HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-02-13 Work Session
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho
Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 4:30 PM
Minutes
ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE
PRESENT
Councilman Doug Taylor
Councilman John Overton
Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts
Councilman Luke Cavener
Councilwoman Liz Strader
ABSENT
Councilman Joe Borton
Mayor Robert E. Simison
ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted
CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved
Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Overton.
Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts,
Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader
1. Final Plat for Slatestone Subdivision No. 1 (FP-2023-0028) by Ardurra, located at
2707 S. Stoddard Rd.
2. Final Plat for Artisan Victory Market (FP-2023-0026, by Judy Schmidt, Bailey
Engineering, located at 2820, 2910, 2960, 2990 and 3020 S. Eagle Rd.
3. Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project Agreement between Smith Brighton Inc., DWT
Investments Inc., SCS Investments LLC and the City of Meridian
4. Approval of Purchase Order 24-0253 with The Public Restroom Company for the
purchase of two (2) prefabricated restrooms for Lakeview Golf Course for the not-
to-exceed amount of $330,542.00
5. Resolution 24-2435: A resolution amending the Meridian Police Department
Records Retention Schedule, authoring the Police Chief and the City Clerk to
implement the schedule, and providing an effective date
ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\]
DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS
6. Urban Renewal District Discussion
7. Union 93 Update
ACTION ITEMS
8. Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the amount of $339,000 for Well 26 Water
Treatment Facility Construction Approved
Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Cavener.
Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts,
Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader
9. Approval of Construction Contract to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the Well 26
Water Treatment Facility project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $2,295,144.00
Approved
Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Cavener.
Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts,
Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader
ADJOURNMENT 5:22 PM
Meridian City Council Work Session February 13, 2024.
A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday,
February 13, 2024, by Vice-President Strader.
Members Present: Liz Strader, Luke Cavener, John Overton, Anne Little Roberts and
Doug Taylor.
Members Absent: Robert Simison and Joe Borton.
ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE
X Liz Strader Joe Borton
_X_Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton
_X_ Doug Taylor _X—Luke Cavener
Mayor Robert E. Simison
Strader: Hi, everybody. We will call this City Council work session to order. For the
record it is Tuesday, February 13th, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this meeting with
roll call attendance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Strader: Thank you. The next item is the adoption of the agenda.
Cavener: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Yes, Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: I've had the chance to review the Consent Agenda and see no changes, so
move that we approve the Consent Agenda as published.
Strader: Councilman Cavener, do you move to adopt the agenda?
Cavener: Sorry. Adopt the agenda as presented. Thank you.
Strader: Fantastic. Excellent. Is there any discussion? All in favor, please, signify by
saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item]
1. Final Plat for Slatestone Subdivision No. 1 (FP-2023-0028) by
Ardurra, located at 2707 S. Stoddard Rd.
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 2 of 18
2. Final Plat for Artisan Victory Market (FP-2023-0026, by Judy Schmidt,
Bailey Engineering, located at 2820, 2910, 2960, 2990 and 3020 S.
Eagle Rd.
3. Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project Agreement between Smith
Brighton Inc., DWT Investments Inc., SCS Investments LLC and the
City of Meridian
4. Approval of Purchase Order 24-0253 with The Public Restroom
Company for the purchase of two (2) prefabricated restrooms for
Lakeview Golf Course for the not-to-exceed amount of $330,542.00
5. Resolution 24-2435: A resolution amending the Meridian Police
Department Records Retention Schedule, authoring the Police Chief
and the City Clerk to implement the schedule, and providing an
effective date
Strader: Onto the Consent Agenda.
Cavener: Madam Vice-President.
Strader: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Now, if it so pleases everyone, I would move that we approve the Consent
Agenda as presented, for the Vice-President to sign and the Clerk to attest.
Overton: Second.
Strader: Excellent. Is there any discussion? All favor of approving the Consent
Agenda, please, signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the
Consent Agenda is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item]
DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS
6. Urban Renewal District Discussion
Strader: With that next up we have our Department/Commission Reports. We will
begin with Item 6, the Urban Renewal District discussion with the legal counsel for MDC
and our Union Urban Renewal District Mr. Todd Lakey. Mr. Lakey, the floor is yours.
Lakey: Thank you, Madam Vice-President and Council Members. Appreciate the
opportunity to be here tonight. I was kind of asked -- for the record Todd Lakey, legal
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 3 of 18
counsel for the Urban Renewal Agency MDC. I was asked to kind of go through Urban
Renewal 101, so to speak, and I will just kind of cover some of the high points and as
we go along, please, feel free to ask questions or whatever. I don't have to be a talking
head the whole time. I can do that. Lawyers do that. But don't feel like I have to.
would prefer not to. So, Chris, thanks for getting the slides up. Do I hit up or down or
do you take --
Johnson: The right arrow. Left arrow.
Lakey: Right arrow. Okay. Okay. Great. Okay. So, urban renewal law is contained in
two places in Title 50. Same chapter as -- or same title as city law, but it's Chapters 20
and 29. One deals a little bit more with financing and one deals a little more with
functionality. So, I will just kind of start with the basics. In Title 50 urban renewal
traditionally has been about infrastructure and upgrading infrastructure, replacing
infrastructure. So, sewer, water extensions, roads, sidewalks, all of that. And, then,
traditionally it's also been a tool for removal of blight and decay. So, rundown buildings,
rundown properties, again, defective infrastructure and all of that to help promote
development or redevelopment of property within the city and that's kind of the historic
use of it, the historic perspective and that's -- it's also been updated over time. So, the
urban renewal agency has some provisions that also help promote development --
economic development and encourage private enterprise. That's one of the goals of
this. So, if you kind of think of it, the old downtown, that's the original urban renewal
district for the City of Meridian and it's a little bit more of the older school type, more
broad, and Ten Mile is kind of a newer type and I will talk about the differences. But Ten
Mile certainly was more of an urban renewal economic development type project that
was focused on by the city and that's caused a little bit of contention and confusion.
Some people say, well, it says blight removal, it says decay, that means not -- or that
doesn't mean economic development, that means sewer, water, those kinds of things
and -- and less about Ten Mile and more about downtown. But it does have both and
that generates some discussion and review. There is -- there is some legislation that
seems like it's always percolating in the capitol regarding that and that's part of that
discussion. But as currently written it does let you do both and economic development I
would say is kind of a secondary purpose in the code as it's listed, but it is appropriate
and some of the things you look at from an economic development context are things
like obsolete platting or diversity of ownership such that you can't really coordinate
things and have a unified project or development. Deterioration of structure and
improvements. But economic under development. That's another criteria that you can
consider. And when I say consider, I mean you as the City Council, because you are
the ones that form new districts and generate that and, then, turn that over to the
agency once it's established. An area that is -- that substantially arrests sound growth
and development of the municipality. So, those are some of the criteria that you can
use in an economic development context as a city. The code does call out encouraging
private enterprise to the maximum extent. So, that's really what urban renewal is
supposed to be about, generating redevelopment that helps increase the tax base, so at
the end of the day when the urban renewal agency goes away you have an enhanced
tax base and that increment goes back to the taxing districts, the cities and -- and other
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 4 of 18
taxing districts that are within the boundaries. I will talk a little -- more a little bit about it
as we get further, but you have two concepts to remember, you have an urban renewal
agency, which is the overall umbrella and, then, underneath that you have urban
renewal districts or tax increment districts that generate increment funding. Originally
the downtown district and the agency were kind of all the same thing and it's easy to
look at them as the same thing, but now you have multiple districts that you have
formed under the umbrella of the agency, which can potentially cover the whole city if
you decide to establish new districts. I went the wrong way. Okay. As I said, the city
kind of drives it. Initially you establish the agency, you establish new districts as we go
along. The Mayor appoints, nominates members to fill vacancies on the board and,
then, the Council approves those. So, it's with the advice and consent of Council.
Some of the specifics about the city -- the City Council cannot have a majority on the
urban renewal agency board and they are supposed to be independent entities and I
will talk a little bit more about the reasons legally for that later. But you can remove an
urban renewal commissioner if they engage in inefficiency, neglect or misconduct. But
you can't just go say, all, right, Dave Winder, thanks, kind of had enough you. Bye. You
have to have basically for cause to remove a commissioner. I have never seen that
happen in 15 years, but it's possible. The Council used to be able to replace the -- the
urban renewal board with itself and I saw that. Actually Eagle did that for a while. The
code was changed, so you can't have a majority, but you can replace the entire board
for a year if you want to, just for a big massive reset versus the -- the appointed
members that you have now. The Council can also decide to make the board elected. I
can't imagine anybody wanting to run for urban renewal commissioner, but I suppose it's
possible, but I haven't really seen that implemented either. The vast majority of them
are appointed and there is a mixture of -- usually I think that's the most effective -- a
mixture of some from the city council and some from the community. So, a little bit
about the legal aspects of it. So, the urban renewal agency is not supposed to be the
alter ego of the city and there has been lawsuits in regard to that. Eastern Idaho, the
Yick Kong case, the urban renewal agency was going to -- I think it was approve bonds
to build -- I can't remember -- it was a road or something and the individual challenged
that saying, no, in Idaho you have to have a vote to incur debt as a local government
entity, but the court said, no, a city and a county, those -- those are local government
entities. An urban renewal agency is not that, it's not a city, therefore, you can incur
debt without a vote, but you have to make sure that they are separate. So, if the -- if the
urban renewal agency creeps more and more to becoming the alternate funding branch
for the city, then, that line starts to blur and there is more of an opportunity for a legal
challenge when the urban renewal agency pursues funding on something. Okay? So,
that's why I say down at the bottom there cooperation with caution. Cities and the urban
renewal agency for that city always cooperate and talk and work together, but have to
be very careful to make sure that they still are separate entities and not just the urban
renewal agency is viewed just another way to build a public building or support city
funding. Okay? Let's see. Next one. So, the powers and responsibilities. Each urban
renewal district has to have a plan and that plan is ultimately adopted by both the
agency and the city and if you look at some of the foundational ordinances you will see
that the -- again, there is a difference here. The old plans, like the plan for the
downtown area is a little broader. It's more like, you know, public infrastructure
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 5 of 18
generally, parks, public art, transportation infrastructure -- it's -- it's kind of broad. If you
look at the Ten Mile plan or the Union District plan it's we are going to build this much
irrigation pipe, we are going to build this many roads, we are going to put in this many
sidewalks and it's very specific and that was a result of some of the legislative changes
that have been made that say an urban renewal agency is supposed to be specific. You
get in, you do your thing, then, you get out, close it down and move on. Okay. So,
that's, again, the district. Not the agency, but the district. The funding part of it. The
agency also has more flexibility to acquire and dispose of real property than the city
does. So, when you want to get rid of something as a city Bill tells you, all right, you got
to declare you are going to sell it, you got to have a public auction, there is a lot more
process to it than the urban renewal agency has. We have to have a competitive
process, but not all of the steps that you do and an urban renewal agency can also
dispose of a piece of property at a loss. It doesn't have to be for fair market value. The
idea being you are putting properties together to facilitate economic development, like,
you know, the projects that you have seen in downtown and to do that you maybe help
cover some of that gap in cost to do the project with the private entity that's going to do
it by providing the property at something less than fair market value, but it does have to
be fair value and that's determined by the board and what you are requiring that
property owner to do with it. So, you typically don't see you just sell property as an
urban renewal agency to do whatever. It's tied to some specific purpose. Any questions
yet? Okay. All right. Powers again to improve and to redevelop property. The urban
renewal agency has the authority to invest, to borrow, to accept grants. Again, we can
issue bonds. There was a recent change. The urban renewal agency used to have
eminent domain authority, but it no longer does. You have to be an elected board. So,
if you were to change the urban renewal agency to elected positions, then, you would
have that authority. I think that was just part of accountability for actually going in and
paying somebody from their -- for their property over their objection. Let's see. So,
these are, again, some of the examples of things that are called out in a plan.
Demolition of buildings. Environmental remediation. Stagnant or undeveloped land.
Public art. Public space. Sidewalks. Parking. All of those things are purposes that you
will see in a plan. Next slide. So, we follow the same budget schedule that the city
does. Same fiscal year. Similar process where we have to have a proposed budget
that's published. You have a public hearing on the budget. The board ultimately adopts
that budget. We are a little bit differently -- different in that as a city you have got
several silos, right, that you need to keep your money within those silos. The urban
renewal agency is one silo essentially. So, we have more flexibility between line items
than the city may for different -- for different silos. But if we do set a budget amount and
we get more money and, then, we budget it and we want to spend it, we have to amend
the budget through the same process, just like you do. As you know, the -- the budget
is an estimate. You don't have to spend all of it -- make that that. So, part of what we
focus on for expenditure of urban renewal funds -- it has to have a primary -- primary
public purpose. So, infrastructure is really easy for an urban renewal agency to spend
money on, right because it's sewer, it's water, it's sidewalks, it's roads, all of that is
public infrastructure, public purpose. That's the focus. When we spend money it needs
to be for a public purpose. Some things that we analyze a little bit deeper and make
sure that there is a public purpose are some of the facade improvement things that we
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 6 of 18
have done downtown. In looking at that the board needs to make sure the vast -- vast
majority of that is for the public benefit, not for the benefit of the private property owner.
So, that's something that they do. It's not your typical infrastructure type project. There
is -- there is a couple of ways that we provide for reimbursement. So, I call them this.
They are not really described as that in code, but a development agreement is -- is
more of a straight reimbursement. So, somebody comes to us and says we need help
with this sewer line and we look at that and say, okay, we are going to fund that, we
have a development agreement, you have to finish the sewer line and it's X amount and
we will pay you on completion and approval and acceptance by the city. So, it's a one-
time reimbursement as soon as it's completed. The other way we fund things -- and
usually for the larger amounts -- is over time. So, that agency has a -- an amount of
money that's going to be generated from that site tax increment that can pay --
reimburse that developer over time. So, they don't get it all at once, they get it over time
from the increment benefit that they generate. As I said, we can do bank loans and
bonds.
Strader: Mr. Lakey?
Lakey: Yes. Go ahead.
Strader: I have a question. I will chime in and I will look around and see if other people
have questions. I'm just curious. I thought -- I recollect -- maybe I'm wrong -- that our
urban renewal districts can't incur debt; is that correct?
Lakey: They can.
Strader: Oh. Interesting. And so my understanding is that the ones that we are using
now are using the increment and the direct reimbursement. Have we ever issued any
debt?
Lakey: So, I don't believe that we have issued bonds in Meridian. We have looked at it
a couple of times. We did have a bank loan back when the COMPASS, VRT building
was built, part of that cost -- there was a loan -- I think it was about 400,000 when I was
first legal counsel way back then. So, they can, but I would say it's not that common for
urban renewal agencies around here to do it. The preference is definitely to say we
have got this amount of money set aside and we will reimburse you or we will reimburse
you over time and the way we do an owner participation agreement is you will get
reimbursed from the money that comes in and the risk is on the developer. That's the
way we do a lot of that long-term funding. We are happy to reimburse you from what
you generate, but we are not going to guarantee that you are going to get paid all the
way back and it's in place for the life of the district. So, that's the way we commonly do
business, but they have the ability to do bonds.
Strader: Thank you. That's helpful.
Taylor: Madam Vice-President?
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 7 of 18
Strader: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Mr. Lakey, can you -- you touched on it a little bit, but could you maybe go into a
little bit more detail? You talked about what's reimbursable and you talked about the
public good or public projects for the benefit of the area. Can you just go into a little
more detail that -- how you distinguish a public benefit versus enhancements for a
particular property and what's reimbursable?
Lakey: So, Madam Vice-President and Council Member Taylor, the -- the easiest way --
the easiest to start is infrastructure. There is -- infrastructure and the right of way.
That's really clearly public infrastructure, public benefit. You are -- you are upgrading
the sewer for this project and somebody else. You are building roads and sidewalks
that everybody's going to use. The other components of that -- when you get on the site
demolition of an old building, that can still be -- it's called out in the code. That can be a
public benefit if you have got a really crummy old building and you are knocking it down
and replacing it, there is a public benefit to that. When you start to talk about like the
exterior of the building, that's a little grayer and you -- and you have more conversation
about is there really a public benefit? For example, here are we -- are we requiring
them -- instead of whatever they want to build and whatever exterior they want to put
on, you need to put something that matches the historic downtown and is more
consistent and that is -- there is a public benefit to that as -- and it's something that we
require that they aren't necessarily required to do if it's above and beyond whatever
facade ordinance or requirements the city may have. So, it's kind of a weighing things,
Council Member Taylor. It's -- it's trying to focus on what -- what you are agreeing to
reimburse and really looking at is there more of a public benefit or is this just for the
private entity. So, we wouldn't fund improvements to the interior of the building to make
it nicer. That's really about those that are in the building and that benefit from it. Get
outside the building there is a little gray on the -- on the exterior part. But the closer you
get to the right of way and within the public right of way the more you are into the public
benefit. Okay.
Strader: Mr. Lakey, if you want to continue. I do have one other question. Just
because it piqued my interest. What guardrails does the City Council have around the
ability for an urban renewal district to issue debt?
Lakey: Madam Vice-President, there really isn't. Once you establish it, then, you
designate that board, the board makes the decision on whether and how to issue bonds
or how to pursue that.
Strader: But at the time that the urban renewal district is created typically wouldn't that
funding mechanism be identified at that time?
Lakey: So, the funding mechanism is set out in state code as to how the urban renewal
agencies can approach it and they still have to operate within those confines.
Strader: Uh-huh. Interesting. Thank you. Please continue.
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 8 of 18
Lakey: So, we talked about the increment financing and the district, the revenue
allocation area. Sometimes there is folks that will say an urban renewal agency is a
taxing entity and increases my taxes. The urban renewal agency doesn't have any
control over the revenue it receives. They can't increase the levy or decrease the levy.
It's all based on the taxing districts that are within the district. So, what the city does,
what the irrigation district does, what the highway district does, those things can affect
the funds that the urban renewal agency receives. So, just a real basic flowchart of how
the urban renewal agency gets its money and this is very basic just for terms of -- of
explanation. So, you have your urban renewal agency boundaries, you have your
taxpayers that are within the urban renewal district. They pay taxes into the county
assessor. The -- say they started this district on January 1 st, 2007. That was the base
district when this was formed. So, the taxable value -- again, for simplicity, of a piece of
property is 100,000 dollars and if the tax generated from that property is a thousand
dollars, then, that's your base, all of that thousand dollars goes out to the city, the -- the
local entities that generate that tax. Three years later if the property value is 150,000,
then, that one thousand dollar base stays with the city and the 500 dollars for that
increased increment goes to the urban renewal agency. So, that's the -- the simple part
of how to explain it and all the taxing entities contribute to that -- that formula. But that's
the basic formula. So, some of the requirements and sideboards. I said every year
renewal agency has to have a plan and if -- if you go outside of that plan you are not --
well, you are not supposed to go outside the plan, you are supposed to stay within it.
The old downtown has a pretty broad descriptive plan, but the new ones don't. They
are -- they are pretty specific. If you go outside of that plan or you amend that plan and
want to change it, that can reset your base. So, that in this case the 2007 base would
get bumped up to when you amend the plan with certain exceptions. So, that nuclear
picture there is kind of like you want to stay within your plan, otherwise, you blow all
your increment. So, either -- you just stay with the plan. That's the rule. You don't want
to amend it other than with the exceptions that you have. I will talk -- some of those
exceptions -- the code provides for some exceptions. So, if it's a technical or a
administerial change to your plan it doesn't require a reset. You have the ability to do a
one-time boundary adjustment. Basically a ten percent area increase. So, you can
bump out one side of it a little bit without causing a reset. De-annexation. The city's
done that, but like the Union District, for example, you take a piece out, that's not a -- an
amendment that requires a base reset. You can also amend it to support -- and I
haven't seen this argued and most people just stay in the plan -- to support growth of
existing commercial, an existing commercial or industrial project, and an existing
revenue allocation area. So, that might be say that Chobani or whoever locates here in
Meridian and you want to go outside of the infrastructure that you have planned for that
particular project, if it's -- if it's an existing one that's there you can provide some more
sewer lines to it. But, again, most people just stay -- with most agencies just stay within
your plan. There is also a requirement if -- some of the bad examples over time that the
legislature has looked at urban renewal agencies that build new government buildings
that don't really contribute to the tax base. So, a new police station or a new library or,
you know, pick your -- your public building. So, there has been legislation over time to
kind of address that where there has been some abuses. If it's a government building
or the special when that legislation was passed that when you -- that year, a multi-
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 9 of 18
purpose sports park facility, so aka in -- three years ago when that was passed we don't
want the Boise Hawks getting urban renewal money to build their whatever wherever
they are going to build it. So, it kind of got generically described as that -- that was --
anyway, an overly specific thing from my mind. But that was adopted. If it's a municipal
building -- so, an administration building, a city hall, a library, a courthouse, a police-fire
station or a jail, if 51 percent or more of the total project cost is contributed from those
public funds, then, it requires a vote. So, that's where urban renewal shouldn't be
paying for public buildings without a vote as in public debt, because you are -- you are
providing alternate funding for an entity that does require a vote for funding. The public
funds, though, don't include federal grants, private donations and the project cost that
you are evaluating doesn't include infrastructure. So, if you are building roads and
public sewer and water to that public building that still benefits everybody and it doesn't
get counted against you in the cost. Vice-President Strader, I know I'm getting close to
time. A couple minutes? What --
Strader: I think that's fine --
Lakey: Okay.
Strader: -- Mr. Lakey. You can -- you can continue for a bit. I want to make sure you
leave enough time for the next item. Don't go far.
Lakey: Okay. Thank you. So, there is a new -- new legislation that carves out the
highway district levies. That was a year or two ago. Because they do infrastructure,
you have to have an agreement between an urban renewal agency and the high -- the
applicable highway district to use those funds on infrastructure within the district and we
have -- we have had a couple of agreements with ACHD for some of the infrastructure.
Work around the Union District, for example. We do have to submit information every
year to a central registry regarding the plan and amendments and budgets similar to
cities. Again, the agencies, the umbrella, it requires a vote to establish a new agency,
but not districts under the agency. So, the city already has an agency. That doesn't
have a Iifespan. What has the Iifespan are the specific districts that are under the
agency. Sometimes people will say, well, the agency is going away in 25 years. Not
really. The district that's formed may be going away in that period of time. Talked about
that. Talked about that. So, we are also subject to the same open meeting laws that
you all have. The same public records laws. Conflicts and ethics similar. There is a
union -- or an urban renewal specific statute where an urban renewal member can't
voluntarily acquire a direct or indirect personal interest in an urban renewal project and
if they do that -- that can be misconduct in office subject to that removal that we talked
about earlier. And same procurement laws for public works construction and bidding
and those kinds of things that you have. Council Vice-President, that's my presentation.
I'm happy to answer other questions if you have them.
Strader: Thank you, Mr. Lakey. Council, any further questions?
Little Roberts: Madam Vice-President?
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 10 of 18
Strader: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Madam Vice President, Todd, thank you so much for your presentation.
Just out of curiosity, we have done our one-time expansion, haven't we, of our
downtown or have we not ever used that?
Lakey: Council Vice-president and Council Member Little Roberts, I think we have
looked at it, but I don't think we have done it for the downtown. At one point we were
looking at the church over there behind the -- the Masons building, but I don't think we
ever did that expansion.
Strader: I think you are getting some help.
Lakey: Oh. Oh, maybe Ashley will correct me.
Strader: We will welcome --
Squyres: Hi. Ashley Squyres.
Strader: --Administrator Squyres. Go ahead, please.
Squyres: We actually did use our one-time ten percent expansion for the Union District.
It was originally established in 2020 with just the Civic Block and the Union 93 Block. In
2021 we expanded that to include half the block bounded by Idaho, 2nd, Main and
Broadway.
Strader: Thank you.
Lakey: Good question. Thank you, Ashley, for correcting that.
Cavener: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Question maybe for Administrator Squyres or you, Mr. Lakey. That ten
percent expansion, though, still falls into the same clock, correct, as the original
downtown?.
Lakey: Vice-President and Council Member Cavener, yes. So, you get that one
expansion, but it's of that existing district. So, it doesn't restart the clock, still subject to
the same.
Cavener: Great. Thank you.
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 11 of 18
Strader: It looks like there are no further questions. Please stick around in case we
need you for the next item. Thank you. These are informational updates and no action
is required at this time.
7. Union 93 Update
Strader: We will move on to Item 7, the Union 93 update. It appears that Mr. Nary, the
city attorney, is listed to kick off our discussion.
Nary: Thank you, Madam Vice-President, Members of the Council. I guess I will start
this discussion mostly with what is pending in court. There is some court actions. We
get a number of questions weekly regarding the property across the street that we have
referred to as Union -- Union -- Union 93 and kind of what the state of that project is.
So, it currently is -- there is four pending lawsuits that have now been consolidated into
one -- into one case in front of the district court. It's currently assigned to Judge
McDevitt, but in the scheduling order the case is set for a three week trial currently to
begin September 3rd and it may get reassigned to a different judge. So, there are a
number of retired judges in the state that will hear cases of this type and so depending
on court schedules and other calendars of both Judge McDevitt, as well as the other
judges currently in the district, it may get assigned to a senior judge. So, it's not clear
yet. It hasn't been assigned as of this last order, which was a few weeks ago. But there
are a number of cases. So, the original case involved -- involves Oakland Construction,
which was the construction manager and financer of the project with Galena, who is the
developer of the project, Lien Holdings, as the developer of the project and the original
lawsuits -- there was actually two filed by Oakland against both Galena and East
Broadway Investment, which is a subsidiary of Galena. They are the financing arm of
that entity. So, that -- those two lawsuits have been now consolidated to one. There is
a subsequent one that's been filed by both CM Company, which was the construction
management company on the project, and they have filed a case against Galena and
East Broadway as well, along with a construction company, Concrete Construction,
which was the construction supplier for the project. So, those are all pending. These
are all damage claims types of projects with the ownership of the -- or the liens on the
property and the ownership of the property being part of the lawsuit. So, the issue by
the parties, the plaintiffs in this case, are either for the money damages they believe
they are entitled to or for the property, then, be sold for, then, the proceeds to be paid
for the money damages. The fourth lawsuit is regard -- is a lawsuit in regards between
the architectural firm or the project against the developer. So, there is four total. The
number -- when I add up the number of damage claims for these four lawsuits, it's about
18 million dollars and so that's still pending. Again no other action. Again, there is a lot
of pleadings in this case. It may or may not happen in September. That's certainly
dependent on the discovery. Again, with the number of players here, because you have
both the development entity, the construction builder, the project -- the construction
manager of the project and as few of the project -- or a few of the lawsuits are involving
subs of the projects, electrical, plumbing, some of the others that will all have liens on it
for various amounts of damage claims. This can get pretty complicated and so it may or
may not happen as soon as September. It could get stretched out. It really is kind of
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 12 of 18
dependent on how long the discovery process takes, but that's the basics of what's
happening currently. So, the question is posed to any of the members of the Council or
the Mayor or the Mayor's Office of, you know, what's happening across street. Basically
we aren't -- the city is not a party of any of it. It really is an ongoing dispute between the
developer of the project, as well as the -- the builders of the project. There is some
damage claims that need to be settled. There is some, obviously, resolutions of the
work that's been performed needs to be resolved. We aren't a part of it. So, we really
just can monitor it as -- as it is right now to see how that is progressing along. But we
don't have any real control or any real party to that at this point.
Strader: Fantastic. Looking around at -- Council, do you have any questions? I have a
few, but I don't want to hog the microphone. Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Thank you, Madam Vice-President. The question I keep getting is this
going to be our equivalent of the Boise black hole? I was going to -- oh, do we have
any idea what's happening in the future with this, since someone started the project and
it's all, obviously, stalled --
Strader: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Yeah. Madam Vice-President, Members of the Council, Council Member Little
Roberts, hopefully not. I wasn't -- I had some involvement in that project as well. So,
hopefully, it doesn't become that. I think Mr. Freckleton can probably answer some of
those. I mean, really, on the lawsuit issue and we really don't have -- we are not a party
to this. Obviously, these are claims for damages. The city doesn't really have a role in
the status of the project as long as they comply with our codes and maintaining the site,
maintaining the safety and maintaining the security, you know, maintaining the
brightness of it, but the -- the -- it being sort of stalled, the construction phase, it's kind of
why the -- in the past 20, 25 years in this area you have seen a couple of these where
they get stalled and, really, the city is sort of -- sort of stuck. I mean we don't really have
a mechanism to make that project move along any faster and so that's kind of why the
Boise hole was like it was for many years. We had a few others like that. We are kind
of in the same boat. We don't have tools to make that happen any quicker than what's
happening now, other than because this lawsuit is pending that's probably going to be
the biggest delay.
Little Roberts: Thank you.
Strader: Mr. Nary, do we know if -- which company is the mortgage holder or at least
has a current security interest in the property besides the sub liens?
Nary: Yeah. Madam Vice-President, so the original lawsuit was filed by Oakland
Construction indicates both they are the construction company, as well as the financier
of the project. So, they were both.
Strader: Interesting. Thank you. Are there any other questions for Mr. Nary?
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 13 of 18
Taylor: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Bill, quick question. Do we know -- you mentioned Oakland was part of the -- as
the financier of the project, but are there other entities who are financiers of this?
Because I understand this is an opportunity zone and sometimes how those were pulled
together there may be multiple parties. Do you have that information what other parties
might be also listed?
Nary: So, Madam Vice-President, Members of the Council, Council Member Taylor, in
the lawsuits they don't indicate another party that's a partnership of some sort with
Oakland Construction. They list themselves as the lender in this project. So, I don't
show another party. I mean the other party of the lawsuits, both Jackson Main is the
architectural firm on the -- on the project and, then, CM Company is one of the other
plaintiffs in that and they are -- both are either from the material work for the -- for the
architect or construction management work that's been performed and, then, there is
subs, as I mentioned before, between electrical, plumbing and some of the others, but
there is nobody else listed as a lender of the original. The amount of money that's
claimed as damages by the other parties other than Oakland were based on work
performed, not -- not alone and Oakland's claim is alone and work.
Strader: Thank you, Mr. Nary. I do have a question for Administrator Squyres, if you
have a moment, Ashley. Just a quick question regarding this. I'm not aware of -- or at
least could you update us as to any infrastructure improvements that have taken place
within the Union District to date?
Squyres: Madam Vice-President, I am unaware of the specifics. We don't typically see
the laundry list of completion until they come in for their reimbursement, which doesn't
happen until the end. We haven't reimbursed Union 93, the developer, in any way. First
of all, we don't have any money within the district. I think we have about 4,000 dollars.
But we don't see that until much later in the process.
Strader: Maybe just a quick follow-up question. If this situation were to continue it
would be very unfortunate. We are all hoping that doesn't occur. But I think the district
lasts until like 2040, but if for some reason this were to kind of become what Council
Woman Roberts was referring to and sort of become our equivalent of like the black
hole, what do we do? You know, at some point do we change directions? Do we
dissolve the district? I mean what would be the types of things you would be
considering at that time?
Squyres: I think a lot will depend on what we do with the Civic Block and how the other
half block that's included in this district how they are redeveloped as well, which I do
know there are some plans and some visioning that is happening right now regarding
that half block. I think our future, hopefully soon, conversations regarding the Civic
Block will help guide us in that. I also hope we can get through this legal process. I
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 14 of 18
understand it's going to be painful. We are going to have to let it play out in the courts.
I can't imagine any way -- anyone coming in and trying to make everybody whole and in
taking over the project as it is. I just don't think that's realistic to expect. So, I think we
need to just kind of bide our time and see how it moves forward. If for some reason we
can't come to an agreement on the Civic Block and we can't come to an agreement on
the other half block as well, then, that is something that we certainly should consider.
Strader: Thank you. Mr. Lakey.
Lakey: So, the urban renewal district is really all carrot, no stick, so to speak. We just
have incentives for reimbursement. So, we have the reimbursement agreements in
place with those entities, but, as Ashley said, we haven't made any reimbursement, but
they -- they bind their successors and assigns. So, somebody that steps in for them
that does buy the project could pursue the reimbursement request as well. Usually
there is some kind of general timelines built into those things. So, at some point we
could potentially get to the point where we are going to possibly terminate those
agreements, but those agreements are an incentive for somebody to come in and buy
the project and finish it. So, you also want to be careful with that.
Strader: Thank you.
Cavener: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Mr. Cavener. Councilman.
Cavener: Ms. Squyres, I know -- I know that's not the scenario that I think anybody
would get excited about. Has the board had any conversations about when to
reevaluate the existence of that district? Is it reassessed in a year, two years, six
months? Has there been any -- if there hasn't been any conversations about it that's
certainly okay. I'm just trying to get a sense about really where the MDC is kind of
winding on this.
Squyres: Councilman Cavener, essentially we have just been giving updates to the
board. You know, there has been these ongoing promises from the developer that
moving forward or moving forward, we got cash infusion, we are -- you know. So, there
has been a lot of hope on our side with the understanding that -- but the reality may not
play out such as that. I think that is a conversation that we need to probably have this
summer, you know, and just kind of feel out the board as to what they are thinking, that -
- as a longer conversation, no, we haven't.
Cavener: Thank you. I appreciate that are.
ACTION ITEMS
8. Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the amount of $339,000 for
Well 26 Water Treatment Facility Construction
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 15 of 18
Strader: All right. If there are no other questions -- so, we appreciate your time. We will
move on now to our Action Items. Item No. 8, Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in
the amount of 339,000 for Well 26 water treatment facility construction and we will turn
this over to Warren Stewart. Thank you.
Stewart: Thank you, Madam Vice-President and Members of the Council. Have to
make sure I get that right. Sorry about that.
Strader: It's a mouthful.
Stewart: I'm here to seek your approval for a budget amendment for the last phase of
the Well 26 treatment project. This project is being done to improve the water quality
that comes from this source. This budget amendment will cost -- cover the cost of
constructing the building and the equipment that goes in that building to house the
filtration equipment that will clean up the water. The treatment tank was -- the treatment
vessel was purchased previously. It is being stored at the Locust Grove reservoir site
until it can be incorporated into this project. The building construction phase of this
project was actually bid out last year, but the bids came in significantly higher than we
expected them to and we opted to not award the bid and not come to you for a budget
amendment at that time, but we actually went back to our consulting engineer and went
through some value engineering efforts to try and find ways that we could potentially
save some costs on this project and, then, we just recently rebid the project and
gratefully that worked. We were able to basically save about a million -- or 1.4 million
dollars on the bid. That comes through a combination of things. I would love to say that
that was all, you know, the value engineering efforts that we went forward with, but
that's not reality. There was some cost savings there and the things that we learned
from that effort we plan to incorporate into future well treatment projects. So, that we
can save that money in the future as well. But we also benefitted by just the fact that
we had a more favorable bid environment for this project. We had a lot more interest
from more contractors and we had a more competitive -- competitive bid and I'm sure
that contributed significantly to our ability to get a better price. Even though that bid
came in quite a bit less than the previous bid did, there is still a shortfall of 339,000
dollars in order to complete this project and put it in service and so I'm here tonight
asking for your approval for a budget amendment for 339,000, so that we can award the
contract and complete the well treatment facility for Well 26. With that I will stand for
questions.
Strader: Thank you, Mr. Stewart. Are there any questions?
Taylor: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Not necessarily a question, but I do have some comments. Would that be
appropriate now or after? I do intend to make the motion to approve it.
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 16 of 18
Strader: Please proceed.
Taylor: Okay. So, spent some time discussing this with our good Director Laurelei.
spoke with her a few times including today. I think it -- we are in a position where we
have to kind of move forward where we are with this project to get it done. It makes
some sense. I think it's the appropriate and wise thing to do. I did want to point out a
couple of things, though. I think one thing when -- I wanted to make this comment
generally for the Council to consider, not just new projects within Public Works, but
elsewhere within the city. We have seen an incredible amount of federal funding for
projects with the ARPA money and the Cares Act money and the federal stimulus and
what that did -- if you looked at Idaho, we are looking at hundreds of millions of dollars
in Idaho for wastewater, drinking water and stormwater projects, enhancements and
things of that nature and to the tune of hundreds of billions nationally. So, we have
created this -- an artificial demand in the market, which has led to an incredible demand
on the materials, the engineering, the labor and so what I think to some degree what we
are looking at on this project is the result of some of that. Like the bids coming in a
million dollars over what we probably projected it to be. I'm really grateful. I think we
did a good job on the value engineering bringing that down. I do agree that -- I think we
found a better environment, so the reason I mention that is I think it would be wise --
and I spoke with our director about this -- to -- to look at it. There are some projects that
we need to move forward with now, but there might be projects where maybe it makes
some sense to wait and so I would encourage all departments to look at our capital
investment into projects and say like are we getting -- is this a good time to go out to
bid, because prices are really really high and I think that we need to be careful about
how we do that. I mean we are saving over a million dollars from the bids we got to
where we are now. So, my recommendation is twofold for the city, is to look at, number
one, do we need to do it now and, number two, the value engineering that went into the
redo, maybe we need to be doing -- trying to look at how we can incorporate that initially
and so I don't have all the answers, I just think that when looking at this -- this issue we
do have a bit of a problem, because there is so much investment into infrastructure that
was designed intentionally to keep things moving, but the result of it is an artificial
demand in these markets where a lot of people want to buy some pipe or they wanted
some engineering, they just can't help it, so there is a limit and I think over time we will
see the market kind of readjust back to more normal and maybe to some degree we
saw that when we went out to bid the second time, maybe things were shuffling. So,
think that as a city we should be considering some of those aspects.
Strader: Thank you, Councilman Taylor. That's an interesting comment. You know, it
-- hopefully we are following our long-term financial planning and so we are, you know,
doing things in a very methodical way and -- and that we do have -- I think through our
procurement department also the flexibility that when we think the environment is not
favorable that's when we can adjust the timing, but I think that's an excellent point. Are
there any other comments or questions or motions?
Taylor: Madam Vice-Chair, for a motion?
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 17 of 18
Strader: Yes, Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: I propose that we approve the fiscal year 2024 budget amendment in the
amount of 339,000 for Well 26 water treatment facility construction.
Strader: Do we have a second?
Cavener: Second.
Strader: All right. Then there is a motion and a second. All those in favor of approving
Item 8 please signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the budget
amendment is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
9. Approval of Construction Contract to Irminger Construction, Inc. for
the Well 26 Water Treatment Facility project for the Not-To-Exceed
amount of $2,295,144.00
Strader: On to Item 9. Do we have a motion there?
Taylor: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: I move that we approve the construction contract to Irminger -- I hope I said that
right -- Construction, Incorporated, for -- for the Well 26 water treatment facility project,
not to exceed the amount of 2.295 -- 144,000 -- I said that wrong. Let me say that
again. 2,295,144 dollars.
Cavener: Second.
Strader: Fantastic. We have a motion on the table and a second for approval of the
construction contract to Irminger Construction for Well 26 water treatment facility
project. Is there any discussion? Okay. If not, all in favor signify by saying aye.
Opposed nay? The ayes have it and Item 9 is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Strader: This brings us -- thank you, Mr. Stewart. This brings us to the end of our
agenda for the work session. Do I have a motion to adjourn?
Cavener: Madam Vice-President?
Strader: Councilman Cavener.
Meridian City Council Work Session
February 13,2024
Page 18 of 18
Cavener: Move we adjourn the workshop.
Strader: Fantastic. There is a motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. We
are adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:22 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
VICE-CHAIRMAN LIZ STRADER DATE APPROVED
ATTEST:
CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Slatestone Subdivision No. 1 (FP-2023-0028) by Ardurra, located
at 2707 S. Stoddard Rd.
STAFF REPORT C�WE IDIAN --
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I D A H O
HEARING February 13,2024 Legend 0
DATE:
Project Location
TO: Mayor&City Council } U
FROM: StacyHersh Associate Planner _ YYI
hW BEAR TRACK DR
208-884-5533
0
_ w p
SUBJECT: Slatestone No. 1 m a
y N U
U
FP-2023.0028 o GRIZZLY DRW
OJo 00
LOCATION: 2707 S. Stoddard Road., in the NE '/4 of �-
!N
the SW 1/4 of Section 24,T.3N.,R.1 W.
(Parcel#S 1224315000)
0
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Final Plat consisting of 12 residential building lots and 4 common lots on 3.395 acres of land in the
R-8 (Medium-Density Residential)zoning district for Slatestone No. 1.
II. APPLICANT INFORMATION
A. Applicant:
Samantha Hammond,Ardurra—2471 S. Titanium Place,Meridian, Idaho 83642
B. Owner:
Brady Lasher, Lasher Enterprises LLC—3930 SE Adilyn Place,Meridian Idaho, 83642
C. Representative:
Same as Applicant
III. STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved
preliminary plat(H-2022-0039) as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The submitted final plat is for
the same number of building lots and common area as approved with the preliminary plat;
therefore,the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as
required.
Page 1
IV. DECISION
A. Staff-
Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section
VI of this report.
V. EXHIBITS
B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 10/03/22)
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
=TT 2I.,E Si 19 IpN .,.w
LJ
r77
z
Lij
j*4
w
coo
Page 2
C. Final Plat(8/09/23)
SLATESTONE SUBDIVISION
LOCATED IN THE—A OF THE—A OF SECTION T4.
TOlAHY1119 NORTH.RANGE 1 l T EOIEE M14RIC49N.
CITY OF MEPCIAN.RDA(YiNN1Y■IAHp
]dR3
tW��P�CiN --_-_-
—_ _—
■
...u.wr
r- r
...,.,�
J 6' � ee .gir �u I I MOTE9
I L-__mod v � � 1 Y � �� .n. � � �.�w.ap.ate.•u�w.�
Mr
Rwr+ -----------
' � A�.���.�iY7rt'��•�"sN
t
�_____-_-_-_- HI
;1":; --, ;-- �� E o �s�€��1 e. ' � � �m]��■,..wwTTl�..w]�,w
.,... f .... i •.0 ' woo ------------ I K a x
R
I1 ■ "�� kmj.— Tw s�(well xw+n ew A"ee�,ew ae
, iT[Vri ww Rw•
eiY�i'x 1]LIO'- _____ wi LSum MonwrN_sou sap von
v]S V,RnTEo soaxu ]° Z1pv�laa y.ewwr.
agyxF� s
�r
r tl
we SNRVEYOR'8 NN3RRTIVE
nr ..au.c wwRao ` 1 ■
wr wer roan a�ewsm � epee tin to�
/ ARDURRA
SHEEP NO.1 OF 3
SLATESTONE SUBDIVISION
CERTIFICATE(K OWHFR6
�x�p�M]I AIR]M3 ful M u9ul�D rx M owns u K FFeFun StAc�4ugp■s
IT
rl/A r M f.Ih n]ttNw i4 Fu.mr]ranT aiY F�■�9�W IIUR Fnd�nxux r�WLG' Op>1F'm p y TO
mx IeanY]orr n ian"k AM mwrr,enn tse rAann.Awr xwes]u.y A W m Rx]In euNwe,sa se]el®p
muau wn Faaas µyapF pp Kwf V fM[WwF.�n0 Nwi 9.pa4a>m WIR,Ta[W�rt
x]mt t/Te eseu a aw seeH ak Tu`S w,m M SDuix [aenm M]tle w xxL
eolagAer a sw'w,h w+'w Iw'M
Y xwnriYw.a16.m e[n no¢I[Awl¢w HV N eo'woTFrt AMwttlll Y M4[Rtei[Ax leff bIC F n�xO M�wF tlNtla ll�a 1■On
n xenrm_m]w noLt Mel, �
A xwsaRaY.wte t¢n I1n1¢ etx K CAs e]anAtn a 5s tAn/t
�l xM]Y00S,tHm wa MtLFs� wr wwmv,m/]]
s}sma'NE.Mew w[T m.E c]N awabwr s aNe mM.xex KV,e]av
�]FAiae']t'oYi]]I.M wiT m K Rew eT aaNtl tmaxa avl,IE Ff!M]iAE Of e.M
�TAyq 3]N Aesy
�T L£RTIFICRTE LY]l1RVEYOR
L Ile1 W Wh.EO,POF[ptw Tune i u�w01[Yga.0 wE 9MNR JD['db
E.tei'ry M 9M p M rywT i/'[*wKi pw[�T6 b M a]■'1•,■.,T M e4T p yeE x�xle]x a
Tee/,pe uw,Tn ale Iet tfd eefR E.u■e•W Iwus ap,K a'wp.uD!V a lUrtT.,e p M 6pAO,apt uY
Fe■CFlVRM■p ud.KA}a4i asA[WiR M F(Yry RufITA,eI[b,�q N
�a1K11R aap M on w MMW.ooR lAq HO O��T P RI[W NS ]JR AIp]ul'M NE K
aGRD N waxW]e fEK s M LT1 F nC 1llRN■I] cow■■Iw[xunol AIR R]I¢An NIe t�e>-xm 1xXllw wFss.
N wT■p>apK.,erA]�ppaal0>R n ewY t�NtT P A.
■F
elm V.11nL Nw,a].Ves anwlQ uL
1
qua�ix tveL
/tip/ARDURRA
SHEET N0.2 OF 2
Page 3
SLATESTONE SUBDIVISION
HCERII 1C IL CF—F—TF 4F CW—SVrn+FVQR
MnVSP KCVS15 TP Y uTTp TO M Kb P rLj•M Ty S4M1'KGa9N 4r �SrV1 CVw neat waK W W@ T�RwT xq nun aryls nR WTi d
Yf•ed1 Jf fll.M LpQtla p 1//LMk ]NrIMY rE]14—ol YLR EE Nrq[L0E Ran1C 10 MPJ o -5
RE•rPOS➢_N IOWIIWIS YRX N[llel fb-I Hi 011p PRE.BY 1iE RSUp1PE Pf A
(p T1SaT1 Q PlravnrWal
LixL.—T IfJLN N1E aQa{q/IrY WRAP YlR
M mm KYrµT M hmmTW lr✓IPL` s,nSSYYpm>Pr aW RUM NPIRaY CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY iRFJ3LIRER
ry![T[dYlWelel]d M_WM d }e_ 4 k U mno m RPTr 1[Lrlm N M Wm ws Y}u"p+Ga.wn p WL
rM TTe N✓PI .p i —.1w e1—w--—1.VrT'Im Lu eweTT
WIYRYW xaK Np Mb R RLL nIi fATTnFaT416 Ya4N vP of�I{lfr�R*}
ITe1 eN5 tlLY.
WINn RnWIRR PaT1
APFrxQ—OF THE" E1+OIREER
l M D MIAW pry[MM 4 M M K MV Or WM[ /P OWF.IMR
rRPfBY wWL6�E M r4dMl�RAT. C6RiIFICAiE C{OOl1NTY RECORDER
9TL E N I Q&
[0.RTi p apa SL
I IERFYY lalifY LILT M NSTRLWII W RID FW RECCflP A jlE IEtlIE91
v �wm
en[xv[nt-IctmwK ere yaT1 rKr r a w
w �F u �s
OaTTT' f ERlue McMpR
.A—OvAL OF THE CRY COUNGL
a nc vnuvam en enr w alln roll u en a HW.TLk am mrn,nwa
ff A�Rf vPr19Vf RL*Taai PWT vSFIVRP b9+vewY4P
�I y
oTr Pe111-MbwV{GTP wo Na Tarn
Y
/`�/AR DURRA
3FiEET NO.9 OF 3
Page 4
O. Common Drive Exhibit
. EXHIBIT SKETCH- RRa&TE URNEWAY, LOT 12
§ UDCATED.MEME14OF THE_OF_r-nOW24,
TOWNSHIP 3_lnH,RANGE,WEST_NEREXAM,
MYOF__,_C_,"JHG
k
w sL._.ac.
b
§
§
$ -- - ---- — BkYUE------
|f |
§ | |
�
%
N
FMATZ DFdVFWAY �§ HCWECfKgATM 2|
|
�F- - I
L I
I �
2 2a ------- --I SMACK uNE
12.W �
t I § |
§ I �
| L�
� §I
I 2 §]
t Im HCNE 'DRUN%IM §|
$ I |
|
§ I
L- — — ————— — -- - - --�
■ � �
�
�
c e » »
2V- /^VARDURRA
�
& m KIDR 9DPADFIE_Y
n_h.iDA k usor
2m442-85■IWNW-ARKRRAMW
Page 5
EXHIBIT SKETCH - PRIMATE DRIVEWAY, LOT 6
LOCATE]N THE PEid4 OF THE 9YYi4 OF SEC;nCN 24,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,FAN E i WEST BO15EMMIDIAF1,
Grff Y OF LERJDU64,ADA-COUNTY,GlsHO
� �� SE1B�5C1� LIE
I I I
I I
I I
I .I
I I
I I I
I
I I
HOME Oftm TAMON
I I
I I
� a I
� I �
I I
fl
I s
zRIVA,TE EIRIVEWAl
0 T
I (&
v iQ m Dx
sedum,._zff1/\VARDURRA
9Si N.159�MP+A4RE WAY
NAMPA.IDAHO43SIF
3w-442.05 aI 1A'WWARDURRA.GOW
Page 6
E. Landscape Plan—Final Plat(dated: 9/19/2023)
LAN.CAn cow-m-.QO fJRA Gs" .,. 6R~_
SL-4TESTpNE 3L18OIVISIpN '
6 ...........�...............
VLE ALL ........
:.
_._.
i
O
LU
Gz
........_emu»_.__.»........,,-iu�tlec,mulE..a
'� C9x6Tli[ICTK1x PI:CIiECilClx
r�s^-.�w ,e �� EY19[MG VE�ATgM1ELFMG
u a
Ell
l
I
{ • - - ❑ z
j3 7 00
� � .. _.. � -"-u_-rs•`�'--Ai o .....,n _ _ '..mac CO 14
F
►i■ EXISTING C.(]NVITIONS PLAN --
Page 7
�? �ue'mlt..n.rw�maus eoxmu-�
5- W�SCORIACT
de
•- I � � I I � � Za
�t --•� I I i I ' I I n 3 y 0
� �•.i I I I I __ ._�o— 0 7
Z t
u
.....:......
r ;LAN C$CA� E MATE RLAL&LP.YOUT PLAN
L9 0
I I i I I
€ I I r
I
I. '
rh
. •"`���—w.scoAwcr. ., - � L�• ,i �— .,raw....a ���,�1
-- -- ---- _
--I ---__ ---r i — ---___-
e gg� .'FERIAL�BCHEOVLE. C
=r------------ �
-
•-[ I '
� I
e _
I I
I , �
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L<.0
Page 8
` --- SH per.41.1'lr: /' DHY CREEK WO
21 a _.,
w /iOECIOD(ID8 TFEEFLP,MIMA Ca) OEfAIL WfIFI RAHIfKKiB .,..,.. ••.•w,w•.• �5 i POP�IPBPMV
'^ L� L l
6 749
A ,7•HCIMjrF CPnTIkX�uVF a ....,,.-. i9 C�OMRRI,ER.FEDESi.LL u0N71 :9'PPESSIIR¢ED F[1TpN CpKDsp! 0 p
a
SS l LAND&'J,PE FJ]AN0 _� ••••1•••ii11f• BHY1t FENCE WEN NSON FEMC£@
Page 9
VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS
A. PLANNING DIVISION
1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this
development: H-2022-0039 (AZ, PP); DA Inst. #2023-001840.
2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years
of approval of the preliminary plat(by November 15, 2024); or, a time extension may be
requested.
3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the
accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized.
4. The final plat shown in Section V.C.prepared by Ardurra, stamped on 8/9/23 by Rob
O'Malley, shall be revised prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, as follows:
a. Note#9: Shall be revised to read"Lots shall not be reduced in size without the prior
approval from the Health Department and the City of Meridian".
b. Note#11: Include the recorded instrument number of the Development Agreement.
c. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number of the temporary License Agreement
with ACHD for landscaping.
d. Add Note to state: "Direct lot access to S. Stoddard Road is prohibited in accordance with
UDC 11-3A-3".
e. Extend the common drive on Lot 12 to be six(6) feet further to the south to ensure at least
20 feet of frontage for Lot 13.
5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.E, dated 9/12/23 prepared by Ardurra, is approved as
submitted.
a. Revise the plans to include landscaping in front of the 10-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to
Stoddard Road in accordance with UDC I I-3B-7.
6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in
UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district.
7. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval.
8. The existing home shall connect to City water and sewer services with the first phase of
development.
9. The existing home will get a new address upon development of the first phase of this project
consistent with the development of the new local street access.
10. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for Phase 1, a 14-foot wide public
pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded for the multi-use
pathway as required by the Park's Department,unless ACHD requires one.
11. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table
11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit.
12. The rear and/or sides of homes visible from S. Stoddard Road(Lots 16-19) shall incorporate
articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,
recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other
integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are
Page 10
visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this
requirement.
13. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-
3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28.
14. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be
submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial
compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14.
15. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat
and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
B. PUBLIC WORKS
https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=330516&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCit
X
Page 11
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Artisan Victory Market (FP-2023-0026, by Judy Schmidt, Bailey
Engineering, located at 2820, 2910, 2960, 2990 and 3020 S. Eagle Rd.
STAFF REPORT C�I
w IDIAN --
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O
HEARING February 13,2024 oI_I J"
Legend
DATE:
III/ JProjeCt Location
TO: Mayor&City Council
FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner
208-884-5533 -
-
SUBJECT: Artisan Victory Market
FP-2023-0026
o
LOCATION: 2820,2910,2960,2990 and 3020 S. - _
Eagle Rd.,in the SW 1/4 of Section 21, ,
T.3N.,R.IE. (Parcel#S1121336051;
S1121336101; S1121336176;
S1121336200; S1121336230; '
S1121336251; and S1121336276)
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Final plat consisting of 4 building lots (4 multi-family and 2 common lots)on approximately 13.6
acres in the R-15 zoning district for Artisan Victory Market.
II. APPLICANT INFORMATION
A. Applicant:
Judy Schmidt,Bailey Engineering— 1119 E. State Street, Suite 210,Eagle, ID 83616
B. Owner
Shannon Ely,BPS Eagle Road LLC, 1401 17'Street, Suite 700,Denver, CO 80202
C. Applicant Representative:
Same as Applicant
III. STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary
plat(H-2021-009 as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The submitted final plat is for the same number
of building lots and common area as approved with the preliminary plat;therefore,the proposed plat
is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required.
Page 1
Private Street(UDC 11-3F-5)
Staff reviewed the application for private streets within the development as shown on the final plat.
The streets are proposed to be located in common lot in the subdivision and will connect to a local
street;the point of connection of the private street to the public street is subject to approval by
ACHD. The Fire Dept.has approved the request contingent upon both sides of the street being signed
"No Parking Fire Lane."No gates or other obstacles are proposed or approved at the entries of the
private streets. The Director has tentatively approved the request subject to completion of the tasks
listed in UDC 11-3F-3B within one(1)year in accord with the Findings listed in Section VII below.
IV. DECISION
A. Staff:
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this
report.
V. EXHIBITS
A. Preliminary Plat(date: 2/6/2023)
FRH1S6@IAHY FMT FON c��
� 1It'1151N YTfTOHY NiM6-ET S'ONI]IYLS'ION y f#
I
I �
I °
I I
W
I
� rr
e rIFFr i F
wa z ....
I
�III I1 11,
L.........
s
SLOCK z
s _
ir
._ i .. Zprc
Z aracx_s j � d
. P-
Page 2
CDNDITIONAL USE PER3llT FOR `
ARTISAN FIMEY IR RKET
�', a re: .IN
y 4;o .
o
�. R, ■ � -- L' HEFT I,.E• ir
It it
IF
mm fig me'
4 z
FITF= --
.g snmJ r
LLJ
--- -- --T�'— --1 -T_ _ o U Q Z
It
s a
— mom_.
low
ME
•-___--____..-.._— _�� ::� � - - --- - ---=tea-,..
-. — - - INoCAOC �i.'a�.. >D
am Casm Eogle Rd. 0, WE z Z
V1 N a
ll
x rc 4
Wam
Page 3
P3AIDPIIVA P] G RH G
1®RYAMET V�
a
VI
a e � IL
0
rr wJ w
aF
ji � � � ■ ■. a��'�r li �.-. z F 6
L fiI wow
z
I i i I Z Z
i iji i ENO
rc ¢ Q
UP-
Page 4
B. Final Plat(dated: 12/18/2023)
PLAT SHOWNG
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
Allnm,n.s�n�T,n
you.�umT rw.p.Jr,.F.1E.BOKE.ERpI�H.
% A 2M a muNTi.Ivaly
�� WiTEx
j, �„�Eni var,r a.�r.:a,•K.«..«« r -------------- i�w��".:i�a o,u*��q� „.`r.�o�.�wi�u,..r..�,Id.w
• of eEanxwc
R
I
d ; M,c vIPI••II..I II„' !I'IEilr iri llt.'I'I+.fiil, ii rii iiii.ii
anmm.i. i
E,, ,c
ID
°
�S.�E w)tiFXW Si. •,III -. .r'ri,H r•1 y III
n `Y,rde rdr d p a ilr
u
� „na
eJlailey Englneerl ng,Inc.
FEET Clxi EnsmEEmnslPunnlxl C.300
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
REAL POINT
OF BEGINNING I
n� P�n�
Qi --- •.W r�.,a ti..
I61 I
I
� ! o e � 11FI g I�
�I I
} a aF
r _ q
I
...........}.ems_.—._[--� 'er�enrr avw 5Y �� WER[vF
SEE SHEET 1 OF S FOa TOTES. Iley En
glneerl ng,IFIC.
FOR"F'+ T"ff. 5 �YILENCINE[m nGlPunnllrCl NN
Page 5
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
�srwt�..n.or
-----------------
k
--�----
o ,arm
I j ,
[JlalkyEnglneering,Inc.
® Ciai Emm—esiP—mi CAGG
xue ix rce.
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
j A� o
�I
Aare
(D •• j .
I ,
aan i
- .s _—__—__����� � T _—__—__ � •.WER 4 OF 7
e Jrlailey Engineering,Inc.
•AEI FEET !x!Btixeerd,eiPunxixci CADD
Page 6
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
LN
Lil
IN
,m.
UT
y
11«9g
stir
Alley
Englneering,Inc.
InEEPo nGIPI.wnIrlClGAW
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
CertXlcote D•Omers Cart-�».
fe e s rrnxw xefe lu,m r.r i�la r.l»elnr[arpfry Ir ur wry e• I.v.I.• I.I�t i. .tT Y 1'I n I�1 keepltl LmJ 4F+et Il�t�•-.I Lr W•"•r� I III'A
A ircpl 'i•-..r1.. .i..:,,N,. i•1 II .I'I.Rnpr lEar.Wr.14Nm. •XrY•'r 'III 1111r1 11, T.li.i.,r.>..
-I t
El-
k•:la ° r1.. EI! Ia1 rlrl�r' - IE{a ITFI 1 TI I i1V
���-I. � �. I��I ...� .I. _I. ,lu•_.I I. E r..l.. --a a lraro„�«, 11779
S
kw��l 1.11. 11�111I FII 1l leral .. 1�Y•�lnr:J M!%e•.1' 1. 'll�r1. •.
'I.1 I I-.'I n I tr II•r m]Ye to k[edur Inl M SUlrarmJ Fell,•1 11 re•o,1 w Y..I 1
rr,rT rr.w
M.1`_I_I ,Ir 1'`1A-•.:J%e..SLdVAe.t.�r.�n Il.d Ir�0A4.fC S alr.�r.ME°�dBY.tlew:V
gee. 1 IV -II.. e • AJe�.d.J�e�.li:
-I•t..e�i�•1 li�L.udsr In.M ftld 1•tl.•aoJ pov Sltd.rbe.o�erJ AI-ewrL enmpm MreM 5[Ne or �x`
`KIT n:van•'Irn•:,-'7 ns Lrt to th xlr.Ilir'T-'+f^'ar Inr a c EaXr xop; _
.fmc.m r..e..e.mti ry rxm IlceNx rnr..maw•.p.a af.aW xtvr rr nanxne. w,�yc n�`H����rro��_�.��P�N�
I II II I I I I -1 I"� �rmr.d♦:..ad Imnd Id.ln�ym.e.en.d n.mm.. hF.N 1141Ea
I-1 i -1 I -y r.11 11 I-.I I�r r:kl1•x..d•m M.vF.tl rm•r•f Ir Mx•Flp ed m . a.
1 1 r Y`111 1 1111 �I�1 t 1�1 III•Thr o»p•p�•a xJr.plN p•.Nl Nu:a ma reo�r irn«nrii�x rtrz ueoK�+r.%enm'°f°�"M'r'm'"�'° r wr
��1 fill - f rV 1�r�111� mrrc aM1r Mr.t•A eryX Fw•^^^rt•rT dF•1
Yrllyt n�n��N n•-mm M�ftll eM•V•+r•n Rl s4nrin.¢�w n•.e�.r xeen.m.mf ar.urr cr
r.mr-Iva.e Filler xotar�It.Ac.e M
xs�M xopl IIF.m Fel.m Ileh1 IllpXY[�IrlglY
!nw ndc!wmirc Ili.[rrpNk
Gap"
n�ryi`
1
rJlalley Englneering,Inc.
c Ins EXGInk>xlnc I PI>W.I,�I cn o0
Page 7
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
.+` .�.�u�,:xi1x:n:..i. m'.1.
.I eimr mrr-0t i O"wrieo mi om ma n i«rowr:nr�e��urc v uoro i
... m+wrc mTw,.ai rn�enr'sK.n rF. . p. ... - ��I.. Y n-ry m qa+rtd wap
N NTH gpiod.no��4�f�-at«eMry mil r - 'rl y Il lr
fY maoinm I f I I..
tieMe�rN�Fe*�xr,arA x�e�aGiuc«uel�t.'.i���r ..I•�� �I..
ecavN o+ [arcll
kc.o-,a o• Hsn.er IN—
e..µrt.a a .rM Ir>•. r• a,.nr xN•.,r a,n•.
,a.nY•Wn•w=r,M Cm.w x_ -h1_„�r.y,l .., �' INI H r yll' NtllS aa/«Gvno-.M o1[�t�
III•i r"'ll I lxlf l•mr lad�YJ!1•VI n�,.amr.un.
Nnlln'e�
�,r R•m•r•r rqr.
+va>^i m rs Er�pwr Cant,fV.mrtl,ri-t.—
n.qn. 'm•a u.u�...n..a w.1.cxl=,r..aa...e.�...y.larva N.rtr:rK.+ s�.m'�'� nn..,rrn n.
mF e.rym eti_nwN-M�IY•rt
:.p
Wer Mw.}
f..i 11TIn
o.r•r rmcnk.r.�b. :n'a`.i
iley Englneering.Inc.
Gip-- M DD
slcer r or a •'''
Page 8
C. Landscape Plan(12/8/2023)
i' LAI
e_
W
Z
.,00
;�,��
n yCC
C
i r
I ailLL
I'll l T LAlGSLAPE
RAN
®® �LO
PL4NT SGW G t' LI I W I. --
I�IrII C!
Ali � �� �� aas'Ei e�Eara
r ..
I II
i ---
- — —�
4 Y
z
i 0
I i � NOTes
Hi
Cc
-f LZ
Ir
.P ... �✓ - IT _„' r } ;MArca��w�i n � �x�
I- III rT�lewr
La
Page 9
MAT LIN
A GMLINE LZ � ---.
���w PANT scHeru
tft
o } � rA
)b
Il LE
I' I
- + t i" � - „1 eEema
L
LLI
o ,
III
,
I +I
I _ J I in Z
!� g m z
p a
NOTes p i a
III
f; M an o 10
ll
n -- --
000
+ � a
III I
II I I° i �c4 '�'1 RIV1
9
m i
4u "
- A ,• mEY MAP�� . -
E
L4 MAT�HLME _
LS EEC i
I -- MATCXLINE L3 -I E
- �� _ Pl"`h I aGHEDULE
r
LLI
i'
1T
¢ ZLE
'.I V. w
0 a�
tl�
W U
o�
Cc
cc
. III tl ` RAH
77 -,T L3
Page 10
---------------
r:
} � S£he>Lavd Fn+'ni
i
MATCFiIrE L4 - "'
uj
■ ram I W=
Cc
I —❑�� �J� KOrr p wa
01101
lV �. } z z
L m
Q
Ll
I EAU
LE
F. , ^ � "�T�� MATOHLINE L8 4"TR- - PLAN
rri
L4
..........
II
y
P
1
LU
liA
w z
C T Z
a�
Z. Vzo
om
03
J-7 El-
�� i yin i i ii a♦i i i iH 5'LArnSUAPE
o 4.. �5
Page 11
_ - Pl.4AT SGHEGULE
r
I*90p
Nn
IIII IIIIIII1:..1I III �iin _six
LL
w z
} a�
NOiFs, Cc pa
><
,... V w U
,ra o, iuuu 11 III 1:-Iv uru ul 0LA
z in
z
J VP
-ANMSCAPr GALGULAYIONS (q -
iiii w ii niiiui ii iu nm
m
cc
Fll IN _I A I I L.I oerALs
L6
Page 12
D. Common Open Space Exhibit(dated: 6/5/2023)
OPEN SPACE IT FOR
ARTISKN VICTORY ..2
9:3
..........
vt
Tf�.
u >
w
OL
z z
z 0
wFa
Oqm
Page 13
E. Site Amenity Exhibit(dated: 6/7/2023)
i
ILI
I.
a — -
LL _
ARTISAN VICTORY MARKET
O aso-isnra
MERIDIAN ID CLIP LANDSCAPE PLAN =--
VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS
A. PLANNING DIVISION
Site Specific Conditions:
1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this
development: H-2022-0066 and DA Inst. #2023-046920.
2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years
of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(i.e. by July 11,2025), in accord with UDC I I-
6B-7,in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested.
3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the
accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized.
4. The final plat shown in Section V.B,prepared by Bailey Engineering, Inc., stamped on
09/18/23 by Cody M.McCammon, shall be revised prior to signature on the final plat by the
City Engineer, as follows:
Plat Notes:
a. Note#5: Revise this note as access to the site was approved from Eagle Road.
b. Note#6: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD permanent easement.
c. Note#7: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD License Agreement.
Page 14
d. Note#8: Include the recorded instrument number for the City of Meridian Sewer and
Water easement.
e. Note#9: Include the recorded instrument number of the existing sanitary sewer
easement.
f. Add note for the 45' ingress/egress easement.
g. The plat shall include the land surveyor signed seal.
5. The Applicant shall obtain Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design
Review approval for the multi-family development prior to building permit submittal.
6. The private streets are approved subject to completion of the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3
within one year. Documentation of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division in order
to receive final approval.
7. The private streets within the development shall be 26-feet wide and constructed in accord
with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4B.2. Gates or other obstacles restricting access are
not approved.
8. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs shall be erected on both sides of the private streets within the
development per requirement of the Fire Dept. and UDC 11-3F-4B.2d.
9. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat
and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for
compliance.
B. PUBLIC WORKS
https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=330553&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit
X
C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ)
https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=331449&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC
hty
D. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD)
https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=331855&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC
hty
Page 15
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project Agreement between Smith Brighton
Inc., DWT Investments Inc., SCS Investments LLC and the City of Meridian
LAKE HAZEL SEWER AND WATER PROJECT
AGREEMENT
This LAKE HAZEL SEWER AND WATER PROJECT AGREEMENT ("Agreement")
is made on this 13th day of February_ , 2024 ("Effective Date"), by and between Smith
Brighton Inc., Inc., an Idaho corporation, whose mailing address is 2929 W. Navigator Drive,
Suite 400, Meridian, Idaho 83642 ("Smith Brighton Inc."), DWT Investments, LLC, an Idaho
limited liability company, whose mailing address is 2929 W. Navigator Drive, Suite 400,
Meridian, Idaho 83642 ("DWT Investments"), SCS Investments LLC, an Idaho limited liability
company, whose mailing address is 3240 W. Bavaria Drive, Eagle, Idaho 83646 ("SCS
Investments") and the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation established under the laws of
the State of Idaho, whose mailing address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642
("City"). Smith Brighton Inc., DWT Investments, SCS Investments and the City may be referred
to herein individually as a"Party"or collectively as the"Parties."
WHEREAS, DWT Investments and SCS Investments own real property located at the
southeast corner of E. Lake Hazel Road and S. Meridian Road identified as Ada County Parcel
Numbers S 1406223152 and S 1406223012 ("Property");and,
WHEREAS, DWT Investments, SCS Investments and Smith Brighton Inc. intend to
subdivide and develop the Property("Development Project"); and,
WHEREAS, to facilitate the Development Project, Smith Brighton Inc. intends to design
and construct certain on- and off-site sanitary sewer lines and water lines("Infrastructure Project"),
as set forth in LDIR-2023-0014—Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project, which is incorporated
herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Project routes a portion of the sanitary sewer mainline
through the Property instead of the E. Lake Hazel Road right-of-way, which is a deviation from
the City's "To and Through"policy; and,
WHEREAS, the aforementioned deviation from City policy may adversely impact the
City's ability to provide future sanitary sewer service to Ada County Parcel Numbers
S 1131336110 and S 1131336155 ("Northern Parcels"), which are located north of E. Lake Hazel
Road; and,
WHEREAS, in order to mitigate this potential adverse impact, the Infrastructure Project
includes a sanitary sewer line from the Property to E. Lake Hazel Road ("Northern Sanitary Sewer
Line"), as depicted in Exhibit A; and,
WHEREAS, the City is willing to approve LDIR-2023-0014—Lake Hazel Sewer and
Water Project, so long as the Northern Sanitary Sewer Line is timely constructed;
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the recitals above, which are incorporated herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:
Page 1 of 3
1. LDIR-2023-0014—Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project. The City shall approve
LDIR-2023-0014—Lake Hazel Sewer and Water Project, even though it deviates from
the City's "To and Through" policy, provided that (A) LDIR-2023-0014--Lake Hazel
Sewer and Water Project complies with all other City requirements and (B) the
Northern Sanitary Sewer Line shall be constructed with the first phase of the
Development Project, as required by Section 2 of the Agreement.
2. Timing of Northern Sanitary Sewer Line. Smith Brighton Inc. shall, at its expense,
construct the Northern Sanitary Sewer Line. The Northern Sanitary Sewer Line shall
be included in and constructed with the first phase of the Development Project.
3. Term. This Agreement shall terminate once the City confirms, in writing, that the
Northern Sanitary Sewer Line has been completed to the City's satisfaction.
4. Notices.Whenever any notice,approval, consent, or request is given or made pursuant
to this Agreement, it shall be deemed delivered (i)when hand delivered; or(ii)one(1)
business day after delivery to FedEx or a similar overnight service for next business
day delivery; or (iii) three (3) business days after deposit in the U.S. mail, first-class
postage prepaid; or (iv) when sent by electronic transmission (email), if such
transmission is promptly followed by any of the other methods for giving notice.
5. Assignment.No Party shall be permitted to assign this Agreement without the express,
written consent of the other Parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and
assigns of the Parties.
6. No agency. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that Smith Brighton Inc.,
DWT Investments and SCS Investments, including their respective employees, agents,
contractors, officials, and officers, are not agents of the City in any manner or for any
purpose.
7. Non-waiver. Failure to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any Party's right to
thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any
time a Party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in
enforcement.
8. Time is of the essence. Time is of the essence with regard to the performance of all of
the Parties' obligations under this Agreement.
9. Exhibits.All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part
hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety in this Agreement.
10. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with
respect to the Northern Sanitary Sewer Line and supersedes any and all other
agreements or understandings,oral or written,whether previous to the execution hereof
Page 2 of 3
or contemporaneous herewith. This Agreement may only be amended via a writing
signed by the Parties hereto.
11.Applicable law. This Agreement shall be governed, construed, and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho.Venue shall be Ada County,Idaho.
12.Incorporation of recitals.The recitals set forth above are fully incorporated herein.
13.Multiple counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by electronic signature
and/or in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original,but
all of which,together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Liz Strader, Council Vice President 2-13-2024
for the Mayor of The City Of Meridian
Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-13-2024
SMITH BRIGHTON IN�,INC.
By.
Robert L. Phi ips,COO
DWT INVESTMENTS LLC
By Brighton Corporation,its Manager
By: r r
Robert L. Phillips,President
SCS INVESTMENTS LLC
an Idaho limited liability company
By: l
Michael A. Hall,President
Page 3 of 3
ti I
l�
^ibai I
' D2a.r a e•we� z,s.s•w a•we I K
,, { P❑-W1L P OA71i r�
4 • �$ 0a od � O
vv 1{
s
I �
7/
i� �2�2iC N,\ rdN - i,Poa7
�Ns �Nk -og R N_is»v
+gM � _ 3 S •�: l �_
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Purchase Order 24-0253 with The Public Restroom Company for
the purchase of two (2) prefabricated restrooms for Lakeview Golf Course for the not-to-exceed
amount of$330,542.00
C�
fIEN .D L4,,
MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL
Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda
From: Darren Brasseur, Procurement Division Meeting Date: February 13, 2024
Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: 0
Topic: Approval of PO# 24-0253 with The Public Restroom Company for the purchase of
two (2) prefabricated restrooms for Lakeview Golf Course for the Not-To-Exceed
amount of$330,542.00
Recommended Council Action:
Approval of PO# 24-0253 with The Public Restroom Company for the purchase of two (2)
prefabricated restrooms for Lakeview Golf Course for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$330,542.00
Background:
This Purchase is permitted by State Statute# 67-2807 and Sourcewell Co-Op Contract# 081721-
PRM.
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 24-2435: A resolution amending the Meridian Police Department
Records Retention Schedule, authoring the Police Chief and the City Clerk to implement the
schedule, and providing an effective date
CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 24-2435
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BORTON, CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS,
OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT RECORDS
RETENTION SCHEDULE; AUTHORIZING THE POLICE CHIEF AND CITY CLERK TO
IMPLEMENT THE SCHEDULE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,by the passage of Resolution no. 23-2428, City Council has adopted a Citywide
Records Retention Schedule, pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-907(5); and
WHEREAS, City Council finds that the following amendment of the Citywide Records
Retention Schedule will realize efficiencies in the retention and destruction of the records listed;
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
Section 1. That the Citywide Records Retention Schedule shall be amended with the addition
of the following category to the records retention schedule of the Meridian Police Department:
RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION
PERIOD
Asset forfeiture Documentation pertaining to the Semipermanent 5 years after
records seizure process and obtaining (Idaho Code closure of case
approval through the courts. section 50-
907(2)(a))
Section 2. That the Police Chief,pursuant to the direction of the City Clerk, the City's
designated records custodian, is hereby authorized to supervise the retention and destruction of records
pursuant to this amendment to the Citywide Records Retention Schedule.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho this 13th day of February,
2024.
APPROVED by the Council Vice President for Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this
13th day of February, 2024. APPROVED: ATTEST:
Liz Strader, Council Vice President Chris Johnson, City Clerk
for the Mayor of the City of Meridian
AMENDMENT OF RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE PAGE I
E IDIAN�-
)AH
AGENDA ITEM
Department Reports
Highlights of Idaho’s URA Laws-
Title 50 Idaho CodeChapters 20 and 29
Idaho Code Sections enterpriseprivate Encourage Developmentdevelopment-removal/redecay -BlightInfrastructure 2033-2001 to 50 -50
URA BOARD inefficiency, neglect or Can be removed majoritycan’t have –City council Counciladvice/consent of members with Mayor appoints
Cooperation with CautionNot Alter Ego of CityConst. under Art VIII Sec 4 Idaho city -a municipal corp. term debt w/out vote. Not entity. Can incur long distinct legal –Rexburg Hart
v. and Yick Kong Alter Ego of CityNot -Independent entity
Powers and Responsibilities Eminent Domain only if electedIssue Bonds without voteInvest, borrow, accept grantsBlight-Improve, renovate, clear and prep for development Acquire/Dispose
of Real and Personal PropertyPrimarily Infrastructureall activities should comply–Plan for each District
EURA PLAN Encourage private development/increase property valuesParkingStreets/sidewalks/walkways/utilitiesPublic open space/parksPublic improvements/infrastructure/facilitiesadequate
sitesassembly of –Development of stagnant undeveloped land Environmental remediationDemo/Eliminate/Rehab obsolete/aged buildingsExamples-
Budget published by 9/1 Final Budget approved and hearingpublish and conduct –Once approve preliminary Include Two previous July/Augusttypically generated –Proposed Budget categories.–Expenses
Estimate of Revenues and same FY as Cities-
How to Help Fund Projects how they work–Bonds Bank loansover timeIncrement generated –OPA ReimbursementStraight -DA ImprovementsReimbursable Public
Idaho Code Sections Generally don’t count voter approved levies.EURA does not control taxes or the amount receivedarea Rev allocation –How Funded: Tax Increment Revenue 2913-2901
to 50-50
Revenue Flows 2007 -1-1Value -Revenue Taxes $$$$500 to EURA / $1000 Tax Ent.2010 Value $150,000-1-1all Tax Ent.-$1000 tax apport. 2007 Value $100,000 -1-1Base Value Date: January
1, 2007ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR ENTITIESTAXING ALL Until ExpiresDistrict/AgencyRenewal Urban Eagle DistrictWithin EURA TAXPAYERS:
REQ’s and SIDEBOARDS 60% vote51% + of project cost = –stadium complex (broader) (specific) and 2903A)-–Base Reset –Amend Plan
REQ’s and SIDEBOARDS info.agency and financial –LSO Central Registry Amendmentsfiling URA Plans and Central Registry for -State Tax Comm. Agreement with URA–Highway District Levies
Agency and District have finite termDistricts/Rev Allocation Areas have a Plan and Plan governance by URA Board subject to –Multiple Districts within the City No specific life span
How New URDs Formed City Adopts Ordinance and PlanNotice–City Council Public Hearing City P&Z reviews Plan for compliance with Comp PlanAgency prep Plan.City Council makes finding
deteriorating area directs Area must meet at least one of criteriaforwards to City URA reviews and approves report and –Study of Area City primarily/ URA initiated
Misperceptions LegislaturePublicKryptonite-
URA Specific Statute I.C. 50 writing and don’t participate in any related actionplanned to be included in a Project then disclose in If currently owns property which knows is included
or If involuntarily acquire disclose in writingproposed contractNo direct or indirect interest in any contract or planned to be included in a URA Projectinterest in URA Project or
property included or Can’t voluntarily acquire direct or indirect personal 2017-
w IDIAN�
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the amount of$339,000 for Well 26
Water Treatment Facility Construction
1/31/2024 11:46AM City of Meridian FY2024 Budget Amendment Form
Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE):
Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E IDIAN�--'
60 3490 41200 11084 Wages C�
60 3490 41206 11084 PT/Seasonal Wages
60 3490 41210 11084 Overtime Please only complete the fields
60 3490 41304 11084 Uniform Allowance highlighted in Orange.
60 3490 42021 11084 FICA $ Amendment Details
60 1 3490 42022 11084 PERSI $ Title: Well 26 Water Treatment
60 3490 42024 11084 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Public Works
60 3490 42025 11084 Employee Insurance $ Presenting Department Name: Public Works
Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 3490
Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 60
Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#:
60 3490 11084 $ Project#: 11084
60 3490 11084 $
60 3490 11084 $ Is this for an Emergency? ❑ Yes 0 No
60 3490 11084 $ New Level of Service? Yes ❑ No
60 3490 11084 $
60 1 3490 11084 $ Clerks Office Stamp
60 3490 11084 $
60 3490 11084 $
60 3490 11084 $
60 3490 11084 $
60 3490 11084 $
60 1 3490 11084 $ 2-13-2024
60 3490 11084 $ Date of Council Approval
Total Operating Expenditures $ - $ $
Capital Outlay
Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date
60 3490 96157 1 11084 Well 26 Construction $ 339,000 60 3490 11084 Ol 1/31/24
60 3490 11084 Department Director
60 3490 11084 REVIEWED
60 3490 11084 By Todd Lavoie at 4:36 pm,Feb 02,2024 jfield s 2.2.24
60 3490 11084 Chief Financial Officer
Total Capital Outlay $ 339,000
Revenue/Donations Approved Doug Taylor via email 2.4.24
Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Cou cilLiaiso�
60 1 3490 1 1 11084
60 1 3490 1 1 11084 1 2-5-24
60 3490 11084 1 Mayor 4L
Total Revenue/Donations $
Total Amendment Request $ 339,000
City of Meridian FY2024 Budget Amendment Form C:\Users\lmcvey\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\J7JO3823\Well 26-budget-amendment-form-12-29-23-CM
zt
Q C r l0 00 V 01 S U'I ? O A S y, W N I--� O N a y
O D rNr O On C O rD c 0 O C O O C O
'C 7 c O n 7 G y C (p fD O O W O
c 7
i1 m O Q ? 3 3 (D 3 rD ° N n N 00
M rD
(D v c 'O•r '� V O 3 O `Z '`S -V CD A
a s o ° D S o m 5 ° d F 0 m
< 3 ° _ °gym° -0 Q n c v,' (D (o �. v W �'p w w c o 0. D
o � C n N 7 O cD rD - Q X c rr .' m O W 00 O <
N a. 0- n 'N-r ° M C In G m N N O_
A ° o ro (D m °' o_ ofD d H w w d CD
OD 2 3 00 (D O - v Q ON w, < y O rD O c K W W OA
(Q ID C 7 Q m ° —• rD O n
v o . m rr• o c
s n — a4 ro ^_ c A v;-
3
O C (D (CL D °- v�i M. N O T 7 0 'N•r — rD (D N n
7 C v v Oc " rD - °- ° N O C 7 '� r0k '�•r W w ON r
3 p C K O � o o < m v K o Q O o o A rD
O
ti rD c 01 C 7 � 3 v, iS C N ►
o rrorb o m Q m a m m 3 c c '^. 3 in v>• to CD
o 3 m
v; rD J'O O O 01 •ti '_+• nYQ 7 (D
m 7 -O .* O 0. N O 01
fb rD c v" o n m ofD N ° a m <
n a• y = �` F N O c n, I
a c
O rD o N_ O m C O 30 j
rD O- N O_ in v O_ S OQ C n
G7 r3r 0- M p N CD Vf i/f i/f
O O w O p (D �' N• 3 N vi O_
a O K O rD p n' 3 U (D• N c Tq O 0) 1 �.
a •ti '�. -° N rF 7 c (D rjj (D rD rD - N n t J
(D 01 O N � A ,0.' O � r--h
Zr m m v ° ° a o v m
3 a u v
O0 Q N (D °, 3 °- v ram',
z m s 3 rD v D° (D m 3 ~'
v, O OZ (D 00 O 7 M N 'O•t v Q 'GU
c (D S F 01 d a (D
O ti 2 m .0N d p (�
C) 0 lb
m v. v. v. -n
x m o_ rD o v Q
S rNp - j (D cr ry N n
CD N (D Ut N rD N (D 3 N CD
�•
D 3' N J
rDm -n
°
Y v EI O C a
dr<( r n
N l
7 O M w c r+ r•r T
m QL NO Q. O A N O
O a 0 �G 6 N �. (D Cr �_ O d N
N rho (D n °� C N ONO N
p (D c rD (D 7 V
N S rD
ra ,r^. ni O0
rD (D
p (D (D n c v v v v v v e Q
d D,
h = Z N :' CD
N
N a O "O K O m - m R•
rB
D
fb Q NO 5 M.
;:vO
NpCD °D ^ c
= O m rn fl_ c W O_ Q o m n c a D C. Q
C) G s N CD rD < 3 3 y a m rDCD
A (DE
GfD
C 6 N ' o m o o p rY
_ �_[ .� 7 (D 3 O_ C n m �' N �' N Z
O
v, rD O_ .^. _. .� N Ch v
\ o C
`C N 5 U .� �' 3 f y M w C G N
O 11 C O r+ rD O N n m m •+
G j/} (DD
V
ago
m OrQM v
N a s r3 ^°o o � v
W �• ° w c
o rD 0 3
m c x c
N n °� 3
6
a �_ a W ° 3 m 3
a `D °_ O m ' a
O mC C
3 C a
CD
C
a
3
CD
0
N
N
r9
N
W
n
K
Mayor Robert E. Simison
City Council Members:
C� IER,IDIAN- Joe trade , President
� Liz Strader,Vice President
A H Doug Taylor
John Overton
Anne Little Roberts
Luke Cavener
TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison
Members of the City Council
FROM: Kyle Radek
Assistant City Engineer
DATE: 1/29/2024
SUBJECT: FY24 BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $339,000 FOR
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION
REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: 2/13/2024
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Move to:
1. Approve the FY24 Well 26 Water Treatment Facility Budget Amendment for
$339,000.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment
II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
Dean Stacey—Engineering Project Manager 208-489-0386
Kyle Radek—Assistant City Engineer 208-489-0343
Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208-489-0350
Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208-489-0365
III. DESCRIPTION
A. Background
Well 26 was completed in 2005. Water supplied by the well contains the levels of
iron and manganese that can cause taste and odor problems as well as brown water.
The decision was made to move forward with a water treatment facility — first
phase was approved by Council in the FY22 budget. In FY23, Council approved
the construction/equipment procurement phase of the project. A water treatment
facility has been designed and filter tank procured for incorporation into
construction.
Page I of 2
In late summer of 2023 the construction of the building was advertised. The low
bid was $3.7M, which was over $1 M higher than available funding.
Value engineering was conducted to identify potential cost saving and were
incorporated into the project. The project was re-advertised. The low bid for the
project is now $2,295,144. However, there is still a budget shortfall necessitating
a budget amendment.
IV. IMPACT
A. Strategic Impact:
This request aligns with the strategic focus areas of Responsible Growth and Public
Health and Safety.
C. Fiscal Impact:
Project Funding Recap:
T--------------------------------------------------r ,
Well 26 60-3490-96157
---------------------------
Total Approved Budget--------------------------------------------- ! $3,823,317
Total Commitments $1,636,494
Balance of_available funding $2,186,823
- r ---- --
2,525,144
Total needed for building construction
including_10%_contingency -------------------------------------------------------------
Fundin shorta e Bud et amendment $339,000
- - -g - ----------------------------)--------------------------------------------- -----------------01-'
V. ALTERNATIVES
Delaying the construction of Well 26 treatment facility would be problematic. The
filter equipment has already been received. Further delay of construction would create
warranty issues with the equipment. It would also affect the delivery of Well 1013,
and Well 24 treatment projects. The execution of these projects must be staggered to
prevent multiple wells from being out of service at one time.
VI. TIME CONSTRAINTS
Funding in spring 2024 will allow Public Works to construct the Well 26 treatment
facility and substantially complete by the end of calendar year 2024.
Approved for Council Agenda: c5L--� 1 Y I"` 1/31/24
Page 2 of 2
E IDIAN
'aAHO
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Construction Contract to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the Well
26 Water Treatment Facility project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$2,295,144.00
C�
fIEN .D L4,,
MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL
Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda
From: Keith Watts, Procurement Manager Meeting Date: February 6, 2023
Presenter: Keith Watts & Dean Stacey Estimated Time: 5 Min
Topic: Approval of Construction Contract to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the Well 26
Water Treatment Facility project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$2,295,144.00.
Recommended Council Action:
Approval of Construction Contract to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the Well 26 Water Treatment
Facility project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$2,295,144.00 and resulting Purchase Order and
authorize the Procurement Manager to sign.
Background:
This contract is the result of Formal Bid #PW-2408-11084.E. Four (4) bids were received.
v W v
W W W N N N N N N N N N N �p pp V 01 lli A W N F+ 3L m Z Z
N F+ O tp Oo J O� In A W N F+ O t0 Oo J O� lli A W N N O
va>
v, q
v v v v v v v v avi moon
'°--,. ra
o o m 3 c 3 S o r
n m °, o '° 9 9ro
O. p_ O. CD
O N J C < .s D O A N W O n d ° T 90 3 N D
Sn
3 o v_i c n w p v N p m p
D r
° o _ G _ ° o D
Z
D
� 3 n
3 �
3
N j
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G a G G G a a a G G G G G G G G G G G
v
A m o
mn
H H H N H H H N N N H H H N f+ f+ f+ f+ W N f+ f+ f+ f+ f+ f+ f+ N N N f+ Fi
a< a o
u C
r
W " A N 01 V A W N V 01 N V N 00 A A 01 W A lli lli A W A N -
Oo O � 3
o� m O N W V V Ol Ot V V W O Oa t0 A W 00 Oo i0 i0 i0 O A Ot i0 tp N A C
l0 N W CO VI N 00 W V V 1p lli lli 00 V N V V N O lli W V 1p O1 1p W2. N
l0 00 N F+ Oi A O o
O coo O O O b O
O O O O O O N
� - n
- - - - - N - - - - - - - - IN IN IN N - IN N IN N N N N IN - - - IN - O � O
W W N J wOn N V N w In �O
l0 lli Ol O l0 01 l0 lli N O A lli N w W I v V V V O V V A " go
Oo
l0 o A
O In Oo V V m m V V W O 00 A V Oi 00 wl0 O A I l0 m m A O O n
1p N W Oo F+ In N W F+ V V F+ tp In In Oo F+ F+ A J J N O In W J tp Oi tp � W ,.
l0 00 N 01 A O i0 W W 01 V V N l0 O V O O O O � A V � O1 lli V � � N -
O
O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N A W A Oi Oi A Oi V V V Oi t0 N t0 N N In In A W N W A V r
O lJ� V O Oo lJ� N A O A A Oi 00 N IN W V �O
O i0 J In N i-+ O T Ot W V Ot p A lli Oo W O i0 A
N W 00 Ol W 00 A l0 O O A 01 N A l0 01 l0 N W l0 O lli Ol V 01 01 �'N N
W In N Oi T 00 A Oi N W W 1p W
O 00 S
l/N w N l N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
w l F� O
N VI A A °t Ot A Ot J V V 01 -O F- Fi F0 N N VI VI A W F� °t W A J-
O lli V lli N A O A A W O l0 ? 01 W 00 00 00 V l0 O ? " W N A wo 01 W n
w l0 d
O V In N O Oi Oi W V Oi Oi Oi Oi O A A Oi A In 00 W O 1p A O O p
N wN W wA i0 O J O F+ A F+ °� N A t0 tp �O �O � W �O O O F+ � N J °� Oi
W VI N p O1 00 A O1 N W W l0 W W N W N N V V O 01 01 W 01 -
O O O � p
O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N A lli lli A N N N A A A N W U� N H 00 W W W N A N t t p N
lJ� O O N O O Oo lli J lli O O O Ni li O O O O li O O O O O O tli Ni In O Oo
M C
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n N
O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O 00 O O 00 00 N ^ w p
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O V S
N A F� VI VI A N N N A A A N W VI N W W 00 W W W N A N VI N O A
In O O N O O 00 In V In O O O In In O O O O O O O O O O O In In In O O 00 O
0 0 0 o vi o 0 0 0 0 o n � O fD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 p p p 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o P o 0 0 o P o o P P
0 0 0 o b o 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
m In w A Oi A w In Oi 0o m N to N w w w F+ r r w w A In w F+ w w
A lli V 1p W ip W N O N Ot
ry
l0 V 00 lli 00 lli l0 V A 00 01 N V lli Ot °1 W V °1 W 00 b 00 W 01 O N b N b -' N
In tp JO A w W N O O W w " O O O O O V V f+ A V tD .s N F
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A
O O �
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n
F� O1 VI W � 01 A � VI O1 00 01 N lli N N V W F+ � W W A �
l0 O 00 Ot W V O N V Ot W A lli V l0 W A l0 W F+ O N 00 Ot n 0 01 3
O N W N N lli l0 N m lli N A " F W w w O N V V W m V O O O 'p
w w Fi V VI 00 VI 1p V A Fi Fi 00 Ot N V VI 00 N 01 W V 01 VI 00 Ot N Ot N l0 0�
In to to V A w w A A� w w W " O O O O O O V 00
O O O J p
O O O O O O O
CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY
PROJECT# 11084.E
THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 1311 day of
February, 2024, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipalcorporation
organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", 33 East
Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, Irminger Construction, Inc. hereinafter referred to
as "CONTRACTOR", whose business address is 25094 Homedale Rd. Wilder, ID 83676 and
whose Public Works Contractor License #is 026529.
INTRODUCTION
Whereas, the City has a need for services involving Water Treatment Facility
Construction; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent
to perform and has agreed to provide such services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Scope of Work:
1.1 Contractor shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this
Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work,
and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the
parties.
1 .2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by
the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data
files, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the
right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any
manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. If any
such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as
to any work which is copyrighted by the Contractor, the City reserves a royalty-free,
non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or
any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so.
1 .3 The Contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement
consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal,
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 1 of 14
11028.E
state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The Contractor
represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that
are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of
performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any
representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor
and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by
the Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either
express or implied, as part of this Agreement.
1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this
Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of
Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be
revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties.
2. Consideration
2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided
in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part
hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $2,295,144.
2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and
supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for
services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days of
receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City. The City will not withhold any
Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by
City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of
all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of
Contractor.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be
entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary,
wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement
including, but not limited to, meals, lodging,transportation,drawings, renderings or
mockups or material escalations. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by
virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance
benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any
type or kind whatsoever.
3. Term:
3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and
shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner
terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some
other method or time of termination is listed in Exhibit A.
3.2 Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially
breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 2 of 14
11028.E
giving written notification to Contractor.
3.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth
in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's
option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City
within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
4. Liquidated Damages:
Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 250 (Two Hundred Fifty)
calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered
Substantially Complete when the Owner has full and unrestricted use and benefit
of the facilities, both from an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor
incidental work, corrections or repairs remain for the physical completion of the
total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time
period in the amount of $300.00 (Three Hundred Dollars) per calendar day. Such
payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of
any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty.
Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 280 (Two Hundred
Eighty) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall
beliable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $300.00
(Three Hundred Dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to
be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of
such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See Milestones listed in the
Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion.
5. Termination:
5.1 If,through any cause,Contractor, its officers,employees,or agents failsto fulfill
in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violatesany of
the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies anyrecord
or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud,
dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or
if City determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of City,
the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate thisAgreement by giving
written notice to Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date
thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effectivedate of such termination.
Contractor may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least sixty (60)
days' notice to City.
In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished
documents, data, and reports prepared by Contractor under this Agreementshall,
at the option of the City, become its property, and Contractor shall beentitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily complete
hereunder.
5.2 Notwithstanding the above, Contractor shall not be relieved of liability tothe
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 3 of 14
11028.E
City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this
Agreement by Contractor, and the City may withhold any payments to Contractor
for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount ofdamages due the
City from Contractor is determined. This provision shallsurvive the termination of
this agreement and shall not relieve Contractor of its liability to the City for
damages.
6. Independent Contractor:
6.1 In all matters pertaining to this agreement, Contractor shall be acting as an
independent contractor, and neither Contractor nor any officer, employeeor agent
of Contractor will be deemed an employee of City. Except as expressly provided
in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or
power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any
obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation ofthe personnel of
the City in the performance of this agreement shall be made bythe City.
6.2 Contractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the
term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent
contractors and not as employees of the City.
6.3 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the
work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor
shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this
Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be
subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of
Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. If in the performance of this Agreement
any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and
exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor.
7. Sub-Contractors:
Contractor shall require that all of its sub-contractors be licensed per State of Idaho
Statute # 54-1901.
B. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees:
The Contractor shall only furnish employees who are competent and skilled for work
under this contract. If, in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is
incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City
property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all
work under this contract.
9. Indemnification and Insurance:
9.1 Contractor shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City and it's
selected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 4 of 14
11028.E
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 5 of 14
11028.E
9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
9.6 All insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the
insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein.
9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the
Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives,employees or subcontractors.
10. Time is of the Essence:
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with
respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure
to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and
a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
11. Bonds:
Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works Improvement
Projects per the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications &
Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof.
Contractor is required to furnish faithful performance and payment bonds in the
amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in
the State of Idaho with a Best's rating of no less than A-. In the event that the
contract is subsequently terminated for failure to perform, the contractor and/or
surety will be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re-procurement of the
contract services.
12. Warranty:
All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted
for 2 years from the date of the City of Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the
Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any
modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof.
All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently
corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty from the date of City's
acceptance of the corrected work.
13. Changes:
The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be
performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the
amount of Contractor's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and
between the City and Contractor, shall be incorporated in written amendments
which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement.
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 6 of 14
11028.E
14. Taxes:
The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the
required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. Items
purchased by the City and used by a contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other
taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the
Contractor's Bid pricing.
15. Meridian Stormwater Specifications:
All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City of
Meridian Construction Stormwater Management Program (CSWMP) manual. The
CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this
address: http:Hwww.meridiancity.org/environmental.aspx?id=13618.
Contractor shall retain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated
on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and
amendments. Prior to final acceptance of the job by the City the contractor shall
return the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for
review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA form
shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be
retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to final acceptance of the project.
16. ACHD:
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate
ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, fines, or penalties City incurs
due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that
Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-of-Way Use
Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the
scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous
with, the term and scope of this Agreement.
17. Reports and Information:
17.1 At such times and in such forms as the City may require, there shall be
furnished to the City such statements, records, reports, data and information as
the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement.
17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or
compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of
four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This
includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every
other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or
representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any
combination thereof.
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 7 of 14
11028.E
18. Audits and Inspections:
At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem
necessary, there shall be made available to the City for examination all of
Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement.
Contractor shall permit the City to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts
from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls,
records of personnel, conditions of employment and other datarelating to all matters
covered by this Agreement.
19. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to
copyright in the United States or in any other country. The City shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any
reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
20. Equal Employment Opportunity:
In performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of
Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31 , U.S. Code
Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take
affirmative action during employment or training to ensure that employees are
treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political
affiliation, marital status, or handicap. In performing the Work required herein,
Contractor shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state orlocal
law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion,sex,
national origin or ancestry, age or disability.
21. Employment of Bona Fide Idaho Residents:
Contractor must comply with Idaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the
Contractor employ ninety-five percent (95%) bona fide Idaho residents as employees on
any job under any such contract except where under such contracts fifty (50) or less
persons are employed, the contractor may employ ten percent (10%) nonresidents,
provided, however, in all cases employers must give preference to the employment of
bona fide residents in the performance of said work.
22. Advice of Attorney:
Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. It has
received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such
advice.
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 8 of 14
11 028.E
23. Attorney Fees:
Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as
may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate
contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture
of this Agreement.
24. Construction and Severability:
If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will
not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as
the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion.
25. Waiver of Default:
Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver
of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall
not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this
Agreement is modified as provided above.
26. Entire Agreement:
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any
and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the
execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith.
27. Assignment:
It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that Contractor shall
not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights underthis
Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of City.
28. Payment Request:
Payment requests shall be submitted to City of Meridian through the City's project
management software. The Project Manager will compare the invoice against the
Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work
has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project Manager will
approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30
from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released
until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission. Retainage of
five percent (5%) of the current contract value will be withheld from the final pay
application(s) until final completion has been met and releases from both the Idaho
Tax Commission and Surety have been received by the City.
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 9 of 14
11028.E
29. Cleanup:
Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of
work and prior to requesting final inspection, the Contractor shall remove all traces
of waste materials and debris resulting from the work. Final payment will not be
made if cleanup has not been performed.
30. Order of Precedence:
The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid
document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document.
31. Compliance with Laws:
In performing the scope of work required hereunder, Contractor shall complywith
all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local
governments.
32. Applicable Law:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian.
Certifications.
Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-2359 and 67-2346, Contractor hereby certifies:
A. That Contractor is not currently owned or operated by the government
of China and will not, for the duration of this Contract, be owned or
operated by the government of China.
B. That Contractor is not currently engaged in, and will not for the
duration of the Contract engage in, a boycott of goods or services
from Israel or territories under its control.
33. Notices:
Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless
otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed
communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt
requested, addressed as follows:
Contractor:
City of Meridian Irminger Construction, inc.
Procurement Manager Attn: Travis Conger
33 E Broadway Ave. 25094 Homedale Rd.
Meridian, ID 83642 Wilder, ID 83676
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 10 of 14
11028.E
208-489-0417 Phone: 208-800-9616
Email: iccitravis@gmail.com
Idaho Public Works License #: 026529
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided.
34. Approval Required:
This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of
Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN: IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BY: BY=
KEITH WATTS, Procurement Manger TRAVIS CONGE , President
DATED: 2-13-2024 DATED:
Approved by Council Date: (if needed)
2-13-2024
Project Manager
Dean Stacey
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 11 of 14
11028.E
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
REFER TO INVITATION TO BID #PW-2408-11084.E. ALL
ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the
Invitation to Bid Package, are by this reference made a part hereof.
SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK
All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version
of the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013
City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any
Addendums).
See separate attached documents:
• WELL 26 TECHNICAL SPECIFCATIONS (262Pages)
• WELL 26 DRAWINGS (100 sheets)
• WELL 26 GEOTEC REPORT (16 Pages)
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 12 of 14
11028.E
EXHIBIT B
MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE
A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $2,295,144.00.
MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE
Milestone 1 Substantial Completion 250 Days from Notice to Proceed
Milestone 2 Final Completion 280 Days from Notice to Proceed
PRICING SCHEDULE
Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment and incidentals as required for the
PROJECT NAME Project per ITB BID #PW-2408-11084.E.
NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT.............................................$2,295,144.0
Contract is a not to exceed amount. Line item pricing below will be used for invoice verification and any
additional increases or decreases in work requested by city. The City will pay the contractor based on actual
quantities of each item of work in accordance with the contract documents.
Contract Pricing Schedule
Section
01025 Description Quantity Unit Unit Price
Reference
2.01 IMobilization and Demobilization 1 LS $21,432.
2.02 Demolition 1 LS $48,111
2.03 JProtection of Existing Well, Pump, and Motor 1 LS $1,569
2.04 JErosion and Sediment Control 1 LS $3,49
2.05Site Grading and Stormwater Facilities 1 LS $47,99
2.06 landscaping and Irrigation 1 LS $17,675
2.07 IFencing and Gates 1 LS $50,43
2.08 rraffic Control 1 LS $5,70
2.09 (Asphalt Paving 1 LS $41,907
2.10 (Concrete Sidewalks, Curb, and Gutter 1 LS $37,92
2.11 --!Water Main Pipe - 12" Diameter 1 LS $67,978
2.12 Water Valve, 10" Diameter 1 EA $4,187
2.13 Water Valve, 12" Diameter 1 EA $9,764
2.14 Iconnection to Existing Water Main 1 EA $5,211
2.15 ater Service Line- 314" and 1" Diameter 1 LS $8,971
2.16Sewer Main Pipe, 12" Diameter 1 L LS $23,487
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 13 of 14
11028.E
2.17 Isewer Service Line, 4" Diameter 1 LS $7,195
2.18 Precast Concrete Manhole-Sewer 1 EA $22,85
2.19 jPrecast Concrete Backwash Equalization Tank 1 LS $65,092
2.20 `Bulk Chlorine Storage Tank and Vault 1 LS $74,317
Sodium Hypochlorite Metering and Dosing 1 LS $20,777
2.21 stem
reatment Facility Mechanical Piping and 1 LS $317,76
2.22 purtenances
2.23Treatment Facility Architectural 1 LS $126,13
2.24 Treatment Facility Structural 1 LS $456,33
2.25 ITreatment Facility HVAC 1 LS $117,892
2.26 �reatment Facility Plumbing 1 LS $79,820
2.27 linstaiiation of Owner-Furnished Equipment 1 LS $66,754
2.28 �reatment Facility and Site Electrical 1 LS $298,16
2.29 Istandby Power Generator 1 LS $105,818
2.30 )Treatment Facility Instrumentation 1 LS $46,032
2.31 ITreatment Facility Electrical Control Equipment 1 LS $55,628
2.32 Startup and Commissioning 1 LS $39,69
WELL 26 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY page 14 of 14
11028.E
CONTRACT CHECKLIST
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Date: 1/30/2024 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT PU IC Works
Project Name: Well 26 Water Treatment Facility
Project Manager: Dean Stacey Contract Amount: $2,295,144
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Irminger Construction/Merrick/Ed Stowe
Is this a change order? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Change Order No.
II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) III. Contract Type
Fund: 60 Budget Available(Purchasing attach report):
Department 3490 Yes 0 No ❑ Construction 0
GL Account 96157 FY Budget: 2024 Task Order ❑
Project Number: 11084.E Enhancement: Yes ❑ No ❑ Professional Service ❑
Equipment ❑
Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes❑' No ❑ Grant ❑
IV. GRANT INFORMATION-to be completed only on Grant funded projects
Grant#: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status(Federal Funded)
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Print and Attach the determination Print,attach and amend bid by addendum(if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach
V. BASIS OF AWARD
BID RFP/RFQ TASK ORDER
Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected Master Agreement Category
(Bid Results Attached) Yes ❑� No ❑ (Ratings Attached) Yes ❑No Date MSA Roster Approved:
Typical Award Yes 0 No ❑
If no please state circumstances and conclusion:
Date Award Posted: 1/24/2024 7 day protest period ends: January 31,2024
VI. CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
PW License 26529 Expiration Date: 1/31/2025 Corporation Status Active-Good Standin
Insurance Certificates Received(Date): 2/6/2024 Expiration Date: 3/11/2024 Rating: A+
Payment and Performance Bonds Received(Date): 2/6/2024 Rating: A+
Builders Risk Ins.Req'd: Yes ❑ No 0 If yes,has policy been purchased? N/A
(Only applicabale for projects above$1,000,000)
VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete)
Reason Consultant Selected ❑ 1 Performance on past projects
Check all that apply ❑ Quality of work ❑ On Budget
❑On Time ❑ Accuracy of Construction Est
❑ 2 Qualified Personnel
❑ 3 Availability of personnel
❑ 4 Local of personnel
Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation:
Kyle Radek 1/30/2025
Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved
Vill. AWARD INFORMATION
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: February 6,2024 Approval Date 2-13-2024 By: Council
Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted
(Only for PW Construction Projects)
NTP Date:
Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final