Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/11 Letter from Philip & Judy DeAngeli Philip and Judy DeAngeli 3405 Zaldia Lane Meridian,Idaho ~RE C ]j~ ~rVE"D ~ ~ "", "1'1):')06' .riU(), ::,',,\,' GfTY OF MERIDIAN i-:ITV r:! cpv nCF!CF Honorable Tammy DeWeerd Keith Bird Joe W. Borton Charlie Roundtree Shawn Wardle Re: Napoli subdivision continuance to August 15 Dear Mayor and Council members: Our home is adjacent to the proposed subdivision's East boundary. We have been to all hearings and have provided written and oral testimony. On July 18th the council directed the developer and the neighborhood to conduct a meeting to try to reach an agreement. The points of contention were as follows: 1. Our present neighborhood consists of Dartmoor subdivision, 1 acre lots, Kingsbridge Subdivision with 12000 to 21000 square foot lots and a variety of larger single family home sites on 5 to 20 acres. We felt that the proposed Napoli subdivision's much denser urban proposal was inappropriate for the area. The applicant feels entitled to R-4 density regardless of neighborhood impact. At the two meetings held, the developer showed three new plats. Two of them had unacceptably narrow lots like the original proposal and the third showed a little improvement to the perimeter lots but still no perimeter landscaping. After discussion the neighbors decided less density was necessary. Still the developer insists on 26 houses on 9.44 acres. The developer at , that point unilaterally ut:cided there would be no more changes. 2. Kingsbridge on our North side is providing screening and landscaping with berms and trees, As a direct result of neighhorhood input. Also, Kingsbridge includes one story homes and a 25 foot rear setback on perimeter lots which are a minimum of 15,500 square feet and over 150 feet wide. We feel this is a fair transition to our larger, county parcels. The Napoli applicant shows no desire to compromise and answers these requests with no, no, no and no. The nine neighborhood families have discussed the ultimate demise of our rural setting and have agreed that: I. We all wish to remain in our homes post any development-provided we ean retain a low density, at least R-2 neighborhood around us. 2. Several feel that Napoli as proposed and with its prominent location on Eagle road would detract from the neighborhood to such a degree that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to develop our properties in this high-end manner and still attract a market for our lots. Therefore, several folks have stated they will just sell to developers and move. Our combined properties total 93 acres and extends to Amity road. With Kingsbridge's smooth transition and our heartfelt dedication to this area, we feel this would surely surpass even the quality of Eagle's Two Rivers development. One family has spoken to a prominent (and principled) developer who states that with our water here and desire for low density we could produce a spectacular housing opportunity the city could be proud of. Please do not allow Napoli as proposed. Thank you. /3IJrQ~ ~\:W . b. \~ (j