HomeMy WebLinkAboutDakota Ridge Sub1� I
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING:- August 19,1997
APPLICANT: MAX BOESIGER ITEM NUMBER: 6
REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DAKOTA
RIDGE SUBDIVISION
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
COMMENTS
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
STREET FRONTAGE WIDTH
APPLICATION OF MAX A. BOESIGER, INC.
FOR A VARIANCE OF THE 80' STREET FRONTAGE ON THREE LOTS AND
A VARIANCE OF THE 11000' BLOCK LENGTH
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The above entitled variance request having come on for hearing
on August 5, 1997, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date,
at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho,
Becky Bowcutt of Briggs Engineering appearing for the Applicant,
and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written
testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was
published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing
for August 5, 1997, the first publication of which was fifteen (15 )
days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at
the August 5, 1997, hearing; that copies of all notices were
available to newspaper, radio and television stations.
2. That notice of public hearing is required to be sent to
property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the
land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E., 11-2-419 D., and 11-
9-612 B. 1.b of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian; that his requirement has been met.
3. That the property is zoned R-4 Residential; that the
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1
JWCEIVED
AUG 15 1997
CITY OF AEROAN
Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-410 A. requires that the street frontage in
the R-4 zone for single -family subdivisions be 80 feet.
4. That the Applicant has requested that he be granted a
variance from the minimum street frontage requirement for R-4 zoned
lots for Lot 19, Block 3, and Lots 4 and 5, Block 4 of the
subdivision.
5. The Applicant proposes to have a 50' street frontage on
Lot 9 of Block 3, and proposes a shared drive-way concept for Lots
4 and 5 of Block 6 because of sewer easements.
6. The Applicant also proposes to obtain a variance from the
maximum block length of 1,000 feet for Block 4, and argues that it
is justified because the configuration of the school site creates
a long block. The Applicant states that it has provided a micro-
path (Lot 10, Block 4 ) as a pedestrian connection for Block 4. The
pathway would connect the elementary school with the subdivision.
He further states that by providing the micro-path a pedestrian
connection has been provided,_ which serves the same purpose for
pedestrians as having a block of not more than 1,000 feet.
7. Becky Bowcutt, representing the Applicant, testified that
the Applicant desires an exception to the 80 feet of lot frontage
required in the R-4 zone and requests an easement to two of the
lots. She indicated that there would be gates or ballads for the
easement rather than 80 feet of street frontage. She also
indicated that one of the block lengths in the subdivision was
greater than 1,000 feet, but stated with the access of the school,
by means of pedestrian accesses, the block is broken up.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2
8. That the Applicant is the owner of record of the
property.
9. Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer,
commented that due to the fact that the City Council has already
approved the Preliminary Plat for the subdivision, the variance
issue is really a mood point. He additionally states that the
variance appears to be justified due to the sewer alignment and
proposed school site plan shown.
10. The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District commented that
a land use change/site development application is required for
review prior to final platting, and stated that all laterals and
waste way must be protected, all municipal surface drainage must be
retained onsite, if any surface drainage leaves the site the Nampa
& Meridian Irrigation District must review the drainage plans, the
Applicant must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805, and that it is
recommended that irrigation water be made available to all
developments within the Nampa& Meridian Irrigation District.
11. The Central District Health Department submitted a
response and it did not indicate any objection to the variance.
12. The Meridian Fire Department and the Meridian Police
Department submitted comments and they did not object to the
variances.
13. That no people appeared at the hearing objecting to the
variance application.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice of the proposed
subdivision to owners of property.within 300 feet of the external
boundaries of.the Applicant's property.
2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant
to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section
11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances.
3. That the City Council has judged this application by the
guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the
Subdivision and Development Ordinance and upon the record submitted
to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice.
4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own
proceedings, those of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual
conditions existing within the.City and the State.
5. That the following provision of Section 11-2-419 A, of
the Zoning Ordinance, is noted which is pertinent to the
Application:
11-2-419 A.
The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance
from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision
and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the
public interest where, owing to special conditions, a
literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance
would result in unnecessary hardship. No non -conforming
use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the
same district and no permitted or non -conforming use of
lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4
be considered grounds for issuance of a variance.
Variances shall be granted only where strict application
of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in
unnecessary. hardship. A variance application does not go
to the Commission unless directed by the Council.
6. That the specific requirements regarding a variance
that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as
follows:
11-2-419 C. FINDINGS
A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a
public hearing) the Council makes a statement of
supportive reasons based directly on the evidence
presented to it which supports conclusions that the
mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have
been met by the applicant and unless all of the following
exist:
1. That there are such special circumstances or
conditions affecting the property that the strict
application of the provisions of this Ordinance
would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable;
2. That strict compliance with the requirements of
this Ordinance would result in. extraordinary
hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer
because of unusual topography, other physical
conditions or other conditions which are not self-
inflicted, or that these conditions will result in
inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of
this Ordinance;
3. That the granting of the specified variance will
not be detrimental to the public's welfare or
injurious to other property in the area in which
the property is situated;
4. That such variance will not have the effect of
altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance
and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
7. That there would be a specific benefit or profit,
economic gain or convenience to the Applicant, if the Application
is granted, in that the Applicant would not have to meet the
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5
ordinance requirements that other developers have to meet,
particularly in near and adjacent areas, including the required
maximum lot frontage of 80 feet and the maximum block length of
1,000 feet.
8. That regarding Section 1172-419 C it is specifically
concluded as follows:
a. That there are special circumstances or conditions
affecting the property such that the strict
application of the provisions of the street
frontage and maximum block length Ordinances would
clearly be unreasonable, in that the lots have
restricted ability to meet the street frontage
requirement due to reasons beyond the Applicant's
control. The variance of the 1,000 foot maximum
block length is caused by the placement of the
school but Applicant has provided pedestrian access
that breaks up the length of the block for
pedestrian purposes. The requested deviations from
the Ordinance are not substantial.
b. That strict compliance with the requirements of the
maximum 1,000 foot block length requirement would
result in extraordinary hardship to the applicant,
because of the school which shall be constructed
adjacent to Applicant's property and because
Applicant placed pedestrian accesses into and out
of the school property, the granting of the
variance would be reasonable and prudent. The
granting of the variance on the 80 feet of street
frontage would also be reasonable because sewer
easements, not placed by the Applicant, cause the
lack of ability to meet the 80 foot requirement.
C. That the granting of the specified variances would
not be detrimental to the public's welfare or
injurious to other property in the area in which
the property is situated.
d. That such variance would not have the effect of
altering the interests and purposes of the 80 foot
street frontage requirement or the 1,000 foot block
length of the Zoning Ordinance.
9. That in regard to the first paragraph of 11-2-419 A,
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6
which is quoted above, it is specifically noted that it states, in
part, as follows:
The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from
the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and
Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public
interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal
enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result
in unnecessary hardship.
10. That it is specifically concluded that the Application
for the variances should be granted:
a. In the case of the required street
frontage, the street frontage on the lots for
which the variance is requested was not
established by the Applicant, but only
established because the lots are large and
they abut up against a sewer line easement.
b. Because the block length in excess of
1,000 feet will be, or has been, provided with
pedestrian accesses so that pedestrians may
pass through the longer than 1,000 foot block
to gain access to the school grounds.
11. The City has in the past granted similar variances as
requested by the Applicant but has also denied such variances; each
application must stand on its own merits and the granting of one
variance is not a precedent for granting others.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby approve
these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN MORROW
COUNCILMAN BENTLEY
VOTED
VOTED
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7
COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED
COUNCILMAN TOLSMA VOTED
MAYOR CORRIt (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION
That it is hereby decided that the variance from the R-4
street frontage of 80 feet and the required maximum block length of
1,000 square feet are hereby granted.
APPROVED:
city\variance\dakota.ff
DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 5199
APPLICANT: Max Boesicier ITEM NUMBER: 9
REQUEST: Request for a variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
"REVIEWED"
CITY FIRE DEPT:
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
OFFICIALS
V. LIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANYC_ L. SMITH, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt.
SHARI L. STILES. P & Z Administrator
PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor
KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. 'BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Mayor
COUNCIL MEMBERS
WALT W. MORROW, Pres ce--
RONALD R. TOLSNIA
CHARLES M. ROUNTREE
GLENN R. BENTLEY
P & Z COMMISSIO%;
JIM JOHNSON, Chairma
MALCOLM MACCCY
KEITH BORUP
RON MANNING
BYRON SMITH
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the
Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to
Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: July 29, 1997
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/10/97 HEARING DATE: 8/5 /97
REQUEST: Variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision
BY: Max Boesiger Inc.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: S. of Ustick and 1/2 mile West on Ten Mile
Road
JIM JOHNSON, PIZ
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z
MERIDIAN POST_OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
RON MANNING, P/Z
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
BYRON SMITH, P/Z
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
_RONALD TOLSMA, C/C
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
_CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
_WALT MORROW, C/C
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
_GLENN BENTLEY, C/C
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PR LIM & FINAL PLAT)
DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF RECLA I (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
_WATER
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
.CITY FILES
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
YOUR CONCISE REMAR :
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ENGINEER
CITY PLANNER
"(dl.�
.AUL s;s;
OFFICIALS
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT Waste Water Suot.
DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt,
SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator
PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor
KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. "BILL" GORDON. Police Chief
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CIT fu E 10"'I ,I
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433 * FAX (208) 887-4813
Public `.Yorks/Building Department (208) 887-2211
Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Mayor
COUNCIL '.1E'.1BEF
WALT W. MORRO;^/. PresRONALD R.TOLSMA
CHARLES M.ROUNTR.E=
GLENN R.BENTLEI
P & Z CC%!M1ISS1
JIM JOHNSON, Clair--=-
MALCOLM "AACCC'
KEITH BCRUP
RON MANNING
BYRON SMITH
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITE' OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the
Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to
Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Juiv 29, 1997
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/10/97 HEARING DATE: 8/5/97
REQUEST: Variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision
BY: Max Boesiger Inc.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: S. of Ustick and 1/2 mile West on Ten Mile
Road
JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
RON MANNING, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
BYRON SMITH, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
_RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO,(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
_WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
_GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES /
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY74p
CITY ENGINEER `
CITY PLANNER /d /�ii� /� i- h� 'e. �, ,
Ol�
CENTRAL CEN. RAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPAk. MENT
DISTRICT Environment) Heahh DivisionRetum ,
HEALTH ❑ Boise
cc00lqrw
DEPARTMENT I11L 1 7 1997 ❑ Eagle
##
,� ��liAt'ae®o ., ❑ Garden city
Rezone
Meridian
Conditional Use # ❑ Kuna
Preliminary / Final / Short Plat ❑ ACz
1. 704471J � f=��Z ��4,�v 7',,J �iC qE Sr/d /�S/vim
I. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
❑ S. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth c-*
❑ high seasonal ground water
❑ solid lava from original grade
❑ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers:
❑ 2 feet
❑ 4 feet
7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities, are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well
❑ interim sewage ❑ central water
❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water
❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water
❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water
❑ 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
❑ 11. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ❑ Waste Disposal ❑ Injection Well rules
❑ Groundwater Protection
This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage
Regulations.
We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas
❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store
❑ child care center
c
Date:
Reviewed By:
Review Sheel
CnHD 10/01 A W. IHS
16 July 1997
Wil/ Berg, City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Mer,diart, ID 83642
Dear Commis oners'
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Boise 343-1884
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Boise 345-2431
The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site
Development application be filed for review prior to fwal platting, Contact Donna Moore at
343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information,
All laterals and wasteways must be protected. All m unicipal surface drainage must be
retained on site, If anysurface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
District m ust renew drainage plans The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805.
It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District,
Sincerely,
Bill Henson, Asst, Water Superintendent
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
cc,' File - Shop
File - Office
Water Superintendent
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
18 July 1997
Stan McHutchison
Briggs Engineering, Inc.
1111 South Orchard, Suite 600
Boise, ID 83705
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa
466-7861
Boise
343-1884
SHOP: Nampa
466-0663
Boise
345-2431
RE: Land Use Change Application for Dakota Ridge Sub.
Dear Stan:
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to
file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above -
referenced development.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free
to call on me at the District's office or John Anderson, the
District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
Donna N. Moore,
Assistant Secretary/Treasurer
dnm
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Leonard & Nadine Aschenbrenner
Max A. Boesiger, Inc.
City of Meridian
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
Witt -IAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
?ANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt.
SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator
PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor
KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. 'BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Mayor
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer
Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator �5�
DATE: August 1, 1997
COUNCIL MEMBERS
WALT W. MORROW, President
RONALD R. TOLSMA
CHARLES M.ROUNTREE
GLENN R. BENTLEY
P & Z COMMISSION
JIM JOHNSON, Chairman
MALCOLM MACCOY
KEITH BORUP
RON MANNING
BYRON SMITH
SUBJECT: Request for Variance of 80' Frontage on Lots 19, Block 3, and Lots 4 & 5, Block
6; and Variance of Maximum Block Length of 1,000 feet for Block 4 of Dakota
Ridge Subdivision by Max A. Boesiger, Inc.
Due to the fact that Council has already approved the preliminary plat, the variance issue is really
a moot point. The variance appears to be justified due to the sewer alignment and proposed school
site plan shown.
MAY -23-1997 15:24
FROM
TO
CERTIFICATION OF HEARING NOTICE SIGN
8874813 P.03
I, Debbie Becker (Briggs Engineering, Inc.), do hereby certify that a hearing notice
sign for Dakota Ridge Preliminary Plat approval was placed at the subject parcel on
May 20, 1997.
Debbie Becker
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss.
County of Ada )
On this 20th day of —May-, 1997, before me, the undersigned, personally
appeared Debbie Becker , known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument, who, being by me first duly sworn, did depose
and say that she executed the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand ah! d affixed my official seal the
day and year in this certificate first above written,
','tttlii/OtIIt1�1
w �
41
970210\signno0ce
MnV '7-� r 017 1 G - 7G
• . f
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at
My Commission Expires
TOTAL P.03
JUL-31-1997 15:10 FROM TO 6674613 P.02
CERTIFICATION OF HEARING NOTICE SIGN
I, Donna Wilson ( Briggs Engineering, Inc.), do hereby, certify that a hearing notice
sign for Dakota Ridge variance application was placed at the subject parcel on July
24, 1997.
I r�zjmw �m 1 Am
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss,
County of Ada )
On this a7 day of , 1997, before me,fthe undersigned, personally
appeared �NIV4 W/1 -So
Al , known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument, who, being by me first duly sworn, did depose
and say that she executed the foregoing instrument,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
pp����movae�aso�
tary Public for dah®
esiding at
m0 PU�L�G My Commission Expires
aj0
, 0
�d �(' ���AA00�0��
9702101signnotice2
JUL 31 197 16:12 oncff nn