HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 06-19
.. ...... rI'
.. .. ....
~ r1'rI'Yrl' .I' ..... .1'.1'.1'.1''': "1""...1' ... ~... *--:. ~..: -. .I' ~rI'.... -;:::.:'" ::. -:::. - /.~-;. ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ .... ~"",w" Yrl'
./~.... .
c.....
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday I June 19, 2001 at 6:30 p.m~
City Council Chambers
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Tammy de Weerd
Cherie cCandless
Mayor Robert Corrie
2. Adoption of the Agenda: a,f'PJ-O ~ wIlL ~~
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
3. Consent Agenda:
J'lt..O ve 10
!>" - c.
A.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
AZ 01-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 4 acres from R-1
to C-C for proposed Hark's Corner by Van Hees Properties - 119
South Linder Road: a.-~ V'~
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
CUP 01-011 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for commercial
development with fueling stations, drive-thru, coffee shop, carwash
and future retail in a proposed C-C zone for proposed Hark's
Corner by Van Hees Properties -119 South Linder Road: atprove,
Tabled from June 5, 2001: Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law: CUP 01-009 Request for Conditional Use Permit for
planned development to include office, retail and industrial for
proposed Treasure Valley Technical Center by Meridian Freeway
Associates and DBSllndustrial Limited Partnership - % mile east of
Linder Road, north side of Overland Road: . ..
ajJ}Jro~ tt//rlu <Y/-tLR ~odt'n'cQ./+rfrn-~
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: RZ 01-003 Request
for rezone from R-4 to C~C for Partition Specialties, Inc by Ronald
and Coleen Schaub -1315 North Meridian Road:
h.v /-e- ~ 7 ~ 2-1 f2::=- j1v~
Order to Remand to Planning and Zoning: AZ 00-019 Request
for Annexation and Zoning of 1 OO~ 71 acres from RUT -R-4 for
proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of
Meridian and Ustick Roads: ~fPY o~
B.
D.
E.
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19,. 200 I
Page I of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, Please contact the C jty Clerk's Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(~'.".:.... ..
('.-.-.
.1'",.1'.. . .. ..
F. Order of Remand to Planning and Zoning: PP 00-018 Request
for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots and 25 other lots
on 99.83 acres in an R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-
B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: apprvt/JC.-
G. Approve minutes of May 1, 2001, City Council Meeting: CiJ>r-Pv~
H. Approve minutes of May 23,2001, Special City Council Meeting: (tjJfJ171~
t Approve minutes of April 3, 2001, City Council Meeting: af17lQV..JL,.
J. Approve minutes of May 9,2001, Special City Council Meeting: ~C>VfL"
Department Reports:
fL, Ac 4.
r'bV f~1
A. Public Works Department - Gary Smith
~'
4.Y
5.'~
1 ~
Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Project - Change
Order No.1: ~Tt7f/e--
Agreement for Roadway ConstructionlWater and Sewer
Improvements - Locust Grove Road, Fairview to Ustick:
tJV?J:n19v~
Biosolids Dewatering Facility - Increase to Carolla
Engineers' Professional Services Agreement:
PifJpn9 v~
Ashford Greens Subdivision No. 5 - Storm Drainage
Easement: t:iYPt~ C
Standby Generators at Wells No~ 17 and No. 19 - Lease
Ag reeme nt: /t.;t9,1'f...1L
Diesel Delivery and Storage Trailer Unit - Lease Agreement: ~
2~
3.
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
6. Tabled from May 15,2001: FP 01-007 Final Plat approval of 36 building
lots and 2 other lots on 10~66 acres in an R-4 zone for Bear Creek
Subdivision No. by Briggs Engineering - east of Stoddard and south of
Overland Road: ~ole t~/.1 JU~ JI!!!- /WI-;-
7. Tabled from June 5, 2001: FP 01-009 Request for Final Plat approval of
13 building lots and 3 other lots on 6~36 acres for Meridian Green - Unit
No.4 by Fuller/Scott Investment Company and Glanco - east and west
sides of Southeast 5th Way south from Overland Road:
frP(~ ~~7 uaLfJ 3P3l.l1v~
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19,2001
Page 2 of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings,. please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
8.
e.,to
ytvOV -1! V~ 9.
t(tfP'V
10.
11.
12.
13.
~':~
('
14.
Tabled from June 5,2001: CUP 01-013 Request for a Conditional Use
Permit for the manufacturing of inflatable boats in an I-L zone for Elliott
Business Park by H2NR, LLC - east of Locust Grove and south of East
Wilson Lane: a Iv jYUo//cVLe -/fI: 1el-L rfiA- d/;>pn'Jtr~
Tabled from June 5,2001: CUP 01-010 Request for a Conditional Use
Permit for a free~standing coffee hut with a drive..thru in a proposed C-G
zone for proposed Moxie Java by T JBJ, Incp - 1975 East Fairview:
~-f~:f fa fhLP~V'-t- P(F-I e/~ .fin- ~/R-PYfP"-~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5,2001: AZ 00-023 Request for
annexation and zoning of 156.21 acres from RT to R4 for proposed
Tuscany Lakes Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership - south of
Victory Road and west of Eagle Road: .
a,,~~:J fo (chLf.CVtL Plf f e..U ~ ~~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 00-024 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 353 building lots and 39 other lots on 156.21
acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Tuscany Lakes Subdivision
by Gem Park II Partnership - south of Victory Road and we~t of Eagle
Road: ~ ~'1 Yo f>:'LP~ fl f <{ el.,( fdrv~/~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 00-052 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a planned residential
development in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Tuscany lakes
Subdivision by Gem Park 11 Partnership - south of Victory Road and west
of Eagle Road: a.-f'~1 t<o ~pClAL ~/11c1~ ~ ct~/~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5,2001: PP 01-008 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 1 building lot and 1 ACHD Park and Ride lot
on 6.36 acres in a C..G zone for proposed Travelers Corner by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc - southeast of Interstate 84 and Meridian Road:
a~1 -#? ;rne-p~ -rIP I e./L -fr;r-c&pprdvd
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: VAR 01-006 Request
for variance of the street length ending in a cul-de-sac from the maximum
length of 450 feet to an increased length of 495 feet for a proposed Park-
and-Ride Lot by W.H. Moore Company - northeast corner of Overland
and Meridian Roads: 6&-fm/l.L ~ 10 fhLfJCVLA: F/? t (] l,e Iiv ~J'l1rt;vd
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-014 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Christian Ministry for office space and
an Afte rcarerrransitiona I home for men, serving as a group-living
environment for 14 men and 1 live~in House Supervisor in an R-4 zone for
Whole Life Restoration House by B~A.S.LC. Outreach Ministries, Inc -
1304 West 1st Street: Ct;J??/-h'nuJL {VYv~ 7 ~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: RZ 01-004 Request for
a rezone of 8.29 acres from L~O to C-G for Waltman Court Subdivision
15.
16.
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19, 200 I
Page 3 of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings~ please contact the City Clerk~s Office at 888..
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
!~
~ .
\
....~:... ..
(" ..:
22.
by John Goade - south of Troutner Business Park, between Waltman
Lane and Ten Mile Road: r/ P J / r
a; fc jJ1LjJCvt-e IIr " e/~ "fCl-/ wppjt~~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 01-007 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 6 building lots and 1 other lot on 8.29 acres in
a proposed C-G zone for proposed Waltman Court Subdivision by John
and Sandra Goade - south of Troutner Business Parkt between Waltman
Lane and Ten Mile Road: /}/ I r _ ~~
?v-f,. (-0 ~p~ rl;:' ( e ~e .,-yv ~prv"
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: RZ 01-004 Request for
a rezone from an R-8 to L~O zone for Meridian Water Department by
Meridian Water Department - 2235 Northwest 8th Street:
at~~ fo ~p~ FI P f c/1 M Nn-rvV~
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: VAR 01-005 Request
for a variance of the rear property setback from 15 feet to 11.5 feet for
property to be used for single-family dwelling by John Flaherty
Construction, Inc. - 2421 East Weir Creek Drive:
a/7;7n'v...e- A/; ~Ma.W' -a..L ./t.2 f &t..eS ~ "0/ a;::Jpf. ~ c~
Public Hearing: PP 01-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 336
building lots and 58 other lots on 175.91 acres in proposed R-4 and C-G
zones for proposed Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision by Primeland
Development, Co. LLP - north of Ustick and east of Ten Mile Roads:
co-uh~ pilL To ;red, ?~ ~
Public Hearing: CUP 01-006 Request for Conditional Use Permit for
692 single*family lots, 59 townhomes, 17 office lots and 1 0 commercial
lots on 370.55 acres in proposed R-4 and C-G zones for proposed
Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision by Primeland Development, Co. LLP
- north of Ustick and east of Ten Mile Roads:
ci~-h }t ~ p / It- fv J" teL J 31J:i- ~t;r
Public Hearing: VAR 01-008 Request for variance for the reduction of
two required parking spaces for Moxie Java by T JBJ, Inc. - 1975 East
Fairview: d;(~3 fo ~F6~ ~/F {(t/~ h-v ~vaL
Public Hearing: VAR 01-007 Request for a variance to exceed the
maximum 1,000 foot block length for proposed Macaile Meadows
Subdivision by Hillview Land Development, LLC - south of Fairview
Avenue, north of Pine Street and % mile west of Cloverdale Road:
~-/JhuJL piA- to ~ Z7fr/~
Public Hearing: AZ 01-005 Request for annexation and zoning of 28.59
acres from RUT to R-8 for proposed Macaile Meadows Subdivision by
Hillview Land Development, LLC - south of Fairview and west of
Cloverdale Roads: I __ TL n 2]J;Z ~
Ccnvf>h~ pIlL Iv VV~ ,~ J
Public Hearing: PP 01-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 115
building lots and 15 other lots on 28.59 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
23.
24.
25.
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19, 200 I
Page 4 of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings" please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888..
4433 at least 48 hOUrs prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(
~
("
proposed Macaile Meadows Subdivision by Hillview Land Developmentl
LLC - south of Fairview and west of Cloverdale Roads:
COJ',.>fr'J-vtd- fJ IlL fo ~ z 1 e- -
26. FP 01-01 0 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 buil 1"9 lots and 4 other
lots on 5.17 acres in an R-4 zone for Devlin Place Subdivision No.2 by
J-U..B Engineers, Inc* - north of Cherry Lane and south of Devlin No.1:
~ov~ pvJ71vS
27. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
ap;un:>VR..- b -2<7-o( t 6 -27-tJ(
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19, 200 I
Page 5 of 5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings:t please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
{:..... .
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, June 19, 2001 at 6:30 p~m.
City Council Chambers
1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd X
X Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve with Amendments
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
AZ 01-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 4 acres from R-1
to C-C for proposed Hark's Corner by Van Haas Properties - 119
South Linder Road: Approve
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law for Approval:
CUP 01-011 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for commercial
development with fueling stations, drive-thru, coffee shop, carwash
and future retail in a proposed C-C zone for proposed Hark's
Corner by Van Hees Properties - 119 South Linder Road:
Approve
c. Tabled from June 5, 2001: Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law: CUP 01-009 Request for Conditional Use Permit for
planned development to include office, retail and industrial for
proposed Treasure Valley Technical Center by Meridian Freeway
Associates and DBSllndustrial Limited Partnership - % mile east of
Linder Road, north side of Overland Road: Move to 5-C
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law: RZ 01-003 Request
for rezone from R-4 to C-C for Partition Specialties, Jne by Ronald
and Coleen Schaub - 1315 North Meridian Road: Table to
6-27 -01
E. Order to Remand to Planning and Zoning: AZ 00-019 Request
for Annexation and Zoning of 100~71 acres from RUT-R-4 for
proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of
Meridian and Ustick Roads: Approve
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19, 200 I
Page I of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk~s Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs prior to the PUbliC meeting.
("
F. Order of Remand to Planning and Zoning: PP 00-018 Request
for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots and 25 other lots
on 99.83 acres in an R...4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-
B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads:
Approve
G. Approve minutes of May 1,2001, City Council Meeting: Approve
H; Approve minutes of May 23, 2001, Special City Council Meeting:
Approve
t Approve minutes of April 3,2001, City Council Meeting: Approve
J. Approve minutes of May 9, 2001, Special City Council Meeting:
Approve
4. Department Reports:
A. Public Works Department - Gary Smith
1 ~ Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Project - Change
Order No.1: Approve
2~ Agreement for Roadway ConstructionlWater and Sewer
Improvements - Locust Grove Road, Fairview to Ustick:
Approve
3. Biosolids Dewatering Facility - Increase to Carolla
Engineers' Professional Services Agreement: Approve
4~ Ashford Greens Subdivision No. 5 - Storm Drainage
Easement: Omit
5. Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19 - Lease
Agreement: Approve
6. Diesel Delivery and Storage Trailer Unit - Lease Agreement:
Approve
5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
c. Tabled from June 5, 2001: Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of law: CUP 01-009 Request for Conditional Use Permit for
planned development to include office, retail and industrial for
proposed Treasure Valley Technical Center by Meridian Freeway
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19, 2001
Page 2 of2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City ofMcridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities retated to documents and/or bearings, please contact the City Clerk'S Office at 888.
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
Associates and DBSllndustrial Limited Partnership - % mile east of
Linder Road, north side of Overland Road: Approve with Staff
Mod ifications
6. Tabled from May 15, 2001: FP 01-007 Final Plat approval of 36 building
lots and 2 other lots on 1 O~66 acres in an R-4 zone for Bear Creek
Subdivision No.2 by Briggs Engineering - east of Stoddard and south of
Overland Road: Table to 7-3-01
7. Tabled from June 5, 2001: FP 01-009 Request for Final Plat approval of
13 building lots and 3 other lots on 6~36 acres for Meridian Green - Unit
No.4 by Fuller/Scott Investment Company and Glenco - east and west
sides of Southeast 5th Way south from Overland Road: Table to 7-3...01
8. Tabled from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-013 Request for a Conditional Use
Permit for the manufacturing of inflatable boats in an I-L zone for Elliott
Business Park by H2NR, LLC - east of Locust Grove and south of East
Wilson Lane: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions
of Law for Approval
9. Tabled from June 5,2001: CUP 01-010 Request for a Conditional Use
Permit for a free-standing coffee hut with a drive-thru in a proposed C-G
zone for proposed Moxie Java by T JBJ, Inc. - 1975 East Fairview:
Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for
Approval
10. Continued Public Hearing from June 5,2001: AZ 00-023 Request for
annexation and zoning of 156~21 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed
Tuscany lakes Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership - south of
Victory Road and west of Eagle Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of
Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial
11. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 00-024 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 353 building lots and 39 other lots on .156~21
acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Tuscany Lakes Subdivision
by Gem Park II Partnership - south of Victory Road and west of Eagle
Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law
for Denial
12. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 00-052 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a planned residential
development in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Tuscany Lakes
Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership - south of Victory Road and west
of Eagle Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of law for Denial
Meridian City Council Agenda - June 19" 2001
Page 3 of3
AIl materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, Please contact the City Clerk)s Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(
13. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 01-008 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 1 building lot and 1 ACHD Park and Ride lot
on 6.36 acres in a C-G zone for proposed Travelers Corner by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc - southeast of Interstate 84 and Meridian Road: Attorney
to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law for Approval
14. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: VAR 01-006 Request
for variance of the street length ending in a cul-de~sac from the maximum
length of 450 feet to an increased length of 495 feet for a proposed Park-
and-Ride Lot by W.H. Moore Company - northeast corner of Overland
and Meridian Roads: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of law for Approval
15. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-014 Request
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Christian Ministry for office space and
an AftercareJTransitional home for men, serving as a group-living
environment for 14 men and 1 live-in House Supervisor in an R-4 zone for
Whole Life Restoration House by B.A.S.LC. Outreach Ministries, Inc -
1304 West 1st Street: Continue to 8-7-01 Meeting
16. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: RZ 01-004 Request for
a rezone of 8.29 acres from L-O to C-G for Waltman Court Subdivision
by John Goade - south of Troutner Business Park, between Waltman
Lane and Ten Mile Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
17. Continued Public Hearing from June 5,2001: PP 01-007 Request for
Preliminary Plat approval of 6 building lots and 1 other lot on 8~29 acres in
a proposed C-G zone for proposed Waltman Court Subdivision by John
and Sandra Goade - south of Troutner Business Park, between Waltman
Lane and Ten Mile Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law for Approval
18. Continued Public Hearing from June 5,2001: RZ 01-004 Request for
a rezone from an R-8 to L-Q zone for Meridian Water Department by
Meridian Water Department - 2235 Northwest 8th Street: Attorney to
Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval
19. Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: VAR 01-005 Request
for a variance of the rear property setback from 15 feet to 11.5 feet for
property to be used for single-family dwelling by John Flaherty
Construction, Inc. - 2421 East Weir Creek Drive: Approve
Withdrawal Request by Applicant
20. Public Hearing: PP 01-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 336
building lots and 58 other lots on 175~91 acres in proposed R~4 and C-G
Meridian City Council Agenda -June 19~ 2001
Page 4 of4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-
4433 at least 48 hOUrs Prior to the PUbliC meeting.
(
(~
(,.. .
zones for proposed Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision by Primeland
Development, Co. LLP - north of Ustick and east of Ten Mile Roads:
Continue to 7 ..3-01
21. Public Hearing: CUP 01-006 Request for Conditional Use Permit for
692 single-family lots, 59 town homes, 17 office lots and 1 0 commercial
lots on 370.55 acres in proposed R-4 and C,..G zones for proposed
Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision by Primeland Development, Co~ LLP
- north of Ustick and east of Ten Mile Roads: Continue to 7-3-01
22. Public Hearing: VAR 01-008 Request for variance for the reduction of
two required parking spaces for Moxie Java by T JBJ, Inc~ - 1975 East
Fairview: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of
Law for Approval
23. Public Hearing: VAR 01-007 Request for a variance to exceed the
maximum 1,000 foot block length for proposed Macaile Meadows
Subdivision by Hillview Land Development, LLC - south of Fairview
Avenue, north of Pine Street and % mile west of Cloverdale Road:
Continue to 6-27-01
24. Public Hearing: AZ 01~005 Request for annexation and zoning of 28.59
acres from RUT to R-8 for proposed Macaile Meadows Subdivision by
Hillview Land Development, LLC - south of Fairview and west of
Cloverdale Roads: Continue to 6-27 -01
25. Public Hearing: PP 01-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 115
building lots and 15 other lots on 28~59 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for
proposed Macaile Meadows Subdivision by Hillview Land Development,
LLC - south of Fairview and west of Cloverdale Roads: Continue to
6-27 -01
26. FP 01-010 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 building lots and 4 other
lots on 5~ 17 acres in an R-4 zone for Devlin Place Subdivision No. 2 by
J-U-B Engineers, Inc. - north of Cherry Lane and south of Devlin No~ 1:
Approve with Staff Comments
.
27. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve turn-off dates of
6-20-01 and 6-27 -01
Meridian City Council Agenda-June .19, 2001
Page 5 of5
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommOdation for disabilities related to documents andlorhearings, Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888w
4433 at least 48 hours prior to the PUbliC meeting.
('" ... .
(:
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19. 2001
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order
at 6:30 PwM on Tuesday June 19,2001 by Mayor Robert D. Corrie.
Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, Ron Anderson, Tammy de
Weerd and Cherie McCandless.
Others Present: Gary Smith
Corrie: Okay. Thank you for your patience~ I'm sorry we're getting started 15
minutes later tonight. I want to welcome everybody here. If you've got any cell
phones, I would appreciate it if you'd turn them off. I guess I'd better do mine too
hadnft I? This may seem, its going to be a little complicated, but we'll walk you
through it. We're going to get as much done tonight as we can on these Public
Hearings. What we don't get to, we're going to do them next week on
Wednesday night, the 27th. All non-land use items, such as final plats and that
nature, weJII do on the 26th. That's a regular meeting. We'll see where we are by
pretty close to 10:00~ Then those that we don't get to on the Public Hearings, we
will have them next week on the 28th and getting everything done this month.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: 27th, I can't get California out of my mind here. But the 27th. I'll kind of go
along and let you know where we are here. We figure that we want to get
everything out of here by this month because if we don't we just keep adding to
the next one and the next one. Pretty soon, we've got 50 Public Hearings in one
night and we never do get to them and they just keep dragging on~ We will try
that and see how it works. Mr9 Clerk would you have roll call please.
Item 1.
Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd X
X Cherie McCandless X
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Item 2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Okay. The next item is the adoption of the agenda. Council, we've been
requested by legal to table D. Mr. Nichols, would that be the 27th that you had
that down or the 3rd?
Nichols: Mayor, we can have it on the 27th.
Corrie: I would say then that legal would like to have it the 27th. We have a
request on department reports item No~ 4 Ashford Greens subdivision, No~ 5
storm drainage easement, Mr~ Smitht that one has been taken out, correct?
(.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 2
Okay. Item No.6, this is a final plat approval of Bear Creek. They have requested
that that be tabled until July the 3rd meeting. Item No~ 7 is Meridian Greens unit
No.4 and also has been requested to be tabled to July the 3rd. I think that's aiL
Unless the Council has-
Bird: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Number 9 moves to 22 A.
Corrie: Oh, that's right. Number 9, the request for Conditional Use Permit by
Moxie Java has been moved to 22A~ We need to do the variance before we do
the Conditional Use Permit. So, No~ 9 will be moved to 22. Anything else?
(inaudible discussion)
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Yes.
De Weerd: I believe 19 requested to be withdrawn.
Corrie: To be withdrawn?
Bird: Yes.
De Weerd: Taken off.
Bird: Do we have to do that?
Corrie: Let's see, that's a Public Hearing. We'll have to open it and close it, I
believe. Is that right, Mr~ Nichols? Is there anybody here for the Public Hearing
on the single family dwelling on No~ 19? It's a variancel yes. Okay.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, I would recommend, when you get to that item on the
agenda that you ask if there's anybody there to testify and announce at that time
that the matter has been withdrawn from consideration~
Corrie: Okay. Is there anything else that the Council has or the clerk has?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I would like to move department reports to the end of our agenda~
("
\
(:::.....:.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June I 9~ 200 I
Page 3
Corrie: All right Item No~ 4 will be moved to the last agenda right after water,
sewer and trash delinquencies. Shari.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor. Could item C of the consent agenda be moved to the regular
agenda?
Corrie: Item C?
Stiles: Yes.
Corrie: Okay.
Bird: Move that to 5-
Corrie: Move that one to 5-
Bird: 5C
Corrie: 5A?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: 5C. I'm sorry~
Bird: 5C.
Corrie: All right.
Stiles: Also, items 20 and 21 on the Bridgetower crossing subdivision, the
annexation and zoning has been put to the July 3rd meeting~ So, I don't know
whether you want to go ahead and hold those Public Hearings and table it or
continue it. I believe that the applicant's representative is not going to be present
tonight
Corrie: Will they be here the 27th?
De Weerd: No, July.
Stiles: Probably nota July grd is when the annexation is up for Public Hearing.
Corrie: Weil, if we keep this up, we'll be out of here by 8:00~
(inaudible discussion)
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor~
('
\~
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 4
Corrie: Mrs~ de Weerd~
De Weerd: I move that we approve the agenda with the following changes. To
move from the consent agenda 3C to 5e. To move department reports 4A to the
end of the agenda, so it would be item No. 28~ To move item 9 to follow item 22
as 22A. And all other actions will have to fall under their individual item.
Bird: Second.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Was there a second?
McCandless: What about D on the agenda?
(inaudible discussion)
McCandless: on the consent agenda?
De Weerd: We'll handle that under consent
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: There's been a motion to adopt the agenda~ Any further discussion? Roll
call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
Item 3.
Consent Agenda:
A. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
AZ 01-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 4 acres
from R-1 to C-C for proposed Hark's Corner by Van Hees
Properties - 119 South Linder Road:
B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
CUP 01-011 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for
commercial development with fueling stations, drive-thru,
coffee shop, car wash and future retail in a proposed eRe
zone for proposed Hark's Corner by Van Hees Properties -
119 South Linder Road:
c. Tabled from June 5, 2001: Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of law: CUP 01-009 Request for Conditional
Use Permit for planned development to include office, retail
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 5
c..
and industrial for proposed Treasure Valley Technical
Center by Meridian Freeway Associates and DBSllndustrial
Limited Partnership - % mile east of Linder Road, north side
of Overland Road:
D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law: RZ 01-003
Request for rezone from R-4 to e-G for Partition
Specialties, Inc by Ronald and Coleen Schaub - 1315
North Meridian Road:
E. Order to Remand to Planning and Zoning: AZ 00-019
Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from
RUT-R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers,
Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads:
F. Order of Remand to Planning and Zoning: PP 00-018
Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots
and 25 other lots on 99~83 acres in an R-4 zone for
proposed Cedar Springs by J-U~B Engineers, Inc -
northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads:
G. Approve minutes of May 1,2001, City Council Meeting:
H~ Approve minutes of May 23, 2001, Special City Council
Meeting:
t Approve minutes of April 3,2001, City Council Meeting:
J~ Approve minutes of May 9, 2001, Special City Council
Meeti ng:
Corrie: We will go now to item 5C-
Bird: No.
De Weerd: Three~
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: oh, that's right. We've got to do the consent agenda. All right,
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 6
Bird: I would move that we approve the consent agenda with the exception of
item D being tabled until June 27, 2001 and the rest remain as shown.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to approve the consent agenda with
the correction of item D to be moved to the 27th of this month. Any further
discussion? Roll call vote Mr. Berg~
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 5.
(Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
c.
Tabled from June 5,2001: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law: CUP 01-009 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned
development to include office, retail and industrial for proposed
Treasure Valley Technical Center by Meridian Freeway
Associates and DBSllndustrial Limited Partnership - % mile east of
Linder Road, north side of Overland Road:
Corrie: Now (inaudible). 5C which is tabled from the June 5, 2001 Findings of
Facts and Conclusions of Law. It's a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
planned development to include office, retail and industrial for proposed Treasure
Valley Technical Center by Meridian Freeway Associates and DBSI Industrial
Limited Partnership.
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and CounciL Did you get the memo dated today regarding the
changes to the findings? I met with Dan Bradshaw9 Bruce Freckleton and I met
with Dan Bradshaw this morning9 As you may recall, at the last meeting, Mr.
Bradshaw had submitted a position statement and we weren't quite in agreement
on the way he had worded some of those items in the position statement. So, we
met today and came to an agreement on rewording some of those~ I can go over
those in detail or not. I did want to ask for your recollection, when they came
through with this Conditional Use Permit, this is the site out where Western
Electronics and DBSI currently is. My recollection was they were approved for
the light industrial uses that were already. It's already zoned light industrial and
that they would be permitted to do light industrial projects without coming back
through the Conditional Use process. But if they wanted to do the non-
conforming uses of office, retail or day care, then they would come back through
the Conditional Use process. If Itm wrong on that --. That's what I recall. If that's
not correct, --
Corrie: Council~
(:.....
(;
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 7
Bird: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I agree with SharL That's how I recall that it was presented. What it's zoned
for is no problem but outside of that zonef then they come back for a Conditional
Use Permit.
Stiles: Okay.
Bird: That was my understanding.
Stiles: That was how this has been written then.
Corrie: Any other, Council?
Stiles: Okay. Thank you. I would ask that you approve those findings with the
modifications noted in my memo dated June 19, 2001 ~
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs~ de Weerd.
De Weerd: I move that we approve the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of
Law on RZ 01-003, request for rezone to include all staff comments in the
memorandum dated June 19th.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to approve the Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law with the modifications that was approved on the (inaudible).
Any further discussion? Mr. Berg roll call vote please.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 6.
Tabled from May 15, 2001: FP 01-007 Final Plat approval of 36
building lots and 2 other lots on 10~66 acres in an R-4 zone for
Bear Creek Subdivision No.2 by Briggs Engineering - east of
Stoddard and south of Overland Road:
Corrie: Item N09 6 is a final plat for Bear Creek subdivision~ That has been
requested by the applicant to have that tabled until July 3rd.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
(.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 1
Page 8
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we table the Final Plat for Bear Creek subdivision until July 3,
2001 ~
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to table the Final Plat 01-007 to July 31
2001. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those say aye in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 7.
Tabled from June 5, 2001: FP 01-009 Request for Final Plat
approval of 13 building lots and 3 other lots on 6.36 acres for
Meridian Green - Unit No.4 by Fuller/Scott Investment Company
and Glenco - east and west sides of Southeast 5th Way south from
Overland Road:
Corrie: Item No~ 7 is a request for Final Plat approval of Meridian Green Unit No.
4. They also requested that be tabled to July 3, 2001.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Anderson~
Anderson: I would move that we table this request for Final Plat approval for
Meridian Green Unit No.4 until July 3.
Bird: Second~
Corrie: Motion made and second to table item No.7 final plat No~ 01-009 until
July 3, 2001 ~ Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 8.
Tabled from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-013 Request for a
Conditional Use Permit for the manufacturing of inflatable boats in
an I-L zone for Elliott Business Park by H2NR, LLC - east of
Locust Grove and south of East Wilson Lane:
Corrie: Item No. 8 is a Conditional Use Permit No. 01-013 request for a
Conditional Use Permit for the manufacturing of inflatable boats in an I-L zone for
Elliott Business Park by H2NR, LLC east of Locust Grove and south of East
Wilson Lane. Staff comments first.
('.p,.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19) 200 I
Page 9
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. This is for the remaining lot in the Elliott Business
Park. Butte Fence is occupying the lot that's immediately adjacent to Wilson
Lane, which would be south of 0&8, Econo-Lube, and those businesses along
Fairview on Wilson lane. They are proposing to have a manufacturing facility for
their inflatable boats. They would have a pond to demonstrate their products~
They will also be allowing for the future pathway along the Jackson stub drain in
this location. They will be tiling the other ditch that runs through the property. This
is the building elevations. We would recommend approval of the application with
all staff and agency conditions.
Corrie: Council, do you have any questions of staff at this point? Is the
representative from Elliott Business Park here tonight? Would you come up? I
have a question for you. Have you had a chance to read the recommendations of
the Planning and Zoning -
Lamb: Yes, I have~
Corrie: Is there anything that you don't agree with?
lamb: We did make a request to go to a smaller diameter of tree because we're
going to put more trees than required by law in along the east side of the
property~ To go to a 3 inch instead of a 4 inch, is that correct? Oh, 2 inch instead
of a 3 inch -
Corrie: Go to a 2 rather than a 3?
Lamb: Yeah. That was the only thing that we requested since we were going to
put 30 percent more trees in than what's required.
Bird: Mr~ Mayor. Could we get his name?
Corrie: I'm sorry.. Your name please?
Lamb: My name is Greg Lamb~
Corrie: I know you but they may not. All right~ Anything else?
lamb: No. Everything looked really acceptable to me.
Corrie: Council, do you have any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay. WeJII see what happens here. Thank you.
Bird: Mr.. Mayor.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June] 9, 200 I
Page I 0
( .
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I have a question of Shari then. Would the going from a 3 to 2 inch, even
though theyJre doing more, is that acceptable to you?
Stiles: Yes. That would be in accordance with our new landscape ordinance.
Bird: That's what I thought
Corrie: Any other discussion?
Bird: I have none.
Anderson: Mr~ Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: I had a question of Kenny~ Kenny have your concerns for the fire
department that you had addressed on this been addressed?
Bowman: Mayor Corrie, City Council Members, Councilman Ron Anderson~ Yes.
They have. We've talked with the gentleman several times on the product that
he's going to have in there. It was a little surprise to me when Shari said there
was a pond back there. I thought maybe that might be a swale or something like
some subdivisions. That might be a little concern if people get back there and
start playing around in that pond. Building wise, the water supply, the sprinkler
systems, everything else he has met with us and discussed with us Ron.
Anderson: Okay, thank you.
Corrie: Any further discussion?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Hearing no other discussion, I'll entertain a motion on the request for a
Conditional Use Permit~
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mr~ Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the Conditional Use Permit for the manufacturing of
inflatable boats in an I-L zone for Elliott Business Park by H2NR LLC east of
(... .
(-.~^:. .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 36
Anderson: Mr.. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr9 Anderson~
Anderson: I would make a motion that we deny the request for a Conditional
Use Permit to construct a planned residential development in a proposed R-4
zone for proposed Tuscany Lakes subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership and
instruct the city Attorney to draw up the appropriate Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to deny the CUP for item CUP 00-052
and for the Attorney to draw up the proper Findings of Facts and Conclusions of
Law. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say
aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I have a question for the attorney. Did we give enough reasons for
the denial, to put into the findings?
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Councilwoman de WeerdJ I
believe so. The annexation and zoning is a legislative act. I will put down the
reasons espoused by Councilman Anderson as a reason for that. Then on the
other 2, because the propertyJs not annexed! that would be the reason cited for
not approving the Preliminary Plat or the Conditional Use Permit~ There's a way I
would word the findings.
De Weerd: Could any comments brought up after the Public Hearing was
closed, be included in those findings? To address all those different issues -
Nichols: That's not public testimony. That was just discussion by the Council, so
that's appropriate.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess I am concerned that this application might go to the county
so I want to make sure that the reasons for our denial are clear.
.....
{ .
t., .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 37
Nichols: CouncilWoman de Weerd, Mayort Members of the CounciL I will make
them as clear as I perceive the motion to be. There are separate issues~ If the
application goes to the county. If the application goes to the county, it would not
be connected to city sewer and it would have a different proposal for water.
Item 13.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001 : PP 01-008
Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 1 building lot and 1 ACHD
Park and Ride lot on 6.36 acres in a C-G zone for proposed
Travelers Corner by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc - southeast of
Interstate 84 and Meridian Road:
Item 14.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: VAR 01-006
Request for variance of the street length ending in a cul-de-sac
from the maximum length of 450 feet to an increased length of 495
feet for a proposed Park-and-Ride lot by W~H~ Moore Company-
northeast corner of Overland and Meridian Roads:
Corrie: Item No~ 13 is the continued Public Hearing from June the 5th. This is a
request for Preliminary Plat approval of 1 building lot and 1 ACHD park and ride
lot on 6.36 acres in a C-G zone for proposed Traveler's Corner by Pinnacle
Engineers, Inc. southeast of interstate 84 and Meridian Road~ At this time I will
continue the Public Hearing and have staff comments first.
Stiles: In the beginning, I was wondering if we could address the variance
before we act on the plat? Or go with item 14 on the variance where the cui de
sac linked before the plat~ Either that or address both of them together~
Corrie: Oh, well we can open them together. Mr. Nichols is that all right? We
need to take the variance before we do the Conditional Use Permit, correct?
Stiles: Before the plat.
Nichols: Before the Preliminary Plat, Mayor I would recommend that we open
both Public Hearings and include the testimony on both items~
Corrie: Okay. I also will continue the Public Hearing on the request for variance
on the street length in the cui de sac from the maximum length of 450 feet to the
increased length of 495 feet for a park and ride lot by W. H. Moore company~ We
will give testimony on both the request for Preliminary Plat and on the variance at
this point. Shari, thank you.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council. This is for the property that has been previously
been before you for the Ada County Highway District park and ride lot. It's just
west of Meridian Ford. This would be Meridian Ford here~ This is existing
property in Ada County. It has a dwelling and some out buildings on it~ They don't
{ .
\:..
(. .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 11
Locust Grove and south of Wilson Lane with staff comments and for the attorney
to draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order.
McCandless: Second~
Corrie: MotionJs been made and second to approve the request for Conditional
Use Permit 013 and for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law with the approval and with the 2 inch caliber trees as welL
Any further discussion? Roll call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Councilwoman de Weerd mentioned that somebody from the
Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision came in. Are they here tonight? Did they come
in? What we are going to do, and they requested that that be moved to the July
3rd meeting. That's the first Tuesday of July~ We will open the Public Hearing and
then we will continue that Public Hearing until that time. You still have a right if
you want to give public testimony tonight~ But it would be the same thing you'd
want to give the 3m when the rest of them come in.
Unidentified: So, if we don't give public testimony tonight, we still can (inaudible)?
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: AZ 00-023
Request for annexation and zoning of 156.21 acres from RT to R..4
for proposed Tuscany Lakes Subdivision by Gem Park II
Partnership - south of Victory Road and west of Eagle Road:
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 00-024
Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 353 building lots and 39
other lots on 156.21 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
Tuscany lakes Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership - south
of Victory Road and west of Eagle Road:
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 00-052
Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a planned
residential development in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed
Tuscany lakes Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership - south
of Victory Road and west of Eagle Road:
Corrie: Absolutely right~ That's when we recommend that you do it, at that time.
Thank you. Okay~ Item No.9 has been moved to 22 and next is the continued
Public Hearing item No. 10, 11 t and 12~ This is all a request for annexation,
request for Preliminary Plat, and request for a Conditional Use Permit. All on
Item 1 O.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 12
c...':.;. .
c.::.:.....::
Tuscany Lakes subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership. At t his time I will
continue the Public Hearing on all 3 items. We'll ask for discussion first~ City
Council, do you have any discussions on this that you'd like to do at this time, or
staff?
Bird: I have none Mayor~
Corrie: Kent, do you want to hold off and see where we are here and what we're
going to be doing? Hearing that then we will have staff comments first We tabled
this before -
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. I believe it was tabled due to the fact there were
some changes needing to be made to the recommendations from the Planning
and Zoning Commission~ You had position statements submitted from my
department and also from Kent Brown but you only received them on the day of
the meeting and didn't have time to look over those position statements. I don't
know if Mr~ Nichols has anything additional to submit~
Nichols: Mr~ Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Members of the CounciL Until we have the, and we don't have the
minutes of that meeting, I can't monkey with the recommendations unless I can
see from the minutes that the lawyer that prepared them was clearly wrong.
Certainly that's the reason for having the position statements. So the staff and
the applicant and any interested party can set forth what they believe the
recommendation actually was and what those points are so that Council can go
forward.
Corrie: Mr. Brown, is that okay with you?
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs~ de Weerd.
De Weerd: So, the recommendation is to go ahead and proceed on the
application? Okay ~
Stiles: Okay.
Corrie: You've got it Shari.
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. This is for the property located south of Victory
Road~ It would be contiguous with Thousand Springs subdivision. This is the
Ridenbaugh canal that comes through here. They have a proposed school site
(n..... .'
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page ) 3
here~ This would be their entrance into the school site~ I really don't have
anything to add to the last time when we had our meeting. But, Mr~ Brown is here
and available to make any additional presentation and answer any questions you
may hav~. Thanks~
(inaudible discussion)
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I would like to disclose I had a conversation with Wendel Bingham
with the school district today regarding the concerns that Council expressed at
the initial meeting and also a staff concern. The conversation was about how
boxed in that school site is and some of the safety issues with boxing that in. He
said that his preference would be that they have at least one side open in front of
the schooL It is a recommendation to have staff (inaudible) the Mayor, myself, a
board trustee member, the super and our parks director, public works, planning,
and the whole room if you want to, to get together to discuss some of the issues
of site planning and some other concerns that are coming up right now~ So, I just
wanted to disclose that before we got into the Public Hearing~
Brown: My name's Kent Brown, Briggs Engineering 1800 west Overland Road~
Briefly to go over our site and our project We have frontage out here on Locust
Grove. We have some natural waterways and manmade waterways that intersect
the overall property. As we travel east off of Locust Grove, we have the Ten Mile
Creek that runs through here. Then we have separate ownership by Nampa
Meridian of the Eight Mile. Then we have the Ridenbaugh CanaL We own to the
center line except for a small little place right here that the (inaudible) own. We
are proposing for the entire site to (inaudible) all of the ditches and canals, per
Meridian's code~ My client would like, if possible he would like to use over in this
area on the western half for those people that can't see. He wants to use wrought
iron except for the one property owner to the north of us on Locust Grove. On the
one property to the south of us. He's discussed with them putting in a vinyl fence~
The way that we've designed this overall project, and I think it was mentioned in
the record last time~ The Ten Mile has some physical restraints in becoming the
pathway that is called out in the Comprehensive Plan~ Nampa Meridian owns
property to the south of us and they have a - actually, the Ten Mile goes
underneath the Ridenbaugh Canal and they pull water out of the Ridenbaugh
and supplement the Ten Mile at that location~ I think that physically that's going to
make it difficult for a pathway continuing on south of here. With that concern in
mind, we have a pathway that we would have with our open space that would
create a walking pathway that the neighbors could use until such time as the
parks department was able to do something with the remainder. The way that the
condition was written by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
recommendation from staff and the parks departments request is that they take
( ...
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19; 200 1
Page 14
over the maintenance of the pathway that is in the Ten Mile. ButJ the
Homeowners Association maintain the vegetation and so forth that are in the Ten
Mile. We have a lot of high ground water~ The Ridenbaugh Canalleaks~ We are
therefor proposing to put these ponds in. The water would be - the Ridenbaugh
Canal bi-sects our property here but then continues south and comes down like
this. Our property here is adjacent to the Ridenbaugh~ So, there in these
locations we'd have to fence access to the Ridenbaugh but we would have an
open space and we would landscape, have a meandering pathway that would go
along the Eight Mile but outside of the Eight Mile right-af-way so that we don't
have to work with a ditch company with regards to that area. Have the water be
collected here in the pond, run through, come out this way and then dump back
into the Ten Mile. What's happening right now is the water comes from this point]
comes across and goes to the Ten Mile as it leaks out of the Ridenbaugh. The
ground typically is just a sandy cobbely rock. It would make a great gravel pit. If
you look at the southwest corner of Eagle and Victory you can see that was what
they had done in that location at one time~ As we did our test holes on the site]
we found that at this certain depth, and we had a hydrologist and there's a report
that's in the packet that talks about the water. What we are proposing to do is put
a cut off trench here when we get water that comes from the Mortener farm, run it
over to this point and either go under the Eight Mile to dump it back into here and
then have it go to the Ten Mile and pick up that water as it comes across~ This
water here would be picked up and taken over and dropped. Just one of the
things from an engineering standpoint that we think that'll happen is that when
we put the water and sewer in which is typically what happened on a project that
we did to the north of Victory in the Sherbrooke area. It was wet and when we put
the sewers in, the bedding the sewers, that's where the water ended up going
and the water table dropped~ We think that that has a possibility of happening
too. Either way, if we have to fill the site or if it's de-watered from these ponds~
What we're doing realistically is we're taking something that's a natural detriment
to the property~ It doesn't make it that great a farm ground because it's wet~
Testimony from the Morteners. They've talked about that they've had cattle on
here. It would probably make a great pasture and they don't have to water it~ But]
we'll de-water it or we'll raise it up~ We'll meet the requirements of the public
works department and their separation. We will cross the Ridenbaugh at this
location with a bridge. In our Planning and Zoning hearing staff stated concern
about this area being a wetlands~ Prior to our final hearing I met with the Army
Corp of Engineers. We went out to the site. HE stated that the only place that
there is a concern is when we cross the Ten Mile. At that location we have to
adhere to their standards. If we were doing more in the Ten Mile then we would
have to be concerned like Butch Otter and others about messing with the wetland
areas~ We're proposing to fence the entire east side of the Ridenbaugh Canal
and separate that with a chain link fence from the homes that are there. There
has been some discussion at previous meetings at P&Z and also at our last
hearing before you about the alignment of the road. We've met with the Highway
District on numerous occasions and there's at least a couple letters in .the file that
speak to the point that the Highway District wants us to put this at this location. It
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 15
was either in January or in December, the Highway District approved our plat and
the locations of our streets and stubs. They approve the location that we
currently have. Mr. Young had stated the concern that when the roads widen,
there's headlights on him. If we need to, I think that we could move the road. We
have a 3D-foot landscaping there. It would just clip one of his windows slightly in
my opinion. So, if we move the road to the east a little bit I don't see that he
would have any problem~ I met today with Wendel Bingham on the school site~
HE talked about Councilman de Weerd's comments. What he stated to me is that
he would like to have the ability to be able to, and this is the same comment he
made in P&Z is that if needed that we could be flexible with our site here to give
him 2 entrances. We combined the 2 that we have here with the existing one that
we have~ The copy of the plat that you have and at the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission we moved this stub here down in this location~
Then he asked that we have a pedestrian path to the Goldsmith's property to the
east of us. He asked that wherever we have our street location that we have a
stub to the property to the east of us so that these students that would come from
this 40 acres here would have the ability from a micropath to come right to the
front of the school. He did talk about that if we maybe look at opening up this
part~ But, that was, he would like to be able to know when this phase finally
comes on and whatever school plan that they're at the time that we have the
ability to work with them on how that school locates and how the traffic patterns
would work for that school site~ We have a diversity of lots and we're looking for
very nice homes over here next to the water amenities9 I feel that those, that
that's the market that we're shooting for here~ We have a few smaller homes in
this location. I've color coded that for you. These lots in this area are over 10,000
square feet, up to 12,000 square feet. The blues are the 9,000 square foot lots~
The 8s are under the 9,000. Then we have a couple of 7,000 here. But, overall
we have a large lot concept. The conditional use, we're asking for some flexibility
so that we're not all 80 by 100s. We have some 70-foot widths and then we have
a lot more in depth. These lots in this area are 120 feet deep backing up to where
the fenced area of the Ridenbaugh Canal is~ Where we cross here with the
Ridenbaugh, we would have to fence that~ The ditch company has a road on
either side. We would have to work with the fence company so that there would
be gates in those locations but there would be no access from our project to any
of these major waterways. We would fence both sides of the Eight Mile~ The Ten
Mile would be left open per your Comprehensive Plan. We've worked with the
pUblic works department with sewer and water issues. They, as a part of their
master plan needed the sewers to be stubbed at this location to continue on
going to the east. They basically needed it somewhere in here where the
diversion is so we're proposing to put it here. There's a report in there from, I
think it's from Brad that speaks to this would be adequate. There's some minor
changes. Pipe size and those kinds of things. Those are things that we would
work out during construction. Overall, we feel we have a very nice project Minor
modifications that we have made. We have an emergency access that would put
a non-build agreement on this lot until some time as we would have some
/.
(,., ...
(: .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 J
Page 16
secondary access. So, there are things that we worked out with the fire
department. Are there any questions?
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: What's the phasing of the project, Kent?
Brown: It starts over on this side~ Starts here, here, back and forth. My client has
told me that we probably will come in with his whole portion to pay for the off-site
sewer and water initially~ But, we would work our way this way going to the east
and we also discussed that with Wendel Bingham again today~ That if there was
a need for the school site sooner that we wo.uld accelerate that (inaudible).
Thafs the phasing plan that's on the Preliminary Plats that you have~
Anderson: What's this little thin narrow stuff that's going out --?
Brown: It's a 30 foot piece of property that we currently own. The Highway
District has asked us and we don't have any access to it~ There's a ditch located
in that area. If you were to drive out to the site, it's like a road for the sod farm
right now~ (inaudible) So, we're using it as an open area.
Anderson: How many feet of the upper northeast part is actually contiguous to
the city limits? It doesn't look like very much~ Like 2 or 3 lots is all.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Any other questions?
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird~
Bird: KentJ before we start any phase or anything, all that fencing around the
whole property would be in place. Am I not right? On the ditches and everything
would be in place. All the perimeter fencing and the ditches fencing and
everything.
Brown: Your code requirements requires to fence each phase~ For example, they
can't cross the Ten Mile so they're kind of stuck on one side. We fence our
perimeter there~ Are you asking if weJre going to phase the entire 153 acres?
Bird: I know youJre going to phase it. I think the biggest -I know that Ridenbaugh
is not going to be until probably the third, second phase and you're moving
people into the other area, building in there. I would hope that that Ridenbaugh
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 2001
Page 17
would be fenced before too many - it would be my preference before anybody
moved in there or any building permits were issued.
Brown: So, as we look at phase 1, weJre no where near the Ridenbaugh and
there's no way basically to get across into this undeveloped portion between the
Ten Mile and the Eight Mile. As soon as we go into this area, we would need to
fence from our farmers that are using the property to the north of us and we
would need to fence here along the Ridenbaugh. Then we would be fencing
along the Eight Mile in these locations. Once again, we have a-
Bird: Where are you going to pick the sewer up at?
Brown: The sewer is back on Locust Grove.
Bird: And bring it across?
Brown: It comes from this way.
Bird: Then you're going to stub it out down here and over here for us?
Brown: Yes~ Obviously when we move into this portion again, farmers and
fencing the Ridenbaugh as it comes through this location. And fencing the back
side of the Eight Mile.
Bird: What is your expectations of your build out and time on these phases? Is it
5, 7, 10 year project?
Brown: Yes. It's like a 7 to 10 year project depending on how the market stays.
Bird: You're not going to cut any of the roads, not even cut any roads in at all
other than the other phases? You're just going to do it as you go through that
certain phase?
Brown: Right. One of the things that we might do is in ability to determine the
groundwater go in and cut this out so that we can make sure that you know then
be able to prove to the public works department what the water depth in that area
is. We have no intention on punching the sewer through our project at one time,
at the beginning. The only thing that would make that or accelerate that is that if
for example the school would need to go. In my discussion with the school district
and Wendel Bingham they said the next school in this area would be the Pepper
Hills School. It's a site that they've already purchased.
Bird: So, in other words. there's not going to be any utility work or anything
except done in phases?
Brown: Right. We're bringing the water and sewer from this side.
i
\::...
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 18
Bird: So, basically the rest of it just stays like it is out there now?
Brown: Right. IF there was a need for, in my opinion the Homeowners
Association or the developer becomes the ones liable. If we needed to we could
put construction fencing up there on a temporary basis~ Butt as soon as we get
this excavated out, basically the only thing that we have in there. Because we
don't have sewer and water in those areas, is landscaping. We would want to
fence that.
***End of Side One***
Bird: As long as you're not going to punch and have roads, even thought they're
construction roads and stuff. I have no problem with that if you're just going to be
doing it in phases and not cutting in utilities or anything else, just leaving it like it
is.
Brown. You know, and depending on what the Highway District would require-
Bird: Yeah~ That's another thing.
Brown: I mean we might have to stub the bridge and if we needed to fence that, I
totally understand that
Bird: Okay. Thanks, Kent.
Corrie: Any other questions?
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor~
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: In the file it has a letter in there from Idaho Power that says they
can't provide power to that area.
Brown: (inaudible) September of this year is what the letter said~
De Weerd: Then they could do the whole thing?
Brown: The letter doesn't lead you to believe any otherwise but, my discussions
with Idaho Power today. They told us that they would have the ability for us to
have power at least for the first 2 or 3 phases without any changes to substations
or anything else. Power is an issue with Idaho Power throughout the whole
valley. They're getting substations approved. Meridian is one of the areas that
they need those.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 19
Corrie: Okay~ Any other comments, questions? Okay. Thank you Kent.
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd~
De Weerd: I do have a question for Gary. Was a water analysis done? And
have the pressure issues been resolved?
Smith: IJm not sure, Council Member de Weerd. I donJt recall what the results
were of the water model. It seems like we didnJt have an issue with the lower
portion of Tuscany, off of Locust Grove over toward Ridenbaugh. After we get
into the area above Ridenbaugh and going up north and eastr then we have a
pressure issue that would most probably requires the pump station to be installed
in Thousand Springs.
De Weerd: What is the time frame on that?
Smith: The pump station? We don't have a time frame for that right now.
De Weerd: Thanks, I think.
Corrie: Any other questions for staff? This is a continued Public Hearing. Is
there anyone here that wants to testify for the project? Okay~ We have 3 signed
here against the project. The first one is Herman Pullman.
Pullman: Mr. Mayor~ Herman Pullman. I live at 4010 south Locust Grove Road.
My biggest thing I have against, of course this subdivision, is that we've lived
there for 30 years. Some of our house is on the southwest corner on Locust
Grove. It's going to totally destroy our quality of life as far as we have to see it
now because of the solitude, the view and so on~ Another concern I have is, of
course, the water table. That's a very high water table there and I hope that the
design that they come up with, that it alleviates those problems. Otherwise it's
going to continue. I'm not an engineer so I don't have any way of knowing how to
do that but it is definitely a problem~ Also, the increased traffic. The City of
Meridian all we hear is problems with the fire department, the city police1 the
manning, so on. I don't see how building more subdivisions helps alleviate that
problem. I think it's really a situation where, possibly the people, you as a Council
need to, I'm not trying to tell you what to do but you need to really seriously
consider anymore subdivisions until you do get some of the problems taken care
of that we hear about continually through the news media~ That's alii have.
Corrie: Okay. (inaudible) Rex Young?
Young: My name is Rex Young. I live at 2950 east Victory Road, Meridian~ I've
been before you folks before and I don't want to cover a lot of the same ground
{.
{'.... .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 20
that did last time but there are some things that I want to talk about concerning
those issues. The first item that I wanted to mention~ This was discussed during
the Planning and Zoning and I didn't hear it discussed by Mr~ Brown tonight. It's
my understanding that they're going to berm along Victory Road~ I live just across
the road from the proposed subdivision to the north and kind of the east side of
them. There was discussion during Planning and Zoning that they would berm all
along Victory Road, but I didnJt hear you mention that tonight. I wanted to make
sure that we got that on the record. I do not, well, I prefer the subdivision didn't
go in, but I don't really object to the annexation. I don't abject to the zoning. The
plat is where I had the problem. Primarily with that roadway that exits the
subdivision to the north on Victory~ They say a picture is worth a thousand words.
I brought a picture with me tonight. I'd like to show this to you~ This is a picture of
my property. It's an aerial photo. The top of the picture is north. Here's Victory
Road, running here. You see this, I have this hedge along here that shields me
from the roadway. That roadway that exits the subdivision to the north is 3 paces
to the east of that shot. You can understand the relationship of this picture why I
object to that exit at that particular place.
(inaudible discussion)
Young: These are the windows that we're talking about that I have concerns
about With the vehicle exiting that. After Victory is widened and I lose that
hedge, these are the windows right here from car lights that flash onto
(inaudible) .
Brown: Is that your dining room?
Young: That is the kitchen dining area. Now, as I indicated sometimes common
sense ought to prevail. I propose that, that exit be moved to the west so that it
lines up with the exit from Thousand Springs which is Brandy's JeweL The
school, when they met with, -- when a representative met during Planning and
Zoning they were concerned about having a direct walkway from Thousand
Springs to get down to the school site. If that was redesigned so that that exit
lined up with Brandy's Jewel, that would resolve that. It would give them a good
direct route to the school site. If it's left where it's out, it will increase the walking
distance each day for the children that walk by about a quarter of a mile. Met with
Ada County Highway District, with Mr~ Brown one day and we talked about that
alignment~ They indicated by letter that they would approve, or that's the way I
understood itJ they would approve relocating that exit so that it lined up with
Brandy's Jewel. However they did put the stipulation in there that if there was a
pedestrian crossing put in there to support the school, that they would have to
move that pedestrian crossing to the top of the, kind of the crest of the hill. I went
down and walked that today from the sidewalk that exits Thousand Springs, it's 9
paces to the crest of that hill where that pedestrian walkway would be relocated
to which is really not very far. So, it just makes sense to me to align that. At
sometime or another, they're going to have to put a traffic light in there. You're
{ . ..
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 21
going to end up with one traffic light that takes up 2 exits and take care of a
pedestrian crossing~ To me it just makes sense. Anybody have any questions of
me?
Corrie: (inaudible) we're suppose to take that picture as evidence to keep,
(i naud ible ) ~
Young: I can take it in and make a copy of it~
Corrie: Thank you~
Bird: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Yes, Mr. Bird?
Bird: I do have one question while Mr. Young is up here, not for Mr. Young but for
the City Clerk~ We got a letter from them~ It wasn't stamped. Did you guys get it
or did it come direct to us? Do you have it entered into the record? Dated June
2nd~
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: Did you get one, Mayor?
Anderson: I know it wasn't in an envelope because it's not folded.
Bird: SeeJ it wasnJt folded. I can't remember if Mr. Young gave it to us at the
meeting, the last meeting~ I don't believe SO~ I believe it was in our boxes but it
wasn't stamped. That's why I was wondering if it had come through the City
Clerk's office.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: Yeah, and there's an attachment that went to the Planning and Zoning
(inaudible)~ You do have it? That's good.
Young: That particular letter~ I wasn't sure if I was going to be here last time and I
brought 9 copies of thatJ I actually brought 12 copies into the City Clerk's office
before we had the last hearing on it and gave those to them.
Bird: I just wanted to make sure it was in public because usually the City Clerk,
when they receive it will stamp it and then we know it's been through (inaudible).
Corrie: Mary, I'm sorry~ D, something and I couldn't quite read it out but if you
would give us-
(,
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 22
DeChambeau: My last name?
Corrie: Yes.
DeChambeau: DeChambeau.
Corrie: DeChambeau. Well, I thought it was that.
DeChambeau: We go by the Mortener name also~ Obviously, I am the youngest
daughter of Marlene Mortener~ I am here to. represent her. Unfortunately for the
developer, she is still alive and well, trying to be anyway. I just have so many
concerns. Just so many concerns about this subdivision~ First of all, my one
statement is that I'm not against development but I think at this time, this is not
the time for this development in this area. I think it's time for Meridian to slow
down and take a good look at how we're rushing this stuff in. They say they're
legal because it touches the other subdivision. Well, my farm is legal because it
touches other farms. I mean how do you justify that kind of reasoning. We have
been farming it for close to 70 years~ My family has been there. You know, we've
been here supporting this community. You guys forget that the farmers supported
Meridian and built it up a long time~ You know, Don Storey's business, the
Zamzow's. You know, all the little businesses that have been here for a long,
long time. My concern is a lot of, like I said before, I guess I haven't for you folks
but I already have problems with people walking up and down that canal. It's an
ongoing daily problem~ The family's very concerned about someone falling in.
We're liable~ I think you realize that we pay the taxes on the canal but it's an
easement for the Irrigation District I think a lot of people don't realize that. It's an
easement that we have given them, through the property~ That's how canals
work but we still pay the taxes on it. Most people understand that. SOt we are
liable. You know if something happens~ A lot of questions, I wish I could have
seen this as he was pointing it out because no one's talked to us about fencing~
No one's talked to us about the final report of the water. It really is concerning us
about our irrigation. This is farmland. We plan to farm for a while. We're asking
the city to work with US~ Everyone talks about how Meridian's growth is out of
controL I mean even at the last meeting, you didn't have the staff report ready~ I
mean, that indicates to me they're overworked. The other problem I have is when
I go in to find answers, no one will tell me anything. I think they're either afraid
that they don't know the answer or they're afraid I'm going to use their words
against them. How can I make a decision as a property owner and how can you
make decisions when we're only getting half-truths. Idaho Power told me that if
we didn't let those big huge lines go across our property that we couldn't
subdivide because they'd never be able to give us power~ But, all of a sudden,
these guys have power. That was told to me not once, but several, several times.
The reason we fought that, we weren't against power to the area but when a
developer sells them an acre and a half and gets 120 grand and Idaho Power
wants 30,000 just to give us our acre and a half easement and we still get to pay
(r... ..
\~ .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 23
the taxes on it. Our issue was they needed to change the way they did business.
It wasn't like we were trying to - but I didn't like being threatened that we'd never
be able to develop this because there's no power and all of a sudden there's
power. The reason I'm trying to tell you this is the Mortener family can't get any
straight answers from anybody~ I don't think it's fair and to me that indicates that
something's terribly wrong here and we need to slow down~ We need to slow
down~ No one had ever sat down with the Mortener family about the park
situation. N one has ever sat down with the Mortener family and discussed a bike
path or a greenbelt with us. But, all the developers know. The morning after we
had this last meeting, I had 2 developers at my door at 8:00~ They were
absolutely astounded that you guys tabled it. They thought we'd be ready to sell
because you approved this subdivision. Yesterday, I went to get the mail and my
mail carrier said I understand you're having a subdivision put around the back
part of your property. I said well, who told you that. She said my supervisor told
me that I'd be probably having to take that on. I said, that's interesting, they
haven't even voted on it yet. So, who informed the post office of this if we havenft
even decided yet~ I'm not quite sure how this all works. I feel like I'm at a loss. I
feel like I'm a rookie. I feel like I don't know any of the developers~ I don't have
anything to gain. I don't have anything to lose. I'm just a kid who's trying to
protect my mom's farm, speak for her because she can't be here. I mean I
question you know a lot of the suggestions and things that they say they're going
to do~ Take a drive out to my farm and look at how much of that litter is rolling
through our corn field as we irrigate it I've asked them 2 or 3 times to clean it up~
They've never discussed what kind of fence to put around~ They've never
discussed what kind of pipes~ I feel like when it effects the neighbor, -- You have
to realize this is a business for us. This is our business~ Farming is a business.
It's not just you know, we're worried about a view. I'm sorry, excuse me
gentlemen, lights in our windows. No~ I'm not worried about that at that point
because that part of our livability's already gone~ I have no view of the
mountains~ I have cars coming up~ I have 2 entrances on either side of my house
already~ I'm not worried about that anymore. I'm just worried about the ability if
you put more houses around there, it's~ You know the saying, farms and city and
houses don't mix~ There's a reason why people live in the city and there's a
reason why the farms are out further~ I know the growth is coming but you have a
chance here to make some right decisions and slow things down. Look what they
want to do with the foothills. All of a sudden they realize that they're going to run
out of open space. SOt they want to protect it~ I don't know. The other thing that
concerned me that I know it's a dead issue but I just have to bring it up. It was
not a misunderstanding and I think you're all smart enough to realize that about
that road going across that little v shape there~ They intentionally submitted that
plat to the city~ That was not a misunderstanding between Greg Johnson and
Briggs Engineering~ We had to draw it to their attention that no, my mother hadn't
died yet and no we weren't going to sell it yet. Even the City of Meridian staff are
shaking their heads still over that. What concerns me about it, is that they're
going to stand up here and tell you that half-truth, what else are they not telling
you. You know this is what concerns me. They say, well you don't like
~~.
~
.......~ r ~ . .
.~
. ..... :~~t:t.~:
... ~
.. ..~..."J:'~
(.. ..
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 t
Page 24
developers~ I like developers. I just don't like human beings that tell people the
total truth about what happens in these developments. To me a half-truth is just
as bad as an outright lie. I'm just asking, you know I don't know how you guys
can do it. I mean I can't make a decision. I don't know how the sewer's going.
When I go in and ask about the sewer thing, the staff can not give me an answer.
They told me that we'd run out of flushes~ I guess Caven can't put in houses
down the road because there is no power. I mean, it goes on and on. I've had
people calling me up this week. We saw in the paper where they want to put a
park in south of Thousand Springs. Is that your property? I said I don't know no
one's talked to us about it. I feel like we don't even own this property anymore. I
feel like everyone's making decisions and you know, I've been a citizen here for
a long time. You know I know this has nothing to do with whether you should
approve this or not but I think you need to hear this because this is what people
out there are telling me. You know and I have people telling me why do you even
bother to come because they don't listen to you anyway and I said because with
that attitude how are they going to know? You know if somebody doesn't stand
up and say something, how are you guys going to make a decision if you don't
hear this? If you're isolated, that's what happens if people don't hear what the
public's thinking. That's why you don't see the neighbors here. Part of the reason
the neighbors aren't here is because they're on illegal splits and they're scared to
come in here and testify. That's why you're not seeing any of the neighbors
complaining. We could have, the Mortener family could have protested it but we
were awful kind of nice and kind of let them. There's just a lot of stuff that I don't
understand goes on here~ I am like totally confused. You know) when I go in
there to try to find an answer, I can't get it~ I get told everything different. This has
been going on - you have to realize developers have been approaching our
family for 20 some years. My mother started going to these meetings in 1973 and
they told us this would all be farmland (inaudible). We've been hanging out at
these meetings for a long time. I realize that the situation has changed but I'll tell
you--. It just seems like you've got the opportunity to slow things down. The
voters spoke a couple weeks ago. They don't want anymore taxation. I know you
need the services. I'll get off my soap box but it just seems like this is now not the
time to put this particular subdivision has got a lot of problems not to mention
that You know what the neighborhood thinks about that school location? They all
told me it sucks~ I don't know how to put it in any other way. It is ridiculous when
we've got this much land, this is not Seattle, to be sticking schools in crappy
places. You know whenever I tell people they just gOf they're going to put it
where? I don't know what they're thinking. You know I mean maybe they think it's
a good place. But, I'll tell you what if I had a kid I wouldn't let him go there. That
Ridenbaugh is a very dangerous, dangerous canal. Very dangerous. I guess my
parents just loved me a lot more because we were never allowed to walk along
that as children and we owned it. Thank you very much.
Corrie: Thank you~ You kind of hit on 4 or 5 different things but thank you~ I
mean, you've got the school and the power~ We can't do much about that but I
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 25
appreciate your thoughts on this, though Mary_ We've discussed other things too.
Is there anyone else that wants to issue testimony on this?
De Weerd: Mr~ Mayor. I would like to kind of address a couple of things that
Mary had brought up. One is, the reason why the post office knows is, we have
to route the submittals to a number of agencies. We need to. They have to have
the opportunity to comment and since they are a service to these areas that
would be developed, they need to know what's coming up~ That's one issue.
Another issue is you mentioned no one approached you as far as parks or
pathways or anything else. We have a Comprehensive Plan and we right now
are in the middle of updating it. So, we've had a number of Public Hearings and a
number of public workshops so there is an amount of awareness out there of
where parks are being targeted, not developed. But, where we would like to have
open space and parkland~ Those have been informed through meetings and that
sort of thing~ So, they might have picked up that information from there. Certainly
DeChambeau: It was in the paper.
De Weerd: -- and in the paper. We have a master plan for our park system that
hasn't been approved yet by City Council but we've had a group of citizens
working on it. The newspaper does follow those things. Those are 2 areas. As far
as the piping or fencing, I hope that the developer will be able to respond to you
on that. They're just piping their side of the Ridenbaugh or they're fencing their
side of the Ridenbaugh. That should keep the people out. I agree with you on the
school ~
DeChambeau: Well, the other thing is you know our property borders all along
there and like I said, we're getting the trash from their other subdivision on our
property. I guess my point is, is I've alerted them to it, every meeting~ They all
know about it and they still haven't taken care of it.
De Weerd: This isn't the same developer though.
DeChambeau: Yeah, it is.
De Weerd: Oh, is it?
(inaudible discussion)
DeChambeau: Yeah, it is.
De Weerd: Well, it's not the same application so I hope the developer is
listening and they go pick up garbage. One other thing is I understand the plight
of the farmer. I wish that in our areas of impact there was something we could
do, but the farmers are selling out their land and they have the right to sell it off.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19" 200 I
Page 26
(.
The buyer has the right to do with it what is in our Comprehensive Plan. Right,
wrong or indifferentf you know Idahoans hold property rights near and dear to
their heart.
DeChambeau: No, I understand that.
De Weerd: Unfortunately, you know we see this across our whole area of
impact So, we are planning and we are trying to deal with that growth and we're
trying to do that in a logical manner~
DeChambeau: And I agree.
De Weerd: I do appreciate you coming in and giving testimony.
DeChambeau: I agree because with the planning and that type of thing but that's
what I'm saying~ YouJve got the county line. We are not annexed in. Part of this
hearing tonight is whether th.is will be annexed in right? Is that correct?
De Weerd: Yes.
OeChambeau: So, you know we already got our tax bill. They're already really
jumped it up and we're not even annexed yet. You know, what you want to do is
annex around USJ right? Is that correct?
De Weerd: That's the proposal.
OeChambeau: That is part of the proposaL I'm just saying that to me that is you
have the time to slow this down~ You have a time to slow down the growth of
Meridian. I mean, if you talk to the sewer people, (inaudible)-
Corrie: Just wrap up what you're --~ We've got a long agenda ahead of us.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you Mary. Okay. There's no other testimony. You have some
questions Kent. One of them was the water table and then the berm along
Victory road, exits. Any comments on that?
Brown: Mr. Pullman, (inaudible) I got his name wrong once and I had an
employee that was a Pullin and I mispronounced his name and I apologize. The
groundwater study talks about, that's in from our engineer speaks to his area and
that there is not a need for the cut off trench that we had originally proposed in
that area. Still. we have to maintain the 3 foot higher elevation from the ground
water~ That was discussed in our Preliminary Plat hearing before P&Z. Less of
the ground is going to be covered up with houses and streets but obviously,
that's the way our design is the way it is, So, that we can take care of that ground
f.
/~........ .
\.,......... ...
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 1
Page 27
water~ Mr~ Young's comments, yes we are putting a berm~ I apologize to him. It's
shown on our landscape plan, our architectural drawing that we have~ The road
access, Mr~ Young and I did meet with the Highway District. This was after the
hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission. When you get the minutes of
the meeting, they asked that we do that and ask our engineer to restudy that. As
you read his comments, he would rather the road stay where it's at. We talked
about, with him why is that, he says a cross generates more traffic. The road
would need to be re-graded. Victory Road would need to be re-graded~ Those
are things that the Highway District would do~ He's not sure that even when they
widen the road, that they're going to do that in the future~ He says that the
Thousand Springs location barely meets the minimums. In our meeting with himl
he stated that it was in his opinion that they shouldn't have put it there~ From their
in-house staff, he didn't want that Thousand Springs location there~ He does not
want to compound it by having it line up. Which comments do you want me to
speak to on Mary's?
Corrie: Any of the comments that the Council-
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Kent. you were talking about the engineer. Was that ACHD's engineer that
said they didn't want it moved across?
Brown: Yes. It was Joe Rosalind in that letter that you have that doesn't have a --
. It came as a fax to Steve and myself from Christy Richardson, The fax page
dated June 1 st.
Bird: I'm not a traffic engineer but it just makes sense to me that, that exit being
across from the Thousand Springs exit makes more sense to me than having 2 ,
exits onto within a quarter mile, they're not even a quarter mile. Within a quarter
mile of the roadway you've got 2 entrances onto Victory Road. I do realize that
Thousand Springs, if I remember right is down right off the - kind of in the lower
part of the I ittle rim up there ~ Like I say t I'm not a traffic eng i neer.
Brown: Mr~ Mayor, Councilman Bird. In the staff report on April 13th from your
own staff, it summarized the different discussions that they had~ Christy
Richardson submitted a letter from ACHD dated April 11th~ It's the one that Mr~
Rosalind makes mention of. They do not want to move the road to the proposed
location of Tuscany Road. The proposed location to the east is the safest. That
was a concern of the P&Z and you know we've gone back and forth with this~
Prior to this project being my project, Becky Bowcutt did the layout of the eastern
portion and she met with tech reviews with them. We'd have lined it up way
before we did anything else. We know how critical those exits and entrances to
the development are~ It changes your traffic report. You can modify things within
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 2001
Page 28
(" .
the development and it has less of an impact but when you mess with the
exterior and the traffic generation and everything else is different.
Bird: You're right there.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mrs~ de Weerd~
De Weerd: Kent, did you meet with the neighbor to the, Mary and her mom?
Brown: we had a neighborhood meeting with all of the neighbors from the
development in December. We talked about our proposed project. We had been
in these meetings and discussed irrigation. Bruce Freckleton explained to her
that state law requires us and Meridian is concerned that we continue irrigation
water to and through, to them. In these meetings, as I did tonight, we talked
about that we're going to fence those properties. They're going to be fenced with
chainlink or wrought iron fence. My client hasn't proposed cedar on anything in
the development so there's no weed or fence burning issues~
De Weerd: But, when you look at it, their piece of property is the one that you
impact the most and you probably should have been talking to them about the
fencing specifically. I don't know what the concerns were on piping, or size of or
whatever. You really should be talking to them directly on the fence.
Brown: The piping is something that definitely --. We haven't done engineering
drawing and that's where we were going to talk to them about the piping. This I
way premature to spend more money on a project that you guys might not
approve at this point to talk about irrigation and how that is going to get to their
property. The reassurances have been made in all of the public meetings that it's
going to get to them~ If we don't do it, I mean, we can get sued. I mean state law
is pretty particular about how we get the water to them. We do abut the Mortener
property along our eastern portion here~ Where our property line meets them is in
the center of the canaL We are fencing all of the canal right-of-way, which is 50
to 75 feet anywhere from them. It's well on our property. When we're on the other
side of the Ridenbaugh Canal, as I explained when we cross here, we'll fence
access from the Ridenbaugh. It's going to be back here. It's not going to be
anywhere near their property~ When we go along here, this is the portion that we
abut the Mortener farm and that's for the most part is going to be wrought iron
fence~ My client doesn't wantt for the type of homes that heJs putting in here, he
wants to put wrought iron fence against them~ Six-foot high wrought iron fence.
Which would comply with your fencing requirements at the subdivision~ That
allows them the ability to still farm and do that. He doesn't want to put chainlink
there, but that would be the other option that we would have to allow them to be
able to maintain their ditches and things around their property.
i~ ~~.. .. .
t..
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 29
De Weerd: As well, Mr. Pullman had brought up the water table with drainage
you)re all putting in, that should significantly improve that.
Brown: Drop it~ Yes it should.
De Weerd: I still lastly have the issue of the school site. I know, he said his
preference to me would be an opening along the front side~
Brown: What you understand-
De Weerd: Not a road opening but the front side because werre talking
frontage roads.
Brown: What you understand over the phone and what he pointed out to me, I
guess you can be like Mary and call me a liar-
De Weerd: I really don't have an interest in doing that
Brown: I didn't think SO~ This is the portion where he said we might look at
opening that up and asked me if that was a possibility and I said yes. I said what
we want to do is whatever school site - in the previous hearing I testified that if
you look on your Preliminary Plat drawing, the current configuration is a cross~
That's the type that they're using. They're looking at going to a v shape~ The v
shape, depending on how that best fits the site. You know, they might have it
open up down here. He said that we can probably anticipate that we're going to
have 2 entrances or an entrance and an exit so that the buses, so forth can flow..
His comment in the P&Z really hasn't changed in the fact he says you know if we
can have the flexibility to work with that site in this location so that he can best fit
his school on there~ That's what he would like for you to approve. That's his
comments to me and I guess in a court of law that would be hearsay but that's
what he told me.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Let's get one thing clear. Did the school district buy that or did you donate
that ground to them?
Brown: The school has not purchased it. They have it on a list. I'm on one of the
committees for them locating school sites, helping them find those.
Bird: So, that's not 1 00 percent guaranteed that's going to be a school site?
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19? 200 I
Page 30
(
\
Brown: It is not 100 percent guaranteed but they do have money set aside for
buying school sites~ They bought the Pepper Hills one~ They are interested in this
one. They need one in this mile section.
Bird: Butt if something should come up, a better location or something, they're
not - they can certainly (inaudible)~
Brown: They can definitely move it. We would have to come back-
Bird: I just wanted to clarify that.
Brown: -- with another plat for that portion.
Bird: (inaudible)
Brown: Especially if you set up the meeting that you're talking about, maybe.
De Weerd: It needs to get resolved~
Brown: In our discussion this spot is 5 to 7 years away~ From our property we are
fencing all of the canals. There won't be any access that we'll provide to the
Ridenbaugh Canal, that they will be fenced in compliance with your ordinance~
So, that they have no access but we still have to provide a means for the ditch
rider and others to get there. There are going to be gates where we cross the
Ridenbaugh Canal, they've got a nice road~
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird~
Bird: Kent, I think to be a good neighbor, and it's what I brought up before that
where you're bounding up to the farm there, when you start construction. We all
know when you start construction, you're going to have paper blowing and
everything~ That's open out through there so ifs going to blowout through there.
I don't think it would be a bad policy to go ahead and fence that north section of
your property and even come down to the Ridenbaugh on the return down south
there~ I think it would certainly make nice for the neighbors. Of course your first
phase, you're going to come across and do your south boundary. You know how
construction can be..
Brown: I sure do Mr. Bird. Maybe I'd make a suggestion we could put up a
construction fence that would help alleviate that. I would not be opposed to
having that as a requirement that --~
Bird: You go to a lot of construction sites, I don't care how many signs you put up
or anything else, debris does get blown all over the place.
(:
c... .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 3 1
Brown: So, you're talking about that being at the first phase, just to clarify that?
Bird: Yeah~ I think you need to really work with the neighbors out there on the
deal Kent. You know I think you just need to make sure that the debris isn't
blowing all over because evidently they're getting it. They've had to live with it for
Thousand Springs. During the construction of that. She said it was coming -
Brown: It comes across from Sherbrooke that's right across the street-
Bird: Yeah, Sherbrooke and Thousand Springs~
Brown: And I'm sure it comes from Thousand Springs too because it's elevated.
Bird: You know, I'm on construction sites everyday.
Johnson: Council, I'm Greg Johnson. I live at 2433 CanAda Road in Melba.
Councilman Bird, I think the best solution for the fencing would be if, when we
come into the first section that goes to the Ten Mile, we will put all the permanent
fencing in that section~ When we cross the Ten Milel we'll put all the permanent
fencing in along the Eight Mile on the west side and the portion that wraps
around the Ridenbaugh there. So that, even if it's a phase that's only in the north
half, that that whole section is fenced. Then when we cross the Eight Mile, we
would put the permanent fencing along the Mortener's property and wrap it all the
way into the Ridenbaugh. It's not going to eliminate the problem but it will make it
as good as we can do. As we go through those sections, we'll put up the
permanent fencing at that time. (inaudible)
Bird: That would be agreeable.
Corrie: Okay. Any other questions?
Bird: I have none Mayor.
Corrie: Staff? Okay~
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: How long is she going to be?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: As soon as she gets back here, we'll have her enter that Then we can
close it~ Okay, we)1I notify it in the record that this is a letter to Steve Siddoway
from Christy Richardson principal-
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
.Page 32
***End of Side Two***
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Yeah, I opened it all up. So, we'll close them one at a time.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we close the Public Hearing on the request for annexation and
zoning of 156.21 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed subdivision by Gem Park II
Pa rtnershi ps.
Corrie: Okay. Motion's been made. Do I hear a second.
Anderson: Second ~
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to close the Public Hearing on the
request for annexation and zoning No~ 023. Any further discussion? All those in
favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Discussion on the request for annexation and zoning?
Anderson: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mr~ Anderson.
Anderson: I guess I'm really struggling with this piece of property being
contiguous~ When I look at the piece of property it only has 3 or 400 feet of
frontage that currently is adjacent to our city limits and that's clear in the very last
phase of development. Sar as this project gets developed and as the phases go
in, in effect for the next 7 to 10 years, while this is being developed, we've done
spot annexation. It will not be contiguous. So, I have some real concerns.. I mean
it looks like the sewer is going to come off from Locust Grove and probably of the
neighborhood of this subdivision will be completely built out before this thing ever
becomes contiguous to the city limits which is something that we've been trying
to avoid completely. Then I also have some reservations I guess about the water
pressure in the area. We talked about this area to the north and the east is going
to need some type of additional pressure.. The access roads bother me too. Just
putting a little access road off that one cui de sac really only gains you access if
that main entry's blocked - if that first intersection]s blocked, it only gains you
access to about a dozen lots or SO~ The idea behind secondary access is so that
(~.. .
. .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
.Page 33
you can access the entire subdivision and I don't think this does a very good job
of that. As Herman mentioned earlier, I think there's several issues that we ought
to be thinking about. This is 353 homes and our recent attempt at increasing our
mill levy so that we can beef up the police and fire so that we can cover our
exploding population failed. To be continually adding these large subdivisions like
this is totally ludicrous to me. It's just adding more problems to what we already
have. I think the fact that the roads are narrow roads. There's no plans to
upgrade these roads for at least 20 years~ The fact that the schools are over
crowded in the area. The fact that Idaho Power is questioning their ability to even
provide power at this point and it was just September 1st until they stared the
process and well into 2000 before they thought they could even come up with it
and that's if everything goes smooth for them. What if that snags along the way?
What if they don't get their approvals? I just think this subdivision is a little bit
ahead of its time right now. It doesnJt really meet the ideal conditions for
approving it. To me it would just be another example of Meridian approving
something that we don't need at this point
Corrie: Any other comments? IF there are no other comments then I will
entertain a motion then on the request for annexation and zoning.
Anderson: Mr~ Mayor~
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: I would make a motion that we deny this request for a Preliminary
Plat approval for 353 building lots and 39 other lots - Or annexation and zoning.
Sorry>> I'm reading the wrong one here. For the 156.21 acres from RT to R-4 for
proposed Tuscany Lakes subdivision and instruct the city Attorney to prepare
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
Corrie: Okay~ Motion's been made for a denial of request for annexation and
zoning. Is there a second?
McCandless: I second~
Corrie: Okay~ Motion been made and seconded to deny the request for
annexation and zoning of the AZ 00-023~ Any further discussion?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs.. de Weerd.
De Weerd: (inaudible) away from listening to me. I think this is a nice looking
project and it will be a good addition to our community. But I agree with
Councilman Anderson, it's not time for it yet. I guess my concern is certainly we
have power restrictions in there~ Water pressure concerns in half of the
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 34
(~_...
subdivision~ Roadway issues certainly. School issues that we need to clear up
with the school district~ But, this also opens up a new area to development
Because one little piece is contiguous to the city, this is going to open up a huge
are~ I know that the hardship of the farmers are really driving a lot of this. But, as
we're trying to do in the north corridor with an overlay and plan for this area. I
would not be opposed to including the southern part of our area of impact in that
as well because we're stretched. We're stretched in services. There's speculation
abound with our open space and our fire. We do have a substation down there
that we don't have the money to build yetw SOt there are a number of issues.
Even though I like the project, I just don't think it's time for it yet. In all good
conscience I can't support it.
McCandless: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs" McCandless.
McCandless: I've been concerned all along about police protection and fire
protection out there so far from. We have enough trouble with what we have now
without adding more until we can build like Tammy said, a fire station out in the
south~ I'm worried about the roads going into the subdivision because there
doesn't seem to be very many. I don' think they have a good access to it. Other
than that, I too think it's a beautiful addition. But, it's just a little bit before it's time,
or after it's time.
Bird: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird~
Bird: I'll give my 2 cents worth. This will probably be more in the plat. And I'm not
a designer but I think the road, -- it looks like a jigsaw puzzle to me. I don't like
the layout. I don't like the - they don't have enough entrances and exits. Fire and
police don't worry me. We grew 264 percent in the 10 years but our fire and
police grew over 300 percent so we can grow with that. I'm not worrying about
that. I think that this area is not ready for this yet. I think that the roads and just
the subdivision needs to have more entrances, exits. I don't see how fire trucks
and stuff can get in and around there that well. It's one we turned down before
that had the same kind of deal. I just like the design of it.
Corrie: Okay~ Any other comments? Then the motion is for the Attorney to draw
up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial of the annexation
and zoning of the Tuscany Lakes subdivision~ With that in mind, your voting aye
would be for the denial, naye would be for the approval. Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
(:.....
c
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~2001
Page 35
Corrie: I will entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on the request for
Preliminary Plat.
Anderson: So moved.
McCandless: Second~
Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing on the Preliminary
Plat. All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: I'll entertain a motion for the Preliminary Plat.
Anderson: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mr~ Anderson~
Anderson: I would make a motion that we deny the request for a Preliminary
Plat for 353 building lots and 39 other lots on 156.21 acres in a proposed R-4
zone for Tuscany lakes subdivision and instruct the city Attorney to draw up the
appropriate Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law~
McCandless: Second~
Corrie: Motion been made and seconded to deny the Preliminary Plat and have
the attorney draw up the proper order, Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law~
Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Now, item No~ 12 is a -1'11 entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing
for the request for a Conditional Use Permit~
Anderson: So moved.
McCandless: Second~
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to close the Public Hearing on the
request for Conditional Use Permit CUP No~ 052. All those in favor of the motion
say aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: I'll entertain a motion then for the denial of the Conditional Use Permit
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 38
(
have much choice but to exceed the cui de sac length as this is approximately 60
feet wide here at Overland Road which will be a roadway~ In order to access the
Ada County Highway District park and ride lot and also this area here which is
proposed to be a Gold's Gym at this time, they do need to exceed that~ So, it was
a clean up on their original submittal of a plat~ The 2 lot subdivision, that didn't
work out very well. That doesn't show the plat very well here~ The park and ride
here as you see is what was previously approved through a Conditional Use
Permit and then this would be the Gold's Gym area. We would recommend
approval of the variance to the cui de sac length and also recommend approval
of the Preliminary Plat with all staff and agency conditions~ We do need to add
one additional condition that was not, I don't believe it was shown before but it
was clarification on the fencing on the southern boundary here~ That they would
need to provide a fence to keep the horses from getting out into the field where
they have this (inaudible) going. That would be part of their fencing requirement
for the plat.
Bird: A stock fenceJ or what kind of fence?
Corrie: Is it to keep them in or keep them out?
Bird: Hot wire?
Corrie: Any questions for staff? This is a Public Hearing. We'll hear from the
applicant at this point~ You have 5 minutes.
Stiles: (inaudible)
Corrie: Jonathan can do it though~
Bird: Jonathan can do it~
Seal: Good evening Mayor, Council Members~ My name is Jonathan Seal, W~H~
Moore Company, 600 north Steelhead Boise Idaho~ I can probably make this
fairly short I think~ Shari's already explained to you about the plat and the
variance~ I think she did a good job on that. We read through the staff report.
We're in agreement with that. We would simply ask tonight that you approve both
the variance as well as the plat which is basically the park and ride and what
resulted in a residual lot which will ultimately be a Gold's Gym, at least at this
point. I'd be glad to answer any questions that you have.
Corrie: Do you agree with this fencing?
Seal: Yeah. I think, Mayor, the issue with the fencing is really ACHDts but we
have talked, I have talked to Steve Stucoomeyer about that. They recognize that
they have to put the fencing up and they will put that up. That was an agreement
as part of the Conditional Use Permit that apparently was left out in their
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 1
Page 39
conditions. They acknowledge the fact that yes, they do need to do that They
currently right now have out to bid for construction of the road. The road will
include the fencing and all of the other various stuff that goes into it.
Corrie: Council, questions?
Bird: I have none~
Corrie: Thank you~
Seal: You're welcome~ Shorter than 5 minutes?
Corrie: Thank you. You did a nice job. Is there anyone from the public that
would like to issue testimony?
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor~ I just want to remind Jonathan. You can't save that for
another application~
Corrie: Okay, hearing none, last call for anybody that has any testimony. Thank
you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Hearing nonel )'11 entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on the
request for the variance.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr~ Bird~
Bird: I move that we close the request for variance of the street length ending in a
cui de sac from the maximum length of 450 feet to an increased length of 495
feet for proposed park and ride lot by W.H. Moore Company.
Anderson: Second
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to close the Public Hearing for variance
VAR 01-006~ Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Any further discussion? I'll entertain a motion then for the variance
request.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
(/--.'.. .~
(" .........:
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 40
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the request for a variance of the street length
ending in a cui de sac from the maximum length of 450 feet to an increased
length of 495 feet for the proposed park and ride lot by W~H. Moore and for the
Attorney to draw up the proper papers.
Anderson: Second ~
Corrie: Motion been made and seconded to approve the variance request and
have the attorney draw up the proper papers. Any further discussion? Mr~ Berg,
roll call vote please.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: At this time I'll entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing on the
request for Preliminary Plat 008~
Anderson: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing on the Preliminary
Plat 008. All those in favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: I'll entertain a motion then for the request for the Preliminary Plat.
Anderson: Mr~ Mayor..
Corrie: Mr. Anderson~
Anderson: I would make a motion that we approve the request for a Preliminary
Plat for 1 building lot and 1 ACHD park and ride lot on 6.36 acres in a C-G zone
for the proposed Traveler's Corner and instruct the city Attorney to draw up the
appropriate Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
McCandless: Second~
Corrie: Motion been made and second to approve the request for Preliminary
Plat PP 01-008 and have the attorney draw up the proper Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr.
Berg~
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 4 1
(
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Yes Mr. Anderson~
Anderson: Could I request about a 5-minute break?
Corrie: Yes. Okay, we will take a 5-minute break and come back here at 10
minutes ltil.
READJOURNED AT 8:43 P.M.
Item 15.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-014
Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Christian Ministry for
office space and an AftercarelTransitional home for men, serving
as a group-living environment for 14 men and 1 live-in House
Supervisor in an R-4 zone for Whole Life Restoration House by
B.A.S.I.C. Outreach Ministriesf Inc -1304 West 1st Street:
Corrie: All right, I'll call the meeti.ng back to order. We will start with item No. 15
which is a continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001 ~ Requesting for a
Conditional Use Permit for a Christian Ministry for office space and the after care
transitional home for men living as a group-living environment for 14 men and
one live-in house supervisor in an R-4 zone for Whole Life Restoration House by
BASIC Outreach Ministries Inc. 1304 west First street~ At this time I will open the
continued Public Hearing and have staffs comments first
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council. This is for the property located at 1304 west First
Street~ You have the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning
Commission. A couple of the issues that were raised in that recommendation
were the use of signage on the house there. They are proposing one sign on the
house. It would say welcome to BASIC Outreach Ministries Whole Life
Restoration House. This would need to be specifically approved. Even for home
occupation, signage is prohibited. They would need to provide the appropriate
paved parking areas as outlined in the recommendation. The recommendation
also states that the professional office use is prohibited as proposed~ They are, in
order to operate, they are required to get a certificate of occupancy and meet all
the fire and building code requirements. I believe they are operating at the
present time~ We did have some letters submitted in opposition. We, at first had
recommended denial of this application. However at the Planning and Zoning
Commission there was not a great deal of opposition to the project I believe the
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19:t 200 I
Page 42
applicant has done a good job of getting together with most of the neighborhood
and explaining their program and has seemed to ward off some of the opposition
of the surrounding neighborhood. I didn't see in my packet, any response from
the school district. It is located not far from an elementary school. As you can see
on the mapt this would be the location here in an existing home. This is the home
that they are proposing to use and uses around the property. This is the rough
site plan they have submitted showing parking off the alley and they would need
to meet the conditions of the Ada County Highway District and our staff in the
requirements for paving and landscaping and other issues that were brought up
at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting~ That's all the information I
have to give you. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them or turn
it over to the applicant.
Corrie: Council, any questions of staff?
Bird: I have none~
Corrie: Okay~ Is the applicant here this evening?
Durham: Yes, Mr. Mayor. My name is Mike Durham and I am the owner of the
property at 1304 west First Street in Meridian. I serve as the executive director of
the ministry of BASIC Outreach Ministries who is proposing to establish the
Whole Life Restoration House at this location~ Basically, I'm sorry for a late
response to the packet here. Wetve been waiting on some contractor bids on the
improvements that are required on the property. We have some specific
problems with the 30 items that were listed here. The improvements that were
necessary. Basically, what we feel is happening here is the improvements that
were requested, specifically the ADA requirement for this program are basically
in excess of the value of the property~ It's going to take more than the property is
worth to comply with these improvements. Another thing that happened with this
whole process that sort of took the wind out of our sails, when the office use and
the remodel on the garage was denied because basically we would have to go
outside of the home there to provide space for our counseling services and our
education services for the home. That creates another financial hardship for the
ministry as well as putting a strain on services here. What we, in essence are
running here is a program that is a discipleship program for men who have
substance abuse issues who are coming out of drug and alcohol treatment
environments~ It is a religious based program and we don't know where we
legally stand on the ADA issue, if in a discipleship house environment if
compliance to the Americans with disability act is necessary~ We know that there
are an awful lot of discipleship homes in the area that are not meeting those
types of requirements and have not been asked to. In any easel the ministry
needed to apply for this conditional use prior to purchasing the property. We
have a lease option on the property right now. My wife and I own the property but
the ministry had the lease option~ Basically, we needed to find out if this property
was going to work for us before we could move forward with any programming to
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 43
/.
\.,.... ..
(.. .
\~ . .
any extent We do have 6 people living in the house right now. We are running a
discipleship program in the house right now. If we have to comply with all 30 of
these items within this limited time frame, it's going to take us at least a year to
raise the funds necessary to make these improvements. It would severally limit
the ministry's ability if we're not able to run our programs~ We don't want to
create any ill will with the city or the neighborhood on any way. If we have to
comply with all these 30 items before we can move forward with any
programming then we're going to need to go ahead and probably find a different
property and at that time, we'd withdraw our application. What we would
specifically like to ask is that the compliance with ADA, could that be
reconsidered by the Council and that our office use be considered not as a
professional office use but as a home office use specifically for the purposes of
the ministry that's being run in the home to the residents that would be in the
home. With regard to the education center that we had planned for the garage
area, we understand that there are some issues there with the requirement for 2
garages. We want to be in compliance in every way possible. But, it does take
the wind out of our sails. It does limit us in our ability to raise funds. There is an
awful lot of monies available out there in the way of grants and things for
educational purposes. There's not an awful lot of money available for substance
abuse after care or discipleship programs. So, there was a specific financial
concern in wanting to establish the education center there also. The other part of
wanting to have the education center in that garage there was part of what needs
to happen with these guys. In order to move them on and transition them
properly we have to improve their earning potentials. In order to improve their
earning potential we need to improve their education. A lot of times that's basic
high school things. A lot of times that's some computer training and things of that
nature. We have the computers. They've already been donated and it's a
necessary thing if we're going to be successful in transitioning them and helping
them to stabilize in the community to be able to improve their earning potential.
Thafs about all I have. I don't want to take up a lot of time~ It's getting late
tonight.
Bird: Mr. Mayor
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Mike, is this a work release house where they come and stay and stuff but
they can work out.
Durham: Yes. All of the men that are in the house would be required to work full
time. Full time is defined at least 32 hours per week~ Each one of the men work
and they pay their own way in the house.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: No, it's not a work release -
(...
('.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 44
Durham: It's not a correctional type place.
Bird: I've had young men work for me that lived in a similar house in Boise. I
don't know about on the handicap. What do you do if you have a handicap
person come? ADA and I don't know where the law goes, or how it goes. I have
always understood it (inaudible) which I take it this is open to the public?
Durham: Right.
Bird: Then when you remodel you have to come up to ADA standards.
Durham: Yeah~ As our remodeling plans would move forward, we would of
course want to comply. It's the amount of time really-
Bird: I understand that~
Durham: -- that it would take to get us to that point that's a real stumbling block to
us. We'd want to comply eventually with all 30 of these items but it's going to
take us some time.
Bird: First of all I want to say that what you guys do is greatly appreciated from
my aspect and I firmly stand behind you. I know that getting started like this with
limited resources is tough but I don't know where we stand within the law,
ourselves of what we can delay or put on a year's basis or something like that to
get it up to code. I don't know how we can do that. I for one would be willing to
work anyway we could with you with this program because I have seen results of
this program and it is a very good program.
Durham: One other thing that I wanted to mention. One of the items of the 30
was replacement of trees. I have contacted the parks department. There are the
2 trees that, one of them it would be absolutely necessary to be removed to
make room for our parking in the front area of the house.. Both of these trees, we
believe fall into the category of nuisance trees and we contacted the parks
department to see if they cannot be classified as that so that we would not have
that item to deal with as well because they're pretty substantial trees.
Bird: Mr. Mayor. While Mike's here, I'd like to ask the attorney what does he say
about the ADA and all of those compliances that -
Corrie: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Councilman Bird, because this is a
Conditional Use within this zone and because it's converting the house from a
single family residential which is not required to meet ADA standards to
essentially a public facility which is title 3 of the Americans with disabilities act.
(.
(~
cu.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 45
Thafs where the code requirements come in with regards to these standards. I
believe that the Light House in that's in Nampa on Nampa Caldwell Boulevard
which provides a ministry very similar to this had to meet the ADA and fire
protection and building codes in Nampa before they could begin providing their
ministry to those men in very similar circumstances to what your target ministry
is. The ADA is not a city code. It's a federal law. Typically these changes in use
have to meet all applicable local, state and federal codes. This is one of them
that has to be met in order for that certificate of occupancy to be issued for you to
legally have these non-family members there on a less than a transitory basis~
When Uncle George comes to visit you donJt have to upgrade your house to ADA
standards. But, when you have something like this when you have to apply for a
Conditional Use Permit_ It would be the same even if wasn't a faith based
ministry. If it were a business, a non-profit organization that provided these
services and obtained their funds through grants and whatever and had no faith
based issues at all. They would be required to bring it up to ADA standards~
Bird: That's what I was afraid of. I have no other questions, Mayor.
Corrie: Any other questions?
Anderson: I have one..
Corrie: Okay J Mr. Anderson..
Anderson: In your letter of response then - normally what happens and I
understand you don't do this on a daily basis like the developers~ They write back
and they write specifically which of the conditions that they take an exception to.
You just said that I can't comply with all 30 but you're not real specific about
which things you can't comply with other than you mentioned the ADA. So, does
that mean that there's -
Durham: The ADA compliance is a big issue as far as the cost of the remodel for
the house" Also there's some egress issues in the basement if the office use is
denied then why would you ask for the egress in the basement? That's a concern
for us. The cost and expense of taking out and then replacing the trees in front
were a major factor for us. Our parking that was shown in our plan, we did not
realize that they would be asking specifically for us to go as far down into the
alleyway as they asked that we do that and some sidewalk replacements. As we
go through this, the cost is exorbitant and for us and it does exceed the value of
the property itself. For a Christian ministry specifically. this just would not be
good stewardship for us to go out and raise the funds for a property that would
never be worth that anyway. We should would love it if there was some way that
we could work through this and get some time extension and be able to go into a
capitol campaign raise the funds and do the work that's necessary~ We definitely
understand that there are some problems here with this property~ You kind of
have to go through this process to find out what all these things are. There's an
(
(.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 46
awful lot of those 30 items that could be listed. The reason that, in our position
letter, basically, we've been waiting on some bids from contractors and those
didn't come in on time. We had hoped to have some specific numbers to deal
with and we don't have specific numbers to deal with. SOl that position statement
was written about an hour before the meeting tonight. I did that myself and that
was just to kind of let you know the concern here for the ministry if we have to
comply with all of the 30 items and we have to comply with them prior to being
able to receive a certificate of occupancy that would be cost prohibited for the
ministry and basically put us out of business in this area and we'd have to go
looking for another property.
Anderson: I almost hear you saying 2 separate things. One is you're saying that
if you were given enough time that you would comply with all 30 of these issues.
Then I also hear you saying that this piece of property you would be sinking too
much money into it and that it would never, you'd never be able to recoup your
expenses if it-
Durham: In that particular location, if you put that kind of money into it you would
not be able to recoup those expenses~ So, you would be talking about a long
term use here for this purpose. You would not be talking about trying to turn the
property over anytime in the near future~ We'd be talking about a long term use~
Corrie: Okay, anybody else? Okay. Mike, thank you.
Durham: Thank you.
Corrie: We have 5 people signed up to testify and would like to testify for this
project. James Hughes? Sorry, but we can't get you on record~
Hughes: I'm James Hughes~ Ifm president of the board of directors of BASIC
Outreach Ministries. Mike has really talked quite a bit about our issue here~ I
think he has reiterated really well where the board stands~ We felt this was an
opportunity for us to institute our first house in the area of Ada County~ We now
realize if really all 30 of those requirements are to be met, that from the
standpoint of capitol improvements it would just outweigh the cost of the
property~ Where we're at with regard to starting the ministry is that we need to be
raising the money for the program and expanding that to help people. If we put all
of the money and the resources that we have as a board of directors or as we
start this ministry in fund raising purposes for just improving the property we
probably aren't doing what we need to do for people. I think from our standpoint,
we'd like to see any kind of latitude you might allow us as you pointed out in
terms of time that would allow us first of all to address the most pressing issues
first. And secondly, maybe backing away from some of the more cosmetic kinds
of things. We, for example noticed that many of the houses in the area don't have
some of the requirements that you are listing. We're wondering whether or not
some of the least expensive and consuming issues in terms of dollars, you would
(. .
\ .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June J 9, 2001
Page 47
back away from possibly. At this point I want to go ahead and turn this over to
other members of our board that want to speak~ We do appreciate very much
that you've taken the time] both the Planning and Zoning people when we met
prior and for this Public Hearing as well. We know one thing. This problem is a
real prevalent issue and we feel that. You knowJ Mr~ Mayor we've talked with you
personally. We know that this is a good solution. We know we get results. We're
hoping that this is the location that we. could be comfortable with and that the
neighborhood would be comfortable with that we could co-exist and we could do
a service for the people in the community that need the service we provide~
Thank you very much.
Corrie: Thank you James. Art Lane?
Lane: I'm Arthur Lane and I live in Boise Idaho and this is my wife the lovely
Rosetta~ So, you're going to get a 2 for one here and we'll try to keep it to the
minutes -
***End of Side Three***
A. Lane: (inaudible) We're the parents of the person who has graduated from this
program. We're very proud that our son was a part of this program. We're proud
that Mike is providing this community and the Treasure Valley this service
because it has changed his life~ We would hope that Meridian would be a
community where you could have this service to the community, that you could
effect peoplets lives, especially the parents. I'll turn it over to the lovely Rosetta.
R. Lane: My name is Rosetta Lane and I am the mother of Sam Lane. We really
didn't have any - you know it's hard to find some place to find help. Like Arthur
said, our son has completed the program, now has a good job and is doing very
well. We're thankful that he had the opportunity.
A. Lane: Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you~ (inaudible)
Durham: That was me.
Corrie: That was you? (1m sorry, Mike~ I was thinking MichaeL Okay, is it
Richard?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Oh, he has left? Okay~ Is there anyone else here that would like to
testify? Yes sir~
(. :--
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 48
Butler: Mark Butler, 52 east State Street~ J'm actually here for another item on the
agenda but I have helped a couple of churches go through the process. Eagle
City found a certain aspect of law quite helpful in allowing a church to get through
some of the structural requirements. Because as you know churches, often times
especially when they're starting are very limited in funds~ What they found
helpful, and maybe the city attorney is aware of this or not aware of it. Maybe the
Council and attorney could consider it. In 2000 the federal religious freedom and
institutionalized persons act was passed and allows a lot of flexibility for
governing agencies to vary their requirements to a certain extent to allow
churches to have a little bit better foot hold in the community~ Maybe that's
something you could look into. Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you. Anyone else like to testify? Council) comments?
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would like to make one comment. If it is at all legal I would be willing to
help them along. The only thing I worry about and it's not the ADA~ I worry about
the life safety, the fire~ When you get that many people in there what kind of
alarm system do you have? Do you have enough exits? Do you have panics on
the door so they can't be permanently locked from the inside, you can always get
out? That would be one requirement if I was running the program that I would
worry about is the life safety~ The ADAt yes, it's very important but I think that it
seems like some business get by with it some donJt~ If there's anyway possible
legally, I am one Councilman that would like to help you because I have seen the
results of your program and I, as Mr. Lane said I've seen a couple of young kids
come out of it that it really turned their lives around and made them worthy
citizens and very good employees.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: A couple of comments. I'm not sure which way to go with this thing
but I agree with Keith. This sounds like a very worthwhile program that really has
an impact on people's lives. I think everybody sitting up here at this counter is
very supportive of that. I guess the problem is, like Keith said, a lot of these
specific requirements that are in here some of them are cosmetic things but
some of those are life safety issues like the exiting out of the basement and
those types of things. I think there's probably some flexibility that if you wanted
some additional time to work with staff, you indicated that you were just typing
this letter out an hour before the meeting. But, if you would work with some of the
staff people maybe they could have some of these items that they could put
some time frames on for you that you had to have these done within but the life
(
t.
(~:.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 1
Page 49
safety things, the critical things, would have to be done initially. I guess I would
be glad to continue the Public Hearing to give you another 2 weeks or another
month or whatever to work on some of those items with staff and see if
something could be worked out with them if that would be a desirable outcome.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Michael, if you could come up here and be on record I would be much
more comfortable extending you some time, if we heard what you're saying.
Durham: (Jm sorry.
Corrie: Thank you.
Durham: Yes. If we could have another month to work with staff on this it would
give us a lot better idea of where our position is and we'd have our bids in on the
property and probably be in a much better position to make a sound decision
here on how to move forward.
Corrie: My other suggestion would be, ADA does concern me because if you
start putting all of this in here, and I don't know how they work~ If they come in
and say you have to cease, then you.va lost every thing_ Maybe you can talk to
that division of the ADA or whoever's in charge of that and maybe get some kind
of a compensation for that. I think they would be willing to work with you. I hope
they would be because what you're doing is fantastic and it gives other people a
chance to straighten their lives out. Like Ron said, I think the safety issues is a
must. I mean, from what I understand you have some there now. If you had a fire
there and somebody got killed or burned I would feel terrible, as you would I
know~ I think my recommendation would be that they give you some more time
and I think the Council seems to be leaning that way. I would encourage you to
check with the ADA rules and just see how strict they're going to be on that-
Durham: I certainly will.
Corrie: -- because it would be tragic to have everything ready to go and we
approve it Then they come in and say, and they might be blind but sometimes
they do some crazy things. Any other questions or discussion of Council? Okay,
Mike thank you. Council, what is your pleasure? Would you like to continue this
for some time?
McCandless: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless~
(..........
c.: .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June] 9, 200 I
Page 50
McCandless: I will move that we continue this Public Hearing until July 17th to
give them time to get their figure together and see what they can do and be with
the staff.
Bird: I second that with one - would you mind moving it to the 31st?
McCandless: No~ That's fine.
Bird: Because sometimes when you get contractors and stuff trying to get prices
and stuff you just can't - We don't have a meeting the 31st?
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: That's the 5th one that's right The 24th is non-land issues.
Corrie: (inaudible) the first meeting in August.
Bird: Would you go for the first meeting in August, Council?
McCandless: Finet Keith.
Bird: Sometimes getting bids and stuff on this stuff takes a while.
Corrie: That would be the 7th.
Bird: To the 7th of August. Would you agree with that Cherie?
McCandless: Yes. If that's all right with them.
Corrie: It may take the government that long -
Bird: ('II guarantee it'll take the ADA that long to get back to them.
Corrie: Okay. We have a motion for the Council to continue the Public Hearing
until August 7th. Is there any further discussion? Hearing nonel all those in favor
say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 16.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: RZ 01-004
Request for a rezone of 8.29 acres from L-Q to C-G for Waltman
Court Subdivision by John Goade - south of Troutner Business
Park, between Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Road:
Item 17.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2001: PP 01-007
Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 6 building lots and 1 other
Meridian City Council Meeting
June] 9, 200 I
Page 5 t
lot on 8.29 acres in a proposed C-G zone for proposed Waltman
Court Subdivision by John and Sandra Goade - south of Troutner
Business ParkJ between Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Road:
Corrie: Item No. 16 is a continued Public Hearing from June 5th. This is a
request for rezone of 8.29 acres from L-O to C-G for Waltman Court subdivision
by John Goade south of Troutner Business Park between Waltman Lane and
Ten Mile Road~ At this time I will open, or continue the Public Hearing and
reopen it. Staff comments? Oh, I think there's another one.
Bird: Yes.
Corrie: Okay. Then number 17 is also a request for Preliminary Plat approval for
6 building lots. So, I will also open that continued Public Hearing. Both 16 and 17 ~
Shari.
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. This is for the property located south of Troutner
Business Park~ It also has what is known as the old Waltman home that is
located on Waltman Lane. Originally the applicant had requested zoning of L-Q
and C-G and it was in a specific configuration that went with the configuration of
the lots that were proposed for the plat. However, the applicant has reconsidered
the market for those properties and is now requesting to zone the entire property
C-G instead of the mixture of L-Q and C-G. Initially when they had come in. We
had wanted the L-O particularly adjacent to the existing residential areas.
However, since that time the Ada County Highway District has constructed some
very large drainage ponds in part of the area that would have been L-O. We don't
really have the desire to have that be a mixture at this point Also the plat was
being revised to be more marketable to a wide range of potential users. The
property is also along Ten Mile Creek. As part of the development agreement for
the project, the applicant had agreed to dedicate a pathway area adjacent to Ten
Mile Creek. The applicant has submitted a position statement regarding 2 items.
Maybe Tom can address this pathway. Item 4, the owner agrees, states that he
agrees to deed the dedicated pathway to the city but the development of the
pathway would be by others. What was written in the comments was that, that
was suppose to be coordinated with the Meridian Parks director, whatever was
going to happen with that pathway. There was a statement in the comments in
our staff report that said the pedestrian walkway should be installed as part of
this development. Coordinate pathway and fencing details with the parks director~
We had also requested that a landscape plan be submitted as part 0 the plat and
that it should be received one week prior to the hearing with City Council. I don't
believe that I have a copy of that unless Will has a copy of the landscape plan in
it's file. WaitJ let me double check that. The other item that has been brought up
by the applicant, our comments were that they had to provide evidence that they
had put into trust funds with Ada County Highway District for the construction of
the bridge at the end of Corporate Drive. We did have significant discussions
about this the first time this came through and Ada County Highway District did
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 52
~.:..
c"
finally agree to participate in the construction of half of that bridge over Ten Mile
Creek because we did not want the entire cost of that bridge to fall on the
property owner to the south. So, we would ask that number 1 0 remain as it is.
We do support the rezone to entirely e-G. We would also support removing the
restriction that all uses on this property would have to go through the Conditional
Use Permit process and allow the uses that are shown in the zoning schedule of
use control as being permitted to proceed without the requirement for a separate
Conditional Use. With that, I'll turn it over to Tom Kuntz, park director and have
him explain his discussions regarding Ten Mile Creek.
Kuntz: Mayor and Council, thank you. We met on site with the applicant and
walked the property and actually put some stakes in the ground to set so the
surveyors can come in and actually do a legal description on the parcel that will
contain the pathway. I think the only issue that we would like to comment on is
contained in the Planning and Zoning Commission's comments, No.4 on page 3
and also in staff comments, No.4 on page 2 of their April 30th comments. That is
where it comments about a pedestrian walkway should be installed as part of this
development. The question being who's paying for the installation of the
pathway~ Staff would be comfortable recommending gravel base only at this
point. Not a hard surface but we feel like the developer should be responsible for
providing that gravel base at this time as part of the application. Thank you.
Corrie: Any other staff comments? Developer of this?
Goade: Mr. Mayor, Council. I'm John Goade. I reside at 5855 Becky Drive~ I do
own this property. It's a small piece of property and if we get too many demands
of what I have to do, isn't viable to do. The bridge has no value to me as far as
the development. The pathway, I could probably go along with Mr~ Kuntz's
suggestion on the gravel. I don't have any other-
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: John, I understand then that you agree to put down on the pathway, the
rock on that as part of the development agreement?
Goade: Four inches of road mix, yes.
Bird: Four inches of road mix, okay. I do have a statement regarding the bridge~ I
agree when we have subdivisions come in we don't make, if they stop at a point,
we don't make them go through it for the road. That property definitely don't need
that bridge. The only people that's going to benefit is the people in the south.
When they develop then they can pay for it. That's my opinion.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
(/......
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page S3
Corrie: Mr. Anderson..
Anderson: Does that have to have a bridge or can it just be tiled with pipe --?
Goade: It depends on what the county calls for. It probably could be a large
culvert.
Corrie: Sharif have we talked - go back to the other one. Right there, between
one and five that comes down there and it goes across the ditch. Is that what
we're talking about?
Bird: Right there~
Corrie: Okay~ Would that eventually, commercial on the other side I would
imagine.
Goade: That will eventually lead to the freeway frontage I'm sure.
Corrie: Is not the trust fund for half of that bridge?
Bird: From ACHD?
Corrie: Yeah.
Bird: It's a trust fund for half the bridge?
(inaudible discussion)
Stiles: I don't know what formula they had worked out but they did finally agree
that they should be responsible for half the cost of that crossing.
Bird: Shari, until we get plans in from those other 2 properties, or one of those
properties, I don't think they're owned by the same people below there. Are they?
Goade: NO. The one directly ac-ross -the .d.itch .is a.n -individual and then the
freeway property-
Bird: I don't know why we would even want to - I would just stop the road there
and not even worry about the bridge.
Stiles: It's a major collector that will be required to connect It's going to go
down to Waltman Lane and serve all of that area south of Waltman Lane.
-Bird: Th.at'.s very true .but -why put the bridge in now? We don't have the ground
over there. Are you just going to come it over and stop it?
/.~ ... : ..
j . .
\:. .
('
Meridian City Council Meering
June 19, 200 I
Page 54
Stiles: It's not to - the trust fund is not to build the bridge. It's to make sure the
funds are in place so that when the property that's south does develop, that half
of those funds are already in place.
Bird: From ACHD?
Stiles: I don't know what the formula was but they did agree finally to
participate.
Bird: I just don't see this developer having to pay for a bridge that doesn't help
his property at all. It could be years down the road before the other properties
develop.
Corrie: I guess my question Keith, would be a legal one. Do we have anything
to say about it? I mean, we don't have anything to do with roads, but I don't know
whether we can or not.
Bird: I don't know how we can force somebody to put a bridge on -
Corrie: I don't know that we can~ That's what I'm saying. If that's a requirement
of ACHD then, I don't see how we can force him to but they might. I dontt know.
Goade: I'm required to put a turn around at the end of the road as it is shown
now~
Corrie: Okay. What they're-
Goade: For emergency vehicles, whatever. No bridge.
Corrie: They're aSking for that trust fund in case somebody happens - They're
going to get your money is what --. They're looking at long term.
Goade: I haven't heard anything from the county about it.
Anderson: Did they buy any right-ct.-way or easements from you for the road?
Goade: Yesf they did buy some right-af-way.
Anderson: For which road? Corporate?
Goade: Part of Corporate yes.
Bird: I recall originally we had a discussion on this Mayor. You brought the point
up and it was ACHD was involved in that and it was a turn around that this
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 55
developer had to put at the end of that deal. Yeaht you're right. I remember that
now. On the trust, I don't know how that goes.
Corrie: I have no trouble with that turn around myself. I don't know how we can
Bird: Yeah. I don't know how we can force somebody to put a bridge in when we
don't have anything to sayan the road~
Stiles: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. Stiles.
Stiles: When this first came up we had to struggle with Ada County Highway
District and especially Mr. Goades representative, Tony Hickey at that time, did
work with Ada County Highway District to get them to agree to participate in the
cost of that bridge. Now, if it were several people and they had some kind of a
funding mechanism in place to share the cost with that whole area down there,
that would be one thing. But if that one R- T which shown in the picture would
decide to develop by themselves, the cost to put in that bridge by themselves
would be a lot to put on one person. I don't know if Mr. Goade recalls what the
agreement was with Ada County Highway District and the fact that they did
eventually make the commitment to participate in the cost of that bridge and what
kind of formula they might have worked out. Maybe they didn't get that far.
Goade: I'm not aware of any commitment that they made.
Stiles: It would be in the previous file for this subdivision.
Bird: Actually, Shari, if ACHD is going to make that a collector then my personal
opinion is they can foot the bill because that R-T section and that other place can
use Waltman Lane to get access to their property if they want to develop it.
Stiles: It's a substandard street It doesn't even meet any requirements.
Bird: I know that. I mean you know, I just don't see how you can force this
developer to have to put any money into that bridge~ Like the Mayor says, we
don't have much to say on that.. I can't see as we can make that a condition
either of the approval because we don't have a sayan that with ACHD.
Stiles: (inaudible)
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor~
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
(.
\..
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 56
De Weerd: I guess, you know they city needs to at least take a stand. There
are a thousand houses to the west of there that have no access. It's just
ludicrous. That eventually will be one of them. It is a necessity. If you have a stub
over here that goes nowhere and why it does go nowhere for this long when
there's all those houses to the west. I don't understand that since we're not the
road authority. Right there and that's what that bridge is going to service.
Bird: How's that bridge going to service that?
De Weerd: Well, because it's going to go through that piece of property. I
think ACHD needs to start planning how to get those people out of that
subdivision because they only have one route out and that's the Linder. That is
going to help facilitate it at some point. Every other developer has to pay for
roads too. Yes, you can tell we don't plan them.
Bird: The problem is they pay for the roads within their subdivision. He's going to
be paying for his roads within his~ I just don't see the necessity with the bridge. I
don't see where it helps his development at all.
De Weerd: It's not our requirement but I see the logic to it.
Corrie: It's definitely a problem. Only one way in and out of that place down
there. I get calls on it every week.
De Weerd: Well, yeah.
Corrie: (inaudible)
De Weerd: Do you give them ACHD's phone number?
Corrie: Yes.. As a matter of fact I have.
Bird: Then ACHD says Meridian why did you approve it?
De Weerd: Who was on here?
Bird: Wasn't me.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: What's the landscape --- you said something about the landscape plan
wasn't in ?
Stiles: We had requested a landscape plan. I don't where John is on that.
Goade: Was that a landscape plan for the development or for the path?
( .
Meridian City Council Meering
June 19, 200 I
Page 57
Stiles: I believe it was just for the development, the subdivision and if there was
any adjacent to the pathway.
Goade: I took it as the path. It is not here but I will get it in for the subdivision.
Stiles: There are landscape requirements adjacent to roadways, right-af-ways.
Goade: Okay, I'll get that in.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor. I don't know what you can do with the rezone. I would like to
clarify this with Ada County Highway District and see what their requirements
were because their letter just says the conditions of June 2000 remain in effect
and I don't have those with me. I would like to see their take on it because I
guess I feel that I fought pretty hard about this bridge issue and I want to make
sure that it's taken care and not to put an undue burden on Mr.. Goade~ You know
how likely it is that a bridge crossing of Ten Mile Creek will be put on any
planning programs for Ada County Highway District unless they made some
commitment to have impact fee offsets to help contribute toward that bridge~ It's
also very vital that that bridge continue across Ten Mile Creek because that's
where the pathway is proposed to go. Once it gets to the --~ The pathway is
proposed to go adjacent to Ten Mile Creek up to this point. I'm not sure which
side of the road it would be on~ Probably on this south side. Then the bridge
would continue the pathway at which time the pathway would be on the south
side of Ten Mile Creek. SO, it is very important to the City of Meridian as well as
those properties south. You say that he's not going to get any benefit out of that
bridge but once it connects to the land and depending on what kind of
businesses locate in here, they're going to have a lot more business than they
would if they have to go back through this maze of trying to get through Waltman
Lane or coming off Franklin Road. It's much better access wise. I would like to at
least be given the opportunity to find out what Ada County Highway District's final
approval letter was on the previous one that they're referring to~
Bird; Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Shari, would you feel comfortable if we were to pass him on it with the
condition of the ACHD agreement as far as the bridge and road?
Stiles: Sure. If Mr. Goade is happy with that.
Bird: Of 2000, June 2, 2000, which I believe that's when it was. I remember us
having a meeting. I remember that thing being brought up. Gary's got it.
Corrie: Where does No.4 lot, whereJs their driveway? Is it down in front of 3?
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 58
Goade: No. It comes off from Waltman Lane~
Corrie: Oh, I see.
Bird: Is that the lot that the house is on?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Anybody care to sing?
De Weerd: I could clear the room.
Bird: I could clear the room for you. Turn out the lights, the party's over?
Corrie: Yeah.
Bird: We need Don Meredith.
Corrie: Sorry, John to hold you up here.
Goade: No problem.
Corrie: I think they're still looking for the answer to Keith's question. (inaudible)
Bird': Jo.hn, what d.id the ACDH do with the storm drains there? What's going to
be resolved there?
Goade: As far as?
Bird: Where it's right in the middle of the road.
Goade: the drain itself?
Bird: Yeah.
Goade: They messed up the sewer from southwest fifth and also Meridian Road_
So, the sewer's going to have to come in up by lot four across the creek and it's
going to have to be deeper and run up southwest fifth extended and back up
Corporate Drive to serve the old Meridian rental property up there when they
develop that. So, they created us a lot more expense there.
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. We have a letter dated October 23,2000 to Tony
Hickey from Ada County Highway District. IT says with regard to sharing of the
cost of a future crossing at Ten Mile Drain, the district will participate in the cost
of this facility to the following extent 13.04 percent of the stream crossing. This is
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 59
the share of the total. street construction .to be paid .by the district because
Corporate Drive is a collector and this I the difference in cost between a local
commercial industrial street and a standard collector street. A proportionate
share of half of the balance of the cost, based on the land area of the parcel
owned by the district compared to the total land area in the subdivision~ That's
not a sentence. According to the Preliminary Plat this would be 1.10 divided by
6.65. 16.5 percent of the development's share of the crossing; This factor should
be verified using the areas contained in the final subdivision plat. It appears, their
total. they're showing would be 20.24 percent of the cost of that bridge. This is
signed by Larry Sail.
Corrie: That would be one fifth of it.
Stiles: Then it goes on to say, we will collaborate with the city engineer to
determine the appropriate design of the crossing and it's estimated cost. The
crossing will be installed by the developers of the property on the south. side of
Ten Mile Drain when Corporate Drive is extended. The developer of Waltman
Court subdivision will be required to deposit 79.8 percent of one half the
estimated cost of the stream crossing with the district~ The district will use the
funds to compensate the developer of the south side of the Ten Mile Drain who
will extend Corporate Drive across the drain when they develop their property.
I'm not sure exactly what that says.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: It sounds like John's 20 percent, the others 30 this is 40. Then he has to
pay 79 percent of the 40 which would bring it down to a little over 20 percent
(inaudible). I only went to Pharmacy school. I can only count to five.
Anderson: I think I got it. Roughly, you're paying 40 percent.
Corrie: Roughly that's about what it amounts to.
Bird: 40 percent now.
(inaudible discussion)
Anderson: Were you aware of that letter of that condition?
Goade: No, I wasn't.
Corrie: Who was that letter to, Shari? Us?
Stiles: It was to Tony Hickey, the realtor that was working with Mr. Goade.
Corrie: OhJ okay.
(... .<
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, ZOO I
Page 60
Anderson: SOt does. that change your opinion on everything. ACHD is paying 20
percent and you're paying 40?
G.oade: Well, yeah. I donJt know that that changes my opinion but I'll just have to
see what we can do about it.
Bird: This would have to be resolved before Gary can sign off on the Final Plat.
Goade: Right.
Bird: There would have to be something put in a trust or something before Brad
or Gary can sig n off.
Corrie: Unless, I'm sadly mistaken you can make that a motion and go with. that,
with the staff and ACHD based upon that figure -~.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: -- Well, yeah. I'm just (inaudible) a discussion here. Okay. Anything else
John?
Goade: No~
Bird: Thank you.
Corrie: Thank you John~ Is there anyone else who'd like to issue testimony? I
know the only one that (inaudible) but anybody else? Okay~
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Okay. Shari, after reading that does that satisfy your condition in this deal.
that you had wanted to see ACHD's and is that satisfactory to you?
Stiles: Yes. I guess as far as the request by Mr. Goade to change those 2 items,
we would recommend that those items remain as they are currently in the
recommendation.
Corrie: That's just for the gravel base on the path.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay~ Is there any other discussion?
Bird: I have none.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 61
( . .
(~......
t<...... .
Corrie: I'll entertain a. motion then, if YOu. so desire to close. the Public Hearing
on item 17 and 18.
Bird: 16 and 17.
Corrie: 16 and 17, yeah. rm sorry.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we close the Public Hearing for the requested rezone of 8.29
acres from L-Q to C-G for Waltman Court subdivision by John Goade.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion been made and second. to close item No. 16 rezone 01--
004 for Waltman Court subdivision. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all
those in favor say aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Further discussion?
De Weerd: No.
Corrie: Okay. Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the request for rezone of 8.29 acre from L-O to C-G
for Waltman Court subdivision by John Goade south of Troutner Business Park
between Waltman Lane and Ten Mile Road and for the Attorney to draw up the
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order with staff
comments.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion's been made and seconded to approve the request for
rezone 004 with staff comments, Any further discussion? Mr. Berg, roll call vote
please.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 62
Corrie: I'll entertain a. motion. now on the continued Public Hearing closing on
the request for Preliminary Plat.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we close the Public Hearing for the request for Preliminary Plat
approval on 6 building lots and 1 other lot on 8~29 acres in a proposed C-G zone
for proposed Waltman Court subdivision by John and Sandra Goade~
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: Okay, Motion made and second to close the continued. Public Hearing
on the request for Preliminary Plat PP01-007. Any further discussion? All those in
favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Any further discussion? I'll entertain a motion on the request for
Preliminary Plat.
Bird: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve the Preliminary Plat approval for 6 building lots and 1
other lot on 8.29 acres in a proposed C-G zone for proposed Waltman Court
subdivision by John and Sandra Goade and for the attorney to draw up the
proper papers and to include staff comments and developerJs comments.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion been made to approve the request for Preliminary. Plat on PP01-
007 and for the attorney to draw up the proper papers with inclusion of the staffs
comments and the developer's comments... Any further discussion? Hearing
none, roll call vote Mr~ Berg~
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Birdf aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 18.
Continued Public Hearing. from June 5, 2001 : RZ 01-004
Request for a rezone from an R-8 to L-Q zone for Meridian Water
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19; 200 I
Page 63
(:...
Department by Meridian Water Department - 2235 Northwest 8th
Street:
Corrie: Item No. 18 is a continued Public Hearing from June the 5th. Request for
rezone from R~8 to L-Q zone for Meridian Water Department by the Meridian
Water Department 2235 Northwest Eighth Street. At this time I. will open the
continued Public Hearing. Staff, comments.
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. This is for the property that currently houses the
water department. They desire to make some changes to the interior of the
building and wanted to make sure they are in compliance with our ordinances. It
is currently in an R-8 zanet which does not permit the use. So, John Shawcroft of
the sewer department requested that we get the paperwork together to make that
an L-Q zone so they would be compliant with our ordinances~ We would
recommend approval.
Anderson: Mr~ Mayor_
Bird: Who's representing the developer? Brad, or Gary?
Stiles: Brad.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: I just have one question Shari? When are they going to start this
project?
Stiles: Which one? The interior remodel?
Anderson: Yeah, that one.
Stiles: I believe that the public works director informed. me th.at that might have
already been occurring out there.
Corrie: Thank you.
Stiles: Unbeknownst to the Planning and Zoning Department.
Bird: How about the City Engineer, Brad?
De Weerd: Yeah, didntt they get a permit?
Stiles: They did not receive a certificate of zoning compliance.
/
l
~
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~2001
Page 64
Corrie: I assume that the applicant has spoken then?
Bird: He's hanging his head.
Corrie: Is there anyone from the pUblic like to issue testimony on this very
serious development that has come before the City Council tonight? Hearing
none, I hope the Council's wise in making their decision correctly here.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor6
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I move we close the Public Hearing.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing. All those in favor
say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Discussion? H'earing none, I'll entertain a motion for the request for
rezone.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I move that we approve the request for rezone from R-8 to L-O. for the
Meridian Water Department and for the attorney to draw up the appropriate
findings and to include all staff comments.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion been made and seconded to approve the request for rezone, for
the attorney to draw up the proper forms and all the staff comments be included,
for what they could hear. Any further discussion?
Anderson: Can we add another condition? They should be slapped?
Bird: Yeah.
Corrie: Mr. Berg, roll call vote.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
(/
/.~.
(V
'-.
.Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19) 200 I
Page 65
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 19.
Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 200.1: VAR 01-005-
Request for a variance of the rear property setback from 15 feet to
11_5 feet for property to be used for single-family dwelling by John
Flaherty Construction, Inc. - 2421 East Weir Creek Drive:
Corrie: Item No. 19 has been dropped. We will need to have the proper request
and motion on item 19.
De Weerd: Do you want to open it first?
Corrie: WeIlJ--
Bird: No~ You don't.
Corrie: Yeah. I guess we could~ This is a continued Public Hearing" on a. request
for variance on a rear property setback from 15 feet to 11.5 feet to be used for
single family dwelling.
***End of Side Four***
Corrie: ~- Motion to close the Public Hearing.
Bird: So moved.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing. All those in favor
say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: I'll entertain a motion to drop -
Bird: Mr~ Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: After receiving a letter on June 18th from Kyle Basell, superintendent of
John Flaherty Construction requesting that we pull the application for the request
for variance of the rear property setback from 15 feet to 11.5 feet at 2421 East
Weir Creek Drive, I move that we pull it from the agendas.
De Weerd: Second.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 66
Corrie: Okay. Motion's been made and second to approve the-
De Weerd: Not approve, drop.
Bird: Pull.
Corrie: Yeah, but you've got to approve the drop, don't you?
De Weerd: Oh} yeah~ Sorry.
Corrie: Okay. - to approve the request to pull the application on the request for
variance 01...005. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Yes, Ma'am..
De Weerd: Does that mean that they will be taking that structure down? Is that
what this means?
Stiles: What happened? I don't have a copy of that letter so I don't know.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: IT was received today. We are requesting that the variance application be
dropped for John Flaherty Construction on lot 38, block 14 of the Thousand
Spring subdivision 2421 East Weir Creek Drive. Respectfully, Kyle Basalt
superintendent John Flaherty president John Flaherty Construction.
De Weerd: I'd like staff to follow up with this and make sure, since they're not
applying for the variance, they're going to take the cause for the variance down.
Anderson: How do you know it was built?
De Weerd: I know it's built by the letters we've received from the neighbors. I
haven't gone out to look but I assumed by the letters-
Stiles: There's pictures showing it
De Weerd: Oh, there it is.
(inaudible discussion)
coo
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 67
Item 20.
Public Hearing: PP 01-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval
of 336 building lots and 58 other lots on 175.91 acres in proposed
R-4 and C-G zones for proposed Bridgetower Crossing
Subdivision by Primeland Devel~pment, Co. LLP - north of Ustick
and east of Ten Mile Roads:
Item 21.
Public Hearing: CUP 01-006 Request for Conditional Use Permit
for 692 single-family lots, 59 townhomes, 17 office lots and 10
commercial lots on 370.55 acres in proposed R-4 and C-G zones
for proposed Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision by Primeland
Develop.ment, Co. LLP - north of Ustick and east of Ten Mile
Roads:
Corrie: Okay. Item No. 20, am I right there? Yeah~ 20, 21 has been requested to
move to July 3, 01. So I will open the Public Hearing on item 20 and 21, request
for Preliminary Plat and also request for Conditional Use Permit. Is there anyone
at this time that would like to issue testimony? You have a chance to do it You'll
also have a chance on July 3rd. Okay, hearing no comments, I'll entertain a
motion to continue the Public Hearing on the request for Preliminary Plat and
also the request for Conditional Use Permit on Bridgetower Crossing subdivision,
item 20 and 21.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: I would make a motion that we continue the Public Hearing on the
Preliminary Plat 01-005 for 336 building lots and 58 other lots on 175.91 acres in
a proposed R-4 and C-G zone for the proposed Bridgetower Crossing
subdivision.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to continue the Preliminary Plat PP01-005 on
item No. 20 the Public Hearing~ Any further discussion? All those in favor of the
motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: I would make a motion that we continue the Public Hearing until July
3rd on CUP 01-006 for the proposed Bridgetower Crossing subdivision_
(:. .
fv(:~Y~. .
t. ..
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 68
Bird: Second~
Corrie: Okay. Motion made and second to continue the Public Hearing on
request for Conditional Use Permit No~ 01-006 until July 3, 2001. All those in
favor of the motion say aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 9.
Tabled from June 5, 2001: CUP 01-010 Request for a
Conditional Use Permit for a free-standing coffee hut with a drive-
thru in a proposed C-G zone for proposed Moxie Java by T JBJ,
Inc~ - 1975 East Fairview:
Item 22.
Public Hearing: VAR 01-008 Request for variance for the
reduction of two required parking spaces for Moxie Java by T JBJ,
Inc. - 1975 East Fairview:
Corrie: Item No. 22 and item No. C, no No.9 I believe it was wasn't it?
Bird: Yes.
Corrie: Yes. Nine, so we need to take up 9 first.
Bird: No~ We need to take up 22 first.
Corrie: 22 because that's the variance. Okay~ This is a Public Hearing on the
request for variance by the reduction of 2 required parking spaces for Moxie
Java, T JBJ, Inc. 1975 east Fairview. At this point J'IJ open the Public Hearing on
the variance request. Staff comments first.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and CounciL This is for a stand alone building to be operated
as a drive through facility for Moxie Java. It would be located in front of the
Econo Lube and Tune on Fairview Avenue.. You have the recommendations from
the Planning and Zoning Commission. They will be required to have a variance
from their parking requirements. Econo Lube and Tune is only one lot out of 4 in
the subdivision~ While they may exceed their parking requirements for the Econo
Lube and Tune, should that use be changed to something else, they would have
some pretty severe parking problems there. The Planning and Zoning
Commissions recommendation was that they add 2 more parking stalls or they
apply for this variance~ That is what the applicant has done. The ordinance
requires that for drive thru windows, 5 parking spaces per window would be
required. I'm not sure if they changed that. Todd's here tonight. I don't know if
they changed this - we say a lot of problems perhaps with the double drive thru
and some of the turning movements~ If there should be stacking with this parking
stalls here it would be a very strange configuration for a 2 way drive thru~
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 69
(inaudible discussion)
Stiles: The applicant has stated from the audience that they are going to the
single which would help a lot with their site plan. We would also like to note, I
know we're still on the variance -
(inaudible discussion)
Stiles: -- The Conditional Use Permit is not a Public Hearing because it is in a
commercial zone so it only requires one Public Hearing at Planning and Zoning. I
would like, since the applicant is proposing this site that he work with the property
owner and the Econo Lube and Tune to remove the existing banners and all
sorts of signage that is currently there that is in violation of the ordinance. We
would expect that to be taken care of prior to the erection of that building.
Corrie: Any questions of staff?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay, applicant. Come forward, give your name, address.
Mason: I'm Todd Mason. I'm at 1566 Shenandoah Boise Idaho 83712~ On the
stacking, we originally had put an application in at P&Z for a double drive thru but
you can see the way - . We had resubmitted it at last minute with just the single
drive thru because that was what the staff report had recommended us do. So,
that's what we had went ahead and done. We're not even asking for a double
drive thru. We're just asking for the single drive thru. As far as you know working
with Darryn Larson on getting the banners removed and stuff. You know I've
talked to him about that. That wouldn't be any problem at alL
Corrie: You're still reducing to 2 required parking spaces?
Mason: Yeah. That's our only option. That's what we have to do~ Econo Lube
doesn't use} I don't know if you've ever paid any attention but they never use any
of those front parking spots at all. They've got as you can see 4 or 5 there and
then they've got a lot of parking in the back area also that they normally use
because it's more accessible on the back then it is actually in the front. So, if
they've got an extra vehicle, they actually park them in the back instead of
parking them all the way out front.
Corrie: Okay. Any comments or questions from Council?
Bird: I have none.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19; 200 I
Page 70
Corrie: Okay~ Thanks Todd. Is there anyone from the public that would like to
issue testimony at this request? Okay, hearing none, Council, questions,
discussion?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion then to close the Public Hearing on
the variance request.
De Weerd: So moved.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing on the variance
request 008 on the Moxie Java. Any further discussion? All those in favor say
aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Discussion? Hearing non, I'll entertain a motion then.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the request for a variance for the reduction of 2
required parking spaces for Moxie Java by T JBJ Incorporated at 1975 East
Fairviewt Meridian] and the attorney to draw up the proper papers~
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion made and second to approve the request for variance for 2
required parking spaces for Moxie Java VAR 01 M008 and the attorney to draw up
the proper papers. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: 9, going back to that. I guess it would be 22C. This is tabled request for a
Conditional Use Permit for a free standing coffee hut with a drive thru in a
proposed C-G zone for proposed Moxie Java, CUP 01-010. Staff comments, any
further comments?
Stiles: Mr. Mayor please incorporate my comments from the previous Public
Hearing.
('
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 71
Corrie: Okay. So be it. Councilt discussion? Hearing. nonet .1'11 entertain a.motion
then on the request for CUP.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs.. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I move that we approve the CUP for a. free standing coffee hut for
the proposed Moxie Java in a C_G zone, to incorporate all staff comments to ask
the Attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and
Decision of Order~
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Motion's been made and second to approve the request for Conditional
Use Permit No. 01-010 for Moxie Java, for the Attorney to draw up the proper
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law incorporating staff comments~ Any
further discussions? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 23.
Item 24.
Item 25.
Public Hearing: VAR 01-007 Request for a variance to exceed
the maximum 1,000 foot block length for proposed Macaile
Meadows Subdivision by Hillview land Development, LLC -
south of Fairview Avenue, north of Pine Street and % mile west of
Cloverdale Road:
Public Hearing: AZ 01-005 Request for annexation and zoning of
28.59 acres from RUT to R-8 for proposed Macaile Meadows
Subdivision by Hillview Land Development, LLC - south of
Fairview and west of Cloverdale Roads:
Public Hearing: PP 01-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval
of 115 building lots and 15 other lots on 28959 acres in a proposed
R-8 zone for proposed Macaile Meadows Subdivision by Hillview
Land Development, LLC - south of Fairview and west of Cloverdale
Roads:
Corrie: I guess we have a Public Hearing No. 23, 24 and 25. Request for
variance on Macaile Meadows subdivision, request for annexation and zoning on
the Macaile Meadows subdivision and request for a Preliminary Plat. At this time
I will open the Public Hearing~ Is there anyone here who would like to issue
(~n'..~. ..
coo .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 2001
Page 72
testimony? We will continue to the July the 3rd meeting. Hearing none, Council,
oh I'm sorry ~ I apologize. Yes sir.
Unidentified: Could you repeat what you wanted a response on, Mr~ Mayor?
Corrie: We have a variance, an annexation and zoning and a Preliminary Plat
all in one~ You can comment on all 3 singly or you can also do it the 3rd.
Unidentified: Actually, we would like to comment on all 3 if possible. I would
appreciate it if the Council can handle it tonight~ There are 15 or so folks from the
neighborhood that would like to speak also.
Corrie: Now, you know you can do that the 3rd of July as well, but not on the
same thing?
Unidentified: I think today would be much better if you don't mind~ The folks are
here and wetd like to-
Corrie: Let me ask a legal question. Is that requested by the applicant, since we
don't have an applicant testifying here.
Unidentified: I am the applicant.
Corrie: Oh, you are the applicant?
Unidentified: Yes.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor. If I can interject, I think we're a little off track here. What you
said at the beginning of the meeting was that whatever pointt cutoff comes,
whatever hearings are left would go to June 27th, not July 3rd.
Corrie: Okay.
Nichols: There's been no request by anybody to move this to a specific date. He
would only be moved in the event that you cutoff the hearings. So, if we don't get
through all the hearings, usually the cutoff time is 11 :00. If we don't get through
all the hearings until 11 :00 you can cut them off at that time and continue them to
the 27th of June. I believe that would be your process.
Corrie: Okay. I suppose, Council if you want to cut this off at 11 :00 and we're
not through, youTre going to come back the 28th and finish this up anyway. 11m
going to leave it up to the Council. Usually we ~Iose it at 1 0:00 because we have
some other business that's coming down here tonight. I guess, Council can I
have some comment from you on this? Do you want to move this on to the 27th?
Because like I say we do have some other that we need to go through.
{\
//...~ ~
(: .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 73
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess I now know what all these people are sitting here for. I
would say let's cut it off at 11 :00 and see what we can get done and allow the
people to testify.
McCandless: Mr~ Mayor~ I agree.
Bird: I agree with them~
Anderson: Mr. Mayor. I would agree if we could maybe limit some of the time
frames if we have that many people if we could cut them to 3 minutes of
testimony. That way we could hear the majority of them tonight and then nobody
would have to come back --~
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay. Due to the time, this is what we normally do anyway. So, the
developer has 5 and the other people have 3 minutes and you're welcome to
come back if we don't get finished. If we finish and give you a judgement tonight,
then we won't be here the 27th.
Unidentified: All the better. Thanks9 So, is the Public Hearing open now?
Corrie: It is.
Unidentified: Thank you.
Corrie: Yeah, but we-
Un identified: I'm sorry, staff.
Corrie: Hang on. We're going to have staff make comments first
Stiles: And, you opened all 3 of these?
Corrie: All 3, yes.
Stiles: Okay. The first one deals with the maximum 1000 foot block length. We
would probably need to revise what the applicant has written in. I believe this is
the latest and greatest layout of this subdivision. The maximum block lengths are
exceeded pretty much every block. This block exceeds the maximum block
length as well as this. They are restricted on the south and on the west side
because of existing development~ There's Crossroads subdivision that is fully
{ .
t:..:.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 74
developed here. A subdivision that we recently rezoned to R-4. There are 278
lots. To the south is Westdale subdivision. YouJII recall there is Westdale Park
subdivision No~ 1 which is in Boise City and Westdale Park subdivision No.2
which is in the City of Meridian. The only access at this time, I don't think a stub
street to Pine has been constructed south of, in this Westdale Park subdivision
No.2. So, currently the access is shown coming from Cloverdale Road down
Driftwood and would enter the property at this location. All of these including this
blockt this block, they're all exceeding the 1000 foot block length. That's what
theyJre requesting the variance from. I'm going to have to rely on the applicant to
explain the various iterations of what has happened with this additional road. I
don't know if this is a stub. The Seventh Day Adventist Church owns - this was
the back half of the Seventh Day Adventist property. You see the church facility
here. I believe, I'm not sure it's a daycare I think back in this area. They did not
want a road going through their property~ It appears from the current layout,
they're proposing some kind of street through to Cloverdale. I think that was in
response to Westdale Park subdivision's concerns that all of the traffic for this, I
believe it's 115 lots, would be accessing through their subdivision. There is the
proposal to - I don't know if it's paved or gravel, or what~ I would be concerned if
it were only a gravel road going back to Cloverdale. The applicant's
representative has stated that it is paved. They are requesting a zoning of R-8.
Westdale Park subdivision is zoned R-8. The Crossroads subdivision, although
zoned R-4 when it was approved it was zoned I-L~ The Planning and Zoning staff
submitted an application to rezone that to R-4. It doesn't quite meet the
requirements of R-4. It is somewhat of a planned development because of the
open space in Crossroads Subdivision. They do have frontages as low as 70 feet
but all those lots do meet the 8,000 square foot requirement. This is at the very
edge of our area of impact. This is the boundary line. North of this, you may
recall, Bill Clark came in with a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to
change that from a single family residence to mixed use. He had requested high
density but it was finally decided to be a mixed use. Eventually these accesses
will go through that property and get back to the road that comes out on the east
side of Wal-Mart. The road between Wal-Mart and the cemetery there. There's a
lot of people here to testify tonight I think the applicant has done a good job of
trying to work with the neighborhood and trying to allay their fears. I guess we'll
hear how well they did, tonight with that. We would recommend approval of this
project with all staff and agency conditions and also on the variance to reflect the
blocks that are currently shown on this instead of the ones that are noted in the
application. Do you have any questions for me?
Corrie: Council, any questions?
De Weerd: Not at this point~
Corrie: I will pretty soon. Okay, applicant?
(
(~.
\.
Meridian City Council M~ting
June 19, 200 I
Page 75
Butler: Shari could you put the subdivision back up? Mark Butler 52 North
Second Street Eagle, representing the applicant, HillView Development
Company. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. I'd like to talk a little bit about how
we1ve designed the property to be compatible with the adjacent properties~ Also,
before going into that, though, I think this is a subdivision that's really good for
you to see as compared to a lot of the other ones you've been seeing lately in the
fact that this is an in-fill development. Hopefully that will help you in your
decision, understanding that we're not going way out to the north, way down to
the south. We're filling a hole thafs actually in the city. Shari mentioned the
boundary of Boise City is right here. The property to the south is developed with
the R-8 standards. It's got an R-8 zone. The property to the west was developed
as a PUD has got R-8 standards, lots that don't meet the R-4 standards. The
church is to the east. The property to the north could be developedJ the way I
understand it, with not only mixed use but that mixed use incorporating
approximately 15 dwelling units per acre. I don't know if that's a fact or not. What
we've tried.. to is to develop the project so that we have a transition between
existing properties~.and what we're doing here. If you look at the number of lots to
the south here (inaudible). This particular subdivision here, Westdale, there's 19
lots along the south boundary, our south boundary. We've incorporated 9 lots
along the south boundary by designing the subdivision with cui de sacs to the
south. As you look at lot sizes, the smallest lot along the south side existing is
approximately 8300 square feet. The largest being this, being close to 14,000
square feet. The southern 300 feet or so of our property, our lots vary from, the
ones over on the side are about 7,000 square feet. Close to 14,000. The lots that
actually bound the property to the south vary from approximately 9,000 square
feet to 14,000. So, the number of lots is far less on our side compared to the
south and the lot sizes are very similar in size compared to the south. The
Planning and Zoning Commission has a condition in the findings that requires us
to have single story homes along the west side and single story homes along the
south side. Thus, providing a better transition between neighborhoods. This plan
is a little bit different in that the original plan that was submitted, and I'm showing
this to illustrate our open space areas. We're planning a park in the center of the
property. We exceed your 5 percent minimum for open space. We're also
planning some common areas along the ends of some of these blocks and at the
roadway that connects into Parkdale. There will be meandering sidewalks, in
particular areas here along the roadways. Not meandering, excuse me, detached
sidewalks in those locations where we're planning the green way. The sidewalk
along the park will be attached. Initially we proposed home sizes using your
code, varying from the 11 00 square feet to the 1200 and then to the 1300 and
larger. Through the process and again, working toward being more compatible
with the neighbors we proposed lot sizes along the west side to be that which is
the minimum in Crossroads, 1350 square feet. Lot sizes along the south side to
be, that which is in the Westdale CC&R requirements minimum, 1500 square
feet. The remainder of the subdivision will have lot) excuse me. Did I say lot
sizes? I always do that, I'm talking about house sizes. The remainder of the
subdivision will have 1301 square foot minimum house size on it Staff had done
c.. ..
(.
......... .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 76
a position statement on some of the issues that were raised in the findings~ I did
a position statement, which I have for you. I've got 8 copies. My issues I think are
very minor. We're in agreement with staffs position statement except we think a
sentence could be added to one to help clarify the conditions and we believe
there was a typo on one. I'll hand those to you now and go over those quickly.
After going over these I'd like to discuss our primary access, which is a road, that
connects to Cloverdale because that was a very important issue to the
neighbors. Position statement, the way I read this, is you had modifications you
had to fill out a separate piece of paper. So, the first 2 pages basically say see
attached~ What's attached is a comment with regard to recommendation No~ 40.
What's in the condition in the findings, in the findings it says the churches must
be landscaped. I think that was supposed to say the chokers must be
landscaped~ We're proposing chokers, which are extended areas of the sidewalk
on this particular location on Westdale to help restrict traffic going east and west
as much as possible on Westdale~ In talking with Brad, the staff planner, he
thought that what the commission wanted was for the south side of our new road
that we're planning, for that to all be landscaped. I put a note here, we don't
recall any comments from the commission to have us landscape the south side
of that road. That's really not within Meridian's jurisdictional authority. That's
actually Boise City. We would hope that you wouldn't extend your authority out
Boise City and understand that this was just merely a typo. No. 42 was a
condition that staff clarified very well with regard to our proposal to barricade this
road off during the infrastructure phase of the development. That is the phase
where we're installing the waterlines and sewer lines and streets. However I
would like to add a sentence to that which says the barricade may be removed
for installation of infrastructure within the existing portion of Parkdale Street~ Just
to clarify the issue because we will have to put the chokers in for onew We're
going to have to go into this roadway to extend the utilities. So, we will have to do
some infrastructure in that. We didn't want to be perceived as going against your
goals, the conditions were for the development~ Quickly before I touch on the
road, which will the last issue. We dealt with staff quite a bit on the variance
request with regard to the block length and had really good support as we still do_
With staff understanding it would be inappropriate to stub into the adjacent
properties here along the perimeter. We did lengthen these lots in this location
here and this location here to narrow this block length and this block length down
to 1000. So, if you measure from the right-of-way line to the right~of-way line we
thought we were at 1000. So, we would argue that point but since staff is
recommending approval anyway and if you're going to approve it, I don't see
where it's worth the argument. But we did make a change in that. The last issue
is regarding the roadway out to Cloverdale. This will be our primary access. This
is not a public roadway. If you had a chance to read the ACHD staff report, it will
be open to the publicp However ACHD has not decided whether or not they want
that to be right-af-way for a public road. There was a lot of discussion with
ACHD. And maybe the better choice for a public road in the fullness of time for it
to possibly maybe be up to Fairview. Or, maybe in a little bit different location
here or maybe realigned. Their concern for potential problem in the future was
.....- :.
{" .
j. .
~:
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19; 200 I
Page 77
that this area here in Boise City is planned for up to 18 units per acre. If this was
a straight road, it could make it easy for a lot of trips, up to maybe 3000 trips a
day to cut through the subdivision to get to the corner once Pine is extended to
Eagle Road. The Dakota Company will likely put in some sort of commercial at
the corner of Eagle Road and Pine. We have agreed to construct the road prior
to the first building permit. ACHD wanted the road constructed prior to the 76th
building permit. That's what the policy manual calls out for to meet their goals
and objectives. Since the neighbors were concerned, we agreed to construct that
road at the very beginning. We had hoped that we bought neighborhood support
with all that we've done, but we notice that 15 people would like to testify against.
So, that's the next phase of this. That pretty much covers my report on the
project. The roadway will be paved to ACHD standards with I believe a 30 foot
width, 24 foot width of asphalt. It will be striped9 It will be signed as a road and
will be constructed before the first building permit is issued_ That's actually one of
the conditions of ACHD. I think you incorporated that, or your commission did
into the findings. I'll stand for any questions at this time.
Corrie: Council, any questions at this time?
Anderson: How wide is that access road going in off Cloverdale?
Butler: 24 foot wide paved roadway. Sufficient for 2 lanes of travel.
Anderson: Who will maintain that since it's private?
Butler: .We will be required to .maintain. We will have to enter into an. agreement
with ACHD which is referred to in your findings and that agreement will require us
to maintain it. ACHD will maintain it.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Mark, is that the road that comes from north of the church there, that goes
into the churches parking lot?
Butler: Actually there's a driveway going to the church parking lot. (inaudible) will
be somewhat reconstructed.
Bird: That's the one you're going to use?
Butler: Yeah. We'll have to extend that obviously because it stops at the -
Bird: It stops at the end of the parking lot back there?
(.....
(':
~..
Meridian City Council Meeti~g
June 19; 200 I
Page 78
-Butler: Yes. If .i-fs ,not the suffic-ient widtht it'll have to be widened and of course
it'll have to be striped.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay~ Thank you.
Butler: Thank you.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay. Weil, it looks like we're going to be coming back the 27th. If
everybody sticks to the 3 minutes we're not going to get through it even at that
time. WeIll get started. We'd appreciate it if you keep to the 3 minutes. We'll time
you up here~ We'll go until 11 :00. Then if we're not through, then we'll have it the
27th. Okay. First off let me askJ is there anybody here that is here to testify for the
subdivision? This is for.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: If you're for the subdivision, not against it
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: we've got a whole bunch of them that are against it but I didn't have
anybody signed up as for it. Okay. Nobody here that's going to testify that they
would like to have the subdivision the way it's been given to us? What is your
name? Holly, okay Holly president of Westdale Homeowners. Holly Turney.
Turney: My name is Holly Turney and I am the president of Westdale
Homeowners Association and I represent the 76 homeowners of Westdale Park
minus those here this evening who would wish to testify for themselves. We also
have a position statement that I would like to give to you. I also have some
diagrams that I will be referring to that I would like to hand out at this time. I will
do my best not to take any more time than necessary. As far as the position
statement goes, we too had a few comments. As Mr. Butler pointed out, No. 40,
we agree should read the chokers must be landscaped. No. 42 we would like it to
read something along the lines of the entrance to Macaile Meadows via Parkdale
must be barricaded as is practical during the construction phase. So, when they
need to un-barricade the road to work on the road and things like that, we would
not expect the barricade to remain in place. No. 31, I would like to have in there,
coordinate the design of these traffic calming devices or these chokers with
Westdale Homeowners Association and design and exact location of traffic
calming devices with district traffic services. This is because it may become
necessary with these chokers being landscaped that we may have to have
individual homeowner agreement to tap into their sprinkler system or line
c. .
t:.. .
{ .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June] 9, 2001
Page 79
somehow to take care of that landscaping appropriately. We had to make an
agreement with them that we would maintain those chokers after they put them
in. So, we need to have that agreement with homeowners. SOf we would really
need to be involved in the design of those and know what they were expecting
and what was going to be expected of us. Other than that we have 2 major
concerns with the proposed Mcaille Meadows subdivision. These concerns are
compatibility with the existing developments in the area and the increased traffic
that this subdivision will generate. Now, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan is an
official policy guide for decisions to guide future development in the city and itfs
area of impact. Goal No.2 of the Comprehensive Plan is to, quote, ensure that
growth and development occur in an orderly fashion in accordance with adopted
policies and procedures governing the use of land, end quote. In the land use
section under residential policies, No. 2.3 U, serves to, quote, protect and
maintain residential neighborhood property values. Improve each neighborhood's
physical condition and enhance it's quality of life for residents, end quote. No. 2.5
U states, quote, encourage compatible in-fill development which will improve
existing neighborhoods, end quote. No. 1.13U of the housing section goes on to
state, quote, in-filling of random vacant lots in substantially developed single
family areas should be considered at densities similar to the surrounding
development, end quote. In the case of the proposed subdivision of Mcaille
Meadows that surrounding development consists of Crossroads Subdivision to
the west, Westdale Park to the south, the Seventh Day Adventist property to the
east and vacant land to the north. You can see this relationship on figure 1 of the
packet that I handed you. Crossroads is zoned R-4 and contains 260 lots~ It is
the largest of the surrounding development being more than 3 times the size of
Westdale Park and more than twice the size of the proposed Mcaille Meadows.
The Seventh Day Adventist property has the church, the school operated by the
church and large field spaces where they allow soccer leagues to play and
practice. Westdale Park contains 76 lots and is zoned R-4. However, it was
developed in terms of overall lot size and house size more towards R-4
standards than R-8. We therefor feel that to uphold the previously stated policies
of the Comprehensive Plan this property should be zoned R-4 thereby requiring
any development occurring on the property to be compatible with the surrounding
developments and protect the property values of the existing homes within those
developments. Inspection of the proposed Mcaille Meadows Preliminary Plat
clearly shows this compatibility is lacking with the R-8 zoning the developers are
asking for. I now direct your attention to figures 2, 3, and 4 in the exhibit I handed
out to you. We have 2 and 3 that are colored and 4 is a chart~ I have figured out
the approximate square footage of each of the 115 lots in Mcaille Meadows and
the 76 in Westdale. Looking at these figures, you will see that I have categorized
lot size in square feet by color and quantified the information according to the
number of lots in each category and the percent of the subdivision that category
represents~ For example, 6,999 square feet would be colored green. There are
39 of those lots in Mcaille Meadows. It comprises 33~9 percent of the total
subdivision. There are zero in Westdale and therefor comprises zero of the total
percent of Westdale. Clearly, Mcaille Meadows is not compatible with Westdale
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 80
in lot size as compatibility would be indicated by the same colors occurring on
both figures 2 and 3 with approximately the same frequency~ As you can see, the
plat of Mcaille Meadows is predominately red and green. Westdale is not
predominately red and green. In fact 1 03, or 89.5 percent of the lots in Mcaille
Meadows fall within the first 3 categories, between 6}000 and 8,999 square feet.
Westdale by comparison has only 8 lots or 1 0.5 percent in the same categories.
A difference of 79 percent. The bulk of Westdale's lots, 71 percent as a matter of
fact fall in the 1 0,000 and 11 ,000 and 12,000. Westdale's average lot size is
10,965.09 square feet. 92.1 percent or 106 of the 115 lots of Mcaille Meadows
are smaller than that average. Further more the whole of Westdale is
approximately 24 acres in size. 76 lots on 24 acres makes the density of homes
per acre at 3.168. If Mcaille Meadows were to build at that same density. no
more than 91 homes would be built upon the 28.59 that they are proposing. I
urge you to take these figures into account in determining whether or not the
proposed Mcaille Meadows and R-8 zoning is the best fit for this property and the
existing developments around it. The traffic issues that we have had, some of
them have been resolved with this direct access now that we have to Cloverdale
and we would appreciate that the road to Cloverdale Road act as a public road
until the connection to the north is made. We have gathered the required number
of signatures on a petition for speed bumps as recommended by Planning and
Zoning and I have a copy here. The Homeowners Association would also like to
be included in the design of the landscape chokers as I mentioned previously. I'm
ready for questions and I thank you for your consideration.
Corrie: Do you realize speed bumps, we don't have (inaudible)?
Turney: Yes. But Planning and Zoning did have in their recommendations to you
that if we gathered 80 percent of the signatures that you request ACHD to put
them in, (inaudible).
Corrie: (inaudible)
Turney: Well, I know that but we did it anyway.
Corrie: Just so you know that. They don't always do (inaudible). OkaYt any
questions at this point?
Bird: I have none Mayor.
Corrie: Okay. (inaudible) Linda, Crossroads, is she here? Linda, I'm sorry I
won't try to attempt the last names -
Marshell: Glenda MarshelL I live 11 08 North Principle Way J Crossroads
Subdivision~ I don't have that (inaudible) statistics and facts as she does. I'm just
here basically to get my input and my feelings on this subdivision, to make it very
\.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19" 2001
Page 81
brief and blunt. We just do not want it. I came here from Portland, brought my
kids and the quality of life here was what brought us here-
***End of Side Five***
Marshell: -- everywhere you go there's subdivisions, everywhere~ I understand
that's part of growth and we accept that. But, it's become a point to where it's
taking over.. I mean you don't have parks anymore. You see a subdivision" It's
just disappointing. I would love to see these farmers that sell their property to see
something more constructive. This is such a family oriented community and we
want to see it stay that way.. I'm just here to say that, you know, granted these
developers have tried to work with us but they've also. as the first gal earlier with
the Tuscany subdivision stated half truths. A lot of it has been. We have been
mislead in a lot of ways~ The church telling us, and it's been in writing, we've had
people from day one 2 and a half years ago tell us this church wasn't going to
sell this property. It was going to be a low key field, a soccer field or a park.
That's what we've all believed from day one. Now to have this bombarded to us,
it's very disappointing~ I just hope you will consider strongly our views on this and
try to control the growth of Meridian. I appreciate it. Thank you for your time~
Corrie: Thank you. Christy Wentworth?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay, Greg Holman?
Holman: Yes. Greg Holman, 992 North Principle Way Crossroads Subdivision~ I
moved here about 2 years ago. I did some extensive research before I bought
the property. I was one of the last lots that was bought. Made up my final
decision, built a nice home, again going with the last testimony. Nothing would be
built there, which I was told by many contractors and the church. I wish I had
exact names and numbers now. 7 to 1 0 years, (inaudible) probably build
something, a low key park. Maybe a housing development for their elders,
something to do with the church, very low profile so we could still see the
mountains. It looks like we're going to be losing it. We spent extra money on the
lots. Also the fence along Principle Way belongs to the property owners now. Are
we going to get any rebates for that if this goes through? What are we going to
do about our skyline that I paid extra money for? We're losing it and that's our
concern. The roads, if you put those roads going up through Wal-Mart --. The
traffic is unbearable right now. We cannot afford to put anymore traffic into
Fairview. It's a nightmare~ We all have to drive that now~ A good example, try to
get out of Crossroads Subdivision in the morning or in the evening off
Presidential going out to Eagle, turn left You can't do it. It's impossible.
(inaudible) turn right go to a stop and go light, make a few loops around to get
going the other way.. The only way out is (inaudible) but (inaudible) does work.
That stop and go light, whoever invented that did a good job there. It works for
Meridian City Council Meeting
June] 9, 200 I
Page 82
everybody. I go to work every day. I see at least one accident to 2 accidents
every day in front of Wal-Martr people trying to wait to get out to Fairview~ They
can't get out so they cheat and they go on and get clobbered every day~ That's
alii have to say. Are there any questions?
Corrie: Okay, Greg. Any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Thank you Greg. Mary Hopkins?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: I'm sorry.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay. Fred Hodges?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay ~ Maria -
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay. Wills, last name Wills? Treasa Connelly
Connelly: Members of the City Council, my name's Treasa Connelly. I live at
4177 East Driftwood Drive. I just wanted to reiterate, there's 76 homes on
Driftwood Drive with 89 small kids that most of them are elementary age or
younger~ My main concern is to keep our subdivision safe for our kids that live
and play with their friends in this community. I like to think of our subdivision as a
community> We know our people and we like to talk to our neighbors and our
kids have a lot of friends. They ride bikes, scooters and are all over the street
With this proposed subdivision, I foresee additional cars that are not needed at
this time. I was sitting here thinking what would be a good thing? It's kind of like
putting a foot in a shoe that's too small. If Pine Street was extended, if Cloverdale
Road was adequate to handle the additional traffic. Also with Fairview Avenue. If
the surrounding area was capable of having the additional homes I wouldn't be
so opposed to this subdivision right now. But, I am because of the inadequate
structures. If this subdivision is approved I would like to request that the
developers be required to put a sign up that says no dogs, no alcohol, no loud
music at cetera to keep our neighborhood and our subdivision a nice quiet
peaceful place with a lot of kids laughing and yelling. I don't want to see stray
dogs running through~ I don't want to see garbage. I don't want to see a bunch of
construction workers coming in with alcohol and music which is what I saw when
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19,2001
Page 83
/:" "
(:" ""
\"""" ""
/~-:-"
t,::.
the school was built. You know, we had to deal with that. Several times I called
the school to tell them, you know control your people. I just would really like you
guys to really consider this area to help keep us safe and to help keep our kids
safe~ Thanks~
Corrie: Thank you. Joan VanAnberg.
VanAnberg: I'm Joan VanAnberg and I live at 1068 North Principle in the
Crossroads Subdivision. I am in total agreement with the Greg Holman with what
he said. Because many of us who live back there did pay extra because we had
a view. We were told by the church that there would be nothing built behind us
for 7 to 10 years. My other concern is traffic problems~ If you've ever tried to get
out onto, down Fairview to make a right turn on Cloverdale in the morning or in
the evening, it's virtually impossible because the traffic is backed up in both
directions~ Also the impact that it's going to have on the fire and police
department because right now, we are in dire need of more officers and firemen
and it was voted down. So, I'm just curious about what the impact would have on
that. That's about all I have to say.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you Joan. It's 11 :00 rather than break up a family clan, in
case you have to come back and she wouldn't have to-we don't want to start a
family fight so I'll have you (inaudible) the last one. If you'd like?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: She said it? Okay. Well, we've got 1, 2J3 4, 5 more. IS the Council ready
to make a decision tonight you think?
Bird: Let's (inaudible)
Corrie: Okay.
Bird: We'll be here another 2 hours.
Corrie: I was going to say the 27th we'll continue this because I don't think it
would be fair to you or to the developer to make a decision tonight based on -
not everybody's been heard. Yes, Ma'am?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: If you've got something different to say. Otherwise, it's on the record.
We've got it. We'll have it there~
(inaudible discussion)
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 84
Corrie: If you have something different, yeah. It would be the same thing. At this
point then I will ask the Council to continue this Public Hearing until the 27th of
this next week.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we continue the Public Hearing for the request for annexation
and zoning of 28.59 acres from RUT to R-8 for proposed Mcaille Meadows
subdivision by HillView land development LLC. until June 27, 2001.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion been made and second to continue the Public Hearings on the
Mcaille Meadows subdivision until June the 27th at 6:30 in the evening.
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Well, we (inaudible)~ Is there any comment? All in favor of the motion
say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: I cut myself off.
Anderson: You did, used up your time.
Corrie: All right, I used up my time~ Okay then we will have that meeting next
Wednesday night.
Bird: That also included the other 2 Public Hearings? You had put them all
together?
Corrie: All together, yes.
Item 26.
FP 01-010 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 building lots and 4
other lots on 5.17 acres in an R-4 zone for Devlin Place
Subdivision No.2 by J-U-B Engineers, Inc. - north of Cherry Lane
and south of Devlin No.1:
Corrie: Final plat approval of 16 building lots and 4 other lots on Devlin Place
Subdivision No.2 by JUB Engineers north of Cherry Lane and south of Devlin
Place No. 14 Council, you have the request for final plat (inaudible) staff
comment on the Devlin Place then we'll have the department reports.
;co.. .
i
~\.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 200 I
Page 85
/
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Shari, on Devlin placeJ comment?
Stiles: Mr~ Mayor and Council. This is on property that was previously approved
for an assisted living, Alzheimer's care facility. It was known as Prestige Care_
The developer has since rezoned the property back to an R-4 for this area here
for Devlin Place subdivision. The property adjacent to Cherry Lane still remains
zoned L-O. We will probably see an application before too long on the remainder
of that property. We would recommend approval of the Final Plat with all staff
and agency conditions.
Corrie: Okay. Council do you have any questions about plat approval?
Bird: Cherie you get to make the motion.
McCandless: I do?
Bird: Yes.
McCandless: Okay~ I move that we approve the Final Plat of 16 building lots and
4 other lots on 5.17 acres in an R-4 zone for Devlin Place subdivision No.2 by
JUS Engineers and have the Attorney draw up the appropriate papers~
Bird: I'll second it.
Corrie: Now that we have Mr. Anderson back, the motion was to approve the
request for Final Plat Devlin Place and have the attorney draw up the findings
and facts on that. Is there any further discussion?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT
Item 27.
Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies:
Corrie: Delinquency turn off schedule for 6-21. This is to inform you in writing
that if you choose to have the right to a predetermined hearing on Tuesday June
19th before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the
facts to defend the claim made by the city that your water, sewer and trash bill is
delinquent. You may retain counsel. The service will be discontinued on June 20,
2001 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to
~/.
\
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 86
contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency. Let the record show
mine's not on there.
Bird: Mine either, I don't think.
Corrie: You are hereby informed that you may appeal to have the city reviewed
by the Fourth Judicial Court pursuant to Idaho State code. Even though you do
appeal your water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list is $30,660.34.
Any discussion on the water turnoff?
Smith: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Yes sir.
Smith: The water superintendent has asked if we could also have June 27th as a
turn off date if needed.
Corrie: And June the 20th?
Bird: Yeah.
Smith: And June 20th. June 20th and 27th, if needed on the 27th~ Thank you.
Bird: Mr. Mayor, while you're on this. There's 2 things I've got to ask you. One
thing is why are our bills coming out on the 7th and you're late if you don't pay
them by the 11th? It's happened this month. I didn't mind the 2 phone calls I got
at work but I did when I got home from the wife. She's wanting to know, so IJm
asking. Also I had a couple of retired people call and ask why we can't direct pay
from their bank, if that's possible. I told them I'd get back to them and find out.
Corrie: We can if the Council so desires to do it. We'll get the information on it.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The problem with the easy pay, is
it needs to be a set amount each month.
(inaudible discussion)
Nichols: Well, that's the problem_ That's what the bank will require. That's why
you can have money taken out of your checking account for a certain amount. It's
a fixed fee every month and it doesn't fluctuate.. Unless you've got a water and
sewer bill that doesn't fluctuate that easy pay type automatic deduction doesn't
work.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: Garyt --
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19) 200 I
Page 87
,.... .
( ..
f... .
~:"'..::. .
Smith: Mr. Mayor. I think we might be talking about 2 different things. What Bill is
talking about is what's called a level pay, which establishes an amount that you
pay each month throughout the year similar to what the gas company has. The
request that Councilman Bird has received is an automatic withdrawal from a
checking account, is that correct?
Bird: Yeah~ That's what this gentleman - and he said he'd done it before.
Smith: SOl regardless of what your bill is, the amount of the bill is transmitted
from City Hall to your bank and it's automatically deducted from your checking
account.
Bird: Yeah. Idaho Power does it. That's what he was saying. When they travel, at
least the retired people were having problems.
Smith: Leslie has done some investigation into that because I think she's been
asked that question before. I'm sorry to say I don't have information in my
memory bank as to what she found out I'll certainly get that for you and present
it to you so that you can perhaps make a decision on how you want to proceed
with that.
Bird: I think if it's practical to do and other agencies are doing it~ I think it's
something that we should offer too because some of these people go out for a
month or 2 months and find out theyfre delinquent or their water's been shut off.
Smith: Right.
Bird: I think that we need to do that. Also, 4 days from the time you receive your
bill until you're delinquent is not right.
McCandless: No, it isn't~
Bird: We either get our bills out earlier -
Smith: Weill I don't understand that-
Corrie: I don't either because the cut off date's shown here is on 4-30-2001 and
this is the June 20th and 27th. (inaudible)~ I (inaudible) and it wasn't on it.
Bird: Was yours the 7th? Did you get your bill the 7th and was it delinquent the
11 th?
Smith: No. Mine wasn't.
Bird: Mine was.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 88
Smith: If there's an amount thafs not paid from the previous month, it'll show up
on a delinquent amount on the bill that you get for this month. Butt if the previous
bill has been paid there shouldn't be anything showing up as delinquent on-
Bird: No, it donJt say delinquent~ I mean it doesn't show a delinquent It says if not
paid - you get it on the 7tn if not paid by the 11th you're delinquent Now, we got
one at 1022 West State. Ours said the same thing and we had no delinquency
and 2 elderly people called me and had the same complaint~ That they received it
on the. 7th which was a Thursday if I remember right and it was delinquent as of
the 11th.
McCandless: Mine says the 16th.
Bird: These said the 11 th.
McCandless: If it's not paid by the 16th it's delinquent.
Bird: It said by the 11th on these&
McCandless: These are not even consistent.
Bird: Our billing thing has got to be-
Corrie: Gary,-...
Smith: I'll fi nd out.
Corrie: -- we better sit down and figure out what it is. Because anybody showing
on this delinquent list hasn't paidJ usually for 30 days. Maybe something's in the
verbiage that may be wrong& But, looking at this, everybody is at least 2 months
behind4
Bird: I didn't look at mine. I just took my wife's word for it
Corrie: Well, I would too, if I were you. Okay. Well, weIll find out about it then. I'll
entertain a motion then for the delinquency turn off schedule and then for June
20th and 27th if need be~
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the delinquency schedule and have the turn off
dates at June 20, 2001 and June 27,2001.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ ZOO I
Page 89
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion made and second. All in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 4.
Department Reports:
Public Works Department - Gary Smith
A.
1 ~ Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Project - Change
Order No.1:
Corrie: Gary, department reports.
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor. rm going to have Brad Watson run through these
department reports for the public works department
Corrie: Sorry} they can't do it if it says you on there.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: It's kind of late for you DAVs isn't it?
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: They know what that means.
Watson: Can you repeat it for the record. Thank you Mayor and Council. I'll try to
run through these fairly quickly. At least the first couple~ Item No~ 1 is the
wastewater treatment plant waterline project change order No~ 1. The net
increase on th is is $2, 913 ~ 71 to increase the total contract to $ 70, 607 ~ 71. If there
are any questions I would recommend that Council approve change order No.1
in that amount and authorize the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest_
Corrie: Okay. Any discussion?
Anderson: I have none.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.. I move that we approve change order NO.1 for the wastewater
treatment plant waterline project in the amount of $2913. 71 and authorize the
Mayor to sign and the city clerk to attest and I believe that was Hemminger
Construction. Is that right?
Watson: Herminger Construction.
(, ..
(^.:.~H. .
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 2001
Page 90
Bird: Herminger Construction.
Corrie: Motion been made to order No.1 change in the wastewater treatment
plant waterline project. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion
say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
2. Agreement for Roadway ConstructionlWater and Sewer
Improvements - Locust Grove Road, Fairview to Ustick:
Watson: Thank you. Item No. 2 is a cooperative agreement for roadway
construction with water and sewer improvements on Locust Grove Road,
Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road. Hopefully, you've read through that. Basically,
we're doing the same thing we did on the Franklin and Meridian Road rebuild a
couple years ago, finishing out some water and sewer in conjunction with
ACHD's road improvements. We've hired the same consultant that ACHD is
using. This agreement simply reimburses ACHD for their contract administration,
some field testing and some of those cost. What they have given me so far is a
maximum of $6,000. I've requested verification on both that amount and the total
admin cost from ACHD. I haven't received that back from them yet I think 6,000
is probably a low number if anything. If it does come back higher, we'll have to
come back and talk to you about that~ This is what I've got right now. They're
trying to get this bid out and they need to run this through their commission too.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Brad, this is just not to exceed, if you think it's going to go over 6, do you
want to move it up to an 8 or a 10, not to exceed? That way the Mayor can sign
in and then if it's 6 or under, we're great But if it's over you donJt have to waste 2
weeks coming back to see us.
Watson: Councilman Bird, Mayor and CounciL I really don't have any feel for
what it could be. I just haven't gotten very good information other than the $6,000
figure that was given to me 3 weeks ago.
Bird: But when you put out a not to exceed, you know, you're just setting a limit
there. So, if it comes in at $6,005, if we pass $6,000 the Mayor canrt allow it.
You'd have to come back. You'd to have to wait the 2 weeks to come back
before us. If we raise it to 8 or 10, even if they'll come in at 6,000, it would still be
good.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 2001
Page 91
Watson: Councilman Bird, Mayor and Council. If you're comfortable doing thatl I
have no problem.
Bird: I have no problem there. Do you Ron? Mayor, do you have any problem
with that? Cherie? With that I would make a motion that we accept the
agreement for roadway construction, sewer and water line improvements with
Ada County Highway District for construction contract administration in the
amount not to exceed $10,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign and the city clerk
to attest.
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: Motion been made and second to approve the agreement for roadway
construction of water and sewer improvements not to exceed $10,000. Further
discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
3. Biosolids Dewatering Facility - Increase to Carolla
Engineers' Professional Services Agreement:
Watson: Thank you" Item No.3 is an increase to Carolla Engineers' Professional
Services Agreement for the biosolids dewatering facility at the wastewater plant.
The memo outlines some of the causes in the increase in their budget I had,
when the project began, knocked them around pretty hard on getting this cost
down. As it turned out, some of the things that happened on a related project out
there and just the normal course of getting this thing done has caused some
increases in their required time spent The total increase they're requesting is
$7100 which would increase the contract amount for this task to $52,424~ Unless
you have questions we would recommend approving the agreement amendment
with Carolla Engineers for $45t324 to $52,424.Are there any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: I'll entertain a motion.
Bird; Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the agreement amendment with Carolla Engineers
for the biosolids dewatering facility, increasing the construction service task order
amount from $45324 to $52424 and authorize the Mayor to sign and the city
clerk to attest.
McCandless: Second.
(.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 I
Page 92
Corrie: Motion made and second to approve the Carolla Engineers Professional
Services Agreement in the stated motion. Any further discussion? All those in
favor of the motion say aye~
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
4. Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19 - Lease
Agreement:
5. Diesel Delivery and Storage Trailer Unit - Lease Agreement:
Watson: Thank you Mayor and Council. Items 4 and 5 are somewhat related. 5 is
something you've seen before~ It's the lease agreement for standby generators at
wells No. 17 and 19. At the May18th meeting we had discussed and you had
asked us to gather some more information.. One was to see if we can get a
month by month lease amount from Western States for the generators and also
to talk with Idaho Power as to the likelihood of power outages. You can see from
the memo that Western States did offer a modified lease price. Although, not
very much lower than what they had originally quoted if you calculate it out.. Gary
Smith has spoken with Arden Davis of Idaho Power. To my knowledge has not
received any written information from him as was requested.
Smith: Mayor and CounciL I talked to Arden and he was going to send some
information to me. I did not receive anything from him.
Watson: the front page of the Valley News, I noticed tonight says Lane Dobson
says they expect no power outages. I don't know anymore than that. I talked with
the water department, Rick Clinton today. I guess it's our thought that this is a
safety valve.. It's an expensive safety valve~
Corrie: They said that to me too.. There wasn't going to be blackouts~
Bird: Mr. Mayor. I think, how readily available are these generators and stuff? I
mean it's about a $10,000 insurance policy but if something happens, we'll be
happy to have that $10,000 insurance policy.
(inaudible discussion)
Watson: Councilman Bird, Mayor and Council. First of all, if we went July 1 st
through September, the total cost for the 2 generators would be $13,800. The
second part as to availability~ They are available but the ones that we want have
to be modified to plug into the receptacles that we have at the well sites. They
don't come with our specific receptacle. Everyone's a little different. The ones
that we requested quotes to include a cost for, they call it I don't know. It's a
technical term. It's a pig tail that they have to actually order and put on. It's not
(
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19) 200 I
Page 93
like if a power outage happens at 12:00 we could go get one and have it plugged
in by 4:00. It's a couple day thing from what I understand.
Corrie: They wouldn't anticipate a power outage more than about 3 hours
(inaudible) .
Bird: What would that do to us and our water?
Watson: We have 4 wells somewhat evenly distributed around the city including
the new reservoir site that has a generator. The question is not whether there'll
be water it's a pressure question, whether we can provide the pressure
(inaudible). We are updating the computer model. Until that's done this fall, I
don't know that we can run those modeling (inaudible) very accurately with the
(i naud ible ).
Anderson: Brad, that 131000 is only part of the cost because then this diesel
delivery is the other part of the cost too.
Bird: Oht yeah. (inaudible).
Corrie: (inaudible)
Watson: If we dontt use the fuel, they'll buy it back. We just have the truck rentaL
Correct. Mayor and Council one other item that I just learned this afternoon
talking to the assistant Superintendent of Nampa Meridian, they have reduced
their water flows to 60 percent, right now, today. They've cut them back to 60
percent of what they had yesterday in the ditches. The assistant Superintendent
wasf he said it was probably unlikely they would go beyond September 1st with
irrigation water. In that regard, we're going to be looking at an additional demand
on the water system in the month of September for irrigation~
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: You didn't need a decision tonight did you, Gary or Brad?
Watson: Councilman Bird. The quotes on the generators were open for 30 days
which expired yesterday. I did make contact with Western States and he's
working with us. He says they're still there. I told him I was bringing it to Council
tonight. He did ask if there would be a decision and I said that I would give him a
yes or a no one way or another tomorrow. It's not that he will give them away. It's
just that he can now. The diesel fuel thing, I don't know that there's any
immediate need to decide on that. Councilman Anderson was right. The total
cost for the program I've outlined here would be 25,250 for the 3 month period.
Corrie: Okay. If you want to make a decision now-
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19~ 2001
Page 94
(... . ......
.~..
('. .
Bird: Let's go ahead.
Anderson: I'm ready. I guess I appreciate the work you did but I have to rely a
lot on what Idaho Power is telling us. I just don't feel that there's that much
urgency. I think what I'm hearing, what I'm seeing in the news and everything
else is that people are being more power conscience now and they're scaling
back and Idaho Power is indicating that they think they're going to be okay at this
point. If we had information to contradict that then I would say yeah, we ought to
do this_ At this point I think it's $25,000 of taxpayers money that we could save
for another project
Corrie: They've been telling me they1re not going to have it
Bird: While we're talking about energy, I think the city needs to get an energy
program. I don't know if you have to have your computers on all the time~ Very
rarely is a computer turned off in this city. I don1t know why they have to be on~
They suck up a lot of power. I know we turn all of ours off. (inaudible) as much as
Tammy wanted me to bring it up. I think Mayor you need. to talk to them about
turning off the computers at night. (inaudible).
Corrie: You have to have them on. You can turn them off at the base
(inaudible). There's a possibility that (inaudible) people that come in and do the
audit for us. Then we can get a loan and maybe it wouldn't cost us anythinQ_ The
Treasure Valley Partnership that would go through the new police station and do
the wastewater treatment plant and the whole thing~ I know that, where was it,
Weiser, or one of those, They saved $35.000 just in the wastewater plant. So, I
talked to Kent Baker and we can get them and it can get be paid for by the
Treasure Valley Partnership grants and it can save us quite a bit of time too_
(inaudible) on the whole city. I've been working on a possible plan that I'm going
to show you probably this week to ask that they turn the lights off and the
computers off and save what (inaudible). Every little bit helps. You'll be getting it
probably Friday or so.
Watson: Mayor and CounciL I have instructed my departments to shut their
computers off at night. We're doing that. We're making sure that when we're
leaving the office, we're turning our lights off and trying to do a little bit to
conserve power. It's like Councilman Anderson said on this proposal tonight that
that is 25, $26,000 that can be spent on a project. The information that we have
been able to get is certainly not conclusive that there's going to be a problem.
Councilman Anderson is really close to that I'm sure because of the emergency
service that he's dealing with~ Mayor Corrie is getting that same information from
Idaho Power. I didn't get any real good conclusive evidence from Arden Davis. I
guess it's not a real - there isn't any real concrete information to support the
request. I guess maybe there's some concerns that we're picking up from
neighboring states, particularly California. With the summertime temperatures,
. .
r:.. .
\:....
(.n.
Meridian City Council Meeting
June 19, 200 1
Page 95
with the increased amount on our water system) itts like an insurance policy I
guess. You never know.
Corrie: You won't die and they're betting they do.
(inaudible discussion)
Bird: If we don't do it, it'll go. If we did it, it wouldn't go.
Corrie: Okay~ Just let it ride?
Bird: Yeah. Weil, I don't know. Cherie, what do you want?
McCandless: I don't know. I kind of agree with Ron.
(inaudible discussion)
McCandless: I had trouble saying that, you understand?
(inaudible discussion)
Corrie: Okay.
Bird: Okay~ Mr. Mayor. I'd move that we adjourn.
Corrie: OkaYJ hear a second?
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: We adjourned at 11 :30 P~M.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11 :30 PKM.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
T D. CORRIE, M~~,nt,~
. ~1~\\!olt~~IJ~~J1 .
'tAd' ~~. flllt~.h~~.r: "t,~
~ .cd .VJ ~~iJl~;"~ ~,p~.
~~.~,It., ~~ ~\r~~~
~ ,.,,-' _ t")<<& ." ~1o '~~
k. v- ~., ~ v ~
t:. .. ( ~~..
~ ~
i .". .. 1
~ - '. . BB!1L . ~ WilliAM G. BERG, JR.,
= . ~ %
-:. 1'! C~~ (;:
..,.. · .., 1"'5S ~
.. -. "~:l ~~~. ~
~ . ~.~ , ~ _..J ..0 ~
~ "1"A. ~1t5-:r 1~. , ~W ~~"$t.
~ ..... '\.. l-"-: :.... I ....;-- - ~ b~~ . 11.....
.. ;- 4t:' ~,~."",. ~n:~ ~V~
~~. , I {A.:s.. ~ ~~,I" ':\~ 'I
f,., ~'.!. :~~:~ ::~ i.:~:~:~~~~~; ~ .~ ~:'~ ~~;~\ ,
\...
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUl\1l\.1ARY
OR ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. I 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 01~919
PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 121 CHAPfER 6, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
AND TITLE 11, CHAPfER 7, CONDmONAL USES, OF TIlE MERIDIAN CITY CODE,
ALONG WITH RELATED CHANGES OF TIlE MERIDIAN CITY CODE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Section 2 of Title 11 Chapter 2 Definitions to add
the following definitions: Allowed Uses, Parks, Public and Private,.Special Use, and to delete the
following definitions: Planned Commercial Development (PO-C)., Planned General Development
(PD-G), Planned Industrial Development (PD-I), Planned Residential Development (PD-R), and
revising the following definitions: Conditional Use Permit}' Permitted Use, Planned Development
(PD), Street, Urban System D.., Yard; and amending subsection E.3" of section 3 Chapter 3 of Title
11 to add and delete language; and amending section 3 of Chapter 4 of Title 11 Use And Bulk
Regulations to delete language in 11-4-3 A and to add a new subparagraph C to 11-4-3 on
Exceptions in Planned Development; and amending section 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 11.1 Zoning
Districts to add and delete language, and amending section 1 of Chapter 8 of Title 11, Zoning
Schedule Of Use Control, Land Uses and Commercial, to add the land use of Parks, Public and
Private Planned development and delete language therein" and to add the commercial use of
Parks, Public and Private Planned Development, and delete language therein; and to add the
industrial use of Parks, Public and Private Planned Development and delete language therein;
and amending Title 12 Chapter 6 relating to Planned Development providing for headings of
Purpose, Planned Development Standards, Use Exceptions, Residential Uses, Planned
Developments In Old Town... Developer Incentives And Benefits, Application Procedure, and
Term Of Permits, and amending Title 11 Chapter 7 relating to Conditional Uses providing for
headings of General, Contents Of Conditional Use Application, General Standards Applicable To
All Conditional Uses, Supplementary Conditions And Safeguards, Procedure For Hearing And
Notice, Action By The Commission... Appeal of Commission Action, Action By The Council,
Appeal Of Council Action, Transfers & Modifications, and Revocation; providing for effect of
invalidityi providing a saving clause and providing that all ordinances and resolutions in conflict
are repealed and rescinded; and providing an effective date.
City of Meridian - Mayor an City
By: William G~ Berg, Jr., City Clerk
(
CITY OF MERIDIAN
ORDINANCE NO. tJ / -- q I q
BY: ~elwlh (j,.jr-L
Revised C/C 6/27/01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING SECTION 2
DEFINITIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE II PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL
DEFINITIONS, DELETION OF DEFINITIONS AND REVISING DEFINTIONS, AND
AMENDING SUBSECTION E.3. OF SECTION 3 OF CHAPTER 3 TITLE II TO ADD
ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE AND DELETE LANGUAGE; AND AMENDING SECTION
3 OF CHAPTER 4 OF TITLE TO DELETE LANGUAGE AND ADD A NEW
SUBPARAGRAPH C.; AND AMENDING SECTION 2 OF CHAPTER 7 OF TITLE II
TO ADD LANGUAGE AND DELETE LANGUAGE; AND AMENDING SUBSECTION
B.7. OF SECTION 5 OF CHAPTER 13 OF TITLE 11 TO ADD LANGUAGE AND
DELETE LANGUAGE; AND AMENDING SECTION I OF CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE II
OF THE ZONING SCHEDULE OF USE CONTROL TO ADD DEFINITIONS AND
DELETE DEFINITIONS; AND REPEALING CHAPTER I 7 OF TITLE II
"CONDITIONAL USES" ZONING REGULATIONS AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
"PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS TO BE REPEALED,
RESCINDED AND ANNULLED; PROVIDING VALIDITY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1: That Sectioll 2 of Chapter 2 of Title II Definitions, be, al1d the sal11e is
l1ereby amel1ded by addillg additiol1al defil1itiollS, deletiol1 of defi11itions al1d revisi11g
defillitio11S, a11d tIle saIne shall read as follows:
ACCESSORY USE OR
STRUCTURE:
A use or structllre 011 tIle saIne lot with, a11d of a
l1ature custolnarily i11cid.ental and subordillate to, tl1e prillcipal
use or strtlcture. An accessory use or strllcttlre does 110t alter
t11e essel1tial characteristics of t11e pri11cipal perlnitted use al1d
does 110t illclllde a bllilding which is defil1ed herein as a
" d welli11g Ulli tn.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
IlliPEALIN G CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 1 J AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
I
(
ADMINISTRATOR:
A designated member of the City staff who is appoil1ted by
the Mayor, and confirlned by the COUI1Cil, to administer this
Title.
AESTHETIC:
Those qualities of a development or natural feature which .
contribute to a pleasal1t el1vironlnent.
AGRICULTURE:
The use of la11d for farlning, dairying, pasturage, agriculture,
horticulttlre, floricultllre, viticulttlre, anill1al and poultry
husballdry and the l1ecessary accessory uses for paclang,
treating or stori11g t11e produce, provided, however, that:
A~ The operation of allY SUcll accessory uses shall be
secondary to that of 110rlnal agricultural activities; al1d
B~ The above uses shall not i11clude the feeding or
sheltering of al1irnals or poultry in penned enclosures
within one hundred feet (I OOJ) of allY residential
zOlling district. Agriculture does not include tIle
operation or lnaintenance of a COlnlnercial stocl<yard or
feed yard where large llulnbers of livestocl< are fed
conce11trated feeds, particularly for the purpose of
fatte11ing for Inarl(et~
ALLEY:
A public or private way with all ilnproved driving surface of
110t less than sixteen feet (16') 110r lTIOre thaI1 twel1ty feet
(20') wide and with a. platted width 110t wider tl1an l1ecessary
to accol111nodate said driving surface, drai11age, utilities,
fencil1g al1d appurtel1ant facilities, affording only secolldary
Ineans of access to abutting property at tIle baclc or side of a
property.
ALLOWED USES:
SaIne as Upermitted use".
AMENITY:
Attractive, pleasa11t or agreeable qualities associated with the
design of a developlnent or buildings a11d equipme.nt.
APARTMENT:
A rOOln or suite of raDIllS in a multiple-family structure which
is arranged, designed or used as a single housel<eepil1g unit and
has cOlnplete and perlnanently installed Idtchen and bathroom
facilities.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
2
(~
\
(
APARTMENT HOUSE:
Any building, or portion thereof, which is designed, built,
rellted, leased, let or hired out to be occupied as the home or
residence of three (3) or lTIOre families living independently of
each other and doing their own coolcillg in said building.
APPEAL:
A request for a rehearing or reconsideration or a request to a
higher authority for a change of the decision 011 tIle
application, usually because said application has been denied
or approved with the conditions by the Administrator,
COlnn1ission or COUI1Cil. This Title sets forth the procedure
which lTIUSt be followed in the filing of an appeal. A tilne
element is stated, and the applicant must ta!<e action within
this period. An appeallTIUst also be filed on appropriate fOrlTIS
which have been adopted pursuant to this Title.
APPLICANT:
Any person initiatillg an application for subdividing or
developlnent of land for the buildillg or Inodification of any
improvelnent on land. Applicant also il1cludes any person
submitting a request for rezone, conditiol1al use, accessory use,
all11exation, or request to be allowed to lna!ce a11Y application
authorized under this Title.
APPLICATION:
Proposals which are il1itiated by a perso11 to tIle COlnlnissio11
alld Council for consideration. An application shall il1clude,
but not be lilnited to, zoning amendlnel1ts, COl1ditiol1al use
perlnits, variances, preliluinary developlnel1t plans or plats,
final develoPlnent plans or plats) appeals, certificates of zoning
cOlnpliance, certificates of occupancy and al1nexatioll.
ARCHITECT:
A persoll who is qualified by reaSOl1 of his lmowledge of
mathelnatics, the arts, the physical sciel1ces al1d the principals
of architecture acquired by professional education and
experience, to engage in the practice of architecture, Idaho
Code sectiol1 54-301.
The desigl1ation given to tIle specific requiremellts
set forth in a zone or district by the ZOllil1g Ordillallce text.
Area requirements refer to the numberical stal1dards
established for a lot al1d building coverage in a particular
district.
AREA
REQUIREMENT:
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
3
(-:.
AREAWIDE WASTE
TREATMENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
(208 PLAN):
AUTOMOBLE
WRECICING YARD:
AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR:
BABYSITTIN G:
BASEMENT:
BLOCI(:
BOARDING OR LODGING
Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act Amendmellts of 1972 calls for a rational
program for cleaner water by 1983. The 208 Plan,
l<I1own as the" 1977 Ada/Canyon Areawide Waste Treatment
Managelne11t Plan" , requires the developmel1t of water quaJity
solutions by State and local levels of goverl1ment.
Prelnises on which two (2) or lTIOre currently
110111icensed motor vehicles or two (2) or lnore
Motor vel1icles 110t in operating C011ditioll are stal1ding lTIOre
than thirty (30) days and are dislnantled or stored. UMotor
vehicles" includes also Inobile hOInes, trailers or trucl<.s. Fully
enclosed buildings are exelnpt from tllis definition.
The repair, rebuilding or reconditioning of motor vehicles or
parts tllereof, incltlding collision service, paintil1g and stealll
cleaning of vellicles.
The act of caril1g for children for COl1sideratio11 while the
parents or usual guardial1s are absent~ If it is perforlned in the
child's own home or all the children are brothers and sisters of
each other, this definition sllall not be restricted as to the
number of children. If it is perforlned in the babysitter's
hOlne for childrel1 who are not all brothers and sisters, this
definitio11 of babysitti11g sllall be restricted to three (3)
children 110t any of which are related as brothers or sisters.
Babysitting is further defined as bei11g perforlned 011 a
sporadic basis and 110t on a11 every weelcday basis~ It is not to
be COllfused with daycare or the definition of a childcare
facili ty .
A POrtiOll of a buildi11g all or partly ul1dergroul1d but having at
least olle-half (1/2) of its height below the average level of t11e
adjoinillg ground.
A group of lots, tracts or parcels within well-defined
boundaries, usually streets.
A buildil1g (other thaIl a hotel, Inotel or restaurallt)
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USESn AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
4
HOUSE:
BUFFER STRIP OR ZONE:
BUILDING:
BUILDING, ACCESSORY:
BUILDING) EXISTING:
BUILDING, HEIGHT:
BUILDING,
NONCONFORMING:
BUILDING, PRINCIPAL:
BUILDING SETBACI( LINE:
where meals and/or lodging are provided for compensation to
tllree (3 ) or Inore persons who are not members of the
householder1s family.
.All area established to protect one type of land use frOlTI
possible undesirable characteristics of allother, as between
industrial a11d residential zones. The lTIOre intensive
utilization of lal1d to provide screel1ing froIll that of the less
intensive.
Any structure securely fixed to tIle la11d, and whicll is designed
or illtel1ded for the shelter, enclosure or protection of persons,
anilnals, chattels or property of a"ny land.
A Sllbordil1ate building detached froIn, but located 011 the
same lot as the principal building, the use of which is
incidental and accessory to that of the lnain building or use.
(For illustration, see 11-20-1 of this Title~)
A building erected prior to tIle effective date of this Title or
011e for which a legal building perluit has beell issued as of the
effective date of this Title's initial adoption on April 2, 1984.
The vertical distance lneasured froIn the average elevatio11 of
the proposed fillislled grade at the frollt of the buildillg to the
highest point of tIle roof for flat roofs, to the declc line of
lnallsard roofs, and the top of buildil1g walls for gable, hip and
gambrel roofs.
Any buildi11g which does not cOnfOrlTI to the
requirelnents of this Title.
A building ill whicl1 is conducted tile Inain or pril1cipal use of
the lot on which said building is situated. Every dwelling il1
any R District is a pril1cipal bltilding. (For illustration, see
Section 11-20-1 of this Title.)
AIl ill1aginary line established by this Title tl1at requires all
buildings to be set bacl( froln lot lines. (For illustration, see
Sectiol1 11-20-1 of this Title.)
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
5
/
(
BUILDING SITE:
All area proposed or provided and improved by grading,
fillillg, excavation or other means for erecting pads for
buildings.
B ULI(:
A term used to describe the size and relationships of btlildings
and other structures, spaces, streets and parlcing and overall
land area.
CARPORT:
A covered shelter for 110 lTIOre thal1 three (3) autolnobiles open
011 two (2) or lnore sides.
CEMETERY:
Lalld llsed or intended to be used for the burial of the huma11
or allilnal dead and dedicated for purposes, including
crelnatories, mausoleums al1d lTIortuaries if operated in
connection with and within the boundaries of such celuetery
for Wl1ich perpetual care and Inai11te11ance is provided4
CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY:
A certificate which is issued by the Building
Inspector to i11dicate that, after constructioll of the buildi11g
l1as been cOlnpleted, or a use in an existing building has been
changed, the purpose for which the building was constructed
or changed is capable of being carried out in accordance with
the terms of this Title 4 A structure canl10t be occupied until a
certificate of occupancy and license have been issued4
CHILD CARE FACILITY:
AllY hOlTIe, structure, or place where nonluedical
care1 protectio11, or supervision is regularly provided
to childrel1 Ul1d.er fourteell (14) years of age1 for
periods less than twenty four (24) hours per day,
wllile the parents or guardians are not on the
prelnises4 T11ere are three (3) types of childcare
facilities:
A. Faluily Childcare Home: A childcare facility which
provides care for five (5) or fewer childre11 throughout the day.
B. Group Childcare HOl11e: A childcare facility which
provides care for six (6) to twelve (12) childre11 throughout
the day.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
6
( .
CITY:
(--- ::
c. Childcare Center: A childcare facility which provides
care for lTIOre than twelve (12) children tllroughout the day.
It sllould be noted that ill determil1ing the type of childcare
facility that is being operated, tIle total nUluber of childxe11
cared for during the day and not tIle nUlnber of children at the
facility at anyone time is deterlninative.
The City of Meridian which has jurisdictiol1 over
the land under consideration ill this Title.
CLINIC (MEDICAL, DENTAL, A buildil1g (other than a hospital) used by one or
OPTICAL): more health care practitioners for the purpose of care,
diagl10sis or treatlnel1t of sicl<, ailing, infirm, or injured
patients, or those who are in need of medical and surgical
atte11tion, but which building does not provide board, rODIn or
regular 110spital care and services.
CLUB OR LODGE:
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
(INDUSTRIAL AND
COMMERCIAL):
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
(RESIDENTIAL) :
COMMERCIAL USE OR
BUSINES.S:
A building or portio11 thereof on prelnises oWl1ed or operated
by a 11011profit organized association of persons for a social,
literal)', political, ed.ucational, recreatiollal or silnilar purpose
prill1arily for the exclusive use of enrolled melnbers and their
guests, but 110t illCludillg any organization, group or
associatioll, the pril1cipal activity of which is to render a
service usually al1d ordinarily carried on as a business.
U11its which are cOl1ce11trated in one area, alld
served by COlnlnon parl<ing roads and utilities.
Ullits which are concentrated in one area and
surrounded by COlnmon open space.
The purchase, sale or other transaction il1volving the
handlil1g or dispositiol1 of allY article, substance or
COlTIlTIoditYJ or Inanagelnent of office buildings, offices for
recreational, e11tertail1mel1t or amusemel1t enterprises 7 or the
Inaintenance and use of offices by professions and trades
rel1deril1g services. The purcllase, sale or other transactions
involvi11g the ha11dlil1g or dispositiol1 of any article, substallce
or CO 111m 0 dity) or the dispel1sil1g of services for livelihood or
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
7
CONDOMINIUM:
CONTIGUOUS:
CONTRACTOR YARD:
CONVALESCENT OR
NURSING HOME, REST
HOME:
CONVENIENCE CENTERS:
CONVENIENCE STORE:
COUNCIL:
COURT:
COVENANT:
CULVERT;
A systeln of individual fee ownership of units it1 a mtuti-unit
structure whicl1 is usually cOlnbined with joint ownership of
COffilnon areas of the structure and land.
Two (2) parcels of land which, at SOIne point, have a common
border.
Any parcel of lal1d used for storage, Inai11te11allce or processing
illcidental to the busi11ess of building, hauling, excavation,
delnolitiol1 or similar activity and including any parcel of land
used- for the incidental repair of machinery used for any of t11e
above listed activities.
Any hOllie, place or institution which operates or
maintains facilities providing convalescent, or
chrol1ic care, or both, for a period in excess of twenty four
(24) C011secutive hours for two (2) or Inore patients not
related by blood or lnarriage to the operator, and said patients,
Wll0 by reason of illness or infirlnity, are unable to properly
care for themselves4
A cOlnlnercial developluent offering goods at retail and
personal services to a lilnited area in populatioll.
A store offering goods, i11cluding gasolil1e, for sale at retail.
The offering for sale of services or goods pertai11ing to t11e
repair or servicing of vellicles shal1110t be included withil1 this
defi11ition of COl1venience store4 See defi11itio11 of Service
Statio11.
The elected, legislative and governing body of the City of
Meridial1, Idaho.
A space which is open and unobstructed to tIle slcy, on a lot,
and bounded on three (3) or 1110re sides "by building walls or
fe11ces.
A written promise or plan.
A drain that channels water under a bridge, street, road or
driveway.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
9
DAIRY FARM:
A farlTI whose principal function is the production of mill< and
Inillc products al1d which lnay include the processing of lnill<
so produced~ A dairy farm further refers to a dairy barn or
processing facility or feedil1g area where animals are l(ept,
raised or fed in a restricted area.
DEDICATION:
The setting apart of land or interests i11 lalld for use by the
public by ordinance, resolution or el1try in tIle officiallninutes
as by the recording of a plat. Dedicated land becomes pltblic
lal1d UpOll the acceptance by the City.
DEGRADATION:
To scale-down the desirability or stability of an area1s physical
environlnel1t.
DENSITY:
A unit of lneasurement which specifies the l1ulnber of dwellil1g
units per acre of land.
A. Gross Del1sity: The nUluber of dwellillg units per acre of
total land to be developed, including public right-of-way.
B. Net Density: The nllmber of dwelling units per acre of land
when the acreage il1volved excludes public and private right of
way for streets and roads.
DEVELO PED AREA:
Tllat portion of development whicl1 contains all structures,
roads and site improvements. COinInoll open space shall be
deemed to be part of the developed area.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL DEVELOPMENT
PLANS):
All plats, plans and/or sublnissiol1S by a subdivider
or developer in whole or ill part describing a
developlnel1t al1d considered by the Commission
alld Council.
DISTRICT OR ZONE:
A portion of the City of Meridian withil1 which certaill
uniforln regulations and requirelnents or various combinatio11S
thereof apply under provisions of this Title. The letter flRll
sllall represent tIle reside11tial districts, with the nUll1ber
following the letter URn represellti11g the InaxilnUlTI allowable
dwelli11g U11its per acre. The letter Hen shall represent the
COlTIlnercial districts. The letter nru 811all rep res el1t the
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USESn AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
10
{"
indllstrial district. The letters uLon shall represent the lilnited
office district.
DOMESTIC LIVES TOCI(:
Cattle1 dairy animals, sheep, goats and other grazing al1ilnals
as would be fOUIld on a nOflnal farm livestocl< operation.
DOWN-ZONING:
An action by an el1tity authorized to adjust zoning regulations
which results in the lowering of the zoning classificatioll of a
giVe!l tract, tracts or area to a lesser lal1d use; for example, an
adjustlnel1t frOlTI cOlnmercial to residential land use.
DRIVE-IN ESTABLISHMENT: An establishment (other than a service statio11 or trucl< stop)
whicll is designed to aCCOlTIlTIodate the Inatar vehicles and
patrons in such lnanner as to pem1.it the occupants of such
vehicles, while relnaining therein, to Ina!ce a purchase or to
receive services.
DRY LINE SEWER:
Sewer lilles which have been installed as per City
specifications before conllections to a Mtll1icipal wastewater
treatlnent facility become a reality.
DWELLING, MULTI..FAMILY: A dwellil1g consisting of four (4) or lnore attached dwelling
llni ts .
DWELLING, SINGLE-
F AMIL Y:
A dwellil1g C011sisting of a single dwelling Ul1it only,
separated fraIn otller dwelling units by open space.
DWELLING, THREE-FAMILY A dwelling consisting of three (3) attached dwelling
(TRIPLEX): units.
DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY
(DUPLEX):
A dwelli11g designed to be used by two (2) falnilies
consisting of two (2) dwelling units which lnay be either
attached side by side or one above the other.
DWELLING UNIT:
Any building or portion thereof which meets adopted buildil1g
codes and is used as a residence or living quarters of 01le or
Inore persol1s.
EASEMENT:
A perl11anent or temporary limited right of use of lal1d for
specific purposes.
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
II
C"""
("
ENGINEER AND
PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER:
A person who is qllalified by reaS011 of his
lmowledge of lnathelnatics, the physical sciences)
and the principles of engineering acquired by professional
educatiol1 and practical experience, to ellgage i11 the practice of
professional engineering. See Idaho Code sectiol1 54-1202(a)
and (b).
ENTERTAINMENT
FACILITIES
(COMMERCIAL):
.AllY structure housing any ufor profitrl activity, which
is generally related to the entertainlnent field, such
as Inotio11 picttlre theaters, taverl1S, nightclubs, coclctail
lounges, bowling alleys, a11d siluilar entertainlnent activities.
EXCLUSIVE ZONING:
Tllis is a term applied to a district on the Zoning
Map in which only one type of land use is perlnitted~ There
may be several variations of the type of land use, but only
one category is allowed~ Illustrative of this is where an area
has been designated as a11 industrial district and the ordil1ance
text t11en sets forth tl1e permitted uses alld requirements
tllerefor~ The text of an exclusive ordinance will indicate that
only industrial developlnent will be allowed it1 this zone.
With the exceptiol1 of conditional llses, all other uses SUCll as
residential and COIDlnercial will be prohibited.
F AMIL Y:
A person living alone or two ( 2 ) or lTIOre persons livillg
together as a single housel(eepi11g U11it i11 a dwellillg unit as
distil1guislled fr0111 a group occupying a boardil1g 11olise,
lodging house, motel or hotel.
FENCE:
An ellc1osure; especially, al1 enclosing barrier, as one to
prevent strayil1g froll1 withi11 or intrusiol1 into.
FENCE, OPEN:
A fe11ce that does not restrict or ilnpede visiol1 or sight
through the fence by lnore that1 twenty percent (20%).
FLOODPLAIN:
The relatively flat area or low land. adjoil1ing the channel of a
river, stream, lal<e or other body of water which has been or
Inay be covered by water of a flood of lOO-year frequency.
TIle floodplaill includes the channel, floodway and floodway
fri11ge, as established per the e11gineering practices as specified
by the ArIllY Corps of Engineers.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USESn AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
12
FLOOR AREA, NET:
That portion of the gross floor area of the building occupied
by the listed tlSe or uses and sllall il1clude hallways, storage
and pacl(aging space, dressing or restrooms and laboratory or
worlc rooms. However, that floor space within the building
reserved for parl<ing or loading of vehicles al1d basemel1t space
used only for building Inail1tenance and utilities shall be
excluded.
GARAGE, PRIVATE:
An e11closed accessory building or an accessory portion of the
Inaill buildi11g designed and used for il1door parl<ing or storage
of vehicles or boats OWlled and operated by tIle occupal1t of
the lnain dwellillg. An unattached garage is considered to be
all accessory bllilding.
GARAGE, PUBLIC:
A building or portion thereof (except a private garage) used or
designed to be used for the storage of motor vehicles.
GLARE:
To shille with a harsh, uncolufortably bright ligllt.
GOVERNING BODY:
The Meridian City COUI1Cil.
GRADE:
The elevation of the finished surface of the ground adjacent to
the midpoint of al1Y exterior wall of a building or structure.
GRADE, ESTABLISHED:
The Cllrb lil1e grade at the lot lines as approved by the Ada
County Higllway District Engilleer or appropriate agency.
HABITAT:
The cl1aracter of the l1attlral environll1ent needed to su"pport
l1ative plant and al1irnallife.
HARDSHIP:
An unusual situation 011 the part of an individual property
OWller which will not pertnit hilTI to enjoy tIle full utilizatio11
of his property as is enjoyed by others in the community. A
hardsllip can exist only when it is not self..created.
HEALTH AUTHORITY:
Cel1tral District Health Departlnent or Idaho State Health
and Welfare Department.
HIGHWAY:
The entire width between the boundary lines of every way
publicly maintai11ed wIlen any part is open to the use of tIle
public for vehicular traffic, with jurisdictiol1 extending to the
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
13
~. ..
adjacellt property line, including sidewall<.s, shoulders, berlTIS
311d rights of way not intended for motorized traffic. The
terll1 "streetU is interchangeable with highway.
HOME OCCUPATIONS,
URBAN AND RURAL:
Any gainful operatio11, profession or craft, which is
custolnarily incidental to or carried 011 ill a dwelling place, and
wherein the use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use
of tIle structure for dwelling purposes.
HOSPITAL:
An il1stitution devoted pril11arily to the mainte11ance and
operation of facilities for the luedical or surgical care of
patients for twenty four (24) hours or Inore~ TIle terlTI
UhospitalU does not include convalescent, nursing or boarding
homes, or any institution operati11g solely for the treatment of
l11entally ill persons, drug addicts, liquor addicts or other types
of cases necessitating forcible confinelnent of patients.
HOTEL:
A building contai11ing six ( 6) or lTIOre bedroolns where
overnight lodging without individual cool<ing facilities is
offered to the public for cOlnpensation, al1d is prilnarily for tIle
accolumodation of transiel1t guests~ A Inotel shall not be
deelned to be a hoteL
IMPACT AREA:
That area duly negotiated and adopted pursuant to Idaho
Code sectiol1 67-6526 by tIle City of Meridial1 and Ada
County, State of Id.aho, by means of a separate ordil1ance.
That area shall be governed by the ordi11ances of the City of
Meridia11 pertainillg to Z011illg and developlne11t.
IMPROVEMENT:
Any alteration to the lalld or other physical constructions
associated with building site developlnents.
INDUSTRIAL:
The lnanufacture, processi11g and testing of goods a11d
Inaterials, including tIle productio11 of power9 It does 110t refer
to the growing of agricultural crops, or the raisillg of livestocl<.,
or the extraction or severance of raw lnaterials froln tIle land
being classified, btlt it does illclude activities il"lcidental
thereto~
INGRESS AND EGRESS:
E11tra11ce and exit~
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
14
(
INSTITUTION:
Buildil1g and land designed to aid individuals in need of
lnental, therapeutic, rehabilitative coul1selil1g or other
correctional services.
JUNICYARD:
An outdoor space where waste 1 discarded, or salvaged
materials are bought, sold, exchanged, baled, pacl<.ed,
disasselnbled, stored or handled. J unlcyard also incltldes house
wreclcillg alld strtlctural steel Inaterials and equiplnent, but
does not il1clude SUCll places where SUCll uses are conducted
el1tirely withi11 a cOlnpletely e11closed building such as paWl1
SllOpS alld establishll1ents for the sale, purc11ase or storage of
used furniture and household equiplne11t or for used cars il1
operable condition, or salvaged Inaterials which are incidel1tal
to manufacturing operatio11S~
I<ENNEL:
Any lot or prelnises on which three (3) or JTIDre dogs and/or
cats alld other household dOlnestic aninlals more than six (6)
montlls of age are housed, groolned, bred, boarded, trained,
sold or cared for.
LAND USE:
A terln used to indicate the utilization of any piece of land
whether it be lot, plat, tract or acreage. Land use is an
indicatiol1 of the existing developlnent withill a cOlnlnunity
and beCOlnes the basis to fOrlTIulate district boundaries.
LAND USE PLAN:
The Meridian COlnprehensive PlaIl.
LOADING AND
UNLOADING SPACE,
OFF-STREET:
An opel1 hard-surfaced area of land (other tllall a
street or public way) in which the principal use is for
the stal1ding, loading and unloading of motor vellicles, tractors
or trailers.
LOT:
A parcel of land created by subdivision whicI1 is of sufficient
size to lueet Ininilllum zoning requirements for use, coverage
al1d area and to provide such yards and other open spaces as
are herein required. A lot shall have frontage on an approved
public street or all approved private street and Inay consist of:
a) a single lot; b) a portion of a lot; and c) a combination of
cOlnplete lots, or of portions of lots.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENTn
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
15
/
t..:. .
LOT AREA: T11e area of any lot shall be deterlnined exclusive of streets,
highways, alleys, roads, rights of ways, irrigation easelnents
and land which is used for the cOllveyance of irrigation water,
drainage water, creel< or river flows.
LOT, CORNER: A lot abutting upon two (2) or more streets at their
intersection or upon two (2) parts of the saIne street, suc11
streets or parts of the same street forIlling an i11terior angle of
less than one hundred thirty five degrees (1350). The POil1t of
il1tersection of the street lines is the lfcornerU.
LOT COVERAGE: The area of a zoning lot which is Occtlpied by the principal
building, buildings or accessory btlildi11gS and the horizontally
projected area of the lot. The ratio is expressed as a
percentage.
LOT, DEPTH: The lnean horizol1tal distance between the front and the rear
lot lil1es. Where tIle lot is irregular and the lot lines converge,
the rear lot line shall be deelned to be a line at a point wllere
the side lot lines are not less tllan ten feet (I 0') apart~ (For
illustration, see Section 11-20-1 of this Title.)
LOT1 DOUBLE FRONTAGE: A lot witll frontage on two (2) streets.
LOT, FLAG LOT: A lot in the sllape of a flag on a pole or silnilar desigt1. A flag
lot shall have a l11inilTIUlTI fro11tage of thirty feet (30r) on a
public street al1d structure placed on a flag lot shall have the
house facillg the street frontage.
LOT, FRONTAGE: The distance across the lot alo11g the street right-of- way lil1e.
LOT, INTERIOR: A lot with only one frontage on a street.
L.OT LINE, FRONT: The line separating the lot from the pril1cipal street on Wllich
it frollts.
LOT LINE, REAR: The lot lil1e opposite and IllOSt distant froll1 the front lot line
or conforlning to lot depth.
LOT LINE, SIDE: Any lot line other than a fro11t or rear lot line. A side lot line
separating a lot froln a street is also called a side street or
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
16
("
flanl<.ing street lot line. A side lot line separating a lot from
another lot or lots is also called an interior side lot line.
LOT LINES :
Property lines boul1ding the lot.
LOT OF RECORD:
A lot which is part of a subdivision recorded in the office of
the County Recorder; or a lot or parcel described by metes and
bounds, the description of which has been so recorded.
LOT, THROUGH:
A lot other tha11 a COfller lot havi11g frol1tage 011 two (2)
parallel or approxilnately parallel streets. 011 a through lot)
both street lines shall be deemed front lot lines.
MAJOR SUBDIVISION:
All subdivisions not able to qualify as a mil10r subdivision.
(defil1ed below.)
MANUFACTURED
BUILDINGS:
A fabricated, transportable building (other than a
mobile hOlne) designed to be incorporated at a building site
into a structure to be used for residential, commercial,
industrial or agricultural purposes al1d which has attaclled to
the buildil1g a valid insignia Wl1ich states that the
manufactured building is built ill accordance with the Uniform
Buildillg Code2 and applicable laws, rules al1d reguIatiol1s.
Buildings to be used for residential purposes shall also include
in tIle i11sigl1ia that 8t1Cl1 buildillg is ill cOlnplial1ce with HUD
luil1ilTIltlTI property standards for such construction.
MANUFACTURING,
EXTRACTIVE:
AtlY Inil1ing, quarryillg, excavating, processil1g,
storing, separating, clealli11g or lnarl(eting of any mineral
natural resource.
MANUFACTURING,
HEA VY:
Mal1ufacturil1g, processing, asselnbling, storing,
testillg and silnilar illdustrial tlSes which are generally major
operations and extel1sive in character, require large sites, open
storage and service areas, extensive services and facilities,
ready access to regional transportation a11d. 110rlnally generate
some nuisances such as slno!(e, noise, vibratioll, dust, glare) air
polltltioll or water pollution.
2 See Title 10, Chapter I of this Code.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
17
(
MANUFACTURING,
LI GHT:
lndtlstrial uses whicll are usually controlled
operatio11S, relatIvely clean, quiet a11d free of objectionable or
l1azardous eleluents SUCll as smolce, noise, odor or dust; which
operates al1d stores within e11closed structures, and which
generate little industrial traffic and no nuisances.
MARQUEE:
A perlnallent roofed structure attached to and supported by
the building and projecting over public property.
MEAT PACIGNG
( COMMERCIAL):
A facility which includes the ca11ning, curil1g,
slnol<ing, saltil1g, pacl<ing and freezil1g of Ineat products, or a
facility in which meat products are processed for sale to the
retail trade alld where the i11spectiol1 of lneat, meat by-
products and Ineat food products are Inaintained.
MINOR SUBDIVISION:
A11Y subdivisiol1 containing not lTIOre than four ( 4) lots
fronting 011 an existillg or proposed street, or the extension of
Municipal facilities, or the creation of any public
improvelnents, and not adversely affecting the remainder of
the parcel ot adjoi11ing property alld 110t ill conflict with any
provision or portiol1 of the COlnprehensive Plal1, Zoning Map,
Zonil1g Ordillance or other ordi11al1ces.
MOBILE HOME:
A structure tral1sportable in one or lTIOre sectiol1S which has
attached to tIle structure a valid i11signia Wllich states that the
lnobile hOlne is in compliance with Federal lnobile hOlne
construction al1d safety standards (HUD).
MOBILE HOME PARI(:
A residential area which i11volves land under single ownership
with lots rented for the location of Inobile hOlnes and
provision of facilities and services to tenants by managelnent.
MOBILE HOME
SUBDIVISION:
A subdivision designed and i11tended for exclusive
lnobile home residential use.
MONUMENT:
Any permanent marl<er (either concrete, galva11ized iron pipe
or iron or steel rods) used to identify any tract, parcel) lot or
street lilles, as specified in Idallo Code section 50-1303.
MOTEL:
A building, or group of buildings on tIle saIne prelnises
(whether detached or in connected rows), COl1taining sleeping
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
18
MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR,
MAJOR:
MOTOR VERI CLE REPAIR,
MINOR:
c.-- ...
or dwelling U11its i11dependently accessible froIn the outside, or
central hallway, with garage space or parl<.ing space located on
the prelnises, and designed for, or occupied by, travelers. TIle
terln includes, but is not limited to, any buildi11gS or building
groups desigl1ated as auto courts, Inatar lodges, tourist courts
or by any other title or SigIl il1tel1ded to idel1tify them as
providing lodging to motorists.
E11gi11e rebllilding or lnajor reconditionillg of worn
or damaged motor vehicles, or trailers, collision seIVice,
i11cluding bodY1 fraIne or fe11der straighteni11g or repair, and
overall painting of vehicles within an ellclosed building.
I11cidental repairs J replacement of parts a11d motor
service to Illatar vellicles, but not il1cluding any operatio11
under UMotor Vehicle Repair, Major'l.
MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER Meridial1 City facilities for the central collectiol1 alld
COLLECTION AND treatmel1t of dOll1estic wastewater, within the
TREATMENT SYSTEM: Meridian Urban Service Plal1ning Area, and provides for the
relTIoval of polluting constituel1ts froIn wastewater i11cluding
reduction of biological oxygen delnand, suspended solids, fecal
coliforlTI and provides for disinfection of any discharged water.
NEIGHBORHOOD
CONVENIENCE
CENTER (COMMERCIAL):
NONCONFORMING USE:
NURSERY OR
GREENHOUSE FOR
FLOWERS AND PLANTS
(COMMERCIAL):
A Sl10ppillg center 11aving approxilnately thirty thousa11d to
two hU11dred thousand (30,000 to 200,000) square feet of
gross floor space and on a site of approximately four to eight
(4 to 8) acres of land. It would provide for the sale of
conveniellce goods (food, drugs al1d sundries) al1d persol1al
l1eighborhood services for the day-to-day living of the
immediate l1eighborhood within whicll it is located.
TIle use of land or a use of a structure or building which is 110t
in c011forlnance with the conditions or requirelnents of this
Title.
Lal1d, buildi11g structure or combination thereof for
the storage, cultivation a11d transplanti11g of live
trees, shrubs or plallts offered for sale on the
prelnises inc1l1ding products used for gardenil1g or lalldscaping.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
19
(., .
OPEN SPACE:
OPEN SPACE (COMMON):
OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC):
ORIGINAL PARCEL
OF LAND:
OWNER:
OWNERSHIP:
P ARICING AREA OR LOT
(PRIVATE):
PARI<ING AREA OR LOT
(PUBLIC) :
AI1 area substantially open to the sl<y which may be on the
sal11e lot witll a building. The area may include (along with
the natural environlnental features) water areas, swimlning
pools, tennis courts al1d any other recreatiollal facilities.
Streets, parl<ing areas, structures for habitatiol1, buildings,
covered structures and the lil<e shall not be il1cluded.
AllY private open space intended for use by occupa11ts of a
developmel1t. The space may include, but is not limited to,
recreatioll areas, lal1dscaped plazas, fOul1tains, sitting areas,
natural areas al1d is mea11t to provide an opel1 atluosphere.
COffilnon private open space does not include parldng areas,
vacal1t or undeveloped lots, or any other space which does not
contribute to the aesthetic quality of the developlnent~
Land in public oW11ership or control which includes, but is not
lilnited to, parl<s, recreation areas, water bodies, historical
sites, public utility easelnents, scenic routes, floodplains, slide
areas, areas too steep for safe construction, wildlife refuges,
natural areas, forests, fisheries al1d watersheds.
A lot or tract as recorded 011 allY plat of record 011 file in the
office of the C011nty Recorder or any U11platted C011tiguOllS
parcel of lal1d held in OIle ownership a11d of record at the
effective date of this Title, April 2, 1984.
The perso11 or entity l1avi11g the oW11ership of record il1 t11e
property.
The il1dividual, firm, associatioll, syndicate, part11ership or
corporation who has title of property.
AIl opell, hard-surfaced area (other thaI1 a street or
public way) designed, arranged and made available for private
passel1ger autolnobiles of occupants of the building or
btlildings for which the parldl1g area is developed4
All ope11) hard-surfaced area (otIler than a street or
public way) to be used for the storage (for lilnited periods of
time) of operable passenger autolTIobiles or cOlnnlercial
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ttPLANNED DEVELOPMENT')
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
20
(
c,.
vellicles and available to the public whether for compensation,
free or as an aCCOlTIlllodation to cliel1ts or customers.
PARIGNG SPACE,
OFF-STREET:
For the purpose of this Title, an off-street parl<ing space shall
consist of an area adequate for parldng an automobile with
dilnensiol1s conforluing to the requirements of this Title.
PARI(S, PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE:
A11Y area that is predominately open space, used
pri11cipally for active or passive recreation, and not
used for a profitMll1alcing purpose.
PARTY WALL:
A wall adjoining and parallel to the lot line whicl1 is used
prilnarily by the party upon whose lot the wall is located.
Party walls may share common fOUlldations.
PERFORMANCE OR
DESIGN STANDARDS:
Stal1dards which are of tell applied to industrial,
residential and cOlnmercial districts alld place lilnits on such
things as noise, dust, glare, Sl1101<e, vibration, radioactivity and
odors; al1Y proposed use which cannot Ineet these standards is
110t to be allowed., and once a use has been permitted, it lnust
lnaintain its ability to Ineet the standards or else have its
certificate of occupancy revol<ed.
PERFORMANCE OR
SURETY BOND:
A fina11cial guarantee by a subdivider or developer
deposited alld filed with tIle City in the alnount of the
estil11ated COl1strtlctiol1 cost guaral1teeing the cOlnpletion of
physical ilnprovements according to pla11s al1d specificatiollS
witllill the tilne prescribed by the agreelne11t by the developer.
The bond il1volves an alllount of mOIley or other negotiable
security which is paid by the subdivider or developer to the
City Clerl( and Recorder. The bOlld also guara11tees tl1at the
subdivider or developer will perform all actions required by
the governing body regarding an approved plat or pla11, and
provides that if the subdivider or developer defaults and fails
to cOlnply with the provisions of an approved plat or pla11, the
subdivider, developer or his surety will pay dalnages up to the
lilnit of the bond, or the surety will itself complete tIle
requirelnents of the approved plat or plal1.
PERMITTED USE:
The utilizatio11 of land which shall be perlnitted to ta!<e place
i11 a zoning district as a use by right, subject OIlly to the
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
21
PU~NED CO!\1!\1ERCIAL
DE\'ELOP!\1ENT (PD C):
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(PD):
PL^ul\JNED CENE~\L
DEVELOPI\1E~JT (PD C):
PLi\l'Jl'IED IND US TRIAL
DE\TELOP1\1E~JT (PO I):
PL^~l'IED RESIDENTU\L
DEVELOPi\1Ei'JT (PD R):
sta11dards established for the particular district and to any
applicable overlay district an}~ district as set forth by tl~is Title.
./\11)'" dC"'vvcloplncnt ir~ \Ylhich the prillcipal use of land
is for cOllllncrcial purposcs4
A type of COl1ditional use in which a parcel of land is
plal1ned and developed as a unit or single entity,
tlllder single owners11ip or COl1trol, contail1ing one
or 1110re uses, buildings, COllllTIOn Opel) space a11d!
or recreatiol1 facilities. .l^h:. area of lal~d "~y"yhich is dc\~clopcd as a
sirlglc cl"'a.tity'" for a ntllnbcr of uses it".. cOlnbination \\ith or
cxclusi\'v~c of other supporti\TC uses. A^}.. PD rna)Y be c11tircl)T
rcsidcl"'a.tial, industrial, COlnlTICrcial or n Inixturc of cOlnpatiblc
uscs~ .LA,"- PD does l~Ot necessarily'" corrcspol"a.d to lot size, bull<,
density, lot co~"rcragc required, OpCl~ space or type of
residcl~tial, cOllllncrcial or industrial uses as established in an)'"
Ol"'a.C or lnorc created districts of this Titlc4
J.^~ dCY\l~eloplncl"..t not othen;visc distinguished under
planl~cd cOlnlncrcial, industrial, residential dcvcloplTICnts, or
ill Yl{hicl~ the proposed use of il"a.tcrior ar~d exterior spaces
requires unusual dcsigr:. flexibility'" to achieve a cOluplctcl)V
logical ar:.d cOlnplcll.....cl-:.tal)~ cOl~jur:.ctiol~ of uses ar~d fur~ctiol~S.
This PD classificatiol~ applies to esscl~tial public services,
ptlblic or pri"v"ate recreatior.. facilities, institutior~al uses,
cOll~lnUl~it)~ facilities or a PD ~l'~/hich il1cludes a Inix of
residerltia17 COl111ncrcial or industrial uses.
j\.t~}~ dc',/cloplnc11ts il..... T;"rhich. the pril"..ci pal use of tl~c
lal~d area is for ir~dustrial purposes or accessory uses
custolllaril)'" rclatil~g to industrial uses "'~"'vith the balal1cc of such
areas, if ar'I.)Y, bcil1:g intcr~dcd for COlTIlnCrcial uses as rcasol.....ably
relates to the support or COl~'\,~Cl-...icncc of tl"..c intcl~dcd
i11dustrial uses or tl--:.cir occupal~ts.
1\1"..J" dc~\rcloplncnt vyThicll is prcdol1-:inar~ltl)~ residential
il1cludirlg those acccssol)Y purposes custolnarily relating to
rcsidcl.....tial uses \\~th tl~c balar..cc of Sltcl"'a. area, if aI~.}"') bcir'..g
il1tendcd for such llSCS as reasol~ablJY relate to the support or
COl~~v~cr:.icrlcc of tl~c residential uses of other occupar:.ts.
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USESn AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
22
(
roo . .
\....
POUL TRY
SLAUGHTERHOUSE
AND/OR POULTRY
P ACI<ING PLANT
(COMMERCIAL):
All establishments lnailltained for the slaughtering
of poultry or preparil1g or processing of poultry
products for human consulnption ill any farlTI and
whereil1 said products are so prepared for sale to the
retail outlets.
PROFESSIONAL OFFICES:
Structures where tllose engaged it1 a profession COl1duct their
business and activity.
PUBLIC NOTICES:
The 110tice given by the City of Meridian or the applica"nt,
which is required, whicll provides notice to the public and area
residents ,around the area being COl1sidered that an applicatiol1
113s bee11 filed a.nd that the City will be holding a hearing at a
tilne certai11 and date certai11 and whereby the public and
property owners will have all opportunity to submit their
views and ideas and evidence as to the proposed developlnent
or Z011il1g.
PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITY: Bllildings, power plants or substations, water storage tanIes or
reservoirs, public garages or storage areas, water treatlnellt
plants or PUll1ping stations 1 sewage disposal or pUlnping
plants, a11d other silnilar public service structures owned
and/or operated by a public utility, railroad (whether publicly
or privately owned), or a MU11icipal or other governlnental
agency.
PUBLIC USES:
Public parIes, schools, adlnil1istrative and cultural buildillgS,
and strllctures, bllt 110t including public lalld or buildi11gS
devoted solely to tIle storage and Inainte11al1ce of equiplnent
and Inaterials al1d public service facilities~ Also public-owned
buildings, fire and police stations) libraries, post offices and
public utility adlninistration buildings.
PUBLIC UTILITY:
Any person, el1tity or Municipal departlnent tllat is duly
authorized to furnish to the public ullder regulation such as,
but 110t limited to, electricity, gas, steall1, telepholle,
tra11sportation or water4
QUASI-PUBLIC USE:
Churches, SUllday schools, parochial schools, hospitals,
c011valescel1t or retirelnel1t hOlnes, colleges and other facilities
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENTn
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
23
of al1 edllcational, religious, cllaritable, philanthropic or
nOl1profit l1ature.
REGIONAL SHOPPING
CENTER (COMMERCIAL):
The largest of s110pping centers which is all-inclusive
and self-sufficiellt with at least two (2) large departlnent stores
as the major tenants and gel1erally serves a population of
approximately Olle hundred fifty thous"and (150,000) or more.
It is a ce11ter having over seven hundred fifty thousand
(750,000) square feet of gross floor space and located on a site
greater than seventy five (75) acres.
REP AIR:
The reconstruction, renewal or lnaintenance of real or personal
property.
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES:
Research, developlnent and testing related to such fields as
chelnical, pharmaceutical) medical, electrical, transportatio11,
planning and engineeril1g.
RESERVE STRIP:
A strip of la11d between a partial street and adjacellt
property which is reserved or held in public ownership for
future street extension or widening.
RESTAURANT:
Any land, building or part thereof (other than a
boarding house) where Ineals are provided. for cOlnpe11sation.
RIGHTw-OF-W AY:
A strip of lalld dedicated or reserved for use as a public way
Wllich 110rlnally includes streets, sidewallcs and otller public
utilities or service areas. III addition to the roadway, .it
incorporates the curbs, special features required by tIle
topography or treatlnent such as grade separation, landscaped
areas, viaducts and bridges.
ROADSIDE STAND:
A teluporary or mobile structure designed or used for the
display or sale of products or services.
SANITARIUM:
A health station or retreat or a11Y place where resident patients
are l(ept and which specializes i11 giving clinical, temporary
and elnergel1cy services of a Inedical or surgical nature to
patie11ts and injllred persons al1d general medical practice as
distinguished frolu treatlnent of lnental and nervous disorders
(110t excludi11g surgical and post-surgical treatll1ent of luental
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
24
patients) and as licel1sed by the Idallo State Departlnent of
Health as sanitariulTIS.
SCHOOL (IGNDERGARTEN, AI1 institution of learning (eitller public or privately
ELEMENTARY, sllpported) which offers instruction ill the several
INTERMEDIATE OR HIGH): branches of learning and study required to be taught in the
public schools by the State of Idallo. High school includes
jll11ior al1d sel1ior high.
SCREENIl'JG:
See definitioll of Buffer Strip or Zone.
SEAT:
T11e place at, or the thing on, which 011e sits. For purposes of
deterlnining the nUlnber of off-street parldng spaces for certain
uses, the nUlnber of seats is the l1Ulnber of seating Ul1its
installed or il1dicated or eacll eighteen (18) lineal inches of
benches, pews, or space for loose chairs.
SERVICE STATION:
Bllildings and prelnises where gasolil1e, oil, grease, batteries,
tires and lllotor vehicle accessories may be supplied and
dispellsed at retail alld where Ininor motor repair and services
Inay be rendered. Uses perlnissible at a service station do 110t
include Inajar bod.y worl(, straightelling of body parts,
paillting, weldil1g, storage of autolTIobiles 110t ill operatillg
COlldition, or other worle involving noise, glare) ftlmes or
slTIolce.
SETBACI( LINE:
A li11e established by this Title, generally parallel witll a11d
111easured froIn the lot line, definil1g tile limits of a yard il1
whicll110 building may be located above grotlnd except as lnay
be provided ill this Title. (See Section 11-20-1 of this Title.)
SIDEW ALl(:
That portion of the road right of way outside the roadway
which is ilnproved for the LIse of pedestrian traffic.
SIGN:
Any strllcture or natural object, such as a tree, rocl(, bush, the
groulld itself or part thereof, or device attached thereto or
paillted or represented thereOl1, Wllich shall be used to attract
attentioll to allY object, product, place, activity, persoll,
i11stitution, orgal1izatioll or business or which shall display or
il1clude any letter) word, model, banner, flag, pennal1t, insignia
device or represel1tation used as, or which is i11 the l1ature of
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
25
al1 a11110uncelnent, direction or advertisement. For the
purpose of this definition, the vvord UsignH does not include the
flag, pennant or insignia of any nation, state, city or other
political unit or al1Y political, educational, charitable,
philanthropic, civic, professional, religious or lil(e campaign,
drive7 lnovelnent or event.
SIGN, OFF-PREMISES:
A11Y Sigl1 llnrelated to a busilless or professiol1 COl1ducted or to
a cOllllnodity or service sold or offered UpOll the prell1ises
where stIch SigI1 is located.
SIGN, ON-PREMISES:
Any Sigt1 related to a business or profession conducted or to a
C01TIlTIodity or service sold or offered. Up011 the prelnises where
such sign is located.
SITE PLANNING:
The location of buildings and activities within a physical
environment~ A site pIall includes shapes and location of
buildi11gS al1d strllcttlres, circulation and parlcing layouts,
landscaping features and nUlnerous other desig11 factors that
relate to tIle ilnprovement of a parcel of lal1d.
SLAUGHTERHOUSE AND
MEAT PACIGNG
(COMMERCIAL):
A facility which includes a slaughtering, Ineat ca11ning,
curil1g, slTIoldl1g, salting, pac1<ing, rendering or freezillg of
lneat products or a facility in which Ineat products are so
processed for sale to tIle public a"nd wllere the il1spectiol1 of
111eat, l11eat by-prod.ucts a11d meat food products are
l11ail1tai11ed.
SPECIAL USE:
SaIne as "conditional use".
STABLE, PRIVATE:
A detached accessory structure for tIle l<eeping of 011e or 1110re
horses, mules or cows owned and used by OCCtlpal1t of the
preluises and not for relTIuneration, hire or sale.
STABLE, RIDING:
A structtlre used or designed for the boarding or care of riding
11orses.
STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS:
The specifications as specified in this Title and as
officially adopted by the City.
STATE:
The State of Idaho.
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USESn AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT HPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
26
(
/"
\~
STOCICYARD OR FEED-
LOT (COMMERCIAL):
AI1 enclosure where fowls or al1ilnals are l<.ept in a
restricted area and where less than ten percent (1 0%) of the
feed for such poultry or livestocl<. is produced by the owner on
his imlnediate, owned farm or leased property.
STORY:
That portion of a building included between the upper surface
of any floor and the upper surface of the floor l1ext above,
except that tIle toplnost story shall be tllat portiol1 of a
building included betweel1 the upper surface of the toplnost
floor and the ceiling or roof above. If the finished floor level
(directly above a baselnent, cellar or unused under-floor space)
is more thaI) six feet (6r) above grade (as defil1ed herein) for
more than fifty percent (50%) of the total perimeter or is
Inore than twelve feet (121) above grade as defined herein at
any point, such baselnent, cellar or unused under-floor space
shall be C011sidered as a story.
STREET:
A right of way whicIl provides vehicular and pedestrian access
to adjacent properties~ The term "street" also illcludes the
terlTIS highway, thoroughfare, parl<way, road, route, avenue,
boulevard, lane, place, and other such terlns~
STREET1 HALF:
A portion of the width of a street, usually along the edge of a
subdivisiol1 or developrne11t, where the relnail1ing portion of
tIle street could be provided il1 another subdivision or
developlnen t.
STREET LINE:
A line separatil1g all abutting lot, or parcel, frolll a street.
STREET, PROPOSED:
The undedicated portiol1 of a street aligl11nel1t, or proposed
wide11i11g of an existing street as proposed on the Ada County
Major Thoroughfares Plan, or any State or Federal highway,
the aligl1111ent of which is officially approved.
STREET, RURAL SYSTEM:
A~ Pril1cipal Arterial: A conl1ected rural networ!c of
contil1UOUS routes which serves corridor movelnents having
trip length a"nd travel density characteristics il1dicative of
substantial statewide or interstate travel.
B. Millor Arterial: In cOl1junction vvith the pri11cipal
arterial systeln, the lninor arterial road system forms a rural
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
27
l1e two rlc. Major cIlaracteristics of the system are to linlc cities,
larger towns and provide inter-county service. These routes
are designed to provide for relatively high overall travel speeds,
with IninilTIUlTI interferel1ce to through lTIOVement.
c. Major Collector Road: That which provides service to
any county seat not on an arterial route al1d linl<s these places
with l1earby larger towns or cities or with routes of higher
classificatiol1. Major collectors serve the lTIOre important
i11tra-county travel corridors.
D. Minor Collector Road: That which collects traffic fraIn
local roads and brings developed areas withill a reasonable
distance of a collector road9 Millor collector roads provide
senrice to tIle remainillg slnaller COllllTIUnities.
E. Local Road: That which provides access to adjacent
land and provides service to travel over relatively s110rt
distances.
The functional street classification definitiol1S are,sullllnarized
descriptions of the fUl1ctional street guideli11es that are tlsed
by the Federal Highway Adlninistration.
STREET, URBAN SYSTEM: A. Pril1cipal Arterial: Should carry the major portion of
trips ellteril1g al1d leavi11g the urban area as well as the
lnajority of the through-trips desiril1g to bypass the ce11tral
city. III addition, significant inter-area travel (SUCll as betweel1
central busilless districts and outlying residel1tial areas,
between Inajar inl1er city COlTIlnunities, or between major
suburban cellters) should be served by this class of facilities.
B~ Minor Arterial: That which intercOllnects witll, alld
auglne11ts, the urban principal arterial system al1d whicl1
provides service to trips of moderate lel1gth at a sOlnewhat
lower level of travel Inability than Inajar arterials. Minor
arterials place Inore emphasis on la11d access thal1 the higher,
principal arterial system.
c. Collector Street: That Wl1ich provides botll land
access, service and traffic circulation within residential
ZONING REGULATIONS ('CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENTu
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
28
neighborhoods, CO lTIlnerci al and industrial areas. Collectors
also collect traffic froIn local streets in residential
neighborhoods and channel it illtO the arterial system.
D. Local Street: That which comprises all facilities not. on
the other of the higher systelTIs. Local streets serve primarily
to provide direct access to abutting lalld and access to the
11igher order system. Exalnples of local streets are ualleysn
(Wllich provide secondary access at the baclc or side of a
property otherwise abuttil1g a street); "loopstreets" (a Inillor
street with both terminal points on the same street or origin);
"cul-de-sac" (a street conl1ected to another street at OIle end
0111y and provided with a turnaround space at its termil1lls);
"partial street" (a dedicated right of way providing only a
portion of the required street width, usually along the edge of
a subdivisiol1 or tract of land); and "private street~ (a parcel of
land providing vehicular a11d pedestrian access to adjacent
properties froIn a publicly dedicated right of way and which is
recorded i11 the Ada County Recorderrs office as a perpetllal
easelnent to the property owners talcing access tllerefroln or
the ownership of which is vested in the property owners tal<ing
access therefroln). All private street access lnust be approved
by the Council. At10ther local street which is lltilized often by
a city is U frontage road" . It is a local, auxiliary road to, alld
located 011 the side of, an arterial high",ray for service to
a.btltting property al1d adjacel1t areas al1d for control access to
the property adjoil1il1g the l1ighway, and to Inail1taill
circulatiol1 of traffic on each side of the 11igl1way.
STRIP, COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL:
A developlnent pattern cllaracterized by lots ill a
C011ti11UOUS Ina11ner frontil1g on streets and resulting in
nUlnerous access pOi11tS to the street.
STRIP ZONING:
Zoning usually found alo11g a lnajor roadway which is
developed simply as a pattern followil1g the outlille of the road
and without foundation ill the cOlnprehensive study or in fact.
STRUCTURAL
ALTERATION:
Any cllange in the structurallnelnbers of a buildillg such as
walls, columlls, beams or girders.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
29
(..
t
c.. :....
.. .
STRUCTURE:
Anythi11g constructed or erected in which the use requires
perlnallent location on the ground or attachment to sOlnething
havil1g a perlnanent location on the ground. AInong other
things, structures include buildings, Inobile homes, walls and
billboards. Fences sheill be deemed a structure. Public utility
power poles shall not be deemed a structure.
SUBDIVIDER OR
DEVELOPER:
The person who executes an applicatio11 or i11itiates
proceedings for the subdivision of land in accordal1ce witll the
provisiol1S of tllis Title. He need. 110t be the owner of tIle
property; 11owever, he sllall be a11 agent of the 0W11er or have
sufficient proprietary rights in tIle property to represel1t the
owner and his acts and representations shall be binding upon
the owner.
SUBDIVISION:
The result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel
of land il1tO two (2) or more parts~ The terln usubdivisio11t1
shall also include the dedication of a public street and the
addition to, or creation of, a celnetery~ However, this Title
shall not apply to any of the followi11g:
A. An allocation of land ill tIle settlement of an estate of a
decedent or a court decree for the distriblltion of p'roperty;
B. TIle unwilli11g sale of la11d as a res lIlt of ulegal
condelnl1atiol1" as defilled al1d. allowed i11 tIle Id.allo Code;
C. The widenil1g of existil1g streets to cOllform to the
Meridian COlnpre11ensive Plal1;
D. The acquisition of street rights of way by a public
agency in conforlnance with the Meridian COlnprehel1sive
Plan; and
E. The exchange of land for tile purpose of straightening
property boundaries which does not result in tIle chal1ge of the
present land usage.
SUPPLY YARDS:
A COlTIlllercial establishlnent storing and offerillg for sale
buildil1g supplies, steel Stlpplies1 coal, l1eavy equiplnel1t, feed
and grail1 al1d silnilar goods.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)'
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
30
)~.. ~ .
(~
l
SURVEYOR:
TOWNHOUSE OR
ROW HOUSE:
TRAILER, RECREATIONAL
VEHICLE AND
MOTOR HOME:
TRANSITIONAL USE:
TRIP GENERATION:
TRUCI( STOP:
A persoll qualified by reason of his IGlowledge of the principles
of surveyi11g acquired by education a11d experience, and who is
authorized by the laws of the State of Idaho to practice land
surveying. See Idaho Code sectiol1 54-1202(f).
A row of two (2) or lTIOre attached sil1gle-falnily
dwellillgS. Each dwelling is built with silnilar architectural
treatlne11t, is separated by vertical divisions by party or lot li11e
walls1 a"nd each has private entrances (usually front and rear).
Any vehicle or structure constructed in Stich a
manner as to perInit occupancy thereof as living
quarters or the condllct of allY business1 trade, occupation, or
use as a selling or advertisillg device or use for storage or
c011veyal1ce for tools, equiplnent or 111achinery and so designed
that it is or lnay be Inounted on wheels and used as a
conveya11ce 011 higllways a11d streets and propelled or drawn
by its own or other Inotar power.
A use of lal1d desig11ed to selVe as a buffer betweell conflictil1g
land llses such as single~falnily residential uses al1d comlnercial
or il1dustrial uses or between residential uses al1d heavily
traveled traffic arterials~ Uses designated as transitiol1al uses
ill eacl1 particular district are deelned to be those Wllich are
lTIOre or less cOlnpatible to the COl1flictil1g uses.
N1 elemel1t of a traffic vollllne survey which indicates the
l1umber of autonlobile, btlS, pedestrian or bicycle trips
produced or generated it1 a specific area or by a specific llse.
As al1 exalnple1 an office building generates uxu l1ulnber of trips
to worl< by its elnployees al1d UXH number of trips hOlne frOITI
worl(.
A service station or COlTIll1ercial enterprise USillg the prelnises
prilnarily to sell and supply lnotor fuel, lubricating oils al1d.
greases to on-prelnises trade includi11g large trucl<s as well as
autolllobiles and including the sale of tires) batteries,
autolnotive accessories, related services, major and lninor
motor vehicle repairs as well as special services to operators
and drivers of trucl(s operatil1g 011 an illterstate basis.
ZONING" REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
31
UNDEVELOPED AREA:
That portion of a developlnent which is left llnimproved or a
parcel of land which is unimproved.
URBAN SERVICES:
Accordil1g to this Title, urbal1 services shall include, but not be
lilnited to, the following where applicable: MUl1icipal central
sewer al1d water facilities; pedestrian wall<ways and bicycle
paths; open space; parIes; recreation lal1ds; police and fire
protectioll; public transit; schools; libraries; starIn drainage;
and urba11 standard streets and roads.
URBAN SPRAWL:
Scattered developluent which is 110t contiguous to the
urbanized part of a lnunicipality. Sprawl is characterized by
significant amounts of vacant land interlnixed with parcels of
urban developlnent and with forlnless dispersal of a cOllgested
urba11 area with little or 110 regard for the interrelationships of
such factors as tral1sportatiol1, elnploymel1t, l1ealth and
recreational needs.
USE:
The specific purposes for which land or a building is
desigl1ated, arrallged, intel1ded or for which it is or Inay be
occupied, maintained, let or leased.
VARIANCE:
A variallce is a lTIodificatiol1 of the reqllirell1el1ts of this Title
as to lot size, lot coverage, widt11, dept11, fro11t yard, side yard,
rear yard, setbacl<s, parl<il1g space, lleight of bllildil1gS or otller
provisions of this Title. A variance shal1110t be COl1sidered a
right or special privilege, but Inay be grallted to an applicant
only UpOll a showil1g of undue hardsllip because of the
characteristics of the site and that the varial1ce is not in
C011flict witll the public interest.
VEHICLE:
Every device in, UpOl1 or by which any person or property is or
Inay be transported or draWll upon a public l1ighway or street
excepting devices moved exclusively by l1ulnan power or tlsed
exclusively upon statiol1ary rails or tracts.
VESTED RIGHTS:
Vested rig11ts1 if properly used, refer to rights whicl1 have been
accrtled to an i11dividual as a result of a condition which llas
existed for a period of tilne. A vested right is one in which the
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 0 F TITLE 12
32
individual cannot be denied rigllts that lnay have existed to
him.
VETERINARY, ANIMAL
HOSPITAL OR CLINIC:
A place used for the care, grooming, diagnosis and
treatl1lellt of sicl<, ailing, infirm or injured animals and those
who are in need of medical or surgical attention and may
include overnight accolnlnodations on the premises for the
treatment, observation or recuperatiol1~ It Inay also include
boardil1g that is incidental to the primary activity.
VI CINITY MAP:
A drawillg which sets forth by dimensions or otller means the
relationship of the proposed developlnent to other nearby
developments1 landlnarl<s or COllllTIUnity facilities and services
within the general area in order to better locate and orient the
area in question.
WALI(WAY:
A public way for pedestrian use only, whether or not along the
side of tile road.
WET LINE SEWER:
Sewer lilles which are c011nected to a MUl1icipal wastewater
treatlnent facility as per City specifications.
YARD:
A required open space, other tha11 a court, unoccupied alld
unobstructed by a structure or portion of a structure from
tllree feet (3f) above the gel1eral groltnd level of t11e graded lot
upward; provided, tllat accessories, Of11alnellts and fUIlliture
l11ay be perlnitted in al1Y yard and subject to height litnitations
al1d requirelnents limiting obstructioll of visibility. (For
illustration, see Section 11-20-1 of this Title.)
A~ Front Yard: A yard extending betweel1 side lot lines
across tIle front of a lot and EroIn the fro11t lot line to the front
of tile prillcipal buildillg.
B. Rear Yard: A yard extending betwee11 side lot lines
across the rear of a lot and froIn the rear lot line to the rear of
the pril1cipal building.
C. Interior Side Yard: A yard extel1dil1g froIll tIle principal
btlilding to the side lot line on both sides of the principal
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
33
/-:-"...-~ .
\".. .
(
buildil1g between tIle lines establishillg the front and rear
yards.
D. Street Side Yard: A yard extending frDIn the principal
buildil1g to the secondary street that adjoins the lot between
the lines establishing the frollt and rear yards.
E. COtlrt Yard: See defil1ition of Court.
F. Tra11sitional Yard: A yard whicll serves as a buffer
betweell conflicti11g land llses such as between single-falnily
residelltial uses alld cOlnlnercial or industrial uses or between
residential uses al1d 11eavily traveled traffic arterials.
Tral1sitional yards are deelned to be al1 open space whicll is
betweel1 tllose uses which are more or less cOlnpatible.
ZERO LOT LINE:
A building design which allows for a dwelling to be built to the
side lot line and which may include an easelnent to a
lleighboring lot for the purpose of uplceep and lllaintenance of
each dwelling. Zero lot li11e developlnents can be either
dwelling units detached or attached.
ZONING MAP:
The grapllic depictioll of the zones or districts within the City
linlits of Meridian. The Map includ.es:
A. AIl indication of the boundaries of each of tIle districts;
B. A legel1d identifying each of the districts;
C. Ide11tification nalnes of streets, strealTIS and other
places;
D. Dilnel1sions indicating the boundaries between districts.
TIle Zoning Map is to be adopted as a legal part of an
Ordinance al1d designated as the Official ZOllillg Map of the
City.
ZONING PERMIT:
A dOCUlnent issued by the Adlninistrator authorizi11g the uses
of land and structures, and the characteristics of the uses.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
34
ZONING POLICY:
The policy as adopted by the governil1g body of the City of
Meridian and which is the underlying, fundalnental basis for
this Title; that is, the ZOlling and Development Ordinance of
the City of Meridial1. (Drd. 430,4-2-1984; alnd. Drd. 456, 9-
3-1985; Ord. 496,9-6-1988; Ord. 557, 10-1-1991; Ord~ 5.92,
11-17-1992; 1999 Code)
SECTION 2. That Sectiol1 3 Subsection E. 3. of Cllapter 3 of Title 111 Plal1nillg and
Zonillg COll1111ission, be, and the saIne is l1ereby arnel1ded by addil1g additiol1allangtlage al1d
deletillg lallguage, alld the saIne shall read as follows:
11 ~3-3ME.3.
Review all applications for subdivisions~ B:fl€l plal1ned develoPlnents (PD, C011tract zonil"'a.g
applicatiol~S, zoning applications, a11nexation applicatiol.....s and COl1ditional use1, and
mal<e recoffilnel1datiollS to the Council~ (Ord. 430, 4-2-1984)
SECTION 3. That Section 3 of Chapter 4 of Title 11, Use And Bllll( Regtllations, be, and
the saIne is hereby alne11ded by addil1g additio11allanguage and add-ing a new subsection C, and
the saIne shall read as follows:
11-4-3
A. Use: A btlilding, structure or land shall hereafter be used or occupied, and a
buildillg or part thereof, or otller structure, sllall be erected, raised, lTIoved,
reC011structed, extended, ell1arged or altered only as in conforluity with tIle
regulations 11erein specified. for tIle district in whicl1 it is located. Exccptior~s to
the use al1d buIlt rcgulatior....s of tl--:.is Title shall be onl}r by '\'rariar~ce~
B. Bull(: All new buildings and structures shall cOl1forl11 to the regulations
established herein for the district ill which each building shall be located except as
otherwise perIni tted in this Ti tie by variance. (Ord. 592, II M 1 7 -199 2 )
c~ Exceptions in Planned Developlnellt: Planned Developlue11ts Inay be approved
with different uses alld bulle standards than those specified for the zonil1g district,
ill cOlnpliallce with the Plal111ed Developlnent sections of this Title.
SECTION 4. That Sectiol1 2 of Chapter 7 of Title II J Zoni11g Districts, be, a11d the saIne
is hereby alnended by adding additio11al lallguage alld deletillg language, and the saIne sllall
read as follows:
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
35
A. R-2 Rural Low Density Residelltial District: The purpose of the R-2 District is to
perluit the establisl11nel1t of rural low dellsity single-family dwellings, alld to
delineate those areas where predoluinalltly rural residential development has, or is
lilcely to occur in accord with the COlnprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect
the integrity of rural residential areas by prohibiting tIle intrusion of incompatible
nonresidel1tial uses. The R-2 District allows for a InaxilTIUlTI of two (2) dwelling
Ul1its per acre and requires cOl1nection to the Municipal water and sewer systems
of the City.
B. R-3 Rural Mediulll Density Residential District: The pllrpose of the R-3 District is
to perlnit the establislllnell.t of rurallUediulTI del1sity sil1g1e-falnily dwellings, a11d
to delilleate those areas where predolninantly lnediuln de11sity rural residential
developlnent has, or is lilcely to occur il1 accord with the COlnprehensive Plan of
the CitY1 and to protect the integrity of medium density rural residel1tial areas by
prohibitil1g tIle intrusion of i11compatible nonresidential uses. TIle R-3 District
allows for a luaximUlTI of three (3) dwelling units per acre and requires cOl111ectio11
to the Municipal water and sewer systelTIS of the City.
c. R-4 Low Dellsity Reside11tial District: 0111y single..falnily dwellings, public schools,
and ptlblic and private parl<s shall be perlnitted and no conditional uses shall be
perlnitted except for planl1ed rcsidcr~tial development~ and public schools. The
purpose of the R-4 District is to permit the establishment of low density sillgle-
falnily dwellings, al1d to delilleate those areas wllere predolninantly residential
developlnent has, or is lil<ely to occur ill accord with the Comprehel1sive Plal1 of
tIle City, al1d to protect tIle il1tegrity of residel1tial areas by prohibiting the
i11trtlSio11 of il1COlnpatible nOllresidel1tial uses. The R-4 District allows for a
111axil11Ul11 of fOllf (4) dwellillg units per acre and reqllires conllection to the
Mmunicipal water and sewer systelTIS of the City of Meridja11.
D. R-8 Mediul11 Density Residel1tial District: The purpose of the R-8 District is to
perluit the establishlnent of sil1gle- alld tvvo-falnily dwellings at a density not
exceeding eig11t (8) dwelling Ullits per acre. This District deli11eates those areas
where such developlnent has or is lil<ely to occur ill accord with tIle
Comprehensive Pla11 of the City and is also designed to perluit the conversion of
large hOlnes into two-falnily dwellil1gs in well-established l1eighborhoods of
cOlnparable lalld use~ Connection to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the
City is required.
E. R-15 MediulTI High Dellsity Residelltial District: The purpose of the R-15 District
is to perlnit tIle establishl11ent of meditlln-lligh density sil1gle-family attached al1d
Inulti...falnily dwellings at a density 110t exceeding fiftee11 (15) dwelli11g units per
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENTu
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
36
(-
acre~ All such districts lnust have direct access to a transportation arterial or
collector, abut or have direct access to a parl< or open space corridor 1 alld be
cOl111ected to the MUl1icipal water al1d sewer systellls of the City~ The
predominant housing types in this District will be patio homes, zero lot line
single-family dwellings, t0W11houses, apartmel1t buildings and condominiums. .
F. R-40 High Density Residential District: The purpose of the R-40 District is to
permit the establishmelTt of l1igh density residential uses at a del1sity 110t
exceedillg forty (40) dwellillg tl11its per acre~ COl111ection to the Municipal water
al1d sewer systell1S of tile City is required.
G. L-O Lilnited Office District: The purpose of the L-Q District is to permit the
establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, adlninistrative,
accountillg, clerical, stellographic, public service and silnilar uses. Research uses
s11all not involve heavy testing operations of any l<ind or product manufacttlril1g of
such a nature to create 11oise, vibration or emissions of a nattlre offellsive to the
overall purpose of this District. The L-Q District is desigt1ed to act as a buffer
between other Inore il1tense nonresidelltial uses and high dellsity residential tlSes,
and. is tllUS a transitionalllse. Connectioll to tIle Municipal water and sewer
system of the City is a requirement in tllis District.
H. C-N Neighborhood Business District: The purpose of the C-N District is to permit
the establisll1nent of sl11all scale convel1ience busi11ess llses whicll are il1tel1ded to
l11eet the daily needs of the residents of an ilumediate neigllborllood (as defined
by tile policies of the Meridial1 Comprehel1sive Pla11); to el1collrage clustering alld
strategic sitil1g of stIch bltsillesses to provide service to tl1e neigllborhood a11d
avoid illtrusio11 of slIch uses i11tO the adjoi11illg residential districts. AIl such.
districts shall give direct access to tral1sportatiol1 arterial or collectors, be
cOl111ected to the Municipal water and sewer systelTIS of the City, and shall not
constitute all or any part of a strip development concept.
I. C-C Community Business District: The purpose of the C-C District is to pertuit
the establishmellt of general busilless llses that are of a larger scale tha11 a
neighborhood business, alld to el1CQUrage t11e development of Inodern shopping
centers with adequate off-street parl<ing facilities, and associated site alnenities to
serve area residellts al1d elnployees; to prohibit strip commercial developluel1t a11d
e11collrage the clustering of COllllnercial el1terprises. AIl SUCll districts shall have
direct access to a transportatio11 arterial and collector and be conl1ected to the
Municipal water and sewer systelns of the City.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
37
C.."
(... ...
J~ RSC Regional Shoppi11g Cel1.ter Busil1ess District: The purpose of the RSC
District is to provide for and permit the establishment of general and retail
business uses that are intended to, and will serve1 the entire region of the Treasure
Valley; to permit btlSiness uses that would be of a larger scale than in tIle
COffilnunity Busilless District; to perluit the developlnel1t of a regional shopping
cel1ter or Inall with adequate off~street parl<ing facilities and associated site
alnenities to serve Ctlstoll1ers al1d elnployees; to prohibit strip cOll11nercial
developmel1t and encourage the clustering of regio11al cOlnlnercial enterprises~ All
such districts shall be located in close proximity to Inajar highway or principal
arterial streets. All sllcll districts sllall be connected to the Mtlnicipal water and
sewer systelTIS of the City~
IC. C-G General Retail And Service COl111nercial District: The purpose of the C-G
District is to provide for COlll1nercial uses which are custolnarily operated entirely
or almost entirely within a building; to provide for a review of the ilnpact of
proposed COlTIlnercial tlSes which are auto al1d service oriented a11d are located in
close proxilnity to Inajor highway or arterial streets; to flllfill the l1eed of travel-
related services as well as retail sales for the transient and. perlnanel1t lTIotoring
pllblic. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal water alld sewer
systell1S of the City, and shall not C011stitute strip comnlercial developlnent and
encourage clustering of commercial developlnent.
L. OT Old Town District: The purpose of the OT District is to aCCOlTIlTIodate al1d
ellCQUrage further expal1sion of the historical core of the CO Inlnu11 ity; to delilleate
a centralized activity center alld to encourage its rel1evval, revitalizatio11 and
growth as tIle public, qLtasi-public, cultllral, fil1ancial and recreatiol1al cel1ter of the
City~ A variety of tl1ese uses illtegrated witll gel1eral busi11ess1 l11ediul11..11ig11 to
high de.nsity residential, alld other related uses is e11couraged. il1 an effort to
provide tIle appropriate Inix of activities necessary to establish a truly urban City
center~ The District shall be served by the Municipal water al1d sewer systelTIS of
tIle City. Developlnent in this District lTIUst give attention to the llandling of high
volulnes of traffic, adequate parldllg, and pedestrian Inovelnent, and to provide
strip cOlnlnercial developlnent, and lnust be approved as a COl1ditiol1al use, unless
othelWise perlnitted.
M. TE Technical District: TIle purpose of the TE District is to perlnit al1d encourage
the developlnent of a tech11ological parl<, il1Cludillg research al1d developlnel1t
centers, vocational alld tecllnical scllools al1d compatible manufacturi11g, and
wholesale business establishluellts whicI1 are clean, quiet and free of hazardous
materials al1d that are operated e11tirely or almost entirely within el1closed
structures; to delineate all area of adequate size to accomlnodate present and
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT HPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 0 F TITLE 12
38
future compatible needs on lands w11ich are relatively free of ilnprovelnents, well
suited for such use because of location, topography, access and utility service
potential, and relatiol1ship to other land uses could render the District infeasible
for its illtended use. The District must have direct access on two (2) or Inore
transportation arterials or collectors, designed to convey large volumes of traffic
through nonresidential areas to Inajar highways and thoroughfares. It lTIUst also be
ill such proxilnity to ensure connection to the Municipal water alld sewer systelTIS
of the City for domestic requiremel1ts. The District is furt11er desigl1ed to act as a
bllffer betweel1 il1dustrial al1d higllway uses alld other less intellsive busilless a11d
residel1tial uses, and to provide all el1vironlnelltally pleasing, safe and aesthetically
pleasing employtnent cellter for tIle cOffilnllnity and tIle regioll.
N. I-L Light Industrial District: The purpose of the I-L Light Industrial District is to
provide for light industrial development and opportunities for elnployment of
Meridian citizellS and area residents and redtlCe the need to COffilnute to
l1eighbori11g cities; to el1CQUrage the developluent of lnallufacturillg al1d wholesale
establishlnents which are cleal1, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable
elelnellts, such as 11oise, odor, dust, slTIol<e or glare and tllat are operated entirely
or allnost entirely withi11 enclosed strtlctures; to delineate areas best suited for
il1dustrial developll1e11t because of locatioll, topography, existing facilities and
relationship to other land uses~ This District l11USt also be in such proxilnity to
ellsure connection to the Municipal water and sewer systelTIS of the City. Uses
illCOlnpatible with light i11dustry are not permitted, and strip developlnel1t is
pro11ibi ted.
o. M Mil1eral Extracti11g .Al1d Processillg District: TIle ptlrpose of tIle M District is to
delil1eate those areas witlll<11own lnilleral resources a11d to set aside StIch land for
the extractioll, processillg and storage of Ini11eral resources. This District is
designed to assure that t11e i11trusiol1 on nOl1cOll1patible lal1d ltSeS does 110t
preclude the extraction and processillg of said lninerals, and to assure that the
extraction of these resources is so Inanaged al1d the land reclailned in such a
Ina1111er that no hazard or l1uisance be created which either illllnediately or in tIle
futltre lnay adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the COffil11unity.
Milleral extractiol1, processillg and storage lnay be conducted only ill this District,
and a land reclalnation pla111uust be prepared and approved prior to any
extraction. Developlnel1t ill this District l11USt connect to City water and sewer~
P. FP Floodplaill Overlay District: The ptlrpose of the FP District is to guide
developluel1t in the flood prone areas of al1Y watercourse tllat is COllsistellt with
the requirell1e11ts for tIle cOl1veyance of flood flows, al1d to Inil1ilnize the expense
a11d inC011veniel1ces to the individual property 0W11ers arLd the gelleral public
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
39
(...
through flooding. Uses perll1itted in tl1is District are generally associated with
open space, recreatio11al a11d agricultural land uses and shall not 11inder the
lTIOVernent of the flood waters~ (The FP District is superimposed over the other
districts 9 )
Q~ MUR Mixed Use Review Areas: Those areas which, beCatlSe of their unique
location and varied pote11tial need to be pla11ned as a wholeJ have been designated
ill the Meridian COlnpre11ellsive Plan as lnixed use review areas. T11ese areas shall
be developed a~ plal1ned developlnent~ general (PD C), and must be approved as
a C011ditiol1al use.
R. FTZ Foreign Trade Zone: The purpose of the Foreign Trade Zone is to permit the
establishment of all area that is, or will be, in the Foreigl1 Trade Zone as granted
by tIle Foreign Trade Zones Board to the City. Land. in this District may include
areas, because of their unique location or near11ess to the Foreigt1 Trade Zone alld
potential to be i11tegrated into the Foreig11 Trade Zone, need to be lilnited in tile
uses to which they Inay be put. Uses in tllis Zone Intlst be approved tInder the
desigIl review process.
s. S-FTZ Sub-Foreign Trade Zone: The purpose of tIle Sub~Foreign Trade Zone is to
perluit the establishlnel1t of an area or areas that are not in the Foreign Trade
Zone as gra11ted by the Foreign Trade Zones Board. to the City but are areas, the
uses of which have, or Inay have, an adverse ilnpact on the Foreign Trade Zone or
the uses contained therei119 Lalld ill this District lnay include areas located
adjace11t or 11ear the Foreigll Trade Zone and tIle uses l1eed to be lilllited so as not
to calIse, or potelltially calIse, adverse ilnpact 011 the Foreigl1 Trade ZOlle or t11e
uses contail1ed. thereil1. Uses ill this Zone lntlst be approved Ul1d.er the conditional
use process. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)
SECTION 5. That Section 5. Subsection B. 7. of Chapter 13 of Title 11, Scl1edule of
Parlcillg Space Requirelnel1ts, Mixed Uses, be, a11d the same is l1ereby anlended by adding
additiol1alla11guage a11d deleting language, al1d the saIne shall read as follows:
11-13-5.B.7.
Mixed Uses:
WIle!1 2 or 1110re uses are located on the same
zonir:.g lot or within tl1e saIne buildil1g, parl<.i11g
spaces equal ill nUlnber to the SUlTIS of t11e
separate reqtlirelnents for each such use shall be
provided;-ft . No parlci11g space or portion thereof
shall serve as a required space for more thall I
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
40
(
(.:.:... ."
use unless othetwise authorized by varial1ce or as
part of a Plal1ned Developlne11 t approval as
appro\'(ed b~y' the COffilnission.
SECTION 6. That Section 1 of Chapter 8 of Title II, Zonillg Schedttle Of Use Control,
Lalld Uses, of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" J be, and the salne is hereby amended by
adding additiol1allanguage and deletillg language, and the same s11all read as follows:
11-8-1: ZONING SCHEDULE OF USE CONTROL: LAND USES
LAND USES DISTRICTS
A. RESIDENTIAL R-4 R~8 R-15 R-40 L-O C-N C-C RSC C..G OT TE M
Apartment houses C C C C
Boarding or lodging houses C C C C
Cllildcare centers C C C C C C C C C
Faluily childcare hOllle P.A P-A C C C C C C P-A
Group childcare honle C C C C C C C C
Home occupations P..A P..A C C l>-A
Libraries C C C P
Mobile haOle parks and.
S llbdivisi ons C C C
"M ul ti - f arl1 i Iy dwe II i ngs P P C C
Paries, Public and Private P P P P
Planned HH#: developlnent C C C C
Ccneral planned. residential C C C C C C C C
Planned residential develop
111cnt (PO) C C C C C
Single-faoliJy d,velling P P P P P
Three-faJnily d\velling C P P C
Tvvo-falnily d\vclling du plex P P P
B~ COMMERCIAL I~-4 R-8 R-IS R-40 L..G C~N C-C RSC C-G OT ~rE M
Accounting services C P P P C P C
Adn1illistrative services C P P P C P C
Adult ~
En tertainnlen t
Businesses
Automobile repair shop C C
Autonlobile service statiol1S C C C p C
Automobile \vashing facilities C P C P P P
Bakery stores C P P C P C
Banl<.s and other financial
estab I ish m en ts P C P C P C
Bars, alcoholic establishn1ents C C C C C C
Broadcasting, radio and TV C P C C C C C
Bus and l~ail stations C P C
Cemeteries C C
Cllildcare cen ter C C C C C C C C C
Churches C C p p C p
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND 41
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
Clinics (medicat dental
and optical)
Clubs and lodges
Construction buildings,
temporary
COllvenience stores
Departlnent stores
Drive-in theaters, drive-i n
estab lis h men ts
Dry cleaning
Entertainnlent centerSt indoor
Entertainment centers, outdoor
Faluily childcare h0l11e
Garages, public
Greenhouses, nurseries
Group childcare home
Home occupations
Hospitals
Hotels
Laboratories (n1edical, dental
and optical)
Laundries, c0l11111ercial
Lau ndro ma ts, sel f -service
Libraries and 111useurns
Mortllaries
Motels
Nursing hOllles and sanitariunls
Nurseries and day care centers
Parks" Public and Private
Planned Development
Plan.n.ed COI1-1ITlCrcial dcyclopn:cnt
Planned unit dcvclopR~cnt
C c I~cr.fll
Professiollal al1d sales offices
Public parking lots
Public and quasi-public uses
Public service facilit,ies
Publishing and printing facilities
(snlall)
Radio alld TV
Regional shopping center
Resta tl ran ts
Retaj 1 stores
Retiremellt homes
Research facilities
Sales lots (auto, recreational,
agricul turat etc.)
School - Private, nursery
School.. Public P
Shopping centers. coulmunity
Shopping centers, neighborhood
Shopping centers, regional
Storage facilities, indoors
Storage facilities, outdoors
Service stations
(
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
C
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
c
p
p
C
C
C
p
C
C
C
I)
C
I)
PDR
I)
C
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
.P
C
p C
C
C C
P C
p C
C C
p C
I) C
C C
C C
p C
C C
p C
C
p
p
p
C C
P P
C C
p p
C C
p C
C P
C C
PDR PDR
P C
C C
C
p C
C p
C
p
c
c
p
c
p
p
p
c
p
p
p
p
p
p
c
p
C
C
c
p
C
C
IJDR
p
C
p
C
c
c
c
p
p
p
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
P-A
C
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
C
C
c
p
C
P
c
p
C
PDR
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
C
P.A
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
C
P-A
C
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
c
p
c
p
c
c
c
c
c
c c c
c c
c c
c c C
PDR PDR PDIZ
C
C
C P C
c
p
c
p
c
p
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
c
c
c
p
p
c
p
C
C
c
c
PDR
c
p
c
c
p
p
c
c
c
p
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
c
c
p
p
C
p
C
p
c
p
p
PDR
DR
p
C
p
C
p
C
p
p
p
c
p
c
c
p
C
p
p
p
42
Truck stops
Technical school - (with curricula
related to the principal uses)
Veterinary clinics and hospitals
Wholesale facilities
(Ord. 55?, 10-1-1991; amd. Ord. 592f 11-17-1992)
p
c
p
c
p
p
p
c
C. INDUSTRIAL
R-4
R-8
R-15 R-40 .L-O
C-N
c-c
RSC
C-G
OT
Apparel n1anufacturing
Asphalt and concrete
Autoll1obile \vrecking yard and. storage
Bakery products
Bottling and packaging
Bulk storage (flaJnnlable liquids
or gases)
Cabinets, doors, toys and other
secondary wood products
Carpet and dry cleaning
Contractors yard
Electrical supplies and appliances
Electronic equipment and products
Equiplncnt - heaVYJ farm, etc.
(sales and repair)
Fabricated. metal products (except
foundry operations)
.Feed, seed and fertilizer store
Film laboratories
Fuel yards
[nd llS trial researcll
InstrtlOlents
Junk yard
Leather products (except tann ing)
Lunlber yards
Machine shop
Mobile home Inanufactu ring
Motor vehicle repair
Molded. plastic products
Office machines
Photographic equipment
Parks, Public and Private
Planned Development
Planncd unit dcvcloptllcnt Ceneral
Planned unit dcvclopnlcnt Industrial
Printing and publishing
Processing plants
Public utility yards
Railroad yards and shops
Recycling plants
Small machinery and C01l1pOnent parts
Soli d \vaste trans fer sta ti 0 ns
Warehousing and ,;yholesaling
c
p
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
P = Pern1itted Use C = COllditional Use
(Ord.557f 10-1-1991)
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
P-A = Permitted as Accessory Use
DR = Design Review
p
C
C
p
c
p
p
p
p
TE
M
p
p
p
c
p
p
c
p
])
.P
P
P
p
c
p
p
p
C
p
p
C
C
p
P
l>
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
:p
p
C
p
p
p
P
C
p
p
p
p
43
D~ Livestocl< And Poultry Prohibited; Exceptiol1: Witllin allY of the zoning districts of the City, it
shall be unlawful to use the land for the lceeping or housing of pOllltry or livestocl<. AIl poultry or
livestocl< presel1tly l<ept or maintained prior to the passage of the Ordinance codified in this
subsection shall be allowed to COl1tinue until the property that they are l(ept on or maintained on
ceases to be used for such purposes for a period in excess of one year and after that one year,
poultry or livestoclc may not agaill be able to be l(ept or lnaintained on that property; provided,
that said property was being legally used to lceep or lnaintain poultry or livestoclc prior to adoption
of the Ordinal1ce codified in this Title; and1 provided7 however, that property preselltly or
sllbsequently zoned for the use of lneat or poultry processing shall be allowed. to lceep or Inaintain
poultry or livestocl(~ (Ord. 524, 4-3-1990)
SECTION 7: That Chapter 17 of Title II uCOl1ditional Uses" Zoning Regulatiol1S of the
Meridia11 City Code1 be, al1d the saIne is hereby repealed.
SECTION 8: That a l1ew Chapter 17 of Title II "COllditional Uses" Z011ing Regulations
of the Meridian City Code, be7 al1d the saIne is hereby enacted to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17
CONDITIONAL USES
SECTION:
11-17-1:
11-17-2:
11-1 7 -3 :
11-1 7 -4 :
11-17-5:
11-17-6:
11..17-7:
11...17 -8:
11-17-9:
11-17-10:
11-17-11:
General
Contents Of Conditional Use Application
General Standards Applicable To All Conditional Uses
Supplementary Conditions And Safeguards
Procedure For Hearing And Notice
Action By The Commission
Appeal Of Commission Action
Action By The Council
Appeal Of Council Action
Transfers & Modifications
Revocation
11-1 7 -1 : GENERAL: Conditiol1al uses by definitiol1 have characteristics which
require that the proposed use be reviewed a11d. evaluated by the COlTIlnissiol1 al1d Council as to
whether or not the use will be detrilue11tal to other persol1s7 property or uses it1 the vicinity~
The COlnlnissiol1 shall hold a public 11earing on eacll COllditional use applicatiol1, al1d shall
reCOlTIl11end approval, denial or Inodificatiol1 of the application to the Council.
Recoffilnendatiol1S for approval or lnodification shall include conditions deelned l1ecessary to
i11sure cOlnpatibility of tIle developlnel1t with other uses in the vicinity and such additional
safeguards as are necessary to uphold the illtent of this Ordinance.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
44
(~.. .
i~
(,. .. . .
11-17-2: CONTENTS OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION: AIl applicatio11
for a COl1ditional use perInit shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator by tIle owner or
representative of the OWller of the property for which such conditiol1al use is proposed, using a
fOIln provided by the Administrator~ A fee as established by the Council sllall be paid at the~.
tilne of fili11g, as required by Sectiol1 11-19-3 of this Ordinance~ At a Inil1ilTIUlTI, the applicatiol1
shall contain the following inforlnatiol1:
A. NatTIe, address, phone alld. fax l1ulnbers, al1d e-Inail address (if available) of the applicant;
B. NatTIe, address alld phone nUlnber of the OWller of subject property;
c. Legal description of the property;
D. Proof of ownership of subject property (vvarral1ty deed);
E. Notarized consent frolll titled owner of property. (If owner is a corporation1 Articles of
Incorporation or other evidel1ce showing the person signing is an authorized
representative) ;
F. One (I) copy of a vici11ity map (1 u=300');
G. A plal1 (vvitil a scale of 110t less thaIl I" =50~) of tIle site for the conditiol1al use. Twenty-
five (25) copies sllall be provided witll the applicatiol1. Tl1e site plan sllall include the
followi11g:
1. Bllildillg location(s)
2. Parl<.illg al1d loading areas
3~ Traffic access drives
4. Traffic circulation patterllS
5. OlJen/cOlTIlnOn areas
6. Refuse & service areas
7 ~ Utilities plan (sewer, water, irrigation and stornl drail1age)
8. Sigtl1ocation(s) and overall dilnensions (sign elevations recomlnended)
9. Residential lot configuratiol1 (applicable to Planned Developlnents with residelltial
tlni ts )
H~ La11dscape Plan per City Ordi11ance Title 12, Chapter 13
I~ Buildil1g Elevations of nortll, sotlth, east a11d west views on 8 1/2" X 11" sheets
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
45
J. Construction Inaterials;
!(. One (1) 8 Y2" X II n reductiol1 of the site plall;
L. List of property owners within 300';
M. A narrative describing the characteristics of the property that lualce a COllditional use
desirable and a detailed descriptioll of tIle proposed uses a11d any existillg uses.
N. A fee established by the Council;
o. A signed affidavit that the property will be posted with a hearing sign OIle (I) weelc prior
to the scheduled public hearings; al1d
P. The COlltents of the application shall be verified by the applicant or representative. A
statelnent shall be sublnitted stati11g that he/she has read the contents thereof alld.
verifies that the inforrnatiol1 contail1ed i11 the application is true and correct.
11..17..3: GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL CONDITIONAL USES:
The COlnmission and COU11Cil shall review tile particlllar facts and CirCU1TIstances of each
proposed conditional use in ternlS of the followi11g, and may approve a COllditiollal use permit if
they shall find evidence presellted at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish:
A~ That tile site is large el10ugh to aCCOlTIlTIodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces,
parldl1g, landscapillg al1d other features as Inay be required by this Ordil1al1ce;
B. That tIle proposed use al1d developlnel1t plan will be 11arlnonious with the Meridiall
COlnprellel1sive Plan and in accorda11ce with t.he requireme11ts of tllis Ordinallce;
c. That the desigl1, construction, operation and Inai11tenance will be compatible with other
uses il1 tIle general neigllborllood al1d witll tIle existing or intel1ded c11aracter of tIle general
vicinity and that StIch use will not adversely c11ange the essel1tial c11aracter of the saIne area;
D. Tllat the proposed use, if it COl11plies witll all co.nditions of the approval il11posed:r will .not
adversely affect otl1er property in the vicinity;
E. That t11e proposed use will be served adequately by essel1tial public facilities and services
such as l1ighways, streets, schools, parIes.!. police and fire protectio11, drai11age structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer; or that the persoll respOllsible for the establis111nellt of tIle
proposed conditio11al use shall be able to provide adequately any SUCll services;
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
46
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional cost for public facilities and
services and will not be detrilnental to the econolnic welfare of the cOlnmunity;
G. Tllat the proposed use will not il1volve activities or processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operatiol1 that will be detrilne11tal to any persons, property or the general ^
welfare by reason of excessive prodllctiol1 of traffic, noise, slTIol(e, fumes, glare or odors;
H~ Tllat the proposed use will have vehiclllar approaches to the property Wllich shall be so
designated as 110t to create interferellce with traffic on surroullding public streets; and
I~ That tl1e proposed use will 110t result ill the destrllction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic
or l1istoric feature considered to be of major ilnportance.
11-1 7 ..4
SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS:
A. In approving al1Y conditional use, the COlnmission and COUI1Cil shall prescribe appropriate
conditio11S, bonds and safeguards ill COllforlnity witll this Ordinance~ Violatio11S of such
COllditions, bonds or safeguards, which are a part of the terlTIS under which the conditional
use is granted, shall be deemed a violatiol1 of the Ordinallce and lnay constitute grounds to
revol(e the COl1ditional use.
B. A C011ditio11al use pertuit, whel1 gral1ted, shall be valid for a maxilTIUll1 period of eigllteen
(18) lnonths u111ess otherwise approved by tile COtlllCil. Dllring this tilne~ the perluit
holder 11111St COlTIlnenCe tIle use as perlnitted in accordallce with the conditions of approval,
satisfy the reqllirel11e11ts set fortll ill the conditions of approval, and acqtlire btlildil1g perlnits
a11d COll1lnence C011structiol1 of perll1al1ellt footil1gS or structllres on or i.11 tIle grOUlld9 In
tllis C011text Ustrllctures" shall il1clude sewer al1d water li11es, streets or btlildi11g COllstructioll.
TIle applicant shall specify in the applicatioll al1d to the COlnll1issiol1 alld COU11Cil a
constructio11 schedule alld cOlnpletio11 date of the project. If the cOlnpletiol1 date specified
for the project is exceeded, the conditio11al use application shall becolne null and void.
HOV\7ever, the applicant may sublnit an applicatioll for a time extel1sion on the project for
City COUI1Cil review~ The applicatiol1 for tilne extel1siol1 shall be sublnitted thirty (30) days
prior to the deadline for cOlnpletio11 of tile project as specified by t11e applicant9 For projects
requiring platting, the final plat Inust be recorded within this eigllteel1 (18) 11lonth period.
For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first
phase. In the event that the developlnellt is Inade ill successive contiguollS segIne11ts or
lTIultiple pllases, such phases sIlal1 be constructed within successive intervals of one (I) year
froln the original date of approval by the Council. If the successive phases are 110t
Sublllitted, wit11in tIle one (I) year il1telVal, the conditional approval of the future phases
shall be l1ull a11d void. The applical1t lnay request a tilne extensiOl1 thirty (30) days prior to
tIle expiration.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CI-IAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
47
(
c. The COlnlnission and Council may also prescribe a tilne period within which the perlnit
shall be cOlnpleted, perfected or b011ded. If the conditions of approval are 110t cOlnpleted or
bOl1ded within the specified tilne period, the permit shall lapse.
D. If reqttested ill writing prior to expiratioll, and tlpOll reCOlTIlnel1dation by the COlTIlnissiol1,
the Council may gral1t a one (I) year extension of a COl1ditional Use Pertuit for which worl(
has 110t beel1 COlll1nenced. Before recol111nel1ding such extel1sion1 the COffilnissiol1 shall
deterlnil1e w11ether sigllifical1t alnendl11ents to the COlnprehel1sive Plan or ZOlling
Ordil1al1ce will apply to the conditio11al use pertuit. TIle project s11all be evaluated by the
followil1g criteria: If sigl1ificant land llse cllanges have occurred in the area which will
impact, or be ilnpacted by the project; whether hazardolls situatiol1S have developed or have
been discovered in the project area; and whether cOlnmunity facilities and services appear to
110 longer be adequate for the project~ If any of the foregoing is found to exist with regard to
the project for whicl1 the extel1sion is soug11t, the extension shall not be granted al1d a public
hearil1g s11all be required, with a new applicatiol1 and fee sublnittal in accordance with
currel1t plalls and ordinallces. No 1110re than two (2) o11e.(I) year tilne extel1sions Inay be
gra11ted to a sil1gle conditiol1al use perIni t.
11~17-5 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING AND NOTICE: Prior to
approvillg a conditiol1al Use perlnit, t11e applica11t al1d the COffiluission a11d Council shall
follow notice and Hearing procedures provided in Sectiol1 11-15-5 of this Ordinance~
llw17-6 ACTION BY TI-IE COMMISSION: Withill forty-five (45) days
frol11 tIle hearillg, tIle COlTIlnissio11 shall trallSluit its reCOlTIlUendatiol1S to the COUI1Cil wit}l
sllpportive reasons~ TIle COlnll1issio111nay COl1tinue the matter froIn Ineetil1g to Ineeting if it
fil1ds that it does 110t have Sllfficient il1forll1atiol1 to malce a decisioll~ The COffilnission shall
recomlnelld that the applicatioll be approved with C011ditions, approved with lTIodifications and
conditio11S or del1ied~ The COlnmissiol1 sllall insure tllat any approval of an application with
conditiol1S, shall be in accordal1ce with the COlnprehensive Plan, tllis Ordinance and State Law.
11-17..7 APPEAL OF COMMISSION ACTION: See Sectiol1 II-15M?, Z011ing
AInendlnent Procedures.
11-1 7 -8
ACTION BY THE COUNCIL:
A. Hearing- See Sectioll 11-15-5, Zonil1g AInendlnent Procedures.
B. Upon gra11til1g of a COllditiol1al use perluit, COllditiol1S lnay be attached to the perluit , but
110t lilnited to, those conditions Wllich:
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
48
(~.-...
(.
't........ ..
1 ~ Miniluize adverse ilnpact on other developme11ts;
2. Control the sequence and timing of developlnel1t;
3. Control the dtlration of developlnent;
4. Assure that the developlnent is Inail1tained properly;
5. Designate tile exact location a11d- nattlre of tIle developlne11t;
6. Require the provision for 011-site or off-site pllblic facilities or services;
7. Require lllore restrictive stalldards than those generally required il1 this Ordinance; al1d
8. Require Initigatiol1 of adverse il11pacts of the proposed developlnent UpOl1 service delivery
by any political subdivision, inclllding school districts1 which provides services within the
planni11g jurisdictiol1.
c. Prior to granting a conditional use perruit1 the Council may request studies from tIle
plal1nil1g or public worl(s staff, or public agencies concerning the social, econolnic, fiscal, or
environlnental effects of the proposed conditiol1al use~ A COllditional use permit shall not be
COl1sidered a binding precedellt to gral1t other conditional use perl11its.
11-17-9 APPEAL OF COUNCIL ACTION: For reqllired procedures,
Adll1illistrative ProCedtlres Act of tIle State of Idaho, Idallo Code Sectio.n 67 -5215 b tllrough &
11-17-10
TRANSFERS AND MODIFICATIONS:
A. With the exceptioll of 110me occupatio11 and childcare facilities.! S;011ditiol1al tlSe perlnits,
once approved by the Comlnissiol1 and Council, run with tIle land, and upon sale of the
subject property are transferred to l1ew oWller(s) withollt furtller application or approval;
provided however, the new oWller(s) sllall be bOU11d by the saIne tilne limits and conditions
of appro\ral as the original perluit holder(s). A conditional use permit is not transferable
frolll one parcel of land to al1otller.
B. Conditiol1al use perlnits for home occupation al1d!or childcare facilities in allY district may
be transferred froIn old OWl1ers to new 0W11ers or old occupants to new occupants for the
saIne use for Wl1ich the origillal conditional use was granted by petitiol1ing tIle City Council.
The City COlII1Cil sllall hold a public l1earing on tIle petitioll after notice of said hearing
havil1g bee111nailed by first class lnail to all property owners wit11il1 t11ree l1undred feet
(300') of the external boundaries of the subject lal1d~
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
49
c. Upon writtel1 applicatiol1 by t11e 110lder of a COl1ditional use perInit, and follo"Wi11g a hearing
and recolnmendation by the COlTIlnissiol1, the Councillnay modify the COllditiol1S,
lilnitations and/or scope of the permit, in accordance "With the lilnitations and requirements
of Section 11-1 7..3 of this Ordinallce~ The Council may delegate to the COlnlnission and
Zoning Administrator authority to COl1sider and approve or deny specified Ininor
lTIodifications, provided such modificatiol1 was not the subject of appeal durillg the original
public hearing alld "Will not adversely impact adjacent properties~ Such lninor Inodificatiol1S
il1clude btlt are not lilnited to the follovvillg:
1. Staff Level Revie'\v:
a~ A reduction in density not exceeding twenty-five percent (25%) of the total units.
b~ Minor relocation of dwellillg units or building pads for practical reasons, such as
road aligl11nent, topography or access~
c~ Mi110r cllal1ges to tIle recreation area or open space desig11, but 110t elill1inatioll or
sigllificant reduction in area.
d. Increase in buildi11g square footage, 110t exceeding twenty percent (20%), provided
that the parlcing and lal1dscaping reqllirelnents are lnet.
2. COllllnission Review:
a. A sigl1ificant chal1ge il1 the development phasing plal1.
b ~ Clla11ge in proposed setbaclcs.
11-17-11 REVOCATION: A conditiol1al use pertuit Inay be revolced or lTIodified by
the City Council, upon notice and hearing, for breach or violation of any condition of approval
or liluitation of the perlnit. If City COU11Cil decides to revol<e a COl1ditiol1al use1 either on its
OWl1 action or upo"n complail1t to the City Council, The Council shall notify tIle pertuit holder
of its intel1tion to revol<e the COllditiollal Use Pertuit al1d provide the permit holder "With the
opportunity to contest the revocatio11~ Fifteen (15) days prior notice of the hearing shall be
givel1 to the pertuit holder and all property owners "Within three hU11dred feet (300') of the
boundaries of the land w11icll was iSStled the perlnit. City Council shall In ale e fil1dings of fact
and conclllsio11S of lavv supporting its decisiol1 to revol<e the conditio11al use perlnit~ If the
COU11Cil does 110t decide to revol<e tIle C011ditionalllse perluit, 110 fi11di11gS of fact and
COllclusions of la,iV sllall be Inade. An aggrieved perluit holder or cOlnplail1ant lnay appeal the
decision of the City COUI1Cil under tIle Adlninistrative Procedures Act of the State of Idaho,
Idaho Code Sectioll 67-5215(b) through (g). (Ord. 592, 11-17-92)
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND 50
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENTJ'
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
( ..
SECTION 9: That Chapter 6 of Title 12 uPlanned Development" Subdivision and
Developluent of the Meridian City Code) be, al1d the saIne is hereby repealed.
SECTION 1 0: That a new Chapter 6 of Title 12 uPlal1ned Developlnent" Subdivision and
Development of the Meridian City Code, be, and the saIne is hereby enacted to read as follows:
CHAPTER 6
PLAt1\INED DEVELOPMENTS
SECTION:
12-6-1:
12-6-2:
12-6-3 :
12-6-4:
12-6-5 :
12-6-6:
12-6.. 7:
12-6-8:
Purpose
Planned Development Standards
Use Exceptions
Residential Uses
Planned Developments In Old Town
Developer Incentives And Benefits
Application Procedure
Term Of Permits
12-6-1 : PURPOSE: A planned developmel1t (PD) is a parcel or cOlnbinatiol1 of
parcels of lal1d whicl1 is plallned and developed as a unit under single ownership or control. It
may COl1tai11 one or a lnixture of uses, types of buildings, as well as COInInO!1 open space,
c!llstered developll1e11t and/or recreatiol1al facilities.
TIle purpose of the plal111ed developlllent process is to provide opportul1ity for lal1d
developlnent tllat preserves al1d lltilizes l1attlral topographic, geologic alld scenic featllres;
allows a more efficient pattern of reside11tial, cOlnmercial and industrial uses; fosters il1110vative
desigt1 c011cepts and promotes flexibility in site desigt1; and provides for COlnlTIOl1 open space or
other alne11ities 110t found in traditio11allot-by-lot developlnel1t.
The plal111ed development process allows the Comluission and Council to allow lTIodifications
from the developlnent standards of the underlying zone in order to el1CQUrage Inixed-use
projects, a11d to perInit secondary uses which are integrated with al1d support the primary use.
Detailed plall11ed developlnel1t applications require a conditional use applicatiol1 and are
subject to all conditional use procedures set forth ill Cllapter 17. Concepttlal planned
developlnent applicatiol1S require a C011ditional use applicatiol1 and are subject to all
COl1ditiol1al use procedures set forth it1 Chapter 17, except for Section 11-17 ~2 -I & J (buildil1g
elevations and constructiol1 Inaterials/colors).
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
51
("
~. .
12-6~2:
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
A. The Council may approve plal1ned developlnents, Up011 recomlue11datioll by the
COll11nission, i11 accordallce vvith the follovvi11g stal1dards;
I. Deviations froIn the developlnel1t standards alld/or area requirelnents of the underlyil1g
zone Inay be approved.
2. Residential del1sity in a pla11ned developluent shall be calculated by lTIultiplying the net
residential area (gross acreage less office, cOffilnercial, or industrial use area) by the
maximum number of dwelling units per acre allowed for the zoning district ill which the
site is located. If there is no maxilnum density guideline for the zoning district vvithin
which a planned development is proposed, the maximtlffi allowable density shall be
fifte en (15 ) units per acre.
3~ AInenities: Two or more of the followil1g amenities shall be provided as part of each
planned development:
a. La11dscaped open space of at least ten percellt (1 0%) of the gross area, exclusive of
required street buffers and buffers betweel1 inCOlnpatible land uses~ (Landscaped
open space is mal1datory for all developluents and minimum Landscape Ordinance
requirelnents vvillll0t be COul1ted as all alnenity for the purposes of this provisiol1.)
b~ Private active recreational facilities such as a playground1 piCllic area, basl<etball or
tennis court, SvvilTIlning pool, clubhouse, etc., of a size suitable to Ineet the l1eeds of
the developlnent.
c. Provision for addition or public access to a neighborhood parle or other public opel1
space.
d~ A public pedestriall or bicycle circulation systelTI within the project (exclusive of
required sidewall<.s adjacent to public right-af-way) and connectil1g to existing or
pla1111ed pedestrial1 or bicycle routes outside the project (as designated ill the
Meridian Parl<s Departl11ent Pathway Plan), desigtled alld constructed in accordance
with standards set fortll by tIle Meridian ParIes COlnmission.
e~ Other al11e11ities appropriate to tl1e size a11d uses of the proposed development, as
lnay be proposed by the applicant and approved by the Comlnission al1d Council.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
52
(.. .
j.
\..
4. All residential planned developlllents shall provide each dwelling Ul1it with at least one
hundred (100) square feet of useable private open space1 such as patio or declc. The
COlnlnission and Council shall judge eac11 project on its 0W11 qualities, alld may
recolnlnend deviations froIn this open space requirement when it is satisfied that the
private and COlnmon open space proposed Ineets the intent and pllrpose of the
ordinance.
5. Setbaclcs: Along tIle perip11ery of the pla11ned development, the applicable setbacl<s as
establisl1ed by the zOlling district in which the project resides shall 110t be reduced.
Specialland.scape buffers betweel1 differil1g uses as set forth in tIle La11dscape
Ordil1ance (Title 12, Chapter 13) shall apply to plal111ed developl11ents.
Attac11ed structures Inay be perlnitted in planned developlnents with strict cOlnpliance
wit11 the Ul1iforlTI Building Code reqllirements for party al1d fire separatiol1 walls. The
IninilllUlTI separation between detached structures shall be ten feet (1 0') unless fire or
building codes require greater separation.
6. Driveways1 streets and pathways: Driveways to one: and two:falnily dwellings shall not
be less thall nine feet (9') in widtll. Service driveways, drive-through lanes al1d escape
lanes shall have a IninilTItllTI width of ten feet (I 01) per lal1e, without parl<ing on either
side. Publicly dedicated streets shall be designed and constructed to Ada COUl1ty
Higllway District standards. Private streets lnay be approved by the COUl1Cil and the
followil1g road.way standards sllall apply:
a. Up to three (3) dwelling Ul1its with a roadway less tllal1 two hllndred feet (200') i11
lel1gth - twenty-four-foot (24') roadvvay with a five-foot (5') sidewall( 011 one (1)
side located. ill an easelne11t.
b~ Up to three (3) dwellil1g tlnits with a roadway greater thaIl two 11undred feet (200')
in length - twe.nty-eight-foot (28') roadway with a five-foot (5') sidewallc on one
side located in al1 easemel1t.
c. Fottr (4) to ten (10) dwellil1g llnits on a roadway less thal1 two hUl1dred feet (200')
illlengtll) - twellty-follr-foot (24') roadway with five-foot (5') sidewall( on botll
sides located within an easelnellt.
d. Four (4) to tell (10) dwellillg units 011 a roadway greater than two hundred feet
(200') in lengt11) - forty-two-foot (42') right..of-way with tvventy-ni11e..foot (29')
section froll1 bac1< of curb to bacIc of ctlrb;r with five-foot (5') sidewall<s required on
both sides.
ZONING REGULATIONS t'CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
53
e. Eleven (II) or more dvvellil1g units - forty-two-foot (42') right~of~way with a
twenty-nine-foot (29') section and five-foot (5') sidewallcs 011 both sides.
f. Construction standards (i.e., gravel base, pavelnent depth and cOffilJaction testing
requirelnents) of all private roads shalllneet t11e standards of Ada County Hig11way
District for a local road.
7 . The c011cept and detailed conditional use applicatio11S are both subject to the public
hearing requirelnents of Section 11-15-5 and Conditional Use Requirelnents of Cllapter
17.
8. Concurrent review of other applications Inay be required. 111 cases where a subdivision
is being proposed or would be required, concurrent review of t11e detailed. conditional
use alld subdivisio11 plat is required when tIle Zonillg Adll1inistrator detern1ines that
regulatiol1S of tIle subdivision ordi11a11ce apply to the design of the proposed
developluent.
12-6-3: USE EXCEPTIONS: Upon reCOlnlnendation of the COlTIlnission,
the COU11cillnay authorize specific uses not normally perlnitted by the use regulatiolls of the
zone in which the developlnellt is located. III gra11ting such autllorizatiol11 the Comlnissioll and
Council shalltnal(e the follovving fi11dings:
I. The uses perlnitted by tIle exceptioll are strongly related to the prillcipal use of the
developlnel1t, a11d have the purpose of providil1g services or facilities useful or
COll1plelne11tary to the prilnal)' use.
2. No 1110re tllall twel1ty perce11t (20%) of tl1e total area of the project shall .be devoted to
the uses perlnitted by the exceptiol1. The percel1tage of use exception allowed will be
deterl11il1ed by the COll11Uissioll al1d Council based llpon the size of the project and
i11tensity of the use exceptiol1S.
3. The developlnent vvill be phased so that COllstruction of the excepted use or uses will be
justified by COl1struction of all or a proportio11ate alnOltnt of the principal or prilnary
use or uses.
4. The uses permitted by tIle exceptioll are il1tegrated into the overall project by:
a. Beil1g located ill proxilnity to alld withi11 convel1ient walldng distance of the
primary llses~
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
54
{
\"
(. .
b~ Utilizing OIle or Inore of the lnain vellicular accesses to the prilnary use site as the
Inain access to the exception site or interc011nection tllrougll a systelTI of private
roadways and/or pathways.
c. Providing pedestriall a11d bicycle pathway con11ectiollS with the primary use site~..
d. Oriel1til1g btlildil1gs 011 the exception site to facilitate vellicular and/or pedestrial1
access frDIn the prilnary use site.
e. Contil1uil1g architecture, landscapillg, al1d bllilding bulle concepts froIn the prilnary
use illtO the use of tIle exception site so they are consistel1t and harlnol1ious
throughout the developlnent.
5. The ttse(s) perlnitted by tIle exception are neighborllood: or COlnlTIUnity:serving in size
and character al1d not regional, al1d are 110t detrimental to adjacent neighborhoods in
location and cllaracter.
12~6-4
RESIDENTIAL USES:
A. A variety of housil1g types lnay be included within a single pIa.nned development, includil1g
attaclled units (townholnes, duplexes), detached units (patio hOlnes), sil1gle falnily and
lTIulti-falllily U11its, regardless of the underlying zOlling classification of the site, provided
that the overall density limit of the zone is Inaintail1ed~
B. Reside11tial I11fill Planlled Developlnents: Lots and parcels of five (5) acres or less vvitllin the
City of Meridian, Wl1ich are located il1 areas already substal1tially. developed [at least eight
perce11t (80% )of t.he Ialld area withi11 tllree hundred. feet (300') of the .bouI1daries of the
parcel], al1d to which lTIUllicipal services (sewer, vvater, fire, police and schools) are alread.y
available lnay qualify for infill developlIlent~ UpOll reCOlTIlnendation of the COlnmissiol1, the
Councillnay approve exceptiollS to Section 12-6-2 as follows:
I. The applicant shall submit "With the C011ditio11al use application1 verificatiol1 that the site
qualifies as all infill site. Tllis verificatiol11nay be in the forill of recent aerial
photographs. 111 addition, the applicant shall provide documentation of the availability
to the site of water, sewer, fire flow a11d fire protection and school capacity.
2. The COU11cillnay allow up to a twelltyw.five percent (25%) increase ill the density allowed
for the site llllder the zone as an i11fill incel1tive.
3. The COUI1Cil may also grant a waiver of the alnenity requiremel1t set fortll in Section 12-
6-2 with a recommendation from the COlnlnission.
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS I 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
55
........ ... .
( ..
i~ ..
f .
~~~:.: . .
12-6-5 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS IN OLD TOWN: Proposed planned
developments in the Old Town zonil1g district which include a Inixture of residential and
COlTIlnercial or office uses shall be allowed a maxilnulll reside11tial density of forty-five (45)
dwellings per acre, and the followil1g developmel1t standards:
Mi11imlllTI Lot Area; No IninimUlTI
Front Setbaclc: 15 feet
Rear, Interior Side, Street Side Setbacl<.s: 0 feet
MaxilnUlTI Lot Coverage: 100 % of non-setbacl< area
MaxilTIUln Building Height: 40 feet
Minilnum Street Frontage: No IninilllUlTI
12-6-6
DEVELOPER INCENTIVES AND BENEFITS:
A. Plan11ed d.evelopll1ents are intended to provide particular benefits to t11e public and to the
developer through the Inixture of uses and i11tegrated nature of the projects. Pllblic bellefit is
e11sured by the provision of public improvelnents and tIle alnenities required by Section 12-
6-2, al1d, for infill developlnellts~ by the increased efficiel1CY of the use of land and public
services. To provide the developer witll an incentive to utilize the pla1111ed developlnent
process, tIle followi11g deviations from cOllvel1tiol1al developlnellt stalldards may be
illcOrporated into a planned developlnellt proposal:
1. A variety of 11ol1sing types l11ay be il1cluded i11 tIle plall11ed developlnent.
2. The nlinilTIUlTI lot size for each buildi11g alld setbacl<s for buildings witlli11 the project
Inay be reduced belo,JV those llorlnally reqtlired for the zOlling district.
3. PI allned. developlnellts lnay include private streets and service drives, if d.esiglled and
constructed to Ada County Highway District standards and in accordal1ce witll Section
12-6-2MOA.6, and as approved by the Council.
4. Uses not 110rlnally perlnitted ill tIle zOlling district l11ay be allowed as part of a planned
developluellt, up to the twenty percellt (20%) lilnit established il1 Sectiol1 12-6-3 of this
ordil1al1ce.
5. Bllildil1gS lnay be clustered to preserve scellic or ellvironlnel1tally sel1sitive areas il1 the
llatural state, or to consolidate slnall opel1 spaces illtO larger, lTIOre usable areas for
COlTIlTI011 use alld enjoYlne11t.
6. The conditiol1S of t11e approval established for a large plan11ed developlnent shall be
consistently appli~d to each subsequent pllase of the developlnent, ull1ess specifically
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAP~rER 6 OF TITLE 12
56
agreed to otherwise during tIle approval process, or ul11ess Inodified per Section 11-1 7-
10.
7. A residential del1sity bonus may be given for dedications of land for public use as school, park.)
fire station or recreational facility provided to the public entity by donation or at a cost less thart,
or equal to, the applicant's pre-development cost for that land. The bonus shall not exceed ten
perce11t (10%) of the units permitted by the zone 011 the undedicated portion of the land~
12-6" 7
APPLICATION PROCEDURE:
A. Prior to the subInission of an application for a planned development, the applicant shall
contact the Planning Department and arrange for a pre-application conference with the
planning and zoning staff. The purpose of this cOl1ference is to provide guidance to the
developer in preparing l1is applicatiol1. Tllerefore, the developer should request the Ineeting
well before preparing tIle application materials. A draft site plan and preliminary plat map
(if required) shall be available at the pre~applicatiolllneeting.
B. A planned developlnent lnay be sublnitted and processed as a concept plan. The applicant
must specify the applicatiol1 and site plal1 that c011cept approval is being requested. A
cOl1cept approval is a statelnel1t by the City of Meridian that a gel1eral development pIal1
including the arrangelnellts of uses, del1sity, locatiol1 of Inajar streets, open spaces, utilities,
etCt) is acceptable~ A cOl1cept review allows the applicant to obtain approval of a general
developlnent plan without incurring the expense of detailed building plal1s until after
cOI1cept approval~ It provides tile developer and the City with guidelines for the desig11 of
each phase of the project. Supporting inforlnatiolllnay be required by the Z011il1g
Administrator on issues of Inajor ilnportance for tIle project.
Each phase of a concept approval requires detailed conditional use approval through a l1ew
applicatioll, fee and public hearing. The only exception to the detailed conditio11al use
requirement is single falnily dwellings proposed as the prilnary use within a developme11t.
The single-faluily dwelling portioll of the project shall be reviewed i11 detail under
Subdivision Requirelnents of C11apter 3.
c. Every plal1ned developnlel1t requires a conditional use applicatio11, includil1g all plans a11d
inforluation required by Chapter 17. C011ceptual planned developments are exelnpt froIn
Sectio11 11-1 7 -2 (I & J), all other provisions shall apply. Phasing plans shall be illcluded if
the project is to be phased~ The application is subject to the public hearing requirelnents of
Sectiol1 11-15-5 and Chapter 17.
D. Concurrent review of other applications lnay be required as determined by the Zonil1g
Administrator. III cases where subdivision platti11g would be l1ecessaryJ concurrent review of
the conditional use (for detailed pla11ned developlnel1t applicatio11s) is required.
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USESu AND 57
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
E9 Processil1g of the applications a11d actions of the COlTIlnissiol1 al1d COUI1Cil are the same as
otller COl1ditional use applicatiol1s.
12-6-8 TERM OF PERMITS:
Il1itiation of worl< on an approved pla1111ed developlne11t lTIUSt tal<e place within eighteen (18)
lTIonths, as set forth in Section 11-17 -4. All phases of the planned developmel1t shall be
cOlnpleted withil1 five (5) years of tIle date of approval; approval of any Ul1initiated phases will
lapse after t11at tilne u11less a tilne extel1sion is granted by the COUllCil.
SECTION II: All ordil1a11ces, resolutiollS, orders or parts thereof il1 COl1flict
l1erewith are hereby repealed, rescil1ded and annulled.
SECTION 12: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that allY
section, paragraph1 sentence or word of this Ordil1ance as adopted and amended herein be
declared for al1Y reaSOl1 to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would
have passed all otller portions of this Ordil1ance il1dependent of tIle elilnillation 11erefrom of
any portiol1 as may be declared invalid.
SECTION 13: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or
proceedillg COllllnenced or right accrued before this Ordil1al1ce tal<es effect.
SECTION 14: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
after its passage, approval and publicatio11, according to law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
26#l day of d~ , 200 1.
ZONING REGULATIONS uCONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT apLANNED DEVELOPMENT])
REPEALING CHAPTERS 17 OF TITLE II AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
58
(
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 2bfA. day of
d~ ,2001.
Attest;
Q-m ~f L
~ DJ&ll . E
~.~ ~ ~
Conditional UsesOrd.doc .~.t?,,A. 'OJ' '",r'r1""'J - (j.~
~!t c..nrifl i I" \.\'
AtJ.1J!' ~'1<:.t ~.. ,,~... ~ .<llt'\ ,-S
.1 'i. ~v_~~ ~~.:;l~t
ZONING REGULATIONS "CONDITIONAL USES" AND
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT uPLANNED DEVELOPMENT"
REPEALING CHAPTERS 1 7 OF TITLE 11 AND CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 12
59
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 06-05-01
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A )
COMMERCIAL )
DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING )
FUELING STATIONS, DRIVE- )
THRU, COFFEE SHOP, CAR )
WASH AND RETAIL IN )
PROPOSED C-C ZONE, )
LOCATED AT 119 S. LINDER )
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
VAN HEES PROPERTIES, )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-O 1-0 II
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
The above el1titled conditional use permit application having COl11e
before tIle City Council on June 5, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 p.ln., at Meridian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridiall, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planlling and. Zoning
Adlnil1istrator, appeared and testified, and appearil1g al1d testifying on behalf of the
Applicant were JoAnn Butler and TOlTI Roaln, and the Applicant, Larry Van Hees,
appeared and testified, alld 110 one appeared il1 opposition, a11d tile City Council
l1aving duly COl1sidered the evidel1ce a11d tile record in this matter al1d the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I
Recomlnendations to City COUI1Cil issued by the Plannillg and Zoning COffilnission
who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard al1d tal<en oral and
written testilnony, and havil1g duly COllsidered the matter, the City COUI1Cil hereby
Ina!(eS the followil1g Filldings of Fact, Conclusio11S of Lavv and Decisiol1 and Order to~
wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. A notice of a public hearil1g on the conditiol1al use permit was published
for two (2) consecutive weel<s prior to the said public hearing scheduled for June 5,
2001, before the City Council, the first Pllblicatiol1 appearing and written 110tice
having beel) mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred.
feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property ul1der consideration lnore than
fifteen (IS) days prior to said llearing and with the notice of public hearing having
beell posted llpOl1 the IJroperty ul1der COllsideration lTIOre thal1 Oile weel( before said
hearil1g al1d the copies of allllotices were Inad.e available to newspaper, radio alld
televisio11 stations as public service a1111ouncelnel1ts; and the lnatter having beel1 duly
considered by the City Council at the June 5, 2001, public hearil1g; and the
applicant, affected property 0W11ers, and governlnent subdivisions providing services
within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridial11 having beel1 given full
opponU11ity to express COlnlnents and submit evidence.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2
_...:~
f .
~::.....
C:..: .
2. There has been cOlnpliance with allllotice and hearil1g requiremel1ts set
forth ill Idaho Code 96 7 -6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code 99 11..15 - 5 and 11..1 7 ~
5 as evidel1ced by the Mfidavit of Mailing, and the Mfid-avit of Publication and Proof
of Posting filed with the staff report.
3. This proposed developlnent reqllest is ill a C-G zone al1d by reaSOl1 of
the provisions of the Meridian City Code s 11-17 -4, a public hearillg was required
before the City Council on this application.
4. The property is located at 119 S. Linder Road, Meridian, Idaho.
5. The owner of record of the subject property is Larry Van Hees of Boise,
Id-aho.
6. Applicant is owner of record.
7 . The subj ect property is currently zoned R H 1 ~ However, there is an
applicatioll before the City Council for annexation al1d zoning to C-C. The zoning
district of C-C is defined- within the City of Meridian Zonillg and Developlnellt
Ordil1ance, Section 11-7-2.
8. The proposed applicatiol1 requests a conditional use perluit for a
comlnercial developlnent consisti11g of ftleling stations, drive-thru, coffee Sl10P, car
wash and retail. The C..C zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning
and Developluent Ordinance requires a conditional use pertuit be obtained for lnost
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 3
uses i11clduing those required by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and
Development Ordinance, Sectio11 11-8-1).
9. The Meridia11 City COllllCil recogIlizes tllat the proposed application is
not in compliance with the Meridian COlnprehensive Plan. However 1 the Plan is
currently under review and this area is being considered for some comluercial
desigl1ation.
10. The use proposed withi11 the subject applicatioll will in fact, constitute a
COl1ditional use as deterlnined by City Ordil1ance.
11. The Meridian City Council talces judicialllotice of its Zoning,
Subdivisiol1 alld Development Ord.inallces codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian
City Code and all current Z011il1g maps thereof and the Comprehellsive Plan of tIle
City of Meridian, alld Maps and the Ordillance establishing the Ilnpact Area
Boundary.
12. Giving dtle consideration to the COlnlnent received froIn the
governlnental subdivisions providil1g services in the City of Meridian plannillg
jurisdictiol1 public facilities and services required by the proposed development will
not ilnpose expense upon the public if the following C011ditiol1S of developluent are
ilnposed and the followillg is also found to be required to mitigate tIle effects of tIle
proposed use a11d developlne11t UpOl1 services delivered by political subdivisiollS
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 4
providil1g services to the subject real property withi11 the planning jurisdiction of the
City of Meridian, al1d with the exceptiol1 of the zoning of C~G for the cOffilnercial
lots which is recolulnel1ded to be C-C subject to the following:
Adopt the ReCOlTIlnendations of the Plan11ing and Zoning and Engineering staff
as follows:
12~ 1 A IninilTIUlTI 8..foot-wide lalldscaping buffer shall be installed along the
entire length of the southern property lil1e as required by the Landscape
Ordinance for a buffer between the residelltial and commercial uses.
12.2 A two-inch caliper tree shall be installed in this area for every 35 lillear
feet of landscape buffer.
12~3 An eight-foot-talllnasonry fellce shall be located along the entire length
of tIle sout11ern property lille to help shield the residents frOlTI 11oise,
and shall be conti11uously Inaintail1ed ill good repair, a11d the fence shall
be constructed prior to issuance of building .perlnits. Additio11aIly, tIle
locatio11 of t11e fence in relation to the existi11g trees is to be worl(ed- out
between the affected property owners and approved by Planni11g and
Zoning staff.
12. 4 Lal1dscapillg alo11g Frallldin al1d Lillder Road sllall be il1stalled as
sublnitted, with the addition of at least three lnore two-inch caliper
trees; two on Franl<li11 Road and 011e in the center of tIle landscape strip
adjacent to the escape lane of the restaurant~ The purpose of the
additional trees is to have 011e two-inch caliper tree per 35 lil1ear feet of
lal1dscaping along the street and alol1g parl<ing areas as required by City
Ordinance.
12.5 The applicant shall apply for a Planned Sign ProgralTI in accordance
with the Sign Ordinance~ The type, location and number of SigI1S
reqtlested sllall be alnel1ded to cOlnply with the Sign Ordinance.
12.6 Additional trash receptacles shall be required adjacent to the l1ew coffee
ldosl( for patron refuse.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 5
I
(<..
12.7 Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via extensions froIn
an existing eiglltMinch dialneter stub from Fralll<lin Road. The depth of
this stub lnay or may not provide service within the City of Meridian's
design standards for Ininirnum cover and pipe slopes to all areas in this
proposed developlnent. AlternatelY7 the applicant lnay wal1t to consider
sewering this site to the southwest, across land under their ownership]
to the stub under Ten Mile Creelc. Applicant shall be responsible to
construct the sewer lnains to alld through tl1is proposed developlnellt.
Subdivision desigt1er to coordinate Inai11 sizing and routi11g with the
Public Worl(s Depa:t;tlnent~ The City is in the process of planning for a
new sanitary sewer relief Inaill adjacent to this parcel 011 the Lillder
Road frontage. Routing alignlnent for this Inain has not been
established as of this date, and the City may potentially need to acquire
an easement for the installation.
12~8 Water service to this site shall be via extel1sions from existing mains in
Franldin Road and Lillder Road. Applicant shall be responsible to
construct the water mains to and through this proposed development
(looped). Subdivision desigtler to coordinate lnain sizing and routing
with the Public W Or1(5 Departmellt. Applical1t sllall provide the Public
W orl(s Departlnent with il1forlnatioll on anticipated fire flow and
dOll1estic water requirelnents for the proposed site~ Flow al1d pressure
from the existing Inains shall be Inonitored witll the Meridian Water
Departll1e11 t.
12.9 RV Parl<il1g is ShOWl1 at the northeast corl1er of tIle property. The
parl<ing shall be 0111y for short-terlTI parl<ing for patrons of the
comlnercial establishment, and not for overnight use.
12.10 Applicant shall be required to install alternative Inethods of car wash
warnillg systems (e.g., il1terior flashing lights) and speal(er systems for
drivew.thru facilities (e.g., telephone systelTIs) in lieu of typical11oise-
generating systems.
12.11 Any Inodificatiol1S to tIle site plan, including any future developlnent on
Lots I and 2, sllall require approval as a planned development Ul1der the
conditional use process.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6
(,.., .
(:..:..,..
12.12 Off-street parlcing shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Zoning and Developluent Ordinance and/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements.
12.13 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth
in Sections 11-13-4.0. al1d 11-13M4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
al1d Developlnent Ordinance and ill accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirelnents.
12. 14 A drainage plan designed by a S tate of Idaho licensed archi teet or
engil1eer is required alld shall be sublnitted to the City Engineer
(Drd. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parldng areas~ StarIn water
treatlnent al1d disposal must be designed il1 accordance with
Departlnent of Ellviro111nental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
StarIn Water Best Managelnent Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridial1 sta11dards alld policies. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prohibited unless tile jurisdiction which has autllority
over the receivillg strealTI provides written authorization prior to
developlnent plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applicatio11S with the Idaho Departlnent of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
12.15 Outside lighting shall be d,esigned alld placed in such a Inanner as to
elilni11ate glare and illulninatiol1 of the adjoining roadways and
properties, ill accorda11ce with City Ordinance Secti 011 11-13 -4. C.
12.16 All sigllage shall be in accordance vvith the standards set fortIl in Sectiol1
11-14 of the City Zoning and Developlnent Ordinance.
12. I 7 All constructiol1 shall c011forln to the requirements of the .AInericans
with Disabilities Act.
12.18 Trash enclosures shalllneet the requirements of the Sanitary Service
COlnpal1Y's guidelines for location and size.
12.1 9 Applicallt's (or successor's) failure to cOlnply witll any of the terlns of
approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of
the conditional use perluit.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT - 7
12.20 COl1ditions specified in tIle annexatio11 and zoning application (AZMOI..
007) shall also apply.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Nalnpa & Meridian Irrigation District as
follows:
12.21 A Land Use Change/Site Developlnent application shall be filed for the
conditiollal use perInit.
Adopt the Meridian Fire Department1s ReCOlTIlnendations as follows:
12.22 All codes, including fire hydrants1 water and fire sprinlder systelns shall
be Inet and approved by all City departlnents.
Adopt the Central District Health Departlnent ReCOlTIlnendatio11S as follows:
12.23 The Applicant's celltral sewage al1d cel1tral water plans shall be
sublnitted to and approved by the Idallo Departlnent of Health &
Welfare, Oivisiol1 of EnvirOllmental Quality.
12..24 RUll-off is not to create a IllOSquito breeding problelu.
12.25 StorlTIWater shall be pretreated tllfOUgh a grassy swale prior to discharge
to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water
qtlality; or if other lneans of pretreatmel1t of storluwater discharge is
provided, then Applicant shall furnish to tIle Public W orl(s Departlnent
a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, inclllding a
schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A COffiluitment sllall be
required that in the event the drains do not effectively worlc, either
through problelTIS with design or Inaintellance, developlnent of new
plans for a Ineans to prevent the storrnwater discllarge shall be required.
Additionally, the Applical1t shall cOlnply with the following requirements by
action of the City Council at their JU11e 5,2001, Ineetillg as follows:
12.26 The project shall be treated as a Plallned Developlnent with a Mixed
Use.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 8
..( .
.. i~
12.27 The hours of operation shall be as follows:
C-Store: 6 alTI until lnidnigllt ("possibly 5 aln")
Artie Circle: UlltillO pm Sunday - Thursday and II pIn Friday &
Saturday
Fuel pUlnps: 24 hours-credit card. sales
Car wash: the hours shall be lilnited so that noise frOITI the car wasIl
s11all not constitute a nuisance to any of the adjacent neigllbors.
12.29 The Applica11t sllall cOlnply witll the Ada County Highway District's
recommendations in their letter dated April 18, 200 I, including botll
Site Specific Requirements alld Standard Requirements. Additionally, if
ACHD amend their recoffirnendations, then the Applicant shall be
required to cOlnply with any amendments thereto.
13. The proposed uses withi11 the subject applicatio.n will not be
harlnOllious with and in accordallce witll tIle Meridiall Comprehensive Pla11 and the
City of Meridian Zoning and Developmellt Ordil1ance, however, the Plan is cllrrently
Ullder review al1d this area is being C011sidered for SOlne COlTIlnercial desig11atioll,
which tllen would be harlnonious because:
13~ I The subject property is designated 011 the uGel1eralized Land Use Map'J
as "Single-fatuily Residential".
14. Tile uses proposed withill the subject application subject to the
conditions herei11 ordered will be desigtled, constructed, operated and Inaintained to
be harlTIOnious and appropriate ill appearance or intellded character of the general
vicinity and that SUCll uses will not change the il1tended essential character of the
saine area~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 9
I~:~ .. . ..
{" . .
15. The uses proposed within the subject application willll0t be hazardous
or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served
adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police
and fire protection, drai11age structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
17. The uses proposed withil1 the subject application will not illvolve uses,
activities, processes, materials, eqtlipment and COllditions of operation that will be
detrilnental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive
production of traffic, noise, slTIol<e, ftllnes, glare or odors.
18. The developlnent will not result i11 tIle destruction, loss or dalnage of
natural or scenic feature of major ilnportance relating to the property.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I. The City of Meridian sllall exercise tIle IJowers cOllferred tlpOn it by the
"Local Land Use Plannillg Act of 1975'J hereillafter referred to for C011venie11ce as the
UActU codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.e. ~67 -6503).
2. The Meridian City COUllCil may exe):"cise all the powers required and
authorized ul1der the "ActJJ except tIle power to adopt ordi11ances by the
establishment of a Planning and Zoning COlnlnission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho
Code Section 67-6504 whicll the City Council of the City of Meridiall l1as
established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I 0
/
(
) .
~. :..
Ordina11ce" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridia11 City Code.
3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council call, subject to hearing
and notice provision required, provide for the process of special alld/or conditional
use perlnits Wl1ich a proposed use is othelWise prohibited by the terms of the
ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of tIle ordinance
which the City of Meridian has done in the adoptioll of its zoning ordinances.
4. The City COUl1cilllas the duty al1d responsibility to review the facts
and circumstances of each applicatioll for special use perluit to deterlnine prior to
gral1til1g the saIne that the evidential showillg supports the findillg that the followil1g
standards are met and that the proposed developlnel1t: (Meridian City Code 9 11-17-
3)
a~ Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as deterll1ined by City policy;
b. Will be harrnol1ious with and in accordance with the COlnprehensive
Plan alld this Ordinallce;
c. Will be designed, constructed, operated alld lnaintained to be
harlnollious and appropriate in appearal1ce with tIle existing or intended character of
the general vicillity and that StIch tlSe will not change the essential character of the
saIne area;
d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring
uses;
e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities al1d services such
as highways, streets, police and fire protectio11, drail1age structures, refuse disposal,
water, sewer or that the persoll respo11sible for the establishlnent of proposed
C011ditional use shall be able to provide adeqtlately any StIch services;
f~ Will not create excessive additional requirelnents at public cost for
public facilities and services al1d will110t be detrimental to the economic welfare of
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 11
(
the commUl1ity;
g. Will not illvolve uses1 activities, processes, lnaterials, equipment and
COllditions of operatioll that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the
gel1eral welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, 11oise, smol(e, furnes, glare
or odors;
h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or dalnage of a natural or scenic
feature of l11ajor importance.
5. Prior to granting a conditiollal use pertuit in the COlnmUl1ity Business
District (C-C), a public hearing shall be COl1ducted with 110tice to be published alld
provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three lltllldred feet (300')
of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditiol1al use
pertuit all in accordance witll the provisions of Meridian City Code 9 11-1 7 -5 City of
Meridian Zoning al1d Developmel1t Ordi11a11ce, which provides as follows:
uPrior to approving a Conditio11al Use Perluit, the applical1t and the
COffilnission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided
ill Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use
applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and cOlulnercial districts
shall only be required to have OIle public heari11g which shall be held before
the Plan11ing and Zoning COllllnission; and after the recolnmendation of the
COlnmission is lnade, the application shall go before the City Council without
a public hearing and the Councillllay approve, deny, or lTIodify the
recolnlnendation of the COffilnissiol1. JJ
6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of
tIle public hearing the COlnrnission shall, translnit its reCOlTIlnendations to the
Meridian City COUllCil with sllpportive reasons~ The COlllmissioll shall recolnmend
tllat the application be approved, approved with COllditions or denied. The
COIUIUissio11 shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 12
( .
application shall be in accordance with Meridian COlnprehensive Plan, City of
Meridial1 Zonillg and Developmel1t Ordinance, and Idaho State law~ (Meridian City
Codes 11-17-6)
7. When the City COU11Cil approves a conditional use perlnit it may
ilnpose COllditio11S of that approval that reasonably:
A. Minilnize adverse ilnpact 011 other developtnent;
B. Control the seque11ce and timing of development;
c. Control the duration of development;
D. Assure that the development is lnailltained property;
E. Designate the exact locatiol1 alld nature of the developlnent;
F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and
G~ Require lnore restrictive standards than those generally required, in this
Ordi11al1ce.
8. T11e City of Meridiall11as, by ordil1ance, established the Ilnpact Area
and the Comprehel1sive Plan of the City of Meridiall, which was adopted Decenlber
21,1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps.
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 13
./0:.... .
(:.....
/~
(
hereby ORDER and this does Order that:
1. That the above nalned applicant is grallted a conditionalllse perluit for
a commercial development consistil1g of fuelil1g stations7 drive-thru, coffee ShOP1 car
wash and retail in a C-C zone located at 119 S. Lillder Road, Meridian, Idaho,
subject to the followi11g COllditions of use and development, subject to the following:
Adopt the ReCOlTIlnendatio11S of the Pla1111ing and Zoning and Engineering staff
as follows:
1.1 A luinilnUlTI 8-foot-wide landscaping buffer shall be installed alo11g the
entire length of the southern property line as required by tIle Landscape
Ordinance for a buffer betwee11 the residential and cOlnmercial uses.
1.2 A two-inch caliper tree shall be installed in this area for every 35 linear
feet of landscape buffer.
1.3 At1 eight-foot-tall masonry fence shall be located along the entire length
of the southern property line to help shield the residel1ts froIn noise,
and shall be continuously Inaintained in good repair, and the fence shall
be constructed prior to issuance of building permits. Additionally, tIle
locatiol1 of the fellce in relatio11 to the existing trees is to be worl<ed. out
betwee11 the affected property OWllers and approved by Planni11g alld
ZOl1ing staff.
1.4 Lalldscapil1g along Frall1dil1 al1d Lil1der Road shall be i11stalled as
sublnitted, with the addition of at least three more tWO-il1Ch caliper
trees; two on Franl<lin Road and 011e il1 the center of the landscape strip
adjacel1t to the escape lal1e of the restaurant. The ptlrpose of the
additiol1al trees is to have one tWO-i11Ch caliper tree per 35 linear feet of
landscaping along the street and along parl<ing areas as required by City
Ordina11ce.
1.5 The applicant shall apply for a Plalllled Sign Prograln in accordance
with the Sigtl Ordinance. The type, location and number of signs
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~ 14
t.
requested shall be anlellded to COll1ply with the Sign Ordinance.
1.6 Additional trash receptacles shall be required adjacent to tIle new coffee
l<.ioslc for patron refuse.
1.7 Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via extensions from
an existing eight-inch dialneter stub froIn Franldin Road. The depth of
this stub 111ay or Inay not provide service withil1 the City of Meridian's
design sta11dards for Inil1ilTItllll cover and pipe slopes to all areas in this
proposed developlnellt. Alternately, the applicant may wallt to consider
sewering this site to tIle southwest, across land under their ownership,
to the stub under Ten Mile Creel(. Applical1t shall be responsible to
construct the sewer Inail1S to and through this proposed developlnent.
Subdivision designer to coordinate lnain sizing and routing with the
Public Worl<s Departlnent. The City is in the process of planning for a
new sanitary sewer relief mail1 adjacent to this parcel on the Linder
Road frontage. Routing alignment for this main has not been
established as of this date, alld the City lnay potelltially need to acquire
an easement for the installatiol1.
1.8 Water service to this site shall be via extensiOlls frorTI existing mains ill
Franldill Road and Linder Road. Applicant shall be responsible to
C011struct tIle water Inains to al1d through this proposed developlnent
(looped). Stlbdivision designer to coordinate main sizil1g al1d routing
with the Public W or1(8 Departlnent. Applicant shall provide the Public
Worl<.s Departlne11t with illforlnatiol1 011 anticipated fire flow alld
domestic water requirelnents for the proposed site. Flow and pressure
froIn the existing luains shall be lnonitored with the Meridian Water
Departlnel1t.
1.9 RV Parldllg is shown at the 110rtheast corner of the property. The
parl<i11g shall be DIlly for short~terln parlcing for patrons of the
cOlnlnercial establisll1nel1t, and 110t for overnight use.
1.1 0 Applicant shall be required to install alternative methods of car wash
war11il1g systelTIS (e~g~, i11terior flashil1g lights) and speal(er systelTIS for
driveOAthru facilities (e.g., telephone systelTIs) i111ieu of typical noise..
gelleratil1g systelns~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 15
t.. .
1.11 Any lnodifications to the site plan1 including any future development on
Lots 1 alld 2, shall require approval as a planned developlnent under the
conditiollal use process.
1.12 Off-street parlcillg shall be provided in accordance with Sectiol1 11-13 of
tIle City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordina11ce and/or as
detailed in site-specific reqtlirelnents.
1.13 Paving and striping shall be ill accordal1ce with the standards set forth
i11 Sections 11-13-4.0. alld 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
and Developlnent Ordinance and il1 accordance with .A1nericans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirelnel1ts.
1.14 A drainage plal1 desigt.led by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
el1gineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off..street parlcing areas. StorIn water
treatlnent and disposal must be designed in accordance with
Departmellt of Enviroll1nental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storln Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridia11 standards and policies. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prohibited ul1less the jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving strealn provides written atlthorization prior to
developme11t plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
l1ecessary applications with the Idallo Departlnel1t of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Illjection Wells.
1.15 Outside lightil1g shall be designed and placed i11 such a Inanner as to
elilninate glare and illulnination of tIle adjoining roadways and
properties, in accordal1ce with City Ordil1al1ce Section II M 13-4~C.
1.16 All sigl1age shall be in accordallce with the standards set forth in Section
11-14 of the City Zonil1g and Developluent Ordinance.
I .1 7 All construction shall cOl1forlTI to the requirements of the .A111ericans
with Disabilities Act.
1.18 Trash enclosures shalllneet the requirelnents of the Sa11itary Service
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 16
coo .
COlnpany's guidelil1es for locatiol1 and size.
1.1 9 Applicant's (or successor's) failure to cOlnply with any of the terlTIS of
approval of the conditional use perluit shall be cause for revocation of
the conditional use permit.
1.20 Conditions specified in the annexation and zoning application (AZ-O 1-
007) sllall also apply.
Adopt the Reconl1nendatiollS of the N ampa & Meridial1 Irrigation District as
follows:
1.21 A Land Use Change/Site Developl11ent application s11all be filed for the
COl1ditional use perl11it.
Adopt the Meridian Fire Departluel1t's Recomlnendations as follows:
1.22 All codes, il1cluding fire hydra11ts, water and fire sprinl<.1er systelTIS shall
be Inet alld approved by all City departlnents.
Adopt the Central District Health Departlnent ReCOll1lnendations as follows:
1.23 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be
sublnitted to al1d approved by the Idallo Departlnent of Health &
Welfare, Division of Environl11ental Quality.
1.24 Run-off is not to create a lTIosquito breeding problem.
1 ~25 Storlnwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discllarge
to the subsurface to preve11t ilnpact to grollndwater and sllrface water
quality; or if other means of pretreatlnent of stormwater discharge is
provided, then Applical1t shall furnish to the Public Worl<s Department
a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintena"nce Manual, inclllding a
scl1edule of regular Inaintenance for the drains. A COffilnitlnent shall be
required that in the event the drains do not effectively worlc, either
through problems with desigl1 or Inaintellallce, developlnent of new
plans for a lneans to prevent the storlTIWater disc11arge shall be required.
AdditionallY1 the Applicant shall cOlnply with the following requirelnel1ts by
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 17
(.
c........ .
action of the City Council at their JUlle 5,2001, Ineeti11g as follows:
1.26 The project shall be treated as a Planned Development with a Mixed
Use~
1.27 The hours of operation shall be as follows:
C-Store: 6 am until midnight ("possibly 5 alu")
Artic Circle: llntillO pIn Sunday - Thursday and II pm Friday and
Saturday
Fuel pumps: 24 hours-credit card sales
Car wash: the hOllrs shall be lilnited so that noise from the car wash
shall not constitute a nuisance to any of the adjacent neighbors.
1.28 The Applicant shall comply with the Ada COUllty Highway District's
recoffilnendations in their letter dated April 18, 200 I, including both
Site Specific Requirelnents and Stal1dard Requirelnents. Additionally, if
ACHD amend their recoll11nendations, tllen the Applicant shall be
required to cOlnply with any alne11dmellts thereto.
2. The conditions sllall be reviewable by tIle Council pursuant to Meridia11
City Code 9 11M17-9.
3. The above conditio11S are concluded to be reasonable and the applicallt
sl1alllneet such requirell1ents as a COl1dition of approval of the application for a
COllditiol1alllse pertuit.
4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit
in accordance witll this Decision, which sIlall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerl<
and then a copy served by the CierI, UpOll the applicant, the Planning and Zoning
Departtnent, the Public Worl<s Department and any affected party requesting notice.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 18
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please ta!(e notice that this is a final actio11 of the governing body of the City
of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code 9 6 7 -65 21 an affected person being a person
who has an il1terest in real property Wl1ich Inay be adversely affected by tIle issuance
or denial of the conditional use perInit approvallnay within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of tllis decision alld order seel( a judicial review as provided by Chapter
521 Title 67, Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I q~
day of J~ ,2001.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON
VOTED
COUNCILMAN lCEITH BIRD
VOTED
tIG-
COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD
VOTED
. p,-,
COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS
VOTED
MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAICER) VOTED
DATED: 6--/ 9 -tJ) /
-
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 19
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public W orl<s
Departlnent and the City Attorney.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT M 20
("""".. "
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 06/05/0 I
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A )
COMMERCIAL )
DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING )
FUELING STATIONS, DRIVE- )
THRU, COFFEE SHOP, CAR )
WASH AND RETAIL IN )
PROPOSED C-C ZONE, )
LOCATED AT 119 S. LINDER )
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
VAN HEES PROPERTIES, )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-O 1-0 11
ORDER GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I. This lnatter coming before tIle City Council on the 19th day of June,
200 I, tInder the provisio11S of Meridian City Code 9 11-17 -4 for final actiol1 on
conditional use pertuit application and tIle COUI1Cil having received al1d approvil1g tIle
ReCOlTIlnendatioll of the Planni11g and Z011i11g COlnlnissio11 the Council talces tIle
following action:
2. That the above nall1ed applical1t is granted a conditiol1al use permit for
a cOlnl11ercial developlnel1t consistil1g of fllelil1g statiol1S, drive-thru, coffee shop, car
wash and retail 11 C-G zone located at 119 S. Lil1der Road, Meridian, Idaho1 subject
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-Ol-OII)
- I
(r...
to the following COl1ditiol1S of use and developlnent:
Adopt the RecolnmelldatiollS of the Plallnillg al1d Zoning and Engil1eeril1g staff
as follows:
2.1 A IninimUlTI 8-foot-wide landscaping buffer shall be installed along the
entire le11gth of the southern property line as required by the Landscape
Ordinance for a buffer between the residelltial and cOlnmercial uses.
2.2 A tWO-il1Ch caliper tree sllall be illstalled in this area for every 35 linear
feet of landscape buffer.
2.3 All eigllt-foot-talllnasol1ry fence sllall be located along the entire lengtll
of the southerl1 property line to help shield the residents froIn noise,
and shall be continuOllsly maintained in good repair, and the fence shall
be COllstructed prior to issual1ce of building permits~ Additionally, the
location of tIle fence in relatiol1 to the existing trees is to be worl<ed out
between the affected property 0W11ers and approved by Planning al1d
ZOlli11g staff.
2.4 Lal1dscaping along Franl<.lin and Linder Road shall be installed as
sublnitted, witll the addition of at least tl1ree more two-inch caliper
trees; two on Fra111<li11 Road alld one in the center of t11e landscape strip
adjacent to the escape la11e of the restallrant. The purpose of the
additiollal trees is to have 011e tWO-il1Ch caliper tree per 35 li11ear feet of
lal1dscaping along the street and alol1g parl<i.ng areas as required by City
Ordinal1ce.
2.5 The applicant shall apply for a Planned Sign Program in accordance
with the Sign Ordinance~ The type, location and number of signs
requested shall be amended to comply with the Sign Ordinance.
2.6 Additional trash receptacles shall be required adjacent to the llew coffee
l<iosl< for patron refuse.
2.7 Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via exte11siollS froIn
an existing eight-inch dialneter stub from Franldil1 Road. The depth of
this stub lnay or Inay 110t provide service withil1 the City of Meridial1Js
desig11 standards for Inil1ilnUlll cover and pipe slopes to all areas it1 this
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OJ-OIl)
-2
( .
("
proposed developlnent. Alterllately, tl1e applicant Inay want to consider
sewering tllis site to the southwest1 across land under their ownership,
to the stub under Ten Mile Creel(. Applicant shall be responsible to
COl1struct tIle sewer Inaills to and through this proposed development.
Subdivision designer to coordinate Inain sizil1g and routing witll the
Public W orl(s Department. The City is in the process of planning for a
new sanitary sewer relief lnain adjacellt to this parcel on the Lil1der
Road frol1tage~ Routing alig111nent for this Inain has 110t been
established as of t11is date1 and tile City lnay potentially need to acquire
at1 easelnent for the installatioll.
2.8 Water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing Inail1s in
Franl<.lin Road and Linder Road. Applicant shall be responsible to
COllstruct the water lnains to and through this proposed developluel1t
(looped). Subdivision desigtler to coordinate main sizing al1d routing
with the Public W or1(8 Departlnellt. Applical1t shall provide the Public
W orlcs Department with inforlnatiol1 on anticipated fire flow and
domestic water requirelnents for the proposed site. Flow al1d pressure
froln the existil1g maillS shall be lllonitored with tIle Meridian Water
Departrnellt.
2.9 RV Parlcing is shown at tIle 110rtheast corner of the property. The
parl<illg shall be only for short-terlTI parldng for patrons of the
COlTIlnercial establisll1nel1t, and not for overnight use.
2.10 Applicant shall be reqtlired to install alterllative lnethods of car wash
war11i11g systell1S (e.g., interior flashing lig11ts) and spealcer systelns for
drive..thru facilities (e.g., telephone systelTIs) ill lieu of typical noise..
genera ti11g systell1S ~
2.11 Any InodificatiollS to the site plan, includi11g any future developlnent on
Lots 1 and 2, shall require approval as a planned developlnent under the
conditional use process~
2.12 Off-street parl<.ing shall be provided in accordance with Sectio11 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Z011i11g and Developlnent Ordillance and/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements.
2.13 Pavil1g and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-OII)
-3
in Sections 11~13-4.D. and 11-13"4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
and Developlnent Ordil1ance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirelnents.
2.14 A drainage plan desigt1ed by a State of Idallo licensed architect or
e11gil1eer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engilleer
(Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parl<ing areas. StarIn water
treatment and disposallnust be designed in accordance with
Departlnellt of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
StarIn Water Best Mal1agemellt Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian sta11dards and policies. Off-site disposal il1tO a
surface water is prohibited ullless tIle jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving stream provides written authorizatioll prior to
development pla11 approval~ The applical1t is responsible for filing all
necessary applicatio11S with tIle Idaho Departlnellt of Water Resources
regardillg Shallow Injectio11 Wells.
2.15 Outside lighting shall be designed a11d placed in such a manner as to
eliminate glare and illulnination of the adjoining roadways and
properties, in accordance with City Ordinal1ce Section 11-13-4~C.
2.16 All sigllage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section
11-14 of the City Zonil1g and Development Ordinance.
2.17 All constrllctioll shall c011forln to the requirelnents of tIle Atnericans
with Disabilities Act.
2.18 Trash enclosures shalllneet the requirelnellts of t11e Sal1itary Service
COlnpanyJs guidelines for location a11d size.
2~ 19 Applica11tJs (or successor's) failure to cOlnply with any of the terlTIS of
approval of the conditional use perl11it sllall be calIse for revocatiol1 of
the conditional use perlnit.
2.20 Conditions specified in the anl1exation and z011ing applicatioll (AZ-O 1..
007) shall also apply.
Adopt the Recomlnendations of the Nall1pa & Meridia11 Irrigatiol1 District as
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-OII)
-4
('n ..
(': n.. ..
follows:
2.21 A Lalld Use Change/Site Development application shall be filed for the
conditional use permit.
Adopt the Meridian Fire Departlnent's Recollllnendations as follows:
2.22 All codes, including fire llydral1ts, water and fire sprinlder systelTIS shall
be met and approved by all City departluents.
Adopt the Central District Health Departlnellt Recommendations as follows:
2.23 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be
submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &
Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality.
2.24 Run-off is 110t to create a mosquito breeding problem.
2.25 StorlTIWater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge
to tIle subsurface to prevellt ilnpact to groundwater and surface water
quality; or if other Ineans of pretreatlnent of stormwater discharge is
provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public W orl(s Departmellt
a copy of the proposed Operation and Mail1tenal1ce Manual, includillg a
schedule of regular Inaintena11ce for the drains. A commitment shall be
required that in tIle event the drains do not effectively worl<, either
through problelTIS with design or Inaintel1ance, developlnellt of new
pIa.os for a lneans to prevent the storlllwater discharge sllall be required.
Additionally, the Applicant shall cOlnply with the following requirements by
actiol1 of tIle City COU11Cil at t11eir June 5, 2001, lueeting as follows:
2.26 The project shall be treated as a Planl1ed Development with a Mixed
Use.
2.27 TIle hOllrs of operatio11 shall be as follows:
C-Store: 6 alTI untillnidnight ("possibly 5 aln")
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OJ-OIl)
-5
Artie Circle: u11til I 0 pIn Sunday - Tllursday and II pm Friday &
Saturday
Fuel pUlnps: 24 hours-credit card sales
Car wash: the hours sllall be limited so that noise from tIle car wash
shall not constitute a nuisance to al1Y of the adjacent neighbors.
2.28 Tile Applicant shall cOlnply with the Ada County Highway District's
recollll11el1dations ill their letter dated April 18, 200 I, including both
Site Specific Requirements and Stal1dard Requirements. Additio11ally, if
ACHD alnend their recoffilnelldations, then the Applicant shall be
required to cOlnply with any alnendlnents thereto.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the
applicant shalllneet such requirelnents as a C011dition of approval of the application
for a conditiol1al use permit.
4. Notice to Perluit Holder, t11is conditiol1al use perluit is not
trallsferable without con1plyi11g with the provisions of Meridian City Code s 11-17 -8,
a copy of which is attached to tl1is perlnit,
By actioll of tIle City COU11Cil at its regular Ineeting held on the
/ q7!J-
day of
~
) 200 1.
D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI~Oll )
-6
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Departlnent, Public W orl(8
Department and City Attorney.
Dated:
z:\ W ork\lV1Weridi a n\!v1e ri dian 15360M\Harl('s Corner AZ..Q 1-007 CUP-O .1..0 II \OrderCUPO ) ..0 ll.doc
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(CUP-OI-OIl)
- 7
JUN lei ' 111 1r(: 40 FR PUBL I C WORKS
2088871297 TO 8884218
P.02/04
(rtE C E lYE
JUN 1 9 2001
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
j " "
<"
J-U-B ENGINEERS. Inc.
ENG1NEERS · SURVEYORS · PLANNERS
June 18, 2001
A eg ional Office
250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, 10 83709..0944
208~376-7330
Fax: 208-323..9336
RE: Devlin Place Subdivision No.2
Final Plat Review
Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer
City of Meridian Public Works
660 E. Watertower, 2nd Floor
Meridian J 10 83642
Submitted via Fax No. 887-1297 and mail
Dear Mr. Freckleton:
We are in recelpt of your plat review comments dated June 15) 2001, and will revise the final
plat accordingly. The following is written comment on the items within your review letter:
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1.. The applicant, D. W.., Inc. will meet all terms of the approved preliminary pLat and
development agreemen to'
2. The appUcant wiLL make payment of water assessment fees for the common areas as
requlred prior to City signatures on the final plat map. We hereby request that the
City provide the fee amount9
3. Compaction test results will be submitted to the Meridian Bullding Department for
each building lot receiving engineered backfilL by the developer's testing laba
4.. The design of the drainage detention pond provides for a continuous discharge of storm
water through an orifice plat. As suchJ the water within the pond will discharge at a
rate not to exceed the 100-year pre-developed flow as is allowed by the affected
agencies.. The pond is designed to draln the 100-year storm event wlthin three hours..
5. Your comments are 50 noted. Also) a letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of
110% will be provided by the developer for all uncompleted items prior to signature on
the final plat..
6. The developer's landscape architect has been advised of the two...inch tree caliper
size.
7.. The developer will construct sewer and water mains to and through this development.
J-U..B has coordinated the main sizing and routing with the City of Merid1an PubLic
Works Department, and has submitted plans for review..
8. 17 Gary A.. Lee, P..E../L.S., a registered professional engineer within the State of Idaho,
do hereby state that all street finish centerline elevations within Devlin Place
Subdivision No.. 2 are set a minimum of three feet above the hlghest groundwater
elevation as measured bY J-U..B ENGINEERS, Inc. from AUgUst 2000 to October 2000.
*
JUN 18 '01 17:40 FR PUBLIC WORKS
2088871297 TO 8884218
P.03/04
("
Co
~
~J.U.B }
Bruce Freckleton
June 18, 2001
Page 2
Engineers Surveyors Planners
9. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrlctions for Devlin Place Subdivision No.2 have
been submitted to the City for review~
1 o. The notes on the final pLat have been revised..
11" The Nampa 8: Meridian Jrrlgation District License Agreement addresSlng the terms and
conditions of encroachments upon the Rutledge Lateral easement have been identified
on the plat. Also, a copy of the executed agreement will be forwarded to the City
once received.
12. A fencing plan has been shown on the Devlin Place Subdivision No.2 improvement
plans and a note has been placed on the plat that restricts the fence height to a
maximum of four feet along the common boundaries of Lots 4 and 5, Block 5; and Lots
5 and 6, Block 5.
13. Per your suggestion, no trees will be planted along the micro path situated in Lot 5 of
Block 5.
14. The future Devlin Place Subdivision No~ 2 Homeownerls Association will be responsible
to ensure that any branches, which extend over the sidewalk adjacent to Lot 13, BLock
1, are pruned to a minimum height of eight (8) feet above the sidewalk surface, per
City Ordinance.
15.. The street name f'N.. Man O' War Court" has been revised to read uN. Man 0' War
Place rr ..
14. Your comment is noted.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The Rutledge lateral was tiled this spring in accordance with plans that were approved
by Nampa &. Meridian Irrigation District. This is the only adjacent irrigation or waste
ditch next to the site.
2. There are no known domestic wells or septic systems on this site-
3. A street lighting plan will be submitted by the developer to the City and a street
lighting permit wiLL be obtained.
4.. A rrFinaL" letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the
subdivlslon and street names, will be submitted to the City once receivedll We have
assumed that the City Staff has submitted a copy of the final plat to the Ada County
Street Name Committee for review; if not, please do so. If any street names change,
we will make any corrections necessary to conform.
5. Fire hydrant pl~cements have been identified upon the improvement plans as
submitted to the City of Meridian.s Public Works Department.. We have assumed that
the Staff has submitted these plans to the water superintendent for review_
*
JUN 18 '01 17:40 FR PUBLIC WORKS
2088871297 TO 8884218
P.04/04
,
(
~..
~J.U~B~
Bruce Freckleton
June 1Bl 2001
Page 3
Engineers Surveyors Planners
6. Five...foot..wide sidewalks have been shown throughout the development in accordance
with City Ordinance, except for the west side of N.. Haven Cove Way, WhlCh will be
reserved for a landscaped buffer next to Lot 20 of Block 2) which will be landscaped..
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
J-U..B ENGINEERS) Inc.
Gary A. Lee, P.. E../L.S.
Project Manager
GAL:lhc
cc: Dan Wood, D.W.J Inc.
f :\P roject'ltanagers\GAL \ 11687\adm in\d ty Letter 6..18-01.doc
*
~........ TnT f"'\ I [J A~ C (';\ A w..JI'
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
(... HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY COUNCIL },AErvIBERS
Ron 1\nderson
Keitll Bird
TaDllny deW ccrd
Cherie McCandless
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 · FAX: (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
(208) 884..5533 t FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM:
To:
June 15, 2001
,~ ECEIVE
JUN 1 5 2001
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
Request for a Final Plat Approval of Devlin Place Subdivision No.2 - 16 Single-
family building lots, four other lots on 5..17 acres in an R -4 ZQ.ne by D.. W., Inc.
(File # FP-OI-010)
Mayor & City Council
From:
Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer
Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner ~\:\L
Re:
We bave reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
The subject property has a prior Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Development Agreement (DA)
that affect this application.. The 5.17 acres involved in this applicatio.n is an illegal lot split of a larger
8-acre parcel, originally owned by D.D.. & F. In 1997, a rezone application (R-4 to L-O) and a CUP
(for a 44-unit assisted living facility, 16-unit Alzheimer wing, 10 garden apartments, and a l06-suite
retirement complex) was submitted for the entire 8 acres. A condition of the rezone was for the owner
to enter into a DA with the City of Meridian, which was recorded in April, 1998..
If this application is approved, the existing DA will have to be modified and the existing CUP will
have to be revoked, because both require an assisted living facility and senior housing to be built on
the subject property. (NOTE9. At the June 5, 2001 regular meeting of the meridian City Council,
modifications to the existing DA, and the rezone to R -4 were approved)
LOCATION
The property is generally located on the north side of Cherry Lane, east of Ten Mile Road. It is
designated as Existing Urban in the Comprehensive Plan.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North - Devlin Place Subdivision, zoned R-4.
South - The remnant 2.69-acre parcel, owned by D"D. & F. is immediately south of the subject parcel.
Haven Cove Subdivision, zoned R-4, is across Cherry Lane from the site..
East - Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision, zoned R-4.
West - Sunburst Subdivision, zoned R-4..
F.P..O 1-0 10
DeVlin .Place SUbdiViSion N04 2
/...... .
t,.....
~.f'.~ . .... .
(. ... ...
Mayor and Council
June 13, 2001
Page 2
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat and development agreement.
2. Applicant has indicated previously that the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be an extension. of the existing system owned and maintained by the Narnpa
& Meridian Irrigation District.. Since domestic water is used as a backup source in this
development, co.tnmon areas within this subdivision will be subject to City of Meridian water
assessments. Payment of water assessment fees for the common areas is required prior to city
signatures on the :final plat map.
3" Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for any
building lots receiving engineered backfill.
4. The design of drainage areas shall ensure that water is retained only during 25-year storm
events for a period of time not to exceed 24-hours.
5. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized
irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, perimeter fencing installed,
and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building
permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be
required for all fencing, pathways, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water,
etc., prior to signature on the final plat.
6. All required landscaping trees shall be a minimum of two inches in caliper size.
7. Sanitary sewer and water service to this subdivision will be via existing gravity sewer and
water mains located in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct
mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main
sizing and routing with the Public Works Department"
8. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all
street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three- feet above the highest established
normal groundwater elevation.
9. Proposed restrictive covenants and deed restrictions were submitted with the Preliminary Plat
application for review by the City Attorney's office. The Applicant is proposing the CC&R's
from Devlin Place Subdivision No.1 also apply to this second phase of the subdivision.
1 o. Please add or revise the following plat notes:
(2.) .. "time of re-subdivision. or us allo'y'ly~d by conditional use.
(6.) .. . .highest established seasonal normal groundwater elevation.
(7.) ." ..common lots to be owned and maintained by the....
FP-OI-o10
DeVlin Place SUbdiViSion No~ 2
/"" "
(; ,":".
Mayor and Council
June 13, 2001
Page 3
(11..) ... . hereby reserved over Lot 20, Block 2, and Lot 14, Block 5 for Nampa & Meridian....
(12.) A 10-foot wide permanent Public Utilities, Drainage, an.d Irrigation Easement is
designated to be centered on all interior lot lines, unless dimensioned otherwise.
(13.) The owner of each lot across which passes an irrigation/drainage ditch or pipe, is
responsible for the maintenance thereof, unless such responsibility is assumed by an
irrigation! drainage district..
(14.) All buildable lots are for single family dwellings only. In addition, each single family
dwelling shall be a minimum of 1400 square feet in size, excluding garage area~
11. Provide the Public Works Department with documentation from the Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District that the 20-foot encroachment into the existing 40-foot Rutledge Lateral
Irrigation Easement is approved. Note the encroachment agreement on the final plat. If the
NMID will not allow an encroachment of the entire 20- feet, the east side of the common lot
shall be set at the encroachable line.
12. The developer shall be required to install the micro-path, landscaping, and fencing as per the
approved landscape and fencing plan, with the notes below. The fence height adjacent to the
pathway shall be restricted to a maximum of four (4) feet. A deed restriction shall be created
for the lots adjacent to the micro-path that prevents them from erecting any other fencing
adjacent to the pathway, and a note shall be placed on the plat that reiterates this point.
13. Ordinance 12-13-12.4 requires a minimum of one (1) deciduous tree per 35 linear feet adjacent
to the micropath in Lot 5, Block 5. No trees are shown. However, since this lot also serves as a
sewer easement and trees are prohibited within sewer easements, Staff recommends the
Landscape Plan (Sheet L-I, dated 5-15-01) be approved under the Alternative Compliance
outlet of the ordinance.
14. The Patmore Ash shown at the south boundary of Lot 13, Block 1 is within 5 feet of the sight
triangle. It is approved as shown, but the developer and future Homeowner's Association must
ensure that any branches which extend over the sidewalk are pruned to a minimum height of
eight (8) feet above the sidewalk surface, per Ordinance 12-13-6.5"A.
15. Revise the street name "N. Man 0' War Court" to read ''N. Man 0' War Place" per the
approved Ada County Street Name Committee sheet.
14. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat
does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance~
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 ~ All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing
or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance
12-4-13~ Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or
FP-O I -0 10
DeVlin Place SUbdiviSion NO. 2
("
Mayor and Council
June 13, 2001
Page 4
lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public
Works Department.
2" Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed
from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used
for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. 1 OO-watt~ high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the
Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are
determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light
contractor shall 0 btain an approved design and permit from the Public Works Department prior
to commencing installations.
4. Submit "Final" letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee~ approving the subdivision
and street names.. Make any corrections necessary to conform.
5. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent.
6. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K~
FpMO 1..0 I 0
DeVlin Place Su bdivision Nor 2
{
l...
(
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 06-05-01
IN THE MATTER OF THE REMAND )
TO PLANNING AND ZONING FOR )
THE APPLICATION OF CEDAR SPRINGS)
LOCATED NORTHWEST OF MERIDIAN )
AND USTICI( ROADS )
)
BY: J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. )
)
CASE NO. PP-OQ-018
ORDER OF
REMAND TO
PLANNING AND
ZONING
This lnatter havillg COlne before the City Council on April 17, 200 I a11d
contil1ued until June 5,2001, at the hour of 6;30 o1clocl( p91n9J at the Meridian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, and the COUI1Cil having received the
Recommend.atiol1S froIn Plannillg and Zoni11g, correspondence froIn Berry Peters, J-
U-B Engi11eers, Parl<s alld Recreation COlTIlnissioll alld Staff, Chief Willialn Gordol1,
and Fire Chief I(el111Y Bowers, and additionally having heard testilnony at the JUl1e 5,
20011neeting froIn Shari Stiles, Pla1111ing and Zoning Adlnillistrator, TOlTI I(untz,
Parl<s alld Recreation Director, Fire Chief !(en11Y Bowers, and the testimony fr0111
Matt Schultz al1d Gary Lee both from J-U-B Ellgineers:r and John I(el1nedy, 0W11er of
property adjacel1t to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs, and due to
inconsistencies ill the prelilninary platJ and being ftllly advised in the premises issues
the following Decision and Order~
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING PP-OO-O 18
1
(" ..
i~"-' .... .
t:.:.... ..
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING ORDER OF REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING
Based upon the above and foregoing correspondence, testilTIOny, and
inconsiste11cies in the prelimil1ary plat, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS
DOES ORDER THAT:
1. The decision of the City Council is based tlpOll the grounds there are
inCOl1sistencies in the preliminary plat, alld such plat shall require the followil1g:
1.1 Applicant shall be required to supply access for John !Cellnedy's
property, the l1eighbor to the west, and note said access by the
applicable stub street on the plat.
1 ~2 Applicant shall relTIOVe froIn the plat the future L-Q and multi..falnily
references if they are not il1tended to be planned development.
1 ~3 Applicant shall design a new single loaded street alollg the parl( on the
southerl1 boundary of the proposed subdivision, and additiol1ally it shall
address any safety issues within the plat~
1.4 Applicant shall desigll tile lots to be of various sizes to add diversity
withil1 the subdivision.
1.5 Venerable Lane sllall be vacated. 011 the latest plat, al1d the Plal111il1g al1d
Z011ing COlnrnissiol1 shall address what they wal1t covered a11d what
they want done with this lane.
2. This matter is relnanded bacl< to the Plal1nillg and Z011ing COlTIlnission
for further actiol1 in accordance with this decision~
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING PP-OO-O 18
2
(
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please tal<.e 110tice that this a final action of the governing body of tIle City of
Meridian~ Pursuant to Idaho Code s 6 7 -65 21 all affected perso11 being a persoll who
has an interest i11 real property which Inay be adversely affected by tIle remand of the
prelilnil1ary plat may within twe11ty-eight (28) days after the date of this decisiol1 al1d
order seelc a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
I a~1i
By action of the City COU11Cil at its regular meeting held 011 the -/ --day of
~~
, 200 I.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN ANDERSON
Voted
~
COUNCILMAN BIRD
Voted
COUNCILWOMAN DEWEERD
Voted
COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLESS
Voted
(../
MAYOR ROBERT D~ CORRIE (Tie Breal(er)
DATED: 6--(tf---CJ I
~
Voted
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING PP-OO-OI8
3
Copy served upon Applicant, the Plallning and Zoning Department, Public W orl<s
Departlnent and the City Attorney. <t\,"'iV'~.t~.~~r:II"II/J
~-A...\' ~ O.r ~ifj..!...fl~~_.." I,~~
~..~ ~ .f~ l""J:
~~ ;,.. ;. "\. . -.................. 't-~ ~~
;t:' ,C} oWP.QplA~ .~~ ~,
/ _ / Li __ ,,/ ~ - .. ,.~Ci '1k.~'\. ^~~
Dated: p. I 7" v ~ t~~. ~ t.
ff ~ _ ~
~ g~~ i\ , ft t
- gt~l&WJ t:
-; ~ J~ 9 IE
r; -~. ~~ ~
~ t\t :-~. . t'\ ~
~ ~A_ ;. ~~oI ~~~? /~ ~ tff
:.:~ - ~~ ~;,~ 2~~" f~,~ #
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Cedar Spgs PPOD-OIS Remand PP back to P &z\OrderRelnandingJ% to.~~~~~O~-- i'~ g
o 18. doc ~~:;J;::J~JJi;,rf . \\'$11
ld~1i:::'1J .1~ ~1r\"
BY.
City ClerIc
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING PP-OO-O 18
4
(
(.
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 06-05-01
IN THE MATTER OF THE REMAND )
TO PLANNING AND ZONING FOR )
THE APPLICATION OF CEDAR SPRINGS)
LOCATED NORTHWEST OF MERIDIAN)
AND USTICIC ROADS )
)
BY: J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC~ )
)
CASE NO. AZ-OO-019
ORDER OF
REMAND TO
PLANNING AND
ZONING
This Inatter having COIne before the City COUI1Cil 011 April 17, 200 I and
COl1til1lled tll1til Jllne 5,2001, at the hOllr of 6:30 o'clocl< p.m., at the Meridian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridial1, Idaho, and the Council havil1g received the
ReCOlnme11dations froln Plal111il1g and Zoning, correspondel1ce from Berry Peters, J-
U~B El1gineers, Parl<s and Recreatio11 Commission and Staff;p Chief Willialn Gordon,
al1d Fire Chief I(enl1Y Bowers, and. additionally having heard testilTIOny at the Jlll1e 5,
2001 meeting from Shari Stiles, Plannil1g and Zonil1g Adlninistrator, Torn I(untz,
ParIes and Recreatiol1 Director, Fire Chief !(enl1Y Bowers, and the testimony froIn
Matt Schultz and Gary Lee both frolll J-U-B El1gineers, al1d John !Cenlledy, 0W11er of
property adjacel1t to the 110rthwest corller of the proposed Cedar Springs, al1d due to
the i11consistencies in the correspo11ding prelilnil1ary plat application, Case No. PP-
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING AZ-OO-O 19
1
(,U: ":" :
(/v...
00..0 18, and being fully advised ill tIle prelnises issues the following Decision and
Order.
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING ORDER OF RENlAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING
Based llpOll. tIle above and foregoing corresponde11ce, testilTIOny, al1d
i11COl1sistel1cies i11 the prelilnil1ary plat, Case No. PP-OQ-O 18) IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT:
14 TIle decision of the City COU11Cil is based upon the grounds there are
inconsistellcies in the corresponding prelilninary plat application, Case No. PP-QO-
018 and si11ce that application is being relnanded) this applicatio11 should be
rell1anded as well..
2. This matter is relnanded bacl( to the Planning and Zoning COlnlnission
for further action in accordal1ce with t11is decision.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please talce notice that this a fi11al action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian. Pursua11t to Idaho Code ~ 6 7 -6521 an affected person being a person who
has an interest il1 real property which may be adversely affected by the relnand of the
preliminary plat may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and
order seelc a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING AZ-OO-O 19
2
(
:..
c
By action of the City COUI1Cil at its regular Ineeting held on tIle
;11'1t
~day of
J~
, 200 1.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN ANDERSON
Voted
COUNCILMAN BIRD
Voted
..~
COUNCILWOMAN DEWEERD
Voted
COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLESS
Voted
Uv
~
MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (Tie Brealcer)
DATED: G-(9-0f '
Voted
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
Copy served lIpOl1 Applicallt, tIle Planning alld Zoning Department, Public W orl(s
Department al1d the City Attorney. ~~;11~~111'j'i'i)
,~ '. J:I~);:;,
, Q~ ~ *~ ~~
. ~ ~~
/' la J)J \
Dated: t;/' II~IY I SEAL.~
# ~ ~ i
So ~. ~/'~n ~
~ ~ ~'t 16"1 · ~ ~
~.. ~ . ~~ $
~ .~~ . (i) *.
-ll;;J: ~=f!Ji:~,rr1{ · . \"'~
tr.'f.~~ . ~ k~~"
4~?;JU.i..~ .W':i~~~
Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Cedar Spgs PPOO~018 Remand PP back to P & Z\OrderRemandingAZ to PZ
AZOO-O 19 tdoc
ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO
PLANNING AND ZONING AZ..OO-O 19
3
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF VAN HEES
PROPERTIES, APPLICANT,
AND LARRY VAN HEES,
CAROL VAN HEES SNYDER,
DWIGHT VAN HEES, CORY
SMITH, AND CHRlSTOPHER
SMITH, OWNERS, THE
APPLICATION FOR
ANNEXATION AND ZONING
OF 4 ACRES FOR PROPOSED
HAR1('S CORNER, LOCATED
119 S. LINDER ROAD)
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
c/c 06-05~OI
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. AZ-OI-007
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND
ZONING
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having COll1e on for
ptlblic hearing on JU11e 51 200 I, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., and Shari Stiles, Planning
and Zonillg Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on
behalf of the Applicant were JoAnn Butler and Tom Roaln, al1d the Applicant, LaIl)'
Van Hees, appeared and testifIed, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City
Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(fS CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page I
(
("
mal(es tile follovving Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and
zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weel<s prior to said public hearing
scheduled for June 5,2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing
and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record
within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under
consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of
public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than
one weel, before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to
newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the
Inatter l1aving been duly considered by tIle City Council at the June 5, 20011 public
hearing; and the applicant, affected property ovvners1 and government subdivisions
providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having
been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence.
2. There has been compliance vvit11 all notice and hearing requirements set
forth in Idaho Code ss 67-6509 and 67 -6511, and Meridian City Code ss 11-15 - 5
and 11-16-1.
3. The City Council tal<.es judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY IA.RRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ..OI-007)
Page 2
('..' <
(
development ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, 1vleridian City Code, and all
current zoning maps thereof, and the Compre11ensive Plan of the City of Meridian
adopted December 211 1993, Ordinance No. 629, January 4, 1994, and maps and the
ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary.
4. The property which is the subject of the application for annexation and
zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein as
if set forth in full.
5. The property is approximately 3.667 acres in size and is located at the
SOllthwest corner of Linder Road and Franl<lin Road. The property is designated as
Harl<.' s Corner.
6. The owner of record of the subject property is Larry Van Hees of Boise,
Idaho.
7. Applicant is owner of record.
8. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as R-I, and consists of
non-cultivated agricultural ground.
9. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as C-C.
10. The subject property is bordered to the 110rth by vacant land zoned 1-L,
to the south by agricultural land vvith a single family dwelling zoned R-l Ada County,
and a little further to the south is the Whitestone Subdivision, zoned R-4, to the east
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(JS CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 3
by vacant land zoned C-N, adjacent to Crestwood Estates, zoned R-4, and to the
west by agricultural land zoned RUT by Ada County.
11. The property which is the subject of this applicatiol1 is vvithin the Area
of Impact of the City of Meridian.
12.. The entire parcel of tIle property is included within the Meridian Urban
Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
13. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the follovving
manner: Commercial development including a service station vvith drive-t11rough
restaura11t, and drive-through coffee facility, and a car wash..
14.. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as C~C which
is not consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map
which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. However, the
Comprehensive Plan is under review and consideration is being given to changing
part of this area to Commercial..
15. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that
affect the consideration of this applicatio11.
16.. Giving due consideration to the comnlent received from tIle
governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning
jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 4
(
(:.. .
not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are
imposed, subject to the following:
Adopt the Recolnmendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engil1eering staff
as follows:
16.1 The legal description sublnitted with the application meets the
requirelnents of the City of Meridian and State Tax COlumission and
places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
16.2 Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with
the City as a condition of annexation. The Developme11t Agreement
shall address, among other things, specific landscape/common area
requirements, phasing timefrarnes, any building height limitations,
signage, pathways, lighting and noise, hours of operation, and other
items as required by the Comlnission or Council. If annexed, all future
uses shall be required to be approved through the plallned development
process and as conditional uses.
16.3 .All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural watervvays,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contigtlouS to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordil1ance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the
appropriate irrigatiorl/drainage district) or lateral users association, with
written confirmation of said approval sublnitted to the Ptlblic Worlcs
Department.
16.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systelTIS within this project
shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 a11d 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
16.5 Two-hundred-fifty- and IOO-vvatt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall
be required at locations designated by the Public Worl<.S Department~
.All streetlights shall be installed at the developer's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 5
{/..:
~~\~
./;........ ..... . .
i ~
\..:.:. ,....
16.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to directly or
indirectly illuminate any nearby residential areas and shall be in
accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4~C.. and 12-5-2..M~
16. 7 Off-street parl<ing shall be provided in accordance with tIle City of
Meridian Ordinance 11..13 for use of property 1 or as otherwise approved
through conditional use (more restrictive parl<ing requirements may be
applied).
16~8 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer shall be reqllired and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parl<ing areas. Storm water
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance with
Departmellt of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies.. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prollibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approval~ The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Sllallow Injection Wells.
16.9 All signage in the proposed project shall be i11 accordance with the
standards set forth in Section 11..14 of tIle City of Meridia11 Zoning and
Development Ordil1ance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or
flashing signs shall be permitted.
16.1 0 Provide five-foot-vvide sidevvall<s in accordance with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.1(.
16.11 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
vvith Disabilities Act.
16.12 Underground year..rollnd pressurized irrigation sllall be provided to all
landscape areas on site~ Submit hoole-up and design details based on the
proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary
water supply connection to the Cityfs mains shall not be allowed.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl('S CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
Page 6
(
Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the prilnary source.. If City water is proposed as a secondary source,
developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
16.13 Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Linder Road
abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or
execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first~
16.14 The existillg 36"foot wide driveway 011 Linder Road located at the south
propeny line, approximately 220-feet south of the signalized
intersection at Franldin Road, is approved with this application as a
right-in!right-out driveway~ Construct a median in Linder Road located
50-feet south of the stop bar at Franl<lin Road. and extending 50-feet
south of the southern edge of driveway on Linder Road.
16.15 The applicant shall either utilize the existing 36Mfoot vvide rightNin/right-
out driveway on Franldin Road located a minimum of 220-feet from the
intersection as right~in/right-out, OR construct a 35-foot ,vide full access
driveway on Franldin Road located a minimum of 315-feet from the
intersection.. If the applicant constructs a right-in/right-out driveway,
then the applicant shall install a median in Franldin Road located 50-
feet west of the stop bar at Linder Road, and extending 50-feet west of
tIle western edge of driveway on Franl<.lin Road.
16~ 16 If the applicant chooses to construct a right-in!right-out driveway
located 220-feet west of Linder Road, then a second driveway shall be
constructed located 440-feet west of Linder Road, and located to align
or offset a mininlum of I 50-feet from any existing or proposed
driveways on the north side of Franl<.lin Road (Cafarelli Subdivision -
approved in 2000). If the applicant chooses to construct a full access
driveway located 315-feet west of Linder Road, then a second driveway
shall be constructed located to align or offset a minimum of 1 SO-feet
from any ~xisting or proposed driveways on the north side of Franldin
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 7
\. .
Road (Cafarelli Subdivision - approved in 2000).
16.1 7 Pave the driveways on Franldin Road their full width and at least 30..
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Franldin Road and
install pavement tapers with IS-foot radii abutting the existing roadway
edge.
16.18 Pave the driveway on Linder Road its full width and at least 3D-feet into
the site beyond the edge of pavement of Linder Road vvith IS-foot curb
radii.
16.1 9 Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewallc on Franldin Road abutting
the parcel, where there are not currently improvements.. Extend the
sidewall( from its existing location and alignment~
16.20 All existing/proposed irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the
right-af-way on Linder Road and Franldin Road.
16.21 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages
abutting the site shall be borne by the developer.
16.22 Replace unused curb cuts on Franldin Road vvith standard curb, gutter
and concrete sidewallc to Inatch existing improvements.
16.23 Other than the access points specifically approved vvith this application,
direct lot or parcel access to Linder Road or Franldin Road is prohibited..
16.24 The Applicant shall additionally meet all of ACHD's Standard
Requirements required in tlleir letter dated April 18, 2001.
16.25 Additionally, if ACHD alnends any or all of their recommendations,
then the Applicant shall comply vvith any such amendments.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Nalnpa & Meridian Irrigation District as
follows:
16.26 The District requires a Lalld Use Change/Site Development application
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(7S CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
Page 8
to be filed for the conditional use permit.
17. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements
and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No~ 16, and all
sub-parts, the economic vvelfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers
will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a developrnent agreelnent, a
condition of annexation and zoning designation.
18.. It is also found that the development considerations as referenced in
Finding No.. 16 are reasonable to reqtlire and must be tal(en into account, in order to
assure the proposed development is designed, constructed) operated and maintained
in a manner vvhich is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or
intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use
will not chal1ge the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insllre that the
proposed uses vvill not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future
neighborillg uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed developluent on
potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smo!<.e, fumes, glare and odors.
19~ It is found that the zoning of the subject real property as Community
Business District (C-C) requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer
systems and will be compatible with the ApplicantJs development intentions, and will
not assure that the zoning is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan
Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ~
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FORANNEXA.TION AND ZONING
BY LA.ImY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(JS CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 9
(
(
Residential. However, the Comprehensive Plan is under review a11d consideration
and is being given to changing part of this area to Commercial.
20. The subject annexation request and zoning designation and proposed
development ffill relate and will be compatible to the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City as follows, if the Comprehensive Plan is given to
changing part of this area to Commercial:
20~ 1 The consideration of the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the
requirements of the zoning ordina11ce assure that the processing of such
application is the management of grovvth with the aim to achieve high-
quality development. Enhancement of Meridian's quality of life for all
residents is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan
and the zoning ordinance of the City to all applications such as the
subject application.
20.2 This proposed new grovvth development will finance public service
expansion by the requirement herein that the applicant comply with the
requests sublnitted of the political subdivisions responses within the
Meridian Urban Service Planning Area submitted in the record of this
matter~
20.3 The application is consistent with Meridian's self idelltity.
20.4 The preservation and improvement of the character and quality of
Meridian's man-made ellvironment while maintaining its identity as a
self-sufficient cOffilnunity is achieved by applying the criteria of the
Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject
application..
20.5 Compliance with the requests of the political subdivisiollS providing
services, assures that community services are being provided for existing
and projected needs and that the land use patterns of the City are
balanced to insure that revenues pay for services and that the Urban
Service Planning Area is visually attractive, efficiently managed and
clearly identifiable.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 10
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION.
FOR ANN~"'{ATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl(JS CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
20~6 Compatible and efficient use of land through innovative and functional
site design is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive
Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application.
21. The property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property UpOll written
request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city
boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by
Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Meridian City Code 9 11-16 provides the City may
annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set
forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Council may ta!ce judicial notice of government ordinances, and
policies, and of actual conditions existing witllin tIle City and State.
3~ The City of 1Vleridian has ~\:ercised its authority and responsibility as
provided by uLocal Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,
Idaho Code by the adoption of iCornprehensive Plan, City of Meridia11, adopted
December 21,1993, Grd. No. 629, January 4, 1994.J
4. The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of
Meridian Comprehensive Plan, if changed, and would applicable to this Application:
4~A The Goals of the Comprehensive Plan are set forth at Page 5 and
incl ude:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARlC'S CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
Page II
(
4.1 To preserve Meridian's environmental quality and to mal<e
provisions for and improve the total natural environment
by adopti11g City-vvide and Urban Service Planning Area
policies, which deal with area-specific policies and
programs.
4.2 To ensure that grovvth and development occur in an
orderly fashion in accordance with adopted policies and
procedures governing the use of land, residential
development the provision of services and the distribution
of ne,v housing units within the Urban Service Planning
Area.
4.3 To encourage the l<ind of economic growth and
development which supplies employment and economic
self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces
the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's
ability to finance and implelnent public improvements,
services and its open space character.
4.4 To provide housing opportunities for all economic grollps
within the community.
4.5 To preserve and improve the character and quality of
Meridian's rnan-lnade environment while maintaining its
identity as a self-sufficient community.
4.6 To encourage cultural, educational and recreational
facilities which will fill the needs and preferences of the
citizens of Meridian and to insure that these facilities are
available to all residents of the City.
4.7 To provide community services to fit existing and projected
needs.
4.8 To establish compatible and efficient use of land through
the use of innovative and functional site design.
4.9 To encourage a balance of lalld use patterns to insure that
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF lAW - Page 12
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlU(JS CORNER - (AZ..O 10.007)
revenues pay for services.
4.10 To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually
attractiveJ efficiently managed and clearly identifiable.
4B. The sections of the Comprehensive Plan that most directly apply to the
proposed project are as follows:
Goals of the Comprehensive Plan
Goal 7: To provide cOlnmunity services to fit existing and projected
needs.
Economic Development Chapter
1.2 - . . ..set aside areas wllere cOlnmercial interest and activities are to
dominate.
1.4 - Positive programs should be undertal(en to support existing
commercial areas to ensure their continued vitality. . .
Land Use Chanter
4..3U - Encourage new comnlercial development within under-utilized
existing cOlumercial areas.
4.8U- Encourage cOlnmercial uses.. . ~ to locate in the Old Town district,
business parl<.s, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas,
such as freeway interchanges.
Community Design Chapter
2.2U - Encourage area beautification through uniform sign design that
enhances the community.
4.4U - Encourage landscaped setbacl<s for new development~
5. The zonings of Community Business District (C-C) is defined in the
Zoning Ordina11ce at S 11-7 -2 I as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW..
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN BEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlliC'S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 13
(j' .'.
(.~... .
\,..:. .
(C-C) Conununity Business District: The purpose of the C-C District is to
permit the establishment of general business uses that are of a larger scale than
a neighborhood business, and to encourage the development of modem shopping
centers with adequate off-street parl<.ing facilities, and associated site alnenities
to serve area residents and employees; to prohibit strip commercial development
and encourage the clustering of commercial enterprises. All such districts sllall
have direct access to a transportation arterial and collector and be connected to
the Municipal "vater and sewer systems of the City.
6. By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a
conditional use permit is required for Applicant to constnlct and develop a possible
comlnercial development.
7 . Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City
has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land~ See Burt vs. The City of
Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983).
8.. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian i11cluding, but not limited to: Section 12-2-
4 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13,
which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to
pressurized irrigation systems.
9. The development of the property slla11 be subject to and controlled .by tIle
Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinances of the City of Meridian.
I 0 ~ Section II M 16-4 A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in
part as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF lAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARleJs CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 14
If property is annexed and zoned, the City filay require or permit, as a condition
of the zoning, that an owner or developer mal<e a written commitment concerning
the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or
permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall
tal(e effect upon the adoption of the ordinance annexing and zoning the property,
or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. Unless the commitment is
modified or terminated by the City Council, tlle commitment shall be binding on
the owner of the parcel, each subsequent o\rvner, and each other person acquiring
an interest in the property.. A commitment is binding on the owner of the
property even if it is lllU'eCorded; however, an unrecorded comrnitInent is binding
on subsequent owners and each other person acquiring an interest in the property
only if the subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the
property has actual notice of the commitment..
DECISION AND ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does
hereby Order and this does Order:
1. The applicant's request for a11nexation and zoning of approximately 3.667
acres to Community Business District (C..C) is granted subject to the terms and
conditions of tllis Order hereinafter stated.
2. The application is for annexation and zoning of 3~667 acres~ The legal
description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of
Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No.
158~ The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the
Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686.
3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement that provides in the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARleJS CORNER - (AZ..OI-007)
Page 15
event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be
subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following
conditions of development, subject to the following, to-wit:
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff
as follows:
3~ 1 The legal description submitted with the application meets the
requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and
places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
3.2 Applicant sllall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with
the City as a condition of annexation. The Development Agreement
shall address, among other things, specific lal1dscape/common area
requirements, phasing timeframes, any building height limitations,
signage, pathways, lighting and noise, hours of operation, and other
items as required by the Commission or Council~ If annexed, all future
uses shall be required to be approved through the planned development
process and as conditional uses.
3.3 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worl<s
Department.
3~4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project
shall have to be removed from t11eir domestic service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-donlestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
3.5 Two-hundred-fifty- and IOO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall
be required at locations designated by the Public W orl<.s Department.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ..
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FORANNEXA.TION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARle'S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 16
(
/.~...
( ..
. .
All streetlights shall be installed at the developer's expense~ Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
3.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to directly or
indirectly illuminate any nearby residential areas and shall be in
accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11...13 -4. C. and 12 - 5 - 2.M.
3.7 Off-street parl<ing shall be provided in accordance with the City of
Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for use of property, or as otherwise approved
through conditional use (more restrictive parl<ing requirements may be
applied) .
3~8 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord. 557,10-1-91) for all off-street parl<ing areas~ Storm water
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance with
Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities a11d Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies.. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdictio"n which has authority
over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approvaL T11e applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection W ells~
3.9 All signage in the proposed project sl1all be in accordallce with the
standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or
flashing signs shall be permitted.
3.10 Provide five..foot-vvide sidewall<.s ill accordance with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.I(~
3.11 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act~
3.. 12 Underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF lAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI('5 CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 17
(/"
landscape areas on site~ Submit hool(-up and design details based on the
proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary
""vater supply connection to the City's mains shall not be allowed.
Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source,
developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
COlnmon open area.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
3.13 Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Linder Road
abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or
execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits) 7 whichever occurs first..
3.14 The existing 36-foot wide driveway on Linder Road located at the south
property line, approximately 220-feet south of the signalized
illtersection at Franldin Road, is approved ,vith this application as a
right-in!right..out driveway. Construct a median in Linder Road located
50Hfeet south of the stop bar at Fra11ldin Road. and extending 50-feet
south of the southern edge of driveway on Linder Road..
3.15 TIle applicant shall either utilize the eyjsting 36-foot wide right.in!right-
out drive"vay on Franldin Road located a Ininimum of 220-feet from the
intersection as right-in/right-out, OR construct a 35-foot wide full access
driveway on Franldin Road located a minilnum of 315-feet from the
intersection. If the applicant constructs a right-in!right-out driveway,
then the applicant shall illstall a median in Franl<lin Road located 50-
feet west of the stop bar at Linder Road, and extending 50-feet west of
the western edge of driveway on Franldin Road.
3.16 If the applicant chooses to construct a rightM<in!right..out driveway
located 220-feet west of Linder Road, then a second driveway sllall be
constructed located 440-feet ,vest of Linder Road, and located to align
or offset a minimum of 1 50-feet from any existing or proposed
driveways on the north side of Franldin Road (Cafarelli Subdivision -
approved in 2000)~ If the applicant chooses to construct a full access
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZwOlw007)
Page 18
c
driveway located 315-feet west of Linder Road, then a second drive,vay
shall be constructed located to align or offset a minimum of ISO-feet
from any existing or proposed driveways on the north side of Franldin
Road (Cafarelli Subdivision.. approved in 2000).
3917 Pave the driveways on Franldin Road their full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Franldin Road and
install pavement tapers with IS-foot radii abutting the existing roadway
edge.
3.18 Pave the driveway on Linder Road its full width and at least 30-feet into
the site beyond the edge of pavement of Linder Road with I5-foot curb
radii.
3.19 Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewall( on Franldin Road abutting
the parcel, where there are not currently improvelnents. Extend the
sidewall( from its existing location and alignment.
3.20 All existing/proposed irrigation facilities sllall be relocated outside of the
right..of-way on Linder Road and Franl<lin Road.
3921 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages
abutting the site shall be borne by the developer.
3.22 Replace unused curb cuts on Franldin Road with standard curb, glItter
and concrete sidewallc to lnatch existing improvements.
3 .23 Other than the access points specifically approved vvith this application,
direct lot or parcel access to Linder Road or Franl<.lin Road is prohibited.
3~24 The Applicant shall additionally Ineet all of ACHD's Standard
Requirelnents reqtlired in their letter dated April 18, 2001~
3.25 Additionally, if ACHD amends any or all of their recommendations,
then the Applicant shall comply with any such amendments.
Adopt tIle Recornlnendations of the Narnpa & Meridian Irrigation District as
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 19
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARlC'S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
follows:
3.26 The District requires a Land Use Change/Site Development application
to be filed for the conditional use perrnit~
4. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council
the appropriate ordinance for the anner-xation and zoning designation of the real property
which is the subject of the application to (C-C) Community Business District, and
Meridian City Code 9 11-7-2 I~
5. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of
this Order the engineering staff of the Public Worl<s Department shall prepare the
appropriate mapping changes of the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in
Meridian City Code 9 11..21 M I in accordance with the provisions of the annexation and
zoning ordinance.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please tal<e notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code S 67..6521 an affected person is a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date
of this decision and order seel< a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 20
(
(
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I '1 fl:-- day
of
~
, 200 1.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILlv1AN RON ANDERSON
VOTED
~
COUNCILMAN I<EITH BIRD
VOTED
COUNCILW01v1AN TAMMY deWEERD
VOTED
.t\-..
COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS
VOTED
6V
........-----..
1V1AYOR ROBERT D. CORRlE (TIE BREAI<ER)
DATED: 6-/Vj-&(
VOTED
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
B
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zonil1g Department, Public W or1<s
Department and tIle City Attorney. . ~nU"4ttnrfl"
I . ~ ~
~-~/O~tJ / I. \
Dated: ~l. 7 . I! BE~U, ~
~.~ _~ E
~ 4f1~ .~ ~/ J:) ~I
~ ~ ~ ,.., 1a'1 dE' ~~ .c~
15360M\Hark's Corner ~~~~ ~"~ytt.f
~~fr{ ~ ",~
~.~\~
Page 21
\\NP A _ NTS40 _POOSER VER _ Z\ W ork\1v1\Meridian\lv1eridi an
o 11 \AZFindingsCIsOrder~doc
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
.Al'JD DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY V A1'\J HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlli(JS CORNER - (AZ-OI..007)
(
(........
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF VAN HEES
PROPERTIES, APPLICANT,
AND LARRY VAN HEES,
CAROL VAN HEES SNYDER,
DWIGHT VAN HEES, CORY
SMITH, AND CHRISTOPHER
SMITH, OWNERS, THE
APPLICATION FOR
ANNEXATION AND ZONING
OF 4 ACRES FOR PROPOSED
HARlC'S CORNER, LOCATED
119 S. LINDER ROAD,
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
C/C 06-05-01
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. AZ-OI-007
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND
ZONING
The above entitled annexatioll and zoning application having come on for
public hearing on June 5, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 p.ln., and Shari Stiles, Planl1ing
and Zoni11g Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on
behalf of the Applicant were JoAnn Butler and Tom Roam, and the Applicant, Larry
Van Hees, appeared and testified, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City
Council having duly considered the evidence and tIle record in this matter therefore
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF UW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING .APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARle's CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page I
(
t... .
.\.:...... .'.
mal(es tile following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and
zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weel<s prior to said pu"blic hearil1g
scheduled for June 5, 200 I, before the City Council, the first publication appeari11g
and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record
within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under
consideration more than fifteen (IS) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of
public hearing having been posted tlpOn the property under consideration more than
one weelc before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to
newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the
lnatter l1aving been duly considered by the City Council at tile June 5, 2001, public
hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions
providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having
been given full opportunity to express conlments and submit evidence.
2. There 1138 been compliance "With all notice and hearing requirements set
forth in Idaho Code S9 67-6509 and 67 -6511, and Meridian City Code 99 11-15..5
and 11-16-1.
3. The City Council ta!(es judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARlCfS CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
Page 2
development ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, lvleridian City Code, and all
current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprellensive Plan of the City of Meridian
adopted December 211 I 993, Ordinance No ~ 629, January 4, I 9941 and maps and the
ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary.
4. The property which is the subject of the application for annexation and
zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated l1erein as
if set forth in full.
5. TIle property is approximately 3~667 acres in size and is located at the
southwest corner of Linder Road and Franldin Road. The property is designated as
Harl('s Corner.
6. The owner of record of the subject property is Larry Van Hees of Boise,
Idaho.
7. Applicant is o\vner of record.
8. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as R-I, and consists of
non-cultivated agricultural ground.
9 ~ The Applicant requests the property be zoned as C-C.
lO~ The subject property is bordered to the north by vacant land zoned 1-L,
to the south by agricultural land vvith a single family dwelling zoned R-l Ada County,
and a little further to the south is the Whitestone Subdivision, zoned R-4, to the east
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 3
(
by vacant land zoned C-N, adjacent to Crestwood Estates, zoned R-4, and to the
west by agricultural land zoned RUT by Ada County.
II. The property which is tIle subject of this application is vvithin the Area
of Impact of the City of Meridian.
12~ The entire parcel of tIle property is included "Witllin the Meridian Urban
Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian COlnprehensive Plan.
13. The Applicant proposes to develop tile subject property in the follovving
manner: Commercial development including a service station vvith drive..through
restaurant, and drive-through coffee facility, and a car wash.
14~ The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as ewe which
is not consistent with the Meridian COlnprehensive Plal1 Generalized Land Use Map
which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. However, the
Comprehensive Plan is under review and consideration is being given to changing
part of this area to Commercial.
IS. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that
affect the consideration of this application.
16. Giving due consideration to the comment received froIn tIle
governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning
jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development "Will
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
Page 4
(
(..." "
not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are
imposed, subject to the following:
Adopt the Recolnmendations of the Planning and Z011ing and Engineering staff
as follows:
16~ I The legal description sublnitted vvith the application meets the
requirelnents of the City of Meridian and State T~\: Commission and
places the parcel contiguous to existillg city limits.
16.2 Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement witll
the City as a condition of annexation. The Developme11t Agreement
shall address, among other things, specific landscape/common area
requirements, phasing timefralnes, any building height limitations,
signage, pathways, lightillg and noise, hours of operation, and other
items as required by the COlnlnission or Council~ If annexed, all future
uses shall be required to be approved through the planned development
process and as conditional uses.
16~3 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
intersecting1 crossing or lyillg adjacent and contigtlouS to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by tIle
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, vvith
written confirmation of said approval sublnitted to the Public Worl<s
Department~
16~4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systelns withi11 this project
shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8~ Wells Inay be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
16.5 Two-hundredMfifty- and lOOo-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights sllall
be required at locations designated by the Public Worlcs Departlnent~
All streetlights shall be installed at the developer's expense.. Typical
locations are at street i11tersections and/or fire l1ydrants.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF lA.W -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl('S CORNER - (AZ-Ol..007)
Page 5
{"
~\
16.6 Outside lightil1g shall be designed and placed so as not to directly or
indirectly illuminate any nearby residential areas and shall be in
accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5~2.M.
16. 7 Off-street parl<.ing shall be provided in accordance with the City of
Meridian Ordinance 11..13 for use of property, or as otherwise approved
through conditional use (more restrictive parl<ing requirements may be
applied) .
16.8 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer shall be reqllired and sllall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parlcing areas. Storm water
treatme11t and disposal shall be designed in accordance with
Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to
development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injectio11 Wells.
16. 9 All signage in the proposed project shall be i11 accordance with the
standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance. No temporal)' sigtlage, flags, banners or
flashing signs shall be permitted~
16.10 Provide five-foot-vvide sidevvall<.s in accordallce with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-291(.
16.11 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
vvith Disabilities Act.
1 6 .12 Underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all
landscape areas on site. Submit hool(-up and design details based on the
proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary
water supply connection to the City's mains shall not be allowed.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI('S CORNER - (AZ..OI-007)
Page 6
(
Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source.. If City water is proposed as a secondary source,
developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
16..13 Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Linder Road
abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or
~"Xecution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first..
16..14 The existing 36-foot wide driveway on Linder Road located at the south
property line, approximately 220-feet south of the signalized
intersection at Franldin Road, is approved with this application as a
right-in/right-out driveway. Construct a median in Linder Road located
50-feet south of the stop bar at Franldin Road. and extending 50-feet
south of the southern edge of driveway on Linder Road..
16.15 The applicant shall eitller utilize the existing 36-foot wide right~in/right-
out driveway on Franldin Road located a minimum of 220-feet from the
intersection as right-in/right-out, OR construct a 35-foot "vide full access
driveway on Franldin Road located a lninilnum of 315-feet from the
intersection.. If the applicant constructs a right-in!right...out driveway,
then the applicant shall install a median in Franldin Road located 50-
feet west of the stop bar at Linder Road, and extending 50-feet west of
the western edge of driveway on Franldin Road~
16..16 If the applicant chooses to construct a right-in/right-out driveway
located 220-feet west of Linder Road, then a second driveway shall be
constructed located 440-feet west of Linder Road, and located to align
or offset a minimum of I 50-feet from any existing or proposed
driveways on the north side of Franldil1 Road (Cafarelli Subdivision -
approved in 2000). If the applicant chooses to COl1struct a full access
driveway located 3 1 5 Nfeet west of Linder Road, then a second driveway
shall be constructed located to align or offset a minimum of 150~feet
frOITI any existing or proposed driveways on the north side of Franl<lin
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 7
Road (Cafarelli Subdivision - approved in 2000)~
16~ I 7 Pave the driveways on Franldin Road their full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Franldin Road and
install pavement tapers with IS-foot radii abutting the existing roadway
edge.
16~ 18 Pave the driveway on Linder Road its full width and at least 3D-feet into
the site beyond the edge of pavement of Linder Road with 15"foot curb
radii.
16.19 Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewall< on Franldin Road abutting
the parcel, where there are not ctlrrently improvements. Extend the
sidewall( from its existillg location and alignment..
16..20 All existing/proposed irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of tile
right-oE-way on Linder Road and Franldin Road.
16.21 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages
abutting the site shall be borne by the developer4
16.22 Replace unused curb cuts on Franl<lin Road with standard curb, gutter
and concrete sidewall( to match existing improvements..
16..23 Other thall the access points specifically approved vvith this application,
direct lot or parcel access to Linder Road or Franldin Road is prohibited.
16.24 The Applicant shall additionally meet all of ACHD's Standard
Requiren1ents required in their letter dated April 18, 20014
16~25 AdditionallY7 if ACHD alnends any or all of their recommendations,
then the Applicant shall comply with any such amendments~
Adopt the Recommendations of tIle Nalnpa & Meridian Irrigation District as
follows:
16.26 The District requires a Land Use Change/Site Development application
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY L.ARItY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 8
(........
(... ..
to be filed for the conditional use permit.
17~ It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements
and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No~ 16, and all
sub-parts, the econolnic vvelfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers
will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a
condition of annexation and zoning designation~
18~ It is also found that the development considerations as referenced in
Finding No~ 16 are reasonable to require and lTIUSt be ta!<en into account, in order to
assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained
in a manner vvhich is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or
intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use
will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the
proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future
neighborillg uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on
potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smol<.e, fumes, glare and odors.
19~ It is found that the zoning of the subject real property as Community
Business District (C-C) requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer
systems and will be compatible with the ApplicantJs development intentions, and will
not assure that the zoning is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan
Generalized Land Use Map vvhich designates the subject property as Single Family
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LA.Iill.Y VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlU(JS CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 9
Residential~ However, the Comprehensive Plan is under review and consideration
and is being given to changing part of this area to Commercial.
20~ The subject annexation request and zoning designation and proposed
development will relate and \lViIl be compatible to the goals and policies of the
Comprellensive Plan of the City as follows, if the Comprehensive Plan is given to
changing part of this area to Commercial:
20~ 1 The consideration of the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the
requirements of the zoning ordina11ce assure that the processing of such
application is the management of growth \lVith the aim to achieve high~
quality developlnent. Enhancement of Meridian's quality of life for all
residents is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan
and t11e zoning ordinance of the City to all applications such as the
subject application~
20~2 This proposed new growth development will finance public service
expansion by the requirement herein that the applicant comply \lVith the
requests submitted of the political subdivisions responses vvithin the
Meridian Urban Service Planning Area submitted in the record of this
matter.
20.3 Tile application is consistent \lVith Meridian's self identity.
20~4 The preservation and improvement of the character and quality of
Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a
self-sufficient community is achieved by applying the criteria of the
Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject
application.
20.5 Compliance with the requests of the political subdivisions providing
services, assures that COffilTIUnity services are being provided for existing
and projected needs and that the land use patterns of the City are
balanced to insure that revenues pay for services and that the Urban
Service Planning Area is visually attractive, efficiently managed and
clearly identifiable~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 10
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION"
FORANNEu'CATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl(1S CORNER - (AZ..OI-007)
20..6 Compatible and efficient use of land through innovative and functional
site design is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive
Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application.
21. The property can be physically serviced vvith City water and sewer.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I ~ The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written
request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city
boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by
Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Meridiall City Code 9 11-16 provides the City may
annex real property that is vvithin tIle Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set
forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2~ The Council nlay ta!<e judicial notice of government ordinances, and
policies, and of actual conditions existing within tile City and State.
3~ The City of lVleridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as
provided by ULocal Land Use Planning Act of I 975 " codified at Chapter 65 , Title 67,
Idaho Code by the adoption of ICornprehensive Plan, City of Meridian, adopted
December 21, 1993, Ord~ No. 629, January 4,1994:
4.. The follovving are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of
Meridian Comprehensive Plan1 if changed, and vvould applicable to this Application:
4.A The Goals of the Comprehensive Plan are set forth at Page 5 and
include:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAIU(JS CORNER - (AZ~Ol-007)
Page II
("
~.:
4~ 1 To preselVe Meridian's environmental quality a11d to mal<e
provisions for and improve the total natural environment
by adopting City-vvide and Urban Service Planning Area
policies, which deal vvith area-specific policies and
programs.
4.2 To ensure that growth and development occur in an
orderly fashion in accordance with adopted policies and
procedures governing the use of land, residential
developlnent the provision of services and the distribution
of new housing units within the Urban Service Planning
Area.
4.3 To encourage the land of economic growth and
development which supplies employment and economic
self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces
the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's
ability to finance and implement public improvements,
services and its open space character~
4.4 To provide housing opportunities for all economic groups
within the community.
4.5 To preserve and improve the character and quality of
Meridian's lnan-lnade environment while maintaining its
identity as a self-sufficient community.
4.6 To encourage cultural, educational and recreational
facilities which "viII fill the needs and preferences of the
citizens of Meridian and to insure that these facilities are
available to all residents of the City.
4. 7 To provide community services to fit ~'Xisting and projected
needs.
4.8 To establish compatible and efficient use of land through
the use of innovative and functional site design.
4.9 To encourage a balance of lalld use patterns to insure that
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 12
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlli('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
c...
(.
revenues pay for services.
4.10 To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually
attractive1 efficiently managed and clearly identifiable.
4B. The sections of the Comprehensive Plan that most directly apply to the
proposed project are as follows:
Goals of the Comprehensive Plan
Goal 7: To provide cOlnmUl1ity services to fit existing and projected
needs.
Economic Development Chapter
1.2 - ~ . .set aside areas where cOlnmercial interest and activities are to
dOlninate.
1.4 - Positive programs should be undertal<en to support existing
commercial areas to ensure their continued vitality. . .
Land Use Chanter
4~3U wo Encourage new commercial developmellt vvithin under-utilized
existing COlTIlnercial areas.
4.8U- Encourage commercial uses. . . to locate in the Old ToYVIl district,
business parl<s, shopping centers and near high...intensity activity areas,
such as freeway interchanges.
Community Design Chapter
2.2U - Encourage area beautification through uniform sign design that
enhances the community.
4.4U - Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development.
5~ The zonings of Community Business District (C-C) is defined in the
Zoning Ordinance at S 11-7-2 I as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARlC'S CORNER - (AZ..OI-007)
Page 13
(C-C) Community Business District: The purpose of the C-C District is to
permit the establishment of general business uses that are of a larger scale tllan
a neighborhood business, and to encourage the development of modem shopping
centers with adequate off-street parldng facilities, and associated site amenities
to serve area residents and elnployees; to prohibit strip commercial development
and encourage the clustering of commercial enterprises. All such districts shall
have direct access to a transportation arterial and collector and be connected to
the Municipal water and se~ver systems of the City.
6~ By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a
conditional use permit is required for Applicant to COllStru.ct and develop a possible
commercial development.
7 ~ Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City
has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land4 See Burt vs. The City of
Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983).
8. The development of the annexed landJ if annexed, sl1all meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 12-2-
4 whicI1 pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13,
which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to
pressurized irrigation systems..
9 ~ The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the
Zoning and Subdivision and Developlnent Ordinances of the City of Meridian.
10. Section 11-16-4 A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in
part as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(1S CORNER - (AZ-Ol..007)
Page 14
(
If property is annexed and zoned, the City filay require or permit, as a condition
of the zoning, that an owner or developer mal<e a written commitmellt concerning
the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or
permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada COUllty Recorder and shall
tal(e effect upon the adoption of the ordinance annexing and zoning the property,
or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. Unless the commitment is
modified or terminated by the City Council, tIle commitment shall be binding on
the owner of the parcel, eacll subsequent o\vner, and each other person acquiring
an interest in the property. A commitment is binding on the owner of the
property even if it is unrecorded; hovvever, an unrecorded commitment is binding
on subsequent owners and each other person acquiring an interest in the property
only if the subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest ill the
property has actual notice of the commitment.
DECISION AND ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does
hereby Order and this does Order:
I ~ The applicant's request for ann~"Xation and zoning of approximately 3.667
acres to Community Business District (C-C) is granted subject to the terms and
conditions of tllis Order hereinafter stated.
2. The application is for annexation and zoning of 3.667 acres. The legal
description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Sllrveyor, Licensed by tIle State of
Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No.
158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the
Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686.
3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement that provides in the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY IARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARI(7S CORNER - (AZ-O 1.-007)
Page 15
(
f."~ .
(. .
event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be
subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following
conditions of development1 subject to the following, to-wit:
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff
as follows;
3.1 The legal description submitted with the application meets the
requirements of tIle City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and
places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
3.2 Applicant shall.be required to enter into a Development Agreement vvith
the City as a condition of annexation. The Development Agreement
shall address, among other things, specific landscape/common area
requirements, phasing timeframes, any building height limitations,
signage, pathways, lighting and noise, hours of operation, and other
items as required by the Comlnission or Council. If annexed, all future
uses shall be required to be approved through the planned development
process and as conditional uses.
3.3 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to t11e parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public W orIes
Department.
3.4 Any existing domestic vvells and/or septic systems within this project
shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8~ Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
SUCll as landscape irrigation~
3.5 Two-hundred-fifty- and 1 aD-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall
be required at locatio11S designated by the Public Worl(s Department.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF lAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAR!('S CORNER - (AZ-OI-007)
Page 16
(F.
All streetlights shall be installed at the developer's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
3.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to directly or
indirectly illuminate any nearby residential areas and shall be in
accordance 'With City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C~ and 12-5-2.M~
3~ 7 Off-street parldng shall be provided in accordance 'With the City of
Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for use of propertY1 or as otherwise approved
through conditional use (more restrictive parl<ing requirements lnay be
applied) .
3.8 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer
(Ord~ 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parlcing areas. Storm water
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance with
Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of
Storm Water Best lvlanagement Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties
and City of Meridian standards and policies.. Off-site disposal into a
surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority
over the receiving stream provides 'Written authorization prior to
development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources
regarding Shallow Injection Wells~
3.9 All signage in the proposed project shall be in accordal1ce with the
standards set forth ill Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance.. No temporary signage, flags, banners or
flashing signs shall be perrnitted~
3 ~ 1 0 Provide five-foot-wide sidewall<.s in accordance 'With City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.1(.
3~ II All construction shall confornl to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act..
3~12 Underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING .APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HAlU('S CORNER - (AZ~OI-007)
Page 1 7
\.
landscape areas on site. Submit hoole-up and design details based on tile
proposed landscaping~ Due to the size of landscaped area, primary
vvater supply connection to the CityJs mains shall not be allovved.
Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source,
developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
3.13 Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Linder Road
abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or
execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or
other required permits), whichever occurs first..
3.14 The existing 36-foot wide driveway on Linder Road located at the sOtlth
property line, approxinlately 220-feet south of the signalized
intersection at Franldin Road, is approved with tl1is application as a
right-in/right-out driveway~ Construct a median in Linder Road located
50-feet south of the stop bar at Fral1ldin Road. and extending 50-feet
south of the southern edge of driveway on Linder Road..
3.15 The applicant shall either utilize the eyjsting 36-foot vvide right-in/right-
out drive"vay on Franldin Road located a Ininimum of 220-feet from the
intersection as right-in/right-out, OR construct a 3S-foot vvide full access
driveway on Franldin Road located a nlinimunl of 315-feet from the
intersection. If tIle applicant constructs a right-in/right-out driveway,
then the applicant shall install a median in Franldin Road located 50-
feet west of the stop bar at Linder Road, and extending 50-feet west of
the western edge of driveway on Franl<lin Road.
3.16 If the applicant chooses to construct a right-in/right-out driveway
located 220-feet vvest of Linder Road, then a second driveway sllall be
constructed located 440-feet "vest of Linder Road, and located to align
or offset a minimum of I 50-feet from any existing or proposed
driveways on the north side of Franldin Road (Cafarelli Subdivision -
approved in 2000). If the applicant chooses to construct a full access
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING .A.PPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl('S CORNER - (AZ-O I wOO?)
Page 18
(::....
(.:.
drivevvay located 315-feet west of Linder Road, then a second drive'\rvay
shall be constructed located to align or offset a minimum of ISO-feet
from any existing or proposed driveways on the north side of Franldin
Road (Cafarelli Subdivision.. approved ill 2000)~
3.17 Pave the driveways on Franl<lin Road their full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Franldin Road and
install pavement tapers with IS-foot radii abutting the existing roadway
edge.
3.18 Pave the driveway on Linder Road its full width and at least 30-feet into
the site beyond the edge of pavement of Linder Road with IS-foot curb
radii.
3.19 Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewallc on Franldin Road abutting
the parcel, where there are not currently improvelnents~ Extend the
sidewall< from its existing location and alignment~
3~20 All existing/proposed irrigation facilities shall be relocated olltside of the
right-of-way on Linder Road and Franldin Road~
3 ~21 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages
abutting the site shall be borne by the developer.
3..22 Replace unused curb cuts on Franldin Road with standard curb, gutter
and concrete sidewall< to match existing ilnprovements ~
3.23 Other than the access points specifically approved wit11 this application,
direct lot or parcel access to Linder Road or Franl<lin Road is prohibited.
3.24 The Applicant shall additionally lueet all of ACHD's Standard
Requirements reqtlired in their letter dated April 18, 200 I ~
3.25 Additionally, if ACHD alnends any or all of their recommendations,
then the Applicant shall comply with any such amendlnents~
Adopt tile Recommendations of the N ampa & Meridian Irrigation District as
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 19
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl('S CORNER - (AZ-O I ~007)
(.
(....., ..
follows:
3.26 The District requires a Land Use Cl1ange/Site Development application
to be filed for the conditional use permit.
4. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council
the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation of the real property
which is the subject of the application to (C-C) Community Business District, and
Meridian City Code s 11-7 -2 I.
5. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of
this Order the engineering staff of the Public W orl<s Department shall prepare the
appropriate Inapping changes of the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in
Meridian City Code S 11- 21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the annexation and
zoning ordinance.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please ta]ce notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code 9 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has
an interest in real property Wllich may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date
of this decision and order seel( a judicial review as provided by Chapter 521 Title 67,
Idaho Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARl(JS CORNER - (AZ-.O 1-007)
Page 20
(
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I f I!::- day
of
~~
, 200 I.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON
VOTED
.~
COUNCILlvIAN lCEITH BIRD
VOTED
b\..-
COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD
VOTED
f-c...
COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS
VOTED
~
MAYOR ROBERT D~ CORRIE (TIE BREAlCER)
DATED: 6 -I q-6J I
VOTED
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
B
Dated:
..
....
..
\\NP A _ NTS40 _POOSER VER _ Z\ W ork\M\rvleridjan\Meridi an
o 11 \AZFindingsClsOrder .doc
15360 M\Hari('s
Corner
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING
BY LARRY VAN HEES FOR PROPOSED
HARlC'S CORNER - (AZ-O 1-007)
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 05-01-01
Revised 06/22/0 I
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED )
DEVELOPMENT TO INCLUDE )
OFFICE, RETAIL AND )
INDUSTRIAL USES FOR THE )
PROPOSED TREASURE )
VALLEY TECHNICAL CENTER, )
IN AN I-L ZONE, LOCATED )
ADJACENT TO 1-84, )
NORTH~STOFTHE )
INTERSECTION OF )
STODDARD AND OVERLAND )
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
MERIDIAN FREEWAY )
ASSOCIATES/DBSI )
INDUSTRIAL LIMITED )
PARTNERSHIP, )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-O 1-009
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
TIle above entitled conditional use pertuit application havil1g COIne
before the City Cou11cil on May 11 2001, at tIle hour of 6:30 p~ln~, at Meridian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridial1, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Z011ing
Adlnil1istrator, appeared and testified, al1d appearing on behalf of the Applical1t was
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I
(.
Tim Terry, a11d no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly
C011sidered the evidence and the record in this lnatter and the Recolnrnendations to
City Council issued by the Planni11g and ZOllillg COllllnission who conducted a public
hearing alld tIle Council havil1g heard and ta!cen oral and written testimony, and
havil1g duly COl1sidered the lnatter, the City Council hereby Ina!ces tIle following
Fil1dings of Fact, Conclusiol1S of Law and Decisioll alld Order to-wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I ~ A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use perInit was published
for two (2) conseCtltive weel(s prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May I,
2001, before the City COtlncil, the first ptlblication ap.pearing and written notice
having been mailed to property 0W11ers or purchasers of record within three hundred
feet (300J) of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than
fifteell (15) days prior to said l1earing and witll the notice of public hearing havillg
been posted llp011 tIle property under consideratiol1 lTIOre thal1 011e weel( before said
hearing and the copies of allllotices were made available to newspaper, radio and
television stations as public setvice a1111oul1celnellts; alld the lnatter havil1g been duly
considered by the City COtlncil at tIle May I, 200 I, public hearil1g; and the
applicant, affected property owners, and governlnent subdivisions providing selVices
withil1 the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridiall, havil1g been given full
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2
(.:
(0" ..
opportunity to express COlnmel1ts and sublnit evidellce.
2. There has beel1 compliance with all notice and hearing requirelnents set
forth in Idaho Code s67-6509, 6512, and Meridia11 City Code ss 11-15-5 and 11-17-
5 as evidenced by the Mfidavit of Mailing1 and the Mfidavit of Publication alld Proof
of Posting filed witll tIle staff report.
3 ~ This proposed developlnent request is ill an I - L ZOlle and by reason of
the provisions of the Meridian City Code 9 11-1 7 -4, a public hearing was required
before the City COUI1Cil on this application.
4. TIle property is located adjace11t to 1-84, northwest of the i11tersection of
Stoddard and Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho.
5. The owner of record of the subject property is Meridian Freeway
Associates/DBSI 111dustrial Lilnited Partllership of Meridiall, Idallo.
6. Applical1t is owner of record.
7. Tile Stlbject property is currel1tly zoned I-L~ The zonil1g district of I..L is
defined within the City of Meridian Z01ling and Developlnent Ordinance, Section
11-7-2.
8. TIle proposed application requests a conditional use perlnit for Plallned
Development to include office, retail alld industrial for proposed Treasure Valley
Technical Center. The I-L zonillg desigtlation within the City of Meridial1 Zoning
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 3
and Developlnent Ordinance requires a conditionalllse permit be obtained for lnost
uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and
Developlnent Ordinance, Sectio11 11-8-1).
9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is
il1 cOlnpliallce vvith the Meridia11 COlnprehensive Plan.
10. The use proposed witllin the subject applicatiol1 "Will ill fact, C011stitute a
conditional use as deterlnined by City Ordinal1ce.
II. The Meridian City COUI1Cil tal(es judicial notice of its Zoning,
Subdivisiol1 and Development Ordinances codified at Titles II and 12, Meridian
City Code and all current zoning Inaps tllereof and the COlnprehensive Plan of the
City of Meridian, and Maps alld the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area
Boundary .
12. Giving due COl1sideration to the COlnlnent received froIn the
governlnel1tal subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridia11 plan11ing
jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed. developlnent will
not ilnpose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are
imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the
proposed use and developlnent upon services delivered by political subdivisions
providing services to the subject real property "Within the planning jurisdiction of the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT M 4
City of Meridial1 subject to the followi11g:
Adopt the ReCOlTIIUendations of the Planning and Zoning and El1gineering
Staff as follows:
12.1 Off-street parlcing shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridiall Zoning and Developtnent Ordil1ance a11d/or as
detailed in site-specific requirements~
12.2 Paving al1d striping shall be in accordance witl1 the standards set forth
in Sections 11-13-4.D~ and 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridial1 Zonil1g
and Developlnent Ordinance and in accordance with Americans witll
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirelne11ts.
12.3 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or
engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engil1eer per
City Ordinance 11-13 -4. B .4 for all off-street parl<il1g areas. All site
drainage shall be COl1tained alld disposed of on-site.
12.4 Outside lighting shall be desigtled al1d placed so as to not direct
illulnination 011 any l1earby residential areas and il1 accordance with
City Ordinance Section II ~ 13-4. C.
12.5 Any existing dOluestic wells and/or septic systellls within this project
shallllave to be removed froIn their dOlnestic selVice per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 . Wells Inay be used for 11on-dolnestic purposes
suc11 as lal1dscape irrigation.
12~6 All irrigation ditches7 laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
il1tersecting, crossing or lying adjacel1t and contiguous to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by tIle
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written confirlnation of said approval sublnitted to the Public W orIes
Departlnel1t.
12.7 Provide landscapillg in accordance with the Lal1dscaping Ordinallce,
Title 121 Chapter 13.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 5
//"
(:
(.
12~8 All trash and/or garbage collectiol1 areas shall be enclosed 011 at least
three (3) sides in accordance with City Ordil1al1ce Section 11-12-1.C~
The applicant shall coordinate trash enclosure locations and
construction requiremel1ts with Sanitary Service Company (SSe) and
provide a letter of approval or plans stalnped by sse to the Plallning &
Zonillg Departmel1t when applying for a Certificate of Zoning
COlnpliallce.
12~ 9 Provide five-foot-wide sidewallcs in accordance with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.1(.
12.10 All sigtlage shall be il1 accordance with the stand-ards set forth in Title
11, Cllapter 14 of the City Zoning and Developlne11t Ordinance.
12.11 All constructiol1 shall conforl11 to tIle requirelnents of the Atnericans
with Disabilities Act.
12.12 TIle e11tire site is located within tIle I-L Zone;, and tIle following uses
shall be limited tlSes in the I-L Z011e witll a conditiol1al use permit;r along
with any of the allowed I-L uses, as part of the Planned Development:
1 ~ Daycare center
2 ~ Professional and sales offices
3. COll1munity and l1eighbor11ood Sllopping center
*The Meridial1 City Code allows for modifications of district
regulations, including such exceptions pertainil1g to the district
regulations governing use (12-6-5), when the Inodification is desirable to
achieve the objectives of the Planl1ed Development.
12.13 Prior to construction of the Western Electrollics btlilding:r an agreelnent
was made with ACHD concerllillg the acquisitioll of tIle right-of-way on
Overland Road~ No right-of -way was acquired for the i11stallation of
curb, gutter or sidewall, along Overlal1d Road al1d, as depicted on the
submitted site plan, there is currently 110 curb or gutter.. A five-foot-wide
detached sidewall< has been installed along Overland in front of tIle
Western Electronics development as agreed to by the Developer alld
ACHD~ The right-af-way acqtlisition on Overland for the Western
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6
(~..,.. . . .
(~m.. .
Electronics developlnent has been deferred until an improvement project
is in design. There is no current ilnprovelnent project in design at this
tilne to improve Overla11d Road west of Stoddard Road~ The Applicallt
shall illstall a five-foot-wide detached sidewall< along the full length of
the planlled developlnent, adjacent to Overland Road in line with the
existing sidewallc, and the Applicant shall provide documentation from
ACHD addressing the resolution of tIle right-of...way issues prior to
issuance of a buildillg pertuit.
12.14 The existing Westerll Electro11ics facility is served by a privately o"Wl1ed
alld maintained sewage lift station that discharges to a City of Meridial1
sewer Inain in Overland Road.. The recel1tly approved Bear Creel( Estates
Subdivision discharges to the same manhole. Because Bear Creel(
Estates was approved prior to the Western Electronics facilitY1 only the
projected excess capacity in the receiving sewer is available for the
Western Electro11icsff.V. Tecl1nical Cel1ter project~ Computer model
calculations show that the Western Electronics lift station is lilnited to a
peale flow of 80 gallons per millute. The project shall continue to be
served by the existing private lift station and pressure Inain until such
tilue as the Blacl( Cat Tru111c is available to serve tllis area. The lift
station Inay not discharge a flow greater tllan 80 gallons per Ininute at
any time~ Provision shall be lnade in the sanitary sewer system such that
the lift station can be abandoned and the site sewer system connected to
the Blaclc Cat Trunlc Sewer, or a lateral thereof, when it is available.
"A vailableu sllall be defined as the tilne when the sewer is extellded
through adjacent property to the westerl1 boundary of this project~ This
project shall include relocation of tIle lift statioll to the 110rthwest corl1er
or installatiol1 of dry-line sewer to the 110rthwest corner with this
project. The applicant shall be respollsible for the eventual connection
to tIle Blacl< Cat Trunl( Sewer~ The City Council requires the applical1t
pay frBlacl< Cat Trunl< Sewer" fees at the tilne of building permit
issuance. These fees are estilnated at $1500 per eqllivalent residential
unit (ERU) al1d shall contribute to the eventual constructioll of the
Blacl< Cat Trulll< Sewer into which this project is desigt1ated to sewer.
12.15 The City of Meridian is ill t11e process of drilling a new dOlnestic well
witllin the Bear Creel< Estates Stlbdivision to provide service to this
area~ Prelilninary fire flow delnand estilnates by the Meridian Fire
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 7
/"
Departmel1t for this application indicate that up to 2,300 gpIn flow
could be required. Ul1til the well is drilled and developed, its output
rate is unl<nown. Additional development within this project shall only
proceed to the exte11t that the particular building, or phase, has an
adequate supply of both dOlnestic and fire protection water, as may be
deterlnined by the City of Meridian Public W orl<s Departlnent1 and tIle
Meridial1 Fire Department~
12~ 16 A site report establishing the highest seaSOl1al groundwater elevatiol1
sllall be sllblnitted to the Public W orl<s Department as part of the
constructioll plan approval process within tIle Plal1ned. Developlne11t~
12.17 Conceptual engilleering plans, including profiles:r shall be sublnitted to
the Public Worl<s Departlnent prior to the City Council heari11g of tllis
application.
12.18 Conditions ftln with the land: Any conditiollS attached to a final
development plal1 shall rUll with the land and shallllot lapse or be
waived as the result of any subsequent change in the tenancy or
ownership of any or all said lands. Such conditions shall be deelned as
requirelnel1ts for the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any use
or struc.ture~
12.19 Design Review: All pla11ned developments are subject to design review
by the City staff and COUI1Cil (12-6-7H). All buildings, other tllan those
buildil1gS constructed of lilce lnaterial and design as sublnitted, shall be
subject to further desigtl review by the COtlncil and Staff prior to
construction.
12.20 TIle Applical1t sllall sublnit plans to the City Planning and Zoning
Director for approval of a comprehensive planned sign prograln in
accordance with Sectioll 11-14-9(E) of the Sign Ordinance~ The design
of the signs included within the sign program shall incorporate
111aterials, colors, and sllall be reflective of a common theIne tllat
incorporates silnilar design elelne11ts in terms of l11aterials, letter styles,
sign type and sign shape~
12 .21 All utilities, il1Cl uding water, sani tal)' and storln sewers , electricity, gas
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 8
c
/
l
\~..... ..
a11d telephone lines shall be installed underground ill either the public
right of way or utility easements. The desigll for adequate storm sewer
facilities shall be provided to the City Engineer and ACHD for review
prior to construction.
12.22 A copy of the bylaws or other deed restrictions which provide for the
Inaintenance and control of all the open space and COlTIlnOl1 area shall
be provided to the Council for review prior to approval.
12.23 All required perilueter landscaping buffers (along Overland Road and 1-
84) shall be i11stalled prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for
any newly constructed building within the planned development. All
interior lalldscaping shall be installed pursuant to the Landscaping
Ordinance as additional buildings are constructed within the planned
development.
12.24 Only minor changes shall be Inade in the location, siting, and height of
the proposed buildings, as authorized by the Building Official or as
required by engineering or other unforeseen CirCUlTIstallces. Additionally,
110 such Ininor changes shall increase the volulne of any building or
structure by lnore than I 0 percent (12-6-6F). *The Applicant has
requested that the sublnitted site plall be considered c011ceptual ill
l1ature, meaning applica11t does 110t want to be limited to tile number,
size, design or location of buildings, parlcing lots or landscapil1g. The
Applical1t has stated that the developmellt sllall be drivell by marl<et
delnal1d. Approvil1g a Conditional Use Pertuit for a planned
developlnent witll nothing lTIDre tha11 a conceptual site plan to be driven
by Inarl<et delnand allows the developer to do essentially whatever tlley
would lil<e to do in the future without further approvals froln the
Council or Commission~ Conditions are placed upon the applical1t to
obtain a Conditional Use Permit for each building within the planned
developlnent, illtended for office, retail, or day care use..
12.25 A recorded subdivision shall be required for any dedication of public
right-of-way (with the exception of dedicatioll on Overland Road, the
widening of which is in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive
Plan.), or t11e reconfiguratioll of existing parcels.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 9
/........ .
t
(...... ...:~
12.26 The City Council mal(es it clear that this is actually, as presented, a
conceptual plan for a COllditional Use Permit. The developer s11all be
required to returl1 to tIle Commission alld City Council for approval
through the conditional use permit process of all offices, retail or day
care uses in the I-L zone.
Adopt the Central District Health DepartmentJs Recomlnendations as follows:
12.27 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be
submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &
Welfare, Division of Environlnental Quality.
12.28 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
12.29 StorlTIWater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge
to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater alld surface water
qtlality, or if other Ineans of pretreatment of storm water discharge is
provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public W orl(s Departlnent
a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a
schedule of regular Inaintel1al1ce for the drains. A cOlnmitment shall be
required that in the event the drains do not effectively wor!c, either
through problelTIS with design or rnaintel1ance, developlnent of new
plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be
required.
12.30 The Engineers and architects i11volved witl1 the desigl1 of the subject
project shall obtail1 current best Inanagemel1t practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater managelnent systeln that prevents
groundwater and surface water degradation.
Adopt the ReCOlTIlnelldations of the Meridian Fire Departlnent as follows:
12.31 Applicants shall satisfy all fire code requirelnel1ts including those
pertaining to water flow and fire sprinlder systems and hydrants.
Adopt t11e Recolll1nendations of the Ada COUl1ty Highway District as follows:
12.32 Applicant shall comply witll ACHD's letters dated April 2, 2001 and
April 4,2001, and any ftlture letter(s) 011 tIle project when thorough
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 10
(
review of the site is cOlnpleted.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigatiol1 District as
follows:
12~33 TIle Narnpa & Meridiall Irrigation District's I(ennedy Lateral courses
along the south and west boundaries of the project. Any encroachlnent
without written approval, plans and a sigt1ed License Agreement are
u11acceptable~ All storm drail1age shall be retained on site.
Adopt the Recolnmendations of the Sanitary SelVice as follows:
12.34 Enclosure sizes shall be reviewed for waste capacity.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Water Department as follows:
12.35 Additional developtnent within this project shall only proceed to the
extent that the particular building, or phase, has an adequate supply of
both domestic and fire protectio11 water, as may be deterlnined by the
City of Meridian Public W orles Departlnent, and the Meridian Fire
Departlnellt.
13. The proposed uses withill the subject application will be harlnonious
with and il1 accordance with the Meridian COlnprellensive Plan and the City of
Meridial1 Z011il1g and Developlnellt Ordina.nce because:
13.1 The stlbject property is desigl1ated on the "Generalized Land Use Map"
as Existing Urbanu.
14. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the
conditions herei11 ordered will be designed1 constructed, operated al1d Inaintained to
be l1arlTIOnious al1d appropriate i11 appeara11ce or intended cllaracter of the general
vicinity and that such uses will110t c11ange the intended essential character of the
saine area.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - II
15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous
or disturbing to existil1g or future neighboring uses.
16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served
adequately by central public facilities and services such as 11igllways, streets, police
and fire protectioll, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
17~ The uses proposed within the subject applicatiol1 will not involve uses,
activities, processes, materials, equipmel1t and conditions of operation that will be
detrilnental to any persol1s, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive
productioll of traffic, noise, slnol(e, fumes, glare or odors.
18. The developluent will not result in the destruction, loss or dalnage of
natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to tIle property~
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I ~ T11e City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the
"Local Land Use Plannil1g Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for COl1vel1ience as the
UActU codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.e. 967-6503).
2. The Meridian City Councilluay exercise all the powers required and
authorized Ul1der the nActn except the power to adopt ordinallces by the
establishlnel1t of a Plan11illg and Zoning COffilnissiol1 by ordinance pursual1t to Idallo
Code Section 67-6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has
established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Z011ing and Developmel1t
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 12
(
(
OrdinanceJJ at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridial1 City Code.
3. AB part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing
and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or COl1ditional
use permits which a proposed use is othelWise prohibited by the terlTIS of the
ordil1allce but allowed with COl1ditions under the specific provisiollS of the ordil1ance
which the City of Meridialll1as done in the adoption of its zoning ordil1ances~
4~ The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts
and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to
grantil1g the salne that the evidential showing supports the finding that tIle following
sta11dards are met and that the proposed development; (Meridian City Code 9 11-17-
3)
a~ Will, in fact;r constitute a conditional use as determil1ed by City policy;
b. Will be harll1onious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive
Plan and this Ordillallce;
c~ Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be
harlTI011ious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of
the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the
same area;
d. Will not be hazardous or disturbil1g to existil1g or future neighboring
uses;
e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such
as highways, streets, police and fire protectiol1, drainage structures, refuse disposal,
water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishluent of proposed
COllditiol1al use sllall be able to provide adequately any such services;
f~ Will not create excessive additional requirelnents at public cost for
public facilities and services and will not be detrilnental to the economic welfare of
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 13
(:~.. ..
(.. .
the COlnlTIUnity;
g~ Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment alld
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or tIle
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, srnol<e, fUlnes, glare
or odors;
h~ Will not result in the destructio11, loss or dalnage of a natural or scenic
feature of Inajor importance~
5~ Prior to granting a COl1ditional use perInit in the Light I11dtlstrial
District (I-L), a public hearing shall be conducted with 110tice to be published and
provided to property owners or purchasers of record within tllree hundred feet (300J)
of the external boul1daries of the land ullder consideration for tIle conditional use
perlllit all in accordal1ce with the provisions of Meridiall City Code S 11-1 7 -5 City of
Meridian Zoning and Developmellt Ordinance, Wllich provides as follows:
"Prior to approving a Conditiol1al Use Permit, the applicant and tIle
COlnmission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided
ill Chapter 15 of tl1is Title. Provided, llowever1 that COl1ditional use
applicatio11s for land in Old Town and in industrial and cOlnmercial districts
shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before
the Pla11ning and Z011i11g Comnlission; and after the recolnmendation of the
COlnmission is made, the application s11all go before the City Council withollt
a public hearing al1d tIle Council may approve, deny, or modify the
reCOlTIlnelldation of the COlnluission. n
6~ Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the COllclusion of
the public l1earillg the COlnlnission shall, translnit its recolnluendations to the
Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The COlnlnissio11 shall reCOlnlnend
that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied~ The
Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.. 14
/<:;.... : .
(...... ..~
('/. . ..
~"<"" ", "
application shall be in accordance with Meridian COlnprehensive Plall, City of
Meridian Zoning and Developmel1t Ordinance, al1d Idaho State law. (Meridian City
Code S 11..1 7 -6 )
7 ~ When the City COtl11Cil approves a conditional use pertuit it may
ilnpose conditions of that approval tllat reasonably:
A. Mil1ilnize adverse ilnpact on other developlnent;
B. Control the sequellce and timing of development;
c. Control the duratiol1 of developluent;
D~ Assure that tIle developlnent is luaintained property;
E. Designate the exact location and nature of the developmellt;
F. Require the provisio11 for OIl-site public facilities or services; and
G~ Require Inore restrictive standards than those generally required, il1 this
Ordina11ce~
8~ The City of Meridian has, by ordillance, established the Ilnpact Area
and the COlnprehellsive Plall of the City of Meridian, which was adopted Decelnber
21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps.
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 15
~\.
hereby ORDER and this does Order that:
I. That the above l1alned applicant is granted a conditional use pertuit for
a planned development to include office, retail, day care and industrial for proposed
Treasure Valley Technical Center in an I-L zone located adjacent to 1-84, 110rthwest
of the il1tersection of Stoddard al1d Overlal1d Road) Meridian, Idaho, subject to the
followil1g COl1ditio11S of use al1d developlnent:
Adopt the Recolnmendations of the Plannil1g and Zoning and Engineering
Staff as follows:
1.1 Off-street parl<ing shall be provided ill accordallce vvith Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Z01ling and Development Ordinance and/or as
detailed in siteHspecific requirelnents.
1.2 Paving and striping shall be in accordance witll the standards set forth
in Sections 11..13-4.D. al1d 11-13..4.E. of the City of Meridian Z011ing
and Development Ordinal1ce al1d i11 accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) reqtliremel1ts.
1.3 A drai11age plall desiglled by a State of Idaho licel1sed arcllitect or
el1gi11eer is required alld shall be Sllbmitted to the City El1gi11eer per
City Ordil1al1ce 11-13..4.B.4 for all off-street parlcing areas. All site
drainage shall be COl1tai11ed and disposed of OIl-site.
1.4 Outside lighting shall be designed a11d placed so as to not direct
illumination on any nearby residential areas al1d in accordance with
City Ordi11allce Section 11~13-4.C.
I ~5 Any existing domestic wells alld/or septic systelns within this project
shall have to be relTIoved froIn their dOlnestic service per City Ordil1ance
Section 9-1-4 alld 9-4-8. Wells lnay be used for 11on-dornestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 16
1.6 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural watelVlays,
il1tersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worl(s
Department.
1. 7 Provide lal1dscaping in accordal1ce with the Landscaping Ordinance,
Title 12, Chapter 13.
1.8 All trash al1dJor garbage collection areas shall be enclosed on at least
three (3) sides in accordallce with City Ordinance Section 11-12-I.C.
The applicant shall coordinate trash enclosure locations and
construction requirelnents witll Sanitary Service COlnpany (SSe) and
provide a letter of approval or plal1s stalnped by sse to the Planning &
Z011ing Department when applying for a Certificate of Zoning
COIn p liance.
1.9 Provide five-foot-wide sidewall<.s in accordance with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.1(.
1.1 0 All signage shall be in accordal1ce with the standards set forth ill Title
II, Chapter 14 of the City Zoning and Developmellt Ordinance.
1.11 All COllstruction shall c011forlTI to tIle requirelnents of the Atnericans
with Disabilities Act.
1.12 The entire site is located within the I-L Zone;, and the following uses
shall be lilnited uses in the I-L zone with a COllditional use perluit:r along
with any of the allowed I-L uses, as part of the Planned Developluent:
1. Daycare center
2 ~ Professional al1d sales offices
3. COlTIlnunity alld neighborhood shopping center
*The Meridian City Code allows for modifications of district
regulations, il1cluding suell exceptions pertaining to the district
regulations governing use (12-6-5), when the Inodification is desirable to
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I 7
(:..,.... .
acllieve the objectives of the Planl1ed Developlnent.
1.13 Prior to construction of the Western Electronics buildil1g, an agreernel1t
was Inade with ACHD concerning the acquisition of the rig11t-of-way on
Overland Road. No right-of -way was acquired for the installation of
curb, gutter or sidewallc along Overland Road and, as depicted 011 the
sublnitted site plan, there is currently no curb or gutter. A five-foot-wide
detached sidewall( 11as been installed along Overland in front of the
Western Electronics development as agreed to by the Developer and
ACHD. TIle rigllt-of-way acquisition on Overland for the Western
Electrol1ics development has been deferred until an ilnprovement project
is in design. There is no current ilnprovernel1t project in design at this
tilne to iluprove Overlal1d Road west of Stoddard Road. The Applicant
shall install a five-foot-wide detached sidewall( along the full length of
the plal1ned development, adjacent to Overland Road in line with the
existing sidewall(, alld the Applicant sllall provide dOCUlnentation froIn
ACHD addressing the resolution of t11e right-of-way issues prior to
issuance of a building perlnit~
1.14 The existing Wester11 Electronics facility is served by a privately owned
and lnailltained sewage lift statiol1 that discharges to a City of Meridiall
sewer mail1 in Overland Road~ The recently approved Bear Creel< Estates
Subdivision discharges to the same manhole. Because Bear Creel(
Estates was approved prior to tIle Western Electro11ics facility, only the
projected excess capacity in the receivillg sewer is available for the
Western Electronicsrr~V~ Technical Center project. COlnpllter lllodel
calcttlatiol1s show that the Western Electrollics lift station is limited to a
peale flow of 80 gallons per Ininute. The project shall contil1ue to be
served by the existil1g private lift station and pressure Inain until such
time as the Blacl( Cat Trunl< is available to serve this area. The lift
statiol11nay not discharge a flow greater than 80 gallons per Ininute at
any time. Provision shall be made in the sal1itary sewer systeln such that
the lift station ca11 be abandol1ed a11d the site sewer systelll connected to
the Blacl( Cat Trtlnlc Sewer, or a lateral thereofJ wIlen it is available.
"Available" shall be defined as the tilne when the sewer is extended
through adjacent property to the western boundary of this project. This
project shall illclude relocation of the lift station to tIle north"vest corner
or installation of dry-line sewer to the northwest corller with tllis
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 18
project~ The applicant shall be responsible for the eventual conl1ection
to the Blacl< Cat Tru111c Sewer. The City Council requires the applicant
pay uBlaclc Cat Trunl( SewerfJ fees at the tilne of building permit
issual1ce. These fees are estilnated at $1500 per equivalent residel1tial
unit (ERU) alld shall contribute to the eventual construction of the
Blacl< Cat Trunl< Sewer into which tllis project is designated to sewer4
1.15 The City of Meridial1 is in the process of drilling a l1ew dOlnestic well
withill the Bear Creelc Estates Subdivisioll to provide service to this
area. Preliminary fire flow delnand estilnates by the Meridian Fire
Departll1ent for this applicatio11 indicate that up to 2,300 gpm flow
could be required. Until the well is drilled and developed, its output rate
is unlmown. Additional developrnent within this project shall only
proceed to the extent that the particlllar building, or phase, has al1
adequate Sltpply of botll domestic alld fire protection water, as Inay be
deterlnilled by the City of Meridian Public Worl(s Departlnent, and the
Meridiall Fire Departlnent~
1.16 A site report establishing the highest seasollal grollndwater elevation
shall be sublnitted. to the Public Worl<s Department as part of the
construction plan approval process within the Planned Developlnel1t.
1.17 Conceptual engineering plans, including profiles, shall be sublnitted to
tile Public W or1<5 Department prior to the City Council hearing of this
application.
1.18 Conditions run with the land: Any conditio11S attached to a final
developlnel1t plan s11all run with the land and shall not lapse or be
waived as the result of any subsequent change in the tena11cy or
oW11ership of any or all said lands. Such C011ditions shall be deelned as
requiremel1ts for the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any use
or stl"ucture.
1.19 Design Review: All plal111ed developlnellts are subject to design review
by the City staff and Council (12-6-7H). All buildings, other tllan those
buildings constructed of lilce Inaterial and design as sublnitted, shall be
subject to further desigl1 review by the COUllCil alld Staff prior to
construction.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 19
1.20 The Applicant shall sublnit plans to tIle City Planning al1d Zoning
Director for approval of a comprehensive planned sign program in
accordallce with Section 11-14-9(E) of the Sign Ordinance. The design
of the signs included witllin the sign program shall il1corporate
materials, colors, al1d shall be reflective of a COmlTIOn theme that
illcorporates similar design elements in terlTIS of lnaterials, letter styles,
sign type and Sigl1 shape~
1.21 All utilities, includil1g water, sanitary and storm sewers, electricity, gas
and telephone lines shall be i11stalled underground in either the ptlblic
right of way or utility easements~ The design for adequate storm sewer
facilities shall be provided to the City Engineer and ACHD for review
prior to construction.
1.22 A copy of the bylaws or other deed restrictions which provide for the
maintenance and control of all the opel1 space and COffilnon area shall
be provided to the COUI1Cil for review prior to approval.
I ~23 All required perilueter lalldscapil1g buffers (along Overland Road and 1-
84) shall be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy perlnit for
any newly constructed btlilding within the planned developlnent. All
interior landscaping shall be installed pursuant to the Landscapil1g
Ordinance as additiol1al buildillgS are constructed witllin the planned
developluent.
I ~24 Only minor cha11ges shall be Inade in tIle locatiol1, sitil1g, al1d height of
the proposed buildings, as authorized by the Building Official or as
required by engineering or other unforeseen circumstances. Additiollally,
no such lninor changes shall i11crease the volulue of allY building or
structure by Inore than I 0 perce11t (12-6-6F). *The Applicant l1as
requested that tIle sublnitted site plall be considered conceptual in
nature, lneanillg applica11t does 110t want to be liluited to the nUluber,
size, design or locatiol1 of buildings, parl<.ing lots or landscaping. The
Applicant has stated that the developlnent shall be driven by mar!<et
demand. Approving a Conditional Use Permit for a planned
developlnent witll nothi11g Inore tllal1 a conceptual site plan to be driven
by Inarl<et demalld allows the developer to do essentially whatever tIley
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 20
c...:..:...
would lilce to do in the future without further approvals from the
Councilor COlnmission. Conditions are placed upon the applicant to
obtain a Conditional Use Pertuit for each building within the planl1ed
development, illtended for office, retail, or day care use.
1.25 A recorded subdivision shall be required for any dedicatiol1 of public
rigllt-of-way (with the exception of dedication on Overland Road, the
widenillg of whicl1 is in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive
Plan. ), or the reconfiguration of existing parcels.
1.26 TIle City Councillnal<es it clear tllat this is actually, as presented, a
conceptual plall for a Conditional Use Permit. The developer shall be
required to return to the COlnmission al1d City Council for approval
through the conditional use permit process of all office, retail or day
care llses in the I-L zone.
Adopt the Central District Health Departlnent's Recoffilnendations as follows:
1.27 The ApplicantJs central sewage and central water plalls shall be
SUbll1itted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Healtll &
Welfare, Division of Environlnental Quality.
1.28 RUl1-off is not to create a 1110Squito breeding probleln.
1.29 Storll1water shall be pretreated throllgh a grassy swale prior to discharge
to the subsllrface to prevel1t ilnpact to groulldwater al1d surface water
quality, or if other IneallS of pretreatlnel1t of starIn water discharge is
provided, thel1 Applicallt shall furnish to the Public Worl(s Departlnent
a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintel1ance Manual, il1Cludillg a
schedule of regular mail1tena11ce for the drains. A COlnlnitment shall be
reqllired. that in the evel1t tile drail1s do not effectively worle, either
through problelTIS witll desigl1 or maintenance, development of new
plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be
required.
1 ~30 The Engil1eers al1d architects il1volved with the design of the subject
project shall obtain current best Inanagell1ent practices for stormwater
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 21
//..
l
.~~
disposal and design a storluwater lnanagelnent systelTI tllat prevents
groundwater and surface water degradation~
Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Departlnent as follows:
1.31 Applicants shall satisfy all fire code requirelnents including t110se
pertaining to water flow and fire sprinlder systems and hydrants.
Adopt the Recoffilnendatiol1S of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
1 ~32 Applical1t shall COll1ply with ACHD's letters dated April 2, 200 I al1d
April 4, 2001, and a11Y future letter(s) on the project whe11 thorough
review of the site is cOlnpleted.
Adopt the ReCOlTIlnel1datiollS of tIle Natnpa & Meridian Irrigation District as
follows:
1 ~33 The Nalnpa & Meridian Irrigatiol1 District's I(ennedy Lateral courses
alo11g the south and west boundaries of the project~ Any ellcroachlnent
without writtel1 approval, plans and a signed License Agreement are
unacceptable~ All storlll drainage shall be retained 011 site~
Adopt the Recommendations of the Sal1ital)' Service as follows:
1 ~34 Ellclosure sizes shall be reviewed for waste capacity~
Adopt the Recolnmendations of tIle Water Department as follows:
1 ~35 Additional developlnent withil1 this project shall only proceed to the
extent that the particular building, or phase, has an adequate supply of
both domestic al1d fire protection water, as Inay be determined by the
City of Meridia11 Public W orles Departlnel1t, and the Meridian Fire
Departlnel1 t~
2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian
CityCodeS 11~17-9.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 22
shalllneet such requirements as a conditio11 of approval of the application for a
conditional use perlnit4
4~ That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Perluit
in accordance with this Decisiol1, WIlich shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerl(
and thell a copy served by the ClerIc UpOll the applicant, the Plannillg and Zoning
Departmel1t, the Public Worl<s Departl11ent and any affected party requesting notice.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please ta!ce notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City
of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code 9 6 7 -65 21 an affected person being a person
who has an interest ill real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance
or denial of the conditional use permit approval may vvithin twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this d.ecision and order seelc a judicial review as provided by Chapter
52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
/q~
By action of the City COUI1Cil at its regular lneeting held 011 the
day of J~
, 2001.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON
VOTED
tL-
COUNCILMAN I<EITH BIRD
VOTED
j \w...-
COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD
VOTED
.#~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 23
COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED
MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAICER) VOTED
DATED: 6 -19-.o(
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
Copy served UpOl1 Applicant, Plal1ni11g and Zoning Departlnent, Public Worl(s
Departmellt and the City Attorney.
",1\"yt\ \ u't -rJ Jill/II
\\~ t !\:A~ J,/,
,,\. 0" nnc.!;/.",- I~J
" ...1 ~1 ~t _~, ..s~ ~
v" ~",. ~~ ~,?
~"' .r~ aeOb.At '1A:" ~
"" V Or~. U"f h ...v ~
~ ~G ~ . .,,~
;; ,. . ~ .: . ~ - -
; ~<t /f' #
~ . .J~ .. f;) i? "i.-.....
" ~.. I~-t.
~ 7o~;tir 1C~ .. ...;~
Z:\ W ork\M.\Meri di an \Nleri di an 15360M\Locust Grove ~~"'~~&-U~~~I~~~~003.dOC
r. }- I J, .. ~ ';" ~<J t. . ., . ,\ \ \ \ \
l1j I ~ Z.i~.~. .t:{; i'),.;\~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 24
(::........~
c
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
C/C 05/0 1/0 I
Revised 06/22/0 I
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED )
DEVELOPMENT TO INCLUDE )
OFFICE, RETAIL AND )
INDUSTRIAL USES FOR THE )
PROPOSED TREASURE )
VALLEY TECHNICAL CENTER, )
IN AN I-L ZONE, LOCATED )
ADJACENT TO 1-84, )
NORTHWEST OF THE )
INTERSECTION OF )
STODDARD AND OVERLAND )
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
)
MERIDIAN FREEWAY )
ASSOCIATESIDBSI )
INDUSTRIAL LIMITED )
PARTNERSHIP. )
)
APPLICANT )
)
Case No. CUP-Q I M009
ORDER GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I ~ This Inatter COIning before the City COU11Cil on the 15th day of May,
200 1, under the provisions of Meridial1 City Code ~ 11-17 -4 for final action 011
conditional use permit application and the COtlllCil having received a11d approving the
Recommendation of the Plannil1g and ZOlling COffiluission the COUllCil talces tIle
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIA TESIDBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
- I
rI''; .
(
_./~
(
followillg action:
2~ That the above nalned applicant is granted a conditiol1al use pertuit for
a planned developlnent to include office, retail, day care and industrial uses for the
proposed Treasure Valley Technical Center, in an I-L ZOlle located adjacent to 1-84,
110rthwest of the intersection of Stoddard alld Overlalld Road) Meridian, Idaho,
subject to the followillg conditions of use al1d development:
Adopt the ReCOlTIlnelldations of the Planning and Zoning a11d Engineering
Staff as follows:
2.1 Off-street parl<ing shall be provided in accordal1ce with Section 11-13 of
the City of Meridian Z011il1g and Developlnent Ordi11ance and/or as
detailed ill site-specific requirements~
2~2 Paving alld stripil1g sllall be in accordallce with the standards set fortll
in Sections 11-13-4.D~ and 11-13-4~E. of the City of Meridian Zoning
alld Developmellt Ordinance and ill accordal1ce with Americalls with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirelnents.
2~3 A draillage plan desigl1ed by a State of Idaho lice11sed architect or
el1gil1eer is required and shall be sublnitted to tIle City Engineer per
City Ordinance 11-13-4~B~4 for all off-street parl<.ing areas~ All site
drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site~
2~4 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct
illtlmillation on any nearby residel1tial areas and it1 accordance with
City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C~
2~5 Any existing dOlnestic wells al1d/or septic systems within this project
shall have to be relnoved frolll their dOlnestic service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 al1d 9-4-8. Wells lnay be used for 11on-dolnestic purposes
SUCll as landscape irrigatiol1~
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATESIDBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
R2
2.6 All irrigatiol1 ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall
be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the
appropriate irrigatiol1/drainage district, or lateral users association, with
written cOl1firlnation of said approval submitted to the Ptlblic W orl<s
Departlnent.
2~ 7 Provide landscaping in accordance with the La11dscaping Ordinal1ce,
Title 12, Chapter 13.
2~8 All trash and/or garbage collection areas shall be el1closed on at least
three (3) sides in accorda11ce with City Ordinance Section 11-12-1.C.
The applicant shall coordi11ate trash enclosure locations alld
construction requirelnents with Sal1itary Service Company (SSe) and
provide a letter of approval or plal1s stalnped by sse to the Planning &
Zoning Departmel1t whell applying for a Certificate of Zoning
Compliance.
2.9 Provide five-foot-wide sidewall(s in accordal1ce with City Ordinance
Section 12-5-2.1(.
2.10 All signage shall be ill accordance witll tIle standards set forth in Title
11) Chapter 14 of the City Zoning alld Development Ordillance.
2.11 All COllstructio11 shall conforln to the requirell1ellts of the .A1nericans
with Disabilities Act.
2.12 The entire site is located withil1 the I-L Zone;, and t11e following uses
shall be lilnited uses in the }..L zone with a conditiol1al use permit, along
with any of the allowed I-L uses, as part of the Planned Developlue11t:
I. Daycare cel1ter
2. Professional al1d sales offices
3~ COlTIlTIUnity and neighborhood shopping center
*The Meridial1 City Code allows for lnodifications of district
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATESIDBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OlMO009
..3
regt.llations7 includillg such exceptions pertainillg to the district
regulations governing use (12-6M5)1 vvhen the modification is desirable to
achieve the objectives of the Planned Development.
2.13 Prior to constructiol1 of the Wester11 Electronics buildi11g, an agreement
was made witll ACHD concernil1g the acquisition of the right-of-way on
Overlal1d Road. No right-of -way was acquired for the installation of
curb, gutter or sidewallc along Overland Road and, as depicted on the
sublnitted site plan, there is currently no curb or gutter. A five-foot-wide
detached sidewallc has been installed along Overland in froIlt of the
Westerl1 Electronics developlnent as agreed to by the Developer and
ACHD~ The right-of-way acquisition on Overland for the Wester11
Electrol1ics developlnent has been deferred Ul1til an improvement project
is in design. There is no currel1t improvelnent project in desigIl at t11is
time to improve Overland Road west of Stoddard Road. The Applicant
shall install a five-foot-wide detached sidewallc along the full length of
the planned developlnent1 adjacent to Overland Road in line with the
existing sidewall<, and tIle Applica11t shall provide docUlnel1tation froIn
ACHD addressillg tIle resolution of the rigllt~of-way issues prior to
issuance of a building pertuit.
2. 14 The existing Western Electro11ics facility is served by a privately oW11ed
and Inaintained sewage lift station that discharges to a City of Meridial1
sewer l11ain in Overland Road. The recently approved Bear Creel( Estates
Subdivision discharges to the saIne manhole. Because Bear Creel<
Estates was approved prior to the Western Electronics facility, only the
projected excess capacity in the receivil1g sewer is available for the
Western Electronics/T.V. Tecll11ical Ce11ter project. COlnputer model
calculations show that the Western Electronics lift station is lilnited to a
peal< flow of 80 gallons per lninute. The project shall continue to be
selVed by the existil1g private lift station and pressure mail1 until such
time as the Blaclc Cat Trunl< is available to serve this area~ The lift
station may not discharge a flow greater tllan 80 gallo11s per lninute at
allY tilne. Provisioll shall be Inade in the sanitary sewer systelTI such that
the lift station can be aballdoned and the site sewer systeln connected to
the Blacl< Cat Trunl( Sewer 1 or a lateral thereof, when it is available.
"Available" shall be defil1ed as tIle tilne whe11 the sewer is extended
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATES/DBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI..009
~4
c.. .
through adjacent property to the western boundary of this project. This
project shall include relocatio11 of the lift station to the northwest corner
or installation of dry-lil1e sewer to t11e northwest corner with this
project~ The applicant shall be responsible for the eventual cOl111ection
to the Blacl< Cat Trunl( Sewer~ The City Council requires the applicant
pay "Blacl< Cat Trunlc Seweru fees at the time of buildillg permit
issuance~ These fees are estimated at $1500 per equivalent residential
unit (ERU) and shall contribute to the evel1tual COl1strtlction of the
Blaclc Cat Tru111< Sewer illto which this project is desig11ated to sewer.
2.15 The City of Meridian is in the process of drilling a l1ew domestic well
witlli11 the Bear Creel( Estates Subdivisiol1 to provide service to this
area. Preliminary fire flow delnand estimates by the Meridian Fire
Departmel1t for t11is application indicate that up to 2,300 gpll1 flow
could be required. Until the well is drilled al1d developed, its output rate
is Ul11<110wn. Additiol1al developlnent within this project shall only
proceed to the extent that the particular building, or phase, has an
adequate supply of both domestic and fire protection water, as Inay be
deterlnined by the City of Meridian Public W orl(s Department, and the
Meridian Fire Departlnent.
2.16 A site report establishing the higllest seasonal groundwater elevatiol1
shall be sublnitted to the Public W orl<s Departlnent as part of the
construction plal1 approval process within tIle Planned Developlnent~
2.17 COllceptual engil1eering 1)lal1S, il1Cludillg profiles, shall be submitted to
the Public W orI(s Departlnent prior to the City COUllCil hearing of this
application.
2.18 C011ditions run with the land: fu1Y conditio11S attached to a final
developlnellt plal1 shall run with the lal1d al1d shall110t lapse or be
waived as the result of al1Y subsequent cllange in the tenancy or
oW11ership of any or all said lands~ Such conditions shall be deelned as
requirelnents for the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any use
or structure.
2.19 Design Review: All planned developments are subject to design review
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATES/DBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
..5
by the City staff and COUI1Cil (12-6-7H). All buildings, other than those
buildings constructed of lilce material al1d design as submitted1 shall be
subject to further design review by the COUI1Cil and Staff prior to
construction.
2~20 The Applicant shall sublnit plans to the City Planning and Zoning
Director for approval of a cOluprehensive planned sign program in
accordance with Section 11-14-9(E) of the Sign Ordinance. The design
of the signs il1cluded within the sign program shall incorporate
Inaterials, colors, and shall be reflective of a caffiInan theIne that
incorporates similar design elell1ents in terlTIS of materials, letter styles,
sign type and sign shape~
2.21 All utilities, i11cluding water, sanitary and storm sewers, electricity, gas
and telephol1e lines shall be installed undergrou11d in either the public
right of way or tltility easelnents. The design for adequate storm sewer
facilities shall be provided to the City Engi11eer alld ACHD for review
prior to construction.
2~22 A copy of the bylaws or other deed restrictions Wllich provide for t11e
luaintenance alld control of all tIle opel1 space and COllllllon area shall
be provided to the Council for review prior to approval~
2.23 All required perimeter lalldscaping buffers (alol1g Overland Road and 1-
84) shall be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy perluit for
any newly constructed building witllin the plallned developlnent. All
interior landscaping sllall be installed pursuant to the Landscaping
Ordinance as additional buildings are constructed withil1 tile planl1ed
developluent.
2.24 Only Ininor changes shall be made in the locatio!1, siting1 and l1eight of
the proposed buildings, as authorized by the Building Official or as
required by engineering or other unforeseen circumstances. Additionally,
no such minor changes shall increase the volulne of any buildil1g or
structure by lnore than I 0 perce11t (12-6-6F). *The Applicant llas
requested that the sublnitted site plal1 be COl1sidered conceptllal in
l1ature, meanil1g applicallt does not want to be lilnited to tIle nUlnber,
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATES/DBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
~6
~/
{.
t~. .
size, desigtl or locatiol1 of buildings, parlcing lots or landscaping. The
Applicant has stated that the development shall be driven by Inarl<et
delnand. Approving a Conditional Use Perluit for a planned
developlnent with nothing more tllall a conceptual site plan to be drivel1
by lnarl<et delnand allows the developer to do essentially whatever they
would lil<e to do in the future without furtller approvals froIn the
Councilor COlnlnission. Co.nditiol1S are placed upon the applicant to
obtain a Conditional Use Pertuit for each. building withill the planl1ed
developlnent, intel1ded for office, retail, or day care use.
2.25 A recorded subdivisio11 shall be required for any dedication of public
right-of-way (with the exception of dedication 011 Overland Road, tIle
widening of which is in accordance with the Meridian COlnprehensive
Plan.), or the reco11figuratioll of existing parcels.
2.26 The City Council mal<es it clear that this is actually, as presented, a
conceptual plan for a Conditional Use Pertuit. The developer shall be
required to return to the COlnlllission and City Council for approval
through the conditional use permit process of all office, retail or day
care uses in the I-L zone.
Adopt the Central District Health Departlnent's RecommendatiollS as follows:
2.27 The ApplicantJs central sewage and central water plans shall be
sublnitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &
Welfare, Division of Ellviro11111el1tal Quality.
2.28 Run-off is not to create a lnosquito breeding probleln.
2.29 StorIllwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge
to tile subsurface to prevent ilnpact to groundwater and surface water
qualitY7 or if other means of pretreatlnent of storm water discharge is
provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public W orl(s Departlnent
a copy of the proposed Operatioll and Mail1tel1ance Manual, includillg a
schedule of regular maintena11ce for the drains. A COffilnitment shall be
reqtlired that in the eve11t the draills do not effectively worl<, either
through problems witll design or Inaintenance, developlnent of new
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATES/DBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
- 7
( .
t,......:. .
plans for a means to pretreat the starIn water discharge shall be
req tlired.
2~30 The Engineers and architects involved with tIle design of the subject
project shall obtail1 current best management practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents
groundwater and surface water degradation~
Adopt the Recolnluendations of the Meridiall Fire Department as follows:
2.31 Applicants shall satisfy all fire code requirelnents including those
pertailling to water flow and fire sprinlder systelns and 11ydrants~
Adopt the Recomlnendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows:
2.32 Applicant shall comply with ACHD's letters dated April 2, 2001 and
April 4, 2001, and any future letter(s) on the project wilen tllorough
review of the site is cOlnpleted~
Adopt the Recomlnendatio11S of the Natupa & Meridian Irrigation District as
follows:
2~33 The Nalnpa & Meridiall Irrigation District's I(ennedy Lateral courses
alollg tile south and west bou11daries of the project~ Any e11croachlnent
without writtell approval1 plans a11d a signed License Agreement are
ullacceptable. All storln drainage sllall be retail1ed on site.
Adopt the Recoffilnel1dations of the Sanitary.Service as follows:
2~34 Enclosure sizes shall be reviewed for waste capacity.
Adopt the Recolnmendations of t11e Water Department as follows:
2~35 Additional developmel1t within this project shall only proceed to the
extent that the particular building, or phase) has an adequate supply of
both dOlnestic and fire protectio11 water) as may be deterlnined by the
City of Meridian Public Worl(s Department, and the Meridian Fire
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATESIDBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI-009
-8
t... .
\. .
Department.
3. The above COl1ditiol1S are COl1cluded to be reasonable and the applical1t
shalllneet such requirelnents as a COl1ditiol1 of approval of the application for a
conditional use perlnit.
4. Notice to Perlnit Holder) tllis COl1ditional use perlnit is not transferable
without cOlnplyil1g with the provisiollS of Meridian City Code 9 11-17 -8, a copy of
whicl1 is attached to this perluit.
By action of the City Council at its regular lneeting held 011 the
a Ii
/-/~'
day of
~~
, 200 I ~
. ~
D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian
Copy served UpOl1 Applicant, tl1e Planning and Zoning Department, Public W orl(s
Departrne11t and City Attorl1ey.
f~ z 2-.--0 (
By. Dated:
City ClerIc : r, ~
~ . ~?~) ri~:t.:::
Z~or~eridia~eridian 15360~reasure~all~ch~ntrC~OI-OO~rder~~POl-009.doc
!~ tI '~\. \.9~ ~ ~
.1,/ . L 0 iJ":".1'~;: 'l ' ,......~
,~ > J i;; ; ! ~ -;'t~~ '-~'. ..:.:~ .2:~.i:; \\\ \,\ \
ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY MERIDIAN
FREEWAY ASSOCIATES/DBSI INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / CUP-OI~009
- 9
* 1)
"I
~ .J~
(,.
(
. ... . . . . .. .
City of Meridian.. ..: ..... . ..
Public Works Dept. .
. .. . ..
To: Mayor and City Council
~u/
From: Brad Watsont P~E.
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE
Date: 06/15/01
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for June 19 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
June 19 City Council agenda. under Department Reports, for Councilfs consideration:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Proiect - Chanae Order No.1.. This project
included installation of a City water main loop around the VWVTP to provide fire
protection and process water for the new dewatering facility ~ Inninger Construction
was awarded the contract on March 27,2001 by City Council. Change Order No.1
involves both additions and deletions to contract as listed on the attached change
order form. The net increase to the contract is $2f913" 71 for an amended contract
total of $70,607.71" .
Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order No.1 for the WWTP
Water Line Project in the amount $2,913.71 and authorize the Mayor to sign
and City Clerk to attest the contract
2)
Locust Grove Road! Fairview to Ustick - Agreement for Roadway ConstructionNVater
& Sewer ImDrovements.. As you are likely aware, ACHD is planning to reconstruct
and widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road. The Public
Works Department retained the roadway engineer (JUS Engineers, approved by City
Council 2-27-01) to design all water and sewer facilities remaining in Locust Grove
Road necessary to serve all properties along this area. The agreement with ACHD, a
copy of which is enclosed, provides that ACHD will include the water and sewer
improvements in their bid package and provide contract administration of the project.
The City entered into a similar agreement with ACHD for From the desk of..
the FrankJin RoadlMeridian Road Project several years
ago" The agreement states that the City of Meridian will
reimburse ACHD up to $6,000.00. The actual amount will.
be on the proportionate share of the total project costs
Brad Watsoo, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Wa1ertower lane, Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
ePage1 .
(208) 89&-5500
Fox: (208) 887-1297
watsonb@ci.meridian.idus
t"
that are attributable to the water and sewer improvements. A preliminary cost
estimate states that the water and sewer costs at approximately $194iOOO out of a
total project estimate of $1,950,000, or roughly 10%.
Recommended Council Action: Accept the Agreement for Roadway
Construction/Sewer & Water Line Improvements with Ada County Highway
District for construction contract administration in an amount not to exceed
$6,000 and authorize ~e Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
3) Biosolids Dewatering Facility - Increase to Carollo Enaineersf Professional Services
Aoreement As detailed in the enclosed Jetter from Carollo Engineers, delays
associated with completion of the digester project, stabilization of the digestion
process after completion and inadequacy of the water supply system to operate the
dewatering facility, start-up and performance testing of the system has been delayed
and prolonged. Carollo Engineers is requesting an increase to the construction
services portion of their agreement in the amount of $7,100.00. As outlined in their
letter, the total construction services portion of the agreement would increase from
$45,324 to $52J424~ The Public Works Department agrees with their assessment of
the situation and recommends amending their agreement. Carollo Engineers has
provided the City with excellent service throughout the course of this project
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Agreement Amendment with
Carollo Engineers for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility increasing the
construction services task order amount from $45,324 to $52,424 and authorize
the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
4) Water and Wastewater Deoartments - Diesel Fuel Delivery & Storace Eaui[)ment
Leasina Proaram. As mentioned at the May 18 City Council meeting) the Water and
Wastewater Departments have been working with their normal fuel supplier, Brico of
Idaho, to provide a fuel delivery truck and storage trailer this summer. The purpose of
this program is to provide fuel for the emergency generators at four wells, the three
units at the VVVVTP and the trailer-mounted unit for lift stations~ The equipment would
be stored at the V\lWTP with the storage trailer being in one the sludge drying beds
(to provide secondary containment)~
The cost for the fuel delivery truck is $1 DO/day and the storage trailer would be
$750/month. Assuming a lease period of July 1 through September 30f the total
lease amount would be $9,200 for the delivery truck and $2,250 for the storage trailer.
A copy of a lease agreement is enclosed and has been sent to the City Attorney's
office for review.
Recommendation: The Public Works, Water and Wastewater Deparbnents
recommend that the lease agreement be executed for both the fuel delivery
truck and the storage trailer. If the Council wishes to reduce the expenditure,
we feel that at least having the fuel delivery truck on standby at the WWTP is
appropriate.
5) Lease Aareement For Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19.. This item
was previously presented to Council at the May 18 meeting at which Council directed
us to gather more information. Specifically, we were instructed to: 1) work with
. Page 2
c.::..... ...
c.:....
Western States. the low bidder, on negotiating a month-by-month lease rather the
weekly lease amount originally solicited, and 2) obtain written information from Idaho
Power Company as to the likelihood af blackouts this summer.
Western States offered a modified lease price of $2,300/month compared to the
$575/week originally submitted.. Assuming a 31-day month, the monthly lease would
save about $250/month ($2,546 vs. $2,300).
While Gary Smith spoke with Arden Davis of Idaho Power Company several weeks
ago about the possibility of power outages this summer, he has not yet received
written information from him.. We hope to provide written information to Council by
the June 19 meeting.
Recommendation: We will provide a recommendation after discussion at the
Council meeting June 19.
I apologize for the length of this memo. There is a fine line between being concise and
thorough.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 3
rt~ 1-
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
DATE:
June 41 2001
ORDER NO.:
1
CONTRACT FOR: WWTP Water Line Proiect
OWNER: CITY OF MERIDIANt IDAHO
TO: IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
(Contractor)
You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract
plans and specifications:
Description of Changes In INCREASE ~ DECREASE
This Change Order in Contract in Contract
· (list separately) Price Price
See attached detailed list, Exhibit nAil $4,978.51 $2,064.80
Sum of Increase and Decrease: $4,978.51 $2,O64~80
Net Change in Contract Price: $2,913.71
JUSTIFICATION (attach supplemental documents):
See attached list, Exhibit riA"
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE:
Original Contract Price:
Previous Change Orders No. none to No.. none:
Contract Price prior to this Change Order:
Net (Increase/Decrease) of this Change Order:
Contract Price with all approved Change Orders:
$67~694.00
-0-
$67 .694.00
$ 2.913.71
$70,607.71
:r~ .4
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME:
Original Contract Time:
Previous Change Orders No. none to No~ none:
Contract Time prior to this Change Order:
Net (Increase/Decrease) of this Change Order:
Contract Time with all approved Change Orders:
30 days (4/9-5/9/01)
30 days
30 days (4/9-5/9/01)
o days
30 days (4/9-5/9/01)
This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will
apply hereto.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CHANGE ORDER LIMITS BY CONTRACTOR
The increase or decrease in Contract price and/or Contract time stated in each and every
Change Order shall unequivocally comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or
owed the CONTRACTOR for the work or changes ordered by the Change Order. By
executing the change Orderf the CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that the
stipulated price and/or time adjustments represent full compensation for all increases or
decreases in cost or the time required to perform the Contract as whole arising directly or
indirectly from the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the
interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple
effect on all other non-affected work under Contract not changed by the Change Order.
Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the
adjustment in Contract price and/or time, subject to the current scope of the entire work as
set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this Change order constitutes an
agreement between Owner and CONTRACTOR that the Change Order represents an
equitable adjustment to the Contractf and that CONTRACTOR will waive all rights to fife a
claim of the Change Order after it is properly executed.
All Change Orders shall include a written record, submitted by the CONTRACTOR, that
states the basis of cost amount. including time and materials data, that enables the Owner
to determine the necessity and reasonableness of the Change Order.
Recommended By Engineer:
Printed Name: \3 ('<:).~ WQ., -r~~ V\
DATE: 6 -. 4-a J
Approved By:
CONTRACTOR
DA TE:
(Signature)
(Printed Name)
Ti tie
OWNER
DATE:
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
Attest:
William G. Berg, Jr~l City Clerk
Approved By City Council:
("
./!.....
f
\..:.
J:fye.~!L
Page1of1
CITY OF MERIDIAN 2001 K'K'TP - WA TER LINE
Date: 4-Jun-01
Contractor; Irminger Constructiont J nc.
Change Order Wctksheet No.:
One
Est Total Scheduled Quantity Value Quantity Overrun Cost Added
Item Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Value Com p reted Com pJ eted (underMrun) (deieted)
1 Mob Uizat ion 1 LS $31000.00 $3,000400 1 $3,000.00 0 $0.00
2 8" PVC Water1ine 3290 LF $9.80 $32t242EOO 3089 $30,272.20 (201 ) ($1 t 969.80)
3 6t. PVC Waterline 70 LF $8.00 $560400 71 $568~OO 1 $8.00
4 Fi re I-Iyd rant Assy 4 EA $1.400~OO $5,600.00 4 $5t600.00 0 $0.00
5 81' Gate VaJve 4 EA $8OOLOO $2.400.00 4 S2.400~ 00 0 SO. 00
6 6" Gate Valve 4 EA $450400 $11800.00 4 $1 ,800.00 0 $0.00
7 8" Tee, All MJ FL 3 EA $500.00 $11500.00 3 $1 ~500.00 0 $0.00
8 81'x8lt)d3fl T E!e~ MJ x MJ x FL 4 EA $275.00 $1 t 100400 4 $1,100.00 0 $0.00
9 an 9Q..Deg Bendt MJ x MJ 10 EA $160.00 $1 ,600.00 7 $1 t 120~OO (3) ($480.00)
10 811 45-Deg Bendt MJ x MJ 3 EA $150.00 $450.00 5 $750.00 2 $300.00
11 au 45-Deg Bend, FL x MJ 1 EA $200400 $200.00 0 $0.00 (1 ) ($200.00)
12 an 22 1/2-Deg Bend 1 MJ x MJ 2 EA $150.00 $300.00 0 $O~ 00 (2) ($300400)
13 8" 22 1/2-Deg Bend, FL x MJ 1 EA $200rOO $200~OO 0 $0.00 (1 ) ($200+00)
14 Bit 11 1/4-Deg Bend. MJ x MJ 2 EA $150400 $300.00 0 $0.00 (2) ($300.00)
15 2t Ser\Ii ce SaddJ e 2 EA $200ROO $400.00 2 $400.00 0 $0.00
16 8" MJ Plug 2 EA $50rOO $100.00 2 $100.00 0 $0.00
17 21 Water service Line 45 EA $20.00 $900.00 51 51.020.00 8 $120.00
18 Site BackflOYl assy 1 EA $11 ~500.00 $11.500.00 1 $11.500~OO 0 $0.00
19 Type ttP" Surface Repair 197 LF $6.00 $1 J 182.00 274 $1.644.00 n $462.00
20 Type 3 Surface repair 120 LF $3~ 00 $380.00 285 $855.00 165 $495.00
21 Mise Fence Repair and Site Restoration 1 LS $2.000.00 $2.000.00 1 $21000~ 00 0 $0.00
Totals: $67.694.00 $65,629.20 (52t064480)
ADDfTIONAL ITEMS
2U f.Aeter Assembly 1 LS $1 t498.46 $11498.46 1 $1 .498446 S1t49S446
eo 22 1/2 bend1 MJ x MJ 1 LS 5214.59 $214r59 1 $214.59 $214.59
Fire Hydrant wI 41-6u bury 1 LS $195.48 $195448 1 $195r48 $195~48
Ch~e4"RPBAto6ftRP8A 1 LS $1 t324.98 $1 ,324.98 1 $1,324.98 $1 t 324.98
10 x 8 reducer, MJ x MJ 1 EA $275.00 $275.00 1 $275~ 00 $275.00
1 ~ ball valve 2 EA $35.00 $70.00 2 $70.00 $70.00
2-t curb stop wI grip j04nt fitting 1 EA $1 OO~OO $1 00.00 1 $100400 $1 00.00
an gate vaJve~ MJ x MJ 2 EA $650.00 $1 t300.00 2 $1 t3OO~OO $11300~ 00
Addilionalltems Totals: $4t978.51 $4~978.51 $4t978~51
Change Order T otal5: $72.672r51 $701607~71 $2,913.71
Original Contract Amount:
Plus Change Orders Comp1eted To Date:
Revised Contract Amount:
$67 ~694.00
$2,913.71
$70~607.71
001 ~worksheet.xjs I Exhibit A
; , .i'
. .
. .
. . .
City of Meridian.. ....... ....
Public Works Dept...
. .
(..:. ..
\<:........ .
( .
To: Mayor and City Council
~V
From: Brad Watsont P.E.
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE
Date: 06/15/01
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for June 19 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
June 19 City Council agenda. under Department ReportsJ for Council's consideration:
1 ) Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Proiect - Chance Order No.. 1. This project
included installation of a City water main loop around the WVVTP to provide fire
protection and process water for the new dewatering facility. Irminger Construction
was awarded the contract on March 27, 2001 by City Council.. Change Order No" 1
involves both additions and deletions to contract as listed on the attached change
order form.. The net increase to the contract is $2J913.71 for an amended contract
total of $70,607 .71.
Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order No.1 for the WWTP
Water Line Project in the amount $2,913.71 and authorize the Mayor to sign
and City Clerk to attest the contract
I 2)
Locust Grove Road, Fairview to Ustick - Aareement for Roadwav ConstructionNVater
& Sewer Imorovements. As you are likely aware, ACHD is planning to reconstruct
and widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road.. The Public
Works Department retained the roadway engineer (JUB Engineers, approved by City
Council 2-27 -01) to design all water and sewer facilities remaining in Locust Grove
Road necessary to serve all properties along this area. The agreement with ACHD, a
copy of which is enclosed, provides that ACHD will include the water and sewer
improvements in their bid package and provide contract administration of the project.
The City entered into a similar agreement with ACHD for From 1hcdcsk of..
the Franklin RoadlMeridian Road Project several years
ago. The agreement states that the City of Meridian will
reimburse ACHD up to $6,000.00. The actual amount will
be on the proportionate share of the total project costs
Brad Watsoot P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lane; Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1291
watson I:@ci.nu:ridian.idus
that are attributable to the water and sewer improvements. A preliminary cost
estimate states that the water and sewer costs at approximately $194,000 out of a
total project estimate of $1 ,950,000, or roughly 10%4
Recommended Council Action: Accept the Agreement for Roadway
Construction/Sevver & Water Line Improvements with Ada County Highway
District for construction contract administration in an amount not to exceed
$6,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
3) Biosofids Dewaterinq Facility - Increase to Carono Enaineersf Professional Services
Agreement As detailed in the enclosed letter from Carollo Engineers, delays
associated with completion of the digester project, stabilization of the digestion
process after completion and inadequacy of the water supply system to operate the
dewatering facility J start-up and perfonnance testing of the system has been delayed
and prolonged. Carollo Engineers is requesting an increase to the construction
services portion of their agreement in the amount of $7 J 1 00.00. As outlined in their
I ette rr the total construction services portion of the agreement would increase from
$45,324 to $52,424. The Public Works Department agrees with their assessment of
the situation and recommends amending their agreement Carollo Engineers has
provided the City with excellent service throughout the course of this project.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Agreement Amendment with
Carollo Engineers for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility increasing the
construction services task order amount from $45,324 to $52,424 and authorize
the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
4) Water and Wastewater Departments - Diesel Fuel Deliverv & Storage Eauipment
Leasing Proqram. As mentioned at the May 18 City Council meeting, the Water and
Wastewater Departments have been working with their normal fuel supplier, Brico of
Idaho, to provide a fuel delivery truck and storage trailer this summer. The purpose of
this program is to provide fuel for the emergency generators at four wells, the three
units at the WWTP and the trailer-mounted unit for lift stations.. The equipment would
be stored at the WWTP with the storage trailer being in one the sludge drying beds
(to provide secondary containment)~
The cost for the fuel delivery truck is $1 DO/day and the storage trailer would be
$750/month. Assuming a lease period of July 1 through September 301 the total
lease amount would be $9,200 for the delivery truck and $2,250 for the storage trailer.
A copy of a lease agreement is enclosed and has been sent to the City Attorney's
office for review.
Recommendation: The Public Works, Water and Wastewater Deparbnents
recommend that the lease agreement be executed for both the fuel delivery
truck and the storage trailer. If the Council wishes to reduce the expenditure,
'Ne feel that at least having the fuel delivery truck on standby at the WWTP is
appropriate.
5) Lease Aoreement For Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19. This item
was previously presented to Council at the May 18 meeting at which Council directed
us to gather more information. Specifically, we were instructed to: 1) work with
. Page 2
Western States, the low bidder, on negotiating a month-by-month lease rather the
weekly lease amount originally solicited, and 2) obtain written information from Idaho
Power Company as to the likelihood of blackouts this summer.
Western States offered a modified lease price of $2,300/month compared to the
$575/week originally submitted4 Assuming a 31-day monthJ the monthly lease would
save about $250/month ($2,546 vs. $2,300).
While Gary Smith spoke with Arden Davis of Idaho Power Company several weeks
ago about the possibility of power outages this summer, he has not yet received
written information from him. We hope to provide written information to Council by
the June 19 meeting.
Recommendation: We will provide a recommendation after discussion at the
Council meeting June 19.
I apologize for the length of this memo. There is a fine line between being concise and
thorough.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 3
.f
[
(. :.
rf~2
AGREEMENT FOR:
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION I SEWER & WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
Locust Grove Road - Fairview to Ustick
ACHD Project N09 52185
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _ day of r 2001, by
and between the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, by and through its Board of
Commissioners hereinafter called DISTRICT, as first party, and the CITY OF
MERIDIANt a municipal corporation, by and through its Mayor and City Council
hereinafter called MERIDIAN as second party, both parties being a body politic and
corporate of the State of Idaho.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and MERIDIAN desire to undertake a joint effort to
share the tasks and costs of reconstructing Locust Grove between Fairview Avenue and
Ustick Road) including water and sanitary sewer installations as detailed in Project
Number 52185, hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACT.
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is willing to accommodate MERIDIAN'S request by
arranging for installation of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline as part of the
Project plans so long as the DISTRICT receives assurances that the DISTRICT will be
fully reimbursed for all costs and expenses it incurs as a result of additional work
attributed to the installation of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline within the
Project boundaries, including but not limited to, costs for changed conditions, plan
errors and omissions, and delays attributable to the water line or the sanitary sewer
pipeline design and installation.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, mutual
covenants and agreement herein containedl the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DISTRICT SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible for soliciting, receiving, and opening of bids and for
executing and administering the construction CONTRACT for the roadway
reconstructionf and sanitary sewer and water line installation work referenced
herein;
b. Provide MERIDIAN with a complete set of combined bid documents for the
roadway reconstruction, and for the sanitary sewer and water line installation
work referenced herein;
Page 1 of 4
(..M..: ...
(.......
:E.(~ z.
c. Furnish MERIDIAN with an abstract of all bids received, and obtain
MERIDIAN'S concurrence with DISTRICT'S recommendation for award of the
CONTRACT prior to making such award;
d. Make monthly progress payments and the final CONTRACT payment to the
Contractor in conformance with the terms of the construction CONTRACT;
e. Submit to MERIDIAN a copy of each Contractor progress payment estimate, as
such estimates are approved by DISTRICT, together with an invoice for
MERIDIAN'S share of the construction CONTRACT costs earned by and to be
paid to Contractor;
f~ Provide for the reference and replacement of all pre-existing survey monuments
within the work area;
g" Provide. the trench compaction testing for the sanitary sewer and water line
facilities from 1-foot above the pipe zone to sub-grade of the roadway section;
trench compaction testing shall be provided at the minimum frequency rate of
one (1) test per five hundred (500) lineal feet per foot of trench depth; provide
all re-testing required in any area that does not meet CONTRACT
requirements; and
h.. Provide the field survey and grade control necessary for construction of the
roadway. Centerline or offsets and stationing shall be established prior to
MERIDIAN staking sanitary sewer, manhole locations, and service lines~
2. MERIDIAN SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible to provide the inspection, field survey and grade
control required for the installation of all sanitary sewer and water facilities
installed under the CONTRACT and provide copies of appropriate tests and
diaries to the District Project Representative;
b. Provide DISTRICT with the construction plans, special provisionst and unit bid
quantities for the sanitary sewer and water facilities to be included in the bid
documents for the CONTRACT (all work required for the sanitary sewer and
water facilities to be performed in conformance with the 2000 Edition of the
Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and the City of
Meridian Standard Specifications and Drawings);
c. Remit to DISTRICT, within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
thereforeJ all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to the
approved final CONTRACT payment estimate;
Page 2 of 4
.J:~ z.
d. Remit to DISTRICT within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
thereforeJ all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to this
Agreement;
e~ Reimburse the DISTRICT. up to a maximum of $6fOOO~OO for all costs incurred
by the DISTRICT. inclUding overhead and benefits~ project administration,
compaction testing. and soils work required solely for the construction of the
sanitary sewer and water facilities; mobilization, traffic control, flagging, detours,
and weekly meetings shall be reimbursed on a prorated basis. The prorated
basis for the above items will be calculated using the percentage of the
MERIDIAN is project costs as they relate to the total project construction costs;
f. Be liable for the cost of repairing any trench failures attributable to failure of
sanitary sewer and water lines within the boundaries identified in the Contract,
and be liable for and indemnify the District for any and all costs and damages
resulting from any such trench failure; and
g. Reimburse District for any additional costs to District attributable to the
installation of sanitary sewer or to the removal of any or all items from the
Contract that are associated with the installation of sanitary sewer and water
pipelines~
3. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE THAT:
a. The CONTRACT amount for the sanitary sewer and water portion of the project
to be reimbursed to DISTRICT by MERIDIAN shall be based on the actual
quantities of work acceptably performed, and/or, installedJ as determined from
field measurements, and paid for pursuant to the unit, and/or lump sum prices
established in the Contract;
b. MERIDIAN1S approval will be required for any change order work involving the
sanitary sewer or water line installations;
c. Prior to commencement of work by the Contractor, the parties will, together with
the Contractort inspect the entire project for the purpose of reviewing the project
to locate and note any unstable areas and resolve any items of concern or
misu nd ersta nd i ng;
d. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof;
e. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, amended or altered except in
writing signed by both of the parties hereto;
Page 3 of4
:.;"
( . :
r~z.
f~ All signatories to this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the
power to execute this Agreement and to bind the agency they represent to the
terms of this Agreement;
g~ Should either party to this Agreement be required to commence legal action
against the other to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs
incurred in said action;
h. Any action at law, suit in equity, arbitration or judicial proceeding for the
enforcement of this Agreement shall be instituted only in the courts of the State
of Idaho, County of Ada; and
i. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the personal
representatives, heirs and assigns of the respective parties hereto~
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the day and year herein first written.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAN
By: By:
William J. Schweitzer, Director Robert D. Corriel Mayor
Date: Date:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Susan Slaughter, Senior Admin. Assistant William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk
Page 4 of 4
~.
(~<,.:'~... ... :~
(r"'~.... .
AGREEMENT FOR:
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION I SEWER & WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
Locust Grove Road - Fairview to Ustick
ACHD Project No. 52185
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _ day of , 2001, by
and between the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, by and through its Board of
Commissioners hereinafter called DISTRICT, as first partyt and the CITY OF
MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation, by and through its Mayor and City Council
hereinafter called MERIDIAN as second party, both parties being a body politic and
corporate of the State of Idaho.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and MERIDIAN desire to undertake a joint effort to
share the tasks and costs of reconstructing Locust Grove between Fairview Avenue and
Ustick Road, including water and sanitary sewer installations as detailed in Project
Number 52185, hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACT.
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is willing to accommodate MERIDIAN'S request by
arranging for installation of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline as part of the
Project plans so long as the DISTRICT receives assurances that the DISTRICT will be
fully reimbursed for all costs and expenses it incurs as a result of additional work
attributed to the installation of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline within the
Project boundaries, including but not limited to, costs for changed conditions, plan
errors and omissions, and delays attributable to the water line or the sanitary sewer
pipeline design and installation.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, mutual
covenants and agreement herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DISTRICT SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible for soliciting, receiving. and opening of bids and for
executing and administering the construction CONTRACT for the roadway
reconstruction, and sanitary sewer and water line installation work referenced
herein;
b. Provide MERIDIAN with a complete set of combined bid documents for the
roadway reconstruction, and for the sanitary sewer and water line installation
work referenced herein;
Page 1 of 4
c. Furnish MERIDIAN with an abstract of all bids received, and obtain
MERIDIAN'S concurrence with DISTRICT'S recommendation for award of the
CONTRACT prior to making such award;
d. Make monthly progress payments and the final CONTRACT payment to the
Contractor in conformance with the terms of the construction CONTRACT;
e. Submit to MERIDIAN a copy of each Contractor progress payment estimate, as
such estimates are approved by DISTRICT, together with an invoice for
MERIDIAN'S share of the construction CONTRACT costs earned by and to be
paid to Contractor;
f. Provide for the reference and replacement of all pre-existing survey monuments
within the work area;
g. Provide. the trench compaction testing for the sanitary sewer and water line
facilities from 1-foot above the pipe zone to sub-grade of the roadway section;
trench compaction testing shall be provided at the minimum frequency rate of
one (1) test per five hundred (500) lineal feet per foot of trench depth; provide
all re-testing required in any area that does not meet CONTRACT
requirements; and
h. Provide the field survey and grade control necessary for construction of the
roadway. Centerline or offsets and stationing shall be established prior to
MERIDIAN staking sanitary sewer, manhole locations, and service lines.
2. MERIDIAN SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible to provide the inspection, field survey and grade
control required for the installation of all sanitary sewer and water facilities
installed under the CONTRACT and provide copies of appropriate tests and
diaries to the District Project Representative;
b. Provide DISTRICT with the construction planst special provisionsl and unit bid
quantities for the sanitary sewer and water facilities to be included in the bid
documents for the CONTRACT (all work required for the sanitary sewer and
water facilities to be performed in conformance with the 2000 Edition of the
Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and the City of
Meridian Standard Specifications and Drawings);
c. Remit to DISTRICT, within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible. pursuant to the
approved final CONTRACT payment estimate;
Page 2 of 4
(
d. Remit to DISTRICT within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to this
Agreement; .
e~ Reimburse the DISTRICT, up to a maximum of $6,000.00 for all costs incurred
by the DISTRICT, including overhead and benefits, project administration,
compaction testing, and soils work required solely for the construction of the
sanitary sewer and water facilities; mobilization, traffic control, flagging. detours,
and weekly meetings shall be reimbursed on a prorated basis. The prorated
basis for the above items will be calculated using the percentage of the
MERIDIAN'S project costs as they relate to the total project construction costs;
f. Be liable for the cost of repairing any trench failures attributable to failure of
sanitary sewer and water lines within the boundaries identified in the Contract,
and be liable for and indemnify the District for any and all costs and damages
resulting from any such trench failure; and
g~ Reimburse District for any additional costs to District attributable to the
installation of sanitary sewer or to the removal of any or all items from the
Contract that are associated with the installation of sanitary sewer and water
pipelines.
3. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE THAT:
a~ The CONTRACT amount for the sanitary sewer and water portion of the project
to be reimbursed to DISTRICT by MERIDIAN shall be based on the actual
quantities of work acceptably performed, and/or, installed, as determined from
field measurements, and paid for pursuant to the unit, and/or lump sum prices
established in the Contract;
b. MERIDIAN'S approval will be required for any change order work involving the
sanitary sewer or water line installations;
c. Prior to commencement of work by the Contractor, the parties will, together with
the Contractor, inspect the entire project for the purpose of reviewing the project
to locate and note any unstable areas and resolve any items of concern or
misu ndersta ndi ng;
d.. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof;
e. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, amended or altered except in
writing signed by both of the parties hereto;
Page 3 of 4
~?
t...
...~ ~ :. .. .. .
(" ..
f. All signatories to this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the
power to execute this Agreement and to bind the agency they represent to the
terms of this Agreement;
g. Should either party to this Agreement be required to commence legal action
against the other to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney.s fees and costs
incurred in said action;
h. Any action at law, suit in equity, arbitration or judicial proceeding for the
enforcement of this Agreement shall be instituted only in the courts of the State
of Idaho, County of Ada; and
L This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the personal
representatives, heirs and assigns of the respective parties hereto~
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the day and year herein first written~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
By:
By:
William J. Schweitzer, Director
Date:
ATTEST:
By:
By:
Susan Slaughter, Senior Admin. Assistant
Afpro~~" ~v.\I\t,ll ~ }l ~ I (J I
Page 4 of 4
~..J!
(..:......:....
(,::'" .
. .
City of Meridian ....... :.
Public Works Dept.~.
. .
To: Mayor and City Council
~t'J
From: Brad Watson, P~E~.
cc: File, Gary Smithf PE
Date: 06/15/01
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for June 19 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
June 19 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Councilrs consideration:
1 ) Wastewater Treatment Plant Water line Proiect - Chanae Order No.. 1. This project
included installation of a City water main loop around the W\NTP to provide fire
protection and process water for the new dewatering facility ~ Irminger Construction
was awarded the contract on March 27, 2001 by City Council. Change Order No.1
involves both additions and deletions to contract as listed on the attached change
order form. The net increase to the contract is $2,913.71 for an amended contract
total of $70,607.71.
Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order No.1 for the WWTP
Water Line Project in the amount $2,913.71 and authorize the Mayor to sign
and City Clerk to attest the contract
2)
Locust Grove Road. Fairview to Ustick - Aareement for Roadway ConstructionNVater
& Sewer ImDrovements. As you are likely aware, ACHD is planning to reconstruct
and widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road" The Public
Works Department retained the roadway engineer (JUB Engineers, approved by City
Council 2-27 -01) to design all water and sewer facilities remaining in Locust Grove
Road necessary to serve all properties along this area" The agreement with ACHD, a
copy of which is enclosed, provides that ACHD will include the water and sewer
improvements in their bid package and provide contract administration of the project.
The City entered into a similar agreement with ACHD for Fromthedeskot:..
the FrankJin RoadlMeridian Road Project several years
ago. The agreement states that the City of Meridian will
reimburse ACHD up to $6,000.00. The actual amount will
be on the proportionate share of the total project costs
Brad Watson, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 Ii Watertower Lent; Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887~ 1297 _
watsonb@ci.meridian.idus
(
(
that are attributable to the water and sewer improvements. A preliminary cost
estimate states that the water and sewer costs at approximately $194iOOO out of a
total project estimate of $1 ,950,000, or roughly 10%.
Recommended Council Action: Accept Ute Agreement for Roadway
Construction/Sevver & Water Line Improvements with Ada County Highway
District for construction contract administration in an amount not to exceed
$6,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
3) Biosolids Dewaterina Facility - Increase to Carollo EnaineersJ Professional Services
Aareement As detailed in the enclosed letter from Carollo Engineers, delays
associated with completion of the digester project, stabilization of the digestion
process after completion and inadequacy of the water supply system to operate the
dewatering facility f start-up and performance testing of the system has been delayed
and prolonged.. Carollo Engineers is requesting an increase to the construction
services portion of their agreement in the amount of $7,100.00. As outlined in their
letter~ the total construction services portion of the agreement would increase from
$45,324 to $52f424K The Public Works Department agrees with their assessment of
the situation and recommends amending their agreement. Carollo Engineers has
provided the City with excellent service throughout the course of this project.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Agreement Amendment with
Carollo Engineers for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility increasing the
construction services task order amount from $45,324 to $52,424 and authorize
the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
4) Water and Wastewater Deoartments - Diesel Fuel Delivery & Storace Eauioment
leasing Proaram. As mentioned at the May 18 City Council meeting, the Water and
Wastewater Departments have been working with their normal fuel supplier, Brico of
Idaho, to provide a fuel delivery truck and storage trailer this summer.. The purpose of
this program is to provide fuel for the emergency generators at four wells, the three
units at the V\NVTP and the trailer-mounted unit for lift stations. The equipment would
be stored at the WWTP with the storage trailer being in one the sludge drying beds
(to provide secondary containment).
The cost for the fuel delivery truck is $1 DO/day and the storage trailer would be
$750/month. Assuming a lease period of July 1 through September 30, the total
lease amount would be $9.200 for the delivery truck and $2,250 for the storage trailer~
A copy of a lease agreement is enclosed and has been sent to the City Attorney's
office for review ~
Recommendation: The Public Works, Water and Wastewater Deparbnents
recommend that the lease agreement be executed for both the fuel delivery
truck and the storage trailer. If the Council wishes to reduce the expenditure,
we feel that at least having the fuel delivery truck on standby at the WWTP is
appropriate.
5) Lease Aoreement For Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19.. This item
was previously presented to Council at the May 18 meeting at which Council directed
us to gather more infonnation. Specificany. we were instructed to: 1) work with
. Page 2
(
(
Western States, the low bidder, on negotiating a month-by-month lease rather the
weekly lease amount originally solicited1 and 2) obtain written information from Idaho
Power Company as to the likelihood of blackouts this summer~
Western States offered a modified lease price of $2t300/month compared to the
$575/week originally submitted~ Assuming a 31-day month, the monthly lease would
save about $250/month ($21546 vs. $2,300).
While Gary Smith spoke with Arden Davis of Idaho Power Company several weeks
ago about the possibility of power outages this summer, he has not yet received
written infonnation from him~ We hope to provide written information to Council by
the June 19 meeting.
Recommendation: We will provide a recommendation after discussion at the
Council meeting June 19.
I apologize for the length of this memo. There is a fine line between being concise and
thorough.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 3
(r'....:.
I ~RI7~eL~rq
rr~3
I )(lll if 1(1/ (~(' ( () (I J.{'U I i rr(,~
'l~.'{J)(Jt{.~i i~(~~ (/li(l I illl t'''{)/'l t i()II.~+
~ /i ". Iii ().-;r' l (~C I~(' 1~1.1('.
./\ ~~~ :J
I .~. ~.~
2001
April 1 Of 2001
Brad Watson
City of Meridian
200 E~ Carlton, Suite 1 00
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: Biosolids Dewatering Project
Dear Brad:
As you know, the schedule for Final Completion of the subject project has been extended
longer than originally anticipated, due to construction issues out of the control of the City, or
Carollo Engineers~ The dewatering project was originally supposed to be completed by
Turn-Key on, or around April 1, 2000.. Due to a change order and some equipment-related
delays, the project was substantially completed approximately one month Jate" However,
final performance testing of the centrifuges and closeout of the contract require completion
of the City's new digester and stabilization of the biosolids, so that the testing is done using
a consistent feed source.
The performance testing has not yet been completed and has been delayed approximately
one year to date. However, the City's digester process has recently stabilized, and the
performance test can now be run. Per John Shawcroft, the plant's potable water system will
be upgraded within 60 days, and this may further enhance the polymer and centrifuge
systems' performance~ Therefore, we recommend scheduling the performance testing with
Turn-Key and Andrtiz shortly after the water system upgrade is completed..
Our budget for engineering services during construction was $45,324..00" We used the
remainder of this budget last spring, during startup of the centrifuge~ Startup of the
equipment took longer than anticipated because the biosolids quality was inadequate (due
to de~stabilization of the digester process) and because the digester electrical and control
system was not completed and de-bugged.. Start-up of the centrifuge was also delayed
because the contractor failed to adequately start-up and test the ancillary equipment (such
as the diverter gate, polymer system~ flow meter, etc,,) prior to arrival of the Andritz
representative on-site.
Since our last invoice in July, we have used approximately $1 ,900..00 additional budget,
which primarily includes my time at Keller Associates for attending meetings with the
digester project team, assisting treatment plant staff with additional startup issues,
preparation of payment requests, and management of warranty repair work.
12592 WEST EXPLORER DRIVE. SUITE 200 II BOJSE. JDAHO 83713. (20B) 37602288 · FAX (208) 376~2251
Brad Watson
City of Meridian
April 1 0, 2001
Page 2
(,.... ...
c....:-..
:Z:~3
To finish the project, we anticipate that approximately 40 additional hours will be required to
supervise, evaluateJ and certify the performance testing of the centrifuge, complete the
record drawings, and submit project closeout documents to the City and to DEQ" Therefore,
we are requesting an extension of our contract in the amount of $1 J900 for services
completed to date, plus $5,200 for the remainder of our services on the project.. This will
increase the total construction engineering service contract to $52,424.00~ or approximately
40/0 of construction.
If this is acceptable to the City, we can prepare an additional task order (Task Order 4) and
submit to you for signatures, or we can simply send additional invoices, following a Jetter of
authorization from the City.
Please Jet us know how you would like to proceed, and do not hesitate to call if you have
any questions, or comments regarding our services or anticipated schedule.
Sincerely,
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, P.C.
r
12.~~~
Tim Tekippe
TT:crb
cc: Patrick White
Project No..: 4504a.20
G:\ARCHIVE\M EA rD IAN\4 504A.20\4 1 001. DOC
~ dJ
c.... .
("
. .
City of Meridian:. .. ...
Public Works Dept..
To: Mayor and City Council
~V
From: Brad Watson, P,E,
CC: File, Gary Smith, PE
Date: 06/15/01
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for June 19 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
June 19 City Council agenda. under Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) Wastewater Treatment Plant Water line Proiect - Chanae Order No.1.. This project
included installation of a City water main loop around the VWVTP to provide fire
protection and process water for the new dewatering facility. Inninger Construction
was awarded the contract on March 27, 2001 by City Council. Change Order NO.1
involves both additions and deletions to contract as listed on the attached change
order form. The net increase to the contract is $2,913,71 for an amended contract
total of $70,607~71.
Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order No.1 for the WWTP
Water Line Project in the amount $2,913.71 and authorize the Mayor to sign
and City Clerk to attest the contract
2)
Locust Grove Roadt Fairview to Ustick - Aareement for Roadwav ConstructionMlater
& Sewer ImlJrovements. As you are likely aware, ACHD is planning to reconstruct
and widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road. The Public
Works Department retained the roadway engineer (JUS Engineers, approved by City
Council 2-27 -01) to design all water and sewer facilities remaining in Locust Grove
Road necessary to serve all properties along this area. The agreement wnh ACHD, a
copy of which is enclosed, provides that ACHD will include the water and sewer
improvements in their bid package and provide contract administration of the project.
The City entered into a similar agreement with ACHD for From the desk ot:..
the FrankJin RoadlMeridian Road Project several years
ago. The agreement states that the City of Meridian will
reimburse ACHD up to $6,000.00. The actual amount will
be on the proportionate share of the total project costs
Bnd Watsoo, P.E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 R Watcrtower Lane, Suite 200
Meri~ Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 89S-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
watsonl@cLmeridian.idus
\..<: .
/ .
1 : .
\: ...
that are attributable to the water and sewer improvements. A preliminary cost
estimate states that the water and sewer costs at approximately $194~OOO out of a
total project estimate of $1 ,950fOOO, or roughly 10%.
Recommended Council Action: Accept the Agreement for Roadway
Construction/Sewer & Water Line Improvements with Ada County Highway
District for construction contract administration in an amount not to exceed
$6,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
3) BiosoHds Dewaterina Facility - Increase to Carollo Enqineers' Professional Services
Aoreement. As detailed in the enclosed letter from Carollo Engineers, delays
associated with completion of the digester project, stabilization of the digestion
process after completion and inadequacy of the water supply system to operate the
dewatering facility f start-up and performance testing of the system has been delayed
and prolonged.. Carollo Engineers is requesting an increase to the construction
services portion of their agreement in the amount of $71100.00. As outlined in their
letter, the total construction services portion of the agreement would increase from
$45,324 to $52,424. The Public Works Department agrees with their assessment of
the situation and recommends amending their agreement. Carollo Engineers has
provided the City with excellent service throughout the course of this project
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Agreement Amendment with
Carollo Engineers for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility increasing the
construction services task order amount from $45,324 to $52,424 and authorize
the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
4) Water and Wastewater Departments - Diesel Fuel Delivery & Storace Eauioment
Leasing Proqram. As mentioned at the May 18 City Council meeting, the Water and
Wastewater Departments have been working with their normal fuel supplier, Brico of
Idaho, to provide a fuel delivery truck and storage trailer this summer. The purpose of
this program is to provide fuel for the emergency generators at four wells, the three
units at the WWTP and the trailer-mounted unit for lift stations. The equipment would
be stored at the WVVTP with the storage trailer being in one the sludge drying beds
(to provide secondary containment)~
The cost for the fuel delivery truck is $100/day and the storage trailer would be
$750/month. Assuming a lease period of July 1 through September 30, the total
lease amount would be $9,200 for the delivery truck and $2,250 for the storage trailer..
A copy of a lease agreement is enclosed and has been sent to the City AttomeyJs
office for review.
Recommendation: The Public Works, Water and Wastewater Deparbnents
recommend that the lease agreement be executed for both the fuel delivery
truck and the storage trailer. If the Council wishes to reduce the expenditure,
we feel that at least having the fuel delivery truck on standby at the WWTP is
appropriate.
5) Lease Aoreement For Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19.. This item
was previously presented to Council at the May 18 meeting at which Council directed
us to gather more infonnation. Specifically, we were instructed to: 1) work with
. Page 2
f.
.ri.... .
Western States, the low bidder, on negotiating a month-by-month lease rather the
weekly lease amount originally solicited, and 2) obtain written information from Idaho
Power Company as to the likelihood of blackouts this summer.
Western States offered a modified lease price of $2,300/month compared to the
$575/week originally submitted. Assuming a 31-day month, the monthly lease would
save about $250/month ($2,546 VS~ $2,300)~
While Gary Smith spoke with Arden Davis of Idaho Power Company several weeks
ago about the possibility of power outages this summer, he has not yet received
written information from him.. We hope to provide written information to Council by
the June 19 meeting.
Recommendation: We will provide a recommendation after discussion at the
Council meeting June 19.
I apologize for the length of this memo~ There is a fine line between being concise and
thorough.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 3
I~4
LEASE AGREEMENT
BriCo of Idaho, Inc~ agrees to lease to the City of Meridian one fuel delivery tank wagon truck and one
5600 gallon storage trailer~ The tenn of the lease will be from June 18, 2001 until September 30, 200 I.
The following conditions will apply:
1. The City of Meridian will lease .from BriCa of Idaho the above mentioned equipment, and
keep on site at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), at the rate of:
a. fuel delivery tank wagon truck at $100.00 per day.
b. 5600 gallon storage trailer $750.00 per month; partial months will be prorated according
to the number of days the storage trailer is physically on-site at the WWTP~
c. terms on paymen.t will be net 30 day.
:BriCo will deliver the leased equipment to the City of Meridian Wastewater Treatment Plant,
340 1 N.orth Ten Mile Road, on or before the day when the lease commences.
2. The City of Meridian will allow only a qualified driver with a Class B Commercial Drivers
.L.icense with Hazardous and Tank Endorsements to drive the fuel delivery tank wagon truck.
3. The City of Meridian will provide maintenance for the leased equipment for term of lease.
BriCo will provide, upon delivery of the equipment, a written documentation detailing
maintenance requirements, procedures and materials.
4. BriCo of Idaho at the end of this Lease Agreement will purchase back the unused fuel from
the City of Meridian at the rack price of the day returned (rack price will be
provided to the City of Meridian by BriCo of Idaho).
5. The City of Meridian will be responsible for the clean-up of any spills of product from any
piece of equipment contained in this lease for the term of this lease~
6. BriCo of Idaho will satisfy an comp.liance testing on equipment before lease goes into effect.
7. BriCo of Idaho will also maintain insurance on the leased equipment and provide a copy of
the Certificate oflnsurance to the City of Meridian upon delivery of the equipment.
8~ .BriCo of Idaho will indemnitY and hold harmless, to the fullest extent pennitted by law, the
City of Mer.idian and its employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses
including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from the use of the
lease equipment, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or
in part by any negligent act or omission ofBriCo of Idaho, its subcontractor(s), anyone
directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be
I iable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
9. During the tenn of the lease, the City of Meridian will have the right to refuse any request of
BriCo of Idaho to borrow or otherwise take the leased equipment off-site. If the City of
Meridian grants BriCo ofIdaho's request to borrow any of the leased equipment, and while
I/~4
the leased equip.ment is in BriCo of Idaho's possession an emergency occurs wherein the City
of Meridian requires immediate use of the leased equipment, BriCo of Idaho will provide the
leased equipment, or equivalent equipment, to the City of Meridian WWTP within two (2)
hours of the City's verbal request.. Liquidated damages in the amount of $250 per hour
beyond th.e two-hour requisition period will be deducted from any lease payment due to BriCo
of Idaho.
lO~ The City of Meridian may terminate the lease upon fourteen (14) days written notice to BriCo
ofldaho~ The written termination notice will contain the last day the City of.Meridian
requires the leased equipment to be at the WWTP. BriCo of Idaho will remove the leased
equipment from the City's property within seven days of the noticed lease termination date.
Payment will not be made to BriCa of Idaho for any days or time beyond the .Iease
term.ination date the equipment is at the WWTP.
City of Meridian, Idaho
By:
Attest:
Robert D. Corrie, Mayor
William G~ Berg, Jr", City Clerk
Approved by City Council:
:BriCo of Idaho, Inc.
By:
Attest:
(signature)
(sign ature)
Name: Doug Maestas
(printed)
Name:
(printed)
Titl e
" ~
" ~
" ;";
(....::.:.:....:
(:::.:. .. ..
"" "
City of Meridian". ..
Public Works Dept.
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Watson, P.E.
CC: File, Gary Smith) PE
Date: 06/15/01
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for June 19 City Council Meeting
~v
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be placed on the
June 19 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Council's consideration:
1) Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Line Proiect - Change Order No.1. This project
included installation of a City water main loop around the WWTP to provide fire
protection and process water for the new dewatering facility. Irminger Construction
was awarded the contract on March 27, 2001 by City Council. Change Order No~ 1
involves both additions and deletions to contract as listed on the attached change
order form. The net increase to the contract is $2,913.71 for an amended contract
total of $70t607.71.
Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order No.1 for the wwrp
Water Line Project in the amount $2,913.71 and authorize the Mayor to sign
and City Clerk to attest the contract
2)
Locust Grove Road~ Fairviewto Ustick-Aareement for Roadwav ConstructionNVater
& Sewer Improvements~ As you are likely aware, ACHD is planning to reconstruct
and widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road~ The Public
Works Department retained the roadway engineer (JUB Engineers, approved by City
Council 2-27 -01) to design all water and sewer facilities remaining in Locust Grove
Road necessary to serve all properties along this area. The agreement with ACHD, a
copy of which is encJosedf provides that ACHD will include the water and sewer
improvements in their bid package and provide contract administration of the project
The City entered into a similar agreement with ACHD for From dte desk of..
the Franklin RoadlMeridian Road Project several years
ago~ The agreement states that the City of Meridian will
reimburse ACHD up to $6,000.00. The actual amount will
be on the proportionate share of the total project costs
"Brad \Vatson, P~E.
City Engineer
Meridian Public Works Department
660 E. Watertower Lanf; Suite 200
Meridian, Idaho 83642
. Page 1
(208) 898-5500
Fax: (208) 887-1297
watson b@lci .meridian.idus
(
(.
that are attributable to the water and sewer improvements.. A preliminary cost
estimate states that the water and sewer costs at approximately $194,000 out of a
total project estimate of $1 ,950,000, or roughly 10%.
Recommended Council Action: Accept the Agreement for Roadway
Construction/Sewer & Water Line Improvements with Ada County Highway
District for construction contract administration in an amount not to exceed
$6,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
3) Biosolids Dewatering Facility - Increase to Carollo Engineers' Professional Services
Agreement As detailed in the enclosed letter from Carollo EngineersJ delays
associated with completion of the digester project, stabilization of the digestion
process after completion and inadequacy of the water supply system to operate the
dewatering facility, start-up and performance testing of the system has been delayed
and prolonged~ Carollo Engineers is requesting an increase to the construction
selVices portion of their agreement in the amount of $7,100.00. As outlined in their
letter, the total construction services portion of the agreement would increase from
$45,324 to $52,424. The Public Works Department agrees with their assessment of
the situation and recommends amending their agreement. Carollo Engineers has
provided the City with excellent service throughout the course of this project.
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Agreement Amendment with
Carollo Engineers for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility increasing the
construction services task order amount from $45,324 to $52,424 and authorize
the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the agreement
4) Water and Wastewater Departments - Diesel Fuel Delivery & StoraQe Eauipment
Leasing Proaram. As mentioned at the May 18 City Council meeting, the Water and
Wastewater Departments have been working with their normal fuel supplier, Brico of
Idaho, to provide a fuel delivery truck and storage trailer this summer. The purpose of
this program is to provide fuel for the emergency generators at four wells, the three
units at the WWTP and the trailer-mounted unit for lift stations. The equipment would
be stored at the WWTP with the storage trailer being in one the sludge drying beds
(to provide secondary containment).
The cost for the fuel delivery truck is $1 DO/day and the storage trailer would be
$750/month~ Assuming a lease period of July 1 through September 30, the total
lease amount would be $9 J200 for the delivery truck and $2,250 for the storage trailer.
A copy of a lease agreement is enclosed and has been sent to the City AttomeyJs
office for review.
Recommendation: The Public Works, Water and Wastewater Departments
recommend that the lease agreement be executed for both the fuel delivery
truck and the storage trailer. If the Council wishes to reduce the expenditure,
we feel that at least having the fuel delivery truck on standby at the WWTP is
appropriate.
5) Lease Agreement For Standby Generators at Wells No. 17 and No. 19. This item
was previously presented to Council at the May 18 meeting at which Council directed
us to gather more information. Specifically, we were instructed to: 1) work with
. Page 2
c.
("
Western States, the low bidder, on negotiating a month-by-month lease rather the
weekly lease amount originally solicitedf and 2) obtain written infonnation from Idaho
Power Company as to the likelihood of blackouts this summer~
Western States offered a modified lease price of $2,300/month compared to the
$575/week originally submitted. Assuming a 31-day month, the monthly lease would
save about $250/month ($2,546 vs. $2J300)~
While Gary Smith spoke with Arden Davis of Idaho Power Company several weeks
ago about the possibility of power outages this summerl he has not yet received
written information from him. We hope to provide written information to Council by
the June 19 meeting~
Recommendation: We will provide a recommendation after discussion at the
Council meeting June 19.
I apologize for the length of this memo. There is a fine line between being concise and
thorough.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
. Page 3
{:/n.. .
John Flaherty Construction
6002 Franklin Rd.~ Boise, 10 83709
: .. ~ .... .. ...~: . . ~ .. . . . ~ . ~ :.. . ~ :. ... ~.: . ..".. .:.. _:. : . . --.
June 18, 2001
/ \Yl J /J /1 ,i )!1...lft;{~. ,(;{/o It~
( C /IV"' r<;".v~
8EIVE
A TTN: Shelby
j i,J J 8 200.j
)F MERJDIAN
:LERK OFFICE
Mayor Robert Corrie
And City Council Members
Meridian City Hall
33 ~ast Idaho Street
Meridianl Idaho 832642
r-.ef 5~/;;;f<trtt. J::."E~.. 4~/.
r .t.? ~i. ~.. ~ } .#' 1/./ ~-p. ::.. . :.~
hl~ ~W.'V ,1...} {(.sf 5' r --' if .
~J- l.r-7-tft..,. V' ~.< ,
We are requesting that the Vc. hn
Flaherty Const. Jnc~ For Lot 38 Block 14 of the Thousand Springs
Sub~. 2421 E. Weir Creek Dr.
R espectfu lIy;
. .' ".:. ........ F. ~....:.--' .
Kyle Buzzell
Superintendent
John Flaherty
President
John Flaherty Construction Inc.,
1
b fo
[pJ ItA> ~ .1
· - Iv / ~ uti n{f ~
(ar ~~ r ~ rP {J [
GWL.~ ()#. jJ ~
~ fvliV vt ~
ct~ rvJ l JtYL 0
Q; r ,,..
S h"o
.f ~J )
2083455599 f PAGE. 02
./
JUN 18 '01 12:31
/
\.
(.
4650 North LiIld.er Rd.
Meridiall,ID 83642
884-8045 (Home)
373-0425 (Work)
Jtlne 3,2001
Meridian City Council
33 East Idaho Street
Meridiall,ID 83642
RECEIVED
JUN - 5 2001
CITY.OF MERIDIAN
RE: Traffic Concenls related to Proposed Bridgetower Crossillg SubdilJision
Dear Councihnen:
We understand that the Meridian City Council will .be hearing three itelllS related
to the proposed. Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision: I) request for aIUlexatioll and
zoning of 3 71.42 acres in proposed R..4 and C-6 zones, 2) request for Prelil11inary
Plat Approval of 336 building lots and 5 8 other lots on 17 5. 91 acres ill proposed
r-4 and C-6 zones north of Us tick Rd. and East ofTen Mile Rd.., and 3) Request
for Conditional Use Permit of 692 single-falnily lots, 59 tovvn hOlnes, 17 office
lots, alld 10 cOlnlnerciallots 011 370.55 acres ill proposed R...4 al1d C-G ZQlles. We
also nnderstalld that the item I will be heard dUrlllg the J Ulle 200 I City Council
nleeting.
We are worried about the effects that the proposed subdivision will have 011 the
existing road network, on which traffic is already heavy at times. We obtained
copies of the Bridgetower Crossillg Traffic Study as well as the draft overall traffic
stl1.dy of the six square miles in which Inajor developmellt is OCCUrrillg in Meridia.n.
On the basis of these public records, we prepared a letter to the Meridian Planning
and ZOlllllg Commission documenting our concerns. Below is all excerpt from
that letter regarding our traffic-related concerns. It is our hope that the Meridiall
City Council will consider these concenlS as you hear and contemplate the three
requests related to the Bridgetower Subdivisioll.
TRAFFIC CONCERNS
1. The Bridgetower Traffic Study aSSUlnes area traffic growth 110t associated
with the Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision to be 3-4 percent per year. This
is incOllsistent with other written records froIn Meridian City and the Ada
County Highway District (ACHD), that indicate this area is a high growth
area. Therefore, we request that the Bridgetower traffic study be revised to
include growth rates consistent with those used .by Meridian City and the
ACHD ill their plalll1ing documents..
2. The Bridgetower Traffic Study includes traffic surveys that were conducted
December 21, 22, and 26,2000.. We questioll whether traffic surveys
conducted so llear the Christmas holidays are representative of standard
traffic Volullles. III particular, we are cOllcenled that the Eagle Higll School
may llot have been ill session when the surveys were COlld.ucted. We
believe that high school traffic COllstitutes a significant percentage of daily
traffic using the existing road. lletwork, particularly during the morning rush
period. While the study's conclusion about the current Level of Service
(LOS) for the studied intersections may not challge, a revised traffic study
representative of traffic volumes during normal use lnay indicate mitigative
measures are required earlier in the life of this project~ Accordingly, we
request new traffic sUIVeys .be COllducted during periods of normal use and
the traffic plans revised as necessary ~
3. Based on the Bridgetower and ACHD Studies, tile illte-rsectiolls at the
corners of the square are operating at LOS "en or better dUrillg the peak
evening rush" ACHD has indicated that, barring unique circumstances as
fo.und with a shopping center, the evening rush hour is the benchmark used
to establish intersection LOS.. We suggest that Eagle High School traffic
COllstitute a special cirCUlnstance. 011 March 21 and 22, we observed as
In any as 22 soUthboulld vehicles liIled. up at the Lillder Road/McMillal1
Road intersection shortly after Eagle HS let out. The intersection had not
cleared before the next group of southbound cars (controlled by the light at
Linder Road/Chind.en Boulevard) arrived, suggesting the LOS at this time
was less thall "C.. " Therefore, we request that the Bridgetower traffic study
be required to predict the nloming peak LOS for those intersectiol1s
impacted by both commuter and high school traffic before the conditional
use permit is granted.
4. The Bridgetower Traffic Study does not luention the un.pact the
subdivision will have on surrounding intersections. For exalnple, the LiIlder
Road/ChiIlden Boulevard intersection currently operates at less than LOS C
dUril1g the moming peak when Eagle High School is ill session. The traffic
study indicates that up to 200 extra vehicles per hour will use this
intersection. The Bridgetower Subdivision Traffic Stud.y shOltld discuss the
impacts of the proposed subdivision on the LUlder/Chinden intersection
and other nearby intersections~
5 ~ We request the Zoning COlrunission require access to the elementary school
be, at least in part, from McMillall Road. As mentioned above, we believe
the impact of the subdivision aJ.ld school on the morning rush period has
("
(
not beell fully evaluated. We are concerned that the Lillder
Road/Subdivision intersection 'Will not provide an adequate level of service,
especially since current plans call for the Linder Road speed limit to renlail1
at 50 miles per hour. The City of Meridian and residents currendy living
adjacent to the proposed subdivisions (Note the March 14, 200 1 ACHD
comments did not address the t';future plan" associated with the conditional
use permit), have expressed a desire for an access road to the
subdivision/elementary school be provided froln McMillan Road to
facilitate traffic flow.
6~ The Draft ACHD study anticipates Inid-mile or third mile intersections to
help carry the traffic loads~ The reasons provided. by the developer for not
constructing access to McMillan Road from the subdivision are inco.nsistent
.with the ACHD study and. are without lnerit. Cut through traffic results
froln overloaded arterials a.nd an easy to use alternate route~ A north-south
connection through the subdivision could be designed to discourage cut
through traffic. The Northview example would not be applicable if the
roads through the subdivision were not laid in a straight line. If there were
an offset in the roads (and associated intersection controls), cut through
traffic would be slowed alld therefore discouraged" The current subdivision
traffic design places a hardship on the existing residel1ts of Lil1der, Usticl(
and Ten..Mile Roads. An additional subdivision access point on McMillall
Road is needed.
7 " We request that the Bridgetower Subdivisioll Traffic Study be revised,
finalized and certified by a traffic engineer as required by Idaho Code 54-
1215.3.
If you have any qllestions regardillg these conunents, please contact us at 884..
8045 (H) or 373~0425 (Brian's warl, #). We tharu( the City Council for their
tinle ~
Sillcerely,
L 2. {-' ~~>~.'.~.;,/!'
t.....J . .....or
! '* ~4./~' A
l .f . ....j. /" c. - '/
Brian L. Eng ish
Margaretha M.. English
(
(-
\"...:... .. .
RECEIVED
JUN 1 9 2001
CITY OF MERIDIPJ.N
DELINQUENCY FOR TURN
OFF SCHEDULED FOR 06/20/01
MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose
to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30
P.M. Tuesday, June 19,2001, before the Mayor and City
Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to
defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer
and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This
service will be discontinued on June 20, 2001, unless
payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who
wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash
delinquency?
(No response.)
MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal
or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth
Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even
though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The
amount of the turn-off list is $30,660.34.
(. . . i.
(
CITY OF MERlO IAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1
Standard Payment Customers J un 19,2001 03: 12pm
Current Period; 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not incruded
Customer4 Cust No = {<} 9900000
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
4.0552.1 ABBEY BEN 90. 21 62.60 27.61 04/25/2001 26.38 -
34~3240.2 ABBOTT, REBECCA 199. 12 134~ 70 64.42 04/25/2001 1 06~38 ~
4.0868.2 ABLE. MICHAEL 107.61 72.56 35~05 05/08/2001 2a~ 76 ~
74~0871.1 ADA COUNTY FARM BUREAU 153~90 71.28 82~62 12/11/2000 21.06 -
5.0812.1 ADAMS, ROBERT & SUSAN 1a4~74 131. 77 52~97 05/04/2001 40r25 - none
51~1148~1 ADVANCED HEATING 1 07.76 23.36 16~88 16.88 50.64 1211512000 16.88 -
51 . 1152~ 1 ADVANCED HEATING 1 07.76 23.36 16~8a 16.88 50464 12/15/2000 16.88 -
31 .3408.1 AGUIRRE~ J EANNA 59~31 36.55 22r76 04/04/2001 79.14 - none
15.0060.2 AHERN1ROXANNE 1 04.58 69.31 35.27 04/06/2001 71 ~91 ..
1.1360~ 1 AKERS,GENEVA 262.65 182.89 79.76 04/17/2001 239.56 - none
46~4612.1 ALBERTSONS WHOLESALE 543.66 227.54 147471 168~41 04/04/2001 147.71 - none
1.0130.1 AL1DJAN I, ARAS H 79.58 53~99 25~59 04/23/2001 23rOO - none
7442452.1 ALLEN~ RICHARD L. 96.49 56424 40.25 05/15/2001 44.08 ~ none
19.6556.2 AMAR. STEVE 89.14 524 76 36.38 04/18/2001 52. 76 ~
2.0888.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 85.29 58.91 26.38 04/23/2001 26.38 ... none
50.0352.1 ANDERSON, GORDON 1 00.39 41.75 5B~64 05/11/2001 48.52 - none
42.0352~ 1 ARCH IBALD ~ BENJAMIN 83.01 46~59 36~42 04/12/2001 32.59 - none
2.211 0.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 349.61 349461 1 0/16/2000 91400 .. none
34.3232r 1 ASHDOWN, DAVID 117 r33 85.89 31 .44 04/17/2001 26~38 - none
32.0518.2 A TKINSON ~ DALE 93.52 64. 76 28~ 76 04/12/2001 28~ 76 K
32.1562.2 BABBITT, BARBARA 77.02 40452 36.50 OS/21/2001 30~21 ~
74.3100.2 BABCOCK, J ULI E 55.22 28484 26.38 04/26/2001 26.38 -
51.0290.3 BAI LEY. PEGGY 83~45 4g~27 34.18 04/16/2001 42.39 -
5140694.1 BAILEY1 PEGGY 93~71 60.36 33.35 05/16/2001 30. 00 ~ none
3343696.1 BAITHAVANG, CHAREN 120.12 61.99 58r 13 04/26/2001 79.57 M none
3341862~3 BAKERt JOHN 69.78 49~27 20.51
2.2130.1 BALDW IN. PlxrE 84~O6 57 ~6B 26.38 04117/2001 51 ~37 ow none
4~ 1430~ 1 ~BARN EY. MARY R 157.39 120~97 36.42 OS/23/2001 2a~ 76 ~ none
50.1912.2 BARN HART tRICK g2~ 73 57.68 35.05 05/16/2001 32~5g ~
22.1740.2 BARN HART ~ RY AN 146.08 25.73 26.38 93.97 01/24/2001 62+ 12 -
4.2118.1 BARR. TIM & T AUNfA 203. 16 161 .68 41 ~4B 05/03/2001 36~42 .M none
1.211 0.1 BARROETABENA, PHYLLIS 125.20 95.98 29.22 05/1 8/2001 20~OO - none
21.2626r 1 BASAURI, ROBERT & DENA 139.31 1 05~49 33~a2 05/01/2001 28r 76 - none
31 .3060. 1 BASTIAN, DAVID 122.67 82.54 40.13 05/15/2001 40.00 - none
42.3010.1 BAUER, JEREMY 81 .22 48477 32.45 05/01/2001 28.76 - none
46~O258.1 BEAMGUARD t LISA 64.00 35.24 28.76 04/13/2001 2B~ 76 w none
35~0041 .2 BEAUDREAU~KATHRYN 80.43 45.30 35. 13 04/13/2001 26~38 ...
32.1412.1 BEECHER) CYNTHIA 86.58 53.91 32.67 05/09/2001 34.04 - none
22.2264.1 B ELD EN, DANNY & JANELLE 1604 72 82.29 78.43 04/18/2001 107.31 - none
14.4440.1 B ENCO INC 111.07 68.36 14.11 6~48 22.12 02112/2001 5.64 -
16.301 O~ 1 8ENCO INC 120~39 31 .25 26.38 26.38 36~38 03/08/2001 56.03 -
74.3172.2 BEN DER, E RIC& TREASA 94.61 52.91 41 .70 05/15/2001 43.07 -
33~2772.2 8 ENN ETT. GREG 131.59 73.34 58~25 05/15/2001 60485 -
19~6688~ 1 8ENNETT~ MASON 121.98 81.73 40~25 05/09/2001 76~ 1 0 - none
31 ~000842 B ERGLOFF t JOHN & CH RISTINA 284.11 200.81 83.30 04/06/2001 79+61 ..
50.4222.1 BETZOLD, ANTHONY 7 4~28 41.61 32~67 04/1 0/2001 54r 75 - none
69~O270.1 BEZEMER, LAWRENCE 52.76 26438 26.38 05/0412001 26.38 - none
74.3296.1 BJENAPFL~ ROB & CARMEN 89~94 47435 42.59 04/25/2001 69.01 - none
4.1834.1 BITONJ, MARK 145.74 1 09.46 36.28 05/15/2001 2B~ 76 ~ none
21.0 154~2 BITTICK~ BRIAN 89.04 56.37 32~67 OS/21/2001 34 ~ 04 -
2.2140~ 1 BLAI Rt WI LMA 112.93 74.23 38. 70 04/10/2001 30.00 - none
**- in Msg corumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
( (
CITY OF MERlO IAN Delinquent Account List.. council Page: 2
Standard Payment Customers Jun 19 J200 1 03: 13pm
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20rOO compared to Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Deli nq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
4.2200.1 BLA YE~ LUCREZIA 117 . 69 83~63 34.06 05/16/2001 29rOO - none
42.1134.1 BLAYNEYt KAREN 187 ~62 119.19 68.43 05/03/2001 55~57 - none
3342730.1 BLEAZARD. BARRETT 73.05 41.61 31 .44 OS/23/2001 26.38 .. none
6941354.1 BOB BROWN 94.86 64.65 30121 04/23/2001 26~38 - none
32~0770. 1 BOCKMANN, PAUL A 107.21 77414 30~O7 04/19/2001 26.38 .. none
51 ~O506.1 BOGGrSt CONN I E 77 . 36 4a~ 15 2g~21 05/16/2001 29~21 K none
22.1462.1 BOLEN. KELLY & LORI 107.61 73~65 33~96 04/11/2001 65.18 .. none
52~O246.1 BOLOfS PUB & EATERY 866.49 341.78 246.19 192.57 85.95 OS/21/2001 246~ 19 w none
72~O 164~ 1 BON FRISCO. LOUI E & JENN ELL 92.52 56~ 1 0 36~42 05/14/2001 36~42 - none
6B~0060~ 1 BOONEt RlCHARD 70.15 40~ 16 29.99 04/1712001 28. 76 ~ none
46.0468.1 BORCHARDT ~ KEVIN & TINA 96.86 51 ~59 45.27 04125/2001 71.91 - none
21.2124.3 BOUDREAU, YVETTE 131.47 57.60 31 .44 30~21 12~ 22 05/15/2001 100.00 -
32. 1372.2 BOYD, JAMES 85.63 46.67 38496 05/16/2001 34~04 -
74.3796.1 BRADLEY. CHRJSTOP HER 63.15 35.13 28~O2 05/0212001 35~OO - none
51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELJ 1 00. 11 71.13 28.98 04/25/2001 64~25 ..
20.1280.1 BRATT, GARY & DONNA 162.74 114.83 47.91 05/11/2001 54.34 - none
21 ~ 1 054.1 B RAUNSTEI NIB ERNARD & KARL 105415 68.73 36.42 05/0212001 36r42 - none
22.1330.2 BRrAN MAHANEY 1 90447 131.07 59.40 04/1 9/2001 55~57 -
1.3510.2 B RI NEGAR. E. E~ 84.06 57.68 26~38 04/12/2001 52. 76 -
19~4456.1 BROOKS FULLER HOMES 122~ 14 85~5B 36.56 05/24/2001 22.05 ,.. none
3.0388.1 B RUNTON ~ LE$LI E 153~ 12 118r07 35.05 04126/2001 32.59 - none
74.3226.1 BUCHSIEB~ GWEN DOL YN 79~ 15 35~ 19 43.96 05/01/2001 66.81 - none
19.6510.2 BURKETT~ MARK, BRYAN & CAS~ 152.55 1 08.00 44.55 05123/2001 43.00 -
32.0922.2 BURKHALTER, KURT 181 .50 37.03 34.18 98404 12~ 25
2.2722.1 BURKMANt JULIA 172.26 126. 73 45~53 05/14/2001 34.04 - none
69.0182.1 BURNS~ DONALD 72.28 31 ~ 14 41~14 04/25/2001 62.28 ~ none
2.4890.2 BURNS. EMMETT 155.09 106.21 48~8B OS/23/2001 28.76 -
34.1456.1 BURROUGHS, JEFF 113.53 59.39 54. 14 04/13/2001 94.89 - none
22.0804.2 BUTTERFI ELD ~ CHARLES 145.51 96.15 47.85 1.51 05/11/2001 47 r85 -
4~ 1392r 1 BYI NGTON t DARREN 97435 67.36 29.99 04/17/2001 28. 76 - none
47.0046~ 1 CAHILL. JON 76~ 74 45~30 31 ~44 05/03/2001 30.21 - none
14.4488.2 CAMPBELL SR, DOUGLAS T 93~67 66.29 14.60 12. 78 06/01/2001 146.36 ..
34.09gD~ 1 CAMPBELLt DOUGLAS 142~91 93~55 39.1 0 10.26 OS/29/2001 39.10 ~ none
4.1140~1 CAMPS ELL. MICHAEL 1 08403 72~84 35. 19 04/11/2001 82.84 - none
19~ 7186.2 CAMPS ELLt S H ELLI 122~ 49 69.59 34.18 184 72
22.1 050L 1 CANON t BILL & 8 ETSV 184.22 154.97 29.25 04/17/2001 78~37 - none
4.1796.1 CAPRAJ, JOHN & SARAH 160.61 125.06 35~55 05/09/2001 50~OO ~ none
65.3136.1 CARLEY, RUSSELL 124.49 62.41 62~O8 05/14/2001 53~ 1 9 .. none
21.28BOr 1 CARLSON, JOYCE 112~25 77.20 35.05 04/17/2001 32~5g · none
32.1592. 1 CARL YLE. KEITH CARL YL 58.28 35.24 23404 03/19/2001 32~OO - none
34~ 1 808.2 CARPENTER. DOUGLAS 113.92 65.04 48~88 04/25/2001 82~a4 -
22~ 1160.3 CARSON. JEFFERY & PAMELA 147.72 103.39 41.56 2.77 05/01/2001 1 0.00 ...
5.064041 CARTWRIGHT t DOUGLAS 160.92 123427 37.65 04/23/2001 36~42 .. none
50.21 08~ 1 CASELLAt GARY 60.47 32~86 27.61 05/11/2001 26.38 - none
50.0310.2 CASS, BRUCE C 131.42 6a~g5 62.47 05/15/2001 65.11 -
48.1610.1 CB FINANCJAL D EV. L.L. C. 626.93 440.54 186.39 06/07/2001 259 ~ 16 -
33.2620.1 CECIL, 00 ETTE 92.85 53.97 38.88 04/23/2001 65. 18 oM none
1 .O720~3 CHANDLER, ALLAN 79~ 14 52~ 76 26.38 04/17/2001 26.38 -
42~2582.1 CHAPMANt LORRl 147~13 97.02 50 ~ 11 04/26/2001 72.84 .. none
22.0848~ 1 CHAPMANr THOMAS 463. 12 1 g3~94 59.54 55.57 154~O7 02127/2001 50~OO - none
4~O496.1 CHARTE R$, TRAVIS 91 .20 5g~98 31 .22 04/24/2001 28.76 - none
21 .021 a~ 1 CHEN1 LILI & YIZE 130.17 83.29 26.38 20.50 06/14/2001 36~22 - none
15.0047~2 CHRISTENSEN, DA VI D 163.00 1 02.41 60~59 OS/22/2001 1 02455 -
19.1114.2 CHRISTIANSEN, LARRY 92.43 63.67 28~ 76 04/16/2001 2a~ 76 ..
34~ 1204.1 CHRISTOFFERSONt ANDREW 177~66 50.36 37.73 30421 59.36 06/05/2001 112~73 w none
*** in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
......
( (
CITY OF MERJO IAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3
Standard Payment Customers Jun 1 9,2001 03: 14pm
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02126/2001 Date Amount Msg
32.1278r 1 CHURCH~ LARRY 111 ~ 63 67~O5 44.58 05/15/2001 26.38 - none
40.0432.1 CLARKE. JOHN 93~45 45~58 47.87 05101/2001 71.91 .. none
5.0344~ 1 CLIFF t DWIGHT 125~aO 87 ~O4 38.76 04/18/2001 57.52 - none
34~0352. 2 CLIFF ~ MICHAEL 1 09.67 82.06 27 ~61 04117/2001 26~3a -
46~O252.2 CLUFF t JOSEPH 59.24 32r86 26.38 04/26/2001 26~38 -
52~0376. 1 eM co INC 1,571.04 337 r44 246. 72 246.72 740416 12/19/2000 199.92 -
34~O536.1 COATESt JOSEPH & DARLENE 111.18 67 ~36 43.82 05/14/2001 28.77 - none
40.0066.1 eaCH ELlJ TIM & ANGELIA 83~ 17 47.90 35.27 04/17/2001 64.25 - none
21 ~ 1766.1 COFFMAN, RI CK K+ 119~68 77.84 41 ~84 05/15/2001 41.70 - none
33~3566~ 1 COLLI ER~ RANI c. STJLES~ 69.36 39. 15 30.21 04/1 912001 11 .35 - none
51.4170.2 COLSONt HOWARD 74.84 40.66 34~ 18 04/19/2001 26.38 M
14.50184 1 CONNER, ANTHONY 86.28 57.52 28.76 04/19/2001 26.38 -
19.0138.1 CONRAD, ROSS 80.37 53~ 99 26.38 04/16/2001 52. 76 - none
50.026012 COOK, JOHN 93.52 32400 36.38 25.14 05/01/2001 27.00 -
69.2252~ 1 COOK, PETER 65.46 26~ 70 10.00 28.76 02/13/2001 95~42 - none
21 .2928~ 1 COOPER, CLINTON & CAMILLE 125.64 93405 32.45 .14 05/15/2001 32~45 - none
42.2992~ 1 COPE, TIMOTHY 79.48 45~44 34.04 04/20/2001 34~04 - none
50.4818~ 1 CORANDVIEW HOMES LLC 99~46 51.09 6.48 6448 35.41
21 .3094.2 CORPUSt LANCE & LAURl 77 ~ 69 51.31 26.38 04/23/2001 26~3B -
34.091 o~ 1 COX. FAYE GAIL 118~84 83.57 35.27 05/01/2001 26~3B .. none
19.033441 cox. MARGARET 87~51 58.75 28.76 05/15/2001 2B~ 76 w none
33. 359 2~ 1 CRADERt PAMELA 129~35 1 02.97 26.38 05/01/2001 1 05.52 - none
33.3634~ 1 CRAWFORDt GREG 59.36 39~ 15 20.21 05/01/2001 26.38 ~ none
33. 2376~2 CRONERtCHAD 1 06~ 74 66.91 39.83 05/1 012001 50. 00 ~
42.4070.1 CROSS, ARBY 84.91 54~92 29~99 05/15/2001 28.76 - none
31 ~3336.1 CRYERt JU 0 ITH 59.24 32~86 26~38 04/25/2001 26.38 .. none
5140998~ 1 CULVERt WALTER 398.49 74.57 50487 45~53 227.52 12/26/2000 43. 76 ~ none
3140830.2 DAIL Y, ROBERT 74.00 46.39 27~61 04/16/2001 46437 -
2~OO80.1 DALICE PLUMBI NG 86.52 60. 1 4 26.38 04/24/2001 26~38 - none
3545030.3 DARRAGH. CAROLYN 56.28 35.46 22~a2 05/09/2001 35~OO -
42~O346.2 DARRON STOUT 1 03.52 75.91 27 ~61 04/16/2001 64.25 -
1.391 o~ 1 DA vea SERVI CES INC. 392~O7 339.67 52~40 05/15/2001 1 82.59 - none
50~216B.1 DA VI DSON ~ DANJAL 81 ~66 48.99 32~67 04/17/2001 26.38 - none
2141820.1 DAVIS t MARK 86r58 55.14 31 .44 05/04/2001 30.21 .. none
6940704.1 DEN N ING. RICHARD & LORA 1 87.51 57.22 67.06 63.23 OS/22/2001 67.06 - none
32~ 1254~ 1 o ENN IS. LORI 61 .70 35.32 26~38 04/17/2001 52.76 ... none
52~ 1 083.1 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 325~62 298.08 27 ~54 12/19/2000 .88 - none
2.1610~1 DESILET. DENICE 91.73 70.54 21 r 19 04/17/2001 38.00 - none
4644724.1 DEVELOPERS D IVERSIFI EO 77r10 46~ 72 30.38
2~ 1960.1 DICKSON. DONALD M 147.34 95~ 70 51 . 64 04/1 8/2001 83.46 - none
50~O204.1 DIPAOLO, JONATHAN 86.47 47~O9 39~38 04/24/2001 91.46 - none
7 4~3g64.3 DONALDSON, MIKE 57 ~52 28~ 76 28~ 76 04/17/2001 28.76 -
31 ~O146.1 DORR. MARY LOUJS 60.47 34~O9 26~38 04/12/2001 26.38 - none
3140828.3 DOWNIEt JASON 0 90~32 68467 21 r65 OS/21/2001 40.00 -
33.4144.1 DOYLE, JEFFERY 65.46 42~ 70 22. 76 04/04/2001 26.38 ... none
20.1588.2 DREXLER. JOHN 162.99 73454 6.48 26438 56~59 01/22/ 2001 69.03 ~
5140698~2 OUEROCK~ WALTER 414.67 32~86 26.38 30~21 325422 04/1 0/2000 23.25 w
19~OO72~2 DUGGINS~ ROY & ALTHEA 113.45 79.27 34. 18
2.6g70~ 1 DULHANTY, TAMARA 1 07.04 75.46 31 .58 04/16/2001 26.38 - none
14.5004~2 DUNCAN, JEFF & MONIGUE 113~61 78.20 35.41 04/2412001 26.38 -
50.381 o~ 1 DUNNt ANDREW 59.24 32+86 26~38 04124/2001 26.38. ~ none
2~021 0.1 DUNN~ DONALD 167 ~ 76 117~17 50.59 04/17/2001 45.53 - none
34~Oa86.1 DUREN. ALLEN & KELLEY 155. 79 96.43 59436 04/2512001 106.38 - none
2~ 1170r2 o U RHAMt MICHAEL 300.48 197.86 102.62 04/16/2001 299 .11 -
31.2318.1 EAGLE, ROBERT 97.74 61.65 36~Og OS/23/2001 40.00 .. none
*** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Cust No
Name
2.1690~3 EBLEN ~ EARL
22~ 1140.2 ELLJOTT. JOE
4240392.2 ELLSWORTH. SARAH
64.0014.1 EM ERALD HOMES IN C
31.3062.2 EMERSON, DON
3.0428.2 EMMANUI L. MICHAEL
50.1238~ 1 ERHART ~ MILT
50~ 1236.3 ERHART. MILT
3.0502~ 1 ERJCKSON,LEIF & ANGELA
50~ 1354~2 ESTATE OF BESS lEMA TCHAM
2.0320.1 ESTEP1 NINA
51 .3034r 1 EXTE RIOR 8 UILD ING S UPPL Y
74.3614r 1 FACKRELL~ THOMAS
46.4996.2 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR
32.1156~ 1 F ARB ERt BRfAN & KIMBER
19.6502~1 FARNWORTHt WARREN
1.3670r 1 F ARRANDt $HELLI E
1.3660~ 1 FARRANDt SHELLIE
33.3678.1 FAYLORr MILFORD
4.1454.1 FJELDS, CHRYSTLE
7 440328~3 FISHELt GEORG E
32.0568.1 FISHER1 MEL VI N
48.2696~ 1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA
4a~2694~ 1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA
5. 0438~ 1 FORRESTERr VAN DYE
51.3078.3 FREEMAN, NICOLE
51.3226.1 FREIT ASJ DANIEL
31 .3050.1 FRENCH. DEBRA
74.2746r 1 FRENCH. JOHN & KATHY
69.0746~ 1 FRISCH~ KURT & KAREN
33.4258.1 FROSTROM, STEVE & TERRI
34~ 1176~ 1 FRY, LARRY
40.0028~ 1 FUHRMANt JAMES & DIANE
51 .0522. 1 FU H RMAN r KENT
32.0676.1 GAINOR, THOMAS & DIA
21 .3048.2 GARLICKt LEW IS
68.0118~1 GARNER~ JAMES & LORRIEANN
47.0072.1 GEHRING, AMY & SHANE
51~07B8.1 GENERATIONS PARK LLC
2+0B52~2 GI ESLERt ANGELA
34.0394. 1 GILBERTSON t KEVrN
16.3314.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES
35~0256.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES
35~0152.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES
65~0628.2 GLENN, ANTHONY
33~23B8~ 1 GLUCH, SCOTT
4.2160.2 GLUMM. 0 EN N IS
32.1528.1 GOJNS, RICHARD
2142790~ 1 GORRINGE~ B EN NY
31 ~3374~ 1 GOULDINGt PAULINE
50~3908~ 1 GRAHAM~ JOHN & KATHLEEN
34~3206~ 1 G RAYSON. DIANA
31 ~O 158~ 1 GRIFFJN. RICHARD & GAll
69.0206.3 GROVES~ CRAIG
42~2070.3 HADLEY1 BRENT
*** in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
(~:...:'
Delinquent Account List- counciJ
Standard Payment Customers
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Min imum of $ 20~OO compared to Delinquent Balance
Barance
184.66
203.33
133~ 16
118~04
158.65
130.83
1 83.40
138.19
1 09.50
73. 72
80.37
1 ,538. 70
62.44
525.09
112.97
98~ 74
86452
88498
174451
156.58
55.22
64.14
785.45
2~721~16
206.59
69.55
114.46
85~51
67~68
138~31
146~66
1 06~82
60~4 7
125~ 12
174.89
187.88
65~23
132.69
587 ~30
88.27
132.67
158r28
69r24
77.36
61~70
59.24
160~ 1 0
115.52
1 OB~45
134.32
60.75
82.75
126~ 74
75~46
146450
Non...O e I i n q
52.76
136.27
g5~65
40~66
96~ 71
96.65
54.47
2a~a4
75~46
42.84
53~99
674.17
33.68
157~47
73~B7
59.98
60. 14
61 .37
49.41
117~56
28484
35~32
594~66
1 t396.36
161.28
38.63
25.32
51 .31
31 .30
87.13
84.85
70.1 B
34~09
29455
72.78
157488
36.47
60.64
445.28
58~ 75
94~80
52.76
32r 86
34r09
32r86
137.52
59~31
75.24
36.55
35.46
70.62
40~ 19
98.63
04/3012001
26~38
67.06
37.51
34. 18
61 .94
34.18
45153
26~38
34~04
30~a8
26.38
644~38
28~ 76
134. 16
39. 1 0
38.76
26.38
27.61
41 ~ 70
39.02
26~38
28~B2
190.79
873.18
45~31
30.92
36~38
34.20
36.38
46.54
61 .81
36~64
26.38
38~98
42493
30.00
28.76
38.01
142~02
28.76
37.87
26.38
25.06
27.61
26.38
22~58
36~38
49~ 14
59.08
24.20
28.98
561 12
35~27
47~a7
03/31/2001
26.38
6~4B
37 rB 7
26.38
12g~53
144~51
34~04
451 ~62
26.38
4.64
30.21
34.04
34404
~76
26.38
6448
26.38
18.31
(.
02128/2001
Last Pmt
Date
79.14
04123/2001
04/17/2001
36. 72
04/12/2001
45453
56.59
03/23/2001
01/09/2001
04/1 0/2001
04f17/2001
04/23/2001
90.62
88.95
04/17/2001
OS/29/2001
04/24/2001
OS/21/2001
04/04/2001
04/04/2001
05/16/2001
OS/23/2001
05/01/2001
04/18/2001
05/15/2001
05/15/2001
04/06/2001
04/0212001
02115/2001
04/19/2001
04/26/2001
04/0212001
OS/23/2001
04f20/2001
04/11/2001
03/22/2001
OS/22/2001
06/07/2001
05/11/2001
03/09/2001
OS/2212001
04/12/2001
05/16/2001
02123/2001
02123/2001
49.36
26.38
26.38
25.14
52. 76
69.24
12.96
524 76
05/11/2001
04/24/2001
06/18/2001
01/18/2001
05/10/2001
04/18/2001
05118/2001
OS/22/2001
OS/23/2001
04/23/2001
05/16/2001
Page: 4
Jun 1 9,200 1 03:15pm
Last Pmt
Amount
Msg
77.60 -
32.59 -
86.38 -
96~57 ... none
123~20 -
75.74 - none
32.00 -
52.74 - none
2a~ 76 .. none
88.75 -
37.87 - none
57 +52 - none
26.38 ~ none
52. 76 ~ none
41.70 ... none
44.08 - none
44.96 ..
60400 .. none
497~ 19 - none
B73~ 18 - none
36~42 ... none
71.84 -
52~ 76 - none
60~OO ~ none
52.76 M none
87.35 .. none
35.00 ... none
64.25 .. none
26.38 -or none
71 .91 - none
50400 M none
139.82 -
31.22 - none
49.36 - none
75~ 11 -
28.00 -
38.96 ~ none
30.29 -
55.02 -
26.38 -
26.38 - none
25.00 -
55.26 ~ none
40.25 .. none
98.72 - none
1 0.00 - none
2849B ~ none
41~70 - none
37 ~87 -
37.87 -
( (
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5
Standard Payment Customers Jun 19.2001 03: 16pm
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to DeUnquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-DeUnq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
4.0934.1 HAFER. RUSSELL 138.02 28~ 76 1 09~26 01/12/2001 38.88 - none
50.1352~2 HAGOOD, JEFF 65. 73 40.66 25.07
32.1360~ 1 HAILEY, SEAN 65.39 37 ~ 78 27.61 04/12/2001 26.38 ... none
34.1820.2 HALL, 0 USTIN 145.12 95.48 49.64 04/25/2001 37.87 -
22.0924.1 HALL, KEVIN 155~ 19 106.05 49~ 14 05/04/2001 44~OB ~ none
3~0266. 1 HANEY,ROGER 97.77 65~ 18 32.59 05/01/2001 28~ 76 ~ none
33.427 4~ 1 HANSEN t ERIK 107.10 64.17 42.93 04/23/2001 83.63 - none
42.2356. 1 HARP t GREGORY 145.16 98.95 46.21 04/16/2001 90100 - none
34~O834.1 HARRIS, DERREK G 145. 79 1 00.12 45.67 04/16/2001 94~ag - none
31 ~2264.2 HARTLEY~ QUENTIN ROLAND 1 06. 15 61 ~85 44.30 04/24/2001 41.84 -
2. 5900~ 1 HARVEY ~ LISA M. 1 07.56 79~ 15 28.41 OS/22/2001 40.00 - none
31.3640~2 HA TFIELD ~ ROLLI N 140 r 98 1 05. 71 35.27 04/17/2001 37.21 -
31 ~3634~ 1 HA TFIELD ~ ROLLI N 80~ 15 51.31 28~a4 04117/2001 26.38 ~ none
21 .0480.1 HA VESt LOREN 86442 52.60 33~82 05/15/2001 32.59 ~ none
31 .3288.1 HAZELWORTH, MARY 59~24 32.86 26.38 05/01/2001 26.38 -or none
64.4058. 1 HEATON CQNSTRUCTlON 97.26 55~56 41.70 OS/21/2001 42.93 -
34.1702.1 HEDRlCKt WENDY 1 04.75 75~91 2B~84 04/1712001 26.38 - none
69.0388.1 HEEB,ROBERT 61.65 30.21 31 ~44 04/11/2001 26~38 - none
31 ~O248.1 HEUGHI NS. RUSS ELL S~ 80.71 45.44 35.27 04/25/2001 34.04 - none
3143454.2 HICKMANt JOHN & J ENN I FER 199~64 89.05 11 0.59 04/19/2001 94.44 -
32.0566~ 2 HICKS t BARBRA J 126.66 82.48 44.18 04/23/2001 52.76 ~
35.5D43~ 1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTlON 76.09 51.73 8~94 6~48 8.94 02113/2001 7.71 -
32~ 113641 H Ill, JOHN NY B9~04 56.37 32~67 04/2012001 34.04 - none
1 .0920~ 1 HOFFMAN, JON C 135.75 95.42 40.33 04/16/2001 37.87 M none
5.0722~ 1 HOLLEY ~ DA VI D 276.03 123499 87.53 64.51 06/07/2001 1 00.00 ~ none
42.2342~ 1 HOLMES, BRAD 148.34 1 04~26 32.59 11.49 05/01/2001 32.59 - none
50.1922~2 HOUSING OPP MGMNT SER 1 03.79 43.04 40~25 20r50 05/16/2001 60.00 -
33. 2652~ 1 HOWELL~ KATHLEEN 126.82 76~49 50.33 OS/23/2001 41470... none
15.0071 ~ 1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 120.87 120.87
34~2100.1 HUNT t RADELL 106r54 68.81 37 ~ 73 04/17/2001 30~21 ~ none
49~ 1148~ 1 IDAHO HEATING AND AIR 1.035.30 222~ 74 169.82 1 80 .17 462.57 12/04/2000 146.49 ...
49~O932.1 IDAHO PARKS & RECREATION 315.24 231.07 84~ 17 04/19/2001 84.17 .. none
4a~2840 .1 IOA- TRAN 4,684.90 1 ,282.20 1 t049440 1 ,003.90 1 ,349.40 03/15/2001 144.00 - none
32.1 090~ 1 IVERSON, GARY & SHEILA 101 ~O6 74468 26.38 04/1712001 52.76 ... none
52.0700.1 JABIL CIRCUIT 3, 737~O8 1 t594417 2.142.91 OS/21/2001 2,502~31 ..
52.0750.1 JABIL CrRCUIT 2,785.17 1 ~423.26 882.03 479.88 OS/21/2001 882.03 -
31 ~3256.1 JACOBt JANICE 1 06~ 15 58.16 47.99 04/17/2001 45.53 - none
65~3112~ 1 JACOBS t MARIE 72~g3 36.55 36~38 04/25/2001 52.62 - none
50~0098~ 1 JACOBS EN. MARJORIE M. 123.38 31.86 25~38 25.38 40~ 76 12/11/2000 83.64 .... none
31 ~Oa68r 1 JAKOMEIT, CON NIE L 67.85 39.01 28.84 04/17/2001 26.38 - none
33.0394r 1 JAMES COURT APTS 152.35 95.90 56.45 06/11/2001 67 .52 ~ none
33.0388.1 JAMES COURT APTS 80.48 46.72 33. 76 06/11/2001 33. 76 ~ none
3140516.1 JARRETT, SHARON 71 ~54 45.16 26.38 05/18/2001 26~38 - none
211 1 912. 1 JENKINS, DWIGHT 96.70 62.66 34.04 05/01/2001 71491 - none
32~ 1622.1 JENKINS, LELAND 83.17 46.67 36.50 04/1 012001 26~3B - none
21 ~2830.1 JESS EE, KEVI N 7 4~67 35.32 27.61 11.74 04/17/2001 40.00 - none
34~OO 15~ 1 JOHN WARDLE 343.44 285.12 5a~32 03/06/2001 56~89 ~
32~O616.2 JOHNSON r CONN lE JO 300.83 174.26 126~57 04/17/2001 1 83.80 w
42~3060~ 1 JOHNSONt MATHEW 70.43 39~O7 31.36 04/26/2001 28.76 w none
34.0390.2 JOHNSON. PETER 173.37 92.38 49~OO 31 ~99 05/11/2001 95.82 -
19.0098.1 JOHNSON. SAMUEL 154.96 108428 46.68 OS/23/2001 44.08 - none
50r4562.1 JOHNSON, STEVEN & CAROL 122.70 68~28 54.42 04/17/2001 41.70 M. none
5.0738.2 JOLLEY t CHAD & RACHELLE 118~50 89.66 28.84 04/13/2001 26.38 -
50.2354~ 1 JON ES t LARA 125~g4 67.44 58.50 05/02/2001 100.00 - none
33.3572~ 1 JORDAN~KATHY 79.20 47.76 31 ~44 04126/2001 30~21 - none
*** in Msg COlumn indicates no Nolice is to be sent
(
CITY OF MERlO IAN Delinquent Account List- council Page; 6
Standard Payment Customers Jun 19,2001 03:17pm
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinq uent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
50 .2002r 1 JORDAN, STEVEN 59.24 32.86 26.38 04/1 0/2001 26~38 - none
21 ~ 1058.2 JORGENS EN t ROBERT & TERI L \ 1 OB~42 79.86 28.56 OS/21/2001 25.00 ~
50~O156.2 JORGENSON t LOIS 64.00 35424 28. 76 04/16/2001 28r 76 -
32~O522.2 JU HASZ~ 0 ON C. 178~56 90403 70.02 18~51 04/24/2001 1 00.00 -
20.1932.1 JUSTICE, PAT 1 B9~06 141 ~21 47.85 05/14/2001 30.00 - none
42.1930~ 1 KEGAN, ROSE MARIE 8g~83 61.07 284 76 05/09/2001 28.76 - none
21.1 B26~ 1 KEITH LEY t ROBERT 76.30 47.54 28~ 76 04/26/2001 28.76 - none
21.2602~2 KEMNITZt HEINO 155.86 115.61 40.25 05/16/2001 36~42 -
42.1176.1 KHAMPHAY,VANASOUK 70.15 40.16 29.99 04/24/2001 69.01 - none
21.2090.1 KINGSTON, CHRISTI E 165.30 122.71 42~59 04/23/2001 32.59 - none
3.0024. 1 KINNEY. K1M1KO 170.06 114.55 55.51 05/15/2001 27.39 - none
441246.1 KJ ERST AD t BRIAN & STEPHAN I E 79.14 52.76 26.38 05/17/2001 27.61 - none
51.0466.1 KLIN Et B EVERL Y 95.59 32~a6 28. 76 28476 5~21 04/05/2001 35.00 .. none
42.2712~2 KNAPP, JR~ t JERRY 136~ 74 88.83 47~g1 05/14/2001 36~42 -
19.6642.1 KRENZ~ ROY 131.59 65.1 a 33~a2 32.59 03/23/2001 78.42 - none
22.0200.3 KROPP, FRED a8.65 43.34 45.31 04/17/2001 40.25 -
1946512.1 KRUGER. RYAN 117.87 78r99 38.88 05/09/2001 32~59 - none
72.0180.1 LACOMBEt NORMAN & DEANNA 134.23 7BrBO 55.43 04/26/2001 55~57 - none
1445048.2 LAIN ~ MARTIN 124.44 84. 19 40.25 05/0112001 40.25 -
3140214.1 LAMBRlGHT, ARTHUR 71.17 37~92 30.21 3.04 05/09/2001 30.21 M none
22~ 124442 LAMPKIS. LISA 1 DB. 72 72.36 36.36 04123/2001 41.70 ~
1.0890.1 LANTZt STAN 88.36 64r 11 24.25 05/15/2001 40400 - none
22~ 0 336 ~ 1 LARSON t CARl 99.67 70.91 28176 04/17/2001 56411 - none
2~4990~ 1 LAUFENBE RG, JIM & T AMMI E 212.17 111.02 51482 41.70 7.63 06/11/2001 150.00 .. none
51.0390.1 LAWSON~ MARY 72~22 40.54 31.68 OS/21/2001 34.06 - none
50.2428.1 LEONARD. DAMON 114~60 66.69 47.91 04/17/2001 40.25 - none
31 ~3354~ 1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 129.98 35.32 26.38 26.38 41.90 05/01/2001 50~OO ~ none
19.7480.1 LESLIE CONSTRUCTION 79~ 14 52. 76 26.38 05/14/2001 26.38 ~
34.2852.1 LEVELLt SUZANN E 255~32 220.33 34.99 05/01/2001 58.00 w none
34.1754.1 LIES ERMAN t DA VlD 151.77 112.95 38.82 05/02/2001 26.38 - none
50.2130.1 LIKES, J ENN I FER 73~O5 42.84 30.21 04/23/2001 26.38 - none
20~ 1638.1 LINK, THOMAS 119.10 85414 33.96 04/17/2001 65~ 18 - none
42~2520~ 1 LOCKYER~ JEFFERY 113.37 65.46 47~g1 04/11/2001 95.82 - none
32.060241 LOLLEY. JUDITH 135450 107.89 27.61 04/12/2001 63.25 - none
21.2012~ 1 LOW, CLINT & MELODY 64400 35.24 28~ 76 04/13/2001 28.76 - none
2. 0390~ 1 LUKE, DAN] EL 1 02~ 12 68.08 34~O4 05/14/2001 37.87 ~ none
2.4790.2 LUTZ. $HAUN & AMBER 91.20 62.44 28.76 04/16/2001 57.52 -
22.0790.1 MACKtROBERT 92~ 73 60~O6 32.67 05/15/2001 34.04 .. none
7 4~3504.1 MADDOX, DALLAS 172~38 47.99 41.84 45.53 37402 04/25/2001 20.00 ..
22.2630.1 MALLON CONSTRUTION 55. 77 32.86 16.43 6.48 04119/2001 6.48 -
42.2332~ 1 MARIN. JOSE 124.16 75. 16 49.00 04/10/2001 40.25 - none
34r 1472~ 1 MARKHAM, RON 75~43 42.76 32.67 04/23/2001 26.38 - none
21.1760~ 1 MARKLEt JAMES 151.38 97438 54.00 05/01/2001 34.04 - none
74.2640. 1 MARLETT, JIMMY & DIANA 162.69 88.11 74.58 04/12/2001 153.27 - none
50.1636.1 MARTELL. ERIC 195.54 45~54 31.68 31.68 86.64 01/0212001 35488 - none
2~2520~3 MARTIN. CRAIG 128.93 79.43 34~ 18 15.32
50~2176.1 MARTIN. JASON 98.21 59~ 11 3941 0 05/03/2001 37.87 - none
2.2280.1 MASLEN, JENNY 81.21 55.22 25499 05/16/2001 28.00 - none
34~ 1244~ 1 MATHESON, DA VJO 79.48 44.21 35~27 04/23/2001 30.21 - none
19.0186.1 MATTHEWS~ JERRY 86.28 57.52 28.76 05/08/2001 28.76 .. none
2~ 1470.1 MfJJ<W ELL~ MARGO 135409 97.44 37.65 04/2312001 32.59 - none
75.0502.1 MCALVAIN CONSTRUCTION 120~O6 20.01 17 .55 27 r3g 55~ 11
69.2258.3 MCCANDLESSt DOUG 64.90 36. 14 28. 76 04/17/2001 57.52 -
42~O440.4 MCCLOUD, RUTH 192~92 147.67 45.25 04/17/2001 20.42 -
21 ~2772.2 MCCLURE~ ANTHONY 64.00 35~24 28.76 OS/21/2001 28. 76 ~
.... in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
{ (""
l.
CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7
Standard Payment Customers Jun 19,2001 03:18pm
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimu m of $ 20.00 com pared to Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non..Delinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 0212812001 Date Amount Msg
1.0170.2 MCCURDY~ NATHAN 101 .20 62.44 38.76 04/23/2001 57.52 ..
31.0488.1 MCD1LL~ EDMUND 258.29 161 ~ 17 97~ 12 05/15/2001 1 OO~81 w none
31.0486.1 MCDill, EDMUND 307~49 210.37 97.12 05/15/2001 98.35 - none
74.0692.1 MCDILL~ JUAN IT A 204~50 99.72 99.72 5.06 05/15/2001 99. 72 ... none
7 4.0036r 1 MCDILL~ JUAN IT A 234~44 122~OO 11 O~93 1.51 05/15/2001 110.93 - none
74~0030r 1 MCDI LL, JUANJT A 241.40 140.45 1 00.95 05115/2001 102.32 - none
31 ~3474r 1 MCDONALD, SHAWN 76r 13 36.69 41.44 04/18/2001 56.64 - none
3.0314~2 MCDOUGALt MlKE 117.31 87.32 29.99 05/08/2001 36.42 -
2.207041 MCFADDENt ARTHUR L+ 166.50 129.86 36.64 05/1 0/2001 26.38 ... none
1 .0090.2 MCFADDEN~ CLEORA 93.66 62.44 31.22 05/15/2001 57.52 -
32.0230~ 1 MCFADDEN. LEONARD 141 .43 79~49 61 ~94 04/17/2001 53.19 - none
2.3660.1 MCFADDEN~ LEONARD 1 06~a6 55~6a 26.61 24.57 03/21/2001 50~OO .. none
68.0098.1 MCGIL VERY, BELl N DA 83.29 45~50 37~7g 05/14/2001 32~50 w none
50.2192.1 MCGREGOR, JASON 62~93 35~32 27.61 05/0212001 26.38 - none
31.0748.1 MCKINSEY1 WILLIAM H 11 O~51 70~ 18 40.33 05/11/2001 37.87 - none
46.0558.2 MCKNIGHT. DAN I EL 91.17 47.62 37.61 5.94 04/25/2001 51.07 -
31 .2192~2 MCMILLAN ~ VICKI 98~ 11 43.51 34.18 20~42
2.4500~ 1 MCNETT. DARREN 117 ~85 76.41 41.44 04/18/2001 60.42 - none
5.07a4~ 1 MCPEAKt MIKE & MARl E 140 ~ 43 95~26 45.17 05/10/2001 32.59 - none
69.2282.1 MEFFORD. CLIFFORD 172.92 1 oa~ 60 64~32 04/17/2001 178420 .. none
1.2730.1 MELLEN, AN GELA 157.07 116.77 40~30 OS/23/2001 25.00 - none
19.6604~ 1 MEL TON, MARSHAL 108.27 74.23 34~O4 05/15/2001 35.27 - none
2.1480.1 MERIDIAN SHEL TE RHOME 4 7 4~65 323.40 151.25 04/19/2001 134.38 .. none
52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 6t832.94 1 ,254L 16 302~82 51275r96 06/18/2001 1 ,000.00 - none
52.11 00.1 MERJDIAN SPEEDWAY 1 t714.06 197.38 34.04 11482.64 05/15/2001 34.04 w none
51.3780.1 MERRITT, JUDY 72.65 46.39 26.26 04/17/2001 26.50 .. none
21 ~O164.1 METCALF, CHAD 194. 71 135.57 59.14 04118/2001 11 O~94 ... none
21 rOO94.1 METIVJ ER. JAMES 21 O~ 12 26.99 1831 13 11129/2000 40~OO ~ none
50.0554.2 METZGER, M I CHELLE 81.50 46445 35~O5 04/1 8/2001 47.91 ..
20.0066~2 MEYER, BRADLEY 265.80 197429 68~51 05/04/2001 64.68 -
24203041 MEYERt VI RGIN IA 86.14 50~ 76 35.38 04/1 8/2001 46.14 - none
1947124.1 MEYE RS1 TROY & J IMI 126.31 86.65 39.66 04/24/2001 37 ~oo -
4.088841 MICHAEL CAMPBELL CONSTRU( 201 ~ 75 133.68 6B~07 04/1612001 54.12 - none
74~ 1032.1 MICHAELSON, B RADL Y C. 70~54 36.50 34~O4 05/01/2001 37.87 - none
74.3696.1 M1LLER1 GREGORY & ERICA 6a~g 1 31.30 37~61 04/25/2001 62.48 w
31.0538.2 MillER, ROBERT 119.36 83.95 35~41 04/12/2001 19.58 -
51.314641 MILLER~ S & S 65.39 37 ~ 78 27.61 04/12/2001 26~3a - none
32.1108.2 MILNER, BRIAN 96~ 14 69.76 26.38 05116/2001 30421 ...
46.0886.1 MINEGAR. JOHN 82.45 47.54 34.91 05/09/2001 28~ 76 - none
74.3108.2 MOGFORD, DWIGHT 87.55 32.53 55.02
19.1160.1 MOHR B UI LD ERS INC 79.14 52. 76 26~3B 04/17/2001 26.38 -
32.0816.1 MOORE. RICK T. 138.68 92.18 46.50 04/18/2001 71.91 - none
14.4430.2 MOORE. SCOTT & CHR1STY 1 03.92 71 ~33 32.59 05/16/2001 35.05 -
42r 17B4~ 1 MOORE, STEPHEN 77 ~81 43~ 99 33~B2 04/17/2001 32~59 - none
50r0746~3 MORRISON1 MICHAEL 96.82 68.95 27 ~8 7 06/15/2001 10.00 -
7 4.2666~ 1 MOSER, CAROLYN 120.03 59.40 60.63 04/1712001 99~65 ~ none
32.0888.1 MOSER, MATT 1 00 .11 61 ~29 38.82 04/17/2001 34~06 - none
3440500.1 MOURIT$EN, LA YN E 176.53 136~60 39.1 0 ~83 04/0212001 90.92 - none
7443216. 1 MU I Rt GRANT 135.07 77.99 57 ~ 08 04/24/2001 70 ~89 - none
40~OO64.2 MUNSONt CHARLES & ANITA 84~ 12 52r82 31.30 03/23/2001 75.74 ..
34.16B6~ 1 MURPHY, JACK 92~ 73 63~ 75 28.98 05/01/2001 26~3a - none
50.0262~ 1 MURRI t SCOTT 87.97 46.53 41.44 04/25/2001 58.23 w none
32.479041 NAMP NMERIDIAN J RR. DJSTRICl . 243.75 206.61 37114
3~O850.1 NAUMAN, ANDREW . 160.95 111 ~81 49.14 04/17/2001 44.08 - none
50.0196.2 NETTt PAMELA 65.39 37~78 27~61 05/03/2001 26.38 -
*** in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Cust No
Name
6g~226B.1 NEW LI FE CH RISTIAN CENTER
50.1358r 1 NIBLETT, DEL
31.3582~ 1 NIBLETT t DELB ERT
31.0726.1 NJTZ~ JASON
31 . 2262~ 1 NOLAN ~ ROBERT
50~ 1456.1 NORTHVJEW BUSI NESS CENTEF
50~ 1464.1 NORTHVIEW B US IN ESS CENTEF
50~ 1460.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF
65.3158.2 NOWLrN, ROB E RT
2.537041 DOOM. SHERRY
72~0258~ 1 OLDS1 TROY
4.09 14~ 1 OLSEN1 H. DEAN
69~2278.2 OUTHET. JOHN & J EN N I F ER
13.2094.2 OVERY, ROBBY
72~0268.1 OW EN. KEN N ETH
33.2320.2 OZUNA~ MARIO
2.255044 PACKt PAUL
65~314841 PAFFUMI. ANGIE
21.211442 PALMERt PAT
32.0638~2 PALMERt PAT
31~3280.1 PALMER. PAT
74.3152.3 PANTALEO, RAYMOND & BETTY
2~ 163041 PARKERt EVERETT
2.2490.2 PATTERSON~ DEENA L
51.0318~3 PAULEN1 BEN
51 ~07 4643 PERKINS, CHARLES
69.0214.1 PERRY, DAN & LORI
33~2308.1 PERRY t DIANNE
55.1500.1 PETRA JNC
15.0024.2 PETTI ER. SEAN
2.3732~3 PHAM~ KlMAN
42.3006.1 PHJLLI PSI DANA
15. 003642 PIERCE~ CHUCK SR~ & MARY
74.0400.1 PfERCE1 SHIELA
74~03g6.1 PIERCE, SHIELA
34~2832.1 PIN E STREET 0 EVELOPMENT
1 9.7400. 1 PIN NACLE HOMES
14.4446.2 PIOCION E~ JOS EPH
1.0316~ 1 PJPCO LLC
50.2034~2 PLANK, REBECCA
22.1344.1 PLOTT, JOHN
69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS
21 .2604.1 PORTER. RODN EY
21 ~0078.1 POTRIDGEt GAIL
50.2402.1 POWELL, RANDY
35.0398.2 POWERS, PAXTON
31.101 o~ 1 PRADOt RIGOBERTO
2.4930.3 PROCTOR, KRI$TI E
52.1006.1 RAFANELLI & NAHAS
52.1002.1 RAFANELLf & NAHAS
20~ 1952.1 RAMBO~ TIMOTHY
2.25BO~ 1 REED, DEBORAH
50.2390.2 REED , LORETTA
34.1792.1 REED~ PATRICtA
33r2644.1 RH EAO ~ ROBERT
..... in Msg cOlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
(F'...
Delinquent Account List... council
Standard Payment Customers
Current Period~ 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Barance
Balance
139.15
111 ~42
122.85
101 r90
115~55
391 .23
206~35
1.809.02
63.54
153r 16
74.23
92.43
71 ~05
293.37
57.52
223.59
184.32
90.39
74400
1 00.33
182~28
66.41
76. 14
36.38
59.24
81454
1 07.33
85.88
288.17
126.09
107.93
73.84
176.55
52.76
55.22
97.37
103.33
117 . 00
293.70
ao~ 71
149.99
96.28
101.43
1 05.71
117.50
99. 72
89.16
98482
209.22
1.600.48
174.90
132.19
196. 11
223.05
65~23
Non-Delinq
84495
60~ 18
77.13
66~21
69.01
143.25
155.85
460.24
36.69
1 06.26
36.50
63~67
42~29
74.23
28r 76
153. 78
84.51
51451
35424
59.25
gg~06
35.05
50.76
32~86
45~ 16
51 ~82
47.90
68. 72
83424
80.54
45~OB
120~9B
26.38
28.84
70~99
57~52
6a~36
1 06.04
46~67
96~07
61.10
81 .03
61 ~63
65~68
58.02
50~28
72~44
127.78
991.47
124~39
93~35
122.82
149r90
36.4 7
04/30/2001
54~20
51.24
45r 72
31 r44
46.54
129~25
50.50
324r54
26~85
46.90
37~73
28.76
28.76
36~50
28. 76
53.61
34~ 18
38~8B
38.76
41.08
83.22
31.36
25~38
36~38
26.38
36.38
55.51
37473
46~64
42~85
27 ~39
28. 76
55.57
26438
26438
26.38
29.99
34.18
53.02
34.04
53~ 92
35.18
20.40
44.08
51.82
41.70
38.88
26.38
81.44
397.61
50.51
38.84
73.29
73.15
28.76
03/31/2001
4~25
1184 73
225.61
37.87
16.20
65~63
.25
55476
15.82
14.46
53r02
211 ~40
('n.:.::.
02/28/2001
Last Pmt
Date
04/26/2001
04116/2001
04/16/2001
04/17/2001
04/16/2001
05/18/2001
05/18/2001
798.63 06/20/2000
04/1712001
OS/23/2001
04/26/2001
05/03/2001
05/01/2001
144~ 77 06/13/2001
05/11/2001
05/09/2001
04/16/2001
04/20/2001
05/14/2001
06/06/2001
05/03/2001
05/01/2001
05/17/2001
04/09/2001
04/25/2001
04/17/2001
04/17/2001
117 ~05
05/01/2001
OS/23/2001
05/15/2001
05/09/2001
05/15/2001
05/15/2001
04/17/2001
03/21/2001
81.62 01/19/2001
05f15/200 1
05/04/2001
04/23/2001
05/09/2001
05/16/2001
OS/29/2001
04/25/2001
04124/2001
05/15/2001
OS/29/2001
OS/29/2001
04/25/2001
04118/2001
05/03/2001
05/16/2001
05/16/2001
Page: 8
Jun 19,2001 03:19pm
Last Pmt
Amount
Msg
44~08 - none
51.24 - none
43~26 - none
BO~OO - none
40.25 - none
129.25 - none
166.90 .. none
69468 - none
40.00 -
37.87 - none
45.53 oM none
28.76 - none
2a~ 76 -
56.50 -
28.76 - none
70.00 -
40425 - none
67~52 M
33~OO -
1 OO~OO .. none
32.59 M
25.38 - none
52.76 ..
26~38 ..
62~ 76 .-
91 ~06 - none
26.00 ~ none
40.25 K
50.00 ...
32r59 ~ none
56.80 -
26.38 - none
26.38 .. none
34~04 << none
70~OO - none
50.64 -
34~04 ..
51.74 ~ none
69.40 - none
50~OO - none
40~25 - none
45.45 - none
45.53 -
32.59 - none
36.38 ~
85~27 .. none
397~61 - none
44.08 - none
56.01 .. none
57 ~02 -
57.02 - none
28.76 - none
(. (
CITY OF MERI DfAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9
Standard Payment Customers Jun 19.2001 03:20pm
Current Period~ 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non-Derinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
34.0786~ 1 RI LEY ~ MARK 194. 77 119.69 75.08 05/16/2001 57 ~49 ~ none
4241844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 122.53 71.19 51.34 04125/2001 73.33 - none
51.3300.1 ROB ERTS, DAVID 81 ~38 55~OO 26~38 04/17/2001 52.76 - none
35.0027. 1 ROBERTS, GARY 1 02.97 59.03 43.94 05/01/2001 40~25 -
32. 1304~5 ROBJSONt MARLEEN 1 OO~36 66.18 34~ 18
34.1982.1 RODRIGUEZ. RODGER 126. 78 82.62 44. 16 04/24/2001 41.70 - none
35~01 05.2 ROONEY. BRUCE & PAIGE 88.37 50450 37.87 05/14/2001 37~87 ~
32+0618.2 RORICK, RICHARD 79~58 55.42 24.16 03/13/2001 48.00 -
46.5020.1 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS 147.76 92.08 55~68
52. 1644.1 ROY ENTERPRISES LLC 428~O3 180.83 124.41 122. 79 03109/2001 124.41 - none
51 .31 98~ 1 RYKERt ANITA 42.91 42r91 04/19/2001 12.63 ... none
50~OOgO.1 SABAt VI RG INA 1 01.62 66435 35.27 04/17/2001 68~08 .. none
35.0309~2 SANCHEZ~ RICARDO & LORI 76~O7 41 ~89 34.18 04/19/2001 13~61 ..
74.3710.1 SANDOVAL, WALTER & MIREYA 130.67 28~84 26~3a 26.38 49.07 05/1 0/2001 27.00 -
51. 1129. 1 SANTEE CONSTRUCTJON 163r36 126.36 37.00 04120/2001 364.88 -
34.1 078~2 SAVELBERG. DOYLE 204.98 67.86 39~24 26438 71450 06/08/2001 150.00 -
2.5680.1 SAXTON, CORY 124.42 7 4~23 50.19 04/18/2001 71.91 ... none
22~ 1 068.2 SAXTONi SHELLY D 1 06 ~ 66 70~ 10 36~56 04/20/2001 28~ 76 ~
74.0382.2 SCHILDHAUER, YOULANDA B6~81 48.94 37.87 04/20/2001 26.38 ~
34.2122. 1 SCHMIDT, GLEN 147.05 1 07 ~36 39.69 OS/21/2001 50.00 .... none
34.2144.1 SCHRANK, THOMAS A 121 .34 71 .97 49.37 05/14/2001 38~OO - none
4Br 186041 SCHUCKS AUTO SUPPL Y 257.9a 135447 122.51 05/15/2001 122~51 - none
32. 0622~3 SCHUSTER, BILL & LES LI E 235.35 88.23 95~46 49.36 2~30 OS/21/2001 43.23 ...
65~31 08.1 SCOTT, DANNY 97 ~89 52.80 45~09 05/15/2001 38.80 - none
74.3198~ 1 SCOWN. JENNY LEE 73.51 32.37 41.14 05/01/2001 62.28 - none
3. 0676~ 1 SEeD ASSOCIATES INC 248. 12 174.35 73. 77 04/20/2001 1 07~53 M. none
32.1578.1 SELDlN JR. STEVEN 79.36 39.15 40.21 04/18/2001 83.23 - none
34.2784~ 1 SEVER, JASON W 83.1 7 47.90 35~27 04/23/2001 30.21 - none
21 .2904.1 SEVrERlt MrKE 82~ 45 53+69 28.76 04/12/2001 57 .52 ~ none
65.0292~ 1 SHAW, MICHAEL 62.93 35.32 27.61 04/23/2001 26.38 .. none
3143030.1 SHAWVER. SCOTT 131 ~ 14 94.64 36.50 04/16/2001 26.38 ~ none
7 4~O322.2 SHELDON~ PAM 68.49 41 ~44 27405 05/17/2001 30.00 ....
42.2526.1 SHELTROWNt ROGER 138.64 99.62 39~O2 05/02/2001 28.76 - none
74.324241 SHEL TROWNt ROGER 85~ 14 43~80 41.34 05/16/2001 121.31 ... none
22.1832~2 S HI ELDS, CHRrSTEN 53~99 27.61 26.38 05/10/2001 26. 38 ~
21 .2836.2 SINGLETON 1 ROD N EY 141 ~26 57.60 46.20 34~ 97 2.49 OS/23/2001 40~OO -
2~O426.1 SKEN E~ JAM ES 144~26 82.28 48.60 13438 OS/21/2001 50~OO - none
2.0380~ 1 SKIVER~ WAYNE D 123.33 81 .40 41 ~ 93 04/20/2001 40.70 .... none
31.0134.1 SMITH~ BRADLEY 109.84 64~31 45~53 04/24/2001 41.23 - none
35.0469~2 SMITHt GREGORY 89~32 52+82 36.50 04/16/2001 30.21 -
21.1782~ 1 SMITH. PAUL 93.13 56~57 36.56 05/01/2001 28.76 ow none
50.0012.1 SMJTH~ PAUL H. 98.22 66.21 32.01 05/15/2001 25~OO · none
3143002.2 SMITH, STEVE 115.15 77.42 37.73 04/24/2001 34.04 -
69.0180.1 SN 10 ER~ JERRY 94.94 48~ 70 46124 05/01/2001 41~ 18 - none
21.0248.1 SPENCER, JAN 69.24 32.86 36.38 o 4f 19/2001 52.76 - none
50.1982.1 SPENCER, JOHN 85.91 46~81 39.1 0 04/23/2001 37.87 - none
50.1254~ 1 SPENCERt ROBERT & CAROLL 59424 32+86 26.38 04/1 8/2001 52.76 - none
20.2999.1 $PRlNKLER - BRENDA ESTATES 1 02434 34~O2 68~32
74.1118.1 ST AHL~ VI RGI N IA 50.76 25.38 25.38 04/16/2001 25.38 .. none
3.0844.1 STAMMERJOHN, JIMMY 1 04.89 66.13 38~ 76 04119/2001 57.52 - none
40.0162~ 1 STASTNY, MARK 75.65 41 ~61 30.21 3.83 05/15/2001 30.21 - none
2.1160~ 1 STATES. DION 91.60 55~22 36.38 04/1 8/2001 52.86 - none
19.0274.2 STEINER, LOUIS 183~4 7 127 ~52 41.62 14~33 03/01/2001 90~OO -
22~ 104841 STEI NER~ THURSTON 204.79 110.02 53.11 41 ~66 OS/22/2001 1 06.00 - none
51 .32BO~ 1 STENSON, VIRGINfA 305.59 305.59 none
fr"** in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
CITY OF MERI DfAN
Cust No
Name
31.1 ooa~ 1 STILES, MICHAEL
65.0376.2 STOKES. RON
46~0356.1 STOUT, JOANNE
50.3800.1 STUHR, WilLIAM & JOANN
69.0646.1 SUOERMAN~ MARK
69.155B~ 1 SUPNET, THOMAS
31 ~3468. 2 SUTTON III ~ DONALD
46~0628.1 SWARTZ. GUY
22.2290 .1 TAYLOR, DEAN
51.1130~ 1 TAYLOR, LARRY
21 ~ 108441 TEASLEYt RICHARD & LINDA
3.9836.2 TERRACE PLAZA L~ L. C~
2~ 11 90.1 TERRELL. A
54.0016.1 TH E PLAYGROUND
54.0018.1 TH E PLA YGROUN D
54.0014.1 THE PLAYGROUND
54. 0012~ 1 THE PLA YG ROUN D
22.1 032.1 THOMPSON. REN
50.2110.2 THOMPSON~ RHONDA
33.3698+2 THOMPSON ~ SUEZETTE
22.1 098. 1 THORMAHLEN, SHANNON
32.0640.1 THORNGREN. CURTIS D.
2142732.3 THURB ER, RONALD
2~4BOO~ 1 TODD. JUDY L~
69.0314.2 TOTMAN t JERRY
21 ~2B14~ 1 TRUCHOT, DARREN & CINDY
42~ 1172~2 TRYON ~ PHIL
42~234843 TUTTLE~ T AMI
51.0302.4 TWOMEY. MATTHEW
74.2876.1 USSERY t TRACY
51 .2996.1 V ALLA~ CAROLYN
22.1052.1 VAN HORN, KEVIN & SAN ORA
42.396B~ 1 VAN HOUTEN. MIKE
21 .1 032. 1 VELADA~ FED ERiCa
33.2578. 1 VERKUYLEN ~ AD
2.186043 VICTORY ~ CH RISTOPH ER
5.0696.1 VIGil, THOMAS
2.4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY
4.1230.3 VINE~ LINDA
42~0324.1 VIVES, MARK
50.374242 VN UK, JOHN
22.0318~ 1 VOORHEESt MICHAEL
2~4020~ 1 VOSS, RA YMON D L~
74.2690.2 VUITTONET, JUAN
1.4689.1 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST
20~O 126.1 W ALLACE1 CRAIG & KRISTIN E
46~6000.2 W ALMART STORE 01-2862
1 ~3340.1 WALSHt RON
7 4.3426r 1 WARDEN, CAROLYN E
1 ~0460~3 WARDLE. JOHN & CHERYL
50.0636.1 WASHINGTON SQUARE APARTf\
50.0638.1 WASHINGTON SQUARE APARTf\
21.2714.1 WATERMANt LORI
7 443052~ 1 WATSON ~ JASON
... in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
(
Delinquent Account List- councif
Standard Payment Customers
Current Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance
Balance
153~29
124~84
69.08
59r24
17 4~43
141 ~50
1 00.28
64.00
62.76
73~89
97 ~53
276.36
164~46
241.44
241.44
275.09
608.06
139.58
87.02
584 79
197~89
147 ~02
187~30
1 05.00
53~99
65.32
65.39
1 04.59
84.00
131 .26
394~06
115~04
79.99
82.45
64~ 16
134.20
463r28
132.87
1 02.54
75~62
509.84
83.68
80.37
88.01
204.75
106.82
20141 0
2,26g~ 11
165.69
67.52
1 03.13
596.04
535.77
117 ~22
79.27
Non-Deli nq
92~BO
28.04
40.24
32.86
111 ~20
74~44
53.38
35~24
35.24
45.36
61 r 15
248.82
1 09~23
140~ 16
140~ 16
162~ 16
410r40
58.83
41 . 75
32.86
115r41
96.43
114~ 10
77.20
27.61
35~24
39~01
75r83
47.62
64.32
51 ~23
53~69
36.55
97.72
96~37
6B~36
52.88
189.41
54.92
53.99
59.62
29 . 1 6
56.57
154~46
1 t914.35
41 ~ 14
65~39
393.48
333.21
58.08
42. 71
04/30/2001
60~49
36.38
28~a4
26.38
63.23
67.06
46~90
2B~ 76
27.52
28.53
36.38
27454
55~23
101.28
101.28
112T93
197.66
32.67
45.27
25.93
49489
50~59
43.82
27.80
26.38
29 r 99
26.38
28. 76
36.38
56.94
28~ 76
28.76
27.61
36.48
36~50
34. 18
22.74
86.99
28.76
26.38
28.39
50~25
46.64
354.76
26.38
32~08
202~56
202.56
59 ~ 14
36.56
03/31/2001
34.04
48.08
32.59
2a~ 76
.09
1 0 ~OO
28. 76
41.70
5.66
(:..
02128/2001
394.06
86.28
463.28
191~74
175.59
165~69
Last Pmt
Date
26.38
05/10/2001
02126/2001
04/20/2001
04/16/2001
04/2312001
04117/2001
04117/2001
04/25/2001
05/03/2001
04/06/2001
04/18/2001
OS/22/2001
04117/2001
04/24/2001
04/24/2001
04/24/2001
04/24/2001
04/17/2001
04/25/2001
04/13/2001
05/04/2001
04/12/2001
04/23/2001
05/14/2001
04/23/2001
05/14/2001
04/13/2001
05/01/2001
04/25/2001
05/16/2001
07111 f2000
01124/2001
04/17/2001
04/20/2001
04/12/2001
.62
11/03/2000
05/03/2001
06/14/2001
OS/29/2001
05/0112001
05/04/2001
OS/21/2001
03/16/2001
04/18/2001
04/18/2001
OS/22/2001
1 0/15/1999
04/17/2001
05/01/2001
04/17/2001
05/14/2001
04/18/2001
05/09/2001
Page: 10
Jun 1 9 ~2001 03:21 pm
Last Pmt
Amount
Msg
51~74.. none
52~ 76 -
26.38 - none
26.38 - none
51.74 - none
47~91 - none
90.10-
57~52 - none
30~OO - none
20.57 -
56.59 -- none
96.87 >>
94.89 ~ none
101.28 - none
101.28 - none
249.67 - none
188~a7 .. none
84~25 M none
78~08 ..
26.83 -
83.83 - none
1 02.55 .. none
155.00 -
20400 .. none
26~38 w
28~67 ~ none
26~38 w
28~ 76 ..
52~ 76 ..
67.06 ~ none
24.08 ~ none
44.08 -or none
57~52 - none
61 ~35 - none
31 ~g2 ~ none
88.34 - none
30.21 - none
22~ 78 ~ none
86.99 -
28. 76 - none
26.38 - none
30.00 -
117.00 ~ none
84433 ... none
71 ~g1 ~ none
2,451 .1 9 ~
191.33 - ***none
52.76 -
25.00 -
202.56 ~ none
202.56 .. none
74.90 - none
36.42 - none
/:.~ ("
(
CITY OF M ER1D1AN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11
Standard Payment Customers J un 19.2001 03: 22pm
Curren t Period: 06/30/2001
Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Bafance
Last Pmt Last Pmt
Cust No Name Balance Non~Delinq 04/30/2001 03/31/2001 02128/2001 Date Amount Msg
31 ~2230.1 WATTERS1 TAMI 124.14 50.14 43.82 30. 18 04/18/2001 35~OO .. none
33.3654.1 WATTS~ WESLEY 67~85 40.24 27.61 05/02/2001 26~38 - none
2.6080.1 WEBB~ GERALD 11 0.88 80.89 29~99 04/17/2001 56.28 - none
34~O350.2 WEBB~ TYLER 179.79 131 .88 47491 04/23/2001 44.08 -
7 4~3544~2 WEBBER~ DAVID 67.68 31 .30 36~38 04/26/2001 56.59 -
22~O946.1 WEBSTER, RICHARD & KATHY 142.75 94.84 45~31 2~60 OS/22/2001 45.31 .. none
31 .3332~ 1 WENTZ, DANIEL R 1 01.06 73~45 27.61 05/01/2001 30~21 .. none
51 .3098.3 WERRY, GREY$ON 126.32 30.97 95.35 04/20/2001 90~OO -
51 ~ 1172r 1 WES WORCESTER 385.78 209.30 176~48 04/06/2001 304.40 -
51 . 1134.1 WES WORCESTER 1 05.08 23.36 16.88 16~88 47496 12/04/2000 12.96 -
42.2284.1 WEST8Y~ KENNETH & LAURETT 80~27 4 7 ~68 32.59 05/01/2001 28.76 - none
75.0500.2 WESTERN ELECTRONICS 2~5g5.06 1.957.03 222.08 233.58 182.37
31.3322~ 1 WESTON, DECKER 285.96 146.22 139.74 06/01/2001 122.13 ... none
46.0326~2 WHEELER, ETHAN 68~ 13 37 r92 30.21 04/20/2001 30.21 -
22.1256~ 1 W HJTE, JAMES & LORI 126.64 93r83 32.81 03/26/2001 98.72 - none
42.3114~ 1 WIER. MONICA 66.72 37 r 70 29.02 04/11/2001 26.00 - none
52.0262.1 WJLD SHAMROCK LLP 1,047.30 422.94 312.18 312.18 05/01/2001 319~84 ~ none
13.2032.2 WILLIAM TYDI NGS 144.44 75.74 40.33 24~54 3.83 04117/2001 24~54 M
20.1660.3 WJLLIAMS~ MIKE 142.89 97.72 45.17 04117/2001 40.25 ~
22.1354.1 WILLIAMSt TE RRI 203.89 125.48 78.41 04116/2001 145.61 ... none
33.3662.1 WILSONt RANDY 85.91 48.04 37~87 04/1612001 71.91 - none
5044490.3 WINTERSt BRIAN 59.24 32.86 26~38 04/12/2001 54.35 ..
4.0896~ 1 WITHERELLt ROBERT 89.14 52. 76 36~38 04/19/2001 52. 76 ~ none
33.2358.2 WOLI N t DALE & LOJS 113.25 69.09 44.16 05/14/2001 37.87 -
6940778.1 WOOD, BRADLEY 77.20 48.44 28.76 05/01/2001 28. 76 - none
3143518.1 WOODt BRETT & JENNIFER 112.02 71 .55 40~4 7 04/1712001 34.04 ~ none
4~ 1560~ 1 WOOD, JONA THAN 136.32 98.67 37.65 04/26/2001 32.59 .. none
32~4801 .1 WOODBRIDGE COMMUNITY LLC 2,259490 1 ,717.20 542.70
13~2072.1 WOODHOUSE. PETER 1214 72 74.07 47.65 04/1 8/2001 72.84 - none
31 ~3344.1 WOODRUFF t NOEL R 185499 87.24 46.32 38.60 13~63 06/08/2001 .31 - none
22.1518~ 1 WQOSLEYt JAMES 128~31 96~O7 32.24 OS/29/2001 40~OO - none
1 ~ 1000.2 WRIGHT. BRANDON 81 ~60 55.22 26.38 OS/22/2001 26~3B -
4r 1254.2 WURT ~ TIM & JENNI FER 129~36 89~ 11 40.25 04/12/2001 B4~33 -
33~23B2.5 Y AMAMOTO~ KRISrrNE 121 .86 74401 4 7 ~85 05/16/2001 49~36 M
34.2766~ 1 YOUNGt TOM 102487 58471 44.16 04/20/2001 91404 - none
50.2338~2 YOUNGER. RUSSELL 74484 40466 34r 18
34. 284 2~ 1 ZASPELt TI MOTHY & 0 EBRA 89.99 63.61 26.38 05/0212001 26~3B - none
51.311 O~2 ZEIMERt DALLEN E 7 4~84 40~66 34.18 04/13/2001 52~ 76 -
51.3320~ 1 ZIMMER~ TIMOTHY P g3~68 63~61 30~O7 04/25/2001 9~ 16 ~ none
Grand Totals: 113t94g~36 59,290~O8 32~339.89 6.510.83 15~808.56
Report Criteria:
Terminated customers not included
Customer~Cust No = {<} 9900000
.-. in Msg COlumn indicates no Notice is to be sent
(:.:.....:.
: zL
LL N -~ :
~ ~ ~l
.... 0 ~J
::JD::I
~ ~ .. :/~~
...J ..J
<( <(
:J U :ij:
I- U)
~ u:
.
_: :III.~
. .
~
..~.~.
B 9 B1
z ~
:J 0 ~
8 ~
o ~ ... ...
l-- ...J
!z t3 ~
W t.n
~ u:
=; %. ;. ~ 1.- ill..:.:.. . ~ :' . ~ . >. ~ . ill III . ~
~ 9 S? .. r:; ~ ~~ !&W~ '~.~ ._~ ~ . . ~ :JlIB I... J
o .,~:~ ,.., ~ m,]
~ .. ~ IIIII!III-.~: !!!I~
...J...J I"- ~ &5
<( <C N N ~
::l t) ~ :
t- rJJ
~ u:
. ~ ~1 iRi.
..J
~ o. €!1 . .. ~ ,. ~. . ..
8 ~ I -,
o ~ / . .q. ~,. ~cr;
~ <i r.: ~ ~
z U :tt: t
W rn
;: u:
tSl];; J! (01. lfj (I. .~ Ii .~~ ~ I' ~ I~, 1].~
,;: I~..f ~. .~ ~1.... III. ~
~ ., 4. ...".~ . .:1. ~ -~4'~'~. :.!1
~ ; ill ..... ., . _ ~. ,^ 1.<- ' . . .. ~
>- Ct) f'-
~ ~ ~ CD
::J 0 =:t :
t- en
~ u:
~ 1m :~-w .~ '9 ~J 11 ~1{C); I~ I
-I g ~.~. >I~~.Q)} ~ ~ ;j
~ en ~Illi~ ~'~ . ~. :=.^-~
::J m"'~;
o ~ R:E
u w , '"'_~
o > I"- M 0 ~ ~ ~ ro ~ 0 ro ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ N ~ ro m ~
~ C3 ~:=~:t co r- (0 co to N La LO (0
W UJ
~ u:
~ Cl co N
N N m I'--
~ (t) N N
, ..~ ~ : H
. s ~]
.1
'1:.
~,
.: 1
. ~ J
y [
.J
I ,.... . ....'
...i.I.II:.
f'.. M co 0
co f'. <D N
(J) to CD 1.0
co
co
v
.ofII;
~
tD!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N
J: a::
~ " 0:
Z ~ W
0 ~ W W ~ .c ..c: to
.......... ......
~ w m [Q < '=t 0 t- :E . .
OJ :E :; < :J :I: ~ N UJ W ..J
~ W W :J ~ CJ ~ W W > ::J t-- ~
> U Z aJ 0::: [2 ~ Z z ~ CJ c...
t -II: U 0 w <t w <( ~ =- ::J =' ~ W 0
t 0 z c ~ u. :E <( :E .., -, -, ct U) ~
C.
:c
J-
Z
o
::=E
I-
<(
:r:
t-
o:::
o
u..
u...
LLr
o
Z
0::
::>
I--
o
Z
en
w
S
en
~
\.
~j~
.( ...
Item Packet Pickup (g'l~'OI C(C~.
~~~~ ~~~~~,~._-~~s<<.@..N-'~Y~$fff!#ft.""o/&..~..JJi ~(~ ~~ ~~~.~. . ~~.~ ~Ar~~~>>"~~~~P~
~. ~~~~'~e.~~f~I~-.~e.~!~-.. ~1".~a~...:~.~.~~11~~e'~~I.~I~e~'~
idffatW wAfffA ~aIS", ~t~Ai~qy~~~,~ ~n '!Iw. ~ 0U. '~a:t. < ~ 101,& ' ~ ~ ? ~Iit.l.l' ,; .!s,,"" ~~
i~~~_~~~"lfIIIIw __,","xJ- ~Jj_-~~~) ~~ iII/AIl ~~_
.W~~~>~~_'~~.~~.'~_~~I.~
Ji*;g ~ ~ mY~~\~~D-~~$Qif _~zx~>;f~~~~~ ~ ~~B~~ ~f!~ 7~ 0 0.\ ~ ~ ~.;7!P ~1~i~l~c._iIl :$~~:~
",,,y~.g .$'\1.0fi0.f~s,,:;:.;S10~'~0,..;.<Y1.*9..d:\ ~~.... <. id~~:~i~'0$0'<"/"';SA~-m-#.",00m(~.GG ., j0f.''''~~r-'S:\ ,~ Y.#k"",l20t;Gx ~~A .1@ :%0 ..~ *S;;:~~~<.0i/'<y....,.....:;o'-<<~B&.
favt .drLrfuJ0 J ~~
(7 J I Y
ID e~\ Cr~1C i1/o L
~ (1 i ~ a d cU\]:) SJJvJ
&/;yj 0 / ~flol /.'30 )~i#fU _
~5iUe IJrlloJ ~;;r{i( tf~oJ
- u fiG( h I (pjq ~ 1::)0.
I I I
JM(;l -
~.. 1')1+
l. ..
Primeland Development Company
1111 S Orchard, Suite 155
Boise, ID 83705
385.. 731 0
Fax: 385-7373
May 31 , 200 1
RECEIVED
JUN - 5 2001
CITY OF MERIDIAN
City of Meridian
Attn: City Council Members
33 East Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: White Drain Sewer Trunk Line- Bridgetower Crossing
Dear Council Members,
This letter is regarding the White Drain Sewer Trunk Easement proposed within the Bridgetower Crossing
project Comments have been Inade by members of your staff that Mr. Bews and I have been delaying the
design and construction of the White Drain Sewer Trunk. We would like to set the record straight by
expressing our desire to grant the easelnent through OUf property upon its satisfactory presentation to us. We
would like to emphasize our past and current cooperation with your Public Works Department Mr. Bews
initiated and completed the design and construction of the first section of the trunk line through the Ten Mile
Mini Storage parcel and north for an additional quarter mile on Ten Mile Road. This was cOlnpleted by
February 200 1 ,
We believe we have Inade effort to facilitate the easement process by providing an electronic copy of the
roadway network and lot configuration of our project to your .Public Works Department in January. We also
provided a legal description of the sewer Inain location to Mr. Sluith on March 3 to facilitate the drafting of
the easement dOClllnent We again requested verbally on .May 15 that the City draft the easelnent that
traverses the .Bridgetower Crossing project. On .May 31,200'1, approxinlately 3 weeks after OUf verbal
request of May 15, a written request was sent to your staff~ Please see the copy enclosed. To this date we
have not received any easelnent doculnentation or written correspondence on this easelnent.
V.le have no desire to delay the design and construction of the White Drain Trunk~ If the Public Works
.Departlnent will provide the easelnent dOClunent, we wjlI sign it in an expeditious manner. We are also
willing to work with Public Works in perfonning the actual construction of the first half mile of the sewer
trunk line~ if the City sees this as expeditious to the process~
We appreciate your tilne and attention in this matter and look forward to working with the City of Meridian
in providing the White .Drain Sewer Trunk easelnents.
Sincerely,
A.
cc. Gary Slnith, Public Works Director