Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-02-07 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, February 07, 2023 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Joe Borton Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Brad Hoaglun Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (Item 21 title corrected, Item 23 vacated) CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved as Noted Motion to approve all items except item 23 made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Borton. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener 1. ACHD Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement 2. Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 3. Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 4. Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 1 5. Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 6. Foxcroft Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 7. Ten Mile Storage Water Main Easement 8. Grocery Outlet LDIR-2022-0068 Water Main Easement 9. Inglewood Subdivision No. 2 Water Main Easement 10. The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 11. The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 12. The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 3 13. Outer Banks Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 14. Outer Banks Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement 15. Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 16. Settler's Crossing Partial Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 17. Victory Commons Full Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 18. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Modern Craftsman at Black Cat (H-2022- 0083) by Brandon Sheltrown, HB Architects, located at 4701 W. Caragana Ln. 19. Approval of Task Order 10022.a and Purchase Order No. 23-0198 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Facility Plan Update project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $490,923.00 20. Approval of Task Order 11367 and Purchase Order No. 23-0202 to Keller Associates, Inc. for the Water Master Plan Update 2023 project for the Not-To- Exceed amount of $348,750 21. Approval of Task Order 11281.d and Purchase Order No. 23-0199 to Stantec Consulting Services for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Tertiary Filter VE & Revised Preliminary Design project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $268,809 Chris will update agreement name 22. Professional Services Agreement between Eventageous Idaho, LLC and the City of Meridian for 2023 Meridian Main Street Market Event Coordination Services 23. Item Vacated Approval of KorTerra Locate Management Plus, Risk Management & Productivity Management Agreement for Line Locating Services to KorTerra for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $10,100.00 24. Agreement Between the Between the City of Meridian and the State of Idaho for Use of Ada County Juvenile Services Juveniles for Community Service by Governmental Agencies 25. Resolution 23-2370: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Adopting the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan; Authorizing the Parks and Recreation Staff to Implement the Master Plan; and Providing an Effective Date 26. Resolution No. 23-2371: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Patrick Grace to Seat 6 of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 27. City of Meridian December 2022 Financial Report ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 28. Community Development: Ada County Highway District Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities Adopted Motion to adopt priorities made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener 29. Human Resources: Update to City Standard Operating Policy and Procedure 4.1 Holidays ADJOURNMENT 5:36 PM Meridian City Council Work Session February 7, 2023. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:32 p.m., Tuesday, February 7, 2023, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun, Liz Strader and John Overton. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Miranda Carson, Scott Colaianni, and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_ John Overton _X_ Jessica Perreault _X—Luke Cavener X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is February 7, 2023, at 4:32 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is the adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: A couple of things on our Consent Agenda and before I make a motion -- Item No. 21 on your agenda, it should have the correct name on there. Stantec Consulting Services and so that's what we are approving tonight in Item 21. And, then, Item No. 23 -- have been asked to vacate this item per our purchasing manager. So, we are taking that one off the Consent Agenda. So, Mr. Mayor, with those changes I move approval of the Consent Agenda -- I'm sorry. I would move adoption of the agenda as published and corrected. Borton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second. Is there discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted as reflected by Council President Hoaglun's comments. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 2 of 24 1. ACHD Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement 2. Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 3. Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 4. Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 1 5. Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 6. Foxcroft Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 7. Ten Mile Storage Water Main Easement 8. Grocery Outlet LDIR-2022-0068 Water Main Easement 9. Inglewood Subdivision No. 2 Water Main Easement 10. The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 11. The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 12. The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 3 13. Outer Banks Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 14. Outer Banks Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement 15. Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 16. Settler's Crossing Partial Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 17. Victory Commons Full Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 18. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Modern Craftsman at Black Cat (H-2022- 0083) by Brandon Sheltrown, HB Architects, located at 4701 W. Caragana Ln. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 3 of 24 19. Approval of Task Order 10022.a and Purchase Order No. 23-0198 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Facility Plan Update project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $490,923.00 20. Approval of Task Order 11367 and Purchase Order No. 23-0202 to Keller Associates, Inc. for the Water Master Plan Update 2023 project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $348,750 21. Approval of Task Order 11281.d and Purchase Order No. 23-0199 to Stantec Consulting Services for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Tertiary Filter VE & Revised Preliminary Design project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $268,809 22. Professional Services Agreement between Eventageous Idaho, LLC and the City of Meridian for 2023 Meridian Main Street Market Event Coordination Services 24. Agreement Between the Between the City of Meridian and the State of Idaho for Use of Ada County Juvenile Services Juveniles for Community Service by Governmental Agencies 25. Resolution 23-2370: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Adopting the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan; Authorizing the Parks and Recreation Staff to Implement the Master Plan; and Providing an Effective Date 26. Resolution No. 23-2371: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Patrick Grace to Seat 6 of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 27. City of Meridian December 2022 Financial Report Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: For the Consent Agenda, I move approval of the Consent Agenda, for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest the amended Consent Agenda. Borton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 4 of 24 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item I Simison: There were no items removed from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 28. Community Development: Ada County Highway District Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities Simison: So, we will go into Item 28, which is Community Development-Ada County Highway District integrated five year work plan priorities. And where -- oh, there she is. I will turn this over to Miranda. Carson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Usually when I'm in a seat I'm saying Members of the Commission or Commissioners. So, I apologize in advance if muscle memory takes over. So, I sent out the prioritization draft with the change that was requested at the previous meeting to move Black Cat up to project number 20. 1 would also like to draw your attention to the description of that project. It has been expanded on -- I updated that description. It previously said install railroad crossing and I just made it more clear that we are looking for a gated railroad crossing and an enhanced pedestrian crossing at Aviator, which is the street for the Compass Charter School. Also included in your packet is the crash data from police on accidents -- pedestrian, bike, vehicle accidents within 2018 to 2022. 1 did not make any changes to the prioritization of the projects based on that information, but that information is shared for your reference as you decide what projects to move up and down. And at this point I can stand for any comments or suggestions on projects that need to be moved. Simison: Council, questions, comments for the feedback? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you, Miranda. I really appreciate your work on it and the police department's work on it. I guess -- so, for a couple of these I see that you guys did some research and, then, kind of connected -- for example, okay, we have had four crashes at Walmart. In the five year work plan there is a request to do a bike way. It's number 50. The ones where there is no work plan request, was it that we did not identify any enhancements that we thought would have helped those incidents or is it that we are just not reflecting any requests at this time? Carson: So, at this time there are no integrated five year work plan requests. As far as identifying improvements that need to be made, that would be a much larger effort than Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 5 of 24 we had the time for in the week that we had between getting this data -- this preliminary data and making any suggestions. Strader: Okay. I will just rant, if you don't mind. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you. No. That makes sense and I understand that there isn't a large time frame -- hasn't been a large time frame to do that work. I guess my request would be that going forward -- and I think, you know, with other work that's going on we can integrate this in, but, you know, when we have kind of connected, okay, you know -- you know, if we have a frequency of crash data at one location, then, I think -- especially if it's had a count of three or more, I would think it would be appropriate to hopefully find time -- even if it's after we have to submit this to ACHD, to work with police to read the reports and see, you know, is there a project that we can identify that we think would have helped with the pedestrian safety in this location. So, I guess I'm just requesting kind of some follow up so that this good work doesn't sort of fall through the -- fall through the cracks and even I think it could be something good to share, if we haven't already, with the Transportation Commission as they do this work every year. So, those are just a few thoughts that I wanted to get your thoughts on how we could use this data. Simison: Council Woman Strader, I was going to suggest that this be part of the work group that is being done with the school and -- you know. Because if you look at it, it was one of the areas where we had the most crash data. It is an area where there is like several intersections right there, Main, Cherry and Meridian. So, they would be evaluating that area, but what the crash data also doesn't say is what happens. You know, well, was -- was this someone coming out of I'm -- I'm going to guess the Main- Cherry there is one or two of those people coming out of the parking lot and someone walking across where the cars are entering in that area. I don't know for a fact, but I'm going to guess that that's what you are going to see. It's not necessarily a -- someone trying to cross and an issue of crossing even necessarily, from that standpoint. But they can look at that, they can -- they can pull the reports just like you suggest as they are looking at each of these areas to see what was -- you know, what occurred in that area, because it is right now just a dot on a map as we know. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you. Yeah. I think that's a great suggestion if we could do that going forward and, hopefully, we can, you know, fold this into that work. I would be really excited for us to do that and try to leverage the data. So, I appreciate you saying that. Thanks. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 6 of 24 Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I have a couple questions for Miranda and, then, I would like to make three suggestions to move some of these within the top 25 and however you want to go through those. I will leave that up to you. First question I have is number 19, Miranda had stated that there is not currently a project on this list to widen Amity from Meridian Road to Locust Grove, but when there does become one, the city would like to make sure that there is pedestrian and bike facilities included. Am I appropriately stating that? Carson: Yes. Perreault: So, I would propose that that not be -- if they don't currently have a project on this list, that we not put it in -- in an area where we will get -- where they are giving points for this year. Simison: Discussion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I don't have a question, but a comment directed towards Miranda and I think particularly number 19 specifically, I think the reason that we want it on the list is to keep it on the radar of the -- of the highway district. So, it's not about necessarily funding for this year, it is about keeping it on their radar for funding and part of their integrated five year work plan for years to come. I think a good example is improvements that we are seeing at Locust Grove and Victory right now, we were in a similar spot two years ago. We moved it up to get it to the place that the highway district paid attention to it and, then, they, then, move it into their five year work plan and construction has commenced. So, I hear where you are coming from on this and I really appreciate the philosophy. It's a little bit of -- this is kind of the rules of engagement when it comes to the highway district and so I -- particularly for 19 1 would be reluctant for us to move that down this year. Certainly next year if it makes it under their five year work plan we could maybe move the numbers then, but I would like to see 19 kind of stay where it is personally. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. I appreciate Councilman Cavener's points on that. I -- I -- I think there are other priorities that are possibly more likely to get funding sooner, so maybe I'm just not understanding how -- how they are going to, you know, give points to these. And in that -- in that same line of thinking Miranda had stated last time that they will weigh some of the priorities from the school district in addition to what the city has prioritized. So, I would propose that we move number 11 through 13 up to above eight Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 7 of 24 or nine. I understand that eight and nine are already in the CIP and that they possibly won't be moved, but they have not been designed yet. So, I don't know if -- I realize that the green ones are already in -- you know, in -- in ACHD's priority list, but they haven't been designed yet for another couple of years and I personally believe that 11 through 13 are a higher priority for us. That's just something I want to propose. Simison: Comments? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess I -- I would like to hear some feedback on if -- you know, if it's in the programming design phase how does -- how do we impact that or do we impact that at all by kind of reprioritizing? Anything that's already in design I don't really want to move off if it's going to set something back, just because we know it takes so long to get funding and design for any of these projects, but -- I mean one thing I could see us doing would be maybe, you know -- not to like pit them up against each other, but an example might be Ten Mile and Cherry. That's not in design. I think a better conversation might be how does 11 compare to, you know, 13 and 14 or -- or something like that. But I just -- I'm a little hesitant to try to move something out of the top ten if it's already in design and getting funding, just because it takes so long to design and that's just some feedback. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. I appreciate that. Just for clarification, Miranda, if -- if it's not in -- none of the one -- none of the projects in seven, eight or nine are in design yet. They don't start until 2025. So, what does that mean? They haven't committed any funds yet or like -- I'm under the assumption that it's still movable if it's not -- if it's not in design until 2025. Carson: Mr. Mayor, Council Member, that is a decision that ACHD makes when they set their budget. So, at the integrated five year work plan that they approved when they sent us this list, that was already programmed. How they decide to move things out of programming and move other projects in I'm -- I'm sorry, I don't have any answer for that. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: If I understand this correctly, we should be taking their programming into consideration, but this is really about Meridian's priority list and this is what we are Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 8 of 24 communicating to the public is our priority and I feel like that's a little bit more important than us trying to guess what ACHD is going to do -- ACHD is going to do with -- with their five year integrated work program. So, that's kind of -- that's where I'm coming from with it. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yes. It is our priority list and that's why I would kind of like to keep them there, even though they don't have any dates by him yet. It goes back to Councilman Cavener's point about you get them there -- these are our priorities and this is what we want to see and now they have to work on that and decide, okay, how can they make that happen to our wishes and that's -- that's why they ask for this input. So, to change that and just do it for things that are funding I think is less -- it takes away the critical list that we see as a council and community for the top projects that we want to have funded. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just some added context to -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I think what Miranda is saying is that oftentimes -- like let's take, for instance, number nine, Victory, Meridian Road to Locust Grove. It says in there that it's designed at 2020 -- at 2025. Because of our placement it very well could come back next year based on decisions of the highway district and maybe it's going to be designed in 2024. Based on our priority list the highway district oftentimes will move the program years around based on our priority. So, by -- by leaving some of these things where we -- they are, even if they are showing as so far out into the future, because we have placed a higher priority on them in the past the highway district has accelerated their calendar to meet some of our needs. So, again, I kind of tend to agree with Council Member Hoaglun on kind of leaving the list as is. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Okay. So, I just want to make sure I'm understanding that McMillan is not a higher priority than the widening Locust Grove between Amity and Victory, Victory between Meridian and Locust Grove, which is not a very busy area. I just -- I guess I'm trying to understand -- like is there agreement from a transportation standpoint that -- and depending on what we are looking at. Are we looking at safety? Are we looking at traffic count? Are we looking at -- what is the -- what is the priority that we are -- that we are discussing? If we are discussing traffic count, my guess is that 11 through 13 have a higher count than the other. But I'm not a traffic specialist. So, if we are discussing safety, McMillan has a major safety problem. So, I guess -- I mean I don't know, I'm Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 9 of 24 looking at the map here and if it looks at those -- if I look at those in relationship to schools, you know, all of -- all of them are somewhat close to schools, but I guess -- guess I just want to understand -- and forgive me if I'm speaking out of ignorance with this, but I just want to understand what is it about seven, eight and nine that are taking priority over what -- what is the -- what's the purpose from Meridian's standpoint? Is this -- is this trans -- is it because the transportation committee recommended it? Is it -- like is there something else that I'm not seeing that I should know about it? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Council Woman Perreault, I think the context that may be missing -- and as someone who is a huge advocate for McMillan, this is going to sound surprising coming from me, but the whole thought process I think in the last few years was to do the whole corridor of Locust Grove at -- in -- in a relatively compressed time frame. The transportation commission's feedback has always been if we just do parts of a whole corridor we are not going to move the needle on the traffic issues. If we treat the corridor at once, which you can see in the prioritization that Locust Grove is in almost all of these projects, that was the reasoning that I recall last year and the year before behind that was to try to do that whole corridor at once. I think McMillan is a huge priority, I just don't want to upset the applecart on a series of like ten projects that they seem to have in the queue. I would be more of a fan of -- you know, if there are a couple of these, like Ten Mile and Cherry, or Eagle and Overland we could have a discussion about, you know, McMillan versus those I think is a better discussion. But I -- I don't want to upset the whole -- the whole Locust Grove corridor just because -- unless the thinking of everyone has changed, but that definitely was the feedback that I remember all of us coalescing around. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. I appreciate that. I --just leave that one for now. I -- I'm just one person. I'm not in agreement that Locust Grove is as high of a priority, but, like you said, it's too complicated to move on the list. So, this -- I had the same question about 21 through 23. 1 appreciate the parks looking forward to that section, but we don't have -- we don't have funding in place to my knowledge for Cherry Park yet and so I -- having those in the top 25 -- I think there is other possible projects that might be better placed. Simison: Just on the park, I mean it is -- it is planned in the CIP, but it's also been planned for 20 years, you know, as the next park, but I think that with the timing of the sewer it is more viewed as likely in this time frame, so -- but just so you know, it is the next major thing on Park's radar to accomplish. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 10 of 24 Cavener: Council Member Perreault, do you have a recommendation as to what you would want to move up over 21 , 22 and 23? Perreault: Quick question before I answer that for Miranda. Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. Sorry, Mr. Mayor. Numbers 24 through 29 where they say defer, that's ACHD's deferment that -- in other words, they are saying this is operating appropriately and we don't need that in -- we are not prioritizing that at all or we are -- we would prioritize this less than -- is that their way of saying we will put this at the bottom? Carson: Wouldn't speak for them -- Mr. Mayor, Council Members. I wouldn't speak for them to say it's at the bottom, but I will say deferring the improvement is -- it's not in their integrated five year work plan right now. It's being deferred until the level of service, which is the performance rating that they use is -- until it's not operating where it needs to be and right now as -- from when they wrote these notes -- traffic counts it was operating where it needed to be. I hope that answers your question. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: It does. Thank you. And the reason I asked that is because of number 28 and 29. 1 would think that we -- I would like to see those moved up, because the school is there and because they -- it's -- it's already in the -- in the CIP. So, I'm not sure I guess why -- why that's ranked lower than many of the other projects that are also in the CIP that -- that are higher priority for ACHD. Does that make sense? Hood: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Hood, Hood: Maybe hopefully add a little bit of value and maybe a recommendation. I think this is a good maybe sub topic for your joint meeting with ACHD in a couple of weeks, too. Council Woman Perreault, you even brought up, you know, different people look at things with different importance. What you see here and why ACHD is deferring these projects is the level of service primarily, not safety, not cost, just that it's functioning okay from whatever lens they are looking at that through. So, I think that's something, if Council wants to, you could have a better understanding from ACHD of all the things that go into their considerations when they scope a project and they go we are deferring this for now. It's not as simple as just level of service, by the way, but I think having an understanding that they do look at safety and they do look at cost, they do look at right of way impacts, they look at all those things and go right now this isn't the time, there are other things that score higher on the priority list. Just to better understand how they Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 11 of 24 factor in things. We don't have to do it that way; right? This list is a little more -- can be, if you choose it to be, a little more political. This can be, hey, we are factoring in things that aren't as black and white as cost or right of way impacts or whatever those things are. So, we could potentially reach out to ACHD and do a little bit of -- if -- if that's what Council wants to do, spend a few minutes at the joint meeting upcoming to get a little bit better understanding and, then, maybe even advocate for -- I know it's been a hot topic recently -- pedestrian safety and so we think that should be moved up on your hierarchy of things to consider when you scope a project and decide if it should be deferred or not. Traffic may be moving fine, but there is a bunch of crashes with pedestrians, isn't that more important than traffic moving fine? So, anyways, just -- some of your questions are very complex. There is -- there is a lot that goes into this, both at the city standpoint and from a technical review side that our transportation commission does. We can give you that information -- you asked a question earlier. We can give you the information that goes into how this list came about and the level of service they are looking at and the crash data and those types of things and you have already talked about some of that. From my perspective historically again some of this is -- is you looking at a higher level -- not getting into the weeds so much with the engineers and -- and that, but really just saying, hey, I know of this school and I know parents that have called me or e-mailed me and said this is a concern. I want to move this up. You know, it's not based on data necessarily, so -- but -- but ACHD is -- they have got to -- they have got to play, you know, fairly with all of the cities in some of their analysis. So, they do have a pretty rigid scorecard when they look at these things -- okay, there is capacity on that roadway. We aren't rebuilding it. Don't care about crashes as much. There is capacity. I'm oversimplifying that, but -- anyway, just -- just, again, saying we could potentially work with ACHD if there is room on that agenda, Mayor, and maybe get a ten or 15 minute thing on just their -- their programming and everything that goes in and, then, how we can do a better job of providing some of that insight into the highway district that really does -- I can't remember if it was Councilman Hoaglun or a couple of them. No, this is our -- is our priority list sort of absent all the ACHD stuff that they have to look at to do it; right? This is Meridian's priorities based on what we know and understand. How can we help that at ACHD. Simison: Caleb, I like your suggestion even just how they have to view it and score it. So, Council and Commission would have that for next year. I do think there is room personally, but -- Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I agree a hundred percent. Caleb, I think it's a great suggestion and part of the value of this process -- your comment about keeping it at a high level is an important one. This -- this priority ranking has some slow inertia to it year over year as we look at it and things purposely don't move wildly up and down. I also appreciate the process. think process is key as to how it's created and maintained for the work of the Transportation Commission and our staff. The granular detail you have talked about for Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 12 of 24 me weighs very heavily in support of the recommendations presented. Also the reality that, you know, the things above 20 are somewhat academic, whether it's 30 versus 35 or 28, all of that for me goes into supporting the recommendation to the commission. The dialogue you have described would be extremely valuable to help understand how this moves and doesn't move year over year. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Thank you, Caleb. None of these get on this list without any discussion. would hate to see us move anything that's already on the programmed list or something that we think is important right now. That's why they got on the list to begin with years ago. I would not be in favor of taking anything off the program list as it sits. But, again, I think we need a bigger explanation down the road on exactly how they get to be there, along with -- all of us can make it more clear. It's a good process with a lot of moving parts. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you, Councilman Overton. I -- you know, this is -- this is a list that is reflecting the city's priorities and if I'm a resident I'm asking the same -- I'm -- I'm not playing devil's advocate. I'm truly asking questions that I want to know the answer to, but also if -- if I'm trying to understand all the moving parts and all the things as we are making this decision, then, members of the public are going to ask the same question. So, I think it's good for us to have -- to have -- you know, as we have had this discussion last -- at the January meeting and now, I wouldn't have any idea why Meridian has these in the order that they have them if I'm a resident and so, you know, I think that's -- it's really good for us to discuss this on the dais and -- and for there to be clarity for us as a team to all be on the same page about how the decisions are made and, then, not sort of give the response of -- I understand that there is a process. understand it's a multi-year process. And I understand not moving things to -- to not taking place markers out that we have been working on for a long time, but I also want to make sure that we are appropriately reflecting our priorities and that's not just left in the place that it's left in, because we think it will get -- how do I say this? We kind of go, you know, yeah, that needs to be done, too. Yes, these are -- this is all -- this is -- this is tough; right? And there is -- all of these have merit. I just want clarity for our public as to why we are choosing one or the other and to only have 20, maybe 25 to get to prioritize, that's tough. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 13 of 24 Borton: We have seen -- Caleb, we have seen -- or, Miranda, we have -- we have seen in prior years the ACHD -- right? This is a piece of their bigger puzzle and their bigger puzzle shows the objective matrix; right? The cost and the level of service and the -- trying to compile projects together and that -- that list of factors were one little piece of it. It's something that even if it's a prior one that you can send around to us again that at least shows us the measurements that they are looking at. Carson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, that is something I can send out. I will say as far as timeline, that this list is required back to ACHD by February 15th. They did update their methodology from the prior methodology. So, I can definitely send out the presentation of what their new methodology for scoring is when they scope these projects. Those projects, then, receive a score and, then, that score is one piece of the programming. So, then, the programming looks at grouping projects and doing things based on funds. But I can send you the information I have on their scoring for the scope and, then, we can ask them, as Caleb said, to speak on their actual programming process. Hood: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Hood. Hood: If I can take that just a step further. And, then, if we want to, after the joint meeting, after we get you their current scoring -- hear from them at the joint meeting and, then, if Council wants to say, well, we -- now we understand better how ACHD does their process. Transportation Commission next year when you do this will you, please, make this -- you know, ACHD does what they do with their points, but we value safety. Don't look at level of service as much, put more weight or value in -- when you send us your -- our list this is the hierarchy of things to consider for us. We could do that; right? I mean, again, ACHD is still going to have their spreadsheet with all the other things, but if we say, you know, number one concern is stop controlled intersection in our elementary schools, we want to see those signalized, the expectation is those are the top few -- we can do that; right? Now, ACHD factors that into their big to Councilman Borton's point, you know, it scores about this much. Our -- you know -- yeah, 15 percent of the overall score of a project, which doesn't easily move the needle too terribly much on stuff. You still got to have the technical merits to warrant them investing millions of dollars. But if we want to say this is more important and you aren't giving them enough points in our priorities -- to the public's question, how can this one be a higher priority than that one? We could at least explain it. Hey, this -- there is crashes here in our elementary schools and we don't like that idea. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I feel like there is a good opportunity in the community programs list as well; right? Because that's kind of a different -- they are aligned, but it's a little bit of a Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 14 of 24 different bucket and I would say it does make sense to look at -- you know, is there -- for example, are there -- is it appropriate to have a change in those priorities, you know, related to Owyhee High School as just one example or -- there are a couple of others that, you know, we could certainly discuss. I guess my -- my question for Council Woman Perreault would be, you know, are there any particular projects or any feedback that was specific to a school site that you think would be better reflected on the community programs list prioritization, as opposed to the wider corridor; right? Like if we widen the road we are going to do the pedestrian facilities, it's all going to be wrapped in together, so it's going to get done. But if it's in the top -- I assume it's similar that if it's in the top ranking of community programs that it's programmed, it's designed, is going to get funded. So, that might be another -- if you have a particular concern that might be another way to tackle it. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you, Council Woman Strader. Not other than the concern that we have -- have discussed with Compass at Black Cat and then -- and, then, clearly McMillan and -- and, you know, some of the sidewalks for McMillan are in the community programs, but it -- I agree that there doesn't necessarily seem to be a prioritization link between the two lists, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. And so I think like that -- that's a good example where maybe we -- we want to diverge a little bit, because of the logistical challenges with the canal seems to make it very difficult for ACHD to prioritize widening McMillan and that's just a physical reality. I'm assuming that is a cost component for them and so they have continuously said to us that's not happening until like the 2030s. So, maybe that's where there is an opportunity and we should take a look at the community programs and McMillan -- that touch McMillan and where they are listed here and see if moving them in priority makes more sense. If we think that those -- if we -- if we unfortunately think McMillan is not going to be widened for a long time because of the reality of the canal, if we just face that fact, we could keep it, it is still a priority. We think they should do it, but maybe those -- some of those community programs get accelerated up a little bit. So, that's maybe one thing to look at and, then, I guess the other -- the other piece would be, you know, with Owyhee High School I think that it just seems like a reality that that should be better prioritized within community programs, but I guess a question I have is unless there are specific changes identified now, does it make sense to have our joint meeting and, then, we can give them feedback where you want to tweak it or do we just have to submit it by the deadline. It is what it is. Live with it. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 15 of 24 Carson: Mr. Mayor? So, to answer that question we -- we need to commit the list to be submitted to ACHD by February 15th to be scored in the scoping process. But there is an opportunity after they program the request to comment on the integrated five year work plan draft. So, then, if there is any drastic changes that the city saw needed at that point I would see that as Council's opportunity to comment on the integrated five year work plan draft before it's adopted by the commission. Hood: Mr. Mayor, can I put maybe another finer point or an opportunity there as well. think we could follow up as staff and -- in the meantime, because Miranda is right, the 15th is a pretty hard deadline. We don't want to miss that. We want whatever we send -- unless we are just not comfortable sending this. We can't wait longer. But we can in the coming weeks after that follow up with their staff and say, hey, you know what, since we sent you that list we are really hoping this project maybe is even higher. You know, if we get some of that feedback from Council after the joint meeting, we can supplement some of that. The initial draft, Miranda is right, we will bring that back to you and say, hey, this is where these -- this is how it's kind of shaking out. Do we want to -- but I will be honest, that is pretty late in the game, too, and they usually don't make drastic changes. So, if we are looking at -- we are going to have these focus areas, for lack of a better term right now, Owyhee High School and we are going to look at McMillan maybe a little differently than when we do the rest of the corridor -- even our community programs listed as a whole, we can follow up with their staff kind of, you know, off the record, if you will, or after the fact and just say, hey, as you are doing this maybe -- maybe -- maybe flip flop these a little bit or -- or, you know, something to that effect. So, I will just offer that as well, that if something comes up in the next couple of months we can -- we can supplement whatever list we send this week to them with some of those -- that follow up. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Understanding that we have got our deadline that we have to submit this, there is nothing -- we don't have to wait until next year to do this again. We can start next week working on what this list is going to look like next year and start reevaluating our priorities now for how we want this list to look the next time we submit it and when we have the new meetings we are going to have on intersection related safety and how we are going to do that, as well as our joint meetings coming up, I think there is a perfect opportunity for us to start now looking at what we are going to do next year. When we see this -- this not going to be changed other than what we just listed. We can take that opportunity with Miranda and start immediately putting that together. I think we can probably configure and attack this next year, instead of being in a position right now where we are trying to decide what we want to do. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 16 of 24 Hoaglun: I do think there will be impacts, like Owyhee High School is having -- if you go two years before that high school was approved and look at the list it was probably a little different than what you see now and we have had -- had growth. When Highway 16 opens that's going to change the dynamics quite a bit and we know our traffic is impacted by a lot of people who don't live in Meridian coming through Meridian going to their destinations. When Linder Road overpass opens down the road here a ways, that will have an impact that will influence this list. So, it's always going to morph I guess is the word I can use is it's going to be morphing as other things come into play and factor in. So, I just -- we will give it our best shot and hit those areas that we think need to be done and maybe we will have a couple of things that move up and down a little more quickly than -- than they typically do, but definitely know what these priorities, which have been put into place over time and input by a lot of people, and we just have to keep that ball moving forward and know how the rules work, so we can be in the ballgame on that. Simison: Thank you. You know, my hope and I'm crossing my fingers and toes, but I'm thinking that our number one project is actually going to be what gets funded and put on the program. You know, it's currently not in the program. So, if our number one project gets in, pretty much nothing else is moving. You know, we may see something else a little bit, but that's an expensive project that's a challenge for ACHD to program that. So, if we are lucky our number one moves forward. Everything else it's good to have, but it's likely not going to see a lot of movement or a lot of change unless they are just trying to -- they have something that's so cost effective that it's the balance that it might get programmed otherwise, but that's what I'm hopeful outcome of this process we will see what they put into the five year work plan. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Is this list something to move and adopt today or is it a resolution next week? Carson: Mr. Mayor -- sorry. It's looks like Mr. Nary had something to say. I don't have a resolution to adopt. They do ask -- ACHD does ask that elected officials vote. So, do ask for a movement to adopt this list and, then, we will submit a letter with the Mayor's signature as a cover letter that just kind of explains our priorities here and submit that to ACHD next week. Nary: Mr. Mayor, I was going to say the same thing. They don't require a resolution, so I think just a voice vote. Simison: So, with that do I have direction the Council would like to officially take? Hoaglun: Yes, Mr. Mayor, I was going to ask is if -- do we want to do that tonight or did you want to wait -- I -- my preference is just to take care of it now. I think we have Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 17 of 24 hashed this out for this year of what we want, so we can move it forward and let staff get the letter prepared and signed and off to ACHD, so -- Simison: That would be my preference personally. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Then I would move that we adopt the 2023 ACHD roadway priorities and community program priorities as presented from the Planning -- excuse me -- from the Planning Department. Overton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? They ayes have it and we will transmit this draft priorities to ACHD and we will get more information, have the workgroup that will help evaluate and also, Mr. Hood, Miranda, Councilman Borton had a good idea. As we move into this next year it might be good to bring the chair of the Transportation Commission or the subcommittee -- the chair who, you know, works on this next time it comes before Council, to help answer some of these questions, so they have that view. I know you do it, but sometimes it's also good to have them say it directly. Carson: Okay. 29. Human Resources: Update to City Standard Operating Policy and Procedure 4.1 Holidays Simison: All right. Thank you. With that we will move on to Item 29, which will be an update to the standard operating -- operating policy Procedure 4.1 holidays that Mr. Nary is going to present to the Council. Nary: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. So, what I have before you is a change to the holiday policy and how it's been applied. So -- a little backstory. So, we have had the same holiday policy in place for a long time. I probably wrote it. I don't even remember it was that long ago. So, we had a fairly static policy of these are the holidays we have, these the holidays we recognize, these days off we have. A few times a year we have a glitch there. We have a Friday holiday. We have a midweek holiday for our Veterans Day. So, we have varying work schedules by varying workgroups for operational reasons. So, we have four tens, we have nine eights, we have shift work, we have a variety of different ones. So, most people have programmed their lives to deal with Monday holidays. That has never really been problematic to anybody and many of our work schedules that are varied incorporate into that and deal with that. Some people don't get those holidays off anyway. They don't get those days. The CLA deals with those separately for the Fire Department. The people that have to Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 18 of 24 work on the holiday because we have to have people in the police cars and we have to have people on call. We have to have people available on certain days after work and they get paid for it. So, that's how we have handled it. Back in 2011 our controller at the time Rita Cunningham crafted an e-mail that I am a hundred percent certain she consulted with me on it and I don't remember. It was 12 years ago. So, what that allowed is because we had a few limited people that worked in positions that weren't critical to working on the holiday day itself would -- wanted to shift their holiday. So, they weren't in emergency services, they weren't in a fire, they weren't in on call, they weren't treatment plant workers. They were folks that just have their work schedule where Friday was their normal holiday -- or their normal off day. So, they asked, in those limited circumstances, if the director could allow them to basically take their holiday on Thursday instead of Friday and, then, they are off on Friday. Financially this is how we handled it from the city's end. They worked ten hours on Monday, ten hours on Tuesday, ten hours on Wednesday, they get a holiday and they -- that's it. They get paid for 30 hours of work and ten hours a holiday. So, that's been going on for 12 years in some departments. We discovered that and we had a conversation with the departments to figure out why are we doing this -- and they had been referring to this as the Rita rule and I don't know if -- if Council Member Overton remembers this reference, but that's the Rita rule that they have been applying in some departments for the last 12 years to allow that. Here is the benefit to the city. If we don't do that, one, it -- two things. It makes people feel good. It makes them feel like they got a holiday. That their day off wasn't just their day off anyway, so everybody else got the day off, too. So, that was one -- one reason I think the question came up. Secondarily, if we didn't do that, then, this is the way that would get paid, ten hours for Monday, ten hours for Tuesday, ten hours for Wednesday, they don't take -- they don't take ten hours on Thursday, so they work Thursday. They get paid ten extra hours on Friday, because they get paid for their holiday anyway. So, you get 50 hours of pay that week. All of it straight time. There is no overtime for that. But you get paid actually more. No one, to our knowledge, has gamed the system to do that. Most people either want the holiday or they don't care and so it hasn't been an issue. It is occasionally people that -- and it only normally is going to apply primarily to nonexempt employees. So, hourly employees. With the -- with the people that are already exempt it really doesn't make a lot of difference. They get paid the same no matter whether they had the day off or they don't have the day off. It doesn't really make any difference. So, anyway, we had a conversation and, basically, as we looked at the policy and the procedure, the discussion amongst the directors was they felt it was more appropriate to allow the departments to have that level of flexibility for those minimal amount of employees that this impacts, will allow them to have the holiday on a different day that same week. It has to be within the work week. It can't be flexed up to another day. It has to be within that work week. But managing it based on operational need is what they did. And one of the things that we put in there -- and we actually got a little bit of question back was on the procedure page under -- under Roman numeral two, it says department director approval and it's probably one of the few places in there that we didn't include designee and we didn't do that for a specific reason. What we didn't want is this supervisor says okay, that supervisor says no, that one says yes, you have -- or however many shifts the police department has and they say you can't, you can't, you can't, and, then, that's Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 19 of 24 just completely disjointed and nobody wanted to do that. Finance didn't want to do it. Tracking in a time card. Nobody wanted to do it that way. So, it's like, okay, the department director has to say, yes, they can for a discretionary reason like, again -- and, again, primarily this affects people that are in nonemergency positions. So, you don't get -- you know, again, police officers to get paid on holidays. Firefighters get paid on holidays. They just get paid. It's just part of the job. They get it. I don't recall we have ever had pushback from people in those positions saying I should get my holiday. They got paid for it. They had to work. That's the job they have. So, that's never been an issue. So, that's what we are proposing to you. As you know here -- you know, this was one of the procedures that when we went through this rewrite a year -- was it a year or two? A year. Yeah. A year ago that this was one that the Council asked specifically, hey, if we want to change it come back and ask. So, that's why we are here. We would like to change it and I will stand for any questions. Simison: And if I could add, it was written in a way to allow this -- when we did the rewrite it got written in a way not to allow it and, you know, my direction to the -- you know, I'm -- I think policy is a good thing and like, no, we either need to get the policy changed or we are not going to have the practice, so -- Nary: And to follow that up, Mr. Mayor, part of the reason we are here now is we have a holiday this month. So, finance asked if -- if we are going to do this can we get this done in front of the holiday, so we don't run into this -- again with this -- people now having previously been allowed to do it, now not allowed to do it and, then, causing that sort of heartburn for a few people, so -- any other questions? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. Just one quick question under holiday and leave status 6-B. just want to understand the thinking behind not providing holiday pay if there is an unpaid leave day before or after the holiday. Nary: Oh. Great question, Council Member Perreault. So, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, that was one -- I do specifically recall that and it was to, again, not incentivize those weekends. If you wanted to take vacation you can take vacation. But what they didn't want is people building on that. We have had -- we have had situations over the years where employees have tried to take advantage of those situations, call in sick before holidays, you know, take a vacation so that you have a longer time period with a free one in the middle of it. So, that was the whole intent was just to make sure people understood that a holiday was a holiday. It's just a day and you get it. And, really, the conversation primarily over the years has been is a holiday of benefit or is a holiday a way to make sure your check remains whole? And I don't know that we have answered the question very well either way. I mean it does feel like a benefit, but, again, you don't get paid for it. I mean if you were to leave and you didn't take your holiday, you don't get paid for it. So, it isn't a benefit in that sense. Like -- like -- like leave time is. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 20 of 24 Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: So, if there truly was a situation where an employee took unpaid leave for a legitimate reason, but they would have been able to return to work on the holiday, but the City Hall is closed let's say for example, does that person just lose another day of pay? Nary: No. They would get paid for the holiday. They would get paid anyway for the holidays, because we -- we do have to pay them for that. It was, again, trying to avoid a system where people were trying to take advantage of the time off they were having. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I wanted to ask a question. Many workplaces now have a concept of a floating holiday and I think there is a lot of merit to that. Is there anything that would prohibit an employee from -- for just asking for department director approval as an accommodation to substitute holidays? For example, we have an employee that doesn't celebrate one of these holidays and has another holiday that they don't normally get off where they would be able to ask their director for approval to take a different day off instead? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Strader, that's a great question. That's never come up that I'm aware of. I think that's a great thing we should explore, because we are trying to be a much more inclusive workplace and you are right, not everybody celebrates these exact holidays. You know, we did delete, prior to my coming, the Columbus Day holiday, which is not frowned upon anyway. But also we used that to allow for a holiday for the day after Thanksgiving. But you are right. Yeah. We had never talked about that. Floating holidays can sometimes be difficult to manage from a management standpoint. We have done it very rarely. We did it the year -- we recognized Juneteenth, because it was done so quickly that we allowed that one to be a floater for some people, but I think we -- we can certainly begin that conversation about is that something we should reconsider, because you are right -- you know, the -- the question almost becomes problematic, because someone will say, well, I would work because I don't celebrate Christmas, but we are closed. So, there is nothing for you to do anyway. So, you know, I think that's going to probably go back to the same conversation. Again, is this paycheck -- is this a way to retain your paycheck or is this a way to give you a benefit of recognition? I don't think we have an answer today. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 21 of 24 Strader: Yeah. I would suggest this as a future topic to explore. Certainly I think you would have to have a lot of limitations around it. Where I have seen it be successful in workplaces is usually when it's limited to one or two or like a director -- like exception. But that being said, I think there is a lot of merit to looking at that, you know, and there are some -- there are some rules where I think where it could be accomplished, even if the office is closed, depending on whether someone's doing remote worker or what have you. Certainly in some cases it's not possible, but in some cases it might be. So, don't know. I mean maybe a -- maybe a floating holiday citywide or something that would allow people to celebrate other holidays would it make sense. It was just a suggestion. Nary: Sure. Strader: It just prompted the thought in my mind reading the policy. Nary: We have come a long way from when I first got here that the holiday practice prior to my coming in this position in '04 was if you had a ten hour shift, which some of our employees did -- not just public safety people, but some other types of people -- if you wanted to take a holiday and the City Hall is closed, and definitely for you to come to work, but you had a ten hour shift, they would give you eight hours of holiday and take two hours of your vacation and you couldn't come to work anyway. That never made sense to me, it didn't make sense to Mayor Tammy, and we changed it, because your day is whatever your day is. Whatever your schedule is is what it is. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I do you remember that, the Rita -- I also remember when we used to have all of our holidays banked and we used them as a rotating vacation time of 80 hours when we had fewer holidays back then. Now we have more. But that was I think one of the reasons that that was eliminated had to do with a staffing issue. Now we were piling on not only better -- just giving our employees more vacation -- when we had one or two weeks and that was it. Once we went through the system we have now that we have a lot more holiday time -- in the past few years we went away from banking the holidays, because it did become a staff -- especially employee services trying keep enough police on the road. Don't know again if that's something that wants to be discussed, but it's an issue if you start floating holidays on different parts of the city on staff and I would open it up to Captain Colaianni to say what he's got now on staffing at the police department and what kind of effect that would have on them. Nary: And I will add to that, Councilman Overton, the -- in the CLA for the fire union employees it is a bank system, because they have to work whether it's a holiday or not. It doesn't make any difference. They change their schedule slightly on holidays and they operate a little bit different functionally, but they have to be there, so they just get it as a bank and they just use it as part of their bank like that old system used to be. Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 22 of 24 Simison: Captain. Colaianni: I'm not sure if I want to throw another log on this fire. Since I have been here since 1996 it's been done a ton of ways. We used to -- you were just given eight, ten holidays a year in October and you used them whenever you want it to at your discretion. If you didn't use them and you left the city you didn't get paid for them. We used to do it that way. We used to have a system where it didn't matter if you worked ten, 12 hour shifts, you only got eight hours a holiday and we -- we moved through that. And, then, we moved into this format now and it's weird, because holidays are moved by the city. So, if Christmas is on a Sunday we moved the holiday to a Monday. So, the people that are working Christmas get the same amount of straight time is equal to the holiday, but they are actually working the holiday. So, there is -- there is that. I'm working the holiday. I'm working Christmas. I'm not with my family and the person that works Monday where the holiday is moved to gets the same amount of pay. They don't feel it's equitable. So, there is that issue. And, then, there is the issue that Council Woman Strader brought up -- or, excuse me, Council Woman Perreault brought up about if you are sick or taking vacations through no fault of your own and you have something planned, how does that compute when it comes down to calculating hours, because we have some people that are sick or do they lose it? Where does that -- there is -- there is just a lot of layers to it on how we do it. But we used to just get a bank of them and this is it and use it as you see fit. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I definitely wasn't recommending a whole bank of floating holidays. Where I have seen it be successful is it's typically limited to one or two and sometimes it's a religious accommodation, but not necessarily. So, that -- that would be the thing I would urge you to look into. Not necessarily a wholesale change in -- in moving to banking completely. I think that would be a big change that would be hard to implement and manage city wide. Nary: I would agree. And one more thing I can add, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, was back to Council Member Perreault's question. We were having a problem for a period of time with some employees that didn't feel the necessity that they have to work 40 hours a week. They could afford to go with unpaid time. And so for a while we required to be a full-time employee you have to schedule 40 hours a week. This particular language here was also to address that. So, that you didn't have people saying I don't care if you pay me, I will take the day off. You don't have to pay me. That's fine. And, then, they -- and they are not using vacation. They are not using sick leave. They are using unpaid time that they chose to use and when I was the HR director I don't know how many times I said to the department just tell them no and some people were better at that than others and some had more groups -- it wasn't my -- it wasn't my person, so I don't know what their personalities were. But I think it's one of those things that we -- we have tried to address this as fairly as we can, we tried to Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 23 of 24 do it -- this particular one -- like I said, I think it was a great intention, because, again, I think people just felt like -- I felt like I lost something. Even if I get paid an extra ten hours, I don't feel like I got the day off like everybody else did. And so I think it was a way to address that and, then, when we looked at it from the math standpoint financially it actually cost us less to do that. But it would be just pay them extra. So, our intention was if -- if the Council is in favor of it I will put a resolution on for next week for approval so that we are in front of the next holiday and, then, we will just go from there and I think -- at least from the director team, I think generally they were in favor of it, because, again, it gives the level of flexibility when it's necessary and it doesn't -- like I said, it -- the ones that it probably comes up the most often are the employees who normal scheduled for off day is a Friday and the Friday is the holiday or it's a weird day, because it's a Tuesday or a Wednesday or a Thursday, which would have been their normal off day, depending on what shift they worked. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Bill, you touched on a couple of times, you know, kind of the conversations with the director, which I think is an appropriate place for this conversation to also emerge, but do you -- does the city have an employee engagement group that can also be shared with, recognizing that the perspective of a director may be different than an individual employee and I think we all -- these questions come as we are also trying to see it from both, you know, management, as well as rank and file and I don't know if that's something that has ever been explored to seek that perspective or how -- how we make sure that these changes are also in line with what our employees are looking for. Nary: So, yeah, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Cavener, great -- great question. And, no, we don't have an employee group like that. Again, these don't come up very much. So, you know, when we created the -- revised the policy manual last year we did create a process and the process does require how it gets initiated, who has to vet it before it comes to you folks to look at. So, we have built that in. We don't really -- I mean we have a benefits committee, which is probably one of our broadest based committees of varieties of workgroups, but they talk primarily about benefits and not about this particular -- particular type of policy. You know, we have a compensation committee. It's a little bit smaller and it's a little bit more management driven and it really drills on to compensation and not necessarily other things. So, yeah, we hadn't ever explored that. Certainly I don't have a problem with that. I don't think that's a bad thing to consider. How we would do it -- you know, whether or not -- again, we expand the benefits committee, because it already exists to looking at stuff like that, too. Because there is -- most workers are represented. I mean we have Police, Parks, Public Works, Legal, HR, Finance -- all are part of that. So, that might be a way to just do that, to make sure, like you said, if there is something else that we have just are missing. We hope -- again, most of the directors have vetted it somewhere in their department to get a sense of what makes sense for their folks and at least my Meridian City Council Work Session February 7,2023 Page 24 of 24 experience with the director team currently they do and so I do think it's out there, but, again, I don't think it's wrong to look at another way to do it. Simison: And I would just add in this case I think this is here because employees came to their director and this is what they want in this specific instance. I don't know the directors are out there trying -- you know, advocating for this policy otherwise. Nary: Correct. I would agree. I will go ahead and bring it back next week. Okay. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Bill. So, with that we have reached the end of our work session. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move we adjourn the work session. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:36 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 2-21-2023 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 2-21-2023 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: ACHD Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007825 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 11:46 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0017 ACHD Facility at 2023 Franklin Road Water Main Easement WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement is made thislh_day of Febuary , 20 23 between the Ada County Highway District,a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),the City of Meridian,an Idaho municipal corporation("City"),and Veolia Water Idaho, Inc., an Idaho corporation("Veolia"). City and Veolia shall be referred to collectively as "Grantees"herein. WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water mains, interconnect vault, and appurtenances are to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for Grantees to maintain and service said water mains, interconnect vault, and appurtenances from time to time; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantees the right-of-way for a non-exclusive easement for the operation and maintenance of said water mains,interconnect vault,and appurtenances over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains, an interconnect vault, and appurtenances, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantees, with the right of access, with notice provided to the Grantor as practicable,to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantees, their successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantees shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantees shall not be responsible for repairing,replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. Water Main Easement Page 1 THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantees that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs,personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: � l STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on ►� ,1� (date) by .k�, •1 t'�.�:�T�.J (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of tytN C,�, (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative +D\�`q.,� capacity: \� _. � ivL +pe of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) �••� P 6AK��ti, Notary Signature �5••.•••••••.••F My Commission Expires: r.•�o?A R y,�A :. ICa, AY 0 No.20 y''•.,..OF..••••� Water Main Easement Page 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2.7.2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2.7.2023 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2 7 2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Page 3 VEOLIA WATER IDAHO,INC. STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on '4'sha- (date) by (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Ac^uca-(type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) e,euem[�teara Notary S'gnature i =`PAN® IC,+y0�.,�, My Commission Expires.CH l�-�_, �. �-t;o. 2o2r %C -j;0TAity o:Q °z_ s° OFSe��,,. Water Main Easement Page 4 EXHIBIT A WATER EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO &VEOLIA WATER IDAHO An easement located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,and being a part of PARCEL IV as shown on Record of Survey No. 12070,recorded as Instrument No. 2019-108209 in the office of the Recorder, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap monument marking the southwesterly corner of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, from which an aluminum cap monument marking the southeasterly corner of said Section 9 bears S 89'14'44" E a distance of 2702.81 feet; Thence S 89'14'44" E along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 a distance of 1068.52 feet to a point on the extension of the westerly boundary of said PARCEL IV; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0'40'35" E along said extension a distance of 42.00 feet to a point marking the southwesterly corner of said PARCEL IV, said point being on the northerly right-of-way of E. Franklin Road; Thence S 89'14'44" E along the southerly boundary of said PARCEL IV and said northerly right-of-way a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing S 89'14'44" E a distance of 56.95 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly boundary and said northerly right-of-way N 0'45'16" E a distance of 35.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89'14'44" W a distance of 57.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0'40'35"W along a line 60.00 foot distant and parallel to the westerly boundary of said PARCEL IV a distance of 35.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; This parcel contains 1,994 square feet (0.046 acres an j is subject to any other easements, existing or in use. OWN, S. Prepared by: Kyle A. Koomler, PLS O Civil Survey Consultants;October 18, 2022 18780 0 EXHIBI T B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY WATER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AND IE-OL IA WATER IDAHO LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP J NORTH, RANGE I EAST, NOISE 114 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO h 42.00' N n¢0 3s"E P/L 41 0 � o POINT OF BEGINNING � I � SCALE.• 1"=40' v S 0'40'35" W lu � a PARCEL /V h RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 12070 l� J5.00 N N 0145760 E EASEMENT LQ Q ^ � 18780 16- j 9TE' O.f ,4P !�. K 013: P/L I� I 1 J a Q CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC, 16 3 2893 SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD •- -- MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 15 JO (208)888-4312 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007754 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 ANGIE STEELE 02/08/2023 09:18 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE S T- 03-0007 Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 THIS Easement Agreement, made this7th day of February 20 23 between BD &B Investments, LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS; it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities; together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all tunes. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way-unto the said Grantee, it's`successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However; Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 ESMT-2023-0007 Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this7th day of February ?p 23 between BD & B Investments, LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors,assigns, heirs, personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: BD & B Investments, LLC STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on lan- 1b�r3L-Qj (date) by Blake Da le (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacio,] on behalf of Rr) R, g invactmPnt, i I c (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Manager of authority such as officer or trustee) W0 I �V, AF a i SgSlgr Notary Signature .g28.202B s My Commission Expires:, a Sanitary Sewer and t REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires. : 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 k1m E N G I N E E P. I N G December 15,2022 Bountiful Commons East Subdivision Project No. 21-224 City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement(1) Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement situated in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Bountiful Commons Subdivision (Book 115 of Plats, Pages 17336-17339),further situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 25,which bears S00°55'15"W a distance of 2,657.84 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 25; Thence following the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, N00°55'15"E a distance of 1,180.64 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,S89°04'45"E a distance of 307.03 feet to a found 1/2-inch rebar marking the Southwest cornerofsaid Lot 1; Thence following the southerly boundary line of said Lot 1,S89'24'37"E a distance of 14.50 feet to the easterly line of an existing City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2018-098357 and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said southerly boundary line and following said easterly easement line, N00°19'53"E a distance of 15.74 feet; Thence leaving said easterly easement line,S89'24'37"E a distance of 197.05 feet; Thence S00°35'23"W a distance of 15.74 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar on the southerly boundary line of said Lot 1; Thence following said southerly boundary line, N89°24'37"W a distance of 196.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 3,101 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. All subdivisions, deeds, records or surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. NNk- LAND S Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \r,INs£ o� 16662 OF 0P�� << Y KENO 5725 IJorth Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com EXHIBIT B LEGEND ® FOUND ALUMINUM CAP QO FOUND 5/8" REBAR O FOUND 1/2" REBAR CALCULATED POINT SECTION LINE 23 24 BOUNDARY LINE ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINE 26 V5 — _ _ _ _ __ FOUND ALUMINUM CAP — EASEMENT LINE TNORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 25 1'�LZZ7i]] PROPOSED EASEMENT AREA J I L I EXISTING CITY OF MERIDIAN 1-0 SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT PER INST. No. 2018-098357 4 Lot 2 I Lot 1 I S89'24'37"E 197.05' _ _ I _ d / / 1N5.7 49 53 E 7 � 00'3523W� S89'04'45"E / 15.74 307.03' (TIE) N89'24'37"W 196.98' z�lc`o I I�POINT OF BEGINNING -6QQg-I o I S89'24'37"E 14.50' l Ji [�JJ °0 Q1CNI r =`off L Lot 3 Block 1 Lot 4 _Iu,0 Bountiful Commons Subdivision u, Lo I cai zQtn , i N m O o N I POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 26 WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 25 p�Nt LAND a ge �\cENSf3 SG�` 25 16662 r �O c �9T£ OF ,OP 3 �F<< Y KEH��� r W o p 0 50 100 150 Plan Scale: 1" =50' N N N ENGINE ERI N G 0 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY W BOISE,IDAH083713 PHONE(209)639-6939 Bountiful Commons East kmengllp.com City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement (1) DATE: December2022 PROJECT: 21-224 SHEET: A portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Bountiful Commons Subdivision, a 1 OF 1 SW1/4 of NW1/4 of Section 25,T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho �1 I Title: Date: 12-08-2022 Scale: 1 inch= 50 feet File: Deed Plottendes Tract 1: 0.071 Acres: 3101 Sq Feet:Closure=n81.1209e 0.00 Feet: Precision>1/999999: Perimeter=426 Feet 001=n00.1953e 15.74 003=s003523w 15.74 002=s89.2437e 197.05 004=n89.2437\v 196.98 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007753 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 LINDSAY WHEELER 02/08/2023 09:17 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0008 Bountiful Commons East Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 .SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7thday of February 20 23 between ..TMEG ProDerties,LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the sight-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water _mains and their allied facilities; together with their "maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the-said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's°successors~and assigns forever: IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance: However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed'within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial drubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: TMEG Properties, LLC STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Aia ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3 (date) by .Trevor Gasser (name of individual), [complete the following if*signing ill a representative capacity, or strike the follolving if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of TMEG Properties, LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:_Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) s' My COMM MON Notary Signature ? ; EXP►RES9-28-2028 ; My Commission Expires:��� Sanitary Sewer and VV" Fnt REV.01/11/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 E N G I N E E R I N G December 15,2022 Bountiful Commons East Subdivision Project No.21-224 City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement (2) Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement situated in a portion of Lots 1 and 4,Block 1 of Bountiful Commons Subdivision(Book 115 of Plats,Pages 17336-17339),further situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 25,which bears S00°55'15"W a distance of 2,657.84 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 25; Thence following the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4,N00°55'15"E a distance of 1,180.64 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,S89°04'45"E a distance of 307.03 feet to a found 1/2-inch rebar marking the Northwestcorner of said Lot 4; Thence following the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4,S89°24'37"E a distance of 14.50 feet to the easterly line of an existing City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2018-098357 and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said northerly boundary line,S89°24'37"E a distance of 196.98 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar; Thence leaving said northerly boundary line, N00°35'23"E a distance of 15.74 feet; Thence S89°24'37"E a distance of 22.32 feet; Thence S00°19'52"W a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence S87°03'57"W a distance of 219.72 feet to the easterly line of said existing City of Meridian Sewerand Water Easement; Thence following said easterly easement line, N00°19'52"E a distance of 27.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 4,962 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds, records or surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. %r,E NSF D G 662 f 9` Of \�P� F4YKEH\ 11-All 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com EXHIBIT B LEGEND ® FOUND ALUMINUM CAP QO FOUND 5/8" REBAR O FOUND 1/2" REBAR 0 CALCULATED POINT SECTION LINE j6V 4 BOUNDARY LINE —____ __ ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINE 5FOUND ALUMINUM CAP — EASEMENT LINE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 2-�ZZZ7_I:l PROPOSED EASEMENT AREA I J I EXISTING CITY OF MERIDIAN I®-�-yL:7—SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT oN 1 , PER INST. No. 2018-098357 Lot 2 r- J Lot 1 S89'24'37"E SEE ETA S89'24'37"E 14.50' 22.32' D IL POINT OF BEGINNING N00'35'23"E S00'19'52"W I S8_9'04'45"E S89'24'37"E 196.98' 15.74' d-30.00' 1 j307.03' (TIE) 09N01152"E 22 zz aD cD 217.1�� 1 L � O S87'03'57"W 219.72' CD 0 -o I �Lot 3 Block 1 ES J�;n I— -7 Fj Bountiful Commons Subdivision Lot 4 v) i ! I 0 z<to m O o N NI DETAIL SCALE 1"=20' Lot 1 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 589'24'37"E FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 26 /WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 25 J�PL LANDS, ; T22.32'T x 25 �,�CENSFD G.p` n j rr o ," F a O `. 1 i� M o S89'24'37"E 589'24'37"E = 6662 211.48' _ /22,39' U- o LP �� N in/ /ZC 0) ¢ Q Lo a r Y KEG 197.23"' Z /22.4���cn S87-03'57"W 219.72' a Lot 4 0 0 50 100 150 i' Plan Scale: 1"=50' E N G I N E E R I N G m 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY W BOISE,IDAH0'3713 PHONE(208)139.,139 Bountiful Commons East kmengllp.com N City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement (2) DATE: December2022 • PROJECT: 21-224 SHEET: A portion of Lots 1 and 4, Block 1 of Bountiful Commons Subdivision, 1 OF 1 SW1/4 of NW1/4 of Section 25,T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho li J Title: Date: 12-08-2022 Scale: 1 inch= 50 feet File: Deed Plottendes Tract 1: 0.114 Acres: 4962 Sq Feet:Closure=s48.1849%N,0.01 Feet: Precision=1/68961: Perimeter=513 Feet 001=s89.2437e 196.98 004=s00.1952w 30.00 002=n00.3623e 15.74 005=s87.0357Nv 219.72 003=s89.2437e 22.32 006=n00.1952e 27.77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007755 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 LINDSAY WHEELER 02/08/2023 09:18 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0011 Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February, 20 23 between � Odl lCF•� �5, ("Grantor% and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water'main-right-of way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly`bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, ;it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto; that t after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. i< r i THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees,brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within°the area described for this easement, which would:interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated } herein. I THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby:granted shall'become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any k I i` i Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 i- public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) I ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on In,W,)Ol 'date) by_ .rl�l (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of _OD9, Dba,,fje^¢r. lj-r, (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: /1/We^4,bP-1- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) 4 Notary Signature AOAIR KOLTES My Commission Expires:_P) -)6A Notary Public- State of Idaho Commission Number 30052 My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk - - 023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada j This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 f f }r 1 s Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 Exhibit A Description for Water Main Easement Foxcroft Subdivision January 7, 2023 A portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 114 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 10 from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section 10 bears South 89036'02" East, 2655.68 feet;thence on the east-west centerline of said Section 10, South 89°36'02" East, 1,682.06 feet;thence leaving said east-west centerline, thence South 00023'58" West, 43.78 feet to the south right-of-way line of W. Pine Avenue and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence on said south right-of-way line, North 8719'37" East, 20.03 feet; thence leaving said south right-of-way line, South 00023'58" West, 21.05 feet; thence North 89°36'02"West, 20.00 feet; thence North 00023'58" East, 19.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 410 square feet or 0.01 acres, more or less. End of Description. f I F 9{f� E N.S G I 11779 1/1��3 ��p9r" OF \�P o� Y41 M cC N�` Page 1 of 1 t Exhibit B Scale: t"=204' 0 50 100 200 400 n� VIPER INVESTMENTS LLC tier, BASIS OF BEARING S8936'02"E 2655.68' .. Point of L1 � 1682.06' _�EEEBeginning L2-973.61' 1 4 W. Pine Ave. C 1/4 S,YO 5,11 SA O L5 L4 L3 -ci OPEN DOOR COREY RENTALS LLC BARTON a�i MILE HIGH r- �? -� PINES SUB. z oNNL LA LINE TABLE 5� �%cE.NS `� ` LINE BEARING LENGTH_ o L1 SO'23'58"W 43.78 11 T23 9 � L2 N87'19'37"E 20.03 L,VZ j `QQ L3 SO.23'58"W 21.05 0 of o YM M cC N L4 N89'36'02"W 20.00 L5 NO'23'5B"E 19.98 EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR roe IDAHO 2'-159 9955 W EMERALD ST. WATER MAIN EASEMENT SHEET NO. SURVEY BOISE,M HOa070a 1208)US-8570 FOXCROFT SUBDIVISION y, L GROUP, LLC A PORTION OF THE NEl/4 OF THE SE7/4 OF SECTION 10. T.3N., R.M. D,M, OWO. DATE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY. IOAHO 1/7/2023 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007756 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 CHE FOWLER 02/08/2023 09:18 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0012 Foxcroft Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 2023_ between ✓Inle5 P � ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee); � WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground,pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE,inconsideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto,that after making repairs or performing other'maintenance, Grantee shall restore the.area.of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described.in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement: THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement,;,for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs, personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) - - ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on,34n.I-,}O (date) by ✓2ec� Ct►�' ✓t (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative ca ad , or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of_Vi Der Zhuoo,. e- (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: cam- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary ignature My Commission Expires: h ADAIR KOLTES Notary Public- State of Idaho Commission Number 30052 [My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 I Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTEE:- CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2-7-20 3 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was aclinowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E, Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 Exhibit A Description for Water Main Easement Foxcroft Subdivision January 7, 2023 A portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 10 from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section 10 bears South 89036'02" East, 2655.68 feet; thence on the east-west centerline of said Section 10, South 89°36'02" East, 1,677.06 feet; thence leaving said east-west centerline, North 00°23'58" East, 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 00°23'58" East, 44.20 feet; thence South 89036'02" East, 25.00 feet; thence South 00"23'58"West, 44.20 feet to the north right-of-way line of W. Pine Avenue; thence on said north right-of-way line, North 89"36'02" West, 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,105 square feet or 0.03 acres, more or less. End of Description. 5 %GENSF 4 11779 �o of r� McCp, Page 1 of 1 Exhibit B 11J Scale: 1"=200' 0 50�100 200 400 VIPER INVESTMENTS LLC 2� BASIS OF BEARING S89'36'02"E 2655.68' L3 1/4 1677.06' _ _978.61' _ W: Pine Ave. Point of s.10 L5 V y 0 1/4 Beginning Ll 5.10 S.11 ro OPEN DOOR °3 n•�^ COREY RENTALS LLC BARTON MILE HIGH o �F, PINES SUB. �NPL LA ryp LINE TABLE 5� ENSF sG�� LINE BEARING LENGTH 1779 O I L1 NO'23'58"E 25.00 L2 NW23'58"E 44.20 NP �O TF �aQ L3 S89'36.02"E 25.00 �pM�`° L4 SO'23'58"W 44.20 I L5 N89'36'02"W 25.00 EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR JOB NO. IDAHO WATER MAIN EASEMENT 21-159 SURVEY SOME,IVMERALDST. SHEET N0. (8;8assi0e"Q4 FOXCROFT SUBDIVISION 1 GROUP LLC A PORTION OF THE SEl/4 OF THE NES/4 OF SEC110N 10, 7.3N-. R.M. B.M., DWG. DATE CITY OF MERMAN. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1/7/2023 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Foxcroft Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007826 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 11:46 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0010 Foxcroft Subdivision SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EA EMENT T141S Easerpent Agreement, made this 7thday of February 20 23 between _(Aelq &ran ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal orporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to :maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good''and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the. Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property; (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the. Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the :said Grantee, -it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs' and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: t STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on , .I3�1013 (date) by _(^y✓✓P,•t PpAr+" (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: D,j 5 r,tnl (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) ADAIR KOLTES Notary Signature lJ�� Notary Public- State of Idaho My Commission Expires:_,�7�OJ'��'6 Commission Number 30052 [MyCommission Expires 06-05-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 Exhibit A Description for Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Foxcroft Subdivision January 7, 2023 A portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 10 from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section 10 bears South 89036'02" East, 2655.68 feet; thence on the east-west centerline of said Section 10, South 89036'02" East, 1,093,56 feet;thence leaving said east-west centerline, thence South 00°23'58" West, 45.00 feet to the south right-of-way line of W. Pine Avenue and the POINT" OF BEGINNING; thence on said south right-of-way line, South 89036'02" East, 38.50 feet; thence leaving said south right-of-way line, South 00°23'58"West, 58.09 feet; thence North 89036'02"West, 38.50 feet; thence North 00123'58" East, 58.09 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,236 square feet or 0.05 acres, more or less. End of Description. 3 z NN. LgNa 11 79 U',A'I"7 Z.23 ra V0 '6� OFN��p� rM MccN, Page 1 of 1 # i E E Exhibit B Scote. 1"=200' 0 50 100 200 400 c� VIPER INVESTMENTS LLC R o BASIS OF BEARING ....... S89'36'02"E 2655.68. 1 1/4 1 1093.56' 1562.12' C 1/4 Lt JL2 W. Pine Ave. S.10 Point of ,n �^ SA O S.11 Beginning -� � f L4 a OPEN DOOR v CO RENTALS LLC BARTON MILS' HIGH PINES SUB. \oN0- LA s LINE TABLE NSF LINE BEARING LENGTH 'I1 79 � Lt sa•23'5$"w 45.00 ( L2 S89.3COVE 38.50 `pJ�7.7�23 C) 0. 9J� ` P L3 SO.23'58"W 58.09 o �or- Oo Y MCCP� L4 N89'36'02"W 38.50 L5 NO.23'58"E 58,09 ^ ' EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR JOB 159 IDAHa SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT 2,ET99 8955 W.EM6RALD3T: SHEET N0. SURVEY 8O1S�1pANO837"' FOXCROF'T SUBDIVISION i .� a (2081�848-8570 CROUP, LLC A PORt10N OF THE 14Wt/4 OF THE SEI/4 OF SECTION 10, T.3N.. RAW., B.M., DWG, DATE CITY OF MERIDIAN. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1/7/2023 f E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ten Mile Storage Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007776 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 ANGIE STEELE 02/08/2023 09:50 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0016 Ten Mile Storage Water Main Easement Number: l WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 20 23 between SCS Brighton Ten Mile storage LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. [END OF TEXT;SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW] Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTOR: SCS BRIGHTON TEN MILE STORAGE LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: Brighton Corporation,an Idaho corporation, Manager By: A �- Robert L. Phillips, President STATE OF IDAHO } :SS. County of Ada } -4A On this, 6 day of January, in the year of 2023, before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Robert L. Phillips, known or identified to me to be the President of Brighton Corporation,the Manager of SCS Brighton Ten Mile storage LLC, the Company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said Company, and acknowledged to me that such Company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first written above. (stamp) d &'bt vL� SHARI VAUGHAN Notary Public Notary Public-State of Idaho My Commission Expires:_& Commission Number 20181002 My Commission Expires Jun 1, 2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2.7.2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2.7.2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 km E N G I N E E R I N G January 24,2023 Project No.20-209 Water Easement Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a Water Easement over a portion of Lot 4,Block 1 of Frontline Subdivision(Book 124 of Plats, pages 19876-19879), situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 14,which bears N89°13'12"W a distance of 2,657.79 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said Section 14,thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,S89°13'12"E a distance of 347.83 feet; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00°46'48"W a distance of 686.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S89°09'21"E a distance of 5.00 feet to an existing Water Main Easement as described per Instrument No.2022-006436; Thence following said existing Water Main Easement the following two(2)courses: 1. S00°50'39"W a distance of 27.51 feet; 2. N89°09'21"W a distance of 5.00 feet; Thence leaving said existing Water Main Easement, N00°50'39"E a distance of 27.51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 138 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions, deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. LANs \'\ry E N SFD Gn � o 0' 6 s� �o qTF 0 F \�P HOS 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639,6939 • kmengllp.com P:\20.2091CAD\SURVEY\EXHIBITS\20-209 WATER EASEMENT ADDITION.DWG,BILL HYNSON,1/24/2023,DWG TO PDF.PC3,09.SX11 L[PDFi A N moo Z O I I S. Benchmark Way 0 m z I — z z Mn rrI z m O z 0 cn N 0 W J W � Ln O J z rri �I'R _>� Tr I I I N O n1 _ S00'46'48"W M 77 z 686.66' (TIE) 9 cn z - 1 CD _�z O c (Q -0 N v Z 0 rr*rtr rrl J O D O -I 0 0 X - O cD O i0 I ? I I N z 0 L4 r-q m I I I0-0 Z I . IC);� Z I �Z� I �Z M I m I !I I I I I z I I I I I I •o , PROF I I I I I . N FS m I . �0 a�S 0 c m c x D m D 0 -Ln �_I 9 < m g c z Z c' r� z O o U7 -� = O O Z r� A N z Z D O N "� -^ y z p � r- m r I- � o o�'' o m Z r m Linder Rd. ' m oC m m z N N D r D < z 1 m O r O Z m rn Ln s D0 NZ M ° m Exhibit B oa=ci =4a- Water Easement oa=z o - v m=nrn -� 3 m A portion of Lot 4, Block 1 of Frontline Subdivision,situated in the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 b W K — z o of Section 14,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, ID � � w E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Grocery Outlet LDIR-2022-0068 Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007757 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 ANGIE STEELE 02/08/2023 09:19 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0003 Grocery Outlet LDIR-2022-0068 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 0 23 between 10 vv,Ae, ` 't. . —� l ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee'�); WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by ethers; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain ,and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor+does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-ref-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property. (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance;; repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all tithes. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way canto the said,Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. 1T IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,that after making repairs or performing ether maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prier to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement, THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place;or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein:. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall;become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/ 0 0 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of YOLO On 01 DECEMBER 2022 before me, VICKIE S. REYES, NOTARY PUBLIC, (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared MARK L ENGSTROM who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. VICKIE slo REYES Z'" COMM, #2a23030 Notary public.California Yolo County o Comm.Ex Tres Oct 23,2t�b Signature (Seal) WATER EASEMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN/IDAHO MUST CORP.. GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Water Main Easement. Version 01/01/2020 �- THE GATEWAY ( J•U B LANGDON ®. MAPPING GROUP INC. J•U•B ENGINEERS,INC. J-U-e FAMI OF COMPANIES EXHIBIT"A" ENGSTROM PROPERTIES CITY OF MERIDIAN 20-FOOT-WIDE WATER MAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A water main easement located in a portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an Aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter(N1/161h Corner) of said Section 15,from which a Brass cap marking the northeast corner of said Section 15 bears North 00°33'16" East, 1,329.09 feet; Thence North 00`33'16" East along the east line of said Section 15 for a distance of 189.44; Thence leaving the east line of said Section 15 along a random line, North 86°26'32" West, 71.52 feet to west right-of-way line of South Ten Mile Road, said point also being on the northerly right-of-way line of West Cobalt Drive at a point 37.00 feet northerly of the centerline thereof, when measured at right angles;Thence continuing North 86°26'32" West along said northerly right-of way line for a distance of 76.47 feet to the beginning of a curve; Thence continuing along said northerly right-of way line, Southwesterly, along the arc of a 337.00-foot- radius, tangent curve to the left(the radius of which bears South 03°33'28" West)through a central angle of 06°25'11" for an arc length of 37.76 feet,the long chord of which bears North 89°39'08" West with a chord length of 37.74 feet;Thence leaving said northerly right-of way line, along a random line, North 00°35'24" East, 5.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement to be described; Thence continuing North 00°35'24" East,32.65 feet; Thence North 89°24'36" West, 73.73 feet; Thence North 66°34'36" West, 80.38 feet; Thence North 44°24'36" West, 33.80 feet; Thence North 45°35'24" East, 6.53 feet; Thence South 89°37'30" East, 6.89 feet; Thence North 00°22'30" East, 20.00 feet; Thence North 89°37'30" West, 15.13 feet; Thence South 45°35'24" West, 14.77 feet; Thence North 44°24'36"West, 36.79 feet; Thence North 89°24'36"West, 19.14 feet; Thence South 00°35'24"West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 89°24'36" East, 10.86 feet; Thence South 44°24'36" East, 86.22 feet; Thence South 66°34'36" East, 88.33 feet; Thence South 89°24'36" East, 57.77 feet; Thence South 00°35'24" West, 12.65 feet; Page 1 of 2 2760 West Excursion Lane, Suite 400,Meridian,ID 83642-5313 www.4ub.com 208.376.7330 �B ® THE GATEWAY r` LANGGON MAPPING GROUP INC. J•U•R ENGINEER$,INC. J-U-8 FAMILY OF COMPANIES Thence South 89°24'36" East, 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 5956.3 square feet, (0.14 acres), more or less. This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. Lallo 4JohShea,WPLS 15528 �i���6\S rfR sG� 0 d2-Zo-zOZZ OP Date v� OF J , S� �z"Za-ZoZZ Page 2 of 2 L10 L8 EXHIBIT "B" 10 11 �9 L7 15 14 (o J L12 L5 S 9 L4 id SsF` �66 34 8 3g•. Sg63 33 38' W N89'24'36"W f 4 3 y 73.73' 8 F -j POINT OF BEGINNING I o �d L13 �-L1 N L14 / C1 — 76.47 71 r L15 N86'26'32"W 14j 99, i. a� rn o G0lO � ao 0 �d N LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH L1 NO'35'24"E 5.71' L12 S89'24'36"E 10.86' SE CORNER NE1/4 NE1/4 L2 NO'35'24"E 32.65' L13 S89'24'36"E 57.77' (N1/16 CORNER) L3 N44'24'36"W 33.80' L14 SO.35'24"W 12.65' L4 N45'35'24"E 6.53' L15 S89.24'36"E 20.00' 0 60 120 L5 S89.37'30"E 6.89' + L6 No•22'30"E 20.00' SCALE IN FEET J L7 N89'37'30"W 15.13' L8 S45'35'24"W 14.77' L9 N44'24'36"W 36.79' ZO Zo1Z L10 N89'24'36"W 19.14' t2, �Q.L LAND �� SG L11 SO'35'24"W 20.00' C�> \STf� F� 0 CURVE TABLE �o P CURVE# LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH vO lF OF Q, C1 37.76' 337.00' 18.90' 6'25'11" N89'39'08"W 37.74' �s CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET SITUATE IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 15, T3N, R1 W, 1 OF 1 -u-sen,�in,eeRs,iNe. BOISE MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNTY OF ADA STATE OF IDAHO E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Inglewood Subdivision No. 2 Water Main Easement - / ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tri,,Ie 2023-007758 / BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 CHE FOWLER 02/08/2023 09:19 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0004 Inglewood Subdivision No. 2 "WATER MAIN EASEMENT, THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of Febraury 20 23 -between- ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); ,- WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and " WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and - - i WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of---way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water plains --over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance; repair and replacement at the , convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's ' successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto;that after making repairs or performing other maintenance; Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and - maintenance. However;Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring , anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. i --THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement / Version 01/01/2020/ , public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their _,,--signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: SC OV L-c �//WNk��rN-� �✓N4el� STATE OF-FB�Al-IO ) U}a1% ss County of.-Ada Lq Ve- This record was acknowledged before me on S 23 (date) by JgmeS 9e—+et-Sop Y,% (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of _SEC O g LIZ (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Mck naq;v-q rneW%be--- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) ''� TEAL LAROQUE Nplary Signat NOTARYmmm-STAIEOFURN My Commission Expires:—OJ 31 2-0Z-j COMMISSIONe 717502 '••• COMM.EXP.03.31.2025 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF 1DAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) 20237- This record was acknowledged before me on 2- _ (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 EXHIBIT 'A' A 20.00-foot by 24.00-foot parcel of land situate within Lot 2,Block 1,Inglewood Place Subdivision No.2, situate within the Southwest Quarter of Section 21,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, located in Meridian City,County of Ada,Sate of Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of a 30.00-foot access easement, shown on said Inglewood Place Subdivision No.2, said point being North 0°00'25" West, along the section line, a distance of 340.31 feet, to a point of intersection with the westerly projection of said South line of 30.00-foot access easement, and North 89°59'35"East,along said South line and the projection thereof,a distance of 155.28 feet,from the Section Corner common to Sections 20,21,28,&29,CPF&R Entry No.:111000681;and running thence North 89°59'35" East, continuing along said South line, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence South 0°00'25" East, a distance of 24.00 feet; thence South 89°59'35" West, parallel with said South line, a distance of 20.00 feet;thence North 0°00'25"West,a distance of 24.00 feet,to the point of beginning. Contains:480 square feet. 5�0 LA EN F� a 13889 A u'J 01/04/23 Q �'S�9TF OF FG D. NOS �n MCNEIL ENGINEERING-SURVEYING,I..C. McNEIL ENGINEERING-ST.GEORGE,L.C. i N II N N I W PRO 3 3 m 0 0 � , a P w� 0 � ^ �Y o xzz �' W rn N n z man I 0 O A Z m o —¢'°0co o A Z -'n �z (p) n �-0� �A% y oW* A' o n = p0z0 m = ^1 IV *dCt r y A r w 0 I A m z Y n co C r � DoD I r ' 3 II C2 I CD rn o rj II 3 c rn ' j `= W ~ N 89"59'35"E 155.28' _ _ N 89"59'35"E 20.00' z r o n _ —— _ � � to 0 rn Z o m w M o o �. X z o to o � Z o z = m K� z0 02 `N m z y I z m T m W n A to a a „r I o o < r S 89°59'35"W 20.00' 41. I I wP I� �� O co nM 7171 3 N cn g m mW Iw z t- -I 0—I 0 �o r m z m w z = I� z 0 o m co n �z, � = m z � I m z m O w m a Mz0 n 0 Z m z I n n T .�i Q.=_2 x ' 0 ? m o > I O ?;;jzcn z m ;ZmQ n r o o > z �\ r �ON �v_ - 20 �_ E.VICTORY RD. _ 2829 (96.0'WIDE PAVED PUBLIC ROAD) m W o INGLEWOOD PLACE SUBDIVISION NO, Q McNEIL r5 m GOLD STREAM PARTNERS ENGINEERING o o Designing for the Future Since 1983'" ►r N o LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 21 8610 So.Sandy Parkway,Suite 200 Sandy,Utah 84070 TEL(801)255-7700 FAX(801)255-8071 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 EAST]BOISE MERIDIAN E-MAIL.(801) oQmcneileng.rnm WEB SITE ATwww.mcneil-grnup.com E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007834 BOISEIDAHO Pgs=5 ANGIE STEELE 02/08/2023 11:49 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0009 The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water in Easement No. 1 aAMIARX UAL4=AA311k MAO,LAU'Aflul THIS Easement Agreement, made this7th day of February 202-3 between Toll southwest LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others-, and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement, Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV,0 1/0 1/2020 ESMT-2023-0009 The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 SANlTARX-,UAL4ANiQ&A.UJ&NlAlN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this7th day of February 2023 between Toll southwest LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.0 t/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers,or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: P/,n Hammons, Division President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on jllKI Q-. (date) by _Byan Haf:Ta.m„ :� -(name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of_Toll southwest I I c (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Division Prosidont ofabitharity type such as officer or trustee) KYLE Notary Public RS ate of Idaho '" Commission Number 20223246 Notary Signature My Commission Expires Jul 7, 2028 My Commission Expires: 0 7/07/2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires- Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 Legal Description City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer & Water Easement The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 An easement being located in the SW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 28,from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of the SW% (S % corner) of said Section 28 bears S 89016'58" E a distance of 2635.25 feet; Thence N 1°00'42" E along the west boundary of said SW '/4 of Section 28 a distance of 2494.89 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary S 89'21'17" E a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the easterly right- of-way of N. McDermott Road, the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said right-of-way and continuing S 89021'17" E a distance 60.00 feet to a point; Thence S 1°00'42" W a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89°21'17"W a distance of 60.00 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way of N. McDermott Road; Thence along said right-of-way N 1°00'42" E a distance of 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,800 square feet (0.041 acres) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Land Solutions, PC ONPL LA NOS January 13, 2023 5\ s T E L 11118 X A 01 I 13 0 F TAN W N P� The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 ��. Land Surveying and Consulting City of Meridian Sewer&Water Easement A Job No. 18-35 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER & WATER EASEMENT THE OAKS NORTH SUBDIVISION NO. 12 LOCATED IN THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 28, TAN., R.1W., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 29 28 C 1/4 S89'21'17"E 2622.24' _ 0 I� o011 S�gO I � o z N POINT OF BEGINNING S89'21'17"E I 60.00' N 25.00' S89'21'17'E w Ir N1'00'42"E F—S1'00'42"W 30.00' I _ 30,00' N89'21'17"W Z 60.00' _b 1800 SF / 0.041 ACRES ZIN 29 28 BASIS OF BEARING 28 32 33 W f►Ar_tlAll I AN Rf1Al1 S89'16'58"E 2635.25' 33 1- 1/4 \ONNL LA/VDS O a. 111 m 0 F tiToN W.NPR 0' 40' 80' 1 J60' ��'Oac'a Lan Solutions Land Surveying and Consulting 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz JOB NO, 18-35 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: yan Hammons,Division President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on It19/23 (date) by Ryan Hammons (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual behalf of Toll Southwest LLC (name of entity on behalf of whomcrgaw y]xeFt executed), in the following representative capacity:Division (type Prestdieni of authority such as officer or trustee) FMyKYLE PREWM Le Notary Public-State of Idaho Commission Number 20223246 Notary Signature Commission Expires Jul 7, 2028 My Commission Expires:_07/07/2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2 020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 Legal Description City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer & Water Easement The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 An easement being located in the NW % of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 28, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of the SW '/4 (S '/4 corner) of said Section 28 bears S 89016'58" E a distance of 2635.25 feet; Thence N 1°00'42" E along the west boundary of said SW '/4 of Section 28 a distance of 2630.85 feet to an Aluminum Cap monument marking the northwest corner of the SW% of said Section 4; Thence along the north boundary of said SW%S 89021'17" E a distance of 952.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said boundary N 0038'43" E a distance 24.00 feet to a point; Thence S 89021'17" E a distance of 37.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0°38'43" W a distance of 24.00 feet to a point on the north boundary of said SW '/4; Thence along said boundary N 89°21'17" W a distance of 37.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 888 square feet(0.020 acres)and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Land Solutions, PC \oNPL LA No s January 13, 2023 5 s T F p� 0 1 118 Ant t3�23� o F �oQ, Cb�2 �LTo N W NP- L thon The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Land Surveying and ConsWting City of Meridian Sewer&Water Easement B Job No. 18-35 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER & WATER EASEMENT THE OAKS NORTH SUBDIVISION NO. 12 LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T.41N., R.1W., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO S89'21'17"E NO'38'43"E 37.00' SO'38'43"W 29 28A 24.00' I If 24,00' 1/4 _ _ S89'21'17"E _ _ j _ 2622.24'_ C 0/4 952.55' 37_.00'-7— 1632.69' POINT OF BEGINNING N89'21'17"w 888 SF/0.020 ACRES o �ti w I� R�t� SOgO N17 W oiW OP�SNI > IN �E a W z o z w CD Z W. SNOW CURRANT ST. 29 28 BASIS OF BEARING _ 28 32 33 W. MrMll I N ROAD S89'16'58"E 2635.25' 33 1/4 O�PL LA/y�S 5� ST G� q- G 11118 01 113 I 0 F ON W.HP 0' 40' 80' 160' L lutiff"01nis and Surveying and Consulting 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax Ww landsolutions.biz JOB.RO.18-35 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: The Oaks Subdivision No. 12 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 3 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007764 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 LINDSAY WHEELER 02/08/2023 09:23 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0015 The Oaks Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary ewer and Water Main Easement No. _. c a e THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7t day of FebruapLjo between Tall Southwest LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- ay across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and _water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and ) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, _it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Rya amnions,Division President ATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _1/1H/L3 (date) by Ryan Hammons (name of individual), [complete the following if siggnin in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual behalf-of T011Southwest, LLC �qp "foantity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:Division President of authority such a�type officer or trustee) KYLE PREWE17 µ Notary Public-State of Idaho L' Commission Number 20223246 Notary Signature My Commission Expires Jul 7, 2028 My Commission Expires:07/07/2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.0 1/0 1/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 Legal Description City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer & Water Easements. The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 An easement being located in the W '/z of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 28, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of the SW '/4 (S '/a corner) of said Section 28 bears S 89016'58" E a distance of 2635.25 feet; Thence N 1 000'42" E along the west boundary of said SW '/4 of Section 28 a distance of 2630.85 feet to an Aluminum Cap monument marking the northwest corner of the SW '/4 of said Section 4; Thence along the north boundary of said SW '/4 S 89021'17" E a distance of 1887.15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said boundary N 0°45'26" E a distance 5.88 feet to a point; Thence S 89°14'34" E a distance of 40.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0045'26" W a distance of 24.00 feet; Thence N 89014'34" W a distance of 40.00 feet to a point; Thence N 0°45'26" E a distance of 18.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 960 square feet(0.022 acres)and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Land Solutions, PC \oNp L LA N�s January 13, 2023 STFR Gp G \ 1 11118 l� 9TF OF �LTo N W NPR L n :Autjon The Oaks North Subdivision No. 12 Land surveying and Consulting City of Meridian Sewer&Water Easement C Job No. 18-35 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER & WATER EASEMENT THE OAKS NORTH SUBDIVISION NO. 12 LOCATED IN THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 28, TAN., RAW., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 29 28 NO.45'26"E 5.88' S8914'34"E SO'45'26"W 40.00' / 1/4 _ _ S89'21'17"E _ — 24.00 2622.24' _ C o 4 1887.15' I 735.09' POINT OF BEGINNING 40.00' NO'45'26"E 18.12' N89'14'34"W i O I o 960 SF/0.022 ACRES �2 Np. w N Q 5\0D I _ zCD o o ZN U v Lo z Z 29h33 BASIS OF BEARING _ 28 32 W. McMILLAN ROAD S89'16'58"E 2635.25' 33 1/4 S \p�PL LA/y�s 0 11118 � N�d1I13I23�� = OF ON W. NP 0' 40' 80' 160' Lan �lutions Land Surveying and Consulting 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolulions.biz SOB NO. 18-35 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: outer Banks Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007763 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=22 CHE FOWLER 02/08/2023 09:23 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0013 Outer Banks Subdivision Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this7thyday of February 2023 between 10 Mile Franklin, LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of.-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: 10 MILE FRANKLIN, LLC an Idaho limited liability company FRANKLIN MILE MANAGERS, LLC an Idaho limited liability company, Manager of 10 MILE FRANKLIN, LLC SUNNY COVE, LLC a California limited liability company Manager of FRANKLIN MILE MANAGERS, LLC By. MARK L. ENGSTROM, Manager of SUNNY COVE, LLC SE LOOSE ELK-1 MANAGERS, LLC an Idaho limited liability company, JIMA DD Manager of 10�MILE �FRANKLIN, L \ � z-- By. _ ERIK PILEGAAf ana f ELK-1 MANAGERS, LLC Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of YOLO ) On 11th JANUARY 2023 before me, VICKIE SIO REYES, NOTARY PUBLIC, (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared MARK L ENGSTROM who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. VICKIE S10Kyls o` comm. 62423030 s Nobry 10 o Signature �� Se awn. Od.?3 202i ALL- PURPOSE CERTIFICATE -OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California } County of On _�� � before me, ern i se na a e a — personally appeared 4�e:7r i who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evid ce to be the person(ps whose name(s,yis/o subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sl6/tl ey executed the same in his/hot"rrauthorized capacity(ief, and that by his/lr/tK1r signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons 1 acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. 1TH 01ANA,�Ut] VAZG?13EZ� WITNESS my hand and official seal. h comm..2295530 (� I rAAY PIK C-CMIFQRIiIA T Eap.,Aft 29.2023 Mary Public Signature ( a Pueli ap ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM 71ris jam complies with current California statutes regarding notary wording arid. tf DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT aeeded,should be completed and attached to the document.Acknolvvedgemsfi-ont other states may be completed for documents being sent to that state so long as the wording does not require the California notary to violate Califtimia,rotary law. (Title or description of attached document) • State and County information must be the State and County where the document signer(s)personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s)personally appeared which (Title or description of attached document continued) must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her Number of Pages Document Date commission followed by a comma and then your title(notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER • Indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms(i.e. Wsheldwy;-is/air)or circling the correct forms.Failure to correctly indicate this ❑ Individual (s) information may lead to rejection of document recording. ❑ Corporate Officer • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible. Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges,re-seal if a �It ej� sufficient area permits,otherwise complete a different acknowledgment form. ❑ Partner(s) • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk. ❑ Attorney-in-Fact Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this ❑ Trustee(s) acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. Indicate title or type of attached document,number of pages and date. Other ❑ Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer.If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer,indicate the title(i.e.CEO,CFO,Secretary). 2015 Version wv.w NotaryC lasses.com 800-873-9865 Securely attach this document to the signed document with a staple GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-70-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 DAH O 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 EXHIBIT A Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement Replacing Inst. No.s 2022-045684 & 2022-077595 Boundary Description Project Number 21-574 November 9, 2022 An easement situated in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter-section corner of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; Thence S89*15'23"E, 2640.72 feet along the north line of Section 15 to the northeast corner of Section 15; Thence S09'04'09"W, 386.25 feet on a random line to the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd., the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence S00'13'17"E, 69.26 feet along the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence N89'24'36"W, 181.66 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 33.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 54.00 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 33.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 165.20 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 19.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 94.70 feet; Thence N76'36'21"W, 22.56 feet across the easement to the interior; Thence N89'24'36"W, 527.69 feet; Thence S42'35'40"E, 111.22 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 197.79 feet; Thence N00°35'24"E, 20.90 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 30.00 feet; ANC SG Thence S00°35'24"W, 13.00 feet; G 0 Thence S89'24'36"E, 3.00 feet; CL 1 34 Page 1 of 7 ,r cygEL S . 6y IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence S00'35'24"W, 8.00 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 220.78 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 81.20 feet; Thence S76*36'21"E, 22.56 feet back across the easement to the exterior; Thence S00'35'24"W, 278.46 feet; Thence N09'27'01"W, 126.19 feet across the easement to the interior; Thence N00'35'24"E, 57.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 61.00 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 57.00 feet; Thence S89*24'36"E, 61.00 feet; Thence S09'27'01"E, 126.19 feet back across the easement to the exterior; Thence S89*24'36"E, 293.22 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 22.00 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 21.00 feet; Thence S00*35'24"W, 27.00 feet; Thence S89`24'36"E, 175.05 feet to the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence S08'39'52"W, 40.25 feet along the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence 17.15 feet on a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 7156.00 feet, a central angle of 0*08'14", a chord bearing of S01°55'55"W, and a chord length of 17.15 feet, along the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence on a non-tangent line N89'24'36"W, 166.52 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 20.00 feet; Thence N89*24'36"W, 80.00 feet; Thence N00`35'24"E, 35.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 125.00 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 171.87 feet; A qN0 S Thence S58'58'46"E, 154.25 feet; o 0 Thence S00'35'24"W, 11.93 feet; Cl- 34 r� I I y�i1 , Page 2 of 7 OF �ygEC S . gym I DAH O 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence S89`24'36"E, 20.30 feet; Thence S58`58'46"E, 78.62 feet; Thence 73.82 feet on a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 375.00 feet, a central angle of 11'16'42", a chord bearing of N87`55'06"E, and a chord length of 73.70 feet; Thence S86'26'32"E, 76.53 feet to the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence S03'39'20"W, 38.00 feet along the west right-of-way line of S. Ten Mile Rd.; Thence N86'26'32"W, 76.47 feet; Thence 86.05 feet on a curve to the left, having a radius of 337.00 feet, a central angle of 14'37'46", a chord bearing of S86'14'34"W, and a chord length of 85.81 feet; Thence on a non-tangent line S84'14'53"W, 29.37 feet; Thence N58`58'46"W, 206.42 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 63.79 feet; Thence 553*09'14"E, 118.03 feet; Thence 559'25'10"W, 101.45 feet; Thence N28'21'27"W, 122.16 feet; Thence N58'58'46"W, 261.38 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 220.07 feet; Thence S00`35'24"W, 229.62 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 20.00 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 240.62 feet; Thence N89*24'36"W, 319.33 feet; Thence S00*35'22"W, 236.67 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 20.00 feet; Thence S00'35'22"W, 20.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 20.00 feet; LAND Thence S00'35'22"W, 95.87 feet to the south line of the S F northeast quarter of the northeast quarter; Q 1 4 Page 3 of 7 cygEC S , gym I DAH O 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence N89'15'02"W, 22.00 feet along the south line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter; Thence N00`35'22"E, 372.47 feet; Thence S89`24'36"E, 130.06 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 170.99 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 130.06 feet; Thence N48'18'58"E, 29.73 feet across the easement to the interior; Thence S89'24'36"E, 86.09 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 70.00 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 20.00 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 70.00 feet; Thence S89*24'36"E, 42.86 feet; Thence N45'35'23"E, 73.66 feet; Thence S43`06'45"E, 35.01 feet; Thence S45'35'23"W, 73.23 feet; Thence N89*24'36"W, 45.38 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 165.99 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 89.56 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 30.00 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 20.00 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 30.00 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 81.71 feet; Thence N00`35'24"E, 233.65 feet; Thence N43*06'45"W, 49.22 feet; Thence N46'53'15"E, 23.00 feet; qN Thence S43`06'45"E, 54.10 feet; f Thence S00'35'24"W, 246.01 feet; o 34 Page 4 of 7 �� qT OF DAH O 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence S89'24'36"E, 105.50 feet; Thence N00`35'24"E, 25.00 feet; Thence 589o24'36"E, 20.00 feet; Thence 500'35'24"W, 25.00 feet; Thence 589'24'36"E, 118.80 feet; Thence 558'58'46"E, 252.71 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 277.27 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 98.70 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 128.26 feet; Thence N89o24'36"W, 83.00 feet; Thence N00*35'24"E, 108.00 feet; Thence N89*24'37"W, 156.78 feet; Thence 500'35'24"W, 9.90 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 213.86 feet; Thence N42'35'40"W, 168.83 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 113.76 feet; Thence S45'35'24"W, 28.12 feet; Thence 500'35'22"W, 287.86 feet; Thence S48'18'58"W, 29.73 feet back across the easement to the exterior; Thence N00*35'22"E, 221.22 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 23.00 feet to the east boundary of Baraya Apartments Subdivision (Book 116 of Plats at Pages 17414 through 17416, records of Ada County, Idaho); Thence NW35'22"E, 20.00 feet along the east boundary of Baraya Apartments Subdivision; Thence 589'24'36"E, 23.00 feet; qN� Thence N00035'22"E, 74.33 feet; E SG 0 Thence N45*35'24"E, 21.26 feet; ��Page � �I� � �� � g i F OF cygEL 5 �y� I DAH O 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence N42'09'00"W, 35.03 feet; Thence N45'35'24"E, 32.02 feet; Thence S42'09'00"E, 35.03 feet; Thence N45'35'24"E, 57.04 feet; Thence S43'18'20"E, 19.19 feet; Thence S89'24'36"E, 79.60 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 15.00 feet; Thence S89'24'37"E, 176.00 feet; Thence N65'23'24"E, 37.58 feet across the easement to the interior; Thence S89'24'36"E, 442.60 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 129.46 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 97.00 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 7.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 85.11 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 23.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 167.20 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 21.00 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 93.30 feet; Thence S00'35'24"W, 134.46 feet; Thence S65'23'24"W, 37.58 feet back across the easement to the exterior; Thence N00'35'24"E, 150.46 feet; Thence N89'24'36"W, 35.00 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 24.00 feet; Thence N51'55'49"E, 38.42 feet; Thence N00'35'24"E, 148.26 feet to the south right-of-way AND line of W. Franklin Rd.; S T£ SG Thence S89'15'23"E, 44.00 feet along the south right-of-way �o line of W. Franklin Rd.; C- '0 4 Page 6 of 7 OF cygFL S , gym IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 15G GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement continued... Thence S00°35'24"W, 166.15 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 88.30 feet; Thence N00°35'24"E, 23.00 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 344.31 feet; Thence N00°35'24"E, 133.25 feet to the south right-of-way line of W. Franklin Rd.; Thence S87°59'00"E, 9.25 feet along the south right-of-way line of W. Franklin Rd.; Thence S89°15'23"E, 34.75 feet along the south right-of-way line of W. Franklin Rd.; Thence S00°35'24"W, 153.93 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 28.00 feet; Thence S00°35'24"W, 48.00 feet; Thence N89°24'36"W, 33.00 feet; Thence S00°35'24"W, 134.46 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 165.20 feet; Thence N00°35'24"E, 38.00 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 27.00 feet; Thence S00°35'24"W, 30.00 feet; Thence S89°24'36"E, 158.08 feet; Thence N00°11'38"W, 26.82 feet; Thence N89°49'30"E, 32.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described parcel contains 6.43 acres, more or less. o P34 Page 7 of 7 0�` EXHIBIT B f J fi x E'y q icy r [ +? .. 1/h1�z� Outer Banks Subdivision Revised Utility Easement 11/9/2022 Scale: 1 inch= 170 feet File: Tract 1:6.4336 Acres(280249 Sq.Feet),Closure:n64.2136e 0.03 ft.(1/584670),Perimeter=15678 ft. Basis of Bearings S.10 1/4 _ _ _ N89'15'23"W 2640.72' S.10 S.11 S.15 W. Franklin Rd. S.15 • S.14 I I I O O b l O - - -0 l l O O I 18 � 17 16 15 � 14 7 - - — — — — - - 19 20 I v I \0 - - - - - -6I 13 O8 E I - - - - qC1� — 1121 12 9 D ti � — �bb� J� m - - �¢ d II vi II II Block 1 — — — - - - II II I 10 I o I � bo�� 1 � ate. 1 34 � I I y�• G°' 2 Block 2 'li�Cy F p qSL S. NP:\0u terbonks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Ou ter Banks-Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:29:54 PM Scale: 1"=250' Exhibit _ _ Drawing for Job No. I DAI"IO — 21-574 9955 W.EMERALD ST. Outer Banks Subdivision 0 125 250 5 y 00 SURVEY BOISE,IDAHO83704 Revised Utility Easement Sheet No. (208)846-8570 1 of 9 GROUP, L LC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.M., R.M., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 - - - - - - _ _ _ S.101 S.11 S.15 . S.14 W. Franklin Rd. L143 I L144 . I I I I I I I I I i 04 I� O JI IJ O - I � I 6 L141 I I r 6-L146 I L126 - - - - - IJ J--L127 L125 L124 - _ L128 - - - I I L1 48 i MI I = 16 15 _j I J 14 I I O i I I L152 I YM to9— I L122 '� I`n POB b- - - - - L150 JI b-J- - - - - - - - - --6 N Sheet 7 Sheet 2 P- LA �sG Sheet 6 I Sheet 3 - - - - - - - L - - _ Llp 000 L7 L3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - L9 a 4 L50 Block 1 o I 19T SOP J1 I Sheet 2 is OF Q� N P:\Duterbanks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Outer Sonks_Utilily Easement Comb ined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:21 PM Sheet 3 ygFl S.By Scale: 1"=80' IDAHO Exhibit —__ Drawing for Job No. 0 20 40 80 160 9966E, EMERALD 37 ST 4 Outer Banks Subdivision 21-574 SURVEY BOISE4-8570 704 Revised Utility Easement Sheet No. (208)846-6570 Y 2 of 9 GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date N13N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 b- - - - - L150- - - - - � °- - - - - - - - - - - - -6 J Sheet 7 Sheet 2 — — — Sheet-6 Sheet 3 tie — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — —I— — — 10 ODD L7 L3 Co L11 — � I'- - - - L9- - �I I� � - LS- � Block 1 0I I L15 L16 J I I Sheet 2 IL18 I I 13 Sheet 3 - - — — —L— — I O - — L-L101 L100 L24 I ILO MI I IJ JI I rn L25 I J I I g NI N - - -L98- - -9 ' Block 1 I 21 l 12 O vi I � I OI L 29 22 �I I L27 I� — — — — — — — - - - - -- - — L31 I I M Sheet 6 ISheet 3 � — —L95 — — - L37 — rJ r� - - - - - - - - - - - Sheet 5 Sheet 4 i l J — — — — — J L33 l L35 Npl LAi�O I I s l 10 NSFO G'pG j i CO Sheet 3 4 I I Sheet 4 L 91 l I N a, 'L!j 9TF O F \OP�5 rn l � - - - cygEL S.By� I I NP\Outerbanks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Ou ter Banks—Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:26 PM Scale: 1"=80' IDAHO Exhibit ___ Drawing for Job No. 0 20 40 80 160 130S , EMERALD 704 Outer Banks Subdivision 21-574 SURVEY eOISE,IDAH083704 Revised Utility Easement Sheet No. (201)846.8570 Y 3 Of 9 GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.3N., R.M., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 I I I rN Sheet 6 Sheet 3 —L96 — — L37 — Sheet 5 Sheet 4 i I — �J L33 I I L35 I I E 10 I 100 IJ Sheet 3 ' Sheet 4 I I I I I I JI � I \ N, �<99 I \ `39 11 \ \ ` L40 L4100 � I C2- - -o— _ L43 _ I \ `"A9 -j I \ \ L46 C3 L45 \ � I I \ / C) O I i 1�3 4 0 ,�o� , / N� IIl7lz�° ob°� / I G Block 2 I + / O I ctigEL S.gyp / " I NP:\Oaterbonks 21-574\dw9\21-574_0uter Banks—Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:31 PM Scale: 1"=80' Exhibit _ Drawing for Job No. IDAHO Outer Banks Subdivision 21-574 9955 W.EMERALD ST. Sheet NO. 0 20 40 80 1so SURVEY (208)8 IDAHO6-8570 3704 Revised Utility Easement 4 of 9 (208)846-6570 GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.3N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 I I ! I Sheet 6 1 1 I 00 Sheet 6 Sheet 3 Sheet 5 I I �i �- \ Sheet 5 Sheet 4 I I JI I (0 100 �I IJ I I I I l f I I I I L81 I I L91 I I O? ?N I -i—d Ij— — — — — b — — — — - - o L65— - - L79 L83 L89 ) L93 — — — — — — — — - I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I � L53 -0` I Block 1 �C91 � I ! 100 U) Iu) `_°I I I ! I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I k5?0 0 J `sG L55 I L61 I I O I N 1 34 � I cP� 0 OF I AEA S.0 L63 NP:\Outerbanks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Ou ter Banks—Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:36 PM Scale: 1"=80' IDAHO Exhibit ——— Drawing for Job No. 21-574 9955 W.EMERALD ST. Outer Banks Subdivision Sheet 4 o. 0 20 40 80 160 SURVEY BOISE4-8570 704 Revised Utilit Easement (208)846-8570 Y 5 of 9 GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.31N., R.1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 I 1� N M 18 �� IJ 17 16 She\t7 1 Sheet 6 I E L118 1 I I -10 - - - - - - L119 1 \,1`L1� - - - - - - - - - - - - -L122 - - - - - - - - - - b' - - - - �' tie Sheet 7 Sheet 2 L112 �''�� � Sheet 6 Sheet 3 re L104 I Block 1 01 L110 I /O\ L15 L16 f \\ b- - - - - - - - - - - - - --7K L - - L- - I J — — — 1 — — — — — — \ — — — — — — — — — — — L108 -L!1'0 c19 ti /\ L 24 L102 J0 J rn. L26 ) 6IA L98 R 01 IN �J 34 ' Cm L69 L73 (P \rObA- - - - - -- 0L67 EL S.6 L77 -m°III1 IIII ! - 1I J T�- 13 Sheet 6 1— Sheet 61Sheet 3IIE Sheet 5 Sheet 5 Sheet 4�1 I J1 N P.\Outerbanks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Outer Banks Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:29:59 PM Scale: 1"=80' IDAHO Exhibit ___ Drawing for Job No. 0 20 40 80 160 BOSS BOISE, EMERALD ST. Outer Banks Subdivision 21-574 SURVEY (208)8 IDAHO&8570 3704 Revised Utility Easement Sheet No. czoBiB4B-B57o Y 6 of 9 GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date m --u T.3N., R.M., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 W. Franklin Rd. L137 I ! I f 0 ! I rI I00 I� 1 4 � JI J tn� f( I I 0 G) c'ygE L S.�y� I L141 L140 - - - - - - - - - - —L139 — J�L1331 L130 L126 - I I L129 — — — — — _ _ — — — — �--L127 L125 I I L128 I I I I� Sh \t7 Sheet 6 I L118 I I I O — — — — — L119 I �121� — — — — — — — — — — — — —L122 — — — — — — — — — — — — — \. — — — — —L120 — I. `� `d � - - - - �'' (�e Sheet 71Sheet 2 L112 � _ Sheet 6 I Sheet 3 tie L104 \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �L10 � L11 NI P:\Ou erbanks 21`574\dwg\21-574_Outer Banks—Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:46 PM Scale: 1"-80' IDAHO Exhibit --_ Drawing for Job No. 0 20 40 $0 160 99ss E, EMERALD 37 ST. Outer Banks Subdivision 21-574 SURVEY B018)84-8570 IDAHO 704 Revised Utility Easement 7eet ofNo. 9 (zoe>eas-es7o GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date NT.3N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 Line Table Line Table Line Table Line Table Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length L1 S09'04'09"W 386.25' L21 S00'35'24"W 278.46' L41 S89'24'36"E 20.30' L61 N89'24'36"W 20.00' L2 S0013'17"E 69.26' L22 N09'27'01"W 126.19' L42 S58'58'46"E 78.62' L62 S00'35'22"W 95.87' L3 N89'24'36"W 181.66' L23 N00'35'24"E 57.00' L43 S86'26'32"E 76.53' L63 N89'15'02"W 22.00' L4 S00'35'24"W 33.00' L24 N89'24'36"W 61.00' L44 S03'39'20"W 38.00' L64 N00'35'22"E 372.47' L5 N89'24'36"W 54.00' L25 S00'35'24"W 57.00' L45 N86'26'32"W 76.47' L65 S89'24'36"E 130.06' L6 N00'35'24"E 33.00' L26 S89'24'36"E 61.00' L46 S84'14'53"W 29.37' L66 N00'35'24"E 170.99' L7 N89'24'36"W 165.20' L27 S89'24'36"E 293.22' L47 N58'58'46"W 206.42' L67 N89'24'36"W 130.06' L8 S00'35'24"W 19.00' L28 N00'35'24"E 22.00' L48 S00'35'24"W 63.79' L68 N48'18'58"E 29.73' L9 N89'24'36"W 94.70' L29 S89'24'36"E 21.00' L49 S53'09'14"E 118.03' L69 S89'24'36"E 86.09' L10 N76'36'21"W 22.56' L30 S00'35'24"W 27.00' L50 S59'25'10"W 101.45' L70 N00'35'24"E 70.00' L11 N89'24'36"W 527.69' L31 S89'24'36"E 175.05' L51 N28'21'27"W 122.16' L71 S89'24'36"E 20.00' L12 S42'35'40"E 111.22' L32 S08'39'52"W 40.25' L52 N58'58'46"W 261.38' L72 S00'35'24"W 70.00' L13 S89'24'36"E 197.79' L33 N89'24'36"W 166.52' L53 N89'24'36"W 220.07' L73 S89'24'36"E 42.86' L14 N00'35'24"E 20.90' L34 S00'35'24"W 20.00' L54 S00'35'24"W 229.62' L74 N45'35'23"E 73.66' L15 S89'24'36"E 30.00' L35 N89'24'36"W 80.00' L55 N89'24'36"W 20.00' L75 S43'06'45"E 35.01' L16 S00'35'24"W 13.00' L36 N0035'24"E 35.00' L56 N00'35'24"E 240.62' L76 S45'35'23"W 73.23' L17 S89'24'36"E 3.00' L37 N89'24'36"W 125.00' L57 N89'24'36"W 319.33' L77 N89'24'36"W 45.38, L18 S00'35'24"W 8.00' L38 S00'35'24"W 171.87' L58 S00'35'22"W 236.67' L78 S0035'24"W 165.99' L19 S89'24'36"E 220.78' L39 S58'58'46"E 154.25' L59 S89'24'36"E 20.00' L79 S89'24'36"E 89.56' L20 N00'35'24"E 81.20' L40 S00'35'24"W 11.93' L60 S00'35'22"W 20.00' L80 N00'35'24"E 30.00' A SG � O l o < d 34 X P:\Outerbanks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Ou ter Banks-Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:51 PM Exhibit _ _ Drawing for Job No. IDAHO - g 21-574 9955 W.EMERALD ST. Outer Banks Subdivision Sheet No. OF �� �� SURVEY (208)8 IDAHO&8570 3704 Revised Utility Easement czoai Bas-as7o Y 8 Of 9 9EL S.- GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.M., R.M., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 Line Table Line Table Line Table Line Table Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length Line Bearing Length L81 S89'24'36"E 20.00' L101 S00'35'24"W 9.90' L121 N65'23'24"E 37.58' L139 S89'24'36"E 88.30' L82 S00'35'24"W 30.00' L102 N89'24'36"W 213.86' L122 S89'24'36"E 442.60' L140 N00'35'24"E 23.00' L83 S89'24'36"E 81.71' L103 N42'35'40"W 168.83' L123 N00'35'24"E 129.46' L141 S89'24'36"E 344.31' L84 N00'35'24"E 233.65' L104 N89'24'36"W 113.76' L124 N89'24'36"W 97.00' L142 N00'35'24"E 133.25' L85 N43'06'45"W 49.22' L105 S4535'24"W 28.12' L125 N00'35'24"E 7.00' L143 S87'59'00"E 9.25' L86 N46'53'15"E 23.00' L106 S00'35'22"W 287.86' L126 N89'24'36"W 85.11' L144 S89'15'23"E 34.75' L87 S43'06'45"E 54.10' L107 N00'35'22"E 221.22' L127 S00'35'24"W 23.00' L145 S0035'24"W 153.93' L88 S00'35'24"W 246.01' L108 N89'24'36"W 23.00' L128 N89'24'36"W 167.20' L146 S89'24'36"E 28.00' L89 S89'24'36"E 105.50' L109 N00'35'22"E 20.00' L129 N00'35'24"E 21.00' L147 S00'35'24"W 48.00' L90 N00'35'24"E 25.00' L110 S89'24'36"E 23.00' L130 N89'24'36"W 93.30' L148 N89'24'36"W 33.00' L91 S89'24'36"E 20.00' 1-111 N00'35'22"E 74.33' L131 S00'35'24"W 134.46' L149 S0035'24"W 134.46' L92 S00'35'24"W 25.00' L112 N45'35'24"E 21.26' L132 N00'35'24"E 150.46' L150 S89'24'36"E 165.20' L93 S89'24'36"E 118.80' L113 N42'09'00"W 35.03' L133 N89'24'36"W 35.00' L151 N0035'24"E 38.00' L94 S58'58'46"E 252.71' L114 N45'35'24"E 32.02' L134 N00'35'24"E 24.00' L152 S89'24'36"E 27.00' L95 N00'35'24"E 277.27' L115 S42'09'00"E 35.03' L135 N51'55'49"E 38.42' L153 S00'35'24"W 30.00' L96 N89'24'36"W 98.70' L116 N45'35'24"E 57.04' L136 N00'35'24"E 148.26' L154 S89'24'36"E 158.08' L97 N00'35'24"E 128.26' L117 S43'18'20"E 19.19' L137 S89'15'23"E 44.00' L155 N00'11'38"W 26.82' L98 N89'24'36"W 83.00' L118 S89'24'36"E 79.60' L138 S00'35'24"W 166.15' L156 N89'49'30"E 32.97' L99 N00'35'24"E 108.00' L119 S00'35'24"W 15.00' Curve Table L100 N89'24'37"W 156.78' L120 S89'24'37"E 176.00' Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 17.15' 7156.00' 0*08'14" S01'55'55"W 17.15' A D C2 73.82' 375.00' 11*16'42" N87'55'06"E 73.70' S p SG C3 86.05' 337.00' 14'37'46" S86'14'34"W 85.81' C) _l A P:\Outerbonks 21-574\dwg\21-574_Ou ter Banks-Utility Easement Combined.dwg 11/9/2022 2:16:56 PM N� I/ 3 4 IDAHO Exhibit ___ Drawing for Job No. 21-574 '9� Q 9955 W.EMERALD ST. Outer Banks Subdivision Sheet 4 o. OF �� �`' SURVEY (08)846-857083704 Revised Utility Easement 9 of 9 cygEL S-1b GROUP, LLC Situated in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 15, Dwg. Date T.3N., R.M., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 11/9/2022 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: outer Banks Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007831 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=11 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 11:47 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0271 Outer Banks Subdivision PEDESTRIAN AT A ° EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 7th day of February ,2023 between 1 Mile Franklin, L,LC, are Idaho limited liability company hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation whose address is 33 E, Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642,hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; I a ESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the patsy improvements upon the easement described herein and be responsible for the ongoing repair and maintenance of said pathway improvements; and NOW, THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: GRANTOR does hereby grant unto Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees,brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein, IT IS EXPRESSLY Y DEI2STOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-01 t 5-0530,v. 1.1 GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. GRANTOR does hereby covenant with Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. The parties agree that the pathway and the easement identified herein is provided for "recreational purposes," as defined in Idaho Code Section 36-1604 and is therefore subject to the limitations on liability set forth therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. [end of text—signatures on following page] Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v. 1.1 GRANTOR: 10 MILE FRANKLIN, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company By: Franklin Mile Managers, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company Its: Manager By: Sunny Cove LLC, an Idaho limited liability company Its: Manager By: Mark Engstrom, Manager STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _ _ (date), by Mark Engstrom as Manager of Sunny Cove LLC, the Idaho limited liability company that is the Manager of Franklin Mile Managers, LLC, the Idaho limited liability company that is the Manager of 10 Mile Franklin, LLC. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Commission Expires: Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v. 1.1 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) } ss. County of �o ko ) On b PC e hn b e v S 2.0 Z Z _ before me, Notary Public personally appeared_P1 Gt V �4 Ael stir 0VVI who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. r � SIGNATURE w. CA7Ny M SNELTON COAMM.#2398715 Pl16LIC•CALIFORMA rl7 ` COM11 Kp jRE3�pRNTY n 23,2026 CA-Notary Acknowledgment—One Page GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert Simison, Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk 2-7-2023 Approved By City Council On: 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this 7th day of February, 2023 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v.1.1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Easement Property • IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Bolse,ID 83704 SG GROUP Phone:(208)846-8570 Fax: (205)884-53" Outer Banks Subdivision Pathway Easement Boundary Description Project Number 21-574 November 9,2022 A 12-foot wide easement situated In the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range i West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and being 6.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline; Commencing at the northeast comer of Section 25,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian; Thence N89'15'23'W,2320.37 feet along the north line of Section 15 to the northwest comer of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15; Theme SOO°35'22"W,73.12 feet along the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter to the south right-of-way line of W.Franklin Rd.; Thence S89'15'23"E,6.15 feet along the south right-of-way line of W.Franklin Rd.to the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence 501'00'00'W,8.17 feet; Thence 23.40 feet on a curve to the left,having a radius of 16.00 feet,a central angle of 48'00'00",a chord bearing of S23'00'00"E,and a chord length of 13.02 feet; Thence 51.02 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 79.00 feet,a central angle of 37'00'00",a chord bearing of S28"30'00"E,and a chord length of 50.13 feet; Thence 20.26 feet on a compound curve to the right,having a radius of 129.00 feet,a central angle of 09'00'00",a chord bearing of SOS'30W'E,and a chord length of 20.24 feet; Thence 30.89 feet on a compound curve to the right,having a radius of 118.00 feet,a central angle of 15'00'00",a chord bearing of S06'30'00'W,and a chord length of 30.90 feet; Thence 61.03 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 269.00 feet,a central angle of 13'00'00",a chord bearing of S07'30'00"W,and a chord length of 60.90 feet; Thence 20.21 feet on a compound curve to the left,having a radius of 193,00 feet,a central angle of 06'00'00",a chord bearing of 502'00'00"E,and a chord length of 20.20 feet; Thence 37.93 feet on a compound curve to the left,having a radius of 41.00 feet,a central angle of 53'00'00",a chord bearing of S31'30'00"E,and a chord length of 36.59 feet; Thence 40.79 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a L LAN radius of 57.00 feet,a central angle of 41'00'00',a chord - bearing of$37'30100"E,and a chord length of 39.92 feet; 4 34 Page 1 of 3 r�afl Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v. 1.1 • IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise,ID 83704 GROUP Phone:(208)846.8570 Fax: (208)884-53" Outer Banks Subdivision Pathway Easement continued... Thence 102.97 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 100.00 feet,a central angle of S9'00'00",a chord bearing of S46'30'00"E,and a chord length of 98.49 feet; Thence 26.53 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 20.00 feet,a central angle of 76'00'00",a chord bearing of S38'00'00"E,and a chord length of 24.63 feet; Thence SDO'00'00"E,53.00 feet; Thence 69.98 feet on a curve to the left,having a radius of 77.00 feet,a central angle of 52'00'00",a chord bearing of S26'00'00"E,and a chord length of 67.51 feet; Thence 85.45 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 288.00 feet,a central angle of 17'00'00",a chord bearing of S43'30'00"E,and a chord length of 85.14 feet; Thence 31.52 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 42.00 feet,a central angle of 43'00'00",a chord bearing of S56'30'00"E,and a chord length of 30.79 feet; Thence 30.37 feet on a compound curve to the Left,having a radius of 174.00 feet,a central angle of 10'00'00",a chord bearing of S83'00'00"E,and a chord length of 30.33 feet; Thence 24.92 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 84.00 feet,a central angle of 17'00'00",a chord bearing of S79'30'00"E,and a chord length of 24.83 feet; Thence 37.87 feet on a compound curve to the right,having a radius of 35.00 feet,a central angle of 62'00'00",a chord bearing of S40'00'00"E,and a chord length of 36.05 feet; Thence 54.79 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 43.D0 feet,a central angle of 73'00'00",a chord bearing of 545'30'00'E,and a chord length of 52.15 feet; Thence 134.39 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 110.00 feet,a central angle of 70'00'00",a chord bearing of S47'00'00"E,and a chord length of 126.29 feet; Thence 108.28 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 241.00 feet,a central angle of 44'00'00",a chord bearing of S34'WW'E,and a chord length of 105.64 feet; Theme S56'WW'E,16.00 feet; Theme 60.81 feet on a curve to the left,having a radius of 268.00 feet,a central angle of 13'00'00",a chord bearing of S62'30'00'E,and a chord length of 60.68 feet; Thence 81.16 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 186.00 feet,a central angle of 25'00'00",a chord bearing of S56'30'00"E,and a chord length of 80.52 feet; Thence 33.41 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius L of 59.00 feet,a central angle of 33'00'W',a chord bearing of S60'3VW'E,and a chord length of 32.9S feet; 4 1 �r334 Page 2 nf 3 ryQ�L S. Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v. 1.1 • IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise,ID $3704 GROUP Phone: (208)846-8570 Fax: (208)884-5399 Outer Books Subdivision Pathway Easement continued... Thence 19.57 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 59.00 feet,a central angle of 19'00'00",a chord bearing of S67'3000"E,and a chord length of 19.48 feet; Thence S58'00'00"E,37.00 feet, Thence 6.96 feet on a curve to the right,having a radius of 19.00 feet,a central angle of 21'00'00",a chord bearing of S47'30'00"E,and a chord length of 6.92 feet; Thence 56.06 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 73.00 feet,a central angle of 44'00'00",a chord bearing of 559'00'00"E,and a chord length of 54.69 feet; Thence 35.81 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 19.00 feet,a central angle of 108'00'00",a chord bearing of S27'00'00"E,and a chord length of 30.74 feet; Thence 37.52 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 25.00 feet,a central angle of 86'00'00",a chord bearing of S16'00'00"E,and a chord length of 34.10 feet; Thence S59'00'00"E,75.00 feet; Thence 35.19 feet on a curve to the left,having a radius of 48.00 feet,a central angle of 42'00'00",a chord bearing of S80'00'00"E,and a chord length of 34.40 feet; Thence 68.64 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 69.00 feet,a central angle of 57'00'00",a chord bearing of S72'30'00"E,and a chord length of 65.85 feet; Thence 23.95 feet on a reverse curve to the left,having a radius of 49.00 feet,a central angle of 28'00'00",a chord bearing of S58'00'00"E,and a chord length of 23.71 feet; Thence 14.66 feet on a reverse curve to the right,having a radius of 20.00 feet,a central angle of 42'00'00 a chord bearing of S51'1000"E,and a chord length of 14.33 feet to the POINT OF ENDING. The above-described easement contains 0.45 acres,more or less. The sidelines of the above-described shall extend or contract to form a closed figure and to dose upon the property lines at the POINT OF BEGINNING and at the POINT OF ENDING. L p .SG CL 1 4 sf i! Page 3 of 3i ryQEt S Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4892-0115-0530,v. 1.1 OD C� b Basis of Bearings N8915'23"W 2640.72' `n� Point of w� S.10 1/4 E1/16 S.15 Beginning W. Franklin Rd. S.10 S.11 5.15 1320.35' 11320 3T _ S.15 S.14 �`J O O O4 O ; a I ♦ 18 17 I 16 15 14 O ♦ � v C7 ♦ I I ,CD ♦♦ 19 120 13 Ii8 c O ��q♦♦ Block 1 °- 0 oa ♦ \ 21 12 Og vi m °�♦ © CD bd CD Block 1 b Q CD Point o L `� Ending �yt � obo 1 1334 '�'G 2 ock 2 '".,`!lte yi �-"'of c�AEL S. Scale: 1'-250' IDAHO Exhibit Drawing for �4 aa1W..fNEWans1_ Outer Banks SubdivMon d 125 zsa soo SURVEY 00*M Pathway Easement 1 ofN3 GROUP, LLC Sftatad in Um W/4 of We WI/4 of Saotfon 15. Do% Dat. — _ T-WL.RAW.B.M..City of MoldkN% Ada Comt%Maps 11/ti/dlTt 00 b Co E1/16 S.15 �C15 Cre 1.5 60 Nw Point of `\\� C17 Np L2 Beginning ` \ -'� '• cre a L3 � C1 .`_AC2 \\ 4 34 C3 \ 1 �i1 F Qp ' IF \ ^C19 I C5 \ •\ LS C6 C7 --C21 \\` C22C23 Le \ G ' - , C24 \\ ;� C9Ir- \\C0oy� C2S C27•\ ��L� \ aY \ INC�• L7 \ \ '-- C26• C29 \V! CIV \C`31 \C1, Point ofx\ jC �,(���c1s cre � E v ndl� Score: t"=100' Exhibit Drawing for Job N& IDAHO M R Outer Banks Subdivision 2'-3" 0 25 50 100 200 SURVEY ;., + Pathway Easement 2 pf 3 GROUP, LLC SIUMed An We MEt/s of Vw K1/4.f s.cua, is. �Date T.M..R.M.&M., at_y_of MwMan, Ado Cotmky6 aAa_ ttA/an A b CD �a N� O Gn 3. Curve Table Curve Table cn w d Curve Length Rodlus Delta Chord Seortng Chord Length Curve Length Rodlus Delta Chord Beortng Chord Length C1 13.40' 16.00' 48'00'00" S23' OO'E 13.02' C21 51.16' 188W 251D0'00' S5610'00'E 80.52' cC2 51.02' 79.00' 37'00'00" S2B'30'00"E 50.13' C22 33.41' 55.00' 33*00'00" S60'30'00'E 32.95' Cry C3 20.26' 129.00' 9'OD'00' N0530'OD"W 20.24' C23 19.57' 59.00' 19'00'00" S6710'001E 19.48' y m C4 30.89' 11&00' 15'00'O0" SO6'30'00"W Maw C24 6.96' 19.00' 21'00'00" S47'30'00'E 6.92' C5 61.DS 269.00' 13'00'OD" S07'36'00"W 60.90' C25 56.06' 73.00' 44100'00' S59'0V00'E 54.69' CO 20.21' 193.00 6100'DO' S02'00'00'E 20.20' C26 35.81' 19.00' 108'0700' N2T00'00'W 30.74' C7 37.93' 41,00' 53'00'00" S31'30'OO'E 36.59' C27 37.52' 25.00' 86100'00' S161D0'00'E 34.10' CS 40.79' 57.00' 41'00'00' S37'3WOO"E 39.92' C28 36.19' 48.00' 42'DO'00' S80'DO'00'E 34.40' C9 102.97 100.00' 59'00'00" S46'30'00"E 9&48' C29 6&64' 69.00' 57w oo' S72'30'00'E 65.85' CIO 26.53' 20.00' 76'00'00" S38'OWWE 24.63' C30 2195' 49.00' 281D0'00' S58'00'00"E 23.71' C11 69.68' 77.00' 52'00'00' S26'OO'00'E 67.51' C31 14.66' 20.00' 42'00'00' S51'00'00'E 14.33' C12 85.45' 28&00 17'00'OO' S43'30'00'E 8&14' C13 31.52' 42.00' 43'00'00' S56'30'00'E 30.79' Line Table C14 30.37' 174.00' 10-00`00' S83'00'00'E 30.33' Line Bearing Length C15 24.92' 84.00' 17'00'00' N79'30'00'W 24.83' L1 NOO'35'22'E 73.12' C16 37.87' 35.00' 62'00'00' N4O'00'00'W 35.05' L2 S891513"E 8.15 C17 54.79' 43.00' 73'00'00' S45'3WOO"E 51.15' L3 SOIWOO'W 8.17' C18 134.39' 110.00' 70'00'00' S471OD'00'E 126.19' L4 SOO'00'CO'W 53.00' C19 108.2W 141.00' 44'DO'00" S34'OD'00"E 105.64' L5 N56MVOO'W 16.00' C20 60.51' 268.00' 13'00'00' 562-30.00-E 60.56' L6 SSWOW00'E 37.00' L7 SSSW'OCrE 75.00' L � v fJ~ J3`'F ►: iwtm42e-!rs u.�r"n[.....tr W 2-2140ti o.. 40 ttJ�/Zt�0 IDAHO utterExhlb _ Drawing for 211-5Jub 74 900W. weaoer, Outer Banks Subdivision sn«r Nn fl+j7T$OF 1� % SURVEY '°'°' Pathway Easement 3 of 3 cyget S.B� GROUP LLC Shpatml In "NV/4 of the W/4 a1 Seam 15. orgy, Date , er_ T T.3K.R.M.O.M.^Ch of Mklan. Ada Count Ideuo. lIAlAn E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007827 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 11:46 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0264 Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Essentent Number: SANITARY SE WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 2023 between DRB Investments, LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.0 1/0 1/2020 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007828 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 11:46 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0264 Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Essentent Number: SANITARY SE WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 2023 between DRB Investments, LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.0 1/0 1/2020 ESMT-2022-0264 Pine 43, Fairview Commercial Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: SANITARY SEWER AND}WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 7th day of February 2023 between DRB Investments, LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: )&AX-6;e5e— 6F LL STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This rec rd was, acknowledged before me on /� 5;V,72 (date) by W. 84-� name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of�AP�/ 73,LIZ (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:_&&f—)A4e3,0-- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) N�1�1�IG�If��ry :Z r W C�SM22 5: = Notary Signature Xi'1pf , My Commission Expires:_/i? 'ZZ/Ns. Sanitary Sewer and AitiN1t5t1 asernent REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2-7-2023 Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 i III Olt Op INC. J-U•9[N°INC[YB.INC. J-8 FAMILY OF COMPANIES EXHIBIT"A" DRB INVESTMENTS,LLC CITY OF MERIDIAN 30-FOOT-WIDE SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an Aluminum cap marking the north quarter corner of said Section 8,from which a Brass cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 8 bears North 89°59'19"West,2,652.60 feet; Thence along a random line, South 41°55'08"West,292.76 feet to the easterly boundary of Parcel 2,as shown in that certain Record of Survey No. 11291, recorded under Instrument No. 2018-024368, Records of Ada County,said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement to be described; Thence N 89°33'01"W, 140.39 feet; Thence N 00°26'59" E, 5.50 feet; Thence N 89°33'01"W, 10.00 feet; Thence S 00°26'59"W,5.50 feet; Thence N 89°33'01" W, 105.69 feet; Thence N 00°26'59" E, 7.40 feet; Thence N 89°33'01"W, 15.00 feet; Thence S 00°26'59"W, 7.40 feet; Thence N 89°33'01" W, 187.04 feet; Thence N 00°26'59" E, 5.00 feet; Thence N 89°33'01" W, 10.00 feet; Thence S 00"26'59"W,5.00 feet; Thence N 89°33'01"W, 52.52 feet; Thence S 60°37'15"W, 64.71 feet; Thence S 43°25'41" E,30.93 feet; Thence N 60°37'15" E,49.21 feet; Thence S 89°33'01" E, 179.52 feet; Thence S 00°26'59"W, 11.50 feet; Thence S 89°33'01" E, 10.00 feet; Thence N 00°26'59" E, 11.50 feet; Thence S 89"33'01" E, 193.75 feet; Thence S 00°26'59"W, 11.50 feet; Thence S 89'33'01" E, 10.00 feet; Thence N 00°26'59" E, 11.50 feet; Thence S 89°33'01" E, 119.34 feet; Thence N 00°30'23" E, 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 17,653.62 square feet or 0.41 acres of land, more or less. Page 1 of 2 2760 West Excursion Lane,Suite 400,Meridian,ID 83642-5313 rr www.iub.com P 208.376.7330 �' " I d1 WI! N I XN�"110 J411•11 KNOINIVEM INC. J-U B FAMILY OF COMPANIES This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J.Shea, PLS,all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. LAND Jo n J. , PLS 15528 ��,`���t ST'r SG .c 0 12-06-ZOZ2Z Date v� lF 0 N C' /z_ob��gfi Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "B" 6 5 BASIS OF BEARING 5 N89`59'19"W 2652.60' t a r E. FAIRVIEW AVE. r E 8 2 p OR. OF PARCEL 2ROS 11291 o soo �� (SEE BELOW) POINT OF BEGINNING SCALE tNFEET E. WILSON ST. cis a L w, POINT OF— N u2 L11 L7 Ls L4 L3 BEGINNING r L1 -- � L10 L9 L8 L5 L1 0---- `^ -----------------------� ------- L2-------- - �:� 30' WIDE SEWER AND WATER EASE MENT � Les ----------------------- ----------------------- ---- -I L17 L21 -� L25 L18 L20 L22 � L24 \�! L19 L23 EAST LINE OF PARCEL 2, \�y ROS 11291 E 4j 0 LINE TABLE LINE TABLE 3 d NO. BEARING DIST. NO. BEARING DIST 0 L1 N89'33'01"W 140.39' L15 S43'25'41"E 30.93' o I L2 N00'26'59"E 5.50' L16 N60'37'15"E 49.21' N L3 N89'33'01"W 10.00' L17 S89'33'01"E 179.52' 04 L4 S00'26'59"W 5.50' L18 S00'26'59"W 11.50' N .o L5 N89'33'01"W 105.69' L19 S89.33-01"E 10.00' 0 80 L6 N00'26'59"E 7.40' L20 NOO'26'59"E 11.50' C W o SCALE IN FEET L7 N89'33'01"W 15.00' L21 S89'33'01"E 193,75' L8 S00'26'59V 7.40' L22 S00'26'59"W 11.50' sTallo s� L9 N89'33'01"W 187.04' L23 S89'33'01"E 10.00' y L10 N00'26'59"E 5.00' L24 N00'26'59"E 11.50' C Mo L1 1 N89.33'01"W 10.00' L25 S89'33'01"E 1 19.34' L12 S00'26'59"W 5.00' L26 N00'30'23"E 30.00' TF OF \� o yN S\\ t- L13 N89'33'01"W 52.52' L27 S41'55'08"W 292.76' L14 S60'37'15"W 64.71' i CITY OF MERIDIAN _SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ SHEET z � SITUATE IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 8, T3N, R1 E, 1 OF 1 )-U-8 ENGINEERS,INC. BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Settler's Crossing Partial Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007759 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 ANGIE STEELE 02/08/2023 09:19 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0258 Settler's Crossing PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING PARTIALLY RELEASED: Water/Sanitary Sewer Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTORS: Settlers Crossing, LLC , INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated December 11th , 2006 and recorded as Instrument Number 107008142 in the land records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("the Easement"),upon the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS,the continuance of a certain portion of the Easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the City of Meridian does hereby release, vacate, and abandon that certain portion of the Easement on the lands more particularly described on Exhibit A, and depicted on Exhibit B,attached hereto and incorporated herein. All rights and privileges under the under the above-described document in and to the remaining lands covered by the Easement shall remain and continue in the Grantee and shall not be affected in any way hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 7th day of February 20 23 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simi ay 2°'-r> 023 CMNA'�ID zANX­ qFAT Attest by C Johnson,` ityrl 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Na&ycWajj Notary Signature CHARLENE WAY My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC Version 0l/O1/2020 STATE OF IDAHO EXHIBIT A (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED) T-O ENGINEERS November 3, 2022 Project No.: 220506 EXHIBIT "A" EASEMENT RELEASE An easement located in Lot 51, Block 7 of Sundance Subdivision No. 5, as filed in Book 98, Page 12523-12526 of Plats, in Government Lot 4 of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said Lot 51, Block 7, from which the northeast corner of said Lot 51, bears S.00°00'00"W., 145.31 feet; thence, along the south line of said Lot 51, A) N.90000'01"W., 8.96 feet; thence, leaving said south line, B) N.00000'01"W., 23.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, 1) N.90000'00"W., 33.94 feet; thence, 2) N.48025'18"E., 11.74 feet; thence, 3) N.00000'01"W., 69.62 feet; thence, 4) S.89034'42"E., 25.16 feet; thence, 5) S.00000'01"E., 77.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 1,979 square feet, more or less. NA` LAND SG �45 \,fir E N SF0 a 11/04/2022 0 1782 9y�F OF �OP�Off' �R6 W 0 Q 1 2471 S.Titanium Place I Meridian, ID 83642 1 P: 208.323.2288 1 to-engineers.com EXHIBIT B (MAP DEPICTING THE PORTION OF THE EASEMENT BEING RELEASED) ©2022 T-0 ENGINEERS.THIS INSTRUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF T-0 ENGINEERS.ANY REPRODUCTION,REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF T-0 ENGINEERS ISSTRICTLY PROHIBITED. EXHIBIT SKETCH-EASEMENT RELEASE 1/4 LOCATED IN LOT 51, BLOCK 7 OF SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION NO. 5,AS FILED IN BOOK 98, PAGE 36T31 12523-12526 OF PLATS, IN GOVERNMENT LOT 4 SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2022 I NE CORNER LOT 51 S89'34'42"E 25.16' EASEMENT RELEASE oo 1,979 SQ. FT. 00 L6 o 0 LOT 52 \�NPI L A/yp S N00'00'01"VV� N��`��' �\CESfp GAF LOT 50 69.62' 11/04/2022 �o S00'00 01"E a 0 wS LOT 51 �77.22' 1782�� N48'25'18"E 9,L 9rE OF \OQ�Q� o 11.74' P ,! POB OR Q z L fW M co N90'00'00"W CORNER 33.94' LOT 51 N00.00'01"W 0 < // 23.00' f� N90'00'00"W 7 0' 20' 40' 80, LOT 55 8.96' 0 i I LOT 54 ~ t- 220506•V-EASEMENT EXHI&TAn 1112022 220%6 ^C a I O °�°� T-O ENGINEERS O 10 2471 S.TITANIUM PLACE 36 31 S89'34'40"E 2406.44' — 1//44 31 MERIDIAN,IDAHO 83642 1 6 - 256.51' 2149.93 6 208-323-2288 I WWW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Victory Commons Full Release of Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-007761 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 HEATHER LUTHER 02/08/2023 09:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0001 Victory Commons FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: Kuna Victorv, LLC INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated April 22 , 2009 and recorded as Instrument Number 109045638 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS,the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish,release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 7th day of February ,20 23 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simi—son,Ma or 2-7-2023 (' �SFAI ft4ltIA,, \ Attest by Pris Joh ' ` °ty Clerk 2-7-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 2-7-2023 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Na&wWatt Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-202$ CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Modern Craftsman at Black Cat (H- 2022-0083) by Brandon Sheltrown, HB Architects, located at 4701 W. Caragana Ln. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N,, AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Modern Craftsman MDA,by Baron Black Cat,LLC. Case No(s). H-2022-0083 For the City Council Hearing Date of. January 17,2023 (Findings on February 7,2023) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17,2023, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17, 2023,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17, 2023, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17, 2023, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17,2023,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MODERN CRAFTSMAN AT BLACK CAT MDA-FILE H-2022-0083) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Modification to the Development Agreement is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17,2023, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 17,2023 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MODERN CRAFTSMAN AT BLACK CAT MDA-FILE H-2022-0083) -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 7th day of February 2023. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 2-7-2023 Attest: Chris Johnson 2-7-2023 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 2-7-2023 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MODERN CRAFTSMAN AT BLACK CAT MDA-FILE H-2022-0083) -3- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 1/17/2023 Legend RUTS DATE: R' 0 ElProject Location TO: Mayor&City Council R-4 RUT FROM: Stacy Hersh,Associate Planner R-8 R-8 208-884-5533 �C_ - R 15 SUBJECT: H-2022-0083 R-15 Modern Craftsman MDA R1 C-N � UT LOCATION: Project is located at 4701 W. Caragana L-O � Lane,on the northeast corner of N. Black o Cat Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. (SH R-1$ RUT R-8 20/26),in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 22,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. R"8 R•A_ I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to modify the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #20-174161)provision regarding the two-story commercial building now proposed as a single-story structure with surface parking on 2.59 acres of land in the C-C zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brandon Sheltrown,HB Arch—Corner Office Design 2997 E. Deerhill Drive,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owners: Ryan Sexton,Baron Black Cat LLC— 1401 17t1i Street, Suite 700,Denver,CO 80202 . C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in 12/28/2022 newspaper Radius notice mailed to properties within 500 feet 12/30/2022 Page 1 Public hearing notice sign posted 12/19/2022 NextDoor Posting 12/30/2022 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS History The subject application encompasses one(1)parcel on the northeast corner of Black Cat Road and W. Chinden Boulevard. This parcel is part of a Development Agreement Modification in 2020 and was removed from an existing Development Agreement(DA)for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations(H-2020-00226,DA Inst. #2020-174261). The new Development Agreement consists of a Rezone of a total of 23.63 acres of land for the purpose of reducing the C-C zone from approximately 8 acres to 4.23 acres and increasing the R-15 zone from approximately 15.1 acres to 19.39 acres of land; a Short Plat consisting of 2 building lots and 2 common lots on 21.59 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts; and a Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 196 residential units on 20.13 acres in the R-15 zone. Development Agreement Modification The approved DA(Inst. #2020-174261)includes a provision that requires the proposed commercial building located near the intersection of N. Black Cat Road and W. Chinden Boulevard to be constructed as a two-story structure. The two-story option,though a larger floorplate and building, provided only 5,185 square-feet of ground floor retail and active use area; the remaining 8,538 square feet is dedicated to a tuck-under parking area. Approximately 13l'-0"of the Chinden Boulevard elevation is attributed to the parking garage which provides no active ground floor use along this extent of the fagade. The Applicant believes that the parking garage prevents visibility to the ground floor retail areas from Chinden Boulevard limiting areas of tenant visibility;therefore,providing challenging leasing for the ground floor commercial area and flexible tenant layouts. Currently,the anticipated restaurant tenant and other potential retailers necessitate modifying the previous building design and parking quantities to be better align to meet the commercial market demands while lessening potential impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. The Applicant is proposing a 7,004-square-foot one-story commercial building that is highly visible and establishes a cornerstone for the overall Modern Craftsman at Black Cat residential development. Tenant visibility is provided on all sides of the building to the retail and restaurant activities within the building. Additionally, a 563 square-foot outdoor covered patio area is planned for a restaurant tenant to use activating the fagade along Chinden Boulevard by showcasing the restaurant activity within the building. The proposed building varies in parapet heights ranging from 25'8"and 22'0", presenting a ground-floor window height of 12'0"along all facades. The design echoes the previous quality design with the same modem/contemporary architectural materials originally presented such as stucco, cultured stone, composite wood, dark bronze aluminum storefront glazing, and standing seam metal roofing reflecting the similar quality and colorways of the overall Modern Craftsman at Black Cat Development. Staff has analyzed the parking using the restaurant standards requiring one (1)parking stall for every 250 square feet of gross floor area to ensure adequate parking. Per this standard, 28 parking stalls would be required if the site developed per the submitted revised concept plan and 42 parking stalls were provided. Additionally,the commercial square footage was a topic of discussion during the initial Hearing. Ultimately, Council agreed with Staff and required the two- story commercial building to ensure the MU-C (Mixed Use Community) area would develop with a higher commercial square footage to provide more of a balance with the proposed residential development on this site. Fundamentally,the Applicants proposal for a one-story building on this site includes more retail square footage than the required two-story building, as the two-story building Page 2 essentially provided less ground floor square footage for retail space,presenting the illusion it was larger due to the tuck-under parking area. The Applicant is therefore requesting the following modification to provision 5.1.h: "The proposed commercial building located near the intersection of N. Black Cat Road and W. Chinden Boulevard(SH2O/26) shall be constructed as a two stems one-story structure as generally depicted in the revised concept renderings(see Exhibit VI.E), and as noted on the revised CUP Conceptual Site Plan on Exhibit C." Staff recommends the development agreement modification with the recommended changes in Exhibits E and C below. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA per the modified provision in Section VI.B. B. The Meridian City Council heard this item on January 17,2023.At the public hearing the Council moved to approve the subject MDA request. I. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Elizabeth Koeckeritz, Givens Pursley; Ryan Sexton,Baron Properties: Greg Hector, Senior VP Construction Development for Baron b. In opposition:None c. Commenting None d. Written testimony: Jamie Knight: Evelyn and Albert Joens e. Staff presenting application: Stacy Hersh f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Pam 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Pam 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 3 VI. EXHIBITS A. Existing DA Provisions e, Additional right-of-way shall be reserved for dedication to Idaho Transportation District for the future widening of Chinden Boulevard,as shown on the plat as Lot 1, Block 1. f. The required landscape street buffers shall be constructed and vegetated along the entire perimeter(along N.Black Cat and Chinden Boulevard)with the first phase of development. g. The Applicant shall vegetate the common lot(Lot 1, Block 1), reserved for future dedication to Idaho Transportation Department(ITD),with grass and not gravel until such time that this lot is dedicated to ITD. h. The proposed commercial building located near the intersection of N.Black Cat Road and W.Chinden Boulevard(SH 2O)26)shall be constructed as a two-story structure as generally depicted in the submitted concept renderings(see exhibit VII.I)and as noted on the revised CLIP Site Plan. i. The Vertically Integrated Residential Project area of the site shall adhere to the specific use standards as outlined in UDC 11-4-3-41. j, The required land use buffer between the C-C zoning district and the R-15 zoning district is hereby waived as approved by City Council;the minimum distance between buildings and across zoning districts is ten(10)feet per the multi-family specific use standards(UDC I 1-4-3-27). 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: Page 4 B. Proposed Revisions to the existing Development Agreement Provision 5.l.h: Staff s Recommended Changes: "The proposed commercial building located near the intersection of N. Black Cat Road and W. Chinden Boulevard(SH2O/26) shall be constructed as a two stems one-story structure as generally depicted in the revised concept renderings(see Exhibit VILE , and as noted on the revised CUP Site Plan in Exhibit C." Page 5 C. Existing and Conceptual Site Plan: AEEAIL ' 5,165SF 0 {... '� RETAIL: I it A 7,D04SF •� PREVIOUS a PROPOSED H H I H H I I H ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN EDGES NON-ACTIVE/BLANK FACADE IIIIIIIIIIIII MAXIMIZED GLAZING ....... MINIMALGLAZING THE PREVIUDSCONCEPT DESIGN PHUYIDES MINIMAL,ACTIVE AND VISIBLE RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES-CHALLENGING TENANT LEASING. THE CURRENT CESIGN ACTIVATES ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDING MAXIMIZING TENANT VISIBILITY AND PRDVIDES AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE. SITE PLAN CACTIVEANDNON-ACTIYHBLANXFACAUES) GBH aaaoN 4 GOD i _ I I laY !' sue — � 11 AM 1 1 � Rwln l 1 1bG9 + II I IOII I , Sfi7S d .mM CN.CHd[UfilN:'3D7�' gg 1 1 Page 6 D. Previous 2-Story Elevations: 1. Comer Commercial Renderini -2-stoiN Conceu� 1� in Cc I� wi C AC.0 Pale 45 Pxr.1 GR Page 7 E. Proposed 1-Story Elevations: IMRIOR MATERIAL UGEHR GBp Yra GYYIII naslmmuulr wlrlur r mWl 311NYn.lWY4�[IElLG4Ne'Sk]Niq Gi =N31 4tTZ=[ mW NI[ - O]M.i11NIX MIllW!ia11Al0f fNY NIIYBI rrr �r=T 4rtf4W1fA 1rNWY 1'N.CIiOF itiifSA}IflN5!'1 _ G llnWl iLlin a - I Iy ryryry r�r� _ FlfWi i mm ful �� �H: NaAYslmnli l9mYYM rYY1 ____ >Sfl IEPY.. [Gu lat Wlu• ... wYi OlL ANIf[IF Mlfulu-•xauiniG —.... A r .M- IcIlm w.ravom.iwn.•, a _ R rir� Y d � m tlt Cp7tll AMI I Page 8 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Task Order 10022.a and Purchase Order No. 23-0198 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Facility Plan Update project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$490,923.00 i Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIAN�- City Council Members Joe Borton Tre-Beret Luke Cavener Public Works I D A H O Brad Hoaglun Jessica Perreault Department Liz Strader TO: Mayor Robert Simison Members of the City Council FROM: Clint Dolsby, P.E. Assistant City Engineer DATE: December 28, 2022 SUBJECT: TASK ORDER#10022a WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL PURSUANT TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT CATEGORY 2A FOR THE WRRF 2023 FACILITY PLAN UPDATE FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $490,923.00 I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve Task Order 1022a with Brown and Caldwell for the WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update for a not-to-exceed cost of$490,923.00. 2. Authorize the Purchasing Manager to sign the agreement. II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Clint Dolsby PE, Assistant City Engineer 489-0341 Warren Stewart PE, City Engineer 489-0350 Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 489-0259 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background The City of Meridian (City) is upgrading the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) to increase the level of treatment to meet expected lower National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits for total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia. In order to properly plan for both short-and long-term improvements necessary to meet these NPDES permit requirements, the City is completing a Facility Plan Update to replace their previous facility plan completed in 2018. This facility plan update will satisfy the Idaho Department of Environmental's rule that states, "all existing municipal wastewater treatment or disposal Public Works Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue,Suite 200, Meridian, 1D 83642 Phone 208-898-5500 . Fax 208-898-9551 . www.meridiancity.org facilities undergoing material modification or expansion, are required to have a current facility plan." B. Proposed Project The facility plan will document the plant improvements completed to date and will serve to provide the necessary planning and alternative evaluation documentation. It will provide a path forward to meet the NPDES Permit limits and fulfill IDAPA 58.01.06- Wastewater Rules, §410Facility and Design Standards for Municipal Wastewater Treatment or Disposal Facilities—Facility Plans for meeting wastewater treatment needs until 2043, taking into consideration conditions envisioned to build-out of the planning area. The facility plan will include a capital improvement plan through 2033 and identify preferred wastewater and biosolids treatment and disposal options. C. Consultant Selection Brown and Caldwell was selected for this project due to their expertise in the planning, design and analysis of wastewater treatment plants and their work on similar wastewater facility planning projects. IV. IMPACT A. Strategic Impact: This project meets our mission requirements to identify and prioritize work to anticipate,plan and provide public services and facilities that support the needs of our growing community, ensure modern, reliable facilities while maintaining financial stewardship and maintaining the ability to meet the changing permit limit requirements. B. Fiscal Impact: Project Costs WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update $490,923.00 Total Cost $490,923.00 Project Funding FY 2023 WRRF Facility Plan Update (3500-55000) $600,000.00 Total Funding $600,000.00 VI. TIME CONSTRAINTS Council's approval will allow this critical project at the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility to be completed this fiscal year. VII. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. Task Order No. 0022a Department Approval: Page 2 of 2 C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 2/7/2023 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: N/A Topic: Approval of Task Order 10022.a and Purchase Order No. 23-0198 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the WRRF Facility Plan Update project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$490,923.00. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Task Order #10549.b and Purchase Order 23-0198. Background: TASK ORDER NO. 10022.a Pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND BROWN AND CALDWELL (CONSULTANT) This Task Order is made this 71" day of February, 2023 and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by BROWN AND CALDWELL, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and conditions contained in the Master Agreement (category 2a) between the above- mentioned parties dated October 1 , 2020. The Project Name for this Task Order is as follows: WRRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE PROJECT UNDERSTANDING SUMMARY The City of Meridian (City) is upgrading the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) to respond to growth in the service area and to increase the level of treatment to meet lower Idaho Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (IPDES) effluent permit limits for total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia. In order to properly plan for both short- and long-term improvements necessary to meet these IPDES permit requirements, the City is completing a Facility Plan Update to supplement their previous facility plan completed in 2018. This Facility Plan Update will also serve to prepare the necessary planning and alternative evaluation documentation needed for regulatory approval and will incorporate all portions required by Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. The Facility Plan Update will include the following tasks: • Task 1 — Project Management • Task 2 — Facility Plan SCOPE OF WORK Task 1 Project Management 1.1 Project Management Activities Objective. To manage, administer, and provide ongoing coordination for utilization of resources for the project. This task includes technical and financial management of the contract and acting as liaison with the City, operational staff, and project team. Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 1 of 11 Brown&Caldwell Approach. Major activities include the following: • All communication from the consultant regarding the project will include the City project manager (PM) or designee. The City PM will be responsible for coordinating and providing all review comments and the resolution of all issues to the Engineer in a timely manner (typically 14 calendar days for design review); all other decisions will be provided to the Engineer within 7 calendar days or less. The Engineer PM will be responsible for drafting meeting minutes. • The Engineer will document any and all requested changes to the scope of work using a Project Change Request form. The Engineer PM will collaborate with the City PM to develop an approach for addressing the change(s). The City PM will review all changes for approval and provide the Engineer with written approval prior to modifying the existing scope, schedule, or budget and prior to proceeding with any new or unscoped work activities. • This subtask includes the following activities: o Develop a Project Management Plan and Quality Plan for internal use. o Prepare monthly project status reports. Progress reports will identify budget status, progress status, activities of the previous month, and upcoming activities. o Attend project kickoff meeting with City staff. o Attend up to four (4) coordination meetings with City staff. City Responsibilities. Provide the following: • Identification of a PM with final authority for City decisions. • Timely review of products and decisions on issues critical to scheduled progress. • Identification and involvement of appropriate City staff. • Coordination of collected comments and resolution of any conflicting comments from all City reviewers prior to returning to the Engineer. Deliverables. Deliverables for the tasks listed above include the following items: • Monthly progress reports and invoices • Meeting minutes, as required 1.2 City Workshops Objective. Present the progress made on the Facility Plan and review key decisions and recommendations with City staff. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Prepare for and conduct up to five (5) workshops with City staff through the life of the project to communicate progress made on the Facility Plan Update, review pertinent key topics, and plan next steps. Each workshop is assumed to be 3 hours in duration. It is assumed that two (2) workshops will require the attendance of one out-of-town BC team member. All workshops will have up to four BC team members in attendance. Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 2 of 11 Brown&Caldwell • Document the workshops and provide a summary of action items to team members at the conclusion of each workshop. Deliverables. • Workshop agendas, materials, minutes, and summary of action items. 1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Objective. Present the progress made on the Facility Plan and review key decisions and recommendations with City staff. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Implement a QA/QC program as defined in the Quality Plan to review products from this scope. City and regulatory agency review comments will also be incorporated to prepare and complete the final facility plan documents. Additionally, the City is assumed to participate in this process and provide independent review of products. • Consultant will provide appropriate calculation and deliverable QA/QC reviews by in- house, senior staff members. Task 2 Facility Plan 2.1 Investigate Existing Wastewater System Conditions Objective. To present the current and currently planned (in design or construction) systems for the Meridian WRRF, including capacity of each major unit process. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Identify the existing City planning area. • Conduct a survey of the existing facilities with Meridian staff. Include in this: — Discuss equipment condition/age based on interview with WRRF operations and maintenance staff. — Incorporate results of the 2020 Fermenter Analysis when determining carbon demand/chemical storage capacity. — Incorporate current upgrades for existing aeration basins, Digester 6, sidestream phosphorus, and tertiary filtration that are in design or construction for updating existing system capacity. — Incorporate existing water reuse practices. — Discuss existing environmental conditions in the planning area. — Incorporate a discussion on the limitations of the existing outfall system to the Boise River. — Provide description of current IPDES permit. • Review the last 5 years of historical influent flows, loads, and population in the City • Review any planned flow reduction measures for the City, including: — I&I reductions in the collection system Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 3 of 11 Brown&Caldwell — Water conservation around the City — Water conservation requirements for new and existing housing developments, commercial developments, and industries within the City • Related water quality planning documentation, including- - State water quality requirements for receiving waters in the service area — Designated uses for receiving waters — Water quality and technology based effluent limitations — Current TMDL issues for the receiving waters as they relate to future IPDES permit limitations — Related City water resources planning (if different from 2018 facility plan) — Related air quality permits City Responsibilities. Provide the following: — Provide daily historical operating data for the past five (5) years. — Provide the most recent set of facility flow and loading projections. — Attend operation/maintenance staff interview meeting to discuss equipment condition/age. — Provide access to WRRF design data, including drawings, equipment submittal documents, product data, and relevant plans and studies, upon request. Deliverables. — Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask. 2.2 Wastewater Characterization Objective. To collect and organize WRRF liquid and solids stream data for recalibration of the WRRF's BioWin model. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Prepare a sampling plan for a 14-day wastewater characterization to be conducted at the WRRF. Sampling will include daily grab and composite sampling of multiple constituents at several points in the WWRF's liquid and solids treatment processes. It will also include one day of diurnal sampling for select constituents. Wastewater characterization data will be used to calibrate biological process models in the capacity assessment described below. • Hold a meeting to discuss the sampling plan and to distribute responsibilities between BC, the City, and contract laboratories. • Coordinate the conduct of the sampling, providing direction to City staff regarding sampling times and locations. City Responsibilities. Provide the following: • Review and comment on the wastewater characterization sampling plan. Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 4 of 11 Brown&Caldwell • Participate in the wastewater characterization meeting. • Collect wastewater characterization samples, conduct laboratory analyses, and send samples to contract laboratories (as required). Deliverables. • Wastewater sampling plan. • Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask. 2.3 Capacity Assessment Update Objective. To update the total capacity of the WRRF operating as designed, with all units in service, as well as the IDEA-defined firm capacity with the largest of each type of process unit out of service. Also to prioritize processes for optimization and upgrade. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Construct a solids mass balance based upon historical data and data obtained during the wastewater characterization. Assess mass balance closure across various WRRF unit processes in order to determine data gaps, irregularities, or inconsistencies in the data record. Use calibrated mass balance to project system loadings for use in the following tasks. • Update the WRRF hydraulic profile as needed, using Visual Hydraulics software. Portions of the profile were updated for Aeration Basins 9-10/1-4 Retrofit project. • Update the primary sedimentation performance model to project loadings to the secondary process. This will include a statistical correlation of recent historical TSS and BOD removals with hydraulic and mass loading. • Calibrate BioWin activated sludge process model with data collected during the wastewater characterization. • Use calibrated BioWin models to simulate performance across a range of flows and loads, for up to a maximum of two (2) different operating conditions, as selected by the City. Conditions may include the following variables: O Seasonal condition: summer, winter O Effluent target condition: final permit O Units in service: primary clarifiers, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, fermenter (or just chemical), tertiary filters • Use the updated models to project a suite of WRRF parameters, including effluent characteristics, effluent loadings, secondary clarifier loadings, WAS flow and loadings, and RAS flows. • Update the secondary clarification system state point analysis (SPA) model using recent WRRF historical data. The SPA model is a graphical approach to determining secondary clarifier capacity, with no sampling or onsite testing. The model depends upon flow, mixed liquor settleability (characterized via the sludge volume index [SVI]), clarifier surface area, and RAS flow rate. The model does not account for unique clarifier geometry including center wells, launders, depth, or energy dissipating inlet Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 5 of 11 Brown&Caldwell structures. Use the calibrated SPA model, in concert with the biological model outputs, to project the capacity of the secondary clarifiers. • Update the capacity of the solids handing treatment processes as needed, including DAFT, fermentation, digestion, and dewatering. Capacity will be evaluated through analysis of plant historical data and manufacturer's rated capacities of unit processes, with no onsite sampling or testing. • Update the capacity of the disinfection and tertiary filtration systems using vendor specifications, design calculations, and plant performance data. • Combine the information from all above items in this subtask to form an integrated assessment of the plant capacity and bottlenecks, with a prioritized list of bottlenecks and composite rating diagrams. City Responsibilities. Provide the following: • Provide access to Plant design data, including drawings, equipment submittal documents, product data, and relevant plans and studies, upon request. • Provide operating levels and typical recycle rates for unit processes as needed. • Conduct water surface elevation measurements as needed. • Review and comment on the capacity recommendations. Deliverables. • Chapter(s) in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask. 2.4 Planning Criteria Objective. Identify the planning criteria for use in alternatives evaluation and capital improvements planning for the Facility Plan. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Use the population and industry growth flow and loading projections developed as part of the Sewer Master Plan Update. • Develop projections for primary and secondary solids production based on flow and load projections from the Sewer Master Plan Update. • Develop/update projections for biogas production based on digestion technology and solids production projections. • Establish future discharge split to water reuse vs. Five Mile Creek. • Discuss potential future discharge criteria, including nutrients, microconstituents/compounds of emerging concern, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). • Establish potential future discharge criteria for IPDES discharge or reclaimed water permits for anticipated flows and loads, depending on point of final discharge. Deliverables. • Chapter on future conditions for the Facility Plan. Task Order 10022.a W RRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 6 of 11 Brown&Caldwell 2.5 Liquid and Solids Treatment Analysis Objective. Evaluate alternatives for upgrading the Meridian WRRF to meet planning criteria requirements for both liquids and solids streams. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Based on revised capacity assessment and flow/load projections, update timeline presented in 2018 facility plan for adding clarifiers and aeration basins, along with digesters and solids handling processes. • Evaluate potential energy and chemical-saving liquid stream process improvements, including ammonia-based aeration control (ABAC), low DO aeration basin operation, and hydrocyclone wasting. Do not evaluate future new technologies for biological treatment expansion (i.e., no evaluation of IFAS alternatives for expansion). • Update discussion and cost analysis (AACE Class 5) for a secondary road access to the treatment facility from the North or West side of the facility. • Evaluate solids-stream discharge improvements, including planned dryer upgrades and biogas expansion project. Provide planning level (AACE Class 5) cost estimate for alternatives identified for the solids system expansions. • Provide costs for liquid process expansion based on the Aeration Basins 9-10/1-4 Retrofit design project. • Provide rough site plan showing plant layout for recommended alternatives. Include preliminary site planning for future facilities on the 40 acres owned by the City north of the WRRF. Site plans will not be done in CAD. • Recommend alternatives based on cost evaluation and input from the City. For the final selected alternatives for the facility (both solids and liquids)- - Identify any site security limitations/requirements. — Identify future aesthetic needs for the facility (odor control, noise control, traffic control on and off site). — Provide a staffing and organization evaluation, including future needs for staffing, organization of the utility, and projected costs of O&M for the expansion option. — Provide an evaluation of non-treatment process needs, including administrative office space, lab space, maintenance space, and equipment storage space. This will include an evaluation of the future of the mechanical building, including the limitations and constraints (e.g., electrical and communications) that could trigger a need to change or reorganize the functions that reside there. — Incorporating findings of other City studies into utility systems. These would include non-potable water, gas, communications, and electrical systems within the site. Deliverables. • Report chapters for discussion of alternatives and recommendation for expansion to be incorporated into the Facility Plan report. Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 7 of 11 Brown&Caldwell 2.6 Other Related Evaluations Objective. Reference previous evaluation for resource recovery options and options for potential future permit limits not in the current permit. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Reference and provide brief update on Resource Recovery Study from 2018 Facility Plan. No additional resource recovery evaluation will be conducted. Deliverables. • Brief report section to be incorporated into the Facility Plan report. 2.7 CIP Objective. Prepare a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for the Meridian WRRF that provides a clear outline of the regulatory-required and maintenance/age related replacement projects between 2023 and 2043 (including estimated cost and approximate year for initiation of each project). It is assumed the City will complete their own financial options evaluation for funding of projects. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Based on the recommendations from Subtask 4, assess the delivery methods for project delivery for projects identified to support the selected alternative. The delivery analysis will consider project grouping and potential delivery methods to meet regulatory, financial, and organizational constraints. • Using updated flow and loading estimates, IPDES permit renewal conditions, and capacity assessment, prepare a CIP for the Meridian WRRF. This CIP will include planning-level (AACE Class 5) cost estimates for projects and an estimated project initiation date. • Evaluate replacement schedule for major equipment and parts, based on equipment age and/or condition. This replacement schedule will include biotower media, new tertiary filter membranes, solids handling equipment, and any other critical equipment with high maintenance costs that would be incurred in the analysis period. Deliverables. • Report chapter to be incorporated into the Facility Plan Report. 2.8 Facility Plan Development Objective. Prepare a comprehensive facilities plan document that summarizes the findings from the above tasks and provides a clear framework for improvements to the Meridian WRRF. Approach. Major activities include the following: • Summarize activities from Subtask 1 through Subtask 7, including a comprehensive CIP that will include costs and schedule for improvements, in a draft Facility Plan. It is assumed that the draft Facility Plan will require the synthesis of information from Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 8 of 11 Brown&Caldwell the previous tasks for presentation to the IDEA. The Facility Plan will be reviewed by a senior reviewer prior to being submitted to the City. • Prepare a final Facility Plan that provides a clear action plan for WRRF Upgrades. • Prepare for and lead up to two meetings with the City and the IDEA to discuss the findings of the Facility Plan and the City's intended action plan for expansion. It is assumed that two members of BC team will attend each of these two-hour meetings. Deliverables. • Agenda and meeting materials for up to two meetings with the IDEA to discuss the findings of the Facility Plan. • Draft Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted electronically to the City for one round of review and comment. • Final Draft Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted electronically to the IDEA for one round of review and comment. • Final version of Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted in electronic and hardcopy format to the City and the IDEA. ASSUMPTIONS • Note that work scope is conceptual in nature, based on limited information, and should only be relied upon for general planning purposes. • Consultant will rely upon, without independent information, information from third parties, including available information related to reports related to key plant processes. • It is assumed that the facility will not change process configurations for liquids or solids stream treatment, though process or energy performance enhancement may be achieved with upgrades as described in Task 2 Subtask 5. • Recommendations and potential energy savings are based upon many data points and assumptions. Many of these variables are affected by the influent characteristics, costs of electricity and natural gas, planning level construction estimates, and O&M costs. Final results will depend on the variables which should be considered and reconfirmed as part of any preliminary design of potential improvements. • The evaluation will rely on the accuracy of record drawings and historical records provided by the City. If drawings, data, or historical records are deemed to inaccurate, additional field effort may be required. BC will alert the City if expanded field effort is required over what was anticipated at the time the scope was prepared. • For the wastewater characterization, the City will either conduct laboratory analyses in house or will contract directly with a send-out laboratory to conduct analyses. Shipping and analytical costs are not included in this scope of work. City staff will conduct sampling and preserve, store, organize, and assemble samples for shipping and/or analyses. • Estimates of digester gas production, variability, and quality design criteria will be based upon current digester gas production rates reported by the City relative to volatile solids reduction (VSR), variability in gas production reported by the City and any gas quality data provided by the City. Should information from the City be Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 9 of 11 Brown&Caldwell unavailable, typical design values will be used. Final results will depend on the quality and quantity of the data available from the City, and should be reconfirmed as part of any preliminary design of potential improvements. • Any permits (including air) and associated support beyond those identified may be considered as additional services. • The opinions of probable construction costs will be prepared to industry standards but will be subject to many influences including, but not limited to, price of labor and materials, schedule impacts, unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures, and time or quality of performance by others. These types of issues are difficult to forecast and are out of the control of BC and that actual costs may vary substantially from the estimates prepared by BC. BC is therefore unable to guarantee the accuracy of opinion of probable construction costs beyond that of industry standards. • The City will make available in a timely manner all drawings, records and site information obtained relative to the project, including topographical survey, and information related to any and all underground utilities, hazardous materials, easements, permits, geotechnical investigations, lab data, environmental surveys, etc. as necessary for completion of the work under the above detailed scope. • The site does not have any environmental related concerns including contaminated soil, endangered species, etc. that would impact alternatives implementation or associated cost estimates. Environmental studies, including Phase 1 surveys or any other type of study/survey are not included as part of this project scope. If any regulatory agencies require additional studies be performed, they can be added as additional services, but may impact the overall project schedule. • The initial effort is limited to the cost identified in the attached fee estimate. If the effort to complete the identified tasks exceeds the estimate, the PM will coordinate with the City to identify areas we can limit our effort to the available budget. • Recommendations for future improvements that relate to specific nutrient reductions or other regulated requirements will be based upon our current understanding of requirements for future permits as provided by the City of Meridian. KEY PERSONNEL Dan Berthe Zach Dobroth dberthe@brwncald.com zdobroth@brwncald.com (208) 389-7782 (208) 389-7728 Rick Kelly rkelly@brwncald.com (206) 749-2327 Dan Berthe will perform the administrative function including all program, policy, and contractual issues. Dan Berthe and Zach Dobroth will be responsible for coordination during the study phase and oversee all technical and project management activities associated with the task order scope of work. Rick Kelly will provide technical oversight and overall QA/QC. Task Order 10022.a W RRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 10 of 11 Brown&Caldwell TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Task Description Estimated Completion Date Compensation 1 I Project Management ■ February 27, 2024 $96,870 1.1 Project Management Activities ■ 1.2 City Workshops ■ 1.3 QA/QC ■ 2 Facility Plan ■ February 27, 2024 $394,053 Investigate Existing 2.1 Wastewater System Conditions draft chapter ■ February 10, 2023 2.2 Subtask 2—Wastewater Characterization draft chapter ■ March 27, 2023 Subtask 3—Capacity 2.3 Assessment Update draft chapter ■ June 26, 2023 2.4 Subtask 4— Planning Criteria draft chapter ■ February 17, 2023 Subtask 5— Liquid and Solids 2.5 Treatment Analysis draft chapter ■ August 1, 2023 2.6 Subtask 6—Other Related Evaluations draft chapter ■ April 24, 2023 2.7 Subtask 7—CIP draft chapter ■ August 29, 2023 2.8 Subtask 8— Facility Plan draft report ■ January 16, 2024 Facility Plan final report ■ February 27, 2024 TASK ORDER TOTAL: $490,923 The Not-To-Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is (four hundred ninety thousand nine hundred and twenty-three dollars) ($490,923). No compensation will be paid over the Not-to-Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. No travel or expenses will be reimbursed through this agreement. All costs must be incorporated in the individual tasks within the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN BROWNANP CALDWELL, INC. By: By: KEITH WATTS, Procurement Manager MARTHA KNOWLTON, Vice President Dated: 2-7-2023 Dated: 1/20/23 2-7-2023 City Project Manager: Approved by City Council: Tyson Glock Task Order 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Plan Update Page 11 of 11 Brown&Caldwell (:�4`WEDIANI."_*�Nio) Purchase Order 2/7/2023 23-0198 Attention: Clint Dolsby CITY OF MERIDIAN Billing Attn: Finance 33 Ave 33 EAST BROADWAY AVE. Meridian, IDa Address: 83642 MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208) 888-4433 Shipping 33 E Broadway Ave. Vendor Address: Address: Ste. 200 Meridian, ID 83642 BROWN & CALDWELL PO BOX 45208 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94145-0208 Shipping Method: Contractor FOB: Destination Pre-Paid Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total 23-0198 TO 10022.a WRRF 2023 Facility Master Plan Update Dollar 490923.00 1.00 490,923.00 Purchase Order Total: $490,923.00 Purchasing Manager: Special Instructions Task Order 10022.a WRRF Facility Master Plan Not-To-Exceed $490,923.00 60-3500-55000-10022.a Approved by Council 2/7/2023 Ticket#86568 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Task Order 11367 and Purchase Order No. 23-0202 to Keller Associates, Inc. for the Water Master Plan Update 2023 project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $348,750 C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 2/7/2023 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: N/A Topic: Approval of Task Order 11367 and Purchase Order No. 23-0202 to Keller Associates, Inc. for the Water Master Plan Update 2023 project for the Not-To- Exceed amount of $348,750. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Task Order #11367 and Purchase Order 23-0202. Background: TASK ORDER NO. 11367 Pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC. (ENGINEER) This Task Order is made this 71" day of February, 2023 and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and accepted by KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Engineer" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and conditions contained in the Master Agreement (Category 1 C) between the above-mentioned parties dated October 1 , 2022. The Project Name for this Task Order is as follows: WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2023 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The CITY has contracted with the ENGINEER to provide an update to their water master plan last completed in 2018. The ENGINEER's scope of work has been developed based on the following project description. As the project moves forward, some of the information may change or be refined, and additional information will become known, resulting in the possible need to change, refine, or supplement the scope of work. The CITY provides water to approximately 130,000 residents as well as commercial, institutional, and industrial users. The water system consists of approximately 675 miles of pipeline, 25 wells, three booster stations, five pressure zones, and three storage tanks. The objectives of this study will be to update planning criteria, identify existing and future water system needs, and develop an updated capital improvement plan. SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 : PROJECT MANAGEMENT & PROGRESS MEETINGS 1 .1 Project Management. Provide general project administration services including contract administration, project accounting, monthly progress reports, scheduling, and internal project administration TASK ORDER 11367—water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 1 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. 1 .2 Kickoff Meeting. Prepare for and attend a project kickoff meeting with the CITY. The purpose of this meeting will be to review/establish CITY design criteria, establish communication channels, review the overall project schedule including major milestones and meetings, review objectives of the study, discuss available data and published materials that will be made available by the CITY, and review process for deliverables including process for CITY review and approval. 1 .3 Progress Meetings. Attend project review meetings at a regular interval to discuss progress, review findings, and other project needs. Meetings are anticipated to approximately once a month, with more frequent meetings as the project begins, then less frequently as the project matures, with meetings at key milestones to review findings and solicit CITY input. Project budget assumes up to 18 review meetings. Assumptions: • Project management budget assumes a project schedule of up to 18 months. • Unless otherwise noted, meetings/workshops may include a combination of in person or virtual attendees. This assumption applies to this task as well as subsequent tasks. Deliverables: • Monthly progress reports. • Meeting agendas and meeting notes. TASK 2: DATA ACQUISITION & FACILITY TOURS ENGINEER Responsibilities 2.1 Request for Information. A request for information will be prepared by the ENGINEER describing the information needed including, but not limited to, the following items: a. Daily water supply production data for each water source from 2018 (or earlier, depending on when the analysis ended in the previous planning study) through December 31 , 2022. Provide this in spreadsheet format. b. Total annual water demand summary for 2017-2022 Assist in identifying and quantifying unmetered water usage (i.e., hydrant flushing, construction water, etc.) c. Water meter consumption data for 2021 and 2022 (previous 2 years) in spreadsheet format. Preferably have each account on a unique row, with columns for name, address, meter ID, customer class (i.e., residential, commercial, industrial), and each month's water consumption. d. Summary of 2022 monthly wastewater influent data. Identify and quantify major wastewater users that 1) have separate water supplies, and 2) are largely consumptive users in the wintertime (i.e. bottling plant). e. 24-hour SCADA data for pumping rates, reservoir levels, and PRV flows for July and August 2022. For pumping facilities include well drawdown or suction pressure (where available), discharge pressures, and flow rates. For PRV control valves provide TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 2 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. upstream and downstream pressure (where available and reliable) and flow rates. Provide in spreadsheet format with time increments of 1 to 15 minutes. f. Water quality monitoring data for sources with existing deficiencies/concerns. Provide Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs) from previous three years. g. Summary of annual capital and replacement expenses for the previous five years. h. Existing 10-year Capital Improvement Plan. i. Record drawings for major pumping and storage facilities. j. Current water model in InfoWater format with existing, preliminary plat, and future model scenarios. k. GIS base mapping, including roadways, parcel lines, political boundaries, land use, topographic contours, current aerial imagery, water facility locations, hydrants, valves, and pipelines (along with material, age and size attributes). Provide a shapefile showing areas irrigated by City water versus those with separate pressure irrigation supplies. Include unique meter IDs and meter shapefile for linking water meter data. I. Provide COMPASS data for existing and future residential and job data by Traffic Analysis Zone. m. Reported well/booster production rates, pump curves, and well drawdown information. n. Available water rights information. o. Asset management data for water facilities in spreadsheet format. p. Summary of existing system controls (i.e., pump on/off settings, VFD settings, and pressure control and flow control setpoints) q. Storage tank inspection reports. r. Existing staff org chart with job descriptions. s. Other related planning documents (i.e. risk and resilience, vulnerability, emergency response, water management and conservation, curtailment, water supply, water rights, source water protection, and treatment/corrosion plans/studies, including recent Well 23 treatment options study) t. List of known problems/issues. 2.2 Pump Testing. ENGINEER will review SCADA for the 25 wells and with input from the CITY identify up to 10 pumping facilities to run pump tests for. Pump tests will include observation of available suction and discharge pressures and flow meter readings to be compared with the available pump curves. 2.3 Hydrant Testing. Develop a hydrant testing plan to collect data to be used in model calibration. ENGINEER will provide two personnel to support the first day of hydrant flow testing. As part of calibration, follow-up testing may be recommended. ENGINEER will provide input on recommended subsequent testing and provide up to one day of additional follow-up testing support. 2.4 Data Collection and Review. Collection and processing of furnished data, mapping, and reports. Provide a follow-up Request for Information for supplemental data. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 3 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. CITY Responsibilities • Provide requested critical data within two weeks of request. • Complete field work and provide sampling/testing, if required. • Provide access to facilities and records. Provide at least one staff to assist with pump testing. Provide sounder to check well drawdown levels and check that pressure gauges/transducers accurately report pressures ahead of tests. • Provide three staff for first day of hydrant testing. Provide support as needed for subsequent fire hydrant flow testing. Be responsible for public notices, traffic control (if required), and controlling and observing system operations during hydrant testing. Provide additional hydrant testing, as required. Assumptions • ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of the information provided by CITY, CITY's consultants and Contractors, information from public records, and information ordinarily or customarily furnished by others, including, but not limited to specialty Contractors, manufacturers, suppliers, and publishers of technical standards. This assumption applies to this and subsequent tasks. • If required, environmental permitting and field work (i.e., wetland delineations/investigations, biological assessments, and cultural resource surveys) will be provided as an additional service. This assumption applies to this and subsequent tasks. Deliverables • Requests for Information • Hydrant Testing Plan TASK 3: EXISTING WATER SYSTEM 3.1 Location. Provide brief description of project location. 3.2 Base Map. Update the existing system base map, showing location of key facilities and pipelines and pressure zone boundaries. 3.3 Water System Description. Provide description of the existing water system including a summary of pipelines, supply sources, booster stations, storage reservoirs, pressure relief and flow control valves, and pressure zones. Prepare system schematic showing supply sources, booster stations, storage reservoirs, target hydraulic grades, and control valves. Documentation may include summary figures, tables, and supporting documentation. 3.4 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 4 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. TASK 4: PROJECT PLANNING AND DEMAND ANALYSIS ENGINEER Responsibilities 4.1 Study Area. Assist CITY in identifying the 5-, 20-year, and buildout service areas. It is anticipated that the existing city impact area will be used for this study area. 4.2 Growth Trends. Review the COMPASS projections for residential and non-residential (measured by # of employees) land use designations by traffic analysis zone (TAZ). If TAZs overlap the study area boundary, allocate the portion within the study area based on proportionate areas. Project build-out populations based on land-use and development densities for the study area. 4.3 Water Demand Analysis. a. Review Water Production. Review water production data supplied by the CITY. Evaluate seasonal variations in water demand. Develop average day, maximum day, and peak hour design demands. Summarize demands per equivalent dwelling unit and per capita. b. Daily Demand Trends. Review SCADA data from a peak period to assess the CITY's 24-hour water usage pattern for the whole water system. Develop a demand curve for each pressure zone for use in evaluating peak hour demands and peaking storage requirements. c. Review Water Consumption. Summarize water consumption data from 2021 and 2022 by type (residential, commercial, and other billing classes). Document top consumptive users and assess percent of total annual consumption. With input from the CITY, identify areas where potable water is used for irrigation and assess the impacts of irrigation use (i.e., gpcd for residential parcels with separate pressure irrigation supply compared to those without separate pressure irrigation supply). Compare influent flows at the wastewater treatment plant to the consumption data. d. Evaluate Water Loss. Water production data will be compared to water consumption data for the previous five years to assess the amount of unaccounted for water. Considerations for hydrant flushing, construction water, and other activities will be included in amount of unaccounted for water where this information is readily available. e. Demand Projections. Use historical water data and COMPASS projections to develop 5-year, 20-year, and build-out demand projections for the study area. Projected demands will be summarized systemwide and by pressure zone. Impact of water conservation on future water demands will be considered in the demand projections. Build-out population projections will be made based on development density information provided by the CITY. Build-out demand projections will be provided to CITY for use in requesting a reasonably anticipated future needs (RAFN) water right. f. Fire Flow Demands. Summarize desired fire flow requirements per local fire authority requirements. Assign up to 150 individual building fire flow demands per Idaho Surveying and Rating Bureau. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 5 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. 4.4 Additional Planning Criteria Considerations. Summarize additional regulatory and industry standard planning criteria for water supply redundancy, storage requirements (operational, peaking, emergency, and fire storage components), mechanical redundancy, minimum and maximum operating pressures, hydrant spacing, and maximum peak hour pipeline velocities. 4.5 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Provide input and approval on growth projections and planning criteria. • Assist in coordinating with local fire authority. • Provide review and comments of draft write-up. Assumptions • Planning criteria will not be changed once established. Changing planning criteria may result in rework which can be completed as an additional service. Deliverables • Draft Project Planning write-up. • Project meeting agenda and minutes. TASK 5: WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE ENGINEER Responsibilities 5.1 Water Rights. Document existing water rights including water right number, priority date, diversion rate, and status. 5.2 Supply and Delivery Evaluation. Compare existing and future projected water demands to the existing firm water supply capacity of the water system and available water rights. Summarize existing water supply deficiencies. Compare max day plus fire and peak hour demands to firm delivery capacity for each pressure zone. 5.3 Water Storage Evaluation. Calculate existing and future operational, peaking, emergency, and fire storage needs based on planning criteria. Consider delivery capacities of pumping facilities and control valves in identifying potential storage and delivery deficiencies within individual pressure zones. 5.4 Water Storage Recommendations. Summarize storage needs for the 5-year, 20-year and build-out planning period. Recommendations will be consistent with the future storage sites already secured by the CITY. 5.5 Long Term Water Supply. Summarize previous water rights and water supply analysis and findings (threats and mitigation activities) from documents made available by the CITY. Include a summary of potential benefits, drawbacks, and costs for participation in the Anderson Ranch and Cat Creek storage expansion projects. Summarize potential threats identified by the City or City's consultants. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 6 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. 5.6 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Provide previous water supply plan and recommendations. • Provide review and comments of draft write-up. Deliverables • Draft Water Supply and Storage write-up. • Project meeting agenda and minutes. TASK 6: WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ENGINEER Responsibilities 6.1 Water Model Software Selection. Assist the CITY in evaluating and selecting a water modeling software for use in this project and for future modeling needs. Model license costs, software reputation, ease of use, and anticipated level of effort for integrating the existing model will be considered in the recommendation. For budgeting purposes, ENGINEER has assumed the InfoWaterPro will be used. Changing to another software platform may result in additional software and model conversion costs. Meet with City to review findings and document recommendations in a technical memorandum. 6.2 Water Model Development. Use existing base mapping, record drawings, GIS, water demand information, pump curves, and CITY provided data to update the existing system model. Update water model pipes from preliminary plats layout to match record drawings and GIS for development which has occurred since the previous model update. Review water model pipes against GIS data to identify substantive discrepancies (i.e., changes in pipe connectivity and pipe size) between the two data sources. Incorporate existing system controls and setpoints to develop a 24-hour maximum day demand extended period simulation. 6.3 Water Model Calibration. Calibrate the updated water model to the hydrant testing data and boundary conditions gathered in Task 2. If system does not readily calibrate, review discrepancies in pipe looping, pipe sizes, and attempt to adjust model parameters to more closely reflect field conditions. Summarize locations where additional field investigation and model calibration may be warranted. 6.4 Existing System Evaluation. Exercise computer model to check system pressures and denote areas below 40 PSI and above 80 PSI. Evaluate system against fire flow planning criteria and report available fire flows and fire flow deficiencies. Allow time for two evaluations -- one with existing PRV settings and one with recommended settings if the existing setting result in fire flow deficiencies. Evaluate system headlosses and pipe velocities to identify potential transmission bottlenecks. Also exercise the 24-hour maximum day demand extended period model simulation to identify other potential issues, such as system controls, max and min pressures, and pipe velocities. Complete an extended period simulation to estimate water age within the system. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 7 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. 6.5 Future System Model Development and Evaluation. Expand model to include additional transmission pipe network to service the 5-year, 20-year, and build-out growth projections. Include additional well supply sources, storage tanks, and control valves. Add demands from new growth. Exercise the model to identify potential system deficiencies attributed to new growth. 6.6 Alternatives Evaluation. Where improvements are not relatively straightforward, evaluate alternatives for supply, distribution and storage that will be selected to resolve the system deficiencies and meet the target planning criteria. Utilize the computer model to develop future scenarios to reflect 5 year, 20-year and build-out growth needs and recommended improvements. Benefits and drawbacks will be summarized for each alternative. a. Supply Alternatives. Evaluate up to two supply alternatives that address the existing and anticipated future system deficiencies. For the Ustick Booster Site, evaluate alternatives to optimize utility of the site including blending both wells into the ground- level reservoir and rebuilding the booster station to supply zones 2 and 3 from storage. b. Storage Alternatives. Evaluate up to three storage alternatives that address the existing and anticipated future system deficiencies. c. Distribution Alternatives. Where improvements are not relatively straightforward, evaluate up to three distribution alternatives that could provide required fire flow and meet desired pressures. Alternatives to improve looping and reduce water age within the system will also be evaluated. Provide discussion on general pipeline alternatives including replacement and parallel pipelines. Additional refinement of pipeline alternatives is anticipated to occur in future predesign tasks associated with these projects. 1) Evaluate alternatives for new Pressure Zone 6 boundary and supply. 2) Evaluate alternatives to modify the Pressure Zone 2/3 boundary. 6.7 Hydrant Coverage Assessment. Create a map illustrating hydrant current coverage and identify areas with insufficient coverage. Hydrant coverage will be based on horizontal distance (straight line) from the center of the hydrant and slopes or changes in elevation will not be considered. Recommendations for additional hydrants will be made. 6.8 Site Plan/Schematics. Develop a master plan concept map and/or figures showing selected alternatives. 6.9 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Review and comment on draft documents. Assumptions • Assumes water model software selection is made prior to beginning modeling tasks. • Budget includes a $7,500 for modeling software fee and would cover WaterCAD, InfoWaterPro, or Aquanuity. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 8 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. • If model does not readily calibrate to existing conditions, and additional field work is recommended to troubleshoot the CITY's water system, these services can be completed as an additional service. Deliverables • Technical Memorandum recommending model software for this project and future modeling. • Meeting agendas and minutes. • Draft water distribution system write-up. TASK 7: WATER QUALITY AND TREATMENT 7.1 Water Quality Regulations. Document existing and pending water quality regulations and health advisories that pertain to the CITY's groundwater supply sources. Summarize potential impacts to the CITY's current treatment process. 7.2 Water Quality Requirements. Document existing water quality concerns based on reported water quality data from the CITY and from the previous three years CCRs. 7.3 Lead and Copper. Summarize preliminary findings and status compliance activities pertaining to the new Lead and Copper Rule. 7.4 Water Treatment Alternatives. Provide up to three alternatives for treatment or mitigation of existing water quality concerns. a. Document existing iron and manganese concerns, current treatment practices, and summarize anticipated technologies to be considered for additional facilities targeted by the City. b. Document existing uranium concerns and provide high level summary of mitigation strategies and treatment alternatives available, including disposal of waste. c. Document existing chlorine contact concerns for disinfection practices and provide high level summary of treatment alternatives available. d. Document existing PFAS sampling results and provide high level summary of treatment alternatives available. 7.5 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Provide recent water quality monitoring and assist in identifying any water quality concerns. • Assist with documenting compliance activities. Assumptions • Evaluation of pending regulations and treatment of emerging contaminants will be completed based on recent findings and documentation within the water industry. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 9 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. Deliverables • Draft water quality and treatment write-up. TASK 8: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 8.1 Water System Management Classification, Operators and License. Provide a brief writeup of system required licensing and a summary of current operator staff and license requirements. 8.2 Operations. Document operations and maintenance (O&M) programs currently implemented, and a summary of staffing commitments for each program. 8.3 Benchmarking. Compare reported staffing levels for O&M programs against American Water Works Association (AWWA) benchmarking survey results. Provide recommendation for additional staffing needs based on comparison with AWWA benchmarking. 8.4 Preventative Maintenance Activities. Document existing preventative maintenance activities and, if appropriate, recommend additional activities not currently practiced by City staff. 8.5 Summarize Previous Energy Evaluations. Document findings from previous energy evaluations of Meridian's water system, including a summary of gallon/kilowatt-hour for the City's water sources. 8.6 Future Operations. Document anticipated future O&M activities due as a result of new or potential regulatory requirements for implementation of new facilities identified in the capital improvement plan and for new programs (i.e. lead and copper compliance). 8.7 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Provide summary of O&M activities and committed staffing levels. • Provide AWWA benchmarking results from most recent reporting year. • Assist with quantifying staffing level required for new programs and summarizing existing preventative maintenance activities. Deliverables • Draft O&M write-up. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 10 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. TASK 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ENGINEER Responsibilities 9.1 Capital Improvement Plan. Summarize recommended improvements to address existing and future concerns or deficiencies and associated costs. Prepare individual project sheets with planning level cost estimates for recommended projects. Use a unique project identifier that is included in the master plan graphic to show the location of these improvements. Costs for future transmission pipelines that do not address existing or future deficiencies and are only needed to serve growth will not be included in the capital improvement plan; these pipe alignments will be indicated on the master plan figure as future development driven pipelines. 9.2 Preliminary Project Schedule. Summarize costs for 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year needs. Update the CITY's existing 10-year CIP with recommendations from this study and include planned project cost each year in 2024 dollars. 9.3 Annual Facility Replacement Budgets. Develop recommended annual replacement budgets for existing infrastructure based on typical replacement values and asset life utilizing the existing asset inventory provided by the CITY. Check general comprehensiveness of asset inventory to see if additional major replacement items should be added to the list. Develop replacement budget with input from the CITY on existing condition and age of the facilities. 9.4 Draft Plan Section. Prepare draft section writeup. Final document to have CITY's comments incorporated. CITY Responsibilities • Provide input on the prosed projects. • Provide review and comments on the plan. Assumptions • ENGINEER's opinions of probable cost represent ENGINEER's judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional. Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the CITY's and other contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by the ENGINEER. Deliverables • Draft capital improvement and annual replacement write-up. TASK 10: WATER CONSERVATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING 10.1 Risk and Resilience Assessment and Emergency Response Plan. Review the CITY's existing Risk and Resilience Assessment (RRA) and Emergency Response Plan (ERP) and make recommendations or minor modifications based on the updated water master plan. Include a summary of recommended changes to the RRA and ERP. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 11 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. 10.2 Source Water Protection Plan. CITY will update the Source Water Protection plan with assistance from the Idaho Rural Water Association. ENGINEER will provide a summary write up of the updated plan in the water master plan update. 10.3 Water Supply and Water Conservation Plans. Review the CITY's existing Water Supply and Water Conservation Plans and make recommendations or minor modifications based on the updated water master plan. ENGINEER will provide updated planning criteria and water usage data for incorporation into plans. ENGINEER will review with the City the curtailment action items and triggers and make recommendations for potential updates. Include a summary of updates in the water master plan update. CITY Responsibilities • Provide editable word documents and spreadsheets for previous plans that the City would like assistance in updating. • Update Source Water Protection Plan and provide updated copy. • Lead public involvement and coordinate review/comment periods for the Water Conservation Plan. Deliverables • Updated Risk and Resilience Assessment, Emergency Response Plan, and Water Conservation Plans. Draft and final version. • Summary write-up for inclusion in the water master plan update. TASK 11 : FACILITY PLAN DOCUMENTATION & PUBLIC MEETING ENGINEER Responsibilities 11 .1 Final Draft Report. Prepare and combine draft documents for a facility plan. Add executive summary and assemble appendix materials. Draft documents to be updated to address CITY comments. Submit final draft report for CITY review. Address final CITY and public comments and submit for Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEA) review. 11 .2 Public Meeting. Prepare materials for and present summary findings to City Council. 11 .3 Address Agency Comments. Address comments from IDEQ and prepare final deliverables. 11 .4 Model Training. Provide up to eight (8) hours of support in transferring the model and assisting City staff in familiarizing and utilizing the model. CITY Responsibilities • Review and comment on final draft plan in a timely manner. • Participate and provide facilities for public meeting. Provide public notice as required and assist in addressing public comments. Deliverables • Public meeting presentation materials. TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 12 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. • Three (3) paper copies of the plan and one electronic copy in PDF format. • Water model electronic copy. TASK 12: ADDITIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER Responsibilities 12.1 Additional Services. Work to complete other task may uncover requirements for additional services. For these instances, a time and material budget is established in order for ENGINEER to complete the additional services. Prior to the use of this budget, CITY's representative will provide written (email) authorization to perform particular tasks. Potential services may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Funding administration support. b. Energy field evaluations. c. Facility conditions assessments. d. Transient analysis and modeling evaluations. e. Public / stakeholder outreach. f. System evaluations for ongoing development activities. TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE Compensation per task is an estimate, however the Not-To-Exceed total may not be COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Task Description Due Date Compensation 1 Task 1 -Project Management ■ Ongoing Throughout Project $40,485 2 Task 2—Data Acquisition&Facility Tours ■ 90 days from NTP $27,955 3 Task 3—Existing Water System 0 $13,805 4 Task 4—Project Planning and Demand Analysis 0 $32,435 5 Task 5—Water Supply and Storage 0 $27,020 6 Task 6—Water Distribution System m $112,470 7 Water Quality and Treatment 0 $24,160 8 Operations and Maintenance 0 $22,375 9 Capital Improvement Plan 0 $33,395 10 Water Conservation and Emergency Response 0 $15,310 Planning 11 Facility Plan Documentation and Public Meeting $20,340 12 Additional Services $15,000 TASK ORDER TOTAL: $348,750.00 Compensation per task is an estimate. The Not-To-Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is three hundred forty-eight thousand, seven hundred fifty dollars and 00/100 ($348,750.00). No compensation will be paid over the Not-to-Exceed amount without prior written approval by the Owner in the form of a Change Order. No travel TASK ORDER 11367—Water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 13 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. or expenses will be reimbursed through this agreement. All costs must be incorporated in the individual tasks within the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC BY: On File BY: KEITH WATTS, Purchasing Manager JAMES B% DOE, VE., Principal Dated: 2-7-2023 Dated: 1/23/2023 Approved by City Council: 2-7-2023 City Project Manager: Tyson Glock TASK ORDER 11367—water Master Plan Update 2023 Page 14 of 14 Keller&Associates, Inc. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Task Order 11281.d and Purchase Order No. 23-0199 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Tertiary Filter VE & Revised Preliminary Design project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$268,809 C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 2/7/2023 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: N/A Topic: Approval of Task Order 11281.d and Purchase Order No. 23-0199 to Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the WRRF Tertiary Filter VE & Revised Preliminary Design project for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $268,809. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Task Order #11281.d and Purchase Order 23-0199. Background: Mayor Robert E. Simison Wil I DIAN� City Counc Members Joe Berton John Overton Public Works Luke Cavener Brad Hoaglun Department Jessica Perreault Liz Strader TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison Members of the City Council FROM: David Briggs, P.E., P.M.P. DATE: January 11, 2023 SUBJECT: TASK ORDER#11281.1) FOR THE WRRF TERTIARY FILTRATION UPGRADE —VE REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN WITH STANTEC FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $268,809.00 PURSUANT TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 01, 2020 REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve Task Order#11281.D with Stantec for the WRRF Tertiary Filtration Upgrade — VE Revised Preliminary Design, for a not-to exceed cost of $268,809.00. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS David Briggs, PE, PMP -PM 208-489-0347 Clint Dolsby PE, Assistant City Engineer 208-489-0341 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208-489-0350 Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208-985-1259 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background The WRRF Tertiary Filtration Facilities Project is designed to reduce the effluent phosphorus loadings to Five Mile Creek through installation of a tertiary Page 1 of'4 membrane system. The WRRF is currently in year six of a ten-year NPDES compliance schedule to reduce these loadings. As part of a previous Task Order (TO1), Stantec progressed the tertiary filtration concept presented in the City's 2018 Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Plan (WRRF) and submitted a Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)to the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). After Task Order TO was complete, the City indicated that the estimated capital cost of the project exceeded the budget amount that the City had dedicated for the tertiary facilities. Stantec volunteered to identify value engineering (VE) ideas that may reduce or defer capital costs, thus allowing the City to stay within, or as close to, the City's budget as practical. B. Proposed Project This project will validate the VE recommendations and confirm the findings and decisions with the City. Stantec will provide engineering services to make modifications to the preliminary design and likely reduce or defer capital cost by several million dollars. Stantec will then incorporate the changes and update and re-baseline the overall cost opinion. C. Consultant Selection Stantec was selected for this project due to their expertise in the design and analysis of wastewater treatment plants and their work on similar projects consisting of the same tertiary filtration technology that we are looking to utilize. IV. IMPACT A. StrategicImpact: This project meets our mission requirements to identify and prioritize work to anticipate, plan and provide public services and facilities that support the needs of our growing community, ensure modern, reliable facilities, while maintaining financial stewardship and maintaining the ability to meet the changing permit limit requirements. B. Service/Delivery Impact: Implementing tertiary filtration at the WRRF will support departmental objectives to develop and employ strategies that comply with current and pending National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit(NPDES). C. Fiscal Impact: Project Costs: r Fiscal Year 2022 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------- Tertiary Filtration �--------------------------------------------- , $797,946.00 Preliminary Design (TO1) `--------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Page 2 of'4 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Survey Work $15,000.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: WRRF Membrane Pre- $218,105.001 I Procurement--(- -T02) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 1 $1,031,051.001 r-----------------------------------------------------------------------------T---------------------------------------------------------------r----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal Year 2023 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WRRF Tertiary Filtration Total $268,809.00 Upgrade—VE Revised Preliminary Design -- - - - - -- - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Project Cost $1,299,860.00 r------------------------------------------------------------------------------r---------------------------------------------------------------I I-------------------------------------------------------------------1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- r------------------------------------------------------------------------------r---------------------------------------------------------------I I-------------------------------------------------------------------1. L------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Funding F----------------------------------------------------------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2022 Tertiary Filter (3590/96154) $1,500,000 1 Expansion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 2023 Tertiary Filter (3590/96154) $3,000,000 Expansion r----------------------------------------------------------------------r-----------------------------------------------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 2024 Tertiary Filter (3590/96154) $13,000,000 Expansion r------------------------------(proposed)----------------------------------------r------------------------------- --------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2025 Tertiary Filter (3590/96154) $14,000,000 Expansion (proposed) r----------------------------------------------------------------------r-----------------------------------------------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2033 Tertiary Filter (3590/96154) $1,500,000 Expansion (proposed) r----------------------------------------------------------------------r-----------------------------------------------------------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- r----------------------------------------------------------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Funding $33,000,000.00 1 L----------------------------------------------------------------------L--------------------------------- V. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives to this project at this time. V1. TIME CONSTRAINTS Page 3 qf'4 Council's approval will allow this project to continue towards completing design and construction of the tertiary filtration facilities and meet the NPDES compliance date of June 30, 2027. VII. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Approved for Council Agenda: Page 4 of'4 TASK ORDER NO. 11281.D Pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. (ENGINEER) This Task Order is made this 7t" day of February, 2023 and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and accepted by STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Engineer" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and conditions contained in the Master Agreement (Category 2a) between the above-mentioned parties dated October 1 , 2020. The Project Name for this Task Order is as follows: WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION & REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Engineer's scope of services, time of completion and compensation shall be as set forth herein. This Task Order details ongoing design efforts for the City of Meridian's (City's) Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Tertiary Filtration Facilities Project (Project). This TO will validate the recommendations of value engineering (VE) efforts previously conducted to reduce Project capital costs. Once VE recommendations have been confirmed and evaluated in accordance with this Task Order, Stantec will revise the preliminary drawings, Preliminary Engineering Report, and the cost estimate that were previously developed as part of TO 11281 . For visual purposes, a decision flowchart (shown below) was developed to convey the work being fed into, and the deliverables of this Task Order. Efforts preceding TO 11281 .D were either completed or in progress as contracted as part of TO 11281 and TO 11281 .13. TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 1 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. -- ------- — — ----- ------------- ------ --------------- - ----- �� N , [VMVV110X FVALLUwdI wIpER � I'flv[q„xys I I7 In[wl I j xeuwo¢w T n.w.nRi I � .o ro�wK.olm n I I I ITASRORD HMNOPE________________________________.__ — J SCOPE OF WORK Task 1 : VE Validation and Revised Preliminary Design 1.1 Project Management and Coordination The project management and coordination task for this TO 11281 .D is generally assumed to cover the duration of this TO only and will be merely a supplement to the ongoing TO 11281 .13 effort. This task will include: 1.1.1 Internal Team Coordination Stantec will meet with design team leads on a bi-weekly basis to coordinate discipline status, identify risks, and provide a forum for issues or questions that need to be communicated or coordinated with the City or that need further attention within the design team. 1.1.2 Progress Tracking and Reporting Only minimal additional effort needed. Assumptions- • Additional progress reporting meetings and notes are not needed and are as scoped in TO 11 281 .B. • Change logs and other documentation requested by the City will be kept and maintained on a Stantec Microsoft Teams SharePoint site. The SharePoint site will be available for the City and Stantec staff and be used for shared and transfer documents. TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 2 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 1.2 Validation of Preferred VE Alternatives The services to validate the City's preferred VE alternatives are as identified below. 1.2.1 Filtration Capacity Phasing Evaluation A phasing analysis of future filtration capacity will be conducted and will examine WRRF projected flows between 2023 and 2040. This activity is intended to determine how much capacity can be deferred by the City as a cost savings measure. Stantec will look at a range of flow scenarios. These scenarios will be bounded by flow projections from the 2018 Facility Plan (lower flow boundary) and flow projections based on a sustained annual growth in flow of 4.7 percent (upper flow boundary). The annual flow growth rate of 4.7 percent is based on observed WRRF flow data between 2016 and 2021 . Based on the projected flows, Stantec will assess required membrane system capacity. Stantec will consider the design implications of constructing a membrane system that does not meet 2040 design flow conditions, and the triggers for future membrane system upgrade(s) that would be required to increase membrane system capacity in later years. Stantec will look at these improvements both with and without equalization to optimize system sizing on a cost basis for this current Project. Finally, Stantec will look at permit risks that are related to membrane system capacity. This risk analysis will be limited to the City's potential to exceed the NPDES phosphorus limits. Inputs for determining risk will include the assumed annual rate of WRRF flow growth, sizing of the membrane system, timing of future membrane capacity expansion, and the sizing of the equalization tank to mitigate peak flow events. Outcomes and recommendations from the evaluation will be presented by Stantec to the City at a workshop. At this workshop, Stantec will outline methodology, capacity phasing model inputs, and the permit-related risks associated with the variability of these inputs. It is assumed that the City will decide the annual growth rate for future WRRF flow and confirm if equalization will be excluded or deferred from the initial design. Stantec will document the decisions in meeting minutes with presentation information included as attachments. The evaluation will be summarized in a draft technical memorandum (TM), which Stantec will finalize after City review. 1.2.2 Reuse Pump Station Evaluation During the VE effort, an alternative was proposed to repurpose the existing reuse facilities (existing reuse tanks and pump station). Existing reuse tanks could be used for equalization during peak flows, and the existing reuse pump station could be used to convey secondary flows to the new tertiary filtration system and feed the equalization tanks if and when constructed. This Task 1 .2.2 will include a condition assessment and evaluation of the existing reuse pump station, with a feasibility analysis and retrofit cost estimate and comparison to the existing pump station layout and cost should the retrofit be deemed feasible. The evaluation effort for the existing reuse tanks is included as Task 1 .2.3. TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 3 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. The pump station condition assessment will include review of record drawings, interview of operators, site inspections/observations of existing structures, and review of existing equipment to determine general remaining useful life expectations. It is assumed that the review of existing structures will take a maximum of one-half day with two Stantec staff conducting the onsite evaluation. The condition assessment will not include an invasive structural inspection. If the existing reuse pump station retrofit is deemed infeasible or is not lower in capital costs in comparison to a new pump station, Stantec will evaluate and prepare cost estimates for up to two siting locations for the new pump station. The siting locations will either be adjacent to the new Tertiary Filtration Membrane Building (Membrane Building) or adjacent to future equalization tanks. Stantec will also prepare life cycle considerations for the City to reference when making these decisions for either new or repurposed pump station selection. The evaluation will be summarized in a draft TM along with a review meeting prior to TM finalization; decisions from the review meeting will be documented in the meeting notes. It is assumed that this meeting will be combined with the Task 1.2.3 review meeting. 1.2.3 Reuse Tank Equalization Evaluation The preliminary design documents delivered to the City in Fall 2022 include a below- grade concrete equalization tank located under the new Membrane Building. The purpose of the equalization tank is to shave peak secondary effluent flows to the tertiary filtration system, thereby reducing required membrane capacity. The City has decided to decouple the equalization tank from the new Membrane Building and potentially defer any equalization to a future project. If the reuse pump station evaluation (Task 1.2.2) determines the reuse pump station will not be retrofitted, it is assumed that the existing reuse steel tanks will not be used for equalization and new tanks will be needed in the future. This task will then focus on siting new tanks. If the existing reuse pump station can be repurposed to feed the new membrane tertiary filtration system, this evaluation will consider either repurposing the existing 500,000-gallon reuse storage tanks or providing greenfield above-grade storage tanks for equalization. As part of any consideration to use the reuse storage tanks, Stantec will conduct site work to observe tank conditions. It is assumed that Stantec's site assessment will include visual observations of the tank's exterior and interior components only, and the condition assessment will require two Stantec staff. It is also assumed that the City will fully drain the tanks to allow Stantec staff to perform inspection activities. For the remainder of the evaluation, Stantec will combine field data with the following: City-provided record drawings, other historical tank operation and maintenance records, and City staff interview information about the tanks. If more data or investigation activities are required to determine tank integrity, this will be completed under a separate future contract. For all scenarios, Stantec will evaluate the financial costs and benefits of providing equalization as part of this Project or deferring to a later (future) project. Alternatives will be evaluated in terms of both Class 5 capital cost along with general life cycle cost expectations. Stantec will couple the cost analysis efforts with an evaluation of the technical advantages and disadvantages of each option. Stantec will also consider TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 4 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. varying capacities and build upon the recommendations presented in the capacity phasing evaluation (Task 1 .2.1). A recommendation for the preferred equalization alternative will be provided to the City and summarized in a draft TM. A review meeting will be held as part of the decision-making process and held prior to TM finalization. It is assumed that this meeting will be combined with the Task 1 .2.2 review meeting. 1.2.4 Coagulant Storage Relocation Evaluation Stantec will evaluate the option to repurpose the existing Tertiary Filter Building No. 4 for coagulant storage in lieu of Chem. Building No. 3. This evaluation will consider retrofit potential, chemical system space requirements, construction staging, chemical code requirements, demolition, and future operations and maintenance along with a Class 5 cost estimate for comparison to two other alternatives (expansion of the existing Dewatering Facility or construction of a new Chemical Building No. 3) as presented in the design drawings in the existing preliminary design. The evaluation will be summarized in a draft TM. Prior to TM finalization, Stantec will hold a review meeting with the City where the City will select the preferred alternative for chemical coagulant storage. It is assumed that the review will be part of the pump station and equalization review meeting. 1.2.5 Validation of Other VE Recommendations The VE analysis identified other recommendations that will reduce capital costs for the Project. The following revisions will be confirmed and incorporated into the final design: • Transformer Relocation • Use of Pre-engineered Metal Buildings (PEMBs); for this confirmation, Stantec will validate cost by acquiring PEMB cost estimates from qualified vendors. The confirmation of these cost savings alternatives will be summarized in a draft TM. A review meeting will be held as part of the decision making and prior to TM finalization. It is assumed that the review will be part of the pump station and equalization review meeting. 1.3 Revised Preliminary Design Stantec will take the City's decisions from the VE validation effort and update the preliminary design drawings to a level that is sufficient for an updated submittal to Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and so that the OPCC can be revised. The assumed changes to the design include: • Eliminate concrete equalization tank below the Membrane Building with considerations for future equalization connection (retrofitted reuse tanks or new above-grade tanks); it is assumed that equalization will be deferred and not included in this Project. • Update the design of the Membrane Feed Pump Station (dimensions of wet well, number of pumps, etc.). For design effort, it is assumed that the Membrane Feed Pump Station will be a part of the Membrane Building as shown in the preliminary design documents. TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 5 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. • Reduce thickness of the Membrane Building concrete floor from the elimination of the subsurface equalization tank. • Revise Membrane Building to be a pre-engineered metal building. • Resize the Membrane Building to adjust for below grade piping, electrical conduit routing, and other building adjustments associated with VE efforts and outcomes of this Task Order. • Eliminate Chemical Building No. 3. • Retrofit the Tertiary Filter No. 4 building for coagulant storage (including demolition of existing AquaDiamond cloth media filters and addition of chemical storage and feed system). Revised Preliminary Design Assumptions: • All drawings impacted by the revised preliminary design will be updated. • Draft revised drawings will be prepared and submitted to the City for review. • A meeting will be held with the City to review the revised drawings prior to moving forward with final design drawings. 1.4 Update OPCC Stantec will take the updated preliminary design drawings and revise the Class 3 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) that was developed as part of the Preliminary Design effort. This update to the OPCC will be based on the revised drawings developed during Task 1 .3. 1.5 Update PER and DEQ Coordination Upon completion and confirmation of the VE alternatives and associated design changes, Stantec will meet with the DEQ to determine procedures for amending the Preliminary Engineer Report (PER) that was developed by Engineer previously and has been previously approved by DEQ. It is assumed that this PER revision is not a comprehensive revision, but rather a standalone amendment to the original PER. The amendment will identify what design criteria have changed and how these changes impact the phasing of the tertiary filter improvements. The amendment will be submitted with revised preliminary drawings to confirm continued DEQ approval. ASSUMPTIONS • Project management tasks will generally be covered through TO 11281 .13 services with only minor PM effort needed as part of TO 11281 .D. • This work will be performed in parallel to the tertiary filter pre-purchase effort • These efforts will precede Final Design. • Flow projections by others from past planning efforts will be used for this evaluation; Stantec will not validate these projections. The tertiary filtration sizing, capacity TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 6 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. analysis, and the anticipated dates where projected flows necessitate future expansion are best estimates only. Stantec will base evaluation efforts on provided data, the 2018 Facility Plan, and future flow estimates. The City will make the ultimate decision on filtration expansion phasing and the level of risk the City is willing to accept to achieve short-term capital cost reductions. • The evaluation efforts of this Task Order will address deferrals and design changes from Engineers previous work that may reduce WRRF capacity. The validity of these evaluations relies heavily on construction scheduling and City growth rates. This is an element of risk for items that are largely outside the control of both the City and Engineer. • Engineer and the City will prepare and negotiate the Final Design task order prior to the revised preliminary design (Task 1 .3) being complete to keep the design progressing. This will allow for Final Design to be complete to allow contractor bidding in late 2023. TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Task Description Due Date (estimated) Compensation 1.1 Project Management and • May 9, 2023 Coordination $10,017 1.2 Validation of Preferred VE ■ May 9, 2023 Alternatives $108,107 1.3 Revised Preliminary Design ■ April 25, 2023 $127,486 1.4 Update OPCC • May 9, 2023 $13,523 1.5 Update PER and DEQ Coordination ■ March 14, 2023 $9,676 TASK ORDER TOTAL: $268,809.00 The Not-To-Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is Two Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand, Eight Hundred Nine Dollars ($268,809). No compensation will be paid over the Not-to-Exceed amount without prior written approval by the Owner in the form of a Change Order. No travel or expenses will be reimbursed through this agreement. All costs must be incorporated in the individual tasks within the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Nick Smith Digitally signed by Nick Smith BY: On File BY: Date:2023.01.1910:21:08-0700' KEITH WATTS, Purchasing Manager NICK SMITH, P.E., Principal Project Manager Dated: 2-7-2023 Dated: 1/19/2023 Approved by Council: 2-7-2023 City Project Manager: David Briggs TASK ORDER 11281.D—WRRF TERTIARY FILTER VE VALIDATION& REVISED PRELIMINARY DESIGN Page 7 of 7 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (:�4`WEDIANI."_*�Nio) Purchase Order 2/7/2023 23-0199 Attention: David Briggs CITY OF MERIDIAN Billing Attn: Finance 33 Ave 33 EAST BROADWAY AVE. Meridian, IDa Address: 83642 MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208) 888-4433 Shipping 33 E Broadway Ave. Vendor Address: Address: Ste. 200 Meridian, ID 83642 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. 13980 COLLECTIONS CENTER DRIVE CHICAGO, IL 60693 Shipping Method: Contractor FOB: Destination Pre-Paid Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total 23-0199 TO 11281.d WRRF Tertiary Filter VE & Prelim. Design Dollar 268809.00 1.00 268,809.00 Purchase Order Total: $268,809.00 Purchasing Manager: Special Instructions Task Order 10281.d WRRF Tertiary Filter VE & Revised Preliminary Design approved by Council 2/7/2023. Not-To-Exceed $268,809 60-3590-96154-11281.d Ticket#87112 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Professional Services Agreement between Eventageous Idaho, LLC and the City of Meridian for 2023 Meridian Main Street Market Event Coordination Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR EVENT COORDINATION SERVICES: 2023 MERIDIAN MAIN STREET MARKET This PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR EVENT COORDINATION, S_F,RVICES: 2023 MERIDIAN MAIN STREET MARKET ("Agreement") is made this 7th -day of February -, 2023 ("Effective Date"),by and between the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation Or anized under the laws of the State of Idaho, ("City") and Eventageous Idaho, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Promoter"). WHEREAS,City and Promoter seek to present a weekly farmers' market in downtown Meridian, to be promoted as the Meridian Main Street Market("Market"), in order to advance the parties' mutual interests in enhancing the Meridian community's quality of life; enriching the character of downtown Meridian; promoting healthy eating and locally grown produce; and providing opportunities for community members to produce and sell fruits, vegetables, and other agricultural or hand-crafted products; NOW,THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. Market event planning and presentation.Promoter shall plan and present the Market each Saturday from April 15, 2023 through October 14, 2023,in accordance with the specifications set forth herein. Promoter shall be responsible for all contractual arrangements and obligations, financial or otherwise,related to the Market and/or the services provided hereunder, and shall plan for all logistics and provide all features of the Market,which shall include,but need not be limited to: market vendors, educational displays, musical performers or music deejay, sound system, food trucks and/or food and beverage vendors, event security, crowd management, traffic control, first aid stations, and signs. B. Market specifications.The Market shall comply in all respects with each and all of the following specifications. 1. The Market shall be presented in and around Meridian City Hall Plaza, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, in Meridian, Idaho, on all Saturdays between April 15, 2023 and October 14,2023. 2. The Market shall include at least twenty-five (25) vendors per week, selling a variety of products grown, made, or otherwise produced by such vendors,including,for example, fruit, vegetables, herbs,baked goods, and crafts. Promoter may charge vendors a registration fee to participate in the Market, at Promoter's discretion. 3. In addition to vendors, the Market may feature: a. Educational displays regarding gardening or agriculture, for example, composting, soil preparation, etc.; b. Cooking or food demonstrations; c. Community Garden representatives offering youth the opportunity to sign up for garden plots; PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE l d. Food trucks; and e. Music, live performance or deejay. 4. The Market and all components thereof shall comply in all respects with all conditions of the applicable City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit, other applicable permits and permitting requirements, Meridian City Code, and state and federal law. 5. All music played at the Market, whether live performance or recorded, shall contain such material, and shall be performed or played in such a manner, as shall be appropriate for all ages, values, and sensibilities. Music shall not include language, attire, and/or behavior that is profane, sexual, violent, or discriminatory in nature. 6. Promoter, or Promoter's employee or agent, shall be on site at the Market from set-up through tear-down each week, to supervise and to ensure that use of City facilities, amenities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation is appropriate and reasonable. 7. The Market shall be open to the public at no cost; Promoter may not collect admission fees for the Market or any component thereof. 8. Promoter shall be responsible for obtaining, at Promoter's sole expense, or requiring vendors to obtain, at their expense, all necessary permits for the Market as required by any agency other than the City of Meridian or the Ada County Highway District, except that if Promoter chooses to allow alcohol sales at the Market, each alcohol seller must obtain a Liquor Catering Permit through the Meridian City Clerk's Office. Other necessary permits may include, but shall not be limited to, permits from the Central District Health Department, Idaho State Department of Agriculture, and Idaho Tax Commission. 9. Promoter shall require vendors using City equipment to protect such equipment from damage as much as practicable, including a requirement that vendors using City tables cover them with tablecloths. C. Insurance. Promoter shall obtain, and shall maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, insurance as set forth below. Proof of such insurance shall be provided to City by 5:00 p.m. on April 7, 2023, evidenced by a certificate of insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Idaho and containing a thirty-day notice of cancellation endorsement. In the event of cancellation or restriction by the insurance company of the insurance policy, Promoter shall notify City in writing within three (3)business days. City has the right to suspend portions of this Agreement in the City's sole discretion if Promoter's insurance is revoked, cancelled, expires or Promoter is otherwise without insurance coverage as set forth below. Promoter shall maintain the following insurance coverage: 1. Comprehensive general liability insurance with a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)per occurrence for property damage and bodily injury or death, naming the City of Meridian as an additional insured. In the event a unilateral cancellation or restriction by the insurance company of the insurance policy referred to in this paragraph, Promoter shall notify City in writing within three (3) business days. City has the right to suspend portions of this Agreement in the City's sole discretion if Promoter's general liability insurance is revoked, cancelled, expires or Promoter is otherwise without PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 2 general liability insurance. 2. Workers' compensation insurance on any and all persons in Promoter's employ, where and in the minimum amount(s) as required by Idaho law. D. Equipment/event rentals. Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, Promoter shall be responsible for obtaining or renting, at Promoter's sole expense, all necessary or desired equipment for the Market (e.g., sound system, temporary restrooms, hand washing stations, etc.). E. Sponsorship. Promoter may sell sponsorships of Market, and may retain all proceeds collected from such sponsorships. Promoter may not engage any sponsor which promotes or endorses any of the following content: 1. Content that is deemed in violation of any applicable City policy; 2. Profane, obscene, indecent, violent, or pornographic content and/or language; 3. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; 4. Defamatory or personal attacks; 5. Threats to any person or organization; 6. Content that promotes, fosters or perpetuates conduct in violation of any federal, state or local law; 7. Content that encourages or incites illegal activity; 8. Information that may compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems; 9. Content that violates a known legal ownership interest, such as a copyright, of any party; or 10. Any content that contains or perpetuates a message that the City deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. If the City becomes aware that any engaged or potential sponsor of the Market promotes or endorses such content, the City may immediately terminate this Agreement, restrict or remove any content that is deemed in violation of this policy or any applicable law, and/or cancel the sponsored feature. F. Promotion. Promoter shall be responsible for any and all efforts to promote the Market via broadcast,print, and online promotion, and/or local media and event calendars. Promoter may, at Promoter's sole expense, purchase commercial advertising of the Market. Whenever feasible, Promoter shall include the Meridian Main Street Market logo on all print, online, digital, and social media materials. City shall provide to Promoter, upon request, a digital copy of the logo. II. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. City permitting and reservations. City shall, on behalf of Promotor, obtain a City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit for the Market, and shall reserve and make available for the Market Meridian City Hall Plaza and front parking lot. City shall, upon Promoter's request, reserve meeting space at Meridian City Hall for workshops and orientation meetings. B. ACHD permitting and traffic control signage. If applicable, City shall, on behalf of Promoter, obtain an ACHD Special Event Permit for the Market, and shall provide all required traffic control signage. Promoter shall be responsible for compliance with any and all terms of PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 3 the ACHD Special Event Permit, including setting up the traffic control signage before each Market in compliance with the approved ACHD Special Event Permit and for taking down the signage after each Market has concluded. C. Promotion. City shall promote the Market via City communication outlets, including the City newsletter, City website, and Meridian Parks &Recreation Department Activity Guide. D. Canopies and tables; load out. City shall provide for Promoter's use for Market vendors, up to twenty (20) canopies with dimensions of approximately ten feet by ten feet(10' x 10'), twenty (20) sets of canopy weights, and up to twenty (20) eight-foot (8') tables. This equipment will be stored in a locked trailer which the City will deliver to the City Hall Plaza the Friday prior to each Market. City shall provide the code to Promoter to access the trailer. Promoter shall be responsible for setting up and configuring all tables and canopies. E. Meridian Parks & Recreation Department staff. City shall provide extra trash cans and liners before each market. Promoter shall be responsible for reasonable janitorial service and garbage removal during each market. Meridian Parks &Recreation on-call staff will respond, though, to calls for services above and beyond what Promoter can provide themselves. The selection of staff for this purpose shall be in City's sole discretion. F. Primary Source of Contact for City. City shall provide Promoter the name, e-mail address, and telephone number of specific City personnel who shall serve as City's primary contacts between City and Promoter for all day-to-day matters regarding City's and Promoter's responsibilities under this Agreement(hereinafter"City Contact"). City may establish one City Contact for Market event planning and presentation, and another City Contact for Market operations. 111.TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. Public place. Promoter acknowledges that Meridian City Hall and Meridian City Hall Plaza are public places, and that all members of the public shall be invited to attend the Market. The public must have general access to the Plaza at all times, so long as such access does not unduly interfere with the use of the Plaza for the Market. B. Vehicles. Driving or parking vehicles on non-designated driving or parking surfaces shall be prohibited, with the limited exception of vehicles driven short distances on non-designated driving surfaces for the purpose of transporting, loading, or unloading equipment and supplies during set-up or tear-down. Vehicles may not be driven on turf or landscape areas, unless at the direction of Meridian Parks &Recreation Department staff. C. No financial obligation. The parties agree that, other than as specifically set forth herein, City shall have no obligation to contribute personnel or funding to the planning or production of the Market, and shall have no obligations other than those specifically set forth in this Agreement. D. Cancellation. City Contact may, in his or her sole discretion, elect to cancel one or more weekly markets comprising the Market, with no notice to Promoter, where cancellation is in the best interest of City or the public health, safety, or welfare, due to weather, act of God, unforeseen facility closure, or other reason. City shall neither assume nor incur any liability in PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 4 the event of cancellation. For purposes of this agreement, an Act of God shall include, but not be limited to: fire, storm, flooding, disease, pandemic, national or local emergency, natural or human-caused disaster, or any other emergency or hazard under which it is illegal, impractical, or unsafe for the market to proceed as scheduled. E. Term. This Agreement shall become effective as of the Effective Date upon execution by both parties, and shall expire following completion of tear-down on October 14, 2023, unless earlier specified, terminated, or extended in the manner as set forth in this Agreement. F. Time of the essence. Promoter acknowledges that services provided under this Agreement shall be performed in a timely manner. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. G. Notice. Communication between Promoter and the City Contact(s) regarding day-to-day matters shall occur via e-mail or telephone. All other notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, or via e-mail, addressed as follows: City: Promoter: City Clerk CheRee L. Eveland City of Meridian Eventageous Idaho, LLC 33 E. Broadway Avenue 573 W. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian ID 83642 H. City policy applies. Promoter shall comply with all City policies and codes applicable to use of City property and facilities, including, but not limited to, policies of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. I. Photography and recording. City shall be authorized to photograph, record, video tape, reproduce, transmit, or disseminate, in or from Meridian City Hall or Meridian City Hall Plaza, the activities described herein for educational, promotional, and public information purposes. City shall not be responsible for the actions of persons who are not under its employment or control. J. Subcontracting or assignment of obligations. Promoter shall not subcontract or assign any of its obligations or rights under this Agreement related to or that may relate to Promoter's professional event planning expertise. Promoter may subcontract or assign obligations that do not require such expertise, including, but not limited to, such obligations as transport and set-up of equipment. Any subcontractor or assignee shall be bound by all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. K. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, when either or both parties agree that the continuation of the project is not in the parties' best interest, by providing thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. L. Non-waiver of breach. A waiver of any breach or default of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of a breach of the same or any other provision hereof. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 5 M. Indemnification. Promoter shall, and hereby does, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City and any and all of its employees, agents, volunteers, and/or elected officials from any and all losses, claims, and judgments for damages or injury to persons or property, and from any and all losses and expenses caused or incurred by Promoter, its assistants, servants, agents, employees, guests, and/or business invitees, in connection with this Agreement or activities related thereto. Promoter acknowledges that provision of the services described hereunder presents risks, some of which are unknown, and do agree to assume all such known or unknown risks. N. Waiver. Except as to rights held under the terms of this Agreement, Promoter shall, and hereby does, waive any and all claims and recourse against City, including the right of contribution for loss and damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident the performance of this Agreement, whether such loss or damage may be attributable to known or unknown conditions, except for liability arising out of concurrent or sole negligence of City or its officers, agents or employees. O. Relationship of Parties. Promoter is an independent contractor and is not an employee, agent, joint venturer, or partner of City. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Promoter and City or any official, agent, or employee of City. Specifically, without limitation, Promoter understands, acknowledges, and agrees: 1. Except as otherwise set forth herein, Promoter is free from actual and potential control by City in the provision of services under this Agreement. 2. Promoter is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business. 3. Promoter has the authority to hire subordinates. 4. Promoter owns and/or will provide all major items of equipment necessary to perform services under this Agreement. 5. Neither Promoter nor City shall be liable to the other for a peremptory termination of the business relationship described under this Agreement. P. Compliance with law. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Promoter shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including, but not limited to, orders of the Governor, Mayor, or public health authority. Q. Non-Discrimination. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Promoter shall not discriminate against any person as to race, creed, religion, sex, age, national origin, sexual orientation or any physical, mental, or sensory handicap. R. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements, promises, or inducements made by either party, or agents of either party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both parties hereto. S. Costs and attorneys' fees. If either party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 6 prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. T. Agreement governed by Idaho law. The laws of the State of Idaho shall govern the validity, interpretation,performance and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue shall be in the courts of Ada County, Idaho. U. Cumulative rights and remedies. All rights and remedies herein enumerated shall be cumulative and none shall exclude any other right or remedy allowed by law. Likewise, the exercise of any remedy provided for herein or allowed by law shall not be to the exclusion of any other remedy. V. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. W. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. EVENTAGEOUS IDAHO,LLC: q��/-- &,,,& CheRee L.Eveland Owner CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: Attest: Robert E. Simison,Mayor 2-7-2023 Chris Johnson,City Clerk 2-7-2023 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-EVENT COORDINATION,MAIN STREET MARKET PAGE 7 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of KorTerra Locate Management Plus, Risk Management & Productivity Management Agreement for Line Locating Services to KorTerra for a Not-To-Exceed amount of$10,100.00 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement Between the Between the City of Meridian and the State of Idaho for Use of Ada County Juvenile Services Juveniles for Community Service by Governmental Agencies AGREEMENT NO. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES This AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the Ada County, a duly formed and existing county pursuant to the laws and constitution of the State of Idaho ("County"), and the following Governmental Agency City of Meridian Parks and Recreation ("Agency"), also referred to as "Party" or"Parties." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Idaho Code §§ 20-511 and 20-520 provide that juveniles under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Juvenile Corrections Act may be ordered by the court to perform community service ("Juveniles"); and WHEREAS, County, through Ada County Juvenile Services ("ACJS") desires to place Juveniles with organizations who are capable and willing to allow said Juveniles to perform community service as ordered by the court, and WHEREAS,Agency is an organization that is willing and capable of accepting Juveniles to perform community service duties, which is a constructive means of working towards the betterment,welfare and/or beautification of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: General Agency Information: Agency Name: City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Agency Address: 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, IT 83642 Agency Email Address: morbergkmeridiancity.org Agency Telephone No.: 208-888-3579 Agency Point of Contact: Roger Norberg Point of Contact Cell: Agency Emergency Contact Person (if different from POC): Emergency Contact Person Cell Number: AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 1 1. Term and Termination: a. The term of this Agreement shall begin on October 1, 2022 and shall extend through September 30,2023. The County may, solely at its option, and when and if it duly budgets and appropriates funds therefore from revenues legally available to it for the ensuing fiscal year,renew this Agreement for additional annual Renewal Terms. Each annual renewal of this Agreement shall be deemed to be exercised by the County upon the adoption no later than September 15 of any year, a budget for the ensuing fiscal year, duly budgeting and appropriating the amount of money required to operate the community service program. Following the adoption of a budget duly budgeting and appropriating said funds of the ensuing year, County shall deliver to the Agency a written statement certifying that it has duly renewed the Agreement for the ensuing year. Each Renewal Term shall commence on October 1 of the fiscal year following adoption of the budget as provided hereinabove and shall terminate on September 30 of the following calendar year. Additionally, each Party has a right to terminate the Agreement upon no fewer than thirty (30) days' written notice. 2. Agency Responsibilities: During the term of this Agreement,the Agency shall be responsible for the following: a. Coordinating the use of Juveniles with the ACJS staff. Agency should be aware of other persons, whether adults or minors, who may also be performing community service for Agency, who are not under the jurisdiction of ACJS. Such persons should not be assigned to work with Juveniles, absent direct adult supervision. Such adult supervision requires that the Juvenile remain in the supervisor's direct line of sight, at all times. b. Providing ACJS staff with the general scope of services for Agency work and the current capacity of its program for Juveniles. c. Maintaining communication with the designated ACJS liaison on a not less than quarterly basis. d. Providing all training on safety rules, participation regulations and equipment usage to all Juveniles, as necessary, and upon request by the ACJS, providing reasonable documentation that such training has been completed. At a minimum,Agency or the work site must provide the following safety equipment (if applicable to the type of work performed): eye protection, ear protection, face protection, gloves, and all other items reasonably necessary to maintain and comply with safety guidelines. Agency personnel who supervise Juveniles shall be provided with and instructed to read a copy of ACJS Community Service Program Requirements, as provided in Exhibit B, detailing the restrictions and requirements of the program. e. Juveniles may not drive Agency vehicles of any type and may not perform any work tasks involving the direct use of heavy machinery. All Juveniles work must be performed on the AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 2 ground. Juveniles are not permitted to complete any work above ground level,through the use of a ladder or other lifting equipment. f. Performing services within the County of Ada,unless prior authorization is received from the ACJS. g. Immediately contacting the designated ACJS liaison if any Juvenile causes disruption, fails to cooperate, or leaves the work site without permission. h. Immediately reporting all injuries to the ACJS liaison, both verbally and in writing, in a form to be provided to the Agency by ACJS. i. All Juveniles are to remain on location at the Agency, at all times, during their scheduled work,unless given the express prior consent of ACJS to do otherwise. j. Attending regularly scheduled safety briefings hosted by the ACJS and/or Ada County Risk Management, as well as attending annual Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) training, hosted by the ACJS. k. Accurately recording and tracking the hours served by the Juvenile on the ACJS-issued timesheet. The Agency shall ensure that the Juvenile is signed in and out by a designated employee each time they report to serve hours. 1. Providing a safe work environment in accordance with applicable laws that is free from harassment, criminal activity, discrimination, etc. m. Creating and maintaining a formal,written complaint process for Juveniles. Agency shall submit any such written complaints to the designated ACJS liaison within one(1)business day. n. Ensuring that Agency personnel have no personal relationships with Juveniles. In the event any Agency becomes aware that Agency personnel has a personal relationship with a Juvenile, in any capacity other than as a supervisor, Agency shall immediately notify the designated ACJS liaison of the nature of the relationship, so that the appropriate steps can be taken. 3. County Responsibilities: During the term of this Agreement,the County shall be responsible for the following: a. As available, providing Juveniles to Agency on an as needed basis. Juveniles assigned to the Agency will be screened according to the Agency's inclusion and exclusion criteria and capable of performing basic manual labor activities. b. Providing transportation for Juveniles, to and from Agency. c. Providing food and beverages for Juveniles, as needed. d. Providing supervision of Juvenile on-site, as needed or recommended by Agency. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 3 e. Providing policy and security information to the Agency personnel who work with the Juveniles, as needed. f. Providing workers' compensation insurance for each Juvenile. g. Responding on-site, as requested by the Agency to address Juvenile issues, handle uncooperative Juveniles or otherwise assist the Agency with controlling and managing Juveniles. 4. Other Terms and Conditions: a. Workers' compensation premiums are based on experience ratings.In an effort to minimize expense related to workers' compensation claims, the Agency and County shall conduct a quarterly review of workers' compensation claims received by the County that are directly related to the Agency's use of Juveniles. If the incurred claims cost attributable to Juveniles assigned to the Agency exceed the annual premium of the County (as determined by Ada County Risk Management), the County will advise the Agency of such increase and the Agency will be offered the option to: i. cease use of Juveniles immediately; or ii. pay a fee set by the County to reimburse the County of the increased workers' compensation premiums. b. In an effort to proactively address safety issues, the County and the Agency will conduct, at a minimum, annual reviews for the type of work to be performed by Juveniles while working for the Agency. This review is designed to assess risk, safety concerns, and to review the Agency's lost prevention efforts. Loss prevention efforts will include, but are not limited to, a review of the following: job site visits, review/inspection of tools and safety gear utilized by Juveniles, review of all safety training and instruction provided by the Agency,claims experience for the Agency,accident reviews for the Agency and review of all documentation of all loss prevention efforts undertaken or extended by the Agency. c. Indemnification (County). To the extent permitted by applicable law, County shall indemnify and hold Agency, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for injuries to persons or property resulting from the wrongful acts of County, its officers, agents or employees in performing the duties described in this Agreement. Such indemnification and defense shall be limited to only those claims, and only to the extent that, County itself could be liable under state and federal statutes, regulations, common law, and other law. County's indemnification and defense of Agency herein is further limited by all defenses, burdens of proof, immunities, and limitations on damages to which County would be entitled if the claims were asserted against County, including but not limited to Title 6, Chapter 9, Idaho Code. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 4 d. Indemnification (Agency). To the extent permitted by applicable law, including Idaho Code § 59-1015, Agency shall indemnify and hold the County, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages,judgments, costs, expenses, and/or injuries to persons or property arising out of or in connection with any activities, acts, or omissions of Agency, its officers, agents or employees. In the event County is alleged to be liable on account of any activities, acts, or omissions of Agency, its officers, agents or employees, then Agency shall reimburse the County for defending such allegations through counsel chosen by County and Agency shall bear all costs, fees, and expenses of such defense,including,but not limited to,all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. Such indemnification and defense reimbursement shall be limited to only those claims, and only to the extent that, Agency itself could be liable under state and federal statutes, regulations, common law, and other law. e. Insurance. Agency agrees to maintain insurance coverage, as set forth in Exhibit A. Self- Insurance by governmental Agencies is permitted, to the extent allowed by law. £ Independent Contractor. Agency is, and shall perform this Agreement as, an independent contractor and, as such, shall have and maintain complete control over all its employees and operations, except as otherwise provided herein. Neither Agency, nor anyone employed by it, shall represent, act,purport to act, or be deemed to be the agent,representative, employee, or servant of County. As an independent contractor, Agency shall be solely responsible for payment of wages, all federal and state withholding taxes, liability insurance, and such compensation insurance and such other obligations as are the legal responsibility of an employer. g. Modification. Except as may otherwise be provided herein,provisions of this Agreement may be modified, amended or waived only by a written document specifically identifying this Agreement and signed by an authorized representative of each Party. h. Waiver. The failure of either Party at any time to require performance by the other of any provision and any waiver by any Party of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any continuing or succeeding breach, a waiver of the provision itself, or a waiver of any right under this Agreement. i. Costs and Fees. If either Party brings any action for any relief against the other, declaratory or otherwise,arising out of this Agreement,use of the Premises,or enforcement of the terms hereof, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover any and all reasonable court costs and attorney's fees. j. Survival. All covenants, conditions, indemnifications and other elements in this Agreement which may involve performance subsequent to any termination or expiration of this Agreement or which cannot be reasonably ascertained or fully-performed until after termination or expiration of this Agreement shall survive. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 5 k. Notices. All notices required to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered immediately if hand-delivered and 48 hours after depositing the same in the U.S. mail,certified or registered,postage prepaid,addressed to the respective addresses set forth below, or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time notify the other in writing. Agency: City of Meridian Parks and Recreation C/O: Roger Norberg 33 E.Broadway Ave. Meridian , ID 83642 Ada County: Board of Ada County Commissioners 200 W. Front St Boise, ID 83702 1. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. in. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and all other agreements,whether oral or written,are hereby superseded and of no force and effect. n. Signor Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of an entity represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said entity in accordance with duly adopted organizational documents or contracts and, if appropriate, a resolution of the entity, and that this Agreement is binding upon said entity in accordance with its terms. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto executed this Agreement to be effective as herein provided. DATED this day of 20_ Board of Ada County Commissioners By: Rod Beck, Commissioner By: Ryan Davidson, Commissioner By: Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk DATED this 7th day of February , 2023 . Agency City of Meridian By: Name: Robert E. Simison Title: Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2-7-2023 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 7 EXHBIT A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS A. The Agency,at its sole expense, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect insurance written by an insurance company or companies with AM Best's rating(s) of A VIII or better. All insurance companies must be authorized to do business in the state of Idaho. By requiring insurance herein, Ada County does not represent that coverage and limits are necessarily adequate to protect the Agency, and such coverage and limits shall not be deemed as a limitation on the Agency's liability under the indemnities granted to Ada County in this contract. B. Certificates of Insurance evidencing the coverages required herein shall be provided to Ada County prior to the start date of the project.All certificates must be signed by an authorized representative of the Agency's Insurance carrier and must state that the issuing company, its agents, or representatives will provide Ada County thirty(30) days written notice prior to any policies being canceled or materially changed. Renewal certificates or binders must be provided to Ada County a minimum of five (5) days prior to the effective date of the renewal. If binders are used, they must be replaced by appropriate insurance certificates no more than thirty (30) days after the effective date. C. Certificates shall be mailed/emailed to: Ada County Juvenile Services 6300 W. Denton St Boise, Idaho 83704 Email: abelveal@adacounty.id.gov And to: Ada County Risk Management Email: risk(a),adacoun . .id..ov D. Certificates must evidence the following minimum coverages: 1. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance providing limits of liability in the following amounts: General Aggregate: $2,000,000 Product/Completed Operations Aggregate: $2,000,000 Per Occurrence: $1,000,000 Fire Legal Liability: $ 50,000 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 8 The Commercial General Liability("CGL")insurance policy shall be written on an "Occurrence" form and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products, completed operations, personal injury, advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including tort liability of another assumed in a contract). 2. BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance providing bodily injury and property damage liability coverage for not less than$1,000,000 each accident limit. Business Automobile Liability insurance shall be written on a standard ISO policy form, or an equivalent form, providing coverage for liability arising out of owned, hired, or non-owned vehicles in connection with this agreement. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 9 EXHIBIT B ACJS COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPERVISING PERSONNEL 1. Juveniles must be provided all training on safety rules,participation regulations, and equipment usage, as necessary. At a minimum, the work site must provide the following safety equipment, if applicable to the type of work performed: eye protection, ear protection, face protection, gloves, and any other items reasonably necessary to maintain a safe workplace. 2. Juveniles may not perform tasks with other non-Juveniles, unless under adult supervision, which requires that Juvenile remain in supervisor's line of sight at all times. 3. Juveniles may not drive Agency vehicles of any type. 4. Juveniles are not to perform any tasks involving the direct use of heavy machinery. If you have any questions about machinery that Juveniles can use, discuss with ACJS first. 5. All Juvenile services must be performed on the ground. Juveniles are not permitted to perform any labor above ground level through the use of a ladder or other lift equipment. 6. Immediately contact ACJS if any Juvenile causes disruption, fails to cooperate, or leaves the work site without permission. 7. Immediately report all Juvenile injuries to the ACJS, both verbally and in writing. 8. Juveniles cannot work outside the boundaries of Ada County,unless prior authorization is received from the ACJS. 9. Juveniles are entitled to a safe, non-hostile work environment, in accordance with applicable laws. 10. Juveniles are entitled to file written complaints about the Agency, work assigned, etc. Any such complaint must be submitted to the ACJS within one (1)business day of receipt. 11. Juveniles are not allowed to have personal relationships with Agency personnel. If anyone at the Agency becomes aware of such a personal relationship, they must notify an Agency supervisor, who must notify the ACJS, as soon as possible. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF ADA COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES JUVENILES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES—PAGE 10 w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 23-2370: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Adopting the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan; Authorizing the Parks and Recreation Staff to Implement the Master Plan; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 23-2370 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, OVERTON, PERRAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADOPTING THE CITY OF MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN;AUTHORIZING THE PARKS AND RECREATION STAFF TO IMPLEMENT THE MASTER PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the updated City of Meridian, Idaho Parks and Recreation Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Master Plan"), was prepared following collection of input from City staff, community stakeholders and analysis of inventory, level of service, operations, and finances; WHEREAS, on January 11, 2023, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Master Plan and recommended its approval and adoption by City Council; WHEREAS, City Council finds that the Master Plan establishes the necessary framework for the Parks and Recreation Department to continue providing exceptional parks, recreation, and pathway services by realizing organizational efficiencies, financial opportunities, and programming, service, and amenity enhancements; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian to approve and adopt the Master Plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the updated City of Meridian, Idaho Parks and Recreation Master Plan attached as Exhibit A hereto is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. Section 2. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the provisions of the Master Plan. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 7th day of February, 2023. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 7th day of February, 2023. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN PAGE. I WE ■ QID I N4,,;-� Ak ..+e' �9 1ti .... ��sir"Zf`'17T\!'eY7id:•77!'7. I 2023 Am OP , • TV lit 'Ili I � JI R 1 � � :R. 1•!1 0�• �-' r ♦ '�'•�� .-! ,� 4�•• - 1. ].i �i i�� � I � �� f 1 -� `mot i-. .. f �� � «� s�/c-'�'--'- _ .�.� i1� •� •` `i.lr�� ���,.,` .1\ ��� •.� ��y 0-i �i t 'y �i 11V�� t� - �'� ,r �•,,`i+1 j�� ' — —"`...\\\III, � .F � � �_rI y�``• �, �a. �:—� PLACEHOLDER FOR FUTURE APPROVAL LETTER. Tabte of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................8 A. Purpose of this Plan .........................................................................................8 B. Planning Process Summary..............................................................................9 C. Recommendations .........................................................................................10 2.0 Introduction of the Planning Context....................................................... 19 A. Purpose of this Plan ....................................................................................... 19 B. Parks and Recreation Department Overview............................................... 20 C. Mission, Vision, and Values.......................................................................... 20 D. Related Planning Efforts and Integration......................................................21 E. Methodology of this Planning Process ..........................................................21 3.0 What We Want — Our Community, Trends & Identified Needs........ 23 A. Demographic Profile..................................................................................... 23 B. Current Trends................................................................................................29 C. Community and Stakeholder Input ..............................................................37 D. Random Invitation Community Needs Assessment Survey Summary........ 40 4.0 Who We Are - Organizational & Financial Assessment..................... 44 A. Organizational Analysis .............................................................................. 44 B. Recreation Program Analysis........................................................................ 48 C. Financial Analysis......................................................................................... 49 D. Maintenance and Operations Analysis....................................................... 56 5.0 Pathways Assessment & Recommendations ........................................ 62 A. Introduction................................................................................................... 62 B. Pathway System Overview........................................................................... 63 C. Importance of Pathways/Need................................................................... 64 D. Progress Update/Policies Implemented...................................................... 65 E. Opportunities/Recommendations ............................................................... 66 F. Key Stakeholders for Pathway Implementation............................................ 68 G. Implementation and Maintenance Priorities ............................................... 68 H. Implementation Costs for Plan Build-Out .....................................................70 I. Pathway Maintenance and Operations.........................................................70 6.0 What We Have - Parks & Facilities Inventory Assesment...................73 A. Step 1 : Inventory - What Do We Have?.......................................................73 B. Step 2: Assessment and Analysis - How Are We Doing?............................ 83 7.0 Where We Go From Here — Recommendations & Action Plan.......... 98 A. Recommendations ........................................................................................ 98 B. Goals, Objectives, and Actions.................................................................. 104 C. Implementation Guidelines/Strategies ...................................................... 112 Appendicies ........................................................................................................ 114 Appendix A — GRASP® Glossary .................................................................. 114 Appendix B — General Maintenance Standards for Quality Parks and Facilities inMeridian, Idaho .......................................................................................... 150 .07 19 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN 5` J: { W _ 4 � - �` - UPDATE V List of Figures Figure 1: Projected Population Growth in City of Meridian, 2000 - 2030.......................................25 Figure 2:Age Distribution in Meridian Compared to State of Idaho.................................................26 Figure 3: Race Comparison for Total Population in City of Meridian.................................................26 Figure 4: Educational Attainment in Meridian.....................................................................................27 Figure 5: Median Household Income Distribution, 2021 Estimates ...................................................27 Figure 6:Ada County Health Rankings Overview .............................................................................29 Figure 7:Adult Participation for Fitness Activities................................................................................30 Figure 8:Adult Participation in Outdoor Recreation ..........................................................................30 Figure 9:Adult Participation in Team Sports .......................................................................................31 Figure 10: Non-Traditional Services Desired in Community Center...................................................34 Figure 11: Meridian Parks and Recreation 2022 Organizational Chart............................................47 Figure 12:Actuals FY15 — FY22 ..........................................................................................................50 Figure 13: Selected Idaho Parks and Recreation Expenditures per Capita — 2022/23 ...................51 Figure 14: Resource Allocation Methodology.....................................................................................52 Figure 15: Meridian Residents Opinions Regarding Current Program and Facility Fees...................53 Figure 16: Potential Impact on Participation from Fee Increases .......................................................53 Figure 17: Importance of Facilities and Amenities, Recreation Programs,and Services to Meridian 57 Figure 18: Needs Met for Facilities and Amenities in Meridian .........................................................57 Figure 19:Top Three Community Issues for Suggested Improvement.................................................58 Figure20: Pathways Map................................................................................................................... 79 Figure 21: System Inventory Examples ...............................................................................................74 Figure 22: Example of a GRASP® LOS Perspectives Heat Map........................................................84 Figure 23:Walkability Barriers"Cut-off" Service Areas where Applicable.....................................85 Figure 24:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Provided by Meridian Parks....86 Figure 25:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities by All Providers........................87 Figure26:Walk High-Value Area.......................................................................................................88 Figure 27: GRASP®Walkable Gap Analysis (10 min = '/2 mile Service Area).................................89 Figure 28: Percentage of Population by Service Level........................................................................89 Figure 29: Neighborhood Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Provided by Meridian Parks ...............................................................................................................................................................90 Figure 30:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities by All Providers.........................91 Figure 31: Neighborhood Access High-Value Area ...........................................................................92 Figure 32: Neighborhood Gap Analysis (1 mile service)...................................................................92 Figure 33: Percentage of Population by Service Level........................................................................93 List of Tablies Table 1: Distribution of Meridian Budgeted Staffing...........................................................................46 Table 2: Meridian Parks and Recreation Revenues and Expenses (FY 2015 — FY 2022).................49 Table3: 2023 Park Impact Fees..........................................................................................................53 Table 4:Anticipated Funds from Impact Fees through 2050..............................................................54 Table 5: Capital Improvement Projects................................................................................................68 Table 6: Summary of Developed Parks/Outdoor Locations &their Components............................77 Table7: Indoor Facility Summary........................................................................................................78 Table 8: Park Classification Summary..................................................................................................80 Table 9: Park Scores by Classifications................................................................................................83 Table 10:Target Park Calculation .......................................................................................................88 Table 11: GRASP® Comparative Data............................................................................................... 94 Table 12: Master Plan Comparison..................................................................................................... 95 Table 13: Meridian Capacities ............................................................................................................97 Table 14:Acres of Park Land per 1,000 Residents .............................................................................98 Table 15: Outdoor Park and Recreation Facilities — Median Population Served per Facility...........98 f 1 .0 EXECUTIVE i p- A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN This Parks and Recreation Master is an update of the i 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Development of this updated plan took place from October 2021 to December 2022, and included a community ■ engagement, leadership interviews, a needs assessment survey, inventory and level of service analysis, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis. The Master Plan Update provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of this growing community. 4W EEL- --"dew- 8 City of Meridian, Idaho Executive Summary B. PLANNING PROCESS ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS SUMMARYReview and assessment of relevant plans. This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks Measurement of the current delivery of service for and Recreation project team made up of City City facilities using the GRASP® Level of Service Analysis and allowing for a target level of service staff, with input from the Parks and Recreation to be determined that is both feasible and aligned Commission and the City Council. This team with the desires of citizens as expressed through provided input to the BerryDunn consulting the citizen survey.This analysis is also represented team throughout the planning process.This graphically in GRASP® Perspectives. collaborative effort created a plan that fully utilizes Exploration of finance and funding mechanisms to the consultant's expertise and incorporates the support development and sustainability within the local knowledge and institutional history that only system. community members can provide.The project consisted of the following tasks: NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Consideration of the profile of the community and demographics, including population growth. Review of previous planning efforts,City historical information. Research of trends related to Meridian and American lifestyles to help guide the efforts of Parks and Extensive community involvement effort including Recreation over the next several years. focus groups, meetings with key stakeholders, and a community-wide public meeting. OPERATIONAL ANI MARKETING Interviews with elected officials. Statistically valid community interest and opinion Analyze parks and recreation programming andservice delivery. survey. Conduct an organizational Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats(SWOT)Analysis. FACILITY INVENTORY Develop a broad assessment of the overall parks and Update inventory of parks and facilities using existing recreation operations. mapping, staff interviews, and on-site visits to verify amenities and assess the condition of the facilities and surrounding areas. RECOMMENDATIONS: GOALS, OBJECTIVES, I GRASP* ACTION PLAN LEVEL IF SERVICE ANALYSIS Identification and categorization of recommendations into themes with goals, objectives, and an action plan Interviews with staff to provide information about for implementation. City facilities and services, along with insight Development of an action plan for capital regarding the current practices and experiences of improvements including cost,funding source the City in serving its residents and visitors. potentials, and timeframe to support the Identification of homeowner association (HOA)and implementation of the plan. alternative providers of recreation services to provide insight regarding the market opportunities in the area for potential new facilities and services. OTHER PLAN Analysis addressing recreation, parks, and related Review of current staffing and development of services. recommendation for future growth potential. Review of the Urban Forestry Management strategy. Review current Pathways Plan and develop updated recommendations. Conduct a conceptual study and public engagement for a new community center. Conduct a cost recovery and financial sustainability study. UPDATEPARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN Section 1.0 C. RECOMMENDATIONS After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research,the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes ways to enhance the level of service and the quality of life with improvement through organizational efficiencies,financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, and maintenance and improvements to facilities and amenities. . . - to Improve Organizational Efficiencies Objective 1.1 — Maintain existing level of service goal. The City of Meridian currently has a Level of Service planning goal that is 4 acres of developed park land per 1,000 persons. In 2022,the City is maintaining 3 acres per 1,000 population to keep up with the rapid growth of the City. Meridian should continue with the planning goal of 4 acres, while continuing to maintain the existing 3 acres. Additional ly,the City also has a planning goal of 0.59 square feet of indoor recreation space per 1,000 population.The City should maintain the planning goal for indoor recreation space. Objective 1.2— Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services. The Parks and Recreation Department currently has a Marketing Plan (Communication Plan)that guides the Department's efforts in communicating and promoting its activities, services, and facilities. As part of a larger effort,the City of Meridian has an active communication roundtable that the Department should actively participate with. In addition to the roundtable,the Department should take advantage of training opportunities for new communication methods and branding efforts. The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and potential partners within the community. Objective 1.3— Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. A top priority from the public response is to continue to maintain and make improvements to existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CFP Plan and the Life Cycle Replacement Program. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: • Completing a golf course Master Plan * completed in 2021-2022 • Creating a plan for Tier2 and Tier 3 golf course improvements • Developing the Urban Forestry Management Plan with existing staff* completed in 2021-2022 • Taking the Urban Forestry Management Plan to the Planning Commission and City Council for feedback and acceptance * completed in 2021-2022 • Implementing the park identity and theming plan Executive Summary Objective 1.4- Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. The Department should continue to use a mixed method approach to communicating with the public about programs, services, and opportunities. Mobile marketing is a trend of the future.Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore adding navigation apps for parks and pathways. Teaming with the public app AIITrails would be a good starting point. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies adding Wi-Fi in Phase 2 of the Discovery Park development. Objective 1.5- Increase appropriate partnerships within the community. The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. The City-Wide Strategic Plan recommends establishing a timeline to transfer pool operations from WARD to the City. * Operations were transferred in the summer of 2022. Objective 1.6-Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. As recommended in the Master Plan and based on the Staffing Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and facility upgrades, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current performance standards. The Department should explore opportunities to increase staffing levels as growth continues. This will require new positions both in parks and recreation. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends promoting and growing the current volunteer program. ti t r I �I Section 1.0 Goal #2: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities Objective 2.1 —Maintain and improve existing facilities. The Department should continue to implement existing plans,the CFP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs, and the Master Plan.These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: Renovating the existing on-course restrooms for ADA compliance at Lakeview Golf Course • Replacing old equipment for improved golf course maintenance operations • Upgrading the golf course irrigation system Objective 2.2— Expand pathways and connectivity. The Department should continue to update and implement the existing Pathways Master Plan as development continues. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated,the Department should explore ways to the improve pathway inspections and approval process. To assist with the implementation and oversight of this process,the City should consider the addition of a Parks Operation Crew Chief. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: • Construction of the six identified pathway connections • Implementation of formal pathway standards based on size, route/loop, and incorporate testing and acceptance requirements prior to final approval • Partnering with the Urban Land Institute (ULI)for place-making and amenity design on the Five Mile Creek Pathway • Creating branding and wayfinding tools for priority pathway segments Objective 2.3—Add indoor recreation space. • Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, there is a need for additional indoor recreation space. The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a new community center. Another option would be to explore opportunities to add community centers to newly planned elementary and middle schools or future regional parks. • The City-Wide Strategic Plan recommended conducting a needs assessment and conceptual planning for a new community center. As part of this planning process, a feasibility study was conducted, and conceptual designs were developed.The feasibility study and conceptual Executive Summary Objective 2.4— Develop new amenities at existing parks based on level of service analysis. Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users. As Meridian continues to grow,the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth areas. Also, based on the GRASP®analysis,the Department should look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where the level of service is below threshold. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: • Design of Phase 2 for Discovery Park and bid for development*completed in 2021-2022 • Construct Phase 2 of Discovery Park using CMGC and design • Construct a teen activity area at Discovery Park in Phase 2 Objective 2.5—Acquire new land for parks Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching 4 acres of developed park land per 1,000 population, the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below threshold. Objective 2.6— Improve parking at parks. Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups and in the survey. The Department should continue to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and manage parking at parks with popular amenities, activities, and events. Another consideration would be to explore alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand for large scale events. Objective 2.7—Continue to monitor ADA needs in the community. Parks and Recreation currently has an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identifies needed changes during the self-evaluation process. The Department should continue to monitor new facilities and upgrades for compliance. Objective 2.8— Upgrade comfort, convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities. As the Department is making upgrades to and improving existing facilities, it should explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, and other amenities at existing facilities. Where appropriate, look for opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: Working with the Meridian Arts Commission to finalize a plan for future public art projects • Completing the addition of the Meridian Speedway to the Historic Register • Investigating new locations to add to the Historic Register Section 1.0 Goal #2: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities (continued) Objective 2.9—Create park identity in existing and new parks. As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified,the Department should explore opportunities to add unique features, such as destination playgrounds, public art, signage, unique shelters, natural play areas, and/or climbing elements at new and existing parks. The newly adopted City-Wide Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Phase 2 of Discovery Parks that uniquely blends arts, entertainment, adventure sports, and culture. Objective 2.10—Address current and future needs for athletic fields. As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. Objective 2.11 —Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks. As the Department continues to develop new parks and renovate existing parks, continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. Objective 2.12 — Maintain component-based inventory and level of service standards. The Department should review the component-based inventory from the 2022 Master Plan Update when planning new parks and installing new amenities. The inventory and GIS database should be updated for tracking of new components. Objective 2.13 —Continue to maintain life cycle replacement plan. The Department should continue to monitor and update its life cycle replacement plan annually. Executive Summary Goal #3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery Objective 3.1 —Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community. The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens,teens, people with special needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases, continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens schedules. Continue to explore opportunities to produce, attract, promote, and maintain events in the City. Exploring opportunities to offer new programs in outdo or adventure recreation to teens and active adults. Continue to monitor participation and demand for family-centered recreational programs and adjust to meet the needs of the community. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: • Expanding class and program offerings at the new community center • Expanding summer camps to 3-4 sites to help meet community demand • Attracting a national, qualifying sports tournament • Expanding traditional and non-traditional sports leagues and tournaments • Adapting and expanding community events to meet community needs • Adding a City event to enrich Dairy Days • Providing the Parks Division resources to support Dairy Days - ` 5- � '`r _ y. , — :.- • C. � - S. PARKS AND RECREATION Section 1.0 . . Opportunities Objective 4.1 — Increase special event and activities sponsorships. The Department should continue to secure sponsorships for existing and future events. Objective 4.2— Evaluate developer impact fee ordinance. The Department should continue to monitor impact fees from new developments as growth continues. The ordinance should be reviewed every 3-5 years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally,the Department should review its impact fee revenue annually to align with CFP requests and existing LOS. Objective 4.3— Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities. The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services, and facility improvements. The Department should continue to pursue any and all grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. Working with the City's CDBG Grant Administrator, explore opportunities to use CDBG funds for parks, pathways, and/or recreation facilities. Objective 4.4—Implement a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy. The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery, but it varies based on the different service areas. The Department should implement the recommendations from the Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy study completed during this master planning process. The Department should continue to support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program through increased marketing and awareness of the program to attract more families. Explore feasibility of additional revenue sources for parks and recreation as identified in the "Present and Projected Fiscal Resources" section of the Master Plan. Executive Summary Highlights from the 2023 Master Plan Update In alignment with the Impact Fees Study, new land needed for future park land FUTURE PARK LAND: overthe next 10 years increased to 120.5 acres in orderto maintain the current 3.14 acres/1000 population. INDOOR RECREATION In alignment with the new Impact Fee Study,a new goal for indoor recreation SPACE: space level of service of 0.59 sq.ft. per thousand was added which will require 22,827 sq.ft. over the next 10 years. STRATEGIC PLAN The Master Plan incorporated all of the relevant tactics from the updated City- ALIGNMENT: wide Strategic Plan into the update action plan. PRIORITY INDOOR& Through the statistically valid citizen survey,we've confirmed that the highest OUTDOOR FACILITIES: priority indoor recreation priority is the new community center. The highest priority outdoor recreation priority continues to be new pathways. ADDING NEW Meridian has added the swimming pool and golf course to the master plan COMPONENTS: statistics and analyses. Notable changes in the GRASP Level of Service are generally park and component additions have kept pace with population growth, number of park GRASP ANALYSIS: site grew from 21 to 25,the number of components grew from 207 to 256, and most notable is the percentage of residents with walkable access to a recreation component increased from 50%to 68%. The GIS inventory has been updated to include 4 new facilities and 49 INVENTORY UPDATE: new components that have been built since the previous master plan. Additionally,the inventory identified over 260 additional acres of parkland from Homeowner's Associations and private recreation providers. ADA TRANSITION PLAN: An ADA Transition Plan was noted as a need in the previous master plan. This plan notes that the ADA transition plan has been completed since the last plan. UPDATED GIS DATA: This master plan process will provide updated GIS data for the component- based inventory for use in the City's GIS database. PARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN UPDATE THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. k 2.0 INTRODUCTION F THE PLANNING C A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN This Parks and Recreation Master is an update of the 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Development of this updated plan took place from October 2021 to December 2022, and included a community engagement, leadership interviews, a needs assessment survey, inventory and level of service analysis, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis. The Master Plan Update provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of this growing community. - 0 i L PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 19 Section 2.0 B. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Parks and Recreation is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and for providing a quality system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the community. The Department is also responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways system and the urban forest. The Meridian Parks and Recreation system consists of 528.52 acres of parkland, 381.862 maintained, 65.758 undeveloped, and 80.9 acres of contracted sites. The system is made up of 25 parks, 15.53 miles of City-maintained pathways, and 28.54 miles of pathways maintained by others, Lakeview Golf Course, Meridian Swimming Pool,the Meridian Homecourt, a senior center, and a community center. Additionally, Parks and Recreation offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, and special events, and handles shelter/field reservations and temporary use permits. C. MISSION, VISION, AND VALUES As part of the 2015 Master Planning process, the Department developed a Mission,Vision, and Values (MVV). The MVV were reviewed as part of the Master Plan Update. MISSION VISION 115 The Meridian Parks and Recreation Department's mission is to enhance our Meridian Parks and Recreation is a premier community's quality of life by providing department that provides family-focused innovatively designed parks,connected opportunities for the Meridian community pathways,and diverse recreational and responds to a growing and changing opportunities for all citizens of Meridian population. that create lasting memories. FOCUS AREAS 04. Quality Community � We provide quality parks, We build the sense of We provide places and pathways,and recreational community in Meridian by opportunities that create opportunities that are connecting people through quality of life experiences,bring beautifully designed, parks,pathways,programs, balance to working individuals exceptionally maintained, and events that bring and families,and are fun and safe,and create memories enjoyment to individuals enjoyable.At the end of the day, for the citizens and visitors to and families of all ages and this is what it's all about! Meridian. abilities. 20 CITY OF • Introduction D. RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND INTEGRATION As part of the master planning process, BerryDunn evaluated and utilized information from recent past and/or current planning work. The consultant team consolidated relevant information from these planning documents, inventory maps, budgets,work plans, and funding plans utilized by the Parks and Recreation Department to facilitate the comprehensive coordination of direction and recommendations. Documents included: • City of Meridian Strategic Plan (2021-2025) • 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan • City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan (2019) • ULI Meridian Pathways Briefing Book (2022) • Pathways Master Plan • Impact Fees Study • Ten Mile Specific Area Plan • Future Land Use Map E. METHODOLOGY OF THIS PLANNING PROCESS This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff, with input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. This team provided input to the BerryDunn consulting team throughout the planning process. This collaborative effort created a plan that fully utilizes the consultant's expertise and incorporates the local knowledge and institutional history that only community members can provide.The project consisted of the following tasks: • Strategic Kick-off: - October 10, 2021 • Leadership Interviews—October 13-15, 2021 • Survey—October 2021 —January 2022 • Community Center Feasibility Study— November 2021 —April 2022 • Community Engagement— November 2021 • Focus Groups— November 16-18, 2021 • Public Presentation— November 18, 2021 • Inventory— November 2021 • Level of Service Analysis—December 2021 • Cost Recovery Study—January-May 2022 • Findings Presentation— February 23-24, 2022 • Draft Recommendations Presentation —September 2022 • Draft & Final Plan Presentation —December 2022 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. . 0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS III IDENTIFIED NEEDS A. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Population and Demographics Trends Gaining a clear understanding of the existing and projected demographic character of the City is an important component of the planning process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan. By analyzing population data, trends emerge that can inform decision-making and resource allocation. Fes'f :l �i 7 � I PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 23 Section 3.0 Key demographic components were analyzed to identify trends that may influence the planning and provision of public parks and recreation services in Hampton over the next five years and beyond. Community characteristics analyzed and discussed below consist of: • Existing and Projected Population Totals • Age Distribution • Ethnic/Racial diversity • Educational Attainment • Household Information • Employment By analyzing population data, trends emerge that can inform decision making and resource allocation strategies for the provision of parks, recreation, and open space management. This demographic profile was compiled in January 2021 from a combination of sources including the Esri Business Analyst, American Community Survey, and U.S. Census. The full demographics report was provided as a staff document. The following topics are covered in detail here: i AGE Ft POPULATION GENDER RACE&ETHNIC HOUSEHOLD EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY DISTRIBUTION CHARACTER DATA CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO .�- What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends & Identified Needs City of Meridian Demographic Profilew The City of Meridian demographic profile was developed to provide an analysis of household and economic data in the area, helping to understand the type of park and recreation components that may best serve the community. BerryDunn worked with the City of Meridian to identify the best source for population data and estimates. Data referenced throughout this report was primarily sourced from Esri Business Analyst as of January 2021, utilizing the U.S Census data from 2020 to provide estimates for 2021. In addition, when applicable, other sources were referenced such as the American Community Survey and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's County Health Rankings for data related to health outcomes. Comparisons to the State of Idaho and the United States were referenced to provide additional context and understanding to the demographic make-up of the City of Meridian. Poputation Meridian has experienced significant growth in the past two decades. In 2000, Meridian had a population of 42,569. The City added an estimated 82,221 new residents over the past ■ ■ two decades. From 2010 to 2021, the annual compound growth rate was estimated at 4.29%, compared to 1.68% in Idaho, and 0.70% in the United States. In 2021,the population in the City was estimated at 124,790—with an anticipated growth rate of 124,790 2.69% compound annual growth rate between 2021 and 2026. If POPULATION this growth rate trend continues,the City could reach more than Source:2021 Esri Business Analyst 142,000 residents in 2026. 160,000 142,522 140,000 124,790 120,000 100,000 77,797 30,000 60,000 42,569 40,000 20,000 0 2000 Total Population 2010 Total Population 2021 Total Population 2026 Total Population Figure 1: Projected Population Growth in City of Meridian,2000-2030 Source:Esri Business Analyst RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 3.0 According to Esri Business Analyst, the median age in the City of Meridian was 34.3 years old in 2021, younger than the State of Idaho (36.3) and the United States (38.8). The median age is projected to stay relatively the same at 34.2 years old in 2026. 34.3 MEDIAN AGE The age distribution in the City of Meridian in 2021 was generally younger than the State of Idaho and the United States. Over 25% Source:2021 Esri Business Analyst of the population was between the ages of 0 and 14 years old, compared to 21% in Idaho and 18% of the United States. 10.00% 9.00% 8.00% 7.00% 6.00% I 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.000/0 I III I 0.00% ��Q 1O,r ry`L� �`LQ O n�� Obi bfib° NO N Orb y1q Orb `bhx e � D R h 5 b 1 1 ■City of Meridian ■Idaho ■USA Figure 2:Age Distribution in Meridian Compared to State of Idaho Source:2021 Esri Business Analyst Diversityof • Understanding the race and ethnic character of Meridian residents is important because it can be reflective of the diverse history, values, and heritage of the community. This type of information can assist the City in creating and offering recreational programs that are relevant and meaningful to residents. In addition,this type of data when combined with the Level of Service analysis can be used in finding gaps and disparities when it comes to equitable access to parks. In the City of Meridian,the majority(90.1%) of residents identify as white. Only 8.4% of residents are of Hispanic origin. HISPANIC TWO OR MORE OTHER ASIAN AFRICAN WHITE POPULATION RACES RACES POPULATION AMERICAN POPULATION POPULATION 8.4% 3.6% 2.4% 2.2% 1.0% 90.1% Figure 3: Race Comparison for Total Population in City of Meridian Source:Esri Business Analyst Educational Attainment = CITY OF • What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends & Identified Needs Figure 4 below shows the percentage of residents (25+)that obtained various levels of education in the City of Meridian. Only four percent of the residents had not received a high school or equivalent diploma, while more than 25% had completed a Bachelor's Degree, and 13% had obtained a Graduate or Professional Level Degree. This is higher than the State of Idaho overall (10.4%) but on average with the United States overall (13%). Less than 9th 9-12th Grade/No �----- Graduate/Professional _ Degree Grade Diploma 1% 3% High School I Diploma 18% G ED/Alternative _ Credential i Bachelor's Degree 3% 1 y' 25% 1 Some College/No ' Degree Associate's Degree 25% 12% Figure 4: Educational Attainment in Meridian Source:Esri Business Analyst Household Overview According to the American Community Survey, approximately 8.75% of City households were under the poverty level, with a median household income of$78,960. The household income in the City was higher than the State of Idaho ($59,510) and the United States ($64,730), with 18.3% of residents earning between $100,000 and $149,999 annually. Only 5.0% of households made less than $15,000 per year. 25.0% 20.0% r 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% ' O°° qOq qAq qqQ qQQ qAq QAq QAq a�E ss5p. INQ, %,\" ci 1 Q, ^�1 �e o o° o4Z o°� ps ps sR`L 69 ■City of Meridian ■Idaho ■USA Figure 5:Median Household Income Distribution,2021 Estimates Source:Esri Business Analyst RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 3.0 Employment In 2021, an estimated 2.6% of Meridian's population was unemployed, lower than the State of Idaho (4.2%) and the =�= United States (6.2%). Approximately 74% of the population was employed in white collar positions, which encompass jobs where employees typically perform managerial, technical, administrative, and/or professional capacities. Another 17% of 2.6% the City's population were employed in blue collar positions, such UNEMPLOYMENT RATE as construction, maintenance, etc. Finally, 8% Meridian residents were employed in the service industry. An estimated 82.3% of Source:2021 Esri Business Analyst working residents drive alone to work,while 19% of residents spent seven plus hours a week commuting to and from work. People • - According to the American Community Survey, 9.30% of Meridian's population in 2020 experienced living with some sort of disability. This is lower than the state at 13.7% but still reaffirms the importance of inclusive programming and ADA transition plans for parks and facilities. Respondents of the American Community Survey who report any one of the six disability types (identified below) are considered to have a disability. Likewise, an individual may identify has experiencing more than one disability. Therefore,the percentages below do not equal the total percentage of individuals who live with a disability in the City. Types of disabilities within City of Meridian: • Hearing difficulty—2.9% • Vision difficulty— 1.4% • Cognitive difficulty—3.2% • Ambulatory difficulty—4.5% • Self-care difficulty— 1.9% • Independent living difficulty—4.3% Health • Wellness Understanding the status of a community's health can help inform policies related to recreation and fitness. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's County Health Rankings and Roadmaps provides annual insight on the general health of national, state, and county populations. The City of Meridian y- w is located in Ada County which was ranked among the healthiest counties in Idaho; in 2020, it ranked 3rd out of 44 counties in Idaho for Health Outcomes. Figure 6 on the following page provides additional information regarding the County's health data as it may relate to parks, recreation, and community services.' The strengths indicated below are those areas where the City of Meridian ranked higher than top U.S. performers or the State of Idaho. The areas to explore are those where the County ranked lower than the State or top U.S. performers. 1 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,County Health Rankings 2020,http://www.Countyhealthrankings.org = CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO What We Want — Our Community, • • • Needs STRENGTHS AREAS TO EXPLORE • PHYSICAL INACTIVITY ADULT SMOKING • UNINSURED ADULT OBSEITY • PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS 0 SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED • DENTISTS INFECTIONS • MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS • PREVENTABLE HOSPITAL STAYS Figure 6:Ada County Health Rankings Overview Source:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's County Health Rankings and Roadmaps B. CURRENT TRENDS The provision of public parks and recreation services can be influenced by a wide variety of trends, including the desires of different age groups within the population, community values, and popularity of a variety of recreational activities and amenities.Within this section of the Plan, a number of local and national trends are reviewed that should be considered by the City when determining where to allocate resources toward the provision of parks, recreational facilities, and recreational programming for residents and visitors. Park • Recreation Influ- • Trends The following pages summarize some of the key trends that could impact the City of Meridian over the next five to ten years. In addition, Esri Business Analyst provides estimates for activity participation and consumer behavior based on a specific methodology and survey data to makeup what Esri terms "Market Potential Index." EstimatedSection 3.0 Local Participation The following charts showcase the participation in fitness activities, outdoor recreation, and sports teams for adults 25 and older, compared to the State of Idaho. The activities with the highest participation include walking for exercise, swimming, hiking,jogging/running, and weightlifting. 30.0% 28.3% 25.0% 20.0% 19.0% 15.0% , 13.6% 10.0% 10.0% 8 0% 5.0% "3.91% 2.8 0.0% Aerobics Pilates Swimming Walking For Weight Lifting Yoga Zumba Exercise �City of Meridian -Idaho Figure 7:Adult Participation For Fitness Activities Source:Esri Business Analyst In regard to fitness activities,walking for exercise was the most popular, with almost 30% of adult participation. Swimming followed next,with 19% of adult participation. Finally,weightlifting was another popular activity with 13.6% participation. 16.0% 13.5% 14.4%13.8% 14.0% 12.0% 10.7% 1 10.0% 8.0% 6-7 6.0% 3.9% 4.4% 4% 4.1 3 o 4.0% 2.4% 4% % 0.0% • , , • rats `1 �a`f1 nail Pto Qac o�c Q` akaNCO o�� awe `eIS, oc oar r 0 Gacoe e��•�r ��r �`r��o' S000i Zo ��° �`��� O� �J �City of Meridian -Idaho Figure 8:Adult Participation in Outdoor Recreation Source:Esri Business Analyst The most popular outdoor recreation activity in 2021 was hiking with almost 15% participation. Jogging or running was second (13.8%)followed by overnight camping trips (13.5%). INCITY OF .IAN,IDAHO What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends & Identified Needs 10.0% 9.0% 8.6% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.1/o 0 4.6% 4.6% 4 2% 4.0% 3.4% 3.0% 2.7% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Softball Tennis Volleyball City of Meridian Idaho Figure 9:Adult Participation in Team Sports Source:Esri Business Analyst The most popular team sport in Meridian is basketball at 8.6%, followed by football and soccer both at 4.6%, and then tennis (4.2%). Regional and National Trends The following sections summarize regional and national trends that are relevant to Meridian, Idaho. This report details the trends and interests that were identified within the public engagement process. The information contained in this report can be used by staff when planning new programs, considering additions to parks and new park amenities, and creating the annual budget and capital improvement plan. Understanding trends can also help an organization reach new audiences. Trends could also determine where to direct additional data collection efforts within an organization. The full Trends Report was provided as a staff document: A wide variety of sources were used in gathering information for this report, including: • American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) • American Council on Exercise (ACE) • Forbes • Harris Poll Results/The Stagwell Group • Impacts Experience • National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) • The Aspen Institute • The Learning Resource Network (LERN) • The New York Times • The Outdoor Industry Association • The Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE America) • USA Pickleball website Section 3.0 Administrative Trends Municipal parks and recreation structures and delivery systems have changed and more alternative methods of delivering services are emerging. Certain services are being contracted out and cooperative agreements with non-profit groups and other public institutions are being developed. Newer partners include health systems, social services,justice system, education,the corporate sector, and community service agencies. These partnerships reflect both a broader interpretation of the mandate of parks and recreation agencies and the increased willingness of other sectors to work together to address community issues. The relationship with health agencies is vital in promoting wellness. The traditional relationship with education agencies and the sharing of facilities through joint use agreements is evolving into cooperative planning and programming aimed at addressing youth inactivity levels and community needs. In addition,the role of parks and recreation management has shifted beyond traditional facility oversight and activity programming. The ability to evaluate and interpret data is a critical component of strategic decision making. In an article titled "The Digital Transformation of Parks and Rec" in the Parks and Recreation Magazine from February 2019,there are several components that allow agencies to keep up with administrative trends and become an agent of change: 1. Develop a digital transformation strategy— How will your agency innovate and adapt to technology? 2. Anticipate needs of the community through data—What information from your facilities, programs, and services can be collected and utilized for decision making? 3. Continuous education - How can you educate yourself and your team to have more knowledge and skills as technology evolves? 4. Focus on efficiency— In what ways can your operations be streamlined? 5. Embrace change as a leader— How can you help your staff to see the value in new systems and processes? b. Reach out digitally— Be sure that the public knows how to find you and ways that they can be involved. Conservation One of the key pillars of parks and recreation is the role that it plays in conservation. Managing and protecting open space, providing opportunities for people to connect with nature, and educating communities about conservation are all incredibly important. One of the key components of conservation is addressing climate change. Local parks and recreation can help by building climate resilient communities through water management, green infrastructure, and sustainability. A report by NRPA in 2017 titled "Park and Recreation Sustainability Practices" surveyed over 400 park and recreation agencies and found the top five ways that local departments are acting on conservation and climate change include: • Alternative Transportation—77% reduce carbon footprint through offering transportation alternatives • Watershed Management—70% adopt protective measures for watershed management • Air Quality—53% plant and manage tree canopy that improves air quality Sustainable Education—52% educate the public about sustainability practices Stormwater Management—51% proactively reduce stormwater through green infrastructure Marketing & Social - • In today's modern world, there is ample opportunity to promote and market parks and recreation services. The process of assessing marketing efforts begins with a needs assessment that details how the community prefers to receive information. Then, a Marketing Plan should be developed that is catered to the agency's resources, including staff,time, and budget. This should guide the agency for one to three years; at which time the Marketing Plan should be updated. 32 CITY OF MERIDIAN, . • What We Want — Our Community, • • • Needs Technology has made it easier to reach a broad, location-dependent audience who can be segmented by demographics. However, it has also caused a gap in the way parks and recreation agencies are able to communicate. Agencies around the country have previously not dedicated substantial funding to marketing, however it is becoming a critical piece to receiving participants. Without dedicated staff and support, it is difficult to keep up with social media trends which seem to change daily. Furthermore, with an overarching desire to standardize a municipality's brand,there may be limitations to the access and control that a parks and recreation agency has over their marketing. It is essential that professionals become advocates for additional resources,training, and education. Having a strong presence on social networks,through email marketing, and through traditional marketing will help enhance the perception from the community. Partnerships (Pubtic, Private, and Intradepartmentat) Burgeoning populations require access to facilities outside of the current inventory in typical parks and recreation agencies, and the ability to partner with other departments within a municipality is crucial to meeting the programming needs of a community. Forming healthy partnerships with public libraries and school districts to utilize facilities and collaborate on programs is one of the top priorities for agencies that do not currently have agreements in place. Additionally, offering cooperative, consortium-based programs with existing non-profit and private entities allows several organizations to join partnerships to collectively offer programs in specific niche areas. For example, if one organization has the best computer labs,facilities, and instructors, then they offer that program for the consortium. If another organization has the largest aquatic center with trained staff,then they offer aquatics programs for the consortium, potentially eliminating duplication in programming. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the need for partnerships due to budget and staff cuts. Community Centers Community centers are public gathering places where people of the community may socialize, participate in recreational or educational activities, obtain information, and seek counseling or support services, amongst other things. 2Several studies have found a correlation between the outdoor leisure involvement that community centers provide and a person's greater environmental concern. The main impact from the addition of these centers is the improvement in community health, social connectivity, and mental well-being. A national long-term study conducted of over 17,000 teens who frequented recreation facilities found that they were 75 percent more likely to engage in the highest category of moderate to strenuous physical exercise. Since these activities that they partake in involve a considerable amount of effort, the benefits have been shown to include "reduced obesity, a diminished risk of disease, an enhanced immune system and most importantly, increased life expectancy".3 Clubs and sports offered by community centers also strengthen social connections and reduce social isolation.4 Along with an increase in social connectivity brought by community centers comes a sense of satisfaction with a person's choice of friends and perceived success in life. The evidence strongly suggests that this satisfaction can rise to much higher levels if participation in outdoor recreation begins in childhood. The following infographic demonstrates the potential for community services in offering non-traditional services. 2 Community centers.County Health Rankings&Roadmaps.(2020,January 21).https://www.countyhealthrankings.orgz take-action-to-improve-hea Ith/what-works-for-hea Ith/strateg ies/commun ity-centers. 3 National Association of Community Health Centers,Inc.(2012,August).Powering Healthier Communities: November 2010 Community Health Centers Address the Social Determinants of Health. 4 Community centers.County Health Rankings&Roadmaps.(2020,January 21).https://www.countyhealthrankings.orgz take-action-to-improve-hea Ith/what-works-for-hea Ith/strateg ies/commun ity-centers. PARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 33 Section 3.0 r Recreationan ImportantCommunities Nationwide Per a recent NRPA poll,Americans urge their local recreation center to offer a wide variety of nontraditional services,incurtling_. W Healthy Programming Nature-Based Living Classes for Older Adults Activities 51% 46% 43 Access to Inclusive Facilities Health Computers and for All Abilities Clinics and ,t the Internet and Needs Services 43% 41% 38% These are in addition to services traditionally offered by park and recreation agencies—including fitness centers, out-of-school time programming and aquatic facilities. ` �dr�P�a�� www.nrpa.org/Park-Pulse LNRPA aa� A=so�1ar�oI eeause r aeserve Figure 10:Non-Traditional Services Desired in Community Center Source:NRPA Park Pulse Community • - Community-wide events and festivals often act as essential place-making activities for residents, economic drivers, and urban brand builders. Chad Kaydo describes the phenomenon in the Governing Magazine: County and municipal officials and entrepreneurs "see the power of cultural festivals, innovation-focused business conferences and the like as a way to spur short term tourism while shaping an image of the host City as a cool, dynamic location where companies and citizens in modern, creative industries can thrive." 5 According to the 2020 Event Trends Report by EventBrite,the following trends are expected to impact event planners and community builders in the coming years:' • Focus on Sustainability: Zero-waste events are quickly becoming an expectation. Some of the primary ways of prioritizing environmental sustainability include e-tickets, reusable, or biodegradable items, offering vegan/vegetarian options, encouraging public transport and carpooling, and working with venues that recycle. • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): Ensuring that the venue is inclusive to not only all abilities by offering ADA facilities, but also welcoming to all races, ethnicities, and backgrounds through signage, messaging, and the lineup of speakers. Ways to incorporate a focus on inclusivity include planning for diversity through speakers,talent, and subject matter, enacting a code of conduct that promotes equity, and possibly providing scholarships to attendees. • Engaging Experiences: Being able to customize and cater the facility to create immersive events that bring together culture, art, music, and elements of a company's brand will be critical in creating a more authentic experience. 5 Kaydo,Chad. "Cities Create Music,Cultural Festivals to Make Money." Governing,Governing, 18 Dec.2013,www. governing.com/archive/gov-cities-create-music-festivals.htmi.Accessed 30 Sept.2021. 6 "The 2020 Event Trends Report-Eventbrite." Eventbrite US Blog,2020,www.eventbrite.com/blog/academy/2020- event-trends-report/.Accessed 30 Sept.2021. = CITY OF • What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends & Identified Needs Golf Courses - Uses - Agencies may decide to repurpose traditional golf courses into more creative spaces for new opportunities. While modifications may require additional equipment or expenses, some changes offer new programs with minimal costs. Below are some of the primary ways that golf courses are utilizing and reactivating their spaces to draw more attention, participants, and revenue. • Disc Golf According to the Professional Disc Golf Association (PDGA), disc golf has increased in participation significantly since its initial start in 1975. Approximately 92% of players are male and 8%female. In 2018, PDGA had 46,457 active members; 2,496 were under 18. In 2010,the number of disc golf courses worldwide was 3,276. In 2018,that number increased more than 150%to 8,364. The majority of play takes place in the United States.7 • Footgolf o A true mix of soccer and golf, footgolf is a sport played on a golf course where the players goal is to kick a soccer ball into a cup in as few shots as possible. The sport was invented in 2009 and most formal league play is managed through American FootGolf League. Footgolf is an international sport, and it is estimated to be played in over 20 countries. 8 According to the World Golf Foundation study on Alternative Golf Experiences (2015), Footgolf is estimated to be in 445 facilities in worldwide. Approximately 87% of participants are very likely to continue playing and 81% are satisfied with Footgolf. 9 • 5k Run/Walks Perhaps one of the most well-known recreational activities is the road race. The most popular race distance is the 5k. There were approximately 8.84 million registrants for 5ks in the United States in 2017, claiming 49% of all registrants (compared to the half-marathon at number two with 11% of all registrants). Women make up about 59% of participants with 41% being male. 10 • Fat Biking One of the newest trends in adventure cycling is "fat bike," multiple speed bikes that are made to ride where other bikes can't be ridden, with tires that are up to 5 inches wide run at low-pressure for extra traction. Most fat bikes are used to ride on snow but they are also very effective for riding on any loose surface like sand or mud. They also work well on most rough terrain or just riding through the woods. This bike offers unique opportunities to experience nature in ways that wouldn't be possible otherwise." • Special Events and Weddings Golf courses can provide an ideal venue for special events. With an often picturesque viewshed and well-maintained landscaping, golf courses are becoming more popular for events such as banquets, conferences, and weddings. 7 "2018 Disc Golf Demographics," Professional Disc Golf Association.Accessed October 2019. 8 Linton Weeks, "FootGolf:A New Sport Explored in 19 Questions," NPR:https://www.npr.org/sections/ theprotojournalist/2014/03/13/288546935/footgolf-a-new-sport-explored-in-19-questions,March 13,2014 9 "Alternative Golf Experiences,"World Golf Foundation:http://ngcoa.0rg/ewebeditpro5/upload/AGEReport 12.15. pdf,December 2015. 10 "U.S. Road Race Participation Numbers Hold Steady for 2017," Running USA,https:Hrunningusa.org/RUSA/ News/2018/U.S. Road Race Participation Numbers Hold Steady for 2017.as'x,Accessed October 2019. 11 Steven Pease, "Fat Bikes,How to Get the Most Out of Winter Cycling," Minnesota Cycling Examiner,http://www. examiner.com/article/fat-bikes-the-latest-trend-adventure-cycling,February 1,2014. RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 3.0 Sustain ility . • Sustainability and eco-friendliness have become a priority in park design. Parks provide ideal opportunities for green infrastructure, as sites are often already highly visible, multifunctional public spaces that typically include green elements. The use of green infrastructure has increased over the last decade as knowledge of its benefits has grown. High-performance landscapes with green infrastructure provide a number of benefits to communities, including: • Greenjobs • Opportunities for recreation, education, and relaxation • Economic growth • Improved water and water quality • Community resilience • Lower urban heat island effects • Manage flood risks • New and improved wildlife habitat The implementation of green storm water infrastructure duplicates a natural process to prevent, capture, and/or filter storm water runoff. A survey by the Trust for Public Land found that more than 5,000 acres of parkland in 48 major cities have been modified in some way to control storm water. With community parks containing thousands of acres across the country,there is a multitude of opportunities for integrating green infrastructure into park systems nationwide. Common green storm water infrastructure projects include bio-retention, bio swales, constructed wetlands, impervious surface disconnections, green roofs, permeable pavements, rainwater harvesting, stream restoration, urban tree canopy, land conservation, vegetation management, and vegetated buffers. Outdoor & Adventure Recreation Trends Adventure Programming It is common for adventure excursions to be hosted by private outfitters; however, more municipalities have started to offer exciting experiences such as zip lining, challenge/obstacle courses, and other risk- taking elements on a local level. These agencies may form partnerships with specialized companies to provide adventure packages. Private companies may hire and train their own staff, maintain equipment, and develop marketing campaigns. A lease agreement may grant the municipality a certain percentage of gross revenues. Outdoor Adventure Impact from Covid-19 Consumers are seeking activities to help them stay occupied and healthy as Covid-19 necessitates social distancing. As a result, a number of outdoor activities have experienced growth. Many sought out family-based activities in order to keep everyone safe and increase health. A Harris Poll from October 2020 found that 69% of Americans reported a heightened appreciation for outdoor spaces during the pandemic, with 65%sharing that they try to get outside of the house as much as possible. Outdoor cycling tops the list of popular outdoor activities as bicycle sales increased 63% (as of June 2020) compared to the same time period the year prior. For the first several months of the Covid-19 outbreak,the growth in bicycle sales was from family-friendly bikes. Then the growth in sales shifted to higher-end bicycles (including road bikes and full suspension mountain bikes). This was likely due to a shortage of family-friendly bikes as well as from cyclists more willing to invest in the activity for the future. 36 CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO What We Want — Our Community, • • • Needs Paddle sports (including kayaks, paddleboards, rafts, and canoes) have also increased in popularity as the sale of equipment rose 56% in 2020 over the prior year. Inflatable versions of kayaks and paddleboards have gained in popularity due to their cost and the ability of the consumer to store these bulky pieces of equipment. Many people will not flock back to fitness centers to exercise following the Covid-19 outbreak. With the desire to keep moving, however, people are walking and running outdoors when the weather is suitable. Outdoor walking and running clubs will continue to be a popular way for people to exercise with others in a safe manner. u. uOMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT Public input was held in November 16-18, 2021, at various locations within the City. There was a total of eight meetings with focus groups, four meetings with stakeholders, and targeted teen and senior focus groups. In addition, the consultant team conducted interviews with the elected officials and the City leadership. Focus group participation was by invitation extended via the parks and recreation staff with the idea of mixing area residents and stakeholders with differing points of view to solicit a broad-based perspective. Each meeting was approximately 90 minutes long. A series of questions were facilitated by the consultant team to ensure adequate input was received from all attendees. On November 18, 2021, an open, public forum was held at the Meridian City Hall to present the results of the public engagement meetings and to receive feedback and validation from the public. The forum was offered both in person and virtually. A series of questions were asked of the participants, ranging from strengths and weaknesses, to programs, to amenities. The majority of participants had lived in the community for more than 20 years, with a tie for the second largest group having lived in Meridian between less than 5 years and 10-19 years. Participants were also asked about community values and priorities. A summary of responses follow; however, a full summary was provided as a staff document. lift- PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN �1 i UPDATE 37 Section 3.0 Strengths Staff/leadership approachable,responsive,open to new ideas,follow through Diversity of offerings(facilities and programs[movies in the park]) Location of parks well planned,bikeable,for everyone,parks are an asset Partnerships(Library,other Departments,Organizations) Parks are well maintained Foresight/planni ngfi nfrastructure/keeping up with growth Amenities at the park(the extras) Accessibility Department serves the commu nity well Communication{ease of access) Focus Group Strengths Areas of Improvement Lack of parking Communication Need more athletic fields(diamonds for youth) Greater need for more open space,more park space Lack oftournament field facility Lack of indoor fields Lack of lighted fields Lack of connectivity,bike parks,trails Facilities for programs not as good as parks Greater need for more reservable space(outdoor/indoor) Courts for basketball,tennis,pickleball Focus Group Areas of Improvement or satisfied with current programs or satisfied with current quality of offered by the department parks and facilities offered by the department 82%of participants rated the level of 65%of participants rated the quality maintenance for parks and facilities as of customer services excellent with excellent or very good another 19% rating as very good Focus Group Satisfaction Ratings CITY OF • What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends Identified Needs Desired Programs and Activities Competitive swimming • Activity Fair/Special events Official traning programs Adaptive recreation • Adventure based,especially attractive toteens More movies in the park Bocci Ball • Cooking classes Disc Golf Dodgeball Evening programs • Histodra l programs Teen night Horseshoe Markets Pickleball Programs for working with your ha rids • Races/triathlons I nt ra m U ra i s Swim lessons Tennis Indoor Soccer and Futsal,Adult Soccer Focus Group Additional. Programs Additional Facilities and Amenities Indoor sports complex Multi-purpose fields Indoor swimming pools JUMP(Jacks Urban Meeting Place) Lighted fields Indoor field facility Synthetic turf Auditorium Parking Communitygarden Table and chairs hang out space,power,Wi-Pi(used for gathering,studying) Outdoor aquatics Disc Golf(year round,dedicated) Adds kate park Ice Rink Event venue(rentable) Community Center Rockwall Focus Group New Facitities Priorities Connectivity Indoor facility Rectangular fields to support demand Land acquisition Manage growth Create a multi-sport complex Upgrade all parksto offer more amenities Useable community center Inclusiveness Providing ample space and accessibility for our growing community Adventure type amenities(Bike Park,Skate Park) RECREATIONFocus Group Prorities PARKS AND Section 3.0 In summary,focus group participants are very satisfied with the current programs offered (64%) and with the quality of parks and facilities (86%). And the top priorities over the next five years are connectivity, an indoor facility, additional rectangle fields, and land acquisition. D. RANDOM INVITATION COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY SUMMARY Introduction - . . . . . The purpose of this survey was to gather public feedback on City of Meridian parks open space, pathways, and recreation facilities, services, and programs. This survey research effort and subsequent analysis were designed and conducted to assist the City of Meridian in updating its Parks and Recreation Master Plan regarding existing and potential future facilities and services. The survey was conducted using three primary methods: 1) a mail-back survey, 2) an online, invitation- only web survey to further encourage response from those residents already within the defined invitation sample, 3) an open link online survey for members of the public who were not part of the invitation sample. The analysis herein primarily focuses on responses from the invitation sample. However, open link responses are additionally analyzed and discussed in a separate section of the report, highlighting similarities from the invitation sample. A total of 3,500 surveys were mailed to a random sample of Meridian residents in October 2021, 312 completed responses were received. The margin of error for the statistically valid responses is approximately +/- 5.5 percentage points calculated for questions at 50 percent response. The open link survey received an additional 378 completed responses for a total of 690 responses. Summary of - • Findings This section provides a brief overview of some of the key findings in the survey. The summary focuses primarily on the statistically valid invitation sample. A full copy of the Final Survey Report and Open- ended Responses were provided as a staff document. Key finding from the survey are shown below: KEY FINDINGS COMMUNICATION Both samples agree that emails from the city(63%),social media(40%),the Meridian Parks and Recreation Activity Guide(35%),and The City of Meridian website(29%)are the best methods for communication about parks and recreation opportunities.The interest in the all the different methods suggests that residents prefer a variety of communication methods. COMMUNITY The Invite sample and the Open link sample are mostly in agreement of which types of amenities they would like to see at the new community center,with the top priorities being an outdoor plaza/activity space(64%), indoor activity/event space(58%),and fitness/wellness space(57%). Invite respondents would like to see a variety of programs and services offered at the new community center that cater to different ages(children, teens,adults and seniors). Open link respondents are more interested in community education classes. = CITY OF . . • What We Want — Our Community, • • • Needs CURRENT CONDITIONS Pathways and trails are considered the most important facilities/amenities to households,with 86%of the invite sample rating trails a 4 or 5,with 5 being"very important".There is also strong interest in picnic shelters, playgrounds,and swimming pools/aquatic facilities. Rodeo grounds were of lesser importance.The Invite sample indicates that amenities at larger, more athletic-focused facilities are meeting their needs.They are most satisfied with playgrounds,athletic fields,and ball fields.Overall,there is high satisfaction with at least half rating most facilities as a 4 or 5 with 5 being"completely"meeting needs. Swimming pools/aquatic facilities could use a bit more attention,as they are considered relatively important to households but rate lower in terms of meeting needs.Along with aquatics,other top areas of focus for the Invite sample include paths/trails and the community/recreation center. FUTURE FACILITIES,AMENITIES AND PROGRAMS Invite respondents feel strongly that pathways and trails are the top priority to be added,expanded,or improved in Meridian, mentioned by almost half(48%)within the top 3 most important needs. After trails, invite respondents rank a community/recreation center highest(26%),followed by an indoor aquatics facility(24%), dog parks(22%),shade structures in parks(18%),and improved park amenities(16%).Open link respondents were generally in agreement but pickleball was also a focus for this sample.The top areas that would increase utilization of parks and facilities are shade(46%)and awareness of programs/communications (44%),followed by additional facilities and amenities(24%)and quality of equipment(23%). VALUESANDVISION The top three community issues that the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation should focus on improving are pathway connectivity(47%), land preservation/acquisition (32%),and maintenance of parks and facilities (31%).The Open link sample agrees on pathway connectivity(44%) but is also comparatively more interested in developing new parks in under-served areas(36%). FINANCIAL CHOICES There is a lack of consensus on whether fee increases would affect participation. Invite respondents are more sensitive to fee increases. Overall,there is general satisfaction with the current fees for both facilities and programs. However, more than half of the Invite sample were unsure about the fees for facilities and programs.Very few respondents believe the fees to be too high (4-6%). If respondents had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, Invite respondents would allocate about 1/5 of the total(about$20)to adding more pathways. Other top priorities would be making improvements and maintaining existing park facilities($14)and expanding aquatics($14). Open link respondents are generally in agreement on the top 3 areas of spend but also allocate comparatively more money to outdoor athletic fields and courts. PARKS AND • UPDATE Section 3.0 In 2015, GreenPlay completed a Parks and Recreation Master Plan also using RRC as the survey firm. With the merger of GreenPlay and BerryDunn,the project manager from the 2015 study was also the project manager for the 2022 update. This allowed the consultant team to conduct comparisons from the survey responses from 2015 and 2022 to see if the community's needs and desires had changed during the time. When looking at future needs to add, expand, or improve, in 2015 the top five responses were pathways and trails (50%), indoor aquatic facility(33%), community/recreation center (27%), and shade structures in parks and improved park amenities (23%). The results in 2021 were very similar for the top five responses with pathways and trails repeating as the top need (49%), followed by community/ recreation center (27%), indoor aquatic facility (24%), dog parks (23%), and shade structures in parks rounding out the top 5 responses. Future Needs Q 14:Which three future needs would be MOST important to you and your household to be added,expanded,or improved in Meridian? 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Pathways&trails 49% so% Community/recreation center -27% -27% Indoor aquatics facility -24% -33% Dog parks -23% -1996 Shade structures in parks -1896 -23% Improved park amenities(drinking fountains,restrooms,benches,etc.)-16% -23% Playgrounds -16% -17% Fie ldhouse/gymnasium space -14% 4% Pickleball courts -12% 11% Lights for outdoor athletic facilities -1296 6% Performing arts center -1296 _9% New parks _1J.% _11% Ice rink _1096 _10% Fishing ponds _10% -12% Exercise station s along tra i is in parks -8% _11% Outdoor athletic fields/courts -8% -14% Splash pads -7% -8% Parking at recreational facilities ■5% E 5% Public art in the parks 4% _$-A Disc golf 4% E 5% Rodeo/equestrian facility 1% 3% Other(previously specified) _9% 4% n= 278 626 CITY OF • What We Want — Our • mmunity, Trends & Identified Needs Another comparison questions asked participants to allocate $100 in $5 increments to a list of identified projects and services. In 2015 the top priorities were to expand aquatics ($19.44), add more pathways ($17.69), make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities ($12.62), expand programs and activities ($11.29), and recreation center, including gym space and related activities. In 2021, priorities shifted so because the City purchased the Aquatic Center and the Home Court indoor athletics facility. The top four responses in 2021 were add more pathways ($19.54), make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities ($14.13), expand aquatics ($13.91), add new parks (($9.46), and recreation center including gym space and related activities. Allocation of Funding Adding more pathways is still a top priority.However,respondents allocated a greater amount to expanding aquatics and expanding programs and services in 2015. 019:With$5 increments being the smallest amount you might use,ifyou had$100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities,services a nd/or programs,how would you allocate that$100 across the following categories? Rating Category 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Add more pathways S19.54 S17.0) ':9ake improvementswd remvale antl $1413 $12.62 maintain ersting park facilRies Expand aquatics(irdwr ar aWd-,pool,splash $13.91 $19.44 pads,et.) Add new parks $9.46 ®$8.63 Recreation cemer,including gym space and $8.43 $8.75 R tedactivdies New ar-paM communiry Cenler(com munry S823 �$6.16 class/meeting rooms,activity spaces,etc) Expand programs and acfivilies(mare teen programs,senor programs,etc) $7.58 E11.29 Add ould-,athletic belt and mudsICIIIIIIIIII S727 CIIIIIIIIIIIII S7.14 Other enhancements(please specify heknv) S6.16 l S3.27 Provide more cry-wide special events $5.30 S5.02 „y PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE k� .a p: � ir• 4mO WHO WE ARE ORGANIZATIONAL & FINANCIAL ., ASSESSMENT A. ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS BerryDunn broadly assessed the current organizational and management structure and staffing of the Department with respect to effectiveness and efficiency. PEW tt 10 MA 44 City of Meridian, Idaho Who Organizationat BerryDunn broadly assessed the current organizational and management structure and staffing of the Department with respect to effectiveness and efficiency. Under the guidance of the Mayor and the City Council,the Parks and Recreation Director autonomously oversees daily operations including the budget, personnel, policy development, parks and pathways, facilities, special events,the Homecourt sports and fitness facility, Golf operations, and recreation programs and facilities. Supporting the Director is a leadership team that includes the Recreation Manager, Parks Superintendent, and the Facilities Manager. Staffing includes 48 full-time and 2 regular part-time positions broken out into six functional categories as shown in the organizational chart.12 No employees in the Department are represented under collective bargaining agreements. • Administration Division includes the Director's office, marketing, and other support services • The Parks Division includes daily operation and upkeep of the parks and outdoor spaces, pathways, and natural areas • The Recreation Division includes recreation, enrichment and leisure programs, special events and program operations, youth programs, senior services, and youth and adult sports programs The Aquatics Division includes responsibility for the seasonal operation of the Meridian Community Pool • The Golf Division includes the Lakeview Golf Course,the pro-shop, golf instruction, and events • The Homecourt Division includes oversight of the sports and fitness facility Full-time positions are supplemented by$1,098,000 in seasonal and casual labor budgets. Like other parks and recreation agencies across the United States,the Department has been challenged to receive adequate applicant pools over the past few years. Full-time department staffing was minimally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and remained fairly consistent between FY 2020 and FY 2022. Addition of the Lakeview Golf Course accounted for an addition of nine full-time positions in FY 2022. V AL 12 The six divisions represent functional areas and not necessarily reporting relationships. RECREATIONPARKS AND Section Comparing Meridian's Staffing to Other Typical Agencies In most typical agencies, golf is considered an enterprise activity and as such, is not included when comparing staffing levels for traditional parks and recreation services. As such,the nine full-time positions and the seasonal/casual positions are not included in the comparative analysis. In the current FY 2022 budget,the City supplemented the 39 full-time and 2 part-time positions with an additional 43 full-time equivalent (FTE) seasonal positions (20 in recreation and 23 in Parks Operations). The largest of the employee groups being lifeguards. In total,the City provides 83 FTE or 6.2 FTE per 10,000 residents. Comparing the City to other similar agencies in the 2022 NRPA Agency Performance Review, the City is in a broad range of agencies based on population. The category suggests that FTEs for typical agencies are between 4.3 (low)to 11.9 (high)with a median of 8.1 per 10,000 residents. Since Meridian's population of 133,470 is closer to the lower quartile and not the median, the consultant team suggest that staffing of approximately 6-7 FTE per 10,000 residents appears appropriate. To improve the current level of service in line with other typical agencies,the Department may want to consider addition of five to six new positions. As well, growth to a population of 142,522 by 2026 suggests an additional need for 5.58 positions to deliver the Department's current level of service. By 2050,the City's population is expected to increase over 33%to 197,463. This dramatic growth will require new parks and facilities necessitating additional operating and maintenance requirements. Another consideration is the distribution of positions. Most departments distribute positions in a manner that best suits its mission and community and typical agencies may dedicate 45% of available positions to park operations and maintenance, 31%to recreation, 17%to administration, 3%to capital development, and 3%to other positions. The Department distribution of staffing is shown in Table 1. The take-a-way is that the Department could certainly consider additional positions in the administrative area as the City grows. Typicat Staffing 2022 Meridian Budgeted Distribution Position Distribution Operations/Maintenance 45% 53% Recreation Programs 31% 43% FTE Administration 17% 3% FTE Capital Development 3% 0% FTE Other 3% 0% Total 100% 100% Table 1:Distribution of Meridian Budgeted Staffing 6 R - x 1 1� 7, Future Staffing Considerations observationsAfter evaluating the -.. positions to operate and its system over the next five years and up to an additional five positions as growth occurs in the City. AM.Ilk l Recr-711on MERIDIAN PARKS AND • Director 2022 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Marketing Administrative Aff Coariiinator Ass6tarrt u Pay Faclily Reaeation Supemtendent Manager Manager Palk ��� Head Gan Site Recreation Recreation MalntenanCe Profesaiorrel Supermors {`,00rdinator Goord'nekx (Ac6uities and Manager �General Homecourt(3) Speael ems} Manager Events Parirs Park Golf Course Marntenance Mairrlenance Asssfent Assislant Gon Homecourt Volunteer Assistant Crew Chief Superintendent Professionals Faciily p��m Ark 8 Gunure Foreman (3} Specialist PIr fi,���tor �ord'nat°r (2} Senior Mairrlenance Mair�e ante Mantenenoe C'On Mlairterenoe Teotnicians Technicians Technician Mantenance Aquatics Administrative Tednroiens(3} [2) 3} Technician(2) GOIf shop {oordiantor 4ssistant 9(2J F�rSISta<It Figure 11:Meridian Parks and Recreation 2022 Organizational Chart Park Park Reeaea�n M e intenan ce Operations �� Crew Chief Crew Chief �gCa�d�r �npefVlSOr nrel� Recreallon senior Mantenance Maintenance Reoreatian Teehnioiens Technician Coordinator Pathways Cily 1lrbarist Prgject Manager PARKS AND RECREATION �MASTER PLAN UPDATE 47 Section B. RECREATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS Program Development Understanding core services in the delivery of parks and recreation services will allow the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to improve upon those areas while developing strategies to assist in the delivery of other services. The basis of determining core services should come from the vision and mission developed by the City and what brings the greatest community benefit in balance with the competencies of the Department, current trends, and the market. The Department should pursue program development around the priorities identified by customer feedback, program evaluation process, and research. The following criteria should be examined when developing new programs. • Need: outgrowth of a current popular program, or enough demonstrated demand to successfully support a minimal start (one class for instance) • Budget: accounting for all costs and anticipated (conservative) revenues should meet cost recovery target established by the Department Location: appropriate, available, and within budget Instructor: qualified, available, and within budget Materials and Supplies: available and within budget Marketing Effort: adequate and timely opportunity to reach intended market, within budget (either existing marketing budget or as part of new program budget) Further research into what types of programming would be successful needs to be done. Successful programs utilize continuous creative assessments, research, and planning. The Department has a process that evaluates the success of current program offerings and criteria to determine if new program ideas should be instituted or if changes should be made to current programs. Maintaining the current dashboards and evaluation process will help to ensure success. Moreover, new leisure and recreation trends may drive different needs. It is very easy to focus on programs that have worked for a number of years, especially if they are still drawing enough interested participants to justify the program's continuation. Starting new programs, based on community demand and/or trends, can be risky, due to the inability to predict their success. If the program interest seems great, as with those identified in the citizen survey, then the programs should be expanded. Available space may hinder new or expanded opportunities in some cases. Using historical participation levels to determine program popularity and participant feedback can be helpful in deciding if programs should be continued. In addition, utilizing citizen surveys and participant feedback, and researching trends in park and recreational programming are useful tools in determining future programming needs and desires. Sources for trends information include: • State Parks and Recreation Associations and Conferences • National Recreation and Parks Association • International Health, Racquet, and Sports Association • Parks and Recreation Trade Publications • Outdoor Recreation Publications 48 CITY OF MERIDIAN, . • Who Organizationat Program Evaluati• All current programs should be evaluated annually to determine if they should be continued, changed (market segment focus,time/day offered, etc.), or discontinued. A few simple questions should be asked about each program that includes: • Is participation increasing or decreasing? If participation is increasing,then it could clearly mean that the program should be continued. If participation is decreasing, are there any steps to take to increase interest through marketing efforts, a change in the time/day of the program is offered, and a change in the format or instructor? If not, it may be time to discontinue the program. • Is there information contained in the participation feedback that can be used to improve the program? • Are cost recovery goals being met? If not, can fees be realistically increased? • Is there another provider of the program that is more suitable to offer it? If yes,the Department could provide referrals for its customers for the program it does not or is not willing or able to offer. • Is this program taking up facility space that could be used for expansion of more popular programs or new programs in demand by the community? C. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Current Circumstances and Trends The City adopts an annual budget that sets priorities, guides staff, and provides the primary resources to meet the parks and recreation needs of the community. The general fund is the primary operating fund and is comprised of property tax revenues, sales tax revenues, liquor sales revenue sharing, building permit revenue, and various intergovernmental sources. Other sources contributing to the general fund are grants,fees and charges generated by the Department. The Department is budgeted to receive 7.2 million in revenues in FY 2023 and anticipates 10.2 million in operating expenses and 18.6 million in capital expenditures. The historical budget data from FY2015 to FY2022, demonstrate higher cost recovery than most typical parks and recreation agencies across the United States (23.6%) and much higher that agencies of similar size to Meridian (19.5%). See Table 2: Meridian Parks and Recreation Actuals= 11111116 Revenues FY35 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 General Fund Revenues/Fees and Charges $ 709,637 $ 792,109 $ 1,099,976 $ 1,294,662 $ 1,614,513 $ 675,186 $ 2,674,996 $ 3,515,222 Expenditures FYl6 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Personnel $ 1,916,114 $ 2,136,695 $ 2,438,918 $ 2,605,195 $ 2,880,306 $ 3,060,439 $ 3,890,502 $ 4,269,309 Operating Expenses $ 1,574,742 $ 1,557,323 $ 1,729,652 $ 1,976,620 $ 2,243,481 $ 2,001,133 $ 3,342,527 $ 4,666,513 Total Expenses $ 3,490,856 $ 3,694,018 $ 4,168,571 $ 4,581,815 $ 5,123,788 $ 5,061,572 $ 7,233,029 $ 8,935,822 Total Cost Recovery 20% 21% 26% 28% 32% 13% 37% 39% Table 2:Meridian Parks and Recreation Revenues and Expenses(FY 2015 — FY 2022) RECREATIONPARKS AND Section Revenue and expense trends for the Department were greatly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 but have rebounded and continue to recover. Trends for non-capital budgets are shown in Figure 12. Expenses also continue to trend upward fueled by both recovery and 30 million in capital expenditures proposed in FY 2022 and FY 2023. The Western Ada Recreation District (WARD) and golf were included in the budget only in FY 2022 as part of a transition of the golf course to the City. Golf will be included in annual budgets moving forward.13 Meridian Parks and Recreation Actuals FY15 to FY 22 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 General Fund Revenues/Fees and Charges Operating Expenses Personnel Figure 12:Actuals FY15 — FY22 Measuring Department's Investment in Parks and Recreation There are several ways to gauge the Department's investment. Benchmarking against other similar communities can assist with planning and leadership decisions. However, because each community is different, benchmarking is not intended to be a sole tool for making management decisions. Operating Expenditures per Capita NRPA aggregates and reports annually in its Agency TYPICAL OPERATING Performance Review on typical agency operating EXPENDITURES expenditures per capita. In 2021,the typical parks PER CAPITA: and recreation agency similar in size to Meridian spent between $43.03 and $154.92 per capita or a median of $74.22� r„~ $74.22 for each resident. In 2022, the City spent $63.57 per resident This was lower than the median but within the YEAR typical range. Source:2022 NRPA Agency Local Comparison Performance Review It may also be helpful to consider the operating (non-capital) investment per capita made by other parks and recreation agencies in Idaho. While benchmarking analysis provides another perspective, it is important to acknowledge that each agency has different goals, standards and most important, methods of accounting. It may be helpful to compare other agencies in Idaho to best understand Meridian's investment. See Figure 13. 13 General fund cost recovery is calculated by dividing revenues and operating subsidy by operating expenditures • Organizationat IIII III IIII I g _ Selected Idaho Parks and Recreation Expenditures per Capita - 2022/23 ?00 150 100 50 0 Boise(237,446 Meridian[13347D Napa(96,825 population) Idaho falls(66898 Pocatello(57092 population) population] population) population) Figure 13:Selected Idaho Parks and Recreation Expenditures per Capita —2022/23 Allocating Resources and Setting Fees While all parks and recreation facilities, programs, and services are intended to improve the lives of community members, not all facilities, programs, and services should necessarily receive the same level of subsidy. In general,the more a facility, program, or service provides a community benefit to its community members,the more that service should be paid for by taxpayers through the use of general fund allocation. The more a facility, program, or service provides individual benefits,the more that service should be paid for through user fees. BerryDunn has long championed such a philosophy, demonstrated using the "Pyramid Resource Allocation Methodology." As part of this planning effort, BerryDunn is working to complete a methodology study for the City. The resource allocation/cost recovery pyramid is in Figure 14. This philosophy, when applied appropriately can assist the Department to set consistent fees and charges and best meet the needs of the Meridian community. Section Allocating Resources and Setting Fees While all parks and recreation facilities, programs, and services are intended to improve the lives of community members, not all facilities, programs, and services should necessarily receive the same level of subsidy. In general,the more a facility, program, or service provides a community benefit to its community members,the more that service should be paid for by taxpayers through the use of general fund allocation. The more a facility, program, or service provides individual benefits, the more that service should be paid for through user fees. BerryDunn has long championed such a philosophy, demonstrated using the "Pyramid Resource Allocation Methodology." As part of this planning effort, BerryDunn is working to complete a methodology study for the City. The resource allocation/cost recovery pyramid is in Figure 14. This philosophy, when applied appropriately can assist the Department to set consistent fees and charges and best meet the needs of the Meridian community. • Private or semi private lessons • Admission Based Rentals 5.Mostly ~ Merchandise&Vending fndividua! Tenant Facility Lease Benefit Lakeview Golf Club • Shelter Rental • Concession Leases 4.Considerable • Trips Individual Benefit • Adult Recreation Classes&Programs • Youth Recreation Classes&Programs 3.Balanced Community Swim Lessons and Individual Benefit . City Sports Leagues&Tournaments • Private or Semi-private Lessons • Admission Based Rentals • Merchandise&Vending 2. Considerable Community Benefit • Tenant Facility Lease • Lakeview Golf Club • Park&Pathway Use 1. Mostly Community Benefit • Community Special Events • Arts&Culture Programs • Volunteer Opportunities Figure 14: Resource Allocation Methodology Meridian Community Members Opinions about Fees and Charges The needs assessment survey asked respondents about their satisfaction with current fees for both facilities and programs and the impact on participation. More than half of the invite sample were unsure about fees for facilities and programs.Very few respondents (5%) believe the fees are too high. = CITY OF MERIDIAN, • • Organizationat Q 18:How do you feel about the current program and facility fees charged directly to you by Meridian Parks and Recreation? 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Fees are too high for the value received W6% _11% Fees are acceptable for the value received 32% -30% Facilities Fees are underpriced for the va l Lie received 12% 12% Don't know/unsure 59% 5T n= 294 652 Fees are too high for the value received 1496 Fees are acceptable for the Value received 35% 29% Programs Fees are underpriced for the value received 11�% 1% Don't know/unsure 59% 5696 n= 283 635 Figure 15:Meridian Residents Opinions Regarding Current Program and Facility Fees When asked about the potential impact of fee increases on participation, there was a lack of consensus on whether fee increases would impact participation, although a majority (54%) believe fee increases may impact their participation. Q 17:If fee increases were made for Meridian Parks,which of the following best describes the potential impact on your participation Invite Sample Open Link Overall Fee increases would not limit participation at all -25% 33% rl 29% Fee increases would limit participation somewhat 37% 45% 41% Fee increases would limit participation significantly -18% k273 Don't know/uncertain -20% 14% n= 300 573 Figure 16: Potential Impact on Participation from Fee Increases Managing Growth through Impact Fees There are three basic options to pay for growth. Either (1) existing residents pay for new growth through taxes or fees; (2) provide parks and recreation services at a lower level of service by absorbing growth into existing resources; or (3) developers and home builders pay for the impact of growth so that the growth pays its own way. This applies to both land on which to develop parks, and the actual costs for developing the space. Option 1 unfairly assigns responsibility for funding of growth. Option 2 creates a slippery slope, where the level of service(often determined as a percentage of developed acreage per 1,000 residents)will decrease over time, as new residential developments are added without contributing to the funding of new parks. This may lead to higher density of use or the need to travel further distances to gain access to parks. Option 3 allows growth to pay its own way in an equitable manner. Home builders typically include park development in the price of the homes, as they would other infrastructure costs. In line with the City's 2019 methodology study and 67-8204 1000 SO Ft.or less $781 (16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, park impact 1001 to 1500 SO Ft. $1,361 fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per dwelling. In Table 1501 to 2500 SO Ft. $1,770 3, single family residential dwelling units are considered by 2501 to 3200 SO Ft. $2,098 square feet and multi-family units are charged the same fee 3201 SO Ft.or more $2,447 and calculated based on the total square feet of the building/ number of units. Although an option, no commercial impact Table 3:2023 Park Impact Fees fees are collected (police and fire facilities both collect a commercial impact fee). This fee is intended to provide both park land and development of new park improvements. Section These fees are charged per the City fee schedule and are not escalated resulting from increased cost of construction or land. The 2022 methodology study calculations may be understating the cost to provide new park space in 2022 and in the future without applying an annual escalator. Cash flow from impact fees can be anticipated in Table 4. Anticipated Funds from Impact Fees Average Number of Low Fees Median Fees High Fees Population Population Household Anticipated (Based on$781 (Based on$1,614 (Based on$2,447 Growth Size New Dwelling collected per per dwelling unit) per dwelling unit) Units dwelling unit) 2021 124,700 N/A 2.97 N/A - - - 2026 142,522 17,732 2.97 5,970 $4,662,570 $9,345,060 $14,608,590 2060 197,463 54,941 2.97 18,498 $14,446,938 $29,855,772 $45,264,606 Table 4:Anticipated Funds from Impact Fees through 2050 Funding Mechanisms Availabie to the Department BerryDunn has compiled a list of potential funding sources and strategies for public parks and recreation identified through over 26 years of consulting with agencies across the United States. Thirty- nine new potential funding opportunities were identified as funding sources the Department could or would consider in the future. The strategies were identified as potential options for new or expanded revenue, and cost savings strategies. Traditional Parks & Recreation Operations and Capital Development Funding Sources There are a variety of mechanisms that local governments can employ to provide services and to make public improvements. Parks and recreation operating, and capital development funding typically comes from conventional sources such as sales, use, and property tax referenda voted upon by the community, along with developer exactions. Operating funds are typically capped by legislation; may fluctuate based on the economy, public spending, or assessed valuation; and may not always keep up with inflationary factors. In the case of capital development, "borrowed funds" sunset with the completion of loan repayment and are not available to carry over or re-invest without voter approval. Explained below are the salient points of traditional funding sources. Many of these strategies may be currently in use to some extent by your agency. Alternative Operations and Capital Development Funding Sources Alternative funding sources include a variety of different or nonconventional public-sector strategies for diversifying the funding base beyond traditional tax-based support. The following is a list of known industry funding practices, potential sources, and strategies, as compiled by BerryDunn. Some of the strategies might currently be used by your agency, but they might not be used to maximum effectiveness or capacity. Those that might not currently be used by your agency should be considered for a projects or the operation's specific relevance. NOTE:Not every funding mechanism on this list may be allowable by law,as the laws,regulations,statutes,ordinances,and systems of governance vary from City to City,county to county,and state to state.The authority to put forth referenda or institute exactions must be researched for validity within your City and your state,as this list is comprised of the financial practices from across the nation.Some referenda are passed by simple majority of those who vote,while others require a larger percentage to pass.In certain circumstances,referenda are passed by the majority of eligible voters versus just those who vote. = CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO • We Are Organizational & Financial Assessment Key Findings Observations and staff feedback were considered to determine if the current organizational structure and financial investments were satisfactory. The analysis included the observations and assessments from this analysis and resulted in the following observations: 1. The City invests less than the Median number of positions compared to typical agencies the size of Meridian. They need to add 5 to 6 positions in order to come in line with typical staffing. 2. Population growth will require additional positions in addition to those identified to maintain the current level of service. 3. The number of positions dedicated to administration and to parks maintenance and operations are below what would typically be expected. Staffing for recreation program areas is often limited to one employee. This will create a staffing shortage as demand grows and new programs are introduced. 4. The Department does an excellent job managing cost recovery 5. The recent resource allocation and cost recovery study will greatly assist the Department to allocate resources and set fees in the future 6. Just under half of the needs assessment survey respondents suggested that fees are acceptable or underpriced for both facilities and programs.A very small percent of survey respondents thought fees were too high. 7. 70% of needs assessment survey respondents reported that fee increases may impact participation in Department sponsored activities 8. The City's investment in operating the parks and recreation system was slightly lower than what may be expected for an agency serving a similar population but was within the typical range. This investment was among the lowest compared to other selected Idaho parks and recreation agencies. 9. The City's impact fee methodology was updated in 2022 and the fees were escalated for increases in construction and land costs. The fee study was adopted by City Council in November 2022. 10. Among many opportunities to fund the Department, 39 options were identified that the Department would consider or possibly consider using in the future. These options were provided as a staff document. UPDATEPARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN Section D. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Maintenance and Operations The consultants assessed parks maintenance and operations practices to assist the Parks and Recreation Department in providing safe, clean, and green parks,trails, and open space. The evaluation, analysis, and recommendations are intended to identify efficiencies and opportunities to help the Department meet its maintenance and operational objectives. 1.0 Investment in Parks Maintenance and Operations Proper investment in maintenance of parkland can slow the depreciation of parkland, increase public perception of Department operations, and increase property values surrounding parks. Poor parks maintenance can lead to increased crime, vandalism, and increased renovation costs. 1.1 Operating Expenditures Per Acre One way to measure the City's investment in parks and recreation is to look at the investment per acre of park and non-park space. Currently,the Department manages and maintains 530 acres of developed and undeveloped park land and open space,trails, and other sites. The Department investment for maintenance (annual net cost after revenue) is $1,952,204 (2021/2022 operating budget) or$3,683 per acre. Typical agencies may spend from $3,096 (low)to $14,793 (high), with a median of$7,449 per acre of park and non-park space. 1.2 Residents Per Park Park maintenance costs typically increase with the density of use in public spaces. As such,the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) metrics (2021 NRPA Agency Performance Review) suggest that a typical park system serving a population between 100,000 and 250,000 would provide between one park per 2,205 people on the lower quartile to 5,854 on the upper quartile. The City provides one park per 4,992 people compared to a national median of 3,170. While the City provides parks within the typical range for communities its size, serving a denser population than the median creates additional budget pressure for the Department. People per park is calculated based on the 2021 population (124,790) divided by Meridian's 25 parks. 1.3 Managing Growth In November 2022, DP Guthrie, LLP completed an update to the City's impact fee methodology that describes the potential residential growth and need for additional park land, park development, and recreation facilities. The study projected that the population would increase by 38,433 to 171,903 in 2032. Based on this growth,the study concluded that an additional 87 acres of developed parks will be needed to support the increased population at a similar level of service as Meridian residents enjoy today. Applying the current cost to maintain an acre of land, $3,683 per acre, (current budget/ current acres of developed parks), an additional $320,421 will be needed to continue to maintain the park system.This will require both full-time and seasonal positions (supervisory and non-supervisory), operating and maintenance equipment, and supplies. A majority of the growth is anticipated to occur by 2026. These estimates are based on costs in 2022 without escalation for inflation. = CITY OF MERIDIAN, • • We Are Organizationat & Financiat Assessment 2.0 Use of - • . and Pathways The needs assessment survey identified community needs and desires regarding park use and related facilities and amenities.The survey revealed that 96% of survey respondents rated pathways/trails as having the greatest need,followed by picnic shelters at 83% and playgrounds at 75%. See Figure 17. Importance to the community implies a need for an appropriate level of park maintenance. Q 13:What are the the greatest needs for indoor and outdoor faci Iities to be added,expanded,or improved in Meridian over the next 5 or 10 years? Indoor Facilities: ■:-oc ae an mw a •Invite sample Only ■z �3 Percent Responding ■4 Rating Category Avg. n= 1&2 3 48.5 ■s-verym,o.eaM communiryrrecreamna 3.9 273 0 16% 17% 67% Indmragnat-lady 38 268 12L_ 18% 18% 64% Fieldnan&gymna.rmr- 36 257 �21% 25% �54% Perf-mgarrsaesc 3.3 265 �30% 27% �� Ice rink 3.0 265 38% -28% Figure 17:Importance of Facilities and Amenities,Recreation Programs,and Services to Meridian Satisfaction2.1 • Park Amenities The survey demonstrated that the community is very satisfied with the quality of the parks, which reflects on park maintenance practices. On a scale of 1 (not at all satisfied)to 5 (very satisfied),the results from the combined random and invite sample rated playgrounds (4.0), picnic shelters (3.9), splash pads (3.7), and ballfields (3.7)the highest. When asked to rank their top three opportunities for improvement, only 27% of survey respondents suggested improvements in park maintenance as a priority. See Figures 18 and 19. Q 10:Please rate how you think the followingfaciIities!amenities and programs/services are currently meeting the needs of the community. Facilities and Amenities: "All Only Rating CaletjM Invite Sample Open Link Overall Playgrounds t• 4.1 40 4.0 nanr lds(basabaluso6bak,et) 40 3.6 ti 3.8 Athletics Ids(sir,la-,footbal( 4.0 3.4 3.7 Picnk snene. t 38 39 39 nog parks 3.8 33 3.5 splash pads 3.7 i 3.6 t. 3.7 colfCon- 36 3.3 35 Tennismurts t 3.5 3.4 3.5 Outdoor basketball marls 3.5 3.3 3.4 Communityrreereatm-Tla .t 3.4 'l 3.0 t 32 Pnth-ysnrnd� i 34 t 32 33 M-r gym space 3.3 2.9 3.1 Sximming p-64,q-fi,r-ilia 32 t 2.7 t 2.9 Rodengrourds 29 2.3 26 Figure 18: Needs Met for Facilities and Amenities in Meridian RECREATIONPARKS AND Section1 Q 16:What top three community issues should the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation focus on improving? Invite Sample Open Link Overall Pathwayconnec w 12 47% IM 44% 46% Third Rank Land pro .tionfaoqu,tm tMR 32% 9sc 29% ®i. 31% ■Seeend Rank Fli tRank Maintenance of parl6andfaciltl— � 9"b 31% � ]°i, 23% � 27% Figure 19:Top Three Community Issues for Suggested Improvement ' 3.0 Park Maintenance Staffing Resources The Department provides 18 full-time positions to operate and maintain the parks and facilities. The positions are overseen by the Parks Superintendent who is supported in the daily operation of the parks and golf course by the Park Maintenance Manager and Golf Course Superintendent. Three positions are dedicated to maintaining the turf, greens, t-boxes,fairways, and other horticultural practices at the golf course. In addition, the Parks Maintenance Manager is responsible for 11.5 seasonal/casual Full-Time equivalents (FTE) positions. The seasonal employees are limited to eight consecutive months of work and at times are offered extended positions through local temporary employment agencies. The budget for seasonal/casual maintenance positions is approximately$400,000 per year. Staff work five-day-per-week schedules, rotating weekend work shifts. Daily maintenance, trash removal, project work, restroom maintenance, etc. are completed daily. The Department uses SOME limited contracted services to support some of the smaller operations and tasks. Due to COVID-19 and other factors, hourly wages for the seasonal/casual workforce have been significantly increased (30%) over the past two years to attract and retain staff. As a result, the budget in 2023 is anticipated to support four less FTEs than prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. While the maintenance team continues to work efficiently "doing more with less",the increased workloads on existing staff may not be sustainable, leading to additional challenges related to employee retention. Restoration of the seasonal staff budget (-$120,000) due to the increased wages is encouraged. 3.1 Lakeview Golf Ctub The full-time golf course staff are supplemented by a seasonal budget of$58,000 per year. Seasonal employees perform mowing and other outdoor maintenance. Employees are offered a golf benefit to maintain and attract college students, retired community members, etc. = CITY OF MERIDIAN, • Who Organizationat 4.0 Park Maintenance Team Responsibilities The Park Maintenance Team is responsible for 92 sites that include neighborhood, community, sports, and regional parks, seven miles of pathways, parking lots,tree wells, public works sites, medians, corridors, slopes, downtown locations, fire stations, drains, and other areas. A majority of time is spent maintaining the Department's parks. Additional responsibilities include: • Snow and ice control at all City facilities • Downtown trees, benches • Downtown holiday decorating/floats • Security camera systems in parks • Downtown seasonal banners • Welcome to Meridian monuments and signs • Downtown flower program • Downtown tree program The Department manages a joint use agreement with West Ada School District that includes maintenance of a very well used 3-acre play area at Hillsdale Elementary that requires significant maintenance. The Department is assisted through additional partnerships that include Meridian Co-op Gardeners, West Ada School District, Police Activities League, Meridian Youth Baseball, etc. Support4.1 • Recreation Events The Park Maintenance Team's support of special events setup/teardown is generally around 650 to 800 work hours per year. Permitted events (non-City sponsored) present a significant level of work for the Maintenance Team during the June/July months. Events held and permitted in the parks require the team to prepare and clean the parks and facilities for each event. 4.2 Maintaining Restrooms Year-round restrooms include 150+ stalls and are locked and unlocked on timers. Restroom maintenance requires a significant proportion of the daily workload. 4.3 Maintaining Athletic Facitities The Park Maintenance Team maintains 25 diamond and 13 rectangle playing fields, some with shared responsibility with a private little league organization that completes day-of game field preparation. The Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB) private organization works closely with the Department to help ensure adequate rest periods for the fields. It appears the Department has adequate resources to maintain the playing fields. 4.4 Nuisance Behavior In many communities across the United States, issues due to vandalism and homelessness are placing an ever-growing burden on park maintenance team workloads. The impacts from nuisance behavior are relatively minimal in Meridian. RECREATIONPARKS AND Section I , I .5 Park Maintenance Standards andPerformance The Department does not have a published maintenance standard, although the parks all receive a high level of consistent maintenance, regardless of classification. Both written and adopted maintenance standards and performance measures are encouraged to help with appropriate and timely park maintenance. Performance Measures The Department is encouraged to develop S.M.A.R.T. (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time Bound) performance measures in the following and other areas related to core parks maintenance functions. Examples of potential measures are included for reference (in italics). • Litter control —All litter should generally be removed from the parks daily within 24 hours. Litter control minimum service may be two to three times per week in very low-use areas. • Graffiti—Should be removed within 48 hours/24 hours if offensive language/graphics. The City should maintain an inventory of replacement signs. • Repairs to assets—Should be made within 48 hours and signs posted closing an amenity needing repair. Repairs to all elements should be done immediately when problems are discovered provided that replacement parts and technicians are available to accomplish the job. When disruptions to the public might be major and the repair is not critical, repairs may be postponed to a time that is least disruptive to the usage patterns. • Restroom maintenance and service—Should be completed daily, each day a restroom is open to the public, and as needed based on permits. • Park inspections— Thorough inspections should be completed weekly;staff should inspect restrooms and playgrounds daily. • Irrigation — Turf should have a green appearance except for dedicated natural areas. Priority areas for irrigation should be reviewed annually. Park Maintenance Standards for Quality Parks and Facilities Some sample maintenance standards are in Appendix A of the plan and are meant to be a starting point for the Department to review and consider as a list of basic maintenance standards for all parks and recreational facilities. Examples of park components and amenities to develop maintenance standards for include: • Drinking Fountains 0 Bleachers • Signage 0 Lights • Ornamental Plants and Trees 0 Restrooms • Walkways and Trails 0 Portable Toilets • Trash Receptacles 0 Playgrounds • Fencing 0 Play Equipment • Security and Exterior Lights 0 Picnic Areas and Shelters • General Use Turf Areas 0 Grills • Athletic Use Turf Areas • Tennis Courts • Athletic Facilities and Competitive Play 0 Outdoor Basketball Courts Fields 0 Benches • Irrigation 0 Pickleball Court • Open Space Areas • Organizationat 5.0 Sustainable Equipment and Efficiencies The Department has invested in sustainable technology over the past five years in bottle fill drinking fountains, LED lights, etc. The Department may consider a potential future fleet conversion to hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric vehicles (EVs). This would require an investment in charging stations. • 1 Key Eindings 1. The Parks Maintenance Team does an excellent job maintaining parks and grounds. The community is very satisfied with park maintenance. 2. The City's investment in parks maintenance and operation appears reasonable compared to other agencies serving similar sized communities. 3. The Department has sustained a budget reduction to its seasonal and casual budget in the past few years as a result of increased wages. An increase of approximately$120,000 per year in the seasonal budget is needed to restore the Department's level of maintenance service. 4. Growth will necessitate additional park acres and positions that the Department should consider(frontline and administrative positions) as population increases. 5. Growth will also require supervisory positions to maintain effective spans of control. 6. Written park maintenance standards may assist the Department's effectiveness. 'r x. PARKS AND k a " Nam:= RECREATION 5. 0 PATHWAYS ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATIONS A. INTRODUCTION This section is intended as an update to the Meridian Pathways Master Plan (Adopted in 2007 and previously amended in January of 2010) and a tool to further aid in the implementation of that plan. It does not suggest any significant changes to proposed expansion of the pathway system as outlined in the original plan, but rather seeks to accomplish the following objectives: • Quantify the impacts of pathway system expansion in terms of cost for ongoing maintenance, given the significant proposed increase to pathway mileage at plan build-out. • Establish guidelines for what portion of the pathway system is appropriate and sustainable for the City to maintain. • Establish City priorities for near-term pathway implementation that will have the greatest impact on connectivity. • Propose changes to existing policy that will facilitate ongoing expansion and designate maintenance responsibilities so as to meet the needs of the City,the development community,and other stakeholders. L< mow 62 City of Meridian, Idaho Pathways Assessment B. PATHWAY SYSTEM OVERVIEW EXISTING MULTI-USE PATHWAYS Total Existing Pathways in Meridian = 50.65 miles Some pathways were built by City of Meridian, most were conditioned/built with development Above number includes: • Multi-use pathway within parks • 10' wide asphalt pathways within City limits and 10' sidewalks designated as pathway, does not include street crossings, no micro paths Of the above number, the City owns and maintains 15.64 miles Not maintained by City of Meridian (Remainder of multi-use pathways) 35.01 miles RECENT PATHWAY DEVELOPMENT Developer pathways constructed within the past 2 years 4 -4.5 miles last 2 years— Kim's estimate only(mostly NW&S Meridian) City Miles added in 2021 (Fairview Ave Sidewalk) 0.11 miles ^both of these line items included in 50.65 mile figure above PENDING CITY PROJECTS City Pathway Infill Projects Currently in Development 1.75 miles • Creason Pathway Connection (contract awarded,const to start in June 2022) • Linder Road Infill (out to bid,construction Summer 2022) • Locust Grove Infill (out to bid,construction Summer 2022) • Five Mile Pathway—between Ten Mile and Black Cat Roads (in final design phase) ADDITIONAL PROPOSED MILEAGE Proposed Multi-Use Pathways per current adopted pathways plan 135 miles Additional Proposed Pathways (working layer/not yet adopted by Council) 20 miles ^within current City Area of Impact TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED 180.65 miles MULTI-USE PATHWAYS AT BUILDOUT Assuming a static scenario of: • Adopted pathways only • No pathway plan changes from today's date C. IMPORTANCE OF PATHWAYS/NEED Pathways make communities more livable by helping to reduce reliance on the automobile, decrease vehicular demand on roadways, and encourage community health and connectivity. A connective pathway system has the potential to improve the environment and mitigate for traffic congestion. Additionally, pathways provide ongoing opportunities to promote physical, social, and mental health. Beyond connecting people to places, pathways also provide ongoing opportunities to educate the community through informative signage, highlight historical events through wayfinding, and allows us to connect interpersonally as a community. Throughout the needs assessment and outreach phase of this planning effort, community members consistently rated pathways as a high priority when given opportunity to comment via stakeholder group, survey, and/or public meetings. This reflects a national trend wherein pathways are increasingly important to communities. While Meridian has identified an extensive pathway system for development, connectivity between existing pathways and proposed pathways continues to be a challenge Some of the challenges for pathway connectivity are due to existing major roadways that present potential barriers to pedestrian traffic, and existing development that occurred prior to required pedestrian pathway connections. Stakeholders The City of Meridian understands that in order to achieve their pathways mater plan goal and create a connective community through the implementation of a pathway network, stakeholder relations are key.Various stakeholders have been identified as follows as potential opportunities for collaboration for supporting the City of Meridian Pathways Master Plan. Irrigation Districts Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District— Major Stakeholder. Settlers Irrigation District— Fewer land holdings in Meridian. The Boise Project • West Ada School District History of successfully partnering with the school district. Joint use of school facilities plays a key role in filling recreation demand for ball fields and active recreation facilities. School properties are important when it comes to making connections, and offer opportunities for safer crossings and connections,further off(or outside of) public rights- of-way. • Developers Residential Subdivision Developers Commercial Developments Private Sector Development (religious institutions, etc.) • Landowners adjacent to waterways that have been identified as a pathway opportunity • Homeowners'Associations (HOAs) (residential, commercial, institutional) • City of Meridian— Building Department • ACHD— Right-of-Way Road sections and required sidewalks and their widths • ITD—where applicable • Railroads Potential for sharing existing rights-of-way that can achieve connection on a more regional level. CITY OF MERIDIAN, • D. PROGRESS UPDATE/POLICIES IMPLEMENTED Since adoption of the original Meridian Pathways Master Plan, significant progress has been made toward implementation. Much of this has focused on the establishment of policy and planning practices around pathway development that will lay the groundwork for greater connectivity moving forward. Policy and Procedural Improvements Achieved Since Approval of Original Plan • Entitlements process for development now requires dedicated easements for pathways and pedestrian connections that are maintained by the respective HOA's • Plan review for all new development must be routed through the Pathways Project Manager for design input and approval, in addition to other departments as required. • Developers are required to provide better documentation of construction standards/as- builts for pathways that may later be deeded to the City. Developers must submit the City of Meridian approved pathway pavement section during the design review and preliminary plat submittal. • Standard specifications, City provided details, and notes for pathway construction have been developed in conjunction with Meridian Public Works—similar to a performance specification. • Pathway entitlement is no longer a part of the Development Agreement. • Expectation has been established among developers that working with the City to provide pathway connections will be a standard project requirement. The City has seen improved cooperation and general acknowledgement from the development community that pathways benefit and add value to their final product. • Larger planter widths adjacent to pathways will allow for mature tree growth and shade for users during the summer months. c-t PARKS AND - - t RECREATION Section 5.0 E. OPPORTUNITIES/RECOMMENDATIONS PerspectiveMaintain a Regional• Emphasize the need to look beyond Meridian to neighboring communities and think in terms of regional connections to Boise River Greenbelt, Eagle, Nampa, Caldwell, Star, and Kuna. The pending acquisition of Margaret Aldape Park presents an opportunity for Meridian to connect to the Boise River Greenbelt system. This will provide connection to the rest of the Treasure Valley on a regional level to the east. Connections to adjacent municipalities should be explored and encouraged to develop a seamless transition between the various agencies. Develop destination nodes along the pathways that will guide a user from pathway section to pathway section. Integrate linear parks and community gathering places along the pathway network. This should be looked at from a hierarchy of uses in coordination with the pathway hierarchy. Develop a story and identity for the pathways and relate that to the community. Create community agency and care for the pathways through community art. • Use proximity to schools, when possible, and take advantage of existing signaled crossings in school zones. Provide pedestrian connections between all schools and pathway system. Safe Routes to Schools have already been mapped. Examine these in greater detail and adjust as necessary. Find/create connections between multi-use pathways and schools. �s Ae CITY _f fir. OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO Pathways Assessment Equity and Neighborhood Connections Providing equitable opportunities, spaces, and connections within the City of Meridian though the pathway systems will create a healthier community. • Identify areas that are more than a 10-minute walk to a City pathways network to create areas of focused pathway development • Provide development incentives for infill areas that create a 5-minute walk to a City pathway network • Require wayfinding signage for developments that show distance and direction to another connected pathway. • Identify community areas that are underserved by the pathway network and link schools with the Saft Routes program. • Identify ADA accessible routes within the GIS system and make it accessible for the public. • Establish neighborhood pathway partnerships and community representatives. • Identify key areas that need pathways for connectivity. • Identify areas that are more than a 10-minute walk to a pathway system and incentives pathway implementation for equitable use of the pathways. • Provide wayfinding: educational, distance to next pathway system, and pathway names • Increase the planter width adjacent to the pathways to encourage health and mature tree grown and canopy cover. Subdivision Development • Continue to work with developers to dedicate pathway easements and make strong pedestrian connections through the use of themed wayfinding signage. • Pedestrian connections shall be identified, approved, and preserved prior to development. • Coordinate with developers during the entitlements process to allow alternative routes through developments, regardless of ditch or waterway location (if applicable). Require a pathways inspection prior to issuing approval of substantial completion. Existing Rights-of-Way Where pathways must be integrated with public rights-of-way, revise street sections to provide for wider sidewalks and greater separation from major roadways, if possible. As-Builts and Documentation • The Building Department shall notify the Parks & Pathways Project Manager of all pathways, once built. Institute mechanisms for better post-construction reporting and documentation. Section 5.0 F. KEY STAKEHOLDERS FOR PATHWAY IMPLEMENTATION In recent years,the City has made significant progress in terms of policy to further development of the pathway system as pertains to involvement by other property owners and stakeholders.This momentum must continue, and relationships further developed, with the following key stakeholders. Irrigation Districts • Due to the linear nature of waterways, Irrigation Districts (especially Nampa-Meridian) are key to advancing connectivity of the Meridian pathways plan. It is imperative that the City continues to partner with irrigation districts relative to the following challenges: • Pathway development along existing canals, irrigation ditches, and laterals needs to be addressed at a more comprehensive level. • Crossings present a special difficulty in that many waterways do not emerge at intersections where pedestrian crossings exist and are safely articulated. For example, it is not acceptable for pathways to emerge at the edge of a 45 mph collector road with minimal shoulder and no proximity to an intersection for safe crossing. • In the past, irrigation districts have refused pathway proposals prior to any constructive discussion regarding their development. Both parties now have a history of working together and must continue to fine-tune this partnership as each new pathway segment is implemented. Developers • Residential and commercial developments present challenges when it comes to providing pathway easements. The City must work closely with developers during the planning phases, as it can be prohibitive to accomplish these connections after the fact. • Allow for development incentives for pathways with added amenities and larger open space dedication G. IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE PRIORITIES Because so many miles of pathway have been identified for development per the Pathways Master Plan, it is recommended that City resources focus on implementation and maintenance of the following major components of the system. Once a strong framework is established, users will enjoy greater connectivity, and secondary pathways can then tie into and expand the reach of the overall system. The following pathways have been identified as high priorities for Capital Improvement Projects and maintenance funds. This is intended as a general guideline for resource allocation by the City, as timing and location of private development may catalyze construction of lower priority pathways by others. ProposedHigh Priority Pathways Existing Miles Five-Mile Creek Pathway 2.37 8.64 11.01 Ten-Mile Creek Pathway 2.03 9.00 11.03 Rail-with-Trail 0 8.08 8.08 TOTAL PROPOSED 6.71 28.73 30.18 Miles Table 5:Capital Improvement Projects = CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO Pathways Assessment Regional • . of Rail-with-Trail This proposed pathway will have a significant impact on regional connectivity, as it will encompass a 22- mile right of way, with eight of those miles passing through the City of Meridian. The combination Rail- with-Trail section, as proposed, will run between the historic railroad depots in Boise and Nampa. Pathways Hierarchy(see details for additional information and requirements) • Canal Pathway o 10' wide paved pathways detached from a roadway for the shared use for nonmotorized users • Residential Pathway o 10' wide paved pathway adjacent to a roadway with a 6'-8'wide landscape buffer between the roadway and the pathway for nonmotorized users • Rail-With-Trail Pathway o 10'-14' wide paved pathway located within the Union Pacific Railroad Corridor right-of-way from Nampa to Boise • Micro Pathway A narrow paved pathway(minimum 5') providing connectivity to destinations such as school or through residential developments • Unpaved or Soft Surface Pathway 3'-8'wide unpaved pathway constructed of gravel, dirt, crushed aggregate, or other semi- pervious surface • Sidewalk 4'-8' wide concrete pathway adjacent to a roadway, either attached or detached, to serve pedestrians and wheelchair-mobile individuals,typical of residential subdivisions. • Bicycle Lane 4'-6' wide designated area on the roadway, typically major arterial and collector roadways, located to the right of vehicular traffic migration and identified through striping, signage, pavement markings as designated through the Ada County Highway District. Development of the Meridian Pathways Master Plan and network will provide an added benefit to the neighboring jurisdictions and collaboration with these jurisdictions will be crucial for the overall success of a regional pathway system for the grater Meridian area. Developing pathway connections with adjacent jurisdictions and create a bridge program that will aide in creating a seamless transition between the pathways at the jurisdictional boundaries. Other organizations such as COMPASS, regional partners, and federal grant programs should be considered at the beginning of the planning and implementation process. • - ' • • • - • It is anticipated that implementation of this pathway will be driven largely by private developers, with ongoing maintenance provided by Homeowners'Associations. It is recommended that there be a clear hierarchy of pathways that apply for various situations. Determine where to have a concrete versus asphalt pathway installed based on what the use of each type of pathway will be. Section 5.0 H. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS FOR PLAN BUILD-OUT Even with a mandate to focus resources on the development of a few high-priority segments, cost to construct these pathways will be considerable. Pathways have been identified as a major priority for the City of Meridian but given the demands on public funds for other recreational facilities,the cost for build-out of the pathway system must necessarily be considered within a greater funding context and borne, in large part, by private sector development. It is recommended that the City seek donor or sponsorship for pathway implementation and funding where possible such as state,federal, public, and private, corporate entities. Additional funding through annual budgetary allotment is also recommended to fund current and future maintenance projects. I. PATHWAY MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Implications of System Expansion on Maintenance With growth in recent years,the City has taken advantage of opportunities to develop pathway connections through proposed developments.Verbiage around these development agreements continues to evolve, but in the past, situations have arisen in which the City has been deeded ownership (and associated maintenance) of a pathway not constructed to City standards. It is essential to establish mechanisms for construction documentation of pathways that will guarantee new segments are built to City standards, not only to ensure public safety, but to also minimize maintenance impacts over time.A City inspection should be required prior to issuing substantial completion to ensure that it has been installed per the City of Meridian's approved pathway section details. Need for Shared Responsibility As time goes on, even with high standards for construction,the pathway system will grow beyond the ability of the City to maintain it. Ultimate responsibility for maintenance of the pathway system must be shared between the City and private landowners(often Homeowners' associations). It is recommended that the City transition to requiring that maintenance of future pathways implemented as part of subdivision developments be borne by private stakeholders and adjacent landowners. It is also recommended that the City establish a timeline for maintenance inspections and replacement activities. Asphalt inspected every five years after installation, concrete inspected every 10 years after installation, and recreational trails inspected every three years.This information should be updated in the City's GIS system so that it is explicitly known what needs inspection and when replacement will be required. Evaluate pathway successes and those that need improvement to keep refining the implementation and development process. Pathways Assessment Linear Rights-of-Way/Canal Pathways Irrigation district requirements for pathway development: City acts as single point of contact City must maintain pathway segments or coordinate maintenance with private sector/HOAs • City must enforce irrigation district requirements with other parties Individual licensing agreement recommendations: • Require HOAs to maintain pathways, in perpetuity, to standards for safe public use and established landscape aesthetics. • Incorporate strong wording in these agreements to make clear to private developers that the City will no longer assume long-term maintenance of pathways. • Shall institute mechanisms for enforcement and oversight. • Establish neighborhood pathway partnerships and community representatives. Replacement Cycle for Paved Pathways Clear delineation of maintenance responsibility is a necessity, owing to the limited life span of asphalt pavement (30 years on average). In order for pathways to remain safe and well- maintained as the system ages, a portion of paved pathway segments will require periodic re-paving on an ongoing basis. In other words, similar to the way City trees are pruned on a five-year cycle, so must pathways be resurfaced on a periodic maintenance rotation. It is recommended that there be an updated master plan in GIS that show existing pathways and their surfaces as well as proposed pathways that Meridian will build/maintain. They system will allow for tracking and budgeting for future maintenance activities. PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE - A - I . ,c s Section 5.0 Life Cycle Repaving Costs Assuming a total pathway system comprised of 133 miles of pathway that require re-paving every 30 years, estimated minimum cost to repave the entire system is as follows: 133 miles of pathway x$369,600/mile = $49.2 million every 30 years or = $1,638,560 annually Additional pathways proposed in the Master Plan are desired by the community and essential to the ultimate success of the plan. However, because this increased mileage carries significant cost implications, maintenance of the system in its entirety will ultimately lie beyond the resources of the City. Assumptions: Average lifespan of pathway segment is 30 years. Priority pathways include: Five Mile Creek Pathway. Ten Mile Creek Pathway. Meridian Loop. Rail-With-Trail. Connective Pathways to Existing Greenbelt. Relevant Studies and Planning Efforts The following studies, completed since the Pathways Master Plan (adopted 2007; amended 2010, 2012) should be considered relative to the existing plan and recommendations contained in this chapter. • Arterial Crossing Study. • Union Pacific Railroad/Rail with Trail Study(January 2015). • Destination Downtown. Information gathering and updates to downtown streetscapes. Includes detailed pavement sections, also standard notes and specifications. Summary Significant progress has been made toward implementation of the current Pathways Master Plan. Because connectivity continues to be a challenge, it is recommended that the City focus implementation efforts on a few priority pathways. Beyond that, given the extent of the proposed system and an understanding of the projected costs for build-out and ongoing maintenance, it becomes clear that these demands will, over time, exceed the resources of the City. Moving forward, it will be crucial to shift some of the construction burden to private developers, who will typically retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for these pathways, so they may better contribute to the sustainability and success of the overall system. Pathways staff will need to expand as the pathway network expands. Inspections of new construction and maintenance inspections will take time. Increased staff will be needed to review and approve all plans that include pathways. Staff will need to expand to maintain amenities and trash receptacles, painted striping where applicable, weed abatement, surface patches and repairs, etc. There is also a need to create an updated master plan that show existing pathways and their surfaces as well as proposed pathways that Meridian will build and maintain. 6mO WHAT WE HAVE - PARKS FACILITIES INVENTORY ASSESMENT A. STEP 1: INVENTORY - WHAT 00 WE HAVE? In November 2021, the consultant team used the Geo-Referenced Amenities Standards Process (GRASP)®- IT audit tool in each park and facility to count and score the function and quality of: • Components — things you go to a park to use, examples: playground, tennis court, picnic shelter. • Modifiers — things that enhance comfort and convenience, examples: shade, drinking fountains, restrooms. Evaluators assigned a quality value (between 0 and 3) to each park site, component, and modifiers, allowing the comparison of sites and analysis of the overall level of service provided by the Meridian park system. (more detail on GRASP® found in Appendix A) 1� i PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 73 Section 6.0 Assessment Summary Observations based on visits to each park or facility include the following: • Parks are very consistent across the board. Well-maintained with high standards. Restrooms are very clean and well-maintained. • Noted: most of the parks have public art. Implementation of a previous plan recommendation plan to create an identity for each individual park. • Addition of bike repair stations in many parks. • Many of the parks can benefit aesthetically from increased use of berms and landforms. • Turf conditions are excellent. • There is a high priority to plant trees in many of the parks Figure 20:System Inventory Examples(right) Photos depict various examples and conditions from those visits. 7 CITY OF • InventoryWhat We Have - Parks Facilities Keith Bird Legacy Park N City of Meridian Legend A 0 Meridian Parks O Component [3 City of Meridian O Meridian Existing Pathway,Existing west Ada School District QSchool Proposed Pathway,Existing western Ada Recreation District O YMCA On Street Route,Existing Boise Library District Alternative Route,Existing BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Other Micro Path,Existing F1� Meridian City Limit _ 5 Cr � C157 * *C1' 1� CIII % C-145 f "��4 C 192 i� Keith Bird Legacy ark a t C147 �. j - l� t 4 Source:Esri,Maxar,GeoE e,E-arthstar Geographies,CNES/ irbus DS, USDA,USES,AeroGRID,IGN,and the GiS User Community RECREATIONffF PARKS AND Section 6.0 Keith Bird Legacy Park Address: 3737 W Lost Rapids Dr, Park Overview: Park Cumulative Scores: Meridian, ID 83646 Newer construction. The park is typical for GIS Acres 7.50 Meridian neighborhood park. Lots of seating,nice 52 Owner City of Meridian amenities Classification:Neighborhood GRASP® GRASP® Community Neighborhood Inventory Date: 11/17/2021 Score score Comfort and Convenience Scores: 2 -Design and Ambiance l-1 1 -Trail Connection 2 -Dog Pick-Up Station 2 -Park Access 3 -Seating 0 -Seasonal Plantings 2 -Bike Parking 2 -Parking 2 -Picnic Tables 2 -Shade 2 -Drinking Fountains 2 -Restrooms 2 -BBQ Grills 2 -Ornamental Plantings 2 -Security Lighting Components: MAP ID N C Qty Lights Observations Score Score Basketball, Practice C157 2 2 1 Half court Fitness Area C146 2 2 1 Loop Walk C144 2 2 1 Open Turf C192 2 2 1 Other C193 2 2 2 Game tables in the plaza with checkers or chess board PARCEL L155 2 2 1 Playground, Local C145 2 2 1 Public Art C191 2 2 1 Sculpture Rectangular Field, Large C147 2 2 1 Shelter, Large C156 2 2 1 N Score=Neighborhood Score/C Score=Community Score/Qty=Quantity Parks Summary Table 6 shows the Meridian parks organized by classification. The table indicates acres and the number of components located within each park. € s u ? 3 : � � � ➢ ➢ - 693E € a � e33 � e § � � € : P : � } � % 3 [ Section 6.0 Indoor Facilities Indoor facilities are summarized in the following table. Boys and Girls Club 1 1 1 5 City H al I 2 1 Cde Valley Christian School 2 Heritage Middle School 1 H om ec ourt 4 1 Meridian Academy 1 Meridian C orn m u n ity Center 2 Meridian Middle Schaal 1 Meridian Senior Center 1 1 5 1 1 ParamountElementa ry School 1 Tomlinson Sou[h Meridian YMCA 1 3 2 1 4 1 1 Victory M iddle Sc hcol 2 Willow Creek E lem entary Sc hod 1 Table 7: Indoor Facility Summary Pathways Summary From the 2020 Pathways Plan, "The City of Meridian currently has nearly 12 miles of paved pathways. However, all the pathways within the City of Meridian are discontinuous, making it more difficult for residents to utilize and access the full pathway system. Many existing parks have internal circulation pathways connected to the larger network, providing excellent destinations and resting points along the pathway network." "The City of Meridian is platted on a square-mile grid distinguished by major collector/minor arterial roads every mile. Many of these roads carry heavy traffic volumes at traffic speeds of 35 mph and above, making non-signalized at-grade crossings difficult. In addition, Interstate 84 bisects the north and south portions of the City, limiting the number of pathway connections that can be made across the freeway." "The existing City of Meridian pathway system is a tremendous resource. The City needs to focus on filling in the existing gaps within the built-out portion of the City in the future. At the same time, residential development implements the pathways plan in the undeveloped portions of Meridian." "The Meridian Pathways Master Plan is a guide for pathway development over the next 20 to 50 years. The Plan proposes an extensive pathway network stemming from the existing canal system within and around the City. The Plan includes an inventory of existing pathways and micro-paths and a comprehensive network of future pathways. These pathways will connect residents to schools, parks, businesses, neighborhoods, and various recreational and entertainment destinations." GIS Data from this map was incorporated into the level of service analysis. InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities Assesment Recreational Pathways Meridian, Idaho 2020 �_ •,.r. --- � Legend ����•,�.....:' ♦ .....:Area of City Impact •Q�:w.ti ��♦ ,♦ -- -Alternative Route Existing Pathway Long-Term Route •. F'W .e�YSw �_. :..- "T• 4y.���� . —Micro Pall s •;; On Street Route •" L_ W@HINDEN,BUVD, r-r •••••••^ Proposed Pathway E•eHINDEN�BLVD r :''•...if• "^'•°•^�'» '� Five Mile Pathway c k Z r. ,....:.:.:a rc Me tl an Loop Pathway 1 � Ra108 ,....... �� Meridian Parka W MCMILLANRD-- -••�+•--p ----- �—yy MCMILWN RD ua .p i ...., e: Z •'n... � r p �� 2 NS �... I''. W 'TIMpR p TM _- f . - -E-USTICK RDr j Pill- ..,e...,. ?� L I - VIE W-EHERRV EN _ p p ;V�FA AVER z �W-PINE-AVE-2. `O I E PINE•AVE ''E PINEAVE E-PIN£-A'V ry 2... +.........� pP,., p E`FRANK,IN-RD m m �`,», •� rr 1••- �` py;A'N'D-RD E-OVERLAND R.- ' o W IAMONfiRD „ ...g Q:1,- p;.•'�r-�L�,.�' .. .� ut W VICTORY-RD W VICTORY RD te r-- -E-VICTORY-RD - -E VICTORY-RD- u Z... 7- _j•• _ f W �WAMIT'-�D AMITY-RD* E AMI I E•AMITY RD . y 1!. { i g :..... .� ...... - i[ :1 _ i, a ' w -....., EiEIAKE HAZEL-RD�- Miles • - »c r—s a i ----------E'COWFy181A-RD�� NOTE:This document is intended as a planning tool for recreational pathway use.Actual conditions in the field may vary. Figure 20:Pathways Map Park Classifications See Appendix A for more information on park classifications. Section 6.0 Component-Based Level of Service Classification In general,the Meridian Park Classification System appears to work well with the current inventory. Each class of parks or facilities fall within reasonable ranges for acres and quantity of GRASP® components. The following table summarizes the classification system by park, component diversity, total components, and acres. Based on existing conditions, parks fall into the following classifications. Classification Location Diverse Total Acres Components Components Discovery Park 11 13 77 Regional Parks Julius M. Kleiner Park 25 39 56 Settlers Park 15 33 56 Bear Creek Park 11 13 19 Fuller Park 11 16 17 Heroes Park 10 11 30 Community Parks Hillsdale Park 7 8 10 Storey Park 8 10 18 Tully Park 12 13 18 8th Street Park 5 5 3 Centennial Park 6 6 0.5 Champion Park 7 8 6 Chateau Park 8 9 7 Gordon Harris Park 5 5 11 Neighborhood Parks Keith Bird Legacy Park 8 8 7 Renaissance Park 8 9 7 Reta Huskey Park 8 10 9 Seasons Park 7 8 7 Settlers Village Park 1 1 0.6 City Hall Plaza 6 6 1 Fire Station No.4 Park 2 2 1 Special Use Generations Plaza 4 4 0.2 (Sports Park, Golf, Trailhead) Meridian Swimming Pool 3 3 1 Lakeview Golf Course 2 2 120 Ten Mile Trailhead 1 1 1 Table 8:Park Classification Summary = CITY OF MERIDIAN, . • ParksWhat We Have - Inventory Alternative Providers The following alternative providers are located within or near the Meridian boundary and may provide various services. Park or Facility ership .JILAI I ra...li ca fi' Heritage Middle School Ball Fields 6 West Ada School District Special Use 4 1 Jabil Fields 8 West Ada School District Special Use 2 USER Undeveloped 31 Bureau of Reclamation Undeveloped C.F.McDevitt Park 39 Boise Nei hborhood Park 1 7 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cameron Park 1 Boise Nei hborhood Park 1 1 Cottonwood Park 8 Boise Nei hborhood Park 2 1 1 1 Pe ermintPark 7 Boise Nei hborhood Park 1 1 1 1 1 1 S camore Park 7 Boise Neighborhood Park 1 1 1 Many Home Owners' Association (HOA) and private providers also provide service throughout Meridian. They account for over 260 acres of additional parkland. These properties often have restricted access to the general public but serve adjacent residents or members.The following table summarizes the total number of each component identified at these facilities based on aerial photography and limited site visits. . -.. 6 30 9 .. 15 � 1 • 1 ••• 5 •• 109 6 . . 4 • • • • 89 513• Hart,—Morgan Stem Academy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • - 1 S35 Central Academy 1 2 S15 Chaparral Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 • S12 Chief Joseph Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 49 S39 Compass Public Charter School S,8 Crossroads Middle School , 1 , • 5 807 H iscwery Elem eulary School 1 1 1 1 - • 4 832 Heritage Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 S38 Hillsdale Elementary School 1 1 1 1 SO4 Hunter Elementary School 1 1 1 1 4 S17 Lewis&Clark Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •• 805 Lowell Scotl Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 822 Mary McPherson Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Find additional alternative provider details in 337 MendianAnademy 1 1 S16 Meridian Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix A. S40 Meridian High School 3 a 6 814 Mendian Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 S34 Mountain View Hgh School 3 4 2 6 1 831 Pammount Elementary School 1 , , , Schools SOB Pathways Middle School 1 1 S21 Pepper Ridge Elementary School , 1 1 1 S20 Peregrine Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Sol Pioneer School ofthe Ms 1 1 1 11 1 1 The analysis recognizes that schools offer 810 Ponderosa Elementary School 1 1 , 1 1 some recreation opportunities to the general S33 Prospect Elementary School , pp S33 Renaissance High School community but often have limited public access. S,l Rorkiver Valley Elie High Schuelry School , 1 1 S36 Rocky Mountain High School 3 4 6 1 Some schools also provide valued indoor 808 Sawtooth Middle School 1 1 1 1 S28 Siena Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 facilities for programming by the department. I S19 ISpaklingSTEMAcademy 1 1 , , Find additional schools' data in Appendix A. 809 VictorUstick Elementary School l S02 Victory Mitldle School 2 2 2 6 1 827 Wilk-Creek Elementary I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 6.0 System Map The system inventory map shows Meridian's relative size and distribution of existing parks and recreation facilities. Parks & Recreation System Map Meridian,Idaho Legend Indoor Facility -- 20 -� '� -__ _�__ --Existing Trail/Pathway -lij Willow Cre,k - — --I __� Proposed Keith Birtl� `J J Legacy Par Elemeb[ary Element ry -f ? � �I TraillPathway roe Ik 'Par k Iz - '1=�Qi� =Freeway I Interstate Fl�n7age itlktlle C .McDevitt Highway eme_ sNhdoPBatli L Perk M ivae —Major Street/Road Hentge y� otlon tl Other Street Road Middle Sshoo/_ L_ �---rl' `Camreron a Lake I River Stream Rete Huskey rk --_ _ t- r 55 park City of Meridian J = _ hemp, n Boise ersi We tern Ada Recreation Ten Mile' 1-�-�" —IJ ��r. t! an, usnck District i s seadons Trailin `r/,�_I �� - rJ 'L_, , J Western Ada School Parke - t ally Park -��� j Y r District law - ulius- .KI finer e hat eau 8th Street P c +Bureau of Reclamation ' ark r Mendian` VialgeePark_ I rkl School t Meridian errs Library J - I ridi'an HOA Parks Regional Pi*rk n '.� ((({ ������....,,,,/////Meridla idd/eII--Sc�I , Fairviev SattiaiCentr.n_ Property d Cble V.Uey Ct School L f_1�Meridian City Limit T AA'J liar �-BoyI 8 Girls Club AW.Hagiart Comm mry-enar l _ ,``Park ~_ Ern_ rations Plaza n r—— _ -� cit¢HaII ��<ennlal�ak - tt ffHomeronrt I, na,an- I_I Chamber o/ � ��gcatleTy - _ J an larl bi moral- IJ"�.Franklin L'--� Swimming Pool tdrer/.park�_,_ Syca ore�\ it i-_� . -��'^'-Ir--�.� Parkm ^`_I � �I � 1 I� I - � L_ Jabil `r JJJ p Overla ntlJ "`J � Gordor'Haarris PepF-i ` Park iJ Park C ee rk zrk 1 I "'Illy I _ _ Fire S fioh i Middle Schoo! ,^ lNp.4l,Park vi�roy -1 e J ark MCA -1 Hillside Park 0 % t 2 Miles ` t.-.-. McpPratlucetlFaCAyofMe'itlien-Sy The GRASP@Tmm This Map lslntendetl Fa Planning&Oiscussim Purposes Only- ��IJ -�� I c. r Please Refer TO The Pmject 0oormenfFa Mep Oeisls � Lagentl Elements Mny Very Slightly In Size,Colm &Transparency From Those Shown On Map ` GIS Data Sou roes Maylnclude' City of Meridian,ESRI,GRASP@ Team-January 2022 Copyright©2022 Meridian Columbi Figure 21:System Map Larger scale maps are located in Appendix A. InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities B. STEP 2: ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS - HOW ARE WE DOING? Regional Parks Park Scoring Park scoring illustrates how the parks and components community Neighborhood Score Score serve residents and users. There is no ultimate or Settlers Park 382 166 perfect score. These scores often make the most Julius M.Kleiner Memorial Park 339 257 sense when compared within the same classification, DiscaveryPark 86 68 Le., when comparing one Community Park to another Community Park. It may be reasonable that there is a wide range of scores within a category. Still, it may also Community Parks be an opportunity to re-evaluate a park's particular classification based on the level of service it provides mmunity Neighborhood to the community or neighborhood it serves. In the Score Scare Fuller Park L 91 Aii. 70 case of Discovery Park, it is in Phase I development Tully Park ■ 73 I LL- 62 would mean adding Community and Neighborhood 6earCreekPark ■ 67 53 value as further development occurs. Heroes Park ■ 62 52 Storey Park I rn IM51 In addition to locating components,the assessment Hillsdale Park includes quality,function, condition, and modifiers. Cumulative scores reflect the number and quality of Neiahborhood and Mini Parks these components and the availability of modifiers such as restrooms, drinking fountains, seating, parking, Community Neighborhood and shade. Higher scores reflect more and better Parkorl'acility smr re recreation opportunities than lower scores. Keith Bird Legacy Park ` 57iM 52 M Reta Huskey Park 44 Renaissance Park 47 Chateau Park M43 Champion Park _38 Seasons Park llllllllllllllI" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIF38 Centennial Park lllllllllllllll r 36 Gordon Harris Park 1111W 31 IL&L 31 Sth Street Park IL 29 _P9 Settlers Village Park 4 1 4 9t' *y4 Special Uses Communi Neighborhood Score Score City Hall Plaza 1 34 01 34 Generations Plaza RL 24 L 24 Meridian Swimming Pool IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiii�9 `14 y Lakeview Golf Course _14 _14 Fire Station No.4 Park _13 _13 Ten Mile TraiIhead 10 10 Heritage Middle School Ball Fields 7 2 JablJl Fields 7 1 4 Table 9: Park Scores by Classifications RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 6.0 Level of Service Analysis What is the Level of Service, and why do we use it? Level of Service (LOS) measures how a system provides residents access to parks, open spaces, pathways, and other facilities. It indicates the ability of people to connect with the outdoors and nature and pursue active lifestyles with implications for health and wellness,the local economy, and quality of life. LOS for a park and recreation system tends to mirror community values, reflective of peoples' connection to their communities. It is also useful in benchmarking current conditions and directing future planning efforts. The service offered by a park or a component is a function of two main variables: • What is available at a specific location • How easy it is for a user to get to it. What Is GRASP®? GRASP has been applied in many communities across the country to measure LOS. With GRASP®, information from the inventory combined with GIS software produces analytic maps and data, called perspectives, that show the distribution and quality of these services. What Do Perspectives Do for Us? Perspectives can take the form of maps, statistics, diagrams, tables, and charts. These analyses provide benchmarks or insights useful in determining community success in delivering services. The inventory performed with the GRASP®-IT tool provides details of what is available at any given location, and GIS analysis measures user access. People use various ways of reaching a recreation destination: on foot, on a bike, in a car, via public transportation, or some combination. In GRASP® perspectives,there are two distinct types of service areas for examining the park system to account for this variability: • Walkable Access - uses a distance of th mile, a suitable distance for a ten-minute walk. • Neighborhood Access - uses a travel distance of one-mile to each component. It is intended to account for users traveling from home or elsewhere to a park or facility, most likely by bike, bus, or automobile. Combining the service area for each component and � ham I n the assigned GRASP®score into one overlay creates ' p �ai'k Ustick a "heat" map representing the cumulative value of all components. This allows the LOS to be measured for any resident/user or location within the study area. In ly the mapping, the darker orange shading,the higher the LOS. Further discussion on perspectives and GRASP® - — - r`--J ll Kleiner terminology is found in Appendix A. Pa Fk E ark Verrdr n kFairvietiv f ZSrnjiukCvntur' Figure 22:Example of a GRASP®LOS Perspectives Heat Map NOTES: • Proximity relates to access.A component within a specified distance of a location is considered"accessible." "Access"in this analysis does not refer to access as defined in the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). • Walkable access is affected by barriers,obstacles to free and comfortable foot travel.GRASP@ analysis accounts for these barriers. • The LOS value at a particular location is the cumulative value of all the accessible components within a given service area. 84 CITY OF • InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities Walkable Access To Recreation Pedestrian Barriers Pedestrian barriers such as major streets, highways, railroads, and rivers significantly impact walkable access in Meridian. Zones created by identified barriers, displayed as dark purple lines, serve as discrete areas accessible without crossing a major street or another obstacle. Various green parcels represent parks and properties, and brown parcels are schools. 20 Gr O Y.'��nill r a u do wa b - IL Ilb Lar Cr, pry - Fairview 77 m 0 'a u Vitt4:�+ ictof; l � L L i Legend -Inset Map QPedestrian Barriers Meridian City Limit Coiu mb e Figure 23:Walkability Barriers"Cut-off"Service Areas(where applicable) The dark purple boundaries represent pedestrian barriers. Walkability measures how user-friendly an area is to people traveling on foot and benefits a community in many ways related to public health, social equity, and the local economy. Many factors influence walkability, including the quality of pathways, sidewalks, or other pedestrian rights-of-way, traffic and road conditions, land use patterns, and public safety considerations. Walkability analysis measures access to recreation by walking. One-half mile catchment radii have been placed around each component and shaded according to the GRASP®score. Scores are doubled within this catchment to reflect the added value of walkable proximity, allowing direct comparisons between neighborhood access and walkable access. Environmental barriers can limit walkability. The LOS in the walkability analysis has been "cut-off" by identified barriers where applicable. Section 6.0 The following analyses shows the LOS available, based on a ten-minute walk. Gray areas fall outside of a ten-minute walk to recreation opportunities. The images' darker gradient areas indicate higher quality recreation assets based on the ten-minute walk. The first analysis shows only service provided by Meridian parks and the second analysis included Meridian parks and other providers. Meridian Service --- r p � f' r—o , i � Mun illar. 55 n u Q J m■ 7 �w7 Cherry � � � LiairV1 g � � s Franklin I er and J — Legend-Inset Map L, _ GRASPC)LOS _`r� `J Jyl Vicfo Range:0 to 644 + `- No Access within 10 y r f L-:Vq min walk Less Access within _ �- 10 min walk `J G reate r A cce ss within 10 min walk Ca lumhia Figure 24:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Provided by Meridian Parks(only) CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO InventoryWhat We Have - Parks Facilities Meridian Service with HOA Parks z0 — !I I — o Ii a'x i—I IH C rL L -_ a� ❑ d v oo�1 ter. Ma d1lan I r �JL L Cherry ba 0Li ran it J r� e v?= tL--- �J er and II � t Legend r I n+ n \ VI ry( victory c G RA SP(R:)L o S r--- Range:0 to 680 9 __',f ° f ° _ No Access within 10 min walk Less Access within 10 min walk J d _ _ .�J Greater Access �- .l I within 10 min walk lumhia Figure 25:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities by All Providers In general,these images show that Meridian has an excellent distribution of parks and facilities. The orange shading in the maps allows for an understanding of LOS distribution across the City. Areas of higher concentration are at several locations throughout the City, but most predominant is around Kleiner Park. The following figure shows the high-value area near the l; � ., red star indicates the maximum GRASP®value area. From f ��•�� this location near Kleiner Park, users can access all 39 components at Kleiner Park. In addition,the senior center, five HOA parks (12 components), and an elementary school are all accessible within a ten-minute walk. i I Figure 26:Walk High-Value Area RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 6.0 While the heat maps are an important tool in looking at equity and distribution of services,they are limited in some areas. For example,they do not indicate what LOS is appropriate. Therefore, additional analysis is performed. The ability to show where LOS is adequate or inadequate is an advantage of using GIS analysis. First, an appropriate or target LOS for Meridian residents is determined. The target value would be comparable to a typical or average Neighborhood Park in Meridian (see following table). The diversity within these parks represents the critical finding that parks vary greatly yet score similarly in the GRASP®system. Based on the previous plan and analysis a target of a park with at least eight different components or a park with five components and a nearby trail/pathway. Examples of these parks in Meridian are Chateau, Keith Bird Legacy, Renaissance, and Rita Huskey Parks. Chateau Park 7 Neighborhood 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 9 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7 Neighborhood 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 Renaissance Park 7 Neighborhood 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 9 Reta Hus key Park 9 N. boyhood 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 8 10 Table 10:Target Park Calculation Walkability Gap Analysis These "target value" parks and their components will likely attract users from a walkable distance. The following map brackets GRASP®values to areas that meet this target score, fall below the target, or offer no service within walking distance. Purple areas indicate where walkable LOS values meet or exceed the target in the following figure.Areas shown in yellow can be considered areas of opportunity. Currently parks and assets in these areas do not meet the target value. Improving the LOS value in such areas may be possible by enhancing the component quantity and quality in existing parks without acquiring new lands or developing new parks. Another option might be to address pedestrian barriers in the immediate area. In this analysis, 48% of the City's land area has LOS that exceeds the target value or, in other words, is purple. 6% percent (gray) is without access to recreation opportunities within a 10-minute walk.Yellow regions (46%) have access to some recreation but not at the target level. s, r Now Now Q _- I ........... .. tS.. NMI = CITY OF • InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Meridian,Idaho Legend G1RAS1o0)Gap Analysis Target 86A W// Ire A th - I •MeT.ss or Exceeds 1 IK i Bird �}- EI ry P11r;F 4rC } T-��-- '-- LgacYP k T-'� F,¢_man 4 z Below Target H ary 'Park Ir lr�i� NOAccess wRhin lg H�dWt6ge @IZtlle C F.McDevitt -_. SNhdol Ball Itl L Perk IMn 4 Indoor Facility M Earettng H 9 S IhiM 610 d ti TaillPathway L,-t -I»� r�F �aPPmeron Proposed 4..H k y'Pa rk Park a TmillPathway J__ �1�RC- —Freeway I Irdersfafe I1_-� 4j.__ers�.L��� l�!ark p5n Highway T-M le I P3'ik I.lust Malor street l Road Tra'Iheatl "l- nine,street I Road Park I T�71(y PJrk-•--- Lakev'ew y hateau l,,,iii�_�xSlm`t Par{i �i �Ik KI rror Lake l Ri-1 Stream Golf Course Lui Settlem ark Mentlianl City of Meridian CWlape Park West Mar 1 r Lb ry s ndr n +Boise Reg onal P k r Mendia Mddl School, Fan 3NmolCentev Property FWestern Ada �, Col Valley Chnsri-School Recreahon Distdct (Park I MendiaH Cor?munrry Center Western Ada School GPrmraBons Plaza I, � District -� ktenniallPark Cil�}Hall l� � I I _ Bureau of jChamb,,of I I; y° j �Reclamabon _ Commerte y nkl,n i School rt rr S gPool to,�L ark I HOA Parks - Sycamore� u 'r Park CJ'Mendmn City Limit I � J bil l m ver Gordon' I� -k k Park�-"`.: 11 Z ar Cise�lc Par J. Yrcro .`I,J Park I. � _Fire Sk,tin 14 Middle School _ '�� >_Np9lrark lI i ' T uic�ory I� I[PP.,k IMCA W�E 1`�1 I 17}{ _ Hillsdale 0 Y� 7 2 `\ Miles L.�.-. j:..., _.. Map Produced Far CRyd Merka,-By The GRASPSTeem t'-'rl �� This MaPalnknded Far NaMni, &Dxusskn Purposes Only- `-� � ,--�1 of rY -I I P. Re TOThe Projed DowmentF.Wp Detals 11 v Legend Ekme Wy`%810tN11 Sae C- -- J I ��� STransparen So,Those lalod On Map _-.lI GISData1,GRASMeT..-e IIIr `I \\ CMolMekeWWigi0202MTeam-January20]2 COPMigM©2022 Merkan Figure 27:GRASP®Walkable Gap Analysis(10 min= %2 mile Service Area) The results are more favorable when comparing this analysis to census data as Meridian is well positioned,with virtually all residents within walking distance to some outdoor recreation opportunities, including 68%within a target score(purple) area.These are positive results and offer opportunities for improvement in yellow or lower-scoring areas.This chart illustrates the population by service level. It indicates that parks are generally well placed and capture a higher population than land area. % of Population With Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation 0% Percent Totaf Area=0 32% Percent Total Area >0 AND <86.40 68% Percent Total Area >=86.40 Figure 28: Percentage of Population by Service Level RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 6.0 I. }It, W ..... � F :•., ' ��` �`���� f �a-. " a � ��X � _� ,ram�� +'�_ ti Neighborhood Access to Recreation Analyses also examine neighborhood or one-mile access to recreation opportunities. Again, looking at service provided by Meridian parks only and then services by all providers. Darker gradient areas on the following images indicate higher quality recreation assets based on a one-mile service area. Meridian Service r' J r - � zo - __ * 1+1 r5 rt -z.J - c i a 55 1A Cherry , X� T � 17� d irvi a m verand r+ Legend -Inset Map +` ---1 GRASP®LOS �� ° 1 yi o victory Range: 0 to 600 i f ' L� No Access within 1 ti r mile `1•�_� —L ` tq�� Less Access within 1 �� 69 �, ;' U mile �- 4 ' ' q Greater Access E'J' within 1 mile t� I Figure 29:Neighborhood Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Provided by Meridian Parks(only) = CITY OF • InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities Meridian Service with HOA Parks 20 J r L, IaLv j r �r^M1 �V :;.6 cq ■ ;�, r, g sherry i .F S }� w L a 9 •1 0 * 4 U verand r+ _ L L Legend - � r, ' 177 w GRASP®LOS �___I � L Ju' to victory r Range: 0 to 683 .a No Access within 1 mile 69 Less Access within 1 mile i 6 ~ _ I raj F� Greater Access +� r within 1 mile i L_—_ ou Figure 30:Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities by All Providers These maps show that Meridian has an excellent distribution of parks and facilities. Areas of higher concentration are distributed throughout the City, but most predominant is around Kleiner Park. The orange shading in the maps allows for an understanding of LOS distribution. For example, the red star indicates the most significant GRASP®value area (683) in the following figure. The dashed line is a one-mile service area. From here, residents can access three Meridian parks with 50 components, four HOA parks with 16 components, and two schools. a Section 6.0 lJ _ _ i _ 4 e RM •r raa ar-ter�r _ Figure 31: Neighborhood Access(High-Value Area — K- Neighborhood Gap Analysis In this gap analysis, 77% of Meridian is in a purple area (target score), 20%yellow and just 3% gray. Neighborhood Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Meridian,Idaho fh•_-�'`+ } e Legend GRASP®Gap 28 1l _� �,-� -- Target:86.4 r A ^ Li NM/o^a'Gt't'k ��r'+ �• Meets or Exceeds jl,e G" l-t ermr,�r „py99 r„,�, Target LNe i P:r. �� r - ?- I Below Target r J., I. ¢ R n •~ = amp I�I No Access within l 1 t_ c�aalydpe le II4 c .Mmevel �mlle ! _ p ^r tic • Mc it O Indoor Facility 1 a 1.Existing Trall/Pathway _____--_• ` -____ - r (r�r- t __{. Proposed �- _i 55 ° _- '�-n ne T,,IIPathway Freeway l Interstate Highway pa^M I ,J' ` —Major Steel lRoad j T ••a L- - ^ �-i —Other Street/Road Y cP�� pvs - rty- .rcn �j Lake/River l Stream - r•1' -x ' [A!'r�ka'aJ 5vi Y' "ikW Part. l+.1[ City of Meridian _ - ,perryLW h y �iA 111¢ynlin �Boise 1 a1A •t,'• - h �.,.tl k. - eirvie xy xr/ r d 4 II.. "' Western Ada LWr L6iltry Zh dvr'SrAool �Racreation Ois[rid Il2r `3arsIdG.Vls CJLL ldv1 Co G Nrr Lrnai Western Ada School _ — t _ k a� l l O6RldnncPeze = p Diet�t �'-r-tf - !�- C Hall r�. 11 Burean c1 r Z o i Reclamation x I ; J •r -adv o aY n— eK x School • MtFnmIn09� 5y i,�l 4,} � + _ �C'.•er14 I.�.-_� _. �,y� - _HOA Parks - ft� ,_t Meridian City Limit • - ter---, .r---- _J -- � - 0se1a^d n i � - xn r_i-•� rart ' wcra•v 4" �- �� �h i �' f Ire nldcrr scnml - , ,.-.r-HP.:, erx i �4f 4 --S •t'• I Ilr�a,b Miles 'y Map Pmdu�d For City of Meridian-By The GRASK Twor v This Map Is Intended For Planning 8 Dl—aim Purposes Only- 'a ` -.J I %ease Refer To The Pged Document For Map Details I' I Legend Elements May Vary Slightly In Shia,Color -- - r�. ❑ _ _�' B Tansparenq F-Those Shown On Map J I �J- - GISDataSourcesMayInclude: City of Meridian,ESRI,GRASP®Team-January 2022 ` _ ClumDl C%yrghM 2022 Meridian ___ Figure 32:Neighborhood Gap Analysis(I mile service) ANCITY OF • InventoryWhat We Have - Parks & Facilities A comparison to census data shows all residents live within a one-mile service area. Percentages are shown in the following pie chart. % of Population with Neighborhood Access to Outdoor Recreation 9% Percent Total Area=0 Percent Total Area >0 AND <86.40 Percent Total Area >=86.40 Figure 33:Percentage of Population by Service Level GRASP® Comparative Data Meridian parks are comparable to other agencies across the country by using these scores. The GRASP® National Dataset currently consists of 83 agencies, 5,488 parks, and nearly 30,800 components. Top 35ofall Top 35ofall Park Scores Park Scores 2 M 300 Components, Agencies, Parks When comparing Meridian to other agencies and parks in the dataset, six parks score in the top ten percent of all parks in the overall GRASP®score.Two of those two parks are in the top 35 parks overall. Additional findings in these comparisons reveal that Meridian is above the average of other similar- sized agencies in components per location,the average score per location, and components per capita. 2 Components Components Avg Score /1 K Population Per Location Per Location GVRD,CA-2 10 Peartand,TX-8 Victorvitle,CA-37 However, Meridian scores lower total park and in parks per capita. Total Locations Parks/1 K Population 125 10m2 GVRD,CA-0.3 The table (right) provides additional comparative data from other communities of similar populations to Meridian across the United States. Because every community is unique,there are no standards or "correct" numbers. Section 6.0 Greater Vallejo Hampton,VA Victorville,CA Meridian,ID Recreation Pearland,TX Average District,CA 2019 202D 2D22 2D20 2015 2015-2D22 136,128 127,D27 124,79D 119,217 101,900 121,932 � 4.7 2.7 5A 2.1 2.9 4 28,192 41,341 23,191 57,894 30,468 37,535 79 21 25 36 21 36 542 169 256 216 164 269 1 8 1D 6 8 8 2064 775 1694 875 1556 1,393 15 6 14 7 15 11 .� 26 37 68 24 74 46 ■ i 96% 57 h 97 h 52% 85% 77% ■ ■ 127 58 179 59 162 117 4 1 2 2 2 2 ■ 27 22 33 29 55A 33 2D% 34 h 68% 27% 50% 4D% 1731 6049 4992 3312 4852 4,187 0.58 D.11 0.20 D.3D 021 D.3 Betterthan the average Be low th a ar eraq e Table 11:GRASP®Comparative Data 2022 to 2015 Overall Comparison One advantage to a plan update is comparing the LOS results from 2015 to the most recent analysis. The following table shows many different comparisons and generally indicates that the LOS for residents has been maintained despite significant growth. While the population has increased,the number of parks, components, and overall LOS has increased to keep pace overall. Perhaps the most significant increase is in the percentage of residents with walkable access. Part of this increase reflects the appropriate locating of new parks and a more thorough inventory of existing HOA parks. What We Have - Parks & Facilities Inventory Assesment 2022 2015 194,790 94,289 23,191 18,159 ■ 25 21 256 207 1694 1317 • 14 14 67-8 62-7 a 97% 98% • a 179 196 2 2 + - 33 38 ■■ ■ 5-4 52 680/0 bu% - - - 4992 4490 •+ 020 022 Table 12: Master Plan Comparison Capacities Analysis A traditional tool for evaluating service is capacity analysis, which compares the number of assets to the population. It projects future needs based on a ratio of components per population (i.e., as the population grows over time, components may need to be added to maintain the same proportion). The following table shows the current capacities for selected elements in Meridian. While there are no correct ratios, use this table in conjunction with input from focus groups, staff, and the general public to determine if the current ratios are adequate. r � PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE Section 6.0 TWA eC CuD on Cunent Ratio per .. . -d on Quantity 2021 Ratio component . .. Population 124,790 142,522 Aquatics,Spray Pad 5 0.04 24,958 6 1 Basketball Court 3 0.02 41,597 3 0 Basketball Practice 16 0.13 7,799 18 2 Climbing,Designated 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Goncessions 9 0.07 13,866 10 1 Diamond Feld 19 0.16 6,668 22 3 Disc Golf 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Dog Park 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Educational Experience 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Event Space 4 0.03 31,198 5 1 Fitness Area/Course 6 0.05 20,798 7 1 Game Court 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Historic Feature 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Horseshoe Court 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Loop Walk 16 0.13 7,799 16 2 Open Turf 16 0.13 7,799 18 2 Passive Node 8 0.06 15,599 9 1 Pickleball Court 10 O.08 1Z479 11 1 Playground, Destination 3 0.02 41,597 3 0 Playground, Local 17 0.14 7,341 19 2 Public Art 7 0.06 17,827 6 1 Rectangular Feld Large 7 0.06 17,827 6 1 Rectangular Feld Multi le 2 0.02 62,396 2 0 Shelter Large 24 0.19 5,200 27 3 Shelter Small 12 0.10 10,399 14 2 Tennis Court 7 0.06 17,827 8 1 TraiIAr-cess Point 13 0.10 9,599 15 2 Trailhead 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Volleyball Court 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Water Access Developed 3 0.02 41,597 3 0 Water Access General 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 Water Open 2 0.02 62,395 2 0 All components with ccrrent quantities less than 5 are omitted Pojected population growth vill not likely trigger additional need in 5 years Table 13:Meridian Capacities The table's usefulness depends on future residents' interests and behaviors and the assumption that they are the same today. It also assumes that today's capacities are in line with needs. The capacities table bases analysis on the number of assets without regard to distribution, quality, or functionality. Higher LOS is achieved only by adding assets, regardless of the location, condition, or quality of those assets. In theory, the LOS combines location, quantity, and quality. Based on projected population growth, Meridian needs to add components shown in red and include many of those components currently found in a typical neighborhood park. Other components may be part of a future Discovery Park expansion and serve the greater community. Meridian provides approximately 3.9 acres per 1000 people. The City should consider adding 69 acres of developed parks over the next five years based on projected population growth to maintain that service level. InventoryWhat We Have - Parks Facilities to N v N Q Meridian Parks 464 Current Rat�oof ParkAcFesper000 Populaton UJRRENT POPLILA TON 2021 124,79D Current Ratio-of Park Acres per 1000 Population 3.9 PROJECTED POPLLATION-2026 142,522 Total acres needed to maintain current ratio park acres withgrowth* 553 Acres io add vfdevelvped Parks" 69 'Does not lncklde andevetgped park acres at West McRden R?Vonal Park Prcperty(40 Table 14:Acres of Park Land per 1,000 Residents Comparing Meridian to national statistics published in the "2021 NRPA Agency Performance Review: Park and Recreation Agency Performance Benchmarks", Meridian does well in some categories but falls short in others. Based on the calculations,the City falls short in a few components but many of those may be provided by other providers as indicated in the table notes. Meridian meets or exceeds the median in diamond fields and adult soccer fields. 2021 NRPAAgency Performance Review:Park and Recreation Agency Performance Benchmarks Outdoor Park and Recreation Facilities Median Need to add Need to add Agencies Number of Meridian Meridian to Meet with Offeringthis Residentsper Residentsper Residents Per Park NA 3,104 4,992 21 Acres of Park Land per 1,000 Resrdents NA 8.9 3.9 530 627 Basketball courts 97.4% 9,477 41,597 3 12 14 Community gardens 48.3% 72,238 NA 0 2 2 Diamond fields:baseball-adult 51.3% 38,899 -1-6 -15 Diamond fields:baseball-youth 78.0% 12,914 6,S68 19 -9 -8 Diamond fields:softball fields-adult 65.5% 28,081 -1s -14 Diamond fields:softball fields—yorah 59.3% 26,073 -14 -14 Dog park 64.9% 76,610 6Z,395 2 0 ❑ Playgrounds 94.4% 4,804 6,M0 20 6 10 Rectangular fields:multi-purpose 66.4% 10,792 2 3 Rectangular fields;soccerfield-adult 43.6% 20,000 12,476 10 -4 -3 Rectangular fields;soccerfield—youth 49.9% 12,646 ❑ 1 Skate park 39.3% 109,799 124,790 1 0 ❑ Tennis courts loutdooronly) 1 91.4% 1 5,919 17,827 8 13 16 Camparfsan based onmediml for 10Q XO to 250,L170 poprdatmo?comparison Surplus Possible Deficit Table 15:Outdoor Park and Recreation Facilities—Median Population Served per Facility More on Utilizing GRASP® Perspectives GRASP® perspectives evaluate the LOS throughout an area. Their purpose is to reveal possible gaps in service. However, it is not necessarily beneficial for all community parts to score equally in the analyses. The desired LOS for a location should depend on the type of service,the site's characteristics, and other factors such as community need, population growth forecasts, and land use issues. For example, commercial, institutional, and industrial areas often have lower service levels than residential areas. GRASP® perspectives focus attention on gap areas for further scrutiny.Analyses can determine if current levels of service are appropriate if used in conjunction with other assessment tools such as needs assessment surveys and a public input process. 7. 0 WHERE WE GO FROM HERE RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION- PLAN A. RECOMMENDATIONS After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this master planning process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research, the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes ways to enhance the LOS and the quality of life with improvement through organizational efficiencies, financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, maintenance and improvements to facilities and amenities. t � �- ,s s_ — 4W �` 98 City of Meridian, Idaho Where We Go From Recommendations Action Plan GOAL 1: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCIES Objective 1.1 — Maintain existing LOS goal The City of Meridian currently has a LOS planning goal that is 4 acres of developed park land per 1,000 persons. In 2022, the City is maintaining 3 acres per 1,000 population to keep up with the rapid growth of the City. Meridian should continue with the planning goal of 4 acres, while continuing to maintain the existing 3 acres. Additionally,the City also has a planning goal of 0.59 square feet of indoor recreation space per 1,000 population. The City should maintain the planning goal for indoor recreation space. Objective 1.2 — Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services. The Parks and Recreation Department currently has a Marketing Plan (Communication Plan)that guides the Department's efforts in communicating and promoting its activities, services, and facilities. As part of a larger effort, the City of Meridian has an active communication roundtable that the Department should actively participate with. In addition to the roundtable,the Department should take advantage of training opportunities for new communication methods and branding efforts. The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and potential partners within the community. Objective 1.3 — Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. A top priority from the public response is to continue to maintain and make improvements to existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CFP Plan and the Life Cycle Replacement Program. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: • Completing a golf course Master Plan * completed in 2021-2022 • Creating a plan for Tier 2 and Tier 3 golf course improvements • Developing the Urban Forestry Management Plan with existing staff* completed in 2021-2022 • Taking the Urban Forestry Management Plan to the Planning Commission and City Council for feedback and acceptance * completed in 2021-2022 • Implementing the park identity and theming plan Objective 1.4 — Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies The Department should continue to use a mixed method approach to communicating with the public about programs, services, and opportunities. Mobile marketing is a trend of the future.Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore adding navigation apps for parks and pathways. Teaming with the public app AIITrails would be a good starting point. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies adding Wi-Fi in Phase 2 of the Discovery Park development. Objective 1.5 — Increase appropriate partnerships within the community. The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. The City-Wide Strategic Plan recommends establishing a timeline to transfer pool operations from WARD to the City. * Operations were transferred in the summer of 2022. UPDATEPARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN Section 7.0 GOAL 1: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCIES CONTINUED Objective 1.6 — Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. As recommended in the Master Plan and based on the Staffing Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and facility upgrades, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current performance standards.The Department should explore opportunities to increase staffing levels as growth continues. This will require new positions both in parks and recreation. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends promoting and growing the current volunteer program. • 41194111 41JDJ1,T1R?_0VE_F& Objective 2.1 — Maintain and improve existing facilities. The Department should continue to implement existing plans,the CFP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs, and the Master Plan. These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: • Renovating the existing on-course restrooms for ADA compliance at Lakeview Golf Club • Replacing old equipment for improved golf course maintenance operations • Upgrading the golf course irrigation system Objective 2.2 — Expand pathways and connectivity. The Department should continue to update and implement the existing Pathways Master Plan as development continues. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated,the Department should explore ways to the improve pathway inspections and approval process. To assist with the implementation and oversight of this process, the City should consider the addition of a Parks Operation Crew Chief. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also identifies: • Construction of the six identified pathway connections • Implementation of formal pathway standards based on size, route/loop, and incorporate testing and acceptance requirements prior to final approval • Partnering with the ULI for place-making and amenity design on the Five Mile Creek Pathway • Creating branding and wayfinding tools for priority pathway segments Objective 2.3 — Add indoor recreation space. Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results,there is a need for additional indoor recreation space.The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a new community center.Another option would be to explore opportunities to add community centers to newly planned elementary and middle schools or future regional parks. The City-Wide Strategic Plan recommended conducting a needs assessment and conceptual planning for a new community center. As part of this planning process, a feasibility study was conducted, and conceptual designs were developed. The feasibility study and conceptual designs were presented to City Council and the final report provided as a staff document. Where We Go • - Recommendations Action Objective 2.4 — Develop new amenities at existing parks based on LOS analysis. Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users.As Meridian continues to grow, the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth areas. Also, based on the GRASP® analysis,the Department should look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where the LOS is below threshold. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: • Design of Phase 2 for Discovery Park and bid for development * completed in 2021-2022 • Construct Phase 2 of Discovery Park using CMGC and design build methods • Construct a teen activity area at Discovery Park in Phase 2 Objective 2.5 — Acquire new land for parks. Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching 4 acres of developed park land per 1,000 population,the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below threshold. Objective 2.6 — Improve parking at parks. Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups and in the survey. The Department should continue to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and manage parking at parks with popular amenities, activities, and events. Another consideration would be to explore alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand for large scale events. Objective 2.7 — Continue to monitor ADA needs in the community. Parks and Recreation currently has an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identifies needed changes during the self-evaluation process. The Department should continue to monitor new facilities and upgrades for compliance. Objective 2.8 — Upgrade comfort, convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities. As the Department is making upgrades to and improving existing facilities, it should explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, and other amenities at existing facilities. Where appropriate, look for opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: • Working with the Meridian Arts Commission to finalize a plan for future public art projects • Completing the addition of the Meridian Speedway to the Historic Register • Investigating new locations to add to the Historic Register Objective 2.9 — Create park identity in existing and new parks. As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified,the Department should explore opportunities to add unique features, such as destination playgrounds, public art, signage, unique shelters, natural play areas, and/or climbing elements at new and existing parks. The newly adopted City-Wide Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Phase 2 of Discovery Parks that uniquely blends arts, entertainment, adventure sports, and culture. Objective 2.10 — Address current and future needs for athletic fields. As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. Section 7.0 •AL 2: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE FACILITIES AND AMENITIES CONTINUED Objective 2.11 — Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks. As the Department continues to develop new parks and renovate existing parks, continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. Objective 2.12 — Maintain component-based inventory and LOS standards. The Department should review the component-based inventory from the 2022 Master Plan Update when planning new parks and installing new amenities. The inventory and GIS database should be updated for tracking of new components. Objective 2.13 — Continue to maintain life cycle replacement plan. The Department should continue to monitor and update its life cycle replacement plan annually. •AL 3: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE PROGRAMS Objective 3.1 — Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community. The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens,teens, people with special needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases, continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens schedules. Continue to explore opportunities to produce, attract, promote, and maintain events in the City. Exploring opportunities to offer new programs in outdoor adventure recreation to teens and active adults. Continue to monitor participation and demand for family-centered recreational programs and adjust to meet the needs of the community. The City-Wide Strategic Plan also recommends: • Expanding class and program offerings at the new community center • Expanding summer camps to 3-4 sites to help meet community demand • Attracting a national, qualifying sports tournament • Expanding traditional and non-traditional sports leagues and tournaments • Adapting and expanding community events to meet community needs • Adding a City event to enrich Dairy Days • Providing the Parks Division resources to support Dairy Days Where We • • - Recommendations Action GOAL 4: INCREASE FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES Objective 4.1 — Increase special event and activities sponsorships. The Department should continue to secure sponsorships for existing and future events. Objective 4.2 — Evaluate developer impact fee ordinance. The Department should continue to monitor impact fees from new developments as growth continues. The ordinance should be reviewed every 3-5 years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally,the Department should review its impact fee revenue annually to align with CFP requests and existing LOS. Objective 4.3 — Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities. The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services, and facility improvements. The Department should continue to pursue any and all grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. Working with the City's CDBG Grant Administrator, explore opportunities to use CDBG funds for parks, pathways, and/or recreation facilities. Objective 4.4 —Implement a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy. The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery, but it varies based on the different service areas. The Department should implement the recommendations from the Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy study completed during this master planning process. The Department should continue to support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program through increased marketing and awareness of the program to attract more families. Explore feasibility of additional revenue sources for parks and recreation as identified in the "Present and Projected Fiscal Resources" section of the Master Plan. } �I I t f� � '1 - RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 7.0 B. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIONS: The following Goals, Objectives, and Action Items for the recommendations are drawn from the public input, inventory, LOS analysis, community survey,findings feedback, and all the information gathered during the master planning process with a primary focus on maintaining, sustaining, and improving City of Meridian parks, recreation, and pathways. All cost estimates are in 2022 figures where applicable. Most costs are dependent on the extent of the enhancements and improvements determined. Timeframe to complete is designated as: • Short term (up to 3 years) • Mid-term (4-6 years) Long term (7-10 years) GOAL 1: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCIES Objective 11.11: Maintain existing LOS goal Actions Timeframe to Complete 1.1.a Continue the planning goal of 4 acres of park land per 1,000 population and On-going existing component levels in parks; immediate goal is to maintain the 3 acres per 1,000 population that Meridian historically maintains. 1.1.b Continue the planning goal of 0.59 square feet of indoor recreation space per On-going 1,000 population. Objective 1.2: Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services Timeframe to Actions Complete 1.2.a Participate in communication roundtables and meet regularly to discuss Short Term communication and promotional activities and options. 1.2.b On-going Provide training on new communication methods and branding efforts. 1.2.c Promote MPR active recreation classes through the Meridian Moves Program, as Short Term noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. � CITY OF MERIDIAN, . • Where We • • - Recommendations Action Objective 1.3: Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities Timeframe to Actions Complete 1.3.a Continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities through the On-going CFP and the Life Cycle Replacement programs. 1.3.b Short Term Complete the golf course Master Plan, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 1.3.c Create a plan for Tier 2 and Tier 3 golf course improvements into the CFP, as Short to Mid Term noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 1.3.d Develop the Urban Forestry Management Plan with existing staff, as noted in Short Term the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 1.3.e Take the Urban Forestry Management Plan to the MPR Commission and City Short Term Council for feedback and acceptance, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 1.3.f Implement the park identity and theming plan, as noted in the City-Wide Short Term Strategic Plan. Objective 1.4: Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies Actions Timeframe to Complete 1.4.a Continue to employ a mixed method approach to communicating with the public Short Term about programs, services, and opportunities. 1.4.b Add a pathway app for wayfinding and customer service, also team with AIITrails Short Term as a starting point. 1.4.c Short Term Add Wi-Fi in Discovery Park, Phase 2, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. Section 7.0 Objective 1.5: Increase potential partnerships within the community Timeframe to Actions Complete 1.5.a On-going Build on existing partnerships. 1.5.b Continue to explore additional partnerships and build on alternative providers to On-going increase LOS. 1.5.c Partner with WARD to establish a timeline to transfer pool operations, as noted Short Term in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. Objective Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service Timeframe to Actions Complete 1.6.a Based on the Staffing Plan, explore opportunities to increase staffing to meet current needs and maintain optimal staffing level as new parks,facilities, and On-going programs are acquired, developed, and implemented. 1.6.b Promote and grow the volunteer program, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic On-going Plan. GOAL 2: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Objective 2.1 - Maintain and improve existing facilities _--monswr�W Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.1.a Continue to implement existing plans, CFP, Master Plan, and Life Cycle On-going Replacement programs. 2.1.b Review existing plans, CFP, Master Plan, and Life Cycle Replacement programs On-going and update as needed. 2.1.c Short to Mid Renovate the existing on-course restroom for ADA compliance (at Lakeview Golf Term Club), as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.1.d Short to Mid Replace old equipment for improved golf course maintenance operations, as Term noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.1.e Short to Mid Upgrade the golf course irrigation system, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Term Plan. Where We • • - Recommendations Action Objective 2.2: Expand pathways and connectivity Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.2.a Continue to update existing Pathways Master Plan; review annually and make On-going updates as needed. 2.2.b Explore ways to improve the pathway inspection and approval process. Consider On-going adding a Parks Operations Crew Chief position to oversee. 2.2.c Construct the six identified pathway connections, as noted in the City-Wide Short Term Strategic Plan. Objective 2.2 (continued): Expand pathways and connectivity 2.2.d Implement formal pathway standards based on size, route/loop, and incorporate On-going testing and acceptance requirements prior to final approval, as noted in the City- Wide Strategic Plan. 2.2.e Partner with the ULI for place-making and amenity design on the Five Mile Creek Short Term Pathway, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.2.f Create branding and wayfinding tools for priority pathway segments, as noted in On-going the City-Wide Strategic Plan. Objective 2.3: Add indoor recreation space Actions Timeframe to Complete 2.3.a Continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space Short Term either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a new Community Center. 2.3.b Conduct a needs assessment and concept planning for a new community center, Short Term as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.3.c Mid-Term Explore opportunities to add additional community centers to newly planned Long Term elementary and middle schools or future regional parks. Section 7.0 Objective 2.4: Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on LOS analysis Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.4.a Short Term Look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in new growth areas. Mid-Term Long Term 2.4.b Short Term Look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where LOS is Mid-Term below threshold. Long Term 2.4.c Short Term Design and bid Discovery Park, Phase 2, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.4.d Construct Phase 2 (Discovery Park) using CMGC and design build methods, as Short Term noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.4.e Construct a teen activity area in Discovery Park, Phase 2, as noted in the City- Short Term Wide Strategic Plan. Objective 2.5: Acquire new land for parks Actions Timeframe to Complete 2.5.a Mid to Long Continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. Term 2.5.b Mid to Long When considering new parks, look where LOS is below threshold. Term Objective 2.6: Evaluate parking at parks, events, and scheduled activities Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.6.a Short to Mid Explore opportunities to improve and manage parking at parks with popular Term amenities, activities, and events. 2.6.b Short to Mid Consider alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand for large Term scale events, especially with large TUP events in parks. Objective 2.7: Continue to monitor ADA needs of the community Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.7.a Short Term Continue to monitor new facilities and upgrades for ADA compliance. Mid-Term Long Term Where We • • - Recommendations Action Objective 2.8: Upgrade comfort, convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.8.a Short Term Explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, etc. appropriately Mid-Term at existing facilities. Long Term 2.8.b Short Term Explore opportunities to add public art appropriately at existing facilities. Mid-Term Long Term 2.8.c Short Term Work with the Meridian Arts Commission to finalize a plan for future public art Mid-Term projects, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. Long Term 2.8.d Short Term to Complete the addition of Meridian Speedway to the Historic Register, as noted in Mid-term the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 2.8.e Investigate new locations to add to the Historic Register, as noted in the City- On-going Wide Strategic Plan. Objective 2.9: Create park identity in existing and new parks Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.9.a Explore opportunities to add unique features, such as signage, destination Short to Mid playgrounds, public art, unique shelters,theming, entertainment, and cultural Term features, natural play areas and/or climbing elements. 2.9.b Short to Mid Foster development of Phase 2 of Discovery Park that uniquely blend arts, Term entertainment, adventure sports, and culture. Objective 2.10: Address current and future needs for athletic fields Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.10.a Explore opportunities to add both rectangle and diamond athletic fields as use Short to Mid and demands warrant. Term 2.10.b Short to Mid Where appropriate, add or improve sports field lighting to new and existing Term facilities. Section 7.0 Objective 2.11: Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.11.a Short to Mid Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing Term new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. Objective 2.12: Maintain component-based inventory and LOS standards Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.12.a Short to Mid Review the updated component-based inventory and LOS standard when Term planning new parks and amenities. 2.12.b Short to Mid As new parks and components are built, update GIS database for tracking. Term Objective 2.13: Continue to maintain life cycle replacement plan Timeframe to Actions Complete 2.13.a Continue to maintain the life cycle replacement plan and update annually. On-going GOAL 3: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE PROGRAMS AND SERVICE DELIVERY Objective 3.1: Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community W"--Timeframe to ons Complete 3.1.b Expand class and program offerings at the new community center, as noted in the On-going City-Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.c Expand summer camps to 3-4 sites to help meet community demand, as noted in On-going the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.d Continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and On-going demand. Where We • • - Recommendations Action Timeframe to Actions Complete 3.1.e Continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and On-going commuting citizens. 3.1.f On-going Explore opportunities to produce, attract, promote, and maintain events. 3.1.9 Attract a national, qualifying sports tournament to Meridian, as noted in the City- On-going Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.h Expand both traditional and non-traditional sports leagues and tournaments, as On-going noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.i Adapt and expand community events to meet community needs, as noted in the On-going City-Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.j On-going Add a City Event to enrich Dairy Days, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic Plan. 3.1.k Provide Parks resources to support Dairy Days, as noted in the City-Wide Strategic On-going Plan. 3.1.1 Explore opportunities to offer new programs in outdoor adventure recreation to On-going teens and active adults. 3.1.m Continue to monitor participation and demand for family-centered recreational On-going programs and adjust to meet the needs of the community. GOAL 4: INCREASE FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES Objective 4.1 Increase special event and activities sponsorships Actions Timeframe to Complete 4.1.a Short Term Continue to secure sponsorships for events and activities. Mid-Term Long Term Objective OrdinanceEvaluate Impact Fee Timeframe to Actions Complete 4.2.a Continue to monitor impact fees from new developments. On-going 4.2.b On-going Review Impact Fee Ordinance every 3-5 years and adjust as needed. RECREATIONPARKS AND Section 7.0 Objective 4.3: Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities Timeframe to Actions Complete 4.3.a Short Term Continue to seek philanthropic donations and grant opportunities. 4.3.b Work with the City's CDBG Grant Administrator to seek opportunities to use On-going CDBG funds for parks, pathways, and/or recreation facilities. Objective 4.4: Implement a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy Actions Timeframe to Complete 4.4.a Implement the recommendations from the Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy study On-going completed during the master planning update process. 4.4.b Continue to support current Care Enough to Share (Scholarship Program)through On-going increased marketing and awareness of the program to attract more families. 4.4.c Explore feasibility of additional revenue sources for parks and recreation as Short Term identified in the "Present and Projected Fiscal Resources" section of the Master Plan. C. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES/STRATEGIES The following is a listing of suggestions for successful implementation of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These elements represent the commitment and discipline required to integrate the process into daily operations, now and in the future. • The Parks and Recreation Master Plan becomes the guidepost for the Department.When decisions or responses to the community are needed, the plan becomes the reference point for decision making and whether or not new issues or responses to the community are of higher importance than what has been established as existing direction. • The Parks and Recreation Master Plan information should be included as part of the new employee orientation program. • Post the Executive Summary of the plan on the website and track results on the site.This will assist in providing the community with information about the Department's strategic direction and its commitment to results. It may also be helpful to print a color brochure of the Executive Summary to distribute to interested partners and community members to provide a quick snapshot of the plan. • A staff member or team should have responsibility of being the project manager or "champion" of the plan's implementation to help ensure success. This champion is responsible for monitoring the plan's progress and works with other staff, City management, and other departments to effectively integrate the plan within operations. • A staff member or team should be assigned accountability for each recommendation. The project lead will Where We Go From Recommendations Action Plan have responsibility for tracking progress of the plan. • Regular reporting of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan's progress should occur. divide the plan into separate fiscal years and report one year at a time, as an on-going annual work plan. Each action item for the year should include a list of strategies that support its completion. The strategies are developed prior to each year for the upcoming list of action items and are developed by the staff members involved in completing the action item. It is the project leader's responsibility to report on his/her action items, in a quarterly report. A suggestion is to enter each year's data on a spreadsheet or strategic planning software that lists the goals, objectives, action items, start dates, completion dates, and the name of the staff member responsible for the action items completion. • At the end of the year, perform an annual review of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and document any changes to objectives and action items to reflect changes in priorities. This process can be included at an annual review meeting in which successive years' objectives and action items are discussed as part of the annual budget process.Action items will tie into both the operating and capital budget process. • Update major stakeholders on the plan's implementation and results on an annual basis. • Conduct staff meetings on a quarterly or semi-annual basis to review the progress on implementation of the plan. • Post a chart of each year's recommendations on office walls in administrative areas with a check-off column designating completion as part of a visual management program. • If there are ideas for new strategies that arise throughout the year, include them on a written "parking lot" and review them as part of the annual just-in-time review to determine if they change or replace any existing strategies or action items. • At the five-year mark of the plan, complete a shortened update, including repeating the statistically valid survey and demographic projections. Adjust existing recommendations as necessary. Imptementation Guidetines: Strategies for Success . r Plan becomes the Establish a staff member Each member reports on At end of year,perform Conduct staff meetings If new ideas arise guidepost for the or team to serve as his/her action item in a annual review of the plan on a quarterly or semi- throughout the year, quarterly report. department. project champions. and document changes to annual basis to review include them on a objectives and action progress. written"parking IoY' Implement knowledge of Assign member or team items and note priority and review to see if they pan for new employee recommendations and changes. add or replace to orientation program hold accountable. existing initiatives. 000000000000 Post Executive Summary Divide the plan into Develop a spreadsheet Update major Post a chart of each At the 5-year mark of of the plan on the separate fiscal years or use strategic planning stakeholders on plan's year's recommendations the plan,complete a Agency's website. and report 1 year at a software listing goals, implementation on an on office walls in shortened update time as ongoing work objectives,action items, annual basis. administrative areas including a repeat of the Print a color brochure of plan start dates,completion with check-off column statistically valid survey the Executive Summary dates,and staff and demographic Develop strategies for member's name. projections. each action item Adjust recommendations as necessary. RECREATIONPARKS AND iri APPENDIX A - GRASPS GLOSSARY AIRIDIAN MtKIDIAN HISTORIC • • HISTORIC • ► OWNTOWN -.T DOWNTOWN ESTABLISHED 1 893 ESTABLISHED 1 893 E PINE AVE r y Y BOYS AND i 1 GIRLS CLUB L 1 ± ♦� C .!1l�� i t + + 114 City of Meridian, Idaho 1 • Q Gtossary Buffer: see catchment area Catchment area: a circular map overlay that radiates outward in all directions from a component and represents a reasonable travel distance from the edge of the circle to the asset. Used to indicate access to an asset in a LOS assessment Component: an amenity such as a playground, picnic shelter, basketball court, or athletic field that allows people to exercise, socialize, and maintain a healthy physical, mental, and social wellbeing Geo-Referenced Amenities Standards Process® (GRASP®): a proprietary composite- values methodology that takes quality and functionality of assets and amenities into account in a LOS assessment GRASP® Level of service (LOS): the extent to which a recreation system provides community access to recreational assets and amenities GRASP®-IT audit tool: an instrument developed for assessing the quality and other characteristics of parks, trails, and other public lands and facilities. The tested, reliable, and valid tool has been used nationwide in more than 125 park systems inventories. Low-score component: a component given a GRASP®score of"1" or"0" as it fails to meet expectations Lower-service area: an area of a District that has some GRASP® LOS but falls below the minimum standard threshold for the overall LOS Modifier: a basic site amenity that supports users during a visit to a park or recreation site, to include elements such as restrooms, shade, parking, drinking fountains, seating, BBQ grills, security lighting, and bicycle racks, among others No-service area: an area of a District with no GRASP® LOS Perspective: A perspective is a map or data quantification, such as a table or chart, produced using the GRASP® methodology that helps illustrate how recreational assets serve a community Radius: see catchment area Recreational Connectivity: the extent to which community recreational resources are transitionally linked allows for easy and enjoyable travel between them. Recreational Trail: A recreation trail can be a soft or hard-surfaced off-street path that promotes active or passive movement through parklands or natural areas. Recreational trails are typically planned and managed by parks and recreation professionals or departments. Service area: all or part of a catchment area ascribed a particular GRASP® score that reflects the LOS provided by a specific recreational asset, a set of assets, or an entire recreation system Appendix Threshold: a minimum LOS standard typically determined based on community expectations Trail: any off-street or on-street connection dedicated to pedestrian, bicycle, or other non- motorized users Trail network: A trail network is a functional and connected part of a trail system. Different networks are separated from other trail networks by missing trail connections or barriers such as roadways, rivers, or railroad tracks. Trail system: all trails in a community that serve pedestrian, bicycle, and alternative transportation users for purposes of both recreation and transportation Transportation trail: A transportation trail is a hard-surface trail, such as a district sidewalk, intended for traveling from one place to another in a community or region. These trails typically run outside of parklands and are managed by Public Works or another district utility department. GRASP® Components and Definitions GRASP@ Outdoor Component List GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type Adventure An area designated for activities such as ropes courses, zip-lines, Course challenge courses. The type specified in the comments. Amusement Carousel, train, go-carts, bumper cars, or other ride-upon features. Ride The ride has an operator and controlled access. Aquatics, An aquatic complex has at least one immersion pool and other Complex features intended for aquatic recreation. Aquatics, Lap Pool A swimming pool intended for swimming laps. Aquatics, A swimming pool intended for leisure water activities. May include Leisure Pool zero-depth entry, slides, and spray features. GRASP@ Gtossary GRASP@ Outdoor Component List GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type Aquatics, Spray A water play feature without immersion intended for interaction with Pad moving water. Aquatics, A therapy pool is a temperature-controlled pool intended for Therapy Pool rehabilitation and therapy. Basketball Court A dedicated full-sized outdoor court with two goals. Basketball, A basketball goal for half-court play or practice, including goals in Practice spaces associated with other uses like parking lots. A batting cage is a stand-alone facility with pitching machines and Batting Cage restricted entry. Bike Complex A bike complex accommodates various bike skills activities with multiple features or skill areas. A designated area for non-motorized bicycle use, constructed of Bike Course concrete, wood, or compacted earth. May include a pump track, velodrome, skills course. Defined campsites may include a variety of facilities such as Camping,Defined restrooms, picnic tables, water supply. Use the official agency count for quantity if available. Indicates allowance for users to stay overnight in the outdoors in Camping, undefined sites. Undefined camping receives a quantity of one for Undefined each park or location. Use this component when the number of campsites is not available or for dispersed camping. Climbing, A designated natural or human-made facility provided or managed by Designated an agency for recreation climbing but is not limited to play. Climbing, Indicates allowance for users to participate in a climbing activity. Use a General quantity of one for each park or other location. Appendix GRASP@ Outdoor Component List GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type Concession A facility used for the selling, rental, or other provision of food, drinks, goods, and services to the public. Diamond Field Softball and baseball fields, suitable for organized diamond sports games. Not specific to size or age-appropriateness. Diamond Field, Many ballfields at a single location are suitable for tournaments. Complex Diamond Field, An open or grassy area is used to practice diamond. It doesn't lend itself to organized diamond sports games and from open turf by the Practice presence of a backstop. Disc Golf A designated area for disc golf. Quantities: 18 hole course = 1; 9 hole course =.5 Dog Park An area explicitly designated as an off-leash area for dogs and their guardians. Signs, structures, or features that provide an educational, cultural, or Educational historical experience. They are distinguished from public art by the Experience presence of interpretive signs or other information. Assign a quantity of one for each contiguous site. Equestrian An area designated for equestrian use and typically applied to facilities Facility other than trails. Event Space A designated area or facility for an outdoor class, performance, or special event, including an amphitheater, bandshell, stage. Fitness Course Features intended for personal fitness activities. A course receives a quantity of one for each complete grouping of fitness equipment. Game Court Outdoor court designed for a game other than tennis, basketball, and volleyball distinguished from a multi-use pad, including bocce, GRASP@ Gtossary Outdoor Component GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type shuffleboard, and lawn bowling. The type specified in the comments. Quantity counted per court. Garden, A garden area that provides community members a place to have a Community personal vegetable or flower garden. An area designed and maintained to provide a focal point or Garden, Display destination, including a rose garden, fern garden, native plant garden, wildlife/habitat garden, and an arboretum. Golf A course designed and intended for the sport of golf counted per 18 holes. Quantities: 18-hole course = 1; 9-hole course =.5 Golf, Miniature A course designed and intended as a multi-hole golf putting game. Golf, Practice An area designated for golf practice or lessons, including driving ranges and putting greens. Horseshoe Court A designated area for the game of horseshoes, including permanent pits of regulation length. Quantity counted per court. Horseshoes Several regulation horseshoe courts in a single location. They are Complex suitable for tournaments. Ice Hockey Regulation size outdoor rink explicitly built for ice hockey games and practice. General ice skating included in "Winter Sport." Inline Hockey Regulation size outdoor rink built specifically for in-line hockey games and practice. Opportunity to complete a circuit on foot or by non-motorized travel Loop Walk mode. Suitable for use as an exercise circuit or leisure walking. Quantity of one for each park or other location unless more than one particular course is present. UPDATEPARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN Appendix GRASP@ Outdoor Component List GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type A painted area with games such as hopscotch, 4 square, tetherball Multi-Use Pad found in schoolyards. As distinguished from "Games Court," which is typically single-use. Describes an area in a park that contains plants and landforms that Natural Area are remnants of or replicate undisturbed native regions of the local ecology. It can include grasslands, woodlands, and wetlands. A grassy area that is not suitable for programmed field sports due to Open Turf size, slope, location, or physical obstructions. It may be used for games of catch, tag, or other informal play and uses that require an open grassy area. Other An active or passive component that does not fall under another definition. Specified in comments. A place designed to create a pause or particular focus within a park Passive Node includes seating areas, plazas, overlooks, and not intended for programmed use. Pickleball Court A designated court designed primarily for pickleball play. A designated area with a grouping of picnic tables suitable for Picnic Ground organized picnic activities. Account for individual picnic tables as Comfort and Convenience modifiers. A destination playground attracts families from the entire community. Playground,Destination Typically has restrooms and parking on-site. May include special features like a climbing wall, spray feature, or adventure play. Playground, A local playground serves the needs of the surrounding neighborhood. Local Includes developed playgrounds and designated nature play areas. These parks generally do not have restrooms or on-site parking. GRASP@ Gtossary Outdoor Component GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type Public Art Any art installation on public property. Art receives a quantity of one for each contiguous site. Rectangular Several rectangular fields in a single location. A complex is suitable for Field Complex tournament use. Describes a specific field large enough to host one adult rectangular Rectangular field sports game such as soccer, football, lacrosse, rugby, and field hockey. The approximate field size is 180' x 300' (60 x 100 yards). The Field, Large field may have goals and lines specific to an individual sport that may change with the permitted use. Describes an area large enough to host one adult rectangular field sports game and a minimum of one other event/game, but with an undetermined number of actual fields. This category describes a large Rectangular open grassy area arranged in configurations for any number of Field, Multiple rectangular field sports. Sports may include but are not limited to: soccer, football, lacrosse, rugby, and field hockey. The field may have goals and lines specific to an individual sport that may change with the permitted use. Describes a specific field too small to host a regulation adult rectangular field sports game but accommodates at least one youth Rectangular field sports game. Sports may include but are not limited to: soccer, Field, Small football, lacrosse, rugby, and field hockey. A field may have goals and lines specific to a particular sport that may change with a permitted use. A shade shelter or pavilion large enough to accommodate a group Shelter, Large picnic or other event for a minimum of 13 seated. Address lack of seating in scoring. A shade shelter, large enough to accommodate a family picnic or other Shelter, Small event for approximately 4-12 persons with seating for a minimum of 4. Appendix GRASP@ Outdoor Component List GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type Covered benches for seating up to 4 people are included in comfort and convenience scoring and should not be included here. A small or single feature primarily for wheel sports such as Skate Feature skateboarding, in-line skating. The component may or may not allow freestyle biking. Categorize dedicated bike facilities as Bike Course. An area set aside primarily for wheel sports such as skateboarding and in-line skating. The park may allow freestyle biking. It may be Skate Park specific to one user group or allow for several user types and accommodate various abilities. Typically has a variety of concrete or modular features. Target Range A designated area for practice or competitive target activities. The type specified, such as archery or firearms, in comments. Tennis Complex Multiple regulation courts in a single location with amenities suitable for tournament use. A court that is suitable for recreation or competitive play. Quick-start or Tennis Court other non-standard types specified in comments. Tennis, Practice A wall intended for practicing tennis. Wall Track, Athletic A multi-lane, regulation-sized running track appropriate for track and field events. A trail, paved or unpaved, is separated from the road and provides recreational opportunities or connections to walkers, bikers, Trail, Multi-Use rollerbladers, and equestrian users. Paths that make a circuit within a single site are Loop Walks. GRASP@ Gliossary Outdoor Component GRASP® Outdoor Definition Component Type An unpaved path is located within a park or natural area that provides Trail, Primitive recreational opportunities or connections to users. Minimal surface improvements that may or may not meet accessibility standards. Trail, Water A river, stream, canal, or other waterway trails for floating, paddling, or other watercraft. A designated staging area at a trail access point may include Trailhead restrooms, an information kiosk, parking, drinking water, trash receptacles, and seating. Volleyball Court One full-sized court. It may be a hard or soft surface, including grass and sand. May have permanent or portable posts and nets. Wall Ball Court Walled courts are associated with sports such as handball and racquetball—the type specified in the comments. Water Access, A developed water access point includes docks, piers, kayak courses, Developed boat ramps, fishing facilities. It is specified in comments, including the quantity for each unique type. Measures a user's general ability to access the edge of open water. Water Access,General May include undeveloped shoreline. Typically receives a quantity of one for each contiguous site. This passive water-based amenity provides a visual focal point that Water Feature includes fountains and waterfalls. Water, Open A body of water such as a pond, stream, river, wetland with open water, lake, or reservoir. An area designated for a winter sport or activity. For example, a Winter Sport downhill ski area, nordic ski area, sledding hill, tobacco run, and recreational ice. The type specified in the comments. Appendix Inventory Methods and Process The planning team's detailed GIS (Geographic Information System) inventory first prepared a preliminary list of existing components using aerial photography and GIS data. Components identified in aerial photos were located and labeled. Next, the team conducted field visits to confirm or revise preliminary component data, make notes regarding sites or assets, and understand the system. The inventory for this study focused primarily on components at public parks. Each element's evaluation ensures it serves its intended function, noting any parts needing refurbishment, replacement, or removal. The inventory also included recording site comfort and convenience amenities such as shade, drinking fountains, restrooms, and modifiers. Collection of the following information during site visits: Component type and geo-location Component functionality Based on the condition, size, site capacity, and overall quality, assessment scoring. The inventory team used the following three-tier rating system to evaluate these: • 1 = Below Expectations • 2 = Meets Expectations • 3 = Exceeds Expectations ■ Site modifiers ■ Site design and ambiance ■ Site photos ■ General comments 1 • Q Gtossary Asset Scoring All components were scored based on condition, size, site capacity, and overall quality, reflecting the user's expectations of recreational features. Beyond the quality and functionality of components, however, GRASP® LOS analysis considers other essential aspects of a park or recreation site. Not all parks are created equal, and their surroundings may determine the quality of a user's experience. For example, the GRASP® system acknowledges the essential differences between identical playground structures as displayed in the following example photos: In addition to scoring components, GRASP&IT assesses each park site or indoor facility for comfort, convenience, and ambient qualities. These qualities include the availability of restrooms, drinking water, shade, scenery. These modifier values then enhance or amplify component scores at any given location. This inventory atlas consists of the GIS data displayed by location on an aerial photograph. Compiled GIS information collected during the site visit, including all GIS data and staff input. An accompanying data sheet for each site lists modifier and component scores and observations and comments. Analyzing the existing parks, open space, trails, and recreation systems determines how they serve the public. Level of Service (LOS) defines the capacity of various components and facilities to meet the public's needs regarding the size or quantity of a given facility. Appendix Park Classifications The Nature of Classification Systems Most park and recreation agencies organize lands and facilities into various classes, types, categories, or other schemes as a planning and management tool. Park classification systems are commonly utilized by park and recreation agencies. However, once established, classification schemes are rarely modified. Over time, they may lose effectiveness as a tool due to changing agency or community values. Purposes for classifying lands and facilities into different categories include: • Determination of policies and strategies for management and operation of lands and facilities. • Definition of categories of need for land and facilities and identifying potential acquisitions to meet those needs. • Establish policies and strategies for land acquisition, including exactions, easements, leases, and other processes, in addition to fee-simple purchase. • Establish benchmarks and goals for providing services and measure the efforts towards meeting these. In 1995, the National Park and Recreation Association published the following classification table. It represented the most current thinking on classification and standards for parklands and facilities. NRPA Parks and Open Space Classifications(1995) Parks,Open Space,and Pathways Classification Table Parks and Open Space Classifications Classification General Description Location Size Criteria Mini-Park Used to address limited.isolated or unique Less 1M mile distance in Between 2500 sq,ft and one recreational needs residential setting acre in size Neighborhood park remains the basic unit of the park Up to to 1/2 mile distance and 5 acres is considered Neighborhood system and serves as the recreational and social uninterrupted by non-residentialminimum size.5 to 10 acres is Park focus of the neighborhood,Focus is on informal activity and passive recreation roads and other physical barriers optimal Depending on circumstances,combining parks with School-Park school sites can fulfill the space requirements for Determined by location of school Variable depends on function other classes of parks,such as neighborhood, district property community,sorts complex,and special use Serves broader purpose than neighborhood park. Determined by the quality and As needed to accommodate Community Focus is on meeting community-based recreation suitability of the site,Usually desired uses. Usually Park needs,as well as preserving unique landscapes and serves two or more neighborhoods between 30 and 50 acres o ens ces within a 3-mile distance Large Urban parks serve a broader purpose than community parks and are used when community and Determined by the quality and As needed to accommodate Large Urban neighborhood parks are not adequate to serve the desired uses_Usually a Park needs of the community.Focus is on meeting suitability of the site.Usually minimum of 50 acres with 75 community-based recreational needs as well as serves the entire community or more acres being optimal preserving unique landscapes and open s aces Natural Lands set aside for preservation of significant natural Resource availability and Resource resources,remnant landscapes,open space and Opportunity Variable Areas visual aesthetics or buffering Greenways Effectively tie the park system components together to Resource availability and Variable form a continuous park environment Opportunity Consolidates heavily programmed athletic fields and Determined by projected Sports associated facilities to larger and fewer sites Strategically located Community- demand usually a minimum of Complex strategically located throughout the community wide facilities 25 acres with 40 to 80 acres being optimal Special Use Covers a broad range of parks and recreation facilities Variable—dependent on specific Variable Park oriented toward single-purpose use use Private Parks and recreational facilities that are privately Variable—dependent on specific Park/Recreation owned yet contribute to the public park and recreation use Variable Facilitysystem CITY OF • 1 • Q Gtossary NRPA has since moved to GIS mapping of Park and Recreation Lands. The GRASP® methodology is one example of a GIS-driven, component-based system that may be used for both classification and LOS analysis. Classifications must be clear, straightforward, and understandable. Often methods are adopted that are ambiguous or use conflicting criteria for defining individual classes of lands and facilities. Planners and administrators often try to do too many things at once within a single scheme. A common failing of classification systems is that they tend to be used based on parcel size rather than land use. Often, a large parcel has a wide and diverse set of uses. No single classification encompasses the full range of purposes that the parcel addresses. So a classification is chosen from among the possible choices. Still, it cannot describe all of the functions of that parcel. A common solution is to develop a new category that fits the parcel. Over time, this leads to too many classes and becomes unwieldy and less useful. Consider a site located in a residential area on 20 or 30 acres with a wooded section and a developed park portion. It may have a playground intended for use by the neighborhood but not much else. This site would be classified as a neighborhood park based on usage but a community park based on size. An exception must be made to the standard to assign it to one classification or the other. That same park might have a large lawn area used for soccer games. The combination of size and use would place it in the community park category. Still, everyone considers it a neighborhood park because of its location and the people it serves. Another exception is made to the standard. Or a new classification is created to address the unique situation. Classifications are of relatively little importance to the general public. A visitor chooses to visit a particular park or facility for its amenities, not based on its classification. A park name that includes its classification, such as Meridian Community Park, may suggest to the potential visitor what amenities it contains. However, the choice to visit is still based on the amenities found there regardless of name or classification. Classifications may be most valuable for internal use by an agency. Use or Function Based Level-of-Service Classification Another useful classification system is applied on a land-use rather than a parcel basis. To do this: a. List the various types of uses found within the agency's lands and facilities. b. Sort these into helpful categories relevant to the assets' planning, operation, and management. i. For example, if sports-oriented parks are managed differently than neighborhood parks, a clear and understandable definition of what uses constitute a neighborhood park should be developed. Appendix c. Once the use categories are defined, all of the land and facilities owned and managed by an agency should be evaluated to identify which parts fall within the various classifications. i. This should be done on use rather than a parcel basis. ii. A sports-oriented park may be defined by boundaries that reflect the use. iii. These boundaries may not necessarily coincide with parcel boundaries (though often they will). iv. These boundaries can be drawn in a GIS system and stored on separate layers from the parcel boundaries. V. By creating a new layer in the GIS with classifications based on use or functions, the classification system can be used more effectively to measure and manage the agency's assets. GRASP@ Gtossary Meridian Park Classifications and Descriptions Proposed Uni ue GRASP®Component Proposed Total GRASP® General Design and Development Range based on Component Range based on Proposed Classification Proposed General Description Guidelines Size and Street Frontage Guidelines Current Inventory Current l nventory Appropriate components may include but not be limited to: Destination Playground Servea broad purposeto thecommunity Dog Park and region while still providing adequate Sports Fields neighborhood level ofserviceto adjacent Splash Pads 50+acres based on current inventory Regional Park(Large Urban residents.Focus is on components that Event Space Park) occur in quantities,size and design to Open Turf Full access on at least two sides of park. 15 to 21 39+ serve large groups or community wide Shelter At least one side of the park should have events.May serve users from across city Basketball,Tennis,Picklebal 1,etc. access from a collector or arterial street. or region.Because of service area requires Loop Walk adequate parking facilities. Public Art Typical Comfort and Convenience Amenities(Picnic tables,benches,bike racks,drinking fountains,restroom,etc) Appropriate components may incl ude but not be limited to: Serve a broad purpose to the community Destination Playground whilestill providing adequate Dog Park neighborhood level of service to adjacent Sports Fields Open Turf 15 to 30 acres based on current inventory residents.Focus is on components that Shelter Community Park occur in quantities,size and design to Basketball or Other Courts Visible from adjoining street and street 7to9 8to 15 serve large groups or community wide Loop Walk frontage on at least two sides with 400 events.Generally serves users within 1-3 public Art feet minimum mile radius.Requires adequate parking to Typical Comfortand Convenience minimize neighborhood conflict. Amenities(Picnic tables,benches,bike racks,drinking fountains,restroom,etc) Appropriate components may include but The basic unit of the park system and not be limited to: serves as the recreational and social Local Playground focus of the neighborhood.Level of Open Turf .5 to 11 acres based on current inventory service is primarily provided to Shelter (City Standard Size is 7 acres) Neighborhood Park individual,families and small groups Basketball or Other Court Game 5 to 6 4.5 to 6 through unique components.Generally Loop Walk Visible from adjoining street and 200 feet serves residents within 1/2 mile walking Public Art of street frontage distance up to one mile and limited on-site Typical Comfort and Convenience parking provided. Amenities(Picnic tables,benches,bike racks,drinking fountains,restroom,etc) Covers a broad range of parks and Appropriate components may vary based recreational facilities oriented toward on use. Varies by use Special Use Park Typi cal Comfortand Convenience Varies Varies single-purpose use,limited,isolated or Amenities(Picnic tables,benches,bike Streetfrontage my vary by useand size unique recreational needs. racks,drinking fountains,restroom,etc) Appropriate components mayvary based on use. Varies by use Sports Park Sport oriented facility. Typical Comfortand Convenience Varies Varies Amenities(Picnic tables,benches,bike Street frontage my vary byuseand size racks,drinking fountains,restroom,etc) RECREATIONPARKS AND Appendix A 00 p 3 a a � a t H d O J lL J H V y yy a O Z 3 7 3 J N O O O i W J LL 12 6 Q A {y6 m O OO 0- 1yp R d L L .d O R or Facility Q Q m m C a x � O .181.1 m N H > 3 AMBERCREEK SUB NO 02ASTORIASUB BAINBRIDGE SUB NO 02BEDFORD PLACE SUB NO 03 BELLINGHAM PARK SUB NO 01 BIRCHSTONE CREEK SUBBLACKROCK SUB NO 01 :. BRIDGETOWER SUB NO 01 CHATSWORTH SUB CHERRY CROSSING SUBCHESTERFIELD SUB NO 04 COBBLEFIELD CROSSING SUB COBRE BASIN SUB NO 01 COURTYARDS AT TEN MILE SUB CROSSFIELD SUB NO 01 CROSSFIELD SUB NO 04 EDINBURGH PLACE SUB NO 01 ESTANCIASUB GRAMERCYSUB F.FTIWTIA�: • 0���������0���������� • 0���������0���������� • m w CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO GRASP@ Glossary �NJ OR 00 0 3 IL a L a H d O J LL 0 .O L V 9 'O !6 7 O E io p Z C C 7 J N O — 10 cyi 2r r v y - d 'o o m v a ii :. : m m t7 d m >CL w 2 a, a t s a R y E `O 0 a A ai t s d P i�j�dL HILLS CENTURY FARM SUB NO 01HOLLYBROOK SUB NO 01 LOCHSA FALLS SUB NO 04 JERICHO SUB KINGSBRIDGE SUB NO 01 LANDING SUB NO 08 LARKSPUR SUB NO 02 LYNDHURST GROVE SUB MEADOWSMACAILE MADELYNN ESTATES SUB MEDFORD PLACE SUB MARLIN SUB NO 01 MESSINA HILLS SUB NO 01MESSINA HILLS SUB NO 03 MESSINA MEADOWS SUB NO 01 MESSINA VILLAGE SUB NO 02 MILLIRON PLACE SUBMOSHERS FARM SUB NORMANDY SUB NO 03 OAKCREEK SUB NO 01 r.-rimra"4701.qr.-rBTe7dmr-.r.re Me Rockhampton 11 Park Rockhampton Park PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE Appendix A 0 O o. ILrL T 3 � j O d J V p io p Z C C 7 J N O - 1■ maLL !6 {0 Y Y N O. C 'y CI !6 w r0+ C d Gf Cr v tyo !0 H to O OO C. A lT0 A d L C d O O Park or Facility Q Q m m G C9 x -1 O a a a a m to H > SAGEWOOD SUB SAGUARO CANYON SUB NO 02 SPORTSMAN POINTE SUB NO 03 SPURWING GREENS SUB SUNDANCE SUB NO 02 SUTHERLAND FARM SUB NO 04 TIBURON MEADOWS ■ ■ • 1TRAILWAY PARK • �....�....-.......... TREE FARM SUB ••1 ©.........-.......... TURNBERRY SUB NO 1 �.........-..�....... TUSCANY LAKES SUB NO 1 �.........�..�....... ©.�.......�..�....... VENTANA SUB 1 • 1• 1 ©.�.......�..�....... \ACENZA SUB NO 1 WOODBURN SUB m.�.�.....0.........� WILKINS RANCH VILLAGE SUB OA/Private Totals WIPMEMEMEM6L.0 ..L.A�EEMB9 5 4 1 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO GRASP@ Gliossary Park Classifications S13 Barbara Morgan Stem Academy 1 1 1 > > 1 8 1.1 2 17.6 0.5 8.8 S35 Central Academy 1 1 2 1.1 2 4.4 0.5 22 S15 Chaparral Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S12 Chief Joseph Elementary Schad 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.1 2 132 0.5 6.6 S39 Compass Public Charter Schod 1 1 1.1 2 22 0.5 1.1 S18 Crossroads Middle School 1 1 1 1 4 1.1 2 8.8 0.5 4.4 SO7 Discovery Elementary School 1 1 1 1 5 1.1 2 11.0 0.5 5.5 S32 Heritage Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1.1 2 132 0.5 66 S30 Hillsdale Elementary School 1 1 1 1 4 1.1 2 8.8 0.5 4.4 SO4 Hunter Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 5 1.1 2 11 D 05 55 S17 Lewis&Clark Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 1.1 2 17.6 0.5 8.8 S05 Lowell Scott Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S22 Mary McPherson Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S37 Meridian Academy 1 1 3 1.1 2 66 0.5 3.3 S16 Meridian Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.1 2 13.2 0.5 6.6 S40 Meridian High School 3 3 s 1 5 1.1 1 2 11.0 0.0 0.0 S14 Meridian Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.1 2 132 0.5 6.6 S34 Mountain View High School 3 4 2 6 1 1 6 1.1 2 132 0.0 0.0 S31 Paramount Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 5 1.1 2 11.0 0.5 5.5 SO6 Pathways Middle School 1 1 1 1 4 1.1 2 88 0.5 44 S21 Pepper Ridge Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 5 1.1 2 11.0 0.5 5.5 S20 Peregrine Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.1 2 132 0.5 fi 6 S01 Pioneer School of the Arts 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S10 Ponderosa Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 1.1 2 17.6 0.5 8.8 S29 Prospect Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 1.1 2 13.2 0.5 6.6 S33 Renaissance High School 3 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 S11 River Valley Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S36 Rocky Mountain High School 3 a 6 1 5 5 1.1 2 11.0 0.0 0.0 S08 Sawtoolh Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 S28 Siena Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 7 1.1 2 154 0.5 7.7 S19 Spalding STEM Academy 1 1 1 1 9 6 1.1 2 132 0.5 6.6 SO9 UstickElementarySchool 1 1 1 1 1 10 6 1.1 2 132 0.5 fi 6 SO2 Victory Middle School 2 2 2 6 1 11 6 1.1 2 13-21 0.5 6.6 S27 Willow Creek Elementary 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 7 1.1 2 15.4 0.5 7.7 FSO1 Futu re S c hool A 1 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FSO2 Future School B t 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FS03 Future School C 1 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FS04 Future School❑ 1 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FS05 Future School E 1 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FS06 Future School F 1 1 1.1 2 2.2 0.0 0.0 FSO7 Future School G 1 1 1.1 2 22 0.0 0.0 FSOB Future School H 1 1 1 1 2 22 0.0 0.0 19 26 20 17 31 8 16 3 17 3 29 4 RECREATIONPARKS AND Appendix Composite-Values Level of Service Analysis Methodology GRASP® Score Each park or recreation location and components have been assigned a GRASP® Score. A basic algorithm calculates scoring totals, accounting for component and modifier scores, every park, and facility in the inventory. The resulting ratings reflect the overall value of that site. Scores for each inventory site and its components may be found in the GRASP® Inventory Atlas. The following illustration shows this relationship. GRASP®Score Calculation *Component -"Design & Assessment *The sum of site Ambiance" as a •Component Score modifiers stand-alone GRASP'Score determine a modifier multiplier Catchment Areas Catchment areas, also called buffers, or service areas, are drawn around each component. The GRASP® Score for that component is then applied to that buffer and overlapped with all other component catchment areas. This process yields the data used to create perspective maps and analytical charts. GRASP@ Gtossary Perspectives Score = z Maps and data produced using the GRASP® methodology are known as perspectives—each perspective models service across the study area. The system can be further analyzed to derive statistical information about service in various ways. Maps, Score S ~...,. tables, and charts provide benchmarks or insights a "nPw community may use to determine its success in delivering services. Plotting service areas for multiple components on a map produces a picture representing the cumulative LOS provided by that set of elements in a geographic area. In the following example graphic illustrates the GRASP® process, assuming that all three components and the park boundary itself are scored a "2". The overlap of their service areas yields higher or lower overall scores for different study areas. On a map, darker shades result from the overlap of multiple service areas. They indicate areas served by more or higher quality components. There is a GRASP®Value that reflects cumulative scoring for nearby assets for any given spot. The figure below, provides an example. Example of GRASP® Level of Service (LOS) S RarkhampF Ustick l_ti _ l � r — — JUN- •i- 0 I. F I Iner Pa!'k 'ark Me ridian I-airview RECREATIONPARKS AND • . Appendix More on Utilizing GRASPO Perspectives GRASP@ perspectives evaluate the LOS throughout a community from various points of view. Their purpose is to reveal possible gaps in service and provide a metric to understand a recreation system. However, it is not necessarily beneficial for all community parts to score equally in the analyses. The desired LOS for a location should depend on the type of service, the place's characteristics, and other factors such as community need, population growth forecasts, and land use issues. For example, commercial, institutional, and industrial areas might have lower LOS for parks and recreation opportunities than residential areas. GRASP@ perspectives focus attention on gap areas for further scrutiny. Perspectives used in conjunction with other assessment tools such as community needs surveys and a public input process to determine if current levels of service are appropriate in a given location. Plans provide similar levels of service to new, developing neighborhoods. Or it may be determined that different LOS are adequate or suitable. Therefore, a new set of criteria may be utilized that differs from existing community patterns to reflect these distinctions. Brief History of Level of Service Analysis To help standardize parks and recreation planning, many parks & recreation professionals look for ways to benchmark and provide "national standards." These standards might include how many acres, how many ballfields, pools, playgrounds a community should have. In 1906 the fledgling "Playground Association of America" called for playground space equal to 30 square feet per child. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the first detailed published works on these topics began emerging (Gold, 1973; Lancaster, 1983). In time "rule of thumb" ratios emerged with 10 acres of parklands per thousand, becoming the most widely accepted norm. Other normative guides also have been cited as traditional standards but have been less widely accepted. In 1983, Roger Lancaster compiled a book called "Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines," published by the National Park and Recreation Association (NRPA). In this publication, Mr. Lancaster centered on a recommendation "that a park system, at minimum, be composed of a core system of parklands, with a total of 6.25 to 10.5 acres of developed open space per 1,000 population (Lancaster, 1983, p. 56). The guidelines went further to recommend an appropriate mix of park types, sizes, service areas, acreages, and standards regarding the number of available recreational facilities per thousand population. While published by NRPA, the table became widely known as "the NRPA standards," but these were never formally adopted for use by NRPA. Since that time, various publications have updated and expanded upon possible "standards," several of which have been published by NRPA. Many of these publications did a benchmark and other normative research to determine what an "average LOS" should be. Organizations such as NRPA and the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration have focused on accreditation standards for agencies. These standards have been less directed towards outcomes and performance and more on planning, organizational structure, and management processes. The popularly referred to as "NRPA standards" for LOS, as such, do not exist. 1 • Q Gtossary It is critical to realize that the above standards can be valuable when referenced as "norms" for capacity but not necessarily as the target standards for which a community should strive. Each agency is different, and many factors are not addressed by the criteria above. For example: • Does "developed acreage" include golf courses"? What about indoor and passive facilities? • What are the standards for skateparks? Ice Arenas? Public Art? Etc.? • What if it's an urban land-locked community? What if it's a small town surrounded by open Federal lands? • What about quality and condition? What if there's a bunch of ballfields, but they are not maintained? • And many other questions. GRASP® (Geo-Referenced Amenities Standards Program) A new methodology for determining the LOS is appropriate to address these and other relevant questions. Composite-values methods are applied to measure and portray the service provided by parks and recreation systems. This methodology's primary research and development were funded jointly by GreenPlay, LLC, a management consulting firm for parks, open space, and related agencies; Design Concepts, a landscape architecture and planning firm; and Geowest, a spatial information management firm. The trademarked name for the composite-values methodology process is called GRASP® (Geo-Referenced Amenities Standards Program). For this methodology, capacity is only part of the LOS equation. Consider other factors, including quality, condition, location, comfort, convenience, and ambiance. Parks, trails, recreation, and open space are part of an overall infrastructure for a community made up of various components, such as playgrounds, multi-purpose fields, passive areas. The explanations and characteristics listed above affect the amount of service provided by the system's parts follow. • Quality-The service provided by anything, whether it is a playground, soccer field, or swimming pool, is affected by quality. A playground with various features, such as climbers, slides, and swings, provides a higher degree of service than one with only an old teeter-totter and some "monkey-bars." • Condition-The condition of a component also affects its service. A playground in disrepair with unsafe equipment does not offer the same function as one in good condition. Similarly, a soccer field with a smooth surface of well-maintained grass certainly provides more service than one full of weeds, ruts, and other hazards. • Location -To be served by something, you need to be able to get to it. The typical park playground serves people who live within easy reach than someone living across town. Therefore, service is dependent upon proximity and access. Appendix • Comfort and Convenience —The service provided by a component, such as a playground, is increased by having amenities such as shade, seating, and a restroom nearby. Comfort enhances the experience of using a component. Convenience encourages people to use an element, which increased the amount of service that it offers. Easy access and the availability of trash receptacles, bike racks, or nearby parking are examples of conveniences that enhance the service provided by a component. • Design and Ambience—Simple observation proves that places that "feel" right attract people. A sense of safety and security, pleasant surroundings, attractive views, and a sense of place impact ambiance. A well-designed park is preferable to a poorly designed one, enhancing its components' degree of service. This methodology records each component's geographic location, quantity, and capacity. Also, it uses comfort, convenience, and ambiance as characteristics that are part of the context and setting of a component. They are not characteristics of the element itself, but they enhance the value when they exist. Combining and analyzing each component's composite values makes it possible to measure the service provided by a parks and recreation system from various perspectives and for any given location. Typically, this begins with deciding on "relevant components," collecting an accurate inventory of those components, and analysis. Maps and tables represent the results of the GRASP® study. Making Justifiable Decisions GRASP® stores all data generated from the GRASP® evaluation in an electronic database. It is available and owned by the agency for use in various ways. The database tracks facilities and programs and can schedule services, maintenance, and components' replacement. In addition to determining LOS, it can project long-term capital and life-cycle costing needs. The GRASP® methodology provides accurate LOS and facility inventory information and integrates with other tools to help agencies decide. It is relatively easy to maintain, updatable, and creates easily understood graphic depictions of issues. Combined with a needs assessment, public and staff involvement, program, and financial assessment, GRASP® allows an agency to defensibly make recommendations on priorities for ongoing resource allocations along with capital and operational funding. 1 • Q Gtossary Addressing Low-Scoring Components Components whose functionality ranks below expectations are identified and scored with a "one." Find a list of these as extracted from the inventory dataset below. When raising the score of a component through improvement or replacement, the LOS is increased. The following is an outline strategy for addressing the repair/refurbishment/replacement or repurposing of low-functioning components. • Determine why the component is functioning below expectations. • Was it poorly conceived in the first place? • Is it something that was not needed? • Is it the wrong size, type, or configuration? • Is it poorly placed or located in a way that conflicts with other activities or detracts from its use? • Have the needs changed so that the component is now outdated, obsolete, or no longer needed? • Has it been damaged? • Has the component's maintenance been deferred or neglected to the point where it no longer functions as intended? • Does the component score low because it is not available to the public in a way that meets expectations? • Is the component old, outdated, or otherwise dysfunctional but has historical or sentimental value? An example would be an archaic structure in a park such as a stone barbecue grill that is not restorable to its original purpose but has historical significance. PARKS AND RECREATION I MASTER PLAN UPDATE Appendix Depending on the answers from the first step, select a strategy for addressing the low- functioning component: • Does the need for that type of element in its current location still exist? In that case, the feature should be repaired or replaced to match its original condition as much as possible. • If the need for that type of component has changed, replace it with a new one that fits the current requirements. • If a component is poorly located or poorly designed to start with, consider relocating, redesigning, or otherwise modifying it. • Remove a component because of changing demands unless it can be maintained in good condition without excessive expense or has historical or sentimental value. In- line hockey rinks may fall into this category. If it has been allowed to deteriorate because the community has no desire for in-line hockey, repurpose it into some other use. • Through ongoing public input and as needs and trends evolve, there may be the identification of new demands for existing parks. In that case, the decision may include removal or repurpose a current component, even if it is functional. • As tennis's popularity declined and demand for courts dropped off in some communities over recent decades, functional courts became skate parks or in-line rinks. In most cases, this was an interim use, intended to satisfy a short-term need until a decision to either construct a permanent facility or let the fad fade. The need for in-line rinks now seems to have diminished. In contrast, temporary skate parks or pickleball courts on tennis courts have now had permanent locations of their own. • One community repurposed a ball diamond into a dog park. The diamond is well- suited because it is already fenced. Combining the skinned infield where the dogs enter and natural grass in the outfield where traffic disperses. In time this facility either becomes a permanent facility or is constructed elsewhere. It could also turn out that dog parks fade in popularity and dog owners have other preferences. Meanwhile, the use of the diamond for this purpose is an excellent interim solution. 1 • Q Gtossary List of Low-Scoring Components and Modifiers Outdoor Low Scoring Components (The following components scored low during site visits) One softball,one baseball.These fields are not the CO21 Store Park Diamond Field 2 1 1 ualit of other fields in town C200 Reta Hus key Park Fitness Area 1 1 1 Minimal fitness equipment compared to others C270 Centennial Park Trail Access Point 1 1 1 Minimal C212 8th Street Park Trailhead 1 1 1 Less developed,but seems to be used as trailhead Low Scoring Outdoor Modifiers Red highlighted modifiers scored low. Green highlights show good or excellent quality at this location. Modifiers represented by N/A were not present at the time of site visits. These scores do not imply that all parks and facilities should have all modifiers but positively impact the user experience. 8th Street Park Nei hborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Bear Creek Park Communit 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 2 Centennial Park Mini 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Champion Park Neighborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 Chateau Park Neighborhood 2 2 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 2 City Hall Plaza Special Use 2 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Discovery Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 Fire Station No.4 Park Mini 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Fuller Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Generations Plaza Special Use 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 Gordon Harris Park Neighborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 Heroes Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 2 Hillsdale Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 Julius M.Kleiner Park Regional = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Keith Bird Legacy Park Neighborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 Lakeview Golf Course Golf 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 Meridian Swimming Pool Special Use 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Renaissance Park Nei hborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 2 Reta Huskey Park Neighborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 Seasons Park Neighborhood 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 Settlers Park Regional 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Storey Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 Ten Nile Trailhead Future 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0lFM 2 2 0 0 0 Tully Park Community 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 RECREATIONPARKS AND • Appendix Level of Service Improvements Addressing Lower and No Service Areas One way of using the GRASP® Perspectives is to prioritize identified gap areas. For example, several regions with low or no service were identified in the walkable access analysis. Future growth or subdivision development may significantly impact future gap areas. Further investigations of these areas can help when prioritizing future improvements or recreation opportunities. Prioritization of improvements may consider multiple factors, including providing maximum impact to the highest number of residents. Social equity factors, such as average household income, could also influence priorities. Component Inventory and Assessment Maintaining and improving existing facilities typically ranks very high in public input. Existing features that fall short of expectations should be enhanced to address this concern. Components have been assessed based on condition and. Identify and treat those with low scores, as explained below. The assessment should be updated regularly to assure the upgrade or improvements of components affected by wear and tear over time. Addressing Low-Scoring Components • Low Scoring Components (discussed previously) • Booster Components One way to enhance service is by adding components at specific park sites or recreation facilities to "boost" the score of a park or area. These are most effective in low-service areas where parks exist that have space for additional features. • High Demand Components The statistically valid survey asks respondents to rank facilities by importance based on those that needed to add or improve. Many of these needs may be addressed by upgrading facilities, retrofitting lesser used assets, and adding components that could serve as future program opportunities. Consider these high-demand components when adding new elements to the system. 1 • Q Gtossary Trends in Parks and Recreation Trends to consider when deciding what to do with low-functioning facilities, or improving existing parks to serve the needs of residents, include things like: Dog parks continue to grow in popularity and may be related to an aging demographic in America. It is also a basic form of socializing for people who may have once socialized with other parents in their child's soccer league. Now that the kids are grown, they enjoy the company of other dog owners at the dog park. And for singles, a dog park is an excellent place to meet people. Meridian has dog parks at Storey Park and Discovery Park. Skateboarding and other wheel sports continue to grow in popularity. Distributing skating features throughout the community provides greater access to this activity for younger people who cannot drive to a more extensive centralized skate park. Add skate features to neighborhood parks in place of larger skate parks. Tully Park has a skate park in addition to the adjacent, Boise skatepark at C.F.McDevitt Park A desire for locally-grown food and concerns about health, sustainability, and other issues leads to community food gardens in parks and other public spaces. Julius M. Kleiner Park has a community garden. Events in parks, from a neighborhood "movie in the park" to large festivals in regional parks, are growing in popularity to build a sense of community and generate revenues. Providing spaces for these could become a trend. Meridian has identified event spaces at City Hall Plaza, Generations Plaza, Julius M. Kleiner Park and Discovery Park. Spraygrounds are growing in popularity, even in colder climates. An extensive and growing selection of products raises the bar on expectations and offers new possibilities for creative facilities. Meridian has spray pads at Generations Plaza, Settlers Park, Julius M. Kleiner Park, Hillsdale Park, and Discovery Park New playgrounds are emerging, including discovery, nature, adventure, and even inter- generational play. Some of these rely upon movable parts, supervised play areas, and other variations from the standard fixed "post and platform" playgrounds found in the typical park across America. These types of nature-based opportunities help connect children and families to the outdoors. Integrating nature into parks by creating natural areas is a trend for many reasons. These include a desire to make parks more sustainable and introduce people of all ages to the natural environment. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Parks & Recreation System Map Meridian, Idaho �, E IDIAN 'q .wHo r Legend J� I- J - Willow Creek — — Indoor Facility Keith ILh__� y h Keith Birdp7 Elementa ' J -� Park ry Paramount. _ f '\.Existing Trail/Pathway Legacy Pa ��L-Heroes Elementary Proposed - - - `_Park r z i - 9 AIIIIIIIIIIIII Trail/Pathway �� � � H'erita a Middle .-� , 9 C.F.McDevitt Freeway/Interstate School Ball Fields Park Mc illan Heritage I - Highway Middle SchoolM Park Cottonwood _Major Street/Road Cameron - Other Street/Road - Rreta Huskey Park - _ - _ Park Edna Lake/River/Stream - i — l iChamplon i City of Meridian r - Settlers PtrkUstick l , Ten Mile Park- --- -- - Boise Seasons - r Trailhead / '^ - Western Ada School Park_ Tully'Par , --- r District i T'keview - = 4ulius M.KI iner r oif a Chateau 8th Street Park Park i Bureau of Reclamation - Park Settlers L Meridian - i School t M'eridian Village Park j ,,- Kerry Library `, f Meridian Pedestrian Barriers f�egional Bark-r r - ' r- HOA Parks Meridian Middle School Fairview -Senior Center, _ Property - ' F. '-. 1 _ Meridian City Limit �� - C�o�le Valley Christian-School uller `7 Boys&Girls Club 20 J f Meridian Communi Center Park ° __ ty r rations Plaza —(- - - �� Ce ten al Park "- - �r=-_-'-cityHall - -' p Meridian- 0 OHomecourt ice' �i Chamber �� �Icademy� -- Commerce \ - Meridian _ , -� L_ Franklin ; -� - S imming Pool -� > millan tarey lrk _ ° _ -*---j r-- Sycamore 55 _ -�Ih Park n _ - do _ ,• Ustick Jabil ---- ar- -` Overland - E_� GordonHarns Peppermint , � Li Fairvi - W -- - rBearCreek Park Park i _ D Park Victory \ I Fire Station Emerald ti Middle School _ No.4 Park"�,- � --- Victory _ i Overland Renaissance Park N l �--2 MAY 69 l W E n ��_ YMCA -- --- L� Hillsdale S A \ Park 69 0 1/2 1 2 teI— Miles L Map Produced For City of Meridian-By The GRASP®Team L' -' This Map Is Intended For Planning&Discussion Purposes Only- -I Please Refer To The Project Document For Map Details k Lake Hazel Legend-Inset Map Legend Elements May Vary Slightly In Size,Color &Transparency From Those Shown On Map I O Pedestrian Barriers GIS Data Sources May Include: - Meridian City Limit City of Meridian,ESRI,GRASP®Team-January 2022 Copyright©2022 Meridian ________ Columbia I Columbia THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Walkable Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Meridian, Idaho , ----- ,IJ' , Meridian Service Legend with HOA Parks - -� 20- s 3 --- ------- - GRASP®Gap Analysis Willow Creek -- ��-I _ zo �� —® Keith Bird Elements - �� �_ - Target:86.47- Keith Elementary Paramount a j Legacy Park - =i I Meets or Exceeds P l - -�-Hero�s �- Elementary - Target r L F 0 ❑ , k r - o ¢]��_ _ l Q d o.°� ��Qo-fi:, Mc illan -- Below Target r- �� 1 1 ' Merits a Middle g C.F.McDevitt u n ( j �r , Park Mc illan No Access within 10 _ _J �I School Ball Fields + i bsNb min walk ' Heritage rrM Cottonwood I r I- Middle School = parkIndoor Facility `1 , 11 "�-__` rCameron ,�Existing i '' Ca,erry .L a�-------- _ _ r 55 Park Ed Trail/Pathway avwe o Reta Huskey Park - _ _ na L-,a fly, ,.IProposed a d s r Park Champion j ust Trail/Pathway ' - -� Settle' ,� ick ran m Ten Mile =Freeway I Interstate � Trailhead 1 j_' ��� _�--�' �-� , I I_ a �Highway Se O -._ - �� ter.—__red verand Park �'TullyIFark Major Street/Road 4 ° 1 d hChateau 8 h street Park w ius .Kleiner _ °L / If Course p k i Le end r p f Other Street/Road Park f Settlers ( I 9 Meridian-- � -ifj ory( victory Village Park Lake/River/Stream c at Meridiafi Libra �I __ GRASP®LOS herry Library endian Regional Park 1 --,2FS ,-9i ior-center• City of Meridian Range:0 to 680 g Meridian Middle School \ Fairview I � y 9 \ � a � ➢- ��-,� Property �J Cole Valley Christian School I� i Boise No Access within 10 `I'�- ' - �� d ��` .- FUller Boys)&Girl,Club J� ' min walk I- 69 ° -7 9 q-I �J Park Meridian Community Center Western Ada School -, '- t -'I Generations Plazarti;-- f ` District Less Access within -�= — I -• CentennialPark I 10 min walk 1----- City Hall L Li Bureau of 1 J rl Meridian = Reclamation T I 1 �F� OHomecourt Chamber of �IIcademy ��-�- Commerce - - School Greater Access 1 Meridian L_ � Franklin _ Swimming o within 10 min walk i _-'� Stcirev.Park i!-7 -T Sycamore HOA Parksg _ -- -- U oumbia I � I, r Park Meridian City Limit 1 1 _ �,_r ,_r Meridian Service -- h Jabil y� r _ _ Overland - r' I J .� ® 1J Mc illan _ Gordon I-ari�is Peppermint , - Park Park Bear Ci;eek --- 1 I` r _ U - �stic .. VictoryiPark c- � -- _ Statio ®T N�lo 4,Park Victory �_� �, O e` Middle School _ I i -' Cherry �, a auvi,ew a ^` Q _ I� _Park L.—J �' L r1drKlin � �= tiL---r _ 69 Ir - m verand— �\ i YMCA W E --- --- -�\ - m Legend-Inset Map L GRASP®LOS Hills Bale r1 J L Victory-Uj ory( S r j �� Pzlrk Range:0 to 644 1 - �_ �� 0 1/22 -- I No Access within 10 �lT f C 7lJ min walk _I ,z_ - L z Miles I_ I -L - - ° 1 ---- Less Access within Map Produced For City of Meridian-By The GRASP®Team r 10 min walk - This Map Is Intended For Planning&Discussion Purposes Only- �$ry J 1 Please Refer To The Project Document For Map Details I 1 ,� k ��' Legend Elements May Vary Slightly In Size,Color -�--_J !-1 ------- G rl T Greater Access &Transparency From Those Shown On Map J GIS Data Sources May Include: within 10 min walk J City of Meridian,ESRI,GRASP®Team-January 2022 pp 1 \ -- Copyright©2022Meridian I ______ Cblumbi oumbia THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Neighborhood Access to Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Meridian, Idaho r, ---- Meridian Service Legend with HOA Parks 20 -- �- - --- -� --��--�---; �GRASP®Gap Analysis ��� _ so / -- - �- Willow -.eek — Tar et:86.4 -r 'J�o� Keith Bird �le► enta, q,l - ,� g �,I° ° r --- ❑ "mount. a - Legaey,P f Meets or Exceeds p CS o r}e p l I_ ��Homes c'a mentary -- Target El -� I �Par k�l t l z _ Q f ' c an - 1 - - 7=1 i I_ Below Target - -r Ji a Q ^S-- n i H�iritage 1'niildle C.F.McDevitt ss - n St he of s�ii Fields No Access within 1 ustl A -i Park Mc illan mile c-° k �u _ Heritage �f t�-opt7777, oF , f / t t -rr�+� Cottonwood r- -- J Middle School Park Indoor Facility n1,_J \� sl - �. I -- ----I t _ 1 '1 I 1 .� V r---❑ Cameron ,ti Existing ra erry a I_ -- --- ---- ---� F' J o Fairview -o 5 Trail/Pathway - - _- ` C 5 Park Edna - I� Reta Huskey Park - - � _ � � -I - ----- i - Proposed i �S lersi i Champion Trail/Pathway - Park Ustick Franklin _ --- =Freeway i Interstate I _ - - Ten Mile 1__I � y r Trailhead / '-- ��� Seasons - r �r �_- �' - - - = Highway verland ^ Park Tully Fark� L Al r —Major Street/Road 't - LakeviewJPark C - = JuIius41.KI ner 1 - u 8th Street Pa:4; �eaR r Golf Cours park ( Other Street/Road - -1 VI ory( Victory r Settlers L Legend T, 1) F ,� Meridian-- T@'iplage Park I Lake/River River/ R , Wt Meridian i 1 v ►y I Meridian GRASPO LOS --- L. a�- I Libra Regional Park - r�enioi-Center-i City of Meridian Range:0 to 683 9 \g _ Meridian.Middle Scher 1, `\ Fairview Property Cole Valley Christian School i Boise No Access within 1 `I' - - -°ffl , 9 ' ' �WF_ullBoys&Girls Clb d� - mile - l' q1 J � 1 r I Mendtan Cun tmunity Center Western Ada School Gei��r`ons Plaza r�r-Ji—� J Less Access within 1 District I - -- - � - City H' I I _ -Certennial�Park �� Bureau of mile - rMeridian 1, Reclamation I J I �Ho e- url -4,hamber f' �j Asade►ny �- Meridian mmerce _ Franklin L :12; School Greater Access y - Swimmin ooI L F _' within 1 mile I ! g orey�P rk--] I- . - HOA Parks Cola bia I �- Sycamore , Park �� Meridian City Limit ��� Meridian Service IU r _ _ Overland , p i r IF G- ordon[1arr-is Peppermint ? � Q Q 1- Mcr iillan S Park Park F� � 55 = \l! r Ean - ------/ Bear Clef k - Park N lficto - ry / _ t � Fire StaUo Middle School - J _J - a4 Park Victory ► 7�1 a t i - J Cherry 'b. — Fairvi,e JLi 1 -- '­F � r^ o U Remiss ::ce--- - r Park � ranklin N 4 T rz verland '^ F, -� YMCA W E _ (_ - I-�,\ Legend-Inset Map -- J GRASP®LOS � J ° Victor Ils'tale v S Park Range:0 to 600 I - No Access within 1 ;�� T t a� 0 1/21 2 _ _ A mile �l :z_�- I, z �� Miles - _ - L I� i - _ ❑ qv-1 �� Less Access within 1 �i l`w Map Produced For City of Meridian-By The GRASP®Team \ mile This Map Is Intended For Planning&Discussion Purposes Only- ��I ---, 1 i -ovE:ry Please Refer To The Project Document For Map Details , Legend Elements May Vary Slightly In Size,Color - r �I -�-- -A\ Greater Access � FI &Transparency From Those Shown On Map \ within 1 mile - - j GIS Data Sources May Include: - City of Meridian,ESRI,GRASP®Team-January 2022 I I�l; C blumbi colun,bia I --- Copyright©2022 Meridian I _-_� 1111 APPENDIX B - GENERAL , MAINTENANCE N D FOR ' QUALITY PARKS IN MERIDIAN , •.T 4 _ Ar L k 1 ] 3 � 'F •� �I 1 1 '� � ' rJ :�• 1 �1 TTF4 k - e. art� ' + 150 City of Meridian, Idaho ' �' a. Generat Maintenance Standards for • Facitities These sample maintenance standards are meant to be a starting point for the department to review and consider as a basic desired maintenance standards for all parks and recreational facilities. Parks Grounds • Grounds mowed and trimmed on a regular schedule • Park is free of litter, debris, and hazards • Parking lots, if applicable, are clean; striped; and free of debris, holes, and tripping hazards Drinking Fountains (where applicable) • Fountains are accessible and operational • Fountains are in appropriate locations and in compliance with ADA • Fountains are installed on a solid surface and free of standing water and debris • Drain system is operational Signage • Park identification signs are secure and properly installed in a noticeable location • Handicapped parking signs are secure, visible, and installed to code • Park rules signs are secure and properly installed in a noticeable location • Restroom signs are secure and visible • Signs are clean, painted, and free of protrusions and graffiti • Directional signs provided as needed in appropriate locations • Signs include City logo and contact phone number Ornamental Plants and Trees • Plants and trees are healthy and free of disease and insects • Plant beds are free of litter, debris, and weeds • Plant selection is appropriate for season and area usage • Trees trimmed and shaped on a regular basis, inspect for, and remove hazardous trees as needed • Tree species selection should provide a wide variety of native and selected non- native trees where appropriate • Tree wells and planting beds mulched for protection and water conservation Appendix Walkways and Trails • May be hard surface or soft surface depending on location and intended use • Soft surface trails are free of water collecting depressions and erosion • Walkways and trails have a uniform surface, positive drainage, are level with ground and free of trip hazards and excessive material deflection • Walkways and trails are free of litter, debris, sediment, and seasonal snow • Walkways and trails meet ADA requirements • Walkways and trails provide unobstructed access and are free from low and protruding tree limbs, guide wires, signposts, and ornamental plants • Walkways in irrigated park areas are neatly edged • Walkways and trails are clear of weeds and grass growth in cracks and expansion joints; adequate trash receptacles provided • Guard rails and safety fencing provided in appropriate locations • Routine safety and function inspections are performed including surface, culverts, water crossings, signage, and vegetation Trash Receptacles (random locations) • Receptacles are clean and free of odor with liners in place • Receptacles are painted, free of damage and missing parts, and properly anchored • Roll-off containers and dumpsters are clean, screened, and placed in non-intrusive locations • Area around trash receptacles is clean and free of trash and debris • Area around roll-off containers and dumpsters is clean and free of trash and debris Fencing • Fences are intact, structurally sound, and free of damage or deterioration • Nails, bolts, and screws are flush with surface with no exposed sharp points • Fences have no excessive voids, cracks, or splintering Security and Exterior Lights • 90% of security and exterior lights are operational • No electrical conducting wires are exposed • Lights comply with appropriate building code • Poles and components are secured in ground, operational and straight Bridges • Bridges have a uniform surface, are free of trip hazards, and are free of graffiti • Lumber and other materials are structurally sound, free of cracking deterioration and splintering • Bridges comply with ADA requirements • Bridges have handrails intact and properly installed and anchored • Bridges are free of litter and debris Generat Maintenance Standards for • Facitities General Use Turf Areas • Turf areas are free of litter and debris • Turf areas are mowed and trimmed on a regular schedule • Turf areas have a uniform surface and are well drained • Areas have clean trash receptacles present that are in good condition • Turf is free of disease, insects, and weeds • Supplemental irrigation is provided as needed • Turf areas are fertilized and aerated on a regular basis Athletic Use Turf Areas • Turf areas are free of litter and debris • Turf areas are mowed and trimmed according to usage schedule • Turf areas have a uniform surface and are well drained • Playing surface maintained according to sport specific guidelines • Areas have clean trash receptacles present that are in good condition • Turf is free of disease, insects, and weeds • Supplemental irrigation is provided as needed • Turf areas are fertilized and aerated on a regular basis Irrigation • Irrigation system is fully operational with complete and uniform coverage • System is free of leaks; backflow prevention devices are in place and functioning properly • Heads are installed properly for intended use • Heads are properly adjusted with rotations and arcs to set to reduce water runoff • Systems are set to run at specific times to minimize evaporation and waste • Systems function checks are conducted on a regular basis • Repair excavations are properly compacted, and turf restored Open Space Areas • Native grasses mowed, if necessary, according to specific management plans, with focus on promoting natural growth heights and cycles and wildlife habitat • Trail corridors and picnic areas mowed as needed • Trail surfaces are free of debris and weeds • Native tree and shrub growth are encouraged • Wildlife habitat and water quality preservation emphasized • Rules and regulations and identification signs are posted in noticeable locations • Annual and noxious weeds are controlled as needed • Property access points and boundaries are clearly marked Appendix Athletic Facilities and Competitive Play Fields Turf • Turf has a healthy dense stand of grass and coverage is no less than 95 percent of playable area • Play area has a uniform surface and is well drained • Turf to be mowed at the appropriate height for the type of grass used, time of season, and type of field use • Turf is free of any litter or debris • Apply top dressing and over seeding as needed to maintain healthy grass • Fields may be closed for use periodically to allow for turf recovery • Turf is free of disease, insects, and weeds Softball Infields • Infields have a uniform surface and are free of lips, holes, and trip hazards • Infields are well drained with no standing water areas • Infields have proper soil composition for intended use with ball field mix added as needed • Infields are free of weeds and grass • Infields are free of rocks, dirt clods, and debris • Bases and plates are properly installed, level, and are at proper distances and anchored according to manufacturer's specifications and league requirements • Fields dragged and lined as needed according to use schedules Bleachers • Hardware is intact, and bracing and safety rails tightly connected • Seating surface is clean, smooth, free of protrusions and have no exposed sharp edges or pointed corners • Clean trash receptacles provided and in good condition, area under bleachers free of trash Lights • Electrical system and components are operational and in compliance with applicable building codes • 90% of lamps for each field are operational • No electrical conducting wires exposed • Ballast boxes and components are properly installed and secured • Lights provide uniform coverage on facilities and fixtures and are adjusted to eliminate dark or blind areas • Fixtures securely fastened to poles and poles secured in ground according to manufacturer's specifications • Poles and fixtures inspected immediately after any major wind, ice, or hailstorm Generat Maintenance Standards forand Facitities Fencing • Fencing material is galvanized chin link and appropriate gauge wire for specified use • Fencing material is properly secured to support rails • Support rails are properly connected and straight • Fencing is free of holes and protrusions • Fabric is straight and free of bending and sagging • Gates and latches are operational Restrooms/Portable Toilets • Toilets are clean, sanitary, and properly stocked with paper products • Lights and ventilation systems are operational • Toilets, stall doors, and hand air dryers are operational • Buildings and enclosures are free of graffiti • Doors are properly marked according to gender • Restrooms have clean trash receptacles • All doors and locks are operational • Restrooms/portable toilets are in compliance with ADA requirements • All restrooms stocked with hand sanitizer Appendix Playgrounds Play Equipment • Equipment and surrounding play areas meet ASTM and National Playground Safety Institute (NPSI) standards • Play equipment and hardware is intact • Play equipment is free of graffiti • Age appropriateness for equipment is noted with proper signage • Regular inspection and repair program is in place and enforced Surfacing • Fall surface is clean, level, and free of debris • Fall surface meets ASTM and NPSI standards • Fall surface is well drained • Rubber cushion surfaces are free of holes and tears • Rubber cushion surfaces are secure to base material and curbing Borders • Playground borders are well defined and intact • Playground borders meet ASTM and NPSI standards Decks • Planks are intact, smooth, structurally sound, free of splinters and no cracks greater than '/4 inch • Nails, bolts, and screws are flush with surface • Planks are level with no excessive warping General • Slides and climbing devices are properly anchored • All moving parts are properly lubricated and functioning as intended • S-hooks and swing seats are in good operating condition • Damaged or under repair equipment is removed or properly marked and isolated from public use until repaired • Playgrounds should adhere to the Americans with Disabilities Act standards Generat Maintenance Standards for • Facitities Picnic Areas and Shelters General • Access to facilities complies with ADA • Shelters are clean, sanitary, and free of graffiti • Lights and electrical plugs are operational and comply with appropriate building codes • Vegetation around structure is trimmed back to reduce hazards and does not impede entry and egress • Grounds around structure are mowed, trimmed and free of litter, debris, and hazards • Shelters are structurally sound, clean, painted with no rotted lumber or rusted metal and no loose siding or loose shingles • Water fountains and hose bibs (if provided) are operational • Signage and rules and regulations information are posted in a noticeable location Tables • Tables are clean, free of dust, mildew, and graffiti • Table hardware is intact • Table frames are intact, and slats are properly secured • Table seats and tops are smooth with no protrusions and have no exposed sharp edges or pointed corners Grills • Grills are operational and free of rust and metal deterioration • Grills are clean and free of grease build-up • Grill racks are operational and secure, and grills are properly anchored to reduce hazard and theft Trash Receptacles • Receptacles are clean, free of odors and liners in place • Receptacles are painted, free of damaged or missing parts and properly anchored • Area around receptacles is clean and free of trash and debris Appendix Tennis Courts Surfacing • Surface is smooth, level, and well drained with no standing water • Surface is free of large cracks, holes, and trip hazards • Surface is painted and striped in accordance with U.S. Tennis Association court specifications and for Pickle ball where appropriate • Worn painted surfaces do not exceed 30 percent of total court surface • Surface is free of litter, debris, gravel, and graffiti Nets • Nets and wind screens are free of tears and frays • Nets are properly installed and secured to support poles • Nets have center stripes installed at the regulated height and are anchored to the court • Support poles have hardware intact and are properly anchored and installed • Wind screens are properly installed and secured to fencing Fencing • Fencing is galvanized chain link and is the appropriate gauge wire for specified use • Fencing material is properly secured to support rails • Support rails are properly secured and straight • Fencing is free of holes, protrusions, and catch points • Fabric is straight and free of bending or sagging • Gates and latches are operational • Windscreens are tightly secured and free of tears and holes Generat Maintenance Standards for • Facitities Outdoor Basketball Courts Surfacing • Surface is smooth, level, well drained, and free of standing water • Surface is free of large cracks, holes, and tripping hazards • Surface is painted and striped per court specifications • Surface is free of litter, debris, gravel, and graffiti Goals and Backboards • Goals and backboards are level with hardware intact • Goals and backboard are painted • Nets are properly hung and free of tears and fraying • Support poles are secure in ground and straight Sand Volleyball Courts Nets • Nets are free from holes and are not torn or tattered • Nets are hung tightly at specified height • Nets are securely attached to support poles • Support poles have hardware intact, are properly anchored and installed Sand Surface • Court surface is loose sand • Surface is smooth with good drainage and no standing water • Surface is free of weeds, grass, debris, and litter Borders • Borders are well defined and intact • Borders meet International Volleyball Federation (FIVB), ASTM and NPSI standards • Surrounding area is free of debris and encroaching landscaping to reduce hazard Appendix Ponds and Lakes Water • Aerators, if provided, are operational • Pond surface is at least 90% free of vegetation • Water area is free of trash and debris • Bank areas are smooth and free of washouts and erosion, rip rap in place where needed • Ponds and lakes, where appropriate, are stocked with appropriate species of fish • Inlet and outlet structures are operational • Appropriate and seasonal rules and regulations signage is in place at noticeable locations Fishing Piers and Decks • Planks are intact, smooth, structurally sound, free of splinters and have no cracks greater than '/4 inch • Nails, bolts, and screws are flush with surface • Planks are level with no excessive warping • Handrails are present and structurally sound • Piers and decks comply with ADA • Trash receptacles provided nearby Benches • Hardware is intact and structurally sound • Nails, bolts, or screws are flush with surface • Seats and backing are smooth with no protrusions, have no sharp edges or pointed corners, and are structurally sound • Benches are secured in ground and properly installed Generat Maintenance Standards forand Facitities PARKS • RECREATION I MASTER PLAN UPDATE E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 23-2371: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Patrick Grace to Seat 6 of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 23-2371 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, OVERTON, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, REAPPOINTING PATRICK GRACE TO SEAT 6 OF THE MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian City Code 2-1-1 establishes the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems the reappointment of Patrick Grace to Seat 6 of the Planning&Zoning Commission to be in the best interest of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and of the City of Meridian. NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-1-1, Patrick Grace is hereby reappointed to Seat 6 of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, with a term to expire January 31, 2026. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 7th day of February, 2023. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 71h day of February, 2023. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk REAPPOINTMENT OF PATRICK GRACE-MERIDIAN PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian December 2022 Financial Report City of Meridian Monthly Financial Report FY2023 December 2022 Table of Contents Report Name Page Number Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 r! II i �■ r �■ '■� ■ f �IAkd T � n i a ,, 7r�1��ulu�iwulllsii �mirni t II r ie�► irr _ - - NOMET wwwwwwwwwn �E ID� F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2023\FY23 -3 Dec Council Report 1 of 3 Monthly Financial Report �E IDIAN^- FY2023 December 2022 City of Meridian Investment Portfolio Yield by Investment Type IDAHO STATE POOL 3.01% IDAHO BOND FUND 2.70% CASH 0.00% F I B 2.89% •FIB MoneyMarket$1,666,592 -Cash$17,181,265 MONEYMARKET •Idaho Bond Fund$72,737,876 •Idaho State Pool$119,689,116 City of Meridian Interest/Investment Income City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $800,000 $110,000,000 $700,000 — $600,000 — $1os,000,000 $500,000 — $400,000 $100,000,000 $300,000 $95,000,000 $200,000 $100,000 $90,000,000 $a General Enterprise $85,000,000 General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YTD ■FY23 ■FY22 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2023\FY23-3 Dec Council Report 2 of 3 Monthly Financial Report FY2023 Ci�fIERIDIAN*,-, December 2022 IDAHO GENERAL FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 -- 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 ■Nonspendable ■Restricted ■Committed ■Assigned ■Assigned Reserves ■Unassigned ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 -- $20,000,000 - lam $10,000,000 ---- m,,. - . $ 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 ■Assigned ■Unassigned ■Assinned Reserves F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2023\FY23-3 Dec Council Report 3 of 3 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Ada County Highway District Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 24, 2021 Presenter: Miranda Carson Estimated Time: 20 minutes Topic: Community Development: ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities On November 15th,the City received a letter from ACHD notifying us that work was starting on the FY2024-2028 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP).Annually, the City prepares transportation priority lists for the transportation agencies to consider in their programming and budget processes. Over the past few months, the Transportation Commission has reviewed the prioritization of roadway and intersection projects and Community Programs (CP) projects (e.g. - sidewalks). The Transportation Commission recommends the attached prioritization. After Council consideration and approval, the finalized request form will be sent to ACHD. ACHD is requesting all project requests be submitted no later than February 15th, 2023. The full ACHD project webpage is here: https:IZengage.achdidaho.org/integrated-five-year-work- nlan-ifywp?tool=map#tool tab Attachments: ACHD Prioritization Request Form City Roadways and Intersections Projects Map City Community Programs Projects Map 2023 Roadway & Intersection Priorities Legend 0 0.25D.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 iles 0 V Area of Impact ,� L Future Roads `` _ ^ 10 4t,� ■ Banbury Golf Club • • ■ PW 0 ■ E RA J '1H ..... z IL � o41 -' 0 i k ■ � ■ el Mmr cilan ® ; 55 17 ■ 0 - ■ L . 6/L1�JU�JIA]U M ® men ` O �i ■ :I ■ � . . . �� r ■ UI ■ ul R ■ i �( ■M M 0 M■ ■ ffi ■ s, ■ ( ll I UI The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources ■ — and is subject to constant revision.The City of Meridian makes no ■ warranty or guarantee as to the content, accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. E Print Date: 1/12/2023 2023 Community Program Priorities Legend 0 0.20.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 Miles j q Area of Impact -.. Spurwing Club Project Type Country Club Community Programs Bikeway Projects (colors vary) �i ■ zl Gr ■ o o: a: .0 5 OI F i r- I IF IAI • �JUCMN 1 Li CII If ■ z I \AI.+VA1/VLAJLAYZa.IV C C-....1.1:.. [J C C__.I,1:._ DJ ■ ul �'\CI cS 55 ul _\ zi �V a � •I _ , li ■ G I IrC I ■ V �� ■ F DA ■ � z \./1GL1]71J''1II\JJlrtr��(O:IJJI�LL'•AAJ]]�\UU•/!' 1 t� (i r GT! ■ � ul ■ Zi u� a; N ■ � u n ■ �0 ■ u M iL © ■ II ■1A/,&.'a., DJ \ ■ \A/ A.«:a., D C A....:a.. D� ■ -■ ' ■ + ♦ ■ u�1 0 7 O 0: ■ ■ F6?I o: ■ The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision. The City of Meridian makes no u I ■ warranty or guarantee as to the content, accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. OME I Print Date: 1/12/2023 City of Meridian 2023 Prioritization DRAFT Parks preferred WASD preferred Non-ACHD Projects Meridian Staff 2023 Tr.. Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 04oLOMMENTS ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name U laze Roads & Intersections Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes. Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes and construct a new 4-lane 1-84 overpass,including curb, ACHD to coordinate with ITD on request. Project gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Project would be a to move forward when funding partnership is 1 1 Linder Rd, Overland Rd/Franklin Rd joint project between ACHD and ITD 1 2022 Future Future possible. Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes in 2020- construction began Dec 2 Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2019 1 2021 2023 2022 Project programmed to be constructed in 2023. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 or 5 lanes with curb, gutter,sidewalk, and bike lanes in Locust Grove Corridor B:Locust Grove Rd, 3 3-1 Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP.Include enhanced crossing at Chateau Dr. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd Widen intersection to 9 lanes on Fairview Ave and 7 lanes on Locust Grove Rd, 2020- 2022- 4 4 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2021 2023 2025 Project programmed to be constructed in 2025. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance Victory Corridor A:Victory Rd,Locust Grove 5 6 Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd with the 2016 CIP. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Rd/Eagle Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. 6 7 Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/ Linder Rd with the 2016 CIP. 2022 2023 2024 Concept Study in 2021. Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Widen Linder Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance 2026- Project programmed to be designed in 2025. North Meridian Improvements A:Linder Rd, 7 Linder Rd, CherryLn/Ustick Rd with 2016 CIP. 2025 2027 Future Concept Study in 2022. Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. Locust Grove Corridor B:Locust Grove Rd, 8 Locust Grove Rd,AmityRd/Victo Rd Include crossings at Palermo and Wrightwood. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance Victory Corridor A:Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian 9 Victory Rd, Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd with the 2016 CIP. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Rd)/Locust Grove Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible North Meridian Improvements B:Cherry Ln 10 11 Ten Mile Rd/Cherry Ln Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. and Ten Mile Rd South Meridian Improvements B:Overland Rd 11 12 Eagle Rd/Overland Rd Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes. Future Future Future Concept Study in 2023. and Eagle Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible McMillan Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust 12 13 0 McMillan Rd, Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Grove Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Install an enhanced crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) and widened shoulders on McMillan Road at the Summit Way intersection in order for pedestrians/bicyclists traveling along To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 13 14 McMillan Rd, Linder Rd/Meridian Rd local roads to access Settlers Park. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Linder Rd/SH 69(Meridian Rd) Construct a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes on Locust Grove legs and 1 lane on 2019- 2020- construction began Dec 14 15 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Victory legs in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2020 2021 2023 2022 Project programmed to be constructed in 2023. Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Install an enhanced crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon)on Locust Grove Road at Heritage Park Street,access for Meridian Technical 15 16 Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Charter High School 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Locust Grove Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Meridian Rd at/near 16 17 Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Settlers Park entrance and Sundance Subdivision micropath. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd 17 18 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Construct a dual lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2022 2023 2024 Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd 18 19 Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. 2022 2023 2024 Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. Ustick Rd,Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Rd 19 NEW Amity, Meridian to Locust Grove Add pedestrian/bike facilities with widening. Widen black Cat to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities.Include To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 20 62 Black Cat, Franklin to Cherry enhanced RR crosing. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Blact Cat Rd,Franklin Rd/Cherry Ln Widen intersection to 5/6 lanes on Black Cat Rd and 5 lanes on Cherry Ln in Supports Cherry Park Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 21 28 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. being built in 2027 Reevaluate as conditions change. 1 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Page 1 of 8 2023 , M t C ransporta Jion U) FP6- __J! ericlian Staff COMMENI ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name Supports Cherry Park Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not a 22 44 Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 5 lanes on Cherry. being built in 2027 2020 CIP project. Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Supports Cherry Park 23 NEW Cherry, Black Cat to McDermott Widen Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. being built in 2027 Fairview Ave, SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 24 29 Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Fairview Ave,SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Rd Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 25 32 Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Fairview Ave,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 26 37 Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Reevaluate as conditions change. Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen intersection to 3/4 lanes on Amity and 314 lanes on Black Cat in accordance Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 27 41 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 28 42 McMillan Rd and Star Rd Construct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. McMillan Rd and Star Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 29 43 Amity Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Amity Rd and Linder Rd NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Widen and improve pedestrian facilities. Some segments are already planned for Project being done for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. improvement; having the full block complete would provide better connections to through CDA with Part of this will be built out as a Coperative 30 20 Lake Hazel, Locust Grove to Eagle adjacent development and amenities. Brighton Development Agreement(CDA). Lake Hazel Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Based on a recent Linder Corridor capacity analysis by a consultant "estimated to operate at an acceptable LOS until Widen intersection to 4 lanes Linder Rd and 5/6 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance with 2050" when Linder is To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 31 27 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd the 2016 CIP. widened to 3 lanes. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Project to be implemented through development. Improve safety and traffic operations along Fairview Ave in accordance with the ACHD and Meridian to coordinate Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Strategy. Project may include bicycle and Lower priority than other implementation as development applications are Fairview Ave Corridor Management Linder Rd 32 34 Rd/Orchard St pedestrian facilities and other access management treatments. unprogrammed requests. processed. /Orchard St Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St/Fairview sidewalk, and improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in This will come with Defer until completion of Phase 1 (Franklin to East03rd St Extension,Carlton St/Fairview 33 38 Ave(Phase 2) accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. development. Carlton). Ave Extend roadway from its current terminus at NE 6th Street to Stonehenge Way/ Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension, East Commercial Drive and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, This will come with Defer. To be considered as properties Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension,06th St/ 34 39 06th St/Locust Grove Rd sidewalk. development. redevelopment. Locust Grove Rd Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance Meridian Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20/26 35 21 Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd/Chinden Blvd with the 2016 CIP. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. (Chinden Blvd) Widen and signalize intersection to 4/5 lanes on Eagle and 315 lanes on Lake in 2022- 36 22 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2020 2023 2024 Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Victory Corridor D:Victory Rd,Linder Rd/SH 37 24 Victory, Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. 69(Meridian Rd) Franklin Corridor A:Franklin Rd,McDermott 38 25 Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Linder Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Cross section to be determined Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 44 through concept design. Project includes bridges#1078, #2033, #2034, #2035, and 2024- Project programmed to be designed in 2024- Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 44 39 30 (State St) #2036.Include bike and pedestrian facilities in this project. 2025 2026 Future 2025. (State St) Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd/SH 55 Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in 2020- 2022- Fairview Ave,Locust Grove Rd/SH 55(Eagle 40 31 Eagle Rd) laccorclance with the 2016 CIP. 2021 2023 2025 Project programmed to be constructed in 2025. Rd) 2021- Project programmed to be designed in 2021- 41 401 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Construct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2022 2022 Future 2022. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Page 2 of 8 0kommission Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0) 0 ridian Staff OMMEN ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name Lower priority than other unprogrammed requests. 42 New Meridian/Overland Signal improvements to the intersection Leave in high 40s. Project programmed to be constructed in the North Meridian Improvements B:Franklin Rd 43 45 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Future Future Future Future. and McDermott Rd Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 4 lanes on Ustick in accordance with 44 46 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd the 2016 CIP. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on McDermott and 3 lanes on in Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 45 47 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 46 48 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Ustick Rd and Star Rd Does not currently meet warrants. ACHD to 47 49 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Signalize intersection. reevaluate as development occurs in the area. Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Project to be built through a Cooperative 48 50 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Development Agreement(CDA). Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on Locust Grove and 5/6 lanes on Amity 2021- 49 51 Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2025 2022 2025 Project programmed to be constructed in 2025. Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. 50 52 Victory Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Reevaluate as conditions change. Victory Rd and Linder Rd Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd/Chinden Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in Locust Grove Corridor A:Locust Grove Rd, 51 53 Blvd(US 20/26) accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden Blvd) 52 5 Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Ustick Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Project would require the removal of on-street parking for existing homes. To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into future IFYWP 53 55 Pine, Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use bikeway. updates. Pine Ave,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Please provide description of requested 54 Eagle Rd/Fairview Ave Not provided improvements. Eagle Rd and Fairview Ave To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 55 57 Lake Hazel/Discovery Park Intersection improvements requested at entrance to Discovery Park. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Lake Hazel Rd and Discovery Park Amity Corridor B:Amity Rd,Eagle Rd/ 56 58 Amity, Eagle to Cloverdale Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Cloverdale Rd. Request to add crossing Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk and pedestrian and bike facilities.Include at Ten Mile Creek Amity Corridor B:Amity Rd,Locust Grove Rd/ 57 Amit , Locust Grove to Eagle enhanced pedestiran crossing at Ten Mile Creek pathway crossing. 2026 Future Future crossing Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Eagle Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 58 d�Victory,Ten Mile to Linder Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Victory Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 59 61 Black Cat, Cherry to Ustick Widen black Cat to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Blact Cat Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 60 63 Black Cat, Ustick to McMillan Widen black Cat to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Black Cat Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Black Cat Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20/26 61 64 Black Cat, McMillan to Chinden Widen black Cat to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. (Chinden Blvd) To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 62 65 McMillan, Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen to 3 lanes inclusion into future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Rd Widen to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, and pedestrian and bike facilities. Install an To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 63 66 McMillan,Ten Mile to Linder enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at Palantine Way. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd 2022- 64 Ea le, Lake Hazel t0 Amity TBD 2021 2023 2024 Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. Eagle Rd,Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Page 3 of 8 2023 ansportation C - �J PrioritY 2021 LM 11mmkommission Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0 0 'ridian Staff OMMEN ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 65 68 Locust Grove, Lake Hazel to Amity Widen Locust Grove to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,and pedestrian and bike facilities. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Widen roundabout to a dual lane roundabout, with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike 2021- Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual remove 69 Lane) lanes.Project to be constructed concurrently with Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd. 2020 2020 1 2022 constructed in 2022 Project programmed to be constructed in 2022. Lane) Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike lanes in accordance 2019- 2021- Project programmed to be constructed in 2021- remove 70 Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd with the 2016 CIP. 2018 2020 2022 constructed in 2022 2022. Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Franklin is built to full Please provide description of requested remove 26 Eagle Rd/Franklin Rd Notprovided build out. improvements. Eagle Rd and Franklin Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance 2020- 2022- Project programmed to be constructed in 2022- remove 5 Ten Mile Rd,Victor Rd/Overland Rd with the 2016 CIP. 2019 2021 2023 constructed in 2022 2023. Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Pr 2019- remove 36 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd Construct a roundabout.Project includes bridge#205AX. 2018 2020 2021 constructed in 2022 Project programmed to be constructed in 2021. Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd already constructed to 5 lanes on 3 legs,4th to Widen and signalize intersection to 5 lanes on Linder Rd and 6 lanes on Overland Rd be done with overpass remove 23 Overland Rd and Linder Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2021 2021 2022 project Project programmed to be constructed in 2022. Overland Rd and Linder Rd Already constructed to 5 Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not a remove 33 Cher Ln, Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. lanes 2020 CIP project. Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen intersection or add roundabout in accordance with the Master Street Map. Traffic analysis should determine the ultimate lane configuration based on above 2019- 2020- 2022- Project programmed to be constructed in 2022- remove 35 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd projects in the area. 2020 2021 2023 constructed in 2022 2023. Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd ProgramsCommunity Reconstruct Stoddard Rd,between Victory Rd and Overland Rd to 3-lanes,7'attached sidewalks and bike lanes. Project includes bridge#2085 and an enhanced pedestrian Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon)at Victory and Stoddard(CM214-27). Bike lanes South Meridian Improvements A:Stoddard Rd, 1 2 (Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Kodiak Dr) may be replaced by a pathway per the Bike Master Plan Update. 2022 2023 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2022. Victory Rd/Overland Rd Construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter,sidewalk, and improved East 03rd St, Franklin Rd/Carlton Ave UPRR crossing, from Franklin Rd to Carlton Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Downtown Improvements A:East 2 (Phase 1) Meridian Neighborhood Plan. 2024 2025 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2024. 03rd St Franklin Rd/Carlton St Goddard Creek Way and City requests detached concrete sidewalk with curbing Request a crossing to be between Goddard Creek Way and Wild Goose Way. City requests a pedestrian part of the project(Girl North Meridian Improvements A:McMillan Rd, 3 7 McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd crossing across McMillan near Hunter Elementary. 2025 2026 Future Scouts) Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Cortana Way/Goddard Creek Way Meridian Downtown Improvements A:Main St 4 9 Main St and King Street Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Main St at King Street. 2024 N/A 2026 Project programmed to be constructed in 2026. and King St Pedestrian Crossing Amity Corridor B:Amity Rd,Eagle Rd/ 5 10 Amity, Eagle to Hillsdale Pedestrian improvements on Amity to the YMCA and City Park. 2026 Future Future Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Cloverdale Rd. Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding signage on Bower St, between Meridian Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible North Boise Improvements C:Bower St, 6 12 Bower St, Meridian Rd/E. 03rd St and E.03rd St. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Meridian Rd/03rd St Victory Corridor A:Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian 7 13 Victory Rd, Glacier Bay Way/Mesa Way Complete sidewalk on the south side adjacent to county parcel. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing (rectangular rapid flashing beacon) on Pine Meridian Downtown Improvements A:Pine 8 19 Pine Ave and W. 1 st St Pedestrian Crossing Ave at W 01 st St to improve access to Meridian Elementary School. 2024 2025 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2024. Ave and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd/Red Horse Complete sidewalk on the north side of McMillan Rd, between Locust Grove Rd and North Meridian Improvements A:McMillan Rd, 9 20 Way Red Horse Way. 2024 2025 2026 Project programmed to be constructed in 2026. Red Horse Way/Locust Grove Rd Complete sidewalk on the west side of Linder Rd,between Washington St and Maple Complete pedestrian facilities existing in this 10 21 Linder Rd,Washington St/ Maple St I St. section. Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple St Page 4 of 8 Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0 • COMMEN ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name In U City to evaluate CDBG for Pedestrian connection(sidewalk)between Barbara Drive in Fairview Terrace Park to E. this project. Do not ACHD to support City led effort. Coonection 11 54 Fairview Terrace to Chief Joseph Willowbrook Drive and Chief Joseph Elementary on Chateau Drive. request from ACHD. would be located on private property. Barbara Dr Pedestrian Connection Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Install an enhanced pedestrian signal and lighting on the north side of Palermo at South Meridian ImprovmentsA:Locust Grove 12 22 Signal Locust Grove. 2022 2023 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2022. Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Meridian Rd at/near Settlers Park entrance Meridian Corridor -Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/ 13 23 Meridian, north of Ustick and Sundance Subdivision micropath. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. McMillan Rd To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 14 31 Linder Road, Maple Avenue/Cherry Lane Install Level 3 bike facilities inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Linder Rd Bikeway,Maple Ave/Cherry Ln Seasons to River Valley Elementary; Good Ustick-Cherry Bikeway, Black Cat Road/ connection to Kleiner; NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Ustick-Cherry Bikeway,Black Cat Rd/Hickory 15 41 Chateau Drive Install Level 1 bike facilities east-west long route for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Way Locust Grove Road, Leighfield Drive to Star Connect gap from existing sidewalk on west side of Locust Grove Road, along with Locust Grove Corridor A:Locust Grove Rd, 16 33 Lane improving narrow sidewalk on east side of roadway. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln/Grand Install sidewalks on the east side of Locust Grove Rd to connect with an existing path to Locust Grove Corridor A:Locust Grove Rd, 17 36 Canyon Dr the school. 2025 2026 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd North to south,Settlers Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Cherry Lane/ Park,8th st park,Meridian North Meridian Improvements A:Linder- 18 32 Chinden Boulevard Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities 2024 2025 Future middle, Project programmed to be designed in 2024. Meridian Bikeway,Pine Ave/Temple Dr Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not a 19 New Cherry Ln, Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Install Level 3 bike facilities along Cherry Lane from Linder Road to Meridian Road 2020 CIP project. Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway, Linder Road/ NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway,IN08th St/Chinden 20 40 Chinden Boulevard Install signing and pavement marking to existing Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities North-South Long Route for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Blvd McMillan-Ustick Bikeway, Cool River Avenue Settlers Park; east west; NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized McMillan-Ustick Bikeway(Phase 3),Linder Rd/ 21 37 /Eagle Road Install Level 1 bike facilities about 3 blocks for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Eagle Rd) W Park CreekDr, Crosswalk at N Deer Cree 22 New Ln Install enhanced crossing with hawk signal or RRFB McDermott Road, Ustick Road to McMillan Install sidewalk on the west side of McDermott Road connecting to sidewalk on Ustick NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized McDermott Rd Pedestrian Facilities,Ustick Rd 23 6o Road Road and McMillan Road for connectivity to Owyhee High School for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. /McMillan Rd Settlers Park Need; Parks NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized 24 42 Ustick Road and Venable Lane Install an enhanced crossing(pedestrian hybrid beacon) requests this for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Ustick Rd and Venable Ln Pedestrian Crossing North to south,2 Central Meridian Bikeway, Blue Heron Street Install Level 1 bike facilities along the Central Meridian Bikeway from Blue Heron Street elementary schools,no 25 2millmom/Chinden Boulevard to Chinden Boulevard N/A N/A 2026 parks Project programmed to be constructed in 2026. Bikeway Signage(2026) Schould this be an enhanced crossing or 26 New N Naomi Ave, Usitck to Ponderosa Install 20mph school zone signs 20mph or both? not top 15, mostly complete, 1 block Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway, Pine Avenue/ residential, 1 block NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway,Pine Ave/ 27 34 McMillan Road Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities industrian,north-south for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Chinden Blvd Scoped"No Go"in 2018.Sidewalk on east side to 28 59 Nola Rd,south of Pine Ave Middle School Construct sidewalk on the east side of Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads. be built through development. Nola Rd,Pine Ave/Crossroads Middle School Most of the stretch already is built or has an alternative pathway; Chinden-McMillan Bikeway,Ten Mile Road/ Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities along the Chinden-McMillan Bikeway from Ten Locust grove to City 29 28 Sedona Drive Mile Road to Sedona Drive N/A N/A 2026 Limits still needed Project programmed to be constructed in 2026. Bikeway Signage(2026) Page 5 of 8 Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0) 0 riclian Staff Granger Ave Bikeway,Records Ave/ Granger Avenue Bikeway, Records Avenue/ short gap city limits to Shamrock Ave(BikewaySignage Program- 30 30 Cloverdale Road Install Level 1 bike facilities N/A N/A 2024 village Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. 2024) HO an a e-Targee Bikeway, Locust Grove Install signage and pavement markings along Hollandale-TargeeBikeway from Locust half done the rest in Concept was approved by ACHD Commission on 31 New Road/Eagle Road Grove Road to Eagle Road.IFYWP 2021-2025. design 12/07/22.Design in 2024. move up request after McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at Palantine sidewalks are completed North Meridian Improvements A:McMillan Rd 32 Crossing Way. 2024 2025 Future on McMillan Project programmed to be designed in 2024. and Palantine Way Pedestrian Crossing Complete sidewalks on the south side of Broadway Ave, between West 07th St and residential benefit but not Meridian Downtown Improvements A: 33 6 Broadway Ave,West 07th St/West 04th St West 04th St. 2026 Future Future high connectivity benefit Project programmed to be designed in 2026. Broadway Ave,West Oath St/West 04th St Meridian Downtown Improvements A:02nd 34 8 East 2 1/2 St, Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Install sidewalk on the west and/or east side. 2024 2025 Future alternative route on main Project programmed to be designed in 2024. 1/2 St Carlton Ave /Fairview Ave Ustick Corridor A-Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/ 35 25 Bridgetower Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Ustick Road at Bridgetower(Towerbridge?)Drive. 2022 2023 2024 Project programmed to be constructed in 2024. Linder Rd move down;need change based on Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan development;not on To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Hillsdale Elementary Pedestrian Crossings and 36 1 Stockenham Enhanced Cross-walks and near Rockhampton/Hill Park St.Update school zone signs and flashers. requests inclusion into future IFYWP updates. School Zone will come with construction; alternate To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 37 15 Taormina Drive at Maesaia Way Install sidewalk on south side of Taormina Drive near Maesaia Way. route available inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Taormina Dr at Maesaia Way Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, move down; this will sidewalk, and improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in come with development; Defer until completion of Phase 1 (Franklin to East03rd St Extension,Carlton St/Fairview 38 E. 3rd, Carlton to Fairview accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. not request Carlton). Ave Meridian Downtown Improvements A:Locust Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Woodbridge Dr or Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian 39 451 Pedestrian Crossing Watertower St. 2024 2025 Future Project programmed to be designed in 2024. Crossing 40 46 Eagle Rd, River Valley St/Ustick Rd Complete sidewalks on Eagle Rd,between River Valley Stand Ustick Rd. ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD. Eagle Rd,River Valley St/Ustick Rd 41 49 Chinden Blvd, east of Ten Mile Rd Complete sidewalks on Chinden Blvd,east of Ten Mile Rd. ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD. Chinden Blvd,E/O Ten Mile Rd ACHD to evaluate as part of future budgeting 42 50 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Study the connectivity and bikeability of the Woodbridge neighborhood. efforts. Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study ACHD Traffic Engineering does not recommend installation. Crossing activity is caused by parent Watertower St and Rebound School 43 51 Watertower St at Rebound School Install a painted crosswalk on Watertower St at Rebound School. drop off. Pedestrian Crossing Linder Rd, Chateau Dr/Barbara Morgan ACHD Traffic believes current signage is 44 52 STEM Way finding signage on Linder. adequate. No additional signage recommended. Linder Rd,Chateau Dr/Barber Morgan STEM To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Meridian Rd and Producer Dr Pedestrian 45 53 St. Ignatius School Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Meridian Road at Producer. inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Crossing Complete sidewalk on both sides of West 02nd, between the Union Pacific Railroad Sidewalk scoped"No Go"in 2015. Agencies to 46 55 West 02nd St, UPRR/Broadway Ave and Broadway Ave to address parking concerns in this area. coordinate if other solutions identified. West 02nd,UPRR/Broadway Ave Scoped"No Go"in 2018 as issues are caused by Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School drop-off activities.Encourage school to work with Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School 47 58 Pedestrian Crossing Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at Crossroads Middle School. parents. Pedestrian Crossing painted crsosswalk was added,enhanced will be Install an enhanced crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) on Locust Grove Road at requested with road Locust Grove Corridor -Locust Grove Rd, 48 35 Locust Grove Road and Heritage Park Street Heritage Park Street,access for Meridian Technical Charter High School 2025 2026 Future widening Project programmed to be designed in 2025. Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Page 6 of 8 C ransportafiJ Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0) 0 hon COMMEN ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name Heroes Park connection; mostly constructed,the Gondola-Malta Bikeway, Black Cat Road/ rest will come with NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Gondola-Malta Bikeway,W/O Black Cat Rd/ 49 29 Goddard Creek Way Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities development for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Goddard Creek Way 50%constructed already; Install Level 1 bike facilities along the Records Way Bikeway from Pine Avenue to remaining 50% is on Records Way Bikeway, Pine Avenue/ Florence Drive, Level 2 bike facilities from to Ustick Road to Baldcypress Street, and neighborhood roads NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Records Way Bikeway,Pine Ave/Chinden 50 Fernside Drive Level 1 bike facilities from Baldcypress Street to Wainwright Drive already low stress for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. (Bikeway Signage Program-2024) Unscoped.Montague Way,north of Amity Rd is a collector and roadway improvements are completed through redevelopment. When the Montague Way,Amity Road/Santo Stefano will come with property on the east side redevelops,they will be 51 New Drive Install sidewalk on east side of Montague Way from Amity Road to Santo Stefano Drive construction required to construct sidewalk. Construct a detached asphalt or concrete pathway on east side of Locust Grove 2020- 52 18 Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd/Puffin St between Puffin Stand Overland Rd. 2019 2021 2023 being constructed 2023 Project programmed to be constructed in 2023. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr 2020- Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd- 53 24 Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Time Zone Dr. 2019 2021 2023 being constructed 2023 Project programmed to be constructed in 2023. Time Zone Dr Pedestrian Crossing sidewalks in place already;Short;in a Black Cat-Ten Mile Bikeway, Cherry Lane/ neighborhood route to a NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Black Cat-Ten Mile Bikeway(Phase 1),Cherry 54 26 Ustick Road Install Level 1 bike facilities along the Black Cat-Ten Mike Bikeway Ischool for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Ln/Ustick Rd Stop sign needs to be taken down and replaced with a train signal. This area has 55 New Black Cat Rd and Topeka Ln become a high traffic area and the stop sign is not practical. Duplicative;Will also be a part of North B47 Records Way Bikeway, Records Avenue, Florence Drive/Fairview Pine Avenue/Fernside NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Records Way Bikeway,Pine Ave/Chinden remove 38 Avenue Install Level 2 bike facilities with construction of improved roadway Drive for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. (Bikeway Signage Program-2024) Too general to be productive; specific requests being made with ACHD to prioritize and scope arterial crossings remove 44 Meridian Rail-with-Trail Multi-use pathway along rail road tracks. projects when City moves pathway project forward. Meridian Rail-with-Trail Being constructed with Residential Capital To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Meridian Downtown Improvements B: remove 5 Washington St,W. 07th St/Main St Complete sidewalk on Washington St,between W.07th Stand Main St. Maintenance inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Washington St 07th St/Main St W 08th St and Meridian Middle Sc oo Enhanced School Crossings-MeridianMiddle remove 48 Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing on 8th St at Meridian Middle School. 2020 2020 2021 already constructed COMPLETE School and Capital High School Evaluation completed fall 2016 shows existing Washington Stand W 1 st St Pedestrian crossing meet needs of current users. ACHD to remove 47 Crossing Pedestrian crossing near Meridian Elementary School. already painted reevaluate as conditions change. Washington St and 01stSt Pedestrian Crossing Scoped"Go-Defer"in 2015. Sidewalk exists on Kentucky Ridge Way, Riodosa Dr/Victory the east side. ACHD to reevaluate if existing remove 56 Rd Sidewalk on the west side of Kentucky Ridge Way,between Victory and Riodosa. already constructed sidewalk does not meet needs in area. Kentucky Way,Riodosa Dr/Victory Rd being constructed in Scoped"No Go"in 2015. This section has FY21 Residential Capital connectivity already on the south side and the remove 57 State Ave, East 2nd St/Cathy Ln Sidewalk repair.Requested by land owner in this area. Maintenance original requestor no longer owns the property. State Ave,2nd St/Cathy Ln Install crosswalk of Capulet Way on the west side of Siena Elementary school micro this was constructed To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Capulet Way Pedestrian Crossing(S/O Falcon remove 14 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary path. summer 2022 inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Dr) moved to Roads & NEW REQUEST.To be evaluated and prioritized Amity Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove remove 11 Amity, Meridian to Locust Grove pedestrian improvements Intersections list for possible inclusion into future IFYWP updates. lRd Page 7 of 8 0kommission Ranking Rank Agency Project Name Agency Project Description 0) 0 ridian Staff OMMEN ACHD Update ACHD Implementation Project Name remove request; crossing To be evaluated and prioritized for possible Taconic Dr and Pioneer Trail Ave Pedestrian remove 16 Taconic Dr/Pioneer Install crosswalk at intersection of Taconic and Pioneer(Hillsdale Subdivision). was added at montague inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Crossing Complete the pedestrian improvements along the full mile. Some segments are already planned for improvement, but when they are complete there will still be gaps in design with the road Project to be built through a Cooperative remove 17 Lake Hazel Rd, Locust Grove to Eagle to the north and south. widening project Development Agreement(CDA). Lake Hazel Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Page 8 of 8 2018-2022 Locations of Ped/Bike VS Vehicle Accidents Location Identifier Location Count IFYWP Request Status Walmart 4051 E FAIRVIEW AVE 4 #50 CP Records Way Bikeway,Pine Avenue/Fernside Drive RECORDS/USTICK 3 #50 CP Records Way Bikeway,Pine Avenue/Fernside Drive Meridian High School 1900 W PINE AVE 3 #10 CP Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple St Sidewalks;#53 R&I Widen Pine,Linder to Meridian CHERRY/TEN MILE 3 #10 R&I Improve Ten Mile Rd/Cherry Ln FAIRVIEW/LOCUST GROVE 3 #4 R&I Widen Fairview Ave/Locust Grove Rd MERIDIAN/PINE 3 No IFYWP request PINE/EAGLE 3 No IFYWP request MERIDIAN/CHERRY 3 No IFYWP request FAIRVIEW/MERIDIAN 2 No IFYWP request Albertsons 3499 E FAIRVIEW AVE 2 #50 CP Records Way Bikeway,Pine Avenue/Fernside Drive FAIRVIEW/RECORDS 2 #50 CP Records Way Bikeway,Pine Avenue/Fernside Drive CHERRY/8TH 2 #18 CP Linder-Meridian Bikeway,Cherry Lane/Chinden Boulevard;#19 CP Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Bike facilities EAGLE/FAIRVIEW 2 #54 R&I Eagle Rd/Fairview Ave LOCUST GROVE/VICTORY 2 #14 R&I Victory Rd/Locust Grove Rd ASHTON/MERIDIAN 2 #21 CP McMillan-Ustick Bikeway,Cool River Avenue/Eagle Road;#16 R&I Widen Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd LINDER/MONUMENT 2 #21 CP McMillan-Ustick Bikeway,Cool River Avenue/Eagle Road;#16 R&I Widen Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd LINDER/STONE VALLEY 2 No IFYWP request(#21 would prove a safer alternative crossing) Gramercy Park BLUE HORIZON/WELLS 2 No IFYWP request Stinker 1410 W MCMILLAN RD 2 No IFYWP request Big Lots 20 E FAIRVIEW AVE 2 No IFYWP request Khols 3275 N EAGLE RD 2 No IFYWP request Walmart 795 W OVERLAND RD 2 No IFYWP request FRANKLIN/LINDER 2 No IFYWP request FRANKLIN/MERIDIAN 2 No IFYWP request LINDER/PINE 2 No IFYWP request LOCUST GROVE/USTICK 2 No IFYWP request LOCUST GROVE/OVERLAND 2 No IFYWP request MCMILLAN/MERIDIAN 2 No IFYWP request MERIDIAN/ EB 84 OFF 2 No IFYWP request *Only locations with 2 or more accdients listed. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Human Resources: Update to City Standard Operating Policy and Procedure 4.1 Holidays �WEI� r.r. City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy Number 4.1 Holidays Purpose: To set forth the policy regarding holidays observed by the City and related leave and compensation pertaining to holidays. Policy: The City shall provide paid holidays to all eligible employees who are in a paid status the day before and the day after the holiday. Represented Fire employees holiday benefits and related leave and compensation are covered under the collective labor agreement. Holiday pay will be equivalent to the employee's regular work schedule. Holiday pay will not be given to employees taking any unpaid leave time the day before or the day after a holiday. Holidays must be observed on the City's designated holiday. Individual exceptions must be approved by the department director. Eligible employees shall be granted up to eleven paid holidays per year. Emergency service personnel or others required to work on holidays shall be compensated for holiday hours as outlined in the Holidays Standard Operating Procedures. This policy shall be implemented pursuant to the Holidays Standard Operating Procedures. Authority& Responsibility: Payroll shall work in conjunction with Human Resources to ensure proper tracking and payment of holiday hours for employees, including special arrangements for emergency service personnel or others required to work on holidays. Revision Date:02/15/2022 �WEI� City of Meridian Standard Operating Procedures Number 4.1 CHANGES TO THESE PROCEDURES REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL Holidays Purpose: To set forth the City's procedures regarding the holidays observed by the City and related leave and compensation pertaining to holidays. Procedures and Related Information: I. Holidays A holiday is a day of exemption from work, granted to eligible employees as if they had actually worked.The City observes eleven (11) holidays with pay during the calendar year: 1. New Year's Day (January 1) 2. Martin Luther King,Jr's Birthday/Human Rights Day (3rd Monday in January) 3. President's Day(3rd Monday in February) 4. Memorial Day (Last Monday in May) 5. Juneteenth (June 19) 6. Independence Day(July 4) 7. Labor Day(V Monday in September) 8. Veteran's Day(November 11) 9. Thanksgiving (41h Thursday in November) 10. Day after Thanksgiving 11. Christmas Day (December 25) II. Holidays must be observed on the City's designated holiday; no individual exceptions will be made based on work schedule or other leave considerations without department director approval III. Holidays Occurring on Saturday or Sunday Generally, holidays falling on a Saturday are observed on the preceding Friday;those falling on Sunday are observed the following Monday. In celebrating the above holidays, all City offices and departments will be closed with the exception of those departments responsible for wastewater and emergency service. IV. Holiday Compensation for Shift or Compressed Workers A. For employees working shifts of nine (9),ten (10), or more hours per day, a maximum of (eleven) 11 holidays per calendar year will be given at the employees scheduled work hours. Shift or compressed workweek employees are paid holiday pay at his/her assigned work schedule. Revision Date:02/15/2022 B. Employees may not alter their assigned work schedule during a holiday week without department director approval. V. Compensation for Holidays A. Non-Shift regular full-time employees are paid for eight (8) hours of holiday pay for each holiday up to a maximum of eleven (11). C. Part-Time, temporary and seasonal employees are only paid for hours worked. D. An employee who is assigned to work on a recognized holiday will be paid for hours worked on the holiday at the regular rate of pay holiday pay at straight time for his/her assigned work schedule. For example, if a non-shift employee is regularly scheduled to work on Wednesday, December 25, and is assigned to work three hours on that day, he/she would be paid for a total of eight (8) hours of holiday pay plus three (3) hours of straight time pay,for a total of eleven (11) hours of pay. If a shift employee is regularly scheduled to work on Wednesday, December 25,for their normal ten (10) hour shift, he/she would be paid for ten (10) hours of holiday plus ten (10) hours of straight time pay,for a total of twenty(20) hours of pay. VI. Holiday and Leave Status A. Employees who are on leave status (vacation, sick, personal,worker's compensation, military duty, FMLA, etc.) are not eligible for additional holiday pay. For example, if an employee is on vacation leave during the week of December 23 through December 27, that employee's pay would reflect four(4) days of vacation leave and one (1) day of holiday pay. Holidays falling within approved leave time will not be counted as part of the leave time. B. Holiday pay will not be given to employees taking any unpaid leave time the day before or the day after a holiday. C. Employees terminating their employment may not use accrued leave to extend their separation date for the purpose of receiving holiday pay or other benefits. VII. Represented Fire Employees Holiday leave for represented Fire employees shall be governed by the provisions of the collective labor agreement. Revision Date:02/15/2022