HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-01-22
i
** TX CONFIRMh.,ON REPORT **
AS OF JAN 24 '0d 11:14 PAGE,a1
CITY OF MERIDIAN
05
07
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PG5
01/24 11:05 2088845077 EC--S 00'37" 002
01/24 11:14 LEGAL DEPARTMENT ----5 00'00" 000
THIS DOCUMENT 15 STILL IN MEMORY
CMDl:l STATUS
193 OK
193 BUSY
--~------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
TuesdaYt January 22, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
)( Tammy de Weerd _L Bill Nary
X. Cherie ~Candless =;z= Keith Bird
--1L- Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Special
Meeting: apfYvVte.
B. Approve minutes from December 11. 2001 City Council Strategic
Planning Workshop: a-pr Vl.C,...
C. Approve minutes from January 8t 2002 City Council Special
Meeting: Ci1;rpY'f> vu.....-
D. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Strategic
Planni~g Session I Workshop: ~w.--
E. Proclamation for Idaho State University Day: tVJ7ff&l/I..V
F. Amendment to Development Agreement for Bear Creek
Subdivision: tkpprll fIlt.
G. TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement: ~ j'l/P~
H. Aire Manufacturing Water Main Easement Agreement: a?J1r1Jv..e-
I. WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1: tZffYO {I1...t./
J. Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for
Professional Services: ~1fLC..--
Meridian City Cauncil A(lenda - Ill1luDly 22, 2002
Page 1 0'1"1
All lllllteri.ol8 pr=ntod o.t publil:mccliDs:L shall bcc:omc property oflhe en,. ofMttidion.
AnyOl\ll oo,iriuS lICO(\mm(ldA!ion fur dis!tbiliti<s >claIo1 In docum~ Mdlor h<:lI.rill@.'
pI..... ~ tho City Clak', Office o.t 88H-4433 allalS14S hours ~ to I.l>e public ltIeding.
** TX CONFIRh", ION REPORT **
AS OF JAN 30 '02 09:45 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
02 01/30 09:44 2088848929
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
G3--5 01' 14" 002 058 OK
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 22. 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
-L Tammy de Weerd -L Bill Nary
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
----- ~MayorRobertCorrie
2. Adoption of the Aganda: Approve
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutEls from December 11, 2001 City Council Special
Meeting: Approve
B. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Strategic
Planning Workshop: Approve
C. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Special
Meeting: Approve
D. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Strategic
Planning Session I Workshop: Approve
E. Proclamation for Idaho State University Day: Approve
F. Amendment to Development Agreement for Bear Creek
Subdivision: Approve
G. TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement Approve
H. Aire Manufaduring Water Main Easement Agreement Approve
I. VlMlTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1:
Approve
J. Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for
Professional Services: Approve
Meridillll CilyCouneil ilgends -Janumy21, 2002
Ptofo I oU
Alll'1lllloria!s presented nl public _<lings ~u bdCOllld property onlLll Chy <>f Mqjdhlll,
Anyone de.<iring accommodation for di"'lbililj", relaled lo do"urncnl$ and/or hlll.rings
please eontact the City C1trk'. Offioe 01 gSg44J3 nllusl48 hours prior 10 tho public mvstlnl>-
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCil REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 22, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
)( Tammy de Weerd ~ Bill Nary
X Cherie ~Candless =z= Keith Bird
---LL- Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Special
Meeti ng: a f' ;? YIP V'-€-
B. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Strategic
Planning Workshop: apflY'P VLe:..-
C. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Special
Meeting: C2/;)pro VlJL--
D. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Strategic
Planning Session I Workshop: appr-vViL-
E. Proclamation for Idaho State University Day: vVffrpvu:...-
F. Amendment to Development Agreement for Bear Creek
Subdivision:
appro IItC
G. TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement: ttp/l77Jwz.-
H. Aire Manufacturing Water Main Easement Agreement: afjJrlJ()...€-
I. WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1: c2ff'ro {Il.L.--
J. Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for
Professional Services: ~~
Meridian City Council Agenda - January 22, 2002
Page I of I
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthc City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring aceommodatinn for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contaet the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
4. Department Reports:
8.
A.
Park'~ Department - Tom Kuntz:
B.
Chamber Expansion -- .Restrooms: .
refjJoru;( /iu:l1u"V tJ'vC 2--Iz...-I/1- w(J1Jc.f/wp
Naming of 56. -Acre Region,al Park: ~/ '7-26 -tJ 2- (h..hf1.-
de.f /4.- fl C rP rn fh I y....e R- f re JfJ 171\AA- ,?- ~
Public Work's Department - Gary Smith:
1.
2.
1. ACHD Projects - Agreements for Professional Services with
Civil Survey Consultants: ctPfP-n> VLiZ-
2. WWTP UV Disinfection, Grit Basin and Outfall Project -
Award of Construction Contract: t2flf/19 l/U....- fo 7;;u-/1 key
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda):
6.
Ordinance No. tJ2 - c; 37
Official Newspaper: c7?~ V'..e...--
7.
Ordinance No. Cross-Deputization of
Prosecutors with Boise City: I'~d' fftJ7ro-" t:i. f)~c'-"
Public Hearing: Public Work's Fees and Adjustments:
a-rhn./,er Iv }IN f'(VU re Sdu..hln.J
Meridian School District Presentation - Wendcll Bigham: e/1rt'.rhiu:.. ~6'frl/1 elf
-;t".-t.6f<:... t<.--' vI-? 2-?,-t:?L Jt-,~
Discussion of City Seal/logo:
-Ia~/.e IA/JVI? '; 2 - b -cJ Z j4-vt-r
Discussion of Cell Tower Draft Ordinance:
--I7vt Ie 1fA'1/ff2 2--26 -tJ 2- I~
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
t'lfPYPv<-~ 'f{/~o/.-I-- /-23 1 j- '30,-02-
9.
10.
11.
12.
Meridian City Council Agenda -January 22, 2002
Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone dcsiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 5, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3-C
REQUEST Approve minutes from January 22, 2002 Regular City Council Meeting
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
vV
{J;~
Date: Phone:
Materials presented at publiC meetIngs shall become property of the City Of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 22, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd X Bill Nary
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
o Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Special
Meeting: Approve
B. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Strategic
Planning Workshop: Approve
C. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Special
Meeting: Approve
D. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Strategic
Planning Session I Workshop: Approve
E. Proclamation for Idaho State University Day: Approve
F. Amendment to Development Agreement for Bear Creek
Subdivision: Approve
G. TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement: Approve
H. Aire Manufacturing Water Main Easement Agreement: Approve
I. WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1:
Approve
J. Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for
Professional Services: Approve
Meridian City Council Agenda - January 22, 2002
Poge I or2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
4. Department Reports:
A. Park's Department - Tom Kuntz:
1 , Chamber Expansion -- Restrooms: Respond further at
February 12, 2002 Workshop
2. Naming of 56-Acre Regional Park: Set up committee &
Respond at February 26, 2002 meeting
B. Public Workts Department - Gary Smith:
1, ACHD Projects - Agreements for Professional Services with
Civil Survey Consultants: Approve
2. WWTP UV Disinfection, Grit Basin and Outfall Project
Award of Construction Contract: Approve to Turnkey
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda):
6.
Ordinance No.
Approve
02-937
Official Newspaper:
7. Ordinance No. : Cross-Deputization of
Prosecutors with Boise City: Pulled from agenda
8. Public Hearing: Public Work's Fees and Adjustments: Attorney to
prepare resolution
9. Meridian School District Presentation - Wendell Bigham: Christine
Donnell
10. Discussion of City Seal! Logo: Table to February 5, 2002 meeting
11. Discussion of Cell Tower Draft Ordinance: Table to February 26, 2002
meeting
12. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve turnoff January 23,
2002 and January 30, 2002
Meridian City Council Agenda - January 22, 2002
Pngc: 20f2
All materials presented at public meetings shall bccome property ofthe City of Meridian,
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
plcase contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Council Meetim::J
January 22, 2002
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at
6:30 P.M. on Tuesday January 22,2002 by President Tammy de Weerd,
Members Present: Tammy de Weerd, Cherie McCandless, Bill Nary, and Keith Bird.
Members Absent: Mayor Robert Corrie.
Others Present: Bill Nichols, Mike Worley, Gary Smith, Brad Watson, Shari Stiles, Ken
Bowers, and Tom Kuntz.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd X Bill Nary
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
o Mayor Robert Corrie
De Weerd: -- at this Council meeting. First I would like to welcome Troop 152
sponsored by the LDS Parkside Ward. Thank you for joining us. Is this the whole troop
here, or do we have two?
Unidentified Speaker: 128.
De Weerd: 128, and who are you sponsored by? Well, great. It's nice having you here
and we hope you learn a lot tonight. Mr. Clerk can you do roll call?
Berg: Thank you Madam President. I know you didn't like Madam but I'm sorry.
De Weerd: Madam is fine.
Berg: Thank you Madam President, roll call.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
De Weerd: The second item on our agenda is the adoption of the agenda. Are there any
changes?
Nichols: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr, Attorney,
Nichols: Item No.7 will be a resolution, It is not ready so that needs to be taken off the
agenda.
De Weerd: Okay. We can just pull that from the agenda?
Meridian City Council Regular Meetulg
January 22, 2002
Page 2 of 46
Nichols: Yes.
De Weerd: Okay, item NO.7 then will be pulled from the agenda. There has also been a
request that we move the Meridian School District presentation from NO.9 to before the
department reports. Do any of our Council Members have anything, any problem with
that?
Nary: No.
De Weerd: Okay. I would entertain a motion.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes,
Bird: [would move that we adopt the agenda, As noted, item 7 will be scrapped until a
later date when we get the deal and that item NO.9 discussion with Meridian School
District be moved to item NO.4 ahead of the Parks Department reports.
Nary: Second,
De Weerd: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to adopt the agenda as
changed, Are there any further discussions? Hearing none, all those in favor of the
motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 3.
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Special
Meeting:
B. Approve minutes from December 11, 2001 City Council Strategic
Pla-nning Workshop:
C. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Special
Meeting:
D. Approve minutes from January 8, 2002 City Council Strategic
Planning Session I Workshop:
E. Proclamation for Idaho State University Day:
F. Amendment to Development Agreement for Bear Creek
Subdivision:
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlll!]
January 22, 2002
Page 3 of 46
G. TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement:
H. Aire Manufacturing Water Main Easement Agreement:
I. WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order NO.1:
J. Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for
Professional Services:
De Weerd: Okay, NO.3 the consent agenda.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird?
Bird: there's one of these and I marked it down. I don't know when the right one. It's got
the signature in the wrong place on one of these consent agendas. The contractor
signed where the City was suppose to or something. Maybe I was seeing things.
(inaudible) the one I marked down.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: I've got some post it's and I marked it down. I thought I had it.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Smith: Madam President.
Bird: Yes?
Smith: Councilman Bird I think it's-
De Weerd: You can see there's a struggle with the change.
Bird: Yes.
Smith: Under the public works department, Brad Watson said it's item No.2, or--
Bird: Oh, okay.
Smith: -- excuse me item No.1 the professional services with Civil Survey.
Bird: That's it, right.
De Weerd: Okay, is that under Department reports?
Meridian City Council Regular Meetu'!:l
January 22, 2002
Page 4 of 46
Smith: Yes ma'am.
De Weerd: Okay.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes?
Bird: I would move that we approve the consent agenda as noted.
McCandless: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. Consent agenda, been moved to approve as presented. Is there any
discussion? With no further discussion, all those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Berg: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Berg?
Berg: Just out of safeguard, I think we should probably take roll call on the consent
agenda because there are some agreements, especially a development agreement that
needs to have the roll call vote.
De Weerd: Okay, thank you.
Berg: Sorry.
De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Berg, would you like to call roll?
Berg: Yes, I will thank you.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Nary, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 9.
Meridian School District Presentation - Wendell Bigham:
De Weerd: Okay. Item NO.4 has been amended on the agenda. The Meridian School
District Presentation, Christine Donnell. You don't look like Wendell.
Donnell: I don't do I?
De Weerd: That was a compliment.
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlll~
January 22, 2002
Page 5 of 46
Donnell: Thank you. President de Weerd and Council Members, Mr. Berg, Mr. Nichols.
Thank you very much for accommodating first of all an opportunity to speak to you
sooner. I actually was planning to go from here to the Eagle City Council to give the
same presentation. That was our request. Then Wendell and I decided that we would
just divide the presentation. So, he will be at Eagle and presenting about 8:00 much of
the same information that I'm going to be talking to you about today. First of all, I have a
handout that I would like to provide to you. I would like to just walk you through it very
quickly. Then I can answer any questions you might have or offer a little bit more
information.
De Weerd: Christine, we also have two of our P&Z commission members here. Do you
have extra copies?
Donnell: I made six. (inaudible)
De Weerd: Yes, please.
Donnell: Thank you. J should have made you some extras. I'll wait just a minute until
you have it in front of me, in front of you. I guess I do have it in front of me. As you are
very well aware, we are continually looking at our projections, at the growth that we
experience in the Meridian School District. We've had really an unprecedented growth
just as the City of Meridian has. That goes hand and hand. We are projecting right now,
very early, somewhere around 700 new students even this next year. Even though, I
think as you all saw in the paper that building permits are down and there's probably
some slowing of the growth that's being projected. What we do when we look at that
growth is we just roll all of our classrooms up. As we continue to graduate classes of
seniors that are less than the classes of kindergartners that we have, then we continue
to see that growth. In reality, we have about 100 new students from the time we took
our attendance this fall to right now. But, again that will still reflect more students this
spring as we do our projections. This spreadsheet that you have in front of you is one
that Wendell has put together. So, if there are some questions I can't answer, we'll sure
have him back here to make sure that you get any answers. At the top there's just some
information. The capacity of the elementary schools, there's six grade, kindergarten
through five, a grade -capacity 108: Then the middle school, about 1000 with three
grades. High school of course about 2000, we would rather it be 1800 and then four
grades in our high school. As you can see, there are three elementary schools generally
will support a middle school. One and a half middle schools support a high school as
you roll up. I'm here tonight just, really to talk mostly about the north Meridian planning
area because that has us extremely concerned, as I know it does you as well. We see
a lot of development at least requested in that area. First of all, in that center part of this
spreadsheet you'll see that we're just talking about ten square miles. That relates to 640
acres. You can see the development. We expect that it's going to have 77 percent
residential utilization. So, the houses, then that that ten square miles in that north
Meridian planning area will relate to 17,818. What we have used in the past as we try to
determine how many students are going to come out of a particular development or out
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 6 of 46
of a particular area is the 0.8 that you see there. That seems like kind of a funny
number. That is really, I mean it's a variable, without a doubt. We've had some of our
patrons who think that that's too low. We've had some that think that it's too high. That's
generally what we've used. So, as you can see in that ten square miles, the total K
through 12 students would be 14,254. We worked with some densities so you see the
low and medium and high density. I won't go through that but the total dwelling units are
listed there per square mile, which we estimate to be 1,782. The last section on that first
page that might be a little confusing is that we took our elementary distribution per
square miles, You have six grades in elementary, out of 13. We determine that by the
.08 and we multiply that by .46, which is the number of our students that would be
represented in those grades. Then we see that we have 650, if of course, they all came
in and separated according to all these grade levels, that we would have 6557
elementary students, If our capacity at our elementary schools is 650, then we're
looking at 10.09 elementary schools in that north Meridian planning area. You can see
as you go down the column, 3.28 middle schools and 2.2 high schools for that. On the
next page, we kind of looked at so many dwelling units per acre depending on the
density that is determined either by the camp plan or by your decisions and what
approvals they have, So, the next three columns down on the next page, all you'll see is
our calculations if it happens to be either low, medium or high density. As you can see,
the number of schools we have put in bold so that you can recognize how many
elementary schools, middle schools and high schools we would anticipate that we would
need in this area. At the very bottom of this page is the investment that we look at in
terms of this growth. So, we have just gone through a calculation of 13 elementary
schools and what that would cost, total buildings, middle and senior. You can see that at
the very right hand part of that last column $238,500,000.00 is the investment in just
that north planning area for our district patrons. We also broke out the land costs, the
bullding costs, that investment total and then the investment per square mile. All of that
seems kind of probably, it could very well be just an effort that's not going to mean
much because what ever happens there, we'll make sure that we try to provide the
education for those kids. I might just share with you that, I think when I was here last, I
told or maybe the time before that. I told Councilman Anderson at the time that the
number of, the percent of the students in Meridian City and in the area of impact was
about 40 percent. I was pretty much right on. As we went back and looked at those
calculations. Wendell tonight is telling the City of Eagle that their percent of our district
of student population is about 19 percent. So, 31 percent resides in Boise, the area that
we serve that's in both the City of Boise's area and also Ada County. So, we have, we
have a huge investment in making sure that all of our communities are well aware of
what we're seeing and the needs that we're going to face in the next few years. We
currently just, for a reminder have three high schools. We'll be opening Mountain View
in 2003. We have two alternative schools that are just 150 students. We have one
charter school that is currently at 200, a little bit less than that but that's it's capacity. We
have five middle schools, one alternative middle school and we have 22 elementaries.
We'll have Ponderosa opening up this fall. That's in the area of Ten Mile and Ustick.
With that I can talk to you about capacity. I can try to answer any of these questions on
the spreadsheet that Wendell put together. With that I'll just stand for questions.
Meridian City Council Regular Meel".!;)
January 22, 2002
Page 7 of 46
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Miss Donnell, this is great information. I'm wondering, just for my edification as
well as the public. So, what would you like us to do with this information? How would
you like us to apply it when we have projects that come forth? Secondly, what is the
school district doing to sort of get to that $257 million number? What are you doing in
advance of that?
Donnell: Besides gasping? I mean, a lot. Councilman Nary, I think what we're trying to
do --. First of all is to provide the information, you know to all the permitting agencies
because we have no authority at all to deny or approve any kind of development. Before
I go on to ask the rest of your question, answer the rest your question I will mention that
we have, we've worked, revised the letter that we send when we have a request to
respond to development. You'll see that it's a little bit stronger in our attempt to say to
the developers you know this is what, and to the agencies that this is how it will impact
us, That we continue to see this kind of phenomenal growth. I hope that that helps.
Without us being accused by the development community that we're trying to stop or
slow development. That is not our intent. We just have always said if it the kids come,
we'll accommodate them. We just know that that is a huge issue in your hands. What
we're doing right now is, trying to anticipate as we look at running the next bond to have
enough money in there that we can begin to buy property out ahead. I think that's just
pretty much all we can do. We have not been successful in the past in running a bond
issue that would open schools that were not at capacity. We're going to try that with
Ponderosa. We're going to try to keep it a little under capacity because we know that
growth will come around. Generally we've not been successful at passing bonds saying
that we're going to build for the future. If I had my wish, [ would hope that this fall I
would go to the patrons and say we need to pass about $120,000,000.00 of bonds, but
we only want to construct half of that in the next two to three years and then half again. I
think that'll be a hard sale e~ven though our market value has increased and we've been
able to keep that tax rate levy even. I'm not sure that we could that with 120 million. But
I would love to be able to go to our folks and say, we're not going to come back to you
in two more years because that's what we've been doing. We've had wonderful support
from the community. That's been gratifying because I think that we realize and that they
realize that the growth is something that we all have take care of and that we need to
build schools to house all the students that come. We're going to currently really be
talking to the Eagle community about one more elementary school in that area. Then as
we see the growth, if it occurs in the north Meridian planning area that is being
addressed, then that'll push that boundary further toward Eagle. That will probably hold
unless we see a lot more development in Star. The south Boise area in our district I
believe is really going to begin to mushroom. It's kind of held. It's interesting to watch
Meridian City Council Regular Meelu.g
January 22, 2002
Page 8 of 46
that because we've been accused of not really having good projections out there and
that we're going to see a ton of new kids. They're starting to come now. Lake Hazel is
way over capacity. Currently Ridgewood and Silversage are still under capacity and
we're handling a lot of our subdivisions by transporting them to those schools. Did I
answer your questions, Councilman? It's difficult to plan when you don't know what your
funding is going to be and able to do that. I think land is one of the biggest issues that
we have rig ht now.
Nary: Madam President. I have one other question. How receptive and how
cooperative has the development community been in working with the school district
with targeting or assisting in any of the purchase or sale of sites? How has that been?
Donnell: It's a great question, President de Weerd, Councilman Nary. I'm going to
remember all these things. I'm usually sitting up there somewhere. I think that they've
been very cooperative. I wish they were more cooperative and would just donate sites
to us. But, they're not quite that cooperative. When they donate a site, or if they would
donate a site, of course that increases the amount that they have to recover from each
of the acres or whatever their development density is so we see that. But, they've really
been cooperative in terms of saying you know this is where we could build into our
design an elementary school or a middle school or a high school in that area. I think that
they're, in fact I think they're quite happy about having that. That also, I think provides
green space, as you're looking at in your comp plan to be able to develop that so that's
it's really a quality of life area. We are talking and we'll continue to talk to whatever
agency wants to visit with us about having joint school and park sites. I have to just
share with you that, when we did that the very first time and Dan Mabe was the deputy
superintendent and I was complaining to him that that was never going to work. That we
would be having all kinds of difficulty with supervision and you know the big bad guys
coming out of the bushes. To this date, we have been very pleased with the way our
joint park and school sites have been handled. That's still something that we would
really like to talk to. I know Tom just loves listening. He's writing it down. Are you writing
my words there? I told him I was going to owe him because I got to go before his
Department report. I think that Wendell is working very closely with the developers and
trying you know just to make sure that we know where we can get sites. But, we've just
got to get way out ahead of it, way out. Then we have the issue of trying to provide
, . -
services.
De Weerd: Miss Donnell, I do have a couple of questions. One, I think the north
Meridian area plan process has really made us all stop and evaluate infrastructure
needs and the costs and that sort of thing. I think it has also kind of helped for you to
start planning and looking at these numbers. They're quite compelling. This is
something that really needs to go through the legislature and be part of their planning
and considering how do we address our educational needs and what is the most
appropriate method of doing it especially in an area like the Treasure Valley and the
rapid growth that is has experienced and it will continue to experience. I know that the
BCA is looking at solutions with the City in some of these things and they should be a
Meridian City Council Regular Meellll\J
January 22, 2002
Page 9 of 46
partner to this as well. You know, I would wholeheartedly ask them to partner with the
school district, the City and the building community to try and find some solutions to this.
Donnell: I might mention President de Weerd that we haven't been too successful in
having the legislature recognize the needs of a growing a community. But, when you
look at the makeup of the legislature and you see that a good share of our legislatures
are coming from communities where there is no growth, then it begins to be
understandable. I served on the governor's Blue Ribbon Task Force on facilities two
years ago. The huge issue is, is it a local responsibility or is it a state responsibility to
deal with providing facilities for our children? It's a philosophical discussion that
generally if one has one particular view it's not changed easily.
De Weerd: Well, numbers are pretty compelling. This helps put a lot of this into
perspective. Staff, do you have any questions for Miss Donnell? No? Commissioners?
Jerry, would you like to come up and use the microphone?
Centers: Jerry Centers, 1934 Retriever in Meridian. Over how many years was the
projection? Maybe I missed that.
Donnell: You did not miss that and I didn't say it. We're saying probably ten to 15 and
possibly 20. We expect it would be more than 20 as we've talked in terms of our
projections.
Centers: The bottom line dollars, was that today's estimate or was it based on inflation
rates down the road?
Donnell: I can't answer that. I don't know. That's a real good question. I'll get back with
you on that if that's okay. I don't know if we built in an inflationary percent. Usually we
do and it's usually three percent.
Centers: Okay.
De Weerd: Mr. Borup? No? Council, anything further? Thank you so much.
Donnell: Thank you.
De Weerd: This is very hel~ful and I hope that this can be included in the public hearing
next week on January 30t in the open house that they have with the north Meridian
plan. So, somehow a Jot of this can be incorporated. They might even see the value of
at least giving some raw land prices rather than the developed price that they get you.
Donnell: Sure, Madam President, Wendell will be there. I have class that night but he is
planning to be there. He also has some information that he could put on an overhead. I
understand it's an open house and kind of an informal forum. So, he will plan to be there
and we'll be part of that, absolutely.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Meridian City Council Regular Meellllg
January 22, 2002
Page 10 of 46
Donnell: And we'll be back on the comp plan too.
De Weerd: Just one last thing. On our workshop on February 1ih,__
Donnell: Yes?
De Weerd: Since you brought up co-location of parks, maybe that's something that we
can talk specifically about then?
Donnell: Great.
De Weerd: Okay.
Donnell: Okay. Thank you again for your time.
Item 4.
Department Reports:
A. Park's Department - Tom Kuntz:
1. Chamber Expansion -- Restrooms:
2. Naming of 56-Acre Regional Park:
De Weerd: Now, we'll get to the real item No, 4, Department reports. We'll start with
item A, parks Department, Mr. Kuntz,
Kuntz: Thank you Madam President and Council. I really have only one true item that
requests action tonight if possible. It is naming the 58-acre park.
De Weerd: Do you want to start with item No.1 though?
Kuntz: Sure.
De Weerd: Please?
Kuntz: It's item No, 2 in my memo. I'm sorry, I apologize.
De Weerd: Okay,
Kuntz: You should have a memo in your packets dated January 1ih. That's item NO.2
in that memo. As you recall at the January 8th workshop, we presented an estimate from
Beniton to complete the restroom expansion at Storey Park as part of the Chamber
expansion. Their estimate was $75,000,00 and our budget was 63,000. Council directed
our staff to find out from Beniton why the increase and where it could be attributed to,
You should have an attachment to that memo. I believe it's the very last page of that
Meridian City Council Regular Meet" 'll
January 22, 2002
Page 11 of 46
memo that shows an up to date cost estimate. There's two columns. One is dated July
18th and one is dated January 18,2002. As you can see the estimate has come down
substantially from 75,000 to 68,798. We're looking for some additional possible
deletions. One is under general conditions, the first item under activity, there is
approximately $2,000.00 in there for cold weather construction which would include
blanketing for concrete work and those type of items. We're hoping that with the
cooperation from the weather, that we will not incur that cost. Secondly, towards the
bottom, we have plumbing and HVAC, which is currently $20,000.00. There may be an
opportunity for the actual plumbing of the facility to be donated by the plumber's, I don't
know if it's a union but I'll call it that. They're discussing that now with Beniton. There
are some additional costs that are not shown in this budget which are, half of the design
of the building, the Ada County Highway District impact fees and future sidewalk
construction totaling about $4500.00. We are still estimating that we are going to have
some cost savings from the additional $120,000.00 that we have budgeted for the
phase one construction of the park and we are still hoping that this amount of currently
68,798 comes closer to the 63,000 we have budgeted. So, with the permits that we're
paying we'll be in the $68,000 range total. I would stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions? Mr. Kuntz, I do have one, So, if you go at the 68798
plus the 4500, you think that the phase one budgeting process can cover that overage if
nothing else is deleted from this total?
Kuntz: President de Weerd, Council. I guess I'm not in a position tonight to answer
definitely yes. I would like to delay that answer until your workshop in February so we
have a --, We are getting some further additional estimates on the individual costs of
phase one and we'll have a clearer picture. I will tell you that we understand that the
City Council as well as staff is committed to the restroom and if there need to be some
things taken out of phase one, that's what we would propose to do.
De Weerd: Okay, thank you. Did you have anything else on that one?
Kuntz: No Ma'am.
De Weerd: Okay,
2, Naming of 56-Acre Regional Park:
Kuntz: The last item is naming the 58-acre park. Just to briefly explain what's in the
packet with the memo. The City Council advertised, actually staff advertised for the
Parks and Recreation Commission requests from the community for suggestions on the
name of our new 58-acre park on the corner of Ustick and Meridian Road. We received,
I believe it was about 40, 46 suggestions. The commission prioritized those and
narrowed it down to three at their meeting in December. Then I believe it was in January
came up with the recommendation of Freedom Park to pass along to the City Council.
Tonight we are requesting from the City Council a formal adoption of the name of the
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 12 of 46
park. Staff is not making a recommendation. We don't feel like that's our role. I'll stand
for any questions,
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions?
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Mr. Kuntz, how was the advertising done to solicit suggestions from the
community and what was the criteria that the commission used to decide on Freedom
Park as the recommendation?
Kuntz: The advertising was done through the Valley News, through the Idaho
Statesman and through the elementary schools within our area of impact. The criteria
was very simple. We were looking for names of geographic significance or historical
significance. We're trying to stay away from personal names. Does that sound right
President de Weerd? She was our liaison at that point.
Nary: So, then Mr. Kuntz, what was the rationale -- . What was the reason for the
selection of Freedom Park over some of the other suggestions? When you said
historical, you meant historical in the broad sense of the United States, not just
Meridian, I assume, It sounds (inaudible).
Kuntz: That's correct.
De Weerd: It was historical to Meridian.
Kuntz: I'm sorry, to Meridian,
Nary: Okay, it's supposed to be historical to Meridian? Okay.
Kuntz: I don't want to speak for the commission but if you'll notice the list. Freedom
Park I believe is suggested about five or six times. I have attached a third page to your
memo that goes into a Httlebit more detail a couple of individuals who recommended
Freedom Park, I believe most of those recommendations were made as a result of the
September 11 th tragedy. I don't know if [ need to read those, I could.
De Weerd: Tom, what were the top three names?
Kuntz: The top three names were Settler's, which references the irrigation company
who brought water to that area. Progress Park and I believe that was a relationship to
the progress that has been made in the Meridian area over the last ten years and
Freedom Park.
Meridian City Council Regular Meetll,g
January 22, 2002
Page 13 of 46
De Weerd: Lila Hill, who is our local historian, emailed some information on that piece of
property and I did distribute it to you, or Will did before the meeting. Tom did you get a
copy of that?
Kuntz: I did.
De Weerd: She wasn't aware of when the discussion was made at the parks and
recreation commission meeting, She did want some historical knowledge for this
particular site in front of City Council so you can kind of get an idea that piece of
property and crucial to Meridian when it first settled was water. That particular site was
not settled on because it was set aside for school endowment lands, which were sold
and not homesteaded. Just to the south of it on both sides of Meridian Road, just south
of Ustick, that is where the original settlement was for this community, So, it does have
significant historical value, That's also where Settler's Irrigation District was named after
because of the early settlers that were living in that area and because of the importance
of water. She just felt that this information in front of you right now was important to the
consideration for a regional park that is very important to our community. Unfortunately,
the Parks and Recreation Commission did not have this information in their decision. I
believe that when they did vote on the final name, there was a split vote, wasn't it Tom?
Or, was that earlier on?
Kuntz: I believe that was earlier on President de Weerd.
De Weerd: So, Council, what would you like to do here? Is there any comments from
the people out there that you would like considered for this park name? This is what the
park is for, you young people out there.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: While they're getting their nerve up to come up forward, I'll put in some deal. I
have no problem with the Freedom Park. I would prefer to see that at a smaller park. I
believe that this is a regional park, 56 acres probably within the City impact area will not
ever develop another 'park-this large. I think it ought to reflect upon what built this
community, I see that there is much more regarding dairy of some sort mentioned here
that is probably --. The Freedom Park, I would like to see the park be - have something
regarding the dairy, and dairy days whatever if we don't want an individual's name. I
think that Freedom Park would be a smaller one down the road, which I hope we will be
developing 20-acre parks. For a big regional park, I would like to see it named after, at
least the industry that probably did as much in getting the community of Meridian up and
running. At one time we had one of the largest milk factories here. I would like to take
that. I don't think it's necessary that we have to name the park tonight. We need to get it
developed before we worry about a name. I would like to see something that would be
more historical towards the community.
Meridian City Council Regular Meellllg
January 22, 2002
Page 14 of 46
De Weerd: Thank you.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: First, I did --. Mrs. Gonzalez called my house today and asked that her
suggestion be included. I told her that I would at least let the Council know. She had
suggested basically a contraction of America and Meridian into a word, which looks to
me like Ameridian, but it's the contraction of the two. There's a couple of other park
names that are contractions of different words. I would agree in principle with what
Council Member Bird says as well. Although I certainly don't want to say that freedom
isn't important because I think it is and I do think that that's a very good name for a park.
This may be the largest park that the City ever does. I think it is significant enough to
the City and there's an historical significance to the side that it made sense to me why
that was a criteria that was being used to make a decision as to what the name should
be. It would be, I guess my preference that we at least consider something that is more
tied to our community, that is identifiable to our community. Freedom Park is a very
good name but it doesn't have a tie to Meridian itself. I think Miss Hill, in a couple of her
suggestions mentioned in here that there is the Centennial of the Village of Meridian in
2003. That's an interesting idea that I wasn't aware of.
Bird: That's right.
Nary: That might be something to consider as a possible name. I would also agree
with Mr. Bird, I don't know that we have to pick the name tonight. I guess I got the
impression the reason we were considering making this decision now is so we would
stop calling it the 56-acre park and we'd actually call it by something. It's not common
that it has to be named prior to opening it or dedicating it or anything. So, it doesn't have
to be decided tonight. I would really like to --. I guess I would really like to explore
names that are much more tied to our community. This is a crowning jewel of our parks
Department and of this City. I think we should treat it like that. I think it should be
something that we can all point to and not find a name that is, although very noteworthy,
its very generic in context and may have a lot of credibility in some contexts but not on
the crowning jewel of our Cfty or our parks system that we have that I think we would be
much happier in not picking something that fits the mood of the day. But rather fits the
mood of our City from the past as well as the future. I don't know what we need to do to
explore that going forward to make a decision on the name but I guess I'm not positive
we need to pick it today,
De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless, do you have any comments?
McCandless: Thank you Madam President. Sitting here listening, I do agree with Mr.
Bird and Mr. Nary. I kind of like the, going along with that, I kind of like Settler's Park for
the historical meaning of that one. I agree with them that Freedom Park could be very
easily be one of our smaller parks as time goes on. I think it should be historical.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 15 of 46
De Weerd: I think a lot of these comments were shortly after 9-11 and it certainly was
utmost on everyone's mind. I agree it is a worthy name and probably a park in Meridian
or even an activity within this park it would be appropriate. Mr. Borup, did you have a
comment? Please, come up. It's not a public hearing so I won't swear you in.
Borup: Keith Borup, 2090 Freedom Lane.
De Weerd: Freedom Lane?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Borup: My comments are based on Councilman Bird's. Something kind of clicked with
me when he was talking about tying into dairy. I believe it's (inaudible) a couple names
to throw out, Challenge Park is something that would tie in but is also a name that had
double meaning, I mean more than one meaning. That was the first name I had. The
other one that I liked even better was Councilman Nary said, Centennial Park. That
would be two names that I would throw out.
De Weerd: Thank you very much. Okay. Any of the young people that would like to
come up and comment or offer any ideas? It might be that good way to get that
citizenship badge. Is that what we're going for tonight?
Bird: Public speaking, come on. The microphone won't more than bite you.
De Weerd: Yes, and we won't, Okay, I won't put you on the spot. How about your troop
leaders?
(inaudible discussion from audience)
Bird: Here comes one. He's getting ready.
De Weerd: Okay, great.
Bird: You can come right up here, young man.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Unidentified Speaker: We were over there talking --,
De Weerd: Would you please state your name?
Brenton: Brandon Brenton.
De Weerd: Thank you Brandon.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 16 of 46
Brenton: We were over there talking, we thought up 109 park because Meridian has
been here 109 years, so like 109 or something.
De Weerd: That's a great suggestion. ] like your reasoning too, Thank you.
McCandless: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thanks. It doesn't look like Tom, that you'll get a name tonight but Council
when would you like to re-visit this topic?
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Nary?
Nary: Maybe so that people don't think that government never gets anything
accomplished, before we meet again, maybe what would be helpful is if we had
whoever we want to have bring us these suggestions. We've had the parks commision
gives us a suggestion now. The Council certainly spoke on what their feelings are.
Would it be beneficial to have a very small group, Mr. Kuntz, a member of this Council,
a member of the parks commission, or something like that? Speak with Miss Hill, talk
with some other folks and bring back a suggestion or two or three so this Council can
make a decision? I'm afraid if we just set it on our agenda again in a month or two;
we're probably just going to have the same discussion. If we feel comfortable with that, I
certainly would be willing to do that, or if you would like someone else that would fine,
but some way that we can actually --.
*** End of Side One ***
Nary: -- two or three suggestions and make a decision and move on. Or, set a target for
when that needs to be accomplished. If we had a dedication date for this park and we
want to have a name picked before that, we'd have some idea of when this needs to be
accomplished. 2003 seems like possible anyway.
Bird: That might be a possipility.
Nary: That might be possible anyway. That way we at least have a target. I'm just
afraid if we put it on our agenda, we're just going to talk about it again like this and
people will feel like we're not getting anything done. If we just set a target, set some
folks to help us reach that target, give us some suggestions, we could maybe get this
moving on.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird,
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22,2002
Page 17 of 46
Bird: I agree with Councilman Nary, lets get the thing done. Lets have a Councilperson,
jf it's agreeable to you and the Council lets have the Council and Mr. Kuntz and
probably Bruce McCoy off of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or Parks and Rec
Commission and maybe Lila Hill. The four of them come down and come back to us on
February 26th with a suggestion. At that time, we can make it. We don't have to,
regardless of what we call it we don't have to dedicate until the deal is ready.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary or Mr. Bird, would one of you like to sit on that?
Bird: I just made that a motion.
De Weerd: I don't think you need a motion. Which one of you would like to serve?
Nary: It doesn't matter. I would be willing to do it or Mr. Bird (inaudible),
Bird: I'm the liaison for the parks and on the parks and rec commission so [ think Mr.
Nary would be fine because we're going to have Bruce who is on the Parks and
Recreation commission.
De Weerd: Okay. Is that okay?
Nary: Certainly.
De Weerd: Can we add one more as a representative from the historical society?
Bird: Well that's Lila.
De Weerd: Well, Lila is on there but I think that we could get someone else (inaudible).
We could just ask the historical society to appoint someone,
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Okay.
Bird: Have the Mayor take care of this or are you going to take care of it?
De Weerd: I will let the Mayor know but Mr. Kuntz, can you take charge of this?
Kuntz: Yes Ma'am.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. If we could just get an update at --. Yes, what we can do
is tentatively set this for the 26th and if the committee can please let the Mayor know or
the clerk then we'll know if we need to schedule it or not.
Kuntz: What did you say?
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22,2002
Page 18 of 46
De Weerd: I know, that phone was a little distracting wasn't it? If on February 26th we
can schedule this as an agenda item to re-visit? Do you think your committee can meet
by then --?
Kuntz: Definitely,
De Weerd: -- and come up with some background? Okay.
B. Public Work's Department - Gary Smith:
1, ACHD Projects - Agreements for Professional Services with
Civil Survey Consultants:
De Weerd: Okay, item B Public Works Department, Mr. Smith.
Smith: Thank you Madam President, Council. I've got two items on the public works
Department. Brad's been intimately involved in them so I'll pass the microphone to him.
Watson: Madam President, Council Members. The first item is approval of agreement
for professional services with Civil Survey Consultants for five separate water and
sewer projects associated with the five different ACHD projects in the next couple of
years. Hopefully those are all in your memo. As Councilman Bird pointed out earlier and
I had not noticed, they are signed in the wrong spot. We'll make sure that we get that
taken care of this week. This is similar to what we did on the Locust Grove project that
was completed last year where we go in and we build out complete all the water and
sewer facilities in conjunction with ACHD's roadway project. It saves us on service
repair and we pay just a portion of the mobilization, traffic control that we ordinarily
would pay. There were six projects that we requested proposals for. One of those I've
taken off the list, that's the portion of Locust Grove from Franklin to 1-84. We have some
projects, some applications into us that may take care of most of those remaining
facilities. If they don't come through, then we'll bring that sixth one back to you in the
future. We solicited these proposals from Civil Survey because as you'll note in the
memo, they are providing the roadway design for three of those five projects. So, it will
be very easy to incorporate the water and sewer plans into their street plans. The other
two they are the surVeyor, they're sub-consultant for HDR. If there are any other
questions or if you need anymore detail, I'll stand for those questions and I --. There's a
sample motion there for you. I know it's very wordy.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr, Bird.
Bird: Brad, on this, is this a firm estimate? Are we doing it by the hour? How is this
contract set up? I mean, it says man-hour estimates. Evidently they've got the man-hour
so much per hour.
i
I
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 19 of 46
Watson: Councilman Bird, Madam President, and Council Members. I was going to
point that out. In my memo I stated these are lump sum amounts. That's not accurate.
Each one of the contracts lets see if I can find it. You see a fee schedule for each
agreement. Then the next page describes what they're going to do, Then the next page
after that, towards the end of their narrative --. I'm looking at the Franklin Road, East
First to Nola but I think they're probably all the same. It says that these are on a time
and materials basis not to exceed. So, I erred in the memo. They are not lump sum
amounts,
Bird: (inaudible) excuse me. Madam President. Brad, I don't see in this agreement, I
don't see where it says not to exceed. I don't like seeing agreements without knowing
what their labor charges are whether it's $100.00, $150.00 an hour or what it is per man.
Watson: On the first agreement -
Bird: Is that the one they've signed in the wrong place?
Watson: Right, they've signed all of them in the wrong place. The first agreement that I
have, at least in my packet is Overland Road, Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road. On
the sheet past their prevailing fee schedule -
Bird: Oh, okay, that's page four of four.
Watson: Then we jump to a new part of the agreement, which describes in detail what
they're going to do. There's that page. Then the second page, sheet two of two, the
third to the last paragraph says we propose to provide the design services as outlined
above on a time and materials basis with a not to exceed without prior approval of our --
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: So, each one of these six here is, the cost estimate is not to exceed, right? That
they've got in the right hand column under this estimate?
Watson: Councilman Bird, fbelieve your question was in my memo, the dollar figures in
that list they are -
De Weerd: We don't have a copy of your memo so we're working at a disadvantage
right now.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: It's the list that says the projects and there are six projects listed? You've got total
man-hour estimate, total man-hour, and cost estimate. If I go back and read that one
agreement, the Overland Road one, the 10,745 not to exceed is exactly what they're
showing here. Is that not right, Brad?
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 20 of 46
Nichols: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nichols,
Nichols: Mr. Watson, it's the second page following the coversheet from Matt Hart. It's
actually their spreadsheet --.
Bird: Yes, spreadsheet.
Watson: Okay. Councilman Bird, yes there is a spreadsheet with just a small table at
the top. All those figures on the right coordinate with the five projects. There is the sixth
one in there that I mentioned.
Bird: Those are the not to exceeds?
Watson: Those are the not to exceed amounts for each one.
Bird: Okay.
Watson: I apologize if you don't have the memo.
De Weerd: That's all right. I think the Clerk is copying it.
Bird: I think we're okay.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr, Nary.
Nary: Brad, just one question. So, what my assumption is is there are --. This is one of
the agreements. There is an agreement for each one of these projects but all I see is
one that we have in this packet. We only have one. The one that --. It all has the same
language in it. Is that correct? All of them are identical other than the numbers?
Watson: Councilman Nary, Madam President, Council. All the agreements, the
boilerplate is identical. The description of what they are going to do and incorporate into
each project is specific as well as the dollar amount.
Nary: On the not to exceed paragraph that we've been talking about, one of the --.
What it says not to exceed and it has a dollar figure. I understand that those relate to
these individual dollar figures on this small table, the 10,745. Two of the projects have
that amount. There are some varying amounts for the other projects. It says without
prior approval of the owner but the only reference to owner that I see in here is the
property owner. Isn't the not to exceed, without the prior approval of the City, which is
identified as the client?
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22,2002
Page 21 of 46
Bird: I was going to say we're clients,
Nary: I don't see a separate definition of owner in the agreement and the City on the
first paragraph is identified as the client.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Watson: Councilman Nary, I believe you're correct. I don't see another definition either.
Nary: j would just be concerned if we were to have a dispute of some sort that the
property owner is somehow driving this agreement when that's not anybody's intention.
I don't think it's the other Civil Service Consultant's either. It's just that I think it's just an
error, an oversight. Maybe we can at least make sure that's corrected as well to reflect
what the parties are.
Watson: Councilman Nary, I can certainly when I get them to sign the right spot, have
them either define owner or change that to City.
Nary: Great.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
McCandless: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: Brad, these figures you have in your memo on page three, of each of the
five projects. Are those the not to exceed figures?
Bird: (inaudible)
McCandless: j know. J'm confused.
Watson: Council Member McCandless. On page three of the memo and hopefully you
have the same one that I'm looking at. I'm not sure right now.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Watson: There's an item NO.2 on my third page talking about a UV disinfection process
to the wastewater plant which is our second item that I will get to. My second page
describes the ACHD projects and the five agreements.
McCandless: I see. Those are the not to exceed then? Franklin Road, East First to Nola
and that's 14,925?
Meridjan City Council Regular Meetlng
January 22, 2002
Page 22 of 46
Watson: Correct.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I'm sorry (inaudible).
McCandless: No, go ahead (inaudible).
Nary: I don't know what the past procedure has been so I guess it's more for my
clarification. I noticed in here that there's a recommended Council action and basically
the motion to approve these agreements but --. I don't have a problem with that maybe
with the changes regarding some of the language in it but is it not commonly done by
resolution? DO we only do it on an oral motion and there's no written resolution done
now or subsequent so that there's a written record that we approved these agreements?
Bird: It's a contract.
Nary: I understand that. But, he's asking us to make a motion to approve it on the
record. What I'm saying is, is there not, in your common procedure been to simply have
a written document, a resolution of the Council approving these contracts and directing
the Mayor to sign?
Bird: Never have been.
Nary: That's not been the --?
Bird: We've always just, in our motion Bill, it's just always said that, that we authorize
the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. It's a contract just like any other contract that
you have signed for professional services or for a bid, or like Kreizenbeck or doing the
thing. We never had a resolution on any of that. I don't know but that's just the practice
that we've done.
De Weerd: That's correct.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: If there's no more discussion, I would make a motion and make sure I can get
through it all. That we enter into these contracts with Civil Survey Consultants for
professional services for No.1, Franklin Road, East First to Nola, not to exceed
$14,925.00. No.2 is Franklin Road, Nola to East Gaudian not to exceed $14,925.00.
NO.3 is Locust Grove and Overland Road intersection, inclusive of 1-84 to Overland not
to exceed $9,795.00. No.4 is Overland Road, Meridian Road to Locust Grove, not to
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 23 of 46
exceed $10,745.00, NO.5 is Overland Road, Locust Grove to Eagle Road, not to
exceed $10,745.00. All these contracts are to designate the owners, clients, the
difference between owners and clients. Is that how you want (inaudible)? Okay.
Nary: Second,
De Weerd: It's been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion? So, the motion is to
award the agreements for professional services to Civil Survey Consultants for water
and sewer design associated with five different roadway projects with the appropriate
designations noted. That would include the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest?
Bird: Yes, Ma'am.
De Weerd: Does the second agree?
Nary: Yes.
De Weerd: Okay, Mr. Clerk, roll call.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Nary, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
2. WWTP UV Disinfection, Grit Basin and Outfall Project -
Award of Construction Contract:
De Weerd: Okay, Mr. Watson, item No.2,
Watson: Thank you Council. The second and final item under the public works
Department reports is the award of a construction contract for the wastewater treatment
plant ultra violet disinfection grit basin and outfall project. As my memo that I trust you
now have states we accepted six bids on January 8th. The low bidder was Turn -Key
Inc. $578,363.00. They have completed the last three or four projects at the wastewater
plant. The engineer's estimate on this project was $650,000.00. There is a fairly wide
range in the bid amounts. I would be .happy to answer any questions you may have.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad, I mean, they are $70,000.00 under the engineer's estimate. Do you feel that
they are sufficiently covered? Have you discussed it with Turn - Key?
Watson: Councilman Bird, Madam President, and Council Members. Keller Associates,
our engineer has reviewed all the bids and did contact both Turn - Key and Trammels
I nc, the second low bidder directly to verify that they were comfortable with their bids.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 24 of 46
Bird: Of course they are bonded. They do furnish a performance and payment bond?
Watson: Yes, Councilman Bird they do.
Bird: Okay. (inaudible).
De Weerd: Any other questions, Council? Okay. I would entertain a motion on this item.
McCandless: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: I would move that we award the contract for construction of UV
Disinfection Grit Basin and Outfall Project to Turn - Key Incorporated in the amount of
$578,363.00, authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest.
Nary: Second.
De Weerd: Okay, it's been moved and seconded to award the contract to UV
Disinfection, or of the UV Disinfection Grit Basin and Outfall Project to Turn - Key in the
amount of 578,363, authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk attest. Is there any further
discussion? All those in favor say aye,
McCandless: Roll call.
De Weerd: Oh, I'm sorry. Roll call vote. Sorry, Mr. Clerk.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Nary, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Watson: Thank you Council.
Bird: Thank you Brad,
De Weerd: Thank you Brad.
Item 6.
Ordinance No.
: Official Newspaper:
De Weerd: Okay, item NO.6 is Ordinance 02-937, official newspaper Ordinance. Mr.
Clerk will you read this Ordinance by title only?
Berg: Thank you Madam President, Members of the Council. Ordinance No. 01-937,
an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 847, an Ordinance of the City of Meridian Idaho
Meridian City Council Regular Meellllg
January 22, 2002
Page 25 of 46
amending Ordinance 847 to amend section two of chapter five of title one of the
Meridian City Code of the City of Meridian providing for the designation of the Valley
Times as the official newspaper of the City of Meridian and providing an effective date.
De Weerd: Okay. You've heard the reading of the Ordinance 02-937. Is there anyone in
the audience who would like to have the Ordinance read in it's entirety? Hearing none, I
would entertain a motion.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird.
Bird: We had some discussion on Ordinances at the last time. I would like the legal
counsel to --, When I make this motion, I want to make it right, okay? So, I would ask
Mr. Nichols to tell me (inaudible).
Nichols: Madam President and members of the Council. At our last meeting the motion
to adopt a couple of, or actually those were three annexation Ordinances. Since the
motion was to suspend the rule requiring three readings, the motion also included a
direction that the title of the Ordinance be changed so that when the Ordinance was
published, or a summary of the Ordinance was published it would reflect that the rule
had been suspended. I would like to suggest an alternate procedure for you that I think
would accomplish the same thing. That would be for us to provide the summary and
include in the summary a statement that the rule was suspended if in fact that's what
you choose to do. As opposed to changing the title because what we do is we prepare
the Ordinances not presuming ahead of time that you will suspend the rule and
promulgate them that way. Then we have to go back and change the title of the
Ordinance after the fact. It would be more efficient for us to simply prepare the summary
afterwards as opposed to re-doing the first page of the title. So, I would suggest that to
you, The state statute does not require that it be in the title, just simply that you can
suspend the rute, at least as I read it.
De Weerd: (inaudible).
Nary: Madam Preside'nt.
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Nary.
Nary: Since I'm the one that brought it up, and I think that's a great suggestion that Mr.
Nichols has because what I was going to ask is, the state statute does require that the
Council approve the summary and the summary does not include it in the prior
Ordinance. Since we do have to approve it and I don't know, this is a pretty short
Ordinance. I don't know, you could print the whole thing. It's not that long. But, as long
as it's reflected so that --. My only concern is that a member of the public were to read
that they would know how the process was done, that we followed the state statute. Mr.
Nichols is correct, it doesn't require that it be in the title of the Ordinance. My only intent
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlllg
January 22, 2002
Page 26 of 46
was to make sure that people noticed that we did do it that way. We are required to
pass the summary anyway. That is required by state statute. If we're going to do a
summary for this one or any other Ordinance, we have to have the summary before us
as well with the ordinance. So, that's fine as long as it's going to be in the summary.
That's fine with me.
Nichols: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nichols,
Nichols: Madam President, Councilman Nary. If we were to include in the Ordinance
form itself, a place where the clerk could note whether there was a suspension of the
requirement of the three readings, then it could appear in the Ordinance, summary if
need be could also reflect that and that way we can have it ahead of time so we don't
have to do something post-fact. That's all. I'm just trying to make sure that we only do it
once, If that would satisfy the Council, then we could change the Ordinance form to so
reflect on the Ordinance itself and then the clerk can note that when it's adopted.
Nary: I have no problem with that. That sounds like a great way to do it.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion?
Bird: Mr. Nary, make the motion.
Nary: I did miss, is the Ordinance number not 847 for this Ordinance?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Nary: 937?
De Weerd: It's 02-937.
Bird: I'll take your lead.
Nary: I think if I've g6t everything Mr. Nichols said. What I would do then, Council is
move that we adopt Ordinance No. 02-937 for the City of Meridian amending Ordinance
No. 847 to amend section two of chapter five in title one the Meridian City Code for the
City of Meridian providing for the designation of the Valley Times as the official
newspaper of the City of Meridian, providing an effective date and noting in the
summary to be published with the Ordinance that the majority of the Council by vote has
approved a suspension of the rules to pass this at this meeting reflecting all the rest of
the Ordinance as presented to us.
Bird: Second,
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlllg
January 22, 2002
Page 27 of 46
De Weerd: I think our motion is longer than the Ordinance but I hope you don't think I'm
going to repeat that one. The motion is to approve Ordinance No. 02-937 designating
the Valley Times as the official newspaper of the City of Meridian and providing an
effective date. All those in favor say aye.
Nary: Don't we need a roll call vote for that?
De Weerd: I'm sorry. Roll call. I'm just way ahead of myself on this.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Nary, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: I would like Mr, Nary to repeat it though,
Nary: Just have to play back the tape.
Item 7.
Ordinance No.
Prosecutors with Boise City:
Cross-Deputization of
Item 8.
Public Hearing: Public Work's Fees and Adjustments:
De Weerd: Okay, item NO.7 was pulled so we move onto item No.8 which is a Public
Hearing on the Public Works fees and adjustments. So, I'll open the Public Hearing and
ask staff for any comments.
Watson: Thank you Madam President and Council Members. Gary is going to hand out
a rather thick packet of materials to you on this subject.
De Weerd: Thanks Gary.
Watson: Before I go over some of this, just so you know, all of these will be up on the
screen if there's one that we need to look at a little closer. If you have any specific
questions we can go back to those. The development and implementation of Public
Works review and inspection fees has been going off and on for about the last 12
months. We've finally gotten these together and just wanted to kind of go over the
basics of how these were calculated and what they're going to do for us. The proposed
fees are based on two different ideas, I guess you would- say. The first one is they're
based on time estimated to complete a task. I conducted interviews with all the staff
members to conservatively estimate median number of hours spent on each task.
Before I go any farther, if you have any questions please stop me. If I'm going into too
much detail please stop me. I just want to be thorough and make sure that I head you
off, you know I've done my homework.
De Weerd: Okay Brad, thank you.
Meridian City Council Regular Meellllg
January 22, 2002
Page 28 of 46
Watson: These number of hours were based on typical subdivision commercial projects.
Inspection fees were calculated a little differently. They were based on funding a
majority of our inspection costs through fees. We took the total annual costs and
roughly divided those by the quantity of inspections for water, sewer, and drainage they
do. One new concept that none of the other cities have is a re-review fee on commercial
projects, We proposed a 50 percent of the initial review fee on re-submittals for
commercial projects. This is intended to stem the chronic problem of certain commercial
projects and their consultants not addressing our redline comments, ignoring them or
ignoring our checklists. The second way the proposed fees were determined, were
based on some time records that our engineering techs kept last spring. For a couple
months they kept records of how much time they spent on certain subdivisions, how
many lots it had, how many feet of water or sewer. I took the hours that they estimated
based on their interviews and compared them to the time records and came up with
what I thought was a reasonable amount. Those are listed in the first spreadsheet that's
showing on the screen.
De Weerd: Brad is this more to reward the developers to submit things in a timely
manner and do pay attention to your red-lines?
Watson: Madam President, that's a very good way of looking at it, is a reward.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Watson: The first two sheets that you have are actually copies of the legal notice that
went into the paper. The third sheet is what is shown up on the screen that shows our
basis of calculation. We assigned a personnel type to each one of those tasks. I already
talked about how the hours were arrived at. We have a billing rate. I went back through
and looked at wages, benefits, overheads, support staff and incorporated those all into
the billing rate. Nobody in our department makes anywhere near those amounts. Just
so no one is confused about that. The next thing that we did is go through some
examples for both subdivision development and commercial projects. For the
subdivisions we picked six different examples and just ran the figures through on those.
Some of those included lift stations. Some didn't. Some included Homeowners
Association pressurized irrigation systems and some didn't. The average total fee per
lot was about $184.00 ranging from 106 to 248. Review fees averaged about $41.00 per
lot with a range of 25 to 77. Inspection fees were 140 on the average per lot ranging
from 79 to 175. Those ranges are pretty wide because of the wide range of the facilities
that are within each of those subdivisions. You'll note that the third subdivision over in
that listing is rather high. It had lift stations. It had a huge quantity of water and sewer in
it. We also looked at six commercial projects to see what impact these fees might have.
Again we selected a range of projects ranging from the very small, a developed lot that
already had water and sewer services stubbed to it, all the way up to something like an
elementary school that had to construct it's own public water and sewer. The review and
inspection fees totaled anywhere from about $500.00 all the way up to almost $7,000.00
on a large apartment complex. You will note in those examples that I included historical
data on the re-reviews and figured those in. you can see that sort of in the middle of this
Meridian City Council Regular Meelll,g
January 22, 2002
Page 29 of 46
red sheet. The actual fees wouldn't have been nearly as high on those two large
projects except for the high number of re-reviews.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Brad, I noticed this less than ringing endorsement from the Building Contractor's
Association at the back. Is that the general gist of the comments you've seen from the
development community is this doesn't seem out of line?
Watson: Councilman Nary, Madam President, and Council members. I was going to
kind of speak to that towards the end and address what their comments were.
Nary: Sorry to (inaudible).
Watson: No that's okay.
De Weerd: I won't make an attorney's (inaudible).
Watson: After we did the examples, we proceeded to project based on fiscal year 01
what our revenue might be. The next couple pages show revenue projections from both
subdivision development and commercial applications. The subdivision projection is
much firmer, so to speak, than the commercial. It's very easy to get at those quantities.
The commercial applications are a little more difficult without going through each
individual one to determine whether there was public water or sewer on them and
digging up the area of their drainage review. A little bit more of estimation on my part.
The total revenue projected to Public Works on all of these is --. Let me find it again.
Well, it's in the neighborhood of 260,000. The third page there that has a couple little pie
charts on the bottom. Those show approximately how much of the total Public Works
budget that is devoted to development would be funded by these fees. I did take out
support staff or personnel that aren't involved in the development process subtracted
that out of our total budget. As you can see these fees are projected to provide about 38
percent of out total revenue. One thing to note is the water department inspectors are
included in that budget amount. As I stated earlier, inspection fees would provide
around 80 percent of the total inspection budget. The review related fees are
substantially lower and are projected to only provide about 20 percent of the revenue
required to run the development part of the department. I believe the next page you
have is just some statistics if you're interested. The next sheet in your packet and on the
screen attempts to compare these fees with others for Nampa and Boise City and as
Shari stated when she presented her fees, this is a little bit of an apples and oranges
scenario. I purposely didn't even look at these until I was done with mine because I
wanted to see --. I didn't want to be influenced by what they were charging. But that is
there for your comparison. The one thing that I didn't note right up front is that these are
all new fees except for sewer system inspection. It was by Ordinance $2.31 per lineal
foot, although that was not implemented. So this is quite a reduction from that. It's
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlllg
January 22, 2002
Page 30 of 46
substantially lower than Boise City's. It seems to be in the ballpark of what Nampa's is
although they have a sliding scale.
De Weerd: Brad, on the sewer system inspection fees, you said it was over $2.00 a
lineal foot and now it's at $1.007
Watson: Madam President. That is correct. It was 231. Boise City's used to be 231. I
think that's why that figure was picked years ago. Boise City has since dropped theirs.
Again, I didn't look at theirs when I was developing this. I tried to equate total inspection
budget with needed revenue, then backed it off to about 80 percent. It just so happened
to come out pretty close to $1.00. $1.00 seemed like a good even number for right now,
rather than 103 or 98 cents. So that's what it is. That's what I propose. J'II move on to
the next part. I think included in your packet are just two sample invoices we've worked
with our new department specialist. She created these invoices so that everyone knows
right up front how to calculate these. She could do it. The planner (inaudible) can do it.
That sort of (inaudible) into the discussion on the building contractor's association, the
presentation and letter of today. The one comment that they were adamant about was
that these fees would not be payable until plat signature. That's what drove the creation
of this form so that we weren't collecting money up front that we would just collect it at
the end. That's on the subdivisions, not on the building permit side, obviously it would
be calculated during the review and paid with the building permit. That seemed to be
their primary concern when I presented it to them in December. There was quite a
group there, very familiar faces to all of you. I could list them by name probably but
there were developers, planners, engineers. There was a couple there that I assume
are house builders but I didn't recognize them. I think there was a group of about 20 and
I didn't recognize three of them just from them being here. They seemed to agree at the
time that fees were necessary. Part of my argument during that presentation was that
the existing water end user ratepayers are subsidizing development by paying our
salaries, paying our operating budget. I told them that I didn't want development to pay
all of it. They argued that new development benefited existed ratepayers, which I guess
is a philosophical discussion for you. My initial aim was to get between 30 and 40
percent funding out of these fees. We've done that. I've hit 38 but I did tell them that
these would be reviewed annually as we have better data, statistics on how long things
took. They seemed okay with that. The letter that I got today and I assume it was CCed
to you even without hElVing it in that packet. Maybe not, was that they hoped this
increase in fees will result in a subsequent in output on behalf of the Public Works
department. I just wrote a few words here. This is my first reaction to that. Output has
been increased dramatically over the last 12 months by one hiring additional inspectors,
two hiring additional engineering technician, which is the plan reviewer. We streamlined
the process by postponing as many requirements as possible to pJat signature stage
through the process improvement group. This allows their construction to take place
much earlier than it did prior to a year ago. There's currently no plan review backlog and
plans are returned to consultants within two to three days depending on project
complexity a vast majority of the time. So, to me, we have improved and now the bill is
due, is kind of how I'm looking at it. We have geared up to meet the increase of the
Meridian City Council Regular Meellllg
January 22, 2002
Page 31 of 46
development demand. So, I guess that's my response to this letter, Councilman Nary.
That's all [ have. I would be happy to answer any questions.
De Weerd: Brad, I think you've put together a very comprehensive packet to support the
information and the fees that you're proposing. I sure appreciate all the detail that
you've included in this and all the work I'm sure that was behind it. This is very
impressive.
Watson: Thank you.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: (inaudible),
Nary: Madam President. I guess I would just make one comment. I guess I perceive
the comment in here from the BCA and from Mr. Clow is, I don't know. I guess I just
thought it was sort of a generic sort of comment. I wasn't thinking --. I think it's certainly
easy to tell in a review process exactly what you just said Brad. You can show timelines
and how processes have improved in timing and when projects come in and when
projects go out and things like that. I mean, [ think in the future if that's somebody's
concern that's pretty easy thing to show because I think you have provided a
tremendous amount of detail. I think it's very helpful to us and it appears to be
reasonable in light of the neighboring communities and what they would charge. I think
it's reasonable and (inaudible) and I think you've hit the target exactly the way it should
be done. Evaluating what we're doing and trying to meet that need and evaluating all
those costs. We're not getting --. The City is not getting rich off of this. This is really just
meeting the needs that we're providing. I think it's very good. I wasn't too concerned
about his letter. I think it's something that we see a lot of. It's just a generic sort of
frustration; everybody wants it yesterday kind of comment.
Watson: Thank you Councilman Nary. I just couldn't let it go without a rebuttal.
Nary: That's okay.
De Weerd: Thank you" This is a Public Hearing and certainly our Public Works knows
how to clear a room. Is there any member of the public who would like to comment?
Since we know both -
*** End of Side Two ***
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we close the Public Hearing.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 32 of 46
Nary: Second,
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing. All those
in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Okay, any discussion?
Bird: I have none,
De Weerd: Do we have a motion?
Bird: Cherie,
Nary: It's your turn.
Bird: It's Cherie's turn because she's Public Works.
McCand less: (inaudible).
Nichols: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Madam President. A couple of items if I may, One is we usually like to have
these presented in the form or attached to a resolution by the Council adopting fees.
That's one of the things that we do resolutions on, adopting fees. Secondly you need to
discuss what is the effective date for these fees.
McCandless: Yes.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: A question for Mr. Watson. Then I'll make a motion on a resolution. What would
you like the effective dates to be Brad? Councilman Bird, Madam President, Council
Members. March 1st to April 1st. I know it depends a little bit on Bill's schedule and the
whole drafting of the ordinance and all that but whatever is possible and as soon as
possible. The one thing to point out, if it could only be effected to applications that came
in for Preliminary Plat, CUP, Annexation after that date. I don't want to tag anybody
that's got a Preliminary in now.
Meridian Cily Council Regular MeellJlIJ
January 22, 2002
Page 33 of 46
Bird: Anything that's in the works now Brad will not be effected. Whatever effective day
it will be brand new projects from then on. Is that right?
Watson: That's my recommendation, yes.
Bird: That's what mine would be. (inaudible).
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Is it, I don't know Mr. Nichols schedule. Is a couple weeks, our first meeting in
February. Is that adequate to have a resolution? We could make the effective date
March 1 51?
Nichols: Councilman Nary, Members of the Council. We can have it for your first
meeting in February with an effective date of March 1st.
Nary: Great.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we instruct the attorney to draw up a resolution regarding the
Public Works fees and adjustments with the effective date of March 1,2002.
Nary: Second,
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? Okay, Mr. Clerk.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Nary, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye,
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 10.
Discussion of City Seal! Logo:
De Weerd: We've already heard item No.9, In front of you for item No. 10, discussion of
the City Seal. At our workshop it was discussed. Several options were discussed. This
is what I got back right before the meeting. So, this is kind of my first viewing on it too.
Well, first if people have any observations or is this kind of what you had in mind? Is
there any comment?
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 34 of 46
Bird: I think this has incorporated everything we asked you to get back in it. You know,
we've got the water tower. We've got since 1893. You've got the tower, got the little deal
there. I really worry how busy this is going - how this is going to work on the sides of --.
You know on the vehicles and on our letterheads and stuff, if it's going to be too busy. I
think this first page, or my first page, this one here with the plainer house probably --.
Though [ like this better, I'm not too sure that isn't going too busy. You went back and
incorporated everything we asked you to. So, [ don't think we have any complaints.
De Weerd: Any other comments?
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr, Nary.
Nary: [f I recall, the second page, the one that's more detailed, the intent was that
would be like a letterhead type of logo.
De Weerd: Yes.
Nary: The more lined type of drawing on the first page was intended for trucks and
cars and those types of things. Is that the intent?
De Weerd: Shirts and pens --.
Nary: Shirts and pens --.
De Weerd: You know anything other than official City letterhead.
Nary: What I'm wondering - and not to throw a monkey wrench into this because I note,
I guess there was some discussion. I wasn't on the Council at that time but in the
individual departments is there an opportunity for the individual department with this,
with the simpler drawing, the one that might be on a truck or a police car or something
like that to incorporate som~thing relative to the department?
De Weerd: (inaudible)
Nary: I don't know if that's ever been discussed so I was just curious.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary it has. In the early on discussions they did offer, they moved the
Idaho right by the n and inserted the department name right under Meridian.
Nary: Is that something still contemplated?
De Weerd: Yes.
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlllg
January 22,2002
Page 35 of 46
Nary: Or would this be it?
De Weerd: This is something that the departments can incorporate their department
names into in assuming the City Seal or Logo.
Nary: So basically what we're --. If we're going to decide tonight, and I agree with Mr.
Bird. I think this is exactly what we had talked about last time. We'd be picking basically
one on the first page and one on the second page. Basically the location of that since
1893 is really the only difference between the three?
De Weerd: That's correct.
Nary: I think it looks good. I think it incorporates the things we've talked about in the
past.
De Weerd: It's your preference, you know. I'm kind of thinking that that middle one
seems to flow the best of them because of the base of the water tower. By putting the
wording next to it to the right, it does tie it in a little bit better than just having that base
just stick out there.
Nary: Yes, I would concur, I think that one where it's inside the water tower almost
obscures the fact that that's what it is.
De Weerd: Right.
McCandless: Yes.
Bird: I agree with you.
Nary: And the one on the bottom, it doesn't make it seem like, if you didn't know what it
was, you'd have really no idea it's related to the design. So, the middle one does seem
the best to me.
McCandless: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: By the same token the one on the second page, the middle one that is
going to be used on the stationery would be my choice for the stationery for the same
reasons,
De Weerd: Thank you.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council Regular Mee\1I1g
January 22, 2002
Page 36 of 46
Bird: I think that we're looking at two of them and I think the middle one would be my
choice on both pages. (inaudible)
De Weerd: Yes,
McCandless: Yes.
Bird: I like it.
De Weerd: Do you think we might get a City Seal tonight?
Bird: Get a what?
De Weerd: [s there any opportunity or anyone willing to make a motion? Or are we not
at that stage? I see there's a comment. Mr, Thomason, do you want to come forward?
Thomason: Frank Thomason of the Valley Times. Is this what you're looking at?
Bird: Yes.
De Weerd: Yes.
Thomason: I would just ask if you might want to consider changing the year to 1903
since that's the actual municipal centennial, 1893 (inaudible).
Bird : Yes, 1903 is the actual -
Thomason: -- Masonic lodge in the community as a whole.
McCandless: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: Frank, yo"u've ~got the second page of the first page, it looks like.
Thomason: Oh, I got this at the workshop. This may not even be what you're looking at
tonight. I was just (inaudible).
De Weerd: Oh, here.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: The first page is (inaudible).
Thomason: You're right I was looking at the --, But, in any event the (inaudible).
Meridian City Council Regular Meetlllg
January 22, 2002
Page 37 of 46
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Thomason: Never mind it's already been done. Corrected by notation on the copy that
(inaud ible).
Bird: I just did that. I agree with Frank. I knew that 1903 was our centennial, actual
centennial.
Thomason: Right, like the municipal versus the entire community,
Bird: Yes.
Thomason: Thank you.
De Weerd: Council, Councilman Bird did raise an item we might want to delay and put
this on our agenda for February 5th so the Mayor will have a chance to look at this and
have an opportunity to comment. I will kind of pass the original down. It does have the
color that was talked about way back when with the slate blue and the gray so you have
a chance to --.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we table the discussion on the City Seal and logo until February
5,2002.
De Weerd: Do we have a second?
McCandless: Second.
De Weerd: Okay, there's been a motion and a second to move discussion of the City
Seal, or action on the City Seal Logo to February 5,2002. Any further discussion?
Smith: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Smith.
Smith: May I make a comment on the Seal?
De Weerd: Yes, please,
Meridian City Council Regular MeetlllY
January 22, 2002
Page 38 of 46
Smith: I was wondering if the water tower, it's a little non-descript as compared to the
detail on the other items that are shown there. I was wondering if it could be moved up a
little bit into the oval and perhaps the, since 1903 be shown to the left of the water tower
and maybe below Idaho? Would that be --? If my description is --.
De Weerd: You want to move since 1903, up into the oval?
Smith: Yes, just below Idaho, below the word Idaho.
Bird: What are you doing with the water tower Gary?
Smith: Moved it up too.
Bird: Inside the --?
Smith: Into the oval.
Bird: Into the oval?
De Weerd: That's what it was at our workshop-
Smith: Oh, was it? Okay.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: Madam President.
Smith: I think that's where I got the idea.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I think the reason we didn't want to move that up in there Gary was so that if
somebody wanted to put liK~ the police department or the fire department within that,
they had a little more room to, or Public Works department or however you want to --. If
we move that water tower up in there, then we're taking some of that area out of that
inside that we wanted to put each department on their trucks or vehicles or whatever.
That was the reasoning behind my thinking.
Smith: Okay, thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you for your suggestion though, Gary. Okay. There's been call for
the question. All those in favor of putting this on the February 5th agenda please say
aye.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 39 of 46
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Thank you Mr. Clerk. Yes sir, are we having a Council meeting on the other
side of the podium here?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Do you guys need a break or can we move onto No. 11? Hello?
Bird: Lets keep going.
De Weerd: Would you like a break?
Nary: Your preference.
McCandless: No.
Item 11.
Discussion of Cell Tower Draft Ordinance:
De Weerd: We'll move onto item No. 11, discussion of cell tower draft ordinance. Shari,
I sure appreciate your staff's quick action on bringing this to our agenda.
Stiles: Well, Madam President, Council Members. I didn't see this before it was sent to
you, this particular version, I can't see that it's complete. I don't know if there's pages
missing. We had stuff in it before in regard to a fall zone. There's absolutely nothing in
here that talks about a setback of any kind. The only thing I can see that's even
remotely related to a setback would be on the third page under B-1-C that says no part
of any antennae, disc, radio, or other such item attached to a communications tower
shall be permitted to overhang the right-of-way or property line. So, that could mean
that, you know the mono-pole is three feet from the --. I apologize. I guess you could
look at this and just make any comments that you might make. I've made some on the
first page under B-1 that we also need to include visitors and we're trying to facilitate
telecommunications for them as well because we have a lot of people come in and visit,
that they certainly use those facilities a lot. More definitions are needed. Stealth tower is
not defined. -
De Weerd: Shari would it be helpful if we delay this to the fourth Tuesday of February?
Stiles: Yes, unfortunately. I'm sorry.
De Weerd: I do know that the Treasure Valley Partnership is also looking at this in a
regional perspective. I believe that Boise's also developing a cell tower Ordinance.
There might be other avenues. I know the Treasure Valley Partnership is kind of doing a
collaborative type of thing. You might want to talk to the Mayor on what information that
he might have from the other municipalities.
Meridian City Council Regular MeetlJlg
January 22, 2002
Page 40 of 46
Stiles: Or, I could talk to Elizabeth Connor on --. I know that David did look at several
sources, He looked at the City of Eagle, AIC had some proposed telecommunications,
or they have some model ordinances that they make. He looked at the other cities. I
think he used Boise too. I thought Boise was pretty restrictive on their cell towers. The
first draft that we ever came up with, if you remember was 20 pages or something. It
was very long. That was kind of when Eagle was doing their cell tower ordinance which
is probably 50 pages long. They had a fall zone of twice the height of the tower. It could
have made it impossible for anybody to even build one. Again, I apologize and I'll have
one to you well in advance of the fourth meeting in February.
De Weerd: Council, any comments?
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Shari, when we've discussed this and stuff, reading through this --. I haven't read
word for word but just skimming it. I don't think that we are restrictive enough in here.
Stiles: I know. (inaudible)
Bird: This one is nothing. I'll take your eight page one any day to be truthful with you. I
think we've got to be very restrictive on this kind of usage. Can you believe that, hearing
it from me? But I do believe that this something that we need to be very restrictive on.
De Weerd: Well, in particular I think in residential areas or commercial areas that are
surrounded by residential. I guess it's not as necessary in an industrial zone that you
know, unless it borders on a residential area. I would agree with Council Member Bird.
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: The other thing too, Shari, working through it, I guess what would be helpful to me
is at least a reference in the ordinance that there is a federal act that is controlling to a
degree for certain types and this is obviously to deal with everything to the outside of
that. So, a reference to the federal act so someone reading it is clear we're not trying to
interfere with that or overstep that.
Stiles: You mean --? I'm sorry.
Nary: I mean, just a reference whether it's in the beginning part of the ordinance or
something saying it's not meant to interfere with the requirements in the federal
telecommunications act but it's basically dealing with everything that's allowed under
ordinance to deal with. Then there's no question we're not in conflict with the federal
statute and also maybe when we do get to discussing it, it might be helpful to have a
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 41 of 46
very short memo just summarizing whether it's the comparison we use for surrounding
communities and that we're not in conflict with you know some of these other
communities and that kind of information would be helpful.
Stiles: Okay.
De Weerd: Okay, any other comments?
Bird: I have none. Do you want a motion to approve it?
De Weerd: Yes.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: J would move that we table the discussion of the cell tower draft ordinance to
February 26, 2002.
De Weerd: Okay, is there a second?
Nary: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved to table discussion of the Cell Tower Draft Ordinance
to February 26,2002. Any discussion?
Nary: I just had a question Madam President.
De Weerd: Okay.
Nary: Is this the type of ordinance that would normally be reviewed by the Planning
and Zoning Commission first? If it is, are we reviewing before them? Wouldn't they
review this ordinance before we did?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Stiles: Madam President, Councilman Nary. This was done at the direction of City
Council. They wanted to discuss this in a workshop. So, they just kind of wanted, --.
Since they initiated the process they kind of wanted to see where we were coming from
first to make sure that it was what they intended prior to submitting to P&Z.
Nary: Okay, so what the intent is, is we'll discuss it and then send it back to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for Public Hearing and their discussion and their --?
Stiles: Yes. Since it is a Council directed change.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 42 of 46
Nary: Okay. That's fine. I know they'll have to see it. So, I didn't we were going to
spend our time discussing something and send it back.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary, I think traditionally we've kind of maintained that we could look at
perimeters and kind of make sure that it's kind of in line with what the thoughts were of
staff and Council before it went to the process.
Nary: Sure. That's fine.
De Weerd: We have a motion in front of us to table this to February 26th. All those in
favor say aye,
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 12.
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
De Weerd: Okay, item No. 12. Okay.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Okay. This is to inform you in writing if you so choose that you have the right
to a predetermination hearing at 6:30 P.M. Tuesday January 22,2002 before the Mayor
and City Council to appear in person and be judged on the facts and to defend the claim
made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain
counsel. The service will be discontinued on January 23rd and, half on January 23rd and
half on January 29th unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who
wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? Is that why you're
here Mr. Borup? I think they divide it be residential and commercial.
McCandless: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Clerk,
Berg: Yes, thank you Madam President. You said the 29th and it's actually the 30th. The
two Wednesdays, the 23rd and the 29th would be (inaudible).
Bird: Yes, the 30th.
De Weerd: Okay, sorry I got the dates from Mr. Bird. I guess I should always verify my
facts,
Bird: I thought somebody said the 29th. I thought you said the 29th WilL
De Weerd: Yes, he got that from you. Okay. They are hereby informed that they may
appeal or have the discussion of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court
Meridian City Council Regular Meetulg
January 22, 2002
Page 43 of 46
pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they may appeal their water may be shut
off. The amount of the turn off list is $39, 040.54. I would entertain a motion.
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the delinquency turn off list and that if not paid the
services will be discontinued on January 23, 2002 and January 30, 2002, for the sum of
39,040.54.
De Weerd: Okay, do I have a second?
McCandless: Second.
De Weerd: It's been moved to approve the delinquency for turn offs scheduled for
January 23, 2002 and January 30, 2002. Is there any further discussion?
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I just had a question. Since I haven't received a copy of the City Code yet, is
there a specific City Code Mr. Nichols that requires us to do this? It can't be delegated
to the Public Works Director or somebody?
Nichols: Mr. Nary --. Councilman Nary, Members of the Council. It is in the Meridian
City Code that there is a proposed (inaudible) ability to contest your water bill before the
whole Council if I recall correctly.
Bird: Yes there is.
Nary: I haven't got a code so I don't know. That's why I'm asking.
Bird: You haven't got your book?
Nary: No. Just the Planning and Zoning Code, not the whole City Code.
Bird: I've got a whole codebook.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Nary: No, I was just curious.
McCandless: He (inaudible).
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 44 of 46
Nary: I was just curious. So, there's a specific code provision that --?
Bird: There is.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Mr. Clerk, I don't know if your office is going to be able to get that discussion
on the tape, I'm going to see another inaudible and those drive me nuts.
McCandless: Yes they do,
Bird: Me too.
De Weerd: That means someone was mumbling. Okay. Sorry, we'll get back on track
here, There's a motion on the floor. All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: I did want to ask if we would have a volunteer. With Council Member
Anderson stepping down, we do have a vacancy on the SWAC, which is our Sanitary --.
What does that stand for? Solid waste committee.
Bird: Solid Waste Advisory Committee.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: I would like a volunteer. Oh, I see Cherie. She raised her hand.
Bird: Cherie volunteered.
McCandless: I'm the liaison for that (inaudible).
De Weerd: I think it's very appropriate since you're our MUBS liaison that that would be
a great committee to learn more about your department.
McCandless: I have no idea what you're talking about.
De Weerd: I'm sure you will.
Bird: Yes you will.
De Weerd: Also, Council Anderson was also our alternate for the COMPASS Board.
Would anyone have an interest in being an alternate?
Bird: No.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22, 2002
Page 45 of 46
De Weerd: Don't all jump at once,
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: I think that since Council Member Nary is already in that building when they
meet --.
Nary: I am honestly concerned about potential conflict being involved with the
COMPASS Board.
De Weerd: I think you're very wise in (inaudible). Especially at our next meeting next
week. J think there might be the first opportunity. Council Member Bird?
Bird: I've got a life.
De Weerd: Any of our staff members, would you have an interest in being an alternate?
Gary? Thank you. I didn't even have to twist your arm on that. Okay, thank you very
much. Okay. Council, did you have anything you wanted to discuss? Mr. Bird?
Bird: Madam President, I just want for public record, seeing how we've got an
ordinance that says that our audit will be presented by the --. I think it's the third or
fourth Tuesday of the month of January. I want it to be known publicly that it is out. It is
done. The reason that you had decided not to bring it onto the Council is because you
felt that the Mayor should be here which I wholeheartedly agree with. I do want to let it
be known that the audit is out. It has not been accepted by this Council. So, I don't
believe it is out for the public yet until we accept it. That will be taken care of next week.
De Weerd: Yes. We'll be meeting an hour early to have this presented. It shouldn't take
more than a half-hour, which should give some time between that presentation and the
Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan.
Bird: You bet.
De Weerd: I was under the impression Council Member Bird that it needed to be
presented by the end of January, That's why we did feel that -
Bird: I'd have to look at my deal.
De Weerd: -- it was necessary for the Mayor to be present, I think during that
presentation. Okay. anything further?
Bird: I move we adjourn.
De Weerd: Does staff have anything? No? Okay. I'll entertain your motion Mr. Bird.
Bird: It's there.
Meridian City Council Regular Meeting
January 22,2002
Page 46 of 46
McCandless: Second,
De Weerd: All those in favor of adjourning?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Okay, we adjourn at 8:39.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:39 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
2-;7;02-
DATE APPROVED
ia-~R
~.
~
-;.
~t,.
~~-
!~
:t'
January 18, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22, 2002
APPLICANT Park's Department -- Tom Kuntz ITEM NO.
4-A- !
REQUEST Chamber Expansion -- Restrooms
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY fiRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
vf
ll/~
~J if\'
1/L o;V iV
tl\}lAI~ /' /D
,O.-1t1 \~
{J'-'. rr/
~)rv1" @ ~
r ~ \'Y
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
CC:
Re:
?~ "~/., <' '0 ?<< "?'::'"" """'"~: :??:~S'"^" t- " '\.? ";: ":" ~.::"'H:;. :)7 ":~?::<<"7 :~ f~Y.~~<<,-,~~:~~
'~ Meridian Parks & Recreation ",'::" ':,' :/'" :<,' , 5
~~,i&><<,~ ::,,, ,,'., 0~",~~,F^:i ,,:~~,~:~,~,~;.~,,<%',: y~~~i;4}~~i:+~~::,i~i'~~~~1i~
RECEIVED
JAN 1 7 2002
CITY OF }illRIDL-L'f
Mayor Corrie and City Council
Tom Kuntz
January 17, 2002
Parks and Recreation Commission
Agenda items for the January 221 2002 City Council Meeting
The Parks and Recreation Department request that the following items be placed on the
January 22 Council agenda:
1. Namina the 58MAcre Park - The Parks and Recreation Commission voted at their
December meeting to recommend the 58-Acre Park be named, "Freedom Park".
Attached to this memo is a list of all the names that were suggested by citizens. We
are requesting from the City Council formal adoption of a name for our city park.
2. Chamber Expansion Restrooms - At the January 8th workshop, we presented an
estimate of $75,000 to complete the restroom expansion at Storey Park. Our
budgeted amount was $63,000. We met with the Beniton Company and they were
able to reduce the construction estimate to $68,798 through in-kind donations (see
attachment). We are reviewing other possibilities of additional savings and will
present that information along with a final estimate at your February workshop.
Information Onlv
Skate Park -- We do not have all of the information necessary to make a
recommendation to City Council and request the issue be placed on the February 5th
agenda.
58 Acre Park -- We reviewed our options with our Public Works Department in
regards to sewer and it appears our best option is to remove the restroom from
Phase [ construction so we can go out to bid in February. Depending on the approval
of Cedar Springs it could be June before our sewer plans are approved for the park.
\\SusieJ<\cIMy Documents\1 - AdminislrationlMisc, JobslMemos\111 - Blank Memo,doc
Page 1
Cost Update / Comparison
January 18, 2002
The original budget was based on the drawings dated 7/4/01 that included a floor plan
[A 1.0) and elevations [A2.o and A2.1 J, 1/18/02
Parks Department Restrooms
Activity 7/18/01 1/18/02
General Conditions $ 7,679.00 1 0,084.00
Siteworkl Demolition $ 6,670.00 4,1 31 .00
Landscape 1 Irrigation $ 0.00 0.00
Concrete foundations, walks 1 floor patching $ 4,561,00 5,508,00
Masonry $ 8,798.00 9,488,00
Rough carpentry 1 Trusses $ 6,386.00 3,001.00
Finish carpentry 1 casework $ 0.00 0.00
Roofing, insulation and sealants $ 2,189.00 2,116,00
E.I.F.S, $ 1,603.00 In Drywall
Doors and hardware $ 2,097.00 4,225.00
Drywall $ 550.00 782.00
Painting $ 2,431.00 0.00
Specialties [bath access/Toilet Part.] $ 1 ,868.00 4,254.00
Plumbing 1 HVAC $ 15,707.00 20,441 .00
Electrical $ 3,227.00 4,767.00
TOTAL 112 63,886,00 68,788.00
Chamber Remodel and Addition
Activity 7/18/01 1/18/02
General Conditions $ 11,516.00 15,126.00
Siteworkl Demolition $ 6,289.00 5,001.00
Landscape 1 Irrigation $ 0.00 0.00
Concrete foundations, walks 1 floor patching $ 4,733.00 5,511.00
Masonry $ 7,870.00 6,1 30,00
Rough carpentry 1 Trusses $ 12,617.00 6,768.00
Finish carpentry 1 casework $ 8,408.00 8,012.00
Roofing, insulation, sealants, rain gutters $ 5,678.00 4,087.00
E.l.F.S. $ 1,075.00 0.00
Doors and hardware $ 2,016,00 2,345.00
Storefront Doors and Windows $ 7,027.00 0.00
Drywall $ 9,874.00 2,390.00
Floor Covering $ 3,269.00 3,940.00
Painting $ 2,670.00 0.00
Specialties [bath access/Toilet Part.) $ 269.00 212.00
Plumbing 1 HVAC $ 10,942,00 11,066,00
Electrical $ 11 ,562,00 5,296,00
TOTAL 112 105,815,00 75,883,00
January 18, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
January 22,2002
ITEM NO.
10
REQU EST Discussion of City Seal/logo
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FI RE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
}i1/
~
~~
{j /011
~/
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property 0' the City of Meridian.
J
J"'.
);
~k:-
C/2
Nl'eR ~-{
0/ lite TREA5\.W\E -..J NY
IDAHO
);
"/<S'
Q~~
lVl'E:R ~-{
'!/ Ihe TREA5'-J\~..E '\j ~
CITY OF
v
IDAHO
))
"k:-
C/S:
-Nl'eR x,-{
0/ Ihe T REA5\J~'"€- -..J,..YJ
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
?:
..<~
OS
^t1'I2A ~-{
~ th". TREASURE. y,
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
?:
..<~
OS
Iv-r12A #-{
~th". TREASURE. y,
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
./:
"<0
O&,
^t1'I2A f,.-{
~ th". TREASURE. Y ~
SINCE ~
1893
CITY OF
eridiern
IDAHO
CITY OF
eridiern
IDAHO
/:
'<0-
('-2
Pv?, Eft €,'-l
<Yilt" TREASURE V~
CITY OF
eridiern
IDAHO
~
~C
I2PvI'I2FT €,'-l
<Yilt" TREASURE V~
~W8r ~)
II
V
"
c/
h
/./13'
Ce . , \:....{
NTc ~/
R 0/ tlt~ TRS"s0\'t€. '-J
;
I.
C\11' OF-
eridiai1.~j~
\D0.\-\0
I
I
OSmCf.
r ) \ ~ a93
~fl
CeNT ~...{
cE{ 0/ did TRE"s\J?-~ '-J ~
in.
. "
"".-'
'7 f\~
CfrY Of ;.-:,-.~~' .-
eridiah
lDrJ-\O
I
V.
if
h
/.'13'
Ce f
NTcR -...J N>:<(.-....
0/ lh~ TRE"s\J?-~
(
** TX CONFIRMh .IN REPORT **
AS OF FEB 28 '02 11:32 PAGE,01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
21 02/28 11:31 2088840744
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDU STATUS
EC--S 00'20" 001 160 OK
----------~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
eridia-;;"-~..o(
lOAHO
\
t
I
I
V
Y
jj'
qlNCE
f( ~903
CITY OF
IDAH 0
'\
)
OSlNCE
J ( \ 903
eridian
)}
....Y.(y
C.s:
1I/'I'Sl"( ~
!Yt-f.. TREAS\J'i\~ V
January 18, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22, 2002
APPLICANT Public Work's Department -- Gary Smith ITEM NO. 4-B- 1
REQUEST ACHD Projects - Agreements for Professional Services with Civil Survey Consultants
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERI DIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See attached
JU
a~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Glcnn K. f3cnnctt, P.L.S.
Prcsident
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 10 I
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)8884312
Fax 888-0323
Timothy A. Burgcss, PE
Vice President
December 6, 2001
Brad Watson, P.E,
City Engineer
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID 83642
~ETVED
DEe 0 7 2001
MeRIDIAN CITY ENGINEER
Re: Franklin, Locust Grove, & Overland Roads - Water and Sewer Improvements
In Conjunction With ACHD Projects
Dear Brad:
Thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants to provide professional services for water and sewer
improvements for the referenced projects. These improvements will be incorporated into the ACHD
roadway design packages currently under design. We propose to provide services based upon the
sketches and written comments received from the City during our meeting on 11128/01. The utility
plans shall match the limits of each separate ACHD project. Six different plan sets are proposed as
follows:
(I 1.
/\(r E 2,
..., ......... '>
J,
4.
d Dr.:: ( 5.
-;
( 6.
Franklin Road (East First to Nola)
Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian)
Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin)
Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection (including Locust Grove south ofI-84)
Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove)
Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle)
Following are detailed Scopes of Service for each project with a man-hour and cost estimate for your
reference. Again, thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants for these projects.
Sincerely,
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
M~
Matt Hart, P .E,
Encl,
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Meridian City
Water and Sewer Improvements
Summary of all Projects
rOlect otal Man ,Hours Cost Estimate
Franklin Road (East First to NoJa) -~.~- 233 $14,925.00
-_._~ .__c,.____.___~._~
Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian) -.. 233 $14,925.00
Locust Grove/Overland Intersection ..- .T52~--- .- $9,795.00
Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin) -~~"."._,- 152 $9,795.00 - -
Overland Road (Meridian to Locust Grove) _m__~167-- $10,745,00
Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle) --- 167 $10,745.00
Total 1.104 $70,930.00
p .
T
Mendlan.UtllIty.xls
12/6/01
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC.
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No,
THIS AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF MERIDIAN. hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT" and CIVIL SURVEY
CONSULTANTS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSC" is made and entered into this _day of
, 200 I. The CLIENT and CSC in consideration of their mutual covenants
herein agree as set forth below.
The Client intends to construct new water and sewer system improvements in conjunction with the Ada County Highway
District's project to reconstruct Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road), ACHD Project No. 502005.0,
hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT,
CLIENT INFORMATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT will provide to CSC a full and complete description of the PROJECT including; all design criteria, information
as to CLIENT's requirements for the PROJECT, design objectives and constraints, capacity and performance requirements,
flexibility and expandability needs, any budgetary limitations, and copies of all design and construction standards which
CLIENT will require to be incorporated in the Drawings and Specifications.
The CLIENT will also provide to CSC al] associated project information including data prepared by others; soil borings,
probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys; laboratory tests and inspection reports of samples, materials and
equipment; studies and interpretations of all environmental assessment and impact statements; surveys of record; propelty
descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; title reports; other special data or consultations as may be
avai]able; all of which CSC may use and rely upon in perfol"llling services under this Agreement.
The CLIENT will obtain permission for CSC to enter upon public and private property as required for CSC to perform
services under this Agreement.
SER VICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CSC
CSC will provide services as outlined in the attached letter dated December 6, 200 I.
BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The Client will pay ~S.C for services provided under this Agreement per the attached letter dated December 6, 2001,
Notice to Proceed, either verbal or written, shall constitute acceptance of this Agreement by the CLIENT. THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE CLIENT AGREES TO SAID TERMS AND
CONDITIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho A venue
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc,
100 South Adkins Way, Suite] 0]
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Meridian, Idaho 83642
BY:
TITLE:
~~
/2 -. 7 - 0 (
BY:
TITLE:
wo
1 of4
12/6/01
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL - CSC shall provide for CLIENT professional engineering andlor land surveying services for the Project
described in this Agreement. These services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices
for the intended use of the project. CSC makes no other warranty either expressed or implied.
CSC shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of any pmty involved in the Project other than their own, CSC shall not
be responsible for failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations
issued by CSC.
CSC has not been retained to supervise, direct or have control over Contractor's work, CSC specifically does not have
authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to
comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their
work, Accordingly, CSC can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s) failure to tilrnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
The CLIENT understands and agrees that subsurface and soils characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals. CSC will coordinate this work in accordance with generally accepted practice of the professional
services being provided and makes no other warranties expressed or implied or as to the professional advice furnished by
professionals providing soils testing or geotechnical advice.
Resetting of survey andlor construction stakes shall constitute extra work and shall be paid for on a time and material basis in
addition to any other payment provided in this Agreement.
OPINIONS OF COST - CSC may be asked to provide opinions of construction or PROJECT costs as part of the professional
services under this Agreement. The CLIENT understands and agrees that CSC has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, The CLIENT understands that CSC opinions of cost are based on CSC experience
and represents CSe's judgment based on that experience, but CSC does not guarantee or warranty that either quotes, bids or
estimates prepared by contractors, subcontractors or other will not deviate from opinions prepared by CSc. The CLIENT
agrees to employ an independent cost estimator if the CLIENT desires additional assurance, warranty or guarantee of
PROJECT costs.
Should the CLIENT request that CSC modify any PROJECT aspect to reduce construction costs, then those services shall be
considered additionaJ and beyond the scope of th is Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement.
REUSE OF DOCUMENTS - CSC shall retain an ownership interest of all professional products prepared by CSC. The
CLIENT agrees that no product will be reused without specific written permission of CSc. The CLIENT agrees to
indemnity and hold CSC harmless from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising from unauthorized reuse of all
work products prepared by CSC for the PROJECT.
GOVERNING LA W - Unless otherwise provided in an addendum, the taw of the State of Idaho will govern the validity of
this Agreement, its interpretation and performance, and remedies for contract breach or any other claims related to this
Agreement.
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. CLIENT and CSC each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CLIENT and CSC are likewise bound to the other patty to this Agreement, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obi igations of this Agreement.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than
CLIENT and CSC, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement wi II be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of CLIENT and CSC and not for the benefit of any other party.
wo
2of4
12/6/01
TIMES OF PAYMENTS - CSC shall submit monthly statements for services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses
incurred. CLIENT shall make prompt monthly payments, If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CSC for services and
expenses with in thirty (30) days after receipt of CSe's statement therefor, the amounts due CSC will be increased at the rate
of 1.5% per month from said tenth day, and in addition, CSC may, after giving ten days' written notice to CLIENT, suspend
services under this Agreement unti I CSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
TERM INA TION - The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be term inated by either party upon
thirty days' written notice, Such termination shall be based upon substantial lack of performance by the other party under the
terms and conditions of this Agreement when said substantial lack of performance is through no fault of the terminating
party. If this Agreement is terminated by either party, CSC shall be paid for services rendered and for reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of such termination.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND ASBESTOS - The CLIENT and CSC agree that the work covered in this Agreement does not
anticipate either the presence or remediation of hazardous waste and/or asbestos. Hazardous materials may exist where there
is not reason to believe they should be present. CSC and the CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous
materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or termination of services, CSC
and the CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for CSC to take
immediate measures to protect human health and safety, and/or the environment. CSC agrees to notify the CLIENT as soon
as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. The
CLIENT encourages CSC to take any and all measures that in ese's professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect
the health and safety of CSC's personnel and the public, and/or the environment, and the CLIENT agrees to compensate esc
for the additional cost of such work. In addition, the CLIENT waives any claim against CSC, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold CSC harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from CSC's encountering unanticipated
hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials, The CLIENT also agrees to compensate CSC for any time spent and
expenses incurred by esc in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon CSC's prevailing fee
schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION - All claims, disputes or controversies anslllg out of, or in relation to the interpretation,
application or enforcement of this Agreement shall be decided through non-binding mediation or other mutually agreed
alternative dispute resolution technique. The CLIENT and ese agree non-binding mediation or other mutually acceptable
alternative dispute resolution technique shall precede litigation or recourse to other jud icial forums,
RECOVERY OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION COSTS - In the event that legal action is brought by either pmty against the
other, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed by the other for the prevailing party's legal costs, in addition to whatever other
judgments or settlement SLims, ifany, may be due, Such legal costs shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney's
fees, cOLlrt costs, expert witness fees and other documented expenses, as well as the value of time spent by the prevailing
party and those in his or her employ in researching the issues in questions, discussing matters with attorneys and others,
preparing for depositions, responding to interrogatories, and so on. The value of time spent and the expenses incurred shall,
on CSC's part, be computed based upon esC's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to the
recovery of direct project costs,
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT and
CSC and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. The Agreement may be amended
on ly by written instrument signed by both CLIENT and esc.
wo
3of4
12/6/01
Glenn K, Bennett. P,L.S.
President
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
Timothy A. Burgess, P.E.
Vice President
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS
PREY AILING FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2000
Labor:
Project Manager
Chief of Surveys
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Design/Survey Technician I
Design/Survey Technician 2
2-Man Survey Crew
3-Man Survey Crew
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 65,00 per hour
- $ 60.00 per hour
- $ 55.00 per hour
- $ 50.00 per hour
- $ 95.00 per hour
- $150.00 per hour
Direct Expenses:
GPS - $
Vehicle 2-Wheel Drive - $
Vehicle 4-Wheel Drive - $
Outside Printing - $
Long Distance Telephone - $
Sub-Consultants - $
40.00 per hour
No Charge
No Charge
Cost
Cost
Cost
WO 4of4
12/6/0 I
Overland; lad (Meridian Road to Locus Jrove Road)
In Conjunction with ACHD Project 502005.0
Utility ltnprovements - City of Meridian
Services are based upon the following scope of services:
A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
1. Add approximately three new services at designated locations.
2. Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 7+30.
3. Extend 8"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 7+50.
4. Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 11 + 1 O.
5, Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 13+90.
6. Upgrade existing 6"0 water main to 10"0. Remove 6"0 pipe as necessary, Extend new
10"0 water main 980 LF east starting at Station 16+70. Connect to existing main at
Station 26+50,
7, Adjust one fire hydrant/valves.
8, Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 39+50.
9. Extend 10"0 water main 600 LF east from Station 40+50, Connect to existing main at
Station 46+50.
10. Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 47+00.
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1. Install new manhole at Station 19+00 and lay 730 LF of 8"0 sewer main to the existing
manhole at St~ltion'26+ 10. Install new manhole at Station 22+20,
2. Install approximately' four new services at designated locations.
This plan set will connect to the Locust Grove/Overland Road utility design project we are currently
proposing to design for the City,
We will send a letter to each property owner with vacant ground adjacent to the project. The letter will
advise them of the project, tell them the City will install a service stub to their property at their request,
and advise them the cost of the stub will be charged to them following completion of the work. A copy
Overlan( oad (Meridian to Locust Grove)
Sheet 2 of 2
of the letter wi II be sent to you for approval of the content and word ing prior to being issued. The City
shall provide us with a mailing list for all property owners within the project limits.
We will contact property owners with an existing structure and obtain the information necessary to
design the sewer main to service their existing structure,
We assume all improvements will be within public right-of-way, This scope of services does not
include preparing written easements. Should easements become necessary for construction, it shall be
the City's responsibility to obtain the easements. At the City's request, we can provide written
descriptions based on a time and material basis as a supplement to this scope of services.
Plans will be prepared following the City providing our office with electronic files of the final design
submittal to ACHD. We request the City obtain permission from ACHD to use the electronic files for
utility design purposes.
We will submit the plans to ACHD and DEQ for review and approval prior to construction. It will be
the City's responsibility to negotiate and execute the Joint Effort Agreement for construction with
ACHD.
Since the improvements requested are relatively minimal, we propose to provide plans on half-scale
(1 "=40') size II"x 17" format. We anticipate that the plan set wi II include a cover sheet, general note
sheet, 6 plan and profile sheets, and three city standard detail sheets. The total set is anticipated to
include 11 sheets,
We propose to provide the Design Services as outlined above on a time and materials basis with a not to
exceed amount of$ 10,745,00 without prior approval of the Owner. We have enclosed a copy of our
man-hour and fee estimates for your reference. Please note, construction staking is not included under
this scope of services.
The Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road) roadway project is cUlTently under design by
HDR Engineering for the ACHD. HDR will submit electronic files to ACHD as part of the project. The
cost estimate is contingent on the City obtaining and providing our office with copies of the electronic
files for use on the utility plans.
If the proposed scope of services and fee estimates are acceptable please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed Agreement for Professiona.1 Services.
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Meridian City
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Overland Road (Meridian to Locust Grove) Project
Task Description Project Proiect Technician I Technician II Total
Manager Engineer
Design
l. Coordination and Meetings 4 4 4 12
2. Cover Sheet (1) 4 4
3. Plan and Profile Sheets (6) 4 60 64
4. Genera I Note Sheet (l) 1 4 5
5, Standard Detail Sheets 4 4
6. Special Provisions & Estimates 2 16 4 22
7. ACHD Coordination 4 4
8. Property Owner Coordinantion 8 16 24
9. Review and Approval 4 8 16 28
Design Total Man,Hours 14 101 52 0 167
Meridian. Utlllty.xls
12/1/01
Civil Survey Consultants
Design Fee Estimate
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Overland Road (Meridian to Locust Grove) Project
Classification Hours Rate Total
Proiect Manager 14.00 @ $80.00 = $1,120.00
Proiect Engineer 10 1. 00 @ $65.00 = $6,565.00
Technician I 52.00 @ $55.00 = $2,860.00
Technician II 0.00 @ $50.00 = $0.00
Labor Subtotal 167,00 $10,545.00
Classification Hrs/Miles Rate Total
Misc. Printing $200.00
Direct Subtotal $200,00
Total Design Fees
$10,745.00
Meridian.Utility.xls
12/1/01
ltZ.-1t"
Ii)lr';J,,'"" Ol;>~
..:(< .li..~"~:S~ b
O-t"i') O..,J;t..
J.fJJ...~ .f C'lf:
1-D.r4l\r
To: Mayor Corrie
From: Brad Watson, P.E.
CC: File
Date: 2/19/2002
IRe: ACHD Roadway Projects
~ Z2.. 26Dz
~ ~ ylt\-t~
\
I am forwarding to you, for your signature, the five agreements for professional services with
Civil Survey Consultants for the water/sewer facilities to be constructed as part of the
forthcoming ACHD roadway projects. Those projects are:
1. Franklin Road, East 1$1 to Nola
2. Franklin Road, Nola to East of Gaudian
3. Locust Grove & Overland Road Intersection, incl. 1-84 to Overland
4. Overland Road, Meridian Rd. to Locust Grove
5. Overland Road, Locust Grove to Eagle Rd.
These agreements were approved by City Council on January 22,2002 subject to 1) Civil
Survey signing in the correct signature space and 2) the conflict between the definitions of
"Clienf' and "Owner" being resolved within the text of the agreement.
The revised and corrected agreements follow. Please forward to the City Clerk for attestation
when complete.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank you
~
From the desk of.. .
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Departmen1
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
4) Page 1
(208) 898.5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
watsonb@ci.meridianidus
IVIL SURVEY CONSUL T ANTS~ Ie "
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No.
THIS AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT" and CIVIL SURVEY
CONlliL T ANTS, INC" an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSC" is made and entered into this ~ day of
~ ~ , 2002. The CLIENT and CSC in consideration of their mutual covenants
herein agree as set forth\below.
The Client intends to construct new water and sewer system improvements in conjunction with the Ada County Highway
District's project to reconstruct Franklin Road (East I Sl to Nola), ACHD Project No. 5010 19.0, hereinafter referred to as the
PROJECT.
CLIENT INFORMATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT will provide to CSC a full and complete description of the PROJECT including; all design criteria, information
as to CLIENT's requirements for the PROJECT, design objectives and constraints, capacity and perfonnance requirements,
flexibility and expandability needs, any budgetary limitations, and copies of all design and construction standards which
CLIENT will require to be incorporated in the Drawings and Specifications.
The CLIENT will also provide to CSC all associated project information including data prepared by others; soil borings,
probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys; laboratory tests and inspection reports of samples, materials and
equipment; studies and interpretations of all environmental assessment and impact statements; surveys of record; property
descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; title reports; other special data or consultations as may be
available; all of which CSC may use and rely upon in perfonning services under this Agreement.
The CLIENT will obtain pennission for CSC to enter upon public and private property as required for CSC to perform
services under this Agreement.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CSC
CSC will provide services as outlined in the attached letter dated December 6, 200 I.
BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The Client will pay CSC for services provided under this Agreement per the attached letter dated December 6, 200 I.
Notice to Proceed, either verbal or written, shall constitute acceptance of this Agreement by the CLIENT, THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE CLIENT AGREES TO SAID TERMS AND
CONDITIONS, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
TITLE:
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL:
BY:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way, Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho ~
J ~~~
" ~~'~~t:r\r")" 4"
~"'.~ !:..l".~:,,:'~'j..... /" .......
...'Ii. ~t J['ii'" . .,t, \ "" ". ,:.,.
:;:,"!. ,,'" _......""~J.~S~I' t';~;Jimothy A. Burgess, Vice President
~ ,,?OftL, .... ;J' A
~ Ji~ ~~
.~ ~Q-~
R . ~
<'
;oj 1f.1 ,t.\ iL :;
..... '~~~2Ll :~
. ,'ff/ f";
.... .. (~~~' 1: ,~:-
...._ ,_ ' -...:-\ _ .t.r~ I~~- ~'-\'
...~ \,~" .,..0 .! "':.J .il.'
of""" -~~ i; :'l:f; ~:wr~~~ '\.. . ..l,.:_.~. ,--.~
.tI1-' -,,: ~' I~ :h:'" ~~
~I, .;~ ~..,.~~........... .;iIIj..,"'-!'" .'<1.");..
.' ~- ,A "lot.- ~ , -Nt'
.. .~,;; ~...".~ . '~",.> :-,'~
,. ~'-'.i~ ("~:'i:~.. "'It....
,~ <...-".......-'~ 'c ,..t~'\'
4t}:~~...1~:14._ ~(~#,~
wo
10f4
2/14/02
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL - CSC shall provide for CLIENT professional engineering and/or land surveying services for the Project
described in this Agreement. These services wil! be perfonned in accordance with generally accepted professional practices
for the intended use of the project. CSC makes no other warranty either expressed or implied.
CSC shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of any party involved in the Project other than their own. CSC shall not
be responsible for failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations
issued by CSC,
CSC has not been retained to supervise, direct or have control over Contractor's work. CSC specifically does not have
authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to
comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and perfonning their
work. Accordingly, CSC can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s) failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
The CLIENT understands and agrees that subsurface and soils characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals, CSC will coordinate this work in accordance with generally accepted practice of the professional
services being provided and makes no other warranties expressed or implied or as to the professional advice furnished by
professionals providing soils testing or geotechnical advice.
Resetting of survey and/or construction stakes shall constitute extra work and shall be paid for on a time and material basis in
addition to any other payment provided in this Agreement.
. OPINIONS OF COST - CSC may be asked to provide opinions of construction or PROJECT costs as part of the professional
services under this Agreement The CLIENT understands and agrees that CSC has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, The CLIENT understands that CSC opinions of cost are based on CSC experience
and represents CSC's judgment based on that experience, but CSC does not guarantee or warranty that either quotes, bids or
estimates prepared by contractors, subcontractors or other will not deviate from opinions prepared by CSC. The CLIENT
agrees to employ an independent cost estimator if the CLIENT desires additional assurance, warranty or guarantee of
PROJECT costs,
Should the CLIENT request that CSC modify any PROJECT aspect to reduce construction costs, then those services shall be
~onsidered additional and beyond the scope of this Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement.
REUSE OF DOCUMENTS - CSC shall retain an ownership interest of all professional products prepared by CSC. The
CLIENT agrees that no product will be reused without specific written permission of CSC, The CLIENT agrees to
indemnify and hold CSC harmless from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising from unauthorized reuse of all
work products prepared by CSC for the PROJECT.
GOVERNING LA W - Unless otherwise provided in an addendum, the law of the State of Idaho will govern the validity of
this Agreement, its interpretation and performance, and remedies for contract breach or any other claims related to this
Agreement
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS - CLIENT and CSC each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CLIENT and CSC are likewise bound to the other party to this Agreement, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than
CUENT and ese, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of CLIENT and CSC and not for the benefit of any other party.
TIMES OF PAYMENTS - CSC shall submit monthly statements for services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses
incurred. CUENT shall make prompt monthly payments, If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CSC for services and
wo
2of4
2/14/02
expenses within thirty (30) days ri receipt of esC's statement therefor, the amotl. due cse will be increased at the rate
of 1.5% per month from said tenth day, and in addition, CSC may, after giving ten days' written notice to CLIENT, suspend
services under this Agreement until CSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
TERMINA TlON - The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon
thirty days' written notice, Such termination shall be based upon substantial lack of performance by the other party under the
terms and conditions of this Agreement when said substantial lack of performance is through no fault of the terminating
party, Tfthis Agreement is terminated by either party, CSC shall be paid for services rendered and for reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of such termination.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND ASBESTOS - The CLIENT and cse agree that the work covered in this Agreement does not
anticipate either the presence or remediation of hazardous waste and/or asbestos. Hazardous materials may exist where there
is not reason to believe they should be present. CSC and the CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous
materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or termination of services. esc
and the CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for CSC to take
immediate measures to protect human health and safety, andlor the environment. CSC agrees.to notify the CLIENT as soon
as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. The
CLIENT encourages CSC to take any and all measures that in CSC's professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect
the health and safety of CSC's personnel and the public, and/or the environment, and the CLIENT agrees to compensate CSC
for the additional cost of such work, In addition, the CLIENT waives any claim against CSC, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold CSC harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from CSC's encountering unanticipated
hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. The CLIENT also agrees to compensate CSC for any time spent and
expenses incurred by CSC in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon CSC's prevailing fee
schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION - All claims, disputes or controversies ansmg out of, or in relation to the interpretation,
application or enforcement of this Agreement shall be decided through non-binding mediation or other mutually agreed
alternative dispute resolution technique, The CLIENT and CSC agree non-binding mediation or other mutually acceptable
alternative dispute resolution technique shall precede litigation or recourse to other judicial forums.
RECOVERY OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION COSTS - In the event that legal action is brought by either party against the
other, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed by the other for the prevailing party's legal costs, in addition to whatever other
judgments or settlement sums, if any, may be due. Such legal costs shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney's
fees, COUlt costs, expert witness fees and other documented expenses, as well as the value of time spent by the prevailing
party and those in his or her employ in researching the issues in questions, discussing matters with attorneys and others,
preparing for depositions, responding to interrogatories, and so on, The value of time spent and the expenses incurred shall,
on esC's part, be computed based upon esC's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to the
recovery of direct project costs.
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT and
cse and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. The Agreement may be amended
only by written instrument signed by both CLIENT and CSc.
wo
30f4
2/14/02
Glcnn K. Bcnnctt, P.L.S.
Prcsident
Timothy A. Burgess, P.E.
Vice President
Labor:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS
PREVAILING FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1,2000
Project Manager
Chief of Surveys
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Design/Survey Technician 1
Design/Survey Technician 2
2-Man Survey Crew
3-Man Survey Crew
Direct Expenses:
WO
GPS
Vehicle 2- Wheel Drive
Vehicle 4- Wheel Drive
Outside Printing
Long Distance Telephone
Sub-Consultants
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 65,00 per hour
- $ 60.00 per hour
- $ 55.00 per hour
- $ 50,00 per hour
- $ 95.00 per hour
- $150.00 per hour
- $ 40.00 per hour
- $ No Charge
- $ No Charge
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
40f4
2/14/02
Glenn K, Bennett, P,L.S,
President
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
toO South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)8884312
Fax 888-0323
Timotliy A. Burgess, P.E,
Vice President
December 6, 2001
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Franklin, Locust Grove, & Overland Roads - Water and Sewer Improvements
In Conjunction With ACHD Projects
Dear Brad:
Thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants to provide professional services for water and sewer
improvements for the referenced projects. These improvements will be incorporated into the ACHD
roadway design packages currently under design. We propose to provide services based upon the
sketches and \Vritten comments received from the City during our meeting on 11/28/01. The utility
plans shall match the limits of each separate ACHD project. Six different plan sets are proposed as
follows:
1. Franklin Road (East First to Nola)
2. Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian)
3. Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin)
4. Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection (including Locust Grove south ofI-84)
5. Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove)
6. Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle)
Following are detailed Scopes of Service for each project with a man-hour and cost estimate for your
reference. Again, thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants for these projects.
Sincerely,
C~M'tants, Inc.
Matt Hart, P .E.
Encl.
/.
'-. L'anklin Road (East First to NGLd)
In Conjunction with ACHD Project 501019.0
Utility Improvetnents - City of Meridian
Services are based upon the following scope of services:
A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
1. Relocate water main around both the Ninemile and Fivemile Lateral crossings as well as
all new storm drain conflicts.
2. Relocate approximately two fire hydrants and adjust approximately 13 valves and four
meters.
3. Add approximately four water services at designated locations.
4. Extend water main to Weast property and Baltic Place Subdivision as well as
undeveloped parcels at Station 140+40 and 144+ 10.
5. Extend 12"0 water main approximately 345 LF from Station 157+85 -171 +70.
6. Extend 12"0 water main north on Locust Grove from Franklin Road approximately 270
LF.
7. Extend 12"0 water main south on Locust Grove from Franklin Road approximately 400
LF to the end of the project limits.
8. Extend water main in Lanark Street from Locust Grove to Nola.
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1, Add new manhole at Station 129+20 and lay approximately 135 LF of new 8"0 east to an
existing manhole at Station 130+55 and lay approximately 40 LF of new 8"0 south from
new manhole.
2. Extend new 8"0 main approximately 27 LF to serve Baltic Place Subdivision.
3. Extend 12"0 sewer main east from existing manhole at Station 153+05 east 400 LF to a
new manhole at Station 157+05. Add new 12"0 sewer main from new manhole east 400
LF to new manhole at Station 161+05. Extend 8"0 sewer main 30 LF south of new
manhole at Station 161+05. Add service at Station 159+50.
4. Extend 8"0 sewer main south on Locust Grove approximately 395 LF to a new manhole
at the end of the project limits.
'1 ..nklin Road (East First to Nola)
Sheet 2 of2
As we discussed during the meeting, we are currently designing Locust Grove Road north of Franklin
Road approximately 700' and extending Lanark Street west approximately 650' from Nola
Street as part of the ACHD project. The utility plan set we propose to prepare for the City of Meridian
shall include any utility improvements the City requests for this area also. The City will need to provide
our office with written comments to include any utility improvements in this area,
We will send a letter to each property owner with vacant ground adjacent to the project. The letter will
advise them of the project, tell them the City will install a service stub to their property at their request,
and advise them the cost of the stub will be charged to them following completion of the work. A copy
of the letter will be sent to you for approval of the content and wording prior tobeing issued, The City
shall provide us with a mailing list for all property owners within the project limits.
We will contact property owners with an existing structure and obtain the information necessary to
design the sewer main to service their existing structure,
We assume all improvements will be within public right-of-way. This scope of services does not
include preparing written easements. Should easements become necessary for construction, it shall be
the City's responsibility to obtain the easements. At the City's request, we can provide written
descriptions based on a time and material basis as a supplement to this scope of services.
Plans will be prepared following the City providing our office with electronic files of the final design
submittal to ACHD. Although we are designing the project, our contract with ACHD gives them sole
ownership of the plans. We request the City obtain permission from ACHD to use the electronic files
for utility design purposes,
We will submit the plans to ACHD and DEQ for review and approval prior to construction. It will be
the City's responsibility to negotiate and execute the Joint Effort Agreement for construction with
ACHD,
Since the improvements requested are relatively minimal, we propose to provide plans on half-scale
(1 "=40') size 11 "xl?" format. We anticipate that the plan set will include a cover sheet, general note
sheet, 11 plan and profile sheets, and three city standard detail sheets. The total set is anticipated to
include 16 sheets.
We propose to provide the Design Services as outlined above on a time and materials basis with a not to
exceed amount of$ 14,925.00 without prior approval of the Client. We have enclosed a copy of our
man-hour and fee estimates for your reference. Please note, construction staking is not included under
this scope of services,
If the proposed scope of services and fee estimates are acceptable please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed Agreement for Professional Services.
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Merid ian City
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHD's Franklin (East 1st to Nola) Project
Task Description Proiect Project Technician I Technician" Total
Manager Engineer
.
Des i Q"n
1. Coordination and Meetings 4 4 4 12
2. Cover Sheet (1) 4 4
3. Plan and Profile Sheets (11) 6 110 116
4. General Note Sheet (1) 1 4 5
5. Standard Detail Sheets 4 4
6. Soecial Provisions & Estimates 2 16 4 22
7. ACHD Coordination 4 4
8, Prooerty Owner Coordinantion 8 24 32
9, Review and Approval 4 8 22 34
Design Total Man-Hours 16 151 66 0 233
Meridian-Utility.xls
Civil Survey Consultants
Design Fee Estimate
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHD's Franklin (East 1st to Nola) Project
Classification Hours Rate Total
Proiect ManaQer 16.00 @ $80.00 = $1,280,00
Project Engineer 151.00 @ $65.00 = $9,815.00
Technician I 66.00 @ $55.00 = $3,630.00
Technician II 0.00 @ $50,00 = $0.00
labor Subtotal 233.00 $14,725,00
Classification Hrs/Miles Rate Total
Misc. Printing $200.00
Direct Subtotal $200.00
Total Design Fees
$14,925.00
Meridian. Utility.xls
I -:IVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, 1
AGk€EMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No,
THIS AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT" and CIVIL SURVEY
CONSUL TANTS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSC" is made and entered into this ~day of
~()J\\l.~U , 2002, The CLIENT and CSC in consideration of their mutual covenants
herein agree as set forth below.
The Client intends to construct new water and sewer system improvements in conjunction with the Ada County Highway
District's project to reconstruct Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection, ACHD Project No. 52241.0, hereinafter referred
to as the PROJECT.
CLIENT INFORMATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT will provide to CSC a full and complete description of the PROJECT including; all design criteria, information
as to CLIENT's requirements for the PROJECT, design objectives and constraints, capacity and performance requirements,
flexibility and expandabiIity needs, any budgetary limitations, and copies of all design and construction standards which
CLIENT will require to be incorporated in the Drawings and Specifications.
The CLIENT will also provide to CSC all associated project information including data prepared by others; soil borings,
probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys; laboratory tests and inspection reports of samples, materials and
equipment; studies and interpretations of all environmental assessment and impact statements; surveys of record; property
descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; title reports; other special data or consultations as may be
available; all of which CSC may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement.
The CLIENT will obtain permission for CSC to enter upon public and private property as required for CSC to perform
services under this Agreement.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CSC
CSC will provide services as outlined in the attached letter dated December 6, 200 I,
BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The Client will pay CSC for services provided under this Agreement per the attached letter dated December 6, 200 I.
Notice to Proceed, either verbal or written, shall constitute acceptance of this Agreement by the CLIENT. THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS ARE PART OF THrS AGREEMENT. THE CLIENT AGREES TO SAID TERMS AND
CONDITIONS, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
BY:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc,
100 South Adkins Way, Suite 101
. .~~!;;i::::~.n, [d~ ~
. '\ ......r ",t~{'Jf;,'fj,";"", Timothy A. Burness Vice President
~-" '~;:.'''' ~ . ,'~ ~ ,
~~"G"", ...... ',i:~ ":~
v..... ''''lJ' '" ~ 'r
.Q::..,\ ~~
'v ~ -~~.
,," -, 'r"
o;~l I~, 1" '\ .~
.i:!JiLl J
."j
'.i.:f,. ,.:t /
\, ~'}'. ~"""''' 1....:.... ..J .-=-j. .~~.
:,,'--<: I 1"':\..,:.-./
~. "irf'.~7;~.:;~~~:~~-'~,.':~;'~::>, ," .~/
wo
10f4
2/14/02
I
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC,
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL - CSC shall provide for CLIENT professional engineering and/or land surveying services for the Project
described in this Agreement. These services will be perfonned in accordance with generally accepted professional practices
for the intended use of the project. CSC makes no other warranty either expressed or implied.
CSC shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of any party involved in the Project other than their own, CSC shall not
be responsible for failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations
issued by CSc.
CSC has not been retained to supervise, direct or have control over Contractor's work. CSC specifically does not have
authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to
comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their
work, Accordingly, CSC can neither guarantee the perfonnance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s) failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
The CLIENT understands and agrees that subsurface and soils characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals, CSC will coordinate this work in accordance with generally accepted practice of the professional
services being provided and makes no other warranties expressed or implied or as to the professional advice furnished by
professionals providing soils testing or geotechnical advice.
Resetting of survey andlor construction stakes shall constitute extra work and shall be paid for on a time and material basis in
addition to any other payment provided in this Agreement.
OPINIONS OF COST - CSC may be asked to provide opinions of construction or PROJECT costs as part of the professional
services under this Agreement. The CLIENT understands and agrees that CSC has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, The CLIENT understands that CSC opinions of cost are based on CSC experience
and represents CSC's judgment based on that experience, but CSC does not guarantee or warranty that either quotes, bids or
estimates prepared by contractors, subcontractors or other will not deviate from opinions prepared by CSc. The CLIENT
agrees to employ an independent cost estimator if the CLIENT desires additional assurance, warranty or guarantee of
PROJECT costs.
Should the CLIENT request that CSC modify any PROJECT aspect to reduce construction costs, then those services shall be
considered additional and beyond the scope of this Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement.
REUSE OF DOCUMENTS - CSC shall retain an ownership interest of all professional products prepared by CSC. The
CLIENT agrees that no product will be reused without specific written permission of CSC. The CLIENT agrees to
indemnify and hold CSC harmless from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising from unauthorized reuse of all
work products prepared by CSC for the PROJECT.
GOVERNING LAW - Unless otherwise provided in an addendum, the Jaw of the State of Idaho will govern the validity of
this Agreement, its interpretation and performance, and remedies for contract breach or any other claims related to this
Agreement.
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS - CLIENT and CSC each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CLIENT and CSC are likewise bound to the other party to this Agreement, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than
CLIENT and esc, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of CLIENT and CSC and not for the benefit of any other party,
TIMES OF PAYMENTS - CSC shall submit monthly statements for services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses
incurred, CLIENT shall make prompt monthly payments, If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CSC for services and
wo
2of4
2/14/02
expenses within thirty (30) days" receipt of CSe's statement therefor, the amor due CSC wiII be increased at the rate
of 1.5% per month from said tenth way, and in addition, CSC may, after giving ten oays' written notice to CLIENT, suspend
services under this Agreement until CSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges,
TERMINA T[ON - The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be temlinated by either party upon
thirty days' written notice. Such termination shall be based upon substantial lack of performance by the other party under the
tenns and conditions of this Agreement when said substantial lack of performance is through no fault of the tenninating
party. If this Agreement is tenninated by either party, CSC shall be paid for services rendered and for reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of such termination.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND ASBESTOS - The CLIENT and CSC agree that the work covered in this Agreement does not
anticipate either the presence or remediation of hazardous waste and/or asbestos. Hazardous materials may exist where there
is not reason to believe they should be present. CSC and the CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous
materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or tennination of services. CSC
and the CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for CSC to take
immediate measures to protect human health and safety, and/or the environment. esc agrees to notify the CLIENT as soon
as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. The
CLIENT encourages cse to take any and all measures that in esC's professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect
the health and safety of esC's personnel and the public, and/or the environment, and the CLIENT agrees to compensate CSC
for the additional cost of such work, In addition, the CLIENT waives any claim against cse, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold CSC harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from CSC's encountering unanticipated
hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials, The CLIENT also agrees to compensate esc for any time spent and
expenses incurred by esc in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon CSC's prevailing fee
schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
orSPUTE RESOLUTION - All claims, disputes or controversies arising out of, or in relation to the interpretation,
application or enforcement of this Agreement shall be decided through non-binding mediation or other mutually agreed
alternative dispute resolution technique. The CLIENT and CSC agree non-binding mediation or other mutually acceptable
alternative dispute resolution technique shall precede litigation or recourse to other judicial forums.
RECOVER Y OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION COSTS - [n the event that legal action is brought by either party against the
other, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed by the other for the prevailing party's legal costs, in addition to whatever other
judgments or settlement sums, if any, may be due, Such legal costs shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney's
fees, court costs, expert witness fees and other documented expenses, as well as the value of time spent by the prevailing
party and those in his or her employ in researching the issues in questions, discussing matters with attorneys and others,
preparing for depositions, responding to interrogatories, and so on. The value of time spent and the expenses incurred shall,
on CSe's part, be computed based upon CSC's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to the
recovery of direct project costs.
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT and
cse and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. The Agreement may be amended
only by written instrument signed by both CLIENT and eSc.
wo
30f4
2/14/02
Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.S.
President
Timothy A, Burgess, P.E.
Vice Pres ident
Labor:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fa." 888.0323
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS
PREY AILING FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2000
Project Manager
Chief of Surveys
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Design/Survey Technician 1
Design/Survey Teclmician 2
2-Man Survey Crew
3-Man Survey Crew
Direct Expenses:
WO
GPS
Vehicle 2- Wheel Drive
Vehicle 4- Wheel Drive
Outside Printing
Long Distance Telephone
Sub-Consultants
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 65.00 per hour
- $ 60.00 per hour
- $ 55.00 per hour
- $ 50.00 per hour
- $ 95,00 per hour
- $150,00 per hour
- $ 40.00 per hour
- $ No Charge
- $ No Charge
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
4of4
2/14/02
Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.S.
President
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)88843 ] 2
Fax 888-0323
Timothy A, Burgess, P,E.
Vice President
December 6, 2001
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Franklin, Locust Grove, & Overland Roads - Water and Sewer Improvements
In Conjunction With ACHD Projects
Dear Brad:
Thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants to provide professional services for water and sewer
improvements for the referenced projects. These improvements will be incorporated into the ACHD
roadway design packages currently under design. We propose to provide services based upon the
sketches and written comments received from the City during our meeting on 11/28/01. The utility
plans shall match the limits of each separate ACHD project. Six different plan sets are proposed as
follows:
1, Franklin Road (East First to Nola)
2. Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian)
3. Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin)
4. Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection (including Locust Grove south of 1-84)
5. Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove)
6. Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle)
Following are detailed Scopes of Service for each project with a man-hour and cost estimate for your
reference. Again, thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants for these projects.
Sincerely,
CAMtlltan(s,lnc
Matt Hart, P .E.
Enc!.
LoL .;t Grove/Overland Road Intel_ -,ction
In Conjunction with ACHD Project 52241.0
Utility Improvements - City of Meridian
Services are based upon the following scope of services:
A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
I. On Locust Grove Road north of Overland:
a, Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF west from Station 45+80.
b. Extend 12"0 water main 295 LF south from Station 45+80,
c. Extend 12"0 water main 30 LF east from Station 48+80.
d. Extend 12"0 water main 270 LF south from Station 48+80.
2. On Overland Road:
a. Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 50+ 10.
b, Extend 8"0 water main 50 LF south from Station 52+80.
3. On Locust Grove Road south of Overland:
a. Extend 8"0 water main 60 LF east from Station 61 +50.
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1, On Locust Grove north of Overland:
a. Install new manhole at Station 46+ 10 and extend 8"0 sewer main 20 LF west and 310
LF south,
b. Install new manhole at Station 49+20 and extend 8"0 sewer main 50 LF east and 255
LF south.
2. On Overland Road:
a. Extend 8"0 sewer main 30 LF south from Station 53+ 10.
b, Install new manhole at Station 59+70 with service south.
c. Extend 8"0 sewer main 30 LF east to Station 60+00.
3, On Locust Grove Road south of Overland:
a, Extend 8"0 sewer main 300 LF north from Station 59+ 10.
b. Extend 6"0 sewer service 70 LF east from Station 60+30.
c. Install new manhole at Station 61 +95 with 6"0 stub northeast.
Locust
Ne/OverIand Road Intersection
Sheet 2 of 2
This plan set will connect to the two Overland Road utility design projects we are currently proposing to
design for the City. Our office is designing the Overland/Locust Grove Road intersection for ACHD.
The improvements listed above will match the limits of that design project. The Overland Road utility
improvements will match into the Overland Road design projects currently being designed by HDR
Engineering for ACHD, We are proposing utility design improvements to match the Overland Road
projects under separate scopes of services.
We will send a letter to each property owner with vacant ground adjacent to the project. The letter will
advise them of the proj ect, tell them the City will install a service stub to their property at their request,
and advise them the cost of the stub will be charged to them following completion of the work. A copy
of the letter will be sent to you for approval of the content and wording prior to being issued. The City
shall provide us with a mailing list for all property owners within the project limits.
We will contact property owners with an existing structure and obtain the information necessary to
design the sewer main to service their existing structure.
We assume all improvements will be within public right"of-way. This scope of services does not
include preparing written easements. Should easements become necessary for construction, it shall be
the City's responsibility to obtain the easements. At the City's request, we can provide written
descriptions based on a time and material basis as a supplement to this scope of services.
Plans will be prepared following the City providing our office with electronic files ofthe final design
submittal to ACHD, Although we are designing the project, our contract with ACHD gives them sole
ownership of the plans. We request the City obtain permission from ACHD to use the electronic files
for utility design purposes,
We will submit the plans to ACHD and DEQ for review and approval prior to construction. It will be
the City's responsibility to negotiate and execute the Joint Effort Agreement for construction with
ACHD.
Since the improvements requested are relatively minimal, we propose to provide plans on half-scale
(1 "=40') size 11 "xl7" format. We anticipate that the plan set will include a cover sheet, general note
sheet, 5 plan and profile sheets, and three city standard detail sheets. The total set is anticipated to
include 10 sheets. .
We propose to provide the Design Services as outlined above on a time and materials basis with a not to
exceed amount of $ 9,795.00 without prior approval ofthe Client. We have enclosed a copy of our man-
hour and fee estimates for your reference. Please note, construction staking is 110t included under this
scope of services.
Ifthe proposed scope of services and fee estimates are acceptable please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed Agreement for Professional Services.
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Meridian City
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Locust Grove/Overland Intersection Project
Task Description Project Project Technician J Technician II Total
Manager Engineer
,
Design
L Coordination and Meetings 4 4 4 12
2. Cover Sheet (1) 4 4
3. Plan and Profile Sheets (5) 3 50 53
4. General Note Sheet (1) 1 4 5
5. Standard Detail Sheets 4 4
6, Special Provisions & Estimates 2 16 4 22
7, ACHD Coordination 4 4
8. Property Owner Coordinantion 8 16 24
9. Review and Approval 4 8 12 24
Design Total Man.Hours 13 91 48 0 152
M eri d i an. Utllity,xls
Civil Survey Consultants
Design Fee Estimate
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHD's Locust Grove/Overland Intersection Project
Classification Hours Rate Total
Project Manager 13.00 @ $80.00 = $1,040.00
Prefect Engineer 91. 00 @ $65.00 = $5,915.00
Technician I 48.00 @ $55.00 ;;;;: $2,640,00
Technician II 0.00 @ $50.00 ;;;;: $0.00
labor Subtotal 152.00 $9,595.00
Classification Hrs/Miles Rate Total
Misc. Printing $200.00
Direct Subtotal $200.00
Total Design Fees
$9,795.00
Me ri d i a n - U tj I i ty .xl s
IVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, If
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No.
THIS AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT" and CIVIL SURVEY
CONSUL TANTS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSC" is made and entered into this Mday of
~M\~U , 2002, The CLIENT and CSC in consideration of their mutual covenants
herein agree as set forth ~elow,
The Client intends to construct new water and sewer system improvements in conjunction with the Ada County Highway
District's project to reconstruct Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian), ACHD Project No. 502004,0, hereinafter referred
to as the PROJECT.
CLIENT INFORMATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT will provide to CSC a full and complete description of the PROJECT including; all design criteria, information
as to CLIENT's requirements for the PROJECT, design objectives and constraints, capacity and performance requirements,
flexibility and expandability needs, any budgetary limitations, and copies of all design and construction standards which
CLIENT will require to be incorporated in the Drawings and Specifications.
The CLIENT will also provide to CSC all associated project information including data prepared by others; soil borings,
probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys; laboratory tests and inspection reports of samples, materials and
equipment; studies and interpretations of all environmental assessment and impact statements; surveys of record; property
descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; title reports; other special data or consultations as may be
available; all of which CSC may use and rely upon in perfonning services under this Agreement.
The CLIENT will obtain permission for CSC to enter upon public and private property as required for CSC to perfonn
services under this Agreement.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CSC
CSC will provide services as outlined in the attached letter dated December 6, 2001.
BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The Client will pay CSC for services provided under this Agreement per the attached letter dated December 6, 2001.
Notice to Proceed, either verbal or written, shall constitute acceptance of this Agreement by the CLIENT. THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE CLIENT AGREES TO SAID TERMS AND
CONDITIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the pUl1ies hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way, Suite 101
BY :",,, ::4,;~:'d~'n, [:~ ~
.,,,': yr ~\r1~:1'~iif,"1."{\ Timothy A. Burgess, Vice President
-:::::..:,;-'., ~.t{~... (~
1"'V"" \h"~ }o~. r 'if'~
~. ~ ~a ....
\f
s.
~
.\~ - ~YiL ~
~ . ......:t _ I ~~
(\. \- l\ \ \ J ';' f;( if;
TITLE: \. \. ~\) '--J.:e {x... ~;:~~." . ..~IJ/. ,01 f
APPROVED BY CITY cciUNCIL: \ \~{?~':"3:r fr.1 ~~t~4k
" I...-'!~:... -:~"'.; .i.~~~i,J'!'''i'\~ ~;,/lj.iy
...r:!~_!j.~.~~. .,-::~.:~:~"~~~")!r!1r~ ~
WO ><"e"r~'f'4
2/14/02
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL - CSC shall provide for CLIENT professional engineering and/or land surveying services for the Project
described in this Agreement. These services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices
for the intended use of the project. CSC makes no other warranty either expressed or implied.
CSC shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of any party involved in the Project other than their own. CSC shall not
be responsible for failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations
issued by CSC.
CSC has not been retained to supervise, direct or have control over Contractor's work. CSC specifically does not have
authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to
comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and perfonning their
work. Accordingly, CSC can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s) failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents,
The CLIENT understands and agrees that subsurface and soils characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals. CSC will coordinate this work in accordance with generally accepted practice of the professional
services being provided and makes no other warranties expressed or implied or as to the professional advice Furnished by
professionals providing soils testing or geotechnical advice.
Resetting of survey and/or construction stakes shall constitute extra work and shall be paid for on a time and material basis in
addition to any other payment provided in this Agreement.
OPINIONS OF COST. CSC may be asked to provide opinions of construction or PROJECT costs as part of the professional
services under this Agreement. The CLIENT understands and agrees that cse has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions. The CLIENT understands that CSC opinions of cost are based on CSC experience
and represents CSC's judgment based on that experience, but CSC does not guarantee or warranty that either quotes, bids or
estimates prepared by contractors, subcontractors or other will not deviate from opinions prepared by CSc. The CLlENT
agrees to employ an independent cost estimator if the CLlENT desires additional assurance, warranty or guarantee of
PROJECT costs.
Should the CLIENT request that CSC modify any PROJECT aspect to reduce construction costs, then those services shall be
considered additional and beyond the scope of this Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement.
REUSE OF DOCUMENTS - CSC shall retain an ownership interest of all professional products prepared by CSC. The
CLlENT agrees that no product will be reused without specific written permission of Csc. The CLIENT agrees to
indemnify and hold CSC harmless from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising from unauthorized reuse of all
work products prepared by cse for the PROJECT.
GOVERNING LAW - Unless otherwise provided in an addendum, the law of the State of Idaho will govern the validity of
this Agreement, its interpretation and performance, and remedies for contract breach or any other claims related to this
Agreement.
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS . CLIENT and CSC each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CLIENT and CSC are likewise bound to the other party to this Agreement, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than
CLIENT and esc, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of CLIENT and CSC and not for the bene tit of any other party.
TIMES OF PAYMENTS - CSC shall submit monthly statements for services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses
incurred. CLIENT shall make prompt monthly payments, If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CSC for services and
wo
20f4
2/14/02
expenses within thirty (30) days a( eceipt of CSe's statement therefor, the amour ue CSC will be increased at the rate
of 1,5% per month from said tenth aay, and in addition, CSC may, after giving ten days' written notice to CLIENT, suspend
services under this Agreement until CSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
TERMINA TION ~ The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon
thirty days' written notice. Such tennination shall be based upon substantial lack of perfonnance by the other party under the
terms and conditions of this Agreement when said substantial lack of performance is through no fault of the terminating
party. If this Agreement is terminated by either party, CSC shall be paid for services rendered and for reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of such tennination.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND ASBESTOS - The CLIENT and CSC agree that the work covered in this Agreement does not
anticipate either the presence or remediation of hazardous waste and/or asbestos. Hazardous materials may exist where there
is not reason to believe they should be present. CSC and the CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous
materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or termination of services. CSC
and the CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for CSC to take
immediate measures to protect human health and safety, and/or the environment. CSC agrees to notify the CLIENT as soon
as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. The
CLIENT encourages CSC to take any and all measures that in CSe's professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect
the health and safety of CSe's personnel and the public, and/or the environment, and the CLIENT agrees to compensate CSC
for the additional cost of such work. In addition, the CLIENT waives any claim against CSC, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold cse harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from ese's encountering unanticipated
hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. The CLIENT also agrees to compensate CSC for any time spent and
expenses incurred by cse in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon CSC's prevailing fee
schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION - All claims, disputes or controversies anslllg out of, or in relation to the interpretation,
application or enforcement of this Agreement shall be decided through non~binding mediation or other mutually agreed
alternative dispute resolution technique. The CLIENT and CSC agree non-binding mediation or other mutually acceptable
alternative dispute resolution technique shall precede litigation or recourse to other judicial forums.
RECOVERY OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION COSTS - In the event that legal action is brought by either party against the
other, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed by the other for the prevailing party's legal costs, in addition to whatever other
judgments or settlement sums, if any, may be due, Such legal costs shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney's
fees, court costs, expert witness fees and other documented expenses, as well as the value of time spent by the prevailing
party and those in his or her employ in researching the issues in questions, discussing matters with attorneys and others,
preparing for depositions, responding to interrogatories, and so on. The value of time spent and the expenses incurred shall,
on CSC's part, be computed based upon CSC's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to the
recovery of direct project costs.
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT and
CSC and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. The Agreement may be amended
only by written instrument signed by both CLIENT and cse.
wo
30f4
2/14/02
Glenn K. Bennett, P.LS.
President
Timothy A. Burgess, P.E.
Vi ce President
Labor:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 10 1
Meridian, Idaho 83642
{208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS
PREVAILING FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2000
Project Manager
Chief of Surveys
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Design/Survey Technician 1
Design/Survey Technician 2
2-Man Survey Crew
3-Man Survey Crew
Direct Expenses:
WO
GPS
Vehicle 2- Wheel Drive
Vehicle 4- Wheel Drive
Outside Printing
Long Distance Telephone
Sub-Consultants
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 65.00 per hour
- $ 60.00 per hour
- $ 55.00 per hour
- $ 50.00 per hour
- $ 95.00 per hour
- $150.00 per hour
- $ 40.00 per hour
- $ No Charge
- $ No Charge
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
40f4
2/14/02
Glenn K, Bennett, P.L.S.
President
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
Timothy A, Burgess, P.E.
Vice President
December 6,2001
Brad Watson, P .E.
City Engineer
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Franklin, Locust Grove, & Overland Roads - Water and Sewer Improvements
In Conjunction With ACHD Projects
Dear Brad:
Thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants to provide professional services for water and sewer
improvements for the referenced projects. These improvements will be incorporated into the ACHD
roadway design packages currently under design, We propose to provide services based upon the
sketches and written comments received from the City during our meeting on 11/28/01. The utility
plans shall match the limits of each separate ACHD project. Six different plan sets are proposed as
follows:
1. Franklin Road (East First to Nola)
2. Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian)
3. Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin)
4. Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection (including Locust Grove south ofI-84)
5. Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove)
6. Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle)
Following are detailed Scopes of Service for each project with a man-hour and cost estimate for your
reference. Again, thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants for these projects.
Sincerely,
CAMltants, Inc.
Matt Hart, P.E.
Encl.
FreL Jin Road (Nola to East of Oc{L....Lian)
In Conjunction with ACHD Project 502004.0
Utility Improvements - City of Meridian
Services are based upon the following scope of services:
A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
1. Relocate water main around all new storm drain conflicts.
2. Relocate valves and meters as required.
3. Add approximately 11 water services at designated locations.
4. Extend 12"0 water main 1050 LF east and 60 LF (8"0) south of Station 161+25.
5. Extend 12"0 water main 995 LF east and 100 LF (10"0) south of Station 171+75.
6. Extend 12"0 water main 1120 LF east and 100 LF (10"0) south of Station 181 +70,
7. Exteng 12"0 water main 250 LF east and 70 LF (8"0) south of Station 192+90.
8. Extend 12"0 water main 140 LF east and 70 LF (8"0) south of Station 195+40.
B. SANIT AR Y SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1. Extend 12"0 sewer main 2,045 LF east of Station 161 +05.
2, Extend 8"0 sewer main 1,300 LF east of Station 181 +50,
3. Extend 8"0 sewer main 70 LF south of a new manhole at Station 171 +55.
4. Extend 10"0 sewer main 70 LF south of a new manhole at Station 181 +50.
5. Extend 8"0 sewer main 30 LF south of a new manhole at Station 192+65.
6. Extend 8"0 sewer main 50 LF southeast of a new manhole at Station 194+50.
7. Add approximately 18 new sewer services at designated locations,
The notes and sketches you provided us with during the meeting were incomplete for the limits of this
project. You indicated there would be additional utility improvements near the Eagle/Franklin Road
intersection and east of Eagle Road on Franklin Road, The utility plan set we propose to prepare for the
City of Meridian shall include any utility improvements the City requests for this area also, up to the
limits of the ACHD project. The City will need to provide our office with written comments to include
any utility improvements in this area. We are not designing improvements anywhere on Eagle Road,
FranklK .oad (Nola to East of Gaudian)
Sheet 2 of2
including the Franklin/Eagle Road intersection, as part of the ACHD project. We do not propose to
design utility improvements within the Eagle Road right-of-way as part of this scope of services.
We will send a letter to each property owner with vacant ground adjacent to the project. The letter will
advise them of the project, tell them the City will install a service stub to their property at their request,
and advise them the cost of the stub will be charged to them following completion of the work. A copy
of the letter will be sent to you for approval of the content and wording prior to being issued. The City
shall provide us with a mailing list for all property owners within the project limits.
We will contact property owners with an existing structure and obtain the information necessary to
design the sewer main to service their existing structure,
We assume all improvements will be within public right-of-way. This scope of services does not
include preparing written easements. Should easements become necessary for construction, it shall be
the City's responsibility to obtain the easements. At the City's request, we can provide written
descriptions based on a time and material basis as a supplement to this scope of services.
Plans will be prepared following the City providing our office with electronic files of the final design
submittal to ACHD. Although we are designing the project, our contract with ACHD gives them sole
ownership ofthe plans. We request the City obtain permission from ACHD to use the electronic files
for utility design purposes.
We will submit the plans to ACHD and DEQ for review and approval prior to construction. It will be
the City's responsibility to negotiate and execute the Joint Effort Agreement for construction with
ACHD.
Since the improvements requested are relatively minimal, we propose to provide plans on half-scale
(I "=40') size 11 "xI 7" format. We anticipate that the plan set will include a cover sheet, general note
sheet, 11 plan and profile sheets, and three city standard detail sheets. The total set is anticipated to
include 16 sheets,
We propose to provide the Design Services as outlined above on a time and materials basis with a not to
exceed amount of $ 14,925.00 without prior approval of the Client. We have enclosed a copy of our
man-hour and fee estimates for your reference. Please note, construction staking is not included under
this scope of services.
If the proposed scope of services and fee estimates are acceptable please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed Agreement for Professional Services.
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Meridian City
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Franklin (Nola to East of Gaudian) Project
Task Description Project Project Technician I Technician II Total
Manager Engineer
Design
1. Coordination and Meetings 4 4 4 12
2. Cover Sheet (1) 4 4
3. Plan and Profile Sheets (11) 6 110 116
4. General Note Sheet (1) 1 4 5
5. Standard Detail Sheets 4 4
6. Special Provisions & Estimates 2 16 4 22
7. ACHD Coordination 4 4
8. Property Owner Coordinantion 8 24 32
9. Review and Approval 4 8 22 34
Design Total Man-Hours 16 151 66 0 233
Meridian-Utility.xls
Civil Survey Consultants
Oesign Fee Estimate
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Franklin (Nola to East of Gaudian) Project
Classificati on Hours Rate Total
Project Manager 16.00 @ $80.00 = $1,280.00
Project Engineer 151.00 @ $65.00 = $9,815.00
Technician I 66.00 @ $55.00 = $3,630.00
Technician II 0.00 @ $50.00 = $0.00
Labor Subtotal 233.00 $14,725.00
Classification Hrs/Miles Rate Total
Misc. Printing $200.00
Direct Subtotal $200.00
Total Design Fees
$14,925.00
Meridian.Utility.xls
'IVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, 11..
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No.
THIS AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT" and CIVIL SURVEY
CONSULTANTS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSC" is made and entered into this a.a day of
::S:M\\.ili:\\..\ ,2002. The CLIENT and CSC in consideration of their mutual covenants
herein agree as set forth below.
The Client intends to construct new water and sewer system improvements in conjunction with the Ada County Highway
District's project to reconstruct Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road), ACHD Project No. 502005.0,
hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT.
CLIENT INFORMATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT wiII provide to CSC a full and complete description of the PROJECT including; all design criteria, information
as to CLIENT's requirements for the PROJECT, design objectives and constraints, capacity and performance requirements,
flexibility and expandability needs, any budgetary limitations, and copies of all design and construction standards which
CLIENT will require to be incorporated in the Drawings and Specifications.
The CLIENT will also provide to CSC all associated project information including data prepared by others; soil borings,
probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys; laboratory tests and inspection reports of samples, materials and
equipment; studies and interpretations of all environmental assessment and impact statements; surveys of record; property
descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; title reports; other special data or consultations as may be
available; all of which CSC may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement.
The CLIENT will obtain permission for CSC to enter upon public and private property as required for CSC to perform
services under this Agreement.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CSC
CSC will provide services as outlined in the attached letter dated December 6, 2001.
BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The Client will pay CSC for services provided under this Agreement per the attached letter dated December 6,2001.
Notice to Proceed, either verbal or written, shall constitute acceptance of this Agreement by the CLIENT. THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE CLrENT AGREES TO SAID TERMS AND
CONDITIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
TITLE:
wo
10f4
2/14/02
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL - cse shall provide for CLIENT professional engineering and/or land surveying services for the Project
described in this Agreement. These services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices
for the intended use of the project. CSC makes no other warranty either expressed or implied.
CSC shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of any party involved in the Project other than their own. CSC shall not
be responsible for failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations
issued by CSc.
CSC has not been retained to supervise, direct or have control over Contractor's work. CSC specifically does not have
authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to
comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their
work. Accordingly, CSC can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s) failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
The CLIENT understands and agrees that subsurface and soils characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals. CSC will coordinate this work in accordance with generally accepted practice of the professional
services being provided and makes no other warranties expressed or implied or as to the professional advice furnished by
professionals providing soils testing or geotechnical advice.
Resetting of survey and/or construction stakes shall constitute extra work and shall be paid for on a time and material basis in
addition to any other payment provided in this Agreement.
OPINIONS OF COST - CSC may be asked to provide opinions of construction or PROJECT costs as part of the professional
services under this Agreement. The CLIENT understands and agrees that CSC has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions. The CLiENT understands that CSC opinions of cost are based on CSC experience
and represents esC's judgment based on that experience, but CSC does not guarantee or warranty that either quotes, bids or
estimates prepared by contractors, subcontractors or other will not deviate from opinions prepared by CSC. The CLIENT
agrees to employ an independent cost estimator if the CLIENT desires additional assurance, warranty or guarantee of
PROJECT costs.
Should the CLIENT request that CSC modify any PROJECT aspect to reduce construction costs, then those services shall be
considered additional and beyond the scope of this Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement.
REUSE OF DOCUMENTS - CSC shall retain an ownership interest of all professional products prepared by CSC. The
CLIENT agrees that no product will be reused without specific written permission of CSC. The CLIENT agrees to
indemnify and hold CSC harmless from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising from unauthorized reuse of all
work products prepared by CSC for the PROJECT.
GOVERNING LA W - Unless otherwise provided in an addendum, the law of the State of Idaho will govern the validity of
this Agreement, its interpretation and performance, and remedies for contract breach or any other claims related to this
Agreement.
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS - CLrENT and CSC each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CLiENT and CSC are likewise bound to the other party to this Agreement, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than
CLIENT and CSC, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of CLIENT and CSC and not for the benefit of any other party.
TIMES OF PAYMENTS - CSC shall submit monthly statements for services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses
incurred. CLIENT shall make prompt monthly payments. If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CSC for services and
wo
20f4
2/14/02
expenses within thirty (30) days af eceipt of CSC's statement therefor, the amour ;ue CSC will be increased at the rate
of [.5% per month from said tenth day, and in addition, CSC may, after giving ten days' written notice to CLIENT, suspend
services under this Agreement lIntil CSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
TERMINA TION - The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon
thirty days' written notice. Such termination shall be based upon substantial lack of performance by the other party under the
terms and conditions of this Agreement when said substantial lack of performance is through no fault of the tenninating
party. If this Agreement is terminated by either party, CSC shall be paid for services rendered and for reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of such termination.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND ASBESTOS - The CLIENT and CSC agree that the work covered in this Agreement does not
anticipate either the presence or remediation of hazardous waste and/or asbestos. Hazardous materials may exist where there
is not reason to believe they should be present. CSC and the CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous
materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or termination of services. CSC
and the CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for CSC to take
immediate measures to protect human health and safety, and/or the environment. CSC agrees to notify the CLIENT as soon
as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. The
CLIENT encourages CSC to take any and all measures that in CSC's professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect
the health and safety of CSC's personnel and the public, and/or the environment, and the CLIENT agrees to compensate CSC
for the additional cost of such work. In addition, the CLIENT waives any claim against esc, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold CSC harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from CSC's encountering unanticipated
hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. The CLIENT also agrees to compensate CSC for any time spent and
expenses incurred by CSC in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon CSC's prevailing fee
schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION - All claims, disputes or controversies arising out of, or in relation to the interpretation,
application or enforcement of this Agreement shall be decided through non-binding mediation or other mutually agreed
alternative dispute resolution technique. The CLIENT and CSC agree non-binding mediation or other mutually acceptable
alternative dispute resolution technique shall precede litigation or recourse to other judicial forums.
RECOVERY OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION COSTS - In the event that legal action is brought by either party against the
other, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed by the other for the prevailing palty's legal costs, in addition to whatever other
judgments or settlement sums, if any, may be due. Such legal costs shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney's
fees, court costs, expert witness fees and other documented expenses, as well as the value of time spent by the prevailing
party and those in his or her employ in researching the issues in questions, discussing matters with attorneys and others,
preparing for depositions, responding to interrogatories, and so on. The value of time spent and the expenses incurred shall,
on CSC's part, be computed based upon CSC's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to the
recovery of direct project costs.
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT and
CSC and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. The Agreement may be amended
only by written instrument signed by both CLIENT and CSc.
wo
30f4
2/14/02
Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.S.
President
Timothy A. Burgess, P.E.
Vice Pres ident
Labor:
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS
PREV AILING FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1,2000
Project Manager
Chief of Surveys
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Design/Survey Teclmician 1
Design/Survey Technician 2
2-Man Survey Crew
3-Man Survey Crew
Direct Expenses:
WO
GPS
Vehicle 2- Wheel Drive
Vehicle 4- Wheel Drive
Outside Printing
Long Distance Telephone
Sub-Consul tants
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 80.00 per hour
- $ 65.00 per hour
- $ 60.00 per hour
- $ 55.00 per hour
- $ 50.00 per hour
- $ 95.00 per hour
- $150,00 per hour
- $ 40.00 per hour
- $ No Charge
- $ No Charge
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
- $ Cost
40f4
2/14/02
Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.S.
President
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc.
100 South Adkins Way
Suite 101
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208)888-4312
Fax 888-0323
Timothy A. Burgess, P.E.
Vice President
December 6, 2001
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Franklin, Locust Grove, & Overland Roads - Water and Sewer Improvements
In Conjunction With ACHD Projects
Dear Brad:
Thank you for considering Civil Survey Consultants to provide professional services for water and sewer
improvements for the referenced projects. These improvements will be incorporated into the ACHD
roadway design packages currently under design. We propose to provide services based upon the
sketches and written comments received from the City during our meeting on 11/28/01. The utility
plans shall match the limits of each separate ACHD project. Six different plan sets are proposed as
follows:
1. Franklin Road (East First to Nola)
2. Franklin Road (Nola to East of Gaudian)
3. Locust Grove Road (1-84 to Franklin)
4. Locust Grove/Overland Road Intersection (including Locust Grove south ofI-84)
5. Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove)
6. Overland Road (Locust Grove to Eagle)
Following are detailed Scopes of Service for each project with a man-hour and cost estimate for your
reference. Again, thank you for c'onsidering Civil Survey Consultants for these projects.
Sincerely,
CAMltants, Inc.
Matt Hart, P.E.
Encl.
Overlan( .)ad (Meridian to Locust Grove)
Sheet 2 of 2
of the letter will be sent to you for approval ofthe content and wording prior to being issued. The City
shall provide us with a mailing list for all property owners within the project limits.
We will contact property owners with an existing structure and obtain the information necessary to
design the sewer main to service their existing structure.
We assume all improvements will be within public right-oE-way. This scope of services does not
include preparing written easements. Should easements become necessary for construction, it shall be
the City's responsibility to obtain the easements. At the City's request, we can provide written
descriptions based on a time and material basis as a supplement to this scope of services.
Plans will be prepared following the City providing our office with electronic files of the final design
submittal to ACHD. We request the City obtain permission from ACHD to use the electronic files for
utility design purposes.
We will submit the plans to ACHD and DEQ for review and approval prior to construction. It will be
the City's responsibility to negotiate and execute the Joint Effort Agreement for construction with
ACHD.
Since the improvements requested are relatively minimal, we propose to provide plans on half-scale
(1 "=40') size 11 "x17" format. We anticipate that the plan set will include a cover sheet, general note
sheet, 6 plan and profile sheets, and three city standard detail sheets. The total set is anticipated to
include 11 sheets.
We propose to provide the Design Services as outlined above on a time and materials basis with a not to
exceed amount of $ 10,745.00 without prior approval of the Client. We have enclosed a copy of our
man-hour and fee estimates for your reference. Please note, construction staking is not included under
this scope of services.
The Overland Road (Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road) roadway project is currently under design by
HDR Engineering for the ACHD. HDR will submit electronic tiles to ACHD as part of the project. The
cost estimate is contingent on the City obtaining and providing our office with copies of the electronic
files for use on the utility plans.
If the proposed scope of services and fee estimates are acceptable please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed Agreement for Professional Services.
Civil Survey Consultants
Design Fee Estimate
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Overland Road (Meridian to Locust Grove) Project
Classification Hours Rate Total
Proiect Manager 14.00 @ $80.00 = $1,120.00
Proiect Engineer 101.00 @ $65.00 = $6,565.00
Technician I 52.00 @ $55.00 = $2,860.00
Technician II 0.00 @ $50.00 = $0.00
,
Labor Subtotal 167.00 $10,545.00
Classification Hrs/Miles Rate Total
Misc. Printing $200.00
Direct Subtotal $200.00
Total Design Fees
$10,745.00
Meridian- Uti I ity.xls
CElVED
JAN 2 2 2002
CITY OF MERIDIAi\J
Me
To: Mayor Corrie
From: Brad Watson, P.E.#r/
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk
Date: 1/17/2002
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for January 22 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
January 22 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration (we
would be happy to discuss any of the following items under Department Reports if you wish
to pull these from the Consent Agenda):
1) TFCM Associates Water Main Easement. This is a standard easement agreement
for a water Hne the City will own and maintain on the project site of Retail Outlot A
west of Walmart. A copy of the signed easement is enclosed.
Recommended Council Action: Approval
2) Aire Manufacturina Water Main Easement. This is a standard easement agreement
fqr ~ water line the City will own and maintain on the Aire Manufacturing project site.
A copy of the signed easement is enclosed.
Recommended Council Action: Approval
3) WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1. This is the one and
only change order for this project. It encompasses nine additions to the project
caused by either unknown site conditions or WWTP staff requests. The net change
order amount is $6,Z49.44 bringing the total contract amount to $148,226.44.
Recommended Council Action: approved Change Order No.1 in the amount of
$6,249.44 for the WWTP Generator Installation
Project, for a total contract amount of $148,226.44,
and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to
attest.
From the desk of...
Brad Wa15on, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public WOIks Department
660 E. WIlte.rtower l.ane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
e Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887.1297
waIsonI:@ci.meridian.idus
4) Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for Professional Services.
Our design engineer is requesting an addendum to the Agreement for Professional
Services for all the reasons outlined in their letter to me dated January 2, 2002 (copy
enclosed). We agree completely with their justification. The second phase of the
project is under construction and expected to be completed in next 45 days.
Recommended Council Action: approve the addendum to the Agreement for
Professional Services with JUS Engineers for the Five Mile Relief Sewer
Project to include a contract increase amount of $12,150.66.
We request that the following items be placed on the January 22 City Council agenda, under
Public Works Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) ACHD Proiects (5 separate proiects) - AQreements for Professional Services with
Civil Survey Consultants. These agreements are similar to the ones the City entered
into with JUS Engineers on the ADHD Locust Grove, Fairview to Ustick, Project. We
''finish out" all water and sewer facilities and stub out services, or mains where
appropriate, to all properties not currently connected to City water and sewer. We do
this by have those water and sewer facilities designed by our consultant and
incorporating that design into the ACHD roadway plans. The purpose of this is to 1)
save money by not paying for surface repair, which we would if we did the project
independently of ACHD and 2) provide services to properties ahead of the five-year
no-cut pavement moratorium.
These agreements encompass the five following separate projects (design fee in
parentheses):
1. Franklin Road, East 1st to Nola ($14,925.00)
2. Franklin Road, Nola to East of Gaudian ($14,925.00)
3. Locust Grove & Overland Road Intersection, incl. 1-84 to Overland
($9,795.00)
4. Overland Road, Meridian Rd. to Locust Grove ($10,745.00)
5. Overland Road. Locust Grove to Eagle Rd. ($10,745.00)
The Civil Survey agreements are for design only and are lump-sum amounts.
We solicited these proposals from Civil Survey Consultants because they are
ACHD's roadway designer on the first four projects listed above and the surveyor on
the last two. Civil Survey Consultants has completed over a dozen projects for the
City in the past including well pumping facilities, water and sewer lines, parking lots
and parks. Copies of the agreements are enclosed.
Recommended Council Action (I apologize for this long motion! If you can think of
a way to shorten it, please do): Award the agreements for professional services
to Civil Survey Consultants, for water and sewer design associated with five
separate ACHD roadway projects which are:
. Page 2
1. Franklin Road, East 1st to Nola for lump total of $14,925.00
2. Franklin Road, Nola to East of Gaudian for lump sum total of
$14,925.00
3. Locust Grove & Overland Road Intersection, incl. 1-84 to Overland
for a lump sum total of $9,795.00
4. Overland Road, Meridian Rd. to Locust Grove for a lump sum total
of $10,745.00
5. Overland Road, Locust Grove to Eagle Rd. for a lump sum total of
$10,745.00
and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreements.
2) WWfP UV Disinfection. Grit Basin and Outfall Proiect - Aareement for Professional
Services. We accepted six bids for this project on January 8. The bids were as
follows:
Turn-Key, Inc.
Trammels, Inc.
JC Constructors
Contractors Northwest
Inninger Construction
The Ewing Company
Engineer's Estimate
$578,363.00
$582,500.00
$686,000.00
$729,957.00
$736,029.30
$810,461.17
$650,000
Enclosed is a bid abstract.
Recommended Council Action: Award the contract for construction of the UV
Disinfection, Grit Basin and Outfall Project to Turn-Key, Inc. in the amount of
$578,363.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the
contract.
Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items.
e Page 3
Overland i "ad (Meridian Road to Locus( "rove Road)
In Conjunction with ACHD Project 502005.0
Utility Improvements - City of Meridian
Services are based upon the following scope of services:
A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
1. Add approximately three new services at designated locations.
2. Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 7+30.
3. Extend 8"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 7+50.
4. Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 11 + 1 O.
5. Extend 8"0 water main 80 LF south from Station 13+90.
6. Upgrade existing 6"0 water main to 10"0. Remove 6"0 pipe as necessary. Extend new
1 0"0 water main 980 LF east starting at Station 16+70. Connect to existing main at
Station 26+50.
7. Adjust one fire hydrant/valves.
8. Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 39+50.
9. Extend 10"0 water main 600 LF east from Station 40+50. Connect to existing main at
Station 46+50.
10. Extend 10"0 water main 50 LF north from Station 47+00.
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1. Install new manhole at Station 19+00 and lay 730 LF of 8"0 sewer main to the existing
manhole at Station 26+ 10. Install new manhole at Station 22+20.
2. Install approximately four new services at designated locations.
This plan set will connect to the Locust Grove/Overland Road utility design project we are currently
proposing to design for the City.
We will send a letter to each property owner with vacant ground adjacent to the project. The letter will
advise them of the project, tell them the City will install a service stub to their property at their request,
and advise them the cost of the stub will be charged to them following completion of the work. A copy
Civil Survey Consultants
Man-hour Estimate
Meridian City
Water and Sewer Improvements in Association with
ACHO's Overland Road (Meridian to Locust Grove) Project
Task Description Project Project Technician I Technician II Total
Manae-er Ene-ineer
.
Desie-n
1. Coordination and Meetings 4 4 4 12
2. Cover Sheet (1) 4 4
3. Plan and Profile Sheets (6) 4 60 64
4. General Note Sheet (1) 1 4 5
5. Standard Detail Sheets 4 4
6. Special Provisions & Estimates 2 16 4 22
7. ACHD Coordination 4 4
8. Property Owner Coordinantion 8 16 24
9. Review and Approval 4 8 16 28
Design Total Man.Hours 14 101 52 0 167
Meridian-Utility.xls
January 18, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. ~I 3-J
REQU EST Five Mile Relief Sewer Project - Addendum to Agreement for Professional Services
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERI DIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See attached
~
Ou ~~j0
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
MaterIals presented at public meetingS shalt become property of the City of MerIdian.
--------
~ J.U.8 ~
~
J-U-8 ENGINEERS, Inc.
ENGINEERS' SURVEYORS. PLANNERS
January 2, 2002
Regional Office
250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83709-0944
208-376-7330
Fax: 208.323.9336
Mr. Brad Watson, P.E., City Engineer
City of Meridian, Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian, 10 83642
~EJtVJg;D
jAN 0 4 2002
Dear Mr. Watson:
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER
RE: FIVE MILE RELIEF SEWER. Contract Amendment
We are requesting your consideration to amend contract amounts on the Five Mile Relief
Sewer project. These increases are attributable to several factors, but primarily from an
exhaustive easement acquisition process, phasing of the original project into two phases, and
additional construction coordination and staking. The requested revisions and justifications
are summarized below.
03
Easements, Permitting &
Agency Coordination - TaM
E-onstruction Services- T&M
Estimated
Original Total Revised
Contract Invoices Contract
Amount to11-24-01 Amount Status
$73,486.00 $73,486.00 $74,497.90 Complete
4,182.00 4,483.47 4,483.47 Complete
21,061.00 21,610.29 21,610.29 Complete
Task
No. ' Contract Task
01 Predesign/Design - LS
02 Bid and Award Services - T&M
04
11,712.00 : 16,105.97 ~2,000.00' Ongoing
~ ~I -~,,_.- I -~ . U ~-_... ,._~
CO ,"" 73 . {f.>G.li
'$ IIC )441 - ! liS, t.iSS-\$122.\ 'S '1 (-
Task 01 . Predesign and Design: Significant issues developed with acquisition of the Huskey
easement, requiring the project to be phased into two separate construction projects. We
have incurred additionaL time to prepare two separate construction plan sets and contract
documents. This additional effort reflects a slight increase in contract amount.
. Estimated Phase 2 Construction Budget
Task 02 - Bid and Award Services: Phasing required duplication in preparing bid documents, ,
administering bidding process, and assisting with contract award. )
Task 03 - Easements, Permitting, and Agency Coordination: The easement acquisition proces
was complex and time intensive. Agency permitting process required additional effort sincfY'
the project was phased, requiring duplicative submittaLs. /
...-/
eXI f'~ 'f ~vvv e::~ :f I L.) \ 5 0 ~~ ~..-----
@
~
("J.U.8 }
~
Engi neers Surveyors Planners
Mr. Brad Watson, P. E., City Engineer
January Z, zaGZ
Page Z
Task 04- Construction Services: We were involved in more Phase 1 construction related issues
than anticipated. These included issues with the park bike path and adjacent private
development projects all requiring additional coordination effort. Construction staking was
also very intensive in Phase 1. Lastly, there have been additional costs incurred due to
project phasing. Phasing required remobilization of our survey crew, refurbishment of
temporary construction benchmarks, duplicated construction meeting, and record drawing
data.
Thank you for your consideration of these amendments. We enjoyed working with you and
your staff on this project, and appreciate the opportunity of being a part of the City's
infrastructure development. We vn.lue our long-term relationship. Please contact me at
376-7330 if you need additional information or would like to discuss these items in detail.
Sincerely,
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
J~Jd~
Phillip H. Krichbaum, P.E.
Project Manager
PHK:ldw
Enclosure
r:\proje<:ts\11616\admin\watson . contract amendrrient 1.2-0L.doc
*
January 18,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETiNG
APPLICANT
January 22, 2002
ITEM NO.
9
REQUEST Meridian School District Presentation - Wendell Bigham
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLlCE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
~&; {ii' ilhQGi
w~ ~~?
60 - /~I'
fi ~ "ifrrV
P U\if' I
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
NMPA Growth Projections
1nJ02
CE~D
JAN 2 2 2002
cm OF MERIDlAl"J
Capacity Relationship (GENERALIZED)
Total Grade
Capacity Grades Capacity
650 6 108
1000 3 333 3 Elementary Schools Support 1 Middle School
2000 4 500 1.5 Middle Schools Support 1 High School
Type
Elementary
Middle
Senior
North Meridian Planning Area (Comprehensive Plan, WB)
Sections 10 Low Medium High
Acres 640 Assume 3 6 10
Total Development Acres 6,400 640 640 640
Residential Utilization 77% % Density 42% 32% 3%
Residential Acres 4,928 269 205 19
Houses 17,818 806 1,229 192
K-12 Students/Household 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Total K-12 Students 14,254 645 983 154
Total du/sm 1,782
Number Sq Mile
Students Capacity Schools /School
Elementary Distribution/Square Mile 6/13 0.46 6,557 650 10.09 0.99
Middle Distribution/Square Mile 3/13 0.23 3,278 1,000 3.28 3.05
Senior Distribution/Square Mile 4/13 0.31 4,419 2,000 2.21 4.53
14,254
North Meridian Planning Area (2.95 du/ac)
Sections 10
Houses 15,912 Wardle 01-07-02
K-12 Students/Household O.~
Total K-12 Students 12,73b
Elementary Distribution/Square Mile 6/13
Middle Distribution/Square Mile 3/13
Senior Distribution/Square Mile 4/13
North Meridian Planning Area (3.5 du/ac)
Sections
Houses
K-12 Students/Household
Total K-12 Students
Students
0.46 5,856
0.23 2,928
0.31 3,946
12,730
10
18,850 Wardle 01-07-02
0.8
15,080
Elementary Distribution/Square Mile 6/13
Middle Distribution/Square Mile 3/13
Senior Distribution/Square Mile 4/13
North Meridian Planning Area (4.0 du/ac)
Sections
Houses
K-12 Students/Household
Total K-12 Students
Students
0.46 6,937
0.23 3,468
0,31 4,675
15,080
10
21,550 Wardle 01-07-02
0.8
17,240
Elementary Distribution/Square Mile 6/13
Middle Distribution/Square Mile 3/13
Senior Distribution/Square Mile 4/13
Investment Based On 4.0 du/ac
Quantity cre/Scho
13 12
4 40
3 55
20
Total Acres
156
160
165
481
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Totals
Land Cost
Bldg Cost
Investment Total
InvestmenUSM
19,280,000
238,500,000
257,780,000
25,778,000
Students
0.46 7,930
0.23 3,965
0.31 5,344
17,240
Land
40,000
6,240,000
6,400,000
6,600,000
19,280,000
SF/Bldg
61,000
135,000
250,000
Capacity
650
1,000
1,800
3,450
Capacity
650
1,000
1,800
Capacity
650
1,000
1,800
Total SF
793,000
540,000
750,000
2,083,000
RECEIV~D
JAN 2 2 2002
CITY OF MERIDL4J'I
Number
Schools
9.01
2.93
2.19
Number
Schools
10.67
3.47
2.60
Number
Schools
12.20
3.97
2;97
$/School
6,500,000
13,000,000
34,000,000
Sq Mile
/School
1.11
3.42
4.56
Sq Mile
/School
0.94
2.88
3.85
Sq Mile
/School
0.82
2.52
3.37
Total Bldg
84,500,000
52,000,000
102,000,000
238,500,000
RECEI'lED
?'!!
~ t.
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN
OFF SCHEDULED FOR 01/23/02
City of Meridian
City CleX'k Office,
MAY 0 R: This is to inform you in writing, if you so
choose, that you have the right to a predetermination
hearing at 8:30 P.M. Tuesday, January 22, 2002, before the
Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged
on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that
your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may
retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on January
23, 2002 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone
present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and
trash delinquency?
(No response.)
MA YOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal
or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth
Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even
though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The
amount of the turn-off list is $39,040.54.
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page' 1
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :46am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer.Cust No" (<} 9900000
Last Pmt Last Pm!
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
15,0029.2 HALL. JOHN & CAROLYN 107.77 65.92 41.85 11/28/2001 49.23 -
34.0281.1 A & S CONSTRUCTION 330.48 134.46 196.02
1,3980.1 ADA COUNTY OPERATIONS 186.43 160.82 35.61 12/19/2001 76.41 - none
2.1480,2 AFFINITY CARE 286.93 176.05 110.88 01/15/2002 300.00 -
15.0060.3 AHERN,ROXANNE 116.85 68.68 48.17 11/29/2001 85.88.
74.3698.2 ALBIN, CATHY 67.64 33.16 34.48 11/19/2001 78.66 -
50.1476.1 ALl & FARHA ISHAQ, SABIHA 761.46 365.62 332.92 62.92 01/1812002 303.00 - none
31.3422.1 ALLEN, TIM 119.81 77.41 40.62 1.78 12/1812001 40.00 - none
35.0194.4 ALLMOND, JOSEPH & TAKEIA 93.59 40.67 52.92 11119/2001 38.16 -
20.1510.1 ALLRED, JAY D. 92.15 85.07 7.08 01/04/2002 30.94 - none
19.6556.2 AMAR. STEVE 93.87 67.19 26.68 12/19/2001 26.68 -
222108.1 AMERICRAFT HOMES 97.84 63.36 34.48 12/2012001 34.48 -
21.2020.1 ANDERS, JOSEPH 67.15 65.92 1.23 12/18/2001 29.13 - none
2.0860.1 ANDERSON. DEAN 112.05 72.51 39.54 11/26/2001 77.55. none
21.2076.2 ANDERSON. LADELL 177.14 143.68 33.46 12/17/2001 47.21 -
22.1482.1 ANDERSON, LYLE D. 141.03 85.07 55.96 11/2812001 153.05 - none
60.4502.2 ANDERSON,STAN 67.64 33.16 34.48 11/28/2001 34.48 -
21.2070.1 ANKENMAN, MICHAEL A 125.55 85.07 40.48 12/18/2001 45.56 - none
2.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 156.63 97,83 58.80 12/19/2001 70.00 - none
68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 86.45 44.45 41.85 .15 12/17/2001 54.00 - none
42.1988.2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 110.30 58.32 51.98 12/18/2001 63.05 -
53.0700.1 ARNOLD MACHINERY 627.02 297.76 292.51 36.75 12/18/2001 292.51 - none
21.1708.1 ARTE, MICHELLE & RICK 141.19 92.73 48.46 12/07/2001 50.00 - none
4.0520.1 ATTERBERRY. DENNIS 88.62 68.26 30.36 11/26/2001 3036 - none
21.1930.3 BAILEY, LESLIE 109.02 84.00 25.02 01/16/2002 1315-
2.3550.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 17903 6102 118.01 12/06/2001 50.00 -
5H1694.1 BAILEY, PEGGY 110.32 62.29 48.03 12/13/2001 3680 - none
3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 329.63 131.03 57.17 55.94 85.49 11/26/2001 70.00 - none
4.0502.2 BAKER,ROBERT 118.98 73,58 45.40 11/20/2001 102.73 -
5.0278.1 BALE. CLARENCE & SUSAN 116.10 69,75 46.35 11/21/2001 89.40 - none
42.1940.1 BALL, TIMOTHY R 89.11 4451 44.60 11/27/2001 11350 - none
42.1202.1 BANNER, SCOTT 61.37 35.61 25.76 10/25/2001 100.00 - none
69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 412.85 234.77 66,13 109.95 11/20/2001 146.94 - none
1.2790,3 BARINSKY. CYNTHIA 113.94 69,75 44.19 11/29/2001 100.26 -
46.0106.1 BARNES, DAVID 79.92 4573 34.19 12/14/2001 36.65 - none
16.3508.2 BARNEY, T. 87.84 53.36 34.48
21.1894.1 BARNHART, CLINTON 85.24 62.09 23.15 11/28/2001 100.00 - none
50,1912.2 BARNHART. RICK 92.40 52.02 40.34 .04 11/15/2001 75.35 -
3.0120,1 BARREn, PALMER 139.62 95.49 44.13 12/18/2001 66.00 - none
42.1966.1 BARRY, CLAY A 126.73 67.08 59.65 12/24/2001 60 00 - none
2,0472.1 BARTH, JEFF 86.19 53.36 32.83 11/2112001 124.40 - none
50.1022.1 BEACH,ARTHUR 117,66 65.63 62.03 11/09/2001 4242 - none
31.3042.1 BEAN. ALAN & JENNY 127.23 84.00 43.23 12/18/2001 57,99 - none
14.5010.2 BEAUCANNON. JUSTIN 76.62 73.58 3.04 12/24/2001 35.00 -
34,0942.1 BECK, J1M 78.24 59.97 18.27 01/11/2002 98.51 - none
32,0950.1 BECKER, NICHOLAS 115.62 74.86 40.76 12/18/2001 70 00 - none
22.1560.1 BEESE, JEFFREY 116.97 76.34 40.63 12/18/2001 53,09 - none
2,5690.3 BELL, DERRICK 266.75 5826 29.13 62,34 117,02 07/27/2001 108,96.
16.3010.1 BENCO INC 128.84 53.36 36.68 2668 12.12 09/07/2001 52,76 -
46.0836.1 BENNETT. GREG 82.06 40.68 41.38 12/1612001 35.00 - none
33.2772.2 BENNEn. GREG 67.36 67,35 ,01 01/11/2002 71.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account list- council Page' 2
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11:46am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Dale Amount Msg
2.3600.1 BENNETT. HOWARD 87.34 57.19 30.15 11/16/2001 50.00. none
19.6688.1 BENNETT. MASON 136.92 85.07 51.85 11/28/2001 89.44 . none
33.2596.1 BENTLEY, A 97.65 54.63 43.02 11/13/2001 120.00. none
21.0130.1 BESKER, GLORIA 161.25 111.86 49.37 12/16/2001 53.06 - none
32.0656.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 109.37 56.00 53.37 11/28/2001 120.88 - none
22.1740.3 BINGHAM, DUNCAN & PAULINE 105.31 65.92 39.39 1112612001 79,64 -
4.1834.1 BITONI, MARK 117.75 77.41 40.34 12/17/2001 51.41. none
3.0308,1 BITTNER, MICHAEL 114.06 73.56 40.48 12/18/2001 38.02 - none
31.3372.2 BLACK, KENNETH 116.97 84.00 32,97 11/20/2001 107.46 -
2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 126.40 95.07 31.33 12/19/2001 48.00 . none
4,2200.1 BLA YE, LUCREZIA 118,03 85.07 32.96 11/28/2001 108,60 - none
33.2730.1 BLEAZARD. BARRETT 64.24 36.99 27.25 12/18/2001 35,00 - none
34.0744.1 BLEDSOE. JOHN & STEPHANIE 95,08 56.00 39.08 11/27/2001 63.00. none
65,0264.1 BLISS. STEVEN 97.70 53.25 44.45 11/15/2001 55.52 - none
2.0488,1 BaBKa. RAYMOND 111.91 72.51 39.40 12/03/2001 49,24 - none
74.2332.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 161.74 98.79 57.17 5.78 12/17/2001 60.00 -
33.4154.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 46.99 36.99 10.00 11/29/2001 174.22 -
4.1150.2 BODILY, DANIEL 86.51 58.26 28.25 12/03/2001 30.00 -
51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 75,88 36.05 29.71 10.12 0111612002 20.82 . none
31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 129.83 84.00 45.83 12/18/2001 45.83 . none
52.0246.1 BOLO'S PUB & EATERY 784.69 259.98 268.71 256.00 01/02/2002 268,71 - none
21.2794.2 BOMER, MICHAEL 113.83 68.68 45.15 12/18/2001 60,71 -
8.0002,1 BOND CAMPBELL 110.99 91,39 19.60 12/18/2001 18.57 -
34.1318,2 BOOHER, CRAIG & DANA 130.56 66,12 64.44 11/28/2001 176.23 .
46.0468.1 BORCHARDT, KEVIN & TINA 90.20 54.63 35.57 12/04/2001 44,18 - none
50.0230.2 BORG,GREGORY 105.64 36,68 34.48 34.48
21.2798,1 BORUP. KEITH 102.71 73.58 29.13 11/20/2001 29.13 - none
74.0660.2 BOSSART-HILL. CANDACE 63.28 5327 10.01 12/26/2001 70,00 -
21.2124.3 BOUDREAU, YVETTE 1 23.44 87.41 35.42 .61 12/19/2001 33.00 -
6.1914.1 BOULDER CREEK HOMES 46.72 33.76 6.48 6.48
32.1326.1 BOURN, KARA 35.98 35,61 .37 01/02/2002 29.13 - none
51.4310.1 BOWER INVESTMENTS, LLP 60.24 33.36 26.88 12/27/2001 50.64 -
42.0378.1 BRECKS, JOSH & SHARI 64.76 54.76 10.00 12/17/2001 75.32 - none
21.0178.2 BREINHOL T, AARON 95.50 61.02 34.48
34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 67.50 36.99 30.51 12/17/2001 53.88 - none
5.0264.1 BRENNAN. TERRENCE 189.91 127.20 62,71 0110712002 130.00 - none
16,3306.2 BREWER, CHRIS & ELIZABETH 125.55 81.24 44.31 12/18/2001 48.00 -
32.0926,1 BRIGGS. NADINE 102.92 59.69 43.23 12/18/2001 56.78 - none
31.2306.1 BRIGHT, LEANN 96.84 73.58 23.26 12/11/2001 70.00 - none
135104 BRINEGAR, E. E 87B4 53.36 34.48
2.3712.2 BRINEGAR, E.E. 95.05 65,92 29,13 12/03/2001 29.13 -
2.1320.1 BRINEGAR, ELVIN 188.79 126.13 62,66 12/04/2001 230.77 - none
212564.4 BRINEGAR, KATHLEEN 3547 27.72 7.75 12/19/2001 50.00 -
310164.1 BRITTON, TIMOTHY 71.44 68.68 2.76 12/24/2001 26.68 - none
19.4456.1 BROOKS FULLER HOMES 214.80 58.26 36,93 36.93 82.68 01/1112002 60.00 - none
33.3762.1 BROWN, DOMONIC 76.39 42.05 34.34 11/16/2001 39.57 - none
69.0574.1 BROWN. JAMES & SHERRY 58.26 43.28 15.00 12/18/2001 100.31 - none
74.3810.1 BROWN, ROBERT 74.86 44.50 30.36 11/21/2001 34.05 - none
197174.1 BRUCE, ROBERT 68.01 87.19 82 12/1912001 65.00 -
31.3306.1 BRYANT, JAMIE 142.27 80.17 62.10 12/17/2001 64.56. none
42.0344.2 BRYTE, LUELLA 86.83 58.46 3037 11119/2001 27.91 -
34.18441 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 119.47 69.95 49.52 12/24/2001 59.36 - none
1954944 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 11283 73.58 39.25 11/26/2001 75,67.
19.7150.2 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 91.22 62.09 29.13 11/15/2001 34.16 -
50.4226.2 BURCHTORT, JOHN & KAREN 81.45 33.16 3448 13.81 11/09/2001 24.75 -
n. in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3
Standard Paymenl Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :47am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
31.3364.1 BURGESS. ALLEN 97.62 68.66 29.14 11/14/2001 71.51 - none
34.0856.1 BURGESS.ARLUS 70.47 69.95 .52 01/08/2002 67.00 - none
31.0720.2 BURKE,MARY 99.19 68.68 30.51 11/26/2001 31.74 -
50.4008.2 BURNHAM. DARLA 36.42 35.62 .80 12/18/2001 41.06 -
2.4890.2 BURNS, EMMETT 188.63 100.39 49.09 39.15 12/20/2001 30.00 -
34.1456.1 BURROUGHS, JEFF 115.64 67.35 48.29 1112812001 53.21 - none
2.1250.1 BURSON, LORI 92.64 53.36 39.28 11/28/2001 86.55 - none
42.2460.1 BURTON, JACK 99.11 45.74 53.37 11/2812001 74.57 - none
34.1526.1 BURTON, RYAN 71.33 40.82 30.51 11/21/2001 41.58 - none
21.0472.1 BUTTERFIELD, BRIAN 113.94 69.75 44.19 11/2912001 69.24 - none
4.1392.1 BYINGTON. DARREN 91.22 62.09 29.13 12/04/2001 31.59 - none
50.0724.1 C.FJ. INVESTMENTS 36.46 33.16 3.32 01/15/2002 52.80 -
34.1100.1 CALliSTER, BROCK 56.59 43.16 13.43 12/1912001 35.00 - none
21 .0522.1 CAlWELL. MARC 98.07 75.92 22.15 12/19/2001 35.00 - none
14.4488.2 CAMPBELL SR, DOUGLAS T 61.80 53.36 8.44 12/1412001 28.24 -
14.2998.1 CAMPBELL, ROBERT 96.68 63.36 33.32 01/14/2002 109.28 -
1.1370.1 CAMPBELL. ROBERT & JENNIF 130.99 67.83 30.37 12.79 11/27/2001 40.00 - none
31.0010.1 CANDACE ADKINS 177.15 131.51 45.64 12/0312001 86.65 - none
21.3279 1 CANDLEllGHT\ COMMUNTITY 422.82 158.76 264.06 10115/2001 896.14 - none
4.1796.1 CAPRA!. JOHN & SARAH 204.63 115.71 65.36 23.56 01/0412002 100.00 - none
3.0048.3 CARLO. CHRISTA 162.49 152.94 9.55 12/17/2001 100.00 -
4.2166.2 CARPENTER,SEAN 136.37 64.85 71.52 12/2412001 113.34 -
21.0030.1 CARRANZA, TIM 151.Q1 104.22 41i79 11/2812001 43.00 - none
22.1160.3 CARSON, JEFFERY & PAMELA 115.16 72.51 42.65 01117/2002 34.34 -
69.1122.2 CARTER, J.R 113.50 72.64 40.86 12/18/2001 65.00 -
50.2108.1 CASELLA, GARY 59.84 33.16 26.66 11/1612001 66.75 - none
32,04461 CAVINESS, WILLIAM A. 94.26 51.90 42.36 12/19/2001 68.93 . none
48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C~ 689.36 502~97 186039 0110912002 47648 -
1.0720.3 CHANDLER, ALLAN 80.04 53.36 26.68 11/27/2001 26.68 -
42.11402 CHANDLER, ALLAN 94.03 55.86 38.17 11/19/2001 187.97 -
21.2658.1 CHAPPELL, ANTHONY 82.41 58.26 24.15 12/17/2001 8.67 - none
42.2387.1 CHATEAU MEADOWS HOME A 9.72 9.72 12/0312001 17.82 - none
42,1915.1 CHATEAU MEADOWS HOMEO 17.82 17.82 12/03/2001 24.30 - none
50.1774.1 CHERRY'S BUILTIN VACS 353.73 204.79 148.94 12/18/2001 321.35 - none
31.3262.1 CHRISTENSEN, ROBERT 92.76 64.85 27.91 12/1712001 25.00. none
20.1606.3 CHRISWELL, LEE ANNA 276.07 77.41 44.31 57.84 96.51 1111612001 20.00 -
32.1278.1 CHURCH. LARRY 78.04 33.16 44.88 12/1812001 47.34. none
742676.1 CHURCHMAN, KAREN LEE 94.44 57.08 37.36 12/2412001 75.00 . none
22.1486.1 CHURCHMAN. STEVE J. 125.69 85.07 40.62 12/04/2001 50.46 - none
51.30141 ClOP ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. 63.50 33.76 29.74 11/20/2001 95.04 - none
26050 1 CLARK, DOUG AND JOYCE 100.19 66,66 33.53 12/20/2001 38.45 . none
31.3056.2 CLARK, RANDY 124.32 86.90 35.42 12/18/2001 40]8.
46.0284.1 CLARK, TROY 70.36 40.67 29.69 12/18/2001 45.00 - none
40.0432.1 CLARKE, JOHN 128.69 128.69 0711712001 73,28 - none
1.2020.1 CLEMENTS, ROBERT 88.93 61.02 27.91 12117/2001 31.60 . none
20.0170 1 CLEMSON. ALVIN 105.70 99.32 6.38 01/14/2002 57.32 - none
35.7999.1 CM COMPANY 64.80 43.74 21.06
40.0066.1 COCHELL, TIM & ANGEUA 69.96 35.62 34,34 11108/2001 38.03 - none
50.2122 1 COLE, DANIEL & RENEE 77.77 55.73 22.04 12/24/2001 75.00 - none
510874,1 COLE, ORVILLE 84.91 47.54 37.37 11/1512001 75.62 - none
21650.1 COLLINS. TERRY 8842 63.25 25.17 11/19/2001 35.48 . none
74.3650.2 COLSON. CHRIS 60.44 34.39 2605 12/24/2001 41.00 -
33.01961 COMBA. TRUDY 285.75 230.57 55.18 11/2912001 81.99 - none
33.0206 1 COMBA, TRUDY 248.58 127.53 12105 11/2912001 135.00 - none
21.3299.1 COMMUNITY PROPERTY 495.97 168.48 327.49 10115/2001 753.05 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 4
Standard Payment Customers Ja n 22,2002 11:4 7am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquenl Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
32.0726.1 CONNER. RANDY 90.48 45.88 44.60 11/27/2001 51.98 . none
65.3092.4 CONRAD, GERALD 67.64 33.16 34.48
19.0138.1 CONRAD, ROSS 83.87 57.19 26.68 12/18/2001 26.68 . none
5.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 109.17 68.68 40.49 12/18/2001 60.17 . none
22.1388.1 COOK-PAVIGNANO, PAMELA T 87.39 56.26 29.13 11115/2001 35.28 . none
42.2992.1 COPE, TIMOTHY 67.50 34.39 33.11 12/07/2001 43.11. none
74.3816.1 CORDELL, TODD 128.05 128.05 07/18/2001 80.00. none
4.1746.1 COSGROVE, AMY 107.39 68.26 39.13 12/19/2001 46.35 - none
31 .3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 109.72 67.19 42.53 12/19/2001 30.00 . none
34.1312.1 COULTER, SCOTT 34.89 33.16 1.73 01/15/2002 69.48 . none
35.0228.1 COVINO, PETER III 101.39 58.31 43.08 11/19/2001 49.39 -
2,4770.1 COX. CHRISTI 187.90 121.88 59.49 6.53 12/19/2001 158.13 - none
74.1030.2 COX, HERALD 83.41 48.93 34.48
22.0922.4 COX, KATHY 140.61 85.07 55.54 11/2912001 89.48 -
33.3592.1 CRADER. PAMELA 254.67 30.07 224.60 07/18/2001 48.52 - none
2.4610.1 CRAGIN. ANNE R. 90.02 57.19 32.83 11/27/2001 53.39 - none
42.2358.1 CRANDALL, LARRY 74.86 41.90 32.96 12/12/2001 48.95 - none
74.0100.2 CRAWFORD. SARAH 77.64 33.16 44.48 12/17/2001 34.48 -
21.0064.1 CREEKSIDE DEVELOPMENT 139.84 114.64 25.20 12/17/2001 45.41 . none
33.2376.2 CRONER,CHAD 148.88 48.17 45.97 54.74 10/24/2001 136.79 -
42.4070.1 CROSS, ARBY 65.97 36.84 29.13 12/12/2001 32.82 - none
74.2834.1 CROWLEY. BILLY 133.26 77.32 55.94 12/17/2001 74.39 - none
74.2692.2 CUSHMAN, KELLY 105.36 60.91 44.45 12/18/2001 50.60 -
21.2922.2 CUTLER. JASON & KIMBERLY 269.71 144.86 54.43 70.42 10/16/2001 163.47 -
4.0686.2 DA ROSA, JULIE 125.86 84.00 41.86 11/20/2001 40.63 -
50.0284.3 DALE, MARK 59.84 33.16 26.68 12/06/2001 30.37 -
2.0080.1 DALlCE PLUMBING 95.61 61.02 27.91 6.68 12/12/2001 30.00 - none
42.2388.2 DAlY,BERT 188.38 39.44 34.19 37.88 76.87 11/21/2001 310.26 -
50.4574.3 DAROSA, JOE 58.84 33.16 25.68
1.3910.1 DAVCO SERVICES INC 373.90 363.27 10.63 12/18/2001 183.55 - none
22.1420.1 DAVENPORT. DUANE 81.84 75.92 5.92 12/19/2001 60.00 . none
33.2414.2 DAVIS, WALTER 90.97 87.73 3.24
42.0456.3 DAY. BARBARA 96.35 54.49 41.86 11/14/2001 20.85 -
65.0648.2 DECKER,STANLEY 87.44 50.79 36.65 12/0312001 35.42 -
72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 69.80 38.07 31.73 12/04/2001 32.96 - none
320800.2 DELANEY, RITA 149.24 69.81 79.43 12/18/2001 69.00 -
35.0246.1 DENALI CONSTRUCTION 84.62 46.96 37.66 01/17/2002 12.96 -
33.4254.1 DENNEY, BRIAN 39.82 39,45 .37 01/08/2002 30.00 - none
40.0034.2 DEROCK, ROSS & RENEE 57.68 57.08 .60 12/12/2001 36.00 -
69.1332.2 DESPAIN, BRENT 62.09 29.13 32.96 12/06/2001 67,40 -
7.0976.1 DESPOT, DAVID 117.61 69.75 47.86 11/27/2001 122.41 . none
69.0612.1 DEVANEY, JAMES & LYNDA 71.95 36.84 35.11 12/05/2001 55.00 . none
46.5070.1 DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED 65.76 57.66 6,48 1.62
34.0788.1 DEVER, THOMAS & LYNETTE 130.10 68.72 44,46 16.92 12/14/2001 44.46 - none
31.0812.1 DICK, JERALD & AUDRIA 125.64 87.83 37.81 12/05/2001 60.00 - none
2.1960.1 DICKSON. DONALD M 124.65 76.34 48.31 11/28/2001 109.69 . none
22.0978.1 DilLON, RANDY J 99.97 65.92 34.05 12/06/2001 42.66 - none
33.2528.1 DllULO. THOMAS 62.20 6217 .03 12/19/2001 68.00 - none
69.0490.1 DIXON, SCOTT & HEATHER 38.98 35.62 3.36 01/17/2002 35.00 - none
3.0700.1 DOBARAN, JOHN & ARVElLA 390.02 277.39 112.63 12/19/2001 104.97 - none
4.1166.2 DONALDSON. NEAL 120.23 83.58 36.65 12/1912001 51.57 -
4.1838.2 DONLON, DANIEL & ROBIN 111.21 53.36 57.85 12/11/2001 71.38 -
34.2040.1 DOTY, CURTIS 113.18 67.35 45.83 11107/2001 130.72 - none
50.1232.1 DOTY, JOSHUA 119.79 77.49 42.30 12/27/2001 54.00. none
65.0800.1 DOTY, KENDALL & SHELLEY 177.31 82.39 94.92 11/07/2001 139.20 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :47am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
74.1062.1 DOTY. PAULINE & RON 64.67 36.19 28.48 11/19/2001 58.11 - none
42.04711 DOVEMEADOWS HOMEOWNE 3.24 3.24 11/09/2001 10.82 -
31.0828.3 DOWNIE, JASON D 110.65 80.17 30.48 12/18/2001 50.00 -
32.4912.3 DRUCE, RICHARD & SYBIL 44.17 43.27 .90
4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 120.21 73.58 46.63 12/18/2001 68.93 - none
51.0698.2 DUEROCK, WALTER 39.64 33.16 6.48 08110/2001 24.08 -
19.0072.2 DUGGINS, ROY & ALTHEA 106.42 58.26 48.16 11/28/2001 77.18.
14.5004.2 DUNCAN, JEFF & MONIGUE 103.02 64.85 38.17 11119/2001 61.12-
34.0398.1 DUNCAN. RICHARD 105.26 56.00 49.26 11/2912001 110.36 - none
74.3042.1 DUNKLE. GARY 69.80 40.67 29.13 11/15/2001 37.74 - none
34.2802.1 DUNSTAN, BRETT & MICHELLE 108.38 48.19 60.19 11/28/2001 70.03 - none
4.0886.1 DUVALL, DEBORAH 104.57 62.09 42.48 11/28/2001 60.00 - none
42.2396.3 DUVALL. KEN & PATTII 74.88 40.82 34.06 11/05/2001 120.71 -
34.0746.2 DUVALL. KENNETH 127.13 77.47 49.66 11/21/2001 141.97-
2.5010.1 EARLEY, GEORGE 80.04 53.36 26.68 12/18/2001 26.68 . none
42.2598.2 EASTBURN,GARY 107.82 62.14 45.68 12/24/2001 48.14 -
2.1690.3 EBLEN,EARL 3914 10.00 29.14
48.1858.1 ECONO LUBE & TUNE INC. #30 178.10 92.29 85.81 12/24/2001 92.29 - none
31.3034.1 EDWARDS, MARILYN 76.72 53.36 23.36 12/17/2001 30.00 - none
33.2558.1 EL-BAKRI KIMBERLY 59.84 33.16 26.68 11/28/2001 26.68 - none
72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASS 16.20 16.20 11/15/20D1 223.56 - none
68.0138.1 ELliNGTON. BRUCE 72.35 40.62 31.73 12/17I2D01 35.42 - none
48.16D1.1 ELliOTT GROUP LLC 604.26 42.12 562.14
69.16D2.1 ELWOOD. DELBERT 57.19 26.68 3D.51 11/16/20D1 42.81 - none
74.2686.1 EPPERSON,DAREN 62.13 35.61 26.52 12/D5/2D01 SD.OO - none
50.1242.2 ERHART, MILT 82.52 45.59 36.93 11/14/2D01 73.49 -
5D.1238.1 ERHART, MILT 367.55 44.37 50.91 43.37 228.9D 09/21/2DD1 5D.00 - none
22.1634.1 ERICKSON, EVA LOUISE 91.22 62.09 29.13 12/17/20D1 4D.20 - none
5D.1354.2 ESTATE OF BESSIE MATCHAM 92.29 63.52 28.77 11/21/2001 6D.00.
74.3614.1 FACKRELL, THOMAS 64.74 35.61 29.13 11/19/2001 61.58 - none
21.1172.4 FALK. RICHARD 162.79 118.4 7 44.32 11/27/2001 131.16 -
13.4998.2 FARNHAM, DARIN & STACIE 111.63 64.85 46.78 11/27/2D01 44.32 -
34.1806.1 FAULKNER, FREDA 47.51 45.88 1.63 01/11/2002 25.0D - none
33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 244.40 44.51 40.77 39.54 119.58 12/03/2001 82.17 - none
31.013D.3 FEAVER. ANNIE 87.84 53.36 34.48 12/18/2001 24.63.
74.1006.1 FISHEL. GEORGE 353.53 78.36 275.17 12/D3/2D01 32D.02 - none
74.1056.1 FISHER, BEA J. 68.73 42.05 26.68 12/18/2001 31.60 - none
74.D406.1 FISHER. CASEY L 59.66 34.39 25.27 12/14/20D1 30.00 - none
72,0274.1 FITZGERALD, JUANITA 90.20 50.66 39.54 12/05/2001 77 .67 . none
5.0800.1 FITZSIMMONS, TOM 92.62 61.02 31.60 12/18/2001 5D.05 - none
1.1160.2 FLATEN, BOB 283.77 80.17 203.60 11/28/2001 173.21 -
1.11643 FLATEN. ROBERT 92.90 57.19 35.71 12/12/2001 39.4D -
34.2084.1 FLORCZY III, ALEXANDER S 128.56 78.70 49.86 11/26/2001 68.13 - none
482694.1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 1.739.39 1.131.74 607.65 12/24/2001 1.516.33 - none
22.2498.2 FORBES, LONNIE & BRANDI 99.33 64.85 34.48 11/19/2D01 1D8.75-
52.D 15D. 1 FORS, GARY 58.9D 33.16 25.74 12/03/2DO 1 27.00 . none
49.1140.1 FORSYTHE. DAROL 505.18 243.85 261.33 11/20/2001 293.53 . none
34.1288.1 FOURNIER, JAMES 98.39 61,06 37.33 12/19/2001 55.DO - none
22.1618.1 FOWERS, JOHN 144.53 97.63 46.90 12/18/2001 73.96 - none
74.3830.2 FOWLER, ALiSA 59.52 33.16 26.36 11/27/2001 27,00 -
21.0190.1 FOX. TRAVIS 62.54 61.02 1.52 01103/2002 35.00 - none
31.3434.1 FRANK, GARY 190.02 76.34 55.69 57.99 11/28/2001 57.84. none
2.5840.1 FRANK, GARY 116.27 87.83 28.44 D1/D3/2002 50.0D - none
74.0350.1 FRANK, GARY E 110.74 59.57 51.17 12/26/2D01 54.86 - none
210160,2 FRANZEN, JAKE 117.27 75.92 4135 12/20/2DO 1 100.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice IS to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :48am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Ba lance Non.Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30f2001 Date Amount Msg
68.0290.2 FREEMAN, CRAIG 67.15 32.96 34.19 12/12/2001 40.34 -
51.3078.3 FREEMAN. NICOLE 41,14 39.88 1.26 01/10/2002 30.00 -
2.4930.4 FREEMAN, SARAH 163.98 128.27 35.71 11107/2001 107.79 -
33.4258.1 FROSTRDM, STEVE & TERRI 77.17 59.57 17.60 12/19/2001 109.12 - none
4.1454.1 FUENTES.CHRYSTLE 125.41 77.41 48.00 11/21/2001 129.00 - none
32.1666.2 FURSTENAU, FRED & LONA 83.25 52.60 30.65 12/18/2001 30.00 -
33.7602.1 GALLION, RICHARD 68.66 47.29 21.37 11/26/2001 21.00 . none
50.0530.2 GALLOWAY, JERMAINE & KRIS 59.84 33.16 26.68 12/10/2001 44.66 -
31.2250.1 GARCIA. ANOTONIO 190.56 106.56 84.00 12/19/2001 75.23 - none
50.1996.2 GARCIA, CHRISSY 66.57 64.89 1.68 12/11/2001 54.00 -
22.0476.1 GARDNER. LAWRENCE 115.29 73.58 41.71 11/19/2001 138.40 - none
50.1198.1 GARDOSKI, WILLIAM 80.22 52.31 27.91 12/14/2001 37.75 - none
21.3048.2 GARLICK. LEWIS 309.76 194.65 115.11 12/19/2001 140.00 -
20.1726.1 GARRIGUS. SCOTT 234.22 161.67 72.37 .18 11/28/2001 150.02 - none
65.0382.1 GARY COFFMAN 82,68 48.34 34.34 12/03/2001 47.87 - none
46.0188.2 GATES. JOHN 172,17 127.83 44.34 11/28/2001 69.61 -
34.1900.1 GATES, SANFORD E, 64.90 38.22 26.68 11/21/2001 26.68 - none
2.0950.1 GAYTHIWAITE. RITCHIE & SUS 116.83 80.17 36.66 12/18/2001 56.34 - none
34.2896.2 GAYTHWAITE. LARRY & TAMI 45.03 44.51 .52 12/18/2001 68.00.
51.0832.1 GENERATIONS II 202.27 44.16 37.68 69.79 50.64
13.4000.1 GERRY BURKE 110.33 63.16 34.04 13.13 10/23/2001 34.83 -
22.1596,3 GIAUQUE, PAUL 113.28 76.34 36.94 11/26/2001 36.94 -
2.0852.2 GIESLER. ANGELA 94.16 65.92 28.24 12/18/2001 30.00.
2.2480.1 GILBERT. CARL 145.15 87.83 57.32 12/18/2001 56.09 - none
15.0278.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 112.12 43.16 34.48 34.48 10/09/2001 12.96 -
15.0108.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 94.32 53.36 34.48 6.48 10/09/2001 6.48-
35.0152.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 26.38 26.38 10/09/2001 28.04 -
35.0256.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 156.26 46.97 38.17 71.12 08/03/2001 69.24 -
68.0150.1 GLENN, SHANE & JENNIFER 70.98 36.79 34.19 11/28/2001 40.34 - none
4.2160.2 GLUMM, DENNIS 143.22 84.00 59.22 11/08/2001 92.4 7 -
15.0156.1 GNG CONSTRUCTION 80.68 74.20 6.48
22.0310.1 GODSIL, MICHAEL & KORRENA 83.68 65.92 17.76 12/14/2001 40DO - none
3.0344.1 GOODNER. TIM AND MARYAN 140.39 106.56 33.83 12/19/2001 75.00 - none
21 .2790.1 GORRINGE, BENNY 164.96 114.22 50.74 12/24/2001 49.51 - none
31.3374.1 GOULDING, PAULINE 174.56 133.79 40.77 12/17/2001 39.85 - none
50.3908.1 GRAHAM, JOHN & KATHLEEN 33.87 33.16 .71 12/24/2001 25.00 - none
33.0101.1 GRAND AUTO #04533 122.51 48.60 73.91 01/17/2002 48.60 - none
33.4276.1 GRANT, DARYLL & PENNY 75.00 43.27 31.73 11/26/2001 32.96 . none
32.1256.2 GRASS, JOYCE 83.86 36.99 26.87 12/18/2001 31.18 -
74.3954.2 GRAY, DAVID & NATALIE 101.48 63.66 37.82 12/18/2001 40.00 -
4.1206.1 GREEN, KEVIN 89.85 58.26 31.59 12/03/2001 29.77 - none
21.1556.2 GREER. RANDY 87.39 58.26 29.13 11/05/2001 29.13 -
51.0958.3 GRIEVE, JAMES 31.53 27.67 3.86 11/26/2001 15.98 -
51.0938.4 GRIEVE. JAMES 78.38 49.81 28.57 11/21/2001 34.22 -
31.0158.1 GRIFFIN, RICHARD & GAIL 136.26 91.66 44.60 12/19/2001 4706 - none
50.2412.3 GRISHAM, DANIEL & JANET 71.63 40.68 30.95 12/06/2001 35.27 -
2.4290.1 GROSSO. SHADOW 67,79 67.19 .60 01f17/2002 26.38 - none
3.0034.1 GROUND, JENNIFER 106.91 65.92 40.99 12/06/2001 42.71 - none
69.0578,1 GROVES, DARRELL & NANCY 111.65 63.37 48.28 12/19/2001 63.04 - none
65.0416.1 GUTH, KEVIN 40.98 39.45 153 12/03/2001 59.21 - none
32.1360.2 HAILEY. SEAN 67.64 33.18 34.48
20.1478.2 HAKE. KAREN 366.81 73.58 313.23 11/29/2001 300.00 -
22.2088.1 HALE DEVELOPMENT 54.50 53.36 114 01/10/2002 25.54 -
4.1594.1 HALL, BRIAN 124.07 72.51 5156 11/13/2001 10837 - none
31 .2300.1 HALLOCK, DOUGLAS S. 115.71 73,58 42.13 11/19/2001 11341 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :48am
Current Period: 01/3112002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
2.0484.2 HANSON, KELLY & AISHA 342.53 268.69 73.84 11/19/2001 192.89 -
32,0604.2 HANSON, PHILIP 44.84 33.16 11.68 12/18/2001 15.00 -
33.2368.2 HARNECK. KARl 73.93 36.99 36.94 11128/2001 35.71 -
34.0834.1 HARRIS, DERREK G 99.37 52.17 47.20 12/17/2001 52.12. none
31.2264.2 HARTLEY, QUENTIN ROLAND 134,17 80.17 54.60 11/28/2001 98.74-
21 .1776.2 HARTSOOK, HOWARD 72.65 65.92 6.73 10/22/2001 68.36 -
2.4630.1 HARVEY, BRUCE G. 148.15 91.66 55.55 .94 11/28/2001 112.00 - none
2.5900.1 HARVEY, LISA M. 155.51 124.64 30.87 12/19/2001 50.00 - none
3.0810.1 HASH, WILLIAM 105.31 69.75 35.56 11/21/2001 38.02 - none
34.3234.2 HATCH,GARY 68.45 33.16 35.29 11/20/2001 129.48 -
21.1904.1 HATCHER, LAVONNE 95.05 62.09 32.96 12/18/2001 31.73. none
46.0260.1 HAYES. MARCIA 64.74 35.61 29.13 11/21/2001 61.58 - none
69.0694.2 HEATON. CHAD & HEATHER 123.71 64.47 59.24 11/28/2001 146.91 -
2.5330.2 HEBERT, DAVID & BRENDA 207.42 146.56 60.74 .12 12/04/2001 167.00.
21.2262.1 HECOCK, JAMES 78.12 73.58 4.54 12/24/2001 30.00 - none
33.4246.1 HELFERICH, ROGER 65.28 35.62 29.66 11/19/2001 60.00 - none
31.0618.2 HENDERSON, BRENDA 82.64 53.36 29.28 12/07/2001 51.58 -
2.6830,1 HENSEN, JAMES & RENA 334.18 58.26 50.76 57.98 167.18 08/21/2001 223.16 - none
50.4028.2 HERNANDEZ. ANTHONY 57.92 55.73 2.19 12/24/2001 80.00 -
1.3260.1 HERSEY, RICHARD 344.65 224.93 119.72 12/17/2001 119.72 - none
1.3300.1 HERSEY, RICHARD 527.27 418.18 109.09 12/17/2001 190.27 . none
48.4101.1 HESS & MARTIN 596.16 596.16
3.0036.2 HESTER. CHRISTINE 102,31 68.26 34.05 12/19/2001 43.89 -
3.0094,2 HESTER, CHRISTINE A 202.31 141.03 61.28 12/19/2001 58.82 -
34.1966.1 HEYDEN,ROBERT 49.77 40.67 9.10 11/28/2001 10000 . none
31,3454.2 HICKMAN. JOHN & JENNIFER 140.90 97,83 43.07 12/19/2001 5000.
37.3814.1 HIGH DESERT 19.44 12.96 6.48
14.3568.1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTIO 42.24 35.76 6.48
14.3496.1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTlO 42.24 35.76 6.48
74.3110.2 HIGHT DESERT CONSTRUCTIO 139.31 84.99 54.32 11/28/2001 77.27 -
3,0382.1 HILL, BRIAN OR VICTORIA 157.42 104.22 53.20 12117/2001 71.65 - none
3 0268.1 HOBDEY, BRIAN 74.14 58.26 15.88 12/24/2001 10.00 - none
1.0920.1 HOFFMAN. JON C 190.96 31,24 36.94 45.55 77.23 09/25/2001 133.13. none
4.1792.2 HOHENSHEL T. JOAN 199.10 73.58 51.69 73.83 11/21/2001 149.81 -
46.0356.1 HOLDRIDGE, JOANNE 101.83 72.69 29.14 11/26/2001 32.83 - none
5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVia 143.24 90.17 53.07 12/19/2001 65.37 - none
32.1456.1 HOLLINGSHEAD. BRETT 94.05 47.11 46.94 12/04/2001 94.49 - none
19.0354.2 HOLLOWAY, JENNIFER & TAD 123.23 85.07 38.16 11/28/2001 36.94 -
22.2368.1 HOME BUILDERS 95.62 6.48 89.14 07/23/2001 26.38 -
20.1316.1 HOME BUILDERS 145.28 63.36 34.48 34.48 12.96
52.0415.1 HOME DEPOT #1804 15.35 1.62 3.24 10.49 12118/2001 3.24 - none
31.3458.1 HOPKINS, DARRYL 141.73 127.51 14.22 12/13/2001 55.00 - none
74.3966.1 HOSAC, JAMES 91.29 45.73 45.56 11/28/2001 109.31. none
4.0810.2 HOUST, DALE & JANICE 152.95 10315 49.80 11/21/2001 49.80 -
33.2652.1 HOWELL,KATHLEEN 94.03 52.17 41.86 11/15/2001 45.55 - none
65.0460.2 HUMPHREY, KELLY 102.78 59.69 43.09 11/20/2001 38.17 -
19.1166.2 HUNEMILLER. KELLY 88.62 58.26 30.36 11/26/2001 68.94.
15.0124.1 HUNT CONSTRUCTION 77.64 43.16 34.48 12/28/2001 34.48 -
31.3402.1 HUNT, HEATH 76.07 64.85 11.22 12/17/2001 5000 - none
15.0048.3 HUNTER, PAUL 145.75 91,66 49.24 4.85 12/06/2001 50.00 -
3.0306.2 HUNTLEY. JASON 85.71 69.75 15.96 01/16/2002 30.00-
46.0808.1 IBARRA, EDElIA C 64.63 36.99 27.64 11/26/2001 35.00 - none
3.4001.1 INTERSTATE BATTERY 355.06 29.16 325,90 05/30/2001 455.89 -
32.1148.1 IRWIN. DAVID 120.45 5094 69.51 11/26/2001 6828 - none
6.1932.1 IVERSON CONSTRUCTION 47.82 33.36 14.46 01/04/2002 .20.
... in Msg column indicates no Nolice is to be sent
f
.,
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page; 8
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :50am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum Amoun!Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pm!
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/3012001 Date Amount Msg
43.0120.1 IVERSON CONSTRUCTION INC 12.99 33.16 34.48 5.35 11/26/2001 34.48 -
65.3112.1 JACOBS, MARIE 102.52 60.92 41.60 1112912001 59.21 . none
50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 159.87 33.16 26.68 30.37 69.66 10/22/2001 39.00 - none
51.3570.3 JAKOVAC, DESIREE 82.68 44.51 38.17 12118/2001 38.17 -
32.1622.1 JENKINS. LELAND 84.05 49.71 34.34 1210312001 44.34 - none
35.0249.1 JOHN FLAHERTY CONSTRUCTI 19.44 12.96 6.48
42.2482.1 JOHNSON, BRYON & MARYLEN 68.57 36.84 31.73 12/18/2001 32.96 - none
32.0616.2 JOHNSON, CONNIE JO 138.05 59.71 78.34 12120/2001 100.00 -
42.3060.1 JOHNSON, MATHEW 77.33 35.61 41.72 11128/2001 73.00 - none
42.1196.1 JOHNSON, MICHAEL 39.70 39.44 .26 12118/2001 29.00. none
34.0390.2 JOHNSON, PETER 137.64 67.34 53.06 17.24 12/26/2001 109.00 -
7.0886.3 JOHNSON. ROGER & HOLLY 109.00 65.92 43.06 11/1412001 82.10 -
32.0906.1 JOHNSTON. THOMAS E 66.85 41.88 24.97 08109/2001 61.10 - none
34.1638.2 JONES,GENE 89.02 79.12 9.90 1212812001 24.58 -
50.2354.1 JONES. LARA 54.53 34.39 20.14 12/1812001 30.00 - none
22,1418.1 JONES. MICHELLE 81.27 68.26 13.01 12/19/2001 160.00 - none
4.1138.2 JONES, NATHAN & SARAH 99.19 61.02 38.17 11/06/2001 48.01 -
2.5390.1 JONES. SALLY 115.46 68.68 46.78 11/09/2001 35.71 - none
35.5029.2 JONES. TRUDY A. 99.09 54.63 44.46 12104/2001 40.77 .
32.0522.2 JUHASZ. DON C. 80.29 73.64 6.65 01/16/2002 100.00 -
50.3836.1 JULIAN. GEORGE 74.74 35.61 39.13 11/28/2001 60.35 - none
20.1932.1 JUSTICE, PAT 183.98 122.30 61.68 12/17/2001 78.90 - none
22.1408.1 KEATHLEY,CLARENCE 85.31 85.07 .24 12/31/2001 41.00. none
5.0270.2 KEEN. RYAN 114.72 65.92 48.80 11/16/2001 61.00 -
22.1172.1 KEMMISH, SUSAN J. 91.08 58.26 32.82 12106/2001 41.43 - none
32.0916.2 KENT, SHERI 7500 36.84 38.16 11/29/2001 54.15 -
22.1356.1 KERBS, MARVIN L. 176.12 112.95 63.17 12114/2001 93.92 - none
19.7164.4 KESSLER, SHELlA 217.90 53.36 34.48 44.48 85.58
74.3080.1 KIEHL. ANDREW & DENISE 73.79 43.28 30.51 11/09/2001 65.64 - none
42.25301 K1LER. KELLY & TAMMY 109.35 59.69 49.66 1211812001 5458 - none
4.1614.1 KINCAID. LAURA 160.17 73.58 86.59 12117/2001 120.00 - none
33.4348.1 KINGSTON, CHARLES 97.69 60..94 36.75 12121/2001 65.00 - none
21.2090.1 KINGSTON. CHRISTIE 176.45 141.03 35.42 12/21/2001 36.65 - none
3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 81.37 65.92 15.45 01/17/2002 50.00 - none
51.0466.1 KLINE. BEVERLY 59.84 33.16 26.68 01/0212002 75.00 - none
31.1270.2 KLINT, CARl. 150.99 104.22 46.77 11/1512001 143.60 -
74.3600 1 KOCH. CLINTON 45.67 45.73 .14 12/1212001 35.00 . none
21.0466,1 KORBER,GERALD 101.39 61.02 40.37 11/28/2001 73.02-
19.6642.1 KRENZ. ROY 135.67 69.75 34.19 31.73 11/19/2001 35.04 - none
21.1550.2 KROMMENHOEK, PAUL 117.75 73.58 44.17 11/19/2001 101 50-
50.4642,3 KUGEL, LISA 94.38 48.34 46.04 12117/2001 93.00.
50.0676.1 LACASA lAVILLA 554.11 551.59 2.52 12118/2001 418.04" none
50.0720.1 LACASA LAV1LLA 96.36 93.44 2.92 12/18/2001 67,52 - none
50.2404.3 LACASSE. BRIAN & SONYA 93.78 54.63 39.15 12114/2001 34.00 -
74.0426.1 LACY, GLORIA 38.89 33.16 5.73 11/29/2001 100.00 - none
50.1750.1 LACY, MEL 78.71 45.74 32.97 11/07/2001 77.94 - none
69,0532.1 LAFEVER FAMILY TRUST 325.46 3316 34.48 57.85 199.97 09/25/2001 272.54 - none
19.0010.1 LAFLAN. RANDY 118.05 65.92 52.13 11/2812001 172.45 . none
3.0654.1 LAMBERT, KENNETH 97.79 58.26 39.53 11/2012001 92.38 - none
22.1244.2 LAMPKIS. LISA 100.28 64.85 35.43 11/09/2001 46.50-
22.1842,1 LANDOW, BRUCE 119.45 82.51 36.94 12/19/2001 40.63 -
34.0784.1 LARA, RAFAEL 125.50 7241 53.09 11/28/2001 19314 - none
20.0206.2 LARGEVIN. MICHAEL & DARCIE 115.31 75.92 39.39 1211912001 46.52.
31.0866.1 LARSON-POOLE. VICKEE K 111.91 72.51 39.40 12105/2001 44.32 - none
21.1970.2 LAURENCE. PATRICK & ROBIN 99.33 64.85 34.48
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 9
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :51 am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDetinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
21.2824.1 LEACH. GLEN 87.39 58.26 29.13 11/21/2001 29.13 - none
46.0816.1 LEATHAM. JARED 81.31 45.74 35.57 12/18/2001 43.22 - none
20.1986.3 LEDO, CHRISTOPHER & GLAY 145.29 110.81 34.48
21.1522.2 LEE, DONALD 110.40 72.51 37.89 11/09/2001 89.01 .
43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 95.10 53.25 41.85 11/15/2001 39.39.
42.2736.1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 56.84 35.61 21.23 12/21/2001 35.00 . none
50.24281 LEONARD. DAMON 95.74 48.19 47.55 12/24/2001 65.00 - none
31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 159.09 53.36 41,60 30.37 33.76 09/26/2001 68.79 - none
65.0302.2 LEPPEK, MICHAEL 53.36 26.68 26.66 11/13/2001 27.91 -
34 2852.1 LEVELL, SUZANNE 81.70 38.22 43.48 11/29/2001 200.00 - none
15.0032.2 LEVERETT, RANDALL 106.68 69.75 36.93
31.3382.1 LEVITT, MONTE 167.12 88.90 34.19 44.03 11/28/2001 22.56 - none
72.0208.1 LEWIS, PHILLIP 69.66 36.84 32.82 11119/2001 77.10 - none
19.4464.1 LITTLE, CRAIG 113.78 72.51 41.27 11/27/2001 45.00.
4.1562.3 LONGSTREET,GARRET 87.52 53.36 34.16 11/14/2001 80.00 -
34.0814.1 LONGWORTH. ERIC 105.26 52.17 53.09 12/18/2001 46.78 - none
2.4270.1 LORD, LARRY R. 9004 53.36 36,68 11/2912001 65.11 - none
21.0474.1 LOUIE, NANCY 115.84 58.26 57.58 11/28/2001 184.74 - none
20.0132.1 LOVELAND, SHAWNA 103.95 84.00 19.95 12/17/2001 100.00 -
4.17902 LUCAS. TY & JACQUELINE 122.81 81.24 41.57 11/27/2001 52.64 -
21.26361 LUCERO, ROBERT & TRACY 120.09 79.75 40.34 12/19/2001 67.40. none
35.0237.2 LUCERO. RONALD & MALIA BO 59.84 33.16 26.68 11/20/2001 26.68.
14.5035.2 LUCHI, All SA 101.79 64.85 36.94 11/27/2001 44.48 -
2.0390.1 LUKE, DANIEL 105.62 72,51 33.11 12/18/2001 34.34 - none
2.4790.2 LUTZ, SHAUN & AMBER 103.12 62.09 40.36 .67 11/28/2001 111.00-
22.1724.1 MACHADO, DAVID 80.79 72.51 8.28 12118/2001 60.00 . none
42.1970 1 MACHULE,HERBERT 65.04 33.16 31.88 11/27/2001 52.79 - none
2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 103.42 61.02 42.40 11/28/2001 109.00 - none
19.03301 MAFFETT CONSTRUCTION 8510 57,19 27.91 11119/2001 27.91 - none
19.01002 MAISANO, ARLEEN 80.04 53.36 26.68 11126/2001 26.68 -
51.04861 MARCH, RICHARD 98.95 53.40 45.55 12/03/2001 45.55 - none
42.2332 1 MARIN, JOSE 127.66 63.37 64029 11/2812001 14142 - none
34.1472.1 MARKHAM, RON 107.56 60.91 46.65 11/28/2001 86.46 . none
65.0472.1 MARQUARDT. MICHAEL 39.01 33.16 5.85 12/18/2001 10.00. none
33.1850.1 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 95.26 57.10 38.16 12119/2001 32,23 - none
502176.1 MARTIN, JASON 201.16 161.76 39.40 11/21/2001 92.19 - none
42.12061 MARTIN. LOREN 93.68 48.05 45.63 11128/2001 60.00. none
35.1170.2 MARTINEZ. LUIS & VERONICA 76.37 39.44 36.93 12/04/2001 36.93 -
190266.2 MASON. MONTE 114.51 76.34 38.17 11/1312001 34.48 -
50.37042 MATA. FREDIE 8512 59.69 25.43 12/11/2001 60.00 -
51.0514.1 MATHEWS. DONNA 62.30 33.16 29.14 11126/2001 50.05 - none
51.4040 1 MATLOCK. JAMES 58.24 32.36 25.88 12/19/2001 25.88 - none
4.17501 MATSON. STUART 80.04 53.36 26.68 11/26/2001 26.68 . none
3.01281 MATTHEWS, BRENT & KIMBER 111.00 63.47 39.13 8.40 01/1012002 34.34 . none
504821.1 MAWS #3 - SPRINLKER 3.24 3.24 11/21/2001 42.12 -
33.2278.3 MAY. GEORGE & MELISSA 95.40 57.23 38.17 11114/2001 51.70 -
1 2050.1 MCBRIDE,D.B. 77.64 51.76 25.88 03/13/2001 225.87 - none
332266.1 MCBRIDE. KEVIN 123.74 99.08 24.66 12/19/2001 75.00. none
42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK. TODD & LEISA 116.71 64.60 52.11 12/18/2001 53.34 . none
74.0066.1 MCDANIEL. THOMAS & RAEL Y 75.30 38.22 37.08 11/2612001 40.77 - none
31.3474.1 MCDONALD. SHAWN 91.48 61.02 30.46 11126/2001 62.00 - none
2.2950.1 MCFADDAN. CRAIG 346.85 68.68 278.17 11/26/2001 49.65 - none
50.04002 MCFADDEN. CLEORA 6736 39.45 27.91 12/17/2001 59.12 -
1.00801 MCFADDEN. CLEORA 91.41 85.07 6.34 12127/2001 4000 - none
32.0230 1 MCFADDEN, LEONARD 138.50 73.64 64.86 11/28/2001 129.10. none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :51am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDeHnquenl Balance
Last Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11130/2001 10131/2001 09/3012001 Date Amount Msg
2.3660.1 MCFADDEN,LEONARD 103.08 74.74 28.34 11121/2001 54.71 - none
31 .3242.1 MCGOWAN. DAVID E 107.80 68.68 39.12 11126/2.001 12.0.99 . none
50.2.192..1 MCGREGOR. JASON 62.30 34.39 27.91 11/2012001 55.52 - none
31.0822.1 MCKAY, JOHN 94.13 61.02 33.11 11/26/2001 35.57 - none
34.1972.3 MCKEE, LESLIE 94.03 50.94 43.09
42.2252.1 MCKINLEY. BRAD L. 104.27 66.11 38.16 11114120D1 188.66 - none
74.2502 5 MCKINLEY, JUNE 92.78 53.39 39.39 11/2612001 36.93 -
50.2126.1 MCMAHAN, BRIAN 75.02 40.68 34.34 12/19/2001 45.57 . none
74.0092.1 MCNITT, GALE J 73.28 42.48 30.80 11129/2001 48.02 - none
50.2444.1 MCNITT. STEVE & TRACY 64.23 35.61 28.62 12/1812001 32.00 - none
20.1698.1 MEACHAM. MICHAEL L. 176.90 76.34 41.58 58.98 11/2812001 60.00 - none
16.3620.1 MEDALLION HOMES 37.91 26.68 11.23 11/0812001 52.76 -
16.3504.1 MEDALLION HOMES 112.12 43.16 34.48 34.48 11108/2001 40.66 -
1.2730.1 MELLEN, ANGELA 169.64 120.81 48.83 12/1912001 1.00 - none
21.2754.1 MELTON, GARY 136.22 10.00 49.23 76.99 1010912001 66.08 - none
35.7996.1 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DIS 19.44 12.96 6.48
52.1100.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 152.77 101.10 51.67 1110812001 101.10. none
52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 4,088.95 296.29 3.792.66 11108/2001 296.29 - none
51.3780.1 MERRITT, JUDY 53.97 33.16 20.81 12/24/2001 50.00 - none
20.0066.2 MEYER,BRADLEY 187.42 122.30 65.12 11 /0612001 214.81 -
74.3246.1 MEYER. JOHN & LISA 153.06 79,76 73.30 11/2812001 168.07 - none
21.20583 MEYER, ROBERT & CLAUDETT 108.22 72.51 35.71 11/29/2001 34.48 -
50.3848.1 MEYERS, DAN 74.87 5202 22..85 12/18/2001 50.00 - none
19.1708.2 MICHAS, JAMES 129.38 81.24 48.14 11/14/2001 126.66 -
74.0014.2 MIKE SWOPE 61.07 34.39 26.68 11/13/2001 26.68 -
74.3352.1 MILLER. DAVID E 80.08 48.34 31.74 11/0712001 35.43 - none
21.0054.2 MILLER, JIMMIE 12.5.86 84.00 41.86 1210312001 61.54 -
203004.1 MILLER. KENNETH 61.53 55.05 6.48
34.1964.2 MILLER. RICKEY 81.45 45.88 35.57 12/18/2001 38.03.
34.2044.1 MILLER, WILLIAM G. 71.33 38.22 33.11 11/21/2001 96.67 - none
32.1108.2 MILNER, BRIAN 10744 52.31 55.13 11/28/2001 118.41 -
1.2420.1 MIRONOV, BARBARA & OLEG 118.17 80.17 38.00 12/1212001 42.03 - none
21.2820.1 MOGEL, BRYAN 97.39 58.26 39.13 11128/2001 62.81 - none
33.4264.3 MOMA, MICHAEL 80.06 40.67 39.39 12117/2001 54.31 -
42.1836.3 MONROE, BUD 62.74 55.86 6.88 01/09/2002 35.00 -
4.0538.1 MONSON, THOMAS 87.39 5826 29.13 11/2612001 29.13 - none
42.1854.1 MONTGOMERY, ROBERT & RA 70.24 36.84 33.40 11/1512001 118.00 - none
74.3300.1 MOORE. DONALD L. 75.97 45.61 30.36 12124/2001 29.13 - none
460222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & USA 58.13 52.03 6.10 12/31/2001 40.00 " none
4.1634.1 MOORE, RUSSELL C 171.40 53.36 118.04 11/0512001 120.00 - none
21.3098.1 MORAN. RICHARD 116.24 69.75 46.49 11109/2001 81.35 - none
23.3002.2 MORELLO, G. & MAYA-LUSTRA 87.84 53.36 34.48
32.0806.2 MORGAN. CHARLES 209.33 62.43 72.61 67.69 6.60 11/14/2001 100.00 .
2.1290.3 MORGAN, DANIEL 178.72 108.82 69.90
2.4400.2 MORGAN, FRANK 97.82 64.85 32.97 11/28/2001 51.58 -
2.5630.1 MORRISON. DWAYNE 165.11 91.66 73.45 12/13/2001 200.00 - none
21.1824.1 MORTON, PATRICIA 185.91 122.30 63.61 11/1312001 6361 - none
22.1602.2 MOUNCE, ROBERT 143.61 92.73 50.88 11/2712001 124.76.
34.0500 1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 99.09 5846 40.63 12119/2001 66.46 . none
65.0384.1 MUCK, JIM 73.63 40.67 32.96 12103/2001 34.19 - none
7432161 MUIR, GRANT 100.58 41.90 58.68 12/18/2001 75.90 - none
4.1574.2 MULLINS, ROBERT 124.47 85.07 39.40 12103/2001 39.40.
34.16861 MURPHY, JACK 63.89 3822 25.67 01104/2002 60.00 - none
51.04821 MURRAY. SONORA MURRAY 56.70 56.00 .70 12/2112001 80.00 - none
50.0262.1 MURRI. SCOTT 62.44 33.16 29.28 11/26/2001 48.48 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
"
I
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page 11
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :52am
Current PeriOd: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pm!
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
4.0852.1 MYER,SETH 123.40 80.17 43.23 11/21/2001 42.00 - none
51.3310.1 NASH. EDWARD & RUDGE, CY 58.24 32.36 25.88 11/07/2001 25.86 - none
42.3088.2 NASH, TIM & JOCELYN 66.13 38.22 27.91 12/12/2001 29.14 -
69.0770.2 NAST,GARY 61.16 26.68 34.48 11/21/2001 54.16 -
4.1876.2 NEEDS,KATHY 228.59 164.43 6416 12/03/2001 163.37 -
69.0788.1 NEELY. JAMES & PHYLLIS 130.66 64.15 66.51 11/26/2001 99.19 - none
1.2000.1 NESBIT, RICHARD & BARBARA 95.22 57.19 36.03 11/19/2001 33.11 . none
50.1228.1 NGUYEN. HUONG 41.44 41.44 11/06/2001 53.74 - none
46.0242.1 NOYES, DAVID 54.48 45.73 8.75 01/16/2002 31.73 - none
50.21521 OLMEDA, ANGEL & ELL Y 75.02 47.11 27.91 11105/2001 27.91 - none
69.1306.1 OLMSTEAD. DANIEL 78.50 36.79 41.71 12/04/2001 67.54 - none
4.0914.1 OLSEN, H. DEAN 102.57 69.75 32.82 11/26/2001 41.59 - none
74.3150.2 OLSON, RICHARD & CINDIE 159.94 110043 49.51 12/19/2001 75.00 -
74.0412.3 OSKOLKOFF. JOSLIN 67.64 33.16 34.48
74.2436.1 OSMAN, KATHLEEN 64.71 33.16 31.55 11/15/2001 35.00 . none
50.1918.1 OSTERHOUT. JUSTIN 75.23 36.84 38.39 12/18/2001 40.00 - none
13.2094.2 OVERY,ROBBY 200.49 64.85 41.72 51.56 42.36 12/21/2001 61.72 -
50.3898.1 OWEN, KEVIN 75.10 39.45 35.65 12/17/2001 47.00 - none
74.3286.1 OWENS. GLENN & VICKIE 116.99 67.34 49.65 11/29/2001 50.88 - none
33.2320.2 OZUNA, MARIO 147.05 33.16 53.91 58.83 1.15 01/17/2002 50.00 -
22.0454.1 P. JANSSON, JANIE 177.56 114.22 63.34 12/19/2001 55.80 - none
19.0576.1 PACIFIC DESIGN 54.95 48.47 6.48
21.2230.1 PAGE, LINDA 87.39 58.26 29.13 12/1712001 29.13. none
34.0730.1 PAKISH. DONNA 47.37 46.97 .40 12/1912001 26.28 - none
31.3280.1 PALMER. PAT 233.00 122.30 80.58 30.12 12/12/2001 120.00 - none
15.0043.2 PALMER, TROY 150.07 106.98 43.09 11/19/2001 44.32 -
74.3320.1 PARKINSON. VIDA 35.76 33.16 2.60 01/15/2002 26.68 . none
33.2762.1 PATTERSON. DAVID 99.07 52.02 4705 11/2712001 50.74. none
2.2490.2 PATTERSON, DEENA L 36.36 36.38 05/1712001 52.76 -
510318.3 PAULIN. BEN 59.84 33.18 26.68 12/18/2001 26.68 -
74.3356" 1 PAYNE,STEPHEN 88.% 46.96 41.99 12/04/2001 46.91 - none
51.0746.3 PERKINS, CHARLES 119.05 33.16 26.68 26.68 32.53 09/06/2001 33.76 -
69.0214.1 PERRY, DAN & LORI 100.32 53.12 47.20 12/18/2001 10 1 .48 - none
4" 1326.2 PERRY, JARED & MICHELLE 62.55 61.02 1.53 12/0512001 61.67 -
22.1430.2 PETERSON. ERIC 184.37 131.03 53.34 12/12/2001 51.88 -
15.0024.2 PETTIER. SEAN 129.61 39.53 90.08 05/0112001 40.25 -
423006.1 PHILLIPS. DANA 64.74 35.61 29.13 12/18/2001 35.28 . none
42.1842.1 PHILLIPS, JAMES 71.07 33.16 37.91 11/28/2001 60043 . none
6.1812.1 PHILLIPS. ROBERT 101.66 72.06 29.60 12/05/2001 36.98 -
74.4101.1 PIC 24.30 9.72 14.58 11/1312001 92.34 -
74.4103.1 PIC 424.44 14.58 409.86 11/1312001 218.70 -
15.0036.2 PIERCE, CHUCK SR. & MARY 117.18 116.78 040 01103/2002 56.52-
31.3310.2 PIERCE, VELVET 69.50 68.68 .82 11/29/2001 55.00 -
1.0316.1 PIPCO LLC 313.84 62.89 62.89 188.06 08/01/2001 106.04 -
34.1220.1 PIPER. GLENN 59.84 33.16 26.68 11/0912001 54.29 . none
32.1590.1 PISCHEL. DEBORAH 105.08 61.06 44.02 12/2712001 40.00 - none
32.0900.1 PITMAN. DOUGLAS 150.05 33.16 52.28 6.48 58.13 10112/2001 120.86 - none
19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 107.39 68.26 39.13 12/19/2001 29.13 - none
340832.2 PLETCHER, MICHAEL 77.62 39.45 38.17 12/18/2001 41.86 -
22.1344.1 PLOTT. JOHN 98.90 88.90 10.00 12/12/2001 82.02 . none
2.3340.1 POE. RICHARD 116.67 90.17 26.50 12/1912001 78.00 - none
3 0852.1 POFFENBERGER, EUGENE & E 140.47 92.73 47.74 1112812001 80.19 - none
2.4100.2 POND, JUSTIN & LISA 64.87 33.76 31.11 10116/2001 83.42 .
2.4090.2 POND, JUSTIN & LISA 50.64 33.76 16.88 10116/2001 33.76 -
2040802 POND. JUSTIN & LISA 64.59 45.25 19.34 10/16/2001 36.22 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be senl
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :52am
Current Period: 01/3112002
No Delinquent Minjmum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
21.1942.1 POOL, JAMES H. 161.90 68.26 35.28 58.36 01/15/2002 25.00 . none
69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 110.16 75.82 34.34 11/26/2001 63.86 - none
2.0460.1 POTTER, MICHAEL & CONNIE 82.50 53.36 29.14 12/03/2001 55.13 - none
34.3254.2 POULSEN. BRIAN 53.89 35.62 18.27 10117/2001 121.64 -
50.2402.1 POWELL. RANDY 116.87 65.98 50.89 01/02/2002 53.63 . none
31.1010.1 PRADO. RIGOBERTO 72.68 62.09 10.59 1211312001 39.25 - none
31.0798.1 PRICE. JOHN W. 106.59 74.85 31.74 12119/2001 44.00 - none
51.3102.2 PRICE, REBECCA 68.36 3605 32.31 1210312001 36.00 -
64.0052.1 PRICHARD CONSTRUCTION 77.64 33.16 44.48 12103/2001 68.66.
35.2404.1 PRICHARD CONSTRUCTION 19.44 12.96 6.48
1.3490.3 PRIEST, DONNA 132.29 91.66 40.63 12/14/2001 39.40 -
21.1828.2 PRINTZ. DENIA 146.73 104.22 34.05 8.46 11/06/2001 160.00 .
4.2248.2 PUCKETT, RUSSELL 152.00 100.39 51.61 12/18/2001 75.00 -
34.1172.1 QUARNBERG,CARL&DOROT 124.53 72.41 52.12 12119/2001 57.48 - none
21 .1658.1 R & M HOMES 73.94 69.75 4.19 11/28/2001 30.00 - none
13.4038.1 RADY CONSTRUCTION 125.08 43.16 34.48 34.48 12.96
19.0220.1 RADY, CARl 97.84 63.36 34 .48 12/20/2001 45.71 - none
52.1002.1 RAFANELLl & NAHAS 973.56 364.55 462.50 146.51 12128/2001 462.50 . none
52.1006.1 RAFANELLI & NAHAS 145.95 64.51 81.15 .29 1212812001 81.15 - none
7.2000.2 RALPHS,PAUL 135.53 85.07 50.46 12/26/2001 107.54 -
40.0100.1 RAMBO,DEBORA 76.67 36.99 39.68 12/05/2001 39.68 - none
22.1826.1 RANDY JONES 120.77 81.24 39.53 11/1512001 57.98 -
2.5670.1 RANSOM, JAMES R 138.51 97.83 40.68 12120/2001 40.00 - none
31.3532.3 RASH, LARRY & VIOLET t 29.83 91.66 38.17 11/2112001 74.81 -
35.0032.2 RASUSSEN, DANIEL 75.16 36.99 38.17 11/26/2001 47.68 -
5.0194.1 RATZBURG, CHARLES 134.58 92.73 41.85 11/26/2001 146.22 . none
42.1884.3 RECORD, CLAYTON & SUSAN 77.62 40.68 36.94 11/16/2001 3571 -
35.0050.2 REDD, STEPHEN & JOAN 78.56 44.36 34.20 11/26/2001 32.97 -
2.2580.1 REED. DEBORAH 57.21 57.19 .02 01/11/2002 55.00 - none
50.2390.2 REED, LORETTA 156.26 90.05 66.21 12/19/2001 74.82-
42.1916.3 REGENNITTER, CONNIE 70.61 64.75 5.86 12/06/2001 100.00 "
31.3390.2 REIF. JANELLE & HULL, JASON 73.81 7251 1.30 01/0412002 20.00 -
4.0542.2 RES, SHAWN 143.33 96.56 46.77 11/0912001 5046.
20.1394.2 REZENDES, TROY 131.13 131.03 .10 01/17/2002 63.50 -
32.1694.1 RICE. E. DONALD 87.07 43.28 43.79 12/18/2001 70.00 - none
74.3690.2 RICE, THOMAS & SAMANTHA 76.39 3945 36.94 12/18/2001 43.09 -
34.16062 RIGENHAGEN, FRANKLIN 88.85 46.99 41.86 12131/2001 65.83 -
34.0786.3 RILEY, MARK 95.40 57.23 38.17 1211212001 3.24 -
5.0454.2 RILEY, R SHANE 239.39 172.09 67.30 11/1912001 7345-
42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 84.98 50.65 34.33 11109/2001 164.23. none
32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 98.81 49.56 49.25 11/2812001 115.03 -
51.3300.1 ROBERTS. DAVID 73.53 33.16 40.37 1211212001 39,96 - none
21.3080.1 ROBERTS, JAY 375.78 53.36 117.70 204.72 01/10/2002 26.68 - none
34.1034.1 R08INSON. KENNETH 114.27 67.35 46.92 11/2612001 147.66. none
74.32101 ROBINSON, LONNIE 71.03 41.90 29.13 1211612001 35.28 - none
50.0156.1 RON SMITH CONSTRUCTION 52.18 33.16 19.02 11/30/2001 7000 -
14.4466.1 ROPER, JACK & LAURY 77.46 77.41 .05 12/17/2001 34.00 -
21.2006.1 ROSE, MARK & TAMARA 112.09 80.17 31.92 12118/2001 40.00 . none
2.1000.1 ROTT, PHILLIP 5733 57.19 .14 12128/2001 30.37 - none
74.04181 ROWELL. LEE 6745 86.36 1.09 01/15/2002 4952 - none
35.0056.2 ROWETT, 80B & DANA 79.78 46.96 32.82 11/19/2001 61.57 -
3.0800.3 ROWLEY, RICHARD 99.05 57.19 4U6 1211212001 34.48 -
52.16441 ROY ENTERPRISES LLC 262.91 134.00 126.91 11/28/2001 287.99 - none
19.7374.1 RUBALCAVA,ROLANDO 8739 58.26 29.13 11128/2001 29.13 - none
4.2110.2 RUSSELL, ROGER 81.99 81.99 08/0712001 45.15-
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 13
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :53am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmounlDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Dale Amount Msg
74.3432.2 SAGER, LEE & NADEAN 198.22 150.49 47.73 11/2812001 51.42 -
2.2100.1 SALMAN, CHRISTOPHER L 127.62 84.00 39.54 4.08 1112712001 100.00 - none
15.0058.2 SANCHEZ, CURTIS & DEBRA 137.49 84.00 53.49 11/16/2001 2757 -
16.3642.1 SAWTOOTH HOMES INC 43.42 40,96 2.46 01/08/2002 6.48-
19.6652,2 SCHELENE, VERNA 81.36 58.26 23.10 11/26/2001 30.00.
74.0382.2 SCHILDHAUER, YOULANDA 96.49 49.56 46.93 11/28/2001 140,80.
74.3170.2 SCHNEIDERMAN, MATTHEW 79.92 46.96 32.96 12118/2001 34.19 -
20.0434.1 SCHNUR, CRAIG 173.70 146.35 27.35 12114/2001 48.00 -
42.3050.1 SCHOLZ, LESLIE 84.23 48.19 36.04 12113/2001 50.00 - none
34.1764.2 SCHOMBURG, PATRICK 106.52 43.16 26.68 36.68 10/25/2001 120.41 -
21.1870.1 SCHOPPELREY, DOUGLAS & C 101.62 96.56 5.06 01/15/2002 69.05 - none
13.1030.1 SCHROEDER ENTERPRISES, I 39.64 33.16 6.48
32.0622.4 SCHUSTER, BILL & LESLIE 90.72 50,79 39.93 12103/2001 45,00 -
3.0042.1 SCHWEND, LUVMINDA 138.91 94.00 40.63 4.28 12119/2001 50.00 - none
22.1636.4 SCOTT, CHUCK & TIFFANY 95.78 58.26 36.93 .59 1211212001 35.00 -
5.0414.3 SCOTT, EDWIN & KATHY 107.94 72.51 35.43 11/08/2001 145.75 -
4.2294.3 SCOTT, STEVEN & LORI 135.95 96.56 39.39 12113/2001 51.55 -
42.2724.3 SCUDDER, LES 67.64 33.16 34.48
3.0677.1 SECOASSOCIATES INC 9.72 4.86 4.86 10/10/2001 9 72 - none
69.2262,1 SEDILLO, JOE 352.63 57,32 274,24 21.07 01/16/2002 100.00 - none
43.0152.2 SESEK,KAREN 35.91 35.61 ,3D 1211212001 36.93.
21.2904.1 SEVIERI, MIKE 87.39 58.26 29.13 11/07/2001 35.28 - none
50.2420.2 SHAW. ROBERT 113.53 62.14 51.39 11/28/2001 58.03 -
74.0322.2 SHELDON, PAM 70.4 7 46.99 23.48 12/27/2001 30.00 -
42.2526.1 SHEL TROWN, ROGER 106,33 65.71 40.62 12126/2001 50.46 - none
2.2180.1 SHEPARD, DUWAIN 146.45 98.90 47.55 12/19/2001 50.00. none
74.3960.1 SHERARO, BILL 84.87 52.02 32.85 12/18/2001 30.00 - none
22.1552.1 SHIREMAN. WENDY 100.23 69.75 30.48 01/03/2002 10 00 - none
50.0292.1 SHOEMAKER, TAMI 11141 67.35 44.06 11/19/2001 55.75 - none
19.0776.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 39.64 33.16 6.48
3.0292.1 SHURTZ, ROD 176.95 161,67 15.28 01102/2002 55.00 - none
21.0208,1 SILSBY, TERRY 160,85 104,22 56.63 11/28/2001 126,26 - none
69.1292.3 SIMMONS, BRETT 118.63 90.72 27.91 12/03/2001 40.21.
31.3028.2 SIMS. JERRY & MICHELLE 175.51 129.96 45.55 11/13/2001 42.39 -
21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 174.65 126.78 47.87 12/1912001 36.68 -
31.0778.1 SIRANI. JOSEPH A 165.53 114.64 50.89 11/1512001 123.73 - none
7.0906.4 SMALL, DENNIS 105.31 65.92 39.39 11/06/2001 47.29 -
2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 12340 76.34 47.06 12/17/2001 45.83 - none
31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 111.93 71.02 40.91 12/19/2001 44.60 - none
51 .0498.1 SMITH. KARL 79.28 46.12 33.16 11/14/2001 73.24 . none
74.3176.2 SMITH, LANCE & TAMARA 42745 35.61 49.53 39.53 302.78 07/1812001 6694 -
50.0152.2 SMITH, RON 65.97 35.61 30.36 11/26/2001 3159 -
50.0154,3 SMITH, RON 59.84 33.16 26,68 12/17/2001 26.68 -
51.3090.3 SOLTAU, CYRIL 66.73 30.99 24.51 1123 12/24/2001 24.51 .
32.1576.1 SON, SHELUE 76.94 36.99 27.91 12.04 1210512001 30.00 - none
33.2646.1 SONDERMAN, MARTIN 169.23 125.05 44.18 11/16/2001 4049 - none
213164.1 SOWER, MICHAEL 112.49 73,58 38.91 12117/2001 66.00 - none
2.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 110.22 84.00 26.22 01/08/2002 65.00 - none
42.1994.1 SPEER,GEORGE 82.38 48.19 34.19 1112612001 39.11 . none
31.08R1 SPELLMAN, EDWARD E. 115.74 76.34 39.40 1211812001 45.55 . none
69.1190.1 SPENCER, DARRELL 172.16 41.58 39.38 91.20 1012512001 28484 - none
20.2999.1 SPRINKLER - BRENDA ESTATE 143.12 143.12
74.24284 SPRONG, RICHARD 8731 44.51 42.80 12/24/2001 50.00 -
56.0004.1 ST. LUKES REGIONAL MEDICA 8.43656 2.923,76 5.219.22 29358 12/1812001 5,219.22 - none
74.1118.1 STAHL, VIRGINIA 88.87 35.88 25,88 27.11 11/02/2001 29.07. none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 14
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :53am
Current Period: 01/31/2002
No Deflnquent Minimum AmounlDelinquent Balance
last Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non.Delinq 11130/2001 10/31/2001 09/3012001 Dale Amount Msg
2.4520.2 STEBBINS. JODIE 139.35 95.49 43.86 12/18/2001 52.00 -
40.0292.2 STEITZ. WllLENE 67.64 33.16 34.48
34.3186.2 STEWART, JESSIE 73.35 35.61 37.74 11/1512001 43.87.
33.3566.1 STILES, RANI C. 116.73 81.30 35.43 12/06/2001 30.64 . none
42.3056.3 STINAR, ILENE 76.39 40.68 35.71 12/05/2001 37.50 -
210152.2 STODDARD. NORMAN 152.50 100.39 52.11 12118/2001 58.26-
14.34561 STONE. JEREMIAH 144.12 85.07 45.54 7.03 6.48
32.0664.1 SUITER. JOHN W. 71.33 38.22 3311 12/03/2001 49.10 . none
21.1130.2 SULlIVAN. KATHY 181.09 69.75 57.84 53.50 12/17/2001 100.00.
31.3468.2 SUTTON Ill. DONALD 117.05 76.34 40.71 1010912001 98.88 -
32.1896.1 SWEET. DAN & CELESTE 46.49 4606 .43 01116/2002 33.00 - none
2.1670.1 SWENSON. MILDRED 77.64 51.76 25.88 11126/2001 25.86 . none
74.0020.2 SWOPE. MIKE 59.84 33.16 26.68 11113/2001 26.68 -
74.0018.2 SWOPE. MIKE 72.56 42.05 30.51 11/1312001 56.34.
2.4960.1 TATMAN. CHRISTY 112.50 100.39 12.11 01115/2002 50.00 . none
3.0418.1 TEAGUE. RON & JANET 28.10 28.10 11115/2001 27.91 - none
50.1020.1 TEeO INVESTMENTS 58.94 33.16 25.78 12/18/2001 25.00 " none
31.2314.2 TEIXEIRA. MICHELLE 80.04 53.36 26.68 11/26/2001 26.68.
33.0056.1 TEL.CAR INC. 599.72 124.83 109.88 365.Q1 1012412001 322.22 - none
2.1190.1 TERRELL. A 114.65 76.34 38.31 11/0812001 365.49 . none
34.0432.1 TERRIQUEZ. FRANCISCO MAG 156.81 110.45 46.36 1211912001 61.28 - none
34.1826.1 THAMES, DAVID & SUSANNE 42.73 42.05 .68 01/17/2002 42.14 - none
32.1654.1 THIELE. STEPHEN 129.16 80m 49.09 12/1412001 45,00 - none
42.2470.2 THOMPSON. BRENT 97.34 73.92 23.42 1212412001 39.40 -
21.2704.2 THOMPSON. ORVILLE 105.17 73.58 31.59 1211412001 46.35.
1.1950.1 THORNE, TORY 455.54 327.92 127.62 12/19/2001 12639 . none
1.1940.1 THORNE. TORY L 298.82 214.69 84.13 1211912001 79.21 - none
21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 12L86 81.24 40.62 1211812001 55 24 -
19.4458.4 THURBER, RICK 97.84 53.36 44.48 1112912001 5859 -
2.4800.1 TODD. JUDY L. 133.08 61.85 3283 38.40 1212412001 50.00. none
2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 81.27 53.36 27.91 1211712001 35.29 -
74.2520.1 TOLAND. DAVID 69.80 40.67 29.13 1112912001 163.15 - none
34.1902.2 TOLBOE, ANDREW 6764 33.16 34.48
40.0250.1 TOMICH, LONNY 77.48 44.51 32.97 12117/2001 30 04 - none
74.2620.1 TORRES. PABLO 72.54 35.61 36.93 1111312001 187.88 - none
32.1660.1 TRAIL, KARl 112.90 33.16 26.66 26.68 26.38 09/1212001 28.84 - none
254524.1 TUSCANY HOMES 39.64 33.16 648
25.4528 1 TUSCANY HOMES 39.64 33.16 6.48
25.4050.1 TUSCANY HOMES n39 53.36 17.55 6.48
25.4068.1 TUSCANY HOMES INC. 3964 33.16 6.48
254042.1 TUSCANY HOMES INC. 39.64 33.16 6.48
25.4010.1 TUSCANY HOMES INC 39.64 33.16 6.48
2540561 TUSCANY HOMES.INC 54.96 4848 648
42.2348.3 TUTTLE, TAMI 7U4 35.61 39.13 12103/2001 115.70 -
21.1174.1 TWADDLE. DAVID 144.56 96.56 48.00 0110212002 50.46 - none
2.2714.1 TWEDE. ROGER 87.42 53.36 34.06 11/07/2001 59.89 - none
34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 11478 57.23 4311 14.44 11/28/2001 50.00 - none
50.4522.1 UGARRIZA. SHELBY 39.30 35.61 3B9 01/1012002 29.13 - none
74.28761 USSERY. TRACY 144.63 83.63 61.00 1212412001 58.54 - none
42.1204.2 UTZ, ARRON 75.16 39.45 35.71 1112112001 1724 -
51.29961 VALLA. CAROLYN 8931 89.31 07111/2000 24.08 - none
42.3968.1 VANHOUTEN. MIKE 65.97 36.84 29.13 12/18/2001 36.51 . none
21.1 032. 1 VELADA. FEDERICO 100.54 69.75 30.79 01102/2002 5100 - none
20466.1 VICK, WILLIAM & KELLY 132.15 84.00 48.15 12/18/2001 56.76 - none
2.1860.3 VICTORY, CHRISTOPHER 163.42 69.75 83.67 10.00 1111512001 107.93 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 15
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22,2002 11 :54am
Current Period: 01131 f2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeJinq 11/30/2001 10131/2001 09/30/2001 Oate Amount Msg
34.1658.2 VJDEEN, STEVEN & ELIZABETH 60.13 48.34 11.79 12/24/2001 26.38 -
6.1991.1 VIENNA WOODS HOA - SPRJNK 48.06 41.58 6.48 12119/2001 12.63 -
5.0696.1 VIGIL. THOMAS 463.28 463.28 11103/2000 88.34 - none
21.0080.1 VINCENT. SPARKY 103.54 68.26 35.28 12/19/2001 39.13 - none
7.1052.1 VINEYARD, JAMES 112.76 6.48 106.28 07118/2001 67.52 - none
42.0324.1 VIVES, MARK 88.20 46,96 41.24 12/18/2001 50.00 - none
50 3742.2 VNUK. JOHN 218.41 57.23 83.60 77.58 12119/2001 50.00 -
51.3094.2 VNUK, JOHN 107.47 66.55 40.92 12124/2001 75.11 -
46.0262.1 VNUK, JOHN J 91.15 46.96 44.19 11128/2001 85.39 - none
22.0318.1 VOORHEES. MICHAEL 119.96 58.26 29.13 32.57 11/26/2001 45.00 - none
21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 118.03 77.41 40.62 11/19/2001 87.02 - none
1.2310.2 WALKER. BETTE 160.29 108.05 52.24 12/19/2001 60.00 -
31.0608.1 WALKER. MICHAEL 134.89 95.49 39.40 12/18/2001 41.86 - none
34.2734.1 WALL, MIKE 59.84 33.16 26.68 11/28/2001 26.68 - none
33.3682.1 WALLACE, CRYSTAL 66.96 39.45 29.14 .37 1211212001 30.00 - none
32.1306.2 WALSH. DAVID & CARA 76.60 44.50 32.10 12/19f2001 33.82-
1.3340,1 WALSH, RON 136.52 136.52 01/1612002 29.17 - "'none
22.1156.4 WARE, JAIMEE 122.98 80.17 42.81 12117/2001 73.56 -
32.0444.1 WARNER, MICHAEL & CYNTHIA 146.02 68.58 59.78 17.66 12118/2001 100.00 - none
19.4470.2 WATLINGTON, JUSTIN 88.62 58.26 30.36 11/08/2001 62,81 -
31.3388.1 WATSON, COREY S 97.34 72.51 24.83 12119f2001 50,00 - none
74.3052.1 WATSON. JASON 146.39 81.17 41.85 23,37 12124/2001 41.85 - none
312230.1 WATTERS, TAMI 135.55 98.90 36.65 12119f2001 37.04 - none
69.0446.1 WATTS, DARIK 91.41 48.19 43.22 12/1412001 49.37 - none
20.0476.1 WAYNE & SANDY HOOVER 39.64 33.16 6.48
30100 1 WEATHERMON. TINA 116.66 81.24 35.42 11/29/2001 32.96 - none
2.6080.1 WEBB, GERALD 82.75 58.26 24.49 11129f200 1 35.00 - none
212712.5 WEBBENHORST, JEO 111.99 58.26 53.73
33.4266.1 WEEK. NORMAN 107.03 58.46 48.57 11/16f2001 49.80 - none
21.1968,5 WELDIN, TAMMY 95.22 53.36 4186 11f08/2001 80.96.
31.3332.1 WENTZ, DANIEL R 92.50 53.36 39.14 11 f281200 1 97.34 - none
51.1168.1 WES WORCESTER 57.12 23.36 16.88 16.88 10/22/2001 33.76 -
51.1134.1 WES WORCESTER 37.98 4.22 16.88 16.88 12104/2000 12.96 -
74.3590,1 WEST, CHRISTEN 64.74 35.61 29.13 11/26/2001 3159 - none
22.04741 WEST, ROBERT A 104.27 104.22 ,05 0110212002 6852 - none
6.9700.1 WESTROCK HOMES 29.84 23.36 6.48
6.9818.1 WESTROCK HOMES 29.84 23.36 6.48
35.0247.1 WESTROCK HOMES 67.64 33.16 34.48 11f20/2001 68.66 -
150270.1 WESTROCK HOMES INC. 8784 53.36 34.48 11/20f2001 12.96-
22.23741 WESTROCK HOMES INC 87.42 53.36 34.06 11/2012001 5306 -
6.1928.1 WESTROCK HOMES, INC. 40.24 33.76 6.48 11f20/2001 6,48-
37.3810.1 WESTROCK HOMES, INC. 22.04 15.56 648
740108.1 WEWERS. MIKE 59.84 33.16 26.68 11/19/2001 26.68 - none
50.3890.1 WHIPPLE, JEFF 64.18 33.16 31.02 11/20f2001 30.00 - none
32.1404.1 WHITE, ALAN & SHARON 115.64 64.61 51.03 12112/2001 52,26 - none
21370.1 WHITE. DEBRA LYNN 102.22 80.17 22.05 12112/2001 60.00 - none
4.0922.1 WHITING. BRENT & LYNETTE 133.07 88.90 44.17 12113f2001 4171-none
15.0522.2 WILCOX, WILLIAM & BRANDI 59.60 58.26 1.34 12/2412001 40.62-
69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 100,45 48.28 5211 .06 12118/2001 74.25 - none
320618.2 WILKERSON, JASON 98.00 59.83 38.17 12f17/2001 3817 -
51.0838 3 WJLKINS. CORBIT 85.54 46.01 39.53 11108/2001 48.4 7 -
35.11602 WILLIAMS, TERRY 61.07 34.39 2668 11/26f2001 10682-
32.1252.2 WILLIAMSON. DALE 64.64 42.05 22.59 12114f2001 50.00 -
2.4310.1 WILSON. DENNIS K 80.04 53.36 26,68 11f26/2001 30.37 - none
50 2302.1 WINTERTON. DARIN 68.59 38,22 30.37 11 f26f200 1 70.28 - none
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 16
Standard Payment Customers Jan 22.2002 11 :54am
Cu rrent Period: 01/31/2002
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2001 10/31/2001 09/30/2001 Date Amount Msg
1.2010.1 WISDOM, RICK S 120.54 68.68 51.86 11/28/2001 133.85 - none
33.2358.2 WOLIN, DALE & LOIS 453.48 60.92 152.70 239.86 01/18/2002 45.83 -
2.5020.1 WOOD, KENNETH 147.47 95.49 51.98 11/14/2001 128.26 - none
74.0954.1 WOOD, PHILLIP 275.86 154.70 121.16 11/14/2001 121.16 - none
31.3344.1 WOODRUFF. NOEL R 140.56 93.80 46.76 11/27/2001 128.14 . none
22.1518.1 WOOSLEY, JAMES 147.74 123.37 24.37 01/17/2002 25.00 - none
35,1018.2 WRIGHT. RANDALL & KIRSTEN 81.45 46.97 34.48 11/21/2001 69.89.
4.1254.2 WURT, JENNIFER 154.68 104.22 50.46 11/16/2001 59.23 -
50.2426.1 WYATT, SAMUAL 49.13 45.60 3.53 10/29/2001 62.13 - none
19.7400.1 YAGER. WILLIAM 67.15 65.92 1.23 01/08/2002 31.59 - none
2.0424.1 YOUNG, BRADLEY & SHERRY 96.25 57.19 39.06 11/06/2001 123.00 - none
7.1072.1 YOUNG, MIKE & ROBIN 128.04 87.83 40.21 12/07/2001 11.88 -
31.3248.2 YOUNG,REBECCA 119.19 71002 48.17 12/20/2001 53.09 -
50.2338.2 YOUNGER, RUSSELL 67.64 33.16 34.48 11/21/2001 39.40 -
50.3784.1 ZAVALA JOSE 68.94 34.39 27.91 6.64 11/19/2001 50.00 . none
51.3110.2 ZEIMER, DALLENE 79.27 42.48 32.31 4.48 01/04/2002 30.00 -
20.1508.1 ZELLER, COR I 151.13 104.22 46.91 12/18/2001 43.22 - none
68.0122.2 ZIMMER, TIM & TAMMY 56.30 26.68 29.62 11/05/2001 94.43 -
46.0446.1 ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAM 42.35 42.05 .30 01/04/2002 34.34 - none
Grand Totals: 112,567.78 59.018.84 39.04054 5,718.12 8.790.28
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Cuslomer.Cust No '" {<I 9900000
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
u.
u.
0
I-
;::l
:J:
If)
...J
<C
;::l
I-
()
<C
...J
C3
Z
;::l
0
()
0
l-
I-
Z
w
?:
u.
u.
0
I-
;::l
:J:
If)
...J
<C
;::l
I-
()
<C
...J
C3
Z
;::l
0
()
0
l-
I-
z
w
?:
u..
u.
0
I-
;::l
:J:
If)
...J
<C
;::l
I-
()
<C
...J
()
Z
;::l
0
()
0 I'- t') 0 I'- I'- '<t 00 I'- 0 00 '<t
I- '<t l!) l!) I'- 0) l!) N '<t 00 0) 0
I- ~- ~ 00 I'- 00 00 00 N l!) l!) 00
Z 'II:
W
?:
lL
u..
:J: 0:: 0
I- 0:: 0::
Z >- W Z
0 0:: W W >- 0:: .!:. .!:. m CC
:E w ID ID 0:: <C ::a: 0 I- :E :J
m :E :E <C ;::l :J: ~ N If) W ...J I-
0 W W ;::l 0:: () ...J W W >- ;::l I- ~ 0
I- > () Z ID 0:: 1:2 >- z Z ...J (,!) 0.. Z
t ~ () 0 w <C w <C 0- <C ;::l ;::l :J ;::l W 0
~ ~ 0 Z C .., u.. :E <C :E .., .., .., <C €I) I-
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288.250]
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211' Fax 887.1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888.6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN) IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Special Workshop at SpurWing Country Club, 6800 North SpurWing
Way, Meridian, Idaho, on Friday, January 18th, 2002 at 7:30 am. The Meridian
City Council will be discussing procedures and process for strategic planning as
well as missions, visions, goals, objectives, issues and actions for the City of
Meridian with John Luthy of The Futures Corporation.
The public is welcome to attend.
, \ \\_~ ~~~p,~ '~'~,r." j,.
\,.\'. ~..... "f:..~'" ,~.t f/,t..
"" .0 I"" r~ .'t.,;c :." ..;. '.-.
..... -..1 '.~ _ .~., ..
~.- ~ '"\. "'~.:r.~ '.
~::::.." c} ?.POfi'.4/'; v.',v'::';._
DATEO?thi .~ day o~J . uaty, 2002.
: . '" SEAL r;~ JI~,6 ,
\. ~>:':;,: .,', T~~ ,{;> ,,:" WilLIAM G. BERG,~gf;TY ~RK
'., :c, ,:~,<:-,~' ;.t , QI.':. ;:
Meridian City Council Special Workshop - January 18, 2002
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and I or hearing, please
contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting.
January 18. 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPllCANT
January 22, 2002
ITEM NO.
~ 3-e
REQUEST Proclamation for Idaho State University Day
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK: See attached
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY AlTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
rr{f(O~
uv1J \r
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property ot the City of Meridian.
Idaho State
Universi1:J
Centennial
Honorary CentelUlial
Committee
Dr. Richard L. Bowen, Chair
Dr. Myron Coulter
Dr. William E. Davis
Dr. Donald E. Walker
Dr. Carl W. McIntosh
The Honorable Dirk Kempthome
The Honorable Philip E. Batt
TIle Honorable Cecil Andrus
The HonorableJohn V. Evans, Sr.
The Honorable Robert E. Smylie
Mr. Farris Edgley
Mr. Howard Edgley
Mr. Milton "Dubby" Holt
Mrs. Patty Olson
Mr. Don Samuelson*
Ms. Becky Robins
Mrs. Isabel Nichols Swisher
Mrs. Paula Jeanne Ward
*Deceased
Centennial Celebration
Task Force
Mr. Glenn Alford
TIle Honorable Greg Anderson
Mr. Chick Bilyeu
Ms. Shirley Buchli
Mr. Michael Calley
Mr. Scott Campbell
Ms. Carol Christie
Mr. Charlie Clark
Ms. Kalhy Daly
Mrs. Shirley Deagle
Mr. Ken Deibert
Dr. Emma Gebo
Mr. Joseph Haber
Ms. DaniJones
Mr. Quane Kenyon
Mr. Bill Kobus
Mr. Rudy Kovacs
Dr. Paul Link
Mr. Jerome Mapp
Dr. Ranaye Marsh
Mrs. Barbara Marshall
Mrs. Rosemary Myers
Mr. Gerald Olsen
Mrs. Sharon Price
Mr. SIeve Rice
. . .
January 7,2002
4~
trY,,,,,-
\..,.~ ',~~~-
c/4./It "l; ~'.'~'
..~. I ,,- ..,.,}......
."t;.' J--""
0J:.h ., v-(.J'
.lr~ O~ft<$' <i-6'?
J~ O.po.j;> ,
'lrj.i/'O./i}
~
The Honorable Robert Corrie
Mayor, City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Avenue
Meridian, ill 83642-
Dear Mayor Corrie:
During the academic year of2001-2002, Idaho State University is celebrating
100 as an educational institution in the state ofIdaho. On February 7,2002,
the University is taking its Centennial Celebration to Idaho's capital city.
There in Boise, as part of the evening's program, Governor Kempthorne will
read a proclamation declaring February 7 as Idaho State University Day in
Idaho. As a 1975 ISU Alunmus and as a Boise City Council Member, I
tho~ght y~lU maybe interested in participating in this celebration.
Enclosed you will find a copy of a Proclamation, which is designed for you to
adopt at your next City Council meeting. We hope a1l200 Idaho cities will
adopt this resolution by February 28, 2002. Please send the signed document
to the Idaho State University Centennial Celebration Office at Campus Box
8042, PocatelIo, Idaho 83209.
Once adopted and received., the Proclamations will become part of a
Centennial Celebration Display on the campus ofIdaho State University.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and your participation in
our University's Celebration. If you have any questions, or if you would like
additional information, please Contact V alone Watkins, Alunmi and
Centennial Director at 800-933-4781 or 208282-3091.
Sincerely,
>11.
M. orne Mapp
Boise City Council Members and
ISU Alunmi Association Board of Directors
Enclosure
Campus Box 8042 . Pocatello, ID 83209
Phone 208-282-3091 . Fax 208.282.4000 . centenniaJ@isu.edu . W'WW.isu.edufcentenniaJ
ISU Is An Equal Opportunity Employer
'WJ-fE'R'E.7t.5, in 1901 'PocateC(o J'vlayor ananew(y eCecteaIaafio Senator'lfieodore
Turn.er yroyosea Senate 'Bi(( #53 to create tfie .Acaaemy of Icfafio; ana
'WJ{'E'R'E.AS, (jovernor :Fran!? W. Hunt signee[ tfiat 6i(( on J'vlarcfi 11, 1901 and- tne
.Academy of Iaafio grew to 6ecome Idafio State 'University in 1963; an~{
WJ{'E'R'E.JlS, tfie Centennia( CeCevration, oGservea auring tfie acaaemic year of
2001-2002, mar!?s tfie one fiunarecf-year anniversary of tfie Girtfi of an
institution of fiigner eaucation; ana
WH'E'R'E..'AS, auring its first century, Iaano State 'University's facuCty ana
students fiave aistinguisfiea tfiemseCves witfi nationa( acaaemic fionors, ana
nave serveaIaalio, tne nation anatfie 1vor(a witfi comyassion ana aedication;
ana
'WJ{'E'RT.JlS, the a(umni of Iaaho State 'University nave acnievecC great success
anahave macre significant contri6utions to society, ana are wicfeIy recognizea
for tneir significant accomy(isliments tfirougliout Iaaho ana tfie 1I'or(el; ana
WH'E'R'E.JlS, the Centennia( CefeGration recognizes tlie 'University's success in
"Creating Legacies.. for air time" in nonor of tlie facuIty. stuaents, staff, al1~{
afumni wlio liave tauglit, (earned; worke~r. ana gracfl.latea from tliis institution;
ana
wH'E'R'E..'AS, Id~lho State 'University nas successfu({y served" the neu(s of more
tnan 80,000 sttu{ents tnrotlghol.lt its 100 years ana nas raised-more tnan 102
miraon ao{(a.rs in its first-ever Cayita( Camyaign; ana
.WH'E'R'E.J\.S, Iaaho State 'University is to Ge commendedfor a century of senlice
to eaucation in Idilno ant-{for acaaemic exce({ence resu{ting in significant
contriGutions to tlie nistoricaf, culturaf, ana economic we{f-Geing of tfie State of
Iaafio, as weC( as die nation ana tfie wor(el;
JVO)V, '1J{'E'R'EYO'RT, 1, I:?o (3,1:: It! Ck R.\is Mayor of tne City of Metli DIA Ai
(:Name) (City)
ao fiereGy yrocfaim !ehrual"'7 'J . 2002 to Ge
/ (Citv)
IV.JU{O S'l.A'l'E 'U:NIY~'RSI'D! V.AlIIN /heal D/,I\-AJ
(City)
January 18, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22,2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO.
REQUEST TFCM Associates Water Main Easement Agreement
~ 3-e,
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See attached
\)rJ./
~
Date: Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
WATER MAIN EASE!\-fENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this ILtvt. day of tlif. ,20Ql:.-between TFCM Associates LLC ,
the parties of the fIrst part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
\VITNESSETII:
\VHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises
and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be
constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain., service and subsequently connect to said
pipeline from time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation, maintenance, repair,
replacement of a water main over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line
and th~y- .allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair
and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such
[acilities at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement andr.ight-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY Ul\T))ERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that after making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to
the water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that
existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be
responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in
this easement that was placed there in Violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
\Vater Main Easelllenl
PaEc I
EASMT WTR
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract ofland, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS \VHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN:
Date
SEE PAGE 3
Date
Signature
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
STATE OF IDAHO)
) ss
County of Ada )
On this day of , 20_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared and
, known or identified to me to be the President and
Secretary, respectively, -of the corporation that-executed the within instrument, and
acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN \VITNESS WHEREOF" 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year fist above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at
Commission Expires:
Wc(er Main Easemenl
Page 2
EASMT.WTR
GRANTOR:
TFCM ASSOCIATES LLC
a Utah limited liability company
By DDR Family Centers LP
Its Managing Member
By DDR DownREIT LLC
Its General Pm1ner
By Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Its Managing Member
~
By:
loa U. Allgood, Semor Vice PreSIdent
Dme: c?~~c~ lu,~OO(
.
STATE OF OHIO )
) SS:
COUNTYOFCUYAHOGA)
BEFORE ME, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
Joan U. Allgood, Senior Vice President of Developers Diversified Realty COlvoration, !Vlan~lgillg
Member of DDR DownREIT LLC, General Partner of DDR Family Centers L.P, Vlan~lging
Member of TFCM ASSOCIATES LLC, the limited liability company which executed the
foregoing instrument, who acknowledged that she did execute the foregoing illSlrulllenl un heb,M
of said limited liability company and that the same is her free and volulltary act and deed <lllll is
the free act and deed of said limited liability company for the uses and purposes thL'rl'lll SL'i 1\\1"11\
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and otlicial seal at lk:lcil\\lHHL
Ohio, this /Lt'fl.. day of f)t.TlJM.e , 200 I.
ELIZABETH A. 8ERRY
Notary Publ ie. Slate or Ohio, Cuys. Ctl-
My Commission fxpkes Msc.. a. 'lh9~
Water Main Easement
Page J
September 25,2001
Page] of3
1.111
.. Quadrant
Con sui tin g, Inc.
EXHIBIT A
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
An easement for the maintenance of a water main located on a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Records
East Subdivision recorded in Book SO of Plats at Pages 8654 to 8656, Ada County Records, in the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 9; thence along the north line of said Section
9 South 89022' 10" East 2,023.49 feet to the centerline of Records A venue; thence leaving said
north line South 00025'00" West 198.47 feet along the said centerline of Records Avenue; thence
leaving said centerline South 89035'00" East 60.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
South 89035 '23" East 20.00 feet; thence
South 00024'37" West 138.52 feet to a point on an existing sewer and water easement in favor of
the City of Meridian as recorded in said plat; thence continuing along said easement
North 89035'23" West 20.00 feet; thence leaving said easement
North 00024'37" East 138.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
405 S. 8th Street. Ste 295 . Boise. ID 83702 . Phone (208) 342.0091 . Fax (208) 042{XJ92 . Internet: quadrant@micron.net
Civil Engineering . SUNeying . Construction Management
September 25, 200 I
Page 2 of3
111111
1111 Quadrant
Consulting. Inc.
EXHIBIT A
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
An easement for the maintenance of a water main located on a portion of Lot I, Block I of Records
East Subdi vision recorded in Book 80 0 f Plats at Pages 8654 to 8656, Ada County Records, in the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 9; thence along the north line of said Section
9 South 89022' 10" East 2,299.84 feet; thence leaving said north line South 00037'50" West 60.00
feet to a point on the north boundary of said Lot I, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing along said north boundary
South 89022' I 0" East 20.00 feet; thence leaving said north boundary
South 00037'50" West 15.00 feet; thence
North 89022' 10" West 20.00 feet; thence
North 00037'50" East 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
405 S. 8th Street. Ste. 295 . Boise. JD B3702 . Phone (20B) 342.0091 . Fox (208) 342-0092 . Internet: quadrant@micran.net
Civil Engineering . SUNeying , Construction Management
0::
W
ID
::2;t')
W
f-LL
0..0
W
(J)t')
o
o
N
U'i
N
I
I
I
W
Z
:J
Z
o
F
()
W
(/)
W
::::l
;z:
W
~
55
if:
Lf.
~[
Q)
N
:1.
o 01
O'<t
~I~
c;nN
CO
(/)W
o
N
f'I
c;n
CO
(/)
'<TO)
(f)(f)
moo
(f)(f)
c..?
Z
Z
Z
c..?
w
OJ
~
o
lO
1"-.
t') 0 .~
'0
g Lfi .0
(J).....
.....
N.
NO
'0
c;n .
COo
ZN
W' c..?
f- . 0 z
Z . 0
o .
W .!-"lO Z
:::!: 1"-..... Z
W t')
(J) 0 c..?
<(
w 0 W
Z OJ
LL
0
..-..
>-. I-
f-~ Z
O::f- 0
W......
0.. D-
OW
o::Z
o..:J
3nN3^V SOHOJ3H
,Lv'86L
M"OO,GZ.OOS
z
a
U1
>
o
:::<::m
0::>
aU)
.....J
0)1-
U)
~<(
"--w
I-U)
So
0:::
a
u
w
0:::
..--
I
(f)
:z: ~ . ---::::;r f- I
z
~
Z
W
::2
W
0:::(J)
w<
~w
<Q::
S:w
uS:
ZW
_(J)
~
(/)0
xZ
! w<
J:. I I
~gl~
~~y .
I
,ZG'sn M"Lr,tZ.Oos
~'''''~,'\.
;;s::~lN3mSV30.,'"
. :-.... '" 'S~,~~:::'S"". '" ~ "
,Z~"8r ~ 3"Lr,vl.OON
_1-
ci
to
'3^ V SOClOJ3Cl
3NIlC/31N3J ~
d
:o~ ~h!l~
.- 5~
:J ::!:: ":l!
(J ~ ld
.. c ~1O~t
..~ ,!.
;;
8'
t!.~
;,.:;:
()
0
...J I-
ID Z
_ W
:::!:
I- W
0 (J)
...J <(
W
OJ Z
Z <(
I- 0 ~
OJ in a:::
I :> w
0 l-
X ID <(
W :::J S:
(J) 0
f- W
(/) (J)
<( 0
W D-
o
(/) 0::
0 D-
o::
0
()
W
0::
E
o
to
o
en
'<t
o
J
l{)
N
I
<n
0>
"
'"Q
W
(J)
-<
w
I
<(
J
o
...J
f-
:::J
o
January 18, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
January 22, 2002
ITEM NO.
REQUEST Public Hearing - Public Work's Fees and Adjustments
8
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See CLt+o..Lheo
&Vii _lI_Jillliiad..
~
. vvvUf
!\ f7 .'.I".;J r. ~ ,:\fJ
~J JrI",' rfI
oj . fI <Jiu" UrJ jJ
{ It Q,,vl>>
oJV
3/1/
Contacted:
Phone:
Date:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
RECElVED
JAM 2 2 2002
CITY OF MERIDlAL'J
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NEW PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND ADJUSTMENTS
The City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 22, 2002 at 6:30 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. The purpose of
the public hearing is to receive public comments regarding imposition of new fees by the Public Works
Department. The fees are necessary to cover the costs of development application review, inspections, site
plan and development plan reviews that are presently not being recouped. Also included is a reduction of
the sewer main inspection fee.
The new and adjusted fees are as follows:
Commercial or Industrial Site Plan
Utility Plan Review
With no new water or sewer mains (services
existing)
With no new water or sewer mains (services not
existing)
With new public water or sewer mains
Drainage Plan Review
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water or sewer mains
New water main
New sewer main
Drainage System Inspection
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Subdivision Plans
Annexation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Water System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System Modeling - by Consultant
Sewer System Modeling - by Public Works
Sewer System Modeling - by Consultant
Final Plat
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Plan Review
Off-site Water or Sewer Main Plan Review
Homeowners Association Pressurized Irrigation
System Review
Initial
Review
Third and Subsequent
Reviews
$68
$102
$34
$51
$204 + $0.40 per lineal foot
$102 + $0.20 per lineal foot
$92
$184
$276
$552
$46
$92
$138
$276
One-time Fee
$30
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$30
$60
$240
$480
One-Time Fee
$82
$82
$82
$160 + $1 per lot
$368
Time and Materials
$368
Time and Materials
$160 + $1 per lot
$200
$240 + $10 per lot
$0.40 per lineal foot
$70 + $5 per lot
Sewage Lift Station Review
Private Street Review
$276
$100 + $0.10 per Hneal foot
along street centerline
Inspection
Water Main Inspection
Sewer Main Inspection (reduce from $2.31 per
lineal foot)
$1.00 per Hneal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
Pressurized Irrigation System Inspection
$150
$225
$300
$240
50 or less services
51 to 1 00 services
101 or more services
Sewage Lift Station Inspection
The public is encouraged to review the proposed fee structure, attend the public hearing and offer
comments and testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written
comments are welcome and need to be submitted I sent to the Meridian City Clerk, 33 E. Idaho Avenue,
Meridian, Idaho 83642 of by fax at 888-4218.
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. The hearing will be
held In a facility that Is accessible to persons with disabilities. Anyone desiring accommodation for
disabilities related to documents and I or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at
least 72 hours prior to the public hearing.
DATED this 28th day of December, 2001.
William G. Berg, Jr. - City Clerk
Published January 4th, 11th, 18th, 2002.
Public Works Department Schedule of Fees - Basis
LABOR HOURS
Personnel PW Staff
Type Billinn Rate
Residential & Commercial Subdivision
Annexation & Zoning Application $82 ETIII 2 $41
Conditional Use Pennit $82 ETIII 2 $41
Planned Unit Development $82 ETIII 2 $41
Preliminary Plat (per each lot) $160 + $1/1ot ET HI 4 $41
By PW. By Consultant
Water ModeHna (if necessarv\ $368 T&M ENG 8 $46
Sewer Modelina (if necessary) $368 T&M ENG 8 $46
Final Plat $160+$1/1ot ETIII 4 $41
Lot Une Adiustment $200 ENG 3 $46
Subdivision Development Plan Review $240 min. + $10fbuildina lot ETlfII 8 $34
Off-Site Water or Sewer Plan Review $O.40/LF
Homeowners Association P.1. Plan Review $70 + $5/1ot ET Illl 2 $34
Sewaoe Lift Station Plan Review (reaardless of sizl $184 ENG 4 $46
Private Street Review $100 + $0.10/LF ENG 4 $46
Water System Inspection $1.00 per lineal foot INSP $30
Sewer System Inspection $1.00 per lineal foot INSP $30
P.1. System Inspection $150 for <50 services; $225 50 to INSP $30
100-services; $300 for >100
services
Sewage Lift Station Inspection $240 INSP 8 $30
COMMERCIAL
Plan Review Initial Subsequent Est. Time
Utilitv Plan Review Review Reviews To Review
w/o new public water or sewer main ET 1/11 2 $34
(services extg.) $68 $34
wlo new public water or sewer main (new ET 1/11 3 $34
services) $102 $51
wi public water or sewer minimum $204 $102 ET 1111 6 $34
additional per LF water or sewer $0.40 $0
Drainane Plan Review
< 1.5 Acre $92 $46 ENG 2 $46
1.5to 10 Acres $184 $92 ENG 4 $46
10 to 20 Acres $276 $138 ENG 6 $46
>20 $552 $276 ENG 12 $46
\Nater~s~m~s~on----------------------------------------------
w/o Public Mains $30 INSP 1 $30
wi Public Mains $1.00 per lineal foot INSP
Sewer Svstem Insoection
wlo Public Mains $30 INSP 1 $30
wI Public Mains $1.00 per lineal foot INSP
Orainaoe Facil1tv Inspection
< 1.5 Acre $30 ENG 1 $30
1.5 to 10 Acres $60 ENG 2 $30
10 to 20 Acres $240 ENG 8 $30
>20 $480 ENG 16 $30
PW Fees
Fee Cales
~ ~~ co<"
"
Iii ....... to.....
a .,.'" .,.fIt
~~u; i <" <" ~ ~ to"'" ~ ....'" 'g~ .....0 co
,.... ..... $~ ~~ t;'f.4 0
.... .... .... .... ....
lJl 'Ih~8 .,. ... fit <1>.... .,. ",<I> rj<l> '"
~ E IF> <I>
~-==
'" ,....<0
~ .... ~$
:I: ....
Q)
J;:
t-
~ ~ ~ ~ $- <:> '" ~:g ~ 'i otO ~8 'A~ ~
\s~ '" ,.... ~~
\It ~ -:,to .... ~ "'.... jh'" fit
'" jh .... 'Q.$ <I> ~t1 0<1>
~ % lit ~u .,. ....
<I> IF>
~ -,::=::;'
~ g :g ~
e .... !1f ;'b
~
.... \0;;;' ~ '" to ~ l ....0 ~ ....~ \B% ~i li1
ci .... .... to~ ~';t;
~ ~ ~ ~ 1ft
z lJl~8 .,. ~~ *~ ",1ft
~ .s '"
~ ==-
0; $ gt::
ell ~~
:g
lO
$ ~ ~~ ~ ~- Ul $g ~ 'i tOtO g.~ ~'B, g
.... i~~ ,.... g.E:
~ '" ~ ~ ~~ $.... .,.
ci ~ .... z <,,0 aiui
z .s '" ~ U f/> ........ <,,$ ~
t .2 ~ ~ ",,,, .,.
~~$
u .... :3 ~
~ ........
?6
l~"@ ~ b ..... <:> ~'A 0 ~"~" ~8 ~~ '"
.... 0 .... - .,. ';;;
'*" N ~ \;; ~ ~ '4"..... \ ~..tl
~ $ "'~u '" a~ $.~ ~
.(;; ~ --
ll- t;. ",'4"
C <,,'"
E M~
:>
'S
'"
r-- ~ g g ~ In <0 0 .....N "'.... ~jB;!
<"t;.'" ....to ",<0
~s <it .... .... $ ~ '" ~~ t-..~ ",<I>
'" '"
'<I '" "'~u z ........ ~
'"' :g .,.'" 1ft
~ ~~
2 ~ ~tfj 0; <Ii $ 3 1~ ~
U '<IN iQ) U"
.. ........ lI-lI- \~
-~ c: 0
Q) 0 U,,'" '-g
to ,g,> '.g t to
-e {?& \~ u.. .J~ 0..
'"
~ ~~ s ;s s &,$ ,$
!~ 0 OJ 0 S Iii
E l* l- t- t
g I-r -0 ~
\~ 0> ga l- f/)
.S l~\~
cO :g
.~ ~ g;';g
''is "i5 0 15
.... ~'Al""
c: :;:. c: .,. ':dili
.... l~ li> ....
~ ~ N <It <0 8 ... '" ~ 8.8. ~iA-I1l~ <:>
~ ... ~ ~ .. c: 'ill'> ,.... .g .. (j') 0 ....
~ ~ ........ M
g g 'E- . ... + ""fit g'88- IF>
ro gg g ~.-..-~
.... .... 0 II>
.,. fit .... .... f/>~O'"
'" ~ .,. $- \
ill
ill g
u.. '0
'0 Vi ,
ill 'S \ % \
"S ~ 't
(/)"& ~ "
l.~ g'
~-5 rJ) 'i "ti .t;.
0.. III 'to ,~ \ ~ %
~\ u \~ 1\ c ~a. c:
i "5 ~ .. c-' 't 0
c:: p;: ,910: -
:a -u ~ a. c: a: jl
~ c:: c c c
U1~ E 2: l ~ \ ~ 0 \1 l"\ 0..
U r~ .. E
zOo 0 I~ ~ 0: .~ c
'" ~ c 0
0.3 () .S Q) Q) 1<:: 1'-'= C -% IIlg <= ~ c
C ll- 3 Q) e.i 0 fii S "' 0
a;~ cl):?i 'Ih a; g \g % ~ ~ a:; E g. ~
50 -a.., ? "" 0: ~ \ ,,? ~~ (j) 1 \1 E ,$
':t:l c to c <=' ! ~ '5 3."' ;1a Ii E ;1a
-3. c 0 c ? " $ J ::; II> J
o \.1 ~.~ ;% '" c '" '.~ ..i Q) (/) ~ .,
01::= Q) .~ ~t 0- <= ;g eX> II> t t:D
Vi Q) '" c .. :;} "" '" t~ ~ .s t
:;)J:l &~ '5 c e "'! E
(/)'C.. ,91 c 15 '" '6~ "'
0 ll- 0- 3. III ~ J (/) III 'in 0.. 3. f/) 0.. III
,
'"
Q)
%-
~
\lJ
~
f/)
$
\J..
K
QJ
.!!
3:
GJ
'S:
2!
"'iii
~"'
._ c
- .,
O"Q.
~
Oll!o
~8:
.,
E
O! II '"
8l c
tL 1; .~
'0 3: '~
cu .9! L...
'3~-g
OO'g"'(\I
~'5~~
l:l.(/):l=
::i: 1:: g-~
<CGJll;
x E :l '"
W 1ij 1II:g
..J Q. 'l:I .,
<c~lii<3
u~"Eg
o::::~:c:
w 0 l-
::i:::
::;E,g
OJ::>
()~
ml1
" a.
'in <(
,.. ~
$ :l
~E
o ~
<(
0':I0~
0':I~,
~m~
...
'"
c
5
o
'"
t;
to
:r:
o
~I'-~
g~u1
~
'"
o
80.
t:::E
.,(0
.c
W
o
~ '"
oO,},GJ
,)-
~
l:!
o
o
u:
o
~<II
oOu1~
~
-
to
~
f.9
OJ
c,..
(\10.
'0-
.;:: :&.
.. '"
:2 0
f.9
o
~ '"
OO~~
~
~
o .
... E
.g;,2
5W
0.
0':1 0
~o;;;;
N ~
ti:ti:uc.:
-'-'<(g:
6~ni.Q
~ ~ ~ ~
(f.)<((f.)
.9 ..;:
:n g ~ QJ
~-g.EZ
0. f!
Cl
E
~ ~
g- ,!1!
<II iii
.go::
(f.)
"'iii ~
:= ':;
'2 Q}
-0:::
;t
GJ
'S:
GJ
0:
c
..
0:
a; Q)
3: 3:
'" '"
~ ~~
o 0"'2
~~S~
~ ~ ~,~
.9 ",.9 ~
~.~ ~ ~
a. ~ <>. S:
I~HH
ii:
:5
a
m
N
o
Z;
'"
o
Z;
N
o
Z;
i'O
01}
El
y;
'<I'
o
N
01}
'<I'
o
N
01}
'<I'
o
N
~
'"
o
;;;
~
N
~
E
:l
E
'c
'f
I
(;
.$
~
,9
::0
::J
<>.
~
I'-
:3
01}
o
N
d
01}
o
'<I'
d
w
I
'"
5
...
'"
~
u..
-'
8-
"'iii
c
~
'6
"
to
r-..
0_
;;;
I(}
0':1
(")
W
(()"'<O(()
'<1'010':11'-
""U)---N
WOI}
NC1i"''''
m~~m
~~~
'" "'
~ <D
o ~
CL><(~
.~ ~e~
iii~.8.8o
O:::"-~ON
~ V~~^
..
([
~
to
C
'e
Cl
C1i
;;;
!
I
~ C'") ~~,
~g'<l'~"!.1
~~ N'<I'I
~ ~~I
i
i
(") "I ~ :311
~~~(")q,
W~ t'l'Y;1
I
I
(() (") 01'
<0 '<I' ~ fJ NI
N -- ..--.:r,
~~ wWI
~
,
I
(() (") (") m'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
ww wwl
I
1
;
I
'" (") <0 "I,
re:!N~[01
w w ~ OI}I
I
1
:
!g (") @ ~l
"!. l):! '<I' '<1'. ":'
&; v;. ~ ~!
I
jg ifi ~ * "81
il g ,ill .f 0,
::J iii;t 3:1
II) 0:: '" .!!!,
15 '~ iiil
.... .... 0::::,
.z cDml
ED:::-
::J ~,
z I
(")
'<I' 0
~ (")
N w
w
M
(")
"'.
;;;
;;!;
;;;
g
~
'<I'
<0
Y;
g
...,.
u
C1i
;;;
o
&l
g
W
'<I'
co
Z;
o
(')
w
'<I'
<0
W
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
\
I
,
I <II II>
" c: -en t: U)
I '0; .5 '0; .5
, c:::!':.. c::!: '"
I ,2 u::!: ,2 u::!:
, i~~lj~~
! ~ ~ ~Ig ~ ~
! ~~~~~~
Ie ~ -
1!!1
,.2 (f.) 16)
111 ~ :v
,It 2 :>:
I"' to Ii)
,5 ?; Cf)
I
I
"0
.2
n;
<II
~
~
08
M .
'fl ~
'fl
08
&l.-:
~
5:!
a>
'fl
I'-
(')
(')
...,.
]
n;
<D
&
8.
OR~~
~li)N'<I'
'fl w
<: '" '"
o !!! <D
t<D~~
~<(t>~o
c "I
;-~.2.2o
;f;:,.-t.f:!ON
1jV"-T""-A
If
~
to
C
'e
Cl
o
CD
W
<D<')o)
....0....
N<DOO
";N,D
<I> U) .,.
II>
CL>
0.
E
'"
x
w
E
E
o
o
o
<0
~
"'CIO<')
CIO."CIO
0. co "".
zq.VJ-Sj.
o
'"
<fl
""00)
NN;g
:L~U)
@
~
""00>
NN~
~....It)
.,. I/) .:.or
o
<0
~
NON
""co<D
~Ifl~
o
<0
W
(1)<')""
<')<,)<D
,.. N 0)
MN";
.,. Ifl .,.
'"
:Jl
u..
s:
0.
in in in
(Il III IV
IV IV (Il
U. U. u.
~.Q~
>Uf-
&8-
ro.s
~
Public Works Department Sc~- ....ule of Fees - Revenue Projection
Subdivision Development '
FY '01 Data & Estimates
Annexation/Zoning Apps:
Conditional Use Permits:
Planned Unit Development:
Subdivision Estimate:
HOA PI Systems Estimate:
Lift Stations:
Lot Line Adjustments:
Private Street
Sewer (FY '01 Est.):
Water (FY '01 Est.):
Quantity
50
25
5
30
5
2
6
2
82633
75521
Lots
1200
150
3000
LF
LF
ANNUAL REVENUE
Boise Quantity Unit
Feb-g9 Cost Cost
Annexation & Zoning Application $82 $4,100
Conditional Use Permit $82 $2,050
Planned Unit Development $82 $410
$375 to
Preliminary Plat (per each lot) $160 + $1/Jot $820 total $4,800 $1,200
By P.w. By Consultant
Water ModelinQ (if necessary) $368 T&M
Sewer Modelino (if necessary) $368 T&M
_.
Final Plat $160 + $1/lot $10/lot $4,800 $1,200
Lot Line Ad;ustment $200 $105 $1,200
Subdivision Development Plan Review $240 min. + $10/bullding lot $8,400 $12,000
Off-Site Water or Sewer Plan Review $0.40/LF
Homeowners Association P.1. Plan Review $70 + $5/lot $350 $750
Sewage Lift Station Plan Review (regardless of si:; $276 $552
Private Street Review $100 + $O.10/LF $200 $300
Water System Inspection $1.00 per lineal foot $75,521
Sewer System Inspection $1.00 per lineal foot $1.70 $82,633
P.1. System Inspection $150 for <50
services; $225 50
to 100 services;
$300 for >100
services $750
Sewage Lift Station Inspection $240 $416
II Total Fees:
Inspection Fees:
Review Fees:
PW Fees
$28,028
$201,632
$158,904
$42,728
$173,604
II
Annual Revenue
Public Works Department Sct>--iule of Fees - Revenue Projection
,
Commercial Applications '
Utility Plan Review
wlo new public water or sewer main
(services extg.) $68 $34 $1,360
wlo new public water or sewer main (new
services only) $102 $51 $1,020
wI public water or sewer minimum $204 $2,040
additional per LF water or sewer $0.40 $32,000
-
DrainaQe Plan Review
< 1.5 Acre $92 $46 $1,380
1.5 to 10 Acres $184 $92 $3,680
10 to 20 Acres $276 $138 $1,104
>20 $552 $276 $552
----~------~---~-----------------------~----------------_._--~-,-
Water System Inspection
wlo Public Mains $30 $900
wi Public Mains $1.00 per lineal foot $5,000
Sewer System Inspection
w/o Public Mains $30 $900
wi Public Mains $1.00 per lineal foot $3,000
Drainaae Facilitv Insoection
< 1.5 Acre $30 $450
1.5 to 10 Acres $60 $1,200
1 0 to 20 Acres $240 $960
>20 $480 $480
FY '01 Data & Estimates
Total Applications FY '01
No WIS services
W/S services only
Water Footage
Sewer Footage
Drainage Reviews:
< 1.5 Acre
1.5 to 10 Acres
1 0 to 20 Acres
>20
Third and subsequent review fee =
2
Quantity
40
20
10
5000
3000
(36 actual)
15
20
4
1
50%
of initial review fee
Initial
Review
ANNUAL REVENUE
Quantity
Cost
Unit
Cost
Subsequent
Reviews
II Total Fees:
$16,026 $40,000
$56,026 II
Inspection Fees:
Review Fees:
$12,890
$43,136
PW Fees
Annual Revenue
Budget Requirements
Public Works
Percentage assigned to development:
PW Budget assigned to development:
Water Dept Inspectors
$803,685
72%
labor:
Vehicle/Equip per Year (est):
Total Development Costs:
$578,653
$105,000
$8,000
$683,653
Percent Funded by Proposed Fees: 38%
Total Inspection Costs
Public Works (Sewer & Drainage)
Water Dept.
labor
$85,000
$105,000
Vehicle/Equip.
$8,000
$8,000
Projected Inspection Fee Revenue:
Percent Projected To Be Funded by Fees:
T ota. Review Costs
Public Works (total less inspection)
Projected Review Fee Revenue:
Percent Projected To Be Funded by Fees:
Total P.W. Oevelopment-Related Budget
Total == $683,653
1162%
[] 38%
o Funded By Proposed Fees
II Unfunded By Proposed Fees
Inspection Budget
o Funded By Proposed Fees
II Unfunded By Proposed Fees
Development (Review-Related)
Budget
3
PW Fees
[] Funded By Proposed Fees
III Unfunded By Proposed Fees
Total
$93,000
$113,000
$206,000
$171,794
83%
$485,653
$85,864
18%
Annual Revenue
STATISTICS
FY'01 LOT, WATER & SEWER QUANTITIES
Estimated Estimated
Lots Water LF Sewer LF LF/lot LF /lot Water LF SewerLF
1 Autumn Faire No.1 47 3676 4160 78 89
2 Autumn Faire No.2 32 5567 4385 174 137
3 Bear Creek Subdivision No.2 34 2491 2791
4 Bear Creek Subdivision No.3 43 3150 3530
5 Bear Creek Subdivision No.4 30 2198 2463
6 BridgetowerlPrimeland Subdivision 127 9305 10426
7 Cafarelli SUbdivision 3 220 246
8 Comr Creek AKA English Gardens Phil 50 3400 5180 68 104
9 Devlin Place No.2 20 1465 1642
10 Edinburgh Place Subdivision No.1 56 2080 4590 37 82
11 Elliollndustrial Parle 2 147 164
12 Gemtone No.4 5 366 410
13 Macaile Meadows Subdivision 130 5416 4806 42 37
14 Meridian Greens NO.4 16 1172 1314
15 MtJrdoch No.2 10 1299 1023 130 102
16 Mys1elY VIeW SUbdivision 2 147 164
17 Observation Point 92 6741 7553
18 Presidantial Subdivision 4 293 328
19 Staten Park Subdivision 28 2051 2299
20 The Hollows Subdivision 12 598 1297 50 108
21 Tremore Subdivision 15 1099 1231
22 Treasure View Subdivision 3 220 246
23 Tumble Creek Subdivision No.5 & 6 79 5788 6486
24 Vienna Woods No.3 17 1246 1396
25 Vienna Woods No.4 23 1587 1446 69 63
26 Wanda's Meadow Subdivision 26 1320 1760 51 68
27 Wilkins Ranch Village SUbdivision 49 1675 1565 34 32
Total: 955 26618 30212 38099 42690
Average: 73 82
Std. Dev.: 45 33 H2O SEW
Total Subdivision Footage: 64717 72902
Off-Site Projects H2O SEW
Ten Mile SeYJer & Water Ex!. #2 3000 3500
Silverstone Off.site 7804 4031
Bear Creek By-Pass Sewer 2200
Subtotal: 10804 9731
FY '01 TOTAL FOOTAGES: 75521 82633
PW Fees
FY '01 Stats
Public Works Department Schedule of Fees
Residential & Commercial SubdivisIons
Meridian Meridian Boise
Public Works P&Z Deot. Namoa Seo-01
Annexalion & Zonino Aoolication (lOci, in P&Z fee) $82 $550 <1 Ac - $425
$550 + $151Ac >1 Ac = $850
Conditional Use Perm~(incl. in P&Z fee\ $82 $325 <1 Ac = $220
$325 + $151Ac >1 Ac = $435
Planned Unit Pevelonmenllincl. P&Z fee\ $82 $4SO ... $11/Ac $740
Preliminary Pial (per each lot) $160 + $1IIot < 510ts = $450 $230 + $5.75/101 < 510ls = $375
$450 + $11/101 5-10 = $450
11-30 = $625
> 30 101s = $820
BvP.W. Bv Consult.
Waler Modelina flf necessarv) $368 T&M
Sewer Modalina (if nooessarv) $368 T&M
Final Pial $160 + $1/101 $325 + $11/101 $350 + $24.14/101 $101101
lot line Adiustment $200 $240 $105
Subdivision Development Plan Review $240 min. + $10/building 101 included in final plat
Off-Site Water or Sewer Plan Review $OAOilF
Homeownern Association P.1. Plan Review $70 + $5IIot $250 Oncl. inspec!.) $250 1s1 phase
$150 add. Phases
Sewage Lift Stalion Plan Review $276 -
(regardless of size)
Privale Street Review S100 + $0.1 O/LF $150
Waler Svstem Insoection $1.00 per LF <500 LF = $1.15/lF; 501 United Waler Idaho
to 1000 LF= $1.00ilF;
1001102000 LF =
Sewer System Inspection $1.00 perLF $0.85ilF; 2001 to 3000 = $1.70
$O.65/lF; >3000 LF =
O.$45/LF
$150 for <50 selVices; $225
P.!. System Inspection for 50 to 100 SBlVices; $300 $75 each phase
for >100 selVices
Sewage Lift Station Inspection $240
Variance
ModirlCallon of Condition
Bonding AgraemenllRenewal
Time Extension for Platting
Street Name Change Request
Flood Plain Leller
OTHER FEES CHARGED BY NEIGHBORING MUNICIPALITIES
Meridian
Public Works
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Meridian
P&Z Dapt.
$310
$0
$0
$100
$0
$0
Nampa
$250
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Boise
$150
$150
$150
$115
$100
$20
CITY { > MERIDIAN ~ PUBLIC WORK( JEPT
SUBDMSION PLAN REVIEW FEE CALCULA T/ONS
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE PARTY:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONElFAXJEMAIL:
I
I
REVIEW FEES
!Water Modeling
PW: $368.00
Consultant:
$
$
ISewer Modeling
IOff Site Water/Sewer
I Private Street
PW: $368.00
Consultant:
LF x $0.40 =
$
$100.00 plus
LF x $0.10 =
$
IHOA PI Plan & O&M
$70.00 plus
_Bldg lots x $5.00 =
$
ISubdivision Development
$200.00 plus
Lots x $10.00 =
ISewage Lift Station
Flat Fee of: $276.00
$
$
IFinal Plat
$160.00 plus
Lots x $1.00 =
I Lot Line Adjustment
Flat Fee of: $200.00
$
$
SUBTOTAL:
INSPECTION FEES
IWater System
I Sewer System
Ip.1. System / # of SeIVices
LF x $1.00 =
$
$
$
LF x $1.00 =
< 50 $150.00
50 to 100 $225.00
> 100 $300.00
Isewage Lift Station
Flat Fee of: $240.00
$
SUBTOTAL:
-----------..............------------------------------
CHARGES ABOVE TO BE BILLED AND PAID PRIOR TO:
TOTAL DUE:
c==]Final Plat Signature c===JBuilding Permit
c==]Precon c===JOther:
Invoice Prepared By:
Date:
CITY O~ ,iI1ERIDIAN - PUBLIC WORK$.~EPT
COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL PROJECT PLAN REVIEW FEE CALCULA TlONS
REV!EI!V#
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE PARTY:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONElFAXlEMAIL:
I
I
Utility Plan Review
I Iw/o new public water or sewer main (services extg.)
I IW/o new public water or sewer main (new services)
I Iwl public water or sewer minimum
Initial
Review
$68
3rd & Subsequent
Reviews
$34
$102
$51
$204.00 plus
$102.00 plus
LF x $0.40 =
LF x $0.20 =
D' PI R .
ramaae an eVlew
< 1.5 Acre
1 .5 to 10 Acr
10 to 20 Acre
>20
es
s
$92
$184
$276
$552
$46
$92
$138
$276
Water System Inspection
I _Iw/o Public Mains
Iwl Public Mains
$30
LF x $1.00=
$30
Iwl Public Mains
LF x $1.00=
$30
$60
$240
$480
--------------....----------...------_......---~-----_.
CHARGES ABOVE TO BE BILLED AND PAID PRIOR TO:
Bprecon
Building Permit
Other:
Invoice Prepared By:
Date:
....... ......... _ "" ... _ _.....&...... .( ...~\. ...., ...'. j ... ..J.,J V
L::r I.... l\.
!C 02
BUIl_Ol('~-::; CO\lTRi\CTC'JRS A SSOClA TiOI\.:
OF SO'JTYWESTERN ION-iO. L\JC
(c _ J', _SC:Jv~(f W<Jj. ~u :'. A
E'a'5~ loano ~:n <3
12::9.377-3550
i2C2: 377.?SS3 f;~x
"A Tr 20J['0'1 (>F 9:J:ld!(1g Exc~:!e'1ce Since 1950"
~!i:AfuL
..I-\o....-1)"Jr-D'
January 18,2002
Brad Watson, PE
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian. ID 83641
Dear Brad:
Thank you for taking the time to present the proposed new Public Works fees for Meridian to me
Building Contral.:lVrS Association of Southwest em Idaho (BCASW1) Developer's Council.
The Developer's CouncH has reviewed the proposed fees, and does agree v.ith City slaffthat
they are reasonable at rhi ,time. BCASWI is hopeful that the increase in f€'~$ will result in a
subsequent increase in output on behalf of the Public Works Department.
It is also the feeling Ofr.hi: Developer's Council that any future proposal to increase these fees
should be nOTiced well il. <ldvance, and be tied to evidenc~ v: increased performance by the City.
Again, thank you for takin,g the time to work with the BCASWI on this issue. We look fOIV/ard
[0 continuing our good '.",)rking relationship with the Meridian Public Works Department in the
future.
Sincere!....
fu(
~
Jay Clow, President
BCAS Wl
cc: Mayor Corrie
~TQ": 21
~ ~. .-., ~
. ,..l...
212;]773553
PACE.122
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NEW PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND ADJUSTMENTS
The City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 22, 2002 at 6:30 p.m,
in the City Council Chambers at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. The purpose of
the public hearing is to receive public comments regarding imposition of new fees by the Public Works
Department. The fees are necessary to cover the costs of development application review, inspections, site
plan and development plan reviews that are presently not being recouped. Also included is a reduction of
the sewer main inspection fee.
The new and adjusted fees are as follows:
Commercial or Industrial Site Plan
Utility Plan Review
With no new water or sewer mains (services
existing)
With no new water Of sewer mains (services not
existing)
With new public water Of sewer mains
Drainage Plan Review
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10,0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water or sewer mains
New water main
New sewer main
Drainage System Inspection
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Subdivision Plans
Annexation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Water System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System MOdeling - by Consultant
Sewer System Modeling - by Public Works
Sewer System Modeling - by Consultant
Final Plat
Lot Une Adjustment
Development Plan Review
Off-site Water or Sewer Main Plan Review
Homeowners Association Pressurized Irrigation
System Review
Initial
Review
Third and Subsequent
Reviews
$68
$34
$102
$51
$204 + $0.40 per lineal foot
$102 + $0.20 per lineal foot
$92
$184
$276
$552
$46
$92
$138
$276
One-time Fee
$30
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$30
$60
$240
$480
One-Time Fee
$82
$82
$82
$160 + $1 per lot
$368
Time and Materials
$368
Time and Materials
$160 + $1 per lot
$200
$240 + $10 per lot
$0.40 per lineal foot
$70 + $5 per lot
Sewage Lift Station Review
Private Street Review
$276
$100 + $0.10 per lineal foot
along street centerline
Inspection
Water Main Inspection
Sewer Main Inspection (reduce from $2.31 per
lineal foot)
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
Pressurized Irrigation System Inspection
$150
$225
$300
$240
50 or less services
51 to 100 services
101 or more services
Sewage Lift Station Inspection
The public is encouraged to review the proposed fee structure, attend the public hearing and offer
comments and testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per parson. Written
comments are welcome and need to be submitted I sent to the Meridian City Clerk, 33 E. Idaho Avenue,
Meridian, Idaho 83642 of by fax at 888-4218.
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. The hearing will be
held in a facility that is accessible to persons with disabilities. Anyone desiring accommodation for
disabilities related to documents and I or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at
least 72 hours prior to the public hearing.
DATED this 28th day of December, 2001.
William G. Berg, Jr. - City Clerk
Published January 4th, 11th, 18th, 2002.
From: Shari Stiles [stiless@ci.meridianJd.us]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 4:08 PM
To: City Clerk; William G. Berg Jr.
Subject: FeePubNotice
Tara, please see that the Idaho Statesman publishes this for the next three weeks. I want it
published 3 times because I want to make sure we don't have any procedural problems
with the notice. Thank you!
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF :MERIDIAN
NEW PLANNING & ZONING FEES / FEE INCREASES
The City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,
November 27, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Meridian City Hall, 33 E.
Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. The purpose of the public hearing is to receive public
comments regarding imposition of new fees and proposed fee increases associated with
the Planning & Zoning Department. The increased and new fees are necessary to cover
the costs of development applications, site inspections, site and landscape plan reviews,
certificates of zoning compliance, etc., that are not being recouped through the present
fee structure.
Copies of the proposed fee schedule are available for public inspection and review, at the
following locations:
Meridian City Hall, Clerk's Office
33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Meridian Planning & Zoning Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202, Meridian, Idaho
The proposed fees can be reviewed free of charge at these locations during normal
business hours. The public is encouraged to review the proposed fee structure, attend the
public hearing and offer comments and testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to
three (3) minutes per person. Written comments are welcome. Please send written
comments to the Meridian City Clerk, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 or
by fax at 888-4218.
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
The hearing will be held in a facility that is accessible to persons with disabilities.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public
hearing.
DATED this 9th day of November, 2001.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
City of Meridian
NEW PUBLIC WORKS FEES
The City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 22, at 6:30 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. The purpose of the
public hearing is to receive public comments regarding imposition of new fees by the Public Works
Department. The fees are necessary to cover the costs of development application review, inspections, site
plan and development plan reviews that are presently not being recouped. Also included is a reduction of
the sewer main inspection fee.
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. The hearing will be
held in a facility that is accessible to persons with disabilities. Anyone desiring accommodation for
disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least
72 hours prior to the public hearing.
Commercial or Industrial Site Plan
Initial
Review
Third and Subsequent
Reviews
Utility Plan Review
With no new water or sewer mains (services
existing)
With no new water or sewer mains (services not
existing)
With new public water or sewer mains
$68
$34
$51
$102
$204 + $0.40 per lineal foot
$102 + $0.20 per lineal foot
Drainage Plan Review
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
$92
$184
$276
$552
$46
$92
$138
$276
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water or sewer mains
New water main
New sewer main
One-time Fee
$30
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
Drainage System Inspection
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
$30
$60
$240
$480
Water System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System Modeling - by Consultant
Sewer System Modeling - by Public Works
Sewer System Modeling - by Consultant
One-Time Fee
$82
$82
$82
$160 + $1 per Jot
$368
Time and Materials
$368
Time and Materials
Subdivision Plans
Annexation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Plan Review
Off-site Water or Sewer Main Plan Review
$160 + $1 per Jot
$200
$240 + $10 per lot
$0.40 per lineal foot
Homeowners Association Pressurized Irrigation
System Review
Sewage Lift Station Review
Private Street Review
Inspection
Water Main Inspection
Sewer Main Inspection (reduce from $2.31 per
lineal foot)
Pressurized Irrigation System Inspection
Sewage Lift Station Inspection
$70 + $5 per lot
$276
$100 + $0.10 per lineal foot
along street centerline
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$150
$225
$300
$240
50 or less services
51 to 100 services
101 or more services
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
PROJECT NUMBER
CJaI1t-ca1-p. 22 ( 2 o[) 2- P- #- B
j?1t.6b !In-# her 1 ;fdlfL~~
DATE
PROJECT NAME
NAME FOR AGAINST
_.
J
I
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF D'ALESSIO
BUILDING DEVELOPMENT,
FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL
PLAT FOR STATE PARK
SUBDIVISION, LOCATED
SOUTH OF WEST USTICK
ROAD AND EAST OF NORTH
BLACK CAT ROAD,
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
CIC 02105102
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. FP-OI-OI5
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval
pursuant to Meridian City Code & 12-3-7 on February 5,2002, and the Council
finding that the Administ.rative Review is complete which has included certain
comments and conditions as stat.ed in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bruce
Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning
Administrator, listing 8 General Comments and 22 Site Specific Comments, which
are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the Februmy 5, 2002 meeting, Shari
Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Reese Leavitt of Leavitt & Associates
Engineers, Inc., commented at the hearing, and no one appeared in opposition, and
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL
PLAT FOR STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION (FP-OI-OI5)
- I
the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council
takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Plat of "STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION" as evidenced in Plat
bearing the "STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION BEING A PORTION OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 4, OF SECTION 3, T3N., R1W., BM., ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO LYING NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE EIGHT MILE
LATERAL, 2001, SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS, INDEX NO. 314-3-0-0-0-00-00, JOB
NO. 00281.001, LEAVITT &ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC.", and D'ALESSIO
BUILDING DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPER, is Conditionally Approved subject to
those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor
and City Council from Bruce Frec1deton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles,
Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated September 14, 2001, listing 8 General
Comments and 22 Site Specific Comments, a true and correct copies are attached
hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages, and by this reference
incorporated herein, with the additional requirements as follows, to-wit:
1.1 Deputy Fire Chief, Joseph Silva, requires that a fire-flow be
provided as required by the 1997 Uniform Fire Code Appendix
III-A. Show all proximity hydrants within 500' of the project on
the resbumitted plat.
1.2 All corners shall have a 28' inside radius and 48' outside radius.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL
PLAT FOR STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION (FP-01-015)
- 2
1.3 The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway District
Standards.
1.4 Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon
acceptance of the water system by the City of Meridian for water
quality.
1.5 Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the
Meridian Fire Department.
1.6 Insure all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of
combustible vegetation per section 1103.2.4 of the UFC.
1.7 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District notes that the
proposed project is currently in the District's review process. The
District reserves all comments until the review process is
complete.
1.8 Comply with the Central District Health Department's
Environmental Health Division on the Final Plat dated 8/27/01.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of
the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's
requirements shall be signed only at such time as:
2.1 The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been
issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-
site improvements.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL
PLAT FOR STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION (FP-Ol.015)
-3
_712-
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
Feb/l-l-vVL "1-
(j
,2002.
day of
~~yf). ~.
OR ROBERT D. CORRIE -
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public
Works Department.
i,\~~~'~21~~~~~;,:~~~:.~." " ,
$ C) ",pro'>, h,........,.,,, . .
2470 J .~.~:.'. ":L"~O) ....".:... ;,
. &:$'~J!..l~.: ." ,:~.:
- -e. i"~ . ,. ';:'
~. . '< v,~ tj;;. .. <;
~ ~,,-~~ \.J~ .>~_ , . f): _fl ,,(': .<:
....0 -";}'fr 1'-:';7 "7',~'
.c'C:;;~"":::,w,,~~;,>l
\\NP ASVRDCO I \SERVERZ\ W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Staten Park Sub FPO 1.0 15\FPOrderO j .015 .doc ' .
By~~~9
ity Clerk ~
Dated:
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL
PLAT FOR STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION (FP-OI-015)
-4
l'vIAYOR
Raben: D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALlEY
A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTh1ENT
r.,08) 288-2499 . F"-,, 288-2501
CITY OF J\1ERIDIAN PUBLIC\~RKS
33 EAST IDAHO e;fc. 'I'"Ie e.i.t"8 =.;~~:;:~
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 A J 0 '"V'\A I
(208) 888-#33 . F.A...X (208) 887-4813 UCl. D, c;::7VV PLANNING AND ZONn-JG
Gty Qerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 -r 0 #- 11 DEP.'\RIMENT
..J,. i.e 1"\.. (208) 884-5533 . F.A..'{ 888-6854
CITY COUNaLMEMBERS
Ron Andet:Son
Keith Bird
T:unmy deWeerd
Olerie McCandless
MEMORANDUM:
September 14, 2001
To:
Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor & City Council
Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer ~
Shari Stiles, Planning Director/Zoning Administrator ~
RECEIVED
SEP i 4 2001
From:
Re:
Final Plat for STATEN PARK SUBDIVISION
23 Buildable Lots on 8.15 Acres by D' Alessio Building Development
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments as conditions of the application.
These conditions shall be considered InJull, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the
Meridian City Council:
LOCATION
The parcel is located on the south side ofUstick Road, ~ mile east of Black Cat Road.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Ustick Road and unincorporated agricultural land, zoned RUT.
South: Platted Lakes at Cherry Lane Subdivision, zoned R-4.
East: Platted Wrlkins Ranch Subdivision,. zoned R -4.
West: Rural Residential parcels, zoned RUT.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Sanitary sewer to this site shall be via extensions from mains installed in the adjacent phases
of Wilkins Ranch Subdivision. Water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing
mains in U stick Road. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the
Public Works Department. The lots \Vithin this development will be subject to applicable
latecomer fees.
2. The soils investigation report submitted with the application indicates that groundwater was
encountered at some fairly shallow depths within the project site (approximately 5.5 feet
deep). Design engineer to provide a statement of compliance, prior to the approval of
development plans, which certifies that the centerline finish grade of the streets is at least
three feet above the established normal groundwater elevation. This is an effort to ensure that
the building footings are at least one foot above the high groundwater.
3. Applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be
a continuation of the existing system owned and maintained by the Nampa & Meridian
Stnlm Pul: SubdivlsUm.IP
!'P.{ll.o15
EJth.. l,;J ,.
19/
'f
Mayor and City Council
September 14, 2001
Page 2
Irrigation District.
4. Deed restrictions will be required for ail lots adjacent to the pathway to limit the height of
sight-obscuring fencing to no more than four feet high. Fencing within 20 feet ofrights-of-
way may not exceed three feet in height. Provide recorded copies ofthe deed restriction prior
to applying for building permits.
5. The requirement for tiling of the Eight Mile Lateral is waived.
6. A detailed landscape plan for the common areas, including fencing locations, pathways and
types of construction, was to be submitted f,?r review and approval with the submittal of
the final plat. The landscape plan submitted does not meet the requirements of the
Landscape Ordinance. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs,
betming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. No fencing will be
permitted within the landscape buffers. Landscaping is also required adjacent to the
pathway between Lots 3 and 5, Block 3-; The five-foot-wide walking path shown on the
final plat was approved as an eigh~foot-wide pathway in the preliminary plat. If the
proposal is only for a five-foot-wide path, justification should be given for the change
along with a commitment for how the rem:lining one and one-baIf feet on each side of the
pathway will be maintained.
7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
pathways. landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat. All improvements must be completed prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
8. Add a symbol to the legend for the public utilities, irrigation and drainageeas~ll1entsh.own 011
the lots.
9. The applicant shall build an eight-foot-wide walking pathway adjacent to the Eight Mile
Lateral, then from the Eight :Mlle Lateral along the easterly boundary back to W. Campfire
Street.
10. Applicant shall be responsible to construct permanent perimeter fencing, except where the
City has expressly agreed, in writing, that such fencing is not necessary. Fencing is to be
in place prior to applying for building permits.
11. Provide corrected calculations of gross density and net density from page 1 of the
application.
12. Recreational amenities of parks and a walking path are shown as being provided to the
City (item 9, page 1 of application). The City does not accept ownership or maintenance
responsibility of these areas.
fP-OI.{)JS
EJt,fuO b;e/
"
SlaleDParI:Sub.fp
Mayor and City Council
September 14, 2001
Page 3
13. Minimum frontage for lots in an R-4 zone is 80 feet. Lots 3~ 4 and 6~ Block 5, only meet
this requirement on one side and will require directional arrows indicating where the front
of house must be oriented. Frontage for comer lots is determined by taking the line length
plus one-half of the chamfer length. Cul-de-sac lots must have a minimum chord lengfu of
40 feet.
14. Lot 3~ Block 3~ does not meet the minimum square footage of 8,000 square feet or the
minimum chord length frontage of 40 feet. Adjust plat to comply with ordinance.
15. Land surveyor is required to sign. stamp and date the face of the final plat.
16. The design of drainage areas shall ensure that water is retained only during 25-year storm
events for a period. of time not to exceed 24 hours, along with Landscape Ordinance
requirements .
17. Add "City of Meridian" to the situ&te statement on page one of the plat map.
18. Please add or revise the following notes:
4. All lot and boundary lines have an adjacent permanent...
...each side of common interior lot lines~ five (5) feet.
10. The owner of each lot, across which passes an irrigation/drainage ditch or
pipe, is responsible for the maintenance thereof, unless such responsibility
has been assumed by an irrigation! drainage district.
11. The bottom elevation of house footings shall be set a minimum of twelve
(12) inches above the highest established nOrmal groundwater elev(i!ion.
19. Applicant shall ensure that building footprints for 2,100-square-foot homes with 650-
square-foot garage can be accommodated on these lots with the required building setbacks
for an R-4 zone.
20. Label the Real Point of Beginning on the face of the plat.
21. Include the Eight Mile Lateral easement area within Lot 4, Block 3, depict the appropriate
easement for the Eight Mile Lateral on the plat, and include said easement line type in the
legend.
22. Put the domestic water service origin notation in the Certificate of Owners.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All street signs~ road base, street ligh~ pressurized irrigation syste~ domestic water system
FNll-015
,'/"..,
"3
SWen.ParkSub.rp
Mayor and City Council
September 14. 2001
Page 4
(activated :fire hydrants) and fencing are to be installed prior to applying for building permits.
Landscaping and pathways shall be installed prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy.
2. In accordance with City Ordinance 12-13-8-1, underground year-round pressurized irrigation
must be provided to all common landscape areas on site. Applicant shall be required to utilize
any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a
secondary source. developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the common
landscaped areas. Applicant shall submit irrigation performance specifications in compliance
with Ordinance 12-13-8-2.
3. Two-hlUldred-fifty- and 1 DO-watt; high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider1s
expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
4. Submit compaction test results to the Meridian Building DepartIIl.ent for any lots receiving
engineered fill material.
5. All irrigation ditches; laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance
12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be
approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed
from their domestic service per City Ordinance Sections 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 . Wells may be used
for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
7. Five-foot-wide sidewalks and pedesti-bm walkways shan be providedUi accordance with City
Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K.
8. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee' s "Final" approval letter for
the Subdivision name, lot and block numbering, and street names. Make any corrections
necessary to conform.
RECOMJMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the application, with the comments noted above.
I'P.ol..olS
I)
il If
u
t!JI
Sla!ertl'rukSub.fp
,
January 18. 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22. 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO.
REQUEST Aire Manufacturing Water Main Easement Agreement
~ 3~H
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See attached
~
u\J(f ~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this :!L day of 0(...+ , 20 Kbetween /I :2 It) I<... J L. ~
the parties ofthe first part, and hereinafter called the Grantor, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises
and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be
constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the
Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a water
main over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line
and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto
repaw-and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such
facilities at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, itfs
successors and assigns-forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties
hereto, that after construction, making repairs, performing other maintenance or
making subsequent connection to the water line, Grantee shall restore the area ofthe
easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such
construction, repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for
repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this
easement that was placed there in violation of this easement.
THE RIGHT GRANTED to Grantee herein to use the easement is not exclusive.
The Grantor, its successors, assigns and agents shall each have the right to use the
Water Main Easement Page I
revisedEASMT2. WT R-Meridian.doc
limitation, the right to landscape and/or pave such easement parcel, provided such
use does not unreasonably interfere with Grantee's use of said easement parcel.
THE GRANTEE SHALL, to the extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend and
save Grantor, its successors, assigns, and agents harmless from any and all claims,
ability, losses, costs, charges, or expenses which Grantor may incur as a result of
any act or omission of the Grantee in its use of the easement parcel under this
Water Main Easement. If any action, claim or demand is made against Grantor for
any act or omission of the Grantee, the Grantee agrees to assume the expense and
shall pay all costs, charges, attorney fees, settlements, judgments or other expenses
incurred by or obtained against Grantor.
IN THE EVENT ofa breach hereunder by any party, the non-breaching party shall
have all remedies available at law or in equity, including injunctive or other
equitable relief. In any suit, action or appeal there from to enforce or interpret this
Water Main Easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its attorneys'
fees and costs incurred therein, including reasonable attorneyst fees and costs
associated with any appeal proceeding.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, large trees or brush within the area described for this easement,
which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lavvfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawfUl claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
Alan arnilton, Member
Water Main Easement Page 2
revisedEA S MT2. WT R -Meridian .doc
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada j[~
On this if day of 0 c/o~ , 200 I, bete me, the ~ed, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared A- A/'- l!zr b v.... ,
known or identified to me to be a member, of the limited liability company that executed the
within instnunent, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year fist above written.
(Clte ~
T ARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing 00 c:",e- ("]:1) at .
Commission Expires: '? > OCr :2 ro J
r~~-~!l.:ot"'~^~~~+
i DALE C. OLSEN j
, NOTARY PUBLIC $
~ STATE OF IDAHO f.
~'("C;+:'~1/!1Il~~f!.'J!i/I"',~"",~~
Water Main Easement Page 3
revisedEASMT2. WTR - Merid ian.doc
EXHIBIT "A" -
An easement for the purpose of water service located in a portion of Lot 2, BLock 1, of
Elliott Industria! Park Subdivision, located in Section & QfTownship 3 North, Range I
East, Boise Meridi~ Ada County, Idaho and more described as follows;
Commencing at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2, thence along the southerly line of
said Lot N61<rS8'02"W a distance of 195.96 feet to a point, thence continuing along said
southerly line N65014'OI"W a distance of21.31 feet to the scuth.....esterty comer of ~aid
Lot 2, thence leaving said southerly line and along the \vesterly line of said Lot
N00022'03 "E a distance of 228.73 feet to the POINT OF :?EGn-n~iNG~
Thence continuing along said westerly line NOO<r22'03"E a distance of2Q.OO feet to a
point;
Tnence leaving said westerly line S89038'OO"E a distance of 12.71 feet to a point;
Thence parallel with said westerly line NOoo22'03"E a distance of383.34 feet--to a point;
Thence S89038'OO"E a distance of20.00 feet to a point;
Thence paranel with said westerly line SOoo22'03"W a di.s"wuce of233.01 reet to a point;
Thence S89"38'OO''E a distance of 10.00 feet tQ a point;
Thence parallel vvith said westeriy line SOoc22'03"W a distance of20.00 feet to a point:
Thence NS9"38'OO"W a distance of 10.00 feet to a point;
Tt:lence parallel with said westerly lme SOQo22'OTW a distance of 150.34 feet to a point;
Thence N89038'OO"W a distance 002.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 8521 square feet mo.re or less' and is subject to all existing
easements and rights-of.ways of record or implied.
CQ1603 t_ wtr_ee.se~n!_!~~.J OO! Clprni
...- ;
f'-=~'~~""~'-l'
'oUI 11It..J:.~Ul.""3
arl;)VNNla
1
I
I
,
t
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
i
j
I
i
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
1
Q;l I >:
=~! i!
r..i~~ ~~
:s- w .
~ '~;5!
ffJ Jn~ji
z ~i!!!
< ~ Ii~~~a
~ !::I
1Y. ::' Ii..
~ li:l! ~!
-< M i
IJ:; ~
t
i
7
t
~
!if ~
21 E ~ r v" 1\ II
~1!Hdq~~
tJ j~hH~H
gill II : ~
~ ~ , J u. v i
-. f f i I !
t r- ~~~
..L"""'::iOI ~ =~......:a ~ :EI-i.........'^'^-
I~N , C -, I n E3 3 "" "'" '" S ,e, ~ '
~
. -
I
J
,,~ r
-............ .;:.
;'JI'!
<~~8;---" - h ....
4r..~o-:'::--" ;
."--...-.~
~ .
I
I
]
'j~
~ '-
. a
.J
;.,.
...,
~J
....
a~
~I
~I
""I
,
I .
j &
;. I ~
9. I IJ
~~ I ~
b.,-I"';l r r.I
! . h
j~
II 21 i f\
II ~ g :!I / f '::!
u $I ~I I ~~
~ ~ ~l e. ,8
~ ~ ~ ~; r i Ii
II ~ 11. ~ i II ;
I ~ \1.,,' I
~ i . ~ f-f r ~
~ ~r)1I~;
~ ~!g Il:a!
I ~ ~i Jr ' ~!
II ~~N~: f (I
! k. ~ ~i / I ;
; ~ ..~JI J.l "
I H ~~l ~I ~ j :
I ~ l . .....iJ, I
i~!lll
' '\,;JJ'
I , r I
f-------------+ i
I ! :
Ii'
I J
I s~ I
-" L
I
,
.,
I
,
,
I
ii
"g-~
!l ..
:i
~
I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
f I
/ I
i ,
I
I
I
I I
I . /
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
r t
I I
I I
I J
J I
[ f
I f
r f
r t
r I
l I
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Commission Expires:
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
.'
.' .
Water Main Easement
Page 3
EASMT. WTR.6270 I
January 18, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO.
REQUEST WWTP Generator Installation Project - Change Order No.1
~ ~ 3-(
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See attached
~
(jUff
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
DATE: January 9. 2002 ORDER NO. 1
CONTRACT FOR: WWTP Generator Installation Proiect
OWNER: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO
TO: Custom Electric, Inc.
(Contractor)
You are hereby requested to comply with these changes to the contract plans and specifications:
Description of Changes In This
Change Order (list separately)
Loose connections in MCC7
Control wiring
Repair cut wires
WAS VFD work
Blower wiring and operations
Installed counters
Removed HOA's in MCC
Remove concrete conduit entry in Mech. Bldg.
Relocate exstg. 3" conduit for genset
INCREASE
in Contract
Price
"
Sum of Increase and Decrease:
Net Change in Contract Price:
$ 90.00 $
$ 962.91
1<.",
$ 2,387.77 '/>
$ 651.57:. ......,..,...' ....
$ 180.00 '/ ........'....i
$ 646.52...\<.....................\\
$ 151.32 '...... ....
,,"'> .., ...
$ 839.60 ..'......'.... .......'....,.... ..........
$ 339.75...,.<........
.,.... '
...'0....... ,'. ....
$ 6,249.44.>.// i. $
$ 6,249.44
JUSTIFICATION .(attach supplemental documents):
Unforeseen site conditions.
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE:
Original Contract Price:
Previous Change Orders Number none
Contract Price prior to this Change Order:
Net Increase of this Change Order
Contract Price with all approved Change Orders:
DECREASE in
Contract Price
$ 141 ,977.00
to Number none $
$ 141 ,977.00
$ 6,249.44
$ 148,226.44
1
CHANGE IN CONTRACT Tltl.,~:
Original Contract Time:
Previous Change Orders Number none
Contract Time prior to this Change Order:
Net Increase of this Change Order
Contract Time with all approved Change Orders:
30 days (6/29-7/30/01}
to Number none Q
30 days (6/29~7/30/01)
Q
30 days (6/29-7/30/01)
This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CHANGE ORDER LIMITS BY CONTRACTOR
The increase or decrease in Contract price and/or Contract time stated in each and every Change
Order shall unequivocally comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the
CONTRACTOR for the work or changes ordered by the Change Order. By executing the Change
Order, the CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments
represent full compensation for all increases or decreases in cost or the time required to perform the
Contract as a whole arising directly or indirectly from the Change Order, including costs and delays
associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or
ripple effect on all other non-affected work under Contract not changed by the Change Order. Signing
of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in Contract
subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of
this Change order constitutes an agreement between Owner and CONTRACTOR that the Change
Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that CONTRACTOR will waive all rights
to file a claim of the Change Order after it is properly executed.
All Change Orders shall include a written record, submitted by the CONTRACTOR, that states the
basis of cost amount, including time and materials data, that enables the Owner to determine the
necessity and reasonableness of the Change Order.
Recommended By Engineer:
DATE:
Printed Name:
Approved By:
CONTRACTOR
DATE:
(Signature)
(Printed Name)
(Title)
OWNER
DA TE:
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest
William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk
Approved by City Council:
2
Custom Electric, Inc.
2800 WeSf Idano 8/I'd.
E/lunelt Idano 83617
Pllone' 208.]65.2700
Fa.. II: 208.J65-2768
CO #01
#2994
Merdlan Vl/\NTP Generator ln5lell Pro act
TO: City of M&ridlan
33 East'ldahO
MGrldfan, 10 83642
Phli, 2~922.5500
Serv~ Ci!lU' Tt Irten Loo~ Connections In MCO 7
Merellan Waste Wa16r Tre3lmenl Plant
Au uisl31 2001
coo:.._ orr, c..~
08/01101 ~ 08106/01
Pflm 8. MUWrlfll.
RfF. HO. nl1. UNIT DEStlllnlllll PllIC( EACH o\IoIoUNT
.
- - .
. - -
- - .
RootDl, Mlroo," C & Other Tolol parts & motr1nl1l8'
RCf No. on. U"il. I ll~~lpt:.n ~8Ltiun~ AtllOlIll!
D 01 [T"'Ck Cna~(I S5.00 -
0 mll6S I 0.36
Labor Trn/mnllll. m1Wlr;O. & ot'lor
SeI.1ec Pm~" H~Ur; Unit; ~ R..w/Utiil 1u"''""1
- -
Russell S 1.00 rug 'r~I""'..." t QUN C-o...ro!l::':'ONl ."1 J,lcr. , 08101101 . 45.00 45.00
RUMell S. j 00 reg ~ : ~ll-a~ 1,..C4..... ~...'l.oIo':'Il"'''''.. ,"" uc...:... ' oelO~IO.l 46.00 45.00
i
Tomllaoor:: 90,00
Total Amount: 90.00
/?Io~:tt! "'...~ j;OlIr .~fct ~.bfo, It:> 'ClImm EIrtd1k:. In., .
AU ,~." ~ ~t J{) o.y~. II1l ihliJllm plY mcntl'l_ ~ llOCI'Utd On 'II ~ dull ~s
JM!JI~ ~~ ~
COMMENTS
Sorv;c", Call' TighlOn Loolle Connections in MCC 7 :
~ I Blower~' 10 h~v. 1001.; COIlll'Ol wllll /lo noot3s lOOelD 1n81B11OlI
-
Page 1
5EP 24 '01 1~:35
208 355 2768
PAGE.C3
Custom Electric1 Inc.
2800 WP.51 Id~ho Blvd
[mm<:ll. IcJdhu B36 '7
Phon..; 201J.J(,J.UOO
fall #: 20l'rJ('5--276B
CO #01 - tn995
TO: City b.f Meridian
3:3 EMt)dllho
Merldlar', 1083542
Ph;\!' 2~922-5500
L_:
Service CIlII.
Control Wirin
IrwoICClOate:
P.O.
War!\: D~IO:
A \JoI31.2001
"""'" """""'"
07120101 . 07130101
PDIU & Mn.rtIJIs
REF. NO. OH. UNn O<SCRII'TION rmCE EACH AMOUKT
-
400 ell SPST R9IlIv'. 2'.<< 8578
400 en OPST R~layo 1&.10 82.BO
4000 1\ ~ 8-2 Belden C.~1e O.~ 10 00
400 ell Hl-2 1/2' CGBS HS 19 B4
1000 e.a hn Wire NUl> 014 140
1.00 9a JumP'lr!lM 500 101M '00' ConUl1ou. 10.11 lB.'l
- - -
RitntMI "'UHf. &Oth", To/al fmrf.J II. IOOtMgJs' 1a7 a1
REf. 'I.. art. Un., u"ll.Criptioo flalftlUnil Amounl
0 eo TruCK Ch-sr~ 35.00 -
0 mlee 0.313 .
.
Labor Tatel ro<'I/ni. miloage, 8. OlhfJf
$ql'fit'Q ""nn Hours: Unlit ~CJipnqo R.mtllmt A<l>>l.I11
TlmV. " 00 rQ{J C.~Dl 07120101 . 46.00 18000
Russell S 400 re<J Dd' ~~I""'JlII'Q ':0 ~os 07120/01 4500 18000
RUllSltI1 S a.DO rll9 W~a~C~mn~nm'R~~ 07123/01 . 4600 13500
Tim V 3.00 re{j Ct'n\.(j): 07123101 45.00 13500
Fl.iASell S. 300 r\lg V'~""'d .n Fi44w 07130101 45.00 13500
"." . rO~/llJoor.' 765 00
Total Amount: 962.91
I!I"~. m~1r8 yoor chad< ptlY8blO /(J -C_ E~. /"" .
A" Inlll)/cM...... dvo....r JO ~I'" 1~ ~ per'lflOntl ~ ~ tICf:fIJ8<J M or! pMI r/vo /"""",,"
.h..:~~
COMMENts
I ""'" co> _: C" ",1\""...
Page 1
s=~ 24 '2: :~:3~
208 355 2758
PCiCiE.~C:
Custom Electric, Inc.
1800 Wes! Idaho Blvd,
[mmell, Idaho IlJC" 7
Phone: 208-365.} 700
FJX II: 208-365.2768
CO #01- #3024
TO: City of Meridian
33 ElIst i~
Meridian. 10 e3642
PMt: 20a.IlU2-11S00
..ti
SeN/<:e Ca~, Reolllr Cut Wiras
IlnvoJoa Dlili):
W.O, .. .,.
IWoII( Data:;;
ALKlust 31 2001
.
0B/091D1 .08123/01
~J,./fto.JlJtQr.
Pttrnr & MafN1i1ls
. ~.." .
RfF. NO. orr. UNIT DEaGllIPTlllN . .., rAU:E EAG" . AMQUNf
. - . ! -
160.00 - 2" SonoduJ. ~c PVC , 0.52 0320
200 - Z' Sellodule 40 PVC 45Doo 1.70 340
2.00 - 2' PvC Coupt1noo \ M~ 0.92
200 . 2'. PVC FTA 063 1.26
2.00 - ...' GRC 00'. 8.26 166]
1000 21'GnCC~il B.Z2 62.20
100 2'" LB v.1CCMlr & G.Il_~ , <lB.lla <18.89
1.00 ]- LL Wi eov., " Oa,kw 48.6'9 40.69
1.00 . 2- L.R W/C<NollI G~..~~ ~.OO <\.BOll
11100 2' E/.IT 2.40 24 aD
4.00 2' SO COM 3.&5 14.60
960.00 a1 THIiN 0.56 ~ 37 80
320.00 ~TflHIi 0,2e 119.60
320.00 >16 THHIi 016 ~7.GO
- - -
Rontgl, NfIfODfJ II & Ot/lor Tt;lID/ pofUJ 8. mo/erltl!t1.. 1.037.77
RE~.1(.. aT'\'. UnIt.o Oo:mc rbl t.,., , Rl'lolUnit AIlItu\ t
0 OU True<<. Chlrgt 35.00 -
0 mil..o 0.38
, -
L.bor ,.10111 1'11"/,'1 ~. &. olh<lr -
~,Q"'''''J'' II=UI1 u.~. Ol3tTipJion R.t.t1\Jnit .w.um
- -
RuUitll S ] 00 reg ~.....~-l;_. 0610&/01 01600 00.00
RhllnW '100 rug n...........,_ O!lfQllIO 1 45.00 9000
Ruuell S. J SO rill) A'b4'1' w 1NI~u. 0611 !/01 4500 15750
RhettW. 250 /ell Pn,l.;,::.u:VolI..w 08115/01 4!.00 112.50
Ruanll~ S 600 I'lIQ Jt.pN:'J.:r.MNI. OBlZO!01 45.00 lao 00
Brllndon J. 4.00 "'Il ~rCU:~MY1 {)S120/01 45.00 160.00
Ruaoe~ S. 300 r&g ~,c.............. 0l!I;l]'01 46.00 136.00
Srnnd()(1 J. 300 AID ~fe..'!;IM..... OS!2Sl01 , 4~OO 13500
ROOll W. 300 rag ('I~~l.a ....... oamro I 4500 lJS 00
J.".ed J 300 '''g ~1':tJ.,^,l'" 08/23'0 I 4500 13500
-
ToIIlII.bOl: 1 3~0 00
Tot<lll Amount: 2387.77
~ nro~1l ro"' crec~ "..y.1lhI to 'ClIm>lI' !;!c>dric. Jnc .
M In'-'Oloo9 I)lfJ 1hIt.' M! 3D /;lion IN 1111"* jJ<IJr mlJll/h ..w 00 I:JCCnJftd on ,,~ In""""j
~ll~'~ -..LtIl1IIl1~....--~
COMMENTS
r- Co" _: R'e'" co, W'm.
P"go I
SEP 24 '01 18:35
208 355 2758
p~GE.i?5
.... ....... ,
~I~ I.; U r I
Custom f/ectricJ Inc.
.!6UO West IdJho BllId
EllIme((, Iddho 836 11
{'lIone: 206.365.2700
F~,oIIJ: 208.365.2168
CO #01-
#3025
TO: City ()f MGridian
33 E~eOdElho
Meridlan,lD 63042
Phf:2~22.5500
Servlc>: Call
WAS vFO Worl\
Au lilli 31. 2001
to'4h- eMJ UIM
0810 1 1 - 0612210 I
PrIm IJ, MDtetWlQ
". ~
REI. NO. Ory. Ill/IT DfS CllII'TXI H . . .. PflICf EACIf ulOum
. .
10.00 rt 1/2" 6MT 0.3B 3.80
600 rt 1 n" UQuld 1'100< 1.99 9.95
400 ea 112'" Uquld flo~ eoO&groo 3.00 15.64
15.00 ft Oold"" 1I1 fl.2 ec,.,,,,,o\Qr 3,:38 SO 40
1.00 (>1\ ~ P~S s..~ 29.04 2904
100 ell 1000 0 HMS P~orootIJr 137 20 1372B
1.00 Oil ~l<l DiC or P8 Endo,ua '<<1028 4626
. .
. .
F<<MtDl, M;'/Xl~ e & Othar Tafel pDtt~ 8. mmrl,,1S 291.-'7
AU.Ho. llH. Uniu I OIw:ll~liIl<1 IblollJlllI A~U'1
0 e.a IT.Udc CMfgQ 35.00
0 mll!lS [ O.3B
uoor Tal", re"ts!, miJofJge, /I. alhe<
S~..iPl PIll ~n H."~ $ I I,fni" DnIltfiP\!qo RalltiUnll AmlullI
\'00 ! .
RU5Uell S nm ..toOtJf-l'l: iIIl WO 'o'l:lt$1:..e' p..;t'm)tJ......lrt" '$..~ ~c;r."., w"om, we 06/01/01 46.00 4500
.klrrod J 1 SO I reg rm~l~ Pv1.I~r<I....llt.u" & !!:j.c::o,.. :,:.....cn 0'\ 'ff1lD ,""",""t1 """0 06/2.2f0 1 45.00 67 50
Jerrod J 050, ct ....,..1....q ~~~~... J t-LKtan ~::... ~w.,,'" ~pWO Olll'22/0t 67(;0 3375
TOdd A ,
, 00 ! reg I ;"I.u~ll -t 1?11II"\t1) "",""f""'r.I""h'F7\ l'J:It WA9 "">='0 09J22Jll t 4S 00 ~soo
Todd A. 2 $0 01 Id'".C"I:l' ;\ m:J~u~re'Itt:J..~"'~tWA.SVFO OS/22J0 1 !S7.SO 1681S
Tot.l/lsOOr 360.00
Total Amount: 661.57
~~'"-
COMMENTS
"t" . ~ , '.. Ii
I'tuu m.ikro YOll1"cIl/Jdl pay/lblo fa 'CiJ/I/oIn E__. I{)C..
M I~ "'" _!llJI 30 D~, f'lll\ ~tI ".rmonlh vtlD b., erxroed an aU pur CllJ/J Jnvok>i:$.
-~- .. --~----
,
SONk;c C~J:. WAS VFO Worle;
[Nola: Nnd now fl'lB1or llt>d VtIO Vl'D & ProartlmlTllld) .
.
Page 1
SEP 24 '01 10:]7
208 3:":5 2768
=>AGE.06
........' J
Custom Electric, Inc.
2800 We;l Idaho Blvd,
"rlmel!, Idaho BJ611
P1Jo'~: 208.365-]700
1',1)/ 1/: 2083652768
co #01
:/1.3046
TO: Cflybf Meridian
33 EM(~d6'ho
Metldl3i\, lD 83642
Ph*!: 2ri~922-5500
Service Call, HelD RooematVWlth blower wilinaand operation
Meridian Wa$~-Wa'er Treatment Plant
IInV9iooDllte.
!PeD. .:..
IWOfk Dite:
,
Auauo131 2001
c.-
.OSf2BI2001
PP1'tS I. MlueritJl6
IU;f. NO DrY. UNIT DESCRlf'T101I , fflICE EACH "101000
. -
. - . -
-
- .
Ronr.tl, MllfNJtJe 4. Oth(}r T~I NI15 &. ~ri;J1$:
~Er. N). orr. Ullla ~tion .. Rato/llail An>lI.1
0 ea TruCl\ Cllllrge .:Iii ,00
0 m!llll 0.35
lAbor Tot1Il/'MIlll, mlle/HVI.. & olMr
s..r..t~ PlllCon ~OlJI$ \In!ll lll\1t~pt>on ROle/U<>it Amoun!
- -
T O<ld A. 04.00 'll9 H..t'.;:::t.,...tl'UIry-''''''''~'''''''I'IlJ!l-I'I(jO'j)lllI~ 06/26101 46.00 1 eo. 00
- .
ToJ"lIffOOt: 1eO.00
Total Amount: 180,00
~I.:J'::'~il:'Wi.:':;!~"> .(,~~ '~~ifff;:;~"1~++";a.5u"~!' ~ ,p."~~ ;.!p ~.k\ ;.:..~::"; ~_l~~_~~: .,:; :~i ~',': :~I/, ";:~. .">~:'~~tt..,J" /I~C."'':':~.\ ~.."" # ...."JJ I I"' .,/. I t, III ~"~''':A:~
#,IUN "",ko row clIfJr:A ptJyar.>h> /(J .Cu'fI>m 1:.1<<:Iri.. I".. .
AU 1(l>tOk>ltlr Il<U dli$ J>Gt 30 O'yi. ,"" w.,,,,,,r P'I'monrh wlH b~ /tCCi1IIfd Otl.n puttJu. imtr>IC<I~
COMMENTS
S<lMCllCnII Help Rosemary wi' h blower wlrhlc- and operation
'-'eridlan WaGle Wole1 Trub'l.nl f'(~nl
-
Page 1
SED 24 '01 10:37
208 355 2768
:::JAGE".07
Custom Electric, Inc.
2800 Wes[ Idaho Blvd,
Emmert Idaho 836 I 7
Phone: ZOIl-.)65-2700
Fa" 1/: 208.36S.276f)
Co -:t!:: t -
-Jnvolee !1:J062
TO: City (,f Meridian
33 Ellt.t~daho
M&rldl\1l1. 10 83642
?II#: 208-922-5500
~t
SeN\olr C:!Ill: Looked lit Control Wirl & IntIlalled Counters
Meridian W3'Ste Willer Tre3tmant Plant
mber 26. 2001
0..-.
08116/0 1 - 08126101
~rts & I'hferlats
REF. liD, 1lO'. 1Il1lT Df~CRIPT10N I'llIC'EU.c<< ~LlOllP(T
- - -
4.00 QQ COUMenI 00.38 241.62
- : - -
. . - .
Rem2l1, MIINa. &. OdIw , rot.1/ parts & m<Ji9ri~: 24t..52
lIEf-.~. nTI. ltnit! O<t;triplion Ili~LWI lunDunl
0 ~ TruCk. CI'1afll/l 35,00
0 mil&!l 0.38 .
.
lAbor ! r013/ rent.tl. mIIBo_. & om&r
S.Nlea hre4n H~\lls l.kI;l8 Dootrlptiln Ilalll/l1nit Amoum
. - -
Ru5S1!l1l S 1.00 r"", ~.ed ~ CONti WIrlf1S:: 08lHilOl 4500 45.00
Ruuell S 4.00 re(} LntIl.l~ CoYr.t..1\. OBI2!!101 . 45.00 lBO.OO
DenniB T 4.00 reg lhltlill-Ifd COOnDH'S. 08128/01 45.00 100.00
- .
Tolallabor: 405 00
T oml Amount: 646.52
-..
COMMENTS
; ~ ~2 H ~..::.~r.l+1..ii:~+'\
~~ _". ywr Cf>C(k Pf)'t~ /0 'ClJStlom e'-':bic. Inc.'
An /(I~ ".. 00.. I>I1t Jt) iiIi!ll.$/"" moll!1l win I>f ~ 0/1 .n ~ du& invoIctRJ.
~ ,I ~
S9l'\IlcI'I r::.an: looked at Control WIrtnQ &. Installed Lounl&r8
J.lOrldlan Waall! Wlllar Treal/llOr'll Plan!
-
Page 1
SEP 29 '01 16:53
208 365 2768
PAGE. 03
Custom Electric, Inc.
2800 West Idaho Blvd.
Emmett Idaho 8)617
Phone: 208.365-2700
Fax /I: 208-365-2168
Co4l
-In\-.O i ce
1J3063
TO: Clty~f Meridian
33 easr:ld!lho
MGrldlo(., ID 836-42
Ph#: 2.Oll:-9.22.{i5QO
,L
S€lvlce ell>>; Removed HOAG In MCC
M6f'1dJan Waste Water Treatment Plan I
Se tember 26. 2001
~
09105(2.001
F'urtl:s & MlJterl8k/
REF.HO. ary. UNIT nESCRIP'llON .' PlllCH.4.tK AMOUNT
- . .
3.00 M HOA !llDnJ<.o 5.44 16.32
. .
. . .
Remsl, MIIeIK. e " Oilier Total pIlrts & matoti4lo: le.32
Ra'. NIl. orr. Unlu ao.>crlpllOn R.lmlllllit .l""""ll
0 ail Trudt Chn'llB 36.00 .
0 mile" 0.:l8 -
Li1bor Total rMI/IJI. mI~. & ~f
SarYlCIll'lltElll" IIours UMJ) De=i;IIlcn flamlUnil ArnmInI
. . .
Ru-'IS 3.00 reg Re~4,l-t.,:J.I.IlI:'l-UCe 09fO~ 45.00 13500
-
ThrDI Wier. 1;)G.00
Total Amount: 161.32
~>> _kt> yQlI1"ch..ok ~b1a 10 "C=m EI&ct1f<;. Inc.'
AHJnwIC&ulO l:lIJO IltI~De~. f""~parmD;J/h I14JJba 1l<Xn.I&d"".!(ptJ.JJdJ>>J ~~
~.~
CDMMENTS
:;".~~1 ~~':' .~.<". I ~I ":~:;.:', 'tt'~il . . II t 1 t"
Sal'o"loa Cell; RemQvijO HOAs in MCC ,
. MOf1dlllt1 WllSIe Wlllllf Troolm8n1 PranE
.
.
Page 1
SEP 29 '01 16:53
208 365 2768
PAGE. 04
Custom Electric, Inc..
2800 West Idaho Blvd.
Emmett Idallo 836 r 7
Phon.:: 20f>.J6S-l700
F~x It; 208-36$-2769
CO #01 - 113004
. ,\
TO: Citypf Meridian
33 Eallt;ldaho
Me:rldi3~, ID 8~2
f't1:D: 108-922-5500
~i
S&Nfoo Can: Extra - Break oot ConCl'llt9 Sial> In Fron of Mech. BuIldI
& mOOr 3. 2001
_"""'w......
01f03l01 - 07mS/01
Port1J &. N/1furl(}/l)
Ill:~. 110. OlV. UNIT DEUIllI'THlII PIllet: UCIl AM DUST
- . -
- . - -
- -
-
RfmtIJl "'"8QQ (J a: ottrer : T~I pq~ '" mtJrorlrt/;s; .
REf. No, On'. UniIo ~ fhJ~ -l!'EIunt
-
0 ell Truek ChlI"", $5.00
0 u O.3lI
1 6a Rental JtI.Ck Hllmntl/f a Comp~~ 1 64.60 164 60
Labor TOUl'rorrwl, mJlfJf1OO. .& o/fIQr 164.eo
SuTYiu I'OO;tIn l\aot'~ llnII& OawIo!lo/1 RlttAAilt hmotm
. - -
Srnndon J. 4.00 reg ~ out CorQ'1m U'tD In 'ftll'l'f<< W.l:IIl~~1 !hll:dl~ 071ll')101.. 4G.00 180.00
ROOllW. 4,00 reo ~ Q..rl CcrtUtSM 'SI:tDI.r. Pl'h"<<of "'lC'\a~ "~l$rC 071OJI01 16,00 180.00
8nInoon J. 3.50 ~ ~OUtGOl"~(t:40j)rnp:o"'Q'1'Iot:fl:lll'tCTl.o'lll;C'l""'\.;!Ir"fJ 07/00/01" -IS.OO 157.60
R~W 3.60 reg ~o...'tQoftmta CLTll'",-r'IClfTI;"~"fI~"II:III,o~ 07/05101. ~S.OO 167.SO
- .
rQfull~ 875.00
Total Amount: 839.60
-~:wv
COItfMENTS
I_G~_:
B_.t",...",_,__
'.~~.,li~;'>'-"q~~''"':. '~-d""~\"'~'"t~~~^'I~~" .~.'.',::,' ': t.~1 ~.~.. 'fi~ * .:,,,,:..:,.~I...;'
floaoo mok() yoqt' ~ Pll~ lI:l 'Cl!Sfom EInIne. Inc. .
AS 1!IVOIcn.~ ow nn ~ = Nlliiiif' mot'I/1Il/dO /)(I ~ 9fl.JI (}(Ut~ I~
Extra - Breaking out ConCl916 Slab In Fron of Mach. BuIlding
Page 1
SEP 29 '01 16:53
208 365 2768
PAGE. OS
. Custom Electric, ./nc.
2800 Wt!st IdJllO 8M.
Fm,nctt. Icf.:lho 83617
PhOM: XJ8..J65"2rOQ
Fax 1/; 208.365.2768
CO #0 1- #3065
TO: Clty~f Meridian
3:3 E~Il(lr.d\'iho
~.:" IIDD 83642
Ph#: ~t-S500
. ,,\{ ~
~ CoM: JC ~UUtlloff Misaed El 3~
.,.
Sa
bar 3 2001
~Cft'JtIIft
Pe &~Is
rfs ,
IlfF. NO. arr. lINT OESCAIl"I~ mIce UCl{ AMOlJtlT
- - .
1.00 ft 3'" p,.tC 9ll!:leO:OO Elbow 24.75 2.\.7!\
. . . : . -
- - . '. . -
~..Afl/HfJ. & Oihv ., TolD! ~ &, mQ/oti~ls: 24.75
IIEI'.No. tlTl. l/lm llo!lCrijl1.lon R/lllIIUlIl! Al1lO!Jl\l
.
0 etl Truck ChBTge i 35.00 -
0 mllei 0.36 .
LAbor , To~1 ntrrml. m~, & Othllf
StIVict PMmo HliUl'I tk1ru iloIl:/ilIilon Rmf\lM Amoool
. . -
RU9~1 S. ~.oo rog ew~J".;a" 4!f.DO l~!.OO
Jerrod J 2.00 r'Eig ~~ ~1500 00.00
.Nrrod J. 2.00 reg 'Eilll.~ ~15.00 00.00
.
Toftll/oOOr: 3H'i.OO
:
Total Amount: 339.75
.::" '~~.I:j' /.~ I '~~..:;:: ;'1 ',Ij-".'"' ~::":'~I'I', I . .~ ~ II: .i
COMMENTS
'Pr-,,;.,~ J'lW,c:/t<l'Cl\:~1lr 'Cl.oJfDm l!1&cbIc. roc'
AIIlfT~'." cw. ~ JIJ Iii' .11i~P'f IhOIIIh 'ftI1t ~ ~ on all p<m tt.o8 ~o.
'-'l.illJ V"
99fV~ COlI. JC COMltruclion Mis9ed a 3" Pipe loto Gllnerator 5l.1lb
.
-
Page ,
SEP 29 '01 16:54
208 365 2768
PAGE. 06
January 18, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 22, 2002
APPLICANT Public Work's Department -- Gary Smith ITEM NO. 4-8-2
REQUEST WWTP UV Disinfection, Grit Basin and Outfall Project - Award of Construction
Contract
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See attached
vJ-/
evrF
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Y)
w
E
...I
(3
<(
u.
Y)
~
0::
o
~
Cl
<(
w
::c
>
:::l
l.1..
ZQ
~Z
Co
cci=
WUe
:iE;:)~
l.1.. 0:: <<:i
o l;; t-
>-Z'"
!::: 0 ~
UU~
:-.
'"
'"
<>.
E
o
u
Cl
<=
.~
LU
<::
... 0
-d,);
O'IU
'" "
- ...
Et;
.: 5:
u
~~
o '"
~ ..
e~
-t::
<= 0
8~
~
2
U
e
c
o
U
U
-,
..
G;
E
E
'"
...
I-
:-.
'"
-'"
E
::I
I-
1::U)
~...J
o
N
on
co
0>.
<r
<r
t..ONCO N 00,.....0
te--i.01.Or-Ov
rr>No.)Nt;")......N
0(") LOCI)Vro
~-~~:;~-~.~-
V,.--q-Nt'-;--o
'"
1n-.cn-u:.EA-tfl-V)(,')
o
o
a
o
o
06
M
000
000
LOoci
.....00
~~~.
M<r<r
0000
0000
1"--000
r.n a a to
a"'.....
00- (01- ~.,..:
NN
....
o
a
a
a
a
0'
M
U}U}(I}U)fhrJ)-if)
0000
qC!.oa
;:~~g
-t"{ f"... {"')~ c::o
'V ({) m (...,r
C\lN'I"J"T"""
000
000
aNd
a 0
co. to m
"IT N-' N
~ ~ ~
'"
lIJ.w.U}t.<9-~W(R-
0000000
00000.00
cicic:iaodd
0000.000
o_o_oo~o_oa
U1 0. to 0 .0 .....: tJJ'"
(\t("}VN"'I"'""
a
o
a
o
a
0'
M
'"
WU)oU}-EI)V)WU)
a
a
on
<r
~
v'
0000000
0000000
ciodricide
0000000
O..lOO.OOOl.O.
ll)aO~~CD.N("')
(\It")U)l;"J-.-,-
v>
W(I) (,?-U). (I) "'l>t.h
a
a
a
a
o
oD
N
0000000.
~aaoooo
1"-~oodcici
1J)"'=tOOOOo
lXJ_oooc.oa
~ ;- ;{ ~i ~ N~ ;:
'"
&t vt €A- (I) fIJ. (I) 4A-
U)U)U)<J)<J)U)<J)
..J-J..J....J..Ji.....J....J
:;;
'1:
::I
..
~
<5
fi"'"
~i
.., '" ...,
~;;; ...
~~::-:;;~
~ ~ ffi ~ ~ U)
Cl<l)Kcu~
.&.~.SJg2~~
a::HrMUi8~
zzU)-g8~~*"O....(J)
gg~;~ ~.~~ ~~~
0.;500 co l1J m 'E ~O:J
t2 :J 5: ~ ~ rr:: a) g: '.~_ ,~_' 13
U - 0 - <:: ';:: ';:: ;; <(
U)gj<(<nC)C)C).!:~~u.
~~~~:Oo=tJmpOi~
ci
~
::!:~N
UJ
1::
gg;:~~
:gRg~~
OC'I C\I.I.O. 0 Mp
-.n.~ M ~ M
(lI)~-c.olh';lotfifhtn
00000.00
0000000
lCocioicioo
LOOOMOOU')
COLOU'>.OO_lOf'o...
l()-N.om.~Ltl.~
'" Ii) M
(R.U)EI)U)U)~(f)
000
000
Lriadd
",<0'"
<0"''''
'>D~.o~
0000
0000
aoco
0-000
o (\I 1.0. -q'.
o~rc-vm
ON
~
U]o-(/).U)-U)-tA-tA-1n
ggggggg
~ggggg~
QJoo.qOOT""
m(:t'J.~g~flO-::
-fI)(I)-U)Vfr.ff-ffl(J)
00
00
U":to
",a
<0'"
l(). co.
00
a a
dci
a a
~. ~}
<'> M
00
a a
DO
00
0'"
w. ("'f
",V>
(/)0000.(,0')-
0.000
0000
u-;go(d
~o_S;_~
u)'" ~ ~ g
o a a
000
000
000
~~~
N ~
U)WEflUlU)(I)U),
C/}C/}U)U)(J}<J)(f)
-1-.J-I-I....J-J...J
..,
OJ
ro
a:
c
OJ
E
a.
.@. ~ ~
~c ~ ~
:;; E ~ u
~ "S ~ ;f
.~~ "~~ ~
~> "~~ -cffi
:;;=>~o....., ~I-
cog-g5U)0J~UJ
3: <=:> OlOJ OJ ~
O.2~OJ-c:ii7ii-5l-
<:::!i! o=C)Oz
oI9o~~~gW
~.s8~~U)~i
-ro-:O-u=owc'61tt
M
a a
o '"
'" m
<r .....
"'_ CO
"'N
o N <r
a..... .....
LriNrti
~~~
((J. to" r.n-
~
<0 '"
00>
m..n
<D
.....-"-
No'
<r -
(/}-f/)-lI')(h(.l}-""l-Vtw
000000
000000
cia~tvir--.:d
OOtnOT'""O
I.()L()NID.r--.U1-
tn. i'--~ co. oo~ ~h
N
WWU)-(.I)(A-WVlL9-
000000
000000-
c;r)Ooomo
t--.Oooaa
,..., 0.00 (:(J......
a 011)- CD- m~......
NN_
""""""'V)(,IJ.Wt.o')b9-fh
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
0' CD'" 0- I,D- In-
... ~
tI'} (1)-(1) (I) (I)-(.9-.f.q.Cf).
000
000
ocio
000
0.00
1.0 r--." cD
-
000
000
ood
a 0 a
"'00
rri rtJ.- ",-
~
Yf.WU)oU}U)-(I)WU}
0000.0000
~~ddci~~6
T""oaaoono
r-aOOtOLl)MO
gM"N-~-u? ~~-
u:l-U)-tI-}~fhlZfl(fl4J)
U)U)C/}if)U)if)(J}C/}
-1....J-I-I....J....J.......l'...J
:;;
;;;
~
..., <=
(;) .2
3: ro
S [J) 00
Q}'[Ea....,w
:2.- ~z
..., .., 0- ::I 51::i
g ::I.., 0-:> W
>m:E~QjIDo..
~~g~~5~
g ~ .~ ~ -~~ ~
UC/}:2U5CO:2l:i
iiD'U'Sdi"e"o
<r
0",,,,
avo>
cr)~oq
"'''''''
M M V
10. ..n ID~
<D v
000
o a a
ddc
a 0 a
~-~~
~ co v
'" '" .....
(O"ltNU)O
O.c:o:r--.<q-N
uo}"'I:J'"OMT"""
mNCO,....v
6.~:-~-~-
M M
&')- (,I)- (,I) U} .:.q.
00
aC!
m<r
;_R
NN
"'<r
00000
("')000'0
a)ci~ccio
~~ror.o..g
('t")C}.,.....- ...,.
M ~
i;) .(I) W L9 CA-
00
a a
dci
00
0"'.
oDv
~ N
00000
00000
~;;~g~
co ('\J U] I.D .,....
~r--.. o-
M N
U]o Co? lJ) (I) (i)
0-0000
'00000
06000
00000
6d~.~~
M ~ '"
tn L') UJ. U)- of/)
00
a a
do
a a
00.
o'co
1'-M
00000
00000
ccidoo
OOCoo
001.01,{) l()
o 10- M c...t oct.
M ~
(l)4'hlhUJo~
00000
00000
aecido
00000
o l.OO 01.0
co. N 0- (....,r .
N _
U)(A.b9-0(.f7f.f.t-
U)(J}U)if)tf)
....J-I....J....J...J
CD
<J)
~
rn
o
o 'E
:2 ..
tt: [
~ ~
~ g>
<J) -0.
i:i E
~<J)t?...,
ow..g
i=t=:o:>
;ii Er~ ~
~i1~g
ti~J58
00-
o-z
U)
...J
o
0::
I-
Z
o
()
a
z
<(
...J
<(
()
~
I-
()
UJ
m:Qu6'Qi'"uj
'"
OJ
>
m
>
'"
'"
~.>:~
_!OO <5 ~
t~:;;
- ~..c::
~~6
~ d d
.. .., ..,
05~~
1OL/")C\lv
(O["")NM
r.DtO(")c:r,;
0""'''<1'"0
N - '"
v"'~"" v~
I,,()("']MOQ
VNC'\tOJO
Na.ON~O
-N(:"')r.DO
~.~~~~
~ ~ N
"9-W(l)LI?v)(A.W~"fl
0000
0000
0000
OOl.OO
OOf"'-..r--
~ ~: ",i -
00000
00000
Mm..nr;...;O
'lO"tTr---l.OO
01 N ~ ("J 10.
o. N o. m T'""
N('I")'V"""'N
U)U)WWU)U)CI>i&9-U'l
000000000
~~~~~~~~~
r...-q--01~CD('I")C\lNO
~~~.~+N:~~~~_~
- ~ N
W-V)Wb'JoE.I'J-fh(l)-fI)-U)
0000
0000
0006
0000
OLOLOO
.......- (Dk v. ('\I~
-
00
a a
ci 0
a a
",_a
~N
~ N
000
000
ood
000
a)00
. m- 1tJ'"
N
"9-tI-llfl"-Ru) (l)U}rH'h
000000.0000
000000000
000000000"
000000000
OlOOLOO.OI.()OO
l4']-iDui. r:J:J~NiDN
....... .,- T""'" N
~lhifl)U)-~VJoll'JiflU)-
000000000
000000000
a;;u:iddIDc:Ou:i~ci
t-...NOOOCOOJNO
..q-r.o.OLOID~(ONO
rn-.-oer.NM"r--.- ~T'""kN-
~ -
ifR'(,'J(/) (/)-(/) "9-rfl(l'}(IJ-
<J)<J)C/}C/}(J}<J)<J)(J}t5
....J...J.....J.J-J...J....J-Jo
'"
<:
'"
o
~ E
~ ~ ~
f! c 0:::
CD ~- ~
'" ~ ~ -
~-~:'l 'E
<~~~Cl') 0_"
-:S~cE uez
tI) ~ - ;;;:, E.:J
~~~~ a lj 00
8&i~~~UJ~~r
G~~~_~efij~~
~~B~~t:010
g~~..,iij~~~~
U:E-o~!aJg:2~::J
11I&-~Ouca.G
~w~>.gw.!!!!E>_2
-c;()=>>lIl -:>
~~~~:l!!5~~~
m~ouQi'c:cn2~
<0
.....
~
~
'"
..,.
0-
.,..
<0
~
o
~
...
"
I
~
....
o
M
en
'"
a
uf
M
....
...
o
<:>
...:
'"
0>
m
N
.....
...
o
."
Q
a
a
uf
a)
...
...
:5c:E-
ciO~~
OC:-m
1l)_~o-:S
~"i:g~
"':S:",~
-"'U
~~~
1--00
....-ooz
a
a
...;
'"
""'
eO
....
..,
....
~
UJ
...J
=>
a
UJ
:I:
U
if)
o
00
...J
~
o
I-
o
o
ci
a
a
o
'"
'"
....
1!!
'"
E
0;
w
E
'"
..
<=
C,
<::
LU
0>
CITY OF MERIDIAN
ORDINANCE NO. 02-937
AN" ORDINAN"CE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 847
BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILL NARY
AN ORDINAN"CE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 847 TO AMEND SECTION 2 OF CHAPTER 5 OF TITLE 1
OFTHEMERIDIANCITYCODEOFTHECITYOFMERIDIANPRO~DING
FOR THE DESIGNATION OF THE VALLEY TIMES AS THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND PRO~DING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
SECTION l:That Section 2 of Chapter 5 of Title 1 of the Meridian City Code of the City
of Meridian, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-5-2: OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER: The Idaho Statesman Valley Times
printed and published in the City of Beise ~, be and is hereby
designated the official newspaper of the City of Meridian, and such
ordinances, notices and publications as are required by law to be
given publication in a newspaper shall be published in said Idaho
Statesman Valley Times. (Ord. 847, 10-19-1999)
SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 3= VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any
section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein
be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that
it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination
herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid.
SECTION 4: SA \lINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an
action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance takes effect.
Ordinance for official newspaper for Meridian - Valley Times
1
SECTION s: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect January 30,2002, after its passage, approval and publication, according to
law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
22nd day of January, 2002.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
22nd day of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
../ .
/'.- - ~ ... . . oJ? 7 .... .....
t.: / "[1'll,~d ~t.&.tU(-----..J
,\\\1'\':~'\~';.::q,tXCo il President Tammy deWeerd
..,)\"-{ _()'b..;i"~Gu,ng mayor)
,.::-' 0 ~.~~" >'..;':.;..t'i' _r,...,~
..::: (., ol'l,?CJr.li ~"P~'"
,-. . ....() I'A' "c,
f; ,"V 'Q, ":'"
,. -, .. . _ {;" n'~~ j.~ ' '-.,' -~r
Jtat.&---'.P~ f ~.. ~'i!i"l.L . !;
W.ll. G B J C k - 1': ""'"
1 lam . erg, r. - lty er ~, ((;~" ~~: / . r
--'. ....,.." '~-, ~:t "\., '.0.. '"
or fl~ '" <",.., A "." _._.~
/....<>, '-, '.' r i~', . 'J' ...:
. ..~.<: "'."'. ..' \:)~~;.<,:
/- 22-- () 2- . . '.,.\'
--'.-.._!;'
First Reading:
Adopted afte~~ rea
~
by suspension of the Rule as allowed by Idaho Code 50-902:
VL.-.P --- 1- - tJ 2-- No .--
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
z:\ Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Ordinances City Hall\2002 ORD\AmendOfficiaINewspaper2002.doc
Ordinance for official newspaper for Meridian - Valley Times
2
Sharon Smith
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
legals@idahostatesman.com
Sharon Smith
Thursday, January 31,20029:25 AM
Return Receipt (displayed) - Please publish ASAP.
ilj."""'")'.
. "._^.,'..",'
'~:s-~;,""
MDNPART3.TXT
This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
legals@idahostatesman.com.
Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.
1
rage 1 or J
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith [smiths@cLmeridian.id.us] on behalf of Sharon Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 31,20029:15 AM
To: 'historydoc.@uswest.net'; 'Iegals@idahostatesman.com'
Subject: Please publish ASAP,
Shat-OYlI 5 JIJ-"Liitv
Ve:pu:ty C{j;y Clerk--
P'1v. 888 -4433 e-,ct: 210
1/31/02
Page 1 01'1
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith [smiths@cLmeridian.id.us} on behalf of Sharon Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 31,20029:17 AM
To: 'historydoc@uswest.net'
Subject: Please publish ASAP
Shcu-OYlI S YJIlit;}v
Ve:put:y C U;y Clerk,t
pht. 888 -4Lf.33 e,d; 210
1/31/02
"'* TX:
~IRMATJON REPORT "''''
32
DATE TIME TO/FROM
Ial/08 23'09 3810160
AS OF IAN 08 '0;
10 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MODE
EC--S
MIWSEC PGS
00'47" 001
CMDll STATUS
e28 OK
t !.etL.re- j>~S f ~ ,Pkb/ic. I/oh~ M~j"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NEW PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND ADJUSTMENTS
Tho City Council 01 the City of Moridian will hold" public hearing on Tuesday, Januory 22, 2002 at 6:30 p,m, in the
City Council Chambers at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Idoho Avenuo. Meridian, Idaho. The purpose ofthe publlc heariog
is to receive public comments regarding imposition 01 new tees by lho Public Works Department TM fees are
necessary to cover tho cosls oj development application review, inspections, sile plan and development plan reviews
thot ore presenlly not baing recouped, Also included Is a reduction 01 the sewer main inspeCtion fee.
The new Md odJusted fees are as follows:
Commercial or Industrial SIte Plan
UtilitV Plan Review
With no now water or sewer mains (.ervlces
I.\xlslill9)
W~h no nBWwater or sewer mains (services not
existing)
Wrth new pUblic waler or sewer mains
Drainage Plan Review
" 1.5 aer<ls
1.5 to 10.0 aCtBs
10.01020 acres
:> 20 acres
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water Of sewer mmns
New water main
New slWier main
Drainage System IIlSpllction
" 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 SCfes
10.01020 acres
:> 20 acrllS
SUbdivisIon Plans
AAl1ilXation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned UniI Development
Preliminary Plat
Waler System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System Modoling - by Consullent
Sewer System Modeling - by Publlc Works
Sewer Syslem Modeling -I>y Consultant
Finnl Plot
Lot Lino Adjustment
Development Plan Roviow
Off-site Waler or Sower Main Plan Review
Homeowners ASsociation Pressurized Irrigation
System RevifIW
Sewage Lift station Revlow
Privata Slr.et Review
Inspection
Waler Main Inspection
Saw.r Main Inspection (reduce from $2,31 per
IineetloDl)
Pressurized Irrfgallon Systemlnspectlen
SlfflOge Lift Stetion Inspection
InlM)
Review
ThIrd and Subsequent
Reviews
568
5102
534
$51
5:204 + $0.40 per tineal foel
5102... $0.20 per lineal foot
592
$184
$276
$552
$46
$92
S138
5276
One-time Foe
S30
Sl.00 per lineal loot
$1.00 pOrJinealloot
S30
$60
$:240
$480
One-Time Foo
S82
$82
$62
S160 + $1 per lot
$368
Time anO Materials
S368
Time and Malerials
$160'" $1 perlot
5200
$240 + $10 penot
$00.40 per lineal foot
$70 ... $5 per 101
$276
S100'" 50.10 per lineal fool
alon9 slroot centerline
$1.00 por Iineat fool
51.00 per linaallool
$150
$225
$300
$240
50 or less sa",ices
61 to 10(1 seNices
101 or more services
The public is encouraged to review the proposed fee structure, attend tho public hearing end offer comment!> and
testimony, Oral tostlmony may b. Iim~cd to throo (3} min\llos per pCl$on. Written cOOltMl\ls are welcoml.\ and !Ieed
10 b. submltlod J sent to tl1e Meridian City Clerk, 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Merid;on, Idaho 8:l642 of by f3x at 688--4218,
All matenals presented at public mootings shan oocoma property of the C~y of Meridian. The hoaling will be hold In 0
facility thaI is accessi\lle 10 pernons with disabil~ios. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabil~ies rel<Jted to
documonts and 1 or hoarings, plea.a contact Ihe City Clerk's Office at 688-4433 at leasl7'2 hoUrs prior to the public
hearing. \l\'l.l~.~ I! ....:.'.11.
""',,, 01' M:;-. ",.
OATED this 28th day of Docemnar, 2001, :f"'(f N\Poiir<'(t
g ~.J-'.. )'~"
g
PubHshed January 41h, 11th, 16th, 2002.