HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-07-23
3/ Consent Agenda: ..........
S;;A.<TabledJrom April 23, 2002: order~I'~~ting Appeal:AP 01;'00
Stop<VVOrk Order at 2340Wesf Frankliri .... Roadby>Walf Morrow:
Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts arid Cpnclusions of law
for Approval ...... ................... .. < . .
....
Water Account Management
Dir7~~~"eS:APProVe
Change ~r~er No.1 for Chateau Park: APpr~~e:
Change Orde~ ~o'c 4 for~~~~:~~~~ler'S P~rk: Approve
Change Order No; S fQr Meridian Settl~r'~ Park: Approve
...~,_..." R~. ~.~.. - .ii i.....
Depat;trnent eP90:
.~.... ."
A. Mayor: ..
..
.................
.... ...
... ..
...
1.
(i....
..
2. ...
..~'.
...
...:
......
..
....... D~
....
4.
.....
.. ..
............
B.
. ..
.
.
.
..
mu;~ IDE~~I~
CIT'\' COl..lNCIL REGUI;;AR MEETING
AGENPA
...
....
Tue~CI~X, JH.IY~~, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
/....../.
CiW COur'lcil Chambers
~()II-call Atte.,dal1.(:~:
..?
x Tammy deWeerd X
X Cherie McCandless x
x M~Yqr Robert Corrie
.......
Adoptiongf the Agend~: Add Item 102A
...
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
..:
...
..
....
B.
<
Delinquency Notice and Billing
C.
E{
<f
L .: Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position:
Approve ... .................:.
1. F~nance Report: Presented
2. Grant Rese~f~~ Results: Presented :,'c,
................... ...
Meridian City Council.Ag~iJ~~JUly23, 2002 Page I of2
All materials presented at pu blic mcctings shaH become property of the City ofMcridian.
. .... ... . Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities relatcd to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8~~j\~~\r least 48 hou~~prior to the public meeting.
...... ...<.:....:.
...
..........
.......
..
....
...
.
..
...
.
....
.
.
.
.
..
... ..
.. ....
. ..
.
....:.
..
,"~~l:: ~:~t!' ?~ .; ',C c'
.
.
. .
Public Works Dep~t;trllent7'J3r~d V\f~~()n: ii ..........
..........-:/......... .... .......:...... ...
...
W~st~waterFacility Platf Update and WWTP Build-out Pre-
desigp} Agreement for PrOfessiortal Services: Approv7
Carollo Engineers ...../.... ../......
.. ....
Program Fees:
ii... ...........-:-:
I .>>...
...
.......
}
. ..
C.
1.
2.
Wastewater Pretreatment
Hearing for new fees
Set Public
>"-
(Items Moved from Cdhsent Agi~;enda)
'''''.c~ cc ~.~
...
DiscussidnOf ~pproyal df "l".Ei6<<ltive Budg~~: APer()ve
.-:. '..:.:. ...-:..........
..../:-::::..... .....
/.Disclls~i6ri()f Proposed Exchange of SUr pills Pr6p~t;tY ..- Former Fire
StatioriionMeridiciHROad fBrOtl1er Propet"tyand Cash:>..~pprove
set Public Hearing date..c
.:..
5.
6.
7~
8~
7.'
9.
Water; ~E}Vtler arid Trash Delinquencies:
...
02~380
OrdinanCe No.
'. .0'..:..::..
10. Resoluti611 No.
.. ........ :........ ..:.
jOLS. ACHD2ioissolvE}? cl'eate I;;etter
.........
: fOI'Waterand Sewer Amendments:
..
-:.. .
.. ..../:...
. ...
022967
....
: for Weber arid Sewer ~ate ChangE}.-~:
....
11i
per Idaho C()(:te ~67-2345 (1)(il) and (1)(f):
Executive Sessigri
Decision
i?I..
..
......
.>.
...:.,
....
....
:..
Meridi~1l City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetirigsshall liCcome property octllciEit;i of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodatiol1fofdisnbililies related todoclIInclltsandlor hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at88~;,443Jnt least48 hours prior to the public meeting.
.
...
....
.... .......: .
i/
....-:...:
..:... ..
...
.<
.... ....
........
.
..
.....
..... ..
No
..<
..
....
....
...
.
. ...................
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
~
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
x
X
Tammy de Weerd K
Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: add /Iei'-' j,! 10 A
3. Consent Agenda:
Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
u/~:J hl"ref'c~~/-'c1el,( ~ a;:!jJr~v~
Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives: aj/tprPV'R-
Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park: "1fJcrrP~
Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park: ?lj:?jJrtJ v.e.--
Change Order NO.5 for Meridian Settler's Park: tifln? ~
4. Department Reports:
f} - A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position: arPYbv'0
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report: fJre J6'~d.
2. Grant Research Results: fJJ?e J.er..--kd-
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page I of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall becomc propcrty ofthe City ofMcridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disnbil ities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
C. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out Pre-
design, Agreement for Professional Services:
.tl.ffl'7?v.e- CdriJ/lo Ei1.9/}z-U/l..s'
2. Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees:
fa-f- "a/A. ~ /1eN ~
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget: ~ve-.-
7.
8.
10 ~
ttY{
11.
(0-13
Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus Property -- Former Fire
Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash:
<$~fIl€- -J:ef ;Olk~
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
Resolution No. tl'Z-- J. tJ {J : for Water and Sewer Rate
Changes: ClfllfC7V'~
Ordinance No. (J'Z -- 9 b 7 for Water and Sewer
Amendments: ~v<-
Executive Session per Idaho Code t67-2345 (1)(b) and (1)(f):
/UJ de c; J1 i..v
;4cfIIJ .- b 5 i/..t'v-G P ~Ie. ~
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page 2 of2
All materials prescnted at public meetings shall become property ofthc City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
August 16, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST
August 20, 2002
ITEM NO.
Approve minutes from July 23, 2002 City Council Regular Meeting
3-1L
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMP A MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
~
O/fro
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property ot the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCII.2 REGUI.2AR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
x
X
Tammy de Weerd X
Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Add Item 10-A
3. Consent Agenda:
5-A. Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of l.2aw
for Approval
B. Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives: Approve
C. Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park: Approve
D. Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park: Approve
E. Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park: Approve
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position:
Approve
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report: Presented
2. Grant Research Results: Presented
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23,2002 Page I of2
All materials presentcd at public meetings shall becomc property ofthc City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
plea.se contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
(
C. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out Pre-
design, Agreement for Professional Services: Approve
Carollo Engineers
2.
Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees:
Hearing for new fees
Set Public
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget: Approve
7. Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus Property -- Former Fire
Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash: Approve-
set Public Hearing date
8. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
9. Ordinance No.
02-380
: for Water and Sewer Amendments:
10. Resolution No.
02-967
: for Water and Sewer Rate Changes:
10-8. ACHD - Dissolve? Create Letter
11. Executive Session per Idaho Code ~67-2345 (1)(b) and (1)(f): No
Decision
Meridian City Council Agenda- July 23, 2002 Page 2 of2
All materials prescnted at public meetings shall bccome property ofthc City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clcrk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23. 2002
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to
order at 6:30 P.M. on Tuesday, July 23,2002, by Mayor Robert D. Corrie.
Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Bill
Nary, Cherie McCandless.
Others Present: Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Brad Watson, Bill Nichols, and Will
Berg.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd
X Cherie McCandless
X
X Bill Nary
X Keith Bird
Mayor Robert Corrie
Corrie: Hello, I would like to first welcome everybody here this evening.
Also, a particular welcome to the Scouts, Troop 62. They are on their
citizenship badge, to see how the Council works. And I hope that you learn
quite a bit and don't get too discouraged with some of the things you might
hear or think you might hear. So at this time I will open the City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda for Tuesday July 23rd, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. At this
time I would like to have the City Clerk take roll-call attendance, please.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Adoption of the agenda is number two. I would like to ask the
Council if they would like to add under 10-B, discussion of ACHD about the
dissolution question that is coming up before the Ada County Commissioners.
Any ideas of what we might want to do in the next two weeks when they
possibly have the hearing and some of the input to the Ada County
Commissioners.
De Weerd: I have no problem with that.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: On the agenda, also, under the consent agenda, we have item A, order
granting appeal by Walt Morrow. I would like to move that with yours and the
Council's permission to 5-A on the regular agenda and also on the agenda we
will add 10-B, discussion of ACHD. And with those changes, I would move
we adopt the agenda as noted.
Meridian City Councll Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 2 of 51
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay, motion has been made and seconded to adopt the agenda as
noted and corrected. Any further discussion? All those in favor say - no lets
have roll-call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Department reports - oh, first-
Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the consent agenda with Item A being
moved to regular agenda 5-A.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and second. Any further discussion? Roll-call
vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New
Position:
Corrie: Now, department reports, Mayor. On the - I guess I left it back on
my desk. But you were wanting to know about the - this was in reference to
code enforcement and the new position. We did have a meeting with Shari
and also Chief Worley in reference to the code enforcement wanting one full
time and two part-time. With their discussions, we came to the conclusion
that Shari will have the full time position of the code enforcement officer in her
office and the two part time will stay with the police department there. What
they will do is - the full time will be on sign ordinances and most of the
Planning and Zoning ordinances. The two part time will take care of weed
control, parking problems and cars that are Jeft on the street. What they also
- Chief you might jump in if you have anything different, is that when they call
in, anyone of them can take the call and they will direct that call to the proper
code enforcement officer so that they don't have to play tag as to who has
Meridian City Council Meelillg
July 23, 2002
Page 3 of 51
what. So they will all be aware of what they have to do with their jobs and if
one comes in for signs, if Joe or Fred takes it, they will transfer to them
personally. Anything else, Chief, that I missed on that?
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: One question. Where will it be advertised that the people who have
complaints will be phoning into? Will it be Planning and Zoning or will it be
the police department?
Corrie: I don't know. Did ym.l talk about that? I didn't.
Bird: I think that was one of the biggest things that was confusing. People
didn't know who to call or where to call.
Worley: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Bird. We didn't specifically discuss that. Within
the new police building, we have established a specific number for code
enforcement. It goes right to a voicemail box that is specifically dedicated to
those two. J guess in thinking through this Ad-Hoc, we may publish both
numbers. Both -- one for Planning and Zoning for code enforcement and then
as the Mayor indicated, what Shari and I have agreed to do is we'll direct our
people that when they get a call, when somebody calls the police number and
they have a sign complaint, they wont be told to call this other number, they
will be helped, the information taken by that individual and then passed on
internally. You had - understand I wasn't here but I understand there has
been discussion about coordination and what we have agreed we can
probably do is have internal coordination. The three of them coordinate
activities to funnel the things where they need to go as determined by Shari
and myself.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: [am curious. Does one of the things I think we sort of left out in this
discussion, but I don't know what type of vehicles do they use now, are they
going to need another vehicle to be able to get out and investigate and do
that type of thing? I know P & Z had asked for a vehicle but that is for the
planners to use to go out to sites. Is there adequate capability to do that?
Worley: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Nary. We have one car in the police department
that is used by the two part timers because they don't work at the same time.
/
!
Meridian City Council Meellng
July 23, 2002
Page 4 of 51
Stacy just informed me that there is a car put into the P & Z budget for the full
time position.
De Weerd: The $14,000.00.
Nary: I thought that was the car the planners had requested for the planning
department.
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council, the planner car was in the replacement
capital outlay and this is a - she requested an additional small truck for code
enforcement.
Corrie: Thank you. Any other questions?
Bird: Sounds pretty good to me.
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report:
Corrie: Four B. Finance Department Stacy Kilchenmann.
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council, I am not going to review the financial
statements in detail. Everything Jooks under budget except a few items that
are on the amendment list, so I am going to go ahead and speak to the
potential amendment list. If you look at the top where we have the enterprise
fund, the two - there are two items we will need to do. An additional item I
wanted to get your permission or approval of, the first one that we spoke
about before, the person that was not added in the budget. We will need to
go ahead and amend the budget and add that person. The second, the
purchase of the park, we will definitely need to transfer that money to the
general fund. Then under items under consideration, the first item. It says
$145,000.00 for Wastewater Treatment Plant for asphalt roadway. What
John would like to do, is in his budget he had $70,000.00 to - in operating to
redo the asphalt of the roadway. Once he actually had someone look at it, it
became not just an operating expense but a major land improvement
because he discovered he will have to take out and replace some of the older
roadway. He would like to move that down into capital, his operating money.
And then move $40,000.00 from his number three generator project which is
in capital outlay, and $35,000.00 from the potable water project, which is also
just referred to on your projects list as Waste Water Treatment Plant city
water and move those into one project to do the asphalt work. So, we would
essentially make an amendment, which would be transferring from operating
to capital. We wouldn't need to make any kind of amendment to move from
project to project. Under the general fund, the first four items we will not need
,
{
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 5 of 51
to deal with, with exception of the carry forward budget for the police. That is
in addition to work that didn't get done last year that we anticipated will be
done. So its not changing the overall budget amount. Then, of course, the
addition of the parks land from the enterprise fund. The Chamber restrooms,
the amount you approved that is slightly over budget. The Bear Creek
equipment. We will need to make an amendment for the grant revenue for
the police. But that is just a shift, no real net budget change. Then under
items under consideration, the final item is the codification expense. It is now
$9300.00, so we may need to do that. But we will still be looking at the end at
the administration budget as a total, which may cover that extra amount or it
may not. We will probably wait another month until we know for sure. Are
there any questions on the amendments?
Corrie: Thank you, Stacy.
2. Grant Research Results:
Kilchenmann: The other item I had was - on the grant, you had asked us to
start exploring some, the possibility of using grant revenue and some grant
development. So I started some research. We did a survey and I think you
all have the memo. I won't go over the detail or results of the survey. We
might send it out again or actually contact maybe City of Boise, because we
didn't get a response from them. It appears that most of the people who
responded get grants because they are in economically disadvantaged areas
or the population is economically disadvantaged. So that wouldn't be an area
Meridian would qualify as far as population. It looks like most of our
qualifications would probably be in that we can find in the catalog of federal
assistance or Tom is currently looking at a grant from Water Resources, so in
more general areas. So I think what we can do to take it a step further is at
our next staff meeting we can discuss the major departments, Parks, Police
and Fire and how we can go about having a committee or having some
feedback that we can give to you on how each department looks for grants.
Like in the catalog of federal assistance, I can help them find - access that,
and that website is very easy to find. I think, and this is from my experience
and also from contacting and talking to people who use grants. The biggest
part of the grant is not writing the grant or even finding the grant but
implementing the grant. Getting the planning done so it is incorporated into
the budget. Having a project before you even search for the grant so that you
involve the parts of the community that need to be involved in utilizing the
grant. So those are things that we probably need to talk to as a staff with
those major departments who would utilize grants. I don't think we need to
hire a grant writer. I think we can take care of that in house. Are there any
questions about that?
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23. 2002
Page 6 of 51
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: Stacy, you talked to SAGE. As I understand it they work with
other cities in the area and creating grants from youth based types of grants
to economic development. They not only write them, as I understand, they do
some administration of them in complying to the stipulations attached to the
grants. COMPASS also has a grant writer. As far as we talked at our urban
renewal efforts in interchange beautification and they noted that we could
utilize their staff for things like that. So there are different areas outside of
anything economically disadvantaged that we can be pursuing. Its working
with those types of agencies. I know SAGE has a membership fee attached
to it, but I don't know what that is. I guess I would be interested in further
exploring that. I don't think we need a full time grant writer. But I do think we
need to become more aware of what is out there, in particular, Parks and
beautification type projects and certainly our urban renewal efforts.
(inaudible - tape cuts out)
c. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out
Pre-design, Agreement for Professional Services:
Corrie: -- Public Works Department Brad Watson, Wastewater Facility Plan
Update, Wastewater Build-out Pre-design, Agreement for Professional
Services.
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council members, this item is sort of my pet project
over the last year. This is a contract with Carollo Engineers which is required
by DEQ from time to time in addition to doing a pre-design on the rest of the
waste water plant. In other doubling the capacity out there to what we think is
approximately the twenty year population target. We don't usually have the
consultant come and present anything to you when we bring these
agreements to you. This one, just because of the importance and it was one
of our strategic initiatives and because of the size of the contract, Gary and I
thought it would appropriate if we had them come and show off their
credentials a bit and explain in more detail what the project is all about so that
you have a better comfort level if you decide to approve it. There is a bit of
house keeping on this particular agreement. About a year ago we budgeted
$200,000.00 for this project. We have gone through the request for proposals
process. We had five proposals. We interviewed three of those - Carollo
Engineers, Keller Associates and J-U-B Engineers. After much painstaking
deliberation, they were all very qualified - we chose to negotiate with Carollo.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 7 of 51
We have been doing that for the last two months. The contract that we think
is fair and complete and will cover what we need is $235,000.00. You may
remember that last week we discussed an enhancement that would cover the
remainder of that contract, although that is in the next budget year. Carollo
finished the bio-solids management study about three or four years ago and
last year completed the dewatering project. It was a 1.4 million-dollar
construction project out at the plant. I think with that I would like to turn it
over to Tim Tekippe, who is the project manager and his team, Bill Benko and
Stuart Hurley. They have a very short power point presentation to show you.
If you have any questions feel free to interrupt them or me.
Tekippe: Thank you, Brad. Mayor and Council, we appreciate the
opportunity to present our qualifications for this project and to give you a
better idea of what we plan to provide for you and what benefits to the City of
Meridian will come of our project. I am going to quickly give you a summary
of what I am going to talk about today. I am going to give some quick
introductions to the project team we brought with us tonight and give a brief
overview as Carollo Engineers as a firm. Then we will talk about some
specifics for this facility plan update and pre-design project. At the end I have
some summary slides that summarize the work that has been done out at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant over that last ten years and what we envisioned
will happen construction~wise over the next years as well. Let's see, our
project team I brought tonight, as Brad mentioned, is Bill Benko and he is
going to be coordinating the construction, the pre-design documents, most of
the planning and engineering work. Bill brings over 18 years of experience,
specifically in Wastewater treatment. I, myself, am the project manager and I
have worked with Brad and the Wastewater plant staff very closely for about
the last five years. I have eleven years experience total. Stuart Hurley is a
new addition to our project team. He is interested in the project because,
aside from being a Carollo Engineer, he is also a resident of Meridian. So he
is going to working closely with the staff and ourselves. As a whole, Carollo is
a company. We have 22 offices across the United States. Most of those are
in the Western U.S. We have 500 employees. The Boise office has over 30
employees and we have the largest group of professionals that specialize in
water and wastewater treatment in the Treasure Valley area. Aside from
water and wastewater engineers, we also have structural engineers, electrical
engineers, supporting type engineers. This is a map that shows that of the
major treatment plants, treatment plants at large cities such as San
Francisco, Los Angeles, and Portland. We worked at nine of the fourteen
largest plants of the Western U.S. We can add a plant in Las Vegas that we
recently completed. We have started to work in the Seattle area also. We
are happy to say we can bring some big city expertise. What is not shown on
this map are the numerous smaller communities, where we do work as well.
What does all this mean? How can we benefit the city with our qualifications?
We specialize in wastewater treatment. That enables us to bring the newest
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 8 of 51
technologies together with our seventy-year company history of experience to
the table for a project like this. We have proven our ability - Brad mentioned
bio-solids, dewatering project. That was a very successful design and
construction project out at the plant So I think we have proven we can work
well together with the city staff. You are going to benefit by the evaluation of
the newest technology and our experience and our teaming relationship with
the city staff. We have local engineers that we have introduced here tonight
who will champion the project and help to bring it to fruition. I am going to
quickly give an overview of the planning and pre-design memorandums and
documents that we are going to prepare. Bill will talk in a bit more detail and
then after that I will summarize some of the costs that go along with this.
What we had proposed to Gary and Brad and the Wastewater plant staff, was
a project where we subdivide the process areas out at the treatment plant into
eight separate technical memorandum. We concentrate on each of those
process areas and determine the best solution for that. Then at the end we
will bring those all together and summarize those in a final report that is
acceptable and will be approved by state DEQ. This will allow you to get into
their system for the state revolving loan fund, which can provide money for
design and construction of your improvements at low interest rates. This is a
list of the eight memos and the facility plan report at the end. I will turn the
microphone quickly over to Bill who will give us more details on these.
Benko: The scope of work for professional services is for a comprehensive
facility plan. The plant has been divided into these eight areas and we will
prepare a technical memorandum for the areas that encompass the liquid
stream all the way through the treatment process as well as the solids and
residuals management. The technical memorandums are compiled and
summarized at the end into the facility plan that is submitted to DEQ. This
slide is an example of what goes into a technical memorandum. This
example we are using was one that was specifically completed for the City of
Meridian. There is a plant area. We start off with an investigation and a site
visit to really understand the existing facilities. Now technical memoranda are
interactive with the city's staff. We start and review the existing facilities and
then we will scratch our head and come up with some initial technical ideas.
We meet with city staff regularly through this process to share what we are
finding and get their input As we progress, we develop alternatives always
including reviewing the existing facilities on how we can optimize those and
make the most of their use. We identify new alternatives. We establish
criteria to select and review those alternatives and come down with a short
list, meet with the city further and identify the best approach. Under the
scope of our contract there are two main deliverabJes that come with each
stage and with each technical memorandum. The technical memoranda itself
is a conceptual design. How do we approach this? then we take that and
develop it even further into the preliminary design. We use a rule of thumb of
about thirty percent complete. So, we prepare actual drawings that show how
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23. 2002
Page 9 of 51
the facilities area going to look, how they layout, what kind of equipment.
The preliminary design permits you to quickly complete the detail design and
respond to construction either as priorities come up or as a whole project.
Now this slide shows the flow of the whole comprehensive facility plan.
Concurrently while we are addressing the nuts and bolts in the technical
memoranda, we also work with the state DEQ to identify the environmental in
the documentation associated with that. Even though this is a project that
addresses water quality, we need to make sure that our development doesn't
impact some other area of land use or the environment. So we work with
DEQ in planning, sharing the findings of the technical memoranda.
Ultimately, we work to achieve the findings of non-significant impact, which in
general provides for approval of the construction of the treatment plant
expansion. The facilities plan along the way includes public participation
process. Also for the state revolving loan funds, Idaho has funds that are
available at about a four percent interest rate to help with the design and
construction of these improvements. So in January or February, you will take
what is known from the draft facility plan and submit a letter of interest to
DEQ. DEQ looks at all the interested applicants, develops a priority list for
the funding spending for that year and then issues the intended use plan for
that years spending. To be considered with your participation in the revolving
loan fund is how quickly construction needs to happen. There is no
guarantee that you are going to get funding the same year you express
interest in funding because there are other communities out there expressing
interest so DEQ looks at needs and develops the priority list. If you don't get
selected for funding that year, you stay on the list waiting for those projects
higher on the list to get completed and you would move into the range of
fundable projects. The facilities plan, the comprehensive wastewater
document and the findings go in to support your strategic plan. Of course,
Meridian growth is the critical issue. The other issues are meeting stricter
regulations. There is a lot of water quality analysis going on and regulations
continue to evaluate on whether our streams are clean enough in their
present condition. The Boise River and the Snake River have been studying
the nutrient impact. Nutrients are typical nitrogen and phosphorus and how
those pollutants affect water quality. So if there is a water quality study that
changes the treatment requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus, that may
have a design and cost impact on the construction. Also with waste water
treatment plants, its very difficult these days to have your treatment plant out
on the edge of town away from development. The city of Meridian has always
been a good neighbor with their Wastewater Treatment Plant. We will
continue to develop these TM's with this spirit in mind. Some examples of
that are an efficient foot print on the land use and profile of the treatment
plant. Perhaps truck traffic in and out of the treatment plant. Noise. You
haven't had any issues with odors from the treatment plant up until now, and
we will continue to develop those facilities in that spirit. This shows the
general schedule of the technical stages in the facility plan. Basically, we will
Meridian City Council Mee,",g
July 23, 2002
Page 10 of 51
work through the later part of this year, working with the plant staff, to review
the existing conditions and identify what is needed for the next growth cycle
from the technical point of view. Then once the technical matters are
prepared in a draft form, we will submit that with DEQ. The public
participation steps will be set up and worked out with the city. Then, this will
put you in position to at least express interest in submitting for the 2003
revolving loan fund and getting in line at least for the funding. And I will return
to Tim now to summarize.
Tekippe: Thanks, Bill. This particular slide is a brief summary of what has
been happening over the last ten years with the Wastewater Treatment Plant
in Meridian. Much to the credit of the Mayor and Council, Gary, Brad and
their staff, the treatment plant that serves the City of Meridian, has really got
the highest quality water, the most advanced treatment of any plant in the
area. With the incredible growth that you have experienced, you have really
done a good job in staying ahead of the growth curve and planning and
completing projects so that there have been no water quality violations. So
of course our plan is to continue that trend. If you look at the numbers, 1992,
there was about 2.5 million gallons per day of capacity at the treatment plant.
That size was doubled over ten years, which - that is right up there with the
fastest growing cities in the nation. There was several projects and I am sure
you remember most of those projects that happened out at the treatment
plant but there was a total of eight projects that the construction and
engineering costs total about nine million dollars to double the plant. The cost
of engineering is about 20 percent of that. So we wanted to give you these
numbers to relate what the current project and current plan will bring. This
says that in the next ten years, more upgrades are going to be required to
accommodate growth and accommodate these new nutrient requirements
that the state is bringing in an attempt to clean up the rivers in our state to a
higher degree. We are talking about increasing the capacity, almost doubling
it again and meeting those stricter limits. This is an order of magnitude cost
estimate that Brad and I came up with before we do the study. That is the
purpose of the study, to figure out what we need to build and how much it is
going to cost. So I wanted to present this number to give you an order of
magnitude on what we are talking about here. Rather than the previous
projects where the pre-design was done for each individual project, we are
going to do that all together in one large project at one time. This is a
summary of the engineering costs and the current contract that is before you
tonight is $235,000.00 and that is approximately $110,000.00 for the planning
study, to update the wastewater master plan. Then the $125,000.00 for
preparation of the pre-design drawings for each of these components of the
plan. So, that $235,000.00 is approximately two percent of the future
construction cost. That is in line with the industry standards for engineering
planning. Once this is complete further down the road there will be phases
where we do final designs and construction management of the individual
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 11 of 51
projects. At that time, depending on growth and regulations from the state,
you all can decide to do that as one large project, two medium size projects or
several smaller projects. So I will quickly summarize. As a firm, Carollo has
national expertise in wastewater treatment. We have some good local
engineering support to champion your project. We have a proven successful
record in doing planning and design projects for the city. The goal really for
this facility plan and pre-design is to map the required improvements out at
the plant for the next ten years and beyond that. So with that, I would like to
conclude our presentation and invite any questions and comments.
Corrie: Thank you. That was a nice presentation. Council, any questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd. I guess you touched on this - DEQ and some other
environmental agencies are making a lot of stricter regulations and that sort of
thing. How do you anticipate that and are they kind of giving you a heads up
of what might come down the road aways? I guess that is always the huge
challenge of a city is anticipating those regulations and making sure we are
prepared for them.
Tekippe: Yes, and I think Brad has been involved and Bill has, with the state
DEQ and monitoring their progress for regulations. There is a study, the draft
has been completed for the Snake River Hells Canyon total maximum daily
load. That is kind of an evaluation of that particular area of the river and the
amount of nutrients and other pollutants, if you will, that it can accept without
impairing the quality of the water body. So that report has been completed in
draft form - is that, Brad, still out for public comment?
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council, it is my understanding that it still is. We
have prepared comments in coordination with Boise City. We have been
involved in this for three or four or five years. It began with the effluent
trading program that was funded by EPA. We participated in that pilot
program for years. Very early on, we knew what could happen. Anything that
was proposed to us at that time could only get better. They gave us the
darkest hour scenario at that time. We have kind of had that in the back of
our minds the whole time. Really the only pollutant that really impacts us is
phosphorus. The others are non-point source problems.
De Weerd: I guess looking regionally, I know our city participates in those
kinds of forums, but for example, the new septic tank requirements. How is
this going to impact that? That has a rural impact but, in essence, I can see
where that will have some effects in the municipal system in having to pick up
some of that. I guess when we do this plan, as much as we can anticipate, I
would like to see us a part of that. I do appreciate the breadth of your
i.
Meridian City Council Meetlll9
July 23, 2002
Page 12 of 51
experience and some of the larger systems that it looks like you worked with.
I know in the Seattle area, they are composting some of their waste and
actually selling it to the public. Those are the kind of things I hope to see in
these kinds of plans, things you can do.
Watson: Councilmember De Weerd, Mayor and Council. Coincidentally you
mention that - the bio-solids management study that Carollo did for us, their
initial project for us, that was the very focus of that study. That was at the
direction of a former Council member that we initiated that portion - the
composting portion of the study. They took a very hard look at it, and at that
point in time with our production, it was not economically viable. Part of the
scope of this project is to reopen that management study and look at that
again.
De Weerd: I would hope so. I am glad to hear that. Good deal.
Corrie: Any other questions? I am happy to say that ex-Councilman is here
tonight too. Are there any other questions from Council on the request of
Brad for the recommendation to agree with the Carollo Engineers, not to
exceed $235,000.00? Okay. If anybody would like to make a motion for that,
J would welcome that.
Bird: I would move that we approve the agreement with Carollo Engineers for
facility plan update and treatment plant build out pre-design on a time and
material basis not to exceed the amount of $235,000 and authorize the Mayor
sign and the City Clerk to attest.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion been made and seconded. Is there any further
discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Clerk. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Corrie: Okay. Thank you, gentlemen. Nice job.
Watson: Thank you, Mayor and Council members.
2. Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees: Set Public
Hearing for new fees
Watson: Mayor and Council members, the item that we have is a discussion
of the Wastewater Treatment Program proposed fees. I had delivered to you,
hopefully, today a copy of a memo from me briefly describing those fees, as
well as, a pertinent part of the ordinance and a very poor copy of a draft
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 13 of 51
resolution. With me tonight to help answer any questions on this is Celeste
Vialet. I can never pronounce that quite right. She's our pre-treatment
manager out at the Wastewater Plant. I'm going to just briefly run through
some of these fees and please interrupt me if there's any questions. These
were developed similar to the Public Works review and inspection fees based
on typical vehicle, personnel and equipment costs. The first three fees listed
on-first of all, I want to make sure you all have that documentation. Is that
true? Okay. Thank you. The first three fees listed on there are review and
inspection fees. The first bullet point is a pre-treatment application fee in new
commercial construction. That is-often times we get a building permit that's
just a shell with no tenants in it. Those still have to be reviewed for pre-
treatment issues and future pre-treatment, planning connections. The second
bullet point is a tenant improvement, where somebody actually moves in and
the type of establishment has to be evaluated for pre-treatment issues. The
third bullet point is a follow up inspection fee. The commercial accounts are
set up on a grease and interceptor pumping schedule and they are supposed
to send the results or verification of that pumping procedure at a pre-
determined schedule. If they do not get that, then the pre-treatment have to
go out and physically inspect it to make sure that that has been done, will be
done. The second category under sampling fee is intended to recover costs
associated with the pre-treatment staff going out and actually sampling the
discharge from a commercial or industrial account. This is normally only
required when either there is somebody who is chronically in violation. At this
point, from what I understand and maybe Celeste can help me out on this, in
the future with expected pre-treatment rules, this will become a mandatory
task of the pre-treatment staff on-
*** End of Side One ***
Watson: --accounts. The third category is surveillance. This is one that I had
to have explained to me several times. This is intended to recover costs from
investigations initiated for probable cause. In other words, is there's a
petroleum odor that somebody notices from a sewer system and they call the
Wastewater Department and they have to go out and figure out who is
actually contributing that, gasoline, diesel, whatever it is. The time that
they're out there determining that is reimbursed by the person that they might
eventually find in violation of the ordinance. Celeste has a very good
anecdote on that if you're interested in hearing it. I can't remember it all. The
fourth category under permits is fairly self-explanatory. EPA requires that
significant industrial users and there's a long list of what constitutes a
significant industrial user. They must be permitted. It's almost similar to the
City issuing a MPDES discharge permit to an industrial user. Those fees are
not determined at the time of application because until it's reviewed during the
building permit application process, we don't know what they're discharging.
It's sort of a catch twenty-two. So, what we've proposed is that-best case
Meridian City Council Meeting
Jury 23, 2002
Page 14 of 51
scenario, when something came in for a conditional use permit, we could
evaluate that. That doesn't always happen. Most of the time, it's going to be
a project that doesn't require a CUP and then, we'll have to determine the
magnitude of what that permit would be during the building permit stage.
That fee would be payable prior to building permit issuance. The minor
industrial user is similar. I think the only things that's changed on that is the
frequency. Yes. Then, the final bullet point under permits is a septic haulers
permit. This one is very self-explanatory. It's for septic haulers that
discharge at the Wastewater Plant. It's just so they can keep track of who's
licensed. I don't know if it's licensed or who has a permit with the City. That
is all of them. We'd be happy to answer any questions you might have on
these.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I've got one question for Celeste. On your hourly figure, you're figuring
it $17.34 an hour based on a $3,000 a month employee and $3,000 is the
gross, I'm sure. So, I think that's a little cheap if you're paying somebody
$3,000 a month and then you add about 30-35% for benefits. That employee
is probably costing you pretty close to $19 to $20 and hour.
Vialet: That's very true. We tried to be a little bit generous with these figures
until we got this program up and rolling so that it's not a shock to the public
because they're not used to having these fees. So, we were trying to be a
little bit generous to see how this ran and maybe give us a little bit more room
in the future to change them to accommodate for those things.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Wee rd.
De Weerd: How will this be enforced? I know probably some of this should
be tied to a business license. How are you going to know about this? I guess
you only know about it through building permits and PI's but we'll realize a
number of people will fall through the cracks unless they're going for one or
the other.
Vialet: That's very true. Without a business license, we go on search and
destroy missions and if they don't file for a tenant improvement, a lot of times
in the older part of downtown Meridian, you have these existing older homes.
They just move in one day and you've got a new business. They could be
electroplating down in the basement and with all those heavy metals, that
does impact our sewage system. So, without them filing for a permit and no
business license, it's anybody's guess, unfortunately. So, if they file for
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 15 of 51
tenant improvement or a building permit of some kind, that's how we find
them. Business licenses would definitely help us in this aspect There's no
doubt about it I hope that answered your question.
De Weerd: Kind of. Have you narrowed the list of businesses that you want
licenses for?
Vialet: Well, we can't, really, because, for an example, there's a donut shop
back east and they went to go and inspect it because they're discharging fats,
oils, and grease. The gal said well, what does this door go to and he said oh,
that just goes into my other room and she said well, what do you do in that
other room and he said oh, I electroplate all the chrome stuff, do all the
chroming for all the display racks and she's like, you what? So, without
knowing to the full extent of what every business does, we have no idea.
They could be manufacturing cosmetics and that's fine but they could also
need to be permitted because they're discharging so much more waste. The
criteria is derived from EPA, that tells you who has to be permitted. In order
for us to get to that point, we need to know what people are doing in their
businesses and we don't know right now. So, it's just kind of-we do a
survey every two years. We get every name out of the phone book. We go
pretty much door to door. When we're out driving around, we make a list of
every single business and their address and we start canvassing them that
way.
De Weerd: So, I imagine, we'll see something come up with the business
license in the near future maybe?
Vialet: I hope.
Corrie: We've talked about this a long time. Maybe we'll get it done. We
have enough people who want to do it I think so. I'd like to see it myself, just
certain ones, so you can have these things not slipping through the cracks.
It's pretty costly when they do. Any other questions?
Watson: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Yes.
Watson: Thank you. At this point, we just wanted to bring this up for
discussion. I think the next step would be to schedule the resolution for
adoption. The one thing that [ forgot to point out is that most of these fees
that I've brought to you, we've had a revenue projection, we're really only
projecting about 10% of the pre-treatment program would be funded by these
fees at this point Just like the Public Works review and inspection fees, we
want to get this in place for a year, see how it functions, see what the
problems are, find out what the actual revenues are and update as
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 16 of 51
necessary. This by no means is intended to fund the whole pre-treatment
program.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols, correct me if I'm wrong, but this will take a public hearing,
is that correct?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. These are new fees and,
therefor, they would require a public hearing. They satisfy that definition of
being more than 5%. If I may ask a question of Brad and Celeste. I see this
resolution, and now I know why I remember seeing some of these numbers
before or at least the categories. We did this quite awhile ago. Have the
numbers changed from-I can't really tell from the draft copy. It didn't come
through the fax machine very well.
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council members, and Mr. Nichols. I don't think they've
changed at all.
Nichols: Okay. Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. If you just let us know,
obviously, when the hearing is going to be sufficiently in advance ahead of
time, we'll have a resolution prepared along the lines of the proposed fees
and, of course, we can modify those if after the public hearing you change
any of those fees. We can at least have a draft ready to go.
Corrie: Okay. Does Council wish to have the City Clerk set up a public
hearing time on this? Mr. Clerk, if you'll set a date as close as you can for a
public hearing on this one.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: One thing that has been helpful in the past, Brad, is when you
show us also what surrounding communities are doing, kind of a comparison
chart. If you could do that, it would be helpful, especially, at the public
hearing.
Watson: Sure. I'm sure Celeste would be able to get her hands on that very
quickly. We can do that.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Watson: Thank you.
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 17 of 51
Corrie: All right. The next item moved from the consent agenda is Item A,
which was tabled from April 23rd, 2002, order granting appeal AP 01-00 stop
work order at 2340 W. Franklin Road by Walt Morrow. So, we will hear that
one now. I guess we can start with Walt. Walt, do you want to start? 1'm
trying to review this in all this time and maybe you can bring us up to what
we're doing here and by the staff and comments too.
Morrow: I'm Walt Morrow, 2340 W. Franklin Road in Meridian. Where we're
at here is this project has been delayed at my request until now. Where we
left the project in November was, essentially, that in terms of the history of the
thing, I had submitted plans and specs for a building permit, the same
process that I had used with four other building permits over the last 20 years
at this location. We picked up a building permit October 2yth of 1999, started
construction in 2001, ten months later, had a stop work order for extensively
p & Z issues. We did (inaudible) our first meeting between myself and the
Council and had discussion concerning those issues with the Council on
October 2nd, did approve the rescinding of the stop work order and the project
to go ahead and proceed. At that particular time-I'm sorry. A couple of
meetings later, with the Findings of Facts and Conclusions came out for
approval, there were several incorrect areas in that and I asked for those to
be corrected. Then, Councilman Anderson asked questions with respect to
Fire Department issues. I was not able to answer those questions in terms of
the plan review process. We had scheduled another meeting (inaudible)
appeared and answered the Councils questions with respect to the process
that he used. He indicated that the process had not included Skip, in terms of
Skip reviewing those plans and specs for that project. The following meeting,
it was determined that Councilman Anderson wanted a review by the Fire
Department, which I agreed to. Then, from that point on, I had asked for the
issue to be tabled until now. So, that's the history of where we've been.
Where we're at now is the Fire Department did issue a plan review. The plan
review is based on an industrial building. The reality is that the requirements
of the USC and their classification of the building are different than the
requirements for the Fire Department and their classification of the building. It
is a building that is not to be used other than by me. It's not for rent, not for
lease, not for sale. It's a storage building for things that I currently have
stored on my property that are out in the elements. The review by the Fire
Department, apparently, they weren't aware that the building already exists
on the site in terms of structural things that they're suggesting and the review
is not possible. It's a pre-engineered steel building. It's a package and it is
there. There were issues raised about water. There is no City water within
that location. There's no storage capacity for water. So, those were the
issues that were raised by the review of the Fire Department. Where we're at
for tonight is to answer questions that the Council may have of me.
Obviously, the staff, if there's a representative from the Fire Department here,
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 18 of 51
he can review or answer questions that you may have in terms of their review
of the project. So, having said that, are there any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Walt, have you read the order granting appeal overruling Planning
and Zoning Director's denial of application. The last one says 10-02-01.
Morrow: Yes.
Corrie: Okay.
Morrow: That was the night that the Council passed the appeal and then the
Findings of Facts and Conclusions came a couple two or three weeks later.
There were some things on those that were inaccurate that I requested to be
changed and subsequently were.
Corrie: I guess the question is, do you or do you not agree with the
comments and requirements? It sounds like you don't.
Morrow: I don't agree, very candidly. From one perspective, the building was
bought and paid for and delivered to the job site so there's nothing from a
structural engineering standpoint that can be done to qualify in terms of
construction. The building has divider walls and an area of separation. On
agricultural, if it's classified as an agricultural usage building, then the
requirements are remarkably different from an industrial building. I think it
was also stated by Don Whitman, that in the County this particular type of
project is not even permitted through a permit process for agricultural stuff.
We can't do to the building what some of the suggestions are with respect to
the Fire Department makes. It's physically impossible to do. As everyone
knows, there's no City water at this location and I think the implication by their
rating that there's a 40,000 gallon storage or pool of water. That's not a
possible thing to do either.
Corrie: Is that zoned RUT or is that-no, that's City limits.
Morrow: That's City limits. Remember, it's zoned light industrial. It's
agricultural by grandfather rights and by usage.
Corrie: Okay. Any other questions from Council?
De Weerd: We probably need to hear from staff.
Corrie: Yes, we will. [will have someone get you back here. All right. Staff
comments, please.
i
Meridian City Council Meel",g
July 23,2002
Page 19 of 51
Watson: Shari, do you want to start? Or Joe?
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I could add a little bit of history to
it. The building permit was received without any review by the Planning and
Zoning department. Part of Mr. Whitman's response to that was because he
considered it an agricultural building. Our response was that it was not an
agricultural zone. Everything on there is already non-conforming so, therefor,
any expansion of that use would have to be done through a Conditional Use
Permit. It was initially brought to our attention by the Fire Chief, Kenny
Bowers, who's father lives out near there and he wanted to know why they
received a permit for that when they had no water out there. So, the stop
work order was put on the building because there was no fire flow for a
building of that size. The use wasn't permitted. There was no certificate of
zoning compliance. It did not meet what our ordinance would require in terms
of a building permit for landscaping or setbacks or those types of things.
Initially, it came down to the Council only wanted to consider the life safety
issues of the building and that's why they had the Fire Department do their
review and come up with their response to the issuance of the permit. That's
kind of where it stayed. I guess Mr. Silva has some comments as well.
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I wanted to just kind of brief you
on the plan review that had been requested that I perform on the project. The
project was already underway when I came on board as the Fire Marshall.
Two different things. I was requested to review it as, if it was in the City, there
was one thing-what I wanted to clarify is that it was plan reviewed as a
storage building and not as an industrial building, as Mr. Morrow had
indicated. So, it was never indicated to us it was going to be used for
anything other than as a storage building so that was how it was plan
reviewed, in a light industrial setting. That would require a single fire hydrant,
given the type of construction. Another option that was provided to Mr.
Morrow for consideration was whether or not, if it was treated in fact as an
agricultural building, a farm storage building, whether or not we could take an
approach similar to what we do in the county, where we have a stand-alone
agricultural building where water supply is just provided on site in the form of
a tank. We categorized the building, quote unquote, as a farm storage
building used for dairy barns and equipment (inaudible), which I felt was an
appropriate classification for the building. That would be another option of on-
site storage if it didn't seem feasible at all to extend water to the site. So,
essentially, that's what the plan review process was all about with some other
miscellaneous requirements but that was the gist of the plan review that was
conducted by the Fire Department on the project.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
I
Meridian City Council Meetlllg
July 23,2002
Page 20 of 51
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: So, Joe, if we deal with it like it's a rural building, an agricultural
building and these are in your memo are the requirements you would ask of
any storage unit like this would have to comply with?
Silva: Correct. Within the City limits, typically, this project would be classified
as a storage facility, which is what Mr. Morrow had indicated, and would
require one fire hydrant within 500 feet of the project.
De Weerd: Now, if I remember right, when Councilman Anderson had
brought this up, his concern was also if we don't put out these requirements,
the City would be liable in case of a fire, in case anything happened. Is that-
is my recall correct?
Silva: Correct. A couple of things. One of the issues that potentially could
come up is that when Mr. Morrow approaches his insurance agent for
insurance, one of the concerns that they will express in all likelihood will be
the availability of fire hydrants in close proximity within acceptable, you know,
300 to 400 to 500 feet of the project. So, that would be one question that
would probably be posed to Mr. Morrow once he completed the project
(inaudible). The insurance probably would pose the question of what's the
available water supply for that project. That's going to be the concern
downstream that will have to be dealt with. The other issue, quite possibly,
would be the setting of a precedent where a commercial building, as
considered by Planning and Zoning, is granted a building permit for a project
within the City without available water supply, municipal service.
De Weerd: But, what is our liability in case of a fire? I can't remember. I
didn't bring my file tonight on all of the discussion we've had already on this
but it seems to me that Councilman Anderson's primary concern was the
City's liability if we approve this, what we are actually liable for.
Silva: Potentially, we have adopted a fire code in the City and we would be
caught in the situation where we had plan reviewed a project and not followed
those guidelines that had been established by previous Councils when the
uniform fire code, the 1997 Uniform Fire Code, which is the fire code cu rrently
in place in the City, we would not be following our own rules and we have a
project here that it's been brought to our attention where we have not stood
by those requirements as the project has gone through the City process.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
Meridian City Council Mee\II,g
July 23, 2002
Page 21 of 51
De Weerd: I guess I have a question for Walt. The Fire Department is giving
you two different options. One, if we treat this as a building that applies to the
City ordinances versus the rural water supply. Can you do either? I know we
can't get a fire hydrant out there. We don't have the water flow. But, can you
do the rural water supply requirements that he has outlined in his memo?
Morrow: I think his memo indicates 40,000 gallons. It's a huge water
reservoir. Very candidly, there's a couple of issues here. One is that my
insurance man rates the building simply as rural. There's not an issue with
the location of a fire hydrant, in terms of that. It's a ratings issue. The second
issue is that this very building that you're sitting in has a variance from the
Uniform Fire Code. So, there's more than ample precedence for that. It was
done by the Council when this building was built. So, there's ample
precedence. I think the building is now some ten or twelve years old. So,
that type of thing has been used before by the Council to handle these issues.
Quite candidly, I don't know what a 40,000 gallon storage facility would cost,
whether it's an in the ground facility or above ground facility. I can't tell you
the answer to that. I know that 40,000 gallon milk silos are very expensive.
De Weerd: Well, if this is a requirement that they put on anyone who is
putting up a rural or agricultural use, why are we exempting one property
and-why don't we just change the code, if it's not practical to do?
Morrow: Well, I would suggest to you, that there are plenty of indoor riding
arenas and stuff like that that are two and three times the size of this building
that have neither sprinkler systems or fire storage or whatever. They're all
through the county. I can't answer your question. I don't know how that's
handled. It may vary from fire district to fire district but that's the reality.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Go ahead.
Corrie: I was going to say, we're talking about what Mr. Anderson said back
on August 21st of 2001, he said, in my opinion, we're not absolved from still
having that liability if there's a fife safety issue there. He didn't want the
building permits granted even after the building was built, has been there ten
years, that issue doesn't go away. We're still responsible for it. I think you
were asking what his verbiage was there. Mr. Bird.
Bird: Joe, is this the same requirements that if we have a dairy farm come in
or anything like this that they have to, and the rural transition within our
(
Meridian City Council Meer" Il,)
July 23, 2002
Page 22 of 51
impact area, that you've covered, do you require 40,000 gallon tank out there
on a dairy farm?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Bird. That would be correct. This would
be the uniform requirement if we were approached with a similar project in the
rural. We've classified it as a farm storage building, which that's the
indication that Mr. Morrow had indicated the use was going to be. That would
be the requirement for it. For example, at the Shaeffer View Estates project
off Meridian Road, they just put in a 30,000-galJon water tank underground
and we're in the final stages of accepting that water supply for a series of
single family homes. I believe there's about 20 lots there. I'm not sure about
the number of lots but that's approximately the number of lots in that
subdivision.
Bird: Yes, but, you're talking about a residential living thing against a storage
place that you have maternity cows. You might be in there one or two hours
a day at the most. You've got a storage in there that you're going to be in and
out of. It isn't as if somebody is living or working in there. 40,000 gallons is a
lot of water. I can understand it if you're out in a subdivision that has this and
you're going to have families living in a house and you don't have water. J
disagree with Mr. Anderson on the point of liability on the City. If that's the
truth, everyone of these old buildings or that's been passed under the code
without going, that don't have panics on every exit door or don't have this, the
City's liable and I don't think they are. I think that if Mr. Morrow was going to
set a shop up in there, have occupants in it. I would have no problem with it
because I understand, his application, about 50% to 60% of it is going to be
for a maternity ward for his calves and cows and the other is going to be
storage for his equipment. I don't believe he's going to run an office or
anything out of it. That's something you guys can check quite a bit, I think.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. Morrow, I guess one of the things I didn't hear or didn't see in the
information is what's your alternative? I mean, what do you propose to do?
Nothing?
Morrow: There is no alternative. We have a situation where it's not
economically feasible, obviously, to extend water and so on and so forth. The
40,OOO-gallon capacity, in terms of storage, quite candidly, I don't know that
that's even feasible. I don't know that it isn't but the whole concept of the
building was, had the requirements been there in the first place when it went
through the process, I would not have built the building. That makes the
building way too expensive for the purposes that it's going to serve. It just
Meridian City Councll Meellll!,)
July 23, 2002
Page 23 of 51
doesn't make sense to spend, at that point, almost $200,000 to store stuff.
You can rent a lot of square footage for a long, long time for that kind of
money.
Nary: So, would it be fair to say, Mr. Morrow, I guess, your concern or your
beef here is the fact that these requirements are being imposed after the fact,
after you were given the building permit, after you were already in the design
and plan and everything else. If you had been told these up front, you surely
would have altered the design, altered your plans, or done something
differently.
Morrow: I wouldn't have built the building, wouldn't have even come close.
Nary: Okay. Thank you.
Morrow: Other questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
v
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess just one. If you are to provide a water supply in case of a
fire, what are your plans? You don't have any plans?
Morrow: I'm not sure I understand the question.
De Weerd: Do you have plans to have water available to fight a fire if it
should happen?
Morrow: The answer would be no, not at this time. It would be the same as
the building immediately to the west of me that's approximately the same
square footage that has no water source either.
De Weerd: That's Maple Grove RV.
Morrow: Maple Grove RV. That building was built some ten years ago and
was permitted by (inaudible) concrete and (inaudible) who builtthe building.
De Weerd: That was approved by the County.
Morrow: No. That was approved by the City. That's been in the City since
1980.
De Weerd: And it was built after it was put in the City?
Meridian City Council Meellllg
Jury 23, 2002
Page 24 of 51
Morrow: Yes, about ten years ago.
De Weerd: Did we not have a uniform fire code at that time?
Corrie: We did.
De Weerd: And we ignored it then?
Corrie: We also refused to let the RV do any more building or anything else
with their Conditional Use Permit because of the fire-
Morrow: I think part of what the testimony, Bob, was that he was asking to
weld and do other kinds of light manufacturing processes within the building.
Corrie: But, he was also asking for a CUP to sell trailers and that and
because of the water supply and that, he still couldn't get it. I mean, I'm trying
to find a correlation here. You don't have water, if you have a fire in your
house and if we allow this, you don't have water, if you have a fire at that
shed and lose your house, you're still not going to save your house. We're
getting in deeper here, to me.
Morrow: I've already been through that process once.
Corrie: I know you have. To me, if you're in the City limits and that's the
ruling now, if you're in the City limits why don't we follow the City rules. I'm
finding it hard to understand. Yes, you're going to use it for a calving barn but
if there's a fire there, we've got to be able to put it out. (inaudible)
Morrow: If there's a fire there now, it's the same situation.
Corrie: You're in the City limits now.
Morrow: I know I'm in the City limits.
Corrie: You're building in the City limits and it's a new building. Do we need
to go by our present codes now since it's being built now, rather than ignoring
them and let it go ahead and be built without fire protection? For me, I don't
see that it's a good thing for us or you, either.
Morrow: I understand what you're saying but the point is that it was all
approved and construction began under the criteria by which it was approved.
The precedence is also that the building of approximately the same size
immediately to the west of me was built ten years ago with the same criteria.
Once again, had I known that the cost of the building was going to be driven
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 25 of 51
up by additional requirements at the very front end, the project would have
been dropped at that point
Corrie: Did you not ask what the requirements were now as far as building
that building?
Morrow: This was the fifth building permit that I submitted for on that
property. I've had four permits there before through three different mayoral
administrations. The requirements have come back the same each and every
time. The current building department issued three of those, what would be
five permits.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Walt, what is the construction on the building? What is it? Is it block,
steel, or what?
Morrow: It's a combination of block and steel.
Bird: Block four feet high and steel on up?
Morrow: That's correct
Bird: Wood or steel rafters?
Morrow: It's all steel.
Bird: All steel rafters. Any sheet rock?
Morrow: The divider walls are steel, two by six studs, with sheet rock, five
eighths sheet rock on each side.
Bird: Double sheet rock? Five eighths inch fire rated?
Morrow: I believe what he called for was five eighths sheet rock on each
side, one layer.
Bird: And all the way to the roof?
Morrow: All the way to the pan, the (inaudible) pan.
Bird: Joe, on a construction like that, what is going to burn? Are you putting
any insulation in the steel part of it?
Meridian City Council Meetlllg
July 23,2002
Page 26 of 51
Morrow: That's correct. It's insulated under the skin, the steel skin.
Bird: Is that flammable? Joe, what is the track record on those kind of
buildings for fire?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Bird. Typically, it's quite obvious that steel
doesn't burn, per se. The contents, which can be very variable and be some
very high dollar farm equipment, for example, and some of the livestock that
may be present. I'm not familiar with the going price per pound but I mean,
those are the type things that the contents do in fact burn and they do cause
significant losses. We had a hay fire, for example, just the other day in Kuna.
There was $250,000 loss in just hay outside. I know that Mr. Morrow has,
you know, antique vehicles and I'm sure that may be one thing he may store
there. I'm not sure, whatever he deems appropriate for his storage building.
But, those are high dollar items and those things do in fact burn because
some of the components are petro-chemicals or they're, you know, equipment
that Mr. Morrow may choose to store as a result of his business and
construction. I mean, just miscellaneous construction things that do in fact
burn. I agree with you, the building is, in fact, not going to burn. We refer to it
as a type three non-rated.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Walter, are you going to have heating in it?
Morrow: No.
Bird: What kind of electrical?
Morrow: Just lights and 110.
Bird: 110? Any plumbing?
Morrow: No. Well, some water spigots for water troughs.
Bird: Well, for the interior but you're not going to have sewer, water and
sewer.
Morrow: No. There's no sewer out there. It stops at Interstate 84.
Bird: I forgot about that. Lights would be the only thing electrical you'd have
in there. Some plug ins, I'm sure.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 27 of 51
Morrow: Lights and some plug ins for water heaters.
Bird: No 220? Nothing for welding?
Morrow: No. No welding.
Bird: Okay.
McCandless: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: Will your home and your office out there, they're supplied water
by a well? Is it a well?
Morrow: That's correct. It's a four-inch well.
McCandless: It's what?
Morrow: It's a four-inch well. A four-inch well, when they converted to water,
that was the biggest they built. Now, you can do six-inch wells for domestic
stuff. It's a four inch well and a half horse power pump.
McCandless: So, your building is too far away to be serviced by that well.
Morrow: Well, it would have a spigot, you know, frost free hydrants inside the
building that would come from that well. Does that answer your question?
The four inch well was probably drilled somewhere in the last 40's, early 50's.
In terms of our sewer system out there, we still have the original outhouse on
the property.
McCandless: Okay.
Morrow: And it's nice. But, having said that, the well is only 48 inches deep.
It has a half horse-power pump, ten gallon per minute capability. The static
water level is at 28 feet. So, it's capable of supplying domestic needs and
that's about it. That's what it was designed for.
McCandless: So, there would be no chance of making that well deeper or
putting in a higher pump or something of that sort so that could service more
on the property? Your building that we're talking about.
Morrow: Well, the building that we're talking about would just have one line
coming off of an existing line and have frost free hydrant for water supply to
Meridian City Council Meelll,g
July 23, 2002
Page 28 of 51
stock water and that kind of thing. In terms of increasing the capacity of the
well, no. I don't know that there's even equipment that's capable of extending
four-inch wells. I think everything now, the minimum size is six-inch wells,
which would cost to drilling an entirely new well system. My neighbor across
the street just did one and they were at 128 feet with a six-inch well and that
was for domestics. If this well were to go bad and I have to drill a new well,
then I would drill a six-inch well to a domestic water level, which would be
about the same as the neighbor across the street.
McCandless: Well, that still wouldn't service your outbuildings.
Morrow: Well, it would give them water. Are you asking me would it be
capable of putting out 40,000 gallons? I guess I'm not understanding your
question.
McCandless: I'm just asking if that would solve the problem that you have out
there with no water to control fire or something of that sort.
Morrow: The answer to that question would be no. No well of the six-inch
capacity at 128 feet is capable of creating fire flows that are 2,000 gallons per
minute and those kinds of things. Those take industrial wells, which are
typically, in our case in the City of Meridian, 750 feet deep. They're twelve
inches in diameter and multi-horse power pumps.
McCandless: Okay. That's what I wanted to know.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I just have one more question, Mr. Morrow. Did I understand you
earlier when you first started that all of the material that you're storing in this
building already is on your property and it's already stored outside on your
property?
Morrow: That's correct, with the exception of some furniture that we use in
model homes from time to time for display purposes and that stuff comes in
and out. It's currently stored at Merchant's Moving and Storage and at
another facility on Commercial, 2212 Commercial out here in Meridian.
Nary: Thank you.
Morrow: Any further questions?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 29 of 51
Corrie: Any other questions, Council? Any questions from staff? Okay.
Discussion.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess since I'm the latecomer to the party, I'll at least see what
(inaudible) of what the information that we have but it sounds to me that Mr.
Morrow acquired this building permit and I think this has identified an issue
that we have wrestled with a number of times on other projects as well. He
did secure his building permit to build this building. As he said, this review is
after his permit was issued, after his plans had already been submitted. All of
that was done and then this fire review was done. It, essentially, sounds like
at Councilman Anderson's request to get that done. I think it probably should
have been done but it wasn't and we gave him a permit. We annexed this
property that doesn't have water capacity to meet this need. We have
basically allowed the same type of uses in the area. This material is all there
on his property now. If it were to catch on fire now, which is probably a higher
likelihood since it's outside, we have no water capability to put it out. We
have no water capability for the buildings adjacent for the same reason. I
mean, I agree with what Mr. Mayor said originally. I'm not in favor of always
granting exceptions and variances and things like that but I understand Mr.
Morrow's dilemma. He came and asked for his permit, we reviewed it and
gave it to him and after the fact, we came and reviewed it and said, oh, wait a
minute, don't build it, we don't have fire capacity out there. I think he honestly
told us and I believe him, that he wouldn't have built this building if they had
told him that. Once we gave him a building permit, he has a property right
that he had a right to go forward on. I don't see that he's at fault. I
understand our process just didn't work as ideally as we would have liked
because I do think this information should have been told to him before we
gave him a permit. I don't necessarily agree with former Councilman
Anderson, that we necessarily have some increased liability to the City if we
were to grant this but I don't see how we penalize Mr. Morrow after the fact In
imposing these requirements upon him after we've issued him a building
permit. I think that's really the key here, to me. We gave him a permit, he
went forward and then we said stop because we've realized that part of our
plan review process wasn't done prior to the issuance of a permit. We've
wrestled with that issue on a number of other cases and I think this just
happens to be one of them as well. So, I guess, what I'm understanding is,
what Mr. Morrow is asking, is to amend these Findings of Facts and
Conclusions to eliminate the fire requirements from these findings. Now, I
don't know whether or not process wise he still needs to have a variance or if
he doesn't need anything. I don't know. I don't see any reason to penalize
him when-
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 30 of 51
*** End of Side Two ***
McCandless: Joe, what is the procedure when you get a building permit as to
fire inspection? Why wasn't the fire inspection done before Councilman
Anderson asked for it?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilwoman McCandless. I can't answer that. I was
requested by Councilman Anderson to perform a plan review. This project
was already initiated when I came aboard as the Fire Marshall. Ordinarily,
the process, when we're dealing with a building with absolutely nothing built
and I'll explain that in just one second, we get a set of plans that are sent over
to the Fire Department for a plan review. The plan review goes back to the
Building Department and it is issued and made an attachment to the
approved set of plans that goes out to the project that the project manager
utilizes to guide the project through the process. In this case, I believe what
happened is, that this building was treated as an accessory building, as an
accessory use, and that was apparently how it was not plan reviewed by the
Fire Department and the project got initiated. We got in the situation we are
in today. Occasionally, we've tended improvements. That being interior walls
of an existing building, you know, interior modification of interior walls. Those
projects are so numerous that go through City staff that those are not plan
reviews. We do, occasionally, run into issues where the Fire Department
goes out on a final inspection out there where we don't have an opportunity to
see a set of plans. We're not even aware of the project in progress and we
are expected to go there and do a final inspection and we become aware of
several issues, some significant occasionally, that are existing out there that
we have to act upon and try to straighten out at the tail end of the project. It's
just unfortunately how the process works, given the volume of tentative
improvements and new buildings going in to the City. That's basically,
currently, how the process works.
McCandless: I guess my question is, what happened to Walt, wouldn't
happen today? Would that be a fair assumption?
Silva: When you're going out to build a building that does not exist even in
the form of a shell, we get a set of building plans from the Building
Department that we are expected to conduct a plan review on. Ordinarily,
they are sent over to the Fire Department for plan review. Apparently, this
building was deemed as an accessory building and not a significant project or
a significant change in the amount of fire load present on that building site
and that's why it did not go through the ordinary process of a plan review by
the Fire Department.
McCandless: Well, what would you call it, if it was not an accessory building?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 31 of 51
Silva: Then, it would be as Mr. Morrow has indicated during our discussion,
said it's a storage building within the City, which the expectation there is that
it's going to have municipal services i.e. water supply and sewer. It would be
expected to have those things in place as a part of the approval of the project.
McCandless: Thank you.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess, originally, we overturned the Planning and Zoning
Administrator's stop work order or denial of application for the very reasons
that Councilman Nary suggested. You know, it was an internal issue. He
was granted a building permit without the sign-off of Planning and Zoning and
the Fire Department. Why is-it was an oversight or Don Whitman suggested
it, you know. He didn't think it warranted it. Councilman Anderson thought
different, you know, our staff thinks different but the building is underway. It's
sitting there without-I mean, there's quite an investment there. So, you
sympathize on that. My only question is, will the City have any liability in this?
We can't look back and we can't look at it in terms of well, we've let people do
it before. We've kind of taken a stand and trying to draw a line in the sand
that we won't continue to do things wrong just because we've done them
before. We have codes. We have to uphold them. This one has gone too
far. But, my only question is, are we liable? I thought that's why this has
been continued forever and ever. I'd like an answer. Are we liable? If we're
not, let's move on this or not.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I did some research on this. J
wasn't able to find any Idaho cases that held, or at least appellate level cases,
that held the City liable for approving-there were some references to
approvals where building codes were not followed. I think you also have to
look at a number of issues in relationship to this building beyond the fire code
requirements that Deputy Fire Chief Mr. Silva suggested. One is that Mr.
Morrow has agreed to limit the use of the building. There are some things
that are in these findings and order that would limit the uses. That certainly
minimizes the potential for liability. I can't say that there won't be any
possibility of liability. My crystal ball isn't that good. You can look at the type
of construction. You can look at what the building is going to be used for.
You can look at the type of restrictions that are placed on future uses of the
building. It may not be that long before you have water running down that
road, with issues related to the Ten Mile interchange study, sewer projects,
Meridian City Council Meet'"IJ
July 23, 2002
Page 32 of 51
water. This is an area that's zoned industrial and has been for a long time
and people that built north of the railroad tracks know or should have known
that it was industrial use. If they looked at the pasture, it's one of the areas of
town that is potential to develop industrially. I don't know if that exactly
answers your question but, I mean, that's my perspective on it.
De Weerd: Now, when we get sewer and water there, because he is in the
City, he'l[ be required to hook up. Correct?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. There's a City ordinance that
says that if water and sewer is within a certain footage and if you're in it, then
you do have to connect. Since he's right on Franklin Road, of course, there
would most likely be a fire hydrant within the required footage to this
structure. I believe, and Deputy Chief Silva can correct me if I'm wrong, but I
believe that the fire hydrant would solve the fire flow question and solve this
fire code dilemma because there would be that source of water there.
De Weerd: Is there appropriate language that we can put in these findings
with the agreement of Mr. Morrow of hooking up when it's available and that
he releases any liability to the City of Meridian in case of a fire? You know, I
just want to-I know you haven't found any cases and I really don't think that
Mr. Morrow would hold the City liable but I do think since that issue was
raised, it's not an issue we should ignore.
Nichols: Councilwoman De Weerd, Mayor and members of the Council. It
can be written in to the findings that Mr. Morrow will issue a release of liability.
I mean to tell you, though, that that is not the end of the story because if
somebody else gets hurt or somebody else has some property in there or
some of those issues, that's just not the end of the story. That might bind Mr.
Morrow and it might be a recordable document that might bind someone to
whom he sells this property in some fashion but it's not the kind of thing that I
would-I mean, it would be great if you could get it but I wouldn't necessarily
think that that's the end of the issue on that part of it. As far as writing in a
requirement that he hook up when the water and sewer or just the water
alone, is really the issue. The sewer is not an issue with regard to this
particular question. So, that he connect to City water supply would be
sufficient to resolve the issue as long as there's that hydrant within the
required minimum linear distance. Mr. Mayor, I believe Mrs. Stiles has a
question or something.
Corrie: Mrs. Stiles.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I just wanted to know, as far as
the occupancy, Daunt will be the only one that will be able to sign that
occupancy because the Planning and Zoning Department and the Fire
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 33 of 51
Department will not be able to sign off on that. I don't know if that helps with
the liability issue or not. The occupancy certificate would have to be issued
with only the Building Department's signature.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: It would seem to me on this particular issue that the only language we
may want to include in this order is that pursuant to the City Code, he's going
to have to hook to water when it is available. If there isn't a hydrant within the
required distance, that he may have to provide fire safety requirements at that
point. I agree with Mr. Nichols, on Franklin Road the likelihood of that is
pretty small. I don't think it's necessarily reasonable-I don't know that we
ask anybody else to give us a waiver to approve their permit. I think what we
may want to include in the language is that he recognizes at this time that
there is no water service there. I think we have required that or we have put
that in development agreements before that they recognize that at this
juncture, we have no sewer and water service to the site, that the risk is
theirs. Certainly, if there is a fire and someone sues us, although it is a fairly
remote possibility, we certainly are going to say, I think you need to talk to Mr.
Morrow about that, not us. We'll have to figure that out at that juncture. I
mean, I just don't see that we have-and the reason, I guess, just to be clear,
the only reason I raise the other property that are adjacent, wasn't as good a
reason to grant a variance. It was that the risk to us is no different. If we
have risk at all, we already have it. So, it isn't that that was the reason to do
it. It was simply that-I don't know that there is any increased risk anyway
but that was my only point. Other than-that type of language, which I think
we could direct Mr. Nichols to prepare some other language and take out this
other stuff regarding the fire safety things and putting that in, I think would be
adequate.
De Weerd: I could live with that.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I almost believe that with the agreement that that group of people along
that area when they were annexed, have got an agreement that once water
and sewer is available that they will hook up to it. I'd be real shocked if they
don't.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 34 of 51
Nary: Yes. My thought was-just a reference, if there's a City Code that's
available to reference, we'd certainly include that reference that that's already
existing.
Morrow: My point here would be that I don't have any problem at all with it if
the water is being brought down Franklin Road, at my cost I would install the
necessary fire hydrants that service my 600 and some lineal feet of property
that I own. If the water line is coming by, feel free in the document to obligate
me to put in, I think it's probably, every 450 feet, that would be two fire
hydrants within my property line. I don't have a problem with that. I
recognize that the responsibility is solely mine. I have no problem with that
either. It's no different than it is today.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Mr. Morrow, before you get too
far from the microphone, as I look at Deputy Chief Silva's requirements that
are in the current draft of the findings, the only issues [ think that may be
burdensome are Items A and B. A is the public water supply required. We
could probably amend that to indicate that there's no water there now and
when the water is available on Franklin Road, Mr. Morrow has agreed to
install a hydrant within the required depth. Under Item 2, options to reduce
that requirement, that's the one that has the-let's see here. It talks about
walls and structural members and the rural water supply. So, it would be that
next part that talks about the 40,250 gallons stored in an approved manner. I
think that's what I'm hearing the Council might want to take out. The other
things are an address on the building visible from the road, fire extinguishers,
storage not to exceed twelve feet in height, ceiling clearance at least two feet.
Morrow: All of those issues, Mr. Nichols, are fine. They're standard types of
things. The property address, all 17 % acres, is 2340. There are already
street numbers that exceed the five-inch minimum on both the existing house
and mailbox.
Nichols: Okay. Then, Mr. Mayor, also a required item was if it were ever
going to be used for another purpose that then, there would have to be a
Conditional Use Permit and all fire codes would have-
Morrow: No. There wouldn't be a Conditional Use Permit because it's an
industrial zone. I think that what the discussion was by Mr. Whitman was, is
that at any time it changed, then there would be building permits issued for a
change of usage. I think also, if you'll look, that I testified that the building
was designed and the materials and the quality of the materials were
,
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 35 of 51
designed and built so that at some point in the future it could change to
industrial use, at such time, services became available. Certainly, at that time
and through that process, any tentative improvements or changes in the
building, predicated by a change in usage, would be done through the normal
building permit process. Such as, we do tentative improvements in buildings
that we build within the City now.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Morrow is correct. I wasn't reading it well enough but
it talks about a certificate of zoning compliance, commercial application
reviews to be followed including fire codes, if there's some change in the use.
Bird: Mayor, I think Shari's got a question.
Corrie: Shari.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council. Any other project of this type would require a
Conditional Use Permit. It's more than one building on a lot and this is a non-
conforming use. It has, you know-the only uses there now are-there's
already a house, single family dwelling. There's an office building. This
would be turned into some type of industrial building similar to the one Mr.
Morrow has built over in Lane Industrial Park. So, as far as Planning and
Zoning, we wouldn't be able to issue a certificate of zoning compliance,
should he come in for a building permit to change the use at a future time
without a Conditional Use Permit. I just wanted to make that clear.
Bird: (inaudible) discuss at this point. We can deal with that down the road
(inaudible).
Corrie: Those could be-
Morrow: I guess the issue there is if it's going to be changed at some point in
time to industrial use and it's an industrial zone property and the use is an
approved use within the industrial zone, why would you need a Conditional
Use Permit?
Corrie: Well, honestly, I can't answer that.
Morrow: Well, neither can I.
Bird: We're not worrying about that right now.
Corrie: Well, you're right, Keith. We don't have to. It's just that I think-
Bird: Unless he's changed his permit already.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 36 of 51
Corrie: Yes, well, it's a-I don't know. A round peg in a square hole or
something. Okay.
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Nichols. Just a point of clarification. Mr. Morrow
was correct when he indicated that the average typical spacing of fire
hydrants is 500 feet. So, his project with 600-foot frontage would, in fact,
probably have two hydrants. You may want to make that one of your facts
and findings, I would suggest.
Bird: That's fine. When it gets there?
Silva: When municipal water supply becomes available. Correct. So, I don't
know if you want to include that in Mr. Nichols facts and findings but we'll find
out.
Corrie: Any other discussion?
De Weerd: What was that?
Corrie: Okay. Who wants to make a motion with all of this in it?
De Weerd: Bill.
Bird: Nary, we'll let you.
Corrie: An attorney telling another attorney how to write it.
De Weerd: He has such good verbiage.
Nary: Mr. Mayor, I guess I move the approval of the order granting appeal
overruling the Planning and Zoning Administrator's denial of application with
the following amendments, that our Council prepare some amended findings.
I guess we probably want to see them before we approve them but that
Section Three, in regards to the fire prevention issue, that the language be
changed to indicate when that service is available that the fire conditions
regarding public water supply will be met, that Mr. Morrow will hook to the City
water supply when it's available pursuant to the appropriate City Code, that
we would eliminate the condition regarding other alternative compliance with
the rural supply and the other information regarding the alternative ones, that
pursuant to City Code, that when available, the fire hydrants will be installed.
There appears to be two fire hydrants be installed on the frontage of his
property at his expense and there also be a statement in the findings that Mr.
Morrow recognizes that at this time that there is no water supply available and
does assume his own risk in using this building for storage as outlined in the
findings. I think it has the limitations already. I guess part of my motion is
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 37 of 51
once we approve the findings, which I guess will be a couple of weeks, that
we direct the Building Department Administrator to sign the certificate of
occupancy and allow this to get occupied and done with.
Bird: Second.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. As I drive by the buildings
several times a week, it's just at the foundation stage. It's not at the
certificate of occupancy stage.
Nary: Oh, okay. I'm sorry.
Bird: --issue the building permit. Re-issue the building permit.
Nary: I guess remove the stop work order and continue with the project. My
mistake. I'm sorry. Thank you. I don't think there was anything else. Would
two weeks be adequate, Mr. Nichols, for findings? August 6th?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Yes. We'll have the draft done
this week. I mean, we'll have it done this week. We just wait on your next
meeting.
Nary: We could probably put this in on our consent agenda on August 6th
unless there's some other question about it.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Yes.
Nary: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. There was a motion and a second made. Any further
discussion? Hearing none. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes. Hearing all
ayes. [t will be on the consent agenda in two weeks.
MOTION CARRIED
Corrie: Five minutes break and be back in five or ten minutes.
RECESS
Corrie: The next item on the agenda is the discussion of approval of tentative
Budget. Stacy.
Meridian City Council Meetlny
July 23, 2002
Page 38 of 51
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget: Approve
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council. I think Will has passed out to you the
totals that you'll need to approve for each fund for the budget. We also have
if you wanted to look again, at the final of what you appoved for each fund.
It's on the screen. That's the general fund. You'll notice the bottom number,
the increase the capital improvement fund number is $66,000. That
increased from where we were before because in the flurry of moving, when
we moved the dues to the P & Z, we didn't increase the general fund and we
should have done that. So, if you want to us to-I don't know how you would
like to do it, if you want us to move the screen up so you can just look at each
fund or each department, if you want to look at the enhancements. So, there
would be other government.
Corrie: I think we're probably pretty good. One thing I did want to-you did
mention about the senior citizen's center, giving them that extra $5,000. We
have to do it differently, don't we?
Kilchenmann: Yes. Maybe Mr. Nichols could address that question because
I believe it's a legal question.
Corrie: --about the senior citizen's, giving an extra $5,000. We can't do
(inaudible)
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. We need to do some research
into that particular Issue and I will get you a memo. I'm not prepared to
discuss it at this time but 1'1[ research it and get you something before the
budget hearing itself as to what can or can not be done.
Kilchenmann: We could always decrease the budget. We just can't increase
it.
De Weerd: Yes, we had talked about that afterwards, that the $5,000 could
be dedicated towards the van service. Kind of in our efforts for mass transit
or alternative transportation that, you know, since we helped them with their
van when they purchased it that it could be dedicated to insurance, fuel, and
just cost associated to the van. In your research, the attorney can kind of
look at that. That would be good.
Kilchenmann: So, do you want to review this again or do you want just
approve the-
Bird: I feel very comfortable with it, Mayor. We went over the budget real
well and it's setting here. She's got it broken out like this so we can publish it.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 39 of 51
We can be prepared when we have our public hearing. If we have to, we can
go into it at that point. I, myself, feel comfortable with it. I feel very
comfortable.
De Weerd: I haven't seen any hard paper copy or anything but if you could
give that to us in the meantime just to update our-
Kilchenmann: Yes, we could. It's just hot off of the press. In fact, she can
print it right now and give you copies.
De Weerd: Just by department, you know, notthe whole line item stuff.
Kilchenmann: Yes, that summary.
Bird: Yes.
Corrie: Okay. Mr. Bird.
Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we take this proposed fiscal year 2003 tentative
budget as presented tonight for publication before our public hearing on
August 22nd and get it published.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further
discussion?
De Weerd: Is this what we call, Mr. Mayor, blind faith?
Corrie: Well, yes. See no evil, hear no evil, and we speak the truth.
De Weerd: Did Tom stick his groundskeeper in there?
Bird: No, he didn't.
McCandless: This isn't U.S. Congress.
Bird: You can always take stuff out. You can't add to it.
Corrie: All those in favor of the motion say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23,2002
Page 40 of 51
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess before I said aye I should have asked but this includes
the conversation we had earlier with the code enforcement and the new
planner?
Corrie: Yes, it does.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. Next is the discussion of proposed exchange of surplus
property. Formef Fife Station on Meridian road for other property and cash.
Mr. Nichols.
7. Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus Property -- Former
Fire Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash:
Approve - set Public Hearing date
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Mr. Amos had to leave. You
have before you an exchange agreement, which has been signed by Mr.
Zimmerman on behalf of Farmer's and Merchant's State Bank. Just to review
what this agreement does, the Bank has acquired some parcels of property,
which are adjacent to the former Police facility over here on Idaho Avenue
and they propose to exchange those parcels-you don't have the agreement?
Bird: Yes, we have it but I don't know what I did with it.
Corrie: We had it before.
Nichols: Well, let me just go through it. Mr. Mayor and Members of Council.
I have one on my-maybe it's because it's my office copy. The gist of the
exchange agreement is that the City owns lots one through five in Block Two
of the amended plat of the original town site, which is the former Meridian
Road Fire Station. Well, up until the new facility was built on Franklin Road, it
was the Fire Station. The Bank is the owner of lots one, two, three, four, and
five of Block Two of the amended plat of Rowan Addition to Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho. The Bank's properties are valued at $237,731. The City's
property, the former fire station property, is valued at $260,000. The
proposed exchange calls for the Bank to exchange it's parcels as noted to the
City in exchange for the fire station parcel plus the Bank would also pay the
City an additional $22,269 in cash in order to equalize the value on the
exchange. The agreement is subject to approval by the City Council after
conducting the public hearing required by Idaho Code. It's an agreement,
essentially, to make the exchange if, in fact, after the public hearing you
decide it's in the best iNterest of the City to do so. Under the terms of the
Meridian City Council MeeUnfJ
July 23, 2002
Page 41 of 51
agreement, the Bank bears the expenses of closing, including title, insurance,
and recording fees and that sort of thing. Again, the agreement is contingent
upon affirmative action of the City Council after a public hearing as required
by Idaho Code 50-1402 and 50-1403. So, if you authorize the Mayor to sign
and the Clerk to attest, the next thing that happens is a public hearing is
scheduled, there is a summary of action taken by the Council, which is
published by the Clerk, which references what is supposed to take place,
notifies the public of the date and time and place of the public hearing and
then at the hearing, if the Councilor after the hearing, if the Council decides
to proceed with the exchange, then there will need to be an ordinance
adopted, which authorizes the exchange. An ordinance or a resolution. I've
got to double-check that. It may be just a resolution but there will need to be
a formal action taken by the Council.
Corrie: Okay. So, we need a public hearing, correct? The next thing after
we approve for me to sign and the Clerk to attest, set a public hearing.
Nichols: That's correct, Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Do you publish it-how soon can the public hearing be heard?
Nary: It says 15 days?
Corrie: 14 days but count backwards. You're good at that Will.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I would expect that probably
the soonest would be the third Tuesday in August.
Corrie: So, it would be the 20th of August. Okay.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Get this up for discussion. I would move that we approve the proposed
exchange of surplus property with Farmer's and Merchant's Bank and for the
Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest and set the public hearing.
Nary: I'll second. I was going to ask, though, does the resolution need a
number? Is it a formal resolution?
Bird: It's a resolution, yes.
Nary: So, it needs a number?
I
1
Meridian City Council Meellllg
July 23, 2002
Page 42 of 51
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council and Councilman Nary. There's
not a resolution on this exchange agreement itself. It's just an action at this
point. If I conclude it's a resolution, there will be a formal resolution. If it's an
ordinance, there will be an ordinance and it will be assigned numbers in due
course.
Nary: Thank you. Second.
Corrie: Okay. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: For the public hearing, it would be very helpful if we had
something that showed where these blocks were in relationship, you know,
some visuals.
Nichols: You mean a presentation?
De Weerd: That would be nice, instead of just lot numbers.
Corrie: Just the pictures of the fire station and the lots over there by the
police station.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I was going to say too, in addition to that, I think aren't these
residences, some of them are currently occupied.
Corrie: Yes.
Nary: So, probably, information about when those leases run out and that
kind of stuff. I think you'd also-Council member De Weerd brought up the
question about the senior vehicle, the senior center's vehicle that they
currently store at the fire station and what's going to happen with that. So, all
of those issues probably need to be out on the table to discuss. Did you get
that? I'm sorry.
Stiles: So, you want some digital photos and maybe the art view information
from the base map?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 43 of 51
Nary: I think just something so the public can see what we're talking about. I
think we want to be able to show the public what we're-what property we're
exchanging for what but I think the other issues that we had previously
discussed, which probably the Bank needs to talk about or someone needs to
talk about, is I think some of those homes are occupied by people. I don't
know how long their leases are. I don't know when they're supposed to be
vacating those properties or even if they're of it. I don't have any idea. We'd
also talked about the senior center vehicle. It's currently housed in the old fire
station and I don't know what particular plan we had in mind as to what to do
with that but I think we at least need to talk about it.
Stiles: Can I get a list of these addresses from Will or the lots and blocks?
Corrie: I think WlIl has them.
Stiles: Do you have them written down? Okay. All right. Thanks. I'll get that
for you.
8. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
Corrie: All right. The next item is water, sewer and trash delinquencies. This
is to inform you in writing if you choose, that you have the right to a pre-
determined hearing at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July the 23rd of 2002 before the
Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to
defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is
delinquent. You may retain counsel and the service will be discontinued on
July 24th of 2002 or July 315t of 2002 unless payment is received in full. Is
there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash
delinquency? Hearing none. I, hereby, inform you that you may appeal or
have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court,
pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be
shut off and the amount of turn-offs is $23,315.96. Council, you've seen the
list of turn-offs. I'll entertain a motion on the action.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the delinquency turn-off list for the water,
sewer, and trash bills and service to be discontinued on July 24th, 2002 or
July 31,2002 for the sum of $23,315.96.
McCandless: Second.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 44 of 51
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further
discussion? Hearing none. All of those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
9. Ordinance No.
Amendments:
02~380
for
Water
and
Sewer
Corrie: Excuse me. Item number nine is a resolution number 02-380 for
water and sewer rate changes. Mr. Clerk, if you will read the Resolution
number 02-380. I guess we don't need to have you read it. There's not that
much there. By title only, I guess. I don't know where it would be a title. I'm
trying to find the first sentence. I'm sorry. I'll let (inaudible) take care of that.
He knows more about it than I do.
Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Resolution 02-380. A
resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian adopting water and sewer
fees.
Corrie: Okay. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to have the
resolution number 02-380 read in it's entirety?
De Weerd: We do.
Bird: We do.
Corrie: I said audience. I didn't say (inaudible)
Bird: It's so small. We can read that one.
Corrie: It does have three, four, five other pages. Mr. Nary.
Nary: Just so I'm clear, the ordinance that's next on the agenda is related to
this resolution. Correct?
Corrie: Yes.
Nary: Okay. Don't we need to pass the ordinance first?
Bird: Yes, we do.
Nary: We can't adopt the resolution of fees until we actually amend the
ordinance that allows us to do it.
Corrie: Okay.
Meridian City Council Meellng
July 23,2002
Page 45 of 51
Nary: I think we have to do it in reverse.
De Weerd: He was jumping up and down but we ignored him.
Corrie: Item number nine is changed to ten and ten to nine and the ordinance
number 02-967 for water and sewer amendments. So, Mr. Clerk if you'll read
the ordinance number 02-967 by title only at this time.
Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Ordinance number
02-967 an ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Meridian City Code by
either adding or deleting language to Section 9-1-7 B application for permits,
fees, 9-1-19 A (1) (2) (4) user charge, B (1) (2) charges for water and
installations, C (1) private fire service, 9-1-21 A termination of service, and B,
right to hearing, 9-4-24 A monthly service charges, 9-4-25 A permit required
fees and B, sewer connection charges providing for conflict, providing for
validity, providing a savings clause and providing an effective date.
Corrie: Okay. On further reading of Ordinance number 02-967. Is there
anyone in the audience that would like it read in its entirety? Hearing none.
I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance number 02-967.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I would move the approval of Ordinance number 02-967 for water and
sewer amendments to the Meridian City Code as prepared and pursuant to
Idaho Code 50-902 to waiver any rules as allowed. The only other thing it
asks is, it appears to be fairly lengthy on whether or not we need a summary
be provided at a Jater time. It's six pages. I just didn't know how much it was
going to cost to print it.
Bird: Second.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I wanted to get the ordinance
to you and I will get the summary. I didn't have sufficient time to prepare it.
Nary: That's great. Just saves us a little bit of money.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any other discussion?
Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 46 of 51
10. Resolution No.
Changes:
02-380
for Water and Sewer Rate
Corrie: Item number ten, now, is resolution number 02-380 for water and
sewer rate changes. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to have it
read in it's entirety. Okay. I'll entertain a motion on Resolution number 02-
380.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I'd move the approval of Resolution 02-380 for water and sewer rate
changes as prepared for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded. Any further discussion? Roll
call vote, Mr. Berg. AI] ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
10-B. ACHD - Dissolve? Create Letter
Corrie: The next item is an added one, the discussion on ACHD, a letter or
message to Ada County Commissioners on the question of dissolution of
ACHD. We did get an ACHD reason for being tonight and we thank them for
that. I guess the question is, do we want to send a letter to the ACC people
saying that we don't necessarily want a dissolution of the ACHD but we
should look at other means to work out some difficulties that might be there,
whether to do a letter, to do it by phone, or do both because it's coming up I
imagine rather quickly that they're going to have a hearing. Commissioner
Kingsford is going to ask for it anyway.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: The date has been set for August 28th. I think over the last
couple of years that Shari and J have served, our communication with ACHD
has gotten much improved and I just can't see-l agree with Commissioner
Simmons that unless there's a proposal that comes forward that suggests
something that would work, you know, I don't see, in my personal opinion,
that there's a big issue. Certainly, if the cities were to inherit it or their own
Meridian City Council Meetlllg
July 23,2002
Page 47 of 51
roads, it's such a duplication of personnel and administration and there would
be no equipment transfer. We'd be starving from ground zero. I don't know-
*** End of Side Three ***
De Weerd: --I think that if there are things that we have concerns about in
dealing with ACHD, now is the time to pull that information together and ask
them to work on it, come to the table, and try-if people think it's broken, let's
try and fix it before we throw it out. That's my two cents.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I'll put in my penny's worth. I have a lot of disagreements with ACHD
but I'm sure they have a lot of disagreements with the City of Meridian and
some of the things we do. I think that when they were originally set up, they
were set up as kind of an overseer of the deals and when the first bunch of
Commissioners in there, basically, most of the work was done through private
industry contracts. Now, they have built themselves into a humongous
construction company and staff, which is neither here nor there. Meridian,
Idaho, the City of Meridian, could not, for 7% that our taxes pay, could not do
the infrastructure. Absolutely could not and with our impact fees. I'm like
Tammy, I think that we need to work with them. I think our working
relationship has definitely improved since they've come to a five-person
commission. I think they try to listen. I'm sure they've got some complaints
against us. I think that we need to write a letter as public officials. I would
hope that all five of us would agree with supporting them, not supporting the
whole program but I think it can be worked out to the betterment and I think
it's the only way that we're going to have any infrastructure in Ada County. If
you split it up, it's just duplication.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess if Council member De Weerd put in her two cents and Mr. Bird
put in one, I guess it's a farthing that I have. You know, I guess my only
thought is, I would agree with what's been said. I think the relationship with
the City of Meridian and the Ada County Highway District has been very
positive. I have heard almost every day from somebody that they don't like
that bridge getting resurfaced or something happening in town and it's
something we need to fix and, you know, I feel sorry for the Highway District.
You can't do this in one day. You can't do it overnight. There are a lot of
things that people get very frustrated by. They like the results but they don't
Meridian City Council Meetlllg
July 23, 2002
Page 48 of 51
like the road to get there. I think there are some real positive-but on the
other side, I don't necessarily think it's as horrific or scary either to
contemplate the dissolution of ACHD because it may not necessarily be the
cities doing it themselves. The Highway District, by statute, would have to
continue operating until a plan was in place. The County would probably
have to run the program and that actually gives me more pause than the
Highway District, in doing it You know, I guess I'm torn only in the fact that I
don't necessarily think it's the worst thing that could ever happen in this
community, was to not have another layer of government to have to work
through to get anything accomplished. I think that's the frustration that our
citizens and we've felt. It's just another governmental layer. They serve a
great purpose. There's a good reason it was instituted. There's a good
reason it should continue. I don't know that all the alternatives are
necessarily better. I think they're just different You know, if we want to do a
letter, that's fine. I think our presence would probably be better than a letter.
I think our presence would probably be a good idea to participate in that
because I think the Highway District and what the paper carries and the news
sees a lot, is the entities that don't get along with the Highway District and are
always adverse to each other and we generally are. I think, at least, the
County Commissioners need to hear that not all entities have the same
issues with the Highway District and not all entities have as much problem
with the Highway District. So, yes, I don't have a problem with doing a letter.
I think our presence would probably be better and at least, you know, if it
ends up in our lap, at least we're going to end up going in with eyes wide
open. I think we should at least be there to say what our experience has
been.
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless, anything?
McCandless: Well, I certainly agree with what Bill said. I can't see acting on
the dissolution because I agree with Tammy. We'd be in a real mess. We
have to have something in place in order to do that. I have my disagreements
with them but they're what we have and I think the more we support them,
perhaps we'll get even better service. I would go along with that and I agree
that we should be there.
Corrie: Okay. Do you want me to get a letter up and make sure that each of
you get a slot and place to sign and then look at it and have it ready for you-
what is tomorrow, Wednesday? I've got a deposition and litigation for all day
tomorrow on a case we've had pending, mediation is what it is.
Nary: If it's August 28th as a public hearing, we could have it at our next
meeting on the 6th.
De Weerd: Yes.
i
Meridian City Council Meell'()
July 23, 2002
Page 49 of 51
Corrie: All right. Well, okay. I can get it to you by Monday.
De Weerd: If you can e-mail it to us, we'd have a chance to look at it and give
comments.
Corrie: Yes. Then, you can look at and see what it looks like.
Nary: And make suggestions if we want to. As long as we maybe at least
take some action by the 6th, that's plenty of time.
De Weerd: We can sign it on the 6th.
Corrie: Okay. Do you want me to call Grant Kingsford and tell him that we
are having a letter coming and we want to be at the meeting on the 28th, to be
there to give Meridian support of our thoughts and that?
Nary: What time on the 28th?
Corrie: What time is that, Tammy? Do you know what the time it is on the
28th?
(inaud ible)
De Weerd: 7:00 in the evening?
(inaudible)
Corrie: Okay. So, that would be on Wednesday? Okay. I'll call Grant
tomorrow and get the particulars on that and tell him our face is here and I'll
get the letter worked up and send an e-mail. Keith, I'll need your e-mail
address.
Bird: Yes. You've got it. I think it's just changed, though.
Corrie: You're the only one that it kicked it back to me. J will also call David
Wyncoop and Jay Sweitzer just to let them know too. Do you have anything
that you need to talk to Council about? Okay. All right. I know J've got
something else here. What did I do with that? Here it is. The next is the
Executive Session. I need some advice on some, attorney advice. One thing
before we do go into that, Debbie Salone said that there out at the Meridian
Greens is going to have a night out, a group of ten, on August 6th from 7:00 to
10:00. The regular night out for Meridian was cancelled. But, they're going to
have it so if everybody wants to go out there-well, we have our meeting.
Meridian City Council MeeIH'!d
July 23, 2002
Page 50 of 51
De Weerd: We'll miss our meeting.
Corrie: We'd miss our meeting. Okay.
Nary: We've got the Bear Creek opening tomorrow.
Corrie: Bear Creek opening tomorrow at 6:00.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
11. Executive Session per Idaho Code 967-2345 (1 )(b) and (1 )(f): No
Decision
Nary: I move we go into Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (b)
and (1) (f).
Corrie: The motion has been made. Is there a second?
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Nary: I move we come out of Executive Session.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and second. All those in favor say aye. Let
the record show that no decisions were made at the Executive Session. I'll
entertain a motion to close the meeting.
De Weerd: I move we adjourn.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. 10:20
P.M.
MOTION CARRIED
I
Meridian City Council Meelll.\..I
July 23, 2002
Page 51 of 51
i
\
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:20 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
~~
)/().~
R T D. CORRIE, MAYOR
8 /;20/02-
DATE
ATTESTED:
'V li CLZ)~ ? oS t j;( 11 (,C~ ~ G 1'Lo h ee;- -rhC!u1'l1LS !
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCII.2 REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
B. Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives:
C. Change Order NO.1 for Chateau Park:
D. Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park:
E. Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park:
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position:
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report:
2. Grant Research Results:
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page I of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian,
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
C. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out Pre-
design, Agreement for Professional SelVices:
2. Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees:
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget:
7. Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus ProperW -~ Former Fire
Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash:
8. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
9. Executive Session per Idaho Code fi67-2345 (1)(b) and (1)(f):
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
** TX CONFIRMRTION REPORT **
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DRTE TIME TO/FROM
07/19 13:15 3810160
07/19 13:17 PUBLIC WORKS
07/19 13:17 2088881193
07/19 13:18 8841159
07/19 13:20 2088840744
07/19 13:20 2088845077
07/19 13:21 208 898 5501
07/19 13:22 LIBRRRY
07/19 13:23 92083776449
07/19 13:24 208 388 6924
07/19 13:25 888 6854
07/19 13:27 2083757154
07/19 13:27 8950390
07/19 13:29 Laurel
07/19 13:30 208 387 6393
07/19 13:31 ADR CTY DEUELMT
07/19 13:32 CHERIE MCCRNDLES
07/19 13:33 CHERRY LANE
07/19 13:35 POST OFFICE
07/19 13:36 208 888 1983
07/19 13:37 Walter R Johnson
07/19 13:38 208 467 9562
07/19 13:39 208 888 6700
RS OF JUL 19 '02 13:40 PAGE. 01
MODE
EC--S
UF--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
G3--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
G3--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
CITY OF MERIDIRN
MIN/SEC PGS
00'46" 002
00' 19" 002
00'29" 002
00'30" 002
00' 29" 002
00'31" 002
00'29" 002
00'34" 002
00' 29" 002
00' 35" 002
00'30" 002
00'29" 002
00'29" 002
00'31" 002
00'29" 002
01'07" 002
00'38" 002
00' 35" 002
00'46" 002
00'46" 002
00'32" 002
00'34" 002
00' 31" 002
CMDl:I
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
090
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ 19.1z'6e- ? oSt -ft>r ?uJ0-k<=-. 1Lo~Q;- -rhour1lLS !
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGUL.AR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23. 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI.call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
SUI Nary
Keith Bird
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
July 19, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT MUBS ITEM NO. 3..B
REQUEST Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing Directives:
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK;
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER: See Attached Sample Notice and Billing Directives
Contacted: Date: Phone:
vJ--'
~
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the CIfy of Meridian.
;
.!
City of Meridian
33 E Idaho Ave
Meridian, Id 83642
(208) 888-4439
Mail to:
Leslie Howard
1206 Fairwood Ave
Nampa,Id 8365]
Amount Enclosed
Service Address
I Account Nnmbc(
I Past Duo AllIllllw
Firwl111l1P Dillie
Dear Customer,
We're concerned. According to our records, we have not yet received payment for your water sewer and trash
bill which was due -1-1_. Under our rules and regulations, as approved by the Meridian City Council, wa-
ter bills shall be considered late ten days after the bill date.
Have you already sent us your payment? If so, please accept our thanks and disregard this reminder. If you
have not yet sent in your payment, please do sO by return mail , pay in person at City Hall located at 33 E Idaho
Ave., Meridian, or place your payment in our night deposit box located by the front doors of City Hall. Pay-
ment mUst be received prior to the close of business on the final due date printed at the top of this notice.
We will make every effort to work with you to set up payment arrangements if you aloe unable to pay the
full amount owed. However, if you have not made payment arrangements or paid your bill by the final date
printed at the top of this notice, your water service will be disconnected for non-payment. If your water service
is terminated, an additional $30.00 reconnection fee will be required to restore service.
If disconnecting your water service would adversely affect a serious illness or create a medical emergency for
someone in your home, you may give us a statement from your doctor confirming this and we will postpone
shutting off your water service for 30 days.
If you dispute the bil~ or the termination of water service, you may argue on your behalf at a pretermination
hearing before the Mayor and City Council on the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 6:30pm. You are hereby in-
formed that you may appeal this notice with the Fourth Judicial Court, Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-5201. Your
water service will not be reinstated by the appeal process alone.
We would be happy to disCUSS your account with you. Please feel free to contact us.
Customer Service: (208) 888-4439
Hours: Monday-Friday
8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
The tear-off portion of this reminder should be included with your payment in the envelope provided.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this past due water bill.
I SetYioo AtJ<lJ:o., I Notice Dall: 11\"01101 Num"'" I
Past Due Amonnt
I Fiu,1 Due lEt<
Current
Billing Directive Procedures
A. When a renter moves in, the homeowner authorizing the MUBS department to
send the bill directly to their tenant must fill out a billing directive.
B. When the tenant moves, the MUBS department is notified either by the tenant
or the homeowner. At that time a termination read is requested so that a final
bill can be processed.
C. After the meter is read, the account is terminated and a final bill is sent to the
tenant.
D. lfthe tenant does not pay after one month, another bill is sent to the tenant as
well as the homeowner.
E. lfthe bill is not paid after the second attempt, a bill is sent to the homeowner
with a letter stating that we have been unable to collect from the renter and
that if not paid the account balance will be transferred to the active account.
F. Ifbill is not paid after the third attempt we send the homeowner a letter stating
that the bill has not been paid and we are transferring the unpaid balance to
the new tenants account and if not paid the water to the home will be turned of
for non payment on the next turn off day.
Proposed
Residential Billing Procedure
for account termination and reactivation
A At the time of the termination read the Water Department employee will
terminate service and lock the meter off, unless a special request is made to leave
the water on for not more than five business days to allow the new owners to
establish the account in their name. The meter will be locked off after five
business days if the new owner has not contacted MUBS to transfer the account
into their name( s).
B. The water service to the home will not be reinstated until the homeowner contacts
the MUBS Department to transfer account into their name.
C Turn-on fee will be charged in accordance with the current City ordinance for all
turn-ons.
D. Turn on fee will be charged in accordance with the current City ordinance for all
seasonal terminates.
RECEIVED
JUL 1 72002
City of Meri4i~n
City Clerk OxflCG
Me
To: Mayor & Council Members
From:Gary D. Smith, PE
CC: file, Rick Clinton, Brad Watson
Date: May 13,2002
Re: Water Account Management
(ovv~rtv
v frr' 1--J/o'1;
'0 1/
c(
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached for your review and comments is a copy of documents being proposed to assist
your Water and MUSS departments in better management of our water users accounts:
1. Proposed Delinquency Notice for water, sewer, trash accounts that are not paid and
subject to tum-off. (Reviewed by City Attorney, City Engineer, MUSS staff.) These
notices will be mailed in-house. We are optimistic that this notice will reduce the
number of account turn-offs.
2. Current Billing Directive for residential rental property.
3. Proposed Billing Directive for residential rental property. (Previously presented at
City Council workshop on April 9, 2002).
4. Proposed Residential Account Termination and Reactivation. (Prepared following
From the~of...
Gary D. Smith, PE
Public Works Director
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax; (208) 887-1297
meeting with Mayor Corrie, Gary Smith and Rick Clinton. Reviewed by MUSS and
Water Department staff.)
We presently have a Renter's Agreement in place that allows the water, sewer & trash bill to
be sent directly to the renter to reportedly facilitate payment of the bill. Because of some
problems in collecting from renters, we are proposing to eliminate this policy. We feel the
proposed billing directive will accommodate the landlords by providing a meter reading each
time a tenant moves out; locking off the meter until the delinquencies are paid in full and
then reactivating the service when the rental is reoccupied. Bill Nichols has recommended
that we leave the existing renter agreements in place because of the possibility that some
existing lease agreements may require the tenant to be responsible for payment of the
water, sewer and trash bill. Bill Nichols and Councilman Nary have recommended that we
hold a public hearing before discontinuing this policy to make sure there are no other
concerns from the landlord community in abandoning this policy.
We welcome your comments on these proposed items. We desire to bring a final document
for each of the proposed items back to a regular City Council meeting as soon in the near
future as possible. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me
know.
Regards,
Ga~
. Page 2
lQ)fR1~~r
oe-\~Y\ 1,^~1
1\ ()~
City of Meridian
33 E Idaho Ave
Meridian. Id 83642
(208) 888-4439
Mail to:
Leslie Howard
1206 Fairwood Ave
Nampa, ld 8365 [
Amount Enclosed
Service Address
I A=nn' Nnmbcr
Past One Amount
Final Dlle Date
Dear Customer,
We're concerned. According to our records, we have not yet received payment for your water sewer and trash
bill which was due ~ ~ _' Under our rules and regulations, as approved by the Meridian City Council, wa-
ter bills shall be considered late ten days after the bill date,
Have you already sent us your payment? If so, please accept our thanks and disregard this reminder. If you
have not yet sent in your payment, please do so by return mail , pay in person at City Hall located at 33 E Idaho
Ave., Meridian, or place your payment in our night deposit box located by the front doors of City Hall. Pay-
ment must be received prior to the close of business on the final due date printed at the top of this notice.
We wiU make every effort to work witb you to set up payment arrangements if you are unable to pay tbe
full amount owed. However, if you have not made payment arrangements or paid your bill by the fmal date
printed at the top of this notice, your water service will be disconnected for non-payment. If your water service
is tenninated, an additional $10.00 reconnection fee will be required to restore service.
If disconnecting your water service would adversely affect a serious illness or create a medical emergency for
someone in your home, you may give us a statement from your doctor confinning this and we will postpone
shutting off your water service for 30 days,
If you dispute the bill, or the termination of water service, you may argue on your behalf at a pretennination
hearing before thdvfayor and City Council on the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 6:30pm, You are hereby in-
formed that you may appeal this notice with the Fourth Judicial Court, Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-520 1. Your
water service will not be reinstated by the appeal process alone.
We would be happy to discuss your account with you. Please feel free to contact us.
Customer Service: (208) 888-4439
Hours: Monday-Friday
8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
TIle tear-off portion of this reminder should be included with your payment in the envelope provided.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this past due water bill.
I Not;"" Date I Ace",,,' Num!ll:[
I Seovice Add",<<
Pilst Due Amounl
I F;n,1 D,,, D,,,< I
Proposed
Residential Rental Billing Directive Procedure
for account termination and reactivation
A. When a renter moves in, the homeowner must authorize the rvfUBS
department to send the bill directly to their tenant by signing a billing
directive.
B. When the tenant moves out, the MUBS department may be notified either by
the tenant or the homeowner. On the specified move out date a termination
read will be requested. At the time of the termination read the Water
Department employee will terminate service and lock the meter off. ff
notification does not occur from either the owner or the tenant, then the
account will be terminated as a result of either (I) an investigation into zero
consumption resulting in discovery that the rental is vacant or (2) when the
account is tenninated for delinquency,
C. The water service to the home will not be reinstated until the bill is paid in full
by either the tenant or the homeowner. If the homeowner fails to notify the
MUBS department of a new tenant, the homeowner will be responsible for the
total amount of the bill up to the date that we are notified. A new billing
directive shall not be executed until the account is paid current. A new
account generation will be started only after the account is paid current and
the homeowner executes a new billing directive for the new tenant. If a
portion of the bill belongs to the new tenant, it will be the homeowner's
responsibility to collect that from the new tenant.
D. As per Gary Smith and Mayor Corrie, the tenant or the homeowner cannot
make arrangements on the account once a tenant has vacated the home. The
account balance must be paid current before the meter will be reactivated,
E. Turn-on and turn-off fees will be charged in accordance with the current City
ordinance,
rage 1 OI 1
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith [smiths@cLmeridian.id.us] on behalf of Sharon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 20024:40 PM
To: Gary Smith (E-mail); Rick Clinton (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail)
Cc: Will Berg
Subject: Water Account Management I Billing Directives & Delinqu. Notice
The Mayor has instructed this office to put these items on consent agenda for July 23rd for
approval.
Do you want me to include the draft delinqu. notice that shows a $30.00 turn on fee rather
than the $1 O.OO? If so, can you send me a clean version noting the $30.00 fee? That would be
great.
On the billing directives, shall I include the proposed residential billing procedure and
residential rental billing directive which were submitted at workshops in May and June? Were
there more current! final versions?
Please let me know. Thank you!
Shav011l
7/17/02
RECEIVED
JUL 1 7 2002
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
M
)J~-
W{V
(; '7 /i)V
1/ ~
To: Mayor & Council
From: Gary D. Smith, PE
CC: file ~k c.~
Date: June 11, 2002
Re: Water Meter Shut-off Policy and Delinquency Notice
Mayor & Council: At a recent workshop, we discussed a policy we presently have in place
known as a "renters policy" which permits a renter, with written permission of the property
owner, to receive the billing and pay directly for water, sewer and trash service. As related
to you by our Water Superintendent and Billing Supervisor, this policy is wrought with
problems, especially when a renter moves out leaving an unpaid water, sewer and trash bill.
After much discussion, Gauna/man Nary suggested the Gity discontinue this policy and your
staff concurs with and supports his suggestion. Discontinuance of this policy will place us in
line with what our present Sewer and Water Use Ordinance requires in making the property
owner responsible for payment of this utility bill. City Attorney Nichols suggested that a
public hearing be held so that landlords who have subscribed to this "renters policy" can
make any adjustments necessary to lease agreements they presently have in force. Staff
requests that a public hearing be set for this matter.
In an associated matter, a copy of a Proposed uResidential
Billing Procedure for Account Tennination and
From the cksk of...
Gary D. Smith,. PE
Public Works Director
Meridian Public Works Depar1menl
660 E. Walertower Lane,Suile 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-55CO
Fax: (208) 887-1297
Reactivation" is attached for your review, This proposal clearly outlines this procedure for
all involved. Staff asks if any action is needed from Council to set this procedure in
place?
Also, attached for your review and approval, as a measure to reduce the number of
accounts on the Ittum-off' list for non-payment of water, sewer and trash bills, is a proposed
"Delinquency Notice" to be mailed by in-house staff to those accounts that are delinquent,
prior to the Water-Sewer~Trash Delinquency Tum-off hearing. This proposed notice has
been reviewed by staff and City Attorney Nichols and contains comments from those
reviewers. Staff requests your endorsement of this proposed measure to help reduce
water meter tum-offs for account delinquency.
Additionally, staff has met to review the contents of the present water-sewer-trash bill in an
effort to clarify past due amounts and payment due dates, Some clarifications, in staff's
opinion, have been made and the next printing of the bills will have a slightly different fannat
to that end.
Regards, ~
Gary Smit';(J--
. Page 2
Proposed
Residential Billing Procedure
for account termination and reactivation
A. At the time of the termination read the Water Department employee will
terminate service and lock the meter off, unless a special request is made to leave
the water on for not more than five business days to allow the new owners to
establish the account in their name. The meter will be locked off after five
business days if the new owner has not contacted MUBS to transfer the account
into their name(s).
B. The water service to the home will not be reinstated until the homeowner contacts
the MUBS Department to transfer account into their name.
C. Turn-on fee will be charged in accordance with the current City ordinance for all
turn-ons.
D. Tum on fee will be charged in accordance with the current City ordinance for all
seasonal terminates.
. ------
,I
City of Meridian
33 E Idaho Ave
Meridian, Td 83642
(208) 888-4439
"D IIj.\ f)
Mail to:
Leslie Howard
1206 Fairwood Ave
Nampa,Id 83651
I A",oun. Number
Amount Enclosed
ServiOC Add"".
Dear Customer,
Past Due Amount
Final Due Date
We're concerned. According to our records, we have not yet received payment for your water bill which was
due _1_1_, Under our rules and regulations, as approved by the Meridian City Council, water bills may be
considered tate ten days after the bill date.
Have you already sent us your payment? If so, please accept our thanks and disregard this reminder. If you
have not yet sent in your payment, please do so by return mail before the final due date printed at the top of
this notice. You aJso are welcome to pay in person at City HaJllocated at 33 E Idaho Ave in Meridian or you
may place your payment in our night deposit box, which is located by the front doors of City Hall.
We will make every effort to work with you to set up payment arrangements if you are unable to pay the
full amount owed. However, if you have not made payment arrangements or paid your water bill by the final
date printed at the top ofWs notice, your water service will be disconnected for non-payment. If your water
service is terminated before the bill is paid, an additional $W:'OO reconnection fee will be required to restore
servi ceo '3()1ft>
If disconnecting your water service would adversely affect a serious illness or create a medical emergency for
someone in your home, you may give us a statement from your doctor confmning this and we 'Will postpone
shutting off your water service for 30 days.
You may argue on your behalf at a predetennination hearing before the Mayor and City Council the 3rd Tues-
day of the month at 7:30 pm You are hereby informed that you may appeal this notice with the Fourth Judicial
Court, Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-520 1. Your water service 'Win not be reinstated by the appeal process alone.
We would be happy to discuss your account with you. Please feel free to contact us.
Customer Service: (208) 888-4439
Hours: Monday-Friday
8:00 a.rn.-4:30 p.rn.
The tear-<>ffportion of this reminder should be included with your payment in the envelope provided.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this past due water bill.
Service address
I No.ico daIC I Aceo"nt llJ,mber I P3:il lll,e Am",m'
I Eirol Du, \11''' I
July 19, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Parks Department
REQUEST Change Order No. 1 for Chateau Park
ITEM NO.
3-C
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLlCE DEPT:
CITY FI RE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER: See Attached Memo from Tom Kuntz with Change Order(s)
Contacted: Date: Phone:
~~
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
~ ~ ".""? .
Meridian Parks & Recreation ~" . ~ . "
. ,
~ . .
~ ~'>
./ .? / /~?,"~ ~ / ~ ~ : f '<< ? ,. ~~ ?? /"~~''''''.I:
Memo
RECEIVED
JUL '1 9 2002
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Mayor Corrie I City Council
Tom Kuntz "flL
July 19, 2002
Consent Agenda Items for July 23, 2002 Meeting
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFfC":F
The Parks Staff is requesting three change orders for your approval under the
consent agenda for your July 23, 2002 meeting,
~t- 1. Chateau Park Change Order #1 w $7226.89
The original plans from our architects called for a water tap near the fire
hydrant in Chateau Park. After final review the fire department inform us that
the tap would not be pennitted, Item 1A on the attached change order covers
the addition of 460 Lf of 4" water pipe and a deduction of 140 Lf of 2" water
line for a net increase of $5290,00, Item 1B reflects a decrease for the
concrete curbing around the playground area and an increase in the concrete
curb, gutter, and flat work for a net increase of $1936.89. This will be the only
change order since the park is complete,
2. Settler's Park Change Order #4 ~ $5802.00
When the water line was being installed in Meridian Road, ACHD inspectors
found the native soils in the water line trench to be unsuitable for replacement.
The change order covers the cost of replacing the solfs with pit run. We plan
on recouping one half of the total cost through the latecomer's agreement with
Sundance Subdivision since this water line benefits their development.
3. Settler's Park Change Order #5. $168,059.00
This change order covers the cost of building the second portion of the
parking lot along Meridian Road, The original estimate of $125,000.00 was
provided prior to design specifications. David Mae of the CM Company and
Keith Bird our Council Liaison have reviewed the cost difference between the
Page 1
. Page 2
original estimate and the new proposal and found the costs to be fair and
acceptable. The largest increase is the result of additional pit run material
necessary to be imported for the parking lot base, To date this change order
brings the total construction of Settler's Park to $1,097,996.00. The architect's
estimate for phase 1 was $1,300,000,00 and our total budgeted amount for
the project was $1,500,000.00. With the attached change orders we are still
under budget.
.kj
.K:} Corporation, Inc.
23l6N. Cole Rd" Suite D
Boise, ldaho 83704
Ph, (208)378-8713
Fix (20il) :t78-936i
Meridian Parks and Recreation
11 BowerSt:r:eet
Mendian, ID 83642 .
, July' 1.8, 2002
SUBJECT: Chateau Park Deve'~opment
Change Order #1
A Till: Tom KUntz
Dear Tom, " .
:. ". .The following'is K-J Corporation's request'for Change Order #L
. , I ' _.;", . c .
Change Qrder Ite~ # iA:: Water lirte .'cluingesas illustrated Q~' CT A) :drawing
. C201, revision #3 ; .' .: . . , . .'" . '.'
. '.' > AmoUnt:: ',' '$S,290:bO
, . .(K~i Corp~ratio~ ha~ not 'app~~~~ ai:1Y~arkupto this dkect'co~t.) .
C~ange Order Item '#1 B::.,nrffering a~tual quantities y~rs~s' .bid' quantities, bid' . .
.items'9, 10 and 1.1 '. . . ..
. , ., Amoupt. $1,936~89'.' .
, . .'., . .
. . Total Chartge Order #1 ie:quest: . $7,226> ,Sq.
. . Please see.following:doc.umeritRtion f~{batk.up. ...... .'
. . . ,', < ,
If you Mv~' any 'qU~$tio~s please' ~~n".t:h~sitate to ~?n..
- ..'
,5 incerely,
e&~~. . ...
,Enclosures: 0 C~ange' Ord~r'l:A and lB..d:~cumehtati?n
, ..,
<- ," ':
D~C-19-20Gl B2:Se PM
ROCKY MOU~TAIN PAvXN~ IA
:<:ee, - -3 9913
""-.0 ~u <,. I'" ,_ ....
p.e1
" R' :~~~ ~U~,' .' ';'. I"N' " ". ~/;":~J~;:~.:,~-\:;:" ;~. ,~.. .
:W~Ql' "mil . p \ill. ", ," ., ":"
",'" '. . . '.:.'., "::/i... ~ :'~~IF.?.r'~'^~?'~'~"'/~..i:;;: ....~.. '; <;':'. .. ,", ~,., '0">': '~.
. ". '. . 'P'~.~'Jlil,0~'.J'~",.i1,g. :"'~.;: ... "'._.,'. "..". ;..~. ',,'. ; ."::: _
. . .,'. ,.... :... 'SOjs.'~II;f~Hldl :7..' '. "'~: ~~'l';'; ::';:. ':;,:: ': ~I~~' .: . ..~;.:.: .~
2D8j~h '" ..... ,~.'d~~;t;i~~~:t{;;';ti!~";'f;::'i~i',,;..:,..,'L~;~;~!",;L:, .. .
1<' - J G:m.p
C J.:)9
Request For Change Order
'or:
v' ~ ctu. cf
At>t)
~#~~ ~
Of I I - {\ f~G)c:. r ~ Lf ~ H ~ (;.,1- (_, 5 \l 0.'" )
If Iq 0 L. F' 1./" r ' ~ ~ , ') ft..fO, L F
;Z... I" ~kJJLu... '-\ 1I"rIFt I t'Y/fM ~ ~ke..ib
M~\-\$.6.) I J" ~ os "'-r S I J.e; / 5'-0 CI"'''".e.......
a - ~ II "!>AJJ G.v eo.,.;", 411 ~ J ;.." ~ 'S ~f" , J. if
'Tn/ P X 'j> P J' ~AJ e..,\4r ,.., J... (I!) ,100 _,!' ~
5180-
,
I.~_.'"
t./' A- 't) 'D
,.'11)
'!O(,) ~
A-t1t)
000
Lfoo -
A- 't>b
I - A" ",..\loA l. "'- 4', ~ J1,.. tv....~ I'y.. !.
~.. ~ J~('lo"O-
Total CheRIe Onje,r .
J/ I. ~-oee..
$ .5 r2. 'TO 09-
-=:t_ ,!=----===
DA 1E ACCEPTIio
. ,,--,,'
REPRBS!NTATIVE
4/.>
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PAVING. INC.
~";'t't.t
l-"';I
. .'............ _J
." ~,
"
, ,
I .' ~
, Est. ,
Unit Total Bid
Ilem Description Quantity Unit Price Price 'l
AI/labor and materials
associated with installatjon ~
6 of sanitary sewer system lS 1,D8q -soRCI
within the park site per I ,
plans and specifications. '-
Unit Price: k 'l1c
... Dollars and Cents ~
All labor and materials
associated with installation
~ of potable water fine, lS 'f3Jb 1 :
, f3'3~ . .
;
within the park site per I ! tt'
plans and specifications,
\
Unit Price: 'SQ,.J1 l::11~(\ -r Dollars and Cenls. ~
"
All labor and materia Is ~
associated with installation !
8 1 LS 3l..~ JZ~ ~
of telephone service within
I
the parI< site,
,. Unit Price: nDj)~ Dollars and
All Jabor and materials
9 associated with new LF /1Cj9
concr~te- curb around
playground area.
Unit Price: l,,",aA. Oollars and qD Cents
All labor and materials -:;.. 58S ;
associated with concrete "
10 curb and gutter and vaney ~ LF jbCf] ~: , ;
gutter relative \0 new 441 1
,
1 parking area, I
Unit Price: S. ..1\ Dollars and ~1 Cents
L-
All labor and materials /2 llc$
associated with concrete 2~
f I
i 1 sidewalks and flatworkj' ~ SF ,
exclusive of basketball i
4~ t
courts, I t
Unit Price: WO Dollars and \
.. NJ- ~D^"Tb > iJ~ II
,
f
10 {
r
j
July 19,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Parks Department
REQUEST Change Order NO.4 for Meridian Settler's Park
ITEM NO.
3-D
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER: See Attached Memo from Tom Kuntz with Change Order(s)
Contacted: Date: Phone:
~~
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
:;;:<~,;:~~~'S ",,; <"'Yl <<~/fl". . ~ <::r ~ f/.:r ;~';,r4~,,~1:f~~tft.~~y,:~'t<,"~~'0";~;:;~,",k.:~~~~:~<~:-,.~::~
" Merittian Parks & Recreation, .., _' ,':-, " - ',-,'e,,; :,--- _":.'1
t~~,!~;~~;;:~.;~> -':,: -:~! - '_:' ::.! ;"y:< _" ),;~:~~;:j~;-'i;~~-Jd:~~~~:i~~-~_~iL;;~;~l
Memo
RECEIVED
;' j a ";'L"~
... .... - -j i..,'_ .".:,.
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Mayor Corrie I City Council
T om Kuntz 1-= lL
July 19, 2002
Consent Agenda Items for July 23} 2002 Meeting
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFlrf=
The Parks Staff is requesting three change orders for your approval under the
consent agenda for your July 23, 2002 meeting.
1. Chateau Park Change Order #1- $7226.89
The original plans from our architects called for a water tap near the fire
hydrant in Chateau Park. After final review the fire department inform us that
the tap would not be pelTTlitted. Item 1A on the attached change order covers
the addition of 460 Lf of 4" water pipe and a deduction of 140 Lf of 2" water
line for a net increase of $5290.00. Item 1 B reflects a decrease for the
concrete curbing around the playground area and an increase in the concrete
curb, gutter, and flat work for a net increase of $1936.89. This wHl be the only
change order since the park is complete.
~ 2. Settler's Park Change Order #4 - $5802.00
When the water line was being installed in Meridian Road, ACHD inspectors
found the native soils in the water line trench to be unsuitable for replacement.
The change order covers the cost of replacing the soils with pit run, We plan
on recouping one half of the total cost through the latecomer's agreement with
Sundance Subdivision since this water line benefits their development.
3, Settler's Park Change Order #5 - $168,059.00
This change order covers the cost of building the second portion of the
parking lot along Meridian Road. The original estimate of $125,000,00 was
provided prior to design specifications. David Mae of the CM Company and
Keith Bird our Council Liaison have reviewed the cost difference between the
Page 1
(
original estimate and the new proposal and found the costs to be fair and
acceptable. The largest increase is the result of additional pit run material
necessary to be imported for the parking Jot base. To date this change order
brings the total construction of Settler's Park to $1,097,996.00. The architect's
estimate for phase 1 was $1,300,000.00 and our total budgeted amount for
the project was $1,500,000.00. With the attached change orders we are stfll
under budget.
. Page 2
2000 Edition ~ Electronic Format
AlA Document G701- 2000
Change Order
PROJECT:
(Hame and address)Meridian 58 Acre Park
Phase One
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:04
DATE: June 19, 2002
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 01028
CONTRACT DATE: March 28,2002
CONTRACT FOR: Site Development &
Landscape
TO CONTRACTOR:
(Name and address)American Paving PO Box
395 Meridian, Idaho 83680
THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOLLOWS:
(Ine/ude, where applicable, an)' undisputed am 0 u11l attributable to previously executed ConstrucUOJl Change Directives.)
Additional cost due to removal and replacement of unsuitable soils in water line trench on
Meridian Rd.. as required by ACHD See attached invoice from Cascade Pipe Corp and
American Paving.
The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) was $ 833, 165. 00
The net change by previously authorized Change Orders $90.970.00
The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) prior to this Change Order was $924.135.00
The (Contract Sum) (Cuaranteed Maximum-Pfl€e.twill be (increased) (decrcased) (unchanged) by
this Change Order in the amount of $5,802.00
The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum ~ including this Change Order will be
$929,937.00
The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by (Q) days.
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 10/14/02
NOTE: This Change Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or
Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive for
which the cost or lime are in dispute as described in Subparagraph 7.3.8 of AIA Document A2.Ol.
Not valid until signed bv the Architect, Contractor and Owner.
The Land Group, Inc.
American Paving Co.
City of Meridian
N E R (Typed name)
(Signature)
(Signature)
-re((~L{
BY
BY
tifttJ to fZe .
BY n1i. ~ 4/2lr1-t?
~ /11 /6;?-
DATi
tP - jc/ -/)z..,-
DATE
DATE
@ 2000 The Amencan Institute ot Architects. Reproduction ot the material herein or substantial quotation
of its provisions without written permission of the AlA violates the copyright laws of the United States and
will subject the violator to legal prosecution. WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright
laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution. This document was electronically produced with
permission of the AlA and can be reproduced in accordance with your license without violation until the
date of expiration as noted below. User Document: changeorder3.aia -- 6119/2002. AlA License Number
1116865, which expires on 5/31/2003.
OWNER 0
ARCHITECT 0
CONTRACTOR 0
FIELD 0
OTHER D
AUTHENnCAnON OF TH~
ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTED AlA
DOCUMENT MAYBE MADE BY USING
AlA DOCUMENT D401.
~
@ 2000 AIA@
AlA DOCUMENT G701-2000
CHANGE ORDER
ihe American Institute of
Architects
1735 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006-5292
',",' . ."" . . ..'". . .". . h " -" .... '."'~' .. *' _ _'. * . , "
-, " ", Am~l~can:.P~vlng,Co." .. '.
Telephone: 888-7988
Fax: 888-5020
P.O. Box 395, Meridian, Idaho 83680
Idaho P.w. #12145-AAA-2-4(43)
Oregon CCB # 137240
June 7, 2002
The Land Group
Attn: Dave Koga
128 SEagle Rd
Eagle, Idaho 83616
Re: Meridian 58-Acre Park Phase I
American Paving Co. Job# 1248
The following is request for change order as per our letter dated May 23, 2002, concerning removal
and replacement of unsuitable soils in water line trench. as required by ACHD. The agreed upon
unit price was $10.90 per cy, actual quantity required to be removed and replaced was 532.33 cy for
a total of $5,802.00. Enclosed is a copy of Cascade Pipeline's original request for change order.
Total request for change order (add). ....................................... ....... ....... ......... .$5,802.00
If you should require any ftn1:her information, please don't hesitate to call our office.
1248-RCO..co#2 cascade
(
Gfi.'/1;fOf~~Ceo.~
p.o. Box 1.135 · Merldj,an, Idaho 83680 · Bus; (208) 855-D201 · Fax: (208) 855-0258
REQUEST FOR CHANGE ORDE8,
TO: AMERI.CAN PAVING
ATTN: TERRY LUTZ
PROJECT: MERIDIAN 58 ACRE PARK
DATE:
6/3/2002
CHANGE ORDER: # 2
Revised per completed work.
We hereby request approval of this Change Order for the aboye-mentioned project due to changes and/or
extras as outlined In the following:
MESSAGE: EXPORT UNSUITABLE SOILS AND IMPORT GRANULAR STRUCTURAL FILL (PIT RUN)
ED MERRILL WITH ACHD REQUESTED IMPORT/EXPORT ON THE WATER UN~ TRENCH DUE TO
UNSUITABLE SOilS. .
COST: PlT RUN DELIVERED (SUMMIT STONE) $ 7.89 CY
EXPORT OF TRENCH MATERIAL (SUMMIT STONE) $ 1.25 CY
LOADER 44.50 HR @ 2.5 HRS $ 0.23 Cy
OPERATOR 15.00 HR @ 2.5 HRS $ 0.08 CY
TOTAL CY COST~ $ 9.45 CY
10% MU $0.95 CY
TOTAL CY PRtCE: $10.40 CY
TOTAL YARDAGE OF PIT RUN NEEDED TO STA\3L1ZE THE WATER TRENCH PER ACHD DIRECTION
IS 532.33 CUBIC YARDS. (532_33 CY x $10.40)
TOTAL REQUEST:
$ 5,536.23
TERMS OF PAYMENT; .
SUbject of Terms and Conditions an;! attached hereto, WhiCh are rettereel' to and hereby made part of thIs
Proposal and Contract. All terms of this proposal are to be intergrated with any other contract pertaining
to the same work.' .
ACCEPTED:
Authorized Signature (Contractor)
BY:
BUYER
~/
BY: SELLER
DATE:
DATE:
~~~
Z/Z 'd
19Z0'ON
~dZI:Z ZOOZ '8 'unr
Meridian City Council MeetinQ
Julv 23. 2002
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to
order at 6:30 P.M. on Tuesday, July 23,2002, by Mayor Robert D. Corrie.
Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Bill
Nary, Cherie McCandless.
Others Present: Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Brad Watson, Bill Nichols, and Will
Berg.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd
X Cherie McCandless
X
X Bill Nary
X Keith Bird
Mayor Robert Corrie
Corrie: Hello, I would like to first welcome everybody here this evening.
Also, a particular welcome to the Scouts, Troop 62. They are on their
citizenship badge, to see how the Council works. And I hope that you learn
quite a bit and don't get too discouraged with some of the things you might
hear or think you might hear. So at this time I will open the City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda for Tuesday July 23rd, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. At this
time I would like to have the City Clerk take roll-call attendance, please.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Adoption of the agenda is number two. I would like to ask the
Council if they would like to add under 10-B, discussion of ACHD about the
dissolution question that is coming up before the Ada County Commissioners.
Any ideas of what we might want to do in the next two weeks when they
possibly have the hearing and some of the input to the Ada County
Commissioners.
De Weerd: I have no problem with that.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: On the agenda, also, under the consent agenda, we have item A, order
granting appeal by Walt Morrow. I would like to move that with yours and the
Council's permission to 5-A on the regular agenda and also on the agenda we
will add 10-B, discussion of ACHD. And with those changes, I would move
we adopt the agenda as noted.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 2 of 51
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay, motion has been made and seconded to adopt the agenda as
noted and corrected. Any further discussion? All those in favor say - no lets
have roll-call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Department reports - oh, first -
Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the consent agenda with Item A being
moved to regular agenda 5-A.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and second. Any further discussion? Roll-call
vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New
Position:
Corrie: Now, department reports, Mayor. On the - I guess I left it back on
my desk. But you were wanting to know about the - this was in reference to
code enforcement and the new position. We did have a meeting with Shari
and also Chief Worley in reference to the code enforcement wanting one full
time and two part-time. With their discussions, we came to the conclusion
that Shari will have the full time position of the code enforcement officer in her
office and the two part time will stay with the police department there. What
they will do is - the full time will be on sign ordinances and most of the
Planning and Zoning ordinances. The two part time will take care of weed
control, parking problems and cars that are left on the street. What they also
- Chief you might jump in if you have anything different, is that when they call
in, anyone of them can take the call and they will direct that call to the proper
code enforcement officer so that they don't have to play tag as to who has
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 3 of 51
what. So they will all be aware of what they have to do with their jobs and if
one comes in for signs, if Joe or Fred takes it, they will transfer to them
personally. Anything else, Chief, that I missed on that?
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: One question. Where will it be advertised that the people who have
complaints will be phoning into? Will it be Planning and Zoning or will it be
the police department?
Corrie: I don't know. Did you talk about that? I didn't.
Bird: I think that was one of the biggest things that was confusing. People
didn't know who to call or where to call.
Worley: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Bird. We didn't specifically discuss that. Within
the new police building, we have established a specific number for code
enforcement. It goes right to a voicemail box that is specifically dedicated to
those two. I guess in thinking through this Ad-Hoc, we may publish both
numbers. Both -- one for Planning and Zoning for code enforcement and then
as the Mayor indicated, what Shari and I have agreed to do is we'll direct our
people that when they get a call, when somebody calls the police number and
they have a sign complaint, they wont be told to call this other number, they
will be helped, the information taken by that individual and then passed on
internally. You had - understand I wasn't here but I understand there has
been discussion about coordination and what we have agreed we can
probably do is have internal coordination. The three of them coordinate
activities to funnel the things where they need to go as determined by Shari
and myself.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I am curious. Does one of the things I think we sort of left out in this
discussion, but I don't know what type of vehicles do they use now, are they
going to need another vehicle to be able to get out and investigate and do
that type of thing? I know P & Z had asked for a vehicle but that is for the
planners to use to go out to sites. Is there adequate capability to do that?
Worley: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Nary. We have one car in the police department
that is used by the two part timers because they don't work at the same time.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 4 of 51
Stacy just informed me that there is a car put into the P & Z budget for the full
time position.
De Weerd: The $14,000.00.
Nary: I thought that was the car the planners had requested for the planning
department.
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council, the planner car was in the replacement
capital outlay and this is a - she requested an additional small truck for code
enforcement.
Corrie: Thank you. Any other questions?
Bird: Sounds pretty good to me.
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report:
Corrie: Four B. Finance Department Stacy Kilchenmann.
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council, I am not going to review the financial
statements in detail. Everything looks under budget except a few items that
are on the amendment list, so I am going to go ahead and speak to the
potential amendment list. If you look at the top where we have the enterprise
fund, the two - there are two items we will need to do. An additional item I
wanted to get your permission or approval of, the first one that we spoke
about before, the person that was not added in the budget. We will need to
go ahead and amend the budget and add that person. The second, the
purchase of the park, we will definitely need to transfer that money to the
general fund. Then under items under consideration, the first item. It says
$145,000.00 for Wastewater Treatment Plant for asphalt roadway. What
John would like to do, is in his budget he had $70,000.00 to - in operating to
redo the asphalt of the roadway. Once he actually had someone look at it, it
became not just an operating expense but a major land improvement
because he discovered he will have to take out and replace some of the older
roadway. He would like to move that down into capital, his operating money.
And then move $40,000.00 from his number three generator project which is
in capital outlay, and $35,000.00 from the potable water project, which is also
just referred to on your projects list as Waste Water Treatment Plant city
water and move those into one project to do the asphalt work. So, we would
essentially make an amendment, which would be transferring from operating
to capital. We wouldn't need to make any kind of amendment to move from
project to project. Under the general fund, the first four items we will not need
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 5 of 51
to deal with, with exception of the carry forward budget for the police. That is
in addition to work that didn't get done last year that we anticipated will be
done. So its not changing the overall budget amount. Then, of course, the
addition of the parks land from the enterprise fund. The Chamber restrooms,
the amount you approved that is slightly over budget. The Bear Creek
equipment. We will need to make an amendment for the grant revenue for
the police. But that is just a shift, no real net budget change. Then under
items under consideration, the final item is the codification expense. It is now
$9300.00, so we may need to do that. But we will still be looking at the end at
the administration budget as a total, which may cover that extra amount or it
may not. We will probably wait another month until we know for sure. Are
there any questions on the amendments?
Corrie: Thank you, Stacy.
2. Grant Research Results:
Kilchenmann: The other item I had was - on the grant, you had asked us to
start exploring some, the possibility of using grant revenue and some grant
development. So I started some research. We did a survey and I think you
all have the memo. I won't go over the detail or results of the survey. We
might send it out again or actually contact maybe City of Boise, because we
didn't get a response from them. It appears that most of the people who
responded get grants because they are in economically disadvantaged areas
or the population is economically disadvantaged. So that wouldn't be an area
Meridian would qualify as far as population. It looks like most of our
qualifications would probably be in that we can find in the catalog of federal
assistance or Tom is currently looking at a grant from Water Resources, so in
more general areas. So I think what we can do to take it a step further is at
our next staff meeting we can discuss the major departments, Parks, Police
and Fire and how we can go about having a committee or having some
feedback that we can give to you on how each department looks for grants.
Like in the catalog of federal assistance, I can help them find - access that,
and that website is very easy to find. I think, and this is from my experience
and also from contacting and talking to people who use grants. The biggest
part of the grant is not writing the grant or even finding the grant but
implementing the grant. Getting the planning done so it is incorporated into
the budget. Having a project before you even search for the grant so that you
involve the parts of the community that need to be involved in utilizing the
grant. So those are things that we probably need to talk to as a staff with
those major departments who would utilize grants. I don't think we need to
hire a grant writer. I think we can take care of that in house. Are there any
questions about that?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 6 of 51
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: Stacy, you talked to SAGE. As I understand it they work with
other cities in the area and creating grants from youth based types of grants
to economic development. They not only write them, as I understand, they do
some administration of them in complying to the stipulations attached to the
grants. COMPASS also has a grant writer. As far as we talked at our urban
renewal efforts in interchange beautification and they noted that we could
utilize their staff for things like that. So there are different areas outside of
anything economically disadvantaged that we can be pursuing. Its working
with those types of agencies. I know SAGE has a membership fee attached
to it, but I don't know what that is. I guess I would be interested in further
exploring that. I don't think we need a full time grant writer. But I do think we
need to become more aware of what is out there, in particular, Parks and
beautification type projects and certainly our urban renewal efforts.
(inaudible - tape cuts out)
c. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out
Pre-design, Agreement for Professional Services:
Corrie: -- Public Works Department Brad Watson, Wastewater Facility Plan
Update, Wastewater Build-out Pre-design, Agreement for Professional
Services.
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council members, this item is sort of my pet project
over the last year. This is a contract with Carollo Engineers which is required
by DEQ from time to time in addition to doing a pre-design on the rest of the
waste water plant. In other doubling the capacity out there to what we think is
approximately the twenty year population target. We don't usually have the
consultant come and present anything to you when we bring these
agreements to you. This one, just because of the importance and it was one
of our strategic initiatives and because of the size of the contract, Gary and I
thought it would appropriate if we had them come and show off their
credentials a bit and explain in more detail what the project is all about so that
you have a better comfort level if you decide to approve it. There is a bit of
house keeping on this particular agreement. About a year ago we budgeted
$200,000.00 for this project. We have gone through the request for proposals
process. We had five proposals. We interviewed three of those - Carollo
Engineers, Keller Associates and J-U-B Engineers. After much painstaking
deliberation, they were all very qualified - we chose to negotiate with Carollo.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 7 of 51
We have been doing that for the last two months. The contract that we think
is fair and complete and will cover what we need is $235,000.00. You may
remember that last week we discussed an enhancement that would cover the
remainder of that contract, although that is in the next budget year. Carollo
finished the bio-solids management study about three or four years ago and
last year completed the dewatering project. It was a 1.4 million-dollar
construction project out at the plant. I think with that I would like to turn it
over to Tim Tekippe, who is the project manager and his team, Bill Benko and
Stuart Hurley. They have a very short power point presentation to show you.
If you have any questions feel free to interrupt them or me.
Tekippe: Thank you, Brad. Mayor and Council, we appreciate the
opportunity to present our qualifications for this project and to give you a
better idea of what we plan to provide for you and what benefits to the City of
Meridian will come of our project. I am going to quickly give you a summary
of what I am going to talk about today. I am going to give some quick
introductions to the project team we brought with us tonight and give a brief
overview as Carollo Engineers as a firm. Then we will talk about some
specifics for this facility plan update and pre-design project. At the end I have
some summary slides that summarize the work that has been done out at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant over that last ten years and what we envisioned
will happen construction-wise over the next years as well. Let's see, our
project team I brought tonight, as Brad mentioned, is Bill Benko and he is
going to be coordinating the construction, the pre-design documents, most of
the planning and engineering work. Bill brings over 18 years of experience,
specifically in Wastewater treatment. I, myself, am the project manager and I
have worked with Brad and the Wastewater plant staff very closely for about
the last five years. I have eleven years experience total. Stuart Hurley is a
new addition to our project team. He is interested in the project because,
aside from being a Carollo Engineer, he is also a resident of Meridian. So he
is going to working closely with the staff and ourselves. As a whole, Carollo is
a company. We have 22 offices across the United States. Most of those are
in the Western U.S. We have 500 employees. The Boise office has over 30
employees and we have the largest group of professionals that specialize in
water and wastewater treatment in the Treasure Valley area. Aside from
water and wastewater engineers, we also have structural engineers, electrical
engineers, supporting type engineers. This is a map that shows that of the
major treatment plants, treatment plants at large cities such as San
Francisco, Los Angeles, and Portland. We worked at nine of the fourteen
largest plants of the Western U.S. We can add a plant in Las Vegas that we
recently completed. We have started to work in the Seattle area also. We
are happy to say we can bring some big city expertise. What is not shown on
this map are the numerous smaller communities, where we do work as well.
What does all this mean? How can we benefit the city with our qualifications?
We specialize in wastewater treatment. That enables us to bring the newest
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 8 of 51
technologies together with our seventy-year company history of experience to
the table for a project like this. We have proven our ability - Brad mentioned
bio-solids, dewatering project. That was a very successful design and
construction project out at the plant. So I think we have proven we can work
well together with the city staff. You are going to benefit by the evaluation of
the newest technology and our experience and our teaming relationship with
the city staff. We have local engineers that we have introduced here tonight
who will champion the project and help to bring it to fruition. I am going to
quickly give an overview of the planning and pre-design memorandums and
documents that we are going to prepare. Bill will talk in a bit more detail and
then after that I will summarize some of the costs that go along with this.
What we had proposed to Gary and Brad and the Wastewater plant staff, was
a project where we subdivide the process areas out at the treatment plant into
eight separate technical memorandum. We concentrate on each of those
process areas and determine the best solution for that. Then at the end we
will bring those all together and summarize those in a final report that is
acceptable and will be approved by state DEQ. This will allow you to get into
their system for the state revolving loan fund, which can provide money for
design and construction of your improvements at low interest rates. This is a
list of the eight memos and the facility plan report at the end. I will turn the
microphone quickly over to Bill who will give us more details on these.
Benko: The scope of work for professional services is for a comprehensive
facility plan. The plant has been divided into these eight areas and we will
prepare a technical memorandum for the areas that encompass the liquid
stream all the way through the treatment process as well as the solids and
residuals management. The technical memorandums are compiled and
summarized at the end into the facility plan that is submitted to DEQ. This
slide is an example of what goes into a technical memorandum. This
example we are using was one that was specifically completed for the City of
Meridian. There is a plant area. We start off with an investigation and a site
visit to really understand the existing facilities. Now technical memoranda are
interactive with the city's staff. We start and review the existing facilities and
then we will scratch our head and come up with some initial technical ideas.
We meet with city staff regularly through this process to share what we are
finding and get their input. As we progress, we develop alternatives always
including reviewing the existing facilities on how we can optimize those and
make the most of their use. We identify new alternatives. We establish
criteria to select and review those alternatives and come down with a short
list, meet with the city further and identify the best approach. Under the
scope of our contract there are two main deliverables that come with each
stage and with each technical memorandum. The technical memoranda itself
is a conceptual design. How do we approach this? then we take that and
develop it even further into the preliminary design. We use a rule of thumb of
about thirty percent complete. So, we prepare actual drawings that show how
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 9 of 51
the facilities area going to look, how they layout, what kind of equipment.
The preliminary design permits you to quickly complete the detail design and
respond to construction either as priorities come up or as a whole project.
Now this slide shows the flow of the whole comprehensive facility plan.
Concurrently while we are addressing the nuts and bolts in the technical
memoranda, we also work with the state DEQ to identify the environmental in
the documentation associated with that. Even though this is a project that
addresses water quality, we need to make sure that our development doesn't
impact some other area of land use or the environment. So we work with
DEQ in planning, sharing the findings of the technical memoranda.
Ultimately, we work to achieve the findings of non-significant impact, which in
general provides for approval of the construction of the treatment plant
expansion. The facilities plan along the way includes public participation
process. Also for the state revolving loan funds, Idaho has funds that are
available at about a four percent interest rate to help with the design and
construction of these improvements. So in January or February, you will take
what is known from the draft facility plan and submit a letter of interest to
DEQ. DEQ looks at all the interested applicants, develops a priority list for
the funding spending for that year and then issues the intended use plan for
that years spending. To be considered with your participation in the revolving
loan fund is how quickly construction needs to happen. There is no
guarantee that you are going to get funding the same year you express
interest in funding because there are other communities out there expressing
interest so DEQ looks at needs and develops the priority list. If you don't get
selected for funding that year, you stay on the list waiting for those projects
higher on the list to get completed and you would move into the range of
fundable projects. The facilities plan, the comprehensive wastewater
document and the findings go in to support your strategic plan. Of course,
Meridian growth is the critical issue. The other issues are meeting stricter
regulations. There is a lot of water quality analysis going on and regulations
continue to evaluate on whether our streams are clean enough in their
present condition. The Boise River and the Snake River have been studying
the nutrient impact. Nutrients are typical nitrogen and phosphorus and how
those pollutants affect water quality. So if there is a water quality study that
changes the treatment requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus, that may
have a design and cost impact on the construction. Also with waste water
treatment plants, its very difficult these days to have your treatment plant out
on the edge of town away from development. The city of Meridian has always
been a good neighbor with their Wastewater Treatment Plant. We will
continue to develop these TM's with this spirit in mind. Some examples of
that are an efficient foot print on the land use and profile of the treatment
plant. Perhaps truck traffic in and out of the treatment plant. Noise. You
haven't had any issues with odors from the treatment plant up until now, and
we will continue to develop those facilities in that spirit. This shows the
general schedule of the technical stages in the facility plan. Basically, we will
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 10 of 51
work through the later part of this year, working with the plant staff, to review
the existing conditions and identify what is needed for the next growth cycle
from the technical point of view. Then once the technical matters are
prepared in a draft form, we will submit that with DEQ. The public
participation steps will be set up and worked out with the city. Then, this will
put you in position to at least express interest in submitting for the 2003
revolving loan fund and getting in line at least for the funding. And I will return
to Tim now to summarize.
Tekippe: Thanks, Bill. This particular slide is a brief summary of what has
been happening over the last ten years with the Wastewater Treatment Plant
in Meridian. Much to the credit of the Mayor and Council, Gary, Brad and
their staff, the treatment plant that serves the City of Meridian, has really got
the highest quality water, the most advanced treatment of any plant in the
area. With the incredible growth that you have experienced, you have really
done a good job in staying ahead of the growth curve and planning and
completing projects so that there have been no water quality violations. So
of course our plan is to continue that trend. If you look at the numbers, 1992,
there was about 2.5 million gallons per day of capacity at the treatment plant.
That size was doubled over ten years, which - that is right up there with the
fastest growing cities in the nation. There was several projects and I am sure
you remember most of those projects that happened out at the treatment
plant but there was a total of eight projects that the construction and
engineering costs total about nine million dollars to double the plant. The cost
of engineering is about 20 percent of that. So we wanted to give you these
numbers to relate what the current project and current plan will bring. This
says that in the next ten years, more upgrades are going to be required to
accommodate growth and accommodate these new nutrient requirements
that the state is bringing in an attempt to clean up the rivers in our state to a
higher degree. We are talking about increasing the capacity, almost doubling
it again and meeting those stricter limits. This is an order of magnitude cost
estimate that Brad and I came up with before we do the study. That is the
purpose of the study, to figure out what we need to build and how much it is
going to cost. So I wanted to present this number to give you an order of
magnitude on what we are talking about here. Rather than the previous
projects where the pre-design was done for each individual project, we are
going to do that all together in one large project at one time. This is a
summary of the engineering costs and the current contract that is before you
tonight is $235,000.00 and that is approximately $110,000.00 for the planning
study, to update the wastewater master plan. Then the $125,000.00 for
preparation of the pre-design drawings for each of these components of the
plan. So, that $235,000.00 is approximately two percent of the future
construction cost. That is in line with the industry standards for engineering
planning. Once this is complete further down the road there will be phases
where we do final designs and construction management of the individual
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 11 of 51
projects. At that time, depending on growth and regulations from the state,
you all can decide to do that as one large project, two medium size projects or
several smaller projects. So I will quickly summarize. As a firm, Carollo has
national expertise in wastewater treatment. We have some good local
engineering support to champion your project. We have a proven successful
record in doing planning and design projects for the city. The goal really for
this facility plan and pre-design is to map the required improvements out at
the plant for the next ten years and beyond that. So with that, I would like to
conclude our presentation and invite any questions and comments.
Corrie: Thank you. That was a nice presentation. Council, any questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd. I guess you touched on this - DEQ and some other
environmental agencies are making a lot of stricter regulations and that sort of
thing. How do you anticipate that and are they kind of giving you a heads up
of what might come down the road aways? I guess that is always the huge
challenge of a city is anticipating those regulations and making sure we are
prepared for them.
Tekippe: Yes, and I think Brad has been involved and Bill has, with the state
DEQ and monitoring their progress for regulations. There is a study, the draft
has been completed for the Snake River Hells Canyon total maximum daily
load. That is kind of an evaluation of that particular area of the river and the
amount of nutrients and other pollutants, if you will, that it can accept without
impairing the quality of the water body. So that report has been completed in
draft form - is that, Brad, still out for public comment?
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council, it is my understanding that it still is. We
have prepared comments in coordination with Boise City. We have been
involved in this for three or four or five years. It began with the effluent
trading program that was funded by EPA. We participated in that pilot
program for years. Very early on, we knew what could happen. Anything that
was proposed to us at that time could only get better. They gave us the
darkest hour scenario at that time. We have kind of had that in the back of
our minds the whole time. Really the only pollutant that really impacts us is
phosphorus. The others are non-point source problems.
De Weerd: I guess looking regionally, I know our city participates in those
kinds of forums, but for example, the new septic tank requirements. How is
this going to impact that? That has a rural impact but, in essence, I can see
where that will have some effects in the municipal system in having to pick up
some of that. I guess when we do this plan, as much as we can anticipate, I
would like to see us a part of that. I do appreciate the breadth of your
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 12 of 51
experience and some of the larger systems that it looks like you worked with.
I know in the Seattle area, they are composting some of their waste and
actually selling it to the public. Those are the kind of things I hope to see in
these kinds of plans, things you can do.
Watson: Council member De Weerd, Mayor and Council. Coincidentally you
mention that - the bio-solids management study that Carollo did for us, their
initial project for us, that was the very focus of that study. That was at the
direction of a former Council member that we initiated that portion - the
composting portion of the study. They took a very hard look at it, and at that
point in time with our production, it was not economically viable. Part of the
scope of this project is to reopen that management study and look at that
again.
De Weerd: I would hope so. I am glad to hear that. Good deal.
Corrie: Any other questions? I am happy to say that ex-Councilman is here
tonight too. Are there any other questions from Council on the request of
Brad for the recommendation to agree with the Carollo Engineers, not to
exceed $235,000.00? Okay. If anybody would like to make a motion for that,
I would welcome that.
Bird: I would move that we approve the agreement with Carollo Engineers for
facility plan update and treatment plant build out pre-design on a time and
material basis not to exceed the amount of $235,000 and authorize the Mayor
sign and the City Clerk to attest.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion been made and seconded. Is there any further
discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Clerk. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Corrie: Okay. Thank you, gentlemen. Nice job.
Watson: Thank you, Mayor and Council members.
2. Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees: Set Public
Hearing for new fees
Watson: Mayor and Council members, the item that we have is a discussion
of the Wastewater Treatment Program proposed fees. I had delivered to you,
hopefully, today a copy of a memo from me briefly describing those fees, as
well as, a pertinent part of the ordinance and a very poor copy of a draft
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 13 of 51
resolution. With me tonight to help answer any questions on this is Celeste
Vialet. I can never pronounce that quite right. She's our pre-treatment
manager out at the Wastewater Plant. I'm going to just briefly run through
some of these fees and please interrupt me if there's any questions. These
were developed similar to the Public Works review and inspection fees based
on typical vehicle, personnel and equipment costs. The first three fees listed
on-first of all, I want to make sure you all have that documentation. Is that
true? Okay. Thank you. The first three fees listed on there are review and
inspection fees. The first bullet point is a pre-treatment application fee in new
commercial construction. That is-often times we get a building permit that's
just a shell with no tenants in it. Those still have to be reviewed for pre-
treatment issues and future pre-treatment, planning connections. The second
bullet point is a tenant improvement, where somebody actually moves in and
the type of establishment has to be evaluated for pre-treatment issues. The
third bullet point is a follow up inspection fee. The commercial accounts are
set up on a grease and interceptor pumping schedule and they are supposed
to send the results or verification of that pumping procedure at a pre-
determined schedule. If they do not get that, then the pre-treatment have to
go out and physically inspect it to make sure that that has been done, will be
done. The second category under sampling fee is intended to recover costs
associated with the pre-treatment staff going out and actually sampling the
discharge from a commercial or industrial account. This is normally only
required when either there is somebody who is chronically in violation. At this
point, from what I understand and maybe Celeste can help me out on this, in
the future with expected pre-treatment rules, this will become a mandatory
task of the pre-treatment staff on-
*** End of Side One ***
Watson: --accounts. The third category is surveillance. This is one that I had
to have explained to me several times. This is intended to recover costs from
investigations initiated for probable cause. In other words, is there's a
petroleum odor that somebody notices from a sewer system and they call the
Wastewater Department and they have to go out and figure out who is
actually contributing that, gasoline, diesel, whatever it is. The time that
they're out there determining that is reimbursed by the person that they might
eventually find in violation of the ordinance. Celeste has a very good
anecdote on that if you're interested in hearing it. I can't remember it all. The
fourth category under permits is fairly self-explanatory. EPA requires that
significant industrial users and there's a long list of what constitutes a
significant industrial user. They must be permitted. It's almost similar to the
City issuing a MPDES discharge permit to an industrial user. Those fees are
not determined at the time of application because until it's reviewed during the
building permit application process, we don't know what they're discharging.
It's sort of a catch twenty-two. So, what we've proposed is that-best case
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 14 of 51
scenario, when something came in for a conditional use permit, we could
evaluate that. That doesn't always happen. Most of the time, it's going to be
a project that doesn't require a CUP and then, we'll have to determine the
magnitude of what that permit would be during the building permit stage.
That fee would be payable prior to building permit issuance. The minor
industrial user is similar. I think the only things that's changed on that is the
frequency. Yes. Then, the final bullet point under permits is a septic haulers
permit. This one is very self-explanatory. It's for septic haulers that
discharge at the Wastewater Plant. It's just so they can keep track of who's
licensed. I don't know if it's licensed or who has a permit with the City. That
is all of them. We'd be happy to answer any questions you might have on
these.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I've got one question for Celeste. On your hourly figure, you're figuring
it $17.34 an hour based on a $3,000 a month employee and $3,000 is the
gross, I'm sure. So, I think that's a little cheap if you're paying somebody
$3,000 a month and then you add about 30-35% for benefits. That employee
is probably costing you pretty close to $19 to $20 and hour.
Vialet: That's very true. We tried to be a little bit generous with these figures
until we got this program up and rolling so that it's not a shock to the public
because they're not used to having these fees. So, we were trying to be a
little bit generous to see how this ran and maybe give us a little bit more room
in the future to change them to accommodate for those things.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: How will this be enforced? I know probably some of this should
be tied to a business license. How are you going to know about this? I guess
you only know about it through building permits and PI's but we'll realize a
number of people will fall through the cracks unless they're going for one or
the other.
Vialet: That's very true. Without a business license, we go on search and
destroy missions and if they don't file for a tenant improvement, a lot of times
in the older part of downtown Meridian, you have these existing older homes.
They just move in one day and you've got a new business. They could be
electroplating down in the basement and with all those heavy metals, that
does impact our sewage system. So, without them filing for a permit and no
business license, it's anybody's guess, unfortunately. So, if they file for
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 15 of 51
tenant improvement or a building permit of some kind, that's how we find
them. Business licenses would definitely help us in this aspect. There's no
doubt about it. I hope that answered your question.
De Weerd: Kind of. Have you narrowed the list of businesses that you want
licenses for?
Vialet: Well, we can't, really, because, for an example, there's a donut shop
back east and they went to go and inspect it because they're discharging fats,
oils, and grease. The gal said well, what does this door go to and he said oh,
that just goes into my other room and she said well, what do you do in that
other room and he said oh, I electroplate all the chrome stuff, do all the
chroming for all the display racks and she's like, you what? So, without
knowing to the full extent of what every business does, we have no idea.
They could be manufacturing cosmetics and that's fine but they could also
need to be permitted because they're discharging so much more waste. The
criteria is derived from EPA, that tells you who has to be permitted. In order
for us to get to that point, we need to know what people are doing in their
businesses and we don't know right now. So, it's just kind of-we do a
survey every two years. We get every name out of the phone book. We go
pretty much door to door. When we're out driving around, we make a list of
every single business and their address and we start canvassing them that
way.
De Weerd: So, I imagine, we'll see something come up with the business
license in the near future maybe?
Vialet: I hope.
Corrie: We've talked about this a long time. Maybe we'll get it done. We
have enough people who want to do it. I think so. I'd like to see it myself, just
certain ones, so you can have these things not slipping through the cracks.
It's pretty costly when they do. Any other questions?
Watson: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Yes.
Watson: Thank you. At this point, we just wanted to bring this up for
discussion. I think the next step would be to schedule the resolution for
adoption. The one thing that I forgot to point out is that most of these fees
that I've brought to you, we've had a revenue projection, we're really only
projecting about 10% of the pre-treatment program would be funded by these
fees at this point. Just like the Public Works review and inspection fees, we
want to get this in place for a year, see how it functions, see what the
problems are, find out what the actual revenues are and update as
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 16 of 51
necessary. This by no means is intended to fund the whole pre-treatment
program.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols, correct me if I'm wrong, but this will take a public hearing,
is that correct?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. These are new fees and,
therefor, they would require a public hearing. They satisfy that definition of
being more than 5%. If I may ask a question of Brad and Celeste. I see this
resolution, and now I know why I remember seeing some of these numbers
before or at least the categories. We did this quite awhile ago. Have the
numbers changed from-I can't really tell from the draft copy. It didn't come
through the fax machine very well.
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council members, and Mr. Nichols. I don't think they've
changed at all.
Nichols: Okay. Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. If you just let us know,
obviously, when the hearing is going to be sufficiently in advance ahead of
time, we'll have a resolution prepared along the lines of the proposed fees
and, of course, we can modify those if after the public hearing you change
any of those fees. We can at least have a draft ready to go.
Corrie: Okay. Does Council wish to have the City Clerk set up a public
hearing time on this? Mr. Clerk, if you'll set a date as close as you can for a
public hearing on this one.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: One thing that has been helpful in the past, Brad, is when you
show us also what surrounding communities are doing, kind of a comparison
chart. If you could do that, it would be helpful, especially, at the public
hearing.
Watson: Sure. I'm sure Celeste would be able to get her hands on that very
quickly. We can do that.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Watson: Thank you.
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 17 of 51
Corrie: All right. The next item moved from the consent agenda is Item A,
which was tabled from April 23rd, 2002, order granting appeal AP 01-00 stop
work order at 2340 W. Franklin Road by Walt Morrow. So, we will hear that
one now. I guess we can start with Walt. Walt, do you want to start? I'm
trying to review this in all this time and maybe you can bring us up to what
we're doing here and by the staff and comments too.
Morrow: I'm Walt Morrow, 2340 W. Franklin Road in Meridian. Where we're
at here is this project has been delayed at my request until now. Where we
left the project in November was, essentially, that in terms of the history of the
thing, I had submitted plans and specs for a building permit, the same
process that I had used with four other building permits over the last 20 years
at this location. We picked up a building permit October 2ih of 1999, started
construction in 2001, ten months later, had a stop work order for extensively
P & Z issues. We did (inaudible) our first meeting between myself and the
Council and had discussion concerning those issues with the Council on
October 2nd, did approve the rescinding of the stop work order and the project
to go ahead and proceed. At that particular time-I'm sorry. A couple of
meetings later, with the Findings of Facts and Conclusions came out for
approval, there were several incorrect areas in that and I asked for those to
be corrected. Then, Councilman Anderson asked questions with respect to
Fire Department issues. I was not able to answer those questions in terms of
the plan review process. We had scheduled another meeting (inaudible)
appeared and answered the Councils questions with respect to the process
that he used. He indicated that the process had not included Skip, in terms of
Skip reviewing those plans and specs for that project. The following meeting,
it was determined that Councilman Anderson wanted a review by the Fire
Department, which I agreed to. Then, from that point on, I had asked for the
issue to be tabled until now. So, that's the history of where we've been.
Where we're at now is the Fire Department did issue a plan review. The plan
review is based on an industrial building. The reality is that the requirements
of the USC and their classification of the building are different than the
requirements for the Fire Department and their classification of the building. It
is a building that is not to be used other than by me. It's not for rent, not for
lease, not for sale. It's a storage building for things that I currently have
stored on my property that are out in the elements. The review by the Fire
Department, apparently, they weren't aware that the building already exists
on the site in terms of structural things that they're suggesting and the review
is not possible. It's a pre-engineered steel building. It's a package and it is
there. There were issues raised about water. There is no City water within
that location. There's no storage capacity for water. So, those were the
issues that were raised by the review of the Fire Department. Where we're at
for tonight is to answer questions that the Council may have of me.
Obviously, the staff, if there's a representative from the Fire Department here,
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 18 of 51
he can review or answer questions that you may have in terms of their review
of the project. So, having said that, are there any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Walt, have you read the order granting appeal overruling Planning
and Zoning Director's denial of application. The last one says 10-02-01.
Morrow: Yes.
Corrie: Okay.
Morrow: That was the night that the Council passed the appeal and then the
Findings of Facts and Conclusions came a couple two or three weeks later.
There were some things on those that were inaccurate that I requested to be
changed and subsequently were.
Corrie: I guess the question is, do you or do you not agree with the
comments and requirements? It sounds like you don't.
Morrow: I don't agree, very candidly. From one perspective, the building was
bought and paid for and delivered to the job site so there's nothing from a
structural engineering standpoint that can be done to qualify in terms of
construction. The building has divider walls and an area of separation. On
agricultural, if it's classified as an agricultural usage building, then the
requirements are remarkably different from an industrial building. I think it
was also stated by Don Whitman, that in the County this particular type of
project is not even permitted through a permit process for agricultural stuff.
We can't do to the building what some of the suggestions are with respect to
the Fire Department makes. It's physically impossible to do. As everyone
knows, there's no City water at this location and I think the implication by their
rating that there's a 40,000 gallon storage or pool of water. That's not a
possible thing to do either.
Corrie: Is that zoned RUT or is that-no, that's City limits.
Morrow: That's City limits. Remember, it's zoned light industrial. It's
agricultural by grandfather rights and by usage.
Corrie: Okay. Any other questions from Council?
De Weerd: We probably need to hear from staff.
Corrie: Yes, we will. I will have someone get you back here. All right. Staff
comments, please.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 19 of 51
Watson: Shari, do you want to start? Or Joe?
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I could add a little bit of history to
it. The building permit was received without any review by the Planning and
Zoning department. Part of Mr. Whitman's response to that was because he
considered it an agricultural building. Our response was that it was not an
agricultural zone. Everything on there is already non-conforming so, therefor,
any expansion of that use would have to be done through a Conditional Use
Permit. It was initially brought to our attention by the Fire Chief, Kenny
Bowers, who's father lives out near there and he wanted to know why they
received a permit for that when they had no water out there. So, the stop
work order was put on the building because there was no fire flow for a
building of that size. The use wasn't permitted. There was no certificate of
zoning compliance. It did not meet what our ordinance would require in terms
of a building permit for landscaping or setbacks or those types of things.
Initially, it came down to the Council only wanted to consider the life safety
issues of the building and that's why they had the Fire Department do their
review and come up with their response to the issuance of the permit. That's
kind of where it stayed. I guess Mr. Silva has some comments as well.
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I wanted to just kind of brief you
on the plan review that had been requested that I perform on the project. The
project was already underway when I came on board as the Fire Marshall.
Two different things. I was requested to review it as, if it was in the City, there
was one thing-what I wanted to clarify is that it was plan reviewed as a
storage building and not as an industrial building, as Mr. Morrow had
indicated. So, it was never indicated to us it was going to be used for
anything other than as a storage building so that was how it was plan
reviewed, in a light industrial setting. That would require a single fire hydrant,
given the type of construction. Another option that was provided to Mr.
Morrow for consideration was whether or not, if it was treated in fact as an
agricultural building, a farm storage building, whether or not we could take an
approach similar to what we do in the county, where we have a stand-alone
agricultural building where water supply is just provided on site in the form of
a tank. We categorized the building, quote unquote, as a farm storage
building used for dairy barns and equipment (inaudible), which I felt was an
appropriate classification for the building. That would be another option of on-
site storage if it didn't seem feasible at all to extend water to the site. So,
essentially, that's what the plan review process was all about with some other
miscellaneous requirements but that was the gist of the plan review that was
conducted by the Fire Department on the project.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 20 of 51
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: So, Joe, if we deal with it like it's a rural building, an agricultural
building and these are in your memo are the requirements you would ask of
any storage unit like this would have to comply with?
Silva: Correct. Within the City limits, typically, this project would be classified
as a storage facility, which is what Mr. Morrow had indicated, and would
require one fire hydrant within 500 feet of the project.
De Weerd: Now, if I remember right, when Councilman Anderson had
brought this up, his concern was also if we don't put out these requirements,
the City would be liable in case of a fire, in case anything happened. Is that-
is my recall correct?
Silva: Correct. A couple of things. One of the issues that potentially could
come up is that when Mr. Morrow approaches his insurance agent for
insurance, one of the concerns that they will express in all likelihood will be
the availability of fire hydrants in close proximity within acceptable, you know,
300 to 400 to 500 feet of the project. So, that would be one question that
would probably be posed to Mr. Morrow once he completed the project
(inaudible). The insurance probably would pose the question of what's the
available water supply for that project. That's going to be the concern
downstream that will have to be dealt with. The other issue, quite possibly,
would be the setting of a precedent where a commercial building, as
considered by Planning and Zoning, is granted a building permit for a project
within the City without available water supply, municipal service.
De Weerd: But, what is our liability in case of a fire? I can't remember. I
didn't bring my file tonight on all of the discussion we've had already on this
but it seems to me that Councilman Anderson's primary concern was the
City's liability if we approve this, what we are actually liable for.
Silva: Potentially, we have adopted a fire code in the City and we would be
caught in the situation where we had plan reviewed a project and not followed
those guidelines that had been established by previous Councils when the
uniform fire code, the 1997 Uniform Fire Code, which is the fire code currently
in place in the City, we would not be following our own rules and we have a
project here that it's been brought to our attention where we have not stood
by those requirements as the project has gone through the City process.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 21 of 51
De Weerd: I guess I have a question for Walt. The Fire Department is giving
you two different options. One, if we treat this as a building that applies to the
City ordinances versus the rural water supply. Can you do either? I know we
can't get a fire hydrant out there. We don't have the water flow. But, can you
do the rural water supply requirements that he has outlined in his memo?
Morrow: I think his memo indicates 40,000 gallons. It's a huge water
reservoir. Very candidly, there's a couple of issues here. One is that my
insurance man rates the building simply as rural. There's not an issue with
the location of a fire hydrant, in terms of that. It's a ratings issue. The second
issue is that this very building that you're sitting in has a variance from the
Uniform Fire Code. So, there's more than ample precedence for that. It was
done by the Council when this building was built. So, there's ample
precedence. I think the building is now some ten or twelve years old. So,
that type of thing has been used before by the Council to handle these issues.
Quite candidly, I don't know what a 40,000 gallon storage facility would cost,
whether it's an in the ground facility or above ground facility. I can't tell you
the answer to that. I know that 40,000 gallon milk silos are very expensive.
De Weerd: Well, if this is a requirement that they put on anyone who is
putting up a rural or agricultural use, why are we exempting one property
and-why don't we just change the code, if it's not practical to do?
Morrow: Well, I would suggest to you, that there are plenty of indoor riding
arenas and stuff like that that are two and three times the size of this building
that have neither sprinkler systems or fire storage or whatever. They're all
through the county. I can't answer your question. I don't know how that's
handled. It may vary from fire district to fire district but that's the reality.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Go ahead.
Corrie: I was going to say, we're talking about what Mr. Anderson said back
on August 215t of 2001, he said, in my opinion, we're not absolved from still
having that liability if there's a life safety issue there. He didn't want the
building permits granted even after the building was built, has been there ten
years, that issue doesn't go away. We're still responsible for it. I think you
were asking what his verbiage was there. Mr. Bird.
Bird: Joe, is this the same requirements that if we have a dairy farm come in
or anything like this that they have to, and the rural transition within our
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 22 of 51
impact area, that you've covered, do you require 40,000 gallon tank out there
on a dairy farm?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Bird. That would be correct. This would
be the uniform requirement if we were approached with a similar project in the
rural. We've classified it as a farm storage building, which that's the
indication that Mr. Morrow had indicated the use was going to be. That would
be the requirement for it. For example, at the Shaeffer View Estates project
off Meridian Road, they just put in a 30,000-gallon water tank underground
and we're in the final stages of accepting that water supply for a series of
single family homes. I believe there's about 20 lots there. I'm not sure about
the number of lots but that's approximately the number of lots in that
subdivision.
Bird: Yes, but, you're talking about a residential living thing against a storage
place that you have maternity cows. You might be in there one or two hours
a day at the most. You've got a storage in there that you're going to be in and
out of. It isn't as if somebody is living or working in there. 40,000 gallons is a
lot of water. I can understand it if you're out in a subdivision that has this and
you're going to have families living in a house and you don't have water. I
disagree with Mr. Anderson on the point of liability on the City. If that's the
truth, everyone of these old buildings or that's been passed under the code
without going, that don't have panics on every exit door or don't have this, the
City's liable and I don't think they are. I think that if Mr. Morrow was going to
set a shop up in there, have occupants in it. I would have no problem with it
because I understand, his application, about 50% to 60% of it is going to be
for a maternity ward for his calves and cows and the other is going to be
storage for his equipment. I don't believe he's going to run an office or
anything out of it. That's something you guys can check quite a bit, I think.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. Morrow, I guess one of the things I didn't hear or didn't see in the
information is what's your alternative? I mean, what do you propose to do?
Nothing?
Morrow: There is no alternative. We have a situation where it's not
economically feasible, obviously, to extend water and so on and so forth. The
40,000-gallon capacity, in terms of storage, quite candidly, I don't know that
that's even feasible. I don't know that it isn't but the whole concept of the
building was, had the requirements been there in the first place when it went
through the process, I would not have built the building. That makes the
building way too expensive for the purposes that it's going to serve. It just
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 23 of 51
doesn't make sense to spend, at that point, almost $200,000 to store stuff.
You can rent a lot of square footage for a long, long time for that kind of
money.
Nary: So, would it be fair to say, Mr. Morrow, I guess, your concern or your
beef here is the fact that these requirements are being imposed after the fact,
after you were given the building permit, after you were already in the design
and plan and everything else. If you had been told these up front, you surely
would have altered the design, altered your plans, or done something
differently.
Morrow: I wouldn't have built the building, wouldn't have even come close.
Nary: Okay. Thank you.
Morrow: Other questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess just one. If you are to provide a water supply in case of a
fire, what are your plans? You don't have any plans?
Morrow: I'm not sure I understand the question.
De Weerd: Do you have plans to have water available to fight a fire if it
should happen?
Morrow: The answer would be no, not at this time. It would be the same as
the building immediately to the west of me that's approximately the same
square footage that has no water source either.
De Weerd: That's Maple Grove RV.
Morrow: Maple Grove RV. That building was built some ten years ago and
was permitted by (inaudible) concrete and (inaudible) who built the building.
De Weerd: That was approved by the County.
Morrow: No. That was approved by the City. That's been in the City since
1980.
De Weerd: And it was built after it was put in the City?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 24 of 51
Morrow: Yes, about ten years ago.
De Weerd: Did we not have a uniform fire code at that time?
Corrie: We did.
De Weerd: And we ignored it then?
Corrie: We also refused to let the RV do any more building or anything else
with their Conditional Use Permit because of the fire-
Morrow: I think part of what the testimony, Bob, was that he was asking to
weld and do other kinds of light manufacturing processes within the building.
Corrie: But, he was also asking for a CUP to sell trailers and that and
because of the water supply and that, he still couldn't get it. I mean, I'm trying
to find a correlation here. You don't have water, if you have a fire in your
house and if we allow this, you don't have water, if you have a fire at that
shed and lose your house, you're still not going to save your house. We're
getting in deeper here, to me.
Morrow: I've already been through that process once.
Corrie: I know you have. To me, if you're in the City limits and that's the
ruling now, if you're in the City limits why don't we follow the City rules. I'm
finding it hard to understand. Yes, you're going to use it for a calving barn but
if there's a fire there, we've got to be able to put it out. (inaudible)
Morrow: If there's a fire there now, it's the same situation.
Corrie: You're in the City limits now.
Morrow: I know I'm in the City limits.
Corrie: You're building in the City limits and it's a new building. Do we need
to go by our present codes now since it's being built now, rather than ignoring
them and let it go ahead and be built without fire protection? For me, I don't
see that it's a good thing for us or you, either.
Morrow: I understand what you're saying but the point is that it was all
approved and construction began under the criteria by which it was approved.
The precedence is also that the building of approximately the same size
immediately to the west of me was built ten years ago with the same criteria.
Once again, had I known that the cost of the building was going to be driven
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 25 of 51
up by additional requirements at the very front end, the project would have
been dropped at that point.
Corrie: Did you not ask what the requirements were now as far as building
that building?
Morrow: This was the fifth building permit that I submitted for on that
property. I've had four permits there before through three different mayoral
administrations. The requirements have come back the same each and every
time. The current building department issued three of those, what would be
five permits.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Walt, what is the construction on the building? What is it? Is it block,
steel, or what?
Morrow: It's a combination of block and steel.
Bird: Block four feet high and steel on up?
Morrow: That's correct.
Bird: Wood or steel rafters?
Morrow: It's all steel.
Bird: All steel rafters. Any sheet rock?
Morrow: The divider walls are steel, two by six studs, with sheet rock, five
eighths sheet rock on each side.
Bird: Double sheet rock? Five eighths inch fire rated?
Morrow: I believe what he called for was five eighths sheet rock on each
side, one layer.
Bird: And all the way to the roof?
Morrow: All the way to the pan, the (inaudible) pan.
Bird: Joe, on a construction like that, what is going to burn? Are you putting
any insulation in the steel part of it?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 26 of 51
Morrow: That's correct. It's insulated under the skin, the steel skin.
Bird: Is that flammable? Joe, what is the track record on those kind of
buildings for fire?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Bird. Typically, it's quite obvious that steel
doesn't burn, per se. The contents, which can be very variable and be some
very high dollar farm equipment, for example, and some of the livestock that
may be present. I'm not familiar with the going price per pound but I mean,
those are the type things that the contents do in fact burn and they do cause
significant losses. We had a hay fire, for example, just the other day in Kuna.
There was $250,000 loss in just hay outside. I know that Mr. Morrow has,
you know, antique vehicles and I'm sure that may be one thing he may store
there. I'm not sure, whatever he deems appropriate for his storage building.
But, those are high dollar items and those things do in fact burn because
some of the components are petro-chemicals or they're, you know, equipment
that Mr. Morrow may choose to store as a result of his business and
construction. I mean, just miscellaneous construction things that do in fact
burn. I agree with you, the building is, in fact, not going to burn. We refer to it
as a type three non-rated.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Walter, are you going to have heating in it?
Morrow: No.
Bird: What kind of electrical?
Morrow: Just lights and 110.
Bird: 110? Any plumbing?
Morrow: No. Well, some water spigots for water troughs.
Bird: Well, for the interior but you're not going to have sewer, water and
sewer.
Morrow: No. There's no sewer out there. It stops at Interstate 84.
Bird: I forgot about that. Lights would be the only thing electrical you'd have
in there. Some plug ins, I'm sure.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 27 of 51
Morrow: Lights and some plug ins for water heaters.
Bird: No 220? Nothing for welding?
Morrow: No. No welding.
Bird: Okay.
McCandless: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: Will your home and your office out there, they're supplied water
by a well? Is it a well?
Morrow: That's correct. It's a four-inch well.
McCandless: It's what?
Morrow: It's a four-inch well. A four-inch well, when they converted to water,
that was the biggest they built. Now, you can do six-inch wells for domestic
stuff. It's a four inch well and a half horse power pump.
McCandless: So, your building is too far away to be serviced by that well.
Morrow: Well, it would have a spigot, you know, frost free hydrants inside the
building that would come from that well. Does that answer your question?
The four inch well was probably drilled somewhere in the last 40's, early 50's.
In terms of our sewer system out there, we still have the original outhouse on
the property.
McCandless: Okay.
Morrow: And it's nice. But, having said that, the well is only 48 inches deep.
It has a half horse-power pump, ten gallon per minute capability. The static
water level is at 28 feet. So, it's capable of supplying domestic needs and
that's about it. That's what it was designed for.
McCandless: So, there would be no chance of making that well deeper or
putting in a higher pump or something of that sort so that could service more
on the property? Your building that we're talking about.
Morrow: Well, the building that we're talking about would just have one line
coming off of an existing line and have frost free hydrant for water supply to
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 28 of 51
stock water and that kind of thing. In terms of increasing the capacity of the
well, no. I don't know that there's even equipment that's capable of extending
four-inch wells. I think everything now, the minimum size is six-inch wells,
which would cost to drilling an entirely new well system. My neighbor across
the street just did one and they were at 128 feet with a six-inch well and that
was for domestics. If this well were to go bad and I have to drill a new well,
then I would drill a six-inch well to a domestic water level, which would be
about the same as the neighbor across the street.
McCandless: Well, that still wouldn't service your outbuildings.
Morrow: Well, it would give them water. Are you asking me would it be
capable of putting out 40,000 gallons? I guess I'm not understanding your
question.
McCandless: I'm just asking if that would solve the problem that you have out
there with no water to control fire or something of that sort.
Morrow: The answer to that question would be no. No well of the six-inch
capacity at 128 feet is capable of creating fire flows that are 2,000 gallons per
minute and those kinds of things. Those take industrial wells, which are
typically, in our case in the City of Meridian, 750 feet deep. They're twelve
inches in diameter and multi-horse power pumps.
McCandless: Okay. That's what I wanted to know.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I just have one more question, Mr. Morrow. Did I understand you
earlier when you first started that all of the material that you're storing in this
building already is on your property and it's already stored outside on your
property?
Morrow: That's correct, with the exception of some furniture that we use in
model homes from time to time for display purposes and that stuff comes in
and out. It's currently stored at Merchant's Moving and Storage and at
another facility on Commercial, 2212 Commercial out here in Meridian.
Nary: Thank you.
Morrow: Any further questions?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 29 of 51
Corrie: Any other questions, Council? Any questions from staff? Okay.
Discussion.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess since I'm the latecomer to the party, I'll at least see what
(inaudible) of what the information that we have but it sounds to me that Mr.
Morrow acquired this building permit and I think this has identified an issue
that we have wrestled with a number of times on other projects as well. He
did secure his building permit to build this building. As he said, this review is
after his permit was issued, after his plans had already been submitted. All of
that was done and then this fire review was done. It, essentially, sounds like
at Councilman Anderson's request to get that done. I think it probably should
have been done but it wasn't and we gave him a permit. We annexed this
property that doesn't have water capacity to meet this need. We have
basically allowed the same type of uses in the area. This material is all there
on his property now. If it were to catch on fire now, which is probably a higher
likelihood since it's outside, we have no water capability to put it out. We
have no water capability for the buildings adjacent for the same reason. I
mean, I agree with what Mr. Mayor said originally. I'm not in favor of always
granting exceptions and variances and things like that but I understand Mr.
Morrow's dilemma. He came and asked for his permit, we reviewed it and
gave it to him and after the fact, we came and reviewed it and said, oh, wait a
minute, don't build it, we don't have fire capacity out there. I think he honestly
told us and I believe him, that he wouldn't have built this building if they had
told him that. Once we gave him a building permit, he has a property right
that he had a right to go forward on. I don't see that he's at fault. I
understand our process just didn't work as ideally as we would have liked
because I do think this information should have been told to him before we
gave him a permit. I don't necessarily agree with former Councilman
Anderson, that we necessarily have some increased liability to the City if we
were to grant this but I don't see how we penalize Mr. Morrow after the fact in
imposing these requirements upon him after we've issued him a building
permit. I think that's really the key here, to me. We gave him a permit, he
went forward and then we said stop because we've realized that part of our
plan review process wasn't done prior to the issuance of a permit. We've
wrestled with that issue on a number of other cases and I think this just
happens to be one of them as well. So, I guess, what I'm understanding is,
what Mr. Morrow is asking, is to amend these Findings of Facts and
Conclusions to eliminate the fire requirements from these findings. Now, I
don't know whether or not process wise he still needs to have a variance or if
he doesn't need anything. I don't know. I don't see any reason to penalize
him when-
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 30 of 51
*** End of Side Two ***
McCandless: Joe, what is the procedure when you get a building permit as to
fire inspection? Why wasn't the fire inspection done before Councilman
Anderson asked for it?
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Councilwoman McCandless. I can't answer that. I was
requested by Councilman Anderson to perform a plan review. This project
was already initiated when I came aboard as the Fire Marshall. Ordinarily,
the process, when we're dealing with a building with absolutely nothing built
and I'll explain that in just one second, we get a set of plans that are sent over
to the Fire Department for a plan review. The plan review goes back to the
Building Department and it is issued and made an attachment to the
approved set of plans that goes out to the project that the project manager
utilizes to guide the project through the process. In this case, I believe what
happened is, that this building was treated as an accessory building, as an
accessory use, and that was apparently how it was not plan reviewed by the
Fire Department and the project got initiated. We got in the situation we are
in today. Occasionally, we've tended improvements. That being interior walls
of an existing building, you know, interior modification of interior walls. Those
projects are so numerous that go through City staff that those are not plan
reviews. We do, occasionally, run into issues where the Fire Department
goes out on a final inspection out there where we don't have an opportunity to
see a set of plans. We're not even aware of the project in progress and we
are expected to go there and do a final inspection and we become aware of
several issues, some significant occasionally, that are existing out there that
we have to act upon and try to straighten out at the tail end of the project. It's
just unfortunately how the process works, given the volume of tentative
improvements and new buildings going in to the City. That's basically,
currently, how the process works.
McCandless: I guess my question is, what happened to Walt, wouldn't
happen today? Would that be a fair assumption?
Silva: When you're going out to build a building that does not exist even in
the form of a shell, we get a set of building plans from the Building
Department that we are expected to conduct a plan review on. Ordinarily,
they are sent over to the Fire Department for plan review. Apparently, this
building was deemed as an accessory building and not a significant project or
a significant change in the amount of fire load present on that building site
and that's why it did not go through the ordinary process of a plan review by
the Fire Department.
McCandless: Well, what would you call it, if it was not an accessory building?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 31 of 51
Silva: Then, it would be as Mr. Morrow has indicated during our discussion,
said it's a storage building within the City, which the expectation there is that
it's going to have municipal services i.e. water supply and sewer. It would be
expected to have those things in place as a part of the approval of the project.
McCandless: Thank you.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess, originally, we overturned the Planning and Zoning
Administrator's stop work order or denial of application for the very reasons
that Councilman Nary suggested. You know, it was an internal issue. He
was granted a building permit without the sign-off of Planning and Zoning and
the Fire Department. Why is-it was an oversight or Don Whitman suggested
it, you know. He didn't think it warranted it. Councilman Anderson thought
different, you know, our staff thinks different but the building is underway. It's
sitting there without-I mean, there's quite an investment there. So, you
sympathize on that. My only question is, will the City have any liability in this?
We can't look back and we can't look at it in terms of well, we've let people do
it before. We've kind of taken a stand and trying to draw a line in the sand
that we won't continue to do things wrong just because we've done them
before. We have codes. We have to uphold them. This one has gone too
far. But, my only question is, are we liable? I thought that's why this has
been continued forever and ever. I'd like an answer. Are we liable? If we're
not, let's move on this or not.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I did some research on this. I
wasn't able to find any Idaho cases that held, or at least appellate level cases,
that held the City liable for approving-there were some references to
approvals where building codes were not followed. I think you also have to
look at a number of issues in relationship to this building beyond the fire code
requirements that Deputy Fire Chief Mr. Silva suggested. One is that Mr.
Morrow has agreed to limit the use of the building. There are some things
that are in these findings and order that would limit the uses. That certainly
minimizes the potential for liability. I can't say that there won't be any
possibility of liability. My crystal ball isn't that good. You can look at the type
of construction. You can look at what the building is going to be used for.
You can look at the type of restrictions that are placed on future uses of the
building. It may not be that long before you have water running down that
road, with issues related to the Ten Mile interchange study, sewer projects,
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 32 of 51
water. This is an area that's zoned industrial and has been for a long time
and people that built north of the railroad tracks know or should have known
that it was industrial use. If they looked at the pasture, it's one of the areas of
town that is potential to develop industrially. I don't know if that exactly
answers your question but, I mean, that's my perspective on it.
De Weerd: Now, when we get sewer and water there, because he is in the
City, he'll be required to hook up. Correct?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. There's a City ordinance that
says that if water and sewer is within a certain footage and if you're in it, then
you do have to connect. Since he's right on Franklin Road, of course, there
would most likely be a fire hydrant within the required footage to this
structure. I believe, and Deputy Chief Silva can correct me if I'm wrong, but I
believe that the fire hydrant would solve the fire flow question and solve this
fire code dilemma because there would be that source of water there.
De Weerd: Is there appropriate language that we can put in these findings
with the agreement of Mr. Morrow of hooking up when it's available and that
he releases any liability to the City of Meridian in case of a fire? You know, I
just want to-I know you haven't found any cases and I really don't think that
Mr. Morrow would hold the City liable but I do think since that issue was
raised, it's not an issue we should ignore.
Nichols: Councilwoman De Weerd, Mayor and members of the Council. It
can be written in to the findings that Mr. Morrow will issue a release of liability.
I mean to tell you, though, that that is not the end of the story because if
somebody else gets hurt or somebody else has some property in there or
some of those issues, that's just not the end of the story. That might bind Mr.
Morrow and it might be a recordable document that might bind someone to
whom he sells this property in some fashion but it's not the kind of thing that I
would-I mean, it would be great if you could get it but I wouldn't necessarily
think that that's the end of the issue on that part of it. As far as writing in a
requirement that he hook up when the water and sewer or just the water
alone, is really the issue. The sewer is not an issue with regard to this
particular question. So, that he connect to City water supply would be
sufficient to resolve the issue as long as there's that hydrant within the
required minimum linear distance. Mr. Mayor, I believe Mrs. Stiles has a
question or something.
Corrie: Mrs. Stiles.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I just wanted to know, as far as
the occupancy, Daunt will be the only one that will be able to sign that
occupancy because the Planning and Zoning Department and the Fire
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 33 of 51
Department will not be able to sign off on that. I don't know if that helps with
the liability issue or not. The occupancy certificate would have to be issued
with only the Building Department's signature.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: It would seem to me on this particular issue that the only language we
may want to include in this order is that pursuant to the City Code, he's going
to have to hook to water when it is available. If there isn't a hydrant within the
required distance, that he may have to provide fire safety requirements at that
point. I agree with Mr. Nichols, on Franklin Road the likelihood of that is
pretty small. I don't think it's necessarily reasonable-I don't know that we
ask anybody else to give us a waiver to approve their permit. I think what we
may want to include in the language is that he recognizes at this time that
there is no water service there. I think we have required that or we have put
that in development agreements before that they recognize that at this
juncture, we have no sewer and water service to the site, that the risk is
theirs. Certainly, if there is a fire and someone sues us, although it is a fairly
remote possibility, we certainly are going to say, I think you need to talk to Mr.
Morrow about that, not us. We'll have to figure that out at that juncture. I
mean, I just don't see that we have-and the reason, I guess, just to be clear,
the only reason I raise the other property that are adjacent, wasn't as good a
reason to grant a variance. It was that the risk to us is no different. If we
have risk at all, we already have it. So, it isn't that that was the reason to do
it. It was simply that-I don't know that there is any increased risk anyway
but that was my only point. Other than-that type of language, which I think
we could direct Mr. Nichols to prepare some other language and take out this
other stuff regarding the fire safety things and putting that in, I think would be
adequate.
De Weerd: I could live with that.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I almost believe that with the agreement that that group of people along
that area when they were annexed, have got an agreement that once water
and sewer is available that they will hook up to it. I'd be real shocked if they
don't.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 34 of 51
Nary: Yes. My thought was-just a reference, if there's a City Code that's
available to reference, we'd certainly include that reference that that's already
existing.
Morrow: My point here would be that I don't have any problem at all with it if
the water is being brought down Franklin Road, at my cost I would install the
necessary fire hydrants that service my 600 and some lineal feet of property
that I own. If the water line is coming by, feel free in the document to obligate
me to put in, I think it's probably, every 450 feet, that would be two fire
hydrants within my property line. I don't have a problem with that. I
recognize that the responsibility is solely mine. I have no problem with that
either. It's no different than it is today.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Mr. Morrow, before you get too
far from the microphone, as I look at Deputy Chief Silva's requirements that
are in the current draft of the findings, the only issues I think that may be
burdensome are Items A and B. A is the public water supply required. We
could probably amend that to indicate that there's no water there now and
when the water is available on Franklin Road, Mr. Morrow has agreed to
install a hydrant within the required depth. Under Item 2, options to reduce
that requirement, that's the one that has the-let's see here. It talks about
walls and structural members and the rural water supply. So, it would be that
next part that talks about the 40,250 gallons stored in an approved manner. I
think that's what I'm hearing the Council might want to take out. The other
things are an address on the building visible from the road, fire extinguishers,
storage not to exceed twelve feet in height, ceiling clearance at least two feet.
Morrow: All of those issues, Mr. Nichols, are fine. They're standard types of
things. The property address, all 17 % acres, is 2340. There are already
street numbers that exceed the five-inch minimum on both the existing house
and mailbox.
Nichols: Okay. Then, Mr. Mayor, also a required item was if it were ever
going to be used for another purpose that then, there would have to be a
Conditional Use Permit and all fire codes would have-
Morrow: No. There wouldn't be a Conditional Use Permit because it's an
industrial zone. I think that what the discussion was by Mr. Whitman was, is
that at any time it changed, then there would be building permits issued for a
change of usage. I think also, if you'll look, that I testified that the building
was designed and the materials and the quality of the materials were
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 35 of 51
designed and built so that at some point in the future it could change to
industrial use, at such time, services became available. Certainly, at that time
and through that process, any tentative improvements or changes in the
building, predicated by a change in usage, would be done through the normal
building permit process. Such as, we do tentative improvements in buildings
that we build within the City now.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Morrow is correct. I wasn't reading it well enough but
it talks about a certificate of zoning compliance, commercial application
reviews to be followed including fire codes, if there's some change in the use.
Bird: Mayor, I think Shari's got a question.
Corrie: Shari.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council. Any other project of this type would require a
Conditional Use Permit. It's more than one building on a lot and this is a non-
conforming use. It has, you know-the only uses there now are-there's
already a house, single family dwelling. There's an office building. This
would be turned into some type of industrial building similar to the one Mr.
Morrow has built over in Lane Industrial Park. So, as far as Planning and
Zoning, we wouldn't be able to issue a certificate of zoning compliance,
should he come in for a building permit to change the use at a future time
without a Conditional Use Permit. I just wanted to make that clear.
Bird: (inaudible) discuss at this point. We can deal with that down the road
(inaudible).
Corrie: Those could be-
Morrow: I guess the issue there is if it's going to be changed at some point in
time to industrial use and it's an industrial zone property and the use is an
approved use within the industrial zone, why would you need a Conditional
Use Permit?
Corrie: Well, honestly, I can't answer that.
Morrow: Well, neither can I.
Bird: We're not worrying about that right now.
Corrie: Well, you're right, Keith. We don't have to. It's just that I think-
Bird: Unless he's changed his permit already.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 36 of 51
Corrie: Yes, well, it's a-I don't know. A round peg in a square hole or
something. Okay.
Silva: Mr. Mayor and Mr. Nichols. Just a point of clarification. Mr. Morrow
was correct when he indicated that the average typical spacing of fire
hydrants is 500 feet. So, his project with 600-foot frontage would, in fact,
probably have two hydrants. You may want to make that one of your facts
and findings, I would suggest.
Bird: That's fine. When it gets there?
Silva: When municipal water supply becomes available. Correct. So, I don't
know if you want to include that in Mr. Nichols facts and findings but we'll find
out.
Corrie: Any other discussion?
De Weerd: What was that?
Corrie: Okay. Who wants to make a motion with all of this in it?
De Weerd: Bill.
Bird: Nary, we'll let you.
Corrie: An attorney telling another attorney how to write it.
De Weerd: He has such good verbiage.
Nary: Mr. Mayor, I guess I move the approval of the order granting appeal
overruling the Planning and Zoning Administrator's denial of application with
the following amendments, that our Council prepare some amended findings.
I guess we probably want to see them before we approve them but that
Section Three, in regards to the fire prevention issue, that the language be
changed to indicate when that service is available that the fire conditions
regarding public water supply will be met, that Mr. Morrow will hook to the City
water supply when it's available pursuant to the appropriate City Code, that
we would eliminate the condition regarding other alternative compliance with
the rural supply and the other information regarding the alternative ones, that
pursuant to City Code, that when available, the fire hydrants will be installed.
There appears to be two fire hydrants be installed on the frontage of his
property at his expense and there also be a statement in the findings that Mr.
Morrow recognizes that at this time that there is no water supply available and
does assume his own risk in using this building for storage as outlined in the
findings. I think it has the limitations already. I guess part of my motion is
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 37 of 51
once we approve the findings, which I guess will be a couple of weeks, that
we direct the Building Department Administrator to sign the certificate of
occupancy and allow this to get occupied and done with.
Bird: Second.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. As I drive by the buildings
several times a week, it's just at the foundation stage. It's not at the
certificate of occupancy stage.
Nary: Oh, okay. I'm sorry.
Bird: --issue the building permit. Re-issue the building permit.
Nary: I guess remove the stop work order and continue with the project. My
mistake. I'm sorry. Thank you. I don't think there was anything else. Would
two weeks be adequate, Mr. Nichols, for findings? August 6th?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Yes. We'll have the draft done
this week. I mean, we'll have it done this week. We just wait on your next
meeting.
Nary: We could probably put this in on our consent agenda on August 6th
unless there's some other question about it.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Yes.
Nary: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. There was a motion and a second made. Any further
discussion? Hearing none. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes. Hearing all
ayes. It will be on the consent agenda in two weeks.
MOTION CARRIED
Corrie: Five minutes break and be back in five or ten minutes.
RECESS
Corrie: The next item on the agenda is the discussion of approval of tentative
Budget. Stacy.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 38 of 51
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget: Approve
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council. I think Will has passed out to you the
totals that you'll need to approve for each fund for the budget. We also have
if you wanted to look again, at the final of what you appoved for each fund.
It's on the screen. That's the general fund. You'll notice the bottom number,
the increase the capital improvement fund number is $66,000. That
increased from where we were before because in the flurry of moving, when
we moved the dues to the P & Z, we didn't increase the general fund and we
should have done that. So, if you want to us to-I don't know how you would
like to do it, if you want us to move the screen up so you can just look at each
fund or each department, if you want to look at the enhancements. So, there
would be other government.
Corrie: I think we're probably pretty good. One thing I did want to-you did
mention about the senior citizen's center, giving them that extra $5,000. We
have to do it differently, don't we?
Kilchenmann: Yes. Maybe Mr. Nichols could address that question because
I believe it's a legal question.
Corrie: --about the senior citizen's, giving an extra $5,000. We can't do
(inaudible)
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. We need to do some research
into that particular issue and I will get you a memo. I'm not prepared to
discuss it at this time but I'll research it and get you something before the
budget hearing itself as to what can or can not be done.
Kilchenmann: We could always decrease the budget. We just can't increase
it.
De Weerd: Yes, we had talked about that afterwards, that the $5,000 could
be dedicated towards the van service. Kind of in our efforts for mass transit
or alternative transportation that, you know, since we helped them with their
van when they purchased it that it could be dedicated to insurance, fuel, and
just cost associated to the van. In your research, the attorney can kind of
look at that. That would be good.
Kilchenmann: So, do you want to review this again or do you want just
approve the-
Bird: I feel very comfortable with it, Mayor. We went over the budget real
well and it's setting here. She's got it broken out like this so we can publish it.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 39 of 51
We can be prepared when we have our public hearing. If we have to, we can
go into it at that point. I, myself, feel comfortable with it. I feel very
comfortable.
De Weerd: I haven't seen any hard paper copy or anything but if you could
give that to us in the meantime just to update our-
Kilchenmann: Yes, we could. It's just hot off of the press. In fact, she can
print it right now and give you copies.
De Weerd: Just by department, you know, not the whole line item stuff.
Kilchenmann: Yes, that summary.
Bird: Yes.
Corrie: Okay. Mr. Bird.
Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we take this proposed fiscal year 2003 tentative
budget as presented tonight for publication before our public hearing on
August 22nd and get it published.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further
discussion?
De Weerd: Is this what we call, Mr. Mayor, blind faith?
Corrie: Well, yes. See no evil, hear no evil, and we speak the truth.
De Weerd: Did Tom stick his groundskeeper in there?
Bird: No, he didn't.
McCandless: This isn't U.S. Congress.
Bird: You can always take stuff out. You can't add to it.
Corrie: All those in favor of the motion say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 40 of 51
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess before I said aye I should have asked but this includes
the conversation we had earlier with the code enforcement and the new
planner?
Corrie: Yes, it does.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. Next is the discussion of proposed exchange of surplus
property. Former Fire Station on Meridian road for other property and cash.
Mr. Nichols.
7. Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus Property -- Former
Fire Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash:
Approve - set Public Hearing date
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Mr. Amos had to leave. You
have before you an exchange agreement, which has been signed by Mr.
Zimmerman on behalf of Farmer's and Merchant's State Bank. Just to review
what this agreement does, the Bank has acquired some parcels of property,
which are adjacent to the former Police facility over here on Idaho Avenue
and they propose to exchange those parcels-you don't have the agreement?
Bird: Yes, we have it but I don't know what I did with it.
Corrie: We had it before.
Nichols: Well, let me just go through it. Mr. Mayor and Members of Council.
I have one on my-maybe it's because it's my office copy. The gist of the
exchange agreement is that the City owns lots one through five in Block Two
of the amended plat of the original town site, which is the former Meridian
Road Fire Station. Well, up until the new facility was built on Franklin Road, it
was the Fire Station. The Bank is the owner of lots one, two, three, four, and
five of Block Two of the amended plat of Rowan Addition to Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho. The Bank's properties are valued at $237,731. The City's
property, the former fire station property, is valued at $260,000. The
proposed exchange calls for the Bank to exchange it's parcels as noted to the
City in exchange for the fire station parcel plus the Bank would also pay the
City an additional $22,269 in cash in order to equalize the value on the
exchange. The agreement is subject to approval by the City Council after
conducting the public hearing required by Idaho Code. It's an agreement,
essentially, to make the exchange if, in fact, after the public hearing you
decide it's in the best interest of the City to do so. Under the terms of the
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 41 of 51
agreement, the Bank bears the expenses of closing, including title, insurance,
and recording fees and that sort of thing. Again, the agreement is contingent
upon affirmative action of the City Council after a public hearing as required
by Idaho Code 50-1402 and 50-1403. So, if you authorize the Mayor to sign
and the Clerk to attest, the next thing that happens is a public hearing is
scheduled, there is a summary of action taken by the Council, which is
published by the Clerk, which references what is supposed to take place,
notifies the public of the date and time and place of the public hearing and
then at the hearing, if the Councilor after the hearing, if the Council decides
to proceed with the exchange, then there will need to be an ordinance
adopted, which authorizes the exchange. An ordinance or a resolution. I've
got to double-check that. It may be just a resolution but there will need to be
a formal action taken by the Council.
Corrie: Okay. So, we need a public hearing, correct? The next thing after
we approve for me to sign and the Clerk to attest, set a public hearing.
Nichols: That's correct, Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Do you publish it-how soon can the public hearing be heard?
Nary: It says 15 days?
Corrie: 14 days but count backwards. You're good at that Will.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I would expect that probably
the soonest would be the third Tuesday in August.
Corrie: So, it would be the 20th of August. Okay.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Get this up for discussion. I would move that we approve the proposed
exchange of surplus property with Farmer's and Merchant's Bank and for the
Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest and set the public hearing.
Nary: I'll second. I was going to ask, though, does the resolution need a
number? Is it a formal resolution?
Bird: It's a resolution, yes.
Nary: So, it needs a number?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 42 of 51
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council and Councilman Nary. There's
not a resolution on this exchange agreement itself. It's just an action at this
point. If I conclude it's a resolution, there will be a formal resolution. If it's an
ordinance, there will be an ordinance and it will be assigned numbers in due
course.
Nary: Thank you. Second.
Corrie: Okay. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: For the public hearing, it would be very helpful if we had
something that showed where these blocks were in relationship, you know,
some visuals.
Nichols: You mean a presentation?
De Weerd: That would be nice, instead of just lot numbers.
Corrie: Just the pictures of the fire station and the lots over there by the
police station.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I was going to say too, in addition to that, I think aren't these
residences, some of them are currently occupied.
Corrie: Yes.
Nary: So, probably, information about when those leases run out and that
kind of stuff. I think you'd also-Council member De Weerd brought up the
question about the senior vehicle, the senior center's vehicle that they
currently store at the fire station and what's going to happen with that. So, all
of those issues probably need to be out on the table to discuss. Did you get
that? I'm sorry.
Stiles: So, you want some digital photos and maybe the art view information
from the base map?
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 43 of 51
Nary: I think just something so the public can see what we're talking about. I
think we want to be able to show the public what we're-what property we're
exchanging for what but I think the other issues that we had previously
discussed, which probably the Bank needs to talk about or someone needs to
talk about, is I think some of those homes are occupied by people. I don't
know how long their leases are. I don't know when they're supposed to be
vacating those properties or even if they're of it. I don't have any idea. We'd
also talked about the senior center vehicle. It's currently housed in the old fire
station and I don't know what particular plan we had in mind as to what to do
with that but I think we at least need to talk about it.
Stiles: Can I get a list of these addresses from Will or the lots and blocks?
Corrie: I think Will has them.
Stiles: Do you have them written down? Okay. All right. Thanks. I'll get that
for you.
8. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
Corrie: All right. The next item is water, sewer and trash delinquencies. This
is to inform you in writing if you choose, that you have the right to a pre-
determined hearing at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July the 23rd of 2002 before the
Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to
defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is
delinquent. You may retain counsel and the service will be discontinued on
July 24th of 2002 or July 315t of 2002 unless payment is received in full. Is
there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash
delinquency? Hearing none. I, hereby, inform you that you may appeal or
have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court,
pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be
shut off and the amount of turn-offs is $23,315.96. Council, you've seen the
list of turn-offs. I'll entertain a motion on the action.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the delinquency turn-off list for the water,
sewer, and trash bills and service to be discontinued on July 24th, 2002 or
July 31,2002 for the sum of $23,315.96.
McCandless: Second.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 44 of 51
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further
discussion? Hearing none. All of those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
9. Ordinance No.
Amendments:
02-380
for
Water
and
Sewer
Corrie: Excuse me. Item number nine is a resolution number 02-380 for
water and sewer rate changes. Mr. Clerk, if you will read the Resolution
number 02-380. I guess we don't need to have you read it. There's not that
much there. By title only, I guess. I don't know where it would be a title. I'm
trying to find the first sentence. I'm sorry. I'll let (inaudible) take care of that.
He knows more about it than I do.
Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Resolution 02-380. A
resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian adopting water and sewer
fees.
Corrie: Okay. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to have the
resolution number 02-380 read in it's entirety?
De Weerd: We do.
Bird: We do.
Corrie: I said audience. I didn't say (inaudible)
Bird: It's so small. We can read that one.
Corrie: It does have three, four, five other pages. Mr. Nary.
Nary: Just so I'm clear, the ordinance that's next on the agenda is related to
this resolution. Correct?
Corrie: Yes.
Nary: Okay. Don't we need to pass the ordinance first?
Bird: Yes, we do.
Nary: We can't adopt the resolution of fees until we actually amend the
ordinance that allows us to do it.
Corrie: Okay.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 45 of 51
Nary: I think we have to do it in reverse.
De Weerd: He was jumping up and down but we ignored him.
Corrie: Item number nine is changed to ten and ten to nine and the ordinance
number 02-967 for water and sewer amendments. So, Mr. Clerk if you'll read
the ordinance number 02-967 by title only at this time.
Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. Ordinance number
02-967 an ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Meridian City Code by
either adding or deleting language to Section 9-1-7 B application for permits,
fees, 9-1-19 A (1) (2) (4) user charge, B (1) (2) charges for water and
installations, C (1) private fire service, 9-1-21 A termination of service, and B,
right to hearing, 9-4-24 A monthly service charges, 9-4-25 A permit required
fees and B, sewer connection charges providing for conflict, providing for
validity, providing a savings clause and providing an effective date.
Corrie: Okay. On further reading of Ordinance number 02-967. Is there
anyone in the audience that would like it read in its entirety? Hearing none.
I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance number 02-967.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I would move the approval of Ordinance number 02-967 for water and
sewer amendments to the Meridian City Code as prepared and pursuant to
Idaho Code 50-902 to waiver any rules as allowed. The only other thing it
asks is, it appears to be fairly lengthy on whether or not we need a summary
be provided at a later time. It's six pages. I just didn't know how much it was
going to cost to print it.
Bird: Second.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. I wanted to get the ordinance
to you and I will get the summary. I didn't have sufficient time to prepare it.
Nary: That's great. Just saves us a little bit of money.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any other discussion?
Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 46 of 51
10. Resolution No.
Changes:
02-380
for Water and Sewer Rate
Corrie: Item number ten, now, is resolution number 02-380 for water and
sewer rate changes. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to have it
read in it's entirety. Okay. I'll entertain a motion on Resolution number 02-
380.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I'd move the approval of Resolution 02-380 for water and sewer rate
changes as prepared for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded. Any further discussion? Roll
call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
10-8. ACHD - Dissolve? Create Letter
Corrie: The next item is an added one, the discussion on ACHD, a letter or
message to Ada County Commissioners on the question of dissolution of
ACHD. We did get an ACHD reason for being tonight and we thank them for
that. I guess the question is, do we want to send a letter to the ACC people
saying that we don't necessarily want a dissolution of the ACHD but we
should look at other means to work out some difficulties that might be there,
whether to do a letter, to do it by phone, or do both because it's coming up I
imagine rather quickly that they're going to have a hearing. Commissioner
Kingsford is going to ask for it anyway.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. De Weerd.
De Weerd: The date has been set for August 28th. I think over the last
couple of years that Shari and I have served, our communication with ACHD
has gotten much improved and I just can't see-I agree with Commissioner
Simmons that unless there's a proposal that comes forward that suggests
something that would work, you know, I don't see, in my personal opinion,
that there's a big issue. Certainly, if the cities were to inherit it or their own
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 47 of 51
roads, it's such a duplication of personnel and administration and there would
be no equipment transfer. We'd be starving from ground zero. I don't know-
*** End of Side Three ***
De Weerd: --I think that if there are things that we have concerns about in
dealing with ACHD, now is the time to pull that information together and ask
them to work on it, come to the table, and try-if people think it's broken, let's
try and fix it before we throw it out. That's my two cents.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I'll put in my penny's worth. I have a lot of disagreements with ACHD
but I'm sure they have a lot of disagreements with the City of Meridian and
some of the things we do. I think that when they were originally set up, they
were set up as kind of an overseer of the deals and when the first bunch of
Commissioners in there, basically, most of the work was done through private
industry contracts. Now, they have built themselves into a humongous
construction company and staff, which is neither here nor there. Meridian,
Idaho, the City of Meridian, could not, for 7% that our taxes pay, could not do
the infrastructure. Absolutely could not and with our impact fees. I'm like
Tammy, I think that we need to work with them. I think our working
relationship has definitely improved since they've come to a five-person
commission. I think they try to listen. I'm sure they've got some complaints
against us. I think that we need to write a letter as public officials. I would
hope that all five of us would agree with supporting them, not supporting the
whole program but I think it can be worked out to the betterment and I think
it's the only way that we're going to have any infrastructure in Ada County. If
you split it up, it's just duplication.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess if Council member De Weerd put in her two cents and Mr. Bird
put in one, I guess it's a farthing that I have. You know, I guess my only
thought is, I would agree with what's been said. I think the relationship with
the City of Meridian and the Ada County Highway District has been very
positive. I have heard almost every day from somebody that they don't like
that bridge getting resurfaced or something happening in town and it's
something we need to fix and, you know, I feel sorry for the Highway District.
You can't do this in one day. You can't do it overnight. There are a lot of
things that people get very frustrated by. They like the results but they don't
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 48 of 51
like the road to get there. I think there are some real positive-but on the
other side, I don't necessarily think it's as horrific or scary either to
contemplate the dissolution of ACHD because it may not necessarily be the
cities doing it themselves. The Highway District, by statute, would have to
continue operating until a plan was in place. The County would probably
have to run the program and that actually gives me more pause than the
Highway District, in doing it. You know, I guess I'm torn only in the fact that I
don't necessarily think it's the worst thing that could ever happen in this
community, was to not have another layer of government to have to work
through to get anything accomplished. I think that's the frustration that our
citizens and we've felt. It's just another governmental layer. They serve a
great purpose. There's a good reason it was instituted. There's a good
reason it should continue. I don't know that all the alternatives are
necessarily better. I think they're just different. You know, if we want to do a
letter, that's fine. I think our presence would probably be better than a letter.
I think our presence would probably be a good idea to participate in that
because I think the Highway District and what the paper carries and the news
sees a lot, is the entities that don't get along with the Highway District and are
always adverse to each other and we generally are. I think, at least, the
County Commissioners need to hear that not all entities have the same
issues with the Highway District and not all entities have as much problem
with the Highway District. So, yes, I don't have a problem with doing a letter.
I think our presence would probably be better and at least, you know, if it
ends up in our lap, at least we're going to end up going in with eyes wide
open. I think we should at least be there to say what our experience has
been.
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless, anything?
McCandless: Well, I certainly agree with what Bill said. I can't see acting on
the dissolution because I agree with Tammy. We'd be in a real mess. We
have to have something in place in order to do that. I have my disagreements
with them but they're what we have and I think the more we support them,
perhaps we'll get even better service. I would go along with that and I agree
that we should be there.
Corrie: Okay. Do you want me to get a letter up and make sure that each of
you get a slot and place to sign and then look at it and have it ready for you-
what is tomorrow, Wednesday? I've got a deposition and litigation for all day
tomorrow on a case we've had pending, mediation is what it is.
Nary: If it's August 28th as a public hearing, we could have it at our next
meeting on the 6th.
De Weerd: Yes.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 49 of 51
Corrie: All right. Well, okay. I can get it to you by Monday.
De Weerd: If you can e-mail it to us, we'd have a chance to look at it and give
comments.
Corrie: Yes. Then, you can look at and see what it looks like.
Nary: And make suggestions if we want to. As long as we maybe at least
take some action by the 6th, that's plenty of time.
De Weerd: We can sign it on the 6th.
Corrie: Okay. Do you want me to call Grant Kingsford and tell him that we
are having a letter coming and we want to be at the meeting on the 28th, to be
there to give Meridian support of our thoughts and that?
Nary: What time on the 28th?
Corrie: What time is that, Tammy? Do you know what the time it is on the
28th?
(inaudible)
De Weerd: 7:00 in the evening?
(inaudible)
Corrie: Okay. So, that would be on Wednesday? Okay. I'll call Grant
tomorrow and get the particulars on that and tell him our face is here and I'll
get the letter worked up and send an e-mail. Keith, I'll need your e-mail
address.
Bird: Yes. You've got it. I think it's just changed, though.
Corrie: You're the only one that it kicked it back to me. I will also call David
Wyncoop and Jay Sweitzer just to let them know too. Do you have anything
that you need to talk to Council about? Okay. All right. I know I've got
something else here. What did I do with that? Here it is. The next is the
Executive Session. I need some advice on some, attorney advice. One thing
before we do go into that, Debbie Salone said that there out at the Meridian
Greens is going to have a night out, a group of ten, on August 6th from 7:00 to
10:00. The regular night out for Meridian was cancelled. But, they're going to
have it so if everybody wants to go out there-well, we have our meeting.
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 50 of 51
De Weerd: We'll miss our meeting.
Corrie: We'd miss our meeting. Okay.
Nary: We've got the Bear Creek opening tomorrow.
Corrie: Bear Creek opening tomorrow at 6:00.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
11. Executive Session per Idaho Code ~67-2345 (1)(b) and (1)(f): No
Decision
Nary: I move we go into Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (b)
and (1) (f).
Corrie: The motion has been made. Is there a second?
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Roll call vote, Mr. Berg. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED
Nary: I move we come out of Executive Session.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and second. All those in favor say aye. Let
the record show that no decisions were made at the Executive Session. I'll
entertain a motion to close the meeting.
De Weerd: I move we adjourn.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. 10:20
P.M.
MOTION CARRIED
Meridian City Council Meeting
July 23, 2002
Page 51 of 51
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:20 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
ROBERT D. CORRIE, MAYOR
ATTESTED:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK
I I
DATE
(
July 19, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23,2002
APPLICANT Parks Department
REQUEST Change Order NO.5 for Meridian Settler's Park
ITEM NO.
3-E
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER: See Attached Memo from Tom Kuntz with Change Order(s)
Contacted: Date: Phone:
fI(f~
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
:,,,: ~J",~?~!>:' <- ~ 1, :",~;:>:~~;';>~??;.~~~^?~?P'"'j::?-,~::,:<:>iN-;:~~;c';:""pV~~'? :~::i,^:;'< :~~ ';:,:~;
~. Mendian l?arks&.Recreation' .' "<., ',",: :;. .' .{'~:.
,~, ' ~ ~ ~~ >: '.
~;::;"f"';< :: ,',: .:..: :~:~;:,;;:,,:~ ': 'l.:j;~{ i:'/:;~ ~~~"~: :,~~~t '(:~<:,:~::~::);i,~ ~~:>k~
Memo
RECEIVED
_'. _ i 3 2j~C2
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Mayor Corrie I City Council
Tom Kuntz ~tL
July 19, 2002
Consent Agenda Items for July 23, 2002 Meeting
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFIr,F
The Parks Staff is requesting three change orders for your approval under the
consent agenda for your July 23, 2002 meeting.
1. Chateau Park Change Order #1- $7226.89
The original plans from our architects called for a water tap near the fire
hydrant in Chateau Park.. After final review the fire department inform us that
the tap would not be permitted. Item 1A on the attached change order covers
the addition of 460 Lf of 4" water pipe and a deduction of 140 Lf of 2" water
line for a net increase of $5290.00, Item 1 B reflects a decrease for the
concrete curbing around the playground area and an increase in the concrete
curb, gutter, and flat work for a net increase of $1936.89. This will be the only
change order since the park is complete,
2. Settler's Park Change Order #4 - $5802.00
When the water line was being installed in Meridian Road, ACHD inspectors
found the native soils in the water line trench to be unsuitable for replacement.
The change order covers the cost of replacing the soils with pit run. We plan
on recouping one half of the total cost through the latecomer's agreement with
Sundance Subdivision since this water line benefits their development.
*' 3. Settler's Park Change Order #5 - $168,059.00
This change order covers the cost of building the second portion of the
parking lot along Meridian Road. The original estimate of $125,000.00 was
provided prior to design specifications. David Mae of the eM Company and
Keith Bird our Council Liaison have reviewed the cost difference between the
Page 1
. Page 2
original estimate and the new proposal and found the costs to be fair and
acceptable. The largest increase is the result of additional pit run material
necessary to be imported for the parking lot base. To date this change order
brings the total construction of Settler's Park to $1,097,996,00. The architect's
estimate for phase 1 was $1,300,000.00 and our total budgeted amount for
the project was $1,500,000.00. With the attached change orders we are still
under budget.
2000 Edition - Electronic Format
AlA Document G701- 2000
Change Order
PROJECT:
(Nameandaddress)Meridian 58 Acre Park
Phase One
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:05
DATE: July 9, 2002
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 01028
CONTRACT DATE: March 28, 2002
CONTRACT FOR: Site Development &
Landscape
TO CONTRACTOR:
(Nameandaddress)American Paving PO Box
395 Meridian, Idaho 83680
THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOllOWS:
(Include, where applicable. an)' undisputed amount attributable to previously' executed Construction Change Directives.)
South parking lot addition per approved set drawings dated 5/14/02.
The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed MaJdmum Price) waS $833,165.00
The net change by previously authorized Change Orders $96,772.00
The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) prior to this Change Order was $929,937.00
The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum-PB€e1 will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by
this Change Order in the amount of $168.059.00
The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum -PriEe1 including this Change Order will be
$1.097.996.00
The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by (.1Q) days,
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is1 0/29/02
NOTE: This Change Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or
Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive for
which the cost or time are in dispute as described ill Subparagraph 7.3.8 of PJA DocumenL .A201.
Not valid until signed by the Architect, Contractor and Owner.
The Land Group, Inc.
American Paving Co.
City of Meridian
(Signature)
OWNER (T)pednanu;,)
.p~I(:) ~
BY 1IiL I..brlo "i'ol.p. ojdIY Ic
7/~O laL 07 I/o 0 2-
DATE' DATE ( {
BY
DATE
@ 2000 The Amencan Institute ot Architects. Reproduction ot the matenal herein or substantial quotation
of its provisions without written permission of the AlA violates the copyright laws of the United States and
will subject the violator to legal prosecution. WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright
laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution. This document was electronically produced with
permission of the AlA and can be reproduced in accordance with your license without violation until the
date of expiration as noted below. User Document: changeorderS.aia -- 7110/2002. AlA License Number
T1l6B6S, which expires on 5/3112003.
OWNER 0
ARCHITECT 0
CONTRACTOR 0
FIELD 0
OTHER D
AVTHENTlCA TlON OF THIS
ELECTRON/CALL Y DRAFTED A/A
DOCUMENT MAY ElE MADE BY USING
A/A DOCUMENT D401.
@ 2000 AIA@
AlA DOCUMENT G701-2000
CHANGE ORDER
The American Institute of
Architects
1735 New York Avenue, NW.
Washington, D.C. 20006-5292
n' '" '. ' ',' " ' " ~, ",,"~",,' ,-". ,. '* -, ' -
'.', ' "'. .' . .. A~~,~,iecln '.,avlng Co. '_ . ". '_'
Telephone: 888-7988
Fax: 888-5020
P.O. Box 395, Meridian, Idaho 83680
Idaho PW #12145-AAA-2-4(43)
Oregon CCB # 137240
July 16.2002
The Land Group
Attn: Dave Koga
128 SEagle Rd
Eagle. Idaho 83616
Re: Meridian 58-Acre Park Phase I
American Paving Co. Job#1248
The followin3 is a. request for thange order for the South Pmki.n3 Lot Addition.
Total revised request fur change order (add)... ......................................................... ....... ............. Sl68.059.00
If you should require any fw:1ber information, please don't hesitate to call our office.
Sincerely,
?i;;tco.
Vice President
TLItk
Authorized Signature Required
Date
1248-RCO-s parking addilian milled H6
,~ ~~r""~"" . " ."" "," ""'"~'^, ,'..:' . . *'. " *: H "" " "
~." " , ". "'"~D1~I?lcan"PaV'I"ng"eo., " , '.' , "," ", ",",
Telephone: 888-7988
Fax: 888-5020
P.O. Box 395, Meridian, Idaho 83680
Idaho p.w. #12145-MA-2-4(43)
Oregon CCB # 137240
Iuly 9. 2002
The Land Group
Attn: Dave Koga
128 SEagle Rd
Eagle. Idaho 83616
Re: Meridian 58-Acre PaIk Phase I
American Paving Co. Job#1248
The following is a revised request for change order as. per our letter dated 1u1y 9.2002. American Pllving
Co. is providing & cost breakdown of the south puking addition. This request is revised as per our previous
letters dated July 9lh. and July 2M. Cost breakdown as. follows:
Earthwork: by American Paving Co (July 9dl.letter). .................................................. $47.9&0.00
Asphalt paving by American Paving Co............ ..... ...... ................. ............................. $25.330.00
Sto.rm drain. 'b)t American. Paving Co. .......~....,..,.........................,...._.............i1..."'..............""..... S27~50IIOO
Dumpster slab & tbundlltion by Trinity CODSUUction..................................................$3.1'O.OO
Landscapin8 by Metcalf Landscape (July ~ letter) ............... ........ ..................... ...... $29.224.00
Concre1:e- by Top Conue"te ..11....' ............ ..... II ,..._ ......... ........ ....,...........,.., .&..,....~ ..,..... .",..,.,~.. '1!Io" S22t14S ,00
Ele.ct:rie.al by RoJDar" Electric ."...11I........................",..... .....011..'......" ."....... .....fII....,............ ..."....,11.,. ..,.......... $800.00
FeneiD.g by Sloan Fen.'te...,.... ............jj,......... ......... ............,.......11......., .............. ..... ..,....."."11;.... .... ."'..11- $3,835.00
smkiu.,g by .A.rrow Engin~g .............."................"........,................".......,..",..........."................ S3,tlSO.OO
S'trip.in.g. by M Stl'iping..oII' ...".... ..........,... .&.... ,...,....."..... ....."'. ."...... ",..... ........ ,. .......,..................* 51..4S01l00
Bondin:g &- 'In.s1Jran.ce:. ......11.... ........ '11.'....."..,.,..11,...... ....1'..... ....,.,.... ...1....'................... ....... ,..... ..". $3.74:5.00-
Total cost for South parking lot addition .................................................................. $,168.059.00
Total revised request fur change Older (add) .......n ....... ..................... .......00.............. ....... ............. Sl68.059.00
If you should require any further infurmation. please don "t hesitate to call our office.
Sincerely.
American Paving Co.
*~~.
-:)
Bob Pulley
Estimator
TLJtk
Authorized Signature Required
Date
l248-RCO-s pazking additiaa m--ised 1-11
_......__\J-.,.J'J..'t.J
p..:::
I~
SMllt!I
SETfLERS 68 ACRE PARK S PRANG r::::;p
USTICK RO & MERDAN RD
I.ANl GROUP
LAN) GROUP
BID PUHS DATED 5/1.w2
REVISED PROPOSAL 7/11102
~ a..-w Urit Price ToIaI ~
1 RerrIcIw Trees EA $ -
1 Demo con::mt& c:r $ -
1 Haul to ~!.reds c:r S . ~1
IB8i a! 1.555 $3.00 I $ 4.665.00 $ 4,665.00
"'fj ....., .....m.w. 'B1!~r{{m;1'~"~'~~{,'55$f$._~"':<<<<<<<<w.((' ~{'~~~llirmr{~} .5~t~W1))$~~~~~
'. ... . ...... ..... '1.. . M t m l ~<<, ,/, . >:.: ..W~~~.....,~ ~J.~
2 Site amdloo SF $ -
2. Ell!:: site m C:t $ -
2 Eire Pefklno lot-Ute eN $ .
2; El<<: PitikliVi lat..'iaaW Of $ .
2 All Qnl:nIIB Areas PR C'( $ .
2 FIll Qn::rete Arees ~ Met C'( S .
2 Elc Olnklur Areas CY $ .
2. SfOd(plI8I01' TOb SOlI CY $ . PIInclo 2-
2 Ext:. StreIt!l C'( $ . $ .
~.. ... .. . . ....'~{'f%mr{fi.i,i.i.i.<~/51.....~~mr_... .:.::.:....~f,{{,o/), ~~... r". ,~ . ~.. /~~~~~~~~':......
.., .m .., .... ~ . .... Itlm ii ... .. .. )~%>ili%ili>>
:3 FIll on.aIte M8I: .r::f .$ .
9 RII an.d8 PR Blda Ped r:::t $; -
S FIR PaikIna lot on.eII8 Mat eN 570 $4.00 $ 2.280.00
3 Fft! Pand!tal..ct PR c:t 1.84D 14.00 $ 7.360.00
3 Fill Qlntoor ArBi!S c:y 1430 $3.62 S 5,177.00
3 FlU PIantem WI Tap 5cIi .r::f 150 $3.62 $ 543.DD
'3 FIll LANDSCAPE SEECED AREAS CY 430 53.62 $ 1,5:51.00
9 FIll streets wi ClIHIlIe Mat C{ $ .
a PR fr' PAI1dnn I.Ct-Ul:o 14 29D SF eN B20 $7.Q0 $ 6.440.00 I'tl8lIA 3
S ~OO.: ~ ..,~.i~&j*g;.~m.-1~ $ 28.012.00
-
.. ElcaMI!& 8. BaddIII FoundatIOnS LF 66 :1Q1lC S 650.00
4 Ellterklr~ LF $ .
.. EllterIOf PIer PadS EA. $ .
4 Inlala'Rlallnas LF I $ .
.. Irri:efIot PIer Pads EA S -
.. $ .
4 $ .
.. $ - FMM4
4 - S 660.00
~ 5 L ) ~ : I
,
II 314 RM 4 ~ Blcla Pad 26Q SF c:t 10 $56.00 $. 650,QQ
o Sand · BIda Pad SF C'l' $ -
15 Ext: CtII'lch!lte Areas r::t i . FimM6
a e.e far CDncrat8 6850 SF C'l' 320 $15.00 $ 4,8DO.oD $ 5.350.00
." . \4 .... . c,,\:," ..... . ... ';\.. "'+.+I.t'"
7 314 RM · Sirellt& SF C( t -
7 314 RM 4. PIIlldna Lct-Ul& 24 920 SF C'( 396 S16.00 S Ci.s25.CO FIilBii r
7 314 RM 4 · l:l.wIft.... I 14JXlOSF f:f 226- Si6JJO .s 3..376.C:) !t e~
-----'-" ~ I"""T\.JI
1"'"
stam Drain S - II
6~' - B#de :2 ~ Ci 3SO $3.00 $ 1.170.00
62"~ r:J'( 80 $15.00 $ 1.2OD.oo
6 C-33 SsncI at 30 $16.00 $ 4150.00
6 Rli Ilit t;;'( 140 $5.00 $ 700.00
6 Febl'IC !!i1 4SD 51.25 $ S7!I.oo
6GeoGrId Eft 3SO $1.25 $ 475.00
6 1nfillraiDf:> Ell. 840 $20.00 S 16.800.00
s End Plates EA $ .
6 P8l'f P109 LF 37 $10.00 $ 370.00
6 Petf Plos LF $ .
6 Perf PlD8 LF $ -
fi &.:l!!Q P1D!'! LF 27 $10.00 $ 270.00
sSolldPloo Lf $ .
6 Salld PID8 LF $ ~
sTaas EA $ -
Ii Ceen out CA $ -
Ii ElbCM's EA $ -
Ii .'{'sa eA 1 $75.00 $ 75.00
filCBsls EA 1 $'15.!!0 S 76.00
6 1,(DI Gal S&G Tl1lil5 EA 1 $1,5QO.oo $ i .soo.oo
6 'i SOil G6i s;G TIil;lS EA $ -
6 [E.1 Boms EA ! -
Ii MlIDIlaIas EA $: .
Ii CBh:h Baslf'I!l EXCAVATE&BI\Q(FILL EA 1 $200.00 $ 200.00 Pllltl66
6 Gra:I& Rinas EA 2 $!O.oo $ 100.00 $ 2'7.247.00
MONlTOR.ING WEl..LS EA 1 $500.00 $ 600.00
~OOUARS eA 1 S2!0DD $ 2!O.DO
Tll'! INTO sa:PACE BED EA 1 $1,670.00 $ 1,670.00
$ -
DRAlNAl3E mENCH FILL EXC C( oM 53.00 S 132.00
DRAINAGE TRENCH Fl!..1. C3S SAND C'{ 49 $15.00 $ 735..00
- Q' .....-L- -~.-
"".....0<>..:> <>"t "t"tO
p.'l
sAC · Sbuets SF TN $ -
B AC 2 1f2 . Pefkloo Lat-UlB 24 92C SF TN 390 533.00 S 12-870.00 Phalili. s
II AC 2 112. ParKlna 1.ot-HBaYv 14.cmsF TN 220 .QD S 1.280.00 i 20 130.00
~J~~ I ~ .. .. .. .. 1.'i J.....:~.. :111 'I :. /. ..1...1111 ...~E4'II4' '" n , ..
9 AC SPE8J BUMPS 3" X 16" X B' EA 6 $4O&.DG $ 3,240.00 $ 3.2~.oo
'l>>m... .. ... .. , .....,:III:..m 111I1 . ..I.~. ~. .,11>111.1 .1I11.~ ..IIII.JI .' . . . .. .. .. ..
10 SemI CDIJt SF S 0 S .
. ....~.........'I...... "" \\\ " ". '!\ou'! ... ..... , w. ,
1i SIlDloo BY M STRIPiNG La 1 $1,A50.oo $ 1Al5O.ao
11 Prints EA S -
11 Ell $ -
11 Red QKb LF $ -
11 SImI9 EA $ -
11 AJrrNis EA S 0
11 Whsal stals EA- 1$ 0
11 PrInts EA S . Phn811
11 No ~ PrInts €A $ - $: 1.450.00
*. ~ ~ ........ h u." ., ... ~'.. ..............~~_. .. w . ~ .. .....u. " .. .t....u ... tlI
.. . .... S
12 ,. iiI:k I L8 1 13.160.00 $ 3.160.00 3.1150.00
....
13 _Ofdem $ - $ -
" , <, , ""
14 COncrat8 Qjfer Manhales EA S- o
14 Wal8r\laIvss EA S -
14 aeen OU!S fA S 0 "'-14
14 Cona'et6 BY TOP CDNCREfE I.S 1 $22,1 a..oo s 22.1415.00 $ 25,295.00
14 O:lnl:rulu foundation BY TRINITY LF as S30.oo $ 1.lRlOO
14 CtB'IcnU Slab BY TRINITY SF 260 $4.!O $ 1.170.00
t..I.1 ."00 .. ........... I "J' J '~Jl . : ' .. ~1f1
15 MErCAlF LS 1 4.ools 29 S 29,224.00
'/........~. ... "". ..ll,.. .Ntlo.... 'I ".t... .' .. .' , . " " .1'" h . ....... ..
is EI8::trI:S! ROMAR E!.EC. LS 1 $798.00 $ 798.00 $ 798.00
.u......., ..... ...,.. ........ . ... . ppp ~.'. '/1 U W ........ ........................ .. .. l.ti.. ~ t. ...... ~~<<<<<< _'1
11 ;; ::~~_... LS S 0 * 0
.... .. ,.,,'''' , ,.I.i ~ 'JJ .'1...'..: ...'111 ". .~ .. :
18 S8WC:I.It QIl'b & Gutter LF $ -
18 SaY.cut SidBwaIk LF S 0 PImM 18
18 sawott AC LF S 0 $ -
.. , J .. uu ..u, J, t. J : I , . .. .. I' Y, YN
19 Fancloo SLOAN FBCING LS , _.00 S _ S 3~
.....,..,... n..... 'J NIl. .. .~ ... . ~ .. .... .. , 4 "'l . ~P-u ... V"f"~p-/..p-.' P- . ..... '''. .
. ~ II ... ... .. . . ~
20 T8!ItInl:l LS $ - ;- -
JI.i ........,1.... .~.~.. J'/~..~ ...... .. ..,,~ ".1... . ......~ .t ~ll ~ .. p- .. ,
:at sterilmt SF $ 0 s .
^' m>> <
2SI PrIme am SF $ 0
23 T ril!iic ConIrol S- o
23 Bonds La 1 $3.745.00 S 3.745.00 Pl8e23
ZI Mise: Warrantv. etc.. La 'i $1.&i55.OG $ 'I ;985.00 $ 5.710.00
- $1 Gr8nd T atel
1<.0 Ij W'\)co \D
~ \loQ:,) Dco9. 00 ~
July 1 9, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Mayor ITEM NO.
REQUEST Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position
4-A-l
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATIORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETILERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
ovrf~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
;,;..
~~~;d/:ill l.- ..\
~f
CITY of MERIDIAN - Department Summary
Priority
Enhancement
Name
Depart On.Golng 1 X Ops # or FTE #or
Code Personnel Operating Expenses Capital employees veh[clcs TOTAL
1910 342,055 212,075 6 2
1920 41,480 2,800 1 0
1940 72,290 699,925 2.5 0
455,825 914,800 9.5 2 $ 1,370,625
P&Z 15,000
P&Z
Code Enforcement
Building Department
Base Total
1991 Che Ca rice
Fiscal Enhancements New + 1 lime + aUeGET
Year Budget Base Personnel Operating Budget Base Expenses Capital REQUEST
Proposed Budget FY2003 $ 1 ,370,625 92,717 2,560 1 ,465,902 900 32,000 1,498,802
Current Budget FY2002 $ 1 ,366,520 1 ,366,520 1,366,520
% of Increase 0% 7% 10%
(
July 19,2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Finance Department -- stacy Kilchenmann
REQUEST Finance Report
ITEM NO.
4~B~ 1
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
July 19,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Finance Department -- Stacy Kilchenmann
REQUEST Grant Research Results
Department Reports
ITEM NO.
4-Bm2
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetIngs shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN It
? ,~.. .'.
, . ?" ~"' "
To: MAYOR CORRIE
COUNCILWOMAN De WEERD
COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLES
COUNCILMAN BIRD
COUNCILMAN NARY
From: STACY K1LCHENMANN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Date: 7/19/02
Re: GRANT ACQUISTION
J-;;-:\J) ~ C 11; I TV '~; 1I~~
- ~ . oW.It.J
I 1 9 r.-")
-- ~ _ L.,...,,,,",,,-+
CITY OF MER/ulAN
CITY f:I,ERK ('r-'0f
The purpose of this memo is to share with you the results of my research concerning
grant revenue as a revenue source. This was preliminary research using two
methods: survey, Internet research.
SURVEY
I used the Association of Idaho cities e-mail survey service to ask other Idaho cities if
they have recently acquired a grant, how they did it, did they use an outside grant
writer, and the results. I received minimal response.
City of Eagle: "The City of Eagle received a grant about 4 years ago and believe it or
not we are still in the process of jumping through hoops. Though the end is
near... thank goodness. It was for the Payette River Scenic Byway and we've been
working through ITD to obtain Federal Funds. As you imagine... it's been a bit of a
headache,.. maybe a migraine would be more accurate. We just had a staff member
write up the application."
City of Cottonwood: " The City of Cottonwood is currently working on a water project,
involving a bond, Dept of Commerce Grant and Rural Development Grant. We
started with Request for Proposal for the Water Study, and then proceeded with a
RFP for an Engineer, and than contracted through ClealWater Economic
Development for the administration. We work closely with Jeff Beedman, Rural
Development and CEDA in the applying for the grants, and administering the funds.
So far everything has gone smooth. The Dept of Commerce is about % disbursed
and the bond (interim loan) about % disbursed. Our project is scheduled to be
completed this fall. If you have other questions, please call, I can be reached at 208
962-3231,"
City of Sandpoint:: "The city of Sandpoint is constantly applying for, receiving, and
administering grants. We have a full time grant writer. Call Stephen Drinkard at 208-
255-1443,"
I called Stephen Drinkard. The City of Sandpoint has received grants from the Idaho
Department of Commerce for utility infrastructure, downtown revitalization (with slum
and blight destination) and economic administration (roadwork). Stephan functions
as the City forester and grant writer. He told me that both the Fire and Police Chiefs
actively seek grants for their respective departments. For example grants fund the
school resource officers.
Stephen felt that the real work in grants involves getting the people infrastructure in
place, getting the community support and partnering necessary to implement the
grant. For example he said of the 300 hours logged for the infrastructure block grant
it only took 20 hours to actually write the grant.
INTERNET RESEARCH
Compensation - Grant writers: Grant writers do not work on commission. No federal
grant has a provision to reimburse the cost of grant application. Grant writers work
on a fee basis. A typical fee would probably be around $3,000. There are a couple
services that provide a list of potential grants for a set fee or per hour research
charge.
The first place to look for potential grants is the Catalog of Federal Assistance,
CDFA. The website is easy to use. I scanned public safety. I looked at the details
for only a couple of grants. One was for police through the Office of Community
Policing Services (part of the COPS grant we have gotten in the past); the other was
for fire through the United States Fire Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
ED Page 2
The website clearly details the objective of the grant, who is eligible, how much
money is available and how to apply. I imagine information on state grants is also
available somewhere on the state web site.
SUMMARY
I think each department could spend some time using the Internet to research
potential grants. The first draft of any grant application can be written by the
department and proofread by someone else. I would be happy to proofread and help
with final drafts. The state of Idaho uses extensive grant funding and grants are
obtained "in-house" by department and bureau managers.
The most important and time-consuming part of the administrative process is the
reporting. All grants require two types of reports: financial reports and measurement
reports. Accounting can absorb the financial reporting. In fact it would be essential
that the responsibility be with accounting. All grant costs can be transferred to the
general fund if a grant recipient fails to submit timely, accurate reports. It is also
important that costs be allowable and that grant match be reported and adequately
documented. Federal grant recipients are subject to audits by the Inspector
General. If grant funds are more than $300,000 the City is subject to the Single
Audit Act.
Regular reports on grant results are also crucial. The person who administers funds,
the grant manager, must document and detail how the funds are used and the
results. Like the financial reports there reports must be submitted in a timely
manner.
Many grants are available to City's whose population is considered to be
economically disadvantaged which excludes Meridian. Grants require extra work
but can be very beneficial. Perhaps at some Parks and Public Safety, and General
Government can do some research and we can submit our findings as a written
report.
. Page 3
July 19,2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Public Works Department -- Brad Watson
ITEM NO.
4-C - 1
REQUEST Wastewater Facitliy Plan Update and WWTP Build-out Predesign, Agreement
for Professional Services
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See Attached Memo
uu
Ctl(r
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
ECEIVEf.)
.Jt~,,-
TO': Mayor Corrie /6
From: Brad Watson, P.E. ~ ZJ
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk
Date: 7/18/2002
IRe: Proposed Agenda Item for July 23 City Council Meeting
1 Q
I U
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY (;1 FRK nl=i='lcr
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
July 23 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) Wastewater Facility Plan Update and WWTP Build-out Pre-desion. Aoreement
For Professional Services. The Public Works Department is proposing to have
Carollo Engineers complete a Wastewater Facility Plan update study and treatment
plant build-out pre-design. This project is included in the FY '02 Wastewater
Department budget and is included as strategic initiative in both the Public Works and
Wastewater strategic plans. A copy of that strategic initiative is attached for your
reference.
We issued a request for proposals late last year and interviewed three consultants
early this year (Carollo Engineers, JUB Engineers and Keller Associates). After much
deliberation, the interview team (Gary Smith, Len Grady, John Shawcroft and me)
chose Carollo Engineers as the firm to recommend to City Council for this project.
Carollo Engineers completed the Biosolids Management Study and the Biosolids
Dewatering Project for us and did an excellent job. They will be present at the
Council meeting to give a very brief presentation and overview of the project and be
available to answer your questions.
The FY '02 project budget contains $200,000 to complete this
project while the total proposal is for $235,000. We presented
Wastewater enhancement #2 to you earlier this week for
another $50,000 to cover this agreement. A copy of the
proposed agreement is also attached for your review,
From the desk of. . .
Brad Watsoo, P.E.
City Engineer
Mcridilll1 Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
watsonb@meridiancity.org
Gl Page 1
Recommended Council Action: approve the agreement with Carollo Engineers
for the Facility Plan Update and Treatment Plant Build-out Pre-design on a time
and material basis, not to exceed, amount of $235,000 and authorize the Mayor
to sign and City Clerk to attest.
Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this item.
;f~
. Page 2
TASK ORDER NO.1
RECEIV'ED
CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER)
tW:RIDlAN CITY ENGINEER
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by the ENGINEER pursuant
to the mutual promises, covenants and conditions in the Agreement between the above
named parties dated the , in connection with:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Project (Project).
PURPOSE
The ENGINEER's scope of services, time of completion and compensation shall be as
set forth herein. Services shall generally be described as engineering services for
completion of a Facilities Planning Document for the OWNER's wastewater treatment
plant
ENGINEER'S SERVICES
Services shall be generally described as those necessary for completion of a Facilities
Planning Document. The document will be intended to meet the requirements of Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for wastewater facilities state revolving loan
accounts. Aside from DEQ's requirements, the completed document will also serve as
a preliminary design report, including preliminary design drawings of modules of
construction of treatment plant processes. ready to proceed to final design. At this time,
it is assumed that the existing plant wjll accommodate peak monthly average flows of
5.5 mgd, and the existing site will accommodate new structures and processes to
increase peak monthly average flow capacity to 9.0 mgd.
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ENGINEER will provide the following project management services for the duration of
the project:
1.1 - Work Plan. Establish a project work plan including budget and schedule based
upon this Task Order NO.1.
1.2 ~ Management. Manage the efforts of the project team members and
subconsultants, assign manpower, delegate responsibilities. review work progress. and
communicate with the City.
1.3 - Project Meetings. Attend project meetings with the City. Prepare agenda and
meeting materials. Prepare and distribute meeting minutes. Our proposed schedule
includes the following meetings:
-1-
One project kickoff meeting with City staff and DEO.
Six meetings to discuss alternatives during preparation of the predesign memos.
I i Two meetings during preparation of the facility plan report.
i lOne City Council Presentation.
; i One Public Hearing.
1.4 - Facility Tours. Arrange and attend up to two days of facility tours at wastewater
treatment plants with City staff to investigate new or alternative treatment technologies.
Prepare descriptions and document comments from tours.
TASK 2 - DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM
The purpose of this task is to collect information, project future flows and loadings for
treatment and biosolids disposal needs, and to provide a technical memorandum
summarizing the criteria. which will be the basis for completion of Tasks 3 and 4, below.
2.1 - Data Collection. Review existing operating data for pertinent flow and pollutant
loading data which will affect design of the wastewater treatment facilities. Review
previous reports and facilities plans as well as published population projection data.
Review existing drawings to determine existing site information.
2.2 - Flow and Loading Projections. Use data collected in previous Task 2.1 to
evaluate the current and project the future flow and pollutant loading capacity
requirements of the wastewater treatment plant. Project future requirements over a 20-
year planning period, and correlate with the City-provided growth projections to estimate
timing of required improvements up to the ultimate capacity of 9.0 mgd peak month
average flow on the existing plant site.
2.3 - Discharge Regulations Review and Summary. Evaluate existing NPDES permit
and potential new regulations, based on current information from the Idaho DEO TMDL
allocations for Five Mile Creek, the Lower Boise River, and the Snake River/Hells
Canyon. Include potential revisions in nutrient discharge regulations and potential
changes in biosolids disposal regulations. Summarize the regulatory impacts to process
alternative evaluations.
2.4 - Solids Balance and Biosolids Projections. Complete a computer spreadsheet
model of the solids balance for the treatment plant, including influent solids, solids
produced in the activated sludge process, solids removed in the liquid processes, solids
thickening, stabilization and dewatering. Use the solids balance model to project future
solids production, handling, stabilization and disposal requirements.
2.5 - Plant Hydraulic Profile. Using a sub-consultant, survey pertinent hydraulic
structures and water surfaces to establish the existing hydraulic grade line through the
existing processes, and tie the information to the treatment plant site plan. as recently
provided by the City. Draw a base hydraulic profile to be used when considering
addition of new hydraulic structures. Construct profile for peak-hour and average flow
scenarios for current capacity.
-2-
2.6 - Write Technical Memorandum. Based on the above sub-tasks, prepare a
technical memorandum which sets the basic design criteria to be used in development
and evaluation of alternatives for increasing the treatment plant capacity. The
memorandum will include relevant information from each of the above sub-tasks.
Discuss contents of memorandum with City staff (in meeting described above in Task
1.3), and incorporate City input in the memorandum.
TASK 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEMORANDA
Based on the information generated in Task 2, above, prepare a series of preliminary
design memoranda for the treatment plant's process areas. Each memorandum will
state the design criteria affecting process sizing, evaluate the useful life and capacity
of existing tankage and equipment, develop and evaluate alternatives for meeting the
future design conditions and recommend alternatives for final design and construction.
Redundancy in each process area will also be evaluated, as will the "Do Nothing"
alternative, as required under DEQ's procedures for facility plan development.
Preliminary capital and O&M cost estimates for alternatives will be developed and
compared. Memoranda will be completed for the following process areas:
3.1 - Headworks Area. This memoranda will include evaluation and recommendations
for the influent channel and screening area, the influent lift station and the grit removal
process. Alternatives to be considered include screen and compactor sizes and types,
new influent pumping equipment, and alternative grit removal, pumping and washing
equipment.
3.2 - Primary Treatment. This process area will include evaluation of the plant's
primary clarifiers and primary sludge pumping systems. Alternatives to be considered
include new sizes and locations of primary clarifiers to meet future plant loads. and new
sludge pumps to improve solids removal capacity and redundancy.
3.3 - Secondary Treatment. This memorandum will evaluate alternatives to upgrade
the plant's biological treatment system to meet increased future loading requirements
and to meet potential future discharge regulations, Alternatives for advanced biological
nutrient removal will include similar expansion of the existing aeration baSIns, adding
new tanks or processes in series or parallel with the existing tanks, and evaluation of
secondary clarification needs versus potential membrane treatment processes. Based
on our initial review of treatment capacity and needs, it is anticipated that the following
three alternatives will be developed and reviewed:
A. Expansion of existing selector basin/aeration basinlsecondary clarifier process.
B. Addition of parallel oxidation ditch and clarifier. plus upgrades to existing tanks.
C. Addition of parallel membrane bioreactor tanks, plus upgrades to existing tanks.
3.4 - Tertiary Treatment. The existing filtration and disinfection systems will be
evaluated and alternatives will be developed for adding similar equipment, adding
alternative types of filters or UV disinfection systems, and for adding coagulation or
enhanced filtration systems for removal of phosphorus to very low levels. The capacity
of the plant's effluent disposal system will also be evaluated, incfuding the effluent lift
station and outfall diffusers. However, permitting and preliminary design of outfall
-3-
diffusers and equipment is specifically excluded from this task.
The disinfection system will be evaluated for capacity and reliability issues. Alternative
disinfection processes will not be evaluated. It is assumed that the tertiary filtration
process analysis will include evaluation of the following processes:
A. Expansion of existing granular media filters.
B, Addition of a ballasted floculation process.
C. Addition of a membrane filtration process,
3.5 - Biosolids Stabilization. Using the information from Tasks 3.1 through 3.4, update
the plant's solids balance with the recommended alternatives, to project future solids
production. Evaluate alternatives for improvements to the existing solids thickening and
digestion processes, including alternatives for DAFT expansion and expansion of the
existing temperature-phased digestion system.
3.6 - Biosolids Dewatering and Reuse. Update the information included in the 1997
Biosolids Master Plan and recommend alternatives for increasing dewatering capacity
by adding a centrifuge and upgrading the dewatering building. Update evaluation of
alternatives for biosolids reuse or disposal, including expanding the City's biosolids land
application program versus other disposal methods, as previously described in 1997
Biosolids Master Plan.
3.7 - Plant Utility Systems. Evaluate plant utility systems, including electrical,
instrumentation, natural gas, potable and plant water supply. Recommend
improvements to these systems, as required to support the recommended alternatives
for process improvements. It is anticipated that the deliverables for this memorandum
will include an update to the non-potable water system site plan, an overall electrical
single-line diagram for the plant, and a block diagram for the plant SCADA system - all
of these deliverabJes will show both the existing system and the recommended
upgrades.
TASK 4 - FACILITY PLAN REPORT PREPARATION
This task includes completion of a report summarizing the above information and
supplementing with other required documents, for submittal to and approval by DEQ .
4.1 - Summary of Recommended Alternatives. The recommended alternatives for
each of the above preliminary design memoranda will be brought together and
summarized as the recommended project for design and construction. A report will be
completed that describes the recommended project and references the preliminary
design memoranda for further explanation of the alternatives evaluated. The report will
include the overall description and will have an appendix including the preliminary
design memoranda, the environmental documentation and the other supporting
documents required by DEQ for a complete Facility Plan Report. The report will include
a schedule for timing of the required improvements, based on the plant's peak month
average flow value, and also based on anticipated regulatory requirements. The report
will include an estimate of project phasing costs and of total project cost.
-4-
4.2 - Environmental Assessment. An environmental assessment (e.g., Environmental
Information Document) of the recommended facilities plan will be prepared in
accordance with DEQ requirements. The following will be completed under this task:
4.2.1 - Data Collection
Collect and compile pertinent data. Information will be collected on site conditions,
wetlands, flood plain, vegetation, wildlife, soils, population, economics, cultural
resources, and additional data needed to fully describe the project and its impacts.
4.2.2 - Prepare Draft Environmental Document
Prepare a draft environmental document that identifies purpose and need for project,
describes baseline conditions, project action(s), alternatives to the proposed action,
environmental impacts, and mitigation measures. Submit draft report to City and DEO
for review and comment.
4.2.3 - Aqency ConsultationlCoordination
Consult federal, state, and local agencies as needed to obtain data necessary for report
and to obtain necessary review comments.
4.2.4 - Public Notification and Hearinq
Prepare a notification advertising the availability of the environmental report for review.
Submit the notification to the city for advertisement in a local paper. The public
comment period will extend for 30 days after publication. ENGINEER will attend and
participate in a public hearing held to discuss the project. impacts, and any proposed
mitigation measures.
4.2.5- Final Environmental Document
Prepare a final environmental document that incorporates agency, public, and city
comments as applicable. The final document will be a stand alone document that can
be inserted into the facilities plan report as an appendix.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were made in developing the services for preparing an
environmental assessment:
Agency consultation will be limited to two rounds of contact: one for data collection and
one to solicit comments on the draft document.
The environmental report will be adopted as the environmental assessment by DEO.
The project will be issued a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
A biological assessment and wetlands delineation will not be required.
The City will provide all DEQ-required analysis for the collection system portion.
The City will prepare the financial portion of the report, including funding mechanisms
and any required rate projection and analysis. ENGINEER will review these documents
-5-
and include them in the final report.
4.3 - Other DEQ Requirements/Checklists/Meetings. This task includes an allowance
for other items that may be required by DEQ as a result of DEQ's initial review of the
facilities plan. These requirements may include items such as assembling collection
system and financial information as supplied by the City, or unanticipated tasks such as
a more in-depth discussion of potential re-use sites or feasibility of combining facilities
with recreational uses. This task also provides an allowance for responding to written
questions or comments from DEQ or from issues that result from the public meeting
process, and preparing a final, approved Facility Plan Report approved by DEQ.
PROJECT DELlVERABLES
The following deliverables will be prepared as part of the project:
A. Design Criteria Memorandum (5 copies).
B. Seven Preliminary Design Memoranda (5 copies).
C, Draft Facility Plan Report (5 copies to the city, 2 copies to the state DEQ).
D. Final Facility Plan Report (5 copies to the city, 2 copies to the state OEQ).
E. Project Meeting Minutes. (5 copies).
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
OWNER will provide the following services to support ENGINEER in completion of the
above tasks:
0.1 - Operating Data. Assemble previous three-years of treatment plant and biosolids
program operating data for use by ENGINEER to summarize and use in process
evaluations.
0.2 - Reports and Drawings. Provide copies of previous treatment plant and collection
system master plans. facility as-built drawings, utility information and survey data for
use in component evaluations.
0.3 - Collection System Analysis. Provide description of existing collection system
and any required analysis of collection system and service area, as required by DEQ
for submission of Facility Plan Report. (ENGINEER will include this information in draft
and final report).
0.4 - Growth/Population Information. Provide information on population projections.
identify the future areas of impact, and identify future residential, commercial and
industrial growth as relates to increased wastewater flow and loading.
-6-
0.5 - Financial Analysis. Provide financial information as required for DEO submittal
of facility plan, including financing options and plan for costs estimated by ENGINEER,
and DEQ-required rate impact analysis.
0.6 - Review and Comment. Provide timely review of ENGINEER's deliverables, to
incorporate City comments and information into draft and final reports.
TIME OF COMPLETION
Estimated Notice to Proceed:
August 15, 2002
Estimated Completion of the Design Criteria Memorandum:
September 30, 2002
Estimated Completion of the Draft Facility Plan Report:
December 31 , 2002
Estimated Completion of the Final Facility Plan Report:
March 15, 2002
The ENGINEER will perform its services in a manner that will permit the OWNER to
meet this schedule unless delayed due to a cause beyond the ENGINEER's control.
COMPENSATION
OWNER shall pay ENGINEER on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached
engineering cost estimate and fee schedule (Exhibit C). Subconsultants shall be
invoiced at ENGINEER's cost plus ten (10) percent. All other direct costs shall be
invoiced at the actual cost. ENGINEER's total compensation for the Scope of Services
identified in this Task order shall not exceed the amount of two-hundred thirty five
thousand dollars ($235,000), without additional authorization from OWNER. The
ENGINEER shall submit monthly statements to the OWNER based on the ENGINEER's
labor and expenses accrued at the time of billing. OWNER shaH make monthly
payments in response to ENGINEER's statement.
-7-
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Task Order No.~ is effective as of the
2002.
day of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the ENGINEER and of
the OWNER have executed this Task Order No. ~ evidencing its issuance by
OWNER and acceptance by ENGINEER.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A Professional Corporation
OWNER
By:
By:
Principal
By:
Principal
-8-
~ U
:..-:
0 :..t.l
:.; d
'-' z. 5:
::s -::
:::: 0 C
..; :...J :.,.
:..t.l i2
'- ~ 6
:...i ~
.:::: ;..J ..... :::l
;::: Z (.:. Z
/. :..t.l 0 -::
~ .- ~
~ ;-
...., f-
~ G ;-
:-
-:: :J
.? ::.;
~ -::
;..,
....;
-:: ~ 0 -r "" ..,. =:> ..,. <', =:> r. '" or. 1 or. '" -r ::;: ;:::
~Jn(lll IlquL 0 '" 'r) or. r, '" or. ::;:
~ - ..,. N N ..,. "'" ..,. - .r) - - '" - - - - - - -
'"
0 'r) "" "" N :;:-. D <'I 8 0 "" "" 'r) ::> --. 7- I"-- 0 <>- ~
.....l 0 :;:-. ,. 'f"I 0 'f"I ..,. ..c 'n .", 7- '" or. or. I"-- or' ~ 'n :;>
< - '" N. N ~ :::-.. -.::>. on 1"--. ,. '" I"-- ::> 'f"I "T, '" 21 I"-- ~
'SO,) 1"1".1. '" on" M M "1' --. ..,. ~ 'r) :;:-. ,r," :::; ;::j r- "'" '" :;; .,., ..,. -i
~ N - - --. - - - - - '"
'"
if, if, Vl V'> V'> Vl or. Vl Vi if, <A 'A '/l <A V, <A 'A V, 'A ""
.'!: 0 0 C 0 21 ::> 0 ::> 0 -:::> '='
'-' 21 -:::> 21 8 8 -:::> '0 0 0 -:::> '='
t 'r. ~tJlJUlJd - - - - - - - - on N t("~
Q c, -
VI Vl Vl Vl Vl if, Vl Vl Vi Vl ""
.::: ;}Ul,\~.\m~ '"~ 0 0 0 '0 ::> 0 0 M ;;;
- - w
:;
~ "" ..c 'T i5i
1 IC:)UIJ:l13 0 0 -:::> '0 0 '0 ..,. - ""
w
:>
:r.
'" ..,. "T ~
l~nlln;)LPS "" :xl "" "" x x "" '" ,. -
N N - c;
:r. \:j~~II! leL 'sr;'lt;:1:!'i:;'.on N C X ..,. '" '" r, .c ,..., 0 c '" ;:
:::: - x - "" ..,. N ..,. C". M - --. ..,. - '" ,::.
'" w
0
:::r::
z. U!:I.Jl..;.\I:'II!N n ~
-:: :0 oc 0 N 0 :::> ""
,..., ..,. - ,. .=:> x "T ,;.
.;0; " Ju:a\pV P!"IUlP;J-.L w
...
.... '"
0 '"
::0 .~ -
::; ~ 1.l~..t....tISY ~n~r.) x 0 '"~ N ".
"" -r -r :0 --. r, OC X ...,. X - iil
!{lSI.\PV ('tl....fUlp.;:.L - w
~
i::
0 .n '" .0 X x x ,..., .0 \D
JjJW~U:1 ~I'i;l(l -r x x ..,. "" ...,. '" 0 "" "" ".
-r - N "" - c -? :::- .c .c 'n 'n c - "" '"
'"
l"'lo;'llllilll~l 1);\(OId .c .c '" c .0 "" .c "" x .c N c N 0 0 ..,. 0 '"
"" x ..,. '"
- .c - - - - "" N ...,. --. <'I - "" ..,. '" '" 'n '"
oddl~'.l. UII.l. ..,. .,. x ..0 0 .", x .:;, .,. ;;:
1.,,:.1'-c1l1-:1r'J n.1((lJd Xl '" .,. 00 ..,. N -r N r, - - ....., - --. '" - 00 ...,. 00 .... (i\
N w
c
E 'r.
'" '" OJ)
g g " " ::E
::;; .E: .~ ~
:; '-' -;;
;l " ;:: ... E
z. ; I " ~ ::! "'" .2
0 '" "
~ ~ ~ Jl ::> '" ~ 2 " -;;
r. " ...
2 ~ ::> 0- "
:: ;> ] -:J .;: :,,: "" "" U
] " " ~ j
- E u " ~ S ;:: ... "" c: '"
:::: ;; " :::: ~ '"
v ~ .;0; " 2' ::, " ;.; ;; " Ii :::.; "
:::: :l ::5 E r. 2 o;J) " E E E U
:r. .- 2 "2 " r. :::: ::>
W .>:; "0 ""' " c. ;; E E " ~
? s " -;:;
c. ~~ c: "" ." P.. ~ " t: ~ " 5
;r. " .= '" ~ '" Ii Ii ~ " Z; " " 0 c:
:.G - "'I c: '-' ... " .5 " E ." 0: " c:
~ c: C "0 "" " ~ .:c 2- .E ::: :,., a:: a) 0
:r. v " " '-' ::> ] S 'f) ~ :::: ~
Ci :; 0 " ~ .'3 " C '-
~ " .~ " ....l :::: .:: ;r. ~ 0 i ::, Ii "
" ~ " -'!. -= 'l1 :3 Cf P..
~ ~ -:J " -;; -:J " ~ f- e::. r. " ~. E "-l
;:; r. 51 ~ :.-. " " " r;:;
:t " " c: ::;: J.. C ~' c 1 ~ c: 0
"" t;' U " ;- ~ -:J
" C. .<; '" 0... s: '" ~ ~ 2 ~
-;: lJ g ~ - ::! -:J ;;
. ::, " ."" , 3 '-' c: ~ " ,:; ,: ::, ;; , ;: ,.g
'" " o:!: ~ " :;
- ;3: ~ ct N a i.i: 0 :is ..., :c J: " u ::5 is 10: ..,. :5
.:>: ~ ~ Zl f- .:>: Zl "-l
r. - M 'r. - M ...., ...,. on .0 ~ - <", --, "1 'n '" I"-- ~ - N ""
" " "
- - - N <', "" '" N <". "" ..... --. "'" "" "" ...... ..,. -r ..,.
is
:A
'"
""
'"
b
'"
"
'"
Y>
N
=
;;;;
Q
Y>
'"
Y>
;:q
'A
.....
,...,
....,
~
~
~ ~
~
;; :J\,I~mu{1
~
~
e :JUI.\..'\JnS
",
~
'J)
~]lJl''''I3:
p:'Ll~t.;aJ):l'S
Q
2 SJil~J'tIQ. 'S-J~u:l.~~a
/:.
<:
;:::: ~
~ ~
~ Ln:;Ll'\'.''i'::~N B
g ~
,. JO'il.,PV p;JlUlp~ 1
~ ~
'"
~
~ J)OnI.j5V SIt'I)
~
U IO'j.1.\PV ft::m.t~p;}l
J;I~UI~U:J u3"t-S:"'O
1;);lUt:Ju3I:lo:)fOJd
Olddl~.;a 1 wll
J)S~Ul!5'\1 L,.;ltOld
O!:
o
r:
e:
"
u
'"
'"
::>
~
'"
...:
!-
1'S:~
~ R ~
a. ::;
-5~e g
~ "!j i:;
~:i:i ~.
~r~- 'U
~' ~i~ ~
g:~'~ 0
i::,o v 2
:g' ~
v E
~ ~
::;:::;:
...:). ,...., QO:
"" ..,.
'T r-.J ...... Cl:)l
,Q!
I'"
,-I
I
I
....,
or.
:!
,
,.,'
;0:
0
=>
0
,
,,.,
.0 ~ .. .
..,.
'"
~
1=1
I .
I !
J~i
0:
0'
o
0,
,0
o
'"
,
OQl:Q
, i
';:,;
:::! ~:~
o
..,.'
,
; "7 r""-.J ,....~
,g,7 f"'.I g
! I
!'71N1~ :IJ
.Cr:)'N:~
i
~"'I l;Qi
'- ..oj
I
,
!.,'"f' ~ M
,-!""
,::J,'''''l''' N ('0,1
-M-V;
~o ......
"1'".........-.
I
I
I 1 I
, I '
....,.,~ ~:::o~~1
!
..,.
~
i '
;"'1':-.0 .,.. :(Il~l
l i I
I i
f I : !
1-.~>D~QQ.lo:'T':;::'
:"'j- .' ....,
I
.....-!"'1' :0'..0
I
, I
I ~ ! I i
j'-'A ~-OQ o:r I-:r-!r~ I
'I I
~ !
i
!
; ,
.....1'00
OO!~ -iN
E ~
5..,e
tl ~
'"
';:l
o
o
,
eoi~ ~ ""'I~;
c. '" , '" '("'I ::10 O,N N
'0 r"';;; ~
"'7fl:""1 ..., "', '..... -'~ ~"'T!M "':
""I:::! '" <> ":1<l~ioo~;.o ~. '" .::?: :IQ'~ ~
"" ; : i 1 i
! 1 . r I
I I I
, ,. -ri...,.,~ I I
00: jCQ c. ;::;-T-QO~~1
!
'" '" '" '" ",!
!
~ <> N '" ~:::; .0 N
-..... "'
=> 0
"'=t".-r
I ,
':o::lj~I==::= ~
I : ~
l"1"l~I:o:~ ~I' II
; ! !
I I
'" ,,1..,....,.1::::'
! 5 '
:: J.E i ~
I ~- "":ll-o
I [I> ~I e
2' 010
!t!~! ~
~ Q ~ ,:E
Jlfll
i,j l-1;j ~
~ ~:o..
'..J 0,......
-O..,! ,U') U. 0
~'~ ~:g
8 .~ ~ 1 e 0
I:I!: t': _
~ 1) I \.l c..'.J:l
8~:iJ:~
'"
~
'"
w
u
c;
;::
'"
'"
~
uJ
?
t:l
~
uJ
"
co
"'
g
uJ
E
~
c:
~
~
G
I
::J Streamline and improve quality of building permit process.
:J Continued development of the depanment to become more efficient
organized, and productive through process improvement and staff
development.
::J Develop standardized fee structure for development and commercial plan
review! inspection.
::J Annual review of sewer and water user fees to validate that they are accurate
and fair.
::J Continued assessment of staff requirements necessary to keep pace with City
growth and service demands.
?T~pc
· WWTP Build-out Plan and facilitv Plan Update - (This is in CO/~ilff1C[jon
H'ith f1Vaste'\cvaler Dept). Develop build-out plan for wastewater treatment
facility; conduct analysis and engineering studies; create bid document;
advel1ise RFP for engineering consultant; select consultant; develop plan;
submit plan for public hearings and to City Council for revie\v and adoption;
after adoption, proceed with construction plans and complete facility. Total
estimated planning time- 1.5 years; cost estimated at $,80,000; competed by
-=)-1-03; total staff time estimated- 300 man-hours over 18 months.
· Stonn water drainage - Prepare and submit Phase [l Storm Water
application to E.P.A. by March 10,2003. This E.P.A.-mandated task is
expected to be coordinated with Ada County Highway District, Idaho
Transportation Department and possibly Nampa & Meridian lITigation
District and Settlers liTigation District. Although this is a new program and
costs are difficult to estimate, we expect at least 200 hours of staff time to
guide the preparation the application and implement the program and 200 to
400 hours of time per year to administer the program after implementation.
Annual program operating costs cou ld exceed $50,000 for administration,
storm water related permitting and enforcement. Source of funding for this
program must be identi fied.
91)
FY ~o()~-~nn3 S fR.\ IF(;IC f',.\,-
:J To reduce the amount of illegal dumping in the City and rural areas.
:J To reduce contract costs and turnaround time associated with lab testing.
:J To reduce to zero the number of sewer backups from any preventable
cause.
o To increase the number of associations and businesses voluntarily
complying with City pre-treatment ordinances.
:J To reduce the number of construction design problemsl inaccuracies
OCCUlTing due to insufficient plan review.
o To reduce the number of preventable equipment failures due to
insufficient redundancy or maintenance processes.
o To reduce equipment and time lost due to inadequate inventory control
systems.
:J To reduce the number of lost time days due to injury accidents.
o To increase the level, quality, and frequency of professional development
and training.
. Develop build-out plan for expansion of the Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WWTP) from present 5.5 mgd to 9.0 mgd and update Facility Plan Study
(FPS). Consultant selection will occur in March 2002 with project
completion in early 2003. Cost estimate is $200,000 over two budget years.
Build-out plan will include 50% design drawings and specifications for all
process, hydraulic and electrical components in modular form enabling
expedited design schedules in the future to match development growth rates.
Finalized FPS will require public hearings and enable the City to qualify for
he State Revolving Loan Fund.
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
. Within five years, the plant is scheduled to complete the existing upgrade
plan, adding at least a #4 primary clarifier, two new screw pumps, a step
screen, second centrifuge, third blower, third aeration basin, two tertiary
108
FY 2002-2003 STRA fl'{,le PL'\N
2
HE'ad\Norl<3lvea Influent receiving, weenJng. waIDlng .and
c:ompacting. Influent pumping. gnz: removaJ
3 Primary Treatment Primal}' ciariflers, primal}' 5ludge pumping and
contro~
Secondary TrealT.rlent Selector/aeration basins. b/-owers, secondary
clarifiers, nutrient removal. IV'.W'AS pumping
5 Tertiary Treatment A/tration. post ile-ratlon. dj.sJnrection, erfk.Jel1t
disposal
6 Bi-csolrds Stablnzatlon Treatment plant solids- thickening. digestlon. gas
hand~ng
Blosonds- Disposal Bio3Ollds pumping. dewatetlng. hand~ng.
Oisposar. centrat-[' stor.age and re-ed
Power .and standby power. potable .and p1ant
B Plant Utility Sy>terru water S)'>lerru, natural gas ",pply, plant SCAIJA
S)'>lem
3
---.. Modular Approach
~ - .. Non-Polable H,O Sludr
4
5
6
(
7
8
July 19,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
July 23, 2002
ITEM NO.
6
REQUEST Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
,Y
II
-R- ~ . fL \/
wff1l!V ,feVlW{rf '~"\- rY
OTHER:
.See AttG1Gh9d Sample Nstice and Billing Directives
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of MerIdian.
'r.,...Tv..........................M......E.......:...I.'0"1 A/N.........................................../.........................................................,........,.................:,:................
"V '.I'YTofc ...R.. M ...::......:.........:............:.... ':." ......... .
.E<).2Y.O...O)3>i.t......:.............t/Y.t.........:.....:.......'iL........a../ii/t"........//i... ............... '.
{Fl' . . . . .... .. en al'leulJ. 'g. e ...:.:..... ....
(.-, ".;::':.-':.n,-"::_n'.;-.:...::,",::,._..:,::,',. :.:.:.',-.:._..:.-'.'.-.::,.'.-......_.,.::__.-......:_,_,:_':.;.:'.-.:....:....;:.:.",::,.>'~..-,-:.::.:_:...;,-.:;.::.:. _ .:,-.,":.::._:..""
REVENUES
General Fund
Fund Balance for Locust Grove Overpass
Park Impact Fund Balance
Fund Balance for Police Carry Forward
Fund Balance for Parks Carry Forward
Special Services
TOj;AL($~rt~t~I.~t.li1dREVENUEs".'i//"""" .
EXPENDITURES
Admin
Admin Carry Forward
Police
Police Carry Forward
Fire
Parks
Parks Carry Forward
Special Services
TOTALG~h.~f~I...j::lJridEXPENDITlJRES.i..\............/................. .'.
REVENUES
Enterprise Fund
Enter rise Retained Earnings for Car
TOTAL..Er\t~rpti~~i#lirid...REVENUE$............./...........' .............. .
EXPENDITURES
Enterprise Fund
Car Forward for Water & WWTP
,"rO-rAl.J..E~t~.~~fi~~FlJHd.EXPEN..OITtXRES............../...................................
REVENUES EXPENDITURES
10,657,105
1,800,000
210,000
269,000
1,247,229
1,832,019
1,724,591
1,800,000
5,113,927
269,000
2,609,094
1,419,493
1,247,229
1,832,019
GENERAL FUND
Council FY2003 Budget Summary
FY2002 General Fund Revenues 9,920,368
'FY2003Pr()p()~eciRever1lJ~S '
Department PERSONNEL
49,885
173,575
117,905
149,003
55,425
Council
City Clerk Office
Mayor's Office
Finance
Human Resources
Other Government
Police Department
Fire Department
Parks Department
3,558,685
1,874,270
445,300
.......... ~. 10,657,105
OPERATING Merit TOTAL
69,000 118,885
105,000 4,389 282,964
36,200 1,282 155,387
64,500 5,711 219,214
33,600 2,912 91,937
660,414 660,414
944,015 14,221 4,516,921
290,775 7,703 2,172,748
253,040 12,os8 710,398
less
less
TOTAL BUDGET BASE
6,424,048
2,456,544 48,276 $ 8,928,868
less Park Impact Fees (reserved revenue)
GENERAL FUND Available Balance
$
336,000.00
1,392,237
less 3%
iF.'erform~n7ce:Ti1C'feases:",L ;::\';,';:Z'
2%
32,184 I;".''''''
3%
;;;:J!:;I~~it6'E.
4%
64,368
less .~$ 1,191,642
Enhancements: PERSONNEL OPERATING 1 time exp TOTAL
other 1 Treasure Valley Transit
other 2 Meridian Development Corp 40,000 40,000
other 3 VictimIWitness Coordinator
other 4 Maintenance Person
other 5 100yr celebratlon 20,000 20,000
I Other Subtotals 60,000 60,000 I
clerk 1 City Clerk Dept Specialist 36,225 (9,900) 26,325
finance 1 IT Coordinator 34,450 (34,650) 3,200 3,000
HR 1 HR Analyst 25,552 1,750 3,200 30,502
Admin Subtotals 96,226 (42,800) 6,400 59,826
police 1 New Building Operations Adj 15,000 15,000
police 2 Evidence Technician 26,803 2,000 28,803
police 3 3 Trafffc Personnel (12months) 165,672 6,380 54,671 226,723
police 4 Crime Analyst 38,705 5,000 8,000 51,705
police 5 Entry Level Records Clerk 34,901 750 3,000 38,651
police 6 Corporal DesIgnation Addition 17,474 1,000 18,474
police 7 Crlminallnv. Promotlonallnc 2,650 20,500 23,150
police 8 3 Patrol Officers (6months)
police 9 3 Patrol Officers (9months)
police 10 Fine Collection Officer 14,000 14,000
Police Subtotals 283,555 45,780 87,171 416,506
fire 1 Fire Station #3 13,949 147,200 161,149
fire 2 9 Intra Firefighters (5 months) 181,991 23,162 205,153
fire 3 Fire Inspector
fire 4 Part.time Office Assistant
fire 5 Equipment 46,694 46,694
fire 6 Opticoms (4) 11,840 11,840
fire 7 Train & Equip new Part.time On-C 1,110 7,400 8,510
I Fire Subtotals 183,101 21,349 228,896 433,346 I
parks 1 Grounds Keeper I
parks 2 Land Borup Property 181,000 181,000
parks 3 Settle r's Pa rk Road 1m prove 131,000 131,000
parks 4 Chateau Park Playground 38,000 38,000
parks 5 Computer Network Server
parks 6 Park Maintenance Equipment
parks 7 Bear Crk RestrmlBasketball Ct
parks 8 Storey Park Redev Phase II
parks 9 Adventure Island
Pol rks S u btota Is
less $ (479,036)
impact fees bUdgeted to spend 546,000
Increase Capital Improvement Fundi $ 66,9641
7/23/20028:42 PM Gen Sum
SPECIAL SERVICES FUND
Council FY2003 Budget Summary
FY2002 Special Services Revenues 1,474,500
. -... - -. , ....
· FY20()3 Proposed Revenues,
., ...... -,"
" ',.--.
, ' , , ,," - . .
, $ . 1,832,019
Department PERSONNEL OPERATING 1x Exp TOTAL
Planning & Zoning 342,055 212,075 8,892 563,022
transit dues 66,346 66,346
Code Enforcement 41,480 2,800 1,356 45,636
Building Dept 72,290 699,925 1,915 774,130
less TOTAL BUDGET BASE 455,825 981,146 12,163 $ 1,449,134
less
SPECIAL SERVICES Available Balance
$
382,885
less 3% re~'ifqrm~'Q~~Hncr~a'~'l3'~i'g.:ri'!:);r!;i:1f!'::;ir:::':;';':.r:
2% 3%
8,1 09 frr.; ::rfrrfri:&?[1[~..i:
4%
16,217
less
~ $
367,885
Enhancements:
Code Enforcement
Planner II
39,266
53,451
2,560
14,900
3,000
56,726
56,451
less
$
254,708
plus
IT Coordinator will reduce computer exp by
10,000
Increase Capital Improvement Fundi $
264,708 I
7/23/20028:45 PM
SS Sumwcodeenforce
(
ENTERPRISE FUND
Council FY2003 Budget Summary
FY2002 Enterprise Revenues 11,092,500
',' "$< 11,706, 190
. FY2003proposed Revenues'
Department PERSONNEL
Public Works 713,105
2/3 compass dues (Enterprise & SS)
MUBS 219,320
Water 726,510
WWTP 1,316,090
TOTAL BUDGET BASE
OPERATING Merit TOTAL
73,600 13,704 600,409
9,936 9,936
189,875 5,346 414,541
1,736,649 16,106 2,479,265
1,906,439 33,695 3,256,224
3,916,499 66,851 $ 6,962,375
less
2,977,025
ENTERPRISE Available Balance
$ 4,745,615
less 3%
rg~E(Q:rm~~Y~e,ilneY~~~~~,;)!';5:;it5D'
2%
45,901
3%
"':;';j)%)it~l:~$Ij'j
4%
91,802
less ~I 4,703,015
Enhancements; PERSONNEL OPERATING 1 time exp TOTAL
PW 1 GIS Needs Analysis 10,000 10,000
PW 2 Storm Water Permit Consult 10,000 4,500 14,500
PW 3 Technology Improvement 1,700 7,700 9,400
PW 4 Major Vehicle Repair 3,000 3,000
PW 5 New VehiCle 2,500 21,230 23,730
PW 6 Staff Engineer 70,344 1.800 7,100 79,244
PW 7 Microfilming 2,000 2,000 4,000
PW B Document Binder/Bookshelves 1,000 1,000
PW Subtotals 70,344 18,000 56,530 II 144,8741
MUBS 1 Direct Pay Module 2,500 2,500
MUBS 2 Front Counter Replacement 11,500 11,500
MUBS Subtotals 14,000 14,000
Water 1 Well Technician 45,459 4,200 21 ,400 71,059
Water 2 Well 24 Construction 80,000 80,000
Water 3 Well 26 Construction 350,000 350,000
Water 4 Well 25 Construction 300,000 300,000
Water 5 Water Rights Acq Consulting 85,000 85,000
Water 6 Distribution Map System 2,000 2,000
Water 7 Water Line Extensions 600,000 600,000
Water 8 Chemistry Analysis for Wells 20,000 20,000
Water 9 Well 27 Construction 200,000 200,000
Water 10 Telemetry System Upgrade 10,000 10,000
Water 11 Digline Software 1,000 1,000
WOlter ubtotals 45,459 4,200 1,669,400 1,719,059
WWTP 1 Microfilm Reader 5,150 52,600 57,750
WWTP 2 DAFT Construction 450,000 450,000
WWTP 3 Predesign of Capital Projects 50,000 50,000
WWTP 4 Boise River Outfall Repair 250,000 250,000
WWTP 5 WWTP Oper and Maint Manual 2,500 150,000 152,500
WWTP 6 WWTP Phone System Upgrade 1,000 15,000 16,000
WWTP 7 Centrate Basin 1,500 200,000 201,500
WWTP B Safety Consultant 35,000 35,000
WWTP 9 Digester Piping Modification 27,000 27,000
WWTP 10 WWTP Telemetry 20,000 20,000
WWTP 11 Black Cat Trunk 8, Lift Station 400,000 400,000
WWTP 12 WWTP Entrance Landscaping 23,000 23,000
WWTP Subtotals 1,672,600 1,682,750
less 1,142,332
less IT Coordinator 35,300
less IT Coordinator will reduce computer exp by (12,000) 1,119,032
less HR Analyst 27,302
this excess will be added to Enterprise retained earnings I $ 1,091,730 I
7/23/20028:43 PM Ent Sum
July 19,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
July 23, 2002
ITEM NO.
8
REQUEST Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
,~ Vllf-/
/Jut r
OTHER:
See Attached Sample Notice and Billing Directives
Phone:
Contacted:
Date:
MaterIals presented at public meetIngs shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN
OFF SCHEDULED FOR
07/24/02 and\or 07/31/02
CE
.J L 2 .~-:
CITY OF MERIOIAi\}
CITV CL r=RK llr=r-I(:F
MAYOR: This is to infonn you in writing, if you so
choose, that you have the right to a predetermination
hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, July 23, 2002, before the
Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged
on the facts and to defend the clailTI made by this City that
your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may
retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on
July 24, 2002 and\or July 31, 2002 unless payment is
received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to
contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency?
(No response.)
MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they Inay appeal
or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth
Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even
though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The
alTIOunt of the turn-off list is $22,315.96.
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquenl Accounl Lisl- council Page: 1
Standard Paymenl Customers Jul 23.2002 09:03am
Current Period, 07/3112002
No Delinquenl Minimum AmountDelinquenl Balance
Report Criteria,
Terminated customers nol included
Cuslomer,Cust No = {<} 9900000
Lasl Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 0513112002 04/3012002 03131/2002 Dale Amount Msg
15,0029,2 HALL, JOHN & CAROLYN 109.44 74.02 35.42 06118/2002 4684 -
4,0552,1 ABBEY BEN 104,66 71.83 32,83 05/2112002 55,82 -
2.1930.2 ACUNA, JULIO & 120,24 85,76 34.48 0511512002 91.01 -
74,3236,1 ADAMS. MICHAEL & MARY 178,82 105,90 52.92 20,00 05107/2002 44,31 - none
42.2370.3 AIKMAN. WILLIAM 146.42 49,56 96,86
32.0538,2 AINGER, DAVID 152.12 141,05 11,07 07/11/2002 33.11 -
2.4740,1 ALBRECHT. JUDY 164.45 126.56 37,89 07109/2002 29.28 - none
50.0244.1 ALGER,BRENT 90,03 63.35 26.68 06/26/2002 53.36 - none
50,1476,1 All & FARHA ISHAQ, SABIHA 1,203.50 840,98 362,52 06/2612002 619,00 - none
37.3822,1 ALLEN. SCOTT 69.41 56.78 12.63
31.3422,1 ALLEN, TIM 162,54 119,89 41,85 ,80 06/18/2002 38.00 - none
19,6556.2 AMAR. STEVE 83,79 57.11 26.68 06/1 7/2002 53,36 -
32.4858.1 AMERICAN DREAM HOMES 31,29 24.81 6.48
15,0126,2 AMOUREUX. RAMON & TEClA 125,94 79,15 46,79 05/22/2002 142,97 -
21.1920,3 ANDERSON, BRENT & SEIDL, S 113.79 65,52 48,27 07117/2002 100.00 -
21.2254,1 ANDERSON, DAWN 132,66 89.43 43,23 06/18/2002 39,54 - none
32.1434.5 ANDERSON, LADELE 82,97 56.29 26,68 05/29/2002 80,04 -
19,7336.2 ANDERSON, MICHAEL 160,27 109,53 50,74 06/0712002 49.51 -
74.2758,3 ANDREW PROPERTIES 203.44 138,05 65.39 OS/29/2002 94.81 -
68,0310.1 ANJEWIERDEN, PAUL 121.71 84,78 36.93 06/21/2002 39.39 . none
42,1988,2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 255,16 190,74 64.42 06118/2002 63.35-
53.0700.1 ARNOLD MACHINERY 942,13 612.87 329,26 07/09/2002 329,26 - none
69,0530,1 ATCHISON, JEFFERY 21Q,52 163.61 46,91 06/14/2002 43.22 " none
33.1826,2 AYERS, DOVIE A, 109,33 78,96 30,37 05/17/2002 26,68 -
69,1620.1 BACHMAN, MICHAEL L 311.48 236,56 74.92 05/16/2002 48.27 . none
49,0901,1 BAGLEY, FREDRICK 39.50 31.40 8.10 11/27/2001 59,94 - none
21.1928,1 BAILEY. BRUCE R 243.89 200,63 43,26 06/1912002 50,00 - none
2.3550,2 BAILEY, PEGGY 129,50 81.86 31.88 15.76 04/2512002 150,00 "
51.0290.3 BAILEY. PEGGY 98,19 71.51 26.68 06113/2002 26.68 -
51,0694,1 BAILEY, PEGGY 71.32 66,72 4,60 07/09/2002 20.00 - none
33,1862,3 BAKER, JOHN 150.32 70,28 80.04 06/07/2002 57.45 .
69,0590,1 BAPTISTE. MONTGOMERY 263.08 263,08 11/20/2001 148,94 - none
1.2790,3 BARINSKY. CYNTHIA 165,28 11Q,36 38,02 16.90 04/17/2002 50,00 -
4,1620,6 BARNEY. MARY 184,08 148,37 35.71
21,0464,1 BARR. JERROD F 137,90 100,02 37.88 06/14/2002 42,96. none
2,0472,1 BARTH, JEFF 150.27 114,98 35,29 05/16/2002 53.36 . none
4.0546.2 BARTLETT. KEVIN 121.34 84,55 36,79 05/23/2002 48,52.
31.3060,1 BASTIAN, DAVID 172,80 133.40 39.40 06/1812002 45,00 - none
22.2522,1 BEACHWOOD BUILDERS 49,77 43.29 6,48
222524,1 BEACHWOOD BUILDERS 89.13 4329 45.84
138972.1 BEACHWOOD BUILDERS 49.77 43.29 6.48
14,50102 BEAUCANNON, JUSTIN 78,60 76,19 2.41 06/26/2002 4000.
1,0030,1 BEAUDOIN. JOHN R 103,69 72,31 31.38 06/18/2002 38,00 - none
69,0706,1 BELLAMY. DONALD 201,61 149,11 52,50 05/14/2002 29,13 - none
52,0324,1 BEST WESTERN RAMA INN 810,45 420,22 190.23 OS/28/2002 194.06 - none
52,03231 BEST WESTERN RAMA INN 92,86 7342 19,44 05/28/2002 486. none
52,03261 BEST WESTERN RAMA INN 2,348,90 1.80717 54173 05/28/2002 675,78 . none
14,3004.2 BEWLEY. SANDRA & DAVID 138.66 95,58 4308 06/17/2002 40,62 -
69,0270.1 BEZEMER. LAWRENCE 111.59 82,31 29.28 06/26/2002 38,17 - none
32.4068.3 BIGLEY, CYNTHIA 11067 7619 34.48 05109/2002 38.70 -
7202562 BIRDGE. RICHARD & TONI 125,97 77,94 48,03 OS/29/2002 78,54 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2
Slandard Payment Customers Jul 23.2002 09:04am
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquenl Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Lasl Pmt Last Pml
Cusl No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/31/2002 04/30/2002 03/31/2002 Date Amounl Msg
74.2724,1 BISHOP, CALVIN 160,02 115.43 44.59 06/13/2002 23.61 . none
21,01542 BITTICK. BRIAN 121,36 93.45 27.91 06/19/2002 26,68.
3,0308,1 BITTNER. MICHAEL 152,33 112,32 40,01 06/17/2002 4000 - none
2,0446.4 BOBKO, RAYMOND 258,73 142,17 116,56 06/24/2002 50,32 -
42,0408,1 BOBKO, RAYMOND 165.10 10096 64,14 06/19/2002 44.46 - none
31,0512,1 BOKMAN, HELEN 15677 111,51 45,26 06/17/2002 55,00 - none
34,1318,2 BOOHER. CRAIG & DANA 288,31 208,04 80.27 06/19/2002 49,52 -
5,0368,1 BOUDREAUX, JAMES 192,33 146,93 45.40 OS/21/2002 73,58 - none
51.4310,1 BOWER INVESTMENTS, LLP 71,96 28,20 16,88 26,88 04/22/2002 60.64 -
2,3670,4 BRAINBRIDGE, STEVE 107,96 75,00 32.96 06117/2002 3086 -
46,0300,1 BRANDNER. JAMES 157,33 109,05 48,28 05116/2002 50,74 - none
34,0420,1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 169.14 123,87 45,27 06117/2002 29.28 - none
1.0800,1 BREWER, SID & SHELLY 143,80 83,04 60,76 06/19/2002 94,46 - none
22,2282,2 BRICE. DAVID 87,54 58.41 29,13 OS/20/2002 58,26 -
1,3510,4 BRINEGAR. E, E, 86,67 57.11 29,56 06/18/2002 30,00 -
21.2564.4 BRINEGAR. KATHLEEN 103,18 58,58 12,63 18,78 13,19 03/20/2002 60DO -
74.3264,1 BROWN, MICHAEL & LISA 113,73 79,40 34,33 05/06/2002 68,52 - none
69.0566,1 BROWNELL DR 197,09 196.99 ,10 07/15/2002 61.81 - none
37,3844.2 BROWNN, KATHLEEN 123,19 83,80 39.39 05/17/2002 43,08.
42,0344.2 BRYTE, LUELLA 121,11 82,80 38.31 05/0712002 42,00 -
21.0510,2 BUNCH, NANCY 217.81 168.43 49.38 06/13/2002 56,92 -
34,0856,1 BURGESS, UN 227.46 227,37 ,09 07/12/2002 78,00 - none
2.4890.4 BURNES, EMMETT 172,32 125.54 46,78 OS/22/2002 70,63 -
50.4008.2 BURNHAM.DARLA 185,85 126.06 30,51 29.28 04124/2002 30,51 -
22.1516,1 BURTON, DEBRA 148.58 119.45 29,13 07/09/2002 32,82 - none
42,2460,1 BURTON. JACK 211.10 158,17 52,93 06/19/2002 48,17 - none
4,2308,1 BUTTERFIELD, CHARLES & TO 310.15 226.42 83,73 06/12/2002 85,00 . none
32,1452,1 BYRNE. JASON 167,30 167,30 01/22/2002 40,00 - none
50.0724.1 C,F,L INVESTMENTS 111.70 57,11 26,68 27,91 05/15/2002 3152 -
31.1274,1 CALLISON, JAMES & BARBARA 147,63 140,22 7.41 06/06/2002 3335 - none
34,1100,1 CALLISTER. BROCK 86,98 60,30 26.68 06/18/2002 26.68 . none
31,3536.2 CAMPBELL. SCOTT 112,93 57,11 26,68 29,14 04/0912002 26,68 -
42,0414.2 CAMPBELL, ROBERT 128.22 87,74 40,48 06/18/2002 36.79 -
21,2664,1 CAMPBELL, ROLLAND 139.25 122.10 17,15 06117/2002 50,00 - none
31,0010.1 CANDACE ADKINS 226,37 181.96 44.41 06/03/2002 17.49 - none
65.3136.1 CARLEY. RUSSELL 234,39 114.55 52,54 67,30 05/07/2002 61.15 - none
21.2880,1 CARLSON, JOYCE 197.48 145,93 51,55 06/17/2002 40.48 - none
2,4590,1 CARNAHAN. JOHN 111.16 81.88 29,28 06/18/2002 30,51 - none
34,1808.2 CARPENTER,DOUGLAS 168.45 134,11 34,34 OS/21/2002 90.00 -
4,2166.2 CARPENTER, SEAN 235,92 182,48 45.41 803 04/17/2002 11868 -
21,2834,1 CASE. CYRUS 196,61 162,28 34,33 06/03/2002 64.61 . none
50,2108,1 CASELLA, GARY 86.73 60,05 26,68 05/08/2002 26.68 - none
3,0850,2 CAST, PETER & VERIONICA 110.64 82,38 28,26 07/08/2002 30,00 -
34.2876,1 CATLETT, SCOTT 66.86 65,68 1,18 06/25/2002 30,00 - none
42,2582,1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 272,30 205.43 66,87 06127/2002 48,28 - none
50.1774.1 CHERRY'S BUILTIN VACS 21166 125.73 85,93 06/06/2002 65,29 - none
15,0047,2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 155,31 98,25 57,06 OS/22/2002 9426 -
5,069a 1 CHRISTMAN, MARIE ANN 228,73 159,96 68.77 05/16/2002 6592 - none
20.16063 CHRISWELL, LEE ANNA 175.42 138.49 36,93 04/26/2002 15168 -
32.1278,1 CHURCH. LARRY 157.29 96.55 34,06 26.68 05/17/2002 26,68 - none
7426761 CHURCHMAN, KAREN LEE 18964 143,95 45.69 06/18/2002 4000 - none
46,0284,1 CLARK. TROY 121.52 75,96 45.56 OS/29/2002 71 12. none
1,2020,2 CLEMENTS. ROBERT OR TONI 141,36 106,88 34.48
50.4570,1 CLEVENGER. TERRY 198.70 135,62 63,08 0512112002 73,08 - none
40,0066,1 COCHELl. TIM & ANGELlA 141.69 94.89 46,80 OS/29/2002 7497 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Nolice is to be senl
CITY OF MERIDIAN Dellnquenl Account List- council Page: 3
Slandard Payment Cuslomers Ju123,2002 09:05am
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquenl Minimum AmounlDellnquent Balance
Last PO'll Lasl Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/31/2002 04/30/2002 03/31/2002 Dale Amounl Msg
50,2122,1 COLE. DANIEL & RENEE 87,83 85.51 2,32 OS/29/2002 40,00 - none
51,0874,1 COLE. ORVILLE 7710 55.57 21,53 06106/2002 40,00 - none
51,4170,4 COLSON, HOWARD 82,57 74,86 7.71
65,3092,5 CONRAD, GERALD 12001 84,30 35,71 05/30/2002 3817 -
21 .1524.2 COONES. JOSEPH 225,80 152,19 73,61 OS/22/2002 140,87 -
74,3816.1 CORDELL, TODD 128,05 128,05 07/18/2001 80,00 - none
4,0120.2 CORONA, JUAN & VICTOR 125,20 121.73 3,47 07/12/2002 5000 -
4.1746,1 COSGROVE. AMY 143,68 110,86 32,82 06/18/2002 68,26 - none
31,3420,1 COUCH. JULIA 109,56 81.63 27.93 06/20/2002 30,00 - none
35,0182,2 COVINO, AMMON & CRYSTAL 105,12 105,11 .01 06/21/2002 6,92 -
40.0002,1 COX, RICHARD 88.69 62,01 26,68 OS/29/2002 26.68 " none
74.0100.2 CRAWFORD. SARAH 100,29 72.01 28.28 07/17/2002 30,00 -
37.3242,1 CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN 70.71 44,03 26,68 06/13/2002 6,48-
50.3928,1 CROASDALE, DENA 82,97 56,29 26,68 05/14/2002 53,36 - none
74,2336.1 CROWELL, GARY 228,18 168,68 59,50 06/06/2002 50,89 - none
22,1149.1 CRYSTAL SPRINGS HOMEOW 406,70 312,74 93.96 01/02/2002 221.94 - none
69.0714,1 CULVER,MARY 227,23 174.35 52.88 06/18/2002 50,00 - none
74.2505,1 CW CONSTRUCTION 163,96 136,42 27,54 11/06/2001 42.12 -
74.0378,1 DAILEY, CHARLES 17723 132,63 44.60 05/10/2002 50.91 - none
19,1028,1 DANIEL FOUTZ 84,06 71.10 6,48 6,48
50.4574.3 DAROSA, JOE 137.54 80,42 27,91 29,21 04/16/2002 169,00 -
22,1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 114.80 83,11 31.69 06/18/2002 43,00 - none
13,5004,1 DAVIS. MICHAEL & TIFFANY 127,80 83.32 44.48 OS/23/2002 72.51 -
74,1058,1 DAVIS. NORMA 89,19 62,51 26,68 OS/21/2002 148,97 - none
33.2414.2 DAVIS, WALTER 200.15 142.95 57.20 OS/29/2002 89,20 -
33,0282.1 DAY, ETHEL 72.26 69.80 2.46 06/13/2002 80.04 - none
21.3070.1 DECK. KIMBERLY 178,05 144.88 33,17 06/19/2002 60.00 - none
34.2762,1 DENNEY, ROBERT 107,68 97.52 10,16 06/18/2002 55.00 - none
46.6010,1 DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED 209,41 140.89 48,72 19,80
46,5030,1 DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED 127,11 68,43 38,88 19,80
50 1356,3 DICKERSON, DAVID 107.69 54,33 26.68 26,68 04/09/2002 53.36 -
74,3820.2 DIMAYA. FEDELlNO 129.63 81,61 48,02 OS/29/2002 81.12-
6.1012.2 DIXON, CRAIG 62,37 42,89 19,48 OS/2012002 19,48 -
69,0490,1 DIXON. SCOTT & HEATHER 83,4 7 77.25 6.22 06/1812002 35,00 - none
3,0720,1 DOBARAN. JOHN & ARVELLA 51,31 24.43 26.88 05/30/2002 82,84 - none
30730,1 DOBARAN, JOHN & ARVELLA 314,99 79,71 48.88 186,40 05/30/2002 569.20 - none
4.1838.2 DONLON. DANIEL & ROBIN 112,44 112,36 ,08 07/11/2002 26.60 -
42,1200,1 DOOLEY, DAVID & LESLIE 119,74 81,86 37,88 06/18/2002 31,73 - none
31.0828,3 DOWNI E, JASON D 153,32 124,26 29,06 06/19/2002 21,41 -
4.1312,2 DREPPS, NICHOLE 136.58 94,58 42,00 05/10/2002 78,94 -
4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 229.77 187,92 41.85 05/15/2002 90.84 - none
19,0072.2 DUGGINS. ROY & ALTHEA 71.82 52,69 19,13 OS/20/2002 88,26 -
1450042 DUNCAN. JEFF & MONIGUE 86,06 86.05 ,01 06/17/2002 50,86 -
743802.1 DUNN. MIKE 99,00 66.18 32.82 05131/2002 29.13 - none
34,2802,1 DUNSTAN. BRETT & MICHELLE 182,65 139.57 43,08 05120/2002 74,95 - none
4,1958,1 DUPLEX, HARRY 230,10 174,58 55,52 05124/2002 52.11 - none
68,0102,2 DURHAM. KYLE 68,84 59.23 9,61 04/18/2002 120,00 -
2,1690,3 EBLEN, EARL 39,14 3914
743370.2 ECHIPARE. DOMINADOR 93,98 63.47 30,51 05/15/2002 59,79 -
31 30341 EDWARDS, MARILYN 98,80 62,12 36,68 OS/29/2002 80,04 - none
502418,1 EHLERT. DEAN & KIMBERLY 107.01 76,50 30,51 OS/28/2002 6225 - none
22,1140,2 ELLIOTT. JOE 104,29 6,48 39,53 5828 03/2812002 142,52 -
50,2232,1 ELLIS, JOHN 93,10 63.97 29,13 06/25/2002 2913 - none
42,2302,1 ELLISON, AUBREY & LYNN 14601 105.67 40,34 06104/2002 6824 - none
245403 ELSPERMAN. DE WAYNE 139,86 86,50 26,68 26,68 04116/2002 53,36 -
... In Msg column indicales no Nolice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinq uent Account List- council Page: 4
Standard Payment Customers Jul 23,2002 09:06am
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquenl Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/31/2002 04/30/2002 03/31/2002 Date Amount Msg
31,3062,3 EMERSON. DON 110.82 7010 30.51 10.21 04/1712002 46,00 -
3107221 EMPEY, DAVID 140.86 10148 3940 05/21/2002 36,94 - none
42124,1 ENGELUND, CARTER & KAREN 164,13 146,91 17,22 06/07/2002 75,11 - none
50 1238.2 ERHART, MILT 210,66 7694 5186 43,09 38,77 04/02/2002 11.20 -
50,1240,3 ERHART, MILT 114.61 7767 3694 05/09/2002 3940 -
50,1234,2 ERHART, MILTON 7349 4661 26.68 05116/2002 53.36 -
32,1152.2 ESPINOLA, MIGUEL & MARGAR 145,30 91.47 44,04 9,79 05108/2002 50.00 -
2,0320.1 ESTEP, NINA 83,34 61,94 21.40 0710312002 30,00 - none
50,3822,1 EVANS, M, SHAE 119.64 85,30 34,34 05122/2002 66,22 - none
51.0648,1 EVANS, ZACH 20,00 20,00
424050.1 EVERMAN, BRYAN 14187 97,27 44,60 06/25/2002 45.83 - none
1,2280,1 FELDMANN. CARRIE 122,18 107.42 14.76 06/25/2002 34,19 - none
74,0104.1 FERGUISON, RANDALL C 218.66 167.38 51.28 05/31/2002 60.74 - none
2.2560,1 FERNANDES, JOHN 145.62 106,64 38.98 06/19/2002 27,91 - none
4,1846,1 FERRY, MIKE & TRACY 138,50 137,54 ,96 06/19/2002 80,00 - none
31,3238.1 FIFE, LARRY 107.72 78.44 29.28 05128/2002 29.28 - none
21.3008.1 FIFE, PRISCILLA 141.31 101.11 40.20 OS/28/2002 29,13 - none
20,1438,3 FINKBEINER. PAUL 206.91 156.44 50.47
74,1006.1 FISHEL, GEORGE 658.48 509,13 149,35 06/18/2002 147,01 - none
74,0328.4 FISHEL. GEORGE 160,05 113.28 46,77 05/17/2002 95,39 -
32.0568,1 FISHER, MELVIN 93,33 66.41 26,92 OS/29/2002 40,00 - none
2,0740,1 FISK, PATRICK 228.75 159.94 68.81 06/19/2002 78,25 - none
2,1660,3 FLYNN, MELANIE 125,53 122,79 2.74 06/17/2002 49,37 -
46,0362,1 FORD, MARVIN & SANDRA 145.46 79,89 36,96 28.61 OS/29/2002 40.00 - none
52,0150,1 FORS. GARY 76,61 50.57 26,04 07/01/2002 27,00 - none
21,0190,1 FOX. TRAVIS 133.48 131.96 1,52 07/08/2002 40.35 - none
31,3434.1 FRANK, GARY 154,93 119,82 35.11 06/19/2002 50,00 - none
65,0790,1 FRANK, JERRY 159,95 140,84 19,11
313050,1 FRENCH,DEBRA 139,23 96.33 42.90 05/31/2002 70.00 - none
21.2828,1 FRIEND. RICHARD 122.44 84,28 38.16 06106/2002 39.39 - none
22.2506.2 FRIES, CHRS & TRACY 146.45 95,83 50.62 OS/22/2002 91.36 -
34.2856.1 FROSTROM, ED & KATHY 171.43 159,71 11,72 07/09/2002 40,00 - none
14,3526,2 FUCHS. PATRICK & KIMBERLE 97.23 60,55 36,68 OS/22/2002 57,19 -
50.4518,3 GAMBLIN, MIKE 143.43 142,16 1.27 06/18/2002 110.00 -
50,1996,2 GARCIA. CHRISSY 107,93 107,32 .61 06/25/2002 53.00 -
33.2302,1 GARRARD. DALE 94.57 69,12 25.45 07/03/2002 29.28 - none
46,0188.2 GATES. JOHN 149,92 64,70 29,28 29.28 26,66 04/16/2002 40,00 -
22,1596.3 GIAUOUE, PAUL 144,30 106.13 38,17 06/17/2002 36.94 -
42,0366,1 GILLUM, DERICK & AMY 155,11 109.57 45,54 05/15/2002 40.62 . none
50262,2 GLINES. MARK & YVONNE 218,49 137,05 51.98 29.46 06/10/2002 51,98 -
2,1170,3 GODBY, ORVILLE & PHOEBE 218.83 176,03 42,80 06/19/2002 37,88 -
25.4050.2 GOEBEL. DANIEL & CAROLINE 153,94 81,29 38,17 34.48
50,2082,1 GORDON, MIKE & MARSHA 74.47 53,35 21.12 01/0212002 220,00 - none
21,2790,1 GORRINGE. BENNY 125,78 16.4 8 47.19 62,11 04/17/2002 114,22 - none
6 9858,1 GO CONSTRUCTION 44,09 27,21 16.88 05/16/2002 1688 -
312280,1 GRAFFIS, TODD & TERESA 142.65 106,65 36.00 05/20/2002 62 00 . none
510958,3 GRIEVE. JAMES 71,95 29.57 21.19 21,19 04/05/2002 19,96 -
3101581 GRIFFIN, RICHARD & GAIL 15727 113,90 43,37 06/19/2002 36,50 - none
50,2412,3 GRISHAM, DANIEL & JANET 11449 7646 38,03 06/17/2002 44.71 -
33.4262,2 GROOM. DENNIS 134.27 99,93 34,34 07/02/2002 4186 -
30034,1 GROUND. JENNIFER 105,50 73,77 3173 05/1 5/2002 7592 - none
69 0206,3 GROVES. CRAIG 10553 7502 30,51 OS/28/2002 30.51 -
2104623 GUNNARSON, HOWARD & RUT 155.52 103,65 51,87 06/10/2002 93,00 -
35,0415,2 GYLLENSKOG, CHRISTIAN 120,37 8234 38,03 05/15/2002 38,03 -
32,1360,2 HAILEY, SEAN 125,20 9852 2668 06/13/2002 55.72 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5
Slandard Payment Customers Ju123,2002 09:06am
Current Period: 07131/2002
No Delinquenl Minimum AmountDelinquenl Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Detinq 0513112002 0413012002 03131/2002 Dale Amount Msg
324032,1 HALE DEVELOPMENT. INC 83,79 57,11 26,68 07117/2002 26,68 -
324034,1 HALE DEVELOPMENT. INC, 75,10 52,37 22.73 0711712002 26.68 -
324122,1 HALE DEVELOPMENT. INC. 4781 47.79 .02 07/1712002 2668.
74,2582,1 HALE, RICK 161,24 11447 46,77 05/1612002 44.31 . none
34,1820,2 HALL. DUSTIN 23531 172,79 62.52 06117/2002 85,71.
22.0924. 1 HALL. KEVIN 14374 138,61 5,13 06124/2002 62,36 - none
4,0694,2 HALL. PAMELA & LEN 115.97 83.32 32.65 06/0312002 40,00 -
40,0234,1 HAMMOND, DONALD 117,21 8548 31,73 0612612002 42,15. none
64,0020,1 HANSEN HOMES 130,50 77.69 52,81 05129/2002 61,02-
14,3666,2 HANSEN. ROBERT & MARY SU 114,84 80.36 3448
422356.1 HARP. GREGORY 311.17 244,30 66,87 06/1912002 52.11 - none
34,3234.2 HATCH, GARY 17310 103,75 4144 27,91 0412212002 23,36 -
2,5330,2 HEBERT, DAVID & BRENDA 189,30 127,19 62,11 0512212002 106,56 "
69.0782,1 HEIBERG. JAMES & CHERYL 254,10 195,03 59.07 05124/2002 63,99 - none
3,00942 HESTER, CHRISTINE A 169.75 164.64 5.11 0712212002 50,21 -
74,03842 HESTER, LLOYD & SHERRY 222.43 166,17 56,26 06126/2002 60.00-
31,3454.2 HICKMAN. JOHN & JENNIFER 215,99 141,01 74,98 06120/2002 85,00 -
51.3580.1 HIGGINBOTHAM. RON 151,55 107.09 44.46 06/18/2002 42,00 - none
74.3110.2 HIGHT DESERT CONSTRUCTrO 195.01 115.40 37.08 38,31 4.22 0311912002 204.59 .
34.1546,1 HINE, TODD 124,08 86,05 38.03 0512112002 34.34 " none
22.0320.1 HITESMAN. DOLPH & EILEEN 235.25 143,39 58.40 3346 06/1812002 55,00 - none
3.0268.1 HOBDEY, BRIAN 75.55 65.93 9,62 07101/2002 30,00 - none
460356,1 HOLDRIDGE, JOANNE 138,06 97.29 40.77 0512312002 73,88 - none
5,0722,1 HOLLEY. DAVID 243,11 190.02 53.09 06/19/2002 47,76. none
32.1456,1 HOLLINGSHEAD, BRETT 146.22 103,94 42.28 06118/2002 40,00 - none
3343461 HOLLOWAY, PAIGE 264.19 22722 36,97 06/18/2002 60,00 - none
2,0976,3 HOLMES, LAWRENCE 145.31 87.74 48,17 9.40 06/19/2002 30,00 -
51.4250,1 HOME PRO PLUMBING 344.57 108,19 118.19 118.19 0212712002 216.38 - none
32,0482,1 HORTON, EVERETT 280,05 219.18 60.87 0610312002 51.03 - none
31.3606.3 HORTON. ROBERT 164,71 109,99 54,72 05120/2002 47,00 -
408102 HOUST, DALE & JANICE 152.55 110,55 42.00 0510912002 36,31 -
1.0420,1 HOWARD, TREVIS 142,67 53,75 24,51 24,51 39,90 09/2612001 200,00 " none
22,0174,3 HOWELL, OLAN JR & DEBORA 11534 71,31 44.03 06/1712002 32,96 -
34.0388,1 HOWORTH, CHARLES & GAIL 210,35 162.34 48,01 06/1312002 40,63 - none
50.1012,1 HUD 72.33 44.03 26,68 1.62 10123/2000 62.49 - none
72.0118,1 HUDlGOLDEN FEATHER ATTN 63,11 4,85 29.13 29.13 04/10/2002 47,39 - none
422028,3 HUFFMAN, MICHAEL & MARSH 258 91 153.43 39.40 39.40 26,68
31,3072,1 HULSIZER, KEN 146,11 107.34 40,77 06/18/2002 46,92 - none
15,0048,3 HUNTER. PAUL 143.78 103.10 40,68 06/1912002 55.00.
21.2128,1 HURST, JERRY & DANETTE 182,63 126,69 55,94 05114/2002 59,63 - none
32,0648,1 HUTTON. DAVID 201,88 163,57 36,31 06/1712002 4815 - none
4911481 IDAHO HEATING AND AIR 59420 435,36 15884 06/1912002 9741 "
482840 1 IDA-TRAN 1.99580 1.503,15 492,65 05/2912002 1,474,35 - none
332754.1 INGOE, BRADLEY 13638 85.76 50.62 06f1612002 9128 - none
50,10181 JACOBS, JOHN 12441 8065 43.56 05103/2002 43,56 - none
42,19344 JACOBSEN, FRANK 14771 11030 37.41 06/21/2002 50,00 -
504506,1 JACOBSON. BETTY B 79,30 7315 615 07/01/2002 26,68 - none
33,0366,1 JAMES COURT APTS 927 38 804 95 12243 07/10/2002 116,40 - none
65,0464,1 JARVIS. DANIEL 167,17 114.91 52,26 05/13/2002 106.98 - none
4,08442 JEFFREY SEMMENS 8556 5645 29,13 06/04f2002 29,13 -
3206162 JOHNSON. CONNIE JO 11654 7819 33,11 524 OS/20/2002 50,00 -
34,0390.2 JOHNSON. PETER 209,86 153,21 5665 0611912002 52,00 -
690310,1 JOHNSTON. DENISE 19901 129,96 69.05 05/1412002 65 07 - none
2015543 JOHNSTON, JAMES 39495 274,84 120.11 05/1612002 231.60.
41138,2 JONES. NATHAN & SARAH 11086 67.89 42,97 OS/23/2002 69,79 -
... in Msg column indicales no Notice is to be senl
CiTY OF MERiDiAN Delinquent Accounl List. council Page: 6
Slandard Payment Cuslomers Jul 23,2002 09,07am
Current Period: 07131/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquenl Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 0513112002 04/30/2002 03/3112002 Date Amounl Msg
22,1340,2 JONES. STEPHEN & CONNIE 171,30 133,13 38.17
32.0522,2 JUHASZ, DON C, 198.28 140,82 57,46 06/1912002 59,92 -
4,1254,2 KATES, JENNIFER 151.43 105,61 45,82 06106/2002 48,28 -
20,1260.2 KAWANO, EDITH 89,10 59,23 29,13 ,74 06104/2002 29,13 -
1.0960,4 KELLEY. LARRY & ALlNE 80.02 59,98 2004 06/03/2002 60,00 -
34,3190.1 KELLEY. SCOTT 7938 70,58 880 06/07/2002 50,00 - none
20,1942.1 KEMPER, JASON 195,26 120,87 45.26 29,13 05/17/2002 32,96 - none
42,11761 KHAMPHAY,VANASOUK 126.61 85,99 40,62 05/28/2002 40,62 - none
21,32984 KIESECKER, DARRIN 196.38 156,98 39,40
2,0426,2 KILMARTIN, E. JAMES & CARO 144,14 115,01 29,13 05/22/2002 29,13 -
50,0594,1 KINDALL, AARON & MISTIE 12925 88,76 40,49 06/17/2002 35,57 -
33,2704.2 KINDALL, DAVID 62,66 61,76 ,90 07/03/2002 30,00 -
3,0024,1 KINNEY. KIMIKO 17577 112,32 40.48 22.97 05101/2002 50,00 - none
5,0342,1 KIRBY. GREGORY & KAREN 142.79 135,36 7,43 06/2512002 45,00 - none
31.1270,2 KLINT. CARL 250,40 182,17 68,23 OS/21/2002 111,74.
34,21281 KNIGHT. JON 260.26 186,51 73.75 OS/29/2002 119,84 - none
21.0466,2 KORBER,GERALD 105.26 65,68 32.97 6,61 06/17/2002 20,00 -
50,4642,3 KUGEL, LISA 182,64 13832 44,32 06/21/2002 40,63 -
50,0720,1 LACASA LAVILLA 283,41 280,49 2,92 07/18/2002 71.21 - none
22,2398,2 LAKE, LINDA 109,69 75.21 34,48
2,6030.3 LAMBERT, MARK 82,40 55,72 26.68 OS/2412002 53,36 -
42,4056.1 LAMOREAUX, DAVID 69,22 67,34 1.88 07/1112002 10,00 - none
21,0184.4 LANDA, ISABEL 226,26 158,71 67,55 05/20/2002 41,72-
33,2770,3 LANORE, TAMRA 116,82 79,88 36,94 06/17/2002 35.71.
4,1776.1 LANSING. BUD 236.59 162,32 74,27 05122/2002 100,13 - none
2,0920,2 LAPUZZA. DARLENE 8003 53,35 26,68 06/17/2002 26,68 -
34.0784.1 LARA, RAFAEL 327.75 260,73 67,02 OS/2012002 95.63 . none
42,3000,1 LARAWAY, L CHRISTOPHER 283,48 207,33 76,15 05/31/2002 35.56 - none
50.0600,2 LAYTON. JONATHON & FELlCI 116.42 85,84 30.58 06/21/2002 40.00.
20,1986,3 LEDO. CHRISTOPHER & GLAY 208,79 148.06 60,73 0510112002 101.52-
22,0332,2 LEE. MICHELLE 174.76 126,48 48,28 05110/2002 95,21 -
20,0014,1 LEE. MICHELLE OR ROBERT 249,53 210,00 39,53 05131/2002 39,53 - none
43.0370.2 LEMAR. RICK & MELISSA 135,88 87,72 48.16 05/29/2002 72,35 -
31.3382.1 LEVITT, MONTE 152,36 111.74 40,62 06/19/2002 32,74 - none
69.0958.2 LEWIS. PAUL & BOBBI 253,21 175,68 77.53 OS/22/2002 40.63.
6,1032,1 LONG,DOUGLAS 87,29 60.01 27,28 05115/2002 63,17 -
72.0228,1 LOWERY. WILLIAM 101,62 96,56 5,06 06117/2002 36,79 - none
6.1492,2 LOWRY. ROBERT & DEBI 109.25 78,42 30,83 05/17/2002 3U5-
321320,1 LUKE, SHELLlE M. 196,27 126,12 70,15 05108/2002 74.83. none
2,4790,2 LUTZ, SHAUN & AMBER 152.58 31,73 41.73 31.73 47.39 03/2012002 50,00 -
33,2340,3 LYON, CHRIS & TAMMY 8367 76,19 7,48 06124/2002 27,00 -
2,4480,1 MADRID. JOSEPH F 14603 113.06 32,97 0511712002 65,96 - none
1.0010.5 MADSEN. CHARLES & DEBRA 12562 91 14 34,48 05/24/2002 62,39 -
50,23361 MAGNUSON, ERIC 128,36 90,47 37.89 05/06/2002 30,51 - none
35.10042 MAHALlSKO. MIKE 12211 87,19 34,92 06/26/2002 50,00 -
2,51702 MANIER. DAVID & HELEN 140,14 110,34 29,80 06106/2002 3000.
74,0394,1 MARKS. CARMEN 134,85 100,79 34.06 0610312002 26 68 - none
21,3276.4 MARLER, WENDY 178,18 141.24 36,94 05/1312002 34.48 -
74,2640,1 MARLETT, DIANA 473,93 27422 199,71 05121/2002 50,88 - none
5021761 MARTIN, JASON 14469 100,23 44,46 0610312002 78,94 - none
3.03281 MARTINEZ, ZENON & AMELIA 113-73 78,17 35.56 05/2312002 3556 - none
32.0802,1 MATHIEUS. MICHAEL 166,19 120.64 45,55 05110/2002 34.48 - none
34,2106,1 MATLOCI<. MELANIE R 193,49 122,91 42,67 2791 05/09/2002 26,98 . none
341968,2 MATTHEWS, DAVID & MICHELL 16540 128.46 36,94 05/23/2002 35,71 -
19,01861 MATTHEWS. JERRY 6336 62,99 37 05/20/2002 28,76 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account Lisl- council Page: 7
Slandard Payment Cuslomers Ju123,2002 09:08am
Current Period, 07/31/2002
No Delinquenl Minimum AmounlDelinquentBalance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/31/2002 04/30/2002 03/31/2002 Dale Amounl Msg
5002885 MAURER, LEONARD 105.77 71.29 34.48
50.4821,1 MAWS #3 - SPRINLKER 6.72 3.48 3,24 11121/2001 42,12 -
12050,1 MCBRIDE. D.B, 139.40 139.40 03/13/2001 225.87 - none
33.2266,1 MCBRIDE. KEVIN 241,72 170.29 7143 06/1712002 75,00 - none
33.2582,3 MCCALL, M DAVID 124.41 89,93 3448
69 22584 MCCANDLESS, DOUG 290,27 191,79 50.47 48,01 05/02/2002 1628 -
1,0170,2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 90,00 6087 29.13 05/14/2002 29.13 -
51,0358,2 MCFADDENS 56,84 30,16 26,68
33,1678,2 MCFALL, MICHAEL 107,73 7325 34.48
33,1608.2 MCFALL, MICHAEL 92.13 65.45 26,68
33.1610,2 MCFALL, MICHAEL 90.17 63.49 26,68
50,2192,1 MCGREGOR, JASON 99,89 70,10 29.79 OS/21/2002 70.51 - none
51 ,3246,1 MCI<AGUE, RICK 62,74 47.14 15,60 06/03/2002 90,00 - none
74,1104,8 MCKINLEY, JUNE 133,73 79.46 27,91 26,36 OS/23/2002 27.00 -
2.6270,5 MCKINLEY, JUNE 279,85 192,76 87.09 06112/2002 5197.
3.0504.4 MCKINLEY. JUNE 176,86 137,32 39,54 06/17/2002 39,54 -
33,2556,1 MCLEAN. BRANDON 89,66 88.20 1,46 0710312002 40.00 - none
20,0130,2 MCREYNOLDS, MARTY 210.14 163.36 46.78 05/15/2002 38.17 -
34.0440.6 MEACHAM, MATT 290.91 241.32 49,59 OS/22/2002 55,00 -
15.0662.2 MEEKS, DAVID & MCGUIRE, TE 118.05 79,88 38,17
1,2730,1 MELLEN, ANGELA 194,32 142.34 51,98 06119/2002 55.00 - none
4,1340,2 MENDEZ, BENJAMIN 121.24 83,07 38,17 05/07/2002 49.54 -
53,0703,1 MERIDIAN FORD 48,84 3.48 45.36 05/13/2002 199.26 - none
14.4991.1 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DIST 26.16 9,96 11.34 4,86
52,1090,1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 2,429.60 2.182,30 247.50 07/1112002 1,841 .45 - none
2.2030,1 MEYER, VIRGINIA 119,69 64,53 25.88 29.28 06/1912002 20,00 - none
31.0886.4 MEYERS. DEBORAH 161,57 127.66 33,91 06/24/2002 143.00.
42.4034,1 MEYERS, SCOTT 153,63 6.48 53,23 42,00 51,92 0411512002 30.25 - none
4,0888,1 MICHAEL CAMPBELL CONSTR 194,77 130,09 64.68 06/1412002 60,99 - none
2,2631.1 MIDTOWN SQUARE HOME ASS 733,66 610,54 123,12 12/24/2001 131,22 - none
50.38762 MILlKEN. MICHELLE 90,15 60,05 30,10 06/06/2002 83,63 -
35.0244.2 MILLER. MARK & WENDI 141.96 97.23 44,73 OS/28/2002 45,96 -
34,1964,2 MILLER, RICKEY 148.49 111.55 36,94 06/04/2002 38.17 -
51.3146,1 MILLER. S & S 73,82 43,31 30,51 05113/2002 57.19 - none
46,0886,1 MINEGAR, JOHN 100,10 68,37 3173 06125/2002 32,96 - none
34,0560,1 MOFFAT. ROBERT 96.67 67.39 29.28 06/12/2002 21.62 - none
334264,3 MOMA. MICHAEL 134,37 91.43 42,94 06/18/2002 35,56 -
3,0874,1 MONTGOMERY. PAT 152,91 81.79 34,33 36,79 04/1012002 32.47 - none
46.0222,1 MOORE. KEVIN & LISA 109.50 102.44 7,06 06/1812002 92.43 - none
32,0816,1 MOORE. RICK T, 198.42 146.95 51.41 ,06 06/18/2002 41,51-none
42.2368,2 MORRIS. PAUL 18750 146,87 40,63
32,0654.1 MORRISON, MICHAEL & BENICI 289.59 212.03 77.56 06117/2002 73,87 - none
50,07484 MORRISON, MIKE 140.63 101.23 39.40 OS/2812002 35.71 -
16,3632,2 MOSGROVE. TOM & RONNA 132.50 93,85 38,65 06/17/2002 75.00 -
2,0526,1 MOSSI. DAVID L 126.85 12685 02/20/2002 4583 . none
22,1602,2 MOUNCE. ROBERT 206.48 146,83 59,65 OS/23/2002 10547 -
34,0500.1 MOURITSEN. LAYNE 27706 217,84 59.22 06/18/2002 50,77 - none
19,6572,1 NAKAGAWA. KATHY 14050 87,09 5341 06/1712002 20,00 - none
51,3310.1 NASH, EDWARD & RUDGE. CY 4911 37,95 11,16 0710512002 35.00 - none
5.0816,1 NAVA.BENNY 201,65 161,17 40.48 OS/2212002 35,56 . none
4,1876,2 NEEDS. KATHY 177,70 116,97 45.71 15,02 05122/2002 10848 -
50,0034,1 NEWMAN, TIM 11343 85,07 26,68 1.68 OS/20/2002 35,00 - none
740664.1 NIELSON, STEVE 10017 73,49 26,68 06/14/2002 26,68 - none
32,12602 OCHOA. RAMON 10579 7108 32,97 1.74 06/11/2002 30,00 -
31,1020,1 OLDS. ROGER 144,76 138,97 5,79 07/17/2002 6000 - none
.,. in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Deli nquent Account List- council Page: 8
Standard Payment Customers Ju123,2002 09:09am
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquenl Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/3112002 04/3012002 03/31/2002 Date Amount Msg
4,0914.1 OLSEN, H DEAN 111,27 76,94 34,33 06/03/2002 35,56 - none
50,3898,1 OWEN. KEVIN 87.48 68,62 18,86 06119/2002 65,00 - none
69,0280,2 OXLEY, WALTER & LESLIE 50,79 49.91 .88 07109/2002 28.25 -
43,0376,1 PACKARD ESTATES DEVELOP 240.98 142,03 98,95 06/18/2002 1,62 -
65,0224,1 PAGET, ROOME 97.42 66,91 30,51 05/13/2002 57,19 - none
50,17702 PALMER, ELDON 503,03 252.49 125.27 125.27 06/06/2002 250.54 -
31,3280.1 PALMER. PAT 153.30 105,57 47,34 .39 06/18/2002 47.35. none
15,0043,2 PALMER. TROY 108,04 98.19 9,85 07122/2002 47.48 -
6,1241.1 PARK POINT MANAGEMENT 1,372,38 3.48 i ,368,90 1211212001 1.247.40 -
34,3260.1 PARK, YOUNG KIL & KI SOON 207,57 152.04 55.53 05/1412002 42.00 - none
312992,3 PARKER,PAUL 132.47 107,06 25.41 07/2212002 13395 -
15.0524,1 PATTEE. RICHARD & ROSIE 126,89 86,26 40.63 06/17/2002 39.40 -
4.0522,1 PEACOCK. ROBERT 96,13 67,00 29,13 05/21/2002 42,52 - none
6.15102 PETERSON, RANDY & DIANE 104,24 73,27 30.97 06104/2002 50.45 -
13,5000.2 PETROVIAK. JENNIFER 84.77 58,09 26,68 06/14/2002 26,68 -
32,0690,2 PETTERSON, KENNETH 147,27 111,84 35.43 OS/23/2002 30.51 -
42,2602,1 PFLEGER, PHILLIP 181.14 136.82 44.32 OS/23/2002 36.94 - none
6,9590.2 PIERCE, BURTON & LUCILLE 101 ,05 51,69 24.68 24.68
34,1220.1 PIPER. GLENN 76.27 49.59 26,68 OS/24/2002 26,68 - none
2,1870.1 PIPER, LARRY 132,96 102.45 30.51 06/19/2002 55,96 - none
21 .2678.1 PITMAN, DONALD 123.49 83,29 40.20 06/1812002 46,01 - none
32.1420.1 PLASTER, KURTIS & ELlZABET 127.74 88,20 39.54 06/03/2002 38.31 - none
720112.4 PLUM, GINGER & LARRY 173.70 134,90 38,80 05/06/2002 5,00.
2.40902 POND, JUSTIN & LISA 42,29 25.41 16,88 05/13/2002 50.64 -
21.1942,1 POOL. JAMES H, 25929 29,13 230.16 01/15/2002 25.00 - none
34.3262.2 PORTLOCK, JEFFREY 228,82 161.55 67,27 05/08/2002 53.36 -
2,0460.1 POTTER, MICHAEL & CONNIE 188.98 121,93 40,37 26,68 OS/22/2002 53,36 . none
34,3254.2 POULSEN. BRIAN 155.12 118,95 36,17 05/20/2002 30.00 -
51,0774.4 PREECE, ROBERT 67,74 35,61 32,13 0510812002 32,13 -
4,1886.2 PRESCOTT. RANDY 32,35 32.35
34,1940,2 PRESLEY, TROY & ALLISON 148,21 119.41 28,80 06104/2002 64,85-
2,0418,2 PRICE, DOUGLAS 233.49 175,06 58.43 OS/22/2002 89,20 -
51.3102.2 PRICE, REBECCA 49,12 40.41 8,71 07/01/2002 40.00 -
1,3490.3 PRIEST, DONNA 145.56 99.73 45,83 06/18/2002 55 83 -
74,3418,2 PRINDLE, SHELLY 148.59 107.63 40,96 06/21/2002 40,00.
21,1828,2 PRINTZ. DENIA 285.67 100,21 49,51 47.05 88,90 03/20/2002 62,11 -
42,1212,5 PRIOR, DON 126,39 88.22 38,17 06/21/2002 43,09 -
52,1061.1 PROPERTY GROUP LLC 101.94 88,98 12,96
33,2602,2 PRYOR, JUNE 119,94 74.23 45,71 06/17/2002 36,28 -
4,2248.2 PUCKETT. RUSSELL 274.71 210.44 64,27 06118/2002 46,78 -
14,5034,2 PUTMAN. CHERYL 79,21 52.53 2668 06/19/2002 26,68 -
1,0100,2 PYLlCAN, WOODROW A. 106,38 73,27 33,11 06/1812002 31,88 -
34,1172.1 aUARNBERG. CARL & DOROT 240,91 180,67 60,24 06/18/2002 65,63 - none
2 5670.1 RANSOM, JAMES R. 123,08 86,28 36,80 06/17/2002 31.28 - none
5,0194.1 RATZBURG. CHARLES 201.16 146,87 54,29 05/15/2002 8630 . none
2,2820 1 RAUSCH, DAVID 13272 98,25 34.47 0610612002 50,00 - none
2,2580,1 REED,DEBORAH 13470 134.19 ,51 07/1012002 30,00 - none
210118,2 REIS, DAVID 118.47 60.21 29,13 29,13 04/22/2002 29,13-
69,0992,2 REMAX CAPITAL CITY PROP M 116.51 58,25 29,13 29,13 09110/2001 59.41 -
2129181 REYES. DAVID & KAREN 23025 206.43 2382 06/19/2002 80.00 - none
33.45781 RHINEHART. DOUG & MARY 21945 186.67 32.78 06/14/2002 40,00 - none
22,1188,1 RICE, ALLEN 183,14 180.77 2,37 07/09/2002 50,32 - none
5,0720.2 RICHARDSON. HARRY & LORI 207,84 153,54 54.30 05122/2002 88,60.
33,2336,1 RICHARDSON. JAMES 108.64 96,04 1260 06/03/2002 87,83 - none
42038,1 RIESKE, LARRY 123.29 94,16 29,13 05/17/2002 81,36 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquen I Account List- council Page: 9
Standard Paymenl Customers Ju123,2002 09:10am
Currenl Period. 07/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Lasl Pml
Cusl No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05131/2002 04/30/2002 03/3112002 Date Amount Msg
34,0786,5 RILEY, MARK 157.14 143,03 14,11
1.4100.4 RINCOVER, LAWRENCE 104,30 73,10 3037 .83 0511412002 42,00 -
50,3786,2 ROBB. DONALD & MERRIE 118,30 77,67 40,63
50,0256,2 ROBBINS. ELLEN 154,66 154,13 .53 07117/2002 68,00 -
35.0155,1 ROBERT CHRISTENSEN 84.77 5809 26,68 05/23/2002 27,91.
69,0192,2 ROBERTS. KENT 139,16 97,31 4185 05115/2002 44,31 -
51,1304,1 ROBNETT CONSTRUCTION 139,16 69,24 34,96 34,96
500072.5 ROE. BILL 96.07 68,16 27,91 06/25/2002 27,91 -
74.3090,1 ROGERS. WAYNE & SUSAN 131,55 73.29 29,13 29.13 0510212002 29,13 - none
35,0105,2 ROONEY, BRUCE & PAIGE 128,97 89.43 39,54 05128/2002 42,00-
42,2404,1 ROSE, PHOEBE 211.47 166.87 44.60 05117/2002 43,20 - none
74.2708.4 ROSS. EUGENE 158.43 108.78 49.65 06/18/2002 49.65.
1 ,4430,1 ROWLEY. HELEN 104,58 62.45 42,13 05129/2002 64.26 - none
52.1643,1 ROY ENTERPRISES LLC 448.36 291,22 157,14 05/17/2002 29.16 - none
52,1644,1 ROY ENTERPRISES LLC 427,50 297,62 129.88 05/17/2002 259.76 . none
51,1318,1 R-TEC CORPORATION 169,51 87.62 81,89 OS/22/2002 92,29 - none
51.1174,1 R.TEC CORPORATION 54,12 20.36 16,88 16.88 05/15/2002 33,76 -
51,1170.1 R-TEC CORPORATION 54,12 20,36 16,88 16,88 05/15/2002 33,76 -
22,2146,2 RUEPPEL, RONALD 153,93 99.48 54.45 OS/22/2002 80.01 -
69,1076,1 RUPERT, DAVID & LAURIE 156,4 7 135,23 21.24 06/26/2002 100,00 - none
46,0620,2 RYAN. CORRIE 106,83 78,92 27.91 05107/2002 53,36 -
2,3180,1 RYAN, WALTER 184,25 146,93 37.32 06118/2002 85,00 . none
50,0090.1 SABA, VIRGINA 168,26 127,77 40.49 05/21/2002 56,59 . none
2,4350.1 SABLE, CHERYL 109,81 83.13 26,68 05/0612002 52,27 - none
74,3432,2 SAGER, LEE & NADEAN 151.28 77,96 73.32 05123/2002 53.14 -
19.7156,1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 92,75 63,47 29,28 06/18/2002 40.81.
2.0422,1 SALSTROM, RICHARD & SAND 181.78 153,87 27,91 OS/28/2002 26.68 - none
74.3244.2 SARGENT, RICHARD & TERES 92.84 74.23 18,61
16.3634,1 SAWTOOTH HOMES INC 70.71 44.03 26,68 05/20/2002 26,68 -
16,3312,1 SAWTOOTH HOMES INC, 30,31 23.63 6,48
22,1386,1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 169,83 162,53 7,30 07/02/2002 90.00 - none
74.0382,2 SCHILDHAUER, YOULANDA 198,83 143.45 55,38 05/1712002 39,39 -
34.2122,1 SCHMIDT, GLEN 232,87 193,93 38,94 06/24/2002 75.00 . none
42,3050,1 SCHOLZ, LESLIE 157,02 102,71 54,31 OS/29/2002 89,87 - none
21.1870.1 SCHOPPELREY, DOUGLAS & C 181,87 176,81 5,06 07117/2002 58,12 - none
37,3864,1 SCHRODER ENT 57,97 45,01 6,48 6,46
32,0622,4 SCHUSTER, BILL & LESLIE 321,03 129,71 191,32 07/02/2002 65,00 -
22.1636.4 SCOTT, CHUCK & TIFFANY 137.08 79.33 29,13 28,62 06/17/2002 60.00 -
65.3108.1 SCOTT. DANNY 128.52 86.68 4184 05/17/2002 41,84 - none
5,0414,3 SCOTT, EDWIN & KATHY 168,53 129,27 39.26 05/23/2002 12.60 -
69,22621 SEDILLO. JOE 414,36 300,72 112.81 ,83 06/2412002 64,00 - none
74,2718,2 SELLS, DAVID 11192 87,01 24.91 07/03/2002 24.90 -
21.2904,1 SEVIERI. MIKE 122.24 90,65 3159 06/24/2002 29.13 - none
33.2420.2 SHANE, MICHAEL 153.50 103,15 50,35 OS/2412002 45,00.
32.0970,3 SHEARER. JOE & RENEITA 286,46 169.10 62,37 54,99 04115/2002 142,52 -
74.3242,1 SHEL TROWN. ROGER 193.45 13326 60,19 06/19/2002 69,00 - none
743960 1 SHERARD. BILL 145,68 93,85 51,83 06/18/2002 41,99 . none
50,02941 SHOEMAKER, JAMISON 494,02 31122 98,78 8402 OS/28/2002 102,22 - none
50,0292,1 SHOEMAKER, TAMI 122,84 12229 ,55 06/11/2002 50,00 - none
2.2500 1 SILVA, JOSEPH 231,60 225,09 6.51 07/2212002 100,00 - none
3130282 SIMS. JERRY 191.15 164.88 26.27 06/20/2002 10000 -
34,08221 SITZLAR. RON & GAY 143,10 115,99 27,11 07108/2002 32,00 . none
31,0780,3 SMEL TZR. NEIL 90,17 63.49 26,68
21 .3010. 1 SMITH. BRYAN 114,96 85,82 29.14 OS/20/2002 3409 - none
50.0012,1 SMITH, PAUL H, 193,63 144.67 48,96 06/26/2002 35,13. none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquenl Accounl List- council Page: 10
Slandard Paymenl Customers Ju123,2002 09:10am
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquent Balance
Lasl Pml Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05/31/2002 04/30/2002 03/31/2002 Date Amounl Msg
32.4822,3 SOMAZZI. ROGER & JENNIFER 126,89 89,95 36.94
33,2646,1 SONDERMAN. MARTIN 10881 78.17 30,64 06/19/2002 50,00 - none
69,1312,2 SPANGLER, KEVIN 245,16 192.38 52,78 OS/23/2002 35,56 -
33.3752.1 SPATH. SIDNEY 14384 94,33 49,51 05/06/2002 107,79 - none
7425622 SPENCER, JAMES 17337 158.61 14.76 07/11/2002 51,91 -
560004.1 ST, LUKES REGIONAL MEDICA 5.670,08 3.05066 2,457,35 162.07 07/22/2002 2,703.78 - none
2.4520.2 STEBBINS. JODIE 169.45 125.50 43,95 06/17/2002 45,00 -
22,1048,1 STEINER, THURSTON 268,77 180,69 88,08 06/18/2002 64.71 - none
20,1316,1 STERLING SAVINGS BANK 161,76 95.62 66.14
31,1002,2 STETSON HOMES INC 15736 117,68 39,68 05/0 1/2002 149,00.
2,5490.1 STEVENS. JEFF 183.11 181,88 1.23 05/08/2002 106,72 - none
74.0048.5 STEWART. ROBERT 223,93 151.39 65.23 7.31 05/15/2002 40,00 -
21,01162 STEWART. ROBIN 100,58 60,37 40.21 05/14/2002 26.68 -
47.0036.1 STICKLEY, DANIEL 81.99 55,31 26,68 05/13/2002 26.68 - none
5,0416.1 STIEF, PATTY 270.32 195,95 74,37 06/19/2002 57,15 - none
22,1406,2 STRAIGHT. PHILLIP 190,83 178.56 12.27 06/18/2002 60.00 -
33,3564,1 STREET, ALLEN 46,19 46.19 02/13/2002 26.68 - none
69,0646,1 SUDERMAN,MARK 309.27 224.62 84.65 OS/24/2002 153.05 - none
1.2320,1 SUMMERS, JOSHUA 152.48 150,02 2.46 07102/2002 55,80 - none
511136.1 SWCR 37.24 20.36 16.88 05/20/2002 50,64 -
51.1138,1 SWCR 37,24 20.36 16.88 OS/20/2002 50.64 -
51.1142,1 SWCR 37,24 20.36 16,88 OS/20/2002 50.64 -
51.1134,1 SWCR 47,98 47,98 12/04/2000 12,96 -
51,1144,1 SWCR 37.24 20,36 16,88 OS/20/2002 50.64 -
51.1166.1 SWCR 37.24 20,36 16,88 05/20/2002 50,64 -
51,1172,1 SWCR 81,24 42.36 38,88 05/0212002 126,64 -
51,1158,1 SWCR 37.24 20.36 16,88 OS/20/2002 50,64-
51,1129,1 SWCR CORP 583.40 348.31 235,09 06/03/2002 168,67 -
42,2350,2 T ADEVIC. GEORGE 106,76 106,13 ,63 07/11/2002 45,55 -
2,3370.2 TALBOTT. BYRON 132,62 92,68 35.57 4,37 04/17/2002 130.00 -
138312,2 TANK, FREDERICK & TERESA 121,74 82,34 39.40 OS/23/2002 35.71 -
50,1020.1 TECO INVESTMENTS 11368 87,00 26,68 06/21/2002 26.68 - none
34,0432.1 TERRIQUEZ, FRANCISCO MAG 26699 186,97 80,02 05/21/2002 154,98 - none
6.13641 THOMPSON HOMES, INC. 42,64 42.27 ,37 06/11/2002 23,89 -
13.8426,2 THOMPSON, ANN 125.68 91.20 34.48
32.1558.3 THOMPSON,GARY 174.49 72.49 102.00 06/2012002 64.00 -
143518,1 THRONE. DEVIN & REBECCA 9284 79.88 6.48 8.48
31,2234,1 TILDEN. R JASON 149,71 104.44 45.27 06/06/2002 29,28 - none
69,0226,1 TIMA, KAREN 172,11 106.03 56,08 10,00 06/19/2002 56,08 - none
74,3610,3 T J INVESTMENTS 91,57 89,95 1.62
24800,1 TODD, JUDY L 116.22 77.96 29,13 9,13 07/22/2002 20,00 . none
2.22003 TODD, RICK 12291 69,55 26,68 26,68 OS/20/2002 53.36 -
5021802 TORRES, MARIA & ROBERTO 12212 82,86 39,26 OS/20/2002 68,68 -
42,2714.3 TOWNSEND, DAVE & JOYCE 105,77 7129 34.48
254090 1 TUSCANY HOMES 147,03 4403 36,68 26.68 39.64
254524,1 TUSCANY HOMES 10300 103.00
25.4026,1 TUSCANY HOMES 109.48 648 36,68 26,68 39,64
254532,1 TUSCANY HOMES 98,37 45,01 26,68 26,68 05/17/2002 3964 -
25.4052,1 TUSCANY HOMES 112,12 112.12 01/04/2002 1756 -
25.40421 TUSCANY HOMES INC, 103,00 103,00
2540681 TUSCANY HOMES INC, 104,62 1.62 103,00
25.4010,1 TUSCANY HOMES INC 103,00 103,00
34,2104,1 TYLER. HEIDI 19641 135,98 54,60 5,83 06/26/2002 50 00 - none
504522.1 UGARRIZA, SHELBY 105 93 104,71 1,22 07/16/2002 37,00 - none
690892.2 URIBEECHEVARRI. RAMON 84,60 5547 29,13 05109/2002 29,13 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- cou ncil Page: 11
Slandard Payment Customers Jul 23.2002 09: 11 am
Current Period: 07131/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Lasl Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 05131/2002 04130/2002 03/3112002 Date Amount Msg
74.2876,1 USSERY, TRACY 192.57 131,57 6100 06/18/2002 69,77 - none
2.4840.4 VALESKa, DONALD 97.25 75,93 21,32 06/1 7/2002 50,00 -
20,3221.1 VALLI BUILDERS 152,58 75.43 34.19 32,96 10.00 03/1112002 32,96 -
68,0288,1 VAN GENDEREN, RICHARD 173,29 118,58 54.71 0510712002 59.63 - none
42.2106.2 VANLEUVEN,BRENDA 281,59 215,42 66,17 06103/2002 32,96.
35.1422,1 VATRIC, ADEM & SUADA 116,20 80,63 35,57 OS/28/2002 35,57.
21.1032,1 VELADA, FEDERICO 145,65 109.11 36,54 0710112002 47,00 - none
6.1991,1 VIENNA WOODS HOA - SPRINK 29,44 22,96 6,48 07101/2002 17,82 -
4203241 VIVES. MARK 142,01 92.62 49,39 0612512002 37,41 - nOlle
50,3742,2 VNUJ<, JOHN 240,84 182,71 58,13 06117/2002 137.49 -
22,0318,1 VOORHEES. MICHAEL 136,33 92,95 40.20 3,18 OS/20/2002 60.00 - none
35.5017.2 WAGEMAN, CLINT 133.83 89.49 44,34 OS/29/2002 73.62 -
2,3962.2 WAGNER. RODNEY & DEBRA 139,17 104,69 34.48
35,3062,1 WAGNON GENERAL CONTRAC 70.71 44,03 26,68 05/17/2002 6.48-
35.3082.1 WAGNON GENERAL CONTRAC 72.67 45,99 26,68 05117/2002 6.48-
32,1306.2 WALSH. DAVID & CARA 117.90 82,34 35.56 06/18/2002 45,56 -
1,3340,1 WALSH. RON 136.52 136.52 01/1612002 29,17 - "'none
22,1734,1 WALTERS, J, SCOTT 149,04 108.27 4077 0611912002 50,77 - nOlle
50,0074,1 WARD. TYLER & VOANNA 161.49 114.93 46.56 05/0812002 75.79 - none
74.3426,1 WARDEN, CAROLYNE 177,61 127.92 49.69 06/03/2002 90.00 -
32,0444,1 WARNER, MICHAEL & CYNTHIA 217,17 197,89 19.28 07101/2002 50,00 - Ilone
34,2832,1 WASDEN. JOHN 111,29 84.61 26.68 05121/2002 93.87 - Ilolle
31.2230.1 WATTERS, TAMI 157,10 103,90 53.20 OS/23/2002 69.19 - nOlle
74,3544.2 WEBBER. ALLANA 117.60 60.55 30.37 26,68 06107/2002 53,36 -
22.1238,1 WEISS, DAVID M. 239,76 185,12 54.64 06/19/2002 45.00 - nOlle
21.1968.6 WELDIN, TAMMY 155,87 121,39 34.48 06/1012002 72.39 -
2.3150.3 WELKER, ROGER 224.98 187.29 37.69 06/1912002 50,00 -
3.9868.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENC 620.99 351,12 269,87 0711212002 170,00 -
20.3210,1 WENICK. ALLISON 5173 45.25 6.48
69,2298,1 WESEMAN, DIANE 204.98 144.68 60,30 OS/20/2002 38,16 -Ilone
37.4100,1 WEST ROCK HOMES 134.07 54.03 26,68 26,68 26,68 03127/2002 33,16 -
1,1110,2 WEST, JON I 157.15 150,58 6.57 07/11/2002 34,48 -
2.5710,1 WESTCOTT, RICHARD G 68.61 68,57 ,04 OS/28/2002 80.00 - nOlle
6,9818.1 WESTROCK HOMES 94,33 3721 16,88 23.36 16,88 03/27/2002 33,76 -
37,3384,1 WESTROCK HOMES 142.41 62,37 26,68 26.68 26,68 03/27/2002 42,24 -
35,0247,1 WESTROCK HOMES 134.07 54.03 26,68 26.68 26.68 03/27/2002 53,36 -
22,2374,1 WESTROCK HOMES INC 136,85 56.81 26,68 26.68 26,68 03/27/2002 53,36 -
6,9214,1 WESTROCK HOMES. INC. 7115 24A3 16.88 16.88 12,96
37,3810,1 WESTROCK HOMES. INC, 137.83 57,79 26,68 26,68 26.68 03/27/2002 53,36 -
22,1256,1 WHITE. JAMES & LORI 151.47 151,27 20 06117/2002 59.30 - Ilone
21,2152.2 WHITE. LEE 60.45 60,05 .40 06/18/2002 26.28 -
33.2392,1 WIDMAN, WENDY 168.87 13221 3666 OS/20/2002 59.79 - nOlle
74,3298,2 WIEDENFELD. DAVE 86,67 81,61 5,06 07/11/2002 3679 -
22,25121 WILSON, DAREN 31.29 24,81 6.48
3336621 WILSON. RANDY 116.45 79,65 36,80 06/1412002 39,26 - none
34,1954,1 WINGATE. DIANE 137,75 9485 42,90 OS/2012002 78,36 - none
740094,3 WINWOOD, RANDY & CATHY 221,28 221,10 ,18 0711612002 81,00 -
13,2072,1 WOODHOUSE. PETER 10760 7081 36,79 0511612002 109,50 - none
31.3344.1 WOODRUFF. NOEL R 24207 188,98 53,09 06119/2002 61.25 - Ilone
131196.1 WOODSIDE HOMES 50,51 44,03 6.48 05128/2002 6.48-
32,1632.1 WRIGHT, MICHAEL & SUSAN 119.76 84,05 35,71 06/18/2002 34,34 . Ilolle
4,1784,1 WURTZ. RON & SHERRIE 109.00 10517 3,83 07/0112002 41,71 - nOlle
22,0814,1 YELVERTON. MARC 6188 16,32 45,56 06/2512002 167.42 - none
50,3784,1 ZAVALA. JOSE 100.61 68,87 31,74 0610312002 11127 - none
20,1508,1 ZELLER, CORI 168,75 115.41 53.34 OS/22/2002 52 11 - none
... ill Msg column indicates no Notice is to be selll
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Del inquent Accounl List- council
Standard Payment Customers
Current Period: 07/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquenl Balance
Page: 12
Jul 23.2002 09:11 am
Cust No
Name
Balance
Non.Dellnq
05/31/2002
04/30/2002
03/31/2002
Last Pmt
Dale
Last Pmt
Amount
Msg
46.04461 ZIMMERMAN, WilLIAM
107,68
10738
,30
07/09/2002
39.40 - none
Grand Totals:
107,047,54
73,29687
28,09410
2,874.92
2,78165
Report Criteria:
Terminaled customers nol included
Cuslomer.Cusl No = {<) 9900000
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be senl
Ll..
Ll..
0
I--
:;)
J:
In
...I
<(
:;)
I--
U
<(
-'
u
z
:;)
0
u
0
I--
I--
Z
W
:s:
Ll..
Ll..
0
I--
:;)
J:
In
...I
<(
;:)
I-
U
<(
-'
u
z
:;)
0
u
0
I--
I--
Z
W
:s:
Ll..
Ll..
0
I--
;:)
J:
In
-'
<(
:;)
I--
U
<(
...J
U
Z
:;)
0
u
0 r--. M 0 r--. r--. '<l' CO r--. 0 CO '<t
I- '<t l!) 10 r--. OJ l!) N '<t CO OJ 0
I-- ~ ~ CO r--. <0 <0 <0 N 10 l!) <0
Z 'It
W
:s:
Ll..
J: Ll..
l- e.:: 0
z e.:: e.:: >- w z
0 e.:: w w >- e.:: c::l a::
~ w c::l c::l e.:: <( I-- ~ ::)
c::l ~ ::E <( ::l J: In W -' I--
0 W W :;) e.:: u ...I W W >- :=l I-- ~ 0
I-- > U z c::l e.:: e.:: >- z Z ...J t!J ll. Z
U 0 W <( W <( c.. <( :;) :=l :=l :=l W 0
0 Z Cl ..., Ll.. ::E <( ::E .., .., ..., <( In I--
July 23, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
July 23, 2002
ITEM NO.
10
REQUEST Ordinance No.
: Water and Sewer Amendments
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See Attached Ordinance
t1Jfro~ j.- ot / qb1
III -~/
&rfJ//F -
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetIngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
ORDINANCE NO. 02- q G 7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY
CODE BY EITHER ADDING OR DELETING LANGUAGE TO SECTIONS 9-1-7 B
APPLICATION FOR PERl\1IT; FEES; 9-1-19 A 1.,2. AND 4. USER CHARGE, B.1. AND
2. CHARGES FOR WATER AND INSTALLATIONS, c.1. PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE;9-
1-21 A. TERl\1INATION OF SERVICE AND B. RIGHT TO HEARING; 9-4-24 A.
MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGES; 9-4-25 A. PERl\1IT REQUIRED; FEES, AND B.
SEWER CONNECTION CHARGE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR
VALIDITY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO:
SECTION 1: Meridian City Code Section 9-1-7 B. shall be amended to read as follows:
B. Application For Permit; Fees: To obtain Municipal water service, the owner or
his agent shall make application on a special form furnished by the City. The permit application
shall be supplemented pertinent in the judgment of the City and requested by the City. A permit
and inspection fee oft'v'/cnty five dollars ($25.00) as established by resolution of the City Council
shall be paid to the City at the time the application is filed. The owner or his agent shall pay a
connection fee to the City at the time the application is filed. The amount of the connection fee
will vary depending on the equivalent residential unit (ERU) rating, or other rating established by
the City Council Engineer for the user in question. The cOlmection fee shall be seven hundred
four dollars ($704.00) for each ERU as established by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 2: Meridian City Code Section 9-1-19 A. 1.,2., and 4., and B. 1. and 2. and C. 1.
shall be amended to read as follows:
A. User Charge:
1. All owners who receive or have the right to receive the benefit oftlle
Municipal water system shall, in return for said benefit, pay monthly llser
charges as described bolo';': as established by resolution ofthe City
Council. The monthly user charge shall be based on the amount of water
used and the amount of fire and health protection provided by the
Municipal water supply system. The ovmCfS of all property v/ithin the
corporate limits, 'v,..b,ich propcliy is vv'ithin three hundred fect (300') of the
Mmlieipal watcr supply systcm shall pay a minimum monthly user charge.
The minimum monthly user eharge for all uses shall be based on one
Water/Sewer AmendmentsOrd
Page 1 of 6
equivalent residential unit (ERU) which is a single-family residence. All
other water service connections shall be prorated as to the number of
ERUs assigned to that water user by this Chapter) or as determined by the
City Engineer or the Board of Appraisers, and will be computed on an
individual basis. Any user having more than one classification of use shall
be charged for the sum of classifications.
2. The minimum monthly user chargc shall bc six dollars forty eight cents
($6.48) per ERU. Any owner ,;[hich has a total ERU rating less than one
shall pay a minimum monthly user charge for one full ERD. .-\ny o'Vv'1ler
';thieh has an ERU rating greatcr than 011C shall pay a minimum monthly
user charge that is the product of that user's ERU rating multiplied by six
dollars forty eight cents ($6.48). Monthly fixed cost charges and user
charges shall be established by resolution onhe City Council.
i.e.) /~ laundry ha'ting t\'[c1vc (12) machines would have an
equivalent connection rating of (4.00) ! (2 x .25) 4.50
and a subsequent minimum monthly user charge of (4.50) x
($6.48) - $29.16
4. Each owner will pay a monthly user fee based on the quantity of water
used and thc Schedule of\Vater Use Pee in Table III. Each owner shall
pay, as full compensation for the benefits derived from the Municipal
water supply system, the minimum monthly user fee or the monthly user
fee, ';/hichcver is greater charges as established by resolution of the City
Council. Should an owner request a City water service line to be
disconnected, for any reason, there shall be paid to the City a
disconnection fee as established by resolution of the City Council.as set by
the \Vater Superintendent with appro'/al of the City Council. The owner
must request the City to place the line back in service. There will be a
charge set by the Water Superintendent '.vith approval o[the as established
by resolution of the City Council associated with the reactivation of the
existing service line. All monthly water rates will be charged against the
property for which the City water service line is installed. The owner of
record is liable for that amount) which must be paid before the water
service is resumed. In the event an owner leaves an tmclaimed balance in
his account, that amount shall be kept for six (6) months after which time
it shall revert to the General Fund of the City. The owner of the property
scnriecd shall pay for the monthly user charge and such owner will be
billed for such monthly user charge.
B. Charges For Water And Installations:
WaterlSewerAmendmentsOrd
Page 2 of 6
1. The charges for water shall be as fo11o';;s: in all cases, the minimum
charge shall be six dollars forty eight cents ($6.48) per month. Nonresidcnt shall
bc charged the same monthly user charge established by resolution of the City
Council.
2. In case a water meter fails to register correctly the water used, the owner
shall pay for the water on the basis of the average reading of the meter for the
previous three (3) months. Water meter installation charges shall be as follows:
a. For all meters installed, the charge shall be set by the City Engineer
or Board of Appraisers. All installed meters shall be property of the
City.
b. Water hookup, 3eYCn hundred four dollars ($704.00) per unit as
established by resolution of the City Council.
C. Private Fire Service:
1. Available only on flat rate when used for fire protection only; owner to
install all lines to the City mains at their expense. All connections to be
supervised by the City and to conform to City requirements and City plumbing
codes. The flat rate fees shall be as established by resolution ofthe City Council.
Size Of Line
~
Charge Per Month
-1-lh
~
3-
4
6
~
.w
~
~
fB.:f}{}
~
ttOO
~
~
SECTION 3: Meridian City Code Section 9-1-21 A., B. 1. shall be amended to read as follows:
A. Termination Of Service; Notice: The City eleJ:1: shall furnish each
property owner en after the first of each month a statement ofthe
amount due for water for the preceding month or up to the time that
the meter has been read and for other charges relating to the water
system; and if any owner neglects to pay his water bill by the tenth day
of the month following mailing of the billing, or shall fail or refuse to
pay the water bill in that time period, the water user's account shall be
delinquent. Owners shall be notified by regular mail of this
delinquency and if the bill is not paid in full within ten (10) days after
Water/Sewer AmendmentsOrd
Page 3 of 6
SCl\:icc mailing of this notification 5fJ: to the owner, the right to water
shall cease and terminate unless the owner or occupant requests a pre-
termination hearing. Should the owner or occupant not request a pre-
termination hearing or if an adverse decision is rendered against the
owner or occupant as a result of the pre-termination hearing, the City
may require the owner to pay the delinquent water bill attributable to
the use, plus a tcn dollar ($10.00) turn-on charge as established by
resolution of the City Council as a condition ofreceiving water service
again, and in the event the water meter must be removed, an additional
fifty dollar ($50.00) fee as established by resolution ofthe City
Council must be paid as a condition of receiving water service again.
Any owner not using water after the first of the month, or in case a
meter is used after the meter has been read, must report the same to the
City Clerk and have the water shut off, and ifhe fails to do so, the full
amount for said month must be paid. No allowance will be made for
nonuse for less than one month. All corrections as to the charge and
all abatements shall be made under the direction of the Mayor and
Council and shall be certified by the City Clerk, and all water bills
must be paid by the owner of the property upon which the same is used
and not by the tenants thereof.
B. Right To Hearing:
1. The City, in its delinquency notice to all owners, shall inform in
writing all owners of their right to a pre-termination hearing, with such
hearing to be held with the due process protection described below.
The City will not discontinue water service to any o'.mer's property
prior to a fair and impartial hearing, after timely and adequate notice
and an opportunity to confront witnesses, to personally appear with
retained counsel to be judged on facts adduced at the hearing and to
otherwise be heard and defend the claim made by the City, if a pre-
termination hearing is requested by any owner or occupant. The City
Council shall have the responsibility of holding pre-termination
hearings. The City Council shall make a record of any pre-termination
hearing. The City Council shall render its decision in writing, giving
the reasons for its determination. In decisions adverse to the owner,
the City Council will inform the water consumer of the right to appeal
the decision pursuant to the Idaho State Administrative Procedures
Act.
SECTION 4 Meridian City Code Section 9-4-24A. 1. and 2. shall be amended to read as
follows:
A. Monthly Service Charges:
WaterlSewerArnendmentsOrd
Page 4 of 6
1. The minimum sewer charge shall be clcvcn dollars scventy tIn.cc
ccnts ($11.73) per month, bascd on a usc offDur thousand (4,000)
gallons pcr month or l03S as established by resolution of the City
Council.
~ Thc chargc for usc in oxccss of four, thousand (4,000) gallons per
month shall be thc minimum amount of cIc'/cn dollars scvcnty
three ccnts ($11.73) per month, plus an additional charge of two
dollars sixty cents ($2.60) per one thousand (1,000) gallons of
water usod or portion thereof abo',re thc four thousand (4,000)
gallon minimum. (Ord. 742, 9 17 1996)
SECTION 5: Meridian City Code Section 9-4-25 A. 2., and B. 1. and 2. shall be amended to
read as follows:
A. Permit Required; Fees:
2. Permit And Inspection Fee: A permit and inspection fee shall
be paid to the City at the time the application is filed. Also, the
owner or his agent shall pay to the City, at the time the
application is filed, a connection charge in the amount as
provided for in Section 9-4-24 of this Chapter. The amount of
the permit and inspection fee shall be determincd by thc Scwer
Board of Appraisers as herein pro',ridcd as established by
resolution onhe City Council.
B. Sewer Connection Charge:
1. The owner, or his agent, of all properties cOlmecting to the
public sewer ofthe City under the terms of this Chapter shall
pay a sewer connection charge of one thousand fiye hundred
cight dollars ($1,580.00) as established by resolution of the City
Council for each equivalent connection or fraction thereof as
may be assigned to the property by the City.
2. For properties that have an existing public sewer adjacent to
their property without direct cost to the present owner or former
owners of the property, there shall be an additional connection
charge of one thousand fi';c hundred eighty dollars ($1,580.00)
as established by resolution ofthe City Council for each
equivalent connection thereof as may be assigned to the
property by the City.
Water/SewerAmendmentsOrd
Page 5 of 6
SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 7: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that
any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be
declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would
have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any
portion as may be declared invalid.
SECTION 8: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action
or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance takes effect.
SECTION 9: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect after its passage, approval and publication, according to law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
2-:5 r{! day of J' ~ ,2002.
, ~~
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 2-::;--
day of J td'j ,2002.
Attest:
';
\
No:
-
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
..--,
-
Z:\ Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 53GOM\Ordinances City l-Iall\2002 ORD\ WaterSewerRatelncreaseOrdOG 1702.doc
WaterlSewerAmendmentsOrd
Page 6 of 6
July 23,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
July 23, 2002
ITEM NO.
r'TlJo
REQUEST Resolution No.
: Water and Sewer Rate Change
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POliCE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT;
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HJGHW A Y DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See Attached Resolution
~0fj
tV 1,/
J}./ ~.~
. y~ ,
M ~ fit)
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
MaterIals presented at pUblic meellngs shall become property of fhe City of MerIdian.
RESOLUTION NO. 02- :J f3 0
BY:
~/( 1Ia/~tf
iJ
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ADOPTING
WATER AND SEWER FEES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
SECTION 1: The Schedule of Water and Sewer Fees, which is attached hereto as
Schedule 1, is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the new charges pertaining
to the Public Works water and sewer users, shall be July 1,2002.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 23 t:.f- day of
dvJV/ ,2002.
(/
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this '23,4- day of
"TJr.-.L t-J.- , 2002.
(j
ATTEST:
Resolution Adopting Water and Sewer Fees
Page 1 of2
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates
WATER FEES
Water Administrative Fee
Water Use Fee (per
1,000 gallons)
Water Turn-On Charge
Water SelVice Excavation Pennit 9-1-7B
(Residential)
Water SelVice Excavation Permit 9-1-7B
(Commercial)
$30.00 flat fee plus
3% of 0-20,000 of value plus
2% of 20,000-100,000 of value plus
1 % of 100,000-200,000 of value plus
.5% of 200,000 and up
Water SelVice Connection or Hookup Fee
(per ERU)
Water SelVice Disconnection Fee
Private Fire SelVice 9-1-19 C.
Size of Line MontWy Charge
One and one-half inch (1.5") $3.75
Two inch (2") 7.50
Three inch (3") 10.00
Four inch (4") 15.00
Six Inch (6") 22,00
Eight inch (8") 28.00
Ten inch (10") 32.00
Water Meter Reinstallation Fee
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates - 1
$3.48
$ 0.98
$30.00
$38.00
$704.00
N/C
$50.00
SEWER FEES
Sewer Administrative Fee
Sewer U se Fee (per
1,000 gallons)
Sewer Service Excavation Pennit 9-4~25 A.2
(Residential)
Sewer Service Excavation Pennit
(Commercial)
$30.00 flat fee plus
3% of 0-20,000 of value plus
2% of 20,000-100,000 of value plus
1% of 100,000-200,000 of value plus
.5% of 200,000 and up
Sewer Connection Hookup Fee 9-4-25 B. L
(per ERU)
Additional Sewer Connection Hookup Fee 9-4-25 B.2
(per ERU)
COMBINED WATER & SEWER FEES
Combined Water & Sewer Excavation Pennit
(Residential)
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates - 2
$ 4.07
$ 2.78
$38.00
$1580.00
$1580.00
$50.00
CERTIFICA TE OF CLERK
OF
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify:
L That I am the duly appointed and eJected Clerk of the City of Meridian, a duly
incorporated City operating under the laws of the State ofIdaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho,
Meridian, Idaho.
2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custodian of its records and minutes and do
hereby certify that on the day of ,2002, the following action has been taken
and authorized.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CfTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ADOPTING WATER
AND SEWER FEES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE fT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
SECTION 1:
is hereby adopted.
The Schedule of Water and Sewer Fees, which is attached hereto as Schedule 1,
SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the new charges pertaining to the
Public Works water and sewer users, shalt be July 1,2002.
William G. Berg, Jr.
STATE OF IDAHO, )
: ss:
County of Ada. )
On this day of , 2002, before me,
, a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG. JR.,
known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho, that executed the said
instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalfofthe City of Meridian.
(SEAL)
Notary Public for Idaho
Residence:
Commission Expires:
Z:\ W ork\M\Meridiun\Mcridiun I 5360M\Rcsolutions City H a1l12002\CER T ofCLKRESOLUAdoptingW uterSewerFces061 702.doc
CERTIFICA TE OF CLERK ADOPTING WATER
AND SEWER FEES
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates
WATER FEES
Water Administrative Fee
Water Use Fee (per
1,000 gallons)
Water Turn-On Charge
Water Service Excavation Permit 9-1-7B
(Residential)
Water Service Excavation Permit 9-1-7B
(Commercial)
$30.00 flat fee plus
3% of 0-20,000 of value plus
2% of 20,000-100,000 of value plus
1 % of 100,000-200,000 of value plus
.5% of 200,000 and up
Water Service Connection or Hookup Fee
(per ERU)
Water Service Disconnection Fee
Private Fire Service 9-1-19 C.
Size of Line Monthly Charge
One and one-half inch (1.5") $3.75
Two inch (2") 7.50
Three inch (3") 10.00
Four inch (4") 15.00
Six Inch (6") 22.00
Eight inch (8") 28.00
Ten inch (10") 32.00
Water Meter Reinstallation Fee
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates - 1
$3.48
$ 0.98
$30.00
$38.00
$704.00
N/C
$50.00
SEWER FEES
Sewer Administrative Fee
Sewer Use Fee (per
1,000 gallons)
Sewer Service Excavation Permit 9-4-25 A.2
(Residential)
Sewer Service Excavation Permit
(Commercial)
$30.00 flat fee plus
3% of 0-20,000 of value plus
2% of 20,000-100,000 of value plus
1% of 100,000-200,000 of value plus
.5% of 200,000 and up
Sewer Connection Hookup Fee 9-4-25 Rl.
(per ERU)
Additional Sewer Connection Hookup Fee 9-4-25 B.2
(per ERU)
COMBINED WATER & SEWER FEES
Combined Water & Sewer Excavation Permit
(Residential)
Schedule 1 to Resolution adopting Water and Sewer Rates - 2
$4.07
$ 2.78
$38.00
$1580.00
$1580.00
$50.00
(
\
ACHD'S REASON FOR BEING
As an automaker's ad campaign of recent years pointed out, wider is better. In the
case of the Ada County Highway District, "wider" meant countywide - a reform adopted
by voters in 1971 to do away with a patchwork quilt of city and county highway
departments, Depending on where they lived before ACHD's establishment, county
residents faced widely uneven service, a bloated tax burden and poor overall road
planning.
ACHD's structure - a single-mission highway district spanning an entire county -
allows it to focus on a primary mission: the safe and efficient movement of traffic
throughout Ada County. The District can do this more efficiently and at a lower tax
burden compared to the predecessor agencies. ACHD's creation also remedied a problem
of many city residents being double taxed for the privilege of driving on inferior roads
close to their homes. Although they paid county road taxes, many city residents
complained that their money unfairly improved rural county roads.
The pooling of resources made possible by the creation of the District has
allowed it to take on large projects, some of them award-winning efforts, such as the
West ParkCenter Bridge, the Connector from River Street to Broadway, Curtis Road, the
Fairview A venuelMilwaukee Street intersection and many more. All of these projects
required planning, scoping and funding that might have been impossible for even the
largest municipal governments. And because the Di~._: _.'
countywide, the projects go where they make the 010
at city limits.
~:;w S-}<~
7-23-02-
~ppmg
ACHD is efficient. For the proposed 2002-20
costs are expected to be slightly below 25 percent of 1
favorably against other agencies responsible for road\
government.
mel
npares
The District manages taxpayer money well, ensuring that tax dollars become
pavement, bridges and other improvements, or are spent on maintenance projects that
benefit the public. In 2001, ACHD spent 99 percent of its operational budget and 97
percent of its capital budget - percentages that compare favorably to any government
agency or private firm.
More than half of ACHD's budget (53.9 percent) goes toward capital projects,
such as the Fairview A venuelMilwaukee Street intersection reconstruction. Nearly 21
percent is earmarked for maintenance, such as road repair and snow removal.
Administration consumes just 4.6 percent of the current-year budget.
The District has enjoyed success in capturing millions of dollars in federal
transportation funds that are up for statewide competition. Nearly every year for the past
decade, ACHD has received money that became available because other agencies could
not propose and commit to projects quickly enough LO prevail. Examples of this success
include the resurfacing of Bogus Basin Road, dozens of commuter vans, several road
resurfacing projects and funding for major transponation studies.
Earlier this month, Boise Parks and Recreation officials concluded they could not
take over the maintenance of the North 81h Street Extension, which they estimated could
cost the city up to $60,000 a year. ACHD maintains the road for less than $30,000 a year,
realizing the benefits of a well-trained staff and multi-use equipment fleet.
Because a single agency oversees the roads, an Ada County motorist experiences
no change when driving between cities or into the county because the roadway planning,
construction, signing, striping and maintenance are consistent. ACHD oversees all 322
signalized intersections within the county, monitoring more than half of those through its
Traffic Management Center. Each day, technicians in the center minimize disruptions for
the public by monitoring the flow of traffic around incidents via surveillance cameras,
dispatching emergency crews where necessary and adjusting signals to ease congestion.
Even the Idaho Transportation Department's state road signals and freeway message
signs are operated by ACHD in an arrangement that cuts duplication and maximizes
efficiency.
ACHD succeeded in building Curtis Road when previous efforts by the city and
county fell short of creating this critical link oIl the Boise Bench. Ultimately, the District
drew criticism for having to almost immediately expand the road from three to five lanes,
but the expansion added only 3 percent to the project's cost because of farsighted
planning, which made the expansion quick and easy because the needed right-of-way and
facilities were in place. (Note: The decision to initially build a three-lane road was a
political compromise between ACHD, Boise and the neighborhood, which allowed the
project to move ahead and avoid past pill'alls.)
The District performs an aggressive maintenance program that results in the best
local road system in Idaho. It's hard to find a pothole on local (read: not federal or state)
roads and streets. All neighborhood streets receive a chipseal treatment on a nine-year
cycle, which extends the life of the pavement. ACHD crews are proactive in winter-
applying anti-icing treatments before storms, sanding when the snow builds up and
plowing when needed to get the motoring public where it needs to go. Those who
remember the county in the 1960s appreciate the difference.
ACHD runs the CommUleride Division, which promotes alternative transportation
through car- and vanpooling, and which oversees successful transit programs such as the
Treasure Valley Metro. Last year, the COlllllluteride facilitated nearly 1,100 carpool
matches, and its fleet of vans drew more than 300 people out of their cars each day. The
program prevented more than 8.5 million kilograms of air pollution in 2001, helping to
maintain the county's air quality. About 15,000 riders used the Treasure Valley Metro, a
commuter shuttle connecting the communities of Nampa, Meridian and Boise,
administered by Commuteride.
The fallout from dissolving the ACHD is largely unknown, but major disruption of
current and near-term projects is a given, Here's a list of those likely to be impacted.
Affected Current Proiects
. MainIWaltman/Centrallntersection
· Star Road, SH44 to Floating Feather
· Overland Road, Meridian to Eagle
· Adams Street, Kent to Veterans Memorial Parkway
· Franklin, Main to Touch mark
. East ParkCenter Bridge
. Maple Grove, Franklin to Fairview
. Cole Road, Victory to Spectrum
. Vista Medians
· Neighborhood Enhancement Projects
· Miscellaneous Bridges
Some Examples of Affected Future Proiects
· Three Cities River Crossing
. Locust Grove Overpass
. Maple Grove Extension
. Fairview/Cole Intersection
. Five Mile, Franklin to Fairview
. Floating Feather, Edgewood to Eagle
. Franklin, Touchmark to Five Mile
. Maple Grove, Franklin to Fairview
. Orchard, Cloverdale to Five Mile
. 361h/Hill/Catapla Intersection
. Ten Mile, Franklin to Ustick
. Overland, Meridian Intersection
. ITS projects - various
ACHD's Top Tenffwentv Past Proiects
· Veterans Memorial Parkway - 1986
· Connector, River Street to Broadway - 1992
· Vista/Capitol Intersection/Railroad Overpass - 1986
. Cherry Lane, Linder to Black Cat - 1995
· Franklin Road, Liner to Meridian - 1999
. ParkCenter Boulevard - 1987
· Gary Lane, State to Hi II - 1993
. Americana Bridge - 1994
. Boise Street, Linder to Ten Mile and Ten Mile, 4th to Boise - 2001
. 112 critical bridges rehabilitated/replaced - 1991-2001
. Eagle Road, Bypass to Floating Feather - 1998
. Floating Feather, Ball <lntyne to Eagle - 1996
. 361h Street, Anderson to Shasta - 1996
. Hill Road, Gary to SH55 - 2000
· CurtislUstick Extension - 200 I
. MilwaukeelFairview Intersection - 2002
. West ParkCenter Bridge - 200 I
. Fi ve Mile, Victory to Overland - 1997
. Victory Road, Five Mile to Cole - 1992
. Franklin Road, Benjamin to Five Mile - 1995
** TX CONF I RI ,ON REPORT **
AS OF AUG 15 ~d 10:12 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
15 08/15 10:11 2088467366
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 00'40" 002 131 OK
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Revised
~2
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI~call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd _ K _ Bill Nary
:=x= Cherie McCandless =z= Keith Bird
~ Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption ofthe Agenda: d..dd-. /~ LIfo Ii
3. Consent Agenda:
[i- A.
B.
Tabled from April 23, 2.002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
a~:J .,4 j?rel'~ ,c/,t: {c/..{ ~ tZf/Jl"dVa..e
Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives: aJ1rn1V>e-
Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park: ~vv---
Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park: Wn> V-e--'
Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park: a-rr ~
c.
D.
E.
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position: ~~~
B. Finance Department - Stacy Ki'chenmann:
1. Finance Report: fJrreUh.hd..
2. Grant Research Results: ;me~
Meridian City Cuono,' ^&loda-Iuly 23, 2Q0l. \>'e< I "r2
Nt ",alo,i.l., pr=nl<d 81 flabli. m..,ru,gs shIllI bcooIno proJlC>tY oflh. City otMesidinn,
Anyone desiring o=mrnodlltiQR fur di<...bUi~ Rhlltld IQ docuntcnL. andlDr~
pl""-,,, <<>"uot lI\c' City Clerk's Office a( 88&-4433 at l(:aSt 48 hoots pnor to lbe p.blje. mcc1ing.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Revised
~2
~~-c ~o~t- -f;( ~kbLc 'flo-b'(z -Thaft{{t~!
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Rollwcall Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01wOO
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
B. Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives:
c. Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park:
D. Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park:
E. Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park:
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position:
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report:
2. Grant Research Results:
Meridian City Council Agenda -July 23, 2002 Page 1 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please conlact Ihe City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
C. Public Works Department - Brad Watson:
1. Wastewater Facility Plan Update and \N\NTP Build-out Pre-
design, Agreement for Professional Services:
2. Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees:
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. Discussion of Approval of Tentative Budget:
7. Discussion of Proposed Exchange of Surplus Property -- Former Fire
Station on Meridian Road for Other Property and Cash:
8. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
9.
Resolution No.
Changes:
: for Water and Sewer Rate
10.
Ordinance No.
Amendments:
for Water and Sewer
11. Executive Session per Idaho Code ~67-2345 (1)(b) and (1)(f):
Meridian City Council Agenda - July 23, 2002 Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documenls and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF JUL 23 '02 10:20 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDl:I STATUS
02 07/23 09:45 PUBLIC WORKS UF--S 00' 22" 002 105 OK
03 07/23 09:46 2088881193 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
04 07/23 09:47 8841159 EC--S 00'33" 002 105 OK
05 07/23 09:48 2088840744 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
06 07/23 09:49 2088845077 EC--S 00'33" 002 105 OK
07 07/23 09:51 208 898 5501 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
08 07/23 09:51 LIBRARY EC--S 00'36" 002 105 OK
09 07/23 09:53 2083776449 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
10 07/23 09:54 208 388 6924 EC--S 00'36" 002 105 OK
11 07/23 09:55 888 6854 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
12 07/23 09:56 2083757154 EC--S 00' 32" 002 105 OK
13 07/23 09:57 8950390 EC--S 00' 32" 002 105 OK
14 07/23 09:58 Laurel EC--S 00'33" 002 105 OK
15 07/23 09:59 208 387 6393 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
16 07/23 10:00 ADA CTY DEVELMT G3--S 01'08" 002 105 OK
17 07/23 10:02 CHERRY LANE EC--S 00' 36" 002 105 OK
18 07/23 10:03 POST OFFICE EC--S 00'48" 002 105 OK
19 07/23 10:05 208 888 1983 G3--S 00'46" 002 105 OK
20 07/23 10:06 Walter R Johnson EC--S 00'33" 002 105 OK
21 07/23 10:07 208 467 9562 EC--S 00'35" 002 105 OK
22 07/23 10:08 208 888 6700 EC--S 00'32" 002 105 OK
24 07/23 10:12 3810160 EC--S 00' 49" 002 105 OK
25 07/23 10:20 CHERIE MCCANDLES ----S 00' 00" 000 105 BUSY
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Revised
~2002
~w~ l>o~-t .f;( lIk-loL:c. r7JJ-b-~ -Lh0K2!:t;;!
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Tuesday, July 23t 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Waft Morrow:
** TX CONFlf . ION REPORT **
AS OF JUL 23 '0~ ~:27 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
24
25
25
27
28
29
30
31'
32
DATE TIME TO;FROM
07;2323:173810150
07;23 23:18 PUBLIC WORKS
07;2323:192088881193
07;23 23:20 8841159
07;23 23:21 2088840744
07;23 23:23 208 898 5501
07;23 23:24 LIBRARY
07;23 23:26 92083775449
07;23 23:27 208 388 5924
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
MODE
EC--S
UF--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
MIWSEC PGS
00'53" 002
00'23" 002
GG'34" G02
G0'35" 0G2
G0'34" 0G2
00' 33" GG2
00'41" 002
00'34" 002
GG'4G" 002
CMDt:1
131
131
131
131
131
131
131
131
131
-----------------~------------------------------------------------------------~-------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Revised
~-
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Ween:! ~ Bill Nary
=::.z:: Cherie McCandless =z=:: Keith Bird
-A.... Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda: ,,-dd.;~ p 10.4
3. Consent Agenda:
t)- A.
Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
t.:(~:J .h ~rej/a-v ,&/;: (ol-t ~ ~f'NVa...(,
Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives: LZ~V'4
Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park: ~vv---
Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park: "f'I'nJ V_
Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park: arr V'-L/
B.
C.
D.
E.
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1. Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position: ttlfPYbll~
B. Finance Department- Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report: jJ~.Hhhd..
2. Grant Research Results: r~
M<ri<!ic.llCll}'Cc""",IJlS..<la-1uIy23,20DZ Poe.1 nf2
NI 'M,.,i.l~ rr="lI;d 8t p.blit ml%bngs $Mil booorno p10ptny oflll. City otM'eri<li...
Anyooe desifi!l8.oc<>mmodation for dl..biIitito related,o docIlmtlltolU>dlo, h~
pi""", 00',,"'" o..Cily Ci<d:'.OIl'io.., 1188-1433 llI: 1=48 hoo", pOOr 10 Ihe pUblle m<:<ti.g,
** TX CONf .nON REPORT ** AS OF JUL 23 ' 02. 33 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO...PROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDlI STATUS
01 07/23 23:28 888 6854 EC--S 00'34" 002 131 OK
02 07/23 23:29 2083757154 EC--S 00'33" 002 131 OK
03 07/23 23:30 8950390 EC--S 00'33" ee2 131 OK
04 07/23 23:31 208 387 6393 EC--S e0'34" 002 131 OK
e5 07/23 23:32 ADA CTY DEVELMT G3--S 01 '139" 002 131 OK
06 07/23 23;34 CHERRY LANE EC--S 00'41" 002 131 OK
07 07/23 23;35 POST OFFICE EC--S 00'53" 002 131 OK
08 07/23 23=36 208888 1983 G3--S 00'49" 002 131 OK
09 07/23 23=38 Walter R Johnson EC--S 00'34" 1302 131 OK
113 07/23 23;39 208 467 9562 EC--S 00'41" 002 131 OK
11 07/23 23:40 208 888 6700 EC--S 00'33" e02 131 OK
12 07/23 23:53 POLICE DEPT ----5 00'00" eoo 131 8U5Y
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
-------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Revised
~.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 23, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd ~_n Bill Nary
=x= Cherie McCandless =:x:::: Keith Bird
--A..- Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda: 4-dd.. ff.&,- N 10/1
3. Consent Agenda:
5'- A.
B.
Tabled from April 23, 2002: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-00
Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
<<~J .Jr:, ~,..ef1a-..v .;:/"c -( 0'1.( rn.- d<f1jJ/~
Water Account Management - Delinquency Notice and Billing
Directives: 4'~l"'4.
Change Order No.1 for Chateau Park: ~vv--
Change Order No.4 for Meridian Settler's Park: '?!)"l) V-o?-'
Change Order No.5 for Meridian Settler's Park: arr~
C.
D.
E.
4. Department Reports:
A. Mayor:
1 . Discussion of Code Enforcement and Possible New Position: ~V'o{...
B. Finance Department - Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report: I'rrt ~d..
2. Grant Research Results: ;me~
Morldio.oCioyC"'''''11AS...da-JUIy23,20!l2 he. I nr2
NI matori.l. r=n1<d at public ..~sh.lll bGooI>1.propcny o!u.c Cky ofMetidj.n.
Anyo.. dcsiriog oocomm<><lmion IQr <fuabiliti<. rclatfld Ie OOcumenL. ..dlcr ~
r1"",<ccnnt=thc City Ckrlo:".OlSo. 01888-1433 otl=48 houl'< priurto Ill< I'\lblic",o:ting.
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCil SPECIAL BUDGET WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 16,2002
at 8:00 a.m.
City Council Chambers
1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X. Tammy de Weerd
~ Cherie ;;candless
Mayor Robert Corrie
K Bill Nary
X Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: ?!J r ve-
3. Presentation and Discussion of the City Proposed Budget:
Introduction and Revenues
Police Department
Fire Department
Planning & Zoning Department
Parks & Recreation Department
Public Works Department
Planning & Zoning Department
Human Resources
Finance
General Government
City Clerk
Meridian City Council Workshop Agenda - July 16, 2002 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting.
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
.
.~ .,.
-;t-~~. .
oUe;;dl:;~:,; .
IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-250 I
PARKS & RECREATION
(208888-3579' Fax 898.5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887.2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWecrd
William L M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold Special Workshops at City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho,
on Tuesday, July 16th, 2002 at 8:00 am and Wednesday, July 17th, 2002 at
9:30 am. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget
presentations from each specific department of the City of Meridian.
The public is welcome to attend.
DATED this 2nd day of July, 2002.
\\\\\\111 II 1I1/{1/1/ ~.. L ~ ~
\,\\\\-{ Of MElT//-"';,;, ~- /d" I'
...' :'\ VI- //
./ (} c,o?P~)'; "-<11,.- ~~ WILLIAM G. BERG, . - CITY CLERK
:: ~ ~ S
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
~ -
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDI:\N, IDAHO 83641
(~OR) R~~~.1.1~~ . l='!l'l.' t"')I1:Q) QQ'7.. -1~ 1 "': . f""i,,, rIA-r[' {'\4.f':;........ 'C...... f.....nf't.'\ nnn ~........
r ,cAse 'Post PI' p~c- '1/( 'oct -LhlM1t5/
....,
,~ At;"1
'i ',''''.... i:t<:Jli. " }l.:.;/
:t .~!~--'~i1'
P't'-;." ~-',..) :r
cM'e;idl;~~~ '\
~. IDAHO I~
,>. Y
oS-~0" /
"~J;" ~,
~~ql/it[
LHOJ
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-2501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579 . Fax 898-550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898.5500 'Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
MA YOR
Roben D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold Special Workshops at City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho,
on Tuesday, July 16th, 2002 at 8:00 am and Wednesday, July 17th, 2002 at
9:30 am. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget
presentations from each specific department of the City of Meridian.
The public is welcome to attend.
DATED this 2nd day of July, 2002.
\\\\\\\1111111111111 11.. L~ ~
",:;-{ OF M~/;"'", Jr~,- /d-' I'
" '\' ~ /..
./' (j cot\POR", h '..of1,- 'l~ WILLIAM G. BERG, . - CITY CLERK
2 ~ ~o-S
~ -
g ~
- -
- -
-
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(08) 888-4433' Fa:>.: (:!08) 887-4813 . City Clerk Office Fax (20R) RRR-4."iR . Hltm~" R,.."lIr,,/>C ~"V ('){)!n 1l1l,U!j-"
I {
** TX CONi. lTI ON REPORT ** AS OF JUL 03 '02 1 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIWSEC PGS CMNI STATUS
14 07/03 11'53 3810160 EC--S 00'31" 001 216 OK
15 07/03 11'54 PUBLIC WORKS UF--S 00'14" 001 216 OK
16 07/03 11 '54 2088881193 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
17 07/03 11'56 8841159 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
19 07/03 11'58 2088840744 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
213 07/03 11'59 21388845077 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
21 07/03 12:00 LIBRARY EC--S 00'26" 001 216 OK
22 07/03 12:01 92083776449 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
23 07/03 12:02 208 388 6924 EC--S 00'26" 001 216 OK
25 07/B3 12:04 888 6854 EC--S BB' 22" 001 216 OK
26 B7/B3 12:B5 2083757154 EC--S BB'23" 001 216 OK
27 07/03 12:06 Laurel EC--S 013'23" 001 216 OK
29 137/03 12:09 208 387 6393 EC--S elO'23" 0131 216 OK
30 07/03 12'09 ADA CTY DEUELMT G3--S 00'39" 001 216 OK
31 07/0312'11 CHERIE MCCRNDLES EC--S B0'26" 001 216 OK
32 07/0312'12 CHERRY LANE EC--S 0B'27" 001 216 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAYOR
Robon D. Corrie
?UASt 'Post /Pr f~c- '17{)h'ce - fhMlu!
"'_klit LEGAL DEPARTMENT
~:'.'.~-< f. (:l08) 286.24%' Fox 288.2501
oW; CITY OF EE.1~ _ '. PARKS'" RECREATION
~ J -- ,- . (2~~ M8.3519. F.d98-5501
eriaian l; \ PUBLIC WORKS
~. . "':~~~ f "',"'_.~",.,m
'''... .P (2~~!~~~~~I~:';~~m:m1
",.." PLANNING AND ZONING
, "" IlQS) 884-5533 ' p"" 8g~,4~$4
CITY COUNel L MEMBERS
Tommy ~.Wcerd
William L M, Nary
Cherie MeC~ndlC!s
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold Special WorkshOps at City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho,
on Tuesday, July 16th, 2002 at 8:00 am and Wednesday, July 17th, 2002 at
9:30 am. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget
presentations from each specific department of the City of Meridian,
The publiC is welcome to attend.
DATED this 2nd day of July. 2002.
33 EAST IDA1fO . MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(:,0&) 888'''433, F.. (~OS) 887-4813 . City Clerk Olliee F.. f208> 888.4218 . Human Re,ou,cc, Pox 1208\ RS4.R1'~
{
** TX CONFIRM. _ON REPORT **
(
AS OF JUL 03 '02 _~:21 PAGE_01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDII STATUS
01 07/03 12=13 POST OFFICE EC--S 00'31" 001 216 OK
02 07/03 12=14 20B BBB 1983 G3--S 00'29" 001 216 OK
03 07/03 12:15 Walter R Johnson EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
134 07/03 12:152138467 9562 EC--S 00'25" 001 216 OK
05 07/03 12:17208888 6700 EC--S 00'21" 001 216 OK
06 07/03 12:20 208 898 5501 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
07 07/03 12:21 8950390 EC--S 00'23" 001 216 OK
------------------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------
MAYOR
Ruben D. Corrie
?UClSe. 'Post fvy ~~c. '1l()Hce - LhMlu!
. """''kJ~' LEGAL DEPARTMENT
f:fr:~'Rl;.:;., Ji (20B) 288.2499. Fa. 288-2501
of;G CITY OF tE~l~t. PARKS & RliCREATJON
~ ,~ '~ (208888.3579' F~. 898.5501
... ~ ".:.~
1 , " PUBLIC WORKS
er/dl an ~ (U1Sjg9B.5S0o.F,dS7.P97
~",:D~~ ' -
;.. .p BUll.OLNG DEPARTMENT
~,.., ~ (208) 887-22ll' F.. 887-1297
.'. "'" ?LANNING ANO ZONING
, 1101 (208) 884-5533 . !,,,,, 88~-6N5A
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
T~mmy deWccrd
Willi~m L. M. N,ry
Chel'ie McC~ndlcss
Keith Bil'd
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold Special Workshops at City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho,
on Tuesday, July 16th, 2002 at 8:00 am and Wednesday, July 17th, 2002 at
9:30 am. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget
presentations from each specific department of the City of Meridian.
The public is welcome to attend.
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIA.."l. IDAHO 83642
(208) S88.4433. F~x (~OS) S87-4813 . City Clcrk Oftice F~x [208\888-4218 . Hum~n R~,oorco' F~. (20~\ R~<l.~7~,
MAYOR
Robert D. Con'ic
J".
.~.;.~O
clferldl~;i/; \.
~. IDAHO f
~~c /
'i.v-"Ptt f~ 0
~~JSINCE
" H03
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288.2499 . Fax 288-2501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579. Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fax 887. t 297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWccrd
William L M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE [S HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold Special Workshops at City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho,
on Tuesday, July 16th, 2002 at 8:00 am and Wednesday, July 17th, 2002 at
9:30 am. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget
presentations from each specific department of the City of Meridian.
The public is welcome to attend.
DATED this 2nd day of July, 2002.
,,,,,,," '"'''''''' ,I.. L ~ ~
,\"\\~I of ME/r//.'IIII Jt"~,-- /.:1" I.
" ~" ~ "...
$" c} C,o?>POR-1h ""1~ % WILLIAM G. BERG, . - CITY CLERK
g ~ ~o ~
~ -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433. Fax (208) 887.4813 . City Clerk Oftice Fax (208) 888.4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723
Proposed City of Meridian
Water and Sewer
Assessment Fee Update &
System Development Fee Proposal
I. Introduction
A. General
B. History & Status
C. Enterprise Fund Financial Planning Goals
II.
Proposed Wastewater Fees
A. Treatment
B. Collection
C. Trunk Fee
(Q) U~.',' ,0 & '1?
'- . . lj u-==,J u' u
ilL
Proposed Waler Fees
A. Assessment
8. System Development
IV. Reimbursement Agreements
A. General
B. Boise City Methods
C, Proposed Reimbursement Program
D. T ransiUon Problems
V. 20-Year Cash Flow Projections
A. General
B. Wastewater
C. Water
D. Sewer Trunk Fund
VII. Comparisons
VI. Recommendations
APPENDICES
1 Fee Summary
2 Enterprise Fund Balance
~ ke.~c::. 0..'\ e. V\o+
3A 20-Year Enterprise Fund Balancewilh Existing Fee Structure l :t~ ~
3B 2Q-Year Enterprise Fund Balance with Proposed Fee Structure C6< (e.c..., 'i
4A Sewer Trunk 20- Year CIP
4B Sewer Trunk Fund 20- Year Projection
SA SewerT runk Buildout Cost Projection & Development Fee Calculation
58 W aslewater Treatment & Collection 20- Year CIP
5C Wastewater Charge Summary
5D Treatment Cost & Depreciation History
SE Collection System (City & Developer-provided) Cost & Depreciation History
6A Water System 20- Year CIP
6B Water Fee Calculation Summary
6C Water System Cost & Depreciation History
6D Water System Development Fee Calculation
7 WWTP 20- Year Capacity Projection
8 Boise City Ordinance & Example Reimbursement Agreement
!f-Jl ,-:':0 n
!. ': ~" <::::! r--.
L~. j't..: ". :L, Ir
- l.luLr-uJ U
ii
Proposed City of Meridian
Water and Sewer
Assessment and System Development Fee Update
I. IntroducUon
A.General. This paper proposes an update to the fees traditionally called
Assessment (a.k,a. Connection, "Hook-Up' or Equity Buy-In) Fees charged to each
new connection to the municipal water or wastewater system. Also included are
proposals for new water and sewer trunk System Development Fees and a
reimbursement system to replace the Latecomer Fee system that has been used in
Meridian.
B.History and Status of Fees. The City of Meridian water and wastewater
Assessment Fees were last updated in October of 1996. Since that time significant
improvements have been made to the water and wastewater infrastructure allowing
the City to grow at an annual average of 9% or 36% total in those 6 years
(according to residential building permit data).
Current water and wastewater assessment fees are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1 ,Current Water Assessment Fees
Portion of Assessment Fee
Distribution & Supply, City- $540
constructed
Distribution, Developer-constructed $164
Total: $704
Table 2, Current Wastewater Assessment Fees
Portion of Assessment Fee
Wastewater Treatment $908
Collection, City-constructed $294
Collection, Developer -constructed $378
Total: $1580
"
r-" " r".....
~~:}J J:.. .~ r~,:~ '1?
l. LJ"-~ u._~ I }
u
1996 WWTP Capacity:
2.8 mgd
or,
26,000 population
equivalent
2002 WWTP Capacity:
Approx, 5,5 mgd
or,
55.000 poputation
equivalent
Cost to BUl7dout Existing
V\lVVTP: $10 to $15 M
Cost to Build Parallel
WlNTP: $24 M
Potential Phosphorus
Removal Capital Costs:
$4 to $6 Million
Avg Well Construction
Cost: $470.000
Avg. Well 'Density.: 1 well
per square mile
Total Water Supply
Capadty: 25 mgd
The City has construcled nearly $12 million of water and sewer improvements since 1996 to meet growth. Another
$20 to $25 million in water supply, storage and distribution and wastewater collection and treatment will be needed to
meet the forecasted 2020 population demand.
C. Enterprise Fund Financial Plannina Goals. The goals of the current enterprise fund planning are:
. Provide safe, reliable and environmentally responsible services to ratepayers with costs based on long-
term economic analysis,
. Provide adequate funds for replacement of existing facilities as they reach end of useful life.
. Provide adequate reserve for operation and maintenance,
. Provide adequate emergency funds for repairs to wafer or wastewater systems.
. Provide funds to expand and improve facilities to meet growth demand without incurring debt
. Provide adequate revenue to allow City to extend system in effort to guide growth.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cuLdoc
1
To achieve these goals, connection fees must accurately renect the expected needs of the water and wastewater
systems,
User rates, which were recenUy updated, are baSBd on a 'cash needs' revenue requirements, Revenue generated
by user fees covers operation and maintenance expenses, debt service requirements (of which there is none for
Meridian), facility replacement and repair, and administration. User fees do not fund facility expansions or extensions
for new development but will contribute towards construction projects that: 1} improve overall system Quality, 2)
improve overall system reliability or 3) meet increasingly strict federal or state regulations.
New users that consume system capacity should provide revenue to expand and extend systems, This will be
accomplished by imposing Assessment and System Development fees on new connections. In general, Assessment
Fees cover a new connection's proportionate share of the costs of the existinQ 8-inch lateral water and sewer system.
System Development Fees will provide funds to reimburse private development and the City for construction of sewer
and water trunks. .-;:~-, ----
II.
PROPOSED WASTEWATER FEES
,
.?; c;-:J
-- j [j
General. The Assessment Fee is intended to assess new connections to the system their proportionate share of
the capital costs of the existing treatment and sewer trunk system, Thelr share is based upon the replacement cost
of the system, less depreciation, divided by the overall capacity of the system. This type of fee has been charged (0
all new connections for at least the last 17 years.
A
The "System Development Fee "has not been implemented. It would serve to expand or extend the system and, in
the case of water and sewer trunk extensions by developers, provide funds for reimbursement in lieu of the
traditional Latecomer Agreements.
8, Treatment The proposed wastewater treatment assessment fee would decrease
from $907 to $736 per ERU. The reason for this decline is that the capacity of (he
system has increased and we are beginning to see some economy of scale as a
result of our capital projects. The calculation for this fee is summarized in Appendix
5C and detailed calculations are in Appendix 50,
The proposed wastewater treatment assessment fee represents a 23% decrease from
the previous fee,
C. Collection System. The proposed collection system Assessment Fee consists of two
components:
1) existing City-funded non-trunk assessment, or "buy-in", charge
2) 50% of developer provided sewer assessment, or "buy-in", charge
Projected Cost of All
Sewer, 10' and greater in
Impact Area: $29 mIllion
Number of Additional
ERU's Projected: 46,500
Additional Equivalent
Population:
121.000
Sewer Master Plan Area
Bw7dout
ERU's: 59,400
Population: 154,000
The City funded trunk "buy-in" charge is intended to collect funds from new customers, proportionate to their share of
the cost of 8-inch lines and temporaryflnterim lift stations constructed by the City. Again, the proportionate share is
baSBd on the replacement value of the facilities (less depreciation) divided by capacity. See Appendix 5C for the
calculation summary and Appendix 5E for specific calculations.
The second part of the Assessment Fee is intended to collect 50% of the replacement cost, Jess depreciation, of all
8-inch sewer constructed by private developers. Although depreciation is calculated and funded annually by user
fees, that depreciation is based on original sewer construction costs that did not, for the most part, include new
street construction. Actual, current-day replacement costs would be significantly higher since streets and potentially
h:\enlerprise\august\proposed fee update.8-S-02.cuLdoc
2
curb and gutter, sidewalks and storm water drainage facilities must be replaced, tl is estimated these non-pipe line
related costs are approximately 50% of any repair or replacement project.
The proposed wastewater Assessment Fee would increase from $1580 to $1701 per ERU. Breakdown of the
proposed assessment fee is shown in Table 3.
P
d C
w
A
S
D
/(0 r;::;..,
;.y,1 / C) J /'1
U' I ,< I 1ft
o / <; I e;:-J
uLJ ) y'
Tab e 3. ropose vs. urrent astewater ssessment & jystem evelopment Fees
Proposed I Current I
Assessment Fee Assessment Fee % ChanQe I
Treatment $736 $908 -23%
Collection, City-constructed $304 $294 35%
CoUection, Developer- $568 $378 50%
constructed
Assessment Fee Subtotal: $1608 $1580 2%
System Development Fee $815 0 .
Total Wastewater $2423 $1580 53%
Connection Fee per ERU:
The proposed collection System Development Fee (informally called a Trunk Fee) would seNe two purposes: 1)
provide reimbursement to developers, in lieu of latecomer agreements, who construct sewer trunks and interceptors
and 2) provide reimbursement for City construction of sewer trunks and interceptors (sewer greater than 8").
The System Development Fee is based on the total projected cost of constructing all remaining trunks and
interceptors (greater than 8') throughout the City of Meridian sewer master planning area (See Appendix 4C). Also
included in this fee is an added 5% to administer a proposed Sewer Trunk Fund. The System Development Fee will
allow the City to recoup costs for trunk projects in the areas in which it decides to encourage growth. It also
eliminates the Latecomer Agreements in their current form. Individual reimbursement agreements would still be
completed with each developer constructing off-site sewer trunk, but those agreements would be completed prior to
construction and subject to City approval of costs claimed.
The specific methods of the reimbursement agreements will be addressed in a later section,
Ill. PROPOSED WATER FEES
A. Assessment Fee. As with the "equity buy-in" fee for the wastewater collection system, the water Assessment Fee
consists 'Of two components:
1) existing City-funded distribution, supply and storage assessment, or "buy-in", charge
2) 50% of developer -provided distribution assessment, or "buy-lnD, charge
The proposed water Assessment Fee would increase from $704 to $1,052 per ERU. Breakdown of the proposed
assessment fee is shown in Table 4.
B.System Development Fee. The proposed System Development Fee does not exist in the current fee structure.
The water System Development Fee is intended to provide funds to the City or reimburse developers (in lieu of
latecomer agreements) for construction of 12-inch and larger water lines. This charge is based upon the standard
policy of constructing 12.inch water main in all section line roads and along all mid-section lines. One implication of
this fee structure is that no latecomer or reimbursements would be made for construction of water lines smaller than
h :\enterprise\auQust\proposed fee u pel ate. 8-5-02.cuLdoc
3
12-inch diameter unless it is an off-site extension. Table 4 above shows the proposed System Development Fee for
water. It includes a 10% program administration mark up. See Appendix 60 for detailed calculations.
T bl
P
d C
tW t A
tF
a e4. ropose vs. urren a er ssessmen ee
Proposed Current
Assessment Assessment
Fee Fee % Change
Distribution & Supply, City- $558 $540 3%
constructed
Distribution, Developer- $494 $164 201%
constructed
Assessment Fee Subtotal: $1052 $704 49%
System Development Fee $330 0 -
Total Water Connection $1382 $704 96%
Fee per ERU:
rft5) ,ro; n f2
'- ul"'.', ! /,1, Tf
lJ --'?
r'l
~ l..r r
IV. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS
A. General. Adoption of the fees proposed in this analysis would represent a substantial change from the way fees
have been developed and implemented. The most challenging change would be the replacement of !he 'latecomer
agreement' with 'reimbursement agreements.'
The total fees for a new connection to the wastewater or water system may appear significantly higher than those
existing but they are close to the amount that is currently being charged at building permit application in many cases.
Portions of the sewer and water trunk charges will be reimbursed to developers who have installed sewer trunks and
interceptors or water trunks. Currently, many building permits have latecomer fees added to the standard water and
sewer assessments. This proposed reimbursement system would simply lump those fees Latecomer-type fees in
with the overall water and wastewater System Development Fee amount.
B. Boise City Methods, Boise City provides for a trunk connection fee (BCC 8-11-03A). It is defined as:
The fee charged at time of connection... to recover the incremental over-sizing cost of trunk lines, to recover
50% of (the) cost of latera/fines, 50% of the Sewer Rating Section costs and to provide for the necessary cash
flow to fund pipeline extensions. The fee charged is based upon the estimated amount of flow generated by
th~ property being served in terms of (sing/e family dwelling equivalent).
The Boise City Code (BCC) may allow the developer to be reimbursed if:
1) the developer constructs sewer off-site which provides service to other property,
2) the gravity sewer within the developer's project is required to be larger than 8" diameter,
3) the extension includes a permanent lift station, or
4) the extension includes a temporary lift station that the City requires to be sized to accommodate other
property .
Bce 8-11-05.09 requires a written agreement with the developer, not to exceed 10 years, to provide for
reimbursement of the proportionate costs of sewer benefiting adjacent or other property, The ordinance goes on to
state that reimbursement will be in one or more of the following forms:
1) offset against assessment fees paid by developer
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-S-02.cut.doc
4
2) offset against inspection fees
3) offset against trunk connection fees paid by developer
4) reimbursement of trunk connection or assessment fees received by the City as others connect to the sewer
downstream of the original developer's property
5) same as 4) above, except property upstream,
The amount of reimbursement for off-site gravity sewer extensions is based upon "reasonable bid prices received"
and may include "reasonable engineering and easement acquisition costs approved by the City," I understand this
section to mean that Boise City individually evaluates such off-site extensions to determine the amount of
reimbursement owed the developer the same as Meridian Public Works is doing. The difference is that Boise City
may reimburse in one of the five ways listed above (methods #4 and #5 would continue to require the on-going
bookkeeping presently taking place with the latecomer agreements),
A sample agreement provided to us by John Tenson, PE, Boise Assistant City Engineer, is similar to Meridian's
latecomer agreements except that:
1) the agreement is completed prior to construction
2) reimbursement, or 'share of costs', is specifically listed
3) Boise City refunds trunk connection fees collected at the time of building permit issuance to individual
builders, on a quarterly basis, until the full reimbursement amount is paid or the term of the agreement
expires, whichever is first.
,T\]C) f:=:;'; :, ,--)
'I J I' ", ' ", '_n c:;-;:l
~~ !j '"! ~ ~.., ~ ;::J { r
v '-' '.J 'J U
Meridian's latecomers agreements also become null and void after 10 years, regardless of whether the developer
has been fully reimbursed,
The primary benefit of this type of system is that project-specific reimbursement amounts per acre or per lot do not
have to be calculated. Only the overall reimbursement amount is specific to each development. The amount
collected at buildinQ permit does not chanQe. The second benefit to the developer is that a portion of the
reimbursement comes directly from hislher own development. Consequently, it is in their best interests to ensure
their project is successful.
In Boise the developer, prior to construction, solidts bids on the sewer work and submits those costs, along with
engineering and easement acquisition costs, to the Public Works Department. The City may enter into a
reimbursement agreement with specific reimbursement percentages, depending upon size and depth of the sewer
installed by the developer, listed in the sewer ordinance. Table 5 lists Boise's and our proposed reimbursement
schedules (Meridian Public Works in italics):
T bl 5 '0 't S
P' r R' b
P
a e . n-sl e ewer Ipe Ine elm ursement ercentage
10" 12" 15' 18' 21' 24' 27' 30" 36" 42'
12'-13' 11.8 14.3 21.7 18.2 33.5 22.9 44.9 30.8 53.3 41.3 59.8 46.0 64.9 53.4 68.6 60.3 78.8 68.6 82.7 75.9
- f-- - - - f-- - f-- f--
13'.14' 17.9 26,6 37.1 47.4 55.1 61.1 65.9 69.5 79.2 83.0
14'-15' 23.9 19.4 31.4 22.9 40.6 27.0 49.9 34.1 56.9 43.8 62.5 48.1 66.9 55.0 70.3 61.4 79.6 69.3 83.2 76.3
- f-- - - f-- '--- - .--- .---
15'_16' 29.4 35.9 44.0 52.4 58.8 63.9 68.0 71.2 80.0 83.5
16'-17' 34.5 31.6 40.2 34.1 47.3 37.2 54.7 42.6 60.6 50.0 65,3 53.4 69.1 59.1 72.1 64.5 80.5 71.3 83.8 77.5
- f-- - - f-- i--- - i--- .---
17'-18' 39.2 44.1 50.4 57.0 62.3 66.6 70.2 73.0 80.9 84.1
18'-19' 43.6 34.9 47.8 37.2 53.3 40.0 59.3 44.9 64.0 51.8 68.0 55.0 71.3 60.3 73.9 65.4 81.3 71.9 84.4 77,9
;--- - - ;--- - - - - -
19'-20' 45.6 49.6 54.7 60.3 64.9 68.7 71.8 74.3 81.6 84.6
)0'-21' 47.7 37.9 51.3 40.0 56.2 42.6 61.4 47.1 65.7 53.4 69.3 56.5 72.4 61.4 74.8 66.3 81.8 72.4 84.8 78.2
/0'-22' f-- - - f-- '-- - - - -
49.6 53.0 57.6 62.5 66.6 70.0 73.0 75.3 82.1 84.9
22'-23' 51.6 40./ 54.7 42.6 58,9 44.9 63.6 49.1 67.4 55.0 70.7 57.8 73.5 62,5 75.7 67.1 82.3 73.0 85.1 78.6
h :\enterprise\august\proposed fee update,8-5-02.cuLdoc
5
3'-24' 53.4 56.4 60.3 64.7 68.3 71.4 74.1 76.2 82.6 85.3
4'-25' 55,2 57.9 61.6 65.7 69.2 72.1 74.7 76.7 82.8 85.5
5'-26 57.0 59,5 62.9 66.7 70,0 72,8 75,2 77.2 83,1 85.7
6'-27' 58.7 61.0 64.2 67,8 70.8 73.5 75.8 77.7 83.4 85,9
7'-28' 60.343.262.4 44.9 65.4 47.168,8 50.9 71.6 56.5 74.259.176.4 63.578.167.983.673.586,1 78.9
8'-29' 61.8 63.8 66,6 69.7 72.4 74.8 76,9 78.6 83.9 86.3
9'-30' 63.3 65.2 67.7 70.7 73.2 75.5 77.5 79.1 84.2 86.5
30' 64.8 66.5 68.8 71.6 74.0 76.1 79.0 79.6 84.4 86.7
Note: the proposed Meridian percentages shown in italics are based upon estimated construcb'on costs
only..
Nole that this reimbursement schedule is for on-site, over-sized, over-depth sewer only. As mentioned previously,
off-site sewer extensions are not subject to lhese percentages and reimbursement agreements are individually
prepared for each project (BCC 8-11-05.08.C.1),
The off-site reimbursement would be based on the proportionate cost of the improvements serving the developer's
property compared to the overall benefit area, A copy of Boise City's sample reimbursement agreement is
contained in Appendix 7,-,.
._~ -, .~..
._~.. ___~, J
A. Proposed Reimbursement Proqram. Key points:
. Costs for on-site, over-sized and over-depth sewer would be reimbursed to the developer at predetermined
percentages such as shown in Table 5. Reimbursements would come from System Development Fees
collected from the building permits within the developer's project and developments upstream that
eventually connect to the system.
. Costs for off-site over-sized sewer would be reimbursed to the developer in accordance with any
reimbursement agreement entered into by the City, Reimbursement amounts would be based on the costs
of the extension, less the cost of providinq 8-inch sewer, apportioned over the benefited area of the
extension.
. The City would add 5% to all wastewater System Development Fees collected for administration of the
program. Additionally, the City would retain 50% of the remaining fee amount in a separate Sewer Trunk
Fund for trunk extensions, permanent lift stations and the planning and design thereof.
. The City would add 5% to all water System Development Fees collected for administration of the program.
The City would additionally retain 25% of the remaining fee amount in a separate Water Trunk Fund as
reimbursement for extensions it has made or is making. The percentage retained is reduced as a way of
encouraging developers 10 provide water main extensions instead of the City.
. Water Trunk construction by developers will be reimbursed 100% of section-line road water line cosls,
Internal over-sizing would be reimbursed at the differential cost of providing 12-inch water line versus the
costs for 8-inch water. Costs for 10-inch water mains within subdivisions would nol be reimbursed under
this proposal.
Based upon the System Development Fees proposed and a projected 800 single family residential building permits
per year, nearly $50,000 would be generated to administer the program. This would likely afford the program one
full-time employee,
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-S-02.cuLdoc
6
B, Transition Problems. The major obstacle in converting the traditional latecomer agreement system to the proposed
Reimbursement Program is how to treat the existing latecomer agreements. Over twenty latecomer agreements
exist with an outstanding balance of approximately $1,810,000 I. The highest latecomer fee currently charged is
over $700 for reimbursement for the Ashford Greens Lift Station and related improvements. Ten agreements have a
balance of less than $25,000 with five of those under $10,000 (Finance Department, through 6/30/02).
Continuation of the eXisting system while trying to implement the proposed system would make accounting difficult
and cause confusion to the development community. Significant staff time would be required in addition to the
possibility of another person to administer the program. Potential options are:
. Continue of the existing latecomer agreements charge only the System Development Fees proposed herein
to the building permits. Continue quarterly reimbursement to the original developers with existing latecomer
agreements. Collect System Development Fees from the building permits within the developer's project and
be reimburse that developer (as opposed to the present system in which builders within the developer's
project are not charged the latecomer fee).
. Propose a 75% (or some other negotiable percentage) buyout of the outstanding balance of the existing
latecomer agreements and start over with all new developments subject to (he new system.
. Continue with the existing system only.
No reimbursement system, or combination of systems, is universally simple or equitable. In fact, simplicity and equity
are inversely proportionally; Le. the simpler the system is, the less precise it is. Conversely 1 if we attempt to very
precisely determine the exact reimbursement percentages of every development, adjust fees based on different
service areas, and tie portions of every fee charged to several different layers of development, a small department
would have to be formed to administer the program (which would drive up costs for funding it). The system in this
proposa~ is an attempt to balance fairness with simp~icity. "--
VI. 20- Year Cash Flow Projections
A General. It may appear that the enterprise fund is large and that the City can afford to build several sewer and water
trunk lines, but significant commitments must be made to keep up with both wastewater treatment and water supply
and storage capacity. To date, the City has been responsible for providing these portlons of the infrastructure while
the development community, in general, provides the collection and distribution extensions,
The 20-year cash flow projections contained in Appendices 3A and 38 include increasing contributions to a 'sinking"
fund. This fund would be buill up to provide for repair and replacement of the facilities as they reach the end of their
usefulllfe. The WWTP, put on line in 1979, has a life of 30 years. Although some of the facilities will continue to
operate beyond 2009, certain components have already become obsolete even with superb maintenance (digester
covers, clarifier mechanisms, various pumps, electrical systems).
The 20-year cash flow projections list both sinking fund and CIP fund running balances. It is important to note that
the CIP expenditures listed in the worksheet do not include replacement and repair costs.
B. Wastewater. The existing treatment facility will reach its hydraulic and spatial limit (built out) in about five years, at a
current day cost of $10 to $15 million. It will provide a peak monthly capacity of9 mgd, or a population equivalent of
about 90,000. Based on current population projecUons the exisUng buill out plant will be sufficient until around 2017
to 2020.
1 The G.LVoigt and Silverstone latecomer agreements would add over $1 million to this balance.
h:\enterprise\auQust\proposed fee update.8-5-02.GuLdoc
7
Eventually, a parallel, wrap-around treatment facility will be needed to serve the ultimate buildout population. The
land owned by the City upon which the WWTP sits will provide adequate space for the additional facility. We
estimate the additional trealment facility to serve the additional 60,000 population equivalent will cost approximately
$24 million (6mgd @ $4/gal/day treated for phased isolation ditch.nutrient removal technology, Water Pollution
Control Federation Journal, Vol, 59, No.9), This figure is in current dollars which, assuming annual infiation at 2,5%,
equates to nearly $40 million in twenty years,
The 20-year cash flow projection worksheet based on the 20-year CIP's for both water and sewer is contained in
/Appendix 3A based upon the fees proposed in this study. Obviously, substantial funds will need to be generated to
J-7 I be able to fund the future facility with little or no reliance on loans or bonds.
f\} II. Q , (}'I'
i J \? \ The cash flow projection in Appendix 38 is based upon no change, other than annual inflationary adjustments, to the
{a.. existing wastewater~~~u",,~ter fees, It is evident from the worksheet that substantial funds would have to be
borrowed (at least $8imi!U66) to construct the second treatment facility without adjustments to the fees,
C, Water. Water supply and storage facilities are placed in service incrementally. A specific amount of population
growth necessitates addition of a certain number of wells. Consequently, the Water C1P is based upon providing a
number of wells proportionate to the projected population. A few other factors determine the need for a well such as
the area of growth, which pressure zone the growth occurs in and development density, but those cannot be
determined until the development occurs,
The cash flow projections in Appendix 3 include the water supply, storage and distribution systems. It is evident that
substantial funds musl also be committed to the development of the waler system.
D, Sewer Trunk Fund. A preliminary examination of the proposed Trunk Fund was completed and is shown in Appendix
4B? SF. As mentioned Section V, Reimbursement Agreements, the proposed Trunk Fund would provide the City
with funds to design and construct sewer trunk extensions and provide reimbursement funds to developers instead of
piecemeal latecomer fee collection,
Unfortunately, it is impossible to project the amount or timing of reimbursements to developers for sewer trunks they
will install. The cash flow projection simply assumes a starting balance of $375,000. It is also assumes the City
constructs the Black Cat Lift Station and the portion of the Black Cat Trunk north of 1-84, The worksheet also
assumes beginning developer reimbursements of $100,000 per year increasing at a rate of 20% per year until the
amount of reimbursement is 50% of the annual System Development Fee revenue received,
There is significant risk to the City that it could over-commit the amount owed to developers through the accumulation
of Reimbursement Agreements. If the City enters into a multitude of Reimbursement Agreements for trunks buill
throughout the area of impact, there will not be enough revenue to cover the reimbursement obligations, That is why
this proposal and a revised ordinance to follow will require that any Reimbursement Agreement be a discretionary
option of the City and not a requirement.
Even with the proposed System Development Fee, the worksheet shows a deficit of nearly $5 million in 2007. This
assumes construction of the Black Cat Trunk in that year. Not until Y2020 would the fund come near being on the
positive side of the ledger.
VII. COMPARISONS
It is difficult to compare the fees proposed in this report with those of other municipalities because each includes
different components. The following table lists related fees for several nearby or similarly sized cities.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update,8-5-02.cuLdoc
8
!
T bl 6 C
t Oth C'U W I
a e ompansons 0 er I es- as ewa er
(2)Boise Nampa Lewiston C'DA Meridian
reatment $1,530 $455 $871 $1,422 $736
::;ollection - Assessment $1,540 (4)$1,720 $425 $965
K;ollecuon - Capital Charge or $830 $1,055 (6)$789
[system Development
Total Wastewater Fae: $3,900 $3,230 $1,296 $1,422 $2,490
Other Potential Charge (3)$500 (5)$300 Various Exlg.
Latecomers
(1) All figures based upon single family residential building permit, <8001 s.f. rot.
(2) Boise City Ordinance Section 8-11, Repealed and Replaced 12/15/98.
(3) Southwest Interceptor fee applied to one specific, albeit very large, service area.
(4) "Area Fee" of $O.215/sf up to 125' lot depth. Example based on 80' x 100' residentialloL
(5) 'Regional Lift Station, Lines and Interceptor Fee'
(6} Trunk System Development fee discussed herein.
qy fD{ /(\ rs C]~
l0 If'J iJ'..j U V
Tabl 7 C
a . ompansons 0 er I es- a sr
Lewiston Nampa C'DA Meridian
::;upply Assessment (3)$1,709 $370 $1,050 $1,052
Distribution Assessment $185
vapital Charge or System (2)$900 $330
bevelopment
Total Water Fae: $1,709 $1,455 $1,050 $1,382
~ther Potential Charge
t Oth C'ti W t
(1) All figures based upon single family residential building permit, <8001 s.f.lot, W meter.
(2)Based on standard residenuallot with 80 feet frontage.
(3)From 1998.
VIII. RECOMMENDA TrONS
The Public Works Department recommends that the fee system described in this report be adopted by the City
Council pending leaal and finance department review. Public Works also offers the following recommendations:
a) Review of this analysis by several representatives of the development community.
b) Revision to the Sewer and Water ordinances to allow implementation of the proposed fee system.
c) Establishment of separate sewer and water trunk accounts. These accounts would be used solely for trunk
sewer or water main extensions or reimbursement to developer's who install such facilities.
It should be noted that the establishment of separate trunk sewer and water main accounts would not preclude the
City from building trunk sewer or water main with other funds. The City should still be able to use funds from the
main enterprise fund to construct water or sewer facilities that increase the reliability of system, replace or repair
facilities or provide better overall service to the rate payers.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cut.doc
9
APPENDIX 1
WASTEWATER
(1 )Updated Fees
Using New Calc,
Methodolog
$ 736
$ 304
$ 568
$ 1,609
Assessment Fee
Current Fees
$ 908
$ 294
$ 378
$ 1.580
Treatment
Collection-City Projects:
Collection -Su bd's.:
Subtotal:
System Development Fee
'Collection: $
Subtotal: $
$
$
$
$
815 Total wlo
815 Sys, Dev, Fee % Increase
$ 1,609 1.8%
TOTAL FEES: $
Previous Fee:
Percent Increase:
1,580
2,424
1,580
53%
N/A
WATER
'--r'::~\ r~
lUI !C11 J.1
~. ./ U' ~ l ~I \ !~ S-;1
"_V u 6--J j r-- 1';
v {J
Assessment Fee
Current Fees
Distribution & Supply-City Projects: $
Distribution-Subd.'s: $
$
540
164
704
558
494
1,052
System Development Fee
Total wlo
330 Sys. Dev. Fee % Increase
330 $ 1,052 49%
ment Fee:
Subtotal: $
o
TOTAL FEES: $
Previous Fee:
Percent Increase:
704
1,382
704
96%
NIA
City Comparison 9f Wastewater Treatment & Collection System Fees
8/912002
FEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
Fee Summary
APPENDIX 2
Page 1 01'2
Enterprise Fund Balance
1. Replacement Cost (un-depreclated) as of 8/1/02
WVVTP $20,233,073 Water Supply/Slor. .city Conslruct~ $7,829.754
Collection System - Developer Provided $21,388,180 Distribution - Developer Provided $21.787,241
Collection System - City Constructed $7,911.768 Distribution. City Constructed $4,864,588
Subtotal: $49,533,021 $34,481,584
Operation & Maintenance Equipment
Wastewater Department $944 ,458 Water Department $1,077,644
Public Works/MUBS (50%) $0 Public Works/MUBS (50%) $0
Subtotal: $944,458 $1,077,644
TOTAL
Total Replacement Cost: $50,4n,478 $35,559,227 $86,036,706
2. Accumulated Depreciation (per Accounting Dept)
WVVTP $4,406,793 Water Supply/Stor. -City ConstructE $1,096,517
Collection System - Developer Provided $2,292,639 Distribution - Developer Provided $2,210,252
Collection System - City Constructed $1,243,129 Distribution - City Constructed $556,329
Subtotal: $7,942,560 $3,863,097
Operation & Maintenance Equipment
Sewer Department $491.370 Water Department $270.407
Public Wor1<slMUBS (50%) Public Wor1<slMUBS (50%) $0
Subtotal: $491 ,370 $270,407
Total Accumulated Depreciation: $8,433,930 $4,133,504 $12,567,434
Ace. Depr as % of Replacement Cost 17% 12% 15%
3. Determine Beginning Balance
Beginning Balance, 7/1102: $28,000,000 (estimate of cash, investments) " ,
FY '02 Projected Revenue: $10,490,000 ....,-' --
FY '02 Expense: $14,969.304 ,
Use of Fund Balance: -$4,479,304
Entprs. Funds Carry.Qver from FY '02; -$3,266,646
Projected Fund Balance FY '02: $20,254,050
4. Determine logical split between water & sewer fund balance
W.W. Assessment Fee, current: $1,580 69%
Water Assessment Fee, current: $704 31%
$2,284
W,W. Assessment Fee, pre-1996: $1,370 73%
Water Assessment1=ee, pre-1996: $500 27%
$1,870
W.W. Replacement Cost, Total: $50,477,478 59%
Water Replacement Cost, Total (estimated): $35,559,227 41%
$86,036,706
Note: since assessment fees and depreciation revenues collected through user fees for both water & wastewater have been
comingled there is no way to easily track how much of balance belongs to either department. However, wastewater seems
to have spent more on capital projects over last four years than water, Use the following ASSUMPTION:
Assume split;
W.W.: 6O.000k
W.W. Fund Balance: $12,152,430
Water: 40.00%
Water Fund Balance: $8,101,620
Summary/8l6l2OO2
Summary
brad_~oo summal)'lFEE SVMMARY.3-6-02
APPENDIX 2
Page 2 0(2
5. DetermIne fund balance required to adequately serve as sinking fund
for future replacement
Fund Balance, 10/1/99 (from above):
Wastewater
$12,152,430
Water
$8,101,620
Minimum Operating Reserve, days:
Annual Operation Expense (Pf '02):
Minimum Operating Reserve, cash:
Bond Retirement Reserve:
Minimum Capital Reserve (assume):
180
$3,330,000
$1,642.192
$0
$1.000,000
180
$2,715,000
$1,338,904
$0
$1.000,000
.", of Accumulated Depr. To E6tablish
Sinking Fund (assume):
Accumulated Depreciation:
"Beginning Value of Sinking Fund:
50%
$8,433,930
$4,216,965
50%
$4,133,504
$2,066,752
BEGINNING CIP FUND BAlANCE:
$5,293,273
$3,695.964
. Will require acceleration of depreciation collected through user fees to fully fund sinking fund
, .......'c
, .
~::.~
, .
r-::::; c;~J
" .. ,,:~ U
, '--'<
~.'
CI '-'
S<Jmmarp'lllGl2OO2
Summary
brIld_wIeoIefprlseVoo summarylFEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
~
~
~
~
~ t?;jJ
~~~
~ ~
~j
f
~-
1;
'"
!:\
Cl
Z
I1J
lL
~
88i
~~~
SS"
'p=
" ~ e
g !!!
~ 8!:1~~
,; .",-g li
~~~;:I;
~ ~ &l
"
:5
0;
.c:
15
'"
.,
.,
u.
....
t::
III
E
~
~~~
:i-O
El!"
8~e
e
-ail
g~!
o-~~
!g
~u.
~!
Q:~~
>1,,,!!
..u...
~ m
I~~@
e ~ ~
0.. Crr-
~8g~
0- u.
}l"g
~~8
e'Z;!;
o.8!
<i '"
ii(l~@
~i8;;
is ~
lLoB
rice
~~S
...u...
- al
li~g
lL c: L
~a:..
:gog~
0- u.
}leg
~~8
e'~~
0.81
}l;~
iffi~
ll8
~ Ei@
B!~~
- '"
~!~~
~c: '~
~~~~..~~~~~OO~"N~~gl~a~~~
S; ~ - M ;;; N.c;:; :E3 ~ l.:.: ..... CD ~ ~ M.: :; ~ S g 81<?' :: CS M ~
~~~~m~l~aaa~~~~~~~~*~~*~
~ '" ~~~~~"'~~~"''''~..~~~~-~
aa~~~8~M~",~~~8~~~N~-~8m~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~
g
~~i~~*~8-~8~88~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~------g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
u.
~~~~~;g~~~~~i~s~~~~~~~~S
~g~~~~~-g-P~~~~~-~~~~~;8
m~ ~~~g~~_~M.8~y~v M~
~~~~~~a~~~~;;~~~~~~~~~a~~
~~*~~~~~~~~m~~~~~8E~s~~~
mm8~~~~~~$~~~88~~~;~8~2~
~~~~a~~~~~aaa~aaaaa~~~~~
<D
~~Nmg~~8~"'''~~8N;~-8~~~'''~M
~am~a~m;;~~~~~a~~;:I;~~~..~~a~
I/}
~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~n~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~S~~~~~a~aa~mm!~m-
..
t;
~*~Si2~~~~~~~*~~~~~i
;;;; ~ ;;;;~~;; ~~~~;;~;;ai
o
W
M~~~~~~Wro~~N~~~~~~~~~NN~ r
~~~NM~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~ffi~~ 8
~~~~g~~~Sm~2~~~~~~~~~~~m u
~~~~~~1~0~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~ ~
it
~
~
-'
~
o
...
-'
-~~~~N~N~~~~a~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~
M~~~~ON~M~~~~~~~8~~~N~~m~
~-N~-"NN~~___~m~__~___~~<D
~M~K~_.~~W~~~~~ WM~~0~~~M
I/}
~2222~~i~~~~~gre~~8~~~~;~ i
;;;;~;;;;~~;;~;;;;;;;;;;;;~~f;l~~~w~~
~~~~~~~!~2~g~~S~~~~2~~~~
EaR ~~~a!~i~I~~~8aS~~a~~
6ft
N ~~ ~ ~ ~g ~
~m~8;~l!~~~.2~$~~~;--~~~
~~~~I;;~~~~~~~;;;;~-~~~;~. !
E.,
~~~E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~o ~NN~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~O~~~~~~~
:Ii:!;
tij
iE x
~j&a~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~;~~~~~~~
~~~N~re~~~;~~ ~~3~~~~2~~~~~~~2~
~w ~
~&~~~~~8-~8~88~~g~;~~~~~~~",~
~----~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
e'
~
~
5
t
~
~
u
j
!f
~
a:
~
lL
..
:i
!!
..
E
~
l!
E
fi
..
e
"
f!
@
i
i
E
f
~ i
i!
0
0
e
"
tl
.-
~
G:l
(I)
tl:I
G:l
s:- a a
._ c:;
.;:::: -
(,)~-
Q)C,)~
'_ t'O =
o'iii=-
..... G:l
a... .c (I)
~ ~,Q
;;110==
00(1)
--
u..cnt'O
.c:'S~
Cf)=c
~~tl:I
(.) :Jtl"if.
_cN
~=-
Q)':~
>- G:l ~
Q:t:ll)
N.c.e
"'C:l:&'t:
c:'O<D
u..= c:: ~
.g,C,)
Q)t;'Ci
.~ E. c:
Q.~.2
'- c:'"
Q) Q t'O
_C,),2
=~~
u.a (.) -g
C:(I)S
.~ ~ 0
ii := c::
..- CI)"Q
-CI)C:
Q)ca-
:E -'"
~
G:l
~
~
t
I
~
.. 1/
-'
~ r ~ ~
... ~ II
[ ~
~ ~
. .~ I
~ i
. 0
. i!i ~
1~ ~
~ ~ ~
{ .
J- ~ i
7 \! -- ~
1
)
It / / -r
, V -~~
-(I ..'
~ ~ ~
~ \a ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ~
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 f;fl 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0
6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 .0 6 .0 6 .0 ill 0
(") N ~ ..- ..- ~ 1fT .,-
f;fl f;fl ~ f;fl --- lit
---
a:>u-ele8 pun:! ,mol.
(/'l
Q)
Q)
...-
0 ~
('\l Q)
0 .
N ..-
't::
(J) ro
..- .c
0 0
('\l
C1:)
..-
0
('\l
r-
..-
0
N
<0 Q)
0
..- c
0 ro
C'\l co
<.0 (])
..- '0
~ C
::l
"<t u..
..- Q)
0 r/)
C'\l 'C
(") e-
..- ~
0
C'\l
('\l uJ
..- co
~ (5
I-
..- ~
..-
0
C'\l
0
..-
0
C'\l
(J)
0 Q)
0
N 0
c
C1:) ro
0 '@
~ OJ
r- '0
c
0 ::l
0 u..
C'\l
....
<0 23
0 co
0 >
('\l
ill \
0
0
C'\l
"<t
0
~
(")
0 Q)
0 0
C'\l c
N (Q
e (ij
e (])
N '0
..- C
0 ::l
e u..
N ....
e CD
0 ~
~ (/)
\
~
(V
/)~
({fl
" '::J
(.
,..:" '~.
(~))
.~..:
I'
f~ { ~ ( .;
N
o
c
~
Q
a
I~
X
/' ~
1 ~fl!b
""-~
~ \\~ ~
'(@
i
j
f
~
"
88g
SS);'
~~:
Hi
8H~
~~u
ll:l
<:
~
E
.,
~
~
"
~
"
'"
"
ii:
'"
<:
6
,
~
~
I i
~;;p t
lhl j!
H",~ p
'" '" ~ $ i is
!ill .t
~_ . & : li
"6.~u ~.t
,s.!:fI;
pO! H
dh II
) I
~~~~iii
~. ~fa
" a::ia
~
t
!
C>
.~
C>
;iJ
O/l
<::
..
1i:
~
~
[
~J
..
o
<::
=5 ..
"iiI
~'"
Hj
a~j
~~;;
~ If ~
;!
;8"
..Lg
~~A;;
J .
a~j
::!.u.~
L
... g
fJ
l;i!-
-is
i.t'f
~!ci
~ h
tfL
~ui"
'il~
Id
ll~~
In
Ill}
~~~~58;~!i8~;8~~~~;!S89~R
~~~~;~~ ~-~~ ;I~-"-a~a==
I
~
1t
f~~~S~g8-N8~1~8~~g~~~~~~~~~~~
l~~-~--~~~~~I~R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
d
.E~
-0
s{
~a;~~~a~N~~~g~~!;~8~~~~i
a~~~~~~g~~~~~W~8g~~~~g~~~,
s~~~~~~~~p~~g~ ~~~~~~n~~
~O~N _I~~ ~~CCN_nM~I~~~
.,;;;;;;;; M....;;-I:;I~~;;;;...IO::"1'-'::
~~~~~~,~~~~j;~~i~~"_N~~N~~
~~n~c~a a~~O~~~~~Q_
gi~~~~~ ~~~i~~~;i~i
I~r~ ~=aG =;__N~~~~~~
L
~ g
f!
8~N~~~I~~i!~8S~a~ g~S~~~;
i~~~~~~a iS~Z8~~~Si~5i~~
l;ll~ :i;f !:ilii :it 1t:;1t;' ftl~ :;I~ e ;;;;
~~~R~~~~;e! ~~i~~:~~~~~ig
.. .......I~.. w "'" --I;; -:; -..... .....,.::. -I;;--;;~;I;-""'::;
....
~
i!;l~~w1i!lHi"';::;;lZls:~-8::lg::; .
...: ~ ~Ie: _........ ~: ~I~ Iii ~ ~ =: ~ ~ rJ- ~
"'" I'" ... "'_... t:. of
::
..
~~~~~sa~~~~~~~~~8g~~~~~~ 8
~a~~ta;~~g~:~~~~~g:~~~~~ 0
~~oatia :::~!~I~~::C=~...~~~:~~ ~
~
~
:.i
I-
8
I
8~~5~~~i~~i~8~~8g~g~~~8~
~a~~~~s;~~S~5~;~~s~~~~~~
~~~g~~I~I~~~~~~I~~~I~~ ~g~~~~
.
~
I
~~~g~~~~g"'::l~~~~~~~~n~~~~
~~IIO......u~...._S:.....",,:aa.Q1C1i!:S~n'rJ'o8 -2
S;~8~ 81&~~~ly~ig~lggl~~~g~
'" a 1X ;( ;1;1.-.! ~ ;t ~~i'lI:1 ~ ~!~ ~ .-;I~ l3t :;;;-:.~
..
~~~~~~~~~~i~gs~~~~i~3~g~~
~~-~~~a~N~ N~W~MMl.-;-~~~~
~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~8&S~~~~~
;~~_~~~NN"~I~~~ ~ ~ ~d~ a
~S""~~hC~~~~88~~~g~~~ ~~~
e~~~DDmo~~~___T~.~S~~~~~
~~ ::I:H~.... 2~I:;bIIlI~iIP :t ~
- liIl'l "Iii ~ ~ Iii ..1~~~l:a:lI~ a t
..
I
J!
~
j
~
t
~
~
~
~
1:
~
.'l!l
li1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q
~l"NY..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~GQGmmam
~lj~
~~~8S~~;~~;~22~~~-i~~ ~~
I~ Ol :;1;' I~ %l -I.;; -1;;1. M ~I;; i
!l~ 1::; ~8 ~;;;~J:::;; l<l :t~~~:th 8~~~Ilc;;::;- ~nHl~ ""
t6~~~~~~riri~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~
~~ .
;;
iJ~~~~~~~~~~~ il~~~~;5ai~~~~il~~
1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~Z~2;N~~~~ge~~~
S g
~
~iiliRi8-S8~S8~8ge~_~~~~~~~l<l
J------l<l~~~~R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
~
-
~
c~."
'Ie;
':.)
'J
-
r--
/( "
..- ..))
-
~
=
=
....
ct-
o.c
0_ t:f)
b~
.~Ci)
2CfS
a... ol:J
~::?
o e.
i:i:.MN ,-
.c't;"ii
(1).....=
('CJ ':;:;' = --
(,,)lS~
.......-:"
mU(I)C
CDtVC%I
>- iii .fa -
Q Q)'t:.
N~C;)
~~~ct
='b~
u.. = (I) -
_ctV
C;;=~
oc U C;) -
e.=
e:'t;
CD =
_ c
C U
u.& ....
C.E.
t':l.12
~CI)
0_ c
..... t.)
CD (I)
:s~
=
C3
.5
-
-------
--
I--
-
-
\
!--
o
o
o
o
o
o.
o
~
\ \ ~
:.: . [\---- -\
l~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'> ~ -:/ .1/
,z. Cl:- 'P' ...../-
'"
4( ,/
4'
.. ~ ~
\~
~\
\
-
-
---
o
o
o.
o
o
o
o
~
~
-
~
~\
~
-
l
I
I
~
~
'"
~
~l
1~
.
~
~
~
"
,
,
...
-
,)~
(
/
,If
~
I'
~8 ~
~I~
-~ fa
J U I
"- ~
j f
~ , ~
\
o
fh
o
o
o
o.
o
o
o.
o
~
o
o.
o
o
o.
o
..,...
fh
a:>ue}-e9 pun:l ,mol.
-
l
r.fl
X
co
~
.9?
-
DC-De
6'L
DC-
/YL
Oe
<'LOe
.9LOe
SLOe
J>L
Oe
C'L
OC'
cLOC'
_ L LOe
OLOC'
_ 6'00C'
_ 6>00C'
-
Q)
o
c
co
co
[l)
-0
C
~
u..
Q)
r.fl
.c
e-
~
co
"'0
\
-
\
<'OOc
.900c
.S)
DOC'
l>.
- DoC'
_ C'OOC'
_ 2'002'
_ LOOe
_ 0002'
_ 6'6'SL
_ /Y6'SL
_1 <'6'6'L
---
o
o
o
o
o
o.
o
'<'"
~
8
o
o.
o
o
o.
~
~
8
o
o.
o
o
o.
o
c<'}
~
'-"
r.fl
'x
co
;t:::
.9?
Q) -0
(.) C
C ~
.52u..
co en
0) c
-0 -;2,
C C
? .~
u..W
'- '-
~~
~~
~ ~
II)
.~
u::::
2.
WASTEWATER TRUNK BUILOOUT COST PROJECTION
HYDRA computer model l18e5 100% saturatioo buildout
Assume actual buildout pe<centage
Estimate pefSOOslERU
70%
2,9
SeMce
Buildout
ERlfs
4634
16531
266
18.819
APPENDIX 5A
Temp LS
Est Cost.
n a licable
North Black Cat I 8.110 10401 1151 3587 $916401 $718750 $1 635151 $0
N, Slouoh I 19850 13695 2370 4791 $4 099 000 none $4 099,000
WMe Trunk. Main 15150 10605 1710 3657 $1 295 000 $1295000
WWfP to White Trunk S408 000 $406.000
WMe Trunk (laterals only) $983 750 none S983,75O
3)5. SlouQh Extension 7030 4921 902 1697 S1 276000 none $1 276000
1315 Mile 8e1enslon 3200 2240 524 772 $296 953 none $298 953
FIVe Mile Relief - Ph, 1 comDleled none $0
FIVe Mile Relief. Ph, 2 $1 161 000 none $1 161 000
I
150.505 110.078 17.623 37.958 $28,213,454 $4,715.625 $32.929,079 $0
Ten Mile Trunk 16.000 16.000 2,185 5,517
FIVe Mile Trunk 34,060 34.060 4,115 11.745
50,060 50.060 6.300 17,262
Ten Mile Trunk, extg, 14.790 2.165 5,100
Five Mile, extg, 22.330 4,115 7.700
37,120 6.300 12.600
Difference , 12.940 4,462
HYDRA Model
dout Population Projectlon: 200,665
should be approx
Actual Est
Buildaut Pop
160,138
46 sedioos
HYDRA Area
24,123 GS,220
37.7 sections
nated Addltlonal, or future:
(buildout minus exlsting)
163,445
123.016
17,823
Gross COSU Future ERU:
5%:
(1) Includes all sewer 10" ancllarger shown on master plan
(2) Incfudes pressure main costs
(3) Includes only that portion upstream Silverstone
81912002
42,420
$776.27
$38.81
$815
"(159.000/2S persons./ERU)
Page 1 of 1
WWTP w.vrP ' ,'Il'MrJn
ClIplIol Cost ~ C<><ls
('02 <101o<'o) ('02~)
wvm>
CqJ/tsI Cost
~1)
Year ~l.ooo .1000 Sl.btoIaI .I,OOJ S<::he<Uod
2000 S1.203 S 1.203 SI.203 I Dewolenn;t
$3.200 $3.200 $3.200 11JiooslEo". Clatffi..... Screen. ElectlcoJ
S140 S140 SI~O WWTP VeHcIo Gan>oo
I Slb!oIot $4 !>C3
2001 SO
$700 $700 $700 u.oor.l<:ry
I &btolat $700
2002 S500 S125 $625 $625 ~ E>o>ansIon
s.4OO $80 S480 S480 WlOulloJ
$75 S19 $94 S94 f'lanl NPW &m<lm
S200 m S250 S250 GrlI Bosln IT2
I So.b!otol: $1M9
2003 $100 $25 $125 S12S Sl1e&
S250 S250 S2S6 FodIlv Plan Rll'Aslon
S65(I $:113 $l.063 $1.089 DAFT Conslrudon
$250 $63 $313 = Cenlra10 _
$250 $0 $250 S2S6 hdltv Plan
$50 S13 = $G4 Plonl T~
SUJtotat S3 591
2004 $100 $25 $125 $131 M~
$0 $0 $0 $0 3)Chern. F't>osl>Oo<us R....,.,.". (polenlIlltV > S4rrilon cIooeo
$750 $188 $93lI $984 3 R~
$;175 $(;9 S344 s:3Ql RlerIl4
S65(I $:113 $1.063 $1.116 I i'r1mllN Clar1fierll4
S500 $125 $62S S656 I C<lntrffuoe IT2
$0 $0 $0 $0 Oe<rt1fi<alon Basln (AB-<ll; $1,7 nilon fin:led IN"""" lees
SU>toIoI, $320<<1
2005 $0 $0 I SO $0 MlsceIaneoos
$1.500 $375 I $1,875 $2,016 Bk>sclocIor Phase 2
S350 S88 I S438 $o!70 _113
I Slblotal, S2A86
2006 $450 $113 I $563 $519 FlIterll5
SlbtotuI: $619
2007 $150 S38 I $188 S211 J,Ilscelaneoos
$250 $0 I S250 $281 Fedlty Plan
S<bIot:ll: J.C92
200S S1.500 $375 I $1.875 $2.156 D1QeSler 114
Sl100tlt S2.156
2009 S100 S25 I $125 $147 Miscelaneoos
Slblolal: $147
2010 $100 S25 I SI;lS $150 Miscelaneoos
SU>lololI: $150
2011 $100 S25 $125 $153 M1sce1aneoos
SlbtoteI: $153
2012 $100 S25 S125 S156 MI<eeIaneous
Slblolal: SI56
2013 $100 $25 I $125 SI59 Miscdaooous
~: S159
2014 SI00 $25 I $125 $163 Miscdanoous
$950 $238 I SI.188 S1.544 5eoon<lorv Clar1fi", 114
~: $1700
2015 $0 S250 S2SO $:l31 S331 FtJlln PIi1nl Pref<rt PIarnoo
2016 $0 S7SG $750 S994 S994 FtJlln PmnI Oe$lm
2017 S7.00J $l,.wo SS..wo $11.130 $11.130 ~)f'tJue Plonl CCr>rtldoo (6Imd1. f'l1=> I
2018 S7.ooo n.wo $B..wo S11.13O $11,130 4lFulra Plllnl ~ Phase II
2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Toto/ (lntJ. S),
Toto/ (/nil. S)'
OWr.lIJT<l(;f/,
Toto/ (Ot S)'
Toto/ (In S):
~ToD/:
~/on _led ToIa/Cost
(1) Assume infIatioo @ 2.5%
(2) All yeans in which no major coostruction is planned a $100,000 miscellaneous item
is shown to cover small projects (vehicles. instrumentation, site, monitoring equipment, ele,)
(3) These Mure impruvements are to meet expected permit limits and should be funded by All use;s
of system and not only ~ connections.
(4) Future plant is based on phased isolation ditch technology wI estimates from WPCF Journal
V, 59, No, 9 & EPA Pub, 1i832.f.oo-o13. "Oxidation Ditche$" Fact Sheet
150,000 (buildout pop.) x 100 gpcd" 15 mgd buildout now
(15 mgd . 9 mgd exIg, cap,) x $3/gal 0( capacity" $16 millioo
TOTAl.:
JU,9OO
SG,/lXI
BJ'ilf2002
1996 IYou!1> 200 $11.503
$f1f,61J
W,lillS
$4O.0P8
$10,9(10
$14,000
~
$23.6 jg
Y",,",2002-2OH
r""", 2015-2020
YeolI$ 2OQ2-2OU
r...... 2015-2020
CIP Schedule
APPENDIX 58
cip&cashflowprojection
COLLECTlON-Tful. _xlensions
C:lIocI"" Sy1 Ero/-
~~.
CItciIaI Cost lonsl = QIoItaI Cool
$275 $21l2
~ $4()4
2000 $0
$180 $36 $216 ~ Ncrt1 Trui<
5912 $214 $1.186 5J,(i, 11<. Relet _. PI>ose I
Slblotol: $1,402
2001 $0 $0 $0
2002 $1.000 = $ 1.250 'Mile Trui< Cons1ru::lion [no ~)
$100 $115 $215 lo<:ost Gr<M> (VI! ACHO ro-boJld)
S<bloIaI: $1,4M
2OCO fn>.Jlt12(X $2.861
2003 $1220 $244 $1.494 $1.501 $, SIoult1 ~
$150 S30 $180 $185 0ve<1and Rood IVI! ACHD nKUIdl
$400 $.!OO $410 BIod< Car DcsIQ1
SlbIola/: S2.lIll5
:Il>>I $6,000 ~ $6.300 $6.615 Black Car Construc1on
$SO $15 $65 $66 Fnrif<1 Rood (VI! ACHD 1l>-bUId)
S<bloIaI: $6._
2005 $1,200 $221 $1,528 5MI, 11<. R_ _- _II C_n Rd, foAbertsoos)
SlbIola/: '11129
2006 $0 $0 $0
2007 $0 $0 $0
2008 $0 $0 $0
2009 $0 $0 $0
2010 $0 $0 $0
2011 $0 $0 $0
2012 $0 $0 $0
2013 $0 $0 $0
2014 $0 $0 $0
2015 $0 $0 $0
2016 $0 SO $0
2017 SO SO $0
2016 $0 SO $0
201g SO SO $0
2020 $0 $0 SO
TOTAL: SI0,814
SI,885
S10.JOlj
(1) Assume in1la1:ion @
2,50%
8/9/2002
CIP Schedule
APPENDIX 58
clp&cashfIowproject
APPENDIX SC
WASTEWATER SYSTEM CHARGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Cft}' Constructed Collection System Buy-In Charge
2002 City-Conslructed Collection Replacement Coslless Deprec:
L= Outstanding Bond Principal:
Net City-Coostructed Collection System Value:
Collection System Capacity, ERU's;
002 City Constructed Collection Buy..Jn Charge:
$5.115,242
$0
$5,115,242
$16.800
.'~~
;/J/ I~:~.' /~
_/ U lJ;~.~ i
0\..1
f2-) ~,
-, '-, ~J
i-.J J i
u JI
lJ
$304
Developer Provided Collection System Replacement Charge
2000 Developer-provided Collection Replacement Cost Less Depree:
Provide 50% for replacement:
Collection System Capacity, ERU's:
2002 Assessment Charge:
$19,095,876
$9,547,938
$16,800
Previous Collection System Charge per ERU:
Percent Change:
$568
Subtotal:
$673
30%
$873
System Development Fee (New Charge)
(see Worksheetlitled 'sewer asset summ: for separate calculations)
$815
TOTAL COLLECTION SYSTEM CHARGE:
$1,688
Wastewater Treatment Plant Assessment Charqe
2002 WlNTP Replacement Cost less Depreciation:
Less Outstandi Bond Princi I:
Net WWTP System Value:
P System Capacity, ERU's: (6,0 mgd-O.7 rfl)185 gpcdl2,9 caplERU
2001 WWTP System Charge per ERU;
$15,826,280
$0
$15,626,280
(approximately equal to 56,500 pop. Equiv.)
$736
~%r~~;~*~;~J~UJ
TOTAL WASTEWATER CHARGE:
$2,424
T etal w/o System Development Fee:
Previous Fee:
Percent Increase:
$1,609
$1,580
1.8%
8/912002
FEE SUMMARY.august
wwtp fee
8/612002
sewer&wwtp assets
FEE SUMMARY3-M2
APPENDIX 5E
-~
- " .--..~
Collection System
Current Year: 2002
Current ENR-CCI: 6500 (Spring '(2)
SUBDMSIONS (Includes ailS" fines)
Fiscal Original Cost ENR- Replacment Useful Cumulative Replacement Cost
Year Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Ufe Depreciation Less Depreciation
1973 $. 119,464 1895 $ 409,771 50 $ 67,471 $ 342,300
1976 $ 13,406 2401 $. 36,293 50 $. 6,834 $ 29,458
1978 $ 259,347 2776 $ 607,261 50 $. 120,876 $ 486,385
1979 $ 374,615 3003 $ 810,855 50 $ 166,m $. 644,078
1980 .$ 97,841 3237 .$ 196,468 50 .$ 37,'2J8 $. 159,189
1981 .$ 125,251 3535 .$ 230,306 50 .$ 52,236 .$ 178,070
1982 $ 119,260 3825 $ 202,664 50 $ 47,72:3 .$ 154,935
1983 $ 82,063 4066 .$ 131,188 50 $ 31,196 .$ 99,992
1984 $ 126,694 4146 $ 198,628 50 $ 45,112 $ 153,516
1985 $ 399,191 4195 $ 618,532 50 $ 135,727 .$ 482,804
1986 .$ 50,913 4295 $ 77,051 50 $ 16,070 .$ 60,981
1987 .$ 216,469 4406 $ 319,348 50 $ 63,952 $ 255,396
1988 .$ 131,954 4519 .$ 189,799 50 $ 35,026 $ 154,773
1989 .$ 83.045 4615 .$ 116,965 50 .$ 19,932 $. 97,033
1990 .$ 826,722 4732 .$ 1,135,607 50 $ 195,630 .$ 939,977
1991 .$ 333,757 4835 .$ 448,691 50 .$ 72,801 $ 375,889
1992 $ 1,583,551 4985 $ 2,064,811 50 $. 316,219 $ 1,748,592
1993 $ 369,220 5210 $. 460,639 50 $. 59,698 .$ 400,941
1994 .$ 1,415,693 5408 .$ 1,701,554 50 .$ 203,947 $. 1,497,608
1995 .$ 740,536 5471 .$ 879,818 50 .$ 90,796 $. 789,022
1996 .$ 912.558 5620 .$ 1,055,450 50 $ 94,144 $. 961 ,305
1997 $. 1.749,302 5826 .$ 1,951,676 50 .$ 139,820 .$ 1,811,856
1998 $. 2,098,656 5920 .$ 2,304,267 50 .$ 135,205 $ 2,169,062
1999 $ 1,770,876 6060 $. 1,899,454 50 $ 77,114 .$ 1 ,822,340
200) $ 1,980,906 6221 $ 2,069,746 50 $ 50,009 .$ 2,019,737
2001 .$ 1,240,436 6342 .$ 1,271 ,339 50 $ 11 ,039 $. 1,260,301
$ 17,221.725 .$ 21,388,180 .$ 2,292,639 $. 19,095,541
CITY PROJECTS
Fiscal Original Cost ENR. Replaement Useful Cumulative Replacement Cost
Year Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Life Depreciation Less Depreciation
1978 .$ 272,792 2776 .$ 638,742 50 .$ 110,029 $ 528,713
1979 .$ 2,309.310 3003 .$ 4,998,506 50 $ 1 ,002,215 .$ 3.996.292
1980 .$ 1,916 3237 $ 3,847 50 .$ 722 $ 3.125
1981 3535 .$ 50 $
1987 4406 .$ 50 .$
1990 4732 .$ 50 .$
1991 4835 .$ 50 $
1992 4975 .$ 50 .$
1993 5210 .$ 50 .$
1994 5408 .$ 50 .$
1995 5471 .$ 50 .$
1996 .$ 797,182 5620 .$ 922,008 50 .$ 85,883 .$ 836,125
1997 .$ 5826 .$ 50 .$
1998 .$ 304,249 5867 .$ 337,075 50 .$ 35,182 .$ 301 ,894
1999 .$ 170,410 6060 .$ 182,783 50 .$ 7,876 .$ 174,906
2(0) .$ 6221 .$ 50 .$
2001 .$ 177,545 6342 .$ 181,969 50 .$ 1,222 .$ 180,747
2002 $ 646,837 6500 .$ 646,837 50 .$ $ 646,837
.$ 4,680,242 .$ 7,911,768 .$ 1 ,243,12:3 .$ 6,668,639
TOTAL COllECTION: .$ 21 ,901 ,968 .$ 29,299,948 $ 3,535,767 .$ 25,764,180
81612002
Page 1 of 1
(-\ '\ -
, '
~~,:,~.: j " '7'? APPENDIX 5F
" -.
Page 1 of 5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AsselTypefD Year Descrlptlon Cost AccOeprAmt ERN.cCI Cost Act.Deprec. AnllOepr
SEWER DEPT per Acctg
16505 1973 SL - MEAOOW VIEW 111 $119,464 $67.471 1.895 $409,771 $342.300 52.389
16505 1976 SL . NORTHGA TE SUB #3 513,406 $6,834 2,401 $36,293 $29,458 $268
16505 1978 SL . CHERRY LANE VILLAGE #1 $126,622 $59.503 2.776 $296.485 $236,982 $2.532
16505 1978 SL . CHERRY LANE VILLAGE #2 $78,903 $36,557 2.776 $184.751 5148.194 $1.578
16505 1978 SL - GLENFIELD MANOR 111 $53.822 $24,815 2,776 5126,024 $101,209 $1.076
16505 1979 SL . FRANKLIN SQUARE 547.128 $21,216 3.003 $102,009 $80,793 $943
16505 1979 SL . CRESlWOOD ESTATES $25.329 $11.660 3.003 $54.825 $43,165 $507
16505 1979 SL - SUNNYBROOK FARMS 111 $22.170 59.821 3,003 $47.987 $38,166 5443
16505 1979 SL - SUNNYBROOK FARMS 112 $67,790 530,043 3,003 $146,732 $116.688 51,356
16505 1979 SL - GLENFIELD MANOR 112 $61.774 $27.377 3.003 $133,710 5106.333 $1,235
16505 1979 SL . CHERRY LANE EXT $99.857 $44.267 3,003 $216.141 $171.873 $1,997
16505 1979 Sl - RYAN PLACE $11,956 $5,278 3,003 $25.879 520.600 $239
16505 1979 Sl . GLENFIELD MANOR EXT 538,611 $17.114 3.003 583,574 566.460 5772
18505 1980 SL - TERROR SUBDIVISION $4.250 $1,813 3,237 $8.534 $6,721 $85
16505 1980 SL - MERIDIAN PARK ADD $54.529 524,001 3,237 S109,496 $85,495 $1.091
16505 1980 SL - MERIDIAN MEADOW #6 525.958 56,228 3,237 $52,124 545,896 $519
16505 1980 SL. HUNTER ESTATES 513,104 $5.236 3.237 $26,313 $21,077 5262
16505 1981 Sl - MERIDIAN PARK #1 552,584 $21.740 3,535 $96.689 574.949 51.052
16505 1981 Sl- MEAOOW VIEW #2 $71,450 $30,009 3.535 $131,379 $101.370 $1,429
16505 1981 SL -CUSTOM BUILDERS 51,217 $487 3,535 $2,238 51,751 $24
16505 1982 SL - MERIDIAN IND PARK rwv $525 5230 3.825 $892 $663 $11
16505 1982 SL -lOCUST GROVE IND PARK $67,000 $26,800 3,825 $113,856 587.056 $1.340
16505 1982 SL . MERIDIAN MANOR 113 551,735 520.699 3.825 $87,916 $67.217 51,035
16505 1983 SL - MERIDIAN PHOE #1 $54,528 $20.728 4.066 $87,170 $66.442 $1,091
16505 1983 SL ' SETTLERS VILLAGE rwv 527,535 $10.468 4,066 544,018 533.550 S551
16505 1984 SL - MERIDIAN PLACE PH I $52.996 S19,08O 4.146 $83,086 564.006 $1.060
16505 1984 SL ' W LAWN SUB PHASE I $18.698 $6.132 4,146 529.314 522.582 $374
16505 1984 SL - SUNNYBROOK 113 530.000 $10.800 4.146 $47.033 $36.233 $600
16505 1984 SL . THE LAKE ~ CHERRY LANE 525,000 S8.500 4.146 539,194 530,694 5500
16505 1985 SL - SUNNYBROOK #4 $29,056 $9.877 4,195 $45.024 535,147 5581
16505 198$ SL - TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS p, $370,133 $125.850 4,195 5573,508 5447,658 $7,403
16505 1986 Sl - TI-lE WJLLOWS $9,929 53,183 4,295 515.026 $11.844 5199
16505 1986 SL - MERIDIAN PARK $29,405 59.406 4.295 544.501 $35.093 5588
16505 1986 SL - MERIDIAN MANOR 114 511.579 $3,479 4,295 517.524 $14,045 $232
16505 1987 SL - THE LAKE @ CHERRY LANE 112 526,462 57.936 4.406 $39,038 531.103 5529
16505 1987 SL - FREEWAY EXT $177,791 553,339 4.406 $262.288 5208.949 53.556
16505 1987 SL - FULLER PROJECT 512,216 $2.677 4,406 $18.022 515.345 5244
16505 1986 SL . CARL TON AND EAST 1 ST 517,149 54,802 4.519 $24,667 $19.865 5343
16505 1988 SL . MERIDIAN MANOR 115 S18.805 $5,264 4,519 527,049 $21,784 5375
16505 1988 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS $96,000 524,960 4,519 $138,084 5113,124 $1,920
16505 1989 SL - CRESlWOOD 114 583,045 519,932 4,615 $116,965 597.033 51.661
16505 1990 SL -10 MILE RD $84,001 520.160 4,732 $115,386 $95.226 $1.680
16505 1990 SL .10 MILE SEWER $385.687 $92.567 4.732 $529.790 S437.223 57.714
16505 1990 SL - CHATEAU MEAOOW 551,871 $12.445 4,732 $71.251 558.806 51.037
16505 1990 SL - CHERRY LN VILLAGE 556.024 512,321 4,732 576,956 $64,635 $1.120
15505 1990 SL - CLARINDA FOUR $43.160 $10,357 4,732 559,286 548,929 $863
16505 1990 SL . CRESlWOOD #5 $9.375 $2.255 4.732 $12.878 510.623 $188
16505 1990 SL . DUNTEN PLACE $33.854 $7.447 4,732 $46,503 $39.056 $677
16505 1990 SL . GEM PARK SUB 521,000 $5,040 4,732 $28.846 $23,806 5420
16505 1990 Sl - GLENFIELD #3 $19.865 $4.765 4,732 $27.287 $22.522 5397
16505 1990 Sl ' GLENFIELD #4 $23,273 $5.116 4.732 531,968 526.852 $465
16505 1990 . SL - GOlF VIEW EST $40,286 $9,667 4,732 555,338 $45,671 $806
16505 1990 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS #3 $33,120 57,945 4,732 $45.495 $37,549 5662
16505 1990 Sl- CRESlWOOD $25.206 $5.544 4,732 $34.624 529,079 $504
16505 1991 SL . lANDING n1 $55.783 512,275 4.835 $74.993 $62.718 $1.116
16505 1991 SL - GLENFIELD #5 514.860 $3,268 4,835 519,977 $16,710 5297
16505 1991 SL . GlENFIELD #6 S15,620 53,433 4,835 520,999 517.566 $312
16505 1991 SL - DUNTEN PL n2 $26,596 $5,874 4,835 $35.889 $30.015 $534
16505 1991 SL ' MISTY MEAOOW #2 $22.172 54,874 4,835 $29.807 524.933 $443
16505 1991 Sl- CENTRAl VALLEY #2 $48,552 $10,581 4,835 $65,272 554,590 $971
16505 1991 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW #2 $24,626 $5.422 4,835 $33,106 527.685 $493
16505 1991 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW 111 $21,445 $4.719 4,835 $28,830 524,111 $429
16505 1991 Sl - a-tA TEAU MEADOW 115 $33.805 57.436 4.835 $45.446 $38.010 $676
16505 1991 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW 116 $12.786 $2,815 4,635 $17,189 $14.374 $256
16505 1991 SL - MISTY MEAOOWS 111 $26,210 $5,765 4.835 535,236 $29,471 5524
16505 1991 SL. MERRYWOOD 111 $31.202 $6,240 4.835 $41 ,947 535,707 5624
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST 111 553,649 $10.730 4,985 $69.954 $59,224 $1.073
16505 1992 SL - HAVEN COVE #1 S58,671 $11,242 4,985 576.502 $65.260 $1.173
16505 1992 SL . T LANDING #2 $34.479 56,899 4,985 544.958 538,059 5690
16505 1992 Sl - T LANDING #3 $28.060 55.611 4,985 $36,588 530.977 5561
16505 1992 Sl . TRACT SUB 111 $95,330 $19,069 4.985 $124,302 $105,233 51.907
16505 1992 SL . KEARNEY PL 111 $26.723 S5.341 4,985 $34.844 $29.503 $534
81612002
sewer&WW1p assets
FEE SUMMARY,3-6-02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 2 of5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Oescrl ption Cost AccOeprAmt ERN-CCI Cost ActDeprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT per Acctg
16505 1992 SL . MIRAGE MEADOWS $41.198 $8,240 4.985 $53,719 $45.479 $824
16505 1992 SL ' GLENFIELD #4 PHASE2 $4,863 5971 4.985 $6.341 $5.370 $97
16505 1992 SL - GLENFIELD #7 $19,553 $3.910 4,985 525,495 $21.585 $391
16505 1992 SL . GLENFIELD 118 $18,460 $3.691 4.985 $24.070 $20,380 $369
16505 1992 SL . GLENFIELD #9 $36.876 $7.379 4.985 548,083 $40.704 $738
16505 1992 SL . GEM PARK #2 $27.907 $5.580 4.985 $36.388 $30.808 $558
16505 1992 SL. CHATEAU MEADOW 114 $4,278 $859 4,985 $5.578 $4,719 $86
16505 1992 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW 116 $33.549 $6.710 4,985 $43.745 $37,035 $671
16505 1992 SL - CRYSTAL SRPINGS 111 $24,220 $4,841 4,985 $31.581 $26,740 $484
16505 1992 SL. CRYSTAL SPRINGS #2 $29,000 $5.800 4,985 $37,813 $32,013 $580
16505 1992 SL - HON-DAIRY GUEON $34,370 $6,871 4,985 $44.815 $37,944 $687
16505 1992 SL - MEADOWS GREENS 112 $135,223 $27,041 4,985 $176.319 $149,277 $2,704
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST 112 $22,683 $4,539 4,985 $29,577 $25.038 $454
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST fI3 $21,702 $4, 340 4,985 $28.297 $23,957 $434
16505 1992 SL - DEERFIELD SUB $18.362: $3.669 4.985 $23,942 $20.274 $367
16505 1992 Sl- MERIDIAN MANOR #7 $43,250 $8,650 4,985 $56,394 $47,744 $865
16505 1992: SL -CHERRY LN 113 B & C $56,663 $11,331 4.985 $73,884 $62:,553 $1,133
18505 1992 SL - WATERBURY PARK #1 $23,250 $4,650 4,985 $30,316 $25,666 $465
16505 1992 SL. VINEYARDS #1 $57.878 $11.579 4.985 $75.468 $63,889 $1,158
16505 1992 SL . ONE SUB #3 $37,000 $7.400 4.985 $48.245 $40,845 $740
16505 1992 SL - TRACT SUB #2 539,004 $7,800 4.985 $50,858 $43,058 $780
16505 1992 SL . KEARNEY PLACE #2 $2:6.343 $5,270 4,985 534.349 52:9,079 $527
16505 1992: SL - CANDLELIGHT SUB #1 $36,967 $7,391 4,985 $48,202 $40.811 $739
16505 1992 SL - MERIDIAN PlACE #3 $46,150 $9.230 4.985 $60.176 $50,946 $923
16505 1992 SL. MERRYWOOD #2 $23,531 $4,709 4,985 530,862 $25,973 $471
16505 1992 SL . SO SLOUGH LINE $249.735 $49.949 4.985 $325.632: $275,683 $4,995
16505 1992 SL - N MERIDIAN ROAD $171,226 $34,249 4,985 $223,264 5189.015 $3,425
16505 1992 SL . ADD 10 MILE SEWER $3,398 $680 4,985 $4,431 $3.751 $68
16505 1993 SL - HAVEN COVE #2 $55,876 $9.502 5.210 $69,711 $60,209 $1,118
16505 1993 SL . VINEYARD #3 $36,884 $6,026 5,210 $46.017 $39.990 $738
16505 1993 SL - PARKWOOD MEADOW #2 $19.617 $3.170 5.210 $24,474 $21,304 $392
16505 1993 SL - PARKWOOD MEADOWS #1 $51.238 $8,284 5,210 $63.92:5 $55,640 $1,025
16505 1993 SL - LANDING SUB #5 $29,822 $4,819 5.210 $37.206 $32.387 $596
16505 1993 SL - LOCUST GROVE S LINE EXT $22.089 $3,535 5.210 $27.558 $24.023 $442
16505 1993 SL - HUNTER GLEN APTS $16,114 $2,577 5.210 $20,104 $17.527 $322
16505 1993 SL - TRACT SUB #3 $45,079 $7,139 5,210 $56,241 $49,102 $902
16505 1993 SL - SUNNYBROOK lIS $34,438 $5.453 5,210 $42,965 $37,512 $689
16505 1993 SL - LANDING #fj $35,671 $5,646 5.210 $44,503 $38.857 $713
16505 1993 SL - KEARNEY PLACE #3 $22,392 $3.547 5,210 $27,936 $24,390 $448
16505 1994 SL - CHERRY LANE 114 $27,732: $4,300 5.408 $33,332 $29,032 $555
16505 1994 SL - CANDLELIGHT #2 $43.407 $6,727 5,408 $52:.172 $45.444 $868
16505 1994 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS 111 $58.207 $9.021 5.408 $69,960 $60,939 $1,164
16505 1994 SL . VINEYARDS #4 $36.024 $5,581 5.408 $43.298 $37,717 $720
16505 1994 SL - WATERBURY #2 $27,632 $4.192 5,408 $33,212 $29,02:0 $553
16505 1994 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS #2 $32,289 54,790 5.408 $38,809 $34.019 $646
16505 1994 SL . SPORTSMAN PONTE #3 $51.279 $7,608 5.408 $61.633 $54,026 $1.026
16505 1994 SL - MIER MANOR 118 $34,945 $5.184 5,408 $42,001 $36,818 5699
16505 1994 SL. WINGATE #1 $19,030 $2.793 5,408 $22.873 $20,080 $381
16505 1994 Sl - SADqLE Vltw 111 $77,350 $11,345 5,408 $92,969 $81,624 51,547
16505 1994 SL - HAVEN COVE 113 $55,821 $8,185 5,408 $67,093 $58,907 $1,116
16505 1994 SL . SUMMERFIELD 111 $177,287 $25,707 5.408 $213,085 $187,378 $3,546
16505 1994 ' SL . CROSSROADS #1 $90,678 $12,999 5,408 $108,988 $95,989 $1,814
16505 1994 SL - TRACT SUB 114 $126,809 $17,964 5,408 $152,415 $134.451 $2,536
16505 1994 SL . S SLOUGH LINE $207,561 $29,404 5.408 $249,472 $220,069 $4,151
16505 1994 SL - FEf#'JAYII2 $33.934 $4,809 5,408 $40,786 $35,977 $679
16505 1994 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE 114 $69,050 $9,552 5.408 $82,993 $73,441 $1,381
16505 1994 SL - VINEYARDS lIS $44,528 $6,161 5.408 $53.519 $47,359 $891
16505 1994 SL - FOTHERGILL POINTE 111 $60,000 $10,933 5,408 $96,154 $65.221 $1,600
16505 1994 SL - CANDlELIGHT 113 $44,540 $6,087 5,408 $53,534 $47,446 $891
16505 1994 SL . FENWAY PARK 113 $10,583 $1,447 5,408 $12:,720 $11,273 $212
16505 1994 SL - CROSSROADS #2 $38,206 $5,22:1 5,408 $45.921 $40,699 $764
16505 1994 SL - MANHOLES $26,801 $3,936 5,408 $34,617 $30,681 $576
16505 1995 SL . WATERBURY 114 $22,503 $2,962 5.471 $26,735 $23.773 $450
16505 1995 SL - MERIDIAN ST $69,706 $9,177 5,471 $82,616 $73,639 $1,394
16505 1995 SL . CHERRY LANE $4,537 $590 5.471 $5,390 $4,800 $91
16505 1995 SL - PIEDMONT $24,060 $3,087 5,471 $28,585 $25.499 $481
16505 1995 SL . DANBURY FAIR 113 $38.054 $4,883 5.471 $45,211 $40,328 $761
16505 1995 SL - DANBURY 114 $59,286 $7,510 5.471 $70,437 $62,927 $1,186
16505 1995 SL - LOCUST GROVE STUBS $5,600 $691 5.471 $6,653 $5,962 $112
16505 1995 SL. HAVEN COVE #4 $45,704 $5,636 5,471 $54,300 $48,664 $914
16505 1995 SL - FIELDSTONE 113 $54,376 $6,527 5,471 $64,603 $58,077 $1,088
16505 1995 SL - FOTHERGILL POINTE 112 $85.501 $10.260 5,471 $101,582 $91,322 51,710
8/612002
sewer&lWItp assets
FEE SUMMARY,3-6-02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 3 of 5
Replacement
Replacement Cost' less
AssetTypelD Year Descrlptlon Cost AccDeprAmt ERn.eCI Cost Act.Deprec, P.nn Depr
SEWER OEPT per Acctg
16505 1995 SL - TRACT #SA $31.361 $3.763 5,471 537.259 533,497 $627
16505 1995 SL . LAKE @ CHERRY LANE 113 595.100 511,412 5.471 $112.987 5101.575 51,902
16505 1995 SL - NAVARRO 541.366 54.963 5.471 549.146 $44.183 5827
16505 1995 SL - BEDFORD PLACE 111 599.246 511,745 5.471 5117,915 5106.170 51,985
16505 1995 SL - CANNA LILLY 516,794 51.988 5,471 $19,953 $17,965 5336
16505 1995 SL . SUM MERFIELD 112 547.340 55,602 5.471 $56,244 $50,641 5947
16505 1996 SL - AVEST PLAZA 539,428 $4.207 5.620 545,602 $41,395 5789
16505 1996 SL - CHAMBERLAIN #1 554,271 $5,788 5,620 $62,769 556,981 $1,085
16505 1996 SL . DANBURY #5 $38,091 $4,190 5,620 $44,055 $39.865 $762
16505 1996 SL - DANBURY #7 $102.567 $10,256 5.620 5118,627 $108,371 $2.051
16505 1996 SL - FIELDSTONE #4 $40.303 $4,164 5,620 $46,614 $42.450 $806
16507 1996 SL - FIELDSTONE #5 SUB $52.199 $5,045 5,520 $60,373 $55,327 $1,044
15507 1996 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS #4 $40.303 $4,030 5,620 $4$,614 $42.584 $806
16505 1996 SL - HAVEN COVE #5 $44,785 $4,628 5,620 $51.798 $47,169 $896
16505 1996 SL - HAVEN COVE 116 56.815 $704 5,620 $7,882 57.178 5136
16505 1996 SL - LA PLAYA 562,938 $6,818 5,620 $72,793 $65,975 $1,259
16505 1996 SL - LANDING SEWER LIFT STATION $6,898 $678 5,620 $7,978 $7,300 5138
16505 1996 SL - LOS ALAMITOS #2A $97.450 510.232 5,620 $112,709 5102,477 51.949
16505 1996 SL - MANHOLE ON BROADWAY AND 3 $9,175 $887 5.620 $10,612 $9,725 $184
16505 1996 SL - MER. BUSINESS PARK 1/2 $59,363 $6,332 5,620 568,658 $62,326 $1.187
16505 1996 SL - MIDTOWN SQUARE $46,500 $5,038 5,620 $53,781 $48.743 $930
16505 1996 SL - SALMON RAPIDS 1/1 592.500 59.250 5,620 5106,984 $97,734 $1.850
16505 1996 SL . SALMON RAPIDS #2 $89.500 58,950 5.620 $103,514 $94,564 $1.790
16505 1996 SL - TRACT 115B $29,472 $2,946 5,620 $34,087 $31.141 $589
16505 1997 SL - CARll TON STREET SEWERLlNE $9.196 5705 5,825 $10,262 $9,557 5184
16507 1997 SL - FOTHERGILL POINTE SUB 1/3 $22.285 $1,968 5,825 $24,867 522.899 $446
16507 1997 SL - RAILSIDE PARK SUB $37,197 $3,162 5.825 541.507 $38,346 $744
16507 1997 SL - SUMMERFIELD 1/2 SUB $47.340 $4,024 5,825 $52,826 $48,801 $947
16507 1997 SL . SUMMERFIELD SUB 113B $31,599 $2,633 5,825 $35.261 532.628 5632
16507 1997 SL - CHAMBERLAINE ESTATES # 1 558,777 $4,703 5.825 $65.588 $60.885 $1,176
16507 1997 SL - CHAMBERLAINE ESTATES 1/2 $54,271 $4,342 5,825 $60.560 $56.218 $1,085
16507 1997 SL - CHAPPARRAL ELEM SCHOOL $6.944 $556 5,825 $7,749 $7,193 5139
16507 1997 SL - CROSSROADS 113 $40,788 $3,263 5,825 $45.515 $42,251 $816
16507 1997 SL . CROSSROADS #4 $31,908 $2,552 5.825 $35,605 $33,053 $638
16507 1997 SL - DANBURY FAIR 117 $102.567 $8.205 5,825 $114.452 $106.247 $2.051
16507 1997 SL - DOVE MEADOWS 1/2 $47,000 $3.760 5,825 $52,446 $48,686 5940
16507 1997 SL - ENGLEWOOD CREEK #1 $59,626 $4,771 5,825 $66,535 $61.765 $1.193
16507 1997 SL . FINCH CREEK PH 2 $37,619 $3,009 5,825 $41.978 538,969 $752
16507 1997 SL . FIRELIGHT ESTATES $30.074 $2,405 5.825 $33,559 $31,154 $601
16507 1997 SL - HAVEN COVE 1/5B $33,606 $2,688 5,825 $37,500 534,812 $672
16507 1997 SL . KENTFIELD MANOR 112 530.395 $2,432 5,825 533,917 $31,485 $608
16507 1997 SL - LANDINGS 119 $69,067 $5,525 5,825 $77,070 $71,545 $1.381
16507 1997 SL - LOS ALAMITOS 112B $6,000 $480 5.825 $6,695 $6.215 $120
16507 1997 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS 113 $37,197 $2,976 5,825 $41,507 $38,532 5744
16507 1997 SL . MORNING GLORY 112 $52.153 54.172 5.825 $58,196 $54.024 $1,043
16507 1997 SL - RAVIN HILL 1/1 $55,734 $4,459 5,825 $62.192 557.733 $1,115
16507 1997 SL - SALMON RAPIDS 113 $71,748 $5,740 5,825 $80,062 $74.322 51,435
16507 1997 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE #5 $52,112 $4,169 5,825 $58,151 $53,982 $1,042
16507 1997 SL . SPORTSMAN POINTE 116 $26,877 $2.151 5,825 $29,992 $27.841 5538
16507 1997 SL - STRATFORD PLAZA 111 $10,761 $861 5,825 $12,008 $11,147 $215
16507 1997 SL - SUMMERFIELD I13A $74.906 $5,992 5,825 $83,586 $77,594 $1.498
16507 1997 , SL - TUTHILL 112 $59.603 $4,768 5,825 $66,510 561,742 $1,192
16507 1997 SL- WATERBURY PARK #5 $57,065 $4,565 5,825 $63.678 $59,113 51.141
16507 1997 SL - WHITESTONE #1 $178,025 $14,243 5,825 $198.655 $184,412 $3,561
16507 1997 SL - WINGATE PLACE 112 $60,800 $4,864 5,825 $67,845 $62,981 $1,216
16507 1997 SL - LOS ALAMITOS 113 $88,700 $6,948 5,825 $98,979 $92,031 $1,774
16507 1997 SL - BEDFORD PLACE tIJ $36,627 $2,870 5,825 $40,871 $38,002 $733
16507 1997 SL - CROSSROADS #5 $33,191 $2,544 5,825 $37,037 $34,493 $664
16507 1997 SL - TUMBlE CREEK 111 $97.544 $7,316 5,825 $108.847 $101,532 $1,951
16505 1998 SL- WASHINGTON AND 2ND SEWERl $4,798 $352 5,920 $5,268 $4,916 $96
16507 1998 SL- ASHFORD GREENS #2 $133,818 $9,813 5,920 $14$,929 $137,115 $2.676
16507 1998 SL- BEDFORD PLACE #4 $35.679 $2.141 5,920 $39.175 $37,034 $714
16507 1998 SL - Central Valley Corp Park 116 S€werli $64,847 $3,891 5,920 $71.201 $67,310 $1.297
16507 1998 SL - CROSSROADS #6 $36,019 $2,281 5,920 $39,548 $37,267 $720
16507 1998 SL - Crossroads #7 Sewerlines $61.603 $3,491 5,920 $67,638 $64,146 $1,232
16507 1998 SL - Englewood Creek 112 Sewerlines $63.113 $3,787 5.920 $69.296 $65.510 $1,262
16507 1996 SL - GRANITE CREEK $32,986 $2,254 5.920 $36,218 $33.964 $650
16507 1998 SL . Haven Cove #7 Sewerlines $42,316 $2,539 5,920 $46,462 $43,923 $846
16507 1998 SL - LAKE @ CHERRY LANE #5 $247,200 $18,128 5.920 $271,419 $253,291 $4,944
16507 1998 SL . LAKE @ CHERRY lANE IIfj $51,200 $3,584 5,920 $56,216 $52,632 $1,024
16507 1998 SL - Lake@Cherry Lane #4, PhIIl sewerl $66,000 $3,960 5,920 $72.466 $68,506 $1,320
16507 1998 SL - lake@Ct1erry Lane #7 sewerlines $50,400 $3,024 5,920 $55.338 $52,314 $1,008
8/6f2oo2
SCW'er&..........tp assets
FEE SUMMARY,3.G-02
APPENDIX SF
Page4of5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccDeprAml ERN.cCI Cost Act. Depree. AnnDepr
SEWER OEPT, per Acctg
16507 1998 SL . MEDIMONT 596.099 $6.727 5.920 $105.514 $98.767 $1.922
16507 1996 SL . Meridian Greens tl3 & tl4 sewerllnes $35.700 $2,083 5,920 $39,198 $37.115 $714
16507 1998 SL . MERIDIAN GREENS UNIT 3 PH VI $30.631 $2,246 5.920 $33.632 $31,386 $613
16507 1998 SL - Packard SubdMs;on tll offsile $162,357 $10,637 5.920 5200,223 $169.586 $3,647
16507 1998 SL . Packard SubdMsion tll sewerlines $60.052 $3.503 5.920 $65,935 $62.432 $1,201
16507 1998 SL . Raven Hill 112 $26.432 $1,659 5.920 $31.218 $29,559 $569
16507 1998 SL - SALMON RAPIDS 114 $89,600 $6. 123 5.920 $96,378 $92.255 $1.792
16505 1998 SL. Sev.erHne @LocuslGrove $5,497 $312 5.920 $6.036 $5.724 5110
16505 1998 Sl - Sev.erline Extension $3,252 $195 5,920 $3,571 $3,376 $65
16507 1998 Sl . Sherbrooke Hollaws tll $242,095 $14.122 5,920 $265.814 $251,692 $4.842
16507 1998 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE #7 539,179 $2.677 5,920 $43.017 540,341 $784
16507 1998 SL. SUMMERFIELD 115 $21,641 $1,587 5.920 $23.761 $22,17 4 $433
16507 1998 SL - TRALJrNER BUSINESS PARK $83,000 56,087 5,920 591.132 $85,045 $1,660
16507 1998 SL . Tumble Creek 112 $69,000 $4,140 5.920 575,760 $71,620 $1,380
16507 1998 SL - TURN BERRY 111 5168,664 $10.120 5.920 $185.169 5175,069 $3,373
16507 1998 Sl - WHlTESTONE 553,477 $3,744 5,920 $58,716 $54.973 $1,070
16505 1999 Sl - 5 Mile Griffin Sewerline Extension 510,283 $463 6.060 $11,030 510,567 $206
16507 1999 SL . Devlin Place Sewerlines $59,220 $3,257 6,060 $63,520 $60,263 $1,184
16505 1999 Sl . Or-mage @ Lake al CherJy Lane 51.350 $70 6,060 $1.448 $1,376 $27
16507 1999 Sl - Econo-Lube SubdMsion Sewerlines $28,420 $1,516 6,060 530.483 $26,968 $568
16507 1999 SL . GolMew Sewerlines $49,390 $2,140 6,060 $52.976 $50,636 $968
16507 1999 SL . Haven Cove Iffl Sev.er1ines 524.047 $1,122 6.060 $25.793 $24,671 $461
16507 1999 SL - Home Depot Sewerline $2,800 $154 6.060 $3,003 $2.849 $56
16507 1999 Sl - Honor Park 113 Pht/l sewerlines $12,191 $589 6,060 $13.076 $12,487 $244
16507 1999 Sl. landing 1110 sewerlines $36,182 $1.626 6.060 536.609 $37,181 $724
16507 1999 SL - SterlIng Creek $36.623 51,831 6,060 $39.282 $37,451 $732
16507 1999 SL - Tel-Pac sewerlines $3,600 $196 6,060 $3.661 $3,663 $72
16507 1999 SL . Thousand Spongs 111 $95.990 $4,160 6.080 5102,960 $98.600 51,920
16507 1999 SL . Thunder Creek 556.645 52.737 6,060 $62.903 560,166 51,173
16507 1999 SL - Turtle Creek #1 5110,267 $4.594 6,060 $118,273 5113,679 52,205
16507 1999 SL . VanAuker-Eagle Road Sewer 5585,000 $27.300 6,060 $627,475 5600.175 $11,700
16507 1999 Sl . Whtteslone Eslales $11.980 5559 6.060 $12,850 512,291 5240
16507 1999 Sl - Ashford Greens 113 543,191 $1.728 6.060 $46,326 544.599 $864
16507 1999 SL . Chevron @ Eagle Road 56,535 5261 6.060 $7,009 56.746 $131
16507 1999 SL . Dakola Ridge 111 $34.503 $1.380 6,060 537,008 $35,626 5690
16507 1999 SL - Family Center 559,900 52.396 6,060 $64.249 $81,653 51,198
16507 1999 Sl - Sherbrooke HolICl'M; #2 $49,195 $1,968 6.060 $52,767 $50,799 $964
16507 1999 SL . Sherbrooke Hollows 113 $57,599 52,304 6,060 561,761 559.477 51,152
16507 1999 SL . Tumble Creek 113 $49.000 51,960 6.060 $52.558 $50,598 $960
16507 1999 SL . Whileslone Estates tl3 $17.028 $661 6,060 $18,264 517,563 $341
16507 1999 SL . RC Willey 528,046 $1,122 6,060 530.062 $28.961 $561
16507 1999 S L . Cherry Lane Village lIS Ph, B 545,776 $1,676 6,060 $49.100 547,421 $916
16507 1999 Sl - Thousand Springs 112 563,800 $2,339 6,060 $68,432 566,093 $1.276
16507 1999 Sl - lake@Cherry Lane 115 Phase 8 $164,800 56,043 6,060 $176,766 $170,723 $3,296
16507 1999 SL - Central Drive Extension to Jabil $25,515 5936 6,060 527,368 $26.432 $510
16505 2000 SL . Five Mile Sewer Ext@184 & Overlanc $22.467 5749 6.221 $23.475 $22,726 5449
16505 2000 Sl - Sewerline Extension @ WINTP in 2C 547,060 $1.020 6.221 549,192 $46,172 $942
16505 2000 SL . Sewerline Rehab @ Plaza $70,998 51,302 6.221 574.162 $72,680 $1,420
16507 2000 SL - Thou~nd Springs Village 596.425 $3,375 6,221 $100,749 $97,375 51,929
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs #4 514,430 $505 6.221 $15.077 $14,572 $269
16507 2000 SL . Holiday Inn Express - Offsite $23,174 $611 6.221 $24.213 523.402 $463
16507 2000 ~ SL - Meridian RillerValley otfsJle PaCkar $24,960 5874 6,221 $26,079 $25,206 $499
16507 2000 SL . Brenda Estatesllhe Villas $37,455 $1,249 6,221 $39,135 $37,866 $749
16507 2000 SL . Dakota Ridge #2 $34,561 $1.152 6,221 $36,111 $34,959 $691
16507 2000 Sl . Packard 112 $13,710 5457 6,221 $14,325 $13,868 $274
16507 2000 Sl - Parkway Plaza $111,461 $3,716 6,221 5116,481 5112,765 $2.230
16507 2000 SL - Landing 1111 $35,666 51,190 6,221 $37,286 $36,097 $714
16507 2000 Sl - MedimOl1t #2 $18,604 5558 6,221 $19,439 $16,881 5372
16507 2000 Sl - Deejay aka Murdoch 590,799 $2,724 6,221 594,871 $92,147 $1,816
16507 2000 Sl . Haven Cove #10 $7.910 $237 6,221 $6,265 $6,027 $158
16507 2000 Sl - Haven Cove 119 529,506 $665 6,221 $30,831 529,946 5590
16507 2000 SL . Meridian Charter High School $2.460 $74 6.221 52,570 $2,497 $49
16507 2000 SL . Haven Cove 1110 - Pine st Extension 531,169 $935 6,221 $32,567 $31,632 $623
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs #5 S97,945 $2,775 6.221 $102,338 $99,563 $1,959
16507 2000 SL . Packard #3 $36,832 $982 6,221 $36,483 537,501 5737
16507 2000 Sl . Maw.; Addition 113 $10,415 $276 6,221 $10,882 $10,604 $208
16507 2000 Sl - LOS Church @ Black Cat Rd $20,800 5520 6,221 $21,733 521,213 $416
16507 2000 Sl - Sherbrooke Hollows 114 541,306 $1,033 6,221 $43,158 $42,125 $826
16507 2000 SL . Inlerstate Battery @ Franklin $9.050 5226 6,221 $9,456 59,230 $181
16507 2000 SL - LOS Church @ locust Grove $3.261 $76 6,221 53,407 53,331 $65
16507 2000 Sl - Oakbrook Plaza 527,494 $642 6,221 528,727 $28,085 $550
16507 2000 Sl - Melidian Lewls&Clark Middle School $11,994 $260 6.221 512,532 $12,272 $240
8/1312002
sewer&wwtp assets
FEE SUMMARY,3-6-02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 5 of 5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AsselTypelD Year Des<:rlptlon Cost AccDeprArnt ERN.cCI Cost Act.Deprec. AlmDepr
SEWER DEPf, per Acctg
16507 2000 SL ~ Meridian Peregrine Elemenla ry $15.472 $335 6.221 $16,166 $15.631 $309
16507 2000 SL ~ Whrtestone Eslales 114 $27.553 $597 6,221 $26,769 $28,192 $551
16507 2000 CC ~ Sue's Subdivlsion $30.251 $605 6.221 $31.608 $31.003 $605
16507 2000 CC - Vienna Woods Subd $231,689 $4.634 6,221 $242,080 $237,446 $4.634
16507 2000 CC. MidValley Business Pall< III $16.970 $339 6.221 $17,731 $17.392 $339
16507 2000 CC Oliason Park SUbdIVISion $40,894 $818 6,221 $42.728 $41.910 $818
16507 2000 CC - Turtle Creek Subd $96.757 $1,935 6,221 $101,097 $99,161 51.935
16507 2000 Cc. Thousand Springs $97.945 $1,959 6,221 $ 1 02.338 $100,379 $1.959
16507 2000 CC Hartford Estales Subdivlsion $85,874 $1,574 6,221 $89.725 $88,151 $1,717
16507 2000 CC ~ Vienna Woods Hl Subel $60,792 $1,115 6,221 $63.516 $62.404 $1.216
16507 2000 CC - Vienna Woods 112 Subd $60.387 $1,107 6,221 $63,095 $61.988 $1,208
16507 2000 CC St Lukes Road Ex! $13,350 $245 6,221 $13,949 $13,704 $267
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs 113 $125,040 $4,376 6,221 $130,648 $126.271 $2,501
16507 2000 CC - Tumble Creek Subd 114 $51,030 $851 6,221 $53.319 $52.468 $1.021
16507 2000 cc. GoII View Subdivision No 5 $32,540 $542 6,221 $33,999 $33.457 $651
16507 2000 SL- Ashford Greens 1/4 $22,388 $373 6,221 $23.392 $23,019 $448
16505 2001 S~rline . Sews installed @ Ten Mile $57.750 $385 6,342 $59,189 $58,804 $1,155
16507 2001 CC . Bulte Fence $6.832 $57 6.342 $7,002 $6,945 $137
16507 2001 CC - Creekside Arbour Apts Phase 2 $62,000 $930 6,342 $63.545 $62.615 $1,240
16507 2001 CC . Edinburgh Place S80.502 $537 6,342 S82.508 $81,971 $1.610
16507 2001 CC . Honor Park Subdivision No 3A $42.501 $213 6,342 $43,560 $43,347 $850
16507 2001 CC - Penn Station Apartments $18.258 $61 6,342 $18,713 $18.652 $365
16507 2001 CC - Resolution Subdivlsi<m $78,018 $520 6.342 $79.962 $79,442 $1.560
16507 2001 CC . Scottsdale Subvision $18.489 $92 6,342 $18.950 $18.857 $370
16507 2001 CC. Snorting Bull Subd Phase 111 Ioopc- $304.137 $4,562 6,342 $311,714 $307.151 $6.083
16507 2001 CC - Tarawood $33,055 $165 6,342 $33,879 $33,71 4 $661
16507 2001 CC - The La~es @ Cheny Lane #9 Subd $24,949 $208 6,342 $25.571 $25,363 $499
16507 2001 CC . Tremont Subd- North $93,358 $622 6,342 $95,684 $95,061 $1.867
16507 2001 CC - Tumble Creek Sub #5 & 6 S86,880 $290 6.342 $89,044 $88.755 $1,738
16507 2001 CC - Tumoorry Subd #2 $75,170 $1,002 6,342 $77,042 $76,040 $1.503
16507 2001 CC - Vienna Woods 113 $54,022 $180 6,342 $55.368 555,188 $1,080
16507 2001 CC ~ Vienna Woods #4 $32,714 $55 6,342 $33,529 $33,474 $654
16507 2001 CC . Wesley Sub s~rllnes $28,856 $192 6,342 $29.575 $29,383 $577
16507 2001 CC - Wilkins Ranch $92.360 S462 6,342 $94,660 $94.199 $1,847
16507 2001 CC - Wood haven Subd $50.585 $506 6,342 $51,845 $51.339 Sl,012
$17,221,725 $2.292,639 $21,388,515 519.095.876 $344.435
City . Collection System
60-1mprv-VI/W CC 1978 Improve. S~! Rehab (granl) $272,792 $110.029 2,776 $638,742 $528.713 $5.456
60.sewlines CC 1979 SL ' SEWER L1NES-GRANT $2,309.310 $1.002,215 3,003 $4,998.506 $3,996.292 $46.186
60-lmprv-VI/W CC 1980 ImpfOltl:' - S~r Rehab $1.916 $722 3,237 $3.847 $3.125 $38
60-Sewerlines 1996 SL - FIVE MILE DRAIN $739,692 $80,134 5,620 5655.516 $775.382 $14,794
60.S~rlines 1996 SL. GREGORY SEWER LIFT STATION 557.490 $5,749 5,620 $66,492 $60.7 43 $2,875
60-Lift 1996 Pump - ASHFORD GREENS LIFT STAT! $300,997 $35.117 5,867 $333.472 $298,355 $30,100
60-Sewe~ines 1998 SL - Sewerline Extension $3,252 $65 5.867 $3,603 $3,538 $65
60-Lift 1999 Pump - Replace Lift Pump $9.602 $640 6,060 $10.299 59.659 $960
60.s~rlines 1999 SL . Fran~ljn Road S~rline $160,808 $7,236 6,060 $172,484 $165.247 $3.216
60-Sewerlines 2001 SL - S~rline @ WWTP Plant $122,170 $1,222 6.342 $125,213 $123,992 $2.443
60-CIP-VI/WTP 2001 CIP - Five Mile S~f Trunk Relief $55.376 $0 6,342 $56,755 $56.755 $1,108
60-Clp.VI/WTP 2002 . CIP - Whtte Drain Sewer Trunk $43.732 $0 6,500 $43.732 $43,732 S875
60-CIP-WWTP 2002 CIP - 2001 Sewerline Whtte Drain Trunk $4,350 $0 6,500 $4,350 $4,350 $87
60-CIP.VI/WTP 2002 CIP - 2001 S~!1lne improvemenl@LocI $5.711 $0 6,500 $5.711 $5.711 $114
60-CIP-WWTP 2002 CIP . 2001 Sewerline Five Mile Relief $530,767 $0 6,500 $530,767 $530,767 $10.615
60.clP.WWTP 2002 2001 South Slough S~r Trunldine Ex! $62,278 $0 6,500 $62,278 $62,278 $1,246
$4,680,242 $1,243,129 $89,294 $7.911,768 $6,668,639 $120,177
81612002
sewer&""'-'tp assets
FEE SUMMARV,3-6-02
81912002
WATER EngIMTIn
WU1et' legal C<>st$
Cl>plllI Cost roo <IoIllrs I
Wole<'S)'s,
C"l"""'CosI
"4zS1e<<. 11
YeN '00 60lfirs xUXlO TotuJ X 1,000 Sctle<1Jed
2000 ~ s.4OO W.1ertn6 Proled Ph 2
S200 S200 FutlnI W.... SI1Ira. R~ Walt>" RIO'TfS
$45 S9 ss.c We{ 16 Geno.-alor
S<bl<Mt S<blolaI: $M4
2001 S400 S&l $-l!12 We! 21 lteOlacas We! No. 81
$200 S200 ~c Model Uodale
S400 S&l S400 We! 22 fa- Ot>el<)
S500 Wllle<ino Proled ldos<l boosl
SI.t>lolot SlOlotaJ: $11n
2002 $800 $160 $1.008 Wets 23 & 24 (ldcMiIM, 10Ml1e 10 loats1 Grovel
$1,500 ~ $1.890 Wa\er1ne Prolocl Iclose boosl
SlbIot8I: S<bIlXot $2,B9ll
2000 l'T'ou;t12002: $4, T24
= $2(l() $40 $140 $146 ~
~ $llO = $-192 We! 25
~ $lID S400 $492 We! 26
SlOlotaJ: 5WlolaI: $1 23()
2004 S400 $lID $460 S504 WeI 26
S500 $100 $600 $630 Wo1e< line looo O=ses
S<bIoIaI: SlbIoIaJ: $11:\.4
2005 S200 $40 $140 $158 Miscelaroeoos
SWlolat &bto(at =
2006 $1.500 ~ $1.800 $1.000 ReseMllr ll'3/soo1h 0( Wl41. Wel27
$0
$SOO $100 $660 Waw Urn loop Oostros
SlbIoIaJ: SlbIoIaJ: 12640
2007 S400 $IlO $460 I $540 WeI 28
SlbIoIaJ, Sl.blota/, $S4lI
2000 $200 $40 $240 T $276 Misceloneous
S500 $100 $600 I S690 Wale<' line Loop Oostros
SlbIolaI; SlbIolaI, -
2009 S400 $lID $460 T $5&1 We! 29
T
SWIDIaI: 5WlolaI: $564
2010 S400 $llO S400 T $576 WeI 30
S500 $100 $600 I $720 Wale1' Une loop Oostros
S<blolaI: SlbIoIaJ: $1200
2011 s:lOO $7l1 $420 T $515 MIS<:eIaneous
SlbtotlJ: &biotal: $515
2012 $200 $40 $140 I ~ M1scdaneoos
S500 $100 $600 I $7BO Waw line Loop O=ses
Sl.blota/: Slb<otaI: $1080
2013 S400 $SO S480 1 $612 Wel31
SlbIoIaJ, &biotal: $612
2014 S200 $40 $240 I $312 M1oce1aneous
S500 $100 $600 I $780 Walt>" Uno Loop CIosI.res
SlbIoIaJ: SlbIoIaJ: $1 092
2015 $2(l() $40 $140 I $318 M1sce1aroeoos
StbIoIaI; StbIoIaI; $318
2016 S400 $IlO $460 I $648 WeI 32
~ $SOO $100 $600 I sal0 WOW line loop Closl.res
StbIctaI; S<bIotat $IL....
2017 S200 $40 $140 I $330 M1sce1arieoos
SU>!olal: SWtolat $3JO
2018 $2(l() $40 $240 I $336 M!s<:eIaneous
S500 $100 $600 I S840 Wlrler Une Loop Oostros
SLbIolaI: 5lbIOOlI; $1176
2019 S400 S&l S480 I J634 WeI 33
SLbIolaI: 5lbIOOlI; J634
2020 S200 s.co S240 I s:wl I I.llscelane<lus
$SOO $100 $600 T sa70 I Wrs.Ii:f Uno looo CIosLres
SWtolat I Slblolal; I $1.218
TOTAL: $'5,2:95
SJ,zTP
Tob/:
$/1,fll
(1) Assume inllalion ~ 2.5%
(2) All years in v.hich no major constnJctjon is planned a $200,000 miscellaneous nem
is shcMn to CO'<ef small capital elq), (telemetry, hydrants, chemical eQuipme1l1:. elc,)
(3) The well construction schedule is based on maintaining a ratio of approximately 1 well
to evefY 1000 to 1200 ERU,C92 v.hich is the current ratio,
CIP Schedule
LQft
APPENDIXtSB'
cip&cashfloy.projecion
ATER FEE CALCULATION SUMMARY
APPENDIX 68
?ago 1 0/' 1
@(RJdJ[S
$ 4,042,562
$
$ 4,042,562
$ 204
$ 2,690,675
$
$ 2,690,675
$ 136
$ 4,308,260
$
$ 4,308,260
Water DWribufion C' As$e.ssme Coo
2002 Distribution Replacement Cost less Depreciation:
Less Outstandi Bond Princi I:
Net Disl:ribl1Jion System Value:
alar Distribution System Capacity, ERU's:
2002 Water Distribution (City-Constructed) Charge per ERU:
fc~f-?>jiflhfIXt'.I~'J;
$
218
Total City-Constructed Assessment per ERU; $ 558
Oevelo Prov7ded Distribution S $/em ment Fee
2002 Developer-provide<l Distribution Replacement Cost Less Depi'e( $
Provide 50% ror replacement $
Collection System Capacity, ERU's: $
2002 Assessment Charge:
19,576,989
9,788,495
19,800
$
494
Subtotal: $
673
56%
1,062
Previous Collection System Charge per ERU: $
Percent Change:
Distribution m Develo Fee
(see file titled 'brnd_wlerrterprise't.vatet for calculations)
$
330
TOTAL WATER CHARGE: $
Total wfo System Development Fee: $
Previous Fee: $
Percent Increase:
1,382
1,052
704
49.4%
81912002
FEE SUMMARY.august
water fee
APPENDIX 6C
Page 1 of 1
Water System Cost & Depreciation
Current Year;
Current ENR-CCr:
2002
6500
SUBDMstONS
Fiscal Original Cost ENR-
Year Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Depreciation less Depredation
1973 $61,044 1895 $209,386 $34,290 $175,096
1976 $12,880 2401 $34,869 $6,577 $28,292
1978 $329,238 2776 H70,91O $153,726 $617,184
1979 $308,455 3003 $667,652 $137,965 $529,686
1980 $79,003 3237 $158,761 $33,892 $124,869
1981 $161,321 3535 $296,630 $66,880 $229,750
1982 $209,007 3825 $355,175 $83,600 $271 ,575
1983 $94,029 4066 $150,317 $35,738 $114,579
1984 $114,100 4146 $178.883 $40,776 $138,107
1985 $323,996 4195 $502,020 $110,160 $391,860
1986 $51,643 4295 $78.156 $16,331 $61 ,625
1987 $48,464 4406 $71,497 $13,270 $58,227
1988 $157,769 4519 $226,930 $42.257 $184,673
1989 $43,250 4615 $60,915 $10,380 $50,535
1990 $411,454 4732 $505,184 $96,413 $468,771
1991 $403,515 4835 $542,471 $67,159 $455,312
1992 $1,315,352 4985 $1,715,103 $262.645 $1,452,458
1993 $479,730 5210 $598,512 $77,442 $521 ,070
1994 $1,504,693 5406 $1,808,525 $217,132 $1,591 ,394
1995 $654,248 5471 $1,014,917 $105,464 $909,453
1996 $1,415,658 5620 $1,637,558 $148,054 $1,489,504
1997 $2,061,742 5825 $2,322,974 $166,230 $2,156,744
1998 $1,991,581 5920 $2,186,702 $128,718 $2,057,985
1999 $1,766,441 6053 $1,696,888 $72,392 $1,824,496
2000 $2,078,741 6221 $2.171 ,969 $51,876 $2,120,093
2001 $1 ,528,449 6342 $1,566,528 $10,886 $1,555,641
2002
Replacment
CumUlative Replacement Cost
,1--:----0 r--..
'DJ j L.~\ Ii
!~ [;If i.~.; i~J
'-' 0'lj;r
S"";j
I'
U
$17,826,003
$21,789,432
$2,210252
$19,579,161
CITY PROJECTS
Fiscal Original Cost ENR-
Year Capital Assats eel (a) Cost Depreciation less Depreciation
1977 $848,712 2576 $2,141,548 $408,961 $1 ,732,567 Tank, dislribtution
1983 $46,570 4066 $74,448 $14,903 $59,544
1987 $115,950 4406 $171,057 $30,147 $140,910 86 water extensions
1988 $0 4519 $0 $0 $0
1990 $0 4732 $0 $0 $0 Ten Mire Rd. Extension
1991 $0 4835 $0 $0 $0 WeU#12
1992 $136,766 4985 $178,331 $21,880 $156,450 Well #11 Fence, Wtr Dept. BldQ
1993 $3,420 5210 $4,267 $425 $3,641 Press Zone ehk Vlv Stat.
1994 $0 5408 $0 $0 $0 Telemetrv Svs, Well 14115, Mer. Greens Bstr Stat 2
1995 $3,406 5471 $4,047 $1,092 $2,955 Well No, 12 Rehab
1996 $16,404 5620 $18,973 $2,773 $16,200 Well No. 16
1997 $1'79,247 5825 $200,018 $16,940 $183,Q76 Under Road Water Exlansion
1998 $52,887 5920 $58,069 $3297 $54.772 Well NQ. 17
1999 $514,222 6060 $551,558 $22.298 $529,260 Well 19, 18, Ustick Reservoir
2000 $1,354,748 6221 $1,415,506 $33,452 $1,382,055 Well '20, Ustick Reservoir
2001 $45,631 6342 $46,768 $160 $46,607 Well 121
TOTAL DISTF $21,144,026
8/612002
Replacment
Cumulative Replacement Cost
$3,317,963
$4,664,588
$556,329 $4,306.260
$26,654,021
$2,766,580 $23,887,440
water asset 3umm,
FEE SUMMARY.3-8-02
81612002
Unit Cost Total Cost
$17.00 $198,220
$0,00 $0
$800.00 $24,000
$700.00 $21,000
$1,000.00 $9,000
$250 $3,750
Subtotal: $255,970
$38,396
$17,918
$56,313
$312.283
$46,843
Total: $359,126
Overall 8" Unit Cost $30.80 per lineal foot
Overall 12" Unit Cost $36.62 per lineal foot
Over-size Cost $5.82 per lineal foot
.Surface repair not nOl1l1alfy included in costs for internal water line since streets are
being constructed ror subdMsion.
WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEE CALCULATION
12" Section Line Water Main Cost Estimate
Use: 5300 LF (114 mile)
Item
12"PVC
Surface Repair
12" Gale Valve
12" Tee
Blowoff
Connect to Main
Quantity Unit Cost T olal Cost
5300 $24,00 $127,200
5300 $9,00 $47,700
7 $1,200.00 $8,400
2 $750.00 $1,500
1 $1 ,000.00 $1 ,000
1 250 $250
Subtotal: $186,050
15% $27,908
7% $13,024
Subtolal: $40,931
Construction Subtotal: $226,981
0.15 $34,047
Total: $261,028
Overall Unit Cost: $49
Miscellaneous
MobJPermrtslBonds
Engineering/Slaking
Area Benefitted by Section Line Water Main
Area = 640acf4=
0.2500 sq, mL
160 acres
320 acres
5300 LF
x 2 sides of line =
Water Trunk Length, Section Stroot
Section Line
Total Trunk
Length, It
5300
Water Trunk
Cost
per A/:;re
$815.71
Cost
$261 ,028
Area, A/:;
320
Net Development Density:
Water Trunk CostJERU for section-line mains:
2.5 ERUfacre
$326 per ERU
Internal (mid-section line) water trunks
Total water trunk length, east-west:
Total water trunk length, north-south:
Total Water Trunk Length:
"Meandering- Factor:
Actual Estimated Total Length:
5,300 lineal feet
5,300 lineal feet
10,600 lineal feel
1
11 ,660 lineal feet
Item
8"PVC
'Surface Repair
8" Gate Valve (1 per 400')
8" Tee (1 per 400')
Blowoff (1 per 1/4 mi)
Connect to Main (1 per 800')
Quantity
11 ,660
11,660
30
30
9
15
Miscellaneous
MobFPermrtslBonds
15%
7%
Engineering/Staking
Subtotal:
Construction Subtotal:
0,15
Over-size Cost per square mile:
No. of ERUfsq. ml.:
Over-size Cost per ERU:
Water Trunk CostIERU for section-line mains, from above:
Subtotal:
Program Admin @ 10%:
~ Water System Development Fee:
$406 ~
version 2
Without
Surface Repair
$127.200
$0
$8,400
$1,500
$1,000
$250
$138,350
$20,753
$9,685
$30,437
$168,787
$25,318
$194,106
$37
.":0 ~~-
fUJ .'t>""
,_:/ d
$67,905
1.600
$42.44
$326 per ERU
$369
$37
APPENDIX 60
Page 1 of 1
n--!
:::: :'::;;.1
II
water
I'-
X
o
z
W
0-
0..
<(
>-
.....
u
m:
a.
re:
()
~
;:
o
LL
"C
Q)
.....
U
Q)
.....
o
....
a..
a..
I-
~
N
Ol
LL
1------
t
!
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
i
I
i
i
I' , , , , , , , ,
''''''''
""""
''''''''
[7
I' ,
III III
,""" ""'" """""'"
~llllll 11111111 11111111 1111111
, ""'" """"",,"""'"
II
" ""'" ""'" ""'" "'"
CD
..--
o
N
......
..--
o
N
r-:
1111 11 III 1111111111
""'" ""'''''''' '"'''''''' "" ,
T7 l{)
e 11111 11 ..--
0
"''''','''''''' "",'" '" N
,
I II
"""" ""'" ""'" "
, / / (")
B II II 111111 III 11111111111 II ..--
0
I"'" , ""'" """',. " N
-
E I 1111
""'''' ""'" """'"
;t II III
F 11111
fll
, ~
,
I
,
j
I
I
1
J
!
i
I
I
i
i
I
i
i
I
I
i
0 0
0 0
0 cO
..--
""'" ""'" "",," ", ,
[7 TT7
It II
I"'" '\,,,,,......, '\."""..........""""""
!/77fTr;
II II
1'- " " " , , " , , , " , " , , , , , , , , , ...... , ....
I 1(7777777~/
IIlllll! 111111
" ""','" ''I. ""'"'','''
r;'" .rr7;r;r;,,: ..,.~'~7;
III III 1111 III II 1I111l II
,,' ,,""","" "" '"
,'.,.J J /., rJ<;.r /;
1111 11111
I' , , , , , , , , ''I. 'I.' , 'I.' '"
1111111111 11111111111 II
""'" """" 'I."'"
rr
" i
'III 111111 11111
I"~"~'"~ ""'" ""'"
. -
I
It III III
""" ""'" "",,',.
[7/
II III
" , , " "'''''' ""'"
C.I?7
II
"
,'" ""'''"' " "
II III II II
"""'," '"
III
I' """"""
III
" , , " " " " , , .... ,
I
",,"'", """"
E
'" "'""'"""'
III
I""""""
J
II
..--
..--
o
N
0 0 0 0 0
0 C! 0 0 9
CD -.;t N ci ,~-. .~. .,,'..u N
I
Q)
o
o
N
......
o
o
N
l{)
o
o
N
(")
o
o
N
..--
o
o
N
[
Q)
en
Q)
., .....
~
r-,r /l
oi
..-
I~'"
"
,
17l~
CD,
..,..-:". ."- '",
~
'(3
ro
0..
co
o
t/)
t/)
Q)
o
><
W
2:-
'(3
ro
0..
co
o
rn
3:
o
u::
U
0.>
U
Q)
B
'-
n.
lSl
I
Boise Municipal Code
E, Ownership Transferred and Maintenance Assumed by City
Upon City issuance of a certificate of final completion, the City shall
assume ownership and maintenance of the public sewer, However the
developer shall be responsible for correcting any defects that shall be
found or occur within the warranty period,
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/1511998)
Section 8-11-05.07 Financing Sewers
The costs of constructing sewer trunk and lateral lines shall be financed and paid
for as follows:
A, From the Sewage Works Fund created by this Chapter and as authorized
by the Council; or
B. By the creation of a local improvement district as provided by Chapter
17, Title 50, Idaho Code; or
C. By the property owners specially benefiUed by the construction of the
trunk and lateral sewer; or
D, By a combination of A, B, and C as in the judgement of the City Council
may be fair and equitable in consideration of the benefits accruing to the
property owners within the area in which the sewer trunk and lateral
lines will be constructed, as well as the financial condition of the City
and the property owners in the area.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/1511998)
Section 8-11-05.08 Extensions and Reimbursement Percentages
A. Construction
A user may, with prior approval of the City, finance and construct an
extension to the sewer system, if the extension is designed and
constructed in accordance with City standards.
B, Reimbursement
1.
The user may be reimbursed, as outlined below, for the
proportionate cost of the sewer benefitting adjacent or other
property by entering into a written agreement with the City if
any of the following apply:
a, The extension is located outside the user's property
(offsite) and provides sewer service to adjacent or other
property;
b, The extension is within the user's property (on site) and
is a gravity sewer larger than eight (8") in diameter;
c. The eight inch (8") diameter gravity sewer within the
user's property (onsite) is required by Public Works to
Page 18 of 52
Boise Mwticipal Code
be deeper than twelve (12) feet to serve upstream
properties.
d, The extension is a permanent lift station and/or force
mam; or
c. The extension is a temporary lift station and/or force
main which the City has required to be oversized in
order to accommodate an area larger than the
developer's property.
2. To be eligible for reimbursement, the user must, unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer, do the following:
a. Design the sewer facilities in accordance with the City
master sewer plan and receive City approval of the
sewer construction plans and specifications;
b. Construct sewers in accordance with the City approved
plans and specifications;
c. Receive three (3) bids for the sewer construction and
select the lowest responsive bid as determined in a
public bid opening; and
d. Receive preliminary plat approval from City Council for
the development being served by the sewer.
C. Amount of Reimbursement
]. Offsite Gravity Extensions
The amount of reimbursement owed to the user for offsite sewer
extensions shall be based upon actual construction costs and may
also include reasonable engineering and easement acquisition
costs approved by the City.
2. Onsite Gravity Extensions
The amount of reimbursement owed to the user of onsite
"oversizing or overdepth" line extensions shall be determined by
muHiplying the percentages listed below in tables, by the actual
construction costs for the various pipe sizes and depths required
for the project. Engineering costs for onsite oversizing and
overdepth sewer construction are not eligible for reimbursement.
a, Onsite Sewer Pipeline Reimbursement Percentage
Pipe Size (inches)
Page L9 of 52
Boise Municipnl Code
1',[><' X 10 12 15 IX 21 24 27 30 1(, .12
()crth
WI)
12 or 0% I ~ Kil'"tl 21 70/fJ 115% .14. l}~~1 51. JO~ll )I)))o/~ 6~9% (~X 6~/~ 7~ XQio ~~_.r.l{a
10"
l> (',1% 17.9". 2()_61~O 371% 47.,1"/" 551% 61 I"' 65,9% 695% 79.20/0 X)O%
/0
14 12-1% 2.3.9"/" 114% 40,6% 4<). 9~}~, 56.9%1 62,5% 66,9% 70,3';" 79. (,0/0 IIJ2%
15 17,6% 294"1., 159% 44.0% 52.4% 58.8% 63,9% 68.0% 71^2~/o 800% !l35%
16 22,7% 14,5% 40,2% 47.3% 54.7% 60,6% 65,]% 69,1% 72,1% !lO5% !l38%
17 27.4% 39,2% 44.1% 504% 570% 62,3% 66,6% 70.2% 73,0% 809% X4,1%
18 31.8% 43,6% 47,8% 53.3% 59,3% 64.0% 68,0% 7L3% 73.9% 813% 84.4%
19 33.8% 45,('% 49,6% 54,7% (,03% 601.9% 68,7% 71,8% 74,3% 81.6% 1\4,6%
20 359% 47,7% 5l.3% 56,2% (01.4% (,5,7% 69.3% 72.40;', 74,8% 81.X% X4,H%1
21 37.J,}o 49,6% 5),0% 57.6~~ 62,5% 66,6% 70,0% 73,0% 75,3'% !l2,1% X4,9%
22 39,8% 516% 547% 58,9% 63.6% 67.4% 70,7% 73,5% 75,7% 1\23% 1\5,1%
23 41.6% 5340/0 56.4% 60,)% 64,7% 6H,3O,/o 714% 74.1% 762% S2.6~~ 1\5,1%
24 434% 55 2g./c~ 579% 616% 657% (19. 2 o/u 72.1 ~'(I 7U% 76,7% 1\21\% 85, )~~
25 45.2~'u 570% 595% 62,9% (,(t.70'1' 70,()% 72J';~/Q 75.2% 77,2~;, 831% X57%
26 46,9% SS.7O/1) ('[,0% 64.2% 67,1\% 70.:>% 735% 75,S% 77.7% :>),4% ~5,9n/1)
27 48.5% 60.3% 62.4% 65,4% 68,8% 71.6% 74,2% 76.4% 7:>,1% 10.6% 86,1%
28 50,0"1., 618% 63,8% 666% 697% 72Aalc~ 74,8% 76.9% 7R6~~, Kl9~{, M().3~f(1
29 51.5% (,330;" 65,21t/Q 677% 707% 732% 75.5% 77,5% 7Q, l "i~ K4. 2O~ g6,Y%
30 53.0% 6'L~% 6(,,5% 6U% 71.6% 74. 0% 76,1% 79,0% 79,6% :>4,4% :>6.7'%
OnsilC Sewer Manhole Reimbursement Percentage
Pipe Size (inches)
l'lre Depth 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 36 42
IFn
I 2 or less 0"/. I 9"1. 47% 10.5% 15,7% 22,7% 2ll.7% 43,0% 46,9% 59,2% 637%
13 7,6% 9.5% 12,0% 17.4% 22,2% 2K7% 34.2% 47.4% 51.0"10 62,3% 66,5%
14 14,0% ! 5,90"; !S.3% 123.3% 27.7~/<l I 339'% 38,9% 5L2% 5,1.5% 65,0% 68,9%
Page 20 of 52
130isc Municipal Code
15 19(,% 2l.S% 23-7%1 2~,,1~.;, 12,CiQ/~ JK2%, ~2,9% 5-14% 575% 67.4% 7~.O~-~,
1(, 2.1,5O/u 264% 2Sjo/() _,~_<)o.~ _16.1'''/0 .~2,O%, 46. 5O/~ 57. 3~/u 602% (,9.4% 7~::-;"'/v
I7 2X,(}Q/" 30"X% H.7% 1("X% q()5% 455% 497% 59H:l)/1) 625% 71.2% 74 ~o/"
I~ 127% )4,6% 16.4% 4(H% 41 X% 41'.50/0 S2.4o/u 620% (,46% nx% 7511%
19 36.20/0 3:i, lOiU 39,11% 4J.S<!.~ '-1(".1'0..-1. 5121}i, 55,0% (~l.mu (,6.4% 74,2% 771%
20 39,3% 41.2% 42,11% 4(.:1% 49';% 53J,% 57"2% 65,11% 68.1% 75.5 % 7~,2%,
21 42,]% 44,0% 45,5% 4X,9% 51,X% 55,S% 59,2% 674% 69,6% 76"7% 793%
22 44,6% 46.5% 48,0% 51,2% 540% 579% 61.1% 68.9% 7l.0"1o 777% 80,2%
2J 46,,),,1. 48.8% 50.3% 533% 560% 59.7% 62"8% 70.J% 72.3% 78.7% 81.1%
24 49,]% 51.0% 52,3% 553% 57,9% 61.4% (,4,3% 71,5% 73.4% 79.6% 111.9%
25 51.0% 52.9% 54,2% 571% 595% 62.9% 6SX% 72,(,'Yu 74"5% 80.4% ~2l)o;"
2(, 52,11% 54,7% 56,0% 5117% 61. I t)/u 64,3~/~ 67.1% 7},7% 75.5% 81.2% XU%
27 54,5% 56.4% 57,('% 60,2~t 62jo/{1 657% 6113% 747% 76.4% 81.9% ~3_9O;c,
28 561% 511.0% 591% 617% (',39% 66 9Q/~ 69.4% 75.6% 772% 825% H4.4O'-;,
29 57,5% 59.4% 6O.6<l/[l- ('3ll% (}5. ! O/{l (,KO% 70.5% 7(,.4% 78,0% Kll~J{, XS {luu
JO 5K9% (,(),II% (>19% 6'L2~.1J (,{, .1% 69.1% 71.5% 77,2% 7KK% 83. 7% ~5j~"v
3, Perma nent Lift Station Extensions
The amount of reimbursement owed for the construction of a
pennanent lin station and/or force main shall be based upon
actual construction costs and may also include reasonable
enginccnng and landscapmg costs approved by the City,
4, Temporary Lin Station Ovcrsizing
The amount of reimbursement owed for installation of an
overSized temporary Ii n station and/or force main shall be
determined by estimating the cost of constructing a lift station
and force main to serve only the development, subtracted from
the actual construction costs incurred by the developeL
Engmeering costs for the design of the lift station and/or force
main arc not eligible for reimbursement.
(6030. ^mcndcd, 0 lIJO/200 I; 5877. RCJ1calcd & RCJ1laccd. 1211511998)
Section 8-11-05.09 Developer Agreements and Methods of Reimbursement
A written agreement, not to exceed ten (10) years, shall be prepared which provides for
reimbursement of the user's proportionate costs of sewer benefitting adjacent or other
property, Depending on the reimbursement amount owed to the user and the amount of
potential reimbursement credit, the agreement will include one or more of the following
reimbursement items in the order listed below, up to the reimbursement amount:
Page 21 or 52
Boise Municipal Code
A. The equivalent assessment fees owed or paid by the user as required under
subsection 8-11-06.03(D);
B. The inspection fees owed or paid by the user as required under subsection 8-11-
06.05(A);
C. The trunk cOlUlection fees paid by the user as required by subsection 8-11-
06,03(A);
D. Reimbursement of trunk connection fees and equivalent assessment fees
received by the City as others connect to the sewer from an area, downstream of
the user's property, mutually agreed upon by the City and the user; and
E. Reimbursement of trunk connection fees and equivalent assessment fees,
received by the City, as others connect to the sewer from an area, upstream ofthe
user's property, mutually agreed upon by the City and the user.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-05.10 Sewer Easement Acquisition Policies
In order to provide for a uniform and equitable treatment of property owners of
lands subject to Boise City sewer easement acquisition, and to adequately protect
the best interests of Boise City, the following policies are adopted as procedural
guides to be followed in sewer easement acquisition:
A. Define and map the proposed easement acquisition;
B. Research ownership or obtain a preliminary title policy for the property
to be included in the easement;
C. Provide each owner of property within the proposed easement a written
notice of the City's intent to acquire such easement;
D. Obtain an "opinion of value" or "appraisal" for the property proposed for
easement acquisition;
E" Offer the dollar amount stated in the "opinion of value" or "appraised
value" to the property owner for purposes of acquisition if the "opinion
of value" or "appraised value" is acceptable to the City;
F. Conduct good faith negotiations with the property Omler if the value
offered is rejected; and
G. Obtain a final settlement of the easement acquisition purchase or proceed
with condemnation action if appropriate,
(6030, Amended, 01/3012001; 5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12115/1998)
Section 8-11-05.11 Lift Stations
A. Designation of Lift Stations
Page 22 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
The Public Works Department shall designate a lift station as either
temporary or permanent, consistent with the Master Sewer Plan, at the
time such station is placed into service, The Public Works Commission
may, upon request when special circumstances exist, change the
designation of a lift station,
B. InstaUation of Temporary Lift Stations
Temporary lift stations may only be installed if the installation is in
accordance with public policy and approved by the Public Works
Department. The party installing the temporary lift station shall be
responsible for all construction costs and shall ensure that the temporary
lift station is completed in accordance with the requirements of the
Department. Ownership, maintenance and operation of the temporary
lift station shall transfer to Boise City at the time the temporary lift
station is accepted as operational by the Department.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-05.12 Food Disposal Vnits
A. Policy
It is the declared policy of the City to discourage and prevent discharge
of food wastes into the sanitary sewer system when such food wastes
could be disposed of in another roatUler. Where disposal of food wastes,
particularly by commercial and institutional users of the system is
allowed, the method and manner of such disposal shall be as required in
the subsequent portions of this Section.
B. Connection of Food Disposal V nits
Domestic and commercial food waste disposal units shall be connected
and trapped separately from any other fixture or compartment, except
that a continuous wastc with a flow directing partition will be acceptable
for domestic units. All units may have either automatic or hand-operated
water supply controls; however, domestic units shall be provided with an
approved inlet cover having watetway passages for use during grinding
operations.
C. No Discharge through a Grease Interceptor
No waste from a food waste grinder shall be discharged into or through a
grease interceptor.
D, Commercial Grinders
Commercial type food grinders shall be provided with not less than a two
inch (2") waste line. Each waste line shaH be trapped and vented as
provided in the Plumbing Code.
E, Food Waste Grinder Requirements
All food waste grinder equipment shall be designed to meet the
following requirements:
1. Particle size: 100 percent shall pass a No.2 screen (2-mesh);
Page 23 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
2. 95 percent shall pass a No, 4 screen (4-mesh);
3. Fibers shall not exceed two and one-half inches (2 1/2") 10
length;
4. Vegetable stems shall not exceed one inch (I U) in length, and
!eaf sections shall not exceed one-haJ finch (1/2 U) in the largest
dimension;
5, Equipment must be self scouring with no fouling surfaces to
cause objectionable odors, freed from electrical or mechanical
hazards, and of durable construction;
6, Such food waste grinders shall be installed under and in direct
connection with a sink or other approved receptacle, supplied
with water and discharged through a trap to a sanitary sewer
system.
F. InstaUation Requirements for Commercial Grinders
Waste grinders and their installation in restaurants, institutions, food
processing or storage plants, and similar operations shall meet the
requirements of this Ordinance, as well as the Plumbing Code of Boise
City. An installation will be permitted only upon the finding of the
Department of Public Works that other methods of disposal are not
feasible and that the City sewer system can properly handle the waste,
G, Food Waste Disposal Units Must Comply
The installation, operation, and maintenance of any equipment or method
to be used for food waste disposal units shall comply with all the
provisions of this Ordinance and the regulations of the Building,
Housing, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire Prevention
Ordinances of Boise City, and if there is any conflict between the
provisions of this Ordinance and the applicable Building, Housing,
Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire Prevention codes and
ordinances of the City, such codes and ordinances shall prevail over the
provision of this Ordinance.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, [2/15/[ 998)
Section 8-11-05.13 Grease Traps
Every building, structure, or premise used or occupied by any sewer user where
any commercial or industrial operations are conducted or permitted which result
in the discharge into the sewer system of any products, waste products or other
substances, matter or liquid in the manner and to the extent prohibited in this
Chapter shall be equipped with an adequate and suitable grease trap, filter or
other interception device installed in such a manner that the products, waste
products, or other substances, material or liquids herein set forth will nol flow
into or be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. The grease trap, filter or
other interceptor shall be adequately maintained and efficiently operated by such
Page 24 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
sewer user.
(5877, Repealed & Replaccd, 12115/1998)
Section 8-11-06 FEE AUTHORITY; CREDITS
(5877, Added, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-06.01 Annual Review for Fees
The fees imposed by this ordinance shall be reviewed annually and revised
periodically as required.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/1511998)
Section 8-11-06.02 When Connection Fees Are Due
Unless othetwise specified, the connection fees imposed by subsection 8- I 1-
06.03 must be paid prior to initiation of sewer service, change in use of a
property already connected to sewer, or any increase in the discharge levels of
flow.
(5877, Repealed & Replaccd, 12/1511998)
Section 8-11-06.03 Capital Fees
A. Trunk Connection Fees
A trunk connection fee shall be imposed upon every person initiating
sewer service, changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels of flow. The fee shall be based on values
typical of the discharger category, unless otherwise addressed by
separate contract.
Fees for a change in use or an increase in discharge levels are calculated
on an incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
B. Treatment Connection Fees
A treatment connection fee shall be imposed upon every person initiating
sewer service, changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels of flow, BOD, or TSS. The fee shall be
based upon flow, BOD, and TSS values typical of the discharger
category, unless otherwise addressed by separate contract. Fees for a
change in use or an increase in discharge levels are calculated on an
incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
A treatment plant connection fee using a fee structure that includes
ammonia-nitrogen (NIB-N) as a component may be charged if the City
determines, after reviewing the relationship between actual or anticipated
BOD and ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) discharges, that an atypical
discharge is or will be occurring. An atypical discharge will be
evaluated against the treatment system design and operating parameters.
(A rate system that includes ammonia-nitrogen will have a lower BOD
rate than a rate system that does not include ammonia-nitrogen.)
C. Southwest Interceptor Fees
An interceptor connection fee shall be imposed upon every person
Page 25 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
residing in that area within the Boise Area of Impact known as the
Southwest Community Planning Area who is initiating sewer service,
changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or increasing the
discharge levels of flow. This fec is imposed on persons in the
Southwest Community Planning Area in recognition of the unique
requirements and impact this area has on the Boisc City Sewer system.
This fee shall be based upon flow values typical of the discharger
category, unless otherwise addressed by separate contract. Fees for a
change in use or an increasc in discharge levels are calculated on an
incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
D. Equivalent Assessmcnt Fees
Any person initiating sewer service with the Boise City Sewer system
who has not otherwise paid for, or contributed proportionately toward,
the costs and expenscs of constructing a sewer adjacent to or passing
through the property, whethcr that be by the City, a local improvement
district, or a private developer, and who subsequently desires to connect
to the sewer system, shall be required to pay an additional connection
(equivalent assessment) fee computed as follows, unless otherwise
approved by the Public Works Commission:
I. For lots up to 86,000 square feet in area, the fee shall be
calculated on the basis of the area of the lot;
2. For single family flag lots whose area within [25 feet of the
assessable frontage is less than 6,000 square feet, or lots with no
assessable frontage, a minimum equivalent assessment will be
calculated based on a lot of less than 6,000 square feet.
3. For lots greater than 86,000 square feet in area, the fee shall be
calculated on the basis of the area of the lot fronting the sewer
within 125 feet of the frontage. However, in no case shall the
assessment be less than that for a lot of 86,000 square feet in
area;
4. For single family lots in excess of86,000 square feet in area, the
frontage for the property shall only be assessed on the side of the
property for which the sewer service is being provided. For all
other uscs the assessed frontage shall be calculated on each side
of the lot in which sewer is fronting the property, unless
otherwise waived by the Public Works Commission. However,
in no case shall the assessment bc less than that for a lot of
43,560 square feet in area;
5. Large lots which can legally be further subdivided in the future,
and which are not fully utilized by the existing development, will
only be charged for the improved area and/or logical boundary
of future subdivision/development, with a minimum equivalent
assessment fee equal for a lot of 43,560 square feet;
Page 26 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
6. The equivalcnt asscssment fee may be adjusted to reflect the
benefit rcccived by large, opcn space lots which have a low
impact on the scwcr systcm or othcr criteria as determined by the
Public Works Commission. When the equivalent assessment
fees for thesc propcrties create undue hardship, or fees for such
properties are inequitable in tile consideration of thc Public
Works Commission, the equivalcnt assessment fee shall be
calculated on single family dwelling equivalcnts. Thc fee for
properties complying with all the above criteria shall bc
calculated by multiplying the number of single family dwelling
equivalents (SFDE's), based on fixture unit count, by the
equivalent assessment amount for a lot of 43,560 square feet.
The total equivalent assessment shall not be less than the
assessment for a lot of86,OOO square feet.
The applicant may not avoid payment of this fee by requesting
connection to another sewer if, in the opinion of the Public Works
Department, the proposed service line is best capable of being connected
to the sewer which is subject to the assessment.
E. New Development Eight Inch Equivalency
For sewers constructed outside of a public right of way, an eight inch
equivalency fee shall be charged, based upon any or all ofthe following:
I. Relevant actual construction, engineering, and inspection costs
for other sewers constructed by the developer within the
development;
2. The actual construction and engineering, costs of the sewer on
which the assessment is due, updated by Engineering News
Record construction cost index; or
3. Any other relevant factors that may affect the amount of the
assessment
This fee shall be in addition to any other applicable assessment fee and
may be reduced by the Public Works Department to reflect additional
costs incurred by the developer to upgrade the sewer to current
standards.
F. Public Service Line Fee
A fee shall be charged for each public service line provided by the City,
based on the size of the service line.
G. Change of Use
Any person changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels of flow, BOD, or TSS, shall pay trunk,
Page 27 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
treatment, and southwest interceptor fees. These fees will be based on
the difference in flows and waste strengths applicable to the property
change in use, or increased levels of discharge, less the nows and waste
strengths applicable to the most intensive original sewer use at the
property within the past ten (10) years. If for example, a single family
residence served by sewer is demolished and rcplaced with a restaurant,
the fees will be based on the difference between the typical Oows and
waste strengths for a restaurant and typical Oows and waste strengths for
a residence.
H. Prepayment of Connection Fees
Any owner of an existing single family residence within Boise City and
the Boise Area of Impact, to which Boise City Sewer system service is
unavailable, may prepay the connection fees required by this Section at
the rates in effect at the time of prepayment, subject to the following
conditions:
t. The property for which connection fees are being prepaid must
have an existing single family residence constructed on it;
2. The property owner wit! be required to enter into an agreement
with the City of Boise which shall absolve the City of any
requirement to provide sewer service to the property. This
agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Ada County
Recorder;
3. A reasonable administrative fee shall be paid upon execution of
the prepayment agreement to cover set-up, monitoring, and
recording fees and costs;
4. The connection fees paid to the City prior to the provision of
wastewater system service shall be paid prior to the date on
which sewer becomes available; and
5. Any connection fees paid to the City prior to the provision of
wastewater system servlce shall be in cash and shall be non-
refundable. The deferral of connection fees as provided for in
Section 8-11-08 shall not be available to property owners
electing to prepay connection fees.
L Sewer Deposit for Future Connection of a New Subdivision
If a wet sewer is not adjacent to a subdivision or development of land in
which the Council has required, as a condition for approving the
subdivision plat or development, construction and installation of a wet-
line sewer served by an interim treatment system in accordance with
detailed plans and specifications receiving prior approval, the subdivider
or developer shall pay a deposit to the Treasurer of Boise City. This
deposit shall be paid prior to the certification of the plat by the City
Engineer, for the future connection of the sewer or interim treatment
Page 28 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
system to the wct sewer subsequently constructed and installed adjacent
and adjoining the subdivision or development of land. The moncy so
paid shall be deposited to the Sewage Works Fund to be used for thc
purposes provided in subsection 8-11-01.08 of this Ordin~nce.
J. Temporary Lift Station Upgrade Fcc
Iftbe Public Works Department has approved the use ofa temporary till
station to serve a proposed development and if the lift station is
undersized to serve the geographical area which may contribute flow to
the temporary lift station, the City Council may, as a condition of
approving the subdivision or development plat, require the developer to
pay a fec for upgrading of the lift station and/or permanently extending
the sewer to serve the development if it is needed prior to the logical
extension of the gravity scwer. This fee shall be deposited to the Sewage
Works Fund. In the event these funds are not needed for the upgrade of
the lift station, the funds will be returned without interest to the
developer making payment.
(6046, Amended, 041101200 [; 6030, Amended, 01130/2001; 5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/(511998)
Section 8-11-06.04 Operation and Maintenance Fees
A. Service Charges and Fees
This provision shall establish a system of periodic service charges and fecs for
the purpose of equitably imposing upon all users the costs and expenses of
operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the wastewater system. The
service charges and fees shall be based upon (I) the volume and content of
effluent discharged into the wastewater system of the City, and (2) the costs and
expenses of operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the wastewater
system, such charges and fees having been determined to be the benefit derived
by each building, structure, or user being charged. The system of periodic
service charges and fees shall consist of the following categories: Facility
Replacement, Operation and Maintcnance, and Fixed Charge for Zero Use.
I. Facility Replacement
The purpose of this catcgory is to accumulate a reserve for replaccment
of the wastewater system. This reserve shall be based on the total
historical costs for the applicable facilities and equipment.
2. Operation and Maintenance
The purpose of this category is to recover, equitably from all users, the
costs and expcnses incurred by the City of Boise in operating and
maintaining the wastewater system.
3. Fixed Charge for Zero Use
The purpose of this category is to equitably apportion among all
customers a portion of those fixed costs which continue to be incurred
whether or not individual customers utilize the wastewater system. Such
costs include, but are not limited to, costs attributable to providing basic
office staff for the administration of the Boise City Sewer system.
Paymcnt of these eosts shall be made by all customers, including those
Page 29 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
with zero flow discharge.
B. When Payment is Due
Service charges and fees imposed pursuant to this Section shall be received by
the City by the due date shown on the invoice or billing statement.
C. Deposits
Deposits arc not required for new service unless the user:
1. is rated as a poor credit risk by a reputable credit bureau;
2. has had an overdue bill three (3) times with any utility in the past
four (4) years;
3. has supplied false information at the time of application for service;
or
4. has filed for bankruptcy.
A deposit for residential service shall be cqual to three months worth of
estimated charges. A deposit for commercial service shall be equal to two
months worth of estimated charges. The deposit will be refunded or credited
when the user no longer requires service or has paid all bills satisfactorily for
twenty-four (24) consecutive months.
Instead of paying a deposit, user may receive service if someone else signs a
guarantee for his bill. This person, called the "guarantor" must be rated as a
good credit risk by a reputable credit bureau. The guarantor is responsible for an
amount equal to the deposit, but will be released from this obligation after
twenty-four (24) consecutive months of satisfactory payments have been made
by the user.
D. Unmonitored Connections
The monthly sewer service charge or fee for each property owner whose
connection to the wastewater system is unmonitored shall be based upon
the winter water use of such owner or user, plus the fixed charge for zero
use.
~E. Monitored Connections
The monthly service charge or fee for each sewer user whose connection
to the wastewater system is monitored shall be established by the Public
Works Department based upon (I) flow, (2) the concentration of BOD,
(3) the concentration of TSS, (4) other special constituents that may
require treatment, and (5) the fixed charge for zero use, and in
accordance with monitored waste charges, unless otherwise specified by
a separate contract.
If the City determines by reviewing the relationship between actual or
anticipated BOD and ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) discharges that an
Page 30 of 52
July 19,2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 23, 2002
APPLICANT Public Works Department -- Brad Watson
REQUEST Wastewater Pretreatment Program Fees:
ITEM NO.
4-C-2
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER;
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
r lye
8~~~~
rov
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented of public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Me
To: Mayor and CitY Council
From: Brad Watson, P.E.
CC: File, Gary Smith, John Shawcroft
Date: 7/23/2002
Re: Wastewater Pre-treatment Program - Proposed Fees
The documents accompanying this memo provide information for Agenda Item #4.8 at
tonight's Council meeting.
A new wastewater pretreatment ordinance was adopted in January of 2001 (Title 9, Chapter
2). That ordinance provides for the establishment of fees to compensate the City for costs
associated with monitoring, inspection, surveillance and laboratory analysis as well as
recovery of those costs for non-complying users. A copy of section 12 of Chapter 2 is
attached.
Copies of the proposed pretreatment fee schedule and draft resolution are attached.
Celeste Vialet, Pretreatement Manager, and r will be at the Council meeting tonight to further
discuss the proposed fees and answer any questions you may have.
Thank you
/~~
From th.: &"'-;1( of
Unod Wabon. r.E.
City Englt1<...."
~'lcridian Public Works [x:partm..'fII
660 E. WatCl1OwL....!.anc. SUllll 200
~kridi31L Idaho 8J(,42
lIP Page 1
(208J 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887.1197
WatSOllb(~.mcridian.td us
9-2-12: FEES:
A. Purpose: It is the purpose of this Section to provide for the payment of fees from users to the
City's wastewater disposal system to compensate the City for their costs associated with
monitoring, inspection, surveillance and laboratory analysis required by the Federal
pretreatment program
B. Charges And Fees: If costs are incurred beyond normal operation through involvement with
noncomplying users, the Public Works Department will charge the noncomplying user for
monitoring, laboratory analyses, inspections and surveillance as required by Federal
pretreatment requirements and this Chapter. (Ord. 697, 3-7-1995)
Proposed Pretreatment Fees
July 2002
Plan Review & Final Inspection:
. Pretreatment Application Fee-
New Commercial Construction
(other than shell construction)
$150.00
. Commercial Pretreatment Application Fee
Tenant Improvement for Shell
$150.00
· Follow -up Inspection Fee $42.50 per inspection
o After N.OV. (Notice of Violation) of their preset scheduled pumping time has
been issued, they have 5 working days to pump out grease interceptor.
SamplinQ Fee: $85.00
Includes cost of labor, use of sampler, supplies, plus cost of independent lab analysis.
This includes 2 trips= 5 labor hours.
Surveillance: $42.50 per hour
Monitoring of an entity found in violation with probable cause.
PLUS: Laboratory (at actual billed cost of independent lab analysis)
"'Fees derived from hourly rate of personnel plus benefits.
Permits
· SIU - (Significant Industrial User) 5 years (unless otherwise specified)
$500.00 and up depending on complexity
and time requirements.
o Applicant must sign acknowledgement of permit during building application.
All fees will be paid to the Building Department prior to Certificate of
Occupancy is issued for the completed permit.
. MIU - (Minor Industrial User)
Review Need for Permit every 3 years.
Fees are dependent upon investigational
requirement.
. Septage Hauler Permit
$50.00 per calendar year. .,Renewable with
truck inspection and current Central District
Health Permit.
All costs are based on the followinq charqes:
Vehicle -
Personnel -
Misc. Equipment -
$25.001 hour
$17.341 hour based on $3K1mnth
$10.001 day Samplers
IZF<.,(lL [ I [()'.." f\.n,
\\ \'-, I L\\' \ J I.H l'IU, flU".\. 1\11" I
[) y
.'\ RESOLl.'TIO:--': or HIE cr rv COl,:\.IC1L OF THE C:( fV OF \lFIUDJA:'-.
PLJRSlJ:-\:\T TO Tf IE WASTE\\'r\TEH. PRE I"IZEA L\tlE;--.JT ORDlf\.'.-\\:C:E AT
CHAPTE1~ ~ dr TI rLE 9 or THE MUUDIAJ-": CfTY CODE OF '[I [f CITY or
MEH.lOrAi' ESTAB.USIHN(; FEES
Sl:Cr!O!\.'
\VI [LlU..\~ ['It' ( '.", C:'~;:h" 1"1.:.
J I
I~ t) :l~.:..e"".L!I,.- tu l'$t~Lhil~~' \~~.::..IL~ !."t:'" I.u :-t.:Ir.<H~:-"~ :~~C \V{L~L_.\\-:lti'..-r ~)"P~I ~:IIl. :c ~I
f~;<... a:ld :=:".i-'en~("... :rh.~I~'IL:d ::, ~h~~lPnl.;:l'nn{r :l.nJ (':'Ii".ri.'~f'..~ ~h(' C'.', ~ '.\ :1~iC;;.lt~.
f ,:,~~:t I".,-,~~...:. :"' ~ ( ): l ~:~ 1~l: 'l.^:'" .1~1~: L~~I~)~~.. :1~__dt' s: :'~1..' .:rh! r\.',~i;,.':.~I: ....;Z,.~~l.r ~.~I: ,01; I ~ .,: 'l:
[ It't:;\ ',j.',::I., It.t ~h: {.,I', :,,' \L"Jt,ln, rci:']~.. i ,. ,,:'.1., ;',J.'.IL Il"',ll': ",
~:, \,'.("\". .Jf IPt~P(.-\: ~~'l':~ t.... :-.(~ ...il_~:.L','i,.t '1\ '~h: \\':It.;L"",~,~.. :)t:'~"~1"."'"l"11. i!l.~
i I,..: (.I'V f..{J,..lt:.'d l'. hi." ("'I:'~ I' \ll..~IJ!~:\ ~(~Ll.. .~.~. 1.L'iC:~~' l~ '.: 'I:,~' '.,,:l~ ICl" ~Sll
J1(''::::-.~ilr\' 10.'11 :....:-~...l.I\:.1~l(,.: I iii' ~~.d:,:. t)(,cl.-t' r~r\.; :>r\'eo'. I'd ~:lt. ..'~:L~(::" r 'ja (
(.~ \ k::<I .H~
BI', [T RE....;Cll \ 1'1 ) BY HIE 1'\1.-\ \'UI~ !\:c..J U <.Ol'l'-':U! 01: l'H I. (( T\" or ;\l1;lU [) 1\:'-.
! I )AIIl )
: 'Ie. (d'.'" \. ".I::.C': .~~~~~.. h''=Ic'I_l\ l,.....!:dL .;1 :1,:,; tt....I(I\. ~~: Il't"':. tr.._ ..' 'I
\. I'.I,:".J~-~ c: ::.e ( t /.. \\'11'\1. ".\ i't:- ,.,1," l.l(:tlC:l: I ~:.llr ,1:.....(
" I' 1 t.e
'. ::l:t'..il!~ {'Jil \r"~:I~.H~EJ:l :~:.. .,Ot'....' i_. :J'll:~h: '::
I, ::1 :;l~.h t . If1, 'J:=-~,.: ~:1.1-'. ...h.dl ':'~I~~~:-LhH.~
. ,I ,r; ~ 'l ,
b
\~+ }Il'":~l-.r ':l.d IJ"'\'~:"';I:rl_,,-:" ~J..'~l~~...".1:'{lr' :--~-.,' . CI~~lr:'
I'll;' .....'.f.I<'l:1 F";r 1':',"1":1,1: :--:x., .;,'1','-\:,("', l;t.1 .:;!~,',
'.
J!'
t.,!!....,.,,;, In.p~..::I')I: l~~ I';'f lll"~f:q:\(:f: \ ':I':-.l:lL~')' l~"t" ," .' ,I, L1,'~ ,1,[,:,'1' H
H t..:~H_,r~ Int:~Zt~ !~1Sp':l.'~J"I;1 '~:',- ":';'.~\r.rL'l~'i1...~:... 'I: ::..:i
J:'J~:-:[~c'l: L~-:.:"rCrr~'.I:H~S i:.J{ ~I' ::\(~':'...''''';'','r '.J~.II"'; _~::J ,jr r;.l~~... ::ltJ~r
~)J,.i1 P~l~)?';"."J t:'.d 1':~',HH.d ::1 ..~...:c~ T; ._/\~.'li~' . ....:-:qt lJt~~. ~L' .l~~ lO,t'
Cll.;.... \\ .t,,~~:\\.Ll:~: :)'^("':~LI.:ll('n' t'r~f~~:.)~"..:~ ~:~... ~":' .,r If I r 'I.
1....4,..i>t. ....u.tUI'::'l.g -ilL" ,1.{........_~:.tCL '::.:J' ... :d.J r' l~:"-" ..\:I~ ~."
:L .-:fl...j ~I~tl; '~,Jh.t 1I'(e;(~~l.f ~ ".~'., ["\ .~:.' I. .1....1" Jj". .. h~' f".; "; ,'.:
.:l.]',.~ ..'il'~ll'\'''': ~\:.t'.l :1\' " -.-. r'::l~ : .....:1 ~:~-_ \".'L'. :J II~'"''
~: Ir":.'~~l"'J>~'. :h~~ "~...:.:'.q I' ~:.U' j ,~I .:" 'r.'~I". .'~'.'~:1'~ .~'l':l
I'\~i:~,;~,~,j 'l~' I.. ~1:"'.L1 :.:,~. ~~I"" l~'..........',E ;11 I:." t..,~ I:..f~l.l'...d ~".'::':2' .h::
1~.. ~~I: I:l'- \: t). ~..,tl_!\ :.~ll' ~JI' . .~' ~ 'll.,': .:. II~ ;.:1 .t.
..... '\.;:'('::"I~l'~ :"'-l:~I:~', .... I c', :'<. . ';1 .1."" 'fit
f" ,',
.' . ; It
(~L'-,OLL. r[( I'\;
"j /oj"' I I:' .1.)
r ( ) H f-' f.' I II t ^ "J W II ~ i n: '\,1 J\ I f-' ,':
f' H n ~l .' N H ~ \ ~ ! . I 1 1 'I ; ,
f /I .
"\~:.:h'fJl :1:. ..\';I~":'I 'f ::1 ',1\' I:tt' .:~I '.L.~'.~' I \.!.J '~:'I:.~
; r.IF' .n' 1,("<::. :'~;:"r<:,l~ncj ~k"IC"
,:>.Il1\;lLi:~: r..::'
1,IJl.:.l, :II:...~ ('.1\[ ....: l:~t' ;u....it.~p("~'\~h"t-~I. I'~' ~..', 1', : ~ d' ...::..
'" ..: -, I <~
\101\11..; IllS fl"
I'!l;~ lht' C,)\I'~,1 lill' 'l1dc~'L":1~k:~; ,L'.(:;:,:, I', ""\.11-. ,],
s. ' \ I I ~ J : I. ~ r ..j. ~
Lmcr~l'nc\' lncldcn 1 Fe::
Plus S65 00 per l10ur ;~rl<:r rhe' fir\c i0\:1 -I' 11"UI'~. plu~
all v acljlu.)n~lI I)U 1 of PC'Cb":l ,,-,<:[ \ :ndCpl'l\,iem labol :ll(>IY
analys~., c/)~[S l're, lIlL'UrreG :.I,' .J rC:iu:r "j ',lid ClllCrgcn..:Y
lll(ltkfll
S:'"IJ (,.,-,
.
'\fln,:"l :)Cpl.agt: J I,wler I'cmllf ICc
S )(i(/() 1"':1 " __,I'
Slgni riun~ r nd il~mal User I sa h. t'('l::~ ~::.J11 be 11':gDlriJ ~nJ
wi rh t 11l' L:ser dnd ,... rinen InL0 the .lpplic,1bi<: I'rf.:t:c,l;mcn;
p:=nl1ll
SECTION~: nm cniorCClllcnt policy:, r](); ilHc~~Jc~: :I',r j{,." i :,r::Liu,k .my I)th<:t ::l~"I'~;:
,'nrt)fCCll1.::nt actwns :\ppropn;n..: under ~hl' ll!ji[\G1nt'~ [" 1:11" :';).,';, pr"c'''::1~,'d ;,\, Lilt: r!,.,n'L~ln'Jl] :II!: ',1',CI
I'.\C-;SED BY'; i Ie Cl i"Y COLt-.:ClL (lr THE crTY ()). :-'lEiU:.l,..\f< II ),\HI)
~\Jni
"':hl-;
(!il\- t~~
t\l'l'RO\'EO gy TI :~'. .\1.-\.'((* OF ['HE Cl 1'1' 0:= .'.:Ut::)I.\':, I[).\i-;(l. (;1.,
_ __ . _ _. ..._..____~ ____ ~ .' ~()(l:
d,l'. I':
fh
\-bVvl !~l.,:l.:r, I) l :')fl H'
.'\ ITb 1
(;1(\' Citric:
~'I\t; I~ \\'\'D~I.'''''~'..'.1-:p,.:hJ.I...~...i..r;.J'I:~ .l. '~":-:\~'~o;"H w ..}'.~ ~.I. H-l'1 ..'i:or.I-..... ..i-~c\'JI.("L~.rt:'.1': I ;1-:;' ....I~.
ftESOLUTlO:--.J - '}
tn 19 fl? lfi:411
TO: H f. f1 [ (1 I AtJ W A ~i T t: w ^ I!-: H
F IW N ' ;.' N 1-: n fl1! I I 'I : ~
(0
(]E
G
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITV r:i r-:R K nr=r-!(:F
To: Mayor and Cit)1 Council
From: Brad Watson, P.E.
cc: File, Gary Smith, John Shawcroft
Date: 7/23/2002
Re: Wastewater Pre-treatment Program - Proposed Fees
The documents accompanying this memo provide information for Agenda Item #4.B at
tonight's Council meeting.
A new wastewater pretreatment ordinance was adopted in January of 2001 (Title 9, Chapter
2). That ordinance provides for the establishment of fees to compensate the City for costs
associated with monitoring, inspection, surveillance and laboratory analysis as well as
recovery of those costs for non-complying users. A copy of section 12 of Chapter 2 is
attached.
Copies of the proposed pretreatment fee schedule and draft resolution are attached.
Celeste Vialet, Pretreatement Manager, and I will be at the Council meeting tonight to further
discuss the proposed fees and answer any questions you may have.
Thank you
;5A
From the desk of . .
Ilrnd Watson, P.E..
City Engil1t..'I.'f
Meridian Public Works [A'I);lrtm..'nt
G60 E. WatL'ftowcr Lane, Suite 200
McridiaJL Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898- 5 500
Fax: (208) 887.[297
watsoobLd!ci.rt1L,;dian. id\l';
9-2-12: FEES:
A. Purpose: It is the purpose of this Section to provide for the payment of fees from users to the
City's wastewater disposal system to compensate the City for their costs associated with
monitoring, inspection, surveillance and laboratory analysis required by the Federal
pretreatment program.
B. Charges And Fees: If costs are incurred beyond normal operation through involvement with
noncomplying users, .the Public Works Department will charge the noncomplying user for
monitoring, laboratory analyses, inspections and surveillance as required by Federal
pretreatment requirements and this Chapter. (Ord. 697, 3-7-1995)
Proposed Pretreatment Fees
July 2002
Plan Review & Final Inspection:
. Pretreatment Application Fee-
New Commercial Construction
(other than shell construction)
$150.00
o Commercial Preireatment Application Fee
Tenant Improvement for Shell
$150.00
· Follow -up Inspection Fee $42.50 per inspection
o After N.O.v. (Notice of Violation) of their preset scheduled pumping time has
been issued, they have 5 working days to pump out grease interceptor.
Samplinq Fee: $85.00
Includes cost of labor, use of sampler, supplies, plus cost of independent lab analysis.
This includes 2 trips= 5 labor hours.
Surveillance: $42.50 per hour
Monitoring of an entity found in violation with probable cause.
PLUS: Laboratory (at actual billed cost of independent lab analysis)
*Fees derived from hourly rate of personnel plus benefits.
Permits
· SIU - (Significant Industrial User) 5 years (unless otherwise specified)
$500.00 and up depending on complexity
and time requirements.
o Applicant must sign acknowledgement of permit during building application.
All fees will be paid to the Building Department prior to Certificate of
Occupancy is issued for the completed permit.
. MIU - (Minor Industrial User)
Review Need for Permit every 3 years.
Fees are dependent upon investigational
requirement.
. Septage Hauler Permit
$50.00 per calendar year. -.Renewable with
truck inspection and current Central District
Health Permit.
All costs are based on the followino charoes:
Vehicle -
Personnel -
Misc. Equipment -
$25.00/ hour
$17.34/ hour based on $3K1mnth
$10.00/ day Samplers
("). !
RF ~Oll:'I 10"-: l'.O,
\\ ,\S n:\\',-\I ER PRLTRE.-\ r.\ 1 f- '<T
BY
A RESOLLTIOl\' OF THE CITY COGNC1L OF THE CrTY 0[: \lFIUDlA:-:
PUR5UA",\'T TO Tf-'IE vVASTE\Vi\TER PRETREATtvlENT Olu)[f\:.-\~CE AT
CHAPTEl~ 2 0f TITLE 9 OF THE l\'IERIDIAJ':--' CITY CODE OF '[1[[: CrTY Of
MEIUOrAl\' ESTABUSHfNG FEES,
SI:CTIOi','
WI (EIt[A~ the em' Cuu:ki! rl:1d;
I I
Ill> llc':"t"~;ll\' to e,<;lJ.bllsh CCl~;111\ 1'L'C\ to rt:lrr,:JlJ:'~ ~hc \V;lSlc:\\alt'f :kp:llt!lIL"" i'l
('("IS and e:-"i-'cll"CS ilk'uned ifi J.dm1fHSlcnng ancl ..::!lfor(lll~ the C,''. '''\~I,r('''''',II(:
Ji~.('!.:.1 (':1(n:~'nt ()rd lllancc. ai\(j .J;);1! 1(.:iDle 5: :t:~ (lr1\\ r l'dL'ra: R::~l.:;l ~.' I; 1-:;' ,::~d
.!. .r;\r c.~,~\- (~(iU:h'-~. [()1 ~hc C~I\ Cd' ,\lerljlan. Jli;th,_~_ i'~~, t~..:<.J ,.1 :l:.J,I~h.. IC.l:.rH.: -c.
I~."\o:(\\' i1f:)PO;l'd j('l':~ tll l:..e :".('J~.gL'd :)\" the \\.~i'('R',.\,J::~: ~)(:t.'d:-:.\.'('n- ~!l.~
) 1"11,' Clev (j;un,'1! ut r,hl' CIl\' '01 \.k:IJIa.n, IdJilc, ;1,~': d"le:;~',I\',: -1\..' <old 1(',> ;",
nl":~:j5~-tr\' f')1" ~)~.'.,"rV3.:J(,11 {:. rht I".,.tir:' .1C~l~e (.r j )",,-C"\. ,~~I "~H' -'rIT'l.~" f' tl'l" C "
:- . "'- '\,- -.......-.. .. I~t L.", t' ,..... ~ '..... " ',_ '.' _ ....-l l '. ." ' ,. +
e>t \ k:',li!,tr:.
Bl: f T lLE<.;()1 V!'.I) l) Y Tl(E I'vlA Y()R :\N I) COt)NClL OF TH l. C IT)' ()F ;\'1 U~ I [) I '\..:'--..
IDAHO
:!w l.;~~: Cl':1Z1<.;JI :ll)," h~rc'l;\ 1,,,,l:oIl',:llh~ tG,II'\'.C:ig J"~l'" II: 1...... Joe, 'I,';'" \11.1 'Ii"
y,)'d;,",I:\ en :!:c: ('It':' \\"Li,Jc'\\UC:' l'rCr:C:,I:nt:": I f:Jlr';I::~"
.1
;':l'Ue..lUl:<'IH '\f';:h.,IUU:; ~;C~'"\l'W '~.,)'ll;:I",':\l:
\.-,):l"l;~tCl!{jn. ,.Ith,-\r than \hcll .:1.....n~~n.J(.l(;:'.
',I ,( It'll
I'
t~~~n~:;I'~r:i.11 rJ:-\.I:~l'~I~n:l.:~t !\p~)~H.:"uor ;':;.~:-: c:n)!~+
I ~n; ~~',:\'~~r~ Ic."El F,)r PrC'."H.IU;;h' ';-"!~l'.. l.I)~' V "l~...{ ~i~'~'1 l-~l; I .: if"!..~l
S ',:,,)\,
1,.lll,,'A'up (n,pt?-.:rl')f\ r~e For In:~r,:c::p[:l: \ ,HI;:'; ,t;\d'j: I ~."." ,~ L .II L)l'~ I I;'f'~' 'I' :.
It upon ll\l::;:.i ln~p':cU(ln. lhee .s'J!)"n.il,:,d"l:: 0,: t:,;
j~:d;n~t llt~rcrrn~nes trLd ll~ ::1 (l"i. r",-",:", [': 'II"' \3.~dt~ d!~d ,)( rr.1r\,) ;:I,Jsr
!'l' pumped :lI:J 'lolled 1:1 .<dCi U ,;!'c.W\ ,,::":II':I:H\L I'. !Lr, l>t'
l1l\-"'" \V~t~le\\J!Cr P~.l.:rC~\rnl{'n:, ()rc!!r:J:-'':-::. ~h,,-' ;\r:'~',lr ~,r I t. :1 ~
C:-i;...:i;:.l: .....L'IlrilI!1:ng the- inc~'r""''"~~.'t0i'' \'.111~'~,'" ~\P,J'j.>: 'I;~P'" '.\.:11 :~('- ,
li.l,rlt_j d:a, ,'dlel Inte:..:,,!';' ~ ':,i'.'.r., .1:. :' . '1.'," 11",." Iw I",; \';",,;:
l.tl~..i a::.i(.ill~l'G '\\.:'..h~ \ j"l'..{_" )1 '~'..f:'l!I"; :,1'.':' :,_" 1:1~ ":++1,., :1 q~: .~.
l"'lrl~'>~"l"L.',I"" .JI.... 'l~~l'. ....)! I' .> 1.1- \ ',I ,.."r ',1')' ~"I r r, ',' ",.,"1
'- ": '. _' '. ~ _ .. L .._ ':. ~ ' '4'. , .. . ... ,. ~ __ . _' . .
~""Iua~t"!'':W :IT>J ,kal':"',,,l. lOr :::.s~~"':"':'_I)n r~.,--, l;'~ 1.~':LH<..;d r~......r::n' ..1;.1,.
~~: ~~~~;: ;\~~;::h\~:\ ;'"d' !' ~:'~\~'l,;":I~'n~::': ~:\,' " 'i,ll," : ;'~,' I." _ :: ,'~ \1:,
ltr:-;OLl, f[():---'; ,
! 'j fJ:' I (, : .1 '1
T () ; ~i f n I [) I At,} \'J A ~j n: WAr !': Ii
F Ii () ~1 ',' (H~ ~l H; \ I I 'I: (
I (l ,
~!~"'L('rn:q1t' '.\'!i~_.t;l,.r !~~ :;l.t-' rilt' :;.u'.';(~"~..:, ,. \ ~Ll,.' j~-L:_ ;.~.
tL-1ib h..i\-t' bceL p~:n\r'r.:ll .~IH; ...:1c,uh"'J
::>amplJng F~r:
PfU~ thl" tl)~t (.~{ the ~Hdcpr'n"it':l. .I.~' l~~l'~ I', ~ 1 Ji'. ~:\
j ,S:; lltl
\10J\HI.,llllg F<:~
f)h.:s the C(J~t 1)1[11(: IJldeF'I'il~kil: 1,1:~(:~J:"IY :"\.1h',I'.
S 1\" I)(J l"~r j'"
Emergency I i\Cldent fce,
Plus 56500 per hour <trter tht' fIr~l 10t:: -j' ')IIlIlS, plu,
any addnj,)nal nUl or pockcl V,SIS tnlkrt:i\,1ellll.1boLlTOI"\"
analvs!s COSts cre, Jf1cum::d a, :l result (;1 s,lId <:n1crg,cll>:\'
illcillcnl '-
S2/,O 00
.
Annual SeptJlge J lJ.uler ['emll! rec
S 50.nO IKt " ..\1'
Significant Indllsmal User (Sill ~, Ie\:, ...klll be 1it:b\Jllil:nj
with Ihl: L:ser ane! written In(() the "ppl1c.,b!c I'n.:tlC,ltmc:nr
pennll.
SECTION 2; nus enforcement pnltc~' l~ nm II1ICilde(: ~1 ',1' Jo<, I; :'r~Llujc :lny olh<':1 !J.\y['u;
cni'.lf(Cm<.:nt :l.clwns approprial<': under ~he LldinaIlL"<: W L.tt' "'K" pr".sc:nt('d !IV the f1'"Jn-<.:ompl:illll \.1'0.:1
I'.\SSED BY "II IE CITY COU"':CIL 01-" THe CiTY Of- .\IEIU Ui:\t.... 11),\HU. ,IllS
::!OOI
day" '
,\PPRO\"EIJ I)'{ THE \lAY(;R OF THE cr !"Y OF .\lH..;ULi'<. ][).\H(r. tll;,
, ~()\J:
d.1\ \'~
[1\'
~--~~--,-
.\-1a Vl, r r~c, [It'[ [ D C'JJlll'
.'\ l'rES I.
CI t\' Cltrk
l'\\_~~: ,\,\'o:I~'r-.~.:~I"::llj'Jll.\.i..r~JJ III I ~3:r1~~"'-:',~~\Cw j,}'"\-I '"~ c H..'I :':(-:~l"'~....i-C,-"I,.\;,<'-t"'r:'[l:r.r": I ~.J.::, ""'~~~
n ESOLUTIO;-..! - :1,
fl " 1 q fl? I 5 : 4 4
TO:MERI01AN WA5TEWAfEH
f' fH)N; L' f1HBflH I 1'1:',
r'o