Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-05CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE -COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 5:30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll -call Attendance: Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell Charlie Rountree Keith Bird Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Discussion of Assignment of Golf Course Lease with Presentation the Proposed New Operator: (*45 minutes) 4. Communities in Motion Presentation by Brad Hawkins -Clark: (*20 minutes) *Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Pre -Council Agenda —April 5, 2005 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE -COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 5.30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll -call Attendance: Shaun Wardle ZZ\'_ Christine Donnell Charlie Rountree 4_ Keith Bird �'SD�h✓ Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Adoption of the Agenda: V_4__ 3. Discussion of Assignment of Golf Course Lease with Presentation by the Proposed New Operator: (*45 minutes) 4. Communities in Motion Presentation by Brad Hawkins -Clark: (*20 minutes) *Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Pre -Council Agenda — April 5, 2005 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Apd] 29, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 3, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-A REQUEST Approve Minutes of April 5, 2005 Pre -Council Meeting AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS 6'44�p Date: Phone: Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting Aril 5 2005 The Meridian City Pre -Council meeting was called to order at 5:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle, Christine Donnell and Charlie Rountree, Members Absent: Mayor Tammy De Weerd, Staff Present: Doug Strong, Brad Hawkins -Clark and Will Berg. Iters 1. Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird O Mayor Tammy de Weerd Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Bird: Mr. President. Wardle: Mr_ Bird. Bird: 1 move we adopt the agenda as published. Donnell: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded. All those in favor say aye. ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Item 3. Discussion of Assignment of Golf Course Lease with Presentation by the Proposed New Operator: Oas: Thank you very much for inviting us to speak with you tonight. Just by way of introduction, this is Dick Davis and I am Eric Oas and we are very, very excited to announce to you the work that we are doing on obtaining the new lease for the City Golf Course. So, Dick with that, why don't you take it away. Davis: Thank you, honorable Councilmen, men and women here. We have been working for probably three or four months with the City Council, with the present lease holders to try and acquire the, what is now called Cherry Lane Golf Course. First of all, we are proposing a new name for this. This has to be approved by the City Council. We are going to call it Lake View Golf Course, if Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 2 of 20 adopted. That just came to us one day we were out there measuring rooms and stuff for remodeling and we looked out and saw that beautiful lake outside the clubhouse and I think that would just be a great name for the Golf Course. Why change the name? We are new and we would like a new name for the Golf Course. We are going to maybe have a little different style of management than has been in the past and we are really planning on converting this golf course into an asset that the city and all the residents of the city will be proud of. We think we can do it and we are anxious to get started on that task. There has been a little connotation of maybe not the highest quality golf course in the state and so we would like a new name to have a new beginning out there at the golf course. Oas: Just by way of speaking whom the new leaseholder is, I would like to introduce that the leaseholder is actually Lake View Meridian Investors and Lake View Meridian Investors is made up of the following individuals. First and foremost, Dick Davis who as you know or most of you know and those of you who don't, he is the former owner of the Boise Ranch Golf Course and Dick has just recently — well he has owned and operated the Boise Ranch Golf Course for the past 12 years. This golf course has a course that Dick and his team took from being a very mediocre facility and made it into a very well maintained and pleasing place to play. Dick is — he, I think, for most of you who know Dick he is a very warm and pretty decent guy to get along with. I think he has really created — what I think — Dick described to me once as being more of a family atmosphere from all of the folks that go and play and enjoy the Boise Ranch. Dick and his team just recently sold the Boise Ranch to another group and Dick is very ready, willing and able for this new challenge. With regard to our part of this process, I am Eric Oas, obviously, with Oas Laney. We are a commercial real estate developer, residential and commercial here in the Valley. We have been involved in the projects in this area that we have been involved in is Generations Plaza. This was a predecessor company to the company that my partner, Steve Laney and I have now. Steve was very active in the whole design and bringing that whole development together into downtown Meridian. The Double D's store, we are in the process of working with Dick and his team to relocate the, as most of you know, out to the site on the corner of Victory and Meridian Road. What we plan to do is introduce a new office building into the site where it currently is located near the railroad tracks and then the other project that we are involved with here in the Meridian areas, we have a residential project going on the comer of Locust Grove and Victory. We are also involved in developments in the Boise area as well as in Nampa, but we love the Treasure Valley and this is where our home is and this is where we intend to stay. The other investors that we plan to involve are — because this will be an LLC leaseholder, we will be presenting this opportunity unrelated other investors who haven't expressed an interest in investing in this company. Dick? Davis: Okay. How do we complete the transaction? Well, first of all — (inaudible) got there, I am trying to schedule a meeting with the. Men's r' Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 3 of 20 Association Officer's for Thursday night and one thing I really want to see is a strong and active Men's and Women's Association and league out there. I think it's good for the members, it's good for the golf course and it's a lot of fun. That's one thing we have done at Boise Ranch is really had an active Men's and Women's Association, so I am going to try and change the pessimism into optimism and get people out to play golf on Men's league night and the women typically play during the day — we are going to look maybe not this year, but starting an evening women's league, but for the ladies that are working, but also participate in ladies. One thing we have done at Boise Ranch is we build our men's league up this last year at our Men's Association meeting was the first night they could sign up for men's league. We limited it to 320 people because that's what fills up the golf course and it took us less than an hour to sign up 320 people and that's what I want to see happening out here at Cherry Lane is lots of participation and lots of people having a good time. We have already signed a purchase agreement with Cherry Lane Recreation, Inc., well I guess we have verbally agreed to all the terms — we haven't signed the agreement yet, but we are shooting at closing this deal around the 20th of this month. We are interviewing people. I have talked to pretty well all the employees there. We want to keep all the personnel that is there now. They are all good people and they know what they are doing and that's what I need is somebody to help me along. We are looking at maybe hiring a new additional superintendent type person. I am going to talk to Tom Funkhauser about maybe being the irrigation superintendent because I really want to green up all the areas that aren't green and full of weeds and I think it's going to take one guy just pretty well full time too because we have got to do a lot of hand watering this year. We are going to start on the irrigation system, but for this year it's going to tape a lot of hand watering and that is going to be a person that — it's going to be pretty much full time and Tom understands that irrigation system and he is a great guy and so I am going to and I haven't yet, but l wanted to meet with him today, but it didn't work out. I am going to try and meet with him tomorrow and see if something like that will work for him, but anyway, we have got to negotiate the terms of maintenance standard with the City of Meridian. Ted and I met this morning and we went over the guidelines for maintenance there. This is something that you as residents really need because we are partners with the city and we are taking care of their asset, so we need some guidelines and so that we get a decent report card. They have got to come and look at that thing and they will hear from the residents, but we want to provide a very, very nice facility for people to play on and the whole rules and regulations that we have to live by as leasees and Ted and I are working on that right now. One of the first things that we want to do is build a new maintenance facility. The maintenance facility has been over at Nita's house and she sold her property, so we are desperately in need of a maintenance facility and we are going to get it built before we run out of time on her facility. So, we are going parking equipment outside. It's the only place to park it. We may look at a temporary — some type of a temporary tent or something to put stuff under, depending on how the construction is going on the maintenance facility, but we want to build a 4,500 to 6,000 square foot Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 4 of 20 maintenance facility that we can store our equipment in and repair equipment as needed. As we go along, you know that's the closing is the 20th of April and the final approval of course with the lease and the City of Meridian would take place on 4128. We assume we are going to take over and I think we have agreed with these ladies and gentlemen that we want to be partners with each other and so I think that's pretty well a done deal. Okay, changes. Of course the name. The name will be changed. We are also going to offer maybe a unique thing, it's not going to be a country club, so don't get that idea when I say memberships. It's a public golf course, but we are going to offer memberships to people and we haven't worked out all the particulars of these. It might be a five-year membership that they pay for and they get reduced fees, they will get some bennies in the clubhouse. We are going to offer social memberships to people that don't play golf because we plan on expanding the bar and restaurant and making that a fun, good place to go eat and have a drink with your friends. We will be offering some memberships along those lines. We aren't going to refuse service to anybody, you know, that wants to play golf. That isn't what the memberships is about, it's just if people want to buy a five year deal, they are going to save a little money and get some extra bids, like maybe preferred (inaudible) or something along that line. We haven't worked all that out yet, but as we go along we will work with the city and do that. I have already mentioned the maintenance facility that we are proposing and the public hearing notice on that is the 19th of this month, so we need all the support we can get on that. Our plan is to basically do three holes really, really, concentrate on three holes a year. That don't mean we are going to let the other (inaudible ----) but we have got a long-range plan. The irrigation needs a lot of work on it and so we have worked out a deal with the city that we are going to try and identify three holes a year, but we may be rebuilding some greens, definitely upgrading fairways, we probably will have a tree planting project with the homeowners if they want to plant a tree out in front of their yard they can work with us on where to locate those things. We will take care of it. We just need it located so that the sprinklers don't miss the grass behind it and so that we can get our lawnmowers around it and everything like that. So, anyway, three holes a year. We are going to extend the bar and restaurant like I said to have some nice dinners out there. We can have Christmas parties for organizations and we are going to name the bar Bogies. You know any golfer knows what a bogie is. But also you can sit there and you can look at Bogus Basin from the bar and it's really a beautiful sight where we plan to build the bar. You can look out at the lake and see Bogus Basin and so Bogie kind of goes with the golf industry and also one of the amenities that we have there. This is something that we have really been begging for from the City Council as we would really like an ofd premise sign and we are thinking on Cherry Lane because the golf course is kind of back there in the middle and nobody sees it and we would like a sign out there, you know some place that we can take care of a little area and have a nice sign that you know that maybe we have a special on hamburgers this day or you know, steak dinners on Friday night or something like that that we can advertise to the people that are going up and down the road because if we put it on the golf course, f Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 5 of 20 nobody is going to see it but the golfers. But, we are working with the city to try and secure a place to put a nice sign. Oas: Dick, you might talk about the success you had at Boise Ranch with events like this and with your signage. Davis: Yeah, we put up — I actually just took over managing at Boise Ranch solely about three and half or four years ago and one of the first things I did was put in a big sign on the road there and you can't believe the people that — my favorite special was the burger in a bucket for $7.50. In other words they get a bucket of balls and a hamburger for $7.50 and it's a great lunch deal for people, but if they don't know about, if we don't have any way of advertising it, why it just don't work and so anyway, those are good. The tennis court thing was something that was brought up to us and I see no problem — we are planning on putting the maintenance facility to the south of the clubhouse, there is just a big lot of weeds there and it grows up to be weeds and it looks to be horrible. We think that a nice maintenance facility with some asphalt around it and no weeds which would actually add to the appearance of the place and then we can put some tennis courts on this end or we can put some tennis courts on the north end, the north side of the clubhouse. This is something that the city mentioned to us and it would just be more recreation for Meridian residents and I see no problem with that and we plan to listen. We are planning right after we take over of having and I am thinking four nights of homeowners and I believe we have got the addresses on everybody on the course? Is that not right? So, we will be mailing out a mailer to have a bull session, but I think we need to divide it up into four nights because I don't think we can get everybody in the room if we have it one night and so we are going to do it by house numbers and we want to just sit and listen to see what the residents want, you know, the people that live around the golf course and the people in the City of Meridian, we want to listen. We can't do everything, you know. We got to run the thing so that it makes money for us or we wouldn't be doing this, but we want to make it as congenial as it can be to all the people. I already mentioned the adopt a tree program. Oas: I think, Dick, that sort of concludes the formal park of the presentation, we are certainly open to any questions that City Council has. Wardle: Thank you very much. One of the points of clarification that I just want to make about this process is the fact that the partnership, Lake View Golf Course partnership and the LLC is purchasing assets from Cherry Lane recreation. The discussion we are having tonight is about the city assigning the current lease that we have with Chevy Lane Recreation to a new tenant. The one thing that the city is exercising in that lease option is an adoption of a new set of standards and so in just a minute I am going to turn the conversation over to the standards, but in the back of the room on the table is a set of standards that everyone can have a copy of and we will take comments on them in just a minute, but I am going to have our Deputy City Attorney, Ted Baird, who has Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 6 of 20 been working very diligently and thank you very much Ted and have him discuss the standards and part of that negotiation. Baird: Thank you Councilmember Wardle and members of the Council. As we went through the process of discussing the city's expectations with the potential new operator, one of the problems that we did identify with the existing agreement was the total lack of teeth in the maintenance standards. The current language just merely refers to maintenance at the level of similar municipal golf courses in the area. So, what we thought we would do is since the city has the opportunity to approve a new — an assumption of the lease that we would take the opportunity to add some additional maintenance terms. I do have a two page handout that's in the back of the room if anybody wants to — if you haven't already picked it up you can pick it up on the way out, but what we attempted to do is set forth a specific standard, our basic aesthetics expectations as well as break it down to the individual maintenance obligations. The second page goes through the number of mowings on various parts of the course per week; how often items should be watered, fertilized, air rated, groomed, how various aspects of the facility should be cleaned, serviced and checked. So, we put specific numerical standards in there that if the public or the City Council or anyone feels that the quality of the maintenance is not up to par, we can go out and monitor it and invoke some of the other remedies that will be in the lease agreement and we have every expectation that these people who will be operating have every intent to improve the facility in the way that they have presented it today, but what we are also looking at is into the future for the next City Council and the next set of residents in the neighborhood as people forget the promises that were made today that we have got a document that's in writing that will be survived for the future and tike I say, we tried to break it down into specific standards. I will stand for questions at this point. Wardle: Thank you, Ted and I just — Dick if you could answer this just in the general question we have had this as part of our discussions, but what sort of dollar figure do you feel have you budgeted to make these improvements, albeit over the course of time, but we are talking a pretty large dollar figure. Davis: Yes, we are talking well in excess of $2 million. Baird: Councilman Wardle if I could add that that was one of other ambiguities in the current agreement is that it was unclear as to who would be paying and in the new agreement we make it clear that the maintenance and the physical improvements will be at no expense to the city or the tax payers that the operators is taking on that full obligation. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 7 of 20 Bird: Yes, Dick, you know we have quite a few people on the back nine that want to put up a membership and it was called a lifetime membership or something. Are you going to continue to honor that? Davis: When they built the back nine? Bird: Yeah, they donated money and stuff and then in return or they bought — Rountree: John can tell you. Bird: Yeah, John Ewing is the one of -- Davis: Well, I don't want John out there -- Bird: But, there are some other nicer guys that do — but there was, 1 think, Mr. Berg is about the only one that was sitting up here that was familiar with that. In fact I think his family bought one of those. Are we — Berg: It was by both parties. Council President Wardle if I could just add a couple of things. The return on investment of money or in kind donations was some kind of membership pass for and I don't remember how many years, if it was ten years or fifteen years or something of that nature to get that back nine improved. John Ewing was one of them that was given some of that in kind donation as well as people that gave monetary and I don't remember the length of time, but both the city and the Cherry bane Recreation signed off on giving that to them. Of course, the indebtedness is when you go out there to play golf the city isn't the operator at the time, so it is the Cherry lane Golf course that really pays for the use of that pass and I don't remember how many passes were given out, it depended on how much money or in kind donation there was. Davis: We would certainly look at that Keith and yeah, I don't know what it would entail, but I did hear that John and Terry got one -- (Inaudible speaker and discussion) Davis. We could have a father son out there — Speaker?: I believe the agreement though was made by the City of Meridian, not — so whatever you work out is fine, I certainly didn't come to claim that out. That is fine, but I think the agreement was not made you know with (inaudible) the City of Meridian and again, I don't truthfully know if anybody that I just named there that (inaudible------). I shouldn't say they don't (inaudible ---) that is something that if it becomes an issue we could certainly be worked out on my part, I can't speak for the other ones, but I don't think the other ones probably don't even know (inaudible--------). l Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 8 of 20 Davis: John and I and Terry Cook from Cloverdale and the people from Nampa Paving we have a father son golf tournament every year, so that's why I was joking about the father son golf tournament. Wardle: One of the things that I would just like to point to is the process that we are going through. This is the first and we are going to take some public testimony in just a minute — this is the first kind of announcement -- Friday's paper and the Mayor's State of the City Address was probably the first time that anyone had heard some of these negotiations were going on and so this is the first opportunity for the new operator to present this. They have got some due diligence that obviously they are doing with the current tenant and what will happen is we will bring this forward April 2&, 1 am working with the Clerk's Office, but at 6:30 P.M. in a Pre -Council setting here for some official action from the City Council. So, what we will be asking this evening for direction for the Council to proceed forward to the 200, we will still be taking and will have opportunity for people to comment from now until then. Is that your understanding, Ted? Baird: That is correct. Wardle: I would like to invite — thank you very much Dick for your presentation and Eric and if we have some questions after if anyone would like we will bring you back up, but I would like to open the floor to anyone that has a comment, a question, anything specific to the standards we would welcome at this time. Gordon? Marguiluex: Gordon Marguiluex, 2040 Interlochen Way in Meridian, Idaho. We live within earshot of the clubhouse and so there is a couple of things that I wanted to just sort of ask and certainly appreciate the work done to try and improve the golf course and Dick seems to be a real nice guy. I haven't met him for a long — but there are a couple things. One is a couple of months ago we were talking about problems with people on the golf course — when it changed the trespassing law and I guess that was sort of put on hold, but it's still an issue because we see people on the golf course, kids particulary walking across and there doesn't seem to be anything done about that. I would like to see what Dick has in mind to do that because I am sure he doesn't want kids getting hit by golf balls also. I don't agree that there should be a trespassing ordinance, but we need to have something that targets them, but I think we do need to address that because it is a safety issue. As to and I want to make sure that what the Council is presenting is that we have the same lease, but we have an addendum to that for the maintenance and is any funds at all going to occur for the city? Of my understanding there isn't other than maintenance -- just the legal stuff of getting it finalized? t Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting Apri15, 2005 Page S of 20 Wardle: At this time, that's what we are talking about and all that the operator — well, I'll let Dick address some of your concerns as soon as you are done, if that's okay with you Gordon? Marguiluex: Yeah. One of the reasons I ask that is that I also remember it wasn't too long ago that the city came up with an agreement with Cherry Lane to share equipment and they were going to — the city was apparently going to buy the equipment and Cherry Lane was going to maintain it or something along that line. This was something that was probably about nine months ago that the city was going to — have gone into an agreement with the golf course and this was again out of the Statesman where they were going to sort of jointly own some equipment and maintain it. Are there fuel tanks that are going to be on the site near the maintenance shed? The reason why is that 1 looked at that sheet of paper that talked about and it's right next to, in fact, the comer that we are talking about is a corner that has open irrigation ditches_ So, there is ditches on two sides of where the shed is going to be and the question is is there any environmental safety stuff that needs to be addressed for that? They are going to be storing pesticides in there. My understanding is it's supposed to be very similar to the shed that is at the golf course right now on Cloverdale, which has I believe a gravel floor or concrete? Concrete, okay, so we need to figure out if that's a safety issue there. Between the time when the old storage area goes and the new one --- they mentioned about a tent — does it need to have any approval for that tent? Especially sense that is going to be visible to the homeowners that are just probably fifty feet away. Another question and 1 am sure this will be brought up at the meeting where we talk about the shed. How tall is the shed? Because it's another issue. There will be people who won't be able to see Bogus Basin because there will be a new shed up there and will there by any barriers? Will they be planting trees? Will they be doing something around it to block the view of that? I don't envision seeing the shed, but other people in the neighborhood had mentioned that. One that concerns me is the thought of creating a bar that is close to a school and also in the area that is not surrounded by berms, the original tent, I believe, when they put in the clubhouse was that they weren't going to have a bar there and thanks to the City Council on the February a they approved the clubhouse to be open 24 hours a day, they made an exception in the noise ordinance that allowed them. The noise ordinance that was approved and should be amended gave an exception sound clause by activities upon any outdoor municipality, which is the golf course, school, religious or publicly owned property, the golf course or provides that such activities authorized by the owner of the property, Dick over here, or facilities of it's agents. So, if he decides he wants to have an all night party according to the ordinance that is an exception and the exception says that they can have anything between eleven at night and six in the morning. That is pretty much, basically, 24 hours a day. I suggest that they amend it to say that any privately owned facilities on public property has to adhere to the — instead of just saying anything on a public owned land. Let's see what else. The time limit for the r Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 10 of 20 lease, is it going to be extended or is it just — you know because it has like 25 more years on it? Is it going to be extended? Donnell: I think that's part of the negotiations. Wardle: Yes, and 1 believe. Do you want me to address your concerns one at a time or just that one specifically? Bird: Mr. President. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Let Ted address the noise thing that he is spouting off about. Wardle: Okay, if we can back up and address the noise ordinance again real quick with our city staff. Ted? Baird: Are we done with the lists? Marguiluex: Oh, no, but I will try and keep it short. If you want to address the noise ordinance, I am just reading it — Baird: If I could start out just by saying we are here to talk about the new operation of the golf course and the assumption of the lease. However, I think that your concerns can be addressed in the document that we are creating that sets forth the new terms upon which the lease will be assumed. The trespass and the safety issue are totally separate from the operation of the golf course and I encourage you to continue to work with the city on your concerns on that. I am going to set that aside as not being relevant to the discussion tonight. However, with the noise and the noise ordinance, the way that the current ordinance is drafted, it talks about activity allowed by the owner of the facility. The city is the owner of the golf course in general and what we intend to do is set specific hours of operation when we sign off on the assumption of the lease. So, if you have concerns about particular hours, I encourage you to put that on the record that your wishes by known. Marguiluex: So be it. That is why I am bringing these up. Certainly my understanding was that we had the old lease with an amendment attached to it and the amendment was basically the maintenance. So, the thing that you were talking about setting different hours or setting extended leases, those are additional pieces that we are taking — Baird: We are taking the opportunity that any ambiguity that currently exists, we are taking this opportunity to fix it within the confines within the terms of the existing lease. So, they are just basically add-ons like you characterized. If I could address the other legal issues very briefly. With regard to any storage and Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 11 of 20 use of chemicals and other environmental conditions, we have got a provision in there that they have agreed to handle it according to all relevant standards and that they are also indemnifying their carrying insurance and indemnifying the city for any spills that may occur or any mishandling, so we have thought about that and we have covered that. They have agreed to comply with any applicable regulation with regards to the maintenance shed and if there is any requirement with the temporary structure I am sure that they will comply with that. Perhaps our Planning and Zoning staff could comment on that as well. Those were the legal issues that I noted, perhaps at this time, Mr. Wardle — Wardle: Let me just an opportunity — for the maintenance facility there will be a separate hearing before this body on the 19th and we haven't seen the plans for the facility and so — Marguiluex: And neither have 1, but they are available. Wardle: Yes, by the 19th for the operator. Your question to the extension of the lease, I believe the operator is asking for an extension and will be asking for that. I'll let them address a specific timeframe if you'd like to do that now or if you have a couple more comments you can make those. Marguiluex: Well (inaudible----). So, what is the extension? Wardle: l believe they are asking to extend it to a thirty-year term. Marguiluex: So, before I forget — so thirty more years or —? Wardle: Twenty-seven, I believe if that's correct and extending that an additional three years. Baird: Those issues are still under negotiations. The request from the operator and I don't want to speak for them and I will let them address this, but it has to do with their ability to seek financing for the infrastructure improvements that they are committing to and that's the only reason we are reopening that term of negotiations. Marguiluex: Because they are the additional things besides the maintenance that's going to be at the addendum, when will that be available for viewing from the public standpoint? Baird: Mr. Wardle. The lease will be on the agenda for the meeting on the 26th and that will be released to the public pursuant to the general release of the agenda that will be available on the Clerk's website when the Clerk posts the agenda for that particular meeting for Friday. Donnell: The Friday before. Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 12 of 20 Marguiluex: The Friday before? Yeah, I didn't know if there was some timeframe that if you were voting or something that you had to have it available to the public. Wardle: It'll be available during public hearing, but the Clerk will have it on the website typically they post it Friday on or about five o'clock and if you would like to talk with Will he can get you the site that you can actually go to and see if it's there. Marguiluex: It's under golf course documents? Wardle: It will actually be under probably the City Council. You go to meetings, go to City Council and then under that agendas. Marguiluex: And why we are at it is it possible to get the slides that were presented on the website, too, under the golf course document files? Wardle: We will ask the operator if they would like that and if — Marguiluex: I think other people would be interested in that. So, I think — with the changes in the lease, is it possible right now because the city receives very little funds from the golf course, in fact, it seems to me that they put in more than they get back. For many years we would get one dollar. I think we are up to like $600 now or $6,000. In Nampa and this has been brought up many times. In Nampa they have a rec center that they built with funds that came back partially from the golf course agreement they had there. I understand that Mr. Davis and his associates are putting in a lot of expense into this golf course. I really appreciate it because it needs it. Maybe we can cut them some slack in the very beginning, but once that six years is over with, whether they hit every hole and is — since we are re -negotiating a contract this seems like it's a pretty good re- negotiation — that we change that maybe we change that maybe 10 percent what they have in Centennial to be able to do that so that we can start using these funds to make more parks because Meridian is getting bigger — to do other things with that. Maybe not a rec center, but maybe something that we could use those funds to better use than to -- $6,000 doesn't seem like very much. Bird: Yes, sir, I would like you to tell me all the money that the city has put into it, since 1978. Marguiluex: Well, I have got to say that they are not always — they get paid back. You know I remember a few years back when they were given to other nine holes that the city loaned the golf course out of the sewer fund. I think it was $300,000 and they did get that money back, not from the golf course, they got it back from impact fees, but they did get that back. I remember also a couple of years later, they were talking to the patrons saying we need to increase our i Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 13 of 20 sewer fee because we our funds are getting kind of low. I am just saying that $6,000 on a golf course lease a year doesn't seem to be bringing back — maybe you can explain to me how a golf course that is rated the worst — that's why I appreciate Mr. Davis's effort to improve this here — the worst golf course in the Valley and how I can go out on the golf course or look over the fence because I don't want to — or get hit by a golf ball. I can look out over the fence and see very few people playing on the golf course. When I talk to people who golf they say I don't play because it's just ugly and why that's a benefit to Meridian. Why Meridian could even look the citizens in the face and say that's our golf course. I mean that's why I am happy to see someone willing to take that and improve it and I am willing to cut them some slack, but $6,000 doesn't seem like a whole lot. What did you do with $6,000 that you got from the golf course last year. Maybe you can answer that. Bird: It went into the Parks general fund and I am sure they — Marguiluex: (Inaudible------) Bird: You are comparing it to Nampa to Ridgecrest and Centennial and they are altogether different. The City of Tampa built those. They should have the returns on them. The Lovan family put all the money into to the course. The city never put any into it until the expansion was done and that was off of impact fees, which has also bought the other Parks we have got around here. That's what impact fees are for. It's for the public deal. These gentlemen are willing to put in a couple of million dollars to improve it. Chert' Lane Golf Course will never be a Centennial, nor will it ever be a Ridgecrest. I don't care if Dick makes it a PGA's standard golf course — the location and the tightness of it does not allow the average the poor golfer like me to score very good, so if we get a chance we are going to go to Centennial where it is wide open. (Tape turned over) Wardle: If there is anyone else that would like some availability or ask the operator to respond we have got just a couple of minutes. Marguiluex: Sorry that it's taking so long, so one of the things that we lacked on the old agreement are consequences for not performing to keep the golf course up. This current agreement does not have consequences in it. It doesn't say what happens if they don't do what they are supposed to do because it doesn't talk about defaults. Also, is there levels because this here agreement right now, back on the -- doesn't say — it just says you will maintain some GPA or USGA standards, but is there different levels of standards? Because right now that was the problem that we had with the old lease. There was nothing to determine how we evaluate standards. Is there a level one, level two, level three? Can we say we want this to be this particular level of standard? These are just questions. Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 14 of 20 Wardle: And if you will give us just a moment, we will take some more input and then I will have the operator and our staff address those specific standards. Marguiluex: I was just wondering on the back here and the schedule and where it came from. Is this a USGA or is this just a list of activity? I am kind of concerned because if they come up with a better way of maintaining the golf course, I don't want to limit them to what's on the backyard. I would rather just say you have this standard, this is how you evaluate it and go with that instead of trying to tell them when to mow the lawn. Bird: Sir, they are businessmen. If it's the improvement and it draws more money for them, they are going to do it, whether that standard is says it or not. Marguiluex: And I certainly hope so. I appreciate your time. Thank you very much. Wardle: Thank you for your comments. Is there anyone else that would like to comment before we bring up the operator and then have Ted maybe address those specific standards? Myers: My name is Burt Meyers, 3540 West Woodmont, Meridian. Among other things I am president of the Cherry Lane 3, 4 and 5 Homeowner's Association, who are very involved with the golf course. I have listened to this for a long time about this lease thing and those of you that weren't here when this thing was put together, which I was, there was nobody that wanted that golf course. Mayor Storey at the time says the city doesn't want a golf course. The developer says well we will give it to you, but nobody wanted to take it. We tried to find people that wanted it and nobody wanted it. (Inaudible ) comes forward and says okay, here is what I will do and he did. Now, I have to say that I am not a lawyer, thank goodness, but from what I understand from talking to some of these guys is that lease was probably not drawn up the best it could have been, but at that time it was the best that we could come up with and it worked and times change. The golf course changed, the people changed, the subdivision changed. All those houses came in there and as Keith says it's pretty dang tight right now. It wasn't so tight then because it wasn't houses then but they still had the out of bounds and things just started going down hill from the developer because he went belly up after he built the first nine, he was supposed to get the other nine in and he didn't come back to do that and that's why it took so long to get it in and finally Mayor Kingsford got this idea that he could get these funds borrowed and get people to donate stuff like the contractor guy over here with a big piece of equipment sitting around and said yeah we could go do that and they got it done and I am going to tell you it probably isn't the best in the world, but it got done. The big thing they have a problem with is they have been talking about is the irrigation system. That was never done right in the first place, but we didn't know that. The developer said here it is and you don't look a pig in the poke, I guess or whatever, but anyway the one question that I have is are you going to keep Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 15 of 20 the season ticket holders and are you going to honor this year? That was most important. Bird: I have a question for Mr. Meyers. Burt, do you know of any time on those irrigation systems that the city put any money into that old original nine that Wally — I mean, Wally put every penny that went into that thing after the bankruptcy — I mean, am I not right? Meyers: That's right. The city never put a nickel into it. Wardle: Is there anyone else that would like to come forward? Mr. Davis, Mr. Oas if you would like to address some of those specifically. I think Burt had a specific question for you. Davis: There was one that we weren't going to renew. Now all season passes are going to be honored, all pro -shop credits are going to be honored and if you have got some pro -shop credits from the tournament or something, those will all be honored. So, don't worry about that. Passes are all honored. Okay, now let's see — the terms of the lease, what we have asked for is we are investing $2.5 million dollars in this thing and that's a substantial amount of money even to a guy like John Ewing and you know we are business people like he said. We need some return on our investment and we are willing to take this thing and run with it and make a jewel out of it and yes there are — we have all of these parameters that we have to live by and Ted and I and another documenter — there are some hand slapping things if we don't get — we can get our lease jerked from us if we don't maintain it properly, so there is some teeth in the total agreement on this thing. We are asking for a 30 -year lease, with a 30 -year renewal for us to be able to get our money back out of it. We haven't got it, but that's what we are asking for. So, there are plenty of standards. As far as the height of the building, the building is 15 feet tall, the maintenance facilities that we are proposing. A golf course has to have a maintenance facility that you can use. Where you put it, is up in the air, but if you don't have some place to put your equipment and take care of it (inaudible). So, I don't think the residents would like us repairing under a shade tree, which is what we are going to have to do for a couple of months, but anyway, I can't think of anything else. Eric do you have anything to add to that? Oas: The only other item is that we would be more than happy to make our slides available if anyone would like a copy, there is nothing confidential in this. I guess the only other point that I would make to Council and everyone is that although (inaudible) 30 year lease and the extension is critically important and it's critically important because it gives us as Dick pointed out it gives us and the investors who are investing money in (inaudible--------) our dollars will go farther. It gives them an opportunity to get a return. (inaudible----) then we are obviously are not going to be able to attract investors that we need to have. (Inaudible----------------) I Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 16 of 20 Davis: Well, you know and I might add in our budget we are losing a ton of money the first two years because there is no play, but we are going to put on a full maintenance staff. I budgeted the same maintenance staff that we have at Boise Ranch, where we get 42,000 rounds a year. So, the same maintenance staff is budgeted for this. We have got repairs to do. We are going to lose a ton of money for a couple of years out there just to get this thing going right. (Speaker unknown): Inaudible-------------------). Davis: They are probably going to go up a little bit. We are not going to go crazy with this because like he said we are business people. You know you can't price it more than the market will bear, but we are immediately going to do some improvements there so the green fees probably will change. Oas: Anyone who would like to have copies of the slides please, let me know, give me the name — we have a couple copies here, but we would be more than happy to get more. Wardle: Thank you very much. Any other comments from Council? I would encourage anyone who would like to contact the city, certainly can contact me direct and if you would like to stick around for just a moment, I believe that Eric and Dick would give some contact information for ou as well. The public hearing on the maintenance facility is again on the 19'' and then I am hopefully going to entertain a motion in just a minute to move to the 26th and have all those documents available for potential decision by the Council. With that, Council, do I hear a motion to -- Bird: Mr. President. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we bring back on April 26, 2006, the negotiated contract with the new leasing of the Meridian golf course. Donnell: Second. Wardle: Thank you very much. We have motioned and seconded and I will take a roll call vote, Mr. Clerk. Roll Call Vote: Bird, aye; Donnell, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye. All ayes ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Rountree: Mr. President. f Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting Aprii 5, 2005 Page 17 of 20 Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I guess the final comment on my part is one I appreciate the gentlemen stepping up and moving forward on the golf course, but now that everybody is milling around I wanted to express my gratitude to the Council President for taking this ball that I tossed in his direction about a little over a year ago and a job well done. Thank you Shaun. Wardle: Mr. Berg. Berg: Thank you Mr. President. I direct this to Ted a little bit, but we did have a conditional use on the clubhouse when that was negotiated and built and there is some conditions put on that clubhouse for operation time and things of that nature and we will get that information to you, so you can review that because there are conditions that were put in because there was a residential area and it's expected to have a bar and restaurant in that clubhouse. Donnell: Thank you Clerk Berg. Item 4. Communities in Motion Presentation by Brad Hawkins -Clark: Hawkins -Clark: Well, it's not mine, so if I could just pass out a couple of handouts. If I could just have one minute to set up the slide here, please. Wardle: That's fine. Thanks Brad. Let's just take a quick five-minute recess. Recess, Wardle: I would like to bring us back to order. Again, Item No. 4, Brad Hawkins - Clark Communities in Motion. Hawkins -Clark: Sorry about that. So, this ten-minute talk which was supposed to be 20, which was originally intended to be half an hour or 30. 1 guess maybe need a little direction. How much would you — do you already understand? This arrangement between the Communities in Motion process and the blueprint for good growth. You are familiar with it and the relationship between the two? Rountree: I don't know anything about it. Hawkins -Clark: Well, you can just put deaf ears on. Why don't I hit about five slides in this handout here. One of the things that we are trying to do just now is to get DVD hooked up as well as this PowerPoint overhead, but there is a video that COMPASS has just recently had available to them that we will certainly make it available to the Council to see, but it's an 11 minute summation basically of these public workshops that initiated this process. I saw just a little bit of it, it looks very good. It's a good summary, so we will get that to you so you can Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 18 of 20 watch those on your own, but I think a couple of points to make on these two processes the why in terms of what's driving this whole process is on the second page there and largely the projection of population going from approximately 500,000 a day to 920,000. Employment increasing basically almost double. The Communities in Motion, of course, is a process that's largely transportation oriented, the Blueprint for good growth largely land use oriented. Elements of each are woven into those, As you know we have got a couple of scenarios, this is scenario planning that are sort of been the focus up to this point in the process and on page 5 of the handout on the top there the slide kind of highlights the difference between these two. (inaudible) scenario is important to both of these processes. The Blueprint for good growth is going to focus on the tools to implement that and then the transportation of course is Communities in Motion. I think maybe what would be most helpful at this point is that you know that coming up on the 18th COMPASS Board is going to have on their agenda whether or not they decided, I guess, is a little bit up in the air right now, but a decision on the preferred scenario. It has been boiled down to two and both of those scenarios are kind of broken out in this hand out and again we have got all kinds of background and data on them, but they start on page 12 of the handout in terms of telling you what the difference is between this mixed use corridor and the blended and in the most simplistic terms possible, the mixed use corridor is saying we want the growth to be largely oriented around our state highways and some of our principal arterials — State Highway 44, Chinden, 20/26, Union Pacific, 1-84 and let's put a lot of growth in those areas. It involves more infill than the other scenario and it is going to require more multi family housing in the future. The other scenario is a little bit more focused on the areas of city impact, not quite so dense, not quite so much focus on multi family housing. Again, this is very simplistic, but the other thing to keep in mind is that we probably not just choosing these two scenarios. Ideally, we will come up with yet another one that will be as Trish Neilson mentioned today that the plan ultimately is what we are striving for here. The scenarios are trying to say it a simple way, here's kind of the principles of each. I think the comments that this group is looking for and that it will be decided by COMPASS on April 18t", what the preferred scenario will be is largely are you in support of this mixed-use corridor that has a more equal housing mix or are you more inclined to this blended scenario which also is quite a different growth pattern than what this Valley has had to date. I think both will bring challenges and a lot of opportunity for us, but there are key elements of both. If you have studied them at all and the maps are in this handout, you will see that actually north Meridian and Meridian in general is pretty under populated. They recognize that so you probably don't need to spend too much time commenting on that because I think everyone recognizes that the numbers so far have shown that to be pretty under populated given the platting that we have seen in the city. So, I think some of that is going to be tweaked, but on a broader scale do you think that the region as a whole can have those growth patterns, one or the other and I think giving comments to the Mayor before the 18th would be good while also on Monday a week from yesterday, we are going to be focusing on these so if you could take just a few minutes and call us at the Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 19 of 20 P&Z Department or email us or whatever and say if you have concerns that you want us to bring up Monday with the consultants, we are going to be focusing in on a little bit more on just Meridian. So far this is a sixth county project, the Communities in Motion is and we are going to try and focus a little bit more on what is the background to the Meridian growth and so we can bring your concerns to that meeting and then hopefully pass that on for the COMPASS Board meeting, which is going to follow a couple of days after that. There are a couple of handouts here that gives you the web address and the phone numbers of the consultants who are working on both the Communities in Motion and Blueprint for Good Growth so it's a nice easy handout and reference for you. I will hand that out and if you have got any questions, I guess that's about all the time we have got. Wardle: Council, do you have any questions for Brad at this time? Bird: I do not, Mr. President. Donnell: Mr. President. Wardle: Ms. Donnell. Donnell: Brad, did I understand you to say that -- go back to your comment about Meridian being under populated. Did I hear you say that? Hawkins -Clark: Right. Donnell: Which — all of Meridian? A certain part of Meridian? Say that again to me. Hawkins -Clark: Sure. Rountree: Explain what you mean by that. I know what you mean, but I know where Christine is coming from. Hawkins -Clark: One of the things that they do or have done that the consultants have done is at these workshops they took — here's all these chips, this is the big map, this is where we think rural should go, residential — we want to protect this area, we want to preserve this area, let's put this here. !What the consultants do is they kind of just took these maps that were done at 44 or 45 tables, 500 participants and started to digitize all of this information and put it into the computer and come up with general land use categories and those land use categories then get applied at least in this case for Meridian at certain densities and they came in at much lower densities — a state type densities for our north Meridian area like one dwelling unit per acre verses what we already been approved at, you know around 3 or 3 % dwelling units per acre. So, it's showing Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting April 5, 2005 Page 20 of 20 projected population to be less than what we even already have on the books let alone is that really what we want. So, does that help? Donnell: Yes, it does. Thank you. Hawkins-Clark: Meridian Development Corporation did have a presentation by Steve, I think, just this week and they talked a little bit more specifically about the effects of these plans on downtown. He did have some more information that focused you know kind of on that discussion, but that information is available. just wanted to point that out. Wardle: Thank you. Anything else from Brad? Brad thank you very much for your presentation. Hawkins-Clark: Here are the forms for you. Wardle: We will be sure to get our comments back to you and appreciate the good presentation in a short amount of time. Rountree: Way to be concise. Wardle: Council, with that that brings us to end of our agenda and I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All in favor? ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED, MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:58 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROV TAMMY D , MAYOR DATE APPROVED,m,: weGp,,,R9-. _ ATTESTE WILLIAM G. BERG, dITYJX.,K vat y CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll -call Attendance: X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird O Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance: Lead by Shaun Wardle, City Council President 3. Community Invocation by Glen Olson, with LDS Church: Presented 4. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended 5. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Pre -Council Meeting: Approve B. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: Approve C. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: Approve D. Streetlight Agreement for Sutherland Farm No. 4 by Great Sky, ,,.. Inc.: Approve E. Sewer Reimbursement Request by Dan Richards: Approve Negotiation F. Ustick and Linder Sewer „Design Agreement with Engineering Northwest: Approve G. Design of Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Creek Sewer Crossing Agreement with Erickson Civil, Inc. Approve, H. Water Master Plan Agreement with CH2M Hill: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda --January 7, 2003 Page l of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. I. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Central Valle Corporate Park No. 7: Approve J. Approve Beer, Wine, and Liquor License Renewals: Approve Lotus Garden Chinese Restaurant — Beer The Backwater Saloon — Liquor Bill N Lynn's Back Room — Liquor Meridian Bowling Lanes — Beer & Liquor Fiesta Guadalajara — Beer & Liquor Epi's a Basque Restaurant — Beer & Wine Winco Foods #48 — Beer & Wine Primo's — Beer San Francisco Sourdough Eatery — Beer Rite Aid #5412 — Beer & Wine El Tenampa — Beer & Liquor Big Smoke — Beer & Wine The Cigarette Store -- Beer Ultra Touch Car Wash -- Beer Corona Village — Beer & Liquor Goodwood Barbecue Company — Beer & Liquor K. Development and Temporary License Agreement for Snake River Racing Club's Remote Control Race Track: Approve L. Professional Services Agreement for Real Estate Acquisition Services, The Igo Company.: Approve M. Approve Bills: Approve 6. Department Reports: A. City Council President — Shaun Wardle 1. Proclamation for Fair Housing Month: Proclamation 1 Read 2. Welcome Fire Chief Ron Anderson: B. City Attorney — Bill Nary 1. Proposed Ordinance for Solid Waste Collection Program: Place on Next Meeting Agenda April 12, 2005 2. Tabled from March 29, 2005: Proposed Draft Ordinance for License Alcohol Establishments and Prohibiting Two Meridian City Council Agenda -- January 7, 2003 Page 2 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of (lie City or Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 'License Establishments within the Same Premise: Proceed on Next Meeting 3. Zoning Amendment to Ada County by Boise City 7. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) Item E 8. FP 05-023 Request for Final Plat approval of 42 single-family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 12.24 acres in a R-8 zone for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 by Packard Estates Development, LLC — east of North Eagle Road and south of East Ustick Road: Approve 9. FP 05-022 Request for Final Plat approval for 70 building lots (single- family residential and office lots) and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres in R- 4 and L -O zones for Strada Bellissima Subdivision No. 1 by Dave Evans Construction Management — northwest corner of Victory Road and Meridian Road: Approve "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 10. Public Hearing: Parks and Recreation New Fees: Prepare Resolution for Approval Fees 11. Public Hearing: Revisions to the Parks Capital _Improvement _Plan: Open and Closed 12. Resolution No. 05-467 Resolution Approving Update to Parks and Recreation Capital improvements Plan: Approve 13. Public Hearing: Amendment to the Park Impact Fee Methodology and Increase to Park Impact Fee Schedule: Open and Closed 14. Ordinance No. 05-1138 Revisions to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Methodology and the Park and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule: Approve 15. Public Hearing: AZ 05-001 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of 156.49 acres to R-8 & L -O zones for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 16. Public Hearing: PP 05-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 429 building lots and 35 common lots on 155.44 acres in proposed R-8 and L - Meridian City Council Agenda --January 7, 2003 Page 3 or5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian, Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Orficc at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. O zones for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 17. Public Hearing: CUP 05-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development consisting of 428 residential building lots, one church lot and 35 common lots located in a "mixed-use neighborhood center" designation on the Comprehensive Plan for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road. Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 18. Public Hearing: CUP 04-056 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for two separate drive -up windows in a C -C zone for Jade Plaza by Sundance Investments, LLP — 3679 East Overland Road: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 19. Public Hearing: CUP 05-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a credit union facility with a drive-thru in a C -C zone for Westmark Credit Union by Westmark Credit Union — SEC of Eagle & Overland Road in The Silverstone Corporate Center: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 20. Public Hearing: PP 05-005 Request to amend the Preliminary Plat (PP 02-007) to add seven additional building lots for Heritage Commons by Brighton Investments, LLC — west of Locust Grove Road and north of Ustick Road: Approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 21. Public Hearing: CUP 05-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a mixed use three story building consisting of retail, office and residential uses in the O -T zone for Dave Buich by Dave Buich — 641 North Main Street: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 22. Public Hearing: VAR 05-003 Request for a Variance for a reduction in parking requirements for a proposed three-story mixed-use project for Dave Buich by Dave Buich — 641 North Main Street: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval 23. Public Hearing: VAR 05-006 Request for a Variance for a time extension to record the Final Plat for Setter Cover for, Setter Cove Subdivision by MKH Development, Inc. — north of East Ustick Road and North Locust Grove Road: Prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval Meridian City Council Agenda —January 7, 2003 Page 4 of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 24. Water, Sewer, & Trash Delinquencies: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda — January 7, 2003 Page 5 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of tate City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll -call Attendance: Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance: let' -d %") Slsaat' 4(1An4t e, C-16 6a&7-6'-4 3. Community Invocation by Glen Olson, with LDS Church: 4. Adoption of the Agenda: ar 5. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Pre -Council Meeting: oi)arr"V-<- B. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: C. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: D. .g Streetlfi ht A_g reement for, Sutherland Farm No. 4 by Great Sky, IncInc.: .. �''6" -- E. Sewer Reimbursement Request by„Dan Richards: F. _Ustick and Linder Sewer Design Agreement with Engineering Northwest: 0907`v ,,,.cam G. Design of Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Creek Sewer Crossing Agreement with Erickson Civil, Inc.: app.,., 6-e_, H. Water Master Plan Agreement with CH2M Hill: -�- I. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Central Valle Corporate Park No. 7: Ajr"-0 J. Approve Beer, Wine, and Liquor License Renewals: 4,P/ Meridian City Council Agenda —January 7, 2003 Page 1 o174 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. t Lotus Garden Chinese Restaurant — Beer The Backwater Saloon — Liquor Bill N Lynn's Back Room — Liquor Meridian Bowling Lanes — Beer & Liquor Fiesta Guadalajara — Beer & Liquor Epi's a Basque Restaurant — Beer & Wine Winco Foods #48 — Beer & Wine Primo's — Beer San Francisco Sourdough Eatery — Beer Rite Aid #5412 — Beer & Wine EI Tenampa — Beer & Liquor Big Smoke — Beer & Wine The Cigarette Store — Beer Ultra Touch Car Wash — Beer Corona Village — Beer & Liquor Goodwood Barbecue Company — Beer & Liquor K. Development and Temporary License Agreement for Snake River Racing Club's Remote Control Race Track: wv L. Professional Services Agreement for Real Estate Acquisition Services, The Igo Company.: a7ry, ov-e--- M. Approve Bills: �rpw 6. Department Reports: A. City Council President — Shaun Wardle 1. Proclamation for Fair Housing Month: prt��iai�=+ecc. f ria cL B. City Attorney — Bill Nary 1. Proposed Ordinance for Solid Waste Collection Program; 2. Tabled from March 29, 2005: Proposed Draft Ordinance for License Alcohol Establishments and Prohibitina Two License Establishments within the Same Premise: 3. .�-�cn- (items Moved from Consent Agenda) / i.,•►z. E 8. FP 05-023 Request for Final Plat approval of 42 single-family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 12.24 acres in a R-8 zone for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 by Packard Estates Meridian City Council Agenda — January 7, 2003 Page 2 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Development, LLC — east of North Eagle Road and south of East Ustick Road: v.c- 9. FP 05-022 Request for Final Plat approval for 70 building lots (single- family residential and office lots) and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres in R- 4 and L -O zones for Strada Bellissima Subdivision No. 1 by Dave Evans Construction Management — northwest corner of Victory Road and Meridian Road: vc_. "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter. " 10. Public Hearing: Parks and Recreation New Fees: /Le Ar f 11. Public Hearing: Revisions to the Parks Capital Improvement Plan: oo-ea �alos-ed 12. Resolution No. L195- x-47 : Resolution Approving Update to _Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan: 13. Public Hearing: Amendment to the Park_Impact Fee Methodology and Increase to Park Impact Fee Schedule: �,�pf a%Fe 14. Ordinance No. off— �r38 : Revisions to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Methodology and the Park and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule: 15. Public Hearing: AZ 05-001 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of 156.49 acres to R-8 & L -O zones for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: /9rePalv— -ll- �, cl-e qrzr ; -ava.f. 16. Public Hearing: PP 05-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 429 building lots and 35 common lots on 155.44 acres in proposed R-8 and L- O zones for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC -- SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: 17. Public Hearing: CUP 05-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development consisting of 428 residential building lots, one church lot and 35 common lots located in a "mixed-use neighborhood center" designation on the Comprehensive Plan for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: rrre�p 4-,x- 7eY,4 ay/ CU a t9v.L� 18. Public Hearing: CUP 04-056 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for two separate drive -up windows in a C -C zone for Jade Plaza by Sundance Investments, LLP -3679 East Overland Road: Meridian City Council Agenda — January 7, 2003 Page 3 of 4 14r 4W All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 howl prior to the public meeting. 19. Public Hearing: CUP 05-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a credit union facility with a drive-thru in a C-C zone for Westmark Credit Union by Westmark Credit Union — SEC of Eagle & Overland Road in The Silverstone Corporate Center: 20. Public Hearing: PP 05-005 Request to amend the Preliminary Plat (PP 02-007) to add seven additional building lots for Heritage Commons by Brighton Investments, LLC — west of Locust Grove Road and north of Ustick Road: v%4, -eer,(14-r- oclvl, 21. Public Hearing: CUP 05-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a mixed use three story building consisting of retail, office and residential uses in the O-T zone for Dave Buich by Dave Buich — 641 North Main Street: 7qec-sK c4e 14,4/ VWL. .- 22. Public Hearing: VAR 05-003 Request for a Variance for a reduction in parking requirements for a proposed three-story mixed-use project for Dave Buich by Dave Buich — 641 North Main Street: 23. Public Hearing: VAR 05-006 Request for a Variance for a time extension to record the Final Plat for Setter Cover for Setter Cove Subdivision by MKH Development, Inc. — north of East Ustick Road and North Locust Grove Road: frepot,,-,t lql-' t Cl e go 7y- 24. Water, Sewer, & Trash Delinquencies: Meridian City Council Agenda — January 7, 2003 Page 4 of4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 howl prior to the public meeting. April 22, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 26, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-A REQUEST Approve Minutes of April 5, 2005 City Council Regular Meeting AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS arf T-9 r -L/ Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Meridian City Council Meeting Aril 5 2005. The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, April 5, 2005, by Council President Shaun Wardle. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle, Charlie Rountree, and Christine Donnell. Members Absent: Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Others Present: Bill Nary, Ted Baird, Will Berg, Brad Watson, Brad Hawkins -Clark, Bill Musser, Ron Anderson, Doug Strong, Catrina Thomas, and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird Mayor Tammy de Weerd Wardle: All right. I'd like to welcome everyone to the regular City Council meeting for Tuesday, April 5th, 2005, and I will begin with roll call attendance. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance: Wardle: Thank you. And the Mayor is at another meeting. She had a conflict, is doing some economic development work, so I will be chairing this meeting. Thank you all for joining us and if you will, please, stand and join me in the pledge of allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Glen Olson, with LDS Church: Wardle: I'd now like to invite Glen Olson with the LDS church for a community invocation. Olson: Our Father, we are grateful to be gathered together here in this meeting. We appreciate these comfortable circumstances we have. We are grateful for our freedom that we have to meet and to govern ourselves accordingly. We are grateful, Father, for those that have given of their time and talents to be here and also their ability that we might be a better community. We are grateful for their service and pray that they weigh decisions this evening, particularly, that they would be inspired, that they might have vision for the community. Bless and prosper them. We pray, Father, for those who are in harm's way, who serve our community on a regular basis, the police and fire people. We pray that thou wilt protect them. We are grateful for their service and protection. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 2 of 58 Again, we thank thee for the blessings, which we have of living here, for the fine community that we have, and we pray in the name of Jesus Christ, amen. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda: Wardle: Thank you very much, Glen. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: On the Consent Agenda, it's been requested by the Public Works director to move Item E to under department reports, which will be Item C, Public Works, and we will move it to there and -- Mr. Berg. Berg: Mr. Bird, if I could just ask for just a point of clarification. We have the item that we move consent items under. Could that be appropriate, so we can keep them in order? Bird: You bet. We don't have to put it under -- we can just put it under -- make it 7-E. Berg: Thank you. That makes it a little easier to keep the agenda -- Bird: That is great. And, then, we need to add an Item 3 for the city attorney and that's the zoning amendment from Ada County. And with that, the resolution and ordinance number we will get as we come to it. I move that we approve the revised agenda. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve the revised agenda. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Pre -Council Meeting: B. Approve Minutes of March 8, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: C. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting: D. Streetlight Agreement for Sutherland Farm No. 4 by Great Sky, Inc.: F. Ustick and Linder Sewer Design Agreement with Engineering Northwest: Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 3 of 58 G. Design of Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Creek Sewer Crossing Agreement with Erickson Civil ,In ..: c . H. Water Master Plan Agreement with CH2M Hill: I. SanitarT Sewer and Water Main Easement for Central Valle Corporate Park No. 7: J. Approve Beer Wine and Liquor License Renewals: Lotus Garden Chinese Restaurant -- Beer The Backwater Saloon — Liquor Bill N Lynn's Back Room — Liquor Meridian Bowling Lanes — Beer & Liquor Fiesta Guadalajara — Beer & Liquor Epi's a Basque Restaurant — Beer & Wine Winco Foods #48 — Beer & Wine Primo's — Beer San Francisco Sourdough Eatery — Beer Rite Aid #5492 — Beer & Wine EI Tenampa — Beer & Liquor Big Smoke — Beer & Wine The Cigarette Store — Beer Ultra Touch Car Wash — Beer Corona Village — Beer & Liquor Goodwood Barbecue Company -- Beer & Liquor K. Development and Temporary License Agreement for Snake River Racing Club's Remote Control Race Track: L. Professional Services Agreement for Real Estate Acquisition Services, The Igo Company: M. Approve Bills: Wardle: No. 5 is the Consent Agenda. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the Consent Agenda with the one item, E, being moved to 7-E of the regular agenda. Donnell: Second. Wardle: The Consent Agenda has been moved and seconded -- Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 4 of 58 Bird: With the second, I need to add to that. Donnell: Okay. Bird: And for the President to sign and the Clerk to attest on all proper papers. Donnell: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll, please. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Department Reports: A. City Council President — Shaun Wardle 1. Proclamation for Fair Housing Month: Wardle: Item No. 6 is a Department Report. I have a proclamation that I will be reading for Fair Housing Month. Proclamation. Whereas, April 2005 marks the 37th anniversary of the passage of Title A in the Civil Rights Act of 1968, commonly known as the Federal Fair Housing Act and, whereas, the Idaho Human Rights Commission Act has prohibited discrimination in housing since 1969 and, whereas equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin, as a fundamental goal of our nation, state, and city and, whereas, housing is a critical component of family and community health and stability and, whereas, housing choice impacts our children's access to education, our ability to seek and retain employment options, the cultural benefits we enjoy, the extent of our exposure to crime and drugs and the quality of health care we receive in emergencies and, whereas, the laws of this nation and our state seek to insure such a quality for choice for all transactions involving housing and, whereas, ongoing education, outreach and monitoring, are key to raising awareness of fair housing principles, practices, rights, and responsibilities and, whereas, only through continued cooperation, commitment, and support of all ldahoans can barriers to fair housing be removed, therefore, I, Shaun Wardle, City Council President of the City of Meridian, do hereby proclaim April to be Fair Housing Month in the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho. Thank you. Rountree: Good job. Wardle: My first proclamation. Thank you. And also just as a side note, as my department report, I would like to welcome our new fire chief Ron Anderson to our -- to his first City Council meeting in that official capacity. Welcome, Ron. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 5 of 58 B. City Attorney — Bill Nary 1. Proposed Ordinance for Solid Waste Collection Program: Wardle: Item 6-B is Department Reports from the City Attorney. Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, the first item on there is a proposed ordinance for solid waste collection. We had a discussion last week very briefly. Councilmember Rountree wasn't here for that discussion. We put it back on as a department report, because didn't have it on laser -fiche last week, we just had some copies, didn't make it to everyone. I did get them sent out again by the end of last week and it is on your laser -fiche. I think Mr. Sedlecek was here last week. In our discussion these were not significant changes, there is some, essentially, clean up. We did add some other information to the ordinance basically dealing with some scope and authority and purpose statements and things like that. If it's adequate, Council, I would simply ask that we just move it forward to the agenda next week for passage. Bird: So moved, Mr. President, Donnell: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to move the solid waste collection program ordinance forward to the Consent Agenda next week. All in favor of that motion? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 2. Tabled from March 29, 2005: Proposed Draft Ordinance for License Alcohol Establishments and Prohibiting Two License Establishments within the Same Premise: Wardle: Thank you very much. Mr. Nary, Item No. 2. Nary: Thank you. Mr. President, Members of the Council, the second item was tabled from last week. You might recall we had a lengthy discussion on licensing establishments within the city. Prior to that discussion -- this was on our department report -- you had previously requested a proposed draft ordinance to consider whether or not allowing two licensed establishments within the same facility, essentially, a bar - within -a -bar discussion we had last week. I have made some amendments to this ordinance. If you want to consider it, basically, the concerns have been is how to enforce or how to deal with allowing two of these licensed establishments within the same facility. The way I tried to distinguish that in this draft ordinance was that each of the facilities would have to have their own separate address. That way we would have some method at least to assure where the location was, as well as requiring that they provide a footprint to the police as part of the application process, so we would be sure Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 6 of 58 that each -- that one physical address would -- there would only be one license for one physical address. If you have any questions, at your pleasure, as to what you want to do with the ordinance from this point. Wardle: Thank you. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Two things. Is this ordinance defendable by you and your attorneys? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Councilmember Bird, I wouldn't bring it if it wasn't. Bird: Okay. I thought that. The second one is for Chief Musser. Is he comfortable with it? Musser: Council President Wardle, Members of the Council, Councilman Bird, if it's the same one that I reviewed last week on it, my message back to our attorney at that time was that I thought it would meet all concerns, because it does leave some latitude for Mayoral and Council discretion within it as well. So, the police department can work with it. Bird: With that, Mr. President, I would move that we bring that forward for an ordinance reading at the next available meeting. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded -- I'm going to bring some discussion forward and Mr. Nary and I talked about this. The proposed ordinance that is in front of us is a proposal to prevent the decisions which we made last week from happening and I'm not -- my recollection of Mr. Nary's comments before was when we didn't have all the information in front of us about the specific applications, we looked at how we could alter our city ordinance to prevent those kinds of applications. And so one of the things that I heard in the discussion about those individual liquor licenses and discrepancy between our city ordinances and the state requirements was that we were comfortable allowing those -- those specific users on a case-by-case basis. This ordinance, as I read it, would -- would prevent some of those; is that correct, Mr. Nary? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, yeah, there is probably one thing I will have to verify is on the street addressing and how that particular address is attached. I believe it's attached, actually, by the city and, then, transmitted to the postmaster, but, for example, on those -- two of those applications last week, the Backwater Saloon and the Top Shelf application, unless they could have a separate address, which means they at least need to have a separate entrance, rather than the main entrance, to at Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 7 of 58 least have a separate doorway entrance to the facility, they could still have the same premise internally, it's just that where the physical location of it would be addressed from would be the only difference. Would that prohibit those two facilities? I'm not positive, because, again, I don't know the layouts of either of those places to know whether or not they could actually get a separate physical address, but other than that the layout internally wouldn't change, but the reason we are having this discussion is because we are allowed by state code to create other licensing provisions beyond what the state has. All we had prior to this code would simply be the conditional use requirements and that's what the discussion was last week. This would simple at least require a little bit more definition of the location, which I think is what the police concern was from the enforcement perspective is just some specificity of the location and, again, I think it would require a separate entrance. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: How would a separate entrance in terms of having more than one address at the same fairly -- at least pretty much at the same location, be any different than some of the houses that are converted into apartments, that the occupants go in the front door, but on that front door is -- are several different numbers? It seems to me that that could -- that still could be allowed, even under this ordinance; is that right? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Councilmember Donnell, certainly, if they are distinguishable enough to be able to address them separately, like in that -- I thought of the same example, because I used to live in an A and the half was below me. So, I understand that you can address them separately. I think all we were trying to accomplish in this is making sure we had very clear specifications of where the location of the serving establishment is, so that we had some clearer definition for the police enforcement purposes. But, yes, you could have one entrance that may have multiple entrances internally. It would allow still under, for example, the Meridian Marketplace that's being built just south of here, has multiple store fronts and different doors that will have different addresses, sometimes you will have facilities that will have one address within an A or a B or a C, all of those things I think would perfectly still be allowed, as long as you could physically identify the location more specifically than we have had it. The other suggestion, Council, I would have is we routinely on ordinances are not required by state law to have public hearings on ordinances, but this one may be one you may want to consider, rather than bringing it forward once and waiving the reading rules, which we do on a number of occasions, not doing that on this one. You may want to have this on your agenda for the specified three readings under the state code and maybe inviting public comment at one of those readings. The second reading is generally easier, so if you do want to make changes, you can do it before the third reading. But just a suggestion, but since we did have some people, there may be other comment out there that we are unaware of that might be -- might be helpful to you on whether to pass this or not. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 8 of 58 Donnell: Follow up, Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: The next question I would have is about those that we have already approved that may or may not have a separate entrance. Those are still approved? I mean they don't lose that license, since we have already done that prior to this ordinance being in place; right? Nary: Mr. President, Councilmember Donnell, yes, they would still be in place. There wouldn't be any issue. The only issue would be in their renewal next year, they may need to have a separate entrance put in or something to that nature. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Yeah, Mr. President. I agree that I think we need to have this as a three readings and have the public comment on probably the second one. 1 think it's -- 1, for one, the only reason I voted in affirmative last week was because of the fact that we were -- we were over the barrel, to put it bluntly, but getting back to another thought that I have got, I think there is a lot of these ordinances that we need to have public hearings on that can give us some -- maybe some ideas that a year from now we are not scrambling to change it or something. So, I think that's a very good idea that Mr. Nary brought up to have a public hearing on this and -- but I think we need, like the motion said, to move forward and get it going. Wardle: Then, for clarification for the motion, would it be the maker's preference to bring that forward for a full set of public hearings and not be written with suspension of rules? Bird: Yes, it would be from the maker's -- I don't know what the second -- Rountree: To have a first hearing -- first reading. Wardle: First reading? And second agrees? Donnell: Do you agree? Rountree: I agree. Donnell: You were the second. Wardle: Thank you very much. I have a motion on the table to bring forward an ordinance -- proposed draft ordinance License Alcohol Establishments and prohibiting two licensed establishments within the same premise for a first reading. All in favor of the motion? All opposed? Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 9 of 58 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 3. City Attorney — Ada County zoning code. Wardle: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Nary, for bringing that forward. Item No. 3 on the city attorney's report, zoning ordinance -- or, excuse me, zoning amendment. Nary: Thank you, Mr. President, Members of the Council. I have passed out to you a proposed amendment to the Ada County zoning code. This has been brought to Mayor de Weerd's attention from Mayor Bieter of the city of Boise. They are having a joint meeting with the county commission this Thursday and he was seeking input or support from the other cities in this county. He had forwarded this proposed amendment to all of the cities and Mayor de Weerd couldn't be here tonight, so she asked me to pass this on to you for your comment. Basically, this is asking for some limitations on growth outside of the city's -- outside of incorporated cities into the unincorporated areas of Ada County, that it be limited to no more than five percent -- basically includes 95 percent of all the growth in the area of city impact and limiting growth outside of the areas of city impact to no more than five percent. I did ask Mrs. Canning from Planning and Zoning today to provide some comment, because she wasn't able to be here tonight either, and, basically, the comment that she forwarded back to me was that the growth limitations sometimes are difficult at best to enforce without some mechanism within the ordinance to provide some structure to that. This amendment doesn't provide that, but besides that, there is also a direction to this to revisit the Ada County -- the Ada County ordinance in regards to future land use and that hasn't been done, a Comprehensive Plan review has not -- hasn't been done in a number of years and Mrs. Canning's thought was that that would be helpful and that's something the city should be supporting that type of visit. Basically, I will just read you very briefly. It says: Growth management caps are complicated things to legislate. The user requires some sort of lottery or other apportioning system to establish who gets permits for the year, but the proposed changes to the Ada County comprehensive plan may be worthwhile. The county hasn't updated their plan in a long time, so it may be an appropriate time to do that and so that's where she thought maybe the city might put its support behind. Not asking, really, for any input. If you have any direction or input you wish to provide to Mayor de Weerd tomorrow, so she could get back to Mayor Bieter before their meeting on Thursday, I think would be welcomed by the Mayor, but I wasn't asking the Council to take any action tonight, I was just going to pass that out for your review and if there is questions you have either of me or planning, certainly would be available tomorrow for that and, again, if you had any comments for the Mayor, I think that's all she was seeking. Wardle: Thank you, Mr. Nary. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 10 of 58 Rountree: Question for Mr. Nary. Explain to me again the genesis of this? This is coming from the city of Boise? Nary: Mr. President, Councilmember Rountree, yes, this is city of Boise's proposal in trying to limit some of the growth outside of the boundaries of the incorporated city. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I'm just going to be blunt to prevent SunCor? Bird: I beg your pardon? Donnell: Is this to prevent SunCor development? Nary: Mr. President, Councilmember Donnell, it certainly would impact a development like - Donnell: It certainly would. Wardle: Thank you, Mr. Nary. My -- having just received this document just before the agenda, adding it to the agenda as an additional item, I would prefer that we take additional time to review this, have our staff take additional time to review this, and not to make an official Council comment at this time, unless anyone else would have a similar motion. Rountree: Mr. President, I have a follow up for Mr. Nary. Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: It's not necessarily along those lines, but it seems to me what -- what's the investment that the city might have to make in something like this? It seems to me that if the county is not proposing an amendment to their comprehensive plan or their ordinances, are they open to external suggestions like this or is it worth anybody's political capital to move on this? I don't understand what's going on here. I mean I understand what's going on, but the mechanism to make it work -- Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Councilmember Rountree, I mean that's a very valid question. Mayor de Weerd basically received this e-mail, she forwarded it to me from Mayor Bieter today, so I don't know that there was a lot of prior discussion or analysis that was afforded to any of the cities -- that the role would be or how receptive the county would be to that suggestion from the city and whether or not this really impacts the city of Meridian. My very initial review of this -- and Mr. Baird and I both discussed it very briefly today, this doesn't probably impact the city of Meridian greatly. It may impact the city of Boise tremendously and that may be their interest. But it f - Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 11 of 58 doesn't necessarily appear that it has a lot to do with the city of Meridian. There may be other things that the city may have that type of discussion with the county that might be of more benefit in looking at a partnership and working relationship with, but I think that's, really, your call. Bird: Madam Mayor? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: If I may, I'd make a statement. I don't think that we, sitting up here, would like Ada County to come and tell us how to do our comprehensive plan and how much we could have. I'm like you, I really want to digest this before I make a statement. Wardle: Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Nary, for bringing this forward, and if you have additional comments, please, forward them to the Mayor, if you'd like to get it in time for her Thursday conversation, I believe Mr. Nary pointed that out as the deadline for beginning negotiations. Nary: No. The city of Boise and the Ada County commissioners have periodic meetings and that's when their next meeting is. Mayor Bieter indicates in this e-mail that they were bringing this to them to that joint meeting. They did comment that the Blueprints of Growth Process, of course, is also ongoing and that may also answer the same question, too. Item 7: (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) E. Sewer Reimbursement Request by Dan Richards: Wardle: Okay. Thank you very much. Items moved from the Consent Agenda. We have Item 7-E, which is sewer reimbursement request by Dan Richards. Public Works. Brad Watson. Watson: Thank you, Mr. President, Councilmembers. This is an odd little situation that has arisen, there is a single-family residence that's annexed into the city and does not have sewer. It's located in the southwest corner of Tulley Park. It's right here. This is the parking lot that we all know right through here. Anyway, for one reason or another through the development of the park and the development of the subdivision over here, everyone, except the property owner, seemed to believe that this house was on sewer and Mr. Richards is here tonight, he contacted us a month or two ago indicating that his septic system was failing. The issue at hand is whether there is some city responsibility for a portion of the cost to get that house connected to sewer. Another septic permit cannot be issued on this property, because it's within 300 feet of public central sewer. The sewer currently runs up Linder, hangs a right at Chateau, and proceeds down this way towards the Five Mile Trunk that goes through Tulley Park. The structure within -- that's off the map here, the maintenance structure within the park is served by a single point of service that also goes eastward towards the Five Mile drain. There is not a Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 12 of 58 good cost effective way to do this. Tearing up Linder and bringing it up roughly 100, 120 feet to this structure -- I didn't do a real detailed cost estimate, but I would imagine it's in the ten to 15 thousand dollar range. Mr. Richards has solicited quotes from several contractors to install a service, 1 believe, between two houses right here and those estimates are in the neighborhood of 8,000 dollars. So, this is a unique situation. I even went to -- called our former director Gary Smith, asked him if in his years here he had ever run across something like this and he said, no, can't help you. Rountree: He would for a price. Watson: No. He was much more cordial than that. But that was the kind of the message. So, we are here tonight to maybe get some direction or some discussion going. As I mentioned, Mr. Richards is here, if you have any questions for him, or perhaps if he wants to say anything. With that I will entertain any questions. Wardle. Questions for staff? Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Brad, is there a utility easement along Linder? Watson: A general public utility easement? Rountree: Uh-huh. On that side yard. Watson: I believe there is. However, there is a fire hydrant that's located within that easement and there are some other landscaping improvements that would make it fairly difficult. I think if you tucked it closer to the house and came right through here, you might be able to squeak by. But the cost effectiveness of coming through this frontage - - or the frontage of the lot versus coming out in the road, I'm not sure that there is a whole lot of difference. Rountree: Follow up. Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Just for clarification, there is an easement -- utility easement on the side yards between two houses? Watson: I reviewed the plat at one time and believe there is, but I did not bring that plat with me. Rountree: Okay. Thank you. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 13 of 58 Wardle: Other questions for staff? Mr. Richard, would you like to -- Richard: Do you have questions or do you just want me to -- Wardle: If you could state your name and address for the record. Richard: Dan Richard. 8980 South Linder. I do not live at this location. It is a rental. I have owned it approximately four years. But Mr. Watson said that everyone knew except the owner. I'm the owner, but I did not know that it was not hooked up to sewer. In fact, I paid four years of sewer bills from the City of Meridian. I have been reimbursed for that, but, no, when I bought the house I was totally under the understanding that was hooked up to city sewer and it was not -- it is hooked up to city water, there is a water meter and -- you know, so somehow it got hooked up to city water and forgot about the sewer. But to answer your -- I don't know if it's a question or what, but from my understanding there is easements -- I had someone check out the easements between the two lots on Chateau and there is a five foot easement on the one side and an eight foot easement on the other. I don't know which one is which, but I think there is 13 foot between there, and from the gentleman who I do some checking, it was his understanding that that could be utilized. I had a company, Bruce Stewart, of the City of Meridian gave me several names for contractors, who I contacted, excavators that came out and met with me and they gave me the name of a company called Earth Energy, who they literally bore underneath and they can tell how deep it is, get the grade right and all that, and they can literally go like from my property, bore underneath the 100 feet and go right to -- like right to the middle of the street and, then, you know, the center of the street has to be dug up and tapped into. But the yards and the -- you know, they do not have to be disturbed, which I was thrilled about that, just for the -- you know, it would be so much easier on the homeowners. I did talk to both of the homeowners who live on -- you know, their properties are contiguous with mine and they both were very nice and both willing to work with me, if I _- even if 1 had to excavate, you know, from the ground down, they are willing to work with me, as long as I got it back in a, you know, manner. But the checking I have done is that -- it's my understanding is like I guess I feel like I'm more than wiling to pay for the hook ups, you know, I think they are a couple thousand dollars or something like that, but I guess I'm pleading for a hardship case that, you know, needs it to be brought to the -- you know, to my property line or -- so -- Wardle: Questions for Mr. Richard? Bird: I have none, Mr. President. Wardle: Okay. Mr. Watson, any follow up? Watson: Mr. President, Council Members, I'm not sure where this is leading, but there are side lot easements that exist for utilities. We have been burned a little bit in the past where we have tried to utilize those without contacting the neighbors and getting a fresh easement, so to speak. If the city was the one that was contracting this, I would require Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 14 of 58 new easements from these property owners, because those are dedicated with the plat by the developer. The homeowners rarely even know that they are there. I guess that's just one consideration Thank you. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Brad, is there any history with Bruce on how water was delivered and not sewer? It's got to go back to -- 40 years, maybe? Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Rountree. No. We had quite a long discussion about this, trying to revive his memory and -- Rountree: We do know, though, it is city water? Watson: Yes. The city was out on site and verified that there is a meter set there. Rountree: Mr. President, follow up? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Brad, do you have a recommendation? We have got to start somewhere. Watson: Councilmember Rountree, our new sewer ordinance says that the city is responsible for the structural integrity of the sewer until it reaches the property line. I guess I'm inclined to think that the city has some responsibility -- actually, in the right of way is how the ordinance reads. We are responsible for it in the right of way. So, 1 think there may be some responsibility for the city to at least get it out of the right of way. As far as the service running through and to the site, we historically haven't been in the business of paying for or constructing services through private property, but, again, we have never ran into this situation either. Rountree: Having heard that, then, the suggestion, at least at this point, is that Meridian be responsible for the stub out to -- through the right of way? Watson: Councilmember Rountree, if we are doing a brand new trunk through a subdivision that's going to be built very soon, we stub that sewer out to the property line from the main. Rountree; Okay. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 15 of 58 Donnell: Brad, did I understand correctly that the water -- city water was provided to this property 40 years ago? I heard the 40 years. Rountree: That was me just speculating. Bird: It wasn't built 40 years ago. Donnell: It wouldn't have been 40 years ago. Bird: No, it wouldn't. Rountree: It could have been 50. Donnell: How many years ago do you think it was when water was provided to that property? Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Donnell -- Donnell: You don't know. Watson: I have no idea. It's not part of a subdivision, so I can't even go by when a subdivision was built. Records more than ten years back -- Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: May I ask Mr. Richards if he knows how old that property -- at least the residence is? Richard: There is a stamp in the concrete that -- the sidewalk actually goes around the meter, the water meter, if I remember right, I'm going off memory, but I'm thinking it was stamped in '77. But I would not -- you know, I'm not positive about that. Donnell: Okay. Richard: It is an old house. Donnell: So, follow up, Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: So, what would it have cost in 1977 to have hooked up to city sewer? Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 16 of 58 Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Donnell, that's a good question. Chief Musser just informed me that he believes that that subdivision was built in the neighborhood of '77, so it's similar to when that house was built. Bird: The house is older I think than -- but the water was brought out in '77. Watson: I have no -- I have no guess on that. I'm sorry. Donnell: Oh, you don't have to apologize. I don't remember that far back either. Wardle: Council? Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Brad, I understand he has been paying -- he paid for four years on the sewer? Watson: That's what I'm told. Yes. Bird: Okay. And we evidently hooked up to water in about '77. That would be about the right time, because, as I recall, they took the subdivision off of North Cherry Lane there where Willowbrook and all them are and come out and kind of went through with Chateau and all them and that was about that time, probably. And we have reimbursed him for the four years that he paid for the sewer? Watson: Councilmember Bird, that's what Mr. Richard and Bruce Derr tell me. Bird: Well, I'm like Councilman Rountree. What's your recommendation? Brad, you're the one that -- you're the one that's going to have to set policy on something like this to a degree. Watson: Right. Bird: I'm not -- we are not afraid to make the decision, but it's your department and you're the one that's going to be hit up front to start with. Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Bird, I guess I would go back to what I was alluding to earlier. I don't want to be in the business of running sewer services across private property as a habit. I think to get it out to the proper -- out to the right of way is probably the city's responsibility. My only hesitation in all this, though, is what maybe I need to lean on Mr. Nary a little bit what the city's legal responsibility is when a property has been annexed and supposedly sewered for years and years, only to find out that it's not. I'm sorry. Rountree: Buy new ground. Meridian City Council April 5. 2005 Page 17 of 58 Nary: Thanks. I guess -- Mr. President, Members of the Council, I think, as with any other property, I think it is the city's -- I think as Mr. Watson has already stated, it is, generally, the city's responsibility to bring the service from the public street access to this property, so that they can -- they can access it when they want to. I think Mr. Watson's concern, as he expressed initially, is if you bring that line up the street 120 feet, it only will serve this property and no one else. But from the city's standpoint, I think there is a responsibility to be able to publicly serve that property within our city limits in some fashion, whether it's through the other yard, because it may be cheaper, if there is an easement there, it may be less expensive, but I think it is the city's responsibility to at least provide the access to the sewer for the property owner. They will have to connect it from the connecting point on the property line to their house and that's their responsibility to do that under our ordinance, but I think that's the hesitation 1 think 1 understood from Mr. Watson and he can correct me, but I think it's -- the only concern is that it's only going to serve one house and it will likely never serve anyone else, except that one house, but from a responsibility standpoint, I do think that it's the city's responsibility to at least get it to the line -- to the property line. Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: A side question, Brad. Would it be more cost effective to come from the park side to that site off of the facilities that we have in the park, as opposed to trying to do what we might have to do and run into what we might run into on Cherry Lane? Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Rountree, the one that's going through Tulley Park to serve the maintenance building is a service that can only serve a single building, plus it's way too shallow to get there. We tried. Rountree: No grade. Watson: We looked at that. Rountree: I figured you had. Wardle: Council? Rountree: Mr. President, I don't know if we need a motion or not, but I'm going to throw this out. It seems to me that we do have a responsibility to stub out the sewer to the right of way line on Cherry Lane and need to work with public works and the resident for the resident to connect with that stub out from their property to the right of way line and if you need that in the form of a motion I so move. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded. Was that Linder or Cherry Lane? Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 98 of 58 Rountree: It would be stubbed out off Cherry Lane. Wardle: Chateau. Bird: Chateau. Rountree: Oh, excuse me. Chateau. Yeah. Bird: Okay. Wardle: Brad, does that suffice for your -- Watson: Yeah. I think that direction will work. There will be a few details that we will, obviously, still have to work out, but -- Wardle: Okay. Watson: Thank you. Wardle: With that, Mr. Clerk, roll call vote. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8: FP 05-023 Request for Final Plat approval of 42 single-family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 12.24 acres in a R-8 zone for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 by Packard Estates Development, LLC — east of North Eagle Road and south of East Ustick Road: Wardle: Item No. 8, FP 05-023, final plat for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7. 1 will begin with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, President Wardle. This final plat is in the Redfeather Estates No. 2 preliminary plat. This is the very southwest corner of that project and the vast majority of the rest of this subdivision is up to the north and east. This phase is at the very west corner. The South Slough cuts across the corner here. The land that was annexed -- Eagle Road -- between Eagle Road and this site is immediately adjacent here. The final plat does substantially comply with the preliminary plat that the Council approved. The amenities in this particular phase are a basketball court and they are required to provide a ten foot wide public pathway along the South Slough that would ultimately be public and there is a condition in the final plat that they provide the public easement for that, so when it does connect that easement is available for the public and the city. I think the only small change that was made -- there was a pedestrian pathway access along this common lot here that shifted location a little bit. Other than that, this - Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 19 of 58 - all the lots -- lot count, build -able lots and common lots, are the same. We did receive written response from Engineering Solutions to the final plat report and they made just a couple of wording additions that they would like to see and staff has reviewed those and doesn't have any problem. So, if you would want to incorporate the applicant's response, staffs in approval -- or recommends approval of this final plat. Wardle: Thank you very much. Does the applicant have any additional comments? Okay. Council? Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve Item No. 8, FP 05-023, final plat for Redfeather Estates, subject to staff comments and the comments supplied by the applicant. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 8. Mr. Clerk, roll call vote. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: FP 05-022 Request for Final Plat approval for 70 building lots (single- family residential and office lots) and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres in R- 4 and L -O zones for Strada Bellissima Subdivision No. 1 by Dave Evans Construction Management — northwest corner of Victory Road and Meridian Road: Wardle: Thank you. Item No. 9 is FP 05-022, final plat for Strada Bellissima Subdivision No. 1. 1 will begin with the staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, Councilman Wardle, Members of the Council. This final plat is -- actually, incorporates the entire preliminary plat that was approved. This Strada Bellissima project is on the west side of Meridian Road, Highway 69. Victory Road runs along the south boundary. It was approved as a planned development. They did get a use exception for office buildings on the Meridian Road frontage. They are including those lots in this final plat, as well as the 70 _- well, I guess 70 building lots total. That includes the office lots. The common area in Block 6, 1 think, is the only one to point out. I will go to the final plat that was submitted. Way over here on the west side there was most likely for drainage purposes, I understand, was a common lot that was added. Other than that, the street widths and all of the other features of the plat are identical to the preliminary plat. My file does not show a written response from the applicant, but Dave McKinnon, who is representing them, I think did tell me that they are in support of this. So, thanks. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 20 of 58 Wardle: Thank you very much. Would the applicant like to comment? Mr. McKinnon. McKinnon: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Dave McKinnon, 735 South Crosstimber. I'm always happy to make a comment. We have read the staff report and we are happy with the staff report and ask if you have any questions of us at this time. Wardle: Mr. McKinnon, just a question. If I remember this application correctly, in the preliminary plat stage there was requirement from the motion from Mr. Bird to add and to achieve a certain percentage of open space. McKinnon: Yeah. Wardle: And I would assume with the addition of the -- McKinnon: That's correct. Wardle: Thank you. Any additional comments? Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve FP 05-022, Strada Bellissima Subdivision -- I butchered that -- No. 1 and to incorporate staff and applicant comments. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 9, FP 05-022. Mr. Clerk, roll call vote. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10: Public Hearing: Parks and Recreation New Fees: Wardle: Thank you very much. We will begin our public hearing portion of the meeting. Item No. 10, Public Hearing on parks and recreation new fees. Parks Director Strong, will you be -- Thomas: Mr. President, Members of the Council -- do I need to address -- say who I am? Catrina Thomas, recreation superintendent. We just -- I submitted a list of summer fees for our activities guide that will be going out later this month, so these are for new fees -- there are a couple of them that were increases from the Barn Sour race that we did last year. Otherwise, they are all new fees. The one that's the most -- the i Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 21 of 58 men's softball league. So, that one's -- we've actually had a good response on participants with that, so -- Wardle: Thank you very much. Are there any questions for staff? Bird: I have none. Rountree: None. Wardle: Would anyone else like to comment on Item No. 10? Hearing no further comments, I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on Item No. 10. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to dose the Public Hearing. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Wardle: Is there a motion to bring forth the parks and recreation new fees in resolution form? Donnell: So moved. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to bring forth new parks and recreation fees in resolution form. Mr. Clerk, roll call vote. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Berg: Mr. President, I assume that you would want that on the next available agenda, as soon as possible, in resolution form? Item 11: Public Hearing: Revisions to the Parks Capital Improvement Plan: Wardle: Please. Item No. 11 is a public -- I will open the Public Hearing for revisions to the parks Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Baird. Baird: All the seats over there are taken, so I will go ahead and address you from the podium. Wardle: Thank you. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 22 of 58 Baird: Before we actually start this hearing, I want to take a moment and go over the procedure tonight, which will, actually, affect Items 11, 12, 13 and 14 on your agenda. The goal tonight is to request approval of an increase in the park impact fees that were recommended by the impact fee committee back in September of 2004. It's my understanding that they came to you and reported on that, but it hasn't been brought back to you in ordinance form to make it legal. Now, before we can get to that ordinance, the state law requires that we update our Capital Improvements Plan, so that brings us to tonight's hearing on that. The actual plan itself is attached to the resolution that's on your agenda as Item No. 12. I'll presume, for purposes of its presentation, that all of you have had a chance to review that. We give an inventory of the completed parks, projects in process, as well as the plan for park expansion for fiscal year 2010. 2010. 1 do want to reiterate that your decision on approving this plan is not an approval of the budget item or any of the specifics in the plan. Mr. Strong intends to use the plan as a guide for particular projects that he will bring forward to you on an individual basis. Mr. Strong is here to answer questions if you have it on that, but with that in the way of introduction, I'll stand for questions and we will take public testimony, if there is any. Wardle: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Bird: I have none. Wardle: Thank you, Mr. Baird. Baird: Okay. We will see if there is anybody in the public here to testify. Wardle: Would anyone else like to testify on Item No. 11? Hearing none, I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 12: Resolution No. 05-467 Resolution Approving Update to Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan: Wardle: Item No. 11, 1 would entertain a motion to bring forward the revisions to the parks Capital Improvement Plan in resolution form at our next available hearing. Baird: Actually, Mr. President, I'm one step ahead of you. Item No. 12 is on the agenda, so that we can proceed tonight. Meridian City Council April 5. 2005 Page 23 of 58 Wardle: I will open the Public Hearing for Item No. 12, Bird: We need a resolution number, Shaun. And that's why 1 didn't get it, was because we had to pass this first. Wardle: Resolution -- I will open the Public Hearing for Resolution No. 05-467, Resolution approving update to Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan. Bird: I move we approve Resolution 05-0467 with suspension of rules. Donnell: Second. Bird: We don't have no rules on that. Donnell: No rules. But the second -- Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 12, Resolution 05-467. Mr. Clerk, roll call vote. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. _o Item 13: Public Hearing: Amendment to the Park _Impact Fee Methdolo and Increase to Park Impact Fee Schedule: Item 14: Ordinance No. 05-1138 Revisions to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Methodology and the Park and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule: Wardle: Item 13, I'll open the Public Hearing on amendment to the park impact fee methodology and increase to park impact fee schedule. Mr. Baird. Baird: Thank you, Mr. President and Members of the Council. The amendments to the methodology and impact fee are summarized on the first page of a memo that's in your packet, dated March 31st, 2005. In summary, the impact fee committee is recommending an increase for single-family dwellings from the current fee of 667.39 to a new fee of 763.16, a difference increase in $95.77. With regard to multi -family units, the current fee of $607.15. The new fee recommended for implementation is 694. An increase of $86.85 per multi -family residential unit. The methodology is adopting a standard of four acres per thousand in population. It reflects an acquisition and development cost of 95,000 dollars per acre, resulting in a per person fee or development of 380 dollars. Take those, multiply it by the occupancy factors, gives you a maximum. The committee went through some adjustments to bring the maximum fee down to what they consider to be the proportionate share, so that the develop bears the proportional share of the development of new parks. With that I'll stand for questions. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 24 of 58 Wardle: Mr. Baird, I believe that our new proposed impact fees have been circulated through the development and construction community. Have we received any official response from any of those agencies or groups? Baird: Thank you, Mr. President and Members of the Council. The actual meetings of the impact fee committee took place before I was on staff, but I have reviewed the minutes of those meetings, looked at the rosters, the attendance at those committees included representatives from the builders contract association, as well as the local realtor groups. It's my understanding that the increase was fully discussed with both the real estate and the development community and that they have been expecting this fee. In fact, some people are wondering why you haven't done it yet and should come as no surprise to anybody at this point. Wardle: Okay. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else that would like to testify on Item No. 13? With that I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we close the Public Hearing for Item 13. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bird: What's the ordinance number? Wardle: Ordinance No. 05-1138. And I will open the Public Hearing for Item No. -- Bird: We have got to read the ordinance by title only. Wardle: Okay. I would ask the clerk to read Ordinance No. 05-1138, revisions to the parks and recreation impact fees methodology and the parks and recreation impact fee schedule by title only. Berg: Thank you, Mr. President. That was about it. Ordinance No. 05-1138, an Ordinance amending Title 10, Chapter 7, of the Meridian City Code, providing for revision to the Parks and Recreation impact fees methodology and the Parks and Recreation impact fees schedule, 10-7-13 and to the impact fee summary, Section 10-7- 15, providing for a waiver of the reading of the rules and providing an effective date. Wardle: Thank you. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 25 of 58 Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we pass Ordinance No. 05-1138, with suspension of rules. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 05-1138, with suspension of rules. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll, please. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 15: Public Hearing: AZ 05-001 Request for an Annexation and Zoning of 156.49 e Subdivision by Brighton acres to - zones for Bainbridge Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: Item 16: Public Hearing: PP 05-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 429 building lots and 35 common lots on 155.44 acres in proposed R-8 and L- O zones for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: Item 17: Public Hearing: CUP 05-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development consisting of 428 residential building lots, one church lot and 35 common lots located in a "mixed-use neighborhood center" designation on the Comprehensive Plan for Bainbridge Subdivision by Brighton Properties, LLC — SWC of Chinden Boulevard and North Ten Mile Road: Wardle: I will now open Public Hearings 15, 16, and 17. And begin with -- for Bainbridge Subdivision and begin with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, Mr. President, Members of the Council. These three applications all pertain to the property that's generally located here on the south side of Chinden, Highway 20-26, east of Ten Mile Road, in between Ten Mile and Black Cat, north of the half mile. Lochsa Falls Subdivision is where they gain their annexation path -- oh, I'm sorry. Verona Subdivision. Lochsa Falls is also over here. Bridgetower Crossing's commercially zoned 15 or 16 acres is down here at the intersection. So, as you can see, this is the first request for annexation that the city has received within this square mile. The request for annexation and zoning is two different zones, an R-8 and L -O. The majority of the property is requested to be the R-8 zone, medium density residential. The L -O primarily pertains to what's called out as a future church site here on the north end. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for both medium Meridian City Council April 5, 2045 Page 26 of 58 density residential and as a neighborhood center. This property does touch the half - mile location between Black Cat and Ten Mile and, as you know, that's where we had designated these neighborhood centers at the hal- mile. In addition, Idaho Transportation Department has their policy that says only one access at the half mile, no other access points would be permitted in the future. Obviously, there is some issues that surround that, but the applicant is aware of that and we have received detailed comments that are in your packets from ITD. The Planning and Zoning Commission did review these three applications. They are recommending approval of all three to you. February 17th and March 3 are the two dates that the Planning and Zoning Commission met. Mr. Turnbull, David Turnbull, he's the applicant for these three applications, was the only public testimony that was received at those meetings. There was no oral testimony in opposition or commenting. There was a letter submitted to the public record by Landmark Engineering and Planning, Clint Boyle, for the property owner -- representing the property owner to the west. And you should have that in your packets. As you see from the aerial, there is all existing ag land out in this area, of course. There is an out parcel here on the southeast corner that is not a part of the application. There is a development agreement conditioned that is included in there that does ask for the applicant to provide the city with a legal description for that, so that in the future it could be annexed, but it is not a part of this application. A couple of the main issues that were discussed by the Commission mostly pertained to this next item, which is number 16, the preliminary plat. I'll let Mr. Turnbull kind of touch on the majority of this, but, as you can see, there is a major collector that connects Ten Mile with Chinden that is, essentially, the loop spine road throughout the project. This area that is north of this that is on the corner is approximately 70 acres and is -- was not a part -- there was some discussion very early on with the applicant about -- about this, about this area, because, originally, they did propose to include it in there. Staff felt that given the Comprehensive Plan designation of the neighborhood center at the corner and their desire to provide the commercial at the intersection, we recommended that they hold out this area and he agreed. So, this is not a part. The same goes for this area in terms of the plat, this small L-shaped area here, which I believe is about nine acres, is not a part of the preliminary plat, would have future conditional use permit on it, but is proposed to be annexed and zoned, as is this area for the -- what they are calling out as a future church site. So, the spine road kind of designates the boundary for the annexation and, then, everything that you see shown in terms of the platting is smaller lots is what they have included in that. So, just to be aware that there is a little bit of difference between the two applications in terms of what the legal descriptions say. They are providing a number of stub streets to the adjacent properties. Those got some discussion at the Commission, as did the landscape buffer on the north and the east sides of Broadbent Way, which is the loop road there. One item to point out came up about landscaping on the north side, if that's not going to be a part of the annexation, how would that happen. The Commission did amend the staff report to require landscaping on the north side of Broadbent Way, so -- so that there is street appeal, you know, and other reasons, as you come in here, the trees maturing at similar rates and things like that. So, we will need to address that in terms of the legal description, getting that into the city, but that was one point of discussion at the Commission. Another one has to do with sewer serviceability and, of course, if you have questions for Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 27 of 56 Mr. Watson on that, he can address those, but this is designated for the Black Cat -- future Black Cat lift station, which the Council has approved funding for the design of, but not the construction of at this point. So, this is dependent on that project coming through in the future and that today does not have sewer service. There is a future public park site designated here in the center of the project. Staff is very supportive of that. It is an element that is in the Comprehensive Plan for these neighborhood centers to have a public space that's reasonably accessible at these centers. As 1 was looking through the conditions tonight, I did not actually see where the -- how the transfer of that would take place and I would like to request that Mr. Turnbull address that. And if the Council could just think about how -- if you would like to have more detail in the development agreement about how that transfer will take place and I know Mr. Nary has also recently been working on the Autumn Fare Park and that whole transfer, so maybe we can add a point of discussion on that. That was not in the recommendation tonight, but that caught my eye when I was looking over the documents. In terms of the Conditional Use Permit, the landscaping is called out here a little better on this -- on this plan, The items that they are requesting exceptions from or dimensional standards from, the minimum lot size, they are, actually, not proposing any change, 6,500 square foot minimum lot size in the R-8. They are showing minimum lot size as 6,600 square feet in this project. However, on the street frontage they do have, I believe, about 20 lots that have below 65 foot of frontage and they are proposing that to go down to 48 feet for those lots. Those are non -cul-de-sac lots. So, that request is there as part of the Conditional Use Permit. Setbacks, I think the main comment that was made there was they are all standard setbacks, we just want to insure that the front setbacks are measured from -- that we get the full 20 feet on those. The amenities, as I mentioned before, the southern half acre open space loft there in the center is a future city park, potentially to be dedicated and, then, there is 1.3 acre private homeowner lot that's located here in the southwest. At this point in time they have not depicted any other amenities, such as tot lots and things like that. As you know -- I mean Brighton Corporation has a good reputation for doing those amenities, but Craig Hood, the planner on this, was wanting to get a little more detail from the Council tonight on that, if we could -- is it ten percent, because at this point they don't actually show ten percent of the total area as open space. That would be one amenity, but they don't have that, For this scope of project, 428 building lots, residential building lots, you know, there is some flexibility on these, but staff would like to have some discussion and more commitment on the record tonight as to what exactly the amenities for the planned development will be. There are five phases proposed and IT let Mr. Turnbull kind of address how he's envisioning that to happen. I think with that, those are kind of the highlights of what they are proposing tonight. Oh, I guess the one other point -- there is right now on this west side -- the school district -- let me go back to the vicinity map here. The Meridian Joint School District Two has expressed some interest in acquiring this parcel to the west for both a middle school and an elementary school site. We talked with Wendel Bigham today, actually, and he said they are continuing to try to negotiate this. It has not happened, so they can't actually state on the record today that for sure that's what it's going to be. So, it raises the question of access to that, what kind of access, micro - path, street, et cetera. We want to -- I think staff is of the opinion that even if it's not a school site, this -- what's currently shown as a micro -path becomes an actual street Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 28 of 58 stub. If it is a middle school and elementary school campus, Mr. Bigham told me today that it's -- while they are not used to it, having a public street between the two, if they had a public street dividing the two campuses, it could maybe be designed -- the street could maybe -- they could make it safe and it would provide -- especially given the fact that you don't have any other access to Chinden from -- in this square mile, we want to provide good access from the east going to this site, should it become a school facility or complex in the future. So, at this point let me see -- or hear what the -- yeah. On Exhibit E of your -- the Planning and Zoning recommendation, the first page of Exhibit E, this is the preliminary plat conditions. Item number two deals with that stub street and we can -- I can give you more detailed language after we have taken public comment, but we would like to have a chance to do that and that would say that once the stub is not necessary, as determined by staff and Ada County Highway District in the future, then, it would be provided -- right now it says a stub street to the 45 acre potential school site, plus to the west, shall be provided, if the property does not become a school site. And we wanted to have a little bit more direction on that and, basically, give staff and Ada County Highway District the ability to make that determination when that phase comes through, if that makes sense. So, I think with that I'll end staffs comments. Wardle: Thank you. And, Mr. Watson, I believe at this time, before we invite the applicant up, Mr. Hawkins -Clark addressed some sewer serviceability issues. Could you speak to those? Watson: Mr. President, Council Members, you may recall two, three, four months ago Mr. Turnbull came to a pre -Council meeting and addressed you as far as the North Black Cat service area. As a result of that meeting, I was directed to proceed with design of that system. We did a budget amendment probably six weeks ago and we either have or will shortly sign the contract with JUB Engineers to get that project going. Actually, I think we already have. I have eight different projects going, but I think it's going forward. But, he's correct, at this present time there is no funding for construction of that. I will put that together as an enhancement to bring before you in July of this year for your approval or non -approval. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Brad, before you give that up, does all that sewer into the Black Cat? Don't some of the -- isn't there a certain part of that west of Ten Mile that sewers back into Ten Mile? I thought there was a certain part of that that flowed naturally back to the east. Watson: Mr. President, Councilmember Bird, if there is any, it's very minimal. Bird: Okay. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 29 of 58 Watson: The trunk that goes up Ten Mile Road, turns and goes into Lochsa and it's relatively shallow up there. Maybe Mr. Turnbull can tell more. I did not review the preliminary plat. Staff did. There may be a small phase on that east end that can sewer into Ten Mile. Bird: Thank you, Brad. Wardle: Other questions for staff? Bird: I have none. Wardle: Would the applicant like to begin presentation? Turnbull: Mr. President, my name is David Turnbull. My address is 12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise and I want to begin by -- off the subject, but a comment that I was excited to hear about plans for a new City Council and I only had one request at the new City Council maybe we can have a wider podium here where I can spread my papers out. Donnell: Excuse me. I thought you were -- excuse me, Mr. President. I thought he was talking about a new City Council. Do you mean a new building? Turnbull: No. A new City Hall. Donnell: We don't need to get any wider. Turnbull: A new City Hall. And getting back to the Bainbridge topic -- and I appreciate Brad's presentation. And I want to just add that I think this is an example of what I spoke to in a previous article about the staffs work that they do before projects ever get to you, because, you know -- and I don't want to say this like I feel like I have been beat up, but we have worked quite a bit with staff going through a lot of the issues and sorting those things out and I think that's when you know you have a good staff when those issues are sorted out before they get to this -- this body. So, I don't think we really have any issues that are outstanding here, but I will touch on a couple of things that evolved through the process. Brad mentioned that in this area here there is a neighborhood center designation on the Comprehensive Plan. We felt like that it was probably appropriate to hold off on that area for any applications until after -- which I understand has been -- it's about to take place -- this area and the area north of Chinden Boulevard, are going to be reviewed for a possible Comp Plan amendment. So, we are happy to hold that area out of this application and wait until that area has been re -studied. The annexation Brad talked -- Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 30 of 58 Rountree: If I could have David -- point out that area again. Turnbull: Oh, just this area around the half mile section. Rountree: Okay. Thank you. Turnbull: Brad noted that the annexation area didn't include the landscaped area on the north and east side of this main entry road here. Actually, our landscape plan always included that, has always been in there, but the annexation line only went to the right of way line, so we submitted a new annexation legal description that goes to the back of the landscaping area. So, I think that issue has been resolved, Brad. Let's see. The park issue. This is proposed as a private park, but I have had some discussion with your parks director Doug Strong about making that a public park and we have gone through some of the agreements and we have, actually, hired Land Group to do a preliminary site plan. If this application is approved, then, we will continue to work with Doug to refine that plan and bring it forward for potentially a public park. But that is certainly the direction we are headed. Brad talked about the open space requirement. We, actually, do, with this plan, have ten percent open space requirement and I have that calculation if you need that. But in addition to that, any other amenities, if you look - - and I don't know if you can flip back to that park plan, Brad, but we show things, tot lots, tennis courts, and other things like that. Basically, I want to leave that open to discuss with your parks department as one of the conditions in the staff comments, so that we can discuss these amenities and where they might be located. In a future phase up here we would -- if this were to remain a private park, we would probably do a community center and pool there, but if it becomes a public park, we will probably move that across the street in a future application. And I do think that -- if you know our projects, I think you know that we -- we do a good job on those amenities. So, we would just ask to be able to work with your staff to finalize those -- those requirements. Brad talked about discussing a phasing plan. I don't know that that's of particular interest. Those things are something we delineate, but, of course, sometimes can change with market conditions or things like that. So, unless you have specific questions about that, I'll pass. And the condition about the stub street to the school site, Brad is correct, we did work that out at the Planning and Zoning Commission session. I guess the language that Brad is suggesting I'm not sure will change things very much, because if this, indeed, becomes a middle school, I'm quite sure that this area we are looking at right here is going to be their play fields and I don't think that your -- I don't see any way where they are going to bifurcate that parcel for an elementary school and a middle school and take a road right through those play fields, because those fields take up quite a considerable amount of real estate. So, we are willing to work with the adjacent property owner, with the school district, should they happen to acquire it, and the staff to work those details out. Right now we just left that -- it can go either way, whichever is best for that adjacent parcel. So, with that I don't have any other comments. I will stand for your questions. Rountree: Mr. President? Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 31 of 58 Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I have not seen a good graphic yet that explains to me the different zones. You're talking about an L -O and you're talking about an R-8. Turnbull: Everything is R-8, except for this portion right here, which is L -O. Rountree: And the annexation includes the portion that's shaded in green around that, then? Turnbull: Correct. And we originally had a preliminary plat for single-family residential lots there, but in lieu of the designation for a neighborhood center there, staff recommended -- asked us to take that section of the preliminary plat out, so that it could be flexible later in case -- you know, subject to whatever happens with your Comprehensive Plan. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: And I didn't see it in the brief look at the 49 pages of the staff comments, but in previous applications along Chinden we have indicated two things from the city standpoint -- or three things. One, landscaping. Two, sidewalks. And, three, if residential is adjacent to that corridor that noise mitigation be included. So, is that something you have anticipated in your development? Turnbull: Those are all in the staff comments. Rountree: Okay. Wardle: Thank you. Council, other questions for the applicant? Bird: 1 have none. Wardle: Is there anyone else that would wish to testify? Please, come to the microphone and state your name and address, please. Johnson: Lisa Johnson and it's 5745 North Ten Mile, Meridian, Idaho. And we are just that little triangle thing right there that you see on there and so Bainbridge Subdivision is going to go all around us and I know that we are just small potatoes in this big group that we are seeing right now and we also know that -- you know, we love to live in Meridian and so I can see -- and, you know, we know that the growth is inevitable, but we just have a couple of requests. And I haven't, actually, talked to Mr. Turnbull and asked, you know, what the details are, you know, with that coming in for sure, but we just have a vested interest in 20 years since we moved here in '86 and we have a two story house and we added an addition onto our house, so that we could have a view of f Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 32 of 58 the mountains that, you know, on the -- okay, what is it, the north side of us and so I guess what we were requesting was just these -- and this is on behalf of myself and my family and the Harold Johnson family next door. But we are just requesting berms along the side of our acreage on the south and the west sides of our cattle fence, mostly for noise and for privacy and also we are thinking it would be in the best interest of them as well and, I don't know, maybe they were planning on it, but just because we have cows out there and we just don't want the neighbors to be complaining about the cow noise and smell. You know what 1 mean? 1 don't want to have to be dealing with that, because, you know, when we moved here we were all alone and that's what we liked, so, anyway -- and on the berms, we are requesting a privacy fence on the south side of our fence line, maybe, so that, you know, we are not backed up against everybody's backyards, just because our house sits pretty close to that -- you know, the south side of the -- of the subdivision there. And also maybe possible buffer zones. And, let's see, also, if possible -- and I don't know how big the homes are, but, if possible, maybe to have just the one story homes right there along our fence line, so that we can still have a view, you know, rather than the two big story house, you know, so I don't know what's going on right there, but we are requesting one story homes right there if we could. And also I have been walking those paths for 20 years and that's my greatest pleasure in life. I was just wondering if they were going to add a walking path and if I could, you know, request that. So, that's it. Wardle: Thank you. Any questions, Council? Is there anyone else that would wish to testify on any of these applications? Seeing none, Mr. Turnbull, would you like to respond? Turnbull: Yes. I have actually talked to Mrs. Johnson's husband once before and received a letter about -- and I think they had a couple of suggestions. One was that they wanted this neighborhood park moved down next to their house, but I wasn't able to accommodate that. That didn't really make sense for the overall design of the community and being centrally located I think is more important. The other one was a request that we enlarge the lots around their home and we did do that, we originally had some smaller lots there, so we already did enlarge those. I believe the requirement, Brad, is that we would fence the perimeter of that subdivision and we would intend to do that, but as far as -- I think she is talking about maybe having a berm all the way around their property and I'm not sure that that's particularly feasible when you're going down side yard lot lines. We tried to make this as connective as possible in the event that the Johnsons ever decide to relocate or sell their property for future development and, then, you know, a road could be extended through there. You know, it's -- we don't want to bother them as long as they want to be there, you know, we certainly respect their right to be there, but we just thought that it was good planning and it has been, essentially, at our own instigation, but also has been checked out by ACHD and your own staff about providing that future connectivity. So, I guess those are my comments in response to her -- Mrs. Johnson's comments. Wardle: Mr. Rountree. f Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 33 of 58 Rountree: Mr_ President. With respect to the west side of that lot and the arrangements with the passing street, would that -- would there be an agricultural type fence there? Is there room to accommodate sidewalks in the neighborhood, how would that -- would there be a landscape buffer between the roadway and the west side of their property? Turnbull: There is a little triangular piece in there that we would landscape and, then, fence behind it. And -- oh, I forgot her comment about pathways. We will have detached sidewalks throughout this neighborhood, so she's -- those will be public sidewalks and she will be free to stole them at her leisure. And, hopefully, she can go up and use the park, too. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: Mr. Turnbull, I suppose there isn't, really, any way that you can guarantee one and two story homes. When you finish the development of this, I assume that you will be selling lots to individual builders? Turnbull: Yes. We do build some of our own, but we sell to other builders as well. I wasn't quite sure what her reference was to all of the lots or some of the lots or -- I mean if it's one or two of a critical view nature, I'm happy to work with her on that, but to put a blanket on all of them, I really would have a difficult time doing that. Wardle: Further questions? Rountree: Follow up on that comment from Mr. -- Turnbull: From Mr. Dave. Donnell: Call him John. Rountree: Call him John, instead of Mr. Turnbull. Donnell: That's what I called him. Rountree: I think the specific concern would be those lots to the north, which would be the three lots -- and I can't read the street names but in that area and maybe even a fourth adjacent to Ten Mile. Would you have objections to have restrictions on the plat for those to be single story? Turnbull: Are we talking about these right here? Bird: The one and, then, the three. Rountree: The one and, then, the three. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 34 of 58 Turnbull: This one here and, then, these three? Rountree: No. Turnbull: Or these three here? Rountree: No. Turnbull: These three here? Rountree: Yeah. East and west. Turnbull: I would say this: We would like to suggest that the restriction be -- and I do this -- if you will notice, a lot of places, like backing up to Ten Mile Road, I put a restriction on my own neighborhood that doesn't allow a full two story, because I just think it's ugly to see the full two story home on -- backing up to an arterial road. I don't think that's good for the community. But there are certain homes that -- where a second story is put within attic trusses, so, essentially, the roof line looks like a single story, but there is livable space up there and, you know, maybe to have a dormer window or something like that, but no full two story. So, I would be -- I would do that. Sure. Rountree: Thank you. Wardle: Any other questions? Donnell: Follow up, Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: Mr. Turnbull, I think that that's quite generous, actually, considering the fact that when we built in a subdivision and I wanted to maintain my view of Bogus Basin and I asked the builder if that could be accommodated. He said it certainly could if I'd buy the lot and, of course, that wasn't the case and they did, indeed, put a two-story home behind us. But, actually, that didn't obstruct the view, it was the trees that we planted and our neighbors planted behind us that eventually obstructed the view. So, perhaps your trees aren't that tall yet, but that can easily happen. So, I appreciate your accommodation. Turnbull: Well, I just had one of my competitors do a subdivision right behind my house and I did buy the lot behind me. Donnell: I couldn't do that. Wardle: Council, further questions? Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 35 of 58 Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have none. Donnell: Mr. President, 1'd like to move that we close the Public Hearing. Bird: On which ones? Donnell: All three, actually, if we can. Can we? Wardle: Before I entertain that motion -- thank you. Before I entertain that motion and before a second, I have a question of Mr. Watson and in my brief time on the Council I haven't seen this Council approve a subdivision without sewer service. I don't believe. Maybe you can correct me if I'm incorrect. Watson: Mr. President, there have been a few. Saguaro Canyon did not have access to the sewer at the time it was approved, although that project was funded at that time. That's the only difference between that and this, is that this project is not funded, but, as 1 said, I'll bring that to you in July for your consideration. Nary: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council -- and maybe Mr. Hawkins -Clark said it, but I don't recall. When we had our discussion this afternoon we considered maybe making it part of the development agreement -- it's ready in the findings and the recommendations, but make it part of the development agreement a statement that there is currently not sewer service and that the developer is taking that risk at their own expense of when that's going to occur when that's going to be funded. We did have similar language -- I think Mr. Watson indicated we had used language similar to that before we built the White Trunk in the north part of Meridian, just to make sure that all developers are on notice that there was not currently sewer service available. I don't recall if at the time we put that in whether those were funded either. I think we were -- it seems like we took forever to get easements through for that, so I don't think it was funded yet, but I don't recall. But that might be another assurance about that. The other comment l was going to make, Mr. Hawkins -Clark had mentioned that we had been looking at future parking acquisitions and standards that we would have in regards to that and I think the current findings simply indicate working with Mr. Strong. If the Council would like, it can certainly add a little bit of language that if there is going to be a public donation of park property, that they comply with all the requirements that we have in regards to the boundary requirements and clear title and those types of things and we can work up language like that and bring that back, if the Council would like to add that to the findings as well. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 36 of 58 Wardle: And, Mr. Nary, I believe we had Deputy City Attorney Baird bring a similar platting application for last week that had -- that we felt would ease the process for the city to be -- as well as the person donating the property as a planning requirement. Is that true? Or something similar? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, yeah, the only difference in that particular circumstance is that was sort of an after -the -fact as well. It was kind of another Band- Aid. This one is -- we are on the front end of that -- of a potential donation and a new annexation and that might be a good opportunity to at least work out those details and we can certainly leave the language very broad, as we normally do, which is simply working with the staff and trying to meet the needs and if we can't reach a resolution in what is necessary in regards to title and title reports and those things, that we can certainly bring that back in front of the Council for consideration at that juncture. But if you would like us to add some language, we can do that. Wardle: Thank you. If there no other comments, Mrs. Donnell, I would entertain your motion. Donnell: Mr. President, I would move that we close the public hearings on Items No. 15,16 and 17. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on Items 15, 16, and 17. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I love these motions. Shall we take these separately? Bird: You have to. Donnell: We have to. Thank you. So, I'd like to make a motion that we approve the request for annexation and zoning for Bainbridge Subdivision, taking into consideration all staff comments -- and I think at this point is this where we need also language in regard to the possibility of a public park or that comes later in the condition -- in the plat? is that right? Nary: That -- Councilmember Donnell that would be in the plat in regards to the park. If you wanted to include in the development agreement language regarding the fact that there is no current sewer access -- r' Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 37 of 58 Donnell: I was honestly going to get to that. Nary: Okay. Sorry. Donnell: And so going on with my motion, that it includes in the development agreement language that assures that the developer understands that at this point that there is no sewer that is offered and that they proceed with their plans at their own risk. What else do 1 need to add there, Mr. Nary? Nary: Mrs. Donnell, I think that's all we need. Donnell: Okay. Good. Thanks. Bird: Do you want applicant's remarks, too, don't you, incorporated -- Donnell: Not until we got to the -- I wasn't -- until we get to the plat. Bird: Okay. I will second that. Donnell: Did we do it? Wardle: We did it and I just have one point of clarification. Donnell: I knew it. Wardle: And that is for staff, we have some findings, do those need to be revised before the findings can be adopted, given the applicant's testimony on the replies -- I believe property description along the northern portion of the road. Hawkins -Clark: Right. Councilman, I think it would be helpful that we insure we have got the right legal description that Mr. Turnbull referenced. Since 1 misspoke, we probably need to hold off on adoption of the findings, since I'm not sure that those are the ones that are in here. Donnell: Okay. Bird: And her motion didn't state adopting it. Donnell: It did not. It did not. Wardle: So, we are entertaining a motion to approve AZ 05-001, Bainbridge Subdivision, with all staff and applicant comments and to, then, prepare findings and bring them forward for Council approval. Mr. Clerk, would you, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. i .. f Meridian City council April 5, 2005 Page 38 of 58 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rountree: You're on a roll. Wardle: Item 16. You're on a roll. Donnell: I was afraid -- I was going to say I'm going to let you guys do this one. Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I'd like to make a motion that we approve PP 05-002, request for preliminary plat approval for Bainbridge Subdivision, including taking into account all staff and applicant comments -- and is this where we need to add language in regard to an understanding in the development agreement in regard to the possibility of a public park and to bring forth findings -- whatever you say, Brad. Okay? Did we get there? Bird: You got her. Donnell: Okay. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 16, PP 05-002, Bainbridge Subdivision. Mr. Clerk, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I'd like to make a motion to approve CUP 05-002, request for a Conditional Use Permit for Bainbridge Subdivision, taking into account all staff and applicant comments, and etcetera and etcetera and etcetera. Rountree: What's that? Donnell: That's from the King and 1. Does that work? Do I have to say more than that or is it already on record? Bird: Mrs. Donnell, are you -- is this -- you took the applicant's comments, so his agreement to -- to go to the north there of the Johnson property and just have one -- his comments should be enough on that. Okay. I second it. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 39 of 58 Wardle: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 17, CUP 05-002, Bainbridge Subdivision. Mr. Clerk, would you, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 18: Public Hearing: CUP 04-056 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for two separate drive -up windows in a C -C zone for Jade Plaza by Sundance Investments, LLP — 3679 East Overland Road: Wardle: Thank you very much. I will open Item No. 18, Public Hearing CUP 04-056, Conditional Use Permit for Jade Plaza. And begin with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Okay. Thank you. Mr. President, Members of the Council, this application, Conditional Use Permit, is at the very northwest corner -- here is Eagle Road and Overland. Silverstone Corporate Center and, then, Silverstone Business Campus, the two Sundance -Silverstone developments that you're most familiar with. This property that's on this application is here where the two properties join, essentially, on the south side of Overland Road, the main entry, Topaz, I believe, is the name here. So, it's already been annexed and zoned commercially with a C -C and this is for a 1,600 square foot restaurant building with a drive-thru lane in a 13,500 square foot building. Here is the site plan that was submitted within the Conditional Use Permit. Again, Silverstone Way is a signalized intersection here on the west side and, then, the entry off of Overland Road is over here. So, they are proposing the building here. The entrance into the site is -- is going to be from the west here, as well as, ultimately, I think from the south you can see some connection here. The original certificate of zoning compliance was for two drive-thru windows. The amended site plan is drawn dated December 29th. The planned -- what am I trying to say? The Planning and Zoning Commission did approve -- did recommend approval of the site plan with the drive- thrus. This is one of those -- again, the main reason you're seeing it is because it does have a drive-thru facility involved with it. The landscaping that's on Overland Road is -- was the developer's responsibility, but other landscaping in the site, I believe, is all required by this developer. You have received the standard conditions that have been recommended to you. I don't think there is any other items to point out at this time. Staff did recommend approval, as well as the Planning and Zoning Commission, so I will end staffs comments there. Wardle: Thank you. Any questions of staff? Donnell: No. Rountree: I have none. Bird: I have none, Mr. President. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 40 of 58 Wardle: if the applicant would like to come forward. Larsen: Mr. President, Members of the Meridian City Council, my name is Cornell Larsen. Address 210 Murray in Garden City. I'm here tonight on behalf of the applicant and we are in agreement with the staff report and Planning and Zoning's recommendation to you and if you had questions I would be happy to answer them. If not, I will go sit down. Wardle: Questions of Mr. Larsen? Thank you very much. Larsen: Thank you. Wardle: Is there anyone else that would like to comment on this application? Hearing no further comment, I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on Item 18. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on item 18. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: 1 move that we approve Item No. 18, CUP 04-056, subject to staff comments. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 18, CUP 04-056. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 19: Public Hearing: CUP 05-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a credit union facility with a drive-thru in a C-C zone for Westmark Credit Union by Westmark Credit Union — SEC of Eagle & Overland Road in The Silverstone Corporate Center: t' t Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 41 of 58 Wardle: Open Item No. 19, Public Hearing CUP 05-003, Conditional Use Permit for Westmark Credit Union and open with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, President Wardle, Members of the Council. This application is also in Silverstone project. This is on Eagle Road, just south of the coffee location -- the coffee facility in that area is already built. This is the lot just south of their main entry sign there for Silverstone. Conditional Use Permit for a credit union. It has a drive-thru facility and that's the reason why you're seeing this. The structure has drive- thrus nearest Eagle Road. There is, the staff feels, pretty good circulation throughout the site. An elevation of the building is here. The fire department had a couple of comments about addressing and wanting the address visible from Eagle Road in terms of emergency fire. That's been added as a condition, so that they can easily see addressing when they are driving down Eagle Road. They had some concerns about when you get into these larger commercial complexes, being able to access those. So, I think the applicant's agreed to do that. There was several comments about the landscape plan that were included in the standard conditions of approval to modify requiring the proposed screen wall on the north side of the building being no taller than eight feet and a couple of other minor items there that I don't think I will go into. But the Planning and Zoning Commission had no public testimony on this, other than the applicants, and Cornell Larsen and Matt Schaffer provided testimony, as well as Tom Zabala, who is representing the applicant. The site plan is dated January 6th, 2005. And with that I will end staff comments. Wardle: Thank you, Brad. Any questions of staff? Would the applicant, please, come forward? State your name and address for the record, please. Zabala: Mr. President, Members of the Council, my name is Tom Zabala with ZGA Architects. My address is 565 West Myrtle Street in Boise. I'm here this evening representing Westmark Credit Union. With regard to the staff's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, we have read those and we are in agreement with them and be happy to answer any questions that the Council may have this evening. Rountree: I have none. Bird: I have none. Wardle. Thank you very much. Zabala: Thank you. Wardle: Is there anyone else that would like to provide public testimony on Application No. 19? Seeing no further testimony, 1 would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on Item 19. Rountree: So moved. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 42 of 58 Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item 19. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.. Rountree: Mr, President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve Item No. 19, CUP 05-003. Bird: Second. Rountree: Subject to staff comments. Bird: Oh. Second. Wardle: Would the maker of the motion clarify that that also includes the findings that are prepared? Rountree: Yes, sir. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 19, CUP 05-003, with the findings. Mr. Clerk, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donne[], yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 20: Public Hearing: PP 05-005 Request to amend the Preliminary Plat (PP 02-007) to add seven additional building lots for Heritage Commons by Brighton Investments, LLC — west of Locust Grove Road and north of Ustick Road: Wardle: Item No. 20. [ will open the Pubic Hearing PP 05-005, preliminary plat for Heritage Commons and open with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, President Wardle, Members of the Council. This application is to amend the preliminary plat for Heritage Commons. As you know, this subdivision is largely built out, but there is a small section here at the -- on the north end of the project that remains undeveloped and so they -- having had, my understanding, some success with their alley -loaded products, wanted to come in and amend their preliminary plat to add a few more of those. It does add seven lots to what Heritage Commons originally was approved for. The zoning is not proposed to change. No Meridian City Council April 5. 2005 Page 43 of 58 amendments to the Conditional Use Permit. The only item before you is the preliminary plat to amend that section. So, here what you're looking at is what the preliminary plat today is approved for and the street name is throwing me off, but -- East Layfield Drive. I thought that was Heritage. But maybe Mr. Turnbull can talk about that. But this area here, as you can, is, essentially, running a new alley north and south here and a new alley north and south here. The existing alley on the south end here that serves these lots that front on the common area, so this is just north of that. The preliminary plat -- this is a cleaner version that's shown here. There -- since it's under five acres and they have all of the open space already built in other sections of the subdivision, this particular phase actually doesn't include open space, but just so you know, they are still providing the same amount of open space that they originally had. The Planning and Zoning Commission did receive some comments from Rebecca Young on Heron's Lane. There was also a comment about some sewer odor that was clarified at the Planning and Zoning Commission that was due to a -- it sounded like a pumping station problem. But I think that got resolved. The Commission has forwarded staff as well their findings for this, they are included. The findings are for approval. The preliminary plat would, essentially, be amended in this section, if you approve this, and we recommend that you include in your motion comments from the Commission. Wardle: Thank you. Questions of staff? Bird: I have none. Wardle: if Mr. Turnbull would like to come forward and, please, state your name and address again for the record. Turnbull: David Turnbull, 12601 West Explorer Drive, Boise. Brad, could you put up the original preliminary plat again? I don't have too much to add, except to say Brad's correct, we had some success with the initial what we call Carriage Lane homes. I think that people out there -- it's not for everybody, but even the people that don't live in them love them, so we went back to the neighborhood and this area here had always kind of bothered me, because we had Carriage Lane homes and on this side and sandwiched in between some kind of traditional with the garages out front. So, as I thought about it and thought about it, I came -- you know, I decided that it would look better if we ran the alleys up here and added some more Carriage Lane homes. So, that's simply it. We went to the neighborhood, had a meeting, they all liked the idea, and I think we have everybody's support, so we'd appreciate your approval. I would stand for any questions if you have any. Wardle: Questions of Mr. Turnbull? Bird: I have none. Wardle: Thank you very much. Would anyone else like to provide public testimony on this item? Seeing no further public testimony, I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on Item No. 20. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 44 of 58 Bird: So moved. Donnell: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item 20. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve PP 05-005 and incorporate staff and applicant comments and I believe also the Findings as presented. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 20, PP 05-005 for Heritage Commons. Mr. Clerk would you, please, call roll. Roll -Cali: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 21: Public Hearing: CUP 05-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a mixed use three story building consisting of retail, office and residential uses in the O -T zone for Dave Buich by Dave Buich -- 641 North Main Street: Item 22: Public Hearing: VAR 05-003 Request for a Variance for a reduction in parking requirements for a proposed three-story mixed-use project for Dave Buich by Dave Buich — 641 North Main Street: Wardle: That brings us to Items No. -- I will open both public hearings on Item No. -- well, let me ask a point of clarification real quick from the attorney. Do we need to open both of these and take action on one before the other? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, yes, you should open Items 21 and 22 simultaneously. If the Council is in agreement to grant the variance, then, you should pass that prior to taking up the CUP. Wardle: Thank you very much. I will open Items No. 21 and 22 for Dave Buich and begin with staff comments. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 45 of 58 Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, President Wardle, Members of the Council. I will kind of address both of these items together in my comments here, but just briefly, the request is for a Conditional Use Permit. This is proposed to be a multiple story -- three story, to be exact, building, consisting of retail, office, and residential. The site is just behind us here, the shell station site. It is zoned Old Town. The zoning is not proposed to change. The building would front on Main Street and, again, Broadway on the north side. There is an existing alley on the south side. A city parking lot is immediately to the west and, then, of course, the two creamery parcels also. Here is an aerial shot that gives a little bit of a sense of what's happening, but you're all quite familiar with the area. So, here is the site plan that was submitted with their Conditional Use Permit application. They have, to my understanding, with Clare Bowman, Meridian Development Corporation, the MDC board has reviewed this, the historic preservation commission reviewed this, and the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this. So, you have three bodies that have all seen this prior to their coming to you tonight. All of them recommending approval. In terms of the streetscape, the trees are shown there, consistent with the patterns that have been built there on the north side with the bank. They are proposing to bring the building up to the street, providing parking in the rear. The elevations that were submitted are here. The front elevation on the top that would front Main Street. A side elevation fronting -- that would be viewed from Broadway. And, then, the back elevation there on the top and the side from the Zamzow's and alley and whatnot to the south there. It does sit on .41 acres. The Meridian downtown design guidelines, which continue to be worked on, are very close to coming to a Public Hearing, were reviewed as a part of this application in the design of it. So, you are aware, while that's not an adopted document, they were well aware that those guidelines have been worked on by the public and in workshops and incorporated many of those into their planning. Just go back to the site plan for a minute. In terms of Item No. 22 and the variance request, we have seen several of these variances proposing reduced parking in the Old Town area. We have received a letter, which should be in your packets, from Mr. David Kline, who has expressed some concern about -- about the parking and some monitoring and enforcement concerns about how parking would be handled and I just wanted to point that out, that that has been submitted to the record. The staff report you received on the variance application from Josh Wilson, it goes into detail some of the other applications and the findings we feel can be made that would support the reduced parking requirements. There is a number of factors that we think support not providing all the parking right now, you know, in terms of -- when you go downtown, a lot of times you think is it going to be congested or not and there is a certain expectation that you're going to walk a little bit further than you would, maybe, in other locations in a downtown setting. There was a parking study that the Planning and Zoning department contracted out several months ago that analyzed parking in the whole downtown corridor area, I think it was about a 16 to 18 block -- square block area and they found other than to actually -- there are a couple of days around where we are sitting here, the Nazarene church, as you know, on Wednesdays there there can be some parking problems, but other than that, that parking study generally found that there was a supply in the surplus for most of the core area, so I just point that out to you, that that study is available and was done fairly recently. I think that that's all the comments I will make at this point. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 46 of 58 Wardle: Thank you, Brad. And just for a point of clarification, the clerk would like me to clarify that the Planning and Zoning Commission, along with the Historical Preservation Committee and the MDC, did not see the variance application. Correct? Hawkins -Clark: Thank you. That is correct. Wardle: Okay. Thank you very much. Bird: Say that again loud enough so we can hear. Wardle: For clarification, the MDC board, the Historical Preservation Committee, and the Planning and Zoning Commission did not see or act upon the variance, which is Item No. 22. Thank you very much. If the applicant would, please, come forward. I'm sorry. Mr. Bird? Bird: Yeah. I have got a question of staff. When you have condos, townhouses, whatever he is going to call those things up on top -- I don't know how many there is -- some of those parking spots down below have to be dedicated and, also, if you're spending -- I mean if you're spending a hundred and a half, 200 thousand for a condo, you're going to want covered parking. So, actually, how many spaces is not going to be for the public in his own area? Hawkins -Clark: Councilman Bird, Members of the Council, there is four residential units proposed and, normally, we would see two parking spaces for those. So, that would be eight. If I understood your question correctly, it was how many public spaces would there be on this site? Bird: How many dedicated spaces? I mean you pay that, you're going to -- when you come home, you're going to expect a space to park. If not, Chief Musser's people are going to be down there refereeing fist fights every night or so. That's -- what do you require on something like that? Two per -- per condo or one per condo or what? Hawkins -Clark: Yeah. If it's two bedroom or more, it is two spaces per unit. Bird: And they have to be dedicated or, me, as the public, if I'm going to the retail or whatever he's got in there or to my office up on the second floor, 1 don't park there? Hawkins -Clark: Right. If I could defer that to the applicant to have them address, because I'm not sure what their -- what their thinking is on that. Bird: Well, thanks, Brad, you have answered my concern to a degree. Wardle: Other questions of staff? If the applicant would, please, come forward Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 47 of 58 Marshall: Good evening, President, Members of the City Council. I'm Scott Marshall, LKV Architects, appearing for Dave Buich, who wasn't able to be here tonight. Our firm's address is 9735 Federal Way in Boise. We have no issues with the Findings. In regards to the parking issue, there would be designated parking for the units on top of the -- top of the structure. They wouldn't be covered. There are four units. We would, of course, follow with what the city code would be to accommodate those places, if one of the units were to be two or over, there would be two spots. We haven't gotten that far in our design yet to really look at and see, you know, what -- if it's going to be one bedroom, two bedroom, three bedroom, it kind of depends on what the need would be. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I have a follow up on the question. You said designated parking spot. Don't you mean dedicated? Marshall: Exactly. You're correct. Bird: So, basically, between four to eight of those parking spots as shown there will be dedicated to the condominiums up on top, not for public parking. Marshall: Correct. Bird: Okay. Thank you. Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: Scott, what -- do you know what the applicant's plan is in terms of phasing in in this project? Are they going to start with the retail pari of it first and, then, leave the top part of it until they go forward with that part or do you know what the pian is? Marshall: I would anticipate that, basically, the construction schedule would be to build the building and have it be shell and core in the retail. I'm sure the applicant would prefer to have those spaces rented prior to completion of the building. That would be -- that would apply both for the retail, the office, and the residential. There has already been quite a bit of interest for the residential, so -- Donnell: Really? Marshall: Yeah. There has. So, I guess to answer your question, if the spaces can be rented and there can be commitment, it would -- Donnell: They would go ahead with it. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 48 of 58 Marshall: They will go ahead with it. Donnell: So, I'm going to go back to Councilman Bird's question. If I were to rent one of those, I would want covered parking. so, is that going to be provided and, of course, it would be dedicated, so to the staff does that leave enough parking places that are appropriate for the retail portion of that building? Hawkins -Clark: I'm sorry, I was talking to Chief Musser and I didn't catch the whole question. Something about retail appropriateness, right? Donnell: So, that's coming in the variance portion of it is in the parking? Okay. I think that President Wardle answered my question. Thank you. Hawkins -Clark: Okay. Marshall: If I may say, it's my understanding that the parking spaces would be required, but I don't think there is a requirement from the city to have them covered; is that correct? Hawkins -Clark: That is correct. Marshall: Okay. So, at this time I don't know if the covered requirement would be something that we would do or not. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Marshall -- and I know you guys don't have any idea, but right now in downtown there is so many rumors floating around we could build a motel and fill it, so I'll get a rumor. I understand there is a very strong chance of a restaurant or coffee shop being there on the bottom floor. Marshall: Okay. Bird: That's the rumor on the outside. I think that way -- I think what you put in there makes a lot of difference on the variance of parking. A restaurant is going to take a lot of parking. Office space can take a lot of parking. And I realize that we got a nice -- there is a nice public parking lot just down the hill, which I'm sure you guys would be glad to put in some nice stairs in back there, but it's not something that we can always have dedicated for your building during the day. So, I have -- I have a -- not a definite disagreement with the variance, but i think it's something that we really need to think about, because, you know, you can say, no, we are not going to have covered parking, but I'll guarantee you if I pay 150, 200 thousand for one of those units up there, somebody's going to put in covered parking. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 49 of 58 Marshall: Point taken. The applicant is also concerned with the limited parking and it's been looked at and addressed as well. We did consider the -- as stated by Brad, that -- the parking analysis and I think he's right in saying that it's not going to be like we can pull -- like in the strip mall, park right up front, take five steps and be in. So, I think that, you know, we feel, as well as Dave and Greg, that just the fact of it being on Main Street and having that look, people will go a little bit beyond as far as walking or, you know, to just be part of it. Bird: Thank you very much. Wardle: Thank you. We had one person sign up to testify in favor of this. Clare Bowman. If you would, please, state your name and address for the record. Bowman: My name is Clare Bowman, I live at 4400 West Legacy Lane, Meridian. I'm here in the roll as the administrator for the Meridian Development Corporation, the urban renewal agency for the City of Meridian. And because of a cold I'm having a hard time hearing myself talk, so I hope I don't yell at you too much. Mr. Chairman, Members of the Council, I have comments on a couple of the aspects of this proposal, particularly the request for the variance on parking. One of the defined goals of the market strategy that was adopted by the Meridian Development Corporation board is to foster development of a mixed use, pedestrian friendly, downtown area. This project in its conception is a major step in this direction and on behalf of the MDC board I would applaud the developer for bringing this project forward. MDC's market strategy report further notes that making mixed-use developments work in an urban area requires reduced on-site parking. I believe when the MDC board adopted that market strategy, that they had not seen a specific example of this and this may be one of the first ones coming forward to look at in that regard, but I believe it is consistent with what was envisioned by the market strategy. The parking study to which staff referred has indicated that there is available parking off street and on street in this area. The Farmers and Merchants State Bank building used up some of that as they took some spaces out of existence. This building will add not only the -- I think 18 spaces on the site, but there will be street side parking in front of the building parallel on Main Street. I have suggested to the developers that they consider angled parking on Broadway, much the same as what Farmers and Merchants State Bank has done, as a way to get some additional parking spaces nearby. I would also note that the draft zoning ordinances that the Planning and Zoning Commission are hearing right now for the Old Town area, would eliminate all parking requirements for downtown development and let that be determined by the market factors that the private sector is better at gauging than we in the public sector with our minimum parking requirements as they currently exist in the ordinance. Lastly, I would like to underscore the MDC board's desire for the streetscape on this project to mirror that of the Farmers and Merchants State Bank as it is currently constructed. The developer has indicated the willingness to do that and l met with them today to talk about some ways to insure that that gets done and we get all the specifications to them. So, with that I would stand for questions. Meridian City Council April 5. 2005 Page 50 of 58 Wardle: Questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have none. Wardle: Thank you very much. Bowman: Thank you. Wardle: Is there anyone else that would wish to testify on this application? Would the applicant like an opportunity to respond? Musser: President Wardle? If I could in reference to the staff comments, it stated that there wasn't anything from the police department. We, apparently, had an error and weren't present at the comments meeting. We do have a standard comment for multi- dwelling buildings in which we have mixed uses or a potential for visitor attendance added that we have a signed and designated parking as part of the police comment. That one wasn't included in staff comments, but I would like to have it on record at this time that it would be something that the police department would be looking at is designated or assigned parking for residential concerns associated with this development and we in the future will try to make sure that we have the comments in there in appropriate time. But we do have a condition on that. Wardle: Thank you, chief. Council? Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I would move that we close the public hearings for Items No. 22 and 23. Bird: Second. Rountree: 21 and 22. Donnell: Oh, is it -- 21 and 22. What time is it? Rountree. But who's counting. Donnell: Who's counting. Wardle: Thank you. It's been moved and seconded that we close the public hearings on Item No. 21 and 22. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 51 of 58 Wardle: Before -- I will entertain a motion on Item No. 22 and, then, have some discussion. Bird: Mr. President. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I will bring it up. I move that we approve -- let me get my glasses on so I can read. Variance 05-003, the request for a variance in reduction in parking requirements for the proposed three story mixed use project for Dave Buich, 649 North Main Street. Donnell: Second Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 22 and let's have some discussion. I'd like to open the discussion with just some immediate comments about some of the things and having a captive audience of some downtown business owners, as well as two MDC board members and the executive director. One of the important things for this community and for downtown redevelopment, in my opinion, is the amount of parking available to make that redevelopment happen and I feel, again, personally that one of the number one goals -- and I know this is a number one goal -- or one of the goals and I'd like to make it an important goal for the MDC, and that is to provide parking and if the goal of the urban renewal district is to increase density and, therefore, increase development, then, they should look to increase dense parking in terms of parking structures and parking facilities and so I think that that is one of the -- one of the greatest accomplishments that an urban renewal district can make and in itself the ability and the availability of additional parking will bring business development. So, those are my opening comments. Donnell: Well said. Bird: What's your closing? Wardle: I'll close with whatever else the Council would like to talk about. Bird: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: While I agree with you, there is absolutely no way, being on the MDC board, that they can afford to put up a parking structure, but we do need some more off-street parking. The only concern I had -- and this is something that we are going to have, because I think you're going to see residential uses on the tops of these buildings, because it's very popular, very nice place to live. You know, it's like Washington Square down there on Capital Boulevard and Idaho Street, you know, they -- when you purchase your condo up there, you get two spots in the parking garage, covered parking Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 52 of 58 garage. 1 just wanted to bring out that there was going to be a certain amount of this on-site parking was going to be dedicated, that wasn't going to be public parking, and we all realize that downtown we need some off-street parking. We are working to that end. We haven't got it. We have got one parking lot over there by the Masonic that the city leases. It don't seem to be used that much, but we started getting -- we start getting these kind of buildings in here with this kind of retail and stuff, they will start being used. So, we are working towards that end and we do know off-street parking is a very important matter. But right now at about 16, 17 thousand per parking space, we are not going to build too many parking structures. Wardle: Further discussion? Rountree: I have none. Wardle: If there is no further discussion, we have a motion on the table to approve Item No. 22, VAR 05-003, variance in reduction for parking requirements. Mr. Clerk, please call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Wardle: Now, I believe that we may move on Item No. 21. Bird. Mr. President. Wardle: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve CUP 05-005, request for a Conditional Use Permit for a mixed use three story building, consisting of retail, office, and residential uses in an OT zone by Dave Buich, 641 North Main and to incorporate all public and staff comments. Rountree: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 21, CUP 05-005. Mr. Clerk, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 23: Public Hearing: VAR 05-006 Request for a Variance for a time extension to record the Final Plat for Setter Cover for Setter Cove Subdivision by MKH Development, Inc. — north of East Ustick Road and North Locust Grove Road: Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 53 of 58 Wardle: Item No. 23. 1 will open the Public Hearing on VAR 05-006, variance for a time extension for final plat, Setter Cove Subdivision, and open with staff comments. Hawkins -Clark: Thank you, President Wardle, Members of the Council. You have seen several of these variances in the past. Current city code says that you have to record a final plat with the county recorder within one year of being signed. If that does not happen and they forget to request a time extension, which in this case is what happened, then, it leaves, technically, the project null and void. In the past the City Council has accepted these variance applications, instead of deeming the plat null and void and saying you have to start over, we have accepted variance applications to see if the Council is in support of allowing them to continue on from where they are at. They have had a pre -con meeting for Setter Cove Subdivision. The statement they have made on their application was they lost track of the one-year time frame while negotiating with the Meridian School District and their contractor on some of the details for the plat. Staffs report is the same as it usually is. We feel like, technically, the findings can't be met. There really is no hardship that was placed on them by Ada County Highway District, irrigation district, anybody else that prevented this from being processed in the time frame that everyone else has to comply with. That being said, the staff report does say that there have been other approvals like this in the past, but the staffs recommendation is that we can't make the findings, so -- thank you. Wardle: Thank you. Questions of staff? Donnell: Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: Brad, where exactly is this? Hawkins -Clark: I guess that would have been a good thing to point out. The Meridian -- now I just lost the name of the elementary school. Donnell: Meridian Elementary? Hawkins -Clark: No. This is over -- Discovery. Donnell: Oh, Discovery. Hawkins -Clark: This is just south of Discovery. Donnell: Got you. Wardle: Thank you. Further questions of staff? Bird: I have none. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 54 of 58 Wardle: If the applicant would come forward. Please state your name and address. Tealey: Mr. President, Members of the Council, my name is Pat Tealey, office address 2501 Bogus Basin Road in Boise, and representing the applicant. I guess we are at your mercy, there is no doubt about it. We missed the -- we missed the date. Not only did we miss the date, but I guess the city has, too. It's just -- it's a hectic time, we are doing a lot of development. Our approval expired on October 7th. We, actually, had a pre -construction meeting on the 22nd of October. We have constructed the sewer. We have excavated the roads. We have constructed the sewer. We are in the process of building the water, all of these, and we don't have an approval for the final plat anymore. The staff indicates as such that in the past you have approved these types of applications. While we don't consider this normal, we would certainly consider this to be the same as any of those other applications. We do note in the variance request that the staff report that they would recommend going back to preliminary plat approval. I don't think this would do anybody any good. I mean we satisfied the conditions of the preliminary plat, we have not satisfied the conditions of the final plat in regards to the time frame to record it. We ask your -- for your -- I guess your indulgence on that. A hardship that we did have and the thing that basically pre -occupied the owner on this were the negotiations with the school district. He was the original owner of all that land that the school district has got out there now, called Education Campus Subdivision, there is several buildings going in on it. There was land trades involved and there was some extensive negotiations as far as the irrigation system that went in there. We had - - down in the southeast corner of the subdivision there was a well here that was being used to irrigate the entirety of this land that's Education Campus and this Sutter Cove. This well was, then, moved up here and there is a big pump house built up in here. The applicant, again, had to negotiation with the school district on time and rotation schedules and the ability to use their pump station to irrigate the -- pressure irrigation for these lots. While that seems like a simple thing to do for this person that -- basically is a one-time developer, it proved to be a little bit tough, so -- and I'm here to answer any other questions that you might have. Rountree: Mr. President? Wardle: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Two questions. Is there any reason why you can't expeditiously get to final plat? Tealey: If -- it's under construction now. We have Central District Health's signature on the back of the plat. We would be presenting bonding to the highway district to get their signature and probably have it recorded within the next two or three months. We are not asking for one year from this date, but from the date of the actual expiration. We should have that accomplished within the next couple of months. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 55 of 58 Rountree: And not that you would have this answer, but you mentioned this has occurred with others. Has this applicant or you been personally involved in those other variance requests? Tealey: That's a good question. I think I was on one. Rountree: Just trying to establish a pattern here. Tealey: The connection isn't made. We get hired to do certain things and sometimes our recommendations go unheeded and we end up bearing the brunt of the -- of your comment like that. Rountree: I didn't mean it to be a brunt. I mean it's information. Tealey: Yes. It's not something that anybody wants to do on a regular basis, that's for su re. Rountree: Thank you. Wardle: Further questions of Mr. Tealey? Bird: I have none. Donnell., Mr. Tealey, that -- Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: Mr. Tealey, that small little subdivision is being done by the owner, the one -- is he the resident that's back in the back of that piece of property? Is that right? Tealey: That's correct. Donnell: And he was -- for just Council's information, because I was involved in a lot of the negotiations as we purchased that property, but he was extremely cooperative, so it surprises me, I guess, that there was some difficulty in getting all of the irrigation issues addressed. Tealey: I don't think the issue of whether we were going to get irrigation water or not was the problem, it was how it was going to be supplied to us. At one time it was going to be a separate well that we'd pump out of and, then, we, actually, ended up using the school district's pump station. Donnell. Right. Meridian City council April 5, 2005 Page 56 of 58 Tealey: And I think that's where the difficulty was. It's certainly not to mean -- it wasn't - - that kind of wasn't meant that the school district of was tough to deal with, it was just the negotiations took awhile. Donnell: Okay. Wardle: Would anyone else like to comment on Item 23? Bird: I have none. Rountree: 1 have none. Donnell: No. Wardle: Any further public testimony? Hearing no further testimony, I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on Item 23. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item 23. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Wardle: I'll entertain a motion on Item 23. Bird: Christine seems to be most familiar with this. Donnell: I do. I certainly will. Mr. President? Wardle: Mrs. Donnell. Donnell: I'd like to make a motion that we approve the request for a variance for the time extension to record the final plat for Setter Cover for Setter Cove Subdivision. Is that a typo? Setter Cover? I'm reading that -- okay. Sorry. Setter Cover for Setter Cove Subdivision by MKH Development, incorporating -- I guess no comments at all. Bird: What's -- is there a time -- before I second it, Christine, do you want to put a time extension on it? Six months, a year, or three months? Donnell My understanding from the applicant was that he said that they would only request a year from the time that their year was expired, which would be October, is that not correct? So, I would -- Meridian City Council April 5. 2005 Page 57 of 58 Bird: October 1 st. Donnell: October 1st. Bird: Okay. Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 23, VAR 05-006, Variance for Setter Cove Subdivision. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll? Berg: Thank you, Mr. President. By that motion I assume that we are preparing findings for that motion? Bird: Yes. Donnell: Definitely. Roll -call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 24: Water, Sewer, & Trash Delinquencies: Wardle: Item No. 24, water, sewer, and trash delinquencies. Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-2.1, delinquent water users shall have the right to request a pre -termination hearing prior to water service being disconnected. No water users have requested such pre -termination hearing for April 5th, 2005, water service for the attached turn-off list will be terminated on April 6th, 2005. The total amount of the turn-off list is $21,074.91. Is there anyone here that would wish to comment on that? Hearing none, I would entertain a motion to approve the turn-off list. Donnell: So moved. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item No. 24, turn-off list, in the amount $21,074.91. Mr. Clerk, please, call roll. Roll -Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Donnell, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Wardle: One item for discussion and that is we need to, in the next several weeks or so, set a date for our budget hearing. So, something to be thinking about. Please get your comments to the finance department. Meridian City Council April 5, 2005 Page 58 of 58 Rountree: Will, you have the schedule and the time lines for that to occur, so what's the window that we can be looking at? Berg: Mr. President. I'll e-mail you the window of where that lines up with what the finance department has kind of said. We just have to notify the county clerk's office when our public hearing is, so they can put those on the notices of the tax bills by the end of this month. Rountree: Move to adjourn. Bird: Second. Wardle: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn my first official meeting a chair. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Wardle: Thank you. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:45 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR T E WEERD DATE APPROVED,: ATTESTED BEAL WILLIAM G. BERG A., lif RK� kd �i�'- April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. REQUEST Communities in Motion Presentation AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL. DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS P (9 �v - p-/ RECEIVED APR -- 5 2 City dMeridian City Clerk Office w We Are Here Today to: • Provide you with information about CIM/BGG and why these projects are important • Present two preferred growth scenarios • Hear your opinions about the two preferred growth scenarios c CIWBGG Process 1. Develop a preferred growth scenario using public input (CIM/BGG) 2. Develop tools to guide selection of the preferred growth scenario (BGG) 3. Identify transportation needs to support the preferred growth scenario (CIM) 4. Develop Long -Range Transportation Plan (CIM) M'111 1111-1 y77w Importance of Planning • Guide growth so it benefits our region. • Agree to a preferred growth scenario to develop a meaningful 25 -year long-range transportation plan. • Develop a toolbox of regulations and other strategies to help Ada County and its cities achieve the preferred scenario. � �_ 7 t��enc��a Jnr ap - Lw ?I .. • rr T�, fji�F `t�S 5 } 'is € � k �➢ � �, r "id's E � �`' � r 4.1 -ell L"MA 'f s�� M ,f tpJ 1, � ZR Ali lrj• ,; .,,�',�'L yffi / w.Ef j!.! M 0,1 Ne ONE �— M c � f� Scenario Comparisons Mixed -Use Corridors Blended High proportion of Relatively high multi -family and other proportion of large lot types of attached residential development residences in areas of impact Highest redevelopment Additional growth in in existing urbanized existing small areas communities Implementation Implementing a preferred growth scenario will ask communities to: - Develop and enforce regulations, inter -agency agreements and other growth tools -- Fund capital 'improvements (e.g. transit, trails and other facilities) - Recognize market forces play a role guiding development R That's Next • April 2005 — COMPASS Board selects preferred growth scenario • May - July 2005 — Develop corresponding transportation scenarios • Aug., Nov. 2005 — Develop Communities in Motion transportation plan and distributed for public review • May - Dec. 2005 — Develop local plan and code revisions by Blueprint for Good Growth Closing Thank you for your time and interest in Communities in Motion and Blueprint for Good Growth Please help us by taking a minute to complete our comment sheet For more information. IR April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING Aprl1 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-D REQUEST Streetlight Agreement for Sutherland Farm No, 4 by Great Sky, Inc. AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS See attacher! �ve r -IL/ Date: Phone: Ernailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. r City of Meridian Public Works Dept. RECEP, Me ® -AR 2 8 2005 CAY Of Meridjari 4 Clerk cr--. To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council From: Karie Glenn CC: File Date: 3/24/2005 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 3129105 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the 3129105 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Streetlight Agreement for Sutherland Farms #4 by Great Sky Inc. Typical Streetlight Agreement. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Streetlight Agreement for Sutherland Farms #4 by Great Sky Inc and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. 0 Page 1 Feb. 8. 2005 5:06PM No.9822 P. 5 STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT This Street Light Agreement is made and entered into between the CT1Y OF NMMIAN and Great Sky Inc., pertaining to the street lights in SutberLa.nd Farm Phase 4, a residential development in Meridian, Idaho. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: I Great Sky Inc. has provided &treet light poles, concrete pole bases, fixtures, bulbs, and coMononts to the residential development known as Sutherland Farm phase 4 in Meridian, Idaho. The parties aclmowle W that the 6 street light poles and appurtenances were specially ordered items, not customarily used in residential developments its Meridian Idaho_ 2. Great Sky Inc., or it's assigns,, agree to replace, repair and provide any required maintenance of any of the above mentioned street lights, and/or appurtenances thereof that may hereafter be broken, damaged, or deteriorated, or require maintenances at its awn expense; and it is further Weed that Great Sky Inc, or its heirs, successors and assigns, shall keep the lights operational at all tees, it being understood by the City that bulbs, and/or ballast, do bum out and that the City will allow reasonable time to replace them 3. It is agreed that the City of Meridian authorize and pay for the electrical service to be supplied to the 6 street lights located in Sutherland Farm phase 4 in the usual and customary nmaer. 4. rt is agreed that the City of Meridian, because Idaho Power Company will not Main the bulbs and ballast or. provide any maintenance, will enter into a Schedule 40 Agreement with Idaho Power Company, and not a Schedule 41 Agreemena, which in proper canes provide that Idaho Power Company would provide maintenance, bulbs, and ballast. It is also agreed that lighting served under the Schedule 40 Agreement must be controlled by a photo electric device of the "fail off' type. 5. It is understood and agreed that Great Sky Inc. will assign its Frights and obligations hereunder to Sutherland Farm H.O.A- when said Homeowners Association is formed and. operational, STREET LIGHT AGREEMRNT Page 1 Feb. 8. 2006 6:06PM No.9822 P- 6 This AGREEMENT shall be binding on Great Sky Inc. its heirs, successors and assigns, and the CITY OF MERIDIAN. Dated this .. w day of _.... P 20 ATTEST: will-iam Gr. $erg, Jr., City Clerk ATTEST Secretary CUY OF MERIDTAN, a municipality and Political subdivision of thy: State of Idaho By Mayor beWeerd, Creat Sky Zinc. BY e4' President STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT" Page 2 Feb- 8. 2005 5',07PM No,9822 P. 7 I STATE OF IDAHO, } County of Ada, ) On this day of _ . 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Mayor DEWF.ERD, and W1LLLAM G BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of they CITY OF PIAN, Idaho, and who executed the within instrumew, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WE.)F, I have hereunto set my hand and afined my official seal. the day and year first above written., SEAL STATE OIC' ,) ss. County of , NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT MY CONK SSION EXPIRES On this 4 day ofW- 4:5� 5, before xrnn the and ed, a rotary6lic in and for said State, personally appearedd12.�-b and known to me to be the President and Secretary of mat Sky Inc., and who executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same_ IN WITNESS WIREREM, I have hereunto set my hand and armed any official seal the day and year first above written. SEAL s'�� ar� ®° +Ar n s Ald gone NOTARY PUBLIC FOR, IDAHO RESIDIIVG AT !1/S' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES / STREET LIGHT ACTREENMNT Page 3 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-E REQUEST Sewer Reimbursement Request by Dan Richards AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached Y" ry RECEIVED :if F I , l .1111 icy t`le k office To: Mayor De Weerd & City Council From: Brad Watson, P.E� CC: File, City Clerk, City Attorney Date: 3130105 Re: April 5, 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Public Works Department requests that the item below be considered on the April 5, 2005 City Council agenda, under Public Works Department Reports, for Council's consideration: Sewer Reimbursement Request — Dan Richards. Dan Richards, who owns property located at 2410 N. Linder Road, is requesting that the City of Meridian reimburse him a portion of the costs of providing sewer service to his property. This property is located in the southwest corner of Tully Park and is annexed to the City. The septic system serving the existing house is failing. No public sewer exists in Linder Road fronting the house. Surrounding properties are sewered by mains in Chateau Avenue. This property can be sewered by installing a service line between two houses along Chateau. Constructing a sewer main from the intersection of Linder/Chateau to this house would be quite costly for a single user. Mr. Richards has solicited several quotes, which indicate the work will cost in the neighborhood of $8000. To my knowledge, Mr. Richards has not requested a specific reimbursement amount. He has been contacted and invited to attend the Council meeting. Recommended Council Action: Discussion and direction. The pertinent section of the sewer ordinance follows.- 9-4-8: ollows:9-4-8: REQUIRED USE OF SEWERS: A. Connection To Public Sewer. The owner or occupant of any house, building or property used for residential, commercial, industrial, govemmental or recreational use, or other purpose, situated within the City which is abutting on or having a permanent right of access to any street, alley or right of way in which there is located a public sewer of the City is hereby required to cease using any other method of disposing of sewage, waste or polluted water, and at his expense to connect such building directly with the public sewerin accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, within sixty (60) days atter date of official notice from the City to do so; provided, however, that said sewer is within three hundred feet (300) of any property line of the ;building to be served or common property line in a multiple building development. Thank you, April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-F REQUEST Ustick and Linder Sewer Design Agreement with Engineering Northwest AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff initials: Materials presented at public meetings $hal€ become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached f f OEM (` i ';i'EAR e,7 ?U-5 MAgimohL midshaft To; William Berg, Jr. From: Lenard Grady CC: Brad Watson Date: 313112005 Re: Proposed Agenda items for April 5, 2005 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the April 5 City Council consent agenda: Ustick and Linder Sewer Design Agreement with Engineering Northwest: Attached is a contract with Engineering Northwest for design of sewer main prior to ACHD paving. The contract amount is$13,600. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approves the contract with Engineering Northwest for design of sewer main on Ustick and Linder for $13,600 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Crossing_Agreement with Erickson Inc. l Attchedt s a contr ct wth Erilckson Civil ford sin of a sewer crossin on Tem Mil. g g Mile Creek. The contract amount is for $11,724. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the Agreement with Erickson Civil Inc. for design of a sewer crossing on Ten Mile and Waltman Lane for $11,724.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Water Master Plan with CH2Mhill. Attached is an agreement with CH2Mhill for updating the Water Master Plan. The last update was in 200212003. The contract amount is not to exceed $78,346. CH2 completed the last update for approximately the same price. From the desk o£.. Lenard Grady Stag Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 H, Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208) 898-5506 Fax: (268) 898-9551 gmdyl@meridiancity.org Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the Agreement with e Page 1 CH2MHi[l For design of the Water Master Plan for $78,346.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. • Page 2 I. ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Project No. 05-011-00 -57- This Agreement for Professional Engineering Services (this "Agreement") is entered into this 2L day of March, 2005, between CITY OF MERIDIAN, whose address is 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200, Meridian, Idaho 83642 ("Client") and ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC, whose address is 423 N. Ancestor Place, Suite 180, Boise, Idaho 83704 ("Engineering NorthWest'). RECITALS A. Client desires to hire Engineering NorthWest to provide Services, as defined below, for the "Project," generally described as follows: Ustick Road Sewer and Water Design B. Engineering NorthWest desires to provide Services to Client as provided further herein. NOW, THEREFORE, Client and Engineering NorthWest in consideration of their mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein agree in respect to the performance of professional engineering Services by Engineering NorthWest and the payment for Services by Client, as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ENGINEERING NORTHWEST. Engineering NorthWest will perform professional engineering services as provided on Exhibit A, "Schedule of Services." 2. BASIS OF FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE. Client will pay Engineering NorthWest for Services and expenses as indicated on the "Fee Schedule," attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS. The Standard Terms and Conditions are attached hereto as Exhibit C, and are incorporated in this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 4. CLIENT INFORMATION. Client will furnish to Engineering NorthWest as a condition precedent to Engineering NorthWest's performance of this Agreement: NIA IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CLIENT: ENGINEERING NORTHWEST: CITY OF MERIDIAN ENGINEERING NORTHWEST, LLC 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 423 N. Ancestor Place, Suite 180 Meridian, ID 83642 Boise, ID 83704 By: Signature: Title: By: Eugene P. Smith, P.E. Signature: /:,? Title: Man a 9 Manager EXHIBIT A Scope of Services Design an 8 " sewer main extending from the existing manhole located in Ustick and Linder approximately 2000 feet east down Ustick Road. This fine will be located 7 feet south of the centerline of Ustick Road. Main lines or services will be stubbed to the north and south properties as specified by The City of Meridian. Design water main stubs or services to the north and south properties along Ustick Road as specified by The City of Meridian from Linder Road to the property just west of North 3rd Street approximately 4000 feet east of Linder Road. Coordinate with the utility companies and depict their services on the design plans based on plans provided to us. We will also shoot the utility locates if they will provide them prior to our field topography. Conversations with ACHD indicate that it will not be required to re -build Ustick Road. However, until the plans have been submitted to them for their review it is unknown what will be required. It may be beneficial to get some geotechnical analysis (core samples and "R" values) in order to have a better estimate for the thickness required for the patch -back. Geotechnical investigation is not included within our scope of service but we would coordinate their work for an additional $500.00. Erosion Control Plan: Is not included within this scope of services. Sanitary Sewer Staking Each manhole and clean out will be staked with 1 or 2 offsets. Each stake will show cut to the invert. One point and offset will be set 50 feet from each manhole or at a location requested by the contractor. All services will be staked on centerline and their end point will be marked with an offset and cut to invert of the end point shown. Benchmarks will be provided at intervals along the lines being constructed. One refresher visit has been included within this scope of work. Replacement of lost stakes or adjustments to grades in addition to the first and second set of stakes will be extra work and may require additional fees. Waterline staking: Each service or main line extension will be stake with a 1 or 2 offsets for horizontal location. One refresher visit has been included within this scope of work. Replacement of lost stakes or adjustments to location in addition to the first and second set of stakes will be extra work and may require additional fees. EXHIBIT B Fee Schedule For those services outlined in Exhibit A. Fee: Engineering NorthWest will provide those services as outlined for a Fixed Fee in the amount of: Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($13,600.00). Design: $10,875 Construction Staking: $2,725 The above amount does not include construction staking or reproduction costs. Reproduction: All requests by the client for plats, plans and construction drawings will be at the cost of $1.00 per sheet (24" x 36"). Photocopies will be $0.10 per page. Mylar copies, CADD files or other media will be at the cost of labor and materials. All such costs will be billed as a separate line item. *Note: Fees subject to change on an annual basis in the range of 3% - 5%. 2004 Hourly Billing Rates (Effective: May 1, 2004)* Senior Engineer $120.00 Design Engineer $72.50 - $90.00 Senior Land Surveyor $85.00 Cadd Designer $67.50 Survey Crew (2 -man) $105.00 Survey: Crew Chief $65.00 GPS Survey System $45.00 Quad Runner $15.00 Survey: 2nd Man $40.00 Administration $40.00 Runner $30.00 *Note: Fees subject to change on an annual basis in the range of 3% - 5%. EXHIBIT C Standard Terms and Conditi Engineering NorthWest, as an independent consultant, agrees to provide the services as set forth in Exhibit A to Client pursuant to these Standard Terms and Conditions, all of which constitute a part of the Agreement. ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Engineering NorthWest agrees to provide engineering services to Client in accordance with the "Schedule of Services," attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein. ARTICLE 2. FEE AND BILLING SCHEDULE: Client agrees to pay a Fee for Services as summarized on Exhibit B attached hereto, and incorporated herein. Unless otherwise indicated herein, billings will be based on actual accrued time and expenses. Client agrees to pay invoices upon receipt. Should payment not be received within 30 days of the invoice date, the amount due shall bear a service charge of 1.5 percent per month or 18 percent per annum and the costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees, if collected through an attorney. If 1.5 percent per month exceeds the maximum allowed by law, the charge will automatically be reduced to the maximum legally allowed. If Client has any objections to any invoice or part thereof submitted by Engineering NorthWest, Client shall so advise Engineering NorthWest in writing giving Client's reasons within 15 days of receipt of such invoice. Payment of the invoice shall constitute final approval of all aspects of the work performed to date as well as the necessity thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon termination by either party, Engineering NorthWest shall be entitled to payment for all services rendered on behalf of Client through the date of termination, plus any profit or damage available under Idaho law. Engineering NorthWest may cease work or terminate this Agreement in the event Client fails to pay fees as provided in this paragraph. ARTICLE 3. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY: The Scope of Services to be provided by Engineering NorthWest will be performed, findings obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices existing at the time of performance for the locality where the services were performed. Engineering NorthWest will re- perform any Service not meeting this standard without additional compensation. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. Engineering NorthWest has not been retained or compensated to provide construction review services related to any construction contractor's safety precautions or to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures required for the construction contractor to perform such contractor's work but not related to the final or completed Project; omitted services include but are not limited to design or review of shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retainment of excavations, temporary bracing, and other construction methods. Any opinion of the estimated construction costs prepared by Engineering NorthWest represent its judgment as an engineering professional and is supplied for the general guidance of Client. Since Engineering NorthWest has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineering NorthWest does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as compared to contractor bids or the actual cost to Client. ARTICLE 4. RIGHT OF ENTRY: Client guarantees full and free access for Engineering NorthWest, its agents, staff, and contractors or subcontractors, upon all property at the Project site for the purpose of performing all acts, studies, and research, pursuant to the Scope of Services. Client represents that Client possesses all necessary authority, clearances, permits, and licenses required for the performance of the Services herein and for the continuation of Client and Engineering NorthWest's activities at the Project site. ARTICLE 5. DOCUMENTS: Client will furnish or cause to be furnished to Engineering NorthWest such reports, data, studies, plans, specifications, documents and other information deemed necessary by Engineering NorthWest for the proper performance of Engineering NorthWest's Services pursuant to this Agreement. Engineering NorthWest may rely upon such information provided by Client in performing the Services under this Agreement; however, Client -provided documents will remain the property of Client. All documents, including but not limited to drawings, electronic data, specifications, reports, field notes, calculations and estimates prepared by or furnished by Engineering NorthWest as part of the Agreement shall remain Engineering NorthWest's and Client's exclusive property. Client agrees that such documents furnished to Client or Client's agents or designees, if not paid for, will be returned to Engineering NorthWest upon demand and will not be used by Client for any purpose whatsoever. Client further agrees that under no circumstances shall any such documents produced by Engineering NorthWest pursuant to this Agreement be used in connection with any location or for any project not expressly provided for in this Agreement without Engineering NorthWest's prior written consent. If Client uses all or any portion of Engineering NorthWest's work on another project without Engineering NorthWest's written consent, and/or adaptation by Engineering NorthWest for the specific purpose intended will be at Client's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineering NorthWest and Client shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Engineering NorthWest from all claims, damages, losses and expenses arising out of or resulting there from. No part of any document Engineering NorthWest delivers to Client shall be reproduced or distributed, whether for advertising or any other purpose, without Engineering NorthWest's written consent. ARTICLE 6. FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Unless otherwise specified by the Scope of Services, Engineering NorthWest's work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of any contractor, contractor's employees or agents hired by Client and not Engineering NorthWest. Such contractor shall be so advised by Client. The presence of Engineering NorthWest shall not excuse such contractor in any way for the acts of omission of such contractor. It is agreed that Engineering NorthWest does not have the right to stop the work of any contractor or other person at the Project site. ARTICLE 7. LIMIT OF LIABILITY: Client agrees that in no event shall Engineering NorthWest's liability for its negligence, errors or omissions relating to or arising out of the Project exceed Engineering NorthWesfs total fees for services rendered on the Project. This limit of liability shall apply to the aggregate of all Services rendered on the Project, whether to Client or Client's contractor(s) or subcontractor(s). Client shall require all contractors and/or subcontractors on the Project to execute written agreements that limit Engineering NorthWest's liability in accordance with conditions of this covenant. Client shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, save harmless and defend Engineering NorthWest from the payment of any sum or sums of money to any person whomsoever on account of claims or suits arising out of injuries to persons, including death, or damage to property caused by Client, Client's employees, agents or subcontractors or in any way attributable to the performance and prosecution of the work herein contracted for, including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing), all claims for service, labor performed, materials furnished, injuries to persons or damage to property, liens, garnishments, attachments, claims suits, costs attorneys' fees, costs of investigation and of defense. Engineering NorthWest shall not be liable for acts or omissions of any third party involved in the Services covered by the Agreement or for the failure of any contractor or subcontractor to construct any item in accordance with recommendations issued by Engineering NorthWest. Neither party shall hold the other responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents or other events beyond the control of the other or the other's employees or agents. Engineering Northwest shall not be responsible in any way for problems which arise relating to water in crawlspaces or mold/fungus problems which develop in structures constructed on the Property, and Client hereby indemnifies and holds Engineering Northwest harmless from any and all claims or damages resulting from such claims, including all costs and attorneys' fees incurred by Engineering Northwest arising from such claims, This indemnification shall be in addition to other remedies available to Engineering Northwest in these Standard Conditions. ARTICLE 8. PUBLIC LIABILITY: Engineering NorthWest maintains worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance for Engineering NorthWest employees as may be required by law as well as liability and auto liability insurance as required by law. A certificate of insurance can be supplied to Client evidencing the coverage currently held by Engineering NorthWest. Subject to Article 7, Engineering NorthWest will not be liable or responsible for any loss, damage, or liability beyond the amounts, limits, coverage, or conditions of such insurance specified above. In the event any third party brings suit or claim for damages against Engineering NorthWest or any of its agents during, or after Services are performed by Engineering NorthWest pursuant to this Agreement, which is alleged to have resulted in or caused damage, then: Client agrees at its cost to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Engineering NorthWest in any such suit or claim and pay on Engineering NorthWesfs behalf any judgment entered against Engineering NorthWest, including any interest thereon. Client will have the right to investigate, negotiate and settle, with Engineering NorthWest's concurrence, any such suit or claim, and Engineering NorthWest will cooperate in the defense of an such suit or claim. ARTICLE 9. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES: Client agrees to advise Engineering NorthWest upon execution of this Agreement of any hazardous substances or any condition existing in, on, or near the Project site where Engineering NorthWest's personnel will be present which may pose a potential danger to human health, the environment, or equipment. Client agrees to provide continuing information as it becomes available to Client of such hazardous conditions. By virtue of entering into this Agreement or of providing Services hereunder, Engineering NorthWest does not assume control of or responsibility for the Project site or the persons in charge of the Project site, nor undertake responsibility for reporting to any federal, state or local public agencies any conditions at the Project site that may present potential dangers to public health, safety or the environment. Client agrees to notify the appropriate federal, state or local public agencies as required by law, or otherwise to disclose, in a timely manner, any information that may be necessary to prevent any danger to health, safety, or the environment. In connection with hazardous waste, Client agrees to the maximum extent permitted by law to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Engineering NorthWest from and against all claims and liabilities resulting from: (a) Client's violation of any federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance relating to the disposal or handling of hazardous substances or constituents; (b) Client's undertaking of or arrangement for the handling, removal, treatment, storage, transportation or disposal of hazardous substances or constituents found or identified at the Project site; (c) Changed conditions or hazardous substances or constituents introduced at the Project site by Client or third persons before or after the completion of Engineering NorthWest's Services herein; (d) Allegations that Engineering NorthWest is a handler, generator, operator, treater, storer, transporter, or disposer under any federal, state or local environmental regulation or law. ARTICLE 40. LITIGATION ASSISTANCE. Unless otherwise specified by the Scope of Services, Engineering NorthWest's services do not include costs for required or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by Client. All such services required or requested of Engineering NorthWest, except for suits or claims between the parties to this Agreement, will be reimbursed as mutually agreed, and payment for such services shall be in accordance with this Agreement, unless and until there is a finding by a court that Engineering NorthWest's sole negligence caused Client damage. ARTICLE 9'I. FORCE MAJEURE: Engineering NorthWest is not responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the control of Engineering NorthWest (including, but not limited to, delays caused by other contractors, subcontractors or review and approval by applicable government agencies). ARTICLE 12. LEGAL ACTION: In the event of any dispute or controversy arising under this Agreement, the parities (including anyone who claims an interest in this Agreement) agree that they shall, in good faith, engage in mediation or other similar method of alternative dispute resolution processes to settle the controversy. If the result of such mediation is unsatisfactory to either of the parties, then any party may avail itself of any legal or equitable remedy available to it under Idaho law. In the event litigation is necessary to resolve any dispute arising under or in relation to this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. ARTICLE 13. SURVIVAL: All obligations arising priorto the termination of the Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating the responsibility or liability between Client and Engineering NorthWest shall survive the completion of the Services and the termination of this Agreement, ARTICLE 14. INTEGRATION: This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Client and Engineering NorthWest and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Client and Engineering NorthWest. This Agreement gives no rights or benefits to anyone other that Client and Engineering NorthWest and this Agreement has no third -party beneficiaries. Client shall not delegate, assign or transfer Client's duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of Engineering NorthWest. ARTICLE 15. CONTROLLING LAW: This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Idaho April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-G REQUEST Design of Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Creels Sewer Crossing Agreement with Erickson Civil, Inc. AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: _. Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS Seo attached mrr vll-� w int si%� �{ t, To: William Berg, Jr. From: Lenard Grady CC: Brad Watson Date., 3/31/2005 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for April 5, 2005 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the April 5 City Council consent agenda: Ustick and Linder Sewer Design A reement with Engineering Northwest: Attached is a contract with Engineering Northwest for design of sewer main prior to ACHD paving. The contract amount is$13,600. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approves the contract with Engineering Northwest for design of sewer main on Ustick and Linder for $13,600 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Inc.Attached Waltman Lane and Ten sea contract with Erickson Creek Sewer Crossing _ _ g Agreement with. Erickson Civil, Civil for design of a sewer crossing on Tem Mile Creek. The contract amount is for $11,724. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the Agreement with Erickson Civil Inc. for design of a sewer crossing on Ten Mile and Waltman Lane for $11,724.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Water Master Plan with CH2Mhill. Attached is an agreement with CH2Mhill for updating the Water Master Plan. The last update was in 2002/2003. The contract amount is not to exceed $78,346. CH2 completed the last update for approximately the same price. r Page 1 M Lenard Grady Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department 5taffHn&ccr Meridian Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the Agreement with 6601;. Water[ower,Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208)898-5500 Fax: (208)898-9551 gradyl@rneridiancity.org CH2MHill for design of the Water Master Plan for $78,346.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. • Page 2 WALTMAN LANE --• TENMILE CREEK SEWER CROSSING CIVIL ENGINEERING SCOPE OF SERVICES e� & CITY OF MERIDIAN CONSULTING EN GIN EERS !< LAND PLANNERS 3293 N.SCIii1IE1lT AVPSIfIE, I.(EWp]AN,7pAH0 &1642 •Ti0&8/68953 • !]08.6{6.8956 Project Description The City of Meridian (CoM) requested that Erickson Civil, Inc. (ECI) provide the following Scope of Services for design and construction of the Waltman Lane —Ten Mile Creek Sewer Crossing. The purpose of the project is to extend the City's sewer service from an existing manhole located just south of Waltman Lane and west of Ten Mile Creek, to a point on the east side of Ten Mile Creek within Waltman Lane. The crossing of Ten Mile Creek will align just to the south of the existing Ten Mile Creek Bridge to avoid disturbance to the bridge footings. Nampa Meridian Irrigation District will require that the City enter into a license agreement for the work within the Ten Mile Creek easement. Also, a Section 404 permit will be required through the US Army Corps of Engineers for the crossings due to project activity below the ordinary high water mark of Ten Mile Creek. The alignment of the sewer crossing will be through private property, and permanent and temporary easement will be required. The following tasks briefly summarize the Scope of Work for the Project. 1. Perform topographic survey work. 2. Prepare project plans and specifications. 3. Secure license agreement with NMID and 404 permit with USACOE. 4. Secure permanent and temporary easements for the project. 5. Provide Bidding assistance. 6. Provide construction assistance. The following detailed Scope of Services outlines anticipated Civil Engineering services and coordination efforts that will be provided by ECI as part of this project. g- - A. Notice to Proceed: It is our understanding that CoM wishes to move ahead as soon as possible with the project. The CoM will provide ECI a written Notice to Proceed for the work. ECI is available to begin work immediately for this project. B. Project Kick -Off Meeting: ECI will meet with CoM to kick off the project and further discuss specific project details. ECI will contact CoM to discuss and coordinate any other initial coordination items required to gain additional project understanding, the intent of CoM and any other initial "Project Setup" items as necessary to begin work. C. Progress Reports: ECI will issue monthly Progress Reports to CoM complete with an estimate of percent project completion, updated project milestones, and an invoice for work completed. City of Meridian —Waltman Lane' n Mile Creek Sewer Crossing t .. 3/17/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 2 of 7 D. Project Schedule: ECI will prepare a project schedule for the work. The schedule will be updated on a monthly basis. E. Coordination Meetings: ECI and COM will meet and/or have telephone conferences throughout the duration of the project based on the agenda items to be discussed. ECI will coordinate meetings with COM to discuss current project issues and to seek feedback to keep the project tracking forward. Meetings with the City will be held as outlined in the preliminary and final plat descriptions of work. Deliverables include: • Progress Report Packages • Schedule Updates • Coordination Meeting Action Items COM's Role: • Participate in conference calls and meetings • Provide necessary application, permit and review fees • Work with ECI to provide input in the form of review comments throughout project development The following preliminary design tasks are defined to gather project baseline information, and to develop concepts and options for the project that make the most sense prior to advancing the project to final design. A. Research Ten Mile Creek As-Built's -- CoM will provide ECI Ten Mile Creek As -Built Drawings for review of existing conditions including existing sewer easements and design details. B. Waltman Lane / Ten Mile Creek As -Built Review — ECI will request record drawings for the bridge construction to provide insight related to bridge abutment depths, footing sizes and other key features that are critical to the design of the project. C. Develop Preliminary Alignment — Based on review of the aforementioned as - built information, ECI will develop a concept alignment for the crossing considering ease of constructability and impacts to the surrounding area. D. Prepare Preliminary Plan — ECI will prepare a preliminary plan for the project that shows the proposed improvements, existing features, and proposed easements. E. City Review Meeting — ECI will schedule a meeting with the City to review the Preliminary Plan and discuss the design. ECI will make revisions to the Preliminary Plan based on City input. Once the Preliminary Plan is fully developed, ECI will proceed with Easement Acquisition and Final Design. F. NMID Coordination — ECI will meet onsite with NMID to introduce and discuss the project. ECI will modify the Preliminary Plan as required. City of Meridian —Waltman Lanen Mile Creek Sewer Crossing 3/17/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 3 of 7 G. USACOE 404 Permit — ECI will meet onsite with a representative from the USACOE to discuss the project and necessary provisions that will need to be made to bypass flows from Ten Mile Creek during construction. ECI will develop a preliminary dewatering plan for review by the City. Deliverables include: Preliminary Project Plan Ill. Surveying & Base .. �r A. Land Records Research -- ECI will research historic property land records data as itemized and referenced by instrument number in the abbreviated title report provided to ECI by the title company. B. Topographic and Boundary Field Survey — ECI will perform a topographic survey for the project area that will identify surface features including existing topography, structures, surface utilities, grades at specific match locations, signs, pipe inverts, manholes and catch basins, survey control points and benchmarks, curb and gutter, sidewalk, trees, and other miscellaneous surface features that can be surveyed without subsurface exploration. Potholing for existing subsurface features is not included within this Scope of Services. However, if the need arises, ECI will recommend specific locations at which further subsurface exploration may be required to build an acceptable level of confidence regarding subsurface conflicts with existing utilities. CoM will provide necessary potholing services, if required. C. Develop Base Mapping - Using as -built base mapping for the Ten Mile Creek Sewer Trunk & the Ten Mile Creek Bridge, and new topographic survey information, ECI will graphically depict the locations of natural features and the approximate locations of existing subsurface utilities on the project base map. D. Construction Staking- The contractor will provide construction staking for the project. ECI will include and item on the project bid schedule for this work. E. As -Built Survey — Due to the scale of the project and anticipated level of confidence of the design, as -built surveying is not anticipated. Rather, contractors will be required to keep accurate as -built record on their plans for submittal to ECI for drafting and submittal to the City of Meridian 7F7M'q '0 10 Easement acquisition is anticipated from one property owner for the project. ECI will work with the property owner to acquire the easements for mutual benefits, without monetary compensation to the landowner. ECI does not anticipate that professional negotiation or appraisal services will be required. A. Define Affected Property Owners — Based on the concept alignment, ECI will identify the affected property owners. It is anticipated that permanent and temporary construction easement will be required from one property owner. City of Meridian —Waltman Lane'' n Mile Creek Sewer Crossing 3/17/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 4 of 7 B. Title Reports — ECI will order title reports for the affected property owners (one property owner anticipated) on behalf of the City. ECI will review the title report to gain an understanding of any Schedule B impacts that could affect the project. ECI will later utilize the title report for easement legal descriptions. ECI will direct the title company to invoice the City directly for title report work. C. Property Owner Contacts -- ECI will contact the affected property owners to discuss the project and the need for permanent and temporary easements for the project. D. Draft Permanent and Temporary legal Descriptions — ECI will meet with the CoM to review project easement needs. ECI will prepare legal descriptions and exhibits for attachment to the City's easement agreements. E. Right of Way Contract and Easement Documents — CoM will provide ECI will a preferred right of way contract and easement acquisition documents. ECI will review the documents and provide project specific input to the City to tailor the documents to fit the project. F. Easement Acquisition — ECI will meet with the affected property owner, explain the project, and present the easement documents for signature. Due to the minimal impacts to the private property, it is anticipated that the easement acquisition will take three (3) contacts with the property owner. ECI will notify the City if after three contacts there appears to be challenges associated with acquiring the easements. A. Construction Plans & Specifications 1. Agency Coordination: ECI will coordinate the design of public improvements to comply with local regulatory agencies, including requirements of the City of Meridian, the ACHD, the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, USACOE, and DEQ. 2. Sewer Plans: ECI will develop detailed construction drawings, details and specifications for construction of the sewer. 3. Development of Details: ECI will develop details in accordance with the City of Meridian for specific civil design elements as required. 4. Proiect Specifications: ECI anticipates using the current addition of 1SPWC, the City of Meridian Standard Drawings and Specifications, ACHD Standards, and the Irrigation District Standard Specifications for the appropriate work items included in the development. 5. Prepare 100% Construction Drawings: ECI will finalize the construction drawings for submittal to the appropriate agencies for approval. City of Meridian — Waltman Lan( in Mile Creek Sewer Crossing 3/17/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 5 of 7 B. NMID License Agreement -- ECI will submit final plans to NMID for license agreement preparation. ECI will work NMID's attorney to secure the license agreement for the work. C. USACOE 404 Permit — ECI will submit a final 404 permit application to the USACOE for the work. NOTE: Permit acquisition may take 45 to 60 days from the date that the application is submitted. ggs: NOTE: ECI will provide the following services on an hourly rate basis as requested by COM. A. Preconstruction Meeting — ECI will arrange and attend a preconstruction meeting with the City of Meridian, ACRD, Irrigation District, and the contractors performing the work. The City will chair the meeting and will review the project schedule and inspection needs. B. Periodic Site Visits: ECI will visit the site and review progress as requested. ECI will check general conformance between the design and the construction activities. ECI anticipates that twice weekly site visits will be required throughout construction C. Change Orders: ECI will provide technical input regarding change order issues. Questions will be addressed, options will be investigated, and recommendations will be made. D. Contractor Submittal Reviews: ECI will review shop drawings for project components and materials that are specified within the specifications. Submittals that will require review should be provided to ECI. Upon completion of ECI review, all submittals will be returned them to COM for distribution and processing. E. Punch List Preparation: ECI personnel will visit the site and compare work completed to the contract plans and specifications. A punch list of outstanding items will be generated and provided to COM for appropriate follow-up. Re- inspection will be performed as requested. F. Bidding Assistance: ECI will attend prebid and/or preconstruction meetings as requested. In addition, ECI will be available, as requested, to field questions of bidders that arise during the bidding process. G. Opinion of Probable Cost: ECI will perform material take -offs and provide an opinion of probable cost for the project as requested. H. Record Drawings: ECI will provide Record Drawings to the City of Meridian and DEQ. Information will be obtained from the contractor and their "redlined, as- City of Meridian —Waltman Lar, ren Mile Creek Sewer Crossing f 3117/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 6 of 7 built" construction plans. This information will be incorporated into design pians. No surveying is anticipated for this work. MI VII. Work Not Included �' N A. Application and review fees. (To be paid by COM) B. Title Report Fees C. Bulk Printing. (ECI will track this item as a reimbursable expense) D. Utility Boring. (Not anticipated) E. Permit Fees. (By COM) F. Attorney Retainer Fees for License Agreements. (By COM) G. Geotechnical investigation and testing services (To be provided to ECI by COM). H. Full Time Construction Inspection_ L Environmental evaluations. (Not Anticipated) J. Developing, assembling, and reproducing contract and bidding documents. K. Hydraulic capacity evaluations of existing water and sanitary sewer systems. (Capacity information will be provided by City of Meridian) VIII. Fee Estrmate"F3 NO� w Civil Engineering Design Tasks Fee Estimate I. Project Management $ 1,264 II. Preliminary Design $ 1,307 Ill. Surveying & Basemapping $ 1,078 IV. Easement Acquisition $ 2,075 V. Final Design $ 3,592 VI. Construction Services $ 2,408 Lump Sum Design Fee $ 11,724 (See Attached Man -Hour Estimate, Exhibit -A) City of Meridian —Waltman Lai Ten Mile Creek Sewer Crossing 3/17/2005 Project No. 105003 Page 7 of 7 If this proposal is acceptable, please secure the appropriate signature below and return one original copy to Erickson-Civil, Inc. ECI's receipt of the signed proposal by ECl will serve as the Notice to Proceed for the work. We would appreciate the opportunity to further discuss this proposal with you if you should have any questions. I will be the single point of contact for questions and coordination efforts related to the project. Accepted By: Sincerely, CITY OF MERIDIAN ERICKSON-CIVIL, INC. Y By: Rosi fKkson, P.E. Project Manager Title: Date: RE cc: File Project Milestones (Based on a March 28, 2005 Notice to Proceed) I. Project Management March 28 — June 6, 2005 II. Preliminary Design March 28 — April 18, 2005 III. Surveying & Basemapping March 28 — April 18, 2005 IV. Easement Acquisition April 18 — May 16, 2005 V. Final Design April 18 — June 6, 2005 VI. Construction Services June 6 — July 20, 2005 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-H REQUEST Water Master Pian Agreement with CH2MhiII AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL. DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached Task Order Domestic Water System Master Plan Update City of Meridian Exhibit A This Task Order is made this 281h day of March, 2005 by and between City of Meridian, (City) and CH2M HILL, INC. pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth under a Miscellaneous Engineering Services Agreement executed between the parties on July 16th, 1993. CH2M HILL (Consultant) shall provide the following services, as described herein, related to the update of the City's existing Domestic Water System Master Plan (Plan), dated May 2002. The document shall be prepared using the existing plan as a basis. The budget for these services is presented in Exhibit B on a per -task basis. These per -task budgets were developed to establish the level of effort for each task as well as to establish the overall project budget. Task 1. Executive Summary An executive summary will be developed for the Plan update that will serve as a stand- alone document for distribution to the public. An overview map of the system providing a general description of the system will also be provided as part of the executive summary. That map will describe the capital improvements associated with projected growth, without specific locations or detail provided on those improvements. All other chapters within the Plan will be used for internal purposes only, due to the sensitive nature of the material included. Assy tnp tions: One draft and one final revision will be prepared for the executive summary and associated overview map. The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. Deliverables: A stand-alone executive summary section along with an overview map of the existing and future system will be developed and delivered to the City. The Executive Summary will be delivered in electronic format as part of the PDF and may be reproduced by the City for public distribution as needed. Task 2. Collection of Information and Update of the Description of Water System City staff will provide information and data to Consultant. Much of the needed information can be collected and provided prior to execution of specific tasks. Other information, input, and decision-making will be provided by City staff throughout the course of Plan development and is not specifically identified as part of this subtask. The information listed below will be provided by the City to Consultant in hardcopy format, and electronic format where available, as stated below: • Current City Comprehensive Plan • Water demand, as recorded from all applicable master meter locations since 2002, in electronic format • Consumption information (billing records) since 2002 in electronic format categorized by user classification • Maximum Daily and Peak Hour Demand for 2002-2004 • Historical population (since 2000) • Population projections from the City and County or other City -recognized analysis for the City and extended growth area (if available) • Other projections available from collection system studies • Current Land use or zoning map for City and extended growth area • Water quality data since 2002 and all documentation of the City's water quality monitoring program (coliform monitoring plan, organics monitoring plan, inorganics monitoring plan, etc.) • Valve settings (manual and automatic) and new pump curves since 2002 or revised • Copies of all City water rights, including those which have been recently revised as well as proposed revisions • Current EPANet hydraulic model • Available Geographic Information System (GIS) water utility, parcel, and topographic databases (latest updated versions) Consultant's services with respect to this task shall include review of information provided and follow-up coordination with City staff to ensure all needed information is provided. Consultant will update the System Description. The specific subsections assumed to comprise the Description of Water System section will include: • System Background Supply • Treatment • Service Zones • Pump Stations • Booster Stations • Storage • Pump Control System • Distribution System • Related Plans + Hydraulic Profile In general, information provided in the existing Plan shall be used as the basis for the "Description of Water System" section. Consultant proposes to add three additional 2 sections identified below. Where updated information is necessary, it shall be provided by the City in electronic format for inclusion and formatting by Consultant into the Plan. System Background Consultant will update the discussion regarding the history of the water system as well as general current and projected growth trends. Consultant shall prepare a map for the existing system. The City shall update the map to reflect current water system and purveyor ownerships. Related Plans Consultant shall update the list of related plans and planning efforts that have relevance to the Plan. Updated information on related planning efforts will be prepared by the City and submitted for Consultant use. Hydraulic Profile An updated hydraulic profile will be developed showing the sources, booster stations, storage and valves that control the flow in the system. The project kick-off meeting will be included in this task. The City will deliver listed information to Consultant at this meeting. Assumptions: The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. The kick-off meeting will be conducted as part of this task. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. Deliverables: An updated System. Description will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Task 3. Water Requirements The purpose of this section of the Plan is to estimate future water demands so that facility improvements can be effectively planned. City will provide the population projections. The Consultant will update the existing chapter and will recommend future water use per capita values. Current Population, Service Connections, Water Use, and Equivalent Residential Units Current City population will be presented in the Plan along with the current number of service connections and current water usage. The information will be categorized for the City where available. Data presented in Chapter 4 of the existing Plan will be incorporated into the tabular data presented in the updated Plan. Data will be presented primarily in tabular and graphical form in essentially the same set of tables presented in Chapter 4 of the existing Plan. The purpose of this activity is to establish current water demand, recent historical demand trends, and per -capita demand and consumption trends. Per -capita and unaccounted water will be computed similar to that presented in the existing Plan. Projected Land Use, Future Population, Extended Impact Areas and Water Demand Projected growth in water demand will be based on extrapolating recent population growth trends, historical water usage and growth in service connections and other information such as the ongoing collection system study. The City will identify and describe any projected changes in land use that might affect growth in population and water demand. Consultant will include this information on projected land use trends, if any, in the Plan; however, projected water demand will be based on an escalation of current demand (based on an average of the most -recent last 3-5 year period) by the rate of population growth as provided by the City. Projected population and water demand will be estimated for 5 and 20 -year planning horizons desired by the City. The extended impact areas will also be evaluated for water requirements and the timing of that growth. A meeting will be conducted as part of this task to ensure that City staff are in agreement on the projected growth rate prior to using those numbers for storage, pumping, source or distribution analysis. Assumptions: The City will provide year by year population projections through the 20 year planning horizon. Consultant will calculate per capita water use. All information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. Deliverables: An updated Water Requirements section will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Task 4. Water Supply and Storage An initial meeting with Ed Squires/Hydro Logics, Inc. will be conducted to ensure that the City can continue to develop sources of supply that are consistent with the grid expansion that is currently being conducted. This discussion will center on the projected availability and quality of water in undeveloped areas of the system. This task will combine the Water Supply and Storage Chapters in the existing Plan into a single chapter. Areas of focus include: • Existing Source including Water Rights • Current Water Supply Requirements • Future Water Supply Requirements • Extended Impact Water Supply Requirements Consultant shall prepare tabular descriptions of the City's water rights. Consultant shall prepare an assessment of the need for additional water rights based projected water use. The City shall provide clean, reproducible copies of its water rights to Consultant for assistance with this subtask. The City will continue to develop well sources to meet peak hour demands. One ground storage reservoir with associated pump station will be assumed in each service area. City will identify approximate locations and size for the storage. No additional work on conservation will be included. The discussion from the existing plan will be used in the update. Assumptions: The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. Consultant will assume that well locations will continue to be developed as needed by the City. Each service area will be able to supply peak hour demand and no transfer of water between zones will be calculated. Consultant will not be responsible for identifying specific locations for future supply or storage. No alternative calculations for storage will be presented. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. This scope and budget assumes that the current development of well sources on an as needed basis at regular intervals will continue. The evaluation of a more centralized approach to water supply is required from either ground or surface water sources is not included as part of this scope and budget. Deliverables: An updated Water Supply and Storage section will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Task 5, Distribution/Hydraulic Analysis The distribution and hydraulic analysis will constitute the largest change from the existing Plan. The existing model is being actively used by City staff to evaluate the system. This EPANet based model will be converted to an industry standard third party interface for use during the Plan. At the completion of the Plan, the model will be delivered back to the City in EPANet V2.0 for both the existing and proposed future systems. Consultant will spend up to S hours working with the City at the beginning of the project to gain an understanding of how the model was developed and how it is currently being used. The criteria used in the existing plan for required pressures, velocities and fire flows within the system will be used to identify deficiencies and the associated improvements in the Plan. The modeling effort will be broken into the following steps: • Import EPANet into 3,d Party Software • Develop a Calibration Plan and Collect Data • Load Existing and Future Demands • Perform Model Calibration • Perform the Existing and Future (5 and 20 year) Domestic and Fire Flow Analysis • Perform a Redundancy Analysis + Meet with the City, Deliver the Model and Document the Analysis import EPANet into 3111 Party Software As discussed above the existing EPANet model will be loaded into third party software that uses EPANet as the hydraulic engine. This task will also include meeting with the City to gain an understanding of model development and use. Within the third party software, scenarios for existing and future simulations will be set up. Any recent updates to the system that are not currently reflected in the model will be made. Additional information on system facilities shall be provided by the City and incorporated into the model by the Consultant as needed. This information includes but is not limited to: pump curves, valve settings, reservoir dimensions, and reservoir elevations. Develop a Calibration Plan and Collect Data One of the first steps will be to develop a calibration plan for the collection of pressures and flows within the system. The City currently has information from many flow tests that may be used in this effort. The number and location of pressure and flow measurements will be identified through correspondence with City staff concerning pressure zone delineation, problem areas, and future growth. City staff will collect system pressures and flows in addition to monitoring boundary conditions. Collection of boundary condition information during the pressure and flow tests is critical to accurate calibration. Boundary conditions consist of source flow meters as well as reservoir levels. City staff shall collect the pressure, flow, and boundary condition information and furnish it to Consultant in a readily usable spreadsheet format. This field calibration effort is expected to take approximately two weeks. System measurements shall include collecting 20 to 30 pressure and flow readings at hydrants throughout the system using City equipment. The field data shall be coordinated with City operations staff to confirm the run status of pumps during data-collection efforts. Consultant shall be present on site during the first 1.5 days of this activity. Load Existing and Future Demands Consultant shall use current demands available from the existing model during the calibration and existing system analysis. The City has the ability to link billing records directly to model nodes. Modeling maximum day demand conditions shall be accomplished by peaking average day demand at each node by the ratio of maximum day demand (MDD)/ADD. Peak hour demand (PHD) shall be simulated by similarly escalating demand at each node. Maximum Day and Peak Hour Demands will be determined using SCADA information provided by the City. Five and twenty-year demand projections, developed in Task 3, will be used to model future system capacity. Distribution of future demand will be the same as the distribution of existing demand, except in known areas of new development or expansion. Perform Model Calibration Consultant shall perform a steady state calibration analysis. The calibration shall compare field pressures and flows with those computed by the hydraulic model. Field pressures and flows will be compared with model simulated pressures and flows to verify the accuracy of the model. Agreement between field and model pressures is targeted at less than 5% overall difference. Agreement between field and model flows is targeted at less than 20% overall difference. Modifications to the model's frictions factors, demand allocation and valve status may be required in order to achieve the desired level of accuracy. Perform the Existing and Future Domestic and Fire Flow Analysis The following basic scenarios will be evaluated under existing and future conditions (2010 and 2025): Average Day Demand. (ADD), Maximum Daily Demand (MDD), Peak Hour Demand (PHD) and Fire Flow. Non -fire flow modeling under ADD, MDD, and PHD conditions shall be undertaken to establish compliance with system pressure requirements as identified by the City. The objective of these analyses will be to ensure water can be provided to customers under acceptable and required pressure and flow criteria. Where those criteria cannot be met, per modeling results, Consultant shall develop improvements that address deficiencies. Improvements will be developed in recognition of those developed during the previous modeling effort. Fire flow modeling will form the bulk of the modeling effort because fire flow is typically the defining criteria for establishing distribution main sizing. The modeling effort shall employ software capabilities that enable "batch" or simultaneous simulation of multiple individual fire flow conditions, each at different locations within the modeled system. Approximately 50 separate fire flow evaluations are anticipated at key locations. Consultant sha l propose the fire flow locations and solicit concurrence from City staff prior to undertaking the modeling runs. Perform a Redundancy Analysis This analysis allows the user to evaluate system redundancy from a piping perspective. This process allows the user to perform hundreds of simulations by batch processing, that essentially break every pipe in the system, one a time, to identify where "system critical" piping exists that should have redundancy. The addition of piping for redundancy may also be added to the Capital Improvement Program. Meet with the City, Deliver the Model and Document the Analysis Consultant shall prepare a brief discussion of model development, calibration procedures, modeling criteria, objectives, and related procedures for inclusion in the Plan to document and substantiate the basis for the developed improvements. This discussion shall replace, in full, the discussion and results of the modeling activity from the existing Plan. Consultant shall prepare a map showing the location and flow rate of each of the fire flows simulated for inclusion in the Plan. The results of the modeling runs will be presented in a table. The fire flow modeling results shall also be displayed on a color -coded map of the system to show the spatial distribution of fire flow deficiencies. Improvements developed to mitigate modeled deficiencies shall be prioritized based on several criteria including: available fire flow, the number of residential customers affected, the type of development affected (i.e. schools, hospitals, and nursing homes will have high priority), and other criteria to be developed in consultation with the City. A key objective of this hydraulic modeling task is development of improvements to alleviate deficiencies. These improvements will be developed through a series of modeling runs that involve insertion of pipeline improvements, such as replacement and up-sizing of existing mains and implementation of new mains. Consultant shall summarize distribution system improvements in tabular format displaying a brief description of each improvement, the mitigation rationale for the improvements, the priority ranking assigned to the improvement, and an identification number that correlates with a graphical presentation of the improvements. The graphical display of the improvements shall be presented on the system map. This task will, include a meeting with City staff at the conclusion of the modeling to discuss the processes used during the analysis. Updated EPANet V2.0 files of the existing and future system will also be delivered to the City at the conclusion of the modeling. Assumptions; The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. This scope and budget assumes that the current development of well sources on an as needed basis at regular intervals will continue. The evaluation of a more centralized approach to water supply is required from either ground or surface water sources is not included as part of this scope and budget. Deliverables: An updated Hydraulic Analysis section will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Updated existing and future EPANet files will be delivered to the City. Task 6. Water Quality Analysis/Model Selection and Training (Optional) An optional task has been included that is comprised of two components: 1. Water Quality and Source Tracing Analysis 2. Model Selection and Staff Training Water Quality and Source Tracing Analysis The calibrated steady state model will require some additional information in order to be used as an extended period and water quality model. An accurate diurnal curve will need to be loaded, for both summer and winter conditions. The City has this information available from the SCADA system. In addition, set points will need to be added for all wells and booster stations in the system that are controlled by reservoir level or pressure. The extended period model will then require validation over a period of days in comparison to SCADA information. Extended period calibration is a qualitative process versus the quantitative process used in the steady state calibration. Comparison of trends in when wells and pumps turn on and off and how reservoirs empty and fill are primarily used. An analysis of water age will be conducted under summer and winter conditions to identify areas of stagnant water in system storage and within the distribution system. Graphics of water age contours will be developed to illustrate this. Potential changes in operations or new pipes will be identified to address the stagnant water issues. The upcoming Stage 2 disinfectant by-product rule, will require utilities to sample at representative locations throughout the system. The water age analysis will provide the City with information on likely candidate locations for that monitoring. A second analysis to trace sources under winter and summer conditions will also be conducted. Operational settings for different seasons will be required. This analysis may assist the City in dealing with some of the localized water quality issues from particular wells. The overall calibration and analysis process will be documented as a technical memorandum. Model Selection and Staff Training A second optional task is available to assist the City in selecting and purchasing a 3rd party piece of modeling software. A comparison matrix of all industry standard software will be provided to the City as well as demonstrating the software or coordinating vendor presentations. Consultant will provide a recommendation to the City on what piece of software to purchase. Once the software has been selected, up to 24 hours of software specific training will be provided to City staff. Assumptions:, The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. One draft and ane final copy of the water quality modeling technical memorandum will be provided. Deliverables: A technical memorandum on water quality modeling within the City will be provided .focused on water age and source tracing. A recommendation to the City on what piece of 3rd party software to purchase will be provided. Up to three (3) days of training will be provided on the City's model using the selected piece of software. Task 7. Water Quality and Regulations Consultant will update Chapter S in the existing Plan based on any changes in water quality and state or federal regulations. Consultant will summarize the City's compliance status with respect to current and anticipated future drinking water regulations. Descriptions of current and anticipated future requirements will be brief. Much of this discussion will be taken from the existing Plan. Consultant will provide updated narrative descriptions where applicable. Water quality data supporting updating of this section will be provided by the City by marking up hardcopies of existing Pian or by updating electronic files of the same provided by Consultant to the City. Consultant's responsibilities with respect to this analysis shall be to incorporating updated information provided by the City, and will not involve review of laboratory or other raw data documentation. Assumptions: The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. Deliverables: An updated Water Quality section will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Task 8. Capital Improvement Plan Consultant shall prepare an improvement program that meets the requirements of the City. A proposed piping grid will be identified for future growth areas including the extended impact area. Supply and piping will be quantified for future growth areas, although no specific locations will be provided. City will provide general locations and sizing for storage. The improvement program will be presented as a table listing system improvement 9 projects identified and described in previous sections of the Plan. Minimal text is anticipated for this section of the Plan. Two meetings are included in this task, the first is a preliminary evaluation of improvements to ensure agreement on general direction with City staff. The second meeting/ workshop will focus on prioritizing and timing of proposed projects. Order of magnitude cost estimates will be provided with all proposed improvements. Assumptions: The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. The City will provide cost information for recent pipe, well and pump station construction to the Consultant for use in the CIP. Consultant will provide cost information for reservoirs and do a cursory evaluation of the cost information provided by the City. No more than two meetings to discuss the CIP with the City is included in this scope. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. Deliverables: An updated CIP section will be delivered as an overall chapter in the Plan. Task 9. Document Preparation/Final Presentation Consultant shall prepare a draft version of the Plan and a final version of the Plan. The cost of preparing these draft and final versions are substantial. Thus, if additional draft versions become necessary or requested by the City, the budget for this task will need to be amended. Draft Plan Upon completion of the Plan, Consultant will prepare a preliminary draft of the Plan for submittal to the City for its review. The preliminary draft is intended for internal review by City staff and not for distribution to other agencies. Two copies of the preliminary draft will be prepared and submitted by Consultant to the City. City staff shall coordinate, adjudicate, and summarize all City comments onto a single Plan set edited in red ink or red pencil for submittal to Consultant. Consultant shall address review comments with City staff by telephone conference call. Revision of Draft Plan Consultant will revise the draft Plan as necessary and appropriate based on the comments provided by City staff. Final Plan and Presentation Consultant shall prepare six copies of a revised, Final Plan, incorporating the City's draft comments, for re -submittal to the City. Time has also been included in this task for a final presentation to City staff/ council. Assumptions: The City will provide all information required to develop this section and will be available in a timely manner for meetings and review. All information provided by the City to be included in the Plan will be delivered in an electronic format. Up to three weeks has been allocated for draft plan review time by the City. Draft will be black and white, double sided, with page separators. Final Plan will be printed in color, double sided with tab dividers. No appendices or supporting documents will be included in the Plan and no 10 additional documentation outside the main body of the text has been included in this budget. Deliverables: Two copies of a draft Plan will be prepared for City review. Six copies of the Final PIan will be delivered to the City. The Plan will also be delivered on CD in PDF format for electronic distribution. The Executive Summary will be delivered in electronic format as part of the PDF and may be reproduced by the City for public distribution as needed. Project Management and Meetings Consultant shall set up internal accounting files and project numbers. Consultant shall prepare internal project instructions and internal quality control plan and distribute these to project staff and applicable functional leadership team members. Consultant's project manager shall coordinate and review work activities of the project team. Consultant shall prepare and submit invoices to the City on a monthly basis. Consultant shall accompany invoice with a brief status report of one-page or less. A number of project meetings and workshops have been identified throughout the planning process. Project meetings have been included in the task that they are associated with. Project management time and a nominal number of hours for accounting has also been included in each task. Project Schedule Consultant proposes to set dates for up to six (6) intermediate meetings/workshops with City staff at the kick-off meeting. These meetings/workshops will ensure that the each task has been discussed and agreed upon by City staff before proceeding and will help maintain the overall project schedule. Project Budget The work described herein will be managed and billed on a time and .materials basis with a not -to -exceed amount of $78,346.43 as enumerated in Exhibit B for tasks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9. Task 6 is an optional task that may be contracted at the City's discretion of $20,280.86. CLIENT: CITY of Meridian C112M HILL, INC: Signature Signature Name (printed) Name (printed) Title Title Date Date Exhibit B - Payment Task Order Domestic Water System Master Plan Update City of Meridian March 28, 2005 Table 1 shows the staff hour estimate and total cost per task. Task Hours Task Total 1 - Executive Summary 42 $4,957.38 2 - Existing System Description 40 $4,701.94 3 - Water Requirements 38 $4,688.84 4 - Water Supply and Storage 67 $8,154.00 5 - Distribution/Hydraulic Analysis 282 $27,368.57 6 - (Optional) Water Quality 198 $20,280.86 Modeling/Model Selection 7 - Water Quality and Regulations 30 $3,727.61 8 - Capital Improvement Plan 84 $8,970.26 9 - Document Preparation 159 $15,777.83 Total Non -Optional Tasks 742 $78,346.43 1 OF 1 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING Aprif 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5 - REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Wafer Main Easement for Central Valley Corporate Park No. 7 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: See attached CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: Mkr ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Sfaff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. To: Mayor de Weerd & City Council From: Karie Glenn CC: Fife ©ate: 3/29/2005 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 415105 City Council Meeting City of Meridian Public Works Dept. R E C E I NV fn�l D sI " � 2005 i:; C,Y Of Meridian City c lerl� office The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the 415105 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Central Valley Corp Park #7. Typical Sanitary Sewer and (Nater Main Easement. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Central Valley Corp Park #7 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. 0 Page 1 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 20 between , the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right -of way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed therein violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement EASMT.S&W MAIN. doc THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part -thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR:a President Secretary STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this day of ,YAW __, 20 Peif-ore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared -jT?&J and , known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. ^ 4�•••��I� err NOTARY P IC FOR IDAHO = o oI AR X • % Residing at: ..ZQzcCI I.�•'" Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement EASMT.kw •"+. .•' ,'` GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk Approved By City Council On: STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) On this day of , 20_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: Commission Expires; Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement EASMT.S&W MAIN.doc IDAHO 1450 East Watertower St. Suite 150 SURVEY Meridian, Idaho 83642 GROUP Phone (208) 846-8570 Fax (208) 884-5399 Project No. 04-134-03 November 18, 2004 Revised January 24, 2005 Exhibit "A" Description for City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement Lot 22, Block 2 Central Valley Corporate Park #6 Subdivision A strip of land being a portion of Lot 22, Block 2, Central Valley Corporate Park No. 6 Subdivision as fled in Book 76 of Plats at Pages 7960 — 7964, records of Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 22;. Thence along the easterly boundary line of said Lot 22 South 00°27'58" West, 32.04 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said easterly boundary line South 00°27'58" West, 31.00 feet; Thence leaving said easterly boundary line North 89°14'44" West, 218.85 feet; Thence South 00°28'00" East, 104.38 feet; Thence South 89°32'00" West, 32.10 feet; Thence North 00°28'00" West, 21.12 feet; Thence North 89032'00" East, 12.10 feet; Thence North 00°28'00" West, 83.69 feet; Thence North 89°14'44" West, 121.83 feet; Thence North 00'45'16" East, 20.00 feet;, Thence South 89°14'44" East, 119.75 feet; Thence North 00°22'45" West, 26.38 feet; Pr-afessionaI Lana 5urvr-vnrc Thence South 89143'16" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°22'45" East, 15.55 feet; Thence South 8911444" East, 221.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 12,520 square feet, more or less. Prepared By: Idaho Survey Group, P.C. L 015 7�.pf 4F Patrick J. Scheffler, P J. SCS' rZ '6Z ' - - - i ------------------------ i oN I � l J I 1 _ I I I I I I i 'DO k i 9Z� . N► � NI L ' } LINE TABLE s N t z-1 LTJ I 4 I N I C7 k 001 Z � t I O N 1 J I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 [ I RevJAN. 24. 2005 I i I 1 ZZI L I/ JL. I U 5 89'32"00" W L18 21.12 N 00'28'00" IN L19 12.10 N 89'32'00" E L20 83.69 N 00'28'00" W L21 121.83 N 89'14'44" W ` 1 L22 20.00 N 00'45'16" E 1� L23 119.75 S 89'14'44" E L24 26.38 N 00'22'45" W L25 20.00 S 89'43'16" E ®ro-) L26 15.55 q r NtV[JtU 1--L4—Uo Jas NO. PHASE 2 & 3 EASEMENT EXHIBIT "B" FOR CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE SHEET04-14 r.. -11 - ,____---- ---�-- -- � �-- - -- - - �a I l OZ71 T EASEMENT LINE TABLE: LINE TABLE s N LINE LENGTH BEARING c L13 32.04 S 00'27'58" W o L14 31.00 S 00'27'58" W L I/ JL. I U 5 89'32"00" W L18 21.12 N 00'28'00" IN L19 12.10 N 89'32'00" E L20 83.69 N 00'28'00" W L21 121.83 N 89'14'44" W ` 1 L22 20.00 N 00'45'16" E 1� L23 119.75 S 89'14'44" E L24 26.38 N 00'22'45" W L25 20.00 S 89'43'16" E ®ro-) L26 15.55 q r NtV[JtU 1--L4—Uo Jas NO. PHASE 2 & 3 EASEMENT EXHIBIT "B" FOR CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE SHEET04-14 r.. -11 - ,____---- ---�-- -- � �-- - -- - - Aphl 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO.-.� REQUEST Approve Beer, Wine and Liquor License Renewals AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Ernailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-K REQUEST Development and Temporary License Agreement for Snake River Racing Club`s Remote Control Race Track AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emalled: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached CITY OF MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT AND TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 51.&' day of 2005) by and between the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City", and the Snake River Racing Chub. WHEREAS, Snake River Racing is a organization dedicated to the promotion of and sanctioned racing of remote control cars in Meridian and Western Ada County; and WHEREAS, Snake River Racing and the City desire to cooperate to improve recreation opportunities for youth and the residents of Meridian and Western Ada County; and WHEREAS, the City has a 5 -acre parcel being held for future expansion of Meridian Police Department facilities, and WHEREAS, the City desires to designate a portion of the 5 -acre parted as a temporary Special Use facility to support Club activities and provide recreational opportunities to the general public until such time as the parcel is needed for other City purposes. WHEREAS, the City is willing, upon certain terms and conditions, to provide non- exclusive, temporary use of a designated portion of the parcel for a remote control race track for a period of time defined within this Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: I . USE AND GRANT OF TEMPORARY LICENSE For and in consideration of promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, City hereby gives and grants to Snake River Racing the non-exclusive right, privilege and license to use certain real property, approximately 250 feet by 175 feet in size, located near the Meridian City Police facility on Watertower Drive and as generally depicted on Exhibit ,AF (the "licensed premises") for Snake River Racing/Remote Control Race Track according to the tens and conditions contained herein. This Iicense does not extend to Snake River Racing the right to use the licensed premises to the exclusion of City or the general public, except during those tunes when the licensed premises have been reserved for Snake River Racing events according to the terms of this Agreement. City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page i of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property 2. TERM OF AGREEMENT This temporary license is granted for a team of one (l) year from the date of execution, and shall automatically renew in one (1) year increments until otherwise terminated by either party according to the tennination provisions contained herein. 3. DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THE LICENSED PREMISES The licensed premises shall be constructed and maintained by Snake River Racing in accordance with the following provisions: Development of the licensed premises shall be completed within 6 months of the date of execution of this agreement. A. Park rules and regulations and applicable city ordinances shall be observed, and the granting of this Agreement by City does not imply any approval of any required City building and/or use permits. B. Snake River Racing understands that the licensed premises is first and foremost a public facility and must obtain permission from City prior to the start of any earth work, grading or construction. After the completion of construction, the Iicensed premises shall be open and available to the general public when not otherwise scheduled for Snake River Racing events. C. Snake River Racing shall work with the City to provide a detailed Master Plan as approved by the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners for which construction shall be designed and built. D. Snake River Racing agrees to develop the facility to City construction specifications, in conjunction with the City, and all construction shall require a building pen -nit prior to the start of construction. E. Snake River Racing agrees to maintain records of donations and record volunteer labor hours and provide the City copies of such records every six (6) months during the construction period. F. Snake River Racing agrees to perform the following site maintenance during their scheduled use of the site: place a minimum of two trash receptacles at each end of the race track, the City shall provide the necessary trash receptacles and receptacle liners; remove the garbage from all trash receptacles and place in designated trash container at the end of each day that practice or competition is scheduled; and provide portable toilets as necessary. G. Except as provided herein, no admission charges shall be permitted for regular racing or any other regular activity of Snake River Racing. In the event that City of Meridian & Snake ,River Racing Page 2 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property an admission fee is charged for admission to the Iicensed premises, each person seeking admission shall sign a waiver of liability containing language as set forth in exhibit``6 . In the event that the person seeking paid admission is under the age of 18, the liability waiver shall be signed by the person's parent or legal guardian. Snake River Racing shall submit the signed waivers to City within five days of their execution. 4. CONDITIONS OF USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. It is understood that during construction that the licensed premises shall be secured in a manner that reduces the opportunity for injury to anyone entering the property. B. It is understood and agreed by the parties that City has no obligation to pay for construction of the licensed premises or any other City property associated with or adjacent to the licensed premises unless agreed to within the body of this document or in writing and attached to this License Agreement. City makes no warranty or promise as to the condition, safety; usefulness or habitability of the licensed premises and Snake River Racing accepts the licensed premises "as is". 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE Snake River Racing indemnifies City and holds City harmless from any loss, liability, claim or action for damages or injury to Snake River Racing, or personal property, or their employees, agents, guests or business invitee(s) attending or participating in any Snake River Racing event, or practice and arising out of or resulting from the condition of the licensed premises or any lack of maintenance or repair thereon. It is further understood and agreed Snake River Racing shall not be considered agents of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in their use and occupancy of the licensed premises, and Snake River Racing hereby agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any loss, liability, claim or action from damages or injuries to persons or property in any way arising out of or resulting from the use and occupancy of the LICENSED premises by Snake River Racing, their agents, employees, guests or business invitee(s) attending or participating in any organized Snake River Racing event. If any claim, suit or action is filed against City for any loss or claim described in this paragraph, Snake River Racing, at City's option shall defend City and assume all costs, including attorney's fees, associated with the defense or resolution thereof, or indemnify City for all such costs and fees incurred by City in the defense or resolution thereof, however the City shall not be relieved hereby from liability for its own negligence or that of its employees. In addition, Snake River Racing shall maintain, and specifically agrees to maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance in which City City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page 3 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property shall be named insured in the minimum amount as specified in the Idaho Tort Claims Act set forth in Title 6, Chapter 9 of the Idaho Code. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City; and if City becomes Liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, Snake River Racing covenants and aggress to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property occurring as a result of attending or participating in any organized Snake River Racing event. Snake River Racing shall provide City with a certification of insurance or other proof of insurance evidencing Snake River Racing compliance with the requirements of the paragraph and file such proof of insurance with: City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street As-eAKe- Meridian, Idaho 83642 In the event the insurance minimums of the Idaho Tort claims Act are changed, Snake River Racing shall immediately submit Proof of Compliance with the changed limits. 6. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES A. The City shall apply for and pay associated fees for all City and County permits and applications for construction purposes for improvements to the licensed premises and adjacent facilities. B. The City shall provide project inspections during construction to assure that all improvements are constructed to the approved specifications. C. The City will construct the necessary curb cut, temporary parking lot, landscape buffer, and provide water and electricity to the site. It is understood that Snake River Racing and the City are working together to jointly develop the Meridian Police Department property facility_ There may be situations where the two parties agree to exchange financial responsibility for development iterns, and in such instances, this Agreement shall be amended to memorialize any changes to the responsibilities of the parties set forth herein. 7. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason upon sixty (60) day notice. In such event, Snake River Racing shall be required to remove all personal property and otherwise vacate the licensed premises on or before the expiration of the sixty (60) day period. In the event of a holdover by Snake River Racing beyond the sixty (60) day period, City, in addition to and without waiver of any other rights or remedies it may have, may immediately re-enter and take City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page 4 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property possession and expel Snake River Racing from the licensed premises, with or without process of law. In the event of re-entry by City, Snake River Racing shall be liable for any damages suffered by City, its agents or employees, and any costs, including legal expenses and attorneys fees, incurred by City in recovering the licensed premises. 8. DEFAULT AND NON -WAIVER If Snake River Racing is in breach or default of any terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement and fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within ten (10) days of written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights of Snake River Racing conferred by this Agreement, at City's option, may be deemed terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. City's waiver on one or more occasion of any breach or default of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or a different term, covenant or condition, nor shall such waiver operate to prejudice, waive or affect any right or remedy City may have under this Agreement with respect to such subsequent default or breach by Snake River Racing shall be liable to City for all damages and costs, including legal expenses and attorney's fees, suffered or incurred by City in the enforcement of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of the Agreement. 9. SURRENDER OF LICENSED PREMISES Upon the expiration or earlier termination or cancellation of this AGREEMENT, Snake River Racing agrees to quit and surrender the licensed premises to City without causing or suffering any waste thereon.. 10. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER Snake River Racing shall not assign, sublet or transfer the LICENSED premises, or any portion thereof, or cause or suffer any alterations thereto, other than as specified in this Agreement, without the express written consent of City. 11. NOTICES A. All notices to be given with respect to this Agreement shall be in writing addressed as follows: To Snake River Racing: Jeff Oviatt 7325 Hummel Drive Boise, ID 83709 City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page 5 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property To City: City of Meridian Director, Parks and Recreation Dept. 11 West Bower Street Meridian, ID 83642 With a copy to: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho & Aven"e- Meridian, ID 83642 B. Notice shall be either delivered or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested to the party to be notified at the address specified above, or such other address as either party may designate in writing. Every notice shall be deemed to have been given at the time it is deposited in the United States mail, or upon delivery to the party above specified, or their agent or legal representative. 12. ALTERATIONS Snake River Racing shall not make, or permit to be made, alterations on or to the licensed premises without first obtaining "City's" written consent. Additions to, or alterations of, the licensed premises shall become at once a part of the real property and belong to City. Snake River Racing shall keep the licensed premises free from any liens arising out of any work performed for, materials furnished to, or obligations incurred by Snake River Racing. 13. INSPECTION OF LICENSED PREMISES Snake River Racing acknowledges that Snake River Racing has inspected the licensed. premises and does hereby accept the licensed premises as being in good and satisfactory order, condition, and repair. Snake River Racing agrees that upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, including the expiration of its term, Snake River Racing shall surrender the licensed premises to City in the same good condition as received, reasonable wear and tear, damages by fire, or act of God exempted. 14. INSPECTION Snake River Racing shall permit City and "City's" contractors and employees, at any time, to enter the licensed premises for the purposes of inspection for compliance with the terms of this Use Agreement and for the exercise of "City's" rights, the posting of notices, and for all other lawful purposes. 15. APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page b of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property This Agreement shall not be effective for any purpose whatsoever until it is approved by the resolution of the City Council. and executed by the Mayor. By the granting of this License, the City Council is not obligating itself, the City of Meridian, its officers or agents, with regard to any other discretionary action relating to development or operation of said licensed premises. Such discretionary actions include, but are not limited to, the granting or rezoning, variances, use permits, environmental clearances, or any other govermnental agency approval that is required by law. 16. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement and the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations, legal representative, successors and assigns of the parties. 17. PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERCEDED This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties as it pertains to the licensed premises. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their names the day and year first above written. CITY OF MERIDIAN: SNAKE RIVER RACING: B. Y By: *J7 ent, Snake River Racing Board Approved by City Council 4 — S- D 5 - Attest:' BY: KX, B J b� WilliamC. B , Ciry Vice -Press ent, S�Riverkacing Board BY' orQ�ti- Secretary, Snake River Racing Board City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page 7 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: I By: By: 0 Dire r, Parks & Rec tion. President, Parks & Recreation Commission �f J'- By. t/�/ /I B f Y• City Attorney `,chief of Police City of Meridian & Snake River Racing Page 8 of 8 Development and License Agreement Meridian Police Department Property EXHIBIT "B" READ CAREFULLY WAIVER AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY The City of Meridian has made the site of the remote control race track facility available to the general public for recreational purposes at no charge, and Meridian is therefore entitled to certain statutory limitations on liability as set forth in Idaho Code section 36-1604. From time to time, Snake River Racing may charge entrance or admission fees for certain events at the facility, Because any type of charge associated With the use of the facility may put Meridian's statutory limitations of liability at risk, this form is to be completed prior to admission to the facility in the event that an admission or entrance fee is charged by Snake River Racing. In consideration of The City of Meridian providing the use of city facilities for the use of the Snake River Racing Club, I agree as follows: I understand that the activities at the remote control race track and associated facilities may have an element of hazard or inherent danger and I assume all risks and dangers and take full responsibility for my actions and physical condition. I agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Meridian and its employees from any liability loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees, medical and ambulance costs) that I may incur while participating in or observing activities at the facility. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE WAIVER AND RELEASE AND BY SIGNING IT AGREE. IT IS MY INTENTION TO EXEMPT AND RELIEVE THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM LIABILITY FOR PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE OR WRONGFUL DEATH CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OR ANY OTHER CAUSE. DATE PARTICIPANT NAME PARTICIPANT ADDRESS PHONE CITY/STATE DATE OF BIRTH PARENT/GUARDIAN SIGNATURE SIGNATURE OF PARTICIPANT (If less than 18 yrs of age) April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-. REQUEST Professional Services Agreement for Real Estate Acquisition Services, The Igo Company AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS See attached Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made this 3 day of i� , 2005, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and The Igo Company, P.O. Box 1551, Boise, Idaho 83701, hereinafter referred to as "IGO", a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho. PREMISES: A. Whereas, City has the need to contract with a real estate professional from time to time for future park and general municipal real property needs; and, B. 'Whereas, IGO has proposed to contract with CITY on an as -needed basis according to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope of Services: a. For as -needed services for the acquisition of parkland properties, IGO shall perform all services, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Business Matters for Discussion" dated November 19, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. b. For as -needed services related to future non -parkland municipal real estate acquisition needs, CITY and IGO shall negotiate individual task orders. 2. Time of Performance: This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire on September 30, 2005 unless earlier terminated or extended. The agreement shall automatically be renewed for each successive fiscal year unless otherwise terminated. 3. Indemnification and Insurance: IGO shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred IGO, its servants, agents, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of CITY or its employees. CITY shall indemnify and save and hold harmless IGO from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused by or incurred by CITY, its servants, agents, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of IGO or its Agreement — Real Estate Acquisition Services — page 1 of 5 employees. This mutual agreement to indemnify and save and hold harmless shall not be limited by any insurance limits and each party covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless the other party from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property to the extent of liability caused by the party providing indemnification to the party seeking to be indemnified. In addition, IGO shall maintain and specifically agrees that it will maintain, through the term of this Agreement, General Liability insurance, in which CITY shall be named an additional insured and Professional Errors and Omissions in which CITY shall not be named an additional insured in the minimum amount as specified in the Idaho Tort Claims Act set forth in Title 6, Chapter 9 of the Idaho Code. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance Iimits herein provided, IGO covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property. IGO shall provide CITY with a Certificate of Insurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing IGO's compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with CITY. In the event the insurance minimums are changed, IGO shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Additionally, IGO shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance, in the statutory limits as required by law unless not required by law. 4. )independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, IGO shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither IGO nor any officer, employee or agent of IGO will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY. 5. Compensation: For assigned Parkland acquisition services, IGO shall be compensated pursuant to and as specified in attached Exhibit "A." For non - parkland assignments, consulting fees shall be at the same hourly rate as set forth in Exhibit "A" and shall be credited against any subsequent acquisition commission, if any. Flat fee acquisition commissions for non -parkland acquisitions to be negotiated on a task order basis shall be in the range of 3.5% to 5% of the acquisition budget. 6. Method of Payment: IGO will invoice the City of Meridian Accounting Department at 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 directly for all current amounts earned under this Agreement at the end of each month. The CITY will pay all invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt. 7. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed Agreement — ReaI Estate Acquisition Services — page 2 of 5 communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 The Igo Company J. Martin Igo P.O. Box 1551 Boise, ID 837011551 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 8. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys` fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 9. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 10. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that IGO shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. 11. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services required herein, IGO shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 12. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the City may require, there shall be furnished to the City such statements, records, reports, data and information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 13. Audits and Inspections: At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City for examination all of IGO's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement — Real Estate Acquisition Services — page 3 of 5 Agreement. IGO shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 14. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 15. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, IGO shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 16. Changes: The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Services to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of IGO's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and IGO, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Agreement. 17. Termination for Cause: If, through any cause, IGO, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to IGO of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, maps, studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs and reports prepared by IGO under this Agreement shall, at the option of CITY, become its property, and IGO shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder. Notwithstanding the above, IGO shall not be relieved of liability to CITY for damages sustained by CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by IGO, and CITY may withhold any payments to IGO for the purposes of offset until such time as the exact amount of damages due CITY from IGO are determined. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall not relieve IGO of its liability to CITY for damages. CITY understands and acknowledges that IGO has the right to terminate due to cause instigated by CITY. In that situation, IGO would have the same rights as CITY identified herein. .8. Termination for Convenience of CITY or IGO: CITY or IGO may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) days notice in writing to Agreement — Real Estate Acquisition Services — page 4 of 5 the other Party. If the Agreement is terminated by CITY, IGO will be paid an amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation as the services actually performed bear to the total services covered by this Agreement, less payments of compensation previously made. If this Agreement is terminated due to the fault of IGO or CITY, Section 17 hereof shall apply. 19. Construction and Severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 20. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 21. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 22, Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. The Igo Co J. Martin Igo, Desi ed Broker CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: Attest: WILLIAM G. BERG, J /, CITY CLERK Agreement — Real Estate Acquisition Services — page 5 of 5 November 19, ?003 Doug Strong, Director Parks & Recreation From: J. Martie Igo, CCIM Re: Business Matters for Discussion The following are business matters that are either controlled by state law or municipal philosophy, however, I would suggest that these are some of the business matters that need to be mutually agreed upon if we are to go forward with an acquisition strategy for the City of Meridian. Law of Agency: _enclosed is an Agency Brochure as well as a Buyer's Representation form, both of these forms must be provided to a representative of the City by your agent in each real estate transaction; and, the Agency Brochure is to be provided to any other princi.pat in a real estate transaction, by your. Broker/agent, in which the City is involved. Jdah.o Law requires certain Agency disclosure language to be in the purchase and sale agreement; I would want to meet with legal counsel for the City to discuss this point. Meridian Comprehensive Plan for Park Acquisition- -1 would want to discuss your plan for acquisition and determine priorities for acquisition. -I would want to discuss the City's policy for gills, donations and park naming rights in order to properly represent these Opportunities to the public. Purchase and Sale Agreerne t: -I would want the opportunity to review and possibly suggest modifications to the agreement that the City would want their Broker to use in an acquisition. 4. Acquisition Businef erins and Conditions: -This is directly related to the type of agreement, but it primarily is a discussion about how to buy property and the business path that Buyer and Seller would follow in a mutually acceptable real estate transaction. -Items for discussion would include: preferred title company, due diligence Process, coordination and cooperation expected by the Broker with other consultants such as engineers for surveys or environmental assessments, lawyers, appraisers, City Council member with oversight for Parks Department and the procedure for fielding acquisitions. 5. Appraisal: -The City of Meridian understands that J. Martin Igo is a licensed real estate broker in the State of Idaho and that he does not have appraiser credentials. -The City of Meridian understands that pursuant to the Idaho Real Estate Appraiser's Act, Mr. Igo is not able to perform appraisals for the City of Meridian. -A copy of the act and related information is enclosed. 6, Broker Services: It is my expectations that uny company would perforin the following services: -Provide available public information about the subject site -Make contacts with property owners and conduct negotiations for a business transaction under terms and conditions acceptable to the City. -Act as a fiduciary representative of the City and exclusively represent the City in property acquisitions that are specifically assigned to my company. -Act as Broker liaison between City and sub contractors of the City for all matters relating to fine acquisition process. Broker will not be responsible for hiring sub contractors or paying their contracts. -Act as a consultant for the City pursuant to specific assignments. -Acquire property desired by City for park use under business terrris and conditions that are Mutually acceptable to City and property owner and that include a. due diligence process that includes, but is not limited to, the City's approval of title, environmental and physical condition of the property to be acquired. 7. Proposed Tree Schedule: -For neighborhood size parks in the approximate size of 7 acres $13,500.00 -For community size parks in the approximate size of 20 acres $35,000.00 -For regional size parks in the approximate size of 40 acres $50,000.00 -Consulting Time for selected assignments -$150.00 per hour plus expenses related to the assignment that are approved and budgeted by City. -Consulting fees would be credited to any subsequent acquisition coniunissio.n. -Fees would be the lesser of the stated fixed fee or 50% of the real estate commission offered by a Broker who may have property listed that is acquired for a park. -All fees, except consulting fees, would be contingency fees that would only be paid at the closing of a real estate transaction under business teruns acceptable to City. April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT REQUEST Approve Bilis AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEFT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE; OTHER: Contacted: ___ . ... Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. April 5, 2005 ITEM NO. 5 - COMMENTS myolllj� April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 6-A-1 REQUEST Proclamation for Fair Housing Month AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS re CITY OF J�, m� 1 IDAHO The Office of the Mayor PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, April 2005 marks the 37th anniversary of the passage of Title VIII of Civil Rights Act of 1968, commonly known as the Federal Fair Housing Act; and WHEREAS, the Idaho Human Rights Commission Act has prohibited discrimination in housing since 1969; and WHEREAS, equal opportunity for all — regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status or national origin — is a fundamental goal of our nation, state and city; and WHEREAS, equal access to housing is an important component of this goal - as fundamental as the right to equal education and employment; and WHEREAS, housing is a critical component of family and community health and stability; and WHEREAS, housing choice impacts our children's access to education, our ability to seek and retain employment options, the cultural benefits we enjoy, the extent of our exposure to crime and drugs, and the quality of health care we receive in emergencies; and WHEREAS, the laws of this nation and our state seek to ensure such equality of choice for all transactions involving housing; and WHEREAS, ongoing education, outreach and monitoring are key to raising awareness of fair housing principals, practices, rights and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, only through continued cooperation, commitment and support of all Idahoans can barriers to fair housing be removed; THEREFORE, 1, Shaun Wardle, City Council President of the City of Meridian, do hereby proclaim April to be FAIR HOUSING MONTH April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. REQUEST Proposed Ordinance for Solid Waste Collection Program AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: 4,y 0� CITY SEWER DEPT: ,off A CITY PARKS DEPT: �V MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: r � J r J i/ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 6-B-2 REQUEST Tabled from March 29, 2005: Proposed Draft Ordinance for License Alcohol Establishments and Prohibiting Two License Establishments Within the Some Premise AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeiings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached March 25, 2005 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 29, 2005 APPLICANT City Attorney -- Bill Nary ITEM NO. 6-C-2 REQUEST Draft Ordinance for License Alcohol Establishments and Prohibiting Two Licens Establishments within the Some Premises AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached Draft Ordinance CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2 OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE REGARDING AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSED ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND PROHIBITING TWO LICENSED ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE SAME PREMISE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO.- Section DAHO:Section 1. That Title 3, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Meridian City Code is amended to read as follows: 3-2-2: LIQUOR BY THE DRINK: A. License Required: It shall be lawful to sell liquor by the drink within the City, as provided in Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23, provided a license shall first be obtained from. the City for the sale of liquor by the drink. B. Application For License; Fee: An applicant for a liquor by the drink license shall make application to the City Clerk, pay the license fee of seventy five percent (75%) of the amount of the license fee collected by the Director of the Department of Law Enforcement of the State pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23. If the license fee is paid prior to July 1, the fee shall be prorated, but if the license fee is paid after July 1, the fee shall not be prorated and shall be one-half (112) of the annual license fee. C. Investigation of Applicant: The application shall be submitted to the Chief of Police for investigation and report to the Mayor and City Council; the application must be approved by the Mayor and City Council D. More than One License ver Premise: No application for a second licensed establishment within the j2remise of an existing or proposed licensed establishment ma be approved. A premise is determined by the site plan, layout, room design of the existing or proposed premise in relation to the request for a second license. The Council may direct more information including building plans, architectural design, or building elevations to determine the applicability of this ordinance. The final decision of approval and interpretation of this ordinance shall rest with the Mayor and City Council. LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 1 of 3 E. License Transfer; Fee: Licenses may be transferred under the provisions of Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23, provided the transferee meets the requirements of a licensee, has paid a transfer fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) and the Mayor and City Council have approved of the transfer of the license. (Ord. 684, 12-20-1991) F: PENALTY: It shall be unlawful and punishable as a misdemeanor to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter. G: SEVERABILITY If any provision or section of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then such provision or section shall be considered separately and apart from the remaining provisions or sections of this Ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 2. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (112) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of , 2005. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of 2005. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST CITY CLERK LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 2 of 3 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 05 - PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT MERIDIAN CITY PUBLIC DISTURBANCES ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Title 3, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Meridian City Code A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective upon the passage and publication. City of Meridian Mayor and City Council By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk First Reading: Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902: YES NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 - The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 05- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this day of , 2005. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 1 Will Berg From: Bill Nary Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:57 PM To: 'Bill Musser; 'John Overton ; 'Anna Canning (canning a@ meridian city.o rg)'; Tammy de Weerd; Ted Baird; Will Berg Subject: Looking for input Here is a proposed amendment regarding the 2°d liquor license issue. Can I get some feedback. CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2 OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE REGARDING AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSED ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND PROHIBITING TWO LICENSED ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE SAME PREMISE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE TT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Title 3, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Meridian City Code is amended to read as follows: 3-2-2: LIQUOR BY THE DRINK A. License Required: It shall be lawful to sell liquor by the drink within the City, as provided in Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23, provided a license shall first be obtained from the City for the sale of liquor by the drink. B. Application For License; Fee: An applicant for a liquor by the drink license shall make application to the City Clerk, pay the license fee of seventy five percent (75%) of the amount of the license fee collected by the Director of the Department of Law Enforcement of the State pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23. If the license fee is paid prior to July 1, the fee shall be prorated, but if the license fee is paid after July 1, the fee shall not be prorated and shall be one-half (1/2) of the annual license fee. C. Investigation of Applicant: The application shall be submitted to the Chief of Police for investigation and report to the Mayor and City Council; the application must be approved by the Mayor and City Council D. More than One License per Premise: No application for a second licensed establishment within the premise of an existing or proposed licensed establishment ma be approved. A premise is determined by the site plan, la out room design of the existing or proposed premise in relation to the request for a second license. The Council mgy direct more information including building plans, architectural design, or building elevations to determine the gpplicability of this ordinance. The final decision of approval and inteEpretation of this ordinance shall rest with the Ma orand City Council_ LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 1 of 3 D. E. License Transfer; Fee: Licenses may be transferred under the provisions of Idaho Code chapter 9, title 23, provided the transferee meets the requirements of a licensee, has paid a transfer fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) and the Mayor and City Council have approved of the transfer of the license. (Ord. 684, I2-20-1994) F: PENALTY: It shall be unlawful and punishable as a misdemeanor to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter. G: SEVERABILITY If any provision or section of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then such provision or section shall be considered separately and apart from the remaining provisions or sections of this Ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 2. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (112) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of 2005. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of 2005. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 2 of NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 05 - PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT MERIDIAN CITY PUBLIC DISTURBANCES ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Title 3, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Meridian City Code A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective upon the passage and publication. City of Meridian Mayor and City Council By: William G. Begg, Jr., City Clerk First Reading: Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902: YES NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 - The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 05- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this day of March, 2005. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT AMENDMENT - Page 3 of 3 April 1, 2005 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING Apol 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 6-R-3 REQUEST Zoning Amendment to Ada County by Boise City AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS See aitached Date: Prone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shalt become property of the City of Meridian. 'oJ APR - 5 2505 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Proposed Ada County Zoning Code Amendment to Clarify 5% Growth Limitation Amend Cha ter 1 General Regulations, as follows: 5-1-2: PURPOSE: A. Carry out the intent and purposes of the "Local Land Use Planning Act," Idaho Code 67-6501 et seq. as amended; B. Carry out the policies of the applicable comprehensive plan by classifying and regulating the uses of property and structures within the unincorporated areas of Ada County; C. Establish zoning districts within Ada County in accord with the adopted applicable comprehensive plan in conformance with Idaho code 67-6511; that D management Establish and direction of growth in Ada County standards onsis consistent withlthe n� of all growth to areas comprehensive elan polices, Inc adopted including directing 95% areas �.p ., of cityimpact and limitinggrowth, outside of areas of city impact to n o more than 5%; E. Provide standards for the orderly growth and development of Ada County and to avoid undue concentration and population and overcrowding of land. As required by Idaho Code 67-6511, such standards include, but are not limited to; 1. The height, number of stories, size, construction, reconstruction........ Amend Chapter 2 BASE DISTRICT REGULATIONS as follows: ARTICLE B. RURAL BASE DISTRICTS 8-2A-1 B. ADDITIONAL PURPOSE STATEMENTS 2. Rural Residential District. Permit the development of rural residential uses where the property is annexed into a fire district, public street access is available, and such development would not require excessive expansion of public services, and such development can be accommodated without causing the total of rural and urban development outside of areas of city impact to exceed 5% of all countygrowth in any given year. 8-2A-6: NON-FARM SUBDIVISION: A. The purpose of the non-farm subdivision is to allow limited rural residential development where it will be compatible with existing uses in the vicinity and when it will not cause the total rural and urban development outside of areas of city impact to exceed 5% of all county growth in anv ggiven year. The purpose is also to provide standards to cluster rural residential development on a portion of a property in order to: B. Applicability. C. Process. 3. Required Findings. fn additional to the findings required for a preliminary plat, the Commission and/or Board shall make the following findings: a. The proposed non-farm subdivision meets the applicability requirements of Section 8 -2A -6B of this Title; and b. The proposed non-farm subdivision complies with standards of Section 8 -2A - 6D of this Title; and c. According to he activity, alae rot osed most subdivision will nocause the total all county . p.... � impact i, 5 /o of all�al and, urban development outside of areas _ s of city o exceed growth in any Oven vear. ARTICLE E. PLANNED COMMUNITY BASE DISTRICTS: 8-2E-4: APPLICATION REQUIRMENTS: An application for a planned Community shall be submitted. to the Director as specified. in Section 8-7A-2 of this Title, and shall contain the elements required by this Section. The Director shall determine the number of copies of the application required for the submittal. B. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan that includes the elements required by this Subsection, hereafter referred to as the Specific Plan. These documents and drawings shall provide sufficient information to evaluate future development applications to ensure that the development is consistent with the Ada Count Comprehensive Plan and that the planned services and amenities shall be provided for the anticipated population. 8. An assessment of development and population trends documenting the justification for development of a Planned Community outside of existing areas of city impact. This assessment shall include the total number of residential buildinjZ permits issued both within and outside of Ada County areas of city impact within the past .units Years, growth ., projections in numbers of dwelling two rare and outside of next fiou years, ., ns for the _ ve areas of im ac estimate � a a County p t• and an of how ma..., -- inside ,,..tion ted., ranted outside areas of impact without exceedin 5% total rwt y addi ' al e . ,. the is m li.. p �, in p � of.. � .owth the County over „the next five years. 14. A phasing plan indicating the sequence of development, general land uses, and anticipated commencement and completion times of each phase shall be provided, indicating land use types; total area contained; anticipated population levels; demonstration that the project, in conjunction with other known proiects and accepted growth trends, will not cause growth outside of areas of city impact to exceed 5% of total county growth_ and essential public - services. Essential public services adequate for the anticipated level of use of that phase shall be provided. The applicant shall also provide a written explanation of why phases should be developed in the proposed sequence and. how the progress of each phase shall be measured and monitored by the Director and the applicant andlor owner. Phasing shall be accomplished so that the integrity of the Planned Community is maintained at the end of any single phase, and so tat the County s not violate,,.. its Com.p.. reh ensive Plan „o licies,fo r directing95/ofrowth to areas of City impact and not exceeding 5/of County development outside of areasof city impact. 8-2E-7: REQUIRED FINDINGS: In order to approve a Planned Community application, the Board shall make the findings for a zoning ordinance amendment specified in Section 8-7-3C of this Title with the exception of Section 8-7-3C 1, and shall make the following additional findings: A. The proposal complies with all applicable local, State, and Federal plans and regulations; B. The proposed Planned Community provides a land development tool to accommodate population growth outside of existing areas of city impact; C. The proposal sets forth sufficient and adequate mitigation for the identified economic impacts beyond the normally expected incremental impacts on municipalities and other agencies and/or districts; and D. The rural . proposal, tr . p.i.,n Lg pla,n,,and in con.,ju"nction- with all other known -_e r kown rut !and/ouban approvals, will not cause growth outsrde of areasa city pact to exceed 5 of the total projected growth i n Ada CountVas established by the Ada County Comprehensive Plan. Proposed Ada County Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Clarify 5% Growth Limitation Amend the Introduction Section as follows: INTRODUCTION Most development applications in Ada County are reviewed under various policies of one of the five city -adopted comprehensive plans. During the next 20 -years, about 95% of the new residents of Ada County are expected to settle in or around the cities. As a result, it may be necessary to consider other planning mechanisms in order to accommodate future population. The Board of Ada County Commissioners (the Board) should have the opportunity and flexibility to consider large-scale developments that are unable to be accommodated within existing or roposed Areas of City Impactprovided at such r-lot...., ongoing rural develop men„ not tract from thebili -of the Areas of Cit Impact to continue to capture 9S%of the growth in Ada County. Amend the Population and Growth Cha ter as follows: 2.0 POPULATION AND GROWTH 2.1 Population Goal Stateinent Anticipate continuing growth and development demand. Guide future development to encourage orderly infill. Promote development that maintains or improves current levels of essential public facilities and services. Policies 2.1-1 Approximately 95% of new residential development should occur within each community's urban Service PlapRin Area of Impact. 2.1-2 Development that occurs outside an Area of City Impact shall comply with this Comprehensive Plan. 2.1-3 Continue coordination with Canyon, Elmore, Gem, Boise and Owyhee counties regarding regional planning. Address regional growth issues and support the goals and objectives of the Ada County Comprehensive Plan. 2.1-4 Annually evaluate population data and demographic forecasts to ensure that County Permittingoutside of Areas of City Impact is not exceeding 5% of total development in the County. 2.1-5 The Board recognizes the need to fully assess the land -use, public service, environmental and transportation impacts associated with any major new private or public development or activity center outside Areas of City Impact. For development that creates or encourages unanticipated employment and/or population shifts away from existing Areas of City Impact identified within the Ada County Comprehensive Plan, an assessment of these impacts shall be made by any prospective developer. If the assessment concludes that the development will cause a shift of employment and/or population outside Areas of City Impact in excess of 5% of total County growth, t ., he development should be denied, reduced in scale or modified with smaller phases, as appropriate. Amend the Land Use chapter as follows: 5.1 Land Use Goal Statement To enhance existing land uses and to balance and guide future development in order to maintain the living and working environment of Ada County. The land use element of the Comprehensive Plan is based on the following objectives: • MaintainW2 a combined rate of urban and rural develo ment outside Areas of CityIm act that does not exceed 5% of total growth in the County. • Supportingcifles in their efforts to accommodate urban growth and development within their areas of impact. • Protecting the rights of private land ownership. • Designating land for urban expansion. • Promoting compatible contiguous development and infill • Encouraging planned mixed uses along high volume traffic corridors. • Buffering lands adjacent to manufacturing areas and the Boise Airport. • Ensuring the integrity of residential neighborhoods. • Ensuring the integrity of rural aLTricultural and environmentally sensitive areas. • Encouraging the development of school and park sites. • Encourage multiple and year-round use of schools and other public facilities. • Ensuring compatible land uses to provide an optimum living and working environment. • Supporting housing opportunities for a diversified community. • Defining urban growth boundaries that describe where central water and sewer services are planned and that can reasonably accommodate 95% of all future develo ment In Ada Countv. Protecting and enhancing historical and cultural areas. April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT REQUEST Pudic Hearing - Parks and Recreation New t=ees ITEM NO. 10 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7;00 p.m. on April 5, 2005, for proposed new fees and fee increases to cover cost for the following recreation programs and services; More information on the above hearing is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, and is available for inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing, and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written materials should be submitted to the City Clerk no later than seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested parties may examine them prior to the hearing. All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. FEE Amount Late Reg. % of TITLE Change MEN'S SOFTBALL LEAGUE Team $700.00 * new BARN SOUR 1 Mile Fun Run $8.00 60.00% 5K Run $18.00 $23.00 20.00% 10K Run $18.00 $23.00 20.00% SUMMER SIZZLER Inline Skating $12.00 new BROCHURE YOUTH SOCCER $50.00 * new CERAMICS $12-$25 new PHOTOGRAPHY $36-$48 * new Tax is not included in fees. (*) Indicates fees that Meridian Parks & Recreation does not set. These fees are set by the private organization or vendor providing the service. Meridian Parks & Recreation typically retains 20% of the fee to cover the cost of the brochure & administration costs. Classes will be added and removed based on community interest and availability. The Page 1 of 2 same 80120 split will apply to all new classes DATED this 11th day of March, 2005 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK PUBLISH the 14th and 28th of March, 2005. Page 2 of 2 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 12 REQUEST Resolution approving Update to Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached Resolution CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: - V CITY PARKS DEPT: �ve MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented of public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. HJT _ ~ 0 7 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-8208(4), each time the City amends or modifies its development impact fee ordinance, it must also update the corresponding capital improvements plan; and, WHEREAS, on April 5, 2005, the City Council of Meridian held a hearing on the proposed update to the Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the update to the Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan is approved for the purpose of complying with Idaho Code section 67-820$(4). A copy of the plan is attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in fall force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of City of Meridian, Idaho day of 2005. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of 2005. APPROVED: i _ 3 ATTE T: CITY CLERK .L 3� 4/:;49 Cvah ti! 101-ef, EXHIBIT "A" PARKS AND RECREATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR PURPOSES OF UPDATING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE MINI -PARKS Generations Plaza .25 acres Small downtown plaza with seating and water feature Centennial Park .5 acres Downtown next to Boys & Girls Club, has a basketball Storey Park Swimming Pool 1 acre court, picnic space, open grass area and also provides Private Neighborhood Parks 50+ acres additional downtown parking Cox Monument .25 acres Small shelter located at City Hall on Idaho & Meridian Total 1 acre long terra lease with a private contractor for the NEIGHBORHOOD Chateau Park 6.75 acres Developed in 2002, grass areas and playground PARKS equipment 8th Street Park 4 acres Grass areas and playground equipment Total 10 314 acres UNITY PARKS Storey Park 15 acres Established park mature landscaping, ball fields, picnic facilities, and playground equipment Tully Park 18.5 acres New park with skate park, playround equipment, ball fields, and picnic facilites Bear Creek 18.5 acres New park with playground equipment, tennis courts, ball fields and picnic facilities Total 52 acres RBAN PARKS Meridian Settlers Park 26 acres devlp New park with playground, ball fields and picnic facilities 32 acres undevlp Park with be 58 acres, currently half is developed Total 26 acres eveloped Park Land Grand Total 89.75 acres Fuller Park 25 acres Park land owned and operated by the Western Ada Settler's Park 112 acre Recreation District Storey Park Swimming Pool 1 acre located within Storey Park Private Neighborhood Parks 50+ acres Small parks owned & operated by homeowners assns City Golf Course 919 acres The City owns the golf course but has entered into a long terra lease with a private contractor for the operation and maintenance. This lease is for $6,000 per year. 2 PROJECTS IN PROCESS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Based on historical data and calculations done to on those amounts. Projects are budgeted on a three establish the park impact fee amount it costs the City year start to finish timeline. Donations of time and $25,000 to purchase park land and $70,000 to labor are included in park costs and shown later in develop park land. Expected costs to finish on- this report as revenue. going projects and new projects are budgeted based ,PROJECTS• .-Expected Classification Name. sim Autumn Faire 6.9 acres PARKS Cost Project Description $483,000 Located in Autumn Faire subdivision, parcel provided by developer. The park is scheduled to be completed in 2006. Kiwanis Park 9.3 acres $648,900 Close to Mt View High School, completed in partnership with Daybreakers Kiwanis. The City will provide on-going maintenance and develop the park irrigation lake and irrigation system and green up the Park. The Kiwanis Club Champion Park 6 acres Police Station Park 5 acres will build the restroom and shelter buildings. $420,000 Located in the Park Stone subdivision near Eagle Rd and East Ustick Road. Completion is scheduled for 2005. $350,000 Located west of the Meridian Police Station on Watertower Ave. Slated for dog training facility and remote car rlacin lrackin . COMMUNITY PARKS Lochsa Falls Park 30.1 acres $2,107,000 Located along Ten Mile Road between McMillian Road and Chinden Boulevard. Scheduled for completion in 2010 McDermott 29 acres Cherry Ln Park (Borup Property) $2,030,000 Located near the northeast corner of Cherry Lane and McDermott Road. This is in the City's impact area rather then in the City. City sewer and water are not currently available so development has not started. The park is slated to be the site of the Meridian Lions Rodeo Grounds and an ice-skating rink. URBAN PARK Settlers Park $5,528,050 58 acre park located at the corner of Meridian Road and Ustick. The park development has been divided into two phases. The first phase is complete, the second phase is to be in Adventure Island Settlers Parks scheduled completed 2006. The second phase will be completed by Meridian Youth $1,000,000 Handicapped accessible playground located in Settlers Park phase I of the playground is complete, final completion is scheduled for 2006. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Impact Fee Budget to Date Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected PRO]ECT Eligible 9/30/2004 Budget FY05 Budget FY06 Budget FY07 Budget FY08 Budget FY09 Budget FY10 TOTAL Adventure Land Play-g-rGund YES $150,GOG $364,000 $4116,000 $1,000,000 Settlers Park Yes $1,006,069 $1,231,300 $1,210,682 $5,528,051 Kiwanis Park Yes $76,000 $286,450 $286,450 $648,900 Bear Creek Park Yes $709,800 11 Citamplon Park Yes $11,000 $1148,200 $135,900 $135,900 $431,000 Pollce Station Park Yes $10,000 $170,000 $170,000 $350,000 :11 $482,800 Lochsa falls Yes $147,000 $-50,000 $636,667 $636,667 $636,666 $2,107,000 McDermott - Clierry Lane Pa Yes $463,400 $10,000 $676,666 $676,666 67666t, $2,503,370 Centennial Park $75,000 $75,000 Storey Park $286,865 $20,000 $306,865 Downtown Trees $49,00D $49,000 7.5 acre park unidentified Yes $187,500 $187,500 Park Land Purchase Fund Yos $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 S250,000 $250,000 $250,000 DGVelOP PAFk Land Yes $700,000 $700,000 111 Park Department Matrit Building $650.000 $650,000 Recreation Center Yes 1 1 111 Pathway 111 LandscapingTOTNESsJz$1,626,111 1 .1 1 { ... ... $1,701,666 SI 9,T6rTFf_ moneyThe parkland purchase fund is to accumulate purchase park land as it comes available,S250,000 equates .. 1 acres. Starting in fiscal year 2008 $700,000. budgeted to. . 1 acres orpark land per year. FUNDING There are three sources of funding available for park capital development; general revenue from the governmental activities, park impact fees, and partnerships and donations. Park impact fees are collected when a residential building permit is sold. These fees can be used only to develop new parks or add capacity to existing facilities based on the underlying theory that new residents should help to pay for new parks and facilities built to serve them. Impact fees have become more and more important as the resource that has allowed Meridian to purchase and develop park land. The current impact fee is $667 per residential building permit. Due to the growth in building permits the City collected over $1.2 million in impact fees and fiscal year 2004, and will most likely do the same in fiscal year 2005. The calculation of the fee will be addressed annually or at a minimum every other year and the amount may be changed. General fund revenue has to come from the general tax funds used to operate Fire, Police, and other general government activities. From 1995 to 2004 the City spent several million dollars to purchase and develop 58 acres for a large urban park. Development is on-going and the park is not completed. From fiscal year 1995 through fiscal year 2004 the City has spent $10,402,175 on purchases of park land and park development. Of this amount 38% has been funded by the general fund, 42% by impact fees, and 20% by donations. Donations come from developers, partnerships with community organizations, or volunteer fund raising efforts. ACTUAL FUNDS Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual TOTAL USED PARK CAPITAL FY95-FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 GENERALFUND w r, .0 IMPACT FEES $1,146,069 $27,851 $347,315 $481,090 $773,554 $966,564 $3,742,443 DONATIONS $60,000 $82,962 $111,810 $323,108 $567,000 $228,391 $399,500 $1,772,771 Based on projections for sales of residential housing permits and the park impact fee staying the same the City will generate $7,926,464 from. 2005 through 2010 from impact fee revenue for new park development. Donations of $4,084,000 are expected for the same time period. This includes; $800,000 for Adventureland Playground, $1,200,000 for Settlers Park youth baseball fields, $435,700 for Kiwanis Park, $860,000 for Lochsa Falls PAL soccer fields, $260,800 for Champion Park, GRAND TOTAL $8,882,204 $187,500 donation of 7.5 acre parcel, and $340,000 for the dog facility and remote car racing track near the police station. The capital improvement plan for the same time period is $14,201,431. This means the City will need to appropriate $4,081,748 from the general fund or other sources if all projects in the capital improvement plan are completed, PARK IMPACT FEE Actual Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated - OVER REVENUE f 1 I 1. Estimate, 1 I: 19 , 1, Estimated Residential 2,000 1,800 1,683 1,467 17071 1,028 Housing Permits Park Impact Fee $667 $667 $667 $667 $667 $667 IMPACT FEES $639,989 $1,250,792 $1,334,000 $1,200,600 $1,122,561 $978,489 $714,357 $685,616 $6,035,683 57,926,464 DONATIONS $228,391 $399,500 $2,194,000 $1,520,000 $370,000 $4,084,000 $4,711,891 GENERAL FUND $182,822 $74,522 $4,081,746 $4,337092 GRANDTOTAL $14,201,431 $16,977,447 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 13 REQUEST Public Hearing - Park Impact Fee Methodology AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT. MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of fhe City of Meridian. MAYOR g City Attorney/HR Tammy de Weerd TV CITY OF _ Department 33 E. Idaho CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS '�, Ph.# 888-44331Fax 884-8723 Keith Bird0(/! �L/b�t�N^6 Christine Donnell 1.� Shaun Wardle IDAHO William L.M. Nary City Attorney/HR Director Charles M. Rountree 'Y� Ted W. Baird R°C4r'j'pgISUllfi��€?iGE 1903 Deputy City Attorney March 31, 2005 C E TV To: Mayor and City Council MAR 200-5 family dwelling City CI'1�`lciidiax3 CC: Will Berg, City Clerk City Clerk Office Doug Strong, Director of Department of Parks and Recreation Reta Cunningham., Finance Department $1,014.60 Members of the Development Impact Fee Committee From: Ted Baird, Deputy City Attorney Re: Park and Recreation Impact Fee Hearing on April 5, 2005 The recommendation of the Development Impact Fee Committee for an increase in the Park and Recreation Impact Fee is being considered at the April 5, 2005 City Council Meeting. The proposed methodology and fee increase are summarized as follows: Methodology to determine the park impact fee: Service standard of 4 acres per thousand .004 population Times the total cost to develop an acre $95,000.00 Equals the park development cost per person $380.00 Times the number of persons per single 2.93 family dwelling Equals the park development cost per single $1,113.40 family dwelling Times the number of persons per multi- 2.67 family dwelling Equals the park development cost per multi- $1,014.60 family dwelling Impact Fee Summary: Single -Family Multi -Family Park and Recreation Development Cost $1113.40 $1014.60 CIP surcharge $20.00 $20.00 Homeowner proportionate share adjustment (see 10-7-13(F)) ($36.22) ($36.22) Adjustment for City share of development costs (30%) ($334.02) ($304.38) Impact Fee Hearing Total Parks and Recreation Impact Fee $763.1.6 $694.00 The following two-step procedure to implement the impact fee increase is„required by Idaho Code sections 67-8206 and 67-8208: 1. Public hearing #1: Updated Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). a. Conduct the public hearing on the Parks and Recreation CTP. b. Consider approval of the proposed Resolution adopting the Parks and Recreation CIP. c. Note that the CIP is not being considered for budget purposes at this time. The CTP is being considered only for compliance with the statutory requirement that it be updated before an impact fee increase can be considered. 2. Public hearing #2: Amendments to the impact fee methodology and the impact fee increase. a. Conduct a public hearing on the impact fee methodology and increase. b. Consider approval of the proposed Ordinance to implement the recominendations of the Development Impact Fee Committee. c. If approved, the Impact Fee Increase will become effective in 30 days. Impact Fee Hearing (3) Your leave ends under the Family and Medical Leave Act, and you do not return to work. Qualifying Events for Covered Spouse- If you are the spouse of an employee, you will become a qualified beneficiary if you will lose your coverage under the Plan because any of the following qualifying events happens: (1) Your spouse dies; (2) Your spouse's hours of employment are reduced; (3) Your spouse's employment ends for any reason other than his or her gross misconduct; (4) Your spouse becomes enrolled in Medicare (Part A, Part B, or both); or (5) You become divorced or legally separated from your spouse. Qualifying Events for Covered Dependent Children - Your dependent children will become qualified beneficiaries if they will lose coverage under the Plan because any of the following qualifying events happens: (1) The parent -employee dies; (2) The parent -employee's hours of employment are reduced; (3) The parent -employee's employment ends for any reason other than his or her gross misconduct; (4) The parent -employee becomes enrolled in Medicare (Part A, Part B, or both); (5)The parents become divorced or legally separated; or (6) The child stops being eligible for coverage under the plan as a "dependent child." Should a Qualified Medical Child Support Order be filed in a divorce or legal separation, the City of Meridian agrees to follow the terms and conditions of the order under the provisions of the Health Plan. Notice Requirements The Plan will offer COBRA continuation coverage to qualified beneficiaries only after the Plan Administrator has been notified that a qualifying event has occurred. When the qualifying event is the end of employment or reduction of hours of employment, death of the employee, or enrollment of the employee in Medicare (Part A, Part B, or both), the employer must notify the Plan Administrator of the qualifying event within 30 days following the date coverage ends. For the other qualifying events (divorce or legal separation of the employee and spouse or a dependent child's losing eligibility for coverage as a dependent child), you must notify the Plan Administrator. The Plan requires you to notify the Plan Administrator within 60 days after the qualifying event occurs. If notice is not received within that 60 -day period, the dependent will not be entitled to choose continuation coverage. You must send this notice to: City of Meridian Attn: Human Resources 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642. If you do not choose continuation coverage within the 60 -day election period, your group health coverage will end the last day of the month following the qualifying event. -I- C..C)RR A RP.viCP.d fi lv 700*1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Meridian Proposed Revisions to the Parks Capital Improvements Plan Proposed Amendment to the Park Impact Fee Methodology Proposed Park Impact Fee Schedule Increase NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho including but not limited to Idaho Code section 67-8206 that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on 7ltesday, April 5, 2005 for the purpose reviewing and considering a revised Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Plan and proposed amendments to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee Methodology and Fee Schedule. The proposed revisions to the Capital Improvements Plan are an update to the information included in the 2003 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Action Plan and include a description of the current developed park inventory, park development projects in process, and a plan for additional park capital improvements through the 2010 fiscal year. The proposed revisions to the Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee Methodology and Fee Schedule are based on recommendations made by the Development Impact Fee Committee in September, 2004. Park and recreation impact fees are imposed on applications for new residential building permits so that a proportionate share of the cost of new public park facilities is borne by new residential developments which have been deemed to create an increased demand for park and recreation services. The proposed fee increases are summarized as follows: Fee Type Current Impact Fee Proposed Impact Fee Single Family Residence Unit $667.39 $763.16 Multi -Family Residence Unit $607.15 $694.00 The text of the proposed Ordinance amending the Impact Fee Methodology and Impact Fee Schedule, the proposed revisions to the Capital Improvements Plan and the proposed land use assumptions, fee calculations and proportionate share determinations are on file in the City Clerk's Office and are available for inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Copies of these materials are available upon request. Any and all persons interested in or affected by these proposals shall have the right to appear at the public hearing and present evidence regarding the proposals. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written materials may be submitted seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested parties may examine them prior to the hearing. All materials presented for the record at public hearings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. Dated this 17th day of March, 2005. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR, CITY CLERK PUBLISH 21st and 28th of March 2005. Impact Fee Hearing 3 April 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL. MEETING Apd] 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 14 REQUEST Ordinance - Revisions to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Methodology and the Park and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached Ordinance CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7, OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY AND THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE SECTION 10-7-13, AND TO THE IMPACT FEE SUMMARY SECTION 10-7-15; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee has considered various options for updating the park and recreation impact fee methodology and fee schedule and on September 15, 2004 recommended the changes to the methodology and impact fee schedule set forth in this Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 13, of the Meridian City Code is amended to read as follows: 10-7-13: PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEES: A.Incorporation Of Standards: This section addresses the development impact fees collected for park and recreation service improvements. The comprehensive plan, including the capital improvement plan developed pursuant to Idaho Code section 67- 8208 and incorporated into the comprehensive plan, as adopted by the city council together with the land use, acquisition and construction cost and service unit assumptions upon which said plan is based are hereby incorporated into this section by reference. B.Incorporation Of Maps: The maps contained within the comprehensive plan are hereby incorporated into this section by reference. Copies of said reaps may be obtained at the office of the city clerk or viewed and obtained at the administrative office of Meridian planning and zoning department. C.Park Impact Fee; Purpose And Implementation: All residential development is deemed to create an impact and therefore an increased demand for park and recreation services. As such the cost for new public park facilities should be borne by new users of park and recreation facilities to the extent new use requires new facilities. Therefore, any application for a building pennit enabling the construction on or after the effective date hereof, shall be subject to the imposition of park and recreation impact fees in the manner and amount set forth in this section. IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page I of 8 D.Payment Of Park Impact Fee: Prior to receiving a building penmit or commencing construction of any building for which park impact fees are to be paid pursuant to this chapter, whichever first occurs, the applicant therefor, must demonstrate that the appropriate impact fee has been paid to the fee administrator. The fee administrator and/or the public works department director shall have the authority to withhold a building permit or stop construction, as the case may be, until the appropriate impact fee has been collected. E.Methodology: The methodology adopted for the purpose of determining park and recreation impact fees shall be based upon the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive plan that new neighborhood and community park facilities are needed in Meridian to serve growth. Said assumptions, based upon the "existing and future facilities approach", set the existing standard for park needs as set forth: IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 2 of 8 Methodology to determine the park impact fee: Neighbefheed Existing Cost (October 1, 2002) 45 Deser-ipt-ien Rafk P-afk $70,000.00 Total service cost per acre 7" Additionally the comprehensive plan and. demographic data provided by the unde�,,eleped aefes 254 Eq,aals the tetal developed aer-es 17.26 48&908 Acres per thousand using Comp Plan W4.7 40,000 .004 standard of four acres per thousand population Tunes the total service cost to $95,()00. $95,000.00 $95,000.00 develop an acre Equals the park development cost per $40.98 $248.65 $380.00 person Times the number of persons per 2-.9-3 2,93 2.93 single family dwelling Equals the park development cost per $420:0W $28.55 $1,113.40 single family dwelling Times the number of persons per 2-.64 2-. P 2.67 multi- family dwelling Equals the park development cost per $109.42 $663.49 $_1_,014.60 multi-family dwelling Service Cost To Develop An Acre Existing Cost (October 1, 2002) Park land acquisition per acre $25,000.00 Park land improvements per acre $70,000.00 Total service cost per acre $95,000.00 Additionally the comprehensive plan and. demographic data provided by the official 2000 census assumes the following average numbers of people per dwelling unit: Single-family residential 2.93 persons per dwelling unit Multi -family residential 2.67 persons per dwelling unit IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 3 of 8 '*1. TH.:u 1N1Vf� ?OF'Ll� P� TOW $289.63 $848.62 $773.32 G F. Adjusted Development hnpact Fee: The Development Impact Fee shall be adjusted so that the impact fee imposed does not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred or to be incurred by the City of Meridian in the provision of system improvements to serve new development. The fee payer's proportionate share is the cost attributable to the new development„ after consideration of the factors set forth in Idaho Code section 67-8207. The adjustments p c are as follows and are included in the Summary of Impact Fees at section 10;,. 10-7-15 of this chapter: Homeowner's proportionate share = the portion of their tax dollars used to develop city parks. Meridian average residential value x Meridian levy rate x percentage of city actual tax dollars spent on park development — City's proportionate share = the tax dollars the city council will commit to develop parks. 14 G. Individual Project Assessment: An individual project assessment of park impact fees is permitted in situations where the fee payer can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence established through verified studies, data, and other relevant information submitted by the developer that the established impact fee is inappropriate. 1. Written application for individual. project assessment shall be made to the fee administrator at any time prior to receiving building permits or other necessary approvals. Late applications for an individual project assessment of park impact fees may be considered for a period of sixty (60) days after the receipt of the building permit only if the fee payer makes a showing that the facts supporting such application were not known or discoverable prior to receipt of the building permit and that undue hardship would result if said application is not considered. IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 4 of 8 2. The fee administrator shall render a written decision regarding the individual project assessment of park impact fees within thirty (30) days of the date a complete application for individual project assessment is submitted. The decision shall address the evidence submitted by the developer, and include an explanation of the calculation of the impact fee and other relevant factors. The decision of the fee administrator shall establish the park impact fee for the project in question for so long as there is no material change to the project as identified in the individual assessment application. The decision of the fee administrator shall be forwarded to the council for action. The council may accept, reject or revise the fee administrator's decision regarding individual project assessment and shall provide written findings of fact and conclusions of law. 3. Appeals of the fee administrator's determination of individual project assessment shall be made to the city council by the filing of an appeal with the city clerk no later than ten (10) days following the date of the decision of the fee administrator. I.H. Certification: Certification of the park impact fee schedule for a particular project may be applied for in the following manner: 1. Written application may be made to the fee administrator not later than sixty (60) days after preliminary plat approval by the city council. Late applications for certification of the park impact fee schedule will not be considered unless the fee payer makes a showing that the facts supporting such application were not known or discoverable until after the time had run and that undue hardship would result if said application is not considered. 2. The fee administrator shall provide the applicant, upon. request, with a written park impact fee schedule for the particular project within thirty (30) days of the date of application. The certified schedule provided by the fee administrator shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, shall include an explanation of the calculation of the impact fee, including an explanation of factors considered under Idaho Code section 67-8207, shall identify the system improvement(s) for which the impact fee is intended. to be used, and shall establish the park impact fee for the project in question so long as there is no material change to the project as identified in the individual assessment application.. 3. The certification of the park impact fee schedule may be appealed to the city council as provided in section 10-7-16 of this chapter. Section 2. That Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 15, of the Meridian City Code is amended to read as follows: IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 5 of 8 I0 -7-I5: SUMMARY OF IMPACT FEES: Development Impact Fee Schedule For Meridian Parks: Pursuant to the assumptions in the Meridian comprehensive plan and demographic data provided by Community _ Planning Association of Southwest Idaho, development mpaet fees for parks, including administrative surcharge and proportionate share adjustments, are set forth in the following table: Section 3. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (112) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon the 30"' day after its passage and approval, provided that in the interim it has been published. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 5_1~ day of ♦ , 2005. IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 6 of 8 lie Single -Family Multi -Family Description er $/Residence $/Residence Naber -hetes $ 40.98 $120.07 $109.42 Coffi f.,unit<, parks Park and Recreation 24 5 63-90 Development Cost $1113.40 $1014.60 CIP surcharge $20.00 $20.00 Metal Homeowner proportionate 289.63 868.62 441% -see 10-7- (39:38) 793.32 (39.38) share adjustment 13LF) $36.22 $36.22 Adjustment for City share of 2-0-0/, (161.85) (14 6. W9) development costs 30% $334.02 ($304.3$) Total Parks and Recreation 667.39 60�7.15 Impact Fee $763.16 $694.00 Section 3. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (112) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon the 30"' day after its passage and approval, provided that in the interim it has been published. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 5_1~ day of ♦ , 2005. IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 6 of 8 APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this -5day of zoos. APPROVED: �i�jCownc� �r�rde ATTE : 1 BEAL CITY CLERK IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 7 of 8 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 05- 11366 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7, OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY AND THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE SECTION 10-7-13, AND TO THE IMPACT FEE SUMMARY SECTION 10-7-15; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Title 10, Chapter 7 of the Meridian City Code to update the Parks and Recreation impact fee methodology and. fee schedule. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinange,,ahall become effective upon the 30`x' day 10'after its passage.ss„s City of Meridian Mayor and City Council SFAL By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Cler ”' First Reading: Adopted after first reading by suspension allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902: YES NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05- & S The undersigned, Ted W. Baird, Deputy City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 05 -- �� 9 g of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this _L�ffday of April, 2005. Baird Deputy City Attorney IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE METHODOLOGY AND FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS - Page 8 of 8 April 8, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT April 5, 2005 ITEM NO. 17 REQUEST Ordinance -- Solid Waste Collection Ordinance AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT. CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shalt become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See affached Ordinance Date: Phone: April 8, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT REQUEST Ordinance — Solid Waste Collection Ordinance April 5, 2005 ITEM NO. 17 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See attached Ordinance :,)(C)4el �,D a� Date: Phone: CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 06- 1110 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF TITLE 4, PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY, CHAPTER 1, SANITARY SERVICE SYSTEM, OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE, TO WIT: SECTIONS 4-1-6 THROUGH 4-1-23; AND ADDING SECTION 4-1-1 TITLE; SECTION 4-1-2 PURPOSE AND INTENT; SECTION 4-1-3 APPLICABILITY; SECTION 4-1-4 REGULATORY CONSISTENCY; AND SECTION 4-1-5 SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO: Section 1. That Title 4, Chapter 1, Sections 1-23, of the Meridian City Code is amended to read as follows: 4-1-1: TITLE: This Ordinance shall be known as the city of Meridian Solid Waste Ordinance and may be so cited. 4-1-2: PURPOSE AND INTENT: The pWpose_and intent of this Ordinance is to:. A. Establish a system for the storage, handling, collection and roeessin of solid waste with uniform requirements. B. Promote the health safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Meridian and enhance and preserve theAuality and value of the resources of the cijy of Meridian by the proer management of solid waste. C. Encourage and _improve the opportunity for recycling, D. EAu_itably distribute the costs of the solid waste collection and disposal system. 4-1-3: APPLICABILITY: This Ordinance shall qpply to all persons within the co orate limits of the city of Meridian, including those receiving solid waste services, eligible to, receive solid waste services and engagina, in the collection of solid waste. 4-1-4: REGULATORY CONSISTENCY: This Ordinance shall be construed to assure consistency with State and Federal laws, rules and regulations, and other provisions of the „Meridian City Code. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 1 of 21 4-1-5: SEVERABILITY: If any provision,clause sentence or ara a h of this Ordinance or the a lication thereof to any person, establishment or circumstance shall be held invalid, such inyalidi- shall not affect the other provisions or application of _ Ordinance g thewhich can be even affect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. 4-1-16: DEFINITIONS: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD): The Ada County highway district, a countywide highway district of Ada County, Idaho, duly formed and existing under chapter 14 of title 40, Idaho Code. BULKY WASTE: Waste materials intended for landfill disposal, except for major appliances; with sizes, weights or volumes greater than those allowed for trash containers, such as water tanks and furniture. Bulky waste does not include construction debris, dead animals, hazardous materials, or animal stable matter. CITY: The city of Meridian, Idaho. COMMERCIAL PREMISES: Business, industrial, and institutional premises and activities, as distinct from residential or multi -family premises. CUSTOMER: An occupant or owner of any premises, including household, apartment, business, institution or other establishment in the city for which solid waste service is, or has been, provided. FRANCHISEE: Any person authorized by the city of Meridian, or employed by the city of Meridian to collect, handle, transport and dispose of solid waste and/or recyclable materials and who has executed a franchise agreement with the city of Meridian. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR WASTES: Any chemical, compound, mixture, substance or article which is designated by the United States environmental protection agency or appropriate agency of the state to be a "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substance" as those terms are defined by federal or state law. INSPECTOR: The authorized employee or employees of the city of Meridian or some individual designated by the city council as having the duty of enforcement of this chapter. MULTI -FAMILY PREMISES: Multi -family structures with two (2) or more dwelling units, condominium complexes of all sizes, mobile home parks or manufactured housing communities, clusters of detached homes and duplexes where owners choose centralized solid waste collection in containers provided by the franchisee rather than individual solid waste can service. Multi -family does not include dwelling hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, or other congregate housing, care, or institutional facilities. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 2 of 21 OCCUPANT: The person in possession, charge or in control of any unit in a multi -family premises, residential premises, commercial premises or other premises where solid waste is created or accumulated. OVERLOADING: Exceeding the container weight capacity or volume allowance, allowing objects to protrude outside of the container, or stacking objects or waste against outside the container. OWNER: The person owning the real property where solid waste is created or accumulated. PERSON: Any person, firm, partnership, association, institution, limited liability company, corporation, trust and/or any other legal entity whether for profit or nonprofit, public or private, and in the plural as well as singular. PROHIBITED WASTE: Includes any wastes that have any of the following general characteristics: A. Extreme temperature; B. Harmful vapors; C. The presence of corrosive, flammable, explosive or toxic chemicals; D. Any materials with physical or other properties which render collection operations hazardous; or E. Any materials which create a risk to the environment or public health and safety. In addition to wastes with the general characteristics described above, prohibited wastes include: A. Liquid wastes, both bulk and contained; B. Tires; C. Any material regulated by the state of Idaho or the United States environmental protection agency (40 CFR 260-268) as hazardous waste; D. Any equipment or machines containing refrigerants; E. Infectious wastes generated from business sources such as hospitals, clinics, medical, surgical, dental, nursing homes, veterinarian offices, and laboratories. Generators of infectious waste are required to sterilize, package, or otherwise process the infectious waste so that it may be collected without hazard to collection personnel and the general public; and Solid Waste ordinance - Page 3 of 21 F. Dead animal remains in an amount exceeding twenty five (25) pounds, excluding animal carcasses if broken down into less than 25 pound portions and placed into sturdy plastic solid -waste -bags and into a lidded, airtight and watertight container. PUTRESCIBLE WASTE: Wastes that can decay and stink or become putrid. RECYCLABLE MATERIALS: Products, including paper, cardboard, metal, or any other substance capable of being reprocessed into consumer materials, which have served the purpose for which they were originally manufactured or produced and have passed through their end usage as consumer items, and which have been discarded or placed for collection by their owner. RESIDENTIAL PREMISES: A separate dwelling or residential unit in the city occupied by a person or group of persons which may be in a single-family residence, mobile home, manufactured home, condominium, duplex or multiplex where solid waste is placed and collected in solid waste containers and/or recyclable materials are placed and collected in recycling containers located at the curb or alley. Each separate dwelling unit shall be considered a separate residence for solid waste service and billing purposes. SOLID WASTE: All materials discarded for disposal, putrescible and nonputrescible solid and semisolid waste material including solid waste, rubbish, demolition and construction wastes, industrial wastes, vegetable solid and semisolid wastes, dead animal remains in amounts not to exceed twenty five (25) pounds, reusable or recyclable material, bulky goods, and other discarded solid and semisolid wastes. VECTOR: An organism that can transmit disease. (Ord. 889, 9-5-2000) 4-1-27: RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY: The chief of police of the city and such other persons as may be appointed by the mayor and council, shall be responsible for the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter and other duties as the city council may prescribe, and there shall be designated as a member of the police department, a sanitary inspector, who shall enforce the same under the supervision of the chief of police. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-148: COMPULSORY USE REQUIRED: A. In order to maintain the public health, safety, and aesthetics of the city, all owners and/or occupants are required to pay for, and are provided, solid waste collection services. B. Provided, further, that in areas in the city where the collection of solid waste on the schedules hereinafter set forth would be impracticable, the city council may issue a special permit altering the time and extent of collection. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 4 of 21 C. Beginning October 2, 2000, each residential customer shall be supplied with a bin for collection of recyclable materials. Eaeh weekWhen full, on the regularly scheduled solid waste collection day, the customer shall sort the recyclables in the bin and place the bin at curbside, and the franchise holder will collect the recyclable materials placed in the bins. The fee for such recycling shall be set by resolution of the city council and shall be included in each customer's monthly solid waste collection billing as an additional fee. (Ord. 889, 9-5-2000) 4-1-49: SOLID WASTE COLLECTION: There is hereby established a system of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of collecting, transporting, hauling, or conveying any solid waste over the streets or alleys of Meridian, or to dump or dispose of the same, unless and until such person has a franchise, license, or contract as an authorized representative of the city. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1--510: PROHIBITIONS: A. Accumulation of Solid Waste: 1. It is a violation of this chapter for any person to permit or to suffer to accumulate in or about any yard, lot, place or premises, or upon any street, alley or sidewalk adjacent to such lot, yard, place or premises owned or occupied by such person, any solid waste so as to cause such yard, lot, premises, or the street, alley or sidewalk adjacent thereto, to be or remain in such condition as to cause or create a nuisance or offensive odor or atmosphere or vector harborage, or thereby to be or to become, or cause or create, a public nuisance, within the limits of the city. Any such unauthorized accumulation or collection is declared a nuisance and prohibited. 2. Waste resulting from construction activities may be collected within an active site. The waste shall be managed and maintained in such a manner that it will not be blown, washed or carried to adjacent properties. All wastes must be removed and disposed properly from the site prior to the end of the construction project. 3, Compost piles may be maintained for fertilization purposes and matter used for fertilization purposes only may be transported, kept and used, provided, that the same shall not be maintained so as to cause a condition of odor and/or site visibility and/or other conditions relative to insects or disease that affect neighboring properties, cause harmful vapors or constitute a risk to the environment or public health and safety. B. Burning and Dumping: It is a violation of this chapter for any person to burn, incinerate, bury, dump, or in any other manner dispose of solid waste within the limits of Meridian. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 5 of 21 C. Overloading Containers: It is a violation of this chapter for any customer to load a waste container beyond its volume or weight capacity. This prohibition includes loading containers in a manner which is unstable or likely to cause damage, create a litter condition, or impact the public health or safety. The maximum permissible container weights, meaning gross weight of a loaded container, are: Residential bags 35 pounds Residential/commercial containers 65 pounds Residential/commercial toters 150 pounds Front Load Containers Rear Load Containers 2 cubic yards: 1,01 400 pounds 2,400 pends 3 cubic yards: 32,000 pounds 2,400 pounds 4 eubi. ds4,000 5,000 pounds 6 cubic yards: -54,000 pounds 2,400 pounds 8 cubic yards: 5,000 pounds 2,400 pounds 2 chis 20,000 17,000 pounds 0 yards 17,000 pounds 3 ems 20,000 pound& 0 yards 3 cubie 20,000 pounds -5 yard-&. 4 eubie 20,000 0 yards: Roll Off Containers 6 cubic yards: 5,000 pounds 8 cubic ,yards 5,000 pounds 10 cubic yards 5,000 pounds 20 cubic yards 17,000op unds 30 cubic yards: 17,000 pounds 35 cubic yards: 17,000 pounds 40 cubic yards: 17,000 pounds Customers shall be responsible for damages, costs, expenses, fines or penalties, including tickets issued to franchisee for overweight vehicles, which arise out of Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 6 of 21 customer failure to limit weights, in a container greater than or equal to twenty (20) cubic yards. D. Prohibited Wastes: 1. Solid waste collection service is intended to collect normal commercial, industrial, residential, and multi -family premises wastes. It is a violation of this Chapter for any person to deposit or relinquish for collection or disposal any prohibited wastes identified herein. Customers are encouraged to contact the franchisee with questions regarding specific wastes. 2. Customers who are a source of prohibited wastes shall make appropriate arrangements to collect and dispose of the waste. E. Taking of Solid Waste or Recyclables: 1. All trash and recyclable material placed for collection shall be owned by and be the responsibility of the customer until the time of collection. At the time of collection, all trash and recyclable material become the property of the franchisee. 2. It is a violation of this Chapter for any person to take, examine, uncover, snoop in, separate, gather, collect or salvage materials deposited in solid waste containers except with the express permission of the generator of the solid waste. F. Theft of Collection Services: 1. It is a violation of this Chapter for any person, except for the owner or occupant, to place or deposit any materials in or around a solid waste receptacle provided for the use of a specific business or premises, or in or around the can or container at a residence. 2. It is a violation of this Chapter for any person to place solid waste at a premises within the City limits that is not generated at the commercial, residential, or multi- family premises. G. Disposal Of Waste: It is a violation of this Chapter for any person to throw, discard or deposit any solid waste in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk or vacant ground, or in or upon any canal, irrigation ditch, drainage ditch or other watercourse. (Ord. 851, 12- 7-1999) Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 7 of 21 4-1-611: NUISANCE DECLARED: Failure of an owner or occupant of any commercial, residential, or multi -family premises to receive regularly scheduled adequate solid waste collection service is herein declared a public nuisance by the City. The City shall have the authority to order the abatement of such nuisance at the expense of the owner or occupant of the premises. This shall not limit the right of the City or the owner to seek recovery against other responsible persons. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-712: STORAGE OF SCRAP TIRES: Commercial business entities which store scrap tires for the purpose of salvage or reuse shall: A. Screen the tires from public view; B. Store the tires in such a manner that vectors and pest breeding or habitat areas will be avoided; C. Store or make available no more than fifty (50) scrap tires at any given time; D. Remove all scrap tires a minimum of once per month. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-813: SPECIAL HANDLING: Solid waste consisting only of cardboard, or wooden boxes, brush, and cuttings from trees, lawns, shrubs, and gardens, may be kept separately without depositing in solid waste containers, providing, that bulk materials, such as leaves, weeds and cuttings shall be in a can, box, sack, or receptacle for ease of loading and such material as brush and limbs shall be tied in bundles not to exceed four feet (4') in length. Nothing contained in this Section shall be construed so as to permit any violation of any Iaws or any rules or regulations of the City's life safety and/or other uniform codes. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-914: COLLECTION FREQUENCY: Franchisee shall collect solid waste from each customer at least once each week, or as provided by the rules and regulations of the Council as allowed in Section 4-1-10 of this Chapter. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 8 of 21 4-1-4-G15: RULES AND REGULATIONS; BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: The City Council, is hereby granted the authority to adopt rules and regulations pertaining to the sanitary service system, including, but not limited to, the setting of fees and rates and the City Council is hereby authorized to appoint a Board of Adjustment consisting of the sanitary service system commissioners, and the sanitary service system contractor and the City Treasurer; the Board of Adjustment shall have the duty to propose rules and regulations and in certain situations adjust rates and fees as necessary. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-4-4-16: COLLECTION: A. Commercial Service: Commercial solid waste service is associated with commercial premises, including governmental agencies, schools, and temporary construction activities. Commercial solid waste service includes waste collection/removaI and recycling collection. Service will commence on a daily basis, except Sunday, at five o'clock (5:00) A.M. Additionally, public and private schools, even though they are often located in residential areas, will be serviced between five o'clock (5:00) A.M. and seven. o'clock (7:00) A.M. for safety reasons. 1. Types Of Service: The following commercial solid waste services are provided by the solid waste franchisee: a. Regular Service: Franchisee shall provide containers 95 gallons or larger) and collect waste at least once weekly. Franchisee shall provide the customer with a choice of weekly thirty two (32) gallon container service (containers provided by customer) when: (1) The customer can reasonably be serviced by a regular weekly residential or commercial waste service route; and (2) The customer does not regularly generate more than six (6) 32 -gallon size containers of solid waste per week. b. On -Call Service: Franchisee shall provide container and collect waste within the next working day of a customer request. For customers choosing to use compactor containers, the customer shall provide the compactor and the franchisee shall collect waste within the next working day of a customer request unless the customer authorizes regularly scheduled collection. c. Temporary Service: Franchisee shall provide container and collection services to temporary accounts for construction and demolition projects or other short-term waste generation projects. Temporary service is provided for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) days. Use of a temporary container does not displace regular solid waste service for the premises. Regular solid waste generated by the premises is not permitted in a temporary container. Temporary service for construction and Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 9 of 21 demolition wastes will be limited to roll -off containers; except where construction and demolition trash service can only be provided with a three (3) yard container due to inadequate space or other site location restrictions. 2. Commercial Premises Commercial Containers: Commercial premises solid waste service is provided with large capacity containers, which include two (2) to eight (8) cubic yard dumpsters, front or rear loaded, and twenty (20) to forty (40) cubic yard roll -off containers. Such containers are supplied by the solid waste franchisee and are placed at a location specified by the customer, subject to approval by the franchisee. Commercial premises solid waste service also includes compactor/container service. Customers provide the compactor and container for this type of service. Containers for compactor service range from two (2) to forty (40) cubic yard capacity, subject to approval by the franchisee for compatibility with collection vehicles. 3. Container/Compactor Sites: a. Location Requirements: (1) Permanent Containers: For any area under a customer's ownership or control, including driveways and/or any other access route, as well as the container location, customers shall have a sufficient foundation to support the collection vehicle weight. Vehicle weights vary, but range between twenty (20) and thirty (30) tons. Customers will be required to indemnify the Ci1y of Meridian and the Franchisee for road surface damage prior to service being rovided. (2) Temporary Container Requirements: Temporary containers are placed at the customer's direction, if franchisee approves the location for space requirements and safety. Containers shall not be placed in a street without prior approval and permit from the Ada County Highway District (ACHD). Nor shall they obstruct the public right of way or pedestrian traffic. (3) Compactor Containers: Compactor customers must contact the franchisee in advance to ensure that the compaction unit is compatible with collection vehicles and equipment and to ensure the location allows proper access for collection. Minimum height and width clearances will vary depending upon the compaction equipment. b. Appearance: All commercial property owners shall maintain, clean, and largely shield from view all commercial solid waste collection equipment from public streets by walls, fences, earthen berms, or evergreen landscaping forming an opaque, attractive sight barrier. All such barriers shall comply with all applicable City ordinances, requirements and/or limitations, including location and height. No commercial collection location shall be on a public right of way unless an appropriate variance is granted by the ACRD. No commercial collection location Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 10 of 21 shall block pedestrian traffic. Existing commercial solid waste collection sites shall be largely shielded from view within three (3) years of the effective date hereof. c. Cleanliness: Customers shall keep the container location, and the containers, in a sanitary condition. The outside of the container shall be kept clean and free from accumulating grease, decomposing materials, and litter. Loose solid waste must be deposited in containers for collection. Failure to comply with this subsection is herein declared a public nuisance. Franchisee workers do not normally clean up the premises. However, cleanup services can be provided at an additional service charge. Where determined necessary to protect the health or safety of the public and environment, the City may order a customer to clean the area. Franchisee shall clean up any spillage that occurs during collection services. Customers shall keel) the interior of the container in a„sanitary condition. d. Contents: Contents of a waste container must be able to fall freely from the container when emptied. Container lids must be in a completely closed position and swing freely open when the container is emptied. Containers must be packed to allow easy emptying of contents when inverted. e. Frequency Of Collection: The choice of container size and frequency of service is at the customer's option, except that all regular service customers, and customers generating wet or putrescible wastes, shall be collected no less than once per week. Temporary and on-call services, not generating wet or putrescible wastes, must receive at least monthly service, unless the City determines another minimum service interval is appropriate, considering protection of the environment and public health and safety. B. Residential Premises Service: Residential premises solid waste service is provided to residents of Meridian by a franchisee. This service is provided to allow residential premises customers to meet solid waste disposal requirements of the City. Solid waste intended for disposal shall be placed in containers supplied by the customer or toter carts available from the franchisee at an additional cost. 1. Mandatory Payment For Services: In order to maintain the public health, safety, and aesthetics of the City, all owners and/or occupants are required to pay for, and are provided, solid waste collection services. 2. Types Of Service: The following residential solid waste services shall be provided by the solid waste franchisee: a. Regular Service: Customer shall provide the solid waste container(s) and franchisee shall collect the waste on a weekly basis. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 11 of 21 b. Carryout Service: At customer request, franchisee shall enter customer's property, but not enclosed structures, to collect solid waste containers and recycling bins. Franchisee may require the customer to execute a "save and hold harmless agreement" prior to receiving this service. c. ADA (Americans With Disabilities Act) Service: The franchisee shall provide carryout service for solid waste and recyclable materials at no extra charge to those who have a "disability" as hereinafter defined and who have no one else in the household that can take the solid waste container(s) to the curb/alley. However, the regular residential solid waste collection fee shall be charged. In order to qualify for the lower rate for carryout service, individuals must have a written certification from a licensed physician verifying that the applicant's impairment qualifies as a disability and prevents them from utilizing curbside service. In addition the applicant must certify that there is no other person in the individual's household that can carry the solid waste container(s) to the curb/alley. "Disability", for this purpose, is defined as a physical or mental impairment, whether permanent or temporary, that limits caring for oneself, performing manual tasks of walking, or lifting so as to place a solid waste container at the curbside. Application for the disability discount are available from the utility billings department at City Hall. d. Appliances: Franchisee shall collect major appliances upon resident request and shall deliver the appliance to a recycling facility. Customers must contact franchisee for collection services. Franchisee is responsible for ensuring that refrigerants and compressor oils contained in the appliance, if any, are recycled according to applicable regulations. Appliance collection is offered once weekly. e. Bulky Wastes: Franchisee shall collect bulky wastes within twenty four (24) hours of customer request on normal business days or on the normal solid waste collection day. Franchisee is not required to enter premises to collect bulky wastes. Customer shall convey bulky wastes to the curbside for collection. f. Christmas Trees: Following Christmas each year, on dates specified by the City, franchisee shall provide separate collection for Christmas trees prepared for recycling. 3. Residential Premises Service Containers: a. It shall be the duty of every owner or occupant of any residential premises to at all times keep or cause to be kept portable aboveground containers consisting of metal or other approved type of container for the deposit therein of solid waste and except as otherwise provided, to deposit or cause to be deposited all solid waste therein. All solid waste shall, before deposit in such container, or tightly closed 1.5 Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 12 of 2I mil plastic bags, be free of any liquids. All such containers shall be watertight, not easily corrodible, rodent and flyproof, and shall be equipped with handles and a close fitting lid. Such containers shall not be less than twenty (20) gallons capacity or more than thirty two (32) gallons capacity, and limited to sixty five (65) pounds in weight. The containers shall not be less than twenty eight (28) gauge metal or the equivalent, and be hot -dipped after fabrication to ensure nonieaking containers or a can that is guaranteed by the manufacturer, and also labeled, to be leakproof regardless of manufacturing processes. b. Container lids must be in a completely closed position and open freely to allow the container to be emptied. Containers must be packed to allow easy emptying of contents when inverted,—. Tthe contents must fall freely from the container when emptied. Containers must have sturdy handles and shall be replaced by the customer when the containers are no longer functional or when determined by the franchisee to be unsafe for further use. Whenever solid waste is placed therein or taken from such lid shall be replaced by the person placing or taking from such solid waste. Such containers shall be kept in sanitary condition, with the inside and outside thereof washed at such times as to keep the same free and clean of all accumulating grease and decomposing material and so that no odor nuisance shall exist. All solid waste containers shall be kept in a place accessible to the collector provided that in the case of isolated dwellings or places of business or where reasonable access cannot be had by a truck, the containers may be kept in such places as may be agreed by the owner and collector, or at such place as may be designated by the inspector; provided further, that whereas there is no alley entrance, such containers shall be placed on the street curb on collection day. c. Tree trimmings and similar solid waste should be tied in bundles not to exceed four feet (4') in length and two feet (2') in diameter. d. Ninety (90) to ninety five (95) gallon toter carts may be available from the franchisee for a monthly rental fee. Carts may be used in conjunction with additional customer furnished containers and do not limit the amount of waste that can be placed at the curbside. The maximum weight limit of a toter cart is one hundred fifty (15 0) pounds. 4. Location: a. Residential premises solid waste shall be placed as close to the curb as possible, or in alleys if the property has alley access. In no case shall a container be more than 4 feet from the curb for collection. The solid waste containers shall be clear of pedestrian and vehicular traffic at all times. Solid waste containers shall be clearly visible and accessible to the waste collection personnel and free from obstructions including, but not limited to, trees, shrubbery, fences, vehicles, and walls. Franchisee shall not be required to pass through any doors or gates, cross flower beds or lawns, go through hedges, or place themselves in any situation which could jeopardize their health or safety. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 13 of 21 b. The franchisee shall not be required to remove solid waste from in -ground or sunken locations. Any customer who has such a location shall be responsible for placement of the container, with lid, aboveground. c. The franchisee shall only service customers on public rights-of-way unless authorized to the contrM by the owner of a non-public right-of-way. Authorization shall include a road damage waiver for the City and the Franchisee. ed.. The franchisee shall return all emptied containers to the approximate location where the customer placed them. The franchisee shall close any can or container as securely as possible to prevent the lid from blowing away, or prevent moisture from entering the can or container. de. For carryout service, customers shall store prepared containers in unlocked areas clearly visible to the franchisee workers from the street or alley from which normal collections are made. If the yard is locked or there is an animal which appears unfriendly, the customer shall place the can or container outside the fence or animal's domain. 5. Cleanliness: Customers shall keep containers in a sanitary condition with the outside thereof clean and free from accumulating grease, decomposing material and litter. Loose solid waste must be deposited in containers for collection. Franchisee workers shall make a reasonable effort to pick up all material blown or littered during the course of collection. However, they do not normally clean up messes caused by improper waste set out. In the case of a recurring problem, the franchisee may leave the resident a notice describing the problem. 6. Containers Set -Out And Bring -In: Residential premises solid waste shall be placed at the curb for collection no later than seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. on the regularly scheduled day, but no sooner than the evening prior to collection. Residential solid waste customers using alley collection locations shall ensure containers are placed in an accessible location in the alleyway by seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. on the regularly scheduled collection day. Alleyway customers must maintain the solid waste collection area to ensure no vectors, rodents, or animals are attracted to the solid waste containers and to ensure a nuisance is not created or maintained. Residents who put their solid waste out after the collection truck has serviced their area or have had the solid waste containers blocked or hidden from view by an object such as a vehicle, shall be responsible for contacting the franchisee for a special collection. If the containers are placed after the area has been serviced, the franchisee may charge a special "callback" rate established by the City; or the customer may store the solid waste until the next regularly scheduled day for collection. Residents who have curbside service must relocate their empty containers back to a location within five feet (5) of their home within twenty four (24) hours of being serviced. It is a violation of this Chapter if a residential premises customer who places residential/commercial can or toter at curb for collection does not remove the same from the curb within twenty four (24) hours of the day of collection.. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 14 of 21 7. Used Motor Oil: Used motor oil must be placed in leakproof, preferably see- through, unbreakable, plastic containers of not more than two (2) gallons with a screw on lid. Containers will be clearly marked by the resident as "OIL". No other fluids are to be included. Limited to two (2) gallons per week. Used motor oil shall be placed near, but not in, the recycling bin or trash container for collection. If the used oil container is to be returned to the customer it must be marked, in legible letters "SAVE". S. Appliances: Customer must drain all moisture and water and remove all solid waste and food products from refrigerators, freezers or other appliances prior to collection by franchisee. Appliances must be readily available for collection by franchisee workers. Franchisee shall not be required to enter any building or structure to remove the appliance or other item. 9. Bulky Waste: Franchisee shall provide special collection service for bulky waste items upon request by the customer. Bulky wastes must be readily available for collection by franchisee workers. Franchisee shall not be required to enter any building or structure to remove the appliance. 10. Christmas Trees: Customers participating in the annual Christmas tree recycling program must remove all ornaments, lights, tinsel, and tree stands from the tree prior to placing it at the curb or alley for collection. Branches and tree trimmings may also be set out for collection with Christmas trees. Trees and branches should be cut to four feet (4') or less and bundled as needed. 11. Animal Feces: All animal feces must be securely contained in a leakpEg2f bag or container before being placed in a can or bag for routine collection. Waste receptacles with unbuged feces will not be collected. 4412. Franchisee/Licensee Responsibilities: When the franchisee/licensee encounters improperly prepared solid waste, such as overweight containers, waste which is too tightly packed to fall from the can, Christmas trees with stands or ornaments, etc., the franchisee shall collect any properly prepared waste and leave the improperly prepared material. The date and service address shall be noted on the notice. The franchisee shall keep a copy of this information and supply a copy to the City upon request. 4-213. Frequency of Collection: All residents of the City shall be provided solid waste collection service once per week on a day determined by the franchisee in consultation with the City Council. 4-314. Missed Collection: Customers should contact the franchisee to report any missed collection. Franchisee shall promptly respond to reports of missed collections. A complaint of a missed collection received by the franchisee from a residential customer shall be resolved within one business day of the customer's report. The one Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 15 of 21 business day deadline does not apply if the missed collection occurred due to late or improper set out by the customer. Each customer failure must be documented by the franchisee through verifiable means such as logbook, and in the case of improper set out, by a copy of the customer notice. If the complaint is a documented customer responsibility, the customer shall be offered the option of having a special collection at the "callback" rate established by the City, or storing the solid waste until the next regular collection day. C. Multi -Family Premises Service: Multi -family premises solid waste service is provided to premises with multi -unit dwellings of more than one residence on a single site. Multi -family premises include multiplex dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and manufactured home parks where the solid waste is billed under a master billing. Multi -family does not include dwelling hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, or other congregate housing, care, or institutional facilities. Multiple -family dwellings of four (4) or fewer units may use either can service or central solid waste collection service. Multiple -family dwellings of five (5) or more units shall use central solid waste collection services. Multi -family premises solid waste service is provided with large capacity containers, which include two (2) to eight (8) cubic yard dumpsters, front or rear loaded, and twenty (20) to forty (40) yard roll -off containers. Such containers are supplied by the solid waste franchisee and are placed at locations specified by the customer and acceptable to the franchisee. Multi -family premises solid waste service can also include compactor container service. Customers desiring compactor service provide the compactor for this type of service. Containers for compactor service range from two (2) to forty (40) cubic yard capacity, subject to approval by the franchisee for compatibility with the collection vehicles. 1. Mandatory Service: In order to maintain the public health, safety, and aesthetics of the City, all multi -family premises are required to pay for, and are provided, solid waste collection services. 2. Types Of Service: The franchisee shall provide the following multi -family premises solid waste services: a. Regular Service: Franchisee shall provide containers and collect waste at least once weekly. If the customer chooses to use a compactor, the customer shall provide the compactor and the franchisee shall collect the solid waste at least once each week. b. Temporary Service: Franchisee shall provide container and collection services to temporary accounts for construction and demolition projects or other short-term waste generation projects. Temporary service is provided for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) days. Use of a temporary container does not displace regular Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 16 of 21 solid waste service for the premises. Regular solid waste generated by the premises is not permitted in a temporary container. c. Appliances: Franchisee shall collect major appliances and shall deliver the appliances to a recycling facility. Customers must contact franchisee for collection services. Franchisee shall be responsible for ensuring that refrigerants and compressor oils contained in the appliance, if any, are recycled according to applicable regulations. Franchisee shall not be required to enter any building or structure in order to remove any appliance. Appliance collection is offered weekly. 3. Solid Waste Containers: The franchisee shall provide a container of adequate size to accommodate the type of service requested by the customer. Customer -owned compactors can vary in size and are subject to approval by the franchisee for vehicle compatibility. 4. Container/Compactor Sites: a. Location Requirements: For any area under a customer's ownership or control, including driveways or any other access route, as well as the container location, customers shall have a sufficient foundation to support the collection vehicle weight. Vehicle weights vary, but range between twenty (20) and thirty (30) tons. Temporary containers are placed at the customer's direction, if franchisee personnel approve the location for space requirements and safety. Containers shall not be placed in a street without prior approval and permit from the Ada County Highway District. Containers shall not obstruct the public right of way or pedestrian traffic without prior approval. Compactor customers must contact the franchisee in advance to ensure that the compaction unit is compatible with collection vehicles and equipment and to ensure the location allows proper access for collection. Minimum height and width clearances will vary depending upon the compaction equipment. 5. Appearance: Every multi -family premises solid waste collection location shall be maintained properly, cleaned, and largely shielded from view from public streets by walls, fences, earthen berms, or evergreen landscaping forming an opaque, attractive sight barrier. No collection location shall be on a public right of way unless an appropriate variance is granted by ACRD. No collection location shall block pedestrian traffic. 6. Cleanliness: Customers shall keep the container location, and the containers, in a sanitary condition. The outside of the container shall be kept clean and free from accumulating grease, decomposing materials, and litter. Loose solid waste must be deposited in containers for collection. Franchisee workers do not normally clean up Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 1.7 of 21 the premises. However, cleanup services can be provided at an additional service charge. 7. Contents: Contents of a waste container must fall freely from the container when emptied. Container lids must be in a completely closed position and swing freely open when the container is emptied. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-17: SITE PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL OR MULTI -FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION OR REMODELS: A. Customers are responsible for obtaining plan approval from the City for all proposed solid waste storage and collection areas. This requirement shall apply whenever new construction or remodeling occurs on commercial or multi -family premises. Site plan approval shall be based on the following requirements: 1. All commercial containers must be placed on a firm, level surface pad of concrete or asphalt at least three inches (3") thick. Customers shall accept the risk that asphalt surfaces may sink or become uneven or unserviceable; 2. The surface pad must be at least twelve feet (12') wide by ten feet (10') deep for solid waste collection, and seventeen feet (17) wide by ten feet (10') deep if other waste activities are occurring (i.e., grease collection, recycling); 3. Gates must be constructed to rest in an open position to avoid swinging shut during pickup; 4. The site shall provide adequate turning space for the waste collection vehicle. Adequate turning space shall mean a minimum turning radius of forty five feet (45'); 5. The site shall provide adequate space to allow the collection vehicle to back up a distance of at least fifty feet (50'); and 6. The site shall provide at least fourteen feet (14') vertical clearance and twelve feet (12') width drive clearance. Additionally, front load containers must have at least twenty feet (20') vertical clearance at the container. Customers are required to remove any vertical height obstacles. B. Site plan submissions shall include an accurate plan of the entire area for which service is to be provided. The plan shall be drawn accurately, at a scale adequate to show clearly all the following data: 1. Lot lines; 2. Existing and planned buildings; 3. Proposed collection location and sight shielding; Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 18 of 21 4. All existing and planned sidewalks, curb cuts, drives, parking spaces, landscaping, freestanding signs, posts, poles (i.e., streetlight, telephone, and electric poles), and other structures that may affect solid waste collection; 5. The location of all public rights of way, fire hydrants, sidewalks, and public transportation stops located on the premises and/or adjacent to the premises; and 6. Adjacent structures, including distances to nearest residential areas. (Ord. 851, 12- 7-1999) 4-1-4-318: COLLECTION FEES: Fees and rates for the collection of solid waste shall be set by rules and regulations of the City Council. The City utility billing department may require a deposit as a condition of initiating, continuing, or restoring temporary or on-call service. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-14419: METHOD OF COLLECTION: Fees shall be billed to and paid by the owner of the premises that is served by the sanitary service system. Fees shall be carried on the water bill, and the same shall be paid with the water bill, and the Water Department is authorized to discontinue service to the owner's premises if the utility bill is not paid. Said sanitary service system fees that become delinquent shall be treated the same as water delinquent fees and shall be subject to the same penalties, including the same shall become a lien on the premises and shall be collected with the taxes. Further, any owner leaving a delinquency at one location shall not be entitled to service at a new location until all delinquencies in sanitary service system fees are paid. In case of nonpayment, or delinquency in payment, of accounts that do not have associated water system charges the solid waste service may be suspended until such time as all charges and fees (including late fees and penalties) are currently paid. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-4-520: DISPOSITION OF FEES: The proceeds from the collection of fees and charges herein provided shall be placed in a special fund to be known as the "solid waste collection account", and all expenses of the City in the operation of the sanitary collection system shall be paid out of such fund and any surplus remaining therein at the end of each fiscal year may be transferred by the Council to the General Fund. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-4-621: INSPECTION; RIGHT OF ENTRY: Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 19 of 21 The Chief of Police, or such person as may be designated as the Sanitary Inspector, or any other person concerned with the enforcement of laws shall have the right of ingress or egress to any premises for the purpose of inspecting all places and containers where solid waste is accumulated or kept. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-22: FRANCHISES; LICENSING; CONTRACTING; BOND: A. The Mayor and Council have the sole authority to select and approve all persons who shall enter into a franchise or license agreement; contract to perform all services pertaining to sanitary collection and disposal under the provisions of this Chapter; to establish reasonable fees for licenses; and may establish reasonable rules and regulations governing the conduct and operation of such licensee or contractor. The Council may require of any such franchisee, licensee, or contractor a bond in a reasonable amount, and the condition of which shall be the satisfactory performance of the contract. B. Any person using three (3) or more vehicles or if any one vehicle is a single or combination vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of twenty six thousand one (26,001) or more that provides solid waste collection services within the Meridian City limits must execute a solid waste collection franchise agreement with the City. Collection of solid waste within the Meridian City limits without a valid franchise or license agreement is a violation of this Chapter subject to the penalties contained in Section 4-1-18 of this Chapter. C. Any person using fewer than three (3) vehicles and the gross vehicle weight rating (GV)VR) of each vehicle is Iess than twenty six thousand one (26,001) in a single or combination vehicle, that is engaged in the collection and hauling of recyclable materials within. the Meridian City limits must execute a recyclable materials collection license agreement with the City. Collection of recyclable materials within the Meridian City limits without a valid license agreement is a violation of this Chapter, subject to the penalties contained in Section 4-1-18 of this Chapter. D. The actual producers of the solid waste and/or recyclable materials, or owners and occupants of the premises upon which such waste is generated, may collect, convey and dispose of such waste and/or materials, provided that their actions comply with all other provisions of this Chapter. E. A civic, community, benevolent, or charitable nonprofit organization that collects, transports and markets source -separated materials for recycling only for the purpose of raising funds for that organization shall not be required to obtain a license or franchise from the City. F. Any person engaged in the occupation of a demolition or construction contractor or Iandscaper who produces incidental volumes of solid waste as a result of such work may collect, convey, and dispose of such waste, provided that their actions comply Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 20 of 21 with all other provisions of this Chapter and the conveyance of such waste occurs in vehicles that are owned by the contractor. (Ord. 851, 12-7-1999) 4-1-4-923: PENALTY: The violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or the rules and regulations adopted hereunder shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 1-4-1 of this Code. (Ord. 370, 5-19-1980; amd. 1999 Code) Section 2. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of the Council, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 1'-,6'day of Afmt '2005. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of n 1 , 2005. MAYOR ATTEST: UAL CITY CLERK spit. Solid Waste Ordinance - Page 21 of 21 Aptll 1, 2005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 5, 2005 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 24 REQUEST Wafter, Sewer Trash Delinquencies AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY EIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS 4r-1- v --j Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. i PIN DIVA, APR - 5 2005 DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFFof Meridian Schedule f®r APRIL 6, 2005 CqVlelk office Cycle 2 MAYOR: Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-21, delinquent water users shall have the right to request a pre termination hearing prior to water service being disconnected. No water users having requested such pre- termination hearing for April 5, 2005, water service for the attached turn-off list will be terminated on April 6, 2005. The total amount of the turn-off list is $21,074.91. CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:36pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No () = {<} 88000000l Customer.Bill Cycle = 2 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02120/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 13.13.8426,2 A.M. THOMPSON MOONLAKE Tl 6217 57.03 5.14 03/25/2005 70.00- 17.86.0036.2 AAGAARD, JANICE 33.31 27.77 5.54 - 02/15/2005 50.00- 18.42,2992.4 ABLEMAN, DOUG & ANGELA 69.24 36.50 32.74 02/28/2005 109.54- 16.32.1110.2 ACACIA EQUITIES 114.44 70.34 44.10 - 03/01/2005 50.00- 3.15.1338.1 ACC HOMES 42.80 37.36 5.44 - 01/04/2005 20.0o- 15,22.1330.2 ACTION HOME BUYERS LLC 81.88 24,01 57.87 - 02117/2005 197.93- 17,34.1108.3 ADAMS, CYNTHIA 88.38 77.78 10.60 - 03/02/2005 100.00- 15.21-3146.3 AGUERO, JEREMY 85,73 31,53 25.22 28.98 01/1012005 41,38- 15.21.2800.2 AINGER, DAVE 35.40 17.70 17.70 - - 9.09.9020.2 ALLEN, NANCY & RUSSELL 92.52 53.47 39.05 - 02/25/2005 39.05- 15.21.0082.1 ALLEN, SCOTT 48.52 - 10.82 37.70 01/24/2005 77.00- 16.31-3422.1 ALLEN, SEDENA 59.22 24.01 27.77 7.44 - 03/02/2005 40.00- 14.19.1062.2 ALLEN, TOBY 111.02 66.58 44.44 - - 02/25/2005 100.00- 14.20.1496.1 ALLRED, GLENN & CHANA 40.00 22.30 17.70 - - 02/09/2005 36.50- 15,15.0110.2 ALTA 165.33 42.81 76.57 45.95 - 02/02/2005 120.00- 7.48.0040.2 AMERICAN BUILDING CO 54.72 27.07 25.22 2.43 - 03/31/2005 25.22- 14.19.1360.1 ANDERSON, KIRK & CHERYL 80,71 - - - 80.71 04/27/2004 35.20- 3,03.5322.2 ANDREWS, FLETCHER & AMY 92.08 38.15 35.29 18.64 - 03/01/2005 61.72- 15,21.1924.1 ANGEL, RUSSELL & DEBORAH 89.38 42.81 46.57 - 02/08/2005 50.33- 16.32,0482.2 ANSON, REBECCA 84.52 40.26 44.02 .24 02/02/2005 98.00- 17.34,3240,8 ANSON, REBECCA 57.24 47.78 9.46 - - 9.09.9676.1 APOLLO HOMES 34.54 22.16 12.38 - 02/07/2005 26.78- 15,22.2376.4 ARMSTRONG, BEN 105.74 32.74 36.50 36.50 01/26/2005 82.16- 9,09.9314.2 ARNOLD, RYAN 42.02 24.32 17.70 - 02/25/2005 21.46- 15.21.3276.5 BACON, JUDE 152.11 31,53 46.57 74.01 01/06/2005 90.43- 17.33.3648.5 BACON, TOM 69.47 47,77 17.70 4.00 _ 15.22.0216,2 BAIMBRIDGE, DAVID 69.24 36.50 32.74 - - 02/28/2005 40.26- 16.31.3480,1 BAIRD, CATHARINE D 43.80 25.22 18.58 - 02/25/2005 33,00- 17.34.1736,1 BAIRD, JASON 99.32 47.78 51.54 - 02/11/2005 44.02- 10.10.0118,1 BAKER, DUSTIN 115.39 31.11 36.50 47.78 01/04/2005 44.02- 16.32.1172.1 BAKER, ELSIE M. 69.24 36.50 32.74 - 02/03/2005 69.24- 17.34.0632A BAKER, JAMES & SHIRLEY 69.24 32.74 36.50 02/11/2005 40.26- 3.90.0272,1 BAKER, ROBERT & ANNE 39.16 17.70 21.46 - 02/25/2005 40.26- 9,92,7020.3 BALLARD. MICHAEL & JACQUE 78.82 24.85 20.25 33.72 12/02/2004 178.64- 17.34,2768.2 BARBEY, THOMAS 63.22 61.61 1.61 - 03/08/2005 60.00- 18.42.2300.2 BARBEY, THOMES & BARBARA 80,52 40,26 40.26 02114/2005 40.26- 16.32.0744.1 BARNARD, WILLIAM 77.15 39.05 38.10 - 03/07/2005 40.00- 15.21.3036.2 BARR, GERALDINE 128.56 41.60 41.60 45.36 01/25/2005 90.72- 9.09.0160.2 BARRIE, WILLIAM 50,44 42.92 7.52 - 04/05/2005 35.29- 16.31,3556.3 BAUM, JAMES 69,24 40,26 28.98 01/21/2005 70.06- 13.13.1200,3 BEATON, BONNIE 96.28 53.47 42.81 - 02/22/2005 46.57- 16.32.0652,2 BECKLEY, BRADLEY 40.78 36.50 4.28 03/29/2005 80.00- 14.19.6576.3 BECKMAN, RICK & DARLA 109.98 69.72 40.26 02/22/2005 44.02- 17.34.0394.2 BELL, KEVIN & SUSANNE 38.15 35.29 2.86 _ 17.34.1902.3 BENGOECHEA. MIKE Q1 Rn An >a 91 cn 3.03,5410.1 BETHERS, PLATT G JR 5.21.1410.2 BETZOLD, MARK & SHF 9.09.9112.2 BEVINS, LAURA & KING 8,42.4038.3 BIBIKOV, DANIEL ' in Msg column indicates no Notice is 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:36pm Current Period: 04/0512005 No Delinquent Minimum Amountbelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 17.79.0503.1 BIGHORN ENT 56.86 21.46 17.70 17.70 02/11/2005 3.94- 18.43.0088.3 BILLS, GLEN & ELIZABETH 69.24 32.74 36.50 - 02/22/2005 36,50- 16.,32,0648.1 6.50-16.32.0648.1 BK PROPERTIES 56.86 17.70 17.70 21.46 01/25/2005 67.86- 16.31.0446,1 BOICE, MARY 70.38 21.28 25.04 24.06 01/31/2005 25.04- 15.21.0064,2 BORUP, BRENT & JEANETTE 94.35 46.57 47.78 - 03/01/2005 51.54- 3.03,5186.3 BOSWORTH, SHARON 58.40 30.63 27.77 03/21/2005 39,05- 13A3,2064.5 BOWENS, SANDRA & ALFRED 46.86 39.36 7.52 03/11/2005 28.98- 17.34.0440.7 BOWLES, LORA & MARK 350,54 186.90 163.64 - 02/25/2005 150,00- 3.03.5340.2 BRAINARD, ERIC & JENNIFER 43,32 42.19 1.13 - 9.09.0340.2 BRANCH, AMBER 90.50 51.45 39.05 - - 02/11/2005 42.81- 116.32.0926.1 BRIGGS, NADINE 400.72 40.26 51.54 66.58 242.34 03/23/2005 20.00- 110.20.0066.2 BROWN, MURRAY & DIANNE 27.44 22.30 5.14 - 16.31.0840.3 BROWNE, TROY & SARA 54.20 25.22 28.98 0310112D05 28.98- 14.20.2016.2 BROWNING, WHITNEY & NICHO 113.34 66.77 46.57 - 02111/2005 50.33- 17.33.3746.1 BRUCE, DARIN & MARTINA 102.62 51.54 51.08 - 03/02/2005 52.00- 18.42,2142.2 BULLOCK, JEAN MARIE 80.52 36.50 44.02 - 02/15/2005 40.26- 14.19.4438.7 BURCHFIELD, DARRAL 64.50 56.70 7.80 - - 03/14/2005 45.00- 14.19.5494.5 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 78,94 43.65 35.29 02/15/2005 23.79- 17.33.2264.2 BURNS, E. GALE 76.76 47.78 28.98 - 02/25/2005 116:30 - 16.32.0406.4 BURTON, DON 72.56 69.14 3.42 - 18.42.2460.1 BURTON, JACK 74.34 35.29 39.05 02/07/2005 70.42- 17.34.0696.1 BUTTRAM, DEANNA 68.54 52.88 15.66 02/11/2005 100.00- 15.22,2262.2 BYERS, STEVEN 70.58 35.29 35.29 03/01/2005 42.81- 16.31.3528.2 CALLIVAN, MATTHEW 37.40 36.50 .90 03/24/2005 35.60- 15.21.0522.1 CALWELL, MARC 73.46 35.29 38.17 - 02/2812005 78.00- 17.33.2854.3 8.00-17.33.2854.3 CANCHOLA, ALFRED & BRIDGE 91.80 47.78 44.02 02/08/2005 47.78- 16.32.0910.3 CANNELL, FRANK & CATHY 208.34 67.78 44.02 47.78 48.76 01/05/2005 52.68- 8.08.0584.1 CANYON CREST HOMES 64.80 21.18 17.70 21.46 4.46 - 18.42.0260,1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 198.54 89.87 108.67 - 02/25/2005 29.16- 18,42,0258.1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 506.58 247.65 258.93 02/25/2005 225.84- 6.06,1430.2 CAPUTO, DAVID & NANCY 94.01 70.68 23,33 03/21/2005 29.34- 14.20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 49.54 28.08 21.46 - 02/11/2005 25.22- 17.34.2114.2 CARR, NANCY 82,33 28.98 28.98 24.37 01/0312005 187.05- 9.09.9146.2 CATALANO, DOMINIC 103,80 57.23 46.57 - 03!0212005 97.88 - 17.33.3716.3 CATT, PAMELA 74.34 35.29 39.05 02/28/2005 42.89 - 9.09.0360.3 CEREGHINO, DAVID & DEBORA 92.19 51.93 40.26 02/28/2005 44.02- 14.14.3012.2 CHAMPAGNE, KIMBERLY & DEN 107.23 59,45 47.78 - 03/01/2005 100,10- 17.33.2630.2 CHANDLER, MICHAL 87.07 27.77 27.77 31.53 01/04/2005 127,90- 18.42.2582,1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 63,06 27.77 35.29 - 02/28/2005 77.12- 15.22,0848,1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 104.42 54.09 50.33 - 03/01/2005 84.09- 9.92.7106.3 CHAVEZ, ROBERT 29.73 22.30 7.43 - - - 16.32.0362.1 CHERRY LANE MOBILE PARK 18.83 15.07 3.76 03/10/2005 18.83- 15.15.0034.2 CHRISTENSEN, BRANDON & ME 69.05 39.05 30.00 - 03/01/2005 81.86- 15.15.0047.2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 74.96 56.64 18.32 - 04/05/2005 80.00- 18.42,3092.2 CHRISTENSEN, SHARON 68.14 21.46 25.22 21.46 01/04/2005 32.98- 18.42.2346.2 CHRISTIANSON, LACEY A. 164,50 65.37 99.13 - 02/03/2005 165,48- 16.32.0320.1 CHURCH OF GOD 216,28 110.02 106.26 02/14/2005 110,02- 16.32.0270.1 CHURCH OF GOD 22.62 11.31 11.31 02/14/2005 1882- 7.40.0094.1 883- 7.40.0094.1 CLARK, RICKY 18.42.2376.3 CLAY, STEVEN 10.10.1028.2 CLYDE, TIFFANY 15.21.1766.1 COFFMAN, RICK 16.31.0796.2 COLLINS, LINDA 17.34.2786.1 CORCORAN, BR .. in Msg column indicates no Ni CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:38pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 8.81.0201.1 COREY BARTON CONSTRUCTIC 21.45 21.18 .27 03/17/2005 8,25- 8.85.0006.2 CRANER, DON & TERA 96.28 53.47 42.81 02/15/2005 93.83 - 1a.42.2530.2 CRAWFORD, CHRISTIAN 129.40 62.82 66.58 02/11/2005 55.30- 14.20.1352.1 CRESTWOOD CONSTRUCTION 64.04 42.58 21.46 03/01/2005 21.46- 9,09.9416.1 CRESTWOOD CONSTRUCTION 86.74 47.69 39.05 - 02/14/2005 46-57- 14.19.6670.1 CRIST, JERRY 73.11 40.37 32.74 - 03/01/2005 36.50- 7.40.0328A CULLUM, DAVID 92,02 51.93 40.09 - 02/28/2005 90.00- 15.21.2922.4 CUTLER, KIMBERLY 124.05 28.98 28.98 66,10 - 02/03/2005 65.00- 18.42.0434.1 DAHLGREN, SHIRLEY 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 02/2212005 28.98- 3,03.5308.1 DALE HOMES 56.58 21.18 17.70 17.70 01/14/2005 56.86- 18.4Z2388.2 DALY, BERT 108.73 35,29 39.05 34.39 01/04/2005 120.00- 14,14.3634.2 DANIELS, RICHARD & JOANNE 122.16 46,48 37.84 37.84 01/18/2005 40.62- 15.21.1788.2 DAVENPORT, ANTHONY 133.66 54.23 79.43 - 03/07/2005 40.00- 18.42.2400.1 DAVIS, LEE W. 35.58 35.29 .29 - 03/08/2005 35,00- 15.15,3010.2 DE JONG, JEANETTE 103.00 36.50 66.50 - 02102/2005 91,79- 14.19.0258.2 DE YOUNG, JON & KAY 42.81 39.05 3.76 - 04/04/2005 39.05 - 16.31.3002.3 DENKER, ERIN & JEFF 89.38 46.57 42.81 - 02/28/2005 96.90- 16.32.1330.1 DESPOT, CARRI E 29.43 28.98 .45 - 03/07/2005 36.05- 14.19.7326.2 DICK, MICHAEL & TIA 89.38 42.81 46.57 - 02/25/2005 88,08- 18.42.0428,3 DIEDERICH, SHERYL 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 01/31/2005 50.44- 6.06,1254,2 DITTMAN, AARON & JANALEE 45.47 44.53 .94 - 02/25/2005 33.87- 15.21.2804.3 DITTMAN, DREW 86.96 37.84 49.12 - 02/14/2005 41.60- 6.06,1012.2 DIXON, CRAIG 60.49 30.38 30.11 01/26/2005 33.87- 17,34.1690.1 DOCKWEILER, THOMAS & TERF 88.04 44.02 44.02 03/01/2005 55.30- 18.42.4202.1 DOUGHTY, KELLY 81.86 42.81 39.05 02/08/2005 85.62- 15.211.1942.2 DRIFKA, PATRICIA 35.40 17.70 17.70 - 02/01/2005 79,26- 17.a4.0398,1 DUNCAN, RICHARD 69.24 36.50 32.74 01/31/2005 85.10- 16.32.0856.1 DUPREE, LISA K 113.82 66.50 47.32 03/0212005 52.00- 18,42,2396.4 DUVALL, KEN & PATTI 77.96 60.26 17.70 02/08/2005 28.75 - 17,85,0001.1 EAGLE SPRINGS INVESTMENT: 23.23 3.48 3.48 3.48 12.79 17.34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S. 74.34 39.05 35.29 - - 03/01/2005 115,62- 16.31.3D34.1 EDWARDS, MARILYN 48.44 25.22 23.22 02103/2005 75.00- 15.22.1502.2 EDWARDS, ROBERT 199.60 101.68 97.92 03/0212005 98.86- 17.33.2558.1 EL-BAKRI KIMBERLY 95.56 44.02 51.54 02122/2005 88.20- 18.42.4328.1 ELDRIDGE, PHILP & URQUICO, . 53.20 25.22 27.98 - 02128/2005 29.00- 14.20.1978.1 ELLIOTT, JANE 104.74 56.70 48.04 - 03/07/2005 70.00- 8.08.1106.2 ELLIS, AMY 64.58 35.60 28.98 - 02111/2005 32.74- 17.34.0592.1 ELLIS, TODD & DANA 56.74 42.81 13.93 - 03/14/2005 90.00- 3.03.5582.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 35.78 30.00 5.78 - - 3.03.5708.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 143.14 93.26 49.88 03/01/2005 4.76- 3.03.5576.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 17.24 15.78 1.46 - - 10.20.0248.1 EQUITY QUEST HOMES 10.10 6.96 3.14 - - 16.32A 152.2 ESPINOLA, MIGUEL & MARGARI 71.20 36.50 34.70 02128/2005 20,00- 17.33.2404.1 FARRELL, MICHAEL 38.16 36.50 1.66 03/23/2005 39,00- 17.33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 61.72 32.74 28.98 03/09/2005 36.50- 3.03.5096.2 FEHER, A. & SCHMITT, L. 40.19 37.90 2.29 - 15.21.0988.3 FIELDING, J. DAVID & ALISON 35.32 35.29 .03 - 03/08/2005 39.02- 15.22.1768.2 FIELDS, SHARON HOPE 52.88 37.84 15.04 - 04/05/2005 37.84- 10.10.2158.1 FISHER CUSTOM HOMES 78.24 22.16 17.70 17.70 20.68 - 14.14.3516.2 FLORES, DAVID 102.06 55.49 46.57 - - 03/01/2005 54.09 - 8.08.5010.2 FOSTER, COREY 70.23 47.69 22.54 - 15.22.1618.1 FOWERS, JOHN 102.00 49.12 52.88 - 02/01/2005 135,76- 15.22.2586.2 FRANKLYN, MARK & DONNA 118.08 56.64 45.36 16.08 02/03/2005 50.00- 8,08,0452.2 0.00- 8,08.0452.2 FRIES. NATHAN in Msg column indicates no N CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:40pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmauntDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01!2012005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 17.34.1088.2 FUCHS, DARRIN 74.54 44.02 30.52 03/08/2005 50,00- 15,21.2980.2 FUNK, DEENA 112.93 77.64 35.29 - 02/11/2005 91.01- 17.34.0806.1 1.01-17.34.0806.1 GABRIEL. RON 84.28 44.02 40.26 02/08/2005 64.66- 15.22.2608.2 GALLOWAY, JERMAINE & KR1SI 131.71 - - 15.89 115.82 11/0212004 80.00- 15.21.2038.1 GARCES, JAMES 42.81 39.05 3.76 - - 03/28/2005 39.05- 14.20.0430.2 GARCIA, STEVE & JULIA 38.94 17.70 17.70 3.54 - 15.22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 61.94 54.09 7.85 - - 03/17/2005 50.00- 17.34.1906.1 GARDNER, MARLA JO 60.78 32.74 28.04 - 01/13/2005 90.00- 17,79.0326.2 GARMAN, SHAWN 76.76 32.74 44.02 - 02/07/2005 42.69- 17.33.2302.1 GARRARD, DALE 68.03 $5.29 32.74 - - 03/10/2005 36,50- 16.31.0726.2 GARRETT, PHILLIP 51.81 24.01 27.77 .03 - 02/15/2005 26.96- 17.86.0010.2 GARRO PROPERTIES, INC. 128.27 5.97 10.82 111.48 10/07/2004 29.89- 18.42.2144.4 GEDDINGS, JIM & EILEEN 40.54 17.70 17.70 5.14 - - 8.08.0152.2 GENTER, SHARON 119.33 104.45 14.88 - 02/26/2005 139.76- 17.86.0012.2 GERRANS, ROSEMARY & PECK 35.74 17.70 18.04 - 15.22.1596.4 GIAUQUE, PAUL 78.02 24.01 54.01 02/0212005 137.49- 13,13,8446.3 GIBBS, JOSEPH & GAYLENE 131.78 51.45 80.33 02/0212005 144.73- 16,31,3538.2 GILES,PATRICIA 49.37 28.98 20.39 - 02/25/2005 40.00- 10,20.0026.2 GILL, HANSJEET & AMARJEET 75.13 38.63 36.50 - 02/28/2005 76.60- 18,42.0366.1 GILLUM. DERICK & AMY 74.34 35.29 39.05 '03107/2005 35.29- 13.13.8444.2 GLASGOW, LLOYD & JUDI 92.19 51.93 40.26 02/08/2005 118.75- 15.22.1622.4 GOHR, DOUGLAS 179.79 136.98 42,81 03/01/2005 107.12- 3.15.0416.1 GOLD TREE 20,59 17.11 3,48 - 15.22.1754.2 GRAPATIN, JEREMY & EMILY 120.53 50.33 70.20 03/07/2005 50.00- 17.33.2752,1 GRAVES, DENNIS 84.28 44.02 40.26 02/24/2005 40.70- 15.21.1556.2 GREER, RANDY 79.30 27.77 51.53 02/28/2005 120.39- 17.34.0382.3 GRIMM, KEITH & DESTINY 94.86 36.50 47.78 10.58 02/28/2005 56.00- 15.21.1734.2 GROAT, STEPHANIE 140.59 61.61 78.98 02/24/2005 100.00- 8.08,0246,2 GUN, JERMEY & VELDHOUSE, C 60,82 35,60 25.22 02/01/2005 69.08- 15.21,0462.3 GUNNARSON, HOWARD & RUTt 128.24 56,64 71.60 - 03/0212005 68.00- 15.22.1288,2 GUSSIE, DORTHY 35.40 17,70 17.70 - 02/2312005 51.46- 16.31.0448.4 HALL, JANET 99.32 51.54 47.78 - 02/0712005 62.12- 9.09.0280.2 HALL, STEVEN & HANKINS, LEL, 86.41 46.15 40.26 - 02/08/2005 36.50- 8,115.1321.1 HALLMARK HOMES 43.71 25.92 17.79 - 02/14/2005 3.48- 8.15.0210.1 HALLMARK HOMES 50.16 24.94 25.22 - 02/14/2005 21.46- 14.19.6596.1 HAM, RUSSELL M. 102.92 60.26 42.66 - 03/08/2005 88.00- 17.34.2732.1 HAMILTON, LLOYD 53.10 36.50 16.60 03/15/2005 45.00- 14.14.3520.2 HAMMON, GEORGE & SHARON 87.75 48.70 39.05 02/28/2005 90.20- 16-91,3394.2 HANHARDT, ANDREW & CAMILL 78,10 35.29 42.81 03/01/2005 98.83- 14.14.3640.2 HANSEN, ROBERT & MARY 129.18 117.62 11.56 - 03/03/2005 100.00- 10.10.0104,3 HARDY, MICHAEL & FELICIA 151.60 73.65 50.33 27.62 03/02/2005 75.00- 17.33.2368.2 HARNECK, KARI 105.74 36.50 32.74 36.50 02/15/2005 50.00- 15.21.2090.2 HARRIS, KATHY 154.42 104.09 50.33 - 03/03/2005 110.06- 7.40.0098.3 HARRISON, ELAINE 44.01 43.93 .08 - 03/15/2005 35.21- 15.21.1786.1 HART, DOUGLAS & DONNA 145.34 87.67 57.67 - 03/07/2005 76.18- 16.31.2218.1 HART, GINA 94.59 27.77 35.29 31.53 12127/2004 99.60- 15.22,259D.2 HART, JULIE 94.36 - - 20.25 74.11 09/07/2004 51.09- 15.22.2102.3 HARWOOD, WILLIAM & EMA 79.28 37.84 41.44 - - 02124/2005 80.00- 16,32.1618.3 HAYES, STEPHEN 69.24 36.50 32.74 - 02/22!2005 47.78- 16,31.0140.2 HAYS, JASON & CAROLYNE 63.98 31.53 32.45 - 02/25/2005 40.00- 14.20.1624.1 HEATON, JUDITH A. 76.47 44.94 31.53 - 02/08/2005 68.03- 14.20.3034.2 HEFNER, PAUL 35.40 17.70 17.70 - 17.33,4246,1 HELFERICH, ROGER 54.22 28.98 25.24 03/07/2005 30.00- 18,43.2448.4 HELP FUND 1, LLC 93.14 46.57 40.57 - 03/1612005 46.57- 10.20.0270.2 HELP FUND 2 76.19 40.09 31.53 4.57 - -in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:40pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmaunlDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/2012005 12/2012004 Date Amount 10.20.0024.2 HELP FUND 2 LLC 123.20 32.37 54.01 24.01 12.81 02/03/2005 40,69- 15.22.2526.2 HERBERT, WILLIAM ill 81.86 42.81 39.05 - - 02/10/2005 61.61- 18.42.1862.2 1.61-18.42.1862.2 HEWLETT, WILLIAM D 110.48 40.26 40.26 29.96 01/07/2005 50.00- 9.09.0210.3 HICE, LINDA 57.39 29.62 27.77 - 02/10/2005 65.68- 3.15.2619.1 HILTON, NICHOLAS & JAMIE 38.88 35.40 3.48 - 15.21.1128.2 HINSHAW, TONY 32.74 28.98 3.76 - 04/04/2005 28,98- 17.79.0914.2 HOLMES, KARL & LINDA 33.11 17.70 15.41 - 17.34.1506.3 HOLMES, KARL & LINDA 58.72 55.30 3.42 - 15.22.2334.2 HOLTZ, MARIANNE 35.40 17.70 17.70 02/15/2005 21.46- 14.20.1552.1 HOOK, ARTHUR L. 74.51 63.93 10.58 - 02/01/2005 35.00- 15,22.2130.3 HOUSEL, CHRISTIAN & TIANA 63.40 46.57 16.83 - 9.09.0197.1 HOWELL-MURDOCH DEV 584.38 577.42 6.96 02/01/2005 6.96- 1&42.1860.3 HUFFAKER, ROBERT 78.10 35.29 42.81 - 02/01/2005 78.31- 17.07.0209.2 HUGGINS, MARK 20.56 17.70 2.86 - 16.32.0904.3 HUGHES, GAIL & CLINT 63.06 31.53 31.53 02/10/2005 31.53- 15,15.0048.3 HUNTER, PAUL 83.34 44.02 39.32 03/02/2005 60.00- 16.31.3298.1 HUSON, DAVID SR 73.00 36,50 36.50 - - 03/01/2005 44.02- 15.22.1636.5 HUTCHINSON, GORDON & CAR' 61.05 21.46 21,46 18.13 - 10,10.1290.1 HYMAS, LAURIE 91.03 48.41 42.62 - 03/07/2005 43.00- 17.33.27SCII INGOE, BRADLEY 78.10 39.05 39.05 - 03/03/2005 39.05- 8.15.0054.2 IVIE, RONALD & HOLLY 73.44 41.91 31.53 02/2812005 39.05- 17.34.0508.4 9.05-17.34.0508.4 JACOSSSON, DAVID & DONNA 76.76 36.50 40.26 03/01/2005 40.26- 17.33.0370.1 JAMES COURT APTS 349.74 218.11 131.63 - 03/15/2005 176.75- 16.32.1332.5 JAMES, SHEILA 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 02/01/2005 28.98- 14,19A630.2 JENKINS,LEROY 101.98 28.96 40.26 32.74 - 02/01/2005 93.28- 15,22.2530.2 JENNI, TERRY & KIM 142.53 - - - 142.53 10/05/2004 52.98- 15,21,2830.1 JESSEE, KEVIN 77.66 60.26 17.40 - 04/04/2005 90.00- 9,09.9012.2 JOHNS, CHARLES & TAMARA 100.72 56.70 44.02 02128/2005 59.06- 10.10.0086.2 JOHNSON, ALAN & GAIL 91.113 50.92 40.26 - - 03/01/2005 40.26- 6,08.020S.2 JOHNSON, DEBBIE & JASON 73.11 40.37 32.74 - - 02101/2005 40.26- 18.42.0374.3 JOHNSON, DORTHY & REX 108.90 47.78 59.06 2.06 - 02/25/2005 75.00- 10.10.0676.2 JOHNSON, KEVIN & TIANA 38.99 21.29 17.70 - - 02/08/2005 21.46- 18.42.2394.3 JOHNSON, LYNN 61.72 32.74 28.98 02/07/2005 83.46- 17.33.3600.1 JOHNSON, MICHAEL 41.02 36.50 4.52 03/22/2005 36.50- 17.34.3336.2 JOHNSON, RICHARD & MICHELI 69.38 46.57 42.81 01/31/2005 124.83- 14.19.0098.1 JOHNSON, SAMUEL 62.16 34.399 27.77 02/15/2005 60.12- 15.21.0096.1 JOHNSON, TIMOTHY 56,81 35.29 21.52 03/07/2005 40.00- 3.90,0162.2 JOHNSTON, TRAVIS & JULIE 111 1.64 75.14 36.50 03102!2005 70,26- 15,211,2840,11 JONES, LARRY 70.58 39.05 31.53 02/15/2005 78.10- 16.32.1674.1 JONES, M JAY 61.72 32.74 28.98 03/09/2005 36.98- 14.20.1988.1 JONES, SYLVIA 158.90 138.41 20.49 03/02/2005 200.00- 10.20.0314.2 JORGENSEN. TOM & PATTY 107.90 62.00 45.90 03/01/2005 51.00- 16.32.0522.2 JUHASZ, DON C. 78.98 44.02 34.96 03/08/2005 65.00- 15.21.0530.2 JUSTIN, TRACY 70.58 31.53 39.05 02/11/2005 70.58- 15,22.2092.4 KATHRYN BURNS REVOCABLE 76.76 40.26 36.50 02120/2005 - 16.31.2996.1 KATULA, KELLY 69.24 36.50 32,74 02108/2005 32.74 - 15.21.0028.2 KEENEY, DONLAN & ELISABETI• 64.81 57.77 7.04 03102/2005 90.00- 1&22.1514.2 KEHR, JOHN 61.69 61.61 .08 03/21/2005 66.00- 17.33.2756.1 KELLER, KEVIN 70.58 31.53 39.05 03/0212005 35.29- 16,31,3312.3 KESSLER, NICHOLE 85.62 39.05 46.57 02/01/2005 46.57- 18.42.1810.2 KESTER, ROBERT 87.89 39.05 39.05 9.79 02/09/2005 70.00- 14.20.1470.2 KIBBLE, HOWARD 107.88 71.38 36.50 - 03/0212005 74.54- 17.33.2704.2 KINDALL, DAVID 33.04 28.98 4.06 03/25/2005 40.00- 15.22.0184.1 KING, KRISTY 70.58 35.29 35.29 02/15/2005 42.81- 17.34.3290.2 KOCH, JOSEPH & VILMA 65.48 32.74 32.74 01/31/2005 32.74- *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List -council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:41 pm Current Period: 04/0512005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Gust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02!2012005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 3.03.5618.1 KOLE CROFTS 24.04 20.56 3.48 - - 10.20.0194.2 KROMANN, DENNIS & IRMA 87.14 69.44 17.70 - 03/02/2005 52.38- 10.20.0228.2 KROMANN, DENNIS & IRMA 80.10 62.40 17.70 - 03/0212005 52,38- 10.10.0062.3 KROMAR, BRIAN & KRISTA 69.68 38.15 31.53 - 02/08/2005 63.06- 16.31.0122.2 KUESTER, DUSTIN 100.52 64.02 38.50 - 03/01/2005 44.02- 14.14.5048.3 LAIN, MARTIN 81.60 62.81 18.79 - 03/10/2005 100.00- 18.42.4056.1 LAMOREAUX, KIM 86.69 39.05 46.57 1.07 - 03/18/2005 40.00- 15.21,0456,2 LASLEY, EGAN & ANN 59.30 27.77 31.53 - - 02/09/2005 78.92- 15,21,1970,2 LAURENCE, PATRICK & ROBIN 102.11 31.53 24.01 46.57 - 01/18/2005 66.66- 8.08.5064.2 LAWHORN, JASON & WENDY 94.26 47.69 46.57 - - 03/01/2005 88.40- 10.10.2322.2 LAYNE, DOUGLAS 92.95 53.67 39.28 - - 02/25/2005 85.00- 15.22.1376.1 LEE, RANDOLPH 67.15 35.29 31.86 - - 02/22/2005 50.00- 18.43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 70.58 31.53 39.05 - - 03/02/2005 53.66- 18.42.2736,1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 51.41 35.29 16.12 - - 03/22/2005 35.00 - 17.33.2608.3 LEVICKI, MICHAEL 73.00 36.50 36.50 - - 03/01/2005 15.22.0328.1 LEWIS, JEFFREY 48.37 42.81 5.56 - - 03/01/2005 91.34- 15.22.2178.2 LEWIS, LAWRENCE 74.34 35.29 39.05 - - 02/25/2005 40.26- 8,08,5058.4 LIEU, TINA MARIA 40.76 37.90 2.86 - - - 17.34.0656.3 LIM, YOUNG 54.20 32.74 21.46 - 02/09/2005 36.50- 6.06.9086.2 LIN, EUGENE 86.93 49.30 37.63 - - 01/24/2005 96.21- 17.33.3658.1 LINDSAY, LAURA 35.20 21.46 13.74 - 03/15/2005 35.00- 18.42.2520.1 LOCKYER, MERRIE 93.35 54.09 39.26 - 03115!2005 60,00- 13.13.8556,2 LOGAN, NANCY 100.69 39.16 61.53 - 02/03/2005 111.14- 15.21.1832.2 LOVAN, WALLACE II & KAROLEE 70.58 31.53 39.05 - 02/07/2005 64.04- 15,21.3134.1 LOVE, JAMES & ELIZABETH 99.04 44.02 47.78 7.24 03/01/2005 80.00- 17.33.2706,1 LOVELAND, JEREMY 60.39 25.22 28.98 6.19 02/02/2005 80.00- 16.31.0432.3 LOWDER, MARK & ANGELA 141.46 89,06 52.40 - - 03/02/2005 100.00- 16.31.0780.4 LOWE, TAMMY 33.77 27.77 6.00 - 03/15/2005 60.30- 6.06.1492.2 LOWRY, ROBERT & DEBI 103.63 39.76 63.87 - 02/03/2005 124.01- 16.32.0510.2 LOYD. WOODY & JOY 96.82 65.29 31.53 03!02!2005 77.12- 13.13.9082.2 7.12-13.13.9082.2 LUCAS, CATHERINE 57.06 28.08 28.98 02/22/2005 25.22- 16.32.1320.1 LUKE, SHELLIE M. 89.75 80.33 9.42 04/04/2005 70.00- 17.34.1986.3 LYNCH, JARAD & AHLERS, MAT 147.46 44.02 103.44 02/03/2005 114.36- 14A4.4428.2 14.36 - 14A4.4428.2 MAKA, ANN 120,86 66.77 54.09 02123/2005 65.37- 14.14.5028.2 MARGHEIM, JAMES 92.52 49.71 42.81 - - 01/31/2005 46.57- 18.42.2332.1 MARIN, JOSE 89.38 42.81 46.57 - - 02/15/2005 127.88- 3.18.0106.2 MARKHAM, PAUL & JAMIE 76.87 44.13 32.74 - 03/07/2005 77.58- 18.42.1206.1 MARTIN, LOREN 55.54 27.77 27.77 - 02/25/2005 66.82- 13.13.8930.2 MARTINEZ, RONNIE & TIFFANY 84.61 42.39 40.26 1.96 02/06/2005 79.54- 15.1&0005,2 9.54-15.15.0005.2 MAUZY, JEFFREY & TIFFANI 66.82 31.53 35.29 - - 02/2212005 71.15- 14.20.1942.2 MAYATT, ANNA 55.37 31.36 24.01 - 03/01/2005 69,91- 15.22.2170.3 MCCLOUD, RYAN & WULFF, K. 74.34 39.05 35.29 02/01/2005 81.70- 16.31.0194.1 MCCLURE, HOLLY 75.68 37.84 37.84 03/03/2005 37.84- 14.14.3554.2 MCKINLEY, JACQUELINE 69.85 40.37 29.48 01/31/2005 36.00- 15.21.1158.3 MCKINLEY, JUNE 89.14 54.09 35.05 - 11/23/2004 182.92- 9.92.7014.3 82.92-9.92.7014.3 MCKINNEY, SCOTT 102.61 55.69 32.74 14.18 - 8.81.0110.2 MCLARNEY, KATHRYN & PATRIs 37.01 23.31 13.70 - 17.33.2556.1 MCLEAN, BRANDON 38.16 36.50 1.66 - 03/21/2005 40.00- 17,33,0241A MDC LLC 54.20 25.22 28.98 02/09/2005 51.42- 15.21.1132.1 MELTON, GARY 74.34 39.05 35.29 02/08/2005 82.84- 17.33.2538.1 MENDOZA, GEORGE & ELIZABE 133.16 59.06 74.10 - - 03/14/2005 70.34- 10.42.2422.2 MERCADO, RODERICK 87.07 $1.53 27.77 27.77 - 01/0512005 158.92- 3,03,5388.2 MERRILL, RICHARD W. 60.45 25.05 17.70 17.70 02/28/2005 74.32- 16.31.0494.2 MESZAROS, LILLI 88.47 42.81 45.66 - 03/14/2005 55.00- 14.19.7124,1 MEYERS. TROY & JIMI 88.41 42.81 45.60 02/23/2005 102.00- '** 02.00-'" in Ms9 column indicates no Notice is to be sent S 9 CI'T'Y OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List -council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:41pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 9.09.0130.2 MILLER, JAMES 98,46 42.92 35.29 20.25 01/13/2005 42.72- 1419,0284,2 MILLER, PAULA & ALLAN 81.67 35.29 46.38 - 02/28/2005 43.00- 18.43.0014.2 3.00-18.43.0014.2 MILLHOLLIN, JEFF & SARAH 91.80 47.78 44.02 - 02/08/2005 39.92- 16.31.0860.2 MILLS, DONOVAN 77.47 39.05 38.42 - 02/03/2005 88.00- 17.34.0934.1 MIRANDA, MARK A. 88.04 44.02 44.02 - 03/02/2005 47.78- 10.10.2246.2 MOIR, MIKE & ROBYN 95.95 55.69 40.26 - 02/25/2005 47.78- 14.20.1652.2 MOLEBASH, JOHN & MONICA 138.70 51.93 47.78 38.99 03/15/2005 20.00- 15.2Z0210,1 MONAHAN, MICHAEL 165.10 47.70 17.70 21.46 76.24 11/10/2004 84,19- 17.34,1540,1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 59.94 32.74 27.20 - - 02/28/2005 60.00 - 15.22.1414.3 MOORE, ANNABELLE 55.54 27.77 27.77 - - 02/01/2005 31.53- 9.09.9684.2 MOORE, MICHAEL & TONYA 84.35 45.47 30.32 8.56 - - 6.06.9590.2 MORGAN LAUREL 43.01 34.26 8.75 - 03/01/2005 60.00- 18.42.2774.5 MORIN, MICHAEL 113.39 39.05 39.05 35.29 02/01/2005 51,38 - 13.13.4030.2 MORRIS, JEFFREY & BRENDA 87.42 50.92 36.50 - - 03/1012005 44.02- 8.08.1084.2 MORRIS, LANCE & MEGAN 101.05 54.48 46.57 - - 02/09/2005 40.57- 14.19.1300.2 MORRIS, LAURA 29.97 - - - 29.97 05/28/2004 26.10- 18.42,2368.2 MORRIS, PAUL 124.67 39.05 39.05 46.57 - 02!2812005 45.59- 1,9.21,3296,2 MORRISON, DWAYNE & VICKI 66.82 31.53 35.29 - - 02/08/2005 39.05 - 18.42.1978.1 MORSE, DAVID & SHELLEY 46.32 25.22 21.10 02/22/2005 61,00- 9,09,9266.2 MORTON, JAMES & STEFFANI 71.05 54.48 16.57 03/14/2005 30,00- 15.22.2550,2 MOSGROVE, RONNA & TOM 44.77 42.81 1.96 - 03/15/2005 46.57 - 17.34.0500A MOURITSEN, LAYNE 76.76 40.26 36.50 - - 02107/2005 85.26- 16.32.0650.2 MOWRY, CHARLOTTE 71.90 25.22 21.46 25.22 - 12128/2004 57.96- 15.22.2614.2 MUNDELL, RANDY 61.72 28.98 32.74 - - 02/01/2005 36.50- 14.19.7990.2 MUNKRES, MIKE 61.72 28.98 32.74 - - 02/25/2005 65.48- 3.03.5864.2 MURPHY, MARCUS & JILL 73.42 38.15 35.27 - - 01/21/2005 60.00- 8.08.1112.3 MURRAY, JASON & SARAH 58.24 54.48 3,76 - - 03/30/2005 42.81 - 18.42.1982.2 MURRAY, JAY & MELISSA 80.78 36.50 44.02 .26 - 02/11/2005 85,00- 17.33.0264.2 MUSGRAVE, JOHN & LOUISE 5.35 - - - 5.35 - 3.90.0006.2 MUSTIC, AMEL & JASMINA 73.11 44.13 28.98 - 02/1012005 40.26- 9.92.7022.2 NARDI, ANGELA 82.98 47.69 35.29 02/11/2005 118.40- 16.32.0630.3 NASKASHIMA, NAHO & KLOPFE 69.24 32.74 36.50 - 03/0112005 73.82- 9.09.0274.2 NELSON, MARTIN E 120.96 42.92 39.05 38.99 01/0512005 156.00- 15.21,2874.3 NICHOLS. TINA 57.96 28.98 28.98 - - 01/26/2005 109.18 - 14.20.3022.1 NORTHSTAR CONSTRUCTION 39.16 21.46 17.70 02/01/2005 17.70- 9.09.0156.11 O.P.M. ENTERPRISES 87.19 47.43 39.76 03/01/2005 80.00- 14,20.0692.3 OFFE, CHRIS & SUZANNE 57.96 25.22 32.74 - 02115/2005 23.28- 17.34.2880.1 OHNSMAN, RICHARD 22.46 21.46 1.00 - 03115/2005 24.22- 13.13.8816.2 OLIVER, SHELLI 53.35 49.71 3.64 - 04105/2005 35,00- 14.14.3546.3 OLSON. BRYAN & RACHELLE 57.73 36.61 17.70 3.42 - 10.20.0240.1 ONSITE LLC 53.58 35.88 17.70 - 02/14/2005 35.40- 10.10.2434.2 OPP, ROBERT & DONALD 40.77 27.07 13.70 - 16.32.1460.1 OSSURN, JODY 35.14 28.98 6.16 - 03/1112005 40.00- 1313.9076.2 OTTER, CAROLYN 80.20 40.17 35.29 4.74 03/1112005 35.29- 15.21.1432.2 OWSLEY, RICK & TERI 53.21 52.88 .33 - 03/21/2005 52.00- 3,03,5386.2 PALMER, NICK & NICOLE 77.88 45.14 32.74 - 02/20/2005 - 17.34,1230.1 PARENT, BEAU 40.78 36.50 4.28 - 03/11/2005 40.00- 16.3Z1700,1 PASTIAN, BRYON 72.54 40.26 32.28 - 02!2812005 70.00- 15.15.0524.1 PATTEE, RICHARD & ROSIE 93.14 42.81 50.33 - - 03/01/2005 61.59- 16.32,1392A PATTEN, JASON 88.92 40.26 40.26 8.40 - 03115/2005 32.65- 18.42.1162.3 PEDERSEN, JENNIFER 84.28 44.02 40.26 - - 03101/2005 47.78- 14.14.3580.2 PENDLETON, WES & PAULA 138.26 60.26 50.33 27.67 - 02/23/2005 100.00- 17.33.2308.1 PERRY, DIANNE 57.96 28.98 28,98 - - 02/28/2005 32.74- 15.21.1560.2 PERSINGER, RANDY & PAULINE 111.94 50.33 61.61 - - 02/08/2005 64.89- 7.40.0236.3 PETERSON, JEAN & VAN 372.29 42.39 47.78 59.06 223.06 03/2212005 100.00- *** 00.00-*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:42pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12120/2004 Date Amount 16,32.0690.2 PETTERSON, KENNETH 65,48 32.74 32.74 - 03/01/2005 82.74- 8.08,0222,2 PIATT, WESTON & ANITA 95.27 52,46 42.81 - 02/07/2005 42,81 - 3.03.5276.2 PIERCE, RUSSEL & MARY 74.12 41.38 32.74 - 02/20/2005 - 15.21.0100.2 PIPPIN, LESIE & JEFF 55.54 31.53 24.01 - - 02/08/2005 27.77- 15.21.2604.1 PORTER, RODNEY 81.37 39.05 39.05 3.27 - 01/28/2005 60.00- 15A6.0043.4 0.00 - 15A6.0043.4 PORTER, TAD & MICHELLE 115,62 42.81 72.81 - 02/02/2005 104,59- 15.21.0078.1 POTRIDGE, GAIL 85,62 42.81 42.81 - - 03/01/2005 40.98- 15.211,3062A POWELL, GREG & CATHERINE 368.36 143.12 225.24 - - 03/02/2005 185,00- 17.34.1940.2 PRESLEY, ALLISON 130.46 32.74 58.98 38.74 - 02/02/2005 75.00- 18.48.4101.1 PROPERTIES WEST 149.50 - - - 149.50 01/15/2003 3.48- 15.21.1720.1 PURVIS, BRETT J. 73.00 36.50 36.50 - - 02/09/2005 36.50- 17.34.1172.1 QUARNBERG, CARL & DOROTH 147.18 55.30 91.88 - 03/02/2005 60.00- 8.08.1322.3 QUILANTAN, ALEX & MARTHA 100.04 49.71 50.33 - 03/03/2005 93.14- 14.19.0570.1 RALPHS, ROD 76.76 36.50 40.26 - 02/03/2005 76.76- 16.16.3001A RATCLIFFE INVESTMENTS 20.88 - - - 20.88 - 15.22.2536.2 BEAGLES, ED & KELLIE 88.04 44.02 44.02 - - 02/28/2005 51.54- 7.48.01132.1 REDSTAR CONSTRUCTION 61.59 35.40 21.73 4.46 - 16.32.1318.3 REEDER-GRAY, JULIE 227.16 122.98 104.18 - 02108/2005 70.34- 16.31.3390.2 REIF, JANELLE & HULL, JASON 73.00 36.50 36.50 - 02/28/2005 23.30- 17.33.4578.1 RHINEHART, DOUG & MARY 61.81 35.29 26.52 - 03/09/2005 50.00- 18.4Z3094.1 RHODES, JUSTIN 60.10 27.77 27.77 4.56 03/01/2005 34.00- 8.80,0118.1 RICE, RANDY & COLLEEN 75.10 47.86 5.44 21.80 - - 17.34.1182.1 RICHARDSON, MICHELLE L 54.20 28.98 25.22 - - 02/01/2005 25.22- 3.15.2507.1 RIDGELINE 23.14 18.43 3.48 1.23 - 14.14.9058.1 RIDGELINE 53.10 17.70 17.70 17.70 01/24/2005 17.70- 14.20.0022.2 RIMMER, DAVID 21.46 17.70 3.76 - 02/15/2005 17.70- 18.42.0310.3 RINKS, JOE & SMITH, RANDALL 78.43 42.61 35.62 - 03/09/2005 50.00- 17,33.2580.2 ROBLES, IGNACIO 180.38 28.98 36.50 25.22 89.68 04/01/2005 28.98- 18.43.0328.2 RODIN, ADAM & HEATHER 108.18 57.85 50.33 - - 02/2812005 61.61- 14.19.0336.1 BONG, MARY 85.62 42.81 42.81 02/15/2005 46.57- 15.15.0040.3 ROWLEY, RICHARD 56.69 48.98 9.71 07107/2005 15.51- 7,40.0414,1 ROY, TED 56.05 30.83 25,22 02/01/2005 40.26- 17,33.0128,1 ROYAL DYNASTY 578.45 7.55 7.55 7.55 555.80 06/08/2004 447.50- 10.20,0014,2 RUBEY, ARNOLD & KAY 33.20 26.34 6,86 - - - 15.22,0914.1 RUCKER, JEAN 80.71 42.81 37.90 - 04/04/2005 .50.00- 15.21,011Z2 RUMMLER, MATHEW 74.34 35.29 39,05 - 02/28/2005 75.32- 13,13.6060.1 RUNGE, DUNCAN 115.54 64.00 51.54 - - 03102!2005 S1.54- 9.09.0404.2 SAFFERY, BRETT & KATELLA 100.35 38.63 32.74 28.98 01/25/2005 $0,20- 14.14,5043.3 SARCO, BETTY 75.84 55.69 20.15 - 03/14/2005 40.26- 18.42.2066.1 SAWAS, NAJI 89.38 46.57 42.81 03/01/2005 82.84- 3.03.5800.1 SAWTOOTH HOMES 38.88 21.18 17.70 - 02/28/2005 17.70- 18.42.2046.2 SAYLES, BRETT & JENNIFER 64.20 41.60 22.60 - 03/01/2005 60.00- 15.22.1386.1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 155.43 66.57 42.81 46.05 01/04/2005 116.00- 18.42.1140.3 SCHENCK, DEREK & KRISTINE 179.01 87.89 42.81 48.31 03/14/2005 42.81- 9.09.910Z2 SCHOFIELD, PAUL & HILARY 93.85 32.85 32.74 26.26 02/01/2005 40.00- 17,34,2144.2 $CHRANK, THOMAS 129.40 59.06 70.34 01/26/2005 163.48- 18.42.4310.2 SCHRENK, MICHAEL & CARLA 99.32 47.78 51.54 - - 02/1512005 44.02- 17.34,3264.1 SCOTT, MIKE J. 84.28 40.26 44.02 - 02/14/2005 47.78- 17.U.2760.4 SEALY, CANDYCE 110.60 51.54 $9.06 - 03/01/2005 89.06- 7.48,0744.1 SELECT HOMES 10.30 7.94 2.36 - - - 10.20.0266.1 SHADOW MOUNTAIN CONSTRU 59.64 34.42 25.22 - 02/15/2005 17.70- 18.42.3042.1 SHAMIM, YAMIR 53.77 46.57 7.20 - 02/11/2005 93.46- 14.20.3054.2 SHARP, LIZABETH 57.96 25.22 32.74 - 03/01/2005 94,34- 10.10.2014.2 SHEETS, RICK & HEIDI 90.86 50.60 40.26 - 02101/2005 117.02- 18.42.2526.1 SHELTRON, ROGER 164.70 20.25 39.05 61.61 43,79 01/14/2005 44.77- ""` in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent I CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:42pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02120/2005 01120!2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 17.34.1178.2 SHERBURNE, BROOKE 54.20 25.22 28.98 - 02/08/2005 73.98- 8.85.4042.1 SHERVIK BUILDERS 28.39 22.16 6.23 - - 3.90.0034.2 SHIMAJI, KRISTIN 28.57 22.30 6.27 - 18.42.2495.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 70.58 35.29 35.29 - 02/28/2005 78.10- 15.21.0208.1 SILSBY, TERRY 132.33 31.53 65.29 $5.51 02/0212005 100.00 - 16.31.3518.5 SILVA, JOE & DEBORAH 61.72 17.70 44.02 - 02/2512005 47.78- 15.21.273D.1 SILVESTRI. PAUL & SHANA 77.49 39.05 38.44 03/02/2005 37.00 - 13.13.6054.2 SIMONI, NEIL & TERRYANN 50.28 49.71 .57 - 03/07/2005 31,53- 15,21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 150.72 71.60 79.12 - - 03/07/2005 85.72- 17.34.0820.2 SITZLAR, RON 76.18 25.22 25.22 25.74 02/0912005 35.00- 14.14.9048.3 SLACK, DAVID 84.28 36.50 47.78 - 02/25/2005 44.02- 15.21.2168.2 SMITH, CONNIE 78.10 42.81 35.29 - 02/03/2005 137.04- 9.09.0078,2 SMITH, MICHAEL & ASHLEY 82.98 47.69 35.29 - 02/10/2005 35.29 - 15.21 A 782A SMITH, PAUL 81.86 42.81 39.05 - - 02/25/2005 54,09- 17.33,2296,1 SMITH, RONALD & MELISSA 95.56 44.02 51.54 - 02/28/2005 74,02- 15.21,0550.2 SMITH, TONI 31.54 31.53 .01 - - 03/15/2005 44,00- 16,15.0204.1 SPYGLASS HOMES 13.16 8.56 3.48 1.12 - 7.40.0016.2 STALEY, HOLLY 68.86 68.26 .60 - 03!0212005 109.06- 15.21.0136.2 STARK, MIKE 76.18 35.29 35.29 5.60 01/12/2005 61.22- 8.81.0111.2 STEELE, MICHAEL & SUSAN 55.43 42.30 13.13 - 3.03.5286.2 STEPHENSON, BRANDON & MA 47.85 23.84 24.01 02128/2005 81.70- 17.33.2572.3 STON, JOE 62.06 40.26 21.60 - 03/01/2005 100.00- 18.42.3970.2 STORLIE, THERESA & SCOTT 50.44 28.98 21.46 - - 3.03.5540.2 STREHLOW, ERIC & KATHIE 56.69 21.29 17.70 17.70 - 18.42.1972.2 SWANSON, CORY & CASSANDF 62.70 32.74 29.96 - 03/01/2005 35.52- 18,42.2350,2 TADEVIC, GEORGE 49.38 42.81 6.57 - 03/07/2005 40,00- 6.06.9846.1 TALLMAN, ORRIN 45.29 26.46 18.83 02/14/2005 18,83- 10.20.0198.2 TANNER, BRIAN & KRISTI 85.26 53.47 31.79 03/07/2005 50.00- 115.21.0578.1 THIBAULT, TED 81.86 39.05 42.81 02/2512005 50.33- 13,13,8800,3 THOMPSON. DOUG 25.16 22.30 2.86 - - 16.32.1556.4 THOMPSON, GARY 90.03 44.02 44.02 1,99 03/01/2005 92.59- 16.31.3514.3 THOMPSON, SCOTTIE & REBEK 87.26 44.02 43.24 - 02/23/2005 100.00- 14.19.1364.2 THOMSEN, LORIE 70.58 31.53 39.05 - 02/02/2005 81.86- 8.08.1058.4 THRUPP, BRIAN 96.50 52,94 43.56 - 02/28/2005 52.00- 15.21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 47.38 46.57 .81 - 03/17/2005 42.00- 10.10.2104.2 TODD, LESLIE & ANNEMARIE 117.42 77.16 40.26 - - 03/03/2005 70.26- 15.22.1204.6 TRAINOR, MARJI 70.58 35.29 35.29 - 03/23/2005 39.05- 9.09.0050.2 TRUCHOT, DARREN & CINDY 75.46 40.17 35.29 02/15/2005 31.53- 17,79.0207.2 TURCOTTE, TINAE 63.06 31.53 31.53 - 03/01/2005 71.26- 15.21.11741 TWADDLE, DAVID 117.42 42.81 74.61 - - 03/10/2005 52.29- 10.20.0044.1 TWIN CREEKS CONSTRUCTION 56.69 21.29 17.70 17.70 12/07/2004 35.40- 8.08,1430,2 ULLAND 65.59 36.61 28.98 - 02/15/2005 36.50- 3.03,5154,11 UPLAND HOMES 36.65 36.15 .50 03/01/2005 17.20- 14.14,3018,1 VAIL, RANDY & VICTORIA 97.97 53.95 44.02 02/28/2005 122.76- 18.42,3968.1 VANHOUTEN, MIKE 61.38 35.29 26.09 03/01/2005 60.00- 16.31.3388.3 VASQUEZ, COREY 73.00 36.50 36.50 - 03101/2005 86,65- 15,21.1032.1 VELADA, FEDERICO 96.82 61.53 35.29 03/03/2005 73.36- 15,22,1258.1 VERDUN, MATTHEW 88.18 57.85 30,33 04/01/2005 40.00 - 17.33.2578.1 VERKUYLEN, AD 64.28 40.26 44.02 02/28/2005 83.46- 15,21.27,54.3 VICNG 41.85 39.05 2.80 03101/2005 44,00- 17.34.1314.2 VOGEL, JUSTIN & IRENE 42.92 21.46 21.46 - 02/28/2005 25.22- 3.03.5534,1 VYACHUK OSIPCHUK 8.42 6.96 1.46 - - 16.32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CARA 111.86 39.05 72,81 03/01/2005 42.81- 16.32.044-4.1 WARNER, MICHAEL & CYNTHIA 91.20 51.54 39.66 - 03/09/2005 35.00- 15.21.0070.1 WAY, KELLY 124.67 39.05 46.57 39.05 02/09/2005 90.21- **' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:43pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12!2012004 Date Amount 15.21.3144.1 WEAVER, LARRY 47.24 32.74 14.50 - 09/30/2004 350.00- 18.42.2534.1 WEIRUM, KENNETH 74.34 35.29 39,05 - 02!2812005 90.36 - 15.21.1412.2 WEISWEAVER, CHARLES 73.00 36.50 36.50 - 03/07/2005 36.50- 8.15.0066.1 WESTROCK HOMES 9.17 7.94 1.23 - - - 15.21.2132.2 WHITLEY, JENNIFER 81.11 66.57 14.54 - 02/25/2005 71.02- 16.16.3508.2 WHITMIRE, SCOTT & SYNDI 65.48 32.74 32.74 - 02/01/2005 36,50- 10,55.2480.1 WHITNEY HOMES 8.87 6.96 1.91 - - 15.21.1590.1 WHITTEN, DAVID 73.19 35.29 37.90 - 03/07/2005 40.00- 16.31.3266.4 WIEDMEIER, GLENN & LISA 84.28 40.26 44.02 - - 02/28/2005 83.46- 17.33.2346.2 WILLIAMS, DARREL 65.48 32.74 32.74 - 02/11/2005 69.73- 17.34.0840.1 WILLIAMS, JASON & MICHELLE 69.24 32.74 36.50 - 02/28/2005 36.50- 17.33.3578.2 WILLIAMS, RONALD 42.81 39.05 3.76 - 04/05/2005 39.05- 16.32.1080.2 WILLIAMS, SHAWN & MARY JO 78.10 35.29 42.81 - 02/28/2005 146.75- 16.32.1252.2 WILLIAMSON, DALE 49.38 28.98 20.40 - - 03/1512005 11.31- 15.21.2184.2 WILSON, BRADLY 63.06 31.53 31.53 - - 03102!2005 83.29- 15.21.1092.1 WILSON, CHARLES & HILDA 73.00 32.74 40.26 - - 03/24/2005 36.50- 3.90.0064.2 WILSON, LINDA & NATHAN 160.46 64.22 96.24 - - 02/28/2005 169.00- 10.10,2358A WINTERBUREN, BILL 38.99 21.29 17.70 - - 02/25/2005 21.66 - 3.15.3801.1 WOLFE, BRANDON AND ZANE, : 59.25 49.71 9.54 - - 15.22.2110.3 WOOD, PHILLIP & MARY 78.69 50.33 28.36 - 02/28/2005 74.09- 15.21.1130.5 YASUDA, GARY & SHAWNA 166.28 17.70 32.74 28.98 86.86 11130!2004 55.00- 10.20.0150.2 YEAGER, BRIAN 85.40 48.90 36.50 - - 01/28/2005 119.80- 17.33.4250.1 YEAGER, ERIK 91.80 44.02 47.78 - 02109/2005 84.08- 16.31.3280.3 YENOR, SUNSHINE 108.18 54.09 54.09 - - 03/01/2005 57.85- 13.13.8458.2 YORK, RICHARD 89.93 34.39 31.53 24.01 - 12/28/2004 62.08- 14.20.1370.1 YOUNG, JENNY 75.29 43,93 31.36 - 02/08/2005 34.86- Grand 4.86-Grand Totals: 43,043.28 21,968.37 16,740.46 2,147.13 2,187.32 Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No () = (<) 880000001 Customer. Bill Cycle = 2 RECEIVED APR - 5 2005 DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF �1'yci� 1ia'cne Schedule for "RIL 6, 2005 Cycle 2 MAYOR: Pursuant to Meridian City Code 9-1-21, delinquent water users shall have the right to request a pre termination hearing prior to water service being disconnected. No water users having requested such pre- termination hearing for April 5, 2005, water service for the attached turn-off list will be terminated on April 6, 2005. The total amount of the turn-off list is $21,074.91. CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 04105!2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No () = (c) 880000001 Customer. Bill Cycle = 2 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 17120/2004 Date Amount 13.13.8426.2 A.M. THOMPSON MOONLAKE Ti 62.17 57.03 5.14 - 03/25/2005 70.00- 17.86.0036.2 AAGAARD, JANICE 33.31 27.77 5.54 - 02/15/2005 50.00- 18,42.2992.4 ABLEMAN, DOUG & ANGELA 69,24 36.50 32.74 - - 02128/2005 109.54- 16.32.11110.2 ACACIA EQUITIES 114.44 70.34 44.10 - - 03!0112005 50.00- 3.15.1338,1 ACC HOMES 42.80 37.36 5.44 - - 01/04/2005 20.00- 15.22.1330.2 ACTION HOME BUYERS LLC 81.88 24.01 57.87 - - 02/17/2005 197.93- 17.34.1108.3 ADAMS, CYNTHIA 88.38 77.78 10.60 - - 03/02/2005 100.00- 15.21.3146.3 AGUERO, JEREMY 85.73 31.53 25.22 28.98 - 01/10/2005 41.38- 15.21.2800.2 AINGER, DAVE 35.40 17.70 17.70 - 9.09.9020.2 ALLEN, NANCY & RUSSELL 92.52 53.47 39.05 - - 02/2512005 39.05- 15.21.0082.1 ALLEN, SCOTT 48.52 - - 10.82 37.70 01/24/2005 77.00- 16,31.3422.1 ALLEN, SEDENA 59.22 24.01 27.77 7.44 - 03/02/2005 40.00- 14A9.1062.2 ALLEN, TOBY 111.02 66.58 44.44 - 02/25/2005 100.00- 14.20.1495.1 ALLRED, GLENN & GHANA 40.00 22.30 17.70 - - 02/09/2005 36.50- 15.15,0110.2 ALTA 165.33 42.81 76.57 45.95 - 02102t2005 120.00- 7.48.0040.2 AMERICAN BUILDING CO 54.72 27.07 25,22 2.43 - 03/31/2005 25.22- 14.19.1360.1 ANDERSON, KIRK & CHERYL 80.71 - - 80.71 04/27/2004 35.20- 3.03.5322.2 ANDREWS, FLETCHER & AMY 92.08 38.15 35.29 18,64 - 03/01/2005 61.72- 15.21.1924.1 ANGEL, RUSSELL & DEBORAH 89,38 42.81 46.57 - 02108!2005 50.33- 116.32.0482.2 ANSON, REBECCA 84.52 40.26 44.02 .24 - 02/02/2005 98.00- 17.34.3240.8 ANSON, REBECCA 57.24 47,78 9,46 - 9.09.9676.1 APOLLO HOMES 34.54 22.16 12,38 - 02/07/2005 26.78- 15.22,2376.4 ARMSTRONG, BEN 105.74 32,74 36.50 36.50 01/26/2005 82.16- 9.09.9314.2 ARNOLD, RYAN 42.02 24.32 17.70 - 02/25/2005 21.46- 15,21.3276.5 BACON, JUDE 152.11 31.53 46.57 74.01 01/06/2005 90.43- 17,33.3648.5 BACON, TOM 69.47 47.77 17.70 4.00 15.22.0216.2 BAIMBRIDGE, DAVID 69.24 36.50 32.74 - 02/28/2005 40,26- 16.31.3480,11 BAIRD, CATHARINE D 43.80 25.22 18.58 02/25/2005 33.00- 17-34A736.1 BAIRD, JASON 99.32 47.78 51.54 - 02/11/2005 44.02- 10-10-0118.1 BAKER, DUSTIN 115.39 31.11 36.50 47.78 01!0412005 44.02- 16.32.1172.1 BAKER, ELSIE M. 69.24 36.50 32.74 - - 02/03/2005 69.24- 17.34.0632.1 BAKER, JAMES & SHIRLEY 69.24 32.74 36.50 02/11/2005 40.26- 3.90.0272.1 BAKER, ROBERT & ANNE 39.16 17.70 21.46 - 02/25/2005 40,26- 9.92,7020.3 BALLARD, MICHAEL & JACQUE 78.82 24.85 20.25 33.72 12/02/2004 178.64- 17.34.2708.2 BARBEY, THOMAS 63.22 61.81 1.61 - - 03/08/2005 60.00- 18.42.2300.2 BARBEY, THOMES & BARBARA 80.52 40.26 40.26 02114/2005 40.26- 16,32.0744.1 BARNARD, WILLIAM 77.15 39.05 36.10 - 03/07/2005 40.00- 15,21.306.2 BURR, GERALDINE 128.56 41.60 41.60 45,36 - 01/25/2005 90.72- 9,09.0160.2 BARRIE, WILLIAM 50.44 42.92 7.52 - - 04/05/2005 35,29- 16.31.3556.3 BAUM, JAMES 69.24 40.26 28.98 - 01/21/2005 70.06- 13.13.1200.3 BEATON, BONNIE 96.28 53.47 42.81 - 02122/2005 46,57- 16.32.0652.2 BECKLEY, BRADLEY 40.78 36.50 4.28 - 03/29/2005 80,00- 14. 19.6576.3 0,00- 14.19.6576.3 BECKMAN, RICK & DARLA 109.98 69.72 40.26 - 02!2212005 44,02- 17.34,0394.2 BELL, KEVIN & SUSANNE 38.15 35.29 2.86 17.34.1902.3 BENGOECHEA, MIKE 91.80 40.26 51.54 02/15/2005 36.68- 17.33.2772.3 BENNETT, GREG 92,41 54.09 38,32 - 04/04/2005 38.33- 3.03.5410.1 BETHERS, PRATT G JR 57.56 22.16 17.70 17.70 01/10/2005 17.10 - 15.21.1410,2 BETZOLD, MARK & SHARON 151.96 66.58 85.38 03/01/2005 130.34- 9.09.9112.2 BEVINS, LAURA & KINGS, PHILL 64.58 35.60 28.98 02/23/2005 65.32- 18,42.403B.3 BIBIKOV, DANIEL 76.76 36.50 40.26 - 03/01/2005 98.82- ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:36pm Current Period: 0410512005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 17.79.0503.1 BIGHORN ENT 56.86 21.46 17.70 17.70 02/11/2005 3.94- 18.43.0088.3 BILLS, GLEN & ELIZABETH 69.24 32,74 36.50 - 02/22/2005 36.50- 16.32.0648.1 BK PROPERTIES 56.86 17.70 I7.70 21.46 01/2512005 67.86- 16.31.0446.1 BOICE, MARY 70.38 21.28 25.04 24.08 - 01/31/2005 25.04- 15.21.0064.2 BORUP, BRENT & JEANETTE 94.35 46.57 47.78 - - 03/01/2005 51.54- 3.03.5166.3 BOSWORTH, SHARON 58.40 30.63 27.77 03/21/2005 39.05- 13.13.2064.5 BOWENS, SANDRA & ALFRED 46.88 39.36 7.52 03/11/2005 28.98- 17.34.0440.7 BOWLES, LORA & MARK 350.54 186.90 163.64 - 02!2512005 150.00- 3.03.5340.2 BRAINARD, ERIC & JENNIFER 43.32 42.19 1.13 - 9.09.0340.2 BRANCH, AMBER 90.50 51.45 39.05 - 02/11/2005 42.81 - 16.32.0926.1 BRIGGS, NADINE 400.72 40.26 51.54 66.58 242.34 03/23/2005 20.00- 10,20.0066.2 BROWN, MURRAY & DIANNE 27.44 22.30 5.14 - - - 16.31.0840.3 BROWNE, TROY & SARA 54.20 25.22 28.98 - 03/01/2005 28.98- 14.20.2016.2 BROWNING, WHITNEY & NICHO 113.34 66.77 46.57 - 02/11/2005 60.33- 17.33.3746.1 BRUCE, DARIN & MARTINA 102.62 51.54 51.08 - 03/0212005 52.00- 18.42,2142.2 BULLOCK, JEAN MARIE 80.52 36.50 44.02 - - 02/15/2005 40.26 - 14.19.4438.7 BURCHFIELD, DARRAL 64.50 56.70 7.80 - 03/14/2005 45.00- 14.19.5494.5 5.00-14.19.5494.5 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 78.94 43.65 35.29 02/15/2005 23.79- 17.33.2264.2 BURNS, E. GALE 76.76 47.78 28.98 02/25/2005 116,30- 16,3Z0406.4 BURTON, DON 72.56 69.14 3.42 - 18AZ2460.1 BURTON, JACK 74.34 35.29 39.05 02107/2005 70.42- 17.34.0696,1 BUTTRAM, DEANNA 68.54 52.88 15.66 02111/2005 100.00- 15.22.2262.2 BYERS, STEVEN 70.58 35.29 35.29 03/01/2005 42.81- 16.313528,2 CALLIVAN, MATTHEW 37.40 36.50 .90 03/24/2005 35.60- 15.21.0522.1 CALWELL, MARC 73.46 35.29 38.17 02/28/2005 78.00 - `IT33,2654.3 CANCHOLA, ALFRED & BRIDGE' 91.80 47.78 44.02 02/08/2005 47,78- 16,32.0910.3 CANNELL, FRANK & CATHY 208.34 67.78 44.02 47.78 48.76 01/05/2005 52,68- 8.08.0584.1 CANYON CREST HOMES 64.80 21.18 17.70 21.46 4.46 - 18.42.0260.1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 198.54 89.87 108.67 - - 02/25/2005 29.16- 18,42.0258.1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 506.58 247.65 258.93 - 02/2512005 225.84- 6.06.1430.2 CAPUTO, DAVID & NANCY 94.01 70.68 23.33 - 03/21/2005 29.34- 14.20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 49.54 28.08 21.46 - 02/11/2005 25.22- 17.34.2114.2 CARR, NANCY 82.33 28.98 28.98 24.37 01/03/2005 187.05- 9.09.9146.2 CATALANO, DOMINIC 103.80 57.23 46.57 - 03/0212005 97.88- 17.33.3716.3 GATT, PAMELA 74.34 $5.29 39.05 02/28/2005 42.81- 9.09.0360.3 CEREGHINO, DAVID & DEBORA 92.19 51.93 40.26 02/28/2005 44.02- 14.14.3012.2 CHAMPAGNE, KIMBERLY & DEN 107.23 59.45 47.78 - 03/01/2005 100.10- 17.33.2630.2 CHANDLER, MICHAL 87.07 27.77 27.77 31.53 01/04/2005 127.90- 18,42.2562.1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 63.06 27.77 35.29 - 02/28/2005 77.12- 16.22,0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 104.42 54.09 50.33 03/01/2005 84.09- 9.92,7106.3 CHAVEZ, ROBERT 29.73 22.30 7.43 16.32.0362.1 CHERRY LANE MOBILE PARK 18.83 15.07 3.76 03/10/2005 18.83- 15.15.0034.2 CHRISTENSEN, BRANDON & ME 69.05 39.05 30.00 - 03101/2005 81.86- 15.15,0047,2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 74.96 56.64 18.32 - 04/05/2005 80.00- 18.42,3092.2 CHRISTENSEN, SHARON 68.14 21.46 25.22 21.46 01/04/2005 32.98- 18.42.2346.2 CHRISTIANSON, LACEY A. 164.50 65.37 99.13 - 02103/2005 165.48- 16.32.0320.1 CHURCH OF GOD 216.28 110.02 106.26 - 02/14/2005 110.02- 16.32.0270,1 CHURCH OF GOD 22.62 11.31 11 31 - mildr?nnr 1A uz - 7.40.0094.1 CLARK, RICKY 8.42.2376.3 CLAY, STEVEb 0.10.1028.2 CLYDE, TIFFAI 5.21.1766.1 COFFMAN, RIC 6.31.0796.2 COLLINS, LINC 7.34.2786.1 CORCORAN, B ` in Ms9 column indicates no CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:3Bpm Current Period: 04/0512005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 6.81.0201.1 COREY BARTON CONSTRUCTIC 21.45 21.18 .27 - - 03/17/2005 8.25- 8.85.0006.2 CRANER, DON & TERA 96.28 53.47 42.81 - - 02115/2005 93.83- 18,42.2530.2 3.83-18.42.2530.2 CRAWFORD, CHRISTIAN 129.40 62.82 66.58 02/11/2005 55.30- 14.20.1352A CRESTWOOD CONSTRUCTION 64.04 42.56 21.46 03/01/2005 21.46- 9.09.9416.1 CRESTWOOD CONSTRUCTION 86.74 47.69 $9.05 02/14/2005 46.57- 14,19.66711 CRIST, JERRY 73.11 40.37 32.74 - 03/01/2005 36.50- 7-40.0328.1 CULLUM, DAVID 92.02 51.93 40.09 - 02/28/2005 90.00- 15.21.2922.4 CUTLER, KIMBERLY 124.06 28.98 28.98 66.10 - 02/03/2005 65.00- 18.42.0434.1 DAHLGREN, SHIRLEY 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 02/22/2005 28.98- 3.03.5308.1 DALE HOMES 56.58 21.18 17.70 17.70 01/14/2005 56.86- 18.42.2388.2 DALY, BERT 108.73 35.29 39.05 34.39 01/04/2005 120.00- 14.14.3634.2 DANIELS, RICHARD & JOANNE 122.16 46.48 37.84 37.84 01118!2005 40.62- 15.21.1788.2 DAVENPORT, ANTHONY 133.66 54.23 79.43 - 03/07/2005 40.00- 18.42.2400.1 DAVIS, LEE W. 35.58 35.29 .29 03/08/2005 35.00- 15.15.$010.2 DE JONG, JEANETTE 103.00 36.50 66.50 02/0212005 91.79- 14.19.025B.2 DE YOUNG, JON & KAY 42.81 39.05 3.76 - 04/04/2005 39.05- 16.31.3002.3 DENKER, ERIN & JEFF 89,38 46.57 42.81 - 02/28/2005 96.90- 16.32.1330.1 DESPOT, CARRIE 29,43 28.98 .45 - 03/07/2005 36.05- 14.19.7326.2 DICK, MICHAEL & TIA 89.38 42.81 46.57 02/25/2005 88,08- 18.42.0428.3 DIEDERICH, SHERYL 57.96 28.98 28.98 01/31/2005 50,44- 6.06.1254.2 DITTMAN, AARON & JANALEE 45.47 44.53 .94 02/25/2005 33.87- 15.21.2804.3 DITTMAN, DREW 86.96 37.84 49.12 02/14/2005 41.60- 6,06. 10 12.2 1.60- 6,06.1012.2 DIXON, CRAIG 60.49 30.38 30.11 - 01126/2005 33.87- 17,34.1690.1 DOCKWEILER, THOMAS & TERF 88.04 44.02 44.02 03101/2005 55.30- 18.42.4202.1 DOUGHTY, KELLY 81.86 42.81 39.05 - 02/08/2005 85,62- 15.21.1942.2 DRIFKA, PATRICIA 35.40 17.70 17.70 - 02101/2005 79,26- 17.34.0398.1 DUNCAN, RICHARD 69.24 36.50 32.74 01/31/2005 85.10- 16.32.0856.1 DUPREE, LISA K 113.82 66.50 47.32 03/02/2005 52.00- 18.412396.4 DUVALL, KEN & PATTI 77.96 60.26 17.70 - 02108/2005 28,75- 17.85.0001.1 EAGLE SPRINGS INVESTMENT: 23.23 3.48 3.48 3.48 12.79 - 17,34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S. 74.34 39.05 35.29 - - 03/01/2005 115,62- 16.31.3034.1 EDWARDS, MARILYN 48.44 25.22 23.22 02103/2005 75.00 - 15.22.1502.2 EDWARDS, ROBERT 199.60 101.68 97.92 03/02/2005 98.86- 17.33.2558.1 EL-BAKRI KIMBERLY 95.56 44.02 51.54 02/22/2005 88.20- 18.42.4328.1 ELDRIDGE. PHILP & URQUICO, , 53.20 25.22 27.98 02/28/2005 29.00- 14.20.1978.1 ELLIOTT, JANE 104.74 56.70 48.04 03/07/2005 70.00- 8.08.1106.2 ELLIS, AMY 64.58 35.60 28.98 02/11/2005 32.74- 17.34.0592.1 ELLIS, TODD & DANA 56.74 42.81 13.93 03/14/2005 90.00- 3.03.5582.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 35.78 30.00 5.78 - 3,03.5708.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 143.14 93.26 49.88 03/01/2005 4.76- 3,0&5576.1 EQUITY BENEFITS 17.24 15.78 1.46 - 10.20.0248.1 EQUITY QUEST HOMES 10.10 6.96 3.14 - 16,32,1152.2 ESPINOLA, MIGUEL & MARGARI 71.20 36.50 34.70 02!2812005 20,00- 17.33.3678.1 0.00- 17.33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 3.03.5096.2 FEHER, A. & SCHMI 15.22.1768.2 FIELDS, SHARON HOPE 10.10.215B.1 FISHER CUSTOM HOMES 14.14.3516.2 FLORES, DAVID 8.08.5010.2 FOSTER, COREY 16,32,1366.4 FREDERICKS, PAUL 106.84 59.06 47.78 - 02111/2005 89.02- 8.08.0452.2 FRIES, NATHAN 83.14 31.36 27.77 24.01 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:40pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Oust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12120/2004 Date Amount 17.34.1088.2 FUCHS, DARRIN 74.54 44.02 30.52 - - 03/08/2005 50.00- 15.21.2980.2 FUNK, DEENA 112.93 77.64 35.29 - - 02/11/2005 91.01 - 17.34.0806.1 GABRIEL, RON 84.28 44.02 40.26 - 02!0812005 64.66- 15.22.2608.2 GALLOWAY, JERMAINE & KRISI 131.71 - - 15.89 115.82 11/02/2004 80.00- 15.21 .2038.1 0.00- 15.21.2038.1 GARCES, JAMES 42.81 39.05 3.76 - - 03/28/2005 39,05- 14.20.0430.2 GARCIA, STEVE & JULIA 38.94 17.70 17.70 3.54 - 15.22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 61.94 54.09 7.85 - 03/17/2005 50.00- 17.34.1906.1 GARDNER,MARLAJO 60,78 32.74 28.04 01/13/2005 90.00- 17.79.0326.2 GARMAN, SHAWN 76,76 32.74 44.02 02/07/2005 42.69- 17.33.2302.1 GARRARD, DALE 68.03 35.29 32.74 - - 03/10/2005 36.50- 16.31.0726.2 GARRETT, PHILLIP 51.81 24.01 27.77 .03 - 02/15/2005 26.96- 17.86.0010.2 GARRO PROPERTIES, INC. 128.27 - 5.97 10.82 111.48 10/07/2004 29.89- 18.42.2144.4 GEDDINGS, JIM & EILEEN 40.54 17.70 17.70 5.14 - - 8.08.0152.2 CENTER, SHARON 119.33 104.45 14.88 - - 02/25/2005 139.70- 17.86.0012.2 GERRANS, ROSEMARY & PECK 35.74 17.70 18.04 - - - 15.22.1596.4 GIAUQUE, PAUL 78.02 24.01 54.01 - 02/02/2005 137.49- 13.13.8446.3 GIBBS, JOSEPH & GAYLENE 131.78 51.45 80.33 02/02/2005 144.73- 16.31.3538.2 GILES,PATRICIA 49.37 28.98 20.39 02/25/2005 40.00- 10.20.0026.2 GILL, HANSJEET & AMARJEET 75.13 38.63 36.50 02/28/2005 76.60- 18.42.0366.1 GILLUM, DERICK & AMY 74.34 35.29 39.05 03/07/2005 35.29- 13.13.8444.2 GLASGOW, LLOYD & JUDI 92.19 51.93 40.26 02/08/2005 118,75- 15.22.1622.4 GOHR, DOUGLAS 179.79 136.98 42.81 03/01/2005 107,12- 3.15.0416.1 GOLD TREE 20.59 17.11 3.48 - 15.22.1754.2 GRAPATIN, JEREMY & EMILY 120.53 50.33 70.20 03/07/2005 50.00- 17.33,2752,1 GRAVES, DENNIS 84,28 44.02 40.26 02/24/2005 40.70- 15.21.1556.2 GREER, RANDY 79.30 27.77 51.53 - 02/28/2005 120.39- 17.34.0382.3 GRIMM, KEITH & DESTINY 94.86 36.50 47.78 10.58 02/2a12005 56.00- 15.21.1734.2 GROAT, STEPHANIE 140.59 61.61 78.98 - 02/24/2005 100,00- 17.33.4246.1 00.00- 17.33.4246.1 HELFERICH, ROGER 18.43.2448.4 HELP FUND 1, LLC 10.20.0270.2 HELP FUND 2 " in Msg column indicates no Notice CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:40pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01!2012005 12!2012004 Date Amount 10.20.0024.2 HELP FUND 2 LLC 123.20 32.37 54.01 24.01 12.81 02103/2005 40.69- 15,22.2526.2 HERBERT, WILLIAM [it 81.86 42.81 39.05 - - 02110/2005 61.61- 18.42.1862,2 HEWLETT, WILLIAM D 110.48 40.26 40.26 29.96 - 01/07/2005 50.00- 9.09,0210.3 HICE, LINDA 57.39 29.62 27,77 - - 02110/2005 65.68- 3.15,2619.1 HILTON, NICHOLAS & JAMIE 38.88 35,40 3,48 - 15.21.1128.2 HINSHAW, TONY 32.74 28.98 3.76 04/04/2005 28,98- 17.79.0914.2 HOLMES, KARL & LINDA 33.11 17.70 15.41 - 17.34.1506.3 HOLMES, KARL & LINDA 58.72 55.30 3.42 - - - 15.22.2334.2 HOLTZ, MARIANNE 35.40 17.70 17.70 - 02/15/2005 21.46- 14.20.1552.1 HOOK, ARTHUR L. 74.51 63.93 10.58 02/01/2005 35.00- 15.22.2130.3 HOUSEL, CHRISTIAN & TIANA 63.40 46.57 16.83 - 9.09.0197.1 HOWELL-MURDOCH DEV 584.38 577.42 6.96 02/01/2005 6.96- 18.42.1860.3 HUFFAKER, ROBERT 78.10 35.29 42.81 02/01/2005 78.31- 17.07.0209.2 HUGGINS, MARK 20.56 17.70 2.86 - 16.32.0904.3 HUGHES, GAIL & CLINT 63.06 31.53 31.53 02/10/2005 31.53- 15.15.0048.3 HUNTER, PAUL 83.34 44.02 39.32 03/02/2005 60.00- 16.31.3298.1 HUSON, DAVID SR 73.00 36.50 36.50 03/01/2005 44.02- 15.22A636.5 HUTCHINSON, GORDON & CAR, 61.05 21.46 21.46 18.13 - 10.10.1290.1 HYMAS, LAURIE 91.03 48.41 42.62 - 03/07/2005 43.00- 17.33.2754.1 INGOE, BRADLEY 78.10 39.05 39.05 03/03/2005 39.05- 8.15.0054.2 IVIE, RONALD & HOLLY 73.44 41.91 31.53 02128/2005 39.05- 17.34.0508.4 JACOBSSON, DAVID & DONNA 76.76 36.50 40.26 03/01/2005 40.26- 17.33.0370.1 JAMES COURT APT$ 349.74 218.11 131.63 03/15/2005 176.75- 16.32.1332.5 JAMES, SHEILA 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 02/01/2005 28.98- 14.19A630.2 JENKINS, LEROY 101.98 28.98 40.26 32.74 - 02/01/2005 93.28- 15.22.2530.2 JENNI, TERRY & KIM 142.53 - - - 142.53 10/05/2004 52.98- 15.21.2830.1 JESSEE, KEVIN 77.66 60.26 17.40 - 04/04/2005 90.00- 9.09.9012.2 JOHNS, CHARLES & TAMARA 100.72 56.70 44.02 02128/2005 59.06- 10.10.0086.2 JOHNSON, ALAN & GAIL 91.18 50.92 40.26 03/01/2005 40.26- 8.08.0208.2 JOHNSON, DEBBIE & JASON 73.11 40.37 32.74 - 02/01/2005 40.26- 18.42.0374.3 JOHNSON, DORTHY & REX 108.90 47.78 59.06 2.06 02/25/2005 75.00- 10,10.0676.2 JOHNSON, KEVIN & TIANA 38.99 21.29 17.70 - 02/08/2005 21.46- 16,42.2394.3 JOHNSON, LYNN 61.72 32.74 28.98 02/07/2005 83.46- 17,33.3600.1 JOHNSON, MICHAEL 41.02 36.50 4.52 - 03/22/2005 36.50- 17,34.3336.2 JOHNSON, RICHARD & MICHELI 89.36 46.57 42.81 - 01/31/2005 124.83- 14,19.0098.1 JOHNSON, SAMUEL 62.16 34.39 27.77 - - 02115/2005 60.12- 15,21.0095.1 JOHNSON, TIMOTHY 56.81 35.29 21.52 - - 03/07/2005 40.00- 3.90.0162.2 JOHNSTON, TRAVIS & JULIE 111.64 75.14 36.50 - 03/02/2005 70.26- 15.21.2840.1 JONES, LARRY 70.58 39.05 31.53 - 02115/2005 78.10- 16.32.1674.1 JONES, M JAY 61.72 32.74 28.98 03109/2005 36.98- 14.20.1988.1 JONES, SYLVIA 158.90 138.41 20.49 03102/2005 200.00- 10.20.0314.2 JORGENSEN, TOM & PATTY 107.90 62.00 45.90 03101/2005 51.00- 16.32.0522.2 JUHASZ, DON C. 78.98 44.02 34.96 03108/2005 65.00- 15.21 J3530.2 5.00- 15.21.0530.2 JUSTIN, TRACY 70.58 31.53 39.05 02/11/2005 70.58- 15.22.2092A KATHRYN BURNS REVOCABLE 76.76 40.26 36.50 02/20/2005 - 15.21.0028.2 KEENEY, DON 15.22.1514.2 KEHR, JOHN 17.33.2756.1 KELLER, KEVI 16.31.3312.3 KESSLER, NIC 18.42.1810.2 KESTER, ROB 14.20.1470.2 KIBBLE, HOWi 17.33.2704.2 KINDALL, DAV 15.22.0184.1 KING, KRISTY 17.34.3290.2 KOCH, JOSEP ., in Msg column indicates no YOFM Cust No 10.20.0228.2 KROMANN, DENNIS & IRMA 80.10 62.40 17.70 U3/02120U5 51.38 - 10.10.0062.3 KROMAR, BRIAN & KRISTA 69.68 38.15 31.53 02/08/2005 63.06- 16.31.0122.2 KUESTER, DUSTIN 100.52 64.02 36.50 - 03/01/2005 44.02- 14.14.5048.3 LAIN, MARTIN 81.60 62.81 18.79 - 03/10/2005 100.00- 18,42.4056.1 LAMOREAUX, KIM 86.69 39.05 46.57 1.07 - 03/18/2005 40,00- 15.21.0456.2 LASLEY, EGAN & ANN 59.30 27.77 31.53 - 02/09/2005 78,92- 15.21.1970.2 LAURENCE, PATRICK & ROBIN 102.11 31.53 24.01 46.57 01/18/2005 66,66- 8,08.5064.2 LAWHORN, JASON & WENDY 94.26 47.69 46.57 - 03/01/2005 88.40- 10A0.2322.2 LAYNE, DOUGLAS 92.95 53.67 39.28 - 02/25/2005 85.00- 1&22.1376,11 LEE, RANDOLPH 67.15 35.29 31.86 - 02/22/2005 50.00- 18.43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 70.58 31.53 39.05 - 03/02/2005 83.66- 18,42.2736.1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 51.41 35.29 16.12 - 03/22/2005 35.00- 17,33,2608.3 LEVICKI, MICHAEL 73.00 36.50 36.50 - 03/01/2005 36.50- 15.22.0328.1 LEWIS, JEFFREY 48.37 42.81 5.56 - 03/01/2005 91.34- 15.22.2178.2 LEWIS, LAWRENCE 74.34 35.29 39.05 - 02/25/2005 40.26- 8.08.5058.4 LIEU, TINA MARIA 40.76 37.90 2.86 - - 17.34.0656.3 LIM, YOUNG 54.20 32.74 21.46 - 02/09/2005 36.50- 6.06.9086.2 LIN, EUGENE 86.93 49.30 37.63 - - 01/24/2005 96.21- 17.33.3658.1 LINDSAY, LAURA 35.20 21.46 13.74 - 03/15/2005 35.00- 18.42.2520.1 LOCKYER, MERRIE 93.35 54.09 39.28 - 03/15/2005 60.00- 13.13.8556.2 LOGAN, NANCY 100.69 39.16 61.53 - 02103/2005 111.14- 15,21.1832.2 LOVAN, WALLACE II & KAROLEF 70.58 31.53 39.05 - 02107/2005 64.04- 15.213134.1 LOVE, JAMES & ELIZABETH 99.04 44.02 47.78 7.24 03101/2005 80.00- 17.33.2706.1 LOVELAND, JEREMY 60.39 25.22 28.98 6.19 02102/2005 80.00- 16.31.0432.3 LOWDER, MARK & ANGELA 141.46 89.06 52.40 - 03102!2005 100.00- 16.31.0780.4 LOWE, TAMMY 33.77 27.77 6.00 03/15/2005 60.30- 6.06.1492.2 LOWRY, ROBERT & DEBI 103.63 39.76 63.87 02/03/2005 124.01- 16.32.0510.2 LOYD, WOODY & JOY 96.82 65.29 31.53 - 03/0212005 77.12- 13.1&902,2 LUCAS, CATHERINE 57.06 28.08 28.98 - 02/22/2005 25.22- 16.32,1320.1 LUKE, SHELLIE M. 89.75 80,33 9.42 - 04/04/2005 70.00- 17.34,1986.3 LYNCH, JARAD & AHLERS, MAT 147.46 44.02 103.44 - 02/03/2005 114.36- 14.14.4428.2 MAKA, ANN 120.86 66.77 54.09 - 02/23/2005 65.37- 14.14.5028.2 MARGHEIM, JAMES 92.52 49.71 42.81 - 01/31/2005 46.57- 18.42.2332.1 MARIN, JOSE 89.38 42.81 46.57 - 02/15/2005 127.88- 3,18.0106.2 MARKHAM, PAUL & JAMIE 76.87 44.13 32.74 03/07/2005 77.58- 18.42.1206.1 MARTIN, LOREN 55.54 27.77 27.77 - - 02/25/2005 66.62 - 13.13.8930.2 MARTINEZ, RONNIE & TIFFANY 84.61 42.39 40.26 1.96 02/08/2005 79.54- 15,15.0005.2 MAUZY, JEFFREY & TIFFANI 66.82 31.53 35.29 02/22/2005 71.15- 14,20,1942,2 MAYATT, ANNA 55.37 31.36 24.01 - 03/01/2005 69.91- 15,22.2170.3 MCCLOUD, RYAN & WULFF, K. 74.34 39.05 35.29 - 02/01/2005 81.70- 16.31,0194.1 MCCLURE, HOLLY 75.68 37.64 37.84 - - 03/03/2005 37.84- 14,14,3554.2 MCKINLEY, JACQUELINE 69.85 40.37 29.46 - - 01/31/2005 36.00- 15,21,1158,3 MCKINLEY, JUNE 89.14 54.09 35.05 - 11123/2004 182.92- 8.81.0110.2 MCLARNEY, KATHRYN & PATRIi 17.33.2556.1 MCLEAN, BRANDON 17.33.0241.1 MDC LLC 15.21.1132.1 MELTON, GARY 17.33.2538.1 MENDOZA, GEORGE & ELIZABE 18.42.2422.2 MERCADO, RODERICK 3.03.5388.2 MERRILL, RICHARD W. 16.31.0494,2 MESZAROS, LILLI 14.19.7124.1 MEYERS. TROY & JIMI •. in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sen k 1' CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:41 pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 9.09.0130.2 MILLER, JAMES 98.46 42.92 35.29 20.25 - 01/13/2005 42,72- 14,19.0284.2 MILLER, PAULA & ALLAN 81.67 35.29 46.98 - - 02/28/2005 43.00- 18A3.0014.2 3.00-18.43.0014.2 MILLHOLLIN, JEFF & SARAH 91.80 47.78 44.02 02/08/2005 39.92- 16.31.0860.2 MILLS, DONOVAN 77.47 39.05 38.42 02/03/2005 88.00- 17.34.0934.1 MIRANDA, MARK A. 88.04 44.02 44.02 03/02/2005 47.78- 10.10.2246.2 MOIR, MIKE & ROBYN 95.95 55.69 40.26 02/25/2005 47-78- 14.20.1652.2 MOLEBASH, JOHN & MONICA 138.70 51.93 47.78 38.99 - 03/15/2005 20.00- 15,22,0210.1 MONAHAN, MICHAEL 165.10 47.70 17.70 21.46 78.24 11/10/2004 84.19- 17,34,1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 59.94 32.74 27.20 - - 02/28/2005 60.00- 15.22.1414.3 MOORE, ANNABELLE 55.54 27.77 27.77 - 02/01/2005 31-53- 9.09.9684.2 MOORE, MICHAEL & TONYA 84.35 45.47 30.32 8.56 - 6.06.9590.2 MORGAN LAUREL 4301 34.26 8.75 - 03/01/2005 60.00- 18.42.2774.5 MORIN, MICHAEL 113.39 39.05 39.05 35.29 02/01/2005 51.38- 13.13.4030.2 MORRIS, JEFFREY & BRENDA 87.42 50.92 36.50 - 03/10/2005 44.02- 8.08.1084.2 MORRIS, LANCE & MEGAN 101.05 54.48 46.57 02/09/2005 46.57- 14.19.1300.2 MORRIS, LAURA 29.97 - - - 29.97 05/28/2004 26.10- 18.42,2368.2 MORRIS, PAUL 124.67 39.05 39.05 46.57 - 02/28/2005 45.59- 15,21.3296.2 5.59-.15,21.3296.2 MORRISON, DWAYNE & VICKI 66.82 31.53 35.29 - - 02/08/2005 39.05- 18.42.1978.1 MORSE, DAVID & SHELLEY 46.32 25.22 21.10 - - 02/22/2005 61.00- 9.09.9266.2 MORTON, JAMES & STEFFANI 71.05 54.48 16.57 - 03/14/2005 30.00- 15.22.2550.2 MOSGROVE, RONNA & TOM 44.77 42.81 1.96 - 03/1512005 46.57- 17.34,0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 76.76 40.26 36.50 - 02/07/2005 85,26- 16.32.0650.2 MOWRY, CHARLOTTE 71.90 25.22 21.46 25.22 12/26/2004 57,96- 15.22.2614.2 MUNDELL, RANDY 61.72 28.98 32.74 - 02/01/2005 36.50- 14,19,7990.2 MUNKRES, MIKE 61.72 28.98 32.74 - 02/25/2005 65.48- 3,03.5864.2 MURPHY, MARCUS & JILL 73.42 38.15 35.27 - 01/21/2005 60.00- 8.08.1112.3 MURRAY, JASON & SARAH 58.24 54.48 3.76 - 03/30/2005 42.81- 18.42.1982.2 MURRAY, JAY & MELISSA 80.78 36.50 44.02 .26 02/11/2005 85.00- 17.33.0264.2 MUSGRAVE, JOHN & LOUISE 5.35 - - - 5.35 - 3.90.0006.2 MUSTIC, AMEL & JASMINA 73.11 44.13 28.98 - 02/10/2005 40.26- 9.92.7022.2 0.26-9.92.7022.2 NARDI, ANGELA 82.98 47.69 35.29 02/11/2005 118.40- 16.32.0630.3 NASKASHIMA, NAHO & KLOPFE 69.24 32.74 36.50 - 03/01/2005 73.82- 9.09.0274.2 NELSON, MARTIN E 120.96 42.92 39.05 $8.99 01/05/2005 156.00- 15.21.2874.3 NICHOLS, TINA 57.96 28.98 28.98 - 01/26/2005 109.18- 14.20.3022.1 NORTHSTAR CONSTRUCTION 39.16 21.46 17.70 - 02101/2005 17.70- 9.G9.0156.1 O.P.M. ENTERPRISES 87.19 47.43 39.76 03101/2005 80.00- 14.20.0692.3 OFFE, CHRIS & SUZANNE 57.96 25.22 32.74 - 02/15/2005 23.28- 17.34.2880.1 OHNSMAN, RICHARD 22.46 21.46 1.00 03/15/2005 24.22- 13.13.8816.2 OLIVER. SHELLI 53.35 49.71 3.64 - 04/05/2005 35.00- 14A4,35463 OLSON, BRYAN & RACHELLE 57.73 36.61 17.70 3.42 - 10.20.0240.1 ONSITE LLC 53.58 35.88 17.70 - 02/14/2005 35.40- 10.10,2434.2 OPP, ROBERT & DONALD 40.77 27.07 13.70 - - 16.32.1460.1 OSSURN, JODY 35.14 28.98 6.16 - 03/1112005 40,00- 13.13,9076.2 OTTER, CAROLYN 80.20 40.17 35.29 4.74 - 03/11/2005 35,29- 15.21.1432.2 OWSLEY, RICK & TERI 53.21 52.88 .33 - 03/21/2005 52,00- 3.03.5386.2 PALMER, NICK & NICOLE 77.88 45.14 32.74 02/20/2005 - 17.34.1230.1 PARENT, BEAU 40.78 36.50 4.28 03/11/2005 40.00- 16.32.1700.1 PASTIAN, BRYON 72.54 40.26 32.28 02/28/2005 70.00- 15.15.0524.1 PATTEE, RICHARD & ROSIE 93.14 42.81 50.33 03101/2005 61.59- 14,14.3580,2 1.59- 14.14.3580.2 PENDLETON, WES & PAULA 17.33.2308.1 PERRY, DIANNE 15.21.1560.2 PERSINGER, RANDY & PAUL 7.40.0236.3 PETERSON, JEAN & VAN .. in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:42pm Current Period: 04/0512005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/20/2005 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date Amount 16.32.0690.2 PETTERSON, KENNETH 65,48 $2.74 32.74 03101/2005 82.74- 8.08.0222.2 PIATT, WESTON & ANITA 95.27 52.49 42.81 02107/2005 42.81- 3,03.5276.2 2.81-3,03.5276.2 PIERCE, RUSSEL & MARY 74.12 41.38 32.74 02120/2005 - 15.21.0100.2 PIPPIN, LESIE & JEFF 55.54 31,53 24.01 - 02108/2005 27.77- 15.21.2604.1 PORTER, RODNEY 81.37 39,05 39,05 3.27 01/28/2005 60.00- 16.115.0043A PORTER, TAD & MICHELLE 115.62 42.81 72.81 - 02102/2005 104.59- 15.21,0078,11 POTRIDGE, GAIL 85.62 42.81 42.81 03/01/2005 40,98- 15.21.3062.1 POWELL, GREG & CATHERINE 368.36 143.12 225.24 - 03/02/2005 185.00- 17.34.1940.2 PRESLEY, ALLISON 130.46 32.74 58.98 38.74 - 02102/2005 75,00- 18,413,41101,11 PROPERTIES WEST 149.50 - - - 149.50 01/15/2003 3.48- 15.211.1720,11 PURVIS, BRETT J. 73.00 36.50 36.50 - 02109/2005 36.50- 17,34-11172,11 QUARNBERG, CARL & DOROTH 147.18 55.30 91.88 03/02/2005 60.00- 8.08.1322,3 QUILANTAN, ALEX & MARTHA 100.04 49.71 50.33 03/03/2005 93.14- 14,19,G570.1 RALPHS, ROD 76.76 36.50 40.26 02103/2005 76.76- 16,16.3001.1 RATCLIFFE INVESTMENTS 20.88 - - 20.88 - 15,22,2536,2 BEAGLES, ED & KELLIE 88.04 44.02 44.02 - - 02128/2005 51.54- 7.48.0132.1 REDSTAR CONSTRUCTION 61.59 35.40 21.73 4.46 - 16.32.1318.3 REEDER-GRAY, JULIE 227.16 122.98 104.18 - 02108/2005 70,34- 16.31.3390.2 REIF, JANELLE & HULL, JASON 73.00 36.50 36.50 02!2812005 23,30- 17.33.4578.1 RHINEHART, DOUG & MARY 61.81 35.29 26.52 - 03/09/2005 50,00- 18.42.3094.1 RHODES, JUSTIN 60.10 27.77 27.77 4.56 03101/2005 34.00- 8.80.0118.1 RICE, RANDY & COLLEEN 75.10 47.86 5.44 21.80 - 17,34.1182.1 RICHARDSON, MICHELLE L 54.20 28.98 25.22 - 02/01/2005 25.22- 3.15,2507.1 RIDGELINE 23.14 18.43 3.48 1.23 - 14.14.9D58.1 RIDGELINE 53.10 17.70 17.70 17.70 - 01/24/2005 17.70- 14.20.0022.2 RIMMER, DAVID 21.46 17.70 3.76 - 02/15/2005 17.70- 18.42.0310.3 RINKE, JOE & SMITH, RANDALL 78.43 42.81 35.62 - 03/09/2005 50.00 - 17.33.2580.2 ROBLES, IGNACIO 180.38 28.98 36.50 25.22 89.68 04/01/2005 28,95- 18.43.0328.2 RODIN, ADAM & HEATHER 108.18 57.85 50.33 - - 02/28/2005 61.61- 14A9.0336.1 RONG, MARY 85.62 42.81 42.81 02/15/2005 46.57- 15.15.0040.3 ROWLEY, RICHARD 58.69 48.98 9.71 02/07/2005 15.51- 7,40.0414.1 ROY, TED 56.05 30.83 25.22 - - 02/01/2005 40.26- 17.33.0128.1 ROYAL DYNASTY 578.45 7.55 7.55 7.55 555.80 06/08/2004 447.50- 10.20.0014.2 RUBEY, ARNOLD & KAY 33.20 26.34 6.86 - - 15.22.0914.1 RUCKER, JEAN 80.71 42.81 37.90 - 04/04/2005 50,00- 15.21.0112.2 RUMMLER, MATHEW 74.34 35.29 39.05 - 0212$12005 75,32- 13,13.6060,1 RUNGE, DUNCAN 115.54 64.00 51.54 - - 03/02/2005 81.54- 9,09.0404.2 SAFFERY, BRETT & KATELLA 100.35 38.63 32.74 28,98 - 01/25/2005 80.20- 14.14.5043.3 SARCO, BETTY 75.84 55.69 20.15 - - 03/14/2005 40.26- 18.42.2066A SAWAS, NAJI 89.38 46.57 42.81 - 03/01/2005 82.84- 3.03.5800.1 SAWTOOTH HOMES 38.88 21.18 17.70 - 02/28/2005 17.70- 18,42.2046.2 SAYLES, BRETT & JENNIFER 64.20 41.60 22.60 - - 03/01/2005 60.00- 15.22.1386,11 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 155.43 66.57 42.81 46.05 - 01/04/2005 116.00- 18.42.1140,3 SCHENCK, DEREK & KRISTINE 179.01 87.89 42.81 48.31 - 03/14/2005 42.81- 9,09,9102,2 SCHOFIELD, PAUL & HILARY 93.85 32.85 32.74 28.26 - 02/01/2005 40.00- 17.34.2144.2 SCHRANK, THOMAS 129.40 59.06 70.34 - 01/26/2005 163.48 - 18.42.4310.2 SCHRENK, MICHAEL & CARLA 99.32 47.78 51.54 02/15/2005 44.02- 17.34.3264.1 SCOTT, MIKE J. 84.28 40.26 44.02 02114/2005 47.78- 17.34.2760.4 SEALY, CANDYCE 110.60 51.54 59.06 03/01/2005 89.06- 7.48.0744.1 SELECT HOMES 10.30 7.94 2.36 - 10.20.0266.1 SHADOW MOUNTAIN CONSTRU 59.64 34.42 25.22 02/15/2005 17.70 - 18.42.3042.1 SHAMIM, YAMIR 53.77 46.57 7.20 02/11/2005 93.46- 14.20.3054.2 SHARP, LIZABETH 57.96 25.22 32.74 03/01/2005 94.34- 10,10,2014.2 SHEETS, RICK & HEIDI 90.86 50.60 40.26 02/01/2005 117.02- 18.42.2526.1 SHELTRON, ROGER 164.70 20.25 39.05 61.61 43.79 01/14/2005 44.77- *** 4.77-"` in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Nan-Delinq 02120/2005 01/20/2005 12!2012004 Date Amount 17.34.1178.2 SHERBURNE, BROOKE 54.20 25.22 28.98 - - 02[0812005 73.98- 8.85.4042.1 SHERVIK BUILDERS 28.39 22.16 6.23 - - - 3.90.0034.2 SHIMAJI, KRISTIN 28,57 22.30 6.27 - - 18.42.2496.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 70.58 35.29 35.29 - 02128/2005 78.10- 15,21.0208,11 SILSBY, TERRY 132.33 31.53 65.29 35.51 - 02!0212005 100.00- 16.31.3518.5 SILVA, JOE & DEBORAH 61.72 17.70 44.02 - 02/25/2005 47.78.- 15.21.2730.1 SILVESTRI, PAUL & SHANA 77.49 39.05 38.44 03/02/2005 37.00- 13,13.6054.2 SIMONI, NEIL & TERRYANN 50.28 49.71 .57 03/07/2005 31,53- 15,21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 150.72 71.60 79.12 - - 03/0712005 85.72- 17.34.0820.2 SITZLAR, RON 76.18 25.22 25.22 25.74 - 02/09/2005 35.00- 14.14.9048.3 SLACK, DAVID 84.28 36.50 47.78 - - 02/25/2005 44.02- 15.21.2168.2 SMITH, CONNIE 78.10 42.81 35.29 - - 02/03/2005 137.04- 9.09.0078.2 SMITH, MICHAEL & ASHLEY 82.98 47.69 35.29 - - 02/1012005 35.29- 15.21.1782.1 SMITH, PAUL 81.86 42.81 39.05 - - 02/2512005 54.09- 17.33.2296.1 SMITH, RONALD & MELISSA 95,56 44.02 51.54 - - 02128[2005 74.02- 15.21.0550.2 SMITH, TONI 31.54 31.53 .01 - - 0311512005 44.00- 16.15.0204.1 SPYGLASS HOMES 13.16 8.56 3.48 1.12 - - 7.40.0016.2 STALEY, HOLLY 68.86 68.26 .60 - 03/0212005 109.06- 15.21.0136.2 STARK, MIKE 76.18 35.29 35.29 5.60 01/1212005 61.22- 8.81.0111.2 STEELE, MICHAEL & SUSAN 55.43 42.30 13.13 - - 3.03.5286.2 STEPHENSON, BRANDON & MA 47.85 23.84 24.01 - 02/28/2005 81,70- 17.33.2572.3 STON, JOE 62.06 40.26 21.80 - - 03/01/2005 100.00- 18.42.3970.2 STORLIE, THERESA & SCOTT 50.44 28.98 21.46 - - 3.03.5540.2 STREHLOW, ERIC & KATHIE 56,69 21.29 17.70 17.70 - 18.42.1972.2 SWANSON, CORY & CASSANDF 62.70 32.74 29.96 - 03/01/2005 35.52- 18,42,2350.2 TADEVIC, GEORGE 49.38 42.81 6.57 03/07/2005 40,00- 6.06.9846.1 TALLMAN, ORRIN 45.29 26.46 18.83 02/14/2005 18.83 - 10.20.0198.2 TANNER, BRIAN & KRISTI 85.26 53.47 31.79 - 03/07/2005 50.00- 15.21.0578.1 THIBAULT, TED 81.86 39.05 42.81 02/25/2005 50.33- 13.13.8800.3 THOMPSON, DOUG 25.16 22.30 2.86 - - - 16.32.1558.4 THOMPSON, GARY 90.03 44.02 44.02 1.99 03/01/2005 92.59- 16.31.3514.3 THOMPSON, SCOTTIE & REBEK 87.26 44.02 43.24 - 02/23/2005 100.00 - 14.19.1364.2 THOMSEN, LORIE 70.58 31.53 39.05 02/02/2005 81.86- 8.08.1058.4 THRUPP, BRIAN 96.50 52.94 43.56 - 02/28/2005 52.00 - 15.21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 47.38 46.57 .81 03/17/2005 42,00- 10.10.2104.2 TODD, LESLIE & ANNEMARIE 117.42 77.16 40.26 03/03/2005 70,26- 9,09,0050.2 0.26- 9.09,0050.2 TRUCHOT, DARREN & CINDY 17.79.0207.2 TURCOTTE, TINAE 15.21.1174.1 TWADDLE, DAVID 10.20.0044.1 TWIN CREEKS CONSTRUCTION 8.08.1430.2 ULLAND 3.03.5154.1 UPLAND HOMES 16.32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CA 16.32.0444.1 WARNER, MICHAEL 15.21.0070.1 WAY, KELLY "" in Msg column indicates no Notice CITY OF MERIDIAN ( Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers Apr 05, 2005 04:43pm Current Period: 04/05/2005 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Gust No Name 15.21.3144.1 WEAVER, LARRY 18.42.2534.1 WEIRUM, KENNETH 15.21.1412.2 WEISWEAVER, CHARLES 8.15.0066.1 WESTROCK HOMES 15.21.2132.2 WHITLEY, JENNIFER 16.16.3508.2 WHITMIRE, SCOTT & SYN 10.55.2480.1 WHITNEY HOMES 15.21.1590.1 WHITTEN, DAVID 15.21.2184.2 WILSON, BRADLY 15.21.1092.1 WILSON, CHARLES & HILDA 3.90.0064.2 WILSON, LINDA & NATHAN 3.15.3801.1 WOLFE, BRANDON AND ZANE, 15.22,2110.3 WOOD, PHILLIP & MARY 15.21.1130.5 YASUDA, GARY & SHAWNA 10.20.0150.2 YEAGER, BRIAN 17.33.4250.1 YEAGER, ERIK Grand Totals: Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No () = (c} 880000001 Customer.Bill Cycle = 2 Last Pmt 01/20/2005 12/20/2004 Date CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of a Request for Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Drive - Through restaurant in a C -C Zone, by Sundance Investments (File No. CUP -04-056) For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 5, 2005 A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written notice mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property. The notice of public hearing before the City Council was posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code §67- 6509, The matter was duly considered by the City Council at the April 5, 2005, public hearing(s). The applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. b. Written and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records of the City CIerk (for written testimony) and in the official meeting minutes (for oral testimony). C. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and issued a written recommendation on the subject matter to the City Council. d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter. 2. Process Facts a. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code § 67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code § § I 1-'15-5 and I I -17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. Application and Property Facts a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the PIanning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby verified that the property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance of these findings is Sundance Investments. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -04-056 - PAGE 1 of 4 4. Required. Findings per Zoning Ordinance a. See Exhibit D for the findings required for this application. B. Conclusions of Law I . The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67- 6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 1 I and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Site Plan dated January 4, 2005 as shown in Exhibit B, and the Site Specific and. Standard Conditions as shown in Exhibit C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Site Plan as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan dated January 4, 2005 is hereby conditionally approved; and, 2. The Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibit C. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -04-056 - PAGE 2 of 4 1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the council. During this time, the permit holder must commence the use as permitted in accordance with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. In this context "structures" shall include sewer and water lines, streets or building construction. The applicant has specified in the application and to the commission and council a construction schedule and completion date for the project. If the completion date specified for the project is exceeded, the conditional use application shall become null and void. However, the applicant may submit an application for a time extension on the project for city council review. The application for time extension shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the deadline for completion of the project. For projects requiring platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one year from the original date of approval by the council. If the successive phases are not submitted within one year intervals, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. (MCC 11-17-4.B.) E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Exhibits Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Approved Site Plan Exhibit C. Site Specific and Standard Conditions Exhibit D: Conditional Use Permit Findings CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -04-056 - PAGE 3 of 4 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 01N day of Ann,\ .. 12005. COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED_6 MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) de weerd—, Attest:SUL a William G. Berg, Jr., C Clem R .y Copy served upon Applicant, The Pla% ing Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:, Dated.: City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP-04-056 - PAGE 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Jade Plaza Drive Thru CUP CUP -04-056 Legal Description TEALEY'S LAND R� - SURVEYING f2OO) 305-0636 H — Fax j2os) 385-0696 Project No 2815 Date: April 5, 2006 DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL "A" JADEPLAZA A parcel of land consisting of portion of Lois I and 2 of Black I of Ssiverstone Campus Subdivision as on file in Book 89 of Plats at Pages 10295 through 10299 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being situated in the NW 1A of Section 21, T 3N, R I E., B M, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows. BEGINNING at an iron pin marking the Northwest comer of said Lot 1, thence afong the North line of said Lot I South 69'14'25" East 279.3E feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 44'30'34" East 28.15 feet to an iron pin on the East line of said Lot 1, thence along said East line of Lot 1 South 00*13116" West 186.37 feet to an iron pin, thence leaving said Cast line along a line parallel with the South line of said Lot I North 89"58'50" West 41,32 feet to an iron pin; thence at right angles South 00'01'10" West 33-50 feet to an iron pin; thence at right angles North 89'58'50" West 134 21 feet to an iron pin; thence South 52'06'00" West 69:51 feet to an iron Pin On the Southwest line of said Lot 2; thence along said Southwest Ifne and the Southwest fine of said Lot I North 37'54'00" West 111.90 feet to an iron pin marking an angle point in the Wasterty boundary of said Lot 1: thence along the West line of said Lot 1 Norlh 00'13'16" East 197-99 feet to the POINT OF BEG NNING, Said Parcel Contains 71,778 Square Feet (1.648 Acres), more or less, EXHIBIT B Jade Plaza Drive Thru CUP CUP -04-056 Approved Site Plan EXHIBIT C Jade Plaza Drive Thru CUP CUP-04-056 Site Specific and Standard Conditions SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING & ZONING (P&Z) / PUBLIC WORKS 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all applicable conditions of approval from the Silverstone Corporate Campus Subdivision (CU-03-044, PP- 03-018 FP-04-016). 2. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in MCC 11-17-4.13. 3. All parking stalls drive aisles and drive-thru lanes shall be constructed per the dimensions depicted on the submitted site plans and MCC. 4. All parking and drive aisles shall be paved for all uses, in compliance with the submitted plans. Handicap parking spaces shall be signed and striped in compliance with Federal accessibility guidelines. 5. The project shall provide cross-access to the south, as depicted on the site plan. 6. Sanitary sewer and water service shall be from service lines currently installed adjacent to the property. 7. All exterior lighting, whether attached to the building or located within the parking lot, shall be down-shielded or otherwise altered so that the light does not spill over onto adjacent properties or right-of-way. All parking lot lighting shall be in accordance with Ordinance I 1-13-4C. 8. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in this report and Section. 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage is subject to review and shall require separate permits. 9. All construction and site improvements shall confonn to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the adopted building and fire codes. 10. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. 11. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and including a 100 -year storm event. 12. Certificate of Occupancy: All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall limit landscaping shrubs and bushes to species that do not exceed three feet in height around the drive through and ATM. Please coordinate the planting with Chief Musser prior to submitting for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, 2. Passive lighting should be used to ensure that all. public areas are well -lit and visible during evening hours. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant locations with the Fire Marshall, Joe Silva, prior to submitting for a Certificate of Occupancy (CZC). Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. C. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted reel 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners. f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. 3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 4. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. 5. Building setbacks shall be per the Building Code for one and two story construction. 6. Fire lanes and streets shall have a vertical clearance of 1.3'6". This includes mature landscaping. 7. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire -flow consistent with the Uniform Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 300' apart. 8. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 1. The Site was originally approved with Silverstone Business Campus MPP-03- 018/MCUP-03-044/MAZ-03-016, The same Conditions and Requirements also apply to MCUP-04-056. 2. A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a. building permit. Contact ACRD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1. If all storm drainage is retained on-site there will be no impact on Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District and no further review will be required. 2. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. 3. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. 4. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all development within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. E EXHIBIT D Jade Plaza Drive Through CUP CUP -04-056 Conditional Use Permit Findings The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in teems of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (I 1- 17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; Staff finds that the subject property, as depicted, is large enough to accommodate the required open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features required by the ordinance. Parking stalls are required at the ratio of one space per 200 s.£ of gross floor area. The building (13,513 sJ) requires 68 parking spaces; 74 spaces are proposed with three additional Handicap Accessible spaces. B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Mixed Use -Regional" and it is currently zoned C -C. Mixed Use -:Regional allows for retail and restaurants and drive-through facilities (see Comprehensive Plan, p. 98). Ordinance 11-8-1, Schedule of Use Control, allows for drive-in establishments through the conditional use process in the C -C zone. The Development Agreement for the subdivision also allows for drive-through projects through the conditional use process. Staff finds that the requested uses are in compliance with the approved Future Land Use Map and that if approved as a CUP the project will be in compliance with the MCC. C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; The abutting properties to the south and west are part of the Silverstone Campus and are intended for development of a similar nature. Properties across Jade Avenue and Silverstone Way to the east are in Silverstone and are also being developed in a similar fashion. The existing rural residence across Overland Road from the project will experience a change from existing conditions; r however, the Comprehensive Plan shows that the future intended land use of the area is designated Low Density Residential. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed development will not adversely change the existing or intended character of the general vicinity; the decision to change the character of the area was already made with the approval of Silverstone Business Campus Subdivisions. D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; The adjoining property to the south is owned by the same property owner that has consented to submittal of this application. Therefore, staff does not anticipate that the proposed use will adversely affect adjacent properties. The Commission and Council should rely upon public testimony to determine if the development will adversely affect the other property in the vicinity. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; The project has vehicular access from Silverstone Way and Jade Avenue via Overland Road a previously approved curb cut for Silverstone Corporate Campus Subdivision. ACHD approved the proposed project with no new conditions, except to comply with the conditions already placed on the subdivision. Water and sanitary sewer service to the project is readily available to the site via mains installed as part of the subdivision improvements. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; If approved, the developer will finance the extension of sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. The primary public costs to serve the future residents will be fire and police services. Staff finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; No new trip generation estimates were provided by ACHD, since estimates for the entire subdivision were approved previously when it was subdivided. Staff finds that no excessive traffic, smoke, fumes, glare or odors will result from the proposed use. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; All vehicular approaches were previously approved with Silverstone Corporate Campus Subdivision. Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with traffic on the surrounding public streets. ACHD will not prepare a separate site-specific report for the proposed project and instead have simply required the project to comply with conditions of approval already placed on the subdivision as a whole. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Staff finds that no natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by issuance of this conditional use. The Eight -Mile Creek lies upon this site and was addressed in the development of Silverstone Corporate Campus Subdivision, The 10' multiuse pathway along Eight Mile Creek shall be maintained as previously approved. r €, ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT AS OF APR \07 '05 23:16 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN 11 DATE 04/07 TIME 22:47 TO/FROM PUBLIC WORKS MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 12 04/07 22:48 8841159 EC --S 00'39" 002 235 OK 13 04/07 22:49 2086840744 EC --S EC ---S 00'39" 002 235 OK 14 04/07 22:50 POLICE DEPT EC --S 00'40" 002 00'40" 002 235 OK 15 04/07 22:51 8985501 EC --S 00'38" 002 235 235 OK 16 17 04/07 04/07 22:52 22:54 LIBRARRY IDAHO STATESMAN EC --S 00'48" 002 235 OK OK 18 04/07 22:55 3886924 EC --S 00'40" 002 235 OK 19 04/07 22:56 P -AND --Z EC --S 00'39" 002 235 OK 20 04/07 22:57 208 895 0390 EC --S EC --S 00040" 002 235 OK 21 04/07 22:59 128300040 G3 --S 00'39" 002 00'50" 002 235 OK 22 23 04/07 23:00 208 387 6393 EC --S 00'39" 002 235 235 OK 24 04/07 04/07 23:01 23:03 ADA CTY DEVELMT 8BB5052 EC --S 00'51" 002 235 OK OK 25 04/07 23:04 CHERRY LANE EC --S G3 --S 00'38" 002 235 OK 26 04/07 23:05 CHERRY LANE G3 --S 00'01" 000 00'02" 000 235 INC 27 28 04/07 23:05 CHERRY LANE G3 --S 00'35" 000 235 235 INC INC 29 04/07 04/07 23:07 CHERRY LANE 23:08 IDAHO ATHLETIC G3 ---S 00'34" 000 235 INC 30 04/07 23:09 C ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC --S EC --S 00'39" 002 00'39" 235 OK 31 04/07 23:11 2088886701 EC --S 002 00'38" 002 235 OK 32 04/07 23:15 3810160 EC --S 01'03" 002 235 235 OK OK ------------ - THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY F, L uL se- C, i �j CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Thursday, April 7, 2405 at 7:00 P.M. City Council Chambers 1• Roll -call Attendance: — C _ Keith Borup Wendy Newton-Huckabay DaviJ Moe Michael Rohm Chairman David Zaremba 2. Adoption of the Agenda:�ro� 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 3, 2005 Planning and Zoninn f Arnk'nie.—G...., na_— i'— ** TX CONFIRMAIION REPORT ** AS OF APR 04 '85 19:27 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FRCM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD4 STATUS 29 04/04 19.24 CHERRY LANE G3 --S 00'01" 000 196 INC 30 04/04 19:25 CHERRY LANE G3 --S 00'34" 000 196 INC 31 04/04 19:26 CHERRY LANE 63---S 00`01" 000 195 INC 32 04/04 19:27 CHERRY LANE 63--S 08101" 008 196 INC THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE -COUNCIL METING AGENDA Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 5;30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll -call Attendance: Shaun Wardle Christine Donnell Charlie Rountree Keith Bird Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Discussion of Assignment of Golf Course Lease with Presentation by the Proposed New Operator: (*45 minutes) 4. Communities in Motion Presentation by Brad Hawkins -Claris. (*20 minutes) *Approximate allowable time set for agenda Item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Pre -Council Agenda — April 5, 2005 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings sh211 become property of the City of Meridian, Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. i ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT * AS OF APR 04 '05 10:45 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD4 STATUS 02 04/04 10:43 2083850696 EC ---S 01'19" 004 189 OK AAA COUNTY RECORDER J, DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT .00 4 BOISE IDAHO 03131106 09:06 Phi EBonnie r6il]Ig R�!� ]jj{'�Ei 1111�11I1��(I'Ii11I I111I� ECORDCORDED-REOUEST OF ! i11E 1i it 1111 Il lilE 9111! Maridian City 105038561 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. ,4 15—"` 4-6 6 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, W.A RDLE A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE GOLF COURSE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 44, 4S, 46 & 47 BLOCK OF SPURWING SUBDIVISION WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHINDEN BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 5/ MILE WEST OF N. LINDER ROAD, IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 22 & 23, TAN, R.1W BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on March 8, 2005, the City Council of Meridian, held a hearing on the vacation of a portion of the golf course easement located on Lots 44, 45, 46 & 47, Block 1 of Spurwing Subdivision which is located on the North Side of Chinden Boulevard, approximately % mile west of N. binder Road, in portions of Section 22 & 23, TAN, R. IN Boise Meridian, Ada County Idaho.; and WHEREAS, after such hearing, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said described vacation; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section, 1. That a portion of the golf course easement located on Lots 44, 45, 46 & 47, Block I of Spurwing Subdivision which is located on the North Side of Chinden Boulevard, approximately 1/ Haile west of N. hinder Road, in portions of Section 22 & 23, TAN, R. IN, Boise Meridian, Ada County Idaho; is hereby vacated. Copies of the necessary relinquishments are attached as Exhibit "A'. Seetioa 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. VACATION OF GOLF COURSE EASEMENT- SPURWING SUBDIVISION — Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of a Request for Conditional Use Permit Approval for a 3,477 Square -Foot Drive -Through Credit Union in a C -C Zone, by Westmark Credit Union Case No(s): CUP -05-003 For the City Council Hearing Date of. April 5, 2005 A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written .notice mailed. to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property. The notice of public hearing before the City Council was posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code §67- 6509. The matter was duly considered by the City Council at the April 5, 2005, public hearing(s). The applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. b. Written and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records of the City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the official meeting minutes (for oral testimony). C. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and issued a written recommnendation on the subject matter to the City Council. d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and. duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter. 2. Process Facts a. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. Application and Property Facts a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -05-003 - PAGE I of verified that the property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance of these findings is Westmark Credit Union. 4. Required. Findings per Zoning Ordinance a. See Exhibit D for the findings required for this application. B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67- 6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the goverrnnental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Site Plan dated January 6, 2005 as shown in Exhibit B, and the Site Specific and Standard Conditions as shown in Exhibit C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Site Plan as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan dated January 6, 2005 is hereby conditionally approved; and, CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -05-003 - PAGE 2 of 4 2. The Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibit C. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits 1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Penmit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the council. During this time, the permit holder must commence the use as permitted in accordance with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. In this context "structures" shall include sewer and water lines, streets or building construction. The applicant has specified in the application and to the commission and council a construction schedule and completion date for the project. If the completion date specified for the project is exceeded, the conditional use application shall become null and void. However, the applicant may submit an application for a time extension on the project for city council review. The application for time extension shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the deadline for completion of the project. For projects requiring platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one year from the original date of approval by the council. If the successive phases are not submitted within one year intervals, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. (MCC 11-17-4.B.) E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Tapings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please tape notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code, F. Exhibits Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Approved Site Plan Exhibit C: Site Specific and Standard Conditions CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -05-003 - PAGE 3 of 4 Exhibit D: Conditional Use Pennit Findings By ac 'on of the City Council at its regular meeting held on. the day of YqVriZ 2005. COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE VOTED_�� COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED' (TIE BREAKER) C- r Attest: SNAL William G. Berg, Jr., City ler Copy served upon Applicant, The Planning anDepartment, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:Dated: - 11::05 City4ClersO fice CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP -05-003 - PAGE 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Westmark Credit Union CUP -05-003 Legal Description �ti-t��-cEitt� 11:3^ 1 EXHIBIT A PARCEL "Ti" Iid SILVERSTONE SUBDrt'ISTON A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 8 of Block I of Silverstone Subdivwon as on file in Dunk 83 of plats at Pages 9242 through 9246 in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho as shown ort Rtcotd of Survey No. 5916 on rile in said office of the Ada County Recorder, "id parcel being sinusted in the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 21. Township 3 North, Range I Fust, Eloise Meridian, Meridian, .oda County, Idaho and mora particularly described as follows: Commencing at an iron pin marking dee Northwest corner of said Lot 8; 'thence aloft, the West litre of said Lot 8 South 00 degrees 14'5(Y* West 197 50 feet to an iron pin marking The point of beginning; Tbe.uce leaving said West line at right angles South 39 degrees 4$'l 0" East 138.17 feet to an iron Pin' Thence South 44 degrees 47'25" East 119.07 feet to 311 iron pill on a curve; Thtnee along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet, a central angle of 18 degrers 46'20 a length of 65.53 feet and a long chord that bears South 14 degrees 17'01" West 65.24 feet to ata iron pin trtarkiilg a point of rewtse curvature; Thence alotetg the arc of a carve to the right leaving a radios of 60 00 feet, a central angle of 53 dcgFrces 2 ['00", a length of 87.28 feet and a long chord that bears South 48 degrees 34'20" West 79.79 feet to an icon pin marking a point of tangency; Thence North R9 degrees 45'10" West 149.80 feet to un iron pin on said West line of Lot 8, Thence along said West line North 40 degrees 14'50" Enst fr?.99 feet to nn iron grin; Thence continuing North 02 degrees 4©'41" ;wast 117.89 feet to an iron pin. Thence continuing Notch 00 degrees 14'50" East 19 12 feet to the point of beginning;, EXHIBIT B Westmark Credit Union CUP -05-003 Approved Site Plan MW RRM'al PACUTY FCR WEMMARK LCREDIT UNION MM",MA110 I j L, L I Wm�t� rmr7 F, MW RRM'al PACUTY FCR WEMMARK LCREDIT UNION MM",MA110 I EXHIBIT C Westmark Credit Union CUP -05-003 Site Specific and Standard Conditions SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CUP) 1. All conditions of thereviousl p y approved Silverstone Corporate Center, AZ -01- 001, CUP -01-002, PP -01-001, and. FP -01-01.9 shall also be considered conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP -05-003) application. 2. To facilitate correct traffic flow movements, directional signs shall be installed in the landscape planters as shown on the site plan. A sign reading "Exit Only," "Wrong Way," or a similar cautionary statement should be installed at the western driveway. Other than the directional signs listed above, no signs are approved with this application. All wall and free-standing signs require a separate permit. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 3. Provide the building address numbers on the top of the pylon. facing Eagle Road. Please contact Joe Silva (888-1234) for further information regarding this condition and the size of the numbering/lettering. The landscape plan prepared by Harvest Designs, P.C., labeled LS -1, and dated 1- 7-05, is approved with the following changes/notes: • In accordance with MCC 12-13-7-3, all woody shrubs must be from a minimum 2 gallon pot (1 gallon shown within the planting schedule for some shrubs); • Construct a 5 -foot wide north -south concrete walk through the landscape planter on the north side of the northern parking stalls (approximately between parking stalls 20 & 22); • The proposed screen wall (for mechanical condensers, electrical/gas metering, irrigation controls, etc.) on the north side of the building shall be no taller than 8 -feet; and, • An underground, pressurized irrigation system shall be installed to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with MCC 12-13-8 and MCC 9-1-2. The site plan prepared by ZGA Architects, labeled Al. 1, and dated 1-6-05, is approved as submitted with the changes listed in this staff report. The number and size of the off-street parking stalls is approved as shown on the submitted site plan. 6. Comply with the conditions and comments of all City Departments, and other agencies. 7. No additional buildings or other structures shall be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered, nor shall any building structure or land be established or change in use on this site without first obtaining a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) from the Meridian Planning and Zoning Department (MCC 11-19-1). 8. All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 11.0% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. Any temporary occupancy will not exceed 60 days to complete the required improvements. 9. If construction has not begun within 18 months of City Council approval, a new conditional use permit must be obtained prior to the start of development. 10. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in such a manner as to eliminate glare and illumination of the adjoining roadways and properties, in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 1.1. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 12. Applicant's (or successor's) failure to comply with any of the terms of approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of the conditional use permit. OTHER AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY 1. Please contact Bill Gregory at SSC (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal and submit stamped (approved) plans with your certificate of zoning compliance application. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. 2. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %2" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. C. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. F d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. f Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. g. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. 3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside radius. 4. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction is brought on site. 5. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire -flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D. 6. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within 1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities. 7. Provide a Knoxbox entry system for the complex prior to occupancy. 8. The Fire Dept. has concerns about the ability to address the project and have the addresses visible from the street which the project is addressed off of Please contact Joe Silva (888-1234) to address this concern prior to the public hearing. 9. Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire Codes. 10. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 1. On March 14, 2001, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on: • Silverstone Corporate Center/ MPP-0I-OOI/MCUP-01-002/MAZ-01-001. The same Conditions and Requirements also apply to MCUP-05-003. 2. A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1. If all storm drainage is retained on-site there will be no impact on Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District and no further review will be required. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all development within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. EXHIBIT D Westmark Credit Union CUP -05-003 Conditional Use Permit Findings The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11- 17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parldng, landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; The proposed site plan shows three drive-through lanes on the west side of the proposed building. There is a 14 -foot wide escape lane west of the drive-through lanes. The three drive-through lanes are covered by a 1,211 square -foot canopy. City Council is supportive of the layout for the proposed drive-through lanes and proposed traffic flow pattern for this lot, as stacking vehicles should not interfere with internal traffic flows or traffic flows on the adjacent shared driveways or Eagle Road. To further prevent vehicles from entering the drive-through from the wrong direction (north), the applicant is proposing directional signs for the traveling public. See Site Specific Condition. #2. Parking stalls are required at the ratio of one space per 200 square -feet of gross floor area for financial institutions (MCC 11-13-5.B). Per this requirement, 17 stalls are required. There are 25 parking stalls provided on this site, 12 standard stalls, 12 compact stalls, and 1 accessible stall. This provision exceeds the City's minimum. parking stall ratio. City Council finds that the project should have ample parking, and is supportive of the applicant's request to construct 12 compact stalls on the north side of the site. There is an existing 35 -foot wide landscape easement/buffer along Eagle Road. Landscaping within this buffer was constructed with Silverstone Subdivision. The applicant is proposing 4,342 square -feet of additional internal landscaping (12% of the site) All proposed building setbacks and landscaping meet the minimum standards outlined in Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code. City Council finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the required yards (setbacks), open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features required by the ordinance. f That the proposed use and development plan will. be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Mixed Use - Regional." This designation is intended to "provide for a combination of compatible land uses that are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan. The purpose of this designation is to identify key areas which are either infill in nature or situated in highly visible or transitioning areas of the city where innovative and flexible design opportunities are encouraged." This site was part of the larger Silverstone campus plan, which is located in a highly visible and rapidly transitioning part of the city. The proposed use is compatible with the other commercial/office uses approved in this area. MCC 11-8-1, Schedule of Use Control, allows for drive-through establishments through the conditional use process in the C -C zone. City Council finds that the requested credit union with a drive-through is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and that if approved as a CUP the project will be in compliance with Meridian City Ordinances. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use win not adversely change the essential character of the same area; City Council is generally supportive of the site plan design. This area is part of a larger mixed-use commercial area, which City Council believes the applicant has designed to accommodate. City Council believes that a drive-through credit union will be compatible with other uses/buildings in the area. There is a significant amount of landscaping being provided (approximately 12% of the gross land area), and the proposed use is consistent with the previously approved uses within Silverstone Subdivision. City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the general design, construction, operation, and maintenance should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area. D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed drive-through use will not adversely affect other property in the area. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Sanitary sewer and water are currently provided to the subject site. The Ada County Highway District Board of Commissioners previously acted on the Silverstone Subdivision applications. The conditions, requirements and restrictions for Silverstone Subdivision also apply to CUP -05-003. On February 11, 2005, a joint agency/department comments meeting was held with representatives of key service providers to this property. Based on the joint agency/department meeting and other comments received from other agencies/departments, City Council finds that the public services listed above can be made available to accommodate the proposed use. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; If approved, the applicant will be financing any improvements required for development. City Council finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and. that the proposed zoning and subsequent development will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; City Council recognizes that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of a drive-through in this location; however, City Council does not believe that the amount generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. City Council does not anticipate the proposed use will create excessive noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. City Council funds that the proposed drive-through use will not be detrimental to people, property or the general welfare of the area. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; The applicant is proposing to utilize two driveways off of the existing "spine" driveway that connects Eagle and Overland Roads. The only entrance into the site is shared with the property to the north, and is located at the northern property line. The second driveway off of the spine driveway is restricted to vehicles exiting the site. This driveway is located approximately 65-feet east of Eagle Road. ACHD considers vehicular approaches in their analysis of projects and has previously approved the spine driveway access points to the public roadway system (Eagle Road & Overland Road). Because the vehicular access points into this site are from a private driveway, the ACRD has not provided detailed analysis of their location. City Council does not believe that the proposed. vehicular approaches will interfere with the traffic on the spine driveway or the public streets. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. City Council is unaware of any natural of scenic features of major importance on this site and finds that no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or damaged by approving the annexation and zoning application. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Heritage Commons Subdivision Amended Preliminary Plat of Twenty Seven (27) Residential Lots to on 4.53 Acres in a R -SPD Zone by Brighton Investments. (File #PP -05-005) For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 5 2005 A. Findings of Fact I. Hearing Facts a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the City Council public hearing, the First publication appearing and written notice mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property. The notice of public hearing before the City Council was posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code §67- 6509. The matter was duly considered by the City Council at the March 3, 2005, public hearing(s). The applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express comments and subunit evidence. b. Written and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected. in the records of the City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the official meeting minutes (for oral testimony). C. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and issued a written recommendation on the subject matter to the City Council. d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter. 2. Process Facts a. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. Application and Property Facts a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). PP -05-005 - PAGE I of 4 verified that the property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance of these findings are Brighton Investments, LLC 4. Required Findings per Zoning and. Subdivision Ordinance a. See Exhibit C for the required findings. B. Conclusions of Law I . The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67- 6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Preliminary Plat dated. January 2005 as shown in Exhibit B and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit C. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced by having submitted the Preliminary Plat dated January 2005 is hereby conditionally approved; and 2. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in Exhibit C. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). PP -05-005 - PAGE 2 of 4 D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits 1. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, the owner or developer shall have one year within which to file the request for approval of the final plat. After approval of final plat, the owner or developer shall have one year to begin construction of the public utilities and one year thereafter to complete construction of those public facilities. (MCC 12-2-43 & C.) E. Notice of Final Action. and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Exhibits Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Approved Preliminary Plat Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval Exhibit D: Plat Findings By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of rl i , 2005. COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE VOTED L,�o, COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). PP -05-005 - PAGE 3 of 4 COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Attest: ° M.b. "w Wil iarn G. Berg, Jr., ciffy COW I f '= Iry Copy served upon Applicant, TIb�I �3w'ng Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. BY CDated: ity Clerk's ffice CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). PP -05-005 - PAGE 4 of EXHIBIT A Heritage Commons Amended Subdivision PP -05-005 Legal Description �engineering North West, LLC 423 N. Ancestor Place, Suite t80 Boise, Idaho 83704 (208) 376-5000 •- Fax (208) 376-3556 Project No. 04-043-01 Date. January 11, 2005 HERITAGE CONDVIONS PHASE 2 PRELMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 114 of Section 31, T. 4 N., R. I E., B.JYT., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section comer common to Sections 31 and 32 of said T. 4 X, R. I and Sections 5 and 6 of T. 3 N., R. I E., B,M.; Thence North 00°31'35" East, 2659.04 feet on the section line common to said Sections 31 and 32, to the 1/4 section corner common to said Sections 31 and 32; Thence North 89'46'20" West, 464.43 feet on the east -west mid-section line of said Section 31 to the REAL POINT OF BEGENNLNG: Thence leaving said mid-section line, South 00'30'18" West, 308.40 fact to a point on the northerly boundary line Of Quenzer Commons Subdivision No, 1, as same is shown on the Plat thereof recorded in Book 85 of Plats at Page 9511 of Ada County Records; Thence on the northerly boundary line of said Quenzer Commons Subdivision No. I for the following courses and distances: Thence North 89'46'20" West, 50.00 feet; Thence South 00'30'17" West, 12.54 feet; Thence North 89'46'20" West, 500.65 feet; Thence South 78°11'12" West, 50.04 feet to the northeast comer of Lot 5, Block I1 of said Quenzer Commons Subdivision No. 1; Thence leaving the northerly boundary line of said Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.1, 265.90 feet on the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 1901.21 feet, a central angle of 08*00'48" and a chord distance of 265.68 feet which bears North 13*36'48" West; Thence North 68'38'14" East, 160.21 feet to a point of curve; Thence 46.30 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 391.26 feet, a central angle of 0604646" and a chord distance of 46?7 feet which bears North 72°01'37" East to a point on the east -west mid-section line of said Section 31; Thence South 89946'20" East, 471.77 feet on said raid -section line to the real point of beginning. Said parcel contains 4.53 acres more or less. PREPARED BY - Engineering North West, LLC 7880 :� James R. Washburn, PLS EXHIBIT B Heritage Commons Amended Subdivision PP -05-005 Approved Preliminary Plat EXHIBIT C Heritage Commons Amended Subdivision PP-05-005 Site Specific and Standard Comments SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS---PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant shall maintain compliance with existing development agreement for Heritage Commons Subdivision, PP-02-007 and all applicable conditions of approval for the lots. PRELIMINARY 1 FINAL PLAT SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be from service line extensions from existing and proposed mains adjacent to the project. Subdivision designer to coordinate service sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. This development shall be subject to latecomer fees, to reimburse those responsible for bringing sanitary sewer service to the area. Latecomer's fees shall be due and payable prior to signature on the final plat for each phase. 2. Water service to this site will be from main Iine extensions from existing water mains in Quenzer Commons Subdivision #1. The applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 3. A detailed fencing and landscape plan, in compliance with MCC 12-13, shall. be submitted with the final plat application. 4. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed, unless deemed unnecessary by the City Arborist per Ordinance 12-13-13. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. The applicant shall submit a tree removal/preservation plan at least 10 days prior to the City Council hearing. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into a surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. 6. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all stones up to and including a 100 -year stone event. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. 7. The applicant has indicated that Settlers Irrigation District will own and .maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the municipal water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I . Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 2. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. 3. Two -hundred -fifty -watt, high-pressure sodium, streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Show all existing and proposed easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development. 5. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-5. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 6. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks throughout development in accordance with City Ordinance. 7. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire -flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500' apart. International Fire Code Appendix C 2. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. g. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. h. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the TFC Section 509.5. 3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside radius. 4. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. 5. Building setbacks shall be per the International Building Code for one and two story construction. 6. The proposed 27 -lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a total estimated population of 79 residents at build out. 7. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). ACRD CONDITIONS 1. Remove the alley that runs between Heritage Park Way and Heritage Woods Avenue between Block 5 and 6, as proposed. 2. Construct a new 16 -foot wide paved alley within 20 -feet of right-of-way between the existing alley, Leighfield Drive, Block 27 and Block 28. Dedicate clear title to the right-of-way and the improve the right of way by paving the full width and length of the right-of-way; provided, that the minimum width of the right-of-way is 16 -feet and the homeowners association has obtained a license agreement with the district authorizing the landscaping of a portion of the alley right-of-way, which a portion abuts the development and does not exceed two feet in width, such a licensed area need not be paved until the license is terminated. 3. Construct a new 16 -foot wide paved alley within 20 -feet of right-of-way between the existing alley, Leighfield Drive, Block 29 and Block 30. Dedicate clear title to the right-of-way and the improve the right of way by paving the full width and length of the right-of-way; provided, that the minimum width of the right-of-way is 16 -feet and the homeowners association has obtained a license agreement with the district authorizing the landscaping of a portion of the alley right-of-way, which a portion abuts the development and does not exceed two feet in width, such a licensed area need not be paved until the license is terminated. EXHIBIT D Heritage Commons Amended Subdivision PP -05-005 Required Findings for Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS Sections 12-3-3 T.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds that the requested zoning designation is in general compliance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and the Future Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential." b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that this development will not cause excessive additional requirements at public cost. The property to be annexed may be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services. Applicant shall be required to extend water and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development, thereby making them available to the adjacent properties. c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not conflict with the capital improvement plan. Because the developer is installing sewer, water, utilities and irrigation, the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. See item b. e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems associated with this subdivision that should be brought to the Council or Commission's attention. ACRD considers road safety issues in their analysis. No hazardous natural features have been identified on the site. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DAVE EVANS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 70 BUILDIING LOTS AND (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE LOTS) 11 COMMON LOTS ON 32.80 ACRES IN R-4 AND L -O ZONES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORY ROAD AND MERIDIAN ROAD IN A PORTION OF THE SE OF T. 3N., R. 1W., SECTION 24 CIC April 5, 2005 CASE NO. FP -05-022 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on April 5, 2005, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council. having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. I LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE SE/40F T. 3N., R. I W., SECTION 24, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP -05-022) Page 1 of 3 BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 02/18/05, SHEET 1 OF 4, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", EVANS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005, listing 29 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 10 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 5 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The PIat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. I / (FP -05-022) Page 2of3 Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of , 2005. By: Tammy d eerd a ayor, y of Meridian Attest:RPNALL; w � William G. Berg, Jr., Cit Cle Copy served upon. Applicant, the P1a'n ;apartment, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. .wo BY Dated:-6-6—cg ' y ClerNf�fice ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. i / (FP -05-022) Page 3 of 3 MAYOR Tamm de Weerd r _ PUBLIC WORKS Y CITY OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (208) 898-5500 • Fax (208)898-9551 Keith Bird ` Christine DonnellIIIA} !p �1 PLANNING AND ZONING Shaun Wardle DEPARTMENT Charles M. Rouuunee y� /� (208) 884-5533 - FAX 888-6854 " k a, .1`r3E�<<ttt 'i943 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 To: Mayor and City Council From: Sonya Allen., Assistant City Planner 0 Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator G Re: Strada Bellissima Subdivision Request for Final Plat approval of Seventy-nine (79) Single-family Residential Building Lots and Eleven (11) Common Lots on 32.80 Acres in R-4 and L -O Zones by Evans Construction Management (File No. FP -05-022). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION The applicant, Evans Construction Management, has applied for Final Plat approval of 79 single- family residential building lots and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres of land for Strada Bellissima Subdivision. The zoning designations for the proposed subdivision are R-4 (Low Density Residential) and L -O (Limited Office). Strada Bellissima Subdivision is located on the north-west comer of Victory Road and S. Meridian Road, in the SE % of Section 24, T.3N., R.1 W. A Conditional Use Pernlit/Planned Development was approved for this subdivision that included a reduction to the minimum street frontage requirement in an R-4 zone from 80 -ft. to 76 -ft. The Planned Development was approved with a 20% land use exception for the commercial portion of the development. Proposed amenities include a micropath and bus stop, an open space plaza, a tot lot, and detached sidewalks with street trees. A common area lot was added in Block 6 and two building lots were reconfigured in the same block; however, staff has no concerns with the proposed changes, and the submitted final plat still substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. Staff recommends approval of Strada Bellissima Subdivision with the comments and conditions stated in this report. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissinna Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 2 SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved Annexation (AZ -04-028), Preliminary Plat (PP -04-038), and Conditional Use Pen -nit (CUP -04-047) for this subdivision. 2. Fencing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10 and 12-13-15-9. 3. Revise or add the following notes on the face of the plat: (3.) ...exterior boundary lines and rear lot lines have a .. . Note #6 and #9 are duplications. Delete one or the other from the face of the plat. (11.) All buildings and improvements upon all lots in this subdivision shall comply with the Master Grading and Drainage Plan on file with the City of Meridian Public Works and Building Departments. 4. The landscape plan, dated 2116105, shall be revised as follows: a. Include landscaping on the south side of the pathway on Lot 4, Block 2. b. Show a min. 5 -ft. wide pathway with 5 -ft. landscaping on each side on Lot 17, Block 2. C. Perimeter fencing shall consist of 6 -ft. tall vinyl fencing to match Bear Creek's fencing. d. Show detail of proposed playground equipment on tot lot. e. Show location of proposed bus stop. 5. The applicant has indicated that Nampa Meridian Irrigation District will own and maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the irrigable common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 7. Provide adequate room for fire trucks to make a three-point turn on Lot 10, Block 7 and depict this area with an casement on the plat. 8. A master address identification plan must be worked out with the Fire Department prior to signature on the final plat. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 3 9. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28 -ft. inside and 48 -ft. outside radius. 10. Please submit a signed copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's ".Final" letter for the street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply. 11. The proposed street buffers along Meridian Road and Victory Road shall be planted with the initial subdivision improvements and shall not wait for development of the office lots. The buffer between land uses shall be planted with the parking lot improvements. All required buffers shall be maintained jointly by the business -owners and/or home -owners associations per CUP Finding No. 6, Exhibit F. 12. A cross -access agreement shall be provided to the outparcel (S1224449600) from the parking area on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 per CUP Finding No. 8, Exhibit F. Place a note on the plat along with the recorded instrument number of the agreement. 13. A cross -access agreement is required between the commercial lots within the subdivision. Place a note on the plat along with the recorded instrument number of the agreement. 14. The final plat must be dimensioned at 18" x 27" per Idaho State Code. All copies submitted to the City of Meridian shall be in this format. 15. All noted bearings and distances along the common boundary of Bear Creek don't match the recorded plats. Please revise to match, or note any discrepancies as information of record. 16. The sum of the rear lot dimensions doesn't equal the overall distance shown for Lots 1 I- 20, Block 1. Please make the appropriate corrections. 17. Include the instrument number of the Utility Easement through Block 2. 18. A master Grading and Drainage plan is required as part of the development plans. The Master Grading and Drainage plan shall include at a minimum the following: a. Finish. floor elevation for all houses in this development. b. Finish grade elevation. at each lot corner. C. Drainage flow patterns on all lots. d. If structural fill is to be placed on any lot, material specifications and compaction requirements shall be detailed. 19. Lot 6, Block 7 does not meet frontage on S. Appia Place; adjust lots to meet the minimum 76 -foot frontage required by the Conditional Use Permit. 20. Lots 8, 18, and 28, BIock 2 do not meet the minimw-n 76 -ft. street frontage requirement on S. Alfani Way. Make the necessary adjustments to meet this requirement. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Sellissima Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 4 21. Dimension the right-of-way width for the dedication along the Meridian Road frontage. 22. Please remove the graphically depicted rear lot easements since they are included in note number 3. 23. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 24. All development improvements, including sewer, fencing, micro-paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 25. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 1.10% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 26. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via existing mains. The applicant has shown sewer connecting to a 27" main in Meridian Road, this trunk line is not available at this time. According to the preliminary plat, sewer mains must be extended approximately % mile from. Elk Run to the north. The preliminary plat also stated that the applicant shall extend the water main along the east side of SH-69. Staff offers the alternative of installing a PRV vault where the twelve inch main ties into the proposed main in Victory. Applicant shall also be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, as well as License Agreements with the appropriate jurisdiction for any mains that are required to provide service. 27. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. 28. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100-year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. Any portion of a drainage area not improved with sod/grass recd (or other approved landscaping) shall not count towards the required open space area. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-fect above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. FP-05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada .Bellissima Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 5 29. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms of the approved Annexation, Preliminary Plat, or Conditional Use Permit does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS 1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will .not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two -hundred -fifty and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 5. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 8. All development features shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 9. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 10. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the above stated comments and conditions. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.doc BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PACKARD ESTATES DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF 42 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS AND 2 COMMON LOTS ON 12.24 ACRES IN AN R -S ZONE LOCATED EAST OF NORTH EAGLE ROAD AND SOUTH OF EAST USTICK ROAD IN A PORTION OF TH SE 1/ OF THE NW 1/ OF T. 3N., R. 1E., SECTION 4 CIC April 5, 2005 CASE NO. FP -05-023 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on April 5, 2005, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5 ,2005, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING REDFEATHER ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO, 7 LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE SE % OF THE NW % OF T. 3N., R. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REDFEATHER ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 7/ (F.P-05-023) Paget of 3 1. E., SECTION4, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 03/08/05, SHEET I OF 2, ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLP", PACKARD ESTATES DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005, listing 33 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 5 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter Engineering Solutions, LLP a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 3 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed. only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REDFEATHER ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 7/ (FP -05-023) Page 2 of 3 The Applicant is herebynotified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Ownermay request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with. the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision. and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. r--44- By action of the City Council at its regular: meeting held on the day of , 2005. apof mmy d or, Cit Meridian Attest: SUL William G. Berg, Jr., Ci6 ClerkISE Copy served upon Applicant, the PI Department, Public Works Department, and City torney. By. Dated: 29 'QS City Clerk's Office ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR. REDFEATHER ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 7/ (FP -05-023) Page 3 of 3 Re: Strada Bellissima Subdivision Request for Final Plat approval of Seventy-nine (79) Single-family Residential Building Lots and Eleven (11) Common Lots on 32.80 Acres in R-4 and L -O Zones by Evans Construction Management (File No. FP -05-022). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION The applicant, Evans Construction Management, has applied for Final Plat approval of 79 single- family residential building lots and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres of land for Strada Bellissima Subdivision. The zoning designations for the proposed subdivision are R-4 (Low Density Residential) and L -O (Limited Office). Strada Bellissima Subdivision is located on the north-west corner of Victory Road and S. Meridian Road, in the SE '/ of Section 24, T.3N., R.1 W. A Conditional Use Permit/Planned Development was approved for this subdivision that included a reduction to the minimum street frontage requirement in an R-4 zone from 80 -ft. to 76 -ft. The Planned Development was approved with a 20% land use exception for the commercial portion of the development. Proposed amenities include a micropath and bus stop, an open space plaza, a tot lot, and detached sidewalks with street trees. A cormnon area lot was added in Block 6 and two building lots were reconfigured in the same block; however, staff has no concerns with the proposed changes, and the submitted final plat still substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. Staff recommends approval of Strada Bellissima Subdivision with the comments and conditions stated in this report. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.dor- re rr,> MAYOR Tammy de Weerd e_I`['Y [ PUBLIC WORKS C)F�€`� . _. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ey BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 898-5500 • Fax (208)898-9551 Keith Bird Christine Donnell IDAHO PLANNING AND ZONING Shinn Wardle a /� Charles M. Rountree `YF (208) 884-5533 - FAX 888-6854 Ce Y GSe V, SIIEEE i t�J[73 Irmo mmr n�i STAFF STAFF REPORT: Hearing mn�n Date: April 5, 2005 To: Mayor and City Council From: Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator 1'1� C Re: Strada Bellissima Subdivision Request for Final Plat approval of Seventy-nine (79) Single-family Residential Building Lots and Eleven (11) Common Lots on 32.80 Acres in R-4 and L -O Zones by Evans Construction Management (File No. FP -05-022). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION The applicant, Evans Construction Management, has applied for Final Plat approval of 79 single- family residential building lots and 11 common lots on 32.80 acres of land for Strada Bellissima Subdivision. The zoning designations for the proposed subdivision are R-4 (Low Density Residential) and L -O (Limited Office). Strada Bellissima Subdivision is located on the north-west corner of Victory Road and S. Meridian Road, in the SE '/ of Section 24, T.3N., R.1 W. A Conditional Use Permit/Planned Development was approved for this subdivision that included a reduction to the minimum street frontage requirement in an R-4 zone from 80 -ft. to 76 -ft. The Planned Development was approved with a 20% land use exception for the commercial portion of the development. Proposed amenities include a micropath and bus stop, an open space plaza, a tot lot, and detached sidewalks with street trees. A cormnon area lot was added in Block 6 and two building lots were reconfigured in the same block; however, staff has no concerns with the proposed changes, and the submitted final plat still substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. Staff recommends approval of Strada Bellissima Subdivision with the comments and conditions stated in this report. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.dor- Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 2 SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1 FINAL PLAT I . AppIicant is to meet all terms of the approved Annexation (AZ -04-028), Preliminary Plat (PP -04-038), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP -04-047) for this subdivision. 2. Fencing must be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10 and 12-13-15-9. 3. Revise or add the following notes on the face of the plat: (3.) ... exterior boundary lines and rear lot lines have a ... Note #6 and #9 are duplications. Delete one or the other from the face of the plat. (11.) All buildings and improvements upon all lots in this subdivision shall comply with the Master Grading and Drainage Plan on file with the City of Meridian Public Works and Building Departments. 4. The landscape plan, dated 2116105, shall be revised as follows: a. Include landscaping on the south side of the pathway on. Lot 4, Block 2. b. Show a min. 5 -ft. wide pathway with 5 -ft. landscaping on each side on Lot 17, Block 2. C. Perimeter fencing shall consist of 6 -ft. tall vinyl fencing to match Bear Creek's fencing. d. Show detail of proposed playground equipment on tot lot. e. Show location of proposed bus stop. 5. The applicant has indicated that Nampa Meridian Irrigation District will own and maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the irrigable common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer, 6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 7. Provide adequate room for fire trucks to make a three-point turn on Lot 10, Block 7 and depict this area with an easement on the plat. 8. A master address identification plan must be worked out with the Fire Department prior to signature on the final plat. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 3 9. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28-ft. inside and 48-ft. outside radius. 10. Please submit a signed copy of the Ada County Street Naive Committee's "Final" letter for the street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply. 11. The proposed street buffers along Meridian Road and Victory Road shall be planted with the initial subdivision improvements and shall not wait for development of the office lots. The buffer between land uses shall be planted with the parking lot improvements. All required buffers shall be maintained. jointly by the business-owners and/or home-owners associations per CUP Finding No. 6, Exhibit F. 12. A cross-access agreement shall be provided to the outparcel (S1224449600) from the parking area on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 per CUP Finding No. 8, Exhibit F. Place a note on the plat along with the recorded instrument number of the agreement. 13. A cross-access agreement is required between the commercial lots within the subdivision. Place a note on the plat along with the recorded instrument number of the agreement. 14. The final plat must be dimensioned at 18" x 27" per Idaho State Code. All copies submitted to the City of Meridian shall be in this format. 15. All noted bearings and distances along the common boundary of Bear Creek don't match the recorded plats. Please revise to match, or note any discrepancies as information of record. 16. The sum of the rear lot dimensions doesn't equal the overall distance shown for Lots 11- 20, Block 1. Please make the appropriate corrections. 17. Include the instrument number of the Utility Easement through Block 2. 18. A master Grading and Drainage plan is required. as part of the development plans. The Master Grading and Drainage plan shall include at a minimum the following: a. Finish floor elevation for all houses in this development. b. Finish grade elevation at each lot corner. C. Drainage flow patterns on all lots. d. If structural fill is to be placed on any lot, material specifications and compaction requirements shall be detailed. 19. Lot 6, Block 7 does not meet frontage on S. Appia Place; adjust lots to meet the minimum 76-foot frontage required by the Conditional Use Permit, 20. Lots 8, 1.8, and 28, Block 2 do not meet the minimum 76-ft. street frontage requirement on S. Alfani Way. Make the necessary adjustments to meet this requirement. H-05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellissima Sub FP.doc E Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 4 21. Dimension the right-of-way width for the dedication along the Meridian Road frontage. 22. Please remove the graphically depicted rear loft easements since they are included in note number 3. 23. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 24. All development improvements, including sewer, fencing, micro -paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 25. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 26. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via existing mains. The applicant has shown sewer connecting to a 27" main in Meridian Road, this trunk line is not available at this time. According to the preliminary plat, sewer mains must be extended approximately % mile from Elk Run to the north. The preliminary plat also stated that the applicant shall extend the water main along the east side of SH -69. Staff offers the alternative of installing a PRV vault where the twelve inch main ties into the proposed main in Victory. Applicant shall also be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, as well as License Agreements with the appropriate jurisdiction for any mains that are required to provide service. 27. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development planreview, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution. 02-374. 28. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained. only during 100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. Any portion of a drainage area not improved with sod/grass seed (or other approved landscaping) shall not count towards the required open space area. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Sellissima Sub FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 5 29. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions, or terms of the approved Annexation, Preliminary Plat, or Conditional Use Pen -nit does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two -hundred -fifty and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 5. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Pennitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with. and NPDES Permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 8. All development features shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act, 9. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 10. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the above stated comments and conditions. FP -05-022 Exhibit "A" Strada Bellisshria Sub FP.doc BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DAVE EVANS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 70 BUILDIING LOTS AND (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE LOTS) 11 COMMON LOTS ON 32.80 ACRES IN R-4 AND L -O ZONES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORY ROAD AND MERIDIAN ROAD IN A PORTION OF THE SE OF T. 3N., R. IW., SECTION 24 CIC April 5, 2005 CASE NO. FP -05-022 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on April 5, 2005, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete from Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE SE % OF T. 3N., R. 1W., SECTION 24, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP -05-022) Page 1 of 3 BOISE MERIDIAN MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2005, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 02/18/05, SHEET 1 OF 4, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC.", EVANS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Alien, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005, listing 29 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 10 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 5 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is herebynotified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, OF FINAL PLAT FOR STRADA BELLISSIMA SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP -05-022) Page 2 of 3 Clerk not more than. twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in. real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day .2005. By: Attest: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk Tammy de Weerd Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. BY Dated: City Clerk's Office ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR STR.ADA BELLISSEVIA SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP -05-022) Page 3 of 3 April 4, 2005 Mayor and City Council City of Meridian k'I ' 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 File No. FP -05-023 Dear Mayor and Council: We have reviewed the recommendations for the City Council meeting of April 5, 2005, and have the following responses: SITE SPECIFIC CONDIT ONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply, 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will comply. 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply; standards will be coordinated with the Parks Department. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant will comply. G:tDocuments and 6ettingslgreemV ocai Sett"ngrATcmporsry Internet Files\01.K241RmResponse.doc hxhihit "13" Ow 00 COUNU E!planoirtg l50 East Aikens Street Suit B arra eggineediq commuiRies lortAe oure Eagle, ID 83616 Picone: (208) 938-0980 LLP Fax: (208) 938-0941 E-mail: es-beckym@gwest.net April 4, 2005 Mayor and City Council City of Meridian k'I ' 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 File No. FP -05-023 Dear Mayor and Council: We have reviewed the recommendations for the City Council meeting of April 5, 2005, and have the following responses: SITE SPECIFIC CONDIT ONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply, 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will comply. 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply; standards will be coordinated with the Parks Department. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant will comply. G:tDocuments and 6ettingslgreemV ocai Sett"ngrATcmporsry Internet Files\01.K241RmResponse.doc hxhihit "13" Mayor and City Council .April 4, 2005 Page 2 12. The applicant will comply. 13. The applicant will comply. 14. The applicant will comply. 15. Proper engineering of the rock sump inlet requires the design shown on the plan to stabilize the pipe and prevent scouring of the ponds. The applicant will work with staff to coordinate an acceptable design of the drainage swales. 16. The applicant will comply. 17. The applicant will comply. 18. The applicant will comply. 19. The applicant will comply. 20. The applicant will comply. 21. The applicant will comply. 22. The applicant will comply. 23. The applicant will comply. 24. The applicant will comply. 25. The applicant will comply, with the exception of the South Slough, which will remain open. 26. The applicant will comply. 27. The applicant will comply. 28. The applicant will comply. 29. The applicant will comply. 30. The applicant will comply. 31. The applicant will comply. 32. The applicant will comply- CADOcuments =d SettingslgreentlLora! SettingsU mporary Tmemet Fiies10LK241RecsResponse.doc i^zhibit 13- Mayor and City Council April 4, 2005 Page 3 33. rioted We appreciate staffs review of our project. We respectfully request approval of the application for final plat. Thank you. Sincerely, Engineering Solutions, LLP Becky McKay, Partner Project Manager BM: ss cc: Mr. R. Craig Groves 000cuznenis and S MlingsigreenftiLomd SettingslTempomy Infemct Files10MMRecsRespomc, doc MAYOR ..� CITY HALL n (208) 888-4433 -- Fax 887-4813 Tammy de WeerdP� crry OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird , (208) 887-2211 Fax 898-9551 v tt Christine Donnell IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT Shaun Wardle Charles M. Rountree A(208) 466-9272 -- FAX 466-4405 t9ii3 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 To: Mayor and City Council From: Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner f yll Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator Re: Redfeather Estates Subdivision. No. 7 Request for Final Plat Approval of Forty-two (42) Single -Family Residential Building Lots and Two (2) Common Lots on 12.24 Acres in an R-8 Zone for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7, by Packard Estates Development, LLC (File No. FP-05-023). We have reviewed the above-referenced submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION The applicant, Packard Estates Development, LLC, has applied for Final Plat approval of 42 single -family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 12.24 acres of land for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7. The zoning designation for the proposed subdivision is R-8 (Medium Density Residential). This phase of the Redfeather Development has a gross density of 3.43 d.u.Jacre and a net density of 4.15 d.u./acre. Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 is located approximately 1/amile east of N. Eagle Road and 1/2 mete south of E. Ustick Road, in the NW 1/of Section 4, T. 3N., R. 1E. The two common area lots within this subdivision consist of landscaping, open space, storm drainage, and pathways. Said common area lots will be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. The pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. Amenities proposed with this phase of Redfeather Subdivision include a basketball court and a 10-ft, wide multi-use pathway bordering the South. Slough. FP -05-023 Exhibit "A" Redfeather Estates Sub7. FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 2 of 5 This subdivision was preliminary platted as Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 2. A Conditional Use Permit was approved for this subdivision that allowed for reductions to the minimum requirements for the R-8 zone for the following: lot size (from 6,500 s.f. to 5,250 s.f. - detached), street frontage (from 65 -feet to 37 -feet & cul-de-sacs from 40 -feet to 33 - feet), and house size (from 1,301 s.f. to 1,200 s.f.). The pedestrian pathway/access road on north side of Lot 8, Block 24 was relocated to the west side of the common area; however, staff has no concerns with the proposed change, and the submitted final plat still substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the comments and conditions stated in this report. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved Development Agreement (Inst. #104129528), Annexation (AZ -03-021), Preliminary Plat (PP -03-024), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP -03-041) approved for this development. 2. The pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. Said backup is being supplied by a single point connection within the earlier phases. 3. Sanitary sewer service to this subdivision shall be via an extension from the South Slough Trunk. The applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 4. Municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains in E. Ustick Road, and N. Eagle Road. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties within the City of Meridian's Urban Services Planning Area. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the :Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 5. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. FP -05-023 Exhibit "A" Redfeather Estates Sub7. FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 3 of 5 6. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and including a 100 -year storm event. 7. A permanent public pedestrian easement shall be created for the pathway within Lot 12, Block 25 and recorded prior to signature of the City Engineer on the final plat. The easement shall be sufficient width to cover the 10 -foot wide pathway shown. The 10 - foot wide hard surfaced pathway shall be constructed and fully improved prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building within this phase of the subdivision. Applicant shall work with the City Parks Dept. and conform to the Park's Dept. standards for construction of the pathway. The Homeowner's Association is responsible for maintenance of all landscaping adjacent to the pathway. 8. The width of the common area on the south side of Lot 8, Block 24 leading to E. Tahiti Drive shall be widened to a minimum of 15-11. 9. All fencing shall be in compliance with MCC 12-4-10. 10. Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed along the perimeter of the subdivision where permanent fencing is not proposed. 11. Graphically depicted Public Utilities, Drainage Irrigation easement shall be widened to 24 -feet. The extra width is needed for a gravity irrigation main. 12. On the face of the plat include the CP&F Number for the center quarter corner. 13. Add or revise the following plat notes: (9.) Include recorded instrument number of sanitary sewer easement. (15.) Add a note referring to the public pedestrian easement on a portion of Lot 12, Block 25 and note the recorded instrument number of the agreement. Indicate that the City of Meridian will be responsible for the maintenance of the pathway surface located within the easement. Also indicate who will be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping within the easement. 14. Revise the Landscape Plan (dated 12-20-04, prepared. by Harvest Design) as follows: 15. Rock sump inlet shown in the drainage swale on Lot 1.2, Block 25 may not exceed 5 -ft. in any horizontal dimension per MCC 12-13-14-2, revise plan to reflect this requirement. Cobble may be allowed if designed as a dry stream bed or other design feature. FP -05-023 Exhibit "A" Redfeather Estates Sub7..FP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 4 of 5 16. Show a rein. 5 -ft wide hard surface pathway with 5 -ft landscaping on each side on the pathway leading from the common area on Lot 8, Block 24 to E. Tahiti Drive. 17. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 18. One -Hundred watt (1.00w), high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 19. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 20. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 21. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Deputy Fire Chief and the Public Works Department. 22. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC 12- 13-10-8. 23. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 24. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Narne Committee's "Final" letter for the street names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply. 25. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 26. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. FP -05-023 Exhibit "A" Redfeather Estates SubT FP.doc r,- Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: April 5, 2005 Page 5 of 5 27. All development improvements, including sewer, fencing, micro -paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 28. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 29. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100 -year storin events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. Any portion of a drainage area not improved with sod/grass seed (or other approved landscaping) shall not count towards the required open space area. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I -foot above. 30. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 31. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Arany Corps of Engineers. 32. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 33. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved annexation, preliminary plat, or conditional use permit does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 7 with the above stated comments and conditions. PP -05-023 Exhibit "A" Redfeather Estates SubT FP.doc Cl O � 4—j cf) M M O V O � � • 4� V V O V ct V c� (1) ct m N ct � O °' o ''� w0) ( c� z z (3) s C> `a o CD 4 N bA 4-J 4 -JO U •, cu• �, 4-, . r.., ►� C) � o cd Cz V �ct cz 75 g4 . .� Cd ..1 4-4 C. 0 u r N O N Q 4-j N ct U O � � E C3 CCi cj 0 di f CDD CD 222 C. ,4--J V Q r—, O ca „j CD A ct a� cd 4-3 COD a� ct 4-a o a a' � 4-j LO - CL. °o a 00 00 o E o ucot V H bio Q ''�" '� • cv c� N • �+ 4-3 u .c 0 u • .cc�,. y..,.. �•}--I • r-1 Q .�J p^ V ct co C\ rr ll Q� . F--44-1 Q Ct Q ct �,.4 (v Q) :� M �4cz 04 t4..q Cc Q v � Ca M .,._, 0 V N to.� C Ct � • Q] IC62 �-•� cc Rw- U �-+ U --.i Q U O � �? . U ^Ici 4`.' Ctcoo CZ ,...., r .�- ' M • X ;--r O 4�r cn CU Ct P4 cp cn � CTS O U N Q} P ;-4 U r U U CJS �—t r4-4 pT w� • U �p�] -�V +-+ � n , U VCl/ 4 rj -I_j , r -i 1-14 0 J M 2 . CL's 362 CtCC N -� Qa U CD m� -J OS O CCl) U � U ° NCt U 14 Cd En 4-J a) Cd �.�a C� � N ct .,.., c•; cu C) P-0 +j ., 4-4 v �W C�. - -,bio rm. r.., Ct P crjU ., � C� o $:!Ct c o alq a� Cd `�. CU Ct , CCS CD CD IC... 4-J cz O +j � •� DOP-4a w (a) 4—j 7;zl C,d m U bJQ Cll cld E V)O W O �., L cam, 4C.)cd Q ;--' •~ ;5cz N • Cf) �. 4 - o�� �obZ �o � _Mcn RECEIVED GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS APR - 5 2005 (PROVISIONS TO BE INSERTED INTO LEASE AGREEMENT) Cityty of Meridian A. Grounds Maintenance Requirements Ciclerk Office 1. Lessee is hereby required to provide grounds maintenance services, including, but not limited to, the obligation to mow, edge, trim, ovcrseed, fertilize, aerate, irrigate, sod, change cups, service tees, topdress, raise divots, rake traps, spray, mop, spot irrigate, syringe, and renovate turf and shrub areas designated hereunder; as well as to provide weed, disease and pest control, tree maintenance, maintenance of irrigation system including mainlines, pumps, boosters and controllers, keep swales in good repair and to provide the necessary maintenance of any appurtenant structures and equipment, and other duties as set forth in the attached Exhibit titled "Grounds Maintenance Services Management Plan" as developed by Lessee. 2. With regard to the level of maintenance, all work shall be performed in accordance with the standards of the Golf Course Superintendent Association of America (GCSAA), United States Golf Association (USGA) or similar organization, as changed and modified from time to time and at established frequencies so as to maintain the aesthetic level and proper playing condition of the golf course. Standards and frequencies may be modified from time to time as deemed necessary by for the maintenance of the demised premises. 3. Lessee shall provide and maintain in its employ at the demised premises a golf course superintendent and maintenance crew, on a daily basis. All of the Lessee's maintenance personnel shall be supervised by a Class "A" superintendent. Lessee must employ sufficient personnel to perform all work as scheduled and required by the City. 4. Lessee will provide the City with the names and telephone numbers of at least two (2) qualified persons who can be called by City representatives when emergency maintenance conditions occur during hours when the Lessee's normal work force is not present. The City shall call for such assistance only in the event of a genuine and substantial emergency. This provision does not pertain to conditions rendering the course unusable as otherwise set forth herein. 5. Whenever play must be temporarily suspended on the golf course facility due to inclement weather conditions, the decision on when to allow play to resume, and when to allow golf cars to go out on the course, will be made by the Lessee. 6. The Lessee at its sole cost and expense shall furnish all necessary equipment, supplies and material of good quality and in sufficient amounts to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement and to accomplish an acceptable and professional level of maintenance. Storage and handling of all fertilizers, fungicide, insecticides, herbicides and petroleum products shall be in accordance with all federal, state and manufacturer's regulations and standards. RECEIVED EXHIBIT APR d 5 2005 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICES MANAGEMENT PLAN Ety nF Meridian _:tiy Clea Office (SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR LESSEE) DURING THE ACTIVE GOLF SEASON (GENERALLY MAY IST TO SEPTEMBER 15T11) LESSEE SHALL UNDERTAKE THE FOLLOWING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES A. MOW GREENS MINIMUM 5 TIMES PER WEEK B. MOW TEES MINIMUM 3 TIMES PER WEEK C. MOW FAIRWAYS 3 TIMES PER WEEK D. RAKE SAND TRAPS DAILY E. CHANGE CUPS 5 TIMES PER WEEK F. MOW PRACTICE AREA 3 TIMES PER WEEK G. CHANGE TEE BOXES DAILY H. WATER DAILY (HAND WATER AS NECESSARY) I. FERTILIZE GREENS 3 TIMES PER YEAR J. FERTILIZE FAIRWAYS 3 TIMES PER YEAR K. PUNCH FAIRWAYS I TO 2 TIMES PER YEAR L. AERATE AND SAND GREENS AT LEAST 2 TIMES PER YEAR M. VERTICUT GREENS EVERY 2 TO 3 WEEKS N. GROOM GREENS AT LEAST I TIME PER WEEK 0. MOW ROUGH MINIMUM 2 TIMES PER WEEK P. CLEAN RESTROOMS AND PUBLIC AREAS DAILY AND AS NEEDED Q. SERVICE EQUIPMENT DAILY AND AS NEEDED R. CHECK AND EVALUATE PONDS AND CART PATHS WEEKLY S. SERVICE PUMPS AND WATER SYSTEM DAILY DURING THE OFF-SEASON (GENERALLY, SEPTEMBER 16 TO APRIL 30TH) THE LESSEE SHALL UNDERTAKE THE ABOVE TASKS ON AN AS -NEEDED BASIS x¢*'`- 2006-2010 Five -Year Work Program Table of Contents Page No. SECTION 1: Introduction to the Five -Year Work Program 1-2 What is the Five -Year Work Program? 1-2 How is the Five -Year Work Program Developed? 1-3 Major Issues Addressed in the Five -Year Work Program 1-6 How is the Five -Year Work Program Organized? 1-6 Reading the Five -Year Work Program 1-7 Table 1: Five -Year Work Program Revenues vs. Expenditures 1-8 Common Acronyms and Abbreviations SECTION 2: Major Individual Projects Note: See Section 2 Table of Contents for complete list of projects. 2-1 Roadway Program 2-16 Intersection Program 2-28 Bridge Program 2-34 Community Program: Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Individual Projects SECTION 3: Other Capital Programs & Projects Note: See Section 3 Table of Contents for complete list of sub -programs and years. 3-1 Corridor Preservation Program 3-1 Traffic Program 3-2 Roadway Drainage Program 3-3 Maintenance Program 3-5 Miscellaneous Projects 3-5 Cooperative Program 3-6 Community Program SECTION 4: Appendix 4-1 Coordination with Idaho Transportation Department 4-1 Major Capital Studies 4-3 Projected Major Development -Led Projects 4-3 ACHD Commission District Information 4-4 ACHD Commission District Map iii What is the Five -Year Work Program? The Treasure Valley consistently ranks as one of the tap -10 metropolitan areas in the country in terms of growth. Ada County includes many of the fastest growing cities in the state of Idaho and has surpassed 350,000 in population based on recent estimates. The Ada County Highway District must meet the needs of this growing population while balancing growth with an ever-increasing need to maintain the existing roadway system. These growing needs necessitate carefully planned short- and long-range strategies to most effectively allocate the funding provided by the taxpayers ofAda County. The Five -Year Work Program is the short-range piece of such planning efforts. Each year, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) adopts the Five -Year Work Program (FYWP) as a plan for the agency's capital programs over the next five years. It is developed through input of the six cities and county governments in Ada County, the citizens and neighborhood associations, and other planning agencies and documents. The FYWP identifies a programmed construction year for almost 100 individual projects and allocates funds to more than 15 programs where projects are not identified until the annual budget is produced. The cost estimates for these projects must balance within an acceptable range to projected revenues over each of the five years. The 2006-2010 FYWP reflects a capital program that is in transition as a result of new programs and procedures undertaken by ACHD and other agencies. These include ACHD's Capital Improvements Pian, the Pedestrian & Bicycle Transition Plan, Blueprint for Good Growth and Communities in Motion. The current ACHD Commission, or any future Commission, is not necessarily committed to specific future projects or the projected dates for construction. Actual allocation of funds to a project occurs when the annual Budget is adopted by the Commission. Projects in the FYWP scheduled for construction in 2006, 2007 and 2008 may be regarded as more committed than those projects shown in 2009 and 2010. The latter two years are more tentative and subject to change as priorities and revenue projections change. The Preliminary Development (PD) category is for projects that currently have no funding year committed, but are identified as a recognized need_ These projects will be considered for placement in a programmed year in the next update of the program, or sooner if the opportunity arises. How is the Five -Year Work Program developed? The development of the FYWP is a year-round process, with most of the public input and review occurring from August to December each year. The program is typically adopted in December or January at a regular meeting of ACHD's Commission, where public input is also received. The 2006-2010 FYWP was adopted December 22, 2004. Projects and their status are tracked throughout the year for any changes in scheduling that result from funding issues, Commission decisions and general changes in the scope of projects. The first year of the FYWP is used as the first draft of the ACHD Budget for the upcoming year. Any 1-2 projects that are delayed as a result of the budget process must be reprogrammed in the next FYWP. The FYWP is developed with a great deal of input from the public. Each year, ACHD meets with each of the six cities, the county governments, and the Idaho Transportation Department. Many of these agencies appoint a citizen -led transportation task force that recommends a prioritized list of projects to the city council or county commission. Each council or commission typically endorses the request list at their regular meetings. Input is also received throughout the year as ACHD staff attends numerous public and neighborhood association meetings. This effort is coordinated with the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), who is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Boise and Nampa Urbanized Areas. Where applicable, ACHD prioritizes the requests from the cities and county, which compete with other projects within the various categories of the FYWP (roadways, intersections, bridges, etc.) and across categories for funding and scheduling. For Roadway Projects, ACHD is continuing a ranking process for the FYWP that has evolved over the past five years. This quantitative process evaluates each project based on 14 factors, which include technical analysis and programming or community factors. Factors such as safety, capacity and functional classification are considered under the technical analysis while public/agency support, geographic equity and funding partnerships are considered under the programming/community factors. As part of the 2006-2010 FYWP update process, ACHD prioritized more than 50 roadway projects that are identified either in agency request lists or the first 10 years of the Capital Improvements Plan. More than 30 of these roadway projects have funds programmed in the FYWP. Intersection projects are prioritized based on technical methods such as accident rates, traffic volumes and signal warrants. This process is proposed to be refined to include more programming or community factors. In addition, the Community Program: Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk projects have been selected through a new process by which ACHD prioritizes them based on 11 factors including traffic volumes, proximity to schools, funding partnerships, and buy -in from impacted property owners. This FYWP identifies these Community Program projects for 2006 and 2007. Projects may be included for 2008 if outside funding is pending. Prioritization processes are reviewed on an annual basis byACHD and presented to other agencies and the publicthrough a variety of forums for the purpose of refining the process and educating the public. Currently, ACHD is in the process of developing similar ranking methods for bridge and drainage projects. Major issues Addressed in the Five -Year Work Program The FYWP must be updated annually to reflect the dynamics of the Highway District. Revenue projections, cost increases, finalization of studies, city requirements and changes in transportation trends have a major impact on the entire program as well as individual projects. The FYWP is likely to show major and minor changes to many projects after each annual update due to these factors. Many issues are discussed by the ACHD Commission leading up to adoption of the Five -Year Work Program. Some issues lead to major changes in projects or programs. Major changes are defined changes in the scope or type of project; changes in projects previously identified in the first three years of the program; or major shifts in policy as directed by the ACHD Commission. Following is a list of issues addressed during development of the 2006-2010 FYWP. 1-3 Policy Issues ♦ Programming Amounts: The Five -Year Work Program carefully balances the amount of project costs with projected revenues. In the past, the goal had been to over -program by no more than $500,000 in each fiscal year. As ACHD's programs are in transition and expenditures are being analyzed and refined, the 2006-2010 FYWP has been over - programmed by approximately $2.0 million per year. This approach will allow ACHD to slate projects for advance design or right-of-way acquisition pending increases in revenue. Should additional revenues not materialize, the FYWP would be adjusted accordingly in the next update. ♦ Vehicle Registration Fees: The Vehicle Registration Fee, which would account for approximately $8.0 million in Preliminary Development (PD), sunsets following 2010. The $8.0 million has not been included in revenue projections, therefore some high priority roadway projects are not included wholly or at all in PD. These projects are noted in Section 2 by a gray box with a notation regarding registration fees. Construction year is designated as OF (Unfunded construction). Priority, at this time, indicates the following would be added to the FYWP if the Vehicle Registration Fees were renewed beyond 2010. • Cloverdale, Fairview to Ustick (—$3.5 million construction estimate) • Fairview, Cloverdale to Five Mile (--$4.5 million construction estimate) ♦ Community Program Set -Aside: The $500,000 annual Community Program Set -Aside will be directed to projects identified in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Transition Plan (PBTP). The PBTP is a complete inventory of the sidewalk system in the metropolitan areas of Ada County and will develop a strategy to bring the system into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. It will also address areas where bicycle facilities can be added to the existing system to fill-in gaps. The $500,000 in 2006 will go toward designing projects identified as top priorities in the PBTP. The entire set of Community Programs will be reexamined once the PBTP is complete. ♦ Programming of Low Priority Projects: Prioritization methods established by ACHD are meant to address the priorities of a wide array of projects, even within individual programs. There are cases where the rankings are not able to spell out completely why a project is included in the FYWP. Some are unique in nature, some are high priority for other agencies or cities, while others have been included in the FYWP and other planning documents for many years. The following projects are included based on factors other than priority: • Highland St, Broadway to ParkCenter via Mallard: See reasoning below under "Collector Projects" • 3611, Hill, Catalpa Intersection: This project is included in the FYWP , along with the 361" Street Extension to Cartwright, based on policies established by the City of Boise and ACHD as referenced in the Boise City Foothills Policy Plan (1997) and the Foothills Transportation Plan developed by APA (now COMPASS) in 1998. The project was recognized in the 1996 Hill Road Corridor Study. ♦ On -the -Shelf Projects: ACHD has recognized the need to develop appropriate on -the - shelf projects that are designed several years in advance of construction in the event that new revenue sources are found or existing sources unexpectedly increase. The 2006-2010 FYWP includes numerous projects where design and/or right-of-way is programmed more than one year prior to construction. These are listed below. ( * indicates projects were budgeted for design as shelf projects in 2005) and are not listed as project changes: 1-4 • 3011 Street Extension, Main to Rose* • East ParkCenter Bridge • Fairview & Cloverdale intersection* • Five Mile, Fairview to Ustick • Floating Feather, Eagle Rd to Edgewood • Franklin & Allumbaugh intersection • Franklin & Liberty intersection • Hill Road Extension, State Hwy 55 to State St.* • Ustick & Linder intersection* ♦ Collector Projects: As of 2003, projects along collectors are no longer eligible for impact fee funding as a result of policy changes, yet ACHD recognizes the vital role collectors play within a regional transportation system even though they may not be the highest ranking projects. In previous FYWPs, ACHD has allocated roughly $750,000 per year to collector projects when compared to arterial needs. ACHD is examining a prioritization methodology to analyze these projects separately from arterial projects. This amount has been honored through the programming of the following projects: • Adams St, Veterans Parkway to Chinden via 371h/Clay1361h: This top priority for Garden City will complete the Adams corridor from the Western Idaho Fairgrounds to Chinden Boulevard where it intersects 36'h & Orchard. • Highland St, Broadway to ParkCenter via Mallard: This project will add curb gutter and sidewalks to this collector roadway that connects two principal arterials—Broadway Ave. (US 20126) and ParkCenter Blvd. It is programmed for construction in 2006. Previous rankings have shown this project as a low priority, however, when ranked only among collectors it is in the top -3 in that category. It has been listed in the FYWP since 1999. • Hill Road Extension, State Hwy 55 to State Street: This project will complete the connection of Hill Road from Boise to Eagle. Portions west of Edgewood will be constructed by development with the rest slated for construction in 2009. Major Project Changes ♦ Eagle Road, Victory to Ridenbaugh Canal; Victory & Eagle intersection; Victory and Cloverdale intersection: These three projects were programmed for construction in 2006 but have been reprogrammed for 2007 to avoid potential conflicts with 2006 construction on Overland, from Topaz to Five Mile. ♦ Locust Grove, Franklin to Fairview: Construction was reprogrammed to 2006 from 2007 to correspond with construction of the Locust Grove Overpass now that advance - construct Federal funding has been identified for the Overpass in 2006. ♦ Five Mile, Franklin to Fairview: Due to changes in the Federal Aid program and time needed to acquire right-of-way, construction was moved from 2007 to 2008. ♦ Roadway Drainage Projects: ACHD has reexamined all of the roadway drainage projects included in the FYWP. Many of them have been deferred until adjacent roadway projects are needed. The Brookhollow Storm Drain and Vista Regional Storm Drain (right-of-way purchase only) are the only roadway drainage projects with funding programmed in the FYWP. ♦ Ustick, Five Mile to Cole: ACHD has determined that a cross-section of 82 -feet instead of the standard 96 -feet is most appropriate for this section of roadway based on the desire to maintain the context of the surrounding neighborhood and minimize utility impacts. 1-5 How is the Fine -Year Work Program Organized? In 2003, ACHD altered the way in which projects and other various programs are organized within the Budget and the FYWP. Below is a listing of programs and how they are organized: ♦ Roadway Program: Includes roadway projects funded byACHD. These projects typically involved widening or major rebuilding of arterial, collector and non-residential local roads. This program also includes an annual allocation to the Corridor Preservation program, which allowsACHD to purchase right-of-way from new development on identified roadways prior to the year identified for in the FYWP or Capital Improvements Plan. ♦ Intersection Program: Includes intersection rebuild and traffic signal installation projects. ♦ Bridge Program: Includes new bridges, major bridge (greater than 20 -feet in span) and minor bridge (less than or equal to 20 -feet in span) replacements, rehabilitation and guardrail installation projects. ♦ Traffic Program: Includes projects and programs aimed at upgrades of traffic signal equipment, installation of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) hardware and software, and ACRD Commuteride projects, including park & ride lots. ♦ Roadway Drainage Program: Includes projects associated with the management of stormwater that falls on ACHD roadways. ♦ Maintenance Program: Includes annual programs for overlays, crack seal projects, cul-de-sac chipseals, and scrub coat projects. ♦ Cooperative Program: Provides annual allocation for projects that result from cooperative agreements between ACHD and other public or private interests. ♦ Community Program: Includes curb, gutter and sidewalk projects (formerly Neighborhood Enhancement), sidewalk repair, bikeways and safe route/school projects. Reading the Five -Year Work Program The FYWP is a fiscally -constrained program, which means anticipated costs for individual projects and programs match the projected revenues of the highway district within a designated margin. Each year, ACHD staff develops revenue projections for the FYWP. These projections are based on anticipated growth in ACHD's various revenue sources, which include property taxes, vehicle registration fees, the Highway Distribution Account (gas tax), state sales tax and impact fees. The total revenue projection is then divided into two subcategories ---Maintenance & Operations and Capital Projects. The amount identified for Capital Projects serves as the amount available for the FYWP and matches the revenue column in Table 1. Table 1 is a breakdown of the amount of expenditures programmed in the FYWP. These programmed expenditures are separated into each phase of the project. Section 2 displays information on each project, including a description, vicinity map, total cost and ACHD's portion of the total cost. ACHD has information available regarding the amount of each phase estimated for each project (Design, Right -of -Way acquisition and Construction). Please contact ACHD for more information regarding the cost estimate and scheduled year. Some projects have construction year designated as "UF", or unfunded. This simply means that funding is allocated to the project's design or right-of-way acquisition, but full funding of construction is not yet included in the FYWP This is due to either priority or fiscal constraints. These projects are candidates to be included for construction in the next update of the FYWP. 1-6 Table 1: Five -Year Work Program Revenues vs. Expenditures Expenditures Construction Traffic Programmed Prof Services Right -of -Way Construction Engineering Utilities Material Expenses 2006 ($4,380,000) ($12,360,000) ($13,140,000) ($350,000) ($110,000) -.. _ _. _ ........... _.... ($900,000) ($31,240,000) 2007 ($1,010,000 ) ($s,2ao,aoD) ($22,020,000) _ ($310,000) ($260,000) ($1,120,000) ($32,920,000) 2008 ($1,350,000) ($7,960,000) ($18,380,000) ($350,000) ($190,000) ($1,490,000) ($29,720,000) 2009 ($2,040,000 ............_..-..._._ .. _... ) {$5,600,000) ($20,630,000) ($470,000) ($290,000) ($1,100,000) ($30,130,000) 2010 ($1,140,000) ($5,650,000) ($19,250,000) ($270,000) ($910,000) ($820,000) ($28,040,000) Sub Total ' $9,920,000 $39,770,OOil ... $.93,420,O $.1,760;000 , Q�1 .. 1-,1$.5x430 0#10 $I050000 PD ($6,180,000) ($8,380,000) ($30,896,000) ($730,000) ($110,000) ($1,600,000) ($47,890,000) Sub Total $6; (;50,000 ' , $8;380;OflU' ". $3,'89(?';00 ::$730;(16(1 $110;000 $.1600fb00 ,...< $47,890;1100 "- Program Totals ($16,100,000) ($48,150,000) $124,310,000) ($2,480,000) ($1,870,000) ($7,030,000) ($199,940,000) Revenue Difference Funding Revenue Minus Revenue Reimbursements Total Revenue Programmed Expenses Outside Funding 2006 $26 010,000 $3,230,0100 $29,240,000 _......... ($2,000,000) $9 310,000 2007 $26,180,060.. $4,800,000 $30,970,000 - — -- - --. _....._..: ($1,950,000) $8...... 00 2008 $26,260,000 $1,540,000 $27,790,000 ---._.._. ($1,930 000) _....._........ $6,830,000 2009 $26,220,000 $1,900,000 $28,130,000 ($2,000,000) $6,750,000 i 2010 $26,050,000 $26,050 000 ($1,990,000) ........ W.. ........_...... __........__......... _ ......._- PD $42,700,000 $1,950,000 $44,640000 ($3,250,000) ....$....7....,.110,000 _. __._. $9,200,000 $173,420,000 $13,420,000 $186,820;000 ($13,120,000) _$47,980,000 Notes: 1. Programmed Expenses = (Prof Services) + (Right -of -Way) + (Construction) + (Construction Engineering) + (Utilities) + (Traffic Mall) 2. Total Revenue = (Projected Revenue) + (Total Reimbursements) 3. Difference = (Total Revenue) - (Programmed Expenditures) 4. PD = about two years of projects 5. Years beyond the first are inflated 2.5% per annum (only on this Summary Sheet) for Programmed Expenditure Total and Total Reimbursements. 6. Target for each year's Difference column is - $2.0 million 7. All figures are rounded to the nearest $10,000. 1-7 Reading the Five -Year Work Program Figure 1: Project Information Legend Project Title & Limits Area of improvement �.� Vicinity Map (Dotted lines indicate N Project Description: Includes details of the project, including number of lanes, inter- sections and other major features. ___1_ _ _ general alignments) Cloverdale Rd, Overland Rd 1 1-84� ° i ecrzn EM Construction Widen roadway from 213 lanes to 3 lanes, including curb, gutter, EL I M sidewalk and bike lanes. Project is scheduled to coordinate with the City of Boise's sewer installation. Project includes intersection ITD vaxK _ widening at Cloverdale and Overland. ; 1-84 , 1 Preliminary Development Projects 1 1 SD } F State Highway Construction Year. 2005 k STP -E i ACHD Portion: $827,315 � Surface Transportation Program — Rural (Federal Aid) '..-� Lu Surface Transportation Program Urban (Federal Aid) w Project Total: $1,927,3 Transportation Improvement Program O Construction is Unfunded, Design and/or Right-of-way in FYWP 1-8 OVERLAND RD Project Schedule and Cost Information: Only the Construction year is designated for each project. Typically, design of the project is conducted two years prior to construction and right-of-way is acquired one year prior. ACHD utilizes outside funding sources for many projects, including Federal Aid and contributions from the cities, county and private interests. The ACHD Portion depicts the amount of ACHD-related funds that are estimated to be used for the project. The Project Total reflects the combi- nation of outside funding and ACHD funding. Cost estimates are approximate and are subject to change on an annual basis. Common Acronyms & Abbreviations CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (Federal Aid) Const or CN Construction FA Federal Aid I M Interstate Maintenance Program (Federal Aid) ITD Idaho Transportation Department ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems PD Preliminary Development Projects R/W Right -of -Way SD Storm Drain SH State Highway STIP LTD's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program STP -E Surface Transportation Program — Enhancement (Federal Aid) STP -R Surface Transportation Program — Rural (Federal Aid) STP -U Surface Transportation Program Urban (Federal Aid) TIP Transportation Improvement Program OF Construction is Unfunded, Design and/or Right-of-way in FYWP 1-8 SECTION 2; Major Individual Projects Table of Contents Page No. Construction Year Project ROADWAY PROGRAM Arterial Roadway Projects 2-1 2008 30th Street Extension, Main / Rose 2-1 PD 36th Street Extension, Cartwright 1 Bogus Basin Rd 2-1 2008 36th Street, Hill Rd 1 Cartwright Rd 2-2 OF Cloverdale Rd, Fairview Ave/ Ustick Rd 2-2 2010 Cloverdale Rd, Franklin / Fairview 2-2 2007 Eagle Rd, Victory Rd 1 Ridenbaugh Canal 2-3 PD FairviewAve Pavement Rehab ##2 (Cole/ Milwaukee) 2-3 OF Fairview Ave, Cloverdale Rd / Five Mile Rd 2-3 OF Fairview Ave, Eagle Rd / Cloverdale Rd 2-4 PD Fairview Ave, Five Mile Rd / Maple Grove Rd 2-4 OF Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd 2-4 OF Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd 1 Locust Grove Rd 2-5 2008 Five Mile Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave 2-5 2009 Five Mile Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd 2-5 2009 Floating Feather Rd, Eagle Rd / Edgewood Dr 2-6 2009 Franklin Rd, Touchmark Rd / Five Mile Rd 2-6 PD Franklin Rd, Black Cat Rd /Ten Mile Rd 2-6 2010 Franklin Rd, Ten Mile Rd 1 Linder Rd 2-7 2009 Linder Rd, Franklin Rd / Ustick 2-7 2006 Locust Grove Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave 2-7 2006 Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd 1 Franklin Rd Overpass 2-8 2006 Maple Grove Rd Extension, McMillan Rd / Chinden Blvd 2-8 2006 Maple Grove Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave 2-8 OF Maple Grove Rd, Fairview Ave f Ustick Rd 2-9 2007 Maple Grove, Fairview / Goddard 2-9 OF Meridian Downtown Transportation Improvements 2-9 2006 Overland Rd, Cloverdale Rd / Five Mile Rd 2-10 2006 Overland Rd, Topaz Ave I Cloverdale Rd 2-10 2007 Overland Rd, Linder Rd I Meridian 2-10 2007 Ten Mile Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Cherry Lane 2-11 2008 Ten Mile Rd, Cherry Lane / Ustick Rd 2-11 OF Three Cities River Crossing (Corridor Study) 2-11 2007 Ustick Rd, Five Mile I Cole Rd 2-12 OF Ustick Rd, Cloverdale Rd / Five Mile Rd Collector Roadway Projects 2-13 OF Adams St, Veterans Parkway to Chinden (US 20126) via 36th/37th 2-13 2006 Highland St, Broadway Ave / ParkCenter Blvd 2-13 2009 Hill Rd Extension, Horseshoe Bend Rd (SH 55) / State St 2-14 PD Warm Springs Ave - Phase 1 2-14 PD Warm Springs Ave, Phase 2 2-14 PD Warm Springs Ave, Phase 3 2-15 PD Warm Springs Ave, Phase 4 2-15 PD Warm Springs Ave, Phase 5 INTERSECTION PROGRAM Intersection New/ Re -build Projects 2-16 2008 36th Street and Hill Rd and Catalpa 2-16 PD Amity and Ten Mile 2-16 PD Avenue D / E; 03rd Street / 04th Street; Bridge Ave (Kung) 2-17 2007 FairviewAve and Cloverdale Rd 2-17 PD Fairview Ave and Cole Rd Intersection 2-17 2010 Franklin Rd and Allumbaugh St 2-18 2010 Franklin Rd and Liberty St 2-18 PD Gowen Rd and Pleasant Valley 2-18 2009 Hill Rd and Edgewood 2-19 2009 Hill Rd and SH 55 2-19 2009 Hill Rd and State St 2-19 PD _ Main (E 01st St) and Waltman & Meridian and Central 2-20 2010 Maple Grove Rd and Franklin 2-20 2008 Maple Grove Rd and Hackamore 2-20 2007 Maple Grove Rd and Ustick 2-21 2006 Orchard St and Overland Rd 2-21 2007 Overland Rd and Meridian Rd (SH69) 2-21 2009 Pine Ave and Linder Rd 2-22 PD SH 441 State St / Ballantyne Realignment 2-22 2006 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Deer Flat Rd 2-22 2009 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Victory Rd 2-23 PD State St and Bogart Lane 2-23 2007 Ten Mile Rd and Franklin Rd 2-23 2007 Ten Mile Rd and Pine Ave 2-24 2008 Ustick Rd and Linder Rd 2-24 2007 Ustick Rd and Milwaukee 2-24 2007 Victory Rd and Cloverdale Rd 2-25 2007 Victory Rd and Eagle Rd Intersection Signalization Projects 2-26 2008 03rd Street and Myrtle - Signalization 2-26 PD Federal Way and Victory 2-26 2007 Hill Rd and Horseshoe Bend Rd 2-27 PD Legend and McMillian 2-27 2008 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Columbia BRIDGE PROGRAM Major Bridge Projects 2-28 2010 Cloverdale Rd Bridge#344 2-28 2006 Cole Rd Bridge #350 2-28 2006 Desert Ave Bridge #347 2-29 2010 Fairview Ave #418a & #418aa 2-29 PD Liberty St Bridge #409 2-29 PD Old Horseshoe Bend Rd #42a 2-30 2010 ParkCenter Blvd—East River Crossing Bridge Rehab, Replacement and Rail Projects 2-31 PD Cloverdale #135 2-31 2009 King Road Bridge #336 2-31 2010 Lake Hazel #304 2-32 PD PD Bridge Rehab, Replacement and Rail Program 2-32 2007 Robinson Rd #184, S 1 O Kuna-Mora 2-32 2010 Victory Rd, 1 14 mile east of Locust Grove #296 2-33 2008 Wylie Lane # 93 COMMUNITY PROGRAM Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Projects - Individual Projects 2-34 2007 01 st Street W, Washington 1 Cherry Lane 2-34 2008 08th Street, 1400 W 8th 1 Cherry Lane 2-34 2006 42nd St, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) / Adams St - RSP 2-35 2006 51 st Street, Alworth 1 Boise River 2-35 OF Catalpa, Collister Dr/ Hawthorne 2-35 2006 Highland, 1016 West 2-36 2006 Lubkin, Bruins / Curtis Frontage and Bruins, Lubkin 1 Northview 2-36 OF Preece Dr. N side, Cole I Ethridge 2-36 2006 Roosevelt St, 1-84 / NY Canal - RSP 2-37 2007 Roosevelt St, Bethel l W. Emerald 2-37 2007 Warm Springs / Granite Way / Penitentiary Enhancement Project This Page Left Blank Intentionally j FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 30th Street Extension Main I Rose Construct new 5 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes based on 2002 Concept Report (Alternative C). Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes traffic signal at State St. and Rose. Includes main connection to Greenbelt and possible pedestrian signal. Construction Year: 2008 W ACHD Portion: $4,215,000 n Previous Expenditures $300,000 Project Total. $4,515,000 RD202-09 .r i 36th Street Extension, Cartwright 1 Bogus Basin Rd Construct new 2 -lane roadway, including safety shoulder and bike lanes, no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Acquire 50 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $2,654,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $2,654,000 36th Street, Hill Rd 1 Cartwright Rd Reconstruct existing roadway to 2 and 3 lanes, including curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Construct new 2- and 3- lane roadway from end of 36th Street to Cartwright. Acquire 68 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year 2008 ACHD Portion: $1,303,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $1,303,000 12/28/2004 2-1 Cloverdale Rd, Fairview Ave 1 Ustick Rd Widen roadway from 2 to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $4,763,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $4,763,000 Cloverdale Rd, Franklin / Fairview Widen roadway from 213 lanes to 5 lanes, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 right-of-way. Fairview & Cloverdale intersection is listed as a separate project programmed in 2007. Construction Year. 2010 ACHD Portion: $5,279,0.00 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $5,279,000 Eagle Rd, Victory Rd 1 Ridenbaugh Canal Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 fleet of right-of-way. Victory and Eagle intersection project programmed concurrently. Construction Year.- 2007 ACHDPortion: $1,592,000 Previous Expenditures $736,000 Project Totai: $2,328,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 1212812004 2-2 Fairview Ave Pavement Rehab #2 (Cole I Milwaukee) Pavement rehabilitation project is to be completed with the Fairview/Cole intersection, which is scheduled PD. Construction Year: PD ACRD Portion: $1,049,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $1,049,000 Fairview Ave, Cloverdale Rd 1 Five Mile Rd Widen roadway from 5 to 7 lanes and complete curb, gutter and sidewalk system. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $5,230,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $5,230,000 Fairview Ave, Eagle Rd 1 Cloverdale Rd Widen roadway from 5 to 7 lanes and complete curb, gutter and sidewalk system. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $5,230,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $5,230,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-3 Fairview Ave, Five Mile Rd 1 Maple Grove Rd Widen roadway from 5 to 7 lanes and complete curb, gutter and sidewalk system. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $5,230,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $5,230,000 Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd I Eagle Rd Widen roadway from 5 to 7 lanes and complete curb, gutter and sidewalk system. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $5,230,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $5,230,000 Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd 1 Locust Grove Rd Widen roadway from 5 to 7 lanes and complete curb, gutter and sidewalk system. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $5,230,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $5,230,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-4 Five Mile Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave HOT PROJECT - Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Five Mile and Fairview. Construction Year.• 2008 ACHD Portion: $498,000 Previous Expenditures $847,000 Project Total: $7,785,000 Five Mile Rd, Fairview Ave 1 !)stick Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year: 2009 ACHD Portion: $4,948,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $4,948,000 Floating Feather Rd, Eagle Rd / Edgewood Dr Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year: 2009 ACHD Portion: $1,348,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $1,348,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/2812004 2-5 Franklin Rd, Touchmark Rd / Five Mile Rd HOT PROJECT - Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks and shoulder. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Franklin/Five Mile and Fran klin/Cloverdale. Construction Year. • 2009 ACHD Portion: $655,000 Previous Expenditures $737,000 Project Total: $8,732,000 Franklin Rd, Black Cat Rd / Ten Mile Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96' of right-of-way. Project is on a designated Interstate 84 ITS Detour Route. Construction Year: PID ACHD Portion: $528,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $6,693,000 Franklin Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way, Project is on a designated Interstate 84 ITS Detour Route. Construction Year.- 2010 ACHD Portion: $1,043,000 Previous Expenditures $150,000 Project Total: $6,088,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 0610 12/28/2004 2-6 Linder Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Ustick Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Linder & Chateau. Construction Year.- 2009 ACRD Portion: $8,628,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $8,628,000 Locust Grove Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave Widen existing roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Construct new 5 -lane roadway across railroad tracks south of Pine to Lanark. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $2,563,000 Previous Expenditures $1,799,000 Project Total: $4,,362,000 Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd 1 Franklin Rd Overpass HOT PROJECT --Construct new overpass over 1-84 from north of Overland to Bentley. The overpass will be 4 lanes and connecting roadways will be 5 lanes. Bentley to Franklin widening is part of separate project. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $185,000 Previous Expenditures $1,890,000 Project Total: $6,955,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-7 Maple Grove Rd Extension, McMillan Rd 1 Chinden Blvd NOT PROJECT --Construct new 5 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Maple Grove/McMillan and GarrettlChinden. 2006-2010 FYWP funds are for completion of construction in 2006. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $1,115,000 Previous Expenditures $5,986,000 Project Total: $7,101,000 Maple Grove Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Fairview Ave HOT PROJECT - Widen roadway from 3 lanes to 5 lanes with bike lanes, curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Emerald and Fairview. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $339,000 Previous Expenditures $3,474,000 Project Total: $8,401,000 Maple Grove Rd, Fairview Ave 1 Ustick Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 3 lanes, including bike lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalks. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Cory and Northview. Storm drain project for Ustick, Five Mile/Cole will allow for 3 -lane section and temporary pedestrian facilities. Construction Year. OF ACHD Portion: $3,416,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $3,416,000 1;... FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12!2812004 2-8 Maple Grove, Fairview I Goddard THIS PROJECT IS PART OF THE USTICK, FIVE MILE/COLE PROJECT. Storm drain will be constructed along Maple Grove, allowing minor pavement widening to accommodate 3 lanes and installation of temporary pedestrian system. Please see Ustick description for scheduling and cost. Construction Year., 2007 ACHD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 Meridian Downtown Transportation Improvements Design of projects(s) in PD as identified in the Meridian Downtown Transportation Study. See Appendix for details. Construction Year.• UF ACHD Portion: $500,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $500,000 Overland Rd, Cloverdale Rd 1 Five Mile Rd Widen the roadway from 3 lanes to 5 lanes including curb, gutter and sidewalks. Project designed for constrained 80 -foot right-of-way. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $1,096,000 Previous Expenditures $332,000 Project Total: $1,428,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 NO MAP AVAILABLE 12/2812004 2-9 Overland Rd, Topaz Ave 1 Cloverdale Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Developer constructed section from Eagle Rd to Topaz in 2004. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $970,000 Previous Expenditures $807,000 Project Total: $1,777,000 Overland Rd, Linder Rd 1 Meridian Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 -lane rural section, with bike lanes and detached sidewalk. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way. Project includes intersection work at Stoddard. Construction Year.• 2007 ACHD Portion: $4,080,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $4,080,000 Ten Mile Rd, Franklin Rd 1 Cherry Lane Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes including curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Acquire 96' right-of-way. Project includes signalization and widening of intersections at Ten Mile & Franklin to 5 lanes on all legs and Ten Mile & Pine. Construction Year: 2007 ACHD Portion: $4,529,000 Previous Expenditures $853,000 Project Total: $5,$82,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-10 Ten Mile Rd, Cherry Lane 1 Ustick Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 415 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 96 feet of right-of-way where possible. Project includes intersection work at Ten Mile and Ustick. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $5,062,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total.• $5,062,000 Three Cities River Crossing (Corridor Study) HOT PROJECT -This study will determine the centerline location and obtain environmental approvals for a Boise River crossing between Chinden Boulevard (US 20126) and State Street (SH 44) in the Boise - Eagle -Garden City area. The project is in the long range transportation plan, Destination 2025. 2007 funds are for corridor preservation while PD funds are for potential design. Construction Year OF ACHD Portion: $36,120,000 Previous Expenditures $1,659,000 Project Total: $,40,259,000 Ustick Rd, Five Mile 1 Cole Rd Widen roadway from 213 lanes to 5 lanes with bike lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalks. Acquire 82 feet of right-of-way for constrained section to mitigate impacts on neighborhood and utilities. Project includes intersection work at Milwaukee and Maple Grove, as well as storm drain work on Maple Grove, Fairview/Goddard. Construction Year.- 2007 ACHD Portion: $7,804,000 Previous Expenditures $2,096,000 Project Total: $9,900,00() FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-11 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Ustick Rd, Cloverdale Rd 1 Five Mile Rd Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Roadway design should be consistent with West Valley Community Center Plan, adopted September 2002. Construction Year., OF ACRD Portion: $5,298,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $5,298,000 12/28/2004 2-12 if FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Adams St, Veterans Parkway to Chinden (US 20126) via ` ,l "�5 36th/37th PARK Widen roadway from 2 lanes to 3 lanes, including curb, gutter and sidewalk. Construct new connection between 36th and 37th Street.'`.e�`°:tel w� Construction Year: OF � ,acs ACHD Portion: $2,960,000,/<��� ( J!) Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $2,560,000\QcJ� �'/t RD101_ it Highland St, Broadway Ave 1 ParkCenter Blvd Rebuild 2 -lane roadway with curb, gutter and sidewalk. No right-of-way acquisition required. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $1,032,000 Previous Expenditures $5,000 Project Total. $1,037,000 Hill Rd Extension, Horseshoe Bend Rd (SH 55) / State St Construct new alignment of existing roadway west of SH -55 to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes. Acquire 70 feet of right-of- way. Project includes three possible traffic signals - at State, Edgewood and SH -55 Construction Year. 2049 ACHD Portion: $4,754,000 Previous Expenditures $150,000 Project Total: $4,904,000 12/28/2004 2-13 Warm Springs Ave - Phase 1 Area 5 - Easternmost section, including retaining wall. Construct arches designating entry into Historic Warm Springs Ave, placement of interpretive plaques at arches, bicycle and pedestrian improvements at intersection of Granite Way I Old Penitentiary and Warm Springs. Project also includes the landscaping of an oval with ACHD's proposed roundabout at the intersection. Construction Year: Pp ACHD Portion: $387,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $3$7,000 Warm Springs Ave, Phase 2 Area 4 - East/central section, including soil -nail wall. Construction Year. PD ACHD Portion: $387,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $387,000 Warm Springs Ave, Phase 3 Area 3 - Central section with soil -nail wall. Construction Year: Pp ACHD Portion: $387,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $387,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-14 Warm Springs Ave, Phase 4 Area 2 - West/central section with soil -nail wall. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $387,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $387,000 Warm Springs Ave, Phase 5 Area 1 - Westernmost section, west of Starcrest Drive, lay back slope. Construction Year. PD ACHD Portion: $387,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $387,000 t FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-15 36th Street and Hill Rd and Catalpa HOT PROJECT --Realign Hill Road to create two three-way intersections with 36th Street. Proposed Catalpa realignment to include connection to Hill Rd via Bonnie Lane. Two new traffic signals will be installed. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $3,049,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $3,049,000 Amity and Ten Mile Construct 5 lanes on each leg and signalize intersections. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $853,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $853,000 Avenue D 1 E; 03rd Street / 04th Street; Bridge Ave (Kuna) Modify alignment to improve operation resulting from current configuration. Construction Year. PD ACHD Portion: $299,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $299,000 12128/2004 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 r - ,.w PARK HILLSIDE JR HIGH PROPOSED SCHOOLS WATH ST W � W . 3RD ST 2ND ST L� o Ni h !Ogcicr PARK c11 lglz 2-16 Fairview Ave and Cloverdale Rd Reconstruct and widen intersection to 7 lanes on Fairview legs and 6 lanes on Cloverdale legs. Project includes addition of bike lanes on Cloverdale as well as curb, gutter and sidewalks. Construction in advance of Cloverdale, Franklin/Fairview. Construction Year.- 2007 ACHD Portion: $2,713,000 Previous Expenditures $207,000 Project Total: $2,920,000 Fairview Ave and Cole Rd Intersection HOT PROJECT --Reconstruct and widen intersection to 7 lanes on each leg. Schedule of project dependent upon redevelopment in the area. Right-of-way to be acquired through corridor preservation. Construction Year.- PD ACHD Portion: $1,968,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $1,568,000 Franklin Rd and Atlumbaugh St Widen approach legs to 5 lanes on Franklin and 3 lanes on Allumbaugh. Project is planned to be designed to Federal Aid standards in preparation for potential increse in Federal allocation. Construction Year: 2010 ACHD Portion: $886,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $886,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-17 Franklin Rd and Liberty St Install left turn lanes on Franklin and modify Liberty legs. Project is planned to be designed to Federal Aid standards in preparation for potential increse in Federal allocation. Construction Year: 2010 ACHD Portion: $856,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $856,000 Gowen Rd and Pleasant Valley Project will install traffic control at one or both intersections, and possible realignment of Pleasant Valley to form a single intersection with Farman. Construction Year.• Pp ACHD Portion: $932,000 Previous Expenditures $36,000 Project Total: $968,000 Hill Rd and Edgewood Project programmed with Hill Rd Extension, SH551 State (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year.• ACHD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 0610 12/28/2004 2-18 Hill Rd and SH 55 Project programmed with Hill Rd Extension, SH551 State (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year: ACRD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 Hill Rd and State St Project programmed with Hill Rd Extension, SH551 State (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year: ACHD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 Main (E 01st St) and Waltman & Meridian and Central Ultimate design will be directed by the outcome of the Downtown Meridian Transportation study. Cost estimate is based on previous design. Construction Year. PID ACHD Portion: $600,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $600,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-19 Maple Grove Rd and Franklin Rebuild Intersection and add turn lanes to Maple Grove legs. Construction Year: 2010 ACHD Portion: $1,499,000 Previous Expenditures $150,000 Project Total. $1,649,000 Maple Grove Rd and Hackamore Construct turn lanes on Maple Grove and install signal. Due to location adjacent to overpass at 1-84, a fill or wall will be required. Construction Year.• 2008 ACHD Portion: $734,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $734,000 Maple Grove Rd and Ustick Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on all legs. Project programmed with Ustick, Five Mile/Cale project (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year: ACHD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-20 Orchard St and Overland Rd Install left turn lanes on Orchard legs of intersection. Some signal work will be required. Construction Year.• 2006 ACHD Portion: $460,000 Previous Expenditures $309,000 Project Total: $769,000 Overland Rd and Meridian Rd (SH69) Widen and improve the intersection to 7 lanes on all legs. Project is a cost -share with Idaho Transportation Department. Construction Year: 2007 ACHD Portion: $2,032,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $2,282,000 Pine Ave and Linder Rd Rebuild intersection and add left -turn lanes on all four legs. Project is adjacent to Meridian High School and programmed with Linder, Franklin/Ustick project. Construction Year: 2009 ACHD Portion: $323,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $323,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-21 SH 441 State St 1 Ballantyne Realignment Realign State Street and Ballantyne to connect to State Highway 44 west of current State Street intersection. Signalize intersection. Construction Year. PD ACHD Portion: $460,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $460,000 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Deer Flat Rd Signalize intersection. Cooperative project with Idaho Transportation Department. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $230,000 Previous Expenditures $50,000 Project Total: $280,000 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Victory Rd Widen Victory Road legs to 4 lanes and install signal. ITD coordination will 6e required. Construction Year: 2009 ACHD Portion: $331,000 Previous Expenditures $75,000 Project Total: $406,Q00 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2044 2-22 State St and Bogart Lane Install signal, realign intersection & install sidewalk. Installation of signal dependent upon ITD approval. Construction Year: Pp ACHD Portion: $555,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $555,000 Ten Mile Rd and Franklin Rd Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on all legs. Project programmed with Ten Mile, Franklin/Cherry project (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year. ACHD Portion: -$0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 Ten Mile Rd and Pine Ave Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on Ten Mile and 3 lanes on Pine. Pine alignment west of Ten Mile Road is a private roadway. Project programmed with Ten Mile, Pine / Cherry Lane project (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year: ACHD Portion: $0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $0 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-23 Ustick Rd and Linder Rd Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on all legs. Includes installation of traffic signal. Project programmed in advance of Linder, Franklin to Ustick project. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $1,559,000 Previous Expenditures $20,000 Project Total: $1,579,000 Ustick Rd and Milwaukee Project programmed with Ustick, Five Mile 1 Cole (See roadway project for construction schedule. Costs are included in roadway project). Construction Year. ACHD Portion: -$0 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total., $0 Victory Rd and Cloverdale Rd Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on all legs, including curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Includes installation of traffic signal. Construction Year: 2007 ACHD Portion: $971,000 Previous Expenditures $209,000 Project Total. $1,180,000 f FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-24 Victory Rd and Eagle Rd Reconstruct and widen intersection to 5 lanes on all legs, including curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Project programmed with Eagle Rd, Victory/Ridenbaugh Canal project. Construction Year., 2007 ACHDPortion: $1,662,000 Previous Expenditures $651,000 Project Total. $2,313,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-25 03rd Street and Myrtle - Signalization Install signal at intersection to provide connectivity for bicyclists and pedestrians to the Greenbelt and BSU. ITa is the lead agency. Construction Year., 2008 ACHD Portion: $65,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $65,000 Federal Way and Victory Signalize intersection, Construction Year., Pp ACHD Portion: $204,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $204,000 Hill Rd and Horseshoe Bend Rd Intersection was rebuilt in 1999 and requires installation of signal. Construction Year., 2007 ACHD Portion: $243,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $243,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-26 AGENDA JOINT MEETING — CITY OF MERIDIANIACHD COMMISSION April 4, 2005 Noon ACHD Auditorium 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho Discussion - Downtown Meridian Transportation Study Elected Officials Boundaries of Impact l=ee Service Areas Meridian (Siddoway) Discussion - Detached Sidewalks Meridian (Siddoway) ** TX Ca. IMATION REPORT x* AS OF APR 03 '05r .5 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDti STATUS 02 04/03 17:55 3810160 EC --S 00'44" 001 184 OK 03 04/03 17:57 PUBLIC WORKS EC --S 00'30" 001 184 CK 04 04/03 17:58 8841159 EC --S 00'31" 201 1B4 CK 05 04/03 17:59 2088840744 EC --S 00'30" 001 184 OK 06 04/03 18:00 POLICE DEPT EC --S 00'29" 001 184 OK 07 04/03 18:01 8985501 EC --5 00'29" 001 184 OK 08 04/03 18:22 LIBRARY EC --S 00'37" 001 184 OK 09 04/03 18:03 3885924 EC --S 00'29" 201 184 CK 10 04/03 18:04 P -AND -Z EC --S 00'29" 001 184 OK 11 04/03 18:05 208 895 0390 EC --S ew u,, 001 184 OK 12 04/03 18106 128300040 G3 --S 00'33" 081 184 OK 13 04/03 18.07 208 387 6393 EC --S 00'30" 001 184 OK 14 $4/03 18:08 ADA CTY DEUELMT EC --S 00139" 001 184 CK 15 04/03 18:09 8885052 EC --S 00'30" 001 184 OK 16 04/03 18:10 CHERRY LANE G3--5 00'45" 001 184 OK 17 04/03 18:12 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC --S 00'30" 001 184 OK le 04/03 18:13 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC --S 00'29" 001 184 OK 19 04/03 18:14 2088886701 EC --S 00'28" 001 184 CK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY ui• Cys" ` IDAHO } � MAYOR 1 NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP t MEETING Tammy de Weerd CITYCOTJNC1l.I4 Fm8Pr5 Keith Bird Christine Donnell Charlc+g M. Rountree Shaun Wardle MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's Auditorium, 5775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, April 4, 2005 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing planning and service issues and items concerning both agencies such as: detached sidewalks, — impact fee area boundary, -- update on downtown Meridian. The public is welcome to attend. DATED this 'I st day of April, 2005. BEAL WILLIAM G. BERG,RK - 1 . . �sr Meridian Crly Council Spacial Joint Meeting with ACRD Commissioners - AprU 4, 20015 AU materials presented of public mestings shall become the properryof tho City &Meridian. Anyone dasr'dng accommodafion for disoblIfts rolated to documents and /or hearings, ploaso contarl the Administration ofAda County Highway AisWcf at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the pubtin meeting. CITY HAT.], 33 EAST IDAHO AVENTJG MMD1AA1, IDA1 TO 83642 (208)888- 443,3 CITY CLPHK-FAxr:7:5•a?]8 C17Y A71T)ul.}EY/fiR-FAX BB"SM FINANCE31 Cir111TY OILUNG-FAX F6? -5613 MAYOR'50"ICE-FAX884•811, MAW on r�yclyd paper crrY oF,'lia IDAHO �c - �9il3 MAYOR NOTICE OF SPECIAL. JOINT WORKSHOP i MEETING Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Christine Donnell Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS Tire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234 / fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579 / fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533 / fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678 / 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500 / fax 898-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211 / fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191 / fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242 / fax 884.1159 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, April 4, 2005 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing planning and service issues and items concerning both agencies such as: detached sidewalks, M impact fee area boundary, update on downtown Meridian. The public is welcome to attend. `'' 40 k DATED this 1st day of April, 2005. WILLIAM G. BERG, - . I V RK 4 Nin , YS Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — April 4, 2005 All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and /or hearings, please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK - FAX 888-4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR - FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper L� IM IDAHO �f �c��`frta �7�1;l;��SLI11=V��`Y 5311EE 1909 MAYOR f NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP / MEETING Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Christine Donnell Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234 / fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579 / fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533 / fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678 / 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500 / fax 898-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211 / fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191 /fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242 / fax 884-1159 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL $i ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, April 4, 2005 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing planning and service issues and items Concerning both agencies such as: ^- detached sidewalks, impact fee area boundary, M update on downtown Meridian. The public is welcome to attend. 61!pt . . DATED this 1 st day of April, 2005. BEAL f� a . a WILLIAM G. BERG,- I RK� FJ Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — April 4, 2005 All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings, please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-5900 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK —FAX 888-4218 CITY ATTORNEY/ 1-[R —FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING —.FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE —FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper r IDAHO 7rREASURE V u1 Y SIIICk 1903 MAYOR NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP 1 MEETING Taramy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Christine Donnell Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234 / fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. bower Street 888-3579 / fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533 / fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower lane 888-6678 / 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500 / fax 898-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Shite 150 887-2211 / fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191 /fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242 / fax 884-1159 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will hold a Special Joint Workshop at,the Ada County Highway District's Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, April 4, 2005 at 72.00 noon. They will be discussing planning and service issues and items concerning both agencies such as: detached sidewalks, impact fee area boundary, update on downtown Meridian. The public is welcome to attend. 5ea,4W&q DATED this 1 st day of April, 2005. BEALM V WILLIAM G. BERG, A. - I RK . Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACRD Commissioners — April 4, 2005 All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings, please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33.EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK -FAX 888-4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR -FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING -FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE -FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper Will Berg io�neono From: Christine Donnell [donnelibc@spro.net] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:36 AM To: bergw@meridiancity.org Subject: Re: NOTICE OF SPECIAL .JOINT MEETING Will, I have a meeting in Middleton this morning and may not be able to be at the Joint ACHD meeting. If I finish in time to get to Garden City, I will try even if I am a little late. I have emailed the Mayor as well. Thanks. C. Bill and Christine Will Berg From: Tara Green Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8.52 AM To: (s529@givenspursley.com); Amanda Alvaro (r553@su nval ley. net), Anna Canning (canninga@meridiancity.org); Ashley Ford (abf@wrgd.com); Barb Shiffer (shifferb@meridiancity.org); Becca Zanders; Bill Musser (musserb@meddiancity.org); Bill Nary (Bill Nary); Blake Campbell (campbelb@meridiancity.org); Bob Chandler (memorial monuments@msn.com); Brad Hawkins -Clark (hawkinsb@meddiancity.org); Brad Miller (bmiller@vanauker.com); Brad Watson (watsonb@meridiancity.org); Brian O. (briano@whitepeterson.com); Bruce Freckleton (freckleb@meridiancity.org); Bruce Mills (Bmills@achd.ada.id.us); Catrina Thomas (thomasc@ meridian city. org); Charlie Rountree (cmrountree@aol.com); Charlie Rountree (crountre(,m' itd.state.id.us); Christine Donnell (donnellbc@spro.net); Christine Donnell (donnellc@meddiancity.org); Clair Bowman (cmbavalon@safelink.net); Clint Dolsby (dolsbyc@ meridian city. org); Craig Hood (hoodc@meridiancity.org); Dave McKinnon (dmekinnon@congergroup.com); David Turnbull (dtumbull@brightoncorp.com); Dean Willis (mdwillis'l@msn.com); Diane Stewart (stewartd@meridiancity.org); Doug Strong (stro ngd@ meridian city. org); Elroy Huff (huffe@meridiancity.org); Gary Buentgen (garyc@icrelle.com); Gary Inselman; Gerry Mattison (gwmattis@[IBK.Net); Guy Levingston; Jared (fared@ buttefence.com); Jennifer Campbell Qcampbell@intgas.com); Jessica Johnson Oohnsonj c@meridiancity.org); Joe Guenther (guenthej@meridiancity.org); Joe Silva (silvaj@meridiancity.org); John Overton (overtonj@meridiancity.org); Josh Wilson (wilsonj@meddiancity.org); Kade Glenn (glen n k@meridian city.org); Kathleen Kreller (kkreller@idahostatesman.com); Keith Borup (keithborup@cableone.net); Kenny Bowers (bowersk@merldiancity.org); Kristy Vigil (vigilk@meridian city.org); Machelle Hill (hillm@meridiancity.org); Michelle Albertson; Mike Ford (mikeford@yankemachine.com); Mini Victory (myvictory@IIBK.net); Nina Barton (NBarton@achd.ada.id.us); Patricia Nilsson (pnilsson@compassidaho.org); Rick Clinton (clintonrc@meridiancity. org); Rob Sower (rob@spraguesolutions.com); Shari Stiles (es-sharis@gwest.net); Shaun Wardle (shaunwardle@yahoo.com); Sheline Bell (sheline_bell@mcgraw-hili.com); Sonya Allen (allens c@meddiancity.org); Stacy Kilchenmann (kitchens@meridiancity.org); Steve Arnold(ArnoldSteven@stanleygroup.com); Steve Harding (steve@hardingandcompany.com); Steve Siddoway (siddowas@meddiancity.org); Susan Slaughter (sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us); Tammy de Weerd (Tammy de Weerd); Ted Baird (Ted Baird); Terry Smith (smithpark@aol.com); Vickie Woods (vwoods@baileyengineers.com); Will Berg (bergw@meridiancity.org) Subject: 4-4-05 ACHD Special Jt. Mtg. xh: uity Lounczi Meeting Will Berg From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:52 PM To: bergw@ci.meddian.id.us Cc: Tammy de Weerd ; 'Anna Canning'; 'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting rage i or Will, Here is another potential agenda item for the joint meeting, per my discussion with Mayor De Weerd yesterday. Impact Fee Area Boundary: We want to open the dialogue about shifting the impact fee area boundary. Currently the impact fee area boundary is drawn at Eagle Road. Properties on the east side of Eagle Road are in the same area as Garden City and Downtown Boise. Therefore, impact fees from projects like Crossroads Shopping Center, Redfeather Estates, etc. cannot be used for road needs in North Meridian. ACHD will be reevaluating the impact fee service area boundaries next year as part of their new 20 -year CIP. However, we need to start the discussion now so that ACHD is clearly aware of the City's desires. Steve �S'fev-e ,S"zddorar�y Pryu�&I Pl�aer �lezxdr�n. Pllrznxrr'u, f � �ar�y 660 0 V*0e,-Co� fie, .SWC -q ZOZ oerzd, , fiauo 456�z aoz:e z0C?88455M - P" ZOe Sc?,8 68%� -----Original Message ----- From: Steve Siddoway[mailto:siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: Tammy de Weerd' Cc: 'bergw@ci.meridian.id.us'; 'Anna Canning'; 'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Here are a couple of thoughts: Detached Sidewalks: The City's Comprehensive Plan requires detached sidewalks along arterial roads per Figure VI -4 on page 56. We are getting the detached sidewalks where they are constructed by new development. However, wheneverACHD builds a road widening project, they always put in (primarily) attached sidewalks. I say'primariiy', because along Overland, a couple of sections are detached where sidewalks were already detached prior to the project, but most areas are attached. I have attended several ACHD open houses to provide comments on the sidewalks (Eagle Rd., Franklin, Ten Mile) but am always met with the same issue—'we cannot detach the sidewalks because there is no one to maintain the parkway between the curb and sidewalk—but we'll look into it and get back to you.' I just saw plans on Friday of the Overland/Meridian project (98% complete) and again they show attached sidewalks along SH -69 (Meridian Road). This is very frustrating to me. I would like to see if we can work out a policy for ACHD to start building detached sidewalks along arterial roads whenever they do a road widening project. We have several coming up—Locust Grove, Overland extension, Eagle Road extension, Ten Mile, Linder, Franklin, etc. and it will be a real shame in my opinion if we lose this opportunity to detach the sidewalks. 3/30/2005 RE. City Council Meeting Yage 2 of 3 Downtown Meridian: I have an internal debate going on about whether this is the right time to debate funding for the Split Corridor head on. My gut feeling is that it is not the right time. I believe the best way to broach the subject is to hold off the formal on -record discussion until the plan is formally acceptedladopted by both agencies. Our position is strengthened if ACHD has adopted the plan. At this meeting, we should discuss the current status of the plan,.with the final draft being reviewed b ACHD and Cily staff and discuss the process to have the plan adopted by both entities. For our part, I will schedule the plan for public hearings as an addendum to Comprehensive Plan once it is deemed complete by both agencies' staff. It may also be appropriate to direct ACHD and City staff to prepare a presentation on the timing and funding options for the project for the following joint meeting. This will take some time to coordinate with ACHD staff, but I believe we can show that it is appropriate to move the design of "phase one" (Waltman to Franklin) into the FY06 ACHD budget. However, we need a final plan before seriously engaging such discussions; and as soon as I get comments from ACHD staff I will coordinate final edits with Tom and get the final product. i feel that we have nothing to gain and everything to lose right now if we get at loggerheads with the ACHD Commission. We have come so far in building consensus on a preferred alternative that works for both agencies, I think we need to carefully massage the funding issue behind the scenes for now. You might also mention that I am pleased to have been invited to help present the Downtown Meridian project with Terry tittle at the upcoming Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) conference. Feel free to call if you want to discuss these issues in further detail. Steve so sddow4v ,Pn> _q,az aaozow moz n Pzaxtniay cg Zo Xn�r 664 t�z �ocr Tans, 5tti�� z4z 04zidzav, Id o 400s4z aaw zo8a� ss � FaIr z6V88868 -----Original Message ----- From: Tammy de Weerd[mailto:deweerdt@meridiancity.org] Sent, Saturday, March 1.9, 2005 1.0:47 AM To: Will Berg; Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail) Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E- mail); Bili Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail); siddowas@merldiancity.org Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thanks for the reminder, Will. If anyone has items for the joint meeting with ACHD please let Will and know. Thanks. Tammy de Weerd, Mayor City of Meridian www.meridiancity.org (208) 888-4433 ext. 204 (208) 888-4218 fax 3/30/2005 lam: City Uounc>ii Meeting 3/30/2005 rage s or i From: Will Berg Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:51 AM To: Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail); Tammy de Weerd Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail) Subject: City Council Meeting Reminder: no City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2005 the next City Council Meeting will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005 joint meeting with Ada County Highway District Commissioners will be Monday, April 4th, 2005 at noon at A CHD KE:: Uity Uouncrl Meeting Will Berg From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:52 PM To: bergw@ci.meddian.id.us Cc: Tammy de Weerd';'Anna Canning;'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting rage t oz j Will, Here is another potential agenda item for the joint meeting, per my discussion with Mayor De Weerd yesterday. Impact Fee Area Boundary: We want to open the dialogue about shifting the impact fee area boundary. Currently the impact fee area boundary is drawn at Eagle Road. Properties on the east side of Eagle Road are in the same area as Garden City and Downtown Boise. Therefore, impact fees from projects like Crossroads Shopping Center, Redfeather Estates, etc. cannot be used for road needs in North Meridian. ACHD will be reevaluating the impact fee service area boundaries next year as part of their new 20 -year Cl P. However, we need to start the discussion now so that ACHD is clearly aware of the City's desires. Steve ,Si; 0r�e X ddoW;* Y- P��I Pl�un�r �I�xzdi�xz Pl�.uw.�y & ?-�z�zuy Plow Z009 get, Fix Z4&9 eee 6Iv5 -----Original Message ----- From: Steve Siddoway [malito:siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: Tammy de Weerd' Cc: 'bergw@ci.meridian.id.us'; 'Anna Canning'; 'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Here are a couple of thoughts: Detached Sidewalks: The City's Comprehensive Plan requires detached sidewalks along arterial roads per Figure VI -4 on page 56. We are getting the detached sidewalks where they are constructed by new development. However, wheneverACHD builds a road widening project, they always put in (primarily) attached sidewalks. I say 'primarily', because along Overland, a couple of sections are detached where sidewalks were already detached prior to the project, but most areas are attached. I have attended several ACHD open houses to provide comments on the sidewalks (Eagle Rd., Franklin, Ten Mile) but am always met with the same issue—`we cannot detach the sidewalks because there is no one to maintain the parkway between the curb and sidewalk—but we'll look into it and get back to you.' I just saw plans on Friday of the Overland/Meridian project (98% complete) and again they show attached sidewalks along SH -69 (Meridian Road). This is very frustrating to me. I would like to see if we can work out a policy for ACHD to start building detached sidewalks along arterial roads whenever they do a road widening project. We have several coming up—Locust Grove, Overland extension, Eagle Road extension, Ten Mile, Linder, Franklin, etc. and it will be a real shame in my opinion if we lose this opportunity to detach the sidewalks. 3/30/2005 RE: City Uounclt Meeting rage L 01 .5 Downtown Meridian: 1 have an internal debate going on about whether this is the right time to debate funding for the Split Corridor head on. My gut feeling is that it is not the right time. I believe the best way to broach the subject is to hold off the formal on -record discussion until the plan is formally acceptedfadopted by both agencies. Our position is strengthened if ACHD has adopted the plan. At this meeting, we should discuss the current status of the plan, with the final draft being reviewed b ACHD and City staff and discuss the process to have the plan adopted by both entities. For our part, I will schedule the plan for public hearings as an addendum to Comprehensive Plan once it is deemed complete by both agencies' staff. It may also be appropriate to direct ACHD and City staff to prepare a presentation on the timing and funding options for the project for the following joint meeting. This will take some time to coordinate with ACHD staff, but I believe we can show that it is appropriate to move the design of "phase one" (Waltman to Franklin) into the FY06 ACHD budget. However, we need a final plan before seriously engaging such discussions; and as soon as I get comments from ACHD staff I will coordinate final edits with Tom and get the final product. I feel that we have nothing to gain and everything to lose right now if we get at loggerheads with the ACHD Commission. We have come so far in building consensus on a preferred alternative that works for both agencies. I think we need to carefully massage the funding issue behind the scenes for now. You might also mention that I am pleased to have been invited to help present the Downtown Meridian project with Terry Little at the upcoming Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) conference. Feel free to call if you want to discuss these issues in further detail. Steve FSS siaaV avve Zoe ea,0 5F5,V Ar 20Y &&Y 6re,5�t, -----Original Message ----- From: Tammy de Weerd[mailto:deweerdt@meridiancity.org] Sent: Saturday, March 1.9, 2005 1.0:47 AM To: Will Berg; Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail) Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E- mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail), siddowas@meridiancity.org Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thanks for the reminder, Will. If anyone has items for the joint meeting with ACHD please let Will and I know. Thanks. Tammy de Weerd, Mayor City of Meridian www.meridiancity,a (208) 888-4433 ext. 20204, (208) 888-4,218 fax 3/30/2005 iiE: ulty uouncill meeting rage i or -i From: Will Berg Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:51 AM To: Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail), Shaun Wardle (E-mail); Tammy de Weerd Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Mary; Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail) Subject: City Council Meeting Reminder. no City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2005 the next City Council Meeting will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005 joint meeting with Ada County Highway District Commissioners will be Monday, April 4th, 2005 at noon at ACHD 3/30/2005 RE: City Council Meeting Will Berg From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@meddiancity.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: 'Tammy de Weerd' Cc: bergw@ci.meddian.id.us; 'Anna Canning'; 'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Here are a couple of thoughts: rage i oT l Detached Sidewalks: The City's Comprehensive Plan requires detached sidewalks along arterial roads per Figure VI -4 on page 56. We are getting the detached sidewalks where they are constructed by new development. However, whenever ACHD builds a road widening project, they always put in (primarily) attached sidewalks. I say 'primarily', because along Overland, a couple of sections are detached where sidewalks were already detached prior to the project, but most areas are attached. 1 have attended several ACHD open houses to provide comments on the sidewalks (Eagle Rd., Franklin, Ten Mile) but am always met with the same issue—'we cannot detach the sidewalks because there is no one to maintain the parkway between the curb and sidewalk—but we'll look into it and get back to you.' I just saw plans on Friday of the Overland/Meridian project (98% complete) and again they show attached sidewalks along SH -69 (Meridian Road). This is very frustrating to me. I would like to see if we can work out a policy for ACHD to start building detached sidewalks along arterial roads whenever they do a road widening project. We have several coming up—Locust Grove, Overland extension, Eagle Road extension, Ten Mile, Linder, Franklin, etc. and it will be a real shame in my opinion if we lose this opportunity to detach the sidewalks. Downtown Meridian: I have an internal debate going on about whether this is the right time to debate funding for the Split Corridor head on. My gut feeling is that it is not the right time. I believe the best way to broach the subject is to hold off the formal on -record discussion until the plan is formally accepted/adopted by both agencies. Our position is strengthened if ACHD has adopted the plan. At this meeting, we should discuss the current status of the plan, with the final draft being reviewed by ACHD and City staff and discuss the process to have the plan adopted by both entities. For our part, 1 will schedule the plan for public hearings as an addendum to Comprehensive Plan once it is deemed complete by both agencies' staff. It may also be appropriate to direct ACHD and City staff to prepare a presentation on the timing and funding options for the project for the following joint meeting. This will take some time to coordinate with ACHD staff, but I believe we can show that it is appropriate to move the design of "phase one" (Waltman to Franklin) into the FY06 ACHD budget. However, we need a final plan before seriously engaging such discussions; and as soon as i get comments from ACHD staff I will coordinate final edits with Tom and get the final product. I feel that we have nothing to gain and everything to lose right now if we get at loggerheads with the ACHD Commission. We have come so far in building consensus on a preferred alternative that works for both agencies. I think we need to carefully massage the funding issue behind the scenes for now. You might also mention that I am pleased to have been invited to help present the Downtown Meridian project with Terry Little at the upcoming Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) conference. Feel free to call if you want to discuss these issues in further detail. Steve S450W SWd"V221- Pxiucapal Pl�zi��x [�l�z�. Pl�nzny c� Zortz�� 660 tax �r I�z��, ..S'azi o ZOZ 3/30/2005 RE: City Council Meeting Yage :z of 2 ffo'_% Av' Idaho 8�` Z P.60xae Z08884,5'5N'Y Pam- z09e88 s8� -----Original Message ----- From: Tammy de Weerd[mailto:deweerdt@meridiancity.org] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:47 AM To: Will Berg; Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E- mail) Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail); siddowas@meridiancity.org Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thanks for the reminder, Will. If anyone has items for the joint meeting with ACRD please let Will and I know. Thanks. Tammy de Weerd, Mayor City of Meridian www.meridia� (208) 888-4433 ext. 204 (208) 888-4218 fax From: Will Berg Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:51 AM To: Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail); Tammy de Weerd Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E- mail) Subject: City Council Meeting Reminder.no City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2005 the next City Council Meeting will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005 joint meeting with Ada County Highway District Commissioners will be Monday, April 4th, 2005 at noon at ACHD 3/30/2005 Ada County Highway District Exhibit A Traffic Impact Fee Schedule By the Board of Highway District Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho: Huber, Eastlake, Bivens, Franden and Wynkoop RECEIVED 2005 City of Meridian City Clerk Office EXHIBITS A. EXHIBIT "A" Traffic Impact Fee Schedule B. EXHIBIT "B" ACHD Traffic Impact Fee Methodology C. EXHIBIT "C" ACRD Capital Improvements Plan Ordinance No. 200 EXHIBIT A ACHD Traffic Impact Fee Schedules Ordinance No. 200 � ���5 :-f,�� ::.:;: • ��i°� �f �}�1�� �, EXHIBIT A - Traffic impact Fee Schedule Service ,Area: 9 - NORTHWEST n ,� $otvice Area � AvOrage � ✓ ' VMT Cost A8'ti'stment:Fac{ors._=? Tn :den tf1 ....:PfefWork? 4' Service Area 7,50 0.384 i ^ a 501 - z Neighborhood Land Uses 25% I ITE TRIP RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ITE • 7th Edition(One-way) New Trip ITE PM Peak Hour x (Pass -By xto x Network mm Land Use Code Only) (rounded) RESIDENTIAL Per Dwelling Unit Single Family 210 0.505 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,517 Apartment 220 0.310 1.00 7.50 0.384 S1,043 $931 Residential CondolTownhouse 230 0.260 1,00 7.50 0.384 51,043 $781 Mobile Home 240 0.295 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $886 Hotel 310 0.295 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $886 Moiei 320 0.235 1.00 7.50 0.384 51,043 $706 Automobile Care Center 942 Per iii 1.690 0.72 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $3,655 Automobile Pars Sales 843 2.990 0.57 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $2,560 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22,870 0.53 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $9,127 Bultdtng Materials and Lumber 812 Business Park 770 2.245 0,645 0,74 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 51,043 $4,990 $1,043 $1,937 Church 560 Convenience Markel (24hrs) 851 0.330 26.205 1.00 3.75 0.384 0.39 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $496 $1,043 $7,695 Discount Club 861 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.120 2.530 0.77 7.50 0.384 0.83 7,50 0.384 $1,043 $4,903 51,043 $6,308 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 Furniture Stare 890 1.935 0.230 0.72 7.50 0.384 0.47 7.50 0,384 51,043 $4,185 51,043 $325 Garden Center! Nursery 817 Hardware/Paint Store 816 1.900 2.420 0.74 7.50 0.384 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $4,223 51,043 $5,379 Horne I mprovement Superstore 862 1.225 0.52 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,913 Hospital 610 0.590 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,772 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,292 Light Industrial 110 Manufacturing 140 0.490 0,370 1.00 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,472 S1,043 $1,111 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 7.50 0.384 S1,043 $390 New Car Sales 841 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 1.320 4.210 4.310 0.72 7.50 0.384 0.47 1.88 0.384 0.51 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $2,855 $1,043 $1,490 $1,043 $1,655 Restaurant • Fast Food wl drive-thru windo 934 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 17.320 5.460 0.50 1.88 0.384 0.57 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $6,521 $1,043 $4,674 Restaurant - Quality 931 Shopping Center 820 3.745 1.875 0.56 3.75 0.384 0.66 7,50 0.384 $1,043 $3,150 $1,043 $3,717 Specialty Retail 814 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 Tire Store 848 Warehousing 150 1.355 5.225 2.075 0.235 0.66 7.50 0.384 0.64 1.88 0.384 0.72 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 51,043 $2,686 $1,043 $2,518 S1,043 $4,488 $1,043 $706 • • General Office (Many Users) 710 Medical/Dental Office Bldg 720 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 111 0.745 1.00 7,50 0.384 $1,043 $2,236 1.860 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $5,587 0.750 1.00 7.50 0.384 1 1 $1,043 $2,253 Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling positior 945 Gas Station (vehicle fue€ing position) 944 IndicatedPer 6.690 6.930 0.44 1,88 0.384 0.58 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $2,216 $1,043 $3,026 Golf Course (Hale) 430 1.370 1.00 7.50 0.384 S1,043 $4,115 Movie Theater wl matinee (seat) 444 Public 0.035 1.00 7.50 0.384 51,043 W5 Park - City (acre) 411 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 Self -Service Car Wash Stall 947 0.072 2.595 2.770 1.00 3.75 0.384 0.58 1.88 0.384 0.58 1.88 0.384 51,043 $108 $1,043 $1,133 51,043 $1,210 Ordinance #200 Page A-1 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 2 - SOUTHWEST Service Area 8.38 0.383 Neighborhood Land Uses 50% 25% ITE TRIP RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ITE - 7th Edition (One -Way) New Trip ITE PM Peak Hour x (Pass -By x X Land Use Code Only) (rounded) Single Family 210 0.505 1.00 838 0.383 $862 $1,397 Apartment 220 0.310 1.00 8,38 0.383 $862 $858 Residential CondofTownhouse 230 0.260 1100 8.38 0.383 $862 $719 Mobile Home 240 0,295 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $816 7 Hotel 310 0.295 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $8 Motel 0.235 1.00 8.38 0.383 S862 0 7 $1.1 rrr Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 0-72 8.38 0.383 $862 $3,366 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2.990 0,57 4.19 0,383 $862 $2,358 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 0,53 2.10 0,383 $862 $8,404 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2,245 0.74 8.38 0.383 $862 $4,596 Business Park 770 0.645 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,784 Church 560 0.330 1.00 4.19 0.383 $862 $456 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 0.39 2.10 0.383 $862 $7,086 Discount Club 861 2.120 0.77 8.38 0.383 5862 $4,516 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 0,83 8.38 0.383 $862 $5,810 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 1.935 0.72 8.38 0.383 $862 $3,854 Furniture Store 890 0.230 0,47 8.38 0.383 $862 $299 Garden Center I Nursery 817 1.900 0,74 8.38 0,383 $862 $3,890 HardwareiPaint Store 816 2.420 0.74 8.38 0.383 $662 $4,954 Home Improvement Superstaro 862 1,225 0.52 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,762 Hospital 610 0.590 1.00 8,38 0.383 $862 $1,632 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,190 Light Industrial 110 0.490 1.00 838 0.383 $862 $1,356 Manufacturing 140 0.370 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,024 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $360 New Car Sales 841 1.320 0.72 8.38 0.383 $862 $2,629 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4.210 0A7 2.10 0.383 $862 $1,372 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 0,51 2.10 0.383 $862 $1,524 Restaurant - Fast Food w/ drive-thru windc 934 17.320 0,50 2.10 0.383 $862 $6,004 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 5,460 0,57 4.19 0.383 5862 $4.305 Restaurant - Quality 931 3,745 0,56 4.19 0.383 $862 $2,901 Shopping Center 820 1,875 0.66 8.38 0.383 $862 $3,424 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 0.66 8,38 0.383 $862 $2,474 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 6,225 0.64 2.10 0.383 $862 $2,318 Tire Store 848 2,075 0.72 8.38 0.383 $862 $4,133 warehousing 150 0.235 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 5650 A I General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 8.38 0.383 :::2 $2,061 MedicallDental Office Bldg 720 1.860 1,00 8.38 0.383 2 $5,146 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0.750 1100 8.38 0.383 $862 52,075 Per Indicated Unit Gas Station with 7o-nv-Mkt -(fueling positior 945 6.690 0.44 -2.10 0.383 $862 $2.041 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 &58 2.10 0 383 $862 $2,787 GcIf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1,00 8.38 0, 383 $862 $3,790 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seal) 444 0.035 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $97 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0,072 1.00 4,19 0.383 $862 $100 3 0 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2,595 0.58 2.10 0�383 $862 $1,043 Self -Service Car Wash (Stall) 947 1 2.770 0.58 2.10 0.383 $862 $1,114 Ordinance #200 Page A-2 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 3 - SOUTHEAST ... .. ... . 2 Service Area 6,34 0.357 Nei 50% Neighborhood Land Uses 25% ITE TRIP RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ITE - 7th Edition Land UseCode ITE (One -Way) PM Peak Hour New Trip x (Pass -By Only) x x Network, XE [Zt*1ftjVI1t Single Family Apartment Residential Condo/Townhouse Mobile Home (rounded) 210 0.505 1.00 6,34 0.357 $690 $789 '9 220 0310 1.00 6,34 0.357 $690 $484 230 0,260 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $406 'S 240 0.295 1.00 6,34 0.357 $690 $466 1 Hotel Motel Pee Room 310 0.295 1.0-0 6.34 0.3 $690 $461 320 02375 L1.00 624 0.357 1 5690 5367 Automobile Caro Center 942 1.690 0,72 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,900 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2,990 0.57 3.17 0,357 $690 $1,331 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 0.53 1.59 0.357 $690 $4,747 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2.245 0.74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,595 Business Park 770 0.645 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,007 Church 560 0.330 1.00 3.17 0,357 $690 $258 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 0.39 1.59 0.357 $690 $4,03 Discount Club 861 2.120 0.77 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,549 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2,530 0.83 6.34 0.357 $690 $3,279 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 1.935 0,72 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,176 Furniture Store 890 0.230 0,47 6.34 0,357 $690 $169 Garden Center/ Nursery 817 1,900 0,74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,196 Hardware/Paint Store 816 2.420 034 634 0.357 $690 $2,797 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,225 0.52 6,34 0.357 $690 $995 Hospital 610 0.590 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $921 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 6,34 0.357 $690 $672 Light Industrial 110 0.490 1.00 6.34 0,357 $690 $765 Manufacturing 140 0.370 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $578 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $203 New Car Sales 841 1.320 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,484 PharmacylDrug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4.210 0,47 1.59 0.357 $690 $775 PharmacylDrug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 0.51 1.59 0,357 $690 $861 Restaurant - Fast Food wl drive-thru windc 934 17,320 0.50 1.59 0.357 $690 $3,392 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 5,460 0.57 3.17 0.357 $600 $2,430 Restaurant . Quality 931 3.745 0.56 3,17 0.357 $690 $1,638 Shopping Center 820 1.875 0.66 6,34 0.357 $690 $1.933 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 0.66 6,34 0.357 $690 $1,397 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 5.225 0.64 1.59 0.357 $690 $1,310 Tim Store 848 2.075 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,333 WarehougM150 0.235 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 S367 •0 :4jL*3;j?jIWk - - MUNIFITITIM-CEIIIIII General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 6.34 0.357$690 $1 ,163 Medical/Dental Office Bldg 1.860 1.00 6.34 0.357 ::go 52,905 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0.750 1,00 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,171 Per Indicated Unit Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling posilior 945 630-0 0.44 1.50 0.357 $690 $1,153 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 0,58 1.59 0.357 $690 $1,574 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1100 6.34 0.357 $1390 $2,140 Movie Theater wl matinee (seat) 444 0,035 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $55 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0,072 1.00 3.17 0.367 $690 $56 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2.695 0.58 1.59 0.357 $690 $589 Self -Service Car Wash (Stall) 947 2.770 1 0.58 1.59 0.357 $690 $629 Ordinance #200 Page A-3 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 4 - NORTHEAST M Service Area 6.12 0.402 Neighborhood Land Uses 50% 25% J ITE - 7th Edition ITE Land Use Code ITE TRIP PATES (One -Way) PM Peak Hour x ADJUSTMENT FACTORS New Trip (Pass -By x al. Only) Single Family 210 Apartment 220 Residential CondoiTownhouse 230 Mobile Home 240 (rounded) 0.505 0.310 0.260 0.295 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6,12 0.402 $954 $1,185 $954 $728 $954 $610 $954 $692 Hotel 310 Motel 320 Per Room ......... 0.295 1 1.00 6.12 0A02 $954 $692 0,235 _j 1.00 6.12 0.402 $9;�4 $552 111 Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 0.72 6,12 0.402 $954 $2,856 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2.990 0.57 3.06 0,402 5954 $2,000 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 0.53 1.53 0.402 $954 $7,112 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2,245 014 6,12 0.402 $954 $3,899 Business Park 770 0.645 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,514 Church 560 0.330 1.00 3.06 0,402 5954 $387 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 0.39 1,53 OA02 $954 $5,997 Discount Club 861 2,120 0.77 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,831 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 0.83 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,929 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 1.935 0.72 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,270 Furniture Store 890 0.230 0.47 6.12 0.402 $954 $254 Carden Center) Nursery 817 1.900 0.74 6.12 0.402 5954 $3,300 Hardware/ftnt Store 816 2.420 0.74 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,203 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,225 0.52 6J2 0.402 $954 $1,495 Hospital 610 0.590 1.00 6.12 0.402 $9.54 $1,385 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 6.12 0,402 $954 $1,009 Light Industrial 110 0.490 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,150 Manufacturing 140 0,370 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $868 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $305 New Car Sales 841 1.320 0.72 6.12 0.402 5954 $2,231 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4.210 0,47 1.53 0.402 $954 $1,161 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4,310 0.51 1.53 0,402 $954 $1,290 Restaurant - Fast Food w/ drive-thru windo 934 17.320 0.50 1,53 0.402 $954 $5,081 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 5.460 0.57 3.06 0.402 $954 $3,652 Restaurant - Quality 931 3.745 0.66 3.06 OA02 $954 $2,461 Shopping Center 820 1.875 0.66 6.12 0,402 $954 $2,904 Specialty Retail 814 1,355 0.66 6.12 0.402 $954 $2,099 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 5,225 0.64 1.53 0.402 $954 $1,962 Tire Store 848 2.075 0.72 6.12 0,402 $954 $3,507 Warehousing 150 1 0.235 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $552 OFFICE DEVELOPMENTS Per 1.000 General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1. 6,12 0.402 $954 $1,749 Medical/Dental Office Bldg 720 1.3q60 0 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,366 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 750 1.00 6.12 0.402 5954 S1.760 Per Indicated Unit Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling positior 945 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 Public Park - City (acre) 411 Quick Lubrication (servicing posons) 941 Self -Service Car Wash (StAl) 947 . . ....... .. Ordinance #200 Page A-4 ate. N.iLy L vulwll lvicculig ra�c F vl Will Berg From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:52 PM To: bergwc@ci.meridian.id.us Cc: 'Tammy de Weerd;'Anna Canning;'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Will, Here is another potential agenda item for the joint meeting, per my discussion with Mayor De Weerd yesterday. Impact Fee Area Boundary: We want to open the dialogue about shifting the impact fee area boundary. Currently the impact fee area boundary is drawn at Eagle Road. Properties on the east side of Eagle Road are in the same area as Garden City and Downtown Boise. Therefore, impact fees from projects like Crossroads Shopping Center, Redfeather Estates, etc. cannot be used for road needs in North Meridian. ACHD will be reevaluating the impact fee service area boundaries next year as part of their new 20 -year CIP. However, we need to start the discussion now so that ACHD is clearly aware of the City's desires. Steve sw-,7 simdowhy ffa,'fdaa'a&Uzzky- cot Zazhw- 660 0 W Cp er 4aao, Srz,,cq 0� Oo&4&, 1,14& &,O -OZ avve, z0eee-5( 5,,5vA3 208. AeY 6�, 5� -----Original Message ----- From: Steve Siddoway[mailto:siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: 'Tammy de Weerd' Cc: 'bergw@ci.meridian.id.us'; 'Anna Canning'; 'Shaun Wardle' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Here are a couple of thoughts: 1. Detached Sidewalks: The City's Comprehensive Plan requires detached sidewalks along arterial roads per Figure VI -4 on page 56. We are getting the detached sidewalks where they are constructed by new development. However, whenever ACHD builds a road widening project, they always put in (primarily) attached sidewalks. I say 'primarily', because along Overland, a couple of sections are detached where sidewalks were already detached prior to the project, but most areas are attached. I have attended several ACHD open houses to provide comments on the sidewalks (Eagle Rd., Franklin, Ten Mile) but am always met with the same issue—'we cannot detach the sidewalks because there is no one to maintain the parkway between the curb and sidewalk ---but we'll look into it and get back to you.' I just saw plans on Friday of the Overland/Meridian project (98% complete) and again they show attached sidewalks along SH -69 (Meridian Road). This is very frustrating to me. I would like to see if we can work out a policy for ACHD to start building detached sidewalks along arterial roads whenever they do a road widening project. We have several coming up—Locust Grove, Overland extension, Eagle Road extension, Ten Mile, Linder, Franklin, etc. and it will be a real shame in my opinion if we lose this opportunity to detach the sidewalks. 3/30/2005 ccs: Urry Uouncrr ivleeung rage L or i Downtown Meridian: I have an internal debate going on about whether this is the right time to debate funding for the Split Corridor head on. My gut feeling is that it is not the right time. l believe the best way to broach the subject is to hold off the formal on -record discussion until the plan is formally accepted/adopted by both agencies. Our position is strengthened if ACHD has adopted the plan. At this meeting, we should discuss the current status of the plan, with the. final draft being reviewed by ACHD and Ci staff and discuss the process to have the plan adopted by both entities. For our part, I will schedule the plan for public hearings as an addendum to Comprehensive Plan once it is deemed complete by both agencies' staff. It may also be appropriate to direct ACHD and City staff to prepare a presentation on the timing and funding options for the project for the following joint meeting. This will take some time to coordinate with ACHD staff, but I believe we can show that it is appropriate to move the design of "phase one" (Waltman to Franklin) into the FY06 ACHD budget. However, we need a final plan before seriously engaging such discussions; and as soon as I get comments from ACRD staff I will coordinate final edits with Tom and get the final product. I feel that we have nothing to gain and everything to lose right now if we get at loggerheads with the ACHD Commission. We have come so far in building consensus on a preferred alternative that works for both agencies. I think we need to carefully massage the funding issue behind the scenes for now. You might also mention that I am pleased to have been invited to help present the Downtown Meridian project with Terry Little at the upcoming Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) conference. Feel free to call if you want to discuss these issues in further detail. Steve Pxiu�r�aal Pl�ua�x �I��xda�zz, Id�1,o 8�6�z F& zo9&8,yees4 -----Original Message ----- From: Tammy de Weerd[mailto;deweerdt@meridiancity.org] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:47 AM To: Will Berg; Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail) Cc: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E- mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail); siddowas@meridiancity.org Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thanks for the reminder, Will. If anyone has items for the joint meeting with ACHD please let Will and I know. Thanks. Tammy de Weerd, Mayor City of Meridian www.meridiancitv.ora (208) 888-1,1 33 ext. 201 (208) 888-1218 fax 3/30/2005 Ism. �_ILy %.UUJIcii ldiccLIXIg 3/30/2005 raga .3 vi J From: Will Berg Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:51 AM To: Christine Donnell (E-mail); Charlie Rountree (E-mail); Keith Bird (E-mail); Shaun Wardle (E-mail); Tammy de Weerd Ce: Doug Strong (E-mail); Anna Canning (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann; Bill Nary; Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Brad Watson (E -mai]) Subject: City Council Meeting Reminder: no City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2005 the next City Council Meeting will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005 joint meeting with Ada County Highway District Commissioners will be Monday, April 4th, 2005 at noon at ACHD Ada County Highway District Exhibit A Traffic Impact Fee Schedule By the Board of Highway District Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho: Huber, Eastlake, Bivens, Franden and Wynkoop RECEIVED APR - 4 2005 Cityof Meridian CityClerk Office EXHIBITS A. EXHIBIT "A" Traffic Impact Fee Schedule B. EXHIBIT "B" ACRD Traffic Impact Fee Methodology C. EXHIBIT "C" ACRD Capital Improvements Plan Ordinance No. 200 �F m EXHIBIT A ACHD Traffic Impact Fee Schedules Ordinance No. 200 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area;I - NORTHWEST Q ' Sennas Area° . gverage VMT CpsE Ad'ddtmenE Fac{ors Tnp Len ih...:Nehvork A:4 Service Area 7.50 0.384 i s 50% Neighborhood Neighborhood Land Uses 25% ,ITE -7th Edition Land Use Code ITE TRIP -RATES (One -Way) t�uiiue�t $1,517 Residential Condo/Townhouse 230 Mobile 0.260 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 Single Family 210 Apartment 220 0.505 1.00 7.50 0.384$1,043 0.310 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 t�uiiue�t $1,517 Residential Condo/Townhouse 230 Mobile 0.260 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 5931 $781 Home 240 0.295 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $886 Hotel 310 0.295 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $886 Motel 320 0.235 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $706 res Automobile Care Center 942 Automobile Parts Sales 643 1.690 2.990 0.72 7.50 0.384 0.57 3.75 0,384 $1,043 $1,043 $3,655 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 Building 22.870 0.53 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $2,560 $9,127 Materials and Lumber 812 Business Park 2.245 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $4,990 770 Church 560 0.645 0.330 1.00 7.50 0.384 1.00 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,937 $496 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 Discount Club 26.205 0.39 1-88 0.384 $1,043 $7,695 861 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2,120 0.77 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $4,903 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 Furniture Store 2.530 1.935 0.83 7.50 0.384 0.72 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $6,308 $4,185 890 Garden Center/ Nursery 0.230 0,47 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $325 817 Hardware/PaintStore 1.900 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $4,223 816 Home Improvement Superstore 862 2,420 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $5,379 Hospital 610 Industrial 1.225 0.590 0.52 7.50 0.364 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,913 $1,772 Park 130 Light Industrial 0.430 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,292 110 Manufacturing 140 0.490 0.370 1.00 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,472 $1,111 Mini -Warehouse 151 New Car Sales 0.130 1.00 7.50 0,384 $1,043 $390 841 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 1.320 4.210 0.72 7.50 0.384 0.47 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $2,855 $1,490 PharmacylDrug stare (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 0.51 1.88 0-384 $1,043 $1,655 Restaurant - Fast Food wl drive-thru windo 934 Restaurant - High Turnover 17.320 0.50 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $6,521 932 Restaurant - Quality 5.460 0.57 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $4,674 931 Shopping Center 3.745 0.56 3.75 0,384 $1,043 $3,150 820 Specialty Retail 814 1.875 1.355 0.66 7.50 0.384 0.66 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $3,717 $2,686 Supermarket (Free! Standing) 850 Tire Store 848 5.225 2.075 0.64 1.88 0.384 0.72 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $2,518 $4,488 Warehousing 150 0.235 1.00 7.50 0.384 1 1 $1,043 $706 General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,443 $2,238 Medical/Dental Office Bldg 720 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 1.860 1,00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 0.750 1-00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $5,587 $2,253 Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling positier 945 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.690 0.44 1.88 0.384 $1,043 6.930 0.58 1.86 0.384 $1,043 $2,216 $3,026 Golf Course (Hole) 430 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 1.370 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 0.035 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $4,115 $105 Public Park - City (acre) 411 Quick Lubrication 0.072 1.00 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $108 (servicing positions) 941 Self -Service Car Wash (Stall) 947 2.595 0.58 1.88 0.384 $1,043 2.770 0.58 1.88 0.384 1 1 $1,043 $1,133 $1,210 Ordinance #200 Page A-1 Automobile Care Center 442 Automobile Parts Sales 843 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 Building Materials Lumber 1.690 2.990 22.870 0.72 8.38 0.383 0.57 4.19 0.383 0.53 2,10 0.383 $862 $3,366 $862 $2,358 $862 $8,404 and 812 Business Park 2.245 0,74 8.38 0,383 $862 $4,596 770 Church 560 0.645 0.330 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 4.19 0,3133 $862 $1,784 $862 $456 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 Discount Club 861 26.205 2.120 0.39 2.10 0.383 0.77 8.38 0.383 $862 $7,086 $862 $4,516 Free-standing Discount Store 815 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 Furniture Store 890 2.530 1.935 0.230 0.83 8.38 0.383 0,72 8.38 0.383 0.47 8.38 0.383 $862 $5,810 $862 $3,854 $862 Garden Center! Nursery 817 HardwarelPaint Store 816 Home Improvement 1.900 2,420 0.74 8.38 0,383 014 8.38 0.383 $299 $862 $3,890 $862 $4,954 Superstore 862 Hospital 610 Industrial Park 1.225 0.590 0.52 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,762 $862 $1,632 130 Light JndusIrial 110 0.430 0.490 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,190 $862 $1,356 Manufacturing 140 Mini -Warehouse 151 New Car Sales 841 0.370 0,130 1,320 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $852 $1,024 $862 $360 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.210 4.310 0.72 8.38 0,383 0.47 2.10 0.383 0.51 2.10 0.383 $862 $2,629 $862 $1,372 $862 $1,524 Restaurant - Fast Food wl drive-thru windc 934 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 Restaurant - Quality 931 17.320 6.460 3.745 0.50 2.10 0.383 0.57 4.19 0.383 0.56 $862 $6,004 $862 $4,305 Shopping Center 820 Specialty Retail 814 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 Tire Store 1.875 1.355 5.225 4.19 0.383 0,66 8.38 0.383 0.66 8,38 0.383 0.64 2.10 0.383 $862 $2,901 $862 $3,424 $862 $2,474 $862 $2,318 848 L Warehousing 150 1 2.075 0.235 0.72 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $4,133 $862 $650 M20141101LATIMI• MR4141MM General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 8,38 0,38 862 $2,061 Medical/Dental Office Bldg 720 1.860 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $5,146 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0.750 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $2,075 �Mrr'a• Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling positior 945 6.690 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 0.44 2,10 0.383 $862 $2,041 0.58 2,10 0.3133 $862 $2,787 1 Movie Theater wl matinee (sea[) 444 0.035 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0,072 1.00 8,38 0,383 $862 $3,790 1.00 8,38 0,383 $862 $97 1.00 4.19 0.383 $862 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2.595 $100 0.58 2.10 0.383 $862 $1:143 Self -Service Car Wash Stall 947 I- 0.58 2.10 0.383 1 1 $362 $1 114 Ordinance #200 Page A-2 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 3 - SOUTHEAST A q ff '2" eivice rea ....... .. .. 'A ky'k,age Lend l N e 20 )n ark. . ........ .. . . . Service Area 6.34 0,357 Neighborhood Land Uses 50% 25% LTE TRIP RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ITE - 7th Edition (One-way) New Trip - $690 $1,331 $690 $4,747 Building Materials and Lumber 812 Business Park ITE Land Use ode C PM Peak H x N (Pass -By x I �S AMR Only) (rounded) $690 $2,595 Single Family 210 Apartment 220 Residential Condorrownhouse 230 Mobile Home 240 0.505 0.310 0.260 0.296 1.00 6.34 0.357 1.00 6.34 0.357 1.00 6.34 0.367 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $789 $690 $484 $690 $406 $690 $461 Hotel 310 Motel 320 0.295 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $461 0.235 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 _$367 Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,900 Automobile Parts Sales 843 Bank, Dril 912 2.990 22.870 0.57 3.17 0.357 0.53 1.59 0.357 $690 $1,331 $690 $4,747 Building Materials and Lumber 812 Business Park 2.246 0.74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,595 770 Church 560 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 0.645 0.330 26.205 1.00 6.34 0.357 1,00 3.17 0.357 0.39 1.59 0.357 $690 $1,007 $690 $258 $690 54,03 Discount Club 861 Free-standing Discount Store 815 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 Furniture Store 890 Garden Center/ Nursery 817 2.120 2.530 1.935 0.230 1.900 0,77 6.34 0.357 0-83 6.34 0.357 0.72 6.34 0.357 0.47 6.214 0.357 0.74 6,34 0,357 $690 52,549 $690 $3,279 $690 $2,176 $690 $169 Hardware/Paint Store 816 Home Improvement Superstore 862 Hospital 610 Industrial Park 130 Light 2.420 1.225 0,590 0.430 0.74 6.34 0.357 0.52 6.34 0.357 1.00 6.34 0,357 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,196 $690 $2,797 $690 $995 $690 $921 $690 $672 Industrial 110 Manufacturing 140 Mini -Warehouse 151 0,490 0.370 0,130 1.00 6.34 0.357 1.00 6.34 0,357 1.00 $690 $765 $690 $578 New Car Sales 841 PharmacyiDrug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 1.320 4.210 6.34 0.357 0.72 6.34 0.357 0.47 1.59 0.357 $690 $203 $690 $1,484 $690 $775 PhamnacylDrug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 Restaurant Past Food 4.310 0.51 1.59 0.357 $690 $861 - w/ drive-thru windc 934 Restaurant - High Turnover 17.320 0.50 1.59 0.357 $690 $3,392 932 Restaurant - Quality 931 Shopping Center 820 Specialty Retail 814 6,460 3.745 1.875 0.57 3.17 0.357 0.56 117 0.357 0166 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,430 $690 $1,638 $690 $1,933 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 Tire Store 848 Warehousing 150 1.355 5.225 2.075 0.235 066 6.34 0.357 0.64 1.59 0.357 0.72 6.34 0.357 1.00 6,34 0.357 1 $690 $1,397 $690 $1,310 $690 $2,333 1 $690 $367 General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 6,34 0.357 $690 51,163 Meftal/Dental Office Bldg 720 1.860 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,905 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0,750 1.00 6.34 0.367 $690 $1,171 Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling positior 945 6.690 0.44 1.59 0,357 $690 $1,153 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 0.58 1159 0.357 $690 51,574 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,140 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 0.035 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $55 Public Park City . (acre) 411 0.072 1.00 3.17 0.357 $690 $56 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2.595 0,58 1.59 0.357 $690 $589 Self -Service Car Wash (Stall) 947 2.770 j 0,58 1.59 0.357 $690 5629 Ordinance #200 Page A-3 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area:4 -NORTHEAST AverageVMT Cast Act u5tmenfl actara ..> Trip N6tw rk Service Area T17-, 6,12 0,402 50% 4 Neighborhood Land Uses 25% ITE tkip RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS_ ITE - 7th Edition fone-way) ITE Land Use Code PM Peak Hour x Network x (rounded) Single Family 210 Apartment 220 Residential Condo/Townhouse 230 Mobile Home 240 0.505 0.310 0.260 0.295 1.00 6,12 0,402 1100 6,12 0,402 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0,402 $954 $1,185 $954 $728 $954 $610 $954 $692 Hotel 310 Motel 320 0.295 1 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $642 0.235 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $552 1110MINERNMEM lig 114 Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 0,72 6.12 0.4 $954 $2,1156 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2.990 0,57 3.06 0.402 $954 $2,000 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 0.53 1.53 0.402 $954 $7,112 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2.245 0.74 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,899 Business Park 770 0.645 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,514 Church 560 0.330 1100 3.06 0.402 $954 $387 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 0.39 1.53 0.402 $954 $5,997 Discount Club 861 2.120 0.77 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,831 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 0.83 6.12 OA02 $954 $4,929 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 1.935 0,72 6,12 0,402 $954 $3,270 Furniture Store 890 0.230 0,47 6.12 0,402 $954 $254 Garden Center I Nursery 817 1,900 0,74 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,300 HardwarefPaint Store 816 2.420 0.74 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,203 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1.225 0.52 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,495 Hospital 610 0,590 1.00 6,12 0,402 $954 $1,385 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 6.12 0.402 $9.54 $1,009 Light Industrial 110 0,490_ 00 6.12 0,402 $954 $1,150 Manufacturing 140 0.370 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $868 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $305 New Car Sales 841 1.320 0.72 6.12 0,402 $954 $2,231 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4,210 0.47 1.53 0.402 $954 $1,161 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 8131 4.310 0.51 1153 0.402 $954 $1,290 Restaurant - Fast Food w/ drive-thru windc 934 17.320 0.50 1.63 0.402 $954 $5,081 Restaurant . High Turnover 932 5.460 0.57 3.06 0.402 $954 $3,652 Restaurant - Quality 931 3,745 0.56 3.05 0,402 $954 $2,461 Shopping Center 820 1.875 0.66 6112 0,402 $954 $2,904 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 0.66 6.12 0.402 $954 $2,099 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 5.225 0.64 1.53 0.402 $954 $1,962 Tire Store 848 2.075 0-72 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,507 L Warehousing 150 1 0.235 1 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $552 . wim,171un - - - General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1.00 6.1 '2 0.402 $1,749 Madical/Denial Office Bldg 720 1.860 6,12 0,402 954 7 77 20 $ 0 $954 $4,366 Office Park Man Buildings) 750 0.750 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,760 Gas Station with onv VIM (fueling positior E145 6.690 0.44 1.53 0,402 $954 $1,727 Gas Stal€on (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 0.55 1153 0.402 $954 $2,358 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1100 6.12 0.402 $954 $3,215 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 0.035 1.00 6.12 OA02 $954 $82 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0.072 1.00 3.06 0.402 $954 $84 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) e41 2.595 0.58 1.53 0.402 $954 $583 Self -Service Car Wash (Stali) 947 2.770 0.58 1.53 0.402 $954 $943 Ordinance #200 Page A-4 Ada County Highway District Exhibit A Trafric Impact Fee Schedule By the Board of Highway District Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho: Huber, Eastlake, Bivens, Franden and Wynkoop RECEIVED APR - 4 2005 Cityof Meridian City Clerk Office EXHIBITS A. EXHIBIT "A" Traffic Impact Fee Schedule B. EXHIBIT "B" ACHD Traffic Impact Fee Methodology C. EXHIBIT "C" ACHD Capital Improvements Plan Ordinance Na. 200 EXHIBIT A ACHD Traffic Impact Fee Schedules Ordinance No. 200 EXHIBIT A Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 7 - NORTHWEST I # �° Service Area` Average Vk9T Cost pd ustenent Factors Trip Len th -Network Service Area 7.50 0.384 Neighborhood Land Uses 50% 25% ITE - 7th Edition(One-Way) Use Code FTE TRIP RATES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS New Trip MITE (Pass•By xx Network Only) x =Land PM Peak Hour x Single Family 210 0.505 Apartment 220 0.310 043 1.00 7.50 0.384043 1.00 7.50 0.384T$1,043 $1,517 Residential CondolTownhouse 230 0.260 Mobile Home 240 0.295 1.00 7.50 0.384043 1.00 7.50 0.384 $931 $781 $886 Hotel 310 0,295 Motel 320 0.235 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $886 $706 Automobi#e Care Center 0.72 7.50 0,384 0.57 3.75 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $3,655 $2,560 942 1.690 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2.990 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2,245 0.53 1.88 0.384 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $9,127 $4,990 Business Park 770 0.645 Church 560 0.330 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,937 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 Discount Club 861 2.120 1.00 3.75 0.384 0.39 1.88 0.384 0.77 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,043 $496 $7,695 $4,903 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 Free-standing Discount Superstars 813 1.935 Furniture Store 890 0,230 0.83 7.50 0.384 0.72 7,50 0.384 0.47 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,043 $6,308 $4,185 Garden Center! Nursery 817 1.900 HardwarelPainl 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $325 $4,223 Store 616 2.420 Home Improvement Superstore 0.74 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $5,379 862 1.225 Hospital 610 0.590 Industrial 0.52 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 51,043 $1,043 $1,913 $1,772 Park 130 0.430 Light Industrial 110 0,490 1.00 7.50 0.384 1.00 7.50 $1,043 $1,292 Manufacturing 140 0.370 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 0.384 1.00 7.50 0.384 1.00 $1,043 $1,043 $1,472 $1,111 New Car Sales 841 1.320 7.50 0.384 0.72 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $390 $2,855 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4,210 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 Restaurant 0.47 1.88 0.384 0.51 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $1,490 $1,655 - Fast Food wl drive-thru windo 934 17.320 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 5.460 0.50 1.88 0.384 0.57 3.75 $1,043 $6,521 Restaurant - Quality 931 3.745 Shopping Center 820 1,875 0.384 0.56 3.75 0.384 0.66 $1,043 $1,043 $4,674 $3,150 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 7.50 0.384 0.66 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $1,043 $3,717 $2,686 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 5,225 0.64 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $2,518 Tire Stare 848 2.075 Warehousino 150 0.235 0.72 7.50 0.384 1.00 7,50 0.384 1 $1,043 1 $1,043 $4,488 $706 • . •• iii General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 Medicai/Dental Office Bldg 720 1.860 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 1.00 $2,238 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0.750 7.50 0.384 $1,043 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 $5,587 $2,253 Gas Station with Ccnv Mkt (fueling position 945 ,6.690 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 Golf Course 0.44 1.88 0.384 $1,043 0.58 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $2,216 $3,026 (Hole) 430 1.370 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 0.035 Public Park- City (acre) 411 0.072 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 1.00 7.50 0.384 $1,043 1.00 $4,115 $105 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2.595 Self -Service Car Wash Stall 947 2.770 3.75 0.384 $1,043 0.58 1.88 0.384 $1,043 0.56 1.88 0.384 $1,043 $108 $1,133 $1,210 Ordinance #200 Page A -'i Automobile Care Center 942 Automobile Parts Sales 1.690 0.72 8.38 0.383 $862 $3,366 843 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 2.990 0.57 4,19 0,383 $882 $2,358 Building Materials and Lumber 812 Business Park 770 Church 560 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 Discount Club 861 22.870 2.245 0.645 0.330 26,205 2.120 0.53 2.10 0.383 0.74 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 4.19 0.383 0.39 2.10 0.383 0.77 8.38 0.383 $862 $8,404 $862 $4,596 $862 $1,784 $862 $456 $862 $7,086 $862 $4,516 Free-standing Discount Store 815 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 Furniture Store 890 Garden Center/ Nursery 817 Hardware/Paint Store - 816 Home Improvement Superstore 862 Hospital 610 Industrial Park 130 2.530 1.935 0.230 1.900 2.420 1.225 0.590 0.430 0.83 8.38 0.383 0.72 8.38 0.383 0.47 8.38 0.383 0.74 8.38 0.383 0.74 8.38 0.383 0.52 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $5,810 $862 $3,854 $862 $299 $862 $3,890 $862 $4,954 $862 $1,762 $862 $1,632 Light Industrial 110 Manufacturing 140 Mini -Warehouse 151 New Car Sales 0.490 0.370 0.130 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 1.00 6.38 0.383 1.00 8.38 0.383 $862 $1,190 $862 $1,356 $862 $1,024 $862 $360 841 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 1.320 4.210 0.72 8.38 0.383 0.47 2.10 0.383 $862 $2,629 $862 PharmacylDrug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 0,51 2.10 0.383 $1,372 $862 $1,524 Restaurant - Fast Food wl drive-thru windc 934 Restaurant - High Turnover 932 17.320 5.460 0.50 2.10 0.383 0.57 4.19 0.383 $862 $6,004 $862 $4,305 Restaurant - Quality 931 Shopping Center 820 Specially Retail 814 Supermarket (Free Standing) 3.745 1.875 1.355 0.56 4.19 0.383 0.66 8.38 0.383 0.66 8.38 0.383 $862 $2,901 $862 $3,424 $862 $2,474 850 Tire Store 848 5.225 2.075 0.64 2.10 0,383 0.72 8.38 0.383 $862 $2,318 $862 $4,133 __Warehouslng 150 0.235 1.00 8.38 0.383 1 $862 $650 UYh.t[:_E-,UEVELOeMENTS ;�;' , ;; Pef:1 000 Sq Ftt Gas Station with Ccnv Mkt (fueling positior 945 6.690 0,44 2,10 0,383 $862 $2,041 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) �. •1 1 i 11 G• f:: 1 P'er• Iniltcated:;Llnit 1 1 1 0.383 Golf Course (Hole) •,1 1.370 1.00 8.38 0.383 •1 Movie Theater w/ matinee (seat) 444 0.035 F1 8.38 0.383 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0.072 11 419 / 11 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions)2.595 0.58 Z10 0.3831 43 L -S -21 -f -service Car Wash (Stall) 947 1 1 1 1 Ordinance #200 - A . ....... .. Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,900 Automobile Paris Sales 843 2,990 0.57 3.17 0.357 $690 $1,331 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 0.53 1.59 0.357 $690 $4,747 Building Materials and Lumber 812 2.245 0,74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,595 Business Park 770 0.645 i 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,007 Church 560 0,330 1 1.00 3.17 0.357 $690 $258 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 0.39 1.59 0.357 $690 $4,003 Discount Club 861 2,120 0.77 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,549 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 0.83 6.34 0.367 $690 $3,279 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 1.935 0.72 6,34 0.357 $690 $2,176 Furniture Store 890 0.230 0.47 6,34 0.357 $690 $169 Garden Center / Nursery 817 1.900 0.74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,196 Hardware/Paint Store 816 2.420 0.74 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,797 Home Improvement Superslore 862 1.225 0.52 6.34 0.357 $690 $995 Hospital 610 0.590 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $921 Industrial Park 130 0.430 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $672 Light Industrial 110 0.490 1,00 6.34 0.357 $690 $765 Manufacturing 140 0.370 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $578 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $203 New Car Sales 841 1.320 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,484 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 880 4.210 0.47 1.59 0.357 $690 $775 PharmaPylDrug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4.310 0.51 1.59 0.357 $690 $861 Restaurant - Fast Food w/ drive-thru winds 934 17.320 0.50 1.59 0.357 $690 $3.392 Restaurant - High Tumovet 932 5.460 0.57 3,17 0,357 $690 $2,430 Restaurant - Quality 931 3,745 0.56 117 0.357 $690 $1,638 Shopping Center 820 1.875 0.66 6.34 0,357 $690 $1,933 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 0.66 6,34 0,357 $690 $1.397 Supermarket (Free Standing) 850 5.225 0.64 1.59 0.357 $690 $1,310 Tire Store 848 2,075 0.72 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,333 L -Warehousing 150 0.235 1.00 6.34 0.35.7 $ligo $367 General Office (Many Users) 710 O.745 1.00 6.54 0.357 $690 $1 63 Medical/Dental Medical/Dental Office Bldg 720 1.860 1.00 6.34 0,357 905 Office P $690 $2:' Moe Park(Many Buildings) 750 0.750 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $1,171 • Gas Station with Coriv Mkt (fueling positior 945 6.690 0.44 1.59 0,357 $690 $1,153 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 0.68 1.69 0.357 $690 $11,574 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $2,140 Movie Theater wl matinee (seat) 444 0.035 1.00 6.34 0.357 $690 $55 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0.072 1.00 3.17 0,357 $690 $56 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2.595 0.58 1,59 0.357 $690 $599 Self -Service Car Wash _(Stall) 947 2,770 1 0.58 1.59 0.357 $690 $629 Ordinance #200 Page A-3 EXHIBIT A - Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Service Area: 4 - NORTHEAST 1,71 T'j-1 K SArea uvrce yerage ., Ad Justment Favt6rz A' rip Length NAYor Service Area 612 0.402 j VA9T Cost '=n=' Neighborhood Land Uses 501 25% Hotel 310 1.CG 6.12 0.402 1: Motel 0 1 .00 6.12 0 7th Edition JTE TRIP PATE (One -Way) $1,185 Residential CordairrownhousL 230 0.260 Mobile Home 240 0,295 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0,402 I TF PM Peak Hour x Hotel 310 1.CG 6.12 0.402 1: Motel 0 1 .00 6.12 0 Cz Land Use Code $954 $1,514 0.330 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 Discount Club 861 2.120 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 1.00 3.06 0.402 0.39 1.53 0.402 0.77 6.12 0.402 0.83 Single Family 210 0,505 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 Apartment 220 0.310 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,185 Residential CordairrownhousL 230 0.260 Mobile Home 240 0,295 1.00 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0,402 $954 $954 $728 $610 $692 Hotel 310 1.CG 6.12 0.402 1: Motel 0 1 .00 6.12 0 0.645 Church 560 ENE=111 Automobile Care Center 942 1.690 Automobile Pans Sales 843 2.990 Bank, Drive-Thru 912 22.870 Building Materials and Lumber 0.72 6,12 0.402 0.57 3.06 0.402 0.53 1.53 0.402 $954 $2,856 $954 $2,000 $954 $7,112 812 2.245 Business Park 770 0.74 6,12 0,402 $954 $3,899 0.645 Church 560 1.00 6,12 0,402 $954 $1,514 0.330 Convenience Market (24hrs) 851 26.205 Discount Club 861 2.120 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.530 1.00 3.06 0.402 0.39 1.53 0.402 0.77 6.12 0.402 0.83 $9511 $337 $964 $5,997 $954 $3,831 Free-standing Discount Superstore B13 1.935 Furniture Store 890 0.230 Garden Center/ Nursery 817 1.900 Hardware/Paint Store 816 2.420 6.12 0.402 0.72 6.12 0.402 0.47 6.12 0.402 0-74 6.12 0.402 0,74 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,929 $954 $3,270 $954 $254 $954 $3,300 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1.225 Hospital 610 0,590 Industrial Park 0.52 6.12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,203 $954 $1,495 $9.54 $1,385 130 0.430 Light Industrial 110 0.490 Manufacturing 140 0,370 Mini -Warehouse 151 0.130 New Car Safes 841 1.00 6,12 0.402 1.00 6.12 0,402 1.00 6.12 0.402 1100 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,09 $954 $1,150 $954 $868 $954 $305 1.320 Pharmacy/Drug store (No Drive-Thru) 860 4.210 Pharmacy/Drug store (With Drive-Thru) 881 4,310 Restaurant - Fast Food wl drive-thru winda 934 17,320 Restaurant - High Turnover 0.72 6.12 0.402 0.47 1.53 0,402 0.51 1.53 0.402 0.50 1.53 0.402 $954 $2,231 $954 $1,161 $954 $1,290 $954 $5,081 932 5.460 Restaurant - Quality 931 3.745 0,57 3.06 0.402 0J56 3.06 0,402 $954 $3,652 $954 $2,461 Shopping Center 820 1.875 Specialty Retail 814 1.355 Supermarket Standing) 0.66 6.12 0.402 0.66 6112 O402 $954 $2,904 $954 $2,099 (Free 850 5.225 Tire Store 848 2.075 1 Warehousing 150 0,235 0.64 1,53 0,402 012 6,12 0.402 1,00 6.12 0,402 $954 $1,962 $954 $3,507 $954 $552 •231101MIMI 11100NIM111 General Office (Many Users) 710 0.745 1 1.00 6,12 0.402 $954-$1,749 Medical/Denial Office Bldg 720 1,860 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $4,366 Office Park (Many Buildings) 750 0,750 1.00 6.12 0.402 $954 $1,760 Gas Station with Conv Mkt (fueling posiiUjcr 945 6.690 0.44 1.E-0.402 $954 $1,727 Gas Station (vehicle fueling position) 944 6.930 0.58 1.53 0.402 $954 $2,358 Golf Course (Hole) 430 1.370 1.00 612 0.402 S954 $3,215 Movie Theater W/ matinee (seat) 444 0.035 1.00 6,12 0.402 $954 $82 Public Park - City (acre) 411 0.072 1.00 106 0.402 $954 $84 Quick Lubrication (servicing positions) 941 2,596 0.58 1.53 0.402 $954 $883 Self -Service Car Wash (Stall 947 2,770 0.58 1.53 0.402 $954 $943 Ordinance #200 Page A-4 Legend and McMilli Signalize intersection. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $334,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $334,000 IN205-01 SH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Columbia Signalize intersection. lTD is lead agency. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $120,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $120,000 IN204-01 t FIVE YEARWORKPROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-27 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Cloverdale Rd Bridge #344 a Replace bridge and widen to accommodate bike lanes. Bridge is located south of Hubbard over the New York Canal. Construction Year. 2010 ACHD Portion: $698,000 Previous Expenditures $140,000 Project Total: $838,000 Cole Rd Bridge #350 Replace bridge and widen from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, including guardrails. Bridge is located over the New York Canal, between Victory and Desert (Indian Lakes area). 2006-2010 FYWP funding is for completion of construction in 2006. Construction Year. 2006 ACHD Portion: $425,000 Previous Expenditures $1,913,000 Project Total: $2,338,000 Desert Ave Bridge #347 Rehabilitate bridge and add sidewalk south side of the structure to connect with adjacent sidewalks. Bridge is located 0.8 mile west of Cole, over the New York Canal. Construction Year. 2006 ACHD Portion: $78,000 Previous Expenditures $160,000 Project Total: $228,000 12/28/2004 2-28 Fairview Ave #418a $ #418aa Scour protection project would install piles under the two piers that have the greatest scour potential. Bridge is located on Boise River, 0.25 miles west of 27th St. Construction Year.- 2010 ACHD Portion: $1,009,000 Previous Expenditures $175,000 Project Total: $1,184,000 Liberty St Bridge #409 Rehabilitate deck and bring rails up to current standards (bridge, transition, approach, end treatment). Bridge located on Liberty, 100 - feet north of Franklin over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Construction Year.- PD ACHD Portion: $83,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $83,000 Old Horseshoe Bend Rd #42a Full bridge replacement. Located 114 -mile north of Hill Road over the Farmers Union Canal. Construction Year. PD ACHD Portion: $195,000 Previous Expenditures $118,000 Project Total: $313,000 t`NJ FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-29 ParkCenter Blvd --East River Crossing Construct river crossing, 4 lanes, connecting the eastern terminus ParkCenter Blvd with Warm Springs Avenue. Project includes bridge structure and roadways connecting termini. Funding in 2008 for potential design updates. Construction Year: 2010 ACHD Portion: $10,782,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Tota/.'$10,782,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 •�k4nw 1Y ',AA 5 _ f�J' ��=:� ^�'�' '� ��� • ...qtr gRksA 12/28/2004 2-30 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Cloverdale #135 Located north of Ustick Rd, behind Maverick convenience store. Bridge to be replaced as part of Boise City's sewer expansion project. 0 Construction Year: PD usr,orc W ec�rr W ACHD Portion: $216,000 Previous Expenditures $0 W Project Total: $216,000 King Road Bridge #336 Replace and widen bridge to 3 lanes. 500' east of Black Cat Road over the Benton Lateral. Construction Year. 2009 ACHD Portion: $60,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $60,000 Lake Hazel #304 Replace and widen to 5 lanes with possible pipe. 114 -mile west of Ten Mile Road over the Harris Lateral. The existing structure is narrow and deficient. Construction Year., 2010 ACHD Portion: $130,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $130,000 12/28/2004 2-31 PD Bridge Rehab, Replacement and Rail Program Placeholder for future bridge projects not yet identified. Construction Year: PD ACHD Portion: $930,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $930,000 Robinson Rd #184, S 1 O Kuna-Mora Replace and widen to 3 lanes. 0.7 miles south of Kuna-Mora Road over the North Power Lateral. Construction Year: 2007 ACHD Portion: $159,000 Previous Expenditures $60,000 Project Total: $219,000 Victory Rd, 1 14 mile east of Locust Grove #296 Replace and widen to 5 lanes. 0. 2 miles east of Locust Grove over the Eight Mile Lateral. The existing structure is narrow and several new subdivisions in the area have increased the amount of traffic in the area. Construction Year: 2010 ACHD Portion: $155,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $155,000 { FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 NO MAP AVAILABLE 12/28/2004 2-32 Wylie Lane # 93 Replace and widen to 3 lanes. 0.1 miles south of State St over the Boise Valley Canal. The existing structure is listed as restricted. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $114,000 Previous Expenditures $50,000 Project Total_ $164,000 FIVE YEAR -WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-33 f FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 01st Street W, Washington 1 Cherry Lane Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on west side of the roadway.' i Construction Year. 2007 ACHD Portion: $589,000 ~ `- Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $589,000 —_. ASHIN.c:c WMMAN r 4z 08th Street, 1400 W 8th 1 Cherry Lane Install sidewalks along 8th Street to connect sidewalk system to Meridian Middle School. ACHD is working with the City of Meridian on STP -Enhancement application for 2008 construction. Construction Year: 2008 ACHD Portion: $52,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $407,000 42nd St, Chinden Blvd (US 20126) 1 Adams St - RSP Install curb, gutter and sidewalk. Rebuild the street as necessary. Construction Year. • 2006 ACHD Portion: $267,000 Previous Expenditures $165,000 Project Total: $632,000 12/28/2004 2-34 51st Street, Acworth 1 Boise River Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $53,000 Previous Expenditures $50,000 Project Total. $191,000 Catalpa, Collister Dr 1 Hawthorne Install curb, gutter and sidewalks. ACHD is partnering with ValleyRide on a FTA 5309 funding application for this project. Construction year to be determined based on outcome of grant application. Construction Year. OF ACHD Portion: $252,1.00 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $355,000 Highland, 1016 West Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on one -block portion of Highland between Denver and Broadway. Possible combination with Highland, Broad way/Pa rkCenter project scheduled for construction in 2006. Construction Year: 2006 ACHD Portion: $31,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total. $31,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-35 Lubkin, Bruins 1 Curtis Frontage and Bruins, Lubkin 1 Northview Install sidewalk. Construction Year 2006 ACHD Portion: $169,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $969,000 Preece ©r. N side, Cole 1 Ethridge Fill in sidewalk gaps. Construction Year: OF ACHD Portion: $440,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total: $440,000 Roosevelt St, 1-84 I NY Canal - RSP Install curb, gutter and possibly sidewalk (dependent on design and construction) on west side. This is a collector roadway. Construction Year. 2006 ACHD Portion: $101,000 Previous Expenditures $30,000 Project Total: $131,000 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12128/2004 2-36 Roosevelt St, Bethel / W. Emerald Widen shoulder and install extruded curb on east side of Roosevelt. Project is partnership with Boise Paries & Recreation. Construction Year. • 2Q07 ACHD Portion: $119,000 Previous Expenditures $0 Project Total• $134,000 Warm Springs / Granite Way 1 Penitentiary Enhancement Project Construction of arches designating entry into Historic Warm Springs Avenue and East End, placement of interpretive plaques at those arches, bicycle and pedestrian improvements at the intersection of Granite Way / Old Penitentiary and Warm Springs Avenue. Project also includes the landscaping of an oval within proposed roundabout at the intersection. Community Program portion is for roadway improvements not eligible under the STP -E program. Construction Year.• 2007 ACHD Portion: $23,000 Previous Expenditures $105,000 Project Total: $481,000 C) FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 2-37 This Page Left Blank Intentionally SECTION 3. Other Capital Programs & Projects Table of Contents Page No. ROADWAY PROGRAM Corridor Preservation Projects 3-1 CP206 2006 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 CP207 2007 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 CP208 2008 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 CP209 2009 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 3 - 1 CP210 2010 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 CPPD PD Corridor Preservation—impact Fee Eligible Corridor Preservation Projects Non -Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCP206 2006 Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCP207 2007 Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCP208 2008 Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCP209 2009 Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCP210 2010 Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible 3-1 NCPPD PD Corridor Preservation—Non-Impact Fee Eligible TRAFFIC PROGRAM Traffic Signal Upgrades 3-1 TSU206 2006 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 3-1 TSU207 2007 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 3-1 TSU208 2008 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 3-1 TSU209 2009 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 3-1 TSU210 2010 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 3 - 1 TSUPD PD Traffic Signals New & Upgrades Commuteride Projects 3-2 RS203-07 Paris & Ride - City of Kuna 3-2 RS026 Park & Ride -1-84, Cole Rd 1 Broadway Area Traffic Management Projects 3-2 TRM205-02 1-84 Automated Incident Management System 3-2 TRM205-04 MeridianTraffic Signal System Upgrade 3-2 TRM205-01 Orchard Street Traffic Signal Upgrade 3-2 TRO64 Traffic Management Center Expansion 3-2 TRM205-03 Vista Ave Traffic Signal System Upgrade ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROGRAM Storm Drain Projects 3-2 DR033.01 Brookhollow Storm Drain 3 - 2 DR208 Hickories Subdivision Storm Drain 3 - 3 DR209 Northview and Maple Grove Rd Storm Drain 3-3 DR212 Northwest Boise Regional Storm Drain System 3 - 3 DR202a Ustick Rd Storm Drain (South Slough By-pass) 3-3 DR210 Vista Ave Regional Storm Drain System Miscellaneous Drainage 3-3 DR214 Five Mile Rd Regional Pond 3-3 DR215 Five Mile Rd Trunk Line MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Miscellaneous Maintenance Projects 3-3 MMP204-03 Star Shoulder Widening Surface Maintenance Projects 3-3 FA0206 2006 Federal Aid Overlays 3-4 OV206 2006 Local Overlay Projects 3-4 MCS206 2006 Maintenance Crack Seal 3-4 MSL206 2006 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-4 M0206 2006 Maintenance Scrub Coat 3-4 OV207 2007 Local Overlay Projects 3-4 MCS207 2007 Maintenance Crack Seal 3-4 MSL207 2007 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-4 M0207 2007 Maintenance Scrub Coat 3-4 FA0208 2008 Federal Aid Overlays 3-4 OV208 2008 Local Overlay Projects 3-4 MCS208 2008 Maintenance Crack Seal 3-4 MSL208 2008 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-4 M0208 2008 Maintenance Scrub Coat 3-4 FA0209 2009 Federal Aid Overlays 3-4 OV209 2009 Local Overlay Projects 3-4 MCS209 2009 Maintenance Crack Seal 3-4 MSL209 2009 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-4 M0209 2009 Maintenance Scrub Coat 3-4 FA0210 2010 Federal Aid Overlays 3-4 OV210 2010 Local Overlay Projects 3-4 MCS210 2010 Maintenance Crack Seal 3-4 MSL210 2010 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-4 M0210 2010 Maintenance Scrub Coat 3-4 FAOPD PD Federal Aid Overlays 3 - 5 OVPD PD Local Overlay Projects - Collectors & Arterials 3-5 MCSPD PD Maintenance Crack Seal 3-5 MSLPD PD Maintenance Cul-de-Sac 3-5 MOPD PD Maintenance Scrub Coat MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Miscellaneous Projects 3-5 MS203-01 ACHD Administration Second Story Addition COOPERATIVE PROGRAM Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 IC206 2006 Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 IC207 2007 Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 IC208 2008 Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 IC209 2009 Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 IC210 2010 Inspectors Cooperative 3-5 ICPD PD Inspectors Cooperative Developers Cooperative 3-5 DC206 2006 Developers Cooperative Projects 3-5 DC207 2007 Developers Cooperative Projects 3-5 DC208 2008 Developers Cooperative Projects 3-5 DC209 2009 Developers Cooperative Projects 3-5 DC210 2010 Developers Cooperative Projects 3-5 DCPD PD Developers Cooperative Projects State Highway Cooperative 3-5 SH2O6 2006 State Highway Cooperative Projects 3-6 SH2O7 2007 State Highway Cooperative Projects 3-6 SH2O8 2008 State Highway Cooperative Projects 3-6 SH2O9 2009 State Highway Cooperative Projects 3-6 SH210 2010 State Highway Cooperative Projects 3-6 SHPD PD State Highway Cooperative Projects COMMUNITY PROGRAM Minor Field Improvement Projects 3 - 6 CC206 2006 Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 SR206 2006 Sidewalk Repair 3-6 CC207 2007 Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 SR207 2007 Sidewalk Repair 3-6 CC208 2008 Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 SR208 2008 Sidewalk Repair 3-6 CC209 2009 Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 SR209 2009 Sidewalk Repair 3-6 SR210 2010 Sidewalk Repair 3-6 CC210 2010 Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 CCPD PD Misc Concrete Repairs 3-6 SRPD PD Sidewalk Repair Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Projects 3-6 NE206 2006 Residential Streets 3-6 RTF206 2006 Road Trust Fund Projects 3-6 NE207 2007 Residential Streets 3-7 RTF207 2007 Road Trust Fund Projects 3-7 NE208 2008 Residential Streets 3-7 RTF208 2008 Road Trust Fund Projects 3-7 NE209 2009 Residential Streets 3-7 RTF209 2009 Road Trust Fund Projects 3-7 NE210 2010 Residential Streets 3-7 RTF210 2010 Road Trust Fund Projects 3-7 NEPD PD Residential Streets 3-7 RTFPD PD Road Trust Fund Projects Safe Route 1 School Projects 3-7 BK206 2006 Bikeway Projects 3-7 SS206 2006 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 3-7 BK207 2007 Bikeway Projects 3-7 SS207 2007 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 3-7 BK208 2008 Bikeway Projects 3-7 SS208 2008 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 3 - 7 BK209 2009 Bikeway Projects 3-7 SS209 2009 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 3-7 BK210 2010 Bikeway Projects 3-7 SS210 2010 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 3-7 BKPD PD Bikeway Projects 3-7 SSPD PD School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program Community Program Setaside 3-7 CPS206 2006 Community Program Setaside 3 - 7 CPS207 2007 Community Program Setaside 3-7 CPS208 2008 Community Program Setaside 3-8 CPS209 - 2009 Community Program Setaside 3-8 CPS210 2010 Community Program Setaside 3-8 CPSPD PD Community Program Setaside FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 3-1 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Total COR. 1bOR,P`RESERVAT101d PROJECTS .- 2006 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 2006 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 This item is for purchasing right-of-way and paying for roadway improvements through development on arterials identified in ACHD's Capital Improvements Plan (2003). 2007 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 2007 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2008 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 2008 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2009 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 2009 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2010 Corridor Preservation - Impact Fee Eligible 2010 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 PD Corridor Preservation --impact Fee Eligible PD $3,500,000 $3,500,000 C0RR1DfJR PRESERVATION PRt]JECTS Nr3N IMPACT FEE ELiG1B1�E 2006 Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible $250,000 $250,000 This item is for purchasing right-of-way for projects that are not included in ACHD's Capital Improvements Plan (2003). 2007 Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible $250,000 $250,000 2008 Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible $250,000 $250,000 2009 Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible $250,000 $250,000 2010 Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible $250,000 $250,000 PD Corridor Preservation--Non-Impact Fee Eligible ProgramTraffic $450,000 .... $450,000 -intelligent Commuterlde TRAFFIC:SIGNAI_ UPGRAI3ES vhm Transportation projects. System (ITS) projects andACHD 2006 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 2006 $300,000 $300,000 This program allows for rebuilding traffic signals, including poles and mast arms, as well as detection and electrical systems when the need for traffic control arises. Often done in conjunction with street modifications related to proposed development, utility work, or locations where not previously identified and budgeted. 2007 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 2007 $300,000 $300,000 2008 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 2008 $300,000 $300,000 2009 Traffic Signals New & Upgraded 2009 $300,000 $300,000 2010 Traffic Signals New & upgraded 2010 $300,000 $300,000 PD Traffic Signals New & Upgrades PD $550,000 $550,000 12/28/2004 3-1 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Hickories Subdivision Storm Drain PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. Address roadway flooding problem located near Hewlett-Packard off Hickory Drive and Fifeshire. Project includes piping to convey water outside of the subdivision to an adequate stormwater storage facility. 12/28/2004 3-2 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Total CO. . MMUTERIDEPROJECTS Park & Ride - City of Kuna 2006 $82,000 $418,000 New Park & Ride lot in the City of Kuna with 50 to 75 parking spaces, location to be determined. Commuteride will apply for 5309 funds for professional services, right-of-way and construction. Park & Ride -1-84, Cole Rd 1 Broadway Area 2009 $221,000 $1,101,000 Construct Park & Ride facility of 100 parking spaces. Commuteride will apply for 5309 funds for professional services, right-of-way and construction. TRAFFIC WANAGEME NT PROJECTS 1-84 Automated Incident Management System 2008 $40,000 $435,000 PROJECT DEPENDENT ON ACCEPTANCE OF 2008 CMAQ APPLICATION. Jointly sponsored project with ITD to install 6 miles of fiber optic cable and 5 CCTV cameras, and 11 vehicle detection station on 1-84 between Meridian Rd (SH69) and Garrity Blvd. MeridianTraffic Signal System Upgrade 2007 $50,000 $250,000 Project will replace outdated traffic signal controllers and cabinets in downtown Meridian. These new controllers will be tied into ACHD's Traffic Management Center. Orchard Street Traffic Signal Upgrade 2008 $20,000 $160,000 PROJECT DEPENDENT ON ACCEPTANCE OF 2008 CMAQ APPLICATION. Project will replace 11 outdated traffic signal controllers and cabinets on Orchard. These controllers will be tied into ACHD's Traffic Management Center. Traffic cameras and fiber optic cable on included with this project. Traffic Management Center Expansion PD $1$0,000 $2,460,000 Study to determine the location of a new 10,000 sq. ft. facility to house staff and equipment. Assumed in ACHD rlw, but determination yet to be made. Vista Ave Traffic Signal System Upgrade 2006 $25,000 $150,000 Project will replace 11 outdated traffic signal controllers and cabinets along Vista Avenue. These new controllers will be tied into ACHD's Traffic Management Center- ' ... .. - .. - ... ... STORM Q'RAIN PROJECTS Brookhollow Storm Drain PD $376,000 $376,000 Address persistent roadway drainage storage problem in Stephanie'e Stonegate Subdivision near E. Boise and E. Iowa. Project includes rehabilitation of existing stormwater storage facility or developing a new stormwater storage facility. Hickories Subdivision Storm Drain PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. Address roadway flooding problem located near Hewlett-Packard off Hickory Drive and Fifeshire. Project includes piping to convey water outside of the subdivision to an adequate stormwater storage facility. 12/28/2004 3-2 FIVE YEARWORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Total Northview and Maple Grove Rd Storm Drain $0 $0 PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. This project will resolve a persistent roadway flooding problem at Northview and Maple Grove. Coordinate with Maple Grove, Fairview/Ustick project. Northwest Boise Regional Storm Drain System $0 $0 PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. Tied to existing drainage problems in NW Boise that point to a regional solution outside of the subdivision (located near Edna & Elgin). Further study & concept required before committing to a specific year in the FYWP. Ustick Rd Storm Drain (South Slough By-pass) $0 $0 PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. Project will provide the roadway drainage infrastructure to prepare ACHD for future widening of Ustick and adjacent roadways. This project will also provide a conveyance for stormwater overflows from existing Locust Grove roadway stormwater ponds and the South Slough. Vista Ave Regional Storm Drain System $160,000 $160,000 This project will preserve a future pond site to resolve existing roadway drainage problems in the neighborhood behind the Vista Village Shopping Center. It will also provide the infrastructure for curb, gutter and sidewalk projects proposed for the area, including support of Overland, Vista/Federal Way road widening project. M1SCELLANEO[XS DRAINAGE Five Mile Rd Regional Pond $0 $0 PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. This project is required to provide stormwater storage requirements for a Five Mile Regional Drain system (north of McMillan and south of Chinden). Right-of-way in 2006 is for pond site. Five Mile Rd Trunk Line $0 $0 PROJECT REMOVED FROM FYWP PENDING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY DRAINAGE PROJECTS. Extend a stormwater trunk line south from Treeline to McMillan to relieve existing stormwater problems (Hickories Subdivision) in this area and complete a regional roadway system for this neighborhood. ■ .. .- MCSCELLARb S MAINTENANCE PROJECTS .,. ........, ,.,r . ...,,_ ......... ..... ........ w.,, . _._ . �. _,..._ .....__.... ,.,..., ..,. ,.w... ........ ,.... Star Shoulder Widening 2010 $175,000 $965,000 This project will widen shoulders on Star Road from 2 -feet to 8 -feet wide and replace guardrail for safety purposes. SURFACE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS a . .,....r. _ ....... 2006 Federal Aid Overlays 2006 $40,000 $530,000 Federal Aid Overlay program for arterials.and collectors. 12/28/2004 3-3 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 3-4 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Total 2006 Local Overlay Projects 2006 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Collectors & Arterials Program is for asphalt overlays at various locations to prolong roadway life. 2006 Maintenance Crack Seal 2006 $100,000 $100,000 This category is for crack seal projects that protect the base of roadways that do not justify the need for a scrub coating or an overlay. 2006 Maintenance Cul -de -Sac 2006 $200,000 $200,000 This category is for chipseal projects on cul-de-sacs. Cul-de-sac chip seal projects require special materials and equipment and, therefore, are done by contractors. 2006 Maintenance Scrub Coat 2006 $900,000 $900,000 The category is for scrub coat projects, which Is a thin -lift overlay that rehabs the top layer of asphalt to preserve the base of the roadway. 2007 Local Overlay Projects 2007 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2007 Maintenance Crack Seal 2007 $125,000 $125,000 2007 Maintenance Cul -de -Sac 2007 $250,000 $250,000 2007 Maintenance Scrub Coat 2007 $900,000 $900,000 2008 Federal Aid Overlays 2008 $88,000 $1,300,000 2008 Local Overlay Projects 2008 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2008 Maintenance Crack Seal - 2008 $125,000 $125,000 2008 Maintenance Cul -de -Sac 2008 $250,000 $250,000 2008 Maintenance Scrub Coat 2008 $900,000 $900,000 2009 Federal Aid Overlays 2009 $44,000 $580,000 2009 Local Overlay Projects 2009 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2009 Maintenance Crack Seal 2009 $100,000 $100,000 2009 Maintenance Cul -de -Sac 2009 $200,000 $200,000 2009 Maintenance Scrub Coat 2009 $900,000 $900,000 2010 Federal Aid Overlays 2010 $44,000 $580,000 2010 Local Overlay Projects 2010 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2010 Maintenance Crack Seal 2010 $125,000 $125,000 2010 Maintenance Cut -de -Sac 2010 $250,000 $250,000 2010 Maintenance Scrub Coat 2010 $900,000 $900,000 PD Federal Aid Overlays PD $83,000 $1,100,000 12/28/2004 3-4 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 3-5 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Total PD Local Overlay Projects PD $2,000,000 $2,000,000 PD Maintenance Crack Seal PD $300,000 $300,000 PD Maintenance Cul -de -Sac PD $500,000 $500,000 PD Maintenance Scrub Coat PD $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Miscellaneous Projects MI�GELLANi�Ot1'S PROJECTS' ACHD Administration Second Story Addition PD $1,070,000 $2,040,000 ACHD COMMUTERIDE HAS APPLIED FOR FTA 5309 FUNDING FOR THE PORTION OF THIS BUILDING THAT WOULD ACCOMMODATE COMMUTERIDE STAFF. Complete design of the ACHD Improvement Design. [N5 01 6. COOPERATIVE 2006 Inspectors Cooperative 2006 $75,000 $75,000 This item is for cost-sharing projects that are identified by ACHD inspectors during the inspection process. 2007 Inspectors Cooperative 2007 $75,000 $75,000 2008 Inspectors Cooperative 2008 $75,000 $75,000 2009 Inspectors Cooperative 2009 $75,000 $75,000 2010 Inspectors Cooperative 2010 $75,000 $75,000 PD Inspectors Cooperative PD $150,000 $150,000 DEVELOPERS GQUPEF2ATIVI= 2006 Developers Cooperative Projects 2006 $60,000 $60,000 Program includes cost-sharing projects with developers that complement another ACHD project or developer project to mace a functional and complete system. 2007 Developers Cooperative Projects 2007 $60,000 $60,000 2008 Developers Cooperative Projects 2008 $60,000 $60,000 2009 Developers Cooperative Projects 2009 $60,000 $60,000 2010 Developers Cooperative Projects 2010 $60,000 $60,000 PD Developers Cooperative Projects PD $120,000 $120,000 STATE HIGHWAY COOERATl1lE 2006 State Highway Cooperative Projects 2006 $170,000 $170,000 Programs is for ACHD's cooperation with ITD roadway projects. This typically includes improvements to ACHD roadways at State or U.S. Highway intersections. 12/28/2004 3-5 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 3_6 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Tota! 2007 State Highway Cooperative Projects 2007 $170,000 $170,000 2008 State Highway Cooperative Projects 2008 $170,000 $170,000 2009 State Highway Cooperative Projects 2009 $170,000 $170,000 2010 State Highway Cooperative Projects $170,000 $170,000 PD State Highway Cooperative Projects PD $300,000 $300,000 MINgR FIEi_D [MPROVEMIWNT'PROJEGTS ..,__.,, ...: e...,..: _..._, , r 2006 Misc Concrete Repairs 2006 $125,000 $125,000 Projects include repair to existing curb, gutter and pedestrian ramps, as well as installation of new pedestrian ramps at intersections with existing sidewalks. 2006 Sidewalk Repair 2006 $195,000 $195,000 Program is for repair or replacement of existing hazardous sidewalks. ACHD participation determined in accordance with the District's sidewalk repair policy. 2007 Misc Concrete Repairs 2007 $125,000 $125,000 2007 Sidewalk Repair 2007 $195,000 $195,000 2008 Misc Concrete Repairs 2008 $110,000 $110,000 2008 Sidewalk Repair 2008 $160,000 $160,000 2009 Misc Concrete Repairs 2009 $110,000 $110,000 2009 Sidewalk Repair 2009 $160,000 $160,000 2010 Misc Concrete Repairs 2010 $100,000 $100,000 2010 Sidewalk Repair 2010 $150,000 $150,000 PD Misc Concrete Repairs PD $200,000 $200,000 PD Sidewalk Repair PD $300,000 $300,000 CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWAI K PRC?JI=CTS 2006 Residential Streets 2006 $0 $0 Program is for roadway, sidewalk and traffic calming projects on residential streets resulting from community requests. individual 2006 projects listed separately. Funds under this project are for construction cost adjustments and potential design for future projects. 2006 Road Trust Fund Projects 2006 $55,000 $55,000 This program is for the construction of improvements for which developers have made a deposit for a portion of the work, and where it was not practical for construction at the time of development. 2007 Residential Streets 2007 $90,000 $90,000 12/28/2004 3_6 l FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 12/28/2004 3-7 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Tota! 2007 Road Trust Fund Projects 2007 $55,000 $55,000 2008 Residential Streets 2008 $850,000 $850,000 2008 Road Trust Fund Projects 2008 $55,000 $55,000 2009 Residential Streets 2009 $825,000 $825,000 2009 Road Trust Fund Projects 2009 $55,000 $55,000 2010 Residential Streets 2010 $725,000 $725,000 2010 Road Trust Fund Projects 2010 $55,000 $55,000 PD Residential Streets PD $1,050,000 $1,050,000 PD Road Trust Fund Projects PD $100,000 $100,000 SAFI ROUTE I SCHOOL PRbJECTS. 2006 Bikeway Projects 2006 $35,000 $35,000 This program is for bikeway projects within ACHD right-of-way that complete existing gaps in the bikeway system. These may include striping roads, adding shoulder width, paving select sections and re- routing bikeways. 2006 School & Pedestrian I Safety Program 2006 $290,000 $290,000 This program is typically for sidewalks on school routes, school flashing beacons pedestrian signals, and lighting for bus stops. 2007 Bikeway Projects 2007 $35,000 $35,000 2007 School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program 2007 $310,000 $310,000 2008 Bikeway Projects 2008 $30,000 $30,000 2008 School & Pedestrian / Safety Program 2008 $260,000 $260,000 2009 Bikeway Projects 2009 $30,000 $30,000 2009 School & Pedestrian I Safety Program 2009 $280,000 $280,000 2010 Bikeway Projects $30,000 $30,000 2010 School & Pedestrian / Safety Program 2010 $270,000 $270,000 PD Bikeway Projects PD $50,000 $50,000 PD School & Pedestrian 1 Safety Program PD $420,000 $420,000 Cb11111VilNITY PROGRAM SETASIpE ` 2006 Community Program Setaside 2006 $500,000 $500,000 This allocation will serve as a placeholder for projects identified in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Transition Plan. 2007 Community Program Setaside 2007 $500,000 $500,000 2008 Community Program Setaside 2008 $500,000 $500,000 12/28/2004 3-7 2009 Community Program Setaside 2010 Community Program Setaside PD Community Program Setaside 12128/2004 FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM - FY 06-10 Construction Year ACHD Portion Project Tota! 2009 $500,000 $500,000 2010 $500,000 $500,000 PD $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Section 4 Appendix Coordination with Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) ACHD and ITD work closely to coordinate project construction features and scheduling. Each year, ITD adopts a Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that includes projects planned in ITD's District 3 (Southwest Idaho). All ACHD Federal Aid projects are included in the STIP and are also referenced in the FYWP. There are a number of projects planned by ITD that will also impact ACHD's local highway system that are not included in the FYWP. Below is a listing of those projects and the current construction year as identified in the STIP: Overpass Rehabilitation: ITD routinely programs rehabilitation projects on overpasses of Interstates 84 and 184. These are not roadway widening projects. In most cases, these overpasses are ACHD roadways. These projects are: o Curtis Road Overpass (1-184) 2005 o Orchard Street Overpass (1-84) 2007 o Vista Avenue Overpass (1-84) 2007 a Five Mile Overpass (1-84) 2009 Intersection Projects: These are either rebuild or expansion projects to ACHDIITD intersections with improvements funded by ITD: o State Hwy 16 & Floating Feather 2009 ■ Add northbound right turn lane o State Hwy 44 & Glenwood/Gary PD ■ Resurface intersection with concrete o Eagle Rd (SH55) & McMillan 2009 ■ Add turn lanes; project part of State Hwy 55 operational improvements. Major Capital Studies Below is a listing of major capital studies ACHD is planning to conduct within the timeframe of the 2006-2010 Five -Year Work Program. These studies are typically financed through departmental budgets or Federal Aid funding. Studies can be added to or deleted from this list throughout the year based on need, budget, priority and outside funding sources. • Downtown Boise Mobility Study: ACHD is working with ValleyRide, CCDC, the City of Boise and Boise State University on this study to examine the movement of vehicles, pedestrians and goods in and around the Downtown Boise area. This study will be completed spring 2005. • Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan: The purpose of the study is to adopt a transportation management plan that lends itself to making downtown the heart of the community and the center of the valley. As Meridian continues to grow, the elements of the downtown street system, (including capacity, walk -ability, and livability) now need to be re-examined to ensure the continued vibrancy of the downtown area. Study to be completed February 2005. 4-1 • Floating Feather Alignment Study: Study will identify an alignment of Floating Feather north of SH 44 and east of SH16 that will eliminate the "stair -step" roadway that currently exists. Once alignment is identified, projects may be development -driven. • Kuna-Mora 1 SH69 Alignment Study: Study will identify alignment for connection between current southern terminus of SH69 and Kuna-Mora Road. Alignment could follow along the north side of UPRR tracks. • Lake Hazel Extension 1 Gowen Road Relocation: ACRD, in conjunction with the Boise Airport, is conducting this study to identify an extension of Lake Hazel Road and possible relocation of Gowen Road as a result of the Boise Airport's plan to construct a new taxiway and upgrade the third runway to commercial and public standards. The proposed extension/relocation will connect Lake Hazel Road from Cole Road to 1-84 at Isaac's Canyon Interchange (Exit 59). The agreement related to the alignment study is still being negotiated with the Boise Airport. The study is expected to commence in 2005. • Park & Ride Location Studies: Commuteride is applying for Federal Transit Administration funds for Park & Ride lots in Kuna and East Boise along 1-84 between Cole and Broadway. The proposed Kuna Park & Ride lot is anticipated to be located on a parcel that ACHD currently owns. • Pedestrian & Bicycle Transition Plan: This project will meet the obligation to ensure mobility options for all community residents, including the general need to provide non -motorized facilities, to have safe routes to school and to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Data collectors catalogued the sidewalk and bikeway system, the availability of ramps and the condition of facilities. Data will be used to develop a plan that addresses ADA compliance needs in Ada County and identifies priorities for funding. • State Street Corridor Study, Phase 2: This study will follow-up on recommendations approved in 2004 under the initial State Street Corridor Study. A partnership with the City of Boise and Garden City, the work will focus on implementing land use and transportation concepts endorsed in the first phase, including comprehensive plans and regulations. • Traffic Management Center, Location and Concept: This study will identify a location and begin design work for a regional Traffic Management Center. Discussions are underway with other agencies regarding potential tenants. • Urban Interchange Concept: This study will produce a concept for one of the urban interchanges included in COMPASS Destination 2025 Regional Transportation Plan. An urban interchange is similar to freeway interchange in function, but is located at the intersection of two major non -interstate roadways such as Eagle Road (State Hwy 55) and Fairview Ave. Urban interchanges require less right-of-way than a standard freeway interchange. • West Bench Lane Configuration: This study will examine ultimate right-of-way and future lanes needs in the West Bench area (Eagle/Cole & Fairview/Chinden). 4-2 Projected Major Development -led Projects Below is a listing of major new roadway projects or roadway extension projects that ACRD anticipates could be constructed by new commercial or residential development. ACRD frequently enters into agreements with local developers to construct new roadways or widen existing roadway to benefit the highway system. These projects can be constructed by developers at significant cost savings when compared to the cost for ACHD to construct them. The timeline of the project is dependent upon development of property in the area. • Allumbaugh, Franklin to Cassia • Corporate Drive, west of Meridian Road + Eisenman Road extension to Isaac's Canyon interchange • Floating Feather, east and west of SH16 • Hill Road, west of Edgewood to State • Lake Hazel extension, portions from Maple Grove to Isaac's Canyon interchange • Pine, Locust Grove to Eagle + Plaza Drive, 2nd St. to Iron Eagle • Ustick Rd, Leslie Way to Duane Dr. 4-3 COMMISSION DISTRICT INFORMATION A five -member Commission governs the ACRD. The term of office for each Commissioner is based on a rotation schedule designated by law. The Board of Commissioners meets in formal weekly sessions. For the location of each of the commissioner's sub -district please see the map on the foliowin a e. District Number Commissioner Sub -District 1 Commissioner Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President Sub -District 2 Commissioner David E. Wynkoop, 1 st Vice President Sub -District 3 Commissioner John S. Franden, President Sub -District 4 Commissioner Sherry R. Huber Sub -District 5 Commissioner Dave Bivens 4-3 Ada County Highway District AC 49P� 2004 Commission Subdistrict Boundaries 0 2 4 s a 10 Mmes 4-4