HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-10
c I~', .bL,L. ~ 0 I J,Q'};LJ
'-item Packet Pickup
MEETING DATE:
** TX CDNFi [ON REPORT ** RS OF DEC 11 '02 08'~ PRGE.01
CITY OF MERJDIRN
DRTE TIME TO/FROM MODe MIN/SEC PGS CMO;! STR1US
02 12/11 08'24 3810160 EC--S 01'32" 003 067 OK
133 12/11 08:26 PUBLIC WORKS UF--5 00'45" 0133 067 OK
04 12/11 08:27 121384664405 EC--5 013'57" 003 067 OK
as 12/11 88: 29 2888840744 EC--S 80'55" 003 867 OK
06 12/11 08:31 2088467366 EC--S 00'57" 003 067 OK
07 12/11 08:32 208 838 5501 EC--S 00'55" 003 067 OK
08 12/11 88'33 L[BRRRY EC--S 01'12" 003 067 OK
139 12/11 08'36 IDRHO S1RTE5MRN EC--S B0'55" 003 067 OK
10 12/11 08: 37 208 388 6924 EC--S m'll" 003 1057 OK
11 12/11 08:39 2088886854 EC--S 00'56" 003 057 OK
12 12/11 88:41 89513390 EC--S 013'55" 003 1367 OK
13 12/11 08:42 208 387 6393 EC--S 1313'55" 003 1367 OK
14 12/11 08:44 ADR CTY DEUELMT G3--S 131'4S" 0133 1367 OK
15 12/11 138'46 CHERRY LANE EC--S 01'13" 003 1367 OK
16 12/11 138'48 POST OFF1CE EC--S 131'32" 003 1367 OK
17 12/11 08:513 208 S88 1983 G3--S 01' 16" 01213 1067 OK
18 12/11 08'52 [D PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 013'57" 003 067 OK
19 12/11 138'53 208 888 671313 EC--S 1313'55" 003 067 OK
23 12/11 08'58 8841159 EC--S 130'57" 13133 1367 OK
----------------------------------------~---------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
{J Tammy de Weerd -.L Bill Nary
=:2C: Cherie McCandless --Ii- Keith Bird
-A- Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda: i!LJ'r"~ .
t<t:(d. I~ r -h:c.-~M><T>>J' ~ ,.0 f ~ eo-. tr'T':rh<7>-'
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting: ~~
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council RegUlar
Meeting: <'<ff"'1r<:-
C. findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast comer of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road: arr~
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02.004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Noreo Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairviaw. ~I"<.--
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer: ~>t\<--
F. Sewer and Wator Line Ea5ement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.: &pi' f')f) 'I'C.-
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas: ~r~
H. Sewor Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No.1 - Capital
Development: ~If""l-/
Mi:'ridlM CityCou:c.cjl Agcndl,- Octanba 10. 2002 P.a.s" t .of3
All ""'<riol. p'......d "'publio",...;"" >boll bOOOlllo prOplrty <>fib. CilY .tMeridi>n.
Anycne d.tsiring i\.::.comm()~tiOll r~di8llbiLilkti: related to docurnC'nl" adlCf' heuinS
pl"'...."O""'" llIe C~yCl"'k.. Offi".'t 88s.44~3 'llt"148 00"", llrictlo th. public m,<ling.
*>1< TX CONFIRMATION REPORT >I<)\(
I
AS OF DEe 09 '0215:58 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
26 12/09 15:57 KEITH BIRD
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S '2113' 52" 1303 0le OK
------~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
? Lw.se- 'YO~-t ~ ?u.-tr.W:c.. Ylo+iC<...-1hMt~s!
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI.call Attendance:
_ Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary
Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird
_ Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12.2002 pre..council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02~003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road;
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Noyco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, lnc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water Line Easement, KrisPY Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas:
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital
Development:
McridillD City COIlIlcj[ Agendll- Decembef 10.2002 Page 1 01'3
All mntainlE pt'os~ "'public m.otinll< ,(,0,11 beoomo proporiy .ftlle City of Maidia.t1.
Anyone MSiring accommodation for di6'lbiJitiCll roJ(I1ed 10 documents :lOdlor bellring
plc..c corrut<:t !.he City CleriCS Office .1l 8884433 at least 48 hOUI"$ prier to tlu: public mUlinj;.
V l1ClSe..- V> O<;)~ f,y ? lA-1o(; c nah C0.-1hlL1fI ~ $ !
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
TuesdaYJ December 10J 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26J 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary { Final Plat approval of 1 building
[at on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water Line Easement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas:
H. Sewer EasementJ Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital
Development:
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 1 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
I. Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance - Audio
Electronics, Inc.:
4. Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department:
1. 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension -
Professional Services ContractJ Keller Associates:
2. Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction
Services ContractJ Carollo Engineers:
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. FP 02-026 Request for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots and 1 other
lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for Education Campus Subdivision by
Joint School District NO.2 - east of North Locust Grove Road and north of
East Ustick Road:
7. FP 02-027 Request for Final Plat approval of 60 building lots and 10 other
lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.1
by Gem Park II - west of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory
Road:
8. Public Hearing: TCU 02-001 Request for a Transfer of Conditional Use
Permit for a daycare in an L-Q zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West -
1131 West Cherry Lane:
9. Public Hearing: AZ 02-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
119.83 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road:
10. Public Hearing: PP 02-019 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 328
building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East
McMillan Road and west of North Locust Grove Road:
11. Public Hearing: CUP 02-028 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development with 327 single-family dwellings, one
elementary school, and 27 common lots for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road:
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 2 of3
All materials presented at public meetings shall hecome property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hcaring
pleasc contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
.1
12. Public Hearing: AZ 02-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.06
acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Moshers Farm Subdivision
by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
13. Public Hearing: PP 02-021 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 25
building lots, one existing residence and 8 other lots on 6.06 acres in a
proposed R-8 zone for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision by CMD,
Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
14. Public Hearing: CUP 02-031 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for 25 single-family detached homes and 1
single-family existing home in an R-8 zone for proposed Moshers Farm
Subdivision by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 3 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring acconunodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
I
, {
** TX CONFIRMF, ,,--I REPORT ** AS OF DEC 06 '02 17. PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE J1[N/SEC PGS CMDII STATUS
01 12/06 17'23 Laurel EC--S 00'54" 003 0113 OK
02 12/06 17:25 208 387 6393 EC--5 00'51" 003 010 OK
03 12/06 1'7'26 ADA CTY DEUELMT G3--S 01'42" 003 010 OK
04 12/06 17:28 CHERIE MCCANDLES EC--S 01'135" 13133 010 OK
135 12/06 17:30 CHERRY LANE EC--5 01'04" 13133 010 OK
06 12/06 17:31 POST OFFICE EC--S 61'24" 603 010 OK
137 12/66 17'33 268 888 1983 G3--5 131'14" 6133 016 OK
138 12/06 17:35 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 013'52" 0133 13113 OK
09 12/06 1'7:37 208 888 671313 EC--S 00' 52" 003 010 OK
10 12/06 17:47 KEITH BIRD ----5 00'00" 0013 0113 BUSY
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMDRY
---------------------~---------~---------------------------------------~--------------------
'? l.to.st.. 'V O~-t .w ? u...btA <.. t10h C<.- -1VJCVVl ~ s !
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10. 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
_ Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary
Cherie McCandless Keith Bird
_ Mayor Robert Corrie-
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02~003 Request for Preliminary 1 Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-0D4 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acreS in a CoG zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
{Quenzer Commons} - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water line Easement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas:
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital
Development:
MrridianCityC_,ill\genda - D"b11ber 10. 2002 rage I 01'3
All ....Icriol. pr"C:Ol<d '" foblie m,",n5' <ball .'<>><1\. FJ'>Por1y of lh< Ciiy of MeridiAn.
l\Ily"~' desmog ",,,,,",,od!u.i,,,,,r.,. disobiliti<a ",1",0<1 '0 doculll>mU ...vor b<ntint
pl.... canto.. !he city Clerk's Office aI 888-4433 at lout 48 how. plior to mCIl"Nic m'f\in~
** TX CONF I RM~. ..IN REPORT **
AS OF
(
DEC 06 '02 17:,
PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
20
21
22
23
24
2S
26
28
29
30
31
32
DATE TIME TO/FROM
12/06 17:05 3810160
12/06 17'06 PUBLIC WORKS
12/136 17:08 12084664405
12/136 17:09 8841159
12/136 17'11 20888413744
12/06 17'13 2088467366
12/136 17:14 208 898 5501
12/06 17:16 LIBRARY
12/06 17:17 92083776449
12/136 17:18 208 388 6924
12/06 17:20 2088886854
12/06 17:22 89513390
MODE
EC--S
UF--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
CMDll
010
010
010
010
010
0113
1310
010
010
010
010
1010
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
MIN/SEC PGS
01'24" 003
013'40" 003
00' 52" 003
1313'51" 003
00'51" 003
00'52" 003
013'51" 003
01'05" 1303
00' 51" 1303
01'134" 003
130'50" 0133
00'50" 003
-------------~-------------------------------------~----------------------------------------
? lease., 'VO~-c.f;v- ?~r.. t1.akC0-1hCVVl~S!
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCil REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
_ TammydeWeerd _ Bill Nary
Cherie McCandless Keith Bird
_ Mayor Robert Corrie-
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12,2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
c. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of SoLrth Eagle Road
and East Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a CoG zone for NoreD Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Lino Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water Line Easement, Krispy Krerne - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Une Easement - R.T. Nahas:
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital
Development:
Mmd,..,CityCoUllojl Agonda - o.oomber 10. 2002 Foeolof3
All ""'loti.l'l"o<<=hld "l"'~li<> ",...;na' ,1>>11 bo=nopoopDrty onlle Clf)' ofMotidi>n
AIlyon. desirine;>ecommoohLi"" tor dioobDll,.. 'oto1cd to docummu ..,vor b"";n~
pt..,. contnct tho city Cl<tK'S Ollie. &1882-1433 at least 48 houn prior 101/1. publi.lll.<t;,,~
December 13,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 17, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3 -(.,
REQUEST Approve minutes of December 10, 2002 City Council Regular Meeting:
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATIORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETILERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
{U
WF~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI~call Attendance:
o
X
Tammy de Weerd X
Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve add Item J - recommendations
from P&R Commission
3. Consent Agenda:
A, Approve minutes of November 12, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
Approve
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting: Approve
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02~003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road: Approve
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02~004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview: Approve
E. Off~site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer: Approve
F. Sewer and Water Line Easement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.: Approve
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas: Approve
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page I of3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No.1 - Capital
Development: Approve
I. Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance - Audio
Electronics, Inc.: Approve
J. Recommendations for Park Partnerships by Parks and
Recreation Commission: Approve
4. Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department:
1. 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension -
Professional Services Contract, Keller Associates:
Approve
2. Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction
Services Contract, Carollo Engineers: Approve
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda):
6. FP 02R026 Request for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots and 1 other
lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for Education Campus Subdivision by
Joint School District NO.2 - east of North Locust Grove Road and north of
East Ustick Road: Approve
7. FP 02~027 Request for Final Plat approval of 60 building lots and 10 other
lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.1
by Gem Park II - west of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory
Road: Approve
8. Public Hearing: TCU 02-001 Request for a Transfer of Conditional Use
Permit for a daycare in an L-O zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West -
1131 West Cherry Lane: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
9. Public Hearing: AZ 02~022 Request for annexation and zoning of
119.83 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
10. Public Hearing: PP 02-019 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 328
building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East
Meridian City Council Agenda - December ]0, 2002 Page 2 of3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office a1888.4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
McMillan Road and west of North Locust Grove Road: Attorney to
prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
11. Public Hearing: CUP 02~028 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development with 327 single-family dwellings, one
elementary school, and 27 common lots for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
12. Public Hearing: AZ 02~023 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.06
acres from RUT to R-B zones for proposed Moshers Farm Subdivision
by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road: Attorney to prepare Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
13, Public Hearing: PP 02-021 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 25
building lots, one existing residence and 8 other lots on 6.06 acres in a
proposed R-B zone for proposed Moshers Farm Subdivision by CMD,
Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Approval
14. Public Hearing: CUP 02~031 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for 25 single-family detached homes and 1
single-family existing home in an R-B zone for proposed Mashers Farm
Subdivision by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road: Attorney to
prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10,2002 Page 3 of3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Council Meetin~
December 10, 2002
The Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M., on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, by Mayor Robert Corrie.
Members Present: Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, William Nary, and Cherie McCandless.
Members Absent: Tammy de Weerd.
Others Present: William Nichols, Brad Hawkins-Clark, Brad Watson, Ken Bowers, Mike
Worley, Dean Willis, and Will Berg
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
o Tammy de Weerd X Bill Nary
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Corrie: Okay. I'm going to open the Meridian City Council Regular Meeting for
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., and I would like to have the City Clerk have
roll call attendance, please.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Thank you. Item Number 2 is the adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: With your permission, I would like to add to the agenda under the Consent
Agenda, Item J, which is a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation
Commission for partnerships at the different park locations. The Meridian Youth
Baseball and Settler's PAL Soccer, Lochsa Falls, Meridian Lions Rodeo Club, and the
ice skating rink at the Borup property, if that would be acceptable to you and the total
Council.
Corrie: Okay. Do I hear any objection from Council?
Nary: No.
Corrie: Okay, That would be fine, Mr. Bird. We will add that to the Consent Agenda.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 2 of 37
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: With that, then, I would move that we approve the agenda as noted.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: All right. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the agenda as
corrected. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say
aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 3.
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary / Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary / Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water Line Easement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Line Easement - R.T, Nahas:
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital
Development:
I. Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance - Audio
Electronics, Inc.:
J. Recommendation from the City Parks and Recreation
Department for partnerships.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 3 of 37
Corrie: Item 3 is the Consent Agenda. We do have the addition of Item J.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda, with the addition of Item J,
and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper papers.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda,
with the inclusion of Item J on the Parks recommendation. Any further discussion?
Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Clerk,
Roll Call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. All ayes. Motion approved on the Consent Agenda.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 4.
Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department:
1. 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension -
Professional Services Contract, Keller Associates:
Corrie: Item Number 4 is Department Reports. Item A, Public Works Department. One
is the 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension - Professional Services
Contract, Keller Associates. Mr. Watson.
Watson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Members. I had intended for this to go on
the Consent Agenda, so I won't bore you with the details. What this involves is a
Design Contract with Keller Associates to bring water under the Interstate for the
Touchmark project to the south side of the Interstate, which used to be -- I think it's
called the Elk's property or something like that. It's the southeast corner of the 1-84 and
Eagle Road Interchange and bring water all the way over to Overland Road.
Silverstone Subdivision is right there in that general area. Our modeling has shown that
this is probably -- probably will be a needed connection as Touchmark and Silverstone
develop out and Keller has done a lot of work for us in the past, as you well know. The
estimated construction cost, just ballpark right now, is about 300,000. They are
proposing a Professional Services Agreement of 24,800 and we would recommend
approval of the contract for that amount. I would be happy to answer any questions.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 4 of 37
Corrie: Thank you, Brad questions from Council? Okay. I will entertain a motion on the
req u est.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we enter into a Contract for Professional Services with Keller
Associates for the Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension and for the Mayor to sign
and the Clerk to attest, for a total of 24,800 dollars.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Is there any further discussion?
Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. Opposed no. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
2. Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction
Services Contract, Carollo Engineers:
Corrie: Number 2 Brad.
Watson: Thank you. Item Number 2, again, I was intending for this to be on the
Consent Agenda. It is a Professional Services Contract for construction services of the
DAFT Project for the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Carollo Engineers has completed
the design and it will bid tomorrow. The estimated construction cost is -- according to
Carollo is about 950 to 975,000 dollars. The original design contract was right at
100,000, so this would bring their total contract amount to roughly 175,000 dollars. The
construction services contract is on a time and materials basis. That sums it up. Are
there any questions?
Corrie: Questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay. I will entertain a motion, then, for the request.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the services with Carollo Engineers for construction
services for 74,800 dollars and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest.
Nary: Second.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 5 of 37
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further discussion? Hearing
none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 5.
(Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Corrie: Item Number 5 is items moved from the Consent Agenda. There are none this
evening.
Item 6.
FP 02-026 Request for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots and 1 other
lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for Education Campus Subdivision by
Joint School District NO.2 - east of North Locust Grove Road and north of
East Ustick Road:
Corrie: So we move to Item Number 6. This is a request for Final Plat approval of two
building lots and one other lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for Education Campus
Subdivision by Joint School District No.2, east of North Locust Grove Road and north of
Ustick Road. Brad.
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The Preliminary Plat
for the Education Campus Subdivision just was approved by this body last month, I
believe, so I won't go into too much of the details. We, as staff, have submitted a report
to you, dated December 5, 2002, with some recommended conditions. The property is
already existing city limits, so we are not in any need to wait for a Development
Agreement or Annexation Ordinance to be passed. It is zoned R-4. Here on the screen
is the subdivision. It's simply three lots. They are proposing to construct a new
collector roadway as a part of this Final Plat. The elementary school would be here at
this eastern end. Then, the balance is simply a landscape lot on the North Locust
Grove Road and Block 1, Lot 2, is a 25 acre parcel that will have multiple school
facilities on it, so -- the Fire Department education facility is also part of this plat, so
staffs recommending approval of the final plat and that's alii have.
Corrie: Thank you, Brad. Any questions of Council?
Bird: I have none.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Brad, wasn't there a cutout in the road for the education facility? Where did it go?
Bird: Do you see that little dark area? You can barely see it.
Nary: No, I guess I can't see it.
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 6 of 37
Bird: I think that's what --
Nary: I thought it was on that straightaway where that cutout was and we talked about
that --
Hawkins-Clark: Yes the plat was not affected by that.
Nary: Oh.
Hawkins-Clark: It's simply sort of a private cutout, if you will.
Nary: Okay.
Hawkins-Clark: Right.
Nary: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Is the representative of the school system here this evening? Have you step up
and identify yourself and then answer questions.
Fluke: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you very much. Daren Fluke, JUB
Engineers.
Corrie: Okay. Do you have anything you want to add to this or any objections to
anything?
Fluke: It's pretty straightforward. We are in agreement with the staff report. We surely
appreciate the city's effort in moving this along. Staff has been great to work with and
we hope to have that school open this fall.
Corrie: Okay very well any questions from Council? Okay. Thank you very much.
Fluke: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. With that, I will entertain a motion, then, on the request for Final Plat of
the Education Campus Subdivision, Item FP 02-026.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I move the approval of FP 02-026, request for Final Plat approval of two building
lots and one other lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for the Education Campus
Subdivision by Joint School District NO.2 for Findings?
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 7 of 37
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, it's actually an Order of Conditional
Approval for Final Plat.
Nary: That's what we -- I'm sorry and for Council to prepare order for the Final Plat
Conditions of Approval and I think that's it.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the request of the Final
Plat any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Three ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 7.
FP 02-027 Request for Final Plat approval of 60 building lots and 10 other
lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.1
by Gem Park II - west of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory
Road:
Corrie: Item Number 7 is a request for Final Plat approval of 60 buildings lots and 10
other lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No. 1 by Gem
Park II, west of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory Road. At this time I will
invite --
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Mayor, Members of the Council. The subject property is
the first phase of Messina Hills Subdivision. It is on 34.44 acres. The density of the
subdivision is a proposed 2.03 dwelling units per acre. The City Council did approve
the Preliminary Plat on this in August of this year. It originally came through as part of
the Tuscany Lakes Subdivision. Here is a copy of the proposed Final Plat and it is in
substantial conformance with the Preliminary Plat. Staff has recommended conditions
in a December 5, 2002, memo. I believe most of them are standard conditions.
Generally, this phase does include a proposed elementary school lot here at the south
end of the phase. As you may recall, the previous -- last month the Final Plat was
approved here on the south side of this new collector roadway coming in off of South
Eagle Road, so the subdivision will continue that. There is an ingress-egress easement
that is a common lot that is platted here on top of the collector roadway. The
Ridenbaugh Canal abuts the western boundary of this phase. This lot here, Lot Number
2 up in the northeast corner, is a city well lot that is being dedicated to the city for a new
well to service this south side of Victory Road. They have a couple of other common
lots. There is a fairly large common lot that is a combined storm water retention lot here
near the school that will have a facility in it. I believe they had a proposed basketball
court as a part of their amenities for the subdivision. Staff is recommending approval
and with that I will stand for any questions.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page a of 37
Corrie: Any questions of Council?
Bird: I have none.
Hawkins-Clark: I'm sorry. I did have one change to the staff memo that was submitted
by Joe Silva, dated December 3rd. I did talk with Joe before this and he had -- on Item
Number 8 on his staff memo, he had recommended that a stub street be extended
called Montague Avenue, which doesn't exist in this plat, so he simply said that was an
oversight on his part, just a copy from a previous report. That last sentence on Item
Number 8 of Joe Silva's memo does need to be deleted as a condition of this plat.
Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Is the representative here this evening name and address,
Kent?
Brown: For the record, my name is Kent Brown. I work with Briggs Engineering and
our address is 1800 West Overland, Boise, Idaho.
Corrie: Do you have any additions or comments or --
Brown: Just would like to add to what Daren had said earlier. We really appreciate staff
and what has gone on on this plat. They have been very helpful in helping us move this
forward, we are hoping to go into construction really soon and they are making great
efforts to try to help us to do that. We'd like to get this sewer and water in the ground
this winter and we have about three miles of sewer, I think, that we have to do to get all
the way over to this point and so forth and are very grateful -- my client wanted me to
echo that. That we are appreciative and his comment was is that Meridian is the nicest
jurisdiction to work in right now. He wanted you to know that and the efforts that you
have made to make that happen so we have no comments about the conditions.
Corrie: We certainly appreciate that any questions of Council?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Thank you, Kent. Okay. With that, I will entertain a motion, then, if there is no
more discussion on the Messina Hills Subdivision No.1 and Final Plat 02-027.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve FP 02-027, request for Final Plat approval of 60
building lots and 10 other lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills
Subdivision NO.1 by Gem Park II. West of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory
Road and eliminate Comment Number 8 by the Fire Department in this phase and for
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 9 of 37
the attorney to draw up Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision and
Order.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Is there any further discussion?
Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, nay; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. With two yes' and one no, the motion is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: TWO AYES, ONE NAYE, ONE ABSENT
Item 8.
Public Hearing: TCU 02-001 Request for a Transfer of Conditional Use
Permit for a daycare in an L-O zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West -
1131 West Cherry Lane:
Corrie: Number 8 is a Public Hearing. This is a request for a transfer of a Conditional
Use Permit for a day care in an L-O zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West, 1131 West
Cherry Lane. At this time I will open the Public Hearing and invite staff's comments first.
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Mayor, Members of the Council. The applicant, Joni West,
has requested a transfer of the Conditional Use Permit that has run -- that has run with
the land here at this property located at 1131 West Cherry Lane for several years. It's in
the past been known as Kinder Kollege. It is located there on the corner of Northwest
11th and West Cherry Lane. The existing zoning is Limited Office. It does require a
Conditional Use Permit to operate a childcare facility. The ordinance does require that
commercial day cares come before the City Council in order to transfer the permit. The
conditions that were previously approved with the Kinder Kollege project would remain
with this proposed day care operated by the applicant. This is the second time that the
day care Conditional Use Permit has been requested to be transferred to a new
occupant here at this location, so at this point I think the only change --I noticed that the
staff report from David McKinnon, dated December 4th, doesn't have a file number in the
subject. I'm assuming the clerk can kind of take care of that. Since there really are no
proposed changes to the site in terms of parking or landscaping modifications, the staff
has not recommended any specific conditions to be added to this transfer. I think that's
all we had on that one.
Corrie: Thank you, Brad any questions from the Council? Okay. Is the representative
here tonight? I notice Joni is here so, Joni, if you would come up and give us your
name and address, please, for the record.
West: My name is Joni West and my home address or -- 2132 West Chateau Drive.
Corrie: Okay. Anything you want to say? Just want the transfer?
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 10 of 37
West: I'd just like -- yes.
Corrie: Okay any questions of Council?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay. All right. Thank you.
West: Thank you.
Corrie: Michelle, would you like to -- is there anyone here from the audience that would
like to testify for the project? Michelle, would you like to -- you can if you like. Okay. All
right. Is there anyone else from the audience that would like to testify? Okay. Hearing
none, I will entertain a motion, then, to close the Public Hearing.
Bird: So moved.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to close the Public Hearing on the
request for transfer of Conditional Use Permit Number 02-001 any further discussion?
All those in favor of the motion say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Any further discussion? Okay. Then I will entertain a motion on the request for
transfer.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the TCU 02-001, the request for the transfer of a
Conditional Use Permit for a day care in an L-O zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West
and for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and
Decision and Order.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the request for transfer
of Conditional Use Permit Number 02-001 any further discussion? Hearing none, roll
call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: All ayes. Motion carried. Approved.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 11 of 37
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 9,
Public Hearing: AZ. 02-022 Request for annexation and zoning of
119.83 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road:
Item 10.
Public Hearing: PP 02-019 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 328
building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East
McMillan Road and west of North Locust Grove Road:
Item 11,
Public Hearing: CUP 02-028 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development with 327 single-family dwellings, one
elementary school, and 27 common lots for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road:
Corrie: Number 9, Number 10 and Number 11 is a Public Hearing. There are three
requests. Request for annexation and zoning of 119.83 acres from RUT to an R-4 zone
for proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC, south of East McMillan Road
and west of North Locust Grove Road. There is also a request for Preliminary Plat of
the 328 building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres. Then there is also a Public
Hearing for a request for a Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development for
327 single-family dwellings, one elementary school, and 27 common lots for the
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision. With the permission of the Council, I would like to
open all three of those Public Hearings at one time and, then, if anybody has any
testimony, then, they can take them all at the same time, if Council does not have
objection to that. Okay so I will open the Public Hearing on all three, on 9, 10, and 11,
and invite Council -- staff to comment first.
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Mayor, Members of the Council. The first Item Number 9,
the annexation and zoning request, is to annex into the city with an R-4 zone. The
property boundary is outlined in bold there. It does involve a -- five different current
property owners -- or parcel numbers. I'm sorry. The Planning and Zoning Commission
did review the request for annexation and zoning and does recommend approval with
the R-4 zone request for the full 119.83 acres. Recommendation has been submitted to
you on that. Here is the aerial photo of the land as of last year. Existing agricultural
uses, sod farm, et cetera. There are rural residential uses abutting the proposed project
here called Crestwood Estates Subdivision that abuts here on the north. These are five
acre -- existing five-acre parcels. The property does have frontage on McMillan Road,
as well as North Locust Grove Road. Largely, the project is internal to the section. The
Heritage Commons Subdivision abuts Havasu Creek here on the south side and that's
under construction now. They do have two proposed stub streets that they are
connecting to down here in terms of Heritage Commons. Other existing rural
agricultural parcels here that are not part of the subdivision. On Item Number 10, the
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 12 of 37
Preliminary Plat request, here on the screen is a copy of the plat as they have proposed
it and it has been modified per the Planning and Zoning Commission request. There
were several modifications that they had requested and staff did receive a revised plat.
I will let the applicant's representative Becky Bowcutt kind of touch on most of the
highlights. They are proposing a new collector roadway that would enter here off of
McMillan Road and they have several open areas within the subdivision, a large 1.4-
acre area here. They do have a proposed elementary school site, just a little over 12
acres, that takes access off of the new collector road on the east side of that collector.
On the Locust Grove frontage there is also a portion of the collector that comes in here.
They have larger lots at the southern end of their subdivision that -- with a little more
higher density up toward the north. They are proposing detached sidewalks within the
entire subdivision, The open area lots -- it is approximately five percent of the entire
subdivision that's usable open space on this. That does not include the school site or
any of the other required buffer areas. The single-family lots do range from about 6,820
square feet to 17,700 square feet in size. They have an overall density of about 3.8 net
gross density about 3.0 dwelling units per acre. They have proposed, as you have seen
on Tuscany Lakes and a couple of other subdivisions, a different phasing program,
where they are proposing to begin the subdivision both on McMillan Road with a 1-A
Phase, as well as Locust Grove Road with a 1-B Phase. They would, essentially, have
construction begin on two different elements of the subdivision there. The Planned
Development request, Item Number 11, does involve amenities and they are proposing
two playground equipment facilities, a pathway system, a water feature, and a gazebo
picnic facility. All those would be located on their various open space common lots
within the subdivision. Staff understands that the Meridian School District is looking
probably around 2005, depending, of course, on bonds, to construct that elementary
school, should this be approved. The Conditional Use Permit does involve a condition
placed by the Planning and Zoning Commission that the applicant works with the
property owners on fencing. They had requested vinyl fencing at the Planning and
Zoning Commission and they were -- the applicant was asked to kind of coordinate with
them on that and I understand that they have done that, so we can hear from the
applicant on how that worked out. Just a couple of items to point out on the
recommendation -- on the Preliminary Plat recommendation. Given that there are
detached sidewalks here, I think staff is recommending that the front setbacks for these
lots be measured from the back edge of the sidewalk and not the property line. We
propose a new condition on Page 4, Item Number 11 that just simply states that, that
the front setbacks shall be measured from the back edge of the sidewalk, so that we get
the appropriate 15-foot setback otherwise, it would be less than that if it were measured
from the property line. We have received a written response from Becky Bowcutt dated
today and she has outlined several items there. I haven't had a chance to review this in
detail. I can do that. I think Brad has, have you -- we could both look at that while the
applicant is presenting and come back if we have any concerns, if that's okay.
Corrie: Thank you, Brad. Council, do you have any questions at this point?
Bird: I have none.
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 13 of 37
Corrie: Okay. Becky. Is the testimony you're about to give the truth, the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Bowcutt: I do.
Corrie: Name and address for the record, please.
Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt, 1100 East Valli-Hi, Eagle, and I'm representing the applicant
in this matter. This is a piece of property that's just due north of Heritage Commons.
The two southern stub streets here will tie into the Heritage Commons project, which
goes on out and intersects with Locust Grove Road. As you well know, the White Drain
Trunk came from the west and then traversed through the Heritage -- or to the Heritage
Commons project. This property -- the majority of this property will sewer down into that
White Drain Trunk. As far as facilities are concerned, there is a break point back here
on this western boundary of the elementary school where there are two water pressure
zones based on your water-modeling map. We have been working with your Public
Works staff concerning what -- how we will handle that and which mains would need to
be extended to serve which portions of this project. We have also been working with
your staff -- this portion here -- or a majority of this western -- or northwest portion that
fronts up on McMillan Road cannot gravity back into this White Drain Trunk. It will
however, when the property to the west, the Starkey property, is developed, it would
gravity through the Starkey property out to Meridian Road. In the interim, in our
discussions with the staff, one thing that was suggested was that we have just a
temporary lift station that would -- everything would gravity back to this western
boundary, then, it would be pumped back into these mains going down into the White
Drain Trunk. At such time as this property were to be developed, that would be
eliminated or abandoned and then it would gravity the normal way, so we are not -- we
are still complying with the way these mains are going to flow, it's just a matter of timing
and how the property develops next to us. When we started this project, we had a
neighborhood meeting and we met with all the residents, because we are surrounded
by five and 10 acre parcels. It's really hard for us to buffer from these properties, so the
neighborhood meeting went quite well. We had probably the best bunch of neighbors
that I have seen in years. Very understanding, very willing to work with us, very
accepting of a new development in their vicinity. I would like to submit into the public
record some letters that we did send out to the three residents that we most affect. One
was Vanessa Klaus, the other was Lonnie Johnson, and the other resident was Mr.
Graham. Their concern -- they had like 10 -- there is a five-acre lot and then a couple of
10-acre lots here. We have agreed that these lots along their western boundary from
here up, which would be lots one through eight, Block 12, according to the Preliminary
Plat, will be single-story homes. We will also construct either five or six foot vinyl
fencing along this boundary, because they did not want wood fencing and so we did
send these letters. I do want to admit this into the public record, with a picture, also, of
the single-story lots, because those lot and block numbers do change from Preliminary
to Final but we worked with our neighbors. I think we have ironed out all of our issues,
irrigation issues, and drainage issues. The school district approached us when we
started this and stated that they wanted to have an elementary school site, so we did
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 14 of 37
incorporate the school site. They said they wanted to be up toward McMillan, but not
directly on McMillan Road, and we had designed a collector road that will come down to
this intersection. This design you see here for the elementary site with their parking lot
came from their architects, it was not from our engineer. They, obviously, have
evaluated it for signing and as far as their approaches lining up with our intersection our
pleased. We have three pedestrian pathways that come into the school site. This
pathway here was relocated during the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting just a
little bit north up to this area to facilitate bringing a sewer service through here and up to
here for service for these -- some of these five acre parcels in the future. We had, I
think, approximately 13 stub streets, because we have so many properties that adjoin
us. As you can see, we tried to, in conjunction with Ada County Highway District and
your staff, come up with the best location, so that we can have the best interconnection
possible. On your Comprehensive Plan, this area here is designated low density
residential, three or less dwelling units per acre, and everything from here over to the
east is designated medium density residential, which is four to eight dwelling units per
acre. We did follow that Comprehensive Plan in our design. Our smaller lots start over
here in this Locust Grove area and as we head west and then we head south, the lots
get larger and larger. These range at about that 6,500 square foot range. I believe their
widths are 60 to 68. We have 110 foot -- 110 to 120 foot depth. As we head eastward,
they go from about 7,800 to 10,500 and then they starting going up to nine and 12,000
square feet. I think our largest is 19,000 square feet. We tried to have a real pedestrian
friendly environment here with the detached sidewalks, making it as easy as possible
for these kids to get to the school. We have a pathway through here and we have got
our three paths here. As you can see -- as you come from Locust Grove, we have got
pathways coming through these common areas here and leading right into the school
site. We added a pedestrian path right here through this block during the hearing
process, so we also have pedestrian pathways coming through here, here, and then up
into these pocket parks. We tried to use these centrally located pocket parks. We
thought that they would be more usable, especially where we are going to have play
equipment. This is our largest one. It's about, I think, approximately an acre and a half
or a little bit less. This would be a real good candidate for like the play equipment. It's
got good exposure with lots all the way around it, access from two different directions,
and we talked about putting our other play equipment down here. These will be
commercial type play equipment, ranging from 12,000 to 20,000 dollars in value. We
also want to put like a gazebo park -- picnic area down in that location and create some
nice amenities. This development does not have any mixed uses, but it does have
mixed residential, and that's what it is designated on your Comprehensive Plan. Our
density, as Brad indicated, falls right in line with what you guys want to see in this area.
Our net density is about 3.92 dwelling units per acre and that is when we exclude right
of way and the school. Moving on to the staff comments. Oh, first, before I forget,
under -- on Page 2 of the annexation and zoning recommendation, it says -- Item B, it
says that Planning and Zoning and engineering staff recommendation and it goes site
specific -- that's Ada County Highway District recommendation, just for the record. I
wanted to get that modified. We did review the comments from the City
Attorney and the only thing that we would ask, under Preliminary Plat site-specific
comment, there was a condition asked for 1-A, 2-A, and 3-A, with the word shall be
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 15 of 37
served by the temporary lift station. We have been doing a lot -- a lot of analysis and
design on the project and we may be able to gravity the phase 3-A area, so we wanted
to, obviously, leave that door open, if Mr. Watson was in agreement, and it would not
cause any problems with capacity of the lines or so forth. We'd like to be able to have
that flexibility to work with your staff on that. The other one, they had a reference to a
construction easement. We just wanted some clarification on that. All other comments
we were in agreement with. Under general Comment Number 9, we just need that 25-
year changed to 100 year -- that's one that has been popping up in the staff report -- so
it's consistent with ACHD. Under recommendations of Ada County Highway District, the
only thing I ask is that the Council add some language that we comply with Ada County
Highway District requirements as submitted or as expressly modified by ACHD,
because they are coming back on us. You modified these right away that they are
wanting, so we are trying to work with them on that. Then under the Fire Department,
Item C-8, we will have a temporary gravel access road when we bring our sewer in from
the south. We'd like that to double as, obviously, a temporary emergency vehicle
access and if they are constructed 20 feet wide and can handle 75,000 GVW, then, they
do meet the Fire Code. Of all the other recommendations, we go down to -- we were
okay, except the Conditional Use Permit, Item A. This popped up at the Planning and
Zoning Commission where one of the neighbors stated we don't want to see this just be
fallow and dirt flying everywhere. You only develop say 10 acres of it and the remaining
90 some acres are just going to weeds and dirt. They asked the Commission if there
was a possibility that they could encourage that there be some type of cover crop on
those areas that are not currently being developed. The applicant is not opposed to
this, but we do sometimes have problems or conflict where we have live or drainage
ditches that are cut off by our phase configuration and there may be one area that we
can't, obviously, get water to. We will attempt to retain groundwater -- or ground cover
as much as possible. Obviously, dust management for the neighbors' sake, but I think
to mandate that we have to have some alfalfa planted in there or whatever, that's a
tough one and I have never had that condition placed upon me before. Do you have
any questions?
Corrie: Okay evidently none at this point.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: We do have one. Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mrs, Bowcutt, what's the date of the plat, so that I got the right one?
Hawkins-Clark: November 27, 2002.
Bowcutt: That's correct.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 16 of 37
Nary: Mrs. Bowcutt, so on that condition -- because J thought that was a little curious
about that cover crop -- I heard you say that the developer wasn't opposed to that, just
-- do you want the language maybe not to be too restrictive? Is that what your concern
is?
Bowcutt: Correct because I think -- I think the language -- it mandated it -- or the
condition did and if we had one particular area that we could not physically irrigate,
then, we would be in trouble, we, obviously, would not be in compliance with our
conditions of approval. We want it encouraged and -- but not, I guess, mandated, is the
only word J can come up with, because -- the applicant shall be required to maintain a
cover crop on any land not being developed or until the infrastructure for that phase is
started. It is -- I mean there is no room for any latitude whatsoever. We are not
opposed to the condition we would just like some modification to give us some flexibility.
If we can't -- if we are cut off and we can't water a portion of it, I don't know what -- how
we can maintain a cover crop but that does not mean that we are still not responsible for
dust management, weed management, et cetera. We will do our very best and we had
told the neighbors that, too, to keep a crop on it as long as possible, until we absolutely
need do begin construction.
Nary: So would it be, I guess, your preference that it say something more like as much
as possible or something more like that? Is that what you're talking about?
Bowcutt: Yes. Yes.
Nary: And I guess my only concern -- and that makes sense to me as well, but did
those neighbors leave that Planning and Zoning hearing thinking that it's going to be
mandatory and if we change that, that -- that's not what they had expected at the time. I
mean --
Bowcutt: I can't -- you would have to look at the minutes to see exactly what the
verbiage was in the motion.
Nary: I assume that.
Bowcutt: J'm not sure if it was this strong or not.
Nary: Well, in looking at the minutes -- and I'm just doing that quickly, it seems like
there was a lot of discussion on the fence.
Bowcutt: Yes and we have resolved that. We have agreed to the vinyl fencing that they
wanted.
Nary: Okay. All right. I will just take a look at that and we can talk about it again if we
need to.
Bowcutt: Thank you.
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 17 of 37
Corrie: Becky, you don't have any problem with Mr. Hawkins-Clark -- the 15-foot
setback requirement?
Bowcutt: From -- oh, the 20-foot setback from the back of the sidewalk. No, sir. No,
sir. We are in agreement.
Corrie: We were talking about a 15-foot setback from the sidewalk -- back of the
sidewalk. Any other questions? Okay. Thank you, Becky. [s there anyone else from
the public that wouJd like to issue testimony at this time? [s the testimony you're about
to give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Graham: Yes, it is.
Corrie: Name and address for the record, please.
Graham: Laird Graham, 4191 North Locust Grove Road, Meridian. [was a part of that
Planning and Zoning discussion regarding the cover crop and I'm not here to dispute
what Ms. Bowcutt just said. We are concerned that there be some dust abatement
done, because we lie directly to the east of what is most likely to be a final phase of the
project, as I understand it. I didn't quite follow what she was talking about when she
said cut off from irrigation water. The portion of ground that J'm most concerned about
has been watered by well the whole 12 years that I have been familiar with it. I assume
those wells are still operational and that they have the right to use the water from those
wells, so long as they need to. [would just make that point, that the scheme is blocking
-- well, the part of the -- the problem -- my property lays about where the words Havasu
Creek are and so it's the ground immediately to the west of that that I'm concerned
about. Then Mrs. Bowcutt did mention something, which I'm not familiar with, and I'm
kind of looking for clarification. Evidently, they are giving a sewer stub to some five-acre
parcels that are part of our subdivision to the north of us. J have just raised the question
where this project and its existence [eaves the parcels to the east of this project relative
to sewer. Perhaps [ should know that. ['m standing up here, but I'm asking if there is
something that needs to be addressed there before it's approved.
Corrie: Okay. All right. I will ask her. Anybody else like to issue testimony? Hearing
none, Becky?
Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, to answer Mr. Grahams'
question, one of the questions was the fact that a portion of this property has been
watered by an existing well. Yes, there is an existing irrigation well on the property.
The property owner that this parcel is being purchased from, which is Mr. Ham? Mr.
Ham is retaining that well and water right. He would not sell that and so we will be
relying, obviously, on the gravity irrigation sourcing out of the Settler's main canal up
along McMillan for our irrigation purposes so that if it's -- it's not as easy just to use that
well, since we don't have the right to do it. Concerning sewer, wherever we have stub
streets, if physically possible and if designated on your Facility Plan, your staff has put a
sewer service or connection going to those undeveloped properties. I believe the
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 18 of 37
parcels that are on our eastern boundary that go out to Locust Grove I believe they are
supposed to be gravity to Locust Grove. Now, Brad may correct me on that, but that
was my understanding. You may ask Mr. Watson that question.
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council Members, I was studying the Facility Plan Map. The
parcels to the east -- the Facility Plan in this area in somewhat general, but ultimately
they are designated to go south down to the White Trunk as being constructed in
Quenzer Commons or Heritage Commons. There is one -- one of those lots does look
like it's supposed to go to the west, but there is a stub street there. They will be carrying
sewer to that end of that stub street. Hopefully, that clears things up.
Corrie: Any questions of Council on the Public Hearing record?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess, Becky, I'm looking at the minutes and the discussion about the cover
crop issue that Mr. Graham has brought back again tonight as well. It doesn't seem like
there is -- at least on the portion I'm looking at -- a big discussion about the water at the
time. Is it just -- is it just you want some language just to cover the fact that as long as
there is irrigation available or something like that? Is that what you are talking about?
Bowcutt: Yes. Yes. That would be -- that would be acceptable. We just don't want a
condition that, obviously, we can't comply with in the event that we can't get access to a
particular ditch due to the phase lines.
Corrie: Is Kenny still here? Kenny, the recommendation of the Meridian Fire
Department Number 8, requests two points of ingress and egress over 30 homes and
the applicant does not oppose this, but would like a temporary sewer access road to be
utilized for this. Do you have any problem with that?
Bowers: Mayor Corrie and City Council Members, no, we do not have any problem with
using that sewer easement.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you any other questions? Okay. With that being the case, I will,
therefore, entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on the request for annexation,
the request for Preliminary Plat, and the request for a Conditional Use Permit of Havasu
Creek Subdivision.
McCandless: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 19 of 37
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to close the Public Hearing on 9,
10, and 11 any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Discussion?
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess I don't really have any concerns with this project. I think it's a very nice
development for our community. It sounds like most of the conditions are some real
minor language and I guess the only one that would be semi-contentious is this idea of
the cover crop. I did think it was a little odd at first as well. I understand the neighbors'
concerns. It sounds to me like it's something that -- a condition that's existing and,
obviously, needs to reflect that it has to be possible. I recognize I saw in the minutes
that there was some discussion at the Planning and Zoning that, obviously, there is not
a cover crop year around on that property. You're trying to -- basically trying to limit
some dust, have some dust control and such so I think the condition, with some minor
tweaking, just to make sure that they can comply with it, so that we don't end up back
here arguing over some minor little thing in compliance. I don't see any reason we can't
go forward on this project.
Corrie: Okay. Any other comments? Okay. If there is not other comments?
Hawkins-Clark: Excuse me, Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Brad.
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you. Just want to point out, we have reviewed Mrs. Bowcutt's
letter that was submitted just today. Most everything looks fine to staff. There was a
comment made about single-story homes that I don't believe is in either her comments
or -- should the City Council choose to adopt the changes that Mrs. Bowcutt is
proposing, that Lots 1 through 8, Block 12, being single-story, wasn't in either one.
We'd like that to be added, so that we can enforce that appropriately.
Corrie: What block was that again, Brad? There was Lots 1 through 8. What's the
block nu mber?
Hawkins-Clark: I believe it's 12.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 20 of 37
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, in the past we have drawn up these
conditions with regard to single stories. We have also -- essentially, it's been a 25-foot
maximum height limitation from grade.
Corrie: Thank you, Mr. Nichols. Any other comments? Okay. Hearing none, I will
entertain a motion on, first, the request for annexation and zoning of the Havasu Creek
Subdivision.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I move that we approve AZ 02-022, the request for annexation and zoning of
119.83 acres from RUT to an R-4 zone for the proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by
Farwest, LLC. To include all staff comments, as well as the comments by the
developer's representative submitted that evening, dated December 10, 2002 -- and,
Brad, you're going to have to help me, but I don't recall on the annexation that there was
any proposed changes.
Hawkins-Clark: That's correct.
Nary: Okay. Thank you and for Counsel to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions
of Law and Decision and Order.
Bird: I will second that.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded for approval with all staff
comments and the comments by the developer's representative. Any further
discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. Motion is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Item Number 10 is a request for preliminary.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I would move the approval of CUP 02-019, request for Preliminary Plat approval
of 328 building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 21 of 37
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC. To include all staff comments,
as well as comments by the developer's representative dated today's date, December
10, 2002, with the amendment that appears to be to Site-Specific Comment Number 1
in regards to Phase 1-A, 2-A and 3-A regarding a temporary lift station to -- well, as is
stated here by the developer's representative in the comments. I was seeing if there
was any other -- that would be in general Comments Number 9, that the 25-year
reference to the flood plain be changed to the 100-year flood designation and that the
Highway District recommendation basically including any alterations that may come
along. As well as with the notations that were made in here by developer's
representative under items from Highway District's one and two, as well as the Fire
Department Number 8. I think that's all of the notes I had on the Preliminary Plat.
Bird: I believe that this Preliminary Plat should have the 25-foot tall --
Nary: Oh. Correct.
Bird: -- buildings on Block 12, Lots 1 through 8. Not to exceed 25 feet.
Nary: Yes. That we add a specific condition also that Lots 1 through 8 on Block 12 be
single story homes with a height limitation of 25-foot limit from grade and that would be
added to the site specific comments and for the attorney to draw up Findings of Facts
and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order. I think Mr. Willis adds that anyway.
Bird: I will second that motion, then.
Corrie: Thank you, Mr. Willis. Motion has been made to include all staff comments and
the developer's comments with the amendments as stated. Any further discussion?
Roll call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. Motion is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Item Number 11 is the request for a Conditional Use Permit.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary,
Nary: I move the approval of CUP 02-028, request for Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for 327 single-family dwellings, one elementary school, and
27 common lots for proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC. To include
all staff comments, as well as developer comments dated December 10, 2002, with the
following amendments. In regards to Item A-1, that we also include -- the current
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 22 of 37
language says the applicant shall be required to maintain a cover crop on any land not
being developed. We also include language that as irrigation water is available or until
the infrastructure for that phase is started. Number 2, that we deleted the portion of the
condition that talks about wood fencing, since they have reached an agreement there
will be vinyl fencing. Let me see if there is any other -- I don't have any other notes of
any other amendments besides those two so for staff to prepare Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order.
Bird: I will second that one, too.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Is there any further discussion?
Hearing none -- I will not repeat the motion. Okay. Mr. Berg, roll call vote, please.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. All approved. Motion is carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 12.
Public Hearing: AZ. 02-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.06
acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision
by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
Item 13.
Public Hearing: PP 02-021 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 25
building lots, one existing residence and 8 other lots on 6.06 acres in a
proposed R-8 zone for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision by CMD,
Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
Item 14.
Public Hearing: CUP 02-031 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for 25 single-family detached homes and 1
single-family existing home in an R-8 zone for proposed Mashers Farm
Subdivision by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
Corrie: Item Numbers 12,13, and 14, if Council doesn't object, we will open the Public
Hearing in all three of these, since it is Mashers Farm Subdivision. Item Number 12 is a
request for annexation and zoning. Item Number 13 is a request for Preliminary Plat
and 14 is a request for a Conditional Use Permit. We will follow the same procedure,
hearing no discussion on that, and I will open the Public Hearing on Items 12, 13, and
14 and invite staffs comments first.
Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The subject
applications, Mashers Farm Subdivision, on Item Number 12, the annexation and
zoning request, is to an R-8 zone. The property is located on North Ten Mile Road. It is
on the east boundary of Chaparrel Elementary's property. It is south of what is currently
being constructed as the Berkeley Square Subdivision, which also has an R-8 zone. It
is -- there is undeveloped land adjacent to the east. That was, a couple years ago, as
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 23 of 37
most of you may recall, known as Vallerie Heights project, these two parcels here. The
Ten Mile sub drain abuts the project here to the south side so the Planning and Zoning
Commission did review the annexation request and they did recommend approval to the
R-8. Here is an aerial photo of the existing conditions out there. There are -- there is
an existing residence, as well as some out buildings. Ten Mile Road is there on the
east side. Pine Avenue is public here on the east side of Ten Mile and still remains
private, not a part of ACHD's public system, on the west side of the street. Item Number
13 deals with the Preliminary Plat. There are 26 proposed building lots and six other
lots. They are proposing a Planned Development, so they do have amenities on a part
of their subdivision. They are also, as part of the Planned Development, requesting
some changes to -- to setbacks, in particular for the existing house that is there, which
is here in the southeast corner of their project, due to the existing set-up, they are
asking for a 12 foot rear setback, as opposed to the standard 15 for that existing house.
They are proposing lot sizes ranging from 4,000 to about 7,800 square foot. That is
detached and attached housing. They are also requesting a minimum house size to be
changed from 1,300 square foot, which is the R-8 standard, to 1,150. Basically, as you
can tell, they have no stub streets to utilize for this -- for this parcel, so they do have two
cul-de-sacs. This plat, I'm sorry, doesn't reflect a modification. They are proposing a
micro path that is here on this east -- I'm sorry, this west end of the cul-de-sac, known as
West Ashley Avenue is what they are proposing the name, and that would connect to
the Chaparrel Elementary School site. As with the previous application we just heard
tonight, there is a temporary sanitary sewer lift station that is going to be constructed as
part of this until the permanent mains come through, the Black Cat Trunk extension.
Public Works has reviewed that and made some proposed conditions there. Here is the
proposed Landscape Plan for the subdivision. They are proposing their common area
to be here along the drain on the south side of the subdivision. Planning and Zoning
Commission did have some discussion about the location of that. It is fairly -- fairly
hidden behind these five lots, buildable lots on the north, given the topography. I
believe they have about an eight-foot difference in elevation. There is quite a contour
from the north end. It drops off pretty substantially to the south and so because of the
topography they are proposing to utilize the south end here for their storm water area,
instead of buildable lots. They still are certainly going to need to bring in some fill for
some of these other areas adjacent to the drain. They do have a micropath that they
are proposing here coming off of Ashley to get down to the open area, as well as a
connection of the cul-de-sac here. The amenities that they are proposing are
essentially those pathways and some playground equipment that would be located in
that common Jot. The Planning and Zoning Commission did include in their
recommendation to you Item Number 9 on Page 2, that the applicant should address
their request -- they are asking for a waiver to tile the Ten Mile sub drain. Staff
recommended that they tile it. That's, of course, ordinance. Planning and Zoning
Commission felt that they could leave it open with the exception of this area right
adjacent to Ten Mile Road, which, of course, would have to be a culvert or some other
construction techniques, so that, you know, you can get the sidewalk across there.
Staff is just asking that the applicant address that with you tonight. We need a
clarification on that issue about the tiling. The Fire Department did recommend that
there be no parking on the cul-de-sacs and I believe the applicant is in agreement with
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 24 of 37
that, so that would be -- that would be painted as such to restrict parking there on those
cul-de-sacs. I think the only change to the recommendation is Item Number 2 on Page
3 needs to be deleted. That is dealing with the pathway. That's in conflict with what the
Planning and Zoning Commission approved. It deals with the width of the micropath
and, essentially, the Commission said they could build a 10-foot wide micropath lot,
instead of a 15-foot wide, and that Item Number 2 says that they have to stay with the
ordinance. That should be struck, if you agree with the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendations for the narrower micropath lot. Oh. Then, I guess,
there is one other additional change and that's on Page 5, Item C-1, and I would agree
with what Becky had asked for on their previous application there for Havasu Creek that
deals with the Highway District's dedication of right of way on Ten Mile Road. Given
their changing -- they are in the midst of determining different road widths and if they
should change it from a 48 to 43 or something, an alternative width. Then, we should
maybe just add a clause there that -- or other widths as required by the Highway
District, so that we are covered and they don't have to come back to modify that
condition if the Ten Mile Road right of way changes. I think that covers my comments.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Any questions from the Councilor--
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Brad, on that micropath issue, I mean are you in agreement with changing that or
are you just saying that they are proposing to change that?
Hawkins-Clark: Councilman Nary, right, the issue comes down to whether or not we
desire some trees to kind of give some canopy effect over the micropaths that we have.
As long they are meandering paths, so that you create pockets where trees can be
planted, if they -- if they went with the 10 foot and just a straight path, that would only
leave you, you know, about two and a half feet or something to plant your trees in. Of
course, a tree is not going to grow in that amount, so you sort of alternate -- you know, I
think in a smaller parcel like this it would work. I think our ordinance is still a good one,
that requires the wider width, but given that this is a Planned Development, you know,
they kind of have some flexibility there.
Nary: And on the issue of the ditch and tiling that, you're saying that they are asking to
not tile it, but the recommendation was to just comply with the ordinance and tile it and
it's play equipment right next to it, isn't it?
Hawkins-Clark: Right.
Nary: For little children. Okay.
Hawkins-Clark: There is a six-foot chain link fence that they have shown that would be
along that whole south boundary.
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 25 of 37
Nary: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Brad, you said they were asking for smaller square foot homes than the
standard R-8 1,350, but 1, 150?
Hawkins-Clark: Yes, sir.
Corrie: Did they give you any reason why they wanted smaller homes on there?
Hawkins-Clark: They did not in the application, I don't believe. For the attached
housing product types that are out there, you know, we have seen that request before.
Many of those do reduce by, you know, a couple hundred feet.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: One more question. In the Berkeley Square Sub that's immediately to the north,
were those smaller attached homes?
Hawkins-Clark: They were attached. They had three, typically, attached, if you recall
there, versus two. Sorry, I don't remember the minimum square footage there, but it
was definitely under 1,301 that we require under ordinance.
Nary: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you. Any further questions? Okay. Is the developer here this evening?
Okay. Is the testimony you're about to give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, so help you God?
Ralphs: It is.
Corrie: Okay. Name and address for the record.
Ralphs: My name is Rod Ralphs. My address is 2730 North Greenbelt Place in
Meridian. I'm here on behaJf of the applicant CMD, Inc. We are a developer here in
Meridian, this is our project, which we are applying for the annexation, and other
approvals as mentioned by staff. Before we get started, I'd like to hand to Council
Members a layout of some of the proposed homes and layouts that we are going to
have in this subdivision. May I approach? J'd like to address just a few of the points
that staff has pointed out in their -- in their findings. I'd like to do that point by point.
Staff is also setting up some equipment, so that the Council can see a modified
Landscape Plan for this particular development. One of the first things pointed out by
staff was we'd like to discuss that park area there to the south of the project. As the
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 26 of 37
Council is aware, this 50-acre project is going to have perimeter fencing. To the north
there where Berkeley Square is located, there is six-foot cedar fence. To the west
where Chaparrel abuts to the property, there is six-foot chain link and the school will be
putting in a gateway that would tie into our micropath that would be proceeding from the
cul-de-sac that you see there on the west. It would proceed on one of these micropaths
to Chaparrel, allowing the children in the subdivision access to the school grounds
directly. Following the property line to the south there along the Ten Mile sub drain,
there is a proposed six-foot chain link fence that goes along that drain, coming up here
to Ten Mile, then making a corner there and then we would be placing a PVC or a vinyl-
type fence there along the road. We noticed the Berkeley Square has a cedar fence in
place right now and we would be open to any suggestion the Council might have,
maybe we go instead of a white that would provide a contrast, maybe some type of a
colored fencing on it. Then, of course, the north boundary has already been addressed.
I tied that into the playground amenities for the following reason. We know that we are
going to have small children in this area and we want to provide for their safety and so
we have provided for fencing and then we also provided an active recreation work area
there in the park area. One of the changes that you will see -- I don't know if we will get
there or not, but on the revised plat, if you go into that cul-de-sac that we have here on
the south, we have actually reconfigured this lot -- and I will approach the screen here.
What the Council will note from the plat that you have in front of you is this particular lot
right here coming down Brittany Court has been reconfigured. Previously, it came down
to right here, which, as staff indicated, there was a very limited access to the park area.
By reconfiguring this lot, we preserve the square footage, but we are also allowing
greater visibility from the cul-de-sac into the park. It's not so much a contained or a
confined area. As we mentioned at the Planning and Zoning Meeting, we are going to
have four-foot see-through fencing along the perimeter of the park, allowing and
creating a feeling of openness. Inside the park area here you will see a bike path. This
will be either an asphalt or a concrete path that will be used for bicycle or pedestrian
enjoyment. As you can see, it comes up through there and, as staff indicated, we are
going to be having a meandering pathway that would allow for the trees. I believe the
City Ordinance is we have got to have a tree every 35 feet and we would be doing that
by allowing space by allowing it to meander. We would also be accomplishing the same
thing over here on the micro path that accesses Chaparrel. The amenities that we want
to provide in here, besides the pedestrian-bike-jogging path, is we want to put in an
active recreation site here. We discussed with Planning and Zoning the possibility of
going with playground equipment, but, then, upon further review, our young ones would
have access to the playground equipment over here in Chaparrel. We want to do
something that would be more complete for the family by putting in something like a half
court basketball court that would be painted and striped to accommodate a half court
basketball, but also a volleyball court. That would be an area that the whole family
could enjoy and, then, we would also be putting in some park benches in this area as
well. We feel that that would address the amenities that the city would have us put into
this development. One of the other points of discussion with staff and also Planning
and Zoning was the issue of tiling the Ten Mile sub drain. As the Council can see, we
have a substantial south property line that runs the length of the entire project. Perhaps
the biggest concern for us in doing this right now is still to the south where the church
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 27 of 37
owns that ground, they still have that in agricultural development -- I shouldn't say
development, they still have that in agricultural crop. That drainage is still needed and
we have no idea when the church would be proposing to develop that area, thus
negating the need to tile it. What we did mention with staff and at the Planning and
Zoning is the need to provide for sidewalks along Ten Mile to provide for pedestrian
safety and we are proposing that we would tile out to a distance that would be
appropriate to accommodate a sidewalk. As you can see from the modified landscape
drawing, we have our sidewalk instead of being right flush with Ten Mile we have them
off the road a ways. Now, we have done that for two reasons. Number 1, we feel it's
esthetically pleasing to the eye to have that meandering effect but, secondly, in our
discussions with ACHD, their initial recommendation was that we go ahead and place
the money into a road trust to apply toward sidewalks at a later time and we don't really
know when that was. We didn't want to have our pedestrians have to wait until ACHD
were to move forvvard on the plan so providing for the safety and to accommodate this,
we have moved the sidewalk off and out of the right of way into the 25-foot landscape
buffer. As the Council can see, the sidewalk comes all the way down to the property
line, which centers there in the ditch. We would be tiling that and it would be graded in
accordance with what Nampa-Meridian would require but there would actually be some
tiling of the sidewalk to keep people off the road. As staff has pointed out, we are
asking for a waiver or a Variance of the requirements to tile the entire ditch at this point.
I also wanted to affirm that we are in complete agreement with Fire Department in
requiring that no parking be allowed in the cul-de-sacs. We can address that in the
CC&R's, as well as by appropriate painting in the cul-de-sacs. The cul-de-sac widths
are appropriate for turn arounds for emergency service vehicles. One of the -- I have
touched on the narrow micro path lots and we can address that if you have some
questions on it, but we want to provide for the drain and we want to provide for the trees
and that's why we have allowed for the meandering effect. Does the Council have any
questions that I can field at this time?
Corrie: Any questions? I have one. I don't want to harp on this too long, but on the
1 ,190 square feet, what is the percentage of homes you're going to have in there of that
size?
Ralphs: Got to have a moment.
Corrie: You're going to have three sizes of homes is that right?
Campbell: Correct.
Corrie: Is the testimony you're about to give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, so help you God?
Campbell: Yes.
Corrie: Name and Address, please.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 28 of 37
Campbell: Doug Campbell, 1661 Shore Line Drive, Boise, Idaho. As far as the 11 -- I
think in the submittal on the 1,150 square feet -- and, basically, we did this over at
Wilkins Ranch and I would say probably 10 to 15 of the lots -- percent of the lots -- the
market will dictate that. I would say probably out of 25 lots you will probably have three
to five lots go that small.
Corrie: Okay and you have three types of homes?
Campbell: We have three types of homes, yes, that range from 1,150 on up.
Corrie: Okay. That answers my question. Thank you. Any other questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay.
Ralphs: There was one other thing I wanted to point out here on the Landscape Plan,
we have the house penciled in there on that lot to the south and we did ask for a
Variance from the 20 to the 12, given the current existing home there on the site.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Would you like to testify? Is the testimony you're about to
give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Atkinson: Yes, it is.
Bird: Okay name and address, please.
Atkinson: Irma Atkinson, 1124 North Lightning Place, which is in Thunder Creek on the
other side of Ten Mile. Okay so you guys were driving the go-carts in the parade and
I'm embarrassed to say, but my therapist will be glad to hear that, because we are still
dealing with the elk costumes from last year. I missed you. I totally missed you. It's
like I read about it, you know, the rumor in The Times that you were going to do that and
I missed it. Alii can think of is I was trying to keep my five year old wrapped up in her
blanket and she would throw it off, go out, get candy and then I would have to bundler
her up and you must have gone by while I was doing that. I mean it embarrasses me
that I missed that, but you don't have to reenact it. Okay, I'm back now. I look at three
things when I look at development. I look at auto traffic, I look at the impact on the
existing neighborhood, and I look at pedestrian safety and so does my Friend Laura
Wilder, who would be here -- and I have her cell phone number, but you haven't taken a
break, so I couldn't call her, because I might have missed something. She's tied up at a
4-H meeting so this is going to be strange, because we are partners in crime, so it's
good that she's not here. She usually covers the county type issues and I cover the city
things, so I have to wear both hats, which is going to be very odd. Okay. The auto
traffic, Laura and I both agree -- Laura lives on that dirt road extension of Pine and we
both agree that that's -- I mean, obviously, there is probably nothing that can be done,
but it's going to be a pain, because the northbound traffic trying to turn left is going to tie
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 29 of 37
up the rest of us that want to get by. It sounds like we will probably have to deal with it.
The impact on the existing neighborhood, if Laura were here -- Laura asked me to
remind the Council and the developers that, as they pointed out, they are very much
adjacent to land thars in agricultural production, with Laura and her family raising
sheep. I forget how many 50 -- I don't know. How much is a herd of sheep -- oh, a
flock. Okay. I grew up next to a farm, but, obviously, I have forgotten those things.
Laura asked me to remind you all that sheep are not quiet and they do have a certain
aroma to them. There was some talk -- and maybe the applicant can clarify that for me,
There was some talk at Planning and Zoning about adding that on the plat or in the
CC&R's, just so that people know they are adjacent to agricultural land and so that there
is no great surprise that it may depend on the wind. It may smell. You wlll hear the
farm animals. I'm not sure what happened to that, but that was very much talked about
at Planning and Zoning. Okay. That was the impact on the existing neighborhood.
Pedestrian safety. Laura and I are both moms whose kids always want to go over to
play at the school, so we were happy to see the micropaths there, as in Berkeley
Square. Laura's big concern -- and, because we are friends, therefore, right now irs my
big concern, too, is children walking on Ten Mile, you know, It would be nice if you all
would decide maybe to waiver the tiling the whole drain thing and require them to tile,
you know, over where their sidewalk is. Laura pointed out at Planning and Zoning that,
you know, it's great to make the northern property owner responsible for the sidewalk up
to the drain and the southern property owner, you know, the church, responsible, but
who is going to actually have to tile over the drain? If you want to cut some deal with
them, that would be great with Laura and me. I think that was it. Questions?
Corrie: Any questions? Okay.
Atkinson: Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you. Rod, you have already talked, so -- anybody else like to issue
testimony? Okay. I guess, Rod, you can come back up and she is asking about adding
on the plat adjacent to agricultural land.
Ralphs: Certainly. Members of the Council -- and as we indicated at the Planning and
Zoning meeting, we were planning on placing that on the face of the plat itself and also
address that in the CC&R's so there would be no complaints with that.
Corrie: Any other questions? Okay.
Ralphs: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay any discussion on the Public Hearing?
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 30 of 37
Bird: I got a question for Brad or -- Brad or Brad. On Ten Mile drain, has it -- have we
ever required a drain to be tiled that you can think of? The drain is a drain it's for run-
off. At the freeway we tiled it, but -- but when you have got -- as Mrs. Atkinson pointed
out, you have got agricultural still trying to -- still having to drain down into that thing,
you go tile it, where is that water going to go?
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, Councilman Bird, I can't cite a specific instance,
but I know that they have tiled -- not big drains before, but certain drains, because they
are required to have loose joints, separated joints, with a gravel pack, so that it still
receives subterranean drainage. I can't site a specific example right now. It's tiled
through Chateau Park, but I think that was more of a want than anything.
Bird: When they did that, Brad, also, they went to the sprinkler irrigation where you
didn't have the flood irrigation, so you don't have the run-off, you get more of it down
into the aquifer than you do sliding into a drain.
Watson: Right and I guess I could point out something that happened with the
subdivision directly north of this project, Berkeley Square. They did have quite a time
designing a drainage system and, again, I can't remember the particulars, that was too
many projects ago, but everything is coming south towards that drain so -- and that's
something that maybe this project has not considered yet. There is a big -- well, I'm
sure they did consider it, but there is some drainage coming from that property up there,
because they had to tile through their property. Hopefully, they have considered it. If
the City Council wants to have it tiled some day when it develops on the south side,
what we have done before is have the first developer post a cash surety for half the cost
of that tiling and so when the second developer comes in, he uses that cash to
complete the tiling. That's just an option that's been used in the past.
Bird: I can't think of any drain ditch, since I have been on the Council, that we have had
tiled. I know we -- in the Corps -- that Corps has requested some of them not be tiled, I
do know that, when we tooked into it. You start losing your ground water. Aquifer. I
don't know. Brad?
Watson: Mr. Mayor and Council Members, one specifically that wilt be required to tile is
the Evens Drain as part of the RC Willey Subdivision. That goes back quite a few
years, but -- because I'm dealing with that issue right now but it will be tiled.
Corrie: Any other questions? Hearing none, I will --
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: I did have one more question just a clarification from Mr. Ralphs, if you please.
With regard to the tiling adjacent to the North Ten Mile for the purposes of extending the
sidewalk, you would just extend the sidewalk, then, I presume to the middle of the drain,
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 31 of 37
put the tiling in and the cover and so forth and just extend the sidewalk, then, to the
middle of the drain to the edge of your property?
Ralphs: Right. Well, the tiling would encompass the entire drain, but the sidewalk
would only come to our property line and it would be graded and it would transition into
adjacent property for whatever Nampa-Meridian would require.
Nichols: Thank you.
Corrie: Any other questions? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the Public
Hearing, then, on Item Numbers 12,13, and 14.
McCandless: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to close the Public Hearing on
Item Number 12, the request for annexation and zoning, Item Number 13, the request
for Preliminary Plat, and Item 14, Public Hearing, request for Conditional Use Permit on
Moshers Farm Subdivision. Further discussion? All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Further discussion? The silence is defining, so I guess nobody has anything to
say, so go ahead and make a recommendation.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I don't know how the other Council people feel. I have problems tiling drain
ditches. I mean I realize they are not -- it's not safe, I mean you don't -- you want to
make them as safe as possible, but they have been around for years. By tiling, all these
ditches we start losing our water into our aquifer and that's a major concern of mine.
Not only that, we also, you know, lose our run-off and we worry about flood plains and
stuff like that. We tile all these -- I realize that you leave a little gap, some stuff for it to
drain down through there, but if it's a major run-off, it's not going to drain down, it's going
to -- you can get some of it to drain down. The others are going to run right on through
somewhere else, so -- I don't know. I don't know how the other Council people feel
about it. Tiling of the drain I -- I could take that out and not -- I mean on the proposal,
but I'd like to hear what you and the other Council people think of tiling the drainage
ditches. The main -- the carriers of the irrigation water, I have no problem doing them,
because they are going out. The drain ditches are a year around source of water.
Corrie: Okay.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 32 of 37
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I would concur with Mr. Bird. I guess I would -- taking the time I have been here,
it's not very common for us to require the tiling of drains, as much as tiling ditches, so I
think there is a reason for that. I think we can discuss that some other time, but I don't
see the necessity with the fencing and the like that's there and the type of, essentially,
the run-off, that is the same need or necessity as there is in a ditch that's got water
running through it. I don't have a big concern in this particular one. I do think that the
developer has come prepared to compromise in tiling a portion of the ditch to provide for
the sidewalk. I think that's a very good compromise. I think that also -- I think overall
this is a very nice project. There is plenty of right of way. I would anticipate, for Mrs.
Atkinson's concern, that they are going to need a turn lane at some point and probably
not in the too far distant future with Berkeley Square and this development, but there is
plenty of room to do it. I -- and in the relative scheme of things in the big picture, it's a
little less expensive to do that than about anything else so at least that's something
that's more realistic to do. The lady in the back could answer that better than I can but it
appears that it's something that can -- that's likely to have to happen. They are already
doing quite a bit already on Ten Mile in trying to curb some of the turns and stuff and
they are putting in a few of those other island type of things that try to keep traffic
flowing. I think that those issues will probably be taken care of. Otherwise, I think this
is a very nice project. I think it's got good connectivity to the school. I like the public
area I think it's a good alteration by the developer to put in a basketball court and some
tables and such then, I think it does provide a variety of use for that location and it is
accessible to the school and the playground equipment is right there. The school has
been very amenable to working with allowing that type of use for their school property. I
guess the only concern I have -- and it's not a huge concern, but I am real concerned
with that frontage of the common area on that cul-de-sac and it's going to be very
difficult to keep cars from parking in it. I think that's going to be a real tough challenge
to make sure that gets taken care of and enforced, to deal with, but that's not enough to
want to deny this project, because I think it's a very good project. [like the house styles
that are there, and in some ways, actually, some of these 1,190 square foot homes that
are proposed on this plan to provide, you know, some fairly large living space. Some of
the two story homes are actually a little bit smaller per floor space, but overall larger. I
think it's a nice project and I think it would compliment the project immediately to the
north of Berkeley Square. I think there are some very good things with that.
Corrie: Any other discussion?
McCandless: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: I'll just say that I concur with all that's said, in particular with Councilman
Bird's question on the drainage. I concur with that.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 33 of 37
Corrie: Okay.
Hawkins-Clark: Excuse me, Mr. Mayor. Could I make a comment? There are two
things that I just want to mention. One is the date. We can't forget the date of the plat
for Mr. Nichols. It is dated August 12, 2002, received November 14th, There was a
revised one that was received November 14th and then just listening to the Council
discuss the potential tiling of just that east portion of the drain, I'm just thinking about the
-- a railing, certainly, is going to be appropriate there. So -- and I don't think that's a --
I'm not sure where in terms of the process that happens, but that's not included in any
requirements right now.
Bird: I think that would be mandatory.
Corrie: Great. Okay any other discussion? Okay. Hearing none, then, I will entertain a
motion, then, for the request for annexation and zoning, Number 02-023, at this time.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve AZ 02-023, the request for annexation and zoning
of 6.06 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision by CMD,
Incorporated, with only tiling the drain at the east end to accept the sidewalk. Also to
put railing -- safety railing across the tiling there where the sidewalk is completely
across the deal where the sidewalk will be used, and for the attorney to draw up the
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order and to implement
staff and applicant's comments.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded for the approval of the request for
annexation within the motion. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr.
Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. Three ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Next would be the request for Preliminary Plat, PP 02-021.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 34 of 37
Bird: I would move that we approve PP 02-021, the request for Preliminary Plat
approval of 25 building lots, one existing residence, and eight other lots on 6.06 acres in
a proposed R-8 zone for proposed Moshers Farm Subdivision by CMD, Incorporated,
895 North Ten Mile Road. To implement staff and applicant comments and to note the
plat is received December 4, 2002, I believe. What was the date on the revised plat?
Corrie: November 14, 2002.
Bird: November 14, 2002? That's on the plat itself or was that just when we received
it?
Hawkins-Clark: That's just the receipt. The date itself is August 12, 2002.
Bird: August 12, 2002 as the revised plat and for the attorney to draw up the Findings
of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order.
Nary: Second.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Motion made and second. Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I think -- does that include the 12-foot
setback on the existing house on the -- shown on the plat, Brad? Is that where that
setback modification should be shown?
Hawkins-Clark: Correct.
Bird: Isn't it shown on the revised? I thought the applicant stated that it was shown on
the -- on the revised -- the ones where he showed it. Is this the same as -- is the
revised one the same as --
Hawkins-Clark: I do not see it on the face of the plat, so it should be added as a --
Bird: Okay. I will add the 12-foot setback on the existing house, if it's okay with --
Nary: I would concur.
Corrie: Okay.
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: And I had a question on the micropath landscaping, which is Site-Specific
Comment Number 2. Do you need to amend that to allow that meandering pathway or
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 35 of 37
is that language in there adequate to include this meandering pathway to allow for the
trees?
Hawkins-Clark: My recommendation -- excuse me. My recommendation was to delete
Item Number 2 on Page 3, which conflicts with the meandering -- which it sounds like
Council wants to approve, so that would clean it up if we simply deleted that.
Bird: And that's what I meant by staff comments.
Nary: Okay so I would concur with that as well.
Corrie: Okay any further discussion? Okay roll call vote, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. Three ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Now, the final is a request for a Conditional Use Permit, CUP 02-031, Moshers
Farm Subdivision.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve CUP 02-031, a request for a Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Unit Development for 25 single-family detached homes and one
single-family existing home in an R-8 zone for the proposed Moshers Farm Subdivision
by CMD, Incorporated. To implement all staff and applicant's comments and for the
attorney to draw up Findings of facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded. Any further discussion?
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Just so it's clear on that site-specific condition regarding the ACHD
recommendations, would that also include the staff comment --
Bird: That's correct.
Nary: -- about if there is a change by ACHD?
Meridian City Council
December 10,2002
Page 36 of 37
Bird: That's right.
Nary: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay any further comments or discussion? With that being said, Mr. Berg.
Roll call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye. Roll call.
Corrie: Okay. All ayes. Motion is approved.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: That takes care of our meeting agenda for this evening. I'll remind everybody
that we do have a date, the 12th of December, at 7:00. Anything further?
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I think we talked about this a couple of times and I just don't recall if we finalized
it. Is there a meeting next Wednesday on the golf course on the 18th?
Bird: Yes.
Corrie: I don't know if the attorneys -- Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I have not had any contact with Ms. Butler
lately. I did issue a memo to you and the Council on issues that you wanted
researched, but I haven't had any contact from her beyond the letter that she sent to
you here recently.
Corrie: Do you want to schedule it? Do you want to make sure that she wants to have
it the 18th?
Nary: It doesn't matter to me. I had another potential conflict on the 18th, I just wanted
to know. It doesn't matter.
Bird: If it's a fun conflict, we will make sure that we have the meeting.
Nary: No, it's not fun. It's no play. It's nothing that -- maybe, Mr. Nichols, if it's done by
e-mail, we will just get a hold of Ms. Butler. It doesn't matter to me.
Corrie: I would like to -- I would like to -- if they want to have it the 18th on their agenda
and they would like it, I think a lot of the questions that you had would clear up a lot of
what they want to have but that's just an observation on my part.
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 37 of 37
Nichols: Well, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I will contact Ms. Butler and see if
she is still planning on a meeting on the evening of the 18th and, if so, do we still want to
meet ahead of time in Executive Session before that meeting, then, to coordinate with
the Mayor's Office with regard to the times?
Corrie: I think that would be apropos. Okay. That being said, we will let you know by
e-mail for sure on the 18th. Any other before the Council? If not, I will entertain a
motion to close the Council Meeting on the evening.
Nary: I move we adjourn.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor say
aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Corrie: Adjournment at five minutes until 9:00.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:55 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
11- 1/7 I tJ2-
DATE
ATTESTED: c!I.-~~~~~
WilLIAM G. BERG, JR., IT lERK
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST )
FOR PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLA TFOR)
GOLDSTONE CENTER )
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION, )
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF )
EAGLE ROAD, APPROXIMA TEL Y v.. )
MILE SOUTH OF OVERLAND ROAD, )
MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
)
)
)
C/C 11/26/02
Case No. P/FP-02-003
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELIl\1INARYIFINAL PLAT
BY: SUNDANCE COMPANY,
APPLICANT
The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on
November 26, 2002, and Brad Hawkins-Clark Planner II for the Planning and Zoning Department, and
Ryan Anderson, appeared and testified at the hearing, and the City Council having received a report
from David McKinnon Planner II for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton,
Engineering Technician III, and the City Council having received as part of the record of this matter
the recommendation to City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having
submitted the Plat Drawing described as follows, "PLAT OF GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONCOMINIUMS, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 5, BLOCK I , SILVERSTONE SUBDIVISION,
LYING IN THE NW 1;4, SECTION 21, T.3N., R IE., B.M., .MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
2002, shtlofdwg 07-15-02 11:16:14 jcox, Handwritten Date: 7/15/02, SHEET 1 OF 4, PROJECT
NO. 2492, TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING", submitted for preliminary/final plat approval and which
preliminary/final plat application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION (PFP-02-003)
- 1
plat application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code,
Section 12-3. Therefore the City Council makes the following findings:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by
reason of the fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive
Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive Plan and Map,
adopted December 21, 1993, and the property is presently zoned C-G General Retail and Service
Commercial District, and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System. [see Meridian
City Code, Section 11-7-2 K]
2. The preliminaty plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian
adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629.
3. It is determined that Urban Services can be made available to accommodate the
proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements and conditions hereinafter set forth as
conditions of preliminary plat approval.
4. The proposed development is a continuity of the development within the City's Capital
Improvement Program and if the conditions which are requested by the Planning and Zoning
Administrator and the Engineering Technician III are met there will be public financial capability of
supporting services for the proposed development.
5. The development, if built in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will not
create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such concerns
brought to the Council's attention.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELThAINARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINillMS SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-003)
- 2
6. It is found that the Recommendation to City Council ofthe Planning and Zoning
Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as
hereinafter set forth.
DECISION AND ORDER
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code, Section 12-
3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER
The PreliminarylFinal Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "PLAT OF GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONCOMINIUMS, ARESUBDIVISION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, SILVERSTONE SUBDIVISION,
LYING IN THE NW Y4, SECTION 21, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
2002, shtlofdwg 07-15-02 11: 16:14 jcox, Handwritten Date: 7/15/02, SHEET 1 OF 4, PROJECT
NO. 2492, TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING", has been submitted for preliminary/final plat.
1. The conditions of Staff pertaining to the PreliminarylFinal Plat comments are as set forth in the
Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from David McKinnon, Planner II for Planning and
Zoning, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, dated September 30, 2002, listing 6 Site
Specific Comments - PreliminaryIFinal Plat, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto and
marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of three (3) pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with
the additional requirements from the City Council from their meeting of November 26,2002, and the
requirements are as follows, to-wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELMNARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDO:MINTIJMS SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-003)
- 3
A. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staffas follows:
1. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
2. Applicant shall comply with all the requirements ofIdaho Code Title 55, Chapter 15
"Condominium Property Act."
3. Correct the spelling of "Resubdivision" in the plat situate statement on pages 1-3.
4. Correct the development name reference in note number 9.
5. Reword note 10 as follows:
A(gacent to all right-of-way lines are is hereby designated as having a ten (10)... surfaced
driveways fom the public...
6. Correct the domestic water service origin statement in the Certificate of Owners to indicate
service from the City of Meridian.
B. Adopt the Recommendations of the ACHD as follows:
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Construct the proposed shared driveway on Goldstone Drive (Silverstone Way) approximately
323 feet east of the west property line abutting Eagle Road.
2. Pave the shared driveway to its full required width (maximum of35 feet) and to a point 30 feet
beyond the edge of pavement of Goldstone Drive (Silverstone Way) with 15 foot curb radii
tapers.
3. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel
access to Eagle Road or Goldstone Drive (Silverstone Way) is prohibited. Lot access
restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat.
4. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be
borne by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during
the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280
(with file number) for details.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELllv1INARYIFINALPLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION (PFP-02-003)
- 4
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five year old are not allowed unless approved in writing
by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer
registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The Applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use, and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees is required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee
Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
Existing utilities damaged by the Applicant shall be repaired by the Applicant at no cost to
ACHD. The Applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full
business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The Applicant shall contact
ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the Applicant of the Applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the Applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
1 L Any change by the Applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the Applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans,
or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the Applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless a waiver! variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-003)
- 5
C. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows:
1. A fire flow as required by the Uniform Fire Code shall be available for duration of2 hours to
service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be place an average of 400' apart.
2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins.
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department.
4. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius.
5. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation per
section 1103.2.4 of the Uniform Fire Code.
6. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards with a minimum clear driving
width of20' available at all times.
7. The proposed buildings and uses shall comply with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code.
8. All occupancies will have to meet the separation requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
D. Adopt the Recommendations of Central District Health Dept as follows:
1. The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and approved by
the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality.
2. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
E. Adopt the Recommendations of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District as follows:
1. If any storm drainage leaves the site the District will require that a Land Use Change/Site
application be filed.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk
and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at
such time as:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELlMlNARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-003)
- 6
a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer;
b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the
appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-
site and required on-site improvements; and
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /D~day of
A -- L e f2v{:;-v-u
k)f: , 2002.
BY:~J
ROBERT D. CORRIE -
Mayor, City of Meridian
ByJI~ft~/ 9-
City Clerk v
Copy seIVed upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City
Attorney. \\\1\\111111/1/',
",\:~ Of MEf::[,/"'II,
__", :'\' ViA "'/'l
~,c} ot\P~ -71- ~
!2-~/O- 02--- f ~G % %
Dated: ~ -;: ~
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Goldstone Center Condo's PFP02-003IPrcLimPlatFinalPlalFtCls,doc
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELllv1INARYIFINAL PLAT - GOLDSTONE CENTER
CONDOMINIUMS SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-003)
- 7
'='
),IA,YOR
Robert D, Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
LEG.-\L DEP.-\Rn[E~'T
(208) 288.2.\99 . Fa.... 288-2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
Kdth Bird
Cherie ~kC.mdlegg
William L.:-"L Nary
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' F.\.\: (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax-(208) 888-42 [8
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEP.-\RTMEN'T
(208) 898.5500' Fax 887-[297
PL.-\.l',NlNG A'<1) ZONING
DEPARnlENT
(208) 884-5533 . FAX 888.6854
MEl\'IORANDUM:
September 30, 2002
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
David McKinnon., Planner II ~A ~
Bruce Freckleton., Senior EngJderi~g Tech ~
RECEIVED
OCT 1 1 2002
From:
Re:
Goldstone Center Condominiums Subdivision
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
· Preliminary/Final Plat Approval of a One (1) Lot Condominium Subdivision
on 3.8491 Acres in a C-C Zone, by the Sundance Corporation (File No. PFP-
02-003).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approvaL These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICA nON SUMl\1ARY
The Applicant, the Sundance Corporation, has applied for PreliminarylFinal Plat approval of a
one (1) lot commercial condominium subdivision on 3.8491 acres ofland on Lot 5, Block I of
the Silverstone Subdivision, located on the east side of Eagle Road, south of Overland Road.
Approval of the condominium subdivision process will allow the owner of the building to sell
space within the walls of the building to different individuals. No external changes will be made
to the existing Goldstone Building. The landscaping and other required improvements have
already been installed and approved of by the City.
LOCATION
The property is located on the east side of Eagle Road, approximately ~ of a mile south of
Overland Road.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Silverstone Business Park, zoned C-C.
South: Silverstone Business Park, zoned C-C.
West: Commercial zoned property (the proposed El' Dorado Business Park) zoned C-C and
C-G.
East: Vacant land, zoned R-I and RUT (Ada County).
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
PFP-02..oo;J
ht~
II I
!
Goldstorut SubdivisiOlL .PFP
Planning & Zoning Commis .1IMayor & City Council
September 30,2002
Page 2
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Stafffinds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Councilor Commission's
attention.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS - PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT
1. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
2. Applicant shall comply with all the requirements of Idaho Code Title 55, Chapter 15
"Condominium Property Act."
.
3. Correct the spelling of"Resubdivision" in the plat situate statement on pages 1-3.
4. Correct the development name reference in note number 9.
5. Reword note 1 0 as follows:
Atijacent to all right-of-way lines are is hereby designated as hay,ing a ten (10)...
. .. surfaced driveways fomthe public. . .
PFP-4l.{103 Gold.tDne Sulxlivioion .PFP
.,
J
Planrflng & Zoning Commis~.....oIMayor & City Council
September 30,2002
Page 3
6. Correct the domestic water service origin statement in the Certificate of Owners to
indicate service from the City of Meridian.
RECOMl\'fENDA TION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary/final plat, with the aforementioned
findings and conditions.
PFP-QHI03
~:4 " AU
5
G<J[dslo,," SIllxlivision .PFP
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUESTFORPREL~INARY&INAL
PLAT FOR NORCO SUBDMSION,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
FAIRVIEW A VENUE, APPROXIMA TEL Y
% MILE WEST OF EAGLE ROAD,
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
BY: PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.,
APPLICANT.
C/C 11/26/02
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. P&P 02-004
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW AND ORDER
OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARY/
FINAL PLAT
The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council
on November 26, 2002, and Brad Hawkins-Clark Planner II for the Planning and Zoning
Department, Brad Watson of Public Works, and Clint Boyle, appeared and testified at the hearing,
and the City Council having received a report from David McKinnon Planner n for the Planning
and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and the City Council
having received as part of the record of this matter the recommendation to City Council of the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having submitted the Plat Drawing described
as follows, "PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NORCO SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF THE SE
1,4 OF THE SW 1,4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE
MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2002, NORCO SUBDIVISION,
PRELIMINARY PLAT, JIM A KISSLER, LLC, DATE: 08-09-02 AND A HANDWRITTEN
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELllvfINAR Y /FINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 1
DATE: 14 AUG 02, DRAWN BY: DJL, DESIGNED BY: CEB, CHECKED BY: lG.
CARPENTERP.E., PROJECT NO. C016321, SHEET PP-1, P:\A_CIVIL\C016321yS.dwg.
08/14/2002 02:41:41 PM, XES 8830 vellum.pc3, Pinnacle Engineers, Inc.,
OWNER/DEVELOPER: JIM A. KISSLER, LLC, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", and
"FINAL PLAT FOR NORCO SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF THE SE Y4 OF THE SWl/4 OF
SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2002, File name:
P:\A_CIVIL\COI6321\dwg\C016321_FP.dwg, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 14 AUG 02,
SHEET 1 OF 2, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", Jim A. Kissler submitted for preliminary/final
plat approval and which preliminary/final plat application is herein received and adjudged by the
City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code, Section 12-3. Therefore the City Council makes
the following findings:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by
reason of the fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive
Plan and Map, adopted December 21, 1993, and the property is presently zoned C-G General
Retail and Service Commercial District, and requires connection to the Municipal Water and
Sewer System. [see Meridian City Code, Section 11-7-2 K]
2. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of
Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT - NOReO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 2
3, It is determined that Urban Services can be made available to accommodate the
proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements and conditions hereinafter set
forth as conditions of preliminary plat approvaL
4, The proposed development is a continuity of the development within the City's
Capital Improvement Program and if the conditions which are requested by the Planning and
Zoning Administrator and the Engineering Technician III are met there will be public financial
capability of supporting services for the proposed development.
5. The development, ifbuilt in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will
not create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such
concerns brought to the Council's attention.
6. It is found that the Recommendation to City Council of the Planning and Zoning
Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as
hereinafter set forth.
DECISION AND ORDER
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code,
Section 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein
adopted:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND TillS DOES ORDER
The Preliminary/Final Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "PRELIl\1INARY PLAT FOR
NORCO SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF THE SE ~ OF THE SW ~ OF SECTION 5,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE "MERIDIAN, CITY OF "MERIDIAN, ADA
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROV AI.. OF
PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 3
COUNTY, IDAHO 2002, NORCO SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAT, JIM A KISSLER,
LLC, DATE: 08-09-02 AND A HANDWRITTEN DATE: 14 AUG 02, DRAWN BY: DJL,
DESIGNED BY: CEB, CHECKED BY: IG. CARPENTERP.E., PROJECT NO. C016321,
SHEET PP-l, P:\A_CIVIL\COI6321_BS.dwg. 08/14/2002 02:41:41 PM, XES 8830
vellum.pc3, Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., OWNER/DEVELOPER: JIM A. KISSLER, LLC,
PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", and "FINAL PLAT FOR NORCO SUBDIVISION, A
PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1
EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2002, File name:
P:\A_CIVIL\COI6321\dwg\COI6321_FP.dwg, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 14 AUG 02,
SHEET 1 OF 2, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", has been submitted for preliminary/final plat.
1. The conditions of Staff pertaining to the PreliminaryIFinal Plat comments are as set forth
in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from David McKinnon, Planner II for
Planning and Zoning, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, dated September 30,
2002, listing 3 Site Specific Comments - PreliminarylFinal Plat, a true and correct copy of which
is attached hereto and marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of three (3) pages, and by this reference
incorporated herein, with the additional requirements from the City Council from their meeting of
November 26,2002, and the requirements are as follows, to-wit:
A. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as
follows:
1. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
2. Record the proposed cross access and ingress/egress easement with the declaration of
Covenants, Conditions, and Requirements prior to the City's signature on the Final Plat.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELlMINARYIFINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 4
3. All existing easements lying within the boundaries of this subdivision shall be noted on the
Final Plat.
B. Adopt the Recommendations of the ACHD as follows:
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Provide the District with a copy of a recorded cross access easement for all three of the
proposed lots within this development to access the public street via the two existing
driveways on Fairview Avenue, as proposed.
2. Utilize an existing 40 foot wide driveway on Fairview Avenue located 190 feet east of the
west property line.
3. Utilize an existing 30 to 35 foot wide driveway on Fairview Avenue located adjacent to
the east property line.
4. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel
access to Fairview Avenue is prohibited.
5. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five year old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for
details.
5. AIl design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An
engineer registered in the State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELllvllNAR Y /FINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP -02-004)
- 5
6. The Applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building
pennit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use, and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for
occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees is required prior to building construction in
accordance with Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road
Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to verifY all existing utilities within the right-of-
way. Existing utilities damaged by the Applicant shall be repaired by the Applicant at no
cost to ACHD. The Applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at
least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The
Applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD
conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the Applicant of the Applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon
the Applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway
District.
11. Any change by the Applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the Applicant to comply with aU rules, regulations, ordinances,
plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the Applicant or its
successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use
of the subject property unless a waiverl variance of said requirements or other legal relief
is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
C. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows:
1. Provide a fire flow as required by the 1997 Uniform Fire code Appendix III-A Please
show all proximity hydrants within 500' of the project on the resubmitted plat.
2. All entrances and internal roads shall have comers with a minimum of a 28' inside radius
and 48' outside radius.
3. The proposed buildings and uses shall comply with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code.
4. All occupancies will have to meet the separation requirements of the Uniform Building
Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF
PRELllv1INARYIFINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 6
D. Adopt the Recommendations of Central District Health Dept as follows:
1. The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and
approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental
Quality.
2. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
3. Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface
to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality.
4. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain
current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater
management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City
Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed
only at such time as:
a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer~
b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or
the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion
of off-site and required on-site improvements~ and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELIMINAR Y /FINAL PLAT - NORCO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 7
'Ih
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the If} --day of
Ate {J?v!r&tJ , 2002,
By: ~~:,
ROBERT D. CORRIE ~
Mayor, City of Meridian
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department
and City Attorney.
By~--.:-k6-,.:l" Sl
City Clerk 1/ .
Dated: /.2--10.-02-
z:\ WorklM\McridianlMcridian 15360M\Goldstonc Ccntcr Condo's PFP02-003\PreLimPlatFinaIPlatFlt:ls.doc
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF
PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT - NOReO SUBDIVISION (pFP-02-004)
- 8
::>
MAYOR
Rob~rt D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE V ALLEY
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-250 l
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deW~erd
Keith Bird
Cherie McCandless
William L.M. Nary
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
lVIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 . FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM:
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
David McKilU1on, Planner II ~JA ~
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Englne'e~i~g Tech ~
September 30, 2002
RECEI-\7ED
OCT 1 0 2002
From:
Re:
Noreo Subdivision
City Of Meridian
_City Clerk Office
· PreliminaryIFinal Plat Approval of a Three (3) Lot Subdivision on 5.5 Acres
in a C-G Zone, by Pinnacle Engineers, Ine (File No. PFP-02-004).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUM:MARY
The Applicant, Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., has applied for Preliminary/Final Plat approval of a
three (3) lot commercial (C-G) subdivision on 5.5 acres of land located on the north side of
Fairview Avenue, approximately 3A of anile west of Eagle Road.
The site presently consists of a 21,200 square foot retail/warehouse (Noreo) located on Lot 2,
Block 1, and a 24,500 square foot retail/office/restaurant strip mall locate on Lot 3, Block 1 of
the proposed subdivision. The recently approved Sonic Drive-in restaurant will be constructed
on Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed subdivision.
Landscaping, irrigation, sanitary sewer & water services, and other required subdivision
improvements have already been installed or constructed on site.
Minimum parking requirements for each building will be met by the parking provided on each
individual lot.
LOCATION
The property is located on the north side ofFairview Avenue, approximately % of a mile west of
Eagle Road.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Dove Meadows Subdivision, zoned R-8.
PFP-ll2-004
:~;+
.' lot!
Nom> Subdivision "PFP
Planning & Zoning Comri ,ion/Mayor & City Cduncil
September 30, 2002
Page 2
South: Rural residential, zoned R-l (Ada County).
West: Commercial property (Chevron, Fred Meyers, strip malls) zoned C-G.
East: Vacant land, zoned R-l and RUT (Ada County).
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's
attention.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS - PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT
1. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
2. Record the proposed cross access and ingress egress easement with the declaration of
Covenants, Conditions and Requirements prior to the City's Signature on the Final Plat.
3. ~y depic(ffll existing easements lying within the boundaries ofthis sUbdivision.a4a.i.e.- b&
~ 6tv Ul1l .':::f(/J{.~ P J!Li::6.
PFP..{)2-004
:bif "
..
Norco Subdivision .PFP
Planning & Zoning Conu:i~ JiowMayor & City Council
September 30, 2002
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary/final plat, with the aforementioned
findings and conditions.
PFP-02-004
i bet-It&'
s
Norco Subdivision .PF?
December 6,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
December 10, 2002
ITEM NO.
3'-E
REQUEST Off-Site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons (Quenzer Commonsj--
Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLlCE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See Attached Memo / Easement
~
a~
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
. , ... ~ ," ? '
~ eity of M~r"iai~Ij;.,: ,.c'" '
:" Publi.c; VVQi1(~J~!Rt~ C :, .
~. ~ . .; ~~~~"::~J;,"~",-;",?",-\>'",~"'''~';S:~i.i:;~Ig:."Z.,~~~~?,,-;::."( ..,",~
Mem
RECEIVED
NOV 2 7 2002
To: Mayor & Council
from:Gary D. Smith, PE
CC: file
Date: November 27, 2002
Re: Water and Sewer line Easements
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
I respectfully request you
and water line easements
~ 1. Quenzer
provides for exten':':'"
area of this project
2. Krispy Kreme
access to City
development.
3. R T. Nahas
easement providin!
building project.
Re;t;;dS.
Gary DkE
. Page 1
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this 25th day of November, 2002 between EUGENE AND ARDYCE
QUENZER, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way
across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground
pipelines to be constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary
sewer and water mains over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary
sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and
replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities
at any and all times.
TO HA VB AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Page I
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR: j
g~~V!2~ ~~~
Eu e Quenzer
~~ d c~hJ
rd e Quenzer
STATE OF IDAHO)
) ss
County of Ada )
On this 25th day of November, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared EUGENE AND ARDYCE QUENZER , known or identified to
me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to
me that they executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
in this ce~.. . at6l~1a-above written.
~CCA A. ~~ ~<t~
.tJ' ~1(jGD.~Deo..::~~'\,
I' :t."D 0e 'f-: ~
:i ! .:10T Ait ~\ (fl -;
:: ~"" r 0 ..
: * : ~0c::. : :
~ t :*:
~ \ PlJ B t.. \ C D. ::
':. (/l: · ~
~ 'j., De .. 0 ~
.... .r'.. .. ~'\c' ..
.""~ -<11' ....... ",. <!''''
'ft; l! OF rp ~ ..,.....
/If.... .."
.......tuua~\"
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Page 3
Engineering North West, LLC
423 N. Ancestor Place, Suite 140
Boise, Idaho 83704
(208) 376-5000 . Fax (208) 376-5556
Project No. 01-045-02
Date: November 20, 2002
QUENZER COMMONS COMMERCIAL
30 FOOT WIDE
UTILITY EASEMENT
A 30 foot wide utility easement located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 31, T. 4N.,
R. 1 E., RM., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the 1/4 section comer common to Sections 31 and 32 of said
T. 4N., R. IE.;
Thence North 89046 '21" West, 206.19 feet on the east-west mid-section line of said
Section 31 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ofthe centerline of a 30.00 foot wide utility
easement, lying 15.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline;
Thence South 00030' 18" West, 585.12 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line
of E. Heritage Park Street, said point being the POINT OF TERMINUS of this 30.00 foot wide
easement.
PREP ARED BY:
Engineering NorthWest, LLC
James R. Washburn, PLS
Quenzer Commons Commercial Utility EaSemenLdoc
Page 1 of I
(
QUENZER COltlMONS SUBDI\tISION NO. I
OFF-SITE UTILITIES EASEMENT
.. EXHIBIT B ..
SCALE: 1" - 1 oot
REAL POINT OF BEGINNING
LEIGH FIELD OR.
3D' WIDE PUBUC
UTlUTlES EASEMENT
. . . S89'46'21"E 206.19'. . .
-----..
--,-
~rn<K~-:~ __~~
~----I------
f-----j
I I
I I
-~..........",..---
I I I
I FUTURE PHASE I
----~ I-----~
I I 1-------
I I I
-----j r----J
I I I
I I I
----i :-_~~--: I~~
G1-------~
I
I
----.-J
f
f
-------~-I
fil=
--------- Ig
I~
;Ii
~
- -
a
e G
e
8~
~
---------,
f
lOYALTY ST.
@~
il=
...
~
~
~
li
~
e
8
. . . 589'29' 42"E. .
. 148.24' .
- -
POiNT OF TERMINUS
E. HERITAGE PAAK ST.
(
e
G
@
E GRaN ST,
r.--,
1/4
...
Ul
;:I;
:!;
<(
"l
o
o
v
N
o
o
N
........
OJ
.:::::.
~
'0
~
Z
W
:::;
W
Ul
<C
~
-'
<(
<J
a=
w
;:I;
5
(JI
W
t.:I
~
ffi
;J;;
..
c:
'i
<:I
L,
Q
./
o
o
<()
v
o
5
I
I
Ul
z
o
:!;
:!;
o
<1
w
Cl
<C
I-
iE
w
?
-';
December 6,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST
December 10, 2002
ITEM NO.
Sewer and Water Line Easement, Krispy Kreme -- Gemtone, Inc.:
3-P
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See Attached Memo I Easement
p
curr
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of fhe City of Meridian.
Me
RECEIVED
NOY 2 7 2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
To: Mayor & Council
From: Gary D. Smith, PE
CC: file
Date: November 27,2002
Re: Water and Sewer Line Easements
I respectfully request your review and approval of the following named and attached sewer
and water line easements:
1. Quenzer Com.,-rons Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement. This easement
provides for extension of the sewer and water lines through the future commercial
area of this project.
,'if- 2. Krispy Kreme Water and Sewer Line Easement. This easement provides City
access to City water and sewer main lines and fire hydrants serving this commercial
development.
3. R T. Nahas Building Project Water Line Easement This is a two-part water line
easement providing City access to City water main line and fire hydrants serving this
building project.
R79S'
Gary DkE
From the desk of...
Gary D. Smith, PE
Public Wotks Director
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suile 200
Meridian,. Idaho 83642
CD Page 1
(200) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of ,20_between Gemtone, Inc. , the
parties oftl1e first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises
and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be
constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer
line over and across the following described property:
(SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary
sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement
at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all
times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
C:\projects\2002\08\20823 - Krispy Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT.SWR.doc
Page 1
EASMT.SWR
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written,
GRANTOR:
E OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this l~V-\ day of ~(~ 1\ , 20 before me, the undersigned, a Notary
.
Public in and for said State, personally appeared j ~ and
, known or identified to me to be the President and
Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and
acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN WIT~ ~H~OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and y .~t~. \ D
~(/~o:.^: ;'..,: :\ -=-",L\J\JJ\A~\ ~\;\OJ\J-/
* \c!: NOTARY POOL FOR IDAHO
'\ \ PUB\.. .a~ a i
"tL cP, .. .. A: ~ ID
-~ l'> .......... 0y.... Res'd' ~,.- t
~ -1,. \:\> v~~.... 1 mg _-1 ,[2 l"i:- a
~~~~ 'E 0 F.,.' \ - -.)V)
C:\projects\2002\08\2~OfU!~py Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT .SWR.doc
Page 2 EASMT.SWR
(
Commission Expires:
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Come, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
C:\projects\2002\08\20823 - Krispy Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT.SWR.doc
Page 3
EASMT.SWR
t
r
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF
CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
PROPOSED TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER NO.3 SUBDIVISION
October 16, 2002
An easement for sanitary sewer facilities in Lots 1, 2, 9 and 10, Block 1, Treasure Valley
Business Center Phase 1, located in the NE % of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1
East of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of Section 8, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., thence
N 89048'53" W 507.73 feet along the north line of said Section 8 to a point;
Thence S 00000'00" W 131.34 feet to the BEGINNING POINT of this easement
centerline description, said easement being 20 feet in width and centered on the
following described line;
Thence S 00024'45" W 250.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 52054'20" E 41.75 feet to a point;
Thence S 00024'44" W 151.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 14039'42" W 70.66 feet to a point on the south boundary of Lot 10, Block 1,
Treasure Valley Business Center Ph.1, the END POINT of this easement centerline.
Michael E. Marks, P.L.S.
20823ssease
, .
I
I
S 00'00'00" W.--:
131.34' J
EXHIBIT "B"
N 89'48'53" W
..
507.73'
~
8/9
FAIRVIEW AVENUE
BEGINNING POINT
2
I
~I
I
I I
1
S 00'24'45" W
50.00'
~
N
i.n
"'1
0 O'l
<( V
(Cl
0 C"'>l
0:::
L.....J
-.J 5:
<:>
<( i.n
L.....J V
co
z p
~
0
(/)
TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER PH.1
EXISTING LOT LINES
BLOCK 1
PROPOSED LOT LINES
9
v "
vO
~ 0
v .
C"-I ~
, L.(")
rl
l?
10
I
I
~
JEWELL STREET
S 14'39'42" W
70.66'
END POINT
L.....J
>
<(
Bt9
L.....J
>
::J
o
BRIGGS ENGINEERING. INC. CITY
(~)
(20B).344-9700
1 600 w. OVERLAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO B.3705
DESIGN
OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
PROPOSED TREASURE VALLEY
BUSINESS CENTER NO. 3
LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 8,
T.3N., R.1 E., 8.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG.NO.
MEM NTS 10/16/02 20823
REVISION
SHEET
1 OF 1
EXHIBIT
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of ,20_between Gemtone, Inc. , the
parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises
and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be
constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said
pipeline from time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation, maintenance, repair,
replacement of a water main over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHffilT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose 0 f construction and operation 0 f a water line
and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto,
repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such
facilities at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that after making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent cOlU1ection to
the water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that
existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be
responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in
this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
C:\projects\2002\08\20823 - Krispy Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT. WTR.doc
Page 1
EASMT.WTR
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract ofland, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
President
OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this '23~(\ day of ~xdJJ2\ , 20
Public in and for said State, personally appeared , and
, known or identified to me to be the President and
Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and
acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
b~fore me,. the undersi~ed, a Notary
IN WITN~Sij'W~F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and yei~~)~~~fi.\ ~. ~
/;, *o~^:y \.~ \ : ~\JA_,\;~\ ~\\ClJlL
If,. ....G j E OIARY PUB FOR IDAHO
~.\ poy>"Y ..~i
~ ... ... '" .; ~ "-If .,"-
";o""~ 0';......... \9 ~...... Residing 'v....F~t _ at
~""...;1. 1'E 0.;."," Commission Expires: ---, ,--J-:::> i '1 ~
........ \ t--...:).\...7 J
C:\projects\2002\08\20823 - Krispy Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT. WTR.doc
Page 2
EASMT.WTR
I
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
C:\projects\2002\08\20823 - Krispy Kremes\Correspondence\Out-going\EASMT.WTR.doc
Page 3
EASMT. WTR
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF
CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER LINE EASEMENTS
PROPOSED TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER NO.3 SUBDIVISION
November 7, 2002
Two easements for water line facilities in Lots 1, 2, 9 and 10, Slack 1, Treasure Valley
Business Center Phase 1, located in the NE Y.t of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1
East of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly
described as follows:
EASEMENT "A"
Commencing at the northeast corner of Section 8, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., S.M., thence
N 89048'53" W 496.34 feet along the north line of said Section 8 to a point;
Thence S 00000'00" W 78.01 feet to a point on the southerly right of way of Fairview
Avenue, the BEGINNING POINT of this easement centerline description:
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 35.00 feet to a point;
Easement 37' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00<>24'45" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 78.60 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 16' left:
Thence S 00"24'45" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 75.60 feet to a point;
Easement 29' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 22.00 feet to a point;
20823watease
Easement 10' right and 18' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 55.00 feet to a point;
Easement 29' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'45" W 6.64 feet to a point
Thence S 52054'20" E 27.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 27' left:
Thence S 52054'20" E 10.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 52054'20" E 4.75 feet to a point;
Thence S 00024'44" W 79.20 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 18' left:
Thence S 00024'44" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'44" W 23.00 feet to a point;
Easement 29' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'44" W 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence S 00024'44" W 81.43 feet to a point;
Thence S 44013'15" E 66.15 feet to a point;
Thence S 45046'45" W 24.59 feet to a point on the south boundary of Lot 10, Block 1,
Treasure Valley Business Center Ph.1, the END POINT of this easement centerline.
EASEMENT "8"
20823watease
Commencing at the northeast corner of Section 8, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., thence
N 89048'53" W 496.34 feet along the north line of said Section 8 to a point;
Thence S 00000'00" W 78.01 feet to a point on the southerly right of way of Fairview
Avenue, said point being the Beginning Point of Easement "A";
Thence S 00024'45" W 297.84 feet along the centerline of Easement "A" to a point;
Thence S 52054'20" E 36.99 feet along the centerline of Easement "A" to the
BEGINNING POINT of this easement centerline description;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence N 37005'40" E 2.00 feet to a point;
Thence N 89020'12" E 172.30 feet to a point;
Easement 29' right and 10' left:
Thence N 89020'12" E 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence N 89020'12" E 87.50 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 18' left:
Thence N 89020'12" E 5.00 feet to a point;
Easement 10' right and 10' left:
Thence N 89020'12" E 9.20 feet to the END POINT of this easement centerline
Michael E. Marks, P.L.S.
20823watease
(
EXHIBIT "B"
(
496.34'
~
8/9
'1 .
I N 89'48'53" W
I
:_5 OO'pO'OO" W FAIRVIEW AVENUE
I 78.01
I
I BEGINNING POINT "A"
~
~~
L5 00'24'45" W
297.84'
-tJ
z
:J
27'
in
2
1
13
-I
19'
in
Cl
W
Ul
o
c...
o
a::
c...
9
---
N 37'05'40" E
I 2.00'
I {:'
. J in 5 00'24'44" W
tI"ll 193.63'
I I
10 10
~
END POINT "B"
If)
~
Cl O"l
<t v
to
0 N
a::::
lLJ
---l 3=
~
<t 'in
lLJ V
co
Z 0
0
if)
5 52'54'20" E
41.75'
TREASURE VALLEY BUSlrESS CENTER PH,'
EXISTING LOT LINES
BEGINNING POINT "8"
IV
Ul
~10
:J
I
J
b
-I
JEWELL STREET
Cl
W
(I)
o
c...
o
a::
c...
S 45'46'45" W
24.59'
L.I.J
>
<t
lLJ
>
::J
o
8~~L
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
<~)
(20B)344-97oo
1 800 W. OVERlAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO 83705
CITY OF' MERIDIAN WATER LINE EASEMENTS
PROPOSED TREASURE VALLEY
BUSINESS CENTER NO.3
LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 8,
T.3N., R.tE., 8.M.. MERIDIAN. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG.NO.
MEM NTS 11/05/02 20823
REVISION
SHEET
1 OF 1
EXHIBIT
December 6,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas:
Decem ber 10, 2002
ITEM NO.
r~-~
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETILERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See Attached Memo / Easement
f.t/
~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
RD l~ "i"'"71 'f"lf\ .,
"~ ' D l.; JiLL V
NOV 27 2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
To: Mayor & Council
From::Gary D. Smith, PE
CC: file
Date:: November 27} 2002
Re: Water and Sewer Une Easements
I respectfully request your review and approval of the following named and attached sewer
and water line easements:
1. Quenzer Commons Off-site Sewer and Water Une Easement. This easement
provides for extension of the sewer and water lines through the future commercial
area of this project.
2. Krispy Kreme Water and Sewer Une Easement. This easement provides City
access to City water and sewer main lines and fire hydrants serving this commercial
development.
'it - 3. R. T. Nahas Building Project Water Une Easement. This is a two-part water line
easement providing City access to City water main line and fire hydrants serving this
building project.
Re;!JdS'
Gary OkE
From the desk of...
Gary D. Smilli, PE
Public Works Director
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lan<l,Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 836<l2
.. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of~, 20_between R.T. Nahas Company of Idaho, an Idaho
Corporation, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and
property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed
by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from
time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good
and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-
of-way for an easement for the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement of a water main over and
across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their
allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and replacement
at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all ti meso
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD. the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors
and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after
making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line,
Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to
undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing.
replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there
in violation of this easement
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any
permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this
easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-
way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public
street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such
boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further
effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfu lIy seized and possessed of
Water Main Easement Page I
the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey
said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures
the day and year first herein above written.
. nt ~1iJ&Gr w.,J.4-JM. s
Secretary
STATE OF IDAHO)
) ss
County of Ada );
On this 51 day of (f)~ ,20 O.:z., before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State, personally appeared ,?O p e.. r -t tJJ. !1/ tfU /t..,a ..c and
, known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the
corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation
executed the same.
&J ~ ~cvJ
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at '-1n ~I"/ 'ct- /tI ) z::eI
Commission Expires: r5L/,;) '"3/0 g--
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
Water Main Easemenl
Page 2
Rqylance & Associate? P .A.
391 W. State Street, Su~e E, Eagle, Idaho &016
Engineers · Surveyors . Landplanners
Telephone (208) 939-2824 Fax (208) 939-2855
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Exhibit A
October 31, 2002
Project No. 2304
Legal Description of Waterline Easement
R. T. Nahas Company of Idaho
400 Square Foot Easement
An underground water line easement across a portion of Parcel A for the benefit of Parcel B.
Said parcels being as shown on Property Line Adjustment Survey No. 5947, Records of Ada County,
Idaho. Said easement being located in the Southwest l,4 of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range I
East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a found Y2 inch iron rod monumenting the most northerly corner of said Parcel A,
thence South 380-55'-52" East along said northerly line of Parcel A, a distance of 143.31 feet
to a found 1/2 inch iron rod, thence South 670-15'-15" East a distance of 190.56 feet to a
point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING:
The said easement being 10 feet both sides of the following described line:
Thence South 280-38'-43" West a distance of 19.99 feet to a point;
The above described easement contains 400 square feet, more or less, subject to all existing
easements and rights-of-way.
Prepared By:
ROYLANCE & ASSOCIATES P.A.
391 W. STATE STREET, SUITE E
EAGLE, IDAHO 83616
(208) 939-2824 (208) 939-2855 (FAX)
X :\PROJECTS\Nana5\22 7 8\Admin\LcgaJs\w:tlcrlinc 400.doc
-0
9
~~
9~
Z
~
~
~m
z~
mij)
ttl':\
\m
~
~
---
----- -~-
-- --.--
~"'A"'( _ ___ - ----=.-"_-------
_ _ .--rFf'( 'Y" ___ _ ___ _
......pug~..:...:.-- - - --- - - -
s. "::---- _---- __
~ - ----"-- - -- -
--~_---4- ___
---~--;-----
/
\
)>
J
J
/
J
J
/
VI
o
<A
)>"~ o"?l-
r: ....:!'-'
i"1i ,...,e-
z
CO-o
~g
L: _Z
rn z z--\
I in~ ~o
I {"1"\f'1 Z-n
/ ~~ Q
'Zz
-IrrI
.."
~
-I
(1l
o
~
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of _, 20_between R.T. Nahas Company of Idaho. an Idaho
Corporation, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and
property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed
by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from
time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ohhe benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good
and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-
of-way for an easement for the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement of a water main over and
across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their
allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and replacement
at the con venience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times.
TO HA VE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors
and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after
making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line,
Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to
undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing,
replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there
in violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any
permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this
easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-
way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public
street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such
boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become nul I and void and of no further
effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of
Water Main Easement Page I
the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey
said easement, and that they wiU warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures
the day and year first herein above written.
0~
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this 51 ~ day of Oc- +O\:.c,.....- ,20 0'2;- before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State, personally appeared 12.obv...--t W" j..,)b....J.,'1o..5> --fl:flfI-
, known or identified to me to be the President and ~\:1cretaFJ', respectively, of the
corporation that executed the within instrument. and acknowledged to me that such corporation
executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, [have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
fisl above \Vb.ll!llJA~9IfJOfJl1
f;,'>fI> DE "lJo
~<I;:'t'\ NS 11..~
($ c:>, 0 00000"0"0 1it--6" "6~
'r 000 l' ~
... ""
~OTA.J?~ \ i
" ..
\"" * <=>0= g "* :
G " ..
"PUBL\ l :
.^ "", "..
v',. .. . ,'C ..) ~
or' 00 ~" ..
"'11' 0008,,0 . ('>..4'
l'qb~ li 0 F \. V ~~'t>'"
QCqQDOOfJOBGBOll\'l~
J OTARY PU~ FOR IDAHO
()...A.... LJ ~~
Re ing at e.~1L1 ld..cJw
C mission Expires: . W. I'Ll
'UJOb
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Robert D. Con-ie, Mayor
AlleSl by William G_ Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
Water M,UIl Easemel1t
I'ag,c ?
Roylance & Associate~p.A.
391 W. Slate Street, Suite E, Eagle, Idaho 83016
EnginE?ers · Surveyors. Landplanners
(
Telephone (208) 939-2824 Fax (208) 939-2855
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Exhibit A
October 31, 2002
Project No. 2304
Legal Description of Waterline Easement
R. T. Nahas Company of Idaho
9,189 Square Foot Easement
An underground water line easement across a portion of Parcel A for the benefit of Parcel B.
Said parcels being as shown on Property Line Adjustment Survey No. 5947, Records of Ada County,
Idaho. Said easement being located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 1
East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows;
Commencing at a found 'h inch iron rod monumenting the most northerly comer of said Parcel A,
thence 20.94 feet along the easterly right-of-way of South Industry Way and the arc of a
circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 150.00 feet, a central angle of 070-59'-
55", and a chord which bears South 040-06' -11" West a distance of 20.92 feet to a found 5/8
inch iron rod; Thence South 000-06'-14" West along said easterly right-of-way a distance of
40.87 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod; thence South 000-06' -14" West along said easterly
right-of-way a distance of 187.36 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron rod; thence 111.62 feet along
said easterly right-of-way and the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius
of 210.00 feet, a central angle of 300-27' -11", a chord which bears South 150-17' -53" West a
distance of 110.31 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING:
The said easement being 10 feet both sides of the following described line:
Thence South 540-57'-27" East a distance of 169.15 feet to a point;
Thence South 890-27'-57" East a distance of 171.79 feet to a point;
The said easement being 6 feet northerly and 14 feet southerly of the following described line
Thence South 890-27' -57" East a distance of 60.00 feet to a point
The said easement being 10 feet both side of the following described line:
Thence South 890-27' -57" East a distance of 58.45 feet to point and the terminus of said
easement.
Prepared By:
ROYLANCE & ASSOCIATES P.A.
391 W. STATE STREET, SUITE E
EAGLE, IDAHO 83616
(208) 939-2824 (208) 939-2855 (FAX)
X:\PROJ ECTS\Nahas\2 278\Admi n\Lcga Is\watcrli nc cascmcn l.doc
I
,
,
I
,
I
~ I
,
Jlm ,
ex I
Z:r
m-
mm
>=1
mm
~
m
~
~
:D
'" 0
;jl~ -<
g:E r
Cb(J)I"T])>
r""wt.M-~Z
~ ~'9'0
())Cb::J
'-"(J)~m
1Or+.,
",iil (JJ)>
IOCb
Jr+g'z
N(J).,
~~.~O
.f>.;;a
'1m;;:;)>
am,CO
xaaco
..-..<Q.::JO
NCbo..
o "0
()) 0: 00
'-"a
10:1'5)>
"'o(!>
IO())Ul~
I",
/'VOl
~a; CO
(J1
~
~~il
\
"'" aJ-u
'" 8Q
............ zZ
........, "'" Z -i
....,~ zo
"::: Q'I
'....
;0
~
(J1N
99
0(0
q,-/>:.
'"Q
Q
OZ
;o-i
9:0
Z'I
',:::: ~ INDUSTRY WAY
" - ~ - -
'....r---~---_._-- --~---
... 111
R ~. SOO'06"4"Wf--1oo.nR''''
<10007" - _ ~\-
. 19 187.36' ~40'8f~/""
f ....
y
,
1
I
L:) <x
~ 0
Ul
t-- 0
~ )> 0
r
~ rrl ....,.\c...
z ~ ...-,\'" -- "?z.
'I
r-- I"T]
rrl
-i
OJ
0
n
n::1
WATER MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of _, 20_between R.T. Nahas Company of Idaho. an Idaho
Corporation, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and
property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed
by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from
time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good
and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-
of-way for an easement for the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement of a water main over and
across the following described property:
(SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their
allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto. repair and replacement
at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors
and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after
making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line,
Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to
undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing,
replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there
in violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any
permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this
easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the pu rposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-
way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public
street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such
boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further
effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of
Water Main Easement Page I
the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey
said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures
the day and year first herein above written.
resIdent /Cot? e-,-z-.r t.v.
Secretary
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this :3 /4day of (f)~ , 20 O~ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State, personally appeared Ko6 -P, v-t V), /lJd/M. S and
, known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the
corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation
executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
fist above written.
. PU:'..\.'
J'~"""'" /
'-'Irf 0;: I . ~
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
~~
Resldmg at / d
Commission Expires: cJ-/ Ol '3 / CJ 2'"
; ~
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
Water Main Easement
Page 2
Roylance & Associates P .A.
i
Engineers · Surveyors · Landplanners
I
Telept,une (208) 939-2824 Fax (208) 939-2855
391 W. State Street, Suite E, Eagle, Idaho &u 16
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Exhibit A
October 31, 2002
Project No. 2304
Legal Description of Waterline Easement
R. T. Nahas Company of Idaho
2,466 Square Foot Easement
An underground water line easement across a portion of Parcel A for the benefit of Parcel B.
Said parcels being as shown on Property Line Adjustment Survey No. 5947, Records of Ada County,
Idaho. Said easement being located in the Southwest ':4 of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 1
East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a found Y2 inch iron rod monumenting the most northerly comer of said Parcel A,
thence South 380-55' -52" East along said northerly line of Parcel A, a distance of 143.31 feet
to a found 1/2 inch iron rod, thence South 670-54'-24" East a distance of 162.70 feet to a
point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING:
The said easement being 10 feet both sides of the following described line:
Thence South 220-30' -00" West a distance of 43.69 feet to a point;
Thence South 000-00'-00" East a distance of67.82 feet to a point;
The said easement being 13 feet northerly and 7 feet southerly of the following described line:
Thence NOlth 000-00' -00" West a distance of 14.79 feet to a point and the terminus of said
easement.
The above described easement contains 2,466 square feet, more or less, subject to all existing
easements and rights-of-way.
Prepared By:
ROYLANCE & ASSOCIATES P.A.
391 W. STATE STREET, SUITE E
EAGLE, IDAHO 836L6
(208) 939-2824 (208) 939-2855 (FAX)
X"\PROJECTS\Nahas\227!!\AdTllIn\Lcgals\walcrhnc no. 3 doc
~: -
-
-0
9
oZ
:;0-1
9.0
z-n
~..._wp.'f ------
~.!'~ - - - - - ------_.~/
~- -- --------"----
-1-- - -....:f&-- ----- - ---- - - - - - -- - - ------
-- --------------
.
-
---y.r- ----
~
~
~~
tnm
\;
\
\
".
I
J
/
I
~1
J
I
I
I
.. / (1)-0
r>10
,,-
_Z
Z-I
~o
Z-n
"
VI
0
<A
f: 0
i"1i ~ '?l..
:z .....,C'
.."
~
-I
(1l
0
I
J
/
December 6,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST
Decem ber 10, 2002
ITEM NO.
3'-H
Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No. 1 - Capital Development:
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FI RE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
I DAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
See Attached Memo I Easement
~
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
RECEIVED
To: Mayor & Council
IFrom:Gary D. Smith, PE
cc: file
Date:: December 5, 2002
He:: Baldwin Park Subd. No.1 - Sanitary Sewer Easement
DEe = 5 2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Attached is a sanitary sewer easement in favor of the City of Meridian, granted by the
developers of this subdivision. The easement insures future access to the sewer trunk
across this developer's property, which is outside of their Phase No.1, for extension to the
north to serve other properties.
We respectfully request your approval of this grant of sewer easement.
bralY,
Gary ~mithl PE
From the desk of...
Gal}' D. Smith, PE
Public Works Director
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Mel'idian. Idaho 83642
e Page 1
(208) 893-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
SANIT ARY SEWER EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this 2nd day of October, 2002 between Capital Development Inc.
the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises
and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be
constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer
line over and across the following described property:
Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 36, TAN., R.t W., B.M., thence S
00015' 17" W 1557.35 feet along the west line of said Section 36 to a point;
thence S 89044'43" E 48.00 feet to a point on the east right-of-way ofN. Linder
Road, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Thence continuing S 89044'43" E 187.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 0001 5' I 7" W 107.20 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence along a curve to the left 39.06 feet, said curve having a radius of25.00
feet, a delta angle of 8903 1 '48", tangents of24.80 feet, and a long chord bearing S
44030'37" E 35.21 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence S 89016'31" E 106.20 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence along a curve to the right 35.03 feet, said curve having a radius of755.00
feet, a delta angle of 02039'30", tangents of I 7.52 feet, and a long chord bearing S
87056'46" E 35.03 feet to a point;
Thence S 00015' 17" W 157.20 feet to a point;
Thence N 83035' 58" W 20.12 feet to a point;
C:\DOCUME-l \steve\LOCALS~ I \Temp\EASMT.SWR.doc
Page I
Thence N 00015'1 T' E 105.86 feet to a point on a curve;
Thence along a curve to the left 15.42 feet, said curve having a radius 0005.00
feet, a delta angle of 01 015' 1 2", tangents of7. 71 feet, and a long chord bearing N
88038'55" W 15.42 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence N 89016'31" W 106.20 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence along a curve to the right 117.19 feet, said curve having a radius of 75.00
feet, a delta angle of89031 '48", tangents of 74.39 feet, and a long chord bearing
N 44030'37" W 105.63 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence N 00015' 17" E 77.20 feet to a point;
Thence N 89044'43" W 137.00 feet to a point on the east right-of-way ofN.
Linder Road;
Thence N 00015'17" E 30.00 feet along said right-of-way to the REAL POINT
OF BEGINNING of this description.
(See Exhibit 'A')
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary
sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement
at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all
times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
C:\DOCUME-l \steve\LOCALS-1 \ Temp\EASMT.S WR.doc
Page 2
I .-t.)...J
...... I '" __ .... ___ --..... --.
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of. or lie within the boundaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described trdct ofland. and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said ea."iement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above vmtten.
Capital Development Company
.7
STATE OF IDAHO)
) 55
County of Ada )
On this -I.iJ;_~ day of October, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared J. Ramon Vargason and
. Marilyn Yorgason ,known or identified to me to be the persons who executed the
wiThin instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year fist above written.
1 ...tL 4 .... ...... AL .A. A.......:a.-~:..L..-~~....\k...~.~1
t DeVONA D. LUKE J
: ~~~1R~:'~~y
&u/~ 4J,~
NOTARY PUBUC .fOR IDAHO
Residing at B 0 i s e, I d aha
My Commission Expires: 08/27 /05
C:\proj ects\200Q\07\0704- Bald win P ark\Correspondence\O ut--going\EASMT .SWR. doc
Page 3
......... _... ..._'--'....... '-J_-_'--'
(
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDlAN
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
C:\projec r:s\2000\07\0704w Baldwin Park\Correspoodence\Out-going\EASMT .SWR.doc
r.~<f
Page 4
I I
. f
J
'"
r- .
~I
......
~I
Ul
I
S B9' 44' 4.3"E
I- 4B.00'
N OO'15'17"[J
.30.00'
I
REVISION ;
SHEET ;
EXHIBIT "A"
20907-SSEASE.DWG
IV
CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD CHORD.BRG~:.,,"
C1 89'31'48" 25.00 39.06 24.80 35.21 S 44'30'37" E
C2 02' 39'30" 755.00 35.03 17.52 35.03 S 87'56'46" E
C3 01'15'12" 705.00 15.42 7.71 15.42 N 88'38'55" W
C4 89'31 '48" 75.00 117.19 74.39 105.63 N 44'30'37" W
BLOCK
114
I
0 I
<(
0
0::: I
0::: 14
w
0
z
:J
z
:z:
12
10
l
"-.
18
19
21
20
22
W. WHITE SANDS DRIVE
9 10 1 1 12
13
BLOCK 6
2
8 7 6
4
W. GR[A T BASiN DRIVE
9
6
8
5
4
BLOCK
~ MONU~T STREET- -N 8J.~l~~~,,~
C- II'
---
BY,
-
==)
r---_
BALDWIN PARK
SUBDIVISION NO. 2
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
(nl "Ie
[ BRIGGS J
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
ENGINEERS PlANNERS SURVEYORS
1800 W. OVERlNW ROAD' BOISE. IDAHO 83705 . (208)344-9700
DWG DATE;
10/02/02
owe NO.
20907
SCALE;
1 """ 1 00'
These drowinqs, or any portion thereor, sholl nol be used
00 any Project or ..teosloos or this Project ..c.pt by
I'\I'r~lten ogreement from Briggs Engineeriny. Inc.
December 6, 2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
December 10, 2002
ITEM NO.
~::S - I
REQUEST Approve Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance -- Audio Electronics Inc.:
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
~re/
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
i
~ Audio Electronics Inc. 722 E. 2nd st. Meridian, Idaho 83642
ELECTRONic SYSTEMS CONTRACTORS (208) 888-2331
(208) 888-2332 FAX
1 -800-683-2331
December 3, 2002
Meridian Police Department
1401 East Water Tower
Meridian, Idaho 83642
.RECEIVED
DEe - 5 2002
Attention: Jean
Re: Fire Alarm System
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Jean,
Please find enclosed the preventive maintenance agreement as we discussed on the
telephone. The highlighted areas will need to be filled in. Please return the signed original
copy to our office. If questions or concerns should arise please do not hesitate to call.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
Craig Thomson
AEI Service and Installation
Meridian City Council
December 10, 2002
Page 2 of 37
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: With that, then, I would move that we approve the agenda as noted.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: All right. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the agenda as
corrected. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say
aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 3.
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12,2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting:
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview:
E. Off-site Sewer and Water Line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer:
F. Sewer and Water line EasementJ Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.:
G. Water Line Easement - R.T. Nahas:
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park Subdivision No.1 - Capital
Development:
I. Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance - Audio
Electronics, Inc.:
J. Recommendation from the City Parks and Recreation
Department for partnerships.
Meridian City Councll
December 10, 2002
Page 3 of 37
Corrie: Item 3 is the Consent Agenda. We do have the addition of Item J.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda, with the addition of Item J,
and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper papers.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda,
with the inclusion of Item J on the Parks recommendation. Any further discussion?
Hearing none, roll call vote, Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call vote: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, absent; Bird, aye.
Corrie: Okay. All ayes. Motion approved on the Consent Agenda.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 4.
Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department:
1. 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension -
Professional Services Contract, Keller Associates:
Corrie: Item Number 4 is Department Reports. Item A, Public Works Department. One
is the 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension - Professional Services
Contract, Keller Associates. Mr. Watson.
Watson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Members. I had intended for this to go on
the Consent Agenda, so I won't bore you with the details. What this involves is a
Design Contract with Keller Associates to bring water under the Interstate for the
Touchmark project to the south side of the Interstate, which used to be -- I think it's
called the Elk's property or something like that. It's the southeast corner of the 1-84 and
Eagle Road Interchange and bring water all the way over to Overland Road.
Silverstone Subdivision is right there in that general area. Our modeling has shown that
this is probably -- probably will be a needed connection as Touchmark and Silverstone
develop out and Keller has done a lot of work for us in the past, as you well know. The
estimated construction cost, just ballpark right now, is about 300,000. They are
proposing a Professional Services Agreement of 24,800 and we would recommend
approval of the contract for that amount. I would be happy to answer any questions.
/
AUDIO ELECTROJ. .1CS, INC.
PO BOX 517---MERIDIAN, lD. 83680---PHONE (208) 888-2331--FAX (208) ~88-2332
~,
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
CONTRACT NUMBER:
'i 1 n. 0
This agreement is in full force for n period of FI V;:_
V E/-l/{S effective on the date it is accepted al
Audio Electronics, Inc. The agreemenl is rcnewublc
according to the terms contained herei 11 and is betwccn Audio
Electronics. Inc. (Hereinaner wrinen as AEI) and
CUSTOMER fi1b'?/.I?/R# PAUc~ O~O/
ADDRESS /~;JI PAST 4J&&A' MW/bf"
CITY JJ?MIO//?<v' STATE ..z:J:/
BILLING ATIN: t7"9Jl/Y'
BUILDING LOCATION . <'/,9/J19-..
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
This agrccmcnt covers lhe cquipmcl1l ;IS identified in the
Customer Equipment Record allaehed.
1. AEllhrough its field service representalive, will make onc
regularly scheduled scrviee ClII1 at--L.::Z-monlh
illlervals. The following services will be performed wilhin
the agreement period for lhe equipment specified on lhe
Cuslomer Equipment Rccord.
a. Clean, adjust and test all control equipment.
b. IlISped all oullying initiating and indicating dcvices.
c. Provide labor to replace defcctive parts. as required.
2. The regularly scheduled scn'iee calls will be established
for the mutual convenience of AEI and ils customer. The
customer will assist thc AEI represemalive in perfonning lhe
required Icsls. Customer will be required to oversee the
control panel and inform the AEI reprcsenlalive of alarm
conditions, to resct the panel and monitor Ihe lcsts. Where it
is nC(;CSsary 10 usc ladders or move cquipmelllto perform
tests of delectors, elc., the cuslomer shall provide Ihe ladders
and such labor asststallce as lIlay be necessary.
3. The charge for this eonlrael is $...2....6Mineluding all
travel lime and labor, as described in Paragraph I, and is
pa~'able in paymenl(s) of,$ "f;;)"O : It docs not incl~de
an)' materials, or parts that may be reqUIred. The aforesaid
annual charge also docs 1I0t include labor on eleclrical
systems or wiring exlemalto Ihe equipment listed 011 Ihe
Customer Equipment Record,
4. The customer will purchase from AEI spare parts to
supporllhe Preventive Maintenance program. Spare parts
witl be sold by AEllo the .01~r at the most recenl
published Iisl price less 0 pen:ent.
5.n) Service cans above and bc)'ond regularly scheduled
services arc not within the charge quoled above. Such calls
shall be ehar~ al0ElllOrmal hourly labor rales ill effect al
that time, tess d discount. Calls will be responded 10
belween lhe hours of8 A.M. to 4:30 P.M, Monday through
Friel,),. except hoJida)'s.
5.b) In addition to 5,a) above. emergency service culls
outside oflhe hours listcd in 5.a) will be provided atlhe
customer's request. Such emergency calls shall be
charged at 1 1/2 limes the normal hourly ralC,
6. This agreement is automatically renewed by ;lIId 1.Jclwccn
AE:1 and lhe above-named ellSlomer unless AEI or Ihe
customer notifies Ihd'o!hcr in wriliug Ihirty d.,ys or more
prior to lhe expiration date of this conlrncl.
7. AElmay modify the nnmlal charge at the renewal dale
and Ihe agreement shall otherwise continue wilhout change.
However, Ihe CUSlomer may nolify AEI wilhinlhirty days of
receipt of the modHicalion that il elccls to terminate
rather I hall accept the new annllal ehargc.
8. A sen'ice call may be expanded al Ihe diS(;rclioll of the
AEI Technical Represcntative to u regular scheduled call.
9. Rouline muinlenance covcred by Ihis agreement shall
be performed ollly by a AEI Service ReprescllIalivc or
Service Technician.
LIMITS OF LIAnUXfY
AEI WILL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY EQUIPMENT
COVERED BY TillS AGREEMENT UPON WIflCH IT
IS WORKING, WIIlCIIIS DIRECTLY DAMAGED BY
AEI ON SITE IN THE COURSE OF PERFORMING ITS
SERVICE. SUCII OBLIGATION IS IN LIEU OF ALL
WARRANTIES. EXPRESSED OR iMPLIED, IN FACT
OR BY LAW. TillS AGREEMENT SITES AEI'S
ENTIRE AND EXCLUSIVE LIABILITY AND SETS
FORTH TUE ENTlRi': AND EXCLUSIVE RiGHT OF
TUE CUSTOMER AGAINST AEI ARISING OUT OF
TilE SUPPLY OF TilE SERVICE. IT IS AGREED
TIIA T AEI WILL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR
ANY FURTHER DIRECT OR ANY INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE
WHATSOEVER.
This agreement does not apllIy to major repairs to, or
replacement of, the equipment subject to this agreement,
whether ~ueh major repairs be required by reasOn of
vandalism, flooding, fire, lighting, power failure,
installalion of Incompatlblc equipment, improper
ollCl'ating procedure. or by any CllUIle beyond the control
of AEL
No repreuntallont of any kind have been made by AEI to
Its customer except liS ~t fonh herein and this document
contains tbe entire agreement between the Ilartles.
SIGNATURE
EFFECTIVE DA!J1. -
/lhf'fkct ~dlu4.c...:::-- fl" (>;)
- 7. (:)
COMPANY ACCEPTANCE ~ U ...~ 0;::'
S "'0 'er lS'1 . X' <i
AU/)JO EI.ECl'RONIG\', /NC. "",.,//"1 CO,,,, ,.,( , O~"",
PO BOX 517 '... '., ."",
MERIDIAN, ID. 83
SIGNATURE
TITLE
AUDIO ELI1~TRONICS, INC.
PO BOX 5 I 7---MERlDIAN, 10. 83680---PHONE (208) 888-233 I--FAX (208) 888.2332
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
CONTRACT NUMBER:
')100
This agreemenl is in full force for a period of F/ V F.
V E/l t<S effective on lhe dale il is acccpted at
Audio Electronics. Inc. The agrccment is renewable
according to the tenns contained hcrcin and is between Audio
Electronics. Inc. (Hereinafier written as AEI) and
CUSTOMERA1.6R1...?//?AI P&..Ick O~-//,.-
ADDRESS j/-f/J/ PAST 4/1?R--A ~/..6f'
CITY m~/O//?h' STATE ...z:;:;
BILLING ATIN: 1..79J1/Y'
BUILDING LOCATION , )'..;7/71::2-
EQUIPMENT DESCRlPTION
This agreemcnt covers the equipmcnt as idcntified in the
Customer Equipment Record attached.
t. AElthrough its field service rcpresentmivc, will make one
rcgularly scheduled servicc call at ~month
intervals. The fotloning services will be perfonned within
t he agreement period for the equipmcnl sp;:cified on the
Cll5tomer Equipment Record.
a. Clean, adjust and test all eonlrol equipment.
b. Inspect all outlying initiating and indicating devices.
c. Provide labor to replace defective parts, as required.
2. The regularly scheduled service calls will be cstablished
for the mUlual convenience of AEI and its customer. The
customer will assist the AEI representative in perfonning the
required tests. Customer will be required to oversee the
conlrol panel and inform the AEI representative of alann
conditions. to reset the panel and monitor the tests. Where it
is necessary to use ladders or move equipment to perfoon
tests of detectors, etc., Ihe customer shall provide the ladders
and such labor assistance as may be nl:(;essary.
3. The charge for this contract is $ .a...6dt2.Jncluding all
travel time and labor, as described in Paragraph I, and is
payablc in paymcnt(s) of S ,.?-O . II does nol incl~de
IIny materials. or parts that ma)' be required. The aforesaid
annual charge also docs not include labor on electrical
systems or wi ring e:l:ternalto the equipment listed on Ihe
Customer Equipment Record.
4. The customer will purchase from AEI spare parts to
support the Preventive Maintenance program. Spare parts
wiII be sold by AEI to the c~t%: althe most r~ent
published list price less --L. '" reent.
5.a) Service t.1lls above and beyond regularly scheduled
services are not within the charge quoted above. Such calls
shall be char~~ at0EI normal hourly labor rates in efTl:(;t at
lhaltime, less a discount. Calls will be responded to
betwccntbe hours of8 AM. to 4;30 P.M. Monday through
Friday. e:l:ccpt holidays.
5.b) In addition to 5.a) abovc. emergency service calls
outside of the hours listed in 5..1) will be provided .11 the
customer's request. Such emergency calls shall be
charged .11 I 1/2 limes the normal hourly ratc.
6. This agreement is automatically renewed by and betwccn
AEI and lhe above-named cuslomer unlcss AEI or the
customer notifies Ih'rl Qther in writing thirty days or more
prior 10 the expiration dale of !his contract
7. AEI may modify the annual charge at the renewal date
and Ihe agreement shall othel'\~ise continue without changc.
However. the customer may notify AEI within thirty days of
receipt of the modification that it elects to terminate
rather tha n accept the new annual charge.
8. A sCf\'ice call may be expanded at the discretion of the
AEI Technical Representalive to a regular scheduled call.
9. Routinc mainlenance covered by this agreement shall
be pcrfommd only by a AEI Service Represenlative or
Service Technician.
LIMITS OF LIABILITY
AEI WILL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY EQUIPMENT
COVERED BY THIS AGREEMENT UPON WHICH IT
IS WORKING, WHICH IS DIRECTLY DAMAGED BY
AEI ON SITE IN THE COURSE OF PERFORMING ITS
SERVICE. SUCH OBLIGATION IS IN LIEU OF ALL
WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IN FACT
OR BY LAW. TIllS AGREEMENT SITES AEI'S
ENTIRE AND EXCLUSIVE LIABiLITY AND SETS
FORTH THE ENTIRE AND EXCLUSIVE RIGHT OF
THE CUSTOMER AGAINST AEI ARISING OUT OF
TilE SUPPLY OF THE SERVICE. IT IS AGREED
THA T AEI WILL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR
ANY FURTIIER DIRECT OR ANY INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE
WlIATSOEVER
This agreement docs not apply to major ~paln to, or
replacement of, the equipment subject to this agreement,
whether S\lch major ~pairs be required by reason of
,'andallsm, flooding, fire, lighting, power failure.
installation of Ineompatlble equipment, improper
operating pl'O(edure. or by any cause myond the control
of AEL
No representatlons of any kind have been made by AEI to
its customer e~cept liS set fortb herein and this document
contains the entire agreement between the parties.
CUSTOMER ACCEPT ANtE
CUSTOMER /J1~n//?/? ~L/c& D~
ADDRESS II../(J J &7ST ttI/7TE/?Z;;;~fi
CITY 17?R"q//J/#/7 STATE .z:L> ZIP~.;z
NAME
TITLE
SIGNATURE DATE_
EFFECTIVE DATE ~)~M _~
COMPANY ACCEPTANCE
A UD/O ELECTRON/CS, INC.
PO BOX St7
MERIDIAN, 10. 83 11
December 6,2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Public Works Department
December 10,2002
ITEM NO. ~. - A - I
REQUEST 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension - Professional Services Contract,
Keller Associates:
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH;
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER;
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See Attached Memo / Agreement
~vP
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
REC IT
DEe ~ 5 2002
To: Brad Watson /J /} fL.
from: Lenard Grady (/<' ~
cc: Gary Smith
Date: 10/17/2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
IRe: Proposed Agenda Items for December 10, 2002 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
December 10 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
':)t:. 2003 Touchmark CrossinQ Water Main Extension - Professional Services Contract.
Attached is an agreement for professional services with Keller Associates for design,
easement acquisition selVices, and limited construction services for a total of $24,800. Once
complete, the water pipe will provide another waterline crossing under 1-84, which will
significantly improve water distribution. This will result in improved fire flows and better pump
utilization.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the contract with Keller Associates for professional
services on the 2003 T ouchmark Crossing Water Main Extension for $24,800
and authorize the Mayor to sign it
Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction SelVices Contract. Attached is an
agreement for professional sSlVices totaling $74,800 with Carollo Engineers for construction
selVices. They have completed the design and bid documents
and the project is currently bidding. The construction costs is
estimated to be over $900,000.
From the de;]{ of...
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works
Department recommends that City Council approve
the contract with Carollo Engineers for construction
Lenard Grady
Staff'Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Waterto,^'e1', Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
gmdyl@Ci.mcridianJd.us
Ci!l Page 1
(
services on the Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project for $74,800 and
authorize the Mayor to sign it
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
ED Page 2
December 5,2002
ATTACHMENT "A"
AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
For the
2003 TOUCHMARK CROSSING WATER MAIN EXTENSION
SECTION I
Owner Information and Responsibilities:
The following data and/or services are to be provided by the OWNER without cost to the
CONSULTANT.
A. Provide ongoing review of the CONSULTANT work and timely consideration of policy issues at
a time acceptable to both the OWNER and CONSULTANT.
B. Provide access to relevant record drawings, master plans, county GIS mapping, base mapping
with contours in AutoCAD, and other relevant information of record.
C. Execute and pay for all necessary right-of-way or easements for construction. Provide assistance
and review during the easement acquisition process.
D. Request, pay for, and provide necessary title reports to CONSULTANT (2 title reports are
anticipated).
E. Construction staking.
F. Provide pipe sizes for water main size(s). The proposed water main construction will consist of
approximately 810 If of 12-inch main, and 2,805 If of 16-inch main, of which 225 feet will be
bored beneath Interstate 84.
G. Review and execute any necessary agency developed agreements with the owner of
irrigation/drainage facilities, if needed.
H. Review and execute necessary agency developed agreements related to utility crossing of ACHD
and ITD controlled right-of-way. CONSULTANT will provide work related to legal descriptions,
mapping, and the Right-of Way Encroachment Application and Permit for Utilities.
I. OWNER will provide CONSULT ANT with aerial photographs, 2-foot contour mapping, and
GIS Mapping for the project area. CONSULTANT intends to use the 2-foot contour mapping
supplemented by surveyed topographic information for the project design.
02074102.555
-1-
Auachmenl "A"
December 5, 2002
SECTION 2
Preliminary Alienment Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.1 Proiect Updates
Throughout the length of the project, the CONSULTANT will submit a monthly progress report
that includes a current invoice, a description of the completed tasks, estimate of percent
completion, and other relevant information related to the project schedule.
2.2 Aerial Photos
OWNER will provide to CONSULTANT.
2.3 Spot Elevation Survey
Perform spot elevation survey within project area generally bounded by Eagle Road, Overland
Road, the southerly line of St. Luke's Meridian, and the southwesterly line of the ToucIunark
Development. The intent of this survey is to supplement the contour mapping provided by the
OWNER and to confirm elevations that may be needed in the Preliminary Aligrunent Analyses.
This work does not include a full topographic survey.
2.4 Review Preliminary Aligrunent
Using GIS mapping provided by the OWNER, existing contour mapping, spot elevation data,
and findings from the Preliminary Site Survey and utility investigation, review the preliminary
horizontal alignment for the main. Vertical profiles will not be developed at this time, except at
boring and crossing locations. Boring will be required for the north south main extension across
1-84 (approximately 225 feet). There will be one significant crossing to design and construct at
Five Mile Creek, just downstream of the confluence of Eight Mile and Five Mile Creeks. Meet
with OWNER to review concept and get concurrence. CONSULTANT will initiate coordination
with ITD, ACHD, and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District regarding aJigrunent within the State
right-of-way and the proposed boring and crossing.
2.5 Initial Property Owner Contacts
Make initial contact with property owners to review preliminary aligrunent and request donation
of easement to the OWNER. Seek input, comments, and concerns from property owners. Have
property owners sign a permission letter to access property. Document results. rt is anticipated
that permanent easements will be required from St. Luke's Meridian, and the ToucIunark
Development. In addition, depending on the horizontal aligrunent, a temporary construction
easement maybe required from the Idaho Elks Rehab Foundation to provide sufficient space for
boring operations.
2.6 City of Meridian Review
Meet with the OWNER to review the findings of the preliminary alignment review and property
owner contacts. Make decisions regarding changes related to the preliminary alignment.
2.7 Revise Preliminary Aligrunent
Revise the preliminary horizontal alignment.
02074/02-555
-2-
Auachmenl "A"
December 5, 2002
2.8 Second Property Owner Contacts
Make second contacts with property owners to review the revised alignment. Seek input,
comments, and concerns. Document results to OWNER and property owners.
2.9 Agency Coordination (lTD. ACHD. Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District)
Coordinate with ITD, ACHD, Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, and utility companies. Write
a letter to confirm findings and initiate the process to develop a crossing agreement with Nampa-
Meridian Irrigation District Prepare draft of the Right-of-Way Encroachment Application and
Permit for Utilities for submission to ITD. The OWNER will review and execute any necessary
agency agreements.
2.11 Select Alignment
Compile property owner comments and meet with the OWNER to review project status. Make
selection of preferred alignment and issue a notice to proceed with other design tasks.
Easement Acquisition Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The anticipated scope involves work related to three (3) parcels. It is anticipated that the majority of the
alignment will be located within existing ITD and ACHD right-of-way, and that easement acquisition
will only be required form St. Luke's Meridian and Touchmark Development. CONSUL T ANT
anticipates that three contacts will be required for each property owner to obtain the necessary easements
for the project. The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.12 Title Reports
Title Reports will be reviewed for the St. Luke's Meridian Parcel and the Touchmark
Development. OWNER will request, pay for, and provide CONSULTANT with the necessary
title reports (two reports are anticipated).
2.13 Parcel Map
Develop a parcel base map showing parcel boundaries and right-of-way for the project.
Incorporate design work developed as part of the Design Section of this scope.
2.14 Legal Descriptions & Maps
Using City standards, write metes and bounds legal descriptions for the permanent easements
(two are anticipated). Develop a map in AutoCAD to serve as an attachment to the legal
descri ptions.
2.15 Appraisals
We do not anticipate the need for appraisals and have not included them in our fee. However, if
St. Luke's or Touchmark are unwilling to donate easements, appraisals may be necessary to
establish fair market value of the easements for payment by the OWNER.
2.16 Easement Contract Forms
Complete an easement form for each parcel. Include special conditions or requirements of the
contract and attach legal description and map. Submit package to OWNER. OWNER will
proceed with execution of the contract, make payments, and execution and recording of the
formal "Grant of Easement".
02074102-555
-3-
Attachment "A"
December 5, 2002
Environmental Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
It is anticipated that work related to the project will be within a developed, previously disturbed right-of-
way corridor. Thus, CONSULTANT does not anticipate, and has not included, environmental services
within this Scope of Services. Such environmental services include work related to wetlands (404
permitting), cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, or flood plain modeling.
Design Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.17 Pre-Design Meeting
A Pre-Design Meeting/Scoping Session has already occurred with the City of Meridian.
Schematic preliminary alignment alternatives and items to be provided to CONSULTANT by the
OWNER were identified (GIS and aerial mapping). To simplify the process and minimize
expense, we do not feel that an additional Pre-Design Meeting is necessary.
2.18 Utility Research
The CONSULTANT shall contact and receive utility information from affected utilities
including, but not limited to, gas, power, telephone, storm drainage, cable T.V., irrigation, and
other utilities which may be affected by the proposed construction. The CONSULTANT will use
<<Dig-Line" to verify utility line locations. Actual field pot-holing may be necessary at specific
crossing locations depending on proximity to the project, and the level of as-built detail
available. We are aware that fiber optic cable was recently installed along the northerly line of
the 1-84 corridor and would likely be a candidate for pot-holing activities. We estimate that a
minimum of six pothole locations will be required for the project. We have not included pot-
holing services within this Scope of Services. Rather, with CONSULTANT direction, OWNER
will provide pot-holing services at OWNER's expense.
2.19 Final Agency Coordination
Finalize work related to the ITD right-of-way encroachment application and permit for utilities.
Facilitate finalization of Five Mile Creek crossing agreement through Nampa-Meridian Irrigation
District. Coordinate with ACHD and obtain plan approval. Coordinate with other miscellaneous
uti I i ties.
2.20 Design
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing the design in conformance with local
agencies' policies including ACHD, !TO, and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, and shall be
responsible for consideration of traffic access, pipeline alignments and grades at boring and
crossing locations, and other items necessary for proper construction of the project. A crossing
agreement will be required between Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian
for the Five Mile Creek crossing. CONSULTANT will coordinate with Nampa-Meridian and
their attorney to ultimately secure the crossing agreement. The OWNER will pay Ringert-Clark
Chartered Lawyers directly for legal expenses related to drafting and executing the crossing
agreement.
02074/02-555
-4-
Attachment "A"
December 5, 2002
2.21 Pipe Analysis
The CONSULTANT will not be performing pipe analysis. Rather, the OWNER has identified
that the project will include approximately 810 If of 12-inch main, and 2,805 If of 16-inch main,
of which 225 feet will be bored beneath Interstate 84.
2.22 Note Reduction, Mapping & Design Drafting
The CONSULTANT shall perform topographical survey data mapping and design drafting in an
AutoCAD format Version 2000. The scale of the full size drawings (22" x 34") shall be 1" =
20'H and 1 "=2'V and shall include Meridian City standard notes, vicinity maps, sheet indexes,
north arrows, and bar scales. The design drawing shall utilize the ISPWC standard symbols and
shall identify pipe size and type, pipe slope, invert elevations, surface repair required, adjacent
property addresses, property lines, right-of-way, street names, elevation benchmarks, survey
control, topographic features, utilities, and any special details necessary for a high quality,
bidable project. The drafting shall be performed on 22" x 34" vellum. CONSULTANT will
provide reduced scale drawings (1 "=40'H and I "=4' V) for bidding purposes.
2.23 Specifications and Contract Documents
Specifications and Contract Documents shall be in accordance with City of Meridian Standard
Details and Specifications, and the current edition of the Idaho Standard Public Works
Construction (ISPWC). The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing plans and
specifications for bidding and bid document packages (20 packages total).
2.24 Plan Review
Upon 75% completion of the plans and specifications, the CONSULTANT shall submit review
sets of plans to all affected utilities, ITO, ACHD, DEQ, and three sets for the OWNER's review
and comments.
2.25 Revisions
The CONSULTANT shall incorporate all reVISIons as suggested by the OWNER and other
agencies in the final set of plans and specifications.
2.26 Oeliverables to the OWNER
Deliverables shall include 20 bid packages that will contain specifications and reduced scale
project plans.
2.27 Opinion of Probable Cost
The CONSULTANT shall prepare an opinion of probable construction costs at two different
times during the project. Near the conclusion of preliminary design an opinion of probable cost
will be developed for each alternative alignment under consideration in the preliminary design
process. These estimates will be presented to the OWNER during the final selection alignment
meeting. These preliminary opinions of probable cost will include probable cost estimates only
for any alignments still under consideration at the time. The opinion of probable cost for the
final selected pipeline alignment will be updated to include easement acquisition (if required). A
final design opinion of probable cost will also be prepared that will include all land acquisition,
easement, and water main construction costs. This final design opinion of probable cost will be
modified during the bidding process to include just an opinion of probable construction cost
which will be used for evaluating the contractor bids.
02074/02-555
-5-
Auachmclll "A"
December 5,2002
Construction Assistance Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
Items 2.28 through 2.34 will be performed by the CONSULTANT on an hourly rate basis if requested by
the OWNER.
2.28 Pre-Bid, Bid and A ward
The CONSULTANT shall attend pre-bid meeting and walk-through, and answer all technical
questions referred to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER relating to the project during the bid
and award process.
2.29 Addenda
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULTANT shall prepare addenda as necessary during
the bid process to clarify bidding requirements. The OWNER will distribute addenda as
required.
2.30 Pre-Construction Conference
The CONSULTANT shall attend a pre-construction conference for this project. The OWNER
shall make all of the necessary arrangements for time, date, and place.
2.31 Construction Review
The CONSULTANT shall be available for construction review and technical consultation as
requested by the OWNER while the project is being constructed. Attend bi-weekly review
meetings for project cost, schedules, problems, and tour project site. This work is based on a
forty five (45) calendar day construction period.
2.32 Shop Drawing Review
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for any necessary
shop drawing reviews for the project.
2.33 Change Orders
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULTANT shall participate in the negotiation and
preparation for any necessary change orders for the project.
2.34 Record Drawings
The CONSULT ANT shall prepare final record drawings documenting all manhole locations,
elevations of manhole rings and inverts, and any other documented plan changes that were made
during the construction process.
Topographic and Design Survey to be Performed bv the CONSULTANT:
The Consultant shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.35 Monument Replacement
The CONSULT ANT shall reference on the map and tie down the location of all found
monuments. If monuments are disturbed during construction, the CONSULTANT shall replace
said monuments to their referenced position.
02074/02-555
-6-
Attachment "A"
December 5, 2002
2.36 Monument, Record Map, and Benchmark Research
The CONSULTANT shall research the Ada County Surveyor's records for survey monuments
for the purpose of horizontal control for the project. The CONSULTANT will locate in the field
monuments of record which may be disrupted as a part of the construction. The CONS UL T ANT
shall reference these monuments on the Construction Plans provided to the OWNER. The
vertical datum shall be the NA VD 88 Datum.
2.37 Topographic Survey
The CONSULTANT shall perform a topographic survey along the preferred and selected
alignment; generally north of Overland Road, and east of Eagle Road, and south of St. Luke's
Meridian. The survey shall locate all relevant features necessary for a proper design of the
project. As a minimum, all items that are not accurately reflected on the GIS mapping provided
by the OWNER shall be surveyed within 25 feet of the proposed alignment. These items shall
include detailed information to develop a cross section across 1-84, pertinent information at the
Five Mile creek crossing, wells, streets, outlines of buildings, significant vegetation, sidewalks,
driveways, utilities, building finish floor elevations, ditches, drainage ways, trees, centerline
elevations, and shall also include a search for monuments of record and a physical survey of
monuments that are found. We anticipate that many of the surface features listed above will be
accurately depicted on the project aerial photograph and will not require topographic survey.
2.38 Construction Survey Control
The CONSULTANT shall set temporary benchmarks (TBMs) and horizontal control points at
500 feet intervals along the alignment of the project. TBMs and horizontal control points shall
be delineated on the final Construction Plans provided to the OWNER.
Proiect Schedule for the CONSULTANT:
2.39 Schedule
The project schedule is based on construction ending 4/17/03. This schedule is contingent upon
the success of acquiring easements, successful coordination with ITO, timely reviews by the
OWNER, ACHO, DEQ, ITD, and utilities. If at any time during project performance the
CONSUL T ANT expects difficulty in meeting the schedule, the CONSULTANT must notify the
OWNER in writing regarding anticipated schedule delays and specific tasks that are causing the
delays. The CONSULTANT and OWNER shall meet to discuss overall project impacts,
negotiate contract schedule extensions, and determine the proper course of action.
. Start Date 12/09/02
. 75% Review Plans 01/20/03
. Final Plans 02/03/03
. Advertise Project 02/06/03
. Open Bids 02/20/03
. Award Bid 02/27/03
. Begin Construction 03/03/03
. End Construction 04/17/03
02074/02-555
-7-
Attachment "A"
December 5, 2002
NOTE: ACHD plans on beginning construction for the Overland Road / Eagle Road
Intersection Project on March 15, 2003. The above schedule would start the City's contractor
approximately two weeks prior to ACHD's contractor. This should be sufficient time for the
City's contractor to connect into the existing water main near the intersection of Overland Road
and Eagle Road and construct the water main beyond the limits of the ACHD project.
02074/02-555
-8-
Attachment "A"
December 5,2002
SECTION 3
Basis of Fee and Billing Schedule:
The OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for its services and reimbursable expenses as follows:
Preliminary Alignment and Design Services
Items 2.1 through 2.11, and Items 2.17 through 2.27 for a lump sum fee of $17,800.00
Topographic and Design Survey
Item 2.35 through 2.38, on a lump sum basis of $1,900.00
Easement Acquisition Services
Items 2.12 through 2.16, on a time and materials basis estimated at $2,500.00
Construction Assistance Services
Items 2.28 through 2.34, on a time and materials basis estimated at $2,600.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT: $24,800.00
For all services to be paid by the OWNER to the CONSULT ANT for work completed on a time and
materials basis, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for each hour each assigned employee works on the
project in accordance with the attached Title Code Billing Rate schedule. The Title Code Billing Rates
attached include all costs for direct labor, indirect labor, travel costs within the Meridian area, vehicles,
surveying equipment, computer hardware and software, and markup for profit. These Title Code Billing
Rates shall remain in place during the course of the project unless billing rate changes are specifically
approved in writing by the OWNER.
All reimbursable expenses shall be paid at the direct reimbursable expense cost times a multiplier of 1.0.
Reimbursable expenses shall include subconsultants, travel outside of the Meridian area, equipment
rental costs, plan and specification reproduction costs over and above 20 sets of plans and specifications,
and any charges required from aerial companies or the county or city in association with obtaining
survey control and/or GIS data.
02074/02-555
-9-
AHachment "A"
KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
TITLE CODE BILLING RATES
Personnel Hourly Rate
Principal: Jim Keller, P.E. $118.00
Project Managers: Rod Linja, P.E. $1l5.00
Dennis Suihkonen, P .E. $115.00
Susan Burnham, P.E. $102.00
Chief Engineer: David Kinzer, P.E. $115.00
Project Engineers: Donn Carnahan, P .E. $85.00
Jim Mullen, P.E. $85.00
Ryan Adelman, P.E. $75.00
Bryan Phinney, r.E. $75.00
Mike Anderson, E.LT. $64.00
James Bledsoe, E.LT. $67.00
Ross Erickson, E.LT. $67.00
Mike Jaglowski, E.l.T. $69.00
Grant Sanders, E.LT. $64.00
Marla Vik, E.LT. $64.00
Hailey Wappett, E.LT. $60.00
Designers: Ian Crane $54.00
Alan Jones $54.00
Jeny Thornton $54.00
T echnicians/I nspection $48.00
Drafting $45.00
Clerical $40.00
Two-Man Survey Crew $100.00
Mileage Cost $0.32/mile
02074/02-555
-10-
December 5,2002
Attachment" A "
(
December 6, 2002
Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 10, 2002
APPLICANT Public Works Department ITEM NO. if - A - L
REQUEST Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction Services Contract, Carollo
Engineers:
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERI DIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See Attached Memo I Agreement
;J
~pr
Contacted:
Date:
Phone:
MaterJals presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
TASK ORDER NO.3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS (OWNER)
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, A Professional Corporation (ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by the ENGINEER pursuant to the mutual
promises, covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement between the above named parties
dated the 18th of August, 2001 in connection with:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION THICKENE PROJECT
ation shalf be as set forth
nt Services for the City of
PURPOSE
The ENGINEER's scope of services,
herein. Services shall generally be des
Meridian, Dissolved Air Flotation Thicke
ENGINEER's SERVICES
TASK 1 - Field Inspection Services
The ENGINEER shall provide a PartMTime Resident Project Engineer to perform the following tasks:
1.1 Provide on-site inspection of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Field
inspection is budgeted for 6 hours per week assuming inspections will be conducted for 6
months of the 9 month contract time in the project documents. It is understood that the City
will provide personnel for field inspection and communication with the contractor for the
times when the ENGINEER is not onMsite.
1.2 Direct materials testing for soils compaction and concrete slump and compressive strength
in accordance with the Contract Documents. Soils testing laboratory services and concrete
field quality control testing will be provided by the CONTRACTOR.
1.3 Keep a daily written log of construction activities observed at the site on the days of part~time
inspection. Copies of the daily log will be sent to the OWNER and kept by the ENGINEER.
1.4 Issue and document field orders in writing per the Contract Documents. Submit copies to
OWNER.
1.5 Take photographs of construction in progress during each phase of the work. Compile and
maintain photograph prints as a history of the project. Duplicate copies, appropriately
labeled, shall be submitted periodically to the OWNER, suitable for placing in standard
three-ring binders.
-1 "
TASK 2 ~ Contract Administration Services
The purpose of this task is to provide office and field support engineering services during
construction of the project. The ENGINEER will provide specialty inspection services at selected
stages for structural/architectural, mechanical, and electrical/instrumentation. Specific support
services to be provided by the ENGINEER during construction include the following:
2.1 Attend and conduct preconstruction meeting.
2.2 Attend weekly construction meetings, assumed to be no longer than one hour duration.
2.3 Review CONTRACTOR's submittals and shop drawings for conformance with the Contract
Documents. The labor estimate is based on review of submittals required in the project documents
for seventy (70) civil, structural and mechanical sections, at an average review time of 2 hours per
section. Electrical submittals will be reviewed by Subconsultant.
2.4 Assist the OWNER with technical responses to CONTRACTOR's request for information
(RFls), and questions from the field, and other CONTRACTOR requests.
2.5 Evaluate and prepare Change Order requests, if required.
2.6 Review CONTRACTOR's monthly payment requests and progress reports and provide
recommendations to the OWNER for progress payments.
2.7 Assist OW NER with the evaluation of the project at Substantial Completion, and provide the
punch list of items for completion with recommendation for progress payment.
2.8 Provide assistance during start-up and during the OWNER's initial operation of new and
modified facilities. Budget for this item is not to exceed fourty eight (48) hours.
2.9 Assist OWNER in preparation of project close-out and final inspection report including
verification of completion on the final punch list items.
TASK 3 ~ Record Drawings
The purpose of this task is to provide record drawings representative of the "As Constructed"
project. Three (3) paper copies of "Half-Size" (11" x 17") Record Drawings shall be furnished.
Record drawings shall also be provided to the City in electronic format on CD-ROM.
TIME OF COMPLETION
The proposed engineering services shall coincide with construction of the Project. It is anticipated
that construction will proceed over an approximate 9 month schedule from January, 2003 through
September, 2003. Actual construction time and scheduling will need to be adjusted according to the
CONTRACTOR's actual schedule for completing the work. Record drawings will be completed
following the construction period.
-2-
COMPENSATION
The not-to-exceed limit for engineering fees for the work described above is $74,814. A breakdown
of the estimated engineering hours and other costs is presented in Exhibit A. The estimate assumes
a 9 month construction schedule. The ENGINEER will invoice for this monthly on an hourly rate
basis in accordance with ENGINEER's standard fee schedule in effect at the time the work is
completed. A copy of ENGINEER's current fee schedule is attached for reference. Outside services
for subconsultant work and other direct costs shall be reimbu rsed at cost plus 10 percent mark-up.
Travel and subsistence will be charged at cost. The ENGINEER shall not exceed the amount
defined for the services of this Task Order No.3 without written authorization from the OWNER.
EFFECTIVE DATE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the OWNER and the ENGINEER have
signed in confirmation of this Task Order NO.3 with the effective date this \toth day of
c~a.'I'l.,UQ,\l~ of 2003.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A ~~rp~r:tlo:.~. .
By
Principal
By:
By:
Ia.I'i<
cc A,f,04J-1
(?"'/1f:1/0 2-
-3-
EXHIBIT A
ESTIMATE OF ENGINEERING COSTS
CITY OF MERIDIAN" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION PROJECT
LABOR MANHOURS Direct
arouo ~II 'meers ~u )c{)n~wmms Costs TUTAL
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ... .~
" " '" " ::; (5
00 " " u <::: cil -
c: u . ~
" "- " 0 e " .~ ~~ '"
" c. ':.O-!:: "- '" " ~ 0
,,::;:Q " - 00 c: ~ ] ~ 0 U
~:: c: u " ;;:.
TASK DESCRIPTION 2: ." :.:l", ~ ~':::
.-g ~ ~ - ~ - 2 ~ u u
u ~
u " 0;-;; oii .~ ~ ~ ~ -0
.~ " '" '"
lb a:~ 'll ~iS
u :.:; 1-
"" .. ".'j
0 "C:
~ "
El c
Task t - Field Inspection
1.1 Field Inspector/RE (4 hrs/wk, 6 Months) 16 60 16 40 S 12,636
Task 2 - Contract Administration
2.1 PreconslIuction Meeting(s) 4 4 4 S 1.180
2.2 Weekly Construction Meeting 24 40 32 20 16 $ 13,156
2.3 Submittal/Shop Drawing Review 16 100 24 20 10 70 $ 23,258
2.4-6 Office Engineering (RAs,CO,FO, Payment Requests) 8 40 16 16 $ 8,784
2.7 Stan-Up Services 8 16 8 16 S 4,824
2.8 Substantial Completion & Close-oUl 4 12 6 8 S 2,984
Task 3 - Record Drawinl!s
3.1 Record Drawing Preparation 4 24 8 2 40 8 $ 200 S 7,992
TOTALS 80 296 114 38 40 30 162 $ 200 $ 74,814
Personnel Classification eSN eSII es/IV ESNI erN CIe, I
~$61
$90
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, PC
FEE SCHEDULE
As of March 1, 2002
Boise, Idaho
Engineers/Scientists (E1S)
E/S I
E/S II
E/S III
E/S IV
E/S V
E/S VI
E/S VII
E/S VIII
Principal
Engineering Aides (EA)
EAI
EA If
EAllf
EAIV
EA V
EAVI
EA VII
Engineering Technicians (ET)
ETI
ET II
ET III
ETIV
ETV
ETVl
ETVII
ET VIII
Support Staff
Office Aides
Clerical
Word Processors
Project Equipment Communication Expense
(PECE) Per DL Hour
Travel and Subsistence
Mileage
Subconsultant
Other Direct Costs
This fee schedule is subject to annual revisions due to labor adjustments.
H:\KmaouaI\FEE\Staodard\BOI02.doc
Hourlv Rate
$75.00
87.00
108.00
120.00
131.00
143.00
154.00
169.00
176.00
52.00
59.00
72.00
78.00
86.00
107.00
120.00
58.00
61.00
65.00
69.00
76.00
88.00
100.00
120.00
37.00
55.00
65.00
5.77
at cost
.36/mile
Cost + 10%
Cost + 10%
1
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
In Association with Design and
Construction of 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension
KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
This Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Meridian, Idaho (herein called OWNER)
and Keller Associates, Inc. (herein called CONSULTANT) this llu~ day of January, 2003.
In consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the OWNER and the CONSULTANT agree
as follows:
1. Scope of Services
During the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish to the OWNER, Design
Engineering services as set forth in Section 2 of Attachment A, attached hereto, and made a
part hereof. Such services shall be performed by individuals as employees of CONSULTANT,
an independent Contractor, and not as employees of the OWNER.
2. Period of AQreement
The Agreement shall commence on the first above written date and terminate upon completion
of construction.
3. Payment Rates and Billinq
3.1 As compensation for Design and Construction Engineering Services to be performed by
CONSULTANT, the OWNER will pay CONSULTANT the amount set forth in Section 3 of
Attachment A attached hereto. OWNER shall not have any liability for any other
expenses or costs incurred by CONSULTANT, unless otherwise provided in the
Attachment or authorized by the OWNER.
3.2 CONSULTANT shall keep accurate records of the time expended. Payment for services
performed by CONSULTANT shall be made at the end of each month upon the
submission by CONSULTANT of invoices or time statements to the OWNER.
Invoices submitted by CONSULTANT will:
A. Accurately describe services rendered during the invoice period, including
respective dates of performance and any reports submitted.
B. Identify any other authorized expense incurred hereunder; and
C. Make reference to this Agreement (Keller Associates' project number) or
otherwise identify the invoice in such a manner as the OWNER may reasonably
require.
3.3 The CONSULTANT shall not take any action hereunder which could cause the amount
for which OWNER would be obligated to CONSULTANT to exceed the sum of the fees
102068/1/03-005 Page 1
defined in the Attachment provided, however, that this sum may be increased or
decreased from time to time by the OWNER in writing if extra work is required or the
scope of work is adjusted for any reason. For other than lump sum (fixed fee)
agreements, CONSULTANT shall advise the OWNER in writing when costs incurred
under this Agreement are equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the aforesaid sum.
4. Data
CONSULTANT agrees that all data and information such as designs, drawings, reports,
blueprints, and the like generated in the performance of this Agreement and data and
information which are specific to be delivered or which are, in fact, delivered pursuant to this
Agreement shall be and remain the sole property of OWNER. CONSULTANT shall deliver all
data and information to the OWNER upon OWNER's request, and shall be fully responsible for
the care and protection thereof until such delivery. Except as otherwise provided in this
Agreement, said documents shall be delivered to OWNER without additional costs to OWNER.
5. Termination
The OWNER and CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part at any time
be giving 30 days written notice thereof. Upon said termination, CONSULTANT will be
reimbursed for that portion of the work satisfactorily completed prior to termination and shall be
entitled to reasonable damages.
6. Chanaes
The OWNER, within the general scope of this Agreement, may at any time, by written notice to
CONSULTANT, issue additional instructions, require additional services, or direct the omission
of services covered by this Agreement. In such event, there will be made an equitable
adjustment in price and time of performance, but any claim by either party for such an
adjustment must be made within thirty (30) days of the receipt of said written notice.
7. Compliance with Laws
To the extent applicable hereto, CONSULTANT shall in the performance of this Agreement
comply with all Federal, State, and local Jaws, all regulations and orders issued under any
applicable law, and all State regulations.
8. Standards
All services hereunder shall be performed by employees or agents of CONSULTANT who are
experienced and highly skilled in their professions and in accordance with the standards of
workmanship in their professions. CONSULTANT warrants that its findings, recommendations,
and professional advice shall be based on practices and procedures customarily used in its
profession and asserts it will employ the current state-of-the-art and accepted standard industry
practice in performing the services defined herein.
102068/1/03-005
Page 2
9. Records
The OWNER and, if the services are to be performed hereunder relate to a Federal or State
Government Contract, the Comptroller General of the United States, and the Department or
Agency of the Government having cognizance over said prime Contract, and any of their duly
authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of 3 years after final payment under this
Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents,
papers, and records of CONSULTANT involving transactions related to this Agreement.
10. Gratuities
CONSULTANT warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has
offered or given any gratuities to OWNER's employees, agents, or representatives with a view
toward securing this Agreement or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
11. Insurance
CONSULTANT shall provide professional liability indemnification to protect the OWNER and
granting agencies from CONSULTANT's negligent acts and errors of omission of a professional
nature.
12. Owner Furnished Services
The following services would be provided by the OWNER in completion of this project:
a. Provide access to relevant record drawings, master plans, county GIS mapping, base
mapping with contours in AutoCAD and other relevant information of record.
b. Execute and pay for all necessary right-of-way or easements for construction. Provide
assistance and review during the appraisal and negotiation process.
c. Provide horizontal and vertical datum information.
d. Provide fulltime inspection services and all other services not included in Keller
Associates Scope of Work unless additional services are requested of Keller Associates
by the City at an increase in cost.
102068/1/03-005 Page 3
In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
CLIENT: CITY OF MERIDIAN
BY:~~
, obert D. Corrie
Title: Mayor
By'
Title: Cit Clerk
~
.::
-
-
-
Approved By City Co~cil: .".~ & 2
-;'~Gu.s ,Qi 0 ...
/ I ~ ~ r 1S't . ~.$
Date: I:l. 10 0 ~~<> ~ C 'f)~ ....$'
<<f 'I. f}t ....POr<J ...'
'1/ -Vnl t l' \"
JIll \\\\
Jinw IHU\\
102068/1/03-005
Page 4
CONSULTANT: KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
By Rfdun~,k~------
Title: Principal
By:
Title: Proiect Manaaer
January 9, 2003
A TT ACHMENT "A"
AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
For the
2003 TOUCHMARK CROSSING WATER MAIN EXTENSION
SECTION 1
Owner Information and Resoonsibilities:
The following data and/or services are to be provided by the OWNER without cost to the
CONSULTANT.
A. Provide ongoing review of the CONSULTANT work and timely consideration of policy issues at
a time acceptable to both the OWNER and CONSULTANT.
B. Provide access to relevant record drawings, master plans, county GIS mapping, base mapping
with contours in AutoCAD, and other relevant information of record.
C. Execute and pay for all necessary right-of-way or easements for construction. Provide assistance
and review during the easement acquisition process.
D. Request, pay for, and provide necessary title reports to CONSULTANT (2 title reports are
anticipated).
E. Construction staking.
F. Provide pipe sizes for water main size(s). The proposed water main construction will consist of
approximately 810 If of 12-inch main, and 2,805 If of 16-inch main, of which 225 feet will be
bored beneath Interstate 84.
G. Review and execute any necessary agency developed agreements with the owner of
irrigation/drainage facilities, if needed.
H. Review and execute necessary agency developed agreements related to utility crossing of ACHD
and ITD controlled right-of-way. CONSULTANT will provide work related to legal descriptions,
mapping, and the Right-of Way Encroachment Application and Permit for Utilities.
1. OWNER will provide CONSULTANT with aerial photographs, 2-foot contour mapping, and
GIS Mapping for the project area. CONSULTANT intends to use the 2-foot contour mapping
supplemented by surveyed topographic information for the project design.
02074/02-555
-1-
Attachment "An
January 9, 2003
SECTION 2
Preliminary Alignment Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.1 Proiect Updates
Throughout the length of the project, the CONSULTANT will submit a monthly progress report
that includes a current invoice, a description of the completed tasks, estimate of percent
completion, and other relevant information related to the project schedule.
2.2 Aerial Photos
OWNER will provide to CONSULTANT.
2.3 Spot Elevation Survey
Perform spot elevation survey within project area generally bounded by Eagle Road, Overland'
Road, the southerly line of St. Luke's Meridian, and the southwesterly line of the Touchmark
Development. The intent of this survey is to supplement the contour mapping provided by the
OWNER and to confirm elevations that may be needed in the Preliminary Alignment Analyses.
This work does not include a full topographic survey.
2.4 Review Preliminary Alignment
Using GIS mapping provided by the OWNER, existing contour mapping, spot elevation data,
and findings from the Preliminary Site Survey and utility investigation, review the preliminary
horizontal alignment for the main. Vertical profiles will not be developed at this time, except at
boring and crossing locations. Boring will be required for the north south main extension across
1-84 (approximately 225 feet). There will be one significant crossing to design and construct at
Five Mile Creek, just downstream of the confluence of Eight Mile and Five Mile Creeks. Meet
with OWNER to review concept and get concurrence. CONSULTANT will initiate coordination
with ITD, ACHD, and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District regarding alignment within the State
right-of-way and the proposed boring and crossing.
2.5 Initial Property Owner Contacts
Make initial contact with property owners to review preliminary alignment and request donation
of easement to the OWNER. Seek input, comments, and concerns from property owners. Have
property owners sign a permission letter to access property. Document results. It is anticipated
that permanent easements will be required from S1. Luke's Meridian, and the Touchmark
Development. In addition, depending on the horizontal alignment, a temporary construction
easement maybe required from the Idaho Elks Rehab Foundation to provide sufficient space for
boring operations.
2.6 City of Meridian Review
Meet with the OWNER to review the findings of the preliminary alignment review and property
owner contacts. Make decisions regarding changes related to the preliminary aligmnent.
2.7 Revise Preliminary Alignment
Revise the preliminary horizontal alignment.
02074/02-555
-2-
Attachment "A"
January 9, 2003
2.8 Second Property Owner Contacts
Make second contacts with property owners to review the revised alignment. Seek input,
comments, and concerns. Document results to OWNER and property owners.
2.9 Agency Coordination (ITD. ACHD. Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District)
Coordinate with ITD, ACHD, Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, and utility companies. Write
a letter to confirm findings and initiate the process to develop a crossing agreement with Nampa-
Meridian Irrigation District Prepare draft of the Right-of-Way Encroachment Application and
Permit for Utilities for submission to lTD. The OWNER will review and execute any necessary
agency agreements.
2.11 Select Alignment
Compile property owner comments and meet with the OWNER to review project status. Make
selection of preferred alignment and issue a notice to proceed with other design tasks.
Easement Acquisition Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The anticipated scope involves work related to three (3) parcels. It is anticipated that the majority of the
alignment will be located within existing ITD and ACHD right-of-way, and that easement acquisition
will only be required form St. Luke's Meridian and Touchmark Development. CONSULTANT
anticipates that three contacts will be required for each property owner to obtain the necessary easements
for the project. The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.12 Title Reports
Title Reports will be reviewed for the St. Luke's Meridian Parcel and the Touchmark
Development. OWNER will request, pay for, and provide CONSULTANT with the necessary
title reports (two reports are anticipated).
2.13 Parcel Map
Develop a parcel base map showing parcel boundaries and right-of-way for the project.
Incorporate design work developed as part of the Design Section of this scope.
2.14 Legal Descriptions & Maps
Using City standards, write metes and bounds legal descriptions for the permanent easements
(two are anticipated). Develop a map in AutoCAD to serve as an attachment to the legal
descriptions.
2.15 Appraisals
We do not anticipate the need for appraisals and have not included them in our fee. However, if
St. Luke's or Touchmark are unwilling to donate easements, appraisals may be necessary to
establish fair market value of the easements for payment by the OWNER.
2.16 Easement Contract Forms
Complete an easement form for each parcel. Include special conditions or requirements of the
contract and attach legal description and map. Submit package to OWNER. OWNER will
proceed with execution of the contract, make payments, and execution and recording of the
formal "Grant of Easement".
02074/02-555
-3-
Attachment "AU
January 9, 2003
Environmental Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
It is anticipated that work related to the project will be within a developed, previously disturbed right-of-
way corridor. Thus, CONSULTANT does not anticipate, and has not included, environmental services
within this Scope of Services. Such environmental services include work related to wetlands (404
permitting), cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, or flood plain modeling.
Desien Services to be Performed by the CONSULT ANT:
The CONSULTANT shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.17 Pre-Design Meeting
A Pre-Design Meeting/Scoping Session has already occurred with the City of Meridian.
Schematic preliminary alignment alternatives and items to be provided to CONSULTANT by the
OWNER were identified (GIS and aerial mapping). To simplify the process and minimize
expense, we do not feel that an additional Pre-Design Meeting is necessary.
2.18 Utility Research
The CONSULTANT shall contact and receive utility information from affected utilities
including, but not limited to, gas, power, telephone, storm drainage, cable T.V., irrigation, and
other utilities which may be affected by the proposed construction. The CONSULTANT will use
"Dig-Line" to verify utility line locations. Actual field pot-holing may be necessary at specific
crossing locations depending on proximity to the project, and the level of as~built detail
available. We are aware that fiber optic cable was recently installed along the northerly line of
the 1-84 corridor and would likely be a candidate for pot-holing activities. We estimate that a
minimum of six pothole locations will be required for the project. We have not included pot-
holing services within this Scope of Services. Rather, with CONSULTANT direction, OWNER
will provide pot-holing services at OWNER's expense.
2.19 Final Agency Coordination
Finalize work related to the ITD right-of-way encroachment application and permit for utilities.
Facilitate finalization of Five Mile Creek crossing agreement through Nampa-Meridian Irrigation
District. Coordinate with ACHD and obtain plan approva1. Coordinate with other miscellaneous
utilities.
2.20 Design
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing the design in conformance with local
agencies' policies including ACHD, ITD, and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, and shall be
responsible for consideration of traffic access, pipeline alignments and grades at boring and
crossing locations, and other items necessary for proper construction of the project. A crossing
agreement will be required between Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian
for the Five Mile Creek crossing. CONSULTANT will coordinate with Nampa-Meridian and
their attorney to ultimately secure the crossing agreement. The OWNER will pay Ringert-Clark
Chartered Lawyers directly for legal expenses related to drafting and executing the crossing
agreement.
02074/02-555
-4-
Attachment "AU
January 9, 2003
2.21 Pipe Analvsis
The CONSULTANT will not be performing pipe analysis. Rather, the OWNER has identified
that the project will include approximately 810 If of 12-inch main, and 2,805 If of 16-inch main,
of which 225 feet will be bored beneath Interstate 84.
2.22 Note Reduction, Mapping & Design Drafting
The CONSULTANT shall perform topographical survey data mapping and design drafting in an
AutoCAD format Version 2000. The scale of the full size drawings (22" x 34") shall be 1" =
20'H and 1"=2'V and shall include Meridian City standard notes, vicinity maps, sheet indexes,
north arrows, and bar scales. The design drawing shall utilize the ISPWC standard symbols and
shall identifY pipe size and type, pipe slope, invert elevations, surface repair required, adjacent
property addresses, property lines, right-of-way, street names, elevation benchmarks, survey
control, topographic features, utilities, and any special details necessary for a high quality,
bidable project. The drafting shall be performed on 22" x 34" vellum. CONSULTANT will
provide reduced scale drawings (1 "=40'H and 1 "=4' V) for bidding purposes.
2.23 Specifications and Contract Documents
Specifications and Contract Documents shall be in accordance with City of Meridian Standard
Details and Specifications, and the current edition of the Idaho Standard Public Works
Construction (ISPWC). The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing plans and
specifications for bidding and bid document packages (20 packages total).
2.24 Plan Review
Upon 75% completion of the plans and specifications, the CONSULTANT shall submit review
sets of plans to all affected utilities, ITD, ACHD, DEQ, and three sets for the OWNER's review
and comments.
2.25 Revisions
The CONSULTANT shall incorporate all revisions as suggested by the OWNER and other
agencies in the final set of plans and specifications.
2.26 Deliverables to the OWNER
Deliverables shall include 20 bid packages that will contain specifications and reduced scale
project plans.
2.27 Opinion of Probable Cost
The CONSULTANT shall prepare an opinion of probable construction costs at two different
times during the project. Near the conclusion of preliminary design an opinion of probable cost
will be developed for each alternative alignment under consideration in the preliminary design
process. These estimates will be presented to the OWNER during the final selection alignment
meeting. These preliminary opinions of probable cost will include probable cost estimates only
for any alignments still under consideration at the time. The opinion of probable cost for the
final selected pipeline alignment will be updated to include easement acquisition (if required). A
final design opinion of probable cost will also be prepared that will include all land acquisition,
easement, and water main construction costs. This final design opinion of probable cost will be
modified during the bidding process to include just an opinion of probable construction cost
which will be used for evaluating the contractor bids.
02074/02-555
-5-
Attachment "A"
January 9, 2003
Construction Assistance Services to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
Items 2.28 through 2.34 will be performed by the CONSULTANT on an hourly rate basis if requested by
the OWNER.
2.28 Pre-Bid, Bid and Award
The CONSULTANT shall attend pre-bid meeting and walk-through, and answer all technical
questions referred to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER relating to the project during the bid
and award process.
2.29 Addenda
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULTANT shall prepare addenda as necessary during
the bid process to clarify bidding requirements. The OWNER will distribute addenda as
required.
2.30 Pre-Construction Conference
The CONSULTANT shall attend a pre-construction conference for this project. The OWNER
shall make all ofthe necessary arrangements for time, date, and place.
2.31 Construction Review
The CONSULTANT shall be available for construction review and technical consultation as
requested by the OWNER while the project is being constructed. Attend bi-weekly review
meetings for project cost, schedules, problems, and tour project site. This work is based on a
forty five (45) calendar day construction period.
2.32 Shop Drawing Review
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for any necessary
shop drawing reviews for the project.
2.33 Change Orders
When requested by the OWNER, the CONSULTANT shall participate in the negotiation and
preparation for any necessary change orders for the project.
2.34 Record Drawings
The CONSULTANT shall prepare final record drawings documenting all manhole locations,
elevations of manhole rings and inverts, and any other documented plan changes that were made
during the construction process.
Topoeraphic and Desil!D Survey to be Performed by the CONSULTANT:
The Consultant shall furnish services specifically limited to the following:
2.35 Monument Replacement
The CONSULTANT shall reference on the map and tie down the location of all found
monuments. If monuments are disturbed during construction, the CONSULT ANT shall replace
said monuments to their referenced position.
02074/02-555
-6-
Attachment "A"
January 9, 2003
2.36 Monument. Record Map. and Benchmark Research
The CONSULTANT shall research the Ada County Surveyor's records for survey monuments
for the purpose of horizontal control for the project. The CONSULTANT will locate in the field
monuments of record which may be disrupted as a part of the construction. The CONSULTANT
shall reference these monuments on the Construction Plans provided to the OWNER. The
vertical datum shall be the NA VD 88 Datum.
2.37 Topographic Survey
The CONSULTANT shall perform a topographic survey along the preferred and selected
alignment; generally north of Overland Road, and east of Eagle Road, and south of S1. Luke's
Meridian. The survey shall locate all relevant features necessary for a proper design of the
project. As a minimum, all items that are not accurately reflected on the GIS mapping provided
by the OWNER shall be surveyed within 25 feet of the proposed alignment. These items shall
include detailed information to develop a cross section across 1-84, pertinent information at the
Five Mile creek crossing, wells, streets, outlines of buildings, significant vegetation, sidewalks,
driveways, utilities, building finish floor elevations, ditches, drainage ways, trees, centerline
elevations, and shall also include a search for monuments of record and a physical survey of
monuments that are found. We anticipate that many of the surface features listed above will be
accurately depicted on the project aerial photograph and will not require topographic survey.
2.38 Construction Survey Control
The CONSULTANT shall set temporary benchmarks (TBMs) and horizontal control points at
500 feet intervals along the alignment of the project. TBMs and horizontal control points shall
be delineated on the final Construction Plans provided to the OWNER.
Proiect Schedule for the CONSULTANT:
2.39 Schedule
The project schedule is based on construction ending 4/17/03. This schedule is contingent upon
the success of acquiring easements, successful coordination with lTD, timely reviews by the
OWNER, ACHD, DEQ, lTD, and utilities. If at any time during project performance the
CONSULTANT expects difficulty in meeting the schedule, the CONSULTANT must notify the
OWNER in writing regarding anticipated schedule delays and specific tasks that are causing the
delays. The CONSULTANT and OWNER shall meet to discuss overall project impacts,
negotiate contract schedule extensions, and determine the proper course of action.
. Start Date
. 75% Review Plans
. Pinal Plans
. Advertise Project
. Open Bids
. Award Bid
. Begin Construction
. End Construction
02074/02-555
12/09/02
0I/20/03
02/03/03
02/06/03
02/20/03
02/27/03
03/03/03
04/17/03
-7-
Attachment "A"
January 9, 2003
NOTE: ACHD plans on beginning construction for the Overland Road I Eagle Road
Intersection Project on March 15, 2003. The above schedule would start the City's contractor
approximately two weeks prior to ACHD's contractor. This should be sufficient time for the
City's contractor to connect into the existing water main near the intersection of Overland Road
and Eagle Road and construct the water main beyond the limits of the ACHD project.
02074/02.555
-8-
Attachment "A"
January 9, 2003
SECTION 3
Basis of Fee and Billing Schedule:
The OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for its services and reimbursable expenses as follows:
Preliminary Alignment and Design Services
Items 2.1 through 2.11, and Items 2.17 through 2.27 for a lump sum fee of$17,800.00
Topographic and Design Survey
Item 2.35 through 2.38, on a lump sum basis of$1,900.00
Easement Acquisition Services
Items 2.12 through 2.16, on a time and materials basis estimated at $2,500.00
Construction Assistance Services
Items 2.28 through 2.34, on a time and materials basis estimated at $2,600.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONTRACT AMOUNT: $24,800.00
For all services to be paid by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT for work completed on a time and
materials basis, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for each hour each assigned employee works on the
project in accordance with the attached Title Code Billing Rate schedule. The Title Code Billing Rates
attached include all costs for direct labor, indirect labor, travel costs within the Meridian area, vehicles,
surveying equipment, computer hardware and software, and markup for profit. These Title Code Billing
Rates shall remain in place during the course of the project unless billing rate changes are specifically
approved in writing by the OWNER.
All reimbursable expenses shall be paid at the direct reimbursable expense cost times a multiplier of 1.0.
Reimbursable expenses shall include subconsultants, travel outside of the Meridian area, equipment
rental costs, plan and specification reproduction costs over and above 20 sets of plans and specifications,
and any charges required from aerial companies or the county or city in association with obtaining
survey control and/or GIS data.
02074/02-555
-9-
Attachment "A"
KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
TITLE CODE BILLING RATES
Personnel Hourly Rate
Principal: Jim Keller, P.E. $118.00
Project Managers: Rod Linja, P.E. $115.00
Dennis Suihkonen, P.E. $115.00
Susan Burnham, P .E. $102.00
Chief Engineer: David Kinzer, P.E. $115.00
Project Engineers: Donn Carnahan, P.E. $85.00
Jim Mullen, P .E. $85.00
Ryan Adelman, P .E. $75.00
Bryan Phinney, P.E. $75.00
Mike Anderson, E.I.T. $64.00
James Bledsoe, E.I.T. $67.00
Ross Erickson, E.I.T. $67.00
Mike Jaglowski, E.I.T. $69.00
Grant Sanders, E.I.T. $64.00
Marla Vik, E.I.T. $64.00
Hailey Wappett, E.I.T. $60.00
Designers: Ian Crane $54.00
Alan Jones $54.00
Jeny Thornton $54.00
Tee hnicianslInspection $48.00
Drafting $45.00
Clerical $40.00
Two-Man Survey Crew $100.00
Mileage Cost $O.32/mile
02074/02-555
-10-
January 9, 2003
Attachment "A"
M
RECEIVED
c:'::c - 5 2002
To: Brad Watson /J /} (l
From: Lenard Grady p" ~
CC: Gary Smith
Date: 10/17/2002
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for December 10, 2002 City Council Meeting
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
December 10 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension - Professional Services Contract.
Attached is an agreement for professional services with Keller Associates for design,
easement acquisition services, and limited construction services for a total of $24,800. Once
complete, the water pipe will provide another waterline crossing under 1-84, which will
significantly improve water distribution. This will result in improved fire flows and better pump
utilization.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the contract with Keller Associates for professional
services on the 2003 T ouchmark Crossing Water Main Extension for $24,800
and authorize the Mayor to sign it
~
Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Proiect - Construction Services Contract. Attached is an
agreement for professional services totaling $74,800 with Carollo Engineers for construction
selVices. They have completed the design and bid documents
and the project is currently bidding. The construction costs is
estimated to be over $900,000.
From the desk of:..
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works
Department recommends that City Council approve
the contract with Carollo Engineers for construction
uo.ardGrady
Staff Engineer
Meridian Public Worlcs JJepartmcm
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
(208) 898-5500
Fax; (208) 887- 1297
gradyl@ci.meridianid.us
. Page 1
. (
services on the Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project for $74,800 and
authorize the Mayor to sign it
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 2
TASK ORDER NO.3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS (OWNER)
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS; A Professional Corporation (ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by the ENGINEER pursuant to the mutual
promises, covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement between the above named parties
dated the 18th of August, 2001 in connection with:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION THICKENER PROJECT
PURPOSE
The ENGINEER's scope of services, time of completion and compensation shall be as set forth
herein. Services shall generally be described as Construction Management Services for the City of
Meridian, Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project.
ENGINEER's SERVICES
TASK 1 . Field Inspection Services
The ENGINEER shall provide a Part-Time Resident Project Engineer to perform the following tasks:
1.1 Provide on-site inspection of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Field
inspection is budgeted for 6 hours per week assuming inspections will be conducted for 6
months of the 9 month contract time in the project documents. It is understood that the City
will provide personnel for field inspection and communication with the contractor for the times
when the ENGINEER is not on-site.
1.2 Direct materials testing for soils compaction and concrete slump and compressive strength in
accordance with the Contract Documents. Soils testing laboratory services and concrete
field quality control testing will be provided by the CONTRACTOR.
1.3 Keep a daily written log of construction activities observed at the site on the days of part-time
inspection. Copies of the daily log will be sent to the OWNER and kept by the ENGINEER.
1.4 Issue and document field orders in writing per the Contract Documents. Submit copies to
OWNER.
1.5 Take photographs of construction in progress during each phase of the work. Compile and
maintain photograph prints as a history of the project. Duplicate copies, appropriately labeled,
shall be submitted periodically to the OWNER, suitable for placing in standard three-ring
binders.
TASK 2 - Contract Administration Services
The purpose of this task is to provide office and field support engineering services during
construction of the project. The ENGINEER will provide specialty inspection services at selected
stages for structural/architectural, mechanical, and electricallinstrumentation. Specific support
services to be provided by the ENGINEER during construction include the following:
2.1 Attend and conduct preconstruction meeting.
2.2 Attend weekly construction meetings, assumed to be no longer than one hour duration.
2.3 Review CONTRACTOR's submittals and shop drawings for conformance with the Contract
Documents. The labor estimate is based on review of submittals required in the project documents
for seventy (70) civil, structural and mechanical sections, at an average review time of 2 hours per
section. Electrical submittals will be reviewed by Subconsultant.
2.4 Assist the OWNER with technical responses to CONTRACTOR's request for information
(RFls), and questions from the field, and other CONTRACTOR requests.
2.5 Evaluate and prepare Change Order requests, if required.
2.6 Review CONTRACTOR's monthly payment requests and progress reports and provide
recommendations to the OWNER for progress payments.
2.7 Assist OWNER with the evaluation of the project at Substantial Completion, and provide the
punch list of items for completion with recommendation for progress payment.
2.8 Provide assistance during start-up and during the OWNER's initial operation of new and
modified facilities. Budget for this item is not to exceed fourty eight (48) hours.
2.9 Assist OWNER in preparation of project close-out and final inspection report including
verification of completion on the final punch list items.
TASK 3 ~ Record Drawings
The purpose of this task is to provide record drawings representative of the "As Constructed" project.
Three (3) paper copies of "Half-Size" (11" x 17") Record Drawings shall be furnished. Record
drawings shall also be provided to the City in electronic format on CD-ROM.
TIME OF COMPLETION
The proposed engineering services shall coincide with construction of the Project. It is anticipated
that construction will proceed over an approximate 9 month schedule from January, 2003 through
September, 2003. Actual construction time and scheduling will need to be adjusted according to the
CONTRACTOR's actual schedule for completing the work. Record drawings will be completed
following the construction period.
COMPENSA liON
The not-to-exceed limit for engineering fees for the work described above is $74,800. A breakdown
of the estimated engineering hours and other costs is presented in Exhibit A. The estimate assumes
a 9 month construction schedule. The ENGINEER will invoiceforthis monthlyon an hourly rate basis
in accordance with ENGINEER's standard fee schedule in effect at the time the work is completed.
A copy of ENGINEER's current fee schedule is attached for reference. Outside services for
subconsultant work and other direct costs shall be reimbursed at cost plus 10 percent mark-up.
Travel and subsistence will be charged at cost. The ENGINEER shall not exceed the amount
defined for the services of this Task Order NO.3 without written authorization from the OWNER.
EFFECTIVE DATE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the OWNER and the ENGINEER have
signed in confirmation of this Task Order No. 3 with the effective date this day of
of 2002.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A Professional Corporation
By:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC WORKS
(OWNER)
By:
Principal
By:
Principal
(
I
EXHIBIT A
ESTIMATE OF ENGINEERING COSTS
CITY OF MERIDIAN - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION PROJECT
LABOR MANHOURS Direct
Carollo Engineers Subconsultants Costs TOTAL
~
" w
.. .s
" "
w w w l;; '00
.. " " '" 0
" >> <::: ...
~8. ,a~ " 0 ] ~ 3 l.lJ ~~ ~ ~
:'ij ,s. '" 3 '~5 }j :s 1l .,
TASK DESCRIPTION ~~ l.lJ:r: g ,- C)
- 1:: l.lJ~ ii ~ ~ "0 03
II E II " w _ ... '" ...
'2 iii e. ... " ,!::l -
.0' -- .= a '" '" ~ ~
Il::t-> ~'" " ~ ",,0
'" .~ 'jii
"
0
ii1
Task 1 - Field Insoection
U Field InspectorlRE (4 hrs/wk, 6 Months) 16 60 16 40 $ 12,636
Task 2 - Contract Administration
2.1 Preconstruction Meeling(s) 4 4 4 $ 1,]80
2.2 Weekly Construction Meeting 24 40 32 20 16 $ 13,156
2.3 Submittal/Shop Drawing Rcvicw 16 100 24 20 10 70 $ 23,258
2.4-6 Office Engineering (RFls,CO,FO, Payment Requests) 8 40 16 16 $ 8,784
2.7 Start-Up Services 8 16 8 16 $ 4,824
2.8 Substantial Completion & Close-out 4 ]2 6 8 $ 2,984
Task 3 - Record Drawines
3.1 Record Dmwing Preparation 4 24 8 2 40 8 $ 200 $ 7,992
TOTALS 80 296 114 38 40 30 162 $ 200 $ 74,814
Personnel Classification ESIV EM Esnv ESIVI ErN CI.r i>....... ........ >...........i.......................
i $1371 $81 I $124 I $1541 $82 I $61 $90
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C 12/10/02
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF JOINT SCHOOL )
DISTRICT NO.2 FOR APPROVAL )
OF FINAL PLAT FOR EDUCATION )
CAMPUS SUBDIVISION, )
LOCATED EAST OF NORTH )
LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND )
NORTH OF EAST USTICK ROAD, )
MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
)
CASE NO. FP-02-026
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code 9 12-3-7 on December 10, 2002, and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as
stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from David McKinnon Planner II of the Planning and
Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician m, listing 7 General
Requirements and 11 Site Specific Comments/Final Plat, which are herein found fair and
reasonable, and that Brad Hawkins-Clark, Interim Director for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Daren Fluke, commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the
requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "EDUCATION CAMPUS SUBDIVISIONIi as evidenced in Plat
bearing: "PLAT SHOWING EDUCATION CAMPUS SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF THE
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
1
NORTH 12) OF THE SW ~) SECTION 32) TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE
MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN) ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2002, HERITAGE SUBDIVISION NO.2
BOOK 23 PAGE 1452, 11850FPl, 10/25/02 AND A HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10-29-02,
SHEET 1 OF 2, JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 - DEVELOPER) J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC.
-ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS", Joint School District No.2, Developer, is
Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the
Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician ill,
and David McKinnon Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated December 5, 2002,
listing 7 General Requirements and 11 Site Specific CommentslFinal Plat, a true and correct
copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 4 pages, and by this
reference incorporated herein, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council
taken at their December 10, 2002 meeting as follows, to-wit:
1.1 The Meridian Fire Department requires the following:
1. That a fire flow consistent with Appendix ill-A ofthe Uniform
Fire Code be provided to service the entire proj ect. Fire hydrants
shall be placed an average of 400' apart.
2. Operational fire hydrants are required before combustible
construction begins.
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the
Meridian Water Department.
4. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the
Meridian Fire Department submitted thru the Public Works
Department
5. All radii for internal and external roads shall be 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
2
6. A 20' wide fire lane shall be provided around the proposed
Elementary School.
7. A fire station is scheduled to become operational in the fall of 2003
in this service area.
8. The Meridian CitylRural Fire Department would like to enter into
discussions about establishing a partnership to provide a site for a
public safety education center. If feasible, a site would be
identified East of Phase 2A to locate a manufactured home which
would be used to instruct school age children on home fire safety
procedures.
9. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed
as the result ofthe development of this project are equipped with
Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and
emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation
is to be borne by the developer.
10. An approved temporary turn-around shall be provided at the East
end ofE. Leigh Field Drive. The turn-around could be
accomplished by using the future street intersection intended to
serve the future Hollister Subdivision. This Tee intersection lies
about 300 feet west ofthe dead-end ofE. Leigh Field Drive on the
south side. The turn-around shall be constructed with 28' foot
radii. It shall be required to be 60' long as measured from the main
road centerline in all directions. A road barricade shall be required
to be placed 150' East of the Tee, instead of at the end ofthe
improved street.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City
Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be
signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
3
guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on December 10, 2002.
BY~
ROBER D. CORRIE
Mayor, City of Meridian
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department,
and City Attorney.
By:J!dL ~~, 9-
City Clerk
\\\lllll11lJr/f,
\\\\ f h 11'- 1,,/
\" _I 0 lIFH::;C,,,,,, 11/"
\' ,,(..... '/i<.}. "
,... \.... / ," ,".
... 0' "'~j-,~ ....J.
~ 0"'1='0,0., "'., "':'",/-
~ G'fl. t/': .'c,-::
IZ- ~2o--tl2- f ~ '"
Spt:, ';.
Ji..jSe: ",
Dated:
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Education Campus FP02-026\OrderFP.doc
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
4
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-2501
CIIT COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
Keith Bird
Cherie McCandless
William L.M. Nary
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533' FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM:
December 5,2002
To:
Mayor & City Council
bJA
From: David McKinnon, Planner II
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech
~
Re: Education Campus Subdivision
-Final Plat Approval of two (2) building lots and 1 other lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone,
by the Joint School District No.2 (File No. FP-02-026).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified
or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Joint School District No.2, have requested final plat approval of their 3 lot
subdivision located on the east side ofN. Locust Grove, approximately 12 of a mile north of Us tick
Road. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat for this subdivision on 11/12/02, and
approved a conditional use permit for multiple buildings on a single lot within the proposed
subdivision on the same night.
The northeastern building lot will house a new elementary school, while the other building lot will
consist of several new school buildings (one existing) and a Fire Department education facility. The
"other" lot is a landscape lot adjacent to Locust Grove.
LOCATION
The property is located on the east side of Locust Grove, north of Ustick Road, in Section 32,
Township 4 North, Range 1 east.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Rural residential land, zoned R-l (Ada County)
South: Summerfield Subdivision, zoned R-4.
East: Rural residentiaIlagriculturalland, zoned RUT (Ada County).
West: Heritage Commons Subdivision, zoned R-4.
FINAL PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT "A"
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services can be made available to the lots within the proposed
subdivision, provided changes as may be required by the Public Works and Building
Departments are made.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting
servIces.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Councilor Commission's
attention.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant is to meet all terms ofthe approved preliminary plat (pP-02-023) and the approved
Conditional Use Permit (CUP-02-035).
2. The applicant has indicated that the pressure irrigation system within this development will
be a private system. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be
supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-
point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection
is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common
areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. A fully operational
EXHIBIT "A
pressurized irrigation system shall be installed for this phase prior to occupancy of any home
or building within this phase of development.
3. The proposed fencing and Lot 1, Block 1 landscaping plans (prepared by the Jensen Belts,
entitled Planting Plan) are approved as submitted. Additional landscaping shall be installed
in accordance with the landscape plan submitted with the approved conditional use permit as
the property develops (i.e. landscaping on the elementary school lot shall be installed prior to
occupancy of the school).
4. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and
road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building
permits. All development improvements, including perimeter fencing and landscaping shall
be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or
cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping (that
associated with Lot 1, Block 1), pressurized irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc.,
prior to signature on the final plat.
5. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing
mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through
this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties.
Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works
Department.
6. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final
plat per Resolution 02-374.
8. All drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is
retained only during 1 DO-year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours.
Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed a 3:1 slope.
9. Revise or Add the following notes to the face of the plat:
(7.) Lot 1 of Block ;;!.l shown hereon is a common lot and...
10. Revise the year of the platting to 2003.
11. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms ofthe approved preliminary plat
and conditional use permit, does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT "A
1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City
Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage
district, or lateral users association (ditch owner's), with written approval or non-approval
submitted to the Public Works Department. Iflateral users association approval can't be
obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final
plat signature
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 . Wells may
be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. Two-hundred-fifty and lOG-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivideris expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final
design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho
Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public
Works Department prior commencing installations.
4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill materiaL
5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifYing that
all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest
established normal groundwater elevation.
6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent.
7. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for thosetreesthathavetobe
removed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat for the Education Campus Subdivision.
EXHIBIT "A
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF GEM PARK II
FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR MESSINA HILLS
SUBDIVISION NO.1, LOCATED
WEST OF SOUTH EAGLE ROAD
AND SOUTH OF EAST VICTORY
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO
C/C 12/10/02
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. FP-02-027
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code 9 12-3-7 on December 10, 2002, and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as
stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from David McKinnon Planner II of the Planning and
Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician ill, listing 7 General
Requirements and 12 Site Specific Comments/Final Plat, which are herein found fair and
reasonable, and that Brad Hawkins-Clark Interim Director ofthe Planning and Zoning
Department, and Kent Brown, commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the
requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "MESSINA HilLS SUBDIVISION NO. 111 as evidenced in Plat
bearing: "PLAT OF MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.1, A PORTION OF THE NE \t4
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
1
IDHAO 2003, #20614 \20614_PLTDWG BKB 11/14/02, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 11/14/02,
SHEET 1 OF 3, GEM PARK II PARTNERSHIP - DEVELOPER, BRIGGS ENGINEERING,
INe. - CONSULTING ENGINEER", Gem Park II Partnership, Developer, is Conditionally
Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the
Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and David
McKinnon Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated December 6, 2002, listing 7
General Requirements and 12 Site Specific Comments/Final Plat, a true and correct copy of
which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages, and by this reference
incorporated herein, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at their
December 10, 2002 meeting as follows, to-wit:
1.1 The Meridian Fire Department requires the following:
1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire flow of 1,000 gallons
per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire
project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart.
2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection shall be by the
Meridian Water Department.
3. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian
Fire Department thru the Public Works Department.
4. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in
length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have a
turn around.
5. All roads shall have a turning radius of28' inside and 48' outside.
6. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of
combustible vegetation per section 1103.2.4 of the Uniform Fire Code.
7. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are
required before combustible construction begins.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
2
8. A minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of
the project, which serves more than 50 homes.
9. Building setbacks shall be per the Building Code for one and two story
construction.
10. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards and
shall have a clear driving surface, available at all times, which is 20'
wide.
1.2 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires the following:
1. The District reserves all comments until the review is complete.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City
Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be
signed only at such time as;
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued
guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on December 10, 2002.
BY:~~
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Mayor, City of Meridian
ByJdL.~~ r
City Clerk
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department,
d C. A \\\llIlIl11I"
an Ity ttomey. \\\\\ Or- ~!!.. /I/I,'{
,,\ _I >\I'C;':!"h II
," ",.{ '"'\ '~V<" //
.::;.' c} '\ <" ;1"'1.4~',
2'" ('Pr.'roR4i';,'V .~.
Dated; /2" 20 -t/ 2- i ~ '0 \
'.
-,
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360M\Messina Hills Sub No. I FP02-027\OrderFP.doc
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
3
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
Keith Bird
Cherie McCandless
William L.M. Nary
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' FAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533' FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM:
December 5, 2002
To:
Mayor & City Council
From: David McKinnon, Planner II
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech
})JA
~
Re: Messina Hills Subdivision No.1
-Final Plat Approval of Sixty (60) Building Lots and Ten (10) Other Lots on 34.44 Acres of
land in an R-4 Zone, by Gem Park II (File No. FP-02-027).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified
or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant(s), Gem Park II, have requested approval of the first phase of Messina Hills
Subdivision, consisting of sixty (60) building lots and Ten (10) other lots on 33.44-acres. The first
phase of this subdivision will have a gross density of 2. 03du/acre. This phase is located on the
south side of Victory Road, approximately 118 of a mile west of Eagle Road. This phase of the
subdivision includes an a Meridian School District elementary school building site (Lot 11, Block
5) and a new City well site (Lot 2, Block 1).
The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat on 8/13/02. This is one ofthe first phases of the
multiple-phase Tuscany Lakes Subdivision.
LOCATION
The property is located on the south side of Victory Road, north ofE. Rome Drive approximately 118
of a mile west of Eagle Road, in Section 29, Township 3 North, Range 1 east.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Rural residential land, zoned RUT (Ada County) and Thousand Springs Subdivision, zoned
R-4.
South: Tuscany Lakes Subdivision, zoned R-4.
East: Rural residential/agricultural land, zoned RUT (Ada County).
West: Rural residentiallagriculturalland, zoned RUT (Ada County).
EXHIBIT "A"
FINAL PLAT FINDINGS AND REOUIREMENTS
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services can be made available to the lots within the proposed
subdivision, provided changes as may be required by the Public Works and Building
Departments are made.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting
services.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Councilor Commission's
attention.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS I FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat (PP-02-006) and the approved
Conditional Use Permit (CUP-02-006).
2. The applicant has indicated that NMID will own the pressure irrigation system within this
development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied
by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is
EXHffiIT "A"
utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common
areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. A fully operational
pressurized irrigation system shall be installed for this phase prior to occupancy of any home
or building within this phase of development.
3. The proposed fencing and landscaping plans (prepared by the Land Group, Inc. entitled LC,
L-l, L-2, and L-3 dated 11/11/02) are approved as submitted.
4. Graphically depict aiD-foot wide public utilities drainage easement on the rear lot lines of
Lots 1-7 of Block 4.
5. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and
road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building
permits. All development improvements, including perimeter fencing and landscaping shall
be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or
cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized
irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat.
6. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing
mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through
this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties.
Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works
Department.
7. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
8. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final
plat per Resolution 02-374.
9. All drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is
retained only during 1 DO-year storm events, and for a period oftime not to exceed 24 hours.
Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed a 3:1 slope.
10. Revise or Add the following notes to the face ofthe plat:
(16.) ... and Lot~ 20 and 21, Block 5 are non-buildable...
.Q..2J Lot 2, Block 1 shall be dedicated to the City of Meridian for a municipal well.
11. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
12. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat
and conditional use permit, does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
EXHIBIT "A"
,.
(
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City
Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage
district, or lateral users association (ditch owner's), with written approval or non-approval
submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be
obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final
plat signature
2. Any existing domestic wells andlor septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may
be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. Two-hundred-fifty and 1 DO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections andlor fire hydrants. Final
design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho
Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public
Works Department prior commencing installations.
4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that
all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest
established normal groundwater elevation.
6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian 's Water Works Superintendent.
7. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches oftrees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that
have to be removed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Messina Hills Subdivision No.1.
EXHIBIT "A"
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION )
OF JONI R. WEST FOR TRANSFER OF )
OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A )
DAY CARE IN AN L-O ZONE FROM JONI R. )
WEST, LOCATED AT 1131 WEST CHERRY )
LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
)
)
)
C/C 12/10/02
CASE NO. TCU-02-001
ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION FOR
TRANSFER OF
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
This matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on December
10, 2002, and Brad Hawkins-Clark, Interim Director for the Planning and Zoning Department,
and the applicant, Joni R. West, appeared and commented at the hearing, and no one appeared in
opposition, and the Council having considered the record of this matter and the testimony
submitted, and the Interim Director for the Planning and Zoning Department stating there was no
objection to the application, and the applicant having no objection to the request IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT:
1. The application is granted subject to the conditions stated herein; and
2. The conditional use permit held by Joni R. West for a daycare at 1131 W. Cherry
Lane, Meridian, Idaho, be transferred to J oni R. West; and
3. The conditional use permit is subject to the following additional conditions:
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JON! R. WEST
PAGEIOF2
1. The transfer of the conditional use permit shall require the applicant to
comply with the requirements ofthe original conditional use permit, which
are on file with the City Clerk's office.
Adopt the Recommendations and/or Requirements of the Meridian Fire
Department as follows:
1. A daycare center is required to pass a fire inspection as outlined by the
State Marshal's office.
2. Meet the requirements of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code & Building Codes.
MY action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I (}.f!:- day of
C ehvM-v , 2002.
~
Mayor Robert D. Corrie
Bydl~k~9
City Clerk
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department
. \\\llll11UII
and CIty Attorney. \\\\\\Of M2,)/"'"
,\,\ ~ 'ilD /.-:~
" <:-- Z<1 ......
$.... 0 O\-\FOR4 h -.z., .~.;.
:: .}.0 (:;0 -;..
~ ~ ~
Dated: /Z-2() -~ 2--t ~
...-~
"-
z:\ Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Jon i Wesl TCU02-00 1 \OrdGrantingCUPTransfer.doc
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JON! R. WEST
PAGE 20F 2
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCil MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
o
K
Tammy de Weerd ~
Cherie McCandless ~
X' Mayor Robert Corrie
,
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2.
Adoption of the Agenda: ~ve..
Sewer Trunk Fee Update: ~tZr Cc.T/v>~(S btLvk f-p r'lw
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for lift Station: f'h.t:ilce h?rU;I-e~ {}7l- UJilL/3/)?cvh.. S"u"6
-/7P ~ ~/-o a?fY"U~
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page I of I
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCil REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
tJ
X
Tammy de Weerd ----K-
Cherie McCandless -L
X Mayor Robert Corrie
.
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: t:vy;n"'~ _
d-dd //.e-r..- J - re Ccm ~a...h~ ~ .P I f<- t!-vm ;;.-viTtir err--
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of November 12,2002 Pre-Council Meeting: ~vt.S!.-
B. Approve minutes of November 26, 2002 City Council Regular
Meeting: q~V'?-
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: PFP
02-003 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 1 building
lot on 3.8491 acres in a C-C zone for Goldstone Center Condo's
by Sundance Company - southeast corner of South Eagle Road
and East Overland Road: ~r-c'V'-L-
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PFP
02-004 Request for Preliminary I Final Plat approval of 3 building
lots on 5.5 acres in a C-G zone for Norco Subdivision by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. - 2150 East Fairview: ~f''''-'
E. Off-site Sewer and Water line Easement, Heritage Commons
(Quenzer Commons) - Eugene and Ardyce Quenzer: df/;Jn:7VV-->
F. Sewer and Water line Easement, Krispy Kreme - Gemtone,
Inc.: a;'tJrtJ v-e-
G. Water line Easement - RoT. Nahas: tfiJPr<>Y'e--
H. Sewer Easement, Baldwin Park SubdiviSion No.1 - Capital
Development: ~v--
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 1 of3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
J: I<(!cc:rm~',_f/\(>.,-..Js /7:rr ;?t7'1.-/~ ;J?'v1-~/vpr htj p~k,f ~
R e.0ie&v{-J1n..- C<,n'.'.J')-'>.tiY/ h-> : ~ VI<..->
I. Agreement for Services for Fire Alarm Maintenance - Audio
Electronics, Inc.: a.rfht9iM../
4. Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department:
1. 2003 Touchmark Crossing Water Main Extension -
Professional Services Contract, Keller Associates: "'7.fJrov>e--
2. Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Project - Construction
Services Contract, Carollo Engineers: V'~1I...e..-
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) - /'l--(7he,.
6. FP 02~026 Request for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots and 1 other
lot on 39.23 acres in an R-4 zone for Education Campus Subdivision by
Joint School District NO.2 - east of North Locust Grove Road and north of
East Ustick Road: a~V'~
7. FP 02~027 Request for Final Plat approval of 60 building lots and 10 other
lots on 34.44 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.1
by Gem Park II - west of South Eagle Road and south of East Victory
Road: t?~~
8. Public Hearing: TeU 02~001 Request for a Transfer of Conditional Use
Permit for a daycare in an L-Q zone for Joni R. West by Joni R. West -
1131 West Cherry Lane: a~7IvjfrejJtl--l.-L -pjP-Iol-f kv dfr~
9. Public Hearing: AZ 02~022 Request for annexation and zoning of
119.83 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC - south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road: a-ffirne'j ft; flJY2jJCV>-e..,c/? ic/'..e 'hn--4:-;:PVVVi'~
10. Public Hearing: PP 02~019 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 328
building lots and 27 other lots on 119.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
proposed Havasu Creek Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East
McMillan Road and west of North Locust Grove Road:
~/-rte~ /-t27 jlYejJdA-<- ...p/~ f' e/e ~ ~t'~
11. Public Hearing: CUP 02-028 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development with 327 single-family dwellings, one
elementary school, and 27 common lots for proposed Havasu Creek
Subdivision by Farwest, LLC -- south of East McMillan Road and west of
North Locust Grove Road: /:. . !f h.rv v&-
t:v;'l-17rn.e.'J -Iv j#Y'elhv-t-e r-:/~.f c a;PplP
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 2 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
12. Public Hearing: AZ 02-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.06
acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision
by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
tt-/fl;17l ej fo / refJ(,t.1/IL -Fi,;:: ./ vl.f' HI.- ~ ~
13. Public Hearing: PP 02-021 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 25
building lots, one existing residence and 8 other lots on 6.06 acres in a
proposed R-8 zone for proposed Mashers Farm Subdivision by CMD,
Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
a#z.rylW'j 1-0 /r~~ /!,c.f c/~ /it- wf'J?V<9v"--<'"
14. Public Hearing: CUP 02-031 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for 25 single-family detached homes and 1
single-family existing home in an R-8 zone for proposed Mashers Farm
Subdivision by CMD, Inc. - 895 North Ten Mile Road:
#~ h r?wo-l. //;::.{ cl-e -ft,"\- 4Pr'"~
Meridian City Council Agcnda - December 10, 2002 Page 3 oD
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of tile City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888.4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
MAYOR
Robert D. COlTie
. .
i .t'f~rJ.:~:;';'
~.,~ "'.cr, ~
clfe;;;b;~~; \.
~< IDAHO /
.;~ /1'
['.. Q..Y
....~rSI.NCr
; 1903
.(
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288.2499 . Fa:>> 288-2501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888.3579 . Fax 898.550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fax 887.1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887.2211 . Fax 887" 1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888.6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2002.
\,\\\ill\lMIII.~IIII/11 Jt
,',\~ Of t::.F1IDI.. 1111;
/"8- ./p?-ro,<<,<-c '11- "\ ~ ,d. /.k.;-, ~ .
= ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK
SEAL -
7. e ~
-::. (....- "'~ 0:;;
... ~Qv. " .::-
~ "1....... 'Sr 1S\ . 'C. ~
.... ~ ~ ~
/~ ':.<10 ,;'V' ......:.."
;"" o~ t.\,~.,j, \......
II"'I~..,,~'.";' ~ ~:,.e.!.\;\\\
fer l,.;.. ~ !;.: ,.c": ~. .
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' Fax (208) 887-4813 . Cily Clerk Oftice Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 288-1193
MAYOR
Robert D. COlTic
"',
.~ Jf~
cM;;;dl~~~~ \,
~ IDAHO l
1~ ..;:Y
('~h- 0
1'~'j$mCE
~ 1903
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288.2499 . Fax 288-250 I
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579 . Fax 898-550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fa.x 887-1297
BUILDrNG DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fa.x 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
WlIIiam L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandlcss
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issues:
... Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2002.
1\1\11111 II Il/[l
II' M'~ III Jt
",,~, of t:.FiID III.!.-
" ~~ '4 '-.-
j:::'a ~cp<pPORA.t(:'o '-'V .-~\ ~ ~ /J?..l-(~'
~ ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888.4433 . Fax (208) 887-4813 . City Clerk Oftlce Fax (208) 888-42 J 8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 288-1 193
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCil MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for lift Station:
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property oftlle City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
(
AS OF DEC 11 '02 0~;38 PAGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
32 12/11 09:38 PUBLIC WORKS
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
UF--S 00'11"001 068 OK
-----------------------------------~---------------------~-~--------------------~-~---------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
2.
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. RolI~call Attendance:
o Tammy de Weerd ~ Bill Nary
=x= Cherie McCandless =::x= Keith Bird
.....Jf.- Mayor Robert Corrie
Adoption of the Agenda: ~v<..
Sewer Trunk Fee Update: ~,z.f- CIfM.~ 6ad<... f-p .plw
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
Blackstone Subdivision f Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursementfor Lift Station: J"'1..Nt;..€. retw1"t. ~ tJ?t,.. C4- d i-U.b/'tJ c.>h.- S"u"b
-/10 ~ ANf-o ~~
Mc,.;tlian City Council ^B""do. - Deoemhe< lO, 2002 P4tt I of!
All m:aeoinl. (lI'.~enttld 4[ puNic mmngs.lh4U become propt:rly of the Cily of MeridiAn.
Anyone desiring accommoWllian (or ili>.nbililics rdntod to do",mClJls nnd/or h.arin~$
plco$c conucnhc City Clerk'. Office ;\1 8Sg.4433 at lenst 48 hours prior 10 the puhli. meeling.
(
** TX CONF]RMAT]ON REPORT ** AS OF DEC 11 '0209'_ PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERID]AN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIWSEC PGS CMDI1 STATUS
20 12/11 138:55 381131613 EC--S 130'25" 001 1368 OK
21 12/11 08:56 12084664405 EC--S 00' 19" 1301 1368 OK
22 12/11 08:57 8841159 EC--S 00'18" 001 068 OK
24 12/11 08:59 2088840744 EC--S 00' 18" 001 068 OK
25 12/11 09:00 2088467366 EC--S 00' 19" 001 068 OK
26 12/11 09:01 208 898 5501 EC--S 00'19" 001 068 OK
27 12/11 09:02 208B886854 EC--S 00'18" 001 068 OK
28 12/11 09:03 8950390 EC--S 00'18" 001 068 OK
29 12/11 09:04 20B 8BB 19B3 G3--S 00'27" 001 068 OK
31 12/11 e9:16 PUBLIC WORKS ----5 ee'00" eee 068 BUSY
THIS DOCUMENT ]5 STILL ]N MEMORY
---------------~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 6:00 p.m.
2.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
o Tammy de Weerd ~ Bill Nary
:K:: Cherie McCandless .....x..:= Keith Bird
-1!L- Mayor Robert Corrie
Adoption of the Agenda: ~v-<..
Sewer Trunk Fee Update: f)~-f- c,n.-..~ 6t<dc... H> ,P / tV
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station: /"h..vce r-r!cz?dre ~ (/?t.. Coz1IUh/'r:>t:'h.. S-u'6
-h> ~ A/v/-o ~~
McridianCityC<>uncil ^8endo.- D<>o<mhorlfl,l002 he>' J oCI
All mow;.t'I"'""l11tod J[ public mr<tines >lI.n booom. prOptrly of lb. Cily ofMoridilUl.
Anyon. ""<irine a<<OllllllOt4t;OlI Corw..bilili.. Tclnlod to oocumcntolUldlor h<llJing'
pleo,. oonl><<1I1. CilyClerl(' Offi~'1 88&-4433 .tl<nst 48 hour> priorlo the p"bli. lll<cling.
~* TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF DEC 09 '02 1~:57 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
25 12/09 15:56 KEITH BIRD
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 00'20" 001 009 OK
------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------~--------
? ~o..se ?o'b-t tbY- rvJt)lA-G no~d~WYtlc.S~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
. City Council Chambers
1. RolI.call Attendance:
_ Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
~ Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station:
Mcridi1m City Counoil Agonda - Docember 10.. 2002 !'age 1 O)f I
All matcnals pral""tlId 21 public m&elillg$ $IWI bcromc pr(lpcrty ofthc Ciry of Meridian.
Anyone &siring lII:commodalion for dis.:..bililid rdllled 10 documenls :mdlOl' hcorings
please eontact the City Clerk's ()ffict at 8&8-<1433 allcast 48 hours prior 10 lb. pubJi<: meeting.
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF DEC 09 '02 1~:S6 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
24 12/09 15:55 KEITH BIRD
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 00'23" 001 008 OK
--~-~----------------------~-------~--------------------------------------------------------
MAYOR
Robert D. COITie
?Le.o..~e. 'Vo'bt tw 'IJu.!o-lic YlOtl&. -lhWl~s!
I
~ C
~;~@
C>W;; CITY OP ~l~~. -' "
,.~-- - ""-
erldicm ;.;. ),
~.ID^HO I
"'.. ,.t.
i>>l~
. n~J
LEGAL DEPART1>-lENT
(20R) 28~-2499 . F~~ 288.250 I
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888.3579 . F"" 21)8-550 I
PUBLlC WORKS
(20S) 898.5500 .I"~~ 887-1297
B U1LOING OePARTMENT
(208J 887-221] . F.1~ 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONINO
(208) 884.5533 . Fox MR-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
T~mm}' deWeel'd
Willi~m r... M. Nary
Chene McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 P,M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this SIll day of December, 2002.
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDrAN, IDAHO 83642
(20S) 8S8-4433. F::ct (208) 887-4813 . Cily Clerk Office F~~ (208) 888-4218 . Human Resoufce~ Fax (2081288-1193
?Le.( !.. CPo~~ JOy i\4~~6 nO-hCb -- TC"'j'1~s!
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
"",
_~ t~
-;''''''""''''"'' '
,'(':'~i("'!:\ '"
~:;"i
":t.tl'
oW;;;;;/;;tie \
I
~ IDAHO J!t
,).. ,y
~~ /
O~<h-
,~q'N'[
: (1903
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-2501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579 . Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887.2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(20B) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2002.
\\\\\\\HIMIII.~rllll'l ~
,."'~~ Of t::.Fi/D4""" ~ A _ ~
.1"0 ot\PORA)'; 1.- ~~ ~ /~r
' _':>..0 <:"0 ' t .
..... ~ ....
I ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK
SEAL
"? &::::
~ <'u ....Q; 0:"'::
~ '7^ USr 1"-'\ ' -<.=- ~
"/ v OJ h..:'::-
",. ~ <<'0,' ,'"
~ -1 a ,"\. "
......11: 0' !~,.,:~r'{ I ,........
11.<11[. c "c -.' , _' ",\\\\
.f:".,;. '.. .._'.j..
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433. Fax (208) 887-48[3 . City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 288-] 193
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF DEC 06 '1212 1b.~S PAGE. 1211
CITY OF MERIDIAN
1212
1121
DATE TiME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS
12/1216 16:48 CHERRY LANE EC--S 121121'28" 1211211
12/1216 16:55 KEITH BIRD ----5 0121'121121" 121121121
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
CMDIl STATUS
1211218 OK
1211218 BUSY
MAYOR
Robc.rl D. Corrie
?11a..<;5.e... CYO~1:: :Jw Vu..b~c n.Otl&.. - ThM1rS!
i
~'i~~
~~ /C1TYOF ~t%_~_ ~ ~
l../Vlerldian u \
~]DAHO J
~.,. /;
v j,lJj::I
. 'aDJ
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288.24')<) . F~x 288-250 I
P.",RKS & RECREATION
(208 B88-3579 . F"", H98-SS0 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(206) 8!18.S500 .F~)( 887.1297
BUll.DING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . F.1X 887.1297
PLANNINQ AND ZONING
(2M) 884-5533 . F~x &88.6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
T~mm)' deWeerd
Wilham L M. Nary
Cherie McCandl ess
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE~COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Coundl Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10. 2002 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Uft Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 61h day of December, 2002.
,\,,\\~\\ 11' I ~}:l li//IJ
,...,..., of M.t::IlID 1111/ ~
" :\0{ ~ -:..
j"& ~c,o"'POFVql'~a 1- \. ~ ~ .6c-..l-'~.
2 ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. ~ CITY CLERK
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' Fax (208) 887.4813 . City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resource~ F~x (2081288-1193
(
i
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF DEC 136 '132 16'47' ,GE.131
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
139 12/136 16:22 381131613 EC--S 013'32" 001 13138 OK
113 12/136 16:23 120846644135 ECnS 00'24" 001 008 OK
11 12/136 16:24 8841159 EC--S 130'24" 001 0138 OK
12 12/136 16:25 20888413744 EC--S 130'23" eel 1308 OK
13 12/136 16:26 2088467366 EC--S 130'24" Bel 1308 OK
14 12/136 16:27 208 898 55131 EC--S 130'23" 1301 0138 OK
15 12/06 16;28 LIBRARY EC--S 130'28" eel 13138 OK
16 12/136 16;30 IDAHO STATESMAN EC--S 130'23" Bel 13138 OK
17 12/136 16'313 2108 388 6924 EC--5 130'27" lOBI 1308 OK
18 12/136 16'31 2088886854 EC--S 1313'23" 13131 13138 OK
19 12/136 16'33 895133913 EC--S 1313'23" 1301 1308 OK
20 12/136 16'34 Laurel EC--S 1313'24" 0131 1308 OK
21 12/136 16:35 2es 387 6393 EC--S 1313'23" 0131 1308 OK
22 12/136 16:35 ADA CTY DEUELMT G3--S 1313'40" 13131 008 OK
23 12/136 16:37 CHERIE MCCANDLES EC--S 1013'28" 13131 008 OK
24 12/136 16:38 POST OFFICE EC--5 1010'33" 001 1308 OK
25 12/06 16:413 2138 BB8 1983 G3--5 1310'313" Bel 13138 OK
26 12/06 16:41 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--5 013'23" 1001 13138 OK
27 12/106 16:42 2108 888 671313 EC--S 013'23" 1001 13138 OK
31 12/106 16:45 PUBLIC WORKS L1F--S 130'14" 001 10138 OK
M^YOR
Robert D. Corrie
?11a..~e. ~O~-\: 1w 'fubL:c Ylo-h&- -1hOJt1~s!
-~~'
"'j~,,~.J,
r-..... ~ /' <:I~ 0" .~l~~ ~ ~~
VYLendzaJ1 14 1,
~JD^~IO /
'1- y
~!:li
_ lU~
LEOAL DEPARTMENT
(2U~) 2~B'2'9Il' eO!< 28B.2$01
PARKS &. RECREATION
i20~ 888.3519 . Fox aOHSO I
PUBLIC WORKS
(20Bl 89B.5$00 .f" B87-1101
BU1LOINO DEPARTMENT
,"oa} SEl.W] . F.. 8E,.1297
PLANNING AND ZONlNO
(20B) S!4.SS31. F.. M8-G8S'
CITY COUNCIl.. MEMBERS
Tommy deWeerd
W,lham l.. M. NiU)'
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 8:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the fOllowing issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Uft Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this Slh day of December, 2002.
,\,'l~IUUIJ/1
\,,\ t: ,,~- "'" JL
,I".. Or 1Vlt:F,ID ""
" ,,'" ~ ~ h A ~
fa cP!'J'O~rC'; 1- '%, ~ /..<. /..4--'7-1
~ ~ ;0 ~ (L...-'
j ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK
.-
33 EAST IDAHO' MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . eO!< (208) 881.48 13 . Cny Clerk Omce F~~ (208J 888.4218 . Human Reso.r... Fa. {208 I 288.1193
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
'V l~CLse ?o~.t fby ?lA-bU-c. (W-k~I~Wvt\LS;~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie McCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station:
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10, 2002 Page I of I
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Officc at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
I
AS OF DEC 136 '132 17: 15 .4GE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
131
03
134
05
06
137
00
139
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
27
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PSS
12/86 16: 47 20888413744 EC--S 013' 19" 001
12/86 16: 49 2088467366 EC--S Oe'19" 13ei
12/136 16:513 208 SS8 5581 EC--S 1313' 17" 001
12/06 16:51 LIBRARY EC--S e0' 19" 001
12/06 16:52 92083776449 EC--S 00'18" 001
12/e6 16:53 2063686924 EC--S 00'19" 001
12/06 16: 54 2088886854 EC--S 00'17" 001
12/06 16'55 89513390 EC--S Be'18" 1301
12/136 16:56 Lau,.el EC--S 00'19" 001
12/136 16: 57 208 387 6393 EC--S 00' 16" 001
12/06 16:58 ADA CTY DEVELMT G3--S 013'38" 001
12/136 16: 59 CHERIE MCCANDLES EC--S 013' 22" 001
12/06 17:013 CHERRY LANE EC--S e0'213" 001
12/06 17:01 POST OFFICE EC--S 013'24" 001
12/06 17:022136866 1983 G3--S 00'27" 001
12/e6 17:e3 2e6 467 9562 EC--S 00'19" 001
12/e6 17:e3 200 886 67138 EC--S 88'18" 1381
12/e6 17' 15 KEITH BIRD ----5 00' 00" 000
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
CMD~
0219
009
1309
0139
0139
0139
0219
009
0139
0139
0219
009
009
0139
0139
0219
809
809
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
BUSY
-----------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------
6:00 p,m, 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
\-> ~o..se ?o~-l: hrr ?l.<.-b-t;,G Ylo-hec1lrtC<Nl\C.?;:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PR.E-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p,m.
. City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
_ Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary
Cherie McCandless Keith BIrd
_ Mayor Robert Corrie-
Adopti on of the Agenda:
Sewer Trunk Fee update:
2.
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station:
Moridi.nCllyC"""oiJ Asmdo-ll<'<1IlbC' lo.;l()O~ Pas.lon
All nulori", F'""",..d.. pub~. rn"'into 'lWl b_mt pro;>cltY .r1lo. CilY ofMoritli,n.
M'iOM dcirint z.cc-orrtm.:>dation for dWbililiCil rdll.lcd [0 d~mt'DU sndl'arhunnes
pJ",.. conla..lh. c;,y Ct..k,'. Ollie<.. SS8-4433 IIl..,,4~ hou" jlriOl'ICtll" pubtic moctiog.
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
AS OF DEC 06 '02 16.47 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
28
29
30
32
DATE TIME TO/FROM
12/06 16:43 3810160
12/06 16:44 PUBLIC WORKS
12/06 16:44 12084664405
12/06 16:46 8841159
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
MODE
EC--S
UF--S
EC--S
EC--S
MIN/SEC PGS
00'25" 001
00'09" 001
00' 19" 001
00' 19" 001
CMDI:l
009
009
009
009
---------~~~----------------------------~-----------------------------------~---------------
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
j) ~Clse ?O~-t fi,y Yv.-b\;.c., f'lot\c.c-1~CVY'\JLS:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 6:00 p.m.
, City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
_ Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary
Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird
_ Mayor Robert Corrie
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursementfor Lift Station:
Mcidi." City COllllC~ Aga>da - December 10. 2002 PaGe I of 1
Alll'll.!llcial. prosantlld 1lI public mMin~ shall become propcrtl' of the City afMeridion.
Anyone ~ accommodation for di~bililie. reloled to documents 4ildlor h~T1l';$
pIca.. contact the CiIY Clerk's Offic. at 8884133 .. [Cllst 48 hours prior [0 the public meeting.
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
~,!"
.~ J5',
"- -~~.-'-.~'Jt~
. ( '. !(",>> :,.S<
~.,n~..,r~ .~
oW'e;dl;~~~ '\
I
~ IOr\HO J}
.A Y
~~ f
['f::~~
,~QI~CE
: 1903
LEGAL DEPARTi'vIENT
(208) 288.2499 ' Fax 288.2501
PARKS & RECREATION
{208 888-3579' Fax 898.5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 'Fax 887.1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 'Fax 887.1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 ' Fax 888.6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. NalY
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian
will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on
Tuesday, December 10,2002 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as. the following issues:
- Sewer Trunk Fee Update
- Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2002.
\\\\\l11\IMIII.~lltllll A
"\~l of c!iZro III~
", '4.;';, AA.
/rf ,#,0,,",0"< '<-0 '" \-, ~ /..< /./<-.-r' 9: .
I ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK
SEAL -
"'1 []:-.:
:;. &- ....C5 0 .-;:
...-4'& ~ ~
~ "10 'Sr 1~\ . ~. $'
"0 ....., c- \-;J ...-:;.....
;';'/1 o~ !~. ''-T't. "...,
I.sI1f~.r.,'.:~~ _~"~c::,". ~.,~ ;"; ~.\- ~,\
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . Fax (208) 887-4813 . City Clerk Oftice Fax (208) 888.4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 288-1193
O~ :/7-[0
C/'a/YtJ&St -<,~, ()
December 23, 2002
RECEIVED
DEe 2 3 2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
City Clerk
Will Berg
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Lochsa Falls FF/CL
Dear Mr. Berg,
On December 17,2002 the City council approved the Facts, Findings and Conclusions of
Law for Lochsa Falls with one week for the Developer to request further changes. After
reviewing the documents Farwest LLC and Daniel Gibson are fine with these documents
as they are.
~OU,
?stin Martin
~CZr-
~/\ /'
'\ V\ V (}'>Q 0,
d"- (@Y
~
I Ie \'7 ' I:' ~/,J/,...(h'li .cIYrIC(', ,li", I{)Y
,W,,;.,.,. .<;i;!tfl!" .\:1;// (:.JOll) ,;.\'<1'-0/')'9 ,0f,2' (!!(!l\'JS76~:.!()//
DEe 23 '02 14:44
208 376 2041
PAGE. 02
$~!lJflfe
FAX COVER SHEET
To:
WHlBerg
From; Justin Martin
Fax:
888-4218
Pages: 2
Date: 12/23/02
Phone: 888-4433
Re;
o Urgent
o For Review
o Please Comment 0 Please Reply
. Comments:
M87.A~ @~.9'Ia.a:> ~ -102 EJjo4;ey ,ffdalw 8.!J7-J4 (208)888-0189 (208) 816-20N
DEe 23 '02 14:43
208 376 2041
PAGE.01
January 31, 2003
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST
February 4,2003
ITEM NO.
Approve minutes of December 10, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting:
3-ft
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
~p
Date: Phone:
Materials presented at public meetrngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
6:00 p.m. 3.
6:30 p.m. 4.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
o
X
Tammy de Weerd X
Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Bill Nary
Keith Bird
2.
Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
Sewer Trunk Fee Update: Get comments back to Public Works
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station: Make requirement on Castlebrook
Subdivision to enter into agreement
Meridian City Council Agenda - December 10,2002 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10. 2002
The Pre-Council Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00
P.M. on Tuesday, December 10,2002, by Mayor Robert Corrie.
Members Present: Robert Corrie, Bill Nary, Keith Bird, and Cherie McCandless.
Members Absent: Tammy de Weerd.
Others Present: Bill Nichols, Brad Watson, and Will Berg.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
o Tammy de Weerd X Bill Nary
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Corrie: I will open the Pre-Council Meeting on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at
6:00 P.M. and ask the City Clerk to have roll call attendance please.
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Number 2 is the adoption of the agenda and I believe Mr. Bird has an
addition if he would -
Bird: No, we want to do this in the regular one if it's okay.
Corrie: Oh, the regular one, oh I'm sorry. I thought maybe you wanted to do it-
Bird: But I will Mr. Mayor, I will move that we adopt the agenda of the Pre-
Council Meeting as published.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay motions been made and second to adopt the agenda as published.
Any further discussion? Hearing none all those in favor of the motion say aye.
All ayes motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 3.
Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Corrie: The first one is the Sewer Trunk Fee Update, Brad.
Watson: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council Members. I hope to just put up on
the board what I think you probably have. Do you guys all have a hard copy of
this report?
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10,2002
Page 2 of 14
Bird: I emailed you and asked you to send, to bring some.
Watson: You did? I have one.
Berg: I can make copies of what you sent me.
Bird: I forgot to look mine up Brad. I know that it's on there somewhere but it
wasn't real handy.
(Inaudible discussion amongst Council Members)
McCandless: Oh I have that but I can't find the other one.
Corrie: I've got copies of that one (inaudible).
(Inaudible discussion amongst Council Member)
Watson: I can give you a little background while Will's making copies of this.
What I've done and what I thought or had hoped was passed out to you in
August was an update to both the Assessment Fees and a new, what we are
calling a System Development Fee which I think would serve the purpose of what
you would call the Sewer Trunk Fee. The Assessment Fee portion is really no
different than what we have right now. It's merely an update based on slightly
modified methodology for calculation. I should wait until you get the summary
sheet. The Assessment Fee portion would go - for sewer would go from 1580
per ERU up to 1609 so it's not really a significant increase. What we're seeing
with the sewer is we've put so much in the ground over the last couple of years
that we're starting to see some economy upscale on those fees. However, on
the water side the Assessment Fee would go from the current 704 dollars up to
1,052 per ERU. That's the easy part of this. I can stop there if you have any
questions.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad this is a fee that we will have on every Building Permit that is
purchased right?
Watson: Council Member Bird that is correct. We already charge this fee to
every Building Permit that connects to the water and sewer it's merely an update.
Bird: But is this fee like Boise's that puts a fund -- build their own sewer lines and
stuff so they're not going - the developers having to do it and then having these
latecomer things which are a nightmare for you guys, for the Accounting people
and for the clients.
Meridian City Pre.Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 3 of 14
Watson: I'm just talking about the first part of what I'm going to present to you.
I'm just talking about the one that we already have and we're merely updating.
The Wastewater Assessment Fee would go -- it's about two percent, the water
side - I guess I'm gong to have to calculate that rear quickly.
(Inaudible discussion amongst Council Members)
Watson: The packet that you have has I don't know a nine to 10 page narrative
that explains how these fees were arrived. That, I don't know that I really want to
go through the whole thing tonight but as time allows you may want to review
some of that to show the background behind these fees, how they were
developed in 1996, how we've updated them and slightly modified the calculation
methodology on the Assessment Fee portion. That takes up probably the first
three pages. You'll note on Page 4, Section 4 of this draft report a section called
Reimbursement Agreements. What this is related to is this new fee we call the
System Development Fee. For the Wastewater, side of things the System
Development Fee would be 815 dollars per ERU. I have tried to model this after
Boise City's Ordinance so that - and you will find some description in there of
what Boise City's Ordinance is and how they implement this program. The
bottom fine is if a developer constructs oversized, over depth sewer before that
project goes to construction we would require, if they want reimbursement for
them to bring those costs to us and then to the Council so that a Reimbursement
Agreement could be developed and executed. That's very different from what we
do now where we wait until the project is finaled and as John will explain here on
Item Number 2, it's only been that we enter into a Latecomer Agreement. The
problem we get into with the Latecomer Agreements is that another project will
come on the heels of the original development before the original one is done
and we have to put a placeholder on their Building Permit. There's a Latecomer
Fee and it says to be determined. That doesn't set well and it wouldn't with me
either if I had a project and didn't know what fees I was going to be paying. This
way everything's up front, the one impact to the development community that
might cause a little bit of heartburn is that we would require that they solicit bids
for their utility projects. I understand that Boise City does this too. There are
some developers that have their favorite contractor and that's who they want to
work with so soliciting bids may not be something they want to do. Maybe John
can talk about that he works with a lot of these guys. On Page 5, there is a table.
It includes both Boise City's reimbursement percentages and the ones that we
propose. Mine is a little bit scaled down, simplified version and I developed that
based on unit prices that we had experienced in Meridian. I don't know how they
develop their percentages but I tried to follow the same format based on Meridian
data. That's why it looks different than Boise's.
Corrie: Brad, help me here to read this table five. I'm not quite understanding it
but let's take the 10-inch of the top, go down to 15, 16 feet I assume that's the
depth?
Watson: Correct.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 4 of 14
Corrie: Okay so you've got a 23.9, 29.4 and then another column 19.4. How
does that read? If it's 14 to 15 inches, feet excuse me it's 23.9 what does that
mean?
Watson: Mr. Mayor that particular cell right there - the cells on the left of the 10-
inch column are Boise City's reimbursement percentages.
Corrie: Okay and ours would be the 19.4?
Watson: Right. They had a reimbursement percentage for each and every foot.
Corrie: Oh, all right I see.
Watson: And I'm just lumping it from 14 to 16 feet it would be 19.4 percent is
eligible for reimbursement.
Corrie: Okay, thank you. I wasn't seeing that at all so - okay thank you.
Watson: The reason I simplified the table from what Boise City has is somebody
has go to go through and review each and every pipe to figure out how deep it is.
I guess if they're willing to pay higher inspection or review fees from our staff,
that's a possibility but at this point, we don't have staff to sit around and count
pipe or count depth of pipe.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Brad, in developing this part of this memo did you - I'm assuming Boise
has some experience as to what's worked, what hasn't, what's been positive, and
what's been negative. Is that also incorporated into this memo?
Watson: Council Member Nary to a certain extent yes. Most of what I've done is
based strictly off their ordinances and copies of Reimbursement Agreements that
John Tensen has given me. In all honesty, it's been quite some time since I met
with Mr. Tensen, probably about a year ago. Over the course of last spring and
even into the summer while I was working on this from time to time, I guess I just
referred back to notes and materials he gave me. He may have some different
experiences over the last year that I'm not aware of.
Nary: And the only reason that I ask is that knowing how the government works
sometimes fixing the problems that don't seem to work as well as we thought
they would takes longer than to continue just doing it. Sometimes people just
keep doing it and don't change the ordinance and so I wandered if they'd had
some other experiences that might be beneficial to us here in putting this
together so that we can avoid the same pitfalls that maybe they've found I don't
know.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10,2002
Page 5 of 14
Watson: That very well could be and what I would like to do with this whole
issue, this whole concept is one present it to the BCA. Obviously, they would be
interested in it. Second, I would like to have a member or two of the BCA and
potentially some other development type people take a look at this and see from
their point of view what - since this is modeled so much after Boise City see what
works for them in Boise and what doesn't. So, I'm not butting heads with them all
the time if we implement this system. Undoubtedly I would need to get with
Boise City before this ever went to Public Hearing. This is really the initial well
this is the initial draft that anybody has seen. I've probably done this four or five
times over the last couple of years but it has never gotten to this point. I've put it
before a lot of eyes internally but no one has ever seen fit to give any comments
on it so I would appreciate anything that I could get on this.
Nary: And I think my only other comment would be I mean I think it's a great idea
and I think it's something we do need to look at and go forward on. I think the
plan you're talking about is the exact way to do it. We need to find out both from
the development community side what their concerns are if any and what would
work best for them. I think we need to talk to the City of Boise because they can
at least get that perspective from the government side as to what works or
doesn't work for them. I think it's certainly something worth exploring.
Watson: Sure. I fully plan on doing that. The one thing I would like to add is this
concept does extend to the water system as well. I'm not sure somewhere in
here I have addressed how that would work. There are another 20 or 30 pages
of spreadsheets and calculations and somewhere in that I think is how the water
system reimbursement would work. It's a lot simpler than the sewer is. Item,
what is it? I don't know at the top of Page 7, Paragraph B I've gone over a
couple, pointed out a few transition problems in going to the current system to
this new system. We have 20 to 30 existing Latecomer Agreements of barring
balances. This is something that I haven't even broached with Gary and I hate to
bring it up without him here is there are about 10 agreements with a balance of
25,000 or less. At some point, I would like to at least explore the possibility of
just the city buying those out and collecting the fees from those as development
continues in the developer's area. It would simplify things a lot.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad I would like to see you get with Gary. I for one would be very
favorable of seeing us buy those out and get (inaudible). We probably waste
25,000 a year in headaches, finances, and stuff like that. I would absolutely love
to see you do that get those bought out.
Watson: Okay.
Corrie: (Inaudible).
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 6 of 14
Bird: Yes, that's what I said talk to Gary and see what he thinks.
Corrie: I think I've talked to him a couple of times and I know what he thinks but I
think you're going to have an easy road there.
Watson: Okay, I think that would almost have to be a budgeted item for next
year.
Corrie: Right, sure.
Nary: I think it's a good idea too.
Bird: I think it's a very good idea if Gary agrees with it.
Watson: One of the other things that's included in this draft report and you don't
have the appendix yet I'll make sure everyone gets a full copy this week. I've
tried to do a 20 year cash flow projection for both water and sewer fund. Are you
doing the whole thing? Oh, well you will get the appendices tonight.
Unfortunately the ones the show the 20 year cash flow projection are a little more
draft then the rest of the report. Once we get auditors information for this year, I
think we'll be able to tidy that up pretty well.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad I see on your projections that you say it will probably be 20, 20 with
the continued growth as it is before the fund - before the System Development
Fee Fund would be on the positive side of the ledger. I guess the only thing I
would say to that is you got to start somewhere. You would hope that it would
meet it a little sooner but you start a new system you aren't always going to be
on the positive side right off the bat.
Watson: I'm sorry Council Member Bird.
Bird: That's on Page 8 Brad Item 0 the last paragraph so the five million deficit
of 2007.
Watson: Right, that deficit is really it's a big swing one-way or the other. I think I
had eight million in that cash flow projection for the Black Cat Trunk construction
so that maybe a little bit misleading. It could swing - if we didn't build it, it would
be, plus three million I think. I would have to go back through it.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
i
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 7 of 14
Bird: Brad even on your table 6 and turn to the other cities. You know the two
cities that we are next to Boise and Nampa we still even with your discussed fee
we're still under them in the total Wastewater fee by quite a margin.
Watson: Council Member Bird correct. As of August anyway, I haven't updated
this tabled or researched it since August but I don't foresee that there are many
changes. It is lower yes. I think probably one of the main reasons Boise and
Nampa is higher - although the table doesn't really reflect this with Nampa but I
know Boise City's undergone a huge expansion at their West Boise Plant. I'm
sure that was wrapped into any updates they had over the last couple of years.
Nampa has undergone major upgrades too on their treatment side but it looks
like they have most of their fee wrapped up in the collection system. I'm not sure
why.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Brad, under - on the same page on Page 9 under the Meridian column
you've got other potential charge various existing Latecomers Agreements. Tell
me what you mean by that and how that plays into - if someone has to pay a
Latecomer Fee to hook into the sewer main that was installed by another
developer why would they also be paying the system development charge?
Watson: Well Mr. Nichols that's one of the transition problems is when
somebody develops if a new project comes in say it's as an example upstream of
Silverstone Subdivision where there's an existing Latecomers Agreement. I
presume that's a decision we'll either have to make as part of this ordinance or
as a case by case basis whether they pay both the System Development Fee
and the Latecomers due to Silverstone or not. I see the conflict.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council I think you would almost have to
give a credit up to the amount of the system development charge because if
they're already paying the equivalent of the system development charge for
hooking into an existing line they're then paying their proportionate share. The
system development charge is to pay the city, to reimburse the city or the city to
reimburse then another developer for installing a line. In this case the city hasn't
done that all and the developers already put the line in. It might be a matter of
wording it as a credit up to the amount of the system development charge. They
would still have to pay that Latecomers Fee because we can't breach those
agreements with those developers but at least - I don't think we can charge them
twice. For somebody else that's coming in we might need to so that's an issue,
we've got to look at.
Corrie: Good point Bill.
Watson: Mr. Mayor I think that would be even the more the reason to eliminate
as many of these existing Latecomers Agreements as we can just to avoid the -
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 8 of 14
Bird: Very true. Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad is there anyway you could - I know there is that you could come up
with what our total, what we've got out there totaling in Latecomers Fees right
now?
Watson: Council Member Bird yes. In fact, finance gives us a monthly statement
of what the balances are and the revenues from the previous month on their
each and every Latecomer. I don't have it with me unfortunately.
Bird: No, (inaudible) right now Brad.
Watson: It's - with the inclusion of the Silverstone Agreements and G.L. Voigt
Agreement for crossing the interstate it's pretty significant right now. Those two
alone I'm guessing but I think more than double the balance for the principles of
the existing Latecomers Agreements.
Bird: You looking atfive, six, seven (inaudible)?
Watson: No, I would guess one to two to three.
Bird: That's what I was going to say.
Watson: I'm probably wrong the next time I come back.
Bird: Well I think G.L. Voigt was almost a million itself wasn't it?
Watson: The Silverstone one both water and sewer combined was probably just
a shade over a million. The Voigt was about a quarter of a million.
Bird: A quarter. Yes, it says with Silverstone and Voigt would add over a million
dollars to this balance.
Watson: Right.
Corrie: Anything else Brad?
Watson: No, I just would appreciate any comments on the concept. I hope no
one gets bogged down in all the figures and facts of the spreadsheets. That's
just there to show you if you're interested how it was derived. The concept of
these Reimbursement Agreements is something I would really appreciate
comments on.
Corrie: Okay. Anything else on the concept?
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 9 of 14
Bird: I don't I just appreciate all the work that Brad's done on this. We need to
keep onto it so that if not this year that by budget time next year we've got a
solution and we've got something going into it that we can put in our budget and
get it taken care of.
Corrie: (Inaudible) work Brad thank you.
Watson: Thank you.
Item 4.
Blackstone Subdivision I Coral Creek Subdivision Request for
Reimbursement for Lift Station:
Corrie: We're right on time here 6:30 Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek
Subdivision Request for Reimbursement for the Lift Station. You want to say
anything Brad at all on this.
Watson: Sure. Mr. Mayor and Council Members this might appear overdue but
what has happened here is Coral Creek and Blackstone Subdivision's formerly
English Gardens is one lump project came in two or three years ago. Public
Works and I think Council at that time were both pretty adamant that that would
be the only project served by the lift station that they would need to install to get
sewer service. You may recall recently that another subdivision south of that
Castle brook right Castlebrook Subdivision has at least a Preliminary Plat
approval. John Carpenter from Pinnacle Engineers contacted me who was
evidently contacted by the developer of Blackstone / Coral Creek about any
cause sharing that might be available. Castlebrook will be hooking onto the
existing lift station. They have to modify it and upgrade it and I have not even
seen their plans for doing that yet so I don't know what that entails. I'm not sure
how this would be calculated but I directed Mr. Carpenter to simply contact or get
in front of the Council to request that Public Works examine developing a
Latecomer Agreement for that lift station. Without Council approval to enter into
one, we won't do it and that's where we are.
Carpenter: My name is John Carpenter with Pinnacle Engineers. For the record,
I work at 12552 West Executive. Brad pretty much summed it up. My client,
Projects West out of Washington proposed the subdivision at Cherry and Black
Cat two or three years ago. We ended up doing it in two phases. One of the
conditions of approval of our development was to construct a lift station that was
solely for two subdivisions. That lift station has been constructed and it's
functional. At the present time, there is a subdivision to the south that wants to
tie into the lift station and my client wants to know if there is a potential for
reimbursement for any of his costs for that lift station. Really, for the lift station
and for the pressurized sewer line that heads north to the existing (inaudible)
sewer line. That's really, what we're asking. You guys may recall Pintail Pointe
Subdivision just to the east of Blackstone a relatively small subdivision. They
have already hooked into the lift station that we're talking about. We, my client,
and the owner of Pintail Pointe worked it out between themselves on the cause
sharing at that time. I don't know what I'm asking Council but I'm asking Council
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 10 of 14
to allow Public Works and myself to come to some resolution as what the
Latecomer Fee and how it should be set up should go.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Carpenter has your client approached this other developer to see if
a similar arrangement could be worked out such as the one that was worked out
with Pintail Pointe?
Carpenter: He has not. There's really a bigger question. The big question is
how much ground and how much development is the City of Meridian going to
allow south that could potentially tie into this lift station. Is it just the one property
and if so we probably could approach that particular developer and come up with
some arrangements but is there going to be any other tag on subdivisions that
would have the same issue down the road? If it's just one, then yes, maybe we
could work it out with them. If this is going to be a regional lift station that
potentially is going to serve several developments then I think the latecomer
arrangement is what we're looking for.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Brad, what's your perspective on the potential service area for this. We
just got through talking about how we really don't like Latecomers Agreements
and if the two developers got together, worked it out and kept us out of the
collection and disbursement business that's -
Carpenter: What we did with Pintail Pointe is we took the total number of lots
between the three subdivisions and allocated it that way. That's pretty simple
math. We would be more than happy to do that for this other development. I
don't even know how many lots are in it the subdivision we're talking about just
south of Coral Creek.
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, and Mr. Nichols this Castlebrook project
is approximately 40 acres. The same developer has had initial contact with the
Planning and Zoning and Public Works Department about another 60, 70 acres
directly east of that. We had discovered through flow monitoring and some other
things that the Ashford Greens lift station has more capacity than we had
projected with the original design. That's what's driving us is we're fighting
excess capacity in that Ashford station. Fortunately or unfortunately, however
you want to look at it. There's a different problem with that property to the east
as far as water service so I'm not sure that one may be stalled for a little while.
More could potentially come in if they're willing to pay for the upgrades to this
Blackstone lift station. If these guys could get together and work this out
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 11 of 14
between them, I would probably buy the donuts and rent the room to them free if
they could figure it out.
Carpenter: How many lots (inaudible) Brad, sorry to interrupt?
Watson: I would guess in Castlebrook there are 140.
Carpenter: 140? What the Council did for Pintail Pointe was made a condition
stating that they needed to work out an arrangement with Coral Creek and
Blackstone developments. If you guys want to make that as a condition, we
would be more than happy to do that.
Nary: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: You know Mr. Carpenter I mean I think more than anything we want to be
fair. I think - but I think Mr. Nichols is right. As you can tell by our earlier
discussion we want to get out of this business of these latecomers so whatever
other methods we could try at least. If it doesn't work, I mean if the other
developer isn't very cooperative and you find it to be really a road block in trying
to get this done then maybe we need to talk again and talk to them a little bit
more as well. It would seem to make sense from the city's perspective if we
could make it a condition on the other developments and that your client work it
out with them like you've been able to do successfully already. That would
certainly benefit the city more than having a Latecomers Agreement. If it isn't
possible, if it won't work, if they won't come to the table and be cooperative
certainly we would be more than happy to sit down and figure out how to make
that work because we want to be fair. We don't want to get into another one if
we don't have to and then having the same discussion a year from now.
Carpenter: Yes, and there are benefits to my client with that approach as well.
Obviously. the payment could be quicker instead of waiting for each lot to get a
Building Permit. There are pros and cons I assume for both of them. I can
certainly see how it's more beneficial to the city. We have no objections to doing
that.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Brad, isn't Castlebrook already approved, Preliminary Plat anyway?
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, and Mr. Nichols I knew that question was
going to come up too. I don't know. I know the Preliminary Plat's approved but I
don't remember the Final Plat being before the Council.
Nichols: I don't think the Final Plat's been done.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 12 of 14
Bird: The Preliminary is.
Nichols: The Preliminary Plat in my recollection the Preliminary Plat, annexation,
and zoning was approved probably last month or October. It's relatively recent
that was a Heartland Development isn't it?
Watson: Correct.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Mr. Carpenter what kind of cost does your client have in that lift station?
Carpenter: It's about 75,000 dollars.
Bird: 75,000.
Carpenter: That's for the lift station and for the asphalt repair patch back
(inaudible).
Berg: Mr. Mayor lookin~ back on the records the ordinance for Castlebrook was
approved November 18t so it has been annexed.
Corrie: So it's there okay.
Nichols: So there's a Preliminary Plat approval and annexation has taken place
but not a Final Plat?
Berg: Mr. Mayor I don't remember seeing a Final Plat yet.
Nary: Well if we just approved the annexation on November 18th, it probably
hasn't come through yet.
Corrie: Thank you.
Carpenter: Now is that a condition we can put on the Final Plat?
Corrie: I don't see any problem with it do you Mr. Nichols?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council I would have to look but my
initial reaction would be that it's appropriate to include it as a Final Plat approval
of condition in that costs associated with that. I think the key would be whether
there was any discussion up front with those folks about whether there would be
any cost to hook into that Ashford Green lift station.
Watson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, and I can look back through meeting
notes and previous correspondence. The one thing to point out is when we get a
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 13 of 14
Preliminary Plat they draw a box on a piece of paper and say a lift station or two
lift station. Until that Final Plat application comes in we don't have any details
how they're - I mean really how they're going to sewer that with a lift station. I
guess I would look at it as we're seeing this for the first time with that Final Plat
application the nuts and bolts of how they're going to sewer it. In concept, we
have discussed using that Coral Creek lift station but the magnitude of what they
need to do, how they need to upgrade it and pump replacement I don't know I
haven't seen any of that.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. I would recommend that they be
told now that this request has been made for Reimbursement Agreement and
that something goes from the city to Heartland Development that tells them or to
their engineer that's preparing the plats that this needs to be considered and this
is part of the cost that they have to factor into it. I understand that on - you know
with the latecomers they only pay as each house goes up, there is a separate
agreement with Mr. Carpenter's client, and it might be all at once or some similar
sort of thing. I think there was also phases in that subdivision too so that it might
be tied to a Phase Plan. The other thing that I think needs to be addressed is
since Pintail Pointe was a different developer but also participated in the cost of
this lift station and the pressure line they need to be a party to the agreement too
because some of the cost that's being reimbursed is some of the cost that they
paid as well. As far as the fairness, issue goes they need to get back into it too.
Corrie: Okay do we all kind of agree on that then along with you?
Carpenter: It sounds like a good concept it does work with that.
Corrie: Brad we can get together and make sure we get those things worked out.
Watson: Sure, no problem.
Corrie: Okay, all right, any other questions?
Bird: I have none Mayor.
Carpenter: Anything I need to do for you Brad, write you a letter or anything like
that to get this thing moving?
Watson: I can give you all the details afterwards okay?
Corrie: Okay John.
Carpenter: Thank you Mayor.
Corrie: Thank you very much. That kind of clears us up, good evening how are
you today. There's nothing else on Item Number 4 so I will ask if the Council has
any other things that they want to discuss at this time.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
December 10, 2002
Page 14 of 14
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Then I will entertain a motion to close the Pre-Council Meeting.
Bird: So moved.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay motion been made and second to close the Pre-Council Meeting
any further discussion? Hearing none, the Pre-Council Meeting closed at 6:45.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:45 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
OB RT D. CORRIE, MAYOR
\\\\\lllllllllJll
\\\ M"~ III
,,\\~, Of 'cRib", 1/1........
...,... ,,-.. '11 '//
::" a o~.?OR4)'; . v ~
.::- !J <$'0 -::.
2 '" -::.
.4 ~
- -
;;: SEAL r.) ~ ATTESTED:
'7 Q ~
~ v^ ,,0 0'::-
" - ~U<;'o i ' ~ .::-
~ '<) .." IS' x~. $'
'l/,r '-1 \V ,,'"
"('/ Co' "~~'i 1 \\",
/11, .....,.J".. \\\
.IJ{;::i c".: ,\\
;Z ! 4-- ! tJ.?
DATE
(
December 6,2002
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
REQUEST Sewer Trunk Fee Update:
Pre-Council Meeting
December 10,2002
ITEM NO.
3
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT;
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
Contacted:
COMMENTS
Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
i
I.
Sharon Smith
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Will Berg
Friday, December 06,20025:36 PM
Sharon Smith
FW: December 10 Pre-Council Meeting - "Sewer Trunk Fee Update"
Sharon, see if you can find this draft document that Brad refers to - we may need to make
copies. Thanks. . Will
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Watson [mailto:watsonb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:11 PM
To: Mayor Corrie (E-mail); Tammy de Weerd (E-mail); Cherie McCandless
(E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); WILLIAM NARY (E-mail)
Cc: Gary; Will Berg (E-mail); Bill Nichols (E-mail)
Subject: December 10 Pre-Council Meeting - "Sewer Trunk Fee Update"
Mayor & Council Members,
I note that an item called "Sewer Trunk Fee Update" is listed on the draft
pre-Council agenda for December 10. Since I presume you will want Public
Works staff to either present something or there to answer questions, I
would ask that you bring the copy of the draft "Water and Sewer Assessment
Fee Update & System Development Fee Proposal" handed out to you at the
August 13 Council meeting. This will enable all of us to follow along on
the same document.
Please let me know if you do not have that document and I will make another
to put in your mail boxes or bring to the meeting. The document is
approximately 50 pages long so I hesitate to make another ten copies unless
necessary.
Thank you. Please let me know if you have any questions prior to the
meeting.
Brad
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian, 1D 83642
(208)898-5500
(208)887-1297 fax
watsonb@meridiancity.org
www.meridiancity.org
1
(
Proposed City of Meridian
Water and Sewer
Assessment Fee Update &
System Development Fee Proposal
~,E li:IV
r. r f' <'1 "1002
Lic!.... ~>;:i t. _
I.
Introduction
A. General
8. History & Status
C. Enterprise Fund Financial Planning Goals
City Of Meridia,H
~,.,& ("'11 1 0"'''
tHY". eLI rnee
II.
Proposed Wastewater Fees
A. T reabnent
B. Collection
C. Trunk Fee
(Q) ~./ ,i\ & 'l?
"-. 1ft iflJ I.r V
III.
Proposed Water Fees
A. Assessment
B. System Development
IV. Reimbursement Agreements
A. General
B. Boise Cily Methods
C. Proposed Reimbursement Program
D. Transition Problems
V. 20-Year Cash Flow Projections
A. General
8. Wastewater
C. Water
D. Sewer Trunk Fund
VII. Comparisons
VI. Recommendations
APPENDICES
1 Fee Summary
2 Enterprise Fund Balance it
~ -rk "i:>e.. 0.... '{" e: v\o
3A 20- Year Enterprise Fund Balance with Existing Fee Structure e:::\-~ ~
3B 20- Year Enterprise Fund Balance with Proposed Fee Structure C6< (e.<.... '1
4A Sewer Trunk 20- Year CIP
4B Sewer Trunk Fund 20-Year Projection
SA SewerTrunk Buildout Cost Projection & Development Fee Calculation
58 Wastewater T reabnent & Collection 20- Year CIP
5C Wastewater Charge Summary
5D Treabnent Cost & Depreciation History
5E Collection System (City & Developer-provided) Cost & Depreciation History
6A Water System 20-Year CIP
68 Water Fee Calculation Summary
6C Water System Cost & Depreciation History
60 Water System Development Fee Calculation
7 WWTP 20- Year Capacity Projection
8 Boise City Ordinance & Example Reimbursement Agreement
r~ __
! ('J! I L ~ , !;" r--,
L,:::;' i'. i.. :5 9
l.! lJ (F\j U U
ii
Proposed City of Meridian
Water and Sewer
Assessment and System Development Fee Update
I. Introduction
AGeneral. This paper proposes an update to the fees traditionally called
Assessment (a.k.a. Connection, "Hook-Up' or Equity Buy-In) Fees charged to each
new connection to the municipal water or wastewater system. Also included are
proposals for new water and sewer trunk System Development Fees and a
reimbursement system to replace the Latecomer Fee system that has been used in
Meridian.
B. History and Status of Fees. The City of Meridian water and wastewater
Assessment Fees were last updated in October of 1996. Since that time Significant
improvements have been made to the water and wastewater infrastructure allowing
the City to grow at an annual average of 9% or 36% total in those 6 years
(according to residential building permit data).
Current water and wastewater assessment fees are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table l.Current Water Assessment Fees
Portion of Assessment Fee
Distribution & Supply, City- $540
constructed
Di stributio n, Developer -constructed $164
Total: $704
Table 2. Current Wastewater Assessment Fees
Portion of Assessment Fee
Wastewater Treatment $908
Collection, City-constructed $294
Collection, Developer -constructed $378
Total: $1580
(~
i u0 j rE7': f.i r--.
I ~" Lr.' "'., .-- L--'I
--...... I 1"- ! . -. i r'
uU\jLrU
1996 WWTP Capacity:
2.8 mgd
or,
26,000 population
equivalent
2002 WWTP Capacity:
Approx. 5.5 mgd
or,
55,000 population
equivalent
Cost to Buildout Existing
WWTP: $10 to $15 M
Cost to Build Parallel
WWTP: $24 M
Potential Phosphorus
Removal Capital Costs:
$4 to $6 Million
Avg Well Construction
Cost: $470,000
Avg, Well 'Density': 1 well
per square mile
Total Water Supply
Capacity: 26 mgd
The City has constructed nearly $12 million of water and sewer improvements since 1996 to meet growth. Another
$20 to $25 million in water supply, storage and distribution and wastewater collection and treatment will be needed to
meet the forecasted 2020 population demand.
C. Enterprise Fund Financial Planninq Goals. The goals of the current enterprise fund planning are:
. Provide safe, reliable and environmentally responsible services to ratepayers with costs based on long-
term economic analysis.
. Provide adequate funds for replacement of existing facilities as they reach end of useful life.
. Provide adequate reserve for operation and maintenance.
. Provide adequate emergency funds for repairs to water or wastewater systems,
. Provide funds to expand and improve facilities to meet growth demand without incurring debt.
. Provide adequate revenue to allow City to extend system in effort to guide growth.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8.S-02.cutdoc
1
To achieve these goals, connection fees must accurately reflect the expected needs of the water and wastewater
systems.
User rates, which were recently updated, are based on a 'cash needs' revenue requirements. Revenue generated
by user fees covers operation and maintenance expenses, debt service requirements (of which there is none for
Meridian), facility replacement and repair, and administration. User fees do not fund facility expansions or extensions
for new development but will contribute towards construction projects that: 1) improve overall system quality, 2)
improve overall system reliability or 3) meet increasingly strict federal or state regulations.
New users that consume system capacity should provide revenue to expand and extend systems. This will be
accomplished by imposing Assessment and System Development fees on new connections. In general, Assessment
Fees cover a new connection's proportionate share of the costs of the existing 8-inch lateral water and sewer system.
System Development Fees will provide funds to reimburse private development and the City for construction of sewer
and water trunks.
~ ---",.
".-.-' \.
, ;...J
<--:g C;-:~J
II.
PROPOSED WASTEWATER FEES
"
A General. The Assessment Fee is intended to assess new connections to the system their proportionate share of
the capital costs of the existing treatment and sewer trunk system. Their share is based upon the replacement cost
of the system, less depreciation, divided by the overall capacity of the system. This type of fee has been charged to
all new connections for at least the last 17 years.
The 'System Development Fee "has not been implemented. It would serve to expand or extend the system and, in
the case of water and sewer trunk extensions by developers, provide funds for reimbursement in lieu of the
traditional Latecomer Agreements.
B. Treatment. The proposed wastewater treatment assessment fee would decrease
from $907 to $736 per ERU, The reason for this decline is that the capacity of the
system has increased and we are beginning to see some economy of scale as a
result of our capital projects. The calculation for this fee is summarized in Appendix
5C and detailed calculations are in Appendix 50.
Projected Cost of All
Sewer. 10" and greater in
Impact Area: $29 million
Number of Additional
ERU's Projected: 46.500
The proposed wastewater treatment assessment fee represents a 23% decrease from
the previous fee.
Additional Equivalent
Population:
121.000
C. Collection System. The proposed collection system Assessment Fee consists of two
components:
1) existing City-funded non-trunk assessment, or "buy-in", charge
2) 50% of developer provided sewer assessment, or "buy-in', charge
Sewer Master Plan Area
Buildout
ERU's: 59,400
Population: 154.000
The City funded trunk "buy-in" charge is intended to collect funds from new customers, proportionate to their share of
the cost of 8-inch Jines and temporarylinterim lift stations constructed by the City. Again, the proportionate share is
based on the replacement value of the facilities (less depreciation) divided by capacity. See Appendix SC for the
calculation summary and Appendix SE for specific calculations.
The second part of the Assessment Fee is intended to collect 50% of the replacement cost, less depreciation, of all
8-inch sewer constructed by private developers. Although depreciation is calculated and funded annually by user
fees, that depreciation is based on original sewer construction costs that did not, for the most part, include new
street construction, Actual, current-day replacement costs would be significantly higher since streets and potentially
h:\enterprise\auQust\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cut.doc
2
curb and gutter, sidewalks and storm water drainage facilities must be replaced, It is estimated these non-pipe line
related costs are approximately 50% of any repair or replacement project.
The proposed wastewater Assessment Fee would increase from $1580 to $1701 per ERU, Breakdown of the
proposed assessment fee is shown in Table 3.
T bl 3 P
d C
W
A
&S
D
F
(jj (0) /~
UU t4J Ifr !il
a e . ropose vs. urrent astewater ssessment :iystem eve oDment ees
Proposed Current
Assessment Fee Assessment Fee % ChanQe
Treatment $736 $908 -23%
Collection, City-constructed $304 $294 35%
Collection, Developer- $568 $37S 50%
constructed
Assessment Fee Subtotal: $1608 $1580 2%
System Development Fee $815 0 -
Total Wastewater $2423 $1580 53%
Connection Fee per ERU:
The proposed collection System Development Fee (informally called a Trunk Fee) would serve two purposes: 1)
provide reimbursement to developers, in lieu of latecomer agreements, who construct sewer trunks and interceptors
and 2) provide reimbursement for City construction of sewer trunks and interceptors (sewer greater than SO).
The System Development Fee is based on the total projected cost of constructing all remaining trunks and
interceptors (greater than S") throughout the City of Meridian sewer master planning area (See Appendix 4C). Also
included in this fee is an added 5% to administer a proposed Sewer Trunk Fund. The System Development Fee will
allow the City to recoup costs for trunk projects in the areas in which it decides to encourage growth. It also
eliminates the Latecomer Agreements in their current form. Individual reimbursement agreements would still be
completed with each developer constructing off-site sewer trunk, but those agreements would be completed prior to
construction and subject to City approval of costs claimed.
The specific methods of the reimbursement agreements will be addressed in a later section.
III. PROPOSED WATER FEES
A Assessment Fee. As with the "equity buy-in" fee for the wastewater collection system, the water Assessment Fee
consists of two components:
1) existing City-funded distribution, supply and storage assessment, or "buy-in', charge
2) 50% of developer-provided distribution assessment, or "buy-in', charge
The proposed water Assessment Fee would increase from $704 to $1,052 per ERU. Breakdown of the proposed
assessment fee is shown in Table 4,
B.System Development Fee. The proposed System Development Fee does not exist in the current fee structure.
The water System Development Fee is intended to provide funds to the City or reimburse developers (in lieu of
latecomer agreements) for construction of 12-inch and larger water lines. This charge is based upon the standard
policy of constructing 12-inch water main in all section line roads and along all mid-section lines. One implication of
this fee structure is that no latecomer or reimbursements would be made for construction of water lines smaller than
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cuLdoc
3
12-inch diameter unless it is an off-site extension. Table 4 above shows the proposed System Development Fee for
water. It includes a 10% program administration mark up. See Appendix 6D for detailed calculations.
T bl 4 P
d C
tW t A
tF
a e . ropose vs. urren a er ssessmen ee
Proposed Current
Assessment Assessment
Fee Fee % Change
Distribution & Supply, City- $558 $540 3%
constructed
D istri bution, Developer- $494 $164 201%
constructed
Assessment Fee Subtotal: $1052 $704 49%
System Development Fee $330 0 -
Total Water Connection $1382 $704 96%
Fee per ERU:
@ ,!f1 /~ 0.::J
U U j -; \ . ~ C;-;::,/rl
vUu U
IV. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS
A. General. Adoption of the fees proposed in this analysis would represent a substantial change from the way fees
have been developed and implemented. The most challenging change would be the replacement of the 'latecomer
agreement' with 'reimbursement agreements,'
The total fees for a new connection to the wastewater or water system may appear significantly higher than Ihose
existing but they are close to the amount that is currently being charged at building permit application in many cases.
Portions of the sewer and water trunk charges will be reimbursed to developers who have installed sewer trunks and
interceptors or water trunks, Currently, many building permits have latecomer fees added to the standard water and
sewer assessments. This proposed reimbursement system would simply lump those fees Latecomer-type fees in
with the overall water and wastewater System Development Fee amount.
B. Boise City Methods. Boise eity provides for a trunk connection fee (BCe 8-11-03A). It is defined as:
The fee charged at time of connection... to recover the incremental over-sizing cost of trunk Jines, to recover
50% of (the) cost of lateral Jines, 50% of the Sewer Rating Section costs and to provide for the necessary cash
flow to fund pipeline extensions. The fee charged is based upon the estimated amount of flow generated by
the property being served in tenns of (single family dwelling equivalent).
The Boise City Code (BCC) may allow the developer to be reimbursed if:
1) the developer constructs sewer off-site which provides service to other property,
2) the gravity sewer within the developer's project is required to be larger than 8" diameter,
3) the extension includes a permanent lift station, or
4) the extension includes a temporary lift station that the City requires to be sized to accommodate other
property .
Bce 8-11-05.09 requires a written agreement with the developer, not to exceed 10 years, to provide for
reimbursement of the proportionate costs of sewer benefiting adjacent or other property. The ordinance goes on to
state that reimbursement will be in one or more of the following forms:
1) offset against assessment fees paid by developer
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cut.doc
4
2) offset against inspection fees
3) offset against trunk connection fees paid by developer
4) reimbursement of trunk connection or assessment fees received by the City as others connect to the sewer
downstream of the original developer's property
5} same as 4) above, except property upstream.
The amount of reimbursement for off.site gravity sewer extensions is based upon "reasonable bid prices received"
and may include "reasonable engineering and easement acquisition costs approved by the City." I understand this
section to mean that Boise City individually evaluates such off-site extensions to determine the amount of
reimbursement owed the developer the same as Meridian Public Works is doing. The difference is that Boise City
may reimburse in one of the five ways listed above (methods #4 and #5 would continue to require the on-going
bookkeeping presently taking place with the latecomer agreements),
A sample agreement provided to us by John Tenson, PE, Boise Assistant City Engineer, is similar to Meridian's
latecomer agreements except that:
1) the agreement is completed prior to construction
2) reimbursement, or "share of costs", is specifically listed
3} Boise City refunds trunk connection fees collected at the time of building permit issuance to individual
builders, on a quarterly basis, until the full reimbursement amount is paid or the term of the agreement
expires, whichever is first.
.~ r7=\I i1 r:'-. ,
:"~..J ~ J l."., .'_-t, . ,"",_~J y.l
0::!J U.-"j ,:~;---,.j t~:J ~ j
.... u
Meridian's latecomers agreements also become null and void after 10 years, regardless of whether the developer
has been fully reimbursed.
The primary benefit of this type of system is that project-specific reimbursement amounts per acre or per lot do not
have to be calculated. Only the overall reimbursement amount is specific to each development. The amount
collected at buildinq permit does not chanqe. The second benefit to the developer is that a portion of the
reimbursement comes directly from hislher own development. Consequently, it is in their best interests to ensure
their project is successful.
In Boise the developer, prior to construction, solicits bids on the sewer work and submits those costs, along with
engineering and easement acquisition costs, to the Public Works Department. The City may enter into a
reimbursement agreement with specific reimbursement percentages, depending upon size and depth of the sewer
installed by the developer, listed in the sewer ordinance. Table 5 lists Boise's and our proposed reimbursement
schedules (Meridian Public Works in italics):
Table 5. On-site ewer Pi Jeline Reimbursement PercentaQe
10' 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" 27" 30" 36" 42"
12' - 13' 11.8 14.3 21.7 18.2 33.5 22.9 44.9 30.8 53.3 41.3 59.8 46.0 64.9 53.4 68.6 60.3 78.8 68.6 82.7 75.9
- f--- - - - I- - - I-
13'.14' 17.9 26.6 37.1 47.4 55.1 61.1 65.9 69.5 79.2 83.0
14'.15' 23.9 19.4 31.4 22.9 40.6 27.G ~ 34,1 56.9 43.8 ~ 48.1 66.9 55.0 70.3 61.4 79.6 69.3 183.2 76.3
- 144.0 - f--- - -
15'-16' 29.4 35,9 52.4 58.8 63.9 68.0 71.2 80.0 83.5
16'-17' 34.5 31.6 40.2 34.1 47.3 37.2 54.7 42.6 60.6 50.0 65.3 53.4 69.1 59.1 72.1 64.5 80.5 71.3 83.8 77.5
- f--- i--- - - f--- r-- - I-
17'-18' 39.2 44,1 50.4 57.0 62.3 66.6 70.2 73.0 80.9 84.1
18'-19' 43.6 34.9 47.8 37.2 53.3 40.0 59.3 44.9 ~ 51.8 168.0 55,0 71.3 60.3 73.9 65.4 81.3 71.9 ~ 77.9
t--- I- - I- - -
19'-20' 45.6 49.6 54.7 60,3 64.9 68.7 71.8 74,3 81.6 84.6
?0'-21' 47.7 37.9 51.3 40.0 56.2 42.6 61.4 47.1 65.7 53.4 69.3 56.5 72.4 61.4 74.8 66,3 81.8 72.4 84.8 78,2
I--- f--- - - l- I-- - - I---
10'-22' 49.6 53.0 57.6 62.5 66.6 70,0 73.0 75.3 82.1 84.9
?2'-23' 51.6 40.7 54.7 42.6 58.9 44.9 63.6 49.1 67.4 55.0 70,7 57.8 73.5 62.5 75.7 67.1 82.3 73.0 85.1 78,6
s
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cut.doc
5
53.4 56.4 60.3 64.? 68.3 71.4 74.1 76.2 82.6 85.3
55.2 57.9 61.6 65.? 69.2 72.1 74.7 76.7 82.8 85.5
57.0 59.5 62.9 66.7 70.0 72.8 75.2 77.2 83.1 85.7
58.7 61.0 64.2 67.8 70.8 73.5 75.8 77.7 83.4 85.9
60.343.262.4 44.9 65.4 47.168.850.971.656.5 74.259.1 76.4 63.5 78.1 67.983.673.586.1 78.9
61.8 63.8 66.6 69.7 72.4 74.8 76.9 78.6 83.9 86.3
63.3 65.2 67.7 70.7 73.2 75.5 77.5 79.1 84.2 86.5
30' 64.8 66.5 68.8 71.6 74.0 76.1 79.0 79.6 84.4 86.7
Note: the proposed Meridian percentages shown in italics are based upon estimated construction costs
only..
Note that this reimbursement schedule is for on~site, over-sized, over-depth sewer only. As mentioned previously,
off-site sewer extensions are not subject to these percentages and reimbursement agreements are individually
prepared for each project (BCC 8-11-05.08.C.1).
The off-site reimbursement would be based on the proportionate cost of the improvements serving the developer's
property compared to the overall benefit area. A copy of Boise City's sample reimbursement agreement is
contained in Appendix 7.
A. Proposed Reimbursement Proqram. Key points:
7)) J~l ~
. Costs for on-site, over-sized and over-depth sewer would be reimbursed to the developer at predetermined
percentages such as shown in Table 5. Reimbursements would come from System Development Fees
collected from the building permits within the developer's project and developments upstream that
eventually connect to the system.
. Costs for off-site over-sized sewer would be reimbursed to the developer in accordance with any
reimbursement agreement entered into by the City. Reimbursement amounts would be based on the costs
of the extension, less the cost of providinq a-inch sewer, apportioned over the benefited area of the
extension.
co The City would add 5% to all wastewater System Development Fees collected for administration of the
program. Additionally, the City would retain 50% of the remaining fee amount in a separate Sewer Trunk
Fund for trunk extensions, permanent lift stations and the planning and design thereof.
. The City would add 5% to all water System Development Fees collected for administration of the program.
The City would additionally retain 25% of the remaining fee amount in a separate Water Trunk Fund as
reimbursement for extensions it has made or is making. The percentage retained is reduced as a way of
encou raging developers to provide water mai n extensions instead of the Ci ly .
. Water Trunk construction by developers will be reimbursed 100% of section-line road water line costs.
Internal over-sizing would be reimbursed at the differential cost of providing 12-inch water line versus the
costs for 8-inch water. Costs for lO-inch water mains within subdivisions would not be reimbursed under
this proposal.
Based upon the System Development Fees proposed and a projected 800 single family residential building permits
per year, nearly $50,000 would be generated to administer the program. This would likely afford the program one
full-lime employee.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cuLdoc
6
8. Transition Problems. The major obstacle in converting the traditional latecomer agreement system to the proposed
Reimbursement Program is how to treat the existing latecomer agreements. Over twenty latecomer agreements
exist with an outstanding balance of approximately $1,810,0001. The highest latecomer fee currently charged is
over $700 for reimbursement for the Ashford Greens Lift Station and related improvements. Ten agreements have a
balance of less than $25,000 with five of those under $10,000 (Finance Department, through 6/30/02).
Continuation of the existing system while trying to implement the proposed system would make accounting difficult
and cause confusion to the development community. Significant staff time would be required in addition to the
possibility of another person to administer the program. Potential options are:
· Continue of the existing latecomer agreements charge only the System Development Fees proposed herein
to the building permits. Continue quarterly reimbursement to the original developers with existing latecomer
agreements. Collect System Development Fees from the building permits within the developer's project and
be reimburse that developer (as opposed to the present system in which builders within the developer's
project are not charged the latecomer fee).
· Propose a 75% (or some other negotiable percentage) buyout of the outstanding balance of the existing
latecomer agreements and start over with all new developments subject to the new system.
· Continue with the existing system only.
No reimbursement system, or combination of systems, is universally simple or equitable. In fact, simplicity and equity
are inversely proportionally; i.e. the simpler the system is, the less precise it is. Conversely, if we attempt to very
precisely determine the exact reimbursement percentages of every development, adjust fees based on different
service areas, and tie portions of every fee charged to several different layers of development, a small department
would have to be formed to administer the program (which would drive up costs for funding it). The system in this
proposal is an attempt to balance fairness with simplicity.
VI. 20- Year C ash Flow Projections
A. General. It may appear that the enterprise fund is large and that the City can afford to build several sewer and water
trunk lines, but significant commitments must be made to keep up with both wastewater treatment and water supply
and storage capacity. To date, the City has been responsible for providing these portions of the infrastructure while
the development community, in general, provides the collection and distribution extensions.
The 20-year cash flow projections contained in Appendices 3A and 38 include increasing contributions to a 'sinking"
fund. This fund would be built up to provide for repair and replacement of the facilities as they reach the end of their
useful life. The WWTP, put on line in 1979, has a life of 30 years. Although some of the facilities will continue to
operate beyond 2009, certain components have already become obsolete even with superb maintenance (digester
covers, clarifier mechanisms, various pumps, electrical systems).
The 20.year cash flow projections list both sinking fund and CIP fund running balances. It is important to note that
the CIP expenditures listed in the worksheet do not include replacement and repair costs.
B. Wastewater. The existing treatment facility will reach its hydraulic and spatial limit (built out} in about five years, at a
current day cost of $10 to $15 million. It will provide a peak monthly capacity of 9 mgd, or a population equivalent of
about 90,000. Based on current population projections the existing built out plant will be sufficient until around 2017
to 2020.
1 The G.L.Voigt and Silverstone latecomer agreements would add over $1 million to this balance.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cut.doc
7
Eventually, a parallel, wrap-around treatment facility will be needed to serve the ultimate buildout population. The
land owned by the City upon which the WWTP sits will provide adequate space for the additional facility. We
estimate the additional treatment facility to serve the additional 60,000 population equivalent will cost approximately
$24 million (6mgd @ $4fgalfday treated for phased isolation ditch-nutrient removal technology, Water Pollution
Control Federation Journal, Vol. 59, No.9). This figure is in current dollars which, assuming annual inflation at 2.5%,
equates to nearly $40 million in twenty years.
The 20-year cash flow projection worksheet based on the 20-year CIP's for both water and sewer is contained in
/Appendix 3A based upon the fees proposed in this study. Obviously, substantial funds will need to be generated to
J.'7 I be able to fund the future facility with litUe or no reliance on loans or bonds.
" 0.. Q; _ ioV"
i\j J \<$ The cash flow projection in Appendix 3B is based upon no change, other than annual Inflationary adjustments, to the
{e. existing wastewater and water fees. It is evident from the worksheet that substantial funds would have to be
borrowed (at least ~!mim9n) to construct the second treatment facility without adjustments to the fees.
C. Water. Water supply and storage facilities are placed in service incrementally. A specific amount of population
growth necessitates addition of a certain number of wells. Consequently, the Water CIP is based upon providing a
number of wells proportionate to the projected population. A few other factors determine the need for a well such as
the area of growth, which pressure zone the growth occurs in and development density, but those cannot be
determined until the development occurs.
The cash flow projections in Appendix 3 include the water supply, storage and distribution systems. It is evident that
substantial funds must also be committed to the development of the water system.
D. Sewer Trunk Fund. A preliminary examination of the proposed Trunk Fund was completed and is shown in Appendix
4B? 5F. As mentioned Section V, Reimbursement Agreements, the proposed Trunk Fund would provide the City
with funds to design and construct sewer trunk extensions and provide reimbursement funds to developers instead of
piecemeal latecomer fee collection.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to project the amount or timing of reimbursements to developers for sewer trunks they
will install. The cash flow projection simply assumes a starting balance of $375,000. It is also assumes the City
constructs the Black Cat Lift Station and the portion of the Black Cat Trunk north of 1-84. The worksheet also
assumes beginning developer reimbursements of $100,000 per year increasing at a rate of 20% per year until the
amount of reimbursement is 50% of the annual System Development Fee revenue received.
There is significant risk to the City that it could over-commit the amount owed to developers through the accumulation
of Reimbursement Agreements. If the City enters into a multitude of Reimbursement Agreements for trunks built
throughout the area of impact, there will not be enough revenue to cover the reimbursement obligations. That is why
this proposal and a revised ordinance to follow will require that any Reimbursement Agreement be a discretionary
option of the City and not a requirement.
Even with the proposed System Development Fee, the worksheet shows a deficit of nearly $5 million in 2007. This
assumes construction of the Black Cat Trunk in that year. Not until Y2020 would the fund come near being on the
positive side of the ledger.
VII. COMPARISONS
It is difficult to compare the fees proposed in this report with those of other municipalities because each includes
different components. The following table lists related fees for several nearby or similarly sized cities.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cuLdoc
8
T bl 6 C
t Oth C'ti W t
a e ompansons 0 er I es- as ewa er
(2)Boise Nampa Lewiston C'DA Meridian
reabnent $1,530 $455 $871 $1,422 $736
Collection - Assessment $1,540 (4)$1,720 $425 $965
Collection - Capital Charge or $830 $1,055 (6)$789
~ystem Development
Total Wastewater Fee: $3,900 $3,230 $1 ,296 $1,422 $2,490
fOther Potential Charge (3)$500 (5)$300 Various Extg.
Latecomers
(1) All figures based upon single family residential building permit, <8001 s.f. lot.
(2) Boise City Ordinance Section 8-11, Repealed and Replaced 12115/98.
(3) Southwest Interceptor fee applied to one specific, albeit very large, service area.
(4) "Area Fee" of $O.215/sf up to 125' lot depth. Example based on 80' x 100' residential lot.
(5) "Regional Lift Station, Lines and Interceptor Fee"
(6) Trunk System Development fee discussed herein.
[Q) ~ <~ r~ Tf
U~L"0 J
T abl 7 C
e . ompansons 0 er I es- a er
lewiston Nampa C'DA Meridian
Supply Assessment (3)$1,709 $370 $1,050 $1,052
Distribution Assessment $185
Capital Charge or System (2)$900 $330
Development
Total Water Fee: $1,709 $1,455 $1,050 $1,382
Other Potential Charge
t Oth C'ti W t
(1) All figures based upon single family residential building permit, <8001 s.f.lot, W meter.
(2)Based on standard residential lot with 80 feet frontage.
(3)From 1998.
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS
The Public Works Department recommends that the fee system described in this report be adopted by the City
Council pending (eual and finance department review. Public Works also offers the following recommendations:
a) Review of this analysis by several representatives of the development community.
b) Revision to the Sewer and Water ordinances to allow implementation of the proposed fee system.
c) Establishment of separate sewer and water trunk accounts. These accounts would be used solely for trunk
sewer or water main extensions or reimbursement to developer's who install such facilities.
It should be noted that the establishment of separate trunk sewer and water main accounts would not preclude the
City from building trunk sewer or water main with other funds. The City should still be able to use funds from the
main enterprise fund to construct water or sewer facilities that increase the reliability of system, replace or repair
facilities or provide better overall service to the rate payers.
h:\enterprise\august\proposed fee update.8-5-02.cutdoc
9
APPENDIX 1
WASTEWATER
(1)Updated Fees
Using New Calc.
Methodolog
$ 736
$ 304
$ 568
$ 1,609
Assessment Fee
Current Fees
$ 908
$ 294
$ 378
$ 1,580
Treatment:
Collection-City Projects:
C ollectio n-Su bd's,:
Subtotal:
System Development Fee
.Collection: $
Subtotal: $
$
$
$
$
815 Total wlo
815 Sys. Dev. Fee % Increase
$ 1,609 1.8%
TOTAL FEES: $
Previous Fee:
Percent Increase:
1,580
2,424
1,580
53%
N/A
WATER
f'O' rN
. LV ul,S;u' t\ f'C? t;7,
, LriJ lr fj
Assessment Fee
Current Fees
Distribution & Supply-City Projects: $
Distribution-Subd.'s: $
$
540
164
704
558
494
1,052
System Development Fee
Total wlo
330 Sys. Dev. Fee % Increase
330 $ 1,052 49%
ment Fee:
Subtotal: $
o
TOTAL FEES: $
Previous Fee:
Percent Increase:
704
1,382
704
96%
N/A
City Comparison of Wastewater Treatment & Collection System Fees
8/912002
FEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
Fee Summary
Enterprise Fund Balance
1. Replacement Cost (un-depreclated) as of 8/1/02
VlJWTP $20,233,073
Collection System - Developer Provided $21,388,180
Collection System - City Constructed $7,911,768
Subtotal: $49,533,021
Water SupptylStor. -City ConstructE
Distribution - Developer Provided
Distribution - City Constructed
Operation & Maintenance Equipment
Wastewater Department
Public Works/MUBS (50%)
$944,458
$0
$944,458
Water Department
Public Works/MUBS (50%)
Subtotal:
Total Replacement Cost:
$50,477,478
2. A~umulated Depreciation (per Accounting Dept.)
VlJWTP $4.406,793
Collection System - Developer Provided $2,292,639
Collection System - City Constructed $1 ,243,129
Subtotal: $7,942,560
Water Supply/Stor. -City ConstructE
Distribution - Developer Provided
Distribution - City Constructed
Operation & Maintenance Equipment
Sewer Department
Public Works/MUBS (50%)
$491 ,370
Water Department
Public Works/MUBS (50%)
Subtotal:
$491,370
Total Accumulated Depreciation:
Ace. Depr as % of Replacement Cost:
$8,433,930
17%
3. Determine Beginning Balance
Beginning Balance, 7/1/02:
FY '02 Projected Revenue:
FY '02 Expense:
$28,000,000 (estimate of cash, investments)
$10,490,000
$14,969,304
Use of Fund Balance:
Entprs. Funds Carry..Qver from FY '02:
Projected Fund Balance FY '02:
-$4,479,304
-$3,266,640
$20,254,050
4. Determine logical split between water & sewer fUnd balance
W.W. Assessment Fee, current: $1,580
Water Assessment Fee, current: $704
$2,284
W.W. Assessment Fee, pre-1996:
Water Assessment Fee, pre-1996:
$1,370
$500
$1 ,870
W.W. Replacement Cost, Total:
Water Replacement Cost, Total (estimated):
$50,477,478
$35,559,227
$86,038,706
$7,829,754
$21 ,787,241
$4,864,588
$34,481,584
$1,077,644
$0
$1 ,077,644
APPENDIX 2
Page 1 0(2
TOTAL
$35,559,227 $86,036,706
$1,096,517
$2,210,252
$556,329
$3,663,097
$270,407
$0
$270,407
$4,133,504
12%
69%
31%
730,(,
27%
59%
41%
Note: since assessment fees and depreciation revenues collected through user fees for both water & wastewater have been
comingled there is no way to easily track how much of balance belongs to either department. However, wastewater seems
to have spent more on capital projects over last four years than water. Use the following ASSUMPTION:
Assume split:
W.W.:
W.W. Fund Balance:
60.00%
$12,152,430
Water:
Water Fund Balance:
40.00%
$8,101,620
Summal)'l8I'6f.2OO2
Summary
bra<Lw\enlBrprlse\fee 5'.lmmary\FEE SUMMARY 3-&Q2
$12,567,434
15%
APPENDIX 2
Page 2 of 2
5. Determine fund balance required to adequately serve as sinking fund
for future replacement.
Wastewater Water
Fund Balance, 10/1/99 (from above): $12,152,430 $8,101,620
Minimum Operating Reserve, days: 180 180
Annual Operation Expense (FY '02): $3,330,000 $2,715,000
Minimum Operating Reserve, cash: $1,642,192 $1,338,904
Bood Retirement Reserve: $0 $0
Minimum Capital Reserve (assume): $l,QOO,OOO $1,000,000
% of Accumulated Depr. To Establish
Sinking Fund (assume): 50% 50%
Accumulated Depreciation: $8,433,930 $4,133,504
'Beginning Value of Sinking Fund: $4,216,965 $2,066,752
BEGINNING CIP FUND BALANCE: $5,293,273 $3.695,964
. Will require acceleration of depreciation collected through user fees to fully fund sinking fund
-::~J _"
&Jmmary/8/6J2002
Summary
brod_w\enlefpnse\fee summary'FEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
~
~
~
~
~ @J
)~
~ !?
:t-i
r
~
.5
'"
~
c
z
W
<L
~
88~
88...
ss.o
r~;
",,~
g: gg&
:g
""
.E
8~Si~
tmijfli
"l.:lt~;:l;
~ ~U
"
:5
..
.c:
o
VI c
:l: B
u.. .!!
'" ~
E ! ~
! ~~!I I
'0 ;~sp. -~
~ a~~ i:
:g ~.[m~ c~
.g ~~E~ ~i
"g j~~~ I'"
:;: :l!~~.s ..~
~ 1i;i1l E g'[
~~= E l'f.o..'7
~~8~ A
J~~ ~ !I
~ ~~~i ~~
.CD ,6 E
e- ~~
~ II
~
CD ~E~_~$~~
.~ ~:ll2 - -..,
~ l<f~:;}~m.
.! /.ol ;;; ~ ~
..n 1!
~ i~
-o...i .5 "
1: ~j
o .J!~
E ~g.
~ i~~ ~~
5. ;jj,g~ ~~
.sl!1!~~.. 11'0
lii~a'.~a88i1i
~ d).Ic!e,; :io::l$
l} e.'l> = &l ;Ii .s.5
o s<=ioo';:l
c: ai ~SEilfi
~..~o~tS~~.E
~IIJI!IJJ
~~~
;;_0
ei!"
8S'e
E
_iii!
gn
I-'-~(il
.!.'g
S"
aiu..
~i
~~~
9,,,.!!!
...1.1...
- m
lJi~~
11~!~
0:: cO::..,
~8,F'
...
~<=]
'[Ii
0.8of
d. :::::
sl:l~~
~E8~
! ~
0.,,8
fI<=<=
)IC..~..!!
:!.IJ..~
lih
0..20::::;
~8g~
... u.
Iii
'[lii
ll.8u..
J~i
w)w
~~
i Ei~
~ !.t~
- '"
~I&~
e ~
~~~~...~~m;~OO~"'~~~g~m~~~
~~~QC~~~~~~~~~~c~g:l~8~al~M
~~~~i~~a~~~~*~~~~~~~~I~~
i
'[
t
~
il
~
i
u
~g~~~8m*~~8~~8~~~~~~S8~i~
~~~~;;;~~~~;;;~~~;;;ww~;;;~~~;;;;;;
Ii
~im~i~~8~SS388~8E~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
u..
~~~~I~~~s~~~~~m~Si~~~~~$~~~
mm~~ im~g~~~~~~l2~s~~~~i8
mm~N ~m~g~M~~M~8~T~~oo~~
~~;;;;;;~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lilil!I~~!~~~*S*~~~~~8E~si~~
1~~~~~~~~~m~~~~8~~~~Si~~~~
~~~a~~~~~~~~ma~~~~a~~~~a
<D
~~~m~~~8m~"'~m8~~S~8~~~~~~
aa~~~~m;;;~a~~~a~~~~~~~~~a~
<I>
~~3~g33~~~~~"'E~~~~"'~re~$$8
~~~~~~~~S~~~~a~~aa~mmi~~w
,..
co
!~~~~3~~~~~~~~~~~~~i
w;;; ~W;;;;;;~~;;; ;;;~;;; ;;;;;;;;;ai
.i
f
'"
~
u..
Qj
~~~~~%~~~~~~~.~~.3.;~.~~.~~g~ 8~
~N~N~~~Oq-N~~l~~~~~~W~~~~
~~~~~o~~m~m8.~~MID~m8~~.~~~~
NN;S.rslO~~::Ro)olIONf')Nt.........\Oq .......vwW:~ -I
~~g~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~ ~
ii:
;j
~
-'
~
:::
i
OJ
~~a~~~~i~~~2g~~~SSs~~~~m~
~~~~~NN~~~~~~~wm~~~_~~~~<D
~0~0M~~"~~~00W ~~~w~~~~~
...
~~~~~~~~Si~~~~~~~~8g8~~~~
we~~WMW0~;~MM~~~W~~~U~~~
~~~&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mg~~~~
~~~~~~:_~~~~~mS~~~~~~~~~
..
:i
!!
..
E
E
~~~S~laa!~i~a~~Ra~~~aa~ ~
M "
~
..
~
"
i!
~-
:;
8:
ii
11
..
I
D-
e
1;
<=
o
"
~
"
~
u..
~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
~~~8~$~~~i~~~~~~~a~~~~~~
~ ~~;;;~~Ua ~wwwww~ ~~~ ~
'" o:! ..
~~~E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ NNN~~~~~~.~O~~~ww~w~~~~~~~~~
~~ ~
...
'" x
BE -
i~~8~~8~a~~~a~~~~~~re~~~2~~~~;~
~i~~~rero~~~~~~~~~s~~~m~~~~~~~g~
_w 0
~ ~
i
~~~~m*~8~SS~88~8g~~~~~~~~~~~
R-~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~
1.1.
~
(V
(?))
t(')
/1.;
, (
~
III
Q)
Q)
-
0 ~
C'l l\'
0 ~
C'l 1::
O'l tC
~ .c
~ 0
0:>
..-
~
r-
~
~
<0 8
~ c:
0 tC
C'l ro
...0 en
..- "0
0
('\l c:
::s
..r u..
..... Q)
0 (J')
N .c:
(l') 0-
......
..- .$
~ ~
C'l
..... tn
~ .....
0
I-
..... \
~
0
C'l ,
0
~
0
N
O'l
0 8
~
c:
0:> cG
0 tn
0 en
N
'0 -0
C
::s
~ u..
....
8 ll>
1U
0 ~
N
1.0 \
0
~
..r
0
~
(l')
0 Q)
~ 0
c
C'l cG
0 tn
~ en
-0
~ C
0 ::s
g u..
....
0 ll>
0 ~
~ (j)
~~
Co
it
~
.,j~ ./ ~~
k ~ ~ ~
1 l ,
~ ~ ~
\{ il
~ ~
.,j
. ~
~
. ~ ~
. ~ ~
I~ ;~
.( \? ,Ii
1
-~ / l(
\~P ~r !5"
,\ , ;'IT
~
1 ~ \\ ~
'. ~
/ _..1
."
.1
-
co
0)
co
<<J
e
=_0
~ 11.S
Q.:.c-
_0=
._ <<J 0)
0- =
...CQi'
a.. ..:: (I)
!!IOl Qt.Q
;:>==
cs.CO
-",,-
u... .c: ~
.c::-=
wa=
t'O""t'lJ
Co) ~ '#
...=N
t'O="'j'
~;::.
CD (I)
==0)
Nj~
"CI-=
c::cO)
_ t
.":* = =
_s.o
Q)15~
.~ E. =
...--
Q.. (I) .J:::
...=-
CDCt'lJ
_o~
=~-
w(,)'i
c::co=
,= ~ CI
is S =
.- co "='
-0=
CD<<Jt'lJ
:=-e
1
~ 8 ---
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 (;) 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0,
c:5 6 6 6 6 c:5 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 (;) 0_ 0 0 0
c:5 .0 0 .0 0 .0 Ul 0
~ ~ ~ ..... ..... th '!!.. ..-
th (/t E!2-
a'3u'e\'e9 pun:! \-elo.1.
t~
~ ~
1 ~&b
~~
~ \\~ ~
"<@
i
j
t
~
...
88~
!l~1;'
2:.8C1
IH
l'iH1il
~~lg
~a
~
e
I
j
i
H
it
!!:sli
~lLi
c
2
50
~8
I!
u
u
~
f
"
~
~
1;
,^
o
"
o
Q
g>
u
o
"
::;
j
i ~
~HH f
un n JI~~
~!i'~ h ~t
~~ij i.i
.!l!~i '[ 'llj
P:;:l i..;
"!!r: u II i t u
~hj II o~
II
~~;:::tla ii
~ ~.i! ~
~ ;; lli Ii
~~~~~;:~~~~a88~~~~~~~~~~~
~m~~~mm~~QQ___.~~.~Q~~~~
,~
u
t
Cl
..,
~
10
.~
~
C/l
<::
~
i
~
K
~~
'a:f
(J
<::
'"
'6 "
~!
..
~
~
oil
" I ~
I!j ~~j- j
j ~
ii " ~~ ~~~~~;.<;::;S!~qJ':;~:!::l;;:::!;:<!J;;~I;P'i:o;~~~~~~ i
j ~'o NNnn~~~n.T~~~~~~~ccc~~~~~~m~
~.:l '5"" .,: ~
! J l!~ j :
!... ii ~ n }~g~H~~ ~~ U~Hl:3~~2Hs ~~U1HJ ~ !
o i!~o ~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2a~g~~~g2~~~ e
t J~'O~~ S g ~
i -rU H ~ iHHiilin8-SS~:!l8l:;8g~::~::!;!:!:n::!!!!fl 1
:t !I i H ~- ---- -ld~fl fl!Hl~ lHlfl~l<lliHH:~~ ~flfl~ ~
-'l!!
I! ~q~q~~~~~~~~~~~qq~~~~~~Q~q
j!nN~~..~9~~~~~~maQc~mQQaomQQ
~~~8~i~!!!~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~
~~~M U~~~ ~ - a-M !
I
0 0 0 0 ~ --- s
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 fFt 0 0 0
0 0 o. 0 o. 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o. 0 0 0 0
0 6 0 6 0 0 0
$ (<) ~ ..-- .,.... N r;<I
fFt fh r.F> r.F> r.F>
-./ -./
a:Jue\ee pun:! \-elO.1.
IJ)
02- .~
~
02' ~
6'L a)
02- (.)
c
~
6>L ro
02' co
"0
<L c
::J
02' u..
S,{ Q)
If)
Oc- 'C
e.
S'L $
Oe- (5
J>L ro
-
02' 0
I-
l'L \
Oc-
e}
Oe-
LL
Oe-
OL IJ)
02' 'x
~
e. ~
VOe- ~
6>a 8 "0
C
Ve- ~ ::J
ro u..
<a co g>
V2' "0 ~
.9a c c
:;) (j)
Ve- u..
.... ....
..9a $ $
co co
V2' ~~
~a ~ ~
Ve-
l'a
Ve-
e-a
Ve-
La If)
Ve- .~
Oa ~
Ve- ~
6'e. "0
c c.
O'L co :;)
to \J-
<9e. co 0>
~L '0 c
c: '';:'
<& :;) c
u.. ro
l5'L .... ....
Q) Q)
~ ~
(l) Q)
(/)(/)
~ t
/c~,
""-'.:.J
fJ 'b -- 110 l~ ~
J , ~
.~ ~ .
" ,.. ;:.. ~~ ~
".~ ~
.,'z ~~~ ~~ V
l~ IV
l !. I
tt 1 ..
. ~ It I
~
~ '_I
- . ~
. . " \
..
. ~ ~ ~.
. l ~ i\ ,~
a ~ . ~ -~
~ 1.
Il ~ -~
J? ~ ) V
Iii r . ~.,
! It.
~-\ r1a
'''' II I ~
~ , III
(}..;
~
if
=
=
=.::
0-=
.- '='
-=
Q Cl
.~0
eelS
Q,.,otI
!:::!
s.=
",~N
.c,--
Cl)CI)a:!'
_t:..=
.... - =
C,,)4~
....:lel
ca (,) (IJ
.!! Cl.S C>>
-ca.e
= <$-
N:t:i
"a~e
=;:;;ioCl)
=_CI)
.. Cl C>>
- ~
CDSa:!'
.(1) ;: :=
;::(,)C>>
Q.e=
.....-
.e~
=0
I.U~
=.e
.~ .e
"C(I)
._ 0
..... (,)
CD (I)
2~
::s
-
Co)
=
.-
-
APPENDIX 5A
WASTEWATER TRUNK BUILDOUT COST PROJECTION
HYDRA computer model uses 100% saturation buildout.
Assume actual buildoul percentage;
Estimate personslERU;
70%
2,9
SeMce
Buildoul
ERU's
4634
16 531
286
18,819
Temp. lS
Est. Cost,
jf a licable
North Black Gal 1 8110 10,401 1151 3567 $916401 $71 B 750 $1 635151 $0
N,SlouQh 1 19850 13,895 2370 4791 $4 099 000 none $4 099 ODO
White Trunk - Main 15150 10605 1710 3657 $1 295000 $1 295 ODO
WWfP to White Trunk $408 000 $408 ODO
White Trunk (laterals onM $983 750 none $983,750
1131S, Slouoh Extension 7030 4921 902 1697 $1 276000 nooe $1 276000
1 (315 Mile Extension 3200 2240 524 772 $298 953 none $298 953
Five Mile Relief - Ph. 1 none $0
Frve Mile Relief - Ph. 2 $1 161 000 none $1.161 000
i
150.505 110,076 17,823 37,958 $28,213,454 $4.715.625 $32,929,079 $0
Ten Mile Trunk 16,000 16,000 2,185 5,517
FIVe Mile Trunk 34,060 34.060 4,115 11745
50,060 50,060 6,300 17,262
Ten Mile Trunk, exlg. 14,790 2,185 5,100
Five Mile, exlg. 22,330 4,115 7,700
37,120 6,300 12,800
Difference; 12,940 4,462
HYDRA Model
dout Population Projection: 200,665
should be approx:
Actual Est.
Buildout Pop
160,138
46 sections
HYDRA Area
24,123 56,220
37.7 sections
=(159,00012.9 personslERU)
mrte<! Additional, or future:
(buildout minus existing)
163,445
123,018
17,823
42,420
Gross Cost! Future ERU:
5%:
$n6.27
$38.81
$815
(1) Includes all sewer 10" and larger shown on master plan
(2) Ineludes pressure main costs
(3) Includes only that portion upstream Silverstone
61912002
Page 1 of 1
WWTP wwrP Eno'Mrln
CapIloI COst Legal costs
('02 ~l ('02 d<*l!sl
WiNTP
CapIloI COst
~1)
YeaI X 1,000 Xl 000 Slblalal xl000 S<:Ile<Ue<l
2000 $1'= $1'= $1.203 DewaterIno
$3.200 S3.200 $3.200 ~_ 0artIi.... Screen. EIect1caJ
$140 $140 $1'10 WiNTPVeNdo Ganloo
I ~: $4,5(3
:lOll1 $0
$700 $700 $700 l..8!I(lraIQly
I -= $700
2002 $OllO $125 S625 $625 ~ B<oansIon
$400 $80 S400 S400 W.'OulIUI
$75 $19 $94 $94 Plant NPW System
$200 $SO S250 $250 GOll3asln Ir2
I ~: $lM9
1996!t1'llug1200 $9,5lI3
2003 $100 $25 $125 $12l1 5IIe & Landsc8pIng
$250 $250 $256 IF8dItv Plan R....sIoo
S850 S213 $1,063 $1,089 DAFT Cooslruc1lon
$250 $63 $313 $3.20 cernm1e BasIn
S250 $0 S250 $256 FocItlv Plan
$SO $13 $63 $S4 Plant Telemo1ry
Slblalal: $3 591
2004 $100 $25 $125 $131 MlceIIaneoos
$0 $0 $0 $0 3 Removal (polentialy> $4nilon deoel
$750 $188 $93B $984 3 Removal
$215 S69 $344 $361 FIller #4
$850 S213 $1,063 $1.116 . Primarv OartIier #4
$OllO $125 $625 S656 Cen1riftJlle Ir2
$0 $0 $0 $0 Der/trlflcatloo BasIn CAB-1I: $1.7 niloolu1ded try userr_
-= $3 US
2005 $0 $0 I $0 $0 Mlscetaneous
$1,500 $375 I $1,875 $2.016 llIoseleclor Pf1ase 2
$350 $8$ I $438 $470 Blower #3
I ~: $2.486
2006 $450 $113 1 $563 $619 FIIlerIl5
6<bIota1: $619
:lOll7 $150 $36 ! $188 S211 MlsceIaneous
$250 $0 I S250 5281 Fndttv Plan
SltlIctaI: $492
2008 $1.500 $375 I $1.675 $2.156 0I00s!er #4
~: $2.156
;!009 $100 $25 I $125 $147 M1sce1aneous
~: $147
2010 $100 $25 I $125 $150 M1sce1aneous
~: $150
2011 $100 $25 I $125 $153 Mlscelaneous
Slblob>I: $lS3
2012 $100 $25 $125 $156 Miscelaneous
~: $1$6
2013 $100 $25 $125 $159 MlsceIaneous
~: $159
2014 $100 S25 $125 $163 Miscelaneous
S950 $238 $1.188 $1,544 5ecood8ry OartIier #4
SlbIolal: $1700
2015 $0 $250 S250 $331 $331 FuIIce PIon! Prefm. Plamlna
2016 $0 $750 $750 $W4 $994 Fulse Plant OesllJ'l
2017 $7,000 $1,400 $8,400 $11,130 $11,130 4lFu1!re Plant COr1s1JucIIon (Gmgdl. PhlIse I
2018 $7,000 $1,400 SS.400 $11.130 $11,130 4l1'uUe PIon! COnstndon, PhlIse Ii
2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL:
SU,9OO
$6,630
Total (inti. $):
Total (/nfI. $):
O_TotaI:
TotaI(02 $):
TotoI (02 $)'
a_TotoI,
&pem/oo ReIa/ed Tolel eo..t
(1) Assume inflation @ 2.5%
(2) All years in wl1ich no majorconstruetion is planned a $100,000 miscellaneous ttem
is shcfNn to CO\Ief small projects (vehicles, instrumentation, site, monttoring equipment, etc.)
(3) These Mure improvements are to meet expected pemltt limits and should be funded by ALL users
of system and no! only ne.N connections.
(4) Future plan! is based on phased isolation ditch technology w{ estimates from WPCF Journal
V. 59, No. 9 & EPA Pub. #832-F-OO-013, "Cb:idation Ditches" Fact Sheet
150,000 (buildout pop.) x 100 gpcd "15 mgd buildoutflow
(15 mgd - 9 mgd exIg. cap.) x S3fgal of capacity.. $18 million
$f1l,513
S23,t;BS
U1))98
$10,/100
$14,000
$Z4,tIOO
$23,61D
Years 2002-2014
y""", 2015-=
y""", 2002-2014
Years 2015-=
819/2002
CIP Schedule
APPENDIX 58
cip&cashflowprojection
8/912002
COLLECTION.Trunk Extensions
COIklctlon S'\1 EnlI'-
Cc>IIocIon Sys.
Caoi1nI Cosl L.ooal CO$ls r-"'llb>l Cost
$275 ~
~ $4{14
2000 $0
$100 $36 $216 PlanI North Tnrt
$912 $274 $1.186 5Ml. TIc. ReIef sewer. Phase I
~ $1.All2
2001 $0 $0 $0
2002 $1.000 $250 $1.250 Wile Tnrt C<Jro;ro;:Von (no
5100 5115 $215 LoaIst Grove I"" ACHO ro-blildl
SlbIotaI; $1~
2000 ~ 20C $2,861
2003 $1.Z20 $244 $1,464 $1,501 S. Slotdl Exlerolon
5150 $30 SIBO SI85 0VefIand Rood I"" ACHD re-lxJldi
S400 $400 $410 Black Cat Oeslcn
SWIo!nt n.095
2004 $6.000 $300 $6.300 $6.615 Black Ca1 construcIon
S50 S15 $ll5 $68 ~ Road fwl ACHO ro-blildl
SlbIotaI; Slt883
2005 $1.200 $221 $1.528 5Ml. TIc. ReIef Sewer. Phase III~n Rd. 10 A.bertsonsJ
SWIo!nt $1 528
2000 $0 $0 $0
2007 $0 $0 $0
2008 $0 $0 $0
2009 $0 $0 $0
2010 $0 $0 $0
2011 $0 $0 $0
2012 $0 SO $0
2013 $0 SO SO
2014 SO SO SO
2015 $0 SO SO
20Hi SO SO SO
2017 SO $0 $0
2018 $0 $0 $0
2019 $0 $0 $0
2020 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL: $ID,814
$1~
$ID.300
(1) Assume illflation@
2.50%
CIP Schedule
APPENDIX 58
elp&easItfk;Jwproje
APPENDIX 5C
WASTEWATER SYSTEM CHARGE CALCUlATION WORKSHEET
City Constructed Collection System Buy-In Charge
2002 City-Coostructed Collection Replacement Cost less Depree: $5,115,242 ~ ._' , n
Less Outstanding Bond Principal: $0 ., r-~)
If, : .:' S CJF)
Net City-Constructed Collection System Value: $5,115,242 '--' 1_.1~\ Lf /;
Collection System Capacity, ERU's: $16,800 J
2002 City Constructed Collection Buy-l" Charge: $304
Developer Provided Collection System Replacement Charge
2000 Developer-provided Collection Repla<:ement Cost Less Depree: $19,095,876
Provide 50% for repla<:ement: $9,547,938
Collection System Capacity, ERU's: $16,800
2002 Assessment Charge: $568
Subtotal: $873
Previous Collection System Charge per ERU: $673
Percent Change: 30%
System Development Fee (New Chargel $815
(see Worksheet titled 'sewer asset summ.' for separate calculations)
TOTAL COLLECTION SYSTEM CHARGE: $1,688
Wastewater Treatment Plant Assessment Charae
2002 WWTP Replacement Cost less Depreciation: $15,826,280
Less Outstandirm Bond Principal: $0
Net WWTP System Value: $15,826,280
WWTP System Capacity, ERU's: (6.0 mgd-o.7 1/1)/85 gpcdJ2.9 caplERU} ~-1Itim (approximately equal to 56,500 pop. Equiv.)
2001 WWTP System Charge per ERU: $736
TOTAL WASTEWATER CHARGE: $2,424
Total w/o System Development Fee: $1,609
Previous Fee: $1,580
Percent Increase: 1.8%
81912002
FEE SUMMARY.august
wwtp fee
( APPENDIX 50
Page 1 of 1
...~ ?
WASTEWATER TREATMENT COST & DEPRECIATION
Current Year 2002
Currant ENR-CCI 6500 (Spring '02)
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
Assel.TypelO Year Oescription Life Cost AccDeprAmt ERN-CCI Cost Ac:t.Oeprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT ~r Acc:tg
Vastewater Treatment
so.B1dg-WWTP CC 1960 SLOG - SEWER PlANT 600 $3,683,131 $3,145,113 3,237 $7,395,845 $4,250,733 $73,663
so.Bldg-WaterCC 1980 BLOG - OUTFALL PlANT (Ce) 600 $592,380 $497,596 3,237 $1,189,518 $691,922 $11,848
6O.8Idg.WaterCC 1980 SLOG - BOISE RIVER OUTFALL 600 $750 $630 3,237 $1,506 $876 $15
so.81dg-WWTP 1981 8LOG - SEWER PlANT ADD 600 511,677 59.861 3,535 $21,639 511,958 $236
so.Bldg-WWTP 1982 SLOG - SEWER PlANT ADO 600 Sll,780 $5,326 3,625 511,522 Sll,I94 $136
so.Pumps 1986 PUMP- PUMP AND HOUSE 120 $177,536 $177,536 4,519 $255,363 577,827 $0
so.lmprv.WWTP 1991 Improve. install Carrier Gas Furnace 120 $2.954 $2,360 4.835 $3,971 $1,611 $295
6O-Bldg.WWTP 1992 BLOG - New Building@WWTP 1992 360 $23,931 57,979 4,965 $31,204 S23,225 $798
so.lmprv-WWTP 1992 Improve - Influent Upgrade @ WWTP 360 5152,600 $40,696 4,985 $196,977 5158,261 $5,067
6O-lmprv-WWTP 1992 Improve - Fuel Containment Tank 240 S896 $315 4,985 81,168 $854 $45
so.Bldg-WWTP 1993 8LOG - Smile Creek Measurement SlroclJ 600 S38,941 $10,709 S,210 $46,583 $37,674 $779
so.Bldg-WWTP 1993 BLOG - WWTp Shop 360 $93,215 $25,634 5,210 $116,295 $90,662 53,107
so.lmprv-WWTP 1993 Improve - Pri Clarifier 8in Drain Line 360 $.4,100 $822 5,210 $5,115 $4,293 $137
so.lmprv-WWTP 1993 Improve. Bin Drain Line Manhole 360 $4,700 $942 5,210 $5.864 $4,922 5157
so.lmprv-WWTP 1993 Improve - Concrete Discharge Tra 600 $2,304 $2M 5,210 $2,874 $2,586 $.46
6D-lmprv.WWTP 1993 Improve - PhOne System 4-2 lines 240 $2,545 $783 5,210 $3,175 $2,392 $127
so.Bldg-WWTP 1994 BLOG . W Facility @WWTP 240 5181,413 $42,329 5,408 $218.044 $175,715 $9,071
so.lmprv-WWTP 1994 Improve - Natural Gas Line 360 $10,395 $1,822 5,406 $12,494 $10,672 5347
so.Equ;p-WWTP 1994 Equip - W Equipment 240 $132,512 $33.130 5,408 $159,269 $126,140 sa,626
so.lrnprv-WWTP 1995 Improve - Gas Valva @ WWTP 180 $2,654 5782 5,471 $3,153 52,371 $177
so.lmprv-WWTP 1995 Improve - 80ilerIDigester Rehab 360 $247,023 $32,250 5.471 5293,484 $261,234 $8,234
so.lmprv-WWTP 1996 Improve - Tertiary Fiflar 360 $311,465 $35,472 5.620 S360.235 5324,763 $10,362
6O-Equip-WWTP 1996 Equip' Sludge Digester Mixer 120 $67,971 $19,825 5,620 $78,614 $58,789 $6,797
60-Bldg-WWTP 1997 SLOG - WATER HEATER FOR PlANT 120 sa71 $274 5,825 6749 $474 $67
6O-Bldg-WWTP 1997 BLOG - ALUMINUM BAR GRATING 360 $1,838. $383 5,825 62,051 $1,668 $61
so.Bldg-WWTP 1997 BLOG . UV COVER 360 $1,413 $286 5,825 81,577 $1.289 $47
6O-Jmprv-WWTP 1997 Improve - Sprinkler Hand Lines 240 $1,434 $144 5,825 $1,600 $1,456 $72
so.lmpIV-WWTP 1997 Improve. Sprinkler Field System 240 $10.995 $1,100 5,825 $12,269 $11,169 $550
6O-lmprv-WWTP 1997 Improve - Spnnkler Field System 240 $2,380 S238 5,825 $2,656 $2,418 $119
SO.Equlp-WWTP 1997 Equip' Flowmetess 2 Sparring 120 $6,000 $2,000 5.825 $6,927 $6,927 $BOO
so.Pumps 1997 PUMP - SKIMMER PUMP (PUMPHOUSE 120 81,250 5181 5.825 $1,395 $1,114 $125
50-Lift 1997 PUMP. PUMP MTR, CENTER TURBINE 120 $3,333 S889 5,825 53,719 52,830 $333
60-Lift 1997 PUMP - PUMP MTR-8OUTH TURBINE (I 120 52.727 6727 5.825 53,043 $2,316 $273
6O.Lift 1997 PUMP - PUMP MTR.NORTH TURBINE(f 120 $1,487 5397 5,825 $1,659 $1,263 $149
so.Pumps (997 Pump. PUMP MTR (REBUILD) 120 53,032 S806 5,825 53,383 52,575 $303
60-Bldg-WWTP 1998 BLOG . Clarifier@ WWTP 360 $1,603.525 S178.1W 5,920 $1,760,627 $1,562,458 S53,451
so.Bldg-WWTP 1998 BLOG - Control BUilding @ WWTP 360 S13.650 $1,479 5,920 $14,987 $13,508 $455
6O-Bldg-WWTP 1996 BLOG - Remodel Admin to Control Bldg 360 $14,422 $1,562 5,920 $15.635 514,273 $481
6O-Bldg-WWTP 1996 BLOG - WWTP Admin Bldg 360 5332,252 535,994 5,920 $364.804 $328,810 SI1,075
60-Bldg-WWTP 1998 Improve. Alum Tubing for Railing @ W'A 240 $10,259 61,453 5,920 611.264 59,811 $513
6O.Bldg-WWTP 1998 Improve - Road @ ElkI10m & Gull Cove 240 $1,500 $213 5,920 $1.647 61,434 $75
6O-lmprv-WWTP 1998 Improve - EI~trical prolect @ WWTP 240 $29,585 61,479 5,920 632,483 $31,004 $1,479
so.Bldg.WWTP 1999 Improve - Drain Ditch Project 240 $15,425 $1,928 6,000 $16,545 $14,617 $771
60-Bldg-WWTP 1999 Improve - Handrail & Gate @ WWTP 240 $5,396 $652 6,060 65,790 $5,138 $270
6O-lmprv-WWTP 1999 Improve - Rotomat Conerels Pad 240 61,545 S58 6,000 $1,657 61,599 $77
6O-CIP-WWTP 2000 CIP - WWTP Lab Construction FYOO 360 $13.000 SO 6,221 613.583 $13,583 5433
6O-Bldg-WWTP 2000 WWTP Garage Construction FYOO 360 $140,457 $7,023 6,221 $146,756 8139,733 $4,682
60-Bldg-WWTP 2001 WWTP Aeration Basin 360 $2,027,336 581,946 6,342 62,077,844 51,015,897 $67,578
SO-Bldg-WWTP 2001 WWTP Dewatering Project 360 $1,503.479 $4,176 6,342 $1,540,936 $1,536,759 $50,116
SO-Bldg-WWTP 2001 WWTP TpadlClarifier 360 $3,322,268 $9,229 6,342 $3,405.036 $3,395,808 $110,742
so.Bldg-WWTP 2001 WWTp Generator 113 120 $201,826 SI,682 6,342 S2OO,854 $205,172 $20,183
5O-CIP-WWTP 2001 2001 WWTP Lab construction costs 360 $67,359 $0 6,342 $69,037 $69,037 62,245
6O-CIP.WWTP 2001 2001 WWTP City Water Project eosts 600 $77,115 $0 6,342 $79,036 $79,036 $1,542
6O-CIP-WWTP 2001 2001 WWTP Non-potable water Pfojecl 360 57,033 $0 6,342 $7,208 $7,208 $234
WASTEWATER TREATMENT TOTAL- $15,176,067 $4,406,793 $20,233,073 $15,826,280 $140.556
8/6/2002
sewer&v.wtp assets
FEE SUMMARY 3--6-02
APPENDIX 5E
Collection System
Current Year. 2002
Current ENR-CCI: 6500 (Spring '02)
SUBOMSIONS (Includes all 8" lines)
Fiscal Original Cost ENR- Replacment Useful Cumulative Replacement Cost
Year Capital Assets CCl (a) Cost Life Depreciation less Depreciation
1973 $ 119,464 1895 $ 409,n1 50 $ 67,471 $ 342,300
1976 $ 13,406 2401 $ 36,293 50 $ 6,834 $ 29,458
1978 $ 259,347 m6 $ 607,261 50 $ 120,876 $ 486,385
1979 $ 374,615 3003 $ 810,855 50 $ 166,777 $ 644,078
1980 $ 97,841 3237 $ 196,468 50 $ 37,Z18 $ 159,189
1981 $ 125,251 3535 $ 230,306 50 $ 52,236 $ 178,070
1982 $ 119,260 3825 $ 202,664 50 $ 47,729 $ 154,935
1983 $ 82,063 4066 $ 131,188 50 :$ 31,196 :$ 99,992
1984 $ 126,694 4146 $ 198,628 50 :$ 45,112 $ 153,516
1985 $ 399,191 4195 $ 618,532 50 $ 135,7Z1 $ 482,804
1986 $ 50,913 4295 $ 77,051 50 $ 16,070 $ 60,981
1987 $ 216,469 4406 :$ 319,348 50 $ 63,952 $ 255,396
1988 $ 131,954 4519 $ 189,799 50 :$ 35,026 $ 154,m
1989 $ 83,045 4615 $ 116,965 50 $ 19,932 $ 97,033
1990 $ 826,722 4732 $ 1,135,607 50 $ 195,630 $ 939,977
1991 $ 333,757 4835 $ 448,691 50 $ 72,801 $ 375,889
1992 :$ 1,583,551 4985 $ 2,064,811 50 $ 316,219 $ 1.748,592
1993 $ 369,220 5210 $ 460,639 50 $ 59,698 $ 400,941
1994 $ 1,415,693 5408 $ 1,701 ,554 50 $ 203,947 $ 1,497,608
1995 $ 740,536 5471 $ 879,618 50 $ 90,796 $ 789,022
1996 $ 912,558 5620 $ 1 ,055,450 50 $ 94,144 $ 961 ,305
1997 :$ 1,749,302 5826 $ 1,951,676 50 :$ 139 ,820 $ 1,811,856
1993 $ 2,098,656 5920 $ 2,304,267 50 $ 135,205 $ 2,169,062
1999 $ 1,770,876 6060 $ 1,899,454 50 $ 77,114 $ 1,822,340
2000 $ 1,980,906 6221 $ 2,069,746 50 $ 50,009 $ 2,019,737
2001 $ 1,240,436 6342 $ 1 ,271 ,339 50 $ 11,039 $ 1,260,301
$ 17,221,725 :$ 21,388,180 $ 2,292,639 $ 19,095,541
CITY PROJECTS
Fiscal Original Cost ENR- Replacment Useful Cumulative Replacement Cost
Year Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Life Depreciation Less Depreciation
1978 $ 272,792 2776 $ 638,742 50 $ 110,029 :$ 528,713
1979 :$ 2,309,310 3003 $ 4,998,506 50 $ 1 ,002,215 $ 3,996,292
1980 $ 1,916 3237 $ 3,847 50 :$ 722 $ 3,125
1981 3535 :$ 50 $
1987 4406 $ 50 $
1990 4732 $ 50 $
1991 4835 $ 50 $
1992 4975 :$ 50 :$
1993 5210 :$ 50 $
1994 5408 $ 50 $
1995 5471 $ 50 $
1996 :$ 797,182 5620 $ 922,008 50 :$ 85,883 :$ 836,125
1997 :$ 5826 $ 50 :$
1998 $ 304,249 5867 $ 337,075 50 $ 35,182 $ 301,894
1999 $ 170,410 6060 $ 182,783 50 $ 7,876 $ 174,906
2000 $ 6221 $ 50 $
2001 $ 177.545 6342 $ 181,969 50 $ 1,222 $ 180,747
2002 $ 64$,837 6500 $ 646,837 50 $ $ 646,837
$ 4,680,242 $ 7,911,768 $ 1,243,129 $ 6,668,639
TOTAL COLLECTION: $ 21 ,901.968 $ 29,299,948 $ 3,535,767 $ 25,764.180
81612002
Page 1 of 1
,",,-
(IX ~; ( APPENOlX 5F
'"; <. Page 1 or5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccDeprAmt ERN-CCI Cost Act.Deprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT per Acctg
16505 1973 SL - MEADOW VIEW #1 $119,464 $67,471 1,895 $409,771 $342,300 $2,389
16505 1976 SL - NORTH GATE SUB #3 $13,406 $6,834 2,401 $36,293 $29,458 $268
16505 1978 SL . CHERRY LANE VILLAGE #1 $126.622 559,503 2,776 5296,485 $236,982 $2,532
16505 1978 SL . CHERRY LANE VILLAGE #2 578,903 $36,557 2,776 $184,751 $148,194 51,578
16505 1978 SL - GLENFIELD MANOR #1 $53,822 $24,815 2,776 $126,024 $101,209 $1,076
16505 1979 SL - FRANKLIN SQUARE 547,128 $21,216 3,003 5102,009 580,793 $943
16505 1979 SL-CRESnNOODESTATES 525,329 $11,660 3,003 $54,825 $43,165 $507
16505 1979 SL - SUNNYBROOK FARMS #1 $22,170 $9,821 3,003 $47,987 $38,166 $443
16505 1979 SL - SUNNYBROOK FARMS #2 $67.790 $30,043 3,003 $146,732 5116,688 $1,356
16505 1979 SL - GLENFIELD MANOR #2 $61,774 $27,377 3,003 $133.710 5106,333 $1,235
165D5 1979 SL - CHERRY LANE EXT $99,857 $44.267 3,D03 $216,141 $171,873 $1,997
16505 1979 SL - RYAN PLACE $11,956 $5,278 3,DD3 525,879 520,60D $239
16505 1979 SL - GLENFIELD MANOR EXT $38,611 $17,114 3,003 $83,574 $66,46D S772
16505 1980 SL. TERROR SUBDIVISION $4,250 $1,813 3,237 $8,534 $6.721 $85
16505 1980 SL - MERIDIAN PARK ADD $54,529 $24,001 3,237 $1D9,496 $85,495 $1,091
165D5 1980 SL - MERIDIAN MEADOW fJ6 $25,958 $6,228 3,237 $52,124 $45,896 $519
16505 1980 SL - HUNTER ESTATES $13,1D4 $5,236 3,237 $26,313 $21,077 S262
16505 1981 SL . MERIDIAN PARK #1 552,584 $21,740 3,535 $96,689 $74,949 $1,D52
16505 1981 SL- MEADOW VIEW #2 $71,450 $3D,OD9 3,535 $131,379 $1 D1 ,37D 51,429
16505 1981 SL - CUSTOM BUILDERS $1 ,217 $487 3,535 $2,238 $1 ,751 $24
16505 1982 SL. MERIDIAN INO PARK NW $525 S23D 3,825 $892 S663 $11
165D5 1982 SL . LOCUST GROVE I NO PARK $67,000 $26,80D 3,825 $113,856 $87,056 $1,340
165D5 1982 SL - MERIDIAN MANOR #3 $51,735 $20,699 3,825 $87,916 $67 ,217 $1 ,D35
16505 1983 SL - MERIDIAN PHOE #1 $54,528 $2D,728 4,D66 $87,170 $66,442 $1,091
16505 1983 SL . SETTlERS VILLAGE NW 527,535 510,468 4,066 $44,018 533,55D $551
16505 1984 SL - MERIDIAN PLACE PH I $52,996 $19,080 4,146 583,086 564,D06 51,060
16505 1984 SL - W LAWN SUB PHASE I $18,698 56,732 4,146 $29,314 $22,582 $374
16505 1964 SL - SUNNYBROOK #3 $3D, DOO $10,800 4,146 $47,033 $36,233 $60D
16505 1984 SL . THE LAKE ~ CHERRY LANE $25,000 $8.500 4,146 $39,194 530,694 $500
165D5 1985 SL - SUNNYBROOK #4 529,058 $9,877 4,195 $45, D24 $35,147 $581
16505 1985 SL - TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS P, $370,133 5125,850 4,195 $573,508 $447,658 $7,403
16505 1988 SL - THE WILLOWS $9,929 $3,183 4,295 $15,026 $11,844 $199
16505 1986 SL - MERIDIAN PARK $29,405 $9,408 4,295 $44,501 $35,093 $588
16505 1986 SL - MERIDIAN MANOR #4 511,579 $3,479 4,295 $17,524 $14,D45 $232
165D5 1987 SL . THE LAKE @ CHERRY LANE #2 $26,462 57,936 4,406 539,038 $31,103 5529
165D5 1987 SL - FREEWAY EXT 5177,791 $53,339 4,406 $262.288 $208,949 $3,556
16505 1987 SL - FULLER PROJECT 512,216 $2,677 4,406 518, D22 $15,345 $244
16505 1988 SL - CARL TON AND EAST 1 ST $17,149 $4,802 4,519 $24,667 $19,865 $343
16505 1988 SL . MERIDIAN MANOR #5 518,805 $5,264 4,519 $27,049 521,784 $376
16505 1988 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS $96,000 $24,960 4,519 $138,084 $113,124 $1,92D
16505 1989 SL - CRESnNOOD f#4 $83, D45 519,932 4,615 5116,965 $97,D33 $1 ,661
16505 1990 SL - 10 MILE RD $84,OD1 $20,16D 4,732 $115,386 $95,226 $1,68D
16505 1990 SL - 10 MILE SEWER 5385,687 $92,567 4,732 $529,79D 5437,223 $7,714
16505 1990 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW $51,871 $12,445 4,732 $71,251 $58,8D6 51,037
165D5 1990 SL - CHERRY LN VILLAGE $56,024 $12,321 4,732 576,956 $64,635 $1,120
16505 1990 SL - CLARINDA FOUR $43,160 $10,357 4,732 559,286 $48,929 5863
16505 199D SL . CRESlWOOD #5 59,375 $2,255 4,732 $12,878 $10,623 $188
16505 1990 SL - DUNTEN PLACe $33,854 $7,447 4,732 $46,503 $39,056 $677
16505 1990 SL - GEM PARK SUB $21,000 $5,040 4,732 528,846 $23,806 $42D
16505 1990 SL - GLENFIELD #3 $19,865 $4.765 4,732 $27,287 $22,522 5397
165D5 1990 SL . GLENFIELD #4 $23,273 $5,116 4,732 531,968 $26,852 5465
165D5 1990 SL - GOLF VIEW EST $40,286 $9,867 4,732 $55,338 $45,671 $806
16505 199D SL - MERIDIAN GREENS #3 $33,12D $7,945 4,732 $45,495 $37,549 $662
16505 1990 SL. CRESnNOOO $25,206 55,544 4,732 $34,624 $29,079 $5D4
16505 1991 SL - LANDING # 1 $55,783 $12,275 4,835 $74,993 $62,718 $1,116
16505 1991 SL . GLENFIELD #5 $14,860 53,268 4,835 $19,977 $16,710 $297
16505 1991 SL - GLENFIELD #6 $15,620 $3,433 4,835 $20,999 517,566 $312
165D5 1991 SL - DUNTEN PL #2 $26,696 $5,874 4,835 $35,889 $30,015 $534
165D5 1991 SL . MISTY MEADOW #2 522,172 $4,874 4,835 529,807 $24,933 $443
16505 1991 SL - CENTRAL VALLEY #2 $4a,552 510,681 4,835 $65,272 $54,590 5971
16505 1991 SL- CHATEAU MEADOW #2 $24,626 55,422 4,835 $33,106 $27,685 $493
16505 1991 SL. CHATEAU MEAOOW #1 $21,445 $4,719 4,835 $28,830 $24,111 $429
16505 1991 SL - CHATEAU MEAOOW #5 $33,805 $7,436 4,835 $45,446 $38.010 $676
16505 1991 SL - CHATEAU MEAOOW #6 $12,786 $2,815 4,835 $17,189 $14,374 $256
16505 1991 SL - MISTY MEADOWS #1 526,210 $5,765 4,835 $35,236 $29,471 $524
165D5 1991 SL - MERRYlNOOD #1 $31 ,202 $6,240 4,835 $41 ,947 $35,7D7 $624
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST #1 553,649 $10,730 4,985 569,954 $59,224 51,073
16505 1992 SL - HAVEN COVE #1 $58,671 $11,242 4,985 $76,502 $65,260 $1,173
16505 1992 SL - T LANDING #2 $34,479 $6,899 4,985 $44,958 $38,059 $690
16505 1992 SL - T LANDING #3 $28,D60 55,611 4,985 $36,588 $30,977 $561
16505 1992 SL - TRACT SUB #1 $95,330 $19,069 4,985 5124,3D2 $1 D5,233 $1.907
16505 1992 SL . KEARNEY PL #1 $26,723 $5,341 4,985 534,844 $29,503 $534
8/6120D2
sewer&wMp assets
FEE SUMMARY 3-6.02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 2 of5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccOeprAmt ERN-CCl Cost Act.Oeprec. AnnOepr
SEWER DEPT per Aeclg
16505 1992 SL - MIRAGE MEADOWS $41,198 $8,240 4,985 $53,719 $45,479 $824
16505 1992 SL - GLENFIELO #4 PHASE2 $4,863 $971 4,985 $6,341 $5,370 $97
16505 1992 SL - GLENFIELD #7 $19,553 $3.910 4,985 $25.495 $21,585 $391
16505 1992 SL - GLENFIELD #8 $18,460 $3,691 4,985 $24,070 $20,360 $369
16505 1992 SL - GLENFIELD #9 $36,876 $7,379 4,985 $48,083 $40,704 $738
16505 1992 SL-GEMPARK#2 $27,907 $5,580 4,985 $36,388 $30,808 $558
16505 1992 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW 1M $4,278 $859 4,985 $5,578 $4,719 $86
16505 1992 SL - CHATEAU MEADOW #6 $33,549 $6,710 4,985 $43,745 $37,035 $671
16505 1992 SL - CRYSTAL SRPINGS #1 $24,220 $4,841 4,985 $31,581 $26,740 $484
16505 1992 SL - CRYSTAL SPRINGS #2 $29,000 $5.800 4,985 $37,813 $32,013 $580
16505 1992 SL - HON-DAIRY GUEON $34,370 $6,871 4,985 $44,815 $37,944 $687
16505 1992 SL - MEADOWS GREENS #2 $135,223 $27,041 4,985 $176,319 $149,277 $2,704
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST #2 $22,683 $4,539 4,985 $29,577 $25,038 $454
16505 1992 SL - SUNBURST U3 $21,702 $4,340 4,985 $28,297 $23,957 $434
16505 1992 SL - DEERFIELD SUB $18,362 $3,669 4,985 $23,942 $20,274 $367
16505 1992 SL - MERIDIAN MANOR #7 $43,250 $8,650 4,985 $56,394 $47,7 44 $865
16505 1992 SL. CHERRY LN U3 B & C $56,663 $11,331 4,985 $73,884 $62,553 $1,133
16505 1992 SL - WATERBURY PARK #1 $23,250 $4,650 4,985 $30,316 $25,666 $465
16505 1992 SL - VINEYARDS #1 $57,878 $11,579 4,985 $75,468 $63,889 $1,158
16505 1992 SL - ONE SUB #3 $37,000 $7,400 4,985 $48,245 $40,845 $740
16505 1992 SL - TRACT SUB #2 $39,004 $7,800 4,985 $50,858 $43,058 $780
16505 1992 SL - KEARNEY PLACE #2 $28,343 $5,270 4,985 $34,349 $29,079 $527
16505 1992 SL - CANDLELIGI-ff SUB #1 $36,967 $7,391 4,985 5A8,202 $40,811 $739
16505 1992 SL . MERIDIAN PLACE #3 $46,150 $9,230 4,985 $60,176 $50,946 $923
16505 1992 SL - MERRYWOOD #2 $23,531 $4,709 4,985 $30,682 $25.973 $471
16505 1992 SL - SO. SLOUGH LINE $249,735 $49,949 4,985 $325,632 $275,683 $4.995
16505 1992 SL - N. MERIDIAN ROAD $171,226 $34,249 4,985 $223,264 $189,015 $3,425
16505 1992 SL - ADD 10 MILE SEWER $3,398 $680 4,985 $4,431 $3,751 $68
16505 1993 SL - HAVEN COVE #2 $55,876 $9,502 5,210 $69,711 $60,209 $1,118
16505 1993 SL - VINEYARD #3 $36,884 $6,026 5,210 $46,017 $39,990 $738
16505 1993 SL - PARKWOOD MEADOW #2 $19,617 $3,170 5,210 $24,474 $21,304 $392
16505 1993 SL - PARKWOOD MEADOWS #1 $51,238 $8,284 5,210 $63,925 $55,640 $1,025
16505 1993 SL - LANDING SUB #5 $29,822 $4,819 5,210 $37,206 $32,387 $596
16505 1993 SL - LOCUST GROVE S LINE EXT $22,089 $3,535 5,210 $27,558 $24,023 $442
16505 1993 SL - HUNTER GLEN APTS $16,114 $2.577 5,210 $20,104 $17,527 $322
16505 1993 SL - TRACT SUB #3 $45,079 $7,139 5,210 $56,241 $49,102 $902
16505 1993 SL . SUNNYBROOK #5 $34,438 $5,453 5,210 $42,965 $37,512 S689
16505 1993 SL - LANDING #6 $35,671 $5,646 5,210 $44,503 $38,857 5713
16505 1993 SL - KEARNEY PLACE U3 $22,392 $3,547 5,210 $27,936 $24,390 $448
16505 1994 SL - CHERRY LANE #4 $27,732 $4,300 5,408 $33,332 $29,032 $555
16505 1994 SL - CANDLELIGHT #2 $43,407 $6,727 5,408 $52,172 545,444 5868
16505 1994 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS #1 558,207 $9,021 5,408 $69,960 $60,939 $1,164
16505 1994 SL - VINEYARDS #4 $36,024 $5.581 5,408 $43,298 $37,717 $720
16505 1994 SL - WATERBURY #2 $27,632 $4,192 5,408 $33,212 $29,020 $553
16505 1994 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS #2 $32,289 $4,790 5,408 $38,809 $34,019 $646
16505 1994 SL - SPORTSMAN POtNTE #3 $51,279 $7,608 5,408 $61,633 $54,026 $1,026
16505 1994 SL - MIER MANOR #8 $34,945 $5,184 5,408 $42.001 $36,818 $699
16505 1994 SL - WINGATE #1 $19,030 $2,793 5,408 $22,873 520,080 $381
16505 1994 SL - SADDLE VIEW #1 $77,350 $11,345 5,408 $92,969 $81,624 $1,547
16505 1994 SL . HAVEN COVE #3 555,821 $8,185 5,408 $67,093 $58,907 $1,116
16505 1994 SL - SUMMERFIELD #1 $177,287 $25,707 5,408 5213,085 $187,378 53,546
16505 1994 SL - CROSSROADS #1 $90,678 $12,999 5,408 $108,988 $95,989 $1,814
16505 1994 SL . TRACT SUB #4 $126,809 $17,964 5,408 $152,415 $134,451 $2,536
16505 1994 SL - S SLOUGH LINE $207,561 $29,404 5,408 $249,472 $220,069 $4,151
16505 1994 SL - FENVlJAY #2 $33,934 $4,809 5,408 $40,786 $35,977 $679
16505 1994 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE 1M $69,050 $9,552 5,408 $82.993 $73,441 $1,381
16505 1994 SL. VINEYARDS #5 $44,528 $6,161 5,408 $53.519 $47,359 $891
16505 1994 SL - FOTHERGILL POINTE #1 $80,000 $10,933 5,408 $96,154 $85,221 $1.600
16505 1994 SL - CANDLELIGHT #3 $44,540 $6,087 5,408 $53,534 $47,446 $891
16505 1994 SL - FENVlJAY PARK #3 $10,583 $1,447 5,408 $12,720 $11,273 $212
16505 1994 SL - CROSSROADS #2 $38,206 $5,221 5,408 $45,921 540,699 $764
16505 1994 SL - MANHOLES $28,801 $3,936 5,408 $34,617 $30,681 $576
16505 1995 SL - WATERBURY #4 $22,503 $2,962 5,471 $26,735 $23,773 $450
16505 1995 SL - MERIDIAN ST $69,706 $9,177 5,471 $82,816 $73,639 $1,394
16505 1995 SL - CHERRY LANE $4,537 $590 5,471 $5,390 $4.800 $91
16505 1995 SL - PIEDMONT $24.060 $3,087 5,471 $28,585 $25,499 $481
16505 1995 SL - DANBURY FAIR #3 $38,054 $4,883 5,471 $45,211 $40,328 $761
16505 1995 SL - DANBURY 1M $59,286 $7,510 5,471 $70,437 $62,927 $1,186
16505 1995 SL - LOCUST GROVE STUBS $5,600 $691 5,471 $6,653 $5,962 $112
16505 1995 SL - HAVEN COVE 1M $45,704 65,636 5,471 $54,300 $48,664 $914
16505 1995 SL - FIELDSTONE #3 $54,376 $6,527 5,471 $64,603 658,077 $1,088
16505 1995 SL - FOTHERGILL POINTE #2 $85,501 $10,260 5,471 6101,582 $91,322 $1,710
8/612002
sewer&\\>Wlp assel6
FEE SUMMARY3-6-02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 3 of 5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccOeprAmt ERN-CC1 Cost Act.Deprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT per Acctg
16505 1995 SL . TRACT #5A $31,361 $3,763 5.471 $37,259 $33,497 $627
16505 1995 SL . LJ\.KE @ CHERRY LJ\.NE ff3 $95,100 $11.412 5,471 $112,987 $101,575 $1,902
16505 1995 SL-NAVARRO $41,366 $4,963 5.471 $49,146 $44,183 $827
16505 1995 SL . BEDFORD PLACE #1 $99,248 $11,745 5,471 $117.915 $106.170 $1,985
16505 1995 SL . CANNA LILLY $16,794 $1,988 5,471 $19,953 $17,965 $336
16505 1995 SL. SUMMERFIELD #2 $47,340 $5,602 5,471 $56,244 $50,641 $947
16505 1996 SL. AVEST PLAZA $39,428 $4,207 5,620 $45,602 $41,395 $789
16505 1996 SL . CHAMBERLAIN #1 $54,271 $5,788 5,620 $62,769 $56,981 $1,085
16505 1996 SL . DANBURY #5 $38,091 $4, 190 5,620 $44,055 $39,865 $762
16505 1996 SL . DANBURY #7 $102,567 $10,256 5,620 $118,627 $108,371 $2,051
16505 1996 SL . FIELDSTONE #4 $40,303 $4.164 5,620 $46.614 $42,450 $806
18507 1996 SL - FIELDSTONE #5 SUB $52,199 $5,046 5,620 $60,373 $55,327 $1,044
16507 1996 SL - FIELDSTONE MEADOWS #4 $40,303 $4,030 5,620 $46.614 $42,584 $806
16505 1996 SL . HAVEN COVE #5 $44,785 $4,628 5,820 $51,798 $47.169 $896
16505 1996 SL - HAVEN COVE #6 $6,815 $704 5,620 $7,882 $7,178 $136
18505 1996 SL . LJ\. PLJ\.YA $62,938 $6,818 5,620 $72,793 $65,975 $1,259
16505 1996 SL - LJ\.NDING SEWER LIFT STATION $6,898 $678 5,620 $7,978 $7,300 $138
16505 1996 SL . LOS ALJ\.MITOS #2A $97.450 $10,232 5,620 $112,709 $102,477 $1,949
16505 1996 SL . MANHOLE ON BROADWAY AND 3 $9,175 $887 5,620 $10,612 $9,725 $184
16505 1996 SL - MER. BUSINESS PARK #2 $59,363 $6,332 5,620 $68,658 $62,326 $1,187
16505 1996 SL - MIDTOWN SQUARE $46,500 $5,038 5,620 $53,781 $48,743 $930
16505 1996 SL . SALMON RAPIDS #1 $92,500 $9,250 5,620 $106,984 $97,734 $1,850
16505 1996 SL . SALMON RAPIDS #2 $89,500 $8,950 5,620 $103,514 $94,564 $1,790
16505 1996 SL . TRACT #58 $29,472 $2,946 5,620 $34,087 $31,141 $589
16505 1997 SL - CARTLTON STREET SEWERLlNE $9,196 $705 5,825 $10,262 $9,557 $184
16507 1997 SL . FOTHERGILL POINTE SUB #3 $22,285 $1,968 5,825 $24,867 $22,899 $446
16507 1997 SL - RAILSIDE PARK SUB $37,197 $3,162 5,825 $41,507 $38,348 $744
16507 1997 SL - SUMMERFIELD #2 SUB $47,340 $4,024 5,825 $52,826 $48,801 $947
16507 1997 SL. SUMMERFIELD SUB #3B $31,599 $2,633 5,825 $35,261 $32,628 $632
16507 1997 SL. CHAMBERLAINE ESTATES #1 $58,777 $4,703 5,825 $65,588 $60,885 $1,176
16507 1997 SL . CHAM8ERLAINE ESTATES #2 $54,271 $4,342 5,825 $60.560 $56,218 $1,085
16507 1997 SL. CHAPPARRAL HEM SCHOOL $6,944 $556 5,825 $7,749 $7,193 $139
16507 1997 SL . CROSSROADS ff3 $40,788 $3,263 5,825 $45,515 $42,251 $816
16507 1997 SL - CROSSROADS #4 $31,908 $2,552 5,825 $35,605 $33.053 $638
16507 1997 SL - DANBURY FAIR #7 $102,567 $8,205 5,825 $114,452 $106.247 $2,051
16507 1997 SL . DOVE MEADOWS #2 $47,000 $3,760 5,825 $52,446 $48,686 $940
16507 1997 SL . ENGLEWOOD CREEK #1 $59,626 $4,771 5,825 $66,535 $61 ,765 $1,193
16507 1997 SL . FINCH CREEK PH 2 537,619 $3,009 5,825 $41,978 $38,969 $752
16507 1997 SL. FIRELIGHT ESTATES $30,074 $2,405 5,825 $33,559 $31.154 $601
16507 1997 SL - HAVEN COVE #58 $33,606 $2,688 5,825 $37,500 $34,812 $672
16507 1997 SL - KENTFIELD MANOR #2 $30,395 $2,432 5,825 $33,917 $31,485 $608
16507 1997 SL . LANDINGS 119 $69.067 $5.525 5,825 $77,070 $71,545 $1,381
16507 1997 SL. LOS ALAMITOS #28 $6,000 $480 5,825 $6,695 $6,215 $120
16507 1997 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS #3 $37,197 $2,976 5,825 $41,507 $38,532 $744
16507 1997 SL . MORNING GLORY #2 $52,153 $4.172 5,825 $58,196 $54,024 $1,043
16507 1997 SL. RAVIN HILL #1 $55,734 $4,459 5,825 $62,192 $57.733 $1,115
16507 1997 SL - SALMON RAPIDS ff3 $71,748 $5,740 5,825 $80,062 $74,322 $1 ,435
16507 1997 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE #5 $52,112 $4,169 5.825 $58,151 $53,982 $1,042
16507 1997 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE #6 $26,877 $2,151 5,625 $29,992 $27,841 $538
16507 1997 SL - STRATFORD PLAZA #1 $10.761 $861 5,825 $12,008 $11,147 $215
16507 1997 SL - SUMMERFIELD fJ3A $74,906 $5,992 5,825 $83.586 $77,594 $1,498
16507 1997 SL . TUTHILL #2 $59,603 $4,768 5,825 $66,510 $61,742 $1,192
16507 1997 SL - WATERBURY PARK #5 $57,065 $4,565 5,825 $63,678 $59,113 $1,141
16507 1997 SL. WHITESTONE #1 $178,025 $14,243 5,825 $198,655 $184,412 $3,561
16507 1997 SL. WINGATE PLACE #2 $60,800 $4,864 5,825 $67.845 $62,981 $1,216
16507 1997 SL . LOS ALAMITOS #3 $88,700 $6,946 5,825 $98,979 $92,031 $1,774
16507 1997 SL - BEDFORD PLACE #3 $36,627 $2,870 5,825 $40,871 $38,002 $733
16507 1997 SL - CROSSROADS #5 $33,191 $2,544 5,825 $37,037 $34,493 $664
16507 1997 SL - TUMBLE CREEK #1 $97.544 $7,316 5,825 $108.847 $101,532 $1,951
16505 1998 SL - WASHINGTON AND 2ND SEWERL $4,798 $352 5.920 $5,268 $4,916 $96
16507 1998 SL . ASHFORD GREENS #2 $133,818 $9,813 5,920 $148,929 $137,115 $2.676
16507 1998 SL " BEDFORD PLJ\.CE #4 $35,679 $2,141 5,920 $39,175 $37,034 $714
16507 1998 SL . Central Valley CoIp Park #6 Sewerli $64.847 $3,891 5,920 $71.201 $67.310 $1.297
16507 1998 SL . CROSSROADS #0 $36,019 $2,281 5.920 $39,548 $37,267 $720
16507 1998 SL - Crossroads #7 Sewenines $61,603 $3,491 5.920 $67,638 $64,148 $1 ,232
16507 1998 SL - Englewood Creek #2 Sewertines $63,113 $3,787 5,920 $69,296 $65,510 $1,262
16507 1998 SL - GRANITE CREEK $32,986 $2,254 5,920 $36,218 $33.964 $660
16507 1998 SL - Haven Cove #7 Sewertines $42,316 $2,539 5,920 $46,462 $43,923 $846
16507 1998 SL . LJ\.KE @ CHERRY LANE #5 $247,200 $18,128 5,920 $271,419 $253,291 $4,944
16507 1998 SL . LAKE @ CHERRY LANE #fj $51,200 $3,584 5,920 $56,216 $52,632 $1.024
16507 1998 SL . Lake@Cheny Lane #4, Ph#1 sewert $66,000 $3,960 5,920 $72,466 $68,506 $1,320
16507 1998 SL - Lake@Cheny Lane #7 sewertines $50,400 $3,024 5,920 $55,338 $52.314 $1,008
8/612002
sewer&wwtp assets
FEE SUMMARY 3-6.{)2
APPENDIX SF
Page 4 of 5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccOeprAmt ERN-CCI Cost ActDeprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT per Acctg
16507 1998 SL - MED1MONT $96,099 $6,727 5,920 $105,514 $98,787 $1,922
16507 1998 SL - Meridian Greens 113 & #4 sewerlines $35.700 $2,083 5,920 $39,198 $37,115 $714
16507 1998 SL - MERIDIAN GREENS UNIT 3 PH VI $30,631 $2,246 5,920 $33,632 $31,386 $613
16507 1998 SL . Packard Sutxlivision #1 offsije $182,357 $10,637 5,920 $200,223 $189,586 $3,647
16507 1998 SL - Packard Sutxlivision #1 sewerlines $60,052 $3,503 5,920 $65,935 $62,432 $1,201
16507 1998 SL - Raven Hill #2 $28,432 $1,659 5,920 $31,218 $29,559 $569
16507 1998 SL - SALMON RAPIDS #4 $89,600 $6,123 5,920 $98,378 $92,255 $1,792
16505 1998 SL - Sewerline @ Locust Grove $5,497 $312 5,920 $6,036 $5,724 $110
16505 1998 SL . SewerUne Extension $3,252 $195 5,920 $3,571 $3,376 $65
16507 1998 SL - Sherbrooke Hollows #1 $242,095 $14,122 5,920 $265,814 $251,692 $4,842
16507 1998 SL - SPORTSMAN POINTE #7 $39,179 $2,677 5,920 $43,017 $40,341 $784
16507 1998 SL - SUMMERFIELD #5 $21,641 $1,587 5,920 $23,761 $22,174 $433
16507 1998 SL - TRAUTNER BUSINESS PARK $83,000 $6,087 5,920 $91,132 $85,045 $1,660
16507 1998 SL - Tumble Creek #2 $69,000 $4,140 5,920 $75,760 $71,620 $1,380
16507 1998 SL - TURNBERRY #1 $168,664 $10,120 5,920 $185,189 $175,069 $3,373
16507 1998 SL - WHlTESTONE $53,477 $3,744 5,920 $58,716 $54,973 $1 ,070
16505 1999 Sl - 5 Mile Griffin Sewerfine Extension $10,283 $463 6,060 $11,030 $10,567 $206
16507 1999 SL . Devlin Place Sewerfines $59,220 $3,257 6,060 $63,520 $60,263 $1,184
16505 1999 SL - Drainage @ Lake at Cherry Lane $1,350 $70 6,060 $1,448 $1,378 $27
16507 1999 SL - Econo-Lube Sutxlivision Seweslines $28,420 $1,516 6,060 $30,483 $28,968 $568
16507 1999 SL - Goffview Sewerfines $49,390 $2,140 6,060 $52,976 $50,836 $988
16507 1999 SL - Haven Cove #8 Seweslines $24,047 $1,122 6,060 $25,793 $24,671 $481
16507 1999 SL . Home Depot Sewerfine $2,800 $154 6,060 $3,003 $2,849 $56
16507 1999 SL - Honor Park #3 Ph#1 sewerfines $12,191 $589 6,060 $13,076 $12,487 $244
16507 1999 SL . Landing #10 sewerfines $36,182 $1,628 6,060 $36,809 $37,181 $724
16507 1999 SL . sterfing Creek $36,623 $1.831 6,060 $39.282 $37,451 $732
16507 1999 SL - Tel-Pae seweslines $3,600 $198 6,060 $3,861 $3,663 572
16507 1999 SL. Thousand Springs #1 $95,990 $4,160 6,080 $102,960 $98,800 $1,920
16507 ~999 SL . Thunder Creek $58,645 $2,737 6,060 $62,903 $60,166 $1,173
16507 1999 SL - Turtle Creek #1 $110,267 $4,594 6,060 $118,273 $113,679 $2,205
16507 1999 SL - Van Auker-Eagle Road Sewer $585,000 $27,300 6,060 $627,475 $600,1 75 $11,700
16507 1999 SL . Whiteslone Estates $11,980 $559 6,060 $12,850 $12,291 $240
16507 1999 SL . Ashford Greens #3 $43,191 $1,728 6,060 $46,326 $44,599 $864
16507 1999 SL . Chevron @ Eagle Road $6,535 $261 6,060 $7,009 56,748 $131
16507 1999 SL - Dakota Ridge #1 $34,503 $1,380 6,060 $37,008 $35.628 $690
16507 1999 SL . Family Center $59,900 $2,396 6,060 $64,249 $61,853 $1,198
16507 1999 SL . Sherbrooke Hollows #2 $49,195 $1,968 6,060 552,767 $50,799 $984
16507 1999 SL - Sherbrooke Hollows #3 $57,599 $2,304 6,060 $61,781 $59,477 $1,152
16507 1999 SL - Tumble Creek #:3 549,000 $1,960 6,080 $52.558 $50,598 $980
16507 1999 Sl . Whitestone Estates #3 $17,028 $681 6,060 $18,264 $17,583 $341
16507 1999 Sl - RC Willey $28,046 $1,122 6,060 $30,082 $28,961 5561
16507 1999 SL - Cherry Lane Village #5 Ph. B $45,776 $1,678 6,060 $49,100 $47,421 $916
16507 1999 SL - Thousand Springs #2 $63,800 $2,339 6,060 $68,432 $66,093 $1,276
16507 1999 SL . Lake@Cherry Lane #5 Phase B $164.800 $6,043 6,060 $176,766 $170,723 $3,296
16507 1999 SL . Central Drive ExtenSion to Jabil $25,515 $936 6,060 $27 ,368 $26,432 $510
16505 2000 SL - Five Mile Sewer Ext@184 & Overlanc $22,467 5749 6,221 $23,475 $22,726 $449
16505 2000 SL - Sewerfine ExtensIon @ WWTP In 2C $47,080 $1,020 6,221 $49,192 $48,172 $942
16505 2000 SL . Sewerfine Rehab @ Plaza $70,998 51,302 6,221 $74,182 $72,880 $1,420
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs Village $96,425 $3,375 6.221 $100,749 $97,375 $1,929
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs #4 514,430 $505 6,221 $15,077 $14,572 $289
16507 2000 SL . Holiday I nn Express - OlIsite $23,174 $811 6,221 $24,213 $23,402 $463
16507 2000 SL - Meridian RiverValley OlIsite Packar $24,960 $874 6,221 $26,079 $25,206 5499
16507 2000 SL - Brenda Estateslthe Villas $37,455 $1,249 6,221 $39,135 $37,886 $749
16507 2000 SL - Dakota Ridge #2 $34,561 $1,152 6,221 $36,111 $34,959 $691
16507 2000 SL - Packard #2 $13,710 $457 6,221 514.325 $13,868 $274
16507 2000 SL - Parkway Plaza $111,481 $3,716 6,221 $116,481 $112,765 52,230
16507 2000 SL - Landing #11 $35,686 $1,190 6,221 $37,286 536,097 $714
16507 2000 SL - Medimont #2 $18,604 5558 6,221 $19,439 $18,881 $372
16507 2000 SL - Deejay aka Murdoch $90,799 $2,724 6,221 $94,871 $92,1 47 $1,816
16507 2000 SL. Haven Cove #10 $7,910 5237 6,221 $8,265 58,027 $158
16507 2000 SL - Haven Cove #9 $29,508 $885 6,221 $30,831 $29,946 $590
16507 2000 SL - Mendian Charter High School $2,460 $74 6,221 $2,570 $2,497 $49
16507 2000 SL - Haven Cove #10. Pine St Extension $31,169 5935 6.221 $32,567 $31,632 $623
16507 2000 SL . Thousand Spnngs #5 $97,945 $2.775 6,221 $102,338 $99,563 $1,959
16507 2000 SL - Packard #3 536,832 $982 6,221 538,483 537,501 $737
16507 2000 SL - Maws Addijion #3 510,415 $278 6,221 $10,882 510,604 5208
16507 2000 SL - LOS Church @ Black Cat Rd $20,800 $520 6,221 $21 ,733 $21,213 $416
16507 2000 SL - Sherbrooke Hollows #4 $41,306 $1,033 6,221 $43.158 $42,125 $826
16507 2000 SL - Interstate Battery @ Franklin $9,050 $226 6,221 $9,456 $9,230 $181
16507 2000 SL - LOS Chureh @ Locust Grove $3,261 $76 6,221 $3,407 $3,331 $65
16507 2000 SL - Oakbrook Plaza $27,494 $642 6,221 $28,727 $28,085 $550
16507 2000 SL - Meridian Lewis&Clark Middle SChool $11,994 $260 6,221 $12,532 $12,272 $240
8/612002
sewer&v.wtp assets
FEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
APPENDIX 5F
Page 5 af5
Replacement
Replacement Cost less
AssetTypelD Year Description Cost AccDeprAmt ERN-CCJ Cost ActDeprec. AnnDepr
SEWER DEPT perAcctg
16507 2000 SL . Meridian Peregrine Elementary $15,472 $335 6,221 $16.166 $15,831 $309
16507 2000 SL - Whitestone Estates 1M $27,553 $597 6,221 $28,789 $28,192 $551
16507 2000 CC " Sue's Subdivision $30,251 $605 6,221 $31,608 $31,003 $605
16507 2000 CC - Vienna Woods Subd $231.689 $4,634 6,221 $242,080 $237,446 $4,634
16507 2000 CC- MidValley Business Park #1 $16,970 $339 6.221 $17,731 $17,392 $339
16507 2000 CC Oliason Park Subdivision $40,894 $818 6,221 $42,728 $41,910 $818
16507 2000 CC . Turtle Creek Subd $96,757 $1,935 6,221 $101,097 $99,161 $1,935
16507 2000 CC- Thousand Springs $97,945 $1,959 6,221 $102.338 $100,379 $1,959
16507 2000 CC Hartford Estates Subdivision $85,874 $1,574 6,221 $89,725 $88,151 $1,717
16507 2000 CC . Vienna Woods #1 Subd $60,792 $1,115 6,221 $63,518 $62,404 $1,216
16507 2000 CC - Vienna Woods #2 Subd $60,387 $1,107 6,221 $63,095 $61,988 $1,208
16507 2000 CC SI Lukes Road Ex! $13,350 $245 6,221 S13,949 S13,704 $267
16507 2000 SL - Thousand Springs #3 $125,040 S4,376 6,221 S130,648 S126,271 $2,501
16507 2000 CC - Tumble Creek Subd 1M S51,030 $851 6,221 $53,319 $52,468 S1,021
16507 2000 CC- Golf Vi€!# SUbdivision No 5 $32,540 $542 6,221 $33.999 $33,457 $651
16507 2000 SL- Ashford Greens 1M $22,388 $373 6,221 $23,392 $23,019 $448
16505 2001 Sewenine - Bews installed @ Ten Mile $57,750 $385 6,342 $59,189 S58,804 $1,155
16507 2001 CC . Butte Fence $6,832 $57 6.342 $7,002 $6,945 $137
16507 2001 CC . Creekside Arbour Apts Phase 2 $62,000 $930 6,342 $63,545 $62,615 $1,240
16507 2001 CC - Edinburgh Place S80,502 $537 6,342 S82,508 $81,971 $1,610
16507 2001 CC . Honor Park Subdivision No 3A $42,501 $213 6,342 $43,560 $43,347 $850
16507 2001 CC - Penn Station Apartments $18,258 $61 6,342 $18,713 $18,652 $365
16507 2001 CC - Resolution Subdivision $78,018 $520 6,342 $79,962 $79,442 $1.560
16507 2001 CC - Scottsdale Subvision $18,489 $92 6,342 $18,950 $18,857 $370
16507 2001 CC . Snorting Bull Subd Phase #1 Ioopc. $304,137 S4,562 6,342 $311,714 $307,151 $6,083
16507 2001 CC . Tarawood $33,055 $165 6,342 $33,879 $33,714 $661
16507 2001 CC . The Lakes @ Cheny Lane #9 Subd $24,949 $208 6,342 $25,571 S25,363 $499
16507 2001 CC . Tremont Subd- North $93,358 $622 6,342 $95,684 $95,061 $1,867
16507 2001 CC - Tumble Cre€k Sub #5 & 6 S86,880 S290 6,342 S89,044 S88,755 S1,738
16507 2001 CC - Tumbeny Subd #2 S75,170 $1,002 6,342 $77,042 $76,040 $1,503
16507 2001 CC . Vienna Woods #3 $54,022 S180 6,342 $55,368 $55,188 $1.080
16507 2001 CC . Vienna Woods 1M $32,714 S55 6,342 $33,529 $33,474 $654
16507 2001 CC . Wesley Sub seweriines $28,856 $192 6,342 $29,575 $29,383 $577
16507 2001 CC - Wilkins Ranch $92,360 $462 6,342 $94,660 S94,199 $1,847
16507 2001 CC . Woodhaven Subd S50,585 $506 6,342 $51,845 S51,339 $1,012
$17,221,725 $2,292,639 $21,368,515 $19,095,876 $344,435
City . Collection System
60.lmprv-ww CC 1976 Improve - Sewer Rehab (grant) S272,792 S110,029 2,776 $638,742 S528,713 $5,456
60-Sewlines CC 1979 SL - SEWER L1NES-GRANT S2,309,310 $1,002,215 3,003 $4,998,506 S3,996,292 $46,186
60-lmprv-WW CC 1980 Improve. Sewer Rehab $1,916 $722 3,237 $3,847 S3,125 $38
60-Seweriines 1996 SL - FIVE MILE DRAIN $739,692 $80,134 5,620 $855,516 $775,382 S14,794
60.Seweriines 1996 SL - GREGORY SEWER LIFT STATION $57,490 S5,749 5,620 S66.492 $60,743 S2,875
60-lIft 1998 Pump - ASHFORD GREENS LIFT STAll $300,997 S35,117 5,867 $333,472 $298,355 $30,100
60-Seweriines 1998 SL - SewerlJne ExtenSion $3,252 $65 5,867 $3,603 $3,538 $65
60-Lilt 1999 Pump - Replace Lift Pump $9,602 $640 6,060 $10,299 $9,659 $960
60-Sewerlines 1999 SL - Franklin Road Sewerline S160,808 $7,236 6,060 S172,484 S165,247 $3,216
60-Seweriines 2001 SL . Sewerline @ WWTP Plant $122,170 $1,222 6,342 $125,213 $123,992 $2,443
60-CIP.WWTP 2001 CIP - Five Mile Sewer Trunk Relief $55,376 $0 6,342 $56,755 $56,755 $1,108
60-Clp.WWTP 2002 CIP . White Drain Sewer Trunk $43,732 $0 6,500 $43,732 $43,732 $875
60-C1P-WWTP 2002 CIP . 2001 Sewerline While Drain Trunk S4,350 $0 6,500 S4,350 $4,350 $87
60.CIP.WWTP 2002 CIP - 2001 Seweriine Improvement@LocI S5,711 $0 6,500 $5,711 S5.711 S114
60.CIP.WWTP 2002 CIP - 2001 Seweriine Five Mile Relier $530,767 $0 6,500 $530,767 $530,767 $10,615
60-CIP-WWTP 2002 2001 South Slough Sewer Trunk/ine Ext $62,278 $0 6.500 $62,278 $62,278 $1,246
S4,680,242 S1 ,243,129 $89,294 $7,911.768 S6,668,639 $120,177
8/612002
sewer&wwtp assets
FEE SUMMARY 3-6.Q2
81912002
WATER e.v-
Waler legal Costs
C8pIlll Cost (\lO doIan<)
-6)'$.
C8pltaI Cost
~1)
VOOf f'OO<lolo:r>; x 1.000 Total x 1.000 SeheO.Jed
2000 S400 S400 Waterloo ProIecl Ph 2
$200 $200 Mre Web SIGna. Research. Watl!<' Rllt1ls
$45 $9 $54 Wel16 Gerlem1co"
&t>lolat SlbtoIaI: SSM
2001 S400 S80 $492 Wel21 Creplaces WeI No. 111
$200 $200 Il-lvlhuIc Model Updale
S400 S80 $480 Wel22 CBearCl'cekl
$500 Worte<loe Prolecl (dos<lloopsl
SlCJIotnI: SlbtoIaI: $lln
2002 $800 $HiO $1,(108 Web 23 & 24 CMcMllal1. 10M1le 10 loros1 Grovel
$1.500 $300 $1.890 Walertne ProlecI (dose Ioopsl
SlCJIotnI: StDmlal: $2.B9B
2000 1IYOIJ9'l2002; S4, 724
2003 $200 $oW $240 $248 MlsceIaroaus
S400 S80 $480 $492 Wel25
$400 S80 S4&l $492 Wel26
StDmlal: StOIotol: 51 23{l
2004 S400 S80 $4lI() $504 Wel26
$500 $100 $6O(l $630 Wale< LIne Looo CIosu"es
SlbtoIaI: StDmlal: $1134
2005 $200 $40 $240 $25S Mlscelaneous
$WIotnI; SI..tIlotaI: $258
2006 $1.500 $30() $1.800 $1.980 Reservoir #3 CSOUIIl of I-lI4l. Wel27
SO
$500 $100 $660 Water LIne l.oop CIosu"es
soototaI: SlbtoIaI; $2.840
2007 S400 S80 $4lI() I $540 welze
SlCJIotnI: SlbtotaI: $SW
200e $200 $oW $240 I $276 MISGeIaneoUs
$500 $100 $600 I $690 Water LIne LO<:Ill CIostres
SlCJIotnI: S<DlcInI: $966
2009 S400 S80 $480 I $5&1 Wel29
I
swtolaI: SlCJIotnI: $564
2010 S400 S80 $4lI() I $576 Wel30
$500 $100 $600 I $720 Wale( line Loop CIostres
SlbtoIaI: S<blolaI: $1 296
2011 S350 $70 $420 $515 MlsceIaooous
5Wlo1aJ: SlbtoIaI: $515
2012 $200 $oW $240 $30() Mlsce!ar>eoos
$500 $100 $600 $7&) Water Une LO<:Ill aosu-es
StDmlal: SlbtotaI: 51 lI8II
2013 S400 S80 $480 $61Z Wel31
StbIolat S<blolaI; $612
2014 $200 $oW $240 I $312 Misulaneous
$500 $100 $6O(l ! $780 Waw LIne l.oop CIostres
S<blolaI: S<blolaI: $1 092
2015 $200 $oW $240 I $318 MlsuIaneous
S<blolaI: S<DlcInI: $318
2016 $400 S80 $4&) I $&W Wel32
$500 $100 $600 I $810 Wsw Une l.oop CIosu"es
&btolal: S<blolaI: $IMS
2017 $200 $oW $240 I $330 MlsceIaneoos
Slbtolal; Sl.blo!at $330
2018 $200 $40 $240 I $336 Mls<:eIaooous
$500 $100 $600 I $840 _l.lne Loop CIostres
S<blolaI: SlbtotaI: $1178
2019 $400 S80 $4lIO I $684 Wel33
Sl.blo!at SlbIoliIt $6IU
2020 $200 $oW $240 I $34ll I M1su1aneous
$500 $100 $600 I $870 I Water line Loop CIostres
Sl.blo!at I SI..tIlotaI:I $1.219
TOTAl: $15,2:95 J3,zTS
ToQ/:
$17,111
(1) Assume inflation @ 2.5".4
(2) All years in which no major construction is planned a 5200,000 miscellaneous item
is shown to cover small capital expo (telemetry, hydrants, chemical equipment, etc.)
(3) The well cooslruclion schedule is based on maintaining a ratio of approximately 1 well
to f!NefY 1000 to 1200 ERU,C92 which is the current ratio.
CIP Schedule
UlA-
APPENDI~
cip&cashf1owproje<:;lion
ATER FEE CALCULATION SUMMARY
$ 4,042,562
$
$ 4.042,562
$
$ 2,690,615
$
$ 2.690,615
$
$ 4,308.200
$
$ 4,308,200
$
204
136
218
APPENDIX 6B
Pago1ot1
@fRJtJJf?
Totat City.constructed Assessment per ERU: $ 568
Deveto Provided Distribution s slam ssessment Fee
2002 Developer-provided Distribution Replacement Cost Less Depree $
Provide 50% for replm:ement $
Collection System Capacity, ERU's; $
2002 Assessment Charge:
19,516,989
9,188,495
19,800
Previous Collection System Charge por ERU: $
Percent Change:
$
494
Subtotal: $
613
56%
TOTAL WATER CHARGE: $
Total wlo System Development Foe: $
Previous Fee: $
Percent Increase:
8/912002
FEE SUMMARY.august
1,052
$
330
1,382
1,052
104
49.4%
water fee
APPENDIX 6C
Page 1 of 1
Water System Cost & Depreciation
Current Yaar:
Current ENR-CCl:
2002
6500
SUBDMSIONS
Fiscal Original Ccst: ENR.
Year Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Depreciation Less Depreciation
1973 $61 ,044 1895 $209,386 $34,290 $175,096
1976 $12,880 2401 $34,869 $6,577 $28,292
1978 $329,238 2776 $770,910 $153,726 $617,184
1979 $308,455 3003 $667,652 $137,965 $529,686
1980 $79,063 3237 $158,761 $33,892 $124,869
1981 $161,321 3535 $296,630 $66,880 $229,750
1982 $209,007 3825 $355,175 $83,600 $271 ,575
1983 $94,029 4066 $150,317 $35,738 $114,579
1984 $114,100 4146 $178,883 $40,776 $138,107
1985 $323,996 4195 $502,020 $110,160 $391,860
1986 $51,643 4295 $78,156 $16,331 $61.825
1987 $48,464 4406 $71,497 $13.270 $58,227
1988 $157,769 4519 $226,930 $42,257 $184,673
1989 $43,250 4615 $60,915 $10,380 $50,535
1990 $411,454 4732 $565,184 $96,413 $468,771
1991 $403,515 4835 $542,471 $87,159 $455,312
1992 $1.315,352 4985 $1,715,103 $262,645 $1,452,458
1993 $479.730 5210 $598.512 $77,442 $521,070
1994 $1,504,693 5408 $1,808,525 $217,132 $1,591 ,394
1995 $854,248 5471 $1,014,917 $105,464 $909,453
1996 $1,415,858 5620 $1,637.558 $148,054 $1,489,504
1997 $2,081,742 5825 $2,322,974 $166,230 $2,156,744
1998 $1,991,581 5920 $2,186,702 $128,716 $2,057.985
1999 $1,766,441 6053 $1,696,888 $72,392 $1,824.496
2000 $2,078,741 6221 $2,171,969 $51.876 $2,120,093
2001 $1,528,449 6342 $1,566,528 $10,886 $1,555.641
2002
Replacment
Cumulative Replacement Cost
@ocr;::-.,
J[)l .
.( <: ,-.
lJu u2J ~ if
$17,826,063
$21.789,432
$2,210,252
$19,579,181
CITY PROJECTS
Fiscal Original Cost ENR-
Vear Capital Assets CCI (a) Cost Depreciation Less Depreciation
1977 $848,712 2576 $2,141,548 $408,961 $1,732,587 Tank, dlstribtution
1983 $46,570 4066 $74,448 $14,903 $59,544
1987 $115,950 4406 $171,057 $30,147 $140,910 86 water extensions
1988 $0 4519 $0 $0 $0
1990 $0 4732 $0 $0 $0 Ten Mile Rd. Extension
1991 $0 4835 $0 $0 $0 Well #12
1992 $136.766 4985 $178,331 $21,880 $156,450 Well #11 Fence, Wtr Dept. Blda
1993 $3,420 5210 $4,267 $425 $3,841 Press Zone Chk Vlv Stat.
1994 $0 5408 $0 $0 $0 Telemellv Sys, Well 14/15, Mer. Greens Bstr Stat 2
1995 $3,406 5471 $4,047 $1,092 $2,955 Well No. 12 Rehab
1996 $16,404 5620 $18,973 $2,773 $16,200 Well No. 16
1997 $179,247 5825 $200,018 $16.940 $183,078 Linder Road Water Extension
1998 $52,887 5920 $58,069 $3,297 $54,772 Well No. 17
1999 $514,222 6060 $551,558 $22,298 $529,260 Well 19, 18, Ustick Reservoir
2000 $1,354,748 6221 $1.415,506 $33,452 $1,382,055 Well #20, Ustick Reservoir
2001 $45,631 6342 $46,768 $160 $46,607 Well #21
TOTAL DISTF $21,144,026
8/612002
Replacment
CumUlative Replacement Cost
$3,317,963
$4.864,588
$556,329
$4,308,260
$26,654,021
$2,766,580
$23,887,440
water asset summ.
FEE SUMMARY.3-6-02
8/612002
UnitCosl Tolal Cost
$17.00 $198,220
$0.00 $0
$800.00 $24,000
$700.00 $21,000
$1,000.00 $9,000
$250 $3,750
Subtotal: $255,970
$38,396
$17,918
$56,313
$312,283
$46.843
Total: $369,126
Overall 8" Unit Cost: $30.80 per lineal foot
Overall 12" Unit Cost: $36.62 per lineal foot
Over-size Cost: $5.82 per lineal foot
'Surface repair not normally included in costs for internal water line since streets are
being constructed for subdivision.
WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEE CALCULATION
12" Section Line Water Main Cost Estimate
Use: 5300 LF (114 mile)
Item
12' PVC
Surface Repair
12" Gate varve
12" Tee
Blowoff
Connect to Main
Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
5300 $24.00 $127,200
5300 $9.00 $47,700
7 $1,200.00 $8,400
2 $750.00 $1,500
1 $1,000.00 $1,000
1 250 $250
Subtotal: $186,050
15% $27,908
7% $13,024
Subtotal: $40,931
Construction Subtotal: $226,981
0.15 $34,047
Total: $261,028
Overall Unit Cost: $49
Miscellaneous
MoblPermitslBonds
Engineering/Slaking
Area Benefitted by Section Line Waler Main
Area '" 640 ac/4 '"
0.2500 sq. mi.
160 acres
320 acres
5300 LF
x 2 sides of line '"
Water Trunk Length, Section Street
Section Line
T olal Trunk
Length,1t
5300
Area, At
320
Water Trunk
Cost
per At;re
$815.71
Cost
$261,028
Net Development Density:
Water Trunk CoslIERU for section-line mains:
2.5 ERUJacre
$326 per ERU
lnternallmid-section line) water trunks
Total water trunk length, east-west;
Total water trunk length, north-south:
Total Water Trunk Length:
'Meandering' Factor:
Actual Estimated Total Length:
5,300 lineal feet
5,300 lineal feet
10,600 linea! feet
1
11,660 lineal feet
Item
6'PVC
'Surface Repair
8" Gate Valve (1 per 400')
8" Tee (1 per 400')
Blowoff (1 per 1/4 mQ
Connect to Main (1 per 800')
Quantity
11,660
11 ,660
30
30
9
15
Miscellaneous
MoblPennilslBonds
15%
7%
Engineering/Staking
Subtolal:
Construction Subtotal:
0.15
Over-size Cost per square mile:
No. of ERU/sq. mi.:
Over.size Cost per ERU:
Water Trunk CostlERU for section-line mains, from above:
Subtotal:
Program Admin @ 10%:
It Water System Development Fee:
$40611
version 2
Without
Surface Repair
$127,200
$0
$8,400
$1,500
$1,000
$250
$138,350
$20,753
$9,685
$30.437
$168,787
$25,318
$194.105
$37
'~.-
~ ;::J
~ c
$67.905
1,600
$42.44
$326 per ERU
$369
$37
APPENDIX 6D
Page 1 of 1
2 C;::I
;/
water
I'-
X
o
z
w
a..
a..
<(
N
Ol
U.
""" " " -, , x ..... , , , " " " ,,"- ,...."'....x x "- '- ...-, .........
'[7 0)
Knnn In II 111111 III .....
0
" ,."............x ....,....,....,.... ~....,...., ........,......... N
;; .R
"IIHII II II III
I.... ....,....,,,...., ",,".,.... " " ,,-,,-..;., ~....,.........
,....
n Ii II II .....
0
I"................"'..... ,......................."".....""".....,'" N
'"
If IT IT iHil1 II
,,'- ......'......... '" ""''I.'' ,.......,........... ........,
II IT I1I11 IIII1
I"................, ....x"", ~.... ............
n 1111111111111
..~....x........ ...............,.... ~~-'-.... '"
1.0
.....
o
N
/If
II
r".................., ...."...,....
" ....
/ "
,....,'" ,-...:- ",'"''
(7'7.;07
C')
.....
o
N
>-
.....
(.)
CU
Q.
CU
U
cd
~
o
U.
"0
4)
.....
(.)
4)
'-'
o
10...
a..
a..
I-
~
InTilll1 I II II
1'- '- -.... .... .... .... -" , ... .... , ... .... .... ,_ '- ,,', "- , .... , " "-
[:7'/./ //-t'
III il II III IlItll
I................... '-.... '\.""".... ."- ,.".....,~ '\............... '- ....
!:~"~;r
III ill
-"'...,.... ....",...., "" ~,,_~.... ",,,'I.,,,, ~"".....
I Vi ,/ / /T7-'
II I
I' " '" ........" '" " '- , "- " .... .... .... ..... .... ... ',- ,,-,....
T;,>/i~'_~.??'.._.,~.~.~" ./
(J)
o
o
N
......
.....
o
N
~Ilill
m
~ I
m-I
1111 II II Ilff
,,-, '''.' -....-""
r -Y',/ "j'"
Illm 1111111111111
... "- .... .... .... '- " ..... '- , ....,,~ "- .... .... .... '" .... "
,....
o
o
N
1'-'" " " , " " " .... , ,_
I I
I; II
I........
I
L"';- ~,# .=>," .._~". ___/' _' ;c
ff J
II IT
.... '- , .... , ... ",.... .... ,- " ... ... -.... -... -" .... ..... , "" .... , ,
rt
I
1.0
o
o
N
hi I II
''''''',. ...~..... "........,"'......
r:T
E I II
'-"'''-'' ,"-"....,," "-"'''---''''
r
0111111 II I
I' ,_,-"-........,, " -, ... , , "''''''' -... .... ,,-...
!7?
III
I""~....'-"'-"',-...,""
r:r7>-~-'"'
II
I,," .... ... --..;-"",.,.... '''''' '"
[7777:;
ITTfTT IT II It 11111
I' " " '- .... -.... " -" -, -, ,,-, , " "' ,
(77
C')
o
o
N
.....
o
o
N
en
(J)
en
.....
nITn
~..... " '- ...., .... '- .... -... .... , ....
,
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 cO (0
.---
:J
III
~~ "i\:"......".
~
,,-......., (J)
,....,........" .....
rr-~
I'" "- ....."",
/l1.O
(J)
",' 0)
........,....." .....
o
o
..j.
o
C!
N
o
o
ci
~
'0
Cll
0-
Cll
U
(/')
(/')
Q)
u
><
W
>.
-
'0
Cll
0-
Cll
U
rn
3:
o
u::
"0
Q)
U
Q)
B
'-
(L
1SI
o
C!
N
I
Boise Municipal Code
E. Ownership Transferred and Maintenance Assumed by City
Upon City issuance of a certificate of final completion, the City shall
assume ownership and maintenance of the public sewer. However the
developer shall be responsible for correcting any defects that shall be
found or occur within the warranty period.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8wl1~05.07 Financing Sewers
The costs of constructing sewer trunk and lateral lines shall be financed and paid
for as follows:
A. From the Sewage Works Fund created by this Chapter and as authorized
by the Council; or
B. By the creation of a local improvement district as provided by Chapter
17, Title 50, Idaho Code; or
C. By the property owners specially benefitted by the construction of the
trunk and lateml sewer; or
D. By a combination of A, B, and C as in the judgement of the City Council
may be fair and equitable in consideration of the benefits accruing to the
property owners within the area in which the sewer trunk and lateral
lines will be constructed, as well as the financial condition of the City
and the property owners in the area.
(5877, Repealed & Rcplaced, 12/15/(998)
Section 8-11-05.08 Extensions and Reimbursement Percentages
A. Construction
A user may, with prior approval of the City, finance and construct an
extension to the sewer system, if the extension is designed and
constructed in accordance with City standards.
B. Reimbursement
I.
The user may be reimbursed, as outlined below, for the
proportionate cost of the sewer benefitting adjacent or other
property by entering into a written agreement with the City if
any of the following apply:
a. The extension is located outside the user's property
(offsite) and provides sewer service to adjacent or other
property;
b. The extension is within the user's property (on site) and
is a gravity sewer larger than eight (8") in diameter;
c. The eight inch (8") diameter gravity sewer within the
user's property (onsite) is required by Public Works to
Page l8 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
be deeper than twelve (12) feet to serve upstream
properties.
d. The extension is a permanent lift station and/or force
main; or
e. The extension is a temporary lift station and/or force
main which the City has required to be oversized in
order to accommodate an area larger than the
developer's property.
2. To be eligible for reimbursement, the user must, unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer, do the following:
a. Design the sewer facilities in accordance with the City
master sewer plan and receive City approval of the
sewer construction plans and specifications;
b. Construct sewers in accordance with the City approved
plans and specifications;
c_ Receive three (3) bids for the sewer construction and
select the lowest responsive bid as determined in a
public bid opening; and
d. Receive preliminary plat approval from City Council for
the development being served by the sewer.
C. Amount of Reimbursement
I. Offsitc Gravity Extensions
The amount of reimbursement owed to the user for offsite sewer
extensions shall be based upon actual construction costs and may
also include reasonable engineering and easement acquisition
costs approved by the City.
2. Onsite Gravity Extensions
The amount of reimbursement owed to the user of onsite
"oversizing or overdepth" line extensions shall be determined by
multiplying the percentages listed below in tables, by the actual
construction costs for the various pipe sizes and depths required
for the project. Engineering costs for onsite oversizing and
overdepth sewer construction are not eligible for reimbursement
a. Onsite Sewer Pipeline Reimbursement Percentage
Pipe Size (inches)
Page 190[52
Boise Municipal Code
Pipe ~ 10 12 15 I~ 21 24 27 30 36 42
D~pth
(Fl)
12 or 0% 11.8% 21.7% 33.5% 44.9% 53.3% 59.8% 64.9% 68.6% 78.8% 82.7%
less
13 6.1% 17.9"/0 26.6% 37.1% 47.4% 55.1% 61.1% 65.9% 69.5% 79.2% !!3.0%
14 12.1% 23.9% 31.4% 40.6% 49.9% 56.9% 62.5% 66.9% 70.3% 79.6% 83.2%
15 17.6% 29.4% 35.9% 44.0% 52.4% 58.8% 63.9% 68.0% 71.2% 80.0% 83.5%
16 22.7% 34.5% 40.2% 47.3% 54.7% 60.6% 65.3% 69.1% 72.1% 80.5% 83.8%
I7 27.4% 39.2% 44.1% 50.4% 57.0% 62.3% 66.6% 70.2% 73.0% 80.9% 84.1%
18 31.8% 43.6% 47.8% 53.3% 59.3% 64.0% 68.0% 7U% 73.9% SU% 84.4%
19 33.8% 45.6% 49.6% 54.7% 60.3% 64.9"/" 68. 7% 71.8% 74.3% 81.6% 84.6%
20 35.9% 47.7% 5U% 56.2% 61.4% 65.7% 69.3% 72.4% 74.8% 81.8% ~4.11%
21 37.3% 49.6% 53.0% 57.6% 62.5% 66.6% 70.0% 73.0% 75.3% n.l% !!4.9%
22 39.8% 51.6% 54.7% 58.9% 63.6% 67.4% 70.7% 73.5% 75.7% 82.3% 85.1%
23 41.6% 53.4% 56.4% 60.3% 64.7% 6R3% 71.4% 74.1% 76.2% 82.6% 85.3%
24 43.4% 55.2% 57.9% 61.6% 65.7% 69.2% 72.1% 74.7% 76.7% 82.11% !l5.5%
25 45.2% 57.0% 59.5% 62.9% 66.7% 70.0% 72.8% 75.2% 77.2~~ 83.1% S5.7%
26 46.9% 58.7% 61.0% 64.2% 67.1\% 70.8% 73.5% 75.8% 77.7% 83.4% 85.9%
27 411.5% 60.3% 62.4% 65.4% 68.8% 71.6% 74.2% 76.4% 711.l% 83.6% 116.1%
211 50.0% 6U!% 63.1\% 66.6% 69.7% 72.4% 74.8% 76.9% 78.6.,{, 1\3.9% S(d";.,
29 51.5% 63.3%. 65.2% 67.7% 70.7% 73.2% 75.5% 77.5% 79.1% 84.2%, 86.5%
30 53.0% 64.8% 66.5% 6K8% 71.6% 74.0% 7(>.1% 79.0% 79.6% 84.4% 116.7%
Onsite Sewer Manhole Reimbursement Percentage
Pipe Size (inches)
Pipe Depth 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 36 42
(FTl
12 or less 0"10 I. 9"10 4.7% 10.5% 15.7% 22.7% 28.7% 43.0% 46.9% 59.2% 63.7%
13 7.6% 9.5% 12.0% 17.4% 22.2% 28. 7% 34.2% 47.4% 51.0% 62.3% 66.5%
14 14.0% 15.9% 18.3% 23.3% 27.7% 33.9% 38.9% 5L2% 54.5% 65.0% 68.9%
Page 20 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
15 19.6% 2J.5~'t. 23.7% 28.4% 32.6% 38.2% 42.9% 54.4% 57.5% 67.4% 71.0%
16 24.5% 26.4% 28.5% 32.9% 36.8% 42.0% 46.5% 57.3% 60.2% 69.4% 12.8%
17 2!!.9''Io 30.8% 32.7% 36.8% 40.5% 45.5% 49.7% 59.8% 62.5% 71.2% 74.4%
18 32.7% 34.6% 36.4% 40.4% 43.8% 48.5% 52.4% 62.0% 64.6% 12.8% 75.8%
19 36.2% 3H.1% 39.8% 43.5% 46.8% 51.2% 55.0% 64.0% 66.4% 74.2% 77.1%
20 39.3% 41.2% 42.8% 46.3% 49.4% 53.6% 57.2% 65.8% 68.1% 75.5 % 78.2%
21 42.1% 44.0% 45.5% 48.9% 51.8% 55.8% 59.2% 67.4% 69.6% 76.7% 79.3%
22 44.6% 46.5% 48.0"10 51.2% 54.0% 57.9% 6U% 68. 9% 71.0% 77.7% 80.2%
23 46.9"10 48.8% 50.3% 53.3% 56.0% 59.7% 62.8% 70.3% 72.3% 78.7% 8U%
24 49.1% 51.0% 52.3% 55.3% 57.9% 61.4% 64.3% 71.5% 73.4% 79.6% 81.9%
25 51.0% 52.9% 54.2% 57.1% 59.5% 62.9% 65.8% 72.6% 74.5% 80.4% 82.6%
26 52.8% 54.7% 56.0% 58.7% 61.1% 64.3% 67.1% 73.7% 75.5% 81.2% 83.2%
27 54.5% 56.4% 57.6% 60.2% 62.5% 65.7% 68.3% 74.7% 76.4% 81.9% 83.9%
28 56.1% 58.0% 59.1% 61.7% 63.9% 66.9% 69.4% 75.6% 77.2% 82.5% 84.4%
29 57.5% 59.4% 60.6% 63.0% 65.1% 68.0% 70.5% 76.4% 78.0% 83.1% 85.0%
30 58.9% 60.8% 61. 9"10 64.2% 66.3% 69.1% 71.5% 77.2% 78.8% 83.7% 85.5%
3. Permanent Lift Station Extensions
The amount of reimbursemenl owed for the construction of a
pennancnt lift station and/or force main shall be based upon
actual construction costs and may also include reasonable
engineering and landscaping costs approved by the City.
4. Temporary Lift Station Oversizing
Thc amount of reimbursemcnt owed for installation of an
oversized temporary Ii ft station and/or force main shall be
determined by estimating thc cost of constructing a lift station
and force main to serve only the development, subtracled from
the actual construction costs incurred by the dcveloper.
Engineering costs for the design of the lift station and/or force
main are not eligible for reimburscmcnt.
(6030, Amcndcd, 0 I /301200 I; 5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15(1998)
Section 8-11-05.09 Developer Agreements and Methods of Reimbursement
A written agreement, not 10 exceed ten ( 10) years, shall be prepared which provides for
reimbursement of the user's proportionate costs of sewer benefitting adjacent or other
property. Depending on the reimbursement amount owed to the user and the amount of
potential reimbursement credit, the agreement will include one or more of the following
reimbursement items in the order listed below, up to the reimbursement amount:
Page 2101'52
Boise Municipal Code
A. The equivalent assessment fees owed or paid by the user as required under
subsection 8-11-06.03(D);
B. The inspection fees owed or paid by the user as required under subsection 8-11-
06_05(A);
C. The trunk connection fees paid by the user as required by subsection 8-11-
06.03(A);
D. Reimbursement of trunk connection fees and equivalent assessment fees
received by the City as others connect to the sewer from an area, downstream of
the user's property, mutually agreed upon by the City and the user; and
E. Reimbursement of trunk connection fees and equivalent assessment fees,
received by the City, as others connect to the sewer from an area, upstream ofthe
user's property, mutually agreed upon by the City and the user.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-05.10 Sewer Easement Acquisition Policies
In order to provide for a uniform and equitable treatment of property owners of
lands subject to Boise City sewer easement acquisition, and to adequately protect
the best interests of Boise City, the following policies are adopted as procedural
guides to be followed in sewer easement acquisition:
A. Define and map the proposed easement acquisition;
B. Research ownership or obtain a preliminary title policy for the property
to be included in the easement;
C. Provide each owner of property within the proposed easement a written
notice of the City's intent to acquire such easement;
D. Obtain an "opinion of value" or "appraisal" for the property proposed for
easement acquisition;
E. Offer the dollar amount stated in the "opinion of value" or "appraised
value" to the property owner for purposes of acquisition if the "opinion
of value" or "appraised value" is acceptable to the City;
F. Conduct good faith negotiations with the property owner if the value
offered is rejected; and
G. Obtain a final settlement of the easement acquisition purchase or proceed
with condemnation action if appropriate.
(6030, Amended, 0113012001; 5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/(998)
Section 8-11-05.11 Lift Stations
A. Designation of Lift Stations
Page 22 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
The Public Works Department shall designate a lift station as either
temporary or permanent, consistent with the Master Sewer Plan, at the
time such station is placed into service. The Public Works Commission
may, upon request when special circumstances exist, change the
designation of a lift station.
B. Installation of Temporary Lift Stations
Temporary lift stations may only be installed if the installation is in
accordance with public policy and approved by the Public Works
Department. The party installing the temporary lift station shall be
responsible for all construction costs and shall ensure that the temporary
lift. station is completed in accordance with the requirements of the
Department. Ownership, maintenance and operation of the temporary
lift. station shall transfer to Boise City at the time the temporary lift
station is accepted as operational by the Department.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-05.12 Food Disposal Units
A. Policy
It is the declared policy of the City to discourage and prevent discharge
of food wastes into the sanitary sewer system when such food wastes
could be disposed of in another manner. Where disposal of food wastes,
particularly by commercial and institutional users of the system is
allowed, the method and manner of such disposal shall be as required in
the subsequent portions of this Section.
B. Connection of Food Disposal Units
Domestic and commercial food waste disposal units shall be connected
and trapped separately from any other fixture or compartment, except
that a continuous waste with a flow directing partition will be acceptable
for domestic units. All units may have either automatic or hand-operated
water supply controls; however, domestic units shall be provided with an
approved inlet cover having waterway passages for use during grinding
operations.
C. No Discharge through a Grease Interceptor
No waste from a food waste grinder shall be discharged into or through a
grease interceptor.
D. Commercial Grinders
Commercial type food grinders shall be provided with not less than a two
inch (2") waste line. Each waste line shall be trapped and vented as
provided in the Plumbing Code.
E. Food Waste Grinder Requirements
All food waste grinder equipment shall be designed to meet the
following requirements:
J. Particle size: 100 percent shall pass a No.2 screen (2-mesh);
Page 23 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
2. 95 percent shall pass a No.4 screen (4-mesh);
3. Fibers shall not exceed two and one-half inches (2 112") in
length;
4. Vegetable stems shall not exceed one inch (I It) in length, and
leaf sections shall not exceed one-half inch (1/2") in the largest
dimension;
5. Equipment must be self scouring with no fouling surfaces to
cause objectionable odors, freed from electrical or mechanical
hazards, and of durable construction;
6. Such food waste grinders shall be installed under and in direct
connection with a sink or other approved receptacle, supplied
with water and discharged through a trap to a sanitary sewer
system.
F. Installation Requirements for Commercial Grinders
Waste grinders and their installation in restaurants, institutions, food
processing or storage plants, and similar operations shall meet the
requirements of this Ordinance, as well as the Plumbing Code of Boise
City. An installation will be permitted only upon the fmding of the
Department of Public Works that other methods of disposal are not
feasible and that the City sewer system can properly handle the waste.
G. Food Waste Disposal Units Must Comply
The installation, operation, and maintenance of any equipment or method
to be used for food waste disposal units shall comply with all the
provisions of this Ordinance and the regulations of the Building,
Housing, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire Prevention
Ordinances of Boise City, and if there is any conflict between the
provisions of this Ordinance and the applicable Building, Housing,
Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire Prevention codes and
ordinances of the City, such codes and ordinances shaH prevail over the
provision of this Ordinancc.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-05.13 Grease Traps
Every building, structure, or premise used or occupied by any sewer user where
any commercial or industrial operations are conducted or permitted which result
in the discharge into the sewer system of any products, waste products or other
substances, matter or liquid in the manner and to the extent prohibited in this
Chapter shall be equipped with an adequate and suitable grease trap, filter or
other interception device installed in such a manner that the products, waste
products, or other substances, material or liquids herein set forth will not flow
into or be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. The grease trap, filter or
other interceptor shall be adequately maintained and efficiently operated by such
Page 24 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
sewer user.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/(998)
Section 8-11-06 FEE AUTHORITY; CREDITS
(5877, Added, 12/15/1998)
Section 8~1l~06.01 Annual Review for Fees
The fees imposed by this ordinance shall be reviewed annually and revised
periodically as required.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-06.02 When Connection Fees Are Due
Unless otherwise specified, the connection fees imposed by subsection 8-11-
06.03 must be paid prior to initiation of sewer service, change in use of a
property already connected to sewer, or any increase in the discharge levels of
flow.
(5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-06.03 Capital Fees
A. Trunk Connection Fees
A trunk connection fee shall be imposed upon every person initiating
sewer service, changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels oftlow. The fee shall be based on values
typical of the discharger category, unless otherwise addressed by
separate contract.
Fees for a change in use or an increase in discharge levels are calculated
on an incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
B. Treatment Connection Fees
A treatment connection fee shall be imposed upon every person initiating
sewer service, changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels of flow, BOD, or TSS. The fee shall be
based upon flow, BOD, and TSS values typical of the discharger
category, unless otherwise addressed by separate contract. Fees for a
change in use or an increase in discharge levels are calculated on an
incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
A treatment plant connection fee using a fee structure that includes
ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) as a component may be charged if the City
determines, after reviewing the relationship between actual or anticipated
BOD and ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) discharges, that an atypical
discharge is or will be occurring. An atypical discharge will be
evaluated against the treatment system design and operating parameters.
(A rate system that includes ammonia-nitrogen will have a lower BOD
rate than a rate system that does not include ammonia-nitrogen.)
C. Southwest Interceptor Fees
An interceptor connection fee shall be imposed upon every person
Page 25 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
residing in that area within the Boise Area of Impact known as the
Southwest Community Planning Area who is initiating sewer service,
changing use ofa property already connected to sewer, or increasing the
discharge levels of flow. This fee is imposed on persons in the
Southwest Community Phinning Area in recognition of the unique
requirements and impact this area has on the Boise City Sewer system.
This fee shall be based upon flow values typical of the discharger
category, unless otherwise addressed by separate contract. Fees for a
change in use or an increase in discharge levels are calculated on an
incremental basis as described in subsection 8-11-06.03(0).
D. Equivalent Assessment Fees
Any person initiating sewer service with the Boise City Sewer system
who has not otherwise paid for, or contributed proportionately toward,
the costs and expenses of constructing a sewer adjacent to or passing
through the property, whether that be by the City, a local improvement
district, or a private developer, and who subsequently desires to connect
to the sewer system, shall be required to pay an additional connection
(equivalent assessment) fee computed as follows, unless otherwise
approved by the Public Works Commission:
I. For lots up to 86,000 square feet in area, the fee shall be
calculated on the basis of the area of the lot;
2. For single family flag lots whose area within 125 feet of the
assessable frontage is less than 6,000 square feet, or lots with no
assessable frontage, a minimum equivalent assessment will be
calculated based on a lot ofless than 6,000 square feet.
3. For lots greater than 86,000 square feet in area, the fee shall be
calculated on the basis of the area of the lot fronting the sewer
within 125 feet of the frontage. However, in no case shall the
assessment be less than that for a lot of 86,000 square feet in
area;
4. For single family lots in excess of 86,000 square feet in area, the
frontage for the property shall only be assessed on the side of the
property for which the sewer service is being provided. For all
other uses the assessed frontage shall be calculated on each side
of the lot in which sewer is fronting the property, unless
otherwise waived by the Public Works Commission. However,
in no case shall the assessment be less than that for a lot of
43,560 square feet in area;
5. Large lots which can legally be further subdivided in the future,
and which are not fully utilized by the existing development, will
only be charged for the improved area andlor logical boundary
of future subdivision/development, with a minimum equivalent
assessment fee equal for a lot of 43,560 square feet;
Page 26 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
6. The equivalent assessment fee may be adjusted to reflect the
benefit received by large, open space lots which have a low
impact on the sewer system or other criteria as determined by the
Public Works Commission. When the equivalent assessment
fees for these properties create undue hardship, or fees for such
properties are inequitable in the consideration of the Public
Works Commission, the equivalent assessment fee shall be
calculated on single family dwelling equivalents. The fee for
properties complying with all the above criteria shall be
calculated by multiplying the number of single family dwelling
equivalents (SFDE's), based on fixture unit count, by the
equivalent assessment amount for a lot of 43,560 square feet.
The total equivalent assessment shall not be less than the
assessment for a lot of 86,000 square feet.
The applicant may not avoid payment of this fee by requesting
connection to another sewer if, in !:he opinion of the Public Works
Department, the proposed service line is best capable of being connected
to the sewer which is subject to the assessment
E. New Development Eight Inch Equivalency
For sewers constructed outside of a public right of way, an eight inch
equivalency fee shall be charged, based UpOll any or all of the following:
t. Relevant actual construction, engineering, and inspection costs
for other sewers constructed by the developer within the
development;
2. The actual construction and engineering, costs of the sewer on
which the assessment is due, updated by Engineering Nev.I.)
Record construction cost index; or
3. Any other relevant factors that may affect the amount of the
assessment.
This fee shall be in addition to any o!:her applicable assessment fee and
may be reduced by the Public Works Department to reflect additional
costs incurred by the developer to upgrade the sewer to current
standards.
F. Public Service Line Fee
A fee shall be charged for each public service line provided by the City,
based on the size of the service line.
G. Change of Use
Any person changing use of a property already connected to sewer, or
increasing the discharge levels of flow, BOD, or TSS, shall pay trunk,
Page 27 of 52
Boise MWlicipal Code
treatment, and southwest interceptor fees. These fees will be based on
the difference in flows and waste strengths applicable to the property
change in use, or increased levels of discharge, less the flows and waste
strengths applicable to the most intensive original sewer use at the
property within the past ten (10) years. If for example, a single family
residence served by sewer is demolished and replaced with a restaurant,
the fees will be based on the difference between the typical flows and
waste strengths for a restaurant and typical flows and waste strengths for
a residence.
H. Prepayment of Connection Fees
Any owner of an existing single family residence within Boise City and
the Boise Area of Impact, to which Boise City Sewer system service is
unavailable, may prepay the connection fees required by this Section at
the rates in effect at the time of prepayment, subject to the following
conditions:
I. The property for which connection fees are being prepaid must
have an existing single family residence constructed on it;
2. The property owner will be required to enter into an agreement
with the City of Boise which shall absolve the City of any
requirement to provide sewer service to the property. This
agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Ada County
Recorder;
3. A reasonable administrative fee shall be paid upon execution of
the prepayment agreement to cover set-up, monitoring, and
recording fees and costs;
4. The connection fees paid to the City prior to the provision of
wastewater system service shall be paid prior to the date on
which sewer becomes available; and
5. Any connection fees paid to the City prior to the provision of
wastewater system service shall be in cash and shall be non-
refundable. The deferral of connection fees as provided for in
Section 8-11-08 shall not be available to property owners
electing to prepay connection fees.
L Sewer Deposit for Future Connection of a New Subdivision
If a wet sewer is not adjacent to a subdivision or development of land in
which the Council has required, as a condition for approving the
subdivision plat or development, construction and installation of a wet-
line sewer served by an interim treatment system in accordance with
detailed plans and specifications receiving prior approval, the subdivider
or developer shall pay a deposit to the Treasurer of Boise City. This
deposit shall be paid prior to the certification of the plat by the City
Engineer, for the future connection of the sewer or interim treatment
Page 28 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
system to the wet sewer subsequently constructed and installed adjacent
and adjoining the subdivision or development of land. The money so
paid shall be deposited to the Sewage Works Fund to be used for the
purposes provided in subsection 8-11-01.08 of this Ordinance.
J. Temporary Lift Station Upgrade Fee
[fthe Public Works Department has approved the use ofa temporary lift
station to serve a proposed development and if the lift station is
undersized to serve the geographical area which may contribute flow to
the temporary lift station, the City Council may, as a condition of
approving the subdivision or development plat, require the developer to
pay a fee for upgrading of the lift station andlor permanently extending
the sewer to serve the development if it is needed prior to the logical
extension of the gravity sewer. This fee shall be deposited to the Sewage
Works Fund. [n the event these funds are not needed for the upgrade of
the lift station, the funds will be returned without interest to the
developer making payment.
(6046, Amended, 04/[0/2001; 6030, Amended, 01/30/200 I; 5877, Repealed & Replaced, 12/15/1998)
Section 8-11-06.04 Operation and Maintenance Fees
A. Service Charges and Fees
This provision shall establish a system of periodic service charges and fees for
the purpose of equitably imposing upon all users the costs and expenses of
operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the wastewater system. The
service charges and fees shall be based upon (I) the volume and content of
effluent discharged into the wastewater system of the City, and (2) the costs and
expenses of operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the wastewater
system, such charges and fees having been detennined to be the benefit derived
by each building, structure, or user being charged. The system of periodic
service charges and fees shall consist of the following categories: Facility
Replacement, Operation and Maintenance, and Fixed Charge for Zero Use.
I. Facility Replacement
The purpose of this category is to accumulate a reserve for replacement
of the wastewater system. This reserve shall be based on the total
historical costs for the applicable facilities and equipment.
2. Operation and Maintenance
The purpose of this category is to recover, equitably from all users, the
costs and expenses incurred by the City of Boise in operating and
maintaining the wastewater system.
3. Fixed Charge for Zero Use
The purpose of this category is to equitably apportion among all
customers a portion of those fixed costs which continue to be incurred
whether or not individual customers utilize the wastewater system. Such
costs include, but are not limited to, costs attributable to providing basic
office staff for the administration of the Boise City Sewer system.
Payment of these costs shall be made by all customers, including those
Page 29 of 52
Boise Municipal Code
with zero flow discharge.
B. When Payment is Due
Service charges and fees imposed pursuant to this Section shall be received by
the City by the due date shown on the invoice or billing statement.
C. Deposits
Deposits are not required for new service unless the user:
1. is rated as a poor credit risk by a reputable credit bureau;
2. has had an overdue bill three (3) times with any utility in the past
four (4) years;
3. has supplied false information at the time of application for service;
or
4. has filed for bankruptcy.
A deposit for residential service shall be equal to three months worth of
estimated charges. A deposit for commercial service shall be equal to two
months worth of estimated charges. The deposit will be refunded or credited
when the user no longer requires service or has paid all bills satisfactorily for
twenty-four (24) consecutive months.
Instead of paying a deposit, user may receive service if someone else signs a
guarantee for his bill. This person, called the "guarantor" must be rated as a
good credit risk by a reputable credit bureau. The guarantor is responsible for an
amount equal to the deposit, but will be released from this obligation after
twenty-four (24) consecutive months of satisfactory payments have been made
by the user.
D. Unmonitored Connections
The monthly sewer service charge or fee for each property owner whose
connection to the wastewater system is unmonitored shall be based upon
the winter water use of such owner or user, plus the fixed charge for zero
use.
E. Monitored Connections
The monthly service charge or fee for each sewer user whose connection
to the wastewater system is monitored shall be established by the Public
Works Department based upon (1) flow, (2) the concentration of BOD,
(3) the concentration of TSS, (4) other special constituents that may
require treatment, and (5) the fixed charge for zero use, and in
accordance with monitored waste charges, unless otherwise specified by
a separate contract.
If the City determines by reviewing the relationship between actual or
anticipated BOD and ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) discharges that an
Page 30 of 52
December 6,2002
Pre-Council Meeting
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
December 10,2002
ITEM NO.
4
REQUEST Blackstone Subdivision / Coral Creek Subdivision Request for Reimbursement for
Lift Station
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFfiCE:
OTHER: See Attached Letter from John G. Carpenter, P.E. with Pinnacle Engineers
Contacted: "Io~ C,Cv~v\""--\e-v ':Y'1W\t:l€U Date: g (2-/P-o'2- Phone: %~7- II 1..->0 L~
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. <:ss
PINNACLE
Engineers,
Inc.
TO:
Honorable Mayor & City Council
Meridian City
33 E. Idaho A venue
Meridian, ID 83642
RECEIVE
DEe - 2 2002
City of Meridian.
City Clerk Ofner,.
DATE:
November 26, 2002
RE:
Blackstone/Coral Creek Subdivisions (A.K.A. English Gardens Subdivision)
Honorable Mayor and Members of Council:
I write this letter on behalf of Paul Edminster of Projects West, Inc., who is the developer of
the above stated subdivisions.
Blackstone and Coral Creek Subdivisions were constructed at the southeast comer of Cherry
and Black Cat Roads. A lift station was constructed with the subdivisions, which pwnps
sewage to an existing gravity sewer main. The intention of the lift station was to serve only
these two subdivisions and Pintail Pointe Subdivision. The lift station was considered
temporary by the City of Meridian and would be eliminated with the addition of the Black Cat
Trunkline.
It is my understanding that other developments are requesting to tie into the system
constructed and paid for by my Client. Mr. Edminster has no objection with the system being
utilized by others but feels he should be reimbursed for a fair portion of his cost.
The construction of the lift station was substantial and expensive. The lift station was deep
(as the sewer line from the south had to cross the 10 Mile Drain), there was 1800 linear feet of
4" pressure sewer main, asphalt patch back was required on Black Cat Road, and other
associated items of work were required.
A late comers agreement was not originally requested for the lift station as we were instructed
that it was temporary and not for other properties to utilize. Mr. Edminster requests that a late
comers agreement be prepared for the sewage lift station that would fairly distribute the cost
between the parties that are using it.
A further note of interest is that the temporary lift station was constructed on a common lot
that is owned by the Homeowners Association and the lift station has not been formerly
dedicated to the City of Meridian for ownership.
C006317 Mayor&Council112602
12552 W. EXECUTIVE DRIVE, SUITE B · BOISE, IDAHO 83713 · (208) 887-7760. FAX (208) 887-778]
Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. I can be reached
at (208) 887-7760.
Sincer ly,
<\- :t /' ~~
ohn G. Carpenter, P.E.
cc: File #C006317
Paul Edminster - Projects West, Inc.
Will Berg - Meridian City Clerk
Brad Watson, P.E. - Meridian City Engineer
C0063 1 7 Mayor&Coutlcil 112602
RECEnTED
f'
~U
Recormnendations For
Parks Partnerships
eitty or
City Clerk
Group Name
Park Name
Acres Needed
Meridian Youth Baseball
___~L4.ctE~~_____
_2.2___
P.A.L. Soccer
!:.2s.!l/~~_&i15______
25
Meridian Lions Club Rodeo
-_J2~t-:Er2ffi;z-----
(f!I/ ci).er fIW fI- fioi! )
LG>_i1:.__
Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendations:
~~L4:";:: -
, ---'
,/,._,,/c.~~
~-;:;'-M~~COY.~--
_i{;_/ _.!{_/ 02-
Date Approved
s'- ?
Ice Skating Rink
Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2002
RECEIVED
DEe - 6 2002
Recormnendations For
Parks Partnerships
City of Meridia:o
City Cler.k Off}(':("-
Group Name
Park Name
Acres Needed
Meridian Youth Baseball
___~fl~5.-.Ec:::.~_____
_22._~_
P .A.L. Soccer
l~k~_0::._&i15______
25
Meridian Lions Club Rodeo
--~~_J:.Tf!:A-----
(jWtik~'if 120()
__&~~_E~.iz-___-
( ft{c;~1I !dJ...)
LQ_1'2:.__
Ice Skating Rink
5'-7
Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendations:
?&/:: .-
. /
~~-;'~~oy.~--
_L~_/ _!{_/ _r:.!:..
Date Approved
C~~l~di~t
Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2002