HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-02-05
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING February 5, 2002
APPLICANT Resolution ITEM NO. /;
REQUEST Resolution - Public Work's Fees and Adjustments
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See attached
1/Y
;D1/3
e--
~
~
Date: Phone:
Materials presented at public meeHngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
I ~
~ ~;
To:
William G. Berg, Jr. ~ CITY OF
MERIDIAN
Wm. F. NiChO(!il CITY CLERK OFFICE
Resolution/Certificate of Clerk on Public Works New Fees and Adjustments
From:
Subject:
Date:
January 25, 2002
Will:
Please find attached the originals of the Resolution and the Certificate
of Clerk, in regards to the above matter. This item is now ready for City Council,
and I believe it is set for the Tuesday, Februmy 5, 2002, meeting.
If you have any questions please advise.
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Rcsolutions City Hall\2002\BergPWnewFeesAdjustmtnsO I 2502Mcmo.doc
Ey^\NPASVRDCO I\SERVERZ\WORK\M\MERIDIAN\lVIERlOIAN I 5360M\RESOLUTIONS CITY I-lALL\2002\BERGPVVNEWFEESADJ USTM
-z. /5)'-' 2. Coo ,.. Co; I
~bYl tI=(p
/1-:1 "<. ~d ec.
To: Mayor Corrie and City Council
From: Brad Watson, P.E. ~/!f ~
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk, Bill Nichols
Date: 211/2002
IRe: Public Works Dept. Review and Inspection Fees
It appears I may have mis-spoke at the public hearing on January 22 regarding when the
Public Works Department review and inspections fees should be implemented and to what
projects the new fees would be applicable.
It was our intent that the new fees be applicable to any new applications submitted after
February 28, 2002, My statement regarding projects that should be exempt from review and
inspection fees was meant to exclude from fees those projects where a final plat application
has been accepted by the City but that City Council has not yet approved. My comments
after the public hearing was closed but before the motion was made were". .. (the fees) could
only be effected to applications that came in for preliminary plat, CUP, annexation after the
effective date. I don't want to tag anybody that's got a preliminary in now."
That statement, it appears, was interpreted by some to mean that any project on a
preliminary plat that has Council approval would be exempt from any future final plat or CUP
application fees within that previously approved preliminary plat. However, there are
approximately 337 acres of Bridgetower Subdivision, 70 acres of Sundance Subdivision, and
100 acres of Cedar Springs Subdivision that have either filed preliminary plat applications or
have received approval but have not yet filed a final plat application. These projects could
contain numerous phases that may take up to 10 years to build out If those projects that
already have preliminary plat approval, or have simply filed an application, are not subject to
the proposed fees, we will be forced to track those projects that are exempt for a relatively
long period of time. Additionally, significant revenue from these projects would also be lost.
It is my understanding that the resolution adopting these fees will be
submitted to City Council at the February 5 meeting. We would be
happy to discuss this issue further at that meeting if you so choose.
From the ~ of...
Please contact me if you have any questions prior to the Council
meeting. Thank you.
Brad Watson, P.l!:.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works
D...>partment
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
walronhlG!ci.meridian.iduq
.t- ugv .l Vl J
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith [smiths@cLmeridian.id.us] on behalf of Sharon Smith
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 1 :21 PM
To: Valley Times Legals (E-mail)
Subject: Please Publish ASAP - Public Works New Fees & Adjustments Res. 02-374
Thank you!
shaYOY\.I S J1tl.i:t1.'v
Depu:ty C(i;y Cle-v1v
P'1v: 888 -4-4-33 e?d:" 210
2/11/02
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith [smiths@cLmeridian.id,us) on behalf of Sharon Smith
Sent: Monday, February 11,2002 1 :25 PM
To: Idaho Statesman Legals (E-mail)
Subject: Please Publish ASAP - Resolution 02-374 Public Works New Fees & Adjustments
Thank you!
sha.YOYV s~
Deputy Ctty Clerlv
p~ 888 -4433 e4' 210
2/11/02
r a~o;:; 1 Vl l
February 1 , 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST Approve Bills
February 5, 2002
ITEM NO.
( '1- ;/
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
\IV
Uvrf
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meeHngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 01-15-02
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH )
FACILITY IN A C-N ZONE )
LOCATED SOUTH OF E. )
FRANKLIN ROAD AND EAST )
OF S. LOCUST GROVE ROAD, )
MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
LARRY MAURER, )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-01-038
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
The above entitled conditional use pern1it application having come
before the City Council on January 15,2002, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and
Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf
of the applicant was Anna Powell of B & A Engineers, Inc., and Rod Cullip appeared
and testified with comments and/or concerns, and the City Council having duly
considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to
City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public
hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I
having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to-wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published
for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for J anualY
15,2002, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and 'written notice
having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred
feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than
fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and 'with the notice of public hearing having
-
been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said
hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and
television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly
considered by the City Council at the January 15,2002, public hearings; and the
applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services
within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full
opportunity to express comments and submit evidence.
2. There has been compliance 'with all notice and hearing requirements set
forth in Idaho Code &67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ss 11-15-5 and 11-17-
5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2
of Posting filed with the staff report.
3. This proposed development request is in a C-N zone and by reason of
the provisions of the Meridian City Code S 11-17-4, a public hearing was required
before the City Council on this application.
4. The property is located south of E. Franklin Road and east of S. Locust
Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho.
5. The owner of record of the subject property is the Corporation of the
Presiding Bishop of the Church of Latter Day Saints, a Utah Corporation of Salt
Lake City, Utah.
6. Applicant is Larry Maurer, Authorized Agenf of Meridian, Idaho.
7. The subject property is currently zoned C-N. The zoning district of C-
N is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance,
Section 11-7-2.
8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for a
development of a church facility. The C-N zoning designation within the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be
obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City
Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1).
9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is
in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 3
conditional use as determined by City Ordinance.
II. The City Council recognizes the concerns of Morgan and Marilyn Plant
and Arthur J. Berry.
12. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning,
Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian
City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the
City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area
BoundalY.
13. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the
governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning
jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will
not impose expense upon the public if the follovving conditions of development are
imposed and'the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the
proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions
providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the
City of Meridian, subject to the following:
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering
comments as follows:
I. A minimum 25.foot-wide landscape buffer shall be installed along the
entire length of the western property line (exclusive of driveways) as
required by the Landscape Ordinance.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 4
2. The landscape buffer on the north and south sides of the property may
be reduced by 50% to 10 feet, and the buffer on the east property line
may be reduced by 25% to 15 feet.
3. Applicant shall provide 10 copies of a detailed fencing plan prior to the
City Council hearing. Chain link with slats shall not be permitted.
4. The applicant shall (trust) work with ACHD for the installation of five-
foot wide detached sidewalk if available along the entire length of the
western property line adjacent to Locust Grove. If ACHD will allow a
det.ached sidewalk, then an attached sidewalk shall be done as available.
The applicant shall be responsible for working with ACHD staff to
ensure that a parkway (five-foot wide minimum) shall be installed
between the sidewalk and the back of curb. The parkway shall be
landscaped and irrigated in accordance with the City of Meridian's
Landscape Ordinance.
-
5. The revised site plan shall include sidewalks, and the additional
landscaping to bring the property into compliance with the Landscape
Ordinance (Exclusive of the allowed reduced buffers between land uses).
6. All trees removed from this property that are larger than four-inch
caliper shall be mitigated for a ration of I II: 1 II in accordance with the
Landscape Ordinance. Applicant shall work with staff and not be
required 1: I ratio but shall plant trees on 1 :25 ratio.
7. The landscape island that breaks up the single-loaded parking along the
eastern property line has more than 12 parldng spaces in a row vvithout
a landscape island; however, moving the island to the north two parldng
spaces disrupts the integrity of the irrigation plan and shall serve no real
purpose, so the easterly row of parldng spaces shall be approved as
shown.
8. An additional fee of $235 shall be paid based on the fact that the fee
paid by the applicant was for a conditional use permit only ($275) and
not the fee for a Planned Development ($400.00 + $15.00 per
additional acre.)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 5
9. Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via extensions from
an existing stub from Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be
reviewed and approved during the building plan review process.
Latecomer fees shall be assessed against this parcel. Fees shall be
collected at time of approvaL
10. Water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains in
Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be reviewed and approved
during the building plan review process. Applicant shall provide the
Public Works Department with information on anticipated fire flow and
domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Flow and pressure
from the existing mains shall be monitored vvith the Meridian Water
Department.
II. A new legal description and site plan shall be submitted.
12. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Zoning a~d Development Ordinance and/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements.
13. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth
in Sections lI-13-4.D. and lI-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
and Development Ordinance and in accordance with .A1nericans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
14. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord.557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Stormwater
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance vvith
Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into
surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6
15. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in such a manner as to
eliminate glare and illumination of the adjoining roadways and
properties, in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C.
16. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in
Ordinance 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance.
17. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
18. Trash enclosures shall meet the requirements of the Sanitary Service
Company's guidelines for location and size.
19. Applicant's (or successor's) failure to comply with any of the terms of
approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of
the conditional use permit.
20. This conditional use permit, w!1en granted, shall be valid for a maximum
period of eighteen (18) months. If construction has not been started
within this timeframe, a new conditional use permit shall be required
prior to development.
Adopt the recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as
follows:
21. A fire-flow consistent with Appendix III-A of the Uniform Fire Code be
provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an
average of 400' apart at approved locations.
22. Operational fire hydrants are required before combustible construction
begins.
23. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon
acceptance of the water system by the City of Meridian.
24. Final approval for fire hydrant location shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 7
25. All turning radii shall be a minimum of 28' inside and 48' outside.
26. The proposed annexation will have an unknown transient population
and will have an unlGlown impact on Meridian Fire department requests
for service.
27. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal.
Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is
intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request
for Basic Life Support.
Adopt the ACHD Recommendations as follows:
28. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove
Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision
plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building
permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first.
-
29. Applicant is proposing two entrances into this site. Proposed driveway
#1 is located approximately 475-feet south of the intersection of Locust
Grove Road and Franklin Road. Proposed driveway #2 is located
approximately 300-feet south of the near edge of proposed driveway # 1.
Locust Grove Road is classified as a minor arterial. District
policy requires any driveway located on an arterial roadway to be
located a minimum of 220-feet for a right-in/right-out driveway,
or 440-feet for a full access driveway. Thereafter, driveways from
a signalized intersection shall be located a minimum of 150-feet
from any existing or proposed driveway. Both proposed driveway
locations meet District policy and are approved with this
application.
30. Applicant is required to pave the driveways to their full-required width
of 25 to 30-feet and to a point 30-feet beyond the edge of pavement of
Locust Grove Road with I5-foot radii pavement tapers abutting the
existing roadway edge.
31. Provide a $8,200.00 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 8
the District for the required street improvements of approximately 41 Ow
feet of 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the parcel, prior to
District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first.
32. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not
allowed unless approved in writing by the District.
33. Meet District drainage requirements per section 8000 of the ACHD
Development Policy Manual.
34. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-
way.
35. Additionally, comply with all the Standard Requirements (8) listed
within ACHD's letter dated October 26,2001.
Adopt the Central District Health D~pt Recommendations as follows:
36. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
37. Applicant shall submit plans for a food establishment for review.
38. Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge
to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water
q uali ty.
39. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject
project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents
groundwater and surface water degradation.
Adopt the Sanitary Service Recommendations as follows:
40. Two squares at the northeast and southeast locations within the parldng
lot are waste enclosures, more specific dimensions are needed.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT w 9
Adopt the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Recommendations as
follows:
41. All laterals and waste ways must be protected and all municipal surface
drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the
site, the District l1LUst review drainage plans. The developer must
comply with Idaho Code 831-3805. Irrigation water shall be made
available to all developments within the District.
Additionally, pursuant to the action of the City Council from their meeting
held on January 15, 2002, the following shall be required:
42. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural watelways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being
subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be
approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association, with .written confirmation of said approval submitted to the
Public Works Department.
14. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all
yards, open spaces, parki.ng, landscaping, and other features as may be required by
this Ordinance; it is found that the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed
use, and all of the required land uses features. The applicant has requested reduced
landscape buffers between land uses in order to accommodate additional parking.
The adjacent landowners have submitted letters stating that they are in support of
the reduced buffers.
15. That the proposed use and development plan vvill be harmonious with
the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance vvith the requirements of this
ordinance; the Comprehensive Plan's Generalized Land Use Map delineates the
property as "Mixed Planned Use Development." The requested C-N zoning and the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 10
land use request are harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan. The submitted site
plan does not comply with adopted landscape requirements (buffers, number of trees,
sidewalks, fencing...). In order to be harmonious with the Zoning Regulations (Title
11), additional landscape design elements shall be incorporated into the site design.
16. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance vvill be
compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change
the essential character of the same area; that the additional landscaping and design
features shall be added to this project in order to be harmonious with the
surrounding uses. The proposed church building, if constructed and maintained
appropriately, shall be harmonious with the existing and intended character of the
same area.
16. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; that the requested
use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
17. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public
[aciilities and service such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any
such service; the proposed uses will be adequately served by all essential public
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - II
services and facilities.
18. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for
public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community; the requested uses will not create excessive additional requirements
at public costs for public facilities and services. Additionally, the proposed use would
not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
19. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reasons of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors; the development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions that may be detrimental by reason of excessive traffic,
noise, fumes, glare or odors.
20. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property
which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding
public streets; the proposed use will not interfere with general traffic patterns on any
public streets.
21. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage
or a natural, scenic or historic considered to be of major importance; no natural or
scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by issuance of this conditional use.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 12
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the
Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975 hereinafter referred to for convenience as the
Act codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.c. 67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and
authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the
establishment of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho
Code Section 67-6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has
established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development
Ordinance at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code."
3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing
and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional
use permits which a proposed use is othelwise prohibited by the terms of the
ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance
which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances.
4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts
and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to
granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following
standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code s 11-17-
3)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 13
a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all
yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by
this Ordinance;
b. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with
the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this
Ordinance;
c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance "vill be
compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change
the essential character of the same area;
d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public
facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer; or that the person
responsible for the establishment of the proposed conditional use shall be able to
provide adequately any such services;
f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional cost for
public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,
property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise,
smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
h. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property
which shall be so designed as not to create interference "vith traffic on surrounding
public streets; and
i. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage
of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in the Neighborhood
Business District (CkN), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 14
published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record 'within three
hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for
the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City
Code ~ 11~17~5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which
provides as follows:
"Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the
Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided
in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use
applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts
shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before
the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the
Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without
a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the
recommendation of the Commission."
6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of
the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the
Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend
that the application be approved, approved 'with conditions or denied. The
Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an
application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City
Code ~ 1l~17~6)
7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may
impose conditions of that approval that reasonably:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 15
A. Minimize adverse impact on other development;
B. Control the sequence and timing of development;
C. Control the duration of development;
D. Assure that the development is maintained property;
E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development;
F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and
G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this
Ordinance.
8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area
and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December
21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps.
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does
hereby ORDER and this does Order that:
1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for
development of a church facility in a C-N zone located south of E. Franklin Road and
east of S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of
use and development, subject to the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 16
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering
comments as follows:
1. A minimum 25~foot-vvide landscape buffer shall be installed along the
entire length of the western property line (exclusive of driveways) as
required by the Landscape Ordinance.
2. The landscape buffer on the north and south sides of the property may be
reduced by 50% to 10 feet, and the buffer on the east property line may be
reduced by 25% to 15 feet.
3. Applicant shall provide 10 copies of a detailed fencing plan prior to the
City Council hearing. Chain link with slats shall not be perntitted.
4. The applicant shall (trust) work with ACHD for the installation of five-foot
wide detached sidewalk if available along the entire length of the western
property line adjacent to Locust Grove. If ACHD will allow a detached
sidewalk, then an attached sidewalk shall be done as available. The
applicant shall be responsible for worldng with ACHD staff to ensure that a
parkway (five~foot wide minimum) shall be installed between the sidewalk
and the back of curb. The parkway shall be landscaped and irrigated in
accordance with the City of Meridian's Landscape Ordinance.
5. The revised site plan shall include sidewalks, and the additional
landscaping to bring the property into compliance with the Landscape
Ordinance (Exclusive of the allowed reduced buffers between land uses).
6. All trees removed from this property that are larger than four-inch caliper
shall be mitigated for a ration of 1 ": II! in accordance with the Landscape
Ordinance. Applicant shall work with staff and not be required 1: 1 ratio
but shall plant trees on 1 :25 ratio.
7. The landscape island that breaks up the single~loaded parldng along the
eastern property line has more than 12 parldng spaces in a row without a
landscape island; however, moving the island to the north two parIdng
spaces disrupts the integrity of the irrigation plan and shall serve no real
purpose, so the easterly row of parldng spaces shall be approved as shown.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 17
8. An additional fee of $235 shall be paid based on the fact that the fee paid
by the applicant was for a conditional use permit only ($275) and not the
fee for a Planned Development ($400.00 + $15.00 per additional acre.)
9. Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via extensions from an
existing stub from Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be reviewed
and approved during the building plan review process. Latecomer fees shall
be assessed against this parceL Fees shall be collected at time of approvaL
10. Water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains in
Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be reviewed and approved
during the building plan review process. Applicant shall provide the Public
Works Department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic
water requirements for the proposed site. Flow and pressure from the
existing mains shall be monitored with the Meridian Water Department.
II.A new legal description and site plan shall be submitted.
12. Off-street parldng shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements.
13.Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in
Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans "vith
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
14.A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer
is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord.557, 10-1-91)
for all off-street parking areas. Stonnwater treatment and disposal shall be
designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997
publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho
Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site
disposal into surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has
authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approvaL The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessalY applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 18
15. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in such a manner as to
eliminate glare and illumination of the adjoining roadways and properties,
in accordance with City Ordinance Section 1I~13-4.C.
16.AlI signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Ordinance
11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance.
17.AlI construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
18. Trash enclosures shall meet the requirements of the Sanitary Service
Company's guidelines for location and size.
19.Applicant's (or successor's) failure to comply with any of the terms of
approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of the
conditional use permit.
20.This conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximU111
period of eighteen (18) months. If construction has not been started
within this timeframe, a new conditional use permit shall be required prior
to development.
Adopt the recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as
follows:
21.A fire-flow consistent vvith Appendix III-A of the Uniform Fire Code be
provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an
average of 400' apart at approved locations.
22.0perational fire hydrants are required before combustible construction
begins.
23.Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon
acceptance of the water system by the City of Meridian.
24.Final approval for fire hydrant location shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 19
25.AlI turning radii shall be a minimum of 28' inside and 48' outside.
26.The proposed annexation will have an unlmo"Wli transient population and
will have an unknown impact on Meridian Fire department requests for
service.
27.The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal.
Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended
to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic
Life Support.
Adopt the ACHD Recommendations as follows:
28.Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road
abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or
execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first.
29.Applicant is proposing two entrances into this site. Proposed driveway #1
is located approximately 475~feet south of the intersection of Locust Grove
Road and Franklin Road. Proposed driveway #2 is located approximately
300-feet south of the near edge of proposed driveway # 1.
Locust Grove Road is classified as a minor arterial. District
policy requires any driveway located on an arterial roadway to be
located a minimum of 220-feet for a right~ill/right-out driveway,
or 440-feet for a full access driveway. Thereafter, driveways from
a signalized intersection shall be located a minimum of 150-feet
from any existing or proposed driveway. Both proposed driveway
locations meet District policy and are approved with this
application.
30.Applicant is required to pave the driveways to their full-required width of
25 to 30-feet and to a point 30-feet beyond the edge of pavement of Locust
Grove Road with I5-foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing
roadway edge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 20
31.Provide a $8,200.00 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at the
District for the required street improvements of approximately 41 O-feet of
5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the parcel, prior to District approval
of the final plat or issuance of a building permi t (or other required permits),
whichever occurs first.
32.Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed
unless approved in writing by the District.
33.Meet District drainage requirements per section 8000 of the ACHD
Development Policy Manual.
34.Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-
way.
35.Additionally, comply with all the Standard Requirements (8) listed within
ACHD's letter dated October 26,2001.
Adopt the Central District Health Dept Recommendations as follows:
36.Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
37.Applicant shall submit plans for a food establishment for review.
38.Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to
the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality.
39.The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project
shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and
design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and
surface water degradation.
Adopt the SanitalY Service Recommendations as follows:
40. Two squares at the northeast and southeast locations "vithin the parking lot
are waste enclosures, more specific dimensions are needed.
Adopt the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Recommendations as
follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 21
4 1. All laterals and waste ways must be protected and all municipal surface
drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site,
the District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply \vith
Idaho Code &31-3805. Irrigation water shall be made available to all
developments vvithin the District.
Additionally, pursuant to the action of the City Council from their meeting
held on January 15,2002, the follovving shall be required:
42.All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural watelways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being
subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4~ 13. Plans shall be
approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the
Public Works Department.
2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian
City Code & 11-17-9.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant
shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a
conditional use permit.
4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit
111 accordance vvith this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk
and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning
Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~ 22
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City
of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 6 7 ~6521 an affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance
or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty~eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter
52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
day of ,&6tutf.--f-!f, 2002.
ROLLCALL:
[;;"11-
COUNCILMAN WILLIAM L.M. NARY
VOTED$A..-
VOTE 0*"-
VOTED$!:-
VOTED-*'-
COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD
COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD
COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE Mc CANDLESS
---
MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DATED: 'Z ~Z;;; -02.-
MOTION: h\
APPROVE~
DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 23
Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works
Department and the City Attorney.
J,'~~~'.~~~"'~L~,...,\;,.,~,.:",
.> v'k' !'!)rl'" e .'" "'1/.
2' (_i.fP,.,.... OJtl(t2, "J'
2 / 0-tJ Z-",~,: I' " t':t,,:"'1 {lr ". '.'
~ .,.... ",._.rJ
: \ "9, /... j
:'.' '. ": I ,i .~
'.: -rJ. ""~" .' " ~
~~.' ,:.,.- ". ';-0 .~ ::'~ ".,d___.r""'
BdI~~~ ~
City Clerk
Dated:
Z:\Work\M\Mcridian\Meridian 15360M\LDS Church AZ-O [-019 CUP-O I -038\FfClsCUPO 1-038.doc
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 24
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 01/15/02
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH )
FACILITY IN A C-N ZONE )
LOCATED SOUTH OF EAST )
FRANIUIN ROAD AND EAST )
OF SOUTH LOCUST GROVE )
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
LARRY MAURER, )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-OI-038
ORDER GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. This matter coming before the City Council on the January 15,2002,
under the provisions of Meridian City Code S 11-17-4 for final action on conditional
use permit application and the Council having received and approving the
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the
following action:
2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for
development of a church facility in a C"N zone located south of E. Franklin Road and
east of S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of
use and development:
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-O 1-038)
- 1
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering
comments as follows:
1. A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape buffer shall be installed along the
entire length of the western property line (exclusive of driveways) as
required by the Landscape Ordinance.
2. The landscape buffer on the north and south sides of the property may
be reduced by 50% to 10 feet, and the buffer on the east property line
may be reduced by 25% to 15 feet.
3. Applicant shall provide 10 copies of a detailed fencing plan prior to the
City Council hearing. Chain link ,vith slats shall not be permitted.
4. The applicant shall (trust) work with ACHD for the installation of five-
foot ,,,,ide detached sidewalk if available along the entire length of the
western property line adjacent to Locust Grove. If ACHD will allow a
detached sidewalk, then an attached sidewalk shall be done as available.
The applicant shall be responsible for worldng with ACHD staff to
ensure that a parkway (five-foot wide minimum) shall be installed
between the sidewalk and the back of curb. The parkway shall be
landscaped and irrigated in accordance with the City of Meridian's
Landscape Ordinance.
5. The revised site plan shall include sidewalks, and the additional
landscaping to bring the property into compliance vvith the Landscape
Ordinance (Exclusive of the allowed reduced buffers between land uses).
6. All trees removed from this property that are larger than four-inch
caliper shall be mitigated for a ration of 1 ": 1" in accordance with the
Landscape Ordinance. Applicant shall work with staff and not be
required 1: 1 ratio but shall plant trees on 1 :25 ratio.
7. The landscape island that breaks up the single-loaded parldng along the
eastern property line has more than 12 parldng spaces in a row'without
a landscape island; however, moving the island to the north two parldng
spaces disrupts the integrity of the irrigation plan and shall serve no real
purpose, so the easterly row of parldng spaces shall be approved as
shown.
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-038)
-2
8. An additional fee of $235 shall be paid based on the fact that the fee
paid by the applicant was for a conditional use permit only ($275) and
not the fee for a Planned Development ($400.00 + $15.00 per
additional acre.)
9. Sanitaty sewer service to this site is being proposed via extensions from
an existing stub from Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be
reviewed and approved during the building plan review process.
Latecomer fees shall be assessed against this parcel. Fees shall be
collected at time of approval.
10. Water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains in
Locust Grove. Main sizing and routing shall be reviewed and approved
during the building plan review process. Applicant shall provide the
Public Works Department with information on anticipated fire flow and
domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Flow and pressure
from the existing mains shall be monitored with the Meridian Water
Department.
II. A new legal description and site plan shall be submitted.
12. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements.
13. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth
in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
14. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord.557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Stormwater
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance with
Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into
surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-O 1-038)
- 3
over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessaq applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
15. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in such a manner as to
eliminate glare and illumination of the adjoining roadways and
properties, in accordance "vith City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C.
16. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in
Ordinance 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance.
17. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
18. Trash enclosures shall meet the requirements of the Sanitaq Service
Company's guidelines for location and size.
19. Applicant's (or successor's) failure to comply with any of the terms of
approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of
the conditional use permit.
20. This conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum
period of eighteen (18) months. If construction has not been started
within this timeframe, a new conditional use permit shall be required
prior to development.
Adopt the recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as
follows:
21. A fire-flow consistent with Appendix III-A of the Uniform Fire Code be
provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an
average of 400' apart at approved locations.
22. Operational fire hydrants are required before combustible construction
begins.
23. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon
acceptance of the water system by the City of Meridian.
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-O 1-038)
-4
24. Final approval for fire hydrant location shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
25. All turning radii shall be a minimum of 281 inside and 481 outside.
26. The proposed annexation will have an UnlGl0Wll transient population
and will have an UnlGl0Wll impact on Meridian Fire department requests
for service.
27. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal.
Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is
intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request
for Basic Life Support.
Adopt the ACHD Recommendations as follows:
28. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove
Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision
plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building
permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first.
29. Applicant is proposing two entrances into this site. Proposed driveway
# 1 is located approximately 475 -feet south of the intersection of Locust
Grove Road and Franklin Road. Proposed driveway #2 is located
approximately 300-feet south of the near edge of proposed driveway # 1.
Locust Grove Road is classified as a minor arterial. District
policy requires any driveway located on an arterial roadway to be
located a minimum of 220-feet for a right-in/right-out driveway,
or 440-feet for a full access driveway. Thereafter, driveways from
a signalized intersection shall be located a minimum of I50-feet
from any existing or proposed driveway. Both proposed driveway
locations meet District policy and are approved with this
application.
30. Applicant is required to pave the driveways to their full-required width
of 25 to 30-feet and to a point 30-feet beyond the edge of pavement of
Locust Grove Road with I5-foot radii pavement tapers abutting the
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-038)
-5
existing roadway edge.
31. Provide a $8,200.00 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at
the District for the required street improvements of approximately 410-
feet of 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the parcel, prior to
District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building pernlit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first.
32. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not
allowed unless approved in writing by the District.
33. Meet District drainage requirements per section 8000 of the ACHD
Development Policy Manual.
34. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-
way.
35. Additionally, comply with all the Standard Requirements (8) listed
within ACHD's letter dated October 26,2001.
Adopt the Central District Health Dept Recommendations as follows:
36. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
37. Applicant shall submit plans for a food establishment for review.
38. Stonnwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge
to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water
quality.
39. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject
project shall obtain current best management practices for stonnwater
disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents
groundwater and surface water degradation.
Adopt the SanitalY Service Recommendations as follows:
40. Two squares at the northeast and southeast locations within the parking
lot are waste enclosures, more specific dimensions are needed.
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-O 1-038)
- 6
Adopt the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Recommendations as
follows:
41. All laterals and waste ways must be protected and all municipal surface
drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the
site, the District must review drainage plans. The developer must
comply with Idaho Code S31-3805. Irrigation water shall be made
available to all developments within the District.
Additionally, pursuant to the action of the City Council from their meeting
held on January 15, 2002, the following shall be required:
42. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being
subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be
approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the
Public Works Department.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the
applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application
for a conditional use perntit.
4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable
without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code S 11-17-8, a copy of
which is attached to this permit.
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-038)
- 7
P^-
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
r- ft
day of ;:e6r-U[I./101- ,2002.
o e t D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works
Department and City Attorney.
B~~~;je7~ fJ.
City Clerk
Dated:
-Z-~-{}2-
Z:\Work\M\Meridi<ln\Meridian 15360M\LDS Church AZ-O 1-0 I 9 CUP-O I-038\OrderCUP.doc
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-038)
- 8
...;;'~-""
lI'.{ ~l' """""
'~A~
Ada County Highway District
Judy Peavey-Derr, President
Dave Bivens, 1st Vice President
Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner
David E. Wynkoop, Conunissioner
318 East 37th Street
Garden City ID 837] 4-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail;tellus(a?ACHD.ada.id.us
January 28,2002
RECEI'TE1)
JAN 3 U 200'2
Corporation ofthe Presiding Bishop
ofthe Church of Larter Day Saints
50 E. North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84150
City of Meridian
City Clerk OfficE-
Re: Staff Level Approval-REVISED
MCUPOI-038/MAZOI-019
160/190 South Locust Grove Road
Church
Facts and Findings:
A. The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff has received the above referenced application
requesting armexation and rezone approval for approximately 4.25-acres from RUT to C-N
zoning. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use approval to construct a 24,120-square
foot church. The 4.25-acre site is located on the east side of Locust Grove Road approximately
475-feet south of Franklin Road. This development is estimated to generate 210 additional
vehicle trips per day (10 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual.
B. The application and site plan stamped and received by the City of Meridian on October 13,2001,
and submitted to the District on October 18,2001, has been reviewed by the ACHD Planning
and Development staff and conforms to applicable District standards/policy, or can be made to
conform with the change(s) to the plan described in the requirements stated below.
C. This is a staff level approval and will not be heard by the ACHD Commission unless the site plan
is changed in such a manner as to not conform to District standards/policy or an appeal of the
Planning and Development staff decision is submitted as described within the Standard
Requirements outlined below.
D. On October 22,2001, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and
evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On October 26,2001, the staff met as the
District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development
on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts
and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements.
$:\DSTECH\CU\200 1 CUP\MCUPOI-038, MAZO 1-0 19 .sla.doc
Page I
E. For the purposes of estimating daily trip generation and assessing impact fees for this project, the
proposed use of this development has been classified as Church. (Per the ITE Manual) The
impact fee rate from the fee tables for this use is $485 per thousand square feet of gross building
area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. Note: This rate is provided for
informational purposes only and shall not be construed as an impact fee rate certification.
The impact fee will be assessed at the time of plans acceptance by District staff, and shall be
based 00 the fee tables and provisions of the District's Impact Fee Ordinance in effect at
that time.
F. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting
Locust Grove Road. This segment of Locust Grove Road is in the District's Five Year Work
Program for temporary repair in 2004 and widening in 2005/06. In lieu of constructing the
improvements, the applicant should be required to provide a $8,200.00 deposit to the Public
Rights-of-Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on
Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 410-feet) prior to issuance ofa building
permit, or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first, OR the applicant should be
required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road located 2-
feet within the oew right-of-way, and provide an easement to the District. Coordinate the
location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff.
G. The applicant should coordinate with District design staff, regarding the need for any additional
right-of-way and easements associated with the Franklin/Locust Grove Road project.
The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval:
Site Specific Requirements:
1. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel
by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to
issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to
30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material.
The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-
of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of
application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with ACHD
Ordinance #193. The right-of-way purchase agreement must be completed and signed by the
applicant prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs
first.
2. Applicant is proposing two entrances into this site. Proposed driveway # 1 is located
approximately 475-feet south of the intersection of Locust Grove Road and Franklin Road.
Proposed driveway #2 is located approximately 300-feet south of the near edge of proposed
driveway # 1.
S:\DSTECH\CU\200 1 CUP\MCUPO 1-038, MAZOI-O 19.sla.doc
Page 2
Locust Grove Road is classified as a minor arterial. District policy requires any driveway
located on an arterial roadway to be located a minimum of 220-feet for a right-in/right-out
driveway, or 440-feet for a full access driveway. Thereafter, driveways from a signalized
intersection shall be located a minimum of ISO-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Both proposed driveway locations meet District policy and are approved with this application.
3. Applicant is required to pave the driveways to their full-required width of25 to 30-feet and to a
point 30-feet beyond the edge of pavement of Locust Grove Road with IS-foot radii pavement
tapers abutting the existing roadway edge.
4. Provide a $8,200.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund at the District for the
required street improvements of approximately 4IO-feet of 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
abutting the parcel, prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building pennit
(or other required permits), whichever occurs first, OR the applicant shall be required to
construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road located 2-feet within
the new right-of-way, and provide an easement to the District. Coordinate the location and
elevation of the sidewalk with District staff.
5. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact ACHD's Utility Coordinator at 387-2516 or 378-6258 (with
file number) for details.
6. Meet District drainage requirements per section 8000 of the ACHD Development Policy
Manual. Contact District staff at 387-6170 for details.
7. Any existing irrigation facilities should be relocated outside ofthe right-of-way.
Standard Requirements:
1. This decision of the Planning and Development Supervisor may be appealed to the Ada County
Highway District Commission by the applicant or by another party within 15 calendar days
from the date of this report. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be
reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a
substantial hardship or inequity. The request will be heard by the District Commission at an
evening meeting within 20 calendar days of the District's receipt of the appeal letter. The
appellant will be notified ofthe date and time ofthe Commission meeting.
2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action
shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within two days of the
action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall
specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of
data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request
for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting ofthe
S:\DSTECH\CU\200 1 CUP\MCUPO I -03 8, .1vfAZO I -0 19 .sla. doc
Page 3
Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified
of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard.
3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in
accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact
Fee Ordinance.
4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An
engineer regist~red in the State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approvat, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements ofthe Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
7. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to-comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans,
or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
S:\DSTECH\CU\200 I CUP\MCUPO I -038, MAZO 1-0 I 9.sla.doc
Page 4
Conclusion of Law:
1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the ACHD Planning and Development
staff at 387 -6170.
Sincerely,
e.~
Development Analyst
Planning & Development
cc: Project file
Lead agency/City of Meridian
Chron
B & A Engineers
Anna Powell
5505 W. Franklin Road
Boise, Idaho 83705
S:\DSTECH\CU\200 1 CUP\MCUPO 1-03 8, MAZO 1-0 19 .sla.doc
Page 5
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 5, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 20
REQUEST Tabled from January 22,2002 - Discussion of City Seal! Logo
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See previous Item Packet
~~yrv~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the CIty of Meridian.
iDAHO
~
~c
SN-reR . , \:--4
0/ 11t~ TREA5UP-€- "-J f'V"'./
crrY OF
eridian
iDAHO
v
II
o SINce
. ) ~ 1903
h
/y.(2
CS
N7'ER ~--t
0/ Ihe TREA5UP-€. "-J f'"
j
1',
CITY OF
eridian~-
IDAHO
~
~c
l2tvl'e:Ft f..--{
tYrh" TREASURE V~
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
~
~C
l2tvl'e:A f.."'i
tYrite TREASURE V~
'\
)
OSINCE
T( ~ 903
crfY OF
))
1'/1;:
C
StvT'E ~~
R 0/ /h~ TREj\Su?''€- ...; ~
,
I
P.
.
crrY Of ~
eridi;n~;;
\DAHO
- .....
~~
~
I,
~
}
OS\NCE
.- ) \'1893
~
'l::C
StvT'ER ~--t
0/ lh~ TREj\Su?''€- ...; ~
,
1
P.
~I;:
CS", '
IYT'E ...; N.Y~""
11 0/ /h~ TREt5Uf'..'€- '
~
,,:~r. ,
:.....,..~..";'\
.",,'~!
OJ' f!~i\ij -
CrrY Of ~~,:- _...~. '--"
- " -~---~- .'"""'- ~.
eridiaii~.~/~~~
IDAHO J
I
9
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
);
.....~
OSJ\I
l'eA '\. 1 !\.\J..-€.-i
<Yt'Ir~ TREASURE Y.
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
~
'&c
SJ\ll'eA u.-€."'I
<Y t'1r~ TREAsuRE V."'-
- .....~,
~
)
q,CE
)-l ~~93
CITY OF
eridian
IDAHO
~
'&C
SJ\ll'&lT u.-€-"I
<Yt'/r~ TRE1\SURE V,,,,-
- ....
SINGE '~"
1893 '.
I
I
j
)
/I
9
February 4, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Meridian Police Department
February 5,2002
ITEM NO.
4-D-1
REQUEST Intouch Solutions, Inc. -- Sales Agreement
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLlCE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See Attached
^~Q .rY
OiT I
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of MerIdian.
inTouch
SOLUTIONS
Page 1
INTOUCH SOLUTIONS, INC.
SALES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made between INTOUCH SOLUTIONS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, located 8783 W. Hackamore. Ste. 6, Boise. ro
83709, (hereinafter referred to as "INTOUCH SOLUTIONS") and Meridian Police Department 20 I E. Idaho Meridian ro. 83642 (hereinafter
referred to as Customer)
I. INTOUCH SOLUTIONS agrees to sell to Customer and Customer agrees to purchase from INTOUCH SOLUTIONS communications
equipment listed on Schedule I (hereinafter the "equipment") upon the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement.
2.
INTOUCH
iLf:.; I ~
SOLUTIONS shall
IA} ~ J .!..- +J ~v 2-.~
i nstatl the
111'\ .~ .... ,d. ,\ >-,
equipment on
T,.1 .j' ) bLf L
Customer's
premises
at:
3. The estimated cutover date is:
4. The purchase price for the equipment is $_75,750.00 , which includes all labor to install the equipment and freight. Atl
applicable sales tax and any other taxes shatl also be paid by Customer. Estimated sales tax is $ _0_. The purchase price also
includes a limited warranty as set forth on the reverse side, Total Purchase Price = $ _75,750.00
5. Customer agrees that the purchase price shatl be paid to INTOUCH SOLUTIONS under the financing alternatives selected below: (check one)
!21 (a) Outright Purchase: The purchase price shalt be paid by Customer as fotlows:
_ _ _% upon execution of this Agreement.
_ _ __% upon delivery of equipment-to Customer's premises.
_ _ _ _ % upon project completion & acceptance by Customer.
o (b) Lease: Type of Lease Factor Purchase Option of Term:
Months at $ Imo. + tax $ ;: $
Terms:_ Lease payment(s) paid upon executive of this Agreement leaving _equal payments to be billed by Lessor.
Note: The actual terms of the lease will be determined by a third party lessor (not INTOUCH SOLUTIONS) selected by Customer and
are not a part of this contract. It is Customer's responsibility to enter into a separate lease agreement behveen Customer and such
lessor. If Customer does not obtain approval of such lease at least five (5) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) prior to
the cut-over date, then INTOUCH SOLUTIONS at its option shatl have the right to (I) extend the cutover date. or (2) immediately
reclaim possession of any of the equipment delivered to Customer and thereupon terminate this Agreement. Upon obtaining approval of
the lease, Customer agrees to execute atI necessary lease documents no later than the cutover date to authorize the lessor to pay the
entire purchase price plus applicable taxes to INTOUCH SOLUTIONS immediately upon cutover. Title to the equipment shall remain
with INTOUCH SOLUTIONS until the entire purchase price is paid.
!21 (c) Purchase Order
6. THE TERlvlS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH ON PAGE TWO OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE AND ARE AS MUCH A PART HEREOF AS IF WRITIEN ABOVE THE SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES.
7. CUSTOMER, HA VING CAREFULLY READ ALL PROV1SIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COpy
OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE SCHEDULES MADE A PART HEREOF WHICH ARE THE FINAL EXPRESSION OF THE
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES AND THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE TERMS AGREED UPON, ALL
PRIOR AGREEMENTS AND UNDERSTANDINGS BEING NlERGED HEREIN. THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES
OR STIPULATIONS, EITHER ORAL OR WRITIEN, NOT HEREIN CONTAINED. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE EFFECTIVE
AND BINDING UNLESS AND UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY AN OFFICER OF INTOUCH SOLUTIONS.
Effective Date of the Agreement is;
Thomas Dever
Title:
Sales Representative
INTO~;.(),!poNS.INC .- 'J
By: ,,/:;:'{;J/tA ~/ L#Vl
! ~ . "
Title: ,i(.,:-,.,:.....~< ,..)41:..; J/I.J~";-1~ '_
,J . j
CUSTOMER:
By;
:\DDlTIONAL TERMS AND CONntTlONS Page 2
1. PERFORMANCE
(a). INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall install the equipment according to INTOUCH SOLUTIONS standard installation practices. INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall perform its
standard acceptance testing on the installed equipment. Upon successful completion thereof. INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall notify customer that the equipment has been
installed and operates in accordance with applicable test and performance specifications. The date of such notification shall be the installation completion date.
(b). The installation completion date. cutover date, warranty work and any other performance by INTOUCH SOLUTIONS hereunder. whether the equipment is purchased or
leased, shall be subject to delays caused by events beyond INTOUCH SOLUTIONS control inclUding, but not limited to an Act of God, war. riot. fire, explosion, accident,
nood. sabotage, inability to obtain fuel or power, govemmentallaws. r8jJulations or strike, lockout or injunClion (whether or not such labor event is within the reasonable
control of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS). In the event of any delay, the date(s) set forth herein and the times for performance of any ather obligations hereunder will be extended
accordingly for additional period(s) of time to cover such period(s) of delay.
(c.) Whether the equipment is purchased or leased. INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall use its best efforts to make timely delivery and installation. However, all stated delivery or
installation dates are approximate and INTOUCH SOLUTIONS SHALL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES, SPECIAL. CONSEQUENTIAL, OR
OTHERWISE. FOR DEL4.YS IN DELIVERY OR INSTALL4.Tl0N.
2. LIMITED WARRANTY:
(a). Whether the equipment is purChased or leased, INTOUCH SOLUTIONS. subject to the conditions set forth herein, warrants to Customer that, for a period as oumned an
Schedule I from the installation date, the equipment will be free from defects in material and workmanship. Subject to the limitations set forth below, if any defects covered by
this Warranty appear within the stated period, INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall have the Option of repairing or replacing the equipment at its expense. Such repair or
replacement shall be Customer's sole remedy for the breach of warranty or far negligence.
(b). INTOUCH SOLUTIONS wlil not be obligated to repair or repiace any Item of equipment which has been repaired by others. abused or improperly handled. slored. allered
or used with third party material or equipment which material or equipment is defective or of poor quality, and INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall not be obligated to repair or
replace eqUlpmentwhich has not been installed by INTOUCH SOLUTIONS.
(c). Warranty work shall be performed by iNTOUCH SOLUTIONS as soon as reasonably practicable at the location of the equipment (or at the INTOUCH SOLUTIONS
location, as appropriate). INTOUCH SOLUTIONS normal working hours for purposes of this Agreement are 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday, except Holidays.
Services performed due to Customer's operational requirements. outside the aforesaid normal working hours, will be billed to and paid by Customer in accordance with
INTOUCH SOLUTiONS standard rates
3. DISCLAIMER OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES;
WHETHER THE EQUIPMENT is PURCHASED OR LEASED. THE LIMITED WARRANTY STATED ABOVE SHALL BE IN LIEU OF AND EXCLUDES ALL OTHER
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING. BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICUL4.R PURPOSE.
4. LIMITATION OF DAMAGES: -
WHETHER THE EQUIPMENT IS PURCHASED OR LEASED, INTOUCH SOLUTIONS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR
COMPANY FOR ANY SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMGES OR FOR LOSS, DAMGE OR EXPENSE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING FROM USE OF THE
EQUIPMENT SOLD OR LEASED HEREUNDER OR ARISING FROM CUSTOMER'S INABILITY TO USE THE EQUIPMENT EITHER SEPARATELY OR IN COMBINATION
WITH ANY OTHER EQUIPMENT OR FROM ANY OTHER CAUSE,
5. INTERCONNECTION WITH UTILITY FACILITIES;
INTOUCH SOLUTiONS services shall be limited to the installation of the equipment on the Customer's side of the interface equipment connecting the equipment to the
telephone system operated by the local telephone utility. In the event the utility fails to timely make available interconnect selVices INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall not be
responsible nor shall INTOUCH SOLUTIONS be obligated to pay the interconnect tariff or other charges of the INTOUCH SOLUTIONS services, Interconnect services
shail be limited to the installation of the equipment on the Customer's side of the interface and connection of the equipment to the utility with respect to such services.
6. CUSTOMER'S RESPONSIBILITIES;
The Customer shall, at its expense, during the period of installation services hereunder:
(a) Allow employees or agents of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS free access to premises and facilities where the equipment is to be installed at all hours consistent with
requirements of the installation.
(b) Assure that the premises will meet all temperature, humidity control, air-alnditioning, and other environmental requirements set forth in the applicable equipment
specifications, and will be dry and free from dust and in such condition as not to be injurious to the employees or agents of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS or the equipment to be
installed.
(c] Provide electric current for any necessary purpose with suitable terminals in rooms where it is required.
7. ASSIGNMENT; SUBCONTRACTING;
This Agreement may be assigned by INTOUCH SOLUTiONS in whale or in part and INTOUCH SOLUTIONS may freely subcontract any or all of the work hereunder. The
Customer may not assign this Agreement in whole or in part without obtaining the prior written consent of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
8. DEFAULT;
If any of Customer's obligations to INTOUCH SOLUTIONS shall not be paid promptly when due. or if Customer breaches any ather provision hereof, Customer shall be in
default hereunder and all unpaid amounts shall, at INTOUCH SOLUTIONS aptian, become immediately due and payable. Upon Customer's default, lNTOUCH SOLUTIONS
shall have all the rights and remedies as may exist under the law. including the right to any delinquent payments far which Customer agrees to remain fully liable. No remedy
of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS hereunder shall be exclusive of any other remedy herein or provided by law, but such remedies shall be cumulative and in addition to every other
remedy, As long as any part of the balance due remains outstanding, title to the equipment shall remain in lNTOUCH SOLUTIONS, until all amounts due hereunder are fully
paid. If default occurs in any of Customer's obligations to INTOUCH SOLUTIONS under this Agreement, then interest will accrue at the rate of 18% per annum. or as allowed
by State law, an the entire unpaid balance from the date of default until paid. If lNTOUCH SOLUTIONS fails to perform at the service level detailed in this Agreement. or
breaches any ather provision of this Agreement, Customer shail be entitled to cancel this Agreement Customer shall be entitled to a prorated refund of any pre-paid
amounts.
9. AMENDMENTS; CHANGES:
If it becomes desirable or necessary at any time subsequent to the date of this Agreement and prior to completion of performance hereunder to make any change in the terms
of this Agreement or to any of the Schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof, any such change may be agreed upon only in writing sig ned by an authorized
representative of Customer and an authorized officer of INTOUCH SOLUTIONS. and in such event the price, wori( schedules and ather terms and conditions as appropriale
may be changed by the parties in a written amendment hereto.
10. ATTORNEY FEES:
In the event an action is brought to enforce any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement by either party hereto, the prevailing party Shall be entitled to recover from the
losing party reasonable attomey's fees incurred in addition to such other rellef as may be granted.
SCHEDULE A WIRING
MERIDIAN POLlCE DEPARTMENT
Project:Meridian - Cat 5 E~Plenum
Item No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30.
31
32
Description
6 Strand Fiber - Optispeed
MM SC Connector
Fiber Panel
2 port Plate
3 Port Plate
Cat 5E Plenum Data Cable
Cat 5E Plenum Voice Cable
Cat 5E Data Jack
Cat 5E Voice Jack
1 Port Plate
100 Pr Plenum Cable
Wall Phone Plate
19" Floor Rack
Ground kit for Rack
Earthquake Brace kit for Rack
Floor mt kit
Cable Runway Center Support
48 Port Category 5E Patch Panel
24 Port Category 5E Patch Panel
Wire Mgt Panel
Butt Splice kit
12 " Cable Runway- 10Ft length
Wall Angle Support kit
Junction splice Kit
3" Channel Rack to Runway plate
10' Cat 5E RJ-45 / RJ/45 Patch Cable
SC to SC Multi Mode Fiber Jumper
300 Pr 110 Block
Standoff Bracket for 110 Block
110 Wire Managers
11 0 C4 Clips
66 Blocks
Mise Hardware ( Tie wraps, Jhooks, Beam Clamps)
Quantity
125
24
2
13
81
35000
20000
175
100
6
125
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
1
6
4
3
2
4
2
179
2
7
4
8
160
10
275
SCHEDULE A WIRING CONT.
MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Total Material Cost
Total Labor Cost
$ 24,568.00
$ 17,932.00
$ 42,500.00
Total Wiring Cost
Payment Schedule
1. Material will be billed at time of Delivery
2. 50% of labor will be billed upon 50% completion of cables terminated
3. Remaining 50% of labor will be billed upon 100% completion of project.
SCHEDULE A
MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Equipment List
Qty Part Number
1 NT7B53FA93
1 NT7B83AL93
1 NTBB06GA93
1 NTBB25GA93
1 NTBB41FB93
1 NT7B75GA93
1 NTB74GA93
30 NT8B27MBA
4 NT8840AE03
4 NT8B41 F AD3
1 NT5B74AX93
4 NT8B6DCA
1 NT AB2666
15
25
1
1
Description
Modualar ICS with Power Supply
Modular ICS Software ReI. 5 for T-1
Modular ICS 6 Port Fiber Expansion Module
Service Cartridge
Fiber Station Module
LS/DS Trunk Cartridge
Digital Trunck Interface
Black T316 Display Speakerphones
Black M7324 Display Speakerphones
Black key lamp Modules
Voice Mail Model 4
Aux Power Supply
Norstar Audio Conferencing Unit
Valcom Self Amplified Paging Speakers
ACS Recording Interfaces
Door Phone
Installation Training and One Year Warranty
Total Telephone Proposal $ 33,250.00
Payment Schedule
1. Telephone Equipment will be billed upon completion of project.
RESOLUTION NO.
t!lZ- :311-
BY: $//1 ;/~f
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND ADOPTING NEW FEES AND
ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
SECTION 1: FINDINGS: Pursuant to the authority of this City to operate
and maintain development application revie.ws, inspections, site plan and
development plan reviews, and to reduce the sewer main inspection fees, and to
establish fees for services pursuant to S 63 -1311; and it being found in the best
interests of the City to conduct and provide said services as herein provided, and it
being found that there are costs to the City to provide such services and that the fees
herein established are reasonably related to, but do not exceed, the actual cost of
providing those services.
SECTION 2: ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE: The new and adjusted fees
for said Public Works Department are listed herein below and are hereby approved,
established and authorized to be collected as follows:
Commercial or Industrial Site Plan
Initial
Review
Third and Subsequent
Reviews
Utility Plan Review
With no new water or sewer mains (services
existing)
With no new water or sewer mains (services
not existing)
With new public water or sewer mains
$68
$34
$102
$51
$204 + $0.40 per lineal
foot
$102 + $0.20 per lineal
foot
Drainage Plan Review
< I.S acres
$92
$46
Resolution on new and adjusted fees for the Public Works Department I Page I of 3
1.5 to LO.O acres
LO.O to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water or sewer mains
New water main
New sewer main
Drainage System Inspection
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to [0.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Subdivision Plans
Anne.xation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Water System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System Modeling - by Consultant
Sewer System Modeling - by Public Warks
Sewer System Modeling - by Consultant
Final Plat
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Plan Review
Off-site Water or Sewer Main Plan Review
Homeowners Association Pressurized
Irrigation System Review
Sewage Lift Station Rcvicw
Private Strcet Review
Inspection
Water Main Inspection
Sewer Main Inspection (rcduce from $2.31 per
lineal foot)
Pressurized Irrigation System Inspcction
Sewage Lift Station Inspection
$184
$276
$552
$92
$138
$276
One-time Fee
$30
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$30
$60
$240
$480
One-Time Fee
$82
$82
$82
$] 60 + $[ per lot
$368
Time..and Matcrials
$368
Timc and Materials
$160 + $1 per lot
$200
$240 + $10 pcr lot
$0.40 per lineal foot
$70 + $5 per lot
$276
$[00 + $0.10 per lineal
foot along street ccnterline
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$150
$225
$300
50 or less services
51 to [00 services
101 or more services
$240
SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the new fees and
adjustments pertaining to the Public Works development application reviews,
inspections, site plan and development plan reviews, and for the reduction in the
sewer main inspection fees, shall be March 1, 2002.
Resolution on new and adjusted fees for the Public Works Department / Page 2 of 3
SECTION 4: APPLICATIONS: Any and all applications filed for
development application reviews, inspections, site plan and development plan
reviews, or sewer main inspection fees on or after the effective date of March 1, 2002,
shall be required to pay the new fees or adjustments.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of ,n6r?c?( Yj ,2002.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
5'11:::: day of rf:::/J/rua rJ ,2002.
5~
ATTEST:
.:;
'.
"--
[:=
\';~{:~=,::~~5l
Z:\Work\rvt\Meridian\rvteridian 15360M\Resolutions City ]-lall\2002\Res'~1~lti~I~NEWPUBLlCWOR](S FEES AND
ADJUSTrvtENTSO 12402.doc
i.t' t ;i:~ ;:~.l~)::'t::!I;'!~f'
;\""i ;Qr~,.,,',); '.
;:t~~ --~;:':::~;/~~;'<":"
...., v A??O:,>, ,,', "'r ",
,::" .,,0'"" .....c \. ':.,
2 ~ 0' ,:
.,
~N; A;~ -
Resolution on new and adjusted fees for the Public Works Department! Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK
OF
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify:
1. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerk of the City of Meridian,
a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its
principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho.
2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custoflian of its records and
minutes and do hereby certify that on the SIf:: day of /7;::/?/-ua1../t/L ' 2002, the
following action has been taken and authorized. (j
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
MAIGNG CERTAIN FINDINGS AND ADOPTING NEW FEES AND
ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
SECTION 1: FINDINGS: Pursuant to the authority of this City to operate
and maintain development application reviews, inspections, site plan and
development plan reviews, and to reduce the sewer main inspection fees, and to
establish fees for services pursuant to S 63-1311; and it being found in the best
interests of the City to conduct and provide said services as herein provided, and it
being found that there are costs to the City to provide such services and that the fees
herein established are reasonably related to, but do not exceed, the actual cost of
providing those services.
SECTION 2: ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE: The new and adjusted fees
for said Public Works Department are listed herein below and are hereby approved,
established and authorized to be collected as follows:
Commercial or Industrial Site Plan
Initial
Review
Third and Subsequent
Reviews
Utility Plan Review
With no new water or sewer mains (services
existing)
With no new water or sewer mains (services
$68
$34
$102
$51
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK - PUBLIC WORKS NEW FEES AND
ADJUSTMENTS PAGE 1 OF 3
not existing)
With new public water or sewer mains
Drainage Plan Review
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Water and Sewer Inspection
No new water or sewer mains
New water main
New sewer main
Drainage System Inspection
< 1.5 acres
1.5 to 10.0 acres
10.0 to 20 acres
> 20 acres
Subdivision Plans
Annexation and Zoning
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Water System Modeling - by Public Works
Water System Modeling - by Consultant
Sewer System Modeling - by Public Works
Sewer System Modeling - by Consultant
Final Plat
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Plan Review
Off-site Water or Sewer Main Plan Review
Homeowners Association Pressurized
Irrigation System Review
Sewage Lift Station Review
Private Street Review
Inspection
Water Main Inspection
Sewer Main Inspection (reduce from $2.31 per
lineal foot)
Pressurized Irrigation System Inspection
Sewage Lift Station Inspection
$204 + $0.40 per lineal
foot
$92
$184
$276
$552
One-time Fee
$30
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$30
$60
$240
$480
One-Time Fee
- $82
$82
$82
$160 + $1 per lot
$368
Time and Materials
$368
Time and Materials
$] 60 + $1 per lot
$200
$240 + $ 10 per lot
$0.40 per lineal foot
$70 + $5 per lot
$276
$100 + $0.10 per lineal
foot along street centerline
$1.00 per lineal foot
$1.00 per lineal foot
$150
$225
$300
$240
$102 + $0.20 per lineal
foot
$46
$92
$138
$276
50 or less services
5 [ to 100 services
101 or more services
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK- PUBLIC WORKS NEW FEES AND
ADJUSTMENTS PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the new fees and
adjustments pertaining to the Public Works development application reviews,
inspections, site plan and development plan reviews, and for the reduction in the
sewer main inspection fees, shall be March 1, 2002.
SECTION 4: APPLICATIONS: Any and all applications filed for
development application reviews, inspections, site plan and development plan
reviews, or sewer main inspection fees on or after the effective date of March I, .7.Q92,
\\,\p'<'., ,'..: 'f,.
shall be required to pay the new fees or adjustments. ,:-"\"\\\r.f!?':,r,
.),; .~i <..l
'<;.,'.. "*l'~ _;..-,~
........:..' ?6~' -r-""~ -:t<~~
,';: U' rO'''' Of}'.4 i':;
~ ~J c..\
~~, ~
_.
:.:~
STATE OF IDAHO,
ss:
County of Ada. )
On this 64GJ day of ~~ (V\DJ~, 2002, before me,
SS(t[,L( oY\. ~'(V'v~-t_~ -, a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM
G. BERG. JR., la10wn or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian.
( SEAL)
ei!luat4l'i
",'l">$ON S €I'+$
.~~oi~~~~.
lI'~1 "'V ..,... ....,~ (II
q I III
OJ , lI!I
EI : I iii
111I , . L l!Iil
'llI , e
'I!> ' III
G. cY~..~\~~:,t+1II
.+~"'l.,;.,---...n~.v
......uOF~..
ar.ll!lImaat/>.
Sho.xliYJ ~ ~ -te....J
Notaty Public for Idaho ,
Residence: Adj0 c.D~~ ,Jda~"
Commission Expires: (!) - 7_( - (95
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Rcso1utions City Hall\2002\CERTofCLKPWFecsAdjustmtsO 12502.doc
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK- PUBLIC WORKS NEW FEES AND
ADJUSTMENTS PAGE 3 OF 3
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 51 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3- D
REQUEST Tabled from January 15,2002 - Five Mile Trunk latecomers Agreement
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
See previous Item Packet
See attached letter from Bill Nichols
~l
~
cvW'
~ ,I
fp\iJ
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shalf become property of the City of Meridian.
JAt~ , 4 200WHITE PETERSON
WHI~ZfJ{,i2MM~ow, GlORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
K~VIN E. DINIUS
JUl-1 ~ Kl-~IN F1SCH~R
WM. F. OIGRAY, !II
D. SAMU~l- JOHNSON
JILl- S. JURRIES
LARRY D. MOORE
WILLIAM A. MORROW
Wll-LIAM F. NICHOl-S'
CHRISTOPH~R S. NYE
PHIUP A. PETERSON
ERICA S. PHll-LlPS
ERIC S. ROSSMAN
TODD A. ROSSMAN
DAVID M. SWARTL~Y
TERRENCE R. WHITE"
NICHOLAS L. WOl-L~N
200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31
POST OFFICE BOX 1150
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150
TEL (208) 288.2499
FAX (20B) 28B-250]
NAMPA OFFICE
CANYON PARK AT THE IDAHO CENTER
5700 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 200
NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-8402
TEL (208) 466.9272
FAX (208) 466.4405
'Al.SO ADMITTED IN OR
uAl.SO ADMITTED IN WA
PLEASE REPLY TO
MERIDIAN OFFICE
January 18,2002
Mayor Robert D. Corrie
City Council
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Five Mile Trunk Latecomers Agreement / Case No. 4.6.32.a
Dear Mavor Corrie and Council Members:
..
On the agenda for February 5, 2002 will be a proposed Sanitary Sewer
Latecomers Agreement between the City and the City Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Mr. Freckleton believed it advisable to have a Latecomers Agreement which would
allow the Wastewater Department to be reimbursed for costs spent in extending the
Five Mile Sewer Trunk. The proposed Latecomers Agreement also has the fee
reimbursed on a per acre basis.
I recommend that you do not approve this Agreement. First, it does not make
sense for the City to have an Agreement with itself. Second, under Meridian City
Code s9-4-18, there is a method through which the City can recoup sewer
construction costs from upstream users whose land becomes developable by
connection to the City sewer. That code section, a copy which is attached to this
memo, requires that this equivalency fee be based upon equivalent residential units,
rather than acreage. The City Code also allows a Board of Appraisers to set these
fees.
Because Woodbridge has objected to the proposed method for assessment, I
recommend that the City Board of Appraisers schedule a hearing, at which the
Wastewater Department can present the costs of extending the trunk, and the
increased capacity created thereby so that the costs per equivalent residential unit can
be determined. The Notice of Hearing should be published, and Woodbridge
specifically should also be given a notice of the time, date and place of the hearing, so
that they can participate and object, if they have a good reason, toward the basis of
the calculations or the final per ERU costs. Since Woodbridge has also objected to
this method of setting latecomer or sewer equivalency fees, I further recommend that
a second hearing be held in front of the City Council, after the appropriate
publication of notice, to set the ERU Sewer Equivalency Fees for this extension.
If you "vish, this matter can be discussed at the Council meeting on FebrualY 5,
2002.
Cc: Gmy Smith, Public Works Director
Brad Watson, Public Works
Stac."y Kilchenmann, Finance Director
\\NPASVRDCO I \SERVERZ\Work\M\Ml'ridian\Meridian 15360M\Public
Works\MayorCouncil5MileSewerTrunkO 11802Llr,doc
9-4-17 9-4-18
9-4-17: SEWER AND WATER PLANS ADOPTED:
A. Adoption Of Plans: The sewer and water plans as defined in the
"Preliminary Report - Rural Community Sewer and Water Plan for
Ada County - Meridian" is hereby adopted as the Sewer and Water
Plan for Meridian.
B.
Treatment Requirements: Sewage treatment for Meridian will be
economically efficient; environmentally beneficial; in compliance with
Idaho and Federal regulations; and consisting of either secondary
treatment with discharge to the Boise River, advanced treatment with
discharge to Five Mile Creek or spray disposal following treatment,
depending on the economic, engioneering, financial, environmental
and legal constraints defined in the pre-engineering studies
necessary before 90nstruction or financing, (Res, 54, 11-5-1973)
.
9-4-18:
SEWER GONSTRUCTION EQUIVALENCY FEE:
A.
Payment Of Fee Required: Notwithstanding any of the provisions of
this Chapter, any person, firm, partnership, corporation or
association or property owner who has not otherwise paid for, or
contributed proportionately toward, the costs and expenses of
constructing a sewer line, whether that construction has been
performed by the City, a local improvement district or a private
entity, or combination thereof, and who subsequently desires to
connect to the City sewer system, shall be required to pay, in
addition to the required connection charges of subsection 9-4-25B of
this Chapter and the monthly user charges of Section 9-4-24 of this
Chapter, an additional connection charge which shall be known as
an "eight inch (8") diameter sewer line equivalency fee". This fee
shall hereafter be referred to as the "sewer construction equivalency
fee", In determining who has or has not paid, or contributed
proportionately, toward the costs and expenses of constructing a
sewer line, the sole factor shall be whether that user, or a
predecessor in title of the user's property, has in fact, paid
consideration to the City in cash, services, or in kind, for the
construction of the sewer trunk line to which he now desires to
connect, which consideration is commensurate with what the user, or
his predecessor in title, would have paid under this Section had the
user not paid or contributed previously to the cost of construction of
the sewer line,
.
.
B. Fee Set By Board Of Appraisers: The sewer construction
equivalency fee for each parcel of ground connected to a trunk
..
City of Meridian
9-4-18
.
9-4-19:
A.
.
.
9~4~ 19
sewer !in'e shall be established and set by the Sewer Board of
Appraisers which shall consider the use to which the property will be
put, the expected flows, the amount of capacity of the trunk line that
will be used by the proposed use, and the type of effluent. The
Board shall also take into consideration the amount of land that
might be able to be serviced by the trunk sewer line, whether the
land be directly adjacent to the trunk line or not, and shall also take
into consideration the cost of the engineering and construction of the
trunk line, in cu'rrent dollars, and shall consider the interest that
could have been earned on the money used t'o pay for the original
sewer line. The sewer construction equivalency fee may be different
for residential, commercial, and industrial uses and may be different
for differing uses within those thre,e (3) classifications depending
upon the considerations referenced above but shall be as consistent
as possible und,er similar factual circumstances. The sewer
construction equivalency fee shall be assessed in terms of single-
family equivalent ,connections. (Ord. 482,"6-16-1987)
COOPERA TIVE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS:
Reimbursement To Sewer User: Should a sewer user at his own
expense construct an extension to the sewer system in a public right
of way or easement with prior approval of the City and in accordance
with the standards and designs of the City and which sewer line
extension has been determined by the City to be able to benefit
properties other than the user's, the sewer user constructing the
extension may request that the City enter into an agreement with the
user such that all or a portion of the costs of extending the sewer
line will be reimbursed to that sewer user from the connection
charges collected under Section 9-4-18 of this Chapter from those
property owners who will benefit from the sewer line extension and
who otherwise have not paid or contributed their proportionate share
of the construction costs of that sewer line and who are required to
pay the sewer construction equivalency fee. The City shall not be
required to enter into such an agreement and whether or not to enter
into such an agreement shall be at the sole discretion of the City
Council; provided however, that:
1. No reimbursement agreement shall have a duration greater than
ten (10) years unless the City is a beneficiary of the agreement.
2. No reimbursement agreement shall pay to the sewer user paying
for or constructing a sewer line extension more than one hundred
percent (100%) of his actual .engineering and construction costs, it
City of Meridian
February 1, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 5, 2002
APPLICANT Park's Department -- Tom Kuntz
ITEM NO.
4-C-l
REQUEST Request to reject all bids on Meridian Skate Park
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK: See attached
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MER1DIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
.~ /;
rPt
-.rJ-S
~~
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
REC
FEB 0 1 2002
To:
From:
Date:
CC:
Re:
Mayor Corrie and Council
Tom Kuntz
February 1, 2002
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 5 - Council Agenda item - Skate Park Construction bids
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
The Parks and Recreation Staff requests authorization from the City CounciL to reject all
bids for the construction of the Tully Skate Park. All three bids were well over the
budgeted amount of $120,000 and the architect's estimate of $128,000.
The bids opened on December 3 were as follow: Wright Brothers $ 188,750
CSDI $ 190,000
K-J Corp. $ 196,978
C:\Documents and seWngs'greent.MERIDIANCITY\Local Settings\Temporary 1ntemet Files\OLK14B\skate park bids_memo.doc Page 1
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 5, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3wK
REQUEST South Slough Sewer Temporary Construction Easement
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted:
See attached
vJl/
Off rv
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shalf become property of the City of Meridian.
$ouf-IA CS;/oOJh S~W~
T-<a..V\A p ~ COv\":>trw 0+' cA/\
Ea..s~ \I"V\ ~ '^' 1--
Me
Covt'S,<a V\ "t Aj~V\clC\
,L ,.~ """.:tf K
To: Mayor Corrie
From: Brad Watson, P.E. ;6/{'tJ
cc: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk
Date: 2/1/2002
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for January 22 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
February 5 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration (we
would be happy to discuss any of the following items under Department Reports if you wish
to pull these from the Consent Agenda):
1) South SloUQh Sewer Temporary Construction Easement. This easement is for the
portion of the sewer project on the southeast comer of the intersection of Ustick and
Eagle Roads. Payment for the temporary sewer construction easement is $267.40.
A copy of the signed easement and related correspondence are enclosed.
Recommended Council Action: Approval
2)
Ten Mile Interchanoe Sewer Study - JUS Enoineers. JUB Engineers is requesting an
addendum to their agreement for professional services for this project. As you are
aware, the study was initiated at the request of Dakota Company who agreed to
reimburse the City for the cost of the study. The cost of the project based on the
original scope was $19,730. The focus of the study the study was the area east of
Ten Mile Road, between Franklin Road and 1-84. It became apparent during the
course of the study that we needed to look at a "bigger picture" that evaluated
sewering options for the entire service area north of 1-84. In addition, Council has
asked for additional information at the planning workshops that was not in the original
scope of the project. Consequently, JUB Engineers is seeking an increase in their
contract amount of $3,700 for a contract total of $23,430. We will still require
reimbursement of the original $19,730 from Dakota From the desk Qr...
Company. The additional $3,700 would be the GitYs
responsibilities as the additional work was not necessarily
tied to the Dakota Company's interest alone.
Brad Watson, P.F.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Dcpartmcrrt
660 E. Wntertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, fdaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-] 297
watsonb@ci.mcridianidllS
We feel this increase is appropriate and that JUB Engineers is providing our
department and, hopefully, the Mayor and City Council with useful infonnation.
Recommended Council Action: approve the addendum to the Agreement for
Professional Services with JUS Engineers for the Ten Mile Interchange Sewer
Study to include a contract increase amount of $3,700.00, to be paid by the City
of Meridian and not reimbursed by Dakota Company (or their assigns).
3) Woodbridqe Subdivision NO.2 Off-Site Water Line Proiect - Aoreement for
Professional Services. As you recall, City Council directed the Public Works
Department to design and construct the water line from the eastern boundary of
Woodbridge Subdivision NO.2 to the existing line in Magic View Drive approximately
1,500 feet east. To better coordinate the subdivision and off-site water projects, we
asked O'Neill Enterprises (dba Woodbridge Community, LLC) if they would be
agreeable to including the design and construction of the off-site water line in their
plans and project with reimbursement by the City. They are agreeable to this and
have provided me with an engineering agreement for review (redlined copy attached).
Their proposal includes design, construction staking and project administration in the
lump sum amount of $4,772.50. The estimated project construction cost is
approximately $50,000. Copies of related correspondence are also included.
Conger Management will deliver a revised and signed agreement that addresses my
redline comments later this afternoon.
Recommended Council Action: approve the reimbursement for design,
construction staking and project administration with Woodbridge Community,
LLC for the Woodbridge Subdivision No.2 Off-Site Water Line Project in the
lump sum amount $4,772.50, and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk
to attest.
We request that the following items be placed on the February 5 City Council agenda, under
Public Works Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) White Drain Trunk Sewer Pennanent and Temporary Construction Easement- John
Kennedv. This is a somewhat odd situation. Mr. Kennedy's property is located
immediately west of the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision. He signed a sewer
easement and right-of-way contract in July 2001 , which was approved by City Council
on July 12, 2001. That easement traversed the northern-most part of his property
and met up with the Cedar Springs plat at its northwest comer.
.. Page 2
Mr. Kennedy had a subdivision layout sketched for him that he believes will match up
better with Cedar Springs' future stub streets. He wants to vacate the existing
easement and have a new one approved that matches the sketched layout of future
streets. Either alignment will work for the sewer.
The "kick.er", so to speak, is that Mr. Kennedy now wants payment for the easement
in accordance with the appraisal we had completed, whereas he requested nospayment for the initial easement. The appraised value of the pennanent and
temporary construction easements is $9,550.00.
We feel the new proposed alignment will work better with both Mr. Kennedy's and the
Cedar Springs project, if approved. However, either alignment is satisfactory. Kevin
Howell, Cedar Springs developer, has told me verbally that he would rather the sewer
enter his project on the stub street than through the northwest comer of the project.
Copies of the easements, right-of-way contract and proposed Kennedy subdivision
sketch are attached.
Recommended Council Action: Request discussion
Thank you. Please contact me jf you have any questions regarding any of these items.
Jf~
.. Page 3
I
(1/ L'(') \' f' ")}] ';
_f\Ui ~. c.:::::.)c:i TC:7.t, ~-,1.1,L.
l\\dC))!!lHRI
I\! l()R\1 \ ;\1 L^\\
IIl)l} ~III'I<III\I llRI\I. ~tlll )(H.I3f)I~I.11J anO) CCJv'\s.'lt~ A.jti'..\A.d.'('
,lJl1oN1: 208-)tl).(> 101 1\\ )01) ).I)-{ltI58 li\].,d. k"rrl)ll~I@,\JI(Rf)\ \11 -:n:-nR-----~--.-.
"5o~~ "S loU'~ lro; ~~W"V-
~ IjV\ p. COV\"S. i,.o..) It. '"}~
r-=o.. s ~ \M Q..,^ 1-
January 17, 2002
Mr. Gary Smith, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
RECEIVED
JAN ') , 2U02
City of Meridian
Public Works Director
RE: Sewer Pipeline Easement for the City of Meridian
Dear Mr. Smith:
I am responding to your January 1 cr. 2002 letter to Joy Moore, a copy of
which I requested from Rick Mallary of the Langdon Group yesterday, My firm
represents the Melvin R. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust. We did not receive it
as my suite number was inadvertently omitted from you letter.
I have enclosed the Sanitary Sewer Easement, signed by Joy Moore,
Trustee, for the Melvin R. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust. She executed the
agreement subject to the approval of the $267.40 payment by the Meridian City
Counsel. We would appreciate receiving a fully executed copy of the Easement
Agreement for the Trust records once the City Counsel has given their approval.
Please make the check payable to the Melvin r. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust.
We sincerely appreciate you assistance in the matter.
KAIL Q. SEIBERT, P.L.L.C.
. 1
( t -'
f... / C 1.-1-
~/ }['xJev'TvV
Kail Q. Seibert
cc: Joy Moore
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
~...-n _ '2- CJ /' Z-
THIS INDENTURE, made this J.l day of Pli m~~ between Joy A. Moore Trustee
for Melvin R. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust, the party of the first part, and hereinafter
called the Grantor, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second
part, and hereinafter called the Grantee.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer temporary right-of-way
across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;
and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground
pipeline to be constructed by Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,
and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant
and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for the temporary easement for the
construction, of a sanitary sewer line over and across the following described
property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" AND "B")
The temporary construction easement is for the purpose of construction of a
sanitary sewer line and related incidental work. The temporary construction
easement shall expire on the earlier of either the termination of the construction
contract or September 1, 2002.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties
hereto, that the Grantee, in constructing will expediently replace and restore the
premises to a condition comparable to that existent prior to undertaking such
construction. Additionally, if livestock are present in the pasture area during
construction, the Grantee will assure that temporary fencing will be constructed to
contain the livestock. The Grantee will also provide an individual sewer service
stub-out at the manhole located adjacent to the Grantor's property. The existence
of the stub-out does not grant approval to connect to the sewer. All sewer
connections are subject to fees and must be approved by the Grantee.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are la'Nfully seized
and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they
have a good and fa'Nful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant
and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the I a'Nfu I claims
of all persons whomsoever.
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, Page 1 of 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party has hereunto subscribed his signature the day
and year first hereinabove written.
~4. /'YM~ 2u<-aLi-L-
Melvin R. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust, Joy A. Moore, Trustee
STATE OF IDAHO)
) ss
County of Ada )
On this / t!L day 0 , 200), before me ~/(, 4? SG/6ee1 ,
personally appeared o.e.E --r;etI.J7~ , proved to me on the bases of
satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names is subscribed to the within
instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same.
\\ \\;,\\\ I ~\I111111" 1Jfll111.
.:;.,...\..., Q. Sfh /11.f.l"i'.I.
/''\::::.y.. ..:...... ~~.;~
....... l l- "'... ", "'r... ~
,':" ''C'' ,,' O\A~ ~~.. /0 %
:~ :' ":,; , r J ~ ~
~:....:::: ~:::
: -<D- :
, -
'. :.. -<l CJ.: $
\ (p)., I" lIB\..'\ t'- C g
~ "I' 'tr ",..."): ~
.~;,.... ~.-:tJ: it;....." ~...~
"'1'1'1_< f: 0 r: \\) ,\............~
II!11J/"":WI'::II,n\\1\\\\\\
My Commission Expires on
~ - /7-0 f-
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, Page 2 of 3
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, Page 3 of 3
-----
f"" J.U.B A
~
E Ilf,ri !leers Surveyors Plan ners
Project No.:
Date:
Parcel No.:
Grantor:
South Slough Trunk Sewer Extension (11690)
November 19, 2001
51104233802
Melvin R. and Noma E. Schrammeck Trust
CITY OF MERIDIAN
EXHIBIT rrA"
A 60' WIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY
A parcel of land located in a part of the Southwest !!.I, Northwest !!.I, Section 4, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada
County, Idaho, for the purpose of temporary construction easement, and more particularly describes as
foHows:
Commencing at a found brass cap at the Northwest corner Section 4, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County,
Idaho, from which the West 1/4 corner of Section 4 bears South 00035'47" West, 2,611.55 feet; thence along
the Westerly boundary of Section 4, South 00035'47" West, 1,724.87 feet more or less, to the prolongation of
the Northerly boundary of Schrammeck property, as described in instrument No. 95008620 of the Ada County,
Idaho records; thence leaving said Westerly boundary of Section 4, and along prolongation of the Northerly
boundary of Schrammeck property, South 53004'13" East, 86.89 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of
Eagle Road, the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence along the Northerly boundary of Schrammeck property, South 53004'13" East, 74.48 feet to a
point;
thence leaving said Northerly boundary, and parallel with the Easterly right-of-way of Eagle Road,
South 00035'47" West, 57.53 feet to a point;
thence leaving said parallel line, North 89024'13" West, 60.00 feet to a point on the Easterly
right-of-way of Eagle Road;
thence along the Easterly right-Of-way of Eagle Road, North 00035'47" East, 101.66 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 4,775.58 square feet (0.11 acres), more or less.
END OF DESCRIPTION
Refer to Exhibit "B"
Prepared by:
J-U-B ENGINEERS, lnc.
Ronald M. Hodge, P.L.S.
TAJ:lhc
F:\projectmanagers\PHK\11690\ 11690-Sur\admin e-mait\sehrammeck tee. doc
*
32 33
5 4
I
;:
.........
0::
C)
I-
::J
r
......
~
=r-...
"'OJ
v.
'inv C)
I"')N
'1'
o A
0"'-
" CI)
70' D C)
" a.
"w
"
~
"
I-
::J
......
]
"
"".
~
"
x 0
CL <1:
w
0
l- n:::
::J
W
.-J :,
C) " :,
<(
W
G 7' C)
LESLI E I
DRIVE ~p
C)
p
p
C)
I-
::>
x
0.
w
C)
f1.:
R/W
LEGEND
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
00
o
N.
JL
lr
50 - 25- - 0 50
SCALE: 1" =50'
,
100
15" PERMANENT POWER
LINE OVERHANG EASEMENT
INST. #94110104
20' PERMANENT ITD
rlRRIGATION DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
~ S INST. #95003672
~J'.
.> 0,,/,
5{ ';1".0 1..)__
... ~: u" ~
to
to
.
. ~
f> "-
l' ~
'<t- I"')
~ U)
U) .
1001'
bU)
o
(f)
'24'13"W
0:00'
- -
"
~
11
f"Jti.8 A
~
!:>ICIll1!Zl<3 . SURV6YQIlS . 1'UJfN!R3
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO
SOUTH SLOUGH TRUNK
SEWER EXTENSION
MELVIN R. & NOMA SCHRAMMECK TRUST
PROPERTY
NW 1/4, SECTION 4, T3N, RiE, 8M
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
February 5, 2002
ITEM NO.
3-l
REQUEST Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study - J-U-B Engineers
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See attached
ovV
uJff
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
~ ... .lA/Ie IVl~ ~<<J
lev VI. r
5e~ '"S1tJ?
cev\.cs~4 A-j~~
I~V/) L
Me
To: Mayor Corrie
From: Brad Watson, P.E. ;5/ftvl
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk
Date: 2/1/2002
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for January 22 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
February 5 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration (we
would be happy to discuss any of the following items under Department Reports if you wish
to pull these from the Consent Agenda):
1) South Slouah Sewer T emporarv Construction Easement. This easement is for the
portion of the sewer project on the southeast comer of the intersection of Ustick and
Eagle Roads. Payment for the temporary sewer construction easement is $267.40.
A copy of the signed easement and related correspondence are enclosed.
Recommended Council Action: Approval
2)
Ten Mile Interchanae Sewer Study - JUS Enaineers. JUS Engineers is requesting an
addendum to their agreement for professional services for this project. As you are
aware, the study was initiated at the request of Dakota Company who agreed to
reimburse the City for the cost of the study. The cost of the project based on the
original scope was $19,730. The focus of the study the study was the area east of
Ten Mile Road, between Franklin Road and 1~84. It became apparent during the
course of the study that we needed to look at a "bigger picture" that evaluated
sewering options for the entire service area north of 1-84. In addition, Council has
asked for additional information at the planning workshops that was not in the original
scope of the project. Consequently, JUB Engineers is seeking an increase in their
contract amount of $3,700 for a contract total of $23,430. We will still require
reimbursement of the original $19,730 from Dakota From the desk of...
Company. The additional $3,700 would be the City's
responsibilities as the additional work was not necessarily
tied to the Dakota Company's interest alone.
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. WatertOWel' Lane, Suite 200
MeridilUl, Idaho 83642
e Page 1
(208) 898.5500
Fax: (208)887.1297
walsonb@ci.mcridianidus
We feel this increase is appropriate and that JUS Engineers is providing our
department and, hopefully, the Mayor and City Council with useful infonnation.
Recommended Council Action: approve the addendum to the Agreement for
Professional Services with JUS Engineers for the Ten Mile Interchange Sewer
Study to include a contract increase amount of $3,700.00, to be paid by the City
of Meridian and not reimbursed by Dakota Company (or their assigns).
3) Woodbridae Subdivision NO.2 Off-Site Water Line Proiect - Aoreement for
Professional Services. As you recall, City Council directed the Public Works
Department to design and construct the water line from the eastern boundary of
Woodbridge Subdivision NO.2 to the existing line in Magic View Drive approximately
1,500 feet east. To better coordinate the subdivision and off-site water projects, we
asked O'Neill Enterprises (dba Woodbridge Community, LLC) if they would be
agreeable to including the design and construction of the off-site water line in their
plans and project with reimbursement by the City. They are agreeable to this and
have provided me with an engineering agreement for review (redlined copy attached).
Their proposal includes design, construction staking and project administration in the
lump sum amount of $4,772.50. The estimated project construction cost is
approximately $50,000. Copies of related correspondence are also included.
Conger Management will deliver a revised and signed agreement that addresses my
redline comments fateI' this aftemoon.
,-
Recommended Council Action: approve the reimbursement for design,
construction staking and project administration with Woodbridge Community,
LLC for the Woodbridge Subdivision No. 2 Off-Site Water Line Project in the
lump sum amount $4,772.50, and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk
to attest.
We request that the following items be placed on the February 5 City Council agenda, under
Public Works Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) White Drain Trunk Sewer Pennanent and T emoorarv Construction Easement - John
Kennedv. This is a somewhat odd situation. Mr. Kennedy's property is located
immediately west of the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision. He signed a sewer
easement and right-of-way contract in July 2001, which was approved by City Council
on July 12, 2001. That easement traversed the northern-most part of his property
and met up with the Cedar Springs plat at its northwest comer.
Mr. Kennedy had a subdivision layout sketched for him that he believes will match up
better with Cedar Springs' future stub streets. He wants to vacate the existing
easement and have a new one approved that matches the sketched layout of future
streets. Either alignment will work for the sewer.
The "kicker", so to speak, is that Mr. Kennedy now wants payment for the easement
in accordance with the appraisal we had completed, whereas he requested no
payment for the initial easement. The appraised value of the pennanent and
temporary construction easements is $9,550.00.
e Page 2
We feel the new proposed alignment will work better with both Mr. Kennedy's and the
Cedar Springs project, if approved. However, either alignment is satisfactory. Kevin
Howell, Cedar Springs developer, has told me verbally that he would rather the sewer
enter his project on the stub street than through the northwest comer of the project.
Copies of the easements, right-of-way contract and proposed Kennedy subdivision
sketch are attached.
Recommended Council Action: Request discussion
Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items.
Jf~
o Page 3
City of Meridian
TEN-MILE INTERCHANGE SEWER STUDY
-..
Periodic Progress Report
CC^A~~ ~''^~
1*L
From: September 17,2001 to January 17,2002
Invoice Through January 12, 2002
JUB Project # 11757
./ DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED:
1) Met with City on draft report.
2) Conducted new analysis on additional alternative.
3) Created Council handout packet.
4) Presented findings to Council.
5) Reviewed options and approach with City on preferred alternative.
6) Prepared preferred alternative presentation for Council.
7) Calculated developer cost share.
8) Presented preferred alternatives to Council.
./ INFORMATION REQUIRED TO AVOID DELAYS: Awaiting Council meeting in February.
./ CHANGES IN SCOPE OR COMPLEXITY REQUIRING CONTRACT COST ADJUSTMENT:
1) Items #2 through #8 listed above were conducted based on direction from the City and
were not anticipated in the original scope of services. This work was required to
analyze different options based on a discussion of the draft report and to present
findings to Council.
2) Additional work will continued to be billed as directed on a time and materials basis. If
Council concurs with the recommended alternative, it is estimated that it will take
approximately $1,500 to complete and publish the final report.
Current Authorized Amount
Estimated Cost Adjustment
New Authorized Amount
Amount Invoiced to Date
$19,730
$3,700
$23,430
$21,928.41.
Approval for Cost Adjustment Given on:
na
by: na
./ CHANGES IN SCOPE OR COMPLEXITY REQUIRING CONTRACT TIME ADJUSTMENT:
1) New alternative, presentations to Council.
Current Project Completion Date
Estimated Extension Required
New Contract Completion Date
::: Draft report on August 29, 2001.
::: 140 calendar days.
::: Submittal of Final Report will depend on City review
schedule and scope of preferred alternative.
Approval for Time Adjustment Given on: na
by: na
Respectfully Submitted by:
Timothy J. ener, P.E.
J-U.B ENGINEERS, Inc.
February 1, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING
APPLICANT
February 5, 2002
ITEM NO.
3wM
REQUEST Woodbridge Subdivision No.2 Off Site Water Line Project - Agreement for
Professional Services
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
See attached
..yV
11~
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
d-;:.~ A-:\~~9
::ci ~ \M. :t:t= /Vl
1'0: Mayor Corrie
From: Brad Watson, P.E.;J/ftJ
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk
Date: 2/1/2002
IRe: Proposed Agenda Items for January 22 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
February 5 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration (we
would be happy to discuss any of the following items under Department Reports if you wish
to pull these from the Consent Agenda):
1) South Slouoh Sewer Temporary Construction Easement. This easement is for the
portion of the sewer project on the southeast comer of the intersection of Ustick and
Eagle Roads. Payment for the temporary sewer construction easement is $267.40.
A copy of the signed easement and related correspondence are enclosed.
Recommended Council Action: Approval
2)
Ten Mile Interchanoe Sewer Study - JUB EnQineers. JUS Engineers is requesting an
addendum to their agreement for professional services for this project. As you are
aware, the study was initiated at the request of Dakota Company who agreed to
reimburse the City for the cost of the study. The cost of the project based on the
original scope was $19,730. The focus of the study the study was the area east of
Ten Mile Road, between Franklin Road and 1~84. It became apparent during the
course of the study that we needed to look at a "bigger picture" that evaluated
sewering options for the entire service area north of 1-84. In addition, Council has
asked for additional information at the planning workshops that was not in the original
scope of the project. Consequently, JUS Engineers is seeking an increase in their
contract amount of $3,700 for a contract total of $23,430. We will still require
reimbursement of the original $19,730 from Dakota From1he desk of...
Company. The additional $3,700 would be the City's
responsibilities as the additional work was not necessarily
tied to the Dakota Company's interest alone.
Brad Watson, P.E.
city Engineer
Meridian Public Wrnks Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
watsonb@ci.mericlianidus
We feel this increase is appropriate and that JUB Engineers is providing our
department and, hopefully, the Mayor and City Council with useful information.
Recommended Council Action: approve the addendum to the Agreement for
Professional Services with JUS Engineers for the Ten Mile Interchange Sewer
Study to include a contract increase amount of $3J 700.00J to be paid by the City
of Meridian and not reimbursed by Dakota Company (or their assigns).
3) Woodbridae Subdivision NO.2 Off-Site Water Line Project - Aareement for
Professional Services. As you recall, City Council directed the Public Works
Department to design and construct the water line from the eastern boundary of
Woodbridge Subdivision No.2 to the existing line in Magic View Drive approximately
1,500 feet east. To better coordinate the subdivision and off-site water projects, we
asked O'Neill Enterprises (dba Woodbridge Community, LLC) if they would be
agreeable to including the design and construction of the off-site water line in their
plans and project with reimbursement by the City. They are agreeable to this and
have provided me with an engineering agreement for review (redlined copy attached).
Their proposal includes design, construction staking and project administration in the
lump sum amount of $4,772.50. The estimated project construction cost is
approximately $50,000. Copies of related correspondence are also included.
Conger Management wW deliver a revised and signed agreement that addresses my
redline comments later this afternoon.
Recommended Council Action: approve the reimbursement for design,
construction staking and project administration with Woodbridge CommunityJ
LLC for the Woodbridge Subdivision No. 2 Off-Site Water Line Project in the
lump sum amount $4,772.50J and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk
to attest.
We request that the following items be placed on the February 5 City Council agenda, under
Public Works Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) White Drain Trunk Sewer Permanent and Temporarv Construction Easement - John
Kennedv. This is a somewhat odd situation. Mr. Kennedy's property is located
immediately west of the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision. He signed a sewer
easement and right-of-way contract in July 2001, which was approved by City Council
on July 12, 2001. That easement traversed the northern-most part of his property
and met up with the Cedar Springs plat at its northwest comer.
Mr. Kennedy had a subdivision layout sketched for him that he believes will match up
better with Cedar Springs' future stub streets. He wants to vacate the existing
easement and have a new one approved that matches the sketched layout of future
streets. Either alignment will work for the sewer.
The "kicker", so to speak, is that Mr. Kennedy now wants payment for the easement
in accordance with the appraisal we had completed, whereas he requested no
payment for the initial easement. The appraised value of the permanent and
temporary construction easements is $9,550.00.
. Page 2
We feel the new proposed alignment will work better with both Mr. Kennedy's and the
Cedar Springs project, if approved. However, either alignment is satisfactory. Kevin
Howell, Cedar Springs developer, has told me verbally that he would rather the sewer
enter his project on the stub street than through the northwest comer of the project.
Copies of the easements, right-of-way contract and proposed Kennedy subdivision
sketch are attached.
Recommended Council Action: Request discussion
Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items.
Jf~
e Page 3
4 nsen?! AJIli!4t~q
r~ #/11
January 23, 2002
Mr. Brad Watson
City of Meridian
660 East Watertower Lane
Suite 200
Meridian, 10
Woodbridge NO.2 - Offsite Water Connection
RECEIVED
JAN 2 4 2002
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER
Subject:
Dear Brad:
Please find attached an agreement for the design of improvements associated
with the offsite water for the second phase of Woodbridge (a.k.a. Snorting Bull
Subdivision). This proposal, based on a contract with Engineering NorthWest, the
engineer for Snorting Bull No.2, is on a ftxed fee basis for design and
construction staking, as well as an administrative fee for the management of this
work. A separate agreement for the construction of these improvements will be
forthcoming.
Attached is a scope of work with a description of services to be provided under
this agreement as well as a cost schedule detailing the costs associated with the
design and staking of improvements.
Do not hesitate to call me with any questions regarding this agreement. I can be
reached at (208) 336-5355.
Sincerely,
/VDLvy
Jim D. Conger
Project Manager
cc: Derick O'Neill
Gene Smith
Enclosure
4055. 8th Street. SUite 131 . BOise Idaho, 83702' 208.336.5355' Fax 208336.2282
Engineering NorthWest, LLC
10221 W. Emeratd, Suite 140
Boise, Idaho 83704
(208) 376.5000 . Fax O(8) 376.5556
January 21,2002
Woodbridge Community, LLC
C/O Conger Management
405 S. 8th Street) Ste 131
Boise, ID 83702
Attention: Jim Conger
Re: Woodbridge No.2
Off-site Water Design / Staking
Dear Jim:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide Engineering/Surveying services for the above
referenced project. Per our discussion) we will provide the water design and construction
staking for the Off-sit~tl<!:s-ef, tending from the Woodbridge NO.2 development to the
east for approxima,tefy 700 feet along Magic View Drive. This line is anticipated to tie to
the existing 10-inclHnain-t is west of Allen Street.
We will provide the above referenced services for a Fixed Fee in the amounts of:
I. Design: Two-Thousand, Seven-Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($2,750.00).
2. Construction Staking: Eight-Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($850.00)
Should the above meet with your approval, please sigl1 bel wand return to
my attention.
ay of 00J'w~ ' 2002
Sincerely,
4i:fcG
By:
Title: WxrlbYie'ge G.v.LWilM.~e.. ky
6'f'Je;([ fn+erprrses~' M~
OFFSITE WATER IMPROVEMENTS (WB No.2) - COST SCHEDULE 1/22102
Cost Schedule:
Phase I
Task
Desi n
Construction Stakin
dministration
Total
;i? r;y.J ~ S ~
Notes:
Plan Inspection
Plans shall be reviewed, with an approval or denial, within seven
(7) business days of submittal.
~
PavmeAt~ Ke/n1bcJ"'5e~"€Yl c-
Paymennhall be made to Woodbridge Community LLC within 30
days of plan -aeeef3tanG6-;-
<:>...?P -;"'11'0-.\
By: Woodbridge Community LLC, an Idaho limited liability company
By: ~'Neill t51ri e LL..C, an Idaho limited liability company,
Its man ge 'I
By: \ - nA. 1-23~D2..
Derick O'Neill, Manager
By: City of Meridian
By:
Br-acl-watsorT,-0tty-Ellgir lee r
~o t>e...-+ D. c:.(),,""~'t J Mc...'jov--
A-t\~ t :
l0\l\'~ G, 8<:..'0) 0('. I C~C\<a 11<-
~ f\?r0! veLA \?,~ CotSV\.c ~ I :
OFFSITE WATER IMPROVEMENTS (WB No.2) - SCOPE OF WORK 1/22/02
Phase I - Engineering
o Design
o Construction Staking
o Administration
Brad W.
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
SUbject:
I finally received ENWs proposal...
The following are the figures with the original to follow by hand delivery..
Design $3,100.00
Const. Staking $1,050.00 {)
Administration $622.50 ~
Total ~o"41~1l2
Gene identifies design for 1,500 approximate feet.
Thank you,
Jim Conger
Conger Management Group
ph: 208.336,5355
fx: 208.336.2282
http://www.congergroup.com
405 South 8th Street, Suite 131
Boise, 10 83702
RECEIVED
Ft:"R 0 1 2002
MERIDIAN CrTY ENGINEER
1