HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 08-01
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 1,1995 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JULY 18, 1995:
(APPROVED)
1 . TABLED JULY 18, 1995: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF C-G
FOR 74 ACRES BY E.l. SEWS: (TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 15,1995)
2. TABLED JULY 18,1995: PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR MIXED, PLANNED BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES BY
E.l. BEWS: (TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 15, 1995)
3. TABLED JULY 18, 1995: FINAL PLAT: WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION NO.
S, 52 LOTS BY RAMON YORGASON: (TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 15,1995)
4. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
FOR ENGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION BY REWABHAI PATEL: (APPROVED)
5. ORDINANCE #707 - W.H. MOORE ANNEXATIONI C-G: (APPROVED)
6. ORDINANCE #708 - LEEANN LONGSON ANNEXATIONI CMG: (APPROVED)
7. ORDINANCE #709 - PACKARD SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION: (APPROVED)
8. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION BY PNE/EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION (TABLED JULY 18,1995): (APPROVED WITH
CONDITIONS)
9. RESOLUTION #161 - PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION FEES: (TABLED UNTIL
AUGUST 15, 1995)
10. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT FOR TURTLE CREEK
SUBDIVISION: (APPROVED FOR ONE YEAR)
11. NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES NO.1:
(APPROVED)
12. WATERlSEWERlTRASH DELINQUENCIES: (APPROVED)
13. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED)
14. DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
A. GARY SMITH, Y ENGINEER:
1. SEWERfWAT.::R LATE COMERS AGREEMENT FOR SPORTSMAN POINTE
(APPROVED)
2. CHANGE ORDER REQUEST FOR BOILER AND DIGESTER NO.1 REHAB:
(APPROVED)
3. STRIPING ON EAST SECOND STREET:
4. CLARIFIERlHEADWORKS PREDESIGN:(APPROVE KELLER ASSOCIATES)
15. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 1. 1995
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant
Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Bob Corrie, Ron Tolsma:
OTHERS PRESENT: Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Chief Gordon, Bruce
Stuart, Anna Doty, Ted Hutchinson, Malcolm MacCoy, Helen Sharp, Dale Sharp, Robert
Donahue, Ali Bonacta:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JULY 18,1995:
Kingsford: Are there any changes to those minutes?
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move they be approved.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of the July 18th minutes, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: I understood Mr. Morrow was going to have a representative from APA?
Morrow: Apparently he is not here as of yet, so we will just press on until he gets here.
ITEM#1: TASLED JULY 18,1995: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF C-
G FOR 74 ACRES BY EL. BEWS:
ITEM #1: TABLED JULY 18, 1995: PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR MIXED, PLANNED BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES BY EL.
SEWS:
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to table those until the next meeting.
Morrow: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table items 1 and 2 to the next meeting, all
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 2
ITEM #3: TABLED JULY 18,1995: FINAL PLAT: WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION
NO.5, 52 LOTS BY RAMON YORGASON:
Kingsford: The engineer has requested it be tabled until the next meeting, entertain a
motion to that effect.
Yerrington: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to table item 3 until the next meeting, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #4: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE
REQUEST FOR ENGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION BY REWABHAI PATEL:
Kingsford: Any question about those findings?
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the
variance request for Englewood Subdivision.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the findings of fact and conclusions
of law as written for Englewood Subdivision, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Is there a motion on the decision?
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, that it is decided the variance from 11-9-60411 is hereby granted and
that the plat must be recorded on or before April 5, 1996 at the requirements of 11-9-616
shall be complied with, with the one year to begin construction or commence start as of
April 5, 1995.
Kingsford: I think that should be 1996, amend that to 1996.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 3
Tolsma: 1996
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of the decision, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #5: ORDINANCE #707 - W.H. MOORE ANNEXATION/ C-G:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED
IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Who is out of order over there?
Crookston: I am, we are just discussing your change of 1995 to 1996 on the previous
agenda item. That should be April 5, 1995, then they have one year to commence
construction. But the one year starts as of April 5, 1995.
Morrow: It would terminate as of April 5, 1996.
Kingsford: So it is correct as written?
Crookston: Yes, I think you need a motion to accept it as written.
Yerrington: So moved
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to approve the decision as written ,all those in
favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Is there anyone from the public that would like to have ordinance #707 read in
its entirety, this is for the audience's information property just to the west of the Sandman
Motel. Half of that was annexed and half of it wasn't. Seeing no one I would entertain a
motion to approve.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 4
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would move we approve Ordinance #707 for the W.H. Moore
Annexation with suspension of the rules.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of Ordinance #707 with suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Seeing our representative from APA, maybe, Walt if you would introduce him
and the Council can hear those comments.
Morrow: Ali is here from APA to give us a briefing on the traffic study and the ongoings
there with respect to the interchange and the surrounding land use planning at Eagle
Road, the freeway, Overland, Franklin and those four quadrants. So he will bring us up
to speed as to where APA is with that. Erv Olen if you recall was here 30 days ago
requesting our cooperation with the study. What Ali is going to discuss is where that study
has come to.
Bonacta: Thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the Council. I am Ali Bonacta, project
manager with Ada Planning Association. About a month ago ACHD requested Ada
Planning Association to look at the traffic situation at the intersection of Eagle Road and
1-84 ramps. The reason for that I think was there were several development proposals for
that area and what ACHD was getting was individual studies for individual land use
purposes. They had one study for the so called power center mall. They had one study
for the St. Luke's facilities, and they needed to know the cumulative impacts of all of these
developments as well as the spin off developments that these proposals will generate.
They didn't have any studies that would take into consideration the total effects of these
proposals. That is what APA did, we looked at the ultimate and complete build out of four
square miles around the intersection of Eagle and Overland. I have some handouts here
for you to look at. What we looked at was the complete build out of these four square
miles. Northbound being Franklin on the east side being Cloverdale, south side being
Victory and west side being Locust Grove. We looked at the complete build out by year
2015. Taking into consideration all the development proposals and the spin off I should
say possible spin off of the known development proposals. To come up with the land use
projections we hired Smith and Associates, E.J. Smith. She contacted several of you, I
think she has talked with Councilman Morrow, Councilman Yerrington, and to the Mayor
and also with the City staff Shari Stiles and I don't if she talked to Gary. And also
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 5
consulted the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. She also talked to the developers
and landowners of the area and based on this information she came up with a land use
projection and complete spin off development of the area. Those are on that first table that
you see on the second page. She is going by traffic analysis zones and for each quadrant
given the possible spin off development and the land use proposal if there was any
available. We usually, we use the trip genera Ie which is the standard manual for these
types of studies across the country. We came up with the number of trips that all of these
developments is going to generate. We came up with 257,000 trips per day, that would be
in year 2015, generated by complete build out of that four square miles. The first map that
you see shows you the existing traffic volumes along the area and on 1-84. Then we
entered those into the travel forecasting model that we have. The model takes into
consideration background traffic as well as the site generated traffic. I came up with some
I should say high numbers for Eagle Road, for 1-84, for Overland and Cloverdale. Our
conclusion at this point is that if the area if the roadways in the area is not expanded there
will be severe congestions with these types of developments in that area. As a matter of
fact we ran the intersection analysis, calculated the level of service on major intersections
in that area and they all came level of service F which is not acceptable at all or worse
than that. Again that was given the existing configuration of the intersection and even the
existing capacity without any expansion. ACHD has received this information and it is up
to them to translate these traffic volumes into the capacity that is needed to accommodate
these types of traffic volumes. This study by no means is going to repudiate the studies
that have been done by consultants previously. Again those studies looked at one single
use and we looked at a total build out of four square miles. As a matter of fact I support
the study that has been done by Bell Walker for the power center, I entered the numbers
into the model and I arrived at the same numbers that the consultants came up with. But
it is the nature of the 2 studies that are different. That is why we came up with these high
numbers. Any questions?
Kingsford: Ali, have you looked at a build out, I guess I am thinking about the Town
Square Mall area now, which is build out pretty much four square miles over there. I canJt
think that they generate 200,000 trips.
Bonacta: I wouldn't say that the Boise Square Mall is the developed completely out on four
square miles, I don't think that it is there yet. It is not four square miles and it is not as
densely developed.
Kingsford: I mean the four square mile area around that is pretty much developed out. If
you take, weill guess you could argue that Maple Grove has got some open space. But
certainly from the Town Square Mall and go on to the east there is certainly area that is
developed out much denser than what this will likely be by 2015. With the number of cars
that we have in Ada County I can't believe that they are generating currently 257,000 trip
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 6
days.
Bonacta: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, as you mentioned, there are still a
considerable number of vacant lots around Boise Mall area. If we want to compare with
this situation it would be that all of the area south of the Y intersection would be completely
built out and out on Overland south of the Mall would be built out. These are based on a
complete build out. Meaning that we did not leave one parcel vacant in that area. You are
right it may not happen by year 2015 but this is the for the lack of a better term, the worst
case scenario. That if everything is completely built out by year 2015 that is what is going
to happen.
Kingsford: What is the traffic classification at Town Square, Cole and Franklin?
Bonacta: In terms of level of service, during peak hour level of service F.
Kingsford: I guess to carry and maybe this is barking up the wrong tree, but to carry my
analogy a little further, any four block area in downtown or four square mile area in
downtown Boise that is developed any study's been done to see how much trip generation
they cause?
Bonacta: I haven't looked into that, then again, if we compare with downtown Boise we are
comparing small shops and a mall with the medical facility. Those are not equal, the small
shops generate much fewer traffic. I am talking about the same size than a regional mall.
Kingsford: I guess what I would suggest is that if you only have a certain number of people
you are only going to have a certain number of trip days. I can't believe that four square
miles here are going to generate that many trips unless we have a lot more people. I
recognize that your projections call for the valley to be something in the neighborhood of
what?
Bonacta: 300,000 and some, that is the background traffic and plus site generated traffic.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I want to suggest that quite candidly the power to make these
projections correctly or incorrect is with this Council and future councils. Very candidly
some of the things that we table tonight by virtue of their proposed plans outs would make
the densities of those grounds substantially greater than anything that you are trying to
compare to as we speak here this evening. As you being to look across and consider what
four square miles is, the Highlands Ranch and their desires for PUD and build outs that
I heard this afternoon would be the densities greater than anything that you are comparing
to. So, in this particular study is a worse case scenario this Council and future Councils
have it within their hand to make these numbers either real valid or downsize the densities
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 7
and make the numbers lesser than what they are here. Certainly we are beginning to see
proposals that if they continue as the preliminary proposals are that these numbers will
become valid. So, I understand what you are saying and certainly there is not 250,000
trips in the Town Square area now. But also this area compares on the south side of that
freeway and the Town Square Mall area there is virtually little or no development or it is
very low density when you consider going all the way to Victory Road which is what the
comparison is for this area. So, I can see a scenario with this on the top side and with a
substantially lesser number on the bottom side and it will be up to government as to what
it is going to be. As I read the information that Ali is giving us tonight and in comparison
to a couple of the other issues that we have dealt with.
Kingsford: Of course over at Town Square you wouldn't get to Victory because you are not
going to Franklin because you are starting at Fairview essentially. It should go from
F airview to Overland.
Morrow: In the Town Square you can make a case for Victory because you have access
by virtue of Maple Grove. You are taking Franklin and you are going a mile south of
Franklin which would put you to the south side of Overland and of course the mile west
would put you to Five Mile and you have got a substantial amount of office space between
Franklin and Fairview bounded by Maple Grove and Five Mile that is yet to be developed.
When you go over and look at the old movie houses and movie drive in theaters, there is
15,20 acre parcels associated with those that have yet to be developed. So, the scenario
here is believable as I have read these numbers. It is up to us as to what we want.
Kingsford: I suppose, I just have difficulty believing that four sections are going to develop
257,000 traffic or trips days. If you have 300,000 people in Ada County.
Morrow: If you use high density housing you certainly could get very close to that.
Kingsford: Well, you are going to have more than 300,000 people is what I am saying.
Morrow: It is possible.
Kingsford: Any questions for AIi?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, listening to the conversation I have a kind of agreement with both of
you. I think that I would like for the developers of this area to also in the preliminary think
about alternate transportation facilities. Looking at the power mall, when I was down in
your office it was not very pedestrian friendly I didn't think. J think that is the point that we
should encourage those people to look at alternate transportation in their preliminary
plans. You can go either way here as Walt said, and the Mayor said. I think it is easier to
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 8
do it now than after the fact. So we should encourage them to do that from our stand point.
Thank you.
Kingsford: Any other comments or questions? Thank you AIL
ITEM #6: ORDINANCE #708 - LEEANN LONGSON ANNEXATION/ C-G:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE N. 300
FEET OF THE E. 95 FEET OF LOT 5 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO.2
SECTION 8, T.3N, R.1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have Ordinance #708 read in its
entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move for the adoption of Ordinance #708 with the suspension of
the rules.
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to approve of Ordinance #708 with the
suspension of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM # 7: ORDINANCE #709 - PACKARD SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING
THE NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T.3N, R.1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like
Ordinance #709 read in its entirety? Counselor do you have a copy?
Crookston: (Ordinance Read Aloud See Tape for Discussion)
Kingsford: Is there a motion on the ordinance?
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 9
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of Ordinance #709 with suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #8: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION BY PNE/EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION (TABLED JULY 18,1995):
Kingsford: Does the Council have questions of the developer or his engineer?
Morrow: I have some questions of staff, at our last meeting the proposal was made by the
development team and their representative to talk with reference to the cost of
maintenance for a temporary lift station. The number was bantered about that in Boise
that cost was $4000 approximately per year. Were we able to come up with any
approximate numbers here in terms of what it would cost to maintain a lift station?
Smith: Councilman Morrow, I don't believe that I received any information from the Waste
Water Department on that subject.
Morrow: Okay
Kingsford: Other questions of the Council?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, just for my own edification, I believe that was stated by the developer
that would be paid for by them until it is changed to the other subdivision?
Kingsford: I believe that was by their engineer more precisely is that right?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for Packard
Subdivision by PNE/Edmonds Construction with the following conditions, be subject to
staff conditions, ACHD conditions, a development agreement, a lift station maintenance
agreement, and fencing of the north boundary.
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to approve of the preliminary plat of Packard
Subdivision subject to staff requirements being met, ACHD requirements, a development
agreement being agreed to, lift station agreement and fencing of the north boundary, all
those in favor? Opposed?
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 10
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #9: RESOLUTION #161 - PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION FEES:
Kingsford: We don't have one, did we not get a resolution for the picnic shelter fee?
Crookston: I did not prepare one I did not know that was requested.
Kingsford: Well, who put it on the agenda? I would entertain a motion to table it until the
next meeting.
Yerrington: So moved
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to table the Resolution #161 until the next
meeting, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Crookston: Do you wish to have me prepare that?
Kingsford: It would be hard for us to take a look at that and adopt it if we don't have one.
Is there a motion for the Council to have the Attorney prepare that resolution?
Tolsma: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Bob to have the City Attorney prepare Resolution
#161 Picnic Shelter Reservation Fees, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #10: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT FOR TURTLE CREEK
SUBDIVISION:
Kingsford: Does the Council have any question on that? I don't see Gary Lee, did you all
receive the letter of that request?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move that we grant this request for a one year extension.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 11
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of the request for a year extension
on Turtle Creek final plat, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #11: NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES NO.1:
Kingsford: Does the Council have any question on that? Mr. Smith
Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, I told the developer's representative that I would
be here and I would carry this through for you and answer any questions that you might
have. You have in front of you a copy of the Non-Development Agreement, this is basically
the same language that we have used on Bedford Place and Summerfield NO.2. I have
a little drawing and you can visually see what lots are involved here. The lots that are
shown in the heavy boundary line are those that will be developed. The Non-Development
agreement speaks to those lots that are outside of that heavy boundary line. The reason
that this non-development agreement is so lengthy is because the subdivision is not yet
recorded. When I talked to Wayne about it we felt that it would be better to refer to it by
a meets and bounds description rather than leaving a blank where the recording number
would be. The very last page of your packet has a, is a sheet which if the subdivision was
recorded would be used in lieu of the first two sheets that you have in the agreement that
contains primarily the legal description, meets and bounds legal description, But again
Wayne and I felt that it would be better to refer to this area as meets and bounds and also
reference those lots that would be non-developed.
Kingsford: Any questions of Mr. Smith?
Morrow: I only have one question, with respect to and it appears to me from the street that
Mr. Howell has done everything that he said he would do with respect to the retention
pond.
Smith: Yes
Morrow: You are totally satisfied that everything has been done as you and I had
discussed in terms of solving that problem?
Smith: I believe so Councilman Morrow, he did build a cedar fence along the north, south
and west sides of that pit, the retention pond. I opened the gate one day when I was out
in that area and looked at the pond itself. The side slopes appear to be graded to what
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 12
was required. At the time I was there there was no water in the pit. I haven't been back
to observe it again. I don't think we have received any calls, have we Shari, no.
Kingsford: Well according to them and as well as their engineer, supposedly the only time
there would be any water in there is from street run off which hasn't necessarily occurred.
The problem before had been from irrigation there were some problems before.
Smith: Correct and they have bermed up around it on both the north and south side. I can
see that from inside the enclosure.
Tolsma: We are not going to run into a problem with water and sewer lines (inaudible)
Smith: The water line will come from Locust Grove Road into the Subdivision and it will
dead end at the ends of the stub roads to those lots that won't be developed at this time.
Tolsma: That is not going to affect anybody else on either side of this?
Smith: No, the only other subdivision that this connects to would be the Chateau Meadows
Subdivision along the south boundary. It does have a stub street I think it is called
Laughridge. That would connect Chateau Meadows to this subdivision and at that point
the water line would loop through there. But not until
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Smith: Yes, at that little stub street.
Kingsford: Any other questions for Gary? If it is your desire to approve of that you need
to authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest that non-development
agreement.
Tolsma: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of the Non-Development Agreement
and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: Mr. Mayor, the developer has not yet signed this I did just get this copy of it today,
so I will forward that back to their engineer and have him sign it before it comes back to
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 13
you.
ITEM #12: WATERISEWERlTRASH DELINQUENCIES:
Kingsford: This is to inform you in writing if you choose to you have the right to a pre-
determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. August 1st, 1995 before the Mayor and City Council
to appear in person and be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that
your sewer, water or trash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel. This service will
be discontinued on August 16, 1995 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone
from the public that would like to contest their sewer, water or trash delinquency? Seeing
none I would entertain a motion to approve the turn off list.
Yerrington: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve the turn off list, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City
reviewed by the Fourth Judicial Court pursuant to Idaho Code, even though they appeal
their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list this month is $18,083.08.
ITEM #13: APPROVE BILLS:
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the bills.
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Bob to approve the bills, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #14: DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
Kingsford: Mr. Smith
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, the first item I have to present to you tonight, I don't think
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 14
that you have copies of it, Wayne has a copy of it. It is the latecomers agreement for
Sportsman Pointe Subdivision developer who is the Westpark Company, Inc. This
agreement has been signed by Greg Johnson who is the principal of that company and it
is a latecomers agreement for a sewer line extension and a water line extension to serve
that property. The properties of the Sportsman Pointe Subdivision is not included as a
latecomers recipient in this agreement, but adjacent property which can be served by both
sewer and water is included in the agreement. I don't know if you need any specific
details I can tell you generally that the amount the developer is requesting reimbursement
for is $107,400.11, there is approximately 526 equivalent residential units in that area that
can be served by this extension which consists of 280.7 acres. Excuse me let me back up
that is 1053 equivalent residential units and 280.7 acres. Wayne has drafted this
agreement and has been working with my Assistant Bruce Freckleton in ironing out some
of the details. I think Wayne met with Bruce this afternoon and resolved some minor
Issues.
Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Smith?
Morrow: Tell me how a latecomers agreement works please?
Smith: Certainly, if a development is not adjacent to an existing City sewer or water line
then the developer is required to extend to and through his property. The process of that
extension adjacent property will be served or can be served by that line. A latecomers
agreement is a mechanism that allows the developer who has extended the water or sewer
lines outside of this development to recover some cost of that extension when adjacent
properties develop and connect to these extended lines. We have had a policy in the past
that the developer cannot recover costs of the extension within his own development. (end
of Tape) Basically we look at the area that can be served by the sewer and water line and
the densities developed densities of those areas based on their zoning. Then we break
that down into the number of the equivalent single family residential units, ERU's we call
those. Then each development that comes into us for approval for construction that can
connect to either the sewer or water line is assessed based on the number of equivalent
residential units within that development whether it is residential or commercial or
industrial. We factor it all down to a residential unit. This agreement has a sunset time of
ten years and so it is written for a ten year period. After ten years goes by the agreement
goes away. The developer mayor may not recover all of his costs, whatever happens in
the area as far as development is what he would see as a recoverable cost. The City can
maintain or retain up to 10% of the latecomer fee for administrative cost purposes. And
that is written and agreed upon between the City and Developer and written into this
agreement as to how much the City is going to retain. Typically the latecomer fees that are
collected are then reimbursed to the developer on a monthly or a quarterly basis. So he
gets that money back at those increments over a ten year period of time.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 15
Morrow: So the City collects the money?
Smith: The City collects the money and receives a fee.
Morrow: Who pays the money?
Smith: The initial money?
Morrow: No, who pays, how do we collect the money?
Smith: We collect the money at the time the building permit is taken out.
Morrow: So the builder mayor may not know when he picks up his building permit that
there is an additional assessment charge?
Smith: That is correct.
Morrow: Which would be typical of things within the industry?
Smith: Yes sir, it happens quite often.
Morrow: So then we collect the money, the builder at point of building permit pays the
money which is over and above what he would pay for his building permit impact fee and
various other permits?
Smith: Correct
Morrow: Is there an escalator in terms of interest with respect to this?
Smith: Yes there is, on October the 1 st which is the beginning of our fiscal year the
latecomer fee amount is increased by whatever the prime rate is at a bank that is
referenced in the agreement.
Morrow: My point here is very candidly that there is tremendous misunderstanding with
respect to the golf course and how those things are collected. The issue is that late
comers are identical with what is going on at the golf course. So, I am after that
explanation so that it is clear in everybody's mind that in terms of latecomer fees that we
are doing exactly the same thing as what it is the City is doing at the golf course. The
methodology of collection is the same, the interest upgrade is the same and so that is what
I am after here. Thanks for the explanation.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 16
Corrie: Mr. Mayor I also think I also know what you are after Mr. Morrow, but I would like
to tell you that water and sewer is required by law, golf courses are not. Thank you.
Kingsford: Entertain a motion on the latecomers agreement and authorize the Mayor to
sign and the clerk to attest.
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to approve of the latecomers agreement
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: You have something to say on this issue, on the latecomers agreement for this
particular issue?
Donahue: My name is Bob Donahue, most of you know me. Is there a thing drawn up that
the attorney here can draw up an item on this here so if that subdivision owner can't
rebuild on that land without excluding the fee. Do you get what I am after? He can form
another company and go ahead with that subdivision and be scott free and still get the
revenue off of the sewers.
Kingsford: What he has done is already expended money for those sewer and water lines.
Donahue: You don't get my point. A lot of these contracts and I have been in the
contracting business a long time, what they do is they change hats and they come in with
a different company and their name is not even in on it. I have $100,000 in bankruptcies
with these jokers like that. I believe that the City lawyer should draw up an exclusion the
fact that he or his family are in the building business and goes into that lot again under a
different name or an assumed name, they do assume names, that he would be not titled
to anymore of the money of the revenue from what he is asking.
Morrow: I am sorry I don't understand.
Kingsford: I am not following, you see what has happened here Mr. Donahue is that I think
I get where you are going but that is not where we are at with this agreement. What
happens here is this developer puts in sewer and water lines to and through his
subdivision that are oversized, we have required them to be oversized so that other people
could hook to them.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 17
Donahue: He don't get nothing from that right?
Kingsford: Right, he will get money then the differential between what his development
will use in that sewer and water line and what that cost him to extend that through his
property that other people might benefit from.
Donahue: Yes, but will he benefit from it again and double dip?
Kingsford: Oh no
Donahue: You are sure?
Kingsford: Yes, our engineer has already calculated exactly how much capacity he will
be using out of his lines that he has built and can only get back the differential that over
and above and it also then has a ten year sunset so it can't go beyond that. He cannot get
more back than what he put in over and above his development.
Donahue: I wish it to be stated in the minutes then that I object to it becuase it is not
written right. I would like a lawyer to take a good look at it that he would be not getting
double duty for what he did. Him or his family.
Kingsford: So noticed. It was moved and seconded, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Mr. Smith
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, the second item that I have is a change order request for the
boiler installation and digester number 1 rehab at the Waste Water Plant. I will give you
a copy of the request. I guess I already did that. This change order request consists of
I guess there are three different parts, one is an addition of a combustion air damper and
duct work for the boiler. The second item was a new gas line inside the digestor which
was not discovered until after the digester cover was removed and the inside was
inspected. The third item is to reinforce the digestor thrust ring which is at the base of the
steel digestor cover. And again we weren't able to see that until the cover was removed
and was inspected. The item number 1, the combustion air dampers and duct work that
was not included on the drawing as bid and it was discovered after the contractor was
selected and the work was started. Typically my attitude from past years of consulting
work is that when an item is not included on the drawings for a project but is found to be
required after the fact that it is included as part of the project cost because my feeling is
if it had been on the drawings the contractor would have bid it to be installed. The one
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 18
issue that does come to mind though is that on change orders typically you pay a premium
for the work that is to be done under a change order. I can't say that for certainty but I
think that is typical for the construction industry. Out of the $9,469, $5,390 was for the
combustion air dampener and duct work.
Kingsford: Is it your recommendation to approve the change order?
Smith: Yes
Crookston: Gary, on your comment about the additional cost at a premium, to do this work
doesn't it have to be done at the same time that they are doing the work already?
Smith: Yes
Crookston: So, even if it cost a little more in regards to this particular contract it would be
more expensive to have somebody else come back and do it and reopen the job would it
not?
Smith: Most probably yes.
Crookston: I guess the best way to explain it, it is hard to stir what is in the pot until you
take the top off, the lid off the pot.
Smith: I would agree to that statement yes.
Crookston: Had it been included in the initial bid it may have been, this addition may have
been able to have been done cheaper? But to go back and re-bid it and have this
contractor that is doing the work now do the work that was in the initial bid and have
someone else come back a month from now and do it you are talking about doing many
of the things all over again.
Smith: Yes, very possibly, I don't know what all is involved to install these dampers and
duct work but as cramped as everything is in that digestor building that is very true. Of
course as you mentioned the cost of this would have been less had it been bid. We have
got, our consulting engineer has looked at this, at all of these items to determine the
appropriateness of the cost. He has recommended onto me that this is a reasonable
number.
Kingsford: I think counselor your discussion there just supports what Gary is talking about
that they usually are. Particularly bidders (inaudible) get a chance to make some of that
up. Is there a motion to approve the change order.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 19
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the change order request for the
boiler and digestor number 1 rehab and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, all
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: I noticed one typo in there Gary, item 2 there, "replace existing gas line wich".
I am trying to sharpen up my skills, school starts up pretty quick. Anything else Gary?
Smith: I will mention it for your information only, I received a phone call from the owner of
Elite Cleaners this morning. The lady, Arlene I think her name is, is concerned about
having some striping painted for parking spaces along East Second Street to delineate the
spaces because she is having a parking problem. I guess there are quite a few people
that work at the telemarketing business and she can't get parking spaces for her patrons.
And is asking the City of Meridian to paint some diagonal striping delineating the parking
spaces so that when people are parking along East Second they are at least parking in
some kind of a reasonable spacing. She had been in contact with Ada County Highway
District and they said that it is now their policy to have individual cities paint parking space
striping, that they will not do that.
Morrow: On a City street they won't do that?
Smith: That is what she told me.
Morrow: When did that policy come about?
Smith: I don't know.
Kingsford: Would you look into that Mr. Morrow in the event that is true the have also said
that signage was one of their least priorities. In the event that is true we may want to work
that into our budget becuase we are going to have to re-stripe the Masonic Lodge in the
next year's budget as well and that is just across the street.
Morrow: That is on private ground.
Kingsford: Correct, what I am saying if we can't get it done otherwise we want to go ahead
and stripe it.
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 20
Gordon: Mr. Mayor, two years ago we ran into the same problem and we did paint those
diagonal lines in front of Sheila Kildow's establishment and also on Idaho Street which is
now in front of the police department becuase ACHD would not paint parking lines. So it
has been their policy for the last two years to my knowledge. We painted them the last
time and they are worn out again.
Morrow: Does Boise City have a painting department that paints their parking stalls on all
of their city streets?
Kingsford: You are going to look into that Mr. Morrow.
Morrow: I thought maybe I would get a cheap answer here and not have to work so hard.
Gordon: I have no idea, we did pay for the striping the last time.
Morrow: I will research it.
Kingsford: What is interesting about that is I am sure we can be held for any damage
we've done and so forth. It is their streets.
Morrow: I suppose we even have to have a permit.
Kingsford: That wouldn't surprise me either. It still fires me up that we have to have a
permit to cut the streets, another taxing agency is not right to the taxing public that you
have to pay for cutting, a permit from ACHD for us to cut streets to work on our lines. But
I have gone a round on that one so many times. After the first of the year somebody else
can go around on it. Anything else Mr. Smith?
Smith: No, thank you Mr. Mayor and Council.
Kingsford: Chief?
Gordon: Nothing your honor.
Kingsford: Shari
Stiles: Nothing
Kingsford: Counselor?
Crookston: Are we going to have executive session?
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 21
Kingsford: We need to have executive session on a pending piece of litigation. I would
entertain a motion to go into executive session to discuss that issue.
Tolsma: So moved
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Walt to go into executive session to discuss pending
litigation, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Kingsford: (Inaudible) attorney pending litigation, entertain a motion at this time with
regard to litigation filed against the Highway District, City of Meridian.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we instruct our City Attorney to notify ACHD that we
do expect to be defended and indemnified by ACHD as that suit works its way through and
to also keep us as a named party in the suit fully informed as that suit progresses.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to have the City Attorney inform the Highway
District that we expect them to defend and fully indemnify the City and to keep them
apprised of the activities of the suit as it works through the process, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Mr. Smith, you had one other thing you wished to bring before the Council.
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, I am sorry I forgot about it on my initial go around. We have
got some engineering work that needs to be done at the Waste Water Plant and I have a
proposal from Keller Associates and that is engineering firm that has been working on our
filter addition and the ultra violet treatment addition that we recently did. I will pass this
attachment out so that you can review it and see what I am talking about. The title of this
proposal is a clarifier/headworks improvements. On the last page of that handout is a
table that shows the projected cost summary for five different phases of the project. What
I am in talking to the engineer I was concerned about the fee for the design portion. He
made the suggestion that we go ahead with the predesign portion to better define the
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 22
scope for the design section. Right now they are assuming some things to come up with
that design fee. So the predesign phase is what I wanted to talk to you about tonight and
that is what I have handed out a copy of the parts of the predesign phase that would be
involved in arriving at what would need to be designed to upgrade the plant. This upgrade
is what we are working towards as far as capacity of the plant is concerned of 4 million
gallons per day on an average and 5 million gallons per day peak. All of these items tasks
one through 8 well actually task one through seven are improvements that we need to
make to increase the capacity of the plant. The amount on that is as shown on that table,
I think it was item A, $14,510.
Yerrington: How long would it take them Gary to complete this work roughly?
Smith: Well, they didn't say Max, I am not sure. We are looking at 128 hours of engineer
time, 24 hours of structural, some of those happen concurrently.
Kingsford: I guess what Max may be after is what I am after, are we looking at having this
anywhere near done so we can look at in the budget?
Smith: Yes, we were trying, we are trying to get the engineering done so that when we go
into the budget year next year we will have the engineering done and we can start project
work. We start the budget year off with projects other than engineering. I think timing
wise it will be good becuase we are in the time of year when contractors historically are
not as busy in construction.
Kingsford: I would entertain a motion then to approve of Forsgren or pardon me Keller
Associates for predesign.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve of the $14,510 to Keller and Associates
for predesign work for the clarifier/headworks improvements at the Meridian Waste Water
Treatment Plant.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of Keller and Associates for the
clarifier/headworks improvements in the amount of $14,510 for pre-engineering, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Did you think of anything else Chief?
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 23
Gordon: No sir.
Kingsford: Mr. Crookston, anything else?
Crookston: No
Kingsford: Walt?
Morrow: Schedule for budget workshops?
Kingsford: Will is out this week and I haven't got that. I think we are looking at beginning
next week and the following week.
Morrow: Tentative time, August is a big month.
Kingsford: I guess as soon as Will is back next Monday if you guys would get with him as
to your druthers, I can make myself available.
Morrow: Could we maybe kind of pick something now becuase if he is back Monday we
got to meet sometime next week. We are not going to have a lot of notice.
Yerrington: We are going to be Wednesday and Thursday Grant.
(Discussion Inaudible)
Morrow: P & Z meets in here on Tuesday and you guys are gone Wednesday and
Thursday, so Monday night it is.
Kingsford: Will won't be back to put anything together for Monday so I think you are
looking at Friday.
Corrie: I won't be here Friday, Saturday or Sunday.
Kingsford: We are looking at the 14th.
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: He will be home on the 7th but we won't have any information put together for
us to work from.
(Inaudible)
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 24
Kingsford: They have P & Z in here and Max and I will be gone that afternoon or evening.
Let's look at the 14th, that is a Monday.
Morrow: I have to represent us at ACHD at 5:30 usually 5:30 to 7:30. Now if you want to
set a time for a workshop to start at say 7:00 then I will make sure that I am out early.
Kingsford: Does that meet with your guys approval, would you just as soon meet in the
evening or afternoons, what is your pleasure? Let's look at that for 7:00 then on the 14th.
And then schedule additional as needed off of that meeting. Anything else Walt?
Morrow: No sir that is it thanks.
Kingsford: Max
Yerrington: Nothing
Kingsford: Bob
Corrie: Barbecue Friday night, Salmon Barbecue, everybody is welcome.
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: Mayor's invitational is Friday, go play golf all day and go eat the salmon which
is excellent and I will do a wedding in between. Also on Saturday the luau, I would
encourage you to think about that. The first one was last and it was excellent. Not as well
attended as it ought to be for as nice as it was. It has been kind of a follow up, dance luau
thing. At the Centennial ball it was thought that we ought to get together more than once
every 100 years and after some discussion and nobody else put anything forward Jennifer
at the golf course did and it is kind of a marvelous event. We had people from Seattle to
Twin Falls at that festivity and it well received. There was one neighbor that thought the
music was a little loud, we will be a little further out there so maybe he won't be as
offended. Anything else Max oh that was Bob excuse me. Ron?
Tolsma: Nothing
Kingsford: I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Yerrington: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Meridian City Council
August 1, 1995
Page 25
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:17 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
9 5 O~~'LJ
~.... ""
f'~ '''.: ',~ L ~ '_/.~ ,; \ U !_ n.
: ;\ \: . ~ ,~'.; ,~. ~r.r":
OJ. ,"" (T~ .. 1....-' . I . \ 1 ; ~ I , , ~ ...,J
ORDINANCE NO. 707
BOiSE if)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ..z.oN~W~ ,'GER,+,~~1jJ~'l en
REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND E6CA.TEe tIN' THE'..) )
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOl~HIP 3 NOR~H, ~fi~/~
RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA DcrtNTY:, .-:eDAHO: '1"<:;';0,7--
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. \t. \Jf~"-';i:;.g "_',c_L.:>1 ,
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Ci ty
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1.
That the real property described as:
A parcel of land located in the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1
West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County.,
Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Corrunencing at a brass cap marking the southeast corner of
Section 13, T.3N., R.IW., B.M., thence N 89046'23" W
along the south line of said Section 13, 1309044 feet to
the Southeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said
Section 13, the Real Point of Beginning of this
description;
Thence continuing along said south line N 89046'23" W
799.58 feet to a point;
Thence N 0031'11" E 19.24 feet to a point;
Thence N 1003'11" E 340.95 feet to a point;
Thence N 0013'37" W 229.32 feet to a point;
Thence N 0038'59" E 228.87 feet to a point;
Thence N 1019'50" W 21. 81 feet to a point;
Thence N 0031'11" E 292.20 feet to a point on the
southerly right-of-way of r-84;
Thence S 89033'35" E along said southerly right-of-way
385.48 feet to a point;
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - MOORE/C-G
Page 1
Thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way S
85044'44" E 419.99 feet to a point;
Thence S Q046'49tr W 1101.44 feet to the Real Point of
Beginning of this description;
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridianf and shall be zoned C-G
General Retail and Service Commercial; that the annexation and
zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on
the request for annexation and zoning.
Section 2.
That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer at its expense and resolve how
the water and sewer mains will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4f 1994.
c. Thatf as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 Land 11-2-417 D prior to the
issuance of any building permit or plat approval which
ever comes first; that the development agreement shall
address inclusion into the subdivision of the
requirements of 11-9-605 C, G.f H 2f Kf Lf and M of the
Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and other matters; that the property may be de-annexed if
the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement are
not satisfied.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirementsf 11-9-605 M.
which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways,
and 11-9-606 B 14. which pertains to pressurized
irrigation.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the Applicant, the titled ownersf and their assigns.
f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of
the City of Meridianf which include that the property
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - MOORE/C-G
Page 2
must be developed as a planned commercial unit
development or under the conditional use permit process.
Section 3.
That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
1st
day of
August, 1995.
ATTEST:
,,\11111111111/111 APPROVED:
,,\\~ Of MEtrt//IIIt'
"" ~, "-"La /~
~ ()~ apOp.. -l~ 'l
~ cpt. ''''I)"; ~
.:::- ~'$; ~:o ~
F ~ %
~" &i~r?~
-;. ~ ()j':: ---
~"'7.... v.sr 1si . '\ .p $ MAYOR -- GRANT P. KI ORD
'l '"'A ........__ t.. ~
.... ~1 C ~\ ,"
....I; 'OUNT'<. ",\
IIII( \\\\\
11{1I111111\\1\
.Jit&~ptJ~ U_
WILLIAM G. . BERG, .ii:.. z2.. - ~ITY CLERK
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - MOORE/C-G
Page 3
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. 707,
by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 1st
day of August, 1995, as the same appears in my office.
day of August, 1995.
/!. ~
City Clerk,
Ada County,
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
On this 7th day of August, 1995, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM
G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official_. s.eal the day and year in this certificate first above
written:'~\::'" .."mtu".
, ,.' L ",
. ,.... r r,:: r> c#
...' \ 'V - ',~ ""..
.... -, .J';~.-::';:q-:l~ .,./] ..
" ,""'" :r-;:<'" ....:",.. ~J0 ()
~ ~ '-:'.."'-,. v~~
........... J.,,<", V --;.
::: J (\ l' t!\ If) I ~\. p
.... ~\"..J -1 '" '... ~
~ {5. ..',. .... '?: ....
..... \~ 1'"
- .- -:;. ~.,.
= (~F~- ~~I.:~
:. * Q; II . \ '.,0 ,;""(::
.... ~ l.:p;.~....~ rl .,.
~ ~b .... .~;? ~ ~
.. .$" 'lte ~..' "t"~ ..
"'of ~A ~~fl-ry"". 1'.,,\~"- ~,..
~, fr<;J >.t- 1';.,,"'-,., ~"r-,", ........
~~ .f t o~ ~;';' "
-I1:;"'.;I!~ s la"''-
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - MOORE/C-G
SEAL
ot ry Public for Idaho
iding at Meridian, Idaho
Commission Expires ~g-O~~~1
page 4
/I"
-:=\
\j.)
I") ':J
"'\
>- iO
n ..
. ~
.... ~
'lit
\
J>J V\
:> m
':)
~ n
..
~
y.)
\ --- - .- - ..---:::;::::;
~-------
\
\
\
,
,
\
\
,
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
\
\
I
\
I
I
,
I
I
1
I
I
\
I
I
1
\
I
\
I
\
I
\
I
,
I
I
\
\
,
I
1
\
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
\
....... 'Of6\
~1'entnl~ - - ~
~-----'-
---
---
i
\
I
\
\
1
I
\
I
,
I
\
I
1
I
\
\
\
I
I
1
,
I
I
\
I
\
\
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
I
1
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
1
I
I
I
\
I
,
\
\
\
I
I
\
I
,
I
I
\
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
\
I
i
I
I
I,
I
..
I
I '\
I I
I \
" I
, I
\ \
I
I
I
,
I
I
1
\
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
\
I
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
I
I
\
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~..dt 1fJill/f
f/. ~11 97' '\
No /)~/3' $1~W'
"22-t:f. 5Z
J rf<J.t,{{ue.
('( ~.?p1
fr. {tJ (QI1Jf'W,
1.1. "iJ1 \)\
~
~
.A /..Jet. /10.101
p,zt:JI/'IP'P / C-ff
W,/I, M(/)tz1f
I
I
I
\
I
~ \
I
~ \
~\
~\
I
~i
:e\
I
,
{
oC4f,' tJ/f" W.lftJ!, 44
I
, ,
I ' I
I ' I
I I I \
\ , I, ,
, \ t \
I \ \ \
I \ I ,
I 1\ I I I
f l' \ , \
f r I I \ \
II \ I I \
'I I \ I I
f I \' I I
1: \ \ \ ~,\
J f \ \ \ 1'1\1\
: / \ \
I I' I \ I \\ \
/ f \' \, 1\\ \
f I '\ \ \ \
/ I \ I ,,\ \
/ I ,I \' \ \
/ \' I' \
/ t I I \ \ ,\
"/ I I I \ \\
// \ \ I I \ \
" ,I \\ \\
// \\ II ,\
/1 // ,\ \ \ \\
1/11 II II "
f/ \ \ \ \ \\
/iI 1;'11/_----- ',\ \ \ \\
Illl' / ".....-----:::......... \ \ I I \ \
11 !l1/ -.<.....~ \, \, \\
I I I: {I "'" '~~ \ \ \, \ \
I 'f I '...... I \ I \ \
, I. I .. '.. ',' I I ' ... \
\ \' I ..... \ \ \ \ '\
,\ I \ \. \ \ \ \\
I~\ \'1 II ,\
\ I, \ \ \ \ , \ \
\ \" I I " \ \
\ \ '\ '~"" \ \, \ \ '\ \
\ \ ......... '...... \ , \ , \ \.
\, ............... \ \ \ \ ..-J ...-------.
I \ .............. ......_ I I ~-\-------
~ ' "'... _____---.--+-r: ..----
--j '-.--::::::: _------1".1--~-----i '1Z
t'"-~ ,\1\ lie
....... t I \ \ I ' I
...\ \ ,\ I I
\, \', II It
~ , I I \ ' I .
" ~ ' ' \, f I
... ...~ \ I ,\ . I
", " I \ · I
" "
ll'-,O' ~:;::2l'[;
J ~ 0 u J 0
Ldf' ~~~
. ~, -, g ,,' ", , ,- ~
/'. · ., :<'_ :_' _ ;'. ~ G' f{ :,1 t ~\
\; ~ ~) /~ / i ~'} ~ ~i\ ~/,' I F~ i -~ ~J
ORDINANCE NO. 708
BOiSt: ~J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX~ ~D1Z0N~WP1~~~AIN
REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION ~Ffl(rHff- N. 1310CY- 'FEET OF
THE E. 95 FEET OF LOT 5 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO.2,
r~"
SECTION 8, T. 3 N., R. IE., B. M. ADA COUNTY, IDAH0:f"~ANl)""PRQYID:ll\JG~:AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. nEC:;'>5:"~ i.,-,~
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said ci ty real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Ci ty
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1.
That the real property described as:
The North 300.00 feet of the East 95.00 feet of Lot 5 of
Pleasant Valley Subdivision, according to the Official
Plat thereof filed in Book 12 of Plats on page 665 in the
Office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the 1/4 corner common to Sections 5 and 8,
T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho;
thence South 88055'00" West, 774.09 feet along the
section line between Sections 5 and 8 to a point;
thence South 00034'09" East, 25.00 feet along the
Northerly prolongation of the Easterly line of said Lot
5 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 5;
thence South 00034'09" East, 300.01 feet along the East
line of said Lot 5 to a point;
thence South 88055'00" West, 95.00 feet to a point;
thence North 00034'09" West, 300.01 feet along a line
parallel with the East line of said Lot 5 go a point on
the North line of said Lot 5;
thence continuing North 00034'0911 West, 25.00 feet to the
section line common to Sections 5 and 8;
thence North 88055'00" East, 95.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - LONGSON/C-G
Page 1
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned C-G
General Retail and Service Commercial; that the annexation and
zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on
the request for annexation and zoning.
Section 2.
That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer at her expense and resolve how
the water and sewer mains will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 Land 11-2-417 D prior to the
issuance of any building permit or plat approval which
ever comes first; that the development agreement shall
address inclusion into the subdivision of the
requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L, and M of the
Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and other matters; that the property may be de-annexed if
the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement are
not satisfied.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M.
which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways,
and 11-9-606 B 14. which pertains to pressurized
irrigation.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian, which include that the property
must be developed as a commercial planned Unit
Development.
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - LONGSON/C-G
Page 2
section 3.
That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this
1st
day of
August, 1995.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
~
~~~&'-~,~ .
WILLIAM G. BERG, J~ - CITY CLERK
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - LONGSON/C-G
Page 3
STATE OF IDAHO,)
.
.
ss.
County of Ada, )
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE N. 300 FEET OF THE
E. 95 FEET OF LOT 5 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO.2, SECTION
8, T.3 N., R.1E., B.M. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. 708, by the City
Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 1st day of
August, 1995, as the same appears in my office.
day of August, 1995.
-
-
...
....
STATE OF IDAHO,)
S5.
County of Ada, )
On this 7rh day of August, 1995, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM
G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written.
SEAL
~,~y~~~r
" "",SilHf"",
, ..,,, r E L. G "<,_
......~)" \ v .-,;;C~~'::<lc:., "'<1 /".-
~ ~ "..r:J;'J ~.~l.-+'A fr,~l,,'.~
:::...., I () or l\ t'" .' :.
:: 'D \\...,.t~'''.l...r' -:.
:: 8 . . ~
~ r. ~~" "C,' .;
:. 'fs: r,. ;0 U p ~ \,4 .~. .' ~
~\}J~:'::e~~~~:?~"<~.;:~/~
I' A;....,-... ","ti'..{-'" "if
J..,~ t- ~ 11 ~ ~~-.~R ~ \"\.
111.'1' ,'1;I~t ,;..\.\
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - LONGSON/C-G
Page 4:
{bINt OF f!E4/NNIN:1
1/ ~tOlZ.N"1Z-1 <<c-.
.' -I -
____u__ _____ __ -UU-r;--- u-u;j?-.-'tJS-7;5J{;(J"f!1,;n4-,- oq 1- - --- - -- -- - U __u____
_t=lIJBYIE\N. ..AVENUE._ __ ,.
i
Ii i ~i___~
- -'
_-r=- -.- .-~ -~. ._..-~ -'. ,.-
r' - _.~ --1'4'" -~ - -- ----:;:,.-.~.--- : i~' -- : I
.. 1
I,
t:-:/
,SUB61VISION
III /ill
------------~------- --- -----~
,n
u -1 - T=-
#&k
----j
j
. 1"-::::
~C!-S,
I
VALLEY
'.... l--. /
"'>'>',. " ca~, " -;' /
'. , '..' ~ ...----::::f- - .'
, ........-'
"..........-...........
- -
S'!B IIii!IiI ISIiI
-
--
I
I
I
~
tJPtJIN).Nd NO. 70S
toN.~M c.--4
"A.f' i
I
TREAS
I I
~ !-.-----
'A"::- ~'88i:l55'co"(#. qG,Oo'
Ilgrl:;: N,I~tl. 5{i'OC/' C. 1'j,bO'
.( e,f1 ~ .(3"IO"~, 'dq 1113, 2'5. c0 '
I I I
II O,e:; N'lOo 3tf-1oq' W, 2/5. cp
I
I
I
2
~
-I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I.
=---=--=:~,- ~~....:...~
".,
-.....-...
------ .--- -1--~:" /'
I \\(/
\' 1 1\
, t i\
I \ i\
_.____________ l .----__1~~!
-.' ,u___ -- -1--------- '. \
-,,' I \ \
I \ '
, \
I
Cl C I' !.. i' ( !, 0
~ ~~(khJ
. _,: ~ .. H ""in)
I ;~~/" ~_ ~..... V~T, ~."c,;,U~_i',
ORDINANCE NO. 709
j. t: ~~~ \-' ; ~-: :" : I i
~"", /"\
. ~ ~ i
BO~SE 1:3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTA~N
REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF ~RU~~i~GfWHE~~NW3
1/4 SE 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T.3N., R.1E., B.M. ADA C6UNT~~ID~O; AN ~d~L)
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Fl: _1()ldIL~. ,~. ... .:- . -..,. (, ~
R,.,,{'. , ", "_51"
1..... \!....-. 0,1 - -'. .
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Ci ty
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1.
That the real property described as:
A parcel of land being the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 of section 5,
T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 5, a
point marked by a brass cap; thence along the North-South
center of section line of said Section 5
North 0027'15" East 1312.52 feet to the Southwest corner
of the said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, THE POINT OF BEGINNING~
thence continuing
North 0027'15" East 1312.52 feet to the Northwest corner
of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, marked by a 5/8n iron pin;
thence along the North line of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
South 89040'20" East 1324.78 feet to the Northeast corner
of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, marked by a 5/8" iron pin;
thence along the East line of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
South 0030'47" West 1310.88 feet to the Southeast corner
of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, marked by a 5/8" iron pin;
thence along the South line of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
North 89044'36" West 1323.43 feet to THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and lS zoned R-4
Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the
conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - PACKARD
Page 1
Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for
annexation and zoning.
Section 2.
That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant is required to connect to the Meridian
water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains
will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 Land 11-2-417 D; that the
development agreement shall address the subdivision of
the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L, and M of
the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian and other matters.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605
M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. The requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the
City of Meridian.
Section 3.
That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above
conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which
conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to
the owner and Applicant.
Section 4.
That the City Clerk shall cause one (l) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - PACKARD
Page 2
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Amended
Ordinance.
Section 5.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 1stday of August, 1995.
\ \ \ \ \ \II \III 'Ii",
\\\ f aCt:,.., III
,\\ ~l 0 M'-<i/^ I,,,
" A." Iv.~ /"
,'~" .- ~ 'l
~'~. .r. ~:i\""POR""'r..J/ - . ~ 'l
g .;;.c,o 7'<-'0 %
~ ~ ~
:: QT;'l ~ L ::
~ ~;l!.1 PoL :;:
; y ~ ~
:: ~ ,/;):::
~ '- Qv ,., 0 ...
~ 1:~'.1 ~~r 15\. \ ~~.$
~ 71 "'--..-.-........ ^~f\ .......::-
""I', 00 " ,( \v ".;;:.
~'I. .lUdT ' \\\
I'n, ,\\\
~t;rt~. "I\l\~
APPROVED:
~~~
OR -- GRANT P.' ~RD
ATTEST:
.Jk~xfz.6h'J, (J.
WILLIAM G. BERG, J~ ~ CITY
CLERK
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a
true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING THE NW 1/4 SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 5, T.3N., R.IE., B.M. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.", passed as Ordinance No. 709 , by the City
Council \.p.n~~tt~i1b'IiII of the City of Meridian, on the 1 st day of
Augus~'\~~5.~1tID4'~ same appears in my office.
~.::- c> Of\POTtq ~1- 'l~
f ~G B'AJD)hiS 7th day Of, August, 1995.,
:: SEAL~ ~ ~
::..." f'J::: .'It ~~ ~
- r. 0 - , ~
% --; ~t:s. ..~ o! ' F Co#- -:l (
-;... q,0..!.2~{f ..$' City Clerk, City of M€rHiian
1',...,(... \V," d
'-"';/1 aUNTi, \\", A a County, Idaho
II, \11
1i'/llrll11;\\\\
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - PACKARD
page 3
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada,
On this 7 th day of August, 1995, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public In and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written.
SEAL
",nuu""
,.... r:: L 'I;
.... r ~ . G 'I>
.... \.J ,,~~ /1....
...... ~,.a;;~-vQ~ ,,-,,,
~ ~ ff;i- ~..f.l.'"l. ~1- oIl'".
$ '\/"' ""~\I 1'..Jr:, ~
... q ['. -') ~
'lo:o-"'" . "'~ j. t'-~ rr ~ "," ......
= ~ ;:,.,"_i Y'9:'
_ (~I 'I:~ I:I=a
- r;-. ,.,.. f) ~ Oto
.". J,..,o- J.....~ lj. j 0 r..j' 1'1:>
~ ~ (~1 J.~I ~ of T'! ~ \"....,,;.. CI:t
-:. ~". t~~ l3.) ~ /~) ~
~ Ll.:'1,. t'=f} 0, ~
or,"", (.. .~~~, ...rt~) ~~
"r 9..;; .$"0 ';;""l.::t~.,.,.~~::;&.", '#. ,,~~ ...
""; ~;t """.,i'U~ 1: .,,,,, -If;,
'4 .fJ 1'0: 0- Wt ..~
I/.J.I Ili:. r \t\"~
IIIULUIIIL
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - PACKARD
Page 4
, .
pt\All\PllT .u
(/' ) ..-, ",
v -< eULv~)e..<={ {) - 7 . Cj S-
0'-.1
Vi." 1
(\./. i. Eli "')
/J, ',,'- ~:, ((b
l:: _i_}r/\,. ..' //.'-cf~ Y / ". f
I.,) \.c-p" l._'~.V-~L v {.'r;.
~ !
Map 3
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES (TAZ)
of Land Use Study Area
t
N
Fr anklin
SLRMC 162
<J.)
:> Q)
0 284 p-mo(
ro
h "'d
0 H
~ Overland Q)
rn :>
~ 0
Q..) ,..-t
C) F"""'4 U
0 286 b.() 285
~ ce
~
Victory
Table 4
TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION
TAZ Section land Use Acres SQF GFA Trip
(000) Generation
162 NE SF,Rl, Edoeview 79 3,441,240 2,580.93 754
162 NE SF,R8 25 1,089,000 816.75 1,910
162 NE MF,R3 25 1,089,000 816.75 716
162 NE Free Standina Retail 16 696,960 174.24 7,086
162 NE Office 10 435,600 108.90 1,494
162 NE Canal, etc. 5 217,800 NA NA
162 NW SF,R1, Montview Park 30 1,306,800 980.10 287
162 NW SF, R3 20 871,200 653.40 573
162 NW St. Luke's Hospital 40 1,742,400 475.20 7,974
162 NW NursinQ Home,300 bed 5 217,800 54.45 780
162 NW Office 40 1,742,400 435.60 1,613
162 NW General Retail 21 914,760 228.69 9,301
162 NW Canal, etc. 4 174,240 NA NA
162 SUBTOTAL 320 13,939,200 7,325 32.488
284 SW SF,Rl 40 1,742,400 1,306.80 382
284 SW Park and Ride 2 87,120 82.76 1,726
284 SW Power Center 73 3,179,880 714.40 24,885
284 SW Flood Plain 45 1,960,200 NA NA
284 SE SF,Rl 80 3,484,800 2,613.60 764
284 SE SF,R3 44 1,916,640 1,437.48 1,261
284 SE Retail 15 653,400 163.35 6,643
284 SE Canal, 1-84 Hwy 21 914,760 NA NA
284 SUBTOTAL 320 13,939,200 6,318 35,661
283 NE SF,Rl 135 5,880,600 4,410.45 1,289
283 NE SF,Rl 10 435,600 326.70 96
283 NE Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4,429
283 NE Office 5 217,800 54.45 886
283 NW SF,Rl 38 1,655,280 1,241.46 363
283 NW SF,R3 100 4,356,000 3,267.00 2,865
283 NW Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4,429
283 NW Flood Plain, ete 12 522,720 NA NA
283 SW SF,R3 78 3,397,680 2,548.26 2,235
283 SW Industrial Park 15 653,400 163.35 1 , 139
283 SW Golf IRecreation 15 653,400 653.40 125
283 SW Retail 24 ',045,440 . 261.36 10,630
283 SW Office 12 522,720 130.68 1,718
283 SW 1-84 R-O-W 16 696,960 NA NA
283 SE SF,Rl 35 1,524,600 1,143.45 334
283 SE SF,Rl 10 435,600 326.70 96
283 SE Retail 34 1,481,040 370.26 15,058
283 SE Office 10 435,600 108.90 1,497
283 SE Light Industrial 4 174,240 43.56 304
283 SE 1-84 R-O- W 67 2,918,520 NA NA
283 SUBTOTAL 640 27,878,400 15,268 47,493
. Table~. Continued
TAZ Section land Use Acres SQF GFA Trip
lOOm Generation
286 NE Retail 114 4,965,840 1 ,241 .46 50,490
286 NE SF,R3 33 1 ,437,480 1,078.11 945
286 NE Ucht Industrial 13 566,280 141.57 987
286 NW SF,R1 39 1,698,840 1,274.13 372
286 NW SF,R3 97 4,225,320 3,168.99 2,779
286 NW School Site 15 653,400 653.40 7,004
286 NW Retail 5 217,800 54.45 2,21 4
286 NW Canal, etc. 4 174,240 NA NA
286 SW SF,R3 145 6,316,200 4,737.15 4,1 54
286 SW Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4,429
286 SW Canal, ete 5 217,800 NA NA
286 SE SF,R3 117 5,096,520 3,822.39 3,352
286 SE Office 30 1,306,800 326.70 3,434
286 SE Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4,429
286 SE Canal, etc. 3 130,680 NA NA
286 SUBTOTAL 640 27,878.400 16,716 84,589
285 NE SF,R1 69 3,005,640 2.254.23 659
285 NE SF, R2 65 2,831,400 2,123.55 1,242
285 NE Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4,429
285 NE Flood Plain, Canal 16 696,960 NA NA
285 NW SF,R3 60 2,613,600 1,960.20 1,719
285 NW Retail 65 2,831,400 707.85 28,788
285 NW Office 27 1,176,120 294.03 3,171
285 NW Flood Plain 8 348,480 NA NA
285 SW SF,R2 122 5,314,320 3,985.74 2,330
285 SW Retail 15 653,400 163.35 6,643
285 SW Office 15 653,400 1 63.35 2,033
285 SW Canal, etc. 8 348,480 NA NA
285 Sf SF,R1 54 2.352,240 1,764.18 516
285 SE SF,R1 93 4,051,080 3,038.31 888
285 SE Retail 10 435,600 108.90 4.429
285 SE Canal, etc. 3 130,680 NA NA
285 SUBTOTAL 640 27,878.400 16.673 56,847
GRAND ToTAL 2560 ., 1,513,600 62,300 257.078
ABIpnIrip.o.1<3
L'l ~ \~ \ l
;:)HW ;:) L\.1d
~ 0 0 0 0 $
~\:<;~}'Zl <;,f:\ 'vl 110'l' f:6Z'Zl t91'Ol 1..1.. 17' I..
'$ il'
~
~
!-<
Cl
<.
~
~ 'lIi'
0
cD co ?
0"$ g:l
4. \ co 0" <.
~ ~O .....
t..-l ~
~ .... are-p.1ab-OlJ
.....
-
4. 0 0 .
0 <;VV'<;'
tOO' 01 n<;'1.. 09f:' 9
~
~ P rod
~ Q ~
~ . ,-4 00 ~
,.-I r.J'l ~
t:-' ~ o. 0
~ 0 ~
rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o
N \1"'14-
\..0 Q) co C) ..r
~ (""';) co N
~ ...-10 ~ . ,...4 N
~ 0 1.0. t;> ?
0 ...-I ~ t-. 0
~ f.fl t'-
--- -- o. 00
t:' $ . ~6Z'Z\ .
~ <;,<a'Z'tZ rrz'vZ Q6t'<;' tt<a'Z
4- ..0 81 '83-
-.,./ ~ .??
0
~
U N r- t- .l"""I
0"$ o. 8
....- .... N
~ 0 0 N
.... o. <t
t;M o~.
4- (""';)
~ 1.0
c-
~ al\.O.l~ 1sn~O
~
r-t cO t'-
~ ~.
.<f. U""<Il \ \1"'1
~ co I""""" U"" ['-4
\0 t-
N
\0 ~
....
~ )91 '3-
V
$ N
< 0/..9'<;1 (%~ 'I g.$ \1"'I~(<jo
c& \ ~co 0" 0" Cf"I 0'
r'1-ew~ ~ Cf"I 0" Cf"I 0-
~ ..-4. ...-c -"'" ....
. .. " (
~ .
if'1
~
o
~
r
u
~ OOl'o\:
~
o
~
~
~
$
3
o
~
U
r-I
~
~
~
r
\0
~
o
N
\.0
~
cO
$
~\
:)\1W :)t\.1A
l
\
\
000'9\:
\
~
~
~
,.
"
~
~
002'21'
009' r v
--
~
cD
\
,.......,-I
\ \ _\
o
o
0" ~
~ ~
o
~
o \,)
o .,...,t
r'?~ ';?
0"
~
1
o
o
r-~
0"
~
o
o
O"~
N
~
\
d \"\31>.1 d 1\.01.:)
00<;'<;2 009'91
\
-
006'ca1
,....-
oat' 61
.-0
o ~
~ ~
~ .........
~ ~
Cl.)
o ?"
~ 0
o
("'":l
~
. ,.....t
e
<t
o
o
\{"l
c:x:l
N
o
o
~~
..0
N
-
o
.,...,t
71
p
~ 0
~ 0
~ \{"l~
\{"l
~
00<;'1"2 OOO'~Z
01
o
N
\{"l
~
00Z'9<;
--
o 0
o
o
~
..0
N
o
o
o~ 0 0
("'":l00
N..oO"
~ ~
0"-
("'j\{"l
\
o
o
1.0
~
("'":l
c:x:l
\
....
-
o
N
::a
~
4.
C)l\.OJ.-n )Sn::>O
~
cO
\
~
1Sl ''3.
~
\
c::?:
~
Table 5
2015 Traffic Volume Projectios (Constrained)
location
Roadway
Eagle Rd.
Victory - Overland (south 1/2)
. ..
..' , .
vrctory- Overland (north 1121
Overland - 1-84 (south)
1-84 (south). St. Lukes
St. Lukes - Franklin
. ,-. ."... ".
.. .
Franklin -Faifview
Cloverdale Rd. Victory~ Overland (south 1/21
Victory - Overland (north 1/21
Overland - 1-84
I~B4~ Franklin
Franklin. Fairview
Five Mile
.. " ..
., '" .
ViCtory-Overland (southJ/21
Victory - Overland (north 1/2)
n_ c..__.__ ....... . _ . ...
. , . -' .
. c. . ., ,.
Overland..I~84 (southl......i ....
I-B4 (north) - Franklin
Franklin ';Fairview
Victory Rd. locust Grove - Eagle (west 1/2)
Locust Grove - Eagle {east: 1/2l
Eagle - Cloverdale (west 1/2)
.' . ' .
Eagle - Cloverdale (eastl/2t
Cloverdale - Rve Mile
. ".. -. , ..
Overland Rd. Locust Grove.. Eagle (west 1/2l
Locust Grove. Eagle (east 1/2)
Eagle - Power' Mall
Power Mall - Cloverdale
Cloverdale - Ave Mile
1-84 Meridian IC - Eagle IC
Eagle Ie -Five Mile IC ..
Franklin Rd. Locust Grove - Eagle (west 1/2)
Locust Grove - Eagle {east 1/2}
Eagle - Cloverdale (west 1/2)
Eagle - Cfoverdale (east 1/2)
Cloverdale - Rve Mile
NB
13,100
.11,8()O
29,BOO
...2ttsob
20,400
. ,.',., ... .__. '_"'_'C
.. ". ., d. ....,,, .d.. .
... .. ....20,:iOQ
8,400
.12,~()6 .
9,100
9,7Q()
B,800
18,3()0
22,300
<., <. .. c' <.',.,'_.
.... ,. ,..,.
...> .......2 H1.()() ...
19,000
.21,900
~lfu>2Ol~.wk3
SB
9,900
12,700
26,400
. 23,100
19,200
18,900
8,200
1 2,700
9,800
9,700
8.200
..17,700
21,500
21,100.
17,200
20,100
EB
6,500
7,900
8,100
9,000
8,800
B~OOO
15,000
14,900
11,800
21 ,400
43,400
63,600
11,200
10,500
8,000
11, 900
10,600
WB
7,700
7,300
11 ,200
11,900
10JOO
9AOO.
11 ,400
15,600 ·
12,800
21,500
40,200
62,800
11 ,800
9,900
7,500
9,BOO
9,100
Total ADT vie Ratio I
23,000 1.53
.24,500 1.63
56,200 1.66
.-,' '." ,.
..$J,90(j. 1.53
39,600 1.17
. ..--,,' .- -..
39,1 ()()>. 1.15
1.6,600 1.11
..i??,500. ..1.7
18,900 1.24
19,40{). ~ 1.26
17,000 1.11
36,000 1.06
43,800 1.29
4.2,299 1.24
36.200 1.07
42,000 1.24
14,200 1.29
1$,200. L38
19,300 1.38
~0.9()0 lA9
19,500 1.39
........P.40(} 1.16
26.400 1.76
>30,50t>< 2..03
24,600 1.64
.42,9001.27
83,600 .96/.89
126.400 1.41/1.39
23.000 1.44
20,400 1.28
15,500 0.97
21,700 1.35
19,700 1.31
r.o Q) 0 j' 8 -1 ['5"-
<- ~(8:"Q}JV~I\ 0 . - - fl
;O.f \0 . (\ J}Y -I--
):./J~() P CfMvV \ €eAM(f
.
~
'll!,)
:>
t
" Ql 0
+-
\A
:lI
U
.3
.
'Z
'2.
@ @ e @@
0-
@
@l
@
l=r~~==~~@ ~~==~~ e
.@
@
Lot A v-ea. 40 be
De.velo eel.
~I CHAMBERLIN ESTA TES I~
DELINQUENCY FOR AUGUST
TURNOFF SCHEDULED FOR 08/16/95
Kingsford: This is to infonn you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to
a pre-detennination hearing at 7:30 P.M. 08/01/95 before the Mayor and
City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made
by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel.
This service will be discontinued on 8/16/95, unless payment is received in full.
Is there anyone present who wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash
delinquency? No response.
Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of
the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code.
Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list
is $18,083.08
DELINQUENCY LIST
TURN OFF LIST SCHEDULED FOR 08/16/95
ACCOUNT #
NAME & ADDRESS
AMT.PASTDUE
1----30 JOHN R. BEAUDOIN 61.80
713 l\1ERIDIAN ST.
1---170 HOWARD 1. BOYLE 456.20
721 W. 3RD ST
1---930 MICHAEL STILES 43.30
223 W. BROADWAY AVE
1--1040 JOE & H. AZEVEDO 58.60
110 W. RAILROAD AVE
1--1240 TECO INVESTlMENfS 44.00
801 W. 2ND
1--2010 RICK S. WISDOM 64.80
323 W. IDAHO AVE
1--2040 DOUGLAS SEAMONS 44.00
203 W. IDAHO A VB
1--3200 MARY ANN NEWKIRK 47.00
847 W. PINE A VB
2---180 RHONDA DUNN 72.80
921 W. 3RD ST
2---402 ANDREW & D. LUBACKY 59.00
912 NW 7TH A VB
2---466 WILLIAM VICK 88.40
673 W. APPLEGATE ST
2---486 THOMAS FISCHER 96.40
676 W. APPLEGATE ST
2---526 DAVID L. MOSSI 90.54
1032 W. 8TH
2---650 AUSTIN L. YOUNG 61.30
906 W. 10TH ST
2---680 AUSTIN L. YOUNG 82.40
918 W. 10TH ST
2--1050 BILL GRAU 135.00
820 N. LINDER RD.
2--1160 DION STATES 79.00
37 W. CHERRY AVE
2--1250 ELIZABETH WEAKLEY 60.20
1528 W. 1ST ST.
2--1530 JAIME OBENCHAIN 78.40
1320 W. 2ND ST
2--1570 MICHAEL LOCK 93.20
141OW.2ND
2--1610 DENICE DESILET 79.20
1502 W. 2ND
2--1730 DR. BARRY SAMS 91.00
403 W. CHERRY LN.
2--1870 LARRY PIPER 55.20
306 W. MAPLE AVE.
2--1970 KERRY L. LARSON 84.10
225 W. MAPLE
2--1990 RICHARD NEWBERRY 60.20
1337 W. 2ND
2--2030 VIRGINIA MEYER 44.00
230 CAMELLIA
2--2280 RICHARD SCHERER 83.60
201 CHERRY AVE
2--2530 LARRY K. MEEK 86.80
1432 W. 4TH ST
2--2631 MIDTOWN SQ.HOME ASSOC. 116.00
SPRINK./MIDTOWN SQ.
2--3440 ROBERT FLElYfING 51.10
525W. WASHINGTON AVE
2--3600 WilLIAM HUTCHINGS 76.00
309 W. WASHINGTON AVE
2--3712 CLYDE E. BRINEGAR 76.00
1625 :tvffiRIDIAN ST
2--3952 GARY GRIFFIN 75.40
1023 MERIDIAN ST
2--4520 PATRICIA R. WILLIAMS 68.20
1409 W. 13TH ST
2--4710 DEANNA ROSE 108.20
1316W.14THST
2--4740 JUDY ALBRECHT 129.00
1406 W 14TH ST
2--5130 RUSSELL SMITH 98.40
1433 W. 14TH ST
2--5160 JACK WARD 44.00
1407 W. 14TH ST
2--5170 Jll..L RODRIGUEZ 68.70
1401 W 14TH ST
2--5650 KENNETH WEATHERS 67.20
1527 W. WASHINGTON ST
2--5670 JAMES R. RANSOM 78.40
1017W.15THAVE
2--5890 KAY FElL 56.00
1036 W. 15TH AVE
2--6100 MARIE R. JACOBS 57.60
1114 W. 12TH AVE
2--6440 FREDRICK J. SHADDICK 124.20
1002 W. WASHINGTON DR
2--6660 SUSAN DAVIS 51.60
1101 W. 11TH ST
3 ----10 MIKE ENGLISH 124.80
770 N. ABERNATHY WY
3----50 SHARON LYON 65.50
721 N. ABERNATHYWY
3----54 RICK FISHER 101.20
705 N. ABERNATHY WY
3---308 lMICHAEL BITTNER 62.20
2065 W. SNYDER DR
3---344 L. DEAN & R. GOODNER 65.00
731 N. ROTAN AVE
3---420 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 63.80
674N. TALLPINEPL.
3---426 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 54.00
742 N. TALL PINE PL.
3---670 WAYNE MURRAY 90.92
1625 W. PINE AVE
4--1412 RODNEY PLUMLEY 57.20
2826 W. LEONARD CT
4--1754 MARK PRYOR 94.00
2553 W. SHERYL ST
4--2020 HEPPER HOrvrnS 67.00
2226 W. SUNNY SLOPE DR
4--2132 DOUGLAS WALSTON 92.40
2015 W. SANTA CLARA DR
4--2200 JOHN BLA YE 101.40
1702 W. SANTA CLARA DR
4--2302 MARK A PLOUGH 81.00
1915 W. CHERRY LN.
5---158 BRYAN MCCARTY 91.80
3964 W. ASPEN CREEK CT
5---168 JACK & C. LAPWYK 63.60
3953 W. PARK CREEK DR
5---358 WILLIAM G. KEN GEL CONST. 129.80
4215 W. BLUE CREEK DR.
19---40 LINDA WARD 52.60
3807 HARBOR POINT DR
20-1618 JON & C. W AGNILD 44.00
1740 INTERLACHEN WY
20-1782 ERIC ROSSMAN 87.90
3820 W. WOODMONT DR
20-1846 MICKEY L. WARE 108.60
3721 SEA ISLAND CT
20-1874 PAM WALKER 84.40
2024 INTERLACHEN WY
20-1880 JON D. ROHOLT 114.20
2050 INTERLACHEN WY
21----4 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 116.80
1632 TODDWAY
21--506 KELLY SAUREY 97.20
2846 N. QUARRYSTONE WY
21-1018 KENT BARNEY 89.20
2782 N. FIELDSTONE WY
21-1172 RICHARD FALK 63.60
2375 LEANNWAY
21-1176 MICHAEL ARl\.1STRONG 116.60
2510W. CHATEAU DR
21-1590 DAVID WHITTEN 80AO
2151 TODD WAY
21-1754 KEVIN W. BINGHAM 90.40
1851 KRISTEN WAY
21-1766 RICK K. COFFMAN 89.00
1960 MARIANNA PL.
21-1776 EARL FOREMAN 77.60
1920 TODD WAY
21-1820 MARK DAVIS 65.50
2001 TODD WAY
21-1894 CLINTON BARNHART 98.20
2580 MISTY DRIVE
21-2006 MARK & T. ROSE 69.60
1732 N. MORELLO AVE
21~2060 MICHAEL D. MACHOS 124.20
1679N. VICTOR AVE
21-2260 MATTHEW & S. BREWSTER 101.40
1893 N. SW AINSON AVE
21-2768 GLENN JOHNSON HO[\1ES 65.00
2566 N. VICTOR WAY
21-2918 DAVID & K. REYES 78.80
2953 W. ELK STREAM ST
21-3120 ROBERT MCCORMICK 98.80
2974 N. HEARTH AVE
22--304 STEVEN C. WESTON 76.80
1650 W. CHATEAU DR.
22--312 STEVEN M. CANTRELL 99.40
1750 W. CHATEAU DR
22-1032 REN THOMPSON 152.30
2039 N. NYBORG WY
22-1150 GARY HARRISON 99.80
2365 W. RAINWATER CT
22-13 56 MARVIN L. KERBS 175.90
1983 HENDRICKS CT
22-13 82 MARK & C. WILCOX 126.40
2028 MONACO WAY
22-1412 MARTIN DUARTE 69.80
1803 W. MCGLINCHEY ST.
22-1420 DUANE DAVENPORT 61.20
1719 W. MCGLINCHEY ST
22-1482 LYLE D. ANDERSON 102.60
1723 SANDALWOOD DR
22-1500 JULIA JILL METZ 81.80
1718 W.SANDALWOOD DR
22-1504 RANDY L. STh1PSON 86.40
1764 SANDALWOOD DR
22-1520 MICHAEL A. RUFFALO 176.20
1952 SANDAL WOOD DR
22-1524 CARL L. KOCH 81.30
1994 SANDALWOOD DR
22-1596 PAUL GIAUQUE 102.40
1767 BEARD ON CT
22-1600 DAVID H. REEDER 54.60
1707 BEARDON CT
22-1602 ALL YN HILTON 81.40
1687 BEARD ON CT
22-1634 EVA LOUISE REED 53.60
2291 N. LINDER RD
31--140 NICHOLAS CORRAL 65.70
1300 W. YOST CT
31--150 VICKI HIGGINSON-MORRISON 48.00
1379 W. RADIAL CT
31--478 ED HIRAHARA 261.00
1532 SANDALWOOD DR
31--608 MICHAEL WALKER 136.60
1333 NEWPORT DR
3 1--726 JASON & L. NlTZ 61.60
1324 NEWPORT DR
31--834 TED DUMONT, JR. 89.60
2219 NW 12TH ST
31--840 GERALD R. BARNOWSKI 130.20
1312 TANA DR.
31--866 VICKEE K. LARSON-POOLE 84.80
1328 W. CHATEAU A VB
31-1002 COE KIEBERT 88.60
1571 CLAIRE ST.
31-1004 ROBERT BEHNER 147.60
1531 CLAIRE ST
31-1028 NANCY LOGUE 82.20
1341 DARRAH DR
31-2218 JOYCE GASKELL 97.00
2664 NW 13TH ST
31-2238 MARK TUBBS 92.40
1310 DARRAH DR
31-2300 DOUGLASS.HALLOCK 91.80
1532 LOWRY ST
31-2322 BRADLEY PRICE 124.60
1462 CLAIRE ST
31-3002 DAVE CHRISTENSEN 118.60
2240 NW 15TH ST
31-3016 HARRY DAVIS 66.12
2217NW 14TH ST
31-3032 KENT BARNEY 72.80
1321 W. CHATEAU AVE
31-3050 DEBRA FRENCH 82.00
1065 W. CHATEAU DR
31-3058 DOROTHY L. HARBOUR 105.20
940W. CHATEAU DR
31-3074 PHILLIP PRICE 87.00
1086 W. CHATEAU DR
31-3242 DAVID E. MCGOWAN 108,60
2211 NW 11 TII ST
31-3368 DONNA GARDNER 51.40
933 W. CHATEAU DR
31-3394 PHILIP R. CARROLL 82.40
1080 DELMAR DR
31-3560 DONALD FICKES 134.60
1016 STOREY AVE
32--270 CHURCH OF GOD 48.50
1824 W. 3RD ST
32--320 CHURCH OF GOD/7TH DAY 226.00
1827 W 3RD
32--446 WILLIAM. A CAVINESS 82.90
2054 NW 8TH ST
32--508 BRIGITTE STONE 107.00
626 MCGLINCHEY
32--522 STEVEN HAVEN 92.20
1843 LAWNDALE DR
32--672 DOUGLAS & K. MCVEY 61.70
331 CRANMER DR
32-1284 EDWARD WILLERT 44.30
428 W. WOODBURY DR
32-1298 MICHELLE FLORENCE 82.80
419 W. WOODBURY DR
32-1648 ROBERT &J. GREEN 70.30
451 W. W ATERBUR Y DR
33-4344 :MARK CIRELLI 82.50
2557 N. LARCHMONT AVE
34--632 JA1v1ES & S. BAKER 65.60
1419 E. TOURMALINE ST
34--914 DONALD AMYX 94.40
1281 E. HUNTER DR
34-1036 RONALD & M. LANDON 107.40
1288 E. HUNTER DR
34-1772 DON HOPPER 89.20
951 E. CHATEAU DR
34-1806 ERJMINE DAVIS 109.40
1014 CLAYBOURNE DR
34-1976 MARJO LACROIX 94.20
1028 CLARENE ST
34-2104 HEIDI TYLER 51.90
1034 TAMMY ST
34-2802 BRETT & M. DUNST AN 77.80
1316 E. RINGNECK CT
42--346 AARON & K. JONES 78.35
2392 E. APRICOT DR
42-1966 CLAY A. BARRY 108.60
1960 E. :MEADOW WOOD ST
42-1986 HERRELL D. AKERS 62.00
2225 N. MEADOWROSE PL
42-2038 COMFORT ZONE HO:MES 44.00
2305 E. CHATEAU DR
42-2252 BRAD L. MCKINLEY 102.60
2220 E. CHATEAU DR
42-2404 PHOEBE ROSE 61.30
2277 N. LOCHNESS WY
42-2496 LESLIE SIEMON 108.20
1961 E. GLENLOCH ST
42-2530 KELLY & T. KILER 81.40
2031 E. LOCHMEADOW CT
42-2582 LORRI CHAPMAN 102.65
2542 N. :MEADOWGLEN PL
46--326 CASEY MCDONOUGH 50.00
3582 E. EISENHOWER DR
49--901 FREDRICK BAGLEY 59.00
SPRINK-AUTO CNCPT
50---12 PAUL H. SI\1ITH 46.90
29E. STATE AVE
50---90 ROBERT HENDRY 68.60
515 E. STATE AVE
50--210 MIKE CLAUNCH 92.00
338E. STATEAVE-#l
50--262 SCOTT MURRI 51.90
12 E. STATE ST
50-1380 GARY TillSON 63.90
1302 E. 1 ST ST
50-1706 STEVE ffiJNT 95.20
16 E. WASHINGTON AVE
50-2378 DARLENE & R. GUTHMilLER 76.80
1290 E. DRUCKER ST
50-2444 STEVE & T. MCNITT 53.00
1472 N. PENRlTHAVE
50-4028 KENNETH BLOTTEAUX 39.90
1092 N. STONEHENGE WY
50-4478 MICHAEL R. COLEMAN 55.20
532 E. PINE A VB
50-4534 BERT LEE 74.40
909 E. 4TH ST
50-4578 RONALD & 1. LARSEN 67.40
214 E. PINE AVE
50-4598 RAY ATKINSON 367.80
124 E. PINE A VB
51--338 AUDIO ELECTRONICS 61.20
242 E. BROADWAY AVE
51--454 R. B. NIELSEN 116.00
725 E. 2ND ST
51--486 KATHERINE KEELE 111.10
325 E. IDAHO AVE
51-3198 STEVEN RYKER 38.60
216 E. 3RD ST
51-3234 GARY R. KNOX 50.00
205 E. 2ND ST
51-3300 DAVID ROBERTS 53.00
133 E. KING ST
51-3320 TIMOTHY P. ZIM:MER 120.20
234 E. 2ND 8T
69---46 DAVID WILLIAMS 138.80
1877 S. GOLDSMlTH A VB
69--530 DEBBIE & MARK BROWN 112.80
1053 E. PEACOCK ST
69--654 EDENBROOK, INe. 56.00
1320 E. PUFFIN ST
69-1524 RON LAFEVER 326.60
737 E. LINKERSHIl\1 DR
69-1590 M. PAUL & J. JONES 329.20
1706 SE 3RD WAY
69-2298 SCOTT JOHNSON CONST. 145.00
1895 S. MARSHWOOD PL.
74---18 ALFRED & J. HOCKLEY 51.90
43 SW7THAVE
74--338 RODERICK S. YEAGER. 67.80
685 HANOVER CT
74--344 SIDRLEY HOOK 81.40
635 HANOVER CT
74--350 GARY E. FRANK 127.90
638 HANOVER CT
74--426 GLORIA LACY 50.00
623 BARRETT 8T
74--670 LESLIE MAY 49.90
654 BARRETT S1
74-1014 JERALD HOLLOWAY 76.80
64 ROSE CIRCLE
74-1260 ROBERT & E. MAYFIELD 77.80
305 S. MERIDIAN ST.
74-1316 NORMAN FULLER 43.00
417 S. I\1ERIDIAN ST.
74-2338 ROB PUCKETT 91. 00
184 L YNWOOD CL.
74-2524 THOMAS LOVELL 92.80
1353 W. KIMRA ST
74-2638 CARMEN BIRD 119.80
447 S. OUTFIELD WY
74-2832 KEVIN MOONEY 71.90
1319 W. CRESTWOOD DR
74-2834 MICHAEL MCCORMICK 100.60
1289 W. CRESTWOOD DR
74-2876 TRACY USSERY 87.60
1345 W. lVfERGANSER DR
74-3076 FRANK & N. STOPPELLO 46.00
1038 W. LOON ST
74-3084 GARY PRICE 71.20
1112 W. LOON ST
74-3248 RICHARD & K. GARNER 98.40
495 S. PELICAN WAY
74-3300 DONALD L. MOORE 61.20
1244 W. GREENHEAD DR
TOTAL A1\10UNT DUE: $18,083.08
TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCTS: . 201
"-