HomeMy WebLinkAboutBrown and Caldwell WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Updated Task Order 10022a/PO23-0198 i
Mayor Robert E. Simison
E IDIAN�- City Council Members
Joe Borton
Tre-Beret
Luke Cavener
Public Works I D A H O Brad Hoaglun
Jessica Perreault
Department Liz Strader
TO: Mayor Robert Simison
Members of the City Council
FROM: Clint Dolsby, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
DATE: December 28, 2022
SUBJECT: TASK ORDER#10022a WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL PURSUANT TO THE
MASTER AGREEMENT CATEGORY 2A FOR THE WRRF 2023 FACILITY PLAN
UPDATE FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $490,923.00
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Move to:
1. Approve Task Order 1022a with Brown and Caldwell for the WRRF 2023 Facility Plan
Update for a not-to-exceed cost of$490,923.00.
2. Authorize the Purchasing Manager to sign the agreement.
II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
Clint Dolsby PE, Assistant City Engineer 489-0341
Warren Stewart PE, City Engineer 489-0350
Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 489-0259
III. DESCRIPTION
A. Background
The City of Meridian (City) is upgrading the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility
(WRRF) to increase the level of treatment to meet expected lower National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits for total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia. In order to
properly plan for both short-and long-term improvements necessary to meet these NPDES permit
requirements, the City is completing a Facility Plan Update to replace their previous facility plan
completed in 2018. This facility plan update will satisfy the Idaho Department of
Environmental's rule that states, "all existing municipal wastewater treatment or disposal
Public Works Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue,Suite 200, Meridian, 1D 83642
Phone 208-898-5500 . Fax 208-898-9551 . www.meridiancity.org
facilities undergoing material modification or expansion, are required to have a current facility
plan."
B. Proposed Project
The facility plan will document the plant improvements completed to date and will serve to provide
the necessary planning and alternative evaluation documentation. It will provide a path forward
to meet the NPDES Permit limits and fulfill IDAPA 58.01.06- Wastewater Rules, §410Facility
and Design Standards for Municipal Wastewater Treatment or Disposal Facilities—Facility Plans
for meeting wastewater treatment needs until 2043, taking into consideration conditions
envisioned to build-out of the planning area. The facility plan will include a capital improvement
plan through 2033 and identify preferred wastewater and biosolids treatment and disposal options.
C. Consultant Selection
Brown and Caldwell was selected for this project due to their expertise in the planning, design
and analysis of wastewater treatment plants and their work on similar wastewater facility planning
projects.
IV. IMPACT
A. Strategic Impact:
This project meets our mission requirements to identify and prioritize work to anticipate,plan and
provide public services and facilities that support the needs of our growing community, ensure
modern, reliable facilities while maintaining financial stewardship and maintaining the ability to
meet the changing permit limit requirements.
B. Fiscal Impact:
Project Costs
WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update $490,923.00
Total Cost $490,923.00
Project Funding
FY 2023 WRRF Facility Plan Update (3500-55000) $600,000.00
Total Funding $600,000.00
VI. TIME CONSTRAINTS
Council's approval will allow this critical project at the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility to
be completed this fiscal year.
VII. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
A. Task Order No. 0022a
Department Approval:
Page 2 of 2
C�
fIEN .D L4,,
MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL
Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda
From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 2/7/2023
Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: N/A
Topic: Approval of Task Order 10022.a and Purchase Order No. 23-0198 to Brown &
Caldwell, Inc. for the WRRF Facility Plan Update project for the Not-To-Exceed
amount of$490,923.00.
Recommended Council Action:
Approval of Task Order #10549.b and Purchase Order 23-0198.
Background:
TASK ORDER NO. 10022.a
Pursuant to the
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND BROWN AND CALDWELL (CONSULTANT)
This Task Order is made this 71" day of February, 2023 and entered into by and between
the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by BROWN AND CALDWELL, INC.,
hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and
conditions contained in the Master Agreement (category 2a) between the above-
mentioned parties dated October 1 , 2020. The Project Name for this Task Order is as
follows:
WRRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING SUMMARY
The City of Meridian (City) is upgrading the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery
Facility (WRRF) to respond to growth in the service area and to increase the level of
treatment to meet lower Idaho Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (IPDES) effluent
permit limits for total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia. In order to properly plan for both
short- and long-term improvements necessary to meet these IPDES permit requirements,
the City is completing a Facility Plan Update to supplement their previous facility plan
completed in 2018. This Facility Plan Update will also serve to prepare the necessary
planning and alternative evaluation documentation needed for regulatory approval and
will incorporate all portions required by Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
The Facility Plan Update will include the following tasks:
• Task 1 — Project Management
• Task 2 — Facility Plan
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 Project Management
1.1 Project Management Activities
Objective. To manage, administer, and provide ongoing coordination for utilization of
resources for the project. This task includes technical and financial management of the
contract and acting as liaison with the City, operational staff, and project team.
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 1 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• All communication from the consultant regarding the project will include the City
project manager (PM) or designee. The City PM will be responsible for coordinating
and providing all review comments and the resolution of all issues to the Engineer in
a timely manner (typically 14 calendar days for design review); all other decisions will
be provided to the Engineer within 7 calendar days or less. The Engineer PM will be
responsible for drafting meeting minutes.
• The Engineer will document any and all requested changes to the scope of work using
a Project Change Request form. The Engineer PM will collaborate with the City PM
to develop an approach for addressing the change(s). The City PM will review all
changes for approval and provide the Engineer with written approval prior to modifying
the existing scope, schedule, or budget and prior to proceeding with any new or
unscoped work activities.
• This subtask includes the following activities:
o Develop a Project Management Plan and Quality Plan for internal use.
o Prepare monthly project status reports. Progress reports will identify
budget status, progress status, activities of the previous month, and
upcoming activities.
o Attend project kickoff meeting with City staff.
o Attend up to four (4) coordination meetings with City staff.
City Responsibilities. Provide the following:
• Identification of a PM with final authority for City decisions.
• Timely review of products and decisions on issues critical to scheduled progress.
• Identification and involvement of appropriate City staff.
• Coordination of collected comments and resolution of any conflicting comments from
all City reviewers prior to returning to the Engineer.
Deliverables. Deliverables for the tasks listed above include the following items:
• Monthly progress reports and invoices
• Meeting minutes, as required
1.2 City Workshops
Objective. Present the progress made on the Facility Plan and review key decisions
and recommendations with City staff.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Prepare for and conduct up to five (5) workshops with City staff through the life of the
project to communicate progress made on the Facility Plan Update, review pertinent
key topics, and plan next steps. Each workshop is assumed to be 3 hours in duration.
It is assumed that two (2) workshops will require the attendance of one out-of-town
BC team member. All workshops will have up to four BC team members in attendance.
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 2 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
• Document the workshops and provide a summary of action items to team members
at the conclusion of each workshop.
Deliverables.
• Workshop agendas, materials, minutes, and summary of action items.
1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
Objective. Present the progress made on the Facility Plan and review key decisions
and recommendations with City staff.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Implement a QA/QC program as defined in the Quality Plan to review products from
this scope. City and regulatory agency review comments will also be incorporated to
prepare and complete the final facility plan documents. Additionally, the City is
assumed to participate in this process and provide independent review of products.
• Consultant will provide appropriate calculation and deliverable QA/QC reviews by in-
house, senior staff members.
Task 2 Facility Plan
2.1 Investigate Existing Wastewater System Conditions
Objective. To present the current and currently planned (in design or construction)
systems for the Meridian WRRF, including capacity of each major unit process.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Identify the existing City planning area.
• Conduct a survey of the existing facilities with Meridian staff. Include in this:
— Discuss equipment condition/age based on interview with WRRF operations and
maintenance staff.
— Incorporate results of the 2020 Fermenter Analysis when determining carbon
demand/chemical storage capacity.
— Incorporate current upgrades for existing aeration basins, Digester 6, sidestream
phosphorus, and tertiary filtration that are in design or construction for updating
existing system capacity.
— Incorporate existing water reuse practices.
— Discuss existing environmental conditions in the planning area.
— Incorporate a discussion on the limitations of the existing outfall system to the
Boise River.
— Provide description of current IPDES permit.
• Review the last 5 years of historical influent flows, loads, and population in the City
• Review any planned flow reduction measures for the City, including:
— I&I reductions in the collection system
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 3 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
— Water conservation around the City
— Water conservation requirements for new and existing housing developments,
commercial developments, and industries within the City
• Related water quality planning documentation, including-
- State water quality requirements for receiving waters in the service area
— Designated uses for receiving waters
— Water quality and technology based effluent limitations
— Current TMDL issues for the receiving waters as they relate to future IPDES
permit limitations
— Related City water resources planning (if different from 2018 facility plan)
— Related air quality permits
City Responsibilities. Provide the following:
— Provide daily historical operating data for the past five (5) years.
— Provide the most recent set of facility flow and loading projections.
— Attend operation/maintenance staff interview meeting to discuss equipment
condition/age.
— Provide access to WRRF design data, including drawings, equipment submittal
documents, product data, and relevant plans and studies, upon request.
Deliverables.
— Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask.
2.2 Wastewater Characterization
Objective. To collect and organize WRRF liquid and solids stream data for
recalibration of the WRRF's BioWin model.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Prepare a sampling plan for a 14-day wastewater characterization to be conducted at
the WRRF. Sampling will include daily grab and composite sampling of multiple
constituents at several points in the WWRF's liquid and solids treatment processes.
It will also include one day of diurnal sampling for select constituents. Wastewater
characterization data will be used to calibrate biological process models in the
capacity assessment described below.
• Hold a meeting to discuss the sampling plan and to distribute responsibilities between
BC, the City, and contract laboratories.
• Coordinate the conduct of the sampling, providing direction to City staff regarding
sampling times and locations.
City Responsibilities. Provide the following:
• Review and comment on the wastewater characterization sampling plan.
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 4 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
• Participate in the wastewater characterization meeting.
• Collect wastewater characterization samples, conduct laboratory analyses, and
send samples to contract laboratories (as required).
Deliverables.
• Wastewater sampling plan.
• Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask.
2.3 Capacity Assessment Update
Objective. To update the total capacity of the WRRF operating as designed, with all
units in service, as well as the IDEA-defined firm capacity with the largest of each type of
process unit out of service. Also to prioritize processes for optimization and upgrade.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Construct a solids mass balance based upon historical data and data obtained during
the wastewater characterization. Assess mass balance closure across various WRRF
unit processes in order to determine data gaps, irregularities, or inconsistencies in the
data record. Use calibrated mass balance to project system loadings for use in the
following tasks.
• Update the WRRF hydraulic profile as needed, using Visual Hydraulics software.
Portions of the profile were updated for Aeration Basins 9-10/1-4 Retrofit project.
• Update the primary sedimentation performance model to project loadings to the
secondary process. This will include a statistical correlation of recent historical TSS
and BOD removals with hydraulic and mass loading.
• Calibrate BioWin activated sludge process model with data collected during the
wastewater characterization.
• Use calibrated BioWin models to simulate performance across a range of flows and
loads, for up to a maximum of two (2) different operating conditions, as selected by
the City. Conditions may include the following variables:
O Seasonal condition: summer, winter
O Effluent target condition: final permit
O Units in service: primary clarifiers, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers,
fermenter (or just chemical), tertiary filters
• Use the updated models to project a suite of WRRF parameters, including effluent
characteristics, effluent loadings, secondary clarifier loadings, WAS flow and
loadings, and RAS flows.
• Update the secondary clarification system state point analysis (SPA) model using
recent WRRF historical data. The SPA model is a graphical approach to determining
secondary clarifier capacity, with no sampling or onsite testing. The model depends
upon flow, mixed liquor settleability (characterized via the sludge volume index [SVI]),
clarifier surface area, and RAS flow rate. The model does not account for unique
clarifier geometry including center wells, launders, depth, or energy dissipating inlet
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 5 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
structures. Use the calibrated SPA model, in concert with the biological model outputs,
to project the capacity of the secondary clarifiers.
• Update the capacity of the solids handing treatment processes as needed, including
DAFT, fermentation, digestion, and dewatering. Capacity will be evaluated through
analysis of plant historical data and manufacturer's rated capacities of unit processes,
with no onsite sampling or testing.
• Update the capacity of the disinfection and tertiary filtration systems using vendor
specifications, design calculations, and plant performance data.
• Combine the information from all above items in this subtask to form an integrated
assessment of the plant capacity and bottlenecks, with a prioritized list of bottlenecks
and composite rating diagrams.
City Responsibilities. Provide the following:
• Provide access to Plant design data, including drawings, equipment submittal
documents, product data, and relevant plans and studies, upon request.
• Provide operating levels and typical recycle rates for unit processes as needed.
• Conduct water surface elevation measurements as needed.
• Review and comment on the capacity recommendations.
Deliverables.
• Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask.
2.4 Planning Criteria
Objective. Identify the planning criteria for use in alternatives evaluation and capital
improvements planning for the Facility Plan.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Use the population and industry growth flow and loading projections developed as
part of the Sewer Master Plan Update.
• Develop projections for primary and secondary solids production based on flow and
load projections from the Sewer Master Plan Update.
• Develop/update projections for biogas production based on digestion technology and
solids production projections.
• Establish future discharge split to water reuse vs. Five Mile Creek.
• Discuss potential future discharge criteria, including nutrients,
microconstituents/compounds of emerging concern, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS).
• Establish potential future discharge criteria for IPDES discharge or reclaimed water
permits for anticipated flows and loads, depending on point of final discharge.
Deliverables.
• Chapter on future conditions for the Facility Plan.
Task Order 10022.a W RRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 6 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
2.5 Liquid and Solids Treatment Analysis
Objective. Evaluate alternatives for upgrading the Meridian WRRF to meet planning
criteria requirements for both liquids and solids streams.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Based on revised capacity assessment and flow/load projections, update timeline
presented in 2018 facility plan for adding clarifiers and aeration basins, along with
digesters and solids handling processes.
• Evaluate potential energy and chemical-saving liquid stream process improvements,
including ammonia-based aeration control (ABAC), low DO aeration basin operation,
and hydrocyclone wasting. Do not evaluate future new technologies for biological
treatment expansion (i.e., no evaluation of IFAS alternatives for expansion).
• Update discussion and cost analysis (AACE Class 5) for a secondary road access to
the treatment facility from the North or West side of the facility.
• Evaluate solids-stream discharge improvements, including planned dryer upgrades
and biogas expansion project. Provide planning level (AACE Class 5) cost estimate
for alternatives identified for the solids system expansions.
• Provide costs for liquid process expansion based on the Aeration Basins 9-10/1-4
Retrofit design project.
• Provide rough site plan showing plant layout for recommended alternatives. Include
preliminary site planning for future facilities on the 40 acres owned by the City north
of the WRRF. Site plans will not be done in CAD.
• Recommend alternatives based on cost evaluation and input from the City. For the
final selected alternatives for the facility (both solids and liquids)-
- Identify any site security limitations/requirements.
— Identify future aesthetic needs for the facility (odor control, noise control, traffic
control on and off site).
— Provide a staffing and organization evaluation, including future needs for staffing,
organization of the utility, and projected costs of O&M for the expansion option.
— Provide an evaluation of non-treatment process needs, including administrative
office space, lab space, maintenance space, and equipment storage space. This
will include an evaluation of the future of the mechanical building, including the
limitations and constraints (e.g., electrical and communications) that could trigger
a need to change or reorganize the functions that reside there.
— Incorporating findings of other City studies into utility systems. These would
include non-potable water, gas, communications, and electrical systems within the
site.
Deliverables.
• Report chapters for discussion of alternatives and recommendation for expansion to
be incorporated into the Facility Plan report.
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 7 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
2.6 Other Related Evaluations
Objective. Reference previous evaluation for resource recovery options and options
for potential future permit limits not in the current permit.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Reference and provide brief update on Resource Recovery Study from 2018 Facility
Plan. No additional resource recovery evaluation will be conducted.
Deliverables.
• Brief report section to be incorporated into the Facility Plan report.
2.7 CIP
Objective. Prepare a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for the Meridian WRRF that
provides a clear outline of the regulatory-required and maintenance/age related
replacement projects between 2023 and 2043 (including estimated cost and approximate
year for initiation of each project). It is assumed the City will complete their own financial
options evaluation for funding of projects.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Based on the recommendations from Subtask 4, assess the delivery methods for
project delivery for projects identified to support the selected alternative. The delivery
analysis will consider project grouping and potential delivery methods to meet
regulatory, financial, and organizational constraints.
• Using updated flow and loading estimates, IPDES permit renewal conditions, and
capacity assessment, prepare a CIP for the Meridian WRRF. This CIP will include
planning-level (AACE Class 5) cost estimates for projects and an estimated project
initiation date.
• Evaluate replacement schedule for major equipment and parts, based on equipment
age and/or condition. This replacement schedule will include biotower media, new
tertiary filter membranes, solids handling equipment, and any other critical equipment
with high maintenance costs that would be incurred in the analysis period.
Deliverables.
• Report chapter to be incorporated into the Facility Plan Report.
2.8 Facility Plan Development
Objective. Prepare a comprehensive facilities plan document that summarizes the
findings from the above tasks and provides a clear framework for improvements to the
Meridian WRRF.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
• Summarize activities from Subtask 1 through Subtask 7, including a comprehensive
CIP that will include costs and schedule for improvements, in a draft Facility Plan. It
is assumed that the draft Facility Plan will require the synthesis of information from
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 8 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
the previous tasks for presentation to the IDEA. The Facility Plan will be reviewed by
a senior reviewer prior to being submitted to the City.
• Prepare a final Facility Plan that provides a clear action plan for WRRF Upgrades.
• Prepare for and lead up to two meetings with the City and the IDEA to discuss the
findings of the Facility Plan and the City's intended action plan for expansion. It is
assumed that two members of BC team will attend each of these two-hour meetings.
Deliverables.
• Agenda and meeting materials for up to two meetings with the IDEA to discuss the
findings of the Facility Plan.
• Draft Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted electronically to the City for one round
of review and comment.
• Final Draft Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted electronically to the IDEA for one
round of review and comment.
• Final version of Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted in electronic and hardcopy
format to the City and the IDEA.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Note that work scope is conceptual in nature, based on limited information, and should
only be relied upon for general planning purposes.
• Consultant will rely upon, without independent information, information from third
parties, including available information related to reports related to key plant
processes.
• It is assumed that the facility will not change process configurations for liquids or solids
stream treatment, though process or energy performance enhancement may be
achieved with upgrades as described in Task 2 Subtask 5.
• Recommendations and potential energy savings are based upon many data points
and assumptions. Many of these variables are affected by the influent characteristics,
costs of electricity and natural gas, planning level construction estimates, and O&M
costs. Final results will depend on the variables which should be considered and
reconfirmed as part of any preliminary design of potential improvements.
• The evaluation will rely on the accuracy of record drawings and historical records
provided by the City. If drawings, data, or historical records are deemed to inaccurate,
additional field effort may be required. BC will alert the City if expanded field effort is
required over what was anticipated at the time the scope was prepared.
• For the wastewater characterization, the City will either conduct laboratory analyses
in house or will contract directly with a send-out laboratory to conduct analyses.
Shipping and analytical costs are not included in this scope of work. City staff will
conduct sampling and preserve, store, organize, and assemble samples for shipping
and/or analyses.
• Estimates of digester gas production, variability, and quality design criteria will be
based upon current digester gas production rates reported by the City relative to
volatile solids reduction (VSR), variability in gas production reported by the City and
any gas quality data provided by the City. Should information from the City be
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 9 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
unavailable, typical design values will be used. Final results will depend on the quality
and quantity of the data available from the City, and should be reconfirmed as part of
any preliminary design of potential improvements.
• Any permits (including air) and associated support beyond those identified may be
considered as additional services.
• The opinions of probable construction costs will be prepared to industry standards but
will be subject to many influences including, but not limited to, price of labor and
materials, schedule impacts, unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or
structures, and time or quality of performance by others. These types of issues are
difficult to forecast and are out of the control of BC and that actual costs may vary
substantially from the estimates prepared by BC. BC is therefore unable to guarantee
the accuracy of opinion of probable construction costs beyond that of industry
standards.
• The City will make available in a timely manner all drawings, records and site
information obtained relative to the project, including topographical survey, and
information related to any and all underground utilities, hazardous materials,
easements, permits, geotechnical investigations, lab data, environmental surveys,
etc. as necessary for completion of the work under the above detailed scope.
• The site does not have any environmental related concerns including contaminated
soil, endangered species, etc. that would impact alternatives implementation or
associated cost estimates. Environmental studies, including Phase 1 surveys or any
other type of study/survey are not included as part of this project scope. If any
regulatory agencies require additional studies be performed, they can be added as
additional services, but may impact the overall project schedule.
• The initial effort is limited to the cost identified in the attached fee estimate. If the effort
to complete the identified tasks exceeds the estimate, the PM will coordinate with the
City to identify areas we can limit our effort to the available budget.
• Recommendations for future improvements that relate to specific nutrient reductions
or other regulated requirements will be based upon our current understanding of
requirements for future permits as provided by the City of Meridian.
KEY PERSONNEL
Dan Berthe Zach Dobroth
dberthe@brwncald.com zdobroth@brwncald.com
(208) 389-7782 (208) 389-7728
Rick Kelly
rkelly@brwncald.com
(206) 749-2327
Dan Berthe will perform the administrative function including all program, policy, and
contractual issues. Dan Berthe and Zach Dobroth will be responsible for coordination
during the study phase and oversee all technical and project management activities
associated with the task order scope of work. Rick Kelly will provide technical oversight
and overall QA/QC.
Task Order 10022.a W RRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 10 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE
Task Description Estimated Completion Date Compensation
1 I Project Management ■ February 27, 2024 $96,870
1.1 Project Management Activities ■
1.2 City Workshops ■
1.3 QA/QC ■
2 Facility Plan ■ February 27, 2024 $394,053
Investigate Existing
2.1 Wastewater System
Conditions draft chapter ■ February 10, 2023
2.2 Subtask 2—Wastewater
Characterization draft chapter ■ March 27, 2023
Subtask 3—Capacity
2.3 Assessment Update draft
chapter ■ June 26, 2023
2.4 Subtask 4— Planning Criteria
draft chapter ■ February 17, 2023
Subtask 5— Liquid and Solids
2.5 Treatment Analysis draft
chapter ■ August 1, 2023
2.6 Subtask 6—Other Related
Evaluations draft chapter ■ April 24, 2023
2.7 Subtask 7—CIP draft chapter ■ August 29, 2023
2.8 Subtask 8— Facility Plan draft
report ■ January 16, 2024
Facility Plan final report ■ February 27, 2024
TASK ORDER TOTAL: $490,923
The Not-To-Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is
(four hundred ninety thousand nine hundred and twenty-three dollars) ($490,923). No
compensation will be paid over the Not-to-Exceed amount without prior written approval
by the City in the form of a Change Order. No travel or expenses will be reimbursed
through this agreement. All costs must be incorporated in the individual tasks within the
Compensation and Completion Schedule above.
CITY OF MERIDIAN BROWNANP CALDWELL, INC.
By: By:
KEITH WATTS, Procurement Manager MARTHA KNOWLTON, Vice President
Dated: 2-7-2023 Dated: 1/20/23
2-7-2023 City Project Manager:
Approved by City Council: Tyson Glock
Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 11 of 11
Brown&Caldwell
(:�4`WEDIANI."_*�Nio)
Purchase Order 2/7/2023 23-0198
Attention: Clint Dolsby
CITY OF MERIDIAN Billing Attn: Finance
33 Ave
33 EAST BROADWAY AVE. Meridian,
IDa
Address: 83642
MERIDIAN,ID 83642
(208) 888-4433
Shipping 33 E Broadway Ave.
Vendor Address: Address: Ste. 200
Meridian, ID 83642
BROWN & CALDWELL
PO BOX 45208
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94145-0208 Shipping Method: Contractor
FOB: Destination Pre-Paid
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
23-0198 TO 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Master Plan Update Dollar 490923.00 1.00 490,923.00
Purchase Order Total: $490,923.00
Purchasing
Manager:
Special Instructions
Task Order 10022.a WRRF Facility Master Plan Not-To-Exceed $490,923.00 60-3500-55000-10022.a Approved by Council
2/7/2023 Ticket#86568