Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 07-24 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, July 24,2001, at 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: n r: Tammy de Weerd -L Ron Anderson ~ Cherie McCandless -K- Keith Bird --K- Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~o v.e...- 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of June 18, 2001 City Council Joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD: appro v~ B. Approve minutes of July 3, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: ~~ 4. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) 5. Resolution No. tJ! - 3 6 7 : Resolution determining/designating certain area/property for an Urban Renewal Project: 0-pPl. 0\1 e 6. Ordinance No. & 1- q 2 I-A : Ordinance amending duties of the office of the Mayor to be a full-time position: ~lCV(' 7. Department Reports: A. Treasurer's Department - Stacy Kilchenmann: 1. Finance Report: ~&d-evL B. Public Works Department - Gary Smith: 1. Ashford Greens No.5 Drainage Easement: W'tck)t- ~ Meridian City Council Agenda - July 24, 200 I Page 1 ofl All materials presented at publio meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities relatcd to docurnents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: ~ Tammy de Weerd ~ Ron Anderson X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird - --1L- Mayor Robert Corrie- 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of June 18, 2001 City Council Joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD: Approve B. Approve minutes of July 3. 2001 City Council Meeting: Approve 4. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) 5. Resolution No. 01-367 : Resolution determining/designating certain area/property for an Urban Renewal Project: Approve 6. Ordinance No. 01-921-A : Ordinance amending duties of the office of the Mayor to be a full-time position: Approve 7. Department Reports: A. Treasurer's Department - Stacy Kilchenmann: 1. Finance Report: Presented B. Public Works Department - Gary Smith: 1. Ashford Greens No.5 Drainage Easement: Work it out Meridian City Council Agenda - July 24,200 I Page I of! All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council Meetina Julv 24.2001 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:35 P.M. on Tuesday, July 24,2001, by Mayor Robert Corrie. Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Cherie McCandless, Ron Anderson, Tammy de Weerd, and Keith Bird. Others Present: Bill Nary, Stacy Kilchenmann, Gary Smith, Bill Musser, and Ken Bowers. Item 1. Roll-call Attendance: -L Tammy de Weerd -L Ron Anderson X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird - -L Mayor Robert Corrie- Corrie: All right. It's 6:35. I will open the City Council regular meeting on Tuesday, July the 24th. The first item is roll call attendance Mr. Berg. Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Corrie: Item 2 is adoption of the agenda. Council is there any changes to the agenda? Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the adoption of the agenda. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Okay. Motion made and second to approve the adoption of the agenda. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of June 18, 2001 City Council Joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD: B. Approve minutes of July 3, 2001 City Council Meeting: ( Meridian City Council Meet.lI~ July 24, 2001 Page 2 Corrie: Item 3 is the Consent Agenda. Two items, the minutes of June 18, 2001 with the joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD and approve the minutes of July the 3rd City Council meeting. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Bird: Second. Corrie: Okay. Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES Item 4. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) Corrie: Item 4, items moved from the Consent Agenda. There is none. Item 5. Resolution No. 01-367 Resolution determining/designating certain area/property for an Urban Renewal Project: Corrie: Item 5 is a resolution determining and designating certain area of property for an Urban Renewal Project. Mr. Clerk, (inaudible) Resolution number? Berg: 01-367. Corrie: Okay. If the City Clerk would read the resolution by title only at this time. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council Resolution 01-367, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho determining certain property described below to be a <inaudible) area for a, deteriorated area. I'm sorry I was watching my stadium chairs. Or a combination thereof and designating such area as appropriate for an Urban Renewal Project. Corrie: Okay. Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have the Resolution 01-367 read in its entirety? Hearing none, Council, discussion on the resolution? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Okay. Hearing none- ( Meridian City Council Meeh,.", July 24, 2001 Page 3 De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Oh, yes Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I see one of the Committee's representatives here. Did they have any comment or just making sure we pass it tonight? Unidentified Speaker: Just here to observe. No comments unless you have questions. Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Not unless you have any issues with what's in here. Unidentified Speaker: Not on the resolution. De Weerd: Okay thank you. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we approve Resolution No. 01-367 with suspension of rules. De Weerd: Second. Corrie: Motion is made to approve Resolution No. 01~367 with suspension of rules. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the resolution say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Not on a land use do we? Unless it's land use? We can do it. Okay, do roll call. It doesn't make me any difference. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, we usually do them on the Resolutions and Ordinances. Roll Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Meridian City Council Meeti..", July 24, 2001 Page 4 Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I know that we finally got this amended. I realize you've been working for some time on pulling together the board for this group. Will we be seeing that? Corrie: Very shortly. I just want first things first. We want the resolution. Now we've got that. We'll probably, after everybody's contacted that's on the list, you'll have it probably Tuesday night. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Item 6. Ordinance No. 01-921-A Ordinance amending duties of the office of the Mayor to be a full-time position: Corrie: Item NO.6 Ordinance, Mr. Berg. Berg: 01-921-A Corrie: Okay. This is an Ordinance amending duties of the Mayor full time position. If you'll read Ordinance No. 01-921-A by title only at this point. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. Ordinance No. 01-921-A, an Ordinance of the City of Meridian, Idaho amending Title 1 Chapter 6 Section 3 subsection A 1 and 2 and providing for a new Subsection 3 and renumbering the subsections there after providing that the duties of the office of the Mayor be a full time position providing that the Mayor is a Chief Administrative Official of the City and shall preside over meetings of the City Council and determine the order of business subject to the rules of the Council and has superintending control over all officers and affairs of the City preselVe order and take care of that the ordinance of the City under provisions of the Idaho State Law governing municipal corporations are complied with and providing for the renumbering subsections 4, 5 and 6 a change of the word He to the word the Mayor. All in the Section 3 of Chapter 6 of Title 1 Meridian City Code and providing an effective date. Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have the entire ordinance read by it entirety? Hearing none, Council, any discussion? De Weerd: I have none. Corrie: Okay hearing none, I'll entertain a motion for Ordinance No. 01-921-A McCandless: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. McCandless. Meridian City Council Meel".~ July 24, 2001 Page 5 McCandless: I move that we approve the Ordinance 01-921-A for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest with a suspension of rules. Corrie: Okay do I hear a second? De Weerd: Second. Corrie: Okay. Motion been made and seconded to approve Ordinance 01-921-A with suspension of rules. Any other discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg. Roll Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 7. Department Reports: A. Treasurer's Department - Stacy Kilchenmann: 1. Finance Report: Corrie: Department reports, Treasurer Department, Stacy Kilchenmann. Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council. In front of you on your bench, I put the month's financial statements and investment report. In the future we're going to close the month earlier so you get this in a timelier manner. If you'll notice, we're starting to change the format of this. The first page you'll have will be the notes to the financial statements which will be a summary of my review of the financial statements. It'll kind of tell you highlights or changes or things that I want to draw your attention to. For the enterprise fund, as you look at your financial statements, you'll see that Public Works has a credit balance in capital outlay for the month of June. That's because they got their insurance proceeds from an automobile that was wrecked which they will replace so that credit balance will be gone. The Wastewater Treatment Plant revenues have a large negative balance for the month of June. That's due to the correction of a large billing error that occurred in May. Then if you look, and we'll cover these briefly, the graph behind here. You'll notice that water revenue collections are behind budget and that's simply because they're in their busy season now and trending should catch up. The general fund, two items of note. You'll see the City Clerk trending over budget in contract labor but then its offset by trending under in salaried positions. The police the only area that we might possibly have a budget amendment is in police salary. They're trending over budget in salary. That looks pretty consistent so we'll have to analyze to see if we want to amend the budget or if we want to move money from one of the other general fund areas. If you look just briefly behind the notes, you'll see some graphs. What those are doing is Meridian City Council M~hhl:l July 24, 2001 Page 6 comparing budget to actual. It's a fairly simple analysis. We just take the budget number we divide it by 12 and look at where we should be at this time of the year. Of course there are variations because we don't always spend evenly and we don't always collect revenue evenly so, we'll point those out to you in the notes each month if there's some kind of variation. So, the first page is the general fund. The second page, in Boise State colors, that was an accident is the enterprise fund. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Kilchenmann: That was an accident. Next- Bird: Just make sure it doesn't come up black and gold. Kilchenmann: Then the next behind that is the investment. The same thing that I gave you last month. We met with Bruce Moore from Buffington earlier today. We're kind of changing our investment strategy a little bit. The Investment Committee has just approved that we move some money so, what we're going to do is restructure the general fund investments to beat the debt service rate. I think its 4.53 percent that we need to beat. We talked to Mr. Moore and he'll be kind of moving money around in the general fund so we can beat that rate. What we're looking at now is we're not going to go long term because we think interest rates will probably rise so we don't want tie the money into anything real long term. Hopefully, we can ladder onto the hopeful increase in interest rates. We'll be monitoring that every month. Then we're moving some money from the building fund into the Idaho Pool because we can get a better interest rate and we think that we'll probably have to start using that for construction, hopefully using that for construction. De Weerd: You better be using that for construction. Kilchenmann: ~~ in December when Tom should have some design fees and so forth. That's alii have. Are there any questions? Corrie: Stacy, (inaudible) on the second page there, PC and (inaudible). Kilchenmann: PC is personnel cost and OE is operating cost. Co is capitol outlay. Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Does Council have any questions? Bird: No. Very good Stacy. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. I did have one question. Stacy, why would the police salaries be running over what was budgeted. Have you done any kind of analysis on that? I mean everything's pretty well laid out in the budget process ( Meridian City Council Meel..,~ July 24, 2001 Page 7 that you should know merit increases and pay increases and al that kind of stuff. If its not budgeted for then you don't do it. r mean is there a reason why that's running over or have you looked at that? Kilchenmann: Mayor, Council and Councilman Anderson. My understanding is that a STEP Program was instituted during the current fiscal year that was not incorporated in the budgeting process and that's what has caused salaries to go over. Bird: I thought the STEP was already -- excuse me, Mr. Mayor. I know one thing Councilman Anderson that did it was if you remember we had to go back on the canine, that settlement and come over on that. I thought the STEP Program was already in when we came into this fiscal year. Anderson: Yes, I thought it was too. Bird: The three years I've been on we've always ran a little over on salaries probably due to overtime and stuff unforeseen. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: Stacy, if you'll get with Pauline and see if we did not have the clear totals when we initiated the STEP Program and see if that's, that and the canines were the only reason that we're having the --. Kilchenmann: I'll verify that. Bird: Thank you. Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Any further questions, discussions? Bird: I have none. Thank you Stacy. B. Public Works Department - Gary Smith: 1. Ashford Greens No.5 Drainage Easement: Corrie: All right. The next item is Public Works Department, Gary Smith Ashford Greens NO.5 Drainage Easement. Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. City Engineer Brad Watson has been working on this project so I think I'll just turn the microphone over to Brad and let him lead the discussion. i Meridian City Council MOOt.. 'l:J July 24, 2001 Page 8 Watson: Thank you Mayor and Council. Hopefully in your packets you have a copy of a memo I sent to you last week that summarizes the situation. First of all, let me say that the issue here is that there's a Drainage Easement proposed on City property that must take Council action to approve. That's the basis for this coming before you. It's not a town hall meeting that I'm trying to conduct here. It would be appear to be a simple matter of granting this easement but as you can see from the memo it involves quite a few players and some varied opinions. Representatives from Cherry Lane Recreation, Brighton Corporation and the Ada County Highway District are all here tonight if you have any questions of them. One thing, the reason I felt I had to finally bring this to Council is these plans for Ashford NO.5 are ready to go to construction. They've been through DEQ. They're approved and this is the only issue that keeps them or keeps us from scheduling the pre-construction meeting with them. If this Drainage Easement doesn't work or isn't approved where it is presently located they would have to redesign the subdivision, redesign the streets. That's why we can't go to construction. There's been also the question of the design review authority I guess that Cherry Lane Recreation has in its lease. Mr. Nichols, I think can speak to that better than I can. He did answer me by email. I think I'm done unless there are any questions. These representatives are here. I'm sure they would love to elaborate on what I said but I'll answer any questions. Corrie: Let me ask Attorney. Bill, do you want to address your take on this and then we can go through the steps of ACHD, and then the developer and then the Cherry Lane Rec people and kind of get an idea of where we are. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council because this issue came up the general concept is when your property has been leased out you can't take any action with the property that's inconsistent with the leaseholder's rights in the property. That's the general concept. I looked at the lease for the golf course which has been extended. Cherry Lane Recreation sent us a letter last year indicating that they were exercising their 30-year extension. I also looked at the underlying agreement with, I think its New Pacific whereby the City acquired the golf course to begin with. There's nothing in the lease that specifically addresses a specific easement such as a Drainage Easement or any other type of easement. There is an obligation on the part of the City which is then assigned or delegated to the lessee to maintain the golf course in essentially good condition. I mean that's where it stands. The leaseholder has some rights to say whether something is appropriate or not. It's my understanding there's not a problem with the Drainage Easement itself. The problem is with ACHD's requirement for a gravel road. That's where we get the hang-up. Those are the general concepts. Corrie: Okay. Gary let me ask you. We had the discussion this morning. Did you find out anything on that about, the Preliminary Plat? We signed and went it through. We talked about ~- I'm talking gibberish. I know it sounds (inaUdible) but you know what I'm talking about. { Meridian City Council Meet,..:,! July 24, 2001 Page 9 Smith: Mr. Mayor, Council members the Preliminary or Concept Plan for the golf course area showed some drainage areas on golf course property from the subdivision. They weren't specifically located, or weren't located specifically at that time but it did show that the concept of having the drainage areas on the golf course property was part of the Concept Plan. We've seen the drainage areas come to fruition on other phases of the subdivision. Some of them have had some problems and some of them haven't but they've, I think all been cleared up at this point. I'm not sure of that but I think they have all been cleared up at this point. Anyway, that's generally what happened in the past. I mean, generally speaking that's what's happened in the past. That there were to be provisions made for drainage areas on the golf course property from Ashford Greens Subdivision. As Brad mentioned, or Bill Nichols mentioned the drainage ponds themselves is not the issue here. It's the access road, the gravel access road that's being required by ACHD. That is, as we discussed this morning Mayor, part of their requirement to access the drainage ponds for maintenance. Similar to what Public Works Department requires for sewer lines in order for us to access the sewer lines for maintenance. Of course in this particular context, it appears that it's a non - well it doesn't work with the golf course and a gravel road along side the fairway. That's Cherry Lane Recreation's objection to that. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I guess my question is when this came through for Preliminary and maybe Final Plat, were these part of ACHD's comments that this gravel road would be necessary? Was it drawn in this general location at that time at that time of platting where the drainage area would be? Smith: Brad says it was not specifically located in this area. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Gary, it seems like I recall too there was something similar to this when we were talking about Bear Creek out there. That there was going to be some retainage ponds needed there and that there was another way that you could engineer it where those retention ponds were actually under the ground where you could have flat level grassy surfaces. Is that a possibility here? That they could do something similar to that? Then an access road wouldn't be required because it would all be underground? Smith: I think I'm going to turn it back over to Brad because I haven't ~~ I'm not familiar with the details of the design Councilman Anderson. So, I'll let Brad- ( Meridian City Council Meet".:,! July 24. 2001 Page 10 Watson: The groundwater in this area is notoriously high and the seepage beds in the right of way don't work. They don't meet the requirements of ACHD, the 3 feet of separation so they have to use swales out here. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I think ACHD has added this in after everything was passed, our findings, facts, everything that we did was passed if I recall right I don't recall ever seeing this on here until this deal came out. Am I not correct? Watson: Councilman Bird, Mayor and Council members. Every plat that has come through, these offsite drainage facilities hasn't been specifically part of the plat. They are off site on City property and we have, at staff level worked with them through the design as to the location. One thing I should point out when these plans initially came to Public Works there were two swales in totally separate locations. This one swale is intended to serve both Phase 5 and 6. The developer and his engineer did work with us pretty diligently to get those combined into one facility. The other two locations that were originally proposed -- this is going to be hard to explain without a map, but were at the far west end and the far east end of the two phases combined where access wasn't as big of an issue. However, there wasn't a lot of room there and it tended to, well at least one location, I seem to recall and Cherry Lane Recreation can speak to this better than I can, seemed to interfere with the normal course of play. Smith: Mayor and Council. One of the thing that I might offer to you just in terms of the process. When the Final Plat comes before you, this type of information is not part of the Final Plat. It's part of the Development Plans that are engineered then from the Final Plat. Those two go together but you don't see the Development Plans for the subdivision. Those Development Plans are approved by Public Works Department. They're approved on the basis of the configuration of the Final Plat. The number of lots, the street locations and so forth but the details of building all of the infrastructure there, the streets, the sanitary sewer, the water and drainage and so forth doesn't show up on the Final Plat which is what you folks see. Corrie: Okay, any other questions from Council at this point? Bird: I have none Mayor. De Weerd: Just one. Corrie: Okay, Mrs. de Weerd. ( Meridian City Council Meet...", July 24, 2001 Page 11 De Weerd: Now, there are other drainage for other phases of Ashford Greens but they haven't required the road, the access road? Is that because you're combining two phases here and it's bigger? Why is this different than the other drainage areas? Smith: I believe in size this is a bigger drainage swale. Brad said all the rest are right next to the public right-of-way, adjacent to public right-of-way where the golf course swings out to the public right-of-way or near it. This is a -- the Highway District has divided the maintenance of the drainage ponds into two pieces. One is called light maintenance which is performed typically by the homeowners association in which the drainage pond exists which is typically a common area on other subdivisions. In this case it's the golf course so the light maintenance would be done by the (inaudible). That includes mowing of the grass, picking up surface debris, if there is material that comes in from the street such as silts, taking that off the ground surface. The other portion of the maintenance is what's called heavy maintenance. That's where the Highway District gets involved. That would be replacing anything that is below the surface that would require equipment to maintain. Corrie: Okay. I think at this point the key issue is this requirement if ACHD. Is an ACHD representative here tonight? If you would kind of come up and fill us in why this requirement is here now and where ACHD is coming from and going to. Insulman: Okay. My name is Gary Insulman. I'm the supervisor of the Development Review Division. The reason we require the access road is because the swale or the retention pond is located along the back lot lines outside of the public right-of-way. It's not adjacent to the public street The master plan that we had reviewed a year ago and going through Phase 4, it included the areas of Phase 5 and 6 included the two retention ponds that Brad mentioned. They were located adjacent to the street. In that case we wouldn't need an access road because we can access from the street After Phase 5 was submitted, we were told that the golf course didn't want the ponds there so the developer and his engineer relocated those two into one pond in the current location shown on the plans today. We do have other access roads in Phase 3. There are two cul-de-sacs with two ponds between the two and there's an access road linking those cui de sacs are access to retention ponds. This isn't unprecedented. It's a standard requirement of the Highway District that we be able to access our facilities and is particularly a req uirement of this type of facility. We do not dictate the type of facility they design. Their engineer proposed it. It meets our requirements and we accepted it or would once the easement is approved. If the requirements cant be met than they're welcome to submit other design alternatives or put the ponds back adjacent to the public street Any other questions you might have? Meridian City Council Meelll'~ July 24, 2001 Page 12 Anderson: I have a question. Specifically, does your requirement say that it has to be gravel road or does it just have to support a certain amount of weight? What is your requirement? Insulman: It just has to meet the loading requirements for our trucks and there are cases where they can use grass Crete, or we've had, in other golf courses, they've beefed up the asphalt cart path and put a gravel strip along the side of it or something so that it's the minimum 12 feet in width. Someone mentioned Bear Creek, the bike path that's being built to our loading requirements so we can use the bike path to access the storm drain manholes and we have waived the width requirement to 10 feet in certain stretches of it to meet the City's requirements. There are other alternatives to gravel but that's our minimum req ui rement. Anderson: Okay. Thank you. Corrie: Has it been explained to the people here that are involved in this, the golf course people and Mr. Turnball? Insulman: I've dealt mainly with Mr. Turnball's Engineer but I did speak to him briefly yesterday I believe. I haven't spoke to the golf course people directly. I spoke to Mr. Johnson once or twice a long time ago. This project has kind of drug out. Corrie: Any other questions right now? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Okay. Thank you Gary. Dave, (inaudible). Then we can hear their-- Turnball: I don't know if this would be appropriate, we were actually making some progress out in the hallway before you short-circuited. I thought you guys would go forever and ever on your previous agenda. I don't know if it would be appropriate just to ask for a 5-minute recess so I can probably talk to Mr. lnsulman and Mr. Watson about something that we were kicking around out there. Maybe it will - Bird: We can do it. Corrie: Is it okay with you guys? Okay we'll have a recess for 5 minutes? Turnball: I would before then point out that when we started this project ACHD didn't have a requirement of the gravel roads. We do have a drainage swale in the first phase of Ashford Greens that is not adjacent to right-of-way. It's behind the back lot lines and it's basically piped down, cart path access and along the back lot lines into a swale. Maybe the requirement was there 5 years ago but it I Meridian City Council Meeit...,j July 24, 2001 Page 13 wasn't enforced if it was because we do have those kind of situations (inaudible). I'd like to get together with these guys. Corrie: What (inaudible)? Give them 10 minutes? Okay we'll come back at 20 after 7. Reconvened At 6:35 P.M. Corrie: -- order. David will be - Bird: You can have mine David. Turnball: Mr. Mayor am I okay to speak now? Corrie: Yes you certainly are. Turnball: I think we will work things out. I think we need to just do a little reengineering, probably redefine the easement and I think we'll be okay. That's kind of what we're going to work for. Okay. I handed this out. This is something I prepared. This was an attachment to the agreement when we gifted the property for the golf course to the City which shows the proposed Drainage Easements. Now I must say that we have worked with the City as we have gone through the process and tried to figure out the actual best places that they would work. I think this shows you in the agreement that we had with the City that storm drainage was always factored in. In Phase 1 they were all put in exactly where it's shown. In fact if you look at the top of that map at the top yellow portion, that's the area where there's a storm drainage swale that doesn't have any access road adjacent to it that's not adjacent to any right-of-way. That's the one I was speaking of previously. I think where we are right now. If Jennifer has a question, I'll stand by but we're going to try to split that easement a little further north, excuse me not north, east to get it further away from the tee boxes. We'll taker that drainage and shift it as much as we can give the grade that we have to work with. Then we will install a grass crete pathway instead of just a gravel pathway anywhere west of tot 37 in the plat. I think that's what we just agreed to. I'll let Jennifer-- Lovan-Holloway: Mayor, Council. Thank you guys. I mean it's -- oh, my name is jennifer Lovan-Hoiloway. Thank you it's been a rough road. You know, Mr. Turnballl think we have something that we can work with. Hopefully we can get it ail worked out. i just want to make sure with Mike, aiso that -- j'm sorry, Mike, David. I've been dealing with MIke all along -- That when he meets -- you are aiso meeting tornorrow with the access road and everything for our easements on that same hole? With Dick but everything else is - we'd like to work with -- and it, for future, where we're trying to get them i think wiii be sufficient for both the city and for the goif course. f { Meridian City Council Meffi,..~ July 24, 2001 Page 14 Corrie: Okay that being the case, this was mute at this point until you can (inaudibie). Get everybody together. Bird: Thank you guys. Corrie: Thank you very much. Bird: Thafs the kind we Ilke. Corrie: That concludes the agenda. I would like to add one thing here. It is a ietter to the dear City Councli. Thank you so much for making a recycie program. It will help the City to not be polluted and to help the City stay active. People who are serious about the heiping of the environment shouid recycie but not oniy paper but many other things. Recycling will be helping our City, also the world. Thanks aQain for aiiowin(~ the city to make a recyciino. prOQram. Sincerely Roann de VVeerd~ citizen of Meridian. ! think that was very ~i~e. ~ ii's just to the 'Council. De vVeerd, Anyway, i ask-- De VVeerd: iviayoL I think its De VI/eera. Corrie: Yes but, anyway i want -- I ask Tammy if i couid put this in my office. \Ne'll frame it Peooie that cornE-'! in and hoi!P-( and Clrios about their recvdina which is almost nil ~ow~- So~ i-~a~--sh-ow the~ that..or Again-, th~nk you f~r th~ Ordinance No. 01-921-A i think we're progressing, looking forward and i think we're vvell on our agenda. So, if there's nothing else to come before the Council! wili thank evervbodv for a Cluick rnE-'!etino. it's 7:30 I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. -J J - lh- - --- - 'u . - - . --- Bird: So moved~ Corrie: All in favor say aye. iv'!OT!ON CARRIED: ALL /\,YES fv1EETif'-JG !\DjOURNED i~~\T 7:30 PJV1. (TAPE Oi\i FiLE OF THESE PROCEEDit~GS) ~~~~,~ ** TX CONF [RMRT [ON REPORT *'" RS OF JUL 17 '01 PRGE.01 CITY OF MERlDlRN DRTE T I ME TO/FROM 02 07/17 08: 10 3810160 MODE M I N/SEC PGS CMD!:1 STRTUS EC--S 00' 31" 001 016 OK ?Iftl,f.e hf/ ~ Itb~(,Ic. ;';;f;^ut. - ~a.-/~J MAYOR Roben D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VAllEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 8364Z (208) 888.4433 . Fax (208) 887.4813 City CJerk Office Fax (208) 8884218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288.2499 . P.lx 288.2501 PUIlLIC WORKS BUn-DING DEPAR1MENT (20&) &&7-22lJ . Fu 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR7MENT (208) 8S<l-SS33 . Fax 888-6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird . Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless NOTICE OF SPECIAL WORKSHOP MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold Special Workshops at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, July 17th, 2001 at 8:00 AM and Wednesday, July 18th, 2001 at 9:30 AM. The Meridian City Council will be receiving preliminary budget presentations for each specific department of the City of Meridian. The public is welcome to attend. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 7-17-01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR HERON BROOK TOWNHOMES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MERIDIAN ROAD AND BLUE HERON LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. TE-OI-006 ORDER GRANTING A SIX (6) MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL PLAT BY: PINNACLE ENGINEERS This matter coming on regularly before the City Council on the 17th day of July, 2001, upon the Applicant's time application for a six (6) month extension within which to submit the Final Plat, which was originally approved on July 18, 2000, as provided in S 12-3-6 B, and good cause appearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT: The above named Applicant is granted a six (6) month extended period of time until January 18,2002, of this Order within which to submit the Final Development Plan Plat for the above entitled subdivision application. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting on the 17th day of July, 2001. Order Granting A Six (6) Month Time Extension For Filing The Final Plat (TE-01-006) . ~/... DATED this ~day of cT tdj- , 2001. Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Warks and the City Attorney. By:~~4- 4e'l" ~ City Clerk Dated: 7~/7-(}1 Z:\Work\M\Mcridian\Mcridian I 536DM\HeronBrook Townhouses TED I-006\FPTime Extension- [-006.doc Order Granting A Six (6) Month Time Extension For Filing The Final Plat (TE-O 1-006) 2 RESOLUTION NO. ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, DETERMINING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW TO BE A DETERIORATED AREA OR A DETERIORATING AREA OR A COMBINATION THEREOF AND DESIGNATING SUCH AREA AS APPROPRIATE FORAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, the area described below contains land which has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness, diversity of ownership, or a combination of such factors, resulting in economic underdevelopment of the area which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the City of Meridian; and WHEREAS, the area described below contains land which is predominantly open and which has diversity of ownership, resulting in economic underdevelopment of the area or substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the City of Meridian. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: That the area shown on the map (which area is crossed hatched), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is determined to be a deteriorated area or a deteriorating area, or a combination thereof. The area shown on the map is generally bordered on the north by Fairview Avenue, on the south by Franldin Road and Interstate 84, on the west by North 4th Street West and Meridian Road, and on the east by East 4th Street and North Stratford Drive. SECTION 2: That the area described above is designated as appropriate for an urban renewal project, and shall be la10VVl1 as Urban Renewal Area # 1. SECTION 3: That the Mayor and City Council hereby find it necessary and advisable, in order to assure orderly economic development that the above described area, and is in the public interest for management and sound growth, to URBAN RENEWAL AREA RESOLUTION PAGE I OF 2 designate the above area to be known as Urban Renewal Area # I. SECTION 4: This Resolution supercedes any previous Resolutions of the Meridian City Council designating the boundaries of Urban Renewal Area 1. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 2001. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 2001. By: Mayor Robert D. Corrie ATTEST: City Clerk Z:\Work\M\Merictian\Merictian 15360M\Resolutions City HaIl\200 I\UrbanRenewaIAreaResolution.wpd URBAN RENEWAL AREA RESOLUTION PAGE 2 OF 2 Ll: ~ w -.:i ~ 2 <( a: u.. w ~ C'": ~ ~ Ol:l31! ,;, ,...;., ~ ~ Cl c:: Cl Z ~=~,.toy :) c:: LlJ > o LlJ ~,~' i .~~'_. . i '2'-1 ~ J.-" 1/.e~J-t (/{)jl- 1('# fI~f:;II2..II/)I7?.e. - ("7~l.J' MAYOR Roben D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288.2499 . Fax 288.2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . Fax 888.6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP I MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL & ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS & ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian, the Ada County Commissioners and the Ada County Highway District Commissioners will hold a Special Joint Workshop / Meeting at the Ada County Commissioners Public Hearing Room on the 3rd Floor of the Ada County Building, 650 Main, Boise, Idaho, on Monday, July 23rd, 2001 at 8:30 A.M. The Meridian City Council, Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Commissioners along with representatives from Idaho Transportation Department will be discussing transportation planning issues regarding the growth in the Area of Meridian City Impact. The public is welcome to attend. i/~~I~ERK Meridian City Council Joint Meetina with July 23. 2001 Ada Countv Hiahway District and Ada County Commissioners The special joint meeting of the Meridian City Council with the Ada County Commissioners and the Ada County Highway District was called to order at 8:35 A.M. on Monday, July 23, 2001, by Ada County Highway District Commissioner Judy Peavey Derr. Council Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, Ron Anderson, and Tammy de Weerd. Council Members Absent: Cherie McCandless. Other Staff Present: Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Bill Nichols, and Will Berg. ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS & MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING MINUTES JULY 23, 2001, 8:30 AM The Board of Ada County Commissioners (Board) met this date in an Open Meeting in the Boise City Council Chambers to act on the following item. The following were present: Sharon M. Ullman, Grant P. Kingsford, Jeff Patlovich, Patricia Nilsson, and Nichoel Baird Spencer, Ada County; Judy Peavey-Derr, Susan Eastlake, Sherry Huber, Dave Wynkoop, Dave Bivens, Jay Schweitzer, and Diane Kushlan, Ada County Highway District, Mayor Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, Ron Anderson, Tammy deWeerd, Cherie McCandless, Shari Stiles, Bill Nichols, Gary Smith, and Will Berg, City of Meridian; Wendell Bingham, Meridian School District; Dave Turnbull, Brighton Corporation; Frank Varriale and Becky Bowcutt, Primeland Development Company; Clair Bowman, COMPASS; Elaine Clegg and Jon Barrett, Idaho Smart Growth; Eric Shannon, Idaho Transportation Department; John Eaton, Building Contractors Association; Ramon Yorgason, Capital Development, Michael Wardle and Jon Wardle, Wardle and Associates; Justin Martin and Brian McColl, Far West LLC; Brad McColl, Wilson and McColl; Jim Conger, Conger Management Group; and Herbert Atienza, The Idaho Statesman. Minutes Recorder: Gloria Uscola. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IN THE MATTER OF CALL TO ORDER: ACHD Commissioner Judy Peavey Derr called the meeting to order at approximately 8:35 a.m. II. IN THE MATTER OF CHANGES TO THE AGENDA: There were none. III. IN THE MATTER OF NEW BUSINESS: Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 2 J. Peavey-Derr requested that they go around the room and have everyone present introduce himself or herself for the record. She said at the last meeting, the developers offered to hire a consultant. Therefore, she turned the meeting over to Dave Turnbull to present a report. D. Turnbull said they held some meetings with the developers and at the first meeting, they retained the services of Mike Wardle. They had a meeting with Elaine Clegg and Jon Barrett of Idaho Smart Growth along with a couple of people they have been working with from Treasure Valley Futures. Mike Wardle has compiled a report of the activities that have taken place to date and completed a plan to move forward. M. Wardle handed out the North Meridian Planning Area Status Report, dated July 23, 2001. Since the last meeting on June 18, 2001, the developers met on June 22, 2001, and they initiated the process. However, they have not developed a whole work program. He reviewed some the assumptions (page one of Status Report) that he thought would be associated with this effort as it moves forward. They would be going through a series of steps, which were outlined in Tool #4 of the status report. Currently they were at Step No.1, identify the Stakeholders and Understand Their Issues. They have talked to the agencies to find out what planning efforts are underway. The next step is to visit with all of the elected officials involved including the City of Meridian, Ada County, and ACHD because those three entities have the most involvement in the planning and platting process. He said this type of a planning process is not quick. They have to go through a stage of public involvement or the effort will be wasted. This will be a community process that achieves the goals of both Meridian and the development community. M. Wardle continued by saying that they have gotten responses from all of the agencies and the officials that they requested information from. Also, they made contacts with everyone at the staff level. The next step is for them to meet with elected officials and prepare a work program and schedule. In order to do so, they needed to clarify who the lead government agency is for meeting notices, organization and location. Also, they needed to confirm the planning area and set a tentative date for work program presentation to the stakeholders, which should be four to six weeks out from this point. A stakeholder list was included in the status report packet and he asked everyone to submit any corrections, additions, and edits to him. J. Peavey-Derr said in regard to confirming the planning area, she asked a member of the ACHD staff if they were in agreement with the planning Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 3 area described in the status report. D. Kushlan replied that they were in agreement with it. J. Peavey-Derr asked Mayor Corrie if Meridian was in agreement with the planning area depicted. Mayor Corrie replied that he thought it should go to Eagle Road and the County line. J. Peavey-Derr clarified that it would include the land one mile east and one mile west. She asked if the development community would have a problem expanding the area as stated. D. Turnbull said he was concerned that if they made the area too large, they would not be able to focus on a specific planning area. The area east of Locust Grove is already platted. He thought the area west of Black Cat should have its own planning area. R. Anderson said they have already seen a number of development requests in these particular areas and they are definitely going to have to tie into this other eight square mile area and the planning process that will go on with those. When Meridian looks at their problems regarding public safety, park, roads, etc., they feel strongly about including the other four square miles in this process. J. Wardle said they did not expect to work in isolation from Meridian's comprehensive planning effort. There would be close coordination with Meridian's staff. E. Clegg said the areas to the east and west should be considered, but maybe its possible not to consider them in quite as much detail. I n regard to the area to the east, the main consideration would be the interface with what already exists and what is planned there. She thought it made sense to concentrate the work on the eight square miles. J. Peavey asked if it would acceptable to the Meridian City Council to do this on a somewhat main section and subsection basis so those four square miles could be considered but the concentration would be on the eight square miles. Mayor Corrie replied that was acceptable. P. Nilsson said the Boise City Comprehensive Plan goes west of Eagle Road. While it should be referenced, she thought they should contact the City of Boise about it. D. Turnbull replied that he considers the section east of Locust Grove between Chinden and McMillan in Boise's Area of Impact. Most of the rest of it is platted or preliminary platted and well on its way to being developed. He said that was his rationale for not involving some of those areas. Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 4 S. Eastlake said from a transportation point-of-view, she thought it was a mistake to stop any kind of plan on one side of the street. She asked that all of the fronting property on Chinden, Black Cat, Locust Grove, and Ustick be included as well. Matching driveway locations, signalization, etc. are dependant on using two sides of the street. D. Turnbull replied that they could look at that as far as transportation concerns but those areas are outside of Meridian's Area of Impact. S. Huber said that M. Wardle indicated that it was important to have all the stakeholders agree before moving forward and know what their jobs are in this. She thought there were six major topics to consider related to water, sewer, roads, parks, fire, etc. She asked if he had identified anything unusual that would not fall into those areas. M. Wardle replied that she identified most of them but there is one issue that is going to come up- the irrigation districts. ACHD is the party that is going to have to deal with that issue because eventually, almost all of the arterial systems, collector systems, and the local streets will be draining into facilities that ACHD is going to help provide. Mayor Corrie said he would like them to consider west of Black Cat Road to the County line. This area is progressing and there are going to be some problems if they ignore it. D. Turnbull clarified if he meant from Ustick north of Chinden and Black Cat Road west to McDermott. Mayor Corrie replied that was correct. D. Turnbull said he did not think there was a problem with it. However, the challenge in that area is that there are different sewer systems and a few other differences. D. Wynkoop said in response to M. Wardle's comments, ACHD is not a drainage district and has no funding for drainage facilities. He said that is a very difficult community-wide problem. D. Bivens said in addition to what S. Huber identified as the major issues, he thought they had not mentioned police and security, which would be a major concern for Meridian. J. Peavey-Derr stated she thought the understanding of this body was that the boundaries are fine with consideration being given to the areas west of Black Cat. She said they should now discuss the stakeholders list and asked if there was anyone else that needed to be added other than the police and irrigation districts. K. Bird said the obvious ones for Meridian are the police, fire, and parks departments. . Also, he thought they should add the Nampa-Meridian Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 5 Irrigation District. D. Turnbull commented that almost the entire area is in the Settlers Irrigation District but some parts may be in other districts and that could be verified. S. Ullman added that another thing to keep in mind was the Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Ada County has had discussion with the City of Meridian about where EMS should be out there. D. Wynkoop stated they should add Drainage District NO.2 or 4. He was not sure which one is in this area. G. Kingsford commented that they should include the utility companies. T. deWeerd said they should include the library districts on the list. E. Clegg stated they should include the Public Transit Authority because the area will be served by transit at some point. Also, she said they needed to consider the current residents in Meridian because they were going to have a big stake in accepting that this is how they see their city developing. If they do not include the current resident, there is going to be opposition in implementing the plan. J. Peavey-Derr asked if there were any neighborhood associations that would be interested. Mayor Corrie replied that they do not have any. M. Wardle said there would have to be general public notices provided so that the community is given the opportunity to review this. T. deWeerd commented that they might want to have a representative the Meridian Chamber of Commerce on the stakeholders list. Mayor Corrie said they could remove Thomas Barberio from the list because he is in California. He was on the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission. S. Eastlake asked if there were any major wetland issues or something that the Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) or the Central District Health Department should be aware of. J. Peavey-Derr replied that they could be invited to the discussion if they have any input they would like to provide. J. Peavey-Derr continued that they needed to discuss the tentative date for the work program presentation to the stakeholders. She asked M. Wardle what his thoughts were on it. M. Wardle replied that it should Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 6 happen within four to six weeks. They will define a tentative work program and the development community will review it to ensure they are committed and want to fund it. Then, the intent is to come to a meeting such as this one to present the work program and get any input in order to move forward. He said they would be making phone calls and setting up specific appointments with the stakeholders as needed. J. Peavey-Derr suggested that all the stakeholders dedicate a week that they would be available. She asked if the week of August 13th would be acceptable. M. Wardle replied that he would be willing to try to concentrate it into that kind of a timeframe. However, he did not expect everyone to be available but he would try. D. Turnbull said if M. Wardle is able to meet with the different people earlier than that week, he should so there is not a big time crunch for him. J. Peavey-Derr said they would be available that week but if he wants to meet with anyone earlier, that was acceptable. J. Peavey-Derr stated they needed to clarify the lead governmental agency for meeting notices. She asked C. Bowman if COMPASS wanted to be that agency because that seemed to be the logical choice. C. Bowman replied that COMPASS would be happy to help. He said that COMPASS was relocating on August 15, 2001, and their new conference room would be available beginning the week of August 20th. J. Patlovich said if there is a potential amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, the City of Meridian has to give the legal notice for the meeting. He did not think COMPASS could do it legally. Mayor Corrie suggested M. Wardle meet with Meridian on August 14, 2001, because they have a planning meeting that night and he would be able to meet with everyone at one time. M. Wardle replied that would be acceptable. S. Eastlake referred to Steps One through Eight on the "Specific Area Planning Process" worksheet in the status report and asked for clarification on where they were in the process. M. Wardle replied that Step Three is in process currently because they are gathering data but by the next meeting, they would still be at Step Two, where they establish the program and the process. He did not think they would get to Step Four by the next meeting. F. Varriale asked what timeframe they were looking at to complete all eight steps of the process. M. Wardle replied that he had not put a timeframe on it but he thought it would take the rest of this year and the Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 7 early part of next year. The development community would have to be somewhat patient because this is the kind of process that you cannot push beyond community buy-in or it will fail. F. Varriale thought they needed to specify a timeframe if they were going to keep the development community enthusiastic about this project. He thought part of the reason the developers stepped up to do this was to solve specific problems in an expeditious matter. He was concerned that the process was broadening and they would be addressing other issues than the six they originally identified. Initially, they set a four to six-month timeframe to bring forward solutions and now the timeframe is being extended. He thought if they were looking at a process that would take six months to a year, they should get input from the development group and see if that was acceptable to them. When they started this, it was an emergency situation and they were trying to solve immediate problems. Now, he saw this settling into a process that was going to move much slower and be much more detailed, and as a result, it may take a long time to solve anything. M. Wardle responded that he understood his concerns but they were not proposing to recreate the steps and the basic information that has already been generated by Meridian's comprehensive planning process. He said the concerns that have been expressed will become key to the implementation of this plan. Before they come back to the next meeting with the stakeholders, they will confirm the development community's support. They would not put anyone through the agony of a process if that support does not exist. He thought there are some major concerns about this but also, some great opportunities. If there is enough patience to work through this process, they could accomplish something unique and dramatic for Meridian. He hoped everyone would be patient because the public had to buy in to this project but not force it. He had no desire to make this process long and slow. D. Turnbull said he thought F. Varriale was correct because when they met a month ago, they said if this was going to be a 12 to 18-month process, none of the developers would be interested in participating. However, much of the groundwork has been laid. He said it was up to them to bring the stakeholders together, get a commitment from the public agencies, and get the public participation process off the ground quickly. He said if this sat on the table too long, they would not get anywhere so they needed to be focused. J. Peavey-Derr said she saw a great commitment from the agencies represented at this table and they were after solutions. They were not trying to delay the process. Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeling July 23, 2001 Page 8 T deWeerd agreed and said if this was not done properly, they would see individual applications coning in for a long time. She said they had to spend time with the detail upfront in order to make it work. She thought if this took six to eight months, it would save them a lot of time because the developers would not have to go through every agency independently with each development application. If they do it right to begin with, it will work. D. Bivens said he thought this plan was an expedited process rather than a delayed one. He thought it was better to address this as a whole rather than individually. It would save everyone, including the developers, a lot of time. D. Turnbull said they have laid out a program that includes public involvement through the hearing process and the developers were not pretending that was going to go away. In order to get to that public hearing process, they are counting on being the elected officials to be representatives of the people. The developers were concerned about too many people being at the table because it would slow the process down. They picked the key officials that are representing the public at large and counting on them to represent the voters. S. Huber if they were listening to what everyone was saying, they were not all saying the same thing. As elected officials, they may not be recognizing the constraints the developers are under with regard to financial issues and getting started on their developments. Their reason for participating in the process is to expedite it. The process sometimes is cumbersome and so she thought they needed to look at ways to make it faster. If they do not, the incentive goes away for the developers and then they will get individual applications in a piecemeal fashion because it becomes more cost-effective for the developers to do it that way. She thought they needed to be careful because they were not quite together on that issue from what she was hearing. E. Clegg said she tries to remind herself that this is not an overnight process and a development may get implemented. They were looking at the 20-year future of this area and they need to keep that in mind. If they could find the patience and look forward, they could make a better community in 20 years. J. Peavey-Derr asked M. Wardle when he planned to meet with this group again. M. Wardle replied that he was at their disposal. They will have a defined work program and a schedule that the development community is agreeable to. J. Peavey-Derr said she wanted to give him enough time to Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23, 2001 Page 9 put everything together. She asked if they should meet in the latter part of August or in September. C. Bowman suggested holding the next meeting on August 27, 2001 r which would be about five weeks out. He said the conference room in the new COMPASS building would be available. J. Peavey-Derr said they would meet there at 8:30 a.m. T. deWeerd appreciated that they were going to meet in Meridian next time. She said she had a concern about D. Turnbull's comment in regard to public participation. She realized their community elected them but she thought they had to involve the public in the process. She could not represent them without giving them an opportunity to speak for themselves. J. Peavey-Derr replied that it states clearly in the status report that they believe the public should be a part of the process. M. Wardle said there are two levels of stake holders-the key officials and then others that need to be involved from an information and input perspective but do not have to be around this table. He did not think the group should get much larger. J. Peavey-Derr stated the next meeting would be August 27 r 2001, 8:30 a.m., at the new COMPASS building in Meridian. In the meantime, they would have meetings the week of August 13, 2001, if not sooner, with M. Wardle and his group. She thanked everyone for attending and the meeting was adjourned. IV. IN THE MATTER OF ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Board on this date, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:25 a.m. G.P. Kingsford, Acting Chairman ATTEST: Meridian City Council Joint with Ada County Commissioners and Ada County Highway District Meeting July 23. 2001 Page 10 J, David Navarro, Ada County Clerk (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: ell//f/~ RODI:R'f D. CORRIE, M:J,,";'OR "- ~cC Ie. f.]/J-d....,- (/roe.rl'cten.-(;- Cih; Co-vvn~ c?---I'3-0! ~~~~()f,"-'" .' 1~,~,""~'" ~~ {I. /~~~~:\~ ~..~// '" flVy %'. /~ . (. ;~,SKAL l...) WlLLJAM G. BERG, JR., C ..YCLERK % "'a ~ f61 ,~:j:. .l ~-':...... ~',~ 'lfP'.,1fb(/ ".t~~~_;~~*"\.'\l