HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-03-15
(""" .
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
3. Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water Division:
Presented
*Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridjan City Pre-Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
I Charlie Ro ntree )( Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~()~
3. Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water Division:
~~
it Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian C~y Pre-Council Agenda - March 15_ 2005 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingsJ
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
~ 8 !~
~ '" .5
~ ~ ~~
rJ:l ou
0 et= 86
<t:
r:;i:I ::E
~
~
:2
~ 2
:~..
o
lO
II
W
-J
<
U
(I)
I
~
('11(I
i
I i ~
2
o
o
o
o
Q
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
U
-<t:
utO
<(q: U
~ <i:
-< ll1 ~U1
0.. to
~ ~ ~ ,...., N
LO ~O 0 ~
~o.:: .~
W ~ W IL. ~
l- Q::!;.;:~~
U) d:?;:COa...
~~g~
~[jGS(;}
o
o
~
~
a..
o
:c
(J1
w 0
Q 0
~
Q
~ t"
0
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ t!3 ~~
> ~ .50
J.n ~ 11
~ - ~o
O ~ &~
:::E Uu
~
W
.-J 0
<(
() 0 a..
if) 0
:c
Vl
~
~
~ e
o
to
2
~
:!:
~ ~~
~ ~
<'I .50
Ln ~:rJ
~ ~u
0 Ct::: 88
<
~ .:::
~
~
0
0
0
1.0
:: 0
~
W
....J
~ 0
(f) 0
0
0
0
I
~
N
i
I ~
:?
Ow
~ ~
w
0 Q :I ...
g
0 ~
Ct::: tt
U <(
<( a..
0 ul:() U ~
<q u .....:( ~
0
u Lf) 0 .<J.: ~
0 <( ci 4L-<(LD
U1 ~~~ X
ui 0O~ 0
~ 0::'
Zo::: .. a....
0 W 2 w .~ ~ a...
I-- a::!:;:~~ <{
0 U1 ~~QJc.. l"f1-
0 w 0cj0~ ~
a::
0 ~ ~~~x z
z 0
0 w wwww ~ ~
a..
~ 0
~
~ \7<: 'zo)-
~ !
~ ~
I/O
(..
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
3
REQUEST Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water Division
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.,
~
t
~
~
~
l}
,
,
~
~
~
~
t
~
(
;RECEIVED
t~AR 1 4 2005
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Meridian Water Division
Facility Requireme.nts
Analysis Project
Prepared by BRS Architects
Februrary 16,2005
CLINTON M4I YAKA
1010 s~ Allante Place~ Suite 100
Boise, Ida/to 83709
Telephone 208 336-8370
Fa.t 208 336.8380
IV W w. brsarc/l itec ts~ cOIn
cl in t on@brsarchiteets.com
~~
&~
~
.
fijj(
~
t
t
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
w
~
c
o
wen
.S:
o
'-
Q)
ro
5;
c
co
:0
.;::
Q)
~
*+-
o
o
<3
~
....
Q)
'-C..c
.2!E
CJ :s
~~z
e~
0..<<1
~
en
=
-c1>>
Q) Q)
(iLL
OJ Q)
.0' :u
~ ::I
c...C"
UJ
1..
QJ
a..
...... c:
g 0
lL~
Q) Q)
:un..
::J
tT
UJ
~
(IJ
E
E
:J
(f)
~
ro
(j) N
~ =I:!: g to
..... N
t) ~
')(
W
~+:.-
~u:~O
en . 0 to
~-- CT C\I en
JjCl)--
I'-
L{)
c.o
~
~
.....
t:
CD
E
~
fa
c..
OJ
o
(I)
~ Q)
~~ g
Q) co
(j) ai
'Eo!S 1;
Q) C ro
E ~Q ~ 0
IDO ~
CJQJ o<:S
~E en
~ 81 I~
c.
I I
I'-
-.;-
('f)
N
~
<'!
LO
~
~
v
(0
~
0.
o
('t).clt)
LOWJ'..
COoN
N
co
e
c
o
()
c
~Q
t3 ~
Q) OJ
c: '""C
C co
o CD
o cc:
en \-
CIJ Q)
o <D
101 1:2:1
M
v
('f)
N
C'f)
N
LO
N
N
C')
N..
M
o
o
~
N
tJJ
co
Q)
~
C
o
E
E
o
()
o
N
1.0
~
~
LO
f'..
(V)
~
VJ
~
co
OJ
~
U
:::J
I~ I
to:
\,.,
II
C')
C
~
::I
_CO
c:
-C;
~
~
co
t-:
0:
~
m
.....
o
r-
L-
a
-+--'
U L-
~o
co
o rn
~- '+-
~
co c:
-0
::1._
o ........
L- to
.0 -S
co ~
w.u
~~
-0
get)
.. - VI
o~
c ~
00-
CD ()
oE
Cl~
~ -t;:
~ ( /..-: ~... .
1"
?~ \, .
~
~ N I
-
~
~
-
-
~
r
VJ VI
~ ~ ~
~ .L-
ea: fCi
~ E E
Q) Q)
0::: e:::
~
c
o
.w
.S:
(5
'-.
OJ
~
C
to
~
"c
CD
~
'+-
o
~
.......
(3
...
o <Ll
Q) 0
c..CCi
>..D.
f-t/'J
Q) u.. en
.... CI)""
fa c:
g... E E
tnQ)Q)m
- ~ I- ~=
m m:J
~ c~
o 0 d)
f- -l0:::
U)
+-'
~
Q) Q) <u (1)
uEffig'
RJCU::J......
~.: c- 0
en 5-U) ~
OJ
n::
Q)
+:
E
I:
o
E
U)
o
t1.
OJ
E
CO
z
OJ OJ Q.l
+--' ......... .......
ro CO CO
> > >
.t: .C .e
a...~D-
vcoco
N <0 CD
N~~
......;
c+-=...:
"55 "e .e
a..Q)Q)
::Ja.a.
rj)::l::::J
L-fJ)fJJ
JB1i5~
<tl CI) VJ
S:<c<(
~~ ~
...,
C c:
Q) c 0
EO(/,)
OJ ~ .-g
~<3 I ~
t: ~ C. ::::J
ca .sz :c ~
:!:O:::ULL
-0
W
L.
:J
U
Q)
en
~~Q)Q)
oO......~
.-- .- <t1 co
.0.0>>
::J :::J~L: +c:
OUCl.a-
oo~vro
~~<o<ogs
'- t-
O 0
.........., ~
ro rn
c c
:Ou -
L-i-..cro
000 :J
OOwO
OOl-L.
W(/)-JB
~oesg~
OO:=>>
~~~"r-I'-
06 ~
C/) ~m
Co ~:>. c ~ ""'0
:>t. L.. - CD -
;:;U)~ID=ro.:E
~Bcm<tm~
t: 41.- ~ ~- ~~ ~ tn
s:: t: "t: :Q E 0
04) ro C]) co ~
Ucn~I-.,1-
ci
Q)
c..
en
Q)
L.
fa
5-.... V
(/JZNQ)~
,.....LLN ~
m
....,
o
~
Ct)'-
mco
M NA
~
vLO
COCO
M c.o~
~
>.
+'
+:;
I::
ctJ
:J
a
~~-r-
Q)
o
ra
0.
tJ)
~
o
OJ
c.
~
}-
-o-c-c
OJ Q) ID
s..- L.. L..
::J =- :J
o 0 U
Q) Q) Q)
U)WifJ
Q)
o
ra
c..
en
t::
o
a.
a.
~
CI)
!J)
L-
a>
Q)
~
IDe
o co
C 1-.
~~
~:c~
cW.c
8iI3
Q)
c.>
co · ·
0.. C ....J
U) "Q <(
tc6 rol-
~~~aO
c.roQ)L...~
~&20Cl
o 0 Z
rorncn<3'<(
.......~L..On:::
~~~:?C)
e
.
.
I
t
t
.
t
t
D
t
t
~
~
t
t
~
t
~
,
~
P.
~
~
D
~
c
o
.U)
.:;
l5
1.-
Q)
~
c
ro
~
.C
Q)
2:
1+-
o
C
(]
~
OJ lL.. U)
to U)'E
g... E E
VJa.lQ)Q)
- Lf I- ~=
m en ~
..... cO-
O 0 OJ
J- ....J~
r/)
........
t:
CDC1>~~
o E ra ra
CGQ):I~
a. ~= 0" 0
rn &U) af
tV
a:::
~
o 8
Q) ra
C-a.
~(/)
GJ
:;::
E
c:
o
~
UJ
o
I:L
tU
E
m
z
(I)
..:.::
I....-
n:s
E
Q)
~
U)
~
L..
m
E
OJ
a:::
Q) Q) Q)
...... +-' +---
co co ro
> > >
'"C · C +i:
Q.a..n..
co~vco
~<OCO~
Q)
'--
ca:
:::J...
O"'GJo
UJQ)N
..-LL
fa
+-'
o
r--
~
tt-I
+:i
c:
fa
:::J
a
L.. C
.8 .2
o 13
~~~
en c VJ
c W c
Oro~
u~Q3
08u:
Q)
o
ro:
~
en
t+-
o
OJ
a.
~
I-
c
o
E
E
o
U
~~~C'1
c:
o
~
o
Q) --
C ro:
c 5 0
o '- ........
(j.......'- .c
tn E~ Q) Q)::S
U1 .., 1..... s..- UJ
or:(fi33
.... 0 0 ::l :J
UU-:.LLLL
OJ
CJ
co
Q..
fJ)
1::
o
~
a.
:::J
rn
w
u
co
u
en
ID
c
:0
co
()
(
0(0 I.O~
NM CJ)~
ID
o
m · ·
0. C...J
CJJ .Q <(
to<5 -ro....
2.~~ao
c...COIDI-f.--
~c%EOO
o 0 Z
rnroU)~<(
-+---.t-Is....O~
~~~~C)
~
~
I;
t
t
Ii
~
t
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
_!
~
-
~
~
;
t
~
j
w
~
;
~
i
c
o
.00
->
o
L-
a>
rn
~
c:
co
=0
.C
Q}
2
'+-
o
.c
U
v
OJ LL t/)
:; (1)1:
5-+-1 E E
U)QJQJ(]J
- ~ I- .:
co en :J
....., ce-
o 0 Q)
I- -1~
fIJ
~
c
Q) <Ll Q) Q)
oE<<i~
coQ):J+'
C. 1= tT 0
rJ) 5- (J) &
<P
~
CI)
,::,:
L..
R1
E
Q)
0::
...... tV
o (J
Q) m
0.0...
~(J)
Q)
+::
E
c:
o
:E
U)
o
~
OJ
E
ns
Z
c..
a.
o
...c:
if)
~S
-c
Q)
-a
::J
o
Q) C
L... .. -
:J t
"5LL
LLCfJ
Q)~~ Q)
~uO'+-'
co +- ~- co
>..0.0>
+c: ~ ::1 ..c
0..0 0 n...
COVCOO
~CD~~
"--""
L-
ID
C-
O
1-
Q.l
........,.
co
S
'+-
.Q2
..c
()
--r-
~""=t"~~
caa:.
U'J ()
r::;m ~
~2 c: 00 Q)
1Us8 ro
OJ..~ c:2:!2 >
g:E8IT:~ffi
CO:
o
~
.......;
c
.(ij
~
c6
en
C-
O
l'-
~
cu
+-'
o
....,
..0
::I
VJ
U)
~
...
fa
E
Q)
n:::
L-
a>
~
TI
e6
L-
ID
..c
en
co
1:
VJ
'L...
(])
~
o
...c
W
e
co
:t
C-1ijgvao
UJQ)~NOO
c;u..",C'\Jco"Q-
......,
o
I-
~
.......
+::
c
cu
::s
o
Q)
o
fa
0..
en
~
o
eLl
c..
~
Q)
o
m
a.
en
.....,
I.-
o
a.
CL
~
en
~~ ~
~
-0 -c "'"0 -c
=tV OJ Q) Q)
~ ...... L... L....
:J. :1 :J ":J
(.) 0 () 0
Q) Q) Q) Q)
fJJ(jJ(f)(fJ
E&
Q) 0 ~
u 0 0
c~+J
~L-cn
a.~ Q) ID
oc::~......
...couQ.)
(/)03~
VN
NM
<00
M~
ON
~v
NN
~LO
(ri
o
CO · ..
a. c ..J
(jJ .Q <t:
1::<<5 101-
8.~~~O
o..cc 0) t.-f-
::l 0... cue
~~6~~
jg~~o~
~~~~CJ
~
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,
~
~
~
c
o
.00
~>
o
~
Q)
~
c
co
:.0
.C
Q)
~
'+-
o
~
~
u
LO
Q) 1.1.. tJ)
tu (J)'E
g.... E E
wQ)<DQ>
- ~ I- ~=
ra Ol ::J
...... cO-
O 0 OJ
I- -l~
UJ
.....
C
Q)CUQ)W
C..)Emg'
rtlQ)::J""
~ ~= c-- 0
en 5- (I) ~
Q)
a:::
Q)
;:
E
c:
o
E
tI)
o
0..
CD
E
fa
Z
(. . ..
U)
~
I..
CO
E
OJ
"
co
~
<C
Q)
-+---
CO
>
.'=
a...
~ Q)
o CJ
OJ m
c.Q.
~(J)
Q) (]) Q)
t3uTI
:c:c:.c
:::J ::::J :J
UOC)
(CCOCO
MC0M
s.-
ID
-0 .
ro L- ~
Q) Q) Q)
a:::-o~
CO CO
L- Q) Q)
2a:::oc
Q) L.... S-..:
2Q)Q)
· (jj a>
c/):2:~
~~~
(I)
~g
~"E _
m E ~ E
Q) ::s "m W
ct:()..c.~
I... en >,
CD ~.- c
~ L.... E c
CD co co co
~Of-O
co
o
~
cr)
Cii
...
o
.......
.c
:I
en
:/"""
VI
~
L...
nJ
E
OJ
0::
OJ
L....
ro
::J.....
c- Q) CD co
UJQ)('t')('f)
~LL
ctJ
...,
o
~
NO
f'..CO
'T"""""
VV
l{)C0
N
>.
lfi-I
;:;
t:
cu
::J
o
~~
OJ
o
co
0-
CI)
't-
o
OJ
~
>,.
J-.-
c: c:
o 0
E E
E E
o 0
00
OJ
o
fa;
a...
en
t::
o
C-
o.
::s
UJ
c
~Q
10
+-t
UJ
s-
a>
'5 L..
Q.ID
Ec
o -c:
Uo..
ill
u
ro · ·
c.. c~
en .Q <c
-ec6 ro)-
8.~~BO
c..COWL...1-
::J c.. c: t5 c
~~6~~
!9J9~o~
~~~~Cl
~
~
t
P
t
~
t
t
~
-
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,
,
;
~
~
c
o
-en
.:;
Q
L,..
Q)
CO
~
c
ro
~
Wi::
Q)
~
\t-
O
~
............
6
(0
Q) LL U)
ffi WE
~.. E E
cnQ)Q)Q,l
- ~ I- .:
m C) :J
15 sg
J- ...In:
U)
~
s:::
cu(1)f!~
oEmcu
(UQ):::J......
a..: C" g
en ~ CIJ LL.
CD
0::
UJ
.:s::
L.
co
E
Q)
~
'+--
o QJ
Q) ()
c.,cu
~a.
I-Cf)
Q)
;
E
t:
o
;e
U)
o
~
Q)
E
cu
z
I::
o
E
E
o
u
(is
m en
t: m
Q) ~
e><
In
.:z::
....
ra
E
Q)
0::
-0
Q)
~
co
0::
J
~
u:
\-
Q)
32
C
"L:
c..
(j)
Q)
L..
u::
o
Z
Q)
1M.
m
::s...
C"GJQOOOOcooo
U)mOOl.{)tDoMLOO
-LLCllONNM N
fa
...,
o
f-....
~
......
+:;
E::
Cts
~
a
~~--r-~N~~~
Q)
o
ra
C4
(J)
-.....
o
G)
c..
~
J--
-c6"05E6""06
~ E ~ E E E ~ E
5 E 5 E E E a E
Q) 0 Q) 0 0 0 Q) 0
lfJOUlOUO(})U
G>
U
cu
0-
m
~
o
c-
o.
:3
en
E
o
o
n::E
IDO .b(J)
== 0 c..E
LLn::<:{g-oS-L...Q)
OC:S~ClcneO(])~
o..CO<(==1i)::::2:L...
rn~oroQ)~Q).8
~cocn:2:n:::JCf)(Jj
(.
co
co
v_
N
CON
vM
t-"!.
M
Qj
u
~ g ....J
~06 ~~
8.~..30
a.rn'Qiel-
::l 0.. C C3 Q
wen c z
romg*<(
~......1.....Do::
~~~c.;?C)
..:.. :r: ::.::..:i:. :::.. :;..: :::; .:: .. :..:...: \.:. :;.. ::.. \. ..: . .
I:...:::.....:.;\:::..i..:.:.....:....: .
1>.:. .
It
11
t
-
t
~
D
~
~
~
~
,
~
~
~
~
~
t
;
~
~
t
t
t"--
U)
~
I-
eo
E
Q)
n:
......
o <D
Q) (J
c..ra
>.0-
}-UJ
Q) u. U)
; (I)"E
~... E E
VJG>Q)Q)
- tf }- .:
ca 0) :3
... cO-
O 0 GJ
f- ....J~
UJ
....
t:
Q) OJ Q) Q)
t)E:U~
ttSC>>::J""
0.. ~!:: C"' 0
fJ) 5- tJ) ~
OJ
a:::
QJ
=
E
:e::
o
+:i
I;
o
a..
c
0
ROO
~>
0
L...
ID
m
~
c
CO
:.0
.C
Q)
~
'+- Q)
0
C E
CU
U z
rJ)
~
I..
fIJ
E
Q)
r.t:
>.
CO
CO
..c
()
CO
W
..........
CO
CO
N
OJ
.....
eu
::s 0
o-+-'N
," Q) LO
V~ OJ R
IIIIMMIU.~
ra ~
+-'
o
~
~
......
+::
t: 0
m V
::s
a
QJ
CJ
m
a.
en
..... -c
o P2
Q) ::::J
a. u
>- ID
J- (f)
Q)
CJ
ta
a.
t./)
t
o
CL
a.
::s
UJ
r.n
~
co
en
~
u
:J
,::
~,
I ~
a
N
Ul
~
~
Qj
u
co . IL
a. C-.I
CI) .2 <(
t~ rol-
Om SO
8:~tj ef-
:J a.c(3o
men c z
roro~*<c
ooQj~a::
f-I--O-+C)
.~.~It-:;rlJ=F~I.~iJ~r~~,.~r.~.~6~r_~~~'7.F.ma~'~';'T? <U.
\. .. .
t:':3~:.
ll~
t....~.....
Th~;Y1
f::::;:.:~::. :;::::: i .. .~:! }:;::.:: ':::..: ::: .:...:::i...::.... :... . .:i:: ::.... .. :
.>.: ;:..: .:. ~ ..~.: ct. .:..>... .. : ... :..... :. ..:. .
'.".:::.:-;:.::.:.;..~ sg-:...:.. ..... ... ..: ..
... trf .. .
,;):..:...::::..:::.;.:' S.u...:.. . .
........ ~..
...::.:...:... ~:.
. .: : tT1
Z
1-J
~
~
~
I
J
I
I
J:
k
~
8
-,.-., .........
IC\ - DIIIl
i....-..
-
--
: ,. '. .. '^H ^ ... ........ ---..JiIl "It:.A'P" ~47 'j'" . 47 ...~ ~.., ~., ~.., .., :., ...., ~." ~., '." :..., ... ~ ..... ..... .., .., .". ~ ..... ., ...... ..., .~ "fir ""'" '€IV "(JIir 1D' .... ill' .. ~
94. "'8~
~
en
! .
0,
!
~
~
:
r'" .-... J
.
!
~
~
I
1
I
~
~
! ~ I~
t 1- "U ~ 8 I
~ q (f} I' z 11~~z'~ _ ~
! ::; ~ t
1 ~ ~~ i
. qcTl 1
~ ~ ~
! IN i
l._ ____ _: !
~ ~
i f -~~__J
1 ;
! COMP ·
I 6'-~6'~6" !
:. t
I i
~ .
: '.~
! .
! i
~ ~
f----- ~ :
! I
! :
1 l
j ~.I~!
~ mO ~
~ ;> ~
! ~:
; ~:
i \
~ ~
: !
~ I
~---------------:: !
: f- ~~~~-- - -- ---~
I ~
l j
t..___ -~---- - -------~i !
: 1
~ I
[gJ
I I
~------------~---- -----------~~J
L.tltll
~I
"0
x-o
.J;:..
~
tyg:
om
~M
liAJ
x(,/)
~d
!.;u
O~
Ie;:)
-. ......... ........&&...&.ow .&.or "1""1' ..... r"'I" r"'I" 1"1"'I'" .... .... ~ ... _ _ -..&& .&.&,
~
~
.
.
:
~
~
~
L
---,
~
I
.
.
:
.
!
!
1
HALL WA Y #2
.....~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'iI5IiiiJI" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .....-:pr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1IItIP' ~ ~ "iaI'" ~ "'"47 ~ ~ "'IfliZI' "'IIi:iii.Y "IIii;III'" ~ ~ "r,qIf' ~ ~ ~ ~ '=' ~ ~ ~ "t5'" ~
!~ !~ !~ !g
~~ ~~ ~-l ~~
1ItI1 .tr1
~~ ....r-- ....t-t i~
4tm ~trJ
tr:1 ~ ~ tJj
~ <
~ 0 ~ ~
z a
z
i I i I
lC
!: , ~ !:
I
-~~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT~ \V A TER DIVISION
ZUllI&( iMH 8TP1!1rr t-I!IaCtAIi, ~
- -- DIll
. CI:IfI ..... -=--L DCX:\ .... ...,
~ iln..- ..
~J~
ARC HrTECTS
C...
CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE
Project Name Meridian Public Works
Water Division
Main Building 10,630 sf
2200 Earthwork
3300 Cast In Place Concrete
4200 Unit Masonry
5100 MetaJs
6100 Carpentry
6400 Architectural Woodwork
7200 Building Insulation
7240 EIFS
7 400 Manufactured Roofing
7 460 siding
7500 Single Ply Membrane Rfg.
8100 Metal Doors & Frames
8200 Wood Doors~ H.M. Frames
8300 Overhead Doors
8400 Entrances & Storefronts
9250 Gypsum Board Assemblies
9300 Tile
9500 Acoustical
9650 Resilient Flooring
9680 Carpet
9900 Painting
10150 Toilet Compartments
1 0500 Lockers
10800 Toilet & Bath Accessories
15300 Fire Protection
15400 Plumbing
15500 HVAC
16000 Electrical
Main Building Total
Storage Bldgs. 10,970 sf
3300 Cast In Place Concrete
13212 PreEngineered Steel Structures
Storage Bldgs. Total
Estimate Totals
Labor
Material
Subcontract
Project Total
C. .
2/14/2005
19,255
65,466
104,356
12,837
921477
19} 158
13,209
20~976
33, 193
6,581
14,748
3,864
23,608
5,434
28,827
101 ,284
20,433
13t411
1 ,446
13, 712
15, 188
6, 341
4,722
4,660
21 J 180
52,980
68} 1 07
111 , 097
898,550
39,741
99,353
139,094
31 , 849
65, 770
940,025
1,037)644
c.:, .
( .
April 8, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
April 12, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-A
REQUEST Approve Minutes of March 15, 2005 Pre-Council Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY AlTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DE?T:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
(n.n...... ..
(-
\~
Meridian City Pre-Council Meetina
March 15~ 2005
The Meridian City Pre-Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 P~M. on
Tuesday, March 15,2004 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle and
Charlie Rountree.
Staff Present Brad Watson, Rick Clinton, Ken Bowers, Bill Musser, Doug
Strong, Bill Nary and Will Berg~
lIe m 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X Christine Donnell
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
x
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Bird: Mr~ President~
Wardle: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we adopt the agenda as published.
Rountree: Second.
Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda as published~ All in
favor say aye~
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 3.
Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water
Division:
Watson: ML President, Mayor and Council members I first of all really appreciate
being able to get on a pre-council agenda, I know your time is limited with all the
other stuff going on these days~ This has been something that has been rolling
around in our court for 12 to 18 months as the Water Department has expanded
to keep up with its demands~ It has added staff to the point where we have really
run out of room at the facility on northwest 8th Street to the point where people
are staged in the breakroom. That's kind of their workspace at this point and
time. As most of you will recall from our budget presentation last summer and
Councilmember Donnell, of course, wasn't here, we talked about this for quite a
while. We had proposed an enhancement of $1.2 million dollars to go forward
t..:..
(~,...
\,
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15, 2005
Page 2 of9
with a design and possibly construction this budget year. BRS was not quite
done with the analysis at that time~ They had really just a preliminary draft that I
think that we mayor may not have showed you, I can't remember quite honestly.
In the time since then they have put together their finals base analysis and I
believe you have those little red books with you up there. It shows space
requirements in tabular form as well as conceptual floor plan, some elevations, a
conceptual site plan and then at the end some cost estimates~ The one thing to
point out about the preliminary site plan is it really won't work right now~ From
the time when they drafted this until now I have had several conversations with
Mr. Dennis Griffin of BSU, who oversees the lineman school vQ-tech program at
this site and if you want me to I can go back into the history of why that particular
program is there and how that all transpired, but the long and short of it is they
really don't have any immediate plans to relocate from that facility~ Their current
lease expires in 2018 with I believe in it their option to extend that to another ten
years. This is essentially a free site for them. I am not sure why they would want
to relocate if they are getting this for free; if (inaudible) preventing them from
moving to the West Valley Campus. So ML Griffin told me that they were going
through a master planning effort right now, but that it looked like that some of the
other programs would be taking precedence at West Campus~ So, what Rick
and I have done in the couple of weeks since we have gotten this is put together
some site options. Maybe I am premature in jumping into those4 If you have any
questions, please feel free to interrupt me at this point~ I will back up just a little
bit and talk about last summer when we presented this to you, there seemed to
be a consensus from Council that the existing building was a problem, mostly
because of some environmental issues that were discovered there. Just some of
the site constraints with where it was located because we had talked about
expansion of that existing building, but it seemed like from the discussion that we
had that we didn't receive that direction. What we have handed out to you and
what is showing on the screen is what we are calling option one~ This was the
first one that we thought of and what you see in the yellow cross (inaudible)
markings is the space that BSU occupies in the yard. They have power lines,
power poles, other little structures that they go out and train on when their
sch.ools are in session. They also occupy the classroom in the southwest corner
of the existing building~ Anyway, this was option one that we looked at, where
customer parking would be off of Chateau. There would be a small parking lot
there4 The building would be situated in this general area. We would have
somehow be able to coordinate a pathway through the front of this and then
ultimately through the park; howeverf Rick Clinton spoke with the coordinator of
the program about taking just 50 feet into their existing yard area and was
essentially told uno, we need that area for trainingU~ So, we went back to the
drawing board and tried to squeeze in -
Rountree: Bradf how specific is the lease arrangement? Does it say this fenced
area or this legal description? Does it require that the city provide a room for the
training, or do we just do that because of whatever? Is it that specific?
c.. ..
C.
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15, 2005
Page 3 of 9
Watson: Councilman Rountree I believe it is fairly specific. J don't know that it
gets down to actual square footage in the yard. We will answer that here in a
minute, I think as Rick looks through the actual lease.
Rountree: If it's not tied down that specific, we got wiggle room then. We ought
to leverage that to our advantage.
Watson: We can certainly look into that. Hopefully we have an answer here
before I am done with this. The second option that we looked at, which is
essentially is mirroring the project over here to have less of an impact on - they
have a Jot of poles up in this corner, but they also have a few in the southwest
corner of the site. This is not feasible either because they don't want to move
anything~ So, this was a very short-lived option that we looked at The third
option that we have examined is quite a bit different. It moves the structure south
into the park with still some - this would actually now be employee parking
coming off Chateau - some employee parking - because the shop is located at
the rear of the facility - we tried to square off the park, so to speak so that the
space that is predominantly used, at least that I see on a somewhat regular basis
living in the neighborhood is in this open area between the trees. So, we tried to
square that off and preserve that. Again, with all these options we would like to
somehow at least maintain some areas so that a pathway could be connected
from the Five Mile Creek area, through the park and into the main part We also
are somewhat constrained by an existing sewer trunk that comes through the
site. There is always the possibility that that could be moved somewhat, but right
through this area where my cursor is, we have existing vehicle covered storage,
covered parking and we can't really move the sewer one way or the other. There
is structures on each side. Anyway, those are the three options that we are
presenting. Of course, the fourth option is what is showing BRS's report and that
involves demolishen of this building, demoJishen of the existing shop and
infringing up into this area and all the while providing room for BSU to continue
their lineman school program. It would also involve temporary relocation of the
Water Department or - we just threw this out here, maybe portables, but I am not
sure that that is really even feasible given the site constraints. What we are here
tonight to do, I guess, is to get a little bit of direction on or any feedback or input
on what Mayor and Council would like us to do. We are at a point where, again,
employees are overflowing that structure~ BSU doesn't appear to be going
anywhere. We have briefly last year looked at the possibility of relocating to
another siteJ but given the price of commercial land in the city, this just seems the
most cost effective. We already own the ground and obviously land costs would
be zero. Rick and J met with Doug Strong yesterday afternoon and went over
this and not sure that there are any strong opposition, but of course Doug is here
tonight and he can speak to that if you have any questions. Strong, vehement
opposition - how about that? (Inaudible-----).
Wardle: Council any questions that come to mind?
(~.~-,....:
(~-'..':
Merjdian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15, 2005
Page 4 of9
Rountree: Mr~ President. Brad, you have a strong preference for coming off of
Chateau to access - is that just because of the site or there is some advantage
to that?
Watson: Mr. President, Councilman Rountree there is some advantage to it
This parking lot really gets full when the Va-tech school is in session and all the
employees are at the Water Department to the point where there is sometimes -
I don't know if it ever - it's tapped out completely, but one or two parking spots.
If we could free up some and this was something that I was just playing around
with. There may be an opportunity to put more in up there, but we are trying to
alleviate the pressure on this parking lot by having some access off of Chateau~
Rountree: To my first point. Is parking a provision of the lease?
Clinton: Mr~ President, Councilman Rountree without the ability to actually run a
meets and bounds description it appears to me that like pretty much what Brad
has crossed hatch, there is whafs described in the lease, I guess, specifically I
don't see that the lease provides us or requires us to provide additional parking
or classroom. It does require us to provide a classroom and J think that that's
one of the things that's really relevant to this project is that the new building does
not include space for BSU, so if we tear down the existing building we will need
to revises this building drawing and add on to it, so that there is adequate space
for BSU in the new buiJding~
Rountree: I have a question for Doug, Mr. President. Do you know if there is
any LWC monies in 8th Street Park at all that we would - if we did this that we
would have to replace the land?
Strong: Mr. President, Councilman Rountree I am not aware of any land and
water money at all in 8th Street Park. I think the only park we have that
(inaudible) is in Storey.
Rountree: Okay that is good news.
Watson: Mr. President.
Wardle: Brad.
Watson: Councilman Rountree just to follow up on that. ItJs our understanding
that that land was purchased with the previous wastewater treatment plant that
was built out there and that just coincidentally it was turned into a park and the
wastewater plant was abandoned in the ~70's~
Wardle: Brad, J have got a follow up question. If we are not talking about
replacing the existing building, which has got some issues with it - environmental
\,.- . :
/.~. ..
(. .
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15,2005
Page 5 of 9
issues and then we are going to build a new building on the northern portion of
this or western portion, I guess. What are we going to do with the old building?
Watson: Mr~ President I think for the time being it would still continue to serve as
BSU's classroom and facility until such time that they reJocate~ I think once it's
raised then we can possibly expand the parking for the park down there or by
that time we would probably need more vehicle storage or thirdly just expand the
green space out there. I am sorry, Mr. Clinton just reminded me that one of the
ideas that we are throwing around is that the Park's Department could in the
interim use the vacated space that BSU is not using for maybe some satellite
operations or whatever Doug would be interested in~
De Weerd: ML President~
Wardle: Madame MayoL
De Weerd: I guess I would like to leave option one and two open so we preserve
Park space if we can - if I can talk to the administration and get a portion of that
grayed out area for utilization of our needs. Rick who was the one - did BSU
participate in the classes of repair since most of the damage happened above
their classroom?
Clinton: Madame Mayor currently the repairs have not been done~ That's one of
the follow ups that we would like out of this is if the building is going to stay then
we do need to re-roof the building and repair those leak damages~
De Weerd: I guess regardless if with our agreement, the building appears to
need to stay and J guess my question is will they participate in the cost of that
repair?
Clinton: From what I can read of the lease, they are required to pay their costs
for utilities, but not for building maintenance.
De Weerd: What a great deal that was~
Rountree: Do they make that payment?
Clinton: No sir.
Rountree: That's what I thought. So, they are delinquent~
De Weerd: I guess there are a number of things that I could .talk to their
administration about and we can meet about that aftelWards~ When we were
talking about a certain area and if it would be appropriate for the Water
Department to relocate to, we also looked at a possible partnership with Parks~
This seems to set up a great opportunity in the future when that other building is
(~...
Meridian City Pre-Councir Meeting
March 15, 2005
Page 6of9
vacated by BSU as a possible location for the Park's Department maintenance
crew and that there could be some sharing of equipment and that sort of thing
that certainly the Water Department and the ParkJs Department might have in
common use for. So, is that a future consideration? Would that be a good
partnership between those two departments at some future time?
Watson: ML President, Madame Mayor I think that would be a great situation.
The only caveat is that there is certain things and I am not talking about the yard,
but more the facilities themselves, the building. There are some security issues
that we have talked about before that would preclude recreation classes or those
sorts of things in this building - in the newer building9 As to the yard, I am not
sure, you know. Doug and Rick would just have to get together or Elroy and Rick
or whatever and work those things out, but maybe if we have a joint backhoe
someday we can share that.
De Weerd: I was thinking that, but since you are the enemy and I wasn't going to
suggest it.
Wardle: Brad I have a couple of individual thoughts for consideration and one it
appears to me that we are looking at making this move for two reasons. One
because we have some needs of the department and secondly because we have
a deficient facility and so what I am seeing is with options one, two and three
essentially addressing only one of those issues and not the other and in doing
that we are changing the configuration of this entire layout and entering from an
(inaudible) portion of the neighborhood and so that is a consideration that I think
we need to take into account and then secondly I would like to see some costs of
what it would cost to demolish that building and start over, understanding that we
would need through our arrangement to add a classroom portion to that. It
appears to me that if we build a new building and then leave that then we are
going to have to deal with it sometime in the future regardless.
Watson: Mr. President just so I am clear, you are speaking of the environmental
concerns in the existing building as not being addressed?
Wardle: Yesf because what I am hearing is not only is it too small for our current
use, but we would need to because of the environmental concerns look at either
repairing it, demolishing it or doing something if we were to stay in that - any
department long term even if it were to be Parks.
Watson: Mr. President you are correct the roofing that Mayor and Mr~ Clinton
were just talking about would address at least preventing future problems, but
there would be some remediation of the existing building to make it occupiable,
but better. So, yeah, we don't have those costs~
Donnell: Mr. President.
("
(__m.
\.... .
Meridjan City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15,2005
Page 7of9
Wardle: Ms. Donnell.
Donnell: Brad as I look at this and this is the first time that J have had a chance
to look at the architect's report - J have a couple of questions. Number one, I am
assuming that there is money in the city budget for such a structure?
Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Donnell, yes.
Donnell: Since I am new at this, I was not sure if that was the case, but I
assumed you wouldn't be bringing it forward unless there was and secondly I am
curious about why there is locker rooms and showers in the facifity?
Watson: Councilmember Donnell just as we have at the Wastewater Plant, the
operators are out in things that are better left unsaid and when they come back in
at the end of the day or end of the shift, we usually provide those facilities so that
they can change out of their overalls and get cleaned up before they get in there
car and head home.
Donnell: Thank you.
Wardle: Council any further questions for Brad?
Bird: Mr. President.
Wardle: ML Bird.
Bird: My one comment is you know that old buildingf I don't know how you would
salvage that thing because it's not that good of a building. I think we need to
press forward and get it done. The longer you wait, the more the cost of the
construction is going to be. Decide what you want to do, bring it back to us and
get it done. Thafs my opinion.
Rountree: Mr. President.
Wardle: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Brad, what more direction did you need other than that I support the
project and did in the budget and I do now. The Mayor, I believe, wants to have
an opportunity to talk to BSU about maybe moving them a little bit on what it is
they need. If we can get that resolvedf is that sufficient for you to move forward
with the project?
Watson: Mr. President, Councilman Rountree yes I believe it is. It just sounds
like there are a few loose ends, a few questions that came from Council that will
get answered and speak with the Mayor about option one and / or two and I think
( .. ..:
(... .
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15,2005
Page 8 of9
we have enough to move forward with developing a scope of services with BRS,
with the exact location a little bit gray at this moment.
Rountree: It seems like the need may be there to repair the existing building and
may want to compare that cost versus the cost of the whatever classroom you
might have to add to accommodate the lease because as I recall the expense of
repairing that roof was not a small dollar amount. Then look at your time log.
How long are you going to have to occupy that building before you add a new
structure?
Wardle: Just a follow up. Brad. That was kind of one of the things that I was
getting at is jf we are going to incur two expenses then it could be incorporated
into the newer facility long term plan.
Watson: All right. I understand.
De Weerd: Mr. President.
Wardle: Madame Mayor.
De Weerd: J guess what we can do is in follow up, first if we could get a copy of
the lease to our city attorney for his review and we can find out about the lease
and any maintenance costs that our partners are responsible to. We can take a
look at that and then I can approach them. I do think that we do need to move
forward on the new construction, but whether that building is something that we
want to keep or not, we need to take a look at that and we need to move forward
with those repairs if that is the direction we need to go. We have been fortunate
to have a pretty - fortunate or unfortunate that we have had a dry winterJ but we
do need to take care of that.
Watson: Thank you very much.
Wardle: Thank you Brad. If there is nothing else that brings us to the end of our
Pre-Council agenda, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Rountree: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Wardle: It's been moved to adjourn. All those in favor say aye.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
c...... .
Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting
March 15, 2005
Page 9 of 9
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:55 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
DATE TIME TO/FROM
03/11 17:08 3810160
03/11 17:09 PUBLIC WORKS
03/11 17:10 8841159
03/11 17:11 2088840744
03/11 17:12 POLICE DEPT
03/11 17:13 8985501
03/11 17:14 LIBRARY
03/11 17:15 92083776449
03/11 17:16 3886924
03/11 17:17 P-AND-Z
03/11 17:17 208 895 0390
03/11 17:18 1283000~0
AS OF M~R 11 '05 17:19 PAGE~01
(.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MODE
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
G3--5
MIN/SEC PGS
00' 38 ,. 001
1210' 26" 001
00'28u 001
00'27u 001
00'26n 001
00' 261' 001
00'32u 001
00' 26'1 001
001 26'1 1301
00' 27 'J 001
00J26" 001
00' 313" 001
CMD~ STATUS
1324 OK
1324 OK
024 OK
1324 OK
024 OK
024 OK
024 OK
024 OK
024 OK
024 OK
1324 OK
024 OK
----~------~---------------------------------------------------------------~----------------
· r/CCiM
.~ l'P;)
J~~$~~k~
(~n-'f .O)F i:iil!-.f'ti-.j: .
. ~~ ~
eridlCrJiJ~. ...~'~
IJ).\HO .f
~
MAYOR
Tall\nlY de We~rd
m~
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
\^Jjlliall1 L. M4 Nary
Kejth Bird
Cha rl~~ M. ]~l"ul'lrcc
$) I~)ll rl Wnrd I~~
Crrv D ~l~A K rMJ:!N "rs
r: i rc
540 I~. }7ri1 n k ljn r~.};}cJ
8$8..1234/ fax 895-0390
P;J rks &.. R~crt;'a tivn
11 r~. Bow~~r Str..~ct
RRR.~~r;7Y I (~X Ht)8~5501
Pl o~, n l ng & 2001 t'g
6bt) E~ W Q tcrtower Lalle
Slli re 202
8S'1..553J I fax 888-6854
1150+ -IOY j/LAb[i (! !UO+l~
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian will hold a Pre...Council Meeting at City Council Chambers,
Meridian City Halll 33 East Idaho Avenue. Meridian. Idahot on Tuesday,
March 15, 2005 at 6:30 P.M.. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled Ci ly Counci I
meeting as well as the following issue:
Pol i~~t:t
140 I 1:.. w a ~11 rtllW~l. L..~n(!
88R"(1n7H I (iI x 1146.7366
P11 bl i~ Works
660 E. WateTto,v~r J ral'~
S\' i t~ 200
S98~5 ;[)(ll (0 x 898-9551
- Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water
Division
The pUblic is welcome to attend the meeting.
- B\'ildillg
660 E~ vV a t~rtuwE!r Lan~
Suite ) 50
RR7 ..2211 f lilX SS7-12tJ7
DATED this 1 Oth day of March, 2005.
~ Scw~r (WWTP)
..1401 N ~ Ten ~rile Road
8BH~2.191 J (ClX 884-0744
~ W;\ ter
2235 N. w. 9th StT(JL~:t
888..52421 f~lX 8H4...) 1SlJ
CITY HALL 33 ~AST IDAHO AVENUE MErUn'AN~ IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
t"ri". ...\ .FJ~K - f~\X KKH442l H HlIA'^N RESOURCl!S -l:^X SB.ft.$ 723 IlIN^NC:r: ~ lfTJLITY eJLLINli -11\X 687 .4R!;~ ~,~\'TORts OFJ:lCU-I^X RR 4-,.0 ! ] f)
(.
/~
(
AS OF MAR 11 '05 17:27 PAGE~01
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDtt STATUS
01 03/11 17:20 208 387 6393 EC--S 00' 26'~ 001 024 OK
02 03/11 17:20 ADA CTY DEUELMT EC--S 00J 35" 001 024 OK
03 03/11 17=22 8885052 EC--S 00' 27" 001 024 OK
04 03/11 17=23 CHERRY LANE G3--S 0'0' 43'" 001 024 OK
135 03/11 17=24 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00'27" 001 024 OK
06 03/11 17:25 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00' 271' 001 024 OK
07 03/11 17=26 2088886701 EC--S 00; 26" 0131 024 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
."~1\rA~
crry (JF ~~t .~.
e rldlf:;r1i~;. <~'~
t'
lJ).\HO /
~ fJ/f.a~
/--6v+ --IOY l'iAbL; f! AJo-hl~
~ il~
Mh '(OR
Tal11n1Y de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMB ERS
Willial11 Lt M. Nary
Keith Bjl~d
Ch~rJ~~ M. l~Ol.rl'ltCC
5] l~J IIII W~rd I\~
NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
Cl~rY D 1:[~AK fM i:N~rS
Pir~
5411 1!4 ]":ri! n 1, Ijn 1~ [)il d
8$8-1234/ fax S9S~0390
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
P\1\lks &. R~cr~(lrti\Jr'
11 rz. Howe r Street
RRR-357~ I (a~ RtJH,-5S(Jl
Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Council Chambers,
Meridian City Hall. 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idahot on Tuesday,
March 15J1 2005 at 6:30 P~M.. The Meridian City Council will be
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
Pln.,nlng & Z~1nj)'g
bot) E. W.J lcrtower Lane
Sltite 202
SSJ!.553J I fax 888-6854
meeting as wen as the following issue:
Pol it.:~
l40 I C4 Waterttlw~t t.ilne
RR~~..n';7H I fax H4(i...736(,
- Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water
Division
Public lA' 0 Ltks
660 E. Wa terto\v.f!r I ...a\~~
Sl) 1 t~ 200
S98~55(}(ll (a x 898..9551
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
.. I3tlild iJ1g
6GO E t W a tE!rtuw~ r Lpne
Suitt1 ] so
RR7~2211 / fax HH7..1297
DATED this 10th day of March. 2005.
w ScwC!.r (WWTP)
3401 N . Ten Mile Road
888-2191/ (ax 884-0744
~ \N~ ter
2235 N. w. ~th Strt~~t
888...5242/ T,lX SH4..115Y
CITY tlALL 33 E AS.J. 11)AHO AV EN UE
'.4,lr\1 lJ 11:.11 K - J~\X H HR..42 ] Ii, H1J^li\N RES OUR.C~S -P,\~X 8S'~.8 723
tvtERID IAN, ID^HO 83642 (20R) 888-"4433
J~I~^Nr:R .& tlTIL1TY BILllNU -ltAX 68 7 ~4R 1:1 ~\11\'fOR'S Or:~lC~...It\X RS4.K I ] ~}
'-- ... r .... .
\
** TX CONF I RMAT ION REPORT ** AS OF MAR 11 '05 18:01 PAGE.fd1
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM t10DE MIN/SEC PGS CMDn STRTUS
as 03/11 17:40 PUELIC WORKS EC--S 00'21tt 001 028 OK
139 03/11 17:41 12084664405 EC--S 00t 21 It 001 028 OK
10 03/11 17:42 8841159 EC----S 00" 21 n 001 028 OK
11 03/11 17:43 2088840744 EC-S 0BJ22:11 001 028 OK
12 ~/11 17:43 POLICE DEPT EC-S 00J21U 001 B28 OK
13 03/11 17=44 8985501 EC--S 00' 20U 001 1328 OK
14 03/11 17:45 LIERARY EC--S e0' 23 n 001 028 OK
15 03/11 17:46 92aS3776449 EC--S 00'.2011 001 028 OK
16 03/11 17:47 3886924 EC--S 00~ 21 u 001 028 OK
17 03/11 17:48 P-AND-Z EC--S 00~21tt 01211 028 OK
18 03/11 17:48 208 895 8390 EC--S e0t21U e01 028 OK
19 03/11 17: 49 128300048 03--5 00t 2S,1 001 1328 OK
28 03.111 17=50 200 387 6393 EC--S 00t 21 'U 1301 028 OK
21 03/11 17:51 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC-S 00~ 21" 001 028 OK
22 03/11 17=52 8885852 EC-5 00~21" ~al 028 OK
23 03/11 17:53 CHERRY LANE G3--S ~0~ 38" 001 028 OK
24 03/11 17:54 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--..rS eat 21" 001 028 OK
25 03/11 17:55 10 PRESS TRIEUNE EC....-S 00' 21'H 001 028 OK
26 03/11 17:56 2088886701 EC--S 00t21U eel 028 OK
28 03/11 18:01 381016'0 EC--S 001 28'" eel 028 OK
-------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------
~-eO'Jt' .Po~i fa. VuJob ~ ~,d'tt.C{.:~ ~nr.J~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE..COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1.. RolI..call Attendance:
- Shaun Wardle ~ Christine Donnell
- Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoptlon of the Agenda:
3. Update On Space AnalysIs and Concept Plan for the Water Division:
it" ~pproXimate aJlowable time set. for agenda item may change depending on
dlscussion_ Please use the deSIgnated minutes as a guideline only.
. Meridian City Pre-Council Agenda - Man:h 15~ 2005 Page 1 of 1
AU matenaJs presented at public meetings snail become property ofth8 City Of Meridian.
Anyone d~rln9 accommodation for d;sabHffies related to documenls and/or hearings
Please conlact the City C!erk1s Office at 888-4433 at feast 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC me~ung.
-::"
erldzCrn J~; ~\,
;.. ]DAHO ;
~ (f:.\. /-
f 1:/ t l' I~~ Tu l: . \-0.;, t.l U _ V ...UJ. ."'\
MAYOR
Talnmy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M.. Nary
Kei t]1 B i l~d
C11al.les M. ROll"ntree
Shillln Ward le
NOTICE OF PRE~COUNCIL MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CITY DEPAI{TM"ENTS
Fire
540 E4 Franl<liIl Road
888-1234/ fax 895-0390
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Council Chambers,
Parks & RecI.catiol1
1 J" E4 Bowel. Stl~eet
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridianf Idaho, on Tuesday,
March 15, 2005 at 6:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be
Planning & Zoning
660 E. W ate]~to\\rer LaJ1e
Strite 202
884-5533 / fax 888-6854
discussing agenda items which are on the regular scheduled City Council
meeting as well as the following issue:
Police
1401 E4 W a tertoV\reI~ Lalle
888-6678/ fax 846-7366
-- Update on Space Analysis and Concept Plan for the Water
Division
IJ1tblic Works
660 E. W aterto,,;el~ La.t1e
Stt i te 200
898-5500 / fax 898-9551
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
- Building
660 E. W atel~tovver Lane
Sllite 150
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
- Sewer (WWTP)
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191/ fax 884-0744
,~. ~~j~~~~i.~fi;;:;~~~~?~~fj _
..,l~l;' Or ~~.~...,,;t'~.J.' $-l~~
~:~~~~ ~~:. ~::::::~4~,. ~~)Yb: '
I~ 6.~~~pa~Jf .:! #if~. .~*
~ :-. r ~~ ~:
~ ." '~ " ~
DATED this 10th day of March, 2005.
S Ji~ .~~ ~'h .;~-,:
- WateJ~
2235 N. W. 8 tl1 S tl~ee t
888-5242 / fax 884-1159
crrv HALL 33 EAST ID/\HO t\VENUE rvIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
Clrr\~ CLEI'{K ...I~"\X 888.421 R l"lU:\!/\N Ill:S()ljllCES ~ I~I\X 884.8 72 3 r:IN/\NCE & LJ~rILI.r'{ 13IL~L~[N(;.... J~I\X 887 -4R l3 ~],\"OI~~S or:J~JCE-11\X 884-81l9
... ~ ... ~
...... ...... ...... .......
......
......
..........
.~ ' /: ^ :..;~, ~~
...... ~ / ... ... --=/
-::. : --:.... :
.../ -::. .../
...... ......
... ... ... ..:
; ......
~
... ;:......
~ / ... ...... ...
... ...... ~ ...
...... ...
~......... ...
... ... ... ... ~ ...
... ............ ............ -/ ......... ~ ... <......... ... ....
......... ............... ..........
...... ....
(.. .
(~:.:.....:..
Revised 3~14-05
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: Presented
3. Community Invocation by Bud Henthorn, Youth Pastor at Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: Presented
4. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting: Approve
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a L-Q zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road: Approve
c. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road: Approve
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other Jots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden -
4625 West '.Ustick Road: Approve
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: V AR
05-004 : Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridjan Cjty Council Agenda - March 15~ 2005 Page 1 of 5
AU materiars presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City CJerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
("
cy.::. ."
Revised 3-14..05
450 feet to 535 feet for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy
Worden - 4625 West Ustick Road: Approve
F" Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04-
034 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from a RUT
zone to a R-8 zone for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo
Construction - 6000 North Meridian Road: Approve
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions .of Law for Approval: PP 04-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 98 building lots and
27 common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road: Approve
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-052 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a residential subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone
for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road: Approve
L Water Service Easement for McKaaue Familv Revocable Livina
Trust: Approve
J. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKaQue Familv
Revocable Livina Trust: Approve
7-K. Approve Liquor License for Backwater Saloon: Table to March
29,2005 - Contact Applicant
L. Request for Approval of proposal for Master Plan, Landscape
and Architectural Services for the 7-acre neighborhood park in
Autumn Faire Subdivision by Jensen-Belts Associates and the
Design Team: Approve
M.. Resolution No. 05-464 : Warranty Deed from Autumn
Faire. LLC to the City of Meridian: Approve
N. Resolution No. 05-465 Establishing Appointments
for Board Members and Alternates to the Vallev Ride Reaional
Transportation Authoritv: Approve
o. Aareement with HDR for GIS On Call Services: Approve
P. Chanae Order No.2 for an Addition Pressure ReducinQ Valve
with Star Construction: Approve
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 2 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
AnYOne desjring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888-4433 at Jeast 48 hours prior to the pubric meeting.
(
Revised 3-14-05
Q. Award Bid for Victory Road I Meridian Road Water Main to Paul
Construction: Approve
R" Streetliaht Aareement for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
Approve
s. Streetliaht Quitclaim Deed for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
Approve
T. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "A" in
proposed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
Approve
u. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "8" in
proposed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
Approve
6. Department Reports:
A. Police Department - Chief Bill Musser
1. Presentation of MOU with Ada County Sheriff
Department for Participation in SWAT Team: Approve
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
8. Request for Reduction in Fees for Pinebridge Subdivision by Dave
McKinnon: Approve
9. FP 05-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2.44
acres in a R-8 zone for Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8 by
Brighton Development, Inc~ - west of Locust Grove Road and north of
Ustick Road: Approve
1 o~ FP 05..016 Request for Final Plat approval of 50 single-family residential
building lots and 9 common lots on 23~ 71 acres in a R-4 zone for
BridQetower Crossina Subdivision No. 11 by Primeland Development,
LLP - west of North Linder Road and south of West McMillan Road:
Approve
11. FP 05-0 17 Request for Final Plat approval for 4 7 single-family residential
bu ild ing lots and 2 com man lots 0 n 17 . 53 acres in a R -8 zone fo r
Paramount Subdivision No.5 by Paramount Development, (nc~ - south
of Chinden Boulevard and west of North Meridian Road: Approve
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15t 2005 Page 3 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
AnYOne deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City CJerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(:',.. "
Revised 3-14-05
'~/though the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and
honest to best of the ability of the presenter. JJ
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 1, 2005: PFP 04~008 Request
for Preliminary/Final Plat approval for 4 building lots on 8~02 acres in an 1-
L zone for Nola Subdivision by Bergey Land Surveying - SWC of East
Pine Avenue and North Nola Road: Approve Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
13. Public Hearing: AZ 04..033 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of
15.92 acres from C-2 and RUT zones to C-G zone for Stor-It by Avest LP
- 355 North Ten Mile Road: Approve Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
14. Public Hearing: CUP 04-055 Request for a Conditional Use Permit I
Planned Development for office, retail and daycare uses in an I-L zone as
required by CUP 04-009 and a request for a building height modification
from the previously approved 40-feet to 52-feet for DBS) Realtv Corp. by
DBSI Realty Corp. - north of West Overland Road and east of South
Linder Road: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for
Approval
15~ Public Hearing: PP 05-001 Request for an amendment of the
Preliminary Plat for phases 7 & 1 0 of Saauaro Canyon Subdivision
consisting of 21 single family residential building lots on 6+/- acres in a R-
4 zone by Farwest - 6210 North Meridian Road: Approve Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval
16. Public Hearing: RZ 04~016 Request for a Rezone of ~27 acre from R-4
to Q-T zone for Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard - 1305
West 1st Street: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
for Approval
17. Public Hearing: PFP 04-009 Request for Preliminary Final Plat approval
of 4 single family attached residential building lots on .27 acre in a
proposed Q-T zone for. Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard
- 1305 West 1st Street: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for Approval
18~ Public Hearing: CUP 04-054 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development for retail uses in a C-N zone for The Shops at
Cherry Lane by High Point Equities, LLC - SWC of West Cherry Lane
and North Ten Mile Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law for Approval
Merjdian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 4 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shaH become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilitjes related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City CJerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(
/~..: .
\.,.......... ..
Revised 3-14-05
19.. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve
20. Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67 -2345 (1) (c) and (f): No
Decision
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 5 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
AnYOne deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerkfs Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(
('....
Revised 3-15-05
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15,2005 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
t Shaun Wardle )< Christine Donnell
)( Charlie Rountree )( Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: ~rvf~
3. Community Invocation by Bud Henthorn, Youth Pastor at Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: ;aY'L,r-eh~
4.
Adoption of the Agenda:
~ ~o V\t!::. #'
5. Consent Agenda: &Vf'r1P~
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting: 4';rro~
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a L-Q zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road: a//lr,vJ(..;
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5*01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
-4625 West Ustick Road: ~pp1l7~
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04..
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other lots on 4~56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden -
4625 West Ustick Road: 4/f/Y'14A<.--
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR
05-004 : Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15) 2005 Page 1 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
Please contact the City Clerkls Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
7 -- K.
{
(
)~ :
f.
-;~~.. .
Revised 3-15-05
F.
450 feet to 535 feet for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy
Worden - 4625 West Ustick Road: apP'"v<.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
034 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from a RUT
zone to a R-8 zone for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo
Construction - 6000 North Meridian Road: &fJj1W~
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 98 building lots and
27 common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road: ~rvfAC-.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: CUP
04-052 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a residential subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone
for Hacienda Subdivision by Jaya Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road: 1Vf7f1TD ~
Water Service Easement for McKaaue Familv Revocable Livina
Trust: tlpfln7v~
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKaaue Familv
Revocable livina Trust: t1F?Pr&JtA(.,
Approve Liquor license for Backwater Saloon:
-jit..6t2t ,t.Q 1n1Vl--e-'A, ~1, ~,,~ - c~~-( ~p;:U/~
Request for Approval of proposal for Master Plan. Landscaoe
and Architectural Services for the 7-acre neiahborhood park in
Autumn Faire Subdivision by Jensen-Belts Associates and the
Design Team: Plf~VL
Resolution No. 05~ fG 4- Warranty Deed from
Autumn Faire. llC to the City of Meridian: a/jl1i:'~
Resolution No. nc;... 4-6 5" Establishing
Appointments for Board Members and Alternates to the Vallev
Ride Reaional Transportation Authoritv: af/prr?~
Agreement with HDR for GIS On Call Services: arljJn7~
Chanae Order No.2 for an Addition Pressure Reducing Valve
with Star Construction: o/fN"PV-C--
G.
H.
I.
J.
l.
M.
N.
o.
P.
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 2 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
t
j" "
t:.....: .
Revised 3-15-05
Q. Award Bid for Victory Road I Meridian Road Water Main to Paul
Construction: wf'pnP ~
R. Streetliaht Aareement for Vienna Woods Subdivision: PfJflYD v<-
s. StreetliQht Quitclaim Deed for Vienna Woods Subdivision: al'fJYpi/~
T. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "A" in
proposed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties: ~plJ I/~
u. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "B" in
proposed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties: (;i,.pp-P V~
6. Department Reports
A. Police Department - Chief Bill Musser
1. Presentation of MOU with Ada County Sheriff
Department for Participation in SWAT Team: a-f>'rpv~
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
8. Request for Reduction in Fees for Pinebridge Subdivision by Dave
McKinnon: Wf flYl' ~
9. FP 05-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2~44
acres in a R-8 zone for Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8 by
Brighton Development, Inc. - west of Locust Grove Road and north of
Ustick Road: ar~~
1 O. FP 05-016 Request for Final Plat approval of 50 single-family residential
building lots and 9 common lots on 23.71 acres in a R-4 zone for
Bridaetower Crossina Subdivision No. 11 by Primeland Development,
LLP - west of North Linder Road and south of West McMillan Road: tflJ1prt?V..Il-
11. FP 05-017 Request for Final Plat approval for 4 7 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 17.53 acres in a R-8 zone for
Paramount Subdivision No.5 by Paramount DevelopmentJ Inc. - south
of Chinden Boulevard and west of North Meridian Road: ~ ;rrv ~
itA/though the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and
honest to best of the ability of the presenter~ I'
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 1, 2005: PFP 04-008 Request
for Preliminary/Final Plat approval for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an 1-
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15. 2005 Page 3 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
Please contact the City Clerk-s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(:
(.
Revised 3-15-05
L zone for Nola Subdivision by Bergey Land SurveyifJ9 - SWC of East
Pine Avenue and North Nola Road: e(fr~-f//'~I/ firYtfIj?f'T#?V~
13. Public Hearing: AZ 04-033 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of
15.92 acres from C-2 and RUT zones to C-G zone for Stor-It by Avest LP
- 355 North Ten Mile Road: ~pv< .,t:-/,c, cl-e j;,y-a;;;rr.?fr~
14. Public Hearing: CUP 04-055 Request for a Conditional Use Permit I
Planned Development for office, retail and daycare uses in an I-L zone as
required by CUP 04-009 and a request for a building height modification
from the previously approved 40-feet to 52-feet for DBSt Realty Corp. by
OSSI Realty Corp. - north of West Overland Road and east of South
Linder Road: ~~ ~/~fo(L Idr ~~
15. Public Hearing: PP OS-<J01 Request for an amendment of the
Preliminary Plat for phases 7 & 1 0 of Saauaro Canyon Subdivision
consisting of 21 single family residential building lots on 6+/- apres in a R- A 0
4 zone by Farwest-6210 North Meridian Road: ~/rv<../I~/c.-I.,e ~~/~pv~
16. Public Hearing: RZ 04-016 Request for a Rezone of .27 acre from R-4
to 0- T zone for Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard - 1305
West 1st Street: w~~ ,P/~f o/~ l1rv-~ttr~
17. Public Hearing: PFP 04-009 Request for Preliminary Final Plat approval
of 4 single family attached residential building lots on .27 acre in a
proposed O-T zone for Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard
-1305 West 1st Street: ~(ljlY1/t/1.(... .,tJ/-P/~/.f ~a,f1rf/L1L
18. Public Hearing: CUP 04-054 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development for retail uses in a C-N zone for The Shops at
Cherry lane by High Point Equities, LLC - SWC of West Cherry Lane
and North Ten Mile Road: lhe,~ :f(~ I cf.,( ~etpr~
19. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: ~rv-c-,
20. Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f):
i1 0 dee-idl ~
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15,2005 Page 4 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
Please contact the City Clerkls Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours Prior to the PUbliC meeti n9.
(~,....
April 11 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
April 5/ 2005
ITEM NO~
5-C
REQUEST Approve minutes of March 151 2005 Regular City Council Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials;
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
I.
\.
Meridian City Council Meeting
March 15~ 2005.
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:10P.M.]
Tuesday, March 15,2005, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd~
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle, Charlie
Rountree, and Christine Donnell.
Others Present: Bill Nary, Will Berg, Brad Watson, Anna Canning, Bill Musser, Kenny
Bowers, Doug Strong and Dean Willis.
Item 1:
Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X
X Christine Donnell
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: I will go ahead and -- if we can get everyonefs attention, I will go ahead and
call the City Council regular meeting to order and welcome you here. It is Tuesday,
March 15th. It's ten after 7:00. J will start this meeting with roll call attendance.
Item 2:
Pledge of Allegiance:
De Weerd: Item No~ 2 is the pledge of allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the
pledge.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Item 3:
Community Invocation by Bud Henthorn, Youth Pastor at Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
De Weerd: Item No. 3 is our Community Invocation. We will be led tonight by Bud
Henthorn and is he a young -- the youth pastor. He is young, too. He is the youth
pastor at Meridian Gospel Tabernacle. Please join us in the invocation or take this
opportunity for a moment of sifence.
This community. We thank you, Lord Jesus, for the sacrifice that has been made on
behalf of the people who live here. God, we pray now that you would give us wisdom
as we do our best to be good stewards of this blessed community that you have given
to US~ We ask it in Jesus' name, amen.
Item 4:
Adoption of the Agenda:
De Weerd: Thank you so much. Item No.4 is adoption of the agenda.
( .
I
\:
Meridjan City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 2 of 49
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: On the Consent, Item K, we would like to move that to the general agenda, make
it 7-K~ Illf get the resolution numbers when we do the Consent Agenda and I believe -- I
would move with that change that we adopt the revised agenda.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve the agenda as amended. All those in favor
say aye. All ayes~ Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5:
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting:
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: CUP
0.4-053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic / office in a L-Q zone for OBfGYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road:
c. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT to
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden -
4625 West Ustick Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other lots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden -
4625 West Ustick Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR
05-004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
450 feet to 535 feet for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy
Worden - 4625 West Ustick Road:
F.. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04~
034 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from a RUT
zone to a R-B zone for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo
Construction - 6000 North Meridian Road:
(".. .
/~..
l,.
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 3 of 49
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 98 building lots and
27 common lots on 1 9..63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: CUP
04~052 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a residential subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone
for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road:
I. Water Service Easement for McKaaue Familv Revocable Livina
Trust:
J. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKaaue Familv
Revocable livina Trust:
L. Request for Approval of proposal for Master Plan, Landscape
and Architectural Services for the 7-acre neiahborhood Dark in
Autumn Faire Subdivision by Jensen-Belts Associates and the
Design Team:
M. Resolution No. 05-464 : Warranty Deed from Autumn
Faire. lLC to the City of Meridian:
N. Resolution No. 05-465 Establishing ApDointments
for Board Members and Alternates to the Vallev Ride Regional
Trans~ortation Authoritv:
o. Aareement with HDR for GIS On Call Services:
PII Chanae Order No.2 for an Addition Pressure Reducina Valve
with Star Construction:
Q. Award Bid for Victory Road I Meridian Road Water Main to Paul
Construction:
R. Streetliaht Aareement for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
s. Streetliaht Quitclaim Deed for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
T. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "A" in DroDosed
Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
/:.: ..... .
{,. .
(. .
. .
Meridian City Council
March 151 2005
Page 4 of 49
u. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "8" in ~roposed
Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
De Weerd: Consent Agenda, No.5.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Bird: Mr. Berg, what is our -- do you have them there?
Donnell: Down it comes.
Bird: I would move that we approve the Consent Agendat with the exception of taking
Item K and moving it to 7-K on the regular agenda. M is Resolution No. 05-464. N is
Resolution No. 05-465, and the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper
papers.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to approve the Consent Agenda as changed. If there is no
further discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES~
Item 6:
Department Reports
A. Police Department - Chief Bill Musser
1. Presentation of MOU with Ada County Sheriff
Department for Participation in SWAT Team:
De Weerd: Okay. Item No.6 are Department Reports and there we have another
enemy item -- or member. We had team play today and Brad and the chief and Kenny
over there were the enemy. So, chief. Chief Wild Bill.
Musser: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, what I have for you this evening is a
proposed memorandum of understanding with the Ada County Sheriffs Department
regarding participation of the Meridian Police Department with their Special Weapons
And Tactics team, what we all affectionately know of as a SWAT team. At this point
what I have been doing is working with the department trying to find alternatives to help
us with retention when we are looking at some of our larger departments and some of
the specialty areas that they offer. The county has been good enough to go ahead and
let us move forward with training and testing of at least two of our members at this point
(. .
(~
t~:
Meridian City Council
March 15 J 2005
Page 5 of 49
and they have qualified for their SWAT team at this point, so they are undergoing
training and this allows us a little bit more specialization that we couldn't necessarily do
ourselves at this point, given our size and the cost of maintaining a full blown SWAT
team that would augment their team and also provide us some insiders for anything that
may potentially occur here in Meridian~ At this point, though, after ies been through
legal and all, our MOU does require signature of the Mayor at this point, which is why I
wanted to bring it forth tonight, find out if there are any questions on it, and, then, if not,
see jf we can move forward with the Mayorls signature on that, you know, followed by
my own, and, then, we can move forward with participation with the county on this
SWAT operation team and I stand for any questions if there are any.
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
Donnell: None.
De Weerd: Okay~ Thank you, chief.
Musser: Thank you.
De Weerd: I need a motion, then, to sign.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve the MOU with the Ada County SWAT team and for the Mayor
to sign and the police chief to sign, the clerk to attest both signatures.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to approve the presentation by the chief for the MOU. If there
is no further discussion, Mr. Berg?
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle. yea; Donnell, yea~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 7:
(Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
K. Approve Liquor License for Backwater Saloon:
De Weerd: Thank you. We removed Item K from the Consent Agenda~ Mr~ Nary,
would you like to open this discussion?
(. .
.\~ . . .
(':n...:
Meridian City Council
March 15f 2005
Page 6 of 49
Nary: Certainly, Madam Mayor, Members of the CounciL We were presented tonight
with a liquor license approval -- or request for approval for the Backwater Saloon. You
had an item like this previously a few weeks ago in front of you regarding this type of
facilitYa All of our -- in reviewing our city code, the schedule of use control requires that
all bars require -- are required to have a Conditional Use Permit. This particular one is,
essentially, an accessory bar inside another already licensed establishment at the
Whitewater Saloon. It does not currently have a Conditional Use Permit So, if the
Council has not had to address this previously, except for the one occasion, J think we
had with Mugsy.s a few weeks ago --.1 spoke with Mrs~ Canning this afternoon about our
code and other types of conditional uses the city hasn't previously required a second
CU to be acquired, but they never had to address that in regards to a bar or a liquor
establishment. Because of that it would be my opinion if the Council wants to make a
finding in regard to thatt they probably need to make a finding on whether a second
Conditional Use Permit is required~ If ies going to be required, you may want to
consider setting this matter over for one week to inform the applicant of that~ The last
applicant whose application was denied, Mr. Eddy, objected to the fact that he didn't
receive any opportunity to come and speak to you regarding his application. Again, I
think it's more of a legal issue if you want to make that finding, but you certainly may
want to allow the applicant an opportunity to speak if you want to. Mrs. Canning could
probably provide more on the planning side, but I think there is that issue, as well as I
think the police chief and I have had a couple of discussions and there are some
concerns of public safety reasons on having two licensed establishments in the same
premise. I think you will also have the ability, under our ordinance, to make that finding
as well on where to approve or deny a license. Additionally, if the Council would like,
under our city code and the section on licensing, we could certainly clarify, if you would
like me to bring an ordinance back, if thafs your preference on whether or not two liquor
-- two licensed liquor establishments could be in the same premise and what
requirements there may need to be to have them be separate, so that they can be dwelt
with from a law enforcement standpoint. I could certainly bring a draft ordinance back to
you in a couple of weeks if you would like that. Thirdly, if there is a question about the
state code, I think it came up in a meeting that I wasn't present, Mr~ Baird was here
instead, the question was what the state code speaks to in regards to that and the state
code is, essentially, silent, it really leaves it to the city to make those determinations as
to zoning and whatever other requirements you cite, just the ability to actually have a
license for the establishments themselves, the city does have the ability to do that and I
think that was a question that had come up previously. So, that was what I had from the
legal side and Chief Musser or Mrs~ Canning can add any other information you may
want.
De Weerd: Chief or Anna, do you have anything to add?
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the only thing I might add is that the
only other instance where we -- where a CU doesn't run with the land is day care~ Itts a
licensing issue in that case, too. So, they are similar in that they both have a separate
license issued by the state~
( .
(~~,..
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 7 of 49
De Weerd: Council, any questions or comments?
Donnell: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs~ Donnell.
Donnell: Okay~ So, help me to refresh my memory about the last time that this was
brought before us. Am I to understand that this is exactly like the request that we had
from Eddy's that wanted to acquire a license at MUgSY'Sf but am I also correct that we
did allow it with Bill & Lynns' Back Door, but if I remember correctly, we denied that
license -- the additional for Eddy's. How -- is this any different than what we looked at
before?
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council-member Donnell, other than
maybe some -- there may be some differences in layout, it is, essentially, the same
circumstance that you viewed before in regards to Mugsy.s and Eddy's required for that
separate licensed facility within their restaurant. You did deny that request~ He has
filed -- he did file a letter, which requested an appeal. There is no appeal under the city
code for that type of denial. He has filed a second application, which is, really, his
remedy. Thafs -- you can always come back and ask for another license, jf the
circumstances change. That might be in front of you in the next meeting. I don1t know
when it's scheduled to be in front of you for review. The other one, the Bill & Lynn's,
what I think the -- the information received prior at the last meeting was -- I think there
was an oversight on that. I think the issue of whether it's a conditional use -- I haven1t
discussed it with Mrs. Canning -- if a conditional use is required, if that's the direction of
this Council as to how you interpret your city code, then, there is still the opportunity to
notify them that thafs still required. A license is one thing, zoning requirements and the
application for zoning is different. So, there is certainly something we can Jook at
whether that's appropriate at this juncture with the other facilities~ But other than -- to
answer your question, I guess, is -- the long way around, to answer your question is,
yes, ifs very similar to the last one that you have done.
Donnell: Madam Mayor, follow up, please.
De Weerd: Yes.
Donnell: Did we also not talk about a change in the ordinance coming before the
Council when we discussed this the last time or did we not? And if we didn't, then, I
certainly would suggest that we should have some change in the ordinance, so that we
will have a clarification in interpretation that we can go on to either deny or approve this
request
De Weerd: Mrs. Donnell, I think that there wasJ but there wasn1t this specific instruction
and that is why staff has gotten together to talk about it, to look at -- at the code and do
an evaluation and bring something back and this is the recommendation they are
bringing back to you, so that our codes can be more specific in addressing the issue.
(r.... ..
I.
t...
, Meridjan City Council
March 15,2005
Page 8 of 49
Donnell: Thank you.
Canning: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Canning: I do need to clarify one thing, since it is -- he has asked to come before you
agajn~ On Mike & Eddy's, it was a different scenario, because Mugsy's is not approved
for a bar. Mugsy's is a restaurant. So, to move a bar on that property definitely requires
conditional use approval and that's why the Council was -- one of the reasons that the
Council denied it -- the request for the liquor licenses. They definitely, by the land use
code, required a conditional use approval, because they do not have one currently.
Nary: Madam Mayor, yes -- and I guess 11m sorry that I misspoke in the sense that the
circumstances of how the facility is operated is the same. Mrs. Canning is absolutely
right, that one clearly needs a Conditional Use Permit. There isn't, really, an
interpretation issue in my mind~ This one is an interpretation of our code, because how
we have applied it in relation to other types of conditional uses that aren't licensed
establishments versus this one. In our city code it only lists bars as conditional uses in
all the zones that they are allowed to be in and so the way I read it and my interpretation
is is that whether it's one bar or two bars, it doesn1t really make any difference, they all
require conditional use, regardless of whether they are in one building or two buildings.
Donnell: Okay.
Canning: And a follow up, Madam Mayor, I did talk to the planning commission on the
specific use standards for drinking establishments in the new code and we did come up
with two things -- well, we came up with one thing and I think I forgot to add the second
one, but the second one would be we will just put in there that only one liquor license is
allowed per establishment, without an additional conditional use approval. We will just
put that in. The other one was our definition of drinking establishment specifically
excludes restaurants where the principal purpose of the structure is to serve food. We
are going to tighten that down a bit and we are going to say excluding restaurants that
do not serve alcohol after 11 :00 p.m~ So, that way the bars will really be bars and -- I
mean if you -- if you have got Mugsyts that's serving -- that's serving alcohol after 11 :00
p.m~ and some bar food, it's clear they are not a restaurant, even though they are
serving some food there~ So, I think that will make it a much easier and more
enforceable definition for the enforcement folks.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
C... .
c:...:. .:. .
Meridian City Council
March 1St 2005
Page 9 of 49
Bird: Why would you make bars and restaurants different on times? There is a Jot of
bars that stay -- or restaurants stay open until midnight, 1 :00 olclock, and if they have
got a liquor license, they are entitled to serve their liquor.
Canning: The general consensus from the Planning and Zoning Commission was that if
you1re serving liquor past 11 :00 p~m., you probably should have a Conditional Use
Permit for a bar, because, otherwisef we will have everyone just calling them-selves a
restaurant and I don1t think we want to make everyone get a Conditional Use Permit for
a restaurant.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: A restaurant has got to have something -- a kitchen that you can serve out of.
You donlt bring in catered food and consider yourself a restaurant So, if you have got a
kitchen in there and ies usable and you serve food, then, youlre a restaurant and you
can also be a restaurant bar, I guess.
Canning: Wellf most bars have some sort of kitchen facilities with -- that serve food~
Bird: Most bars do?
Canning: Uh-huh.
Donnell: So, Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs~ DonnelL
Donnell: So, 11m having a hard time understanding why an establishment -- a drinking
establishment, a bar. wants two licenses in the same facility. Is that just too simple a
question?
Bird: No.
Rountree: It's a good question.
Bird: It's a very good question.
Donnell: Okay~ Here we go.
De Weerd: We need to have our economic development coordinator answer that.
Donnell: I think that came out at the last one, but I -- obviously. it didn't stay with me. so
here we go again.
(/
t,::.. ..
("
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 10 of 49
Musser: Madam Mayor and Members of the Councif -- and perhaps this might help
clear up things a little bit, Councilwoman DonnelL First off, when the state issues an
alcohol license out, in particular a liquor license, you can obtain a liquor license for two
establishments, bar or a restaurant. There is also a retail one, but we won't go down
that road right now on it. For those two items, though, if it's inside of a restaurant, the
restaurant has to show that more than 50 percent of their overall gross profits are
associated with the service of food or delivery of food, as opposed to alcohol. A bar
only shows the majority that they bring in is from the sale of the liquor or other alcoholic
beverages. So, that's part of the distinction there, as to whether or not they are a
restaurant or a bar pursuant in the state guides on that. In reference to your specific
question on why we have two of them in thereJ at this point what ifs come down to is,
essentially, the liquor licenses are an investment for most of the business people that
have been in line waiting for it~ We have had a number of them that have opened up,
because of our increase in population. However, the state has a gO-day requirement for
them to put that license into operation once it's issued to them. What they have been
doing is trying to find some sort of mechanism to be able to do that and what they are
doing is renting out, essentially, closet space, a section of the -- of an existing bar in
order to be able to say that they are in operation and they are running with that. And we
have been down to check the one that did get approved inadvertently before all this
came before us and it's, essentially, in a small room off of the kitchen and they are
operating out of a file cabinet, they serve three drinks, all drinks cost you a minimum of
ten dollars, and you have to request somebody serve it to you in there at the time. So,
all it is, basically, is a mechanism so the license can be put in place to meet the state
requirement of the 90 days. In essence, what we are facing is a legislative oversight at
the state level, which we are having to handle at the municipal level at this point
Donnell: Thank you.
De Weerd: And I guess I would just add a little bit further to that confusion, is we found
this and we found them in drawers in Cascade and false addresses in Boise and so --
because we are looking for economic development, we have restaurants legitimately
wanting to come in and buy these permits for 800 dollars and they are being sold in
Boise for 100,000. So, what this city has done with our Economic Development
Coordinator, our City Attorney, and a Boise Attorney is written some legislation that
addresses two different things. One is a legitimate time frame for a legitimate permit
holder or license holder to put it into use. SOl extending the 90 days, so that they show
good faith effort in trying to find a location and building or annexing, zoning, those kind
of things -- a lot of the different things that they are faced with, versus the person who is
holding it and trying to sell it two years down the road. SOf that legislation has been
writtenf it's with Senator Bunderson, who will most likely sponsor it next year. So, more
information than you probably asked for.
Donnell: Now I know~
c.
('.
Meridian Ci ty Council
March 15, 2005
Page 11 of 49
De Weerd: But it has been an issue in our city. SOf Council, do you feel comfortable
with this ordinance update, bringing back in two weeks -- on the 29th, since that is our
next meetingf and addressing it again at that time?
Donnell: Uh-huh.
Bird: You want to -- do you want to continue this until March 29th?
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Bird: I agree. They got a right to have a day in court
De Weerd: Okay. Then, I will need a motion to continue this.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we continue Item 7-K until March 29th, 2005.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to continue to the 29th. All those in favor say aye. All
ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Item No~ 8 --
Rountree: Do we need a motion on the ordinance?
Bird: Yeah, you do.
De Weerd: Do I need a motion on the ordinance?
Nary: Madam Mayort if the Council has -- if they would like to review an ordinance, that
would make it -- prohibit two licensed establishments on the same .premise, and the
Council is all in agreement with that or has no objection to that, I will bring you a draft
ordinance in two weeks.
De Weerd: Okay.
Rountree: I agree.
Item 8:
Request for Reduction in Fees for Pinebridge Subdivision by Dave
McKinnon:
(
(o"..
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 12 of 49
De Weerd: Okay~ It looks like everyonels in agreement. Okay~ Yep. Item No~ 8 is a
request for reduction in fees for Pinebridge Subdivision. Dave McKinnon. Please state
your name and address.
McKinnon: Dave McKinnonJ 735 South Crosstimber.
De Weerd: Thank you.
McKinnon: Thank you. Good eveningr Mayor, Members of the CounciL You have all
received a memo from me~ Hopefully you have had a chance to read it. I don't want to
take up a whole lot of your time tonight. The fee structure for planned developments in
Meridian works great for smaller developments. Pinebridge Subdivision is a large
development, 120 acres, and ies going to have approximately a million square feet of
commercial office, retail, industrial buildings. The fee structure asks for two cents a
square foot and if you add that uPr it comes to about 20,000 dollars for an application
just for conceptual approval. After conceptual approval there is a requirement for a
detailed Conditional Use Permit approvalr which is five cents per square foot, which
would be another 501000 dollars. We felt that 70,000 dollars for an approval of a project
that would benefit the city seemed like a lot~ We talked with Anna. Anna agreed with
that. She suggested we come and talk to the Council. We met yesterday with Anna
and Bill Nary and Michelle Brown and come up with a number of 10,246 dollars. It
seemed like an appropriate number and we all came in agreement with that and we are
asking you at this time if we can make a check out to the city for that amount, so we can
move forward with our planned development~
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Mr~ McKinnon, I have to ask the question. How did you come up with the
10,247 was it?
McKinnon: Forty-six.
Wardle: Forty-six.
McKinnon Madam Mayorr Councilman Wardle, we came up with that number by taking
the two cents and halving it to one cent a square foot for 10rDOO square feet. The
conceptual PO also requires one dollar per apartment unit and we have 246 apartment
units, we said 246 apartment unitsr we will pay a dollar for each one of those, 10,000
dollars for the rest of the project, and we felt that that was appropriate. In the past you
have allowed reductions like this for larger projects, such as Silverstone and those
areas, and you reduced it a similar amount.
(.... ::
(<:;....:.. .
Meridian Cjty Council
March 1St 2005
Page 13 of 49
Wardle: Thanks. Had to ask~
McKinnon: Thank you~
De Weerd: Thank you~ We appreciate the question. Council, any other questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay~
McKinnon: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, I will also need a motion on this~
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle4
Wardle: I would move that we approve Item No~ 8, request for reduction in fees for
Pinebridge Subdivision, pursuant to applicant's comments.
Donnell: Second~
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve the request. Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes. Discussion.
Rountree: Though J will vote in the affirmative on that motion, 11m somewhat concerned
to a bit of an arbitrary approach to this. I would suggest that we have staff review this
issue and come back with either an ordinance amendment or some guidance that takes
care of this in the future.
De Weerd: An excellent suggestion. which we would have gotten to after the vote, if
you hadn't of done that now, so -- and we do, we need to put that in perspective. J think
this application has been somewhat delayed for a good period of time because of this
and so we do need to clarify it~ Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Canning: Madam Mayor?
(
(....:....
Meridian City Council
March 15 f 2005
Page 14 of 49
De Weerd: Thank you~ Anna.
Canning: The last time this issue came up I got similar instructions and I did go back
and I looked at the fee structure and what we discovered is ifs just these large projects
that really throw it out of whack. Part of the problem is that we require the conceptual
and, then, the detailed CU. So, we will completely revamp the fee ordinance and bring
it to you, along with the new zoning ordinance that will be necessary, because, like for
conditional usesJ for instance, they are no longer coming all the way up to you, so we
need to amend the fee appropriately to reflect that the P&Z will be making the decision.
So, there will be a wide restructuring of the fee structure and there is no more
conceptual versus detailed CU. So, I think we will have a better tool for coming up with
appropriate fees for you~ And I would also like to state for the record that some -- that
the delay in processing with regard to the fee was not as much as other reasons
regarding the conceptual site plan, so --
De Weerd: Which have all been worked out?
Canning: Yes~ And they are ready to go.
Item 9:
FP 05-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2~44
acres in a R-8 zone for Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8 by
Brighton Development, Inc~ - west of Locust Grove Road and north of
Ustick Road:
De Weerd: Thank you~ Okay. We already called roll and moved on this one, so let's
move forward. Item 9 is FP 05-015. I will start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for two building lots
on 2.44 acres. They are currently zoned R-8, but they were approved as a use
exception for a planned development and we have asked that the applicant submit a
rezone application for C-N, so we can get the proper zoning on the property and they --
that is currently in process~ The final plat is in substantial conformance with the
approved preliminary plat and staff is recommending approvaL And there is a letter
from ML Turnbull saying they are in agreement with the conditions of approval.
De Weerd: Okay. Council? Okay~ I would entertain a motion~
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I move we approve Item No~ 9, FP 05-015, subject to staff comments.
Bird: Second.
(::.. ..
(.~~.
~. .
Meridian City Coun ci I
March 15t 2005
Page 15 of 49
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 9. If there is no further discussion,
Mr. BergJ will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 10:
FP 05-016 Request for Final Plat approval of 50 single-family residential
building lots and 9 common Jots on 23. 71 acr~s in a R-4 zone for
Bridaetower Crossina Subdivision No. 11 by Primeland DevelopmentJ
LLP - west of North Linder Road and south of West McMillan Road:
De Weerd: Item 1 0 is FP 05-016. Start with Anna.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a request for 47 single family
residential building Jots, three commercial office lots, and nine common lots on 23~ 71
acres in Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision. Thafs the preliminary plat that's before you
right now and as you will see, the final plat is in substantial conformance with the
approved preliminary plat. Staff is recommending approval.
De Weerd: Okay. Is the applicant in agreement with all staff comments?
Canning: Oh, I'm sorry. I do have a Jetter from the applicant stating they are in
agreement with the conditions of approval. They did note some concern about the
drainage areas with problems they have been having out there, but they will work with
staff to address those issues.
De Weerd: Okay~ Well, with the letter from --
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree~
Rountree: I move that we approve Item No.1 0, FP 05-016, subject to staff comments
and working out the drainage issues.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 1 O. Mr~ Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 11:
FP 05-017 Request for Final Plat approval for 47 single-family residential
building Jots and 2 common lots on 17.53 acres in a R-8 zone for
c.:.
(:~:.'.....
Meridian City Co unci!
March 15 J 2005
Page 16 of 49
Paramount Subdivision No.5 by Paramount Development, Inc~ - south
of Chinden Boulevard and west of North Meridian Road:
De Weerd: Thank you~ Item 11 is FP 05-017.
Canning: Madam Mayor, sorry about that~ Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this
is the -- this one has 47 single-family residential lots, too~ That must be a magic number
today. This is the fifth final plat for Paramount Subdjvision~ It includes 47 single family
residential building lotsf two common lots, on 17 ~53 acres of land and the preliminary
plat is shown before you now~ This is toward the north end of the site just before you
get to Chinden Boulevard. And as you can tell, the preliminary plat -- final plat is in
substantial compliance with the approved preliminary pJat~ Staff is recommending
approval. I do have a letter from the applicant stating that they are in agreement with
the conditions of approval~ We have been discussing the configuration of two lots in the
northwest corner and the design of the flag and driveway associated with those lots, so
staff is still working on that, but any answer that they -- or any solution that we come up
with will be, essentially, the same as what's before you nOW4
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Anna. Council, any questions?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve Item No. 11 J FP 05-017, Paramount Subdivision No.5.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. We have a motion to approve Item 11 and a second. If there is no
discussion, Mr. Berg?
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 12:
Continued Public Hearing from March 1, 2005: PFP 04-008 Request
for Preliminary/Final Plat approval for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an 1-
L zone for Nola Subdivision by Bergey land Surveying - SWC of East
Pine Avenue and North Nola Road:
De Weerd: Okay~ Item 12 is a continued Public Hearing from March 1 st, on PFP 04-
008. I will open this Public Hearing with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is a combined request for a
preliminary and final plat approve for four building lots on eight acres in an I-L zone.
The property is located. on the southwest corner of Pine Street and Nola. The
;:.. ..
\.:..... :
(. .
Merjdian Cjty Council
March 1St 2005
Page 17 of 49
preliminary plat would create four lots, the large one that is currently occupied by Oak
Harbor Freight, and, then, three smaller Jots that front onto Pine Street. 11m just going to
briefly hit on some of the issues that were discussed during the -- well -- okay. The
Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of this application to you~
They held a hearing on March -- no. They held a hearing on February 3rd. The
applicanfs representative Angie Cornish testified in favor of the application and the
Planning and Zoning Commission took testimony -- Josh was presenting the
application. The big discussion items, which is what I was trying to get at, were two.
One was a multi-use pathway and currently the multi-use pathway is generally shown
coming up to Pine and, then, it -- there is one that angles off onto this property here,
which was the one that you just granted the reduction in fees on, so we will see the
continuation of this multi-use pathway down to Pine. It doesn't follow a natural feature.
The issue is -- currently shown as coming up Nola, but once Locust Grove is fully
improved, they will close off the NoJa grade crossing of the railroad tracks. There will be
a cul-de-sac here and a cul-de-sac here~ So, they don't want people walking across it
when they are not letting people drive across it either. They don't want a separate
pedestrian access there. So, there is a need to shift this pathway~ It comes up through
the new -- kind of around the new ACHD facility~ There is a need to shift it onto Locust
Grove~ So, the question was where is the appropriate -- how do we get those multi-use
pathways~ That was the major discussion item at that time and, then, the future ACHD
requirements regarding Pine and Locust Grove~ This is kind of a key intersection at this
point~ The Commission did recommend adding a site-specific condition number six that
basically said give us a blanket easement on this Locust Grove site and somewhere
where we can put a ten-foot multi-use pathway. In reviewing this application today with
the Public Works director and the city attorney, we felt it was not appropriate for the
Council to add that condjtion~ John Priester, the county surveyor, does not want to see
-- or basically will not allow unspecified easement locations. You canlt have a blanket
easement, you have to pinpoint it on the plat~ So, that condition that the Commission
added would not be acceptable for recording purposes. We looked up the construction
plans for Locust Grove and they do provide a seven-foot wide sidewalk within the right
of way along Locust Grove. Similarly, there will be a seven-foot sidewalk on Pine Street
within the right of way. Well, I donlt know jf that one is in the right of way~ 11m assuming
it is. It is~ I'm getting a nod -- an affirmative nod from the applicant. So, we think that
although seven-foot sidewalks are not a preference for a multi-use pathway, in this case
where ACHD is constructing it already and ifs in the works, we feel it would be
acceptable for this project at this time. I believe that's the -- really, the only outstanding
issue for the Council at this point and so I will end statrs presentation.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, do you have questions for staff at this time?
Bird: I have none.
Rountree: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. Would the applicant like to make comment? If you will, please, state
your name and address.
(~
(~~,u... ,.....
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 18 of 49
Cornish: 11m Angela Cornish and I live at 600 Eastman Street in Boise, and I just
wanted to add in a little bit of detaiJ~ Anna is filling in, because Joshua is the one that
has been following this project all along and Joshls wife just had a baby and so Josh is
the one that's able to present it, but, unfortunately, the day before his wife had a baby
he and I went into a long conversation about this whole easement idea and about what
could we do with this idea of a meandering easement that we wouldn't have defined and
we talked with ACHD and talked together and I agreed that that seven foot sidewalk that
ACHD has planned, ies within their right of way and I believe there is at least two to
three feet of right of way also behind that sidewalk~ So, if at some point the city wanted
to talk with ACHD, there would be some sufficient space to actually pull that sidewalk
away from the curbf if you wanted to do that, or widen it to ten feet or meander it slightly
within that~ And so he and I had agreed the same thing, that, basically, it really didn't
make sense to put a nebulous, kind of arbitrary easement on that, that we agreed that
there was at least seven feet and, if not, ten feet, possibly, to fit a sidewalk in that
space. And so Anna wasn't party to that, because Josh had taken off and probably
hadn't conveyed that information to her and I apologize, I didn1t realize you didn't know
that, so I just wanted to note that there wasn't anything that was still out there, he had
kind of resolved that and, then, the next day he was gone, so that's that. If you have
any questions or anything~
De Weerd: Okay. Council, do you have any questions?
Rountree: No.
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Cornish: Thanks.
De Weerd: Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Seeing none, Council, if you have no further comments or questions, I
would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing.
Rountree: So moved.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 12. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
(:~.U.' .
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 19 of 49
Wardle: Madam Mayor. Annaf we have got a set of draft findings for this as well?
De Weerd: Oh, yes, sir, you do.
Wardle: Which portion of that would need to be amended to remove the blanket
easement?
Canning: The site specific condition number six. And I think thafs one where you could
probably just go ahead and recommend deleting it and we can get them over to be
signed.
Wardle: Okay. Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we approve Item No 12, PFP 04-008, for Nola Subdivision and to
approve the Findings with the deletion of site-specific condition number six.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion for Item 12 is to approve with the amendment as stated. Is
there any further discussion? Hearing none, ML Berg.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 13:
Public Hearing: AZ 04~033 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of
15.92 acres from C-2 and RUT zones to C-G zone for Star-It by Avest LP
- 355 North Ten Mile Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 13 is a Public Hearing on AZ 04-033. I'll open this Public
Hearing with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor. Members of the Council, this is a request solely for
annexation of 15.92 acres and they are requesting C-G zoning. The site is currently
developed as a storage area for Star-It and you will see that the front half of the site is
developed, but the rear half is not. They do receive City of Meridian water and as a
condition of obtaining that water they were required to annex when they were
contiguous, so they are now contiguous and available for annexing. They have
submitted a conceptual site plan for their further development of the property, as shown
here, and this site plan is only provided for your purposes~ They have not asked for this
detailed conditional use approval at this time. Staff is recommending a development
agreement associated with this and the -- we would suggest that the following items be
included in that development agreement: Ten Mile Road, which is on the east side of
the property, is within ACHDfs five year work plan and the right of way will be required to
(; ..
i-<.. : ~ .
to.!
\,.
Meridian City Cou ncil
March 15. 2005
Page 20 of 49
complete the plans that ACHD is preparing~ Staff is recommending that the applicant
dedicate the right of way as set forth by ACHD as a condition of the development
agreement And, then, prior to issuance of any building permit or certificate of zoning
compliance on the subject staff is recommending that it be reviewed for landscaping,
parking, setback requirements back here~ We are also recommending that prior to
issuance of any building permits or certificates of zoning compliance that the required
right of way shall be dedicated to ACHD~ And, then, finally. the Comprehensive Plan
designates a multi-use pathway along the Ten Mile Drain -- or Ten Mife Creek and so
we are recommending that the development agreement require the applicant to
construct a ten foot multi-use pathway to the parks department standards~ Prior to the
Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, the applicant did raise concern with the last
item that I just spoke to, so that was the primary item of discussion -- or one of them at
the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. They did conduct that hearing on
February 17th and the multi-use pathway was discussed, particularly should we -- I
think the developer -- or the applicant was in favor of just giving the easement and not
developing it at this time. We explained that the standard process for the city is to build
those short segments of pathway, so that we can connect themf eventually, and we
were -- staff was not in favor of not having it developed and the Planning Commission __
and that's what was in the staff report and the Planning Commission agreed~ So, they
did require construction of the pathway. With that, I will end staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Okay~ Thank you, Anna. Annat do we not have any special landscape
issues with these gateway corridors? With this being at the Ten Mile, with a future
interchange theref I guess -- I thought we had specific landscape requirements for entry
corridors.
Canning: We do~ The entryway corridor ends at Franklin. I didn't get you many
bearings. I'm sorry. This is FrankJin~ This is Ten Mile~ Here is the railroad track. It
does end at Franklin Road currently~ The landscaping -- and the applicant can explain
this a little bit better, but I do believe that he and Joe discussed the deficiencies in the
current landscaping, as compared to our code, because Ada County doesnrt require
nearly as much landscaping. I think the conditions of approval as worded were __
specifically mentioned landscaping as one of those, because I think that was a concern.
They are built fairly close to the right of way and when ACHD takes additional right of
way there will not be much property left there to landscape along there~ But 11m sure
that the applicant can address that in more specifics.
De Weerd: Thank you~ Thank you. Any questions, Council?
Bird: J have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Okay~ Would the applicant like to come forward~ If you will, please, state
your name and address~
Callaham: Craig Callaham, 6170 Shandee, Meridian.
(~.
t~....... . . .
(:. ..
'\.~:..... : . ..
Meridian Cjty Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 21 of 49
De Weerd: Thank you.
Callaham: The owner is in agreement with what was -- the conditions that were placed
at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and they had a few concerns with the
path still, mainly in that the concern about indemnity of the public walking down through
the middle of their property and falling into the creek and going out onto the railroad
track and things like that, but those are all things that can be addressed in the
development agreement, I believe. And as for the landscaping, it is developed under
the Ada County rules and so they understand that it has to be upgraded to meet the
current rules of the City of Meridian.
De Weerd: So, they understand that, but there is different setbacks and -- thinking of
buildings there. So, what do you mean by they understand that? What are their plans?
Callaham: There is an existing sidewalk along Ten Mile and) then, there is probably in
some parts 15 and some parts 20 feet of landscape area before you get into an
ornamental iron fence there that can be landscaped.
De Weerd: Okay.
Callaham: As well as along the sides of the railroad track and along the future pathway.
De Weerd: Thank you. I just had one other observation, you know, we don't always
have this opportunity, so -- but there is an entry corridor and you have your uncovered
storage on the southeast corner. Is there a way that that can be landscaped to kind of
shield what's being parked there?
Callaham: If we could go back to the conceptual plan, one of the ideas is that we get
some buildings -- you can seek along that front part trying to get a building in there to
help shield it.
De Weerd: Oh~ Okay.
Callaham: Any storage units, the buildings kind of become your fence, your screening
fence, they kind of block the view, then, you don1t see the cars that are parked outside
or anything like thatf so --
De Weerd: Thank you~ I appreciate that. Councilf any questions?
Bird: J have none, MayoL
Rountree: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you very much.
Callaham: Thank you.
c. ..
/....::...
(,:.. .
Meridian City Council
March 1St 2005
Page 22 of 49
De Weerd: Is there anyone in the audience who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Okay~ Council, there are no other questions or information needed?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: ML Wardle~
Wardle: Hearing no more requests, I move that we close the Public Hearing on Item 13.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 13~ All those in favor say
aye. All ayes. Motion carries~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Discussion or motion?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we approve Item No. 13, AZ 04-033, annexation and zoning for
Star-It and to also approve the findings pursuant to staff and applicant comments.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to approve Item 13. If there is no further discussion, Mr.
Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 14:
Public Hearing: CUP 04-055 Request for a Conditional Use Permit I
Planned Development for office, retail and daycare uses in an I-L zone as
required by CUP 04-009 and a request for a building height modification
from the previously approved 40-feet to 52-feet for DBSI Realtv CorD. by
DBSI Realty Corp. - north of West Overland Road and east of South
Linder Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 14 is a Public Hearing on CUP 04-055. I will open this
Public Hearing with staff comments.
(.: .. :.
(
Meridian City Council
March 1St 2005
Page 23 of 49
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this site is located on Overland Road
west of Meridian Road and this is Stoddard coming down south here. It doesn't go
north on Overland Road. The request is for, essentially, a modification of the previously
approved planned development and the request is to allow office, retail, and daycare
uses and I-L zone and for a building height modification from a 40 foot limit to 52 feet.
As I mentioned before, this is the previously approved planned development. You will
see, though, that only one building right there, which is Western Electronics, has
currently been constructed. The other ones are all shown as future buildings. This site
has been modified to have kind of two twin towers, so to speak, of 52 height -- 52 feet in
height. Here is an elevation of those buildings. The previous planned development
specifically required conditional use approval of office, retail, and daycare uses and so
thatfs why that's included within this application as well. The two buildings will be about
60,000 square feet each. We did review the parking and landscaping requirements and
have worked with the applicant on those items. Did want to point out that they have
added an additional driveway cut from the original application. ACHD has -- had
recommended not allowing that one~ They did appeal that request and I believe they
can give you an update tonight. My understanding is that ACHD did not grant their
appeal on that issue. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item on
February 3rd~ They have recommended approval with the conditions of approval that
have been attached in the findings~ The key issues of discussion were the height
measurement of the building and whether it was 52 feet to the very top of the building
and it is and the access points as required by ACHD and, then, the landscape plan
requiring future approvaL So, as I have said, Staff has worked with the applicant on the
necessary changes to the landscape plan~ To our knowledge there are no outstanding
issues before the City Council and with that I will end staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Thank you, Anna. Any questions for staff at this point?
Bird: I have none.
Rountree: None.
De Weerd: Okay~ Is the applicant here?
Yancey: Yes. My name is Wayne Yancey. 11m at 2621 Autumn Way, Meridian, Idaho.
And we are in concurrence with the findings and recommendations of staff~
De Weerd: Thank you. Any questions for the applicant?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Thank you very much.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Rountree.
(
r..
~~~:..:..'~ ....
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 24 of 49
Rountree: Whafs going on with the -- it appears to be kind of a boulevard type of
access in the middle, but what's happening on the outbound side? It seems to lose its
translation in your graphic there.
Yancey: On which?
Rountree: That would be the middle access -- yeah. On the west side there.
Yancey: This is an existing, divided private drive. ACHD denied our request for an
additional -- or for two additional drive curb accesses, so it would be our intent -- and
they had no preference to which one~ It would be our intent to construct the western
most drive and they -- their recommendation was to allow for a 36 foot width on that
curb cut. But this -- this drive is existing up to about this location right now and so these
two buildings would be served by this drive and the drive on the west The intent would
be for the -- the divided drive to continue through the property to the north,
approximately to the freeway that's located right here.
Rountree: Thank you.
Yancey: Okay.
De Weerd: Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this
application? Hearing none, any further information needed from staff and the applicant?
Bird: I don't, Mayor.
De Weerd: Okay.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Hearing nothing else, I move that we close the Public Hearing on Item 14.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to close Item 14~ All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion
carries~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle4
( .
c=.'....
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 25 of 49
Wardle: Anna, just a quick clarification. The applicant had mentioned that ACHD
upheld their denial of the curb cut. You mentioned that the Planning and Zoning
Commission was also recommending that, and so to approve the findings we wouldn't
need to change anything?
Canning: Correct.
Wardle: Okay. With that, Madam Mayor, J would move that we approve Item No. 14,
CUP 04-055, Conditional Use Permit for DBSI Realty Corp. and to also approve the
findings pursuant to staff and applicant comments.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 14. If there is no further discussion or
comment, Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 15:
Public Hearing: PP 05-001 Request for an amendment of the
Preliminary Plat for phases 7 & 10 of Saauaro Canyon Subdivision
consisting of 21 single family residential building lots on 6+/- acres in a R-
4 zone by Farwest - 6210 North Meridian Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 15 is a Public Hearing on PP 05-011. I will open this
Public Hearing with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is an amendment to the previous
approval for Saguaro Canyon Subdivision. The entire site for Saguaro is shown here
and, then, this is the portion -- this is the approved preliminary plat and this is the
portion that's being reconfigured. Note the five-acre Boyack property. As you may
recall, they did request that this be left as a single five-acre property. It does have a flag
frontage extending out to Meridian Road andf then, you can see the angle on it and the
angled street, whereas everything else is pretty much north-south in this area. The
owners of -- the Boyacks have decided to go ahead and develop at this time, so the
primary purpose of this amendment is to develop that property and here is the five acre
piece right there. You can see that the amendments -- the previously angled streets,
they have asked to amend these seven and also with that, so that they can kind of
straighten out the roads and make it similar to what the rest of Saguaro Canyon looks
like. So, in this amendment they are proposing 21 new single-family residential lots on
approximately six acres. The lots range in size from 6,808 square feet to 20,861 square
feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission did -- held their hearing on February 17th
and the applicant's representativef ML Dave McKinnon, testified in favor of the
application. They also -- you know, all of my staff put in this little comment that says
they took oral and written.testimony, but I don't believe anybody else spoke against the
r ... ..... ..~
(d.~...
Meridian City Council
March 15. 2005
Page 26 of 49
application at that time. The key issues of discussion by the Commission were the
removal of the 24-foot flag lot extending to Meridian Road and that was in the original
Saguaro Canyon Subdivision approval that that needed to be removed when this
property was further developed. And, then, clarify -- clarification of the required street
section was per the Meridian fire department The fire marshal changed the standard to
read 33 feet face of curb to face of curb and on a rolled curb we are unable to measure
what the face of the curb is at that point, so we did change it back to the former
standard, which had been back of curb to back of curb. So, that was one of the key
changes to staffs initial recommendation. And, then, they did add -- they deleted a site
specific condition number two and, then, they added a site specific condition number
twof which references item number eight, page eight, of the development agreement for
Saguaro Canyon and I believe that was for a -- I forgot to look that up, but r believe that
was in reference to the 24 foot side lot. The other change was just filling in the numbers
on one of the fire department comments. They had been left blank~ So, it was just
filling in the numbers to read the proposed 21 lot subdivision, with an estimated 2.9
residents per household, it will have a total isolated population of 66 residents, so that
was just kind of a clerical cleanup. With that I will end staff's presentation.
De Weerd: Anna could repeat what the size ranges from of the lots?
Canning: They range from 6,808 to 20,861. I believe the 20,000 square foot Jot is
probably right here, just as you enter Ventana Subdivision. Is that the right name?
Ventana. Yeah~
De Weerd: Councilman Rountree?
Rountree: Madam Mayor~ If those sizes are current, how can it be zoned R-4?
Canning: They had a planned development~
Rountree: Okay~
Canning: The overall gross density of Saguaro Subdivision was for 3~09 acres -- I mean
3.09 units per acre. They did do a planned development, which included reduced
frontage requirements, cul-de-sac length, modifications to minimum lot size,
modifications to the minimum house size.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Rountree: I heard you say that the flag Jot that we have had numerous discussions
about over the months has been removed, but what's the fate of the flag-pole, if you
will? I mean who is going to claim ownership of that? Is it going to become a linear
weed patch? What's going on there?
(. ..
(('.-...
\
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 27 of 49
Canning: The specific -- the specific condition of approval in the original Saguaro
Canyon was that they needed to sell it to one of the two property owners. At the
Planning and Zoning Commission the appJicanfs representative did testify that they
talked to Mr. Priddy about purchasing that property.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions for staff? Okay. Is the applicant here. If you
will, please, state your name and address for the record.
McKinnon: Dave McKinnon, 735 South Crosstimber. We have read the
recommendations and agree with the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning
Commission and ask if you have any questions at this time.
De Weerd: Okay. Any questions for the applicant?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: We knew you would be back.
Rountree: We knew this would happen.
Bird: Yeah.
De Weerd: When you separated that piece out~ We just didn't think you would be back
so soon~
Rountree: You wouldn't take our advice.
De Weerd: Yeah. How can you comment on that?
Bird: Didn't you have a comment, Dave?
De Weerd: Okay. Council -- 11m sorry. Is there anyone who would like to provide
comment or testimony on this application? Okay. Any further information from staff
before we close the Public Hearing? Okay.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: J move we close the Public Hearing on Item 15.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. the motion is close the Public Hearing on 15. All those in favor say
aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
(
(::,.:.. .
Meridian City Council
March 15 r 2005
Page 28 af 49
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr~ Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve PP 05-001, Saguaro Subdivision, and to include staff and
applicant comments.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 15 and we won't say the name of that
subdivision --
Bird: Saguaro.
De Weerd: Name it something different. If there is no further discussion, Mr. Berg, will
you call roll.
Berg: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the CounciL Just a clarification. We are
approving the attached findings also in that motion. Thank you.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES~
Item 16:
Public Hearing: RZ 04~016 Request for a Rezone of .27 acre from R-4 to
0- T zone for Serendi~it~ Place Subdivision by Susan Howard - 1305
West 1 st Street:
Item 17:
Public Hearing: PFP 04-009 Request for Preliminary Final Plat approval
of 4 single family attached residential building lots on .27 acre in a
proposed Q-T zone for Serendioitv Place Subdivision by Susan Howard
- 1305 West 1st Street:
De Weerd: Thank you. Items 16 and 17~ I will open those two Public Hearings for RZ
04-016 and PFP 04-009. I will start with Anna's comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this project is located on Cherry
Lane. Not Cherry Avenue, but Cherry Lane and West 1 st Street. Cherry Avenue, not
Cherry Lane. I got that backwards. Sorry. This is the not-carrying-much-traffic Cherry
Street. Anyway, ifs located on the northwest corner there. And what the applicant is
proposing to do -- there is an existing home. They are proposing four attached single-
family homes on the property~ So, they would remove the existing home and, then,
there would be two structures, so they would be attached, but on separate lots for each
one. So, ies a four-lot subdivision that is before you today as a preliminary and final
c... :.
('~'.
\.~...:... .
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 29 of 49
pJat9 ThenJ they have also requested a rezone to Old Town along with this project.
OkaY9 The lots range in size from 2,331 square feet to 4t050 square feet. And the
minimum square footage of each residence would be 1,1 00 square feet. The future
homes on Lots 2 and 3 would share a common drive. And, then, four would take
access from 1 st Street and Lot 1 would take access from Cherry Avenue. OkaYa There
was a site specific condition of approval in the initial staff report regarding fire hydrants
and, essentially, it was unless otherwise allowed by the Meridian fire department, they
needed to provide corner -- a hydrant at the corner of Cherry Avenue and 1 st Street.
Since that time the applicant has been working with the fire department -- and I will have
an update on that condition of approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard
this item on February 17th. Kevin Harris, the appJicanes representative, spoke in favor.
There was one speaking in opposition. And the key issues of discussion were the
applicant requested to pay a well development fee, rather than install pressure irrigation
systems. And, then, since that time the issue of the hydrants has been resolved also.
The Commission did amend site specific condition number four on page ten of the staff
report by removing the requirement for the pressurized irrigation to serve each lot and
that in lieu of that requirement each lot would be required to pay the well development
fee. There is an e-mail, I believe, from Craig -- or between Craig and Kevin that
discusses the hydrant issue and, basically, the applicant was able to satisfy the
Meridian fire department that they had -- yeah -- that they had enough fire hydrants in
the area and one would not be required for this project9 I believe the way the condition
is currently worded, it would not need to be changed, because it says unless otherwise -
- n09 Unless there -- unless otherwise allowed. So, there is enough discretion there
that we don1t need to change the condition of approval. With that I will end staff's
presentation.
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Okay. Is the applicant here? If you will, please, state your name and
add ress.
Harris: Kevin Harris. Business address is 1800 West Overland Road in Boise9 Jim
speaking on behalf of the applicant S.usan Howard tonight again. We are in agreement
with all the conditions of approval on the subdivision and we ask that you approve us
tonight. If there is any questions for me, I would be happy to answer them.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, do you have any questions?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Could you give us some design detail on the proposed housing?
...(: .. .
c.... ... ..
(_.~
.\.
Meridian City Council
March 151 2005
Page 30 of 49
Harris: Design detaif as in what type of houses or--
Rountree: Do you have an elevation? Any information?
Harris: Correct. At the Planning and Zoning hearing we did give a photograph of the
type of housing that Susan would like to put up on the site~ I don't know if Anna has that
photograph still.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Rountree, that did not
make it into my records. The clerk's office probably got a copy of the photographf if you
want to take a brief -- ah. I can put it up on the --
Harris: That's the type of unit, except they will be attached. We have got some real
positive feedback from the neighbors in the subdivision that like the idea.
Rountree: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Any further questions? Thank you very much. Okay. Is there
anyone who would like to provide testimony on this application? Okay. Council. what
would you like to do?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Hearing no more testimony, I move we close Items 16 and 17, RZ 04-016 and
PFP 04-009.
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to close the public hearings on Items 16 and 17. All
those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve RZ 04-016, Serendipity Place Subdivision, and to
incorporate staff and applicant comments.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 16. If there is no further discussion,
Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
(
.u...~:......... .
f:. .
.t. ..
Meridian City Council
March 15 f 2005
Page 31 of 49
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Okay. Item 17.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: ML Bird.
Bird: I move we approve PFP 04-009 for Serendipity Place Subdivision and to include
all staff and applicant comments.
Rountree: Second.
De W eerd : The motion is to a pprove Item 17. M L Berg, will yo u call ro II.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 18:
Public Hearing: CUP 04-054 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development for retail uses in a C-N zone for The Shops at
Cherry lane by High Point Equities, LLC - SWC of West Cherry Lane
and North Ten Mile Road:
De Weerd: Item 18 is a Public Hearing on CUP 04-054. I will open this Public Hearing
with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this project is located on Cherry
Lane and Ten Mile and it located right next to the Grocery Bag Subdivision, which has
the Albertson's market on it. You can see it's a small, triangle shaped property,
currently vacant. The request that's before you tonight is for conditional use approval
for a planned development to allow two structures on the site. As you know, our current
code only allows one structure. So, that's the primary purpose of the planned
development Ifs already zoned C-N and already annexed into the city. As this was
being processed there was two site plans we were looking at, because the applicant
was working with some potential tenants and he was narrowing down his choices, so
the staff report talks about two site plans. At the Planning and Zoning Commission they
did just -- were able to focus on one site plan and thaes the site plan you see here
before you~ The site plan is for approximately -- the first building, A, would have 6,050
square foot of retail and, then, the second building would have 3,250 square feet of
retail. You can see that this -- the retail building A, the western most site is set up for a
bank, with the three drive-thru tellers~ The general traffic flow would come into the site
from the north, swing down and, then, go back around the northern buildings. There is
C. :.. .
I~~~... .
\:" "" :":
Meridian City Council
Ma rch 15J 2005
Page 32 of 49
also, you will note, a drive-thru on the south side of the southern building and, then, it
enters into the Albertson's parking lot. They are removing a number of the existing
parking spaces in the Albertson's parking lot -- let me look that up~ I believe it's six
existing spaces, but, then, they will develop 25 additional spaces. So, there are
reworking this areaf basically. And, then, the rest of the site had 27 parking spaces -_
one more down here that would make 28. And, then, three parking spaces that are
mostly within the Albertsonls Jot. That is the site plan that the Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed at their hearing on February 17th. They have recommended
approval of this project. The applicant's representative Brent Dixon testified in favor of
the application. There were several community members that testified in opposition.
The key issue of the discussions were the appropriateness of the drive-thru facility,
particularly -- or most specifically the one on the southern most building. The impact on
surrounding properties, particularly, those folks in Rodrs Parkside Creek Subdivision.
And the improvements and changes to the site layout in order to facilitate a more
functional site. And, then, screening for the property owners across the Eight Mile
Lateral. And, then, the reduced street buffer along Cherry Lane~ They are not able to
meet the full buffer -- street buffer requirements~ The existing street buffer on Cherry
Lane does jump significantly from property to property. It goes in to about five feet in
some areas and, then, some have required 25 feet. They are asking a reduction to the
20 feet -- to 20 feet in this area. There are specific provisions for unusually shaped
properties to allow a reduction in that buffer requirementf particularly when the -- kind of
the average width -- or length or depth of the property, which in this case would be
around here, is -- when the buffer would be substantial in relationship to the average
depth and it specifically allows a reduction in that buffer requirement. This evening the
applicant has given me a site plan -- and I will put it up in just a second -- that reflects
the changes that the Commission wanted to see~ Staff has not had a chance to review
the site planf but I do think it would be helpful for you to look at and also for the
neighbors to comment. So, just a moment. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, as
you can see, the applicant has reworked the drive aisle a little bit coming out of the
bank, which I was concerned about. They have also eliminated the drive-thru on the
south side of the southern building. They have kept the same number of parking
spaces, although they still have a compact spot here and I thought they were going to
put a plaza there. Again, staff has not had a chance to look at this, although it's a fairly
simple site and they seem to have met most of what -- the conditions that were asked
for. I wouldn't recommend -- I would recommend keeping the -- the findings are
specifically related to the former site plan, but I think this gives you an indication of -- in
meeting those conditions of approval, this is probably the site pJan that staff would
review for a certificate of zoning compliance~
Bird: The date on it?
Canning: The date is today's date. But, again, I'm not sure I would -- depending on
how the Council goes, J don't think J would recommend putting that in the findings,
because staff hasn1t reviewed this~ With that, JIJI end staff's presentation. ('m sorry~
De Weerd: Council, questions?
c.....
;..
t-r"...
\:.
Meridian City Council
March 151 2005
Page 33 of 49
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Bird: Anna, run me through how the -- after you come through the drive-up at the bank,
how are you going to get back out? Are you going to make a u-turn there or a hard
sharp right or do we go through Albertson's parking lot now?
Canning: I think the latter answer is about all you could do~ I don't think there is enough
turning radius with a large car to get back out to Cherry Lane.
Bird: So, I take it that's only going to be an entrance, then, that deal there?
Canning: We have not discussed making it an entrance only. If you were -- if you were
parked in the stalls, you could back out and go out that way~ It would just really be the
drive-thru traffic, unless they wanted to park and turn around. They would probably find
their way out through the Albertsonls parking lot.
Bird: Anna, I think thaes a pretty narrow drive-in, 28 feet, to be having two-way traffic.
Especially when you have got -- if you don't make it one way in, you're going to have
cars -- I don1t care what -- trying to swing out and get -- go back out that way from the
drive-thru.
Canning: The swing out is certainly a concern. The drive aisle -- we only require 25
feet by code. It is wider where it connects to Cherry Lane.
Bird: I agree 25 feet -- 28 is probably wide enough, but not in that circumstance~ I
mean you have to got to take each circumstance and look at it as to what width you
need. I mean you're going to have people -- I donlt care what you say, unless you have
it designatedf you're going to have people trying to get out and swing back out that way
and you're going to swing out into the other lane, I don't care how small of car you got.
Thatls the only thing I -- and we can ask the applicant when he comes forward what kind
of idea they have.
Canning: That was discussed and that is a concern, although I think we just envisioned
they wouldn't -- we didn1t have this much discussion at P&z.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions? Okay. Would the applicant like to come
forward. If you will, pleasef state your name and address.
Dixon: My name is Brent Dixon. I live at 23675 Southwest Robison Terrace,
Sherwood, Oregon. 97140. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you for
having this public meeting this evening~ J am currently in the process of purchasing the
land adjacent to Albertsonfs. This property right here is roughly 50,000 square feet. Ifs
zoned commercial. It has.the same zoning designation of the Albertsonls store adjacent
(.....:.
(
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 34 of 49
to it. Unlike the Albertson's store, though] it doesn't have the Conditional Use Permit,
which Albertson's was granted in I think 1996 when their store was approved. There
was actually some -- quite a bit of discussion at that time in terms incorporating this site
into the overall Grocery Bag Subdivision. The property owner at the time Wally Levan
and the developer just couldn't agree on price and so it was left out. But I believe the
City Council at the time recognized that this day would come when we all are here and
as a condition of approval for the Albertsonls project, a granted -- an easement was
granted to this parcel right here and so there is -- in fact, there is an existing
development agreement in place currently between the Albertson's, the adjacent shop
right here, and this is considered parcel three in the Grocery Bag Subdivision~ It does
have the access that we have outlined right here~ In terms of the types of retail use,
right now I'm in discussions with a bank, which would be right here. Just some
clarification~ The way the banks like to have their drive-thrus now is they like to have
one drive-thru where they have the teller window, they like to have a drive-thru next to
the teller window for their A TM machines and, then, they like to have a drive-thru lane,
which is just basically a pass-through lane~ You mentioned some concern regarding the
turn radius right here~ J can tell you that my architect and engineers have looked at this
and they tell me that this is sufficient, but I would be open to working with staff in
addressing this issue further, if staff deems that this is not sufficient. We do have a 30
foot wide drive aisle right here, because what tends to happen is you have got cars that
-- you knowJ somebody wants to make a right-hand turn, somebody wants to make a
left-hand turn and, then, you have to -- you have to have sufficient room if somebody is
making a right-hand turn in~ And so that's what the 30 feet gives you is enough space
for, really, three cars~ Twenty-eight would be a little tight for three cars, but there would
never be three cars that are passing through here at the same time, so I think 38 feet is
sufficient In terms of types of use, I mentioned a bank~ 11m also in discussions right
now with a cell phone company. I could see an ice cream parlor coming here. A
Hallmark type shop. A quick sandwich, Subway type use. There is some certain
obnoxious uses that J would be willing to -- as a condition of approval shy away from. I
don't think this is the right spot for a fuel center. I don't think ifs the right site for a
contemporary fast food restaurant in the sense of a McDonald's or a Taco Bell. As a
condition of approval, the Planning Commission asked if we would be willing to give up
the drive-thru right here and we were willing to do so. Not happilYf but notwithstanding.
As well as a condition of approval that -- there was some concern -- we are going to
hear about it in a moment from some of the neighbors as far as noise and lights go.
And some of these were -- were similar to the concerns raised when the Albertson's
originally was approved several years ago and part of that was mitigated by the erection
of this masonry wall and we have agreed to continue the wall up the southern edge of
the property and so -- and, then, also remove the drive-thru~ Questions?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I got a question. If you want two-way traffic there, is there any way you can bring
your landscaping around to where you narrow that exit from the bank over to the far --
(.' .
\...
(<-.
~<.:. .
Meridian City Co uncil
March 15 t 2005
Page 35 of 49
as far east as you can get it, so that you1re in that -- where they are actually turning, you
would be into where the little curve is right there? Take that -- yeah. Can we make
them line up single file -- because I know jf you got it wide enough for two cars, two cars
will try to get through there~
Dixon: Yeah~ That's something we tried to do where we recognized here it was
sufficient for three cars and, then, we narrow it to two cars, so I think your question is
could we narrow it even further to force the car right along here to be able to make that
turn.
Bird: Yeah~ Especially, because, see, you have got the little jog there that gives you a
little more width.
Dixon: To answer your question, I think we would certainly be willing to look at that and
as a condition of approval would ask that staff be granted, you know, to be able to
review that and approve that~
Bird: I would have no problem with that That's the only question I had.
De Weerd: Okay~ Anyone else have a question for the applicant?
Dixon: I have one further question. Is there a chance for rebuttal following some of the
neighbors?
De Weerd: Yes. You will have the last word~
Dixon: Okay.
De Weerd: Well, actually, the Council will.
Dixon: Council wilL They always get the last word. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you~ Okay. I do have several people signed up to testify or not, just
to indicate their support or opposition~ Stan Kelly is signed up against~ Would you like
to provide testimony? If you will state your name and address.
Kelly: I do have pictures. Stan Kelly~ 3492 West Fir Creek Court~
De Weerd: Okay~ You can hand that to staff~ If you will just wait a moment while she
loads that.
Kelly: While she's loading that -- because I can go through those really fast~
De Weerd: Okay.
(: .. .
\...~.
(.':._'V._ ..
Merjdian City Council
March 15. 2005
Page 36 of 49
Kelly: The concerns that I have is making exceptions for -- because they want to put
that much -- they have even increased the square footage from the P&Z meeting, but
they want to narrow the berm and I went out and measured all the rest of the berms that
are on that intersection and the one in front of St~ Luke's Medical Center is 30 -- is 32
feet at the narrowest and 51 feet on Cherry Lane~ The one -- yeah, just -- those first two
didn't turn out There we go. That's the wall that they have agreed to continue, but --
and I think thaes the canal right of way. Okay. We need to slow it just a bit. This is the
back of St Luke's Medical Center. This is the side of St. Lukefs Medical Center. You
can see trees~ And this is 26 feet. This is 51 feet out in front. This is 32 feet at the
narrowest place~ This is -- goes to 51, but the narrowest place where that bank is is 32
-- can we stop it?
Canning: Sir, if you could tell me how to stop it I would be happy to.
Kelly: Okay~ All right. This is the berm they are planning on tearing out between
Albertsonfs and the Levan property. That's 26 feet. Those trees are all six inch. There
is 26 feet there, so thatls how they get -- this is along the canaL They are planning on
cutting all the trees down. There is a big -- see a big old tree, a poplar tree, or
whatever. Most of our bedrooms are on the -- on the second -- see, our bedrooms will
be eye level -- even with a six foot stone fence, will be eye level with whatever is built
there. And so noise and lighting is a concern. And what I would suggest is those trees
-- those pine trees and deciduous trees make better neighbors over the years and so
you have required St. Luke1s -- or St. Ails Medical Center that's on the other corner, you
have required the other commercial businesses to have landscape barriers between the
neighbors~ So, basically, I'm not really asking for anything but the 26-foot wide one they
are tearing out to get their parking spaces, to put another one inside the canal right of
way. I think that it might not help us for 15 years until the trees grow up, but at least it
would be some hope and we just think ifs way too -- okay. You can end it. There is the
Levan property. But it looks like you have asked Idaho Central Credit Union to have all
these requirements and, basically, on the same size property that Idaho Central on the
other corner has to have, they are trying to put three big -- a bank and two big
businesses all on this small lot, so -- and the other concern would be --
De Weerd: If you can summarize, please.
Kelly: Okay. I will summarize real quick. The other concern -- and this was a concern
that Commissioner Mae had -- was that entrance at the -- on the canal side on the
neighborhood side, would become a racewaYt you know, especially if stacking goes
from Ten Mile and Cherry Lane, a raceway to where people would cut through there to
enter the parking lot, you know, to get to Albertson's, rather than if you had the entrance
where it currently is to the driveway for the Levan property, it would eliminate at least
the cutting through there and I think it would eliminate some of this -- well, if you had the
entrance over on this side, rather than on the neighborhood side, which if you put a
berm in there, there is really not room. And, then, I don1t think -- any new business in
the past ten years, I donlt know of any thaes got 20 feet in the front. It seems like they
are all at least -- at least 25 to 32. So, I know there is some five foot things, but thaes
C:.. :.'..
C.
~<...... .
Meridian City Council
March 15 ~ 2005
Page 37 of 49
on neighborhoods and, of course, if you look, everybody in their backyard, because of
the noise, has planted big trees all along, even on their property, so you don't have that
buffer -- buffer zone, you got a common area and, then, people plant trees in their
backyards~ So, my concern is noise and lighting and plus the whole esthetic thing~ I
think if you required the same thing they are tearing out there, you would really help the
neighbors if you grew up trees and stuff~ Thafs alii had~
De Weerd: Thank you~ Any questions for the --
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: For Mr~ Kelly? Thank you~ Okay. I believe there is a Mike Odd Ie. I don't
know. I couldn't read your writing. I'm sorry~ If you willf please, state your name and
address.
Oddle: Mike Oddle. 3416 West Elm Creek.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Oddle: I live right behind the building -- retail building B. I appreciate Mr. Dixon's
revised plan with the drive-thru missing.
De Weerd: BOYf that three minutes went fast.
Donnell: You're done~
Oddle: I guess my only concern now is the lots and the buffer zones. The canal
easement is 60 feet. It's 60 feet behind Albertson's, from AJbertsonls back fence to the
neighboring fence in the subdivjsjon~ When it gets to this property, they never did take it
from the farmer, so because of the tree line theref they just never pursued the buffer
zone, because the trees were there. So, they use the right of way on the other side of
the canal. With his proposal hers, I guess, been granted from the irrigation district going
all the way to the edge of the canal, so now we don1t have that buffer zone there, plus,
you know, hels getting smaller buffer zones in the front. That's -- like I said, changes
are nice. If they close up at a reasonable hour, I can live with that. I mean it's not too
bad.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you very much. And there is an M~ Chris something.
Chrisman: Mary Ann Chrisman~
De Weerd: Okay~ Mary Ann Chrisman has signed up against. And, please, state your
name and add ress.
Chrisman: My name is Mary Ann Chrisman and I live at 3440 West Elm Creek~ I am
also directly behind retail B and I was very much involved with the Albertson's years ago
(
(.<'..
\.........:
Meridian City Council
March 15 f 2005
Page 38 of 49
when they put their facility in. But what was more concerning was after Albertson1s put
their building in and I don1t know if the Council are aware of the problems that occurred
afterwards, it was so serious -- the lighting situation was so serious, our neighborhood,
as you know, has the elementary school and most of us have younger children all
around that area and when Albertson's went in, the lighting was such a serious problem
that all of us had to get blackout shades and it still wouldn1t work, our kids couldnft sleep
at night~ So, it got so serious that myself and several neighbors put a whole coalition
together and met with Afbertsonls and over a period of six months they ended up taking
all of their lighting out of there and reducing it So, my concern here is shared with the
rest of us, as far as the berm, and Albertson's also -- they put in such small trees and so
far part, it's going to take such a long time for it really to have an effect, but my concern
is whafs going to be in B. Are we going to have another lighting problem like we did
with Albertson's, because taking it -- if you remove part of the berm, it brings it that
much closer and, then, with the noise level and if there is any fighting concerns, we just
donlt want to go through what we did years ago, because it was quite serious and so I
don1t have a -- I don1t have a concern about the project being there, only that we are
real sensitive to what goes into B and have some pretty strict limitations on lighting
specifically and the type of business that's allowed in B~ And some real concern about
the landscape, so that our children in our neighborhood wonlt go through what all of us
went through back then and I don1t know if you all remember that or if you were aware
of what was going on.
De Weerd: Okay~ Thank you~ I don't think -- that came through while -- well, yes,
Councilman Rountree is old enough to remember.
Rountree: I can remember when it was a wheat field.
De Weerd: We appreciate your testimony.
Chrisman: Thank you~
De Weerd: I have Brandon Juarez signed -- Juarez. Sorry. Signed up for.
Juarez: Yeah~ For.
De Weerd: If you will, please, state your name and address for the record.
Juarez: Brandon Juarez. 935 South Island Glen, Eagle, Idaho.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Juarez: I am -- I have been friends with Mr. Dixon for about 15 years now and 11m the
designer on the project, so I thought I could probably clarify a few things and also 11m for
the project, because I designed it~ We -- Brent is a great guy, offered -- before we went
to the zoning commission I -- Brent offered and did a neighborhood mailing for a
neighborhood meeting, which he was at and, unfortunately, we could have solved a lot
(. .. .:
(~~<-:.:. ...
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 39 of 49
of these problems, but he1s still willing to solve problems. No one showed up, I don't
think. But since the last meetings when the neighbors showed up, we have tried to
solve their problems for them. Brent was really kind in reducing all those kind of things
that the neighbors want, the drive-thru and the wall and at much expense and so I just
wanted to speak to any of the concerns that the neighbors had tonight, 11m sure Mr.
Dixon will be able to solve those problems and speak to those issues. The front
setback for a building in the City of Meridian is 15 feetJ which conflicts with the
landscaping setback, which is 25 feet. We put our -- we have asked for a five foot
variance on the front setback to the drivewaYf not to the buildingJ to allow -- the reason
we are asking for that is because of the irregular-shaped lot and thaes why we were --
submitted that to Anna and she was able to approve that in her findings and so the front
landscape buffer is really onJy reduced by about five feet, but the building setback is,
actually, more like 20 -- letls see -- 32 feet setback from the front property line, rather
than the required 15 feet on the front. That speaks to the front. The trees in the back,
we have met with the irrigation district numerous times -- interesting bunch. We really
like them --
Rountree: Oh, now come on.
Juarez: But it's very difficult to work with them. They are nice people. They are
requiring us to cut all the trees down there. They don1t want any of the trees in the 30
foot setback between the canal -- the setback runs from the center line of the canal,
which Jim not really showing on there, but if you can envision a line in that center of the
canal to where the wall is indicated, thafs 30 feet and we are not reducing that setback
at all. I have heard previous testimony tonight that we are reducing that somehow.
Thafs all Levan property all the way to the centerline of the canal, but the canal has an
easement that goes 30 feet to the wall. So, we are not reducing that at all.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Juarez: Thafs -- thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Juarez: Any questions?
Donnell: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Donnell.
Donnell: Did the folks at the irrigation district give you a reason why those trees need to
come down?
Juarez: Yeah, they did.
Donnell: I mean I assume itfs for them to drive along there and keep the canal clean.
c.......
r:.^....
\.;..:.... . .
Meridian City Council
March 151 2005
Page 40 of 49
Juarez: Exactly~ Thatts their reasoning. Their reasoning is they want to be able to
keep that canal clean. There is an apple tree there that they hate, because it's -- apples
fall into the canal, there is a bunch of trees there that they pointed out to us when we
met with them that they really didn1t like and we would be -- 11m sure Brent could speak
to that issue -- be willing to plant any trees that we would be allowed by the canal
people to plant there to appease the neighbors.
Donnell: Madam Mayor, follow up?
De Weerd: Uh-huh~
Donnell: So, if the neighbors were -- which I heard them say that they hate the fact that
the trees are going to be taken out of there and I don1t blame them a bit If they were to
approach the irrigation district requesting that those trees stay -- I know that along an
irrigation kind of runoff ditch that I lived on trees were planted all along there. Now, in
the event that the irrigation people have to go along there, you know, then, trees go out
at the folks. expense, but until that occurs those trees are there and are beautiful, so --
Juarez: Right. Yeah. I don1t -- I can't speak to that. I mean if the neighbors want to do
that, thafs fine, but I don't know what the agreement is going to be and I can1t really
speak for Brent and what he wants to do, but 11m sure -- hels a very nice gentleman, so
he would be willing to do anything.
Donnell: Nice work.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: I thought I heard you say something about you would plant substitute trees,
as opposed to what the irrigation folks think are nuisance trees? And has anybody
given thought to -- some of those trees have been there a long time~ Years, as a matter
of fact, and having dealt with the irrigation district before, they like to give orders, but
you don't necessarily have to abide by them.
Juarez: Right. Right~ Like I said --
Donnell: Thafs on recordt Councilman Rountree.
Juarez: Mr. Dixon is a very kind gentleman, so he is very -- always trying to appease all
the parties in the developmentf so he can probably speak to the -- what they wanted
and what -- you know, what the neighborhood -- the neighbors might, you know, agree
to. There might be -- I mean 11m just -- as a suggestion, there might be a different tree
(^' ......:.
(~~~.
\. ..
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 41 of 49
we can put there that would appease the irrigation people, wouldn't drop too many
leaves or whatever, but --
De Weerd: Apples.
Juarez: Yeah. But not apples. Yeah. They don1t like those floating in the canal.
De Weerd: We try to avoid the bad apples.
Juarez: Anything else?
De Weerd: It's not even late. Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to
provide testimony on this application?
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I did want to point out there was
some testimony that there was additional square footage. If we assume that their retail
A-1 really isn't 22,207 square feet, that there is a typo somewhere on there -- it appears
to, actually, be less square feet than -- by about 220, 230 square feet than the one that
the Planning and Zoning Commission saw~ I just wanted to clarify that this is not
increased square footage.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Sir, please state your name and address.
Virden: My name is Mike Virden. J live at 3487 West Fir Creek~ Right behind the
project here.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Virden: And just from my dealings with, you know, from a capitalistic point, ifs -- they
are getting a lot of square foot -- a lot of building in a very small area, so 11m assuming
that the parking easements are being burdened by Albertson's, because I would
assume that to have 8,000 square feet of building in this small parcel that it's going to
require more than the amount of parking spaces that they are going to be allowed to
sustain and I think that, with the traffic and the way our neighborhood sits in relation to
this in terms of the children traffic to Albertson's or even to school and to create another
very aggressive easement into that parcel is going to change the complexity of our
neighborhood a little bit. And if there is an easement with Albertsonl5, then, maybe that
entrance into this parcel should be considered as that is their easement and that would
solve a lot of the problems, which I think this entrance is going to create~ If that -- I don't
know if that kind of makes sense, because -- I mean that's a whole lot of commercial
building to be put in a very small place. I'm not even sure that Albertson's has that
much commercial space next to them, with their extension that they have on their side
towards our neighborhoods. I just think we are just -- we are creating a huge amount of
action in such a small place and the proximity between the crosswalk for our kids to
school, you know, is pretty close and, you know, getting to Albertsonfs as well, is -- you
know, for the neighborhood type of a thingf you know, we do with our kidsf but, you
c
c.......... .
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 42 of 49
know, I'm all for something there. Obviously, it's zoned commercial for a reason, but I'm
not so sure this is what they had in mind in terms of the use, especially creating, you
knowt a pretty aggressive entrance into this small parcel with this much commercial
development in it~ I guess that would be my biggest concerns and, obviously, you
know, with the rest of the neighbors in terms of lighting and some type of a setback
away from our canal ditch would be, obviously, nice, too. But that's my -- my biggest
take on it, so --
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Any questions for--
Bird: f have none.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Virden: Thanks.
De Weerd: Is there any further testimony? If you will, please, state your name and
address~ You can pull that down.
N. Kelly: Okay. Nancy Kelly, 3492 West Fir Creek Court
De Weerd: Thank you~
N. Kelly: And I just wanted to mention two things. One, about the neighborhood
meeting, it was on Valentinefs weekend, it was the 13th and a Friday, really bad night
for any of us to go, so I just wanted to kind of clarify that. If it would have been maybe
on a Thursday or something like that, where we weren't going to plan something -- a
Valentinels outing, we would have attended that. The other thing I was thinking about
was resale value of our home. I was looking at the property, we are -- we are right west
of everything, so -- we are a two story house and so I was thinking when we decide to
move, which we may do eventually, and one of the reasons we like that neighborhood
was because of the resale value and being able to sell our home -- ifs already hard to
sell your home when you're right on Cherry Lane, but, then, if we have lots of lighting
and other things like that, that would shine into our home, it just seems like that -- that
may make our price come down, so that's just kind of a very personal reason why 11m
thinking that I donft know if I want lots of lights right there, so that's about all I have to
say.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Is there any further testimony? If there is no further
testimony, would the applicant like to come up for -- they call it the rebuttal, but I hate
that word. For your final comment.
Dixon: Yeah. I will be brief. One of the neighbors mentioned how they like to walk from
their neighborhood over to the Albertson's and this might be a little bit problematic if
they are trying to get into Albertson's. We can add a -- we can add a gate somewhere
right here, if we'd like to, :that way the neighbors could walk along this easement right
c:.:.::... ..:
(~.'..: .
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 43 of 49
here and, then, access a gate. The other question was in reference to the trees. The
neighbors are absolutely right. Some of these trees along the canal easement are
beautiful trees. I would love to keep those trees and would be open to partnering with
the neighbors and approaching the canal -- the irrigation company. I have talked to Bjfl
and John several times and I feel I have got a little bit of a rapport and would be willing
to see if we can make some exceptions for some of these trees, because it's clear that
they have been there for years and years and years and there is right now -- the
irrigation company does most of their access along this side of the canal right here
where there is a wide road and so, hopefully -- hopefully they will let us keep some of
these trees. There was also some questions about -- about the easement right here.
This is a 3D-foot easement and it extends all the way up, then -- and, then, we have a
bit of an encroachment on the easement that we have already approached the irrigation
company about for this rock wall that the Planning Commission had asked us to put up~
J don1t know how it -- I donI! know how this rock wall would go in relationship to the
trees, if we -- if we try to keep the trees and, then, you require a rock wall, I might ask
for some flexibility -- to grant flexibility to staff that if we are able to keep some trees
there, then, maybe we can make some adjustments with the wall. The narrow -- the
narrow berm has -- up here 20 feet, that has to do with the depth of the lot, particularly
on this west side. The lighting that was referred to, I would like to know what -- the
outcome of some of the neighborhood meetings that you had several months ago with
Albertson's and I would, you know, be willing to submit myself to some of those
outcomes. It sounds like it was favorable in terms of lighting. Right now 11m a little bit
familiar with your ordinance on lighting and believe that there is things that you can do
from an engineering perspective with reflectors and directional lights, the lighting and
different candle light wattages to minimize some of that light pollution that the neighbors
are concerned about and 11m willing to do those things. Parking was another issue. The
-- right now, given the number of parking stalls in the Albertson's lot, it's 302 parking
stalls. They have 57,000 square feet, roughly, with the shop space adjacent. They are
overparked by 18 stalls. With the addition of the 9,000 square feet, the parking that we
have here, these nine, nine, eleven, three, as well as this area right here, the overall
ratio in aggregate for the entire development is identical, itls overparked by about 18
stalls~ Let's see. What else. Noise. Some of the things that we can do for noise,
basically, is the type of tenants you attract to the area~ 11m told by Anita Levan that often
that the Albertsonls big refrigeration trucks park along this property line right here and,
then, they leave their trucks running for hours on end and that creates a lot of noise and
that goes away with this site plan, because there is really no way for them to park
anymore, so I think that helps a little bit in that regard. And I think I have addressed
everything. Any other questions?
De Weerd: Council, any questions for the applicant?
Bird: I have none.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle~
(" : ...
(..~<.:.
Meridian City Council
March 15 t 2005
Page 44 of 49
Wardle: Two questions. One was I heard you say that you would like to keep the trees
and certainly I agree. If that's not a possibility, would you be willing to work with the
irrigation district to possibly replace some of those if they need to be --
Dixon: Yeah. We can do two things. Welt first of all, if you look on the -- from the
Planning Commission meeting, item number fiver the applicant shaH work with city staff
on the placement of additional trees on the propertYf which adds up to a caliper
measurement of eleven. So, I think there was already a recognition by staff that, gosh,
we want to do something in terms of adding additional trees to this development. SOf to
answer your question we will abide by that -- by the staff recommendation. And, then,
the second question was can we put trees up that might not be apple trees that the
irrigation canal would be more apt to want to live with and the answer is yes~ And we
can work with city staff on -- on really defining what that amount would be.
Wardle: And my second comment goes to lighting and certainly the height of the
parking lot lighting, as well as the ability to directional-ize them down is something that
you can certainly work with staff on, but I think one of the concerns is how you treat this
building here and the lighting for the rear of being close to the neighborhood there.
Dixon: Yeah. This light -- this rear light here -- because there is no really entrance on it
-- J guess it depends on if -- if we have -- if a retailer at 10:00 Of clock at night takes their
garbage out back this way through a back entrance, would there be some sort of
building lights along the perimeter or along the edge of this building right here and my
sense is that there probably would ber but we would position them, you know, low
enough that they shouldnlt be a problem. Not to exceed ten feet. Brandon? Okay. We
could do that.
Wardle: Okay.
Dixon: One item and that is on the rock wall -- or the masonry wall that the Planning
Commission had asked us to construct. In the -- as a condition they said along the
entire property line. 11m a little bit worried the way that's been worded, because the
entire length of the property line would take it up to here, which creates a safety concern
for cars as the exit and so we would be willing to take it up so far as the setback would
deem it safe for cars for ingress and egress.
De Weerd: Council. any further questions? Thank you very much.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, regarding the last item, the concrete
masonry wall, we would not allow him to put it within the sight vision triangle, so I think
that there are sufficient protections for that. Staff does have a little bit of concern about
the tree issue. Just that I don't -- if they are not going to let him keep existing trees that
aren't the trash trees, the likelihood of them letting him plant trees is probably pretty
small. We haven't seen a lot of success in that area, but as Charlie -- or, 11m sorry,
( ..
(V~ ,.. .
.::,.. .
~..~:.. .. .. .
Meridian City Council
March 151 2005
Page 45 of 49
Councilman Rountree probably worded it best, but -- so, I think they are probably more
likely to keep some trees than get new trees, probably~
De Weerd: Well, since the easement's on the other side of the ditch, thafs not a reason
to clear those trees. I know their concerns are the roots and the ditch bank. That's
generally what their concern is, but it's been there for --
Rountree: It hasn1t been an issue for over 20 years~
De Weerd: Exactly~ Okay. Council?
Bird: I have no more.
De Weerd: Okay.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Hearing nobody wanting to talk, I move that we close the Public Hearing CUP 04-
054.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to close the Public Hearing on Item 18. All those in favor say
aye. All ayes~ Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Any discussion or any information you need further from staff? Willi have a
motion, then? Are you alive?
Bird: We are awake.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we approve Item 18, CUP 04-054, Conditional Use Permit for The
Shops at Cherry Lanef to include all staff, applicant, and public comments, with regard
to specifically the entrance and the width of the northwestern most entrance, as well as
the ability to work with staff approval on both parking Jot and building lighting and
additional landscape measures and not to approve the findings at this time, but to come
back for those.
Bird: Second.
('.. ..
tr~...,
T.~ ~~.... .... .
Meridian City Council
March 15. 2005
Page 46 of 49
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 18 with the changes as stated. Is
there further discussion?
Rountree: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Just a question. Having heard the motion, probably for ML Nary, is there a
variance request -- is there a variance required for the -- to meet the setback in
landscaping, so narrowing of the landscape is not a variance?
Canning: Councilmember Rountree, can you -- we can't hear you.
Rountree: Thank you, Keith. The narrowing of the landscape berm in front, though they
meet the setback requirements, that's not a variance?
Canning: No, sir. It's alternative compliance and they have submitted separate
approval. I generally make those decisions if it's not coming to you, but if it's coming to
you, then, I look for your action.
Rountree: Just wanted to make sure we don't miss --
Canning: Yeah. No. And it was not a discussion item by the neighbors at the Planning
and Zoning Commission hearing~
De Weerd: So, did your motion address the trees?
Wardle: I believe it did with the additional landscape -- working with staff, neighbors,
and the other public entities.
De Weerd: Okay. Does staff have enough information from this motion to prepare new
findings?
Canning: 11m a little unclear on what you want as far as additional trees or if you want to
keep the trees or -- did you want them in the easement?
Wardle: The motion stated, really -- you have already addressed the additional caliper
inches to mitigate on the site with the site-specific condition. lid like flexibility to allow
the current trees to stay or additional trees, if allowed by the irrigation district to be
planted. And so to have that as an additional flexibility for compliance~
Canning: Council -- Mayor and Councilmember Wardle, did you mean the 11 caliper
inches could be planted somewhere in the easement if allowable or did you want
additional calipers --
tOO .
t-=-.. .. :
(,.
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 47 of 49
Wardle: I don1t want to require additional calipers, but would like to somehow allow that
to happen jf it were to -- does that make sense?
Canning: Okay. Yeah.
Wardle: Okay.
De Weerd: So, you1re asking for permission? I thought the discussion was just to leave
them on the site.
Bird: If possible.
Wardle: Yes.
De Weerd: Okay. J will be interested to read this finding.
Wardle: 1'm really Jooking for an allow-ability for staff to allow flexibility to work with both
the neighbors, the irrigation districtt and the applicant.
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Is there any further discussion or clarification needed? Anna,
do you need anything further?
Canning: Just so I make sure I understand. I understand the trees issue and the other
one was lighting requirements for parking and structures and the width of the entry aisle
for the -- basically the drive-thru?
Wardle: Yeah~ To address Councilman Birdls discussion with the entry aisle.
De Weerd: Okay.
Canning: Thank you, Mayor~
De Weerd: Okay. Is there anything further? ML Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 19:
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
De Weerd: Thank you. And thank you all for staying with us tonight. The next item is
our delinquency list. Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-21, delinquent water users
shall have the right to request a pre-termination hearing prior to water service being
disconnected. No water users having requested such a pre-termination hearing for
March 15th, 2005, water service for the attached turn-off list will be terminated on March
16th, 2005. The total amount of the turn-off is $36,536.63.
{..... ...">
(~ ,
Meridian City Council
March 1St 2005
Page 48 of 49
Donnell: So moved.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to approve the turn-off list as presented in front of you. If
there is no further discussion, Mr. Berg, wifl you call roiL
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 20:
Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345(1)(c) and (f):
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 20 is an Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-
2345(1 )(c) and (f). Do I have a motion?
Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho Code 67-2345(1 )(c) and (f).
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to go into Executive Session. Mr. Berg, will you, please, call
ro II.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session.
Donnell: So moved.
Wardle: Second.
De Weerd: Okay all those in favor say aye.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
De Weerd: I would also like to hear a motion to adjourn.
Rountree: So moved.
Donnell: Second.
(:...... .....
(:........ '.
Meridian City Council
March 15, 2005
Page 49 of 49
De Weerd: All those in favor say aye.
ALL AYES~ MOTION CARRJED~
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:34 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE F THE.,SE PROCEEDINGS)
1- / ~ / ()~
DATE APPROVED
M
(... ..
(:r..
-:.:~.... ..
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CU P 04-053
March 15, 2005
APPLICANT ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered
ITEM NO~
5-8
REQUEST Findings for Approval - Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Developmel
for a clinic / office in an l-O zone for OB/GYN Associates - south of East Franklin Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORN EY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETfLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
S e~ 0- t lO_aJ~ FOret Lr~ ~
~
Contacte
Emailed:
Phone:
.-r tt~~ tOt- 7--(--rA LJ(,
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
t.. .
\..... .
nNDINGSOF~CT,CONCLUSIONSOFLAWXN
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of OBGYN ASSOCIATES
Case No(s). CUP-04-053
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 15, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecuti.ve weeks prior to
tIle City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written notice
luailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the pro.perty~ TIle notice of.public hearing .before tIle
City Council was .posted upon the property u.nder consideration lTIOre than one week
before said hearil1g. All other noticing was done consistent with Idallo Code 967-
6509 ~
The Inatter was duly considered by the City Council at the MarcIl 3, 2005, p.ublic
hearing(s)~ The applicant, affected property owners, and governlnent subdivisions
.providing services witllin the planning jurisdiction of the City of M eridi all were
givell full opportunity to express comlnents and s.ubmit evidence.
b. Oral testilnony was received on tllis matter, as reflected in the records of the City
Clerk (for written testitnony) and in. the official meetil1g minutes (for oral
testimony).
c~ The Plaooi.ng and Zoning Commission conducted a p.ublic hearing and iss.ued a
written reCOlTIlnel1dation on the subject matter to the City Council.
d. The City COUI1Cil heard and took oral and writtel1 testimony and duly COl1sidered tIle
evidence and tile record ill this matter.
2. Process Facts
a. There 1188 been cOlnpliance with all notice and hearing requirements set fOlth in
Idaho Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~~ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by tIle Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with tIle staff report.
3. Ap.plication and Prope.rty Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLusrONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). CUP-04-053_ - PAGE] of4
("
//......
(
a. In addition to the ap.plication and property facts .noted. in the staff report and the
Planning & Zoning Recommendatio.n for the subject ap.plication(s), it is hereby
verified that the .property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance oftllese
findings are Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, Warner G. Nistler, Manager.
4. Required Filldings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a. See Exhibit D for the findings required for each type of application.
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the .powers cOl1ferred upon it by the ".Local Land
Use Plaruling Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.e. ~67-
6503).
2~ The .Meridian City Council takes judicial .notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Developlnent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 a.nd 12, .Meridian City Code, and all
CUITent zoning maps thereot: The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, establis.hed tile
Ilnpact Area and the Alnended COffi.prellensive PIall of the City of Meridian, which was
ado.pted Au.gust 6,2002, Resolution N.o. 02-382 and M:aps.
3. The conditions s.hall be reviewable by tIle City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code
g 11-17 -9.
4.. Due COl1sideration 118S been given to the cOIUlnent(s) received froIn the govemlnel1tal
subdivisions .providillg senrices in the City of Meridian planllil1g jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by tIle proposed develo.plnent will 110t
ilupose expense upon tIle pu.blic if tIle attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordal1ce witll this Decision, wllicl1
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
th.e applicant, tIle Plallnillg and Zoning Department, tIle Public Warks Department and
allY affected party requesting notice.
7 ~ That this approval is su.bject to th.e Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Site Plan dated
January 24, 2005 as shown ill :Exllibit B and tIle ConditiollS of Approval in Exhibit C..
The conditions are COl1cluded. to be reasonable and the applicant s11alllneet such
requirements as a COl1dition of approval of the ap:plication.
C.. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided. in Meridian City Code 9 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and foregoil1g Findings of Fact whicl1 are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1 ~ The applicant's CUP Site Plan as evidenced by having subtnitted the Site Plan. dated
January 24, 2005 is hereby conditionally approved; and
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). cur-04-053_ - PAGE 2 of4
(.
.:-:........." "
j""
t,,:.:.. .
2. TIle site specific and standard conditions of ap.proval are as shown in. Exhibit C.
D. Notice of A.pplicable Tilne Lilnits
1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Mo.oth Conditional Use Permit Duration
Please take 110tice that the COllditional use permit shall.be valid for a maxilnum period
of eighteen (18) :months unless otherwise approved .by tIle cou.nciL During tllis time,
the permit holder lnust commence tIle .use as .pe.nnitted in accordance with the
conditions of a.p.proval, satisfy the requiremel1ts set forth in the co.nditio.ns of approval,
acquire building pennits and cOlrunence co.nstruction of pennanent footings or
structures on or in the ground. In this context "structures" sllall include sewer and
water lines, streets or building construction~ The ap.plicant 11as specified ill the
application and to the cOIn.mission alld council a construction scl1edu.le and cOlnpletio.n
date for the project If tIle cOlTI.pletion date specified for the project is exceeded, tIle
conditional use application sIlalI becolne n.ull and void. However, the ap.plicant may
submit an application for a time extension on the project for city council review. The
application for tilne extension sIlall be sublnitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the
deadline for cOffi.pletion of the .project For projects requiring .platting, the final plat
must be recorded within this eigllteen (18) month period. For projects with lTIultiple
.phases, tIle eighteen (18) month deadline sllall apply to the first pllase~ In tIle event tl1at
tIle developlnent is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, su.ch
phases shall be constructed withil1 successive intervals of one year froIn tIle original
date of approval by the co.u.llcil. If the successive pllases are not submitted witl1in one
year intervals, tIle conditional ap.proval of the future pl1ases shall be .uull and void.
(MCC 11-17-4.B~)
E. Notice of .Final Action and Rigllt to Regulatory Takings Analysis
I. T.he Applicant is hereby 110tified tllat p.ursuant to Idal10 Cod.e 67-8003, tIle Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request IUUst be in writing, and must be filed
with the City Clerk 110t lTIOre tllan twenty-eight (28) days after th.e final decision
concenlillg the Inatter at issu.e" A request for a regulatory ta.kil1gs al1alysis will toll the
tilue period within Wl1ich a Petition for Judicial Review Inay be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursua.nt to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected .person being a person who has
an interest ill real .property whicll1nay be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the conditional.use pennit approval may witllin twenty-eight (28) days after tIle date of
tllis decision and order see.k a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idallo
Code~
F. Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal Descri.ption
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). CUP-04-053_ - PAGE 3 of4
(."'... .
....::= ....... "" "
f"
\..
Exhibit B: Approved Site Plan
Exhibit C: Final Conditions of A.pproval
Exhibit D: Conditional Use Pennit Findil1gs
By action of the City Council at its regular Ineeting held 011 the 15 -16: day of
/11 tI/lijr-~ ,2005.
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN W ARD:LE
VOT.ED
~
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTE.D
COUNCIL MEMB:ER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOT:E.D
COUNCIL MEMBER I(EITH BIRD
VOTE:O
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAICER)
-
VOTED
Attest:
atld City Attorney.
Dated: (~-, ~ -05
By:
City Clerk's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LA WAND .DECISION & O.RDER
CASE NO(S). cur-04-053_ R PAGE 4 Of 4
~....
(....
EXHIBIT A
OBGYN Associates CU.P-04-053
Legal Description
DESCRIPTION FOR
MEOLAND PARCEL w MEADOW LAKE VILLAGE
TOUCHMARK CENTER
December 14~ 2004
A PARCEL OF lAND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 1 ~ BLOCK 2J OF TOUCHMARK
UVlNG CENTER SUBDlVJSJON No, 1 ~ LYING IN THE NW 114 OF SECTION 16.
7"OvVNSHIP 3 NORTHt RANGE 1 EAST~ BOISE MERIDIAN. CITY OF MERtDIAN, ADA
COUNTY. IDAHO. ~J10RE PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,
COMMENCiNG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1~ BLOCK 21 OF
TOUCHMARJ<: LIVING CEf\lTER SUBDIVISION No: 11 LYING iN THE N\^I 1/4 OF
SECTION 16. T, 3N'1 R 1 E,~ B.fvtl CITY OF ~AERIDJAN, ADA COUNTY. IDAHO~ AS
RECORDED AT THE ADA COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE IN BOOK 89 OF PLATS.
PAGES 10313 TO 10316~ THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS
n F Sr: R I PT 10 N
THENCE N 00020'1 Ti W 260-00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A
POINT;
THENCE N 89~39'43" E 165.00 FEET TO A POfNT~
THENCE S 00920117'1 E 58.01 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE ALONG A (~URVF TO THE LFFT 31,34 FEET. SAID CURVE HAVtNG A
RADIUS OF 50-00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35~55'0T\ TANGENTS OF 16.21
FEET. AND CHORD WHICH BEARS S 18"'1 T50" E 30,83 FEET TO A POINT OF
T ANGENCY~
THENCE S 36015'24" E 149, /7 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF
WAY OF E: LOUiSE DRtVE~
ALONG SAJO NQRTHERL Y RIGHT OF WAY AS FOLLOWS:
THENCE S 38~441361' W 20,47 FEET TO A POjNT OF CURVATURE~
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 85,31 FEET, SAID CURVE HAViNG A
RADIUS OF 96,00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50~5510 T\ TANGENTS OF 45.71
FEET~ AND CHORD WHICH BEARS S 64~12f10" W 82.53 FEET TO A POINT OF
T ANGENCY~
THENCE S 89~39~43u W 174.94 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF TH!S
DESCR1PTtON
SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 1,22 ACRES ( 531108 S,F,l, MORE OR LESS.
(Y":.-.
EXHIBIT B
OBGYN Associates
CUP-04-053
Approved Site .Plan
I
f
I j ~
I H~~ 5 ! ;.;, ·
. . , ~ ~ {It .1' i
HH 1:~ ':f~ ~. -i~t
! ;~H tn ~1 Jt ~;j
t! ~~,~ ~~~ Ii J. i ih
4\'~<tl~ "
'{ ~t}
~ ~ ~i~ ~
~~l;;~
:':-'-~ '~': H ~ ',h' ~ L~~ ; f~ v: ,~,,::' r. ~ (~ ~'": ::: :
~
':: . : ~ :f ~ .'. ") .: .:; ~:. ~ ~'.:.~ \.; ,~'l ~. ....": . : ." ~. ~ ( :
.~( E .:: ~..:: i (: h<>.'~. r: ~: P.
r !i' t.J
J ! jl ,..: .i~
n 1. : b ;.. ~~
r .
......: :... ..: ... ... ... .:: :. ~........ : : ..:~:.:.i""". . .. ... ... ... 'll
!i .. :
. . t. .(.1 ~;)
t . ~~F
I .
~
I
1
k
~4
~J
(~)
r. .j;. '.tU .0 ~
.1 room .
t. ~!l i.-.~~iil
; df ,~~h~
,:.t. k>:......~.~... ." ir ~!~it ~
J. --() ~~i~~ ,,~. 'i
l~ ~ ..,.......~ ... { ~!f! ~i ~;
(::)
.tr
: ~
. ... . .:. :;.... ..:..: ~. ..::.: ::... .~...~ ~...~.~.~ ~'~::j .
~ . . ... I~' -i . . .. r
k.... :~, ~ H. r. .4 '. . ~~
~
~
u
a.
it
6
tj
~H
. n 1
~ ~H
: ~ I ~ ,
:i1 it i 1! i! i~ i t t~.:y~.:'.':.~,.. .... ....... e
t~
! .,"'.,.....Y..~..,............j { ~' .~ . ~
J..:..:."<.::f:~~r~ ~ +flr... i~~ ;... f~: f:.."f.:..r ii~):::..i: r~)
c.,) I
~;
fiT.i..: .... .:......:.: ......:...."'~: ...;J '.yO,~., .,., ... .Y.. ..... "y.($-
,..: ,... :.: .:....:: .:.<~;:>.;. . . . .. . . ,..;. ..:: ~. ..: .:."~~>:~,
. .-.- .
.....:.::.::::::.:::.:..::.... ... '\ .:;/j:~/ ,~;:..r,. ... ... ~\....
: ~~
r.~'. ~.. .... ..~;}.
oJ ~...
L .~ .. .- ~). - I .l
: : It L 1.. ...:. . . . . . .. . ..:.J. .'... .
~ .~: :.: I r ... .: . .
,~
~~
. ~~
. ~~
(~)
~ ! ~J ~l _..~~..)1 rt < :~ I~~~J j!. r J '. .0 C'
~ h J ....d t . I H ~ It ;. ~: . .
· ~< .1 .~~ 1 ~." ~.~ ~ J .~~,.~~. ~,; r:"~ ~ <<0 ~ .~.,..r..., ~ ~ ~!~r< '.,~~:
~
H i i; i~
!. ! .. . , .," ,./
- · -" frr ...'
lEi
~ f I <:
. < If;
~ ~ ~ F
t ~ -, t:t ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ .J
:ij.~ t: .~ ; ; 1; ~ 11- t r:o. r
( :: t.i .~ ~ i":;-! .f ~ ..... I:i :I.;:
IH
~ ;
r
I~~
If 1 ~~
I~ ~
I k
!, (~
,: ,')
Iii. ~);. I ~ o:~::'~~~~'f~:~,~.: aw)
I .
(. .
(.....
EXHIBIT C
OBGYN
CUP-04-053
Final Conditions of Approval
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. The Lot 1 Block 2 of Touclunark ~Living Centers Subdivision .F:P-02-006 requires
a lot line adjustlnent prior to issuance of any building permit or certificate of
zoning compliance.
2. Fire Lanes: Due to the proposed accesses to th.e buildi.ngs, the fire departtnent is
requesting placemellt of additional :hydrants onsite. Staff notes that the proposed
site plan (Al ~ 1 dated 12.15.04) s.hows no hydrants 011 the site. A .hydrant shall be
installed alol1g Louise Drive and another along the access lane in the vicinity of
the staff parking lot north of the building as defined by Joe Silva on 1.21.05.
3. Parking: A cross access agreelnent for access to the north and east of tIle site
sllall be filed prior to issuance of any building perInit or certificate of zoning
compliance.
4. Setbacks: The site plan depicts the .proposed setbacks for tIle project. Staff
reCOlTIlnends approval of the proposed setbacks for the project. See co:nditions #1
al1d 2 below.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Setbacks are approved as depicted on the site plal1 (AI. 1 dated 12.15.04). Tlle
luinilTIUm parking setback shall .be 0' feet to the .north and tIle project layout sIlalI
relnain in substantial cOln.pliance with the approved site plan.
2. Parking is approved as depicted on the site plan. Millor lTIodifications can .be
"lnade, .if necessary, d.u.ring tb.e CZC process as l011g as the o.verall .parking ratios
relnail1 ill conformance with tIle Meridian City Code~ If upon future redesign of
Block 2 of To u clun ark Living Center Su.bdivision tIle access to the east of tIle site
becomes a public right of way then tIle parking stalls alo.ng the east side of the
building shall be eliminated.
3. All surface parkiJlg sIlal1 cOl1form to the IniniIn.um dilnensions per ordinance of 9'
x 19' with 25' wide dr.ive aisles. COlnpact stalls are ollly allowed in the staff
parking lot to the nortl1 of tIle .building as depicted on tIle site .plan (A 1.1 dated
12. 15 ~ 04 ) .
( ..
(,:......: ..
4~ T.he landscaping is approved per the landscape plans (s.heets Ll~O) dated 12~15.04~
All street trees sIlalI be deciduous species, as s.hown; conifers will be allowed
internally as sllown.
5. Tllis conditional use pennit sllaIl be subject to the expiration provisions set forth
in MCC 11-17-4~B.
6. Applicant lnust cOlnply with th.e conditio.os of th.e annexation, plat, :plalUled
developlnent, and developtnent agreelnent for Toucl11nark Living Centers.
7. All exterior ligllting, whether attached to the building or located witllin the
parking lot, sIlall be down-shielded or otllerwise altered so that the light does not
spillover onto adjacel1t properties or right-of-way. All .parking lot ligllting sl1all
be in accordance with Ordillan ce 11- 13 -4C.
8. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sectio.il 11-14 of
the City Zoning and Develo.pment Ordinance. All signage is subject to design
review and shall require separate :permits~ Signs shall confonn to the requirements
of the Planned. Sigll Program ap.proved for Meadow Lake Village on 11/27/02 and
as submitted with tIle ap.plication.
9. All constluctio.n and site ituprovements shall COnfO.flTI to tIle requirelnents of the
Alnericans with .Disabilities Act and the adopted building and fire codes.
1 O~ A drainage plan desiglled by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is
reg uired and shall be sub.m.i tted to tIle City Engineer (Ord. 557, ] 0 -1- 91) for all
off-street parking areas. Stann water treatment a.nd disposal must be designed in
accordance with Department of Enviromnental Quality 1997 publication Catalog
of Stann Water Best Mallagement Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and
City of Meridian stal1dards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface water is
.prohibited unless the jurisdictio.n which has authority over tIle receivil1g streal11
provides wlitten authorization prior to development plan approvaL The applicant
is responsible for filing all necessary applicatio.ns with the Idaho Departlnent of
Water Resources regarding S.hallow Injection Wells.
11. Certificate of Occupancy: All required ilnprovelnents Inust be complete prior to
obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed developlnent A temporary
Certificate of Occupancy may be o.btained by providing surety to the City in the
fo.rm of a letter of credit or cash in. the alTIOunt of 11 0% of tIle cost of the required
improvetnents (includillg .paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation)~ A bid
must accompany any request for telnporary occupancy.
12. Sal1itary sewer and water service shall be via existil1g service lines in :Meadow
La.ke Village tllat will .be extended as .palt of this proposed development
A:pplicant shall coordinate size and routing witll the Public .Works Departlne.nt
c......
(,_.'~n..: .
13~ Underground year-round .pressurized i.rrigation lnust be provided (from an.
existing system) to all landscape areas on tllis site.
FI.RE DEP ARTM.ENT
1. Acceptance of the .water supply for fire protection will be by tIle Meridian Fire
Departlnent and water quality by the Meridian Water Departtnent for bacteria
testing.
2. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locatio.ns shall be by the Meridian :Fire
Departlnent.
a. Fire Hydrants sllalll1ave the 4 Yl" outlet face the Inain street or :parlcing lot
aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant sIlaIl not face a street which does not have addresses on
it.
c~ Fire .hydrant markers shall be .provided per Public Works spec.
d. Locations with fire l1ydrants s.halI have tIle curb .painted red 10' to each
side of the hydrant location~
e~ ,Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers wIlen spacing permits.
f~ Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical o.bstructions to outlets within 1 0' ~
g. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finisIl grade.
3. The phasing .plan .may require that any roadway greater than 150' il11e.ngth that is
not provided with an outlet shall be required to have a.n approved tun1 around.
4~ All entrance and internal roads sllall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius~
5~ All Comm.on driveways shall be straig11t or have a turning radius 0[28' inside and
48' outside and s11all 11ave a clear drivin.g surface Wl1ich is 20' wide.
6~ Operati.onal fire hydrants and temporary or .pennanent street signs are required
.before cOln.bustible construction begins.
7. COlumercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent witll the
International Fire Code to service tIle proposed project. .Fire l1ydrants shall be
placed per Appendix D.
8. The lnedical office lot will have an unknown transient population and will have an
unktlow.n ilnpact on Meridian Fire Deparhnent call vo]umes~ T.he Meridian Fire
Department has ex:perienced 2397 respO.l1ses in tIle year 2003. According to a report
completed by Fire & Elnergel1cy Services Consulting Group our requests for service
are ,proj ected to reach 2800 ill tlle year 2005 and 3800 by the year 20 1 O.
(.. .
(..
9. Maintain a separation of5' from the .building to the dumpster enclosure.
104 Provide a Knox.box entry systelTI for the cOlnplex prior to OCCUpatlCY.
11. TIle first digit of the Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level.
12~ All processes & storage practices shall be required to cOlnply with tIle International
Fire Code.
13. Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International :Building & :Fire
Codes.
14. Wllere a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or Inoved into or
witlrin the jurisdiction is lTIOre tllan 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire
apparatus access road, as Ineasured by an approved route arOUl1d the exterior of the
facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided w.here required
by tIle code official. For buildings equipped. througllout with an approved autolnatic
sprinkler systelTI installed in accordance with Section 903.3 .1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a~ For Group R-3 alld Grou.p U occupal1cies, the distance requirelnent sIlall be
600 feet (183 m).
b. For buildings equipped t11fou.ghout with an ap.proved autolnatic sprinkler
systelTI installed in accordance with Section 90343.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the
distance require.lnent shall be 600 feet ( 183 ill).
15. Tllere shall be a fire l1ydrant within 100' of all fire de.partment c01U1ections~
POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENT:
1. The Police De.parttnent l1as no concerns related to tIle site design sublnitted witl1
the application.
SANITARY SERV.ICES CORP. COMMENT:
1. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your
proposal prior to tIle .public hearing. There is a concern that the required
luodifications may significantly impact your site d.esign and Inay require a revised
site plal1. If tIle site plan is revised, COl1tact the planner assi.gned to the project
ilnmediately to discuss t]le changes and .how to .proceed with the revised site plan.
2. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your
proposal and submit stanlped (approved) plans witl1 your certificate of zoning
compliance ap.plication~
<:"."."": .: i
EX.HIBIT D
OBGYN
CUP-04-053
Conditional.Use .Permit Findings
STANDARDS FOR CONDIT.IONA.L USES
The Commission and Council shaD review the particular facts and circumstances of
each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and .may approve a
conditional use permit if they shall fmd evidence presented at the hearing(s) is
adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards,
open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by
this ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject pro.perty is large el1oug.h to accommodate tIle requested
use and all other required features as noted above. As part of the .planned
developlnent, the applicant .is requesting ap.proval of .parking scenario proposed,
as follows: The staff .parking will be served by the nortll .parl(ing lot with an
approximate ratio of o.ne space per staff, with 25 spaces, nine cOlnpact with zero
lot line :parking to the north. The clinic will be served by 38 parking spaces
(which is a ratio of one space per eacll 1.5 units). The .Elnergen.cy doctor parking
will be served by 5 spaces in tIle front cross access lane.
Stal1dard ordinance parking requirelnents for "Clil1ics (lnedical, dental, optical)"
apply to the site. TIle sta.ndard is ordinance for Clinics (medical, dental, optical is
One spaces per 200 gross square feet The proposed building is 10, 339 gross
square feet, requiring 53 parking spaces. TIle ap.plicant has .proposed 68 parking
spacs in cO.1npliance witl1 the Chapter 11 Section 13 MCC~
Staff supports the proposed parking ratios, zero lot line par.king, and compact
spaces as they are based 011 the applicant's experience with similar projects in
other areas. Staff l1as concerns with the five parking spaces backing out on tIle
cross access road wbich has not been finalized. If tIle cross access road becomes
public right of way during the replatting of touc.hmark living centers subdivision,
these five parking spaces shall.be eliminated.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious ,vith the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of
this Ordinance;
The current COlnprehensive Plan Lal1d Use Ma.p designates the pro.perty as
"Mixed Use Commullity." Staff finds tllat the pro:posed. clinicl:lnedical office .uses
are harmonious with alld. in accordance with the COID.prehensive Plan. The
(.. .
...( ~
~
\.
overall project was approved as a conditional use for a .planned develo.Plnent in
order to allow reduced setbacks and multiple buildings on a single lot The current
proposal is also a planned developluent to modify the original layout and to
provide detailed approvaL If the project is approved as a Planned Development, it
will .meet tIle Ininimu.m requlrelnents of the MCC4
This proposal is in compliance witll the mixed .use policies in Chapter 7 (pp. 97-
98)4 The purpose of the mixed use designation in the Compre:hensive Plan "is to
identify key areas which are either infill in nature or situated in 11ighly visible or
transitioning areas of tIle city wllere ilIDovative and flexible d.esign O.PpOrtul1ities
are encouraged. The intent of this desigllatio.n is to offer the developer a greater
degree of design and use flexibility~" Thus staff concurs that the flexibility
requested thro.ugl1 tIle PD application is in hannony witll the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan designation and similar uses in the local vicinity.
c~ That the design, construction, operation, and mai.ntenance will be compatible
with other uses in the general neighborhood and \vith the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely
change the essential character of the same area;
Staff finds tllat the proposed medical office will not adversely change tIle existillg
(lnixed use) or intended (mixed use) character of tIle general vicinity. The
pro:posed project boundary is surrounded on three sides by other property owned
.by Touclunark for the Touchlnark Living Cellter Su.bdivision FP-02-006 project
and is in harmony with the approved conceptual plan for the project Any ilTI.pacts
of the clinic will likely be restricted to .existing a.nd future phases replatting of the
Touchluark Living Cellters project itself. The site requires a lot line adjustmel1t
between lots 1-3 in Bloc.k 2 of Touclunark Livillg Centers Subdivision. The Lot
Li.ne Adjusttnent shall be sublnitted to Public .Works p.rior to re-:plat if tl1e
applicant wislles to obtain a building pennit .prior to recordation of a re-
su.bdivision of Block 2.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed clinic will adversely affect adjacent
properties du.e to the fact that the .proposed clinic is in cOln:pliallce witll the
conceptual.plan for Meadow Lake Village project and Toucmnark Living Centers
Subdivision. Any ilnpacts of the clinic will likely be restricted to existing and
future phases of tl1e project itself. The Commissiol1 al1d Council should consider
any testilTIOny (written a.nd oral) presented at the pu.blic l1earings before making
this finding~
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities
and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, ,vater, sewer or that the person responsible for
/~..~ . . ..
\~..: .
the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide
adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development can be adequately served by the
essential public facilities and services listed above. City water & sewer Inains
have been constructed within the Meadow Lake Village project and will be
extel1ded as .part of this proposed develo.pluent. Drainage will be retained 011 site.
Trash e.nclosures have .been provided OIl-site for refuse disposaL The applicant
needs to coordinate with the Fire Department regarding the fire lanes.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the
economic \velfare of the community;
Staff finds tllat the proposed developlnent will not be detriluental to the econo:mic
welfare of the COlTIlTIUllity, nor would :it create the need for any new facilities or
services to be paid for by the public~ All required ilnprovements, including
lalldscaping, paving, parking, installation of services and roads, etc. will be paid
for by the developer. The primary public costs to serve the project will be for fire
and poli.ce services.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff fil1ds tllat no excessive traffic, smoke, fulnes, glare or odors should result
from the :proposed medical office use~
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which
shall be so d.esigned as not to create an interference with traffic on
surrounding public streets;
Stafffinds that the proposed use will not create significant interferellce with any
traffic on the surroundil1g public streets~
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, dalnaged or
destroyed by issuance of this conditional use.
(~... .
1...~
March 11, 2005 AZ 04-035
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING March 151 2005
APPLICANT Randy Worden ITEM NO. 5-C
REQUEST Findings for Approval- Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zones for Klamath Basin Subdivision - 4625 West Ustick Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATfORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SElTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See affached Findings
p
Contacted:
Emailed:
hone: 343-33g/
Materials presented at public meetings shaJl become property of the City of Meridian.
(.. ..:
(::.'.'::. .:
In the matter of a request to Annex and Zone 5.01 acres from RUT to R-4 (LOlV Density
Residential) AND Preliminary Plat approval for twelve (12) building lots and four (4) other
lots, for Klamath Basin Subdivision, by Randy Worden
Case No(s): AZ-04-035, P.P-04-045
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 1, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a pu.blic hearing was :publis.hed for two (2) co.nsecutive weeks prior to
tIle City Council public hearing, tIle first publicatiol1 appearing and written notice
.mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within tlrree hundred feet (300')
of the external .boundaries of the .property. The .notice of public hearing before the
City Council was posted upon the pro.perty under COl1sideration :more t11al1 one week
before said 11earing. All other noticing was done consistent with Ida.ho Code g67-
6509.
The lnatter was duly considered by the City Council at tIle March. 1, 2005, public
.hearillg(s). The applicant, affected property owners, and govenunent su.bdivisions
.providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridial1 were
given full opportunity to ex.press COlTIlnents and submit evidel1ce~
b. Written and oral testimony was received on tllis Inatter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for writte.n testimony) al1d in the officialtneeting rnil1utes (for
oral testitnony).
c~ The Plal1nil1g and Zonillg COlumissio:n conducted a p.u.blic heari.ng and issued. a
written recoill.mendatioll on tile subject luatter to the City COUI1Cil~
d. TIle City Cou.ncil heard and took oral and writtel1 testilTIo.ny and duly COllsidered the
evidence and the record in this Inatter.
2. Process Facts
a~ There l1as .been compliance with all notice and :hearing requirelnents set forth in
Idallo Cod.e ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~9 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by tl1e Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and .Proof of
Posting filed with. the staff report
3. Application and Property Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). AZ-04-035 / PP-04-045 - PAGE 1 Of 4
(.
(n.:.. .;..
a. In addition to the ap.plicatiol1 and pro:perty facts noted in tIle staff report and tile
Planning & Zoning Reco.mmendation for the subject ap.plication(s), it is hereby
verified that the :property owner( s) of record at the time of issuance of these
findings are Randy and Lil1nea Worden.
4. Required Fil1dings per Zo.ning and S.ubdivision Ordinal1ce
a. See Exhibits D and E for the findings req.uired for these applications.
B. ConclusiollS of Law
1. The City of Meridian sIlall exercise the po.wers conferred upon it by tIle "Local Land
Use Plannil1g Act of 1975," codified at Cllapter 65, Title 67, Ida.ho Code (I.C~ 967-
6503)~
2. The Meridian City COUI1CiI takes judicial 110tice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
:Oevelop.lnent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, al1d all
current zoning maps thereot: The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established tIle
IIll.pact Area and the Amellded COlnprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6,2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditio.ns shall be reviewa.ble by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code
9 11-1 7 -9.
4. Due consideration has beell given to the comment(s) received froIn tIle govemlnental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by tIle proposed developtuent will not
itnpose expel1se upon tIle public if tIle attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has grallted an order of approval in accordance with tllis Decision, which
sllall be signed by tIle Mayor and City Clerk al1d then a copy served by tIle Clerk upon
the applicant, the PlalUling and Zonillg Departlnent, tIle Public .W orks Departlnent and
any affected party requestil1g not.ice.
7. T.hat this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Prelitninary Plat
d.ated November 18,2004 as shown in Exllibit B, and the Site Specific and Standard
Conditiol1S in Exllibit C. The conditions are concluded to .be reaso.nable and the
ap.plicant shall :meet such requirelnents as a conditio11 of approval of tIle application.
c. .Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's aut110rity as provided in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact whicl1 are herein adopted, it is
hereby ordered that:
CrTY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A.ND DECISION & O.RDER
CAS E NO(S)> AZ~04-035 / PP-04-045 - PAGE 2 Of 4
; . .
~\ .
('. .
1. The applicant's Prelitninary Plat as evidel1ced by havil1g submitted the Preliminary
Plat dated November 18, 2004 is hereby conditionally approved; and,
2. The Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibit C.
D. Notice of Ap.plicable Time Limits
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that after the date of approval of tIle preli.lninary plat, the owner or
develo:per shall have one year within which to file tIle request for approval of tIle final
plat. After approval of final plat, the owner or developer sh.all have one year to begin
constructio.n of the public utilities and one year thereafter to cOlnplete constructiol1 of
those .public facilities. (MCC 12-2-4.B & C.)
E. Notice afFinal Action and Right to Regulatory Takil1gs Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner .may
request a regulatory ta.king analysis. Such request .must be in writing, and lnust be filed
with the City Clerk not lTIOre than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision
co.ncemillg the matter at isS"ue. A req.uest for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the
titne period within WIlich a Petition for Judicial :Review may be filed.
2~ .Please take notice tIlat this is a final action of the govemi.tlg body of tIle City of
Melidian, pursuant to Idaho Code 9 67-6521 an affected person being a .perSOll who has
an interest in real property w.hich may be adversely affected by tIle issuance or de11ial of
the conditional use permit ap.proval may within twenty-eigl1t (28) days after tIle date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provid.ed by Chapter 52, Title 67, Id.al1o
Code.
.F. Exl1ib.its
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved Preliluinary Plat (with conditiol1S)
Exhibit C: Site Specific and Standard Conditi.ons
Exhibit D: Zoning Amendtnent Findings
Ex.hibit E: Prelilninary Plat Findings
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S)> AZ-04-035 I PP-04-045 - PAGE 3 Of 4
t..:::.... ..
By action of the City Council at its regular Ineeting held on the
IJ1 ~U:It ' 2005.
I L./
156 day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHA.UN WARDLE
VOTED
CO.UNeIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
CO'UNeIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEE.RD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
MaY~J\h'Iam. ~< {d/~ ~eerd
~~~' tilt ~ w#t~
~.. :.~ ..a~' ..~. ~~~
IJ~ t)'i;~'f", ~\~
Attest: ~. ,.. ~ <:> ?~l::{
~ .
~ .
! Sl~~JiIA .~
~. . ~
~.~ . ~
~;f.j ..... ^ . . ~~1t~ ,jJ~~j
~~ '1d~lta{ ,\"r~l~r;i}
T<1:;i:1.1n~1!!f.ft~"M ~{~ f!~;~i}~ ~,~a.tt'
Co.py served upon Applicallt, TIle Plall11ing and Zoning Department, Public Warks Department
and City Attorney.
By:
City Clerk's Office
Dated: ~-l ? ~1)Cj
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). AZ-04-035 I PP-04-045 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(. ...
t~~.
(...:....
EXHIBIT A
:KIamath Basin Subdivision
AZ-04-035
Legal Description
f-.~ &1.. i\ I ...~ 1"""1 g i r1 (~ (.::~ r ~S ~ I r1 (,:' ·
~~ L> (\1 r~ ~J .~ ~} ~ ~ n t : ~ ~~ ij ~ l~. ~..... (:l~ ~ :~< ~ .;:~v _~! :.~ r ~ (:.~ ~ :.: ~-> ~..
rp. i 1 ~ :3 f ~ (0: >~ -=t- :; "".1.. ~ k f I ~ ~. ~ ~ J (.~ ~ ~.t)l :2 . :~j 7 ~ t ~~
l( 111 01 ~l{ tl IIllSI II SUI)lii,: isi 011
At. "ne'lt! tion n e~a:~ript ion
A p~j[\.:d of Ltnd Sl!t1a1e In the nurthwest quart0r of ill\: northwc~l quarh:r of Sedinn )T
ltnvnship J Norlh, Han,;c 1 \Vc~t Bnlsi; i\'lcridjan, Ada ("nunt.y" Tdaho. b-~,dng more
pJrf. iculady dc~crio(':d as. foll~ ) \\.\'..
('omnwHdug at thl" nor1 hwe;jl t:.ornef of ~uid "Stt.diuH 3. the P(HNT {)F BE(;I NN I N(;;
Iht.-nce SS9'1 Ur29'1-:. 77~t 71 kef atong [h~~ north houndar.y of said Section J tn
the non h\'~;~sl t,;u rn~r t 1 f Staten Park Suhdl vision H..."'1. recorded in Ht li.lk ~ fl .0 f Pbt ~~ {.it
Pagc~ <j713 and 97] 4. rec.llrds uf Ada County~
. rhencc Sf.U.Yl.~2':~.1 ~'\V " ;) 15, 7g kd akmg the wt:~tc.rly boundary of said Slaten
Park Suhdivbitln tt, {he southwest corm".f of said Xuhui \'J-slon in the Fi ght rvH h..
(.~.~lI1111 ~
'Ih~ncc N60!:lOS"J7~~\V~ 21.,0;1 h.:~t along saki Fight "iik., Canal~
'1 hence N52<)35"291~\V+ 119Jd ICd ~t'ong said Eight I\1ik CanaL
Thi.1nct.~ N StY']l '"3h'!\V" 2"J 1 .Og feel along said Uig.hl l\..11Ie Canal:.
Thence N(.:..:-'~5 '< 36 < -\V ~ '277 ;:~ 7 l~'ct .along ~aiJ. Light t\1 ih: Canal:
Thcnt:t: N4-&('2h "..~ 5~'\V. I :iJ, ()) feet akltll~, said Eight 1\'11 Ie ( ~anal:
l"hencC' N62'<26' ] 6 ~"\V < 58,8 l fce~ along. s.aid F.ight fv1 ile C'mliJL
.] h~no: N 7iF< 30 '09'~\V ~ 4 7 ,(l9 fe-:t along said Fight tvh lc Canal to the \Vt.:'Sh:rI)
houndary of said Sect Inn 3 ~
I"hcnce NO(Y' ..~~ "44 'T~.., 60"24 teet ah 109. the SJid \vested y o.;)undary (.If St-ctioIl ~ lD
tll~~ l)()l NT () F IJI~(~ iN N IN(~ ~
.{.be Hhov~-dc$crihtd parcel contahu 5 J} l iH:'.rcs. nlorc or k~s-
.: .: ::..: :..1~,~;~:;;:~.::i~ .~~.;~~;! t:.-...-'
(~..
:;::.
EXHIBIT B
Klamath Basin Subdivision
PP-04-045
Approved Preliminary Plat
! .
. .. ... ... .......... ...... ... .. .. ...~...........-- -.............. . ... .. .. ._,.......... ..................---.. .. ... .. .... . .. . ... . .........--. .. . . . . . . ... .... ..... . .. .
.!_~
:~~-..=~ ::'7..___... >oR IQ ::1. ~
;==:: :::~::==::u ~j.~.!
; i 1
~t....._~... .... }
_u_ -- Ir-.-....,i..l
- · .. ... : . . ~"~IIIII",:"""~ ~~I -f. Id I
=::= I! :.-;: y t~1
--- ; ~ .~ 1ft ·
==== [' 1~ I~l
~ J; ,!! I
--- J iif!
=:~in7"~-:::'-=- k~l . ;::~.':':::"-_ ~l.r'~- .:..~.
~~~~.......",-~.~. !""....~~,.,.,~ . .r ::=t:1'~~~, .
1 ~ ~"'IIIIII""" ~..... ~~ -.......... ~ - ~..
~~~-- ...--. =~_~~II~ 1:' rj .
::..:t:J"'l...-~_1o. --. t:.L __ _ _ _
I F~~~:'S\~~!Ji. --__M__ i i:
· ,&~~.... ~'""=-~.. ..,.- """"'-- .:.u..:-.:
I ._.:.:\.~"":t~=n"::=- ~
II ~~~~i ll_.~
~ ~ ~ m ...~ lE~
, ~ -~::.:~...~:-:~~: ~~:::: ~~F: l>>~
L._..... ....---..........-.... .... . ...,.. ~. ... .......-. --~---~_~., .... ..... ~~. ... ._~~-._..... .... ._____._.,,~______.._.. ..,__..~..........~~<~~~~.jr~j
~
~
~t
~H
ii -tll
I
!
J
I~
l!
;~
~
J
J
-2
~
.. l
c.
EXHIBIT C
Klamath Basin Subdivision
PP-04-045
Site Specific and Standard Conditions
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIMINARY PLAT)
1. All comlnents and conditions of the Annexation and Zoning (AZ-04-035)
application shall also be considered conditions of the Prelilninary Plat (PP-04-
045).
2. The suhlnitted preliminary :plat prepared by .8 & A Ellgineers, Inc~, labeled Sheet
1, dated 11-18-04, is approved, with the COl1ditions outlined herein. A.p.proval of
PP-04-045 shall be COlltingent u.pon the applicant obtaining a variance fro"lu the
City Council for the proposed Niemann Street cul-de-sac length.
3. Utilize a COln.mon driveway for Lots 13 and 14, Block 1 ~ The .public street
frontage for Lots 13 and. 14, Block 1, may be reduced to IS-feet, as pro:posed.
Unless otherwise approved by the Meridian Fire Department, the drive surface of
said COlTIlTIOn drive sllall be constructed a mini-mUlTI of 20-feet wide, witll crushed
gravel and aspllaltic concrete paving in accordance with Meridian City Code. In
accordance wit11 Meridian City Code, if Lot 12 an.d/or 15, Block 1, utilize said
common driveway, the driveway must be constru.cted to a tninllTIUlTI 24-feet wide,
with cruslled gravel and asphaltic concrete paving. Said cOlrunon dli.veway shall
have a Inini:mu.tn GVW of 70,000 lbs. No parking signs sllall be installed on any
portion of the COffilnon driveway that doubles as a fire lane. Any portion of the flag
for Lots 13 and 14 that are beyond tIle driveway surface shall be landscaped. A
note shall be placed all the face of the final .plat stating the purpose of the
co:mmon driveway easelne.nt alld WIlD is to be responsible for luaintenal1ce
thereof~ All COlrunoll driveways shall be straigllt or have a turning radius of 28'
inside and 48' outside~
4. Prior to signature of the final plat by tIle City :Engineer, all structures on tllis site
sIlall be removed4
5. The applicant s.halI not be required to tile the Eight Mile Lateral abutting tIle site.
In lieu of tiling tIle Eight Mile Lateral, the applical1t shall be required to install a
6-foot tall fence alol1g the back side of the lots on the southern portion of tIle
develoPlnent. Said fence s.h.all tie into the existin.g fence to the east (Staten Park
Subdivision)~ All ot]ler irrigatio.n d.itches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural
waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area
being subdivided shall be tiled per MCC 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved
by tIle appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch
owners), with written ap.proval or .non-approval submitted to the Public Works
Department If lateral users association approval can 110t be obtained, plans will
be reviewed and approved by the City Engi.neer prior to fillal plat signature~
(
(:.'.~':.:... .
6. Underground year-round pressurized inigation lnust be .provided to all lots within
this development. T.he City of Meridian requires that pressurized inigation
systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. TIle applicant shall be
req.uired to utilize any existing s.urface or well water for tIle primary so.urce. If a
surface or well source is not availa.ble, a single-point cOlmection to the culinary
water system s.hall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessmel1ts for the COlnmon
areas prior to sigl1ature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
7. The landscape plan pre.pared .by B & A En.gil1eers, Inc. is approved witll the
following changes/notes:
· Any tree over 4" in caliper that is relnoved from the property shall be
fe.placed .by installing additional trees, being the equivalent nUlnber of
caliper inclles of trees that were relnoved. Required landscaping trees will
not be considered as :replacement trees for tl10se trees tllat are :removed
(MCC 12-13-13-3). Coordil1ate a tree protection/lnitigation .plan with
Elroy Huff at the Meridiall Park Depal1mel1t
· The 25-foot wide lalldscape street buffer alol1g Ustick Road s11all be
planted with trees and Sllrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcove.r, wit11
a minimum de.nsity of one tree .per thirty-five linear feet Trees may be
grouped togetl1er. However, trees shall be spaced no closer than 80% of
the average Inature width of tIle trees (MCC 12-13-10~6 -7).
· M CC 12-13 -1 0-9 requires a 1 0- foot wi d.e gravel s110ulder abutting rig]lt-
of-way where tl1e unimproved portion of tIle rig.h.t-of-way is greater than
13 -feet (measured frOlTI the edge of pavelnent to the ed ge of sidewalk or
property lil1e), and road widenil1g is 110t in the ACHD Five Year Work
Program. Ustick Road abutting this site Ineets the warrants for the 10-foot
wide gravel shoulder requirelnent listed above. Therefore, the applicant
sllould be required to construct a 10-foot wide gravel shoulder on Ustick
Road, with tIle reluaining portion of tIle right-of-way being landscaped
with .laW!l or otller vegetative groundcover as approved by ACHD.
· RelTIOVe Note 9 regarding pathway construction..
The applicant shall make the proceeding changes/additions and submit revised
copies of the landscape plan with the sublnittal of the final plat application(s).
Other than the changes listed above, the approved laIldscape plan is not to be
altered without prior written approval of tIle Plal1ning and Zoning Department
8. A detailed fel1cing plan shall be submitted upon ap.plication of tIle fil1al plat. If
pennanent fencing is not provided around the perinleter, telnporary construction
fencing to contail1 debris lTIUst be installed prior to issual1ce of building permits.
All fences shall taper down to 3 feet lTI.aximum within 20 feet of all right-of-way.
All fencing shall be installed in accordance with MCC 12-4-10.
c.
(/n n .
9~ Maintenance of all common area lots shall .be tIle responsibility of tIle Klamath
Basin Homeowners' Association.
1 O~ Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be .via extel1sions from Staten Park
S.ubdivision~ The applicant will be responsible to construct sewer Inains to al1d
through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main
sizing and :routing with the Public W.orks Departlnent~ A.pplicant shall execute
City of Meridian standard f011TIS of easements, for any mains t11at are :required to
:provide service~ Cover over sanitary sewer :rnains shall be no less than 3-feet
fro.m finish grad.e to the top of tIle .pipe~ If cover is less than 3-feet froIu the sub-
grade to tIle top of pipe, altenlate pipe Inaterials sIlalI be .used per the Meridian
Pu.blic Works Department's Standard Specifications.
11 ~ DOluestic water service to this site sllall be via extensions fro In. Staten Park
Su.bdivision~ The ap.plicant will be responsible to construct water mains to al1d
through this proposed d.evelopme.nt Subdivision designer to coordinate Inain
sizing and routing with tIle .Pu.blic Works Departlnent. Applicant sllal1 execute
City of Meridian standard fOl1TIS of easem.ents, for any mains that are required to
provide service.
12. N.o variances, exceptiollS or reductio.l1S to the City adopted dilnensional standards
or uses are approved with tllis preliminary plat ap.plication. All minilTIU1TI lot sizes,
structure setbacks, street frontage, and 110use size requirements (IninilTIUln 1,400
square-feet) shall .be maintained~
13. Provide a 50-foot easelnent to the property to tIle south~ with tIle parcel nUlnber
S 1203223400~ for tIle future developluellt of a stub street to that south propeJ1y.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIMINA.RY PLAT)
1~ All grading of tIle site shall be perfonned in cOl1formance with MCC 11-12-3H:~
2~ Sidewalks sllall be installed witllil1 the subdivisiol1 and on the .perimeter of tIle
subdivisiol1 p.ursuan.t to MCC I 2-13-1 0-8~
3~ A letter of credit or cas]l surety in the aUlount of 110% will be required for all
fencing, lal1dscaping, .pressulized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on tIle final plat.
4. A detailed landscape and fe.ncing plan, in compliance wit11 the landscape and
subdivision ordinance and as noted in this report, shall .be submitted for the
subdivisiol1 witll the final plat application.
5~ Coordillate fire hydrant placelnel1t with the City of Meridial1 Public Works
Department
(... ....
(~~':...
6~ One-hUl1dred-watt, .high-pressure sodiulTI. streetlights will be required at locations
desigtlated .by the Public Works Departlnent All streetlights shall be installed at
su.bdivider's expense~ Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire
hydrants~ Final design locations and quantity are detel1nined after power designs
are cOlnpleted by Idaho Power Compal1Y~ The street light contractor s11all o.btain
design and pennit frOlTI the Public Works De.partlnent prior comlnel1cing
i os tallati 0 n s.
7. Any tree over 4" in caliper tl1at is removed frolD the property shall be replaced .by
installing additional trees, .being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees
tl1at were relTIoved. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as
replacelnent trees for tllose trees tIlat llave to be mitigated.
8~ SUblTIlt any up-dated groundwater/soils monitoring data, as collected . and
analyzed by a soils scie.ntist, to tIle Public Works Department for review~ Any
drail1age areas (detention/retention basil1s) must .be designed to ensure that water
will percolate or discharge witll a period of tilue not to exceed 24-.hours for all
storms up to and including a 100-year stann events. Side slo.pes within drainage
areas shall not exceed. 3: 1. AllY portio.n of a drainage area not improved with
sod/grass seed (or otller approved landscaping) shall not count towards the
required open. space area. The .project engineer sllould pay close attention to the
results of field studjes detel1uining tIle grou.ndwater, soil type & alld
characteristics during the design and construction phasesK The engitleer shall be
req.uired to certify tllat the street centerline elevations are set a lninimUlTI of 3-feet
above tIle .highest establisl1ed .ilonnal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure
tllat tIle bottOlTI elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I-foot above
groundwater.
9. The applicant shall coordillate Inailbox locatio11S wit]} tIle Meridian Post Office.
1 O~ Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems witllin this project will have to
be relnoved traIn their dOlnestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and
9-4-8~ Wells Inay be used for 11o.n-dolnestic pu~poses such as landscape irrigatiol1~
11. COlnpactio.n test results lTIUst be su.bmitted to the Meridian .Building Departlnent
for all building pads receiving engineered bac.kfill, where footing would sit atop
fill material.
12. Ap.plicant's e.tlgineer will be required to submit a signed, stalnped statelnent
certifying tllat all street finisll centerlil1e elevations are set a IniniInUlTI of three
feet above the high.est established 110nnal groundwater elevation.
13~ The applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,
and constructiol1 ins.pection fees, as dete.nnil1ed d.uring the plan review process,
prior to signature 011 the final plat per Resolutiol1 02-374.
(
I 4. Applical1t shall be responsible for application and cOlnpliance with any Section
404 Permitting that may be required by tIle A.nny C01]JS of Engineers.
15. Applicant sllall .be responsible for application and compliance with. and NPDES
Pennitting that may be required by tIle Enviromnental Protection Agency.
16. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance .provisions or tenus of the approved
almexationlconditional use does n.ot relieve the applicant of responsibility for
cOlTI.pliance.
17. Preliminary plat a.pproval shall be su.bject to tIle ex.piration .provisions set forth in
MCC 12-2-4.
AGENCY COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
]. One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per luinute
available for d.uration of 2 hours to service tIle entire project. Fire hydrants shall be
placed an. average of 500' apart. International Fire Code Appendix C.
2. Acceptance of tIle water supply for fire protection will be .by tIle Meridian Water
DepartIne.nt and water quality by the Meridian Water Departlnent for bacteria
testing.
3. Final Approval of tIle fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
a. Fire HydraJlts shall have the 4 ~" outlet face tIle main street or .parking lot
ai sl e.
b. The Fire l1ydrant sIlall .not face a street w.hich does .not have addresses on
it.
c. Fire hydrant markers sllall be provided .per Public Works spec.
d. .Locations wit}l fire hydrants sIlaII have the curb painted red 10' to each
side of the 11ydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed 011 C0111ers when spacing permits.
f. Fire l1ydrants shall not have any vel1ical obstructi.olls to o.utlets witllin 1. 0'.
g. Fire l1ydral1ts shall be placed 18" above finisll grade.
4~ Operational fire 11ydrants and telnporary or pennanent street signs are required
before cOlnbustible construction begins.
5. .Wllere a portion of the facility or building .hereafter constructed or llloved into or
within the jurisdiction is lTIOre tllan 400 feet (122 In) from a l1ydrant on a fire
apparatus access road, as Ineasured by all approved route around the exterior of the
facility or building, on-site fire hydratlts and mains s11all.be provided wllere required
.by the code official. For .buildillgS equipped tlrro.u.gllout with an approved automatic
sprinkler systelTI il1stalled in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183)~
. .
\. .
/~<~~.~
C. .
a. For Group R-3 and Gro.up U occupancies, the distance requirelnent s11all be
600 feet (183 m).
b. For buildings equipped throughout with all ap.proved automatic sprinkler
system installed in accordance wit}1 Section 903.3.1 ~ 1 or 903.3.1 ~2, the
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 In).
6. All po.rtions of the buildings located on tIlis project must be withil1 150' of a paved
surface as measured around the perimeter of the .building.
7 · All COlnmon dliveways shall be straight or 11ave a turning radius of 28' inside and
48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. Said. CQ.mmon
driveway shall have a minimulTI GVW of 70,000 lbs. N.o parking signs sIlaII be
installed on allY common driveway that doubles as a fire lane. Coordinate the
location of tIle required sigtlage with the Meridial1 Fire Departlnent.
MERIDIAN PARKS :OEP ARTMENT
1 ~ Standard for Mitigation of trees: The stalldard established in the City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinao.ce will be followed.
2. Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees d.uring Construction: The stalld.ard
established in tIle City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance will .be followed.
SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY
1. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed reVIew of your
proposal.
2. sse willll0t provide trasll pick-up services utilizing the COlnmon driveway_ The
developer shall it1stall a concrete pad at tIle end of the caffiInon drive no luore
than five (5) feet be.hind tIle sid.ewalk. The pad. sllall.be of sufficient area to
aCCOlnlTIodate tile rece.ptacles of the residences tllat take access fr01TI tIle C01TIlTIOn
driveway.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. TIle applicant shall do one of tIle following abutting the site on Ustic:k Road:
a. Dedicate .by donation an additional 23-feet of .right-of-way along Ustick Road,
an.d construct a IninimU1TI 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road,
located a rniniln.uln of 41-feet froIn the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additiol1al rigllt-of-way, but COl1struct a rninimulll 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road, located a Ininim.u.m of 41-feet from the
centerlil1e of tIle rig.ht-of-way, in an easelnent provided to the District.
(
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, .b.ut construct a .minimulu 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk along .U sticl( Road, located at the back edge of the existing
rigllt-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adj"ustlnents to properly accommodate
existing drainage and utilities.
2. Dedicate by donation a total of 60-feet of right-of-way from the centerline along
Black Cat Road.
3. Extend the stub street, Nielnann Street, from the east pro.perty line into the site, as
.proposed.
4. Construct Niemann Street within the site as a 36-foot street section with rolled
curb, gutter, and 5-foot COllcrete sidewalks witl1in 50-feet of right-of-way.
5. .Direct access to Ustick Road and Blacl( Cat Road is .prohibited and shall be noted
on the final plat.
6. Comply with all Stalldard. Conditions of Ap.provaL
Standard Conditions of Approval
1 ~ Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of tIle right-of-way~
2~ All .utility relocation costs associated with ilnproving street frontages abutting tIle
site shall be borne by the developer.
3. .Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that Inay .be
dalnaged during the constructioll of the proposed developlnellt Contact
Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file nu.m.ber) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavelnent less than five years old are 110t allowed unless
approved in writillg by tIle District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at
387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and co.nstru.ctioll sllall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway
District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplelnents,
Constluctio.n Services procedures and all ap.plicable ACHD Ordinances unless
specifically waived herejn~ An engineer registered in tIle State of Idallo shall
prepare and cel1ify all im.proveln.ent plans~
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of
building .pertuit (or other required pennits), Wl1ich inco~porates any required
design changes.
7. Construction, use al1d property development shall be ill confonnance witl1 all
applicable requirelnents of tIle Ada County Higllway District prior to District
approval for occu:pancy.
(:.
5~.
t,..:..
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to buildillg construction
in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District
Road Ilnpact Fee Ordinance~
9. It is the respo.nsibility of tIle applicant to verify all existil1g utilities within tIle
right-of-way. T.he applica.nt at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities
dalnaged by the applicatlt. TIle applicant s11811 be required. to cal1 DIG.LINE (1-
800-342-1585) at least two full business days Plior to .breaking ground within
ACHD right-of-way~ T.he ap.plicant sIlall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-
6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled.) are cOlnpro.mised during
allY .pllase of construction.
1 O~ No change in the tenns and conditions of this approval sIlaIl be valid unless they
are in writing alld signed by the applicant or th.e applicant's authorized
represe.ntative and an authorized represelltative ofth.e Ada County .Highway
District. The burden s.halI be upon th.e ap.plicant to obtain written continuation of
any change from the Ada Co.unty Higllway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of tIle pro.perty w.hich is the
subject ofth.is application, shall require t]le applica11t to cOlnply with all rules,
regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at
tIle tiIn.e tIle applicant or :its successors in interest advises th.e Highway .District of
its intent to change the :plalll1ed use of the subject prope.rty unless a
waiver/variance of said requiremel1ts or otller legal relief is granted pursuant to
the law in effect at the time tIle change in use is sought.
NAMPA & M:ERIDIAN .IRRIGATION DISTRICT
1. Natupa & Meridiall Irrigatiol1 Distlict requires tllat a Land .Use Change
Application be filed, for review, prior to fi.nal plattil1g. Please co.ntact Donna
Moore at 466-7861 for further inforlnatiol1.
2. All laterals and waste ways lTIUst be protected.
3. TIle .District's 8-Mile Lateral courses alo.ng the soUtll bo.undary of t11is
proposed project. T.his easelnel1t lTI.Ust .be protected and anyel1croaclunel1t
without a sigt1ed License Agreelnel1t and approved plan, before any
construction is started, is ul1acceptable.
4. AlllTIunicipal surface drainage must be retained 011 site. If any lTIunicipal
sUlface drainage leaves tIle site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
Inust review drainage pla.ns.
5. The develo.per lnust cOlnply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recolumended that
irrigation water be made available to all develo.p.luents witllin the Nampa &
.Meridian Irrigation District
(~:: .....
EXHIBIT D
Klamath Basin Subdivision
AZ-04-035
Zoning Amendment Findings
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning
Amendlnents, both the P&Z COffilnissiol1 and Council are required "to review the
particular facts and circumstances of eac.h proposed zoning amendment in tenns of tIle
following standards al1d shall find adequate evidel1ce answering tIle following questions
about the proposed zoning amendlnent"
TIle follo.wing is the list of standards found ill 11-15-11 and analysis by City Co.unci.l:
A~ Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance lvith the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, .has there been an application for a
Compre.hensive Plan amendment;
City Council finds that tIle proposed zonillg designation, R-4, is hallTIOnious witll
and in accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use .Map,
which designates the lan.d to be Low Density :Residential. Residential densities of
three dwelling u.nits or less per acre are allowed per tIle COlTI.prehensive Plan; the
proposed gross deJlsity of KlalTI.atll Basin Subdivision is 2~63 dwelling units per
acre. 111 additiol1, in the applicant's cover letter several Comprehensive Plan
.policies are listed, Wllich s.up.port the annexatio.n and proposed residential use of
the property.
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment .intended to be rezoned in the
future;
City Council does not a11ticipate that tIle applicallt intends to rezone the subject
property in tIle future.
c~ Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that \vould be allowed under the ne\v zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
City Co.uncil finds tl1at sin.gle-family residential uses are allowed within the
requested zoning district of R~4~ T.he accolnpanying plat demonstrates tIle land
will .be developed witll lot sizes, housil1g types and other dilnensional
requiremel1ts that co.nfOl1TI to tIle proposed zo.ning designation~ NOTE: The
ap.plical1t will need to obtain variance approval froln the City Council because tIle
proposed plat includes a dead-end street that exceeds the rnaXilTIUlTI cul-de-sac
lengtl1 established by code~
t:
("
/:.........
(
\.....
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, nelV
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
City Council finds tllat .properties to the east and northwest have recently been
approved for development similar to the .proposed subdivision~ Staten Park
Subdivision to the east and Birchstone CreeI( S.u.bdivision to the northwest are
botll single-fatuity develop.ments with residential densities silnilar to the .proposed
plat Except for the large RUT .parcel across Ustick Road and four small parcels
directly SOUtll of the subject parcel, the entire section has already been annexed
into the Meridia11 City limits~ This is one of the last parcels designated ':Low
Density Residential' on the .Future Land Use Map that has not been almexed and
approved for developluent 111 Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West
T.he arterial streets abutting tllis site, Ustick Road and Black Cat Road are
currently not included witllin ACHD's Five Year Work :P ro gram. for roadway
im:provelnents.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use \vilI not change the
essential character of the same area;
The existing c11aracter of the area will, and is, cUITel1tly c.hanging, especially.upon
build-out of the pro.posed project and other similar subdivisions in tIle general
vic.inity~ City Council finds tllat the proposed R-4 zoning and subsequent single-
fatuily residential uses proposed ill tIle prelilninary .plat are consistel1t with the
intended cllaracter of the vicinity, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. City
Co.uncil also finds that the proposed ZOlling/uses call .be designed and constructed
in a Inanner that wi]] be harmonious witll and. appropriate in appearance wit11 tIle
existing and intended. character of the surroullding area~ Although there will be an
ilnpact of the subject developluent on the existing cl1aracter of the area~ City
COUI1Cil finds t11at the iITI.pact is consistellt with tIle illtended cllaracter of tIle area;
a luix of low and InediulTI density residential.
F. Will the .proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
City Council does not anticipate that tIle pro.posed residelltial uses will be
hazardous as long as the cO.llditio.os o.utlined in this report are complied witl1 and
construction traffic al1d house construction is COl1ducted ill a manner consiste11t
with City Code~
j"
\'.... ... .
(.:..... .. .
G. Will the area be served adequate.ly by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, poUce and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
The ap:plicant will be responsible for tIle extension of utilities to al1d througl1 this
proposed develo.pluent Sizing and routing shall be coordinated with the Public
Works :Oepartment.
The applicant and/or future pro:perty owners will be required to .pay park and
highway impact fees.
On January 25,2005, ACHD approved this development with site-specific and
standard co.nditions. Please review the ACHD report for additional infonnatio11
regarding tllis finding.
On January 14, 2005, a joint agency/department COlTIlnents meeting was held with
representatives of key service providers to this property~ Based on the joint
agen.cy/departlnent meeting and other COlTIl11ents received frOlTI
agencies/departments, City Council finds that th.e :public services listed above can
be luade available to aCCOlTIlTIodate the proposed develo.pment.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
If approved, the developer will be financing the extel1sion of sewer, water, local
street infrastructure, utilities and irrigation services to serve tIle project. TIle
primary public costs to serve the future resid.ents will be fire, police and school
facilities al1d services. City COUI1Cil finds there will not be excessive additional
requirements at .public cost and that tIle proposed zoning and subsequel1t
developlnellt will 110t be detritnental to the cOlrununity's eco.nolnic welfare~
I. Will the pro.posed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that lviII be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
City Council finds that tIle pro.posed anllexation alld tile development of single-
falniIy homes on this site will not in.valve uses that will create nuisances that
would be detrilnel1tal to the general welfare of the surround.ing area.
ACH:D projects this develoPluent will ge.nerate 11 0 additio.nal vel1icle trips per
day. City Council recognizes the fact tllat traffic and noise will illcrease witll the
ap.provaI of this .subdivision; .however, City Cou.ncil does not .believe tllat tIle
(
,;C:c......: .
c..
~<.~.: .". :
alTIOunt generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. City
Council does not anticipate the proposed annexation and subsequent uses will
create excessive traffic (see finding HJ" below), noise, slTIoke, nnnes, glare, or
odors.
J. Will the area have vehi.cular approaches to the property \vhich shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on sur.rounding public
streets;
The applicant is proposing to extend tIle existing public stub street (NiemalU1
Street) to tIle east, as the only vehicular access into the site. ACHD is requiring
Nielnalll1 Street to be extended as .proposed.. No otller access to Ustick :Road or
Black Cat Road has been approved by ACHD with the subject ap.plication.
T.he extension ofNielnarul Street will cause traffic volumes on th.e existing streets
in Staten Park Subdivision to increase. .However, if the extension of Niemann
Street is constructed as approved by ACHD, City Council does not believe that
the subdivision will create i.nterferel1ce witll traffic on tIle sUITounding public
streets.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
There are severallnature trees on tllis property~ Any existin.g trees larger thall 4"
caliper tl1at are removed should be Initigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. If
the OIl-site trees are protected and Initigated for, as required by the Meridian Parks
DepartInent, City Cou.ncil finds t11at the proposed developtnent will not result in
tile destruction, loss or damage of any .llatural feature(s) of Inajor im.portance.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
M:eridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
City Council finds t]lat all esse.ntial services are available or will be provided by
tIle developer to the subject property and will 110t require unreasonable
expenditure of public funds. The applicant is pro.posing to develop the lalld in
substantial cOlnpliance with the City's Comprellellsive Plan (low density
residential). Lands to the east, west and northwest of the subject pro.perty have
already .been ~pproved for ann.exation and development and tl1is is a logical
expansion of tIle City lilnits. In accordance with the findil1gs listed above, City
Council finds that the annexation/zoning of tllis property would be in the best
il1terest of the City.
( ..
i...:..
(
EXHIBIT E
Klamath .Basin Subdivision
PP-04-045
Preliminary Plat Findings
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 0 read as follows: "In determinil1g the acceptance of a
proposed subdivision, the ComluissionlCoul1cil sllall COllsider the objectives of this title
alld. at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Co.mprehensive Development
Plan;
City Council finds that the proposed application is in substantial compliance with
the adopted Future Land Use Map of the Co.mprel1ensive Plan (Chapter VII)~ The
proposed density, 2~63 dwelling units per acre (gross), 3.39 dwelling units per
acre (net) is in cOlnpliance witl1 the land use classification, low density residelltial,
noted on the map~
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
City Council fi.nds that p.ublic services are available to accolTI.1TIodate the proposed
develoPluent (See finding "G" under Al111exation al1d Zoning Al1alysis for lTIOre
d.etaiL)
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Because the developer is il1stalling sewer, water, al1d utilities for t11e developluent
at their cost, City Council finds that tIle subdivisioll will not require the
expenditure of capital ilnprovelne.nt funds.
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
See finding "G" under Annexation and Zoning Al1alysis above, and tIle Agency
COlnmellts al1d Conditions at the end of tllis report for more detail.
E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to
the Commission's attentioR.a
City Council is not aware of any health, safety or el1vironmental problelTIS
associated with tIle develo.ptnent of tllis subdivision that should be brought to the
Councilor Commission's attention. ACHD COllsiders road safety issues in their
analysis; ACH.O has ap.proved tllis subdivision, witll COl1ditions.
\,:,::...
March 11, 2005
P P 04-045
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15, 2005
APPLICANT Randy Worden ITEM NO_ 5-D
REQUEST Findings for Approval- Request for PreliminoJ)' Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other lots on 4.56 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for Klamath Basin
Subdivision - 4625 West Ustick Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SElTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See attached findings
(}v
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: 3 J 0 Phone:
~ CO Staff Initials: 1.R
... ........
Materials presented at public mee"ngs shall become property of the City of MeridIan.
(
(..~. :
. .
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
D.ECISION & ORDER
In the matter of a request to Annex and Zone 5.01 acres from R.UT to R-4 (LOlV Density
Residential) AND Preliminary Plat approval for twelve (12) building lots and four (4) other
lots, for .Klamath Basin Subdivision, by Randy Worden
Case No(s): AZ-04-035, PP-04-045
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 1, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing .Facts
a. A notice of a public .hearil1g was published for two (2) cOl1secutive weeks prior to
the City Council pu.bIie hearing, the first .publication appearing and written notice
Inailed to property owners or purchasers of record witl1in three hundred feet (300')
of tIle external boundaries of the property~ The notice of public .hearillg before tIle
City Council was posted upon the property under co.nsideration lTIOre tllan one week
before said hearing. All other noticing was do.ne consistent with Idaho Code ~67-
6509 .
The Inatter was duly considered by the City Council at the March 1, 2005, public
hearing(s)~ The ~pplicant, affected property owners, and govemlnent su.bdivisions
providing services within the plannil1gjurisdiction of the City of:Meridian were
given full op.portunity to express COIUJnellts and submit evidence.
.b~ Written and oral testilnony was received on this Inatter, as reflected in the records
of tIle City Clerk (for written testilTIOny) and ill the officiallneetil1g Ininutes (for
oral testilnol1Y)~
c~ TIle PlalUling and Zon.illg Co.mlnission co.nducted a pu.blic hearing al1d issued a
written recomluendation on the su.bject Inatter to the City CounciL
d. The City Co.unciI11eard. al1d took oral and written testimollY and duly considered tIle
evidence and the record in this matter.
2. Process Facts
a~ There has been com.pliance with all notice al1d Ilearing requirelnents set fo.rth ill
Idaho Code ~67 -6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code 9 ~ 11-15-5 and I 1-1.7 -5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailil1g, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report
3. A.pplicatiol1 and Property Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIO.NS OF LA W AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-035 / PP-04-045 - PAGE I Of 4
(.
(/...
a~ In addition to the application and pro.perty facts noted in the staff report and the
Planning & Zoning Recolnmendation for the subject application(s), .it is hereby
verified that the property owner( s) of record at the time of issuance of these
findings are Randy alld Linnea Worden.
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a~ See Exhibits D and E for the findings required for tllese applications.
B. Conclusions of Law
1. TIle City of Meridian sllaII exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Cllapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. ~67-
6503).
2. The Meridial1 City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision al1d
Developtnent Ordinances codified at Titles II and 12, Meridian City Code, a11d all
current zoning maps thereot: The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established tIle
Ilnpact Area and the Alnended COlnpre.hensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. T.he conditions sIlall be reviewable by the City COU11Cil pursuant to Meridian City Cod.e
S 11-17 -9.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received frOlTI the governlne.lltal
su.bdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planllil1gjurisdiction.
5. It is fo.uod public facilities and services required by the pro.posed developtne.nt will not
ilnpose expense upon tIle pu.blic if the attaclled conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City lIas granted an order of approval ill accordance wit]} this Decisioll, whic.h
shall be signed .by the Mayor and City Clerk al1d t]len a copy served .by tIle Clerk upon
tIle applicant, the Planning atld Zo.ning Department, the Pu.blic W o.rks Department and
any affected .party requesting notice.
7. Tllat tllis approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Prelilninary Plat
dated Novelnber 18, 2004 as shown ill Exhibit .8, and the Site Specific and Standard
Conditions in. Exhibit c~ T.he C011ditions are co.ncluded to be reasonable and tIle
applicant shall meet such requiremel1ts as a condition of approval of the applicatiol1.
c. Decisio.n and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in .Meridiall City Code ~ 12-3-5 and
based upon tIle above and foregoillg Findings of Fact whicl1 are herein adopted, it is
hereby ordered tllat:
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-035 / PP-04-045 - PAGE 2 Of 4
c
/~~...:......
(...
1.. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced .by having submitted the Preliminary
Plat dated Nove.mber 18, 2004 is l1ereby conditionally approved; and,
2. TIle Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibit C.
D. N.otice of Applica.ble Time Limits
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Prelilninary Plat Duration
Please take ll.otice that after the date of ap:proval of tIle preli1uinary plat, tIle OWller or
developer shall have one year witllin which to file the request for ap.proval of the fil1al
plat. After approval affinal plat, the OWl1er or developer shall have one year to begi.n
construction of the public utilities and o:ne year thereafter to complete construction of
those public facilities. (MCC 12-2-4.B & C~)
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takit1gs Analysis
1. TIle Applicant is hereby notified tllat pursuant to Idal10 Code 67-8003, tIle Owner Inay
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request In.ust be ill writing, al1d must be filed
with the City Clerk not lTIOre than twenty-eigllt (28) days after the final decision
concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings al1alysis will toll th.e
tilDe period witllin Wllich a :Petitio.n for Judicial Review lnay.be filedK
2~ Please take notice that this is a final action of tIle governing .body of tIle City of
Meridian, pursua.nt to Idallo Code S 67-6521 all affected perso.l1 being a person who has
an interest ill real property Wllich. Inay be adversely affected by tile issuance or d.enial of
the conditional use permit ap.proval may witl1in twel1ty-eig11t (28) days after the date of
this decisio.n and ord.er see.k a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
F. .Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal Descri.ption
Exhibit B: Approved Preliminary Plat (with conditions)
Exhibit C: Site Specific and Standard Conditions
Exhibit D: Zoning Alnendlnel1t Findings
Exhibit E: Preliminary Plat Findings
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS), AZ-04-035 / PP-04-045 - PAGE 3 Of 4
("
"-::.~
By action of the City Council at its regular Ineeting held on the
/Tl Mof- ' 2005~
(5f~ day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBE:R CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL .MEMBER CHARLIE :ROUNT.REE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
tL
MA YOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
~
VOTED
Attest:
and City Attorney.
By: , .
CIty Clerk's Office
~
Dated: 3~lg- -OS
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S), AZ-04-035 / PP~04-045 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(.........
\.... .
{'J.... .
~.
EXHIBIT A
Klamath Basin Subdivision
AZ-04-035
Legal Description
I}- (1.. /\ I ~ ..) (.:+ I" . .1 .). (:. \. I- ... I f ~ ~
.., <--"\!. r .'.. I t~ I <.... ... .' ,~~ 1 ~ 1 C '
~~. ;:: /~l ~~ ~\!.. \[;~;. ~ !1 t : ~ t~ \ ~ \ ~ '. \:~ /~' ~ ~~~:.~ .'~~ ~!I r ~ {'.J ~;' ~.: ~:-, ,.,
I ~ 11. 2 ( , ~N; .~J 4r : ~ ..t. ~ ~~ f 1": ~ ~ ~\ J (~S ~. ~ :.l::: ~N:t 7 ~ l j
1\.1~1 Ula (11 II~lsi il SUIJll 1\: isitJl1
A nflCX~~ t itlll I) csc rillt iiJ II
A paft:(: 1 ~)f bnd sit Hale in tht.: nurt.lnn:sl q uarkr of ihe n~ }rth\\.~s.t quaJ1.~~r of St~ction .~ <
lo\.vnship ~ North-. Hangc ] \\\..~-"iL B~)he I\h:ridian, Ada County. J d:.Jll0, b\.~ing Dlnr.e
parI ie.ulady dc~crih.ed as. f()Hnv;~
<..'( nnn k'ndJ 19 at tht:" ullrl hwe~l l'.onk'r 01" ~~aid St~\.~\ Jun J.. the P()f N' r <YF nE(;1 NN IN! ~ ~
Tht.:m.T Sgq.< 1 0> 29"1':. 77ft 71 f~cl along th~~ l1llfth houndary or saki Sl:{.:ti,pn 3 h~
the northv;~st corner nfStatcn Park Subdlvisiun ~l.\ recorded in Hook X6 of Pbts ut
Pages. 9711 and 97] 4.. rcct..lrds. of /\da (\}unty ~
Thence SOOc'J2." j r'\V ~ .~d 5, 7ft. f{..'ct along the westerly houndary or saiJ Slaten
Park SubJivbion to the ~ou~hwt:'~t (orner 'Of :.;aitJ Subdi vbion in the fj~!.ht r\'1 ik
( ~ ~l rl ~.ll.~
. l"hl:llL;C N6(f)OS ".J T' \V"! 12 J)-l k~~L along ~aid Fight h.1 ik~ (" 'anal ~
TIH:ncc N 52<)3 5 ~29'!1\V. 1 l f) Jd feet aiong ~;aid Fight. 1\1 iie CanaL
ThcnCl~ N )lY'2 ! · 36"\V. 23l .Og k~l'L along said Eigh1 1\--1 i k CanaL
Tht~lltY N()~'.'5:) ~ :,(l ,..\V ~ "277}; 7 kd alnng ~~aid l:".ighl iv1 i Ie C~inaL
.1 h('th'~ N4R('26 ~ .,) !"\V > I ~ ~ .t)~ fect aluntt, saId Eighll\1ik~ ( 'anaL
rhe-flU: N62<.'<26' 16"'\V. 58JO kl~~ along ~ald Fight t\.1ik~ CanaL
.1 hen!':.!; N 7X':}3-0 .09'~\V < 4. Tfl9 rl.,.,,-~t aiong said Fight tvh Ie ( 'anal fl.l the \\\.:sh:d ~
boundary of said Sectlon ) ~
. thence NOO'."3.~' 44 '~E. 60.24 red a1nng the ~atJ wc~tcdy h~)uJldttry of St:ctinn 3 tp
tile 1)()INT 0 ~~ l~f~~(.~ INN IN(;&
.l"he uht lVeHde:scrih~J parcel r..;ont.dl!ls 5.0 1 atn..~~. mun: or h:~s.
.. ..' ;. ...j~~~~~~ ;;~; ::..~:; i2- ......~
/\:~"
f:. .
\.: .
EXHIBIT B
Klamath Basin Subdivision
P.P-04-045
Approved Preliminary Plat
. .-.....,..... .. ... . . . .. ... ..... ......... . . ... ............-..--r.....-r-.I'.. .. . . ... ...... --.-. _ . . -. . .. -..... . . . . . .. .... __ . .. . . . . . . . ... . I. . ..
~
lr- wu. ~
1 Ii
~'ll~
..... -:-0- +-r. .........--. .... "'IIIt:I: ~
. '.' .'. ~ """"--.-.'. ~.... ~ .-will .-..: __ IIIItIi
... .... --... ............... ~. It' ... ~ .-.r.I ....
~ ~... ~ tIItIIIVIIf' ~ IIChI.J
~$-
I
~
J
;~
~
I~
f
J. = ~':~
S:..s~;;.a~~~
" "".....,............ ~ .........,.. III ~ ~
... t ....... .......... ~ ~.-.- ".. ....-....:
III .. ..--... .. ........... II -Ii ~ ... ~
.:...,; ..... ~ .. .................. ill ~ ........ ......
=~r-~~"'"t~:.~
~ -=- ~..;;:::.,~ ............
~ ~..~..t:\ -: c-:::..:::
i
t Iii
i '~ 7- ~ ~ ;
IJ: ~ .~ U'
E ~ ,:1
L~ 1 ~;
~ ;.t;; r't
, : I~ t
1(... ..... ~._~
I,f~-.~
~ ~
~ t:.
i i j :
II ~ i
I~
!~~~
. ..~,~_. ... . .._~-_. -. .... . . . . ........ ~~_ _..... ... . . ... . _... . . ....... ._..~_. _. ~~~~~~~:Jf-- 1 ... j
j ..
J
.11:"
11'_~.,.,~~
.......... ~"IIL:IIII
~ iIIIII'IIe .w ........... iI
~~~~
IIIII'IIIII ~ ....
1tIwNt .......-......
~ ,,=-'Y ...
=- = t: :~~ IIlAIIII::
~=.::r~~ ~
~1I:M~Mt...~
~ ~ IitIF
.,......... .......... - .. iIIII ~
.......... ,....., 11(II..[ """':aiII' .. ~
11\.1IIII ~ IIIIII..IIII
S--J! :""t
::...~ ~- -... .......... ...... .. W' ~
:..: ~.... ..... ......... ......... 111 :III. ............:11I I-
~~ ~
~
~~~~E.:.r;:~~:::.
~~~~~t
rLf":;-~~F=~~l:::;~~
~~~1'i~~~irE;:;;:~
~.:~,~,:.:::~:,.. .....-:::r't"lw.::...
(1__
.......~w : .:.It .
~-: Zl
*~ ,~
('. .
~~~
EXHIBIT C
Klamath Basin Subdivision
PP-04-045
Site Specific and Standard Conditions
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIMINARY PLAT)
1. All comments ftIld conditions of the Annexation alld Zoning (AZ-04-035)
application s11all also be considered conditions of tIle Preliluinary Plat (PP-04-
045).
2. The sublnitted preliminary plat prepared by B & A Engineers, Inc~, labeled Slleet
1, dated 1] -18-04, is approved, with the conditions outlilled l1erein. Approval of
PP-04-045 shall be contingellt UpOl1 the applicant obtaining a variance from tIle
City Council for the proposed Nielnann Street cul-de-sac length.
3. Utilize a COlllmon driveway for Lots 13 and 14, Block I. The public street
frontage for Lots 13 and. 14, Block 1, Inay be reduced to I5-feet, as .proposed.
Unless otherwise approved by tIle Meridian Fire .Departme11t, the drive surface of
said CO.1nmon dlive sllall be constructed a minimuln of 20-feet wide, with crushed
gravel and asphaltic concrete paving in accordance wit11 Meridian City Code. In
accordance with Meridian City Code, if Lot 12 and/or 15, Block 1, utilize said
COlnmon driveway, the dliveway luust be constructed to a minimum 24-feet wide,
wit11 crushed gravel and asp.haltic co.ncrete paving. Said cO.lTI1TIon driveway sllall
have a minimulll GVW of 70,000 Ibs. No .parkillg SigtlS shall be installed on any
portion of tile common dri veway tllat do.uhles as a fire lane. Any portioll of the flag
for Lots 13 al1d 14 tllat are beyol1d the driveway surface shall be landscalJed. A
note sllall be placed on the face of tIle fil1al plat stating tIle purpose of tIle
COIUlno.u driveway easement and WIlD is to be res.pollsible for Inail1tenance
thereof~ All COilllno.n driveways sllaII be straigllt or have a tUlning radius of 28'
inside and 48' outside~
4. Prior to signature of the final plat by tIle City El1gineer, all structures on tl1is site
s11al1 be removed~
5A The applicant sIlal! not be required to tile the Eigllt Mile Lateral abutting tIle site~
In lieu of tilil1g the Eight Mile Lateral, the applicant sIlal] be required to install a
6-foot tall fence alol1g the back side of the lots on the south.em portion of tIle
deveIoplne.nt. Said fence shall tie into the existing fence to the east (Staten Park
Subdivision). All otller in-igation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natura"!
waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguo.us to the area
being subdivided sllall be tiled per MCC 12~4-13. Plans willlleed to be approved
by the appropriate irrigation/drail1age district, or lateral users association (ditch
owners), wit11 written approval or non-ap.proval subluitted to the Public Works
Department. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, plans will
be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat signature~
(....
~(. ...... : :
6~ U:nderground year-round pressurized irrigation lTIUst be provided to all lots witllin
this developlnent~ The City of Meridian requires that .pressurized irrigation
systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant shall be
required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a
surface or well source is not available, a single-point cOlU1ectiOll to tIle culinary
water systel11 shall be required. If a single-poillt comlection is utilized, the
developer shall be res.ponsible for the paytnent of assessments for the COllllTIOn
areas prior to signature 011 the final plat by the City Ellgineer~
7. The landscape plan prepared by B & A Engineers, Inc. is approved with the
following cllanges/notes:
· Any tree over 4" in caliper that is relnoved froln the property shall be
replaced by installing additional trees, being tl1e equivalent number of
caliper inches of trees that were relTIoved. Required landscaping trees will
110t be considered as replacement trees for t]lose trees tllat are relTIoved
(M CC 12-13 -13 - 3). Coordinate a tree protection/tni tigation plan with
Elroy .Huff at the Meridian Park Department
· The 25-foot wide landscape street buffer along Ustick Road shall be
planted witl1 trees al1d. shrubs, lawll, or other vegetative gro.undcover, with
a IninilTI.ulTI density of one tree per thitiy-five linear feet. Trees Inay be
grouped together~ However, trees s11a11 be s.paced no closer than 80% of
tIle average Inature widt11 of the trees (MCC 12-13-1 0-6 - 7).
· M CC 12-13 -1 0-9 req.uires a 1 0- foot wide gravel s]loulder abutting rigIlt-
of-way wllere the unimproved portion of tIle rigl1t-of-way is greater tllan
I3-feet (lneasured fi.oIn the edge of pavelnent to the edge of sidewalk or
property line), and road widening is not in t11e ACHD Five Year Work
Progral11. Ustick Road abutti.l1g tllis site lueets tIle warrants for tIle lO-foot
wide gravel s.houlder requirelnent listed above~ Tllerefore, the applicant
should be required to COl1struct a 1 0- foot wide gravel s110ulder 011 U sticl<
Road, with tIle relnaining portion of tIle right-of-way beillg lal1dscaped
witl1law.ll or ot]ler vegetative groundcover as a.pproved by ACHD.
· Remove Note 9 regarding pathway construction~
TIle applicant sllall mal(e the proceeding cllanges/additio11S and sublnit revised
copies of tIle landscape .plall wit11 tIle subtnittal of tIle final plat application(s)~
Other than the changes listed above, tIle approved landsc~pe plan is not to be
altered witll0Ut prior written ap.proval of the Planning al1d Zoning Depalin1ent.
8. A detailed fencing plal1 shall be subruitted u.pon application of the fillal plat. If
permanent fencing is not provided around the perimeter, tel11porary COllstruction
fencillg to contain. debris luust be installed .prior to issuance of building permits.
All fe11ces shall taper down to 3 feet Inaximuln within 20 feet of all rigllt-of-way~
All fencil1g shall be installed in accordal1ce witll MCC 12-4-1 O.
(" . .. .
(...... ..
\":~"" :""
9 A Maintenance of all COffilnon area lots shall be the responsibility of tIle I(lamath
Basin Homeowners' Association.
10. Sanitary sewer service to this site sllall be via extensions from Staten Park
Subdivision. The applicant will be responsible to construct sewer Inail1s to al1d
through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate lnain
sizing and routing with the Public Works Departlnent. Applicant shall execute
City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains t11at are required to
provide service. Cover over sanitary sewer lnains sIlall be no less than 3-feet
fraIn finish grade to the top of the pipe. If cover is less than 3-feet froIn the sub-
grade to the top of .pipe, alternate pipe lnaterials shall .be used per the Meridian
Public Works Depal1ment's Standard Specifications.
I 1. DOlnestic water service to tllis site sIlaII be via extensiOl1s froIn Staten Park
Subdivisio:n. The applicallt will be responsible to construct water mains to and
tlu.o.ugh tllis proposed development. Subdivisio.n designer to coordinate main
sizillg and routillg wit}l the Public Works Depalilnent Applicant s.hall execute
City of .Meridian standard fOlms of easelnents, for any mains that are required to
provide service.
12. No variances, exceptions or reductions to tIle City ado.pted dimensional standards
or uses are approved with tl1is .prelilninary plat application. All millitnUlTI lot sizes,
structure setbacks, street frontage, and 110use size requirements (luinimulu 1,400
square-feet) sllaII be maintained.
13 ~ Provide a 50- foot easelnent to tIle property to tIle soutll.. witll the parcel nUluber
S 1203223400.. for the future developruellt of a stub street to tllat south property.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIMINARY PLAT)
1. All grading of the site sIlall be perfo.nned in cOl1fonna11ce with MCC 11-12-3HA
2. Sidewalks shall be il1stalled withill the subdivision alld on the pelilneter of the
subdivisiol1 pursuant to MCC 12-13-1 0-8.
3. A letter of credit or casll surety in tIle alTIOunt of 110% will be required for all
fencing, lalldscapil1g, pressurized ilTigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on tIle fil1al plat.
4~ A detailed landscape alld fencing plan, in cOlnpliance with the landscape and
subdivision ordinal1ce and as noted ill this report, shall .be su.bmitted for tIle
subdivision witll the final.plat application.
5. Coordinate fire hydrant placelnent with the City of Meridian Public Works
Department.
t, ..
('.'.'...
~.::~~.~ .
6. One-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodiulTI streetlights will be required at locatiollS
designated by the Public Works Departmellt. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire
hydrants. Final design locations an.d quantity are dete11nined after power designs
are cOlupleted by Idaho Power COlnpany. The street lig11t contractor shall obtain
design and permit froln the Public Works Department prior comme.ncing
ins tall ati OIlS.
7. Any tree over 4" in caliper tllat is removed from the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being tIle equivalent nUlnber of caliper inches of trees
that were relTIoved. Required lal1dscaping trees will not be COl1sidered as
rep.lacernent trees for those trees tllat l1ave to be .mitigated~
8. Submit any up-dated groundwater/soils monitoring data, as collected and
analyzed by a soils scientist, to tIle Public Works Department for review. AllY
drainage areas (detention/retention basins) .must be designed to ensure that water
will percolate or d.ischarge witll a period of tilue not to exceed 24-hours for all
storms up to and il1cluding a 1 DO-year StO.llTI events. Sid.e slopes witl1in drainage
areas shall 110t exceed 3; 1. Any .portion of a drainage area not improved witll
sod/grass seed (or other approved landscaping) sllall not count towards tIle
required open space area. The project engineer s110uld .pay close attention to tIle
results of field studies detellnining tIle ground.water, soil type & alld
characteristics during the d.esign and C011structiOll pllases. TIle engineer shall be
required to certify tIlat tIle street centerlil1e elevations are set a Ininitnum of 3-feet
above tIle .highest established nOflnal groulldwater elevatio.n. This is to ellsure
t11at tIle .bottom elevation of tIle crawl spaces of 110rnes is at least I-foot above
groundwater.
9. TIle ap.plicant shall coordil1ate mailbox locatiol1S with tIle Meridian Post Office.
1 O. Any existing dOlnestic wells and/or septic systems wit11in tl1is project willllave to
be renloved froln tlleir dOlnestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 alld
9-4...8. Wells may be used for 110n-dOlnestic purposes suc.h as landscape irrigation.
11. COlnpact.ion test results Inust be subnlitted to tIle Meridian Building Departlnellt
for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit ato.p
filllnateriaL
12~ Applicant's engineer \-viII .be required to SUbluit a signed, stamped statelnent
certifying that all street fil1isb cel1terline elevations are set a minillluln of three
feet above the highest establislled nOl1Ual groundwater elevation.
13. TIle applicant shall be required to pay Public Works develo.plne11t plan review,
and construction inspectiol1 fees, as detelmined during tIle plan review process,
prior to sigtlature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
(~.
14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section
404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
15. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance witll and NPDES
Pennittil1g that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
16. Staff's failure to cite specific ordil1ance provisions or terms of the approved
annexation/conditional use does not relieve tIle applicant of responsibility for
cOlnplianceA
17. Preliminary .plat approval shall be subject to tIle expiration provisions set fort.h in
MCC 12-2-46
AGENCY COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DE.P ARTMENT
1. One and two fatuity dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per luil1ute
available for duration of 2110urs to service the entire project. Fire l1ydrants shall be
placed an average 0[500' apart. International Fire Code Ap.pendix C.
2. Acceptance of the water s~pply for fire protection will be by tIle Meridian Water
Departlnent and water quality by the Meridian Water Departlnent for bacteria
tes ti ng.
3. Final Approval of the fire .hydrant locations shall be by the Melidian Fire
D ep actIn ell t.
a. Fire Hydral1ts shall l1ave the 4 'lS" outlet face tIle luain street or .parkitlg lot
aisle~
b. The Fire l1ydrant shall not face a street whicl1 does not l1ave addresses on
it.
c. Fire l1ydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d. Locations with :fire hydrants s:hall 11ave tl1e curb .pail1ted red 1 0' to each
side of the hydrant location..
e. Fire Hydrants shall.be placed 011 corners when spacing pel1uits.
f. Fire hydrants s]lall not have allY vertical obstructions to outlets witl1il1 1 0'.
g~ Fire l1ydrallts shall be placed 18" above finisll grade.
4. Operational fire hydrants and telnporary or pennanent street signs are required
before cOlnbustib.le construction begins.
5. Wllere a portion of the facility or buildil1g llereafter constructed or luoved into or
within the jurisdiction is Inore t11an 400 feet (122 lU) from a l1ydrant on a fire
apparatus access road, as Ineasured by all approved route arOUl1d the exte.rior of tIle
facility or .building, on-site fire hydrants and Inains s11all be provided wllere required
by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout witll an. approved autolnatic
splinkler system installed ill accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903~3.1.2 tIle
distance requirelnent sIlall be 600 feet (183).
(~....
a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be
600 feet (183 .m).
b. For buildings equipped tlu"oughout with an approved autolnatic sprinkler
systelTI installed in accordance with Section 903 .3.1 ~ 1 or 903~3~ 1.2, the
distance requirelnent shall be 600 feet (183 m).
6. All pOrtiOllS of the buildings located 0.11 this project lUUSt be witllin 150' of a paved
surface as Ineasured around tIle pemneter of the building.
7. All cormTIon driveways sIlall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and
48' outside and shall have a clear drivil1g surface which is 20' wide. Said conunon
driveway sllall have a Ininiln.ulTI GVW of 70,000 Ibs~ No parking signs s11all .be
installed on any COlTIlnon driveway that doubles as a fire lane~ Coordinate the
location of the required signage with tIle Meridian Fire DepartInent
MERIDIAN P AR.KS DEPARTMENT
1 A Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance will be followed.
2. Standard Plan for Protectioll of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard
establisl1ed ill tIle City of Meridian Landscape Ordil1allce will be followed.
SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY
1. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed reVIew of your
proposal~
2. sse will.not provide trasIl pick-up services utilizing tIle COllin.on driveway. The
developer shall install a concrete pad at tIle end of tIle COlIDnon drive no 1110re
than five (5) feet bellil1d tIle sidewalk. TIle pad sllall be of sufficient area to
aCCOID1TIodate tIle receptacles of tIle residellces tl1at take access froln the COllllllon
driveway.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. The applical1t s11all do one of the following ab.utting the site on Ustick Road:
a. Dedicate by donation an adclitiol1al 23-feet of right-of-way alol1g Ustic.k Road,
and construct a IninilTIUm 5-foot wide COllcrete sidewalk along Ustick Road,
located a mil1iln.ulTI of 41-feet from the centerline of the rig.ht-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additiol1al right-of-way, but constlu.ct a millilTIUm 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road, located a minimum of 41-feet froIn the
centerline of the rigllt-of-way, ill all easemel1t provided to tIle District.
(..,U. .
("
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, b.ut construct a minillluln 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk along Ustick .Road, located at the back edge of the existing
rigllt-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate
existing drainage and utilities~
2. Dedicate by donation a total of 60-feet of right-of-way from tIle centerline along
Black Cat Road~
3. Extend the stub street, Nielnann Street, from tIle east property line into the site, as
proposed.
4. Construct Niemalm Street within the site as a 36-foot street section witll rolled
curb, gutter, al1d 5-foot concrete sidewalks witllil1 50-feet of right-of-way.
5. Direct access to Ustic.k Road and Black Cat Road is prohibited and shall be .noted
on tile final plat.
6. COlnply witll all Standard COl1ditions of ApprovaL
Standard Conditions of Approval
I. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the rigllt-of-way~
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the
site shall be borne by tIle developer.
3. .Replace a.ny existing dalnaged curb, gutter al1d sidewalk and any that Inay be
dalnaged during tIle COl1stluction of the proposed development Contact
Construction Services at 387-6280 (Wit}l file nUlnber) for details~
4. Utility street cuts ill' paveluent less tllan five years old are 110t allowed ullless
approved in writing by tIle District COlltact tIle District's Utility Coordil1ator at
387-6258 (with file numbers) for details~
5~ All design and COllstructiol1 sllall be in accordallce with the Ada County High.way
District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved suppleluents,
COllstruction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinallces unless
specifically waived l1erein. An engineer registered in tIle State of Idaho shall
prepare and certify all ilnprovelnent plans&
6. The applicant sllall sublnit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of
building pennit (or otller required pellnits), which incorporates any required
design changes.
7. Constructio.n, use and property developl11ent shall be in cOllformance witll all
applicable requirelnents of the Ada County Highway District prior to District
approval for occupallcy.
(-:... .
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required .-prior to buildil1g co.nstruction
in accordance witll Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District
Road hnpact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of tIle ap.plicant to verify all existing utilities within tIle
rig.ht-of-way. The applical1t at no cost to ACHD shall repair existi11g utilities
damaged by the applicant. The applical1t shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-
800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within
ACHD right-of-way. TIle applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-
6190 in the event any ACH.D conduits (spare or filled) are cOlnpromised durillg
any phase of construction.
10. No Chatlge in the tenn.s and COllditions of this approval s11all be valid unless tlley
are in writi.ng and signed by tlle applicant or the applicant's authorized
represelltative and an autllorized representative of tIle Ada COUl1ty Highway
District TIle burden sIlall be upon tIle applicant to obtain written confinnatioll of
any change from the Ada County Higllway District.
11 6 Any cl1ange by the applicant in the planned use of tIle property whicl1 is the
subject of this application, shall require tIle applicant to cOlnply witll all rules,
regulations, orditlances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at
tIle tilue tIle applica.nt or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of
its intent to change the planned use of the subject .property unless a
waiver/variance of said. req.uirelnents or otller legal relief is granted purs.uant to
tIle law in effect at tIle tilne tIle cllange ill use is SOUgl1t
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
1. Nalnpa & Meridia11 Irrigation District requires tllat a Land Use Cllange
Application be filed, for review, .Plior to final platting. Please contact DOlula
Moore at 466-7861 for furtl1er infonnatioll~
26 All laterals and waste ways tnust be protected.
3. The District's 8-Mile Lateral courses along tIle SO.Utll boundary of this
proposed project. Tllis easelnent luust be protected and anyencroaclunent
without a siglled License Agreelnent al1d approved .plan, .before any
constluction is stalted, is unacceptable.
4. AlIln.unicipal surface d.rainage .must be retail1ed 011 site.. If any mUJlicipal
surface drainage leaves the site, tile N.alnpa & Meridian In'igation District
luust review draillage pla.ns.
5. The developer ill.USt cOlnply with Idallo Code 31-3805. It is reCOlTIlnel1ded that
ilTigation water be made available to all developments witl1ill the Naln..pa &
Meridian Irrigatioll District.
(".
\~
EXHIBIT D
Klamath .Basin Subdivision
AZ-04-035
Zoning Amendment Findings
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning
Amendlnents, both the P&Z COlnlnission and Council are required "to review the
pal1icular facts and cirCUlnstances of each pro.posed zoning alnendlnent in tenns of fhe
following standards and shall find adequate evid.e.nce al1sweri.:ng tIle following questions
about the pro:posed zoning amendlnent."
The following is tIle list of standards fo.und ill 11-15-11 and analysis by City Council:
A. Will the nelV zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
City Council finds tllat the proposed zoning designation, R-4, is l1annonious wit11
and in accordance with tIle 2002 Compre.hensive Plan and Future .Land Use Map,
w.hich designates the land to be Low Density Residential. Residential densities of
tlnee dwelling units or less per acre are allowed per tIle COln.prel1ensive Plan; the
proposed gross density of Klalnath Basin S.ubdivision is 2.63 dweIlil1g units per
acre. In addition, in the a.p.plicallt's cover letter several COlnprellensive Plan
policies are listed, whicl1 support the anllexation and proposed residential use of
the property~
.B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
City Council does not anticipate that the applicant intends to rezon.e the subject
property in the future.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
.permits;
City Co.uncil finds tllat sil1gle-family residential uses are allowed witl1in the
requested zoning district of R-4. The accolnpanying plat demonstrates tIle land
will be developed with lot sizes, housing types and other dilnensional
requirements that conform to the .proposed zoning designatiol1. NOTE: The
applicant will need to obtain variance ap.proval froIn the City Council because the
proposed plat includes a dead-e.nd street that exceeds the rnaXilllU1TI cul-de-sac
lengtll established by code.
(,:. . ..
(:::r.:..
D. .Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas \vhich may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. :For example, have the streets been ,v.idened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
City Co.uncil fil1ds that properti.es to the east and no.rt]lwest have recently been
approved for developlnent similar to the pro:posed s.ubdivision. Staten Park
Subdivision to the east and Birchsto.ne Creek Subdivision to the nort.hwest are
both single-family developtnents with residential densities similar to the proposed
plat Except for the large RUT parcel across Ustick .Road and four small parcels
directly south of tIle subject parcel, the entire section l1as already been annexed
into the Meridian City limits. Tllis is one of the last parcels designated 'Low
Density Residential' 011 tl1e Future Land Use Ma.p tllat has not been annexed and
approved for develoPlnent in Section 3, Towns.hip 3 NOrt]l, Ral1ge 1 West
The arterial streets abutting this site, Ustick Road and Black Cat Road are
currently not il1cluded within ACHD's Five Year Work Prograln for roadway
iluprovements.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
The existing character of the area will, and is, currently changing, especially upon
build-out of the proposed project and otller silnilar subdivisions in the general
ViC.il1ity. City Council fin.ds that the .proposed R-4 zoning al1d su.bsequent single-
falnily residential uses proposed in the prelilninary .plat are consistent witll the
il1tellded character of tIle vicinity, as depicted on tIle Future Land Use Map. City
Council also finds tllat the .proposed zoning/uses call be designed and constructed
in a Inallner that will be 11armoll1ouS with and ~ppropriate in appearance witll the
existing and intended cllaracter of the surround.il1g area. Altllough tl1ere will be an
impact of tIle subject developluellt 011 the existing cllaracter of the area, City
Council finds that tIle ilnpact is consistent with the it1tended character of the area;
a Inix of low and Inediulu density residential.
F. Will the proposed uses not be .hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
City COUllCil does not anticipate that tIle proposed residelltial uses will be
hazardous as long as the COl1ditions o.ut.lined :in this report are complied witl1 and
constructiol1 traffic and house C011struction is conducted ill a l11anner consistent
with City Code.
( .
(~'
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highlvays, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, se\ver or that the person responsible fO.f the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of suc.h services;
The applicant will .be responsible for the extension of utilities to and throug.h this
.proposed developlnent~ Sizing and routing shall.be coordinated with the Public
Warks Departlue.nt.
The applicant and/or future property OWl1ers will be required to .pay park and
highway ilnpact fees.
On. January 25,2005, ACHD approved this develo.ptuent with site-specific and
stalldard conditions~ Please review the ACHD report for additional information
regarding this finding.
On January 14, 2005, a joint agency/departlnent COlTIlnel1ts meeting was :held with
representatives of key service providers to this property. Based on the joint
agency/departlnent lneeting and atIler comments received from
agencies/departlnents, City Council finds tllat the public services listed above can
be lTI.ade availa.ble to aCCotTIlTIodate the .proposed developluenL
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
If approved, the developer will be financing the extension of sewer, water, local
street infrastructure, utilities and irrigation services to serve the project TIle
pritnary public costs to serve the future reside.nts will be fire, .police and school
facilities and services. City Council finds there will .not be excessive additiol1al
requirelnents at public cost and that tile pro.posed zoning and subsequent
develo.p.m.e.nt will not be detrimental to tIle COlTIlnunity's econolnic welfare.
I. Will the .proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equi.pment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
City COUI1Cil finds tl1at t]le proposed alUlexation and the development of single-
fatuily .homes on this site will not involve uses that will create nuisances tl1at
would be detrilnental to the general welfare of tIle surrounding area~
AC.HD projects this development will generate 110 additional vehicle trips per
day. City COUI1Cil recogllizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase witll the
approval of this. subdivision; .however, City COUI1Cil does not believe that the
(~.... .
alTIOunt generated will be detriluental to the general welfare of the public~ City
Council does not al1ticipate tIle proposed annexation and su.bsequent uses will
create excessive traffic (see fi.nding "J" below), 11oise, smoke, fulnes, glare, or
odors~
J.. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property lvhich shall be so
designed as not to create a.n interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
TIle ap.plicant is proposing to extend tIle existing .pu..blic stub street (Nielnann
Street) to the east, as the only vehicular access into the site. ACHD is requiril1g
Nielnann Street to be extended as proposed. No other access to Ustick Road or
Black Cat Road .has been approved .by ACHD with the subject application.
The extellsion ofNielnann Street will cause traffic volumes on the existing streets
in Staten Park Subdivision to inc.rease~ However, if tIle extension of Niemanll
Street :is constructed as approved by ACHD, City Coun.cil does not believe tIlat
the subdivisio.n will create interference with traffic 0.0 the surrounding pu.blic
streets.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
There are severalluature trees OIl this .property. Any existing trees larger thatl 4"
caliper tllat are relTIoved sllo.uld be luitigated for, per tIle Landscape Ordinance~ If
tIle all-site trees are protected and luitigated for, as required by the Meridian Parks
Departlnent, City COUI1Cil finds that the proposed. develoPlnent will not result ill
tIle destructiol1, loss or dalnage of any natural feature(s) of luajor iJnportance~
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best .interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
City Cou.l1cil finds tllat all essential services are available or will be .provided by
tIle developer to tIle subject property and will not require unreasonable
expel1diture of public funds. The applicant is proposing to develop the land in
substantial conlplial1ce witll the City's COluprehensive Plan (low density
residential). Lal1ds to tIle east, west and. northwest of the subject property .have
already been approved for annexation and development and this is a logical
expal1sioll of the City lilnits. In accordance with tIle findings listed above, City
Council finds tllat the alUlexationlzoning of tllis property would be in the best
interest of tIle City.
("
~~....
EXHIBIT E
:K1amath Basin Subdivision
PP-04-045
Preliminary Plat Findings
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In detennining tIle acceptallce of a
proposed subdivision, the COlTIlUissionlCouncil shall consider the o.bjectives of this title
and at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development
Plan;
City Council finds that tIle .proposed application is in substantial co.mplian.ce with
the adopted Future Land .Use Map of the Cotnprellensive Plan (Cllapter VII). TIle
proposed density, 2.63 dwelling units per acre (gross), 3.39 dwelling .units per
acre (net) is in compliance with the land use classification, low density residential,
noted on the .map.
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
City Council finds tl1at .public services are available to accommodate the proposed
developlnent (See fi.nding "G" under Annexation al1d Zoning Analysis for luore
detail. )
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Because tIle developer is installing sewer, water, and utilities for tIle developtne.nt
at their cost, City Council finds tllat the subdivision will not require the
expellditure of capital ilnprovelnent ful1ds~
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
See finding "G" under AlUlexatioll and Zoning Allalysis a.bove, and the Agency
COlTIlUellts and Conditions at tIle end of this report for lnore detaiL
E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to
the Commisslon's attention.
City COUI1Cil is not aware of any healtll, safety or environlnel1tal problelns
associated with the developlnent of this subdivision that should be bro.ught to tIle
Councilor COlnmission's attention. ACHD COl1siders road safety issues i.n tlleir
analysis; ACHD has approved this subdivisio.n, with. conditions~
( ...
(.:......
March 11, 2005 V AR 05-004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15,2005
APPLICANT Randy Worden ITEM NO~ 5-E
REQUEST Findings for Approval- Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
450 feet to 535 feet for Klamath Basin Subdivision - 4625 West Ustick Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY AlTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DE?T:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached findings
vJ-I
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: mlc\lOS- Phone:
Staff Initials: i.R
"-
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian..
(: .
('
FIN.DINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF ~%.._"tl.jfl~~~~
DECISION & ORDER IJII..w..t
In the Matter of Request for a Variance to the Maximum Cul-de-sac Length for Klamath
:Basin Subdivision, by B & A Engineers, Inc.
Case No(s). V AR-05-004
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 1, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1 ~ Hearing Facts
a. A .notice of a public hearing was pu.blislled for two (2) consecutive weeks .prior to
the City Council public hearing, the first publication a.ppearing and writte.n notice
mailed to property owners or purcllasers of record within tlrree hundred feet (300')
of the external boundalies of the pro.perty. The notice of.public .heari.ng before the
City Council was posted u.pon the .property und.er consideration more tllan one week
.before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code g67-
6509.
The lnatter was d.uly considered by the City Council at tIle March 1, 2005, public
.healing. The applical1t, affected property owners, and govemlnent subdivisio.ns
pro.viding services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were
givell full o.p.portunity to express CO.illluents and sublnit evidence.
.b. Written and oral testitTIony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for written testiln.ony) and in the officiallneeting Ininutes (for
oral testilTIOny).
c. The City Council heard and took oral and written testilnony and duly considered tIle
evidence and the record in this Inatter.
2~ Process Facts
a~ T.here has been compliance with all notice and l1earillg requirements set fOlih in
Idallo Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code 9~ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by tIle Affidavit of.Mailing, and the Affidavit of Pub Ii catiol1 and Proof of
Posting filed with tIle staff report.
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In addition to the application and .pro.perty facts noted in the staff report and tIle
Planning & Z011ing ReCOlTIlUendation for tIle subject application.(s), it is hereby
verified that the property owners of record at the time of issual1ce of tl1ese findings
are Ral1dy an.d Lin.n.ea Worden.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. V AR-OS-004 - PAGE 1 Of 3
(.
4. Required Findings per the Zoning Ordinance
a. See Exhibit B for the fin.dings required for the Variance application under Title 11.
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridial1 shall exercise the powers cOl1ferred upon it .by the "Local Land
Use Plann:ing Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. 967-
6503).
2. TIle Meridian City COUllCil takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and. 12, M.eridian City Code, and all
current zoning lnaps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the
Ilnpact Area and. the Alne.nd.ed COlnprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, w.hich was
adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Ma.ps.
3. Th.e conditions shall be reviewable by the City COUllCil p.ursuant to .Meridian City Code
S 11-17 -9.
4. Due consideration has been given to the cOlnlnent(s) received fraIn the governtnental
subdi visions provid i.ng services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdi ction.
5. That the City l1as granted. an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, whicl1
sIlall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the :Planning and Zonillg Departlnent, th.e Public Works Departlnellt al1d
any affected patty requesting notice.
6~ Tllat this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A.
C. Decisio.n and Order
Pursuant to tIle City COUI1Cil's authority as provided. in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
.based .upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact Wllicll are herein adopted, it is .hereby
ordered that
1. The applicant's Variance request, as evidel1ced by 11aving sublnitted the application
dated Deceluber 16, 2004 (File No. V AR-05-004), is .hereby approved.
D. Ex.hibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Varial1ce Findings
By action of the City Council at its regular Ineeting held on the
m ~~ ' 2005.
c -1'''
/:; -- day of
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. V AR-OS-004 - PAGE 2 of3
t. :
C.
COUNCIL MEMBER SH.A.UN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
CO.UNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTR:EE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
~
MAYOR T A:MMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
By:
CIty Clerk's Office
Dated: 3~\g-"'05
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. V AR-OS-004 - P AG E 3 Of 3
(.
(
...-:......
EXHIBIT A
Klamath Basin Variance
V AR-05-004
Legal Description
I-~ & i\ l.-.~ 1"1 g i 1'1 (~. f~. r S ~ J r1 <...~ ,
I;; ;::~~ // .';: l~\~ .t ~.:;. ~ nl~~ r: ;; \ ~ \ ~~. \,~ {~; ~ ~\.- _ sl ~.~ ~ ~~ \ '; :-: ~, ~
J ~ i 1. ~.! { i z.; .JI~ z"} : ~ :-- ~ .11 r. ~ J l .~ t ~ ~\ :.! ( t ~~.; .... ~ ~ 1 'J r) -; ~. .~..t
I( III fll.ll t II J ~ ~tSitl Su 1)\1 i v is i.o 11
l\nll exu tit}n I) cscri pt it) (1
/\ p~Jn:d 'Of hind situate in Hh.~ northwt:st q uarkr oj' lilt: nordl\vcst quatlcr of Section J,
T{)\vnship -3 Norlh. Range 1 \Vcst Boi:-;~ l\'lcrluiun. Ad~l County.. Idaho~ bK~jng m(1r~.:
rurt kubrly dc;--:;(rih~d as foj It J\\S
L'ollUllenting al the northv":l~st l:ornt'f of suio S~(lit.Hl .)~ the P(")I.NT ()F HEfa NNIN(;~
Tht.'w.;e s~~r' l(r .29"1-~, 77g.7 i kct along lh~ north houndary of saId Se.cb(ln ), h~
the nnrtl1\v..:.st corner of Staten Park Subd.ivision as n:conlcd in Hoob. X() of P~ab at
Pages f)7J.~ and 971..t r~cords of :\d3 ('ounty~
Thence Sf)(F32"3 ] ~~\V ~ j 15,78 kel along the \\"csk~rly boundary of ~laiJ Slakn
1\U'k Subdivi~ion 10 Lhe $outl}\\'C'~[ corner or ~tJid Subul vision 'H the r j~~ht tvt~ k.
(~.(lll~ll ~
Thence N60Z)05~ 1 T~\V. 22.0,'1- teet along said Eight ivtik CanaL
Thcn<:-e N)2~.:!35 '29~'\V. 11 {).rd feel along ~aid Eight f\1ik~ CanaL
lllcnce N S(Y'21 ., 36"\V ~ 23 1 ,Og f~eL along ~wid Eight tvfB(.~ ('anal ~
llwnce N(l2<.~5 5 ~ 3-6' '\]v' ~ 277 -R7 kd alnng ~djd Fight ivlile CanaL
l hcuce N4g;:-"26 "l5'''\V" 153., 9~ feet nlnng, said Light lvtih: CanaL
l.henee N62(}26 ~ 1 ()"'\V. 58, g, 1 k~d ulong ~iaid Fight f\'l He <. 'anal;
lht!n(~ N 7g;! .30 '09~'\V > 4 7 .(~9 fe\.~t ulong. said F.ight tvllle Callal to thl" wt.'sh.'Tl)
houndary n f ~ald See t ion :1:
lhence NOO'.;.3-~r44"E. 60.24 ket ahHlg. the ~aid wc~t~rl); h~)uwjary of Section :; to
lfl\r~ {J(ll NT ()f~ I~l~(~ INN IN(..;~
The ahqve-de-scrihl:d pan.'c 1 contul ns 5 -0 t arr('~, mflr~ or It~5S.
, .,} :.::j;~~7.:~;;;":j:? ::.~..~; :r.- ,... .-,
c.,:nu:. .
EXHIBIT B
.K1amath Basin Variance
V AR-05-004
Variance Findings
According to Ordinance 11-18-1, Variances, the Council Inay authorize in specific cases a
variance froIn the terms of either the Zoning or Subdivision Ordinance. Specifically, the
Ordinance lists the following Findings (MCCI1-18-3), all of Wllich must be detellnined before
gra.nting a varial1ce:
"A. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that
the strict application of the provisions of this Title would clearly be .impracticable or
unreasonable;
The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Us tick Road and Blac.k Cat
Road. The property has less than 50-feet of frontage on Blac.k Cat .Road, al1d
approxiluately 775-feet offrolltage on Ustic.k Road. A public stub street, West N"ietnalU1
Street, was provided to the property with the recent developlnent of Staten Park
Subdivision to the east. The applicant is proposing to extend said stub street into tIle site4
Once extended, Nielnann Street will be ap.proximately 535-feet long4 Due to the close
proximity of the Black Cat/Ustick Road intersectio.n, City Council does not believe that
having Niemann Street intersect .Ustick Road or Blacl( Cat Road (arterial streets) is a
realistic O.ptiOl1 for tllis property.
Furtller, City Council believes tl1at tIle Eig11t :Mile Lateral is an effective barrier to
applying the strict provisions of this title4 Requiring Nielnann Street to be constru.cted as
a stub street across the Eight Mile Lateral to the south would not be viable condition for a
12-lot subdivision. City COUI1Cil believes that a bridge or a culvert across tllis lateral
would be a burden alld J10t a benefit for the abutting .properties. Further, due to the size
(5-acres) and shape (triangu.lar) of tIle subject parcel and the size (3-acres) of the .parcel to
tIle SOU.t}l, a .public street stub to the south would not be an. efficient use of tile land4
However, an access easement between the subject Klaluatll Basin parcel and t11e 3-acre
parcel to the south could be be.neficial if ACH:D does not allow access to .Black Cat .Road
when the 3-acre parcel .fe-develops (See Site Specific Condition #13 for PP-04-045,
Wllic.h the P & Z Co.mtnission added as a requirelnent)4
City Council finds that if an easelne.nt is provided to the parcel to the south, granting a
variance will H.Ot significantly affect tIle otller :properties in the general vicinity. City
Council finds tllat requiring a public street stub to the SOUtll or extending Nielnaml Street
to Ustick Road or .Black Cat Road would be in the best interest of tIle City of the
travelil1g public.
B. Th.at strict compliance with the requirements of this Title would result in
extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual
~/ .
(..,..
('..:.... .,
topography, the nature or condition of adjacent development, other physical
conditions or other conditions that make strict compliance with this Title
unreasonable under the circumstances, or that the conditions and requirements of
this Title will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Title;
In this case, City Council believes that strict compliance with the City's maxitn'um cul-
de-sac length would effectively hamper the re-development of the su.bject .property for
residential use. It is silnply im.practical to .provide a cul-de-sac that lTI.eets tIle City's
established standards and still provide an efficient residel1tial .use of the land~ Due to the
dilnel1sions of the subject parcel, tile close .proximity to the Ustick/Black Cat Road
intersection, and tIle Eight Mile Lateral to the soutll, strict cOlnpliance would result ill an
extraordinary hardship to tIle developer and inhibit tIle re-developmellt of the su.bject site.
c. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's
welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated;
City Council anticipates tllat tIle variance will not be detrilue.ntal to the public's welfare
or injurious to other properties ill the area (no negative testilTIOl1Y was offered at the
hearing for tIle :Prelilninary .Plat applicatio.n). Further, the Council has granted cul-de-sac
variances to properties with similar situations, and City Council is unaware of any
h.annfuI ilnpacts frOlTI these variances~
D. That such variance ,viii not have the effect of alter.ing the interest and purpose of
this Title and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan."
City Council finds that the issual1ce of a variance for a 535-foot cul-de-sac~ to allow the
redevelopluellt of a residential piece of property will not have the effect of alteril1g the
purpose and/or interest of tIle Zoning Ordinallce or the COlTI.prel1ensive Plan.
(:. .
(,: ..
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Jaya Construction
AZ 04-034
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-F
REQUEST Findings for Approval - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19 .63 acres from RUT
to R-8 zones for Hacienda Subdivision - 6000 North Meridian Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: ~~ J Lr~ Date: 2" ()C- Phone:
Emailed: ~O~Wf\P, \ o..(\ct~(}<l"S~~~?~ f\-e..t Staff Initials: /..-R__
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
See attached Findings
(::.......
CITY 0 F MERIDIAN lzSG1{;;*'02^IJ .i\t1%S:~SX1j
DECISION & ORDER
.In the matter of a request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from RUT to R-8 zone
AND Preliminary Plat approval of ninety-six (96) single-family residential and twenty-eight
(28) common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone AND Conditional Use Permit
approval for a Planned :Oevelopment for a :ResidentiaI Subdivision \vith Reduced Lot
Frontages, Reduced Lot Sizes, and Zero Lot Lines, including Clubhouse and Swimming
Pool for Hacienda Subdivision, by Doug Jayo.
Case No(s): AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052
:For the City Council Hearing Date(s) of: Fe.bruary 15 and MarcIl 1, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public l1earing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks .prior to
the City Co.u.ncil public hearing, the first publication appearing and written 110tice
Inailed to .property ow.ners or purchasers of record. within tlu.ee hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the property. The notice of.pu.blic .hearing before tIle
City Council was posted upon the property under consid.eration .more th.an one wee](
before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistel1t witll Idaho Cod.e g67-
6509.
The lnatter was duly COl1sidered by tIle City Council at the February 15, 2005 and
continued to the MarcIl 1., 2005, public l1earing(s)~ The applicant, affected property
owners, and govemlnent subdivisions providing services within the .platll1:ing
jurisdiction of tIle City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express
COlnments and sub.mit evidel1ce.
b. Written and oral testilTIOny was received on this matter, as reflected in the records
of tIle City Cler.k (for written testilTIOny) and ill th.e official meeting mil1utes (for
oral testimony).
c. The Planning al1d Zoning COlnlnission COl1ducted a public l1earing al1d issued a
written recolnmendation on. tIle su.bject Inatter to tIle City Cou.nciL
d. The City Council heard and took oral and writtel1 testilllol1Y and d.uly considered tIle
evidence al1d tIle record in this Inatter.
2. Process Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034~ PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE I Of 5
(
(~<~,.. .
a. There has been complial1ce with all notice and llearing requirelnents set forth in
Idaho Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code 9~ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and tIle Affidavit of Publication and .Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report.
3~ Applicatioll and Property Facts
a. In addition to tIle application. and .property facts noted in the staff report and the
Planning & Zoning Recoffilnendation for tIle subject application(s), it is hereby
verified that the property owner(s) of record at tIle tilue of issuance of these
findings is Micllael Ad.kins (sale pel1ding to Doug Jaya).
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a~ See Exhibit F (An.nexation and ZOllil1g), Exllibit G (Preliluinary Plat) and EX]libit H
(Conditional Use Pennit) for the findings required for tIlis application.
B~ Conclusions of Law
1 ~ The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers co.nferred upon it by tile "Local Land
Use Plaillli.ng Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. ~67-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Cou.ncil tal(es judicial 110tice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Development Ordillances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridiall City Code, and all
current zoning lna.ps tl1ereof. The City of:Meridian has, by ordinance, establis.hed tIle
IIn.pact Area an.d tIle Atnended Compre.hensive Plan of tIle City of Meridiall, Wllicll was
adopted A.ugu.st 6, 2002, Resolutiol1 N.o. 02-382 and Maps.
3~ TIle co.nditions s.hal] be reviewable by tIle City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code
g 11-17-9.
4. Due consideration has been giVe!l to the comment(s) received froIn tIle gove111mentaI
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian plal1nil1gjurisdiction.
5. It is found .public facilities al1d services required. by the pro.posed developlne.nt will .not
ilnpose expense upon tIle public if tIle attac.hed COl1ditiollS of approval are i:ln.posed.~
6. That the City 11as granted an order of approval ill accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by tIle Mayor al1d City Clerk and tllen a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the Plannin.g al1d Zoning Departm.ent, the Public Warks Departlnel1t and
any affected party requ.esting notice.
7. That tllis approval is subject to the .Legal Description ill Exllibit A, tIle Prelilninary Plat
in Ex11ibit B, and tIle Conditions of Ap.provaI in Exhibit C, D and E~ T.he conditions are
COl1cluded to be reasonable al1d the applicant sh.all meet SUCll requirelnel1ts as a
condition of approval of tIle ap.plication.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS), AZ-04-034~ PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 2 of5
(~::...
c. Decisiol1 alld Ord.er
Pursuant to the City Council's autllority as provided in Meridian City Code ~ 12-3-5 and
based upon tIle above and foregoing :Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it .is l1ereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidel1ced .by having submitted the .Prelilninary Plat
dated February 17, 2005 (revision #4)) is hereby conditionally approved; and
2~ The applicant's Conditional Use PennitlPlanned Unit Development Site Plan as
evidenced~by l1aving sub.mitted tIle Site Plan dated Februaiy 17, 2005 (revision #4) is
hereby conditiollally approved; and
2. T.he conditions of approval are as shown in Exhibits C, D and E.
D. N.otice of Applicable Time Lituits (as applicable)
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Prelilninary Plat Duration
Please take llotice tl1at after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, the oW.ner or
developer shall have one year witl1in Wllic.h to file tIle request for approval of the final
plat. After approval of final .plat, the owner or developer shall have one year to begin
construction of the public utilities and one year tl1ereafter to complete construction of
those public facilities. (MCC 12-2-4.B & C.)
2. Notice of Eighteen (1 8) MOllth Conditiollal Use Pe.nn.it Duratio.11
Please take notice that the cond.itiol1al use pennit sllall .be valid for a Inaximum .period
of eiglltee.n (18) lnonths unless otherwise approved by the co.unciL During tllis tilne,
the pelluit 1101der lTIUst COlTIlnenCe the use as pennitted in accordance witll the
conditions of a.pproval, satisfy the requirelnellts set forth in tIle conditions of ap.proval,
acquire building pennits and COlnmence constructiol1 of permanent footings or
structures on or in the ground. In tl1is COl1text "structures" sIlall include sewer and
water lines, streets or building constluction. TIle applical1t has specified. in the
application and to the commission and council a COl1structio.ll scl1edule and cOlnpletion
date for tile project. If the completion date specified for tIle project is exceeded, the
conditional use application sIlall becolne null and void. However, the ap.plicant may
SUbluit an applicatio.ll for a tilue extellsion on the project for city council review. The
application for time extel1sion s11all be su.bmitted at least tllirty (30) days prior to the
deadline for cO.lupletion of tIle project. For projects requiring .platting, the final plat
Inust be recorded within this eighteen (18) III 0 nth period. For projects with multiple
phases, the eigllteen (18) lTI0.11th. dead.1ine sIlall apply to the first phase~ In the event that
the development is made in successive contiguous segtnents or multiple phases, suc.h
p11ases shall be COl1structed witllin successive intervals of one year froIn the original
date of approval by the council. If the successive p11ases are not subluitted wit11ill one
year intervals, the conditional approval of the future pl1ases s.hall be null and void.
CITY OF MERlDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). AZ-04-034, PP-04-043) CUP-04-052 - PAGE 3 Of 5
(r
ff-/........ .. .
i
\......~... ..
(MCC 11-17-4.B~)
.E. Notice afFinal Action and Right to Regulatory Takings A.nalysis
1. The Applicant is 11ereby notified tllat p.ursual1t to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request "lTIust be in writing, al1d .must be filed
with tIle City Clerk not more than twenty-eig.ht (28) d.ays after the fil1al decision
cOl1cerl1ing the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll tIle
time period within which a Petitioll for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final actio.u of tIle govellling body of tIle City of
Meridian, p.ursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected .person beil1g a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by tile issuance or de.nial of
tIle c0.11ditional use permit approvallnay within twenty-eigllt (28) days after tIle date of
tIlls decisio.n and order seek a j.udicial review as provided. by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
:F . Ex.hibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved Preliluil1ary Plat
Exhibit C: Almexation and Zon-il1g Co:mments
Exhibit D: .Prelilninary :Plat Co.nditions of Approval
Exhibit E: Conditiol1al Use Pennit Conditions of Approval
EX]libit F: Annexation & ZOlling .Findillgs
Exhibit G: Prelirninary Plat Fil1dings
Exhibit H: Conditional Use Permit Findings
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
!llMC~' ,2005.
15~6 dayof
COUNCIL MEMBER. SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
~
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). AZ-04M034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - P AG E 4 Of 5
)~""".
("
~\ . ..
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
Attest:
and City Attorney.
Dated: ~~..-\~-OS
By:,
City Cler.k's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & OR.DER
CASE NOeS)L AZw04M034~ PP-04-043, cur-04-052 - PAGE 5 of5
('......
EXHIBIT A
Hacienda Subdivision
AZ-04-034
Legal Description
Annexation Boundary Description
For
Jayo Company
A parcel for annexation purposes located in Government Lots 1 and 2 in the NVv j4 of
Section 30~ To\vnship 4 Northt Range 1 East Boise Meridianl Ada Counlyt Idaho, more
parttcurarly described as follows~
Commencing at a brass cap monun1ent marking the southwest corner of said NW X
(~ comer), from which a 5/B inch diameter iron pin marking the northwest corner of said
Government Lot 2 bears N Q002-03u Wad istance of 1330 ~ 58 feet;
Thence N O~02'03l'1 W along the westedy boundary of said NW ~ a distance of 796,14
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNJNG~
Thence continuing along said westerly boundary N 00021031' W a distance of 534.44 fe.et
to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin ~
Thence continuing along said westerly boundary N Otl01.30~ W a distance of 261 ~ 12 feet
to a paint:
Thence leaving said westerly boundary N 89G40t43!~ E a distance of 1100.65 feet to a
518 in ch diameter iron pi n;
Thence S 0002t36~ W along the easterly boundary of said Government Lots 1 and 2 a
distance of 795.12 feet to a 5/8 inch dianleter iron pin~
Thence leaving said easteriy boundary S B9Q39~20~~ W a distance of 1 099.61 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
This parcel contains 20<09 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use,
Cii nton W. Hansen~ PLS
La rid Sorutions r PC
November 8~ 2004
(\ 1:1 "1 n1V.~
pUB\.\G
t.\cf-{,\O\~~ O'Er'
'l~oRf'
~ g:
,~.. . ..... ......_.. ... ~ .' r r ~
~.j ~ ~ :
(:
\.
EXHIBIT B
(~~.,...
\: .
Hacienda Subdivision
(PP-04-043, CUP-04-052)
Approved Preliminary Plat/S.ite Plan
.~ ......t-. : ~. ~ ~n:
fr.t #iF ).fI~,,"{). (
1M; E'~
: ;1~t-".. .. :- ~ ~ v
~i
F ~:
.:W
.I.
i
~
J
...~.;>
:~.::. :F.:...~ ~...~ : ti' t
-: rI' .- Z. ".:_
/"
\,' .
<:n:.: '.
EXHIBIT C
Annexation and Z011ing Ap.plication
Hacienda S.ubdivision AZ-04...034
ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal d.escription sublnitted with the application (stalu:ped. by Clinton W. Hansen on 11-
08-04) appears to Ineet the requirements of the City of Meridian al1d State Tax COllllnission
and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within this .project will have to be
relnoved fr01TI their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, wIlen services are
available frDIn the City of Meridian. Wells .luay be used for n.on-domestic purposes such as
landscape irrigation.
3~ All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of.natural waterways, intersectil1g, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinal1ce 12-4-13.
Plans will need to be approved by tIle appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association (ditch oWl1ers), with wlitten approval or 11on-ap.proval submitted to the Public
Works DepartlneJlt. If lateral users association approval can't .be obtained, plans will be
reviewed and. approved .by the Meridian City E.ngineer .prior to final plat signature.
4. Any future subdivisiol1, planned developluent, uses and COllstruction shall cOlnply wit11 the
City of Meridian ordinaIlces ill effect at tIle time.
.<:.:.-. .. ~
(,.,,:...
EXHIBIT D
Conditions of Approval
Preliminary Plat
Hacienda Subdivis.ion
(File PP-04-043)
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS-PRELIMINARY PLAT
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via main title extensio.ns froIn the Nortll SIo.ugh
Trunk that is cU11-ently in the design stage by the City of Meridian. The applicant will be
responsible for co.nstructing the lateral sewer and water .mains to and througll tllis
.proposed deve.lo.pluent, thereby makil1g thelTI available to adjacent .prope.rties. The
subdivision designer is responsible for coordinating Inain sizi.ng and routing with tIle
Public Works Departtnent. This developtnent sllall be subject to latecolner fees, to
reiIn.burse those responsible for bringing sanitary sewer service to the area, wlle11 and if
the Lateco"lners Fee Agreement is established. Latecolner's fees sllall be due and .payable
prior to signature on the final plat for each phase.
This proposed develo.pment is currently 110t serviceable .by tl1e City of Meridian's satlitary
sewer systeln. Proceeding t11fough th.e approval .process is strictly the lisk of the
applicant. The City of Meridian does not guarantee sewer service witllil1 tIle
developtnent time frames outlined in Meridian City Ordinance.
2. Water service to tllis site s.hall be via a 16-incll1nail1 line extension froiu a luain cun-el1tly
being designed by the City of Meridian. The City's project will extend water service up
N~ Meridian Road to Mc:Millan.. The applicant will be responsible for constructing tIle
16-il1Ch dialneter water Inail1s to the Inid-section litle, alld a 12-incll luain to the .nolth
boulldary line exte.nded in Meridian Road. All otb.er mains throu.g11 this proposed
develoPluent sllall be 8-inch dialneter. The subdivision designer is responsible for
coordinating lnain. sizing alld routing witll the Public Works Departlnent This
d.eveloplne11t shall be subject to latecolner fees, to reiluburse those responsible for
bringing water service to th.e area, wllel1 and if tIle Latecolners Fee Agreemellt is
establislled. Lateco.mer's fees shall be due and payable prior to signature on the final plat
for eacll ph.ase.
3 · The applicant .has not indicated who will own and. maintain tIle .pressurized irrigation
systelu within tllis developtnent If the system remains private, plans and specifications
shall be reviewed by tIle Public Works Departlnent as part of the development plan
review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation. systelTI O&M luanuallllust be
submitted prior to plan approval, al1d th.e applicant shall be subject to irrigation plan
review fees. Underground year-roulld pressurized ilTigation lTIUst be provided to all lots
witlli.n this developmel1t. The City of Meridian requires tIlat pressurized irrigation
systelTIS be sup.plied by a .year-round source of water. Applicant s.hall be required to
utilize any existing surface or well .water for the prilnary source~ If a surface or well
source is not availa.ble, a single-:point con.nection to the culinary water system sllalI be
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 1 of6
/:
t:: ..
~~~."". .
{\..:.... .
required. If a single-:point connectio.n is utilized, the developer shall be respo.nsible for tIle
payment of asseSSlnents for the COlTIlTIOn areas prior to signature on the final .plat by the
Meridian City Engineer.
4. If the request is approved by the irrigation district, for all unpiped (o.pen) sections of tIle
North Slougll Lateral, slopes sllall not be steeper than 4: 1. A "typical" detail of tIle cross-
section of these sections sIla!1 be submitted to the P&Z Departlnent for approval with th.e
fil1al :plat landsc~pe .pIan. TIle City Council supports the applicant's intention to 110t pipe
the North Slougll Lateral.
5K Prior to City Council a.p.proval of tIle final plat, the applicant shall SUbluit a written
statelnent froln Settlers Irrigatiol1 District (SID) to tIle P&Z Department clarifying th.e
required easement width for the North Slough drain. Applicant shall Ineet tIle conditiol1S
of SID.
6. The plat shall show Rio Colinas Street as a 36-foot street sectiol1.
7. Graphically depict COlnlnon driveway locations for the toW.nJlouse lots in Blocks 6 and 7.
8. The conceptual landscape plall sublnitted witll tile .preliminary plat (Sheets PPL-C and
PPL-l, dated 11/03/04 by The Land Group) is ap.proved with the following changes:
a. Revise Sheet PPL-l to Sl10W the lal1dscape island in Rio Colinas.
b. Revise Sheet P:PL-l to relTIOVe tIle fellce currently shown encroaclling on Lot 18,
Block 4.
c. No trees will be allowed within sanitary sewer or irrigation easemellts, except as
approved through a separate License Agreelnent. Relocate any trees Sl10W witllin
easelnents to other locatio.l1s within tIle developITI.ent.
d. The applicant s]lalI atte.mpt to obtain a License Agreelnent with SID to plant trees
within tIle North Slougll Lateral easelnent for Lot 20, Bloc.k 6, Lot 1, Block 5,
Lots 1 and. 12, Block 4 and. Lot 1, Block 3. If unsuccessful, the ap.plicant shall
Initigate for tIle required number of trees within. tl1ese com.lTIon areas (1 :8,000 sq.
ft.) within the subdivisiol1. At a IninilTImTI., non-illvasive root s11rubs s11a11 .be
provided within tllese areas, as pennitted by SID.
9. Ul1less otherwise waived by tIle City Council, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals
illtersecting, crossillg or lyil1g adjacent alld COl1tiguous to tIle .parcel shall be tiled per
MCC 12-4-13. Plans willlleed to be approved by Settlers Irrigation District, or lateral
users association (ditch owners), with writtell approval or non-approval submitted to the
Public Works De.partlnent If lateral users association approval call't be obtained, :plans
will be reviewed and approved .by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat
signature.
Meridian City Code 12-4-13-B req.uires that tiled ditches l1ave a sloped .bar-grated inlet
structure and access/cleanout boxes at a Inaximu.1TI. of four hundred foot (400') spacing
and at all angle points of tIle pipeline. TIle applicant shall address the access to each of
these required structures, as sOlne will fall within the back yard of several lots.
H.acienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
.Page 2 Of 6
('..: .
(.:~...'...:
Y"",-...:.. .' .
10. Applicant 811al1 construct a lninimum 5-foot wide, detached sidewalk along the entire
subdivision frontage of Melidian Road and. adjacent to the designated collector roadways.
Coordinate sidewalk location with ACHD.
11 ~ All areas being counted toward the 10% open space amenity shall be free of "wet pOl1ds"
or otller suell nuisances. All stonnwater dete.ntion facilities il1corporated into the required
opel1 space are subject to MCC 1.2-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and
trees, as depicted on the s.ubtnitted landscape plans~ AllY ACHD-required access
driveways to serve stol1llwater areas tllat are located within required o.pen space lots shall
be ShOWll on the d.etailed landscape plans witl1 each final .plat.
12~ Applicant shall COllStruct 6-foot vinyl, perimeter fencing, .u111ess ot11erwise approved by
the Zonil1g Adlnit1istrator~
STANDARD PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS
1. Please subtnit a copy of the Ada County Street Name C01TIlnittee's approval letter for the
subdivisiol1 narue, and the lot and block llumberil1g. Make any con-ections necessary to
confonn.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placelnent witl1 tIle City of Meridian Public Warks Departlnellt.
3~ A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will .be required for all fel1cing,
lal1dscaping, play equip:ment, pressurized irrigatio.11, sanitary sewer, water, etc~, prior to
signature on the final .plat
4. All micropaths wit11il1 the proposed subdivisiol1 shall be designed in accordance with
M CC 12-13 -15 "Micropatll Landscaping".
5. A detailed landsca.pe plan, ill COl11pliance with tIle landscape ordillance shall be subluitted
for the su.bdivisiol1 with tIle fi11al .plat application) the Ialldscape plan s:hall include tIle
location and design of any proposed playground equipment
6. Sidewalks witllill th.e proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC12-13-
1 0-8.
7. 250 and 1 aD-watt, higl1-pressure sodiulTI streetlights will .be required at locations
designated by tIle Public Works Departlnent. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expe.nse~ Typical locatio.l1s are at street il1tersectiol1S and/or fire llydrants~
Final design locations and quantity are deterlnined after power designs are completed by
ldallo Power COlnpany~ The street light contractor sllal! obtain desigI1 and permit frOtTI
the Public Works Department prior cOlulnel1cing installations.
8. Please su.bmit up to date groundwater/soils lllonitoring data to tIle Public Works
Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) luust be designed
H.acienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 3 of6
~"":"" "
j""
\ "
to ensure that water will percolate within a pe.riod of time not to exceed 24 .hours for all
stonns .up to and including a 1 aD-year stonn eve.nt. Side slopes within drainage areas
sIlall not exceed 3: 1 .
9. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being tIle equivalent number of caliper incl1es of trees that
were relTIoved. Required landscaping trees will :not be consid.ered as replacement trees for
those trees that have to be relTI.oved.
1 o. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
11. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within tllis :project will have to be
renloved troIn tlleir dOlnestic service per City Ordinance Section 9..1-4 al1d 9-4-8. Wells
Inay be used for non-dOlnestic purposes such as landsca.pe irrigatio:n.
12. COlnpaction test results .1uust be subluitted to the Meridian Building Departlnent for all
building pads receivillg engineered backfill, w11ere footing would sit atop filllnaterial.
13. Applicant's engineer will be required to sublnit a signed, statnped statelnent certifying
that all street finish centerline elevations are set a luiJlitnum of tllree feet above the
highest established 110nna] groul1d.water elevation.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The existing residence (future clubllouse) sllall be brought up to "Asselnbly" occupancy alld
cOlnply with the IFC.
2. No parking is allowed witllil1 any of the "knuckle" areas of the plat.
3. All roofil1g Inaterials on the attaclled dwelling units sllall be a 11on-cOlnbustible Inate.rial.
4. One al1d two family dwellitlgs will req.uire a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons .per minute available
for duration of2 hours to service t11e entire project Fire hydrallts shall be placed an average
of 400' apart. Inte.rnational Fire Code Appendix 0
5. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protectioll will be by the Meridian Water
:0 epartInen t.
6~ Final Approval of tIle fire hyd.rant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Departlnent.
a. Fire Hydrants shallllave the 4 ~" outlet face tIle Inain street or parking lot aisle.
b. TIle Fire l1ydrant sIlall not face a street w.hicll does not l1ave addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 1 0' to eacl1 side of tIle
hydrant locatioI1.
e. Fire Hydrants sIlaIl be placed on COll1ers.
f. Fire hydrants shall not have allY vertical obstructions to outlets witllin 10'.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 4 of6
{"
{ .
\..'
:f-:-::~~' "
(...:::.. .
7. TIle phasing plan Inay require that an.y roadway greater thall 150' in length
that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have an approved tur.n around.
8. All entrance and internal roads shallllave a tu.rning radius of28' inside and
48' outside radius.
9~ Insure tllat all yet undeveloped. parcels are luaintained free of cOln.bustible vegetatioll.
10. Operatiol1al fire hydrants and. telnporary or pel1nanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins.
11. To increase elnergency access to the site a miniln.ulTI of two points of access will be required
for any portion of the project, whicll serves lTIOre than 50 homes. The applicant sIlall
provide a stub street to the property to the (west/eastlnorthlsouth). The two entrances shall
be separated by no less tl1an ~ tIle diagol1allneasuremellt of tIle project.
12. Buildil1g setbacks shall be per the .Building Code for one and two story constru.ctiOll.
13. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Stalldards and s.hall have a clear
driving surface, available at all tilnes, which is 20' wide~ Streets with less tl1an a 29'
street width sIlaIl have .no parking~ Streets with less than 33' s11all11ave parking only on
one side.
14. Maintain a separation of 5' froln tIle .buildil1g to tIle dUlnpster en.closure.
15~ All po.rtions of tIle .b.uild.illgS located 011 tllis project lTIUst be within 150' of a .paved. surface
as lneasured around the perimeter of the building.
16~ All COllllllon driveways shall be straigllt or l1ave a tunling radius of 28' inside alld 48'
outside and s11al1 have a clear driving surface w.hicl1 is 20' wide.
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1 ~ The pedestrian access to the proposed clubllouse/cOlTIlnunity elltral1ce .is .not well-defined.
The applicant shall SU.bluit a revised landscape .plall that .uses walkway paving materials
and landscaping to alert lTIotor.ists to tIle pedestrian traffic.
2~ The proposed landscapiJlg creates a hiding spot .near alld south of Lot 20, Block 5 and Lot
24, Block 5~ The ap.plicant shall su.b.mit a revised landscaping plan that affords greater
visibility of tIle area froln public areas such as a street or parking lot.
3. AllY interior fencin.g shall allow visibility frOlTI tIle street or shall not exceed four feet in
l1eight if solid fencing is used (pel1ailling to Lot 1, Block 5).
PARKS DE.P A.RTMENT CONDITIONS
1. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in tIle City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13-6) will be followed.
Hacienda Subdivision ~ PP-04-043 - .Exhibit D
page 5 of6
f.
\.
(~... ..
2. Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: T.he standard
establisl1ed in the City of .Meridian Landsca.pe Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13) will be
followed.
SANITARY SERVICES CO. CONDITIONS
I. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal al1d
submit stamped (approved.) plans with your Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance
application.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 6 of6
C.":: .
I~~..:.. .
f . .
t~~./... ..... .
:EXHIBIT E
Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
SIT:E SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (Conditional Use Permit)
1. Applicant sIlall meet all of the requirements of the :prelilninary .plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Permit.
2. A condition of the CUP/PD shall be that the applicant participates in any road
infrastructure agreements in the North Meridian. Planning Area negotiated witll AC:HD
and shall faithfully perfOrlTI the tenns of such agreelTI.ent or agreements.
3. A mil1ilTIUln lO-foot setback from the Rio Vista Drive right-of-way is required for the
existing wall on Lot 1, Block 5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance
for tIle clubhouse lot, the ap..plicant shall meet with the Meridian .Police Chief or l1is
designee on site to d.etermine the proper lighting, fellce h.eigllt, gates and surveillance
Inonitoring around tIle clu.bl1o'use~ Su.b.luit written ap.proval of said Police Department
ap.proval with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance for the clu.bhouse.
4. All development sllall comply with the Americans wit]] Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act, includillg tIle COlnln.unity clubhouse~
5. T.he applicant sllall .provide/construct tile followillg atuenities within the subdivision:
a~ Over 1 0% of the gross area as open space; al1d
b. A COlTItTIunity clubl10use with restroOlTIS and a SWilTIlning pool.
6~ The following deviations from the Z0.11ing al1d Subdivisioll Ordinance (MCC Title 11 and
12) are approved as part of this ap:plication:
Min~ Lot Size- City Requirelnellt (R-8)
6,500 sq~ ft per lot
A.pproved Lot Size
2,850 sq. ft per lot (attached units
only)
Lot Frontage- City Requireluent
65' luil1ilnuln
Approved Minilnum Fro.ntage
32' minim.urn
Zero
Lot Lines-
City Requirelnent
'I per lot (lnax.)
Ap.proved Stal1dard
2 per lot
Hacienda Subdivision - CUP-04-052 - Exhibit.E
page 1 of2
(
rI'.~~rI'.
t" "" "
~\""::""
7~ All areas being counted toward the 1 0% open space amenity shall be free of "wet ponds"
or otller such nuisances. All stormwater detention facilities incorporated into tIle required
open space are subject to .MCC 12-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and
trees, as depicted on the sublnitted landscape plans4
8. A Certificate of Zo.ning COlTI.pliance .must be obtained. for the clubho.use and swilnming
pool prior to applyil1g for building permits.
9. TOWl111ouse Elevations: A varied color al1d/or building material schelne is required for tIle
townllome structures witllin the subdivisio.n~ Applicallt s11al1 obtain written ap.proval fr01TI
tIle P &Z De.partlnel1t for said scheme prior to City Engineer signature of tIle final plat.
.Hacienda Subdivision - CUP-04-052 - Exhibit E
page 2 Of 2
(..
(
EX:HIBIT F
Annexation and Zoning Findings
Hacie.nda Subdivision
(File AZ-04-034)
The City Council.hereby approves the following analysis of required fil1dings by staff:
According to Ordinance 11-1 5-11, General Stalldards Applicable to Zo.ning
Amendments. both the P&Z Commission and COllneil are required (eto review the
particular facts and cirCltmstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the
following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions
about the proposed zoning amendment. "
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that tIle requested zoning designation, R-8, is .hannonious with and in
accordance with th.e 2002 COluprehensive Plan. and P.uture Land Use Map, wl1ich
designates the land to be .Medium De.nsity ResidentiaL There is a Ininilnum target
d.ensity of three (3) du/acre in tIle Comprehensive Plan and Hacienda's gross
density is 4.99 du/acre~ The Future Land Use Map shows a potential :public par.k
site, regiol1al pathway, and future sclloo1 site in this section. A lO-foot wide
regional patll was recently approved ill Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
Subdivisiol1S to the soutll and east. Also, Joint Selloo) District No. 2 l1as
purchased a 41 acre s.ite ill the section (two parcels to the south) and they are 110t
.pursuing any further latld acquisitiollS in Sectiol1 30 at this titne (according to
Welldell Bigham, Facilities Director). P&Z Department staff is not aware of any
efforts the .Meridial1 Parks & Recreation Depart.ment is .undertaking to acquire
land within this section for a public .park~
The COluprehensive Plan contains policies whic11 ellCQUrage developlnent to be
pllased in accordance witll their cOlUlection to the sewer systeln (see policy #8,
page 1 08) and silnilar policies ailned at COl1troIling grOWtll. Tile .parcel is plalll1ed
to be served with the Nortll South Trunk, whicl1 is 110t yet constructed to Merid.ian
Road. TIle Pu.blic Works Departlnent .has been coordil1ating with pro.pel1y owners
to the west and south on tIle extension and aligmnel1t of the trunk line. ParamOullt
Subdivision is currently constructing tIle sanitary sewer and will stub to Meridian
R.oad.
Below are sOlne of the 2002 Comprellensive Plan policies whicl1 generally
support the a.ul1exation request (Staff analysis is s110wn ill italics). TIle application
also lists several other policies WIlich support the a.nnexation:
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 1 of5
(
f~. .. .
l"...:..... .
· "Promote the design of attractive roadway entryway areas tlrroughout
Meridian that will clearly identify the cOlnlnunity~" (Ch. V, Goal III, Obj.
.8 ~ #7)
Hacienda S.ubdivision is proposing a 35-foot wide landscape buffer lot on
Meridian Road with a substantial amount of new landscaping and
hardscaping therein.
· "New developtne.nt should not rely on. cul-de-sacs since they provide poor
fire access, walkability and l1eig.h.borhood social life. New development
and streets should .be designed to encourage walking al1d bicycling." (Ch.
VI, Bullet #2, :pg. 71)
There are no new cul-de-sacs planned within the development.
· "Coordinate with ilTigation districts to provide l11ultiple use of existil1g
irrigation easelnents." (ell. VII, Goal III, O.bj. B, #3)
The applicant is proposing a path'way facility actjacent to the North Slough
Lateral throllgh the majority of the project. They are also .proposing to
keep the facility open as an amenity to the s'ubdivision, which staff
supports.
· ".Require usable open space to be incorporated into new residel1tial
subdivision plats." (eh. VII, Goal IV, Obj. C, #3)
.B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
Staff does not anticipate tllat the applicant inte.nds to rezone tIle subject property
in the future. This is only the fourth urban-scale development and annexation
ap.plication in Section 30, T4N, RIE. Upon extension of tile Nortl1 Slough Trunk
into this square mile, additional reZOl1e requests are anticipated.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff finds that the pro.posed single faluily residential subdivision would be
allowed witllin the requested zoning district of R-8, with a Planned Develo.p.ment
to allow the reduced frontages, reduced lot sizes and zero lot lines.
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
.railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
.Page 2 Of 5
c.... .
(:::........
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that the land to tIle east and south. 1188 been recent.ly annexed and
approved for single-family residential lots in Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
Subdivisions. Saguaro Canyon has a gross density of 3~29 d.u./acre. Paramoullt
Subdivision was alUlexed in 2003 and land itnmediately west of Ventana is zOlled
for professional office and single falnily uses. Larkwood Su.bdivision east of
Saguaro has lot sizes that run approxiluately 2 acres each. TIle proposed
density-4.99 d~u./acre gross-is high.er tllan both Saguaro Canyon and Ve.ntana
yet is within the allowable 3-8 units per acre targeted by the Comprel1ensive Plan.
Thus staff finds tllat s.urroul1ding developmel1ts are mixed de.nsities-either tIle
same or less, but tIle pro.posed density is within the al1ticipated range for a
mediulTI density project ACHD has also reviewed the adjacent street capacity
al1d has approved the proposed subdivision (witll cO.llditions).
Meridian Road (between Cllinden and McMillan) is 110t .programlned within
ACHD's Five Year Work PrograJn~ McMillan Road is ill ACHD's Capital
Ilnprovelnent :Program and is anticipated to be reconstructed in 2018. The
.property is d.esigned to sewer into a portion of the North Slough Trunk that is not
yet co.nstructed.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance lvith the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff fillds that the proposed single family residential use will change the existillg
.tural character of the subject property. There is an estate-type pro.perty south of
Hacie.nda SubdivisioJl. However, according to public testiIno.ny issued at the
Ventana Subdivision City Council11earings, tIle OWl1er is expected to redevelo.p in
the near future. The intended cllaracter of the vicinity is a Inix of urban and
suburban scale developments on a generally gridded street systelTI with a focus on
single faluily and In.ulti-falnily housing at 3 to 8 d.u./acre. The proposed use is
cOlnpatible wit], the Future Land Use Map. The design and density confonns to
lTIOst of tIle Comprellensive Plan policies.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The COlmnission and COU11Cil sh.ould. rely on public testilTIOny (oral and written)
to determine whetl1er or not the proposed. uses will be disturbing or hazardous to
the existing or future neigllboring uses.
Staff does .not anticipate tllat the proposed residential uses will be hazard.ous.
However, staff finds that the new residences lnay be disruptive to existing
agricultural .practices to the north. It should be :noted, however~ tllat tlle
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit.F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 3 of5
(..
fY..
\ ..
COlnmission alld Co.uo.cil made this finding in th.e affirmative during the Saguaro
Canyon and. Vental1a Subdivision hearings for tIle saine rural pro.petties.
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be arulexed will or can .be served adequately by
most essential public facilities and services if all conditions of approval are rnet
by the applicallt. The applicant shall be required to extend sanitary sewer and
water luains to atld through tIle pro.posed developlnent, thereby lna.king thelTI
available to the adjacel1t properties. The applicant and/or future pro.perty owners
will be required to pay park and higllway itnpact fees as well as constluct on-site
stormwater drainage fac:ilities~
Please review ACHD, Police and the Fire Department's COlTIlnents concerning
this subdivision for furtller inforlnatiol1 regardi11g .public services and facilities.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds tllat there will not be excessive additiol1al requirelnents at public cost
for public services alld facilities, if tIle applicant com.plies with. the COllditions of
appro.val for tIle accolnpanying conditio.nal use perluit and preliminary plat
applications.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by .reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff recognizes that traffic and noise will increase significantly u.pon .build-out of
tIle pro.posed su.bdivision. The Co.rnmission and Council should refer to the
ACH:D staff report for specific details on traffic irnpacts. The traffic el1gineer for
Ventana Subdivision deterluined that, even at project build-out in 2009, Meridian
Road will function at all LOS C or better. Staff does .not feel that tIle arnau.nt
generated will be detrimental to tIle public welfare if all City and ACHD
conditions of approval are met.
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will 110t involve uses tllat would create
other nuisances that would be detrimental to tIle general welfare of the
SUITOUl1dillg area.
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - :Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 4 Of 5
f
\
{.( .
\",
J. Wjll the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff fil1ds that the subdivision's two ve.hicular approaches off of Merid i all Road
are aligned wit}l existing pro.perty lines on the west side of .Meridian Road al1d
cOlnply with the turn lane and intersection co.ntrol COllditions ilnposed .by ACHD~
The other proposed roadways will need to be improved in compliance with
ACHD requ.irelnents in order to alleviate interference with the existing and
proposed intersections. We do find that, as proposed, the Rio Colinas Street stub
to the east is sllown as a 32-foot wid.e street section~ The standard public street
section is 36 feet~ V.pon future redevelo.plnent of the parcel in Blythe :Estates
S.ubdivision (to east), tllis four (4) foot discrepancy Inay create an interferellce
wit11 future traffic~ Staff is recomlnendil1g this street be designed to a stalldard 36-
foot section in this area.
The CO.lnrnissiol1 and Cou.ncil should review ACHD co.mlnents concerning
ve.hicular approaches alld traffic ge.neration. TIle ACHD Commission l1as
ap.proved the Hacienda Su.bdivision prelilninary plat application.
:K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds tl1at no natural or scel1ic features of Inajor importance will be lost or
dalnaged by approving the al1nexation and re-zo.ne~ The Nortl1 SIo.ugh does bisect
the .property and is proposed to .be piped undergroul1d for short seglnents througl1
the .project :However, this facility is not cOllsidered to be a feature of "lnajor
impol1ance" for the COrntnUllity~ Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper tllat are
removed shall be :mitigated for, per the :Landscape Ordinance.
.L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
Staff finds that sewer, water, irrigation, solid waste, library, fire and street
services are available to the site. Existing ele.mentary school capacity relnains an
ilu.portant but undetennilled factor for this subdivision~ The scllool district l1as
stated in the past (for otller N.ortll Meridian developments) that additional students
will furtller cOin.pound the current overcrowded situation and residents cannot be
assured of attend.il1g the neigllborhood school. Both Havasu Creek and ParalTIOUllt
Subdivision have been a.pproved for new eleluentary scl1ools, although neither of
t]lese sites has a construction date at tllis titne.
Long-range planning in th.e North Meridian area llas been underway since 2001~
This area is a part of the North Meridian Area Plan~ The proposed use and
density generally comply with this plan. Staff fi.nds that the annexation of this
property is largely in tIle best interest of the City.
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - .Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of La\v & .Decision and
Order
page 5 of5
(
fY;';" . . '.
t..:. . :
EXHIBIT G
Preliminary Plat Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File PP-04-043)
T.he City Council here.by approves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
Sections 12-3-3 J~2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In deternlining the acceptance of a
proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title
and at least the following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision wlth the Comprehensive
Development Plan;
Staff finds the su.bdivisiol1 to be in substantial confo:rmance witll the
COlnprehensive Plan, as noted in Fillding "A" under tIle Hacienda Al1nexation and
Zoning applicatiol1~
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
As noted under Findings G and L of tIle H.acienda Annexation al1d Zoning
ap.plication, staff finds that all public services are available to aCCOllllTIodate tIle
.proposed developtnent
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital
improvement program;
The proposed subdivision would. 110t create allY lTIOre additional requirelnents or
delnands to the City than otller stal1dard residential uses~ TIle Pu.blic Works
Departlnent elP in.eludes tIle North Sloug.h Trunk extellsion, which this propel1y
will drain to. The developer will need to construct off-site sewer and water
ilnprovelnents in N. Meridian Road, in accordance witll the Master Facility Plan.
d. The public fmancial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds tllat the developluellt will require public expe.n.ditures for exte.nding the
North Slougll Trunk. Specifically, tIle Public Works Inust enter into a contract
with a pri vate finn to acquire easelnents, design and construct the lil1e. The
funding for this e.xtension is budgeted in tIle FY04 budget, witll a .preliminary
Hacienda Subdivision (PP-04-043) - Exhibit G. - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 1 of2
.(
(
estimated schedule of construction cOlnpletion by June 2005.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought
to the Commission's attention.
Other than .previously noted, staff does not find any otller healtll, safety or
envirOll1nental problems associated with this subdivisiol1 that need to be brought
to the Councilor Commission's attentio.t1.
H.acienda Subdivision (PP-04-043) ~ Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 of2
(
EXHIBIT H
Conditio.oal Use Permit Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
The City Council hereby approves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
The Commission and COllncil shall review the particlllar facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditionalllse
permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-
17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the pro.posed use and all yards,
open spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by
this ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject propeliy is large e.noug.h to aCCOffilTIodate tIle requested
use and all other required features as noted above.
:8. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of
this Ordinance;
See Fil1ding "A" under the Anllexation. and Zoning application~
C.. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible
with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely
change the essential character of the same area;
See Findi.ngs "D" and. "E" under the Almexation al1d Zonillg ap:plicatio.n.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies \vith all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other pro.perty in the vici.nity;
See Finding "F" under the Anl1exation and Zon:il1g applicatiol1.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities
and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for
the establishment of proposed conditional use sh.al) be able to provide
adequately any such services;
See Finding "G" under tIle Annexation and Zoning applicatiol1~
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at
Hacienda Subdivision (CUP-04-052) ~ .Exh.ibit H - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Dec.ision and
Order
page 1 of2
t
t
(.<.::n.. .
pubUc cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community;
See :Filldillg "H" under tIle Annexation and Zoning ap.plication and Finding "D"
under the Prelimillary Plat application.
G. That the proposed use ,viII not .involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that w.ill be detrimental to any
persons, property, or general \velfare by reason of excessive production of
trafflc, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
See Finding "I" under the Annexation and ZOlling application.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular app.roaches to the property which
shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on
surrounding public streets;
See Fil1dings "1" al1d "J" under the Annexation and. Zoning application.
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, Joss or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
See Fil1ding "K" under the AlIDexation and Zoning ap.plicatio.n.
Hacienda Subdiv.ision (CUP-04-052) - Exhibit H - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
.Page 2 of2
(:
t.'....
\~ . .
....... .
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Jayo Construction
P P 04-034
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO ~
5-G
REQUEST Findings for Approval- Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 98 building lots and
27 common lots on 19 .63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for Hacienda Subdivision - 6000 North
Meridian Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: 5Mu...Y'- J.~~ Date:: 3! iLl I () S Phone:
EmaHed: ,<;ha.{J(\ f.O~ fQ<'1 ol-eO(\s(}-.\+a.J\-ks, ()e.;+ Staff Initials: tR....
,
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridlan~
See attached Findings
~
to 0 0
\. 0
<:...-m. .
CITY 0 F MERIDIAN &0S3Fk1~..1I:.1t.~11~~<&:tla
DECISION & ORDER
In the matter of a request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from R.UT to R-8 zone
AND Preliminary Plat approval of ninety-six (96) single-family residential and tlventy-eight
(28) common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone AND Conditional Use Permit
approval for a Planned Development for a Residential Subdivision with Reduced Lot
Frontages, Reduced Lot Sizes, and Zero .Lot Lines, including Clubhouse and Swimming
Pool for Hacienda Subdivision, by Doug Jayo.
Case No(s): AZ-04-034, .PP-04-043, CUP-04-052
For the City Council Hearing Date(s) of: .February 15 and March 1, 2005
A. Filldings of Fact
1 ~ Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a p.u.blic hearing was publislled for two (2) consecutive weeks .prior to
t11e City Council public hearing, the first publication appeari.ng and writte.n notice
luailed to .pro.perty owners or purcllasers of record within three .hundred feet (300')
of the external boul1daries of the property. The notice of public l1earing before the
City Council was posted u.pon the .property under co:nsideration more tllan one week
before said llearing. All otller noticil1g was done consistel1t with Idaho Code 967-
6509~
TIle Inatter was duly considered .by the City Council at tIle Fe.bruary 15, 2005 and
continued to the March 1, 2005, .public hearing(s). TIle applical1t, affected property
owners, and govelTIlnent subdivisions providing services wi.thin t11e plalU1ing
jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were given full oppo.rtunity to express
COlTIlnents al1d su.bmit evide.nce.
.b. Written and oral testiluony was received on this Inatter, as reflected ill the records
of the City Clerk (for written testiluony) and. ill tIle official meeting Ininutes (for
oral testilTIOny).
c~ The PlalUling and Zonil1g Commission conducted a pu.blic llearing and issued a
written recommendatiol1 011 the subject Inatter to tIle City Council.
d. The City COUllcill1eard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered the
evidence and the record in this lnatter.
2. Process Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & OR.OER
CASE NO(S), AZ-04-034, PPR04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE ] Of 5
c. . '.
// .... ..
,.
l.....
a~ Tllere has been compliance with all notice and l1earing requireluents set forth in
Idaho Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~~ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidel1ced by tile Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with tIle staff report.
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report an.d tIle
Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
verified that the .property owner(s) of record at tIle time of issuance oftllese
findings is Michael Adkins (sale pe.nding to Doug layo).
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Su.bdivision Ordinance
a. See Exhibit F (Atmexation and Zoning), Exhibit G (Preliminary Plat) and .Exhibit H
(Conditional Use Permit) for tile findings required for this application.
B. COllclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridial1 shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local .Land
Use PlalUl.ing Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idallo Code (I.C. g67-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Develo.prnent Ordinal1ces codified at Titles II and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zonil1g Inaps thereot: The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, establi.slled tIle
Im.pact Area and the Alnended COluprehensive Pla.n of tIle City of Meridian, which was
adopted A.ugust 6,2002, Resolution. No~ 02-382 and Maps.
3. TIle co.nditions shall be reviewa.ble by the City Council.pursuant to Meridian City Code
~ 11-17 -9.
4. Due consid.eration has beel1 given to tIle COlTIlnent(s) received froIn tIle govenunental
subdivisions providing services in. tIle City of Meridian plal1Jling jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
ilnpose expense upon the public if tIle attaclled conditions of approval are imposed.
6. Tllat tIle City has granted all order of approval in accordance with tllis Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and. then a copy served by tIle Clerk .UpOl1
the applicallt, the Planning alld. Zoning Department, tIle Public Warks Departlnent and
any affected party requesting notice~
7. That this approval is subject to tIle Legal Descri.ption in Exhibit A, tIle Preliluil1ary Plat
in Exhibit B, and the Conditions of A:pproval in Exhibit C, D and E. The conditions are
co.ncluded to be reasonable and the applicant shalllneet su.ch requirelnents as a
condition of ap.proval of the application~
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). AZ~04M034; PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 2 Of 5
(.
{~.
c~ Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City COUI1Ci]'s authority as .provided in Meri.dian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based upon tIle above and foregoil1g Findings of Fact w:hich are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's Prelilninary Plat as evidenced by having sublnitted tIle Prelilninary Plat
dated February 17, 2005 (revision. #4)) is l1ereby conditionally approved; and
2~ The applicant's Conditional Use Permit/Planned .Unit Developtnent Site Plan as
evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan dated February 17, 2005 (revisio.n #4) is
hereby conditionally approved; and
2. The conditions of approval are as shown in Exhibits C, 0 and E.
D. Notice of Ap.plicable Tilne Limits (as applicable)
1. Notice of Twelve (12) MOlltll Preliluinary Plat .Duration
Please take 110tice tllat after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, the owner or
developer sllalI l1ave OIle year witlli.n Wl1icl1 to file the request for approval of tIle final
plat. After approval of final .plat, the owner or developer sIlaIl have one year to begin
construction of the :public .utilities and OIle year tl1ereafter to cOlnplete construction of
those public facilities. (MCC 12-2-4.B & C~)
2. N oti.ce of Eighteen (18) MontIl Conditional U.se Permit Duration
Please take notice tllat the conditional use pennit shall be valid for a maximulD period
of eigl1teen (18) months unless otherwise approved by tIle council. During this tiln.e,
the pennit holder lTIUst COlUlnel1ce the use as pennitted in accordance with the
conditions of ap.provaI, satisfy the requirelnents set fort11 in the conditions of ap.proval,
acquire building pennits and COlnmence construction of perlnanent footings or
structures on or in the ground~ In this C0.11text "structures" shall include sewer al1d
water lines, streets or building construction. The applical1t has specified in the
application and to tile cOlnmission and council a construction schedule and cOlTI.pletion
date for the project~ Ift]le completion. date specified for the :project is exceeded, the
conditional .use application shall become null and. void~ However, the applicant Inay
sub.lnit an application for a time extension on the :project for city council review. TIle
ap.plication for time extension shall be submitted. at least thirty (30) days prior to the
deadline for cOID.pletioll of tIle project For .projects requirillg :platting, the final plat
must be recorded within tllis eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple
phases, the eighteen (18) montll deadline shall ~pply to tIle first pllase~ In the event that
the development is made in successive contiguous segtnents or luultiple pllases, such
p.hases shall.be constructed within successive intervals of OIle year [fOlTI the origillal
date of approval by the COUI1Cil. If the successive phases are .not submitted within o.ne
year intervals, the co.nditional appro.val of the future phases s.hall be null and void.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 3 Of 5
(
/---:=.:....... .
{ : .
\~...... .
(.MCC 11-17-4.B.)
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings AJlalysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that p.ursual1t to Idaho Code 67-8003, tIle Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request .must be in writing, and must .be filed
with tIle City Clerk not lTIOre than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision
concernil1g the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll tIle
time period within whicl1 a Petition for Judicial Review Inay be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the goveluing .bod.y of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected .person .being a person WIlD has
an il1terest in real property whiclllnay be adversely affected .by the issuance or dell1aI of
tIle conditional use permit approval :may withill twenty-eight (28) days after tIle date of
this decision and ord.er seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idallo
Code.
F. .Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal :Oescription
Exhibit B: Approved .Prelilninary Plat
Exhibit C: Annexati0 ll. and Zoning COlnments
Exhibit 0: Prelilninary Plat COllditions of Approval
Exhibit E: Conditional Use Permit COl1ditions of Approval
Exllibit F: Almexation & Z011ing Fil1dings
Ex.hibit G: Preliluinary Plat Findings
Exllibit H: Conditional Use Permit Findings
By action of the City Co.uncil at its regular Ineeting held 011 tIle
111 (//LC/f,_/ ,2005.
15~
day of
COUNCIL MEM.B:ER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S)> AZ-04M034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 4 Of 5
c. ..
/'. .
'j:\.~~.
:MA YOR T AM.MY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
Attest:
and. City Attorney.
Dated: 3.-\ ~ ~r
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & O.RDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 5 Of 5
(
(<.<<<,u.
EXHIBIT A
n.acienda Subdivision
AZ-04-034
Legal Description
Ann exatio n Bo u "clary Osee ription
For
Jayo Company
A parcel fa r annexation purposes located in Government lots 1 and 2 in the NW 11.1 of
Section 30~ TovmshJp 4 Northt Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada Counly~ Idaho~ more
particu tady described as foHows;
Commencing at a brass cap monument marking the southlNest corner of said NW X
(1,4 comer)1 from which a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the northwest corner of said
Government Lot 2 bears N 0002.03~t W a distance of 1330~58 feet;
Thence N 0002'03~ W along the westerly boundary of said NW % a distance of 796.14
feet to the PO I NT OF B EGI NN ING;
Thence continuing atong said westerly boundary N OQ02t03t~ W a distance of 534.44 feet
to a 5/8 inch d iameter iran pin 1
Thence continuing along said westerly boundary N 0001'3011 Wa distance of 261 ~12 feet
to a point;
Thence leaving said westerly boundary N 89~401431} E a distance of 1100.65 feet to a
5/8 inch diameter iron pi n;
Thence S 0002.36~ W along the easterly boundary of said Government Lots 1 and 2 a
distance of 795.12 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin~
Thence leaving said easterly boundary S 89D39.20rF W a distance of 1099.61 feet to the
POlNT OF BEGINNJNG~
This parcel contains 20.09 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use.
Clinton w~ Hansen~ PLS
La I~Jd Solutions! PC
November 8~ 2004
';.\i.::X. (1, ~~). .;} D~V~
,.. I\t\ pu6\..\C,
t,e.fUtl\ '.IS o"E.P1.
~ ~JOR''''
(.. ..
. .
l<~. ..
\..:.. ..
EXHIBIT B
Hacienda Subdivision
(PP-04-043, CUP-04-052)
Approved Preliminary Plat/Site Plan
.... .._. .-."'"" .... ..: ~ i' 1..
i. -'.f I. r
:~ ...::.<" ~. i1 ~ :WTt:
tj
Hr
.r!
.. ~:::
'ji 1',~.L, l'~" .'~' .\. i. '< I ' 1....,..--..-,., <"---"+,< n_u~~ . q~ '< ~f. ~"' · ", ~i, -.if.~ ~ J ~ I k <, tf''t l~;" ;""" <-;-
1
f
I
..::: ~~.;- t"~ :.;.: ~ ,.:::")
~<?:\ f :'~~:~: t t
(
(. .
\.
EXHIBIT C
Atmexation alld Zoning Application
Haciellda Subdivision. AZ-04-034
ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal descriptioll su.brnitted with tIle application (stalnped by Clinton W. Hansen on 11-
08-04) appears to meet tIle requirements of tIle City of Meridian and State Tax COIUluission
and places the .parcel co.ntiguous to existil1g city limits.
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within this project will l1ave to be
relnoved fr01D tlleir domestic service, per City Ordinan.ce Section 5-7 -517, when services are
available frOlTI the City of Meridian~ Wells :may be used for non-dOlnestic purposes such as
landscape irrigation.
3. All irrigatiol1 ditc.hes, laterals or canals~ exclusive of l1atural waterways, intersecting, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to tIle .parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13.
Plans will need to be approved by the ap.propriate irrigation/drainage distlict, or lateral users
association (ditch owners), with writte.n approval or non-approval sublnitted to the Public
Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be
reviewed and approved by tIle Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
4. Any future subdivision, planned developtnent, uses and constructio.n sllal1 cOlnply witll the
City of Meridian ordinances ill effect at the tilne.
(-
f~.".'. .
\v...:.... ..
EXHIBIT D
Conditions of Approval
Preliminary Plat
Hacienda Subdivision
(File PP-04-043)
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS-PRELIMIN.ARY .PLAT
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall.be via Inain :liJle extellsions frOID the Nortll SIougll
Trunk that is currently in the design stage by the City of Meridian. T.he applicant will be
responsible for constructing the lateral sewer and water lnains to and through this
proposed development, thereby making thetTI available to adjacent pro.perties. The
subdivision designer is responsible for coordinating lTI.ain sizing and routin.g with the
Public Works Departlnent This developlnent sIlal] be subject to latecolner fees, to
reim.burse those res.ponsible for .bringing sanitary sewer service to the area, when alld. if
the Latecomers Fee Agreement is established. Latecomer's fees shall be due and payable
prior to signature on tIle fil1al plat for each phase.
This proposed developlnent is currently not serviceable .by the City of.Meridian's san.itary
sewer systelu. Proceedil1g through the ap.proval process is str.ictly t11e risk of tIle
applicant. The City of Meridian does .not guarantee sewer service with.il1 the
developluent time frames outlined in Meridian City Ordinal1ce.
2. Water service to tllis site shall be via a 16-inch olain line extensiOll froln a Inain currel1tly
being designed by tIle City of Me.ridian~ The City's project will extend water service .u.P
N. Meridial1 Road to .McMillall~ The applicant will be respol1sible for constructing tIle
16-inch dialneter water Inains to tIle Inid-section. line, and a 12-inch .lnain to the north
boundary line extellded in Meridian Road. All other Inains tllfough tllis proposed
developUlel1t shall be 8-illCh diameter. TIle subdivision designer is responsible for
coordinating :main sizing and routing with tIle Public Works Departlnent~ This
developtnent shall be subject to latecolner fees, to reimburse tllose responsible for
bringing water service to tIle area, wIlen alld if the Lateco.tners Fee Agreelnent is
established. Latecolner's fees shall be due and .paya.bIe .prior to signature on tIle final plat
for eacll :phase~
3~ The applicant has not indicated who will own and lnaintai11 the pressurized irrigatiol1
system witllin tl1is developlnent. If the systelTI relnal11s pr.ivate, plal1s and specifications
811al1 be reviewed by the Public Warks Departl11ellt as pal1 of tIle developlnent plan
review process~ A draft copy of tIle pressurized .in-igation systeJTI O&M lnallual must be
su.blnitted prior to plan approval, and the applicant shall be subject to irrigation .plan
review fees. Underground year-rou.nd pressurized irrigatio.n Inust .be provided to all lots
within this development. TIle City of Melidian requires tllat pressulized in-igation
systelTIS be supplied by a year-round source of water. Applicant shall be required to
utilize any existing surface or well water for the .prilnary source. If a surface or well
source :is not available, a single-point co.nnection to the culinary water systeln shall be
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - .Exhibit D
page 1 of6
(
(<;-.
required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the
payment of asseSSlne.nts for the COlnmon areas prior to signature on the fil1al plat by the
Meridian City Engineer.
4. If the request is approved by the irrigation district, for all unpiped (o.pen) sections of tIle
North Slough Lateral, slopes shall not be steeper than 4: 1. A "typical" detail of the cross-
section of these sections shall be subtnitted to the P&Z De.partment for approval witll the
final plat landscape plan. The City Council supports the applicant's intention to not pipe
the North Slough Lateral.
5A Prior to City Council approval of tIle fi.nal plat, the applicant shall sublnit a w:nttel1
statelnellt from Settlers Irrigatio.n District (SID) to the P&Z Departluent clarifying the
required easelnent widtll for the NOlill Slough drain. Ap.plicant shall meet tIle conditions
of SID.
6. TIle plat sllalI show Rio Colinas Street as a 36-foot street section.
7. Graphically depict COllliUOl1 d.riveway locations for the townhouse lots in Blocks 6 al1d 7.
8. The cOl1ceptual landscape plan submitted with the prelilninary plat (S.heets PPL-C al1d
PPL-l, dated 11/03/04 by The :Land Group) is approved with tJle following changes:
a. Revise Sheet PPL-I to show tIle landscape island in Rio Coli.nas.
.b. .Revise Sheet PPL-I to relnove the fence currently s110wn e.ncroaching 011 Lot 18,
Block 4.
c. No trees will be allowed within sanitary sewer or irrigation easements, except as
ap.proved tlrroug.h a s~parate Licellse Agreement. Re.locate any trees Sl10W within
easements to other locations witllin the developlnent
d. The applicallt sllall attelll.pt to obtail1 a Licellse Agreelnent with SID to plant trees
within tlle Nort11 SIong!l Lateral easelnel1t for Lot 20, Block 6, Lot 1, Block 5,
Lots 1 and 12, Block 4 and Lot 1, Block 3. If unsuccessful, the applicant shall
Initlgate for the required llumber of trees witllin these COllliUon areas (1 :8,000 sq.
ft) within the subd-ivision. At a Ininimum, .non.-illvasive root shru.bs shall be
provided witllin tllese areas, as .permitted by SID.
9. Unless otherwise waived by tIle City Council, all irrigation ditc.hes, laterals or canals
il1tersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per
MCC 12-4-13. Plails will l1eed to be approved by Settlers Inigation District, or lateral
users association (ditcl1 oWl1ers), witll written approval or nOll-ap.proval subluitted to tIle
Public Works Departlnel1t. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans
will be reviewed an.d approved by tIle Meridial1 City Engineer prior to final plat
signature.
Meridial1 City Code 12-4-13-8 requires that t.iled d.itches have a sloped bar-grated inlet
structure and access/cleanout boxes at a InaxitTIUlTI of four hundred foot (400') spacing
and at all angle points of tIle .pipelille. The applicant sIlall address the access to each of
tl1ese required structures, as saIne will fall witllin the back yard of several lots.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit.O
.Page 2 Of 6
c..
(.
\
10. Ap.pIicant shall construct a minilTIUlll 5-foot wid.e, detached sidewalk alol1g the entire
subdivision frontage of Meridian Road and adjacent to the designated collector road.ways.
Coordinate sidewalk locatiol1 wit11 ACHD~
11. All areas being co.unted toward the 1 0% open space alne.nity shall be free of "wet ponds"
or otller such nuisances. All stonnwater detention facilities incorporated into the required
open space are subject to MCC 12-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass alld
trees, as de.picted on the submitted lalldsc~pe plans. Any ACHD-required access
driveways to serve stormwater areas tl1at are located witllin required o.pen space lots sIlall
be shown on. the detailed landscape plans with each final plat.
12~ Applicant sllaII construct 6-foot vinyl, perimeter fellcillg, unless otherwise approved .by
the Zoning Adlninistrator.
STANDARD PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS
1" Please submit a copy of the Ada COUl1ty Street NalTIe COffilnittee's approval letter for the
subdivision name, and tIle lot and block nUlnbering. Make any corrections necessary to
confonn.
2~ Coordinate fire hydrallt .placelnent with the City of Meridial1 Public Warks Departlnent.
3 · A letter of credit or cash surety in tIle amOullt of 11 0% will be required for all fencing,
lal1dscaping, play equiplnent, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc.., prior to
sigl1ature on the fillal plat.
4. All tuicro.paths witl1in tIle :proposed subdivisiol1 sllall .be designed in accordallce with
M CC 12- I 3 -15 "Mi cropatll Landscaping".
5. A d.etailed landscape plan, itl cOlnpliance with the landscape ordinance sllall be sublnitted
for tIle subdivision with tIle fillal plat applicatioll, tIle landscape .plan shall include th.e
location al1d design of allY proposed playground equipln.el1t
6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivisio.n sIlall be built in accordance with MCC12-13-
1 0-8.
7. 250 and 100-watt, high-pressure sodiulTI streetligl1ts will be required at locatiol1S
designated by the Public Works Departluent All streetligllts shall be installed at
subdivider's expel1se. Typical locatiol1S are at street il1tersections and/or fire l1ydral1ts.
Final design locations alld quantity are d.etennined after power designs are cOlTI.pleted by
Idaho Power CompallY. The street light contractor shall obtain desigtl and pel1nit frOlTI
tIle Public Works Depal1ment prior comlnencing installations.
8. Please sublnit U.P to date grou.ndwater/soils Inollitoring data to the Public Works
Department for review.. AllY drainage areas (detentionlretentiol1 basins) lTIUst be designed
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 3 of6
t:~-/.". .. ..
t\:.... .
to ensure that water will percolate within a period of tilne not to exceed 24 hours for all
storms up to al1d including a 1 DO-year storm event. Side sIo.pes witl1io. drainage areas
shall not exceed 3: 1.
9. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inclles of trees tl1at
were removed. Required landscaping trees will 110t be considered as replacelnent trees for
those trees that have to be relTIoved.
10. Developer sIlall coordinate Inailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
11. AllY existing dOlnestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within. this project will have to be
relnoved from tl1eir dOlnestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
Inay be .used for 11on-dolnestic purposes sucl1 as landscape irr.igation.
12. COlnpaction test results luust be subtnitted to the Meridian B.uilding Departlnent for all
building :pads receiving engineered backfill, w.here footillg would sit atop fill materiaL
13. Applicallt's engineer will be required to SUbluit a signed, stalnped statement cel1ifying
that all street finish centerlille elevations are set a minimUlTI of three feet above tIle
highest establislled nonn.al groundwater elevation.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The existing residence (future clubhouse) shall be brought 'U.P to "Assembly" occupancy and
comply with the IFC.
2. No parki11g is allowed witllin allY of tIle "knuckle" areas of the plat.
3 ~ All roofing materials on the attac.hed dwelling units shall be a non-combustible material.
4. One and two falnily dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallol1s per minute available
for d.uration of211ours to service the entire project. Fire 11ydrants slla!l be placed an average
of 400' apart. Intenlatiol1al Fire Code Appendix D
5. Acceptance of t]le water supply for fire protection will be by tIle .Meridia11 Water
Depalilnellt.
6. .Fillal A.pproval of the .fire hydrant locations s:hall be by the Meridian Fire Departlnent.
a. Fire Hydrants sIlall have the 4 ~" outlet face the Inain street or parkil1g lot aisle.
b. The Fire h.ydrant shall not face a street Wllich does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant luarkers sl1all be provided per Public Works speCA
d~ Locatiol1S with fire hydrants s.halI llave the curb painted red 10' to each side of tIle
hydrallt locatio11.
e. Fire Hydratlts shall be placed on corners~
f~ Fire l1ydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 1 0' ~
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 4 of6
( .
~~...-. :
{
\~ :. .
7. The .phasing .plan Inay req.uire that any roadway greater than 150' in length
that is not provided with an o.utlet s.hall be required to have an approved turn around4
8. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of28' inside and
48' outsid.e radius.
9. Insure that all yet undeveloped .parcels are tnaintained free of combustible vegetatiol1.
1 O. O.peratiollal fire hydrants and temporary or permane.nt street signs are req.uired before
cOlnbustible construction begins4
11.. To increase elnergency access to tIle site a luil1illlUlll of two points of access will be required
for any portion of the project, whie11 serves more t11an 50 homes. The applical1t sIlall
.provide a stub street to the property to the (westJeast/north/sout11). The two e.ntrances shall
be separated b.y no less than Y1 the diagonallneasUretnent of the project.
12. :8uildiIlg setbacks s.hall .be per the Building Code for one al1d two story C011structio.n.
13. The roadways shall be .b.uilt to Ada County Higllway Standards and s.hall have a clear
driving surface, available at all tilnes, whicll is 20' wide. Streets with less than a 29'
street widtll shallllave no parking. Streets with less thall 33' shall have parkillg only on
on e si de.
14. Maintain a separation of 5' froIn the building to the du.mpster enclosure.
15. All portions oftlle buildings located on tllis project must .be witl1in 150' of a paved surface
as lueasured arou.nd the pelilneter of the building.
16. All cOlrunon driveways s11all be straigllt or l1ave a tun ling radius of 28' inside alld 48'
outside and s]lall have a clear driving sUlface which is 20' wide.
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. TIle pedestrian access to the proposed clubhouse/coIDtTIunity el1trance is not well-defi.ned.
TIle ap.plicant shall submit a revised. landscape .plall tllat .uses walkway paving InateriaIs
al1d landscaping to alet11notorists to the .pedestlian traffic.
2.. The proposed landscaping creates a hidillg spot near alld south of Lot 20, Block 5 and Lot
24, Blocl( 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan tl1at affords greater
visibility of the area frOlTI public areas suell as a street or parking lot.
3. Any interior fencing shall allow visibility froIn tIle street or sIlal1 not exceed four feet ill
l1eight if solid fencing is usee} (pertaining to Lot 1, Block 5).
PARKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard esta.blislled in the City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance (M CC 12-13 -13 -6) will be fallowed.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - .Exhib.it D
page 5 of6
(..
(..
~\~.:. .
2. Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: TIle standard
established ill the City of Meridian Landscape Ordi.nance (MCC 12-13-13) will be
followed.
SANITARY SERVICES CO. CONDITIONS
1 ~ Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your pro.posal a.nd
sublnit stalnped (approved) plans with your Cel1ificate of Zoning COlnpliance
app Ii cation.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 ~ Exhibit D
page 6 of6
c. .
(\
EXHIBIT E
Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (Conditional.Use Permit)
1. Applicant shaIllueet all of the requirelnents of the preliminary :plat as a conditiol1 of the
Conditional .Use Permit.
2. A condition of tIle CUP/PD sllall be th.at the a.pplicallt participates ill any road
infrastructure agreelnents in the North Meridian Plal1ning Area .negotiated with ACHD
al1d s.hall faithfully perfonn tIle terms of suc.h agreeme.nt or agreements.
3. A :minilTIUlU 10-foot setback froIn the Rio Vista Drive rigllt-of-way is required for the
existing wall on Lot 1, Block 5. Pri.or to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning COlnpliallce
for th.e clubhouse lot, the applical1t shall Ineet with the Meridian Police Chief or l1is
designee on site to determine the proper lighting, fence l1eigl1t, gates and surveillal1ce
monitoring around. the club.house. SUbluit written approval of said Police .Departmellt
approval witll the Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance for tIle clu.bhouse.
4. All developmel1t shall cOlnply with tIle Alnericans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act, including the COffilTIUn:ity clubllouse.
5. The applicant s.hall provid.e/construct the following alnenities within the subdivisiol1:
a. Over 1 0% of the gross area as open. space; al1d
b. A COlTI1TIUnity clubllouse with restrooms al1d a swirnlnil1g pool.
6. TIle following d.eviations from the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (MCC Title 11 al1d
12) are ap.proved as .part of tllis applicatioll:
Mill. Lot Size- City Requirelnent (R-8)
6,500 sq. ft per lot
Approved Lot Size
2,850 sq. ft per lot (attaclled units
only)
Lot Frontage- City Requiretnent
65' Ini11ilnum
Approved Minilu.ulTI Frontage
32' Ininiln.ulll
Zero
.Lot Lines-
City Requireluent
1 per lot (lnax.)
Approved Standard
2 per lot
Hacienda Subdivision - CUP-04-052 - Exhibit E
page 1 of2
(.
. .
7. All areas bein.g counted toward tIle 10% open space amellity shall be free of 4l;wet ponds"
or other SUCll nuisa.nces. All stonnwater detention facilities incorporated into the required
ope.n space are subject to MCC 12-13-14 and sllall .be fully vegetated with grass and
trees, as depicted on the sublnitted landscape plans.
8. A Certificate of Z011ing Com..pliance lTIUst be obtail1ed for tIle clubhouse al1d SWilTIlning
pool prior to ap.plying for .b.uilding permits.
9~ Townllouse Elevations: A .varied color and/or building Inaterial sc.heme is required for the
townhome structures witllill tIle subdivisiol1. Applica.nt shall o.btain .written approval from
the P&Z Departlnent for said. sclleme Plior to City E.ngineer signature of the final plat
Hacienda Subdivision ~ CUP-04-052 ~ Exhibit E
page 2 of2
(. ..
(c-.n. .
EXHIBIT F
Annexation and Zoning Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File AZ-04-034)
The City COUI1CiI 11ereby ap.proves the following analysis of required findings bv staff:
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, Ge.neral Standards Applicable to Zoning
Amendments, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required Uto review the
particular facts and cirCllmstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms o.f the
following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions
about the proposed zoning amendment. H
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, .if not, has there been an applicatio.n for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designatiol1, R-8, is ha11TIOnious with and in
accordance with th.e 2002 COlnprellensive Plall and Future Land Use Map, which
designates the Ian.d to be MediuIU :Oensity ResidentiaL Tllere is a mi.nimum target
density of three (3) du/acre in the COlnprehensive Plan and Hacienda's gross
density is 4.99 du/acre. The Future Lal1d Use Map SllOWS a potential public park
site, regional pathway, and future school site in this section~ A lO-foot wide
regional path was recently ap.proved in Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
Subdivisions to the south and east Also, Joint School District No. 2 has
purchased a 41 acre site in tIle section (two parcels to the south) al1d they are not
pursuing allY furt.h.er land acquisitions ill Section 30 at this tilue (according to
Wend.ell Bigham, Facilities Director). P&Z Departll1ent staff is not aware of any
efforts tIle Meridian Parks & Recreation Department is undel1aking to acquire
land witllin tllis sectio.ll for a public park.
The Comprehensive Plan COl1tail1S :policies Wllicll encourage developmellt to be
phased in accordance witll their cOl1nectiol1 to the sewer systelTI (see policy #8,
page 108) and silnilar policies aimed at controllillg growth. The parcel is :planned
to be served with the North South Trunk, which is 110t yet constructed to Melidian
Road. TIle Public Works Departlnellt has been coordinating with .property OW.fiers
to the west and soutl1 o.n the extension and alignment of the trunk line. Parmllount
Subdivision is cUITelltly COl1structing the sanitary sewer and will stub to Meridian
Road.
.Below are some of tIle 2002 CO"lnprehensive Plall policies which generally
SUPPOlt the amlexatiol1 request (Staff analysi.s is show.n in italics). The application
also lists several otller policies Wl1ich support the annexatiol1:
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of La\v & Decision and
Order
page 1 of5
c.. .
(
:......
· "PrOlTIote the design of attractive roadway entryway areas throughout
Melidian that will clearly identify tIle community." (Ch~ V, Goal III, Obj.
B. #7)
Hacienda Sllbdivision is proposing a 35-foot wide landscape buffer lot on
Meridian .Road ltllith a substantial amOllnt of new landscaping and
hardscaping therein.
· "New develoPlnent s.hould not rely 011 cul-de-sacs sil1ce they .provide .poor
fire access, walkability and neigl1borhood social life~ New developtne.nt
and streets should be designed to encourage walking and bicycling." (ell.
VI, Bullet #2, pg. 71)
There are no new cul-de-sacs planned within the development.
· "Coordinate with irrigatio.n districts to provide multiple use of existillg
irrigation easements~" (Ch~ VII, Goal III, Obj. .B, #3)
The a,pplicant is proposing a pathway facility adjacent to the North Slough
Lateral throllgh the majority of the project~ They are also .proposing to
k;eep the facility open as an amenity to the Sllbdivision, which staff
supports~
· "Require usable opell space to be inco1]Jorated into new residential
subdivision plats." (Ch. VII, Goal IV, Obj. C, #3)
B6 Is the area included in the zo.ning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
Staff does ll0t anticipate tllat the applicant intends to rezone the subject property
in the future~ Tllis is 011ly the fourtll urban-scale development and. annexation
application in Section 30, T4N, Rl E~ U.POll extension of tIle NOlih Slough Trunk
into this square tuile, additional reZOlle requests are anticipated.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
res.idential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff fillds th.at the pro.posed single faln.ily residential subdivision would be
allowed within the requested zoning district of R-8, with a Planned Develo:plnel1t
to allow the redu.ced frontages, reduced lot sizes and zero lot lil1es.
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area s.hould be rezoned. For example, have the streets been lvidened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exh.ibit F - Findings of Fact Conclus.ions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 Of 5
(. ..
t.
\~-:-~~
in a fashion similar to the .proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that the lan.d to the east and south has beell recently allnexed and
approved for single-faluily residential lots itl Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
Subdivisions. Saguaro Canyon has a gross density of 3.29 d.u./acre. ParalTIOunt
Subdivision was annexed. .in 2003 and. land immediately west of Vent ana is zoned
for professional office and sil1g1e falnily uses. Larkwood Subdivision east of
Saguaro ]las lot sizes tllat rull approximately 2 acres eac.h. The proposed
density--4.99 d.u./acre gross-is 11igher than botll Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
yet is within the allowable 3-8 units per acre targeted by tIle COlnprellensive Plan.
Th.us staff fillds that sun.ounding developluents are mixed densities-either tIle
saIne or less, but the proposed del1sity is within the anticipated range for a
Inedium density project. ACHD has also reviewed the adjacent street capacity
and has approved the proposed subdivisioll (witll COllditions).
Meridian Road (betweell Chindel1 and McMillan) is n.ot programlned within
ACHD's .Five Year Work Program. McMilla11 Road is in ACHD's Capital
Ilnprovement ProgralTI and is anticipated to .be reconstructed in 2018. Tlle
property is designed to sewer il1tO a POrtiOll of tIle North Slough Trunk t11at is not
yet constructed.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be har.monious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intend.ed
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed sil1g1e faluily residential use will change the existil1g
rural character of tIle subject .property. Tllere is an estate-type property soutI1 of
Hacienda Subdivisio.n~ However, accordi.ng to public testimollY issued at tIle
Velltana Subdivision City Council hearings, the owner is ex.pected to redevelop in
tIle near future. Tile illtended cllaracter of the vicinity is a Inix of .urban and
s.ub.urbal1 scale developlnel1ts on a generally gridded street system with a focus on
single faluily and lTIulti-family housing at 3 to 8 d.u./acre. The proposed use is
cOlnpatible with the Future Land Use Map. Tile design and del1sity confonns to
lllost of the COlnprehensive Plan policies~
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
TIle COffiluission and Cou,ncil sllould rely on public testimony (oral atld written)
to determil1e wh.etl1er or .not the proposed uses will be disturbing or l1azardo.us to
the existing or future neigllbori.ng uses.
Staff does not anticipate tllat tIle proposed resident.ial .uses will be l1azardous.
However~ staff fillds tllat tIle new residen.ces Inay be disruptive to existing
agl; cuI tural .practices to the no:rtll~ It sllould .be 11oted, .however, that the
.Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 3 of5
(
(:. ..
. .
COlnmission and CO.UllCil made this finding in the affinnative dun.ng the Saguaro
Canyon al1d Ventana Subdivision l1earings for the saIne .rural p:ropert.ies~
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential pub.lic facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, se\ver or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the pro.perty to be annexed will or can .be served adequately by
lTIOst essential public facilities and services if all conditions of ap.proval are Inet
by the applicant Tlle a:pplicant sllall be required to extend sanitary sewer and
water mains to and through tIle proposed d.evelopment, thereby making tllelTI
availa.ble to tIle adjacent .properties. TIle applicant and/or future .property OWllers
will be required to pay.parl( and highway ilnpact fees as well as construct on-site
stonnwater drainage facilities.
Please review ACHD, Police and tIle Fire De.partInent's comlnents concemillg
this su.bdivision for further infonnation regarding public services and. facilities.
.R. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be excessive additiol1al requirelnellts at public cost
for public services and facilities, if the applicant cOlnplies with tIle COl1ditions of
approval for tIle accompanyil1g conditional use .pe11nit and preliluinary plat
applicati ons.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff recognizes tl1at traffic and noise will increase significantly upon. build-out of
the proposed su.bdivisioll. TIle COlnnlissio.n and COUI1Cil sllould refer to the
ACHD staff report for s.pecific d.etails on traffic im.pacts. The traffic ellgi.neer for
Ventana Su.bdivisiol1 detennined that, eve.n at project build-out in 2009, Meridian
Road will function at an LOS C or better. Staff does n.ot feel that tIle alTIOunt
generated will be d.etrilne.ntal to the public welfare if all City and ACHD
conditions of approval are Inet.
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not involve uses tllat would create
other nuisallces tllat would be detriluental to tIle general welfare of the
su.rroul1ding area~
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) ~ .Exll.ibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 4 oE5
( .
(.'.... .
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property \vhich shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on sur.rounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the subdivision's two ve11icular approaches off of Meridian Road
are aligned witll existing property lines on the west side of Meridian Road and
comply with the turn lane and intersection control co.nditions iUlposed by ACHD.
TIle other proposed roadways will need to be improved in compliance with
ACHD requirelnel1ts in order to alleviate interferel1ce witll the existing an.d
proposed intersections. We do find t11at, as proposed, the Rio Colinas Street stub
to the east is shown as a 32-foot wide street section. The standard public street
section is 36 feet. U:pon future redeveloplnellt of the .parcel in Blythe Estates
Subdivision (to east), this four (4) foot discrepancy may create an interference
w.itll future traffic. Staff is recomme.11ding this street be designed to a standard 36-
foot section ill this area.
The COlll1uission and Council should review ACHD COlnments cOl1cemil1g
vel1ieular approaches al1d. traffic generatio.n. The ACHD Comlnissio:n 11as
ap.proved the Hacienda Subdivisiol1 preliminary plat application.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds that 110 l1atural or scenic features of luajor ilnportance will be lost or
damaged by approving the annexat.ion al1d re-ZQtle. The North Slough does .bisect
tIle .propetiy alld is .proposed to be piped underground for S110rt segments tluoug11
the project. However, this facility is 110t considered to be a feature of "major
ilnportal1ce" for tile COffitTIunity. Any existil1g trees larger than 4" caliper tl1at are
relTIoved shall be Initigated for~ per tIle Landsca.pe Ordinance.
L. Is the .proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Mer.idian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
Staff finds that sewer, water, irrigation, solid waste, library, fire and street
services are available to the site. Existing elelnentary school capacity remains an
ilnportal1t b.ut Ul1detennined factor for this subdivision. The sellooI district has
stated in the .past (for other N.ortll Meridian developments) that additional studel1ts
will ful1her cOlnpound. the current overcrowded situatiol1 and residents cannot be
assured of attending tIle 11eigllborhood schooL Botl1 Havasu Creek and Paralllount
Subdivision .have been approved for new elelnelltary schools, altllo.ugll neither of
tllese sites has a COl1struction date at tIllS time.
Long-range planning in the North Meridian area .has bee.u underway since 2001.
This area is a part of the North Meridian Area Plan. The proposed use and
density generally conlply with this plan. Staff finds that the annexation of this
property is largely in the best interest of the City.
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & .Decision and
Order
page 5 Of 5
(... ..
("
EXHIBIT G
Preliminary Plat .Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File PP-04-043)
TIle City Cou.ncil hereby ~pproves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 0 read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a
proposed subdivision.. the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title
and at least the following.~
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive
Development .Plan;
Staff fillds the subdivision to be in substantial confollnal1ce with the
COlnprellensive P]al1, as noted in Find.ing "A" ul1der the Hacienda A11l1exation and
Zoning application.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
As noted .und.er Findings G and L of tIle Hacien.da Annexatio.n and Zoning
application, staff fi.nds tl1at all public services are available to acco.lnlTIodate the
proposed develop.ment
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital
improvement program;
The proposed subdivision would not create allY lTIOre additional requirelnents or
delnal1ds to the City tlla.n otller standard residential uses. The Public Works
Departlnent CIP includ.es the North Slough Trunk extensi011, whicl1 this pro.perty
will drain to. The developer will need to const.ruct off-site sewer and water
improvelne.nts in N. Meridian Road, in accordance witl1 tIle Master Facility Plal1.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that tIle d.evelopluellt will require public expenditures for extending tIle
Nortll Slough Trunk. Specifically, the Public Works must ellter into a contract
Wit}l a private firm to acquire easements, design and COl1struct the line. The
fundillg for this extensio.n is budgeted in tIle FY04 budget, with a .prelilnil1ary
Hacienda Subdivision (PP-04-043) - Exhibit G ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 1 of2
<.
(
estimated schedule of construction completion .by JUlle 2005.
e. Th.e other health, safety or environmental proble.ms that may be brought
to the Commission's attention.
Other than previously noted, staff does not find. any other health, safety or
envirOlunental problems associated witll tllis subdivision that need to be brought
to tIle Councilor COlTIlnission ' s attention.
Hacienda Subdiv.ision (PP-04-043) - Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 of2
t..
(~n'..
EXHIBIT H
Conditional Use Permit Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
The City COU11Cil hereby approves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
The Commission and COllncil shall review the .par/fell/ar facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditionalllse in terms of the following and may approve a conditional Lise
.permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (1 J-
17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accom.modate the proposed use and all yards,
open spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by
this ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property is large enougll to accomlnodate tIle requested
use and all other required features as noted above.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance \vith the requirements of
this Ordinance;
See Finding "A" u.nder the Armexation and Zoning application~
c. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible
with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely
change the essential character of the same area;
See FindiIlgs "D" and "E" .under the Anl1exat.ion and Zoning applicatio.n.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
See Finding "F" .under the Annexation and Zo.ning a.pplication.
E. That the proposed use \vilI be served adequately by essential public facilities
and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, ,vater, sewer or that the person responsible for
the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide
adequately any such services;
See Finditlg "GH .un.der the Annexation and Zoning application~
F. That the proposed use lvilI not create excessive additional requirements at
H:acienda Subdivision (CUP-04-052) - Exhibit H - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 1 of2
(
("
public cost for public facilities and services and ,viII not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community;
See Findi.ng "H" under the Annexation and Zoning application and Finding "D"
un.der the Prelilninary Plat application.
G~ That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
See Finding "I" under th.e Annexation and Zo.ning ap:plication.
H~ That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which
shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on
surrounding .public streets;
See Findings "I" and "J" under the AlU1exatiol1 and ZOlling application~
I. That the proposed use ,viII not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
See Finding "K" ull.def the Al1l1exation and Zoning application.
Hacienda Subdivision (CUP-04-052) - Exhibit H - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 of2
(,
('"
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT Jaya Construction
CUP 04-052
March 151 2005
ITEM NO.
5-H
REQUEST Findings for Approval- Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Dev..
for a residential subdivision in a proposed R-.8 zone for Hacienda Subdivision - 6000 North
Meridian Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATIORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANJT ARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEfTlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
Contacted: -5 L~ ~ Date: 3 / 1'-1/ Ob Phone:
Emailed: 5lt1.(J()...}(1 pp) l. o..nct~ Q..~L\-\c{ . S- l+et St~ff Initials: /J'(
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
See attached Findings
(
~..
(... .
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LA"l.~~"III~IIII.~il\~Ji:t
In ~e~atter ofa request~r~nnexation and ~oningof19.63 acres ~~~~.
AND Preliminary Plat approval of ninety-six (96) single-family residential and twenty-eight
(28) common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone AND Conditional Use Permit
approval for a :Planned Development for a Residential Subdivision with Reduced Lot
Frontages, .Reduced Lot Sizes, and Zero Lot Lines, including Clubhouse and Swimming
Pool for Hacienda Subdivision, by Doug Jayo.
Case No(s): AZ-04-034, .PP-04-043, CUP-04-052
For the City Council Hearing Date(s) of: February 15 and MarcIl 1, 2005
A~ Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public l1earillg was :published for two (2) consecutive weeks :prior to
tile City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and writtel1 notice
.lnailed to pro.perty oW.ners or :purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300')
of tIle external boundaries of the property. Tlle notice of public l1earing before tIle
City Cou.ncil was posted U:POl1 tIle property under COl1sideratio.n more than Olle week
before said l1earing. All ot11er noticing was done COl1sistent witll Idaho Code ~67-
6509~
TIle Inatter was duly considered by tIle City Council at tIle February 15,2005 al1d
continued to the March 1,2005, public hearing(s). TIle ap.pl:icant, affected .property
owners, and gove1111nent subdivisions providing services witllin the planning
jurisdictio.n of the City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express
COlTIlnents and su.blnit evidence.
b~ Written and oral testilTIOny was received on this Inatter, as reflected in tIle records
of tIle City Clerk (for written. testirllony) and in the officiallneetil1g minutes (for
oral testimony).
c~ TIle Planning and Zonil1g COlTIlnission conducted a p.ublic hearing and issued a
written. recoffilnendation on the subject luatter to the City CounciL
d. TIle City Council l1eard and took oral and written testitno.ny and duly considered the
evidence and the record ill this Inatter~
2. Process Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISI.ON & ORDER
CASE NO(S), AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, cur-04-052 - .PAGE 1 Of 5
(.
l"~..
\.~.:..... .
a. There has been co.mpliance with all notice and hearing requirelnents set forth in
Idallo Code S67 -6509, 6512~ and Meridian City Code ~ S 11-15-5 alld 11 Ro I 7 -5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of:Mailing, and the Affidavit of.Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report.
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In addition to the application and. property facts noted in tIle staff report and the
Planning & Zo.n.ing Recommendati.ol1 for the subject application(s), it is here.by
verified that tIle property owner(s) of record at tIle tilne of issuance of these
findil1gs is Mic.hael Adkins (sale .pending to Doug J ayo).
4. Required Findil1gs .per Zoning and Subdivisio.n Ordinance
a. See Exhibit F (Annexation al1d Zoning), Exllibit G (Prelilninary Plat) and Exhibit H
(Conditional Use :Permit) for the findings required for this application~
B.. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upo.n it by the "Local .Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I~C. ~67-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Co.uncil ta.kes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivisiol1 and
Developluent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zoning Inaps thereot: The City of Meridian 11as, by ordinance, establisl1ed tIle
Impact Area and the Amended Comprellensive Plan of the City of Meridian, whicl1 was
adopted August 6,2002, Resolution No~ 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council purSUatlt to Meridian City Code
9 11-17-9.
4. Due consideratiol1 has been given to tIle cOlnment(s) received fro:ln the govel11111ental
subdivisions providillg services in tIle City of Meridian :planl1il1g jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services req.uired by the proposed developtuent will 110t
i.lnpose expellse upon tIle public if tIle attached conditiol1S of approval are ilnposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of ap.proval ill accordance witl1 tllis Decisioll, which
shall be signed .by th.e Mayor and City Clerk and tllen a copy served .by the Clerk u.pon
the ap.plicant, the Planning and Zoning Departlnent, the Public Works Departlnent and
any affected party requesting notice.
7. Tl1at tl1is approval is subject to the Legal Descri:ption in. Exllibit A, th.e Preliminary Plat
in Exhibit B, and. the COllditions of A:pproval in Exhibit C, D and E. TIle conditiol1S are
concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet s.uch requirelnents as a
condition of approval of the a.pplication.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & O.RDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 2 Of 5
(
(.....
\.
c. Decision and Order
Pursuant to tIle City Council's authority as .provided in Meridian City Code S 12- 3 - 5 and
.based .UpOl1 tIle above and foregoing Filldings of Fact whicl1 are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's Preliluinary Plat as evidenced by having submitted the Prelitninary Plat
dated .February 17, 2005 (revisiol1 #4)) .is l1ereby conditionally approved; and
2~ The applicant's Conditional Use Pe.rmit/Planned Unit Developlnent Site Plan as
evidenced .by having sublnitted the Site Plan dated February 17, 2005 (revision #4) .is
hereby conditionally approved; and
2. The con.ditions of approval are as sllown i.n Exhibits C, D al1d E.
D. Notice of Applica.ble Time .Litnits (as applica.ble)
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Mo.nth Prelitninary Plat Duration
Please take notice that after tIle date of approval of the preliminary plat, tIle owner or
develo.per shall .have one year within which to file the req.uest for approval of the fillal
plat After approval of final plat, tIle QW.ner or developer sIlal] have one year to begin
construction. of the pu.blic utilities and one year thereafter to complete co.nstructiol1 of
those p.ublic facilities. (MCC 12-2~4.B & C.)
2. Notice of Eig.hteen (18) Month Con.ditional Use PerInit Duratio.n
P:lease take 110tice that the conditional use .pennit shall be valid for a Inaximum period
of eighteen (18) lTIonths unless otherwise approved by the council. .DUril1g tllis titne,
the pennit holder Inust COlnmence tIle use as pennitted in accordance with the
conditiol1S of approval, satisfy the requ.irelnellts set forth in the conditions of approval,
acquire .building .pennits and C01TIlne.nce construction ofpe11nanent footings or
sttuctures on or ill the ground. In this context "structures" s11alI include sewer and
water lines, streets or building constructiol1. The applicant has specified in tIle
application and to the COlTIIUission alld council a construction schedule and cO.1upletion
date for the project. If tIle completion date specified for the project is exceeded, tIle
COl1ditional use application shall becolne null and. void. However, the applicant may
sublnit an application for a tilTI.e extension o.n the :project for city council review.. TIle
application for time extension shall be subtnitted at least thirty (30) days .prior to tIle
deadline for cOlupletion of th.e project For projects requiring .platti.ng, the final plat
Inust be recorded within this eighteen (18) month .period. For projects with .multiple
pllases, tIle eighteen (18) lTIonth deadline shall apply to the first phase. In tIle event that
the development is Iuade ill successive COl1tiguo.us segtnents or tuultiple pllases, sue]}
pllases shall be constructed within successive intervals of OIle year froIn the original
date of approval by the co.unciL If tIle successive pllases are not sublnitted within one
year il1tervals, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be .null al1d void4
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034~ PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 3 Of 5
(
(~:-:'... .
(.MCC 11-17-4~B.)
E. Notice afFinal Actio11 alld Right to Regulatory Takillgs Analysis
1. The Applicant is l1ereby notified tllat pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, tIle Owner may
request a regulatory ta.king analysis. Suc:h request must be in writing, and lnust be filed
with the City Clerk 110t more thall twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision
concerning the lnatter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings al1alysis will toll t]le
time peliod witllin which a Petition for Judicial Review Inay.be filed.
2. Please take notice that this 1s a final action of the govenling body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idah.o Code S 67-6521 an affected person being a person wh.o llas
an interest in real pro.pe.t1y whicl11uay be adversely affected by the issuance or dellial of
the conditional .use pel1nit appro.vallnay within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idal10
Code.
F. Exl1ibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved .Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C: Annexation and Zoning COffilnents
Exllibit D: Preli.lnil1ary Plat COllditions of Ap.provaI
Ex.hibit E: Conditional Use Pennit Co.nditiollS of Approval
Exhibit F: Annexatio.n & Zoning Findings
Exhibit G: .Preliminary Plat Findil1gs
.Exllibit H: COl1ditional Use Pennit ~Fi.ndings
By action of tIle City Council at its regular tneeting held on the
/lld/l aA-/ ,2005.
I S-f'6- day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEM.BER CHRISTIN.E DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTE.D
CO.UNCIL MEMBER KEITH .BIRD
VOT.ED
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDlNGS OF FACT~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-034, PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 4 Of 5
(
f.:~~~~... .
/... ..
\. ..
MAYOR TAMMY de WE:ERD
(TIE BREAKER)
~
VOTED
Attest:
and City Attorney.
(
...,. -*~
Dated: 3- \ ~ ' ()C)
B y: "_~-'..
City Clerk's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIO.NS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). AZ-04-034~ PP-04-043, CUP-04-052 - PAGE 5 Of 5
(.-. .
.(".'.... .
~<,~
EXHIBIT A
Hacienda Subdivision
AZ-04-034
Legal Description
Annexation Boundary Description
For
Jayo Company
A parcel for annexation purposes located in Government lots 1 and 2 in the NW ~ of
Section 30t TO'-Vtlship 4 North, Range 1 East Boise Meridian. Ada County~ IdahoJ more
particuJarJy described as follows:
Commencing at a brass cap monument marking the southwest corner of said NW ~
(~ comer) ~ from which a 5/B inch diamete r iron pI n marking the northwest corner of said
Government Lot 2 bears N OQ02.031~ W a distance of 1330J58 feet;
Thence N O~02"031' W along the westerly boundary of said NW }4 a distance of 796.14
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said westerly boundary N OQ02~D3~ W a distance of 534.44 feet
to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin ~
Thence continuing a.long said westerly boundary N Ob01~30tl W a distance of 261.12 feet
to a point:
Thence leaving said westerly boundary N 89440'43~' E a distance of 11 00.65 feet to a
5/8 inch diameter iron pin:
Thence S 0002~36~ W along the easterly boundary of said Government Lots 1 and 2 a
distance of 795.12 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin;
Thence leaving said easterly boundary S 89b39t20j~ W a distance of 1099.61 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
This parcel contains 20.09 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use.
Cjinton W~ Hanscn~ PLS
La lId sorutionst PC
November 8~ 2004
\ \y~ t n L ?X~\V\
U t\ pua\.\G
t'l~E.tnO\~s oE.P1.
\tIQR'~
f. .
\ .
f....~.:.:~.~., ~
\..... .
EXHIBIT B
Hacienda Subdivision
(PP-04-043, CUP-04-052)
Approved Preliminary .Plat/Site Plan
~ f-l'
: ::-~.
,. ........._.... .-....-. .... ,.< J f j
.~ ~.....":- ~. -E- ~ ::-::~.:
! f;
4-, ./_. ~. .-..I,rL,"" ,.~~.u.,~~,~.~<,.. .j.~'~~.' ~.j~".n~~..f. "t t'". -'-F/./; l1<-&- ~-~~
, ~~ t~/" l' ^= ~ ;"~,..~t ;, :::1 ' I. ,..",.,+.-"r..<^_)r~_~~Tff1. j JJ "F.:.$i ~ <' .. :',~,., .;'<'~.~~ ~ jJ H ~t 'S ,~:-' l ( '~<~."-'~
: i . d ,.- ~ · .t t .*'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i!! ~!: l' Jit 1 ~\ f · ~!11 ~ :t..i I i'1 ~ .q~ft. 1 <" ~ l ,~ !j ~ J . 1 JI:U..J{ . f ~. "~ '.. J,
.~ ~ ~ .
~ 9" it ~ ".. ~. : .. I . __.. . . ~
.".. ..'<' :.f' <jj~..~~~~t ..<'\ .'. .,... ·
J
[
1~
,~,
I
...... ....~~.~ . ..~(:
-:~{ ::t-.:;. :.. ::"11 ; ~:;:: ":!
f~~
\..:
(~:'n... .
EXHIBIT C
Annexation and Zoning Application
Hacienda Subdivision AZ-04-034
ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal description submitted with the application (stamped by Clinton .W. Hansell 011 11-
08-04) appears to meet tIle requirelnents of tIle City of Melidian and State Tax COlTI1Uission
and places the parcel contiguous to existing city lilnits.
2. Any existing domestic wells al1d/or septic systelTIS within this :project will have to be
relTIoved froIn their dOlnestic service, .per City Ordinance Section 5-7 -517, when services are
available froin the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes SUCll as
landscape in-igation.
3" All irrigation ditclles, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossillg
or lying adjacent and. contiguous to the .parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13.
Plans will need to be approved by the appro.priate irri.gation/drainage district, or lateral users
association (ditcll owners), with written approval or non-ap.proval sublnitted to the Public
Works Departtnent If lateral users association approval cal1't be obtained, plans will be
reviewed and approved. by tIle Meridian. City :Engineer prior to fillaI plat signature.
4. Any future subdivisiol1, planned develo.pment, uses and constru.ctioll shall co:mply witll the
City of Mer.idian ordinances in effect at the tilne.
(,... .
.f.<<". . .
t
~~. .:.. :
EXHIBIT D
Conditions of Approval
Preliminary Plat
Hacienda Subdi.vision
(File PP-04-043)
SIT:E SPECIFIC CONDITIONS-PRE:LIMINARY PLAT
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site s11al1 be via Inain line extensions frolD the NOli]} Slougll
Trunk that is currently in the design. stage by the City of Meridian. The applicant will be
responsible for constructing the lateral sewer and water luains to and thro.ugll tllis
proposed develop.lnent, there.by mal<ing thelll. available to adjacent properties. The
subdivisiol1 designer is respo.nsible for coordinat.ing Inain sizing and routing wit11 the
Public Works Departtnent. This develo.p.1uent shall be subject to lateco.mer fees, to
reimburse those responsible for bringing sanitary sewer service to the area, w.hen and if
the Latecolners Fee Agreelne.nt is estab.lislled. Latecomer's fees s11a11 be due and payable
prior to signature on the fillaI plat for each pl1ase~
This proposed developtnent is currently not serviceable .by tIle City of Meridian's sanitary
sewer system. Proceedil1g tl1fough tIle approval process is strictly tIle risk of the
applicant. TIle City of Meridian does not guaral1tee sewer service within tIle
developlnent time frames outlined in Meridian City Ordinal1ce.
2. Water service to tllis site shall be via a 16-inch lTI.ain line extension frDIn a Inail1 CU1Tently
being designed by the City of Meridial1~ TIle City's .project will extel1d water service U.P
N. Meridian Road to McMiIlan~ The applicant will be respol1sible for constructing the
16-inch dialneter water :lnains to the mid-section line, al1d a 12-il1Cll Inain to tIle .no.lih
boundary line extended in Meridian Road. All other Inains througll this proposed
developlnent shall .be 8-inch dialneter. The subdivision desigtler is respol1sible for
coordil1ating main sizil1g al1d routillg with the .Public Works DepartInent. This
developlnent shall be subject to latecolner fees, to reimburse tllose responsible for
bringillg water service to tIle area, when and if tIle Latecomers Fee Agreelnent is
established. Lateeo.mer's fees shall be due and payable prior to signature on the fillal plat
for each. phase.
3. TIle applicant has not indicated WI10 will own and luaintain the pressurized irrigatio11
systelTI within this developlnent. If tIle systeln remaills private, plans and specifications
shall be reviewed by tIle Public Works DepartInent as .part of the developluellt plan
review process~ A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation systelu O&M luanuaI lTIUst be
submitted prior to :plan approval, and tIle applicant shall be subject to inigation plan
review fees~ Underground year-roun.d pressurized irrigation must be .provided to all lots
within this. developlnent. The City of .Meridian requires tllat pressurized inigation
systelns be supplied by a year-round. source of water~ Applicant shall be required to
utilize any existi.ng surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well
source is not available, a single-point cOl111ection to the culinary water systelTI 811al1 be
I-Iacienda Subdivision ~ PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 1 of6
( ..
"" ...
f/.~.
\.
required~ If a single-poillt co.nnection is utilized, the developer shall be respo.nsible for the
payment of assessments for the COl11IDOn areas prior to signature on the final plat by the
Meridian City Engineer~
4. If the request is approved by the irrigation district, for all unp:iped (open) sections of tIle
North. Slough Lateral, slopes sllall .not be steeper tllan 4: 1. A "typical" detail of tIle cross-
section of these sections shall be submitted to the P&Z Depa111nent for approval with the
final plat landsca.pe plan~ TIle City Council suppol1s the applicant's intention to 110t pipe
the NOlth Slough Lateral.
5. .Prior to City Council approval of the final plat, the ap.plicant shall sublnit a written
statelnent from Settlers Irrigation District (SID) to the P&Z De.partlnent clarifyillg the
required easement width for the North Slougl1 drail1. Applicant sha111neet tIle conditions
of SID.
6. The plat shall show :Rio Colillas Street as a 36-foot street section.
7. Graphically depict COlIDnOll driveway locations for the townho.use lots in Blocks 6 and 7.
8~ The cOl1ceptual landscape plan submitted witll the prelilnillary plat (Slleets PPL-C and
PP.L-I, dated 11/03/04 by The Land Group) is approved witll the following cllanges:
a. Revise Sheet PPL-I to Sl10W the lal1dscape islal1d in Rio Colil1as.
b. Revise Sheet PPL-l to relllove tIle fel1ce currently shown encroac.hing 011 Lot 18,
Block 4.
c. No trees will be allowed within sanitary sewer or irrigation easements, except as
approved through a separate License Agreelnel1t" Relocate allY trees show witllin
easelnents to otller locations within the developluent.
d~ The applicant shall attelnpt to obtain a Licel1se Agreement witll SID to plal1t trees
within the North Slough Lateral ease.ment for Lot 20, .Block 6, Lot 1, Block 5,
Lots 1 and 12, Block 4 and Lot 1, Block 3. If uns.uccessful, the applicant shall
luitigate for the required nUlTI.ber of trees witl1ill tllese conunon areas (1 :8,000 sq.
ft.) within the subdivision. At a luinimu.m, non-invasive root shrubs s11al1 be
.provided witl1ill these areas, as pennitted by SID.
9. Ullless otherwise waived by the City Council, all irrigatio.n ditches, laterals or canals
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to tIle parcel s.hall be tiled per
:MCC 12-4-13. :Plans will :need to be approved by Settlers Irrigation District, or lateral.
users association (ditcll owners), witll written. approval or non-approval subln.itted to tIle
Public Works Departlnellt If lateral .users associatiol1 approval can't be o.btained, plal1s
will be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat
signature~
Meridian City Code 12-4-13-B requires that tiled ditches l1ave a slo.ped bar-grated ill1et
structure and access/cleal1out boxes at a luaxilTIUln of four .hundred foot (400') spacing
and at all angle pOillts of tIle pipeline. The applicant shall address tIle access to eacll of
these required structures, as SOlne will fall within the bacl( yard of several lots.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 2 of6
(.
(.~...
10. Applicant shall construct a minimum 5-foot wide, detached sidewalk along the entire
subdivision frontage of Meridian Road and adjacent to the designated collector roadways.
Coordinate sidewalk location with ACHD.
11. All areas being counted toward tIle 1 0% open space aln.enity sllaII be free of "wet ponds"
or other SUCll11uisan.ces.. All stonnwater detention facilities incorporated into the required
open space are subject to MCC 12-.13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and
trees, as depicted on the sublnitted landscape plal1s. AllY ACHD-required access
driveways to serve stonnwater areas that are located. within req.uired open space lots sllall
be ShOWll on tIle detailed landscape plalls with eac]l final.plat.
12. Applicant shall construct 6-foot vinyl, perimeter fencing, u.nless otl1erwise approved by
the Zoning Adlnil1istrator.
STANDARD PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS
1. Please SUbluit a copy of the Ada County Street N.alue COlnmittee's approval letter for the
subdivision l1alne, and tile lot and block nUlnberil1g. Make any COITections necessary to
confonn.
2. Coordinate fire .hydral1t placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Departlnen.t
3. A letter of credit or cas]l surety in the alTIOunt of 11 0% will .be required for all fencillg,
Iandscapi11g, play equip.ment, pressurized irrigatio:n, sal1itary sewer, water, etc., .prior to
sigtlature on the final plat
4~ All Inicropaths witl1in the pro.posed subdivisiol1 shall be designed in accordal1ce with
MCC 12-1.3-15 "Micro:patll Landscapil1g".
5. A detailed landscape plall, in cOln.pliance Witll the landscape ordinance s11all be submitted
for tIle subdivision with the final plat application, the landscape plan sllall include tIle
locatiol1 and design of any proposed .playground equiplnent
6. Sidewalks witllin the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC12-13-
1 0-8.
7. 250 and 1 aD-watt, :hig11-pressure sodiuID streetlights will be required at Iocatiol1S
designated by the Public Worlcs Departlnent All streetlights shall be installed. at
subdividerfs expense. Typical locations are at street il1tersections al1d/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and quantity are dete11nined after power designs are cOlnpleted .by
Idal10 Power COlnpany. The street light co.ntractor shall obtain design al1d .pennit from
the Public Warks .Department .prior comlnencing installations.
8. Please sublnit up to date groundwater/soils lTIOllitoring data to tIle Public Works
Department for review" Any drainage areas (detel1tionlretention basins) Inust be d.esiglled
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 3 of6
..r..:~ ... .
{~.. .
\~ .
to ensure that water will percolate within a period of ti.me not to exceed 24 hours for all
stonns up to and including a 1 DO-year storm event. Side slopes within drainage areas
shall not exceed 3: 1.
9. Any tree over 4" in caliper tllat is removed froIn the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent n.uluber of caliper inches of trees that
were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replace.ment trees for
those trees that have to be re.ffioved.
1 O~ Develo.per shall coordil1ate mailbox locations with. the Meridian Post Office.
11. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within this project will have to be
relnoved fro1n their d.omestic service per City Ordinallce Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
12. Compaction test results lnust .be SUbl11itted to tIle Meridian Building Departlnent for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, wllere footil1g would sit atop fiIllnaterial.
13. Ap.plicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stalnped stateluent certifying
that all street finisl1 cellterline elevations are set a luinilnUlTI of three feet above the
.highest established 110rmal groundwater elevation.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. TIle existing residence (future clu.b11ouse) shall be brougl1t up to "Asselnbly" occupancy and
cOIn.ply with tIle IFC.
2. No parkitlg is allowed within any of the "1(11uckle" areas of tIle plat.
3. All roofing materials on the attached dwelling Uluts sIlaIl be a non-colub.ustible InateriaL
4. One and two fmuily dwellings will req.uire a fire-flow of 1 ,000 gallons per m:inute available
for duration of 2 hours to service the el1tire project. Fire l1ydral1ts sllall be placed an. average
of 400' apalt. Inten1ational Fire Code Appelldix D
5. AcceptaJ.lce of the water sup.ply for fire .protection will be by the Me.ridian Water
Departlnent.
6~ Final Approval of tIle fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department
a. Fire Hydrants sllall11ave the 4 Y2" outlet face tIle lnain street or .parking lot aisle.
b. TIle Fire hydrant s11al1 not face a street whicl1 does not l1ave addresses on it
c. Fire :hydrant Inarkers shall be provided per Pu.blic Works spec.
d. Locations witl1 fire hydrants s11allllave the curb painted red 1 0' to each side of the
hydrant locatio.ll.
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners.
f. Fire l1ydrants shall not .have any vertical obstructiol1S to outlets witllin 10'.
I-Iacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 ~ Exhi.bit D
page 4 of6
(,...... .
f/-:-~~.""~ ...
\ .
7. TIle phasing plan may require that any roadway greater tllan 150' in length
that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to l1ave an approved turn around.
8. All el1trance and internal roads sllalI have a turning radius 0[28' inside and
48' outside radius.
9. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintailled free of com.bustible vegetation.
10.. Operatio.nal fire l1ydrants and telnporary or permanent street signs are required .before
combustible construction begins.
11. To increase emergency access to the site a minimuln of two points of access will be required
for any portion of tIle .project, which serves Inore thaJ.l 50 hOlnes. The ap.plicant shall
provide a stub street to the property to the (westleast/nort"lllsouth). The two entrallces sllal1
be separated .by no less than Yt the diago.nallneasurelnent of tIle :project.
12. :Suild:ing setbacks shall be per the .Buildil1g Code for o:n.e and two story construction.
13. The roadways s.hal1 be built to Ada County Higl1way Standards and shall have a clear
driving surface, available at all tilnes, which is 20' wid.e. Streets with less than a 29'
street width shall have no .parking. Streets witllless tllan 33' s.hall .have parking only on
Olle side.
14. Maintain a separation of 5' froIn the building to the dUlnpster el1closure.
15. All .POrtiOl1S of th.e buildings located on this .proj eet IllUst be within 150' of a paved surface
as measured around the .perilneter of the building.
16. All C01UlTIOn driveways shall be straigllt or :have a tu.rnil1g radius of 28' il1s:i.de alld 48'
outside and shallllave a clear driving surface whicll is 20' wide.
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The pedestrian access to the proposed clu.bhouse/cOffilTIU.11ity elltrance is not well-defil1ed.
The applicant shall sublnit a revised landscape plan tllat uses walkway pavi.ng materials
and landscaping to alert motorists to the pedestrian traffic.
2. The .proposed landscaping creates a hiding spot near and south of Lot 20, Block 5 and Lot
24, Block 5~ The applicallt shall su.b:lnit a revised landscaping plan that affords greater
visibility of the area from public areas such as a street or parkil1g lot.
3. Any interior fencing shall allow visibility from the street or shall not exceed fo.ur feet in
height if solid fenci.n.g is used (pertaining to Lot 1, Block 5).
PARKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in tIle City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13-6) will be followed~
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
page 5 of6
(
(/:... ..
\~.~. ...: ..
2. Standard Plan for Protectiol1 of Existing Trees d.uring Construction: The standard
establisl1ed in the City of Meridian Landsca.pe Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13) will be
followed.
SANITARY SE.RVICES co. CONDITIONS
1. Please COlltact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal and
subtnit stalnped (approved) plans witll your Certificate of Zoning Compliance
ap.plication.
Hacienda Subdivision - PP-04-043 - Exhibit D
.Page 6 Of 6
('
('<.:':. .
EXHIBIT E
Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (Conditional Use Permit)
1. Applicant shalltneet all of the requirelnents of tIle preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional U.se Permit
2. A conditiol1 of the CUP/PD shall be that the applicant participates .in any road
infi:astructure agreelnents in tIle North Meridian PlalUling Area negotiated with ACH.D
and shall faitllfully .perfonn the terms of suc.h agreelnent or agreeluents.
3. A minimuln lO-foot setbac:k froIn the Rio Vista .Drive right-of-way is required for tIle
existing wall on Lot 1, .Block 5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance
for the clubhouse lot, the applicant shall Ineet with tIle Meridian Police Chief or his
designee on site to determine the proper lighting, fence height, gates and surveillance
:monitoring around tIle clubl1o.use. S.u.bmit writtel1 approval of said Police Departlnent
approval witl1 the Certificate of Zoning COlTI.pliance for tIle clubllouse.
4. All d.evelopment sIlall cOlnply with the Alnerical1s with Disabilities Act and tIle .Fair
Housil1g Act, including the community clubl1ouse.
5. The applical1t shall .provide/collstruct the following a.tUel1ities withitl tIle subdivision:
a. Over 1 0% of the gross area as opel1 space; and
b. A comlnunity clubhouse with restrooms al1d a SWilTI1Uing pool.
6. TIle followil1g deviations fro:m the Zoning and Subdivisiol1 Ordinal1ce (MCC Title 11 and
12) are approved as part oftllis application:
.Min. .Lot Size- City Requireluent (R-8)
6,500 sq. ft per lot
Approved Lot Size
2,850 Sq9 ft per lot (attaclled units
DIlly)
Lot Frontage- City Requirelnel1t
65' tUillitTIum
Approved Minimulu Frontage
32' IninilTIUlTI
Zero
Lot Lines-
City Requirelnel1t
1 per lot (max.)
Approved Standard
2 per lot
Hacienda Subdivision - CUP-04-052 - Exhibit E
page 1 o:f2
r...:
(.:-...
\:-:~..... .
7. All areas being counted toward tIle 1 0% open space amenity sllall be free of "wet ponds"
or otller such nuisances. All stormwater detentiol1 facilities incorporated into the required
o:pel1 space are subject to MCC 12-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass al1d
trees, as depicted on tIle sublnitted landscape plans.
8. A Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance lTIUst .be obtail1ed for the clubllouse and swinuning
:pool prior to applying for building permits.
9. Townho.use Elevations: A varied color and/or .building "luaterial scheme is required for the
townll01ne structures within the subdivision. Applicant shall obtain written approval froln
tIle P&Z Department for said scheme prior to City Engineer signature of the final.plat
.Hacienda Subdivision ~ CUP-04-052 - Exhibit E
page 2 of2
(
(~.~U
EX:HIBIT F
Annexation and Zoning Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File AZ-04-034)
The City Council hereby approves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning
Amendlnents, both the P&Z Commission and COI-lncil are required uto review the
particular facts and cirCllmstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the
following standards and s/1.all find adequate evidence answering the following questions
about the proposed zOJ1ing amendment. "
A. Will the ne\v zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensi.ve Plan and, if not, has there bee.D an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning design.ation, R-8, is harmonious with and in
accord.ance with the 2002 COlnprel1ensive Plan. and Future Land .Use Map, which
designates tIle land to be Mediu:m Density Residential. Tllere is a minilTIUlTI target
del1sity of tlrree (3) du/acre in tIle Com.prel1el1sive Plan and Haciel1da's gross
density is 4.99 du/acre. The Future Land Use Map S110WS a .potential public par.k
site, regional patllway, and future sellool site in this section. A 10-foot wide
regiol1al patl] was rece.ntIy approved in Saguaro Canyo.n and Ventana
Su.bdivisions to the south and east. Also, Joint Sclloo1 District No. 2 has
purcllased a 41 acre site in the section (two parcels to tIle south) and tlley are not
pursuing allY further land acquisitiol1S in Secti0.11 30 at this tilne (according to
Wendell Big.halTI, Facilities Director). P&Z Departtnent staff is not aware of allY
efforts the Meridian Parks & Recreation :Departlnent is undertal<ing to acquire
land witllin tllis section for a .public .park.
The COlnpre.hensive Plan contains policies Wl1ich el1co.urage developluent to be
pllased in accordance witl1 their connection to tile sewer systelTI (see :policy #8,
page '1 08) and similar policies ailued at controIlil1g growth. T.he parcel is plaul1ed
to be served witll tIle North SOUtll T.runk, which is .not yet constructed to Meridian
Road. TIle Public Works Departlnent has been coordinating witll property owners
to the west and. south on th.e extensio.n and alignnlent of the trunk line. ParalTIo.unt
Subdivision is currently constructing tIle sanitary sewer and will stub to Meridian
Road.
Below are SOIne of tIle 2002 Comprellensive PIall policies Wllic.h generally
support the annexation request (Staff analysis is shown in italics). The application
also lists several other :policies which support the annexation:
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & .Decision and
Order
page I of5
( .
t.
';~....~~. ..
· "PrOlTIote the design of attractive roadway e.ntryway areas throughout
.Meridial1 that will clearly idel1tify the community." (Ch. V, Goal III, Obj.
B. #7)
Hacienda Subdivision is proposing a 35-foot wide landscape buffer lot on
Meridian Road with a substantial amOllnt of new landscaping and
hardscaping therein.
· "N ew developlnent shou.1d not rely on cul-de-sacs since they provide poor
fire access, walkability and neigh.borhood social life. New developlnent
and streets should be designed to encourage walking and bicycling." (Ch.
VI, ,Bullet #2, pg. 71)
There are no ne}v cul-de-sacs planned within the development.
· "Coordinate wit}1 irrigation districts to provide multiple use of existing
irrigation easelnellts." (ell. VII, Goal III, Obj. B, #3)
The applicant is proposing a pathway facility adjacent to the North Slough
Lateral through the majority of the project. They are also proposing to
jceep the facility open as an anlenity to the stlbdivision~ which staff
supports.
· "Require usable open space to be inco:~porated into new residential
subdivision .plats." (ell. VII, Goal IV, O.bj. C, #3)
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
Staff does 110t anticipate that the applicant inte.nds to rezone the subject property
in the future. This is on.Iy tIle fourth urban-scale develolJlnent and al1nexation
applicatiol1 in Section 30, T4.N, Rl E. Upo.n extel1sio.t1 of the North Slough Trunk
iIltO tllis square mile, additio.uaI rezone requ.ests are anticipated.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff finds that tIle proposed single family residential subdivision would be
allowed within the requested zoning district of R-8, with a Planned Developtnent
to allow the reduced frontages, reduced lot sizes and zero lot lines.
D.. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned~ For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
o rdel~
page 2 of5
(
(:.': .;
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that tIle land to the east and south has bee.n recently annexed and
ap.proved for single-family reside.ntial lots in Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
Su.bdivisions. Saguaro Canyon has a gross density of 3 .29 d..u.lacre. ParalUOullt
Subdivision was annexed in 2003 and land itnmediately west of Ventana is zoned
for professio:nal office al1d single family uses. Larkwood Subdivision east of
Saguaro l1as lot sizes that run approxilnately 2 acres eacll. The proposed
density-4.99 d.u../acre gross-is higller tha.n both Saguaro Canyon and Ventana
yet is within the allowable 3-8 units per acre targeted by the COluprehensive :Plal1.
Th.us staff finds tl1at surrounding develoPluents are mixed densities-either tIle
same or less, but the pro.posed density is within the anticipated rallge for a
mediulTI density.project. ACHD has also reviewed the adjacel1t street capacity
and has ap.proved the proposed subdivisio.n (witl1 COllditions).
Meridian Road. (betwee.n Chinden and McMillan) is not .programlued within
ACHD's Five Year Work Prograln~ Me.Millan Road is in ACHD's Capital
Ilnprovelnent ProgralTI a.nd is anticipated to be reconstructed ill 2018. TIle
property is designed to sewer into a portion of the North SIo.ugh Trunk that is not
yet constructed.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff fil1ds that tIle proposed single family residel1tial use will change the existing
rural cllaracter of tIle subject property. There is an estate-type property south of
Haciel1da Subdivision. However, according to public testilnony issued at the
Ventana Subdivision City Councilllearings, the owner is expected to redevelo.p ill
tIle near future. The intended character of tIle vicinity is a Inix of urban and
suburban scale develoPlnents on a generally gridded street systelll with a focus on
single faluily alld lnulti-falnily housing at 3 to 8 d.u./acre9 TIle proposed use is
cOlnpatible with tIle Future Land Use Map. The design alld density conforms to
Inost of tIle Comprel1ensive Plan policies.
F. Will the proposed uses not be .hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
T.he COlTIlUission and Council should rely 011 .public testitnony (oral al1d written)
to detennine wl1ether or :not the pro.posed uses will be distul~bing or hazardous to
tIle existing or future .neighboring .uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the :proposed residel1tial uses will be l1azardous.
However, staff finds that the new residel1ces may be disruptive to existing
agricultural practices to the north. It sllould be noted, however, that the
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
.Page 3 Of 5
(. ..
(~".,..
~-::.:.... ...: .
Commission and Council tnade this finding in tIle affirmative during the Saguaro
Canyon and Ventana Subdivision hearings for the saine rural properties.
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, selver or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zo.ning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be atmexed will or can .be served adequately .by
most essential public facilities al1d services if all conditions of approval are met
by the applicant. The applicant s.hall be required to exte.nd sallitary sewer and
water mains to al1d tlu.ough the proposed d.evelopme.nt, thereby Inakillg thetTI
available to the adjacel1t pro.perties. The applicant al1d/or future property owners
will be required to pay park and .higllway impact fees as well as construct on-site
stonnwater drail1age facilities.
Please review ACHD, Police and the Fire De.partlnent's COlTIlnents concemin.g
t11is subdivision for further il1fonnation regarding public services alld facilities~
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds tllat there will not be excessive add:itiol1al req.ujrelnents at public cost
for pu.blic services and facilities, if the applicant complies with the conditions of
approval for the accolnpanying conditional use .peol1it and prelimil1ary plat
a p p l:i ca ti 0 11S ~
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, .processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general \velfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff recognizes that traffic and noise will increase significantly UpOl1 build-out of
the proposed subdi vision. TIle Co:mmissio.n and COUllCil should refer to the
ACHD staff report for specific details on traffic ilnpacts. The traffic ellgineer for
Vental1a Subdivision determined that, even at project build-out in 2009, Meridian
Road will function at an LOS C or better. Staff does not feel that the alnount
generated will be detrilnental to tIle public welfare if all City and ACHD
conditions of approval are Inet.
Staff fil1ds that the proposed subdivisio.n will not involve uses that would create
other nuisances that would be detritnel1taI to the general welfare of the
surrounding area.
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 4 of5
(-.....
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding .public
streets;
Staff finds that the subdivision's two vellicular approaclles off of Meridian Road
are aligned with existing propelty lines on tIle west side of Meridian Road and
comply with the turn lane and intersection control conditions iln:posed by ACHD4
The other proposed roadways will .need to be improved in cOlnpliance with
ACHD requiretnents in order to alleviate interference witll the existing and
proposed intersections. We do fil1d tllat, as proposed, tIle Rio Colinas Street stub
to the east is show.n as a 32-foot wide street section. The standard pu.blic street
section is 36 feet. Upon future redeveloplnent of the .parcel ill Blythe Estates
Subdivision (to east), tllis fo.ur (4) foot discrepancy lnay create an interference
wit}l future traffic. Staff is reCOlTIlnel1ding this street be designed to a standard 36-
foot sectio.u in tllis area.
The COlTIlnission and Council should review ACHD COlTIlnel1ts concerning
ve.hieular approacl1es and traffic generation.. The ACHD COll11nission has
ap:proved the Hacienda Subdivisio.n .preliminary plat application~
.K. Will not result .in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of .major importance; and
Staff finds that 110 natural or scenic features of In.ajor ilnportance will be lost or
dalnaged by ap.proving the annexation al1d re-ZO.lle. TIle North Slo.ugl1 does bisect
tIle .property and is proposed to be piped undergroulld for 8110rt segtnents through
tIle .project. However, tllis facility is 110t considered to be a feature of "lnajor
ilTI.portance" for tlle COlnlTIUnity. Any existil1g trees larger than 4" caliper that are
removed shall be Initigated for, per the Lal1dscape Ordil1a11ce.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 1.1-17-1992)?
Staff finds that sewer, water, irrigation, solid waste, library, fire and street
services are available to the site. Existing elementary scllool capacity relnaills an
ilnpOl1al1t but und.etelmined factor for this subdivisio.n. T11e school district .has
stated ill the :past (for other Nortll Meridian develo.pments) that additional students
will furt.her cOlnpound the current overcrowded situation and residents cannot be
assured of attending the l1eighborhood school.. Both Havasu Creek and ParalTIOunt
Subdivision 11ave been approved for new elementary scl1ools, although neitller of
these sites l1as a cot1struction date at tllis tilne.
Long-range planning in the North Meridian area has been underway since 20014
This area is a part of the North Meridian Area Plan. The proposed use and
density generally comply with this plan. Staff finds tllat the annexation of this
property is largely in the best interest of the City.
Hacienda Subdivision (AZ-04-034) - Exhibit F - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of.La\v & Decision and
Ordel~
page 5 Of 5
I:: .
i\
(~....
EXHIBIT G
Preliminary Plat Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File PP-04-043)
The City Co.uncil hereby a.pproves the following analysis of required findings by staff:
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a
proposed subdivision, the Conlmission/Council shall consider the obJ~ectives afthis title
and at least the following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive
Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivisiol1 to be in substantial con.fonnance with tIle
Comprehensive :Plan, as noted ill Finding "A" under the Hacienda Annexation and
Zoning application.
bit The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
As noted .under Findings G and L of the Hacienda Anl1exat.ion and ZOlling
application, staff finds that all public services are available to aCCOlnlTIodate the
proposed developluent
CIt The continuity of the proposed development with the capital
improvement program;
The proposed subdivision would not create an.y more additional requirelnents or
de.mands to the City tl1an other standard residential .uses. The Public Works
Departlnel1t CIP il1clud.es the North Slough Trunk extension, Wl1icll this :property
will drain to. TIle developer will need to construct off-site sewer and water
improvements in N. Meridian Road, in accordance witl] the Master Facility Plan.
d. The public fmancial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the developluel1t will require public expenditures for extending tIle
North Slougll Trunk. Specifically, the Public Wor.ks lTIUst el1ter into a co.ntract
witll a private finn to acquire easelnents, design al1d C011StruCt tIle line. The
funding for this extensiol1 is budgeted in tIle FY04 budget, with a prelitninary
Hacienda Subdivision (PP-04-043) - Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of La\v & Decision and
Order
page 1 of2
j.
\,. ..
(
estimated schedule of co.nstruction completion by June 20056
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought
to the Commission's attention.
Other tl1an previously 11oted, staff does not find any other health, safety or
environmental problems associated with this subdivision tllat need to be brougllt
to the Councilor COlnmission' s attention.
Hacienda Subdivision (PP-04-043) - .Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 of2
too. . .
l., . .
(~..:nn ,
EXHIBIT H
Conditional Use Permit Findings
Hacienda Subdivision
(File CUP-04-052)
The City Councilllereby approves the following analysis of required findings .by staff:
The Commission and COllncil shall review the partjettfar facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditionall-ISe in terms of the following and may approve a conditionalllse
permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-
17-3)6'
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards,
open spaces, parking landscaping and other features as .may be required by
this ordinance;
Stafffi.nds that tIle su.bject .property is large el10ugh to aCCOlnlTIodate the requested
use and all. other required features as noted above.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of
this Ordinance;
See Findil1g "A" under tIle Almexation and Zoning application.
c. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible
with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and t.hat such use will not adversely
change the essential character of the same area;
See Filldings ".D" and "E" under tIle Annexatiol1 al1d Zoning ap.plicatio.n.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
See Finding "F" und.er tIle Annexation and Zoning applicatioll.
.E. That the proposed use ,viII be served adequately by essential public facilities
and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for
the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide
adequately any such services;
See Finding "G" under the Annexation alld Zoning a.pplication.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at
I-Iacienda Subdivision (CUP-04-052) - Exhibit H - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 1 of2
(- ..:
(: .
public cost for public facilities and services and \viII not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community;
See Finding "H" under the Annexation and Z011illg a.pplication and Finding ".0"
under the .Prelilninary Plat ap.plicatioll.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
See Finding "I" und.er the Annexation and Zoning ap.plication.
H. That the proposed use will have ve.hicuJar approaches to the property which
shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on
surrounding public streets;
See Findings "I" and "J" ul1der the Annexation and Zon:il1g application.
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
See Finding "K" ullder the Annexatiol1 and Zonil1g a:p.plication.
Hacienda Subdivision (CUP-04-052) - Exhibit H ~ Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Decision and
Order
page 2 of2
(
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-1
REQUEST Water Service Easement for McKague Family Revocable Living Trust
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY AlTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
a
vU
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meeUngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
(n .
City of Meridian
Public Works Dept.
, R)ECEI~V]i~D
r~AR 0 4 2005
Cit.V Of I\1eridian
City Clerl< Office
To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council
From: Karie Glenn
cc: File
Date: 3/4/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 3/15/05 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
3/15/05 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
~ 1) Water Service Easement for McKague Family Revocable Livina Trust.
Typical Water Service Easement.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Water Service Easement for
McKague Family Revocable Living Trust and authorize the Mayor to sign and
City Clerk to attest.
2) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKague Familv Revocable Living
Trust.
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for NlcKague Family Revocable Living Trust and authorize the
Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest
Thank you for your consideration.
. Page 1
f~
\
WATER SERVICE EASEMENT
TIllS lNDENTURE, made this..-- day of . ,20_between McKague Family Revocable
Living Trust, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; .
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, tb,e Grantors desire to provide a water service right-of-way across the premises and
property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
.WHEREAS, the water service is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed
by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from
time to time by the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good
and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the rigbt-
of-way for an easement for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, Teplacement of a water
service over and across the following described property:
, (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the pwpose of construction and operation of a water line and their
allied facilities, together. with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and replacement
at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right -of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors
and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRES SLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after
constrnction, making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the
- water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adj acent property to that existent prior to
undertakin.g such-construction, repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible
for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that
was placed there in violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereqy covenant an~ agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any
permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs 'or flowers within the area described fo"r this
easement, which would interfere with the use of.said easement, for the pwposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of..
way and easement hereby granted sJ?all become part 04 or lie within the boundaries of any -public
street, then, to such extent~ such right-af-way and easement hereby granted which lies withln such
boundary thereof or which is a part thf?reof: shall cease and become null an.d void and of no further
effec~ and shall be completel~ relinquished.
/.
\..
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed
of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to
convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession
thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS \VHEREOF, the said parties of the frrst part have hereunto subscribed their signatures
the day and year flIst herein above written.
GRANTOR:
resident, McKagu.e F y Revocable Living Trust
885 S Locust Grove Rd .
Meridian ill 83642
Secretary
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this 4 day of , 2~ before
and for said State, personally appeared 0 and
,. known or identified to me to be the Presiden and Secretary, respectively, of the
corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me ~at such corporation
executed the same.
IN'" WITNESS \VHEREOF) I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
fist above written.
........
..- I\. GM-'~
.,. p. . ~
.~... .-_.......... I'-A;".
.- -4. v.;.-"" AIt -. ",c ~ -: ~
lit .~, .':'Y~
(SEAL) · ~iI" O't Ii " ·
-;J; '~ " III
. ' , =-
. " 1 -
. f I -
.. t : .
. J , It
. " , e
· \ '0 e
'" , -
.. '\ 4..CJ,~ -
· .', "",'.
.. ~'"~~~...
...ttTF; ot ..
-..... ...
(
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor ·
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
STATE OF IDAHO, )
: ss.
County of.Ada )
On this day of , 2004, before me, the UD.dersigned, a
Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG,
JR.., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who
executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first
above written.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at: '~
Commission Expires:
. (~,..........
EXHIBIT A
EASEMENT . DESCRIPTION
FOR
McKAGUE FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
WATER SERVICE EASEMENT
An easement for water service purposes located ill tIle NE l;4 of the SE 'l4 of Section 18,
Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, lllore patiicularly
described as follows:
Commencing at a brass cap Dlol1ument marl(ing tile northeasterly corner of said NE Y4 of tIle
SE 'l4 from Wl1ich an aluminum cap mOllument marking tIle soutl1easterly comer of the SE ~ of
said Sectio1118 bears S 0030'32" W a distance of2659.49 feet;
The11ce S 0030'32" W along the easterly boundary of said NE 'l4 of the SE Y4 a distance of
346.26 feet to a POil1t;
Tllel1ce leaving said easterly bOUlldary N 89029'28" W a distance of 48~OO feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence continuing N 89029'28" W a distance of 5~OO feet to a point;
Thence S 0030'32" W a distance of 1. 0.00 feet to a POillt;
Tl1ence S 89029'28" E a distaJICe of 5.00 feet to a point;
Thence N 0030'32" E a distance of 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
This parcel COlltaillS 0.001 acres (50 sq~ ft.) and is sllbject to any ot11er easements existing or ill
use~
Prepared by: GleIm K. Bemlett, PLS
Civil Survey Consultants, lilcorporated
Novenlber 10, 2004
(
EXHIBIT B
WATER SERVICE EASEMENT
LOCATED IN iHE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION J8~ TOWNSHIP 3 NORT~ RANGE J EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN. ADA COUNT~ IDAHO.
LOCUST GROVE ROAD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EASEMENT GRANTOR.
ADDRESS:
McKAGUE FAMILY REVOCABLE UVINe TRUST
885 S. LOCUST ceOVE ROAD
MERIDIAN, In 83642
o
50
100
200
300
,
I
SCALE: 1.~ == 1 00 ~
N 89~9~8i1t W
5. 00 '
(2)
S 11 1 841 '267
lOCUST CROVE
~
Ucl(ACUE r AUll Y REVOCABLE LIVlNC TRUST
f~
18 17
19 20
;/
~:,
March 111 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 151 2005
ITEM NO.
5-J
REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKague Family Revocable living
Trust
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUilDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HJGHW A Y DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
City of Meridian
Public Works Dept.
,RECEI .D
~iAR 0 It 2005
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council
From: Karie Glenn
cc: File
Date: 3/4/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 3/15/05 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
3/15/05 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
1) Water Service Easement for McKague Familv Revocable Living Trust.
Typical Water Service Easement.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Water Service Easement for
McKague Family Revocable Living Trust and authorize the Mayor to sign and
City Clerk to attest.
-t 2)
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKague Family Revocable Living
Trust
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for McKague Family Revocable Living Trust and authorize the
Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest.
Thank you for your consideration4
. Page 1
(
("
SANITARY SEWER .AND WATER :MAIN EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of , 20_b.etween McKague Family
Revocable Living Trust, the parties. of the first part, and <hereinafter called the.Grantors, and the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WH:E~AS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way
across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
'WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is. to 1;Je provided for through underground
pipelines to be constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary
sewer and water mains over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B)
The easement hereby .granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary
sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, to gether \Vith their maintenance, repair and
replacemeiIt at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities
at any and all times.
TO HA VB AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that aft~r making repairs .,or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. However, Grant~e. shall not be responsible for repainng, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement
c
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of: or lie within the boUndaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereot: shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lavvfully seized wid
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and t4at they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful clai~s of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
~
President, McK&gu amily Revocable Living Trust, Property Owner
885 S Locust Grove Rd
Meridian ID 83642
------,
Secretary
(~
(~
STATE OF IDAHO )
- ) ss
County of Ada )
On this day of -\'\\{li ~1) , 2cf , befoT me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared. ~ \\'\ Ll~ and
, known or identified to me to be the Pres · ent and Secretary,
Respectively, that executed the' within instrument and acknowledged to. me that such
corporation executed the same.
· IN WITNEs~~~~t~!l:ve here to set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
e I \ -
. ' , .
a ' 1 .
. : : .
II I , II
_ ' , e
- \ , -
\ I ·
· -. \. C ':0.
..~'~l.~~~...
GRANTEE: ...1"';'-"'0-;; ~...
....r; I~..
CITY OF MERIDIAN ......
T~,y de Weerd, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
STATE OF IDAHO, ')
ss.
County of Ada )
On this day of , 20 _, -before me, the undersigned, a Notary
,Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and WILLIAM G.
BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, -respectively, of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, and who executed the within instiument, and acknowledged to me that the City of
Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affi~ed my official seal the day and
year first above written.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at:
Commission Expires:
(
(
EXHIBIT A
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
FOR
McKAGUE FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
An easement for sewer and water main purposes located in tIle NE 'l4 of tIle SE 14 of Section 18,
Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada COUllty, Idaho, lllore particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at a brass cap lllonwnent marlcing the 1101theasterly corner of said NE 'l4 of tile
SE 'l4 froln whicIl an alUll1il1Uill monumellt Inarl<ing tIle soutl1easterly comer of the SE ~ of said
Section 18 bears S 0030'32" W a distance of2659.49 feet;
Thence S 0030'32" W along tIle easterly bOUlldary of said NE ~'of the SE ~ a distance of
453.34 feet to a point;
Thence leaving said easterly baun.clary S 89032'05" W a distance of 240.55 feet to the POlNT
OF BEGINNING;
Tl1ence N 0027'55" W a distance of 10.00 feet to a POillt;
Tllence S 89032'05" W a distance of25.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 0027'55" E a distance of 10.00 feet to a point;
Tllence N 89032'05" E a distance of25.00 feet to tIle POINT OF BEGINNING;
This parcel contains 0.006 acres (250 sq. ft.) and is su.bject to any otller easements existing or in
use~
Prepared. by: Glenn IZ. Belll1ett, PLS
Civil Survey Consultants, hlcorporated
November 10,2004
(':"
~~
EXHIBIT B
SEWER AND WA TER MAIN EASEMENT
LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EASY: BOISE MERllJIAN, ADA COUNT~ IDAHO.
LOCUST GROVE ROAD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EASEMENT GRANTOR~
ADDRESS.A
McKAGlIE FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
885 S. LOCUST ORO VE ROAD
AlERIDIAN, ID 83642
o
I
50
,
100
200
300
I ,
SCALE: 1 t. =1 001
CD
Sll 184 t 7267
LOCUST CROVE
~
~ cKAGUE F ~ UIL Y REVOCABLE UWlG mUST
18 17
19 20
(~
i~
(
March 11 t 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO~
5-L
REQUEST Request for Proposal for Master Plan, Landscape and Architectural SeNices for the 7
acre neighborhood park in Autumn Faire Subdivision by Jensen-Belts Associates and the Design
Team
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meeUngs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
To:
Cc:
From:
Date:
Re:
t.Y.. .:
(
(.... .
RECEIVED
MAR - 9 2005
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Mayor I City Council
Will Berg
Doug Strong tlC9,
March 8, 2005
Consent Agenda Item
The Parks Staff is requesting approval of the proposal for Master Plan, Landscape
and Architectural Services for the 7-acre neighborhood park located in the Autumn
Faire Subdivision. Staff is requesting that this item go before the City Council under
the consent agenda at your March 15,2005 meeting.
The only response was from Jensen-Belts Associates and the Design Team.. The
design team is composed of professionals, highly qualified to address the
requirements of this project and with a good understanding of the site. The various
team members have a long history of project collaboration, including Merrill
Community Park in Eagle, Bear Lake State Park, and currently the Canyon County
Fairgrounds and Depot Park in Caldwell.
( .
(.
March 111 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-M
REQUEST Resolution - Warranty Deed from Autumn Faire, llC to the City of Meridian
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DE?T:
CITY FIRE DE?T:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See attached Resolution
f9ti/
tV
See attached
~
!lvr
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
(.. .
(
CITY 0 F M:E:RID IAN
RESOLUTION NO. &~ -- 4-6 ~
BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A W A:RRANTY DEED :FROM AUTUMN FAIRE
LLC (GRANTO.R) TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY (GRANTEE) FOR
APPROXlMATELY 7.1 ACRES OF REAL .PROPERTY IN THE TRICIA'S CROSSING
SUBD.IVISION FO.R A FUTURE NEIGH.BORHOOD PA.RK, AUT.HORIZING. THE
CITY CLE:RK TO RECORD SAID n:EED IN THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF
ADA COUNTY, lDAHO, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursua.nt to t]le COllditions of approval for the annexation and zoning of the
Autulnn Faire Subdivision (AZ-OO-009), the develo.per agreed to transfer title to approxituately
7.1 acres of real property valued at $204,OOO~OO in exc]lange for a waiver ofpar.k ilnpact fees
associated with tIle project; and
W.HEREAS, re.presentatives [rOIn tIle DepartlneIlt of Pal~ks and Recreatio.n of tIle City of
Meridian have inspected tIle subject .property and detennined tl1at the condition ofth.e property is
acceptable to th.e City; and,
W.HEREAS, the First American Title Insurance COlnpany has issued a Comlnitlnent for
Title Insural1ce for the s.ubject property on tenns acceptable to the City.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
CO.UNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERID.IAN CITY, IDAHO:
Section 1. That the Warranty Deed froIn Autulnn Fa-ire LLC, a copy of which is
attached hereto and inco~porated herein by reference, be alld. the saIne is hereby approved as to
both form and content
Section 2. That the City Clerk be, and he 11ereby is, authorized to record said
WalTanty Deed in the real property records of Ada Co.unty, Idallo for and on behalf of the City of
Meridian.
Section 3. Tllat this Resolution shall be ill full force and effect ilnmediately upon
its adoption and approval.
ADOPTED by tIle City Council of the City of Meridian, Idal10 / 5'7: day of
!1?M,vL ,2005. '1J-
APPROVED by tIle Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ida11o, this /5 -day of
11l~?A--, ,2005.
ReSolution for APproval Of warranty Deed from Autullln Faire L.LC - 10f2
tOO
\~
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
ReSolution for APproval Of warranty Deed from Autumn Faire LLC - 20f2
(
S II ^t:J~ IUJllV E F()!{ R I: llJRI} I NC i J)A r ^
WARRANTY DEED
AUTUMN FAIRE LLC) an Idaho Limited Liability Company, GRANTOR, hereby conveys, grants and warrants to
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a Municipal Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Idaho,
with its principal offices at 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian Idaho 83642, GRANTEE, for good and valuable
consideration) the following described real property in Ada County, State of Idaho, more particularly described as
follows) to wit:
Lot 2, Block 4 ofTricia's Crossing Subdivision, according to the official Plat thereof, filed in Book 90 of
Plats at Page J 0615, Official Records of Ada County, Idaho.
SUBJECT rro taxes and assessments for the current year and all subsequent years, together with any and all
existin~ easements, rights-of-way, reservations, restnctions and encumbrances of record, to any existing
tenanCles~ to all zoning Jaws and ordinances, and to any state of facts an accurate surveyor inspection of the
premises would show.
This conveyance shall include any and all appurtenances, tenements) hereditaments) reversions, remainders,
easements, rights-of-way and water rights in anywise appertaining to the property herein described.
The Grantor covenants to the Grantee that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that the premises are
free from all encumbrances, excepting those as may be herein set forth) and excepting those of record, and that
Grantor shall warrant and defend the same from aHlawful claims.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument on this;...?~./ day of i..,(.~ {~} ~~/ './t )' 2005.
By Steve Schmidt
Its Managing Member
STATE OF IDAHO )
) : ss
County of Ada )
On this /) ~ f day of ... \ t \)'.. \ ., (" 1, .. ~ \ , 2005, before me, .\"".'~ '{l. \.. ", (. .'. ...\ \ ~ ~ ~' )\ {.; ) a Notary Public
in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Steve Schmidt known or identified to me to be the Managing
Member of the limited liability company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on
behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such limited liability company executed the saine.
IN WITNESS WH~'lthaye hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this
certificate first above writteft'4~ \'\ E ' f).~ r /......,. \ )
~' ~~ ............1f . f' ".!II' / · .. j r .
,: <) · .. ':a , l ( (~. ~. if.... i. . / {1.. ,I .). j. ..L...
! I.- ~o" An y ..~\ . ~ Not~~ P~blic -t~~. t~~ State of Idaho
: . ........ . .;.c : ResIdIng at ',f.Jt; ~ .J. .'._... , Idaho
S ... i . \G: .: My Commission Expires \..> II / t"l wt
-:. · PUB \." .. : f
~ 00. ._ 0 ::
~ ,.p .. .. ~ ~..
~tt': r ........ ~ ...""
4'##,f ~ i"E 0 f \\> "..,~
.....".... UI1'l",,""
(
(~..... . .
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO~
5-N
REQUEST Resolution - Establishing Appointments for Board Members and Altemates to the
ValleyRide Regional Transportation Authority
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY AITORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached Resolution
o
/
o
See attached
Confacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meeHngs shall become property of the City of Meridlan~
t.., .
("
\,
CITY O.F MERIDIAN
RESOLUTION NO. 0'5 ~46 q;-
BY T.H'E CITY COUNCIL:
BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
.MERIDIAN, ESTABLISHING APPOINTMENTS FOR BOARD MEMBERS AND
AL T.E,RNA T.ES TO THE V ALLEYRI.DE REGIONAL T.RANSPORT A TION AUTHORITY;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of.Meridian by the passage of Resolution No. 04-446 on October 19,
2004 designated representatives to serve as primary and. alternates for the ValleyRide Regional
Transpo.rtation Authority; and
WHEREAS, due to changes of members of the City Cou,uciI and staff walTanted the need to
change tIle designated primary and alternate representatives; and
W.U.EREAS, Idaho Cod.e 40-2.1 06(3) states board members s11all be appointed by resolution
of the appointment agency;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF T..HE CITY OF ME.RIDIAN CITY, IDAHO:
Section 1. Tllat pursuant to Idaho Code 40-2106, that the following persons be appointed to
the ValleyRide Regional Transp011ation Authority Board:
Cou.ncillnember Christine Doooe!1 as a .primary fe.prese.ntative
TranSpOl1ation Planner Steve Siddoway as a primary representative
City Attolney L.M. Nary as an alternative representative
p & Z COlnmissioner David Zarenlba as an alternative representative
Section 2. That this Reso.lution shall be .in full force and effect inunediately upon its adoption
and. approval.
ADOPTED by the City Council of City of Meridian, Id.aho (Sit day of
m~(/~ , 2005.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this /6".rt- day of
IJl A/tpA., ,2005.
1 0.[ 1
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-0
REQUEST Agreement with HDR for GIS On Call Services
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DE?T:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SffiLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
JNTERMOUNT AI N GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
-- lXI r
vv
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of Merldian~
/oo .
(
l...
<.C.~:.\ECEIVE .._<
MAR 1 0 2005
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CltvtLERK OFFICE
To: William Berg, Jr.
From: Lenard Grady
CC: Brad Watson
Q,~
Date: 3/1 0/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for March 15, 2005 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the
March 15 City Council consent agenda:
t GIS On Call Services - HDR: Attached is a contract with HDR for GIS consulting services.
HDR installed the GIS hardware and software. This contract will be Not-ta-exceed $5,000.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS supp~rt for
$5,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
Additional Pressure Reducinq Valve - Chanqe Order #2 - Star Construction: Attached is
change order #2 with Star Construction for an additional PRV Station on Leighfield, west of
Locust Grove. This PRV will also serve as a Pressure Relief Valve, in the unlikely event that
pressure gets to high. Change Order #1 also added an addition PRV station and Telemetry
for 5 PRV Stations. The current contract price is 1 97 I 112.95. With this Change Order of
$17,973wOO, the total contract price will be $215,085.95.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS support for
$5,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
From the desk of~ ~ .
Victory Road/Meridian Road Water Main: Four bids were received on this
project ra ng ing from $342, 135.00 to $397 1403.0 0 ~ Pa ul construction was th e
Lenard Grady
Staff Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. page 1
(208) 898~5500
Fax: (208) 898-9551
gradyl@meridiancity.org
c.... . .:.
(r.~... .
..... .
apparent low bid. This contract includes the Meridian Road Crossing with a bore.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Contract with Paul Construction for Water Main
on Victory Road including a Meridian Road boar for $342,135.00 and authorize
the Mayor to sign it.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. page 2
Febru~y 25,2005
Mr. Len Grady
City o.f Meridian
660 East Watertower Lane
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Pr.oposal for On...CaII GIS Services
Dear Mr. Grady:
Thank you for asking us. to provide Y<?u with a proposal for Geographic
Information S.ystem (GIS) On Call Services~ We appreciate the opportunity to
continue to serve you.
We've attached two signed copies of a Professional Services Agreement with
.exhibits for your execution. Please sign each and return one original for our.
records.
If you have questions or comments, pleas~ do not hesitate to call me .at (208) 387-
7069, email atdavid.keil@hdrin.c.com. o~ yja the ad.dress shown below. We .look
forward to supporting you and your new GIS staff with technical expertise and
professionalism. l'hank you. ·
Sinc~rely,
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
David Keil, P.E..
.W aterfW astewater Section Manager
HDR Engineering, Inc~
River Quarry at Parke enter
41 Z E Parkcenter Blvd
SUite 1 00
BOise. 10 8370Sa66S9
Phone: (20B} 387-7000
r Fax: (2GB} 387~ 7100
vll\r~IWJldrinc:com
SHORT FORM AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND HDR ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of this day of
20_, between the City of Meridian ("OWNER") an Idaho corporation, with principal
offices at 33 East Idaho Avenue.. Meridian~ Idaho 83642-2300, and HDR
ENGINEERmG, INC., ("ENGINEER") a Nebraska corporation, with principal offices at
8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha) Nebraska, 68114 for services in connection with the
project known as Geo2:raphic Information System (GIS) On-Call Services ("Project");
WHEREAS, OWNER desires to engage ENGINEER to provide professional
engineering, consulting and related services ("Services") in connection with the Project;
and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER desires to render these Services as described in
SECTION I, Scope of Services.
NOW, THEREFORE, OWNER and ENGINEER in consideration of the mutual
covenants contained herein, agree as follows:
SECTION I.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
ENGINEER will provide Services for the Project, which consist of the Scope of Services
as outlined on the attached Exhibit A.
SECTION II.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ENGINEERING
SERVICES
The "HDR Engineering, Inc. Terms and Conditions for Professional Services," which are
attached hereto in Exh.ibit B, are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference as if
fully set forth herein.
SECTION III.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNER
The OWNER shall provide the information set forth in paragraph 6 of the attached "HDR
Engineering, Inc. Terms and Conditions for Professional Services."
SECTION IV.
COMPENSA TION
Compensation for ENGINEER'S services under this Agreement shall be on the basis of
per diem.
The amount of any sales tax, excise tax, value added tax (VAT), or gross receipts tax that
may be imposed on this Agreement shall be added to the ENGINEER'S compensation as
Reimbursable Expenses.
Agreement for prOfeSSional services
1
1-1999
Compensation terms are defined as follows:
Per Diem shall mean an. hourly rate to be paid as total compensation for each hour an
employee works on the project per the rate schedule provided in Exhibit A with annual
adjustments in January resulting from employee base salary or wage increases, plus
Reimbursable Expense.
Reimbursable Expense shall mean the actual expenses incun-ed directly or indirectly in
connection with the Project for transportation travel, subconsultants, subcontractors,
computer usage, telephone, telex, shipping and express, and other incurred expense.
ENGINEER will add ten percent (100/0) to invoices received by ENGINEER from
subconsultants and subcontractors to cover supervision, administrative, and insurance
expenses.
SECTION V.
PERIOD OF SERVICE
Upon receipt of written authorization to proceed, ENGINEER shall petform the services
within the time period(s) described in Exhibit A.
Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, the rates of compensation for ENGINEER'S
services have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the
project through completion. If any specified dates for the completion of ENGINEER) S
services are exceeded through no fault of the ENGINEER, the time for performance of
those services shall be automatically extended for a period which may be reasonably
required for their completion and all rates, measures an.d amounts of ENGINEER'S
compensation shall be equitably adjusted.
Agreement for prOfeSSional services
2
1-1999
\\... .
t.
(.,.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF) the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first written above.
"OWNER"
BY:
NA:ME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
Tammy de Weerd
Mayor
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642-2300
HDR ENGINEERING, lNC~
"ENGINEER"
BY:
NA:ME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
Agreement for prOfeSSional services
3
Vice President
River Quarry at Parkcenter Blvd
412 E Parkcenter Blvd
Suite 100
Boise, ill 83706-6659
1-1999
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
(.
\
ONE COMPANY I Mnnl Solurioiu'"
lil~
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
For
Geographic Information System (GIS) On-Call Services
For
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
BACKGROUND
The City of Merjdian has made an investment in estabrishing a GIS availabJe to City users over a locaJ
area network. The City Planning and Zoning Department has been using limited desktop GIS to support
community pJanning activities and the PubJic Works Department has implemented a network GIS for
support of water and wastewater master pJanning, to enhance responsiveness to information requests by
the public, and to provide a common database of information from which others can access in the future.
In late 2002, the City of Meridian contracted with HDR Engineerjng, IncK (HDR) to perform a Geographjc
Information Systems Needs Assessment (Needs Assessment). The Needs Assessment helped the
Public Works Department understand the many ways in which a GIS could be used to support current
and future activities in the department.. In 2004, the City amended the GIS Needs Assessment contract,
caUed Needs Assessment Phase 2, to purchase hardware and software, install these items, and train
staff on the use of GIS.
HDR has been applying GIS technology since the early 1990's and continues to deliver on projects that
have involved Gl8 technology in public works civil engineering and other disciplines. These projects have
included the utilization of GIS to support water distribution system, wastewater collection system, and
storm water conveyance system anarysis and design, as well as assist in environmental anaJysis for water
resources and transportation planning~
The purpose of this scope of work is to provide a mechanism through which City of Meridian Public Works
and Information TechnoJogy staff can access the technicar expertise of HDR staff directly.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: On-Call GIS Services
Objective:
The objective of this task is to provide technical support to the City of Meridian Public Works Department
and Information Technology staff related to GIS actjvitjes~ If at any time additionaJ support is requested)
HDR is available to respond on an on-call time and materiars basis.
Activities:
· HDR will provide miscellaneous on-carl support to answer questions from the City of Meridian
Public Works Department staff regarding the operation and uses of GlS.
Assumptions:
· Project management activities win be included in the labor rates billed by technical staff required
during task activities.
· On-Call GIS Services wHf be performed with either a written request for services via e-mail, fax} or
letter from the City of Meridian project managerJ or by telephone or personal conversation from
the City of Merjdjan project manager.
City of Meridian
HDR Engineering, Inc.
-1-
GIS On-Call Services
COnSUlting services
scope Of SelVices
2/25/2005
(... .
t.<:...... ..
ONE COMPANY fJ\1fll1J' So!utiollJ-
Hl~
· Services wilJ only be performed once confirmation of requested services has been sent from HDR
staff to the City of Meridjan project manager.
· The schedule to perform services wHI be negotiated at the time services are requested.
Del ivelAab les :
· Status report describing the services provjded in each invoicing period.
Optional Tasks (not included in this scope of work): Application and Data Development
The tasks described beJow focus on the many uses of GIS in the Public Works arena. Potential areas
where a GIS database may be developed or where custom GIS applications coufd be created incJude:
· ArclMS - Internet based GlS mapping provides an opportunity for public agencies to provide
customer and rate payers ready access to informatjon vja the world wjde web~ The existing GIS
system could easUy be adapted to offer external read-only access to select GIS databases for
customers to access remotely. The result would Jikely be a reductjon in the amount of time that
is required for PubHc Works employees to provide customers, developersJ and consurtants with
requested information.
· GASB 34 Asset Management - GASB 24 is a new governmental accounting standard that djrectly
affects how state and locar governments report assets. Thjs may change how pavement
management or other infrastructure assets are documented and reported~ This project requires
that the various utility networks be appropriately attributed and is dependent upon the completion of
other outsourced projects.
· Potable Water Quality Monitoring - The purpose of this task is to develop an application to
isolate potabfe water system contamination and notify residents also includes updating the potable
water system network. This data fayer requires water network editing, jncluding additions of new water
linesf revision of the accuracy of existjng water lines, or updating other network features (e.g.,
valves} manholes, connectors). The project also requires that the water network be assjgned
appropriate NETWORK route system functionality, so that the potable water contamination
notifjcation application can determine which valves serve as "stops" around the location of a
detected contamination point or break. HDR wilr assist the City in establishing requirements for
the applicationt identifying appropriate software, and imprementjng that software} including any
necessary customization. Because the Sanitary Sewer Overfrow Reporting appHcation requires
the potabJe water network as an inputJ the potable water layer must be updated first} making this
project a higher priority chronoJogically. The project is estimated to take 12 months to complete.
· Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reporting - The purpose of this project is to deverop an application that
win compJy with all the public and government notice requirements associated with a sanitary
sewage spill. The project includes an update of the GIS database of the sanitary sewer network. This
data Jayer requires sanitary sewer network edjtingf including additions of new sewer lines, revision
of the accuracy of existing sewer lines, or updating other network features (e.g., vaJves,
manholes, connectors)" The budget estjmate includes line items for writing the computer code
necessary to perform the varve cutoff identificationf identify affected parcels for notification, and
generate an incident report. The Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reporting application requires both the
potable water network and stormwater system network as inputs. The Ada County Highway District
(ACHD) maintains the stormwater system network" Thjs project must foUow the updates to those fayers.
The project is estimated to take 12 months to compJete.
· Work Order Maps - This application calls for a method to generate work order maps for water and
sewer system repair and replacement projects. To do this most effectively, the Public Works
Department should retain a consultant to integrate the sanitary sewer and potable water system GIS
networks into asset management software. Thjs project is estimated to. require 12 months to
complete.
· Utility Public Information Requests - This applicatjon would provide a means for Public Works
Department staff to automate the process for answering questions from deveJopers about the availabiJity
and location of fire hydrants and utiJity services. In particular, this application would compare the
City of Meridian
HDR Engineer;ng~ Inc.
-2-
GIS On-Call Services
Consulting Sef1/ices
scope Of services
2/25/2005
(~. .
(,.-.: :
ONE COM.PANY I,\{ttn)' Solutious"
ID~
invert eJevatfon of water and sewer lines and compare those to ground elevations for the area of
interest to provide information on the depth to which those lines are buried. The application
woufd also provide information on the location and flow of fire hydrants. Invert elevations wouJd be
acquired using a bike-GPS program or other means" This project could follow the completion of the
utiJity networksJ and wourd take about 4 months to complete.
· Infrastructure Condition Rating - This project would require development of an infrastructure
inventory database, and data entry of historical data on repajr history. Since this is a new
database, it would require attribute data entry for 100% of the CityJs road network, but assumes
that ACHD's existjng roadway centerline Jayer would be used with minimal updates beyond
routine maintenance. Data for water and wastewater infrastructure woufd Jargefy be produced
from existjng water djstribution system and wastewater collection system hydraulic models. This
project is not dependent on any other, but could be impJemented in the 2006 time frame due to its low
priority.
· Traffic Network Database - This project would requjre an inventory of all regulatory traffic control
devices in the City, as weU as other reJevant data (e.g., traffic count locations and tabular data).
Traffic co u nt information could be input into a GIS database easily by the Public Warks Department GIS
staff as part of their routine data maintenance activities.. Inventories of traffic control devices
(includjng signs, signals and pavement markings) could be collected by a variety of means,
includjng use of GPS survey crews. VehicJes using GPS, video imaging, and other technologies are
capabJe of capturing spatiaUy accurate roadway and asset data while driving at posted speed limits.
Thjs is a very fast technique, and is superior to field-crew GPS sUNeys for corlection of 9,000 or more
structures. Furthermore, the video imagery collected by the vehicle could be reinterpreted at any
later time to extract more information, aUowing the Public Works Department to budget for the initial
inventory one year, and budget for additional data extraction in later years, based on priority.. This
project is not >dependent on any other, but could be implemented in the 2006 time frame due to its
row priority.
PERIODS OF SERVICE
Task 1
Notice to Proceed - February 25,2005
Contract Expiration - October 31, 2005
COMPENSA TION
Payment for Basic Services
The services pertormed under this contract will be billed on a time and materials basis at the rate
schedule show below for a fee not to exceed $5,000 without prior written approvar from the City of
Meridian project manager.
The rates shown in this scheduJe include overhead and profit, as well as project management and cost
control. Direct expenses, including travel, postage/packaging, telephone/fax, printing, and other
expenses wifl be biHed separatefy from the labor rates. Adjustments to labor rates wfU occur annualfy in
January.
Staff Member
Jon MiJ Is
Rick Lovel
Scott Ma rti n *
Labor Rate
$55.00
$84.00
$95.00
* Scott Martjn's time wilJ be Hmited to less than 8 hours per week.
City of Meridian
HDR Engineering, Inc.
-3-
GIS On-Call Services
COnSUlting SelVices
scope Of services
2/25/2005
EXHIBIT B
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
i~
\.
(~.... .
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Terms and Conditions for Professional Services
1~ STJ\NDARD OF PERFORrvtANCE
The standard of care for aU professional engineering, consulting
and related serv[ces performed or furnished by ENGINEER and
its employees under this Agreement wfl be the care and skill
ordinarily used by members of ENGINEER's profession
practicing under the same or simirar circumstances at the same
time and in the same !ocarity. ENGrNEER makes no \Yarrantiesl
express or jmplied, under this Agreement or otherwise, in
connection 'Nith ENGINEER's services.
2. INSURANCE
ENGJNEER agrees to procure and maintain. at its expense,
Workers. Compensation insLRnce as required by statute;
Employers Uabirity of $25OJOCO; Automobile Uabmty insurance of
$1.003.CJO::) combined sirgle limit for bodily injury and property
damage covering aU vehicJes, including hired vehicles, owned and
non-owned vehicles; Commercial General Uabifity insurance of
$1 JOOO,OOJ combined singre limit for personal injury and property
damage; and Professional LiabUity insurance of $1,000,000 per
craim for protection against cfaims arising out of the performance
of services under this Agreement caused by negligent acts,
errors, or omissions for 'Nhich ENGINEER is legally liab!e. Upon
requestJ OWNER shall be made an additional insured on
Commercial General and Automobile Uability insurance poricies
and certificates of insurance wll be furnished to the OWNER.
ENGINEE R agrees to indemnify OWNER for the dalms covered
by ENGJ NEER's insurance.
3" OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST (COST ESl1MATES)
Any opinions of probable project cost or probable construction cost
provided by ENGI NEER are made on the basis of infOflTlation
available to E NGlNE E R and on the basis of ENGI NE ERts
experience and qualifications, and represents its judgment as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer. However, slnce
ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labort materials,
equipmert or services furnished by others, or over the
contractor(sl) methods of detennining prices, or over competitive
bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER does not guarantee that
proposalst bids or actual project or construction cost \\in not vary
from opinions of probable cost ENGINEER prepares.
4~ CONSlRUC1l0N PROCEDURES
ENGlNEER.s obselVation or monitoring portions of the \'VOrk
performed under construction contrads shall not relieve the
contractor from its responsibility for perfonning work in accordance
'Nith applicable contract documents. ENGINE ER shall not control
or have charge of~ and shalf not be responsible fort construction
means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures of
construction, health or safety programs or precautions connected
with the \VOrl<: and shall not manage, supervise. control or have
charge of construction~ ENGI NEER shan not be responsible for
the acts or omissions of the contractor or other parties on the
project. ENGINEER shalf be entitled to review all construction
contrad documents and to require that no provisions extend the
duties or liabilities of ENGINEER beyond those set forth in this
Agreement. OVVNER agrees to include ENGINEER 8S an
indemnified party in OWNER.s construction contracts for the work,
which shall protect ENGINEER to the same degree as OWNER.
Further, OWNER agrees that ENGINEER shafJ be listed as an
additional insured under the construction contractor's Uability
insurance policies.
5. CONTROWNG LAW
This Agreement is to be governed by the raw of the state 'Nhere
ENGINEER's services are performed.
6. SERVICES AND INFORMATION
OWNER will provide aU criteria and Information pertaining to
OWNER1s requirements for the project~ including design objectfves
and constraintst space, capacity and performance requirementsj
flexibility and expandabilityJ and any budgetary Hmitations.
OWNER win arso provide copies of any OWNER-fumished
Standard Details, Standard SpecifICations, or Standard Bidding
Documents which are to be incorporated into the project.
OW'NER will fumish the services of soils/geotechnical engineers or
other consuttants that include reports and appropriate professional
recommendations vdJen such services are deemed necessary by
ENGINEER. The CWNER agrees to bear rull responsibility for the
technfcal accuracy and content of OV\/NER..fumished documents
and services.
In performing professional engineering and related services
hereunder. it is understood by OWNER that ENGINEER is not
engaged in rendering any type of legal t insurance or accounting
services. opinions or advice~ Further, it is the OWNER's sole
responsibiUty to obtain the advice of an attorney, insurance
counselor or accountant to protect the OWNERts regal and
financial interests. To that end, the OWNER agrees that ONNER
or the OWNER's representative win examrne aU studiesJ reports.
sketchest dravvings, specifications, proposa[s and other
documents, opinions or advice prepared or provided by
ENGINEERl and win obtain the advice of an attorney, insurance
counselor or other consultant as the OWN ER deems necessary to
protect the OWNER's interests before OWNER takes action or
forebears to take action based upon or relying upon the services
provided by ENGIN EER.
7. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
OWNER and ENGINEER, respectively, bind themselves, thejr
partners, successors. assigns. and fega! representatives to the
covenants of this Agreement. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER
WU assign, sublet. or transfer any interest in this Agreement or
cfaims arisirg therefrom without the written consent of the other.
8. REJJSE OF DOCUMENTS
AU documents, including an report8~ dra'Ningst specifications,
computer sofhNare or other items prepared or fumfshed by
ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service
with respect to the project. ENGJN EER retains ownership of aU
such documents. OWNER may retain copies afthe documents for
its infonnation and reference in connection \oVith the project; ho'NeVer, none of the documents are intended or represented to be
suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions afthe
project or on any other project. Any reuse lNithout written
verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose
intended VJiU be at OWNER~ sole risk and VJithout fiability or legal
exposure to ENGINEER, and OWNER v-.;n defend, indemnify and
hold harmless ENGINEER from aU claims, damages, losses and
expenses. including attorney's fees, arisjng or resulting therefrom.
Any such verification or adaptation wiU entitle ENGINEER to further
compensation at rates to be agreed upon by OWNER and
ENGINEER.
9~ TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
OWNER or ENGINEER may terminate the Agreement. in whole or
in part, by giving seven (7) days \Mitten notice) if the other party
substantially faifs to fulfill its obUgations under the Agreement
through no fault of the terminating party. Where the method of
payment is "lump sum,.' or cost reimbursement, the final invoice
'Nill include aU services and expenses associated with the project
up to the effective date of termination. An equitabJe adjusbnent
shaU afso be made to provide for termination settlement costs
ENGI NEER incurs as a result of commitments that had become
firm before tenninationJ and for a reasonable profit for services
performed~
10. SEVERABIUTY
If any provision of this agreement is held jnvalid or unenforceableJ
the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the
(10f2(X)1)
parties. One or more Viaivers by etther party of any provision, term
or condition shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver
of any subsequent breach of the same provision, term or
condition.
11~ INVOICES
ENGtNEER v.1U submit month1y invoices for services rendered
and OWN ER will make prompt payments in response to
E NGJN EE Rts invoicest
ENGIN EER wJI retain receipts for reimbursable expenses in
general accordance Vlith IntemaJ Revenue Service rules pertaining
to the support of expenditures for income tax purposes. Receipts
will be available for inspection by OWNER's auditors upon
req uest.
If OWNER dfsputes any items in ENGINEER's invoice for any
reason} including the lack of supporting documentationt OWNE R
may temporarily delete the disputed item and pay the remaining
amount of the invoice~ OWNER will promptly notify ENGINEER of
the dispute and request clarification and/or correction. After any
dispute has been settled, ENGINEER VIlli include the disputed
item on a subsequent. reguJarty scheduled invoiceJ or on a special
invoice for the disputed item only~
OWNER recognizes that late payment of invojces results in extra
expenses for ENGI NEER. ENGINEE R retajns the right to assess
OWNER interest at the rate of one percent (1%) per month~ but
not to exceed the maximum rate alJo\Yed by !aWl on invoices
'Nhich are not paid within forty.fwe (45) days from the date of the
invoice. In the event undisputed portions of ENGINEER's invoices
are not paid \Nhen due. ENGINEER also reserves the rightt after
seven (7) days prior written notice, to suspend the performance of
its services under this Agreement until all past due amounts have
been paid in fufl.
12. CHANGES
The parties agree that no change or modification to this
Agreementt or any attachments hereto, shall have any force or
effect unress the change is reduced to v.fiting t dated. and made
part of this Agreement~ The execution of the change shall be
authorized and signed in the same manner as this Agreement.
Adjustments in the period of san/ices and in compensation shan
be in accordance Wth applicabfe paragraphs and sections of this
Agreement. Any proposed fees by ENGINEER are estimates to
perfonn the services required to complete the project as
ENGJNEER understands it to be defined. For those projects
invol\ling conceptual or process development services. activities
often are not fulry definable in the initial pJanning~ In any event. as
the project progressesJ the facts developed may dictate a ohange
in the services to be perfonnedJ 'Nhich may after the scope.
E NGrNEER will inform OWNER of such situations so that
changes in scope and adjustments to tile time of perfonnance and
compensation can be made as required~ If such changel
additjonal servicesl or suspension of services resutts in an
increase or decrease in the cost of or time required for
performance of the servicest an equitable adjustment shaH be
made, and the Agreement modified accordinglYR
13~ CONTROLUNG AGREEMENT
These Tenns and Conditions shall take precedence over any
inconsistent or contradictory provisions contained in any proposal I
contract, purchase order, requisitionJ notice-to-pmceedJ or like
document.
144 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND NONDISCRIMINA1l0N
In connection with the services under this Agreement} ENGIN EER
agrees to comply vvith the applicable provisions of federal and
state Equal Employment Opportunity] and other employmentJ
statutes and regulations.
154L HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
OWNER represents to ENG1NEER thatJ to the best of its
knowtedge, no hazardous materials are present at the project
site~ HoweverJ in the event hazardous materials are known to be
Tenns & Conditions for Professional SelVices
(0"
present1 OWNER represents that to the best of its knolNledge it
has disclosed to ENGI N EER the existence of all such
hazardous materials. including but not limited to asbestos,
PCB'St petroleum J hazardous Vv'aste, or rad roactive material
roeated at or near the project sltet including typeJ quantity and
location of such hazardous materials~ It is acknowledg eel by
both parties that ENGfNEERts scope of services do not include
services related jn any way to hazardous materials. In the
event ENGINE E R or any other party encounters undisclosed
hazardous materialsJ ENGI NE E R shall have the obligation to
notify OWNER and, to the extent required by law or regulationl
the appropriate governmental officials. and ENGrNEER may, at
its optio nand witho ut ] i ab i lily for delay J co nse q u entia I or any
other damages to OWNERJ suspend perfonnance of seJVices
on that portion of the project affected by hazardous materials
until OWNER: (i) retains appropriate specialist consuttant(s) or
contractor(s) to identify andf as appropriateJ abate, remediateJ
or remove the hazardous materials; and (ii) Ylarrants that the
project site is in fun compliance 'Nith all appficabfe laws and
regulations. OWN ER acknowtedges that ENGINEER is
perfonning professional services for OWNER and that
ENGINEER is not and shall not be required to become an
~rranger.. Moperator, n llgenerator~"' or tltransporter" of hazardous
materia[s. as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and UabUify Act of 1990 (CERCLA).
Ylhich are or may be encountered at or near the project site in
connection with ENGINEER's services under this Agreement. If
ENGINEER.s services hereunder cannot be performed because
of the existence of hazardous materials, ENG I NE ER shall be
entitred to terminate this Ag reement for cause on 30 days
written notice. To the fullest extent pennitted by law, OWNER
shall indemnity and hold hannless ENGINEER, its officers,
directors, partners, employeesl and subconsuJtants from and
against afl costs. losses. and damages (including but not Jimited
to all fees and charges of engineers~ architects. attorneys, and
other professionals, and aU court or arbitration or other dispute
resolution costs) caused by, arising out of Dr resulting from
hazardous materials, provided that 0) any such cost, loss. or
damage is attributable to bodily injuryJ sickness. disease~ or
deathJ or injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than
completed Work), including the loss of use resulting therefrom.
and (il) nothing in this paragraph shall obligate OWNER to
indemnify any individual or entity from and against the
consequences of that individuarts or entity's sole negligence or
YJiI [ful m isco nd uct.
16. EXECUTION
This Agreement, includill1 the exhibits and schedules made part
hereof, constitute the entire Agreement beWeen ENGJ N EER and
OWNER, supersedes and controls over aU priorv.nitten or oral
understandjngs~ This Agreement may be amended~
supplemented or modified only by a VJTitten instrument duly
executed by the partfes4
17. UMITATlON OF UABIUTY
ENGINEER1s and its emp[oyees~ total liabmty to OWNER for any
loss or damage, including but not llmited to special and
consequential damages arising out of or in connection 'hith the
performance of services or any other cause, including
E NGINEERJs and its employees. professional negligent acts.
errorsr or omissions, shall not exceed the greater of $5O~OO() or
the total compensation received by ENGINEER hereunderJ except
as otherYJise provided under this AgreementJ and OWNER hereby
releases and holds hannless ENGINEER and its employees from
any liability above such amount.
18. UTIGAnON SUPPORT
In the event ENGINEER is required to respond to a subpoenaJ
government inquiry or other legal process related to the services
in connection with a legal or dispute resolution proceeding to
which ENGJNEER is not a party, OIVNER shall reimburse
ENGINEER for reasonable costs in responding and compensate
ENGJ NE ER at its then standard rates for reasonable time incurred
in gathering information and documents and attending
depositions ~ hea ri ngs t and tri a 1.
2
(1012001 )
(n .
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FP 05-015
March 15, 2005
APPLICANT Brighton Development, Inc~ ITEM NO. 9
REQUEST Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2.44 acres in a R-8 zone for
Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8 - west of Locust Grove Road & north of Ustick Rd.
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached staff Comments
St:.e~\::\~ toro~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Phone: 31
~II!-
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
b~f\~ '5 e, b\l~~l\ corf\ COfYl
Doa
(
(.
MAYOR
Talnlny de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL l\11ElVIBERS
Kei tl1 Bird
ChristiJIC DonJleII
Sl13UIl Ward le
Cllarles M. ROulltrce
"~~~
~J
\1
r U.L-\HC) )
iA 1;
.
I an ~~...~fi
PUBLIC \\'ORKS
BUILDING DEPART~"lENT
(208) 898-5500 · Fax (208)898-9551
( ~ J "I ~ r; t".) ~~
PLANNING AND ZONING
D EP ART1\il ENT
(208) 884-5533 · F A)C 888-6854
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing .Date: March 15, 2005
To:
Mayor and City Council
.f11l
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner (..~.
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
.1:11 ~iG~i C 1=f l~~'Tw Dl
c \~ I. ~ oJ 11 1l.:A V
~..:-: "::0-.: V;,.r.-3 ~......... ..Ii ~
.From:
f~4~R 1 n 7n05
~ ~~ fN.~ i ~ <.-.'- ~U
:Re:
Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8
{)ity Of I\1eridiful
City Clerk Office
.Final Plat approval of Two (2) Building Lots on 2.44 Acres in a proposed C-N.
Zone (currently R-8 zone), by Brighton Development, Inc~ (File No. FP-05-015).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of a.pproval. These conditiO.lls shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
T.he ap.plicant, Brighton Developlnent, Inc., 1188 applied for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots
011 2.44 acres of land for Quel1zer COIUJnOnS Su.bdivision No.8. The zoning designation for tIle
proposed subdivision is R-8 (Medium Density Residential) ao.d was approved for COllltnercial
use as part of the 20% land use exception ap.proved with the conditional use pe11n.it/planned
develo.p.ment. A reZOl1e applicatio.n is curre.ntly in process tllat would c.hange the ZOllil1g
designation to C-N (Neigl1borhood Commercial) for tIle cOffilnerciaI portion of tIle developtnel1t
if approved.
Quenzer COlTI1TIOnS Subdivision N.o. 8 is located on the west side of N. .Locust Grove Road,
a.pproxilnately 12 mile north of E. Usticl( Road, in tIle SE ~ of Section 31, T.4N., R.IE.
This subdivision was prelinlinary :platted under the name of Heritage COlTIlnOnS S.ubdivision. The
submitted final plat substantially cOlnplies with the approved :preliminary.plat.
Staff recolumends approval of tIle fi 11 al plat witll tIle comments and conditions stated in this
report.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / :FINAL PLAT
FPMOS-O 15
Quenzer commons SUbS FPodoc
("
~~.
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: Marc.h 15,2005
Page 2
1. Applical1t shall meet all tenns of the approved Prelilninary Plat (P.P-02-007), Conditional
Use Permit/Planned Developlne.nt (CUP-02-007), and Developluent Agreelnent (lust.
N.o.l02078396).
2. Tem.porary construction fencing :is not required along the bo.undaries of this ph.ase. The
applicant subtnitted a construction debris contaimne.nt plan/letter as :part of the
prel:iluinary plat applicatio.n.
3. Street buffer landscaping alon.g N. Locust Grove Road was installed with Quenzer
COlTIlTIOnS Subdivision phase. 3.
4. The pressurized irrigation systelTI within this development is to be owned and .maintained
by the Owner's Associatio.il. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irr.igatio.n
systelTIS be sup.plied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well so.urce is not
available, a single-point c01ll1ection to tIle culinary water system shall be required. Plal1s
and specificatiol1s for the irrigation system shall .be reviewed by the Public Warks
Departlnent as part of the developtnent plan review process, and a draft copy of tIle
pressurized irrigation systeln O&M manual must be subluitted p.rior to .plan approval. If a
single-point connection is utilized, the developer sllall be responsible for th.e payment of
assess.ments for the ilTigable COlTIlTIOn areas prior to signature on tIle final plat by th.e
Meridian City El1gineer.
5. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be a.pproved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved alld activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and
road base approved by the Ada Cou.nty Higllway .District prior to applying for building
permits. All develoPlnent improvements, il1clu.ding perilneter fencing, irrigation, al1d
landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occu.patlcy.
A letter of credit or cash surety :in the atnount of 11 0% will be required for all fellcil1g,
landscaping, .pressurized irrigatiol1, alnenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc., .prior to
signature on the final plat.
6. Sanitary sewer and. lTIunicipal water services to tl1is site sIlall be via extensions fi~oln
existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to COllstruct the sewer al1d water mains to
al1d through this proposed develo.pmel1t, there.by makin.g theln available to adjacent
properties~ Subdivision designer to coordinate .main sizing and routing with the Pu.blic
Warks Departlnent. Applicant shall execute City of Meridial1 standard fonns of
easelnents, for any luains that are required to provide service.
7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public .Works develoPlnent plan review, a.nd
constructiO.ll inspection fees, as detel1ni.ned during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution. 02-374.
8. Please SUbluit all updated groundwater/soils m.onitoring data to the Pu.blic Works
Departmel1t for review. Any drainage areas (detentionlretelltio.n. .basins) lnust be designed
to ensure that water. is retail1ed only during lOO-year storm events, and for a period of
time not to exceed 24 11ours. Side slopes within drainage areas sha11110t exceed 3: 1.. Any
portion of a drai.nage area not ilnproved witll sod/grass seed (or other approved
FP-OS-015 Quenzer commons SUbS FPodoc
(::-::. :. .
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
Page 3
landscaping) shall not count towards the required o.pen space area. The .project engineer
sllould pay close attention to the results of field studies d.eterminil1g the groundwater, soil
type & and characteristics d.uring the desigtl and construction pllases. The engineer shall
be required to certify th.at tIle street cel1terline elevations are set a mil1imUlTI of 3-feet
above the highest established no.nnal groundwater elevation4
9. COlnplete the Certificate ofOw.ners and its accolnpanying Ackn.owledge.ment.
1 O. Ap.plicant shall comply with the item #8 of tile Findin.gs of Fact and Conclusions of Law
and Order of Conditio.nal Approval of the preliminary plat, which reads: There is an
existing, ],300 Joot long, 20-foot wide ingress-egress easement adjacent to the north
boundary which provides Locust Grove Access for the two Crestwood Subdivision lots
and the unplatted .parceL The easement appears to lie entirely within the Heritage
commons boundaryc The applicant shall submit evidence that the easement oj record
permits the applicant to dedicate a public road over the top of said easement lvithollt
vacating the easement and without obtaining consent of the beneficiaries of the easement
11. Applicant sllall be responsible for application and cOlnpliance with any Section 404
Pennitting that Inay be required by the Anny Co.rps of.E.ngineers.
12. Applicallt shall be responsible for application and cOln:pliance with and NPDES
Pennitting that Inay .be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
13. PJease add or revjse the foUowing plat notes on the plat dated 2/14/05:
(10.) Add a note pertainitlg to the Rig.ht to Fann Act.
14. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms of the ap.proved prelilninary
plat, COl1ditional use permit or develo.pment agreelnent does not relieve the Applicant of
respol1sibility for cOln:pliance.
GENERAL .REQUIREMENTS
1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is rem.oved froln tIle .property shall be replaced .by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent nUlnber of caliper inches of trees that
were relTIoved. Required landsca.pil1g trees will not be co.nsidered as replacement trees for
those trees that l1ave to be relnoved.
2. All irrigation ditc:hes, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and co.ntiguous to the area .being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will n.eed to be approved by the appropriate
irrigatio.n/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written
approval or non-approval s.ubmitted to the Public Works Department If lateral users
association approval. can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the
.Meridian City Engilleer prior to final plat signature
FP-OS-O 15
Quenzer COlnmons Sub8 FP.doc
(...
(~~..... : .
~.:.:... :
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
Page 4
3~ A.ny existing dOlnestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
reIn.oved from tlleir d.omestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
4~ Two-l1ul1dred-watt, hig.h-pressure sodiulTI streetlights will be required at locations
designated by tIle Public Works Depal1ment All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expe.nse. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locatiollS and. quantity are detennined. after power designs are completed by
Idaho Power Co:mpal1Y~ The street ligl1t contractor shall obtain design and permit from
the Public Works Departlnent prior cOlnmencing il1staIlations.
5. COlnpaction test results must be submitted to tIle Meridian Building Departlnent for all
building .pads receiving engineered backfill, w.here footing would sit atop fil11naterial~
6. Coordinate fire l1ydrant placelnent with the City of Meridian. Public Works Departlnent.
7. Developer shall coordillate :mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
ST AF.F RECOMMENDATION
StaffreCOI1Unends approval of the final plat with the above stated COffilnents and COllditions.
FPMOS-O 15
Quenzer commons SUbS FPodoc
;
l ,'_. n
\~~.
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466~9272 · FAX 466-4405
PARICS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 · Fax 898-550 1
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 · Fax 887~] 297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 · Fax 888~6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
S11uun Wardle
William L. M. Nary
Charles M. Rountree
Keith Bird
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City
Council please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: March 8, 2005
Transmittal Date: February 25,2005 Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
File No.: FP 05~015
Request: Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2.44 acres in a R-8 zone for
Quenzer Commons Subdivision No 8
By; Brighton Development, Inc.
Location of Property or Project: west of Locust Grove Road & north of Ustick Road
~
David Zaremba, P/Z (NoFP)
David Mae, P/Z (No FP)
Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NOFP)
Michael Rohmf P/Z (NoFP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No FP)
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Charlie Rountree, C/G
Christine Donnell, C/C
Keith Bird, C/G
Shaun Wardle, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney Your Concise Remark ·
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (NoFP)
Meridian Post Office (FPIPPonfy)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig~ District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP~ PP, CUP)
Qwest (FPIPP only)
Intermountain Gas (FPIPPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPIPPonlyj
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County Assess. Land Record~l
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
~~~ r1P~ .
f.t ..::. .'. _' ~ ) · :.~ ....~ ; '.~ \:. f ~-
__ ~f7\ -sr ~(f T lei' l~.
Ui1 E J \ r0 l-A l1 \! t.1 I l % 1.;
L~# if''' ~ *\ D It f:if .ft--,iJ ~s...--/
...~'- \) nfl._A ~J
. tr) & f\ :il~ no~
M.p.~\\ t tr U ~
FER ? 0 0~~r;;
AlP 6 ~ U L tj!j~~J
.(..~it,.v Of I\I1.eridian
~ ..... . I or~ [1
:~...: \ ., ) ... {.-.;, 1 {).1....1 J. ~. t 1 C. ~.~
~:~ ..J ll;.:l.' "-- J t...:~ ~ ~ ..
~ ~~~ .t;'~ ...~~~ RID IAN
. . < i. l~~ } .i~ 1 ~l~w.J..
, .,~, f" ~r-<..~~ <.~ .~1 /\ rif"!1i{' R DEPT
r, ..~. ~. ~<~ ~ l. s! 1 %." \: C.:J...i JCJ 0
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN; IDAHO 83642. (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 0 Human Resources Fax (208) 884~8723 · Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887_4813
.~:
f..
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary / Final/Short Plat ~ /> t!:)S' - CJ / J
G(,LEP ze!2- t20lrljJ,{1J1tAS 0.~f3lJ/t//s-//)d
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Divisio ECEIVED
t~AR 1 0 2005
~y
Return to:
o Boise
DEagle
o Garden City
~eridian
o Kuna
DACZ
o Star
City of Meri d i an
~ify C'lprk Office
o 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
o 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
o 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
o 4. We will require more data concerning soH conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
o 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
o high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics
o or bedrock from original grade 0 other
o 6~ This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
o 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning weJl construction and
water avai labi I ity.
8. After writte approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water wen
interim sewage 0 central water
o individual sewage 0 individual water
9. The folrowing pran(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Divisi on f. nvi ro nmental Quality:
entral sewage community sewage system 0 community water
o sewage dry lines ntral water
. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
o 11. This Department wouJd recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
o 12. rf restroom facilities are to be instaUed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations~
o 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
o food establishment 0 swimming pools or spas
o beverage establishment 0 grocery store
o child care center
4. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations
o 15.
Reviewed By'
15726.001 EH0904
ReView Sheet
(v
\
~ CENTRAL
~ee DISTRICT \
\
\.
b.... DEPARTMENT
-
· MAIl~ OffiCE · 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL a BOISE. ID 83704-0825 0 (20B) 375-5211 · FAX 327.8500
To prevent alld treat"dise,ase GIld disability; to prOllJote healt/I] IlfestJilcs; al!d to protect 4IJd prOll1ot~ the It.ealth and qllality of OUI" etlVirOlzmenL
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMJ\1ENDATIONS
It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated prior to discharge to the
subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and smf~ce water quality. The
engineers. and architects involved with the design.ofthis project should obtain .
cmrent best lllanagement practices for stOiTIl water disposal and design a
stonn water management system that is preventing groundwater and surfac'e
water degradation~ M~uals that could b~.used for guidance are:
, State ofldaho Catalog of Sto nn water Best Management Practices For
Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by the Idaho Departm.ent of Environmental Quality, July
1997.,
Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000.
Ada I Boise County ani ce
707 U. Armstrong PL
Bejsel ID 83704
En viro I Health: 327..7499
Fanuir Planning; 327-7400
-lmmunizatiDn~ 327...7450
Serving Valley, Elnlore, Beise, and Ada Counties
Elmore County Office
520 E~ 8th St, tJorth
Mountain Home, to 83647
Envirol Health: 587..9225
FamUy Health:. 587--4407
Wlr~ ~~7....AA.nQ
Valley County Office
703 N. 1st St
~o. BOX 1448
McCaU.oID 83638
Ph. 63+7194
CAY. C~~_"i-rJl
und.l J rev D303
(
(:.---. . .
RECEIVED
MAR 1 1 2005
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
&
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPAJ IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208~463-0092
7 MarcIl 2005
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFrCE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
William G. Berg Jr., City Clerl(
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ill 83642
RE: FP 05-015 Final Plat for Quenzer Commons S:ubdivision No.8
Dear Will:
Nalnpa & Meridian Irrigation District has no com.ment on the above referenced
application for Final Plat approval for two office building lots on 2.44 acres in a R -8 zone
for Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8.
Sincerely,
IJ;U ;J~
Bill Henson
}\.sst. '.^l ater Superintendent
Nal11pa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
c: File - Office/Shop
APPROXIIv\A TE IRRIGABlE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS ~ 231000
BOISE PROJEG RIGHTS - 40 tOaD
......
(
March 11 , 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO~
s-p
REQUEST Change Order No.2 for an Additional Pressure Reducing Valve with Star Construction
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETfLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
--l_~n__.~_l
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian..
."<;"""~."~:\Er~~ Ct. -~,~ E" I~V." ". E~ -
. -.. "I' I .......... -
t~AR 1 0 2005
ClT.Y OF MERIDIAN
C!~ryfCLERK OFFrCE
To: William Berg, Jr.
From: Lenard Grady
CC: Brad Watson
~~
Date: 3/1 0/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for March 15, 2005 Cjty Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the
March 15 City Council consent agenda:
GIS On Call Services - HDR: Attached is a contract with HDR for GIS consulting s8Nices.
HDR installed the GIS hardware and software. This contract will be Not-ta-exceed $5,000.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS SUPP9rt for
$5,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
'* Additional Pressure Reducinq Valve - Chanqe Order #2 - Star Construction: Attached is
change order #2 with Star Construction for an additional PRV Station on Leighfield, west of
Locust Grove. This PRY will also serve as a Pressure Relief Valve, in the unlikely event that
pressure gets to high~ Change Order #1 also added an addition PRV station and Telemetry
for 5 PRV Stations. The current contract price is 197f112.95~ With this Change Order of
$17,973.00, the total contract price will be $215J085.95.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS support for
$5,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
From the desk of. & .
Victory Road/Meridian Road Water Main: Four bids were received on this
project ranging from $342,135.00 to $397,403.00. Paul construction was the
Lenard Grady
Staff Engin eer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower,. Suite 200
Meridiant Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 898 ~9 551
gradyl@meridiancity,org
/:"
{
apparent tow bid. This contract includes the Meridian Road Crossing with a bore.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Contract with Paul Construction for Water Main
on Victory Road including a Meridian Road boar for $342, 135.00 and authorize
the Mayor to sign it.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 2
(
(
~..~ .
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
No.2
DATE OF ISSUANCE 12/1 0/2004
EFFECTIVE DATE 3/15/2005
OWNER City of Meridian
CONTRACTOR: Star Construction
Contract: Hioh Zone Pressure Reducina Valves (PRVs)
ENGINEER
You are djrected to make the following changes in the Contract Documents:
Description:
1 ) Additional PRY valve equipment on Leighfield and Locust Grove.
Attachments: (List documents supporting change): Quote from Star Constuction.
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRJCE:
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES:
Original Contract Price
$_119.709.95
Original Contract Times:
Substantial Completion: 11/14/2004
Ready for final payment: 11/14/2004
(days or dates)
Net change from previous Change Orders No. _1_ to No. 1_:
Substantial Completion:
Ready for final payment: 120
(days)
Net Increase (Decrease) from previous Change Orders
No.~to-L
$ 77 t403.00
Contract Price prior to this Change Order:
$ 197.112~95
Contract Times prior to this Change Order:
Substantial Completion: 31/14/2004
Ready for final payment: 3/14/2004
(day~ 0 r dates)
Net increase (decrease) this Change Order:
Substantial Completion: 60
Ready for final payment: 60
(days)
Net increase (decrease) of this Change Order:
$ 17 .973~OO
Contract Price with all approved Change Orders:
$ 215t085~95
Contract Times with all approved Change Orders:
Substantial Completion; 5/14/2005
Ready for final payment: 5/14/2005
(days or dates)
By:
Mayor De Weerd
Date:
Date:
EJCDC 1910-8-8 (1996 Edition)
Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee
and endorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America
and the Construction Specifications r nstitute.
Attest:
WHliam Berg JLt City Clerk
CouncH ApprovaJ 3/15/105
APPROVED:
03/07/2005 13:27
21382857947
STAR CONSTRUCTION
('....
PAGE 02
PROPOSAL
STAR CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.
P~OM Box 157 Star, ID 83669
Bus; (208) 286-9198 Ancil- Cell.: 867-7082 Fax: (208) 286-7947
Prooosa! Subntitted To: City of Meridian
Street: 660 E Watertower Lan.e'! Suite 200
City, State ~ Ziv Code~ Meridian. 10 83642
ArchitectJEneineer: N/ A
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for~
Ph 884-8116 Fax 887-1297 Date: 3-07.05
Job Name: Locust Grove PRVlLehi
Job Location.: MeridiaIL ill
Date of Plans: Nt A Revisions: 3...07..0 S
Install 1 0" mechanical items in PR V vault at Locust Grove
Modify operating p(ocedures to include surge relief feature
16,856.00
1, 1 ] 7. 00
Total
$17 ~973.00
Note: This quote includes (2) 4/20 MA pressure transducers but no electrical conduits?
wiring or Seada interfacing&
This estima.te is tor completing the job as describe:d above. It is balled on Qur evaluation and does not it1cludt: materia! pricc increases or iidditionnl labor aJ)d materials
whidJ may be required ~houJd unforC1JeetJ problemz or adverse wc.athe:r conditions ,arise a,fter the work has started.
We hftcby propose to furnish labor BIld materials - complete in accordance "7th the above specifications, for the sutn of
Seventeen Thou&lIld Nine Hundred Seventy-lnree no/l00 dollars ( $1.7;t973.00) vf.ith payment to be made as follows:
As per contract or \1pan compl~tion and or monthly progress estimates paid by the tenth of the month follo\ving billi.ng. Any bat;k charges
tha1 would affedldecrease tbis proposal/contract amoUltt mWit be signed by Star Construction; L.L. C,) or they will be considered invalid.
AU material is guarantetd to be .as spec;fied. AIl work. to be completed in a "vorkmanJike manner acCording to standard p.r:iClic~ Any altemtion or de ' iQn ftom
above specifications mvolv1ng enra C()5b;~ win be executed only upon ,witten orders~ and will become all C(..'1fB. charge OV.t:r and above the cm:ima. All greeinenh:
contiragen.t upon strik.cfi;\ a.ccident.~ Of dt;:!lay:; beyond our cont.rQl. OUr workc::rs arc fully co-Yered b}r W<l:f .5 CDmpe08S.tion insurance and co tmet' n liobi4.ty.
NOTE: This proposal may b~ withdra.wn by 116 jf not 3ccoptcd within fifteen day~. .
Authorized SignilhlI"c _. .
Acceptance of Proposal
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted~ You are authol1,-;ed to do the work
specified. Payment -will be made as outlined. above.
Accepted:
Signamre
Date:
Signature
\
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15,2005
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-Q
REQUEST Award of Bid for Victory Road I Meridian Road wafer Main to Paul Construction
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORN EY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See attached
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
(,.:
(<.-.. '.
\...~.. .
. .. . . .
. . '" '. '. '. . . . . . .... . .' . . ..... .. . :.' .... ." . '.' .' .: ". . .' .:'.' ': .: .:: . . ': . :' ..' .
City of Meridian:.:.....:.;........:....:.:. ....
.. . P.ublic Wo.rk~..:...~~'~...i..:.: :.:.i... ..:
.s: ~'~E.CE .
MAR 1 0 2005
CIT.V OF MERIDIAN
crrV,rCLERK OFFICE
To: William Berg, Jr.
From: Lenard Grady
cc: Brad Watson
~~
Date: 3/1 0/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for March 15, 2005 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the
March 15 City Council consent agenda:
GIS On Call Services - HDR: Attached is a contract with HDR for GIS consulting services.
HDR installed the GIS hardware and software. This contract win be Not-ta-exceed $5,000.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS supp~rt for
$5,000..00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
Additional Pressure Reducino Valve - Chanqe Order #2 - Star Construction: Attached is
change order #2 with Star Construction for an additional PRV Station on Leighfiefd, west of
Locust Grove~ This PRV will also serve as a Pressure Relief Valve, in the unlikely event that
pressure gets to high. Change Order #1 also added an addition PRY station and Telemetry
for 5 PRV Stations. The current contract price is 1 97, 112.95. With this Change Order of
$17J973.00, the total contract price will be $215f085.95.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Agreement with HDR for ON Call GIS support for
$5,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
From the desk of. . ~
'*
Victory Road/Meridian Road Water Main: Four bids were received on this
project ranging from $342, 135.00 to $397 ,403.00. Paul construction was the
Lenard Grady
Staff Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian~ Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898~5500
Fax: (208) 898-9551
grady l@meridiancity.org
(
apparent low bid. This contract includes the Meridian Road Crossing with a bore.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that City Council approve the Contract with Paul Construction for Water Main
on Victory Road including a Meridian Road boar for $342,135.00 and authorize
the Mayor to sign it.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. page 2
=
.~
~
~
~
Q)
~
~
'e
=
o
~
=
~
....c
~
. .-..(
~
Q.)
~
'0
~
o
~
~
~
o
........
u
. ,...-II(
>
I
rIJ
~
~
=
rn
OJ
~
~
. ....:
~
~d... .
c".
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
cdocimodciooci~mmciciciNm~ooooocicicicicicicio~odcidd M
gg~~~~~~~~~oo~~8~g~~gggg8gg888~gg8~gg~g~ ~
U2M~~~~~~~~roN~N~~~ID~~Nm~mM~~N~~roONN~ci~~~ ~
~ ~ ~~~~m~ ~~ W~~WN~~W~~~N~ ~NNW~~~* m
~ ffl ER- fI7 U} 6'7 ~ (;f)- tfl (;Ao ~
o
o
~oaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
~oaooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooo
~ciOO~Nciciood~~~Noom~oomooddoocicicicicicio~dciod~
OO~~~N~NO~M~~~O~NNNMOOOOOOOOO~OOO~OOOO~
mOO ~~~~~~ O~~~~~~m~~~oooo~~oo~~o~~
~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~N~ ~6NN~~~~
M ~~~~~~~~~ NN~ ~
69- El7ER-
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
ciodmorooMomd~~ci~cirom~moooociciciocicidci~doooo m
ovo~mrovooo~mVONvvmoNoorooooooroaoo~oooo~ M
5N~~m~ro~ro~~O~OON~V~~No~ovwm~ro~Noo~~roIDNN ~
=~~N~WMri~~~~N~o*~mri~m~~~N~riW~~~~~N~O~W~ N
o tI:)- ~ E,C} Efl 69- fF? <n T""" 6'7 tI} ('f) (I) CD T"" W- Er.t- 6C7 fI7 W- EI7- 69' or- f:.9- EA-- (I) Ef7 f:fl- ~ f:FJ v
.s €I!- Efl ER- €R- &7 EI)- (fl ~
(J)
c
o
000000000000000000000000000000000000000
~oaoooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
~g~~~g~~~~~~g~g~~~~~~gg~ggggg~gggggggg~
~w~ ~~~~~ O$~~~~VO~oNwmmro~~oo~~NN~~
~ 0 ~~~~~~~~w ~~N~~~~
M ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~
EI7-
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
00000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
ccicici~ooromd~ci~ciciciciIDoodcimddcicicicidocio~ociooci N
2~~~~~~~~R~~~~8N~m~~g~~~Rgg~~~gg8~g~~~~ ~
o - - ~ ~E:IT - ~ ~EI) - .... - - -fA- ~ - - - - · - - -~ - -(I)-{1)- - - - - - - -~EI} c5
2~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ 0~~~~a~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~
10 -r- W 6CT (:R- tfl- EJ9. EfT EA-. E:I7 M
C ~ W
o
()
moooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooo
rnooooooooo~ooaoooooooooaooooooooooooooo
.SE c:i ci 0:) M Lri ci ~ C'i ...t cO Lci Lci (1) ci -.;f 0> ~ 0 d 0 ci ui c:i 0 ci Lci d ci ci ci ci d tri c:i ci ci 0 o:i
O~~~~M~VT""M~~OOO~~NM~OONo~oN~mrooDo~o~~O~
~~~ ~~~~~ O~~~~~~~~~ro~ro~m~~oo~~M~~
-~ ~ ~~~~~W~~~ ~O~N~~~~
M w~~w ~ ~~~~~
(:FJ- E:/:t-69-
aoooooooooaa~oooooooooooooooooaooooooo ~
ooooooooo~oaoooooooooooooooo~oaoooooao N
cNciroN~~~mmM~ci~ci~ONO~ddocicicidcio~cicio~d~~oo ~
g~~~~~~~~~~oo~~g~g~~b~~~~~~g~~~g~8~~~~~~ ~
02~NN~~~ro~MmN~~~~~~~rimM~MN~riO~~OO~MN~~~WN ro
W EI) (:,9- I:F:J- Ef) (:R- .,.- EFJ- <D tA- M &C) m ~ f:R-- ~ EI7 tA- EA- b'7- (Y) Y7 6t7 ~ EI} tI7 ~ <::R- co
~ (fr Ef) (/} (I) EI7 EA- ER- f:F)- ~
o
()
mE~oooooo~oo~oa~ooooooooooooaoooooooooooo
OOMO~ONO~~oo~ooaooaooaoooooo~oooooaooa
Em~~m~~~~o~~~ciomcici~~cicici~~ci~cicirocido~ocimmo
omN~~~~M~~N~~~ONMN~N~ro~~~M~o~v~oo~romm~~
~~~~ ~~~~~ oow~~~~vro~roMmmoo~~~roo~ID~N~~
~ ~ ~~~~~W~N~ ~~MN~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
tFJ- f:f)
<~>~~~~~~~~~>oo~a~~~<~~~~<~<~~~ooww~~~~~
WOU~~~~~~~~~oo~~~~~~wwwwwwwww~~~~~wwww~
oom m~ VVmOO OONM ~
NN~roN~M~OmroM~~mo~~N~V~~N~v~~~g~~~N~~NO
~~NV~roN~~NNv~ ~mMV~~ ~ ~ ~
~
Q)
.c
o c
~ro
~~ ~m ~
I I 0> Q)> L..
~~ C >0 ~_ m
~ ~ ~ .00 8 () c "~e ro
= ~ ~ 2i ~ - in oQ ~ C ~ s:
c ~ OO~~ ~^ 0 00 WN
"Q t5 0 ~ 1 Ea. a. I- () C C c Q) ~ L.. 0 C ~ .b
...... ro UJ ~ ~ '\"- ~ N C'f) E - Q) C C "- "- 0- t: "- 0 () ~ O).c
~ c co ~ I I I · ~ · Q) Q) C 0 ~- +- m co co L.. c: -.J Q) tt= "- C E
ro · Q -=::; U 0 a.. a.. a.. a... }- J- Q) m co ro ::2: :2: ::2: Q) 0 Q) C C\1 'O"..J = (l)
u 10 -5 ~ ~ ~ ~ L..- t-- ....- L..:' L...:" E ~ :::! '- L.. L.. () 0 o~ t ~ ~ o..!S "~~ ~ u
x~ COm"m"mOroOoo Om "ro"mOro"~ u ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ m ~ Q) ~ ~~~~ x ~ rn ffi
w c ~ a. a. a. a. a. 0... a. a. a. m ~ .2 2 ro co co Q) Q) Q) > > co .2 Q) ro C c E UJ <( 0.. U5 u..
a 51-~&~~~&&~&~O::~~~~$ I-Q)~O::->ro->m> ~CJ)~2_Q Q;.9~~ (J d
..- LL -c c ::> > " 0 0 -C r- = OJ L.. 0....... a.. ~ CfJ U)
ro~mwmWWmm$~IDmrooO>~>>Q)cm~~N~IDmOO2~2~ OQ)~~~~
L... t U u u u u u () U () (.) "- Q) ~ ~ ...... ......, '- co ....,. 0 - 0 0 Ci -::= .c:::;
%ga~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$~~~~I~rnEOC~ ro
x ~ E:J:J:3:J:;:J:J::J::S::J::J Ql- - NNCoNNC\JN<O- - N~- ~ 0 00 0_ roo(j~ ~
w~-oowwwW~roOOOOOO2~ro~~~~~~~~~OO~>~OOO~~ONW~OC ~
("
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO ~
5-1
REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "Au in proposed Bonito Subdivision
No.. 2 by Kimball Properties
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATfORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DE?T:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See aHached
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
("
(.:... .
City of Meridian
Public Works Dept.
~R" 111 ~ t: Ei I'J~ D~ l~
.JL yj_A ~ J JL ;f J.G-1, ~
h R .4 f) ~ 1 ^nn~
riJf-'U"~: ~ Luu:J
City Of Meridian
City Clerl{ Office
To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council
From: Karie Glenn
cc: File
Date: 3/9/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 3/15/05 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
3/15/05 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
1) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "8" in Proposed Bonito #2
by Kimball Properties.
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Recommended Council Action: Approve t~e Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for Parcel "B" in Proposed Bonito #2 by Kimball Properties and
authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest.
~2)
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel 'Au in Prooosed Bonito #2
by Kimball Properties.
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for Parcel 'An in Proposed Bonito #2 by Kimball Properties and
authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest.
Thank you for your consideration.
. Page 1
("
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
TillS INDENTURE, made this _ day of , 20_between Kimball Properties Limited
Partnership, the parties of the fIrst part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City o f Meridi an,
Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way
across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground
pipelines to be constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right-af-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary
sewer and water mains over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary
sewer and water mains and their allied fa~ilities, togeth~r with their maintenance, repair and
replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities
at any and all times.
TO HA VB AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, ifs
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties l1ereto,
that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance~ However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT~doc
17991SAN-WAT~
(
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would .interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of: or lie within the bOlUldaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereot: shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
rn WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
Winston H. Moore, e
Kimball Properties Limited Partnership
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
County of Ada )
On this 7'!J.. dayof~t1. re-k , 200S:-beforeme, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared Winston H Moore , lmown or identified to
me to be a partner of Kimball Properties Limited Partnership that executed the within
41~"UII"'" d lm 1 d d th h 1.... ..... d hi d th
~~ ~~~ ac ow e ge to me at sue lmlte partners p execute e same.
~~'-:. .......... O.,p~
~ ... .... ~
! :.lJil M~S~ ~EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
~*i and~i~ fist i~e written.
: ~ : : ~ ~ '
~ -. PUBLIC .: ~
~ -.. .- .~ I ./ A ..... ~
~ ... ..- ~ ~ .,
~"I~lfO:ii~,\\,~ NOTARY PUB Ie FOR 1\HO
IlIfllll\\\ R -d" t C "'----J ~~ I r
eSl lUg a : e a~
Connnission Expires: ~/2.6;/CJ 9
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT~doc
17991SAN-WAT-
("
\...
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
" STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss.
County of Ada )
On this day of , 20 -' before me, the lUldersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE" WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR.,
mown to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and
who executed the within instrument, and aclmowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed
the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mylland and affixed my official seal the day and
year first above written~ .
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at:
Commission Expires:
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT. doe
1799 1 SAN-WAT-
r,".." .
(.
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN
SNAITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BONITO SUBDIVISION NO.2
February 1 0,2005
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL "Aft OF RECORD OF
SURVEY NO. (Q61-lD ,LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, T~3 N~, R.1
E., S.M., THENCE S Ooo14J50n W 806*06 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
THE NE % OF SAID SECTION 20 TO A POINT;
THENCE N 90oQQ'OQJJ W 332.58 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE S 16036'OQ'J W 25.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 73024'00" E 45.85 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 00000'00" W 1 91.25 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 90000'00" E 1 00.09 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S OOoQOJoon W 394.69 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 90000'00" W 87.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S OOOOO~OOJf W 176~71 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 89059'25" E 15.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 00000'00" W 20~OO FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 89059'25" W 35.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N OQoQo'oon E 220.99 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 900QQ}Qon E 36.27 FEET TO A POINT;
17991SEW- W AT-EASE2
THENCE N 00000'00" E 1 0.72 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 90000'00" E 20.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 00000'00" W 10~72 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 900QOfQOJ' E 30.72 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N OOOOOJOO" E 350~41 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 90oQO'OOJJ W 1 00.09 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 00000'00" E 196.34 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 73024'00" W 50.94 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 16036'Qon E 45.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 73024'OQJJ E 20.00 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF
THIS DESCRIPTION.
MICHAEL E. MARKS
P.L.S. NO. 4998
17991SEW-W AT-EASE2
REVISIONS
DRAWN: MEM
\
EX H I BIT "B"
E~ OVERLAND ROAD 17116
C.P~& F. NO. 103135428
BONJTO SUBDrVISION
t. 'A/TPON
DRIVE
PARCEL
ROS NO.
UCJJ
z
o
if)
>
o
(])
LOT 5) BLOCK 4 ~
o
~
z
o
m
LINE TABLE
LINE
l-1
L-2
L-3
L-4
L-5
L-6
L-7
l-B
L-9
L-10
L-l1
L-12
l-13
L-14
L-15
L-16
L-17
L-1B
l-19
L-20
L-21
L-22
LENGTH
25~OO~
4s~a5t
, 91 ~25r
, OO~09.
394~69~
87 ~OOI
17 6~ 71.
15400t
20.00~
35.00'
220.991
36427t
1 0.. 72~
20.00.
1 Or 72~
3D. 72.
.350~4 1 ·
1 OO~09"
196.341
50~ 94'
45. 00 ~
20.aO~
LOT 4} BLOCK 4
BEARrN G
S 16.36~OOM W
S 73.24.00" E
S OO.OO.OOM W
S 90~OOIOOH E
S 00.00*00" W
N 90.0D.OO~ W
S 00.00.00" W
N 89.59125" E
S DO.OO.OOR W
S 89~59.25~ W
N OOUO.OO" E
S 90.0Q100n E
N OO.OO~OO" E
S 90.00tOott E
S OO~OO~oott W
S 90.00.00~ E
N OO.OO~OO'" E
N 90.00100R W
N OO~OO~OOn E
N 73~24'OOW W
N 16.36tOO" E
S 73.24'OO~ E
~
Coo
OLO
c.D~
o ;-
COO
o
332~58~ U1
- -- N OO.OO'OO~W --
BONJTO
SUBDIVrSION
LOT 1 J BLOCK 4
L-
L -----,
L::181 J
I I
J I
I J
I I
8 J I
~I J~
BLOCK 4 I I
~9.
J I
L-13 L-14 l-lSI J
l-1~~1.!tl
r
I L-6
J I 1 \
:::1 I , PARCEL ~'Bn
11 ~r JJ IROS NO.
JI : \ , ----
L-8 L
L cr WA TER UNEl
L-10 -Jl~r - -l J
\~l J i
'~l I I
l~\ J I
N
o
z
z
o
(f)
>
o
(I)
:::)
if)
o
f-
Z
o
(l)
o
w
(f)
o
D-
O
0:::
D-
~?J
?J
~~
GO(
DS/i
OJ\t~
Dfi>/l1:
CJTY OF MERIDIAN
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LJNE EASEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BONITO SUBDJVJSION NO. 2
N E 1 /4, SEe TI 0 N 2 0 J T. 3 N ~ , R. 1 E. , B . M .
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, JDAHO
DATE:
2/10/05
SCALE: NTS
9
10
N
o
<(
o
ll:::
W
--.-J
(9
<:(
w
en
JL
1['
lJOA NO_ 1799 1
(
March 11 f 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO.
5-U
REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel uan in proposed Bonito Subdivision
No. 2 by Kimball Properties
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGfNEER1
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DE?T:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
See attached
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shaJl become property of the City of Meridian..
(
(.:.... .
City of Meridian
Public Works Dept.
..:)c\J,j~~ (~.l~~ I~'l-.h~ ]JJ
~ 3'- :~ ?.... ~ if.. I~ -~n~
K ~ ... ~) \~ ~ . i I:. ; q
i/~FH\ ~ ~ Lu ~j
(:ity Of IVlerid.ia.Jl
Cit~y CIerI\: OffICE:
To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council
From: Karie Glenn
cc: File
Date: 3/9/2005
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 3/15/05 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the
3/15/05 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
~ 1)
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "Btt in Proposed Bonito #2
by Kimball Properties.
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for Parcel "B" in Proposed Bonito #2 by Kimball Properties and
authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest.
2) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel 'Au in Proposed Bonito #2
by Kimball Properties.
Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Easement for Parcel 'Au in Proposed Bonito #2 by Kimball Properties and
authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest.
Thank you for your consideration.
. Page 1
{ .
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
TillS lNDENTURE, made this _ day of ,20_between Kimball Properties Limited
Partnership, the parties of the first part, and 11ereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way
across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground
pipelines to be constructed by others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee tile right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary
sewer and water mains over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHlBITS A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary
sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, to gether with their maintenance, repair and
replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities
at any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between tIle parties hereto,
that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee s.hall restore the area of
the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easement.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT & doc
17991SAN-WAT-
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to "be placed
any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area
described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree wi~ the Grantee that should any part of the
right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of: or lie within the boundaries
of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted
which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become
null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and
lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend tIle title
and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever~
IN" WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the fIrst part have hereunto subscribed t11eir
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
Winston H. Moore,
Kimball Properties Limited Partnership
County of Ada
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss
)
On this 7'!!:- day of MlX-\rvk , 2019s:J;efore me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared Winston H Moore , known or identified to
me to be a partner of Kimball Properties Limited Partnership that executed the within
instrument, and acknowledged to me that suell limited partnership executed the same.
",\\\U III "11111.
IN" ~ . REOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
-"""-~ <;:j .- .. ~
~ xear fist abbve ~tten.
g .. ~OTARl' -.. ~
.E : :*=
= * . ...~ . =
~ . . ~
~ ~.. PUBLIC .: j
.~ -.. ..- ~
~. .e '*
~ .~......-"-~ ~
Jfqll. v I~TE (f \ON ~:~,~
~II'"" III n\\\\\\:
'\
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT. doc
17991SAN-WAT-
( """
~~."." :"
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Attest by William G~ Berg, City Clerk
Approved By City Council On:
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss.
County of Ada )
On this day of , 20 -' before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and WILLIAM G~ BERG, JR.,
known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, ofllie City of Meridian, Idaho, and
who executed the within instrmnent, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed
the same~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and
year first above written.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at:
Commission Expires:
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement
GRANT. doe
17991SAN-WAT-
(
("
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN
SNAITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BONITO SUBDIVISION NO.2
February 10,2005
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL uBu OF RECORD OF
SURVEY NO. lDBZ.lo , LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, T.3 N., R~1
E., S.M., THENCE S 00014'50" W 1761.41 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
THE NE % OF SAID SECTION 20 TO A POINT;
THENCE N 900QQ'QQu W 123.59 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE 20.03 FEET ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF E. GOLDSTONE
· DRIVE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
376~50 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 03002'52", A TANGENT OF 10.02 FEET
AND A CHORD BEARING N 86047'38)' W 20.03 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE;
THENCE N 00019'39" E 134.53 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 89059'25" W 86.19 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 03025'38" E 119.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT OF WAY OF E. GOLDSTONE DRIVE;
THENCE 21.57 FEET ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF E~ GOLDSTONE
DRIVE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
376.50 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 03016'54JJ, A TANGENT OF 10.79 FEET
AND A CHORD BEARING N 71 o28'5Su W 21.56 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE;
THENCE N 03025'38tJ W 112.93 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 89059'25" W 14.53 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N OooQO'QOJJ E 20.00 FEET TO A POINT;
17991SEW- W AT-EASE
(.
(
~~
THENCE N 89059'25" E 13~34 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 03025J38" W 177~02 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 90000JOO" E 20.04 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 03025'38" E 177 .02 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 89059'25" E 1 07.50 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S 00019'39" W 155~66 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION.
MICHAEL E. MARKS
P~L.S. NO~ 4998
17991 SEW - W A T - EASE
N r - J .. I EX H I BIT " B"
I---.J L__J
o I 8 S 90"OOJooU E
r 20. 04'
~ , I
Z I \ I
o I \ \
(!1 I \ \
~ I l I
o I I l I
m j I 1 \ {/)
=> I \z l 0
(!1 I \0 l:J~
J ~\~ l~~
o :j~ oc.;
L- I o,~ \~OJ=
r-- ~ co
Z I W\ ~ \ rr1
o I I \~ I
()) : 11 \ 2 0 ,\
o I f l 1
W N 89"59J 25U E
(!1 I 1 3. 34J \ I
o I Iw l \ N 8g"59~25~' E
D- I Lb~ ~J L____107+50~____1
00 I
Z \ (f) S 89"S9)2SU W I I
fill
\ ~ 1 l I
t fill I l
IZ 1 Xl, U1 l 13:
I ~=l t~~ w I llom
~~\ r IWt-0 m~ I 1~!0
~~ - \ro~ nn ~m
OJ w\ Z lOUJ m~f I~or-
- fT1 w(X) ~~
~ \ \ ~ g~1 I ~
\ \ z l 1
l \ I I
1 1 I I
\ : 2 0':
-- ..... 1 I
S 89"59t25u W
14.53t
(...
10
t"
(
17 16
N
PAR C E L " B"
RECORD OF SURVEY
UNDER REVIEW
Jl
1['
o
3:<(
.. ~ 0
r-oo.::
~ III
-r-;rw
LO"r----1
~oC>
0<(
(f}W
(f)
I
-l
C1 N 90.0Q)QOn W 123+59)
EA GOLDSTONE DRIVE
DRAWN: M EM
DATE: 2/1 0/05
SCALE: 111=50~
CURVE LENGTH
C-1 204 03~
c- 2 21 ~57~
RADIUS
376~50~
376~50'
CURVE TABLE
DELTA TANGENT CHORD BEARING CHORD
3.02152u 1 O~02. N 8S.47t3SU W 20~03~
3.16JS4U 1 O. 79J N 71 ~28158n W 21 ~56~
CrTY OF MERfDIAN
SANJTARY SEWER AND WATER LJNE EASEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BONJTO SUBDIVISION NO. 2
N E 1 /4, SEe TI 0 N 20, T. 3 N A , R ~ 1 E ~ , B . M .
MERIDfAN) ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
REVISIONS
JOB NO. 17991
c.... ....
(::. .
March 1 t , 2005 Department Reports
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15,2005
APPLICANT Police Department ITEM NO~ 6".A-l
REQUEST Presentation of MOU with Ada County Sheriff Department for Participation in SWAT
Team
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITlERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
f/
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
{~
~.,. "
~\
Ada Metro
Special Weapons and Ta-ctics Team
Mutual Assistance Compact
~1~1 ~E (.~; 1~ ]~-'lJi; J[=t:;
~!J f- t ...~~ t - l
~"5 x:::': ~~:::--=- { j ~ ~~u~o~
"gr\r~ , '"1 L :J
rOot it" : 0 0 ~fi ";~" _"~"..
v -. . \; t J. t l,("J t f dJ a~"""
r; .t.*"' T ("'I.'. ... ~- _ ~ ~ 11
~~~..~ l) \~ !erk {)ttlce
ADA COUNTY
(..;""~-~ . .
l,
Mutual Assistance Compact
THIS MUTUAL ASSISTANCE COMPACT made this first day of March
2005, by and between the Ada County Sheriff's Office and the Meridian
Police Department, is entered into for the purpose of establishing and
maintaining the Ada Metro Special Weapons and Tactics Team.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, cooperative partnerships among law enforcement
agencies increase the effectiveness and efficiency in responding to
emergency situations where a specially trained team is necessary; and,
WHEREAS, Idaho Code 67 -2337(4) authorizes law enforcement
agencies to enter into mutual assistance agreements; and,
WHEREAS, the parties named above are in agreement that mutual
assistance among each other, in the form of a multi-agency emergency
response team, designated the Special Weapons and Tactics Team
(SWAT), will assist in the efforts of law enforcement to resolve serious
emergency situations and prevent potential injuries to citizens and
officers; and,
WHEREAS, this Mutual Assistance Compact will provide the
foundation for the operation of the Ada Metro SWAT Team.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants hereinafter contained, and the recitals set forth above, the
parties to this Memorandum of Understanding do hereby understand as
follows:
UNDERSTANDING
1. Purpose and Mission
The primary purpose of the Ada Metro SWAT Team is the handling
of hazardous situations, which are beyond the normal operations of
patrol deputies / officers, investigators or other agencies that request
assistance. These hazardous situations require the need for special
tactics, equipment and/ or weapons for a safe resolution.
2. Functions of the SWAT Unit
SWAT shall be trained and equipped to handle the following types
of situations: .
2
('''-.-.
.. .
1 ~ Barricaded Suspects
2 ~ Snipers
3~ Hostage Situations
4. High-Risk Warrant Service (I.E. Drugs, Guns, Etc.)
5.. Service Of Warrants On Heavily Fortified Locations
6. Civil Disturbances
7 . Dignitary Protections
8. Searches For Armed Suspects
9 ~ Institutional Insurrections
10. Other incidents of a similar nature but not specifically
defined.
3. Effective Term and Method of Termination
This Mutual Assistance Compact will be effective for each calendar
year, beginning Janusary 1,2005. It will automatically renew at the end
of each calendar year, unless terminated pursuant to these provisions.
Any party may terminate its involvement with the Ada Metro SWAT
Unit by providing thirty (30) days prior written notice to the SWAT
Commander.
4. Financing
Each participating agency will provide necessary funding for the
operations of their personnel that are assigned to the Ada Metro SWAT
Team, in so far as each agency's budget allows. Such budgetary
determinations shall be made solely by each agency.
5~ Organizational Structure
A. The SWAT Commander, who shall receive direction and input
from the Ada County Sheriff and the Meridian Police Chief, or
their designees, shall govern the Ada Metro SWAT Team~
B~ The Lead Agency in the Ada Metro SWAT Team shall be the
Ada County Sheriff's Office (ACSO). ACSO shall assign one (1)
Commander of the rank of Lieutenant or above to oversee the
functions of the Ada Metro SWAT Team.
c. Meridian Police Department (MPD) will assign a minimum of
two (2) officers to the Ada Metro SWAT Team.
6. Agency Responsibilities
3
(". . .
(~.:U~... ..
A. General Responsibilities:
1) Provide and account for over time, compensatory time,
personal leave, sick leave, workman's compensation
insurance and other matters directly related to the
employment of their assigned officers; these issues shall
be governed by the personnel policies and procedures of
the member's agency~
2) Provide their assigned law enforcement officer(s) with a
firearm, rifle, ammunition and related equipment, which
is approved by the member agency and suitable for law
enforcement work.
3) Provide their assigned officer(s) any necessary equipment,
such as radio, ballistic vest(s) with identification vest
cover or other appropriate identification, and other
personal equipment such as flash light, eye protection,
helmet, etc.
B. ACSO, as lead agency, will fulfill the following areas of
responsibility:
1) Maintain records of expenditures and training, and
prepare any and all reports necessary to satisfy Federal
and State reporting requirements.
2) Compile necessary statistics regarding deployments and
training, and prepare any and all reports necessary for
SWAT Operations.
3) Provide functional supervision of officers assigned to the
SWAT Team from other agencies4
4) Provide on the job documented, formal training for
newly assigned officers to the Ada Metro SWAT Team.
7. Ada Metro SWAT Team personnel
A. The Ada Metro SWAT Team Commander shall be responsible
for the unit's operations, personnel, deployments and
activities~ The Commander will direct the supervisors assigned
to the unit and will perform administrative duties related to
the management of all Ada Metro SWAT Team operations.
Specific duties of the Ada Metro SWAT Team Commander shall
be to: .
4
('~"..
1) Establish policies and procedures for the Ada Metro
SWAT Team and present them to the participating
agencies for approval~ Ensure all unit policies, procedures
and regulations are followed, and report any violations to
the respective agency ~
2) Ensure monthly reports are submitted to participating
agencies concerning the Ada Metro SWAT Team activities,
performances and funding issues~
3) Approve the Ada Metro SWAT Team expenditures and
ensure they are necessary and legal~
4) Address training needs of the Ada Metro SWAT Team
deputies / officers~
5) As needed, conduct meetings with participating member
agency heads or their designees and address concerns
brought forth~
6) Resolve conflicts between the Ada Metro SWAT Team and
member agency policies and procedures.
B~ The Ada Metro SWAT Supervisor shall supervise the SWAT
activities of assigned members; conducts debriefs, and
address training and personnel issues; and ensure that SWAT
Officers adhere to the policies, procedures and regulations of
the Ada Metro SWAT Team. The Supervisor may offer verbal
counseling or retraining when necessary. Any form of
discipline shall be handled by the officer's agency through the
Ada Metro SWAT Team chain of command~ The Supervisor
shall report directly to the Ada Metro SWAT Team Commander
for all issues relating to SWAT Team operations.
c~ The Ada Metro SWAT Team deputies/officers shall adhere to
and follow policies, procedures and regulations as set forth in
the approved Ada Metro SWAT Team procedures manual and
in this agreement. Additionally, each deputy / officer is
required to:
1) Conduct him/herself as a professional law enforcement
officer and adhere to established ethical standards in
the performance of duties ~
5
(""-.
2) Carry a firearm(s) while on a deployment, approved by
the department or Office from which assignments are
made. Each officer must qualify using the approved
firearm(s) at least one time annually.
3) Immediately notify his/her supervisor if there is a
conflict between Ada Metro SWAT Team policy and
procedure and the policy and procedures of the
respective agency. The supervisor or the Ada Metro
SWAT Team Commander shall resolve these conflicts
before the conflicting action occurs.
4) Become familiar with and act within statutory
requirements. Extraterritorial authority of peace
officers. Ie 67 -2337 (see attached)
8. Personnel Issues
In the event of a complaint against an assigned officer, the
complaint shall be forw-arded to that officer's employing agency for
investigation unless the Ada Metro SWAT Team Commander determines
the issue to be of such a minor nature that the Commander or
Supervisor can appropriately address it and take corrective action.. A
continued, unresolved performance problem with an assigned officer will
be grounds for the Ada Metro SWAT Team Commander to request
replacement of the assigned officer through a recommendation to the
employing agency~
9. Indemnification
Pursuant to and consistent with the terms Ie 67 -2337 (4), in the
event an officer assigned to the unit commits an act, either intentionally
or negligently, within the course and scope of his or her employment
which subjects the officer to liability for personal injury or property
damage, the governmental unit from which the assignment was made
shall assume such liability and will save and hold harmless and
indemnify all other governmental units (that are the signatories of this
agreement) from such liability, including costs, attorney fees and
damages rising therefrom~
6
t...
(...:..... .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and
subscribed their names, the day, month and year in this agreement first
above written.
~~
Dated this~ day of
~~~
, 2005
Attested
WM. "BILL' MUSSER
Chief, Meridian Police Department
7
<.
(
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING
APPLICANT
March 15, 2005
ITEM NO~
8
REQUEST Request for Reduction in Fees for Pinebridge Subdivision by Dave McKinnon
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK: See attached
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
~
~'r '
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Inifials:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian..
(
Tara Green
From: Will Berg
Sent: Friday t March 11, 2005 11 :41 AM
To: Tara Green
Subject: FW: Pre-Council discussion for Pinebridge
-----Orig ina I Message-~--~
From: David McKinnon [mailto:dmckinnon@congergroup.com]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:26 AM
To: bergw@meridiancity .org; dan@baker-properties.net
Subject: Pre-Council discussion for Pinebridge
Dear Mayor and Council,
On behalf of my client, I am requesting a reduction in fees for the Pinebridge Subdivision/Planned Development
application. Pinebridge subdivision is approximately 120 acres in size and will be a large mixed use subdivision consisting
of retail, office, general commercial and multi-family residential uses. All of the different uses will be located within
appropriate zones upon annexation.. All of the lots meet the required lot sizes and dimensions of the specific zones in
which they are located~ The subdivision includes the land that will connect Pine from Eagle Road to Locust Grove.. The
subdivision is designed to meet or exceed all of the minimum requirements of the subdivision and zoning ordinances, and
the Comprehensive Plan.
Upon submission to the Planning and Zoning Department our applicaitons for annexation/rezone, and preliminary plat
were rejected because they were not accompanied by an applicaiton for a Planned Development Anna explained that
she interprets the Comprehensive Plan to read that all development of "Mixed Use" areas should happen as planned
developments because of the language found on page 97 (second to last bullet point) that says they should be developed
only under the CUP process, Ot should be noted it does not mention "Planned DevelopmentU, which is specifically
required in the Uneighborhood center" designation~
What this interpretation does is raise the fees for development of a standard subdivision from approximately $3,000 to
$23,000 (based on a fee of $~02 per square footage of proposed non-residential 5..f..), but it doesn't end there. After
approval of a conceptual PO, that applicant then has to come back for a detailed CUP, and they are again tagged for even
larger fee ($~05 per square foot)f or approximately an additonal $50,000.
These numbers seem high for a sudivision that meets all of the requirements of the Meridian City Code and the intent of
the Comprehensive Plan. Several other developments in the mixed use designation do not require additional detailed
CUPs when they develop under the gUidelines of a developmnet agreement that sets out approved uses (i.e" Silverstone
and EI Dorado)" We are asking for the same approval structure as those developments.
We are happy to pay for the CUP ($325+$15per acre= $2, 125), but ask that we not be required to pay the $20 fOOO+ for
a conceptual planned development when the entire subdivison and development already meets code and does not
require flexibility to increase density or decrease lots sizes or frontages etc...~
Thank you for considering this reduction request and I look forward to speaking with you on Tuesday night.
Si ncerely ,
Dave McKinnon
3/11/2005
(
o 0
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PFP 04-008
March 15, 2005
APPLICANT Bergey Land Surveying ITEM NO. 12
REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from March 1,2005-- Request for Preliminary/Final Plai
approval of 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision -- swc of
East Pine Avenue and North Nola Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORN EY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION;
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNT AJN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTH ER:
See previous Item Packet / Minutes
See attached Recommendations / Findings
~
d
~
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: '3, C:f5
Staff Initials:
Phone:
~
Mateiials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian..
(,.....> .
(-"m .' . , ..:
\~~... . . .
ECEIVE
MAR - 4 2005
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
AFFIDA VIT OF POSTING
ST ATE OF IDAHO )
)
COUNTY OF ADA )
I, ~,{lt//V ~d#'ZC~fK
(name) (address)
31r J. ~-:77~OY
(phone) 0'2 30- 33 OJ
'~i :>e
't Idaho, being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say:
I personally posted the subject property with the hearing notice sign 10 days prior to the
public hearing for preliminary/final plat for four building lots on 8.02 acres in a I-L
zone for Nola Subdivision.
Dated this 4th day of March, 2005.
~","II'. .., ''''''<<
~"t~\CB L. ~##4t.
it~~"'\~ ~".S ED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written~
:/ '/ ~ ':.
: : 't\OT A b 0.. 'i.
.. * . 0(1; .r. .
: e. ....... : :
. . * .
: \.p .:
~ w \. CIa L \ CIS
~ ;.?., . ",:
~ ..<T .... .- r'\ ~
"-r.-l~ -...... ~v~..
#~4##:t: u F 1 'D ~ ~....,..
4..6...~t; III iltLait""
My Commission Expires:
/
{
\.
Merjdian City Council
March 1, 2005
Page 26 of 32
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 14:
Public Hearing: PFP 04-008 Request for Preliminary/Final Plat approval
for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision by
Bergey Land Surveying - SWC of East Pine Avenue and North Nola
Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. I would like to recognize our government students here tonight
I am assuming you're from Meridian High School? Okay. One of my favorite city
volunteer's son is here. I understand you1re the son of Ed Fang? Well, give your dad
our greetings. Is he still in California? Okay. Well, give him our greetings~ He's a good
man. So welcome. 11m sure you1re just really entertained and this is great stuff, isn't it?
Yeah. Okay. Item 14 is Public Hearing PFP 04-008. I will open this Public Hearing
with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayorf Members of the Council, this applicant failed to post the site
correctlYf so I think we need to table for two weeks~
De Weerd: Okay~
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we continue Public Hearing PFP 04-008 to March 15th, 2005~
Donnell: Second.
De Weerd: The motion is to continue Item 14 to March 15th. Actually, I don1t continue it
if it was not posted, do I?
Bird: Yeah~ We have to --
De Weerd: Okay~
Bird: Isn't that right?
Baird: That way, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, those who received radius
notice or mailed notice and who happen to be here tonight, would have notice of a
continued hearing, so we wouldn't have to re-send the mailed notice.
De Weerd: Well, I apologize jf anyone came to testify on this application~ If it's not
posted properly, we can't even entertain testimony on it, so it will be listened to on
March 15th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries.
/..... .
(- ..
/:.. .
(,.. .
PFP 04-008
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
February 3/2005
APPLICANT Bergey Land Surveying ITEM NO. 4
REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from January 6,2005: Preliminary/Final Plat
approval for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision - SWC of East
Pine Avenue and North Nola Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
See previous item packet / attached minutes
See attached staff report
CITY WATER DEPT:
ICe rt D f11
rroVi,
70 ~C
yO
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS! IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTH ER:
Contacted: ~L.L,.~ \&v q-ey Date: d -'{-OS Phone: t58S-~ t~OS8
Emailed: d br:vge.y@b~~r:} ey Ls~ CLJMtaff Initials: (Y); /4:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
c.
MAYOR
Tatll1ny dcWccrd
.;
.1
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 · Fax 466-4405
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keitll Bird
Cllnstille D01111Cll
Sllaun Wardle
Chal.les M. Rountree
rutjl.~rJI
...N .< ~::i~~~~~.:. .~;
.
Ian
If)AHO
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898~5500 ~ Fax 887w 1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 · FAX 888~6854
STAFF REPORT:
Transmittal Date: January 31,2005
P & Z Hearing Date: February 3,2005
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Josh Wilson, Associate City Planner ~
Bruce Freckleton, Development Se ~ ces Manager
From:
Re:
Nola Subdivision (Revised}
Preliminary and Final Plat (PFP) A.pproval of Four (4) Conlmercial Building Lots
on 8.02 Acres in a I-L Zone, by Anderson/Lockwood Foundation. (File No~ PFP-
04-008)
APPLICATION SUl\1MARY
The applicant, Anderson/Lockwood Foundation, has applied for Preliminary/Final Plat (PP)
approval of four (4) buildable lots on 8,,02 acres at the southwest comer of East Pine Avenue
and North Nola Road. A building permit was issued on a .portion of the subject property for
construction of a commercial building, which currently houses Oak Harbor Freight. The
property is designated "Industrial" on the 2002 COlnprehel1sive Plan Future Land Use Map.
The proposed preliminary plat depicts four (4) new buildable lots, which range in size between
0.97 acres and. 5.05 acres. Staff recommends ap.proval of the submitted Preli.minary/Final Plat
(PFP-04-008) application with the comments and conditions stated in this report.
LOCATION
TIle subject property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of East Pine Avenue
and North Nola Road. It is located in the NW ~, SW 'l4 of Section 8, Township 4 North, Range
1 East.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North - One (1) .parcel, totaling approx. 4~8 acres (zoned I-L, City of Meridian), and one (1)
parcel, totaling approx~ 195 acres (zoned RUT, Ada County).
South - One (1) :parceI, totaling approx. 7~7 acres (zoned I-L, City of Meridian).
East - One parcel (1) parcel, totaling approx~ 449 acres, containing Crossroads Middle School
(zo.ned T-E, City of Meridian), and one (1) parcel, totaling approx. 14.8 acres (zoned RUT, Ada
County).
West - Railside Park Subdivision., including: one parcel (1) parcel, totaling approx~ 1.2 acres
(zoned I-L, City of Meridian), one (1) parcel, totaling approx~ 194 acres (zoned I-L, City of
Meridian), and one (1) parcel, totaling approx. 1.4 acres (zoned I-L, City of Meridian).
.PFP~04-008
NOla Su b~ P.FP . dOC
("
P&Z COffilnission, Mayor & City Council
Nola Subdivision
Page 2
OWNER OF RECORD
The property owner of record is Anderson/Lockwood Foundation. Doug Bergey of Bergey Land
Surveying has provided notarized consent to submit the subject application.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS
Meridian City Code (MCC) 12-3-3 1.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the
acc~ptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of
this title and at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivis.ion with the Comprehensive Plan;
Staff finds the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates all of the
subject property as "IndustriaL" The purpose of the Industrial designation is "... to allow
a range of industrial uses to support industrial and commercial activities and to develop
with sufficient urban services.. In light industrial areas, uses may include warehouses,
storage units, light manufacturing, and incidental retail and offices uses.. Heavy industrial
areas may include processing, manufacturing, warellouses, storage units, and industrial
support activities" In all cases, standards for screening, landscaping, and adequate access
would be developed and implemented." (See Chapter VII, pg. 99.)
Staff finds that the .proposed subdivision is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
B. The availability of pubUc serv.ices to accommodate the proposed development;
Locust Grove is currently included in ACHD's Five-Year Work Program (2007) and
Capital Improvements Plan (#80).. Locust Grove is anticipated to be 5 lanes from
Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes within 96-
feet of right of waY9 The intersection of Locust Grove and Pine is scheduled to be
widened and signalized with that saIne project.
The subject site can be serviced by the City of Meridian's sanitary sewer and water
syste.ms. Sanitary sewer and water mains would have to be extended into the site .by tIle
developer from East Pine Avenue.
On November 12, 2004, a joint agency/department comnlents meeting was held with
representatives of key service providers to this property. The Meridian Fire Department is
supportive of the subdivision. The applicant should coordinate the location and design of
refuse container(s) with Sanitary Services Com:pany (SSe). Trash enclosures must be
built in the location and to the size approved. by sse.. All dumpster(s) must .be screened
in accordance with MCC 11-12-1.C.
The Commission and. Council should reference any written or verbal testimony submitted
by the Meridian Police Department, and any atller agen.cy not listed above, regarding
their ability to adequately service this project
PF.P~04-008
NOla SUb4PFP.doc
(
P&Z Conunission, Mayor & City Council
Nola Subdivision
Page 3
Staff finds that the property proposed for development can be serviced by essential public
facilities and services~
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not conflict with tIle capital improvement program
because the developer is required to install sewer, water, utilities and inigation, for the
development at their cost
D. The public fmancial. capability of supporting services for the proposed development;
The developer will be financing the extension of sewer, water, utilities and irrigation
services to serve the project. The .primary public costs to serve the future site will be fire
and police services. Staff finds tllat this development will .not cause excessive additional
requirements at public cost, if the applicant complies with the conditions of approval for
the and preliminary plat application. The Conunission and Council should consider the
Meridian Police, Parks and Fire Departments' comments with regard to th.eir capability to
serve the proposed development.
E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis; ACHD staff has approved this
subdivision, with conditions. Tllere are no healtl1, safety, or environmental problems to
bring to the Commission's attention.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. Cross Access Agreement (Pine and Nola)- Lots 1,2, and 3 must share a conunon access to
East Pine Avenue, per ACHD requireme.nts, requiring a cross-access agree.ment between
Lots 1, 2, and 3 for access to the s.hared driveway~ See Site Specific Condition #15~
2. Multi-.Use Pathway- The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map depicts a multi-use
pathway adjacent to the property along North Nola Road on the eastern boundary of tIle
pro.perty~ T.he City of Meridian anticipates negotiations with ACHD concerning the design
of the Locust Grove Road. extension and. sufficient right-of-way exists for location of the
multi-use pathway along Locust Grove Road. Also, the City of Meridian anticipates the
location of a multi-use pathway on the south side of East Pine Avenue for connection to a
planned pathway on an adjacent property to the northeast of the proposed. subdivision~
Therefore, tIle City of Meridian reserves the right to acquire a pedestrian easement on tIle
subject .property in the future. See Site Specific Condition #6.
39 Required Street Buffers- The City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance requires that the
landscape buffers along Nola Road and Locust Grove Road be extended to the south
boundary of Lot 4~ Locust Grove Road requires a 25-foot landscape ease.ment, as shown on
Lot 1; Nola Road requires a lO-foot landscape easement, as shown on Lot 3.
PFP-04-008
ON 0] a SUb. PFoP tdoc
{
~\. .
(
P&Z Conunission, Mayor & City Council
N ala Subdivision
Page 4
4~ :Prohibited Plant Material in Landscape Buffer- Meridian City Code 12-13-7-2 prohibits
conifers from being planted in required street buffers. TIle Landscape Plan, dated. 1/18/05 by
Beck and Baird, shows a conifer placed within the street buffer along Locust Grove Road
near the property line between Lots 1 and 4. The applicant shaU submit a revised
Landscape Plan which shows the conifer removed from the street buffer prior to the
City Council hearing.
5~ Insufficient Street Trees: Meridian City Code 12-13-10-6 requires that there are a minimum
of one (1) tree per thirty-five (35) linear feet in required street buffers. The submitted
Landscape Plan shows sixteen (16) trees along the Nola Road frontage, which totals
ap.proximately 686-feet At one (1) tree per thirty-five (35) linear feet, twenty (20) trees are
required along Nola Road. The applicant shall submit a revised Landscape Plan which
shows the four (4) additional trees required prior to the City Council hearing.
6. CCR's- No CCR's have been submitted that detail the responsibilities for the maintenance of
the landscaping and conunon parking/drainage areas, or the establishment of a business
owner's association. The applicant shall submit CCR's for the subdivision prior to the
City Council hearing.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL PLAT)
1. Make the following modifications to the final plat prior to record.ation:
a. The 25-foot landscape easelnent along Locust Grove Road shall be extended to the
southern boundary of Lot 4.
b~ The 10-foot landscape easement along Nola Road shall be extended to the southern
.boundary of Lot 4.
c. Provide a note granting cross-access to Lots 1, 2, and 3 to utilize the new drive access
to East Pine Avenue..
d~ Modify note #6 to include the extended landscape easeme.nts on Lot 4.
2. The applicant shall revise the Landscape Plan, dated 1/18/05 by Beck and Baird, and submit
10 copies of the revised plan to the City Clerk's office at least 10 days prior to the City
Council hearing. The Landscape Plan shows a cOl1ifer placed within the street buffer along
Locust Grove Road near the property line between Lots 1 and 4, w.hich is prohibited by
Meridian City Code 12-13-7-2. The conifer shall be removed from the landscape plan or
placed in a location Wl1ich complies with MCC 12-13-7-2. TIle Landscape Plan sllall also be
revise to show th.e four (4) additional trees required in the street buffer along Nola Road.
3.. The applicant shall sub.mit CCR's that detail the responsibilities for the maintenance of the
landscaping and common parking and drainage areas for the subdivision prior to the City
Council hearing.
4. Water service to this site shall be via service line extensions from the existing .mains adjacent
to the property. Ap.plicant shall execute City of Meridian standard. forms of easements, for
any mains that are required to provide service.
PFP-04-008
NOla Sub.PFP.doc
(.
\..~
( ..
P&Z Commission, Mayor & City Council
Nola Subdivision
Page 5
5. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via main line extensions to an existing main
adjacent to the property. A.pplicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of
easements, for any mains that are required to .provide service.
6. The City of Meridian reserves the right to acquire a permanent pedestrian easement, in the
favor of the City of Meridian, on the subject property in tb.e future, of sufficient width to
cover a IO-foot wide pathway along Locust Grove Road and East Pine Avenue.
7. Applicant shall be required to pay Pu.blic Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature o.n the final
plat per Resolution 02-374.
8. Revise or add the following notes on the face of the plat:
(5.) tcBuilding setbacks and dimensional standards in this subdivision shall be in
compliance with Title 11 and Title 12 of the Meridian Citv Code unless otherwise
modified bv Conditional Use Permit (CUP-04-025) which allowed for reduced lot
sizes and lot fronta~es~ "
(6.) liRe-word, responsibility lies with the business owner's association. n
(12.) HThe owner of each lot across which passes an irrigation/drainage ditch or pipe, is
responsible for the maintenance thereof; unless such responsibility has been
assumed by an irrigation/drainage district. "
(13.) HThe bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-inches
above the highest established normal groundwater elevation~ "
9.. Revise the Water Service Origin Statement in the Certificate of Owner's to sim.ply state
" . . . The City of Meridian, "l atcr Department"
10. Please sub.mit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's "Final" letter for tIle
street names and lot & block nUlnbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply.
11. Other tllan the access point specifically approved on East Pine A ve.nue with this application
by ACHD, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road or East Pine Avenue is prohibited.
12. Required landscape buffers/street improvements sllalI be made by the developer/subdivider
as part of the final plat.
13. Provide a recorded copy of the cross access agreement for Lots 1, 2, and 3 to utilize the new
drive access to East Pine Avenue.
GENERAL CONDITIONS (PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL PLAT)
1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent num.ber of cali:per inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that are
removed.
PFP-04-008
NOla Sub.PFP .doc
(.
(
\
P&Z Commission, Mayor & City Council
N'ola Subdivision
Page 6
2. Submit compaction test results to the Meridian Building Department for any building .pads
within lots receiving engineered backfill.
3. Underground year-round pressu.rized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this
develo.pment The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied
by a year-round source of water. The applicant proposes connection to City of Meridian
water for irrigation. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible
for the payment of assessments for the comm.on areas prior to signature on the final plat by
the City Engineer.
4. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will
percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and
including a 1 00- year storm event. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3: 1.
The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the
ground.water, soil type & and characteristics during tIle design and construction .phases.
5~ Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
6. Install 2S0-watt, high-pressure sodiu.m streetlights at locations designated. by the Public
Works Department Street light contractor shall obtain an approved design and .permit from
the Public Works Department prior to commencing installations.
7. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
8. All proposed fencing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
9. All sid.ewalks shall be constructed in accordance with MCC 12-5-2.K. Prior to signature of
the final plates), all sidewalks shall be constructed or a financial guarantee tbat said
improvements will be completed shall be provided.
10. A note shall be placed on the final plat stating tllat unless othetwise approved, all .building
setbacks shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance in effect at the time of building
permit submittal.
ll~ Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final
plat per Resolution 02-374.
12. Plat approval shall be subject to th.e expiration provisions set forth in MCC.
13. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, .pressurized
inigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, and road base approved
by the Ada County Hig11way District prior to applying for .building permits~ All developlnent
improvelnents shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy~ A
letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
PFP--04-008
NOla Sub.PFP4doc
{::-
Yo' .. .
(..... .
P&Z COlnmission, Mayor & City Council
Nola Subdivision
Page 7
pathways, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature
on the final plat.
14. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment.
15. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404
Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps ofEngineers~
16. A.pplicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting
that .may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
17. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat
or final plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
OTHER AGENCYIDEPARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1 ~ Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department
2. Final A.pproval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 12" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b~ The Fire l1ydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it
c~ Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d. :Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the
hydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants shall .be placed on comers.
f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside
radius~
4. Provide a 20' wide Fire Lane for all internal and external roadways.
5. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are
combustible construction begins.
required before
6. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with the International
Fire Code to service the proposed. project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 300'
apart.
7. TIle fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of tIle
development of this project .be equipped with Opticoln Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient
response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to
be borne by the developer~
8. All :processes & storage practices shall be required to comply with. tl1e International Fire Code.
PFP-04-008
NOla Sub~PFP.doc
(
P&Z Commission, Mayor & City Council
Nola Subdivision
Page 8
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
1. Prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance, that applicant shall submit an approved site plan
from sse.
MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT
1. Pathway and Trail standards: The .proposed pathway and/or trail s11all meet the standards as
set forth in the August 2003 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan, :pgs. 3-2 and
3-3, sections B & C.
2. Standard for City to assume Maintenance of a section of Pathway: The pathway must
connect from one major arterial to another, and either an easement or ownership deed must
be granted before the city will assume the maintenance of any section of pathway.
3. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Me.ridian Landscape
Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13-6) will be followed.
4. Standard Plan for Protectio.n of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard established
in the City of Meridian .Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13) will be followed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecomme.nds approval of the submitted Preliminary/Final Plat (PFP-04-008) application
with the above stated comments and conditions.
PFP~04-008
NOla. SUb4PFP~doc
/
(
Meridian Planning & Zonjng
January 6t 2005
Page 7 of 54
Rohm: Second.
Zaremba: There is a motion and a second.. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? That
motion passes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5:
Continued Public Hearing from December 2, 2004: PFP 04-008
Request for Preliminary/Final Plat approval for 4 building lots on 8.02
acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision by Bergey Land Surveying -
SWC of East Pine Avenue and North Nola Road:
Zaremba: The next Public Hearing is Item 5 and we'd like to reopen this continued
hearing. Again, this is PFP 04-008, and, again, there has been a request to continue
this until February 3rd for further information from the applicant. Anybody care to make
that motion or do we need some staff discussion on it before we do that?
Wilson: Chairman Zaremba, Members of the Commission, the only staff comment I
have is that we do request that you advise us what you would like us to do if we do not
receive the information requested ten days in advance of the next hearing. The options
being prepare a recommendation for denial or continue it another month.
Mae: We haven1t opened it--
Newton-Huckabay: Can I ask a question?
Zaremba: It is open. I believe I reopened it.
Newton-Huckabay: Has this one been continued three times?
Borup: No.
Newton-Huckabay: Two times?
Borup: I believe it's the first continuing.
Wilson: It was continued at the December 2nd hearing, so this would be the second
hearing.
Newton-Huckabay: Okay.
Borup: Mr. Chairman, that's a question I had. At that meeting there was discussion of
continuing it to the 16th and they thought that might be a little tight and that this meeting
would be plenty of time --
/"
(,
Meridian Planning & Zoning
January 6~ 2005
Page 8 of 54
Zaremba: My recollection was that the issues weren1t all that complicated and --
Borup: It needed to be surveyed, J believe. Basically.
Zaremba: Would we want to give the sense to the Commission that we will continue it
to February 3rd, but if it's -- jf staff does not have what they need ten days before that --
Wilson: Members of the Commission, I would also mention that the applicant is kind of
wavering on whether or not they will go through with this. So, that's just something to
consider.
Mae: Mr. Chairman, I guess I would wonder why we would want to set a date at all. I'd
like to see them get the materials and, then, we could set a date for thisf as opposed to
continuing it.
Zaremba: Well, the legal technicality is we have a noticed open Public Hearing.
Mae: Good point.
Zaremba: And you can only continue it to a date certain. The attorney was rising to say
something and I may have said what he was going to say.
Nary: Mr. Chairman, technically you're correct, your best off setting it to a date certain.
You1re not obligated to, but you would have to notice the hearing if you didnft. So,
you1re technically correct, you1re best setting to a date certain, specifically, and, then,
taking action.
Zaremba: J would entertain a motion continuing PFP 04-008 to February 2nd, 2005,
and instructing the staff to prepare denial if they do not have the required materials ten
days beforehand.
Rohm: That sounds perfect. So moved.
Wilson: Chairman Zaremba, it's the 3rd of February.
Rohm: The 3rd of February.
Zaremba: I was looking at the 3rd of February. If I said something else, I'm sorry. The
3rd of February.
Rohm: Does that work, rather than restate it? It doesn't need to be said again, I
wouldn't think. Anyway, I so move.
Borup: Second.
.t.
( ..
t..
\...
Merldian Planning & Zoning
January 6t 2005
Page 9 of 54
Zaremba: Keith Borup seconds. Okay. We have a motion and a second to continue to
February 3rd, 2005. All in favor? Anyopposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 6:
Public Hearing: PP 04-042 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 18
commercial building lots on 33.. 1 acres in a C-G zone for Boise Valley
Commons by Boise Valley Commons, LLC - 2200 East Overland Road:
Zaremba: Item No.6 is the next on our agenda and this is a Public Hearing. I'd like to
open the Public Hearing for PP 04-042, request for a preliminary plat approval of 18
commercial building lots on 33.1 acres in a C-G zone for Boise Valley Commons by
Boise Valley Commons, LLC, 2200 East Overland Road and we will begin with the staff
comments.
Canning: Chairman Zaremba, Members of the Commission, this is just a straight
preliminary plat. They have not asked for any reduction to city adopted dimensional
standards, so there is no planned development with this one today. The property, as
you see, is currently zoned C-G and it has 1-84 on its north boundary and, then,
Overland Road on the south boundary. It's currently vacant, but not really, because
there is a building with walls that are going to go up any day now under construction~
The subject of the subdivision is actually three different tax parcels, one of them being a
13.9 acre piece that was divided off through reduction in platting requirements, this
large parcel here, and that's where the new theater for Meridian is being constructed.
So, that -- one of the conditions of approval was that it be included as part of this plat
So, they are meeting that condition~ The property is shown as mixed use regional on
the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning is consistent with that. They have not asked
for the zoning, they already have the C-G zone~ And as I mentioned before, up to the
north is Interstate 84, to the south are the professional medical offices of Resolution
Subdivision, as well as the high school, Mountain View High School, all owned L-O. To
the east is vacant property, all zoned C-G, and to the west is the commercial tractor
sales and, then, Playground Subdivision. which is also zoned C-G. 11m going to move
forward to the special considerations listed on page four. Several of the properties do
not have direct access to a street. We have got two streets coming in. We have -- wait
a minute. Did I get them right? We have streets coming in here and, then, I believe this
will be Cinema Drive coming here, so it wjfl be a third street, but as you see towards the
north end of the property, they don1t have direct access to a public street, so we have
required a cross-access agreement across all the properties, so that they have that
ability to get through. This is Millennium and, then, that's Celebration~ There we go.
And, then, the fire marshal has provided a memo for tonight that I believe just got
handed out to you. These conditions do need to be added to this project, and, basically,
what the fire department wants the applicant to do -- there is a drive aisle noted on the
plat that goes to here, across and down, so that will be a common drive aisle for the
parking lot~ The way our ordinance is structured, they would not be able to call those a
private lane or a get private street name on those, so all the addressing will still be off
Cinema Drive, so the fire marshal has asked that they just place monuments -- I believe
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE
February 3, 2005
ITEM #
4
PROJECT NUMBER
PFP 04-008
PROJECT NAME
Nola Subdivision
NAME (PLEASE PRINT)
FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL I
(
~~~.
PFP 04-008
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING January 6,2005
APPLICANT Bergey Land Surveying ITEM NO. 5
REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from December 2, 2004 - Preliminary/Final Plat approva
for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision - SWC of East Pine
J
Avenue and North Nola Road
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DE?T:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTH ER:
See previous item packet / minutes
See memo for conHnuatlon
o J),.ill \'\ V.U
P I it- ~to
b. ~S)
YO
r:/(~ # S-"g~
-' to.../
Contacted:
ErnaUed:
Date: J.- ~ - D'S
,JtStaff Initials:
Phone:
(
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Josh Wilson, Associate City Planner
cc: Anna Canning, Angela Cornish, Project File
Datec January 3, 2005
Re: PreliminarylFinal Plat - Nola Subdivision (PFP-04-OO8)
t(l j~~ (j !~~ J_1V~~ 1)
DEe 2 9 200li
(.:]tv ()f hlcri tiiUJ1
(11'" t:'; f {'~ '1(:> rl.:.~""" {'-.Jt ffl c. (~
"<<--..-) .-: .r J ~.. .~ -..... . ....... \....... .. . -.../
Planning and Zoning Commission Members:
Staff has not received the additional information and revisions to the preJiminarylfinal
plat for Nola Subdivision requested of the applicant for the January 6, 2005 public
hearingw At the December 2, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission public
hearing. the item was continued due to insufficient information and absence of
required elements. The requested items are as follows:
. Proposed CCRJs for Nola Subdivision;
· Revised preliminary plat per the Staff Report dated November 24, 2004J and
per ACHD requirements;
· Revised final plat per the Staff Report dated November 24, 2004, and per
ACHD requirements;
· Detailed Landscape Plan for Lot 4;
Staff requests that the Commission continue the public hearing on the
preliminarylfinal plat for Nola Subdivision to a date one month in order for the
applicant to provide the requested items. Staff is unable to adequately evaluate or
condition the project until we have the requested items..
Staff would also request that you advise us on what you would like us to do if the
applicant has not provided the requested items ten (10) days in advance of the next
publiC hearing.. The options are: 1) continue the item another month 2) prepare a
recommendation for denial based on an incomplete application..
Sincerely J
Josh Wilson, Associate City Planner
1
(..
{: ..
~~~~~~.. ~ :..
Meridian Plannjng & Zoning Meeting
December 2 t 2004
Page 22 of 55
Canning: Mr~ Chairman, just so you all know, I spoke to his sister Mary DeChambeau
earlier today and she said she would inform him that -- of the hearing date on the 6th
and he might try and make that hearing date~
Borup: Okay~
Zaremba: And by that time I assume we will have copies of his memo. Mr. Chairman, I
move that we continue Public Hearing PP 04-040 to our regularly scheduled meeting of
January 6,20051 and that meeting will also be fe-noticed for that date.
Rohm: Second.
Borup: Okay~ Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borup: And as I look at this letter that was turned in, that was -- really, their comment
was why weren't they notified. So, that is being corrected.
Item 10:
Public Hearing: PFP 04-008 Request for Preliminary/Final Plat
approval for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola
Subdivision by Bergey Land Surveying - SWC or East Pine Avenue and
North Nola Road:
Borup: Okay~ Next item is Public Hearing PFP 04-008, a request for preliminary/final
plat approval for four building lots and 8~02 acres in an J-L zone for Nola Subdivision~
Like to open this hearing at this time and start with the staff report.
Wilson: Chairman Borup, Members of the Commission, Nola Subdivision is located at
the corner of East Pine Avenue and North Nola Road and is zoned Light Industrial. The
proposal is for a four-lot subdivision. It has come in as a preliminary/final plat request.
The southern most Lot 4 has an existing structure, which is used for Oak Harbor
Freight The northern portion of the subdivision contains three lots with frontage on
East Pine Avenue and Nola Road on the east. Locust Grove is scheduled for
improvements. Itls on ACHD1s five-year work program for extension to the west of this
subdivision, requiring a 96-foot right of way for the associated improvements to Locust
Grove Road~ Along with that, the intersection of Locust Grove and Pine will be
improved and widened onto a portion. Pine will be improved on a portion of this -- of
this property to the east of the intersection and it1s staff's understanding that there has
been some recent developments with the applicant and ACHD regarding the design and
the right of way requirements along East Pine Avenue across north of this property and
we anticipate that a revised preliminary plat will be submitted. I have to apologize for
the large draft across the front page of this~ There was, actuallY1 supposed to be a
water mark and read it -- so, it was supposed to be there, but that page was supposed
to be readable, so apologize for that. I can get to the specifics in them, but we are
recommending a continuation of this upon resolution of some of the outstanding issues
(
Meridian Planning & Zoning Meeting
Decem be r 21 2004
Page 23 of 55
that were raised pretty late in the process that we didn't have time to address. So, the
idea being that the staff report is in draft form and will be revised for your next hearing.
So, I apologize for the un-readability of that. Just some issues to touch on and I'll let the
applicant address their discussions with ACHD regarding the changes along Pine.
Some key things are only one access will be allowed along Pine Avenue requiring
cross-access agreements to those -- to the three lots for the ingress and egress. I think
one small change from the staff report, ACHD in their report did recommend closing the
shared drive along Nola, if it's not going to be utilized. I think in the staff report I said
that they recommend to continue use sharing that, but the submitted site plan does
appear to not be utilizing that, so I do recommend closing that, if thafs the case. A
couple other things. The required landscape easement along Locust Grove Road on
the preliminary plat submitted is not shown extending on to Lot 4~ That does need to
extend along the full length of Locust Grove Road onto Lot 4 and also the same on Nola
Road, which is a small required easement, but it also does need to extend to the south
of the property considered for the plat. Along the same veinJ a detailed landscape plan
also is not provided for Lot 4 and we have requested that that be provided as part of the
application. We did get a detailed landscape plan for the northern three lots, but we do
require one for Lot 4 to the south. The existing structure does need to be brought to the
same standards along those roads and required buffers as the newly platted lots, so we
do need that plan to be able to analyze that~ The City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan
future land use map does depict a multi-use pathway along the east boundary of this
property along Nola Road. It has come -- it has come to my attention that Nola Road
will be cul-de-sac'd to the south of this property upon extension of Locust Grove Road,
the idea being that no additional railroad crossings are granted, so to gain the Locust
Grove crossing they need to eliminate the NoJa Road crossing, therefore, making the
location of the multi-use pathway a little bit unrealistic or difficult along Nola Road,
because it would have to have a crossing of the railroad. We feel that it -- looking at
ACHDIS plans and the future of the site, that it makes more sense for a multi-use
pathway to be along Locust Grove Road and, then, possibly along the south side of
Pine for a connection to other pathways in the area and we anticipate working with
ACHD on that issue and as a condition we have included an easement -- that the city
does reserve the right to acquire an easement where ever that may work out in the
future. So, just in summary, the staff does recommend that this is continued for the
submittal of some revised information, revised preliminary and final plat. The applicant
does -- is required to submit some CC&Rs as well for the development and -- and the
changes to the landscape plan and upon submission of those we will prepare a revised
staff report and address some of these issues more adequately and with that IIJI end
staff's comments.
Borup: Questions for staff at this point?
Mae: No.
Zaremba: ML Chairman, I actually have one for Mr~ Freckleton~ We have a copy of a
memo requesting that they allow to hook up to city water full time for their irrigation. Do
we need to have an opinion on that or do you have an opinion on that?
(
Meridian PJanning & Zoning Meetjng
Decem bar 2, 2004
Page 24 of 55
Freckleton: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Zaremba, the applicant and I have talked about
this -- the dilemma that they have being on the -- basically the bottom end of a ditch,
having intermittent flows, and her discussions with the irrigation district and it was my
recommendation that she get it in writing and get it submitted as part of this packet, so
that it can go to City Council. They are the ones that can -- have to make the -- take
action on that~ For the small amount of landscaping that they have here and given the
condition that they have, I think that it -- that it probably warrants the varjance~ One
provision that we do have in our ordinance, though, if a variance is granted for them not
to have a pressurized irrigation system, they would be subject to paying well
development fees, so we tack that on when this goes forward to Council.
Zaremba: Thank you~
Borup: Anyone else? Would the applicant have a presentation they'd like to make?
Cornish: Hi. My name is Angela Comish and JIm actually the civil engineer that's
helping working on this project and just quickly to help you understand a little bit about
why we had the variations with ACHD is we had originally had gone in there to meet
with them and tell them what we were going to do and the person I spoke with I don't
think was aware of how soon this project would take place on Locust Grove and Pine,
the improvements. So, I was under the impression that I needed to make those
improvements around the side and I worked quite diligently to work on that and, then,
last week they brought me in and said here is the plans that are already done and they
are actually looking at construction in possibly 2007 ~ So, it's really silly for me to work
on putting in -- you know, widening the road and putting in curb, gutter, and sidewaJk,
when they are going to turn around and rip it out within a year or so. So, that's why we
have the variation in the roadway width and the right of way, stuff that we just need to
get revised as far as the preliminary and final plats~ So, it's not major changes, it1s more
or less moving a right of way line probably in onto the lot a little bit further than what it is
right now. As far as the Lot No. 4 with the building on it, I'm not the surveyor, but
somehow during this whole process we went from three lots and that one got added at
some point~ So, I don't know exactly how that worked out~ I think the owner actually
owned that one at one time, too, I'm not sure, but somehow that got added into there, so
that's why there isn't the easements and things that are shown on that and I think the
surveyor thought ifs existing, it's theret it already has the landscaping and things, and
he probably didn1t realize that that needed to be added to that, so we will get that taken
care of.
Mae: What kind of a time frame are you going to need to get these changes taken care
of and come back?
Cornish: Pretty quickly. We are already working on them.
Rohm: But you're in concurrence that a continuance is in order?
(.::.:.....'..
Meridian Planning & Zoning Meeting
December 21 2004
Page 25 of 55
Cornish: By all means.
Rohm: Okay. That's--
Zaremba: I think the question on the timing, if we rescheduled this or continued it to our
meeting on the 16th, you would have to have all these materiaJs to staff this coming
Monday. Is that workable? They need ten days to spread it around to all the people
they need to spread it around to.
Cornish: Ten days?
Zaremba: Well, my question to you is will you be ready to get it --
Cornish: (know. JIm the engineer, though, (1m not their surveyor, and I worried about
speaking for him. I believe he could probably do that, but I just wanted to check with -- I
wanted confirmation from the folks over there. Do you have to have it truly by Monday?
Wilson: We would prefer ten days. It would definitely be preferable.
Zaremba: Would everybody be more comfortable if we were talking about the 6th of
January, instead of the 16th of December?
Wilson: I believe so, depending on the appJicanfs time frame, but, yeah, I think so.
Zaremba: Okay.
Cornish: We probably ought to do that, then.
Zaremba: Okay~ Because they do everything ten days before, so --
Cornish: That makes good sense. And as far as the irrigation, I talked with Bruce about
it and I talked with the guys at N~mpa-Meridian and they are like, you know, we just
can't guarantee you water, we are sorry, but you're at the end of the line. So, thaes why
we approached it that way. Thank you.
Borup: Okay. Do we have a date to continue it to?
Rohm: I think before we do that, though, shouldnlt we see if there is anybody else?
Borup: Yes. Do we have any public testimony on this application? Okay.
Mae: Mr. Chairman, I move that we close the Public Hearing.
Zaremba: No. We want to continue it.
(.
(
Meridian Pia nn i ng & Zoning Meeting
December 2, 2004
Page 26 of 55
Mae: Oh. Excuse me. You're right. That's what I wanted to do. I knew that all along.
So, let me start that over, then. ML Chairman, I move that the Public Hearing on PFP
04-008 be continued to the regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
January 6, 2005.
Zaremba: Second.
Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borup: Okay. Is the Commission okay to continue on or do you need a short break?
Zaremba: We could take five minutes.
Borup: Okay. We will take a short break at this time and, then, continue on.
(Recess. )
Item 11:
Public Hearing: CUP 04-050 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
3-story, 100-room hotel in an I-L zone for Country Inn & Suites Hotel by
Boise Hotel Enterprises, LLC & ABC 2, LLC - north of East Pine Avenue
and east of North Eagle Road:
Borup: Okay~ Ladies and gentlemen, we'd like to continue our meeting this evening.
Next item is Public Hearing CUP 04-050, request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
three story one hundred room hotel in an I-L zone for Country Inn and Suites Hotel.
This is at north of East Pine Avenue and east of North Eagle Road. Open this hearing
at this time and weld like to start with the staff report.
Wilson: Chairman Borup, Members of the Commission, this application is for a Country
Inn Suites, a three story, 1 00 room hotel, located in a Light Industrial zone near the
intersection of Eagle Road and East Pine -- or Pine Avenue. The subject property was
annexed in 1984 by Upland Industries and was -- is subject to a development
agreement recorded at that time. There has also been two planned unit developments
on the property, one in 1991 and one in 1999 and both allowing a mix of commercial
and residential uses in the subdivision. In the I-L zone a hotel would not normally be a
allowed use, because of the planned -- the planned development CUP. It does expand
on the uses allowed within the subdivision. To the -- to the north of the project -- 1111 get
a better visual here. To the north of the project is the Crossroads shopping center. To
the east is a residential subdivision, Crossroads Subdivision, zoned R-4, and to the --
well, the location of the hotel, the proposed hotel, is in the southeast corner of the
property here directly adjacent to the residential subdivision. The site is proposed to
have 106 parking spots. Staff does raise a question whether that's adequate. One
hundred and six would be adequate for the -- one is required per room, so there are 1 00
stalls required for the 1 00 rooms and, then, thereafter, one parking spot for every two
(:..
(/...:--
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
RECE.I'TSn
JAN _.~ ~ _A,}
c~ of Meridian
City Clezk Office
DATE
January 6, 2005
ITEM #
5
PROJECT NUMBER
PFP 04-008
PROJECT NAME
Nola Subdivision
i I I
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
-[D.f\ \J t'0 t-\<2-e t<<Z-K
(" "
{...
/~
~".
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE
March 15,2005
ITEM #
12
PROJECT NUMBER
PFP 04-008
PROJECT NAME
Nola Subdivision
I I AGAINST I
NA~E-IPLEASE PRINT) FOR I NEUTRAL
J:tJ!i Li J!i 1 V J:!i D
t~AR 1 5 2005
.-". ... ..... ... .
.'l,;.l1:Y QT. :'V r: I.. a_
City Clerk Office
(
(~:.:... .
March 11, 2005
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15,2005
APPLICANT
REQU EST W oter, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies
ITEM NO.
19
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DE?T:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEITLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
\
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the CIIy of Meridian..
Phone:
(. .
(
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF
Schedule for March 16, 2005
Cycle 1
. '.~ ~'::'U:~; Jr~~ J['-V~h; 1
i.,..: .:\..:.":' f 5 2005
i. : i ~:~~.: i,~i~;:j~;8W1E~~
MAYOR: Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-21,
delinquent water users shall have the right to request a pre
termination hearing prior to water service being
disconnected. No water users having requested such pre-
termination hearing for March 15, 2005, water service for
the attached turn-off list will be terminated on March 16,
2005. The total amount of the tum-offlist is $36,536.63. ~
//.
{"
CITY OF MERiDIAN Delinquent Accoun t ListM council Page: 1
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 1 5, 2005 02:55pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDerinquent Barance
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer. Cust No () = {<} 880000001
Customer. B ill Cycre = 1
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-OeJinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
244 04.0552~ 1 ABBEY BEN 74.34 31453 42.81 02125/2005 42.69 -
23.0244990.4 ABDERHALDEN~ RICHARD 59442 46.57 1 2.85 02/15/2005 75rOO -
23.02.1 930.2 ACUNAt J ULl 0 & 46.1 0 31 .64 14~46 02/14/2005 80.00 -
30~ 74.2668.1 ADAMS1CATHY 96rgO 42~81 54.09 02114/2005 50433 ~
30~ 74.3602.2 ADAMS, CYNTHrA 58.48 23~ 1 9 35.29 01/26/2005 114.48 -
23~ 02~ 0428.2 ADLERt J USTrN 224~63 128.85 95~ 78 0211 712005 84.16 -
20.46.4602~ 1 ALBERTSONS 2,447.10 1 ~195.35 1.251 ~ 75 01/18/2005 1 , 195~35 -
22.50.0244.1 ALGERt BRENT 51.14 25.92 25.22 02107/2005 9241 a -
37 .37 ~2904. 1 ALL AM ERI CAN CONSTRUCTIOl 64.23 17.70 17. 70 21400 7.83
37.37~324a42 ALLEN. MARK & MICHELLE 69.36 47~78 21 ~58 03/08/2005 45.00 M
37~37.382241 ALLEN t SCOTT 91 ~67 35.29 35.29 21 .09 01/18/2005 45.00 -
35.35.01 94.4 ALLMONDt JOSEPH & TAKEIA 86.38 49.12 3 7 ~ 26 02125/2005 50400 -
36.68.0278.1 ALVAREZ, ell FF 70.58 35r29 35.29 01/13/2005 35.29 M
23~02.0B88. 1 ANDERSONrDEAN 61 ~ 72 25.22 36.50 02111/2005 25.22 -
25.25.401 O~2 ANGSTMAN~ T~J~ 65.48 32474 32.74 02101/2005 75. 78 -
23402.6300.1 ANSONt PATRICIA 92.92 44402 48.90 02122/2005 40 ~ 00 -
24.04~ 1664.3 ANSON, RICK & REBECCA 140.11 81.53 58~58 02122/2005 120.00 -
46.60.0010.3 ARMSTRONG1 JAMES & NANCY 35.16 21 .46 13. 70
23.01.1510.4 AROUYET1 GILBERT & MARIA 122.22 1 04.50 17.72
30. 7 4~3532. 2 ASMUSS EN ~ J USTJ N 53.38 20 ~ 64 32~74 01/24/2005 28.98 -
36~69.0530.1 A TCHI SON t JEFFERY 119~38 72~81 46.57 02/16/2005 84.64 -
30.7443660.2 ATHERTON~ NOBLE 107.03 55.15 51488 02/17/2005 141.50 -
30. 7 4~3698.3 ATTEBERRY. SHELLY 97.90 29.07 68483 02/25/2005 16~OO -
22.51.3370~ 1 ATWOOD. GINO] 77.62 41.12 36.50 02111/2005 36.50 -
37.37.3616.2 AUSTf N, WJ LLfAM & DOROTHY 28.71 27.77 r94 01/1 2/2005 80.00 -
23.01 ~ 1040.2 AZEVEDO, JOE & HEATHER B8~52 60~66 27.86 03/01/2005 50400 -
304 74~0844~ 1 B AND V, L.L~C. 70.38 33.31 37~O7 01/28/2005 33~31 ..
30.74.2554.2 BAS fCH, TI M & YELENA 85.62 39.05 46.57 01/1 8/2005 46.57 M
24.04.1290.3 BACON~THOMAS & JANIS 153.02 49. 12 56.64 47.26 01/21/2005 50.00 -
30. 7 4.3364~2 BAECHT ~ CARL R. 63.22 24.1 7 39.05 01/1 8/2005 73.36 ..
46.46.7002.2 BAILEY. MI CHAEL & AU N DREA 120.74 36.50 40.26 40.26 3.72
22. 51 .0694~ 1 BAJLEY1 PEGGY 127498 4 7 ~82 47.78 32.38 03/15/2005 1 00.00 -
234 02.3550~2 BAILEYt PEGGY 72~82 72~81 401 03/07/2005 54.09 -
2245042142.3 BARAJASt ANTONIO & VELMA 162~46 84.60 77.86 02115/2005 62~B2 ..
30.74.3604.3 BARBEY. RODNEY & RHONDA 72.34 24.56 47.78 02114/2005 4.00 ..
22.50.2164.2 BARB EY ~ STEVE & LAURI E 91.90 55.40 36.50 02/14/2005 28.98 -
22.50.2360.3 BARBEYl STEVEN 100. 19 33.37 27.77 39.05 12/15/2004 41483 -
23.01.2790~4 SARI NSKY. CYNTH IA 169.28 77.67 54.09 17.70 19.82
23.01.2110.2 BARROET AS ENA, PHYLLIS 1 01.68 30.66 28.98 21 .46 20.58 01/18/2005 40.00 -
23.02.04 72.1 BARTHI JEFF 55~B8 26~ 90 28.98 01/14/2005 56.98 -
25. 25~ 1 07842 BARTON, RANDY & JUDITH 66.82 27.77 39~ 05 03/01/2005 35.29 -
22. 51 ~ 0932.1 SA YVI EW - KELLOGG 60.1 0 26.23 33.87 01/26/2005 22.59 -
21.49~ 090242 BBZ INC 58.72 25.22 33.50 12/2312004 30.98 -
22.50.102241 BEACH~ROXANNE 129.38 93.12 36.26 0211712005 60400 -
20.4640258.1 BEAMGUARD, LISA 81 .90 43.67 38.23 02108/2005 85.62 -
31.52.0700.2 8 ECKt 81 LL 43.24 32. 70 1 0.54
22.51.3080.3 B EEB E. M ELI NDA 54.18 29468 24.50 01/21/2005 29.00 -
24.04.1208.2 BEHRENDS10ALE 120.91 39.05 42.81 39.05 01/07/2005 44r61 -
24.04.201047 BELAI Rt 0 ENN r s 37.62 17.70 14.22 5~70 12/21/2004 113.87 -
22.20.0076~2 BENGOECHEAtTOMASA 61.96 30.43 31.53 01/14/2005 73.94 ~
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( (.-..
CITY OF M ERI DIAN Delinq uent Account List- cou ncil Page: 2
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 02:56pm
Current Period: 03120/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent BaJance
Last Pmt Last Pm!
Cust No Name Sa lance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22.51 ~2622.1 BENTLEY t DONALD 372.20 121 .56 125~32 125.32 01/2412005 121 .56 -
20146401 06.2 B ERKHEI S ER. RYAN 55.80 32423 23~57 01/31/2005 55.00 M
25.25~9932~2 BJLLI NGS t RA YMOND & DELANA 158~43 35.29 76.57 46.57 01/21/2005 91 ~ 18 -
37. 72~O256.2 BIRDGE. RICHARD & TONI 85.62 39.05 46.57 01/1 8/2005 87.95 -
24.03~O328~2 BISHOP. JEFFREY 111.86 35~29 76.57 01/19/2005 95.84 -
46~60.0018.1 BISHOP, LARRY & TAMI 35.89 31 .43 4~46
24.04.1140~2 BLASER1GLENN 74.34 35.29 39~ 05 01/21/2005 89.46 -
37 ~37 .3842.2 BLEDSOE, STEPHANI E 64.67 35.29 29~3a 01/21/2005 60.00 -
23~O2.1580.2 BLESSENGER, RONNJE & HAZE 67 ~88 41.12 26.76 02115/2005 "61488 -
30.74. 2332~2 BOBKO. RAYMOND 1 OO~66 46.57 54.09 01/04/2005 152.58 -
22.50.1726.2 BOES] G ER~ MAX: 117.46 37.36 36~50 28498 14.62 01/05/2005 85~OO -
30.30.6050 r2 BONNEY1 AARON B 1.78 27.77 54~O1 01/21/2005 223~21 -
30~ 7440660.2 BOSSART ~HI LL. CANDACE 123.69 10.29 113~40 1 0/18/2004 85.70 -
37. 72.0206~4 SOYERt KEITH 40~50 20.25 20.25 01/21/2005 20.25 .-
30.74.3256.2 BRADYtMARK 64.23 26. 13 38410 01/2712005 40 ~ 00 ~
22~50.1988.4 BRANDTt M. & WIEDENHEFT. A. 86.88 40.14 44.02 2.72 02123/2005 39.34 ~
22.50.2194.2 8 RAUNt STEPHAN I E 78.36 56490 21.46 02/17/2005 53.22 -
22~50~4272. 1 BREEDLOVE, ANGELA 63.06 31 .53 31 .53 01/1 8/2005 82~52 ..
30~ 74.397442 BREEN ~ RI CHARD 69447 25r 15 42.81 1.51 01/1212005 75~OO -
23~01.0800~ 1 BREWER, SID & SHELL Y 82.93 82.40 .53 03/14/2005 51 ~OO ..
23.02~3370.4 SRI GGSt TERf 143.48 67.92 40~26 35~ 30 02114/2005 50.00 ..
23.01 ~351 0.4 B RI NEGAR~ E~ E~ 11 0.52 66.50 44.02 02116/2005 77.64 -
23. 02~ 1290.5 B RI N EGAR. E. E~ 111.38 44.88 66450 02128/2005 33.00 -
23.02~ 1650.1 BRINEGAR, E~E. 80.62 59.27 21.35 0211 6/2005 60.00 -
24~04. 1762.3 BRUNGERt LI NDA 124~34 27. 77 96.57 01/27/2005 68.23 -
30. 74.3618~4 BURNS, EMMETT 19.99 17.70 2.29
24404.2308~ 1 BUTTERFJELD. CHARLES & TOf\ 247430 87 r93 159~37 01/21/2005 166481 -
22~51 ~ 0298~2 BYEtDEANNA 65.36 32.62 32.74 02108/2005 68.42 M
30.74.2508.1 C W CONSTRUCTION 59r68 29.84 29~B4 01/18/2005 29.84 -
22.50,0726.2 C.F~14 INVESTMENTS 59~ 64 34442 25.22 02/22/2005 25.22 -
22.50.0724. 1 C. F .1. INVESTMENTS 70~26 25.92 25.22 19412 01/24/2005 50 ~ 00 ~
30~ 74.0396.2 CADAt ROSE 63.06 31.53 31453 02128/2005 39.05 -
30. 74.0400~ 1 CADAtROSE 66.82 31 .53 35.29 02128/2005 35.29 ~
23.02.0498.1 CADE~ CHRISTOPHER 183.38 63484 119.54 03/01/2005 122~9B -
23.02r5870.4 CALDERONt TRACY & CARLOS 92.66 48~64 44.02 01/18/2005 44~ 02 -
35.35.0106.2 CAMPAGNJt DAVJD 79~38 36.50 42.88 02/15/2005 90.00 -
30.30~6280.2 CAMPBELLt ROBERT 75.29 25.15 50. 14 01/26/2005 43.00 -
35~ 65. 037043 CARDIN, JEFF & GROUT~ BETH 39.06 39.05 .01 02125/2005 46.56 -
35.65.068841 CARPENTERt GAIL 51 .78 24~O1 27 ~ 77 02101/2005 72.38 -
36.69.1122.2 CARTER1 J.R~ 51.15 46457 4.58 03/01/2005 55 ~ 00 ~
35~65~O608.2 CARV ALLOt TERI 49~59 25.22 24.37 02128/2005 33.00 -
23.02.6850.2 CASE, STEVEN 58.24 36.38 21486 03/01/2005 45.00 -
30~ 74~O680.2 CAS Ht MICHAEL 46.68 21 .46 25422 02109/2005 8.56 -
22.50~ 031 0.2 CASSt BRUCE C 98r22 21 .46 28~98 47.78 01/04/2005 119.02 -
24.03~O850.2 CAST1 PETER & VERIONICA 84r67 39405 45L62 02117/2005 40 ~ 00 -
30.74.3808.1 CHAMBERS.ARON 68.94 26413 42.81 02101/2005 46.57 -
22.50.3726.2 CHANDLER~ NICKI E 94.80 37.20 40.26 17.34 01/3112005 75.00 -
24~O3.0070.1 CHANDLER-ZUN DELt P A TRI CIA 91.76 39.05 42~81 9.90 02115/2005 70rOO -
24.03.0098.2 CHAPMAN1 P A TRI CIA & P A TRI CI 90.26 17.70 17 . 70 17.70 37& 16 12/06/2004 39. 12 -
32.32.4084.2 CHAPPELL~ JOHN 133.00 66.50 66.50 02116/2005 52.74 -
30~ 7442850~ 1 CHEESBROUGH1 JAMES G. 70.74 24.17 46~57 0212212005 42481 -
23~O2~470012 CHENEY, STEVEN 157430 43.90 77. 78 35.62 01121/2005 65.00 -
23.02.61 00.1 CHENEYtSTEVEN 80~40 43.90 36~50 03/0212005 30.60 -
30. 7 4~3676.4 CHENEYtSTEVEN 123.64 53.38 70.26 01/19/2005 113.24 -
30.74.3020.2 CHERRY t DARREL 62r24 23.19 39.05 02101/2005 90.21 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
("". . (........... .
"( ..
CI TY OF MERI DIAN Delinquent Account List~ council Page: 3
Standard Payment Customers Mar 151 2005 02:56pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No DeUnquent Minimum AmountDeJinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeUnq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22.50.050043 CHESTERtFAYE 59.00 34~42 24458 03/01/2005 30.00 -
35.35~O216.1 CHRISTENS EN1 S. G. 26~O4 25.04 1.00 03fO 7120 05 25. 04 ~
37.3743314.1 CHRISTIAN BROS 13~54 9.27 3.48 .79
37 .37 .3268~ 1 CHRISTJAN BROS CONSTRUCTI 12+59 8.77 3~48 ~34
22451.1174.2 CHRrSTIANSON, ARTH U R & GOI 75.1 B 48.83 26.35 02116/2005 131.78 -
22~51 ~ 1170.2 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR & CO I 48.86 . 37455 11.31 02116/2005 64. 1 0 ...
36.68.0100.3 CLARK. BR1AN 48.40 44.02 4438 01/18/2005 83~OO -
25.25.0160~2 CLARK. CORTNEY 57 ~96 25.22 32.74 01J27/2005 28498 -
36.6940872.2 CLARKJ GORDON & JENNJFER 77.41 44.02 33r39 0211 012004 480.00 -
37.3744222.3 CLARK~ KI MB RA 65.48 32.74 32.74 01/12/2005 108.40 -
24~O4.1248.3 CLAYt STEVEN & SUSAN 54.09 50.33 3.76 02115/2005 46.57 -
25~ 25.4056.1 CLEVENGER, PATRICK & KUMlr 70~58 31.53 39r05 01/1 812005 80.88 -
25.0540344.1. Cll FF t DWJ GHT 124~ 9 7 84417 40.80 03/14/2005 70.00 ..
46.17.0708~2 CLrNTON ~ GARRY & JERIL YN PL 66.24 62~82 3~42
35r35.0189.2 CLOUGH J R. G4 & PAM 57.96 28.98 28.98 03/09/2005 32.74 -
29. 07 rOa92~3 CLUPHF ~ CHRI S 45.74 28.98 16. 76 03/0212005 60.00 -
22.5140874.1 COLEt ORVILLE 80~58 46466 33.92 02115/2005 50400 -
24.0440888.1 CONN ELL~ 0 I ON 120.80 60.40 60~ 40 01/26/2005 77 . 38 -
23.02.19204 1 CONRAD I, LINDA 159.44 B9r 10 70.34 02117/2005 1 04. 1 0 ...
30.30.6018~2 CONWAYt JOHN & ELAINE 57.70 28.98 2B~ 72 01/21/2005 33;00 - .
23402.310042 COPE, WI LLfAM & REBECCA 81 .38 41~12 40.26 02/01/2005 32.24 -
23.01 ~O210.1 CORDINGLEY~ MRS LARRY 69.18 51.42 17.76 02125/2005 25.30 ...
30.74.3212.1 COREY BARTON BUILDERS 55.50 26.52 28.98 02122/2005 44.02 ..
22~50.1412.2 CORP j WESLEY 37r45 23.06 14r39 09/22/2004 100.00 -
24~O4.1746.1 COSGROVEt AMY 1 08.1 0 65.29 42.81 02116/2005 72481 -
25~O5.0662.2 CRANE, JACK 96.90 42.81 54 ~ 09 01/1 8/2005 88.56 M
37.72.0228~3 CRON I STERj DA VI D & TERESA 55~80 54.09 1.71
20.47.1178.2 CROWl JEFFREY 88. 18 4 7 ~66 40.52 01/26/2005 40.00 -
22.51 .0742.2 CRUMt SCOTT & BECKY 68~ 14 35440 32.74 01/31/2005 32.74 ~
22~51 ~3260.1 CRW HOLDINGS LLC 226.24 112~oa 11 O~40 3.76 02/25/2005 1 06.64 -
24.04~06B6.2 DA ROSA~ JULI E 135.16 68.58 66.58 02116/2005 55.30 -
23.02.0910.1 DAILEY1 DON 54.56 44.88 9.68 02128/2005 35.42 -
22. 50.0284~3 DALEtMARK 52.22 21418 17.70 13~34 12/21/2004 20 ~ 00 -
37437 r292042 DALEY. NEAL 73~90 44.02 29488
2 2~ 50.385 2 ~ 2 D'AMICO. JENNIFER 84.86 30.66 28.98 25.22 01/04/2005 27.82 ..
20.46.0316.3 DANAHA. STEPHEN 49.53 36~97 12.56
36.69.1646.1 DANE BARLOW 157.04 148 . 71 4.85 3448
24.03.0078.2 DAVIS. LORAN & SHANNON 55.07 39.05 16.02 02115/2005 1 00.00 -
22.50.028846 DAWSONt CAROL 102.96 25.92 51 ~46 25.58 01/21/2005 1 00.00 -
37.72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STJNE 78.1 0 39.05 39.05 01/19/2005 84.64 w
23.02.1610.1 DESILETt DENICE 66.46 32.62 28~ 98 4.86 01/26/2005 25.00 ...
23.02~ 1960.1 DICKSON, DONALD M 133r90 45.86 4 7 L 78 40.26 12/13/2004 119~46 ~
30r30.6142.2 DILECCE~ COSIM 0 70.80 17.70 1 7 . 70 17470 1 7.70 11/18/2004 53.88 -
35.65.041642 OlLECCEJ JOE & TERESA 74.34 31453 42.81 01/19/2005 74.34 -
22.50~0204~ 1 01 P AOLA, JONA THAN 64~ 90 35~40 29.50 02109/2005 30.00 -
24r 03.0720.1 DOBARAN, JOHN & ARVELLA 22.62 11 .31 11.31 02122/2005 11.31 -
24.04.1554.1 DOLL. THOMAS 140.68 47.78 92~90 01/13/2005 136~84 -
24.044 1166.3 DONALDSON, NEAL 76~ 76 32.74 44.02 01/28/2005 99.24 -
24.03~0830 ~ 1 DONLON, KATHRYN 1 05.87 31 .53 35.29 39.05 12/28/2004 61.42 -
37.37.3302.1 DONNELL Yt scan & MARLA 73498 25~22 25~22 15.13 8441
30. 74L 1062.1 DOTY. PAULINE & RON 72424 51 .28 20.96 02122/2005 88.00 -
35~ 65.0422.2 DREXLER, ADRIAN 63.06 31 .53 31.53 02101/2005 24401 -
24.0441312.2 DRIPPS, NICHOLE 89~38 42.81 46~57 02104/2005 9541 0 -
24.04.2282r 1 DRURY1 PATRICK 1 08.4 7 46.57 61.90 02/17/2005 65.00 -
35.35.0036.3 DUARTE1RACHEL 119.90 36450 40426 43.14 12/21/2004 115.00 w
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
f:~
~
CITY OF M ERrOIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 02:57pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Derinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent BaJance
Last Pml Last Pmt
Cust No Name Sa lance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
36.6840102.2 DURHAMtKYLE 76.65 31.53 31 ~53 13.59 12/14/2004 125.00 ...
24.04.0886.1 DUVALLt DEBORAH 61 ~69 31 .53 30.16 01/21/2005 65.00 -
23. 02~50 1 0.1 EARLEY. GEORGE 54. 18 25~22 28~96 03/1 0/2005 29~OO ..
30.744 11 08.1 EDDY, DENNIS 68.88 32.56 36.32 02101/2005 36.32 -
21 .484 1632~2 EDDYS BAKERY 139.85 72~42 67 . 43 01/28/2005 72.42 -
21 .48.1633.1 EDDY.S BAKERY ~52 .52 "01/18/2005 3.48 -
30474.3678.2 EDWARDS, DEARL W 117.57 26.13 50~33 41.11 01/26/2005 45.00 ..
23~O2.2734.1 EDWARDS, MJCHAEL A B6~ 18 39 ~ 16 36r50 10.52 01/24/2005 70~ 00 -
22.51.2992.1 ELD, LARRY 112.08 26.08 41~ 12 44.88 01/13/2005 61.12..
22~ 51 ~O758.1 ELITE CLEAN ERS 41 O~65 141.75 140.09 128.81 01/04/2005 253r86 ~
21.48~4850.1 ELIXI R INDUSTRI ES 39.40 38.42 .98 02128/2005 37.44 -
37.72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO 200~OD 200.00 03/11/2005 116.30 -
22.50.051442 ELLrOlT. KIMBERLY 68~ 14 39416 28~ 98 01/18/2005 4.00 -
30.74.3200.1 ENGLUN D. MIKE 64.20 25.15 39.05 01/1812005 73.36 -
23.02.1940.1 EPLEY. RITA 82.78 49. 78 33.00 02/28/2005 45.00 -
22.50.123842 ERHART. MILT 1 05.34 9.90 21 .46 73.98 10/19/2004 127.82 ..
22. 50r 1232~2 ERHART. MIL TON 48~66 33444 15.22 03/15/2005 40.00 -
23.02.0320.1 ESTEP. NINA 68.70 32.74 35.96 02/08/2005 33400 -
23~0242430.2 " ETJENNE~ LUCRETIA 67.78 35~22 32.56 01/26/2005 52.86 ..
32~32.4386~2 EV ANSI DANI EL. RHONDA " 76.76 · 36.50 40~ 26 02115/2005 40.26 -
30~ 74.2688.1 EV ANSI STEVEN & KRIS ITE 88.04 40~26 47.78 01/1 9/2005 120~82 -
22~51 .0406.1 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BAN~ 245.62 123.40 122.22 02/28/2005 38~4 7 ..
35.65.0262~2 FENWl CK. J. & LOGAN ~ SHERYL 39~40 1 7.70 17. 70 4400
22.50.026047 FIELDSTAD, CHRISn' 78.66 49.68 28.98 02115/2005 80.25 -
22. 50~O290~5 FIELDSTAD, CHRISTY 52~ 12 34.42 17.70 01/1312005 95~ 78 -
30. 74.2568.2 FI NLEY. JEFFREY 162~O6 32.74 81 ~54 47~78 01/19/2005 76.06 ·
37. 7240274~ 1 FJTZGERALD, JUANITA 99.32 47~78 51 ~54 01/1 8/2005 44.02 ..
23.0141160~2 FLATEN r BOB 76.64 36~38 40426 01/25/2005 32~ 74 ..
2044 7 .0008~ 1 FLAn~ BRIAN & BRANDY 1 04.46 55~93 48.53 02107/2005 44.61 -
29407.0878.2 FOL WELLt RITA 70.22 31 .35 38rB? 02108/2005 35.11 -
21.4a~2696.1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 500. 14 233. 15 266.99 02115/2005 195.55 -
21 .48.269441 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 2.320~ 22 1 ~069 .86 1 ~250. 36 0211512005 1 ,43a~38 -
30.30L6212~2 FORSTERt PAMELA 136.53 25415 72.81 38.57 01/19/2005 1 00.00 ..
35435. 1414.3 FOX, ERICK 73.00 32.74 40.26 01126/2005 28.98 ·
24.044 1162~3 FRANKS. JAM ES & JORIT A 1 02.00 52.88 49.12 02103/2005 45436 ~
36.68.0142.1 FRAZEEt AN GI E 77.15 39.05 38~ 10 03/01/2005 40400 ~
22.51.3078~3 FREEMAN, NICOLE 28.58 27458 1.00 02/15f2005 94.16 M
24~ 04L 1708.2 FRErNW ALD t CLA Y J R 44.92 36.50 8.42 02/15/2005 90.00 -
23~ 014 0832.1 FRI ENDS OF CHI LDREN & F AMII 36. 71 35.71 1.00 03/01/2005 26.35 -
22~51 ~3660~3 FUH RMAN. J] M 27.45 21.18 6.27
36.69.0106.2 FURGASON. BONNIE 7 4~34 35429 39.05 02108/2005 35.29 ..
20.46.0262.2 GABRI ELt RON & MARILYN 69.48 34419 35.29 02101/2005 35.29 M
25.25.453042 GALITZ, KURT & JEANINE 44.38 42~a 1 1.57 02128/2005 4S.00 -
23402.4390.3 GALLUP r JOS HUA & EMrL Y 60.62 31 .64 28.98 01118/2005 17413~
22450~ 1996.2 GARCIA, CHRISSY 81 .38 44.88 36~ 50 01/26/2005 40~ 17 ..
20.46.0116.1 GARI BOVJCJ KAS I M 1 03~ 79 36497 35.29 31 .53 01/2612005 72.22 ~
22.50.0132.2 GARI DELt TROY 98.14 65~40 32.74 02/16/2005 73. 16 -
25.25.990442 GARVJNt MATTHEW 95.62 51 .54 44.08 02122/2005 91 .53 ...
23. 02~Og50.1 GA YTHIW AITE, RITCH I E & SUS~ 94~OO 47.43 46~57 01/18/2005 80.88 -
30~30.6220.2 GENTRY ~ LANCE 63.22 24.17 39405 01/2412005 39.05 ~
30. 7 4~3078.2 GENTSCH ~ NOREEN 212.45 a3~57 125~53 3.35 02116/2005 80.00 -
20.46.0622.1 GONZALES, JOHN 77.98 38.93 39.05 02109/2005 31 .53 ·
23.01.209041 GOSS EN. KELLI 68.14 35.40 32r74 01/18/2005 1 01.20 -
36469r0376~ 1 GRAYSON~GARY 92~66 46.57 46.09 02108/2005 69.00 -
37472.0212.1 GREEN, J USTI N 79.54 40426 39.28 02111/2005 45.00 -
~** jn Msg column jndicates no Notice is to be sent
/.~.... .
{
CITY OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List~ council Page: 5
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 1St 2005 02~57pm
Current Period; 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Barance Non..DeUnq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
32.3244 766~ 1 GREG HA TCHER CONSTRUCTI( 23.43 16~69 3.48 3.26
32.32.4650.1 GREG HATCHER CONSTRUCTIC 1 O~52 7.04 3.48 02115/2005 1.12M
22. 51.3350 ~ 1 GREGORY t STEVEN 59.64 30466 28498 01/14/2005 25~22 -
23. 03~40 12. 1 GREYLOCH CUSTOM CASrNETF 38.48 29.55 5.45 3.48
20.47.0056.2 GRI FFIN t STEPHEN & MARY J 0 69~ 12 36.38 32~ 74 01/26/2005 36.50 -
23.02.4290.1 GROSSOt SHADOW 5a~66 29.68 28.98 02115/2005 80.44 -
24.03.0034.1 GROUND ~ J EN NI FER 138.39 39405 76~57 22.77 01/19/2005 100.00 -
32.32.46B8~ 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY 13.64 8.48 3.48 1 ~68
46.17~O534.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY 13.05 9.57 3.48
32.32.4304~ 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME': 29476 20.95 5.44 3437
32.32.4342.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME': 14.73 9.57 3~48 1.68
32.32.4346.1 GUARANTEED QUALfTY HOME:: 20.00 20.00
32.32.4330 ~ 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOMEE 18.49 13.33 3~4B 1.68
32~32~4302.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 14. 73 9.57 3.48 1.68
37 .37.3300~ 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 11464 7.04 3.48 1.12
46L 17.0415.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME:: 53.46 17470 17. 70 14.58 3.48
22.50.2378.1 GUTHM I LLER~ BRIAN A 33.62 30466 2.96 01/18/2005 200.00 ...
24.04.1620.7 GUYMON, GREG & ALISON 31 .98 28.98 3.00 03/0212005 1 00.00 ..
30.7440074.1 HACKING. DALE 40~56 40.26 ~30 02122/2005 47.48 -
30.74.2760.2 HAGAN, CHRISTOPH ER & AMAf\ 123~ 14 76.57 : 46~ 57 02116/2005 854 78 ~
36.68.026842 HALEt LAWRENCE 75.66 41 .60 34 ~ 06 12/22/2004 45.38 -
22.50.1512.1 HALL1 LEO 92~88 39427 53.61 01/21/2005 49.85 -
23.02.3360.2 HALL1 TI MQTHY & DEBRA 70~ 1 0 33460 36.50 01/25/2005 72~84 -
37437.3310.1 HALLMARK HOMES 57441 21 .46 21.46 14.49 0111212005 6.17 ...
24.03~081 0.2 HAMM ER, MIKE 66482 31 .53 35.29 01/26/2005 27.77 -
35.35.303641 HARDlNG ~ MARY 33~ 76 25.22 8~54 02114/2005 5D~44 -
23r02.2612~2 HARMON t WI LLIAM 50.16 21 ~ 18 28.98 01/14/2005 25.22 -
36~69.0578.1 HARRIS~ DEBORAH 91.67 91.61 .06 02/16/2005 138.20 -.
37.37.3872.2 HARRIS ~ JOE & JI LL 39.15 39.05 .10 02128/2005 46~4 7 ..
2440440512~3 HARRIS. KATHY 85~62 42.81 42.81 02115/2005 113.66 ..
304 7 443230 ~ 1 HARRfSON~ THOMAS 62~86 22.60 40426 02122/2005 40.26 ~
30. 7443334~3 HASTI NG, SH ERRf 59.46 24.1 7 35 ~ 29 02111/2005 35~29 ..
22.50.2112.2 HAY. CHARLES & ROBERTA 141 ~55 52417 50.33 39.05 12/23/2004 1 01 ~56 ~
22.50.2372.5 HAYCOCK~ VANESSA 83.54 40~ 73 42.81 01121/2005 82.91 -
24.04.1212.1 HA YLETT ~ M rKE 66.82 31 .53 35.29 02115/2005 80.41 -
22.5140326.1 HAYMOND. DAVID A 92~66 44.88 47. 78 01/31/2005 44.02 -
36~6940694~2 HEATON. CHAD & HEATHER 144.79 84.09 604 70 02/16J2005 85.00 -
23.0245070.3 HEFNERt C & BEANt D~ 84.16 43.90 40426 02/09/2005 36.50 -
23.02~225045 HENEY1 TJMOTHY & JOANN B8.90 44488 44~O2 02101/2005 56.32 -
30. 7 4~2440.2 HERBERT ~ RAN DY & EM I L Y 35.87 31453 4.34 02125/2005 40 ~ 00 ~
25~O5.0220.1 HESS lNG, WfLLIAM 227.16 126474 100.42 01/19/2005 207.96 -
24.03LOO36.2 HESTER. CH RISTIN E 1 08418 57.85 50.33 02115/2005 50.33 -
24.03.0094.2 HESTER, CH RISTIN E A 149~54 84.17 65.37 0211 5/2005 42.81 ~
22.51.0934~2 HICKEYJ F~A~ & JEANE 71 ~90 42.92 28498 0210112005 Br56 -
22.51 .0658.1 HICKEY, JEAN 50.18 45.47 4.71 02114/2005 80 ~91 -
22450~ 0592~2 HIES. JOHNN 51.14 25.92 25422 02101/2005 69 ~94 -
22451.3580. 1 H IGGI NBOTHAM, RON 170.80 89.26 81.54 02116/2005 51 ~54 -
34.34.6264.1 HIGH~NDER HOMES 21 2. 71 138~O2 57.49 17420
24.03.026442 HJLLt TARA 80.52 40.26 40.26 01/12/2005 1 08.52 -
30.74.068843 HISLOP, TOM 57.96 25.22 32~74 02117/2005 25.22 -
29r07.099S43 HISLOP, TOM 7841 0 35~2g 42.81 0211 7/2005 46.57 -
29.07~ 1096.2 HISLOP. TOM & HA TCHERt PEN 91472 58 ~9B 32~ 74 02/1712005 66.46 -
22.50.4810.2 HIXj MICHAEL 44~ 16 32.74 11.42 02125/2005 40.00 -
35435.0221 .2 HOALST, JODI 139~44 54409 85.35 02128/2005 50.00 -
20.4640356r 1 HOLDRIDGEt JOANNE 1 04~92 53438 51.54 02128/2005 44.02 ..
wir. in Msg coJu mn indicates no Notice is to be sent
( ..........-..... .
1. :
CITY OF MERI DIAN Delinquent Account List.. cou ncil Page; 6
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:57pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No DerJnquent Minimum AmountDeJinquent Sa lance
Last Pmt Last Pm(
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
30.74.101443 HOLLOWAYt JERALD K 105.74 32~74 36r50 36.50 01/19/2005 80.52 -
32.32.4630.3 HOLZER, E RI C & LISA 420.26 42.81 377~45
22.51.0918.2 HOOD1CHAUNCEY 80440 404 14 40426 0211112005 6.54 -
22.51.0446~2 HOOTS. TRACI & RAMI REZ, MAf 579.01 340.39 236.91 1.71
22.50~ 0678 ~ 1 HOOVER, L YND M 165~B3 72.69 50.33 42~81 02116/2005 110449 -
22.50.068041 HOOVER. L YND M . 102.88 70. 14 32r 74 02116/2005 65432 -
36.68.0132.3 HOSTETLER~ J EANJNE 24~56 17.70 6~B6
36.69.1276.2 HOWARD. DONALD & CAROL YN 95468 95.68 04/21/2004 35.32 -
23~O 1 .0420.1 HOWARDt TREVIS 1 05.98 54 ~ 40 51 ~58 01/18/2005 1 02.02 ~
22.20.0084.1 HOWELL. P A TRICfA 37.63 30.66 6.97 01126/2005 22401 -
35~ 654 0704.2 HUBBARDt SCOTT & ERICA 61.10 44.02 1 7.08 02/25/2005 37.38 -
35.65~O706.1 HUDDLESTONt CODY 203.63 87.85 1154 78 02116/2005 60.00 -
35.65.0460.2 HUMPHREY. KELL Y 7841 0 42.81 .35429 01/25/2005 42.81 ..
30. 74~3436.2 HUMPHREYSt JASON & CHRIST 86~22 42420 44.02 02115/2005 64. 34 ~
22~51.0714.2 HUMPHREYS. JOHN 63.64 31464 32.00 01/26/2005 a2~OO -
22.51.0510.4 HUNT, WESLEY 84.16 43.90 40.26 02114/2005 44.02 -
36.6940926.2 HUNTTJ NG. 0 EN NIS & RANAE 1 ~344. 50 44.02 66.50 44402 1 , 1894 96 02101/2005 44.02 -
30~ 7442944.3 HUSFLOEN t TRr SHA 19.02 17.70 1432 03/01/2005 15~OO -
25~25.4024.2 HYMAS, AARON 61~72 28.98 32~ 74 01/28/2005 78.56 -
29.07.1 064.1 HYMAS. ARRON a 1.86 35~ 29 46.57 01/21/2005 145.62 ·
21.49.1148.1 IDAHO H EA TI NG AN D Al R 41 9.40 13g~80 139.80 139.80 01/13/2005 136.04 -
30~ 74~2856.2 IMMEGART, KURT 50~g6 23.19 27.77 01/27/2005 31 .53 -
24~03~4001 . 1 INTERSTATE BAlTERY 4~O6 4406 10f1912004 91 .68 -
20~4640220.2 IVERSON. DANl EL & JOYCE 68. 14 35.40 32.74 01/26/20Q5 32~ 74 ..
23~ 014 1902.3 IVERSON1 RODNEY 204.83 1 04.34 100449
22450.4506.1 JACOBSON t BETTY B. 4 7 ~ 38 25.92 21.46 01/18/2005 65438 -
23~ 23.30 12.2 JAEGER, KEVJN & CLA Y. TJ NA 107.48 39~ 16 36.50 31.82 01/07/2005 1 oo~oo ..
35.65~O666.2 JAMESON. BRETT 59.30 27.77 31.53 02101/2005 61 ~ 1 0 ~
25.25~OO24.1 JEFF MANS HI P 51 .78 24.01 27 ~ 77 01/1812005 7 4~B3 -
22.50~2096.1 JEFFS, GEORGE & PATTY 93.64 45.86 47~78 0211 5/2005 40.26 -
35.35.5028.3 JENS EN t ERIC & CH RI ST ALl NA 85.62 42.81 42.81 01/18/2005 94.94 -
32.32.4148.2 JESSEN. LELAND & GEN E 41453 31.53 1 o~oo 02115/2005 25~29 ~
25.25.107442 JOHNSONt BRETT & MiCHELLE 81486 39.05 42~81 01/18/2005 84.64 -
30.74.364242 JOHNSON t KEVI N 43+31 29407 14.24 02/14/2005 1 00.00 ..
23.01.2710~2 JOHNSONtMARC 111.38 41412 70.26 03/14/2005 36.50 ..
29.07.0886.3 JOHNSONt ROGER & HOLLY 51~78 24~O1 27 ~ 77 01/21/2005 65~68 -
20~47 .0068.2 JOHNSON ~ RONALD & APRI L 63.60 4 7 ~43 16~ 17 12107/2004 150.00 -
23.02.1 B90~3 JOHNSON, STEVE & BARB 141 ~80 53.15 54.09 34.56 11/09/2004 37.25 -
22.51.4290.1 JONES.BRET 231 .83 120~62 111.21 03/15/2005 1 05~70 -
36. 6B~0320.1 JONES1 DONALD 31485 31.53 ~32 0212212005 2B~OO -
20.47~ 1036.2 JON ES. F AROL 1 04416 68.93 35~23 02116/2005 125.00 -
22.50~2354.1 JONES. OWEN 72426 36.97 35~29 03/01/2005 26.26 -
23.02.5510.3 JON ES t SAMU EL 82~65 64.51 18~ 14
22.504209843 JONESt WES & CINDY 73.24 37495 35.29 02111/2005 32.74 -
22.50~2122.2 JONES. WES & CINDY 133.90 45486 55.30 32~ 74 01/18/2005 95r48 -
22~50~ 241842 JONES. WES & CINDY 99. 16 48.64 50.52 03/03/2005 60.00 -
24.03~O82842 JONES1 WESLEY & CYNTHIA 78.10 39.05 39.05 01/19/2005 139~79 -
23.01.2720.2 JOY. JENNIFER 80.40 40. 14 40.26 02128/2005 41 ~47 -
36.69.0568.1 JUDGE1 ROGER & SANDRA 84.28 40.26 44.02 02108/2005 40.26 ...
20.46.0802.4 JUDY t VI CTOR 157.38 89 ~46 67~92 02117/2005 50.00 M
37.37.3344.2 K W HOMES INC 35~40 29 ~ 70 5~70
32.32.4648.2 KA01 DAVJD & CHANG 19.41 17~70 1.71
36~6B.0224~ 1 KA VI LA. JOS EPH 74.34 35.29 39.05 01/14/2005 84.64 -
23~03~4020 .1 KB WELDING 22.48 9~51 12.97 02128/2005 3.48 -
35. 35~0391 .2 KEENEYtDARYL 85.62 42~81 42.81 01/21/2005 81486 w
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
('. . .{
CITY OF MERJ DrAN Delinquent Account List- cou ncU Page: 7
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15t 2005 02:58pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDerinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Derinq 01/20/2005 1 2/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
30~74.378B~2 KEEN EY ~ DOLAN & ELIZABETH 70~22 22.60 44.02 3.60 02128/2005 44402 -
23402.0952.3 KEITH t WI LLIAM & LORRAI N E 7 5~34 55.34 20 ~ 00 02125/2005 39.06 -
24.03.0286.1 KELL Y, MJLLrCENT 51.78 27 ~ 77 24.01 01/24/2005 27 ~ 77 -
24~O4.1944~2 KIMBROUGH~ CHRfSTOPHER & a5~ 62 39.05 46.57 01/12/2005 104.10 -
22.50.0594.2 KINDALL, AARON & M ISTrE 90.24 4 7 ~43 42.81 02117/2005 39.05 .-
23.0140160~ 1 KLUG. DAvro 41 ~39 37.36 4.03 01/18/2005 50.00 -
24+04.1204~2 KNIGHT, TIMOTHY 48.02 24.01 24.01 01/18/2005 20 ~ 25 ~
22. 51 ~3570~4 KNOXt JERRY & NORMA 605.96 76~ 16 77. 78 47.78 404424 07/1 9/2004 50.00 ...
46.46~6280.2 KNUFF t B RY AN & SHERRJ 66.82 31 .53 35429 01/24/2005 39 ~:05 ..
30.74.3962.2 KOCHt JOSEPH & VILMA 57.66 26 ~ 13 31.53 02115/2005 93~26 ~
24.04.185B~2 KOCH. MI CHAEL & SAL I NA a 1 ~86 35.29 46.57 02/09/2005 39.05 -
36~69.0498.1 KOELLING. CRAIG 70.58 35~29 35429 02101/2005 96.90 -
24.04.2304. 1 KOYLEt RUSSELL 85.62 39.05 46.57 01/2712005 46.57 -
37.37.311641 KUEHL CONSTRUCTJON 42.92 17 ~ 70 25.22 01/27/2005 ~ 17. 70 ~
20.46r0368.2 KUPER~ GREG 85.50 38~93 46.57 01/19/2005 79 ~08 ..
22.50~ 1750.1 LACY. MEL 122.25 29.45 65~ 29 27 ~51 01/1912005 1 OO~OO ~
29.07. 0260 .~1 LAMBSON. MARSHALL 120.72 41 ~60 79.12 01/19/2005 1 00.04 ~
22.50.426842 LANHAM. PATRICE 145.70 54.09 9' .61 01/1 9/2005 175.21 ~
23.01.0890.1 LANTZt STAN 56.11 30~66 25.22 .23 03/15/2005 25.00 M
23.02.4490~2 LARSON, L.EI F 65.88 59.10 6~78 03/14/2005 .' 50400 - ~
35.6540260.2 LARSON, WADE & LAURI 143.60 41 .60 56.64 45.36 01/19/2005 92.34 -
35.65.0300~ 1 LAU1 TODD 40~26 36.50 3~76 01/21/2005 36.50 -
35.35.0401.3 LA V ARELLOt M I G U EL & BRAND I 81.86 39~O5 42~ 81 02115/2005 82.84 -
35465.0626.2 LAWTONt ANN 41.83 39.05 2~78 01/26/2005 82.84 ~
22.50~ 0600.2 LAYTON. JONATHON & FELIClT 84.16 40 ~ 14 44.02 01/27/2005 32.74 -
46r46.6318.2 LEE~ PAUL HOJOONG 69~24 40.26 28.98 01/13/2005 78456 -
30.74.1260.3 LEGGETT. CHAD & CHERYL 94.59 35429 35.29 24L01 01/0512005 35442 M
22~50.2428.1 LEONARD, DAMON 1 OB~20 54.95 53.25 02125/2005 50.00 M
30.74.3250.2 LEVITI, MONTE & JULIE 74.10 23r58 50~52 11/23/2004 75.00 -
23.01.3250.2 LI DDELLt JOS H & SARA 136492 62.82 74.10 01 119/2005 181.08 ~
24.03.0386~2 LIGHTFOOT t LANCE S. 62~56 2B~98 32~ 74 ~84 02115/2005 65.00 -
30.74.3218.3 LI NOS EY. STEP HAN I E 67.96 25.15 42.81 01/26/2005 39. 05 ~
20~46.0328~2 LI NTONt CHAD 186. 72 32~23 154 ~ 49 03/01/2005 50.00 -W
37 ~ 7240292. 1 L1STON1 KEN 74434 35.29 39.05 01/24/2005 42~81 ·
23~O2.4070~4 LJ PROPERTIES LLC 65~21 31 ~31 15~O7 18r83 12/2112004 44.86 -
30.74.3624.3 LUTHY. BRITTENY 45.90 23.19 22. 71 03/09/2005 50.00 -
36~ 69. 1556.1 MAC E. JEFFREY & BERLEN E 228~55 50.33 178.22 03/11/2005 75.00 -
23~02.4480 r 1 MADRI D, JOS EPH F 77~OO 37.95 39~O5 01/24/2005 73.36 -
23.024141 O~ 1 MADSEN, JOHN 127.48 49.62 77.86 02104/2005 85438 -
23.01.3350~ 1 MADSEN~ LOU 54.20 25.22 28 ~ 98 0210212005 75.00 ..
35.35.1 004~2 MAHALISKOt MIKE 111 ~86 69.05 42.81 02116/2005 80.73 ..
304 74~O394.3 MANTHA~ TRAVIS & APRIL 61.72 28.98 32.74 02115/2005 28.98 ...
304 74.2642.1 MANWARINGt MARK 1 00495 39 r05 50~33 11.57 02115/2005 65~OO -
23402.151 O~ 1 MANWARlNGt MARK 138422 59 ~ 1 0 32~ 74 28.98 17.40 01/24/2005 10.00 -
20.46.0792. 1 MARCHALt BART 93464 49~62 44~ 02 02115/2005 81 .50 -
24.03.005642 MARCHANTt KIMBERLY 66.82 31.53 35429 01/21/2005 68~62 -
36.68.027642 MARCROFT1 BOB & ELAINE 361 .86 17 . 70 337.30 6~86
24. 03.0806~4 MARCUMt CARL & J ULI E 76.85 35.29 39.05 2.51 03/01/2005 40 ~ 00 -
23402~5940.1 MARl NEAUt SHI RLEY 93424 48~96 44.02 .26 01/11/2005 40.00 ~
24.0340396r2 MARKAR DESIGN 104.42 50.33 54~ 09 02128/2005 54.09 -
36.69~O156.3 MARQUIS~ RON & SANDRA 47.06 44402 3~O4 02125/2005 40498 -
29r07.0236.2 MARSHtROBERT 70.58 31 .53 39.05 02128/2005 35429 -
24.03.027443 MARTI N, BILL & DEANA 96.90 46.57 50.33 02114/2005 71.71 -
23.02.2520.3 MARTJN. CRArG 188499 111 rOB 71 .35 6~56 01/24/2005 1 00.00 ..
37~37.2892.1 MARTIN, RONNA 70~58 35~29 35.29 02108/2005 35.29 ~
t.. in Msg column jndicates no Notice is to be sent
(: ..
CITY OF M ERI DfAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: a
Standard Payment Customers Mar 1 5, 2005 02:58pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDeUnquent Ba'ance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Sa lance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12120/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35~64.0020.2 MARTINEZ, RON 61.72 28498 32~74 01/13/2005 156.06 -
30.744 1 044~3 MARTI NEZt ROSA 68.90 28.98 36450 3.42
22.50.242441 MARTS1 DEBJ 63~40 30.66 32.74 03/01/2005 28.98 -
37.37.3032.1 MARX1 BRAD & JANA 86.41 42~a 1 42.81 .79
22~50~3714.3 MATEESCU.ROXANA 96.27 33.21 31.53 31 .53 01/14/2005 70.09 -
36.68.0014~2 MATTOX~GARY 49.08 39405 10r03 01/04/2005 75.59 ~
36~69.0100.3 MAUPfN, BRADLEY 70.58 35.29 35 ~ 29 01/24/2005 32.55 -
22.5043888.1 MAXEYt STEFFANJE 81446 32~23 24.01 25.22 12/22/2004 27.02 -
30. 7 4.2902~4 MeSAl NE. DONALD 67.96 25.15 42.81 02/15/2005 119.38..
32.32.4606.1 MCCALLrSTER, GARY 76.55 17 . 70 21 .46 15421 22~ 18
36.69~O458.3 MCCREARYt EARL 93.19 42.81 50.38 01/18/2005 135.00 -
24~04.1 BBO~ 1 MCCUE1 DENNIS & RHONDA 85.62 42~81 42.81 02122/2005 39 ~05 ·
22.50L0400.3 MCFADDEN~ CLEORA 198~58 116.96 81462 01/21/2005 55.84 -
30. 7442566~ 1 MCFARLAND. SCOTT & NATALI E 85.62 39 ~O5 46.57 02104/2005 50.33 ~
37.37.5010.1 MCFATE, DAVID E~ 54.19 54.09 .10 03/07/2005 46.47 ~
20.47.1156.2 MCGOWNt MARK & TRAcr 37.36 36.38 498 0212212005 36.50 ~
22~51.3246.1 MCKAGUE. RICK 109.96 44r65 42.81 22.50 01/03/2005 1 00.00 ..
24.044 1798.2 MCKI NLEY t JAM ES A a3~31 27.77 27.77 27. 77 12/16/2004 139.76 ...
23. 02.4870~4 MCKtNLEY, JUNE 141.24 61488 59.06 20.30 02114/2005 50~OO -
23.02.6270.5 MCKINLEY, JUNE 82.85 38.93 43.92 02/1412005 50.00 ..
22.5042126.1 MCMAHANt BRIAN 136.68 56. 16 44.02 36.50 12/21/2004 67.64 -
23.02.3892.1 MCNALLEYt RUSSELL 117.15 35~29 42.81 39 ~ 05 12/29/2004 121 .90 -
36~36.1 014.2 MCQUEEN, ALLEN 11 3r 70 20.25 24401 27.77 41.67 11/29/2004 44.61 ..
23~02.5590~ 1 MEDENA~ RAYMOND 64.95 35r 1 7 29. 78 02115/2005 30rOO ..
36.6940062.2 MEEKERt LARRY 115~ 70 54 ~ 09 61.61 01/27/2005 57.85 -
23.01.273041 MELLEN. ANGELA 156. 13 64.59 91 ~54 02116/2005 81.00 -
23402r6240.2 MENCHACA, ERNI E 86.94 50.60 36.34 01/13/2005 108.96 -
24.04~2052.2 MENDENHALL~ ALAN 50466 50.33 ~33 03/14/2005 50400 ~
22.51 ~4362.1 MERIDIAN MARKET PLACE 322.06 306.27 154 79 12/14/2004 574.94 -
20.46.0198.3 MESERTHtANDY 94~OO 47.43 46.57 02107/2005 ..78~92 ...
46.464 71 05.1 MES$I NA VI LLAG E .. WATER FE, 11 ~86 8.38 3.48 03/01/2005 6~42 -
22.5043848. 1 MEYERS~DAN 100.90 51.19 49.71 01/25/2005 90.00 ~
30~ 7 4.0052~ 1 M I LLER~ E. ROGER 30.32 25.22 5~ 10 03/1 0/2005 23~8B -
24.03.01 02.1 MI LLER, KENT & J ENNI FER 89.38 46.57 42~81 01/18/2005 61.23 ...
22~50.2352r2 MILLERt SARAH 86.94 46.68 40426 02116/2005 88.42 ..
20.46.0406~ 1 MILLS, TI MOTHY 37.43 35~40 2403 03/15/2005 37.43 ...
24r04.0538~ 1 MONSONt THOMAS 49.92 49.12 .80 02116/2005 150~OO -
22.50.3856.2 MONTGOMERY. JOSEPH & OOF 182.61 89.27 91 .69 1.65 02101/2005 1 05.00 -
33.33.0002.1 MONTVUE PARK 41 ~42 18.83 22~59 01/26/2005 26.35 -
33.334 0001 ~ 1 MONTVUE SPINAL elr N I C 19.55 3.48 3.48 3.48 9~ 11
22~51.4214~2 MOORE~ LAWRENCE & KRISTIN 175~59 44.02 47.78 55.30 28.49
24~ 04.1634.1 MOOREt RUSSELL C 275.56 17 ~ 70 21 .46 21 .46 214r94 08/0312004 1 OO~OO -
22~50.1202.1 MOORE, TERRY A. 88.44 45.55 42.89 01/18/2005 42.89 -
23.01419BO~3 MOORTGA T t JAMES & J ENNI FE~ 143.03 131 ~96 11 ~ 07
35.35~ 0205.2 MORANt GLENN 74.34 35.29 3g~05 01/25/2005 35.29 -
37 .37 .2894~ 1 MORGAN CREEK HOMES 13.56 10.08 3.48
37.37.3610.1 MORGAN CREEK HOMES 13~56 1 0 . 08 3.48
24~03.08B9.1 MORNJNG GLORY #2 HOA 31.32 31432
22.51 ~3112.6 MORRIS. AMB ER 62.96 32.32 30.64 02/25/2005 30 ~ 64 -
30~ 74.0022.1 MORTON~ MERRILEE PARK 936.79 412.50 408.74 115~55 03/15/2005 129~OO -
20.46.0450.3 MOSKOWITZ, ALAN & HELENE 65.72 36438 29~34 01/26/2005 54.60 -
23.02~605043 MOWLER~ JAKE 44.64 40~ 14 4~50 03/07/2005 32.00 -
30.74.3216.1 MUr R~ GRANT 63~53 24.17 39.36 02116/2005 25400 -
25.0540B16~ 1 NAVA~8ENNY 63.06 27.77 35.29 01/14/2005 71.40 -
35.65.0450.1 NELSON, MARILYN 87~96 28.98 58.98 01/1 9/2005 130~92 ..
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
C J.:
t
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Accoun t List- council Page: 9
Standard Payment Customers Mar 151 2005 02:59pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minjmum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Gust No Name Barance NonMDelinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35164~OO54.2 N ELSON, ROLAN D & IDA 37419 36~50 .69 02122/2005 28.29 -
23.02.1990~ 1 NEWBERRYt RrCHARD 81.38 44.88 36.50 01/07/2005 118r98 -
24.03.0660.1 NEWHOUSE~ RAYMOND & TINA 92.33 35.29 46.57 1 044 7 01/25/2005 75~ 00 ~
25425.4310.2 N I CHOLS~ MICHAEL 33~ 75 24401 9.74 02122/2005 50.00 -
22451.033443 NJEHOFF, DENNIS 90.88 39. 16 51.72 02123/2005 60.00 -
37.37.4214.2 NIELSEN, CLARK 54.22 46.57 7.65 12/27/2004 139~58 -
25.25.9976.2 N I HAD 8 ERRERI STANN 35.40 17.70 17. 70 01/26/2005 17 . 70 ..
22~504 2238.2 NOSALSKIY1 RUSLAN 166.92 56~32 62.82 47.78 01/18/2005 69.60 ...
24.04.21 a6~3 NYE~ KEVrN & ROXENNA 99.32 47.78 51 .54 02/22/2005 47478 -
25.25.0074.1 OLIVER CLEAVER 50.44 25422 25422 01/13/2005 5.32 -
25425.0086.1 OLIVER CLEAVER 126.49 42.81 5B~ 98 24.70 01/19/2005 100.00 ·
36~6840234~2 OLIVOTTJ, MI KE & JACOB I 47.99 42.81 5.18 02107/2005 55400 M
25~25.1 058.2 O.N EI LLt KA THLEEN 143.80 17 ~ 70 32.74 25422 68. 14 11/23/2004 113.24 -
24.03.0826.2 OITOOLEt RHONDA 73.00 32~ 74 40426 02/01/2005 32~ 74 -
22.5143430.2 OVERTON. DAVID 54.36 54.36 07/0212004 56~31 -
24.0340044.2 PADGETT, DAVE & CHARLENE 87.23 46~57 40.66 02123/2005 60.00 ..
22.50.1770.2 PALMERt ELDON 374.10 149.00 123483 101427 01/18/2005 126.93 -
22.50.3732.2 PANGBURNtDAN 38.23 32~23 6~OO 02122/2005 21 . 77 ..
30. 74~2682.4 PASSANNANTE~DAN 240.03 52.88 75.44 1 05.52 6.19
30~30.6070.2 PASSANNANTE, DAN & ATHEN~ 80.52 40.26 40.26 01/26/2005 40.26 -
30.30.6204.2 PASSANNANTE, DAN & L YNCH~ 86.25 23. 19 31.53 31 .53 01/18/2005 40 +69 -
20.46.0590.1 PECHT. BRYAN 64474 36~ 97 27. 77 02111/2005 80~52 ..
35.65.0346.3 PEDERSEN1 DOUGLAS & KATHF 37 ~50 36.50 1.00 02/22/2005 72.00 ..
37~ 72.0110.2 PENNINGTONt JAMES 69.24 36~50 32.74 01/21/2005 28~9B -
36~69.0452.2 P ERC] FI ELD t TI MOTHY & MI STY 78.10 35.29 42481 02125/2005 42.81 -
24.03.0066~5 PERRY. DOUGLAS & BARBARA 1 02.34 47478 54.56 02116/2005 41400 ..
23.02.0960.1 PETE RSON. JOHN 89.88 45.86 44.02 02111/2005 32.74 -
30.74.3518.3 PETTIGREW, JOSHUA 39r 16 1 7.70 21 .46 02115/2005 52.04 -
20.46.0874~ 1 P ETTINGJ LLt C. BLAI NE 87.82 42.46 45~36 02114/2005 45 r 36 ·
36.69.0478.1 PHAKDY t SAM 1 00.66 46.57 54 ~ 09 02/28/2005 46.57 ..
23~O2.3732.4 PHAM~ KI MAN 65~4a 36.50 28.98 01/1 8/2005 125.04 -
23.01.3130.2 PH I LrpSt ROY 74.62 46~57 28.25 03/1 0/2005 100.00 -
36.6941008.1 PHILL1PSt ROY 59.30 31 .53 27. 77 01/1 8/2005 76~ 14 -
30. 74.3560~2 PICARD ~ VI NCENT 77413 22.80 22.80 31 .53 12/1 0/2004 66.78 -
22~51.4000.3 PION EER FI NANCEt LLC 304~ 14 34.31 33~61 41413 1 g5~ 09 09/21 J2004 50.53 ..
37 ~37.2912.2 PI STERZI, JOSEPH & MAUREEN 50.44 17.70 32~74 01/18/2005 28.98 ...
24~O4.1412.1 PLUMLEY, RODNEY & M~ NAOM 81 ~86 39.05 42~ B 1 01/18/2005 a4~64 ~
23~01 ~ 1020.2 PONJ EVIC, S ENADA 128.66 21 .18 17.70 21 ~46 68.32
23.02.184042 PORTENI ERt ROBERT & RACHE 132.80 37 ~20 4 7 . 78 47.82 01/14/2005 90.00 -
24.03.0332.1 PORTERt DA VI 0 69.24 25.22 44.02 01/18/2005 79~38 ...
36~69.0522.1 PORTER~ DOUGLAS 84.28 40.26 44.02 01/13/2005 74.1 0 ~
36.69.1282.1 PORTER, JOHN 70.34 66.58 3~76 03/01/2005 74~10..
22~51.0774.4 PREECE,ROBERT 43.32 12r01 31.31 0210212005 22.99 ~
35.354 0081 ~3 PRELL WJTZt BARBARA 91472 58.98 32.74 02116/2005 62.70 -
23.02~O418~2 PRICE. DOUGLAS 89~ 18 74.14 15~O4 03/15J2005 51 .54 -
35.65~061 0.2 PRIMEAUXt MARK & KATRrNA g3~ 14 39.05 54.09 01/12/2005 240~ 19 -
23~O2~5340.2 PRIV A TSKY t K. & JOHNSTON, TI 132.88 1 07 ~86 25402 0212212005 21 0.00 -
23.01.0100.2 PYLJCANt WOODROW A~ 131.29 131 r29 0211 8/2003 45.26 ~
31452. 0302~ 1 R T NAHAS FURNITURE STORE 267.01 48.35 33.31 37.07 148~ 28 08/26/2004 96~ 70 -
36.69. 1652.1 R W BUDGE LLC 88.04 44402 44.02 01/18/2005 51.54 M
24.04.183843 RADIGAN, DONALD & CYNTHIA 69.50 36.50 33.00 03/14/2005 40400 -
23.02.1570.2 RAMSAY. JUANITA 71 .90 39. 16 32.74 01/31/2005 28~ 74 -
24.04.2074.1 RAMZAt RONALD 47.52 40 ~26 7426 03/14/2005 32.74 -
30~ 7 4. 3562~4 RANDOMt DUANE & MICHELLE 68494 26.13 42.81 02/0812005 42.81 -
30.7443420.3 RANSOM, PATRICIA 72~3a 25.54 46.84 02116/2005 60.00 ~
**. in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(". ~::-':""...... .
f
\ .
CITY OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List~ council Page; 10
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:59pm
Current Period; 03/20/2005 . .
No Delinquent Minimu m AmountDelinquent Sa lance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Barance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12120/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
23401. 1 050~2 RED CANYON CORPORATION 83~ 45 26~90 25.22 17 ~ 70 13.63
23.02.2580.1 REED. DEBORAH 66.1 a 33.44 32.74 01/1 0/2005 57496 -
22.50.2390.2 REED~ LORETTA 152.98 77.08 75~ 90 02116/2005 70.00 -
30~ 74.0392.2 REES. ARTHUR 69. 14 25.22 25.22 18.70 02111/2005 75.00 -
3743742954~2 REPACJt RANDALL & LYNETTE 93.14 42.81 50.33 01/24/2005 53.89 ..
24.04.0542~2 RES, SHAWN 50.44 21 .46 28.98 01/19/2005 92.50 - .
35.35.1230.5 RESCH. BRIAN & JAN ETTE 66.82 31 .53 35.29 01/24/2005 73.36 ,-
36r69~0488.1 REYNOLOSt SAMUEL 69~23 69.13 .10 02125/2005 72.79 M
25.25.9896. 1 RICE~ ALLEN & TERESA 61. 72 28.98 32.74 03/1 0/2005 32. 74 ~
37~37~3118.2 RICEt JAM ES & LIZETTE 309~32 309432 06130/2004 123426 ~
25.05.045442 RILEYt R SHANE 80.52 40.26 40.26 01/1 8/2005 68.26 M
37.75.0110.1 ROARING SPRINGS 6.96 3~4a 3~48 02101/2005 189.28 -
37 ~ 75.0 112r 1 ROARING SPR1NGS WATER PAf 37 ~66 15.07 22.59 02101/2005 11.31 ..
22. 50~0258.4 ROBSJ NS~ ELLEN 69~12 36.38 32.74 01/27/2005 36. 50 ~
22. 50~ 0256.2 ROBBI NSt ELLEN a8~90 44~a8 44r02 01/27/2005 40.26 -
30. 7 4.2896~5 ROBERTS, DJ LLON 19.25 18.68 .57
25.25.1 02443 RODAMER, LI NDA 47.50 28.98 18~ 52 01/2612005 58~24 -
30.74.0406.4 RODGERS, ANGIE 133~ 16 28~98 1 04. 18 01/13/2005 154.46 ...
22~51.3214~2 ROE HR. ell NT 28. 75 26.90 1.85 02114/2005 75400 -
22.51.0B66r 1 ROHRBACH. CHERYL 70.36 40.14 30.22 03/08/2005 40.00 -
35435.0105.2 ROONEYt BRUCE & PAIGE 96.06 40.26 55.30 .50 01/24/2005 95.00 ..
22~50~0130~ 1 ROSARIOt SONY A 84.42 40. 14 44.02 .26 02122/2005 40.00 -
23~02.471 0.1 ROSEtDEANNA 120.94 54.36 66~ 58 02108/2005 51 .58 -
36.69.0544.2 ROSS. PATRICIA 85.62 39 ~05 46.57 01/25/2005 39.05 -r
31 .52.0269.2 ROUND TABLE PJZZA 454~92 454.92 03/1 0/2004 13~40 ..
35.35.0058.2 ROWETT, BOB & DANA 85.62 39.05 46~57 01/14/2005 84.71 -
20.47.0074.2 RUMSEY, PHILIP & JENNJFER 91442 49462 41 .80 03/07/2005 50.00 ..
32~32.4020 .2 RUTHS,GARY 73~OO 32.74 40.26 01/27/2005 40.26 WL
23402~31 ao~ 1 RYANt WALTER 114.55 74.88 39~ 67 02116/2005 100.00 -
31.57.0017.1 S & P SURVEYHOMEt LLC 356r82 68~66 68.66 68466 150.84
22.50.00gQ~ 1 SABAt VI RGI NA 167.08 79.23 87.85 02116/2005 84.09 -
22. 51 ~3206 ~5 SALt NASt MARIO & OLGA 25~83 24~ 12 1.71
23.01.1200.2 SCH I MPH, FRED 141.88 75.28 66r58 .02 02128/2005 60rOO -
22.51.3720.2 SCHOW~ BART & ALlSSA 44.17 37.20 6.97 01/26/2005 252.00 -
46446~ 7060~ 1 SCHROEDER ENT 35.40 17.70 17~ 70 01/25/2005 68~52 -
37437.5056.1 SCHROEDER ENT 39.16 21 .46 17~ 70 01/25/2005 83.25 -
24.03.0042.1 SCHWENDt LUVMINDA 49.50 32~74 16.76 02/15/2005 40.00 -
29.07.0984.1 SCOTT. JASON 48. 1 7 27.77 20.40 01/18/2005 1 00.00 -
30r74.28BO.1 SEARCY t ALFREDO 88.72 27 ~ 11 61.61 01/26/2005 54.09 -
30.74.2718.2 SELLS. DAVID 1 04~34 61 ~53 42~a 1 02117/2005 80.B8 -
23.01 .3342~4 S EMCHI SHI N1 ALEX 56.46 22~ 59 33.87 01/26/2005 33.87 -
34.34.6334.2 S EMM ELROTH, A~ & JENKINS. 0 24.58 24.01 .57
35.35.2392.2 SEMMER, CHAD & MARY 61.72 32.74 28.98 01/19/2005 79 ~ 54 -
35.64~2028.2 SEXTON~ MARY 120.91 31 .53 46~57 42.81 01/18/2005 80.33 -
30.74.2632.5 SHANNON t CHRISTI NE 35.40 17.70 17.70
30.30.6240~2 SHAW. KELLY 113.72 55~ 15 58.57 02/16/2005 120.09 -
30.74.337043 SHAY. PAUL & JOYCE 55~O6 19 ~66 17. 70 17.70 12/23/2004 37.16 -
30.74.3570.3 SHAY~ PAUL & JOYCE 56.86 17.70 1 7 . 70 21 .46 12/23/2004 38r 14 ...
36.65.30g2~ 7 SHELLEY t RALPH & DIXI E 94.46 44402 32~ 74 17.70 12/21/2004 38.36 -
22.50.3780.2 SHELLEY. DIXI E & R. KENT 76402 404 73 35.29 01/31/2005 51435 -
30~ 74.3242.1 SHEL TRONt ROGER 78478 29466 49.12 01/2 4J 2005 49412 -
22~50.1902.2 SHEL TROWN. ROGER & BONNII 69.80 60466 9414 02116/2005 a3~96 R
30~ 74.3960.1 SHERARD. BILL 65.77 25.15 40.62 02115/2005 45.00 ..
24.04~ 161 8.3 SHJMEL. RYAN & SARAH 54.46 54.09 .37 02125/2005 65.00 ~
244 04~ 187B~3 SHI RLEY. GARRY 78~ 1 0 35~29 42.81 02115/2005 39 r 05 -
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
CITY OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List- cou ncil Page: 11
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:59pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Min imum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12120/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22451 ~O930~2 SHOBE. MONTY & CAROL 68.14 35.40 32.74 01/19/2005 61 .72 -
22~50.0292.1 SHOEMAKER~ TAM! 52.7 a 38.1 0 14.68 09/14/2004 1 00.00 -
25.09.005841 SHUR-LUGK HOMES 91 r 16 1 7.70 17470 17.70 38406
25.09.0006.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 68.92 17.70 17470 17.70 15~82
25.09.0002.1 SHUR..LUCK HOMES 68.92 17~70 17. 70 17 ~ 70 15.82
244 03.0292~ 1 SHURTZt ROD 134~37 57.85 76.52 02116/2005 1 25.00 -
304 7443096.1 SrGMOND, SERGIO 107.44 57.11 50~33 0211612005 163.05 ...
22.50.192045 SILVEY, BRYAN 76~02 ~ 36.97 39.05 01/27/2005 6g~60 ..
36.69.114041 S I MMONSt JA Y 62.1 6 61.61 .55 03/07/2005 61 .06 -
23rO 1.2250~2 Sl MON, BRADY 85~82 39.16 46~ 66 03/14/2005 50.00 -
30~ 74~2506.3 SIMPSONt KENNETH & AMY 126.60 79~ 12 47.48 02116/2005 120~OO -
24~ 04. 1302.1 SIMS, ELLEN 45.11 25.22 19.89 0210812005 26~ 79 ..
22~51 ~4034. 1 SKlNN ER. KEN 42r64 21.1 a 21.46 01/31/2005 69~ 16 -
23.02~3962.4 SLENDER, LEONARD & BOSWEI 46r68 21.46 25422 01/26/2005 29.92 -
30.74.1 05842 SL YTER~ GORDON 76. 76 36.50 40426 02/14/2005 90.82 -
30.74.111842 SL YTER, GORDON 133.58 47.78 47478 38.02 03/07/2005 50.00 -
30.74.1050.1 8M 1THt CARSON 35~ 40 17.70 17 . 70 01/1 0/2005 46~52 -
35~35.1210.3 SMITH. GREGORY J 69~24 28.98 40.26 01/28/2005 78.56 -
22.51 .0498r2 SMITHt KARL 312.70 308.13 4r57
20.46.0380.4 SMITHt KYLE 11 0.70 50.44 60.26 .: 02109/2005 60~ 74 -
23402.1700.2 SMITH. LEON & JANICE 1 05.90 54.36 51 ~54 01/24/2005 44~02 -
22450~OO12.1 SMITH. PAUL H. 84. 16 40. 14 44.02 02/09/2005 32.80 ...
22.51.3090~3 SOL TAUt CYRIL 97.94 48.50 49~44 02115/2005 45r68 -
32.32.482243 SOMAZZI. ROGER & JENNJ FER 79. 71 42.81 36~90 03/09/2005 60.00 -
24.03.0836.3 SOSA. JOSEPH 46.50 36.50 10.00 03/0112005 44~02 ~
23.02r0900.2 SOUZA. JR., WI LLJAM 124~62 46~84 77.78 01/25/2005 122474 ...
32~32.4370.2 STADTLER, CHARLIE & LAURA 39.50 21.46 18.04
23.02.1 830.2 STANSELLt KATHY 56.56 34.19 22.37 02/22/2005 40.00 -
304 30. 6334~2 STEELE~ STEVEN & 0 EBB] E 121.75 28.09 46.57 46.57 452 01/19/2005 124.00 -
30430~6268~ 1 STETSON HOMES 40.50 20.25 20425 03/01/2005 20.25 -
22451 ~2801 ~ 1 STEVEN HILL 35.40 17.70 17470 01/26/2005 14.95 -
30.7 4.34 70~3 STOCJ<TON, JASON & J ENNJ FEF 75.86 20.64 55.22 01/21/2005 81~72 -
30. 7 4.2994~2 STOKESBERRY, COREY 81 .82 36.33 45.49 02122/2005 45r49 -
22.50.44 a 2.3 STONE. HAROLD 75~66 39 ~ 16 36~50 01/19/2005 1 05.26 -
22~51.0938.5 STRATE1 EUGENE 64~ 12 42420 21 .92 02108/2005 59.82 -
23.01.1170.2 STRATE1 EUGENE & CARYN 55.39 50~a2 4.57
22.50.4578.2 STRATE1 EUGENE & CARYN 25.75 21.1 a 4.57
23.23.0002.1 STUBBLEFIELD DEVELOPMENT 386.09 336~O9 50.00 03/14/2005 25.00 ..
45.20.0B04r2 SULLIV AN t MI CHAEL & OTI LLQ 24.32 21 .46 2~86
23.02~ 1670~ 1 SWENSON. MILDRED 11 2.30 34.24 28480 28.80 20446 11/24/2004 23.40 -
23.02.1730~2 T & T INC 208.68 117.46 91.22 02/25/2005 98.74 -
36.69.04B4~6 TADEVIC, TOM 244.99 61.61 87.93 95~45 01/21/2005 66~35 -
33.40.0002~ 1 TBID-M081-SLtLLC 407.58 284. 1 0 49.98 73.50 02128/2005 49~98 -
20447.0052.4 TENNANT. ROBERT & CONNIE 117.18 54.36 62~82 02103/2005 115.86 ~
23402.1190~ 1 TERRELL, A 143.95 32.62 111.33 02122/2005 35.00 ~
22450~ 1476.1 THE DEN 225~4B 80.64 76.18 68.66 1211 6/2004 7.55 ..
29.57~01 04.1 THE PERFECT CUP 37469 11.31 15.07 11.31 02109/2005 30. 14 ..
22~50.1860.1 THE PODIATRY SLOG 52~ 16 26~O8 26.08 01/26/2005 26.08 ..
20.43.4210.1 THE RAM 251.68 160~96 90. 72 01/18/2005 8.38 ~
23.02~25504 7 THOMAS1 DREW 11 0.04 21.46 25.22 25.22 38~ 14 12/15/2004 35~ 15 -
36.6g.072B~ 1 THOMAS1 POLZIN 60.42 36.50 23~ 92 01/04/2005 88.36 -
22.51.117243 THOMAS/ANDERSON PARTNER 1 8.86 7.55 11.31 01/14/2005 35.54 -
22.50.035041 THOMASSON, DAVID C 78.48 52.40 26.08 01/1 8/2005 55~OO -
23L02.4030.1 THOMSON, LEROY 83r 1 8 17 ~ 70 32474 32~ 74 12/22/2004 50.40 -
25.09.0052.1 THORNTON. DON 97.34 17.70 1 7 . 70 17.70 44.24
.... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CJTY OF M ERI DJAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 1St 2005 03:00pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minjmum AmountDelinquent Ba1ance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Sa lance No n...D e J i nq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35435.5026.2 THORNTON t NIKKI 30.00 30400 02125/2005 32.74 -
4644646246.2 THRONEBERRY, BRJAN & KATH 93414 42.81 50.33 03/01/2005 46 ~ 1 6 ...
23.02.2200.3 TODDt RICK 94.34 32.62 32.74 28~98 01/28/2005 31 r 76 -
35.35.0423.2 TOMASZEWSKI~ HELENE 80.52 36.50 44~ 02 02115/2005 36450 -
35.35.307844 TOMLINSON, JOSHUA 93~oa 32~ 74 44~O2 16~32
36.69.0314~2 TOTMAN, JERRY 54.20 25.22 28.98 02101/2005 25.22 ..
33~33.9114.1 TOUCHMARK 48.02 24.01 20.25 3.76 03/01/2005 20.25 -
3343349112~ 1 TOUCHMARK 44~26 24.01 20.25 03/01/2005 20.25 -
33.33.911 O~ 1 TOUCHMARK 44.26 24.01 20.25 03/01/2005 20.25 -
33.33.9056~ 1 TOUCHMARK CONSTRUCTION 55.54 27477 27.77 03/01/2005 31 .53 M
33. 33.9020~ 1 TOUCHMARK CONSTRUCTION 63.06 31.53 31.53 03/01/2005 35.29 -
37. 37 ~395B~3 TRAIL1 CHARLES 28.04 21 ~46 6.58 12/23/2004 79.22 -
22.50.3812.1 TREGELLAS, MARK 111.62 56~32 55~30 02115/2005 8541 0 -
24404.0918.4 TUCKETT. QUETON & COLLEEN 53438 32.74 20r64 01/04/2005 71 ~ 08 -
30.7442386.2 TUPPERt PAXTON & APRIL 175486 87.93 87.93 02122/2005 ) 123.38 ..
22~5043824~ 1 TURNBOUGH, JAKE & WENDY 69~94 33.44 36 ~ 50 02108/2005 . 28.98 ..
22.50~4522.1 UGARRIZAt SHELBY 69~4a 34. 1 9 35.29 02110/2005 24~O 1 -
22~50.00a8. 7 ULM ERt JEFFREY 56.58 21 .18 17.70 17 ~ 70 01/0712005 37.16 ~
23.01.086043 VAN BRAGT, WILLY 59~ 18 42~ 1 0 17.08 02109/2005 40.00 M
25~25.1 08842 VANDEVENTER~DARREL 73.00 40.26 32~ 74 01/24/2005 w 30~10 ...
24.04.198044 VENAGLIAt JOHN 78.1 0 39.05 39.05 01/1 8/2005 50.33 -
24. 03.0030~2 VERHEIJ EN. ERI C & CHRI STI E 54.01 24.01 30.00 0211 0/2005 35.29 -
22.50.0136.3 VICTORY, CHRIS 1 03492 83.67 20.25 01/14/2005 82.88 -
23.02.1860.3 VlCTORY1 CHRISTOPHER 92451 29.45 27~ 77 35.29 01/26/2005 107~50 -
22~50.45B6~2 VICTORYt MJCHAEL & YUNSUK 47.74 24.94 22.80 01/24/2005 80.00 -
23.02~4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY 101 r 16 57.14 44~O2 0212812005 43418 ..
22.51.3094.2 VN UKJ JOHN 60~82 33.30 26.88 .64 02101/2005 50400 ...
23.02. 1430.4 WADDOUPS~DOROTHY 65.04 25.92 25.22 13~90 01/19/2005 60.00 ~
23.01.2310.2 WALKER, BETTE 131.11 61.65 61 ~61 7.85 03/15/2005 40.00 -
20.46.0a60~2 WALMERt TAMMY JO 41.67 38.93 2~74 .: 03107/2005 40 ~OO ..
23. 0 1.3340~ 1 WALSHt RON 136452 136.52
30.74.2540.2 W AL THALLt TRAVIS & TI NA 44~29 35~29 9.00 02128/2005 30.05 ..
23.01.0460.3 WARDLE~ JOHN & CHERYL 173~50 1 03. 12 70r38 01/11/2005 80478 ..
20446.0540.3 WARNER. DENNIS & NICOLE 75.66 39. 16 36.50 01/27 J2005 32. 74 ~
21 .48.2651 .1 WATER WORKS CAR WASH INC 3.48 3.48 12/14/2004 63.26 ~
2245143198.3 WEAST, WESLEY 126.12 57 ~96 68.16 02115/2005 65.00 -
22~514331 0.2 WEBB ~ MI CHAEL 89.00 43~88 45.12 02115/2005 50.00 -
23.02.1350.2 WE8ER~ JOHN J 63~40 34.42 28~98 01/18/2005 72.64 -
24.0442298.1 WEIGHT, RICHARD 54.20 25.22 28.98 02108/2005 25r22 -
36.694 1658r 1 WEIGLE, THOMAS & ANNETTE 132.06 40.26 44r02 47.78 12/28/2004 44~02 -r
23.0245580.1 WELBORN. KENNETH 89.26 46.45 42rB 1 01/19/2005 77 ~ 12 -
23.0143300.2 WELCH, LEE 112.67 112.07 .60 03/14/2005 157 ~ 19 -
22~51.3770. 2 WERNER, DALE & SUSAN 64~65 60.08 4.57
23.01.1110.2 WEST, JONI 72.88 40 ~ 14 32.74 02117/2005 55~ 18 -
22.50.2434.2 WESTENHAVERtNANETTE 42.43 40. 14 2.29
36.36.1 082~ 1 WESTMINSTER HOMES 34473 26.35 8.38 01/25/2005 6.42 -
22.50.23a4~4 WHITE. SHAl NE 69412 40. 14 28 ~ 98 01/14/2005 56.38 -
30.74.3204.1 WHITE. TAWNYA 49.98 22.21 27.77 02107/2005 55.54 -
30~ 74.0064.2 WHITS ITT J JOS EPH 100.58 66.58 34.00 02114/2005 1 OO~OO -
35.35.0097 . 2 WHITTED, NEIL & CHRISTINE 76.76 44.02 32474 02111/2005 75.78 -
30.74.370843 WILBURN, STEVEN 97.82 55.15 42~67 02/16/2005 110.00 -
22~51.423041 WILLIAMS, ELIZABETH 54~20 25.22 28.98 01/12/2005 28.98 -
22.20.0090.2 WILLIAMSt MARY 63.56 45486 1 7 ~ 70 02/08/2005 37452 -
46.46.7094.2 WI LLIAMS t SHAMS RI C & DON Nt 43.81 42481 1rOO 03/01/2005 45457 -
23.23.3988.2 WI LSON, CLINTON 1 02.50 52.1 7 50.33 02108/2005 42~81 w
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( . r.. .
:.... .
CtTY OF MERIDIAN Delinq uent Account List- councir Page: 13
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15t 2005 03:00pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimu m AmauntDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pml
Cust No Name Balance Non~DeJinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
30.74.0356.1 WILSON~ DEANA 119.46 50~33 694 13 0211 0/2005 61 ~61 -
25.05~0416.2 WILSON~ DON & JAN 81 .86 35429 46.57 01/1 BJ2005 93.37 -
25~ 25. 9984.2 WILSONt JOE & AMY 36.76 36450 .26 03/15/2005 40~OO ..
23~O242714.4 WI LSON I RICHARD 54 ~ 90 29.68 25.22 01/26/2005 25.22 -
24.04.1584.1 WIND, JOHN 91.80 40.26 51 .54 01/1 8/2005 93.60 -
29L07.0aaO.2 WI NKLERt GREG 68.58 32.74 35484 02115/2005. 65.00 -
22.50.2302.1 WINTERTON t DARJ N 76~64 36.38 40.26 01/19/2005 584 78 M
30~ 7 4~OO94.4 WINWOOD, RANDY & CATHLEE~ 170.66 101 .62 69.04 03/1 0/2005 20.00 ..
20~47& 1204.2 WIXSON, RYAN 90.55 57.73 32.82 03/07/2005 55.00 - .
22~50~2426.1 WYATT~ SAMUAL 135.98 54.36 81 ~62 01/31/2005 45~ 72 -
24.03~O412.4 WYMAN, DUSTlNE 130474 87.93 42.81 03/01/2005 46~57 -
30.74.033841 YEAGER, ROD ERI CK 54 33.06 27 .77 5~29 03/08/2005 30 ~ 00 -
30.74.037243 YELTON~ LAURA 11 0.52 32.74 77.78 01/1 9/2005 a6~ 90 -
23r02.068041 YOUNGt AUSTIN L 81.42 36495 44.47 02104/2005 75.70 -
23~02.0650.2 YOUNG. AUSTrN L 71 .46 70.71 .75 03/14/2005 55.00 -
23.02~O670.1 YOUNG. AU$TI N L 70. 14 29443 40.71 02115/2005 36.95 -
32.32~4062.2 YOUNG, DAVID & RHONDA 76. 14 35~29 39.05 1.80 02111/2005 37.25 -
30~ 7 4~35B6.2 YOUNG, FRED 62.40 27.11 35~29 01/24/2005 35.29 -
2440441868.2 YU, BEN & KAREN 139~58 44.02 51 .54 44402 12/14/2004 49 ~ 58 -
32.3244752.2 ZADZORA, TIMOTHY & ROBIN 39.16 21 .46 17.70 0211 6/2005 21 ~46. -
2245043784~ 1 2.f:\ V ALAt JOSE ~ 113.90 77 ~66 36424 0211 7 J2005 63400 -
24.04~22a4~2 ZEDWI CKt PHI LP & DEB RA 108.18 50.33 57485 01/31/2005 50.33 M
22.51.3110.2 ZEI MER, OALLEN E 62.50 30.52 31.98 03/09/2005 45.68 ...
Grand T ata Is: 68t078.80 31 ,542417 28,109.05 3t903.87 41523. 71
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer~Cust No () = {<} 880000001
Customer~Bill Cycle = 1
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(.......
c...:.
~~~lJ :.J~(~ (:J ]~~ ][~.';l~]Fi^~ ][Y~]l
p)} /\ ~'} j {.~ ryLr~rt:;
~ t 1;: --.1 ~ ~~ 1 ,t L ~ U J
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF C;"itv Ofl\:'1Gr~diru1
Schedule for March 16, 2005 City Clerl~ Office
Cycle 1
MAYOR: Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-21,
delinquent. water users shall have the right to request a pre
termination hearing prior to water service being , ..
disconnected. No water users having requested such pre-
termination hearing for March 15, 2005, water service for
the attached turn-off list will be terminated on March 16,
2005. The total amount of the turn-off list is $36,536.63.
;.-~.. .
(
CITY OF M ERJDIAN Derinquent Account List~ cou ncU Page: 1
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:55pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimu m Amou ntDelinquent Balance
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer.Cust No () = {<} 880000001
Custamer~Bill Cycle = 1
Last Pmt La st Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Oelinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
24.0440552~ 1 ABBEY BEN 74.34 31.53 42.81 02125/2005 42.69 M
23.02.4990.4 ABDERHALDEN, RICHARD 59.42 46457 12.85 02115/2005 75.00 -
23.02.1 930.2 ACUNA~ J ULI 0 & 46~ 1 0 31.64 14.46 02114/2005 80.00 -
30~ 7 4~2668. 1 ADAMSltCATHY 96.90 42.81 54.09 02114/2005 50~33 -
30.74.3602.2 ADAMS, CYNTHfA 58~48 23.19 35429 01/26/2005 114.48 -
23.02.0428.2 ADLERt JUSTIN 224.63 128.85 95.78 02117/2005 84.16 -
20.46~4602.1 ALBERTSONS 2~447.1 0 1 t 195.35 11251.75 01 11 8/2005 1 .195~35 -
22.50.024441 ALGERt BRENT 51.14 25~92 25.22 02107/2005 92. 18 ~
37.37.2904.1 ALL AMERICAN CONSTRUCTIOt 64.23 17.70 1 7 . 70 21 .00 7483
37.37.3248.2 ALLENt MARK & MJ CHELLE 69.36 47.78 21 .58 03/08/2005 .-45.00 -
37 ~37 .3822.1 ALLEN, SCOTT 91 ~67 35r29 35.29 21.09 01/18/2005 45.00 -
35. 35~0 194.4 ALLMOND, JOSEPH & TAKEJA B6~38 49 ~ 12 37426 02125/2005 50.00 -
36.68.0278. 1 AL V AREZt eLl FF 70.58 35.29 35 ~ 29 01113/2005 35.29 -
23~02.088a.1 ANDERSON~DEAN 61.72 25.22 36.50 02111/2005 25.22 ..
25~254401 0.2 ANGSTMAN. T~Jr 65.48 32.74 32.74 02101/2005 75.78 -
23~02~6300~ 1 ANSONt PATRICIA 92.92 44402 4B~gO 02122/2005 40~OO ·
24404~ 1664.3 ANSONt RICK & REBECCA 140. 11 81 .53 5B~5B 02122/2005 120.00 -
46.60.0010.3 ARMSTRONG~ JAMES & NANCY 35. 1 6 21 .46 13. 70
23.01.1510.4 AROUYET, GILBERT & MARIA 122.22 1 04.50 17472
30.74.3532.2 ASMUSS EN, JUSTIN 53~38 20~64 32~ 74 01/24/2005 28.98 ..
36~69~0530L 1 A TCHr SON, JEFFERY 11 9.38 72.81 46.57 02116/2005 84.64 ..
30.74.3660.2 A THERTON1 NOBLE 107.03 55. 1 5 51.88 0211 7/2005 141450 -
30.7443698.3 ATTEBERRY~SHELLY 97.90 29407 68~83 02125/2005 16~OO -
22.51 .3370.1 ATWOOD, CIN DI 77 ~62 41.12 36.50 02111/2005 36.50 -
37437.3616~2 AUSTI Nt WfLLIAM & DOROTHY 28.71 27.77 .94 01/12/2005 80.00 -
23.01.1 040~2 AZEVEDO, JOE & HEATHER 88.52 60.66 27.86 03/01/2005 50.00 -
30.74.0844~ 1 B AND V~ L.L.C. 70~3B 33~31 37407 01/28/2005 33.31 -
30.74.2554.2 BAB]CH~ TI M & YELENA 85.62 39 r05 46457 01 f18/2005 46.57 -
24.04.1290.3 BACONtTHOMAS & JANIS 153.02 49. 1 2 56~64 47~26 01/21/2005 50~OO -
30.74r3364.2 BAECHT, CARL R~ 63.22 24.17 39~O5 01/18/2005 73.36 -
46.46. 7002.2 BAILEY. MI CHAEL & AUN DREA 120.74 36~50 40~26 40.26 3.72
22.51.0694~ 1 BAILEY1 PEGGY 127.98 47482 4 7 ~ 78 32.38 03/15/2005 1 00.00 -
23.02.3550.2 BAILEY1 PEGGY 72.82 72~81 ~O1 03/07/2005 54.09 -
22.50.2142.3 BARAJAS~ ANTONIO & VELMA 162.46 84460 77 ~86 02115/2005 62.82 -
30. 7 4~3604~3 BARBEYt RODNEY & RHONDA 72.34 24.56 47.78 02/14/2005 4.00 -
22.50~2164.2 BARBEY. STEVE & LAU RI E 91 .90 55.40 36.50 02/14/2005 28.98 -
22.50~2360 .3 BARBEY.STEVEN 1 00. 19 33.37 27. 77 39.05 12/15/2004 41.83 -
23~ 01.2790~4 BARINSKY, CYNTHIA 169.28 77.67 54.09 17 . 70 19.82
23~01 ~211 0.2 BARROETABENA~ PHYLLIS 1 01 .68 30.66 28498 21 .46 20.58 01118/2005 40.00 -
23~O2~O472.1 BARTH, JEFF 55.88 26.90 28498 01/14/2005 56.98 -
25.25.1 078.2 BARTON. RANDY & JUDITH 66~82 27.77 39405 03/01/2005 35~29 -
22.51.0932.1 BAYVIEW ~ KELLOGG 60~ 1 0 26~23 33~87 01/26/2005 22.59 -
21.49.0902.2 B8Z INC 58.72 25~22 33.50 12/23/2004 30.98 -
22.50.102241 BEACH. ROXANNE 129.38 93~ 12 36.26 0211 7 J2005 60.00 -
20.4640258.1 BEAMGUARD. LISA a 1.90 43.67 38.23 02108/2005 85.62 w
31.52.0700.2 BECK. 61 LL 43.24 32.70 10r54
22.51.3080.3 B EEB Et MELI N DA 54~ 18 29.68 24r50 01/21/2005 29.00 -
24.04.1208~2 BEHRENDS. DALE 120.91 39~O5 42.81 39.05 01/07/2005 44~61 ·
24.04.2010.7 BELAI R, DENNIS 3 7 ~62 17.70 14.22 5.70 12/21/2004 113.87 -
22.20.0076.2 BENGOECHEA, TOMASA 61.96 30.43 31 .53 01/14/2005 73.94 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(-
CITY OF MERI DIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15t 2005 02:56pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDeHnquent Barance
Last Pm! Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22.51.2622.1 BENTLEY ~ DONALD 372+20 1 21 .56 125~32 125432 01/24/2005 121~56 ~
20.46r01 06~2 8 ERKHEIS ER~ RYAN 55.80 32.23 23.57 01/31/2005 55 ~ 00 -
254 25~g932~2 B I LLI NGS. RA YM OND & DELANP 158~43 35~29 76~57 46.57 01/21/2005 91 ~ 18 -
37.7240256.2 Bl RDG E, RICHARD & TONI 85462 39~O5 46.57 01/1 812005 87.95 -
24.0340328.2 BIS HOP t JEFFREY 111.86 35.29 76.57 01/19/2005 95.84 -
46.60.001 a~ 1 BfSHOP t LARRY & T AMI 35.89 31.43 4.46
24.04.1140.2 B LAS ERt GLENN 74.34 35.29 39.05 01/21/2005 89.46 -
374 37 ~3842~2 BLEDSOE. STEPHANI E 64.67 35~29 29.38 01/21/2005 60.00 -
23~02.15BO.2 BLESSENGERt RONNJE & HAZE 67~88 41.12 26.76 02115/2005 61 .88 -
30. 74~2332.2 BOBKO~RAYMOND 100.66 46.57 54.09 01/04/2005 152.58 ...
22.50.1726.2 BOES I GERt MAX 117.46 37.36 36r50 28.98 14.62 01/05/2005 85400 ..
30.30.6050.2 BONNEY, AARON 81~78 27.77 54.01 01/21/2005 223.21 ~
30~ 74.0660.2 BOSSART ~HI LLr CANDACE 123.69 1 O~29 113.40 10/1 8/2004 85: 70 -
37472.0206.4 BOYER1 KEITH 40~50 20~25 20.25 01/21J2005 20.25 -
30~ 7 4~3256.2 BRADYt MARK 64.23 26~ 13 38.1 0 01/2712005 40.00 -
22.50.1988;4 BRANDT. M. & WIEDENHEFT, A. 86.88 40.14 44.02 2.72 02123/2005 39434 -
22.50~ 2194.2 BRAUN, STEPHAN I E 78.36 56.90 21 .46 0211 7/2005 53422 -
22.50.4272.1 BREEDLOVE~ ANGELA 63~O6 31 .53 31.53 01/1 8/2005 82452 -
30~ 74.3974.2 BREEN, RICHARD 69.4 7 25.15 42.81 1.51 01/1212005 . 75.00 -
23.01 ~oaoo~ 1 BREWERt SID & SHELL Y 82.93 82.40 ~53 03114/2005 51 .00 -
23.02.3370~4 BRrGGSt TERI 143.48 67.92 40~26 35.30 0211412005 50 ~ 00 -
23.01.3510.4 B RI NEGAR~ E. E. 11 O~52 66.50 44402 0211 6/2005 77 ~ 64 -
23. 02r 1290.5 B RI NEGAR. E~ E~ 111.38 44.88 66.50 02128/2005 33~OO -
23402. 1650.1 B RI NEGAR~ E~ E. 80.62 59.27 21 . 35 02116/2005 60400 -
24.04~ 1762.3 BRUNGER~ LI NDA 124.34 27.77 96.57 01/27/2005 68.23 -
30.7443618.4 BURNSt EMMETT 19.99 17 ~ 70 2.29
24.04~ 2308. 1 BUTIERFlELD, CHARLES & TOf\ 247.30 87.93 15g~37 01/21/2005 166.81 -
22~51 ~029a.2 BYE,DEANNA 65436 32.62 32~ 74 02108/2005 68.42 -
30.74.2508.1 C W CONSTRUCTION 59~68 29~a4 29.84 01/18/2005 29484 -
22.50.072642 C.F.I.1NVE$TMENTS 59.64 34.42 25.22 02122/2005 25.22 -
22.50.0724.1 C. F .1. JNVESTM ENTS 70.26 25.92 25.22 19.12 01/24/2005 50.00 -
30~ 74.0396.2 CADA~ ROSE 63.06 31 .53 31 .53 02128/2005 39.05 -
30~ 74.0400.1 CADA.ROSE 66rB2 31 .53 35.29 02128/2005 35.29 -
23.02.0498.1 CADEt CHRISTOPHER 183~38 63r84 119.54 03/01/2005 122.98 -
23~O2.5870.4 CALDERON, TRACY & CARLOS 92.66 48 r 64 44~O2 01/18/2005 44402 -
35~35.01 06~2 CAMPAGNlt DAVID 79.38 36.50 42~88 02115/2005 90.00 -
30.30~6280~2 CAMPBELL, ROBERT 75~29 25.15 50~ 14 01/26/2005 43.00 -
35.65.0370.3 CARDIN. JEFF & GROUT~ BETH 39 ~ 06 39~O5 .01 02125/2005 46.56 -
35.65.0688.1 CARPENTER1 GAIL 51.78 24.01 27.77 02101/2005 72.38 ~
36.69.1122.2 CARTER, J. R. 51.15 46.57 4.58 03/01/2005 55.00 ..
35. 65.0608~2 CARVALLO, TERI 49.59 25.22 24.37 02128/2005 33.00 ..
23.02.685042 CASE1STEVEN 58.24 36.38 21 .86 03f01/2005 45.00 -
30. 74.0680~2 CASH~ MICHAEL 46.68 21 .46 25.22 02/09/2005 8.56 -
22. 50.031 O~2 CASS1 BRUCE C 98.22 21 .46 28.98 47 . 78 01/04/2005 119.02..
24.03.0850~2 CAST ~ PETER & VERIONICA 84.67 39.05 45.62 02117/2005 40.00 -
30474.380841 CHAMBERS, ARON 68.94 26.1 3 42.81 0210112005 46~57 -
22.50.372642 CHANDLERt NICKI E 94~BO 37 ~20 40~26 17 .34 01/31/2005 75.00 -
24. 03~OO7041 CHANDLER-ZUN DELt P A TRI efA 91 ~ 76 39 ~O5 42~81 9490 02115/2005 70.00 ~
24~ 03~OOg842 CHAPMAN1 P A TRI CJA & P A TRI CI 90.26 17.70 17 . 70 17470 37.16 12/06/2004 39.12 -
32.32.4084.2 CHAPPELL. JOHN 133.00 66450 66.50 02116/2005 52.74..
30. 74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGHt JAMES G~ 70474 24417 46.57 02122/2005 42.81 ~
23.02.4700.2 CHENEYt STEVEN 15 7 ~ 30 43~90 77 ~ 78 35.62 01/21/2005 65. 00 ....
23.02.6100.1 CHENEY1 STEVEN 80.40 43.90 36.50 03/0212005 30.60 -
30. 7 4~3676.4 CHENEY~ STEVEN 123.64 53.38 70.26 01/19/2005 113424 -
30. 74~3020.2 CHERRY1DARREL 62.24 23.1 9 39.05 02101/2005 90421 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
c ("
~
CITY OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:56pm
Current Perjod: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum Amou ntDelinquent Bafance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance NonMDelinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22.50~05DO.3 CHESTER. FAYE 59.00 34.42 24~58 03/01/2005 30.00 -
35.3540216~ 1 CHRISTENS EN t S. G. 26~O4 25~O4 1400 03/0712005 25.04 -
37 .37.3314~ 1 CHRISTIAN B ROS 13~54 9.27 3.48 .79
37.37.326a~ 1 CHRISTIAN BRCS CONSTRUCTI 12~59 8.77 3.48 .34
22.51.1174~2 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR & cor 75.18 48.83 26.35 02116/2005 131478-
22.51 ~ 1170.2 CHRISTIANSON ~ ARTHUR & COI 48.86 37.55 11.31 02116/2005 64410 -
36.68.01 00.3 CLARK~ BRIAN 48~ 40 44402 4.38 01/18/2005 83.00 ..
25.2540160.2 CLARK. CORTNEY 57~96 25.22 32.74 01/27/2005 28.98 ..
36.6940872~2 CLARK. GORDON & JENNIFER 77.41 44.02 33~39 0211 0/2004 480 . 00 ...
37.3744222r3 CLARK, KIMBRA 65.48 32.74 32.74 01/12/2005 1 08.40 ...
24.04~ 1248.3 CLAY, STEVEN & SUSAN 54.09 50.33 3.76 02115/2005 46~57 ..
25.25.4056.1 CLEVENGER. P A TR1CK & KUMlr 70~5B 31 ~53 3 9 ~ 05 01/1 8/2005 80.88 ..
25405L0344.1 CLlFF, DWIGHT 124.97 84. 1 7 40.80 03/14/2005 70.00 -
464 17.0708.2 ell NTON, GARRY & J ERrL YN PL 66.24 62.82 3.42
35.35.0189.2 CLOUGH, R.G. & PAM 57~96 28.98 28.98 03/09/2005 32.74 -
29.0740892.3 CLUPHF1 CHRIS 45~74 28.98 164 76 03/0212005 60.00 .-
22.5140874.1 COLE, ORVI LLE 80.58 46.66 33~ 92 02/15/2005 50 ~ 00 -
24.04408BBr 1 CONNELL. DJON 120.80 60.40 60.40 01/26/2005 77 . 38 -
23.02.1920~ 1 CON RAD I t LINDA 159.44 89.10 70.34 02/17/2005 1 04.1 0 -
30.30.6018.2 CONWAY, JOHN & ELAINE 57.70 28~9B 28.72 01/21/2005 33~OO -
23.02.3100.2 COPE~ WilliAM & REBECCA 81.38 41.12 40.26 02101/2005 32.24 -
23.01.0210.1 COR01NGLEYt MRS LARRY 69. 18 51.42 17.76 0212512005 25.30 .&
30.74.321241 COREY BARTON BUILDERS 55.50 26.52 28.98 0212212005 44.02 ...
22.50.1412.2 CORP, WESLEY 37.45 23.06 14.39 09/22/2004 100.00 -
24404.1746.1 COSGROVE. AMY 1 0841 0 65~29 42.81 02/16/2005 72~ 81 -
25405.0662.2 CRANEt JACK 96490 42~81 54.09 01/18/2005 88.56 ~
37.72.0228.3 CRONfSTER. DAVJD & TERESA 55~80 54.09 1.71
20.47~ 1178.2 CROW. JEFFREY 88.1 B 47.66 40.52 01/26/2005 40.00 -
22.5140742.2 CRUM. SCOTT & BECKY 68~ 14 35.40 32.74 01/31/2005 32.74 -
22.51.3260.1 CRW HOLDINGS LLC 226~24 112rOB 11 0.40 3.76 02125/2005 106.64 -
24~O440686.2 DA ROSA) J ULI E . 135~ 16 68.58 66.58 02116/2005 55.30 -
23~02.091 O. 1 OAI LEY. DON 54.56 44.88 9.68 02/28/2005 35~42 -
22.50~O284.3 DALE, MARK 52.22 21 ~ 18 17.70 13.34 12/21/2004 20 ~ 00 -
37.37.292042 DALEY~ NEAL 73.90 44~O2 29.88
22. 50r3a52~2 DtAMICOt JENNIFER 84~a6 30~66 28498 25.22 01/04/2005 27.82 -
20~46~O316~3 DANAHA,STEPHEN 49.53 36.97 12.56
36~ 69~ 164641 DANE BARLOW 157.04 148~ 71 4485 3.48
24~ 03~OO7842 DAVIS. LORAN & SHANNON 55.07 39.05 16402 02115/2005 1 00.00 -
22. 50~028B46 DAWSON, CAROL 1 02.96 25.92 51.46 25.58 01/21/2005 100.00 -
37.72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STI N E 78.1 0 39.05 39.05 01/19/2005 84.64 -
23402.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 66.46 32.62 28~ 98 4.86 01/26/2005 25.00 -
23~O2.1960.1 DICKSON1 DONALD M 133.90 45.86 4 7 . 78 40.26 12/13/2004 119.46 -
30.30.6142.2 DILECCE, COSIMO 70.80 17.70 17 . 70 17.70 17 ~ 70 11/1 8/2004 53.B8 -
35~ 65.0416.2 DILECCE, J DE & TERESA 74.34 31 .53 42.81 01/1 9/2005 74.34 -
22450.0204.1 DIPAOLA. JONATHAN 64.90 35.40 29.50 02109/2005 30 ~ 00 -
24403.0720.1 DOBARAN, JOHN & ARVELLA 22.62 11 ~31 11 ~31 0212212005 11 ~31 -
24404.1554.1 DOLL. THOMAS 140.68 47.78 92.90 01/13/2005 136.84 -
244044 1166.3 DONALDSON~ NEAL 76.76 32~74 44r02 01/28/2005 99.24 -
24403.0830.1 DONLON~ KATHRYN 105.87 31 .53 35~29 39.05 12/28/2004 61 .42 -
37.37~3302.1 DONNELL Y, SCOTT & MARLA 73.98 25.22 25.22 15.13 8.41
30.74.1062.1 DOTYt PAULINE & RON 72.24 51.28 20.96 02/22/2005 88.00 ~
35~65.0422.2 DREXLER, ADRIAN 63406 31453 31453 02/01/2005 24.01 ..
24.0441312r2 DRrpPS. NICHOLE 89438 42.81 46~ 57 02/04/2005 95.1 0 -
24.0442282.1 DRURY1 PATRICK 1 08.47 46.57 61.90 02117/2005 65.00 -
35.35~OO36.3 DUARTE, RACHEL 119.90 36.50 40.26 43~ 14 12/21/2004 115~OO -
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( (
CITY OF MERlO IAN Delinquent Account List... council Page: 4
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15~ 2005 02:57pm
Current Period; 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20f2005 12/20/2004 11120/2004 Date Amount
36468.01 02.2 DURHAM. KYLE 76.65 31 .53 31 ~53 13.59 12/14/2004 1 25.00 -
24404~Oaa6.1 DUVALL. DEBORAH 61 ~69 31453 30. 16 01/21/2005 65.00 -
23.02~501 0.1 EARLEY. GEORGE 54. 18 25.22 28.96 03/1 0/2005 29.00 -
30.74.11 08.1 EDDY. 0 ENN IS 68488 32.56 36.32 02/01/2005 36432 -
21 ~4B.1632.2 EODYS BAKERY 139~85 72.42 67 ~43 01/28/2005 72.42 -
21.48.1633.1 EDDY.$ BAKERY .52 .52 01/18/2005 3.48 -
30. 744367a~2 EDWARDS. DEARL W 117.57 26. 13 50.33 41.11 01/26/2005 45.00 ..
23~02.2734~ 1 EDWARDS, MICHAEL A 86~ 18 39~ 16 36450 10.52 01/24/2005 70400 -
22~51.2992.1 ELDtLARRY 112.08 26.08 41.12 44.88 01/13/2005 61.12 -
22.51.0758.1 ELITE CL EAN ER$ 41 0465 141.75 140.09 128481 01/04/2005 253.86 -
21.48.4850.1 ELIXI RIND USTRI ES 39~40 38.42 .9B 02/28/2005 37.44 -
37.72.01 01 ~ 1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO 200~OO 200.00 03/11/2005 116.30 ..
22r50.0514~2 ELLIOTT, KIMBERLY 68.14 39. 16 28498 01/18/2005 4.00 -
30. 74~3200~ 1 ENGLUNDt MIKE 64.20 25. 1 5 39~O5 01/1812005 73.36 -
23.02.1940.1 EPLEY t RITA 82.78 49.78 33.00 02128/2005 45400 -
22.50~ 1238~2 ERHART. MILT 1 05~34 9.90 21446 73.98 10/19/2004 127.82 -
22~50~ 1232~2 ERHARTt MIL TON 48.66 33~44 15.22 03/15/2005 40.00 -
23.02.0320~ 1 ESTEPt NINA 68.70 32.74 35.96 02/08/2005 33.00 -
23.02~2430.2 ETI ENNE, LUCRETIA 67478 35.22 32~56 01/26/2005 52.86 -
32~32.43a6.2 EVANS, DAN I EL, RHON DA 76~ 76 36.50 40.26 02115/2005 40.26 -
30.74.2686.1 EVANS t STEVEN & KRIS1TE 88.04 40.26 47.78 01/19/2005 120.82 -
22.51.0406.1 FARMERS & MERCHANTS 8AN~ 245.62 123.40 12 2~ 22 02128/2005 38.47 ,-
35.65.0262.2 FENWICK, J~ & LOGAN1 SHERYL 39.40 17.70 17. 70 4.00
22.50. 0260 ~ 7 FIELDSTAD, CHRrSTY 78~66 49.68 28.98 02/15/2005 80.25 -
22.50~O290~5 FIELDSTAD, CHRISTY 52~ 12 34~42 17 . 70 01/13/2005 95~ 78 ..
30~ 74~256842 FINLEY, JEFFREY 162.06 32~74 81 ~54 47.78 01/19/2005 76.06 -
37.724027441 FITZGERALD, JUANITA 99432 47.78 51.54 01/18/2005 44.02 -
23~O141160.2 FLA TEN ~ BOB 76464 36~38 40.26 01/25/2005 32.74 -
20.47.0008.1 FLATT, BRIAN & BRANDY 1 04.46 55.93 48~53 02107/2005 44~61 -
29.07.0878.2 FOL WELLt RITA 70.22 31 .35 38487 02108/2005 35.11 -
21 ~48.26g6.1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 500.14 233~ 15 266499 02115/2005 195~55 -
21.48.26g4~ 1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 2,320~22 1.069.86 1 ,250~36 02115/2005 1 .438.38 -
30.30.6212~2 FORSTER. PAMELA 136~53 25.15 72.81 38~5 7 01/19/2005 1 00.00 -
35.35.1414~3 FOX~ ERICK 73~OO 32.74 40.26 01/26/2005 28.98 -
24.04.1162~3 FRANKS, JAM ES & J ORIT A 1 02.00 52.8a 49.12 02103/2005 45.36 -
36.68.0142.1 FRAZEEt ANGJ E 77.15 39405 38.1 0 03/01/2005 40400 ..
22.51.307a~3 FREEMAN, NICOL E 28.58 27.58 1 ~OO 02115/2005 94416 -
24404. 1708.2 FREI NW ALD. CLA Y J R 44~92 36.50 8~42 02115/2005 90~OO ~
23.0140832.1 FRlENOS OF CHILDREN & FAMII 36.71 35.71 1.00 03/01/2005 26.35 ...
22~51 ~3660~3 FUHRMAN t JIM 27.45 21.18 6.27
36. 69~ 01 06~2 FURGASON. BONNIE 74.34 35.29 39405 02108/2005 35~29 -
20~46~ 0262.2 GABRI ELt RON & MARILYN 69.48 34.19 35429 02101/2005 35.29 -
25.25.4530.2 GALITZj KURT & J EANIN E 44.38 42.81 1457 02128/2005 45.00 -
23.02.4390.3 GALLUP t JOSHUA & EMI L Y 60.62 31 .64 28498 01/1 812005 17.13-
22.50. 1996~2 GARCIA. CHRI SSY 81.38 44.88 36450 01/26/2005 40. 17 -
20.46.0116.1 GARI BOVlC, KAS I M 103.79 36.97 35429 31.53 01/26/2005 72.22 -
22.50.0132.2 GARID EL. TROY 98.14 65.40 32.74 02116/2005 73.16 -
25.25.9904.2 GARVIN. MATTHEW 95.62 51 .54 44.08 02122/2005 91453 -
23.02.0950.1 GAYTHIWAtTE. RITCHIE & SUSP 94.00 4 7 ~43 46.57 01/18/2005 80.88 -
30.30~6220.2 GENTRY. LANCE 63.22 24.1 7 39.05 01/24/2005 39.05 M
30.74.3078.2 GENTSCHt NOREEN 21 2.45 83.57 125.53 3.35 02116/2005 80.00 M
20.46.0622.1 GONZALES. JOHN 77.98 38493 39.05 02109/2005 31.53 M
23.01 ~2090.1 GOSSEN, KELLI 68414 35~40 32.74 01/1 8/2005 1 01.20 ..
36r69.0376.1 GRAYSON~ GARY 92.66 46.57 46.09 02108/2005 69.00 -
37.72r0212.1 GREEN t J USTI N 79~54 40.26 39.28 02111/2005 45.00 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(.
CITY OF MERlO IAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 02:57pm
Cu rrent Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non..Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
32.32.4766.1 GREG HA TCHER CONSTRUCTI( 23.43 16.69 3~4B 3.26
32.32.4650.1 GREG HATCHER CONSTRUCTI( 1 O~52 7.04 3.48 02115/2005 1412-
22.51 ~3350. 1 GREGORY. STEVEN 59.64 30~66 28498 01/14/2005 25.22 ..
23~ 03~4012.1 GREYLOCH CUSTOM CABINETF 38.48 29.55 5.45 3.48
20.4740056~2 GRI FFIN, STEP HEN & MARY JO 69~ 12 36.38 32.74 01/26/2005 36.50 -
23.0244290.1 GROSSOt SHADOW 58.66 29.68 2Br98 02115/2005 80444 -
24.03.0034.1 GROUND t J ENN IF ER 138439 39.05 76.57 22. 77 01/1 912005 100.00 -
32.32~4688.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY 13.64 8~4B 3448 1.68
46~ 17&0534.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY 13.05 9.57 3.48
32.32.4304~ 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 29.76 20.95 5.44 3~37
32~32.4342.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 14r 73 9.57 3.48 1.68
32.32.434641 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 20.00 20.00
32.32.4330.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 18~49 13~33 3.48 1.68
32.32.4302.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 14.73 9.57 3.48 1.68
37.37.3300.1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 11.64 7~O4 3448 1.12
46. 17 ~ 04 15. 1 GUARANTEED QUALITY HOME~ 53r46 17.70 17 . 70 14458 3.48
22.50~ 2378. 1 GUTHMILLER, BRIAN A 33r62 30.66 2.96 01/18/2005 200.00 -
24~O4.1620.7 GUYMON, GREG & ALfSON 31 ~98 28.98 3.00 03/0212005 100.00 -
30. 7440074~ 1 HACKING~ DALE 40.56 40.26 ~30 02122/2005 4 7 ~48 -
30.74.276042 HAGAN, CHRISTOPHER & AMA~ 123. 14 76.57 46.57 02/16/2005 85.78 -
36.68.0268.2 HALE, LAWRENCE 75466 41.60 34 ~ 06 12/22/2004 45.38 ..
22.50.1512.1 HALL, LEO 92.88 39.27 53.61 01/21/2005 49485 -
23.02.3360.2 HALLt TIM OTHY & 0 EB RA 70.1 0 33~60 36~50 01/25/2005 72~84 -
37.37 ~331 0.1 HALLMARK HOMES 57.41 21.46 21.46 14.49 01/1212005 6.17 -
24.03.0810.2 HAMMER. MJKE 66r82 31.53 35.29 01/2612005 27.77 ..
35~35.3036. 1 HARDING, MARY 33~ 76 25.22 8.54 02114/2005 50~44 ..
23~O242612.2 HARMON. WJ LLIAM 50. 1 6 21 ~ 1 a 28.98 01/14/2005 25.22 -
36.6940578.1 HARRISt DEBORAH 91467 91 .61 ~O6 02/16/2005 138.20 -
37.37.3872.2 HARRIS, JOE & JILL 39.15 39.05 410 02/28/2005 46~47 -
24.04.0512.3 HARRISt KA THY 85.62 42.81 42~81 02115/2005 113.66 -
30.74.3230.1 HARRISON~ THOMAS 62.86 22~ 60 40.26 02122/2005 40.26 -
30.74.3334.3 HASTING, S H ERRI 59r46 24.17 35.29 02111/2005 35r29 -
22. 50~2112.2 HAYt CHARLES & ROBERTA 141 .55 52.17 50.33 39.05 12/23/2004 101 r56 -
22. 50. 2372~5 HAYCOCK~ VANESSA 83.54 40.73 42.81 01/21/2005 82.91 -
24404.1212~ 1 HA YLETT, MIKE 66.82 31.53 35.29 02/15/2005 80 .41 -
22.51.0326~ 1 HAYMOND~ DAVID A 92.66 44.88 47.78 01/31/2005 44.02 -
36.6940694.2 HEA TONt CHAD & HEATHER 144479 84.09 604 70 02116/2005 85400 -
23402.5070.3 HEFNERt C & BEAN, D. 84416 43.90 40426 02109/2005 36.50 ~
23~O242250.5 HENEYt TIMOTHY & JOANN 88490 44488 44~O2 02101/2005 56.32 ..
30474.244042 HERBERT, RANDY & EMIL Y 35.87 31 .53 4434 02/25/2005 40.00 -
25.05.0220~ 1 HESS I NG. WI LLIAM 227. 16 126474 1 00.42 01/19/2005 207.96 -
24.03.0036~2 H ESTER~ CHR1$TIN E 108.18 57 .85 50~33 02115/2005 50.33 -
24.03.0094.2 H ESTER~ CHRI$TIN E A 149.54 84~ 17 65~37 0211512005 42rB 1 -
22.51.0934.2 HICKEYt F.A~ & JEANE 71.90 42~92 28.98 02101/2005 8~56 -
22.51.065B~ 1 H1CKEY t JEAN 50.18 45.47 4L71 0211412005 80.91 -
22.50.0592.2 HI EBt J OHNN 51 r 14 25.92 25.22 02101/2005 69~94 -
22.51.3580.1 HIGGINBOTHAM, RON 170.80 89.26 81 ~54 02116/2005 51.54 -
34.34.6264.1 HIGHLANDER HOMES 212~ 71 138.02 57.49 17 ~20
24r03.0264.2 Hill, T ARA 80.52 40.26 40~ 26 01/12/2005 1 08.52 -
30~ 74.0688.3 HISLOP, TOM 57496 25.22 32.74 02117/2005 25.22 ..
29.07.0998.3 HISLOP, TOM 7841 0 35.29 42~81 02117/2005 46.57 -
29.07.1096.2 HISLOP, TOM & HATCHER, PEN g1~72 58.98 32.74 02117/2005 66.46 -
22.50.4810.2 HIXt MICHAEL 44.16 32.74 11.42 02125/2005 40.00 -
35.35.0221 .2 HOALST, JODI 139.44 54.09 85.35 02128/2005 50 ~ 00 -.
20446.0356~ 1 HOLDRl DGE, JOANN E 1 04.92 53~38 51.54 02128/2005 44~ 02 -
... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
(:-
t
CJTY OF MERIDIAN DeJinquent Account List~ cou ncif Page: 6
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15t 2005 02:57pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Sa lance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/2012004 Date Amount
30.74.1014~3 HOLLOWAY, JERALD K 1 05~ 74 32.74 36~50 36.50 01/19/2005 80.52 -
32.32.4630.3 HOLZER, ERIC & LI SA 420.26 42.81 377.45
22.51.0918~2 HOOD. CHAUNCEY 80440 40.14 40~ 26 02111/2005 6.54 -
22.51 .0446.2 HOOTS~ TRACf & RAMI REZ~ MAF 579.01 340.39 236.91 1.71
22450~ 0678.1 HOOVER, LYND M 165.83 72.69 50.33 42.81 02/16/2005 110.49 -
22.50~0680~ 1 HOOVERr L YND M 1 02.88 70.14 32.74 ~. 02116/2005 65.32 -
36.68.0132.3 HOSTETLER~ J EANIN E 24~56 17.70 6.86
36. 69r 1276.2 HOWARDt DONALD & CAROLYN 95468 95~ 68 04/21/2004 35~32 -
23.01.0420.1 HOWARDt TREVIS 1 05498 54.40 51.58 01/18/2005 1 02~02 -
22~20.00B4.1 HOWELL. P A TRICfA 37.63 30.66 6.97 01/26/2005 22.01 -
35.6540704.2 HUBBARD. SCOTT & ERICA 61.10 44402 1 7.08 02125/2005 37.38 -
35.6540708L 1 HUDDLESTON. CODY 203.63 87 ~a5 115~ 78 0211612005 60.00 -
35.65.0460.2 HUMPHREY1 KELL Y 78.10 42~a 1 35.29 01/2512005 42~81 .-
30~ 74.3436.2 HUMPHREYS. JASON & CHRIST 86422 42.20 44~O2 02115/2005 64.34.M
22~51.071442 HUMPHREYSt JOHN 63464 31 ~64 3 2~ 00 01/26/2005 82~OO -
22.51.0510.4 HUNT1 WESLEY a4~ 16 43~90 40.26 02/14/2005 44.02 -
36.69.0926.2 H UNTIl NGt DENNIS & RANAE 1 .344.50 44.02 66.50 44.02 1 t 189~96 02101/2005 44.02 -
30.7442944.3 HUSFLOEN. TRISHA 19.02 17 . 70 1.32 03/01/2005 15.00 -
25.25~4024~2 HYMAS, AARON 61. 72 28498 32.74 01/28/2005 78.56 -
29.07~ 1 064~ 1 HYMAS~ ARRON 81 .86 35.29 46.57 01/21/2005 .145.62 -
21.49. 1148. 1 IDAHO H EA TI NG AN D AI R 419140 139.80 139480 139.80 01/13/2005 136.04 ..
30~ 74.2856.2 IMMEGART, KURT 50.96 23.19 27477 01/27/2005 31 .53 -
24.03.4001.1 INTERSTATE BATTERY 4.06 4.06 10/19/2004 91 .68 -
20~46.022042 lVERSON. DAN I EL & JOYCE 68.14 35.40 32.74 01/26/2005 32.74 ~
23~ 01 . 1902.3 IVERSON. RODN EY 204.83 1 04.34 100~49
22~50.4506.1 JACOBSON t BErrY B. 47.36 25.92 21 ~46 01/18/2005 65.38 -
23423.3012.2 JAEGER.KEVIN & CLAY, TINA 1 07.48 39~ 16 36.50 31 ~82 01/07/2005 1 00.00 -
35.65.0666~2 JAMESON~ BRETT 59.30 27 . 77 31453 02101/2005 61~10 ..
25r25.0024.1 JEFF MANSHIP 51.78 24.01 27 ~ 7 7 01/18/2005 74.83 -
22~50.2096. 1 JEFFS. GEORGE & PATTY 93.64 45~86 47.78 02115/2005 40426 ..
35.35.502843 JENSEN, ERrC & CHRISTALINA 85.62 42.81 42.81 01/18/2005 94494 ....
32.32.414842 JESS EN. LELAND & GEN E 41.53 31 .53 1 0.00 0211512005 25.29 -
25~25.107442 JOHNSON, BRETT & MICHELLE 81 .86 39.05 42rB 1 01/1 812005 84.64 a
30~ 7 4~3642.2 JOHNSON ~ KEVIN 43.31 29 ~ 0 7 14.24 02114/2005 1 00.00 M
23.01 ~2710.2 JOHNSON. MARC 111 .38 41.12 70.26 03/14/2005 36.50 ..
29.07~OB86.3 JOHNSON. ROGER & HOLLY 51~78 24.01 27~ 77 01/21/2005 65.68 -
20.4 7 ~ 0068.2 JOHNSON ~ RONALD & APRI L 63~60 47.43 164 17 12/07/2004 150.00 -
23.02~ 1890.3 JOHNSONt STEVE & BARB 141.80 53.15 54409 34.56 11/09/2004 37 .25 -
22.51.4290.1 JONES. BRET 231.83 120.62 111.21 03/15/2005 105470 -
36.68.0320.1 JONES, DONALD 31.85 31 ~53 .32 02122/2005 26400 ...
20r47.1036.2 JONES, F AROL 104.16 68~93 35.23 02116/2005 125~OO -
22.50.2354. 1 JONES, OWEN 72.26 36.97 35.29 03/01/2005 26.26 ..
23~02.551 0.3 JONES, SAMU EL 82~65 64. 51 18~ 14
22 r 5 0.209 a 4 3 JONES, WES & CINDY 73.24 37.95 35.29 02111/2005 32.74 -
22~50.2122.2 JONES, WES & CINDY 133~gO 45.86 55~30 32.74 01/1 812005 95.48 -
22.50.2418.2 JONES, WES & CINDY 99 ~ 16 48.64 50.52 03/03/2005 60.00 -
24~ 03.082842 JONES, WESLEY & CYNTHIA 78.1 0 39405 39.05 01/19/2005 139.79 -
23.01 .2720~2 JOY 1t J ENN I FER 80.40 40.14 40~ 26 02128/2005 4144 7 ~
36~ 69.0568~ 1 JUDGE, ROGER & SANDRA 84.28 40426 44~ 02 02/08/2005 40~26 .-
20446.0802.4 JUDY. VI CTOR 157.38 89.46 67492 02117/2005 50.00 -
37437.3344.2 K W HOMES INC 35.40 29.70 5.70
32432.4648.2 KAOt DAVID & CHANG 19.41 17.70 1.71
36~6840224.1 KA VI LA, JOS EPH 74.34 35.29 39.05 01/1412005 84.64 -
23.0344020.1 KB WELDING 22.48 9.51 1 2~97 02128/2005 3r4B -
35.35~ 0391 .2 KEENEY, DARYL 85.62 42.81 42r81 01/21/2005 81.86 -
~*. in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
c. .." r ....:
Cln' OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List.. council Page: 7
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 15t 2005 02:58pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Min imum Amou ntDelinquent Bafance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non~Deljnq 01/20/2005 12/2012004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
30~ 74.3788.2 KEENEY ~ DOLAN & ELIZABETH 70.22 22.60 44402 3.60 02128/2005 44~02 -
23~O2.0952.3 KEITH~ WJ LLrAM & LORRAI NE 75434 55.34 20.00 02125/2005 39.06 -
24.03402B6~ 1 KELL Y t MrLLICENT 51.78 27.77 24.01 01/24/2005 27.77 -
24.04.1944.2 KIMBROUGH. CHRISTOPHER & 85r62 39.05 46~57 01/12/2005 1 04. 10 ..
22.50.059442 KINDALL, AARON & MISTr E 90.24 47.43 42.81 0211 7/2005 39 ~ 05 -
23.01.0160.1 KLUGt DA VI D 41439 37.36 4.03 01/18/2005 50.00 ..
24.04.1204.2 KNIGHTt TIMOTHY 48.02 24~O1 24.01 01/1 8/2005 20 ~25 -
22~5143570 .4 KNOX~ JERRY & NORMA 605r96 76.16 77 ~ 78 47.78 404.24 07/19/2004 50 ~ 00 -
46.46.62aO~2 KNUFF. 8 RYAN & S HERRI 66.82 31 .53 35 ~ 29 01/24/2005 39.05 -
30474.3962.2 KOCHt JOSEPH & VJ LMA 57.66 26. 13 31.53 02115/2005 93.26 -
24404.1858.2 KOCHt MICHAEL & SALrNA a 1.86 35429 46.57 02109/2005 39.05 -
36.69.0498~ 1 KOELLI NGt CRAIG 70.58 35.29 35.29 02101/2005 96490 -
24.04~2304.1 KOYLEt RUSSELL 85.62 39.05 46.57 01/27/2005 46~57 M
37.37.3116~ 1 KUEHL CONSTRUCTION I 42.92 17.70 25.22 01/27/2005 17 . 70 ..
20446.0368.2 KUPERtGREG a5~50 38.93 46.57 01/19/2005 79.08 -
22450.1750.1 LACY. MEL 122.25 29 ~ 45 65r29 27.51 01/19/2005 1 00400 -
29.07.0260.1 LAMBSONt MARSHALL 120.72 41.60 79 ~ 12 01/19/2005 1 00.04 -
22.50.4268~2 LANHAM, PA TRICE 145. 70 54.09 91.61 01/19/2005 175.21 -
23.01.0890. 1 LANTZtSTAN 56. 11 30.66 25422 ~23 03/15/2005 25.00 -
23.02.4490.2 LARSONt LEI F 65~88 59. 1 0 6.78 03/14/2005 50.00 -
35. 65.0260~2 LARSON~ WADE & LAURI 143~60 41 ~ 60 56L 64 45.36 01/19/2005 92~34 -
35.65.0300.1 LAUt TODD 40.26 36.50 3.76 01/21/2005 36.50 -
35~35. 040 1 .3 LA V ARELLO, MIGUEL & 8 RAN DI 81 .86 39.05 42.81 0211512005 82.84 -
35.65.0626~2 LAWTONt ANN 41 .83 39.05 2~78 01/26/2005 82.84 -
22.50~ 0600.2 LA YTON ~ JONATHON & FELl ell 84.16 40. 14 44.02 01/27/2005 32.74 ..
46.46.6318.2 LEE~ PAUL HOJOONG 69.24 40426 2a~98 01/13/2005 78.56 ..
30.74.126043 LEGGETT t CHAD & CHERYL 94.59 35429 35.29 24r01 01/05/2005 35.42 -
22.50.2428.1 LEONARD1 DAMON 108.20 54.95 53.25 02125/2005 50.00 -
30~ 74.3250.2 LEVITT t MONTE & JULIE 74.10 23.58 50r52 11/23/2004 75.00 -
23.0143250~2 LJ DDELL. J aSH & SARA . 136.92 62~B2 74.10 01/19/2005 181 .08 -
24~03.03B6.2 LIGHTFOOT, LANCE S~ 62.56 28.98 32.74 .84 02115/2005 65400 -
30. 74~3218.3 LINDSEYt STEPHANIE 67.96 25~ 15 42~a 1 01/26/2005 39 ~ 05 -
20.46.0328~2 LlNTONt CHAD 186.72 32.23 154.49 03/0112005 50.00 -
37~ 72.0292.1 LlSTONt KEN 74.34 35.29 39.05 01/24/2005 42.81 -
23~ 02.4070.4 LJ PROPERTIES LLC 65.21 31 .31 15~ 07 18483 12121/2004 44.86 -
30.74.3624.3 LUTHYt BRITTENY 45.90 23r 1 9 22.71 03/09/2005 50400 -
36.69.1556.1 MACEt JEFFREY & BERLENE 228455 50.33 178.22 03/11/2005 75.00 -
23.02.4480.1 MAORIDt JOSEPH F 77.00 37~95 39.05 01124/2005 73.36 ..
23.02.1410.1 MADSEN. JOHN 127.48 49~62 77.86 0210412005 85.38 ..
23.0143350 ~ 1 MADSEN, LOU 54.20 25.22 28.98 0210212005 75.00 -
35.35. 1 004~2 MAHALISKO, MIKE 111.86 69.05 42.81 02/16/2005 80.73 -
30.74.0394.3 MANTHA, TRAVIS & APRIL 61.72 28.98 32.74 02115/2005 28498 -
304 7 4.2642~ 1 MANWARING, MARK 100.95 39.05 50.33 11.57 02/15/2005 65~OO -
23402.1510.1 MANWARINGI MARK 138.22 59 r 1 0 32.74 28498 17.40 01/24/2005 1 0.00 -
20446.0792.1 MARCHAL~ BART 93.64 49 ~62 44.02 02115/2005 81.50 -
24.03.0056.2 MARCHANT, KIMBERL Y 66~a2 31 ~53 35.29 01/21/2005 68.62 -
36. 68. 0276~2 MARCROFT, BOB & ELAINE 361.86 17.70 337 ~30 6.86
24.03.0B06~4 MARCUM. CARL & JULI E 76.85 35.29 39~O5 2.51 03/01/2005 40.00 -
23L 02.5940.1 MARINEAUt SHIRLEY 93r24 48.96 44.02 .26 01/11/2005 40400 -
24r03~0396.2 MARKAR DESIGN 1 04~42 50.33 54409 02128/2005 54~09 -
36r69.0156.3 MARQUISt RON & SANDRA 47.06 44.02 3404 02125/2005 40.98 -
29.07.023642 MARSH,ROBERT 70~58 31.53 39.05 02128/2005 35.29 -
24.03.027443 MARTIN, BILL & DEANA 96.90 46.57 50.33 02114/2005 71~71 ..
23402.2520.3 MARTlN, CRAIG 1 88.99 111 .08 71 .35 6.56 01/24/2005 100.00 ..
37.37.2892.1 MARTINt RONNA 70.58 35~29 35~29 02/08/2005 35429 -
*** in Msg column jndicates no Notice is to be sent
(
~~ .
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page; 8
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15, 2005 02:58pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Min imum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35r64.0020 .2 MARTI NEZt RON 61. 72 28.98 32~74 01/1 3J2005 156.06 ..
30~74.1044~3 MARTINEZt ROSA 68.90 28.98 36~50 3.42
22~504 2424.1 MARTS, DEBI 63~40 30.66 32.74 03tO 1/2005 28.98 -
37 .37.3032~ 1 MARX. BRAD & JANA 86.41 42.81 42.81 .79
22.50.3714.3 MATEESCU, ROXANA 96.27 33.21 31 .53 31453 01/14/2005 70.09 -
36.68.001442 MATTOX1GARY 49.08 39.05 10.03 01/04/2005 75.59 ..
36.69~01 00.3 MAUPf N. BRADLEY 70458 35.29 35.29 01/24/2005 32.55 -
22.50.3888.1 MAXEY. STEFF ANI E 81.46 32.23 24.01 25~22 12/22/2004 27.02 -
30~ 7 4.2902~4 MeSAl NE. DONALD 67.96 25415 42481 02115/2005 119~3B -
32.32.4606.1 MCCALLfSTERt GARY 76~55 17470 21.46 15.21 224 18
36~ 6940458.3 MCCREARY, EARL 93.19 42.81 50.38 01/1 812005 135.00 ....
24.04.1880.1 MCCUE. DENNIS & RHONDA 85.62 42.81 42.81 02122/2005 39.05 -
22.50.0400 ~3 MCFADDEN. CLEORA 198.58 116496 81 ~62 01/21/2005 55.84 .... r
30. 74.2566~ 1 MCFARLAND. SCOTT & NA T ALII: 85.62 39.05 46.57 02104/2005 50433 -
37~374501 0.1 MCF ATE. DAVID E. 54~ 19 54.09 .10 03/07/2005 46.47 M
20.4741156.2 MCGOWN~ MARK & TRACI 37.36 36~3a .98 02122/2005 36.50 -
22.51 ~3246.1 MCKAGUE. RICK 109.96 44.65 42.81 22.50 01/03/2005 100.00 -
24.04.1798.2 MCKI NLEY t JAMES A 83.31 27.77 27.77 27 ~ 77 12/16/2004 139476 -
23.02.487044 MCKINLEY1 JUNE 141 ~24 61 .88 59.06 20.30 02114/2005 50.00 -
23.02.627045 MCKINLEY, JUNE 82~85 38.93 43.92 02114/2005 50rOO -
22.50.2126.1 MCMAHAN, BRIAN 136r68 56 ~ 16 44~ 02 36.50 12/21/2004 6 7 ~ 64 -
23r02.3B92~ 1 MCNALLEY, RUSSELL 117.15 35~29 42.81 39 ~05 12129/2004 121. 90 ~
36.36.1014.2 MCQUEEN~ ALLEN 113. 70 20~25 24.01 27. 77 41.67 11/29/2004 44.61 M
23.02.5590~ 1 MEDENA1 RAYMOND 64~95 35.1 7 29.78 02115/2005 30.00 ..
3646940062.2 MEEKER, LARRY 115.70 54.09 61.61 01/27/2005 57.85 -
23~O1.2730.1 MELLEN. ANGELA 156.13 64.59 91 ~54 02116/2005 81.00 -
23.02.6240~2 MENCHACAt ERNIE 86.94 50460 36.34 01/13/2005 1 08.96 -
24.04.2052.2 MENDENHALL~ ALAN 50466 50.33 .33 03/1412005 50 rOO -
22.51 .4362.1 MERIDIAN MARKET PLACE 322~O6 306.27 15. 79 12/14/2004 574.94 -
20.46~O198~3 MESERTH,ANDY 94.00 4 7 ~43 46~57 02/07/2005 78492 -
46.46. 71 05.1 MESSINA VrLLAGE M WATER F~ 11 .86 8.38 3.48 03/01/2005 6.42 M
22.50.3848r 1 MEYERS, DAN 1 00.90 51.19 49.71 01/25/2005 90.00 ~
30r 74.0052. 1 MILLER. E. ROG ER 30~32 25.22 5.10 03/1 0/2005 23.88 -
24.03.0102.1 MI LLER1 KENT & J ENN I FER 89.38 46.57 42.81 01/18/2005 61423 M
22.50.2352~2 MILLER~ SARAH 86.94 46~6B 40~ 26 02116/2005 88~42 -
20.46.0406.1 MI LLS, TIMOTHY 37.43 35.40 2~O3 03/15/2005 37 ~43 -
24.04.0538.1 MONSON1 THOMAS 49.92 49.12 .80 02116/2005 150~OO -
22.50.3856.2 MONTGOMERY~ JOSEPH & DO~ 182461 89.27 91 ~69 1.65 02101/2005 105.00 -
33.33.0002.1 MONTVUE PARK 41 ~42 18.83 22.59 01/26/2005 26~35 ~
33~33~0001 . 1 MONTVU E $PI NAL eLl N I C 19.55 3.48 3.48 3.48 9.11
22.51 .4214.2 MQORE.LAWRENCE & KRlSTiN 175.59 44~O2 47.78 55.30 28449
24. 044 1634~ 1 MOORE, RUSSELL C 275.56 17.70 21.46 21 .46 214.94 08/03/2004 1 OO~OO -
22.50~ 1202.1 MQORE1 TERRY A+ 88.44 45~55 42.89 01/18/2005 42.89 -
23.01.1 980.3 MOORTGAT1 JAMES & JENNIFEI 143~O3 131.96 11 .07
35.35.0205.2 MORAN, GLENN 7 4~34 35.29 39.05 01/25/2005 35429 -
37.37.2894.1 MORGAN CREEK HOMES 13~56 1 0.08 3.48
37~37.3610r 1 MORGAN CREEK HOMES 13.56 1 0.08 3448
24~03.0B89 ~ 1 MORNING GLORY #2 HOA 31 ~32 31.32
22.51.3112.6 MORRIS, AMBER 62r96 32.32 30.64 02125/2005 30464 -
304 74.002241 MORTON, MERRILEE PARK 936.79 412~ 50 408.74 115.55 03/15/2005 129.00 -
20446~O45043 MOSKOWITZ. ALAN & HELENE 65~ 72 36.38 29 ~ 34 01/26/2005 54.60 -
23.02.6050.3 MOWLER. JAKE 44.64 40. 14 4.50 03/07/2005 32.00 -
30. 7 4~3216.1 MU I Rt GRANT 63.53 24. 17 39.36 02116/2005 25~ 00 -
25~05.0816r 1 NAVA.BENNY 63~O6 27 .77 35.29 01/14/2005 71 .40 ~
35.65~O450.1 NELSON. MARl L YN 87.96 28~98 58~98 01/19/2005 130492 -
.** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
/ ~~. ..
:.. L
CiTY OF M ERI DIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9
Standard Payment Customers Mar 151 2005 02:59pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum Amou ntDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeJinq 01120/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35.6440054.2 NELSONt ROLAND & IDA 37.19 36.50 ~69 0212212005 28429 -
23402.1990.1 NEWBERRY, RICHARD B 1 ~38 44.88 36.50 01/07/2005 118.98 -
24.03.0660.1 NEWHOUSE, RAYMOND & TINA 92.33 35.29 46r57 1 044 7 01/2512005 75~OO -
25.25.4310.2 NlCHOLSt MJ CHAEL 33475 24.01 9.74 02122/2005 50 ~ 00 w
22.51 .0334.3 NIEHOFF1 DENNIS 90.88 39.16 51472 02123/2005 60.00 -
~37~3744214~2 N I ELSENt CLARK 54.22 46~57 7465 12127/2004 139.58 -
25~ 2549976.2 NIHAD BERRERJSTANN 35.40 17.70 1 7 . 70 01/26/2005 17.70 -
22.50.2238.2 NOSALSKIY, RUSLAN 166.92 56.32 62.82 47478 01/18/2005 69460 ..
24.04.2186.3 NYE~ KEVIN & ROXENNA 99~32 47r78 51.54 02122/2005 47478 -
25. 25~007 4~ 1 OLIVER CLEAVER 50.44 25.22 25~22 01/13/2005 5.32 ~
25.25~OO86.1 OLIVER CLEAVER 126.49 42.81 58.98 24.70 01/19/2005 100.00 ..
36~68.0234~2 OLIVOTTI r MI KE & JACOBI 4 7 ~99 42~81 5.18 02107/2005 55400 -
25.25.1 058.2 O.NEI LL. KATHLEEN 143.80 17.70 32r 74 25.22 68.14 11/23/2004 113424 -
24.03.0826.2 O-TOOLEt RHONDA 73~OO 32.74 40.26 02101/2005 32.74 -
22.51.3430.2 OVERTONr DAVID 54.36 54.36 07/0212004 56.31 ..
24.03.0044.2 PADGETIt DAVE & CHARLENE 87.23 46 ~57 40.66 02/23/2005 60 ~OO ..
22. 50~ 1770.2 PALMERt ELDON 374.1 0 14g~OO 123.83 1 01 .27 01/18/2005 126.93 ...
22.50~3732.2 PANGBURN~DAN 3B~23 32.23 6.00 02122/2005 21 ~ 77 w
30.74.268244 PASSANNANTE.DAN 240403 52~a8 75.44 1 05.52 6.19
30.30.6070.2 PASSANNANTE, DAN & ATHEN~ 80.52 40.26 40.26 01/26/2005 40.26 ...
3 0 ~ 30.6204.2 PASSANNANTEt DAN & LYNCH, a6~25 23.19 31 .53 31 ~53 01/18/2005 40 r69 -
20.46.0590.1 PECHTtBRYAN 64.74 36~97 27. 77 02111/2005 80.52 -
35.65.0346~3 PEDERSENt DOUGLAS & KATHF 37.50 36.50 1.00 02122/2005 72~ 00 ~
37.72.0110.2 PENN I NGTON, JAM ES 69~24 36~50 32.74 01/21/2005 28.98 -
36~ 69. 0452.2 PERCIFIELD. TIMOTHY & MISn' 78.1 0 35~29 42.81 02/25/2005 42.81 -
24.03.006645 PERRY, DOUGLAS & BARBARA 1 02.34 47.78 54.56 02/16/2005 41 LOO M
23.02.0960.1 PETERSONt JOHN 89.8a 45.86 44.02 02/11/2005 32. 74 ~
30.74.3518.3 PETTlGREWt JOSHUA 39~ 16 17.70 21446 02115/2005 52.04 -
20.46.0874.1 PETTI NGI LLt C~ B LAI N E 87.82 42.46 45.36 02114/2005 45~36 -
36.69.04 78~ 1 PHAKDY t SAM 1 OO~66 46~57 54.09 02128/2005 46.57 ..
23.02.3732.4 PHAM. KIMAN 65~4B 36.50 28r98 01/18/2005 125~04 -
23.0143130~2 PH I LIPS ~ ROY 74.82 46457 28~25 03/1 0/2005 1 00.00 -
36469~ 1 008~ 1 P H1LLI PSt ROY 59~30 31 .53 27.77 01/1 8/2005 76.14 -
304 7 4~3560.2 PICARD t VINCENT 77. 13 22~BO 22~ 80 31 .53 12/10/2004 66~ 78 -
22~51.4000.3 PIONEER FI NANCE, LLC 304.14 34~31 33~61 41.13 195.09 09/21/2004 50 ~ 53 -
37.37.2912.2 PISTERZlt JOSEPH & MAUREEN 50.44 17 ~ 70 32.74 01/18/2005 28.98 ~
24.04.1412.1 PLUMLEY. RODNEY & M~ NAOM 81.86 39 ~ 05 42r81 01/18/2005 84.64 -
23.01.1020.2 PONJEVIC. SENADA 128.66 21 ~ 18 17.70 21446 68432
23.02. 1840.2 PORTENIERt ROBERT & RACHE 132.80 37 ~20 4 7 L 78 47482 01/14/2005 90 ~OO -
24. 03. 0332~ 1 PORTERt DA VI D 69.24 25~22 44~O2 01/18/2005 79 ~3B -
36469.05 22 ~ 1 PORTER. DOUGLAS a4~28 40.26 44.02 01/13/2005 74.10 ...
36.69~ 1282.1 PORTER. JOHN 70~34 66.58 3.76 03/01/2005 7 4~ 1 0 ....
22451 ~O774~4 PREECE. ROBERT 43.32 12.01 31 ~31 0210212005 22.99 -
35435.0081 ~3 PRELLWITZ. BARBARA 91.72 58.98 32~ 74 02116/2005 62.70 -
23~02.041 B~2 PR1CEt DOUGLAS 89.18 74~ 14 15.04 03/15/2005 51.54 ~
35.65.0610.2 PR1MEAUX. MARK & KATRINA 93.14 39.05 54.09 01/12/2005 240.1 9 ..
23.02.5340.2 PRIVATSKY, K. & JOHNSTON1 TI 132.88 1 07.86 25.02 02122/2005 21 O~OO -
23.01.01 00.2 PYLICAN. WOODROW A~ 131.29 131.29 02118/2003 45.26 ..
31.52.0302.1 R T NAHAS FURNITURE STORE 267.01 48435 33.31 37.07 148.28 08/26/2004 96.70 -
36.69r 1652.1 R W BUDGE LLC 88.04 44.02 44.02 01/18/2005 51 ~54 -
24~04~ 1838.3 RADICAN, DONALD & CYNTHIA 69.50 36.50 33.00 03/14/2005 40.00 -
23~02.1570.2 RAMSAY, JUANITA 71490 39. 16 32474 01/31/2005 28.74 ...
24.04~2074.1 RAMZA, RONALD 47452 40.26 7.26 03/1412005 32.74 ~
304 7 4~3562~4 RANDOM, DUANE & MICHELLE 68.94 26.13 42.81 02108/2005 42.81 ..
304 7 4~3420.3 RANSOM1 P A TRI CIA 72.38 25.54 46.84 02116/2005 60.00 -
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
\
CllY OF MERI DIAN Delinquent Account List.. council Page: 10
Standa rd Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 02:59pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDeUnquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
23.01.1 050.2 RED CANYON CORPORATrON 83.45 26.90 25 ~ 22 17.70 13.63
23.02.2580.1 REED. DEBORAH 66.18 33.44 32474 01/1 0/2005 57496 M
22~50.2390.2 REEO~ LORETTA 152.98 77 ~OB 75490 02/16/2005 70.00 -
30.7440392.2 REES1 ARTHUR 69~ 14 25~22 25.22 18.70 02111/2005 75.00 -
37 .37 42954~2 REPACJt RANDALL & LYNETTE 93.14 42~81 50.33 01/24/2005 53.89 -
24.04.0542~2 RES, SHAWN 50.44 21 .46 28.98 01/19/2005 92.50 ~
35.35.1230.5 RESCH~ BRIAN & JAN ETTE 66.82 31 .53 35~29 01/24/2005 73~36 -
36. 69~ 0488.1 REYNOLDS, SAMUEL 69.23 69. 13 .10 02/25/2005 72.79 -
25.25.9896. 1 RICEt ALLEN & TERESA 61 ~ 72 2B~98 32.74 0311 0/2005 32.74 -
37.37.3118.2 RICEJ JAMES & LIZETTE 309.32 309.32 06/30/2004 123.26 -
25.05.045442 RILEY, R SHANE 80.52 40.26 40.26 01/18/2005 68426 -
37.75.011 041 ROARING SPRINGS Gr96 3.48 3448 02101/2005 18g~28 -
37. 75~O11241 ROARING SPRINGS WATER PAf 37 ~66 15.07 22~59 02101/2005 11.31 -
22.50.0258.4 ROBBI NS, ELLEN 69.12 36.38 32.74 01/27/2005 36~50 ~
22.50.0256.2 ROBS I NS, ELLEN 88~ 90 44.88 44.02 01/27/2005 40.26 ..
30. 74~2896.5 ROB ERTS, 0 I LLON 19.25 1 a~68 .57
25.25.1024.3 RODAM ER, LrNDA 47.50 28~98 18.52 ~ 01/26/2005 58.24 -
30.74.0406.4 RODGERS. ANGIE 133.16 28.98 1 044 18 01/13/2005 154.46 -
22~51.3214~2 ROEHR, ell NT 28~75 26.90 1.85 02114/2005 75.00 -
22.51 ~O866.1 ROHRBACH. CHERYL 70.36 40.14 30.22 03/08/2005 40.00 M
35.35.0105.2 ROONEY1 BRUCE & PAIGE 96406 40.26 55.30 .50 01/24/2005 95.00 ...
22.50.0130.1 ROSARrO~ SONY A 84442 40.14 44.02 .26 02122/2005 40 ~ 00 -
23.02.4710.1 ROSEtDEANNA 120.94 54.36 66.58 02108/2005 51 ~58 -
36.69~O544.2 ROSS. P A TRI CIA 85.62 39.05 46.57 01/25/2005 39.05 -
31.52~O269.2 ROUND TABLE PIZZA 454.92 454.92 03/1 0/2004 13.40 -
35.35.0058.2 ROWETT, BOB & DANA 85~62 39.05 46.57 01/14/2005 84.71 -
20.47.0074.2 RUMSEY, PHJLIP & JENNIFER 91 .42 49~62 41.80 03/07/2005 50.00 -
32~32.4020 .2 RUTHStGARY 73.00 32.74 40.26 01/27/2005 40.26 .&
23.02.3180.1 RYAN. WALTER 114.55 74.88 39.67 02116/2005 1 OO~OO -
31.57.0017.1 S & P SURVEYHOME, LLC 356.82 68.66 68.66 68.66 150.84
22.50.0090.1 SABAt VI RGI NA 167.08 79.23 87485 02/16/2005 84.09 -
22~51 ~3206.5 SALINASt MARIO & OLGA 25.83 24.12 1471
23.01 ~ 1200~2 SCHJMPH, FRED 141.88 75.28 66458 .02 02128/2005 60~OO ..
22.51 ~3720.2 SCHOWt BART & ALISSA 44.17 37.20 6497 01/26/2005 252~OO ...
46.46. 7060~ 1 SCHROEDER ENT 35.40 17~70 17 . 70 01/25/2005 68.52 ~
37 .37 .5056~ 1 SCHROEDER ENT 39.16 21 .46 1 7 . 70 01/25/2005 83.25 ...
24.03.0042~ 1 SCHWEND~ LUVMINDA 49.50 32.74 16.76 02115/2005 40.00 -
29.07.0984.1 SCOTTt JASON 48417 27.77 20.40 01/18/2005 1 OO~OO -
30.74.2880.1 SEARCYt ALFREDO 884 72 27 .11 61.61 01/26/2005 54.09 -
30. 74~271 8.2 SELLS, DAVID 1 04~34 61 .53 42.81 0211 7/2005 80.88 ~
23.01 .3342.4 S EMCHrSH I N, ALEX 56.46 22~59 33.87 01/26/2005 33.87 ...
34.34.6334.2 S EM MELROTH ~ A~ & J ENKI NS~ 0 24.58 24~O1 457
35435.2392.2 SEMMERt CHAD & MARY 61.72 32.74 28498 01/19/2005 79 ~54 -
35464.2028.2 SEXTON, MARY 120.91 31.53 46457 42.81 01 11 8/2005 80~33 -
30474.2632.5 SHANNON, CHRISTI N E 35.40 17.70 17 . 70
30430~6240.2 SHAW. KELLY 113.72 55.15 58.57 02116/2005 120.09 -
304 7 4~3370.3 SHAY, PAUL & JOYCE 55r06 19.66 17 . 70 17.70 12/23/2004 37.16 -
30.74~3570.3 SHAY, PAUL & JOYCE 56.86 17.70 17 ~ 70 21 ~46 12/23/2004 38.14 -
36.65.3092.7 SHELLEY, RALPH & DIXIE 94.46 44~O2 32.74 17~70 12/21/2004 38.36 w
22.5043780.2 SHELLEY,DIXIE & R. KENT 76.02 40.73 35.29 01/31/2005 51.35 -
30.74.3242. 1 SHELTRON. ROGER 78~ 78 29466 49~ 12 01/24/2005 49L 12 -
22.50.1902.2 SHELTROWN, ROGER & BONNJI 69.80 60~66 9.14 02/16/2005 83.96 -
30.74.3960.1 SHERARD, BJLL 65.77 25.15 40.62 02/15/2005 45.00 -
24.04.161843 S HlM ELr RYAN & SARAH 54.46 54.09 .37 02125/2005 65400 -
24.04.1878.3 SHrRLEY~ GARRY 78.1 0 35.29 42~81 02115/2005 39.05 -
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( (.... ..
\~
CITY OF M ERrOJAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 02:59pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountOelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Lasl Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 1 2120/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
22~51.0930.2 SHOBE. MONTY & CAROL 68. 14 35.40 32.74 01/19/2005 61~72 -
22. 50.02g2~ 1 SHOEMAKER, TAMI 52. 78 38.1 0 14.68 09/14/2004 1 00.00 ..
2540940058.1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 91.16 17 . 70 17. 70 17470 38.06
25.09.0006~ 1 SHUR-LUCK HOMES 68.92 1 7.70 1 7.70 17.70 15482
25.09.0002.1 SHURwLUCK HOMES 68.92 17.70 17. 70 17.70 15.82
24.03.0292.1 SHURTZt ROD ..134~37 57~85 76.52 0211612005 125.00 -
30. 7 4~309641 SIGMONDt SERGIO 1 0 7 ~ 44 57.11 50.33 02/16/2005 1 63r05 -
22~504 1920.5 SILVEYt BRYAN 76.02 36.97 39.05 01 127/2005 69.60 -
36.6941140.1 51 MMONS, JAY 62.16 61.61 .55 03/0712005 61406 M
23.01.2250.2 SIMON, BRADY 85~82 39. 16 46.66 03/14/2005 50.00 M
30. 74L2506~3 SIMPSONI KENNETH & AMY 126.60 79412 4 7 ~ 48 02116/2005 120.00 -
24404.1302.1 5lMSt ELLEN 45~ 11 25.22 19.89 02108/2005 264 79 -
22451.4034.1 SKINN ER1 KEN 42.64 21 ~ 18 21.46 01/31/2005 69.16 -
23.0243962.4 SLENDER. LEONARD & BOSWEI 46.68 21 ~46 25~22 01/26/2005 29.92.. I
30~ 7441 05a~2 SL YTER, GORD0N 76~ 76 36.50 40.26 02114/2005 90~82 ~
30.74.1118~2 SL YTER~ GORDON 133.58 47~78 47~ 78 38402 03/07/2005 50 ~ 00 -
304 74.1 050~ 1 SMJTHt CARSON 35.40 17.70 17.70 01/1 0/2005 46.52 -
35435.1210.3 SMJTH. GREGORY J 69~24 28.98 40.26 01 J28/2005 78.56 ..
22~ 51 .0498.2 SMITH ~ KARL 312~ 70 308.13 4.57
20.46.0380.4 SMITH, KYLE 11 0.70 50.44 60.26 0210912005 60.74 M
23.024 1700.2 SMITH, LEON & JAN r CE 105.90 54.36 51 .54 01/24/2005 44r02 -
22~50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 84~ 16 40~ 14 44~ 02 02109/2005 32.80 -
22.51.3090.3 SOL T AUi CYRI L 9 7 ~ 94 4B~50 49.44 02115/2005 45~68 ~
32.32.4822.3 SOMAZZI t ROGER & J ENNJ FER 79.71 42.81 36.90 03/09/2005 60.00 ..
24403.0836.3 SOSA~ JOSEPH 46.50 36.50 1 O~OO 03/01/2005 44.02 -
23.02.0900.2 SOUZA, JR., WI LLIAM 124.62 46.84 77.78 01/25/2005 , 22.74 -
32.32~4370 .2 STADTLER, CHARLrE & LAURA 39.50 21 .46 18.04
23.02.1830.2 ST AN$ ELL, KATHY 56.56 34.19 22.37 02/2212005 40400 ~
30.30~6334.2 STEELEt STEVEN & DEBSI E 121 ~ 75 28~O9 46.57 46.57 .52 01119/2005 124.00 -
30.30.626B~ 1 STETSON HOMES 40~50 20~25 20.25 03/01/2005 20.25 -
22.51.2801.1 STEVEN HILL 35.40 17 . 70 1 7 . 70 0.1/26/2005 14.95 ~
30~ 74.3470.3 STOCKTON r JASON & J ENNI FEF 75.86 20.64 55~22 01/21/2005 81 ~72 -
30.7442994.2 STOKESBERRY~COREY B 1.82 36.33 45~49 0212212005 45.49 ..
22.5044482.3 STONEt HAROLD 75.66 39.16 36.50 01/19/2005 1 05~26 ..
22~5140938~5 STRATE. EUGENE 64~ 1 2 42.20 21.92 02108/2005 5g~82 ..
23.01.1170.2 STRA TEt EUGENE & CARYN 55.39 50~82 4.57
22~50.457a .2 STRA TEt EUGENE & CARYN 25~ 75 21.18 4.57
23~23.0002.1 STUBBLEFIELD DEVELOPMENT 386.09 336.09 50.00 03/14/2005 25.00 -
45~ 20~08044 2 S ULLIV AN. MICHAEL & OTILLO 24.32 21 .46 2.86
234 02.1670~ 1 SWENSONt MILDRED 112.30 34.24 28~80 28480 20.46 11/2412004 23.40 ....
23402. 1730.2 T & T INC 208.68 117.46 91 .22 02125/2005 98~ 74 -
36.69.0484.6 T ADEVI Ct TOM 244.99 61 ~61 87 ~93 95.45 01/21/2005 66~35 ..
33~40.0002.1 T81 D-MOB 1-SL.LLC 407 ~5B 284.1 0 49~ 98 73.50 02128/2005 49.98 ~
20.4740052.4 TENNANT1 ROBERT & CONNlE 117~18 54.36 62~B2 02103/2005 115.86 -
23~O2.1190.1 TERRELL. A 143.95 32.62 111 ~33 02122/2005 35.00 ~
22.50414 76~ 1 THE DEN 225.48 80~64 76.18 68.66 12/16/2004 7 ~55 ~
29.5740104.1 THE PERFECT CUP 37469 11431 15.07 11.31 02109/2005 30 ~ 14 ~
22.50.1860 ~ 1 THE PODIATRY SLDG 52.16 26~Oa 26.08 01/26/2005 26. 08 ~
20.43.421 0 ~ 1 THE RAM 251468 160.96 90. 72 01/18/2005 8438 ..
23.02.2550.7 THOMASt DREW 11 0.04 21 .46 25.22 25~22 38.14 12/15/2004 35~ 15 M
36.69.0728.1 THOMAS1 POLZI N 60.42 36r50 23.92 01/04/2005 88.36 -
22.51.117243 THOMASMNDERSONPARTNER 18.86 7.55 11.31 01/14/2005 35.54 M
22.50.0350.1 THOMASSON, DAVID C 78.48 52.40 26408 01/18/2005 55.00 -
23402.4030.1 THOMSON~ LEROY 83. 18 17470 32~ 74 32.74 12/22/2004 50.40 -
25409.0052.1 THORNTON~ DON 97~34 17. 70 17.70 17.70 44.24
*** in M s9 column indicates no Notice is to be sent
\.~ { ..
~
CITY OF M ERI DrAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12
Standard Payment Customers Mar 15. 2005 03~OOpm
Current Period: 03/2012005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01 120/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
35.3545026r2 THORNTON ~ NI KKJ 30~OO 30 ~ 00 02125/2005 32.74 M
46446.6246.2 THRONEBERRYt BRIAN & KATH 93. 14 42.81 50.33 03/01/2005 46~ 16 -
23.02.2200~3 TODD ~ RI CK 94.34 32.62 32.74 28.98 01/28/2005 31 ~76 -
35.35.0423~2 TOMASZEWSKI, HELENE 80.52 36~50 44~ 02 02115/2005 36450 -
35 ~ 35.3078.4 TOMLINSONt JOSHUA 93.08 32.74 44402 16~32
36.69.0314.2 TOTMAN, JERRY..: 54~20 25.22 28.98 02101/2005 25r22 -~ .
33~33.9114. 1 TOUCHMARK 48.02 24~O 1 20.25 3~76 03/01/2005 20.25 -
33.33~ 9112.1 TOUCHMARK 44.26 24.01 20.25 03/01/2005 20425 ~
33.33. 911 O~ 1 TOUCHMARK 44~26 24401 20~ 25 03/01/2005 20.25 -
33.33.9056.1 TOUCHMARK CONSTRUCTION 55.54 27 ~ 77 27.77 03/01/2005 31 .53 -
33.33.9020.1 TOUCHMARK CONSTRUCTJ ON 63.06 31.53 31.53 03/0112005 35.29 -
37. 37 ~3958.3 TRAI L. CHARLES 28.04 21 .46 6~58 12/23/2004 79 .22 ~
22. 50. 3812~ 1 . TREGELLAS ~ MARK 111 . 62 56.32 55~30 02115/2005 85.10".
24. 04~ 0918 ~4 TUCKETT. QUETON & COLLEEN 53.38 32.74 20.64 01/04/2005 71.08 -
30. 7 4~ 23a6~2 TUPPERt PAXTON & APRIL 1 75.86 87493 87~93 02122/2005 123.38 -
22.50.3824~ 1 TURNBOUGHt JAKE & WENDY 69494 33444 36.50 02108/2005 28~98 -
22.50.4522.1 UGARRIZAt SHELBY 69~48 34.19 35.29 02/1 0/2005 24.01 -
22.50.0088.7 ULM ER. JEFFREY 56.58 21418 17.70 17 . 70 01/07/2005 37.16 -
23~01.0860.3 VAN BRAGTt WILLY 59~ 18 42.1 0 17 . 08 02109/2005 40~OO ..
25.25.1088.2 V AND EVENTER. DARREL · 73~OO 40.26 32.74 01/24/2005 30.1 0 -
24~ 04. 1980.4 VENAGLJA. JOHN 78.1 0 39~O5 39.05 01/18/2005 50.33 -
24403.0030.2 VERHEfJENt ERI C & CHRISTI E 54.01 24.01 30.00 0211 0/2005 35.29 ..
22~50.0136.3 VJCTORY~ CHRIS 1 03492 83.67 20 ~ 25 01/14/2005 82~88 ..
23.02~ 1860.3 VICTORYt CHRISTOPHER 92451 29.45 27~ 77 35~29 01/26/2005 107.50 -
22.50.45a6~2 VICTORY t MICHAEL & YUN$UK 47.74 24.94 22.80 01/24/2005 80.00 411
23r02.455041 VfNCENT. TOMMY 101.16 57 ~ 14 44.02 02128/2005 43418 -
22~51.3094~2 VNUK, JOHN 60r82 33.30 26.88 .64 02/01/2005 50.00 -
23.02.1430.4 WADDOUPS, DOROTHY 65~O4 25.92 25.22 13.90 01/19/2005 60.00 -
23.01 .2310.2 W ALKERt 8 ETTE 131.11 61 .65 61.61 7485 03115/2005 40.00 -
20446.0860.2 WALMER. TAMMY JO 41.67 38.93 2.74 03/07/2005 40.00 -
23401.3340~ 1 WALSH. RON 136.52 136.52
30.74.2540.2 WAL THALL, TRAVIS & TINA 44429 35.29 9.00 02/28/2005 30.05 ·
23.01 .0460.3 WARDLE. JOHN & CHERYL 173~50 1 0341 2 70.38 01/11/2005 804 78 -
20~4640540.3 WARNER. DENNIS & NlCOLE 75~66 39416 36.50 01/27/2005 32.74 -
21.48~2651.1 WATER WORKS CAR WASH INC 3~48 3~48 12/14/2004 63~26 -
22.51.3198.3 WEAST, WESLEY 126~ 12 57.96 68.16 02115/2005 65.00 -
22.51.3310.2 WEBB, MICHAEL 89~OO 43.88 45r 12 02115/2005 50.00 ~
23~02.1350.2 WEB ER, JOHN J 63.40 34.42 28.98 01/18/2005 72.84 -,
24~04.229B.1 WE1GHTt RICHARD 54.20 25~22 28.98 02108/2005 25.22 -
36.69.1658.1 WEIGLE. THOMAS & ANNETTE 132.06 40.26 44~O2 47478 12128/2004 44.02 -
23.02.5580.1 WELBORN~ KENNETH 89.26 46.45 42~81 01/19/2005 774 12 ·
23401.3300.2 WELCHt LEE 112.67 112.07 ~60 03/14/2005 157419 -
22.51.3770.2 WERNER. DALE & SUSAN 64.65 60.08 4~57
23.01.1110.2 WESTt JONI 72.88 40. 14 32.74 02/1 7/2005 55.18 -
22.50.2434.2 WESTEN HA VERt NAN ETTE 42.43 40. 14 2~29
36~36.1 082.1 WESTMINSTER HOMES 34473 26435 8.38 01/25/2005 6.42 -
22.50r23B4~4 WHITE, SHAINE 69412 40414 28.98 01/14/2005 56.38 ·
30~ 7 4. 3204~ 1 WHITE, TAWNYA 49.98 22.21 27.77 02107/2005 55.54 ·
30. 74.0064~2 WHITSITT, JOSEPH 1 00.58 66~58 34.00 02114/2005 100.00 -
35~3540097.2 WHITTED. NEll & CHRISTJNE 76.76 44.02 32.74 02111/2005 75.78 -
30.74.3708.3 WILBURN. STEVEN 97.82 55.15 42.67 02116/2005 110.00 ..
22.51.4230.1 WrLLIAMS, ELIZABETH 54r20 25.22 28.98 01/12/2005 28~9a ..
22.20~ 0090.2 WI LLIAMS, MARY 63.56 45.86 17 . 70 02108/2005 37.52 ..
46.46.709442 WilliAMS, $HAMBRrc & DONNJ 43.81 42.81 1~OO 03/01/2005 45.57 M
23.23.3988.2 WILSONt CLINTON 102.50 52.17 50.33 02108/2005 42.81 ~
...** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
( (
CITY OF MERlDJAN Definquent Account List.. cou ncil Page: 13
Standard Payment Customers Mar 1St 2005 03:00pm
Current Period: 03/20/2005
No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 11/20/2004 Date Amount
30~ 7440356.1 WILSONt DEANA 119.46 50.33 6g~ 13 02/1 0/2005 61 ~61 ...
25405.0416.2 WI LSON. DON & JAN 81 ~a6 35~2g 46.57 01/18/2005 93437 -
25.25.9984.2 WJLSONt JOE & AMY 36.76 36.50 L26 03/15/2005 40400 ·
23.02~2714.4 WILSON t RICHARD 54.90 29468 25.22 01/26/2005 25.22 -
24~04~ 1584. 1 WIND ~ JOHN 91.80 40.26 51 ~ 54 01/18/2005 93~60 -
29.074088042 WINKLER. GREG 68.58 32.74 35 ~ 84 02115/2005 65.00 -
22.50~2302~ 1 WI NTERTON t DARI N 76~64 36.38 40~26 01119/2005 584 78 ~
30474.0094.4 WINWOODJ RANDY & CATHLEEf 170.66 1 01 .62 69.04 03/10/2005 20.00 ....
20.47.1204.2 WIXSONt RYAN 90.55 57. 73 32+82 03/07/2005 55.00 ..
22.50.2426.1 WYATTt SAMUAL 135~ga 54.36 81 .62 01/31/2005 45~ 72 PK
24.03.0412.4 WYMAN1 DUSTINE 130.74 87.93 42.81 03/01/2005 46~57 -
30.74.0338~ 1 YEAG ERt ROD ERICK Sr 33.06 27.77 5~29 03/08/2005 30.00 -
30.74.0372.3 YELTONt LAURA 11 O~52 32.74 77.78 01/19/2005 86.90 -
23.02.0680.1 YOUNG. AUSTIN L 81 ~42 36~g5 44.47 02104/2005 75.70 -
23.02.0650.2 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 71.46 70 ~ 71 .75 03/14/2005 55.00 -
23402.0670.1 YOUNG. AUSTI N L 70.14 29.43 40.71 02115/2005 36.95 ...
32432.4062.2 YOUNG1 DAVID & RHONDA 76~ 14 35~29. 39.05 1.80 02/11/2005 37.25 -
30.74.3586.2 YOUNG1 FRED 62~40 27.11 35.29 01/24/2005 35~29 -
24.04.1868.2 YU, BEN & KAREN 139.58 44~O2 51 ~54 44.02 12/14/2004 49.58 -
32.32.4752.2 ZADZORA, TIMOTHY & ROBIN 39.16 21 .46 17.70 02116/2005 21 .46 -
22~50.3784.1 ZA.VALA~ JOSE 113.90 77.66 36.24 0211712005 63.00 -
24.04.2284.2 ZEDWICK. PHI LP & 0 EB RA 1 08~ 18 50.33 57.85 01/31/2005 50.33 ~
22.51.311 O~2 ZEI MER, DALLEN E 62~50 30 ~52 31.98 03/09/2005 45.68 -
Grand Totals: 68107 8~80 31 ,542. 1 7 28t 109.05 3t903.87 4t523.71
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer. Cust No () = {<) 880000001
Customer.Bill Cycle = 1
*** in Msg colu mn indicates no Notice is to be sent
c:.
ADA COUNTY RECORDER J~ DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT tOO 24
BOISE IDAHO 03131/05 04:06 PM
DEPUTY Bonnie OberbiUig 1111111111111111111111111111111111111
RECORDED-REQUEST OF 1051338562
Meridian City
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PARTIES: 1.
2~
City of Meridian
Don Burton, Owner
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreeluent"), is made and
entered into tllis /5'-(3 day of /htlrt.vfv ,2005, by and between CITY OF
MERID IAN, a mUllicipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY' , and Don
Burton, dba Kinetico Quality Systelns, hereinafter called "OWNER",
1 ~
RECITALS:
1.] WHEREAS, "OWNER" is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of
certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in
Exhibit A for eacll owner, which is attaclled hereto and by this
reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after
referred to as the "Property"; and
1.2 WHEREAS, I.e. S 67-6511A, Idaho Code, provides that cities may,
by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re-zoning that the
"Owner" tnalce a written commitment concerning the use or
development of the subject "Property"; and
1.3 WHEREAS, "City" l1as exercised its statutory autllority by tIle
enactment of Ordinance 1 ] -15-12 and 11-16-4 A, which authorizes
development agreelnents upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of
land; and
1. ~4 WHEREAS, "Owner" has submitted an application for annexation
and zoning of the "Property's" described in Exhibit A, and has
requested a designation of (C-C) Community Business District,
(Municipal Code of the City of Meridian); and
1.5 WHEREAS, "Owner" made representatio.ns at tIle .public hearings
both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before
tIle Meridian City Council, as to how the subject "Property" will be
developed and what improvements will be .made; and
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CRZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTE.MS PAGE "1 OF 10
(.....
/.:.-~.. .
(.. ..
1 ~6 WHEREAS, record of tIle proceedings for the requested re-zoning
designation of the subject "Propel1y" held before the Planning &
Zoning Commission, al1d su.bsequently before the City Council,
include responses of government subdivisions providing services
within the City of Meridian plalUlingjurisdiction, and received fuliller
testimony and cOffilnent; and
1 ~ 7 WHEREAS, City Council, the 1st day of February, 2005, has
approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and
Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached .hereto
and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full,
:hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and
1.8 WHEREAS, the .Findings require tIle "Owner" to enter into a
development agreelnent before the City Council takes final action on
fe-zoning designation; and
1.9 "OWNER" deems it to be in its best interest to .be able to enter into
this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered
into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and
1 ~9 WHEREAS, "City" requires the "Owner" to enter into a
development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the
"Property" is developed and the subsequent use of tIle "Property" is in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this development
agreement, herein being establisl1ed as a result of evidence received
by the "City" in the proceedi.ngs for re-zoning designation from
government subdivisions providing services witllin the planning
jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure re-
zoning designation is in accordance witll the amended
Comprehensive .Plan of the City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No~ 02-382, and the Zoning and Development Ordinances
codified in Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12~
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set
forth hereIn, the parties agree as follows:
2~ INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are
contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-018) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAG.E 2 OF 10
.;,:.~..... .
~
I~ .-
1~..:
3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreelnent the following words,
terms, and phrases herein contained in tllis section shall be defil1ed and interpreted as herein
provided for, unless the clear context of the .presentation of the same requires otherwise:
3~1 "CITY": means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this
Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government
subdivision of the state of Idaho, orgallized and existing by virtue of
law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue,
Meridian, Idaho 83642.
3.2 "OWNER": means al1d refers to Don Burton whose address is 544
West Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho 83642, the party developing said
"Property" and. shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of
the "Property".
3~3 "PROPERTY": means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of
"Property" located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as
described ill Exhibit A describing the parcels to be re-zoned C-C
(Community Business District) attached hereto and by this reference
il1corporated herein as if set forth at length.
4.
USES PERMITTED BY T.HIS AGREEMENT:
4~ 1 The uses allowed pursuant to t11is Agreelnent are only tllose uses allowed
under "Ci ty' s" Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Section
11-7-2 (C) which are herein specified as follows:
Re-zolling of an existing residelltial structllre located at 544 West
Clterry Lane, Meridian, Idaho to C-C (Conlnlercial COlllnlllnity
Business) w/ticlt allows for light retail business of Kinetico Quality
Wate]" of Treasure Valley.
4.2 N.o change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed
without modification of this Agreement
5.
CONDITIONS GOVERNING RE-ZONE:
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 3 OF 10
./...--. .. .. .
.f
f.
),
5 .1 Cross access to the parking lot to the east shall be provided in tile
form of a stubbed asphalt drive. The owner shall provide a cross
access easement to benefit the adjacent property.
5~2 The owner shall limit the hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00
p.m.
5.3 The OWl1er shall work with the City to o.btain alternative compliance
for the required landscape buffer along the north property line.
6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD/ CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and
the commitments contained herein shall be tenninated, and. the zoning designation reversed.,
upon a default of the "Owner" or "Owners" heirs, successors, assigns, to cOlnply with
Section 5 entitled "Conditions Governing Re-Zone" ofsubject "Property" of this agreement
within two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the "City" has complied
with the .notice and hearing procedures as outlin.ed in I.e. ~ 67-6509, or any subsequ.ent
amendments or recodifications thereof
7. CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF
ZONING DESIGNATION:
"Owner" consent upon default to the reversal of the zoning designation of the
"Property" subject to and conditioned upon the following conditio.os precedent to-wit:
7~ 1 That the "City" provide written notice of any failure to comply with
this Agreement to "Owner" and if the "Owner" fails to cure such
failure within six (6) months of su.ch notice.
8~ INSPECTION: "Owner" shall, immediately upon completion of any portion
or the entirety of said develop.ment of the "Property" as required by this agreement or by City
ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request tIle City Engineer's inspections and
written approval of such completed ilnprovements or portion thereofin accordance with the
tenns and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the "City"
that ap.ply to said Development
9.
DEFAULT:
9 .1 In the event "Owner", "Owner's" heirs, successors, aSSigI1S, or
subsequent owners of the "Pro.perty" or any other person acquiring an
interest in the "Property", fail to faithfully comply with all of the
terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with
the "Property", this Agreement luay be modified or terminated by the
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 4 OF 10
.f"" ..
(.... .. ... .
"City" upon compliance with the requirelnents of tlle Zoning
Ordinance.
9.2 A waiver by "City" of any default by "Owner" of anyone or more of
the covenants or conditions hereof shall ~pply solely to the breach and
breaches waived al1d shall 110t bar any other rig.hts or remedies of
"City" or apply to any subsequent breach of any suell or other
covenants and co.nditions.
10. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: "City" shall record eitller a
memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at
"Owner's" cost, and submit proof of such recording to "Owner", prior to the third reading of
the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of tIle "Property" by the
City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the
ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" co.ntemplated
l1ereby, the "City" shall execute and. record an appropriate instrument of release of this
Agreement.
11. ZONING: "City" shall, following recordation of tIle duly approved
Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the "Property" as specified herein.
12. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of cOID.petent
jurisdiction by either "City" or "Owner", or by any successor or successors in title or by the
assigns of the parties hereto" Enforcement maybe sought by an appropriate action at law or
in equity to secure the specific perfonnance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and
obligations contained l1erein.
12" 1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreemel1t, the parties agree
that "City" and "Owner" 811a11 have thirty (30) days after delivery of
notice of said breach to correct tIle same prior to the .non-breaching
party's seeking of any remedy .provided for herein; provided,
however, t11at in the case of any such default which cannot with
diligence.be cured within such thirty (30) day period, ift11edefaulting
party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty (30) day
period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with
diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure
may be extended for sue11 period as may be necessary to complete the
curing of the same with diligence and continuity.
12.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed
hereunder by either "Ow.nef" or "City" is delayed for causes Wl1ich
are beyond tIle reasonable control of the party responsible for suell
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 5 OF 10
(~...
(/'..-.....
perfOlmance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil
disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such .performance
shall be extended by the amount of time of suell delay.
13~ SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: Th.e "City" may also require surety
bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified clleck or negotiable bonds, as
allowed under Meridian City Code 912-5-3, to insure that installation of the itnprovements,
whiell the "Owner" agrees to provide, if required by the "City"~
14~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The "Owner" agrees that no
Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the
"City" and "Owner" have entered into an addendum agreement stating wIlen the
iluprovements will be cOlnpleted in a phased developed; and in any event, no Certificates of
Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,
cOlnpleted, and accepted .by the "City".
15. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That "Owner" agrees to abide by
all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the "Property" shall be subject to de-annexation if
the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall .not meet the conditions contained in the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances
of the City of Meridial1~
16. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this
Agreemel1t shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered ortlrree (3) days after
deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, addressed as follows:
CITY:
OWNER:
c/o City Engineer
City of Meridian
33 E~ Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
Don B.urton
I<inetico Quality Systems
544 West Cherry Lane
Meridian, Idaho 83642
with copy to:
City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 6 OF 10
./~~'''''' ,
t<
16.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by deliveling to the
other party a written notification thereof ill accordance with the
requirements of this section.
17. ATTORNEY .FEES: Should any litigation be commenced betwee.n the
parties l1ereto concemil1g this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to
any other relief as may be granted, to court costs alld reasonable attorney's fees as
detennined by a Court of competent jurisdiction~ This provision shall be deelned to be a
separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture
of this Agreement.
18. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto aclmowledge and agree
that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and
provision hereof: and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations l1ereunder shall
COllstitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to
perform.
19. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the parties' respecti ve heirs, successors, assigns and personal
representatives, including "City's" corporate authorities and their successors in office~ This
Agreelnent shall be binding on the "Owner" of the "Property", eacll subsequent owner and
any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property". Nothing herein sIlall in any way
prevent sale or alienation of the "Property", or portions thereo( except that any sale or
alienation shall be subject to the provisions 11ereof and any successor owner or owners shall
be both benefited and bound by tIle conditions and restrictions llerein expressed~ "City"
agrees, upon written request of "Owner", to execute appropriate an.d recordable evidence of
termination of this Agreement if"City", in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined
that "Owner" l1as fully performed its obligations u.nder this Agreement.
20. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not
valid by a court of competentjurisdictio.n, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from
this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions
contained herein.
21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises,
inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Ow.ner" and "City"
relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreelnents, conditions or
understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between "Owner" and "City", other
than as are stated herein~ Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration,
amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding ~pon the parties hereto
unless reduced to wliting and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns,
and pursuant, with respect to "City", to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of "City".
.DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 7 OF 10
/.....:.... .
I
t
21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the
subject "Property" herein provided for can be modified or amended without
the approval of the City Council after the "City" has conducted .public
llearing(s) in accordance witll the notice provisions provided for a zoning
designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed
amendment.
22. EFFECTIVE DA T.E OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective
on the date tIle Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning
Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of tIle "Property" and execution of
the Mayor and City Clerk.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18) KlNETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS PAGE 8 OF 10
(" .. .. .
-:~~~.. . .
~/-
l\: :.......
23~
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement
and made it effective as hereinabove provided.
OWNER - .KINETICO QUALITY SYSTEMS:
CITY OF .MERIDIAN
Attest:
STATE OF IDAHO )
; ss
COUNTY OF ADA )
On this ;'t;f"- dayof //!/lrc,[ , in the year 2005,
before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared. DON BURTON known or identified to me
to be the p-erson who executed tIle instrument and acknowledged to me that he have executed
the same.
".,..... ...,....
.,.,-' ....1. .le B l ""~
~ .. .......1..'" :t"...
~.... \P' .........~ ""...1_ ,
~.. e..~ ~
:~/NOT .,.~\
.. ;IIf" . ...g: ~ ...,.....
(SEAL) E I ..... ~ i 5 jNota Public for Idaho
: -&./:i : = .. · . ell
~ tfJ3. .. itBL I C l*": J Re dIng at: JJ1l?ri I t;. 1-
~ ~ · . ~ J
~ 7 e;. .. ~ t
DEVELOPM~i!'~Att~~tiT ~-04-018) K~ lea QUALITY SYSTEMS PAG.E 9 OF 10
"". . (j f-l IDt:.~ ..,~'
.~~ ......"
....,1.111"
I~~. ..
("
COffilnissiol1 expires:
STATE OF IDAHO )
: ss
County of Ada )
On this ;2.q-H'\. day of f1t\.fCl- , in the year 2005, before
me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and William G~ Berg, Jr~, know
or identified to me to he the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who
executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and
acknowledged to me that such City executed the same~
(SEAL)
I....I.....'.~
t.'. ~ L
~" ~CP · BAt:
$~#fI ",~_:.--a.... J'".r '"
- ~ , 00 ? ~
~ OTA ~ ~
: " Itl ~l :.
... "'" {) .
: * ......... ~ * :
: : :
\ e fll1BL'\C: S
" <F~ c;" ."0 i
~ ..r~ "'~ 00 ...'\..... ~
"'. ...~.. (. '" if...... 0 h.. """<.... ~..
4+.. ~Jj' 0 F l~ lY ~..,~
.....,. ".., Alb. k. 8 "".,
. (.. ~;It~
No(ary P blic for Idallo
Rksidi gat: fill e/~}J; 1ftA..
I 1. .
~Q:1.mission ex.pires: tJq' ~o /07
/ I
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-04-0 18)
PAGE 10 OF 10
t--,:..:..'Evhibi+ A '
1/~~~'~ ..
\..
TF !1. n F~79~ l- #~R ~~1 F1
i1 H=~~ U= t: ~ ~ ~ 1J-t. 3 ~l! LJ
SURVEYING
~~ lO(~:-C ~i~
250~~ Bogus Basin Rd. 0 BOlse, Idaho 83702
(208) 385-0636
Fax (208) 385~0696
Project. No.: 2805
Date: November 91 2004
DESCRIPTION FOR
PHILLIPS PROPERTY
A parcel of land being a portion 'of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 1 ~ T.3f\ja:
R.1W.: B.M~~ Meridian, Ada County, 'daho~ as shown on Record of Survey No.
, filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorderl Bojse~ Idaho under
Instrument No. and more particularly described as foHows:
Commencing at brass cap marking the South 1/4 corner of said Section 1;
thence along the South boundary of said Section 1
South 89051 'Don East 526.20 feet to a point; thence
North 04010i18u West 40.11 feet to an iron pin on the North right-of-way line of
West Cherry Lane, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing
North 04010'18" West 182.46 feet to an iron pin on the South boundary of
Meridian Manor No. 1 Subdivision) as filed for record in the office of the Ada County
Recorder~ Boise, Idaho in Book 33 of Plats at page 1989; thence along said South
boundary
South 89051 foon East 160957 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast corner of
said Meridian Manor No.1 Subdivision, said point being on the West boundary of Tedi
Subdiv~sioni as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boisel Idaho in
Book 35 of Plats at page 3022; thence along said West boundary
South 01 027'00 East 182.01 feet to an iron pin on said North right-of-way line of
West Cherry lane; thence along said North right-of-way line
North 89051100" West 151991 teet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
Said parcel of land confains 0.653 acre, more or less.
.~\()\I {j 5 20011
\\~c:oID~AN PUBLiC
. ~~j~JR}{3 DEfYT<
C;1Dccur.l~nt:l arid Se!Hn9s~coxU\1y DClCUmetltS\wOr(hda3\2605-dsS+doc ~ Jac
\ Exh\t>if B'
f..'~......
(\......
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of a request to Rezone 0.74 acres from L-O (Limited Office) to C-C
(Community Business), by Irma Jean Phillips.
Case No(s): RZ-04~018
For the City Council Hearing Date of: January 18, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
I. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written notice
mailed to property owners or'purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the property~ The notice of public hearing before the
City Council was posted upon the property under consideration more than one week
before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code. 967-
6509.
The matter was duly considered by the City Council at the January 18, 2005, public
hearing(s)~ The applicant, affected property owners, and :govemment subdivisions
providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were
given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence~
b. Written and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for written testiInony) and in the official meeting minutes (for
oral testimony) I
c.. The Planning ~d Zoning Commission conducted a p:ublic hearing and issued a
written recommendation on the subject matter to the City CounciL
d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered. the
evidence and the record in this matter..
. .2. Process Facts .
a,. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Idaho Code ~67-6509J 6512, and Meridian City Code ~9 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
@videnced by the' Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report ·
'. 3. Application and Property Facts
CITY OF MERI.DIAN FJNDINGS Of FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LA W AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S)o R.z..04-018 - PAGE lof4
/.....~..... .
\..... '-... :
I'~": :'
(<:...::. ..
a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the
Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
.verified that the property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance of these
findings is Irma J ena Phillips.
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a. See Exhibit C for the findings required for this application.
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the ".Local Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. ~67-
6503).
2.. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zoning maps thereof: The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the
Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City COlUlcil pursuant to Meridian City Cod.e
~ 11-17-9,
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5, A It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Warks Department and
any affected party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Site Plan dated
September 2004 as shown in Exhibit B and the Site Specific and Standard Comments in
Exhibit C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and ~he applicant shall meet
such requirements as a condition of approval of the application.
c. Decision and Order
Pursuant..to the City Council~s authority as provided in Meridian. City Code ~ 12-3-5 and
· based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
l~ The Site Specific and Standard Conunents are as shown in Exhibit B.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AN.O DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). RZ-04-018 - PAGE 2 of4 ,
i
l\ .
/r.<-...
/ .
\. .
E.. Notice afFinal Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
I. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to ldaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis~ Such request must be in writing, and must be filed
with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the fmal decision
· .concerning the matter at issue.. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the
time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review maybe filed,.
2~ Please take notiee that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code ~ 67..6521 an affected person being a .person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code~
F ~. Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Site Specific and Standard Comments
Exhibit C: Zo.ning ~endment Findings
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
,~uPG:
lS'.f?
day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED'
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOT.ED
· COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED'
~
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
. MAYOR TAMMYdeWEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
-------
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S)~ RZ-04..018 .. PAGE 3 of4
(':-~.....
AUest:
and City Attorney.
By:j u.uU
City Clerk's Office
Dated: 2 -l-cs
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S)_ RZ-04-0 18 - PAGE 4 Of 4
. /..
. .
.. . . . .
EXHIBIT A
Klnetico Quality Systems
RZ-04..018
Legal Description
."'"
., ..~~~. .
:Ji I '.J
: .TEALeY'S LAND
S~~~ING !
j,p. ~
irfI
2501 Bogus Bosin Rd. .... Boltle, Idaho 837~
(.201) aSS-OStS. .
Fa (208) ~O~98
I ; ~ -: i~.
. .:..
...:. :~..~ ~;.; ~:.it.:~~~: ~.:~ ~~~.~. ~.::~ ~~~~~.; ~ ~.~ ~.~.. ~.. :: .~.
PrQjeGt No.; 2805
Olate; November S. 2004
DESCRIPTION fOR
, · PHlWPS PROPERTY
A parcet of 'and being 8. )3ortion 'of ttle SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 1. T.3N.,
R.1W~t BJA.." MeRdJan,> Ada County. Idaho. as shown on A:rJ~rd of- Survey No.
T J filed for reeorct In 81s office of the Ada County Re'Cbrcr.t Solse, ~daho under
Instrument No. and more particutaTty deGO"bId .. fOl[ows:
Commencfng at braSs cap marking the South 1/4 cXimer of said Sectfoo 1;
thence arong the South bound8IY of said SectIon 1
South ~.51 .00. East 52 B.. 20 feet to a point; Dienes
North 04010'181J West 40..11 feet to an Iron pin on tho .Hartl) flght...of...way line of
Welt Chatty Lane. Sald paint beIng tne POINr OF BEGJNNl(\lQj thince contInuing
North 04"1(JJ1 rr West "82~46 feet to an Iran pJn on 'tria Ekluft1 boundary of
Meridian Manor No.. 1 SubclMs.fml, 8S filed for record In the _~ of the Ada Coonty
RecOlder, Bolsl9, IdahtJ In l!oOk 33 of Plal$ at page 1689; then. afong ~ld So utI1
boundary
South as-.fi1IOOU East 1-60.67 feet to an iron pln marking, the South&ast carner of
saId Merldtan Manor NO.1 SubdMaion.l said point boloS Df1 the West bOlJlldary of Tedl
S.ubdivlstont 88 fJled for'*oord P1.Jhft..ciffJco cf the Ada County R8Gdnfer. Sofae, Idaho in
Book 35 of Phifs at pas. 3022; thence aloog aaJd West boundary
South 01 ~roo Eaet ~01 feet to an Iron pin on sald Harth rfght<sf...way line of
West Cherry 'ana; thtf1.C8 afGng eafd -North rl9ht.of-way Ilna .
North 89Q5ffOo- Weet 161~91leet to the POINT OP BEGlNMNG~
Said parcel of land tontafns 0..653 acre, more-' or f9$s,
I
M~~\~
. y/
NOV IS ~
~~r
... ~
C~ud~/_IAoc:."~
(/,n. .
/
~.,
EXHmIT B
Kinetico Quality Systems
RZ-04--018
Site Specific and Standard Comments
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Rezon~
1.. The legal description submitted with the application is accurate and meets the
requirements of the Gity of Meridian and State Tax Commission.
2.. All development on said property shall comply with Meridian City Code~
3 .. "Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a Development Agreement (OA)
shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, property'owner (at th~ time of
annexation ordinance adoption), and the developer4 The applicant shall contact
the City AttomeYt Bill Nary, at 888-4433 to initiate this process. The DA shall
incorporate the following:
· Cross access to the parking lot to the east:shall be provided in the
· fonn of a stubbed asphalt drive. The applicant shall also provide a
cross access easement to benefit the adjacent property.
· Limit the hours of operation from 7 a.m~ to 7 p.m.
· The applicant shall work with the City to obtain alternative
compliance for the required landscape buffer along the north
property line.
4. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) application. shall be submitted for
approval prior to occupancy of the retail business.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
.1 ~ Final Approval of the fite hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
a4 Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 ~" outlet face the main street or parking lot
aisle~
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a s~eet which does not have addresses on
it
c~ Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d~ - Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb pafuted red 10' to each
side of the hydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers.
fit Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'~
I~~.'
( ..
< .
2~ The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length that is
not provided \vith an outlet shall be required to have an approved turn around"
3.. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
.4. Pro.vide a 20' wide Fire Lane for all internal & external roadways.
5 ~ Operational fire hydrants and temporary or pennanent street signs are required
before combustible construction begins~
6. Fire lanes and streets shall have a vertical clearance of 13'6"" This includes
mature landscaping.
7 .. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow co.ns'istent with the
11ltemational Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants sha]~ be
placed an average of 300' apart
8. The office/connnerciallot will have an unknown transient population and will have
an unknown impact on Meridian Fire Department call volum~.. The Meridian Fire
Department has experienced 2397 responses in the year 2003. According to a report
completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group our.requests for service
are projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the y~ 201 O.
9. Mai~tain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure~
I O. Provide a Knoxbox entry system for the complex.
II" The first digit of the Aparbnent/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level. _
12. All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within ]50~ of a paved
surface as measured around the perimeter of the buildinga
13. Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire
Codes~
14. All Common driveways shall b'e straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and
48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide.
15.. Any chemical storage must comply with International Fire Code, Chapter 27 r
· 16. Fire hydrants shall be no fwther than 400' from the most remote portions of the
building~
SANITARY SERVICES COMMENT:
1. Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your
proposal and submit stamped (approved) plans with your certificate of zoning
compliance application~
<.
('.
ACHD COMMENTS:
DIstrict potJey f'8Qu~ 7..fool wJda attached (or 5..foot det.a.ChBd) ooncrmte sidewalk on all coUector
roadways and arterial roadways (7204. 7~2),
Cheny Lana currently has a tDtaJ of BO-feet of right"of...way (40-fest from csrrtsrfJne) and is improved
wfth 5-traffic lanes with vertical curb. gutter and slde\valk abtJftfng the ~fte. Typlcalry. the District
requires devufopmel1fs abutting an arterial roadway to dedicate "Noet Df right-of-way from the
centerline pf tfna abuWng roadway.. Due 10 the fact that Cherry Uula is fully Improved' as a 5-Jane
roadway with .curb. gtJttar and sidewalk Bnd is not anUcfpated to be wfdened In Ihe Mural the.
a~pUr.snl should not be required to dedicate any additJonal right..of..waV or construct any addJttonaJ
street Improvements en Charry Lana al this time. .
2. DrlVDWays .
Dlstrlct tJQUcy 72-F5.. requfres drfveways located on coUectoror arterial roadways with a speed limit-of
35 to align or offset a mlnlmum of 15lMeat from any extsting or prQPOSC!d driVeway. .
Dfsfrltt poltcy 120?49.3I'88bicts commercial driveways wUh daUy tramc vortJme& over 1.000 vehjdes
10 a IlliUdmum wldtIl of 3fUeet. Uoet commercial drivewaya wfU be constructed as ~Il~..wl type
facilities. ff located on local streets" -CUrb return t)lpe dri'R3YlElYI with 15-toot radU wIll be feQ'lJired ro r
'driveYlays acceasfng aJlectQr and arterfaJ roadways. ;
Gl8V9led driveways abulUng public afreeta create maintenaoce problGlms due to gravel baing tracked
onto the roadway~ In accordance VIdfh Clrdrict poHcy_ 1207.9.1, the 8pp1fcanl should.be requfred to
~ave tile driveway Its full width end at least 304eet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the
roadvlay and lnalaJi PEi\t8ment f.ap(n with 15400t radii abutting the mdtdlng roadway edge.
The clto currsnUy has an eXisting 1 a..root wide curb cut driveway 1hallnl&raects Cherry lane
appmxJmateiy 25-feet weel of the east property Dne~ The applicant Is proposIng to uURze the e.xi9ti ng
1 ~foot YJide a.Jrb etJI drfve~. This driveway is located sllg hfJy to the east of the outbound travet
lane from Craatmont Drlw. DJatrId poJley l"fJqurres driv&wayB on colledorand arteriaf roadways with
a speed Umn 0135 MPH to be located In drrect alignment YJith any driveway or street or ~ffaet any.
drivewey or street by a minimum of 15o.teGl District policy also raquinn; all drivaways on collector
and arterial roadwaya to b& construClsd as curb tatum Iypa drivntays.. In aroer to <<Imply wtth
District potrcy the applk:lnt GhouJd remova the eJdttJng 18-faot wide curb cut driv~y !hat rntersects
Chsny Lene apprmdrnately 25-fsgf W98t of the Hat pI'Op9rty ina and reconstruct the drivaway to be e
curb ratum type driveway that ls 8 mSJdmum of 38.fset In tNtdth and In aUgnment wJtb Creatmont
Drive ~
3~ Other Access
Cherry Lane is classtfted as 8 pllnclpal arterial.. Other than the aocess pain I that has speciflCalJy been
approved wUh th is ap.plJcaffon. dImct lot access to Cherry Lane fe prohibited.
I
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Remove the exlatil1g i8-foot wfde OJI'b cut driveway that 1nlemect8 Cherry Lane apprQXfm.atGIy 25..
feat west of the east property fine and reconstruct the drtveway to be a curb return type driveway that
rs a maximum of 3S-feet in wkfth aJ1d In alignment wl1tJ Crestrnont D~~
.2. Other than the access palot that hasl1p9clflcaUy.bean approved with Ihls,applicafJonl direct fat access
to Charry. Lane Is prohibllBd.
3~ Comp1y wtth all Standard CoodJtfons of Approval.
3
j"~ .
t,:.... ...
f'~:.."
\.... .
D. Standard Coiidttlons of Approval
1. Any existing Imga1fcjn f~c:ittfes. shal~ be relocaled oulwde afthe right.Of..way~
2 r All utility refQcation wsts associated with fmprolifng s1reet frDnfage9 abutting the site stt~f be bo me
by the developer. .
3~ RepJaoe any BxJsUng damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may ba ~amaged during Ih e
constructlon of Ih~ Proposed devefcpmenl Contact Consfruetian ServIces at 387 -ti280 (with flre
number) for datans.
4 ~ UtUtty street cumIn pavement less than five years old are not afklwed unles.s approved In writfng by
the- Olstrtct. Carriact the Dletticfa Utilfty Coordrnator at 387~ (with lifs numbers) for detaits.
5" AU desfgn and conslrucflcn shd be in S9C0rdance with the Ada County Highws~ Ois trict Policy
Manual.. tSPVJC Standards and approved supplements. Conslruclfon servlces procedures and all
appJrcable ACHD Ordinances untees specifically waived harefn, An e ngJneer registered rn Ihs SIa ts
of Idaho shall prepare end oorUry alt improvemenl pfan8~
6.. The appUcant shall submlll'8v1sad plane for staff ap~ prior to .EslSlJBnce of buUdJng permil (or
other requfred permits). whJcI1lncalpCfa1es any required design chellgest
7. 1 Consbuctlon" use and propBl1ydeveJopment shalf bft In conformance with arl appUcabte requ1~mBnts
of the Ada County Highway Dlsbicl prior to Oisbict approval for occupancy~
8. Payment of eppUcabta road Impact fees are required prior to building ccnstnJction in accordance Wfth
Ordinance ##200. also kncwn 18 Ada County Highway Olotdd Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It '$ ~ m&pOl1sJbrnty of the applicant to verify all existing utUW. wMhfn 1he right..of-:WaY~ The
appJIGal1t 81 no cost (g ACHD shag rapajr m1sting utft!tles damaged by tile appljcant The appricant
sbafl be required to caR DIGUNE (1-800-342.1585) at least two full busln.. days prior to- breakJng
ground wtth!n ACHD rfghkJf.way~ The appUcant shart conlaat ACHD Traffic Operation! 38743190 in
the mrent ooy ACHD mnduUs (spare or filled) 818 compromIsed during any phase of constrtJctiGn.
10. No d1ange In the terms and conditions of ttis 8fJCJroval shall be varld unless they are in wrlUnG and
signed by the .appflcant or Ole 8JlJ)Rcanfs autnori!ed r&pmsantatlve and an authorized reprasenfalive
of the Ada County Highway District.. The burden IhsU be upon the arJplrcanl to obtain written
conflrmaUon of any change from the Ada County Highway Dmtrlct
11 ~ Any Change by the applicant In the planned ute of the pJ'OJ]etly whfch Is the sulljed of this
a~on. shal require 1t1e applicant to CC1mply 'wilh sfl rules, ragutatlansi (Jrdfnances. plans. or other
regulstoty and legal realrfcUonaln force at the time the eppDcant or ns 8ucc8saom tn intemst advises
the HfghYlaY Olstrlct d Its Intontto change the planned use cfths 8ubjecf; property unfess a
walverlvarianc. of saId requirements or mher legal rellella granted purslJanllo tha laW JrJ effect .:.t the
time: the change in use 18 sought
~.;'
E. Conc1usfons of Law
1. The proposed sUa p~rt Ie apPl'Uved,l Jf aU ofth& SIte Spectfic and standard CondJlioO$ of Approval are
saUsfied~ .
2.. ACHD reqotremerda are Inballded to aSsure that the Proposed uaeldevafopment wn I ~ot pace an
undue burden on the existing \f8hlcular and pedastJ1an transportation system Within the vicinity
Impacted by the proposed development
4
~\
/<'"00... .
(.
EXHIBIT C
Kinetico Quality Systems
RZ-04-018
Required Findings for Zoning Amendment
· STANDARDS FOR ZONING AMENDMENT
J
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and cirt1umstances of each proposed zoning
amendment in tenns of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence anslvering the following
questions about the proposed zoning amendment (11.. 15..} 1):
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with aDd in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, .if DOt, has there been aD application for a
Comprehensive plan amendmeDt;
Staff finds that the requested Community Business (C-C) zoning designation is in
accord with the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map, which delineates
the subject property as "ConnnerciaJ". The text of the Comprehensive Plan (page
99) supports a full range of cOIl1Il1ercial and retail uses in the commercial zone,
including offices, services, and retail.
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rc-zoncd in the
future;
Staff does not anticipate that the applicant intends to rezone the subject property
in the future.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be develo.ped in the
fashion that would be allowed under ~e new zoning; ,
Staff fInds that the proposed retail use is allowed in the proposed c-c zone~ The
applicant has submitted a written statement regarding the proposed use, which
states the following: ".. ~.a neighborhood friendly business that is retail in nature
but has minimal site visits by customers. Most of the business activity takes place
at customer's homes with the business site used for supporting offi.ce activity,
light retail of accessory products, and storage of the product that is installed into
customer's homes.."
Meridian City Code 11-19~ I.A states that "No building or other structure shall be
erected, moved, added to or structurally altered, nor shall any building, structure
or land be established or changed in use without a certificate of zoning
compliance issued by the Administrator~" A Certificate o( Zoning Compliance
(CiC) will be required prior to issuance of a building permit or occupancy of the
retail business..
1/..-.'..
(" ..
\....
The required land use buffer between the proposed connnercial use and the single
family residences to the north is 25-feet, which would eliminate approximately
half of the proposed parking area in the rear of the buil~ing. The applicant will
work with.City staff to obtain Alternative Compliance for the required north land
use buffer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance~ A 20-foot
buffer is required and provided along the .western property line between the
proposed business and the existing apartment building. Staff finds that the
applicWlt can provide enough required parking for the proposed business.
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned;
Staff finds that the City~s Comprehensive Plan has provided the applicant with the
ability to request the C-C zone for the subject property. Much of Cherry Lane in
the vicinity has already redeveloped from residential to office or commercial uses~
E.. Will tbe proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that slIch use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed development is designed in a manner that will be
hannonious with and appropriate in appearance with the existing neighborhood..
The applicant proposes to use the existing structure and anticipates making only
site improvements such as parking~
F. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses;
Staff finds that the requested rezone will not be disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses, if the required land use buffers can be provided within the
restraints of the site.. TI1rough the Comprehensive Plan process) the City
determined that commercial developlnent is appropriate for the area. Any future
change of use on the property that may have a significant impact on the
surrounding properties will require conditional use approval under current
ordinances, and adjoining property owners will have an opportunity to comment
Staff anticipates that the proposed retail building use will. not be hazardous or
disturbing to the neighboring uses. The Commission and Council should consider
the applicant's responses to staff Concerns and all public testimo.ny, oral and
written, before making this finding.
G. wm be served adequately by essential public faciJiti~s and services such as
highways, street, police, and rICe protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water, sewer- or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adeq uately any sueh
service;
( ..
(/~..:. .
On December 4, 2004, a joint agency/department comments meetillg was held
with representatives of key service providers to this property. Based on the joint
agency/department meeting and other comments received from
agencies/departments, staff finds that the public services listed above can be made
available to accommodate the proposed development. The Commission and
COWlcil should reference any written and/or verbal testimony submitted by any
public service provider, regarding their ability to adeq.uately -service this project.
B. Will not create excessive additional requirements at pnb6c cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic ,"velfare of
the community;
Staff finds that the requested uses will not create excessive additional
requirements at public costs for public facilities and services" Additionally, staff
finds that the proposed rezone would not he detrimental to the economic welfare
of the community~
J. Will Dot involve uses! activities, processes, materials, equipment, and
conditions that will be detrimental to any persons; property, or general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, ~oise, smok~ fumes,
glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed C-C zoning designation of the property does not
inherently allow uses that will generate activities, processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions that are detrimental to the general welfare of the
community.
J. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shaD be so designed as
not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets;
Staff finds that the proposed C-C zoning will not interfere with general traffic
patterns on any public streets. A stubbed asphalt drive for cross-access will be
required to the parking lot to the east, in anticipation of future commercial
development Please refer to the ACHD staff report for a full report on traffic
issues.
K. Will not result in the destrUction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
Staff finds that no natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by
issUance of this conditional use. Staff has not identified any natural or scenic
features on the site.
L. ,Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City~
~
)" ...
\,.... ... .:.
~~~........ ... .
(':..:... .
Staff finds that the proposed rezone would be in the best interest of the City by
allowing a property owner to make improvements to . the property for re-
development that would otherwise not be allowed without the rezoneJ
l,.
(... .
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
In the matter of a request to Rezone 0.27 acres from R-4 to O-T (Old Town) AND for
Preliminary/Final Plat approval for four single-family residential lots, by Susan Howard
Case No(s): RZ-04-016, PFP-04-009
For the City Council Hearing Date of: MarcIl 15, 2005
A~ Findillgs of Fact
19 Hearing Facts
a~ A notice of a public l1earing was publislled for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
th.e City Cou.ncil public hearing, tIle first publication appearing and written notice
Inailed to .property owners or purchasers of record withill three hundred feet (300')
of the external bou.uclaries of the property~ The notice of public 11earing .before tile
City Council was posted upon tIle property under consideration :more thaIl one week
before said hearing~ All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code g67-
6509.
TIle luatter was d.uly COllsidered by the City Coun.ciI at the Marc]} 15, 2005, pu.b.lic
hearing(s). The applical1t, affected property ow.nefS, and govermnent subdivisiol1S
providil1g services witl1il1 tIle planning jurisdiction of tIle City of Meridian were
givell full opportu.nity to express COlTIlnents and sublnit evid.el1ce.
b. Written and oral test.imollY was received on tl1is Inatter, as reflected in the records
of tIle City ClerIc (for written testilTIOny) and in the official lneeting millutes (for
oral testilnony).
c. TIle Planning and. ZOlling COlTIlnission conducted a public hearing and issued a
written reCOIUlne.udation 011 th.e subject matter to the City Council~
d. The City Council heard and took oral al1d written testitTIony and d.uly considered the
evidence and the record in this matter.
2~ Process .Facts
a. T.here has been compliance with all .notice and hearing requirelnents set fortI1 in
Idaho Code S67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~9 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by tIle Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Pu.b Ii cation and Proof of
Posting filed wit11 the staffreport.
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staffreport and tIle
PlalU1ing & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
CITY OF ME.RI"OIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DEClSION & ORDER
CASE NO( S). RZ-04-0] 6 I PFP-04-009 - PAGE 1 Of 4
(:.. ..
.verified that the .property owner(s) of record at tIle time of issuance of these
firidings are Mark and Darcy Manwaril1g.
4~ Required .Fil1dings per Zonil1g al1d Subdivision Ordinal1ce
a. See Exllibits E and F for the findings required for t]lese applications.
B~ Conclusions of .Law
1 ~ TIle City of Meridial1 s.hall exercise the powers cOl1ferred upon it by the "Local .Lalld
.Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C~ ~67-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zo.ning, Subdivision and
Developtuent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridial1 City Code, and all
current zoning maps tl1ereOL The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established tIle
Ilnpact Area and tIle Aluended COlTI.prehensive Plan of the City ofMeridian~ which was
ado.pted August 6, 2002, Resolutiol1 No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council .pursuant to Meridian City Code
S 11-17-9.
4. Due consideratioll11as .been givel1 to tIle comlue.nt(s) received frO.1U the govemmel1taI
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian platmingjulisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the pro.posed developlnent will 110t
impose expense upon the pu.blic if tIle attached conditiollS of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with tllis Decision, whic.h
sllall be sigtled by tIle Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by t11e Clerk UpOl1
the applical1t, the Planl1ing and Zoning Department, the Public Warks Departlnent al1d
any affected .party req.uesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description .in Exllibit A, the Preliminary Plat
dated December 15,2004 as sllown in Exhibit B, tIle Final Plat dated December 16,
2004 as show.n in Exhibit C, and the Site Specific and Standard COl1ditions in Exhibit
D. The conditions are cotlcluded to be reasonable and the applicant sllal11neet suel1
req.uireln.ents as a condition of approval of the applicatioll.
c. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and foregoil1g Findil1gs of Fact which are hereil1 adopted, it is l1ereby
ordered that:
1 ~ The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidel1ced by b.aving subln.itted the Prelimin.ary
:Plat dated Deceluber 15, 2004 is h.ereby conditiollally ap:proved;
CJTY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSlONS OF LAW A.N.D DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). RZ-04-0 16 / PFP-04-009 - PAGE 2 Of 4
(
~...
f... :.
\.....:... ..
2~ The applicant's Final Plat as evidenced by llaving s.ubmitted the Final Plat dated
Decelnber 16, 2004 is hereby conditiollally approved; and,
3. TIle Site S.pecific and Standard Co.nditions are as shown in Exllibit D.
D~ Notice of Applicable Tilne Limits
l~ Notice of Twelve (12) Month Prelilninary Plat Duration
Please take .notice tllat within one year after written approval by the Council, a fin.al plat
s11all be filed witll the County Recorder; otherwise, such approval shall become null
and void, unless prior to said expiration date an extension of time is applied for by the
applicant and grallted by the Coun.cil. The Councillnay autllorize an extension 0 the
final plat for a .period not to exceed one year froIn tIle end of tIle original one year
period~ (MCC 12-3-8.)
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takil1gs Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby 110tified that p'ursual1t to Ida.h.o Code 67-8003, tIle OWller Inay
request a regulatory taking analysis~ SUCll request .must be in writing, and lnust .be filed
with the City Clerk 110t more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision
concernil1g the Inatter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll tIle
tilne period within whicl1 a Petition for Judicial Review lnay be filed.
2. Please take .notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code ~ 67-6521 an affected person being a perSOll w.ho l1as
an interest in real property whicll1nay be adversely affected by the issuance or d.el1ial of
the conditional use .permit ap.proval may withil1 twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Cllapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Cod.e~
F. :Exllibits
Exllibit A: Legal Descriptio.n
Ex.hibit B: A.pproved Prelilninary Plat
Exhibit C: Approved Final Plat
Exhibit 0; Site Specific and Standard Conditions
Exllibit E: Zoning Amendlnent Findil1gs
Exhibit F: Prelilninary/Final Plat Findil1gs
By actio.n of tIle City Council at its regular .meeting held. on the
JJ-t~L/L, ,2005.
I
-~
I:::> -- dayof
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
CITY OF MERIDIA.N FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). RZ-04-0 16 / PFP-04-009 - PAGE 3 Of 4
(...00.. ..
/r-~...
t.....
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE :OONN.EL.L
VOTED
COUNCIL M:EMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER :KEITH BIRD
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE .BREAKER)
VOTED
Attest:
and. City Atton1ey.
Dated: 4-1 -oc;
CITY OF MERIDiAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-04-016 / PFP-04-009 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(
EXHlBIT A
Serendipity Place Subdivision
RZ-04-016
Legal Description
Rr~ - z () N F: I) f~ S(.~ I~ J I}:.r~I (:) N
it (.) 1-<
.s f~R.1:~N I.) I PI. J~\/ J)I f/\(..4L~ S l) BI)I \/ J S If)(\;
I )t~~l~ tl ll1cr l '5.. 2 ~ J{~';
~
i\ l~Al{CLL 0[' LAND LUCA"I"EU IN 1 fIr NORTHEAST ! !.,~ OF SECTION 12. TOV~!'"NSHrp 1 NORTH,
RANCE I \V.E:Sl~ BOISE I\-fFRflHAN, MER.fl.>!A0~, ADA COUNTY. IDA.I-I(), BEfNer \TORr
P /\ f{ . r [\". ~ f) I . }\ i\ J : '( 1) f"~: S ( : I ~ Il~ L [) /\ S FI~ ( ) I . r . (")= \ \~ S :
cor\-.Hvl FN(l\(f AllHL NURTHEAST CUHN~J~. ()~; St.,C nON 12~ T..~ N.. [{. ~ \v.. B, \1, TH FNc"L
s nO"2o',~O" L j04 Llj(! Fl'l:,!" j\LON(ilHE F.'<\ST f,fNL. ()F SAID SECTION J 2 TO i\ POINT !\llHL
IN1T:j-{SFCTfO?\ or N. i\"f.FHffH/\N S fRLL.J. /\.NU \V. ~...L\PJ..r A VENUE, THFKCf>.
S K(j<~~~rJ(f' \V ) Hl 00 FELT ALON(i- Tflt-: CLN.TFRI..INF OF \V. l\.L\PLL AVENUE TO A POINT A1
'(fir: INT~RSFCllnN OF SAri) \V. tvfAPI.F ..-\ VCNUF AND \v. FH~S..l STRf~LT, THF\CT.
S Off'2tr.3f)" L 2(J(;J~O Fl~E j ALONG THE C.TNTFRLINr Of; \v. J~H~ST STRl'YT TO A POlNT, THr,.
l{ F: ;\ I ~ r~ (" ) I N ~ I. (.) Ii" J~ I ( (~; INN l.~ (.: (.II ~~ r 11 [S i) r: S ( ~ j{ i 1> .1- [ ( ) N ~
lHf~~\J( -F CONTIN{ IlNfl S fHf:20'30" r. f)i).OO FF~~;.( /\1.nO~G SAID (l:.N.1 FRI JNL TO A POINf AI "1 Hi'.
INTERSECT[ON or \V FfR~{f STHFFT AND \V. CHEH [f)' ?\ VF1\UL~
THF:':CF S s~F~pr'15h 'A[ 1f;i\Jn FI-.Fl ALONCl .nn,. CF~' rCRl.INL or \v. CHF.RR~r. ,<.\ VENl.T TO A
f' ( .> J ~ ~[" ~
lH L:\LL N on<!o'..Hf> \V ALONC ~'J\SlFRtY HOL'NI L\R \.- t)r FR.t\:\ 1\.-H-jODL\N SliHDIV hH >N
(.)"7 . (.~ {) Ii: 1 ~~ { ~.. r . I "(.} :~ \ r J ( ) J N . r ~
( .~ ( ) N .r J N l..i I N <. ~ ::\ 1.. (" fN ( { S t\ I !) S I. f 111 ) I \ t .1 S {( ) N I-~ f ) t .r N 1 ) :J\ I {\.: : r 11l~: J. } ( ) 1 ~ I ~ (" ) \ \.; f N ( ~
. r t I i ~>\ { : f I. N 0 {r .: ~l~".J .. .5 ) ~. i.. 1 c~. C~{) 1-" J .... J. :.. . [" . I "() :.~\ J ~ ( J IN. t" ~
. r j I f ~~ \ ( .};~ N (} ( r: 2 ~ ) ~ ~; f ~ ~: \ \/ 2 j) r.~ r,}.,: l~. .. r .f (") /\ j. ~ { ) J N. f ~
1. I~.:~ \/ l !\~ (.J S j \ 11 ) S l.1 [~ [J i \/ I S j ( J N [) ( ) l j N I ) ./\}{ ~.~ r l-11-~ I ~. ( ) i : I . <. ) \ ~/ r N <. I.
lHl-]\CF. N S~:r'~P}'~5" I,. 17~LOO FFFT l"U Tnr. REAL P()INT (>F BEGINNIi\(; ()I~ lHI~
[) IXS(~ ~ IUr~~T. I <. ) N ~ (.. f) N T~ ^ rNrN (} (} ~ ~4 3 /\ (.~ l~. r~:s ~ T\.1 (".)}( ~~ () r~ J: ~.~~ss
;4~~~.i~i:~t~ ~~:'~:~ :::' \
'. '. ~ ~ )
j(lV
lJf.1: 0 I~. ?O~r,
~'ER~CH AN PUBLIC
JJ08XS DE;>T
~ ..:.. :. ~ .'
---;.:- :: .:: ~ ~"...
~.! ~. ~ ..: ~ ~.i:.:. ~ I ~
~ :'::;::l~ -:-
~>~
r. ~: / ~ ~
-=: ~ ~ . r:- ) ;:: ~ .~: ~:.
EXHIBIT B
Serendipity Place Subdivision
.PFP-04-009
Approved Preliminary Plat
.......: .:~:::................. .... .......
~ ~',.~,."n .,{ ';.j ~.:
~ ~ -=t ~ .7.:~. .; >~;
.:., ~ :.~
~ -~
3" ~ ~~
.. ~~.~::~~,: f.."
"'-=.04'" :;.; .
.... : . ~~........:++t-' ~ ~ ::: :
-4 ~ .
=r;.
r
'!-"-"- ,.. _.~.
.::
:P::?~
.... ~;.. ....... ..... I......,............ .... .. ...... ... ... ..
:... ~ ::. ~ ~ ~.:. :: l:.~~ ~
~ t~=.E oJ
I
t
i
::-: ~: :: 0) .~
~~~~
./.-:~.-.. .
f .
t. ...
rt;.~";..~.~ :-;=-:~..~ ~;~'::':-:~:,.":...::--..::~..r~.. .
. ..... ... ~ ~.... No-... ..... ~.~ d.. .... ....... ~
:~:; ........:~. t -;:. ..:::.;:.:;;. ....~.. ........ .....
~~~~~1~~~;:~~~~~(~~
. .... ..,-..:-- ~:,."... .,,:. - ~ ...... . ~-- .:0:- ..-c.
........ 1"1"".. .-.r.
~-1~
,;,..:j.,..io..:....;/.;;,.:~
~ <~~.:&~::.: f :{~:.?~ .-~."
~ .-..::- ~ - )) : ~ "i: ~
....i'": ~;.:; .~ :/ ~./~.. .. ~:::. f :::...
:-:; ~.~ ~/~~ ~..;::: -:.. ~ : : /:i ~
~::~:~:,:~..'.,". < . . .. ~ ~:l '." ~ .
: ./..:0-::: ~ :
. ~ ~ t; ~ > ~ ; : ~ . ~ ~~. ! ~ : . ."==:. . ~
:; t: ~ ~ ~ .. :.~ ~. ~ : :.; - ~
:. .~:w.t:k~.;"';'
. j~~~~:~ n~.
. . . .. . ......-................
~ <;.. ~.~. '"! .-~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ .::--;,...
~. .~~:~.~.+; ~
f~ .
(... . ~
f~.~''''..
to,..:..:... .
EX.HI.BIT C
Serendipity Place Subdiv.ision
P.FP-04-009
Approved Final Plat
. . .. .... . .. "--. .. . . . .-.-............... ~...... -. ...... .~~.....,...... ... .. .. ........ ....... . . .. ....-.................. . .-. -............. .. . . ...... ,... ---......-.....~ .. . .. ...... . .. .. .
S E R F \: DIP I n. r i~~~ (~ t:
S lJ 3D i\~t5IO;\
~:1 ~ .~~;
~
~
...~ :.; ~:... . ~.:.
~;~/.:~v. ~~ /.;....::;..~ ~:: ~ . :
~..~. ::e...::.... .( :". .t~~~. .;. .... .::..
~::. J. ::...~/ ,.
.....-:... <<.;. ....:: -:::~
.~. ..; :..; ':-.~.... j i/. .::. . :.
:...: ""<
........ ...
.1.~
:~J ;. ,
;.;: ..;.-.:
So %-
~~~~......:.: . . -::.:::-~;. .j
~ ,
~/ ~ ~ :..-: ..;
.~
~~: f:
:. ~ ~: : <-
~.: -: ~~d./:./.~: } ~M c~ 7
:~jj~~t-.n~.~.~~...n~,- ~.q~;~tf~.~:~~rJ~ .,..iu, !..'>. ~ I
i . - - ~ ~ . . ..~.. ... ~ .. ): ~ ~ i:F
~ ~ :.(11 ~ i.~"t ~ r~ ~ ~+1' .. \~
;1 f.~
1:::; : +~~n.r.::~~ ~ ~.f
!! ..~ ~.~ '., :, j~
! .. . ~ . ..: ';':"".~'" .-:.-
. . . . ~.n .... nj~" ..- ,-:,-_. - u -+- -+,..:.ii";"';;':~'.~._-" _. ..;....--.J
., ~ :-: .: .~:~.~:...<< .~ ~.~ ~~. "-":.... : ~~"=. . :0:.: ~..: <<..-. .~: ~ .......~
::. :. :....~.:....~ "i': ?~: :. :.-: ~.: .::;~ ..~ . ~ .-: .:.-:.":/-/ :-"/.
~ ~-:: . ~ -:- ....~.. ...."':::-. ~ ~... ~....; ... .~~ .~.. ...~ ~: ...:~: :..: ~..
.'-T.....~::.....~ ...:. :~d ~ -:i ~:-::: ~ "= -.. -=^ ~.~
(~.{ .:
. ~~ ~ ..'-r .... -::. -:- ~ ~...~ .: ~;~ .... .:. ~ ."-":. ...; ....... ....~.... d ~ :. ~ .: ~ ~ ... ..
.;.....::=- ~---:"". ::-.~-::::: .~ ~ .~/:/~::;...~.~ ..~/.::..
:~ ~:...~ ~:;: ~...-~-::~ ~;;>~: :~: :~~%:d~~~ ~ :":: ~\.== :. ~.:~ ~ ~.~.~~
~. : '.:.<..; ~ . ,.~ -/ ~ ,<<"..... ., : "'..... "..: .." ,'.
.. . -.. -~.. ,~{~~~,:~:~i/~~jt~~{(,~:~:~!~~~.:::~
l~ ~:.
~\.~ ~ .:;/~ :.~.. :.;~~. .~ :~:~~;~~::.-.. .;--: ..; :.~:.; ~ :.~./~~:.. ~~~ : ~
:...: -. ...~.;..: ....: :...
.l:
~..~ :~:-. t::- :~.: "::.r. ~
... ~ ~~:~:: ':"....~.:.. ~ ;~; ./~.~.::. / .~~~: --: s:- ;;-.::~ .~ ~.: ....;.... ~ ~.--:-/
,.~..~..... ..._-.~...._._..,.....~.~..... .-~.f
I~.: :. :: ~:. ~~. :
~~..~; S
~ I i.. .0.
. . ~_. .. . ..00 d.... n. .. .. . . .. J . . . . . 00.. -~. ..... J .. ~__. .._.... .. ..._ . ._. ... 00..... __.. .. . . ..
(:~:/~f~~~
... ... ..-............... . .. . -...- ~....................... .
::..-:.-::: . ..~ ~
.. ... . . . .. . .. . .. ... . .. ............
(
(' .
EXHIBIT D
Serendipity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Site Specific and Standard Conditions
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. All comments of the Rezone (RZ-04-016) application shall also be considered
conditions of the Preliminary/Final Plat (PFP-04-009).
24 Utilize a COlnlnon driveway for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. The p.ublic street frontage
for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, lnay be reduced to IS-feet (31.5-feet proposed). A note
s.hall be placed on tIle face of the fi.nal plat restricting fencing, parked cars or any
other obstruction within tile COffilTIOn driveway easement. Said COlnlTIOn driveway
shall be constructed a Inil1ilTIUlTI of 16-feet wide with crushed gravel and aspl1altic
concrete paving, as required by MCC 12-4-1.4.
3 · Prior to signature of the final plat by the City En.gineer, all structure( s) (excluding
perilneter fencing) on this site shall be removed.
1. Underground year "[ouIld .pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots ",,\~itl1in
this de-velopment. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation
s)7stems be su.pplicd by a year round source of \~latcr. The applicant shall .be
required to utilize any cx.isting surface or ~"T{ell --.vater for the prilnar)7 source. If a
surface or '\,vell source is 110t u'v.uilnblc, a single .POillt connection to tho culinary
v/utcr system shall be required. If a single point connection is utilized, the
dc~/cloper shall be responsible for tIle pU)lllcnt of aSSCSSlnents for the COlTIlTIOn
areas prior to siglluturc 011 tIle final .pIat b)' the City. E.ngitlccr. In lieu of
providing pressure irrigation service to each lot, the a.pplicant shall be
required to pay a well development fee to the City for each lot.
5. Any tree over 4" in caliper tllat is removed froln the .property sh.al! be replaced by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees
that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be COl1sidered as
replacemel1t trees for tllose trees that are rellloved (MCC 12-13-13-3).
6. If permanent fencil1g is not provided or is not existillg around the perilneter,
telnporary construction fencing to contain debris lTIUSt be installed prior to
issuance of building permits. All fel1ces shall ta.per down to 3 feet maXilTIUtTI
witllin 20 feet of all right-of-way. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with
MCC 12-4-10.
7. Unless otl1erwise allowed by the Meridial1 Fire Depaltlnent, provide a hydrant at the
comer of Cherry Avenue and First Street.
f.
l~:.
8. Sanitary sewer service to this site s.hall be via service lin.e exte.nsions from the
existing Inains located adjacent to the project. Subdivision d.esigl1er to coordinate
maio. sizing and routing with tIle Public Works Department Applicant shall
execute City of Meridian standard f0011.8 of easements, for any lnains that are
required to provide service. Cover over sanitary sewer luains s.hall be .no less than
3-feet froIn fi11ish grade to the top of the pipe. If cover is less than 3-feet fraln the
sub-grade to the top of pipe, alternate pipe Inaterials sllall be used .per the
Meridian Public Works Departluent's Standard. Specifications~
9. DOluestic water service to this site shall be via service line extensions frDIn the
existing mains located adjacent to the .project~ Subdivision designer to coordinate
main sizing and routing witll the Public Works De.partlnent. Applicant s.hall
execute City of Meridiatl standard fonn.s of easelnents, for any Inains that are
required to provide selVice~
10~ TIle following notes on the plat dated 12/16/04, .prepared by Briggs Engineeril1g,
Inc., .need to be revised or add.ed:
(3~) RelTIOVe seco.nd sentence regarding .ffilnl1TIUm 110use Size (no longer
required on .plat).
(11~) Il1clude "fencillg" and "any other obstruction" to the list of thin.gs
prohibited within the COmlTIOn drive easelnent.
11. Street signs are to be in .place, water system shall be a.pproved and activated,
fenci.ng installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved .by the Ada
County Highway District and tIle Final Plat for tllis subdivision s11811 be recorded,
pIlar to ap.plying for buildillg .pennits~
12~ All development improvements, including sewer, fellci.ng, micro-paths,
.pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to
obtaining ce.rtificates of occupallcy~
13. A letter of credit or casll surety in the amount of 110% will .be required for all
fencil1g, landsc~pitlg, alnenities, pressurized. irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc.,
prior to signature on t]le final :plat
14. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accolnpallying Acknowledgtnent.
15. Coordinate witll tIle Melidian Public Works De.partlnent and the Melidian
City/Rural Fire Departlnent to determine fire flow requirements~
16. .No variances, exceptions or reductions to the City ado.pted. dimensional stalldards
or uses are approved witll this .prelitninary/final plat application. All minimum lot
sizes, structure setbacks, a11d street frontages s11all.be Inaintained~
PRELlMINARY/FINAL PLAT STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(-.
1. All grad ing of tIle site sllall be :perfonned in conformance with M CC 11-12- 3 H.
2. Sidewalks shall .be installed D.n the perimeter of the subdivision pursuant to MCC
12-13-10-8.
3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the alTIOunt of 110% will .be required for all
fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc.., prior to
signature on the final .plat.
4. Coordinate fire hydrant placelnent with the City of Meridian Public Works
Departlnent.
5. TIle applicant sllall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems witllin tllis project will .have to
be relTIoved froIn tl1eir domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and
9-4-8. Wells may be .used for non-domestic purposes suc.h as landscape irrigation.
7. Compaction test results lTIUst .be subtnitted to tIle Meridia.n Building Departme.nt
for all buildil1g pads receiving engineered backfill, wl1ere footi.ng would sit atop
fi lllna terial.
8. The applicant shall be required to pay Public Works developlnel1t plan review,
and construction inspection fees, as d.etennined during tIle plan review process,
prior to signature 011 tIle final plat :per Resolution 02-374.
9. Applicant shall .be responsible for application an.d cOlnp.liance wit}1 any Section
404 Permittil1g that Inay be required by the Anny Corps of Engineers.
I O. Applicant s11all be respollsible for applicatiol1 al1d compliance with and NPDES
Permitting tllat may be required by the Envirorune.ntal Protectiol1 Agency.
11. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance .provisions or tenus of the ap:proved
annexation/conditional use does 110t relieve tIle applicant of responsibility for
compliance.
12. Final plat approval shall be subject to tIle expiration prov.isions set fortIl in MCC
12-2-4.
AGENCY COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. G.ne al1d two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallo.ns per luillute
available for duration of 2 :h.ours to service the entire project. Fire hydral1ts shall .be
placed an average of 500' apart. Internatiol1al Fire Code Appendix C. Unless
othetwise app:roved~ provide a hydrant at the comer of Cllerrv Avenue and West
First Street
(/:'~n.. .
2~ Acceptal1ce of the water supply for fire protection wi]] be by tile Meridian Water
Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Departlnent for bacteria
testing~
3~ Final Approval of the fire .hydrant locations sIlall be by the Meridian Fire
DepartInent~
a~ Fire Hydrants shall have tIle 4 ~" outlet face the Inain street or .parking lot
aisle~
b~ The Fire llydrant shall not face a street whicll does not have addresses on
it
c~ Fire hydrant luarkers s.hall be :provided per Pu.blic Works spec~
d~ Locations witll fire 11ydrants s11all l1ave the curb painted red 1. 0' to eac11
side of tIle llydrant location.
e~ Fire Hydra.nts shall be placed on comers wIle11 spacing permits~
f. Fire hydrants shall not .have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
g~ Fire hydrants sllall be placed 18" above finish grade~
4~ Operational fire hydrants, telnporary or pel1nanent street signs and access roads with
an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought 011
site~
5. B.uilding setbacks sIlall be per the ltltemational Building Code for one and two story
COl1struction.
6~ W11ere a pOltioll of the facility or building hereafter constructed or luoved illto or
within the jurisdiction is ITIOre than 400 feet (122 111) frOlTI a hydrant on a fire
apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the
facility or building, on-site fire l1ydrants and mains sllall be provided where required
by tIle code officiaL For b.uildings equipped tlU.OUgl10Ut witll an approved autolnatic
sprinkler system installed in accordance Wit}l Sectiol1 903.3~ 1 ~ 1 or 903~3.1.2 tile
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Grou.p R-3 and Group .U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be
600 feet (183 m)~
b~ For buildings equipped throughout wit11 an approved autoluatic sprinkler
systeln installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1 ~ 1 or 903.3.1 ~2, the
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 In).
7. All .po.rtions of tIle buildings located on tillS :project must be within 150' of a paved
sutface as measured around tIle peritneter of the building.
MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT
1. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The stal1dard established in th.e City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance will be followed.
( ~
2. Standard .Plall for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard
established in the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance will be followed.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. No dedication of right-of-way will be required. with tl1is application.
2. Relocate allY existing irrigation facilities and/or utilities outside of the rigllt-of-
way.
3. Provide a $3,500 deposit to the Public Rights-of-Way Trust FUlld for the cost of
the roadway improvelnents on '1 st Street prior to District a.pproval of a final plat.
4. Construct OIle residential CO.1TIlTIOn driveway, 16-feet wide, on West Che.rry
A vel1ue located 63-feet west of the east property line and a seco.ud driveway, 9-
feet wide, located 19- feet east of tl1e west property line as proposed.
5. Construct one driveway, 20-feet wide, on 1st Street located 46-feet no.rth of the
edge of pavement on W. Cherry Aven.ue.
6. :Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beYOJld tIle
edge ofpavelne.nt of tIle roadway and instaII.pavetnent tapers with 15-foot radii
abutting the existing roadway edge.
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existil1g irrigatiol1 facilities shall be relocated outside of the rigl1t-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with iluproving street frontages abutting the
site shall be borne by tl1e developer.
3. Replace any existin.g damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk alld any t11at Inay be
dalnaged durillg tIle construction of tIle .proposed developlnent Contact
Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file nUln.ber) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavelnent less than five years old are not allowed unless
approved in writing by tIle District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at
387-6258 (with fi.le nUlnbers) for details.
5~ All design and construction sh.al! be in accordance with the Ada COUllty Higllway
District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplelnel1ts,
Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless
specifically waived 11erein~ An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall
prepare and certify all improveluent plans.
t~ .
6~ The applical1t shall submit revised plans for staff approval, p.rior to issuance of
building permit (or other required pennits), w.hich incorporates any required
design changes~
7~ Construction, use and property developlnent shall be in co.nfol1nan.ce with all
applicable req.uirelnents of the Ada County .Highway District :prior to District
approval for occupancy.
8. Paytnel1t of applica.ble road. impact fees are required prior to building construction
in accordance witll Ordillance #200, also known as Ada County Higllway :Oistrict
Road llu.pact F ee Ordinance~
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities witllin the
right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existillg utilities
damaged by tIle applicant. The applicant shall.be required to call :OIGLINE (1-
800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within
ACHD right-of-way. The applicant s.hall COlltact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-
6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are cOlnpromised during
any p.hase of construction.
1 O. No change in tIle terms and conditions of this ~pp:rovaI sIlaIl be valid .ul11ess tl1ey
are in writing and signed by tIle applicant or the applicant's autllor.ized
representative and an authorized representative of the Ada Co.unty Higllway
District. TIle burden sllall be u.pon the applicant to obtain written confirmatioll of
any change from the Ada County Highway District
11. AllY change by the applical1t in the plamled use of tIle property whicl1 is tIle
su.bject oftllis ap.plication, shall require the applicant to cOlnply with all rules,
regulations, ordinances, plalls, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at
the tilne tIle applical1t or its su.ccessors in interest advises the Highway District of
its intent to change the planned use of tIle subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirelnents or ot11er legal relief is granted pursuant to
the law ill effect at tIle time the cllange i.n use is so.ught.
CENTRAL DIST:RICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
1. This .proposal can be approved for central sewage & central water after written
approval from a.ppropriate entities is submitted.
2. The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to al1d
approved by the Idaho Depalilnellt of Healtll & Welfare, Division of
.Environmental Quality.
3. Run~offis not to create a .mosquito breeding problem.
4. Stonnwater sllall be pretreated tlu-ough a grassy swale prior to discllarge to the
subsurface to prevent impact to groul1dwater and surface water quality.
(
('.-.'. .
5. The Engineers and arc.hitects involved with the design oftl1e subject project shall
obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a
stann.water mal1agelnellt system that prevents groundwater and surface water
degradation~
(
{,,,.u . .
~ . .
\:~....... .
EXHIBIT E
Serendipity Place Subdivision
RZ-04-0 16
Zoning Amendment Findings
According to Ordil1ance I 1-15-11, Gel1eral Standards Applicable to Zonil1g
AInendluents, both the P&Z Conunission and Council are required "to review the
particular facts al1d circumstances of eacll proposed zonil1g alnendlnent in tel1TIS of the
following stal1dards and shall find adequate evidence answering the foIlowil1g questions
about the proposed zoning am endluent. "
The following is tIle list of stalldards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by City Council:
A. Will the ne\v zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
The 2002 COlnprellensive Plall Future Land U.se Map desigl1ates tIle subject
property as "Old Town". 111 Chapter VII of tIle Comprehensive PlaIl, Old Town
uses will include a variety of residential uses including reuse of existil1g buildings
for residential uses, new co.nstruction of lTIulti-faln.ily residential over ground
floor retail or office useSA Further, the purpose of the requested 0- T district is to
aCCOlTIlTIodate al1d e.ncourage further ex.pansio.n of tIle historical core of the
COffilTIUnity; to delineate a centralized activity center alld to el1CQnrage its rel1ewal,
revitalization alld growth as the public, quasi-public, cultural, financial and
recreational center of tIle City. A variety of theses uses integrated wit11 genera]
business, luediulu-11igh to l1igh density residential, a.nd other related uses is
encouraged in. an effolt to provide tIle appropriate tnix of activities necessary to
establish. a tluly urball City center (MCC 11-7-2.L)~ City Council finds tl1at tIle
requested 0- T zonil1g generally confonns to tIle stated purpose and iute!lt of tIle
Old Town designation withil1 MCC and tIle COlnprellel1sive Plan. In additiOl1, ill
tIle applicant's cover letter several COlnprellensive Pla.n policies are listed, whicl1
support the rezone and proposed residential use of tIle prope11y~
City Council fillds the following Goals, Objectives, and Actioll items COl1tained in
the 2002 COlnprellel1sive Plan to be applicable to this a.pplication:
· "Encourage infill development ill vacant/underdeveloped areas withl11 the City
over fringe area development to l1alt tIle outward progressioll of .urban
developlnellt." (Cl1apter V, Goal I, Objective A~3)
This is an infil] parcel that is cUITel1tI y receiving city serv.ices~ Redevelopmellt
of tllis parcel will allow for additional housillg units close to establis.hed
sclloo1s, cOlmnercial services, and the dOwlltown core~
!.,........ .
(.;
· "PrOlTIote al1d strengthen high density residel1tial development in and around
downtown" (Chapter V, Goal II, Objective A, Action itelll 5)
City Council is sup.portive of the pro.posed higher del1sity residential
development ill downtowl1~
· "Develop standards for integrating mediuln-to-hig.h density residential into
existing subdivision developlnent" (Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective C, Action
i tern 2)
The applicant is utilizil1g a COffilTIOn driveway to lneet the street frontage
req.uiremel1ts for two of the pro.posed lots, a COlTIlnO.l1 metllod of getting llig.her
density residel1tiaI projects approved in existillg residential areas or
8U bdi visions.
· "Support a variety of residential categories (low-, rnediuln-, and high.-del1sity
single-fatuily, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, alJaltments,
condolniniums, etc~) for tIle purpose of providing the City witll a range of
affordable housing opportunities." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action
item 10)
City Council is supportive of tIle higher density developlnent proposed for tllis
area. TIle proposed housing type (siIlgle-family attached), provides a greater
variety of housing op.portunities tllan currently exists in this area.
· "Locate high-density d.eveloptnent, where possible, near open space con4idors
or other .pennanent luajor opell space al1d park facilities, Old TaWIl, and near
luajor access tl1orougllfares." (Chapter VII, Goal V, Objective A, Actiol1 itelTI
14)
The subject developluent lies witllin tIle Future Lal1c1 Use Map boundaries of
'Old Town'. The subject site is ap.proxilnately 50G-feet north of Meridian
Elelnentary, whicl1 has open space alld playground facilities. Meridial1 Road, a
lnajor access tllorougllfare, is approxiluately 325-feet to the east
· "Consider "ACCOlTIlnodating Bicycle and Ped.estrian Travel: A Recolnmel1ded
Approacll" froIn. tIle National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all land use
decisions." (Cllapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action itelu 3)
This :publicatiol1 encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway
facilities in 11ew COl1struction and reconstructioll projects, in a lnanner th.at is
safe, accessible and convel1ient. First Street is included in tIle ACHD Five
Year Work ProgralTI to be ilnproved in 2007 with curb, gutter and sidewal.k.
ACHD. is requiring the applicant to road trust for sidewalk on West First
Street abuttillg tIle site. Sidewalk CUITently exists 011 Cllerry Avenue abutting
tIle site.
t''':~
{
~
City COUI1Cil finds that zoning this property to 0- T will be l1alIDonious with and
in accordance witll t]le Comprehensive Plan.
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
If tIle subject reZOlle applicatio.n is approved, City Council does not anticipate that
the applicant intel1ds to rezone the subject property in the future.
c. Is the area included .in the zoning amendment intended to be develo.ped in the
fashion that would be allo\ved under the new zoning - for example, a
residential area turning into conlmercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
In the applicant's submittal letter, it is stated that the su.bject property is intended
to be used for residential purposes. CUITelltly, the 0Illy (principally) pennitted
uses in the O-T zone are single-family homes, libraries, cllurches, and InuseUlns~
All ot11er uses in the 0- T zone, tllat are not prollibited, require separate
Conditional Use Pennit ~pproval. City Council finds that the area included in the
subject z011ing aluendment is planned for develo.pment in a fashion that will be
allowed under tIle new zoning (single-family).
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been lvidened, ne\v
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The gel1eral vicillity of this project is challging rapidly. In this area tl1ere are
several other parcels that have/are/will be convertillg froIn single-family
reside.ntial to lTIulti-fall1ily, office al1d retail COl111uercia] uses. On Chen-y Lane,
betweel1 Meridian Roacl al1d Linder Road, and along Meridian Road in this area,
tl1ere are many sites tllat have cOl1velted to office and cOlnlnercial uses. Altl10ugh
the Inajor arterials in tllis vicil1ity (C11en4Y Lane, Meridian Road, Maill Street)
11ave not been widened recel1tly, iJnprovelnel1ts are expected once the Downto\vn
Tral1sportation Managelnel1t Plan is adopted, im.plelnented al1d funds are available
tlU.OUgl1 ACHD. City Council finds tllat rezonil1g this site to 0- T is consistent
with other land uses and anticipated facility challges in the area.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropl"iate in appearance \vith the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use \-vill not change the
essential character of the same area;
City COUI1Cil finds that tIle proposed 0- T zoning and subsequent single-family
residential llses ..proposed ill the prelimil1ary/final .plat application are consistel1t
(:,~'" '.:'.: :.
with the intended character of the vicinity, as depicted on the Future Lal1d Use
Map~ City Cou.ncil also finds tllat the proposed zoning/uses can be designed and
constructed in a rnamler fIlat will be l1armol1ious with and appropriate in
appearance with the existing and intended character of the surrounding area.
Although there will be an impact of the subject developluellt on tIle existing
character of the area, City Council finds that the ilnpact is consistent with the
i.ntended c11aracter of tIle area; a mix of single-falnily, lTIulti-fatnily and
cOffilnerciaI uses~
F~ Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
If all the conditions outlined in tllis report are com.plied with al1d construction
traffic and house constluction is COllducted in a manner consistent with City
Code, City Council finds that tIle use of this site for four residential dwellings
should not be l1azardous or disturbing to existing or future l1eighboring uses. T.he
Comlnissiol1 aIld Council should rely on public testilnollY (oral or written) to
detennine wllether the pro.posed 0- T zoning wi] I be disturbing or l1azardous to the
neigllboring residential uses.
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drai.nage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
All essential pu.blic facilities and City services listed above currently serve tllis
site. The applicant will be responsible for the extel1sio.11 of utilities for this
proposed developmel1t. Sizil1g al1d routing shall be coord.il1ated witll tIle Public
W orl(s Department. City COUI1Cil finds that tIle current cOl1figuratiol1 of tIle
adjacellt streets and tIle anticipated wide.nillg of Meridiall Road in this area should
be adequate to serve this site into the future.
The applicant alld/or future pro.pel1y OWllers will be required to pay par.k al1d
l1ighway ilnpact fees.
0.11 February 8,2005, ACHD approved tllis developluel1t with site-specific and
standard conditions. Please review tIle ACHD report and cornlnents at the end of
tl1is report for additional infollllation. regarding this fi.nding.
On January 28, 2005, a jOitlt agellcy/depali1nent cormnents lneeting was l1eld witll
represel1tatives of key service providers to tllis propeliy. The Meridian Fire
Department l1as concerns Witl1 serviceability of this site, as fire 11ydrants near tllis
site lnay not be located in accordance with the Illter11ationaI Fire Code (all of tIle
detailed conditions fi-oln tIle Fire Departlnent and otller agencies/departl11ents are
at the el1d of this report). Based on the joint agel1cy/department Ineeting and other
(". .
COlnments received from agencies/deparunents, City Council finds that the public
services listed above can be made available to acconunodate the proposed
developlnent The COlnmission and Council should referel1ce any writtel1 al1d/or
verbal testimony submitted by allY public service .provider, regarding their ability
to adequately service this project.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
If approved, the develo.per will be financing the extension of sewer service, water
service, local street infrastructure, al1d all utilities to serve the project. Other
required site improvelnel1ts will be funded and constructed by tIle developer
tlu.ough the .platting process. TIle .prilnary public costs to serve tIle future residents
will be fire, police and sellool facilities and services. City Council fillds t11at
changing tIle zo.ning of tllis site and allowing four ho.mes to be COllstructed will
not cause excessive additional requirelnents at public cost. City COUllCil also finds
that the rezoning of this site to O-T will not be detrimental to tIle comlTIunity's
economic welfare.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that ,"viII be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general \velfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
City Council finds tl1at the proposed reZOl1e al1d tIle d.evelopluent of single-faluily
.homes on tl1is site will 110t involve uses that will create 11uisal1ces tllat would be
detrhnelltal to tIle general welfare of the surroundil1g area~
ACHD projects tllis developlnel1t will gellerate 18 ad.ditiol1al vehicle trips per day.
City Council recognizes tIle fact that traffic and noise will increase with tIle
approval of this subdivision; 110 wever, City Council does not believe that tIle
alTIOunt generated. will be detriluental to the general welfare of the .public. City
Council does llot anticipate the proposed annexatiol1 and subseq.uel1t uses will
create excessive traffic, lloise, slTIoke, fumes, glare, or odors.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property \vhich shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Three vehicular access points are pro.posed for this development. One driveway is
proposed to West First Street and two driveways are proposed to Chel1.y Avellue.
Both Cherry Avel1ue and West First Street are local roads~ Ifvellicular approaclles
are approved to th.e site tllat are designed and. constructed in accordance with
ACHD policies, City Council finds that tIle approaclles will not create an
/7.-.... .
f.
-~~
interference with traffic on the surro.unding pu.blic streets. Please review any
COIUlnents froIn ACHD for additional il1fonnation regarding this finding.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of maj or importance; and
Any existillg trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed from tllis site should be
luitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinal1ce4 If tIle OIl-site trees are protected and
Initigated for, as required .by the Meridian Parks Departlnent, City Council finds
that tIle proposed developluent will not result in tIle destruction, loss or daluage of
any natural feature(s) oflnajor ilnportal1ce. City Council recommends that the
COllllnission and Council reference any public testimony that Inay be presented to
detennine wllether or not the proposed developlnent may destroy or dalnage a
llatural or scellic feature(s) of major ilnportance ofwl1ich City Council is
una wal.e.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
JVlel"idian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
For tIle reaSOl1S listed in tIle findings above, City COUllCil finds that tIle rezoning
of this property would be in tIle best interest of the City.
~..... .
C. .
EXHIBIT F
Serendipity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Preliminary/Final Plat Findings
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 al1d 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining tIle acceptance of a
proposed subdivisio:n, the COlTIlnissionlCouncil s:hall COl1sider tIle objectives of this title
and at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development
Plan;
City Council finds that the proposed applicatio.n is in substantial cOffi.pliallce with
the adopted COlnprehensive Plan~ (See Rezone Analysis "A" above for more
il1formatiol1. )
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
City Co.uncil finds that pu.blic services are available to aCCOffilTIodate tIle .proposed
develo.p.1nent. (See finding "G" under .Rezone Analysis for .more detaiL)
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Because the develo.per is installing sewer, water, al1d utilities for the developlTI.ent
at their cost, City Coun.cil finds tllat tIle su.bdivision Wil1110t require the
expellditure of capital il11provement funds.
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
City Councilllas relied upon COllllnents fr01TI tIle pu.blic service providers (i.e~ -
police, fire, ACHD, etc.) to detennine tllis finding. (See finding "G" under
Rezone Analysis above, and the Age.ncy COlnme.nts alld Conditiol1S at the el1d of
this report for :m.ore detail.)
E. The other health, safety or environmental.problems that may be brought to
the Commission's attention.
City Council is not aware of any health, safety or ellvirorunental pro.blems
associated witll the develoPlnent of this su.bdivision tl1at sllould be brought to the
Councilor COlTIlnission's attention. ACHD considers road safety issues in their
analysis; ACHD staff has approved tllis su.bdivision, with co.nditions.
C.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
In the matter of a request to Rezone 0.27 acres from R-4 to Q-T (Old Town) AND for
Preliminary/Final Plat approval for four single-family residential lots, by Susan Howard
Case No(s): RZ-04-016, PFP-04-009
For the City Council Hearing Date of: MarcIl 15, 2005
A~ Filldings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
tIle City Council.public hearing, tIle first .publication appearing and written notice
mailed to .property owners or purc:hasers of record within three h.undred feet (300')
of the external bo.undaries of the property. TIle notice of public l1earing before the
City Council was posted upon the property under consideratioll1llore than o:n.e week
before said 11earing. All otller noticin.g was done consistent wit}l Idal10 Code 967-
6509.
The matter was duly considered by the City Council at tIle MarcIl 15, 2005, .public
l1earil1g(s). The applical1t, affected .property owners, and govemlnel1t su.bdivisiol1S
providing services within tIle planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were
given full opportunity to express COlTIlnents and subtuit evidence.
b~ Written. and oral testitTIony was received on tl1i.S Inatter, as reflected in the record.s
of the City Cler.k (for wnttel1 testilTIo.ny) and in the official1neetil1g Ininutes (for
oral testilnony).
c. The Planl1il1g and. Zoning CO.lumission cond.ucted a public l1earing and issu.ed a
written reCOlTIlnendation on the su.bject luatter to tIle City Council.
d. T.he City Councillleard and took oral and written testirTIony and duly considered the
evidence and the record. in this matter.
2.. Process Facts
a. There has been cOlnplial1ce with all notice and hearing requirelnents set fort11 in
Idallo Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~9 11-1.5-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and tIle Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with tIle staff report~
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In. ad.dition to the application and property facts .ooted in the staff report al1d tIle
Planning & Zo.ni11g Recoffiluendation for the su.bject application(s), it is .here.by
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-04-0 16 / PFP-04-009 - PAGE I Of 4
('.:~'.... .
verified that the property owner(s) of record at the tilne of issuallce of these
findil1gs are Mark and Darcy Manwaring~
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a. See Exhibits E and F for the fil1d.ings required for t]lese applications.
B. COl1clusions of Law
1. T.he City of Meridian sllall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land
Use Planl1ing Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.e. 967-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial ll.otice of its Z011ing, Subdivision al1d
Developluent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, al1d all
current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridiall has, by ordinance, established the
Impact Area and tIle A.mend.ed Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6,2002, Resolution No~ 02-382 and Maps4
3. TIle conditio.ns shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Melidian City Code
9 11-17 -9.
4. Due COllsideration llas .beel1 given to the comment(s) received froIn the govermnelltal
subdivisions providing services in tIle City of Meri di all planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the :proposed develoPlnent will 110t
ilnpose expense u.pon the public if the attacl1ed conditiol1S of approval are ilnposed.
6. That the City l1as granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, Wl1ich
sIlalI be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and tllen a copy served by the Clerk upon
the ap.plicant, the Plaruling and Zoning Department, tile Public Works Departlnent and
any affected party requestillg notice.
7. Tl1at this approval is subject to the Legal Descri.ption in :Exhibit A, the Preliminary Plat
dated Decelnber 15, 2004 as shown ill Exhibit B, tIle :Final Plat dated Deceulber 16,
2004 as shown in Exhibit C, and tIle Site S.pecific and Standard Co.nditio:ns in Ex:hibit
D4 The conditions are conclu.ded to be reasol1able and the a.pplicant sllalllneet suetl
requirements as a co.ndition of approval of tIle application.
c. Decisio.n and Order
Purs.uant to the City Council's authority as .provided in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based UpOll the above and foregoil1g Findings of Fact Wl1ich are herein adopted, it is 11ereby
ordered that:
1. TIle applicant's Prelilninary Plat as evidenced .by havin.g suhlnitted the Prelilninary
Plat dated DeceJnbe~ 15, 2004 is hereby conditionally approved;
CITY OF lvlERlDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). RZ-04-0 16 / PFP-04-009 - P AG E 2 Of 4
(:.;.......~
(~~~'..... :
2. The applicant's Pinal Plat as evidenced by having sub.1nitted. the Final Plat dated
Decelu.ber 16, 2004 is l1ereby conditionally approved; and,
3~ The Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibit D.
D~ Notice of Applicable Time Lilnits
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Mo.nth Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that within one year after written a.pproval by the Council, a final plat
shall be filed with the County Recorder; othelwise, such a.pproval shall become null
and void, unless prior to said ex.piratio.n date an extension of time is ap.plied for by tIle
applicant and granted by the COUI1C.i1. The COUI1CiI may authorize an extension 0 the
final plat for a period not to exceed one year froIn the end of tIle original OIle year
period~ (MCC 12-3-8.)
E. Notice of.Fillal Action. al1d :Right to Regulatory Ta.kings Analysis
1. The Applicant is ]lereby 110tified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. SUCl1 request m.ust be in writing, alld lUUst be .filed
with tIle City Clerk not lnore tllan twe.nty-eight (28) days after tIle final decision
concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the
titne period within w.hicll a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of tIle governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuallt to Idallo Code S 67-6521 an affected person being a persoll who has
all interest in real property Wllich Inay .be adversely affected by the issuance or d.e.nial of
tIle co.nditional use pel1nit approvalluay within twenty-eight (28) days after tIle date of
this decision an.d order seek a judicial review as provided by Ch.apter 52, Title 67, Ida.ho
Code.
F. Exllibits
:Exl1ibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved Prelilninary Plat
Exhibit C: Approved Fillal Plat
Exhibit 0: Site Specific and Standard Conditions
Exhibit E; Zonin.g Amendtnent Findings
Exhibit F: Prelilninary/Final Plat Findings
By action of the City Cou.ncil at its regular meeting held on tIle
mil//. cA /' , 2005.
I .-
/.c:,f'~
/ day of
COUNCIL M:EMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
CITY OF M ERI DI AN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AN 0 DEeI Sf ON & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). RZ-04-0 16 / PFP-04-009 - PAGE 3 Of 4
./~ ..
(:
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBE:R CHARLIE :ROUNTREE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAI(ER)
VOTED
-
Attest:
al1d City Attorney.
~
Dated: 4 - J -oS
By: ~
ity Clerk's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSrONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). RZ-04~O 16 I PFP-04-009 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(.
EXHIBIT A
Serendipity Place Subdivision
RZ-04-0 16
Legal Description
RI~-Zf) \~ r..: r)I<S(~j{ll):J~r()N
J7 (~) R
S f~ 1~.t~.N I) [ P 1.1 ~ 'If }) I ; /\ (...~ t< S l) 1~ I) I \.:.IS I (~) f\(
1. t;::l'n.d)~~r l.5: 2.~f}~
~
A Pi\ECLL. ul- LAND LOCATLl.l IN.j Hr, Nf.Hrn-fLAST In (JF SEC.'T"lON 12~ TOVlNSHfP.~ NORTH,
R.ANC.;E i V./LS'L BOISL. ~IFRrnlAN, \H'lUDL\N. Al\\ COl..,i\TY. IflABel, Bl<INfi \toRr
[) /\ 1{ l. [( - f.. ~ J . /\ R f . ).~ t") f ~- Sf ~ [{ ll{ L~: [l I~\ S f~ (". t r . f . (-) \\.~ S :
CO'l\HvfFNCf:'\(j AT THF NOHTHbASl CORNt-:R OF SI',C nON 1:', l...~ N : l{_.: \v.~ B.rYt~ TULNCL
S O(f.'20'3U" L "i04L9h I;f..J~.1 ALON(; lHE. EA.Sl f.INL UF SAID SECTION 12 TO A porNT Af THL
E\TFRSLCTfOI'\ OF N. i\JL.RH.Ht'f\ Snn~..FI AND \V. j\,.L\PJJ-: AVT:NT..lE, THFJ\('F
~ g'F4f)'3(l" \V 316 on FFI.~:T ALONe; .J flL CEN"l"FRrJNE OF \v. ~.L\PLE ,~VENUE. TU i\ POINT AT
.j.liE INlFj~SF{'Tf(}N OF SAID \v. ~\-'f:,\pr..F. r\V~.:.NIJL .ANn \V. FIRST STRFET. TIIE.\JCT.
S OU''20'3.(I'' E-.. 20{IJJf} rl~ll: I" AI JJNU THE CFNTFRLlNL OF \V. FJHST STIH.:FT TO A POINT~ THI-.
REAL POINT ()F BECINNL\(; OF rIflS DFSCl,~IPTION~
lH F.NCF CONlIN! !IN(l S OO"'!2ff30" F l';'lJH) FFJ--""{ ALO:\fi SAID ('fiN I LH l..lNt TO A POf7\:l l'd Ii. II,.
fNTEH.SLJ' nON ()r \'1 FIRS."!" STREET AND \v. Ct--{Fl~ I<Y A VLNt.!L~
TH ENe E S 0Q<">';Pi' .~)'. \V 1 x~~JH) 1'T. L.l r\ L(>Nn t J H'. C EN I Ll{ tIN L or \v. en FRR t.. A v ENFE TO i\
F' f } f !\ rr. ~
lH 1<\<."1'. N (If ('10' .~fr' \V A 1..( H\(j F.>\S. j FR LY HCH.i}"'UA h~ \- OF fRj\~ fvH]{ rnll\ N Sl.' H f)J VISION
t) 7 ~ (H) J: 1.;.1 ~~. r I (") :\ rJ(} IN. r ~
'- '{ )NTIN tf IN(r -'\ I ..f)N( i SA J!., Sl JHI)lV Is It)N HCH; N ! L\ RV . I.' [L F( H..LO\V I Nt.~:
.t. ~ f ~ ~: .\ { ~ f 1. N S ~ r:. 4: · J ~ .. \ j ~. I.. I { J. { H} 11.1 :..1 .I~ . r . r l.) ./ \ I) ( .l t N i" ~
I" I J f :: \ ( ..} ~~ N (i ( r: 2 t~ - ~ f } ~ ~ \ V 2 ~ (H) }: I. ~~ I~: .r. .. j" () ^ F~ ( ) IN. f ~
1. . I..: /~\ \/ i N {j S /\ II } S l) 1 ~ r) I \f I -~ I ( J N I) ( ".) l ~ N l ):~ t, 'l~ r !- i l-.. f ,. ( J f . I : (. ) \ \' 1 Nt. I..
lHFI\CF N ~~)"":."P}'.~5" I,. 17~U)f) FFFT f"() IIJF REAL PfHNT ()F BEGH\NI!\G OJf TillS
[) l_~: S(.: fUI) ..r I(} N ~ (~.() t.~ /r,\ m J N f i {} ..~l J ~..\ (.~ I~ r~:s~ f\.1 (") t{ l.~ ClI< f. f~: ss
., f.l ~. Yrl"" .J) j
\ \, <j" h i'~ ~7;! ./
.......-: tl to I (. i t,;;.1'. p ;
J t-''- f/ $:. i... :.) ,.;
~~?~ ~r.U A t~ PuBLI(~
~j~;n~S fj(PT
: . ... .. .. ..
: . .:...:. ~.. . : : :
~ ~:' '!: ~~)
~.~ r. r: ~ ; ~: . ~ ~ ~
r\
;~i
..~~-::-::.
.~.~ :'h
EXHIBIT B
Serendipity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Approved Preliminary Plat
:- :-..~.~ .V"
" ~"..~d~ .E/'~':i:',
~ ,. ~ ",.,.'J '<~ j <~
:j ~ ~~
" "'~ ;:~..': t .,
-: . NrI U : :;
.: ~::' f: ~:' ~ ~:/~
f' .
. ............ ~.( . . ..... .--..... '. "~"""""""""".".'. .
: .' ;;.. .::::-: :;.
:.:~ t~
:. . ?{i:,~
f
.~::
~.~~~~.
f.:~~~ .
\<.:.: .
^:~:.~ ~.~ -:;.:;. ^:.- ~~^~. ;..... .....:::.~.. .
:~~~ ?;;<>;;. .~.~ ~:::---= -=:. ~:;.:..,-
t.(~;f~fl~~~;~1;~~%~~
. . -: ..~. :-:-..... .. ........ ...... .-.:-. .....
.;..;;..~-:^::. ~:
..'~~:.;:~::.' l.{~~:~~~ ~,:,~"
,~~~ ';~.~
: ::. '.~.~.:... ~ .:...::..~. ~.: . . ~.
, ::;^;~ ~~.:; ;X.;{:: ? .: :, .~ '
';':.::.. -:-:~: ~ .. . ~::=.!=::'^ .
. .-:r.oi..... : .- '~:'.
': ~. :".: ~ :"=. ~ : ~ :" . ~ :- f ~ ::: .'i.:' ~
:. ~. ~ : ~ : . ~ .~ .: '.:: ~ ~ ~-'
: ~.~"tII::S:
r ~:l;~lliD
: .""=....~-- ~___x- :....-: . .....
. ~ ~::.....~. ~ ~ -...:- -.~ ..r:-:- ~~
. .. . ;.~.~~!
(.
......-.v.-.. .
(
EXHIBIT C
Serendi.pity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Approved Final Plat
.....---r ~. . ... ......~......_~_.. ~........ '.. . . '. .. ...... ...... .. . . . .. .. ........-.. . . . .. ... ............... . .. .... ......................................-... .
S [:RE>JDiP iT):"" PL; (~. E
S l~ D D ~ t/ ~ Sl {j ~~:
~
~~'.
...J...~ ~~.~. ~.~
~:~:.:;. :.-r ;~~:.;~ .<'/: .'.: ..,. ':..
:~: ~ 1- 0.~
~? . ~<~
.... ":" .-i..::......; ../....
.:. -.; :.-: -=.: -:-:: ,:", : .-. rI' rI' ..
:-:e- ~
"S" -:-
~ ..
.'.~
..1.
. ~
~
~
: ('.
~; :.:. ~ :: rI'. -.:
':... ...
< ~
~;; ~..;
~ J
~: ~. ~~~ .~:. ~. ~ ~
:. .;.:.
~: ./
:-: . : ~ :-.~..
': ~ =; ~'.:~;: ~ ~~ 2 !- (? ~
::.;~ ~~+-:..:.:~.~~~:'. :'_l~.~~~~tI,~.:~~,~l.~1 ",...:.! .,., t
~! . /. , .. n n .n._ :; ~-".., . '0, ~~; ,;'I . ! >'1
~! . .;~;;'Ddk,~ >!x:s , f~ f>: :
! . .., . .:. ..,.. ,~,' n' : ~ _
, ... ..... _.."n..... --J-, ,_.<:~,. - ,. --- Pni.j"i~~~~~~.~" -+>. _. <~_.-.J
-: ~....-: : .:.'t.........:-: :-" :. -: :.:: ::.... .::-::--...:.-...:.:...... _ . ....: : _:_..
i;. '. ~.:.~..... ~ ~~ ~~'" .... ~ ~ '~:' '.~ -:: :..:. ...."8:~:..~...
: . -:: / -i-"~; ....... "~,.:'" ':^ ~ : ~ -i-:;":" :'. ~ . ~ . ~ .::- .: :.~: ~ : ~ . .
.~ :-::-:: ::~ ~:: ...... ~ .... ':-~:::.~ -. .:..-:. ~
/.~
.... .:;: ~ ;" :-.....=;;..:~~~ .:---:~~~'.~;~ ~..~ ~: ~ .~ ~::? ~ :. :....:.::.: ~.
i : ~:.::j.. .~~/~ ~" .:-..--=.: .~>:; ~:...: ':.::~::~\~:.:- ~~ ~~~. .:. ~~~: ":":. ~.~:
L' G ~~.;~~7X::..;~i'~;:.:~'{".~'\<~2~~;~<~;'~~:>:. >
.. _n -~ ;r:~~.:~~.'L:r~>:+;;..;,{~~<.>>:~~'~. ~:,".::.;>:.
::::.:~';.;. \~" :.: :::.~.'.~~ .~/....>:~~t ~~~ ~~ ~~~:.,:,... .....: .;...: }:
:. ~~ ~ ~~::: :~.:
~...~/.:;~~:"}.~:.~~:'.~~~~' ::~:;.~'='::'....: /~.} \J..... ./.,~ ~ :=<< ~.
U'~.:
::...:~..;: ~:... ..:: .:.~
.'.~ -~~:.~. ......~.~.. . ~; :; ';/~.:-~.~: ~ ~ .:~.... ~:. ~~"".~':..: ': ~: .' :.~< . ~.~.~:
..~~.~.j
~.:~. .; ~.. .~ . ~
~.. ~:..~-------
I ij t~~ ~~
(T~;::~'
~ .. . .. . . .... . . .. ... . ....... ................................ .. . ---"'"-- . ... .
. .. - .-.... ~.. .. . ...r-". . . . .. . ............... . . . ... ....i.,.. . .. . . . ....................-----......................_.. . .'_. . .. .....~.... . . . . . .. ................_. .. ..
!.=
(:..:... :
EXHIBIT D
Serendipity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Site Specific and Standard Conditions
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. All comments of the Rezone (RZ-04-016) ~p.plication shall also be considered
conditions of the Prelilninary/FinaI Plat (PFP-04-009).
2. Utilize a COlnlTIo.n driveway for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. The public street frontage
for Lots 2 and 3 , Block 1, lnay be reduced to 15- feet (31.5- feet .proposed)~ A note
s.hall be placed on the face of tIle final plat restricting fencing, parked cars or any
otIler obstluctiol1 wit]lin the common driveway ease.lnent. Said COITIlTIOn driveway
shall be constructed. a minilTIUlTI of 16-feet wide with crushed gravel and asphaltic
concrete paving, as required by MCC 12-4-14.
3. :Prior to signature of the fi.nal plat by the City Engineer, all structure(s) (excluding
perilneter fencing) on this site shall be reluoved.
1. Underground year rOUl1d pressurized irrigatio.n must be pro'vidcd to all lots \vith.in
this de~~'elopmcnt. The City of ~1eridian requires that pressurized irrigation
s}'stems be supplied by a ~fcar round source of \vater. T.hc ap.plicant shall be
required to utilize any existing surface or Vle]} '[wynter for the priluary source. If a
surface or ~l'vell source is not ~rvailuble, a single point connection to the culir~ary
\vatcr systeln s]laII be rcquircd~ If a single point cOllnectioll is utilized, tIle
dc"/clopcr s11all be res.ponsiblc for the payment of asseSSlncnts for the COlTIlllOn
areas prior to signature on the final plat .b)r th.c City Engineer. In lieu of
providing pressure irrigation service to each lot, the applicant shall be
required to pay a well development fee to the City for each lot.
5. Any tree over 4" in cali.per that is re.lTIoved froIn the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, .being the equivalent nUlnber of caliper il1ches of trees
that were relnoved. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as
replacelnent trees for those trees that are removed (MCC 12-13-13-3)~
6. If pennallent fencing is not provided or is not existing around tIle periln.eter,
telnporary constructiol1 fe.ncing to contaill debris must be installed prior to
issuance of buildin.g permits~ All fel1ces shall taper down to 3 feet tnaXilTIUlTI
witllin 20 feet of all right-of-way~ All fe.ncing shall be installed in accordance with
MCC 12-4-10.
7. Unless otherwise allowed by tIle Meridian Fire Departlnent, provide a .hydral1t at tile
conler of Cheny A ven.ue alld First Street.
f.~. .
t:,.. .
8. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via service Iille extensions froIn tIle
existil1g mains located adjacent to the project. Subdivision design.er to coordinate
lnain sizing and routing with tIle Public Works Department. A.p.plicant shall
execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are
required to provide service. Cover o.ver sanitary sewer Inains shall be no less than
3-feet froln finish grade to tIle to.P of the pipe. If cover is less than 3-feet froln the
sub-grade to the to.P of pipe, alten1ate pipe Inaterials shall be used per the
.Meridian Public Works Deparbnent's Stand.ard Specifications.
9. Do.mestic water service to this site shall. be via service Iil1e exte.nsions from the
existing Inains located. adjacent to the project. Subdivision desigller to coordinate
main sizing and routing with the Public Works Departmel1t Applicant shall
execute City of Meridian standard fonns of easements, for any mains that are
required to provide service.
1 o. The following notes on the plat dated 12/16/04, prepared by Briggs E:ngineering,
Inc., need to be revised or added:
(3.) Remove second se:ntel1ce regarding mlnl1TIUm house sIze (no longer
required on plat).
(11 ~) Illclude "fencing" and "any other obstruction" to the list of tllings
prohibited within tIle common drive ease.ment.
11. Street SigtlS are to be in place, water systelTI s11al1 be approved and activated,
fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base a.pproved by the Ada
COUl1ty High.way District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,
prior to applying for building pennits.
12. All developtnent ilu.proveln.ents, includillg sewer, fencing, Inicro-.paths,
pressurized inigation and lan.dscaping shall be installed and approved .prior to
obtaining certificates of occupancy.
13. A letter of credit or cash surety in tIle aluount of 11 0% will be required for all
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized inigatiol1, sanitary sewer, water, etc.,
prior to signature on the final.plat
14. COlTI.plete the Certificate of Owners and accotnpanying Acknowledgtnent.
15. Coordinate with the Meridian P.ublic Works Departlnent and the Meridian
City/Rural Fire Departlnent to detennine fire flow requirelnel1ts.
16. No variances, exceptions or reductions to the City ado.pted dimensional standards
or uses are approved with this .preIilninary/final plat application~ AlllninimutTI lot
sizes, structure setbacks, alld street frontages sIlall be luaintail1ed.
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(.:
(.~:"-..: :
1. All grading of the site shall be performed in co.nformance with MCC 11-12-3.H.
2. Sidewalks shall be installed 011 the .perimeter of tIle subdivision .pursuant to MCC
12-13-10-8.
3. A letter of credit or casll surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all
fen.cil1g, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., .prior to
signature on the final plat
4. Coordinate fire hydrant .placelnent witll the City of Meridian Public Works
Department.
5. The applicant shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
6. Any existillg dOlnestic wells and/or septic systems within tl1is project willllave to
.be removed from tl1eir dOlnestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and
9-4-8. Wells lnay be used for non-dOlnestic pU1]Joses such as landscape irrigation.
7. Compactiol1 test results must .be subluitted to the Meridian Building Department
for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop
filllnateri.al.
8. The applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plall review,
and construction il1spection fees, as determined during the plan review process,
prior to signature 011 tIle final plat per Resolution 02-374.
9. A.pplicant shall be responsible for ap.plication alld cOlnpliance with any Sectioll
404 Permitting tl1at .may be required by the Arlny Corps of Engineers.
10. Applicant s11all be responsible for application and cOlupliance with and N.PDES
Permitting that lnay be required by the Environlnental Protection Agel1cy.
11. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or tenns of the approved
annexation/col1ditional use does 1l0t relieve the applicatlt of responsibility for
cO:lTI.pliance.
12. Final plat approval shall be subject to the ex.piratiol1 provisions set forth in MCC
12-2-4.
AGENCY COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons :per Ininute
available for duration of 2 110urs to service tIle entire project. Fire l1ydrants shall be
placed an average of 500' apart. International Fire Code A.ppendix C. .Unless
otherwise approved_ .provide a .hydrant at the comer of Cheny Avenue and West
First Street
i
\..
c.. .
2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water
DepartInel1t and water quality by tIle Melidian Water Department for bacteria
testing.
3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Departlnent.
a~ Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 12" outlet face the Inain street or parking lot
aisle.
b~ The Fire l1ydrant shall not face a street whic.h does not have addresses on
it.
c. .Fire hydrant lnarkers sllall be provided per P.ublic Works spec.
d. Locations Wit]l fire hydrants shall have tIle curb painted red 10' to each
side of the h.ydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants sllall be placed on corl1ers when s.pacing pennits.
f. Fire hydrants sIlal} not h.ave any vertical obstructions to outlets witllin 1. 0' ~
g. Fire hydrants sIlall be .placed 18" above finish grade.
4. O.perationaI fire hydrants, telnporary or pennanent street signs and access roads witll
an all weather surface are required before cOlnbustible conshuctiol1 is brougI1t on
si te~
5. Building setbacks s]laII be per th.e International Building Code for one and two story
construction.
6. .Where a portion of th.e facility or buildil1g hereafter constructed or lTIoved into or
within the jurisdiction is lTIOre than 400 feet (122 .In) froin a .hydrant 011 a fire
apparatus access road, as measured by an ap.proved route aroul1d tIle exterior of the
facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains sIlaII .be provided where required
by tlle code official. For buildings equipped througll0Ut witll an approved autolnatic
sp.rinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3~ 1.1 or 903~3.1.2 the
distal1ce requirelnent shall be 600 feet (183).
a~ For Group R-3 and Group U occu.pancies, the distal1ce requirelnent sIla!1 be
600 feet (183 m).
b. .For buildings equipped thrOUgllout with an approved autolnatic sprinkler
system installed in accordal1ce with Sectiol1 903~3.1~1 or 903.3.1.2, the
distance requirelnent shall be 600 feet (183 In).
7. All portions of the buildings located on this project lllUSt be within 150' of a :paved
surface as Ineasured around tIle perimeter of the building.
MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT
1. Stal1dard for Mitigatioll of trees: The standard esta.blished in the City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance will be followed.
(:,...
t.; : .
2. Stal1dard .Plal1 for Protection of Existing Trees during Co.nstruction: The standard
established in the City of Meridian .Landscape Ordinance will be followed.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. No dedication of right-of-way will be required with this application.
2. Relocate any existing irrigation facilities and/or utilities outside of the rigl1t-of-
way~
3. Provide a $3,500 de.posit to the .Public Rights-of-Way Trust FUlld for the cost of
tIle roadway improvements o.n 1 sl Street prior to District approval of a final plat.
4. Construct OIle residential COffilnon d.riveway, 16-feet wide, on West Cl1erry
Ave.nu.e located 63-feet west of tIle east pro.perty lil1e and a second driveway, 9-
feet wide, located 19-feet east of the west property litle as :proposed.
5. Construct one driveway, 20-feet wide, on 1 sl Street located 46-feet 110rth of tIle
edge of pave.ment on W. Cllerry Avenue.
6. Pave the driveways tlleir full width and at least 3D-feet into the site beyond the
edge of pavelnel1t of the roadway and install pavelnent tapers with 15- foot radii
abutting tIle existing roadway edge.
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities s11all be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All .utility relocatioll costs associated with improving street frontages abutting t]le
site s11al1 be borne by the developer.
3. Replace any existi.tlg dalnaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be
damaged d.uring the construction of the proposed developlnent. Contact
Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file nUlnber) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed. unless
approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at
387-6258 (with file nUlnbers) for details.
5. All design and constructio.ll shall be in accordance witl1 tIle Ada County Highway
District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements,
Construction Services procedures al1d all applicable ACHD Ordinal1ces unless
specifically waived 11erein~ All e.ngineer registered ill the State of Idaho shall
prepare and certify all improvement plans.
{-. .
c.
6. The applicant shall subtuit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of
building permit (or otller required permits), Wllich incorporates allY req.uired
design cllanges.
7. Constructio.n, use and property development shall be ill confonnance with all
applicable requirelnents of the Ada County Higllway District prior to District
ap:proval for occu.pancy.
8. Pa)'lnent of applicable road. impact fees are required prior to building construction
in accordance with Ordi.nance #200, also know.n as Ada County Higllway District
Road JIll.pact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the respollsibility of the applicant to verify all existin.g utilities withil1 the
right-of-way. The ap.plical1t at no cost to ACHD sIlall repair existing utiliti.es
damaged by the applicant. The ap.plicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-
800-342-1.585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within
ACHD rigllt-of-way. The ap.plicant shall contact ACH.D Traffic Operations 387-
6190 ill the event any ACHD con.duits (spare or filled) are cOlnproluised durin.g
any pllase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they
are in writing and signed by tIle applicant or tIle applicant's autllon.zed
representative and an autllorized representative of the Ada County Higllway
District. The .burdell shall be upon the applicant to obtain writte.n confil1natiol1 of
allY chal1ge froln the Ada County Higllway District.
11. Any c11ange by tIle applicant in tIle .planl1ed use of tIle property Wl1ich .is the
subject of this ap:plication, shall require the ap.plicant to cOlnply witll all rules,
regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at
tIle tiIne tIle ~pplical1t or its successors ill il1terest advises the Higl1way District of
its intent to c11ange tIle .planl1ed use of tIle subject propelty unless a
waiver/varial1ce of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to
the law -in effect at the tilne the cllange in use is sought.
CENT:RAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
1. This proposal can be a.pproved for central sewage & ce.ntral water after written
approval froIn ~ppropriate entities is sublnitted.
2. TIle Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be subtuitted to an.d
approved .by tIle Idal10 DepartInel1t of Health & Welfare, Division of
Envirorunental Quality.
3. Run-off is not to create a lTIosquito breeding problem.
4. Stonnwater sllaIl be pretreated tllrough a grassy swale prior to discl1arge to tIle
subsurface to prevent ilnpact to groul1dwater alld surface water quality.
(. . .
(<~.....:
5. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall
obtain current best Inal1agement practices for stonnwater disposal and desigll a
sto.rmwater management systelTI that preve.nts grou.ndwater and surface water
degradation.
c
EXHIBIT E
Serendipity Place Subdivision
.RZ-04-0 16
Zoning Amendment Findings
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, Gen.eral Standards Applicable to ZOlling
Amendlnents, .both the P&Z Comluissiol1 and Council are required "to review the
particular facts and circumstallces of each proposed zoning aluendment in tenus of the
followil1g standards and sIlaII find adequate evidence answering the following questions
about the proposed zo.nin.g alnendlnent"
TIle following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis .by City Council:
A. Will the ne\v zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
The 2002 COlTI.prehellsive Plan Future Land Use Map desigl1ates the subject
pro.perty as "Old Town". In Chapter VII of the COlnprehensive Plan, Old Town
uses will include a variety of residel1tial uses .il1Cludillg reuse of existing buildin.gs
for residential uses, new construction of lTIulti-family residential over grout1d
floor retail or office .uses. Furt.her, the purpose of the req.u.ested 0- T district is to
accomlnodate and encourage further expansion of the 11istorical core of tIle
cOln.mu.nity; to delin.eate a ce.ntralized activity center and to encourage its renewal,
revitalization alld growth as the public, quasi-.public, cultural, financial al1d
recreational center of the City~ A variety of theses uses integrated with general
business, Inedium-lligll to high density residential, and other related uses is
encouraged in all effort to .provid.e tIle appro.priate mix of activities necessary to
estab.lisl1 a truly urban City center (MCC 11-7-2.L). City Council finds tllat tIle
requ.ested Q-T ZOllil1g generally conforms to the stated pu~pose and intent of tIle
Old Town designation within .MCC and the COlTI.prehel1sive Plan~ In additiol1, in
the applicant's cover letter several COlnprellensive Plan policies are listed, Wl1ich
S"upport the rezone and proposed residential use of the .property.
City Council finds the foIlowin.g Goals, Objectives, and Acti.on itelTIS COlltained in
the 2002 COlTI.prehellsive Plan to .be applicable to this application:
· "Ellcourage intil1 development in. vacant/underdeveloped areas within tIle City
over fringe area development to halt tIle outward :progression of urban
development~" (Cllapter V, Goal I, Objective A~3)
This is an intill parcel that is currently receiving city services. Redeveloplnellt
of this :parcel will allow for additional llousing units close to establislled
schools, cOlnmercial services, and the downtown core~
(
c.
· "Promote and strellgtl1en hig.h density residential development in and around
downtown" (Chapter V, Goal II, Objective A, Action iteln 5)
City Council is su.pportive of the proposed :h.igller density residel1tial
developlnent in downtown.
· "Develop standards for integrating Inediuln-to-lligl1 del1sity residel1tial into
existil1g subdivision developluent" (Cha.pter VII, Goal I, Objective C, Action
itelll 2)
The applicant is utilizing a COllUTIOl1 driveway to meet the street frontage
requirelnel1ts for two of the proposed lots, a COffilTIOn method of getting higher
density residential projects approved in existing residential areas or
subdivisions~
· "Support a variety of residential catego.nes (Iow-, mediuln-, and high-density
single-family, m.ulti-family, townllouses, duplexes, apartlnents,
condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of
afford.able housing opportunities." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action
itelTI 1 0)
City Council is S"upportive of the higher density develo.ptuent :proposed for tllis
area. The proposed ho.using type (single-family attaclled), provides a greater
variety ofllousing op.portunities than currently exists in this area.
· "Locate hig.h-density development~ where possible, near open space corridors
or other pennallel1t Inajor opell space and park facilities, Old Town, al1d near
.major access tlloroughfares." (Chapter VII, Goal V, Objective A, Action itelTI
14)
The subject developlll.ent lies within the Future Land Use Map boundaties of
'Old Tow.n'. The subject site is ap.proxitnately 500-feet north of Meridian
Elelnentary, Wllich.llas o:pen space and playgrou.nd facilities. Meridian Road, a
.major access thoroug.hfare, is approxilnately 325-feet to the east.
· "Consider "ACCOlTIlTIodating :Bicycle and :Pedestrian Travel: A Recomlnel1ded
Approacll" frOll1 the .N ational Center for Bicycling and Walking in all land use
decisions." (Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action itelll 3)
This publication ellcourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway
facilities in new constructiol1 and reconstructioll projects, in a Inalmer that is
safe, accessible and convenient. First Street :is included in the ACHD Five
Year Work Program to be improved in 2007 wit]1 curb, gutter and sidewalk~
ACH.D is requiting the applicant to road trust for sidewalk on West First
Street abuttil1g tile site. Sidewalk currel1tly exists on Cherry Avenue abutting
tIle site~
(r ....
City Council finds that zOlling this property to 0- T will be harmonious witll and
in accordance with the Comprellensive Plan.
B.. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
If the subject rezone application is ap.proved, City COUI1Cil does not anticipate that
the applicant intends to rezone the subject property in. tIle future.
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning - for example, a
residential area turning into commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
In the applicant's s.ublnittalletter, it is stated that the subject property is intel1ded
to .be used for residential purposes. CUITently, the only (principally) penn.itted
uses in the O-T zone are single-family 1101nes, libraries, churches, and In.useums.
All otller uses in the 0- T Z011e, tllat are not prollibited, require separate
Conditional Use .Permit approval. City Council finds tllat the area included in. tIle
subject zoning amelldment is plalUled for developtnent in a fasllion that will be
allowed und.er the new zoning (si.ngle-falnily).
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
TIle gel1eraI vicinity of t11is :project is cllanging rapidly. III this area tllere are
several otller parcels that have/are/will be converting troIn sil1g1e-family
residential to lTIulti-falnily, office al1d retail cOlnlnercial uses. On Cllerry Lane,
between Meridian Road and :Linder Road, and alon.g Meridian Road in this area,
there are Inany s-ites that have cOIlverted to office and cOffilnercial uses. Although
the Inajor arterials in tl1is vicinity (Cllerry Lal1e, Meridian Road, Main. Street)
have not beell widened recel1tly, ilnprovelnents are expected once the Downtown
Tral1sportation Managelnent Plan is ado:pted, ilnplemented and funds are available
through ACHD. City Council fil1ds tllat rezoning this site to 0- T is consistent
with other land uses a.nd anticipated facility changes in tIle area.
E.. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appro.priate in appearance with. the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
City COUI1Cil finds that tIle proposed 0- T zOlling and subsequent single-fatuily
residential uses proposed in the .preliluinary/fillal plat a.pplication are consistent
{;o
\ho 0
(':."..:.: . ..: .
with the intended character of the vicinity, as depicted on tl1e Future Land U.se
Map. City Co.uncil also finds that the proposed zoning/uses can be designed and
constructed in a manner that will be harmonious with and. appropriate in
appearance with the existing and intended character of the surrounding area.
Although there will be an ilnpact of the subject developlnent on the existing
character of the area, City Council. finds that tIle impact is consistent with the
intended cllaracter of the area; a .mix of single-falnily, rnulti-falnily and
cO.ffilnercial.uses.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
If all tIle conditions outlined in this report are cOluplied with and construction
traffic and house construction is conducted. ill a manl1er consistent witll City
Code, City Co.uncil finds that the use of this site for fo.ur residential dwellings
should not be l1azardous or disturbing to existing or future neigl1boring uses. TIle
COlTIIUission and Council sh.ould rely on .public testimo.ny (ora] or written) to
deterlnine whether the proposed 0- T zoning will be disturbing or hazardous to the
neighboling reside.ntial uses.
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as high\vays, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, selver or that the person responsible for the
establishment of .proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such serv.ices;
All essential public facilities and City services listed above currently serve this
site. T.he applica.nt will be responsible for tIle extension of utilities for this
proposed develo.pment. Sizing and routil1g shall be coordillated with the Public
.Works Departlnel1t. City COUI1Cil finds tllat tIle current configuration of tIle
adjacent streets alld tIle anticipated widel1ing of Meridian. Road in this area should
be adequate to serve tllis site into the future.
The applicant and/or future :property owners will be required to pay park and
.higllway iln.pact fees.
On Fe.bruary 8,2005, ACHD approved this developlnent with site-specific and
standard conditions. Please review tIle ACHD report and comments at the end of
this report for additio.nal informatioll regarding tllis fil1dil1g.
011 January 28, 2005, a joint agency/departlnellt conunel1ts meeting was held Witll
representatives of key service providers to this property. The Meridian Fire
:Department has concerns with serviceability of this site, as fire hydrants l1ear this
site Inay not be located ill accordance with the Intelnatiol1al Fire Code (all of tIle
detailed conditions from the Fire Departlnent al1d otller agencies/depamnents are
at the end of this report). Based on the joint agency/departm.ent meeting and otller
/~. ..
t- .....
co:rn.ments received from agencies/departme.nts, City Council finds that tIle public
services listed above can be made available to aCCOffilTIodate tIle .proposed
developtnent. The Conunission and Council s110uld reference any written and/or
verbal testilTIOny sub.mitted .by any .public service provid.er, regarding their ability
to adequately service this proj eet.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detr.imental to the economic welfare of
the community;
If approved, the developer will be final1cing tIle extension of sewer service, water
service, local street infrastructure, and all utilities to serve the project Other
required site itnprovements will be funded and constructed by the develo.per
tlrrougll tIle platting process. The .primary .p.ublic costs to serve the future residents
will be fire, .police and school facilities and services. City Council finds that
changing the z011ing of this site and allowing four llolnes to be constructed will
.not cause excessive additional requirelnents at public cost. City Council also finds
that tIle rezoning of this site to O-T will not be detrilnental to the community's
econolnic welfare.
.I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activit.ies, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive .production of
traffic, .noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
City Council finds that the proposed rezone and the development of sillgle-falnily
1101nes on this site willllot involve uses that will create nuisances that would be
detri.m.elltal to tIle general welfare of the surroundillg area.
ACHD projects this d.evelopluent will gellerate 18 additio:nal vehicle trips per day.
City Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase Wit!l the
approval of tllis subdivision; 11owever, City COUI1Cil does not believe that the
alTIOunt generated will .be detritnental to the general welfare of tIle :public. City
Council does not anticipate the pro:posed annexat.ion and subsequel1t uses will
create excessive traffic, noise, slTIoke, fulnes, glare, or odors.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference \vith traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Three vehicular access points are proposed for tl1is develo.pment. One driveway is
pro.posed to West First Street and two driveways are proposed to Cherry Avenue.
Both Cherry Avenue and West .First Street are local roads~ Ifvehicular approaches
are ap.proved to the site that are designed and COllstructed in accordance with
ACHD policies, City Council finds that the approaches will not create an
( ..
(~..~... ,
interference with traffic on the surrounding pu.blic streets~ Please review any
CO:ln.1nents froln ACHD for additional il1formation regarding this fil1ding~
K.. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are relTIoved from this site should be
Initigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. If tIle on-site trees are protected al1d
.luitigated for, as required by the Meridian Parks Department, City COUI1CiI finds
that tIle proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or dalnage of
any natural feature(s) of.major ilnportance. City Council reco:mlnends that the
Comlnission and Council reference any public testimony that Inay be presented to
detennine whether or not the proposed develo:pment Inay destroy or dalnage a
.natural or scenic feature(s) ofluajor ilTI.portance of which City Co.uncil is
unaware.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
For the reasons listed in tIle findings above, City Council finds that the rezonil1g
of this pro.pertv wo.uld be in tIle best interest of the CitV4
(~,.::...::
EXHIBIT F
Serendipity Place Subdivision
PFP-04-009
Preliminary/Final Plat Findings
Sections 12-3-3 J~2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determilling tIle acceptance of a
proposed subdivision, the COlnmission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title
and at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivision \vith the Comprehensive Development
Plan;
City Council finds that the proposed application is in substantial compliance with
the adopted COluprehensive Plan. (See Rezo.ne Analysis "A" above for lTIOre
information. )
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
City Council fil1ds that public services are available to aCCOlTIlTIodate the pro.posed
developlnent. (See finding "G" .under Rezone Analysis for lTIOre detaiL)
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the c3.pital improvement
program;
Because tIle developer is installing sewer, water, and utilities for the develo.pment
at tlleir cost, City Council fillds that the subdivision will not require the
expenditure of capital itnprovement funds~
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
City Councilllas relied upon COlnments froln tIle public service providers (i.e. -
police, fire, ACHD, etc.) to detertnine this finding. (See finding "G" ul1der
ReZOl1e Analysis above, and the Age.ncy COlTIlne11ts an.d Conditions at the e.nd of
this report for more detail.)
E. The other health, safety or environ.mental problems that may be brought to
the Commission's attention.
City Council is 110t aware of any health, safety or environluental problelTIS
associated witl1 tIle develo.Plnent of this subdivision that should .be brought to tIle
Councilor COlnlnission's attel1t:i.on. ACHD considers road safety issues in their
analysis; ACH.D staffhas approved tl1is su.bdivisio.n, with conditio.ns~
;
J
(:
('
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLU.SIONS OF LA WAND
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of a Request to Amend the Preliminary Plat for Phases 7 & 10 of Saguaro
Canyon Subdivision (PP-03-032) consisting of 21 single family residential building lots on
approximately 6 acres in a .R-4 zone by Far West, LLC.
Case No. PP-05-001
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 15, 2005
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a~ A notice of a .public .healing was pu.blislled for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the City Council p.ublic hearing, tIle first publicatio.n appear.ing and written notice
Inailed to property owners or purcllasers of record. within three .hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of tIle property. The 110tice of public hearing before tIle
City Co.unci] was posted upon th.e property utlder consideration Inore than one week
before said l1earing. All otller noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code ~67-
6509.
The luatters were duly considered by the City Council at tIle March 15, 2005, pu.hlic
hearing. The applicant, affected property OWl1ers, and government subdivisions
providing services withil1 the .planningjurisdictio.n of the City of Meridian were
given full opportunity to express CO"lTIlnents and sublnit evidence.
.b~ Written and oral testimony was received on this Inatter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the officiallneeting Ininutes (for
oral testimony).
c. The PlaMing and Zoning COlTIlUission co.ndu.cted a .public hearing and issued a
recoffilnendation for approval to City CounciL
d~ The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered the
evidence and. tIle record in. this Inatter.
2. Process Facts
a~ There has bee.ll cOill.pliance witll all notice and l1earing requirelnents set fort], in
Idaho Code g67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~~ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidel1ced by the Affidavit of Mailillg, and tIle Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with tIle staff report
3. Application and Pro:pel1y :Facts
8. In addition to the a.pplication and property facts noted in the staffreport and the
PlalUling & Zoning Recolnmendatiol1 for the subject application(s), it .is hereby
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIO.N & ORDER
CASE NO. PP-OS-OO 1 - PAGE 1 O"r 4
(.
verified that the property owner of record at the time of issuance of these findings is
Far West, LLC.
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances
a. See Exhibit D for the findings required for the Prelilninary Plat application.
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it .by the "Local.Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, ldallo Code (.I~C. ~67-
6503)~
2. TIle Meridian City Council talces judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
:Oevelopment Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zo:ning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordil1ance, established tIle
TIn.pact Area and the Amel1ded COlnprehensive Pla.n of the City of Meridian, w.hich was
adopted August 6,2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. T.he conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code
S 11-17 -9.
4. .Due consideration has been give.n to tIle comment(s) received fro:m the govemlnentaI
subdivisions providil1g services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is fo.und public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expel1se upo.n tl1e public if the attached con.ditiollS of approval are imposed.
6. That the City lIas granted an order of approval in accordance witll this Decisiol1, wl1ich
sllall be signed by the .Mayor al1d City Cler:k and tllen a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, tIle Planning and Zoning Departlnent, tIle Public Works Departlnent and
any affected party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to tIle Legal Description in. Exllibit A, tIle Preliminary Plat
dated January 4,2005 as shown in Exhibit B, and the Conditions of Approval ill.Exhibit
C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant sllallll1eet such
requirements as a condition of approval of the application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact w.hic.h are hereil1 adopted, it is hereby
ord.ered that:
1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced by l1aving submitted the Prelim.il1ary Plat
dated Jan.uary 4, 2005 is hereby conditionally ap.proved;
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO. PP-OS-OO I - PAGE 2 Of 4
(. .
~~~"".." ""
j" ""
\.
2. The site specific and stand.ard conditions of approval are as shown in Exhibit C.
D. Notice of.Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby 110tified that pursuant to Ida.ho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis~ Such request l11USt be in writing, and .must be filed
with the City Clerk not lnore than twenty-eight (28) days after tIle final decision
concerning the matter at issue~ A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the
titne period withil1 Wllicll a Petition for Judicial Review Inay be filed.
2. Please take notice that tllis is a final action of tIle govenlil1g body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected person being a perSOll who has
an interest in real property which Inay .be adversely affected by tIle issuance or denial of
the approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order
seek a Judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idallo Code.
E~ Exhibits
Exhibit A: .Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved Preliminary .Plat (1-04-05, wit]] conditions)
Exhibit C: Preliminary Plat Conditio.us of Approval (all agellcies)
Ex.hibit 0: Preliminary Plat Findings
By actiO!l of tIle City Council at its regular meeting held on tIle
Itl/Vl (//J-; ,~ ZPt1?G:
/51'6- day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL VOTED
CO.UNCIL M.EMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED
(TIE BREAKER)
CITY OF MERIDIAN F.INDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF L AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE N04 PP-OS-OO 1 - P AG E 3 Of 4
/~.r........
l<.:...... .
(n .
Attest:
M~~~~~~~,~~ eerd
;/ .". ~r~' ...,
I -0 ',.
~ ~
~ ~
I ~
and City Attorney.
:Oated: 4-)-05
By: . lJLQ)U
CIty Clerk's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FrNDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE N04 PP-OS-OO 1 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(.
\
EXHIBIT A
Saguaro Amended
PP-05-001
Legal Description
.. -:: ~.~ . . d ..
DE.SCRfPTIOii
fOR
6 ACRE. PAf~CEL
[)f1.r~emoor- 9 ~ 2i)[14
A PARCEL OF Lt.1ND lOCATED tN THE 'IV 1/2 OF SEOTION 30~ TOVVNSHIP 4-
NUfffHt RL\NGE i.EAST OF.THE S01SE MFRfDIAN. A.DA COUNlY~ IDAHO.
fAOR5 PARYfJCULARL \~ DESCRf8ED AS FOLLOvVS.~
COM~JENCiNG AT THE VvEST 1/4 CORNER Or SECTJ.O.N .30~ TAN~J R, "if.:.-:
8Jvl.~ THE ~~Al POiNT o~ BEGINNfNG.O~ THiS DES,CRrPTjON~
(THENCE s. Bgo53~3.61J E 1098.69 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF TrlE SF 1/4
OF THE N1JV 114 OF SA1D SECTIClN 30:
THENCE.. N OO~29~4;r E 445.81 FEET ALO.NG THE weST LINE OF THE SE 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4 OF SAiD SECTION 30 TO A POINT;
THENCF. S 89~52~26~ E 640.01 FEET TO ^ POlN1 ~
.'rHENCE s Ooo29~44" i^J 4.45~46 .FEt=~r .re) A PQtNT ON THf SOlJT!--~ LINE.OF
THE SE 1i4 OF THE N\!IJ 114 OF SAID SFCTlor4.30;
THEt~CE N 89~54~41 t~. W 343~ i 0 FEE1J ALOptG THE SAID SOUTH .LINE TCl A
POINT; .
THENCE S OO~05-~1r; W 24.0l\ F.EET TO " POlNT;
Tr~Er~CE pJ SQ.c54j41 h lit! 197:08 FEFT TO A POiNT:
THENCE N .B~.~53136!} \'AJ 1098,64 FEET TO A ?OJNT ON THE WEST LINE OF
SAIL1 SLCffON .$0;
THENCE N OO~23~33'~ E 24.00 P.EET ALONG SAfD VltE:~n LINt TO THE RSAL
~OINT~Qf E1EGU\ft4INt! OF THIS DESCRtPTION;
~J:A Y N E: l(~ BARBER
P ~l~tSA 8444
3{rj 12 ./D.hC ~cl~~
Saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OO.I
page 1 Of 1
.J:~ M . .~. .. ::~ ; t:....}
A f I
~~~ r t ~
~ ~! ~:
~
j ~ ?
~:n J ~
(;j(2
K~ b
Ll
1
;. ..
.~-:
f . . .:....... .1
:~r ~ '~
:.'; ;1 ~ ! ~ ~
? .~~;=I~
J . ~ ~. . t.... ~ )-
f<~I( /; ~ ~
... c ~.
I: '~f .~
~. .r. :
.: :-
] J ~ ; ~) J
· ,.. (. ;ll ~
j r ! : r, ~t f f
[I ~. .j ~
. . J } .'
~ ~~ ~:! ~
i j i i i
I.! !
i
~
Saguaro Amended ~ .PP-OS-OOl
page 1 Of 1
\,
/.........:....
{,
EXHIBIT B
Saguaro Amended
PP-OS-OOl
Approved Preliminary .Plat
;'}
) ~
.J .
:.: ;:..
j:
f.r
t.J
j
~.~
: ~ ....~ :") t.
I j' ~. ~ 1 ~ , : II.; 'I
ffdpn'..QI<'f.I~L~ :;-<~
!d:d J;II:I ,! ~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ '\' i i ~ 11 f ~ t i i ; ~ ~ } ~ j i ill ~~
~nl:ndp..;i I~~ i~~; i.~q
~ I {":l; i ~ ~l i ' ~It
f ~q I ~ ~ Hj
i;
?;2
::": : ~:.
~ t~
~. :.':' !:7"......
c............
EXHIBIT C
Saguaro Amended
PP-05-001
Conditions of Approval
SITE SP:ECIFIC CONDITIONS (PRELIMINARY PLAT)
1. This Alnended Prelilninary Plat s]lall be subject to all applicable conditions of
approval froIn Saguaro Canyon Subdivisio.n (AZ-O-027, PP-03-032, and CUP-03-
058).
2. This preliminary plat shall cOlnply with Item No.8, .Page 8, of the recorded
Development Agreement for Saguaro Canyon Subdivision regarding removal of the
24- foot flag lot extending to Meridian Road.
3. The time requirelnents for final .platting of the subject pro.perty will follow tIle
phasil1g plan of the original approval of Saguaro Canyon Su.bdivision.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation lnust be provided to all lots within this
develoPluent The City of Meridian requires that pressur.ized ini.gatio.n systems be
supplied by a year-rou.nd source of water. Th.e applicant s11all be requjred to utilize
any existil1g surface or well water for the priluary source. If a surface or well source
is not availa.ble, a sillgle-point cOl1nection to the culinary water system s11alI be
required. If a single-point connectiol1 is utilized, the develo.per shall be responsible for
the paytnent of asseSSlnents for the COlTIlnOn areas prior to signature on the final .plat
by the City El1gil1eer.
2. Any tree over 4" in caliper tIlat is relTIoved from the property s.halI be replaced by
instaIlil1g additional trees, being the equivalellt number of caliper inches of trees that
were removed. Required. landscaping trees will not be co.nsidered as replacelnent trees
for those trees that are removed.
3. All in-igation ditches, laterals or callaIs, exclusive of natural watelWays, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled
per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to .be approved by the ap.pro.priate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditc.h owners), with written
ap.proval or non-approval sublnitted to tIle Public Warks De.partlne.nt. If lateral users
association approval can not be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by tIle
City Engin.eer prior to final plat signature.
4. Any existillg dOlllestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within this project will have to be
removed frOlTI their dOluestic service, per City Ordi11ance Section 5-7-5 I 7. Wells
may be used for no.n-dolnestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
Saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OOl
page 1 of4
{.: .
c. ....
"\
f(: : .
t,:.. ...... .
5. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) m.ust be designed to ensure t.hat water
will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all
stonns up to and including a 1 DO-year storm eve.nt~ Side slopes within drainage areas
shall not exceed 3: 1. The project engineer should :pay close attention to the results of
field studies determinil1g the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the
design and construction phases.
6. Coordinate fire llydrant .placelnent with the City of Meridian Public Works
:Oepartment.
7. Streetlights will be required at locations d.esignated by tIle Pu.blic Works Department.
All streetligllts sllall be installed at tIle expense of the A.pplicant. Typical locations
are at street intersections and/or fire l1ydrants.
8. Developer shall coordinate :lnailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
9. All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with MCC 12-5-2~K. Prior to
sign.ature of tIle final plat(s), all sidewalks shall be constru.cted or a final1cial
guarantee that said improvements will be completed shall be provided
10. A note shall be placed on tIle final plat stating that unless otherwise approved, all
b.uilding setbacks s.hal} meet the requirelnents of the zoning ordil1ance in effect at tIle
time of building pennit subtnittal.
11 ~ A letter of credit or cas.h surety ill the amount of 110% will be required for all
landscapil1g, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etcK, prior to signature of
the final plat.
12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Worl{s developlnent plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as detennined during the plan review .process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution. 02-374.
13. Plat approval shall be subject to the expiration :provisions set forth. in MCC.
14. Staffs failure to cite s.pecific ordillance provisions or te.nus of tIle ap.proved
preliminary .plat, conditional use pennit or develo.plnel1t agreement does not relieve
Applicant of responsibility for cOlnpliance.
OTHER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per luinute
available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire l1ydrants shall be
placed an average of 500' apart. International Fire Code Appendix C
Saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OO I
.Page 2 Of 4
("
j"
t
2~ Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Me.ridian .Fire
Departlnent alld water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria
testing.
3. Final Approval of tIle fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
a. :Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 YZ" outlet face the lTI.ain street or .parking lot
aisle~
b~ The Fire hydrant shall not face a street whicI1 does not have ad.dresses 0.0
it.
c~ Fire hydrallt lnarkers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d. Locat.ions with fire hydrants shall have tile curb painted red 10' to each
side of the hydrant location.
e. Fire Hydral1ts shall be placed on corners when spacing :pennits.
f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical o.bstructions to outlets within 10'.
g. Fire l1ydral1ts shall be place 18" above finisll grade.
h~ Fire l1ydrants sllal! be provided to meet the requiremel1ts of the IFC
Section 509.5.
4. Tlle phasing plan may require that allY roadway greater than 150' in length that is
not provided witll all outlet s.halI be required to have an approved turn aro.und.
5. All entrance and intenlal roads s.hall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
6. Operational fire hydrants, te.mporary or pennallent street signs and access roads with
an all weather surface are required before co.mbustible construction is brought on
si te.
7. To increase emergency access to tIle site a IninilTIUm of two .points of access will be
required for any portion of tIle project, which serves lTIOre t11an 50 ho:mes. Tile
applicant shaH .provide a stub street to tIle propel1y to the (west/eastlnorthlsoutll).
The two entrances should be separated .by 110 less tllan Y2 tIle diagonaltueasurelnent
of the .project.
8. The roadways shall be .built to Ada County Higl1way Standards and shall have a
clear driving surface, available at all tilnes, whicl1 is 20' wide~ Streets witll less
tl1al1 a 29' street width shall have no parking~ Streets with less tllan 33' shall have
parkillg only on one side. Tllese Ineasurelnents shall be based 011 the back of curb
dilnension.
9. The proposed 21-lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household
would .have a total estimated population of 61 residents at build out
10. The fire departlnel1t requests that any future signal:izatio.n il1staIled as the result of
tIle develo.plnent of this project .be equipped with Opticoln Sensors to ensure a
Saguaro Amended ~ PP-OS-OOl
page 3 Of 4
li~ .
\.~::.~~.: . . .
safe and efficient res.ponse by fire and emergency medical service ve.hicles. This
cost of this installatiol1 is to be borne by the developer~
11. Wllere a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or lTIoved into or
within the jurisdiction is JTIore tllan 400 feet (122 m) fr01TI. a hydrant on a fire
apparatus access road, as Ineasured by an approved route around tIle exterior of the
facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and Inains shall be .provided where required
by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an. approved autolnatic
sprinlder system installed in accordance with Sectiol1 903.3.1.1 or 903~3.1.2 the
distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Group R-3 and. Group U occupancies, the distance requirelnent sllall be
600 feet (183 In).
b. For builditlgS equi.pped thrOUgllout with an approved automatic sprinkler
systelll installed ill accordance with Section 903~3.1.1 or 903.3.1 ~2, the
distance requirelnent shall be 600 feet (183 In).
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY COMMENTS
1. sse l1as no COlnments related to this application.
POLICE DEPARTMENT COM.MENTS
1. The Police Departln.ellt has no COl1cems related to the site design submitted with the
ap.p Iication.
M:ERIDIAN :PARKS DEPARTMENT COMM.ENTS
]. T.he Parks Departlnent llas no concerns with the site design as subluitted witl1 the
application.
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
1. After written approvals froIn appropriate e.ntities are sublnitted we can ap.prove this
proposal for central sewage and central water.
2. The followillg plans Inust be sublnitted and approved by the Idallo Departlnent of
Healtll and Welfare: central sewage and central water.
3 ~ Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem~
4. TIle engineers and architects involved with the design of tIle subject project sllall
obtain current best Inanagement practices for stonnwater disposal and design a
stonnwater Inal1age.ment s.ystetTI that prevents groundwater and surface water
degradation~
Saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OO 1
page 4 of4
(.. ..
=-.... :
~.:-:- ..
f.: ..:. ~: . ~
(.~::. :
EXHIBIT D
Saguaro Amended
PP-05-001
Required Findings
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS
Meridian City Code (MCC) 12-3-3 J~2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In detennining the
acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the COlumission/Council shall consider the
objectives of this title al1d at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivis.ion with the Comprehensive Development
Plan;
City Council finds that tIle 2002 Com.prellensive Plall Future Land Use Map
designates all of the subject prope.rty as "Mediu"ln Density Residential", which
allows for densities of tlu.ee to eight units .per acre. (See Chapter VII, pg. 99.)
Council finds that the pro:posed subdivision is ill compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
City Council finds that the majority of public services are available to
accolumodate the pro.posed developlnent but sanitary sewer and fire are not
available for the lots at this tilne. The Nortll Slougl1 Trunk, whic11 will serve the
su.bdivision, is scheduled to be extended in 2005. In tenus of fire service, it's
anticipated that tIle second, permanent access for tIle subdivisiol1 (besides
McMillan Road.) will be provided through a l1ew residential subdi vision on the
Ascllen.brenner property, north of the sellool site and west of tIle subject property.
To date, tl1e City has not received an application or conducted a pre-ap.plication
tueeting 011 this property~ The approved prelinlinary plat for Saguaro Canyon
Subdivision. restricted developluent of tIle neigl1borhood Ul1til required services
are available, and tllose conditions apply to tIlis alnended preliluinary plat as well.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
City Co.uncil finds that the proposed subdivision would not create any lTIOre
additional requirelnents or delnands to tIle City th.an tIle previousl y approved
residential uses. The prilnary question is one oftilning. Until the North Slougl1
Trunk is co.nstru.cted, sanitary sewer service is not available for this developrTI.ent.
saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OOl
I:!
~
~\:
..- ......-.-..
/
{
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Any additional expenditure for supporting services was caused by tIle approval of
tIle original 432-10t prelilninary plat for the property. The priluary public costs to
serve the future site will be fire and police services. City Council fi.nds that this
development will not cause excessive additional requirelnents at public cost, if the
applicant complies with the conditions of ~p.proval for tIle ap.proved prelilninary
:plat application.
E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to
the Commission'8 attention.
Other than previously 11oted, City Council does not find any other health, safety or
environlnental problems associated with. this subdivision that need to be brought
to the Councilor Com.mission' s attentio.n.
saguaro Amended - PP-OS-OO:I
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of a request for a Conditional Use Permit for two new Office/Retail Buildings
.in a I-L Zone, by DBSI Realty
Case No(s): CUP-04-055
For the City Council Hearing Date of: MarcIl 15, 2005
A. Filldings of Fact
1. H earil1g Facts
a. A notice of a public 11earing was published. for two (2) conseeutive weeks prior to
tIle City Council.public hearil1g, the first publication appearing and. written :notice
mailed to .property owners or purcl1asers of record within three .hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the property~ The 110tice of public hearing before the
City Council was posted u.pon the .property under consideration Inore tllan one week
before said hearil1g. All other noticil1g was don.e consistent with Idaho Code ~67-
6509~
The matter was duly considered by tIle City Council at the February 22,2005,
public hearing(s). The applicant, affected property owners, and government
subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of
Meridian were given full op.portunity to express comments and submit evidel1ce.
b~ Written and oral testilTIOllY was received o.n tllis Inatter, as reflected in tJle records
ofth.e City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the official lneeting luinutes (for
oral testilTIOl1Y).
c. The Plalming and Zoning COlmnission conducted a pu.blic l1earin.g and issued a
written recommendation 011 the subject matter to tile City Council~
d. TIle City Council heard a.nd took oral and written testimony and duly COl1sidered tIle
evidel1ce and the record in this Inatter.
2. Process Facts
a~ There l1as been cOlnpliance with all 110tice and hearing requirelne.nts set forth in
Idaho Code ~67 -6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~ ~ 11-15-5 and 11-.1 7 -5 as
evidel1ced by tIle Affidavit of Maili.ng, and tIle Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
POStil1g filed with. tIle staff report.
3. A.p:pIicatiol1 al1d Property Facts
a. In addition to the applicatiol1 and property facts noted in the staffreport and the
Pla1111ing & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND .DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). CUP-04-055 - PAGE 1 Of 4
(
(
verified that the property OWl1er(s) of record at the time of issuance oftllese
findings is DBSI Realty.
4. Required Findings per Zoning Ordillance
a~ See Exhibit D for the findings required for this application.
B. COllclusions of Law
1. TIle City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred .upon it by the "Local Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I~C~ ~67-
6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Developlnent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zoning maps thereof. TIle City of Meridian. has, by ordil1ance, established tIle
Impact Area and the Amended COlnprellensive Plal1 of tIle City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No~ 02-382 and Maps.
3~ The conditions shall be reviewa.ble by tIle City COUI1Cil :pursuallt to Meridian City Code
9 11-17-9.
4. Due consideration has been given to the COlTI.lnent(s) received fr01TI tIle govermnental
subdivisions .providing services in the City of Meridian plannin.g jUlisdiction~
5. It is fOUIld public facilities and services required by the proposed develop.ment will not
impose expense .u.pon the public if the attached conditio.ns of approval are ilnposed.
6. That the City l1as granted all order of approval ill accordance witll this Decision, wllic11
shall be signed by the Mayor alld City Clerk and. then a copy served by the Clerl( UpOl1
tile applicant, tIle Plal111ing and Zoning Department, the Public Works .Departlnent and
any affected .party requesting notice.
7. Tllat this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Site Plan dated
Decel11ber 14, 2004 as s110wn in Exhibit B, and tIle Site Specific and Gen.eral
COlnments/Conditions in Exhibit C. The conditions are conclu.ded to be reasonable and
tIle applicant sllalI Ineet such requireln.ents as a conditiol1 of approval of the application~
c. Decision and Order
P.ursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridial1 City Code S 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. TIle appli.cant's CU.p Site Plan as evidenced by havil1g submitted the site .plan dated
Decelnber 14, 2004 is hereby co:nditionally approved; a11d
2~ The Site S.pecific al1d Stal1dard Comlnents are as shown in Exhibit c~
.0. Notice of Applicable Time Lilnits
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). CUP-04-055 - PAGE 2 Of 4
(.:. i
~..
t .
\.,....... ..
1. Notice of Eighteen (18) MontIl Conditional .Use Pel1nit Duration
Please take notice that the co.nditio.nal use pennit s.hall be valid for a maxilnulu period
of eigllteen (18) months unless otllerwise approved by the council. Duri.ng this time,
the permit 1101der lTI.USt COln.mence the use as permitted in accordance with the
conditi.ons of approval, satisfy the requirelnents set fo:rtl1 in the conditions of approval,
acquire building permits alld co:mmence construction of:permal1ent footings or
structures on or in the ground. In this context "structures" shall include sewer al1d
water lin.es, streets or building construction~ The applicant has specified in the
a,pplication and to the cOlmnissio.n and council a construction schedule and cOlnpletion
date for the project. If the completion date specified for t1le project is exceeded, the
conditional use application shall becolne null and void. However, th.e ap.plicant may
submit an ap.plication for a tilne extension on the project for city council review. The
application for time extension sIlall be suhluitted at least thitty (30) days prior to the
deadline for cOln:p]etion of t1le project. For :projects requiril1g platting, the final plat
must be record.ed within this eighteen (18) month period. For .projects with multiple
.p.hases, the eighteen (18) lTIOl1th deadline shall a:pply to tIle first pllase~ In the evel1t tIlat
the develoPlnent is made in successive contiguous segtne11ts or multiple .phases, such
phases s.hall be constru.cted within su.ccessive intervals of one year from the original
date of approval by the co.unciL If tIle successive phases are 110t sublnitted. within one
year intervals, the conditional approval ofth.e future pllases shall be null and void~
(MCC 11-17-4.B.)
E~ Notice of Final Action a.nd Rigllt to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Ap.plicant is hereby 110tified tllat pursuant to Ida.ho Code 67-8003, tIle Owner Inay
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request lTIUSt be in writing, and In.ust be filed
with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eig11t (28) days after the final decision
concerning tile matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll tIle
tilne period within whicll a Petition for Judicial Review may.be filed.
2. Please take notice tllat this is a final action of the governil1g body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has
an interest in real pro.perty which .may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the conditional use pennit approvalluay within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
tllis decision and order seek a ju.dicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idallo
Code.
F. Exllibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: A.pproved Site PlaIl CUP
Ex.hibit C: Site Specific and Standard COlTIlnents
Exhibit D: Conditional Use Permit Findil1gs
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S), CUP-04-055 - PAGE 3 Of 4
(~
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held 0.0 the
/rt~&ft-~ , 2005.
15~
day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHA.UN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTIN.E DONNELL
VOTED
~
COUNCI.L .MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
~
COUN.CIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAK:ER)
~
VOTED
Attest:
and City Attolney.
~)
G
Dated: 4 - \-05
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CAS E NO(S). CUP-04-055 - PAGE 4 Of 4
("
:EXHIBIT A
DBSI Realty CDP-04-055
Legal Description
f\'lERIDlr\N I;REE\V,\ \' ~4SS0(.:lf\.1~I~S
Parcel for Dcveloprncl1t
A tract of land situated in the Sou lhcast Qu arter 0 f the S outlnvcst Quarter of Scctio n J 3 ~ T o\vnshi p .1-
North~ Range 1 \Vest, BOise Meridjnll~ ,\da County~ fd,lho~ more partjcularJy described as follows~
Comnlcncing at a 5/S pin fnarking the South Quarter Cooler of said Section 13~ thence along the
L:lL~l \V cst See (1011 Li 11C 0 f~ said Sect 1 ()ll 1.3.
North 89026 ~2T' \Vest along the centerline of Overland Road, il distance of 1327,S l feet to a point
Thence leaving sajd Section Line'
North OQ06~51'~ East 48.00 feet to the POINT Of BEGINNlNG~ Thence conlinuing
Norlh 0006 ~51~' East 360,23 feet to a po~nl.,. Thence
South 90000'OO~'' East 749< 95 feet to 3. point. Thence
Thence South 0006~5r~ \Vest 367<56 feet to a point Thence
N.orth 89026~2T' 'Vest 749,8l teet to the POINT OF BE(ilNNINU.
Said parcel containing 6.27 aces lllorc or less.
~ . .. ~ J~.f-!: (.~ J f..f ~T... ~ ? ~ ~ T \-: T (. '.J) t u." r I (" J I) . ~~f !"*.l:.i- ~)i 'H.
!
I
h
I ~~:
: .:.: : ~. .:..;.~: ~ .-~: :. ~ :=-: .:
E~\~HIRIT it
... .. . . ~ .. :
~...- ....... ,...,... ........- -.... ~
~
. f-::.~..~..:.::.....:...~~..~ _ :-. <~f<)).:;..t ?<t} 2:~
~'~i
:.~
1~ ;
.~)
v 0 a.. ... !I_ _ ....,.~. .
'~~~.~ ..t. .''i
~/J
* I...
~ ~...
~ f ~~~.
::'"~ ~ ;
:t. I~ ~
:[!I ~
.~..J ~
--.. ,..~J .~.
..-.. !.i 0.2 - } .Q....~L:.ll.~ .!...-!- :;-j.~ ~ ~ __
- . . . ::. .~) j ./.;~: -;. .:. ...~
: ~.:".- ....: .=-
-. .... .. .... -. . ............. .... . .
/y".
{. .
, f"
I
.--1
!
I :;
} ~
I.;:~
Ii.
I ~..~
- . - _.. -. ~ - - --_ J ..-:
!~
~
~: .. . : .::.:.: .::. ~. :}~. :~. j .~.: .~
~: .::...:: <.. ;.:: :.. /--==. \. (:: ::-::-: ") :~ r.
.. .. ~... . ,/
tJ
!..
I
~... ~..r.:: ~~
~.... ......:
!i.t~"~-::-;!-..!ii ..~... {'~.~..~ ~
( .
(~.._..
EXHIBIT B
DBSI Realty
CUP-04-055
Approved Site Plan
~).: (~>::~.:. =.;~
~. :~~.~: ~; :~ ~~ (~~~. :.
: ; .~:.;~ !~~:: ;..~~. . .. . ,... ... .. ........ ../
t.
( .
f u :r. =. f! t. ~~~ f.t:~~.~ ~
U.i to :.-...:1-
~
I r
'j~
tf
-I~b
l ~~ ....,. .
,:j). 15
i.:.l. ~
fti~~ll~t!.J~.~!;:~ ~l:.:! ~ ~~
-;-!:::::. .. .
.:, '.J.. ~~.. ..... . .. .. ..' ...... J~ [~
. ~ ~ . N. ............... ..- I~
r-. t ~~ ~.i.~ t.r t( ~ ~ ~
-::. :.- :
~.
~...:
:c;;
I
~
I
I
L ---.- .. ------. --~~_..... .~".""-_......m'.___... ...
. ~..:..: ~.......:.~~..~..~.~~~.~---==-...~:=<. ~ (:7[1L.~.~.(i.~i ..... ... .-.. _m -_...... ,...... ... _... ...
... ..................................................-...........-..............._~.-..............
. _.~t~1 ...,'~n..'.., j>' ~....
. .... .~.................. ~......-.-............... ~ . . --.......... .. .................... ................r. . . . ---.--.- ....._.. ... ....._
~~
~...~
~~~__ c~ u ~.!J
('....
~.
EXHIBIT C
DBSI Realty
CUP-04-055 Site Specific and Standard Comments
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. TIle relocatiol1 of tIle Kennedy :LateraI must be approved by the Nampa Meridian
Irrigation District.
2. The applicant lTIUst be responsible for the connection to tIle Blac.k Cat Trunk
Sewer and luaintain cOlTI.pliance with Meridian Public Works for sewer
cOlU1ections at this location.
CON:DITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Setbacks are approved as depicted on the site :plan (CU-l dated 12~10.04).
2. Landscaping and Parking are not approved as depicted on sheet L-I as drawn o.n
12/7/04 T.he applicant shall submit a landscape/parking plan in compliance with
MCC 11-13 al1d 12-13.
3. TIle building height is approved as depicted on the elevation plan (CU-2 dated
12.10. 04) ~ TIle PI anned Developluent waiver of the 40 foot maxiln.um Ileight
requiremellt of MCC 11-9-1 schedule of bulk and coverage controls will .be
waived to allow tIle 52 foot b.uilding .height.
4. All surface parking sllall conform to the Inillilnu:m dilnens.ions per ordinance of 9'
x 19' with 25' wide drive aisles.
5. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the expiratio.n provisions set fortI1
ill MCC 11-17-4.B.
6. Ap.plicant must cOlnply with tIle conditions of the conditional use, planned
development, and developlnent agree.lnent for CU:P/PD-OI-009Treasure Valley
Teclmical Cel1ter Meridian Freeway Associates / DBSI Industrial Liluited
P artn ership.
7~ All exterior lighting, whether attaclled to tIle building or located witl1in tIle
parking lot, shall be down-sllielded or otherwise altered so that the ligllt does n.ot
spillover onto adjacent propel1ies or right-of-way. All parking lot ligllting s11all
.be in accordallce with Ordinance 11-13~4C.
8. All signage sllall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of
the City Zoning. and Develo.pluent Ordinallce. All signage is subject to design
c:no .
review and shall require separate .permits.
9. All constructio:n and site improvements shall con.form to the requirements of the
Alnericans witll Disabilities Act and the adopted building and fire codes~
10. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is
required and sIlal] .be sublnitted to the City Engineer COrd. 557, 10-1-91) for all
off-street .parking areas. Stann water treatment and dis.posal must be designed in
accordance witll Department of Envirorunental Quality 1997 publication Catalog
of Stonn Water Best Managelnent Practices for Idal10 Cities and COul1ties and
City of Meridian standards al1d policies~ Off-site disposal into surface water is
.prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving strealTI
provides written autllorization prior to developtnent plan approval. The applicant
is responsible for filing all necessary applications witll the Idaho Departlnent of
.Water Resources regarding S.hallow Injection Wells.
11. Certificate of Occupancy: All required ilnprovements must be cOlnplete plior to
obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed d.eveloprnent. A telnporary
Certificate of Occupancy Inay be obtained by providing surety to the City in the
fann of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 11 0% of the cost of the req.uired
improvements (inclu.ding paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid
lTIUst accolnpany any request for tern.porary occupancy.
12. Sanitary sewer and water service shall be via existing service lines in Meadow
La.ke Village that will be extended as .part of this proposed developtnent.
A.p.plical1t shall coordil1ate size and ro.uti.ng witl1 the .Public Works Department.
13. Underground year-round pressurized inigation lTIUSt be provided (froIn an
existing system) to alllal1dscape areas on this site.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. Acceptance of the water su.pply for fire .protection will be by the Meridial1 Fire
DepartInent alld water quality by the Melidian .Water Departlnent for bacteria
testing.
2. Final Approval of tIle fire l1ydrant locations sllall .be by tile Melidian Fire
D ep artln en t.
a. Fire Hydrants s.ha1111ave the 4 Yi" outlet face the main street or parking lot
aisl e.
b~ T.he Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does 110t have addresses 0.0
it
c. Fire hydrallt luarkers shall .be provided per Public Works spec~
d. Locatio.us wit!1 fire hydral1ts sllall :have the curb painted red 10' to each
side of the hydra11t location.
e. Fire Hyd~.ants shall be placed on comers whell spacing .pennits.
('.'
t. .
f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 1 0'.
g~ Fire hydrants sIlalI be place 18" above finish grade.
3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
4. All Common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of28' inside and
48' outside and shall have a clear drivil1g surface whic.h is 20' wide.
5. Operational fire hydrants and telnporary or permal1el1t street signs are required
before cOlnbustib.le constructio.n begins.
6. Fire lanes and streets sllalI have a vertical clearance of 13'6". This includes
mature landsca.ping
7. COluluercial and office occupancies will require a fi.re-flow consistent witll tIle
International Fire Code to service the .proposed project. Fire .hydrants s.hall .be
placed per Appendix D.
8~ The office/retail lot will llave an unkn.own transient population and will .have an
unknow.n ill.pact on Meridian Fire Departtnent call volUlnes~ TIle Meridian Fire
Department has experienced 2397 responses in the year 2003~ According to a report
completed by Fire & Em.ergency Services Consulting Group OUf requests for service
are projected to reach 2800 in tIle year 2005 and 3800 by the year 20.1. O.
9. TIle proposed project lies o.utside tIle five-min.ute response zone goal.
Achievetnent of tllis goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is illtended to
enhance the probability of a favora.ble Qutcolne on a request for Basic Life
Support~ The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for
facilities tl1at are located within 1.5 miles froln a given location and sufficient
operational funds to staff t]le facilities.
1 O~ Provide a Knoxbox entry system for the complex .prior to occupal1cy.
11. The first digit of the Office Suite sIlall correspond to tIle floor level.
12~ A TIle application s11all work with city staff to provide an address identification plan
including a pylon/monulnel1t sign at the required intersection(s).
13. Provide exterior egress lighting as required by tIle International Building & Fire
Codes.
14. W11ere a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved i.nto or
within the jurisdiction is lTIOre than 400 feet (122 In) frOlU a hydrant 011 a fire
apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route arou.nd the exterior of the
(.
.....~..
t
facility or b.uilding, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where req.uired
by the code official. For buildings equip.ped throughout with an approved autolnatic
sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903~3.1.1 or 903.3~ 1 ~2 the
distance requirement s.hall be 600 feet (183)~
a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be
600 feet (183 In).
b. For .buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler
system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3 ~ 1.2, the
distance requirelnel1t sllalI be 600 feet (183 m).
15. There shall be a fire l1ydrant withil1 1 00' of all fire departluent connections.
16. B.uildings over 30' in l1eight are required to .have access roads in accordance with
Appendix D Section DIOS.
SANITARY SERVICES CORP. COMM.ENT:
1 ~ Please contact Bill Gregory at sse (888-3999) for detailed review of your
proposal and sublnit stalnped (approved) plaI1S wit!l your certificate of zoning
co:m:pliance application.
ACHD:
1 ~ Compliance with co.nditions of ap.proval as listed. in CUP-O 1-009
EXHIBIT D
DBSI
CUP-04-055
Conditional Use Permit Findings
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of
each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, an.d may approve a
conditional use permit if they shall fmd evidence .presented at the hearing(s) .is
adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards,
open spaces, parl<ing, landscaping and other features as may be required by
this ordinance;
Staff finds tllat tIle su.bject property is large e.no.ugh to aCCOilllTIodate the req.uested
use and all otller required features as noted above. As part of th.e planned
development, tIle ap.plicant .has submitted a conceptual plan. The parking and
landscape plan as s.ubtuitted under sheet L-I on December 7,2004 is not ap.proved
and an approved landsca.pe plan lnust be submitted prior to issuance of a
certificate of zo.ning co.m.pliance~
Standard ordil1ance .parking requirements for "Office, Retail, Daycare" and/or
Mixed. uses apply to the site. TIle standard for Retail stores is one space .per 200
gross square feet; tIle stalldard for professio.nal offices is one space per 400 gross
square feet. The proposed two buildings are 60,000 gross square feet eac.h,
requiring 200-300 parking s.paces based on use. The applicant has proposed 323
parkin.g spaces ill compliance with tIle Chapter 11 Section 13 MCC, 110wever the
landscape plall requires detailed review an.d tTIodifications to .parking standards
prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning cOlnpliance. Staff feels the site .has
adequate area in order to comply with the landsca:pe alld parking requirelu.e.nts
.based on the eonce.ptual review~
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the
Meridian Comprehenslve Plan and in accordance with the requirements of
this Ordinance;
TIle current COluprehensive Plal1 Land .U se Map designates the property as
"IndustriaL" Stafffinds tllat the pro:posed retail/office uses are not in cOlnpliance
with the 2002 COln.prehensive plan and are prohibited uses under the existing
zoning ordinance. TIle overall project was a.pproved as a conditional use for a
planned deveJoplnent in order to allow use exceptions under CUP/P.D 01-009, the
applicant has applied the exelnption to this project. The current proposal is also a
(". .
-.~ ~ .. .. ...
(/.:..~
planned d.evelopment to modify the luaximum :height requirement and allow a 52'
maximum building height. If the project is approved as a Planned Develop.ment,
it will meet the luinimUlTI requirements of th.e use exception applied in CUP iP.D
01-009.
c. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible
with other uses in the general neighborhood and \vith the existing or
intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely
change the essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that tIle .proposed office may not adversely change tIle eXIsting
(Industrial) or illtended (in.dustrial) character of the general vicinity. TIle
proposed :project boundary is surrounded on two sides by other property owned by
the Meridial1 Freeway Associates project and is ill cOlnpliance with the approved
Planned Development for the project Any ilnpacts of the offi.ce will lil<ely .be
restricted to existing and future .p.hases of tIle project itself
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval
imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate tllat the :proposed office/retail uses will adversely affect
adjacent .properties due to the fact that the proposed uses are in cOlnplial1ce with
the conceptual plan for DBS1JMeridian Freeway Associates Planned Developluent
CUP /PDO 1-009. The COlnmission an.d Council s.hould consider any testimony
(written and oral) .presented at the public l1earings before tnaking this finding.
E~ That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities
and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for
the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide
adequately any such services;
Staff finds tllat tIle proposed developnlent can be adequately served by the
essential pu.blic facilities and services listed a.bove. City water & sewer Inains
have been COllstructed within the Meridian. Freeway Associates project al1d will
be extended as part of this proposed d.evelopment. Sewer alld Water flows :ITIust
be detelmined .by Public Works and operate in compliance with. the Public Works
standards. The existing Western Electronics facility east of the site is served by a
privately owned and lTI.aintained sewage lift statiO!l that discllarges to a City of
Meridian sewer lua.in in Overland Road. Bear Creek Estates Subdivision
discharges to the same Inanhole~ Because Bear Cree.k Estates and the Western
Electronics facilities use the lift statiol1, only the projected excess capacity in t11e
receiving sewer is available for future development. According to analysis
cOlupleted u.nder CUPOI-009, computer model calculations show that the Western
Electro.nics lift station is limited to a peak flow of 80 gallons .per Ininute. Tile
.project must contillue to be served by the existing .private lift station and pressure
c... .
{< ,
\:.:...... ..
main until such time as the Black Cat Trunk is available to serve this area. T.he
lift station ma.y .not discharge a flow greater t]lan 80 gallons per lninute at any
ti:1ne~ A provision lUust be made in the sal1itary sewer system su.ch that tile lift
station can be abandoned and tIle site sewer system connected to the Black Cat
Trunk Sewer, or a lateral thereof, wIlen it is available. "Available" shall be
d.efined as the time when the sewer is extended thrOUgll adjacent property to the
western bo.undary of this project. This .project must include relocation of the lift
stati.on to tIle northwest corller or installation of dry-line sewer to the northwest
comer with. this proj ect. The applicant shall be res.-ponsible for the eventual
connectioll to the Black Cat Tru.nk Sewer. Drainage will be retail1ed on site.
Trasll enclosures l1ave been provided on-site for refuse disposaL The applicant
needs to coordinate with the Fire Departlnent regarding the fire lanes.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for pu.blic facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed development will not be detrimental to tIle economic
welfare of the cOffiln.unity, nor would it create the .need for any new facilities or
services to be paid for by the .pu.blic. All required ilTI.proveln.ents, including
landscaping, paving, parking, installation of services and roads, etc. will be paid
for .by the developer. Tlle primary public costs to serve the project will be for fire
alld police services.
The building heigl1ts are requested to be allowed a lnaximUlTI of 52 feet. The
additional height of the building may ilTI.pact the serviceability of the site for fire,
police, and lTIunicipal agencies. T.he ap.plicant must cOIn.ply with the additional
conditions as defined by the Meridian Fire De.palilnel1t with regard to oversized
buildings.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property, or general \velfare by reason of excessive .production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Allligl1ting s.hall be downfacing and designed as n.ot to leave the site~ All signage
shall comply with the standards as set forth MCC 11-14~
The parking and maneuvering of cars and pedestrians may generate additional
noise for surrounding properties~ However, staff does not believe th.at the
additional noise should be excessive, the site lies in an. industrial area where
future development sIlall be cOlnpatible to higllway noise and vibration~ Staff
finds that the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, tnaterials,
eq.uipment and conditions of operation that will be detriluental to allY persons,
property, or general welfare by reason of excessive :productio.n of traffic, 11oise:
slTIoke, fu.mes, glare or odors, if all conditions are complied Wit11.
(.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which
shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on
surrounding public streets;
Staff finds that the cO.1TIlnercial uses of tllis site will impact the level and flow of
traffic on Overland Road. Access to this site was previously approved with
Western Electronics to the east of the site. The signalized. intersection at Overlalld
and Meridian will greatly increase capacity of the intersectio.n to handle tIle
additional trips. The applicant sllould comply with ACHD policies ill order to
preserve the capacity and lTIOVement o.n Overland Road..
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
n.atural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
The Kennedy LaterallTIUst be approved to be tiled as part of the prior CUP
application CUP 01-009. StaffreCOlTIlnends that tIle COlll"Iuission and Council
reference any public testilTIOny that Inay .be presented to determine wl1ether or not
t]le proposed developm.ent Inay result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
natural or scenic feature(s) of importance ofwhic.h staff is unaware.
(.
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of a Request for Preliminary/Final Plat approval for four (4) commercial
building lots on 8.02 acres in an I-L zone for Nola Subdivision, by Anderson/Lockwood
Foundation.
Case No. PFP-04-008
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 15, 2005
A~ Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written notice
mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within. three hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the property~ The notice of public hearing before the
City Council was :posted upon the property under consideration more than one week
before said hearing. All otller noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code ~67-
6509~
The matters were duly consid.ered by the City Council at the March 15,2005, public
hearing. The ap.plicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions
.providing services within the planning jurisdiction of tIle City of Meridian were
given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence~
b. Written and oral testimony was received on this Inatter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the official meeting minutes (for
oral testimony).
c~ The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted public hearings and issued a
recommendation for approval to City COUll.cil.
d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered tIle
evidence and th.e record in. this matter.
2. Process Facts
a~ There .has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Idaho Code ~67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ~g 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report.
3. Application and Property Facts
a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the
Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDfNGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. PP-04-034 - PAGE 1 Of 4
\-.;
/"
\.
verified that the property owner of record at the time of issuance of these findings is
Anderson/Lockwood Foundation.
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Su.bdivision Ordinances
a. See Exhibit D for the findings required for the Preliminary/Final Plat ap.plication.
B. Conclusions of Law
l~ The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon. it by the "Local Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I~C. ~67-
6503).
2. TIle Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and
Developlnent Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all
current zoning .maps thereof The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established tIle
Impact Area and the Atnended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was
adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and M~ps~
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code
S 11-17-9.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received. from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian .planningjurisdiction.
5. It is found :public facilities and services required by the proposed develop:ment will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6~ That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall .be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the ap.plicant, the Planning and Zoning De.partment, the Public Works Department and
any affected party requesting notice~
7~ That this approval is subject to tIle Legal Description in Exhibit A, tIle Prelilninary Plat
dated October 26,2004 as shown in Exhibit B, and the Conditions of Approval in
Exhibit C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet
such requirements as a condition of approval of the ap.plication.
c. Decision. and. Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code g 12-3-5 and
based upon the above and. foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein. adopted, it is .hereby
ordered that
1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced by having submitted tIle Prelilninary Plat
dated January 20, 2005 is hereby conditio.nally approved;
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. PP-04-034 - "PAGE 2 Of 4
(.....:... .
(~~'.-' ..
2. The following modification to the site specific conditio.fis for the Preliminary/Final Plat
were made at the 3-15-05 City Council heari.ng;
a) Delete Site Specific Condition #6, which reads: "Applicant is to execute a
.blanket easement which provides a permanent pedestrian easement in favor of
the City of Meridian on the subject property in the future of sufficient width to
cover a ten foot wide pathway along Locust Grove Road and East Pine
A venue..'~
3.. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in Exhibit C.
D.. Notice afFinal Action and Rig11t to R.egulatory Ta.kings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67 -8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request .must be in writing, and must be filed
with the City Clerk not more than. twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision
concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the
time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2.. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Ida.ho Code S 67 -6521 an affected person being a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after tIle date of this decision and. order
seek ajudicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
E. Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Approved Preliminary Plat (1-20-05, with conditions)
Exhibit C: Preliminary/Final Plat Conditions of Approval (all agencies)
Exhibit D: Preliminary/Final Plat Findings
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting l1eld on the \5th
'ilru1i ), , 2005.
day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED Lj~
COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL
VOTED ~
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED /jQtL
CITY OF M.ERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CO.NCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO. PP-04-034 - PAGE 3 Of 4
,I"
\
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED ~Lfl-
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAICER)
VOTED -
~7'~.~'
/~ .~9??~.' -. .'. "
May~v'~aft1!iW .~ld. ...~Weerd
ii~~ ~1f~ ~!~l' . ~~~~1t~~~::~1.~~h
.~/I r J0-:;~ ~, ,.. ~ ~l'"y, ~%'f;." ~<i.[..
ii. ~i. ~o~ ~~.. ~. '-~~\
:! ~ SE:1~ r "" t
~ ~j( , . ...:. :~
,.: \~' .~oJ ..: ~:.
~. r;}A . l..-) 4J~" ,.:;
" ~{~ " j ... ~"II:
.\ ~!,j:--~'4,.~t 1S'. . '~j.t'_~.,. ~~~:,
';...t~b. . ~~~;'~f;~~'~
~ ~ ~h:~.~tt' ~ I~' ~~v. .
Copy served u.pon A.p.pllcant, The Plannlng'~~;~~}:YJIg:~[jepartment, Public Works Department
Attest:
and City Attorney.
Dated: 3 ~ j ~ ,OS
ClTY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND .DECISION & a.R.DER
CASE "NO. PP-04-034 - PAGE 4 Of 4
(." .
EXHIBIT A
Nola Subdivision
PFP-04-008
Legal Description
B
UNLIMITED BOUNDARIES. INC~ 'f)BA
Bergey Land Surveying
11 03 W. .Main St.
Middleton, ID 83644
Walt Neitz, PLS
Doug Bergey, PLS
Phone: 208~585.S858
Fax: 208.585 Ir 9001
DESCRIPTION FOR
ANDERSON/LOCKWOOD FOUNDATION
NOLA SUBDIVISION
A PORTION OF THE NWl/4SW1/4
SECTION B, T ~ 3N., R. lE.., B'OM.,
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
BLOCK I, being a parcel of land as shown on Record of
Survey No. 5037, Instrument Number 100054857, of the
official records of Ada County, Idaho, and lying in the
NWl/4SWl/4 of Section 8t T.3N., RIE~, B~M., Ada County,
Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said NWl/4SWl/4 of
Section 8; thence, S89054'09;1"E... 60.00 feet, along the
northerly boundary line of said 81/11/4 of Section at .to the
POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, continuing along said northerly boundary line,
889054' 09llE, 547.35 fee.t, to a point,
Thence, departing said northerly boundary line,
S00027'51"W, 686~04 feet, to an iron pin,
Thence, N88030'OO"W, 547~20 feet, to an iron pin,
Thence, NOQo26' 40"E, 672 ~ 64 feet, to the POINT OF
BEGINNING, of said Block 1, comprising 8~53 acres,
more or less.
SUBJECT TO: Any easements or reservations of record or
appearing on the above described parcel of land.
il
~:1 j
o~i p
~ ~ = -4 J It I
~! ~ S j i XII
I aJ! j~I
~ :3 tl i
O"'U :r
z ~:
:]
~I
~ ~Ji!~
. 11
III J inl, C:I
11;1= liiih iuill
I!
; ; ; ; II i ;11
· ~ IIII i s :ii I
1111
l 1;1 a
us JI sl
:~ '11111:
JII~ Illil
!. II i!l:!
:- I. ~:!I~
til. b 'Iii!
!Ia ~i J 'I
a!..1 & jl~
;11:11 ~~II~
Iml... --IU-.-I
Ili;'III,:llr
M~2!g
lB 3~'1d
EXHIBIT B
Nola Subdivision
PFP-04-008
Preliminary Plat
R
i
1
~. f '
<:. 1l[I) I & .IllIIiI:: i
(..
c
-
o..-J
I II
I I I
.. II I.
I!! 1 U !II
till · I III
I !~
)1 ! I, ' ~
"!J! flllllJJl IJ "
~~ illllill J~:fIEllj}J,fI1IJlll
~ r I ~ I f I f I J I. Ii! j ~ ~ I f Iff .11 filII. t I
~t! I ~ I [ \ \)
J lit ~
S3ICI'tQNfl()8 031 I~.IIJNn
...
~
~
!
o
I
....
2
le06S89SBZ ~1;91 93g~/Eellg
( .
I~.~^..
\.:,..... ..
EXHIBIT C
Nola Subdivision
PFP-04-008
Conditions of Approval
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL PLAT)
1. Make the following modifications to the final plat prior to recordation:
a. The 25- foot landscape easement along Locust Grove Road. shall be extended
to the southern boundary of Lot 4.
b. The IO-foot landscape easement along Nola Road shall be extended to the
southern. bo.undary of Lot 4.
c. Provide a note granting cross-access to Lots 1, 2, and 3 to utilize the new
drive access to East Pine Avenue.
d. Modify note #6 to include the extended landscape easelnents on Lot 4.
2. The ap.pli.cant shall revise the Landscape Plan, dated 1/18/05 by Beck and Baird, and
submit 10 copies of the revised plan to the City Clerk's office at least 10 days prior to
the City Council hearing. The Lan.dscape Plan shows a conifer placed within the
street buffer along Locust Grove Road near the property line between Lots 1 and 4,
which is prohi bi ted by Meridian City Code 12-13 - 7 - 2. TIle conifer shall be removed
from the landscape plan or :placed in a location which cOlnplies with MCC 12-13-7-2.
The Landscape Plan shall also be revise to show the four (4) additional trees required
in the street buffer along Nola Road..
3. The applicant shall sublnit CCR's that detail th.e responsibilities for tIle maintenance
of the landscaping and co.mmon parking and drainage areas for tIle subdivisio.ll prior
to the City Council hearing.
4~ Water service to this site shall be via service line extensions from the existing mains
adjacent to the property. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of
easements, for any mains tl1at are required to provide service.
5. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via :main line extensions to an existing main
adjacent to the property. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of
easements, for any mains that are required to provide service4
6. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, .prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
7~ Revise or add the following .notes on the face of the plat:
/:.
f~.
(5.) "Building setbacks and dimensional standards in this subdivision shall be in
comvliance with Title 1] and Title 12 of the Meridian Citv Code unless
otherwise modified bv Conditional Use Permit (CUP-04-025) which
allowed for reduced lot sizes and lot frontages. ,J
(6~) HRe-word, responsibility lies with the bllsiness owner's association. "
(12.) tiThe owner of each lot across which passes an irrigation/drainage ditch or
pipe, is responsible for the maintenance thereof, unless such
responsibility has been assumed by an irrigation/drainage district. "
(13.) ffThe bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-
inches above the highest established normal groundwater elevation.. "
8. Revise the Water Service Origin Statement in the Certificate of Owner's to simply
state "_ . . The Ci ty of Meridian, VI ater Department"
9. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street NaIne Committee's "Final" letter for
the street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to
comply.
10_ Other than the access point specifically approved on East Pine Avenue with this
application by ACHD, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road or East Pine Avenue is
prohibited.
11. Required landscape b.uffers/street improvements sllalI be :made by th.e
developer/subdivider as part of the final plat.
12. Provide a recorded copy of the cross access agreement for Lots '1, 2, and. 3 to utilize
the new drive access to East Pine Avenue.
GENERAL CONDITIONS (PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL PLAT)
1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property sllaII be replaced by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inclles of trees that
were removed. Required. landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees
for those trees that are removed~
2. Submit compaction test results to the Meridian Building D~partment for any building
pads within lots receiving engineered backfill.
3. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this
development The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigatio.n systems be
sup.plied by a year-round source of water.. TIle applicant proposes connection to City
of Meridian water for irrigation. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer
shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
signature on tIle final plat by the City E.ngineer.
4. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed. to ensure that water
will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all
( ...
./.......
( .
sto.rms up to and including a I DO-year storm event. Side slopes within drainage areas
shall not exceed 3: 1 ~ The project engineer should pay close attentiol1 to tIle results of
field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics d.uring the
design and construction phases.
5. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works
Department.
6. Install 250-watt, .high-pressure sodium streetlights at locations designated by the
Public Works Departm.ent. Street light contractor sIlall obtain an approved design
and permit from the Public Works Department prior to cOlnmencing installations.
7. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with tIle Meridian Post Office.
8. All proposed fel1cing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
9. All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance witll MCC 12-5-2.K. Prior to
signature of the final plat(s), all sidewalks shall be constructed or a financial
guarantee that said improvements will be cOlnpleted shall be provided.
10. A note shall be placed on the final plat stating that unless otherwise approved, all
building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance in effect at the
time of building permit submittal.
11 ~ Applicant shall be required to pay P.ublic Works develo:pment plan review, and
construction. inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
12. Plat approval shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in MCC.
13. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated,
pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constru.cted, and
road base approved by the Ada County Highway District .prior to applying for
building permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved
:prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy~ A letter of credit or cash surety in the
amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, pathways, landscaping, pressurized
irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc~, prior to signature on the final plat.
14. COffi.plete the Certificate of Owners and. accompanying Acknowledgment.
15. Applicant shall be responsible for application and conlpliance witll any Section 404
Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
16. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES
Permitting that may .be required by the E.nvironmental Protection Agency.
c=..' .::
17. Staff's failure to cite specific ordillance prOVISIons or terms of the approved
prelilninary plat or final plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for
compliance.
OTHER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water
DepartInent.
2. Final Approval of the fire l1ydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 Y2" outlet face tIle main street or parking lot
aisle~
b. The Fire l1ydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c~ Fire hydrant .markers shall be .provided per Public Works spec.
d~ Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of
the l1ydrant location~
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers.
f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
4. Provide a 20' wide Fire Lane for all internal and external roadways.
5.. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or .permanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins.
6. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with the
International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall .be placed
an average of300' apart
7. The fire department requests tllat any future signalization installed as the result of the
development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and
efficient response by fire and emergency .medical service vehicles. This cost of this
installation is to be borne by the develo.per.
8. All processes & storage practices shall be required to comply with the International Fire
Code~
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
1. Prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance, that applicant shall submit an approved
site plan from sse.
MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT
(-
(
1 ~ Pathway and Trail standards: The proposed pathway and/or trail shall meet the
standards as set forth in the August 2003 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation
System Plan, pgS4 3-2 and 3-3, sections B & C.
2. Standard for City to assume Maintenance of a section of Pathway: The pathway must
COllilect from one major arterial to another, and either an easelnent or ownership deed
In.ust be granted .before the city will assume the mainte.nance of any section of
pathway.
3. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian
Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13-6) will be followed.
4. Stao.dard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard
established in the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13) will be
followed.
NAMPAlMERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
1. If all storm drainage is retained on site tllere will.be no impact on Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District and no further review will be required~ However, if any surface
drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land
Use Change Application be filed for review prior to final platting. Please contact
Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information.
2. All laterals and waste ways must be protected.
3. The developer must comply with Idallo Code 31-3805.
4. It is recommended that irrigatio.n water be made available to all developments within
the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District.
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
1. After written approvals from appropriate entities are submitted we can approve this
proposal for central sewage and central water.
2.. The following plans must be submitted and approved by the Idaho Department of
Health and Welfare: central sewage and central water~
3. Run-off is not to create a mosquito .breeding problem.
4. The engineers and architects involved wit]1 the design of the subject project shall
obtain cu:rrent best management .practices for stormwater disposal and design a
stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water
degradation.
ACHD CONDITIONS
.{V
{ . . .
(.
enhancements)~ An annual survey win be required of the TMAlTMO to monitor participation in
aJternative transportation programs and fOf\Yarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office.
5~
Other Access
Pine Avenue is classified as a minor arteriaL Other than the access specifically approved with this
application. no additional access points will be approved. A note of this access restriction shaH be
placed on the .final plat.
c~
Special Notice to the City of Meridian
Lot 1 does not have a driveway access to Pine Avenue or to the future Locust Grove Road. Only one
driveway will be allowed on Pine Avenue for this deveropment. The applicant shou Id place a note on
the plat that would provide cross access among all of the lots and ensure that each lot can utilize the
one shared driveway on Pine Avenue.
D.
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1 ~
Coordinate the additional right-of~way dedicatjon with District staff for the southeast comer of the
intersection of Pine Avenue and Locust Grove Road. The right-of-way purchase and safe agreement
and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for
signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a buifding permi~ (or other required
permits) ~ whichever occurs first Allow up to 30 business days to process the rlght-of..way dedication
after receipt of all requested materiaL The owner win be paid the fair market va rue of the right-oF-way
dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of
application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking groundl in accordance with the ACHD
Ordinance in effect at that time (currenUy Ordinance #200). if funds are avaUable,
2~
Dedicate a total of 48-feet of rightwof-way from the centerline of Pine Avenue abutting the parcel by
means of a warranty deed. The right-oF-way purchase and safe agreement and deed must be
completed and signed by the appHcant prior to scheduling the finaJ plat for signature by the AC H D
Commission or prior to issuance of a building pannit (or other required permits). whichever occurs
first AUow up to 30 business days to process the right--of-way dedication after recefpt of aU requested
materiaL The owner win be paid the fair market value of the right-or-way dedicated which is an
addition to existing ACHO right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of apprication to the impact fee
administrator prior to breaking groundt in accordance with the ACHD Ordinance in effect at that time
(currently Ordinance #198)~ if funds are avaHa bre.
Provide a road trust to the District for the cost of the sidewalk abutting the site for Locust Grove Road
The approximate cost of the road trust would be ~ ($20 a lineal foott 630~feet)L
4.
Construct a 5-foot detached sidewalk on Pine Avenue abutting the site from the jntersection of Pine
Avenue and Nola Road to a point 450~feet westt as proposed" Submit a road trust to the District for
the portion of sidewalk proposed to NOT be constructed at this time (approximately 1 aD-feet). The
approximate cost of the road trust would be $2tOOO ($20 a lineal foot. 1 DO-feet). The portion of the
sidewafk to be constructed shaU be located a minimum of 41-feet from the centerline of Pine Avenue.
5t
Construct vertical curb, guttert and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk abutting the site on Nola Road, as
proposed.
6
(/<..,.
6. Construct one driveway on Pine Avenue located in alignment with the driveway on the north side of
Pine Avenue. This alignment win place the driveway approximately 30Q-feet east of the intersection
of Pine Avenue and Locust Grove Road (measured near edge to near edge). Construct the driveway
as a curb-relurn type driveway. 40-feet in width. The driveway shall be paved its full width and at
reast 3D-feet into the site.
7. Close the existing shared driveway on Nola Road located 245-feet south of the north property line
with matching roadway improvements (I.e. vertical curb, gutter. and sidewalk)t if the driveway is
proposed to NOT be utilized.
8. Locate any new driveway on Nola Road a minimum of 50-feet from the intersection of Pine Avenue
and Nola Road (measured near edge to near edge).
9. Comply with aU Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
1 · Any exisling irrigation facUities shan be refocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. AU utiHty relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shan be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curbt gutter and sidewalk and any that may be da maged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387 ~6280 (with me
number) for details ~
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the Djstrices Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details~
5. AU desig n and construction shalt be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements~ Construction Services procedures and all
appljcable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein~ An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shan prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shalJ submit revised plans for staff approvafJ prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits)f which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction. use and property development shaU be in conformance with aU applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8, Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prjor to buHding construction in accordance with
Ordinance #200. also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. Jt is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the Iight-of...way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shan repair existing utHities damaged by the appricant. The applicant
shall be required to can OrGlJNE (1~800-342-1585) at Jeast two fuff business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of..way. The appUcant shaH contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387 ~6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or fiUed) are compromised during any phase of construction.
7
I"
~
1 0 r No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shari be valid unless they a re in writing and
signed by the appHcant or the applicanes authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shan be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County H ig hway District.
11. Any chang e by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
applicationf shan require the applicant to comply with aU rules. regulations~ ordinancesJ prans~ or other
regu~atory and legal restrictiQnsJn force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advlses
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the Jaw in effect at the
time the change in use is sought
E.. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if aU of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACH D requirements are intended to assure that the p reposed use/development win not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation syslem within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3~ Appeal Guidefines
8
/~.. ..
(
EXHIBIT D
Nola Subdivision
PFP-04-008
Required Findings
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS
Meridian City Code (MCC) 12-3-3 J..2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the
acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the
objectives of this title and at least the following:
A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Plan;
City Council finds tIle 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
designates all of tIle subject property as "Industrial~" The purpose of the Industria]
designation is "... to allow a range of industrial uses to sup.port industrial and
commercial activities and to develop with sufficient urban services. In light
industrial areas, uses may include warehouses, storage units, light manufacturing,
and incidental retail and offices uses. Heavy ind.ustrial areas may inclu.de
processing, manufacturing, warehouses, storage units, and industrial support
activities~ In all cases, standards for screening, landscaping, and adequate access
would be developed an.d implemented." (See Chapter VII, pg. 99.)
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed
development;
Locust Grove is currently included in ACHD's Five-Year Work Program (2007)
and Capital Improvements Plan (#80). Locust Grove is anticipated to be 5 lanes
froIn Franklin Road to Fairview A ven.ue with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike
lanes within 96-feet of right of way. The intersection of Locust Grove and Pine is
scheduled to be widened and signalized. with that same project
The subject site can be serviced by the City of Meridian's sanitary sewer and.
water systems. Sanitary sewer and water mains would have to be extended into
the site by the developer from East Pine Avenue.
On November 12, 2004, a joint agency/department comments Ineeting was held
with representatives of key service providers to tl1is property~ The Meridian Fire
Department is supportive of the subdivision. The ap.plicant should coordinate the
location and design of refuse container(s) with Sanitary Services COlnpany (SSC)~
Trash enclosures must be built in the location and to the size approved by sse.
All du.mpster(s) :must be screened in accordance with MCC 11-12-1.C.
(..... ... ~....
(: ....
City Council finds that the property proposed for developm.ent can be serviced by
essential public facilities and services.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
City Council finds that the subdivision will not conflict with the capital
improvement program because the developer is required to install sewer, water,
utilities and irrigation, for the development at their cost
D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
The developer will be financing the extension of sewer, water, utilities and
inigation services to serve the project The primary public costs to serve the
future site will be fire and police services. City Council finds that this
develop.ment will not cause excessive additional requirem.ents at public cost, if the
applicant complies with the conditions of approval for the and preliminary plat
application~
E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to
the Commission's attention.
ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis; ACHD staff has approved
this subdivision., with conditions. There are no l1ealth, safety, or environmental
pro.blems to bring to the Commission's attention
(.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISIO.N & ORDER
In the Matter of a request to Annex and Zone 15.94 acres from .RUT/C2 to C-G (General
Retail and Service Commercial), by Avest LP.
Case No(s): AZ-04-033
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 15,2005
A~ Filldings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts
a. A .notice of a pu.blic hearing was publislled for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
tIle City Council public hearing, tIle first publication appeari11g and written. notice
mailed to propel1y OWllers or purc.hasers of record witl1i.n tl1ree .hundred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the property. The 110tice of public hearing before the
City Council was posted upon the .property under consideration more than 0.11e week
before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with. Idaho Code 967-
6509.
The luatter was duly COllsidered by the City Co.uncil at the March 15, 2005, .public
hearil1g(s). The applicant, affected property OWllers, and govel1Unent su.bdivisiol1S
providing services witllin the plalUling jurisdictiol1 of tIle City of Meridian were
given full opportunity to express C01TIlnellts alld sublnit evidence.
b. Writtel1 and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records
of the City Clerk (for written testimollY) and. in tIle official Ineeting rnil1utes (for
oral testimony).
c. The Planl1illg and Zoning CO:Iulnission conducted a public hear.ing al1d issued a
written recolnlnel1dation on the subject lnatter to the City COUI1Cil.
d. TIle City COUllCil .heard and took oral and writtel1 testitTIony and duly considered the
evidence and t]le record in this Inatter.
2. Process Facts
a. T.here l1as been compliance with all notice and hearing requirelnents set forth in
Idallo Code ~67-6509, 6512, and .Meridial1 City Code ~~ 11-15...5 and 11-] 7-5 as
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit ofPu.blication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staffrepo11.
3. Application and Property Facts
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-033 - PAGE I Of 3
'"
\:...... ..
a. In addition to the application and pro.perty facts noted ill the staffre.port and the
Planning & Zoning Reco:lnmendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby
verified tllat the pro.perty owner(s) of record at tIle titne of issuance of these
fi.ndings are A vest Properties L.P, Kathlee.n Weber - General Partner.
4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
a. See Exllibit C for the findil1gs required for tllis application.
B.. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian s.hall exercise tIle powers cOl1fen4ed upon it by the "Local Land
Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idallo Code (I.C.. 967-
6503).
2. TIle Meridian City Council takes judicial 110tice of its Zo.ning, Su.bdivision alld
.Developl11el1t Ordinances codified at Titles II alld 12, :Meridian City Code, and all
current zoning maps tllereof. The City of Meridian .has, by ordil1ance, established the
Ilnpact Area and the Amended Cornprellensive Plan of the City of Meridian, whic.h was
ad.opted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The cOlld.itions shall be reviewable by the City Council :p.ursual1t to Meridian City Code
S 11-1 7 -9.
4. Due consideration l1as been given to th.e comluent(s) received fr01TI tIle govemtnel1ta]
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian .plal1nil1g jurisdictiol1.
5~ It is fOUl1d public facilities atld services required .by the proposed development will not
ilnpose expense u.pon th.e public if tIle attached conditiollS of approval are ilnposed.
6. That tIle City l1as granted an order of approval ill accord.al1ce wittl t11is Decisiol1, wl1icl1
sllall be sigl1ed .by tIle Mayor and City Cle.rk al1d tIlen a copy served by the Clerk upon
tIle applicant, the Planning and ZOlling Departlnent, the Public Works Departlnent and
any affected party requesting 11otice.
7. Tllat this approval is subject to tIle Legal DescriptiollS ill Exllibit A, and tIle Alll1exatiol1
al1d Z011ing COIDlnents in Exllibit B~ The conditions are co.ncluded to be reasonable alld
tIle applicant sllall1neet SUCll requirements as a cO.lldition of approval of the application.
c. Decisio.n and Order
Pursuant to th.e City Council's autl10rity as provided in Meridian City Code S 12-3-5 and
based .upon tIle above alld foregoing Findings of Fact whicl1 are l1erein adopted, it is
l1ereby ordered tllat:
1. TIle AlIDexatiol1 al1d Zoning COlTIlnel1ts are as sllown in Exhibit B~
D~ Exllibits
CITY OF MER1DIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-033 - PAGE 2 of3
(.. .
f~~:...
\\... '.
Exhibit A: Legal Descriptions
:Exhibit B: Arulexatio11 and Zoning C01TIlnents
Exhibit C: Zoning Amendlnel1t Findings
By action of the City Council at its regular Ineeting l1eld on tIle I fit?::: day of
111. U{/1 of,. -" , 2005.
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL M.EMBER CHRISTIN,E DONNELL
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
COUNCIL M:EMBER I(EITH .BIRD
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
Attest
and City Attorney.
1
By: \
''eriy Clerk's Office
Dated: (~, \ X ~ OS
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AN.D DECISION & OR.DER
CASE NO(S). AZ-04-033 - PAGE 3 of3
t, .
t.:.... .
\^
EXHIBIT A
Stor-it
AZ-04-033
Legal Description
NOVenlfJcr 9 ~ 2Q(J4
}lagc 1 of 2
EXHIBJT ~.l\"
ANNEXt-\TJON PROPE.RTY BOUNDARY
A tract of land being an ofP;iuc,cl A as shown on Record of Survey No. 5576 fnstnuncnt No,
lOT [Og209~ said parcel being described in \Varranly Deed Instrument No- 101 I 1551 L Ada County
Records~ together \vith a ponion of the Union P~cjfic Railroad Righl-of..\VuYt all being situated in
tbe SE ~!"' of Section JO~ To\vnship 3 North, Range I Weslt BOlse Meridian, Ada County~ Idaho~
said tract being more parhcularly described as follows~
Conunencing at the Southeast comer of said SectIon I O~ thence along lhe Ea..~l hne of said Sect"ion1
being the centerline ofTen Mile Road~ North OOD27'06H East I 096,83 feet to a 518~' rcbar and cap
[Harking the southeast cOiner of said Purcel "~A ~t said point being the POINT OF BECrNNING;
thence leaving said East line along the South line o[sald Parcel '"'AH
North 88051 ~50H \Vcst 1545.36 feet; thence leaving said South line
North 01008' I O'~ E~lSl450.00 feet to a point on lhe South line of the Union PaciHc Railroad Right~
o f- \V (lY~ tllCI1CC
North OIt)081IOH East 200.00 feet, to the North line of said Righl-of..\Vay, thence along said .North
Ii 11 e
South 88051 ~50'?, East 1537.60 feet to the said Rust hne of said Section 1 O~ thence along said East
I ill e
South OOo27~06n \Vcsl 200.0 I to a point on the said Soulh hnc of the Unlon Pacific Railroad Right-
of~ \Vay~ thence continuing along said East line
South Ooc27'06'~ WCSl450J)) feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said tract contains 23.00 acres,. Hlore or less~ being 15-94 acres of said "Parcel A and 7.06 acres of
said lfnion Pacific Railroad Righl-of- W ny.
NOV 2.J 200t!
I.
REV 'w APPROVAt.. ').-. \
8'1. . --- f l:") I ----
t~~E F!~rHAN PUBLIC
VJO P;K 5 OEPT
(.~,...
-I'ij;I.~
~~
...... ~
W l:lll; ...e...~.r:...H'J' J: ~ ~.u n:~
~ ...........
..~ ......J
. . . : /~..........<::.~~:
,.~ ~~.~
~ .
~.j t ~ ~ ~ ~ ...L 1.. T ".. ~.., I ~.. I; 1":] 1 t 1. l "I"l. t . J:. f l I I. ~_.J::.~. 1 t -::-. f. J t !. 1 .LL..t:..:r. ~. 1.:r..t. t .I t .l: .:1: 1:: l::-LL.W:~::::..:r.l ~ .l: t 1. J:.L 1 l.:...Lr,.1".... l.uT-I' ~ ~ ~ :[ t .1. I I
~
L~.. -n.@~~~D--~.~. ~~~. -.~-~. ~ _~_." -u _~ __ _ _ _.. ______ _ n. _'. _____. _.. _.w__
~E[J I 5 2005
f. . J t ~. t) 1.. ,\J.r HIDIA~f
H~-\1N"};o.;G &. Z01\lNG
H
....---.~~.........- ~--'-."'...~--.-...-.-~........... .......
........~. --~
[" .
\. ..
(:.. . .
EXHI.BIT B
Stor-It
AZ-04-033
Annexation and Zoning Comments
ANNEXATION AN:O ZONING COMMENTS
1 ~ The legal description sublnitted witll tIle application meets tIle requirements of tIle
City of Meridian and State Tax Cornluissiol1 and :places the parcel COlltiguous to
existil1g city limits~
2~ Th.e subject property is witllil1 the Urban Service Planning Area~ Essential City
services can be Inad.e available to tIle subject .property.
3. All future development 011 sa:id property sIlaII comply with the City of Meridiall
ordinal1ces in effect at the tilue of application.
4. Any existing dOlnestic wells and/or septic systelTIS witllil1 tllis project wil111ave to be
relnoved froIn tlleir domestic service, .per City Ordinallce Section 5-7-517, when
services are availa.ble froln tIle City of Meridia.n~ Wells nlay .be used for nOll~
dOlnestic purposes SUCll as lalldscape irrigation.
5.. Prior to tIle annexatiol1 ordinallce approval, a Developtnent Agreelnent (.DA) sllall .be
el1tered il1tO betweel1 the City of Meridian, property owner (at the tiIne of anl1exation
ordil1ance adoptioll), and the developer. TIle applicant shall COlltact tIle City Attorney,
Bill Nary~ at 888-4433 to initiate this process. The DA sl1a11 il1corporate tIle
followitlg:
· Ten .Mile road is wit11il1 ACHD's Five Year Work Plan al1d right of way will be
required to complete the goals as set fortll by ACHD~ Staff is recolnmendi.ng tl1at
tIle applicant ded.icate the rigl1t of way as set forth by ACHD as a condition. of tIle
developlnent agreelnent.
· Prior to issuance of any buildin.g pennit or Certificate of Zoning COln.pliance 011
the subject property, the site sIlall be reviewed for cOln:pliallce Wit}l the Meridian
City Code for latldscaping, parking and setback requirel11el1ts.
· Prior to issuance of any building permit or Celtificate of Zoning COlu.pliance on
tIle su.bject property, the required right of way sIlalI .be d.edicated to ACHD~
· The City of Meridian's COlnprehensive Plan requires a multi-use patllway alollg
Ten Mile Creek, .provided at tIle oWller's ex:pel1se and. in coo:peration with the
City of Meridian Park and Recreation~ Therefore, tIle applicant sllall construct a
ten-foot lTIulti-use patllway to Parks Departlnellt standards as set forth in tIle
August 2003 Co~n.prellensive Parks al1d Recreation SystelTI Plan, .pgs~ 3-2 al1d 3-
3, sections .B & c~ The applicant shall obtain an easelnel1t or agreelnent witIl the
(.... ...:
<::'_.U
Nampa Meridian Irrigation District for tIle appropriate access requirelnents on the
west side of Ten Mile Creek.
MERlDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS (AZ-04-033)
The Meridian Fire Department provided agency COffilnents on Dece.lnber 17, 2004. In
particular, they noted the following specific concerns:
2. Any roadway greater than 150' in length that is 110t provided witll all outlet shall
be required to have an approved tu.rn around.
3. All entrance and internal roads sllall .have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside.
4. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are lnaintained. free of cOlubustible
vegetation.
5. Operational fire hydrants and tel11porary or pennanent street signs are required
.before combustible construction begins.
6. TIle roadways shall be .bu.ilt to Ada County :Highway Standards and sllall have a
clear driving surface, available at all tilues, Wl1ich is 20' wide. Streets wit11 less
than a 29' street widtll shall have no parkil1g. Streets with less than 33' shall have
.parking only on one side.
8. COlTIlnercia] and office occupancies will req.uire a fire-flow consistellt with tIle
Ul1ifOllTI .Fire Code to service tIle pro.posed project. .Fire hydrants shall be placed
an average of300' a.part.
11 " Provide a Knox.box entry systeln for tIle cOlnplex.
12~ All .processes & storage practices sIlaII be required to comply with the International
Fire Code.
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY COMMENTS
1. Design the enclosure(s) per the standard reCOlTIlne.ndations of sse for access,
gates, floor/pad, contail1er stopslb.umpers, and d.ilnensions. Coordil1ate the
location and design wit}l sse. Approval of the trash enclosure design will be
required plior to issuallce of a Certificate of Zoning COlnpliance for the project.
MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. Patllway and Trail standards: The proposed patl1way and/or trail shall meet tIle
standards as set fortl1 ill the August 2003 Comprellensive Parks and Recreation
Systeln Plan, .pgs. 3-2 and 3-3, sections B & C.
('
2. Standard for City to assume Maintenance of a section of Pathway: The pathway
must connect from one major arten.a] to another, and either an easemel1t or
ownership deed lTIUst be granted before the city will aSSUlne the maintenan.ce of
any section of pathwaY4
(
EXHIBIT C
Stor-It -A vest, LP
AZ-04-033
Zoning Amendment Findings
ANNEXATION AND ZONING. FINDINGS
The legal description sublnitted with the application meets tIle requirelne.nts of the City of
Meridian al1d State Tax COlnlnission~ The subject property is with.in. tIle U'rban Service
Planning Area.
Because there are existing commercial uses on tllis site, staff has cOlnbined tIle analysis
of.use with tIle arulexation and zonil1g findings.
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning
Aluendlnel1ts, both the P&Z Commission and Council are reqllired "to review the
particular facts and cirC~lmstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the
following standards and shallfind adequate evidence answering thefollowing questions
about the proposed zoning amendment jj
The following is the list of standards found in .1 ] -15- J 1 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Co.mprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
T:he 2002 COlnprehensive Plan Future Lalld Use Map designates tIle subject
property as "Mixed Use - Regiollal". III Chapter VII of the COlnprellensive Plall,
"Mixed .Use - RegiollaI" areas are anticipated to provide a l1igher density
residential uses, greater than 200,000 sq ft 11011-resid.ential b.uilding areas, limited
Conditional Use pennits. Uses Inay il1clude major elnployers, entertainment, and
clean industry~ Staff finds that the requested C-G zonin.g gellerally confonns to
this stated purpose and intellt of tIle Mixed Use - Regio.nal designation.
T.he conceptual plan for tIle property does not pro.pose a tnix of .uses~ However,
this is a relatively sInall pro.perty, al1d it Inay only be feasible to develop witll a
sil1g1e use. Staff al1ticipates that the property immediately south of the subject
property will be develo.ped with a churc.h; the COluprehellsive Plan designates tIle
property to tIle west as Multi-fatuily residel1tial. Tllis would bring a Inix of uses to
th.e general area.
Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action itelns contained in tIle
2002 Comprel1ensive Plan to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in
italics below policy):
(:._.. :
· "Restrict curb euts and access points on collectors and arterial streets~"
(Cl1apter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 2)
One curb etl! on Ten Mile Road exists and no new curb cutes are .planned~
· "Require approp.riate landscape and buffers along transportation corridors
(setback, vegetatioll, low walls, benns, etc.)." (Cha.pter VII, Goal IV,
Objective D, Actio.n item 4)
The Applicant has not addressed landscaping adjacent to the existin,g uses
that are to remain on-site. A CHD has stated that its future right of way
acquisition width on .Ten Mile Road will be 45-feet on each side of the
centerline (90 feet total) for building setbacks and to include a frontage road.
The general requirements of A CHD would not be in compliance with the
existing use and WOltld require compliance t€pon approval of a detailed site
plan and/or Sllbdivision and/or conditionalllse permit issuance~
Stafffinds that the existing building setbaclcs, landscaping, and the potential
for right-af-way acqllisition create a unique situationfor the site. In order to
mitigate anticipated problelns, staff recommends that the City enter into a
development agreement with the Applicant.
· "Pel1uit new · · .commercial developlnent only w11ere urban services can .be
reasonably provided at tIle tilue of final approval and develo.pment is
contiguous to the City." (Chapter IV, Goal I, Objective A, Actio!l itelTI 6)
The Meridian Fire Department comments are based on the conceptual site
plan indicating a single use of indoor storage facilities. One of the comments
received fi-.om the Fire Department states that the new bridge and potential fot'
multiple btlildings creates several items of concernA The Meridian Fire
Department reqtlires specific turning radillses between buildings, two pOil'ltS
of access, weight requirenlents for the bridge, and water flow to be
established prior to iSStlance of any building pernlit or certificate of zoning
compliance.
Public Wor/(S will submit a separate memo related to this finding discussing
the availability of sanitary sevver and lvater systemsA
· "Locate new cOlnmunity COIUl11 erci al areas on a11erials or collectors near
residential areas in SUCll a way as to cOlnplement with adjoining residential
areas." (Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective B, Action itelTI 5)
The subject property has frontage on a designated collector Ten Mile Road.
The existing uses adjacent to this site have not yet developed to the e.--rpected
(.. .
{ .
.~\.~.
residential densities or Commercial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive
Plan.
The existing area will be complemented by the 'uses of a Church to the SOl-lth
of the property and varying residential densities in the immediate vicinity to
the north and west of the site. The comprehensive plan designation to the
west of the site is high density residential and medillm density residential to
the north of the siteA The applicant has indicated a lvorlcing relationship vvith
the property owner to provide storage for a proposed apartment complex and
to have a secondary access to the west to provide for' thru flow of emergency
vehicular traffiC6 The anticipated residential densities for the general vicinity
would be expected to tltilize the storage facilities and other mixed conlfflercial
uses within the similar comprehensive plan designation.
· "Plan for a variety of COfilmercial and retail opportunities within the .Impact Area.n (Chapter
.VII, Goall, Objective .B)
The proposed and existing indoor storage facilities are the only storage facilities in the
general vicinity. It is expected that a variety of cOlnnlercial and residential uses lvould utilize
the site lvith Cl nux of injill conllllercial sites and a valying of densities in the residential
developnlents.
· "Require all COlTIlnercial busil1esses to il1stall and Inaintain lal1dscaping."
(Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action item 5)
The Applicant has not addressed the reqtlirement to install landscaping
adjacent to the existing indoor storage facilitiesA Prior to issuance of any
building permit or certificate of zoning compliance the applicant shall provide
a landscape .plan and install the required landscaping in conformance lvith
MCC Title 12 Chapter 13~
· "Multi-use off street patllways are to be located alol1g, natural drains/creeks
and canals~. ~ the UPRR railroad cOITidoI'." (Chapter VI, Figure VI-3)
.Figure VI-3 on page 55 of the Comprehensive Plan designates a multi-llse
pathway on Ten Mile Creek which bisects the site. The Applicant has not
addressed the iSSlles of a pathway on the site., however as residential
developnlents to th,e north of the site will be extending the pathway on the
North side of the UPRR Right of 11lay the pathlvay will be required to connect
through the site on the west side of Ten Mile Creek according to the design
standards for pathways as listed in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Parks
and Recreation System Plan.
· "2~ Idel1tify feasible il1tercOlmected greenbelt areas along waterways.. 46
Develop alld Inail1tain greenbelt areas a]ong wate.IWays 11. To ilnprove and
protect creeks (Ten lnile) tllroughout COlTIlnerciaI, industrial, and residential
areas." (Cllapter V A.l D)
c.
The participation in the multi use pathway shall satisfy the goals and policies
of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan improving the watenvay and providing
the req'uired interconnectivity to the multitlSe pathway system.
· "Consider "Accomlnodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommend.ed
A.p.proach" frOlTI the Natio.nal Center for Bicyclillg and Walking in all1ao.d use
decisions." (Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action item 3)
This publication enCOtlrages jurisdictions to establish bik:eway and wal/cway
facilities in new constrllction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is
safe, accessible and convenient. The detailed site plan must address these
issues.
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
Staff does not anticipate tl1at the Applicant intel1ds to rezone the subject .pro.petty
in the future~
c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning - for example, a
residential area turning into commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Inside Storage Facilitates are principally permitted uses in the C-G zone~
Residential uses are prollibited in the C-G Z011e~ T.he existing business would .be
principally allowed in a C-G zone~ The purpose of tIle C-G District is to l)fovide
for COlTIlnercial uses, Wl1icll are custoluarily operated entirely or ahnost entirely
with-ill a .building (MCC 11-7-2~K). Staff fillds that the proposed uses would
conform to the proposed zoning~
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. .For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being d.eveloped
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Chesterfield Subdivision .has recently been all11exed and developed witll
residential uses illllnediately l10rtll of the site. Tllere are several cOlulnerciaI and
l1igh density residential developments in the area th.at would cOlnplement tIle site.
The COlnlnission and Coul1cil should rely on tJle preceding facts and allY public
testilllony to detennine whether tIle changes in the area dictate that this area
s.hould be anl1exed into the City and zoned C-G at this tilne~
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmoniou.s and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
(
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed C-G zone with the proposed retail uses if designed,
constructed and operated in. accordance with adopted city ordinances, sllould be
harmonious and appropriate in appearance witl1 tIle intended character of the
vicinity~ TIle site is intended to .be used for COffitnercia] .uses whic.h, based on the
COlnprellensive Plan descri.ption, will l1ave such uses as retai.l, wholesale, service
and office uses, lTIulti-family residential, as well as appropriate public uses su.ch
as govemlnent offices. The existillg uses do not cOllfonn to the hannonious and
appropriate ap.pearance of tIle existing gen.eraI vicil1ity and would be required
upo.n redevelopment to cOl1form to these goals and policies.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The existing uses on tIle site are l1azardous to neig.hboring uses~ Accessory to t]le
existing businesses, there are cllemicals, gasoline, and assorted autolTIobile wastes
stored on this site. Ap:propriate buffers should be required on the nort.h and. east
boundaries of this developlnent, as the abutting uses are less-intense than the
.proposed and existillg uses (see MCC 12-13-12-4). TIle COITIlnission and Council
s110uld rely on .p.ublic testilTIOl1Y to detennine wl1ether the proposed uses will be
disturbing or hazardous to the neighboring uses~
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, ,vater, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds tllat the proposed roadway ilnprovelnents to Ten Mile Road should be
ac1alowledged with the detailed site plan for the .project. III tIle short tenn tIle
existing access and. frontage are satisfactory for the site. T.his site .has over 500
feet of frontage on Ten Mile Road~ Based on future d.eveloptnent applications
staff is conditioning tl1at the A.pplicant enter il1tO a development agreelnent witll
tIle City to require im.provelnents (landscaping, sidewalk, lTIulti-use pathway, road
widenillg, tUfl1-lalle, etc.) to Ten Mile Road, subject to ACH:O requirements, witll
site-specific standards conditions to be Inet in accordal1ce witll ap.provaI of the
subject developtne.nt.
On Deceluber 17, 2004, a joint agency/departlnellt COlTIlnents Ineeting was lleld
witll representatives of key service providers to this pro.perty~ The Meridian :Fire
Departlnent has concerns with serviceability of this site, as it contains several
req.uired turns around buildings to Ineet standards for serv.ice~ Because tIle
applicant 113S not id.el1tified. all future buildings within tllis developlnellt, such
(' . . ~
~\.' .'
buildings will be subject to furth.er reVIew and cotnments by Meridian Fire
Department
The Commission and Council should reference any written or verbal testilTIOny
suhlnitted by the Meridian Police Department, and any other agency 110t listed
above, regarding tlleir ability to adequately service this project.
Staff finds that the property proposed for an.nexation call be served adequately.by
all essential public facilities and services as co.nditioned.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and ,viII not be detrimental to the economic lvelfare of
the community;
If this atmexation/development is approved, the developer will be financing the
extensio.n of sewer, water, local/internal street infrastructure, utilities alld
irrigation services to serve tIle project The prilnary public costs to serve the
future site will be fire and police services~ Staff fi.nds that this developlnent will
110t cause excessive additional requirelnents at public cost.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operati.on that will be detrim.ental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that tIle ind.oor storage facilities involve activ:ities, processes, materials,
equip.lUel1t or conditiollS fIlat could produce excessive traffic, .noise, fulnes a11d/or
odors, as well as otIler negative public ilTI.pacts.. A key qu.estiol1 that sllould be
discussed at the public .llearing is w.hether tIle ilnpacts will be "excessive." .MCC
11-12-2 and 11-12-3 are illte.nded to luitigate jIn.pacts of special uses su.ch as fire
hazards, bulk storage, noises. Staff does not allticipate tIle iln:pacts of the site to
exceed tIle standards as set fortl1 by MCC 11-12-2 and 11-12-3 based 011 cun-ent
o.peratillg COllditions.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shaD be so
designed as not to create an interference \vith traffic on surrounding public
s t.ree ts ;
Staff finds that any future uses may itnpact tIle level and flow of traffic on tl1e
surrounding roadways. TIle site has Olle access point to Ten Mile Road al1d future
developmel1t sho.uld be designed as to provide COl1tiguous traffic flow to adjoining
properties~
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
;.
g
\.: . .
(:.:"^:. . ,
Stafffinds that tl1e Ten Mile Creek is a sigllificant natural feature that should be
protected through standard stonnwater and run-off lnanageluent practices. Staff is
not aware of allY other natural, scenic or historical feature(s) of major iIn.portance
in the area tllat may be affected by the proposed developlne.nt. Staff finds the
COlnmission and Council sho.uld rely on any public testilTIOny that Inay be
.presented to detennine whether the proposed use may cause health, safety or
envirorun.ental proble.ms of which staff is unaware.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the annexation and zoning of this property as mitigated through a
development agreement may be in the best interest of the City.for the folloyving
reasons~~
· municipal sanitary sewer and water systelTIS are readily available to pro.vide
service;
· the proposed use luay involve act.ivities, processes, materials, equiplnent
and/or conditions that will produce additiol1al traffic, noise, fiunes alld/or
odors, as well as other negative public itnpacts that ca.n be mitigated throug.h
develo.pment of the site;
· the existin.g uses t]lat are to relnain, signage, lan.dscapillg, public infrastructure
(sidewalk, bike lanes), screenil1g, drive-aisles, or parkin.g, are to be broug.ht
into cOlnpliance witll CUITent City Code upon developluel1t of the site;
For the reasons listed in the findings above, Citv Council finds that the annexing
and zoning of this vropertv would be in the best interest of the Citv.
(-...
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C March 15,2005
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF PRIMELAND )
DEVELOPMENT, LLP FOR FINAL )
PLAT APPROVAL OF 50 SINGLE- )
FAMILY RESIDENTIA:L BUILDING )
LOTS AND 9 COMMON LOTS ON )
23.71 ACRES IN AN R-4 ZONE )
LOCATED WEST OF NORTH AND )
SOUTH OF WEST MCMILLAN )
ROAD IN LOCATED IN THE ~ OF )
SECTION T. 4N., R. lW., SECTION )
35. )
)
CASE NO. FP-05-016
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
Tllis matter coming before tIle City Council for Final :Plat ap.provaI pursuant to
Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on March 15,2005, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works
D~partment, dated: Hearing Date: March 15, 2005, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of"PLA T SHOWING BRIDGETOWER CROSSING SUBDNISION
NO. 11, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005,
HANDWRITTEN DATE: 02-09-05, SHEET 1 OF 2, ENGINEERING
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL A.PP.ROV AL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BRIDGETOWER CROSSING SUBDIVISION NO. 11/ (FP-OS-O 16)
page 1 Of 4
(
SOLUTIONS, LLP, EAGLE, IDAHO", PRIMELAND DEVELOPMENT, LLP,
MERIDIAN, IDAHO, Developer, is Conditionally Approved su.bject to those
conditions ofStaffcolTIln.ents as set forth in the Memorandul11 to the Mayor and. City
Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Plaru1ing and Zoning
De.partment and Bruce Freckleton, Developlnent Services Manager for the Public
Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: March 15, 2005, listing 17 SITE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 7 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS,
a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and
consisting of 4 .pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and tIle response
letter from Engineering Solutions, LLP, a true and correct co.py of which is attached
hereto marked Exllibit "B" and consisting of 2 pages, and by this reference
incorporated herein, and the additional requirements froln the action of the Council
taken at their MarcIl 15, 2005 .meeting as follows, to-wit
1.1 Adopt the Recommendation of the Central
District Health Department as follows:
The Central District Health requires after
written approval from the appropriate entities
are submitted, they can approve tllis proposal
for central sewage and central water; that
plans must be submitted to and ap.proved by
the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality for central
sewage and central water; that run-offis not to
create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is
suggested that the stormwater be pretreated
through a grassy swale prior to discharge to
the subsurface to prevent impact to
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BRIDGETOWER C.ROSSING SUBDIVISION NO. 11/ (FP-OS-016)
page 2 Of 4
( .
(7":......
groundwater and surface water quality; that
engineers and architects should obtain current
best management practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater manageme.nt
system that is preventing ground water and
surface water degradation~ Manuals for
guidance:
1. State of Idaho Catalog of Stonnwater Best
Management Practices for Idaho Cities and
Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of
El1vironmental Quality, July 1997~
2. Stormwater Best Mallagement Practices
Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public
Works Departlnent, May 2000~
2~ The final plat upon whicl1 there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and tIle City Engineer verifying that the plat :meets the City's requirem.e.nts shall
be signed only at such time as:
1 ~ The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. TIle City Engineer has verified that all off-site itnprovements are completed
and/or tIle appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
com.pletion of off-site and required on-site improvements~
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The A.p.p Iicant is l1ereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67 -8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in. writing, and must be filed witl1 the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue~ A
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BRIDGETOWER CROSSING SUBDIVISION NO. 11/ (FP-OS-016)
page 3 of4
(
/:.
(
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period witllin which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code ~ 67 -6521. An affected :person being a person WI10 has an interest
in real property Wllicl1 may be ad.versely affected by this decision may, within twen.ty-eight (28) days
after tIle date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held. on the \5~ day
of (h(l r~ h
, 2005.
Attest:
By: ,Gt ~
City Clerk's Office
Dated: 4 .- \4 -0:;
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR BRIDGETOWE.R CROSSING SUBDIVISION NO. 11/ (FP-OS-O 16)
page 4 Of 4
(.
j
:f
MAYOR
TalTIlny de Weerd
.
Ian
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898M5500 · Fax (208)898-9551
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Kei tll Bird
CllriStillC Domlell
S}luun Wardle
Charles M. Rountl~e
lO,.\HO
.'t
"
"
\1
...~
iT
.p!"
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 · FAX 888-6854
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
To:
Mayor & City Co.uncil
JIl
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Plannel
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
From:
Re:
Request for a Final Plat Approval of Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision No. 11
Consisting of Fifty (50) Building Lots and Nine (9) Common Lots on 23.71 Acres
in an R-4 Zone by Primeland Development, LLP (File# FP-05-016)
We have reviewed. this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Primeland .Development, LLP, :has applied. for final plat approval of the eleventl1
phase of Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision~ This phase includes 47 single-falnily residential
building lots, 3 cOIn.mercial office lots, and 9 commO.ll lots on 23.71 acres.
This .phase is located on the west side of N. Linder Road., approximately 'l4 mile santIl of W.
McMillan Road in the NE ~ of Section 35, T.4N~, R.l W~
The subdi vision is located in an R -4 zone and has been approved as a planned development. The
minimu.ID house size within the subdivision is 1,400 square feet, excluding the garage. The
.Preliminary Plat was approved under the name of Bridgetower Crossing :East Subdivision. The
approved Planned Development (CUP) allowed for increased block lengths and a reduction in
street frontage to 69-feet for single family residential lots in this subdivision.
The co.mmon area lots within the su.bdivision co.nsist of landscape, open space, and drainage lots,
and will be maintained by tIle Bridgetower Crossing Homeowners Association. The pressurized
irrigation system within t]lis development is to be owned and maintained .by the Bridgetower
Crossing and Verona Homeowners Associations.
TIle proposed final plat substantially conlplies witll the approved preliminary .plat.
Staff recommends approval of Bridgetower Crossing Su.bdivision No. 11 with the conunents and
conditions stated in this re.port.
FP -05-0 I 6
Exllibit "A"
Bridgetower crOSSing SUb 11 FP .doc
\..... .
(-..
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
Page 2
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of tIle approved Preliminary Plat (PP-02-014), Conditional
Use Permit (CU.P-OI-006) and Developm.ent Agreement (Inst. N.o. 101117652).
2. The Developer s]lalI be responsible for paytnent of water assessment fees for any
COIDluon areas proposing to use City water as a backup irrigatio.n source. Ap.plicant l1as
indicated th.e Creason Lateral will be used as the .primary source, with Five Mile Cree.k
providing the backup source of water.
3. Street signs are to be in place, water systelTI s.hall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed., and
road. .base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for .building
.permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to
obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of
110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer,
water, etc., prior to signature on tIle final .plat.
4. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains installed
adjacent to the pro:posed subdivision. Water service s.hall be via extensions from existing
mains installed adjacent to the :proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to
construct the sewer and water mains to and througIl this proposed develo:pment.
Su.bdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Pu.blic Works
:Department.
5. Underground pressurized irrigation lTIUst be provided to all landscape areas on site.
Applicant has indicated that the pressurized. irrigation system within this develo.pment is
to .be owned and mailltained by th.e HOlneowner's Association. Since the system is being
:proposed as a pri.vate system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be
reviewed by the Publi.c Warks Department as part of tIle development plan review
process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be
submitted prior to plan approval.
6. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works
Departm.ent for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed
to ensure that water is retained only during lOO-year storm events, and for a period of
time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall .not exceed 3:1. Any
portion of a drainage area not improved with sod/grass seed (or otller approved
landscaping) shall not count towards the required open space area. The project engineer
should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil
type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall
be required to certify tllat the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet
above the l1ighest established. normal groundwater elevation.
7. Fencing along micropaths shall be consistent with existing micropath fencing approved in
.previous phases of Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision. The developer shall place a deed
restriction on the residential building lots adjacent to tIle micropath lots to prohibit the
FP-OS-O 16 EXhibit ~~A" Bridgetower crOSSing SUb II FPodoc
(~.-'H. )
-::~.......... .
{ .
t",.. ..
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March. 15,2005
Page 3
construction of any solid fencing higIler than four feet on the sides adjacent to the
.pedestrian walkway lot per condition of the Preliminary Plat (Findings of .Fact al1d
Conclusions of Law No. 49E., page 7-8).
Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed along the northern
boundary of the comln.ercial phase unless fencing already exists at the northern
subdivision boundary.
All fencing shall be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10.
89 The Landscape Plan prepared by Harvest Design, dated 2/4/05 shall be revised as
follows:
a. Storm drainage ponds shall be seeded in the bottom, sand is not allowed. Storm
drainage facilities nlust be in compliance with MCC 12-13-14-2~
9. Please add or revise the following plat notes:
(14.) Strike note~ Setbacks are no longer required to be shown on plat
10. Applicant shall be required to pay Pu.blic Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final.pIat per Resolution 02-374~
11. All drainage areas (detention/retention .basins) must be d.esigned to ensure tllat water will
percolate or discharge witl1in a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storIns up to
and including a ] aD-year storm event Side slo.pes within drainage areas .m.ust be less
tllan 3: 1 for accessibility and maintenance. Storm drainage facilities must be in
compliance with MCC 12-13-14-2.
12~ Submit "Final" letter froIn the Ada County Street Name Committee, ap.proving the
subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform.
13 ~ Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
14. Complete the Certificate of Owners and its accompanying Acknowled.gement.
15. A.pplicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404
Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
16. Applicant sIlall be responsible for application and complian.ce with and NPDES
Permitting tllat Inay be required by the Environmental Protectio.n Agency~
17 ~ Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved Preliminary
Plat, Conditional Use Permit or Development Agreement does not relieve Applicant of
responsibility for compliance4
FP -05-0 I 6
Exlli bi t "A"
Bridgetower crOSSing SUb 11 FP odoc
(.....
""( "" "
Mayor & City Council
Hearil1g Date: March 15,2005
Page 4
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All irrigation ditclles, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersectin.g,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will :need to be approved by the ap.propliate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owner's), witl1 written.
approval or nan.-approval submitted to the Public Works De.partment. If lateral users
association approval can't .be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the
meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
relTIoved froIn tlleir domestic service :per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landsca.pe irrigation.
3~ 250 and I DO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense~ Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and q.uantity are detennined after :power designs are cOlnpleted. by
Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor to obtain design and pennit from the
Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
4. Compaction test results lTIUst be submitted to the Meridian Building Departlnent for all
lots receiving engineered backfill.
5~ Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying
that all street fil1ish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the
l1ighest establis.hed normal ground.water elevation.
6. Coordinate fire hydrant placelnent with the City of Meridian's Water .Works
Superintendent.
7. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2~K~
Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment
of mailbox structures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final .plat for Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision No. 10 with
the above stated comments & conditions.
FP-OS-O 16
EXhibit "A~'
Bridgetower crOSSing SUb 11 FP .doc
MGINEERING
planrjng and engineering comlilmiUes lor the {muIs
OLUTIONSLLP
150 Ea~t Aikens Street.. Suite B
EagJc~ ID 83616
Phone: (208) 938-0980
Fax: (208) 938-0941
E-ulail: es-beckynl@qwcst.net
March t 1 'I 2005
Mayor and City Council
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, 10 83642
Re: Bridgeto\ver Crossing Subdivision No. 11 (Final Plat)
File No. FP-05-016
Dear Mayor and Council:
We have reviewed staff comments for tile hearing date of March ] 5, 2005, and have the
following responses:
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
I. The applicant will meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat (PP-012-014)~
conditional use permit (CUP-OJ -006) and developtTIcnt agreenlent (Inst.. No~ (01117652).
2. The applicant will comply.
3.. The applicant will comply_
4. The applicant will comply.
5~ The applicant will comply_
6. The applicant will comply.
7 · A note will be added to the face of the plat to address the fencing height.
8. The developer met at the site with staff and ~~da Count)r High,vay District.
Problems lvith the high ,vater table \vere discussed.. The general consensus of the
meeting ,vas that sand utilization for the basins is the best alternative; seeding
\vould be \vashed out audIo.. vegetation \vould rot.. The developer ,yilt coordinate
\vith staff to provide an acceptable design of these drainage areas.
9 ~ The plat note \vill he deleted.
1 0.. The applicant \vilI comply.
C;~DoCUml'ltS and SettingS' EngincLnng Sot.Local Seuin,g:-- T ,;mpurary Inl~1 Ild rik~ OlK 7tJ R..:csRt.~ponSt:.d(Jc
J:Xllibil ul It.
(.
Mayor and City Council
March 1 ], 2005
Page 2
II.. The applicant \vill work with staff to provide an acceptable landscape design of these
drainage areas. (SEE RESPONSE TO ITE1\118 ABOVE.)
] 2.. The applicant will comply.
13. The applicant \viII comply..
14. The applicant will comply.
15. The applicant win comply.
16. The applicant will comply.
17. Noted.
GENERAL REOUIREl\1ENTS
1.. The applicant will comply.
2.. l;he applicant will comply..
3. The applicant will comply.
4. The applicant will comply..
5. The applicant \vill comply.
6. The applicant will comply.
7. The applicant \vill comply with City ordinance for side\valk construction; detached
side\valks may be four feet lvide.
We believe this letter addresses all of your concerns. Please feel free to call me if you have
additional COffilnents or questions.
Sincerely,
Engineering Solutions, LLP
Becky McKay, Partner
Project Manager
BM:ss
cc: Mr. Frank Varriale
C:'..DocUmt~lL"; anti Scuings\Engin~t:ting. Sol~ LOC"dl Settings\ T empom~tc1Bt"es'OLK79~ R..:cs Rcspu nsc. dOC
I ~xhihit ull tl
c:,n.:..
C...: .
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C March 15, 2005
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
A.PPLICATION OF BRIGHTON )
DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR FINAL )
PLAT APPROVAL OF 2 OFFICE )
BUILDINGLOTS ON 2.44 ACRES IN )
AN R-8 ZONE LOCATED WEST OF )
LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND )
NORTH OF USTICK ROAD IN THE )
NE ~ OF THE SE 'l;I T. 4N., R. IE., )
SECTION 31 )
)
)
)
CASE NO. FP-05-015
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
Tllis luatter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on March 15,2005, and the Council finding that the Administrative
Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Developlne.nt Services Manager for the Public Works
:Department, dated: Hearing Date: March 15, 2005, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Coun.cil takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED T.HA T:
1. The Final Plat of "P LA T SHOWING QUENZER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO~
8 LOCATED I N THE NE ~ OF THE SE IA OF T~ 4N~, R~ lE~, SECTION 31,
BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005~
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR QUENZER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO.8 / (FP-OS-015)
page 1 of4
(~~.:..
HANDWRITTEN DATE: 02/14/0500, SHEET 1 OF 3, ENGINEERING
NORTHWEST, LLC, BOISE, IDAHO", BRIGHTON DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
BOISE, IDAHO, Develo.per, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions
of Staff comments as set fort11 in the Memorandulu to tIle Mayor and City Cou.-ncil
froIn So.nya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department
and Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager for the Public Works
Department, d.ated: Hearing Date: March 15, 2005, listing 14 SIT.E SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 7 GEN.E.RAL R.EQUIREMENTS, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exllibit "A", an.d consisting of 4
pages, and by tl1is reference incorporated herein, and. the response letter from
Brighton Development, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto
marked Exllibit "B" and consisting of 1 .page, and .by this reference incorporated
herein, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at th.eir
March 15, 2005 Ineeting as follows, to-wit:
1 ~ 1 Ad.opt the Recommendation of the Central
District Healtl1 Department as follows:
TIle Central District .Health requires after
w.ntten approval from the appropriate entities
are submitted, they can approve this proposal
for central sewage and central water; that
plans .must be submitted to and approved by
the Idaho De.partment of Health and Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality for central
sewage and. central water; that rull.-off is not to
create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is
suggested that the stormwater be pretreated
ORDER O.F CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR QUENZER COMMONS SUBDNISION NO.8 / (FP-OS-015)
page 2 Of 4
//~...
(:......
through a grassy swale .prior to discllarge to
the subsurface to prevent impact to
groundwater and surface water quality; tIlat
el1gineers and architects should. obtain current
best management practices for stonnwater
disposal and design a stormwater management
systeln that is preventing groundwater and
surface water degradation. Manuals for
guidance:
1. State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best
Management Practices for Idall0 Cities and
Cou.nties. Prepared .by the Idaho Di vision of
Envirornnental Quality, July 1997.
2. Stormwater Best Management Practices
Guidebook~ Prepared by City of .Boise Public
Works Department, May 2000.
2. The final plat upon whic.h tllere is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets tIle City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site ilnprovem.ents are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS AN.AL YSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that p.ursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed wit11 the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue~ A
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR QUENZER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO.8 / (FP-OS-015)
page 3 of4
(~.:.......:.
request for a regulatory takings al1alysis will toll the tilne .period within whicl1 a Petitio!l for Judicial
Review Inay be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing .body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67 -6521. An affected perSOll being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twel1ty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idall0 Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting l1eld on the ~SH- day
of -1Y\CLrQh
, 2005~
Attest:
By:
City Clerk's Office
Dated: 4 -\ \-05
G.RDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR QUENZER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO.8 I (FP-OS-015)
page 4 Of 4
f~ .~:-. .
t,......: .
/~...
(
f
;-
MAYOR
Tallllny de Weerd
fliitfJ.I~. i'
· .-+'...: !:.~~~.~'~~~; '~~'1'
Ian v
ID/\HO .t'
./
PUBLlC WORKS
BUILDlNG DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 · Fax (208)898-9551
PLANNING AND ZONING
.DEPARTMENT
(208) 884~5533 · FAX 888~6854
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keitl1 Bird
Christille Donllell
Shaull Wardle
Cllarles M. Rou ntl~c
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
To:
Mayor an.d City Council
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner JII.
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
From:
Re:
Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8
Final Plat approval of Two (2) Building Lots on 2.44 Acres in a proposed C-N
Zone (currently R-8 zone), by Brighton. Development, Inc. (File No. FP-05-015)~
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Brighton Development, In.c~, has ap.plied for Final Plat approval of 2 building lots
on 2.44 acres of land for Quenzer COffil11ons Subdivision No~ 8. The zoning designation for the
proposed subdivision is R-8 (Medium Density Residential) and was approved for co:mmercial
use as part of the 20% land use exception approved. with the conditional use permit/planned
development A rezone application is currently in process that wo.uld change the zoning
designation to C-N (Neighborh.ood Commercial) for tIle commercial :portion of the develop.ment
if ~p.proved.
Quenzer COffilTIOnS Subdivision No.8 is located on tIle west side of N. Locust Grove Road,
approximately Y2 mile north ofE~ Ustick Road, in the SE ~ of Section 31, T.4N., R~lE~
Tllis su.bdivision was prelilninary platted under the name of Heritage Commons Subdivision. The
sublnitted final plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary :plat.
Staff recommends approval of the fi.nal plat with the comments and conditions stated in tl1is
report.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT
FP-OS-O 15
EXhibit "A'~
Quenzer Comnlons Sub8 FP.doc
(
Mayor & Ci ty Council
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
Page 2
1. Applicant shall meet all terms of tile ap:proved Prelilninary Plat (PP-02-007), Conditional
Use PennitlPlanned Developtne.nt (CUP-02-007), al1d Developlnel1t Agreement (Inst.
No.102078396).
2. Temporary constru.ction fencing is not required along the .boundaries of this phase. The
applicant submitted a construction debris co.ntainment plan/letter as part of the
.preliminary plat application.
3. Street buffer landscaping along N~ Locust Grove Road was installed with. Quenzer
Commons Subdivision phase. 3.
4. TIle pressurized irrigation system within this develo.pment is to be owned and maintained
by the Owner's Association. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation
systems be sup.plied by a year-round source of water.. If a. creek or well source is not
available, a single-point connection to the culinary water systeln shall be required. Plans
and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by tIle Public Works
Department as .part of the development .plan review process, and a draft copy of the
pressurized irrigation system O&M :manual must be sublnitted prior to plan approval. If a
single-point connection is utilized, tIle developer shall be responsible for the :pa)'lnent of
assessments for tIle irrigable common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the
Meridian City Engineer.
5. Street signs are to be in place, water system sllaII be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and.
road base ap.proved by the Ada County Highway District :prior to applying for building
pennits. All development improvetuents, including perimeter fencing, irrigation, and
landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occu.pancy.
A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
landscaping, pressurized irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc~, prior to
signature on the final plat.
6. Sanitary sewer and municipal water services to this site s.hall be via extensions fro.m
existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water .mains to
and through this proposed developnlent, thereby making them available to adjacent
properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with th.e Public
Works Departlnent. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of
easements, for any mains that are required to provide service.
7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and
co.nstruction inspection fees, as determined during the .plan review process, prior to
signature on the final .plat per Resolution 02-374.
8. Please submit all updated grou.ndwaterlsoiis monitoring data to the Pu.blic Works
Department for review. Any drainage areas ( detention/rete.ntion basins) Inust be designed
to ensure tllat water "is retained only during lOO-year storm events, and for a .period of
time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3: 1. Any
portion of a drainage area not improved with sodl grass seed (or other approved
FP-OS-O 15 EXhibit "A" Quenzer ConUTIons Sub8 FP.doc
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
Page 3
(~:.......:..
landscaping) shall not count towards the req.uired open space area. The project engineer
should pay close attention to the results of field. studies detennining the groundwater, soil
type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall
be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a IninimUln of 3-feet
above tIle highest establislled normal groundwater elevation.
9. Complete the Certificate of Owners and its accolnpanying Acknowledgement.
1 o. Applicant shall comply with the item #8 of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
and Order of Conditional Approval of the preliminary plat, which reads: There is an
existing] lJ300 foot long, 20-fool wide ingress-egress easement adjacent to the north
boundary which provides LOCllst Grove Access for the two Crestwood S'ubdivision lots
and the unplatted parceL The easement appears to lie entirely within the Heritage
commons boundary" The applicant shall submit evidence that the easement of record
permits the applicant to dedicate a public road over the top of said easement without
vacating the easement and witho'ut obtaining consent of the beneficiaries of the easement.
11. Applicant s.hall .be responsible for application and. cOlnpliance witll any Section 404
Permitting that may be required by the Army Co~ps of Engineers.
12.. Applicant shall be res.ponsible for ap.plication an.d com.pliance with and NPDES
Permitting that Inay be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
13. prease add or revise the following plat notes on the plat dated 2/14/05:
(10.) Add a note pertaining to the Right to Farm Act.
14. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms of the ap.proved preliminary
.plat, conditional .use permit or development agreement does .not relieve the Applicant of
responsibility for compliance.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is relnoved from the property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being tIle equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that
were relTIoved. Required landsca:ping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for
those trees that have to be removed.
2. All inigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided sllall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13.. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written
approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department If lateral users
association approval: can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the
Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature
FP -05-0 15
Exh j hi t "A"
Quenzer commons Sub8 F.Podoc
{J .;....~ .
~:.... .... . ~
<:"on.:.:,..:. .
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
Page 4
3. Any existing dom.estic wells al1d/or septic systelTIS within tll1s project will llave to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
4~ Two-hundred.-watt, higl1-pressure sodiulTI streetlights will be required at locations
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall .be installed at
subdivider's expel1se. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are cOlnpleted by
Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from
the Public Works Department .prior commencing installations.
5. Compaction test results must .be sublnitted to the Meridian Building Departlnent for all
building pads receiving engineered. backfill, where footing would sit atop fill luaterial.
6. Coordinate fire hydrant :placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Departnlent
7. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the above stated comments and conditions.
FP-OS-O 15
EXhibit "A"
Quenzer commons SUbS FP.doc
(
O~/15/05 15:02 FAX 208 377 8962
I4J 002/003
Brighton Development Inc.
12601 w. Explorer Drive
Boise, In 83713
March 15,2005
Mayor Tammy DeWeerd
City COWlCil Members
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Avc~
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Heritage Commons Subdivision No. 8
Dear Mayor and Council:
We are in receipt of staff report including conditions of approval for Heritage Commons
Subdivision No~ 8. We are in agreement of those conditions.-
Sincerely,
David W. Turnbull
President
I ~,hibil frJ jU
(."..
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C March 15, 2005
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF PARAMOUNT )
DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR .FINAL )
PLAT APPROVAL OF 47 SINGLE- )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING )
LOTS AND 2 COMMON LOTS ON )
17.53 ACRES IN AN R-8 ZONE )
LOCATED SOUTH OF CHINDEN )
BOULEVARD AND WEST OF )
NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD A )
RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 8, )
BLOCK 20 OF PARAMOUNT )
SUBDIVISION NO.4 AND A )
PORTION OF THE N ~ OF T. 4N.,
R.IW., SECTION 25
CASE NO. FP-OS-017
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on Marc.h 15,2005, and the Cou.ncil finding that the Administrative
.Review is complete from Sonya Allel1, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Departme.nt, and Bruce Freckleton, Develo.p.ment Services Manager for the Public Works
De.partment, dated: Hearing Date: March 15, 2005, to the .Mayor and Coun.cil, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PARAMOUNT S.UBDIVISION NO~ 5 / (FP-OS-O 17)
page 1. of4
(:.~...
1~ The Final Plat of "PLAT SHO.WING PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO.5 A
RESU:SDIVISON OF LOT 8, BLOCK 20 OF PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO.4
AND A PORTION OF THE N 12 OF T. 4N., R. 1 W., SECTION 25, BOISE
MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005, HANDWRITTEN
DATE: 02/09/05, SHEET 1 OF 5, ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC, BOISE,
IDAHO", PARAMOUNT DEVELOPMENT, INC., BOISE, IDAHO, Developer, is
Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in
tIle Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City
Plarmer for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Development
Services Manager for the Public Works Departlnent, dated: Hearing Date: MarcIl 15,
2005, listing 20 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 7
GENERAL REQ.UIREMENTS, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto
marked Exllibit "A", and consisting of 5 pages, and .by this reference incorporated
l1erein, and tIle response letter frOlTI Paramount Development, Inc~, a true and correct
co:py of which is attached hereto .marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 1 pages, and
by this reference incorporated herein, and the additional requirements from the action
of the Council taken at their March 15,2005 meeting as follows, to-wit:
1 ~ I Adopt the Recoffilnendation of the Central District
Health Department as follows:
The Central District Health requires after written
approval from the appropriate entities are sublnitted,
they can approve this proposal for central sewage and
central water; that plans must be submitted to and
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FmAL PLAT
FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDMSION NO.5 / (FP-OS-017)
page 2 Of 4
(..... .>
(:-...'......
approved by the Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for
central sewage and central water; that run-offis not to
create a lTIosquito breeding problem; alld it is
suggested that the sto.rmwater be pretreated through a
grassy swale .prior to discllarge to the subsurface to
prevent impact to groundwater and surface water
quality; that engineers and architects s.hould obtain
current .best management :practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater managelnent system
that is preventing groundwater and surface water
degradation. Manuals for guidance:
1. State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best
Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by th.e Idaho Division of Environmental
Quality, July 1997.
2. Stonnwater .Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Pu.blic Works Department,
May 2000.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certificatio.n and signature of the
City Clerk and tIle City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requireme.nts shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
an.d/or the ~ppropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67 -8003, the Owner may
request a regulatoryta.king analysis. Such request must be in writing, and m.ust be filed with the City
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO.5 / (FP-OS-017)
page 3 of4
~.. .
(......
. .
Clerk .not more tllan twenty-eight (28) days after the fi.nal decisio.ll concerning the Inatter at issue~ A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
Please take notice tllat this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code ~ 67 -6521 ~ An affected person. being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) d.ays
after the date of this decision and order, see.k a judicial review as provided by Cllapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 16th day
of \^(\ UX{\~.h
, 2005.
Attest:
By: \ 1
City Clerk's Office
Dated: 4-' 1...()S
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO.5 / (FP-OS-017)
page 4 Of 4
MAYOR
TalnnlY de Wecrd
(~....;.. .
CI ~1"Y 0 F
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDINC DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 · Fax (208)898-955]
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keitlt Bird
Cllristille DonlleII
Sllaull Wardle
Cllarles M. Roulltree
IDi\HO
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 4 FAX 888~6854
STAFF REPORT:
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner ()Il
Bruce Freckleton, Developlne.nt Services Manager
From:
Re:
-Paramount Subdivision No.5
Final Plat approval of Forty-seven (47) Single-Family Residential Building Lots
and Two (2) COlnmoll Lots on 17.53 Acres in an R-8 Zone, by Paramount
Development, Inc. (File No. FP-05-017).
We have reviewed tIle above referenced submittals and offer tIle following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified
or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Paramount Development Inc., has applied for Final Plat approval of 47 single-
family residential bu.ilding lots and 2 common lots on 17.53 acres of land for Paramount
Subdivision No.5. The zoning designation for the proposed su.bdivision is R-8 (Medium Density
Residential). This phase of the subdivision will have a gross density of 2.68 d.u./acre and a net
density of 4.10 d.u./acre.
Paramount Subdivision No.5 is located on the south side of Chinden Blvd., approxilnately 'l1
mile west ofN. Meridian, in the N. YS of Section 25, T.4N., R.IW.
The commo:n area lots within the subdivision consist of landscape lots. T.he pressurized irrigation
system wit11in this development is to be owned and Inaintained by the Paramount Ho.meowners
Association.
A Conditional Use Perm.it (Planned Development) was approved for this subdivision tllat
allowed for a reduction in the minimUlTI lot size from 6,500 s.f to 5,500 s.f.; fro.ut setbacks
reduced from 15' for living areas to 10'; street side setbacks reduced from 20' to 10'; and a
reduction in street frontage from 65' to 50'.
The submitted final plat substantially complies with tIle approved preliminary plat. The final plat
Sl10WS six lots less than was approved o.n the preliminary plat; however, staff has no objection to
this change due to the increase in lot sizes.
FP-OS-017 EXhibit "An ParalTIOunt SUbS FP.doc
(.
r.~...
( . .. .:
\.:. .... . .
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
Page 2
Staffreconunends approval of the final plat for Paratno.unt Subdivision No.5 with the COlnments
and conditions stated in this report.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT
1. Applicant is to :meet all terms of the approved preliminary.plat (PP-03-004), conditional
.use permit (CUP-03-008) and developlnent agreement (Inst. No. 103137116).
2. The applicant has indicated tllat the Paramount Homeowners Association will own and
maintain the .pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian
requires that pressurized irrigation systelTIS be supplied by a year-round source of water.
If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culi.nary water
system shall be required. Plans and specificatio.ns for the irrigation system shall be
reviewed. by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review
process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be
submitted prior to plan ~pproval. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer
shall be responsible for the .paytnent of asseSSill.ents for the irrigable common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
3. Temporary constructio.n. fencing to contain de.bris sllalI be installed along the boundaries
of this phase unless fencing already exists at the subdivision boundaries.
4. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing
installed, drainage lots constru.cted, road base a.p.proved .by the Ada County Hig.hway
District and tIle Final Plat for this subdivision s11all .be recorded, prior to applying for
building permits.
5. All develo.pment improvements, including sewer, fencing, Inicro-paths, pressurized
irrigation. and landsc~ping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates
of occupancy.
6. A letter of credit or cash surety in the anlount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
7" Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from
existing .mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water .mains to
and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent
properties. Subdivision d.esigner to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public
Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian. standard forms of
easements, for any mains that are required to provide service.
8. Applicant shall be .req.uired to pay Public Works development plan review, and
construction inspection fees, as d.etermined during the plan review process, prior to
signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374.
FP-OS-O I 7 EXhibit HA'" paramount SUbS FP.doc
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: MarcIl 15, 2005
Page 3
( .:
(..
9~ Revise the landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, dated 1/10/05 as follows:
a. Include landscaping for Lot 1, Block 24.
b. Include fencing along the rear lot lines of all lots that abut the common lot on Lot
Lot 12, Block 21.
1 o. Revise or ad.d the following .notes o.n the face of the plat dated. 2/1 0105, prepared by
Engineering Northwest:
(11.) ". . . unless specifically allo"l'~{cd by the .t^..da Count),. Higb."l'vay District and the Cit),
of 11cridian."
(13.) Add Development Agreelnent Instrument No. 103137116.
(14~) Add a note that states the ownership & maintenance responsibilities of the
pressurized irrigation system witllin this developmen.t
(15.) Add a note referring to the public .pedestrian easement on a portion of Lot 12,
Block 21 and note the recorded instrument number of the agreement.
11. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
12. The street frontage for .Lots 17 & 18, Block 21 do .not meet the min. requirements. Eitller
adjust the frontage to meet the rninimUlTI 3D-foot width, or if they are sharing a common
drive, show a 3D-foot wide common drive easement centered on the common lot line.
13. A permanent .public pedestrian easement shall .be created for the pathway within Lot 12,
Block 21 and. recorded prior to signature of the City Engineer on the final plat~ The
easement shall.be sufficient width to cover the lO-foot wide pathway shown. TIle 10-foot
wide hard surfaced pathway shall be constru.cted and fully improved prior to the issuance
of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building within this phase of the subdivision~
Applicant shall work with the City Parks Dept and conform to th.e Park's Dept stan.dards
for construction of tIle pathway~ The Homeowner's Association is respo.nsible for
maintenance of all landscaping adjacent to the pathway.
14. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's "Final" letter for the
street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply.
15. Graphically de.pict 5-foot wide easement along the west side of Lot 8, Block 23, Lot 9,
Block 12, and the southwesterly side of Lot 9, Block 20, and Lot 3, Block 21 as these are
or will be side lot line against other phases of this development
16. Graphically depict an 8-foot wide public utilities, drainage and irrigation easelnent along
the west side of Lot 16, Block 21. The extra width is required due to the location of an
irrigation main.
17. Please submit all updated ground.water/soils monitoring data to the Public Works
Departlnent for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed
FP-OS-O 17 EXhibit "A" paramount SUbS FP.doc
(~.~... .
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15,2005
Page 4
to ensure that water is retained only during 1 GO-year stonn events, and for a period of
time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3: 1 ~ Any
portion of a drainage area not ilnproved with sod/grass seed (or other approved
landscaping) shall not count towards tile required open space area. The project engineer
should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil
type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. TIle engineer shall
be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet
above the highest established normal groundwater elevation~ This is to ensure that the
.bottom elevation of tIle crawl spaces ofholues is at least I-foot above.
18. Applicant shall be responsible for application and com.pliance with any Section 404
Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
19. Applicant shall be responsible for application and cOlnpliance witll and .NPDES
Pennitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
20. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance :provisions or terms of the approved preliminary
plat or conditional use permit does not relieve the Ap:plicant of responsibility for
compliance.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided. shall .be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written
approval or non-ap.proval su.bmitted to the Public Works Department If lateral users
association approval can't be obtail1ed, plans will .be reviewed and approved by tIle
meridian City Engineer .prior to final plat signature
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this .project will have to be
removed fro.m their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8~ Wells
may be used for non-domestic :purposes suell as landscape irrigation.
3. Two-hundred-fifty and One-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodium. streetligllts will be
required at locations designated by the Pu.blic Works Department All streetlights shall be
installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire
hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are
completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor sllall obtain design and
.permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
4. COlnpaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit ato:p fill material.
5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying
that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the
highest established normal groundwater elevation.
FP-OS-O 17 EXhibit '~A" paramount SUbS FP .doc
( ~:'.
(~?.::.
Mayor & City Council
Hearing Date: March 15, 2005
Page 5
6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works
Superintendent.
7. AllY tree over 4" in caliper that is removed frOlD the :property shall be replaced by
installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that
were relnoved~ Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for
those trees that have to be removed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Paramount Subdivision N.o. 5 with. the above
stated COlnments and conditions~
FP-OS-O 17
EXhibit '''A~;
Paramou nt Su b5 FP .doc
03/15/05 15: 02 FAX 208 3ii;,J~.962
t ...
/~.. .
(:..:. .
ft1 003/00:3
ParamolUlt Development Inc.
12601 W. Explorer Drive
Boise, ID 83 713
March 15, 2005
Mayor Tammy DeWeerd
City Council Members
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Ave..
Meridian, ill 83 642
Re: Paramotu1t Subdivision 5
Dear Mayor and Council:
We are in receipt of staff report including conditions of approval for Paramount
Subdivision 5.. We are in agreement of those conditions.
Sincerely,
David W. Turnbull
President
1 ~ X 11 i hit ~J ll..
!
** TX CONF IRMh ~.1 ON REPORT **
(
AS OF MAR 11 ' 0~=-.. 18: 08 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 01 ' 20 ii 004 029 OK
27 03/11 17:58 PUBLIC WORKS
29 03/11 18:02 12084664405 EC--S 01'21" 004 029 OK
03/11 18 : 03 8841159 EC --5 131 ' 20 t, 004 029 OK
30 EC--S 01 ' 23 i' 004 029 OK
31 03/11 18:05 2088840744
32 03/11 18:07 POLICE DEPT EC--S 01'20n 004 029 OK _______
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YVeU5e ?05~ fcx f'l^-bl \ t- ~Vh Cc -l'hoJ\llr
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m~
City Council Chambers
1. RoJl.call Attendance:
- Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
- Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2~ Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by:
4.. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A~ Approve Minutes of February 22.. 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting:
B.. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04~053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a l-Q zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners. Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road:
c. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04~
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road:
D.. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04..
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-famify
residential building lots and 3 other lots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdlvifion by Randy Worden _
4625 West Ustick Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR
05-004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian Cny Council Agonda - MarCh 1St 2005 page 1 Df 4
AU material9 presented at PUbliC meetings ShaH become property Of the City Of Meridian.
AnYOne deSIring accommodatiOn (or diSabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk's Office at B88-4433 at feast 46 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meetlng.
** TX CONF r ~t M I .. I ON REPORT **
("
AS OF MAR 15 '0~ d3:21 PAGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
26 03/15 23:07 3810160
27 03/15 23:10 PUBLIC WORKS
28 03/15 23:12 8841159
29 03/15 23:13 2088840744
30 03/15 23=15 POLICE DEPT
31 03/15 23=17 8985501
32 03/15 23=19 LIBRARY
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDt:t STATUS
EC--S 02' 29 t, 004 058 OK
EC--S 01 · 25" 004 058 OK
EC--S 01 J 25" 004 058 OK
EC--S 01 · 27.J 004 058 OK
EC--S 131' 25" 0134 laSS OK
EC--S 131 J 25" 004 058 OK
EC--S 011 S4.t 1304 058 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised 3..15-05
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15. 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Roll...call Attendance:
1- Shaun Wardle --L. Christine Donnell
)( Charlie Rountree )( Keith Bird
- -L Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: ~Jd-~
3.. Community Invocation by Bud Henthorn, Youth Pastor at Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: fJY'a.e-h~
4.. Adoption of the Agenda: ~J1}'1Y"""~ #>
5. Consent Agenda: WfJ'rr? vw:.....
A. Approve Minutes of February 22lJ 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting: #tl'r~
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a l..O zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and PlannersJ Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road: d;/I''''VL.;
Cot Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5..01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road: (ql'pN-
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04~
045 Request for Preliminary Pial approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other lots on 4..56 acres in a proposed
R4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden -
4625 West Ustick Road: 4/j1"rD~
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: VAR
05-004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City Council Agenda.... March 1SJ: 2005 Page 1 of 4
All materials presented at pubJic meetings shat' become property Of the City of Meridian.
AnYOne desiring aCCOmmOdatiOn for diS8bUftles related to dOCuments andfor hearingS
Please contact the City Cl8rkJS Office at BBs.4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the pUb'ic meeting.
** TX coL
RS OF
("
MAR 15 ' 05~""""~_. 57
PAGE.. 01
.1AT I O'i REPORT **
CITY OF MERIDIAN
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
DAT~ TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS
03/15 23:22 92083776449 EC--S 01'25U 004
03/15 23:23 3886924 EC--S 01'25u 004
03/15 23: 25 P-AND-Z EC--S 01) 25" 004
03/15 23=27 208 895 0390 EC--S 01'25n 004
03/15 23:29 208 387 6393 EC--S el'2St~ 004
03/15 23: 31 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC--S 01) 26Jt 004
03/15 23:33 8885052 EC--S 01 t 2Su 004
03/15 23:36 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'01u 000
03/15 23: 37 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00 ~ 01 tl 000
03/15 23:37 CHERRY LANE G3--S ~0'34't 000
03/15 23:38 CHERRY LANE G3--S 00'35" 000
03/15 23:40 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 01'2Su 004
03/15 23=42 1D PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 01'26" 004
03/15 23:57 MER SCHOOL DISTR ----5 00'00n 000
THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY
CMD~ STATUS
058 OK
058 OK
058 OK
058 OK
058 OK
058 OK
058 OK
058 INC
058 I NC
058 I NC
1358 J NC
058 OK
0S8 OK
058 BUSY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday. March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
Revised 3-15-05
City Council Chambers
1. ROII-ca11 Attendance:
1- Shaun Wardle ---K- Christine Donnell
)( Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
- -L Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance: ;rrv:ed-~
3. Community Invocation by Bud Henthorn, Youth Pastor at Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle: fJY.Gi'.f'/h~
4.
Adoption of the Agenda:
11~" ""e '
5.. Consent Agenda: &fjJrr' ~
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting: It I'r ....-.c..--
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-053 Request for a Conditional Use permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a l-O zone for OB/GYN
Assoc~ates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road: _/ "rlvc...
c~ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 aa-es from RUT
to R4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road: ~tl;rn:'~
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04.
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other !ots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden -
4625 West Ustick Road: 4/jh*"rI~
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: V AR
05..004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15~ 2005 Page 1 of 4
All materialS presented at PUbliC meetingS shaJl become property Of tho City Of Meridian.
Anyone desjring aCCOmmodation ror djSlbUitJes related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City CI9rkJS Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbiC meeting.
('.
** TX CONP-.,.... ~TION REPORT **
(/~..
AS OF MRR 11 J 05 i.,.:.. ..d PAGE~ 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TrME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEe PGS CMD~ STATUS
03/11 18: 09 8985501 EC--S 131) 19'" 004 029 OK
03/11 18=11 LIBRARY EC--S 01t46U 004 029 OK
03/11 18: 13 92083776449 EC --5 01 ' 20}' 004 029 OK
03/11 18: 15 3886924 EC--S 131 t 20Jt 004 029 OK
B3/11 18: 17 P-AND-Z EC--S 01- 20J'f 004 029 OK
03/11 18= 19 200 895 0390 EC--S 01) 19" 004 029 OK
03/11 18: 21 128300040 G3--S 01 ' 43" 004 029 OK
03/11 18: 23 208 387 6393 EC--S 01 j 20u 004 1929 OK
03/11 18:25 ADA CTY DEUELMT ~c--s Blt21U 004 029 OK
03/11 18= 27 8885052 EC--S 01' 20" 0'04 029 OK
03/11 18: 29 CHERRY LANE G3--S 02' 36tt 004 029 OK
03/11 18=32 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 01t20n 004 029 OK
133/11 18: 34 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 01' 20JJ 004 029 OK
~~ 03/11 18:36 2088885701 EC--S 01J20n 0134 029 OK
15 03/11 18:45 38113160 EC--S 02'19u 004 ~::____~~_________________
~-~--~~--~~~--~~-~~~~~~~~-~-~-~~~~~--~-~---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~-~-~-~
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Y\fU5e ?ost ~ t'v..bl' ~ lJdhc~ -lhoJ\V:r
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m*
City Council Chambers
1 ~ RolI..call Attendance:
- Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
- _ Mayor Tammy de Weard
2~ Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by:
4.. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting:
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04..053 Request for a Conditional Use Pennit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a L-o zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and P~annerSt Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road:
c~ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ ~
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for J{lamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Usfick Road:
o. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: PP 04..
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 sing'e-family
residential building Jots and 3 other lots On 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden _
4625 West Ustick Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR
05.004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City CouncU Agenda - MarCh 15~ 2005 page 1 Of 4
AU materia19 presented at PUbliC meetings Shall become property or thO City Of Meridisn.
AnYOne desIring accommodatiOn for disabJrrtias related to documents and/or hsanngs
Please contact the Cify ClerJ<8 Office at 8884433 at feast 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
i
~
** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT **
/:
( .
~~
AS OF MRR 14 '05 14:17 PAGE~01
CITY OF MERIDIRN
DATE TIME TO/FROM
05 03/14 14:15 12083363558
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS
EC--S 01 ' 15;' 004 039 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCJL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p..ml..
City Council Chambers
1.. Rollwcall Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Kejth Bird
_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
34 Community Invocation by:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting:
B~ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04.053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
DeveJopment for a clinic I office in a L-O zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road:
c. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.01 acres from RUT
to Rw4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road:
D.. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 single-family
residential building lots and 3 other Jots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden _
4625 West Ustick Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR
05~004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City CouncH Agenda - March 15,2005 Page 1 of 4
All mate riars presented at PUbliC meetings sha IJ become property Of the City Of Meridian.
Anyo ne deSiring acCOmmOdatiOn for drsabtlities reJ ated to documents and/or hear~ngs
pJease co ntact the City Clerkts Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
~>
P\f(ljC.:.. .?os~ ~ P\^-\:)l \ t- tJdhc.~ -r~ uJ\\L.f
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCil REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Rofl-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of February 22, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting:
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04M053 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a clinic I office in a L-Q zone for OB/GYN
Associates by ZGA Architects and Planners, Chartered - south of
East Franklin Road and east of North Eagle Road:
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 04-
035 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5~01 acres from RUT
to R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy by Worden
- 4625 West Ustick Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04-
045 Request for Preliminary Plat approval Of 12 single-family
residential building Jots and 3 other lots on 4.56 acres in a proposed
R-4 zone for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy Worden _
4625 West Ustick Road:
E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: VAR
05-004 Request for a Variance for block lengths from the required
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 1 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City Of Meridian.
AnYOne deSiring a ceo mrno dati on for disabifities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours Prior to the PUbliC meeting,
(:......
(
450 feet to 535 feet for Klamath Basin Subdivision by Randy
Worden - 4625 West Ustick Road:
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 04-
034 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.63 acres from a RUT
zone to a R-8 zone for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo
Construction - 6000 North Meridian Road:
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 04~
043 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 98 building lots and
27 common lots on 19.63 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
04-052 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development for a residential subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone
for Hacienda Subdivision by Jayo Construction - 6000 North
Meridian Road:
I. Water SelVice Easement for McKaaue Familv Revocable livina
Trust:
J. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for McKaaue Famil)l
Revocable Livina Trust:
KG Approve liquor license for Backwater Saloon:
l. Request for Approval of proposal for Master Plan. landscape
and Architectural Services for the 7 -acre neiahborhood Dark in
Autumn Faire Subdivision by Jensen-Belts Associates and the
DeSign Team:
M. Resolution NOa Warranty Deed from
Autumn Fajre~ LtC to the City of Meridian:
N. Resolution No. Establishing
ApPointments for Board Members and Alternates to the Vall~
Ride Reaional TransDortation Authori~:
o. Aareement with HDR for GIS On Call Services:
P. Chanae Order No.2 for an Addition Pressure Reducina Valve
with Star Construction:
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 2 of 4
AU materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours Prior to the PUbliC meeting,
(N
\
(.
<.... .:
Q. Award Bid for Victory Road I Meridian Road Water Main to Paul
Construction:
R. Streetliaht Aareement for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
s. Streetliaht Quitclaim Deed for Vienna Woods Subdivision:
T. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "Au in
proDosed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
u. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Parcel "8" in
proDosed Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties:
6. Department Reports
A. Police Department - Chief Bill Musser
1. Presentation of MOU with Ada County Sheriff
Department for Participation in SWAT Team:
7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
8. Request for Reduction in Fees for Pinebridge Subdivision by Dave
McKinnon:
9. FP 05-015 Request for Final Plat approval for 2 office building lots on 2.44
acres in a R-8 zone for Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.8 by
Brighton Development, Inc~ - west of Locust Grove Road and north of
Ustick Road:
1.0. FP 05-016 Request for Final Plat approval of 50 single-family residential
building lots and 9 common lots on 23.71 acres in a R..4 zone for
Bridaetower Crossina Subdivision No. 11 by Primeland Development,
LLP - west of North Linder Road and south of West McMillan Road:
11. FP 05-017 Request for Final Plat approval for 47 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 17.53 acres in a R-8 zone for
Paramount Subdivision No.5 by Paramount Development, Inc. - south
of Chinden Boulevard and west of North Meridian Road:
lIAlthough the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and
honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
12. Continued Public Hearing from March 1, 2005: PFP 04.,008 Request
for Preliminary/Fin~d Plat approval for 4 building lots on 8.02 acres in an 1_
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15, 2005 Page 3 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
AnYOne deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours Prior to the PUbliC meeting,
t" "
{
(y""
L zone for Nola Subdivision by Bergey Land Surveying - SWC of East
Pine Avenue and North Nola Road:
13. Public Hearing: AZ 04-033 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of
15.92 acres from C-2 and RUT zones to C-G zone for Star-It by Avast LP
- 355 North Ten Mile Road:
14. Public Hearing: CUP 04-055 Request for a Conditional Use Permit I
Planned Development for office, retail and daycare uses in an I-L zone as
required by CUP 04-009 and a request for a building height modification
from the previously approved 40-feet to 52-feet for DBSI Realty COrD. by
DBSI Realty Corp. - north of West Overland Road and east of South
Linder Road:
15. Public Hearing: PP 05-001 Request for an amendment of the
Preliminary Plat for phases 7 & 1 0 of Saauaro Canyon Subdivision
consisting of 21 single family residential building lots on 6+/- acres in a R-
4 zone by Farwest - 6210. North Meridian Road:
16. Public Hearing: RZ 04-016 Request for a Rezone of .27 acre from R-4
to 0- T zone for Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard - 1305
West 1 st Street:
17. Public Hearing: PFP 04-009 Request for Preliminary Final Plat approval
of 4 single family attached residential building lots on .27 acre in a
proposed 0- T zone for Serendipity Place Subdivision by Susan Howard
- 1305 West 1st Street:
18. Public Hearing: CUP 04-054 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Development for retail uses in a C-N zone for The ShODS at
Cherry Lane by High Point Equitiesr lLC - SWC of West Cherry Lane
and North Ten Mile Road:
19. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
Meridian City Council Agenda - March 15. 2005 Page 4 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian~
AnYOne deSiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingS
Please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting,
~.......
** TX CQNF1Ri~J=lTION REPORT **
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DAT~ TIME TO/FROM
03/07 12=30 PUBLIC WORKS
03/07 12:31 8841159
03/07 12:32 2eeeS40744
03/07 12:33 POLICE DEPT
03/07 12: 34 8985501
03/07 12:34 LIBRARY
03/07 12:35 92083776449
03/07 12:37 P-AND-Z
03/07 12:38 208 895 0390
03/07 12:39 128300040
03/07 12:40 8885052
03/07 12:41 CHERRY LANE
03/07 12:42 IDAHO ATHlETiC C
03/07 12=43 ID PRESS TRiBUNE
03/07 12:45 2088886701
03/07 12:50 3886924
03/07 12:58 3810160
i'1ODE:
EC--S
EC--S
EC~-5
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC....-S
EC--S
G3--S
EC--S
G3--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
EC--S
j.
AS OF MAR 07 tl2l5 lL
CITY OF MERIDIRN
PAGE~01
MIN/SEC PGS
00. 28j, 001
00129t. 001
00' 29tJ 001
00'28u 001
00 ' 28~' 001
00'34J' 001
001 28t~ 001
00 t 28u~ 001
00-28t:1 001
00" 31 J:f 001
aaJ29U 001
0et 44" 001
00~ 28u~ 001
00-27u 001
00" 291' 001
00J28:u 1901
ee' 40tJ: 001
CMD~
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
243
STATUS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
flear.e jJtJJf I1r /fLMe ;/O~~-1l~/r-J
. ~ ;: I
~-..... ~ ~. / ~ .
P r" ll' (II' ~~~.~ .~i/:.~ l~ ~
Oi/l el~ldl::rn~:.~r~~~
1\/1 A ,:r)n
I~!n'm}. de \'Vecrd
C I TV CO lrt\. C J L !\: 1.t.1\ i lU:.l{;
Wi lJiDm l. ~I. NtlI'.
[<t:'i th Bird ·
Ch~rJes M. J((l1111tr~F
Sl~~tn Wtlrd ~~
Cfr\~ D I::P.\ r.rrMFNT$
Fire
54f} I~. J!ra nkJil1 Roa ,1
~q.RS-.t 23.J I fax 895 ~U:5~tJ
~)H rk~ & Rt.~cr~a ,ion
] 1 J ~~ B~)\\-(!r Str~~t
$$~~35791 fa ~ R98-:550 J
Plannil'~ &:: ZOJ 1111g
660 E I W ate IIL-.)\vc f L1;lnc
5u 1 t~ 207~
8S4 ~553J I fCJ~ S$8-6S~ Il
ro lice
14(ll EI Wa lerlo\vet L~ ll~
HRfi.667S I fax S~16-7366
Public l;Vo rJ.;s
660 E~ W 0 terlOl\r-cr l..~l'~
5f.l1 t~ 200
gYH..550D I tAX ;;~)S-Q551
- Dlli ldil1g
660 E~ \V.o t~rlowcr Lnnc
$111 tE;" 150
HH7-2211/ ftlx 8$7..1297
- Se\"~r (-"VW l.r'}
34t)] N.. ~rt:t.. MlJIt Ruad
$88-21911 f~I" A84-074-l
- \~lZt Ler
22~5 N,. w. ~th Stfc-el
~t)Sw52.421 fit): RS4-1 ! 59
ID-r \ti()
~ k ~i~l ~~'::..~..o;.;.~.-;~~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
SOILO WASTE AD-HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NOT1CE ~S HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Meridian Solid Waste
Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee will hoJd a meeting at Meridian City HaU,
Mayor's Conference Room~ 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
on Thursday, March 1 O. 2004 at 7:00 A.M. The committee wiU be
discussing the following items:
- Recycling Funds:
. Mad i a Release
· Applications
. Approve Request for Western Ada Recreation District
..... Solid Waste Ordinance
- Recycling Incentive
- Other Busi ness That May Arise
- Schedu Ie Next Meeting
The public is welcome to attend the meeting.
~~'f&Jl~r~~..
;~~r~~~~~~~'
Cf ~~ ~~. ~
Ii I "'IQ - .~
~~~4 ~L C)6J, ;
~ .. , <' 0 ~
William G. Bergf Jr~ ~~ ie~k1 /..;..i..... ~?~
~. ~ ^ ~,..- \O\:- .+, ~
~2~;~~'t~~1.'; . ...~.~ l'~
".~"',:' :i It.. I ... I ~.
DATED this 7th day of March 2005.
Solid Waste Ad..Hoc Advisory Committee Meeting..... March 10. 2005
All materialS presented at PUblio meetings shan become property of the Ctty of Meridian.
AnYOne deSiring 2locommodation for diSabilitieS related documen.ts and I or he~nn.9~ .
Please contact the City Clerf(s Office at 888-4433 at Isast 48 hOUrs prlor to the PUbliC meetIng..
en Y Hf\LL .1:1 Fo-\ST JD/I.HO AVENur. ~[ER(DJ^N j IDAHO 83642 (20R) 880-4433
t II) r Ll m.,: -l:.~ \ A~~.':'11 ~ H ~ \1\;-" HI.~UU~CES -F\:\ :{!i~.1{ 72:-;' rI fl.' , \t-.C,.,L' ~, L'""fILrf' RIU.I~(;, -l{\ X ~~ t 'I.S 13 'I.\.\'on' s OI~I;lC~_ l="H' ~RJ.._l.l.l III