HomeMy WebLinkAboutFulfer Subdivision No. 5
July 17, 2006
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Russell Dunstan
MCU 06-001
July 20, 2006
ITEM NO.
5
REQUEST Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit Modification for residential home
built two feet into five foot setback (sold prior to discovery of mistake) for
Fulfer Subdivision No.5 (Lot 4, Block 5) - 2593 W. Ditch Creek Drive
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
See Attached Staff Report
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
No Comment
,/JffJV II~
?;1J
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
See Attached Comments
No Comment
No Comment
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS'IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
See Attached Affidavit of Sign Posting
cA--ckJ.~L~. Date: ~ 12 0 Phone: ?r; / - g! fJ7 ~
( lA.t1 ,1M _ 7 @ IhS/J. COI'Y) Staff Initials: ~ ~ .
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~
Contacted:
Emailed:
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF mL Y 20, 2006
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Hearing Date: 7/20/2006
Planning & Zoning Commission
Jenny Veatch, Associate City Planner
Russell Dunstan
r~
cU;~idi~"~
II MHO
.' ~,
'"
"
./:1
/"
"-t
J'~_~~ ,y,~!:,~>",II~ .;"~~!
''!I~'
MCU-06-001
Conditional Use Permit Modification for residential home built two feet into
five-foot setback in R-4 zone, by Russell Dunstan.
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant, Russell Dunstan, has applied for a Conditional Use Permit Modification approval for a
residential home built two feet into a five-foot side setback in an R-4 zone. Mr. Dunstan was given a plat
that showed the lot frontage width as seventy-six feet. However, a revised plat shows the lot frontage is
actually seventy-four feet. The home was sold prior to discovering the mistake in the setback. The subject
site is located at 2593 W. Ditch Creek Drive, Lot 4 Block 15 in the Fulfer Subdivision #5, east ofN. Ten
Mile Road in Section 26, Township 4 North, Range 1 West. Note: There is some discrepancy in the
zoning for this site. This portion of the Lochsa Falls preliminary plat was sold to an adjoining developer
and final platted as Fulfer Subdivsion. The preliminary plat and CUP-02-012 in Lochsa falls were zoned
R-4. The fma] plat for Fulfer Subdivision No. 5 was also zoned R-4. However, the City of Meridian
Zoning map and the Ada County Assessor currently show the lot in question as zoned R-8. This report
reflects the R-4 zone designation. Staff is researching this discrepancy.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff met with the applicant for a pre-application meeting and provided the following options to the
applicant regarding the home constructed into the side setback. The applicant could tear down and
reconstruct the home. He could apply for a variance and staff would not be able to make the findings for
approval. It would go forward to Council with a recommendation for denial. Or, he could request
approval of a CU modification because the original CUP requested reduced setbacks. The applicant chose
the latter option. Staff has provided a detailed analysis of the requested application below. Staff
recommends approval of MCU-06-001, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to modify the side setback of
CUP-02-012 of five feet to three feet for Russell Dunstan, at the site of 2593 W. Ditch Creek ONLY,
as presented in the Staff Report for the hearinl! date of Julv 20. 2006, subiect to the conditions
listed in Exhibit B.
3. PROPOSED MOTIONS
Approval
After considering all staff: applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number MCU-
06-001 as presented in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 20, 2006, with the following
modifications to the conditions of approval: (add any proposed modifications). T further move to
direct staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered at the next Plarming and
Zoning Commission hearing on August 3, 2006.
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number MCU-06-
001 as presented during the hearing of July 20,2006, for the following reasons: (you must state
specific reason(s) for the denial of the Conditional Use Permit Modification.) I further move to
direct Legal Department Staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered at the
next Planning and Commission hearing on August 3, 2006.
Russell Dunstan (MCU-06.Q01) - Page I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF mLY 20,2006
Continuance
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number
MCU-06-001 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following
reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location: 2593 W. Ditch Creek Drive, Lot 4 Block 15, Fulfer Subdivision #5,
east of Ten Mile Road in Section 26, T4N R1 W.
b. Owners:
John and Sandra Calpin
2593 W. Ditch Creek Drive
Meridian, ID 83642
c. Applicant:
Russell Dunstan
175 Dewey Lane
Nampa, lD 83687
d. Representative: Russell Dunstan
e. Prcsent Zoning: R-4
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Medium Density Residentia]
g_ Description of Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit
Modification approval for a residential home built two feet into a tive foot side setback in an
R-4 zone. The home was sold prior to discovering the mistake in the setback.
I. Date of CUP Site Plan (attached in Exhibit A): October 5, 2005
5. PROCESS FACTS
a_ The subject application will in fact constitute a conditional use as determined by the Unitied
Development Code. By reason ofthe provisions ofUDC 11-5B-6, a public hearing is required
before the Planning and Zoning Commission on this matter.
b. Miscellaneous applications are not currently addressed in Title] 1 of the Meridian City Code.
It has been determined by the City's Legal Department that a miscellaneous application to
amend a recorded development agreement will in fact require a public hearing before the City
Council.
c. Newspaper notitications published on: Ju]y 3rd and July 17'\ 2006
d. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: June 23rd, 2006
e. Applicant posted notice on site by: July 10lh, 2006
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): Single-family residential
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: Residential
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Russell Dunstan (MCU-06-001) - Page 2
ClTY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAfF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JULY 20, 2006
1. North: Lochsa Falls Subdivision, zoned R-4.
2. East: Paramount Subdivision, zoned C-G.
3. South: Bridgetower Subdivision, zoned R-4.
4. West: Lochsa Falls Subdivision, zoned R-4.
d. History of Previous Actions: In August, 2003, CUP-02-012 was approved for the Planned
Development, Lochsa Falls Subdivision of which this site is a part, to allow reduced lot size
and frontage, and to exceed block length requirements. A side setback of five feet was
requested in the original CUP. This is the only setback that is applicable to this request for
modification of the CUP. (Please note that this portion of the Lochsa Falls preliminary plat
was sold to an adjoining developer and final platted as Fulfer Subdivsion.)
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities
1. Public Works
Location of sewcr: Building already serviced.
Location of water: Building already serviced.
Issues or concerns: None.
2. Vegetation: None.
3. Flood plain: NA
4. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: No major facilities.
5. Hazards: None
6. Existing Zoning: R-4
7. Size of Property: 9,250 square feet
f. Conditional Use Information:
1. Non-residential square footage: N/ A
2. Proposed building height: 32 feet
3. Number of Residential units:
g. Off-Street Parking:
1. Parking spaces required: 2
2. Parking spaces proposed: 3
h. Proposed and Required Residential Setbacks:
R-4
Setbacks (in feet) Proposed CUP-02-012 Required
Front Living Area (to sidewalk) 20 20 20
Front Accessed Garage (to sidewalk) 20 20 20
Side 3 5 5
Rear 48 15 15
Frontage (garage facing street) 74 60 80
Russell Dunstan (MeV-06-00 1) - Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REI'ORT FOR HiE HEARING DATE OF JULY 20, 2006
Lot Size (garage facing street)
9,250
6,500
8,000
i. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access (private, public, common drive, etc.): Access to
the site will be from an existing street, W. Ditch Creek Drive. NOTE: The ACHD has
provided no comments related to this site, as it has no new conditions for the subject applicant.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On June 30, 2006 Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting_ The agencies and departments
present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Police Department, Meridian Public Works
Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included all comments and recommended
actions as Conditions of Approval in the attached Exhibit B.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
This property is designated "Medium Density Residential" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Map. Medium density residential areas are anticipated to contain three to eight dwellings per acre (see
Chapter VII, Page 95 ofthe Comprehensive Plan.) Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies
to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics):
. Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services.
(Chapter VII, Goa] III, Objective A, Action 1)
When the City established its Area of City Impact. it planned to provide City services to the
subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the lands in the
following manner:
. Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the
developer's expense.
. The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire
Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian
Rural Fire Department.
. The subject lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD).
. The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained
by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) and lTD. This service will not
change.
. The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District #2. This
service will not change.
. The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This
service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no
revenue loss.
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 - Protect existing residential properties from
incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.
The applicant is proposing a modification to a conditional use in a residential zone. Staff
finds that the existing single-family residential properties to the north, south, east and west,
are compatible with the proposed (existing) site.
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10 - Support a variety of residential categories
(low-, medium~, and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes,
apartments, condominiums, etc
Russell Dunstan (MCU-06-00 I) - Page 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JULY 20, 2006
Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided to this site by the Meridian Building
Department, the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the
Meridian Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility
Billing Services, and Sanitary Services Company.
Staff finds that the proposal is generally hannonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
9. ZONING ORDINANCE
a. Zoning Schedule of Use Control: UDC 11-2A-2 lists single-family, detached dwellings as a
permitted use in the R-4 zone.
b. Purpose Statement of Zone:
R-4 Medium-Density Residentia]: The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a
range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all
residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of
dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the
density range.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Staffis generally supportive of the
proposed site design as presented in the CUP Site Plan labeled as Sheet S-l.O, prepared by
Gowanwood Associates, Inc., dated October 5, 2005, with the following comments:
Existing Approvals: This site has previously been approved for a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP-02-012) to a Planned Development, Lochsa Falls Subdivision of which this site is a
part, to allow reduced lot size and frontage, and to exceed block length requirements (see
above for proposed and required setbacks). Staff recommends that the existing home be
allowed to stay with the proposed use.
Uses: The applicant is proposing that the existing residential home which, was built two
feet into the five-foot setback, remain with no other changes.
Conditional Uses: In approving any conditional use, the decision-making body may prescribe
appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this Title that: minimize
adverse impact of the use on other property, control the sequence and timing of the use,
control the duration of the use, assure that the use and the property in which the use is located
is maintained properly, designate the exact location and nature of the use and the property
development, require the provision for on-site or off-site public facilities or services, required
more restrictive standards than those generally required in this Title, and require mitigation of
adverse impacts of the proposed development upon service delivery by any political
subdivision, including school districts, that provides services within the City (UDC ll-5B-
60).
Vacation: To ensure that all of the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B are complied
with, the applicant should be required to obtain a Vacation tor the two-foot easement from
the Planning Department. The home encroaches into a public utilities, drainage and irrigation
easement centered on the interior lot lines ofthe subdivision.
b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of MCU-06-001. Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) to modify the side setback of CUP-02-012 of five feet to three feet for
Russell Dunstan. at the site of 2593 W. Ditch Creek ONLY, as oresented in the Staff
Russell Dunstan (MCU-06-001) - Page 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF mL Y 20, 2006
Report for the hearinl! date of Julv 20. 2006. subiect to the conditions listed in Exhibit
B.
11. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. CUP Site (dated October 5,2005)
B. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Sanitary Service Company
6. Ada County Highway District
7. Central District Health Department
8. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District.
C. Required Findings from Zoning Ordinance
I .
Russell Dunstan (MCU-06-00 1) - Page 6
Ir-"
J
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JULY 20, 2006
A. Drawings
1. CUP Site (dated October 5,2005)
!111; 1
~'I~~t!
~~i; I
~lt
",.,I ,
of!
~
I .'".---..--, "-.....
I - -- - - - - -- -f -- - - - - n_ I
, -. -I I
i "-,, C- -, ".f---1
~ I '-l-II~ ~
-I' h "
, 1". _
I TT--I-1,1
. U--;"- '.--/e
I . - ~ ,~--~+~:'__ ~
__t __I I
f2f:rw
~ ~"'\
~W' ~
, r."
" :>\
f"Tl r"
~!'t
.. - .- - - 1:".--'"" .." -.
-.-
re_ ,~~ ,~. N. (,n' ~:J' J'- ,_
;<
~
1-
,....
r~-;"~-.~o~~ ~~.~~~ r~ l
j!llllllj :!r~;; I
~~.
:<<..
r
T
~--. -
I. " ';;-f'",-', .':"--,
,,:, " I~ ~" I
I!l!!;; H !, II
l'"'' I
(' ----~--,J
~:::,:
I ~ ~;
b.~ ii
RUSS DUNSTAN
HOMES
[~~
GrrW ANW66D -""", " . - '..i-:=.
A:8g'"cicT I\.TE8. rN"C" 1" 'H ""'~-- ". ---.
IOOI'Il~....I".lI.oj '"n4"n.lj,iIo IIlh~ I'''''I\III'_'I!JT __ ,.T. __ __._
Exhibit A -- Page 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF mLY 20, 2006
B. Conditions of Approval
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENTS
1.1 The CUP Site Plan labeled as S~ 1.0, prepared by Gowanwood Associates, Inc., dated October S,
200S is approved, with the conditions listed herein. The applicant shall comply with all applicable
provisions from the previous CUP-02-012 approval for this site.
1.2 To ensure that all of the conditions of approval for MCU-06-001 are complied with, the
applicant shall be required to obtain a Vacation (V AC) for the two feet of public utilities,
irrigation and drainage easement.
1.3 The applicant shall have a maximum of 18 months to commence the use as permitted in
accord with the conditions of approval listed above.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Public Works has no concerns with this application providing the applicant vacate the portion of
the easement in which the house is encroaching upon.
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 The proposed project has no fire department concerns.
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application.
5. SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY
5.1 SSC has no comments related to this application.
6. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
6.1 ACHD has no site specific requirements at this time.
7. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEAL TH DEPARTMENT
7.1 No objections to this proposal.
8. NAMPA AND MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
8.1 No comments on this application.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JULY 20, 2006
C. Required Findings from Zoning Ordinance
1. Conditional Use Permit Modification Findings:
CUP Findings:
The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit Modification
request upon the following:
1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the
dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located.
Thc existing building on this site cannot accommodate and meet all dimensional and development
regulations of this district. This site has previously been approved for a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP-02-012) allowing reduced lot size, rcduced frontage, and exceeding block length
requirements. The Commission should rely on Staff's analysis, and any oral or written public
testimony provided when determining if this site is large enough to accommodate the proposed
use.
2. That the proposed use will be barmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and
in accord with the requirements of this Title.
Staff finds that the designated Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is "Residential."
The proposed use is generally harmonious with the requirements of the UDC (see Section 8,
above for more information regarding the requirements for this use.)
3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance wiD be compatible with other
uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinity and that such use wiD not adversely change the essential character of
the same area.
Staff finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the general
design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed use should be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area.
4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will
not adversely affect other property in the vicinity.
Staff finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed
uses will not adversely affect other property in the area. The Commission should rely upon any
public testimony provided to determine if the development will adversely affect the other
property in the vicinity.
5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
Staff finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water, refuse disposal, and irrigation are currently
available to the subject property. Please refer to any comments prepared by the Meridian Fire
Department, Police Department, Parks Department, Sanitary Services Corporation and ACHD.
Based on comments from other agencies and departments, staff finds that the proposed use will
be served adequately by all of the public facilities and services listed above.
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF mL Y 20, 2006
6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
Staff finds there will not be additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will
not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare.
7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
Staff does not anticipate the proposed use will create excessive noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or
odors. Staff finds that the proposed uses will not bc detrimental to people, property or the general
welfare ofthe area.
8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff finds that there should not be any health, safety or environmental problems associated with
this development that should be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that the
proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic or historic
feature of major importance.
Exhibit C
-7!ZRJ
.,#f;i~ll',-
A~
&'~ed-;((' ~
John S. Franden, President
Carol A. McKee, 1st Vice President
Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
Rebecca W. Amold, Commissioner
July 5, 2006
To:
Russell Durstan
17 S. dewey Ln.
Nampa, ID 86387
MMCU-06-001
Setback Modification
2593 W. Ditch Creek
.RECEIVED
.' ~ .
\1 :
j n '"y.,-
I r.J L~j'lk~
., ,<'.........
SUbject:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
--~ '1~\I
C, : (;/ ~R'/ nr::-r-rrr-
-, ... r\, :. 1'- '. J' l-
In response to your request for comment, the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff
has reviewed the submitted application and site plan for the item referenced above. It has
been determined that the Right-of-Way and Development Services Department does not
have any site specific requirements for you at this time due to the fact that the proposed
development will not generate more than 10 new vehicle trips per day and is not a change
in use. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD will review the site plan
and may require improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development
Review Department.
A traffic impact fee may be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance
of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170
for information regarding impact fees.
Prior to the construction or installation of any roadway improvements (curb, gutter,
sidewalk, pavement widening, driveways, culverts, etc), a permit or license agreement
must be obtained from ACHO.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6177.
SYferely'~ /
C:f'7\ /",
{/l/'4?i
Joe unz
Planner Intern
Right-of-Way and Development Services
Uh//
.... J'
.,'
~ /~>;:/
//
;/
CC: Project file, Construction Services, City of Meridian,
John & Sandra Calpin
2593 W. Ditch Creek
Meridian, 10 83642
Ada County Highway District · 3775 Adams Street · Garden City, ID . 83714 . PH 208-387-6100 . FX 345-7650 . www.achd.ada.id.us
r rK:;;;sef! ,[;l6~ ~$t-("r:!Z 26 U
072,/\ Cd'e~ K ~ '/-/o~() 6 ~"
'/~~f #
.....------.............~-
...........
.. rry l'~..
.~~]..---!.'4i.
l4f ~OT~J-.. ~....
. , , ...
. I , ..
. ' I .
. \ : ..
. \ , .
... \ I &l
. .p.', A~. C I ..
.. ~....:::-<<!~~..':'~o...
..~OF1P~.
.....
~~J)
jUOJIAA91U J:idd
- -,no,," I
i5:;J(/l{IS I ( ~ dl~(/f
RE'(~E"I"V" E7'\I'
'." ....1 ...; ..,;.... , ~J.. .)
JUL 1 2 2006
Citv Of Meridian
Ci(v Clerk. Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
July 20, 2006
ITEM #
5
DATE
PROJECT NUMBER
MCU 06-001
PROJECT NAME
Fulfer Subdivision No.5 (Lot 4, Block 5)
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
e"", -<) e II Il.u A "'\ 7r-:t if } )('
'-"
T"t '.1' 11:.0' . 'T~ D
1."".1- . - - ~ .&;;j
.... . ^ ,....^"
JUL ,. i.J LUu\:
-. . .
,
City Clerk Offi.c e
-t/~
~ & ~ 'l~ 'Di4tIUct
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651 -4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
30 June 2006
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466"0663
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
660 E. Wate:;:tcw:er -Lane Suite_ 202
Meridian, ill 83642
RE: MeV 06-00l/Fulfer Subdivision No.5
Dear Anna:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced application
for Fulfer Subdivision as it is out of our district.
Please contact Settler's Irrigation District at 344-2471 or P.O. Box 7571, Boise, Idaho, 83707.
Sincerely,
f:~
t: An~erson
Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
IPAldbg
c: Board of Directors
Secretary/Treasurer
Asst. Water Superintendent
File
~'RE C E lYE])
L:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
'-_~\T\I CLERK. CF:=!CI=
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS. 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
S"'\"\, TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON
} DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
/1
SIN" To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by
1903 the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your
comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: July 13, 2006
Transmittal Date: June 22, 2006 File No.: MCU 06-001
Hearing Date: July 20, 2006
Request: Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit Modification for
residential home built two feet into five foot setback (sold prior
to discovery of mistake) for Fulfer Subdivision No.5 (Lot 4, Blk 5)
j
WI~
c:Me~;dl~it~
IDAHO
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
Cn'Y COUNCIL M,EMBERS
Keith Bird
Joseph w. Borton
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
898-5506 (City Attorney)
898-5503 (HR)
Fax 884-8723
2593 W. Ditch Creek Drive
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 I fax 895-0390
j I']E~" ()Ea~td~Zare~-b1,(J'ip)
AS 11l:1.;~fulVlEMae'I;"''hIF:P,V:'
- ~.~I_""^Jl....jt;
Wendy Newton-Huckabay (No FP)
Michael Rohm (No FP)
Keith Borup (No FP)
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Charlie Rountree, C/C
Joe Borton, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Shaun Wardle, C/C
Water Department
X Sewer Department
Sanitary Services(No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department I Rich Greene
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 I fax 898-5501
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 I fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 I fax 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 I fax 895-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 I fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 I fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.W. 8th Street
888-5242 I fax 884-1159
Your Concise Remarks:
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office(FP/Pp only)
Ada County HighWay District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrig. District
Idaho Power CO. (FP,PP.GUP)
Qwest (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only)
Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP)
_ Ada County Ass. Land Records
Meridian Develo/Wl!!tjril~...,. 7r'I
== Historical Preser.8i4Rtt.e.W. v.riD
JUN 2 6 200ti
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
!Vo-C~
-if.
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884"8119
Printed on recycled paper
7/UJ
(i.-- C~DEEI~~TATRARKtTc~~JN~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
... Environmental Health Division
Rezone #
Conditional Use # J11 f U 0(., -<)0 I
Preliminary / Final/Short Plat
Return to:
o Boise
DEagle
o Garden City
~eridian
o Kuna
OACZ
q Star
~ We have No Objections to this Proposal.
02.
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
._,un""
"' (~, :w: ". .' ,
We recommend Denial of this Proposal. CITY OF MEHIDIAt\!
CITY CLERk' C:=-r:ICF
Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. --
We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
o high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics
o or bedrock from original grade 0 other
This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
o central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well
o interim sewage 0 central water
o individual sewage 0 individual water
The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
o central sewage
o sewage dry lines
o community sewage system
o central water
o community water
o 10. Run-off is not to create a -mosquito -breeding problem.
o 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
o 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
o 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
o food establishment 0 swimming pools or spas
o beverage establishment 0 grocery store
o child care center
Date:~~ Of-
Reviewed By: 4-- #-4--
o 14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations
015.
15726-001 EH0904
Review Sheet