The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC - Landscape Plan i TREE MITIGATION REPORT NOTES a �_ I III I W III 0. I III " I 3 III Date of Assessment:02/14/2023 a I III W W III I (t) I III III I � Assessment completed by: Kyle Yorita,City Arborist I a N III Regarding:4853 N.Chumney Peak Ave. Meridian,ID.83646 --J 25 I I III 6' I X III a Notes of Assessment: a I III I III I L0 ••• Several trees On site will not require mitigation for the following reasons: PIRR—PIRRT—PIRR— —PIRR —PTW IRR PIRR—PIRR—PIRR _IR1Z PIRR— IRR— --PIS- — .94 mil*{ P- If I II I vi I W III I O Trees are in poor health due to existing twine and/or fabric this is girdling the trees I I III X III •• Severe pest and/or disease infestation �� \ / •• Species is considered undesirable and does not require mitigation II \ / a I III �, X III I O 0o \ / I N I W III I • 23 Total Trees are called out on the plan.12 Trees require mitigation.8 Trees are to be retained.*3 Trees are 20 9 \ / I III >1 III I N O_ considered undesirable species. Please see accompanying map. 20 0 20 I a I III I I III I > O • Mitigation required for trees to be removed=3"DBH I III O ` TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RETAINED HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1»=20 \\1 \ I III W L III I # Common Name Botanical Name DBH(In) Health Mitigation Required? \ I III � W III I 0 N 1 Pine Pinus ponderosa 18 Good Retained No I III I III I 4-- 2 Cherry Prunus sp. 8 Good Retained No X 3 Blue Spruce Picea pungens 8 Good Removed Yes I II I I 3 III I 6 W J 4 Poplar Populus 28 Good Removed *No m m a I III W 5 Poplar Po ulus 24 Good Removed *No I II I I W O p p �--�+ III I � o � 6 Poplar Populus 24 Good Removed *No III 7 White Ash Fraxinus americana 8 Good Removed Yes a I III W 3 III 8 White Ash Fraxinus americana 10 Good Removed Yes I JII I \� I III W III I 0 —co _ 9 White Ash Fraxinus americana 10 Good Removed Yes m m — — — — — — I II I CD N I I III I W 000 10 White Ash Fraxinus americana 10 Good Removed Yes W O a I II W III 11 White Ash Fraxinus americana 8 Good Removed Yes I III I III I I III I U)LL 22 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Good Retained No -71 R a a N a — cf) 13 Crabapple Malus s 6 Good Removed Yes / I II I 14 Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 12 Good Removed YesLO 11 W 15 Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 7 Good Removed Yes a rti y 3 III I C O 00 16 Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 14 Good Removed Yes II I I III I III I O LC) O 17 Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 14 Good Removed Yes I a I III I I I III I U LO N m � III 18 Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 12 Good Removed Yes I II I N 19 Blue Spruce Picea pungens 14 Good Retained No m I III ' X W III I O� � 20 Blue Spruce Picea pungens 12 Good Retained No � III 21 Blue Spruce Picea pungens 16 Good Retained No EXISTING HOME, TO REMAIN a I III N I III I _z 22 Blue Spruce Picea pungens 12 Good Retained No I I III III I ~2 23 Chokecherry Prunus virginiana 16 Good Retained No a I III I III I �J �� SUMMARY OF REPLACEMENT TREES I I I I \ i III X rn Le 0. # Common Name Bontanical Name DBH (in) Width Height N 24 Chokecherry Prunus virginiana 2" MCAL B&B 25' 30' m \ / �� V) 25 Chokecherry Prunus virginiana 2" MCAL B&B 25' 30' 4\S a 00 CUMULATIVE INCHES �+ m ITIGATION NOTES # OF TREES Cn X (DBH) po0 Ia EALTHY TREES 4" OR GREATER REQUIRING REMOVAL 12 119 _/00 \ / \ Al EALTHY TREES ON SITE TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED 8 116 TI • a - — • �� NDESIRABLE TREES ON SITE TO BE REMOVED 3 76 / 112 �`� �,ss EOP — EO OP E0P— E — EO —EDP OP EOP/ OTAL CALIPER (IN) OF MITIGATION REQUIRED 3 \ � — — — — — — _ — _ OTAL CALIPER (IN) PROVIDED ON PLAN 2 4 _ _ a EEP EEP— EEP EP P� E EEP - - EEP I III S$f SS - $$ $$- - $$ SS-(L $$ $$- - - SS SS N \ 03 \ 1 I v E -SS �-SS EX-SS- EX-SS EX-SS�U-S —EX-SS EX-SS E%} S—EX-SS \ J 10 = NO MITIGATION REQUIRED DUE TO UNDESIRED/WEED SPECIES,OR TREES IN POOR 0. \\ \\AAA HEALTH DUE TO PESTS, DISEASE,AND/OR GIRDLING CAUSED BY WEED FABRIC/TWINE / •.� I �/ ' \ I mm', y� EEP—gyp EEP P F .-O EEP EP P P EP P P \ • Pond S ton( / W N W _W W WSW— W 'W - - — SS EX-SS—EX-SS—EX-SSEX-S TREE PRESERVATION NOTES \J _ _ EX- EX- — • \\\ ^l 1. Site plans.Site plans shall make all feasible attempts to maintain existing trees four-inc caliper or greater within 0 their design. 00 — \�1 a 2. Landscape plan.All existing trees greater than four-inch caliper shall be shown on the landscape plan.Indicate /� — _ - U° 25 ce whether each tree is to be retained or removed. Include on the plan a description of how existing trees to be retained are to I a be protected during construction. 3. Protection during construction. Existing trees that are retained shall be protected from damage to bark,branches, and roots during construction.The City of Meridian parks department arborist shall approve the protection fence(s)prior to I W a construction.Any severely damaged tree shall be replaced in accord with subsection C5 of this Section. M 4. Construction within the drip line of existing trees.Construction,excavation,or fill occurring within the drip line of 00 I W o. any existing tree shall be avoided,except to supplement existing trees with new irrigation.Specific requirements for M m I / construction within the drip line of existing trees are as follows: W , [v 4.1 Paving.Whenever possible,impervious paving surfaces shall remain outside of the drip line of existing trees.When it is Cn 03 not possible,impervious surfaces shall be allowed at a distance from the trunk of a retained tree equal to the diameter of I the tree trunk plus five(5)feet. Cb W / I �_ 4.2 Grade changes.Grade changes greater than six(6)inches are prohibited within the drip line of existing trees. CD W/ I a \ Compaction.A fence or barrier that encloses the entire area beneath the tree canopy shall be in place prior to L Ld construction. 00 Q 4.3 Utilities.New underground utilities to be placed within the drip line of existing trees shall be installed in accord with U1 Cn IW a subsection Q0 WO m C/0 III 5. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with TI equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees,five(5)four-inch caliper trees,or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total I W calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space,and when used as focal elements in landscape design. W No mitigation is required in the following: /1. Existing prohibited trees within the property boundary of the project; m� I I a / 2. Existing dead,dying,or hazardous trees certified prior to removal by the City of Meridian Parks Department m / Arborist; / _J EEP EEP FL 3. Trees that are required to be removed by another governmental agency having jurisdiction over the project. 6. Required landscaping. Existing trees that are retained or relocated on site may count toward the required landscaping. Existing trees twelve-inch caliper or greater that are verified healthy by the City Arborist or a certified arborist ( _ a and located within common open space or as focal elements within the site may count equally towards the mitigation of — — — — — — — calipers lost from other removed trees. Mitigation trees are in addition to all other landscaping required by this Article. PIRRPIRR—PIRR—PIRRPIRRPIRR—PIRR—PIRRPIRRPIRR—PIRR PIRR—PIRRPIRR—PIRR—PIRR—PIRR 7. Incentives.The director may allow a reduction up to ten(10)percent of the required parking spaces to accommodate existing trees through the alternative compliance process in accord with Chapter 5,"Administration",of this — — — — — — —Title.Approval of an alternative compliance application for a reduction in required parking shall be obtained prior to — — — — — — — —_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U submittal of plans. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 LLJ � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — .� 0 EXISTING TREE PROTECTION ZONE — — — — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N w 1. Existing trees that are retained shall be protected from damage to bark,branches,and roots during construction. �j � protection fences around existing trees are required for the duration of construction. -d33 d33 d33 —d33—d33 d33 d33 —d33—d33 d33 d33 —d33—d33 d33 d33 —d33—d33 d33 d33 —d33 —d33 —d33 d33 d33 —d33 —d33 d33 d33 d33 —d33 d33 d33 —d33 d33 —d33 d33 d33 d33 d33 2. Construction within the dripline of existing trees are as fallows: 2.1. Paving:impervious surfaces may be allowed at a distance from the trunk of a retained tree equal to the diameter Typical g 50-Foot Local Street Section Setback/ZoningTable Land Use Calculations Underground UtilityNote of the tree trunk plus five feet. m 2 2.2. Grade changes:grade changes are discouraged within the dripline of existing trees and are subject to DESCRIPTION AREA (ACRES) PERCENTAGE V) recommendation by the city forester or an approved arborist. 2.3. Utilities:new underground utilities to be placed within the dripline of existing trees are subject as per subsection PROJECT Q M 11-07 05. RESIDENTIAL LOTS g o Z 3. Fencing may be of a flexible configuration or chain-link and be a minimum of 4 feet in height supported by vertical C_z r o J ci m posts at a maximum of ten foot intervals to keep fencing upright and in place. OPEN SPACE AREA LOTS C. o w g z 4. A warning sign should be posted on the fencing which states,"warning:tree protection zone.this fenced area is a tree RIGHT-OF-WAY Ii N -<> w X X z X protection zone." _ — F � c� X X 3 X LEI CV C) Y W RESIDENTIAL LOTS 4 Q N z o w X o X Q X 4.1. Do not enter this fenced area N o g o 4.2. Do not store any equipment or drive vehicles in this area OPEN SPACE AREA LOTS 3 4.3. Do not crush soil or cause soil compaction, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4.4. Avoid the use of heavy machinery within the dripline of the tree. SHEET NO: 5. No construction staging or disposal of construction materials in tree protection zone. Owner/Applicant L2