HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Item Packet
e _
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: Mav 9. 2000
APPLICANT: COLE ASSOCIATES
ITEM NUMBER: 14
REQUEST: CUP FOR REVITALIZATION OF EXISTING BUILDING TO HOUSEA RESTAURANT/OFFICE
IN AN 0- T ZONE
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT.
COMMENTS COMING
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
SEE COMMENTS
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WASTE WATER DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
SEE COMMENTS
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SEE COMMENTS
c>( (/
US WEST:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
~ to
;)'/
{IJ"/-'
~
fJ}f' JiI
SEE COMMENTS
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
SANITARY SERVICE:
SEE COMMENTS
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
"
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
e HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY _
A Good Place to Live ,.,
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(108) 887.2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884.5533 . Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: April 28. 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 10. 2000 HEARING DATE: Mav 9.2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP-OO-022
REQUEST: CUP FOR REVITALIZATION OF EXISTING BUILDING TO HOUSE A
RESTAURANT/OFFICES ZONED OT
BY: COLE ASSOCIATES
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA BUILDING
1- FIRST AND IDAHO
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWERCO.(PREUM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRElIM & FINAL)
_SALLY NORTON, P/Z
_KENT BROWN, P/Z
_THOMAS BARBEIRO. P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER. P/Z
_KEITH BORUP. P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
_CHERIE McCANDLESS. C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
_SANITARY SERVICE
. -----6-UILDING DEPARTMENT
~FIRE DEPARTMENT
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
_CITY PLANNER
YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:
A I-L c...o ucR S U) ; vL.-- /lJ .~JJ.dJ '"/0 /J ,e Iv'! ~ f .
H"'ltl cV'''I'tAl is. U)A-- f&,. ,Surf ["'J ~ A-lurD
h~t[ Sff-;:Vk'(Jrs >;1 s-l<l~ S' w;LL
AJ.u c9 1-0 7J& +p P r<Jf/..,f) 73 ')
/1-1 ~ r- ~ cO i ;:r p/ F; (2 tt:- 'pd! F f
L/-I:J-~()O
,
(i(i CENTRAL CENTRA
.. DISTRICT
_HEALTH
DEPARTMENT
DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
Rezone #
ceon-di~i~nal Use # ~
-~-~,_..- ----
Preliminary f Finalf Short Plat
t2uP -CX:>-O~2
Return to:
lIECjETVED D Boise
APR 1.. DEagle
, 1 8 2000 D Garden City
City of Meridian Ja'Meridian
City ('Jerk Office D Kuna
DACZ
D I.
o 2.
D 3.
D 4.
D 5.
D 6.
D 7.
D 8.
o 9.
D 10.
D II.
D 12.
k3
D 14.
L"c r 'I elk J AI.'U'd:/:'~ ;7;:.,~f,.-k
We have No Objections to this Proposal.
We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal. we will require more data concerning the depth of:
o high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics
o or bedrock from original grade 0 other
This qffice will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted. we can approve this proposal for:
o central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well
o interim sewage 0 central water
o individual sewage 0 individual water
The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare.
Division of Environmental Quality:
o central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water
o sewage dry lines 0 central water
Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
If restroom facilities are to be installed. then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage
Regulations.
We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
dffood establishment 0 swimming pools or spas
~ beverage establishment 0 grocery store
o child care center
Date: L//41 / C6
Reviewed BY:~/~~
COHO 10191 rtb, rev. 1/91
Review Sheet
Ada Count'JJ1ffhwa'J
Judy Peavey-Derr, President
Dave Bivens, Vice President
Marlyss Meyer, Secretary
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner
e
~ijtricl
318 East 37th Street
Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499
Phone (208)387-6100
Fax (208)387-6391
E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us
May 1, 2000
TO:
J. Patrick Laney
Stewart-Laney-Benoit
114 Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
}\ECEIVED
:'1 t~,\" 0 3 2000
City of Meridian
City Clerk OfficE:
-- ----S\J-Bd-EG-T--------f\.1-GUP--OO-~- -----~-- -----~---.------------------- -..
Generations Park Plaza Building I
1 st Street & Idaho Street
The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff has received and reviewed the application and site
plan for the item referenced above. ACHD does not have any site improvement requirements at
this time. The ACHD Commission will not hear this item unless the site plan is changed in such
a manner as to require Commission review.
All future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway
District Policy Manual. ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived in writing by the District.
Contact Ms. Joyce Newton for payment of possible road impact fees prior to building construction
in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as the Ada County Highway District Road Impact
Fee Ordinance.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact at (208) 387-6177.
Sincerely,
~L~-JL
Penelope L. Constantikes
Development Analyst
Cc:
Planning & Development/Chron/Project File
Planning & Development Services-City of Meridian
Ward Schwider
Cole Associates Architects
960 Broadway Ave., Suite 240
Boise, ID 83706
. ::1.
~~~:,. ....
"". l' i
~k.. I
:i,f '.
,'.';'. I"~
.,.;,
, . " '~
~I .
.. .
, .
tl;i:~;::i'"
, ,",
f ,,\q,;::
:ll,i'r1.'>: .
:'\1:.1' .'
~~.:;,t
r~,':.,i
"I j , t,.' ~', I '
"~ -~. . .
~,~ ~;>:;'i : .
i~:r:;K::
,'~ . ~ J}il" '.
",~,j,-h .
. \j!1~"""
"t) '.,~;:;
I' '~l-"" I
.~ )11.+f' !
,..."",..".
:]~~tl~:~" ;'
'~I~n"
.::!~':~ij. '
Ir~ '
F:~r',t
~r$r~1F -
;i!~!.!:;::
"'I
: .
i .
".
.:1 ,"
;, I
,
-_...._...~_.._.---_......:::_. .-;:. '-.,.:.=:...-_.~-:-;::-...:.::..~~~::=.::.::.::=:-_:.::
' , ' ,
.. I
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY I
'e
".1_.
.~"'-'_I:':... \-:_':-._=::;:
.. : MAYOR
~Robert P. Corri~ :.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-250 I
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
R ..IA'.de. '-i
. ~ on Q. rson i., .,' j' I. , i.
"I K' : '. " . - ! .': ~ 1 ,l {',:}:
. '1 . eltn Bird.. .'. i I . :::,1:,.
. I ,. 1\ ", ., '", t
..Tammy ckWeerd .' ~:.:;: '"
l.' . ',.'......1.'
Chime: McCandless ~~. . I .,
I. "
I
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
.... (208)887-2~U . Fax 887,1297
I
I
PLANNING AND ZONING
'. . DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
.'
Mav 9,2000 '
I,.
I~
'!'
. ~
';j:.'.'
ii ~
". U 1
'" 'I~ .1
i
,il:..;
1.,,'. !
,1 ..'
.--
j,
i i
d"/' Zt::.-
, ,.j; ;'i~i<:., i> ',.,
:1. .'ECEIVED"
,', "I:],~?I:~+ '. ')':: : .:~;:; ',' ~" I , I' . I'! ", ::: .
":l.:~;:,i:' ~I~PR 112000 '
~', J'+~f\~~' \ .....(, ,,' " ,," ;,1'::'
,,'\"~A!j..!':.. MendiaQ City '.' .....
+WatFtSu,r&.--- '1Iff
I
"'1
.. ,
1',1
:,;,-
''', ,i"'!i1I
,.':::~-""::
.,:,': "'II,
\, ,':..,
/'
-
B4/24/2BBB 12:B7
2B88885El52
SANITARY SERVICE
PAGE 113
i\IAYOR
Roben D. Corrie
e HUB OF TREASURE V,4LLEY e
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
LEGAL DEPARrMENT
(208) 153.~99 . p~,,- 2S~.~501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 836.42
(~OS) SS8-J..lJ3 . Fu,,- (208) 887.4-8 J 3
Cll)' Clerk Ortice Fax (208) 838-4218
rl 'lll.I\' \\ \ 'ii, f(:.
ilL'IL!)I,"G l)fil'..,I{I':-.a::.:>:T
(108) 8~i.llll - F,,, 8~7. \ e')7
I'LAl"':-J1NG.,l"'D zQt'n",G
DEPARnlENT
(lOB) 3S~-5SJ3 . Fa,,- S~~-(1.~SJ
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
April 28, 2000
HEARING DATE: May 9, 2000
_SALLY NORTON, PtZ
_KENT BROWN, P/Z
_THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER. P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
_CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, elc
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
VSANITARY SERVICE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
=FIRE DEPARTMENT .
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
_CITY PLANNER
APR 24 '00 12:11
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
_MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
-NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
- SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO,(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
U,S. WEST(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMAT10N(PRELlM & FINAL)
"'":b()M P~""FP ~,-os<JQ..r
Aj.)~ (;A""E.~ Al?..! -rb.:> S'm4c..c- - 'TI..U~ COM(JU',?, IAI,LL
,}~~~";'" e~'::':;",~'~. '2fT" i/wW_
Ii
D1I;CETVE::-j'i;
l~~ ~fl
APR 2 4 200G
CITY OF MERIDIAN
2088885052
PAGE. 10
,.
,0_""'01
'- .
1......-.
.co,,'"
-_IO'fj
"'--,
i~-:;-;'
'::~~
'.""""
:....c:j
r
j~*
'"-
~i
.~'"
...........---1
/''.,;
'-:;.~~
.-"''\
.;:;:..,~!t
I ~"< ~'.':'''
.-
. :..-':,'{~~
:"\:.;)1
;~':':::k~{
--;-~
'.,"'--'~
e
.
.'-
,i;i~1l4
CO"~
_..<'i'A
.......~."'"
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Planning and Development Division
Development Application Report
,VI",'
,:--
<~
MCUP-00-023
MY AR-00-008
830 East 1 s< Street and 111 east Pine Street 2 Story Office/Retail Building
:'"-",q
An application for has been submitted to the City of Meridian for conditional LIse approval. The
application has been referred to ACHD by the City for review and comment. The conditional LIse
application is a request to constmct a two-story commercial/office. The applicant is also requesting a
variance for the off street parking. The 0.21-acre site is located at the southeast corner of the 151 Street
and Pine Street. This development is estimated to generate up to 200 vehicle trips per day
(approximately 100 trips per day were estimated for the previous development on this site) based on
the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual.
'C"'''''~
-,'~~.
-"'1,..,
)~iJ
:;~.
,,,,",,
:.:L"'~
Roads impacted by this development:
DDi CE~~ID
lil..12.r -'- v .i2.(
MfW - 5 2000
CITY OF MERIDIAN
East First Street
East Pine Street
Alley
ACHD Commission Date - May 10,2000 - 7:00 p.m.
STATE
PINE
~: II
(1)[
~:
i
0:
0::::
(Y")
o
Z
C"\J!
N
IDAHO
,
--~.,-~..:... -"U'~'''___~__m'__
""--"---'--~.~--"'''--''',~",-----~.",-,,-,,-
MCUP00023 ..Cnlm
Page I
~
e
e
;
I
I
.,-
I ,
I : 300
e
~
~~
&0
p..
--
.
IIII'II"J'" I .-1;
1.110"" .
aD
..
~,
:l
l-
i w
w
a:
l-
e/)
I-
5Q
I-
CJJ
.~
.
I
~!
~:
i~, ~~'
~ ~ '
~
~ ("" :
3,,-~
o
~
t~
------
- -....... nL ~ "'1Il 1411 Io;IQ(. II jJ;w IJI:IoI iII.~ ... l;mi' ~~>>1IiI
SITE PlAN
>G><r~" I
GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA II
:"i
.
cole I associates, P.
@U~~~~~~~~
V fleAnON
REtN-"
-,.-
~
L
r~
,''Zl<Dl
~
~l.
H
--
...,."
;""...j
e
.
Facts and Findings:
A. General Information
,-'
:~n~
Owner - Stewart Laney Benoit LLC
Applicant - Cole and Associates, Stan Cole
OT - Existing zoning
0.21 - Acres
3,100 - Square feet of proposed building (estimated)
N/ A - Square feet of existing building
o - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets
268 - Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ)
,..'
~-
~
"l..,
fY.
~
"..""",
.u:".t~
W est Ada
Meridian
- Impact Fee Service Area
- Impact Fee Assessment District
,- ,
e-"
r --- .
.~
4~
"l.,
!'-/
.==l
~
,=~
East First Street
Minor arterial with bike lane designation
Traffic count of 17,392 on 11/30/99
F -Existing Level of Service
F -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service
160 -feet of frontage
80 -feet existing right-of-way (40-feet from centerline)
No additional right-of-way required
East First Street is improved with a 52-foot street section (two travel lanes, a center turn lane
and two on-street parking lanes) with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. The adjacent
East First Street/Pine Street intersection is controlled by a traffic signal.
,"-
East Pine Street
Collector with bike lane designation
Traffic count of 3,875 on 11/30/99
B -Existing Level of Service
B -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service
120 -feet of frontage
80 -feet existing right-of-way (40-feet from centerline)
No additional right-of-way required
:-;g~,
'- '
f_,.-
.~:ti
--,,,.
""'<'L.;
/"':~
;rt.....~~tJ
?;-:.)">,
:~:".~
, -
v.:;..;.;.:~
d, .~~:"~
,,~,j
.:':"...;),'".::1
,JO"""
'""""j
Pine Street transitions abutting the site. Near the intersection \vith E. 1 'I Street/Pine Street has a
28-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. At the site's easte1l1 boundary, Pine
Street widens to a 60-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. There is a section of
missing curb and gutter abutting the project site. The adjacent E. 151 Street/Pine Street
intersection is controlled by a traffic signal.
Alley
Alley with no bike lane designation
No traffic count available
l'vlCUP00023.cmm
Page 2
'"-
! -,..
;:::..~~
,~p.J
-'~<:
..~
_!~;"'~Jj
.:;:""::-:::,j
",.1-::::--,
;:::2l'~lj
:"::.:r.;;!.1
;;
--::';:~l."'"
~l~~~'~
,:,,,,.~...;1
',.;,",":,"
-.....'1
:...:.::,,-:"~
.-
":...:."1
"";"'\.
.'-"'''''
>'~":':';.4
.....r.I':':""(1
. ~~~:.~
'-~'."')
::r.;~'.
.,;,~
'='j
:: :"3.:;'~;~
.-::-:-.,1
....,....1
-~.;
,.ro_.:)
~-==~-:!j
/1~",\
:C'O:;.'~
";;1s:-1
D.
E.
F.
G.
..~., ~~l
e
e
120 -feet of frontage
16 -feet existing right~of-way (8-feet from centerline)
The alley abutting the south side of the project site is paved but is not paved between this site
and E. 2nd Street. The alley operates as ONE WAY, westbound. The applicant is proposing to
change the alley to ONE WAY east bound. Staff supports the directional change, however, this
will require the applicant the pave the alley from the site's east property line to 2mJ Street to
keep gravel from being tracked out onto the roadway. Coordinate the signage plan alley paving
with District staff.
B.
On April 24, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated
the transportation system in the vicinity. On April 28, 2000, the staff met as the District1s
Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the
District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and
Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements.
C. E. 1 st Street has 17,392 existing vehicle trips per day which is a Level of Service F (LOS F). An
acceptable Level of Service for this segment ofroadway is D (LOS D) or 12,500 vehicle trips per
day. The proposed application will add approximately 100 vehicle trips per day on E. pc Street.
The East First Street/Pine Street intersection operates at a Level of Service D (LOS D), and is
listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic
is not anticipated to decrease the Level of Service at the intersection.
In 1998, the District conducted an analysis of the downtown roadway sections of Meridian. The
District recognizes the level of congestion on E. 1 st Street and developed several alternatives for
long term improvement. These alternatives have been submitted for review by the City of
Meridian and other affected parties. Afinal detem1ination has not yet been made.
The applicant has applied for the vacation of the western portion of the alley (approximately 100-
feet) abutting the project. The vacation request includes a proposal to dedicate a new, north-
south alley to from E. l,t Street to Pine Street. The alley intersection with Pine Street would be
located approximately lOa-feet east of East First Street. The District will review the alley
vacation request under a separate agenda item.
Request for Variance:
The proposed new alley intersection with Pine Street shows that the alley intersection with Pine
Street would be located approximately lOa-feet east of East First Street. Current District policy
requires a minimum intersection offset distance of 1 75-feet from the signalized intersection with
East First Street. The indicated variance is requested because there is no location on the
applicant's site which meets District policy. Staff supports the requested variance for the
following reasons:
· The alley traffic will connect with a collector street, Pine Street, instead of an arterial, E. 1 'I
Street. Pine Street is a lower volume road.
M CUP00023 .C111111
Page 3
e
e
"'~.-;or.~,~
'~
'"
· The alley will be one-way southbound from Pine Street. At the south property line of the
site, the alley is proposed to be east-bound.
· The proposed intersection aligns with an existing driveway intersection on the north side of
Pine Street
--
"':'..!l.4!'1
...;;,:"
,:-"-?
~=...a
.,",'CO",
~:l"l:e:~~
H.
The site has an existing curb cut driveway on E. 151 Street that is not proposed to be utilized by
the site. District policy requires the applicant to close any unused curb cuts on E. 15t Street and
Pine Street abutting the project site. Any new constmction should include curb, gutter and
sidewalk to match the existing improvements. If the alley is approved for vacation, the applicant
should also be required to close the alley/E. 1 st Street approach. Coordinate the alley vacation
with the District's Right-of-Way staff.
":':..:~~':'l
'.~:,". \!'l-l
,j
-'<~.. 1.
i~)
'''''''01
---",?\
:-;:~,.....'i
The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional
traffic generated by additional development. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic
problems. Thereconstmction of East First Street is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work
Program. However, the District has developed a plan to convert East First Street to one-way
northbound operation. Meridian Road would serve as the complementary one-way southbound
operation. The Transportation system would be adequate with this roadway configuration
project.
;;,or,
'-
'c="",,,
..,,-.,1
-'q.
,"-"'.-,.J
>";"'4
I"'~
.""-"'~
The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval:
Site Specific Requirements:
1. Replace unused curb cuts on E. 151 Street and Pine Street with standard curb, gutter and
concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements.
2.
Replace damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on E. 1 sl Street and Pine Street with new curb,
gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall
be determined by ACHD Constnlction Services staff. Contact Constmction Services at 387-
6280 (with file number) for details.
T"
(;:~''''
; -'r'
,","'-""01
.:fl
(:~
...,
J.
No access points to E.l SI Street have been proposed and none are approved with this
app lication.
4. Locate the approach to the entrance only alley on Pine Street approximately 100-feet east of E.
151 Street. Construct the approach as a 20-foot wide curb retum with IS-foot curb radii. Sign
the alley for entrance only. Coordinate signage plan with District staff.
5. Pave the new north/south alley 20-feet wide through the site to District standards. Dedicate 20-
feet ofright-of-way for the new alley through the parcel.
'T'
:;'.,;-,,:'..:j
6.
If the east/west alley is changed to east bound, pave the alley fr0111 the site's east property line
to 2nd Street.
;.:..~ )
"''-
....... . ~
MCUP00023 .cmm
Page 4
.r
4~""
" 7.
r~
~1
~~~~
'-.'...
,"")
:~f~.
i-'"'"'\ 8.
~~~
:.'-=.'1
.r-
'.:'""..",
.,-"
"'r
...
,,r..~
;=._1
;,:'".:c",
"'cd
'='.1
:,,,,c,ll1
~
",;,'j;-'
~i
~,:lr-." .IJ
,T~_-,-;!:t
;j~I:~<\
>A'r'~
:"",,''ll
...
.:=,0,
~<~j
'--1
;,...j
'':~.~':'~'
...^""\
:y;':~":'
. -~.: .~'-1
,:';i 6.
:=~~ ~-: :l
,/"\
'::.:';":::;.,~~
e
e
If the alley is vacated along the south property line the applicant shall be required to close the
alley/E. 1 <t Street approach with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks to match the existing
improvements. Coordinate the alley vacation with the District's Right-of-Way staff.
Other than the alley access specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel
access to Pine Street is prohibited.
Standard Requirements:
1.
A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein
shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request
shall specificallY identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation
of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequitv. The written
request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for
ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the
Commission on the next available meeting agenda.
Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action
do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and
report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those
items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission.
2.
After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action
shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the
action and shall include a minimum fee of $11 0.00. The request for reconsideration shall
specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of
data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request
for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the
Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified
of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard.
..,
j.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building constmction in
accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact
Fee Ordinance.
4.
All design and constmction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An
engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certi fy all improvement plans.
5.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building pemlit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
Construction, use and property development shall be in confomlance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
MCUP00023 .cmm
Page 5
.--'CL~
, _u:;;:.::~j
-'.,
...~., ,":...I
'~:. "::::~~'l
."'.,,-,1
'-
.-.;.~"1
~',j._.::~,i
-",
..,,...)
~'':;'l
. ."\
,.",',1
'.'~,~~;')~
'"''''''1
..::tJ~ 9.
'.,
:,"\;)
--<:.'t~~
t."',,:
"'.::=:"''1'
"""',.1
.-;;>;-i
,-'''..-1
'.-r:.::,:.::.:I
;;~~
".:":'.::.1
"
,,;-'
e
e
7.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to
ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full
business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of~way. The applicant shall contact
ACHD Traffic Operations 387~6l90 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of constmction.
8.
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all mles, regulations, ordinances, plans,
or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
Conclusion of Law:
1.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development
Division at 387-6170.
Submitted bv:
Commission Action:
Planning and Develooment Staff
M CUP00023 .Cl11m
Page 6
MA YOR
Robert D. Corrie
tit HUB OF neEASURh.. VAl.!.F:y e
^ Good Place lo Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 FAST IDAIIO
MERIDIAN, IDAIIO 83042
(208) 888-4433 . ru (20l!) 81\7-4813
City Clc:rk Oftlc.: Pax (108) 888 42 J 8
1.&;/lL DE.!'ARTMENT
(208) 2KR.W)9 . fax 2SS,.2501
CITY COUNCIL MF.MBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeetll
Chc:rie McCandless
PUDl.IC WORKS
DUIL/)(NG DEPARTMENT
(2lll.l) 887.2.211 . f'JX 887.' 2<n
Pl.J\NNINCi ....NO ZONING
D8'ARTM:EN-r
(20~) :!1I4,~~J:l . Fax IlRIl-68S4
MEMORANDUM:
, Ma~? 200CL
REC:bI~r:El)
,-
To:
Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor & City Council
Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to Ci~~~
Shari Stiles, P&Z AdminislraLor ~
_"! A:' r] :~, '[f':0Q
City of I\lerid.i~D.
City Ch~rk OtYl"::,,;
fEll.~;/;k /4)'5
From:
Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit to Demolish Existing Building and Construct 11,942
S.F. Building for OfficeJR.etail Use at 830 E. First Street by Cole Associates (Architect tor
lancyland)
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building which houses Stan's Mowers (known
as the Hitchcock Building) and replace it with an 11,942 s.f. building. Retail use is proposed tor
the lower level (6,008 s.f.), and office use is proposed fur the second floor (5,934 s.f.) This
square footage and combination of uses would result in 11 pW'king requirement of 45 spaces to
med Meridian City Code 11-13-5. Ifomdoor seating areas are proposed (none are shown on the
plan), this requirement would increase. The applicant is proposing to provide 19 parking spaces.
A variance from the parking requirements has been applied for; the public hearing for the variance
will be befure the Meridian City COWlCil on May 16, 2000.
Thi~ ~ite is located in Old Town, which requires a conditional use permit for most uses.
Surronding uses include a City parking lot on Pine Street to the cast; Paisano'g Restaurant across
Pine Street to the north; Phase 2 addition to Meridian Generations Pla:7a to the gouth; and Valley
Shepherd Church of the Nazarene to the west.
The applicant proposes the new building to have no setbacks from the property lines on the north,
west and south.
1. Off-street parking lShall be provided in accordance with the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance Section 11-13-4 and/or as dctajled in site-specific requirements,
and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
2. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby
residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C.
3. Sanitary sewer and water to this facility would be via existing service lines. Assessments
for sewer and water service are determined during the building permit application process.
Applicant will be required to enter into an Assessment Agreement with the City of
Meridian. An assess..ment agrc(""1Ucnt is a vehicle that protects the City of Ml.'ridian anu Lhe
Developer in the everu that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The
agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of a':sessments
MAY 09 '00 14:58
2088886854
PAGE. 01
e
e
Planning & Zoning CoIDDJ.issionlMayor and Council
May 9, 2000
Page 2
and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfiill in assessments. The
overpuyment/shortfull is detennined after adequate historical usage.
4. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and
conditions in addition to current City Ordinances.
5. Applicant shall coordinate the location and constru(,.1ion requirements of the required trash
enclosure with Meridian Sanitary Service, fnc.. and provide a letter of approval from their
office when applying for a Certificale of Zoning Compliance. All trash areas are to be
enclosed by a screening renee.
6. Submit a letter of plan approval from Ada County Highway District when applying for a
Cenificate of Zoning Compliance.
7. All required deciduous trees are to be n minimum. of3" caliper at the time of planting; any
conifer trees are to be a minimum of 6-8' at planting.
8. Handicap parking. associated signage and building construction shall meet the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
9. No signage has been proposed, and none is approved with this application. All signage
will be subject to design review and require separate permits. Temporary signs, banners,
flags, etc., will be specificaUy prohibited.
10. This conditional use permit shall be subject to review upon ten (l0) days notice to the
applicant. The curremt applicant is shown to be the architect, Cole Associates. The
applicant should be the owner of the property (LaneyIand). Transfer of the conditional
Use pennit will need to be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator for any
new o\Vl1erslteoants.
11. Any outooor seating areas need to be de.fined tor review as a part of this application.
Pedestrian walkways (minimwn wid1h of five feet) associated with any outdoor seating
areas need to be provided on the applicant's ovm property. This may entail reduction in
size of the building.
12. The existing alley is proposed to be vacated. One~halt. of the alley (eight feet) would go to
the subject property, the other half would revert back to the City of Meridian to be
included as part of the expanded Generations Plaza. The cunent site plan shows the
encroachment of an awning over the future property line. This needs to be modified to
prevent such encroachment.
13. Applicant has proposed an ~llemaLivt: parking aIToogement whereby cars would enter the
Oom~f1'tiwslJ.CUP.lIoc
MAY 09 '00 1'4:59
2088886854
PAGE. 02
e
tit
Planning & Zoning CommissioniMflyor and Council
May 9, 2000
Page 3
applicant's parking lot from Pine Street and either exit through the City's parking lot on
Pine Street or eastward down the alley. This proposal would require the unl:-way
designation on this alley to be reversed and also require parking lots to be
reconfiguredlrestriped. If this proposal is approved, all costs to reconfigure existing
parking lots and the alley (including, but not limited to. ACHD-imposed requirements,
paving, signage, curbing. landscaping, irrigation, etc.) should be borne by the applicant.
14. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and
shall be submitted to the City Engineer fur all 0 rr-~1reet parking areas, All site drainage
shall be contained and disposed of on-site. No drainage shall be diverted to City of
Meridian property.
15. Applicant is proposing to vacate a portion of the alley. The City has an existing sewer
main in this alley. If the alley is vacated, the applicant will be required to provide an
easement to the City for maintenance of tlti3 line. The easement agreement shall include
provisions that, should the sewer line need to be repaired, all costs to replace
improvements on applicant's property will be borne by the applicant.
16. The Jack of windows on portions of the east side of the building seems to detract from the
overall project. The Planning & Zoning Commission should state their design criteria
concerns and make recommendations to the applicant. Also, please provide a south
elevation, as this design should receive particular attention due to its adjacency to the
City's Generations Plaza.
17. To prevent confusion with City-owned facilities, the project should be named something
other than Generations Plaza.
There are many issues to be considered with this project. Staff considers two of the most
significant issues the lack of parking and redirection of the one-way alley.
One school of thought on the parking issue is that surtBce parking lots are an inefficient, unsightly,
and countetpTodu(..'tive use of space in the downtown core and result in lower densities. They
contribute to more automobiles in the downtown core searching for parking. This creates a less
inviting environment for pedestrians seeking to use the downtown core to socialize, recreate, shop
and work. Whenever possible, opportunities should be explored to replace sUI"'fuce lots with
pedestrian friendly parks, plu.as, outdoor eateries and shopping courts to enb.anc~ -::he overall
appeaJ and vitality of our downtown.
The City's current parking requirements reflect the dependence on the automobile. The applicant
has indicated a willingness to ask employees to park in an area other than the adjacent surface
parking lot. However. this reqWrement can also cause problems in recruiting prospective tenants
and employees due to the inconvenience. Some jurisdictions actually have a maximum amoWlt of
~IOOlIi.._Il,(;UP.duo
MAY 09 '00 14:59
2088886854
PAGE. 03
- -, '" ~
e
e
PJamJing & Zoning CommissionlMayor and Council
May 9, 2000
Page 4
allowable off~street parking.
Other business owners in the downtovm core are understandly concerned about the lack of
parking. Paisano's Restamant received a variance from the off~street parking requirements. The
City needs to explore parking alternatives/solutions, which could include the following:
. Forming an assessment district that could charge individual properties based on
required vs. provided parking spaces (e.g" for every space the applicant does not
provide, the applicant would pay a set fee).
. Provide periphery parking lotslparking garage with a shuttle service to the downtown
area..
. .Impose time limits on aU downtown parking which would require employees to park
elsewhere.
. Signage to direct shoppers to alternate parking sites.
A3 for the one-way alley issue. the Meridian Fire Department and Police Department need to
seriously consider this option and the consequences related thereto. Specific design criteria needs
to be established to facilitate adequate turning radii and signage.
Gcnc:raIicmU ,eup,d.x:
MAY 09 '00 14:59
2088886854
PAGE.Ql4