HomeMy WebLinkAboutYanke, Ronald AZ 02-017September 3, 2002
AZ 02-017
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING September 5, 2002
APPLICANT Ronald Yanke and Walter T. Sigmont, Jr. ITEM NO. S
REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for annexation and zoning of 5.41 acres from M-1 to I-L zones
for Ronald Yanke property -northwest comer of East Franklin Road and North Eagle Road on
East Lanark Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
SANITARY SERVICE:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted: f \ II I\1 II
COMMENTS
See attached Comments
See attached Comments
"Ok with Meridian Water"
"No Comment"
"No Comments at this time"
See attached Comments
~j,~U
~~
"We have No ObJecflons to this Proposal"
No Comment
Date:
at public meeMnga shall become
Phone:
of fhe City of Meridian.
i
' ., iii ,.: : .. i I4
~Ia ;Ij ~ ;; I III (ia' I;
Menc~ian Fire Depar~riient
August 13, 2002
TO: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Fire Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Yanke & Sigmont Property File - AZ 02-017
The following aze the requirements to provide minimum fire protection:
Joseph Silva
Deputy Chief
Meridian Fire Deparhnent
540 E. Franklin Rd.
Meridian, Id 83642
(208) 888-1234
Fax (208) 895-039D
I~,~CEIVED
AUG 1 52002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
1. Provide afire-flow as required by the 1997 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III-A. Please show all
proximity hydrants within 500' of the project on the resubmitted plat.
2. All entrances and internal roads shall corners with a minimum of a 28' inside radius and 48'
outs?de radius.
3. The proposed buildings & uses shall comply with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code.
4. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon acceptance of the water system
by the City of Meridian for water quality.
5. Final approval of fire hydrant locations shall by the Fire Department.
6. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards and shall have a cleaz driving
surface, which is 20' wide. Any building more than 30' in height shall have a 26' wide access road to
provide for aerial truck operations. UFC 902.2.1
7. All building uses and occupancies will have to meet the sepazation requirements of the
Uniform Building Code.
~ ~ ~ : 'I'
.y.. '..I' o. ~'I ~I
~i~~'~Ce~~ctorsMpn#J,r ;i ,~ ii;I~ ~~„ II~I~ ~Ii~i~~
~.
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
c~~
~ e-
(;ITY OF l~~l;l'
eri~ian ~f ~~~
~~
IDAHO I;
T jj
e F
Kcuh Bird a : V PLANNING AND ZONING
SINCf
I Isaa (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ~ ~ 1 u1M
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 2
Transmittal Date: July 23, 2002
File No.: AZ 02-017
Request:
2002
Hearing Date:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208)238-2499 • Fax 288-?501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579 • Fax 898-550[
PUBLIC WORKS
(208)896-5500 •Fax 887-1297
BUILDMG DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 687-1297
2002
Request for annexation and zoning of 5.41 acres from M-1 to I-L for Ronald
By: Ronald Yanke & Walter T. Sigmont, Jr.
Location of Property or Project: NW comer E. Franklin Rd., west of N. Eagle Rd. on E. Lanark St.
David Zaremba, P2 (Na vAR, vac, FPJ
Jerry Centers, P2 (No VAR, VAC FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC FP)
Keven Shreeve, P2 (No VAR, vac, FP)
.Keith BOfUp, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Meridian School District (NO FP)
Meridian Post Office (FPiPPOny)
Ada County Highway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian brig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power CO. (FP/PP ony)
11.5. West (FPNP Only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPrPP Dory)
Idaho Transportation Department (NO FP)
Ada County (AZorny)
Fire Department
,/ Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
KQT FP-If PM-FP •1T MPNPC- 20 COP-m
RECEIVED
AUG 9 3 2Q~~
City of Meridian
33 EAST IDAHO • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 City Clerk Offl
(208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Ot'tice Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723
. ~~ ~~~.
C
Ada County highway District
Dave Bivens, 1st Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499
Judy Peavey-Derr, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us
August 7, 2002
TO: Ronald Yanke & Walter T. Sigmont, Jr.
4414 S. Gekeler Lane
Boise, ID 83716
FROM: Craig Hood
Development Analyst
Planning & Development
SUBJECT: Lanark Street Rezone/Annexation
Rezone 5.41-acres from M-1 to I-L
Southwest corner of Lanark Street and Eagle Road
RECEIVED
AUG - B 2002
City oP Meridian
City Clerk Office
On August 6, 2002, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced
project. The attached report lists conditions of approval and street improvements, which may be required
when a development application is submitted for this site in the future.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact staff at (208) 387-6170.
S' erely,
Craig Hood
Development Ana yst
Cc: Planning & Development/chron/project file
City of Meridian
Construction Services
Drainage
Utilities
Ada County Highway District
PZanning Review Division
This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level as of August 6, 2002.
Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on August 2, 2002. Please refer to Attachment 3 for
appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Craig Hood, 387-6174, chood@achd.ada.id.us
File Number: MAZ02-017
Site address: Lanark Street, on the west side of Eagle Road, just south of Franklin Road
Owners: Ronald Yanke & Walter T. Sigmont, Jr.
4414 S. Gekeler Lane
Boise, ID 83716
Applicant: City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
Application Information
The applicant is seeking annexation and rezone approval to rezone approximately 5.41-acres of M-1
property in Ada County into the City of Meridian's I-L zone. The site is located on Lanark Street, on the west
side of Eagle Road, just south of Franklin Road.
Acreage: 5.41-acres
Current Zoning: M-1
Proposed Zoning: I-L
Existing buildable lots: 8
Vicinii
A. Findings of Fact
Trip Generation: The vacant parcel(s) included in this application are estimated to generate 120
additional vehicle trips per day (208 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual.
2. Impact Fees: The impact fee rate from the fee tables for this use is $1,427 per thousand square feet
of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time.
3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information: There are currently some warehouses and light industrial uses on this site. There
is also a vacant parcel(s) that is being used as a parking lot.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Industrial warehouses/Union Pacific Rail Road tracks
b. South: Commercial/industrial building
c. East: R.C. Willey store
d. West: Vacant field
6. Impacted Roadways:
Eagle Road:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Speed limit:
Nearest intersection:
Lanark Street:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Speed limit:
Nearest intersection:
300-feet
Primary arterial
42,307 south of Franklin Road on 2/20/02
LOS F
50 MPH
Lanark Street, atwo-way stop controlled intersection
1,200-feet
Local/commercial
No current count available
25 MPH
Eagle Road, atwo-way stop controlled intersection
7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
Eagle Road is currently improved with 5 lanes (two northbound, two southbound and a center turn
lane) no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site or across the street on the east. Lanark Street is
currently improved with 2 lanes (no center turn lane) with no curb or sidewalk abutting the property.
There is valley gutter on bath the north and south side of Lanark Street and some sidewalk abutting
the parcel just to the east of the site.
8. Existing Right-of-Way
There is approximately 200-feet of right-of--way (100-feet from centerline) for Eagle Road abutting this
property. There is currently 50-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) for Lanark Street abutting
the property.
10. Site History
ACHD has reviewed this site as part of the Olson and Bush Industrial Park Subdivision in 1978.
2
11. Five Year Work Program
Franklin Road from Meridian Road to Eagle Road is currently in the Five Year Work Program for
roadway improvements in 2004. Franklin Road from Eagle Road to Cloverdale Road in currently in
the Five Year Work Program for roadway improvements in 2007.
B. Findings for Consideration
Right-of-Way
District policy 7202.8 and 72-F16, requires roadways abutting commercial developments to be
constructed as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of
right-of-way.
2. Access points
State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department
(ITD). Access to Eagle Road is permitted by ITD on an individual application basis. ITD normally
requests ACHD to comment on driveway applications in Ada County. With the Olson and Bush
Industrial Park Subdivision, a note was placed on the plat that restricts direct lot access to Eagle
Road for this property. In accordance with District policy 72028.2, lot access to industrial and
commercial streets from abutting properly is permitted. Controls for driveway and intersection
placement should be required.
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles
to a maximum width of 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type
facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for
driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked
onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to
pave any driveways to their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement
of Lanark Street and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the roadway edge.
3. Roadway improvements
Pavement width
District policy (Figure 72-F1 B) requires industrial/commercial streets to have 40-foot street section
within 54-feet of right-of--way.
Sidewalk
District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all commercial streets (Figure 72-
F1B). However, District policy 7204.9.1 states that in same existing industrial developments or
expansions of those developments, the District will allow deviations from the street standards by not
requiring the construction of sidewalks. These developments include primary uses of storage
facilities, trucking terminals, contractor shops, utility shops and selective heavy manufacturing
facilities in which significant pedestrian movement is not anticipated.
Curb and gutter
Curb and gutter are required on industrial/commercial streets (7204.9.1). Rolled, mountable or
industrial type curbs will be allowed if the developer shows that: 1) water from the equivalent of a two-
yearstorm will be contained in the gutter; and 2) access points will be identified with barriers such as
raised landscaping strips, berms, etc.
3
The District will evaluate the need for roadway improvements to Lanark Street when a development
application is received in the future.
C. If the rezone is approved and the District receives a development
proposal, the District intends to provide the following requirements, in
addition to any additional requirements that may apply upon District
review of future development, to the City of Meridian:
Dedicate 27-feet of right-of--way from the centerline of Lanark Street abutting the parcel by
means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to
issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to
30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested
material. The owner will not be compensated for this additional right-of-way because Lanark
Street is a local/local commercial street and is to be brought to adopted standards by the
developers of abutting properties.
2. Comply with requirements of ITD for State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) frontage. Submit to the
District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat
or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits); whichever occurs first. Contact
District III Traffic Engineer Michael Garz at 334-8340.
3. Construct curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk and match paving on Lanark Street
abutting the parcel. Improvements shall be constructed to one-half of a 40-foot street section
on each side of the roadway.
4. Pave all driveways to their full-required width and to a point 30-feet beyond the edge of
pavement of Lanark Street with 15-foot curb radii/pavement tapers abutting the existing
roadway edge.
5. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways,
shall be placed on future development of this parcel.
6. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing
utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The
applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to
breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-
6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of
construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waivedvariance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed rezone and future use/development will
not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the
vicinity impacted by the proposed application.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Map
3. Appeal Guidelines
a
N
0
0
w
n
Z
I~
o°
N
t+1
N EAGLE RD
rn
c~
rn
o N 128'10' E
y m
o o
z
~ ~ ~' a -a
ti ~ o
m c
x
~
~
W
~ _ O
~
O
A ~ ~ ~"'
A .• ~
I v ~
Mo
_~
2~
N O ~
O
r
r
EAGLE ROAD
-~~
o r ~~
0
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACRD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall indude a
written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
Appeal Guidelines
6
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE 5-Sep-02
PROJECT NUMBER AZ 02-017
PROJECT NAME Ronald Yanke Property
NAME FOR AGAINST
City Clerk Office
I3UB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A GOOd P1aCC t0 LIVO
Robert D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN
CrI'Y COUNCII. MEMBERS
Ta~ydeW~ 33 EAST IDAHO
xerth sird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Cherie McCandless (208) 888`k}33 ~ FAX (208) 887-0813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-0218
William L.M. Nary
MEMORANDUM:
To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner III ~(`
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech
Ire: Olson & Bash Industrial Park Annexation
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKB
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 ~ Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 8845533 ~ FAX 8886854
,~C~IVEL
-~-~ ~ 0 ~° ~ ,~''
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CI_F_RK OFFICE
Annexation and Zoning of 5.41 Acres from M-1 (Ada County) to I-L
(Industrial -Light), by Ronald Yanke & Walter T. Sigmont, 7r. (File No. AZ-
02-OI7).
We have reviewed the above-referenced submittal and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approvsL These conditions shall be considered in fall, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The Planning & Zoning Department staff prepared the subject Annexation and Zoning
application on behalf of the applicants, Mr. Yanke and Mr. Sigmont, at their request. The
property, which encompasses eight (8) lots within the Olson & Bush Industrial Subdivision, is an
Ada County enclave, surrounded on all four sides by existing city limits. The lots to be annexed
average .87 acres each, for a gross area of 5.41 acres The two eastern-most lots on the south side
of Lanark Street are owned by Mr. Sigmo~ and the remaining six lots are owned by Mr. Yanke.
,LOCATION
The subject lots are located within the Olson and Bush Lrdustrial Park on the west side of N.
Eagle Road, immediately south of the railroad tracks. ~ - __
`1' ~ z ~1~r7~. ~~5
OiTTTAiT1TT11~T/~ TTATSDT-/i Q
North: UPRR tracks and Elixir Industries, caned I-L q ~ ®5 _ Q 2
South: Commercial~mdustrial buildings, caned I L
East: R.C. Willey furniture store and vacant commercial lots, caned C-G p ~ -~L~. ~
West: A vacant, 14.4-acre parcel (owned by R 2 Developme~), caned I-L J
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-IS-11, General Stcvulards Applicable to ZoningAraex~ents, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances
A7.02-0D Ym~ a...b:.~ ti
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
September 3, 2002
Page 2
of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in Section 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the application is in conformance with the 1993 Comprehensive
Plan, which designated the property as "Light Industrial", and with the August
2002 Comprehensive Plan, which designates the property as "Industrial".
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
Staff does not anticipate that the land to be annexed will be rezoned in the future
to anything other than the requested zone.
C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff finds that, with the exception of one of the eight lots, the subject property is
built-out and developed in a manner consistent with the industrial zoning. Staff
anticipates that the undeveloped lot may be developed in the fixture in accordance
with the I-L zone.
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that the subject property is a Couxxty enclave, surrounded on four sides
by I-L zoning. The I-L zoning approved for the surrounding properties may
dictate that the property should be zoned to match, especially since it is part of the
same subdivision.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
AZ02-017 Yanl~ N°1°~a~O^~
Planning & Zoning CommissionMIayor & City Council
September 3, 2002
Page 3
Staff finds that the proposed I-L zoning will not change the intended character of
the area. Rather, it will have the effect of changing the property from an enclave
to the intended character of the property.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine
whether or not the rezone will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or future
neighboring uses. Since only one of the eight lots to be annexed is undeveloped
and the existing uses are operated in a manner that is not hazazdous or disturbing,
this finding is met.
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be annexed can be served adequately at this time
by all essential public facilities and services.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost
and that the annexation and zoning will not be detrimental to the community's
economic welfare.
I. Will the proposed uses oot involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
There aze no proposed uses in this application. Statl' finds that the existing
buildings and uses do not create excessive traffic, noise or other nuisances that
would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding
industrial/commercial area.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that both Lanark Street and Eagle Road are dedicated public roadways
that adequately serve the subject lots.
AZ-02-01] YaNce eW~exation.AZ
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
September 3, 2002
Page 4
K Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds that no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or
damaged by approving the annexation and rezone.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the annexation of this enclave property would be in the best
interest of the City.
POINTS OF DISCUSSION
1. The Applicant should be prepazed to address the building setbacks and heights of all
existing structures on the lots to be annexed to confirm they are in compliance with the
City of Meridian's Ordinance 11-9-1, Minimum Yard Setback Requirements. The
minimum front setback is 35 feet and the maximum building height is 40 feet.
ANEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of
the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to
existing city limits
2. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area. Essential City services
aze available to the subject property.
SITE SPECIFIC REOUIItEMENTS
1. All lots within the subject annexation shall he served by existing City of Meridian
sanitary sewer and water mains within Lanark Street.
2. All parking and associated drive aisles shall be paved per Ordinance 11-13-4.D.
Dimensions of all parking facilities shall meet the requirements of Ordinance 11-13-4.E
and F.
3. All future development of vacant lots and re-developmern of existing built lots shall
conform with the City of Meridian Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances.
4. All signage for the proposed project shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in
Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance.
5. Provide off-street parking in accordance with the City of Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for
use of property.
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
September 3, 2002
Page 5
6. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation and rezone, with the conditions noted
above.
e1Z-02-017 YmJceNmwaton.AZ