Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWells Street Subdivision AZ 06-017 Denial BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL CIC 06-06-06 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXA nON AND ZONING OF 11.79 ACRES TO R-15 FOR WELLS STREET SUBDIVISION APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL Case No. AZ 06-017 C2B DEVELOPMENTS The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on November 22,2005, at the hour of7:00 o'clock p.m., Anna Canning, City Planning and Zoning Administrator for the Planning and Zoning Department, Dave McKinnon, Conger Management Group, C2B Developments, appeared and testified, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearings scheduled for June 6,2006, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred (300') feet of the external boundaries ofthe property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearings and with the notice of public hearings having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL WELLS STREET SUBDIVISION; CASE NO. AZ-06-017 p&nr. 1 ()J; d and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council on June 6, 2006, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions provided services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code ~~67-6509 and 67-6511, and ~~11-5A-5 and ll-5A-6, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Title 11, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted August 6,2002, Resolution No. 02-382, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 11.79 acres in size and is generally located West of Eagle Road, North ofInterstate 1-84/ 675 and 715 Wells Street, Meridian, Idaho, within a portion of the SW y,; of the NE y,; of Section 17, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 5. Bonnie Robinson, 675 Wells Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Dave Pearcy, 715 Wells Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642, are the current property owners. 6. Applicant is C2B Developments, 405 S. 8th Street, Suite 290, Boise, Idaho 83702. 7. The subject property is currently zoned RUT (Ada County). FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL WELLS STREET SUBDIVISION; CASE NO. AZ-06-0 17 PAnT:: ') "" II 8. The Applicant requests the property be zoned R-15 (High Density Residential). The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 9. The entire parcel of property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following mmmer: Medium Density Residential 11. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map designates the subject property as Medium Density Residential. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has discretionary authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code ~50-222. The Municipal Code of the City of Meridian SI1-5B-3 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The provisions of Idaho Code ~50-222 govern the conditions upon which the City may exercise its authority to annex territory, but the exercise of that authority is discretionary as determined by the City Council. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby order and this does order: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL WELLS STREET SUBDIVISION; CASE NO. AZ-06-0 17 Pdnl'01.nRA That the application for annexation and zoning is denied for the following reasons: The proposed development is not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. By action ofthe City Council at its regular meeting held on the 27~y of cT~ ,2006. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN SHAUN WARDLE VOTED ~ VOTED ~ VOTED ~ VOTED ~ COUNCILMAN JOE BORTON COUNCILMAN CHARLIE ROUNTREE COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) VOTED - DATED: 6-Z7-tPb MOTION: APPROVED: X DISAPPROVED: \\\I\il1ilTlI \\\\ """ III ,\\\~.J elf M'c;;"0 I " ,,("'\ / .::-........0' -" ~ ......... ! J:- ~ d"iJt ;f:"ar~ / /Jr~I/>.te-i- J!jL.4~t~0~~~~~:L,# p) CITY CLERK '///0///"" Gr., ._ -7';[ -{)'t',.......;-:..:c: 1/1 ~'\..FiUN, , ' \\" /1/1111111111\\\\\\\ ATTEST: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. By: (\hCLI) (Y)~,-te~ City Clerk's Office Dated: oLe - L Cj Lip FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL WELLS STREET SUBDIVISION; CASE NO. AZ-06-0 17 P II nr. ~ (II' ~