little bit larger than that. And the lot frontage requirement -- or proposed lot frontage is
49 feet, six inches. The standard for the city is 65-foot minimum. The Planning
Commission has recommended approval of the project to you. At the Public Hearing
the applicant Kevin Amar testified in favor of the application and there were nine
members of the public that testified in opposition. A lot of them did testify about the
density of the project. The other testimony was -- I started to mention it before -- was
regarding EI Gato Lane and there was a desire by the folks that live on EI Gato Lane
that Pine Avenue would not -- or Pine Street would not connect to Black Cat. Sorry.
So, that it not continue this length here and connect. But, as I said, that was pretty
much determined when Castlebrook went in and that construction has occurred. So, we
do have those connections already. Or we have planned for them, anyway. The
Commission made two additions to the conditions of approval for the Conditional Use
Permit. One was stating the Right-to-Farm Act on the plat. The second was a condition
stating that buildings are -- would be limited to one story on two particular properties
and those two properties are here at the far east end of the site. There is a small
residential property between this development and the canal and they were concerned
about two story properties looking into the site. I think you can see that -- you can see it
right here. Small relative to its current neighbors. I think it's probably a couple acres.
And with that I will end staffs testimony.
De Weerd: Any questions for staff? Okay. Thank you. Is the applicant -- and you did
participate in the swearing in ceremony; correct?
Meridian City Council
March 23. 2004
Page 36 of 63
Amar: Yes, ma'am, I did.
De Weerd: Please state your name and address.
Amar: Madam Mayor, Council Members, my name is Kevin Amar, address 114 East
Idaho here in Meridian and I am here on behalf of Chesterfield Subdivision. I will start
out -- I will start out by stating with respect to the staff conditions and the Planning and
Zoning conditions, there were additional conditions that I will go over with respect to
things that were asked of -- from the neighbors and we had agreed to, but we have no
issues with any conditions that are before us this evening. We appreciate staff's effort
and the Planning and Zoning Commission's effort to work with us. Also trying to work
with the neighbors in resolving some of the issues that they had. That being said, with
the -- Anna, could you put the area map showing the -- I guess the Comprehensive
Plan? That being said, this project, which is located in this area, which on the
Comprehensive Plan -- we did change the color just for ease of noting the area -- is a
medium density residential area. When we first started working, this was the first 40
acres and at that time the only 40 acres that we thought we were going to be able to
develop in this area, which was Castlebrook NO.1. At the time we got this one
approved we were approached by this neighbor to work on this piece and we were able
to get this one approved and they are currently working on the phase of that, getting the
construction plans through DEQ. At the time that was approved, Dr. Louie, who owned
it at this time, approached us to -- or we approached him, but conversations were
working to work on his property. So, as we have tried to get all these together, making
this whole area one feel and one subdivision. Castlebrook Subdivision No.1, in
meeting with the Comprehensive Plan and in trying to come up with a plan to be
somewhat harmonious with the neighbors, had a designation of R-4. Castlebrook No.
2 has a designation of R-8, with the interior lots being as a straight R-8 with respect to
65 foot minimums was the lowest. It was not a Conditional Use Permit or a planned unit
development. But the surrounding lots were larger in size and, in fact, the ones along
the Ten Mile Drain are 1,600 square foot minimum and a pathway. So, that being said,
with this project now being called Chesterfield, we are continuing that same theme with
this project, meeting the Comprehensive Plan, which is meeting density residential.
When we first came to staff with this project we actually had 235, I believe, residential
lots and, obviously, the density was higher than it is now, with five units to the acre.
With the redesign and changes that we made with the plat to be more in conformance
with the Comprehensive Plan and with city standards, we are now at 215 lots, with a
density of 4.6 units to the acre. So, if you look at it relative to the Comprehensive Plan,
it is still definitely on the low side of what that Comprehensive Plan is, which is up to a
maximum of eight units to the acre. The project itself, again, has the lots on the exterior
boundary -- I should say on the east and on the northern boundary, compatible with and
harmonious with what was approved previously, 65 foot minimum frontage or greater.
Along the Ten Mile Drain we have provided lots even larger, again, harmonious with
what was approved in Castle brook Subdivision NO.1. We are also continuing a
pathway from this location adjacent to -- it's actually on Nampa-Meridian Irrigation
District's property adjacent to the Ten Mile Drain. That will be a pathway that will be
owned and maintained by the homeowners association. There was one parcel that
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 37 of 63
would need to connect the pathway in Castle brook NO.2 to this project. Eventually, we
see that happening with the redevelopment of that parcel, so people can funnel to the
Fuller Park and children also have access to the elementary school there, trying to look
at an overall Comprehensive Plan of what would happen to this project in the future.
When we held that neighborhood meeting, the project looked similar. We did make
some changes to what we had here. At the neighborhood meeting the concerns from
the neighbors was that this parcel was with respect to these lots. At the time of the
neighborhood meeting there were smaller lots in there, more harmonious or more
consistent with a 50-foot lot. So, we pulled lots out of this area, reducing the number of
lots further, again, requiring a 1,600 square foot minimum home size in there, being
consistent with what was approved in Castlebrook Subdivision. The other areas that
were changed were these three lots at that time backed up to Mr. Hanikey's property, I
believe is his last name, and there was also a stub road located at this location -- I'm
going to give up on that pointer. It's not working real well. But a stub road that we did
relocate. All of that came from the neighborhood meeting, trying to understand that this
is going to impact the neighbors. We will also be fencing the entire site for less impact
of the neighborhood association or the neighborhood group and neighbors that spoke.
Some of the issues that came up were with respect to the fencing. At the time
Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2 was approved, the concern from the neighbor -- could
you go to the area map again, please? The concern from the neighbor that lives at this
location is that neighbor gained access from an old private bridge that crosses the Ten
Mile Creek. It is not a safe public bridge, it is something that is used for private
purposes. At that time and with this project we agree to barricade this road off, so no
vehicle traffic could get to that bridge. One of the concerns that came up from the
neighbors also was pedestrians being able to access that bridge and we at that time
were asked and agreed to putting up -- rather than a barricade, put up a chain link fence
across the right of way -- obviously, we have to get the issues worked out with Ada
County Highway District, which we have spoken to them and we can resolve that and
also with the fire department to make sure they have no concerns. But they will not be
taking a fire truck across that bridge. That's -- farmers don't take their tractors across
that bridge. It's a vehicle bridge and a vehicle bridge only. So, that was another
concern of the neighbors and we will be putting up a six-foot chain link fence that will be
gated and locked. If the fire department needs a key, we will meet with them and make
sure that they have that -- that information. With respect to these lots, one here and
here -- I know it's not on the map, but those will also be single story at the request of the
neighbor and the Planning and Zoning Commission. So, this project -- we have been
through this process trying to listen all along the way as what can we do, understanding
this will be a change to the area, but also understanding that the city's Comprehensive
Plan calls for this change -- in fact, this is a lower density than what the Comprehensive
Plan could be taken to, which is eight dwelling units to the acre on this parcel. This
parcel has 4.6 dwelling units to the acre. With respect to the project itself, we have
positioned open space areas in locations that are easily accessible to all the neighbors.
We want to provide those open space areas, although there will be a combined joint use
facility, open space, and also storm drainage. The storm drainage will be minimal. The
depression in the ground is very, very slight and it will be across the entire site. So, if
you look at the project, you won't really notice a depression. It will be used in the
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 38 of 63
events, but we will still have to meet the Ada County Highway District policy and the City
of Meridian's policy for drainage within a 24-hour period. I know that's an issue with the
Council members making sure that it's not a standing water situation and that is
something that we are aware of and we are designing to -- and will have to be met at
the time of construction plan approval. Also, with respect to lots in this area, the railroad
track bordered the southern boundary. We positioned common spaces in this location
also to facilitate, again, more of an easily accessible, open space area, providing open
space that is usable for all the residents and easy to get to those open spaces. Now, in
those open spaces we will have playground equipment, volleyball court, we will have a
barbecue area and also an amenity of this pathway along the Ten Mile Creek. So, this
project is a functional project as far as open space is concerned. The open space in
this area -- in this project is nearly ten percent of usable open space, excluding such as
this -- this pond is not counted, it's more a storm drain retention pond, it does have a
discharge site, so, again, it won't hold water, but it's more of a pond, rather than usable
open space. With respect to the common drives, we are asking for reduced setbacks
from those common drives. The concern is -- and I have seen a lot of these, people use
the drives to park cars and the garage to not put cars in. What we wanted is people to
put their cars in their garage. We drive through Bristol Heights, which is an incredible
subdivision and it's a nice subdivision, but, again, the garages are set back far enough
that people do not park in the garages. We want to reduce those setbacks, so that we
actually require people to park in those garages, not allowing them to park -- the
residents to park on the street. There is sufficient parking for people to visit on that
street. That is something that we discussed with Mrs. Powell and we came to that
conclusion, if we don't want people to park in the driveway, don't provide them enough
room to park in the driveway and make them park in the garage, which is, really, where
people should be. With respect to the other setback, we are requesting -- and I have
spoken with the fire department about this project, but setbacks as required with the
building department or the building code. One change that came from this was the fire
department requested -- originally we had this entrance located in this location that was
requested to be changed because of the fire code or fire department policy and we did
relocate that working with the fire department for this approval. This project is in
meeting with the Comprehensive Plan. We have met with staff and spent a lengthy
process in trying to get this project -- this subdivision to the point it is to today, only due
to the fact that we are trying to be harmonious with everyone involved. We understand
with the respect to EI Gato or Pine -- I'm not sure what -- I think the latest consensus is
this road will be called Pine -- we understand that the neighbors may not want -- they
want it located in a different location than it is now, but that has been set by the
approval of Castle brook Subdivision NO.1. In fact, we are currently building that street
as it intersects with Black cat. So, with that I believe I'd stand for any questions and I
appreciate your time this evening.
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 39 of 63
Nary: Mr. Amar, those common areas that are supposed to be the amenities, it says on
the staff report one is 1.1 acres and the other one is 1.2 acres. So, I mean they look
fairly large up here, but I think it's because all the other lots are small. So, I mean it
doesn't seem like, you know, one -- you know, a one acre parcel is more than really a
pocket park in, I guess, our view. And you want to have all these additional amenities?
Like a tot lot and a volleyball court and a gazebo and it'd drainage, too. I mean I guess I
don't know how you can really incorporate all of that into really being an amenity. I
mean it sounds like a great idea, but, realistically, I think we have found a lot of those
drainages don't work beyond drainage to be able to put all those other things in it and
one acre seems awfully small to try to make that a real amenity for 260 homes. I mean
that is a lot of homes and it's -- the amenity is supposed to relate to the homes, it's
supposed to make it an amenity to them and I don't see how that really fits. It just
doesn't work for me.
Amar: Madam Mayor, Commissioner -- or Councilmember Nary, the pocket parks are--
there are -- if you call them pocket parks, there is one located here, here, and here.
The idea is rather than have a centralized park that people have to walk to, have parks
close to people's dwellings. What we are finding is when people live -- where people
live they want their kids to play close to where they live, so if they have to walk to that
area, people aren't as willing to let their children use that. When we do put parks in that
are larger and centralized, the people that use it are the people across the street or next
door to that park. So, the thought was let's break them up, let's use them in different
areas, providing large enough areas for each one that people can use. One acre,
obviously, is a lot of park and I would direct your thought process to maybe Sportsmen's
Pointe, if you have been through there. That is a familiar -- are you familiar with that
common area? It is a joint use facility. It's got a volleyball court and a basketball court
and I believe it even has a playground structure, but it is also a storm water area that
can be used during the high events. I drive through it all the time. People are using that
all summer long. When it rains does it get wet? Yes, it does, but it also drains out and is
functional within the required time frames of Ada County Highway District and the City
of Meridian. I'll also look back at Castle brook Subdivision NO.1. The storm drainage
areas that are strictly storm drainage in that subdivision, those also drain out in a
reasonable time frame, within the 24-hour time period. So, I know you can design them
to make that happen and, obviously, that was something that was specifically
mentioned in Castlebrook No. 1 and No.2, make sure these parks don't hold water. We
don't want mosquito areas. I understand that. And we have been able to achieve that
request or that condition by our design. So, I have no problem believing that these
parks, although we say one acre is not large, when people are living in an 8,000 square
foot lot, which is an average lot in Meridian, a one acre park is a large area and it's
dedicated simply to a park, so you're able to put -- our thought was keep -- you know, if
little kids are playing in the tot lot, little kids, big kids, they don't mix, little kids fight with
big kids, so put a tot lot in this area, put a volleyball court in this area, put a gazebo --
the gazebo and the barbecue area be more in these areas, so those residents that have
the patio homes have an area to go to and gather at a common -- a larger common lot.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 40 of 63
So, we would -- rather than having all the amenities in one area, put them throughout
the subdivision, so people have ease of access to it -- to a common area.
Nary: But your first statement was is you wanted to make it accessible to the people so
they don't -- if I have got a little kid and your tot lot is here and I live here, I got to go
down there anyway. I mean so -- I mean I guess it seems inconsistent as to what you
said as to why they are so small, but spread out, was the intent to get these people to
focus on that common area, these people focused on this one, and these people to
focus on that one, but if you spread out the amenity to a volleyball court here and a
gazebo here and a tot lot there, well, that totally defeats the whole idea of what you
have. So, it doesn't sound so much like an amenity.
Amar: Madam Mayor, Commissioner Nary, we -- I guess we'll look for direction from
you. We are trying to provide amenities that, obviously, in a planned unit development
they are saying provide two amenities. Well, I don't know what two amenities are, so
we are trying to put enough in there that this subdivision is a community -- that not just
this one, but it's also cohesive with Castle brook 1 and Castlebrook 2 and that they really
are a cohesive community. In Castlebrook 1 and Castlebrook 2 the park areas are
much smaller than what we have here, so we are providing much greater open space in
this subdivision than we did in those subdivisions, understanding that there are more
people living in here and that's reasonable to do. I understand that. So, putting
amenities in this area -- and the barbecue area, I would focus that more on this area,
simple because those lots are -- they are patio lots. That's what we are trying to focus
those for, giving those people an area to go to. Tot lots, we can put those in -- I don't
mind putting in another tot lot or something to make this a viable, good community,
something that works for everyone. I don't know if I answered your question or not, but
Nary: It wasn't really much of a question. Thats okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: No, it wasn't. Hey, do you know -- are you familiar with Summerfield
Subdivision, the green space right when you go in the front? Do you know how big that
is?
Amar: 1'm familiar with the subdivision, but I couldn't tell you how large it is.
De Weerd: I think that -- do you know, Anna?
Powell: Not off the top of my head. I can look on the zoning map and see if we can find
out. Hold on.
Amar: For a reference, when you're using a playground structure -- we are putting
some in, in other subdivisions right now, they are requesting an area just for the
playground, obviously, of about 40 by 40 feet and that's for a fairly large structure, three
or four slides and swings and different things. So, the area for just the structure itself is
relatively small, obviously, in the size of a park of an acre thats a small portion. So,
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 41 of 63
there still is -- we want to provide area that people can run, play, throw a frisbee. We
have a project in Nampa that has about three-quarters of an acre and the park itself --
or the playground structure itself takes one small corner and the rest of it's reserved and
it's also a joint use facility. These are for play. We used to live across the street from it,
so I'm fairly familiar with it, but baseball was played out there, football on Thanksgiving
was played out there. There is an area that really was used by the subdivision.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Powell: It would appear to be between three-quarters to an acre.
De Weerd: Okay. That's where my daughter plays soccer several times a week and it's
a fairly big open space. I guess you don't really think -- it's hard to really judge in green
space how much that would be because of the size of the lots, but it is rather big when
you see it and when you get a bunch of kids on it.
Bird: That's Summerfield?
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Bird: Yeah, that's --
De Weerd: That's a nice little area.
Bird: I don't think it's an acre.
De Weerd: That's what they said, three-fourths of an acre. Okay. Thank you. Any
further questions for the applicant?
Bird: Madam Mayor, I do have one.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Maybe -- and I might have misunderstood, but I understand the frontage on most
of your lots are, what, 49 feet -- are you proposing? Is that what Anna said? And with
an R-8 it's supposed to be 65?
Rountree: Fifty, I think he said.
De Weerd: Anna.
Powell: Madam Mayor, Commissioner Bird, I'm sorry, I wasn't exactly listening, but I
think your question was the standard lot frontage is 65. I believe most of these are 50,
but there is a couple that are 49.5.
Bird: Okay. That's 50 and 49 --
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 42 of 63
Powell: Forty-nine and a half.
Bird: Which 15 or 16 feet shorter than what standard R-8 is. Okay.
Amar: Am I supposed to respond?
De Weerd: If you have a response. There wasn't really a question, just like Councilman
Nary.
Bird: Yeah. Go ahead. You're welcome to respond.
De Weerd: We are just making statements up here.
Amar: With respect to the lot frontages, understanding that these all are smaller lot
frontages, if I might direct you to this -- these lots in -- from here to approximately here
are 65 feet wide or greater. No. I take that back. These are 60 feet wide or greater.
These lots from this location to here are 70 feet wide or greater. The radius is maybe a
little different. The smaller lots -- and, again, on the exterior here, the same situation.
The smaller lots are when you get into the subdivision and we are offsetting those
smaller lots by the additional open space and the additional amenities. So, in order to
meet the zoning or the Comprehensive Plan of up to eight units to the acre, we can't do
that with a straight R-8 zone, it's physically impossible to get up to eight units to the
acre. As you can see here, this has 4.61 units to the acre and, obviously, these lots are
smaller than what is your R-8 zone. So, again, we are trying to be consistent with what
is called for in the Comprehensive Plan. A large part of that, I believe, with this area, it's
next to a future commuter rail or what's hoped to be a future commuter rail, so the
density in these areas needs to be higher to justify that -- the added expense or the
viability of a commuter rail. So, I don't know if that's a response, but at least it's an
explanation of how we got to where we are at today.
Bird: Can I follow up?
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Bird: I understand why you come in like that, but I have a real problem with a 49 foot
frontage or 50 foot frontage, whatever you want to call it. It don't leave much frontage
for the driveway to get up onto your deal or -- I don't know. I realize you don't get eight
lots in an R-8 to a deal, because you'd have to take out all your other stuff for your
driveways and everything. But I have a problem with that narrow frontage on the
majority of the lots.
De Weerd: Is there any further questions at this point? Okay. Or any further
statements you want make? Okay. Thank you.
Amar: Thank you.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 43 of 63
De Weerd: I do have a few people signed up. Is there a Gary Schweiger? Schweiger.
Judy.
Schweiger: I'm his wife Judy. Madam Mayor and Council, I'm Judy Schweiger and I
live at 3515 West Pine. Anna, could you put that other -- the other one. Our property is
this parcel and this parcel. We also farm the parcel across -- we lease this parcel and
the 12 up to Ten Mile. West Pine from the ditch to Ten Mile is private road owned by
seven people. All of it is farm use. The Wilders have sheep and the Jensens have
pigs. So, we have a lot of agricultural issues and I think probably -- there was a lot of
protest at Planning and Zoning. They addressed some of their concerns, I think, to the
satisfaction of some of the other neighbors near Black Cat. Our main concern is along
the ditch we are very concerned about trespassing on West Pine, which is a gravel road
that we all privately own. We are concerned about children -- there being dogs, about
children trying to cut through to go to the school and they did address that with the
signage and with the gate that's supposed to be blocking -- chain link fencing. What we
are concerned with, along the ditch there is 1,600 square foot homes that will have to be
two story and my understanding is from the last hearing that the fencing is only going to
be four feet high. I believe see-through vinyl fencing and, then, the walking path on the
ditch and we just feel like that is -- we'd like to see one-story houses. We'd like to see a
six-foot fence on a berm, so that we have protection between the agriculture and this
many people living in this small area and we all have homes that are valued at
approximately 300,000 and we are also very concerned about the value of our homes.
And so that is our main concerns about our area, The other thing I'd like to address is
the eight-foot frontages. My husband and I are developers and builders and our
experience is that that leads to absolute disaster. People pull out, they are parking,
they don't have room to park in their driveway, they don't have room for guests, they
block the mailman, they block the garbage trucks, there is trikes and bikes everywhere.
It just becomes a ghetto type situation. And we strongly feel that that is a very bad plan.
Those are my main issues.
De Weerd: Thank you. Is there any questions? Thank you. Okay. Rick or Faith
Jensen. If you will just state your name and address.
Jensen: My name is Rick Jensen. I live at 3720 West Pine.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Jensen: Madam Mayor and Councilmen, I appreciate your taking the time to listen to
me. If I could have that other slide, that's a little bit better for me. Not that one. There
we go. Now I got to position myself. Oh, yeah. Here we go. Okay. I live right here.
This is my property. And if you can see those dark spots right there, down there in the
corner, that's my house. And if you take a look at this piece of property right here and --
oops. Right here. And that dark spot, that's his house. So, the proximity between my
house and this subdivision that's going to go in and these double story homes is just the
same distance here and from the developer I'd appreciate the same consideration for a
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 44 of 63
single story -- single story homes on that -- on that edge of the subdivision as they did
down here in this corner in this area of the subdivision. That's one of my concerns. The
other one I echo the concerns of the Schweigers with the ditch here. That's a real
issue. As you can see with all this subdivision going in all around us, we are rapidly
becoming the fish in the fish bowl and the level of privacy that we think would be
appropriate would be a six foot berm, non-see-through fence along this ditch area and
around this corner. The other concern that the developer talked about, an issue, was
the walking path and I guess he could clarify that for me if I'm wrong, but I assume that's
going to be on the west side of this ditch and that defeats the purpose -- I was thinking
they were going to do about fencing here and restricting the footpath and foot traffic
down here to this private lane and on down to Pine -- on down Pine and down to the
high school. The high school is right down Pine Street there and, then, there is, of
course, the elementary school up there in the corner. You can see it -- the laser pointer
is not working for me here. And this one's too smart for me. Oh, there it is. So, I have
a real issue along the ditch here. I haven't been approached from anybody about a foot
path along from here down and I guess it's my hope that if there is a foot path it goes
this way and not continue down the ditch there. This individual, if you look at that black
spot right there, I'm sure he -- he's within 15, 20 feet of that ditch, I mean his house has
got a deck that goes pretty close to the ditch, so a foot path wouldn't go in there. My
access to my property, my lane -- my driveway, if you will, is right on the ditch also
again, an easement from the irrigation company. So, to head down the ditch beyond
this point is going to be a challenge with the property owners on both sides. So, that's
what I'd ask of the developer is the consideration along this area here for the privacy of
the property owners on this side of the -- on the east side of the development. For the
Council -- Councilman Nary and Councilman Bird, I also --
De Weerd: If you could summarize. I'm sorry.
Jensen: The density, the housing density I think is too much for this amount of ground.
The reducing the lot sizes, the frontages and I think as opposed to squeezing in more
houses -- fewer houses and accent the amenities for a better development. Thanks for
your time. And just a last comment, I hope you got my letter that we submitted. Okay.
Thank you.
De Weerd: Any questions for Mr. Jensen? Okay. Thank you. Okay. The next person
we have -- is Tom Noll here? Tom, it says you're representing EI Gato neighborhood.
You can have five minutes.
Noll: Hey, that's pretty generous of you. I appreciate that. Thanks, Mrs. De Weerd and
thanks members of the Council. My name is Tom Noll, N-o-I-1. I live at 5947 EI Gato
Lane. I'm representing the EI Gato neighborhood. There is about 25 people. I can
show you where it is. It's this neighborhood here. This is Black Cat and it's this area in
here. As I said there is 25 people. I have visited all of them. There is not a single one
is in support of this subdivision. There is some issues -- and Mr. Amar makes it sound
like there were some harmonious public meetings and so on. I worked with the -- I
didn't work with Anna Powell, but I called the Planning and Zoning and asked for the list
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 45 of 63
of the folks that were notified of -- by the developer and through all these subdivisions,
Castlebrook and Chesterfield, not a single EI Gato resident was ever directly notified.
So, maybe they were harmonious meetings, but we weren't there and that's an issue
that we have. We have -- we are very concerned about the traffic and -- because of all
these -- the Castlebrook and the Chesterfield Subdivisions, there is only one entrance --
and I guess the word is egress, but it's right there opposite our street and even though
the traffic study suggests that there will be no traffic down El Gato Lane, we know there
was no measuring on El Gato Lane and members of the Planning and Zoning
Commission asked incredulously why would anyone go west and I guess they are
unaware of it, a Costco is going to be built in Nampa and the Nampa center is out there
and we are concerned that there will be traffic on our neighborhood street. What we --
I'm not going to take up all the time and talk about the issues, because they are in the
public record with our letters and such. I do want to emphasize that in the entire
process, the planning process, no EI Gato resident was ever notified by the developer,
by ACHD, by Planning and Zoning or any representative from the Meridian government,
that we can -- and our recommendation -- we have the same issues with the setbacks
and the housing density and so forth and we have an issue with the roads, but as Anna
pointed out, that -- it may be too late for that issue. Our recommendation on this
subdivision is to remand this or return it to Planning and Zoning to review the density
and to present a more agreeable design plan, with more meaningful public input. What
we would like to recommend, just in general -- this is not the last of the developments
that will occur in Meridian and I highly recommend -- just my experience with where I
work and such, we get a much better product when we involve the public and to exclude
us for some reason or another -- well, it didn't sit well with the neighbors and I think it's
not -- you're not going to get the best plan out of the developer or out of -- out of, you
know, our support. So, my recommendation is to consider those issues and to have a
little more thorough notification process in the future. But, as I said earlier, on this
subdivision our recommendation is to remand it to Planning and Zoning to review the
density, review the layouts, and present a more agreeable design plan with more
meaningful public input. I appreciate you taking the time to listen to me.
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Noll. Any questions?
Bird: I do, Madam Mayor.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Your road runs all the way to McDermott?
Noll: Yes, sir, it does.
Bird: Okay. It runs through.
Noll: It dead-ends at McDermott at the present time and probably will stay that way.
Bird: It does dump on to McDermott?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 46 of 63
Noll: It does. Yes, sir.
Bird: Okay. Thank you.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Is it a private lane or a public road?
Noll: It's a -- well, that's an interesting question. It's -- 1'/1 tell you about that. This -- the
street here is a public road, you know, with the ACHD right of way and so on. Parallel
to it -- there is actually two roads right here and there is a dirt road called Pine and a
paved road called EI Gato and they are separated by about, oh, 15 feet, probably.
That's twice the eight-foot setback. But they are separated right now and this dirt road
that's Pine -- it serves these properties here. It actually runs along the front of those
three and, then, down the front of those three and, then, back to a house back there.
Rountree: So, that portion is private?
Noll: That's correct. That's Pine -- that portion of Pine, the gravel portion, is a private
road.
Rountree: Okay.
De Weerd: Any further questions? Thank you, Mr. Noll.
Noll: Thanks. I appreciate that opportunity.
De Weerd: Is there any further testimony? Okay. Would the applicant like to provide
rebuttal?
Amar: Thank you, Madam Mayor and Council Members. Again, for the record, Kevin
Amar. In response to some of the questions that were raised, I will try to take those in
order and answer some of the questions that were raised. Mrs. Schweiger -- is that --
asked on a couple of the questions with reference to how do you access the school
which is located over here in -- I forget the name of the subdivision, but behind Fuller
Park.
De Weerd: Parkside Creek.
Bird: Parkside Creek.
Amar: Parkside Creek. Thank you. With Castle brook Subdivision NO.2 we provided a
pathway along the Ten Mile Creek. Now, that did terminate at its eastern boundary, but
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 47 of 63
we also will be providing and have entered into a license agreement with Nampa-
Meridian Irrigation District for a crossing that will connect this subdivision, Castlebrook
2, Castlebrook 1, and the future Chesterfield Subdivision to the public city pathway in
Fuller Park, which gives access to the school and kids getting to the school. So, the
concern of kids cutting through Pine to get to the elementary school is -- I think is a
question that we have resolved with respect to -- kids can get through to that school
across an access point that we are providing to Fuller Park. We understand Pine is a
private road and for that reason we are fencing it off from public use. We are restricting
Pine, as much as we can, from public use. No traffic will be on there, there will be no
trespassing signs, we have fences up to keep people from doing that. With respect to
the pathway along Ten Mile Creek, the four-foot vinyl fence on that, similar to what is
seen in Bridgetower, is simply to have a vision -- or vision from the home to the
pathway, so it does not become a safety corridor -- or an unsafe corridor. It's similar to
what's done in many of the areas within Meridian. So, for that reason we did not do a
six-foot fence, we did not do a berm, we wanted to be able to see that pathway. The
1,600 square feet on the lots adjacent to Ten Mile -- again, that was consistent with
what was approved at Castlebrook Subdivision No.2. Those lots are larger. They can
build very well on all those lots a 1,600 square foot house that is single story. We did
not restrict those to single story, simply because that was not -- we are trying, again, to
be harmonious with what was approved in Castlebrook Subdivision No.2, carrying that
through. With respect to the reduced parking issue asked about, that was something
that we came up with trying to get people -- if you reduce the parking -- you can't reduce
to anything less than 20 until you get below ten or eight feet, because people still think
they can park in that area. We don't want those -- Anna, could you put up the
subdivision map? That reduced parking is only for the lots that have the common drive.
We do not want people using those common drives as parking areas. For that reason
we restricted the parking. All of the other lots within the subdivision will have the 20-foot
setback for the garage, so people can park in their front driveway. But if you let them
park in those common drives, the concern was they would use those common drives for
parking, rather than their garages. So, that was a solution that we came up with for the
reduced parking. With respect to Mr. Jensen, the walking path -- and I understand he
lives approximately in this location. So, he had two concerns, one being the house
location from -- to his southwest, which is a common area, so there will be no houses
built across or kitty-corner from his property. It is a common area, which I think will
answer some of his concerns. Also, the walking path will terminate at this location and
will connect to the sidewalk, which will allow people to walk down the sidewalk and,
then, through Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2 to get to the park and get to the school.
We have no plans to put a pathway and I don't believe the city has any plans at this time
to put a pathway along Ten Mile Creek. That's private property, we understand that,
and we respect that. We were just trying to provide something that may happen in the
future when property does develop. That whole area -- in fact, there are parcels for sale
in that -- along the private Pine Street now. The church owns some property. It is
listed. I do not know plans for a development of that, but it's, obviously, an area that is
looking at redevelopment and many of the neighbors already have their property for
sale for redevelopment. We have Berkeley Square that was redeveloped at a higher
density than we have. Mosher Farms, another development in there that was -- is also
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 48 of 63
a higher density and smaller lot than we have on average. Also, the project across the
street from that, to the -- I guess it's in the north -- or southeast corner of Pine and Ten
Mile that is actually four-plexes and commercial and, again, it's a higher density than
what we currently have. So, it is an area of change and it is an area of redevelopment
that I think people are aware of. With respect to Mr. Noll's questions, with respect to
notification, in Castlebrook Subdivision NO.1 -- Anna, could you put up the -- thank you.
In Castlebrook Subdivision No. 1 when this did go through we did notify the neighbors.
We held neighborhood meetings on all of these, which is -- I understand it's not a City of
Meridian requirement, we do think it's a good idea, for that reason we do hold
neighborhood meetings, we do try to get input from the neighbors. All of these projects
have been affected by those neighborhood meetings and all of them have had changed
due to those neighborhood meetings. So, we did that mailing list from the City of
Meridian who -- we mail to the same people that Meridian mails to. At the time that
Castlebrook Subdivision No.1 came in, many of these neighbors across the street to
the west of us did come out. There were -- it was about a year and a half ago, but if I
remember correctly there were four neighbors from across Black Cat to the west that
did come and testify with respect to this project. So, those neighbors were notified and
some did come and testify with respect to Castlebrook. We understand the frustration
on Tom Noll's part. I'm not sure where he lives, but, obviously, it's further down EI Gato.
EI Gato is a residential street. With the -- with this project, Castle brook 1 , we do have to
make improvements to Black Cat Road at the intersection of Black Cat and Franklin.
Those will be turn bays and additional areas for traffic to flow, making it easier to go to a
major collector. EI Gato is not a collector, it's more of a residential street. It will make it
easier to go to either Franklin or Cherry Lane and access -- access to the west of this
process -- this project. So, although we may not have answered all -- or even been able
to come to a resolution with all the neighbors, we have listened to their concerns, we
are trying to mitigate their concerns by providing -- by providing some solutions to their
questions, by putting up fencing, by making lots larger, by requiring minimum square
footages, adding amenities to this project. With respect to the PUD and things that we
are asking, we are asking these trying to come up with a project that ultimately will
benefit the city. The eight foot parking setback -- if we make that a 20 foot setback -- I
don't know that I care, I just don't want those common driveways to become places
where people park, I want those common driveways to be driveways, people access
their house and move on. The lots that sit -- could I have that map up one more time?
The lots that sit here are set so there is a minimum of 100 foot frontage for each lot,
which, obviously, gives enough room for guests and visitors to park in front of that lot.
So, we feel that we have a project that has been thought out. We have worked hard
with staff, we have worked hard with the fire department trying to come up with solutions
for as many of these questions that have arisen. The density is something that has
been looked at, it was actually reduced from the initial proposal. The lot sizes, Mr. Bird -
- Council member Bird was concerned about, is similar to many of the projects that they
are going through. Paramount has smaller lots than many of these. As I mentioned,
Mosher Farms and Berkeley Square, Tuscany Village -- a lot of the projects that are
coming through have some smaller lots, which gives you diversity within the community.
Across the street from this we have Castlebrook Subdivision No.2, which has the larger
lots. and Castlebrook Subdivision No.1, which is even larger yet. So, with the
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 49 of 63
consistency of all these, we are trying to provide a broad range of what can people do
and what -- leave people's options open. We appreciate your time and I would be
happy to stand and answer any further questions and if I did not address some of the
concerns from the neighbors, I would be happy to address those also.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I have no question and I, actually, have a comment. It relates nothing to this
particular subdivision, but you did mention in your discussion that -- when you were
talking about pathways that there is a concept or a design for Castlebrook to cross Ten
Mile and connect with Fuller Park. lid just point out to you that Fuller Park is neither
owned or operated by the City of Meridian and as far as I know Western Ada Recreation
District, who owns and operates that park, has not been contacted by the developer and
the touchdown point, even though it is along the drain, is owned by Western Ada
Recreation District, not Nampa-Meridian Irrigation.
Amar: 11m sorry, the -- would you state that last -- I just didn't --
Rountree: The ownership of that property is Western Ada Recreation District, not
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation. So, I would suggest that you get a hold of Western Ada
Recreation District if, in fact, you're committed to that by virtue of your subdivision
approval. They might have something to say about that.
Amar: Madam Mayor, Councilmember Rountree, we will contact Western Ada
Recreational District. The comment with respect to who owns the property that we are
putting our pathway on, the Ten Mile Drain -- there is a hundred foot swath all along the
Ten Mile Drain that is actually owned by Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. It was
deeded to them from the Bureau of Reclamation in 1992, I believe. So, in order for us
to put a pathway on that -- the southern side of that ditch, we do have to get access
from Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. We will not be building anything on the
Western Ada Recreation District's property. We will connect into that public pathway
that is on their property, but all of the construction will be within the Nampa-Meridian
Irrigation District to drain and we will contact Western -- is it Western Ada --
Rountree: Recreation District.
Amar: -- Recreation District to coordinate. I spoke with them -- or a representative from
them when we first went through and their comment was as long as you are not
constructing anything on our property, we don't care. So, all we are really doing is
providing access for the residents to that park and that was facilitated with a license
agreement from Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. And, again, I know this doesn't
have anything to do with this project, but just as a --
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 50 of 63
Rountree: I just point that out.
Amar: I appreciate it.
De Weerd: Thank you. Any further questions? Or statements or comments or --
Nary: We will get to those.
De Weerd: Okay.
Amar: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Anything from staff?
Powell: Just that I live on a 4,000 square foot lot and I love it.
De Weerd: Thank you. Another statement.
Bird: I live on an 8,000 and it's too big.
De Weerd: Is there any discussion?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess for the purposes of discussion, you know, the density -- I understand what
the neighbors' concerns are about density and if I lived on EI Gato Lane I'd probably say
the same thing Mr. Noll is saying. I don't know that it -- I can't look in a crystal ball and
know whether or not anybody's going to drive down that road significantly. Realistically,
it appears that there is not real value to drive down that road just to get to McDermott to
go left or right anyway. I mean, again, I don't know if there is a train there, if there is
really rail there that may be a cut-through place. So, I understand that that type of traffic
could occur. The density here I don't really have a concern with, but I guess what I'm
kind of stuck on is the -- really, the design of these lots is small, smaller, and smallest. I
mean it doesn't have -- it doesn't have, really, a feel of variety. I think the ones Mr.
Amar cited either are a very self-contained, very small development, like Mosher Farms
or Berkeley Square that is, really, a fairly small self-contained development that only
has one housing type in it or ones like Paramount that have 800 homes in it. So, they
really -- I mean neither one is a very fair comparison to me as to why this one fits the
character of this area and all of the lots are fairly small and reduced, other than some
that are along some people's homes and the rest of them are pretty small and the
amenities that are being considered in relation to the smaller sizes don't appear to me to
really provide the level of appropriate use or access from a variety of homes. I mean
this -- Mr. Amar's testimony is each one of these areas was intended as common space
(
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 51 of 63
or open space predominately for the people around the adjacent area, but, yet, their
amenity really isn't clear at all as to what it's supposed to be. You know, if this green
space was bigger, that might be more of an enticement to these folks. If this green
space is bigger, that would appear to me to be more of an enticement for usage, but this
amenity is really supposed to be an amenity and I guess I'm just not feeling that from
the testimony that's been presented that it's really meeting the intent of what amenities
are supposed to be to allow you to deviate from what's required. I think we all know --
and Mr. Amar is right that an R-8 really doesn't get you eight units per acre. I mean I
think we all understand that with setbacks and the other requirements. But these small
patio homes don't have the same level of concern maybe that Councilman Bird had to
me, as an option and a variety, but the rest of these -- and, again, I don't know, maybe
it's just your drawing, but the way the rest of these are presented, they look like pretty
small postage stamp lots for pretty small homes that are going to be neighbor to
neighbor and no significant variety of design or anything else in this project and I -- and
that's the hard part I guess I'm having a hard time reconciling is the density amount
doesn't concern me as much as the design of how this is all placed, with very little
thought as to variety or mixes of housing.
Amar: Do I get to respond to any of this?
De Weerd: No. Unless they have a question for you. Any further questions. Do you
wish to hear from Mr. Amar?
Nary: Sure.
De Weerd: Go ahead.
Amar: Thank you for the opportunity, Madam Mayor. To respond to Commissioner
Nary. The reason I bring up Paramount or Heritage Commons or some of these other
projects is looking at this area I understand that those projects have 800 homes in them
and so their variety is greater, but this project -- and when I started this -- we started out
with 40 acres out here and that first 40 acres has a density of 2.8 units to the acre. The
next person came and said do you want to do ours and that has a density of about 3.4
units to the acre. This project has a density of 4.6 units to the acre. So, if you combine
all those together, the density is still below three units to the acre. 80, this area, really,
should be looked at as a complete subdivision. Although they were approved in three
separate subdivisions, it still is one area and it still provides in one-area lots that are
larger down to the patio home lots that we are providing in this subdivision. For that
reason I brought up Paramount, I brought up Heritage Commons, I brought up Tuscany
Village, just to compare to subdivisions that -- understanding they were approved in one
large subdivision, but they are still similar to what we are doing tonight and with respect
to this site, we have, obviously, the railroad tracks on the south, EI Gato on the -- or
Pine on the north, and along -- really, a long skinny piece, so we are trying to, within
that piece, be -- I don't know if creative is the right word, but design within that -- within
those confines. So, that was what I would hope. When you look at these, look at this
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 52 of 63
as a whole area of what has been approved out here, again, from the same developer
trying to be consistent for the whole area.
Nary: Thank you.
Amar: Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, what would you like to do?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Hearing no more further comment, I move that we close AZ 03-037, PP 03-46,
and CUP 03-070.
De Weerd: Do I have a second?
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on 14, 15 and
16. All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Is there any discussions? Or comment? Statements?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: As a comment, I agree with the comments that Councilman Nary made. I
know it's a tough site, I know it's theoretically consistent with the Comp Plan. I think one
of the things I sense from past actions of the city in these kinds of things is that they are
looking for creative approaches, some innovative design details, to compensate for the
desires and the requests being made of the city in terms of waiving a number of
requirements for subdivisions in terms of setbacks and road widths and frontages and
side yard setbacks and those sorts of things and I guess I just don't see that that's
happening with this particular development. So, I don't have favorable view of this
particular proposal. With respect to the roadways that -- the roads are public roads.
Anybody in the county is welcome to use any of these roads at any point in time as they
develop, so that's not at issue and my concern.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 53 of 63
Nary: I guess what I'm thinking -- and I don't know what the rest of the Council thinks.
Again, I understand -- I think what Mr. Amar's presentation there is -- there is some
merit to what they are attempting to accomplish here and I understand his argument
that there are other properties adjacent to this that if you look at it as a whole it provides
some variety of housing. The problem is -- and it's not his fault, it's not the developer's
fault, but they aren't one project. I mean they are three different projects and they have
to sustain themselves, they have requirements to meet on their own, and although it
would be nice to be able to attach Castlebrook 1 and 2 and say this is just phase three,
it really isn't. But I don't think it's totally -- I mean it's a totally poor concept and that it
can't be looked at and so I guess I would be more inclined to remand this back to
Planning and Zoning with some recommendations for redesign, rather than simply a
denial, because I do think, again, the intent of the density and what was on master --
what's on the Comprehensive Plan I think you're attempting to get there. Again, I just
have some concern with the design, the mixture, but I don't know what everyone else
thinks.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle?
Wardle: Madam Mayor, I would agree with the comments that Mr. Nary has given to us
in the sense that if you look -- if you take the subdivisions that are mixed use that were
represented, there is an overall theme and a feel and an overall connection of all of the
amenities together and so while in theory you might be able to make that connection, in
reality you can1t -- I can't. I can't make the connection to those other subdivisions in the
sense that this is just that smaller zoning area and so density-wise I have -- I
understand the R-8 zoning and while I don't necessarily have a problem with that, I do
with the smaller lot sizes and so would agree that the concept is there and I think that a
remand would be -- would be prudent for us.
De Weerd: Okay. When you make a motion, you need to give some direction for P&Z
and for the applicant in what you're looking for, so do I have a motion?
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I would move that we remand Item 13, 14, and 15?
De Weerd: Fourteen, 15 and 16.
Nary: Fourteen, 15 and 16 back to the Planning and Zoning Commission to review on
the design, I guess -- I guess primarily on the design in regards to both the amenities
that are being requested, the reduction in lot sizes and frontages, for them to reevaluate
on mixtures of housing styles and sizes of property for development and, again, for the
open space, for them to review the open space and whether a greater or variety of open
space should be required. I don't think we discussed the roadway system, but I think
they are going to have to evaluate the roadway system as part of the design of the
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 54 of 63
overall design of the current project and I think that would cover enough. If you think --
do you need anything else for direction, Mrs. Powell?
Powell: Could you clarify the last statement regarding the roadways?
Nary: Well, we didn't have a lot of information about the roadway system, the internal
roadway system and whether or not -- I just assumed that as part of a look at the
design, variety of density, the location of the amenities and open space, that roadway is
probably going to be a part of that. I don't think we have expressed any concern with
the roadway itself, but I don't know who you can redesign the property without at least
addressing whether the roadway system is still appropriate for whatever the design they
look at.
Powell: And just a couple -- one other question.
De Weerd: Anna, if you will hold on. First, can I get a second before we have
discussion?
Wardle: Second.
Nary: I think that covers everything, unless there was something else that someone
else had.
Wardle: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. Shaun, you seconded -- okay. So, Anna, I'm sorry.
Powell: I'm sorry. If we could -- there was -- I heard Councilmember Nary say that
density wasn't an issue and I heard Councilmember Wardle say it was, so I was just --
wanted a little clarification on that one.
Nary: Which one? I'm sorry.
Powell: Density.
Nary: I think the issue that we have been discussing is primarily more with the lot sizes
and the variety of lots and the necessity for the reduction in lots -- or lot sizes and not
really on density, because I think the density is at least a lot closer to what's intended by
the Comprehensive Plan.
Powell: And, then, one final question if I might, just so I can help the applicant as they
go back or help the P&Z as it goes back through. The Comprehensive Plan does call
for a gridded pattern and we don't usually see that. Is that something that concerns you
regarding the design or mixed feelings or is it just this particular design?
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 55 of 63
Nary: At least for me it is a little startling. But, again, I don't necessarily think that that's
something we have given direction previously and at least for me I don1t have a concern
with the grid pattern right now and, again, the roadway issue is going to probably be tied
to the rest of the design of the project.
Powell: Thank you.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Madam Mayor, just my direction on the grid way system. I don't think I have a
problem necessarily with the grid way -- with the grid system. My concern is a large grid
of 49.6-foot lots all stacked up together is a little startling from a use standpoint, and so,
like I said, I could probably become accustomed to a grid system in a newer form.
De Weerd: Is that enough direction for the applicant? For staff?
Powell: Well, he has asked me to ask about lot widths and my feeling from you is it
really depends on the design and the unit types and the mix and the variety and that
would depend on -- okay.
De Weerd: And I think Councilman Nary had mentioned, you know, the bottom portion
of that, he didn't have an issue with, it's more that you would want more of a mixture of
sizes and -- or choices or a transition as well.
Nary: I think -- just to be fair, I think Councilman Bird did at least express some concern
about the potential of the widths there, as well as the parking issue, although I -- I'm not
an engineer, so I don't know whether or not -- you know, what Mr. Amar is saying is
correct. We did hear some testimony to the opposite effect that it tends to cause a lot of
clutter, a lot of congestion, a lot of cars stacked up at driveways on the street -- again, I
don't know. I liked having the mixture of those patio homes, I just don't know that there
is really enough mixture here, so --
Wardle: Madam Mayor, I would also just second that notion from Mr. Nary in the sense
that when I say 49 foot lots, I might be -- I think having them all together in the majority
of the subdivision similar to that is what I have a problem with and so while -- if you
could mix some of those reduced lot frontages into a larger plan, I think it would be
more cohesive.
De Weerd: Okay. Well?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Call the question.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 56 of 63
De Weerd: T hank you. The question has been called. The motion is to remand Items
14, 15 and 16 to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Is there any further discussion?
Did we need roll call?
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Council, if you could excuse me. I found my daughter was in an accident, so I
need to go.
Item 17:
Ordinance No. AZ 03-015 Request for
annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
Sageland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road:
De Weerd: Okay. Item 17 is Ordinance 04-1072 and I will ask the city clerk to please
read this ordinance by title only.
Berg: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Ordinance No. 04-1072, an
Ordinance finding that Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson, the owners of certain real
property generally located at the northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East
Victory Road, Meridian, Idaho, to be known as Sageland Subdivision and which lies
contiguous or adjacent to the city limits of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of
Idaho, have made a request for annexation in writing to the Council that said land be
annexed to the City of Meridian and zoning designated Medium Density Residential
District (R-8) and declaring that said land, by proper legal description as described
below, be a part of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho, repealing all
ordinances, resolutions, orders, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith, and directing the
city engineer to add said property to the official maps of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and
directing the Clerk of the City of Meridian to file a certified copy of the ordinance and
map of the areas to be annexed with the Ada County recorder, auditor, treasurer, and
assessor and the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, pursuant to Idaho Code
Section 50-223 and Section 63-2215.
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to
hear this ordinance read in its entirety? Hearing none -- before Shawn sticks his foot in
his mouth -- is there any discussion? Item 18 was going to be continued, so we don't
need to read that as well. So, I would entertain a motion.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 57 of 63
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve Ordinance 04-1072, with suspension of rules.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: It's been moved and seconded to approve Ordinance 04-1072. Any further
discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll?
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Nary, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 18:
Ordinance No. AZ 03-018 Request for
annexation and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for
Kissler I Cobbs I Eagy I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner
and southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 18. We do need a motion to table this.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we table AZ 03-018, ordinance, until April 6th, 2004.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to table Item 18 to April 6, 2004. Any
further discussion? All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: I just have a couple items. I would -- we are trying to get the number in for
the leadership conference. Shaun, are you going to that?
Wardle: Madam Mayor, are you referring to the conference in Sun Valley on the 26th?
I'm still working on my schedule. I'm attempting to attend, but working on it.
De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Bird? Still working on it?
Bird: I'm still working on it.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 58 of 63
De Weerd: Okay. And I know Mr. Rountree's answer. I did give you -- I did give you a
copy of the schedule for development of the Centennial Park. Please let me know if you
have any questions.
Bird: No. Let's just get it done.
De Weerd: And the AIC conference is also in the stack of papers that you got today.
Bird: Which conference?
De Weerd: The annual Association of Idaho Cities.
Bird: Oh, AIC. Yeah.
De Weerd: So, we will want to get people registered for that, so if you will take a look at
that. Also, there is an example of the city pin. That's a new design. We will be ordering
those as well.
Bird: City -- is that what that was?
Rountree: You thought it was the stationery.
Bird: I thought it was stationery.
De Weerd: No. It's going to be a city pin. It will also be on your --
Bird: Pen or pin? P-i-n or p-e-n?
De Weerd: Pin. P-i-n.
Bird: P-i-n. Okay.
De Weerd: Okay. And, then, you also have information on the Northwest Community
Development Institute. That's in July. It's a three-year program. And so if you want to
do that kind of a type training for our two newest members, now is probable a good
time.
Bird: Is that another Will and Jerry show?
De Weerd: No, it's not.
Bird: Okay.
De Weerd: And it does have some elements of economic development and it's a pretty
comprehensive program. So, that is in your packet as well.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 59 of 63
Wardle: Madam Mayor, did you say a three year commitment?
De Weerd: It's a three-year program, but you commit to it year by year.
Wardle: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Is there anything else anyone would like to bring up?
Bird: Madam Mayor, this is something we can talk about afterward, but I will bring it out
now. We -- as you know, we had a nice article from the Statesman on a lady that's
turning 100 years old on the 30th of this month and they are having a party at the
Meridian First Baptist Church the 27th, which is a Saturday, and if you would be so kind
as to make a proclamation for a day and if you would be available to read it I would --
we would certainly appreciate it.
De Weerd: Okay. If you can get me the information and I will have Will start drawing
something up. Just one last thing, too, before I forget it. Next week can I -- or on the
6th I would like to bring an amendment to the ZGA scope for the space study. With Ada
County coming in with their needs, we would like to incorporate that in. Councilman
Bird had indicated that we would like to look at leasing this to Ada County, so we
wouldn't really want to ask them to bear that cost. It will be 4,000. I do have information
on that that I would like to bring to Council on the 6th.
Bird: They are going to bear the cost one way or the other, but --
De Weerd: What's that?
Bird: They will bear the cost on --
Rountree: On a monthly basis.
Bird: -- on a monthly basis, but I think that would be great.
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Well, thank you very much.
Rountree: Madam Mayor, is this kind of new old business or old new business or --
De Weerd: Uh-huh. All the above.
Rountree: Sorry that Bill left, but I'd like to hear something from our enforcement officer
and activities as it relates to signs. There is stuff all over town, continues to be, and I
don't know if it's consistent with ordinances, it's inconsistent with ordinances -- if our
ordinances aren't strong enough to take care of some of this stuff, maybe we ought to
think about it. Anyway, I just see signs on landscape berms that don't appear to be
monument signs. We have electrified signs next to monument signs. We have banners
draped across monument signs. We have fence posts with banners. We have stakes
MerIdian City Councll
March 23, 2004
Page 60 of 63
in the ground with plastic signs. You name it, we have got it, and they don't seem to
ever go away.
De Weerd: It reminds me of a song.
Rountree: Yeah.
De Weerd: We could ask Joe Venneman to come and join us. I think you all -- I
forwarded you a copy of his summary. It looks like most of his activity is regarding sign
enforcement, but it would be nice if we could maybe have him under department reports
on the 6th.
Rountree: Does he have a losing proposition in terms of trying to control that stuff or
are we not able to control them by ordinances or what is the situation?
Powell: It's a difficult battle for him, that's for sure, but he does spend nearly of his time
on -- I think it's probably 70, 80 percent of his time on signs. He's working a lot. There
are a lot of loopholes. You mentioned some signs that don't look like monument signs
on landscape berms and those might be real estate signs and I thought that was a little
stretch, but there -- there are ways to get a lot of signs on properties and he does try
and keep up with them, but I can ask him to come on the 6th.
Rountree: One of the biggest offenders here, as well as in other communities in the
valley is U.S. Bank and they must have a contract with Bright Signs, because every
U.S. Bank outlet has got a bright sign in front of it and they have been there not only in
Meridian, but in Boise, for months at a time and --
Bird: Years at a time.
Rountree: Or years at a time, you know.
Bird: Go look at that one on Cherry Lane --
Rountree: I don't know if we -- if it's an issue with the ordinances, then, we need to help
Joe out.
Powell: I'll have him prepare a presentation. Would you like him to -- how would you
like him to structure that or -- you want an idea of what he's --
Rountree: If it's a plea for help, that would be fine.
Powell: Okay.
Rountree: If it's -- you know, we have got inconsistency in what our expectations are
and what we can actually accomplish, you know -- just some information -- you know, I
think that there is probably some things that we need to do to help him.
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 61 of63
De Weerd: Anna, if he could come and present those areas that you called loop holes
and discuss maybe holes in our ordinance that maybe we can add some clarity to or at
least give us an better idea that the Council can share signs that they have concerns
with and see if that is some of the areas that he has been having difficulty with enforcing
with the current ordinance.
Powell: I'll do that and I believe the police chief wants to speak to you.
Bird: Well, Madam Mayor, if I could bring something up. I think something like that one
that U.S. Bank -- and I'm glad Charlie mentioned this, because I was going to mention
it. I think we passed a resolution or an ordinance here not too long ago regarding those
being up over 30 days, wasn't it, or -- what was that? Help me remember. What--
De Weerd: I think the temporary sign says --
Bird: Well, that is a temporary sign that they get out in front there and it's bright.
De Weerd: They can renew them, can't they? I'm sorry, chief, did you have--
Musser: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, there is a renewal clause that's in
there. I don't remember what it is exactly on the sign ordinance. However, I also
wanted to point out that a couple of years ago when we first started having some
problems with some of the banner signs and some of the other temporary signs that
were showing up, anecdotally, in particular, with the credit union that is up near St.
Luke's Lane, right in there across the street from St. Luke's on the Eagle, we had gone
up, issued a citation, our maximum fine on citations is 300 dollars for general
misdemeanor under the city ordinance and our ordinance officer at that time -- it was
one of the ones out at the police department helping out with some of the P&Z stuff,
was politely told by the bank manager, well, 300 dollars is a drop in the bucket,
considering he made over 1,400 dollars a day on the basis of the advertisements he
was putting out as they were related to interest rates and some other things and he's
not the only banker I have heard that from in the past here, because of how competitive
things are right now. We, in same instances they are willing to take the risk and go
ahead and take the fine, knowing that oftentimes it won't even be near the maximum for
any citation that they get and, then, they go ahead and leave the signs there and we
technically cannot take them off of their property, we can only site them for it.
Bird: Can we cite them -- excuse me, Mayor.
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Bird: Can we cite them multiple times for -- by that deal or maybe we need to put about
a 2,000 dollar -- I don't know whether it's legal to do that, but --
\
Meridian City Council
March 23, 2004
Page 62 of 63
Musser: Well, under the provisions of a general misdemeanor it's usually the 30 days,
300 dollar cap is usually what we have got and we have to go with what's already
existing in ordinance, which puts us into that realm. We can do multiple citations, but,
then, again, the question becomes now are we getting to a point of malicious
prosecution by repetitively doing it and I would bow to legal counsel on what some of
the ramifications may be there.
De Weerd: I think our city attorney is just dying to have his opportunity to speak tonight.
Gabbert: Madam Mayor, Members of the City Council, thank you for this opportunity to
address you. I appreciate being the last one here. Regarding the sign ordinance, if it's
the Council's desire, we can conduct a brief review of it and figure out if it needs some
buffing up. It's my opinion that for the violation to be a misdemeanor, repeated offenses
can be repeatedly ticketed and that has -- that has been done in the past, so everyday
that the sign is left up would be considered a separate violation. They could be
consistently concurrently ticketed. If you'd like to, though, we can -- my office can get
that -- a review of the ordinance and see if it needs a little more teeth to it, I guess, for
enforcement purposes.
De Weerd: I guess if your office would work with the code enforcement and Anna and
the chief, that would be helpful, and I don't know if you can do it as soon as the 6th.
That's in two weeks -- one week.
Rountree: Madam Mayor, I just bring that up as a potential issue. I don't know if it's an
issue with the rest of the Council.
Bird: It is.
Rountree: And timing is not critical. It's going on, but it would be nice if that's
something we want to pursue, that --
De Weerd: Well, if you can discuss it and, then, get with Will on the most appropriate
time to bring it back, that works. Okay.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: If you don't have anymore, I move that we adjourn.
Rountree: I would second that one.
De Weerd: Okay. Well, I have a motion to adjourn. All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Meridian City Council
March 23. 2004
Page 63 of 63
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:41 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
~,~
MAYOR T Y DE WEERD
~~~R-
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR,
/f- / 1dJ I t) 4-'
\\\\\\\111111111//// DATE APPROVED
",\\~'. Of MERIO/II;/......
" ~' '-1A. 'l
,f c} o'{\PoR.-j i>; . v ~
~ .G ~o ~
'::.:$' ::
- -
- -
.:: ::
~ SEAL ::
- 8 ,
CLERK ~ _ Un "Qi.p f
~ '0 oT 15\ . ;?-" $'
........./ ~ V ,,":::-
1/;1 COUf'n'l, \\"
;1/1 III
IJUIHH n~\\\\
ATTEST:
March 18, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 23, 2004
APPLICANT Quasar Development, LLC
AZ 03-015
ITEM NO.
-' -- \'
REQUEST Development Agreement - ReqlJest for annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT
to R-8 zones for proposed Sageland Planned Development - northeast corner of SOlJth LoclJst
Grove Road and East Victory Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFfiCE:
OTHER:
See attached Development Agreement
~~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the C/fy of Meridian.
5-L
March 18, 2004 Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 23, 2004
APPLICANT Public Works Dept -- Gary Smith ITEM NO. 6" A - [
REQUEST Request for Latecomers Agreement - Overland Road Water Line Extension by Bodily
RV, Inc.
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
vlfu
~ ~
~
C./~
~. V)
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Merldlan.
€ity of Meridian Public
Works Dept.
RECEIVED
MAR 1 6 2004
Memo
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
To: Will Berg, Jr., City Clerk
From: Gary D. Smith, PE
cc: file, Bruce F. (w/Encl.)
Dote: March 15, 2004
Re: Request for Late-Comer Agreement - Overland Road Water Une Extension by
Bodily RV, Inc.
Will: Attached is the request for a late-comer's agreement you received from the
attorney for Bodily RV, Inc. We have reviewed this request and find it is appropriate.
Please place this request on the next avaUable City Council apenda for action as to
whether or not we should proceed with the agreement as requested by Mr. Bodily.
If the Council approves the request we will then prepare the necessary agreement
for signature by Bodily RV. Inc. and then submit it to your office for placement on
the next available agenda for City Council action.
Thanks,
)d/~
Gary
From the desk of...
Gary D. Smith, PE
Public Works Director
Mendian POOk Works Deportment
660 E. WotertOWef Lane, Suite 2C()
Mend/an, Idaho 83642
[208} /398.5500
Fax; (208) 898-9551
. Page 1
w
JoAnn C. Butler
M. GregaI)' Embrey
I. victoria meier
Michael T. Spink
ge mbrey@sbe-attorneys.com
March 5,2004
Via US Mail
RECEIVED
MAR 1 2 2004
Ci tv of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Will Berg
Meridian CityClerk
33 East Idaho Avenue
'Meridian, Idaho 83542
RE:.
SBCNo.
, .
Request For Late Comers' Agre,ement , .
22107.1'
R~CEIVEb
. MAR 15 ZU04' .
City of' Meridian. ,
l1ilili~ W.orks Director
Dear Mr: Berg:
This firm represents Gary Bodily lliIdBodilyRV, fuc.'located on the Northeast c6ineI:'~fSouth
Lkder Road aildEast Overland Road.' Mr.. Bodily'requests the C~typrepare a Late Comers' .
Agr~enientf6r reImbmse,melJ-toqvrr. Boclily~s wat,etmain'in~tallatlon exp~nses:.. .
, . '.. ., '., ,,' . '., . ':,. . .', - . .... ',". .. . ;"> .
',During the Fall ,oJ 2003, Mr. Bodily in.stalled approximately 1960 lineal feet of twelve-inch 'water' .
main fromthe '<Vestemend of West em Elec.tronics' lot, locat~d'at 15~0 ~outh Tec.. . e, .. '
Overland ?-oadtothe 'west side of the Bodily RV lot. Mr. Bodjfy's expenses to i $~6,851.16'
. and are detailed':below.' .,
Item
Ceist
S!eeI water p~pe caslllg
.. Traffic Control anq Flaggers .
1960 l{neal feet oftwelye)nch water pip'e.
.. .
. Remov:eand-reldcate,blow offasse1j1bly
Twelve inch gatevalve' -
ten.inch gate ~alve
Tenmchtee cOrllection
$6,051.00
4,197.96,
43,159.20
350.00
, !,908:00
785..00
400.00 :
$56,851.16
Total
~' .-
251 E. FRONT STREET. '. ,..'
SUI.Te:200
P.O.. BOX 639
BOISE. IDAHO 83701
e t', "h
208-388-1000
208-388~1001 (F)
WWW.SB-ATTORNEYS.COM
Mr. Bodily's contractor for this work was Cascade Pipeline Corporation. Cascade Pipeline's
invoices are included herewith and higWighted for your reference. Please feel free to call should
you have any questions or require any further infoimation.
Sincerely,
Jlf-c,_;;;.;y2- a
M. Gregory Embrey .
MGE:dga
enclosures
cc: Gary Bodily
)
,',
/ ..
(
JoAnn C. Butler
M. Gregory Embrey
, "ria meier
I T. Spink
\eys.com
March 5, 2004
Via Us. Mail
Will Berg
Meridian City Clerk
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83542
RE:
SBC No.
Request For Late Comers' Agree
22107.1
Dear Mr. Berg:
This firm represents Gary Bodily and Bodily RV, Inc. located on the Northeast comer of South
Linder Road and East Overland Road. Mr. Bodily requests the City prepare a Late Comers'
Agreement for reimbursement of Mr. Bodily's water main installation expenses.
During the Fall of2003, Mr. Bodily installed approximately 1960 lineal feet of twelve-inch water
main from the western end of West em Electronics' lot, located at 1550 South Tech Lane, along
Overland Road to the west side of the Bodily RV lot. Mr. Bodily's expenses total $56,851.16
and are detailed below.
Item
Cost
Steel water pipe casing
Traffic Control and Flaggers
1960 lineal feet of twelve inch water pipe
Remove and relocate blow off assembly
Twelve inch gate valve
Ten inch gate valve
Ten inch tee connection
$6,051.00
4,197.96
43,159.20
350.00
1,908.00
785.00
400.00
Total
$56,851.16
251 E. FRONT STREET
SUITE 200
P.O. BOX 639
SOI5E;;, IOAHO 83701
208-388-1000
208-388-1001 (F)
WWW.SS-ATTORNEY5.COM
Mr. Bodily's contractor for this work was Cascade Pipeline Corporation. Cascade Pipeline's
invoices are included herewith and highlighted for your reference. Please feel free to call should
you have any questions or require any further information.
Sincerely,
#f. ~-.d .;y2 - ?
M. Gregory Embrey
MGE:dga
enclosures
cc: Gary Bodily
03/01/2004 13:35
2089557047
BODILY RV
PAGE 02
CASCADE PIP~LINE CORPORA TION
PX 1135
~~cU(l,n, Idaho 83680
(~08) 895-0286
Fax 898..0144
[ BIL.l TO
I PlUMARY CONSlR.T.rCTION
Invoice
I DATE ! INVOICE It ~
L~---l J48.r~~
!
i
J
I
1
i
i
!
,
i
I
--1.
f
i
r
I
I
!
14S.BodlJ;y RoY
P.Q,NO,
TERMS
PROJECT
l QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I
~ - - \
J ! CQN1Y..ACT < I
i 1 EXTRA. 'WORK - CKAl'lGE ORDERli1 - IRR OROP SEC'I1ON
1 .EXl'RA WOlUC * CHANGE ORDER'62. ADD CASING PER. CITY OF MElUDIAN 1
! , EXJJtA WORK. CHANOJ! ORPER iIl3 - UP OMDE PIPE AT STA 8 + 10 I
1 [ ..REVISSD ON lQ/lI03 PER l'1U;MARY CONSTRlJCl1ON
< I !
I I I
I , '
I ! I
j I 1
i ! 1
I I 1
I ' I
1 I I
i I !
I 't' ,:' " ...."'. . !
i i~ ~ ,. I
I I 1
1 I !
.j ! I
I )1 I
I ! I
I .
)1 I ':1
1 ni1l!k~ (hr ~ b:u.:I~sl
L,
---l
AMOUNT i
_ <i6,j93.00 I
3,512.28 I
5,OO1.00.L-
0.00 I
i
I
I
i
I
I
i 4<-1 ,"oz
~ G.. I O&;{
. 1st. ,,~~ -I
I I
4 I -4,. '_U---t
GJ.~~-~
J .
, .
Il
,
I
I
!
i
I
---l
578,21(;,2.8 I
!
T,ata'
_1,,___rjO"
LOCATfON:2089557047
RX TIME
03/01 '04 13:39"I1/1;!.I ~002 'oe'~8o
03/01/2004 13:36
2089557047
".~., ~:'~,! _. ..~{l7';~'7::~t '. .~ .:..~.~.. ';'
. '... ,......_... BODILY RV
. " , . :.,:; .~.'" '.1- \+.,~.:~: :.' '. ,
PAGE 03
CASCADE PIPELINE CORPOR.ATION
PO Box 1135
Meridian, Idaho 83680
(208) 895..0286
Fax 898..0144
( BILL iO
I PRlMARY CONStRUCTION
1
I
I
,
1
I
I
!
Invoice
r lO:;:",j IN,;{J
-\
i
I
I
I
I
!
i
i
I
1
~
i
i
TERMS
-y
i
I
I
~~
d I
P. 'NO,--[
1
PROJECl
148-.8ocIily RV
1 OeSCRIPTION
I THlS Bn..LINO IS fOR:ex1'RA WonK PERFORMED AT BODn. Y .R",
f MERlDIAN, III
I EXTRA WOll.K. LOST PltOOOC"nON TIME
1:EiXD.A WORK. !1l.AfFfC CONTROL & FLAOOERS. SEE INVOICE FROM
f SPECIALTY ATTACHED
! EXI'RA WORK - EXTRA DBPTH PEa CITY OF MERIDIAN
jexr&A WORK ~ DEW A'l"'ERING ON 0Y:E.tU.AND RD.
'EXTRA WORK. LOWER. 10" TO Ml:ET 1"~ OFF..sm
'u.. ?tEASE SEE ATTAamO"F.X1'RA WOIlX TICKETS, COPIES OF
,lNVOlCES fROM VENIJ()RS ill; BAC&UP OF ABOVE cI-WUiES. ....
1 .
!
~
RATE
AMOUNT
\ QUANmv
.1
!
i
j
!
I
~
I
1
I
'j
!
I
I
i
i
I
I
1
:
l
;
I
I
1
.\ I
\ -L- - --,,- , ._-~ ,;
1JbW<,...._bU'i."'1 . i Total .".m~' I
I .~__,--,-_..,~,.--I-----,.~._,.~
1.....-..-_...-..--..---- --
LOCATION:2089557047
,oJ
1.l44.00 I
2,334.29 !
1.272.00 i
. I
;
I
I
I
!
,
1j 144.00 Ii
2.3H.ZSl
1,272.00 I
)Jp(a.W;? ~
!
I
I
i
,
r
\
I
1
, [
1
RX TIME
03/01 '04 13:39 W~/!: II ~OOZ . o~'oao
03/B1/zee4 13:35 2889557847
. . BODILY RV
/~."':'1f("t;::,:t;oc(f!"~"~;"t:'~\"f{!~>;i;~}"'A~'\:. :"'; ..'T"';;C.{',:,.,.t ':tiP;;:::....."..... ':":.,,,,"
1'.0.1\0" n35 . ~,ldahO 83680 · Bu" (208) 855-020l · ""': (208) 855-0258
~SA.L & co'N'l'RA.sI
DATE.: 07116103
TO: pFJMARY CONSTRUCilO~
A"t"I1l: EsTIMATIl'iG DE'PA1t~
S'''''' '" ....- _, "" """"'..... to """" ~\ _. ",,- "" ......"" ",th. ",..,- ;.. .....M
w._ _. .........k '""""'" b.~" ... ...."".!...",,0I "",.,..,.
PES(:lUP110N
PROPER'l'Y:
em OR. Ti:)\VN
;>
f.t,tV- qf'
e
~aUPTION " -
otlAN1'ITY . .0,; UNrI: PRICE TOTAL '.
W A.'"fEB. -o'tF ~ \
.. .U
\2" C-900 1960 LF 21..02 43.l59.7J3 .
JU;MOV1;lR,ELOCAt'f. BfD lEA 350.00 .. 350.00
12'" Gi\TE V)J..VE tEA 954.00 ! t,908.00 :
t2:x12xl (l TEE tEA 400.00 ': 400.00
10" G.t\TE V AI.. VB 1 SA 785.00 , 735.00
. Olf'Site 'Water Total: ! $46,602.20 i-
S" Semce at Stntian 8+10.00
12x12xS 1;'EE 1BA 695.00 \~ i95J)l.f
S"GA.TEVALVE lEA 540.00 '\ .40AO
'8" c..900 60LF 16.75 1, I'lJXlO
ylo .A.SSEMBL)' S" lEA '150.00 7~ .00
'fiAff!C ~OL ts 900.00 gO LOO
rre-P PAVE~ ~AJR 115 SF 3.50 -/612~_
8" S~ at Sta 8: S4;502.5a. '.
7" )
ContinutJ1 (in P4ge: ,
BOD'lL Y p..V ceN1."ER
~ ADDRESS
DESClUP11pN OF WOro.<:
~IA:N
ADA
CO~
~:
..."''' ""'" m' ""'_.... .............. """"'............ ""'....", - ... .f.... ........... c...... Ill'
_ .r.... ~....... _,","" "" ...~ ,,-<< ~,.,;o'" tho..... ~.",
ACCJ3l'I1'ID" CO~IGl'lED'
-
~ ~w~n.
---
A(<~ y~J"~
...._--,.c~~_._-----
.........~
'-
_~_J) sygR L
.../1'/ ~
PAiR / )
DA.1"E
-----
(ft
'Page 1
LOCATION:2089557047
RX TIME 03/01 '04 13:39
March 18,2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Department Reports
March 23, 2004
APPLICANT Parks and Recreation Dept. - Doug Strong ITEM NO. -1sJ....! - I
REQUEST Request to transfer funds in the amount of $13,000.00 from Lochsa Falls to Bear Creek
Park to complete sIdewalks
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATIORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETILERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
~J
'i {[or
hi
- p-,
Uti-I
hlfU~
i~Y\D ~~
yo ' .r -rrJ a l
jrll
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
MAR 1 7 2004
MEMORANDUM
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
TO:
Mayor and Council
Douglas Strong, Director ~j
Meridian Parks and Recreation Department
fl
//eqs:e.
~
c::<-
~,f(?vd
~.. u~
c~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Consent Agenda Items for March 23, 2004 r
DATE:
March 15,2004
I am requesting the transfer offunds in the amount of$13,( ~.r;I/-- /'l41/nt: i,/ ~
Bear Creek Park to complete sidewalks that will connect th //'1'" Jr' .
areas of the park, to construct a service road to the restroon ~
building to enclose the park's irrigation pump and to constl V~
fountains. The sidewalks and a service road need to be coru.t'~~"~... .... U~.~U~J .~. ~
requirements and to provide service access for maintenance staff. Over 4,000 square feet
of concrete will be needed to complete this work. These additional costs total
$12,594.50.
The construction of the restroom building for $115,000 will use the remaining funds in
the Bear Creek account. This additional work is needed to bring the park closer to
completion and to connect amenities now available in the park.
A cost breakdown for this request is as follows:
Footing wall for irrigation pump building
Building for irrigation pump
Extra concrete on side of restroom building
Concrete sidewalks, service road and drinking Fountain pads
745.00
1,874.00
552.00
9.423.50
Total
$12,594.50
A diagram of the work to be completed is attached.
;WWW'/.Ul.l.l
~~~~~
~g~gg
rHo:) Ll)(lH."i
hfu1h~w
~~$~~
llil.'W""--
:U~~8~
5~~ ~2 .~
~~~~~ j
...
~
g
.!;!
~
~,~
Q e.
() _;'Y"'. ~~
\ v ~('r
s. .
-~I(
En II
D /1<1''= /
I
fsv.t \ \
D~l )"-.......,.,,'-(.\
Ili~u../
'___ CL0-!-cr ke. ~vi
!J,~4.. 'Si(;.{.CUi.li'rf /,
F/Cd"'" /$A.!( r/ .:..{<:(
T6 /6:.~,tJ".ca''V(
/1 '(;-">"V
u...rA4.
-/ii... ;>{.
'~4
fI,dA..,{ ii,
S l <: .~ ~\" tc
P'R'6<h ISY"711 F ~ ".I d .
To tl..,~.s +h~T--/.
~~"'~
/ ,~-..""",
f'J .e. w ....,'".'"
/ .' j\.=~.'"
12.... e:? ., J;.... I
~.'" ...,. r:;r
""" 5" \-..P r
'~
I)~
/1
/
/'
f
p.;~ Lo.J-9 j
F<H' $e/"v /~"""- L/'Ch.c .
t'
'I
I
_/1
'\
i
,I
I
,
j
C .i-~ .1 J \ (> \
~ , ~ t.! eJ..v" if'" t:\ 1\ t.i
( {
IDAHO STATE POLICE
GRANT APPLICATION FORM
APPLICANT (Unit of Government) APPLICANT TYPE
Name and Address: City of Meridian
City III State 0 Non-Profit 0
33 E. Idaho St., Meridian, 10 83642
County 0 Tribal 0
Federal Employer Identification # : 18T2l-16101010 212151
Implementing Agency: (If different than Applicant) } Grant Purpose Area:
Meridian Police Department Area 4 Strongest, Also #2, #3, #17
Address:
Start Date: 10/01/04
1401 E. Watertower St., Meridian, 1083642 End Date: 09/30/05
.,
Telephone: lUtl-tl4o.7300 Application Type:
New@ Continuation D
Fax: 208-846-7372
Prior Grant Number
(If Continuation)
PROJECT TITLE: Meridian Police Department Anti-Drug Coalition Coordinator
List all participating partners BUDGET SUMMARY
.
COST ELEMENTS FEDERAL COSTS NON-FEDERAL MATCH
TOTAL $ 40,405.00 $ 14,000.00
I !
GRAND TOTAL COSTS:
(Federal Costs + Non-Federal Match) $ .54,405.00
PROJECT DIRECTOR FINANCIAL OFFICER
Name: John A. Overton Name: Stacy Kilchenmann
Title: Captai~ \ f\ Title: Finance Director
Signature: \^~ { ( ) Signature: d.J-nr,1 A " ! ,. L_. ,.., in " ",")
7;:- ~
Mailing Addres~U -- Mailing Address: / I (
1401 E. Wate er St., Meridian, 1083642 33 E. Idaho St., Meridian, 10 83642
!Physical Address (If different than mailing address): Physical Address (If different than mailing address):
J
E-Mail Address: overto n itcQm erid ia ncity. orq E-Mail Address: kilchens[a)meridianc itLQrn
Telephone: 208-846-7370 Fax: 208-846.7372 Telephone: 208-888-4433 Fax: C(UlY
ASSURANCES
On behalf of the applicant agency, I hereby apply for grant monies from the Planning, Grants, and Research,
Idaho State Police. On behalf of the applicant agency, the undersigned agrees and assures that:
1. Any grant awarded pursuantto this application shall be subject to and will be administered in conformance
with OJP Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, (b) provisions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1988, and (c) any special conditions which Planning, Grants, and Research and/or the Idaho Criminal
Justice Council attach to the grant award:
2. Any grant awarded pursuant to this application may be terminated, or required to repay funds, or have fund
payments discontinued if Planning, Grants, and Research or the Council find substantial failure to comply with the
provisions ofllie grant, applicable Federal law, regulations promulgated thereunder, and the provisions of (1 )
above; but only after notice and proper procedure under Federal Acts;
3. Any grant monies awarded pursuant to this application will be used to increase the amounts of agency
funds that would, in the absence of Federal aid, be made available for criminal justice activities; and
4. Project-Related Income (i.e., forfeitures, registration fees, royalties, sale of real and personal property) must
be used for the purpose of furthering the goals and objectives of the project orprogram from which the income was
generated.
Submitted by: (11ayor, Governor, Governor Designee, County Commissioner, etc.)
Name
Title
Agency
Signature
Date
COpy
STANDARD ASSURANCES
OMB APPROVAL NO. 1121-0140
The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including
OMB Circulars No. A-21, A-IIO, A-I22, A-128, A-87; E.O. 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements - 28 CFR, Part 66, Common Rule, that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted
project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies that:
1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution,
motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act
of the applicant's governing body, authorizing the filing of the
application, including all understandings and assurances contained
therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official
representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application
and to provide such additional information may be required.
2. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Unifonn
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 P.L.
91-646 which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons
displaced as a result of Federal and federally-assisted programs.
3. It will comply with provisions of Federal law which limit certain
political activities of employees of a State or local unit of government
whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in
whole or in part by Federal grants. (5 USC 1501, et seq.)
4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions
of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act if applicable.
5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their
positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated
by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those
with whom they have family, business or other ties.
6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General, through
any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all
records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant.
7. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal sponsoring
agency concerning special requirements of Jaw, program requirements,
and other administrative requirements. ._
8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision
which shall be utilized in the accomplislunent of the project are not listed
on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EP A) list of Violating
Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency ofthe receipt of
any communication from the director of the EP A Office of Federal
Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under
consideration for listing by the EP A.
9. It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of
Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law
93-234,87 Stat. 975, approved December 31,1976. Section 102 (a)
requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase offlood insurance in
communities where such insurance is available as a condition for the
receipt of any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisition
purposes for use in any area that has been identified by the Secretary of
the Department of Rousing and Urban Development as an area having
special flood hazards. The phrase Federal financial assistance includes
any form ofloan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy,
disaster assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or indirect
Federal assistance.
10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended
(16 USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological and
Historical Preservation Act of1966 (16 USC 569a.1 et seq.) By (a)
consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of
investigations, as neCessary, to identify properties listed in or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places that are subject to
adverse effects (see 36 CFRPart 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the
Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties, and by (b)
complying with all requirements established by the Federal grantor
agency to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties.
11. It will comply, and assure the compliance ofal! its subgrantees and
contractors, with the applicable provisions of Title I of the Omnibus
Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as
appropriate; the provisions of the current edition ofthe Office of Justice
Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, M7100.1; and
all other applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or regulations.
12. It will comply with the provisions of28 CPR applicable to grants and
cooperative agreements including Part 18, Administrative Review
Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Systems; Part 22,
Confidentiality ofIdentifiable Research and Statistical Infonnation; Part
23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies; Part 30,
Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and
Activities; Part 42, Non-DiscriminationlEqual Employment Opportunity
Policies and Procedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management and
Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regulations
applicable to Federal Assistance Programs.
13. It will comply, and all its contractors will comply, with the non-
discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789 (d), or Victims of Crime
Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended; Section 504 of the rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990);
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975; Department ofJustice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28
CPR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department ofJustice
regulation on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39.
14. In the event a Federal or State court of Federal or State administrative
agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on
the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability
against a recipient of funds, the recipient will forward a copy ofthe
finding to the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs.
15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if
required to maintain one, where the application is for $500,000 or more.
16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier Resources
Act (p.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 use 3501 et seq.) which
prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of
the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
I COpy I
Signature
OJP FORM 4000/3 (REV 1-93) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. ATTACHMENT TO SF-424
Date
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT; SUSPENSION AND
OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to detennine the certification to which they are required to
attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing
this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69,
"New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall
be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice
determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.
1. LOBBYING
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and
implemented at 28 CFR Part 69, for 12ersons enterinK.into a
gant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as de-tined at
28 CFR Parl69, the applicant certifies that:
(a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be
paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for
mfluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee
of any agency, a Member of Congre:ss, an officer or employee
of Congress, or an employee of a ~ember of Congress ill
connedion with the makiiJ.g of any Federal grant, the entering
into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal grant or cooperative agreement;
(b) If any funds other than Federal apprQpriated funds have
been or will be paid to anYJ;?erson for intlilencing or at-
tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congr:ess, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an emp'loyee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal grant or cooperative ag[eement, the undersigned shall
complete and subrni StandarcfForm -LLL, "Disclosure of
Loboying Activities," in accordance with its instructions;
- -", ~- _._~,. .. ---"." -~.-- ~. ,.~ --....--... .
(c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this
certification be lllcluded in the award documents for all
sub awards at all tiers (including subgrants contracts under
grants and cooperative agr:eements... and subcontracts) and that
all subrecipients shall certifY and aiscIose accordingYy.
2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER
RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS
(DIRECT RECIPIENT)
As required by Executive Order 1254~Debarment and
Suspension, and implemented at 28 Cl'K Part 67, for
p'rospective particiQants in Rrim~ covered transactions, as
i:lefuied at 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510-
A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals:
(a) Are not presently. debarred, suspended, proposed for
debarment, declared ineligible, senfenced to a denial of Federal
benefits by a State of Federal com;t or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any r ederal department or
agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this
application been convicted of or fiad a CIvil judgement
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal
offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (Federal, State, or lOCal) transaction
or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or
State antitrust statufes or commission of embezzlement,
theft, forgery, bribery, falsificatipl! or destruction of records,
making false statements, or recelvrng stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or othelWise criminally or
civillr charged by. a government entity (Federal, State, or
local with commisslOn of any of the offenses enumerated in
paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this
~pplication had one or more publ1c transactions (Federal,
~l:ate, or local) terminated for cause or default; and
B. Where the applicant is unable to certifY to any of the
statements in thIS certification, he or she shall attach an
explanation to this application.
3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
(GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS)
As required by the Dru-.2;-Free Workolace Act of 1988, and
imQlemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Suo.Qart F, for grantees, as
defined at 28 CPR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 07.620-
A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to
provide a drug-free workplace by:
(a) Publishing a statement notifYing employees that the
unlawful manUfacture, distribution, mSp'ensillg, p'ossessio.r:,.
or use of a controlled substance is prohIbited ill the grantee S
workplace and speci:fy.ir!g the actions that will be taKen
against employees for violation of such prohibition;
(b). Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program
to inform employees about--
(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free
workplace
(3) Any avai!able drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee asslstance programs; ana
(4) The pen1j.1ties. that may b.e in!posed upon employees for
arU.g abuse vlOlatlons occumng ill the workplace;
(c) MakiJig it a reCluirement that each employee to be
engaged ill the performance of the HI . . of
the sfatement required by paragrap a; .
(d) Notifylpg the employee in the -~~DM
paragr,,!pn (aJ that, as 4 condition 0 ~~eIt'urL~' e
granf, tfie employee w1l1--
OIP Fonn 4061/6 (3-91) REPLACES OIP FORMS 4061/2,4061/3 AND 4061/4 W:HICH ARE OBSOLETE
(1) Abide by the terms ofthe statement, and
(2) Notify the employer in writing ofms or her conviction for
a violation of a cnminal drug statute occurring in the
workpl,!-ce no later than the five calendar days after such
conVIchon;
(e) NotifY41g the agency, in writing within 10 calendar days
afterreceIving notic~ unaer ~upparagraph (4)(2) from an
employee or other WIse recelvillg actual notice of such .
conviction. Employers of convicted employees must proVIde
notice, including position title to: D~paftment of Justice,
Office of Justice Programs, AtTN: Control Desk, 633 Iridiana
Avenue, N.W., Wasliington, D.C. 20531. Notice shall
include the identification mimber(s) on each affected grant;
(f) Taking one of the followingactions, within 30 calendar
days of receiving notice unde(Subparagraph (d)(2) with
respect to any employee who IS so convIcted--
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an
emp~oyee, up to an includip.g t~rmination consistent with the
requIrements ofthe Rehablhtation Act 0[1973, as amended;
or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily. in a
drUg abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for
sucfi purposes by a Federal, S~ate, or locarhealili,law
enforcement, or other appropnate agency;
(e:) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drog-
tree wor~Iace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (0),
(c), (d), (e), and (t).
B. The grantee may insert in the space pt;ovided be~ow tqe
site(s) for the performance ofworR done ill connection WIth
The specific grant:
Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip
code)
Check 0 ifthere are workplaces on file that are not identified
h~e. .
Section 67,630 of the regulations provides that a gt;antee that
is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal
fiscal year. A copy of which should be included with each
@plication for Department of Justice funding. States and
~1ate agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4([61/7
Check 0 if the State has elected to complete OJP Form
4061/7.
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
(GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS)
As required by the Dru~-Free Worknlace Act of 1988, and
llnQlemented at 28 CFK Part 67, SUDpart F~ for grantees, as
derfied at 28 CFR Part 67; SectIOns 67.6b and 67.620--
A. As a condition ofthe grant,.., I c.ertify tha~ I will. not engage
in the unlawful manufactUre, OlstributIon, dlspensmg, posses-
sion or use of a controlled substance in conducting any
activity with the grant; and
B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from. a
violation occurring during the conduct of any granl activltr, I
will report the conviction, in writinb within 10 calendar days
of the conviction to: Department otJustice, Office of Justice
Progr?IDs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W.,
WaShington, D.C. 20531.
As tJle d\!ly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply wit~ the above
certIfications. . . ~ ...-
1. Grantee Name and Address:
2. Application Nmnber and/or Project Name
4. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative
5. Signature
3. Grantee lRS/Vendor Nmnber
6. Date
-COpy
Meridian Police - Drug Coalition Coordinator
Project Summary:
The new Mayor for the City of Meridian formed a community based anti -drug coalition to
reduce the illegal use and abuse of drugs in our community. As a result, the City of Meridian,
the Meridian Police Department, and community organizations are currently developing a
comprehensive community based anti-drug strategy oriented at prevention and youth
intervention. Our comprehensive strategy relies on existing community partnerships with the
Boys and Girls Club, The Meridian School District, Neighborhood Watch groups, 81. Lukes
Hospital, PAY ADA (Parents and youth against drug abuse), Ada County Paramedics, local
service groups, apartment managers, and the faith community. We will also use the resources of
the existing BANDIT multi-jurisdictional drug task force.
The Mayor's anti-drug coalition has met nvice prior to the deadline ofllie grant application. It
has become very apparent early on that there are dozens of different programs being taught
- within the community, but no one really knows what the other group is doing. By designing a
comprehensive coalition that can be coordinated by one individual, we can best determine what
education / prevention programs we have, where we need them, what areas we identify that have
no current programs at all, and when law enforcement needs to get involved when the education
and prevention have not succeeded. We can even print out a list of all available resources for the
community, much like what is currently being done in the domestic violence arena.
Meridian was the 1ih fastest growing city in the U.S. States between the 1990 and 2000 census.
The City continues with great effort to keep up with the population growth. Th
School District is now the largest in the State ofIdaho and opening new schools FLC~Y
year. It is our goal along with the Mayor's Community Anti-Drug Coalition that we will deliver
an innovative approach to better serve the businesses and neighborhoods of the City of Meridian
with a comprehensive coordinated effort to bring all ofthe current programs together to best
serve the community (Community Oriented Policing). Our department mission provides for a
three pronged approach, prevention, education, and enforcement for crime problems including
illega,l drug use and abuse in the City of Meridian.
With this grant we would implement "The Parenting Challenge" program within our community
along with coordinating numerous existing programs already in place with the School District,
PAY ADA, and S1. Lukes. At this time there is no single coordinated action plan implemented
community wide. Our project proposal puts a single point of contact and coordination in place.
"The Parenting Challenge" is an education and prevention program adapted from the NICASA
(Northern Illinois Council on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse) Parent Project. It is
acknowledged as successful and effective by a number of national organizations including the
ONDCP (Office of National Drug Control Policy). It is a model practice program. It could easily
be adapted to include many of tIre otlretprograms that are currently being taught at this time
including PAY ADA, as well as the school districts anti-drug classes. "The Parenting
Challenge" was designed to meet the needs of parents in the work place and community to
address issues in effective prevention of substance abuse and delinquent behavior, and child
abuse / neglect issues. This is an integral element currently missing in our ongoing anti-drug
efforts.
It is our vision that the City of Meridian will be better able to take a comprehensive approach to
illegal use and abuse of drugs tlrrough "the parenting challenge". Such commu
partnering better serves the citizens, employers, and employees within the city,
encouraging pro-active participation from all stake holders.
Needs Assessment:
The City of Meridian continues to be one of the fastest growing cities in Idaho. During the last
eight years the city has struggled to keep up with the growth in important areas like law
enforcement personnel and community based programs for illegal drug education and
prevention. By using Uniform Crime Report (VCR) date from 1995 - 2002 we can best show the
rise in drug / narcotic and drug equipment offenses and there associated increases.
Meridian Drug Offenses
--- Drug I Narcotic Offenses - Drug Equip. Offenses ' Total Offenses
400
350
~ 300
~ 250
~ 200
'l5 1 50
:j:l: 100
50
o
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999 2000
2001
2002
Year of Offense
Drug I Narcotic
Offenses
Drug Equip. Offenses
Total Offenses
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
44 52 71 188 145 154 153 141
57 51 61 172 110 157 168 136
101 103 132 360 255 311 321 277
Since 1995 we have seen a 175% increase in drug offenses that law enforcement becomes
involved with. This high increase in enforcement for drug offenses shows clearly the City's need
for centralizing the focus of pro-active education and prevention programs community wide.
Our proposal provides a mechanism for that focus - a drug coalition coordinator. The
coordinator will function as a liaison from the police department and as a memb ' '
Anti-drug coalition. Key responsibilities will include coordination of programs, f(J~V
changes, and the implementation of "the parenting challenge".
Project Goals and Objectives:
Mission: To reduce the use and abuse of drugs in our community now and into the future
through prevention, education, and enforcement. (Goal)
Objective 1: To coordinate all drug education I prevention programs through one centralized
position within the City.
Activities: la. Hire a Drug Coalition Coordinator and provide training
Activities: lb. Bring all of the resources already available together into a manageable
resource guide for the City.
Activities: Ie. Identify key elements of existing programs in the community.
Activities: ld. Identify areas where new programs need to be developed and or
implemented into our community.
Objective 2: To educate the employers, employees, and residents about illegal drug use and
abuse within our community.
Activities: 2a. Design and implement the Parenting Challenge for Meridian.
Activities: 2b. Train instructors in the parenting challenge course and other similar
programs and make them available when the community requests.
Activities: 2c. Schedule the training into the workplaces and neighborhood organizations
of Meridian.
Objective 3: To educate members of our community on what to do when education and
prevention are not working. (Enforcement)
Activities: 3a. Through our drug coalition coordinator, make community aware of how
and when to contact law enforcement personnel regarding enforcement issues and options
available to them.
Activities: 3b. Enhance community partnerships with business owners, aCQtEY
managers and residents with narcotics officers (BANDIT).
(
i.
Project Evaluation
The comprehensive plan for the reduction of illegal drug use and abuse in Meridian will
take several years to correctly monitor our success. We will be looking at long term
trends within the city to gauge our success in this education and prevention program. We
have shown through eight years of data how the number of drug and drug equipment
offenses has risen within our city. It will take several years to accurately measure our
success. We may actually notice an increase in offenses when an education program first
starts as both employers and parents begin calling in narcotic offenses they did not
recognize in the past. This initial increase will be our first proof of an effective education
program.
We will be tracking our programs success through two different methods. The first
through the use of existing statistical reports like the Uniform Crime Reports, and the
student self reporting survey's used-In-the scnool district. It will take several years of
data to determine our long term results.
A second method will be a citizen self-report survey. They will be sent out to Meridian
residents to gauge our accomplishment with the implementation ofthis comprehensive
approach to drug use education and prevention. This self-report survey by residents of
Meridian will be sent out annually beginning twelve months from the implementation of
our educational programs. This will allow us to continually address areas that need
additional resources and more coordinated efforts within our police department and our
city.
COpy
_ 3' 0. -0 -::;. (l) 0. g. S' ro s 0) 0-::;'
-0 c,g a ___ ~. (D -< 6" (/l rr 5. 51 0)
_Q)<op.~::J"" 0 ;::::.
(1)'3 oro _5.~Q) g ~ co"'2. g.:!:
ct> -0 '3 0. \0 ~. ct> g :;:!. ~ ::J ;:;.
? '3? ~-o g).g-<o (/l~ 0:.0 (l)
..-ct>(l)..-o(l)?c ct>oo.
~.;?.(l)..z\03$a:~ ..-9,2
grog.?@~' ~~ 01&<0
, ::l __ (1) '3 $'--' 0 0) 5' ?
o.o::f<l> ~""cr 5.0)
.., .g,-p (6" ~g
2". to O's t; ro g~ g g"'2.-::;'
ro ~3P o.g 3 ~ 0.'3 go)
@' N 0. ..\'0 ~ ~ -g. :...... ~ "9:. $ co
$3~1 (J>g5~(J>w..((I~
g (1) Ol g, Ul <0 0: S. (D '0 S'
..- S. '3 ';;f ::f ro ::l~' - ';;f
'::t 0 _' -' "'" (ll.... 0 -'
((I ;;!. ::l :;:!. :T '" '2'. :::: :;:!.
......""......::l _' ""::l N::l
'3 (1) ';;f<o ::l ~ 0<0
3;-..<1>' C".) Ul c,uoo
-" 0 0-'"
'"0. I l\l I '
"'2.39!-~83g3
Sp.~ro-%O"al\l
@ '3-~ g ro ~5';r,
'3....-c-;:r;:::;:O):;:!'
"9:.((1 ""(l)'::t....::l
6"ct>o()::lS'9,<o
_'3~.$Ul ...""'....
~ (l) ro' <'..\'0 $. '::t
....- ::l ~.'--' ro (1l 5' (l)
:::JS'~.:;<OO' 0.
(l) ...._.() C 0) c,u""
()5"~' _'0...<:: 0,C;;
_' ::l "-' _ o.!:!' I ......
.zo"'2.%~O)~g
Ul-O::lO ro
::l::l\Ot:!'.? 0.:::::
(l)(l)"tU.::;t\il O)t:!'.
(l)::f 3 ",-' ~g
0. ((I ro 2. .
'f' . ,,",-::l
<0
0)01:-\
5.8%0
-oaO)@
"" _' ::l 0.
~&0.5
(l)$O)ro
a..o.g;;::
o (l) ((I (l)
::l 0. co <0
. 1:'- \'!?.
0:::J0.
~a..,
c:; fi, fi,
::l :::J
"00 :T"'2. 9; S
(/l-' co cy
_' g <: <0
gcg.~~2
_' 0 0' I: 0
::l ::l ::J g 0
S'\.1l-o!:!"'9.
",()-.oo.
w(DS?5'
Q.? -. - 0)
~~G) ro
. 0) '3
~ Ul \'!?.
co -
0.
G)
o
~
(/)
G)
';0
~
-\
'\:\:
o
OJ
e.-
rn
o
-I
<-
rn
(f)
f;
-\
<-
~
m
(f)
Q
o
ro
(j;
ro
~
0..
o
rr
roo
o
t;r.
<:
(!)
(j')
11
o
~
g
ro
?,.
0-0
~~
O-or.-
~\rn
rn~o
_-\
om
:z.O
-0
-rn
5';0.
_-n
00
~~
~~
(f)O
rn
:;0'):>
rno
(f)-\
Cc
C4'J>
(f)\
'"'0
o~ ~
~~ rn
rn~ ~
c(l)P1
\
(f)
(j)
(
Ol(")C-j
;:! 0 Ul 0
o.g<Tl.....
-oo.OJ<Tl
..... -'::J 0.
<ll ::J 0. C
< ~ ^' n
<ll <ll ~ <ll
2:o.g=:
o <ll l/) <ll
::J 0. <ll (0
C _ Ol
n ::; -
Ol ..... 0.
-0.....
Cr t6 t6
::J::;
G)
;u
)>
Z
G) -J
o =l:I::
)>
r
C/)
OOl"':S:Ol<llN
00"<ll<ll::J3.........
3c(O....,o."O-j
3gj'!JLQ;moo 0
5 ~ Q- gJ !!2. 'Qj <ll OJ
-, ;:;; co....., 0. L
-?2:(O~gY'fi m
::JCO-<llOl 0
o Ulc:;Ul3...... -'
c<ll-o (Jl ---,
....,OJS'....."Eg: <
5. <Tl ~ <Tl m
re C/)
Ul
s: 0 ...., S' (1)"0 "0 ::J'"O "0 -.........
<Tl~m......naOlUlaOJ3!::?
::J. Ol -. 0 ::; eo m q- eo m "!:!. ~
o.;:!o.~<Tl""'::JC:;""'::JCD
-. -. <ll 0 0. Ol - n Ol - 3 0
~ ~ i:l. ..... !::.. 3 S' 0 3 S' CD CD
. <:!; 00' -6 CD . (0 ..... . (0 ::J !!2.
o-----n(JJ-o-co
::J ID""" ~ ::r -. ~ ::r ,.. :J
l/) n!!1.O"OJ::JO'Ol::;-
CD ::J. -......, _ <Tl
S' Ul S' ro ::r -j ro
Oleo ::JCD@::J
::J (0 _. (0
0. CD::JCD
:ira~8Q,~g8
roon 5'Q 2:5'3 fll
...... c, .., -.
o ::J -. (Jl ::J ::; OJ
9: OJ IE 0. C>) @" ,
:J'o~';-..,co
OJ-->'....,CDOJ/\.)3
O/\.)' 030:0
...., 3.............. '::J
::r I\.) 0 ......
-. O?) ::J ::r
ro2..- s: CJ)
::; Ul
{J}
q-m<O~<S:Q.N
!!1, Ul ~ 0 =: 51 CD OJ ___
~. a: 6" g 0" 5 is: ~ fll
::J ro c:; 0. ro ...... _. CD -0
eo ::J Ul S' ...... ro Ol l/) OJ
" <:!;O'lllOl~?O".....
!!1.C--.Ul ro<Tl
co ~. Q ~~tJ 5~'a
a::J~o.o""""'eo::J
c:;m;:;" 3!J"O(O
-gCFJO'N5'O!'i.g.
-gJJg?)rogO!!1.,
o 0. -.' (")....,::J-
{J} ::J 0 0. _, ro
(") Q. (") 3 S'::J~
15 $" g 3 ~ CD
0.(")- 0
C:;OlOJ 5"'"
ro ::J Q. -, Ol
o.S' -<5.
eo
Cl
0-0
0;:0
OSO
)>'"UL
-Jrm
mmo
-J-J
-m
~o
-0
-m
Z;u
0"11
00
)>;0
-JS:
0)>
;uz
C/)o
m
;:0)>
mo
C/)-J
Cc
r)>
-Jr
C/)
;0 -0
Om )>
)>< G)
-J - m
m~ ~
~Nr.r
~
03
C/)
)>
o
-J
<
-J G)
m 0
C/) Q)
en
Q)
:J
0.
o
.Q:
CD
(")
........
<"
CD
(J)
"T1
o
:E
o
::r
Q)
;4
Ol 0 C -j
::J 0 Ul 0
0.. Q CD ...,
\:l 0.. Ol CD
..., -'::J 0..
~fflo..c
CDro0l2
~o..g=
o CD Ul CD
::Jo..CD(D
C.....Ol
O;:r-
Ol 0 0..
~c:2
o(Qcc
::J;:r
~O~~Q,w
Qroc~o~
;:<;-iBo~c-j
5' ::J Ol ..... ..., 0
(Q..-.~o()co
. o' 0 D.. 0 D..
~::J::J03c
~0lg:~3~
~~Q.~5m
25 ::J..z3
3 - 0 m
CD ::J 3
::J 0-
- m
~ Cri
o~"" CT\:l mCD ~ ro CD CDW
=l:~mcOl::J;:I;:r{fJ33~
r;r z 5: S' S- ~ Q' ~ 5:"9."9. !>>
""OCDCDCD;:IO_CDOO-j
~-i:l.{J)iilomOi:l.<5'iBCD
-j{fJ{fJ;:r(l)30{fJ(I)""0l
?; OJ S? -0' 8 ~ 0 0 _Ul .Ul 9-
OJ ::l < {fJ ..... ::J ;:I
...,0..::J~3' lii;:rOJ
8 9:l;:;:3.-.Q.05.
:::!; Ul;:rc~_~
o OJ 2, D" OJ OJ
Ul ::J .z'~:J
0.. 0..
83w83w
Qg~QgDr
a.. ..... a.. .-+ ~
5' ~ ~ 5' ~ ~
m.o;:+~.......;;;+
o.....;:roo;:r
;. 5" ;. 3 5'
-, (J) =;' a. (J)
~ ~fD~r
N (I)....
o N
.....
~ g .=C8 ~ g~
c.:gQ25'o..:r!>>
::J (I) 3 (I) Q(I)
~(I)OJC.O(l)S:
o ::J :::!; (I) ~ ::J 0
o o o\:l...,m""
:::!; 0 ::J OJ.(I) 3 (I)
030;:!.Ul 0
(/) 035.:"9.0
033 (I) (I) 0 3
3153;::;;::;<53
@;:+c. {.I)(iJc
...,'<::J.-.OJ- ::J
Ul 3 ()' (.U ::J CD ()'
m!!l.CfC.3!!l.
3 (I)" 0"9. o'
o-c."",co::J
m ::.. ..., '<
..., 0 (I)
(/) ..., (I)
(I) (/)
OIJ
0;0
O~O
)>"Uc....
-j,m
mmo
-l-l
-m
@O
;0)>
mO
C/)-j
Cc
')>
--I,
C/)
;0 :g
Om (j)
~< m
m~ ~
C()61
~
~
C/)
(j)
o
)>
r
C/)
(j)
;0
)>
z
-j
=l:t:
o
OJ
c....
m
o
--I
<
m
(/)
)>
o
-l
<
-l G)
m 0
(/) m
(j;
m
:J
0..
o
0-
'--.
CD
o
,...,..
<-
CD
(J)
."
o
~
()
:::J
m
;:l.
'"U
-m
2;0
011
00
)>;0
--I~
0)>
;oz
(/)0
m
BUDGET REQUEST
# Years Funding Requested D 1 D 3 0 5 (Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force Only)
Complete the budget categories listed below. Please include the aggregate costs identitified in each
category. This form represents ONLY the dollar amount requested for the Federal and Matching portion
of your request. PLEASE ROUND TO THE NEAREST DOLLAR.
Budget Category
Federal Request
Match
A. Personnel/Fringe $34,000.00 $14,000.00
B. Operating $1.725.00
C. Consultants/Contracts
D. Travel $1,500.00
E. Equipment $3,180.00 .
F. Confidential Funds
TOTAL COSTS $40,405.00 $14,000.00
Budgetary Certifications (Initial Required)
D The grantee certifies that a good faith effort wi// be made to continue this project at the completion
of federal funding.
D The grantee certifies that one-time purchases in the equipment category will be subsequently
decreased during continuation funding.
COpy
BUDGET NARRATIVE
Complete a budget narrative for each category listed below. In general discuss the items associated with
the total cost identified on the Budget Request form. Include information
that identifies certain costs as being one time expenditures and how they related to the goals of your project.
A. Personnel/Fringe
This will include total wages and benefit costs. Wage expenses are yearly expenses. This is the cost for a futl time drug coalition
coordinator. This position will be responsible for directing our city towards the completion of our goals to reduce illegal drug use
and abuse.
B. Operating
This item will indude but is not limited to: postage and mailing costs, printing costs, miscellaneous office supplies. This generally
a reoccurring yearly expense. The coordinator is going to be mailing out information to local area business and residents as well
as the printing costs for the comprehansive resource guide for community members.
C. Consultants/Contracts
N/A
D. Travel
This will include both travel and training seminar costs for any seminars outside of our local area. This is generally a reoccurring
yearly expense. The coordinator will be attending specialized training in many different programs as well as educational training
on drug use and abuse.
E. Equipment
This will include telephone, computer, office furniture, file cabinets, cellular phone. This is a one time expense. The coordinator
needs to be easily accessable to members of the community and will need to be networked in with the city on a computer for web
page access to post information for citizens.
F.
Confidential Funds
N/A
COpy
III 1) m (")
a> 0 .....
:::l ~ 0 -
CO ~ :!] ..... -I
w 0, .... ;:;.' m -<
re. CD
'" ~ 0 -...J 5" :::J
C.> Ol ::r- 0
w 0 (J) 01 en OJ
--- 0 * *' t: -h
1'0 e ... :::J
0 ~ III () s:
0 Q;! 1) :!l :::l "'IJ " C. C 0 " l> "1J ;t ::E ;t "1J "1J .0' CD
.J>,. 0 C; m ~ (') m 0 "'. :::l < en :::l ... 0 0 a III 0 m 3
* (1) ;u m ;0 ;I> m a: m ~ :::l 0 ..... ... '< en Ul m
~ ~ !!? g. ::1 J:: '0 m ;>: 3 G'l ;::;: (l)
<ll 0 ;j -< ... 3' !!!. 0 3 tD 0 iil 0' C"l ~ ;0
iil a ~ x 3 " en iil ."::!.".
;j (1) :::l :::l -
en .... (1) X - m "'. ::E '0 ..... c. "0
0 CIl 0 If) X III 0 ~ c. 0' C') :r a> ~ C
111 III . ~ ' ".....
0 ~ III C" tD 0' (Q l> ~ 0 UI ..:i!< . "U
3 w C" (p 3 0 111 :::l 3 g; iii CD )>
'0 *' iii ~ :::l :::l a> ".". ..g. --,
::E '0 III :$ x J:: en '0 (ii' en
..... ::E 0' Z
0 III ::l ;t !!!. ;0 ~ 0
~ (') .'. -..
-, III cc 0 III ..;:;........~.. :::J
" (Q a> tD ..... ::E [ii III :::J
a>~
@" a> ~"O III ... CD
III cc
~ a: tD
1) 1Il
9
{f) ~ ..... {f) ~ M
W c.>
co "" _I\) w c.>
.... m "01 01 :.... :....
I\) OJ 0 co ./>. ./>.
-" ... OJ .... <;> <:>
(f) {II (f) {f) (R M
{II ..... V:J
~
i>9
"" "" ""
~
i>9
V:J
{f)
{f)
-v.>
V>
i>9
M M {f) ~ M
"" W
co ."" N c.> w
m 01 0, ...... ......
OJ 0 co ./>. ./>.
.;:.. Ol .... 0 0
m s: 0 6: G'l 0 1) <- 0 l> ~ 1) ~ " ::E ~ 0 ];1
:::l OJ ~ a :ll III III 0 :::l Q. ~r III
(0 3 * 2, a. 3' ~ III c;
5" ~ 0' c; (') 0 m 1) 0" " 3 r0- D 3
... 5' :::l iii" CIl !!1. Q. CD ~r -l ~ CD 0- ::E
m !!1. a. 00 iil m (1) 1) ::l 5'
tD Qo + CIl ::l 0 o' 0 :::l ~ 0
iil g :::l 0' (1) :::ll 3 (Q ... 0
0 0 0 CD * ;>:
0 0 (=J :::l (') Z Z <1> ;:u (l)
< '0 :::l V :::l (f>
c; a m 0 iil
~ m m {f) iil 0 m "'0
:::l -, (') w 0 0 Ql
g Qo 0 0 0 C') .0 ;:l. II
:::l ;:J:; 0 Q l:
s: Dr '< ;j
(') -,
III ~ ('D '0 (l)
5" iil 0
0
01
ttJ
m s::
..... 0 0 0 9 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 0-
0
..... 0 0 0 0 (;;, .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (;;, :... 0 to
w 0 0 0 I\) N ... ./>. .... I\) w Co) w w w w "" w 0
-...J ... ::: Q) .\>. ~ .... (J) 0 w "" w 0 0 U1 (J) ~ OJ (J)
01 .... -...J I\) co U1 (J) W (J) (D ([) (J) w OJ U1 .....
G) -j C)
;:tI 0 III
:t> -j "C
Z :t> ;:;:
0 r !!!.
-i C) 2
0 :t>
~ "'t] '. :::
-j III
r :t> ..' ~
0 r
..... C)
;:tI 0
m Ul
0 -j
c: Ul
m
Ul
-j
...... ........
I, I>.;
.. .. ......1.)
I.
, . ..... ..
../
... ........... .. '.
. .... ...
.... . " 0. ".
'. I. .'. ';
m '. I.. ,. . \....
...
.. ;,.' -
~r
lD
.... ... m
"
; ; .. ...... -g
...... 1 i . ..' ..... ~
I, ... :;
, lD
... ..
m m !.,. ,.
..... ::::
. s-
.'.'... ::::
m
.' I> .'., )<
J.. "C
lD
Ul '." ;' .. :s
I..; e:
-..j .. .. ....~ c
N
OJ ' I.. ' '.. I'.. I:,... <i
N I;.. ..
I ...
t1l ;I'>
x
'0 0
t1l
0 CD
~oo
~~ ---Q
~ cr
(l>
CD 5'
:J (l>
C
t1l '0
00 ~
0
0'0
.., 0
2'00
5.~
:'r 3
co (l>
CfJ 5'
a 0
C a..
() 0
(l> .....
CfJ ::!l
0 :J
m
S. :J
(fj 0
c: S'
CD co
;7S:-
CD 00'
0..,
-. CD
':;:.0
. C
(l>
-~
S'
0
i::
a..
CD
5'
(l>
2'
:J
0.
~
m
:J
a..
Il)
:J
'<
w
.....
N
W
i\:3
o
o
-I>-
..,..
'. .. ....
..
I. ..
<.
,'. ',.
.;-
I
.
1...1' >. '.;
.... .
f.,
. .;.
....
..
.. .!>.
. !-
I
..,
..'
.J.,
.
....
..
.'. '"
',. . ... .'
. I'
I., ...... '
::1'1 ','+, .....
#>
-.\{,..q
i:Wi;rm,;,m :~.,,'m:::, "; "', '..'.!.
,I''';':,!.>;I::I/<,I,
~.~/ ".::;'~II/&~~~~+~
2) ':.1;,'. . .... .......... . ., . ..... 82l gJ .~ .~ j;1 g!.
M~~I. y:~.:' r;;/~* M~~1~0
b;.:;1 E.,.
(1"""':1 ..'1:.'."1
.'..
fI')
'.1',..; &I;
J'> I;':r/:':;'I'm:r:'j'
~I"':.W';J.
or.:r.
o
'..
..'
8 ~
iil~
(l> ::r
-get
CD Il)
g CD
m~
g,(l>
g~
_CD
1l)Q,
'0 (l>
'00.
a ..,
5. m
<5~
~oo
2:.~
CfJ _
(l> ~
:J (f)
5f~
~5f
~ ~
(l> (l>
~~
3-
00'
m
'0
'0
a
<
<ll
a..
~~
o-C
CD (fJ
m;
2:~
mo
(fJ :J
CD co
a...!..
_(l>
::r~
a 3
c'O
CO..,
::rg
St-OO
00'3
@~
.g!!!.
<ll (fJ
CfJ
~m
:J
0.
m
:J
::J
C
!!!.
3
(l>
Il)
(fJ
C
@
0-
m
a
J!.
<ll
g,
<'
CD
(fJ
5'
!!:.
~
::r
!!l.
m
ro
5'
CD
'tI
~ :t>
(fJ C) n
o 0 n
-I>-~~~::Jo.o
~~t;;~~t1lS
O.....J.oo- -
-I>-OOOC)
"CQ<<g
-;::1<<<.....
C) =;; ro I.~ .~ !-'!
}> 0 al(D ro
"U33(fJ(fJ
!B~CD~
en- rn
:--~ r
::JID ;J:>
(fJ::J ~
Co "
03 CD =1'
:Jb (l)
0..... 0
(l) ~ :J
':2. ~
o'
ID
0-
~
-j
o
it
r
"'t]
m
;:tI
en
o
z
z
m
r
n
o
en
-j
Ul
o
t1l
CfJ
o
~.
0'
:J
o
....
m
x
"0
m
::J
&.
2'
..,
m
Z
t:
3
0-
m
...
o
.....
"
!::.
....
-j.
~r !',.. .........
ClI :; ....
"'t] "
o
~
0':.'
ill ....
M M ~',Hfl fI') M :i r "
... .\"'.<,:
3'
lD :t>~
m 3.g I.
><
"C o 0 .~
..
:s ~ ~ ..'........,.. ..
e: ./>. ->, W
C co -l'- ~
iil ~ Co I , , -..j ii' "
'" ">l -I>-
N N 0 .',
Im[
~
-
o
~
m
"
"C
.. g
&.
C
i' m
.Q":-"~
2:~-g
(fJ (fJ :J
CllQQ,
:J -,
::rg';nt
~~).;
@~t;
~~~
~m-~
co III
-, ::J
.go.
~~
_. ro
(fJ
1!!~
CD q.
- III
g."
g,~
(l) ro
<5 (I)
-'D ~
o <:
~ (tl
.g 2
"8~
.., III
2'0.<
2,
.:;:
...... .'8
i =
; .0.
...[l).
I,. .
~~<bp~t
CD
en
5'
III
;-
[l)
a..
c
;:tI,g
t1l III
.D;l.
C 3
rp ClI
~:J
,1!:E.
...
'..
.
;,.,.;.
.>
..<
,..:
,;
~
r::ro
-. ClI
~-_'(n-.
u, Q
-[
~.
I..
m
:J
=:r
OJ
::J
o
(l)
3
<ll
3-
.
'Tl
-<
I\)
o
o
en
March 12, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEEfING
APPLICANT
March 16, 2004
ITEM NO. J7
REQUEST Ordinance - Administrative AssIstant to the Mayor
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SmLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached Ordinance
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
March 18, 2004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Quasar Development, LLC
AZ 03-015
March 23, 2004
ITEM NO.
17
REQUEST Ordinance - Request for annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones
for proposed Sageland Planned Development - northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road
and East Victory Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached Ordinance
~ {01,V
_/ J!04/
()vfl ;/
V
rrf
Contacted:
EmaHed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
P\euse t} \- G r ? u'o\i ~ Non cc .1F~v~nKSJ U
l
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Bill Nary
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of January 27, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of February 10, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C. Tabled from March 16, 2004: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval: AZ 03-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
5 acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler (Dealv Parcel) by BRS
Architects - southeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle
Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 03-
021 Request for reconsideration for annexation and zoning of
114.52 acres from RUT to R-8 (PD) and C-G zones for proposed
Redfeather Estates Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates
Development, LLC - south of East Ustick Road and east of North
Eagle Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 03-
024 Request for reconsideration for revised Preliminary Plat
approval of 302 building lots and 28 other lots on 90.29 acres in a
Meridian City Council Agenda - Mall.:;h 23, 2004 Page 1 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
proposed R-B (PO) zone for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-041 Request for reconsideration for revised Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development for single-family residential use
with reduced setbacks, lot sizes, lot frontages, house sizes and
increased block lengths for proposed Redfeather Estates
Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - south
of East Ustick Road and east of North Eagle Road:
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law f ro Approval: PP 03-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 11 commercial
building lots 1 common lot on 15.B acres in a C-G zone for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-066 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a modification to
the existing Conditional Use Permit (Planned Development) for
Sparrowhawk Subdivision by David Waldron - northeast corner
of North Nola Road and East Franklin Road:
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
03-068 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for professional office
and retail use in a C-G zone as required by the Final Plat for
Mallane Professional Offices by Thomas R. Williams - south of
North Hickory Way and north of East Fairview Avenue:
J. Development Agreement: AZ 03-015 Request for annexation
and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
SaQeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC -
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory
Road:
K. Development Agreement: AZ 03-018 Request for annexation
and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for Kissler I
Cobbs I Eagy I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner and
southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
6. Department Reports
A. Public Works Department - Gary Smith
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 2 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 88&-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
1. Request for Latecomers Agreement - Overland Road
Water Line Extension by Bodily RV, Inc.:
B. Parks and Recreation Department - Doug Strong
1. Request to transfer funds in the amount of $13,000.00
from Lochsa Falls to Bear Creek Park to complete
sidewalks:
C. Planning and Zoning Department -- Anna Powell
1. Discuss letter of support for the City of Star Area of
Impact Amendment:
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
8. FP 04-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 75 single-family
residential building lots and 11 common lots on 22.16 acres in an R-8
zone for Champion Park Subdivision No.2 by Hillview Development
Corporation - west of North Eagle Road and north of East Ustick Road:
9. FP 04-016 Request for Final Plat approval for 35 commercial building lots
and 4 common lots on 80.51 acres in a C-G zone for Silverstone
Campus Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - east of South Eagle
Road on the south side of East Overland Road:
10. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: AZ 03-027 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 140.97 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for
proposed Sa~uaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -
north side of East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
11. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: PP 03-032 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 461 single-family building lots and 43
common lots on 140.25 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
SaQuaro Canyon Estates Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of
East McMillan Road and east of North Meridian Road:
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 9, 2004: CUP 03-058 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for reduced
requirements for frontages, lot sizes, and minimum house size and
permission to have two cul-de-sac lengths exceed the maximum length in
a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Saguaro Canyon Estates
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - north side of East McMillan Road and
east of North Meridian Road:
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23, 2004 Page 3 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shaU become propelty of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
13. Public Hearing: AZ 03-025 Request for annexation and zoning of 57.84
acres from RUT to C-G zones for Blue Marlin by W. H. Moore Company -
northwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle Road:
14. Public Hearing: AZ 03-037 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 46.40
acres from RUT to R-8 zone for proposed Chestetiield Subdivision by
Centennial Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north
of West Franklin Road:
15. Public Hearing: PP 03-046 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 215
residential building lots and 34 common lots on 46.40 acres in a proposed
R-8 zone for proposed Chesteriield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road:
16. Public Hearing: CUP 03-070 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum
requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio
homes for proposed Chesteriield Subdivision by Centennial
Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat Road and north of West
Franklin Road:
17. Ordinance No. AZ 03-015 Request for
annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed
Saqeland Planned Development by Quasar Development, LLC
northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road:
18. Ordinance No. AZ 03-018 Request for
annexation and zoning of 43.86 +/- acres from RT to C-G zones for
Kissler I Cobbs I Eaav I Ruwe by BRS Architects - southwest corner
and southeast corner of North Eagle Road and East Ustick Road:
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 23.2004 Page 4 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
i
** TX !RMATION REPORT ** AS OF MAR 24 '04"'",'29 PAGE. 01
C1TY OF MERID[AN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE M[N/SEC PGS CMDtI STl'lTUS
07 03/23 23:41 38101613 EC--S 02'46" 005 25til OK
08 03/23 23: 45 PUBLl C WORKS EC--S 131'37" e05 250 OK
09 03/23 23'47 12084664405 EC-S 01' 38" 0e5 250 OK
10 03/23 23:49 8841159 EC-S 01'38" 005 250 OK
11 03/23 23:51 20S8840744 EC--S 01'36" 005 2513 OK
12 1331'23 23: 53 POL 1 CE DEFT EC--S 01'36" 1305 2513 OK
13 03/23 23'55 89855131 EC--S 01'36" ee5 250 OK
14 133/23 23:57 L!8RAAY EC--S 02'10" e05 250 OK
15 03/24 00:1313 92083776449 EC--S 131'36" 0135 250 OK
16 03/24 00:02 2138 388 6924 EC--S e2'e7" 1305 25@ OK
17 03/24 013: 05 2088886854 EC-S 01'35" 005 250 OK
18 03/24 013:137 200 895 13390 EC--S 01'36" 1305 250 OK
19 03/24 130:09 208 387 6393 EC--S El1'36" 0El5 25@ OK
20 03/24 0El'11 ADA CTV DEVELMT EC--S 01 ' 36" 1305 25121 OK
21 @3/24 00: 14 88851352 EC--S e1'3S" 0135 250 OK
22 133/24 eel: 16 CHERRY LANE G3--S 03' 14" 005 250 OK
23 03/24 Ele:19 POST OFFICE EC--S 02'51" 005 25121 OK
24 03/24 e@:23 WAHO ATHLETIC C EC-S 01'37" e05 250 OK
2S 03/24 013:25 [D PRESS TR[BUNE EC-S 131'37" El05 2513 OK
26 03/24 1313:27 213888867131 EC--5 01'36" 13135 25121 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CllY COUNCil REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 23, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle )<: Bill Nary
~ Charlie Rountree :=L Keith Bird
---K- Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: tn~aV
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Burton Roberts with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: ;-r~f."".f.u<--
4. Adoption of the Agenda: arrlN..::J;.[' 6~1!G-
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of January 27, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeting: ~fI"'C....
B. Approve minutes of February 10, 2004 City Council Regular
Meeling: ~..v.(...
C. Tabled from March 16. 2004: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval: AZ 03-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
5 acres from RT to CoG zones for Kissler (Dearv Parcell by BRS
Architects - southeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle
Road: ~V'L-
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 03-
021 Request for reconsideration for annexation and zoning of
114.52 acres from RUT to R-8 (PO) and C-G zones for proposed
Redfeather Estates Subdivision No.2 by Packard Estates
Development, lLC - south of East Ustick Road and east of North
Eagle Road: ./a,.6a -f,:;o 0/-7 f / 2,?t:' 4-
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 03-
024 Request for reconsideration for revised Preliminary Plat
approval of 302 building Jots and 28 other lots on 90.29 acres in a
Mcrid~;'J1l Cit)' COUfiC.IJ Ag:r:llda- M.cn::h 2), 2004 P.Ilg.c I of4
An In.'\\e.M:U pr60'11td ~tpublic mtl!:ti!l.&$.sbzIH l'te,come ,p~'O.pt:l1Yorfhc Ciryof MC'ridb.n.
AnYClnC dc..<:ilring ~mmocbdon for di.o:"bilitit:l: rc.blro lo dotUn1l:'lJts'andlLlf ~rin~
plcaseo::rr.\.ilC1 lktCityCltrll.''So Office ~t a.ea.44n atlcaSl-40thoul;'S pri-ortQ tlle p\.lbli~ m~tit'.~.
(
*>1< TX\. 1 RMAT ION REPORT >k>k AS OF MAR 26 '04 1""07 PAGE. 01
ClTY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/5EC PGS CMDll STATUS
02 03/26 11'41 PUBLIC WORK5 EC--5 00' 21" 001 017 OK
133 03/26 11'42 8841159 EC-5 00'21" 001 1317 OK
e4 03/26 11'43 2088840744 EC--S 130'21" 0131 1317 OK
135 0,3/26 11: 44 POLlCE DEPT EC-S 021'22" 0131 017 OK
06 03/26 11'44 8985501 EC--S 1313'22" 13131 1317 OK
137 03/26 11:45 LIBRARY EC--S 013'24" 1301 1317 OK
00 03/26 11'46 92083776449 EC--S 1313'21" 0131 1317 OK
09 03/26 11: 47 200 388 6924 EC--S 013'23" 1301 017 OK
113 133/26 11' 48 2088886854 EC--S 00' 21" 001 1317 OK
11 03/26 11' 49 208 895 03913 EC--S 130'21" 001 1317 OK
12 133/26 11: sa 1283000413 G3--S 013'26" 001 017 OK
13 213/26 11' 51 208 387 6393 EC--S 013'22" 1301 1317 OK
14 133/26 11: 52 ADA CTY DEVElMT EC--S 130'21" 001 017 OK
15 03/26 11' 53 8885052 EC--S 00'20" 0131 017 OK
16 03/26 11: 54 CHERRY LANE G3-S 013'39" 001 017 OK
17 03/26 11'55 POST OFFICE EC--S 1210'30" 001 017 OK
18 03/26 11'56 IDAHO ATI-LETlC C EC-S 00'21" 001 017 OK
19 03/26 11'57 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S B0'20" 001 017 OK
20 03/26 11' 58 2088886701 EC--S 00' 21" 001 017 OK
21 03/26 12'03 12e84664405 EC--S 00'22" 001 1317 OK
22 03/26 12'137 3810160 EC-S 1313'30" 001 1317 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?\fo.se FOs+ .hJr l11bliC- Notie.e.-t~ -Iho.nr.s\
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
AND
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
JOINT WORKSHOP / SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Meridian Police Station Conference Room
1401 East Watertower, Meridian, 10
1. Ro/J-ca/J:
Shaun Wardle _ Bill Nary
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
David Zaremba _ David Moe
Wendy Newton-Huckabay _ Michael Rohm
_ Chairman Keith Borup
2. Introductions;
3. Presentation of Meridian Development Corporation Annual Report for
2003 FY:
4. Discussion of Public Hearing Procedures:
5. Discussion of Presentation Procedures:
6. Discussion of General/Miscellaneous Agenda Item;
7. Discussion of Roles and Responsibilities (City Council, P & Z
Commission, Staff):
Meridian City Council and Planning 8. Zoning Commission Joint Workshop I Special Mealing Agenda
March 30, 2004 - Page 1 of 1
All malerieLs presented at public meetings shall berome property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearings, please conlact the CIl)'
Clem's Office at 888-4433 alleast48 hours prior to the public meeting.
** TX CONi' ..:!T[ON REPORT **
DATE TIME TO/FROM
24 03/26 15:04 3810160
25 03/26 15:05 PUBLIC WORKS
26 03/26 15:06 12084664405
27 03/26 15:07 8841159
28 03/26 15:08 2088840744
29 03/26 15:09 POLICE DEPT
30 03/26 15:109985501
31 03/26 15:11 LIBRARY
32 03/26 15:1292083776449
(
AS OF MAR 26 '04 15:12 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MODE MIWSEC PGS CMDll STATUS
EC--S 00'36" 001 021 OK
EC--S 00'26" 001 021 OK
EC--S 00'26" 001 1321 OK
EC--S 00'26" 01Zl1 021 OK
EC--S 00'26" 001 021 OK
EC--S 00'26" 001 021 OK
EC--S 00'25" e01 021 OK
EC--S 00'31" 001 021 OK
EC--S 00' 25" 081 021 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
neD s.c 1-6st- tOr 'PuP)) ~ tJo-h Q.c lh~ U
MA VOR
Tommy de Weerd
1-EGAI. DEl'^RTMEtlT
(208) 46G.Dzn . FAX d0.d40S
PARKS & RECRaATION
(2U~) 888-3579 . Fa. 898-550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(Z08) BDS.SSOO' F~~ SB7-l29'1
8UIWINQ DnPARTMENT
(208) B87-2211 . F,,-, 8S7-1297
PLANNING &. ZONING
(20S} 8S4.S~3J . Fox 888.6854
~;:;;;IICrn
CITY COUNCIL MEMBEll-S
ShaUll Wordle
William L. M. No')'
Charlet M. Rout\1;l'4e
Keitll BU'd
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
&
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY G1VEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
and the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a Special Joint
Workshop at the Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Watertower, Meridian,
loaho, on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. The Meridian City Council and
items:
the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will be discussing the following
Presentation of Meridian DeveTopment Corporation Annual Report
for 2003 FY
Discussion of Public Hearing Procedures
Discussion of Presentation Procedures
Discussion of General/ Misce//aneous Agenda flem
Discussion of RaTes and Responsibilities (City Council, P&Z
Commission, Staff)
t-1a~I1. ~ D ifUG- rr~ \ h ~t hf ~lt:'J( fU\
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CI CLE K .
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERlDlAL"i, IDAHO 83642. (208) 888-4433
Cuy Clerk Office Fa~ (208) 888.4218 . HWlIan Resources pro;: (2Q8) 884-8123 . F;nanc~ & UllUly Billing F3.X (208) 887-4S13
i AS OF MAR 26 ' l:l4 15: 28 PAGE. 01
** TX COi. 1ATl ON REPORT **
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE lIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDll STATUS
01 03/26 15:12 208 388 6924 EC--S 00'3e" 001 e21 OK
02 03/26 15:14 2088886854 EC--S 00'25" 001 021 OK
03 133/26 15:15 200 895 13390 EC--S 00'25" 001 021 OK
04 03/2615:162083876393 EC--S 013'26" 001 e21 OK
05 e3/26 15:17 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC--S 013'26" 001 021 OK
06 03/26 15:18 8885052 EC--S 00'24" 001 021 OK
07 133/2615:19 CHERKY LANE G3--S 00'43" 001 021 OK
08 03/26 15:20 POST OFFICE EC--S eliiJ'36" 1301 021 OK
09 03/26 15:21 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 013'26" 001 021 OK
10 03/26 15:22 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00'25" 001 021 OK
11 03/26 15:24 2088886701 EC--S 00'26" e01 021 OK
12 03/26 15:28 128300040 G3--S 00'30" 081 021 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REo s, c.. ~ + tOr ?u..PH ~ tJc-h C-c. ~llf\rS U
MA YOR
Tammy de Wecrd
C>f;f;;;dlan
Ll!GAI. OSPhRTMENT
C"OBi 466.?2'12 . FAX 4M.d40~
PARKS & RE.CRt:"'TION
(20~) BS8.3S79' Fa. an.SSOl
PUBLIC WORKS
(ZOS) &98.5500' F~X 881.1191
BUILDING DliPARTMENT
(20S) SS1.221 L . F.. e81.12~7
PLANNING &. ZONING
(.OS) Sg4-55JJ . Fox 88S-6SS4
CITY COUNCIL MEMBEl'.S
Sh~un Wardle
WjJljam L. M. Nary
Charles M. RO\1nrre.
Keilh Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
&
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GJVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
and the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission wlll hold a Special Joint
Workshop at the Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Watertower, Meridian,
Idaho, on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. The Meridian City Council and
the Meridian Ptanning and Zoning Commission will be discussing the following
items:
Presentation of Meridian Dfi!vslopment Corporation Annual Report
for 2003 FY
DiscusSion of Public Hearing Procedures
Discussion of Presentation Procedures
Discussion of General/Miscellaneous Agenda Item
Discussion of Roles and Responsibilities (City Council, P&Z
Commission, Staff)
,-u kl1 ~ 0 If1J\.J - C't"~ \ h ~l h;- t l t'~L r U\
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - Cf CLE K .
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642. (208) 888.4433
Cu)' Clerk Office Fa.. (208) 888.4218 . HUll1:l1l ResOurces F:\l< (208) 884-8723 . Fin'l1lce & Utility Billing fax (208) 887.4813
ReOs,c,'!=6s+- tor ?Llb)i~ tJ011~y ~~U
I,: ,. ..
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
oW'c;;dltrn
IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888.3579 . Fax 898-550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-l297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-221 t . Fax 887-t297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shaun Wardle
William L. M. Nary
Charles M. Rountree
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
&
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
and the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a Special Joint
Workshop at the Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Watertower, Meridian,
Idaho, on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. The Meridian City Council and
the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will be discussing the following
items:
Presentation of Meridian Development Corporation Annual Report
for 2003 FY
Discussion of Public Hearing Procedures
Discussion of Presentation Procedures
Discussion of General/Miscellaneous Agenda Item
Discussion of Roles and Responsibilities (City Council, P&Z
Commission, Staff)
,.
'.
,11 ilLL:!h Q 1 JlA.- - \I'W h I MI} t l!J\Jl f(j'\
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - Cl CLERK
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE' MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642' (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42[8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility BUlinI!' Fax nmn SUI 'LA II I 'l
?\rD.se ttJst rr PUb\\C- Notle.e:-t! l1l(( It:S\
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
AND
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
JOINT WORKSHOP / SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
TuesdaYt March 30, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Meridian Police Station Conference Room
1401 East Watertowert Meridian,/D
1. Roll-call:
Shaun Wardle
Charlie Rountree
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
David Zaremba
Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Chairman Keith Borup
David Mae
Michael Rohm
2. Introductions:
3. Presentation of Meridian Development Corporation Annual Report for
2003 FY:
4. Discussion of Public Hearing Procedures:
5. Discussion of Presentation Procedures:
6. Discussion of General/Miscellaneous Agenda Item:
7. Discussion of Roles and Responsibilities (City Council, P & Z
Commission, Staff):
Meridian City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission Joint Workshop / Special Meeting Agenda
March 30, 2004 - Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City
Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
(
WHITE PETERSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
KiMN DiNIUs
JUUE KiElN FIsCHER
ClmJsTOPlIERD. GABBERT
WM. F. GlORAY. In
T. GUYHAlLMI **
JILL S. HOID/KA
JOHNR KORMANIK *
WILUAM A MORROW
WILUAM F. N[CIl0LS **
CANYON PARK AT THE IDAHO CENTER
5700 E. fRANKLIN RD., SillTE 200
NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-7901
TEL (208) 466-9272
FAX (208) 466-4405
CHRISTOPHER S. NYE
PIln.Jp A PETERsON
TODD A ROSSMAN
l'ERRENCER. WHIT!! ***
* Also admitted in CA
** Also admitted in OR
*** Also admitted in W A
January 8, 2004
William G. Berg, Jr.
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Ordinance No. 04- , (CHARLES H. AND VICKIEA.
RICHARDSON) Summary of Publication
Dear Will:
Pursuant to the direction of the Meridian City Council, this office has prepared a
summarization of the ordinance providing for an annexation and zoning ordinance for Charles Hand
Vickie A Richardson, pursuant to the City's action. I do hereby advise the City, and make this
statement, that said summary is true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public of the
provisions of said ordinance.
You are hereby directed to file this statement with the ordinance, pursuant to the
provisions ofIdaho Code 9 50-901(A).
Enclosure
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360MlSageland Planned Development AZ-03-015 PP-03..o20 CUP-03-036\Berg Sum Ord Ltr 11 03 03.doc
~
ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO
BOISE IDAHO 03/24/04 11'32 AM
DEPUTY Kalhy Ingraham'
RECORDED-REQUEST OF
Meridian Cily
AMOUNT ,00
6
1111111111/ 11111I111111111" 111I11111
104033486
..........1V.J ---- _ ___
City Clerk Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN
ORDINANCE NO. 04- II) 72----
AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT, CHARLES H. AND VICKlE A. RlCHARDSON, THE OWNERS
OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SOUTH LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND EAST VICTORY ROAD, MERlDIAN, IDAHO, TO BE
KNOWN AS SAGELAND SUBDIVISION AND WHICH LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO
THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERlDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; HAVE
MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRlTING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID
LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERlDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-8); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER
LEGAL DESCRlPTION AS DESCRlBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERlDIAN,
COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS,
ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,
IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERlZ OF THE CITY OF MERlDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED
COpy OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA
COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-223
AND SECTION 63-2215.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERlDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the
City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to
the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owners of said Property, to-wit:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST Y4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. IE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO,
ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-03-015) - 1
AND BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 19,20,29, AND 30
OF 1. 3N., R. IE., B.M.:
THENCE N 00044'50" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 534.95 FEET ALONG THE LINE
COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 19 AND 20, WHICH IS ALSO THE
CENTERLINE OF SOUTH LOCUST GROVE ROAD;
THENCE N 89022' 14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 323.49 FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF THE EIGHT MILE LATERAL;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND
DISTANCES: S 77011 '52" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.60 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS S
77011 '40" E, 523.65);
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT FOR AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 155.25 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 74007'42", AND A LONG CHORD WHICH
BEARS S 40008'01" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 144.65 FEET (SAID CURVE
FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 155.19 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 119.96 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 74007'30");
THENCE S 03004' 10" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 319.40 FEET TO THE LINE
COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 20, AND 29, WHICH IS ALSO THE
CENTERLINE OF EAST VICTORY ROAD;
ANNEXA nON AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-03-0 15) - 2
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF LATERAL N 89034'22" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 951.40 FEET ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS
20, AND 29, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND VICTORY ROAD. CONTAINING A
NET AREA OF 9.80 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby atU1exed and
made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho.
SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian
hereinabove described shall be zoned Medium Density Residential District (R-8).
SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as
the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City
of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the
terms and conditions of that celiain Development Agreement by and between the City of MeridiatI and
/" "";. -
the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the 5' - day of tn~/1- ,2004, and that
the uses me to be developed under the planned unit development process and conditional use permit
process.
SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and atU1ulled.
SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force atId effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication, according to law.
ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-03-015) - 3
SECTION 8: The Clerk ofthe City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the days
following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map
prepared in a draftsman malU1er plainly and cleal"Jy designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian,
including the Jands herein alU1exed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State ofIdaho, to-
wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of
this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with
Idaho Code ~63-2215 and ~50-223.
/) -:7, rd-
PMSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ?--' - day of
L.Lift/lofv. ,2004.
3 ,d..
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this "Z. -- day of
~cfL, ,2004.
.
SEA.L =
~ :::: r;>==
. ~ /(., ~S.,.~ ~;::;
'ft~P,&t:~ ' \"'6 QVllt '''~ .' J.?.:../
CITY CLERK ~ ~ Q"'?' .:;-
" . ? "2.-- /l~ "//III,OoU~rC{ · ~.\",..
First Readmg: ..),r' J.? tJ ~r "i!,; ,."",
Adopted after first reading by suspension ofthe Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-
902 Yes: ~ No:
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
ATTEST:
ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-03-015) - 4
STATE OF IDAHO,)
: ss.
County of Ada )
On this ~3 n' day of f11 t{ rd- ,2004, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known
to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the
within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above,wrif(cW'i~' i ~De~~4'4'
..... .-\.c..L"" f #",
~ ''''' . <.sA ",
.~ \' ,"<l""'~~~ ""./, ,
....'l'eC1 Gti-r~4t..
,~ . ,~~ 04:. .,.,..~\ ~
.. t. h, "'r--
:; :. \:~0.l'<_Ll "'.. ~
k I ~~~ 0 _
.Ir; ^ ' ~ :
: ~ ........ : * ::
... t . .-
.. './J C. ~
':< , UBL\ .. :
~ \J 1.~ ,. ~
. v.. ...." .. ^ ~
...... 'f''t)J "~"Ii..... ~~..~
..##;If OF 10 ~ ~",~
#....h...l".~
(SEAL)
Z:\ Work\M\Mcri dian\Mcrid ian 153 GOM'Sageland Planned Development AZ-03 -015 PP-03-o20 CUP-03-03 6\AZOrd. doc
ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-03-015) - 5
~
2
ro
...J
!:J..f
P5 b ?
"" 0
..... co "" <to
..... c..-.i <t
0 ~
"- N c<') to
"- to $ (})
(J)
-z.
\ll
~ 0">
~ <t
~ ~
~ c<')
-z.
,96'Vt:S
3..0S,WoOON
~\\e
O'd 3f\O'd0 .LSf\()O\ S
~ ~
~ z
~ ~
~-z. ~ 0
.0 ~ ~~C>I
Ow ex: ':::-~
~ - . 0 ~~
&-? -z. - '0
u.1g~~ffi~
()::> ~ ~>9
Z (j) ~ ?gz
4. 0 -z. U- \n~
z ~ 0 0 ~9
_ _ - _'71t.
o ..J b ' 7.~
cc uJ \ll t:: u.l
O~(j)Og
(j) <P
~
\0
~z
02
~~
-$
<fi:C!l
WHITE PETERSON
ATIORNEYS AT LAw
KEVIN E. DINIUS
JULtR KLEIN FISCHRR
CHRISTOPHER D. GNllIERT
WM. F. GIGRAY, III
T. GUYHALLAM**
JILLS. HOLtNKA
JOHN R. KORMANtK~
WILLlMI A. MORROW
WILLIAMF. NICHOLSH
WHITE PETERSON, P.A.
CANYON PARK AT TIIE IDAHO CENTER
5700 E. FRANKLIN RD., SUITE 200
NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-7901
TEL (208) 466-9272
FAX (208) 466-4405
CHRISTOPHERS. NYE
PHlLlP A. PETERSON
TODDA. ROSSMAN
TERRENCER. WHITEH*
* Also admitted in CA
H Also admitted in OR .
*H Also admitted in W A
April 16, 2004
RE(JEIVED
APR 1 9 2004
William G. Berg, Jr.
City Clerk
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Re:
PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC. I SILVERSTONE CAMPUS
SUBDIVISION I FINAL PLAT - (FP-04-016)
Dear Will:
Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the
Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of
Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
Wm. F. Nichols
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M'Silverstone Campus Sub FP-04-01 6\ClerkFPltr 04 16 04.do::
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C 03/23/04
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF PINNACLE )
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR )
APPROVAL OF 35 COMMERCIAL )
BUILDING LOTS AND 4 COMMON )
LOTS ON 80.51 ACRES IN A C-G )
ZONE FOR SILVERSTONE )
CAMPUS SUBDIVISION, )
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1;4 )
MILE EAST OF S. EAGLE ROAD )
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF )
OVERLAND ROAD, MERIDIAN, )
IDAHO )
)
CASE NO. FP-04-016
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code 9 12-3-7 on March 23, 2004, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Brad Hawkins-Clark for the Planning and Zoning Department, and
Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, dated: City Council Date: March 23, 2004, to the
Mayor and Council, and that Anna Powell Planning Director for the Planning and Zoning
Department, Brad Watson of the Public Works Department, and David McKinnon, commented
at the hearing, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the
Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-0 16)
Page 1 of5
1. The Final Plat of "FINAL PLAT SHOWING SILVERSTONE CAMPUS
SUBDIVISION, A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE El/2 OF THE NWl/4 OF
SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2004, DRAWING NO. C036101_FP.DWG, SHEET 1
OF 5, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10 MARCH 04, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", Sundance
Investments Limited Partnership, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those
conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council
from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Brad Hawkins-Clark for the Planning
and Zoning Department, dated: City Council Date: March 23, 2004, listing 22 CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL - FINAL PLAT, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A", and consisting of five pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the applicant's
representative at the March 23, 2004 meeting, David McKinnon, stated on record, and pertaining
to the Staff Report that "they would be making the changes as requested by staff', and he also
stated that "We will make those red lined corrections as requested", and the additional
requirements from the action ofthe Council taken at their March 23, 2004 meeting as follows, to-
wit:
1. Adopt the Recommendations of the Parks and Recreation
Department as follows:
1. A 10 foot wide pathway shall be constructed adj acent to the
south side of the Eight Mile Drain according to pathway
standards.
1.2 Adopt the action ofthe City Council taken at their March 23, 2004
meeting, and specifically pertaining to the Staff Report, under
Conditions of Approval - Final Plat, numbers 11 and 21, such that
they now read as follows:
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-016)
Page 2 of5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-FINAL PLAT
11. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be
via extensions from existing mains. Applicant will be
responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and
through this proposed development (including Copper Point
Way - water only, and Overland Road -water and sewer.)
Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing
with the Public Works Department. (per City Council meeting
March 23, 2004.)
21. There are numerous drafting issues on the fmal plat map as
submitted. The Public Works Department has transmitted a
redline markup of the issues to Pinnacle Engineers for
corrections. These issues shall be satisfied prior to signature on
the final plat by the City Engineer. (per City Council meeting
March 23, 2004.)
1.3 Additional clarification from the City Council March 23, 2004
meeting from the applicant's representative:
1. The applicant has met with the Commuter Ride people
about the bus stop, and it has been agreed upon between the
two parties that the bus stop shall be incorporated into the
additional amenity of the centrally located open
picnic/sheltered area, and which is the triangular property
within the project.
2. Three letters should have been received into record and all
three should have been placed on file in the City Clerk's office.
One letter pertains to an agreement that is in place from
Sutherland to work with the applicant on the completion of the
road.
Another letter is from the adjacent property owner to the east,
Mr. Bienapfl, and which letter says that Mr. Bienapfl has no
issues, except the ditch he believes is not the Eight Mile.
The third letter was not addressed at the meeting.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-0 16)
Page 3 of5
3. Landscape Plan submitted dated 3-12-4, and stamped:
RECEIVED MAR 15 2004 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY
CLERK. OFFICE, is hereby approved.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature ofthe
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be
signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued
guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner
may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with
the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter
at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a
Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an
interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT I (FP-04-016)
Page 4 of5
eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by
Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
2 :J j-L
day of
1?1fi/L~
, 2004.
Attest:
By: ,ju (l Jko..1f'v\....J
Dated:-.1- 2l.\ {)4
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 1 5360M'Silverstone Campus Sub FP-Q4-{)16\OrderFP.doc
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-016)
Page 5 of 5
!
/:
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
~U /CITYOF ~.
VVlerldian
IDAHO
~-"
't,
];,';1( '{,
V
rV
jj'
p
,
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 ,Fax 466-4405
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533' FAX 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
William L.M. Nary
Shaun Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
ijlNC€
. ,tsna
STAFF REPORT:
City Council Date: March 23, 2004
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Brad Hawkins-Clark, Principal City Planner ~\l.~
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~
Silverstone Campus Subdivision
From:
Re:
· Final Plat Approval of Thirty-five (35) Commercial Building Lots and Four
(4) Common Lots on 80.51 Acres in a C-G Zone, by Pinnacle Engineers (File
No. FP-04-016).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & BACKGROUND
The applicant, Pinnacle Engineers, has applied for Final Plat approval of Silverstone Campus
Subdivision, a thirty-nine (39) lot commercial subdivision on 80.51 acres of land, located
approximately'l'4 mile east of S. Eagle Road on the south side of Overland Road. The
preliminary plat (PP-03-018) was approved on 09/23/03 and a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development (CUP-03-044) was approved on 11/25/03, which allowed for a broad
mix of uses and included three (3) different site plan options. The CUP/PD requires the
developer to construct a multi-use pathway along the Eight Mile Drain and at least one (1)
other amenity within the subdivision. (See the" Special Consideration" discussion below.)
On February 19, 2004, Mayor De Weerd, Councilman Nary and several City staff met with
the applicant and other representatives of the subdivision developer, Sundance Company. The
purpose of the meeting was to discuss modifications to the approved preliminary plat in order
to accommodate the CitiGroup call center facility on Lot 1, Block 6. (A height variance was
approved by City Council for this lot on February 24, 2004.) There was general consensus at
this meeting that extending Copper Point Way along the south boundary (shared with
Sutherland Farm Subdivision) and shifting the location of the Pewter Falls St. stub street to
Exhibit "A" 1 of 5
the east (Bienapfl parcel) were modifications that could be supported without submitting a new
preliminary plat. There was also discussion about altering the alignment of S. Jade Way south
of Overland Road. The subject plat substantially reflects modifications that were agreed upon
at the 2/19/04 meeting.
Below is a summary of the proposed modifications to the approved preliminary plat:
No. of Buildin Lots
No. of Common Lots
& Total Acreage
A roved Preliminar Plat
48
6
(8.05 acres req.)
Pro osed Final Plat
35
3 *
(approx. 7.20 acres)
Copper Point Way
Ali ment
Knapp Ave. Alignment
Straight, east-west, approx. 300 '
north of the south bounda
A north-south, half-street section,
approx. 300' long
(Removed the two, 125-foot long
landscape medians at the
Overland Rd. entrance and two
other lots adjacent to the Eight
Mile athwa .)
Jogs south and extends east on
the south bounda
Removed
(in lieu of Copper Point Way
modification
A new "T" intersection was
added approx. 400' south of
Overland Rd.
S. Jade Way
Alignment
Straight, north-south, intersecting
with Copper Point Way
*Note: The application states there are four (4) common lots. However, only three (3)
common lots are depicted on the final plat.
There are two main modifications which impact adjacent properties: the Copper Point Way
alignment and the Knapp Ave. alignment. Both Bienapfl (to east) and Sutherland Farm, Inc.
(to south) have submitted written statements that they approve of the proposed modifications.
However the developer of Sutherland Farm delivered a follow-up letter that conveyed their
disapproval of the proposed utility stubs in Copper Point Way.
Staff recommends approval of Silverstone Campus Subdivision with the comments and
conditions stated in this report.
LOCATION
The property is located on the south side of Overland Road, approximately a 14 mile east of
Eagle Road. The property extends south to the half mile between Overland and Victory Roads
The subject property is designated as "Mixed Use- Regional" in the Future Land Use Map of the
2002 Comprehensive Plan.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Exhibit "A" 2 of 5
North - Jewell Subdivision, zoned R-I (Ada Co.)
South - Future commercial lots within Sutherland Farm Subdivision, zoned C-G (preliminary
plat approved July 2002)
East - Rural residential and agricultural land, zoned RUT (Ada Co.); future Medium Density
Residential on Meridian's Future Land Use Map
West - Silverstone Corporate Center, zoned C-G
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
The Silverstone Business Campus CUP/PD application (condition #6, pg. 20) requires
Sundance Company to provide either ten percent (10%) of the gross land area as open space
or another amenity "to be approved by the P&Z Commission and City Council" (this is in
addition to the multi-use pathway). The final plat does not designate the 10 % open space (8.05
ac.) as one of the two amenities and, therefore, a second amenity will be required. The
Landscape Plan (Sheet L-3) shows a picnic shelter on Lot 14, Block 2 as the second amenity.
While this amenity issue is technically a condition of fIle CUP-03-044, it impacts the final plat
design because of the common lot area and configurations.
The City Council will need to review and approve the picnic shelter as an acceptable second
amenity before approving the final plat. If more usable open space is desired, the final plat
will need to be amended.
CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL - FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved Preliminary Plat (PP-03-018),
Conditional Use Permit (CUP-03-044), and Development Agreement pertaining to this
development.
2. Applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is
to remain private. The applicant shall be required to provide a backup source to the
pressurized irrigation system. Plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be
reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review
process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be
submitted prior to plan approval.
3. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, and road base
approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits.
One building permit may be issued within the subdivision prior to these improvements
being approved. All development improvements (including the public pathway within
Lot 3, Block I and Lot 14, Block 2), irrigation, and landscaping shall be installed and
approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in
the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation,
sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat.
The public pathway within Lot 15 and 16, Block 2 and Lot 8, Block 3 shall be
constructed prior to issuance of the tenth building permit within the subdivision.
Exhibit "A" 3 of 5
4. The Landscape Plan, dated 3-11-04 (Sheets L-1 thru L-3), prepared by The Land Group,
needs to be revised as follows:
a. If ACHD requires a maintenance access road to serve Lot 13, Block 2, please
show the road on Sheet L-2 and its relationship to any proposed trees.
b. Per MCC 12-13-12-9, amend Sheet L-2 to show at least one tree per thirty-five
(35) lineal feet of distance adjacent to the pathway along the Eight Mile Drain.
c. Design the slopes of the ACHD stormwater detention pond at no less than 3: 1.
Please submit three (3) revised plans to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to
signature on the final plat.
5. Prior to the City Engineer signature on the final plat, submit a written statement from the
U.S. Corps of Engineers that the wetlands area adjacent to the west boundary of the
subdivision is in full compliance with their wetland mitigation requirements.
6. The subdivision entrance sign shown on Sheet L-3 of the Landscape Plan is not
approved with this application. Separate commercial sign permit applications, prepared
in accordance with MCC 11-14, shall be submitted prior to any permanent signs being
constructed within the subdivision.
7. Prior to issuance of the second building permit within the subdivision, the developer
shall comply with condition #5 (pg. 6) of File #PP-03-018 regarding the recording of a
public pedestrian easement for the pathway. Unless the entire pathway is located within
a separate common lot, a metes and bounds description of the pathway, prepared by a
licensed land surveyor, shall be submitted by the applicant for inclusion with the
pathway easement being prepared by the City Attorney. Said legal description shall be
recorded with the pathway easement.
8. Amend the Certificate of Owners information on the signature sheet to provide the
correct property owner, parcel data, and accurate boundary description.
9. Amend Note #10 on Sheet 3 to delete Lot 3, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 5 and Lot 1, Block 6
as common lots within the subdivision. Also, correct Lot 12, Block 2 to be Lot 13, Block
2.
10. Amend Note #14 on Sheet 3 to add Lot 14, Block 2 and change Lot 17, Block 2 to be
Lot lQ, Block 2.
11. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from
existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to
and through this proposed development (including Copper Point Way - water only, and
Overland Road -water and sewer.) Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and
routing with the Public Works Department. (Per City Council meeting March 23,2004.)
12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
Exhibit "A" 4 of 5
13. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water
will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms
up to and including a 1 DO-year storm event. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not
exceed 3:1.
14. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways (including the
waterway bisecting Silverstone Campus Subdivision), intersecting, crossing or lying
adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance
12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation! drainage district,
or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the
Public Works Department.
15. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
16. Two-hundred-fifty watt (250w), high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed
at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by
Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the
Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
17. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Deparhnent for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
18. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying
that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the
highest established normal groundwater elevation.
19. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian1s Water Deputy Fire Chief
and the Public Works Department.
20. Provide sidewalks in accordance with MCC 12-13-10-8.
21. There are numerous drafting issues on the final plat map as submitted. The Public
Works Department has transmitted a redline markup of the issues to Pinnacle Engineers
for corrections. These issues shall be satisfied prior to signature on the final plat by the
City Engineer. (Per City Council meeting March 23, 2004.)
22. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary
plat, conditional use permit or development agreement does not relieve Applicant of
responsibility for compliance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat, with the above stated comments and conditions.
Exhibit "A" 5 of 5
WiII Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Pauline Skeggs
Tuesday. March 23, 20044:24 PM
Will Berg (bergw@meridiancity.org); Anna Powell (powella@meridiancity.org); Bill Musser
(musserb@meridiancity.org); Doug Strong (strongd@meridiancity.org); Gary Smith
(smithg@meridiancity.org); John Shawcroft (shawcroj@meridiancity.org); Kenny Bowers
(bowersk@meridiancity.org); Rick Clinton (clintonr@meridiancity.org); Stacy Kilchenmann
(kilchens@meridiancity.org); Tammy deWeerd (deweerdt@meridiancity.org)
FW: The Explorer - 3/15/04 - March Madness is Back
Subject:
Thought I would pass this on.
Pauline Skeggs
Human Resources
skeggsp@meridiancity.org
-----Original Message-----
From: lEC Compliance (mailto:Compliance@iecgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 5:04 PM
To: IEC Compliance
Subject: The Explorer - 3/15/04 March Madness is Back
The IEC Group Explorer, Monday, March 15, 2004
March Madness is Back and So Are Workplace Betting Pools
HR Tip: Conduct and Ethics
By, Kara Blumberg, SPHR, Compliance Consultant
The NCAA tournament is underway and once again employee betting pools are
rampant in corporate America. Employers are oftentimes surprised to learn
that such betting schemes are actually illegal. Gambling results in income,
which the IRS considers both reportable and taxable. The IRS estimates that
nearly $3 billion in illegal betting is generated by March Madness each
year. In addition to small-scale office pools, online gambling sites provide
easy access to betting pools. Major studies on workplace gambling have shown
that the highest levels of Internet traffic at gambling sites occurs between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., while your employees are at work.
Organizing or participating in office betting pools is prohibited in almost
every state. Involvement in such pools is a misdemeanor punishable by up to
one year in jail. Additionally, the owner of the premises where such a pool
is conducted is subject to the same criminal liability as the pool
organizers and participants, regardless of their involvement or knowledge of
such activities. Although local authorities are not likely to spend a great
deal of resources probing into workplace betting schemes, it is good
business practice to prohibit such pools at your facility including online
gambling by employees.
This email communication contains human resource suggestions. It is not
legal advice. These materials/products are the confidential and proprietary
work of AmeriBen/IEC and may not be reproduced without the express written
permission of AmeriBen/IEC, P.O. Box 7186, Boise, ID 83707.
Human Resource Services: 8S8-TEC-8S11
Compliance Hotline: 888-716-4482
http://www.iecgroup.com/
1
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. ~ 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 04~ /01 z..
PROVIDING FOR AN ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation and zoning for land owned by
Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson, to be known as Sageland Subdivision, consisting
of9.8 acres and commonly located at the northeast corner of South Locust Grove Road
and East Victory Road, Meridian, Idaho, with a zoning designation ofR-8 Medium
Density Residential; and providing for effect of invalidity; providing that all ordinances
and resolutions in conflict are repealed and rescinded; and providing an effective date.
Legal Description
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST Y4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R IE., RM., ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO,
AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 19,20,29,
AND 30 OF T. 3N., R. IE., B.M.:
THENCE N 00044'50" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 534.95 FEET ALONG
THE LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 19 AND 20, WHICH IS
ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH LOCUST GROVE ROAD;
THENCE N 89022' 14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 323.49 FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF THE EIGHT MILE LATERAL;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES
AND DISTANCES: S 77011 '52" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.60 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (FORMERLY
DESCRIBED AS S 77011 '40" E, 523.65);
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT
FORAN ARC DISTANCE OF 155.25 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 74007'42", AND
A LONG CHORD WHICH BEARS S 40008'01" E FOR A DISTANCE
OF 144.65 FEET (SAID CURVE FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS
HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 155.19 FEET, A RADIUS OF 119.96
FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 74007'30");
THENCE S 03004'10" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 319.40 FEET TO THE
LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 20, AND 29, WHICH IS ALSO
THE CENTERLINE OF EAST VICTORY ROAD;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF LATERAL N 89034'22"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 951.40 FEET ALONG THE LINE COMMON
TO SAID SECTIONS 20, AND 29, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT-OF- WAY OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD
AND VICTORY ROAD. CONTAINING A NET AREA OF 9.80
ACRES MORE OR LESS.
A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of
Meridian, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the
2'5~ day of 111tVtclv , 200~\l11I1l1/J111
\\\\ . 11//
~\\\f Of MEJr~ 111//
~' :'\' ~ /~
$' (} ~OF4 -11; ~
~ icP I<c:: -;:.
::: ~ ()-::.
- -
- -
~ =
City of Meridian L
Mayor. m:d City Council. ~ 7~ ....R I
By: WIlham G. Berg, Jr., CIty Clerk ~",o ~r lS'1 . ,{?.$
First Reading: -3 -- Z- '5 ~ 0 I- ~~ ~ a ~tr' "........
. . /,,1. OUN;'['{ , ,\,....
Adopted after first readmg by suspenSIOn of/th1=;rJ}(NR;M\-aitOwed pursuant to Idaho Code
50-902: YES)G NO t
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\SageJand Planned Development AZ-03-015 PP.03-020 CUP-03-
036\SUMANNEXZONGORD.doc
CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and
The State Tax Commission of the State ofIdaho
1, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of
Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of O~inance No. 04- / t? "12.. , passed by the
City Council of the City of Meridian, on the 2-'3 - day of httf/Lcl'iJ ,2004, is a true and
correct copy of the original of said document which is in the care, custody and control of the ritv
,\1\111t1rJ/1,(
Clerk of the City of Meridian, ,'\\\\'Of MED/"IIII
~'\ oJ 'It'b, II/.
:-.; :.\' "'4 ;',1
.f' (} ~Of4 -'1,.> ~
~ cP r~ ~
~ ~ 0::.
91.... :;:.
~ =
I. =::
- ~
J1dL-:~/J
WILLIAM G, BERG, JR.
-
-
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss.
COlUIty of Ada, )
On this ,,-1. day of 1!1 arch , in the year ;200cj, before me,
v.J c.~ L. S.......t+L... , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM
G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that
executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the
C' fM 'd' ."I"IIM",
Ity 0 en Jan. ....... CE L ""
~..'Ii j\. \. . S .L~<r<r<r
,," ...,. ......... "...,.;. <:.
:: ') " .. ~ ~ <#
','" e..,.., ~
.\. · OT · ~ ..
::: · 1\ .41> " ..
::; * : '4"{~ ~ :
: Z "0-. : :
': '&..0 :*E
(SEAL) \ tP,.\" l1BL Ie l i
~..... .. ,,, / I
*.o~ "'1 )>;..........~ 0 ....~ "r /;;u; / tJ 7
~<r#.., Op 11> l'o.,.......... 7 ~
"''''11..'111
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360M\Sageland Planned Development AZ-03.0 [5 PP-D3-020 CUP-03-036\CertificationOtClerkOrd.doc
CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
AZ-03-015
WHITE PETERSON
ATIORNEYS AT LAw
KEVIN E. DINIUS
JULIE KLEIN FISCHER
CHRISTOPHER D. GABBERT
WM. F. GIGAAY, HI
T. GUY HALLAM **
JILL S. HOLINR,\
JOHN R. KORMANIK *
WILLIAM A. MORROW
WILLIAM F. NICHOLS H
WHITE PETERSON, P.A.
CANYON P ARKATTHE IDAHO CENTER
5700 E. FRANKLIN RD., SUITE 200
NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-7901
TEL (208) 466-9272
FAX (208) 466-4405
CHRISTOPHERS. NYE
PHILIP A. PETERSON
TODD A. ROSSMAN
TERRENCER. WHITE nO'
* Also admitted in CA
H Also admitted in OR
n* Also admitted in WA
April 16, 2004
'RR
. "J~
'T":"l IT rir.'l
D~ \j ~
APR 1 6 2004
William G. Berg, Jr.
City Clerk
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Re:
HILL VIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION / CHAMPION
PARK SUBDIVISION NO.2 / FINAL PLAT - (FP-04-015)
Dear Will:
Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the
Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of
Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Z:\Work\M\MeridiBn\Meridian I 5360M'Champion Park Sub NO.2 FP-04-O1 5\ClerkFPltr 04 16 04.do:.:
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF HILLVIEW )
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION )
FOR APPROVAL OF 75 SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENITAL BULIDING )
LOTS AND 11 COMMON LOTS ON )
22.16 ACRE IN AN R-8 ZONE FOR )
CHAMPION PARK SUBDIVISION )
NO. 2, LOCATED )
APPROXIMA TEL Y Y2 MILE WEST )
OF N. EAGLE ROAD AND )
APPROXIMATELY 'i4 MILE )
NORTH OF E. USTICK ROAD, IN )
THE SOUTH 1Iz OF SECTION 32, )
TAN., R.1E., MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
HILL VIEW DEVELOPMENT )
CORP. )
APPLICANT. )
)
)
C/C 03/23/04
CASE NO. FP-04-015
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code ~ 12-3-7 on March 23, 2004, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen for the Planning and Zoning Dep"artment, and Bruce
Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, dated: Hearing Date: April 6, 2004, to the Mayor and
Council, and that Anna Powell Planning Director for the Planning and Zoning Department,
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-0 15)
Page 1 of4
commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the requirements of the
preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING CHAMPION PARK SUBDIVISION NO.2,
LOCATED IN THE S1I2 OF SECTION 32, TAN., R.IE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO 2004, ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC, BOISE, IDAHO, 03-034-00, SHEET 1
OF 4, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 2-26-2004, J:
\CHAMPION PARK2 03034\DRA WINGS\OO CHAMP PARK2 PLAT.dwg 2/2612004",
-."...,. - -.-. -
Hillview Development Corporation, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those
conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council
from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Sonya Allen for the Planning and Zoning
Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 6, 2004, listing 21 CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL, a
true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four
pages, and by tins reference incorporated herein, and a response letter from Engineering
Solutions dated March 19, 2004, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked
Exhibit "B", and consisting oftwo pages, and by this reference incorporated herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature ofthe
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be
signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT I (FP-04-0 15)
Page 2 of 4
guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY T AKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner
may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with
the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter
at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a
Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an
interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-
eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by
Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
:z '3 reL
day of
In tl/LClv
,2004.
By:
\\\1\\11111111" Tamm
\\\\ ,..c M f"1
",\ -' v' EJ::;;O/ II1>;::!ayor,
x- ..(~ IJf '/
Attest: ~... (j'_",.DO -1;z" ....~
.... .dJ' ~ -1t1 ~ --
..... ~ t~.. ,/'
;) 2 ~ 0 s
~&Lh....(P:-~ SEAL" ~
William G. Berg, ft.: C~ Clerk ~ "'~h" ,~\j C' jj
~..,o ~'SJ lSi ' / ;'A.J .$
~ ..tV '/ -~,?~\~ ~ ,~
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROvi[;g~~A.1 p~At'~ (FP-04-015)
Page) of 4
Copy served upon Applicant, the Plmming and Zoning Department, Public Works Department,
and City Attorney.
By:~JtI\LJv;
Dated: 4- Zq ~ 04
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Mcridian I 5360M'Champion Park Sub No.2 FP-04-Q15\OrderFP.doc
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROY AL OF FINAL PLAT / (FP-04-015)
Page 4 of4
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
cMe;;didtl
IDAHO
CITY HALL
(208) 8884433 - Fax 887-4813
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 898-9551
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
William L.M. Nary
Shaun Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Sonya Allen, Planner I JIl ~
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech. ~
Hearing Date: April 6, 2004
'R" . lr.1 ",., J'"" -;:;-Y r. ><.--"1 -.._,
- \ J-11 9 , J"{: I ~t ~'i : 1..' ~
~ I _--.ill \.J L ..< ,,< v ,;1.. .", J'.
STAFF REPORT:
~I!AD .1.. "{'lO'
IV! h ~ t; ~:tJ~ t}
From:
City OfMeridiml
Clty Clerk OOlee
Re:
Champion Park Subdivision No.2
. Request for Final Plat Approval of Seventy-five (75) Single-Family
Residential Lots and Eleven (11) Common Lots on 22.16 Acres in an R-8
Zone for Champion Park Subdivision No.2, by Hillview Development
Corporation (File No. FP-04-015).
We have reviewed the above-referenced submittal and offer the foUowing comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICA TION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Hillview Development Corporation, has requested final plat approval of the
second phase of Champion Park Subdivision (preliminary platted under the name Parkstone
Subdivision). This phase of the subdivision consists of 75 single-family residential lots and 11
common lots on 22.16 acres and is located approximately ~ mile west of N. Eagle Road and
approximately 14 mile north ofE. Ustick Road, in the south ~ of Section 32, TAN., R.IE. The
gross density ofthe subdivision is 3.38 d./u. per acre. The net density is 4.53 d./u. per acre.
Although the proposed subdivision is located in an R-8 zone, a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development (File No. CUP-02-049) has been approved for the subdivision that allows
a portion of the subdivision to be developed in a commercial manner. The CUP also allowed for
reductions to the front & side setbacks, min. lot size, min. street frontage, min. house size, and
allowance for block lengths to exceed 1,OOO-feet.
Staff recommends that the Council not require the applicant to complete condition No. 2.A.7.
from the Preliminary Plat Findings. The condition requires that the applicant construct a
micropath between Lots 48 and 49, Block 12 as shown on the preliminary plat. As a result of
~: b;t ,,^II I fJ-9-c1
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: April 6, 2004
Page 2 of4
discussion at the City Council public hearing, this requirement should have been removed as
there is not a connection to Setter Cove Subdivision to the west. Staff has removed this
requirement as a condition of approval.
Staff finds that the proposed final plat substantially complies with the approved Preliminary
Plat. An additional common area lot (Lot 14) to be used for drainage was added to Block 17. No
building lots were lost due to this change.
Staff recommends approval of the second phase of Champion Park Subdivision with the
comments and conditions stated in this report.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
L Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved Preliminary Plat (pP-02-033), Planned
Development (CUP-02-049), and Development Agreement (lust. No. 103085229).
2. The pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and
maintained by the Home Owner's Association. The City of Meridian requires that
pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. Ifa creek or
well source is not available, a single-point connection to the municipal water system
shall be required. Plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by
the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process, and a
draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to
plan approval. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible
for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat
by the Meridian City Engineer.
3 - Sanitary sewer and water service to these lots shall be via main line extensions from
existing mains adjacent to the subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct the
sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them
available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and
routing with the Public Works Department
4. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determin.ed during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
5. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water
will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms
up to and including a 100-year storm event (All areas being counted toward the 10%
open space amenity shall be free of "wet ponds" or other such nuisances.).
6. Add or revise the following plat notes:
FP-04-015
:6;f
~r~;'Stlf
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: April 6, 2004
Page 3 of4
a. Revise note No. 8 to read: "Building setbacks and dimensional standards in this
subdivision shall be in compliance with Title 11 and Title 12 of the Meridian
City Code unless otherwise modified by Conditional Use Permit (CUP-02~049).
b. Revise note No. 13 to include Instrument NO.1 03085229.
c. Revise note No. 11 to read: "All single family detached units within this
subdivision shall have a minimum square footage of 1,200 square feet, exclusive
of garages. This shall exclude lots adiacent to the western and northern property
lines which shall be a minimum of 1.500 S.L for a single story and 1.800 S.L for a
two story building." (per Preliminary Plat Finding No. 13.A2.)
7. The Landscape Plan dated 3-1-04, prepared by Harvest Design, 1S approved as
submitted.
8. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed
from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9~1~4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be
used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
9. Street lights shall be installed in compliance with the approved streetlight agreement.
One-Hundred watt (lOOw), high~pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. Ail streetlights shall be installed
at subdivider1s expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by
Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the
Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
10. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
11. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying
that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the
highest established normal groundwater elevation.
12. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Deputy Fire Chief
and the Public Works Department.
13. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC 12-
13-10-8.
14. A new detailed Conditional Use Permit will be required prior to development of any of
the commercial, office or mini-storage lots within the Champion Park Subdivision.
15. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
FP..Q4..0] 5
~ 6:4 UIf'ilJOfVdOC
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: April 6, 2004
Page4of4
16. Fencing shall be installed as submitted on fencing plan in accordance with MCC 12-4-
10.
17. Graphically depict a 5-foot wide public utilities, drainage and irrigation easement along
the east side of Lot 18, Block 17, Lot 18, Block 16, and Lot 32, Block 15 as these will be
side lot line adjacent to a future phase.
18. Graphically depict a 13-foot wide public utilities, drainage and irrigation easement along
the north side of Lot 25, Block 15. The extra width is required due to a pressure
irrigation main.
19. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed,
off-site pathway constructed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway
District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements,
including fencing, micro-paths, off-site pathway, irrigation, and landscaping shall be
installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or
cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping,
pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat.
20. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confinnation of said
approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
21. Staff" s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary
plat, conditional use permit or development agreement does not relieve Applicant of
responsibility for compliance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat, with the above stated comments and conditions.
FP..{)4.{) 15
~ -~~o -_"&'""-,"",&,'-1"3
cut:! 938 0941
p. 1
,:..
I~J~~ C Fj IVl~J r
MAR 2 2 2004
. ENI!l~!i!!!l!.~
'SOLUTIONSup
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
J 50 East Aikens Street, Suite B
Eagle~ ID 83616
Phone: (208) 938-098V
Fax: (208) 938-0941
E-mail: es-beckym@qwestnet
March 19, 2004
Mayor and City Council
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
!
Re: Champion Park SubdiYision No.2 (Final Plat) ~
File No. FP...04~015 :
Dear Mayor and Council:
We have reviewed staff comments for the hearing date of .f\.pril 6, 2004, and have the following
responses: ; .
SITE SPECIFIC REOUIREMENTS
1. The applicant will meet all tenn.s of the approved preliminary plat (pP-02-033), ,..
conditional use permit (CUP-02-049) and deveIop-tnent agreement (Inst. No.1 03085229).
2. The applicant will comply.
3. The applicant will comply_
4. The applicant will comply.
5. The applicant will comply.
6. The notes will be changed as requested.
I
7. It is noted that the landscape plan is approved as sfwmitted.
8. The applicant will comply.
9. The applicant will comply.
10. The applicant will cOll'!-ply.
11. The applicant will comply.
8J.;b.I"!/' lof:L
MAR 22 '04 15:24
<D-~.-_. .....b ..............y\.J.uns
cUl:l 938 0841
f
i
p.2
I
We believe this letter addresses all of your concerns. Inease .feel free to call me if you have
additional comments or questions.
Sincerely,
Engineering Solutions, LLP
~#~
BM:ss
cc: Mr. Jim Merkle
Ei
MAR 22 '04 15:25
Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Tammy de Weerd
Sent: Saturday, March 06,20044:25 PM
To: Will Berg
Subject: FW: Administrative Assistant to Mayor
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
City of Meridian
www.meridiancity.org
(208) 888-4433 ext. 204
(208) 888-4218 fax
-----Original Message-----
From: Tammy de Weerd [mailto:deweerdt@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 20044:25 PM
To: 'Shaun Wardle (wardles@meridiancity.org)'; 'Bill Nary (naryb@meridlancity.org)'; 'Charles Rountree
(crountre@itd.state.ld.us)'; 'Charles Rountree (rountrec@meridiancity.org)'; 'Keith Bird
(birdronaldkeith@msn.com)'; 'Bill Nary'
Subject: FW: Administrative Assistant to Mayor Ordinance
Please review. I will be adding this to the agenda next week for your consideration. This should bring
the administrative assistant position in line to what it was intended when it was first established. Please
carr if you have any questions.
Tammy
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
City of Meridian
www .meridiilllcity .org
(208) 888-4433 ext. 204
(208) 888-4218 fax
3/16/2004
Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Anna Powell
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 2:24 PM
To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Subject: FW: Star Area of Impact Request
Will,
This should be included in the packet for Tuesday.
Anlla
RJECE'r~JED
MAR 2 2 2004
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Alma Borchers P01ve!l, AICP
City qf MeridiatJ PlaJl1littg Director
-----Orig i nal Message-----
From: Nichoel Baird-Spencer [maUto:nbaird@cityofeagle.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 200411:50 AM
To: powella@meridiancity.org
Cc: rountrec@meridiancity.org; birdk@meridiancity.org; naryb@meridiancity.org; wardles@meridiancity.erg;
deweerdt@meridiancity.org; nmerril04@msn.com; sbastian@sd131.k12.id.us; 'Lynne'; dsguerber@msn.com;
snordstrom@avcraft.com
Subject: Star Area of Impact Request
Anna,
Thanks for taking the time to talk with me this morning. After our discussIon the City of Eagle would like to
request that the City of Meridian not voice support or opposition to the City of Star's AOI request.
The City of Eagle is in the beginning stages of reviewing our ADI and will over the next 2 weeks be holding three
(3) community visioning session with the citizens and land owners between Eagle Road and Highway 16 to
discuss the future land use patterns in this area. Further, at the request ofthe Board of Ada County
Commissioners, the Star and Eagle City Councils will be meeting on March 29th to discuss the area between the
two cities to give the county some guidance on future AOI boundaries.
The City of Eagle respectfully requests that the City of Meridian allow Eagle and Star to work with together to see
if we can come to an agreement on the future AOI boundaries before you lend support to either effort.
Sincerely,
Nichoel Baird Spencer, AICP
Planner III
City of Eagle
Cc: Mayor Merrill
Mayor DeWeerd
Eagle City Council
Meridian City Council
3/22/2004