Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 04-17 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 17, 2001, at 6;30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance; ----2L- Tammy de Weerd ----2L- Ron Anderson X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird - ----2L- Mayor Robert Corrie- 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda; A. Minutes of February 20, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Approve B. Minutes of February 27, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Approve C. Minutes of March 6, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Approve D. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Special City Council Meeting: Approve E. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Approve F. Minutes of March 27, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Approve G. Tabled from February 20, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law; CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi-family residential and office and retail use by T ouchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig - east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84 (need to approve Development Agreement and annexation ordinance before approving CUP Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law): Move to Item 5-G Meridian City Council Agenda -April 17, 2001 Page I of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation fur disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. H. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ-00-021 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 70.72 acres to R-8 for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G.L Voigt Development - northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: Approve Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: PP- 00-020 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G. L. Voigt Development - northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: Approve J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ 00- 027 Request for annexation and zoning of 5.97 acres from RT to R-4 by Hubble Engineering for proposed Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: Approve K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: PP 00- 028 Request for Preliminary Plat approval 21 building lots and 3 other lots on 5.97 acres in a proposed R-4 zone by Hubble Engineering for proposed Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: Approve L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-001 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an office building for O'Neill Homes in an L-Q zone by Toothman-Orton Engineering Company I Johnson Design - Franklin Road and Locust Grove Road at 385 South Locust Grove Road: Approve M. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 78 acres from R-1 to C-C and C-G by Larson Architects for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: Approve N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-001 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 15 building lots and 1 other lot on 78 acres in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: Approve O. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial planned unit development and floodway approval in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Meridian City Council Agenda - April 17, 2001 Page 2 of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property ofthe City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: Approve P. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.764 acres from RT to R-40 and C-G for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Move to Item 5-P Q. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 building lots and 2 other lots on 11.764 acres in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Move to Item 5-P R. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 180-unit apartment complex and a planned development in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Move to Item 5-R 4. Department Reports: A City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. WWTP Digester Drain Line Project Contract Award: Approve JC Contractors $16,500.00 2. Coors Distributing Company emergency permit to hook up to the City Sewer - 3225 Commercial Court: Approve 3. Woodbridge Subdivision Streetlight Agreement: Approve 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) G. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi-family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig - east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84 (need to approve Development Agreement and annexation ordinance before approving CUP Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law): Meridian City Council Agcnda - April J 7, 200] Pagc 3 of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation fur disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. P. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.764 acres from RT to R-40 and C-G for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Tabled until 5-1-01 Q. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 building lots and 2 other lots on 11.764 acres in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Tabled until 5-1-01 R. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 180-unit apartment complex and a planned development in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Tabled until 5-1-01 6. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-003: Request for Final Plat approval of 31 building lots, 1 other lot, and 1 City lot on 8.04 acres in an R-4 zone for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc - south of Ustick Road, east of Linder Road: Approve 7. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-004: Request for Final Plat approval of 48 building lots and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres in an R-8 zone for Wilkins Ranch Village Subdivision by Steiner Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat and south of West Ustick: Approve 8. Tabled from April 3, 2001: FP 01-002 Final Plat approval of 82 + 2 existing single-family dwelling lots and 6 other lots on 43.33 acres for Observation Pointe Subdivision by Victory 41, LLC - north of Victory Road and east of Meridian Road: Approve 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 3, 2001: PP 01-004 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an R-8 zone by J-U-B Engineers for proposed Murdoch Subdivision No.2 - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval 10. Public Hearing: VAR 01-004 Request for Variance of the 1,000-foot block length for Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 by Howell-Murdoch Development Corporation - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Meridian City Council Agenda - April 17, 2001 Page 4 of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval 11. Public Hearing: AZ 00-019 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT -R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: Continue public hearing to 6-5-01 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-018 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in an R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: Continue public hearing to 6-5-01 13. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda - April 17,2001 Page 5 of5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilitics related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. RECEIVED APR 1 3 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 17, 2001, at 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: o Tammy de Weerd ~ Ron Anderson ~ Cherie McCandless ~ Keith Bird 7/(Xl.1'~ Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Minutes of February 20,2001, Regular City Council Meeting: Pf'lroV'~ B. Minutes of February 27,2001, Regular City Council Meeting: &-ffhJv<-e- C. Minutes of March 6, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: ~f/\e.- D. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Special City Council Meeting: a-p fH'O v...e.. E. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: tY/fprov<e..-- F. Minutes of March 27, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: ~?pY'tJVVl...-- G. Tabled from February 20, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi-family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig- east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84 (need to approve Development Agreement and annexation ordinance before approving CUP Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law): f? {;-€; ~.b-te h7 ~---(--o( H. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ- 00-021 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 70.72 acres to R-8 for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G.L Voigt Development- northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: IZPflY'Ov..e- Meridian City Council Agenda - April 17, 200 J Page lof4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contaet the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: PP- 00-020 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G.L. Voigt Development - northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: Ctf7Pr&v.e.- J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ 00- 027 Request for annexation and zoning of 5.97 acres from RT to R-4 by Hubble Engineering for proposed Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: CttfJptJVfL K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: PP 00- 028 Request for Preliminary Plat approval 21 building lots and 3 other lots on 5.97 acres in a proposed R-4 zone by Hubble Engineering for proposed Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: Cl(?Pl-r?V-R/ L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-001 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an office building for O'Neill Homes in an L-O zone by Toothman-Orton Engineering Company I Johnson Design - Franklin Road and Locust Grove Road at 385 South Locust Grove Road: LZPP rova-- M. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 78 acres from R-1 to C-C and C-G by Larson Architects for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: tV~ V'...e..-. N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-001 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 15 building lots and 1 other lot on 78 acres in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: aprpYl9V'.J2.-..- O. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial planned unit development and f100dway approval in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: ~ a?pro~ P. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law for Approval: AZ 01-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.764 acres from RT to R-40 and C:G for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Mcridian City Council Agenda - April 17, 200] Page 2 of4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities rclated to documents and/or hearings, please rontact the City Clerk's Office at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: ./0 S - t .fzt.ft&-- tvn-I-a ,5'-1-0 I Q. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 building lots and 2 other lots on 11.764 acres in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: -fo t)-({ ~Ue ~4' S--!-tJ( R. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 180-unit apartment complex and a planned development in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: -fo s- - /2.. ./wM tf/)'vh2 5'-(-& ( 4. Department Reports: A City Engineer - Gary Smith: 5. 6. WWTP Digester Drain Line Project Contract Award: a-ppY751V'~ ..n ~f-cPtr /1 /b,5"P(),o..!? Coors Distributing Company emergency permit to hook up to the City Sewer - 3225 Commercial Court: ct'ffrtll/-e. .3~ W(/t.7(Lj{)n~fJ.e...f'u bcfi'nll'l7n- J"keeJ-1ifi1vf Jt-rf>>~ v.pprl:J v-e--- (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) 1. 2. 7. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-003: Request for Final Plat approval of 31 building lots, 1 other lot, and 1 City lot on 8.04 acres in an R-4 zone for Tumble Creek Subdivision No.6 by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc - south of Ustick Road, east of Linder Road: a-pprt?v.fL.. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-004: Request for Final Plat approval of 48 building lots and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres in an R-8 zone for Wilkins Ranch Village Subdivision by Steiner Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat and south of West Ustick: ap;:rrovJt-- Tabled from April 3, 2001: FP 01-002 Final Plat approval of 82 + 2 existing single-family dwelling lots and 6 other lots on 43.33 acres for Observation Pointe Subdivision by Victory 41, LLC - north of Victory Road and east of Meridian Road: Ci-j?I1Tf9V..iL- Continued Public Hearing from April 3, 2001: PP 01-004 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an R-8 zone by J-U-B Engineers for proposed Murdoch Subdivision NO.2 - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: Meridian City Council Agenda-April 17,2001 tff/ll;rVJ-'lljJ. Iv ;;n-?(l.~ Page 3 of 4 ..f I.,t:.-.( C ( ..e..- Anyone desiring acco~~~:~;i~~l~::~:~~t~~p~~~~~~~e~i~:~~~~ ~~re::rfn:: ;fe~~ ~~~~~:~::;Clerk'S Officht 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 8. 9. 10. Public Hearing: VAR 01-004 Request for Variance of the 1,000-foot block length for Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 by Howell-Murdoch Development Corporation - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: a-f~f-Io ~fltvt-C.. -/'/:;:.( ci~ 11. Public Hearing: AZ 00-019 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT -R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: Cc;rn.-h h1A-.L ;J I A -/-0 6 - S- - 0 ( 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-018 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in an R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: .(' (' &-71.-.f7 h hL p / IL 1.0 e? -!? -0 ( 13. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: 4/9f/Y'O v.e..- Meridian City Council Agenda - April 17 , 200] Page 4 of4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Officc at 888- 4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. March 30,2001 Minutes MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT June 5, 2001 ITEM NO. C REQUEST Approve minutes of April 17, 2001, City Council Meeting AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~ r<V V^'" Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meeUngs shall become property of the City of Meridian. Meridian City Council Meetina April 17 . 2001 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday April 17, 2001 by President Keith Bird. Members present: Keith Bird, Ron Anderson, Cherie McCandless. Members absent: Tammy De Weerd, Mayor Robert Corrie. Others present: Gary Smith, Bill Nichols, Shari Stiles, Brad Watson, Ken Bowers, Dave Bowman. Bird: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We'll get the council meeting started for April 17,2001. I'd like to welcome you here. Mr. Clerk read the roll call please. Item 1. Item 2. o X Ron Anderson Keith Bird (inaudible discussion) Bird: I'll go ahead (inaudible) We do have an addition under departments report by Gary Smith. He'll have an item NO.3 which is the Woodbridge subdivision street light agreement. Item G on the consent agenda they would like to have that pulled to 5g on the regular agenda so we can talk about some phasing plans. If that's ok council. PQ and R has been asked - we need to move them to 5P, 5Q, and 5R because we've had a request from the developer to table them until the next meeting which I believe would be May 3rd . May 1, I'm sorry. Ok Council any other items or changes or nothing? Anderson: Don't see any. Bird: Ok. Anderson: I would make a motion then that we approve the agenda. McCandless: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 2 Bird: It's been moved and second to approve the agenda with the changes. All in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES Item 3. Consent Agenda: A. Minutes of February 20,2001, Regular City Council Meeting: B. Minutes of February 27, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: C. Minutes of March 6, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: D. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Special City Council Meeting: E. Minutes of March 20, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: F. Minutes of March 27, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting: G. Tabled from February 20, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi- family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig - east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84 (need to approve Development Agreement and annexation ordinance before approving CUP Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law): H. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ-00-021 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 70.72 acres to R-8 for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G.L Voigt Development - northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law for Denial: PP-00-020 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision by G.L. Voigt Development - northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads: J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: AZ 00-027 Request for annexation and zoning of 5.97 acres from RT to R-4 by Hubble Engineering for proposed Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 3 Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Denial: PP 00-028 Request for Preliminary Plat approval 21 building lots and 3 other lots on 5,97 acres in a proposed R-4 zone by Hubble Engineering for proposed Inglenook Subdivision - east side of Locust Grove and north of Victory Road: L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-001 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an office building for O'Neill Homes in an L-O zone by Toothman-Orton Engineering Company I Johnson Design - Franklin Road and Locust Grove Road at 385 South Locust Grove Road: M. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 78 acres from R-1 to C-C and C-G by Larson Architects for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-001 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 15 building lots and 1 other lot on 78 acres in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road: O. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law for Approval: CUP 01-002 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial planned unit development and f100dway approval in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center by Larson Architects - southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road P. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.764 acres from RT to R-40 and C-G for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Q. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 building lots and 2 other lots on 11.764 acres in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 4 & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: R. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law for Approval: CUP 01-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 180-unit apartment complex and a planned development in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Bird: Opposed? Ok. Now I would entertain a motion for the consent agenda with the changes as noted. Anderson: Mr. President. Bird: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion we approve the modified consent agenda. Bird: Do I hear a second? McCandless: I'll second. Bird: Ok. It's been moved and second to approve the modified consent agenda. All In favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 4. Department Reports: A City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. WWTP Digester Drain Line Project Contract Award: Bird: Ok. It passes. Item No.4 department reports, city engineer Gary Smith. (inaudible discussion) Smith: Thank you Mr. President, council members. First item that we have is the wastewater treatment plant digester drain line project. Award of contract, I think you have in your packet a letter of explanation from Brad Watson concerning this project. This project was to construct an emergency over flow pipeline from the new digester back into the plant process piping. This was to eliminate some spillage. Since the project was estimated to be less than 25,000 dollars we Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 5 solicited some quotations from contractors. Four were received. The lowest quote was from J C Constructors at 16,500 dollars to do that work. Star Construction was 23,887; Erminger 25,560; and Stevenson Construction at 27,230. J C Constructors recently completed the headworks expansion at the plant and the septage receiving station, did a great job. So, our recommendation to you would be to award this contract for the wastewater treatment plant digester drain line to J C Constructors in the amount of 16,500 dollars to authorize the Mayor to sign, the City Clerk to attest. Bird: Any questions Council? Anderson: I have none. Bird: If not, I'd entertain a motion. McCandless: Mr. President. Bird: Mrs. McCandless. McCandless: I move that we approve the, or award the contract to JC Constructors in the amount of 16,500 dollars for the Clerk to sign and the Mayor to attest. Anderson: Or, the other way around. McCandless: The other way around. Anderson: I'll second. Bird: It's been moved and second to accept the wastewater treatment plant digester drain line to JC Constructors in the amount of 16,500 and authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 2. Coors Distributing Company emergency permit to hook up to the City Sewer - 3225 Commercial Court: Bird: It's all passed. Thank you. Ok. Smith: Thank you. The second item I have is a request from Coors Distributing Company at 3225 Commercial Court to connect to sewer and water. This property is presently outside the city limits and it's a larger connection than I felt probably authorized me to approve based on our ordinance requirements so I'm bringing it to you tonight. They are having septic tank trouble. I've talked to Mr. George Wise beck about it several times. He has sent this letter in which you Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 6 have in your packet requesting the connection. He's also agreeing to entering into agreement for annexation of the property. He would connect to sewer and water. Bird: Mr. Anderson? Anderson: I had one question Gary. When I read George Wisebeck's letter to you he indicated it's our intention to complete the annexation process but I didn't see any time frame in there. The word immediately or something like that I guess come to mind that they would start that application process I guess. Is he clear on that? Smith: I think I mentioned that to George when I talked to him that it would need to start with the application for the connection. We ca certainly clarify that with him. He's here this evening. Anderson: Ok. Smith: Yeah, you're right Councilman Anderson. We need to be sure that this starts and that it's followed through on. Bird: Would you like Mr. Wisebeck to- Anderson: If he's here. Bird: George do you want to come forward. Wisebeck: Mr. President. Thank you. Councilman is correct. I have the application for annexation. We have not completed it because I need to have some engineering studies done. We have that in our process. As you're aware we're a subsidiary of our parent company, Coors Company. Being that you deal with corporations I think you understand there's somewhat of a time delay but we definitely have it in process and plan to complete that ASAP. Anderson: Ok. Thank you. Bird: Would you state your name please before you leave? Wisebeck: George Wisebeck. I'm the manger of the Coors Distributorship. Bird: Thank you George. Any other questions? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Ok. Council, what would be your privilege on this one? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 7 Anderson: Mr. President. I would make a motion then that we go ahead and authorize the hookup to the city sewer and allow the public works director to go ahead and take care of that process for us. Bird: Do I hear a second? McCandless: Second. Bird: Ok. Motion has been made and second to accept the permit to hook up to Coors Distributing at 3225 Commercial Court. Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES 3. Woodbridge Subdivision Streetlight Agreement: Bird: Passed. Smith: Mr. President. Bird: Mr. Smith. Smith: On that item would that involve our city attorney preparing that, ~~ he's shaking his head in the affirmative - ok thank you. Bird: Yes sir. Ok. The third - Shaun Nichol: Mr. President. Bird: Just a second. Shaun Nichol: Can I ask for a clarification on the second item. (inaudible) Bird: Yeah. Go ahead. B. Nichols: Mr. President, members of Council. Mr. Nichol, are you asking about the Inglenook application? The request for reconsideration was received and you know the process is that one of the Council members that voted with the majority has to move to reconsider it. The way to do that is one of those people would have to move to place it on the reg ular agenda and then move to reconsider. It's my understanding that neither of the council members who voted with the majority were inclined to move it to the regular agenda to reconsider it. That's why it was left on the consent agenda. Shaun Nichol: (inaudible) Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 8 Bird: If you're going to talk come up here so we can get you on. Shaun Nichol: I apologize for being out of order President and Council. For the record, Shaun Nichol, Hubble Engineering 701 Allen street in Meridian suite 102. Because we have one of the Council members absent that did make the motion and could possibly make another motion to reconsider, could we request a tabling of our findings of fact to the next meeting and bring that reconsideration request back in front at that time? Nichols: Mr. Nichol, I believe it's too late. The consent agenda has been approved but again, it would have had to be one of the people that was present here that voted for the majority and they didn't move to reconsider it. I would say it's too late to table. Shaun Nichol: Ok. Nichols: With regard to Mr. Arnold and Sundance subdivision it's the same response. Those that voted with the majority to deny the application, neither wish to move it off the consent agenda and put it on the regular agenda to reconsider. Arnold: May I make a statement? Nichols: That's up to the president not up to me. Bird: I'll let you make a statement. Get up there. Arnold: Had I known - for the record, Steve Arnold Briggs Engineering. I'm here representing the client. I guess things moved a little bit faster. Had I known before that we had one absent Commissioner that voted to deny our application, we would have, before the motion was made. It was made pretty quick tonight, recommended that this item be pulled. I understand that procedurally I'm 10, 15 minutes late. I'm just asking that maybe we step back a little bit and defer this item for a week to two weeks, or two weeks to the next Council hearing when we have a full Council. Bird: Mr. Arnold, that problem is to pull it, they have to have a second. There was three that was voted with the majority - Arnold: I understand. Bird: -- neither one of the two that are here that voted with the majority wanted to so regardless of how the one that is absent would have been, they would have still needed a second. Evidently the feeling tonight from the majority voters on that denial was that they did not want to move it. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 9 Arnold: I understand procedurally and had I been a little bit more obstinate and stood up and recommended before it was voted on, maybe I'm 15 minutes too late and a dollar or two short but I'm just requesting that the Council defer the findings of fact. Bird: It's already down the road. Arnold: Thank you for hearing me. Bird: Thank you. Mr. Smith, I believe you've got another- Smith: Thank you Mr. President. The last item I have is the approval of a street light maintenance Agreement for Woodbridge subdivision. These streetlights are - lamps are not standard to what we normally enter into for agreement with Idaho Power. So in that regard we have had streetlight agreements with past subdivision where they've used specialty streetlights. This agreement is prepared along those same lines so that the Homeowners Association is responsible for the maintenance of those lights. The city will pay the power. Bird: Council, any questions of Mr. Smith? Anderson: Gary, I had one. Are they required to like maintain a couple of extra poles in case a car runs into one and damages it or something? I mean a few years down the road whoever manufactures that might be out of business or whatever. Does our agreement require anything like that? Smith: I don't recall seeing that in there Councilman Anderson. Bird: We didn't. Smith: It's kind of, it's an agreement where the Homeowners Association is responsible for those lights. I don't know whether they would take it upon themselves to maintain a pole or two extra in supply or not. Anderson: I know that's a problem with those specialty poles. I mean, they're a fad for a few years and then they're gone and you can't get them anymore. That ought to be something that we consider in future agreements I guess is maybe asking them to buy a couple of extras because inevitably a couple of them are going to get damaged - Smith: Right. Anderson: ~~ throughout the years. Smith: Right. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 10 Bird: Any other questions? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Ok. Council what's your pleasure? Anderson: Mr. President. Bird: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion then that we approve the streetlight agreement for Woodbridge subdivision. McCandless: Second. Bird: Ok. It's been moved and second to approve the streetlight agreement with Woodbridge subdivision for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Discussion? Hearing none, all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) Bird: Ok. Item Smith: Thank you. G. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi- family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig - east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84 (need to approve Development Agreement and annexation ordinance before approving CUP Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law): Bird: Thank you Mr. Smith. Ok. First on the regular agenda is item SG which was moved from the consent Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the Touchmark Living Centers conditional use permit. I think Mr. Smith, did you have something on the phasing or something we needed to discuss on this? Smith: Thank you Mr. President. Council members. I reviewed the phasing plan that was submitted to us along with a narrative description of the different phases. There are 5 different phases described. From my review from the standpoint of sewer and water and access I didn't have any particular problems Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 11 with how they were proposing to phase it. They did make the amendment as Councilman Anderson requested last council meeting to provide the connecting street and this development and Mount View subdivision as part of phase one. After reviewing this with Shari a little bit, both she and I had a question as to the terminology for the completeness of the different aspects of these phases. They set forth 4 different stages of completion of the improvements. One is labeled as an R, which is a requirement that is bonded prior to building permits, completed prior to occupancy. In reviewing the narrative on the phasing I could find only 2 places where that existed. They were both streets and they're in phase 5 and one street that would built in as part of phase 2. A majority of the items are listed as prerequisite items to be completed prior to receipt of building permits. There's also some low priority items which are defined as needing bonding to permit occupancy. Shari and I were having a difficulty with the low priority items in that those are the streets or the streets are one of the low priority items. So, by definition that would mean that those streets would only need to be bonded prior to occupancy, they wouldn't need to be completed. And Shari had some concerns about the landscaping in that same manner. That the low priority designation for landscaping along Franklin Road and along the interstate would mean that they only needed to be bonded would not need to be completed prior to occupancy. They are showing the connection of the sewer and the water to the existing facilities in the area are adjacent to this project and the looping of the sewer and water. The biggest loop is that first phase that connects to the water line in Franklin Road, connects to the water line at St. Luke's property, extends those both into the project, loops them around. So, I guess we're looking for a little direction from you as to what you think the stage of completion should be prior to occupancy. In asking that question with the understanding that a majority of the roadways in this development are private roads. Although street A that shows up on your phasing plan is a public road into that round about number 2 and street B which would connect Montvue is also a public road. The life safety issues with construction are in agreement with what our policy has been with developments in that the sewer and the water are constructed, the fire hydrants will need to be active for the water for fire protection and the road base will have to be in place that will support an emergency vehicle fire truck. So, that's in accordance with our present policy but I think the finishing off of the surface of the streets, the landscaping (inaudible) and some fencing along the Ridinbough Canal. I guess those are the questions that we have that. I don't think there's a problem as far as the phasing goes. The plan that they've submitted it's just the completeness of the phasing before permitting, building permits and or occupancies are issued. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I'd like to ask Mr. Bradbury, Steve from Touch Mark to come up and address the - we also had a letter from some Montvue residents on some concerns. I believe you've seen the letter haven't you Steve? Bradbury: I have. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 12 Bird: Ok if you will state your name and - Bradbury: Sure. My name is Steve Bradbury. I am at 225 north 9th Boise, representing the applicant, Touch Mark. You want me to - Where do you want me to start? Bird: Do you want to answer the phasing for -- Bradbury: Sure. Bird: ~~ the Council and then we'll address the letter from- Bradbury: I guess the Touch Marks position - Let me start out that what was submitted is Touch Mark's proposal. Here's what we think we ought to try to do. If the Council thinks and I think Gary hasn't necessarily expressed an open opinion but certainly by drawing it to your attention we can at least imply that maybe he thinks it ought to be handled differently which is fine. If the Council believes that there ought to be certain of these element s constructed at certain times or completed at certain times, and bonding at other times that's fine. I think Touch Mark is going to try to get along with whatever the Council is interested in seeing done. What Touch Mark is interested in avoiding is being required to bond for or construct improvements in you know immediately that are in future phase areas. Let me try to say it differently. What Touch Mark wants to avoid doing is constructing improvements during phase one which should more appropriately be constructed and or bonded in future phases. That's the primary issue that I think Touch Mark wants to avoid. In other words, what we'd like to ask is that the City not require Touch Mark to build something now that would be in the phase 5 or phase 4 or phase 3 areas or phase 2 areas. But, if the Council is inclined to suggest that for example landscaping, required landscaping buffers and streets be bonded prior to building permits and completed prior to occupancy. I don't think you're going to get a big argument form Touch Mark on that. If that's where you'd like to see it go. Fencing I guess I put into the same category. If the City would like to see fencing bonded prior to permits and completed prior to occupancy, I think that's fine too. As I said our primary concern is to try to identify on a phase by phase bases which things need to be built in that phase and then if it's timing on bonding and completion that's fine. I don't think that we have real problems with that. Did you want me to - Bird: I'd like you to address, I personally would like you to address the letter that we received from - Bradbury: Sure. From Mr. McCreedy? Bird: Yes. Have you seen it? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 13 Bradbury: Yes I have. I saw that earlier today. I guess I have 2 thoughts about the letter. Number one I think that much of what they're asking about are issues that I think were more appropriately dealt with during the conditional use process. We've had our Public Hearings. We've addressed the issues with respect to at least conceptually the entire project and specifically this phase phase one. It seems to me that to go back and revisit those issues is re plowing the same ground again. Second, I think it's important for us to remember that we're talking about, we're only talking about a specific site plan and specific approval for one of 5 different phases. The area immediately adjacent to the Montvue subdivision is in phase 2 if I'm remembering that correctly. I don't have my drawing here in front of me. Touch Mark is going to be required to come back to the Council and obtain a conditional use permit, a specific conditional use permit for anything that happens is phase 2. So, it seems to me the residents of Montvue subdivision are going to have an opportunity to address the issues specific to their boundary with this project during the phase 2 conditional use permit process. So, if there are specific buffering issues that need to be addressed at that point in time. That's when I think it ought to be done. I think in other words I think we may be a little bit premature addressing those issues now. Did I get to the answer? Bird: You did for me. Bradbury: Ok. Bird: Thank you. Corrie: I think what I read from the letter from Mr. McCreedy is that they were worried about some of the dust because that construction road that you are going to build runs right along the side of their property. - Bradbury: Right. Corrie: But I see as one of the things you talked about here is an oiled access road so I'm assuming that you're going to try to control the dust on that With the oil. Bradbury: Exactly and I should have pointed that out. I mean the intention and Shari informs me that oil is not the politically correct term for that now. We're supposed to use something like dust abatement process or something. But, yes the intention is to minimize the conflict that may be caused by dust on that road by putting some sort of an effective dust abatement material on there. Whatever that stuff is. I don't know what it is. We certainly don't object - it shows in our phasing plan as far as what we're doing. If the Council wants to require that that road be, the dust be kept off of it down on that road that's fine. As you know, that road is being presently used by St. Luke's as a construction access. It would be Touch Marks intention to continue to use that road during the first phase construction and then ultimately of course they'll have their interior roads and be Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 14 able to move it over. The very next phase, phase 2 that road is going to go away because that's where the next phase is at least presently scheduled to go. I guess what Touch Mark would like to be able to do is continue to utilize that construction road and if we need to get some effective dust control measures we certainly will. Corrie: The other question I had Steve is in your phase 2 and 3 they talk about construction of street base for phase 2 cui de sacs and things like that. Construction of street base - Are we talking about a completed street that has pit ron road mix and asphalt on it or are we just talking about a base that consist of pitron or what are we talking about? Bradbury: Well, my expectation would be that on a phase by phase basis we're going to construct the road from bottom up. You know, the utilities and then the base and then I guess the asphalt on top of that. If the phasing plan doesn't make that - and it may simply be just the problem with what Gary's talking about the timing of it. If in fact what we need to do is we need to get the asphalt on there and have the road completed prior to occupancy that's what Touch Mark will do. So, if there's - unfortunately I don't have as close a working knowledge of the precise plan that you have in front you having not being the author of it. But, certainly if there are any clarifications that need to be made now is the time and we're happy to do it. Bird: Any other questions? Thank you Steve. Mr. Mayor I've got a question for Mr. Smith. Gary did Steve answer some of your concerns and what would you recommend? That the asphalt be down on the roads where the - Smith: Mr. President, Mayor and Council. It's been my experience in dealing with subdivision, residential subdivisions that everything works better for the builders when the asphalt is down. Excuse me, not the builders, but the occupants have to have the asphalt down. We have had subdivisions that have proceeded with building permits with just a road base that'll support a fire truck with temporary street signs. With sewer and water piping installed under the road base and fire hydrants active. That has happened in some instances. However we found that when it does happen that way the subdivider has to have real tight control on the building on the lots and coordinating the final street construction. It's more difficult because the two operations sometimes bump heads. The trucks bringing building supplies for buildings will cross work being done by the street contractor and cause some problems. So it takes really close coordination by the developer when they do that. We found a lot of d3evelopers will now finish the streets before they'll start pulling building permits. But I think that at the very least that the streets need to be finished before the occupancy starts taking place on the buildings. We definitely require that in residential subdivisions that are platted. Bird: (inaudible) the occupancy definitely before you get to occupancy you'd have to have your streets in. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 15 Smith: Yes. We do need fences up to control building debris prior to building permit issuance. The issue with the landscaping being completed prior to occupancy, unless there's a problem with weather for example and can't be done, we really try hard to get that done ahead of occupancy also, Anderson: I had a question on that Gary. I mean since this is being done in phases, it would make since to me that you' d do the landscaping in the phase that you're working on. I mean we're talking about the phase 3 or whatever it is. I mean that's clear out - that's phase 2. I guess a lot of that's out along the interstate. It looks like part of phase one would be too. I could see doing the landscaping in the phase that you're working on but not doing landscaping in the phases because there's a good chance you'll destroy it while you're trying to do the construction just like you talked about in building the roads. Smith: Right. Phase 1 has got most of the landscaping along the interstate. There's a short section, well short section maybe a third of it phase 2 along the interstate. Franklin Road is a little different. It's really split up amongst the phases in short sections as the phases are developing. I did have a question on landscaping on the west side of street A, the northwest corner. They don't show any landscaping proposed for that strip along there. Whether it was just an oversight or what, but I think there needs to be some landscaping up there in the phase 2. Anderson: So, does that make sense to you Gary? Do the landscaping in the phases that you're developing and then not the others? Smith: I think along, well, I should probably let Shari answer that. I think her concern is to maybe get it done all along 1-84 as part of the first phase. But on Franklin it's split up enough that it would probably be more appropriate to be done as the phases are done. Shari agrees with that. Bird: We probably wouldn't damage any in phase 2 along the 1-84 quarter any way because that's I if you put that in with phase 1 it's a small portion. You shouldn't be back up in there with construction vehicles. Smith: I don't know what the operation would be but I wouldn't think so. You know we don't have a landscaping plan yet so we don't know exactly what that landscaping is going to look like either. Bird: Mr. Mayor with your permission we've got an engineer from the deal. Would you like to speak? Unknown Speaker: Yes, I would. Bird: Come fOlWard. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 16 (inaudible discussion amongst Council) Briggs: Mayor and Council, my name is Dean Briggs, Briggs Engineering and I'm also representing Touch Mark in the engineering side of things. To speak to, let's talk the landscaping first. One of the reasons that we moved the phasing around a little bit is to accommodate the major irrigation line that has to be piped back there. That section we're missing, there's a big berm that goes there. We have a whole in the berm until we can get pipe through there and then we can finish that landscaping off. So, that's one issue. The only other thing that I was hearing in the comments. I think the paving is as far as I can see is correct for those areas that we're actually building. I think that what we're trying to do is in phase 1 we're getting back to some units that are on the far east side. So, all of that area from Franklin up across the face of the major building and over to those areas would be paved before occupancy. We do have some peripheral areas that we wouldn't want to pave before occupancy in phase 1 right off the bat but we'll want to as we do the continuation of the construction. The construction is going to be kind of phased a little bit also. The main building takes about a year and a half to build. The cottages takes 90 to 120 days. We've got a little bit of an internal phasing. The other thing to remember is this is not a subdivision. The contractor for all of the development whether it be the sewer, water, streets, landscaping and the buildings themselves are the owner. They have a full time construction manager. He's already on site and he will coordinate every bit of that construction whether it be infrastructure or the structures themselves. So, it's a little bit of a different colored horse so to speak. Any other questions? Bird: Council, any questions for? Anderson: You mentioned that you wouldn't want to pave some of those peripheral sections until you were getting ready to occupy, why is that? Briggs: Well, we're planning on doing, say like the sewer construction. We're going from over by St. Luke's well across to get those units. As soon as he finishes that he's going to bring the water and then power and telephone down that particular line so that we can start building on those first residential units. Then they're going to jump back and do some of the other areas. So, it's kind of a staged process. Some of those things aren't going to be done at the same time. It's just a scheduling issue. We've got a project that takes over a year and a half to get everything done. But to get the first cottage units up and ready to occupy, it will probably only take about 6 to 8 months. So, there's almost a ten month period where we're still going to be working on the project but we'll have enough finished so that we can show those cottage units and use those for selling purposes and you have to have an occupant permit to do that. Meridian City Council Meeting Apri117, 2001 Page 17 Anderson: I guess what I'm concerned about is any of the actual framing on the building that starts to take place and not having paved roads to get access for emergency vehicles and stuff like that in there. Briggs: Well, there's two - emergency vehicles would be accommodated through putting all the base down, we're actually extending that construction road all the way to the east. It will be an all weather road. It will be, we're calling it oiled, which is, actually what it will be is an oiled road and that is sufficient for the vehicles to get there for fire control. Then as we come up through from Franklin through the ACHD controlled roads those would be built and would not be finished until occupancy. But you're right they would be framing using a gravel road rather than a paved road. Anderson: I guess working in the emergency services business I've seen enough times where a framer falls off a roof. He's got a back injury. You have to get an ambulance down a construction road that's washed out because it's been raining and there's ruts in it because you've had heavy equipment driving on it I mean that's my concern is using a gravel road or one that just has pitrun on it. I guess I would rather see the paved streets in as much as possible before you get too far into that construction part. Like Gary said then it avoids crawling all over the top of one another and trying to move vehicles from all the framers and concrete guys and everybody else that" in there once you start that building versus when you're building the roads. Briggs: Right. Anderson: It just makes more sense to me. It's a cleaner operation. Realize what you're trying to do with your phasing but it - Briggs: It's truly a timing issue. If we have to wait until that time to get any sort of framing up outside of building the roads first and then putting sewer and water outside the roadways. I'm sure the City doesn't want that either. It's a timing issue. We won't be into this season's selling product As long as this project is gone on, that's going to be hard for these fellows to take. They have purchased most of this ground at this point. Anderson: What portions of the road are proposing paving in phase, is it all of street A up to around about 2 and street B and that's it? Briggs: No. In phase one A, we're doing all of A up to the round about- Anderson: The first or second round about? Briggs: The second. Then the southern half of the loop that goes right in front of the main building and then that portion of the east road that goes down to the cui de sacs. That's what is planned. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 18 Anderson: That would all be paved? Briggs: Not before framing but just before occupancy. Anderson: When do you anticipate the first occupancy? Briggs: I think the schedule at this point would be sometime in October. Anderson: Of this year? Briggs: Yes. Bird: Any other questions? Anderson: No further questions. Bird: Thank you. Briggs: Thanks. Bird: Council have you got any other questions? Any discussion? Anderson: Any further comments from you Gary after hearing what the engineer from Briggs had to say? Smith: Mr. President, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. I would like to get a clarification on the designation of LP low priority for those streets. I think what Dean is saying is different than what the designation or the definition of the LP designation is in the narrative for this phasing plan. It looks to me as though that becomes more of an R requirement where it'll be completed prior to occupancy. Briggs: I think we're offering that as a portion of the discussion each other have on phone conversations but didn't get a chance to do face to face. I think it's in everybody's best interest to get those streets paved before occupancy for those areas we're going to occupy. ***End of Side One*** Briggs: Is that clear? Smith: If we're going to go that route then I'd like to have it on the phasing plan that it would show- Briggs: Correct. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 19 Smith: ~~ more clearly, because the way this phasing plan is it's not definitive enough I guess to me to show the paving on those areas where you're going to be occupying. Briggs: Right. That is a modification of the plan that you've got in front of you given the tenor of the discussion or my assumption of the end result of the discussions. Anderson: I guess I'm just a little bit unclear from looking at the phasing plan. I'm kind of like Gary. I'd like to maybe see you guys sit down together and spell it out a little more clear for us lay people exactly what it is that the LP means and which things you're going to do first. Briggs: I think outside of that one issue, I think we're in pretty good shape. That and which landscaping is critical and which landscaping isn't because there's a lot of landscaping. We figured it was the boulevard and those things facing the major arterials. Anderson: It's usually these little issues like this that jump up and bite us later on. Briggs: Yeah. Anderson: I would feel better if you could sit down and get a little bit more specific about what things they want you to landscape right now and what things they would like To have paved at this point. Briggs: Yeah. I'd like to do that too. But I'd like to do it without delaying the project any further. Anderson: Believe me this Touch Mark's been our council agenda every month for the last year so I don't think we're delaying it that I'm aware of from the lack of putting it on our agenda. Briggs: No. There's been other issues but the phasing plan has been on the agenda for a couple of months. Bird: Thanks Dean. Briggs: Thanks. Bird: Council, we could throw out the approval of the CUP with the stipulation that the phasing and the landscaping be approved between Briggs engineering and the public works Department. That should not- Anderson: The landscaping and paving? r Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 20 Bird: Yes. That shouldn't hold up their project. If they can work it out. They're the professionals. I'm like you Ron, they get talking about stuff and I'm lost. I would feel comfortable as a Councilman with that being said in the motion and I know our public works department would see that it was done right. I just throw that out Anderson: I don't see them nodding their heads. Bird: -- for something - Briggs: We can do that. Sure. Bird: Do you feel comfortable with that Gary? Smith: Yes sir. Bird: Ok. I do too. Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Mayo, members of the Council. What I would suggest then is that you approve in concept the phasing plan as submitted with the requirement that public works and the engineer for the developer work out the specific issues with regard to additional definitions which street sections have to be improved before occupancy permits and which landscaping portions have to be done or bonded for before occupancy permits. If you do it that way they at least know that their phasing plan is ok,. They can begin starting that process and then I would expect within the next week or two they'll have all the detail down about what they have to do and what portion. Then we can go ahead and finish the development agreement, finish the addendum to the development agreement with the phasing plan in it and have that done. Anderson: I'll second it. Unknown Speaker: You can't do that. Anderson: Oh all right. Unknown Speaker: May I address the Council? Bird: Council that's up to you guys. This is not a public hearing but I'll leave it up to - Corrie: Yeah I don't even know where you are but what is the reason for this? Bird: Who are you representing? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 21 Unknown Speaker: I'm with Montvue subdivision. Anderson: I personally don't want to turn this into a public hearing. I think I'm pretty cognizant of what the issues are in Montvue - Unidentified Speaker: Well, I just wanted to - I took some pictures outside my back door. Okay? I just wanted you guys to see what I see every single day. I've got a parking lot of cars back there, people can walk by. There's suppose to be a berm there. There is a berm however you know people can still see me when they're walking - Bird: Just a second. This isn't for Touch Mark? It isn't their cars or anything out there? Who is all these cars parked out there? Is it from St. Luke's construction? Unidentified Speaker: St. Luke's construction, yes. If Touch Mark is planning on continuing to use that construction road, you know are they going to park cars there too? Bird: Well that's something that I guess. They have to have a place to park their construction but it's a long walk from where they're parking there to where thay're starting their first phase. Unidentified Speaker: Yes. And how long is that construction- Bird: I can't believe they- Unidentified Speaker: --going to be there? Bird: I beg your pardon? Unidentified Speaker: How long are they going to keep that construction road open? Bird: I would guess until they- Anderson: Through phase 1 and - Bird: -- phase 1. Then the permanent road will be in. That would be my guess that the construction road. Well, actually that construction road as it goes now to the St' Luke's won't go back to phase 1. There'll have to be another road put in I believe. That one that's existing they can come off there for a ways but then they've got to shoot to the southeast to get back to where their phase 1 is as I recall out there. I would think St. Luke's should be winding up their construction. It looks like their construction's about done out there. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 22 Unknown Speaker: I would think so. I know they came through, somebody came through today and finally oiled the road after our letter got sent to them. Bird: Well, it did. The dust abatement will be taken care of by Touch Mark. That's becoming a very touchy subject with construction. This is not a Public Hearing. Unknown Speaker: Okay. Bird: Thank you. Anderson: You've got one Councilman had to make a phone call. You're not going to be able to do too much until he gets back. Bird: Sorry for the delay. I can brief you on (inaudible). Corrie: Well, I need him here. I'm going to introduce Stacy. Bird: Okay. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bird: Okay. Counsel, I'll finish out this one and then give it over to the Mayor so it gets done right. What's you - Any more discussion? If not I'll entertain a motion on the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the CUP 99~039. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Nichols: Mr. President, Mayor, members of Council. Let's address specifically the phasing plan - Bird: Okay. Nichols: -- so that we can put it in the addendum to the development agreement and get all that stuff done. Then we'll do the CUP concurrently with the annexation ordinance. Anderson: Mr. President. Bird: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion that we approve the phasing plan as presented with a contingency that the engineer get with our public works staff and our Planning and Zoning Director and work out the specific requirements on which areas need to be landscaped and which roads need to be paved at this point and subject upon an agreement between our public works and Planning I Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 23 and Zoning on what those areas would be. That those things be done prior to occupancy permits being issued. Corrie: Second. Bird: Okay. It's been moved second any more discussion? Hearing none, all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: Mr. Mayor you can have it. Corrie: Thank you. Sorry I'm late today. I ran into a little problem. My son broke his shoulder Thursday and then tonight he fell down the stairs again. I told him a 40-year-old person shouldn't be doing that. I would like to take just a little bit of time and I'd like to introduce Stacy Kilchenman to the Council. She's going to be our new Finance Director. I've asked her to come here tonight and being late, I'm sorry Stacy. Stacy will be our new finance director she will be coming on board April 30th. Is that right Stacy? As you know, we got some of the staff over here and this is the Council. People you'll be working with quite diligently from April 30th to eternity I suppose. Welcome aboard Stacy. If you can make time to come in. We'll see what we need to do and get some information for you and whatever for your office. Thank you for coming tonight. I apologize for not being here to introduce you first. Thank you for coming tonight. Kilchenman: Nice to meet you. Bird: Nice to meet you. Corrie: Okay. I believe we are down to Item 5. Is that correct? Item 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) Bird: Yes 5P, 5Q, and 5R Corrie: P, Q, and R to be addressed on Item No.5 of the Consent Agenda. I believe that was asked to be tabled correct? Bird: Yes. Mr. Mayor Anderson: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 24 Anderson: I have a question of procedurally wise. We did not approve these findings for the CUP. So, do we need to table those or do we need to take action on those at this point? Nichols: I would table those Councilman Anderson. Anderson: Okay. Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: In light of that then I would make a motion that we table the Findings of Facts for the CUP or PUD for Touch Mark Living Centers until May 1st. Corrie: All right. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and seconded to table the CUP Findings of Facts until May 1st. Any further discussions? All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Corrie: Okay. Now then I guess we're ready for P, Q and R. P. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.764 acres from RT to R-40 and C-G for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we table the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval of the Locust Grove Place by B & A to May 1,2001. McCandless: I'll second. Corrie: Motion's been made to table Item P for the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the request for annexation and zoning is that correct? Bird: Yes. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 25 Corrie: Okay. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Q, Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 01-002 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 building lots and 2 other lots on 11.764 acres in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we move the facts and conclusion law for approval on the preliminary plat of seven building lots and two other lots on 11.64 acres in the proposed R-40 zone. Proposed by Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers to May 1, 2001 . McCandless: Second. Corrie: The motion's been made and seconded to table Item No. Q request for Preliminary Plat to May 1, 2001. Any further discussion? MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) R. Tabled from April 17, 2001: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 180-unit apartment complex and a planned development in a proposed R-40 and C-G zone for proposed Locust Grove Place by B & A Engineers - west side of Locust Grove Road, south of Fairview Avenue: Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird Bird: I move that we move the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval of CUP 01-003 request for Conditional Use Permit for 180 unit Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 26 apartment complex, a planned development in a proposed R-40an C-G zone for the proposed Locust Grove Place by B7 A Engineers to May1 , 2001. McCand less: Second. Corrie: Okay. Motion's been made and second to move Item R to 5-1 of 2001 which is the Conditional Use Permit. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Corrie: Did you mention to the public that items 11 and 12 will be tabled? Bird: No did not. Corrie: By request? Okay. Bird: I'm sorry Mayor. Corrie: At this time I will inform the public that item No. 11 and 12 that's the Cedar Springs request for annexation and zoning and request for preliminary plat has been requested by the applicant to table that until June 5, 2001. That's June the 5th of this year. I would imagine the Council will approve that request. The Public Hearing will be continued until that time on that date. Have some things that they're not quite ready for I guess Council. That's June the 5th at 6:30. Unidentified Speaker: We don't get another notice then? Corrie: There will be a notice - Do we have a notice in the paper or anything? Berg: Not a continuation. Corrie: That will be a continuation of tonight. You bet ya. Thank you. Item 6. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-003: Request for Final Plat approval of 31 building lots, 1 other lot, and 1 City lot on 8.04 acres in an R-4 zone for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers, lnc - south of Ustick Road, east of Linder Road: Corrie: Item No. 6 has been tabled from March the 20th. This request for Final Plat approval of 31 building lots and one other lot and one City lot on 8.04 acres. They are for zone for Tumblecreek Subdivision NO.6. by Pinnacle Engineers Inc. south of Ustick Road east of Linder Road. At this time staff comments first on the final plat request. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 27 Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council. We did have our comments prepared and a response received back from the applicant dated April 13th. They are able to comply with the ordinance requirements and we would recommend approval with staff and agency conditions. Corrie: Okay. Developer, is he here tonight? Any comments on the Final Plat. Boyle: Clint Boyle Pinnacle Engineers 1255 west Executive Drive in Boise Idaho. Just ditto Shari's comments. We agree to comply with the staff comments from Shari dated April 11th . We just ask for your approval of this final plat. Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Council, any other questions or discussions? Bird: I have none Mayor. Corrie: Ok. I'd entertain a motion then on the request for the Final Plat in item NO.6. Anderson: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion that we approve the final plat to approve 31 building lots and 1 other lot and 1 City lot on 8.04 acres in an R~4 zone for Tumblecreek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers and instruct the City Attorney to draw up the appropriate Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law decision of order. McCandless: Second. Corrie: The motion's been made and second to approve the final plat request and have the attorney draw up the proper orders. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call Mr. Berg. Roll-call: McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye. Berg: De Weerd's absent. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Item 7. Tabled from March 20, 2001: FP 01-004: Request for Final Plat approval of 48 building lots and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres in an R- 8 zone for Wilkins Ranch Village Subdivision by Steiner Development, LLC - east of North Black Cat and south of West Ustick: Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 28 Corrie: Item No.7 has been tabled from March the 20th. This is a request for final plat approval of 48 building lots and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres in an R8 zone for Wilkins Ranch Village Subdivision by Steiner Corporation. At this time staff comments for the request for final plat. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. You have our comments dated April 11, 2001. They were emailed to the applicant on that date but for some reason they were not received by Briggs Engineering. We did get a response today from Steve Arnold at Briggs Engineering. It appears that there's really only one item that remains, the landscape plan we feel can be worked out. However there is an existing irrigation pipe shown, I don't know if you have any of your maps here. It shows the Rutledge drain adjacent to some of the lots on the southeast corner of the property. It needed to be clarified and still needs to be clarified what is shown there. It looks like one of the easements that - the easement for Rutledge just kind of ends. If that is an easement for the Rutledge drain and that portion of the Rutledge is not piped some of those lots in there may not meet the minimum square footage requirements that was approved with this conditional use permit. So, if the applicant or his representative could explain further that one issue. That's' the only remaining item. If that item could be resolved we'd recommend approval with staff and agency conditions. Corrie: Ok. Thank you. Questions for staff? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Mr. Anderson Anderson: Just procedurally Shari, I had a question in my mind because we got the comments back from the engineer that said they didn't receive them until today. Then we saw your email that says they were sent on the 11th. Is there a process in place or something that we could do to insure that once you email, that you confirm that that was received by the applicant? Either a phone call or something I mean so we don't get in that kind of position that we turned a project or something else from somebody just because their email wasn't operating or it didn't go through? Stiles: We have had some problems with Briggs Engineering with their email system. Typically when we send an email, it comes back when they open it and it say it was read but we don't always get that from Briggs. So, it didn't click that maybe they didn't actually get it. Apparently unless they get their system straightened out, I think Gary and his staff had the same problem today trying to email something to Richard Cook. We'll have to until they get that straightened out call them to make sure that they actually got the email. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17. 2001 Page 29 Anderson: That's what I was thinking is maybe just a little PS at the bottom that if you receive please give us a phone call and then if you don't get a phone call from them that automatically in a day or 2 you call them. Stiles: Well, the email works pretty well because it will say that they've read it. It'll show right up on our email in Outlook that it's been read. Corrie: Some of those system just says it's been received like when I get something form the City of Meridian it just says it has been received. It says this is not an acknowledgement that this has been read by the recipient and that type stuff. IT just means that it got delivered to the server. Stiles: We may have to follow up with some and actually fax it to them as well. Corrie: Is the engineer or Engineering here tonight? Bird: He left. Corrie: They were but - (inaudible discussion) Corrie: Ok. Well, -- (inaudible discussion) Corrie: Ok. Well, we need some answers by the applicant or we can't - (inaudible discussion) Corrie: Pardon? Unknown Speaker: Which project are you on? Bird: Wilkins. Anderson: Wilkins Ranch. Corrie: Wilkins Ranch. Is that you? Unknown speaker: Just a moment. (inaudible discussion amongst Council) Briggs: Dean Briggs, Briggs engineering. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 30 (Inaudible discussion) Briggs: I guess the landscaping and the existing irrigation pipe was a couple of questions - Corrie: Would you like to hear it again? Briggs: Yeah it's hard to answer. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council, Dean, the Rutledge lateral there, has that been piped all adjacent to this project? Briggs: It's been piped on this project. Stiles: We just had a little question about how that easement is shown. It kind of just ends. The Rutledge Lateral easement just ends. Briggs: Right. It is piped from the point, well, if you took a line at the centerline of that easement and as that centerline hit the easterly boundary. It's piped from that point along the easterly and northerly boundaries. From that point south it's on the school district property. I believe that their sight plan shows that to not be piped but I'm not sure. Stiles: We haven't seen a site plan on it that I'm aware of but what our concern is if the pipe is not tiled then some of these lots in this subdivision will not meet the minimum square footage requirements because they have to meet those minimum square footage requirements exclusive of any easements for drainage or irrigation if they're left open. It's probably, do you see where it ends there, that easement ends? Briggs: Yes. That's about where it's piped. Stiles: It's piped to about there? Briggs: Yes. Corrie: From there this way. Stiles: Oh ok. Briggs: It's about the midline of lot 12. Stiles: So, the comment was that unless that meets the minimum square footage exclusive of that easement since it's piped in that location, then it may Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 31 not meet the minimum square footage. Maybe it will but that was what our comment was. Briggs: Ok. Stiles: If you could just calculate that. Are they going to allow an encroachment into that easement to go to where your lot lines are shown? Briggs: Yes. What they have told us is wherever you piped it the easement goes down to 30 feet instead of 60. Stiles: But what about where it doesn't, where it's not piped? Are they going to allow encroachment where it's not piped? Briggs: That's a good question. I haven't been in that loop so I can't answer that. Stiles: Ok. It's something that can be worked out I know. Briggs: Yeah. I don't think it really effects the square footage of 11 but it would for 12. Stiles: Yeah. You mean easily meet it on 11, on 12 it might be a little close. Briggs: My guess is that if that were an issue the developer would probably pipe it for that 30 feet or whatever it is. Stiles: Ok. Thanks. Corrie: Then there was landscaping - Stiles: We've worked that out. They apparently had another plan that was submitted separate from what we got in OUf application. So, Tom Souths doing the landscaping plan so I'm confident that will meet our ordinance requirements. Corrie: Ok. Council, any questions of Mr. Briggs? Bird: I have none. (inaudible) Corrie: Thank you. Any othef questions, comments, or discussions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Ok. Heafing none I'll entertain a motion on the request for final plat on the Wilkins Ranch subdivision 01-04. Bird: Mr. Mayor Meridian City Council Meeting April 17. 2001 Page 32 Corrie: Mr. Bird? Bird: I move that we approve the request for final plat approval of 48 building lots and 50ther lots on 10.19 acres in R8 zone for Wilkins Ranch Village subdivision by Steiner development LLC east of north Black Cat and south of west Ustick Road with staff comments and for the attorney to draw up the proper Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and second to approve request for final plat on item No.7 FP 01-004. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Berg, roll call vote please. Roll-call vote McCandless: aye Anderson: aye Bird: aye Berg: De Weerd's absent Corrie: All ayes one absent, vote's approved. Tabled from April 3, 2001: FP 01-002 Final Plat approval of 82 + 2 existing single-family dwelling lots and 6 other lots on 43.33 acres for Observation Pointe Subdivision by Victory 41, LLC - north of Victory Road and east of Meridian Road: Corrie: Item No.8 is tabled from April 3rd, final plat 01-002. That's the approval of 82 plus 2 existing single family dwelling lots and 6 other lots on 43.33 acres for Observation Pointe subdivision by Victory 41 LLC north of Victory Road and east of Meridian Road. At this time, I'll ask staff to comment on the final plat request. Item 8. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. You have our comments. We have received a response to the comments from Mike Kaven. They're proposing a change to the most recently submitted plat application that would bring the Kennedy Lateral and what was formerly shown as unplatted back into the plat according to Mr. Kaven's letter. Proposing a non-build agreement until they are actually able to sewer that property. We would agree with that proposed change under his site-specific comment NO.1. Under item No. 2 we could agree to that change in the wording. It talks about a sanitary restriction until the Black Cat Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 33 Trunk is extended. Mr. Kaven is asking that the sanitary restrictions will remain until the City lifts that sanitary restriction should another possibility be approved by Council. On item NO.3 I don't know if Will determined if that addendum had been approved, I don't know if that - (inaudible discussion) Stiles: The proposed addendum submitted by Mr. Kaven to the development agreement. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. I put that together. I don't believe it's formally been adopted by the Council. I put it together as a means of trying to resolve that issue on that, I believe it was on the 20-foot landscape wasn't it? Stiles: Do you recall what that issue was about the 20-foot landscape strip adjacent to the gravel pit next to them. That was a requirement of the annexation and zoning and also the plat. What Mr. Kaven had come back with was a suggestion that as each lot is built upon that individual lots would be required to put 2 trees on each lot. That was what his proposal was and that that would be required prior to occupancy on any of those lots. We had asked that the 20 trees be placed within that 20 foot landscape easement prior to obtaining building permits and logistically it is a problem trying to get the pressurized irrigation to each individual lot prior to maybe even selling the lots. We would have preferred it all to be done at once so that there was some kind of uniformity and also that we wouldn't have to bird dog each individual lot and go and make sure 2 trees were planted on each lot as they were built. But I would have no objection to doing that if we can call upon Mr. Kaven to be the one that goes after the builders and makes sure that's accomplished so we're not having to deal with individual builders on each lot. I think, he's shaking his head in the affirmative that he would be willing to do that. Corrie: We'll get it on record rather than shaking heads. Stiles: Under item NO.9 there has been a landscape plan that was submitted by Tom South for Observation Pointe. They've been working with Steve Siddoway. We would agree that the landscape plan, I'm not sure that I would word it that way. An approved landscape plan has been submitted. Mr. Kaven also wanted to clarify since one of our comments was that the existing homes would have to be removed from service. The domestic wells and or septic systems would have to be removed in that would have to connect to sewer and water. Mr. Kaven would like that clarified that the home located on lot 2 block 2 shall retain it's use of the domestic well and septic system for domestic purposes until such time as City services are available to the site. Corrie: Is that the home that is the little one along Victory Road? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 34 Stiles: Yes. Bird: Yeah. I thought we'd agreed upon that. Stiles: Mr. Kaven just wanted to clarify that. Otherwise we're just would recommend that the remaining comments remain as written and approve it with staff and agency conditions with the exception of the suggested changes by M. Kaven in his letter. There's no date on it, but it's stamped received from the City Clerk's office April 13, 2001. Corrie: Shari, one question. On number 9, what's the difference in how you worded that versus how he worded it? You're just saying it's an approved landscape plan and he's saying it's a plan that's acceptable. What's the difference between approved and acceptable there? Stiles: Because the landscape plan submitted with the final plat is not necessarily the one that was finally worked out to be approved with Steve Siddoway. Corrie: So,-- Stiles: What was originally - Corrie: -- referencing final plat doesn't work is that what you're saying? Stiles: I guess what I'm saying is I don't know that the landscape plan submitted with the final plat and the one that was finally approved are the same plan. Corrie: Ok. Stiles: But there has been a plan approved, I just am not sure of the date. (inaudible discussion) Bird: Shari, excuse me Mr. Mayor. Down below on the domestic wells and septic, now the lot 2 block 2 I understand. That's the lower one. How about the lot 4 block 5? Is that the original; is that the Peterson home? Stiles: Yes. Bird: Ok. That's what I thought it was but I just wanted to clarify that. (inaudible discussion) Corrie: Who's that Steve Sideway guy? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 35 (inaudible discussion) Corrie: Yeah. I'll bet "it was. (inaudible discussion) Stiles: I can guarantee that the landscape plan will meet or exceed our current ordinance requirement. Corrie: Ok. Any other staff comments? Okay. I guess Mr. Kaven or somebody want to get up - Stiles: (inaudible) Kaven: Mayor, City Council. I think we've- Corrie: Name please. Kaven: -- Mike Kaven Rural Fork Western Corporation applicant. You know I think we've come to agreement on all these issues here. The battles been between ACHD and what they're requiring Until they recommend something so I came with unplatted and then Shari says no we want it on a plat so I think we've worked that out with staff. We'll deal with ACHD and figure out what they're doing. I think we're fine with the recommendation. Corrie: So, you're going to go after the builders on the trees if they don't. Kaven: Yeah. Just to give you some idea how I've developed, I'll probably build 85 percent of the homes in this subdivision myself. It's not going to be a wham slam out them in. We take very tight control. That's not only for our own protection but that's for the people that live in our subdivision protection. So, typically for me to develop the 40 acres will take me as many as 3 to 4 times as long as some of these other developments because of the type of homes that we put in the subdivision. We will maintain tight control and make sure those trees get in there. I'll be before you sometime in the future and if I get denied because I didn't put 20 trees I'll be shot. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. Any questions? Bird: I have none. Anderson: I have none. Corrie: Okay. Thank you Mike. Any other discussion? Hearing none, if you're ready I'll entertain a motion for the final plat on item NO.8. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17. 2001 Page 36 Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we approve the final plat. Approval of 82 plus 2 existing single family dwelling lots and 6 other lots on 43.33 acres for Observation Pointe Subdivision by Victory 41 LLC north of Victory Road and east of Meridian Road and want to show the staff and applicant's comments and for the Attorney to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Corrie: Do I hear a second? Anderson: I'll second. Corrie: Ok. The motion's been made and seconded to approve the final plat on FP0102 in Observation Pointe subdivision with staff comments and the attorney to draw up the proper form. Any further discussion? Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson Anderson: Just maybe Keith could clarify in his motion for me on 9 if he wanted. Shari's comments or the developer's comments? Bird: It was the Shari's comments with the landscape that has been accepted is not the one with the final plat that's accepted. Anderson: Thank you. Bird: Shari's comments. Corrie: Ok. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor members of Council. Roll call vote Roll-call: McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye. Berg: De Weerd's absent. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Item 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 3, 2001: PP 01-004 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an Meridian City Council Meeting Apli117, 2001 Page 37 R-8 zone by J-U~B Engineers for proposed Murdoch Subdivision No.2 - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: Corrie: Item NO.9 is a continuation of a Public Hearing from April 3rd. This is a request for Preliminary Plat approval for 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an R-8 zone by J U B Engineers for proposed Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 west of Locust Grove Road and south of Franklin Road. At this time I will continue the Public Hearing and have staff kind of bring us up to date on this first. The Council needs it. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Members of Council. The applicant ha requested a continuance of this last time because the variance had not been heard and it was up for tonight just as a point of order. Should we be dealing with a Public Hearing on a variance prior to acting on the plat or how should we do that? Corrie: Mr. Attorney, I'll let you give us the official word on that. Nichols: Mr. Mayor members of the Council. It probably would be appropriate to just go ahead and move the variance hearing ahead of the hearing on the Preliminary Plat so you can address the variance issue first. The variance would have to be granted in order for the preliminary plat to fit because of this thousand-foot block length requirement. Corrie: Okay. Since I did open the continued Public Hearing I will continue it to follow Item No. 10 which is a Public Hearing. I suppose that's around the rules of order - Bird: That's fine. Go for it. Item 10. Public Hearing: VAR 01-004 Request for Variance of the 1,000- foot block length for Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 by Howell- Murdoch Development Corporation - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: Corrie: Okay. I open the Public Hearing on request for a variance of the one thousand-foot block length of Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 by Howell-Murdoch Development Corporation west of Locust Grove Road and south of Franklin Road. As we have the Public Hearing now open staff comments first. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and members of Council. This is a request for a variance to the maximum 1 ,OOO-foot block length requirement that we have in our Ordinance. A variance was also granted for the subdivision to the west of this property because of the existence of the police academy the state law enforcement facilities there. In this subdivision of course you're aware that the new police Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 38 station site takes up the majority of the southern boundary of the property. We would like to have some kind of connection with the adjacent property as it's all undeveloped at this point. Another question that we had was about the access and if the Council wants to consider and approve the variance to the block length we would ask that they be limited to the one access on Locust Grove Drive as shown on their plan. The 3D-foot driveway that would be shared by lots 10 and 11 and also lots 4 of block 3 and 9 of block 2 not be allowed any access as they have proposed on their plat, no access to Locust Grove Road. The other connection that they have is to Adkins Way to the north. That will go through Medimont subdivision. Corrie: Shari, does Adkins Drive go through? Stiles: It will with this subdivision. Corrie: Okay. It's just those three the ones on the Locust Grove side that we're talking about? Stiles: Yes. Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Any other staff comments? (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) ***End Of Side 2*** Schultz: (Inaudible) 50 South Beechwood. Just to clarify from what Shari said. It was not our intent to show any access on to Locust Grove for any lot except for that one shared driveway that you mentioned. Those 2 corner lots on Watertower, we did intend to take access off of Watertower. Other than that I think you covered the points that the property to the west the D J subdivision was bordered on the south by the state police facility, on the north by the cemetery. That didn't provide any stub streets. We provided stub street with this one to the north into the south is the proposed City Police facility. With that we just propose a site plan as presented and ask for this variance. Corrie: Okay. Council, any questions. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Shari did we get easements for this for the widening of Locust Grove or any of that? Stiles: As part of the plat for this, you mean? Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 39 Anderson: Is that something that we asked them for. Stiles: They will be required to dedicate 48 feet from the centerline of Locust Grove. I doubt that's a gift. Anderson: Yeah. Stiles: They will be required to dedicate that as part of their plat. Bird: Should be a gift. Corrie: Perhaps the better price but that's not got anything to do with the variance. Stiles: Matt may be prepared to offer that as a gift to Ada County Highway District. Bird: I think he should after we bought most of that. Schultz: Yes. My clients not here to discuss that. Bird: Cash up front. Schultz: We are dedicating that to ACHD. I'm kind of new to the area as to dedications and gifts. My understanding is that it's kind of practice for ACHD to buy that. Anything above and beyond that's just an accepted practice. Bird: The problem is the City of Meridian is footing the bill for that on this deal - Schultz: I could - Bird: -- so if we could get any gift we could and we paid a nice chunk of cash for 10 acres of this development that was cash up front. If you would go back to your client we would sure be happy to put a plaque there with his name on it for donation. Schultz: (Inaudible) working hard to have plans approved, not approved but done. I know he is building sewer, water, roadway and all that stuff to provide access to the police site. I believe that's part of the deal as well. Bird: He's getting paid back for that. Schultz: I understand completely. I'm not going to agree or disagree - Bird: (Inaudible) Tell him that- Meridian City Council Meeting Apri117, 2001 Page 40 Schultz: I'll pass the word on. Bird: Pass the word on that we would be very very happy clients of his if he would donate that 48 feet of right-of-way along the length of his property and it will be to his benefit in selling his lots. Once we get that over pass over Locust Grove will definitely add to the feasibility of these lots. Schultz: Definitely the marketability is going to go up on these. Bird: I would like to - and they don't have anything to do with the variance or anything like that. I wish that he would get hold of the Mayor and let the Mayor and him see if we can't get it - Schultz: I know- Bird: -- at a reduced fate if not free. Schultz: I'll certainly pass that on to him first thing in the morning. Corrie: Just tell him that we need to talk- Schultz: Yes. Corrie: -- I'll be talking with Colleen. Schultz: Okay. Sure. Corrie: Thank you. Schultz: Thank you. Corrie: Just for the record it has nothing to do with your variance. Bird: No. It had nothing to do with that. We would like to recommend that you know because it does help your development. Schultz: I don't know what the price is. I mean I may, I don't know if it's a lot or a little. I don't know what the going rate is. They keep the engineer out of that portion of it. We dedicate - Bird: I know what we paid fOf the police station - Schultz: I saw it too. Bird: ~- and we paid a very fair market value. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17. 2001 Page 41 Schultz: I understand. Bird: Okay. Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Is there anyone with the public that would like to issue a testimony at this time? (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: Okay. I don't think there's any need for the developer to have a rebut unless he wants to say something else. Hearing none, does Council have any questions for the Public Hearing? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Then I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing Bird: So moved. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and second to close the Public Hearing. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES Corrie: Ok. Discussion on the request for variance? Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Given the location and the fact of what properties abut this and being in a commercial area and with the fact that it does go on out to Locust Grove and has to tie into Adkins Way, I really don't see any problem at all with approving this variance. Bird: I echo that. I don't think staff sees any problems with it. Corrie: Shari. Stiles: And you will put the limitations on the access to just the one lot to Locust Grove? Bird: Yes. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 42 Stiles: Okay. Thanks. Corrie: Okay. Any further discussion? I will call Mr. Murdoch or Howell. Okay. Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on the request for variance. Bird: Your turn Cherie. Corrie: McCandless McCandless: (Inaudible) - the one that has. Okay. I move that we approve the variance for the thousand-foot block length for Murdoch Subdivision No.2. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Okay motion's been made and seconded. I would assume that comes with the staff comments? McCandless: With the staff comments included, yes. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor members of the Council. Roll Call vote. Bird: Aye. Anderson: Aye. McCandless: Aye Berg: De Weerd's absent. Item 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 3, 2001: PP 01-004 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an R-8 zone by J-U-B Engineers for proposed Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 - west of Locust Grove Road, south of Franklin Road: Corrie: Ok. The ayes ( inaudible) Now let's go back to No.9 which is a continuance of Public Hearing. I had continued and opened it so we will have staff comments first. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and members of Council. Again this is for the property where the police station, new police station site is. It's for 11 building and 2 other lots. It is in an R-B zone. They will be awaiting any changes to the comprehensive plan Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 43 that might effect this property I believe before they try to develop it. We would recommend approval of the plat with staff and agency conditions. Corrie: Thank you. Stiles: Mr. Mayor. Just another point. I didn't know if we needed to have those findings prepared and acted on before we actually approve the plat or is that necessary? Just the final? Okay. Schultz: Matt Schultz 250 South Beechwood. I represent the applicant. We concur with staff's recommendations and ask for approval of the Preliminary Plat as submitted. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. Mr. Nichols, Shari raised a question. Can we go ahead and do that without the findings of facts on the variance approval first? Nichols: Mr. Mayor and members of Council. Until you actually adopt the findings, it's not final. You can go ahead and have these same motion on the Preliminary Plat then we'll have them together on the Consent Agenda at the May 1st meeting. Bird: The variance is in front of the preliminary plat? Nichols: Yes. In other words we would incorporate into the Preliminary Plat the reference to the approval of the block variance. Corrie: Okay. Is there any other question from Council for the Public Hearing? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. McCandless: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the Public Hearing on Item No.9. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Opposed? No. Motion carried. Okay discussion? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Okay. Then I'll entertain a motion on the request for Preliminary Plat on the Murdoch Subdivision NO.2. McCandless: Mr. Mayor Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 44 Corrie: Mrs. McCandless McCandless: I move that we approve the preliminary plat for 11 building lots and 2 other lots on 20.26 acres in an R-8 zone for proposed Murdoch Subdivision NO.2 and for the attorney to write the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Anderson: Second it. Corrie: Motion has been made and second to approve the request for Preliminary Plat on Murdoch Subdivision No. 2 Item No. 9 PP 01-004 and the attorney to draw up the proper form. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Members of Council roll call vote. Roll-call: McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye. Berg: De Weerd is absent. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: For the gentleman out there, I believe that's about 700 800 foot long and we're asking for 48. It's less than an acre tell him. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bird: What is it? Schultz: 23 feet. Bird: How much? Schultz: 23 additional feet, 25 foot exists so it's 48 total. Bird: But that's not all off his property? Schultz: No. 23 - Bird: Well, then he's at less than a half acre. Come on. Mayor, (inaudible) Corrie: The pressure's on me so I'm going to tell (inaudible). Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 45 Item 13. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Corrie: Okay. Water, sewer and trash delinquencies. This is to inform you in writing if you choose to have the right to a predetermined hearing at 7:30 PM Tuesday April 17, 2001 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged in the facts and defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain council. This service will be discontinued on April 18, 2001 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? Hearing none, you're hereby informed that you may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court pursuant to Idaho state code. Even if you do appeal your water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list is $39,311.96. Hearing that Council I will entertain a motion to approve the delinquency turn off schedule. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we approve the delinquency turn off schedule but as we had stated last month, we are going to add a day or two to it. I would change that from April 18th to April 18th and 19th . Smith: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Yes. Smith: May I comment? Corrie: Yes. Mr. Smith. Smith: The last time Mr. Mayor and Council, Councilman Bird. The last time we had turn off and we did it on 2 consecutive days there was some problem in coordinating turn offs and turn ons the second day. Bird: What would you recommend? Smith : The Water Department was asking if we could turn half of the accounts off this Wednesday and turn the other half off the following Wednesday, if that would be acceptable with Council? Bird: With your permission Mayor then I'll change my - I move that we approve the delinquency turn off for one half to be turned off on April 18, 2001 and the Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 46 other half on April 25, 2001 unless payment is received in full. The amount of the turn off list is $39,311.96. Corrie: Do I hear a second? McCandless: Second Corrie: Motions been made and seconded for the delinquency turn off schedule on Wednesday and Thursday April the 18th and 19th half-and-half. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 11. Public Hearing: AZ 00-019 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT-R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U- B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: Bird: Mr. Mayor, I believe that you had stated that we had not made any motions to table 11 and 12. Do we need to do that as a body? Corrie: Yes. I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. You're right Mr. Bird. Bird: With your permission then I would move that we table the Public Hearing the request for annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT to R4 for proposed Cedar Springs by JUS Engineers Inc. until June 5, 2001. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Yes. I need to open it. Then we can do that. We need to open it- (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bird: Do you have to renotice it if we don't open it? (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bird: I'll pull my motion then. Go ahead and open it up. Corrie: Okay. Then I will open the Public Hearing on item No. 11 AZ00019 request for annexation and zoning by Cedar Springs. At the request of the applicant I will entertain a motion to table that and to have a continued Public Hearing on 6-5-01. . Bird: Mr. Mayor Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 47 Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we continue the Public Hearing for the annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres for the Cedar Springs by JUB Engineers to June 5,2001. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and second to continue the Public Hearing on item No. 11 until June 5, 2001. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-018 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in an R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs by J-U-B Engineers, Inc - northwest of Meridian and Ustick Roads: Corrie: Okay. I'll open the Public Hearing now on item No. 12 request for preliminary plat approved for 33 building lots by Cedar Springs JUB Engineers. Since the applicant has requested that we continue the Public Hearing until June 5, 2001 I will entertain a motion to that effect. Mrs. McCandless. McCandless: Mr. Mayor I make a motion that we continue the Public Hearing on Cedar Springs to the date of June 5, 2001. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and second to continue the Public Hearing until June 5, 2001. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Okay. I believe that does it. I want to think Mr. Bird for - I need your phone number to call so if I can't be here I can - and I apologize for not being here - Bird: No problem. Mayor. I've got one thing that I - we had brought up you were out of town and I think it was a workshop. The Council had asked about having an appreciation night for our volunteer committees that we have throughout the City and feeding a Bar-B-Que and having H&M meats come in and do something before a City Council meeting. Somehow or another it got put on the back burner. We have a workshop which is the ih, 8th, 8th of May that maybe we could do it Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 48 starting at 6, with your permission. If you would like to do that. You have to work something out (inaudible) Corrie: You mean the 6th? Bird: The 8th. Corrie: May the 8th? Bird: And get all the Committees that volunteer their time and the people that volunteer their time and service for the City to come. We'll feed them hamburger .and hotdogs and potato chips or something like that. That was the feeling of the Council. Corrie: Where would you want to have it? Bird: I think we can have it right here. Right out in the parking lot or something, couldn't we? Nichols: Prior to our workshop? Bird: Prior to our workshop. Don't you think guys? That's what we discussed before and plus it'll be a good time to do some selling on our meeting tomorrow night. Corrie: Okay. So we charge a dollar to get in? Bird: No. This is coming out of your budget. (Inaudible discussion amongst Coul1cil members) Bird: Will said he'd split it with you. Shari said Will would split with you. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: I think we discussed that this morning didn't we Will? You're out of money. Okay, yes that will be fine for the May 8th. I'll get my secretary on it. I may need some help. Since she's not here, she'd be the one to help me. Bird: She'd love to do that. I volunteer her. Corrie: Okay. We got it. All right. It'll be done. Bird: Okay. Anderson: I just request that they don't bring that bar~b~quer over here. Meridian City Council Meeting April 17, 2001 Page 49 Bird: Anderson is not the Bar-B-Que. We don't want any fried Fire Chiefs again. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) McCandless: Do we have a meeting tomorrow night at- Bird: Yes we do at 6:30. McCandless: --6:30? (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bird: H &M Meats. Corrie: H & M Meats. What do you want to do hotdogs hamburgers? Bird: Chips and stuff. Corrie: With that I would entertain a motion we adjourn. McCandless: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and second to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) ~~YtD~~ KElT BIRD, PRESIDENT April 13, 2001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT Larson Architects PP 01-001 April 17, 2001 ITEM NO. 3-N REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval of 15 building lots and 1 other lot on 78 acres in proposed C-C and C-G zones for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center -- southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Findings 10~ tvff Contacted: Date: Phone: MaterIals presented at public meetIngs shall become property of the City of Meridian. APR 3 interoffice MEMORANDUM Cjty of Meridian City Clerk Office To: William G. Berg, Jj) Wm. F. Nichols If Silverstone Corporate Center by: Sundance Investments Limited Partnership or Assigns! PP Findings of Fact and Conclusions oflaw and Order of Conditional Approval of Preliminary Plat From: Subject: File: PP-01-001 Date: April 11, 2001 Will: Please find attached the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT, pursuant to action of the Council at their April 3, 2001 meeting. The Findings will be on the Council's agenda for April 17, 2001 meeting. Please serve conformed copies of the Findings upon the Applicant and the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works and the City Attorney office, if Council approves the Findings. If you have any questions arise please advise. Z:\ W ork\lv1\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Silverstone Corp Centr AZO 1-00 1 PPO 1-00 I CUPO 1-002\BergPPMem0411O l.doc BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 04/03/0 I IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER AND EAGLE ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. PP-OI-OOI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT BY: SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, OWENRS The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on March 20, 2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were Cornel Larson and Roger Anderson, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having received a report from Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and the City Council having received as part of the record of this matter the recommendation to City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having submitted the "PRELIMINARY PLAT, SILVERSTONE CORPORTE CENTER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (pP-Ol-OOl) _ 1 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT THE SUNDANCE COMPANY, PROJECT NO. 201~02, DRAWING FILE NAME: prelim_plat.dwg 12~14-00 4:25 pm, SHEET 1 OF 1, SURVEYED BY: LFC\PWL\WJS, DRAWN BY: PWUWJS, QUADRANT CONSULTING, INC.", SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, DEVELOPERS/OWNERS", submitted for preliminary plat approval and which preliminary plat for approval application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code S 12-3-3. Therefore the City Council makes the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by reason of the fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive Plan and Map, adopted December 21,1993, and the property is presently zoned Community Business District (C-C) and General Retail And Service Commercial District (C-G), and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System. [Meridian City Code S 11-7-2 I and K.] 2. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629. 3. It is determined that Urban Services can be made available to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-Ol.OOl) _ 2 accommodate the proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements and conditions hereinafter set forth as conditions of preliminary plat approval. 4. The proposed development is a continuity of the proposed development within the City's Capital Improvement Program and if the conditions which are requested by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the Assistant City Engineer and as proposed by the developer as stated on the preliminary plat there will be public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development if built in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will not create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such concerns brought to the Council's attention. 6. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as hereinafter set forth. 7. The applicant has submitted for consideration of this approval drawing of the preliminary plat herein designated as: j'PRELIMINARY PLAT, SILVERSTONE CORPORTE CENTER SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT THE SUNDANCE COMPANY, PROJECT NO. 201~02, DRAWING FILE NAME: prelim_plaLdwg 12-14-004:25 pm, SHEET 1 OF 1, SURVEYED BY: LFC\PWL\WJS, DRAWN BY: PWUWJS, QUADRANT CONSULTING, INC.", SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOl) - 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, DEVELOPERS/OWNERS". DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code 9 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER 1. The Preliminary Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "PRELIMINARY PLAT, SILVERSTONE CORPORTE CENTER SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT THE SUNDANCE COMPANY, PROJECT NO. 201-02, DRAWING FILE NAME: prelim_plat.dwg 12-14-004:25 pm, SHEET I OF 1, SURVEYED BY: LFOPWL\WJS, DRAWN BY: PWUWJS, QUADRANT CONSULTING, INC.", SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, DEVELOPERS/OWNERS," is hereby conditionally approved; and 2. The conditions of approval are as follows to-wit: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Engineering Technician III Recommendations as follows: 2.1 Applicant shall submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2.2 Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOI) - 4 2.3 Assessment fees for water and sewer service shall be determined during the building plan review process. 2.4 Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that has recently been constructed under the freeway and south to Overland Road. Applicant shall be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. This site shall be subject to latecomers' fees to reimburse those developers responsible for extending sewer service under the freeway. Latecomers' fees are based on total land area of the plat and shall be paid prior to signature on the final plat. 2.5 Water service to this site shall be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant shall be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by the City computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains shall be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 2.6 Extend sewer and water services through the development to the property on the eastern side. The applicant shall connect to utilities; however, no provision has been made in the preliminary plat. Location and size of the mains for these connections shall be worked out with the Public Works staff. Latecomer fees shall be applicable to this property. 2.7 Two-hundred-fifty- and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 2.8 Underground, year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Submit hook-up and design details based on FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOl) - 5 the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains shall not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 2.9 Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process shall review plans and specifications for the irrigation system. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system 0&1\1 manual shall be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year~round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for all landscaped areas. 2.10 Show all existing and proposed easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e., Eight Mile Creek easement). 2.11 Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Eagle Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Goldstone Way and Silverstone Way shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping shall be dealt with on a site-by-site review basis. A letter of credit or cash surety shall be required for all required improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 2.12 Eagle Road and Overland Road landscape buffers shall be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOI) - 6 currently shown. A variance shall be granted as they do not require a common lot for this property. 2.13 Applicant shall provide the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road and Eagle Road, both entryway corridors. Landscape buffers are to be provided exclusive of required right-of-way. Landscape buffers shall be completed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 2.14 Applicant is proposing gated entries into the subdivision. Access into the subdivision via gates is prohibited. Gateway features provided only for beautification which do not restrict access is acceptable. 2.15 Revise Note 4 of the preliminary plat. The Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District allows only pre-development runoff into their system. All drainage is to be retained onMsite. 2.16 Four lots in the preliminary plat (including the lot proposed for a City well) are within the 1 00 Myear floodplain. Detail plans for reducing or eliminating this boundary. All structures within the 100-year floodplain shall be subject to all provisions of Title 12, Chapter 9 of Meridian City Ordinance. 2.17 The legend needs to be revised to change the symbol for the section line to match the plat. 2.18 Adequate right-of-way is not shown on the plat or the site plan. A minimum of 48 feet from section line needs to be dedicated on both Overland Road and Eagle Road. Ada County Highway District may have additional right-of-way requirements near the intersection. The 35-foot-wide landscape setback shall be beyond required right-of-way. 2.19 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOI) - 7 2.20 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells shall be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscaping irrigation. 2.21 Streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 2.22 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfill. 2.23 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 2.24 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.25 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. An operation and maintenance agreement for joint drainage facilities shall be developed for inclusion in the CC&R's of the subdivision. 2.26 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance. 2.27 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOI) - 8 2.28 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks throughout development in accordance with City Ordinance. 2.29 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2.30 Applicant shall comply with ACHD requirements, and which requirements are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and dated March 14, 2001, and consisting of twelve (12) pages. 2.31 Applicant shall work with staff to connect utilities to the adjoining properties on an as needed basis. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 2.32 Applicant shall satisfy all fire code requirements including those pertaining to water flow and fire hydrants. 2.33 All roads shall be installed before building is started with appropriate street name signs. Adopt the Central District Health Department's Recommendations as follows: 2.34 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 2.35 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 2.36 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public Works Department a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOl) - 9 2.37 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Recommendations as follows: 2.38 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Eightmile Drain courses along the southeast corner of the proposed project. Any encroachment. within the easement of the Eightmile Drain without written approval shall be unacceptable. Adopt the Sanitary Service Recommendations as follows: 2.39 The Sanitary Service shall analyze each phase of development for specific waste needs per the specific tenants. Additionally, Applicant shall comply with the requirements from the City Council meeting of Tuesday, April 3, 2001, as follows: 2.40 The Plat shall contain up to 17 building lots, and the road requirements shall be according to ACHD's requirements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the / Ji.:!day of I/pYIL ,2001. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN ANDERSON COUNCILMAN BIRD COUNCILWOMAN deWEERD COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLESS Iv1AYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED~ VOTED~ VOTED ~~ VOTED~ VOTED --- ~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-OI-OOl) 10 Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. ~~!~~~\~~l~~~;~~~?'~'r $~ ()- . r-o?P0ft41;::;:'Y '~\. (~'J S~A~:) ) ~ ~~er 1S~~i' Z \Work\1vf\Meridlan\Jv1endlan 15360M\Sllverstone Corp Centr AZO 1-00 1 PPO 1-00 I CUPO I -002\FfClsOr~~ at~ 'f>~../' .....4)q4J:kn~~t:\\ \.'\\<;" BY~~~~~ ity Clerk Dated: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER (PP-O 1-00 1) 11 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DIS1RICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat - Silverstone Corporate Center s/e/c Overland RoadlEagle Road MPP-O 1-00 l/MCUP-O 1-002/MAZ-O 1-00 1 IS-lots The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Silverstone is a 15-10t office/commercial subdivision on 78-acres. The applicant is requesting a rezone from R-l to C-C/C-G. The site is located at the southeast comer of Overland Road and Ea2:le Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,629 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic impact study. This item is being placed on the regular agenda due to concerns of the applicant regarding stub streets and driveways, and also concerns from the property owner to the south regarding access through this site. Roads impacted by this development: Overland Road Eagle Road Interstate 84 ACHD Commission Date - March 14, 2001 - 6:30 p.m. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM Facts and Findings: Silverstone. cmm G;:ck,'b;/ {'11 ii / ()f2 j.;L Page I A. General Information Owner - Sundance Investments Applicant - Larson Architects, Quadrant Consulting R-1 - Existing zoning (low-density residential) C-C/C-G - Proposed zoning (general commercial) 78 - Acres 15 - Proposed building lots 1 -Proposed common lots 640 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 9,629 - Total vehicle trips per day 285 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 13,551 on 11-30-99 (e/o Eagle Road) Traffic count of 11,422 on 11-30-99 (w/o Eagle Road) D-Existing Level of Service Greater than E-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,300-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 54 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Overland Road is improved with 2-lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is a southbound turn lane on Overland Road at the Eagle Road intersection. The OverlandlEagle Road intersection currently operates at a level of service F. Eagle Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 19,790 on 11-30-99 (n/o Overland Road) Traffic count of7,498 on 2-2-00 (5/0 Overland Road) Traffic count of 44,397 on 10-19-99 (n/o 1-84) C-Existing Level of Service D-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 2,600-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 52 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Abutting the site Eagle Road is improved with two travel lanes, with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. North of Overland Road Eagle Road widens to 5-lanes. North ofl-84 Eagle Road is under the jurisdiction ofITD. Silverstone.crnm Sx.h ,l b ;-+ I;:-J fJ c2.. 0 7:L Page 2 Interstate 84 ~tof O-feet of frontage Interstate 84 is three lanes eastbound and three lanes westbound. There is an "ON" and "OFF" ramp at Eagle Road. B. The Overland/Eagle Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections operate at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating area of the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at these intersections. C. On March 2,2001, the staffmet as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the Dismct's transportation system. TIle results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. D. A traffic study was submitted for the SilverStone Corporate Center in Meridian., Idaho. The key . fmdings of the traffic study include the following. · The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak: hour traffic (PHT) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). · At build out, the project will add 6,317 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the site, of these trips 847 will take the westbound 1-84 ramp, 2,504 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,966 will continue to the north. An additional 1, 100 vehicles per day will travel south of the site on Eagle Road. The project will add 1,380 vehicles per day to Overland Road east of the site and 850 vehicles per day west of the site. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Overland Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) F. It will operate at LOS F under background traffic conditions with or without the site being developed. 'This development should be required to participat~ in improvements to this intersection to bring it to an acceptable level of service. · The intersections of Eagle Road and the eastbound and westbound off-ramps ofI-84 will function at an acceptable level of service with the addition of site traffic. This assumes that the proposed signal on the eastbound off-ramp is constructed by ITD. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Franklin Road will operate at LOS F with or without the project. Improvements to tillS intersection will require additional right-of-way and coordination with other projects. Since the majority of the traffic will be coming from other gro\Vth in the area., widening of this intersection should be considered by the ACHD and ITD. · The intersection of Overland Road and Meridian Road will operate at LOS Funder background traffic conditions and LOS F with the addition of site traffic. Additional lanes are required to make this intersection operate at an acceptable LOS D. This intersection is within the limits of a proposed project by ACHD. The site traffic should be included in the planning of the ACHD improvements project. · The intersection of Overland Road and Cloverdale Road will require improvements to operate at LOS E. This area will probably see development in the coming years. It is recommended that the project will contribute to the future reconstruction of this intersection. S il verstone.crnrn ;;- xJv</o/1 'A II .3 of I:J-- Page 3 · The intersection of Overland Road and Five Mile Road will suffer a small increase in delay due to project traffic. Other growth will contribute to most of the deterioration of the intersection. The project should not be required to participate in the reconstruction oftIus intersection. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road will operate at an acceptable level of service, LOS E, after the build out of this project. · Eagle Road south if the project will operate at an acceptable level of service after build out of the project The site should contribute right-of-way for future roadway expansion. Since Eagle Road is on a section line, it is assumed that the future roadway will be a five-lane road. · Eagle Road north of the site wilI operate at an acceptable level of service after build out of the project. · Overland Road west of Eagle Road will operate at an acceptable level of service for a tIrree-Iane road. A three-lane road is proposed to be built by ACHD on tIus section of roadway. · Overland Road east of Eagle Road will operate at a poor level of service after build out of the project. The project should be required to dedicate right-of-way for a five-lane future roadway. In the interim, the project should be required to construct a right-turn lane and a left-turn lane for the full frontage of the project along Overland Road. · The project should be required to construct a signal at tile main entrance to tI1e site on Eagle Road and to the main entrance to the site on Overland Road. Each signal will require a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. E. TIle applicant is proposing to construct two driveways on Overland Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: · 400-feet east of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 265-feet east of western driveway (middle driveway) · 1,070-feet east of Eagle Road (public street) District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the following; .:. One access point for less than 150-feet of frontage .:. Two access points for 150-600-feet of frontage .:. Thee access points for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. . The applicant is proposing to construct three access points on Overland Road in accordance with District policy. The ACHD Commission approved these three access points on Overland Road. F. The applicant is proposing to construct five driveways on Eagle Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: · 400-feet south of Overland Road (northern driveway) · 690-feet south of Overland Road and 265-feet south of northern driveway (northern middle driveway) · 420-feet south of northern middle driveway (middle driveway) · 1,590-feet south of Overland Road (public street) · 410-feet south of public street (southern driveway) · At the south property line (shared southern driveway) District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the following: .:. One access point for less than ISO-feet of frontage Silverstone. cmm !:~{/b/--I- H/j I'. ~ a.jJ /c2- Page 4 .;. Two access points for 150-600-feet of frontage .;. Three access points for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. The applicant is proposing to construct six access points on Eagle Road. District policy allows three access points. Six access points would require a variance from the Commission. Staff recommends adherence of policy because the applicant is constructing a public street through the site and should have sufficient access internally and with three access points (two driveways and one public street) on Eagle Road. The proposed driveways are located on shared property lines and staff recommends that the applicant construct a driveway at the south property line to provide for future shared access with the parcel to the south; the spine road connection, and a second driveway located north of the spine road, but located a minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road. TIle applicant does not concur with staff's recommendation on the number of access points on Eagle Road, and will provide infonnation to the Commission requesting a modification of policy. The ACHD Commission approved three access points on Eagle Road with this application. One access point shall be located at the south property line, and shall be constructed as a shared " driveway. The second access point shall be the proposed public road, located as proposed.'. The third access point shall be located a minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road, and a minimum 440-feet north of the proposed public street that will be signalized in the future. G. The applicant is proposing to construct a spine road through the site with connections at Overland Road and Eagle Road. Due to the volumes of traffic this development is expected to generate, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. If the applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 7- feet wide, and the street should be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. If the applicant constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 5~feet wide, and the street should be constructed within "70-feet of right-of-way. Parking should be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant should submit a signage plan prior t9 fmal plat approval. H. The applicant's site plan indicates a traffic signal on Overland Road at the intersection with the proposed public street, located approximately Y.;-mile east of Eagle Road, and one on Eagle Road located approximately 1/3-mile south of Overland Road. It is not clear from the applicant's proposal if the intent is for the traffic signals to be constructed with the project, or if they are shown on the plan as "future". According to the submitted traffic study, at full build-out, the project should be required to construct the signals, and the necessary site improvements associated with the signals: left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Based on ACHD Conunission action, traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. The applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is close to being met. The developer should be fmanciaIly responsible for the cost of one-half of the signal. lithe properties across from this subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrant, the applicant ofthis site shall fund 100% of1he cost of the signals. At the time that those properties develop, a road trust will be acquired and this applicant shall be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. This applicant should enter into a written agreement with the District for these two traffic signals. Silverstone. crnrn Ex.)u'ht+ i/-tl/ ~o.p/~ Page 5 1. The applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for fun access driveways. TIle roadways are currently only 2-1anes in width, and the submitted traffic study determined that these lanes should be required. 1. TIle applicant is proposing to construct islands at the main entrances to the proposed spine roads. The islands may interfere with turning movements at the signals. The applicant should coordinate the intersection designs with District Traffic Services staff. K. Driveways on the proposed spine road should be located a minimum distance of 175-feet from Eagle Road and Overland Road, and should align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from any proposed driveways. TIle site plan shows driveways on the proposed street located within 25-feet of other proposed driveways, and some of the driveways are constructed with medians: such a configuration is confusing to the motorist. TIle applicant should revise the site plan and relocate driveways in accordance with district policy. L TIle applicant is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of the spine road, with driveways on both sides. The driveways are located so that motorists could make unsafe left turns from the driveways. The applicant should either: construct the island as a true roundabout, , eliminate the driveways; or eliminate the island. " M. The applicant is proposing to construct a local street off of the spine road. The location of the street conforms to ACHD policy. The street should be constructed as a local/commercial street: 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of- way. At the meeting on March 14, 2001, the applicant submitted a drawing indicating that this street would be stubbed to the undeveloped 80-acre property to the east. Based on the applicant's testimony, and 1he need for interconnectivity the ACHD Commission required this stub street as a condition of approval. The stub street should be constructed to the east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block L The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the east end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD VlILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUI1JRE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. N. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. O. Irrigation facilities should be relocated outside ofthe new right-of-way on Overland Road and Eagle Road. !;d, ~/f In (f h CJ.r I ~ Silverstone.crnrn Page 6 P. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be borne by the developer. Q. The applicant is not proposing to construct any stub streets to the undeveloped parcels to the south. Dis1rict policy requires stub streets to provide access to adjoining properties. The parcel to the south is 27-acres, and that property owner also owns several surrounding properties. The property owner to the south of this site (Sutherland Farms) has requested that the applicant be required to construct a stub street to serve his property, and also construct an east-west collector street along the common property line to serve his property. It is likely that the property to the south will develop as residential, as is designated in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. TIle applicant has agreed to construct a driveway at the south property line that would serve as a shared access with the property owner. Staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct an east-west collector street along the south property line, as the applicant is constructing a collector roadway through the site and it is not needed along the south property line. lfthe applicant constructs a stub street to the property to the south, the minimum length of the road would be 750-feet. The average cost to build a local street is $80/Iine::tr foot. The approximate cost to construct a stub street to the south property line would be $60,000. Staff does not recommend the construction of a stub street to the south property line. The applicant is opposed to the construction of any stub streets to surrounding properties. At the Commission meeting on March 14, 2001, a representative of the parcel to the south testified on behalf of Sutherland Farms and requested a stub street to the south property line. The ACHD Commission required the construction of a shared driveway at the south property line, but did not require the construction of a stub street to the south. R. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. S. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. T. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes ofth.is should be required on the fmal plat. U. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. V. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Silverstone. crnrn E Xll/ b /f I~/-l /1 7 c;.{' /:;L Page 7 Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. W. A Transportation Management Association (T.M.t\) or Transportation Management Organization (TNfO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMAlTMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. x. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development at accepted levels of service with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersection. Special Recommendation to ITD: 1. According to the submitted traffic study, the proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic CADT) of 9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak. hour traffic (PHT) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). At build out, the project will add 6,317 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the site, of these trips 847 will take the westbound 1-84 ramp, 2,504 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,966 will continue to the north. Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: 1. In order to reduce trips to and from tillS development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TNfA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. The Overland/Eagle Road and MeridianiOverland Road intersections operate at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating area of the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. The subject site' s additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at these intersections. 4. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development at accepted levels of service with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersection. Silverstone.cmm t' xA /6 /1 1'/1 II f of /:J- Page 8 The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 54 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs fIrSt. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 2. Dedicate 52 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road abutting the parcel by' means of recordation of a fmal subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs fIrSt. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of aU requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 3. The following access points on Overland Road are approved with this application: · 400-feet east of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 265-feet east of western driveway (middle driveway) · l,070-feet east of Eagle Road (public street) 4. The following access points on Eagle Road are approved with this application: · A minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road and a minimum 440-feet north of the proposed public street. · l,590-feet south of Overland Road (public street) · At the south property line (shared southern driveway) 5. Construct a spine road through the site with connections at Overland Road and Eagle Road, located as proposed. Construct the roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. lfthe applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 7- feet wide, and the street shall be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. lfthe applicant constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 5-feet wide, and the street shall be constructed within 70-feet of right-of-way. Parking shall be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to fmal plat approval. 6. This applicant should enter into a written agreement with the District for the construction, timing and funding of the two proposed traffic signals: one on Overland Road located at the quarter- mile, and one on Eagle Road at approximately the half-mile. S iI verstone. cmrn E;vh,'h/I PI1(/ 90+ Id- Page 9 Traffic signals cannot be instaIled at these intersections until there is a warrant. The applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is close to being met. The developer shall be fmanciaIly responsible for the cost of one- half of the signal. If the properties across from this subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrant, the applicant ofthis site shall fund 100% of the cost of the signals. At the time that those properties across the street develop, a road trust wiII be acquired and this applicant shall be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. 7. Construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for full access driveways. 8. The applicant shall coordinate the intersection designs with District Traffic Services staff. 9. Driveways on the proposed spine road shall be located a minimum distance of 175-feet from Eagle Road and Overland Road, and shall align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from any proposed driveways. 10. The applicant is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of the spine road, with driveways on both sides. The applicant shall: construct the island as a true roundabout; eliminate the driveways; or eliminate the island. 11. Stub Titanium Way to the east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1. Construct Titanium Way as a 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of-way, with a standard turnaround at the south end. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the east end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE", Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 12. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file. numbers) for details. 13. Irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the new right-of-way on Overland Road and Eagle Road. 14. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 15. Construct a 5wfoot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 16. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. Silverstone,crnm k:LJlr<6/f 'li-If /0 oP/~ Page 1 0 18. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Eagle Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the fInal plat. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specificallv identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of whv such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or ineauitv. The written request shaH be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the dav scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shan be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. l~iter ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration ofihe Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. lfthe Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada Cou~ty Highway Dis1rict Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify ail improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verifY all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact Silverstone.cmm ExA/'b;f (/f(/ /lofl /~ Page 11 ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions offuis approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District 9. Any change by ihe applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Develooment Staff March 14. 2001 Silverstone.crnm EX-h/6/1 '/-t 'r' /.;L 0 -f}/ ;;;L. Page 12 STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BElWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ON THE BASIS OF A STIPULATED PRICE THIS AGREEMENT is dated the ~ day of Af.Y" \ in the year 2001 by and between City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho (hereinafter called OWNER) and _ JC CONSTRUCTORS INC. (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 1. WORK The CONTRACTOR will complete all Work as specified or indicated in the contract Documents. The WORK is generally described as follows: All labor, equipment and materials required to install approximately 170 lineal feet of 6-inch diameter PVC underground drain pipeline, 6-inch ductile iron piping and miscellaneous fittings and connections and related work. The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents is described as follows: WWTP DIGESTER DRAIN LINE Article 2. ENGINEER Keller Associates designed this Project. The City of Meridian Public Works Department is to act as OWNER's representative, assume all duties and responsibilities and have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Article 3. CONTRACT TIME. The Work will be substantially completed within thirty (30) calendar days from the date when the Contract Time commences to run. Time is of the essence. Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE. OWNER will pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the Work the lump sum amount of sixteen thousand five hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($16 500.0m. Article 5. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. The CONTRACTOR will submit an Application for Payment upon completion of the Work. Applications for Payment must be submitted to the Public Works Department. . . Payments. The OWNER will make progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of CONTRACTOR's Application for Payment as recommended by the Public Works Department, on or about the 15th day of each month during construction for Applications submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the 1st day of that month. All progress payments will be on the basis of the progress of the work measured by the schedule of values established in Article 4. The OWNER may retain up to 5% of the amount of the payment until final completion and acceptance of all Work covered by this Agreement. Upon completion and acceptance of the Work, payment will be made in full, including retained percentages, less authorized deductions, within thirty (30) days. Article 6. INTEREST. All moneys not paid when due will bear interest at 12% per annum or the maximum rate allowed by law at the place of Project, whichever is less. Article 7. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS. In order to induce the OWNER to enter into the Agreement, the CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: 7.1. The CONTRACTOR has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of the Work, site, locality, and all local conditions and Laws and Regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the Work. 7.2. The CONTRACTOR has studied carefully all drawings of physical conditions. 7.3. The CONTRACTOR has given Public Works Department written notice of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies that he has discovered and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. . Article 8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR concerning the Work consist of the following: 8.1 This Agreement. 8.2 Exhibits: t8 this: ^ greement. 8.3 Inf8rmati8A Fer 8iEiEiSFS. 8.4 Drawings: Sheets 1 through 4 by Keller Associates sealed March 22, 2001, entitled New Drain Une. 8.5 CONTRACTOR's Quote dated April 3, 2001. 8.6 1999 Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction, including Division 100. 8.7 Re"isi8RE t9 the StanEiarEi SI"lBGifiGatiem: :mEi Sl3eGisl Pm'1siens. 8.8 Documentation submitted by CONTRACTOR prior to Notice of Award. 2 8.9 The documents listed in paragraph 8.2. above are attached to this Agreement (except as expressly noted otherwise above). There are no Contract Documents other than those listed above in this Article 8. The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified or supplemented by written Change Order. Article 9. MISCELLANEOUS. 9.1. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interest in the Contract Documents will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and specifically but without limitation moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 9.2. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect of all covenants and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Article 10. OTHER PROVISIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in triplicate., One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER, CONTRACTOR and ENGINEER. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or by ENGINEER on their behalf. The Agreement will be effective on Ai Af1 14 J 2oaL-. own~ OF MERIDIAN By: {!U.<t'lLJ ~~ By: Attest f 1:, It~C~~\TED ~~'i , \ 1"'" ~ OFFICE )\..ASORM:eRID~ CI't"i OF ~ City of Meridian Public Works Dept. Memo To: Mayor Corrie From:Gary D. Smith, PE CC: file Date: 05/10/01 Re: Construction Agreement - WWTP Digester Drain Line Mayor Corrie: Here are two (2) original copies of an Agreement for construction of a "Digester Drain Line" at our WNTP with JC Constructors, Inc. City Council approved this Agreement on April 17, 2001. I would appreciate receiving yours and Will Berg's signature on each of these two copies. When compl~te please place in my City Hall mailbox. Thank YO~ , . A Gary P"o- From the desk of... Qu:y D. Smith, PE Public Works ~ Meridian Public Works Department 66OE. Watertower~,Sui.te200 Meridian,. Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FLOODWAY APPROVAL IN PROPOSED C-C AND C-G ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND AND EAGLE ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS APPLICANT C/C 04-03-0 I Case No. CUP-OI-002 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to- wit: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (3001) of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the March 20, 2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code 867-6509,6512, and Meridian City Code 89 II-ISMS and II"17- 5 as evidenced by the Mfidavit of Mailing, and the Mfidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. This proposed development request is in an I-L zone and by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code 8 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. 4. The property is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is Sundance Investments Limited Partnership of Meridian, Idaho. 6. Applicant is owner of record. 7. The subject property is currently zoned R-l. However, there is an application before the City Council for annexation and zoning to C-C and C-G. The zoning districts of C-C and C-G are defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for a planned commercial development and floodway approval. The C-C and C-G zoning designations within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 3 require a conditional use permit n office and shop in an I-L zone. The I~L zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8- 1) . 9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. 11. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 12. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 4 proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning staff and Engineering staff as follows: 12.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept and mixture of uses. Significant changes to the plan as proposed shall require modification of the CUP. Slight modifications that comply with the overall development plan approval shall not require future public hearings. 12.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Silverstone Corporate Center shall comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12~6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. All commercial and office uses shall comply with 12-6- 8-B, Design Standards for Planned Development~Commercial. The City Council further requires that a conditional use permit be required if the applicant proposes a bar. 12.3 Site Plan: The copy of the single-story building master plan submitted with the application does not appear to be to an accurate scale. Detailed review of the site plan is not possible; only the concept is being reviewed. Detailed site plans that meet all parldng lot dimensional and landscaping standards per City Ordinance shall need to be reviewed and approved during the building permit process. 12.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space per City Ordinance Section 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Silverstone Corporate Center is not shown. Applicant shall provide calculations showing how this minimum criteria is met. The City's well lot shall not be considered for inclusion in this requirement if reimbursement is sought for the value of the property. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 5 12.5 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A planting island shall be provided to break up the asphalt every 12 continuous stalls. The site plan submitted does not meet this requirement. The detailed landscape plan for the Silverstone Point building is at a scale and meets or exceeds all landscaping requirements. All site plans shall be reviewed at the building permit stage to ensure compliance with the Meridian Landscape Ordinance. Review of the overall site plan is general only, and specific review shall occur upon application for building permits. 12.6 Streets and Circulation: The proposed project is designed as a stand- alone development with no provision for access to other properties. 12.7 Signage: Although signage locations are noted on the plan, no details of proposed signage were included. Applicant shall be responsible for proposing a sign program for the entire development as part of the conditional use process. 12.8 Trash Enclosures: Very few trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 12.9 Alternative Transportation Options: At build-out, this site shall serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. The City Council strongly requires an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. Also required is the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings. 12.10 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6 12.11 Applicant shall comply with ACHD requirements, and which requirements are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and dated March 14, 2001, and consisting of twelve (12) pages. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 12.12 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & 'AT elfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 12.13 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 12.14 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public Works Department a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. 12.15 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 12.16 All codes relating to fire hydrants and fire sprinlder systems shall be met. 13. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 7 13.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as Mixed/Planned Use Development". 14. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 17. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 18. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 8 "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. 967-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67~6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is othervvise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances. 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code 9 11-17- 3) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance; c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 9 the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; f. vVill not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in the Commercial Business District (C-C) and the General Retail And Service Commercial (C-G), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code ~ 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission," FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 10 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code S 11-17-6) 7. vVhen the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; B. Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained property; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - II 21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: I. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a planned commercial development and floodway approval in C-C and C-G zones at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development; Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning staff and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept and mixture of uses. Significant changes to the plan as proposed shall require modification of the CUP. Slight modifications that comply with the overall development plan approval shall not require future public hearings. 1.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Silverstone Corporate Center shall comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. All commercial and office uses shall comply with 12-6- 8-B, Design Standards for Planned Development-Commercial. The City Council further requires that a conditional use permit be required if the applicant proposes a bar. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 12 1.3 Site Plan: The copy of the single-story building master plan submitted with the application does not appear to be to an accurate scale. Detailed review of the site plan is not possible; only the concept is being reviewed. Detailed site plans that meet all parking lot dimensional and landscaping standards per City Ordinance shall need to be reviewed and approved during the building permit process. 1.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space per City Ordinance Section 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Silverstone Corporate Center is not shown. Applicant shall provide calculations showing how this minimum criteria is met. The City's well lot shall not be considered for inclusion in this requirement if reimbursement is sought for the value of the property. 1.5 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A planting island shall be provided to break up the asphalt every 12 continuous stalls. The site plan submitted does not meet this requirement. The detailed landscape plan for the Silverstone Point building is at a scale and meets or exceeds all landscaping requirements. All site plans shall be reviewed at the building permit stage to ensure compliance with the Meridian Landscape Ordinance. Review of the overall site plan is general only, and specific review shall occur upon application for building permits. 1.6 Streets and Circulation: The proposed project is designed as a stand- alone development with no provision for access to other properties. 1.7 Signage: Although signage locations are noted on the plan, no details of proposed sigrlage were included. Applicant shall be responsible for proposing a sign program for the entire development as part of the conditional use process. 1.8 Trash Enclosures: Very few trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 13 1.9 Alternative Transportation Options: At build-out, this site shall serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. The City Council strongly requires an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. Also required is the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings. 1.10 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 1.11 Applicant shall comply with ACHD requirements, and which requirements are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and dated March 14, 2001, and consisting of twelve (12) pages. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 1.12 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 1.13 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 1.14 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public W ork5 Department a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 14 1.15 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 1.16 All codes relating to fire hydrants and fire sprinkler systems shall be met. 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City Code S 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67.6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit and floodway approval may within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 15 provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of ~ ' 2001. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED$t"1./ 17~ COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED$-4- COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED ab~ COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED_ DATED: 4--/7-&1 MOTION: ~ APPROVE .~ DISAPPROVED:_ Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works lnUMtfllttt Department and the City Attorney. ~~d<\1 of Mf'f?~'{I"'{I" ,~~ ., ~\ (f ~uoPS'OF4l; '" >"$' ~ ".; BY~~#~~ ity Clerk FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 16 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat - Silverstone Corporate Center s/e!c Overland Road/Eagle Road 15-10ts MPP-O 1-00 lIMCUP-O 1-002!MAZ-0 1-00 1 The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Silverstone is a 15-10t office/commercial subdivision on 78-acres. The applicant is requesting a rezone from R-l to C-C!C-G. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,629 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic impact study. This item is being placed on the regular agenda due to concerns of the applicant regarding stub streets and driveways~ and also concerns from the property owner to the south regarding access through this site. Roads impacted by tills development Overland Road Eagle Road Interstate 84 ACHD Commission Date - March 14, 2001 - 6:30 p.m. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM Facts and Findings: &hi ',,;1 ''/1'' / J I~ SilVerstone. cmrn Page 1 A. General Information Owner - Sundance Inves1ments Applicant - Larson Architects, Quadrant Consulting R-l ~ Existing zoning (low-density residential) C-C/C-G - Proposed zoning (general commercial) 78 - Acres 15 - Proposed building lots I -Proposed common lots 640 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 9,629 - Total vehicle trips per day 285 - Traffic Analysis Zone (T.i.\Z) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 13,551 on 11-30-99 (e/o Eagle Road) Traffic count of 11,422 on 11-30-99 (w/o Eagle Road) D-Existing Level of Service Greater than E-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,300-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 54 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Overland Road is improved with 2-1anes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is a southbound turn lane on Overland Road at the Eag:le Road intersection. The Overland/Eag!e Road intersection currently operates at a lev;! of service F. Eagle Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 19,790 on 11-30-99 (n/o Overland Road) Traffic count of7,498 on 2-2-00 (s/o Overland Road) Traffic count of 44,397 on 10-19-99 (n/o 1-84) C-Existing Level of Service D-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 2,600-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right~of-way (25-feet from centerline) 52 to 48-feet required right~of-way from centerline Abutting the site Eagle Road is improved with two travel lanes, with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. North of Overland Road Eagle Road widens to 5-1anes. North ofI-84 Eagle Road is under the jurisdiction of lID. G"Mi.,'b:1 "II II :J of I#- Silverstone.crnm Page 2 Interstate 84 ~tof O-feet of frontage Interstate 84 is three lanes eastbound and three lanes westbound. There is an "ON" and "OFF" ramp at Eagle Road. B. The Overland/Eagle Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections operate at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating area of the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. The subject site's additional traffic will e::mcerbate the traffic problems at these intersections. C. On March 2, 2001, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts ofthis proposed development on the Districfs transportation system. TIle results of1hat analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. D. A traffic study was submitted for the SilverStone Corporate Center in Meridian, Idaho. The key [mdings of the traffic study include the following. · The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT)of9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). · At build out, the project will add 6,317 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the sUe, o/these trips 847 will take the westbound 1-84 ramp, 2,504 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,966 will continue to the north. An additional 1,100 vehicles per day will travel south of the site on Eagle Road. The project will add 1,380 vehicles per day to Overland Road east of the site and 850 vehicles per day west of the site. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Overland Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) F. It will operate at LOS F under background traffic conditions with or without the site being developed. This development should be required to participat~ in improvements to this intersection to bring it to an acceptable level of service. · The intersections: of Eagle Road and the eastbound and westbound off-ramps ofI-84 will function at an acceptable level of service with the addition of site traffic. This assumes that the proposed signal on the eastbound off-ramp is constructed by ITD. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Franklin Road will operate at LOS F with or without the project. Improvements to this intersection will require additional right-of-way and coordination with other projects. Since the majority of the traffic will be coming from other grovvth in the area, widening of this intersection should be considered by the ACHD and ITD. · The intersection of Overland Road and Meridian Road will operate at LOS F under background traffic conditions and LOS F with the addition of site traffic. Additional lanes are required to make this intersection operate at an acceptable LOS D. This intersection is within the limits of a proposed project by ACHD. TIle site traffic should be included in the plarming of the ACHD improvements project. · The intersection of Overland Road and Cloverdale Road will require improvements to operate at LOS E. TIlls area will probably see development in the coming years. It is recommended that the project will contribute to the future reconstruction offuis intersection. Silverstone.crom t;,.A,'h,. ., "11." .;J tI' /:J- Page 3 II The intersection of Overland Road and Five Mile Road will suffer a small increase in delay due to project traffic. Other growth will contribute to most of the deterioration of the intersecti"on. The project should not be required to participate in the reconstruction oft11is intersection. II The intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road will operate at an acceptable level of service, LOS E, after the build out of this project · Eagle Road south if the project will operate at an acceptab Ie level of service after build out 0 f the project. The site should contribute right-of-way for future roadway expansion. Since Eagle Road is on a section line, it is assumed that the future roadway will be a five-lane road. .. Eagle Road north of the site wi]] operate at an acceptable level of service after build out of tile project. · Overland Road west of Eagle Road will operate at an acceptable level of service for a tlrree-Iane road. A three-lane road is proposed to be built by ACHD on tillS section of roadway. · Overland Road east of Eagle Road will operate at a poor level of service after build out of the project. The project should be required to dedicate right-of-way for a five-lane future roadway. In the interim, the project should be required to construct a right-turn lane and a left-turn lane for the full frontage of the project along Overland Road. · The project should be required to construct a signal at the main entrance to the site on Eagle Road and to the main entrance to the site on Overland Road. Each signal will require a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. E. TIle applicant is proposing to construct two driveways on Overland Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: · 400-feet east of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 26S-feet east of western driveway (middle driveway) · 1,070-feet east of Eagle Road (public street) District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the following: .Z.. One access point for less than I 50-feet of frontage -:.. Two access points for lS0-600-feet of frontage .z.. Three access points for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. The applicant is proposing to construct three access points on Overland Road in accordance with Disirict policy. The ACHD Commission approved these three access points on Overland Road. F. The applicant is proposing to construct five driveways on Eagle Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: 400-feet south of Overland Road (northern driveway) 690-feet south of Overland Road and 265-feet south of northern driveway (northern middle driveway) 420-feet south of northern middle driveway (middle driveway) 1,590-feet south of Overland Road (public street) 41O-feet south of public street (southern driveway) At the south property line (shared southern driveway) Disirict policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the following: .:. One access point for less than ISO-feet of frontage Silverstone.cmm t;X.It""/1 'lilt "I J1/.:J-. Page 4 .:. Two access points for 150-600-feet of frontage .:. Three access points for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. TIle applicant is proposing to construct six access points on Eagle Road. District policy allows three access points. Six access points would require a variance from the Commission. Staff recommends adherence of policy because the applicant is constructing a public street through the site and should have sufficient access internally and with three access points (two driveways and one public street) on Eagle Road. The proposed driveways are located on shared property lines and staff recommends that the applicant construct a driveway at the south property line to provide for future shared access with the parcel to the south~ the spine road connection, and a second driveway located north of the spine road, but located a minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road. The applicant does not concur with staffs reconunendation on the number of access points on Eagle Road, and will provide information to the Commission requesting a modification of policy. The ACHD Commission approved three access points on Eagle Road with tius application. One access point shall be located at the south property line, and shall be constructed as a shared , driveway. The second access point shall be the proposed public road, located as proposed.' The third access point shall be located a minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road, and a minimum 440-feet north of the proposed public street that will be signalized in the future. G. The applicant is proposing to construct a spine road through the site with connections at Overland Road and Eagle Road. Due to the volumes of traffic tIus development is expected to generate, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. If the applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 7- feet wide, and the street should be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. lfthe applicant constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 5-feet wide, and the street should be constructed within "70-feet of right-of-way. Parking should be restricted on tIle proposed street, and the applicant should submit a signage plan prior tS' fmal plat approval. H. The applicant's site plan indicates a traffic signal on Overland Road at the intersection with the proposed public street, located approximately Y4-mile east of Eagle Road, and one on Eagle Road located approximately 1/3-mile south of Overland Road. It is not clear from the applicant's proposal if the intent is for the traffic signals to be constructed with the project, or if they are shown on the plan as "future". According to the submitted traffic study, at full build-out, the project should be required to construct the signals, and the necessary site improvements associated with 1he signals: left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Based on ACHD Commission action, traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. The applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is close to being met. The developer should be fmancially responsible for the cost of one~half of tile signal. If the properties across from this subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrant, the applicant of this site shaH fund 100% of the cost of the signals. At 1he time that those properties develop, a road trust will be acquired and this applicant shall be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. This applicant should enter into a written agreement with 1he District for these two traffic signals. Silverstone. crnrn /iu,'h,., PIl'. ~ ~ /~ Page 5 L TIle applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for full access driveways. TIle roadways are currently only 2-lanes in width, and the submitted traffic study determined that these lanes should be required. J. The applicant is proposing to construct islands at the main entrances to the proposed spine roads. The islands may interfere with turning movements at the signals. The applicant should coordinate the intersection designs with District Traffic Services staff. K. Driveways on the proposed spine road should be located a minimum distance of 17S-feet from Eagle Road and Overland Road, and should align or offset a minimum of 12S-feet from any proposed driveways. The site plan shows driveways on the proposed street located within 25-feet of other proposed driveways, and some of the driveways are constructed with medians: such a configuration is confusing to the motorist. The applicant should revise the site plan and relocate driveways in accordance with district policy. L. TIle applicant is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of the spine road, with driveways on both sides. The driveways are located so that motorists could make unsafe left turns from the driveways. The applicant should either: construct the island as a true roundabout; eliminate the driveways~ or eliminate the island. M. The applicant is proposing to construct a local street off of the spine road. The location of the street conforms to ACHD policy. The street should be constructed as a local/commercial street: 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of-way. At the meeting on March 14, 2001, the applicant submitted a drawing indicating that this street would be stubbed to the undeveloped 80-acre property to the east. Based on the applicant's testimony, and the need for interconnectivity the ACHD Commission required this stub street as a condition of approval. The stub street should be constructed to the east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the east end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus ofllie roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. N. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. O. Irrigation facilities should be relocated outside of the new right-of-way on Overland Road and Eagle Road. cUe/!J/IIIA" , J /:1- Silverstone. crnm Page 6 P. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be borne by the developer. Q. The applicant is not proposing to construct any stub streets to the undeveloped parcels to the south. District policy requires stub streets to provide access to adjoining properties. The parcel to the south is 27-acres, and that property owner also owns several surrounding properties. The property owner to the south of this site (Sutherland Fanus) has requested that the applicant be required to construct a stub street to serve his property, and also construct an east-west collector street along the Common property line to serve his property. It is likely that the property to the south will develop as residential, as is designated in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. TIle applicant has agreed to construct a driveway at the south property line that would serve as a shared access with the property owner. Staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct an east-west colIector street along the south property line, as the applicant is constructing a collector roadway through the site and it is not needed along the south property line. If the applicant constructs a stub street to the property to the south, the minimum length of the road would be 750-feet. TIle average cost to build a local street is $80/1inear foot. The approximate cost to construct a stub street to the south property line would be $60,000. Staff does not recommend the construction of a stub street to the south property line. The applicant is opposed to the construction of any stub streets to surrounding properties. At the Commission meeting on March 14, 2001, a representative of the parcel to the south testified on behalf of Sutherland Farms and requested a stub street to the south property line. The ACHD Commission required the construction of a shared driveway at the south property line, but did not require the construction of a stub street to the south. R. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. S. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. T. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-or-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes of this should be required on the fmal plat. U. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an _.AJternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual reportto ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. V. In order to reduce 1rips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Silverstone. crnrn li'u,'j," "/I" 7 J' /~ Page 7 Association (T1v1A) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. W. A Transportation Management Association (T:NV\.) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison behveen businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements) . An annual survey wiIl be required of the TMAlTMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Comrnuteride Office. X. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development at accepted levels of service with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersection. Special Recommendation to ITD: 1. According to the submitted traffic study, the proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHI) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). At build out, the project will add 6,317 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the site, of these trips 847 will take the westbound 1-84 ramp, 2,504 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,966 wiII continue to the north. Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: 1. In order to reduce trips to and from tins development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (IIv1A) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. The Overland/Eagle Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections operate at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating area. of the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. TIle subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at these intersections. 4. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generatedmby this proposed development at accepted levels of service with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersection. Silverstone. cmm !il./k,.6'" "17. I' 1 "p /:J-; Page 8 The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: I. Dedicate 54 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a ftnal subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs ftrst Allow up to 30 business days to process the rigllt--of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value ofthe right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 2. Dedicate 52 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a fmal subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. i~llow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. TIle owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 3. The following access points on Overland Road are approved with this application: · 400-feet east of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 265-feet east of western driveway (middle driveway) · 1,070-feet east of Eagle Road (public street) 4. The following access points on Eagle Road are approved with this application: · A minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road and a minimum 440-feet north of the proposed public street. · 1,590-feet south of Overland Road (public street) · At the south property line (shared southern driveway) 5. Construct a spine road through the site with connections at Overland Road and Eagle Road, located as proposed. Construct the roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. lfthe applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 7- feet "vide, and the street shall be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. lfthe applicant constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 5-feet wide, and the street shall be constructed within 70-feet of right-of-way. Parking shall be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to fmal plat approval. 6. This applicant should enter into a written agreement with the District for the construction, timing and funding of the two proposed traffic signals: one on Overland Road located at the quarter- mile, and one on Eagle Road at approximately the half-mile. eK,J,,'/J/! ''A" 9 ~/~ Silverstone. crnrn Page 9 Traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. TIle applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is close to being met. The developer shall be fmancially responsible for the cost of one- half of the signal. If the properties across from tius subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrant, the applicant of this site shan fund 100% of the cost of the signals. At the time that those properties across the street develop, a road trust will be acquired and this applicant shall be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. 7. Construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for fun access driveways. 8. The applicant shall coordinate the intersection designs with District Traffic Services staff. 9. Driveways on the proposed spine road shall be located a minimum distance of 175-feet from Eagle Road and Overland Road, and shan align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from any proposed driveways. 10. The applicant is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of the spine road, with driveways on both sides. The applicant shall: construct the island as a true roundabout; eliminate the driveways; or eliminate the island. 11. Stub Titanium Way to tile east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1. Construct Titanium Way as a 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of-way, with a standard turnaround at 1he south end. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the east end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE", Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 12. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file. numbers) for details. 13. Irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside ofthe new right-of-way on Overland Road and Eagle Road. 14. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 15. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 16. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of1l1e sidewalk with District staff. - 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes of this shall be required on tile fmal plat Silverstone.crnrn liu/IJ,-I '/9" I() oP It).; Page 10 18. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Eagle Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the [mal plat. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The reauest shall suecificallv identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written exnlanation of whv such a requirement would result in a substantial hardshin or inequity. The written reauest shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient1ime for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall svecificalIv identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include "vritten documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its ori2:inal decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify an existing utilities within the rig..ht-of- way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two fun business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shan contact Silverstone.cmrn !iJtJ,,1J/' "A" II of Jf}.; Page 11 ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: PlanninE: and Develooment Staff March 14. 2001 Sil verstone. crnm /:)1,11/6/". 'lI" IJ. ~f IL Page 12 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF MERIDIAN C/C 04/03/01 IN THE MATI'ER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FLOODWAY APPROVAL IN PROPOSED C-CAND C~G ZONE, WCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND AND EAGLE ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. CUP~OI~002 ORDER GRANTING CONDmONAL USE PERMIT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS liMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, APPLICANT 1. This matter coming before the City Council on the 1~ day of April, 2001, under the provisions of Meridian City Code ' 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the following action: 2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a planned commercial development and floodway approval in C-C and C-G zones at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS -1 a planned commercial development and floodway approval in C-C and C-G zones at the southeast comer of Overland Road and Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning staff and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept and mixture of uses. Significant changes to the plan as proposed shall require modification of the CUP. Slight modifications that comply with the overall development plan approval shall not require future public hearings. 2.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Silverstone Corporate Center shall comply vvith the follovving sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. All commercial and office uses shall comply with 12-6- 8-B, Design Standards for Planned Development-CommerciaL The City Council further requires that a conditional use permit be required if the applicant proposes a bar. 2.3 Site Plan: The copy of the single-story building master plan submitted with the application does not appear to be to an accurate scale. Detailed review of the site plan is not possible; only the concept is being reviewed. Detailed site plans that meet all parking lot dimensional and landscaping standards per City Ordinance shall need to be reviewed and approved during the building permit process. 2.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space per City Ordinance Section 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS -2 calculation for Silverstone Corporate Center is not shown. Applicant shall provide calculations showing how this minimum criteria is met. T~e City's well lot shall not be considered for inclusion in this requirement if reimbursement is sought for the value of the property. 2.5 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parldng shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parldng shall have two trees. A planting island shall be provided to break up the asphalt every 12 continuous stalls. The site plan submitted does not meet this requirement. The detailed landscape plan for the Silverstone Point building is at a scale and meets or exceeds all landscaping requirements. All site plans shall be reviewed at the building permit stage to ensure compliance with the Meridian Landscape Ordinance. Review of the overall site plan is general only, and specific review shall occur upon application for building permits. 2.6 Streets and Circulation: The proposed project is designed as a stand- alone development with no provision for access to other properties. 2.7 Signage: Although signage locations are noted on the plan, no details of proposed signage were included. Applicant shall be responsible for proposing a sign program for the entire development as part of the conditional use process. 2.8 Trash Enclosures: Very few trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 2.9 Alternative Transportation Options: At build-out, this site shall serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. The City Council strongly requires an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. Also required is the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings. ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS -3 2.10 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 2.11 Applicant shall comply with ACHD requirements, and which requirements are attached hereto as Exhibit <tA" and dated March 14, 2001, and consisting of twelve (12) pages. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 2.12 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 2.13 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 2.14 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public Works Department a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. 2.15 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stonnwater disposal and design a stonnwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS -4 Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 2.16 All codes relating to fire hydrants and fire sprinlder systems shall be met. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code 9 11-17 ~8, a copy of which is attached to this permit. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /1112- day of ~ ,2001. {; Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:d~~J5rJ cr- City Clerk Dated: 4-/1--tJ I ORDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS .AnA COUNTY HlGHW A Y DISTRICT Planninll and Develonment Division Dev~iopment Appii~ation Report Preliminary Plat - Silverstone Corporate Ct:nter sie!e Overland RoadlEagle Road 15-~ots MPP-O 1-00 l/MClTP-O I-002!IvfAZ-O 1-00 1 Tne annlieation has been referred to ACHD bv the Cirv of Meridian for review and comment. SiIver~~one is a IS-lot office/commercial sUbd-ivision o~ 78-aeres. The appIic:mt is requesting a rezone from R-l to C.C/C-G. The site is loc3.ted at the southeast comer ofOverIand Road and Ea!!le Road. TIlls development is estimated to generate 9,629 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic impact study. This item is being pbced on the regular agenda due to concerns of the applicant regarding stub streets and driveways, and also concerns from the property owner to the south regarding access throug..lt this site. Roads imnacted bv tillS develooment Overland Road . - > Eagle Road Interstate 84 ACHD Commission Date - March 14,2001 - 6:30 p.m. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM I I; I ~ I I l n~ ~\Iu::J Facts and Findings: &h, 'oil /'/1" / J /~ Silverstone. cmrn P~e I A. General Information Owner - Sundance Investments Applicant - Larson Architects, Quadran! Consulting R-l - Existing zoning (low-density residential) C-C/C-G - Proposed zoning (general comme~ciai) 78 - Acres 15 - Proposed building lots 1 -Proposed common lots 640 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 9,629 - Total vehicle trips per day 285 - Traffic Analysis Zone (T~~) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Overland Road Minor arterial \Vith bike lane desiE:nation Traffic count of 13,551 on 11-30':-99 (e/o Eagle Road) Traffic count of 11,422 on 11-30-99 (w/o Eagle Road) D-Existing Level of Service Greater than E-Existing plus project build-out Le'/el of Service L300-feet of frontagi;; 50-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 54 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Overland Road is improved with 2-lanes with no curb, gutte~ or sidewalk abutting the sire. There is a southbound turn lane on Overland Road at the Eaele Road intersection. The OverlandlEagle Road intersection currently operates at a lev~! of service F. EUE:le Road Minor arterial wim bike lane designation Traffic count of 19,790 on 11-30':-99 (n!o Overland Road) Traffic count of 7,498 on 2-2-00 (s/o Overland Road) Traffic count of 44,397 on 10-19-99 (nio 1-84) C-E:cisting Leve! of Service D-Existing plus project build-out Level or Service 2,600-feet of frontage 50-feet ey,isting right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 52 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Abutting the site Eagle Road is improved with two travel lanes, with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. North of Overland Road Eagle Road widens to 5-Ianes. North of 1-84 Eaele Road is under the jurisdiction of ITD. ~ - /;wIt.,'b..1 "1/" " af I;'" S ilversrone. cmrn P:lge 2 Interstate 84 ~Tof O-feet of fronrage Interstate 84 is three lanes eastbound and three lanes westbound. ll1ere is an "ON" and "OFF' ramp at Eagle Road. B. The OvedandlEagie Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections opente at a Level of Se.rvic~ F (LOS F), and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Adn County. Access control within the opernting area of the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intenection. The subject site~s additional traffic will e:!aceroate the tr.2ffic problems at these intenedions. C. On March 2,2001, the staffmet as the District's Technical Review Committe:= and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. TIle results orthat analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. D. A traffic study was submitted for the SilverStone Corporate Center in Meridian. Idaho. The key [mdings of the traffic study include the following. · TIle proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), ofwruch the peak hour traffic (PHT) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). II At build out, the project wiiI add 6,3 I 7 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the szte. of these tnos 847 will taka the westbound 1-84 ramo, 2,504 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the re'maining 2.966 will cDntinue to the norrh: An additional 1,100 vehicles per day will trave~ south of the site on Eagle Road. The project will add 1,380 vehicles per day to Overland Road east of the sire and &50 vehicles per day west of the site. II The intersection of Eagle Road and Overland Road is currently operating a! L:=ve! ofS~rvice (LOS) F. It will opern.te at LOS F under background traffic conditions with or without the site being developed. TIlls development should be required to participat~ in improvements to this intersection to bring it to an acceptable level of service. II The intersections of Eagle Road and the eastbound and westbound off-ramps ofI-84 will function at an acceptable level of service with the addition of site traffic. This assumes that the proposed signal on the eastbound off-ramp is constructed by ltD. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Franklin Road will operate at LOS F with or without the project. Improvements to this intersection will require additional right-of-way and coordination with other projects. Since the majority of the traffic will be corning from other growth in the are:l, widening of this intersection should be considered bv the ACHD and ITD. · The intersecti~n of Overland Road and Meridian Road will operate at LOS F under background traffic conditions and LOS F with the addition of site traffic. Additional lanes are required to make this intersection operate at an acceptable LOS D. This intersection is within the limits of a proposed project by ACHD. The site traffic should be included in the pianning of the ACHD improvements project. :I The inTersection of Overland Road and Cloverdale Road will require improvements to operate a.t LOS E. This area will probably see development in the coming years. It is recommended that the project will contribute to the future reconsnuction of1:his intersection. S ilyersrone. crnrn !;,.,A,'h:.f # 11.11 ~ rJ' /,:1- P:Jge3 11 The intersection of Overland Road and Five Mile Road will suffer a small increase in delav due to project traffic. Other growth will contribute to most of the deterioration of the intersecu"on. The project should not be required to participate in the reconstruction of this intersection. 11 The intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road will operate at an acceptable level of service, LOS E, after the build out of this project. · Eagle Road south if the project win operate at an acceptable level of service after build out of the project. The site should contribute right-of-way for future roadway expansion. Since Eagle Road is on a section line, it is assumed that the future roadway will be a five~lane road. II Eagle Road north of the site will operate at an acceptable level of service after buijd out of the project. · Overland Road west of Eagle Road will operate at an acceptable level of ser-v'ice for a three-lane road. A tl1T~~!ane road is proposed to be built by ACHD on tins section of roadway. · Overland Road east of Eagle Road will operate at a poor level of service after bu1Jd out ofthe project. The project should be required to dedicate right-of-way for a five-lane future roadway. In the interim, the project should be required to construct a right-turn lane and a left-turn lane for the fuU frontage of me project along Overland Road. · The project should be required to construct a signal at the main entrance to the sire on Eagle Road and to the main entrance to the site on Overland Road. Each signal will reauire a kft-turn lane and a right-turn lane. - . E. TIle applicant is proposing to construct two driveways on Overland Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: · 400-feet east of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 265-feet e:J.St of west em driveway (middle driveway) · I,D70-feet east of Eagle Road (public street) District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the fan owing: .:. One access point for less than ISO-feet of fronTage .:. Two access points for 150-600-feet of frontage .:. Thee access poinrs for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. The applicant is proposing to construct three access points on Overland Road in accordance with District policy. The ACHD Commission approved these three access points on Overland Road. F. The applicant is proposing to construct five driveways on Eagle Road and one public street connection. The proposed accesses are located: 400-feet south of Overland Road (northern driveway) 690-feet south of Overland Road and 265-feet south of northern driveway (northern middle driveway) 420-feet south of northern middle driveway (middle driveway) 1,590-feet south or Overland Road (public street) 41O-feet south of public street (southern driveway) At the south property line (shared southern driveway) District policy 7204.7.3 states thaI access points on arteriais are based on the foHowing: .:. One access point for less than ISO-feef of frontage SiIverstone.cmm G:t-Iz,b,~1 "A II ,y cP /:1- Page 4 -:. Two access points for 150-600-fe::t of frontage .;. TIrre:: access points for greater than 600-feet of frontage. Access points are considered to be both public streets and driveways. TIle applicant is proposing to cons1ruct six access points on E~gle Road. District policy allows three access points. Six access points would require a variance from the Commission. S taIT recommends adherence of policy because the applicant is constructing a public street through the site and should have sufficient access internally and with three access POinTS (two driveways and one public street) on Eagle Road. The proposed driveways are located on shared property lines and staff recommends that the applicant construct a driveway at the south property line to provide for furure shared access with the parcel to the south; the spine road connection, and a second driveway located north of the spine road, but located a minimum or .:!-40-feet south of Overland Road. The applicant does not concur with staffs recommendation on the number of access points on E~gle Road, and will provide information to the Commission requesting a modific~tion of polic:.;. The ACHD Commission approved three access points on Eagle Road with tins application. One access point shall be located at the sounl property line, and shaU be constructed as a shared . driveway. The second access point shall be the proposed public road, locaTed as proposed.. The third access point shall be located a minimum or 440-feet south of Overland Road, and a minimum 440-feet north of me proposed public street that win be signalized in the future. G. The applicant is proposing to cons1ruct a spin~ road through the siTe with connections at Overland Road and Eagle Road. Due to the volumes of traffic this development is expected to generate, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with c:Jrbs, gutters and sidewalks. If the applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 7- feet wide, and the street should be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. If the appIic:mt constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk should be constructed 5-feet wide, and the street should be constructed within'iO-feet of ri!Zht-of-wav. P:rrkin!Z should be resnicted on the proposed street, and the applic::mt shouid ~ubmit a ;ignage pl~ prior tl? [mal plat approval. H. The applicant's site plan indicates a traffic signal on Overland Road at the intersection with the proposed public street, located approximately }-4-mile east of Eagle Road, and one on Eagle Road located approximately II3-mile south of Overland Road. It is not clear from the applicant's proposal if the intent is for the traffic signals to be constructed with the project, or if they are shown on the plan as "future". According to the submitted traffic study, at full build-out, the project should be required to construct the signals, and the necessary site improvements associated with the signals: left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Based on ACED Commission action, traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. The applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met or is close to being met. The develooer should be fmancially responsible for the cost of one-half of the sig;a1. If the propem~s across from this subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrnnt the applicant of this site shaH fund 100% of the cost of the signals. At the time thatihose properties develop, a road trust will be acquired and this applicnnt shall be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. This applicnnt should enter into a written agreement with the District for these two traffic signals. Silverstone.c;nrn /ixJu'h'" ;fA'. 5 J Iil. Page 5 1. The applicanr should be required to consiruct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for full access driveways. TIle roadways are currently only 2-lanes in width, and the submitted traffic study determined that these lanes should be required. J. TIle applicmr is proposing to construct islands at the main entrances to the proposed spine roads. The islands may interfere with turning movements at the signals. The aooiicant should coordinate the intersection-designs with Dismct Traffic Services staff. - . . K. Driveways on the proposed spine road should be located a minimum distance of 17S-fe-et from Eagle Road and Overland Road. and should align or offset a minimum of l2S-feet from any proposed driveways. The site pian shows drive~vays on the proposed sn-eet located within 2S-feet of other proposed driveways, and some of the driveways are constructed with medians: such a configuration is confusing to the motorist. The applic:mt should revise the site plan and reiocate driveways in accordance with dismct policy. L. TIle appiic:mr is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of me spine road, with drivewavs on both sides. The drivewavs are located so that motorists could make unsafe left turns from th~ driveways. The applic:mt sh~uld either: construct the island as a true roundabout; eliminate the driveways; or eliminate the island. M. The applicanr is proposing to construct a local. street off of the spine road. The location of the street conforms to ACHD policy. The street should be constructed as a loc:lI/commercial street: 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of rig.bt-of-way. At the meeting on :.vfarch 14,2001, the applicnn! submitted a drawing indic:lting thatthis street would be stubbed to the undeveloped 3D-acre property to the -east. Based on the applicant's testimony, and the need for interconnectivity the ACHD Commission required this stub street as a condition of approval. The smb street should be constructed to the east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Bloc:( 1. Tne applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the e:lSt end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applic::m.t should be required to install a sign at the tenninus or the roadway stating that. "THIS ROAD \\'1LL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate th~ sign plan f~r the stub street, and the design or the turnaround with District staff. N. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District_ Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. O. Irrig:ation facilities should be reloc:1ted outside or the new right-of-wav on Overiand Road and Eag're Road. ~ . Iff r.Ja/!J/11I If" " '* / ~ SilverstOne. cmrn Page 6 P. AJl utility reloc::ttion costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be borne by the developer. Q. TIle applicant is not proposing to construct any stub streets to the undeveloped parcels to the south. District policy requires stub streets to provide access to adjoining properties. Tne parcel to the south is 27-acres, and that property owner also owns several surrounding properties. The property ov.mer to the south oft11is site (Sutherland Farms) has requested that the applicant be required to construct a stub street to serve his property, and also construct an east-weST collector street along the common property line to serve his property. It is likely that the property to the south will develop as residential, as is designated in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. TIle applicant has agreed to construct a driveway at the south property line that would serve as a shared access with the property owner. Staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct an east-west collector street along the south property line, as the applic:.mr is constructing a collector roadway through the sire and it is not needed along the south property line. If the applicant consnucts a stub street to the property to the south, the minimum length of the road would be 750-feet. The average COST to build a loc3.1 street is $30/line:u- foot. The approximate cost to construct a stub streetto the south property line would be $60,000. Staff does not recommend the construction of a stub street to the south properLy line. The applic:mt is opposed to the construction of any stub streets to surrounding properties. At the Commission meeting on March 14,2001, a representative of the parcel to the south testified on behalf of Sutherland Farms and requested a stub street to the south property line. The ACHD Commission required the construction of a shared driveway at the south property line, but did not require the construction of a stub street to the south. R. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construc~ a 5-foor wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk. with District staff. - S. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the 10c3.tion and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. - T. .A.ny proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-or-way dedicated by this piat should be owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes of this should be required on the fmal plat. U. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an ~<.\jtemative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transporta.rion Prmrram with the auulic:mt. For more information comact Pat Nelson at 387-6160.. - .. V. In order to reduce mus to and from this develooment it is recommended that the tenants occupying the propo~ed building(s) be reqUired to participate in any Transportation Management Siiversrone.cmrn 5u,tJ/' "AN 7 eI /~ P~ge 7 Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed wim a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to tIlis development. W. A Transportation Management Association (Tlvl4.) or Transportation rvlanagement Organization (TMO) is fanned with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, c:rrpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). ,t.1.n annual survey will be required of the TMAJTMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. x. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development at accepted levels of service with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersedion. Spedai Recommendation to ITD: 1. According to the submitted traffic study, the proposed development is projecred to g~nerate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 9,629 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak. hour traffic (PHT) is 1,021 vehicles per hour (vph). At build out, 1he project will add 6,317 vehicles per day to Eagle Road north of the site, of these trios 847 wiII take the westbound 1-34 ramo, 2,504 win travel~e::J.stbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,966 wi1l continue to the north. . . . Spedal Re~ommendation to Ciiy of Meridian: 1. In order to reduce trips to and from tills development it is recommended tImt tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Trans!Jortation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applic:mt. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management ;1..ssociation (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed wim a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development 3. The Overland/Eagle Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections operate at a Level of Service F (LOS F). and are listed as one of the 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating area of-the intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. TIle subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at these intersections. 4. Based on deve~opment patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, smff anticipaTes that the transporration system will not be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generaTed by this proposed development at accepted levels of sen:ice with out modifications to Eagle Road and Overland Road, and the intersection. S il'lerstone. cmrn t:'X,;IL$D,'t JIlt" 1 oP /~ Puge 8 The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final piat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedic:J.te 54 to 48-feet of rilS-ht-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by me:ms of recordation of a [mal subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs fIrst. .J:\.llow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedic:.ltion after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedic:J.ted which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 2. Dedicate 52 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a [mal subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. _~.llow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedic:J.tion after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to ey,jsting ACHD right-of-way. .J. The following access points on Overland Road are a!Jproved with this application: · 400-feet e:J.st of Eagle Road (western driveway) · 690-feet east of Eagle Road and 265-feet e:lSt of western driveway (middle driveway) · l,070-feet e:J.St of Eagle Road (public street) TIle following access points on Eagle Road are approved with this applic:J.tion: · A minimum of 440-feet south of Overland Road and a minimum 440-feet north of the proposed public street. · 1,590-feet south of Overland Road (public street) · At the south property line (shared southern driveway) 5. Construct a. sume road through the site with connecTIons at Overland Road and E:.ude Road_ located as pr~posed. Cons~ct the roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs: gutters ~d sidewalks. If the applicant constructs attached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 7- feet "vide, and the street shall be constructed within 64-feet of right-of-way. If the applicant constructs detached sidewalks, the sidewalk shall be constructed 5-feet wide, and the street shaIl be constructed within 70-feet of rilS-ht-of-way. Parking shall be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to final plat approval. 6. TIlls applicant should enter into a written agreement with the District for the construction, timing and funding of the two proposed traffic signals: one on Overland Road located at the quarter- mile, and one on Eagle Road at approximately the half-mile. E f(.,J, //J,. I ''A 1;1 '1"P I ~ S iI versrone. c:nm Pag~ 9 Traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. TIle applicant's traffic en!lmeer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is-close to being met. TIle developer shan be fmancially responsible for the cost of one~ half of the signal. If the properties across from this subdivision have not been developed prior to the signal warrant, the applicant of this site shall fund 100% of the cost of the signals. At the time that those properties across the street develop, a road trust will be acquired and this applicant shaII be reimbursed for one half of the cost of the signal. 7. Construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for full access driveways. 8. The applicant shan coordinate the intersection designs with District Traffic Services sraff. 9. Driveways on the proposed spine road shail be located a minimum distance of l7S-feet from Eagle Road and Overland Road, and shall align or offset a minimum of 12S-feet from any proposed driveways. 10. The applicant is proposing to construct a large island in the middle of the spine road, with driveways on both sides. The applic:mt shalI: construct the island as a true roundabOUT; eliminate the driveways; or eliminate the island. 11. Stub Titanium Way to the east property line between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1. Construct Titanium Way as a 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of-way, wim a standard turnaround at the south end. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the east end of the stub with a temporary easemenr provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FtJTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 12. Utiiity street cuts in pavement less than five ye:rrs old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387--5280 (with fi1~ numbers) for details. 13. Irrigation facilities shall be :-elocated outside of the new ri2nt-of-wav on Overland Road and Eag!e Road. - . 14. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shail be borne by the developer. 15. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abuttin!l the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District sfuff. 16. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ea!lIe Road abuttin!l the entire site. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. - 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-.:)f-way dedicated by this plat shall owned and maintained by Silverstone owners. Notes of this shall be required on the fmal plat. S iI verst one. crr.m bu",'IJ/' 'Ii" It) of I~ Page 10 18. Other than the access points specifically approved with tills application, direct lot or parcel access to OverIa.'1d Road and Eagle Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the fmal plat. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The reQuest shall snecificallv identify each reauirement to be reconsidered and include a written exnlanation of why such a reauirement would result in a substantial hardsmo or ineauity. The written reauest shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the dav scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. .After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of SI1O.00. The reauest for reconsideration shall svecificaIlv identify each rea uirem ent to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its ori!!inal decision. The request for reconsideration will be he:rrd bv the District Commission at the next regular meetin!! oftlle Commission. If the Commission ;erees to reconsider the action. the aDDli~mr will be ;otified of the date and time of the Commissio-n meeting at which tile reconsiderari~n win be he:rrd. :3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. .All design and cons1ruction shaII be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. .fill engineer registered in the State ofldaho shall prepare and certify ail improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance wirh ail applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applic:mt to verify all existing utilities within the rightwof-way. Existing utilities damaged by the appiicmt shall be repaired by the applicant ar no cost to ACHD. The applicant snail be required to call DIGLINE (1-300-342-1585) at leasI two fuil business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-oi-way. The applie:mt shall canmet Silversrone.cmrn ~UI'h"-I "11" II of I~ Page 11 ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase or construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions oftlUs approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or "!he applicant's authorized representative and an authorized reuresentative of the Ada Countv Highwav District. The burden shall be unon the anolicant to obtain written confinnation or ~y change-from the Ada County Highway District. ". 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ail rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transporration system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Deveiopment Division at 387-6170. Submitted bv: Commission Action: Plannin~ and Develomnent Staff March 14. 2001 Silverstone.crnm E;tIz/6/.f.'lI" /J. t'J.p I/L Page 12 WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIGRAY, III BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON LARRY D. MOORE WILLIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS. CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHILIP A. PETERSON ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE.. 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680.1150 TEL (208) 268.2499 FAX (206) 286.2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653.0247 TEL (208) 466.9272 FAX (208) 466.4405 "ALSO ADMITTED IN OR nALSO ADMITTED IN WA PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE April 18,2001 ~MiliDrXNBctfir~L Clerk 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 City City Re: SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER - SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS ANNEXATION AND ZONING FINDINGS AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CASE NO. AZ-OI-OOI Dear Will: Please find enclosed a revised original of the Development Agreement for b;~h~~i~VCOe~~c~;~nature. This new revised agreement allows for 17 lots, which was approved Council did approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at their meeting held on April 17, 2001, the Findings will now need to be attached to the Development Agreement as Exhibit "B". Therefore, since the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit this revised Development Agreement, pertaining to the 17 lots, to the ownerldeveloper for signature. ~ Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\$ilverstone Corp Centr AZO] -00 1 PPO 1-00 I cUPO I. 002\BergRevisedDevAgmt04] 80 l.doc April 13, 2001 AZ 01-001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 17, 2001 APPLICANT Larson Architects ITEM NO. 3-M REQUEST Annexation and Zoning of 78 acres from R-l to C-C and C-G for proposed Silverstone Corporate Center -- southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached Findings rJvJ& tupf Contacted: Cornet Larson Date: 4/13/01 Phone: 376-4665 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of MeridIan. WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. OIORAY, III BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON LARRY D. MOORE WILLIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS. CHRISTOPHER S. N YE PHILIP A. PETERSON ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE.. 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288.2499 FAX (208) 288-2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466.4405 "ALSO ADMITTED IN OR nALSO ADMITTED IN WA PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE April 10, 2001 RECEIVED APR 1 2 2001 ~Mi{ID&lctft/ ~L Clerk 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Re: SILVERSTONE CORPORATE CENTER- SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS ANNEXATION AND ZONING FINDINGS AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CASE NO. AZ-OI-001 Dear Will: CONCLUSIO~~OF ri~ ANgoDefclmO~~DIO~~eG~I,fi~gSAP~il~~16N 16~ ANNEXATION AND ZONING prepared as fer instructions from the Council meeting of April 3, 2001, and which are on the agenda for Apri 1 7, 2001. I have also attached the original of the Development Agreement for owner/developer's signature. After the Council meeting of April 17, 2001, if Council afProves the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the above matter, then the Findings wil need to be attached to the four Development Agreements as Exhibit liB". Mter the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit the Development Agreement to the owner/developer for signature. v~:;;;y~ ?~~~ z:\ W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian [5360M\Silverstone Corp Centr AZO I-DO [ pro [-00 [CUPO [.002\FFCL and DevAgtClk.doc BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OR ASSIGNS, THE APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 78 ACRES FOR PROPOSED SILVERSTONE CORPORATION CENTER, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF OVERLAND AND EAGLE ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ClC 04-03-01 Case No. AZ-OI-OOI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on March 20, 2001, and continued until April 3, 200 I, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were Cornell Larson and Roger Anderson, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code ss 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code ss 11-15-5 and 11-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 I) Page 2 current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629, January 4,1994, and maps and the ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property which is the subject of the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full, 5. The property is approximately 78 acres in size and is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Eagle Road. The property is designated as Silverstone Corporate Center. 6. The owner of record of the subject property is the Sundance Investments Limited Partnership of Meridian, Idaho. 7. Applicant is owner of record. 8. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as R-1, and consists of vacant ground. 9. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as C-C and C-G. 10. The subject property is bordered to the north by two single family residences, a nursery and an ACHD Park and Ride Lot, open pasture and vacant parcels to the south, an 80-acre parcel with a single family dwelling to the east and agricultural land to the west. Thousand Springs Subdivision is to the southwest. The city limits of the City of Meridian are adjacent and abut the subject property. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW- AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 3 11. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 12. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: a 15 lot commercial subdivision. 14. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as C-C and C-G which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Mixed/Planned Use Development. 15. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. 16. The City Council recognizes the concerns of Sutherland Farm, Inc. dated February 5,2001, which request extension of Titanium Way and the addition of a collector street at the south end of the subject property. 17. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 I ) Page 4 Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 17.1 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 17.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9MI-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 17.3 Streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 17.4 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfilL 17.5 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 17.6 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 17.7 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. An operation and maintenance agreement for joint drainage FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 I ) Page 5 facilities shall be developed for inclusion in the CC&R's of the subdivision. 17.8 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance. 17.9 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 17.10 Provide five"foot-wide sidewalks throughout development in accordance with City Ordinance. 17.11 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 17.12 The applicant has submitted a list of proposed uses which, although not allowed for in the C"C or C-G zone in their entirety, may be allowed as part of a planned development. Some of the uses are not defined in Meridian's Zoning and Development Ordinance, while other uses listed may be prohibited outright in the Zoning Schedule of Use Control. The list appears a little too all-inclusive and needs further refinement. P&Z Commission and City Council carefully shall consider all proposed uses so an acceptable development agreement shall be drafted. The City Council requires that the following uses not be permitted outright, but require additional approval under the conditional use permit process: Sales Lots Automobile Repair Shop All drive"through/drive-up window establishments All child care facilities Communication towers Nursing Homes (this was listed as both a proposed use and a prohibited use by the applicant) Missions; Food Kitchens Private schools Shelter home FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 6 The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council requires that the following uses be included in the list of permitted uses: Electrical Supplies and Appliances Electronic Equipment and Products Greenhouses, Nurseries Hotels/Motels (these would likely require a variance to height regulations unless a height variance is specifically approved as part of this application; the applicant has requested a height of 50 feet to highest parapet) Molded Plastic Products Public Service Facilities Public and Quasi-public Uses Restaurants The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council further requires that all residential uses listed be strictly prohibited unless approved as a planned unit development under a separate conditional use process. 17.13 A Development Agreement shall be required as a condition of annexation. 18. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No. 17, and all sub~parts, the economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a condition of annexation and zoning designation. 19. It is also found that the development considerations as referenced in Finding No. 17 are reasonable to require and must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER;' (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors. 20. It is found that the zoning of the subject real property as Community Business District (C-C) and General Retail And Service Commercial District (C-G) requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems and will be compatible with the Applicant's development intentions, and will assure that the zoning is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Mixed/Planned Use Development. 21. The subject annexation request and zoning designation and proposed development relates and is compatible to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City as follows: 21.1 The consideration of the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the zoning ordinance assure that the processing of such application is the management of growth with the aim to achieve high- quality development. Enhancement of Meridian's quality of life for all residents is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to all applications such as the subject application. 21.2 This proposed new growth development will finance public service expansion by the requirement herein that the applicant comply with the requests submitted of the political subdivisions responses within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area submitted in the record of this FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) matter. 21.3 The application is consistent with Meridian's self identity. 21. 4 The preservation and improvement of the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a self-sufficient community is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application. 21.5 Compliance with the requests of the political subdivisions providing services, assures that community services are being provided for existing and projected needs and that the land use patterns of the City are balanced to insure that revenues pay for services and that the Urban Service Planning Area is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. 21.6 Compatible and efficient use ofland through innovative and functional site design is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application. 22. The property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Meridian City Code S 11-16 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-001) Page 9 policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of 'Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian, adopted December 21, 1993, Grd. No. 629,]anuary4, 1994.' 4. The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application: 4.A The Goals of the Comprehensive Plan are set forth at Page 5 and include: 4.1 To preserve Meridian's environmental quality and to make provisions for and improve the total natural environment by adopting City-wide and Urban Service Planning Area policies, which deal with area-specific policies and programs. 4.2 To ensure that gro'\Vth and development occur in an orderly fashion in accordance with adopted policies and procedures governing the use of land, residential development the provision of services and the distribution of new housing units within the Urban Service Planning Area. 4.3 To encourage the kind of economic gro'\Vth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services and its open space character. 4.4 To provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community. 4.5 To preserve and improve the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a self- FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 10 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) sufficient community. 4.6 To encourage cultural, educational and recreational facilities which will fill the needs and preferences of the citizens of Meridian and to insure that these facilities are available to all residents of the City. 4.7 To provide community services to fit existing and projected needs. 4.8 To establish compatible and efficient use ofland through the use of innovative and functional site design. 4.9 To encourage a balance ofland use patterns to insure that revenues pay for services. 4.10 To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. 4B. The sections of the Comprehensive Plan that most directly apply to the proposed project are as follows: 4.1 Goal 3 is "to encourage the land of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic selfMsufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." 4.2 Goal 5 is "to preserve and improve the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a self-sufficient community. " 4.3 Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." 4.4 Economic Development FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1) Page 11 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages ... . commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.2 It is the policy of the City of Meridian to set aside areas where commercial and industrial interest and activities are to dominate. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized 'With the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. 1.5 Strip industrial and commercial uses are not in compliance 'With the Comprehensive Plan. 2.2U Encourage and support job market expansion that provides for mid" and upper-range wage scale and benefits. Land Use 1,5U Encourage a balance of land uses to ensure that Meridian remains a desirable, stable and self-sufficient community. 1.6U Develop a land use review process that involves the public in the conceptual stage of a development proposal and utilizes staff expertise to address detailed standards. 1.1 au Promote the design of attractive roadway entryway areas into Meridian which will clearly identify the community. 1.11 UProtect citizen investments in existing public facilities (water, sewer, streets, fire, police) by encouraging controlled growth through city planning reviews and development agreements. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical-care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW- AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1) Page 12 shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 5.6 The development of a variety of compatible land uses should be provided in specific plans and proposals for future development. 5.10 Development should be conducted under Planned Unit Development procedures and as conditional uses, especially when two or more differing uses are proposed. 5.12 Strip development within this mixed-use area is not in compliance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 5.13 Clustering of uses and controlled access points along arterials and collector streets will be required. 5.14UBecause these areas are near 1-84, Franklin and Overland Roads, high-quality visual appearance is essential. All development proposals in this area will be subject to development review guidelines and conditional use permitting procedures. 5.15UThe mixed-use area in the vicinity of the Overland Road/Franklin Road/Eagle Road/I-84 interchange is a priority development area. Natural Resources and Hazardous Areas 3.1 U Manage and prevent unsuitable uses along drainageways and protect the floodplain of creeks and drains. 4.1 U Developments contiguous to natural waterways, irrigation canals, laterals and drainage ditches must consider all available information concerning floodplain waterways. Public Services, Utilities and Energy Resources FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 I ) Page 13 5.2 All new developments will be phased for connection to the municipal water system within the Urban Service Planning Area. 5 A Adequate water supply will be available for fire protection. 5.5 All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system. 5.8U Procure and develop additional water sources to ensure sufficient water supply for future residential and industrial demands. Transportation IAU Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.5U Encourage clustering of uses and controlled access points along arterial, collector and section line roads. 1.10URequire traffic studies evaluating the impact of generated traffic volwnes (internal and external circulation) on adjacent streets and to preserve the integrity of residential neighborhoods, as requested by the City. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 3.1 Establish a network of open space corridors that are either improved, semi-improved or unimproved which have the potential to enhance local identification within the area. Community DesiQ:n FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 I ) Page 14 1.3 Open space areas within all development should be encouraged. 1.4 Major entrances to the City should be enhanced and emphasized. Unattractive land uses along these entrances should be screened from view. 2.1 U Encourage area beautification through uniform sign design that enhances the community. 2.3U Encourage the beautification of streets, parldng lots, public lands, and state highways. 2.5U Encourage the use of attractive open space, landscaping, lighting and street furniture for the benefit of the public. 4.4U Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 5. The zonings of Conununity Business District (C~C) and General Retail And Service Commercial District (C-G) are defined in the Zoning Ordinance at S 11-7- 2 I and K as follows: (C-C) Community Business District: The purpose of the C-C District is to permit the establishment of general business uses that are of a larger scale than a neighborhood business, and to encourage the development of modem shopping centers with adequate off-street parldng facilities, and associated site amenities to serve area residents and employees; to prohibit strip commercial development and encourage the clustering of commercial enterprises. All such districts shall have direct access to a transportation arterial and collector and be connected to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP! SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 15 (C-G) General Retail And Service Commercial District: The purpose of the C-G District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely vvithin a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in dose proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel- related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development. 6. By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a conditional use permit is required for Applicant to construct and develop a possible mixed/planned unit development. 7. Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. See Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983). 8. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply vvith the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 12-2- 4 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13, which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems. 9. The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 10. Section 11-16-4 A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 16 part as follows: If property is annexed and zoned, the City may require or permit, as a condition of the zoning, that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or pennitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall take effect upon the adoption of the ordinance annexing and zoning the property, or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parceL Unless the commitment is modified or terminated by the City Council, the commitment shall be binding on the owner of the parcel, each subsequent owner, and each other person acquiring an interest in the property. A commitment is binding on the owner of the property even if it is unrecorded; however, an unrecorded commitment is binding on subsequent owners and each other person acquiring an interest in the property only if the subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the property has actual notice of the commitment. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of approximately 78 acres to Community Business District (C-C) and General Retail And Service Commercial District (C-G) is granted subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated. 2. The application is for annexation and zoning of 78 acres. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 17 Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686. 3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following conditions of development, to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 3.1 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 3.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3.3 Streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 3.4 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfill. 3.5 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 18 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER; (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) 3.6 Paving and striping shall be in accordance \Vith the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance \Vith Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 3.7 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. An operation and maintenance agreement for joint drainage facilities shall be developed for inclusion in the CC&R's of the subdivision. 3.8 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance. 3.9 All signage shall be in accordance \Vith the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 3.10 Provide five-foot-\Vide sidewalks throughout development in accordance with City Ordinance. 3.11 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the .A1nericans with Disabilities Act. 3.12 The applicant has submitted a list of proposed uses which, although not allowed for in the C-C or C-G zone in their entirety, may be allowed as part of a planned development. Some of the uses are not defined in Meridian's Zoning and Development Ordinance, while other uses listed may be prohibited outright in the Zoning Schedule of Use ControL The list appears a little too all-inclusive and needs further refinement. P&Z Commission and City Council carefully shall consider all proposed uses so an acceptable development agreement shall be drafted. The City Council requires that the following uses not be permitted outright, but require additional approval under the conditional use permit process: Sales Lots Automobile Repair Shop FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1) Page 19 All drive-through/drive-up window establishments All child care facilities Communication towers Nursing Homes (this was listed as both a proposed use and a prohibited use by the applicant) Missions; Food Kitchens Private schools Shelter home The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council requires that the following uses be included in the list of permitted uses: Electrical Supplies and Appliances Electronic Equipment and Products Greenhouses, Nurseries Hotels/Motels (these would likely require a variance to height regulations unless a height variance is specifically approved as part of this application; the applicant has requested a height of 50 feet to highest parapet) Molded Plastic Products Public Service Facilities Public and Quasi-public Uses Restaurants The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council further requires that all residential uses listed be strictly prohibited unless approved as a planned unit development under a separate conditional use process. 3.13 A Development Agreement shall be required as a condition of annexation. 4. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation of the real property which is the subject of the application to (C-C) COlmnercial Business District and (C-G) General Retail And Service Commercial, and Meridian City Code S 11-7-2 I and K. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) Page 20 5. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of this Order the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in Meridian City Code S 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the annexation and zoning ordinance. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the / 7,1;6 day of Ilr~' , 2001. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED~ COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED$C'- COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED tlbJ.g.,J- FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 21 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-00 1 ) COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) DATED: 4---/7 -tJ./ VOTED_ MOTION: /~ APPROVED:~ DISAPPROVED:_ Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. Bydl~ii4t~ City Clerk Dated: \\NPA NTS40 PDaSERVER Z\Work,\M\Meridian\Meridian 002\AZFfC]sO~der.doc - FINDINGS OF PACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY SUNDANCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP / SILVERSTONE CORP CENTER! (AZ-O 1-001) Page 22 WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GtoRAY, JI1 BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON LARRY D. MOORE WILlIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS. CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHILIP A. PETERSON BRIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE.. 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288.2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFlCE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653.0247 TEL (lOB) 466.9272 FAX (208) 466.4405 "ALSO ADMITTED IN OR nAlSO ADMITTED IN WA PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE April 19, 2001 William G. Berg, JI. City Clerk 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RECEIVED APR 6 200t City of Meridian City Clerk Office Re: BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. / WILIGNS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT (FP-OI-004) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Wm. F. Nichols Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian ] 5360M\Wilkins Ranch Village FPO] .004\C1erk04] 90] FP.doc BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 04/17/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC., FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR WILIGNS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ONE-HALF MILE WEST OF TEN MILE ROAD ON USTICK ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-01-004 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code ~ 12-3-7 on April 17, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bnlce Frecldeton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, listing 12 General Comments and 17 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the April 17, 2001 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and no one appeared in opposition, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR WILKINS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION (FP-O 1-004) - 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: I. The Plat ofllWILKINS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION" as evidenced in Plat bearing the "PLAT OF WILKINS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 3, T. 3N., R. 1W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2000, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. OF BOISE, IDAHO, SHEET I OF 2, STAMPED DATE OF NOV 09 2000 AND HANDWRITTEN DATE OF 10/20/00, #990412 \990412-PLT.DWG BKB 10/13/00, and STEINER DEVELOPMENT, L.L.c., DEVELOPER", is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freck1eton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated April 11, 2001, listing 12 General Comments and 17 Site Specific Comments, and the response letter from Steve Arnold on behalf of the Applicant dated April 17, 2001, true and correct copies are attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of six pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements as follows, to-wit: 1.1 Fire Chief, Kenny Bowers, requires that street name signs shall be installed before building is started. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT FOR WILIGNS RANCH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION (FP-01-004) -2 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed ancl/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on- site improvements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 176 day of /J;;rit ,2001. #\~.ln~miUflll ('~~.~:.~, . \ SEJ\I~ ~ ~~. t} l Copy served upon Ap~ : "">e . ~~d Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. "I'.I,((cift<?ou.vr'i. ".~,>"~ :tJ"1$,.'1t~tf:u>J; \ ~\ \ B~~~~/~ ity Clerk . < Dated: 1--/7-- () ( Z:\Work\lv1\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Wilkins Ranch Village FPOI-004\FPOrderOI .004.doc ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PIAT FOR WILKINS RANCH VILIAGE SUBDIVISION (FP-OI-004) -3 Mayor & City Council CITY OF MERIDIAN Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Enginee~ Shari Stiles. Planning & Zoning Administrator ~ Request for a Final Plat Approval of Willcins Ranch Village Subdivision - 48 Single- family Building Lots on 10.19 Acres in an R-8 Zone by Steiner Development (File# FP-Ol-OO4) /~~YOR / Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE r':4LLEY A Good Place to Live ( CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Kcith Bird Tarruny deWeerd Cherie ~.!cCandl= 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433, FA..'<:(20S) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42l8 MEMORANDUM: RECEIVED APR 1 1 2001 To: From: Re: LEGAL DEPART1vlENT (208)288-2499 . Fax 288-2501 P{;13LIC WORKS BUILDING DEPART1vlENT (208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297 PLANl'l1NG AND ZONING DEPARThlENT (208) 884-5533 . FA.."": 888-6854 April 11. 2001 We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: LOCATION The parcel is located one-half mile west ofTen:Mile Road on Ustick Road. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES This parcel is bordered on the east by Dakota Ridge Subdivision (R-4 subdivision) and a future elementary school site. Plat approval has been received for the property on the south and west for Wilkins Ranch Subdivision, an R-4 development with minimum lot sizes of 8.000 square feet. North of Us tick Roa~ from this property is unincorporated property zoned RT. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS I, Applicant is to meet all terms of the preliminary plat, development agreement, and conditional use permit for this project. 2. The developer shall place a deed restriction on Lots 8 and 10, Block 2, to prohibit the construction of any fencing higher than three feet on the sides adjacent to the pedestrian walkway lot. Provide a copy of the recorded deed restriction prior to obtaining building permits on those lots. This is particularly important in this case due to the fact that the walkway is angled. The developer will be responsible for constructing the three-foot-high fence and constructing the pedestrian walkway in accordance with City Ordinance. Removable bollards shall be installed. prior to applying for building permits. by the developer at each end of the pedestrian walkway to prevent vehicular traffic. 3. Revise or add the following notes: 8. ...1,0001...- 1.100 sf... FP-OI-O04 Wilkins Ranch Village Subdivision !;db.:/IIR. /~f" Mayor and Council April 11, 2001 Page 2 0' ....... ~ 'R r., ~.f.!t \.Q,: ...1,1001.- 1,200 sf... ...1,2001. - 1,300 sf... All other lots - 1,3001 sf minimum. 13, All lots within this subdivision are subject to the terms of a development agreement recorded as Instrument No. , records of Ada County. Idaho. 4. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via extensions from mains installed in the adjacent phases of Wilkins Ranch Subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 5. The developer shall be responsible for the payment of sewer and water assessment fees, as well as the actual physical cormection of the existing home that is located within the boundaries of this subdivision. 6. The landscape plan submitted with the application is not approved. Please resubmit a plan that has been prepared by a landscape architect, a qualified nurseryman, or landscape designer, with their name shown on the plan. Among the items that need to be changed on the plan are the inclusion of minimum two-inch caliper trees for every 35 linear feet of required street buffers, and the removal of trees that are shown within sight triangles. Bonding will be required for all landscaping prior to signature on the :final plat, and all landscaping must be complete prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. Also provide a detailed fencing plan for review and approval. The note included on the landscape plan is not sufficient for review of fencing. Fencing is not permitted within landscape buffers. 7. ClarifY the easements along the easterly boundary of Lots 11-17, Block 2. A 15-foot-wide easement is shown along the rear of these lots. What is the intent of this easement? Is there a separate ten-foot-wide easement for public utilities, irrigation and drainage beyond this easement? The Rutledge Lateral is also adjacent to these lots and does not appear to be piped. The minimum lot size for this development is 5,252 square feet, which minimum must be met exclusive of all irrigation easements unless the ditch is tiled. These lots will not meet the minimum size requirements unless the Rutledge Lateral is piped. Please clarify and modifY plat to conform. 8. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the landscape area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area 9. ~pplicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development IS to be owned and maintained by an association or the Narnpa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system., plans and specifications for the irrigation &IV",.I.J,:; ~fll I' eJ tJl , ,~ -mayor and Council April 11, 2001 Page 3 system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process, A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the :final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area 10. The soils investigation report submitted with the application indicates that groundwater was encountered at some fairly shallow depths within the project site. Design engineer to provide a statement of compliance, prior to the approval of development plans, that certifies that the centerline:finish grade of the streets, public or private, is at least three feet above the established normal ground water elevation. This is an effort to ensure that the building footings are at least one foot above the high groundwater. 11. No signage details were submitted (design or location). Staff recommends monument-type signage along Ustick Road. Detailed signage plans will be subject to design review and separate permits. 12. All utilities are to be underground throughout the entire site per Ordinance 12-6-7.D. 13. Execute the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgement. 14. Change the year of platting to 2001. 15. The bearing callout south of Lot 8, Block 2, doesn't match the legal description contained in the Certificate of Owners. Please modify. 16. Provide a blow-up detail of the pins located on the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 2. 17. Staffs failure to -cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved conditional use permit or preliminary pIat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation! drainage district. or lateral users association, with 'Written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. FP-OI-O04 Wilkins Ranch Village SubdivisiDn ~u"6:f "A" ~ ~ ~ Mayor and Council April II, 2001 Page 4 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty- and 1 DO-watt, high-pressure sodiwn streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and pennit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for any lots receiving engineered backfill. 5. Sewer and water mains shall be extended to and through the proposed development. 6. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifYing that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimwn of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 8. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment of mailbox structures. 9. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat Map to the Public Works Department for compliance review prior to development plan approval. 10. Submit the final letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names and lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 11. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. Fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. 12. Ifpossible, respond in writing to the each of the comments contained in this memorandum, by noon on Friday, April 13, 2001. Submit three copies of the revised final plat map with all corrections for conformance review prior to development plan approval. FP-Ol-O04 Wilkins Ranch ViIJage Subdivision GK,/,.1;:1 "A" 4f' tJl " BRIGGS ENGINEERlNQ,. Inc. ENGINEERS I PlANNERS I SURVEYORS 4-~ - t' t!/c 4-{7-0 I / 1800 West Overland Road Boise. Idaho 83705 - 3142 Voice {208} 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail briggs@micron.net April 17, 2001 Ms Shari Stiles NIr. Bruce Freckleton City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 201 Merid~ Idaho 83642 RECEIVED APR 1 7 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Re: Wilkins Ranch Village Final Plat Approval. Dear Shari and Bruce: This letter is in response to staff comments dated April 11, 2001, and received April 17, 2001 (4:00pm). SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS: L The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The plat has been modified accordingly. 4. The applicant will comply, 5. The applicant will comply. 6. The landscape pIan that the planning staffhas reviewed is not the most current landscape pIan that was prepared by a licensed landscape architect. That plan was submitted to the City in early February. We believe the submitted landscape plan complies with the requirement but if it needs to be modified to comply we make the necessary changes. 7. There is an existing irrigation pipe along the east property line located within a 5-foot wide easement. The plat will include an additional lO-foot wide easement for public utilities, irrigation and drainage because a ten foot wide easement was not sufficient. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The pressurized irrigation system will be owned, maintained, and built to Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The applicant will provide a secondary source other than the culinary water system. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant understands. 12. The applicant will comply. 13. The applicant will comply. 14. The applicant will comply. 15. The applicant will comply, 16. The applicant will comply. 5d.'6.Y "/1" SO"" 990412/Wilkins Village F inaI Plat Response Itr ~:J;'GGS ENGINEE~'NG. Inc. 1 ROO W (}vp.r!and Rn::!rl- Rnise lrl::!hn R~705 _ "OR' ~44-~700 {' / t ~, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will comply. 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant will comply. 12. The applicant cannot comply. Unfortunately I just received these comments at 4:00pm the day ofthe hearing. I have read through the report and do not see any problems with neither the SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS nor the GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. Based on our compliance with the conditions we respectively request approval of the :final plat for Willdns Village Subdivision. If you require additional information I will provide it immediately. Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERJ]\J'G, Inc. Steve Arnold Project Manager/Land Use Planner EUu'!J,'1 j&/"" aPt, 0101 \Cit)Mer Hawkins-Clark Response.ltr interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, IrX' APR 1 2 Wm. F. NiChO}!;:l(f1 City of Meridian SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION BY G.L. VOIGT<tit:v~~O~~~~; / PP-00-020 From: Subject: Date: Apri19,2001 Will: Pursuant to City Council's action at their April 3, 2001 meeting, pertaining to the Annexation and Zoning application by G. 1. Voigt Development for the proposed Sundance Subdivision, and Council's denial thereof, please find attached the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT in Sundance Subdivision. This may be presented to the Mayor to obtain his signature only after the City Council takes action adopting the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order of Denial in Case No. AZ-OO-021. Mter you have executed the Findings please present copies to the Applicant, Planning and Zoning, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you have any questions please advise. l:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360M\Sundance Sub Al02l PP020\ClerkDeniaIPP.doc April 13. 2001 PP 00-020 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT G. L. Voigt Development April 1 7, 2001 ITEM NO. s-I REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision -- northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads AGENCY COMMENTS CJTY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DE?T: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DE?T: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFJCE: ADA COUNTY HJGHW A Y DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached Findings ~ cvP p'(D Contacted: Steve Arnold, Briggs Engineering Date: 4/13/01 Phone: 344~9700 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUNDANCE ) SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE) NORTHEAST CORNER OF ) USTICK ROAD AND MERIDIAN ) ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT, APPLICANT. C/C 04/03/01 Case No. PP~OO-020 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on March 20, 2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council takes judicial notice of its action of the denial of the application for annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-00-021, and the hearing was opened on the preliminary plat application and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were: Steve Arnold and Becky Bowcutt, and the City Council based upon its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order in Case No, AZ-00-021 does FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-OO-020) - 1 hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approvaL FINDINGS OF FACT 1. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is not reasonable nor appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat due to the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-OO-021. DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code Section 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER, that based upon the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-OO-021, the Council does hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approvaL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-OO-020) - 2 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 171!:;ray of IJpUL , 2001. BY:~4;ffl. ~ RT D. CORRIE Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Warks Department and City Attorney. ByJb/~P Bet. 9-. Dated City Clerk .F 1- /1- Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Sundance Sub AZ02 I PP020\FFCLOrdDenyPP.doc FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-OO-020) - 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 04/17/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO.6, LOCATED AT USTICK AND LINDER ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-OI-003 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code 8- 12-3-7 on April 17, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, listing 9 General Comments and 13 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the April 17,2001 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and no one appeared in opposition, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION (FP-01-003) - 1 1. The Plat of "TUMBLE CREEK NO.6 SUBDIVISION" as evidenced in Plat bearing the "PLAT SHOWING TUMBLE CREEK NO.6 SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 & 2 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2001, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC. OF BOISE, IDAHO, SHEET 1 OF 2, FILE NAME: P:\A_CIVIL\C006251\dwg\C00625I_FP, HANDWRITTEN DATE OF: 30 JAN 2001, and STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO., DEVELOPER", is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated April II, 2001, listing 9 General Comments and 13 Site Specific Comments, and the response letter from Clint Boyle on behalf of the Applicant dated April 13, 200 I, true and correct copies are attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements as follows, to-wit: 1.1 Fire Chief, Kenny Bowers, requires that street name signs shall be installed before building is started. All cornman lots shall be kept clear of trash and weeds. 1.2 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION (FP-OI-003) w2 Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided then, Applicant shall furnish to the Public Works Department a copy of the proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule of regular maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. The engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1.3.1 State of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 1.3.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION (FP-O 1-003) - 3 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off~site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on- site improvements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /7rf!:. day of +/7 ,2001. ~YD~, ~ YOR ROBERT D. CORRIE Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. BJdtc--)~C) City Clerk Dated: Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Tumble Creek Subdivision 5 FP029\FPOrderOl.003.doc ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION (FP-O 1-003) - 4 WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GlORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIGRAY, III BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON LARRY D. MOORE WILLIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS. CHRISTOPHER S. NVE PHILJP A. PETERSON ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVtD M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE" 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 3] POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERlDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208} 286.2499 FAX (208) 288.2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653.0247 TEL [208) 466.927Z FAX (208) 466.4405 'ALSO ADMITTED IN OR "ALSO ADMITTED IN WA PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE April 19, 2001 William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 20m Citv of MBXidian City Clerk Office Re: PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., I TUMBLE CREEK SUBDNISION NO.6 FINAL PLAT (FP-OI-003) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. v"-:~ Wm. F. Nichols Z:\Work\M\lVleridian\Meridian I 5360M\TumbJe Creek Subdivision 5 FP029\Clerk04190 I FP.doc MAYOR Robert D. Corri~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tanuny dcWcerd Cherie McCandless CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433. FA-'\: (208) 8874813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: RECEIVED APR 1 1 200i Mayor & City Council CITY OF MERIDIAN Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Enginee~ Shari Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator ~ MEMORANDUM: From: LEGAL DEPARTr...1ENT (208) 288-2499 . Fax 288-250 1 PUBLIC WORKS BlJ1LDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887.2211 . Fa>: 887.1297 PLAJ'lNING AND ZONING DEPARH-!E!'i"T (208) 884-5533 . FA..'\: 888-6854 April!1,2001 Re: Request for a Final Plat Approval of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 - 31 Single- family Building Lots on 8.04 Acres in an R-4 Zone by Stubblefield Construction Company (File# FP-Ol-003) We bave reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: LOCATION The property is generally located on the south side of Ustick Road and west of Linder Road. It is designated as Single-family Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North - Phase 5 of Tumble Creek Subdivision. South - Turtle Creek Subdivision. East - Phase 2 of Tumble Creek Subdivision. West - (Across Linder Road) Land Zoned RUT in Ada County, Idaho. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat. 2. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 3. Revise the following notes: 9. ..,subject to the regulations of Chapter +G ll. Meridian Zoning Ordinance. The FP..Q!..Q03 Tumble Creek No.6 Subdivision b'U,Ch:ll# A.' I eJ I' &/ / Mayor and Council April 11, 2001 Page 2 Planning and De. elSflment Sen iC0s Zoninl! Department... n. .. . unless specifically allowed by the Highway District and Beise-City the City of Meridi~ 4. Water and sanitary sewer service to this site is proposed via extensions from adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 5. A variance was granted on January 16, 2001, by the Meridian City Council for Lots 18-21, Block 9. The variance was for 2!!!Y those four lots, and was for frontage only. The 8,000- square-foot minimum lot size still applies. Lot 25, Block 1, does not meet the minimum frontage requirement of 80 feet and cannot be approved in this configuration. Modify plat to conform to the 80-foot minimum frontage requirement. Provide lot closure information for all lots to verify minimum lot square footages of 8,000 square feet. 6. The developer, as a condition of the plat must construct a 20-foot wide minimum landscape buffer, beyond the required ACHD right-of-way along Linder Road. The landscaping and fencing plan dated 12/11/00 is approve~ with the exception that the Indian Summer Crab and Gallery Pear trees must be a minimum two-inch caliper. No other changes to the landscape plan are permitted without prior written approval of the Planning & Zoning Department. Fencing shall not encroach upon this buffer. Fencing adjacent to the entry may not exceed a height of three feet within 20 feet of the right-of-way. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the landscaping and fencing improvements prior to City signature on the Final Plat. Fencing is to be constructed prior to applying for building permits. All landscaping is to be complete prior to obtaining Certificates of Occupancy. 7. Indicate on the fmal plat map any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the area being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. Any structures proposed within the lOO-year floodplain will require approval through the conditional use permit process. 8. Place an arrow symbol on Lot 13, Block 1, toward N. Blue Springs Avenue; and on Lot 17, Block 16, toward N. Rough Stone Way. These lots only meet frontage requirements with a specific orientation. Add the arrow symbol to the legend of symbols. 9. Execute the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgement. 10. Graphically depict lO-foot-wide public utilities, irrigation and drainage easements across all rear lot lines. 11. The application submitted indicates that the City well lot is included on the plat; however, it is not. The parcel has already been deeded to the City. In order to clear up the illegal split, include the City's well lot within the boundaries of the plat and add the City of Meridian as a signator to the plat. It should be clearly noted on the plat that this is a lot that is o\Wed by the FP~I~03 Tumble Creek No.6 Subdivision ;;-~"P. T "fJ" .2()I'~ City of Meridian for a domestic well. Landscaping and maintenance of the lot will be the responsibility of the developer. Mayor and Council April 11, 2001 Page 3 12. Please submit a written response to all of these comments by noon on Friday, April 13. Submit the letter to the Meridian City Clerk's office. 13. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty- and 1 DO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and pemrit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfill. 5. Sewer and water mains shall be extended to and through the proposed development. 6. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifYing that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established nonna! groundwater elevation. 7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City ofMeridianfs Water Works Superintendent. 8. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment of mailbox structures. 9. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat Map to the Public Works Department for compliance review prior to development plan approval. FNlI~03 Tumble Creek NQ. 6 Subdivision ElJ(,i/~, r "/'1" ~ ~P'l ( PINNACLE =- -= Engineers, Inc. RECEIVED APR I J 20m \\ City Df Meridian City Clerk Office April L3; 2001 Meridian Mayor & City Council 33 EastIdaho St. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Final Plat Application for Tumble Creek Subdivision No.6 Dear Mayor & City Council: We are in rece; pt of the Meridian City Memorandum dated April I I, 200 I related to the Final Plat Approval ofTumhle Creek Subdivision No.6. On hehalf ofStuhhlefield Development Company, we are submitting the following comments regarding this [mal plat application: · Memo Item # 5 (regarding the variance, fronlage, and lot closures) _ A revised pIal was submitted on April 10, 2001 to incorponite the requested changes. Lot 25, Diock 1 was modified to meet the 80-ft. frontage requirement. Lot closure tables. indicating minimum lot sizes of 8,000 sq.ft. were provided for aHlots. · .The developer and applicant agree to comply witll the requested conditions inclUding Site Specific Comments 1-13 and General Requirements 1-9. If you have any questions nr lleed additional information please COlllact me at 208-887.7760 or via email atcIintb@pinnacle-enginecrs.com. Sincerely, ~J?Z-- Clint Boyle Land Use Planner cc: Shari Stiles, Meridian City Planning Department John Stubblefield, Stubblefield Development File #C016005 12551 W EXECUTIVE DRIVE. SUITE B . BorSE, IDAHO 83713 . (208) 887-7760 . FAX (lOB) 887-7781 C01~OC' Final PIal statf ~ommelll "'.pallle liT 04 un I.doc l'age J of t APR 13 '01 15: 35 bU,bI' "/11# ~iJ11/h BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 04~03~O I IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING RESIDENCE INTO AN OFFICE, LOCATED IN AN L-O ZONE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. CUP-OI-OOI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING I JOHNSON DESIGN APPLICANT FOR: O'NEILL HOMES, L.L.C. APPLICANT The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Scott Beecham, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - I makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to- wit: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the March 20, 2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code ~6 7 -6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code ss 11-15-5 and 11-17- 5 as evidenced by the Mfidavit of Mailing, and the Mfidavit of Publication and Proof FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2 of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. This proposed development request is in an L~O zone and by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code s 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. 4. The property is located at 385 S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is O'Neill Homes, LLC of Boise, Idaho. 6. Applicant is owner of record. 7. The subject property is currently zoned L-O. The zoning district of L-O is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2 G. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for conversion of an existing residence into an office. The L-O zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance does not normally require a conditional use permit be obtained for this type of use. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). However, a previous development agreement required developers to go through the conditional use permit process for the property. 9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 3 10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. II. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles II and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 12. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 12.1 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is not available to the subject site at this time. The existing sewer septic system and domestic well shall be utilized. Approval of this application needs to be subject to the requirement that sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to and through this parcel with any future development on the parcel, or after a period of six-years, which ever comes first. Applicant to coordinate FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 4 routing and placement of lines with Public Works Department. 12.2 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. 12.3 Applicant has stated the only sigtlage they intend for the office building will be limited to on-building signs. No freestanding signs are proposed. If, in the future, any freestanding signs are proposed, they shall conform to the new sign ordinance, as follows: maximum height = 8 feet, maximum background area = 50 square feet. 12.4 The required number of parking stalls appears to be met by the plan. The structure is 1632 s.f. Office uses require one space per 400 sJ. This shall require four parking spaces. The handicap parking space width does not meet ADA standards for a van-accessible space. This space shall be increased to a total width of 16 feet (8-foot stall plus 8- foot aisle). The aisle shall be striped separately from the stall and van- accessible sigtlage shall be installed. 12.5 The undeveloped portion of the lot shall be mowed and kept free of weeds greater than 8" tall. 12.6 The Commission/Council concur with the submitted landscape plan as meeting the intent of the Landscape Ordinance with one modification: the trees along the south property line need to continue along the driveway out to Locust Grove, with one tree per 35 l.f. The plan approval is based on the following findings: A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along Locust Grove, beyond right-of-way, with one tree per 35 l.f. A 20-foot wide buffer screen (60% solid) is required adjacent to the residential lot north of the subject property. The double row of trees provided along the north side of the parking lot meets this requirement. The south property line is required to have the 5-foot perimeter buffer adjacent to the driveway and parking areas, with one tree per 35 l.f. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 5 12.7 The landscape treatment of the ground plane is not specified on the proposed plan. All required landscape areas shall be vegetated with grass, shrubs, or other vegetative groundcover. 12.8 ACHD is requiring the dedication of 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road. However, the Site Plan currently shows only 25 feet from centerline to edge of landscape buffer. The 25- foot wide street buffer is required beyond the 48 feet of right-of-way dedication. 12.9 Applicant shall submit a modified site/landscape plan with the submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, showing the additional trees, correct right-of-way, ground plane landscaping, handicap parldng striping and signage, and full planting schedule. 12.10 In accordance with City Ordinance 12-13-8-1, underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant shall submit irrigation performance specifications in compliance with Ordinance 12-13-8-2 when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 12.11 All required improvements shall be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid shall accompany any request for Temporary Occupancy. 12.12 Off-street parldng shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 12.13 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13A.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 12.14 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parldng areas. All site drainage shall FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6 be contained and disposed of on-site. 12.15 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4. C. 12.16 Applicant shall provide a minimum of one (1) two-inch (2") caliper tree per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt area on the site in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.B.3.c. 12.17 All trash and/or garbage collection areas shall be enclosed on at least three (3) sides in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-12-1.C. Coordinate trash enclosure locations and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company (SSC) and provide a letter of approval from SSC to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to applying for building permits. 12.18 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 12.19 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 12.20 In accordance with City Ordinance 11-13-4.B.2., underground year- round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 12.21 Applicant shall pave the driveways to their full-required width to a point beyond the edge of pavement abutting Locust Grove Road. 12.22 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 12.23 Applicant shall dedicate 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 7 12.24 Applicant shall provide a $2,890 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at the District for the required street improvements of approximately 149 feet of curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 12.25 The building appears to be on a septic system. An accessory use application shall be made with CDHD to determine whether or not septic system is adequate for proposed use. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 12.26 An acknowledgment letter from the Fire Chief, evidencing that fire hydrants shall only be installed upon further development. A fire hydrant shall be installed upon further development of the property, or after a period of six-years, whichever comes first. 12.27 An adequate turnaround area shall be constructed. This turnaround shall utilize the planned driveway and drive aisles as proposed on the submitted site plan. 12.28 Any further development shall require a conditional use permit. 12.29 All driveways and required parldng areas shall be paved in accordance with Section 11-13-4.D, unless otherwise restricted. The area in front of (to the east of) the detached two car garage shall be maintained in gravel per the requirements of the Central District Health Department. This area shall be subject to paving at the time of connection to sanitary sewer. 13. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 8 13.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as "Single-Family Residential". 14. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 17. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 18. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 9 "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. 967-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67.6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed vvith conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances. 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential shovving supports the finding that the follovving standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code S 11.17. 3) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious vvith and in accordance vvith the Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance; c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance vvith the existing or intended character of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 10 the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a Limited Office District (L-O), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code ~ 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Pertuit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission." 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 11 the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code 9 11-17-6) 7, When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; B, Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained property; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21,1993, Ord. 629, January 4,1994 and Maps. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 12 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: 1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for the conversion of an existing residence into an office in an LwO zone at 385 S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is not available to the subject site at this time. The existing sewer septic system and domestic well shall be utilized. Approval of this application needs to be subject to the requirement that sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to and through this parcel with any future development on the parcel, or after a period of six-years, which ever comes first. Applicant to coordinate routing and placement of lines with Public Works Department. 1.2 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. 1.3 Applicant has stated the only signage they intend for the office building will be limited to on-building signs. No freestanding signs are proposed. If, in the future, any freestanding signs are proposed, they shall conform to the new sign ordinance, as follows: maximum height = 8 feet, maximum background area = 50 square feet. 1.4 The required number of parking stalls appears to be met by the plan. The structure is 1632 s.f. Office uses require one space per 400 sJ. This shall require four parldng spaces. The handicap parldng space width does not meet ADA standards for a van-accessible space. This FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 13 space shall be increased to a total width of 16 feet (8-foot stall plus 8- foot aisle). The aisle shall be striped separately from the stall and van- accessible signage shall be installed. 1.5 The undeveloped portion of the lot shall be mowed and kept free of weeds greater than 8" tall. 1.6 The Commission/Council concur with the submitted landscape plan as meeting the intent of the Landscape Ordinance with one modification: the trees along the south property line need to continue along the driveway out to Locust Grove, with one tree per 35 Lf. The plan approval is based on the following findings: A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along Locust Grove, beyond right-of-way, with one tree per 35 1.f. A 20-foot wide buffer screen (60% solid) is required adjacent to the residential lot north of the subject property. The double row of trees provided along the north side of the parking lot meets this requirement. The south property line is required to have the 5-foot perimeter buffer adjacent to the driveway and parking areas, with one tree per 35 Lf. 1.7 The landscape treatment of the ground plane is not specified on the proposed plan. All required landscape areas shall be vegetated with grass, shrubs, or other vegetative groundcover. 1.8 ACHD is requiring the dedication of 48 feet. of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road. However, the Site Plan currently shows only 25 feet from centerline to edge of landscape buffer. The 25- foot wide street buffer is required beyond the 48 feet of right-of-way dedication. 1.9 Applicant shall submit a modified site/landscape plan with the submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, showing the additional trees, correct right-of-way, ground plane landscaping, handicap parking striping and signage, and full planting schedule. 1.10 In accordance with City Ordinance 12-13-8-1, underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 14 Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant shall submit irrigation performance specifications in compliance with Ordinance 12-13-8-2 when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 1.11 All required improvements shall be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid shall accompany any request for Temporary Occupancy. 1.12 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 1.13 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections ll-I3-4.D. and 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.14 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 1.15 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 1.16 Applicant shall provide a minimum of one (I) two-inch (2") caliper tree per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt area on the site in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.B.3.c. 1.17 All trash and/or garbage collection areas shall be enclosed on at least three (3) sides in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-12-1. C. Coordinate trash enclosure locations and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company (SSC) and provide a letter of approval from SSC to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to applying for building permits. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 15 1.18 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 1.19 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1.20 In accordance with City Ordinance 11-13-4.B.2., underground year- round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows; 1.21 Applicant shall pave the driveways to their full-required width to a point beyond the edge of pavement abutting Locust Grove Road. 1.22 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 1.23 Applicant shall dedicate 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed. 1.24 Applicant shall provide a $2,890 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at the District for the required street improvements of approximately 149 feet of curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 1.25 The building appears to be on a septic system. An accessory use application shall be made with CDHD to determine whether or not septic system is adequate for proposed use. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 1.26 .An acknowledgment letter from the Fire Chief, evidencing that fire hydrants shall only be installed upon further development. A fire FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 16 hydrant shall be installed upon further development of the property, or after a period of six-years, whichever comes first. 1.27 An adequate turnaround area shall be constructed. This turnaround shall utilize the planned driveway and drive aisles as proposed on the submitted site plan. 1.28 Any further development shall require a conditional use permit. 1.29 All driveways and required parking areas shall be paved in accordance with Section 11-13-4.0, unless otherwise restricted. The area in front of (to the east of) the detached two car garage shall be maintained in gravel per the requirements of the Central District Health Department. This area shall be subject to paving at the time of connection to sanitary sewer. 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City Code S 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 17 NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code & 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of ~ ,200l. ROLLCALL: /7~ COUNCILlvlAN RON ANDERSON VOTED~'- VOTED $tL--- COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED to,j d~./- COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED~ MAYOR R~ERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) DATED: . -/1-1J/ VOTED_ MOTION: APPROVED:~ DISAPPROVED:_ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 18 By:c::/I;j/~ ~ ~r; City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Warks Department and the City Attorney. \\\\'lt~llm~llirtf111 ~~~':~-( Of ~~~:y/"&~~ 10 .......- ,..&?OJr...I?; ~ ~.. it ;$V (:'0 :.r. Dated: 4--17~1J/; 1 l 7~ . />) ~ ;.\ ~ '4sr is'{ .... ~,f:.l ~ -, Ck.. ~~ . () "t- -:$' '4~~~;..,~\y)~ \\NPA_NTS40 ]DC\SERVER_Z\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\O'Neill Homes CUPO 1 ~OO I \FfClsCUPO 100 l.doc FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 19 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 04/03/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LOCUST GROVE PLACE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE AND SOUTH OFFAlRVIEW AVENUE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. PP-OI-002 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT BY: LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC, L.C. DEVELOPMENT,INC., OWENRS/DEVELOPER The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on April 3,2001, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were Anna Powell and Lee Centers, and appearing with comments and/or concerns was Richard Livingston, and the City Council having received a report from Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and the City Council having received as part of the record of this matter the recommendation to City Council ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having submitted the "PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLAT, LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS & LOCUST GROVE PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAN VIEW, A PORTION OF THE NE 'l4 OF THE NE 14 8.7. T.3N., R.IE., BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN CITY, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, DATE: 12-21-2000, DRAWN BY: D.A. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE / (PP-OI-002) CRAWFORD, CHECKED BY: ID.CANNING, SHEET NO.: C1.0, E: \- JOBFILE\CC08\CC08SURV.DWG Fri Dec 2209: 05: 38 2000, B & A ENGINEERS, INC., ENGINEERS, AND LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC, AND L.C. DEVELOPMENT, INC., DEVELOPERS", submitted for preliminary plat approval and which preliminary plat for approval application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code S 12-3-3. Therefore the City Council makes the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by reason ofthe fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive Plan and Map, adopted December 21, 1993, and the property is presently zoned High Density Residential District (R-40) and Community Business District (C-C), and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System. [Meridian City Code S 11-7-2 F and 1.] 2. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629. 3. It is detelmined that Urban Services can be made available to accommodate the proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements and conditions hereinafter set forth as conditions of preliminary plat approval. 4. The proposed development is a continuity ofthe proposed development within the City's Capital Improvement Program and if the conditions which are requested by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the Assistant City Engineer and as proposed by the developer as stated on the preliminary plat there will be public financial capability of supporting services for FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-OI-002) - 2 the proposed development. 5. The development if built in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will not create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such concerns brought to the Council's attention. 6. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as hereinafter set forth. 7. The applicant has submitted for consideration ofthis approval drawing of the preliminary plat herein designated as: "PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLAT, LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS & LOCUST GROVE PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAN VIEW, A PORTION OF THE NE 14 OF THE NE 14 S.7. T.3N., R1E., BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN CITY, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, DATE: l2-21-2000~ DRAWN BY: D.A. CRAWFORD, CHECKED BY: I.D.CANNING, SHEET NO.: Cl.O, E: \-IOBFILE\CC08\CC08SURV.DWG Fri Dee 2209: 05: 382000, B & A ENGINEERS, INC., ENGINEERS, AND LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC, AND LC. DEVELOPMENT, INC., DEVELOPERS". DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code S 12- 3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER 1. The Preliminary Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLAT, LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS & LOCUST GROVE PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAN VIEW, A PORTION OF THE NE 14 OF THE NE 14 S.7. T.3N., RIB., BOISE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-OI-002) - 3 MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN CITY, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, DATE: 12-21-2000, DRAWN BY: D.A. CRAWFORD, CHECKED BY: ID.CANNING, SHEET NO.: CLO, E: \- IOBFILE\CC08\CC08SURV.DWG Fri Dec 22 09: 05: 382000, B & A ENGINEERS, INC., ENGINEERS, AND LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC, AND L.c. DEVE.LOPMENT, INC., DEVELOPERS" is hereby conditionally approved; and 2. The conditions of approval are as follows to-wit: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Engineering Technician III Recommendations as follows: 2.1 Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2.2 Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 2.3 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. This development shall be subject to applicable Latecomers fees. Latecomer fees shall be due and payable prior to signature on the final plat. 2.4 Sanitary sewer service to this site is proposed via extensions from existing mains in Stonehenge Way and Scrivner Avenue. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2.5 Water service to this site shall be via extensions from extensions of an existing mains in Stonehenge Way, Scrivner Avenue, and Locust Grove. Applicant shall be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains shall be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 2.6 Two-hundred-fifty and IOO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-0l-002) - 4 2.7 Underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size oflandscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains shall not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 2.8 Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual shall be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 2.9 Ordinance I2-4-8.B. states, "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision." 2.10 The City Council requires approval of the proposed design tiling the Settlers Canal and leaving the Jackson Drain untiled, with a pathway along the north side ofthe property that must match the pathway constructed in the Penn Station project. The proposed path shall be concrete or asphalt to match the rest of the pathway. The property owner to the east of Locust Grove shall work to continue the path extension when the property is developed. Due to the high-density proposed use, safety may be a concern ofthe Settlers Irrigation District and the City of Meridian along the Settlers Canal if no fencing is proposed. The City Council further requires that the pathway be paved after it is deeded to the city, and that the city accept the pathway and maintain it, before construction of the pathway by the developer. 2.11 The pathway is proposed to connect with the sidewalk in front of the commercial building on Lot 8, Block I instead of continuing along the drain and connecting with the Locust Grove Road sidewalk. The City Council further requires that the sidewalk shall go all the way to Locust Grove's meandering sidewalk and be put in by the developer. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-OI-002) - 5 2.12 The Comprehensive Plan designates Locust Grove as a minor arterial. As such, the landscape buffer shall be a minimum of 25-feet in width beyond the required ACHD right-of-way (as shown) and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement beyond the future right-of-way designated as such on the plat. No landscape easement is currently shown. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping on each lot shall be dealt with on a site by site review basis as part ofthe Certificate of Zoning Compliance and building permit process but shall be planted in substantial compliance with the CUP landscape plan as approved by Council. 2.13 Detailed landscape plans for the Locust Grove landscape buffer and the six (6) required planting strips shall be submitted for review and approval with the Final Plat application. A letter of credit or cash surety shall be required for the improvements prior to City signature on the Final Plat. 2.14 Six-foot-high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required, except where the City has agreed in writing that such fencing is not necessary. Applicant must submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal ofthe Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 2.15 In her 2-21-01 fax to Brad Hawkins-Clark, Anna Powell states that ACHD's preference is to make the entrance road a private drive instead of a public right-of- way. This is a modification to ACHD's report. The R-40 zone does not have a minimum lot frontage requirement, so a private entry drive shall still allow Lot 6 to meet ordinance. However, if the entry drive is incorporated into the common parking/circulation lots and these lots are controlled by a separate business owner=s association, it could present a potential land-locked parcel for the apartments, giving the business owner's power to restrict access to the apartments. No CC&R's were submitted to clarify the working relationship between the apartment residents and the business owners. The City Council requires that Lot 6 be designed either as a flag lot to provide direct frontage on Locust Grove or that the plat designate the entty drive as a permanent ingress/egress easement in favor of Lot 6. 2.16 On page 5 of their Staffreport, ACHD made three (3) special recommendations to the City of Meridian. The City Council supports these recommendations, including providing sufficient pedestrian access between Danbury Fair Subdivision and the subject plat via the Scrivner Avenue stub. The pedestrian walkway shall a minimum width of 10- feet and be constructed of hard surface. The City Council further requires that the sidewalk shall go all the way to Locust Grove's meandering sidewalk to be put in by the developer. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-OI-002) - 6 2.17 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 2.18 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 2.19 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality, or if other means of pretreatment of storm water discharge is provided, then Applicant shall furnish to the Public Works Department a copy ofthe proposed Operation and Maintenance Manual, including a schedule ofregu]ar maintenance for the drains. A commitment shall be required that in the event the drains do not effectively work, either through problems with design or maintenance, development of new plans for a means to pretreat the storm water discharge shall be required. 2.20 The Engineers and architects involved with the design ofthe subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations from the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District as follows: 2.21 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Jackson Drain courses along the north boundary ofthe above-mentioned proposed project. Any encroachment within the easement of the Jackson Drain without written approval is unacceptable. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 2.22 Streets and street name signs shall be built and installed before building is started. The proj ect needs a second access for ingress and egress. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Sanitary Services as follows: 2.23 Meet the waste enclosure locations and placements for the commercial retail complex and apartment complex. The complex north of Bradley is adequate but south of Bradley needs to be reviewed. Adopt the Recommendations of the ACHD as follows: 2.24 Applicant shall comply with ACHD requirements, and which requirements are attached as Exhibit "A" and dated March 1,2001, and consisting offourteen (14) pages. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-0l-002) - 7 ~t By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~day of 0VVl a AY ,2001. ROLLCALL COUNCILMAN ANDERSON VOTED~ VOTED~ COUNCILMAN BIRD COUNCILWOMAN deWEERD VOTED~ COUNCIL WOMAN McCANDLESS VOTED~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE VOTED-=-- (TIE BREAKE~ fttpvove,ol ~: () Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. ByJf~.b~,9- City Clerk Dated: I'--b-O Z- Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian !5360M\Locust Grove Place AZ PP CUP\FfCls0rdPP.doc FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCUST GROVE PLACE (PP-Ol-002) - 8 <!';~ ,~~~.~ . 4f.~~ ACHD '~,. I~ Ada County Highway District Judy Peavey-Derr, President Dave Bivens, 1 st Vice President Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President Susan S. Easllake, CommiSSioner David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner 318 East 37th Street Garden City 10 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail: lellus@ACHD.adajd.us March 1, 2001 RECEIVED MAR - 5 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN TO: Locust Grove Apartment LLC P.O. Box 518 Meridian, Idaho 83680 FROM: Christy Richardson, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development (!. ~ SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Locust Grove Place Locust Grove Road, sfo Fariview Avenue On February 28, 2001, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approvaJ by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the folJowing shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three compJete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority toqether with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. [,tY0-~t it pCL~ ! of )~ 4. If Public Right-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two-weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services-City of Meridian Construction Services - John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi B & A Engineering 5505 W. Franklin Road Boise, Idaho 83705 .E;>dv~v~'t A - Pelot?-- of )L\- ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat - Locust Grove Place/MPPO 1-002 MAZOI-002/MCUPO 1-003 Locust Grove Road s/o Fairview Avenue This application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Locust Grove Place is a I80-unit multi-family and commercia] subdivision on 11.8-acres. The site is located on the west side of Locust Grove Road approximately ~ - mile south ofFairview Avenue. This development is estimated to generate 1,6 10 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: )1 ~-I ~ -"""" b!~ "UJr ..- $= l::: -- r~" ._ c.r L ~ .~~~~:? =c; ::.::"J:J, .-L i ,),~<~;~~ [' '1"' --~- ~,~ [U~If ::::Hi Locust Grove Road Fairview Avenue Pine Street ACHD Commission Date - February 28, 200] - 6:30 p.m. Hill ,_ ~ JI! HII fL-11 ~ Ff-rl11-rl-/hn L -,~ ~~ ~ 1 HI! ~ ~IR I~ LU LJ t-M \ All I ~n J- ::::-~\\;~.,~,>: j....)-;:;;.; l/j c",,- 7, T~ ii~ ,..,..,......... ........; IcrV (r) :'1'==;;',-.' ,=:; :; I'~'_'___ ~:_.C:~. .",j/', ~. "., ~>'::~t]jg~~ 'i:::-':;-"-' .__~~i~!~;;~ : 0 iF p' J~:=' :(~~,_:.~};- !.:J ~=.. ~..;c.;.;: J :'.-~''-''-' ...... h,'_ ,._.0..... .___ ~. WTE ~ 1=1 i E(ChA..~* A-- p~~ 3 of )tf VICINITY MAP LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS LOCUST GROVE PLACE SUBDIVISION (t /2 MILE RADIUS) ''\ RT illi' .' -r.~~:L>'.I::". ~~'.I.j~. '\.~ .=?ii~l~.. :=i i~ '~i-~Ii7r;\/I~r.~\i\~-BIk:lSi~ ~ ~lfEJ ',' '" ] -=, - ,I ,I )~-ll'. ~~~~~ 41illllii/I~,,:---~1:t; ~...EJ!~I:-c ~ ;;ll::; ! \ ~Jt . '/, ~ -:! .~'. i ," ntili!!AJ j ~~ ' .~__, I, rr- ;P<./! \ ~ 111l7l7i/;--!,t1/ / .~ I' t .f~~A Iff. - ~!!\I\'i\i\l~ p.I.I'~ I JiJ: ,~ ~ II (II': I' . \l~~ L _ I : I '....., I.' ~ 7 . Ji r~:ID ~}r=;;'--=-:::J;"Y.- ~ .~~~.,->~~ - ~~.- - l",'- ~~---~~~- '~~~'17v~ .,.. !/r~ j ~- I ":ll~, tl -- lc-~ ~._~. ==1"-' "" '~I -;~~~I~. \\ ! --ll ~ "~~'~--'-~ - -- ~ :=I.~. '~'--:....,,' '~.://1?lJ?ar~Jt ~:d",,~:-=')~ ~~Ii ~l-=-ffll=~ - ~ _';- -~c-~~~' ; --=:: I;:J RT ."" r= 1 1 , . R r-- r= r--f tiT : I ~. 1 II r-Q~~l'.... -A '.\ -j.. ~ j ~ c=.b:- J - ') - 1- , __-:. ~]], ~ T - TI - 'l=-I~ If .::.J~I1.-f l_ _ i '~'!~f - . (::f~ -= - IJ_p ttl .- ~ ,,~~- ,,1:0 ~ -=r=-iG F=t: I D , U ~)fJ I-.J -- ~~'V'\l TIl\l'v::~,,~~~Z1 ~ ;" I: ~ ~ ' -= 1- - - _ _ R~ -. - ~ji! kr . ...!/,.. U8if~T~, ~, ~,rt ~:}~~ ~." __ ,_ _. =-l.i===:lL . ::lJl4:; -.. ~\:: CT PROPERTY lie ~;~.kP ~i Wi~, /'. l~,k. ,~~_ ~' ~" -< w=::- ~ ~t ~~ ~' '" ~J1{~ 1:1'~..~1 Q - V' ~~il' _ i ~.~~ ]bJr/.~-\~l~'!I~}r~ _I . I ,~!', ~, L.I R'f- ~ !I- I " ~ /. 1~;-n v / ....:,;;;~ - ~ t...,...!. _ = i \'-' - " ____ _ _ 1.1,1 . ,,,,~ I~ ~tE~..L ~!J-'fi !r~,~~iir-l - -=- I .~ ,~~ '/.1._, :\ ~ :'.. ~w ,; I ~li.tl i i~{1<::: z.vjt.Y4:~ II ~. 6" J \ "~" .,' ....~ ~ I ,I"'> ...--=-I/, '>.;;; ~ ,-"," - ~----1~1: ~~)15, ~~ i:: ~ "'~1 -f I ~', - V'" - ~.~~'~-:'07k-~-~~r I I " I~ .' ~ ~\ -~~ l-D - h=:j!~ .__. _ /I~,I. '.:~ - ___ ,........, I ~ III! I ~IJ "\-t::=r - II - l III l'rIJWI1)I ~~.'J.L ':.- - il ... 10 I I Rr- Ii' I _ - \ -'- T-E -- RL ,... ~~iEL~-JE1 'f~~ !=l=:~.. b"" _I-.I~:JI- ."-:~l=J~ J~~i_ -:"'_! I~,:~ ~~~I-J-_ -$1-1-1-1::1$ December 21, 2000 Scale: I inch = 600 feet <approximate) T ~~ ~ .EkJ~V~t fl- P D-C-f- 4 of 1Lf- VICINITY MAP LOCUST GROVE APARTMENTS LOCUST GROVE PLACE SUBO[YlSION (300 SCALE) -:'=~~~~~~~~~~ PLEASANT nf December 21, 2000 Scale: 1 inch == 300 feet (approximate) E rZ~Y.h.-i: Pc - ,otto/- 5 of 14 I J I .t~ .~ di~~ Facts and Findings: A. Generallnfol111ation Owner - Locust Grove Apartments, LLC. Applicant - Lee Centers RT - Existing zoning (rura] transitional/residentia]) C-G and R-40 - Proposed zoning (general commercial/high density residential) 11.8 - Acres 7 - Proposed building lots 2 - Proposed common lots 22,000 - Square feet of proposed commercial building 180 - Multi-family apartment units proposed 210 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 1,610 - Tota] vehicle trips per day 266 - Traffic Ana]ysis Zone (T AZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 6,326 on 10-18-00 (n/o Pine Street) Better than C-Existing Leve] of Service Better than C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 620-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of-way (2S-feet from centerline) 96-feet required right-of-way (48-feet from centerline) Locust Grove Road is improved with 28-feet of pavement with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. This segment of Locust Grove Road is listed in the District's Five Year Work Program for construction in 2005 to a 3-lane roadway. Fairview Avenue Principal arterial Traffic cOllnt of 29,931 on 7-6-00 (w/o Locust Grove Road) C- Existing Level of Service C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service Traffic count of31,033 on 7-6-00 (e/o Locust Grove Road) C - Existing Level of Service C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Sen' ice 0- feel of frontage Fairview Avenue is improwd with a 5-lane street section. E,x.}4 v~t A. - rCL~'{ of /4 LllClIstG ro\TPI<lce .cmn1 Page ~ Pine Street Collector with bike Jane designation Traffic count of 3,875 on 1-30-99 (e/o E. I Sl Street) Better than C-Existing Leve] of Service Better than C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service O-feet of frontage Pine Street is improved with 2-lanes with some curb, gutter or sidewalk. B. On February 12,2001, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On February 16,2001, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system, The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. The applicant submitted a traffic study with the development application with the following infonnation: 60% of the site traffic will exit the site and travel northbound on Locust Grove Road towards Fairview A venue. Gfthe traffic that reaches Fairview A venue, 60% will travel to the east and 40% will travel to the west. 40% of the site traffic will exit the site and travel southbound on Locust Grove Road toward Pine Street. The site wi I] generate 145 AM peak hour trips and 215 PM peak hour trips. Based on peak hour volumes, Locust Grove Road currently operates at a LOS A. Based on peak hour volumes, Fairview Avenue cun-ently operates at a LOS B. The results of that analysis include the following recommendations: The proposed capital improvement projects on Locust Grove Road, between Franklin and Fairview, and between Fairview and Ustick, will increase the capacity of the intersection at Fairview Avenue and Locust Grove Road. Improvements to Locust Grove Road wi]1 provide a satisfactory Level-of-Service (LOS), provided that they are built on schedule and not after the proposed full build out of this proj ect in 2005. The existing intersection will provide a LOS E without the capital improvements at build out. Site access to Locust Grove Road will require a center tumlane to accommodate the site traffic. D. The applicant is proposing 10 construct a public street into the site located approximately 160- feet sOllth of the n0l1h property line. District policy requires public streets on Locust Gro"e Road to align or offset a minimum of ISO-feet. The proposed public street location confol1llS to District policy. The street should be constructed as a local/commercial street with a 40-foot street section, curb, gutter and sidewalk within 58-feet of right-of-way, The street is proposed to be ] 90-feet in length and does not end at a standard tlJlllaround, and is not proposed to extend in E;d'u~t A - p.~~ 8 of J4 LOC1I51GroyePI;Jct'.cmm Page .3 the future. District policy requires new public streets to end in a fully improved tl1111around. Staffrec0111mends that the applicant construct the roadway with an ACHD approved tumarol1nd at the west end of the street, or construct a private driveway/road in lieu ofa public road. E. Based on the resu Its of the traffic study, the applicant should be required to construct a center tU111 lane on Locust Grove Road for the Brad]ey Court intersection. The tum lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of I DO-feet of storage vvith shadow tapers for both the approach and depm1ure directions. Coordinate the design of the tU1111ane with District staff. F. The applicant is proposing to construct three drive\vays off the proposed Bradley Court. Two of the driveways will serve the office/commercial lots and are located 50-feet west of Locust Grove Road. The third driveway is located at the west end of the proposed Brad]ey Court and will serve the apartment units. The three proposed driveway locations should be approved with this application, as all three comply with District policy. G. StaffrecolTImends that the applicant provide a minimum of20-feet of stacking at the proposed office/commercia] driveways to prevent traffic conflicts with motorists coming into the parking lot off the proposed public street, and motorists backing out of the parking spaces. H. The applicant is not proposing to extend an existing stub street (Scrivner Avenue) into the site because the street would enter the site at the proposed office/commercial area, and Scrivner Avenue was constructed as a local street, not a local/commercial street. Scri vner Avenue is one lot in depth and does not require a public turnaround. Staff recommends that the applicant provide sufficient pedestrian access between the subdivisions. Residents of the subdivision to the south have told the applicant that they do not want a vehicular or pedestrian connection to their subdivision. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the site. This segment of Locust Grove Road is in the Five Year Work Program for widening in 2005 with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Staff typically recommends that the applicants provide a road trust deposit for improvements when the abutting roadway is listed in the Five Year Work Program. HO\:vever, due to the pedestrian usage generated by this site, staff recommends that the applicant construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk in lieu of providing a road trust deposit. The applicant should coordinate the design and location of the sidewalk with District staff. . J. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes oflhis should be required on the final plat. K. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel beillg tracked onto the roadway. The applicant should be required to pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-feel into the site beyond the edge ofpavement of the proposed Bradley COLlrt. E It- VliY;r~ i A: Or- PO-r 9 0+ I if LO('lIstGw\'e Plan' ,('mm Page ..j L. The applicant should provide the District with a copy of a recorded access easement among the parcels for use of the private driveways for access to the public street prior to final plat approval. M. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be bOl11e by the developer. N. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. O. The applicant should be required to locate any proposed gated entry a minimum of 50-feet from a public road. Coordinate the location of any proposed gated entry with District staff. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. COl11muteride staffwill coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more infoTInation contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD COl11muteride Office. R. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this repo11. Special Recommendation to City of J\1eridian: I. The applicant is not proposing to extend Scrivner Avenue into the site because the street would enter the site at the proposed office/commercial area, and Scrivner A venue was constructed as a ]ocal street not a ]ocal/commercial street. Scrivner Avenue is one lot in depth and does not require a public turnaround. Staff recommends that the applicant provide sufficient pedestrian access between the subdivisions. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transport<11ion Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. COlllllluteride .E x:h;~-t It ~ ptJL~ 10 of 11 LocuslGroH'Phlce .clllm P;lge 5 staff will coordinate the Altemative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more infomlation contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 3. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to pm1icipate in any TranspOJiation Management Association (TMA) or Transpoliation Management Organization (TMO) that is f0I111ed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a walTanty deed prior to issuance of a building pemlit (or other required pernlits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way. 2. Constmct a public street into the site located as proposed, approximately] 60-feet south of the north property line. The street shall be constmcted as a 40-foot street section, with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk within 58-feet ofright-of-\vay, and shall end at an ACHD approved turnaround. OR Construct a private driveway/road in lieu of a public street. 3. Construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road for the Bradley Court intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 1 OO-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the tum lane with District staff. 4. Construct three driveways off Bradley Court as proposed: two driveways located 50-feet west of Locust Grove Road and one located at the west end of the proposed Bradley COUl1. 5. Provide a minimum of 20- feet of stacking at the proposed office/commercial driveways to prevent traffic conflicts with motorists coming into the parking lot off the proposed public street, and motorists backi ng out of the parking spaces. 6. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the proposed Bradley Court. 7. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel. Coordinate the location and design oflhe sidewalk with District slaff. .E" X~lrcM't Fl - p~ Il o.p 14 LOClIstGron.' Place .Cllllll Page (1 8. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by tIlis plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. 9. Provide the District with a copy of a recorded access easement among the parcels for use of the private drive\vays for access to the public street prior to final plat approval. 10. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be bome by the developer. 1 I. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. ] 2. Locate any proposed gated entry a minimum of 50-feet from a public road. Coordinate the location of any proposed gated entry with District staff. 13. Other than the public street specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: ]. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action. any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Pl8nning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shaH include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shaH specificallv identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its ori2:ina1 decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. Jfthe Commission agrees 10 reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. :E Id'-u k)-('-c It r OLC;f ) 2., 0+ J '+ LocllstGron'Plncc.cmm P,l)!C 7 3. Payment ofappJicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #] 93, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building pel111it (or other required pem1its), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shal1 be in confom1ance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-] 585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. EK~V&l-t JL ,- rQ~ 1'1 o-F Jt{- L('ICllsIGron:-Plnce ,cmm Pnge S 8. No change in the tenDS ai1d conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confim1ation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subj ect of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subj ect properiy unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff February 28, 2001 f X~0-lt fl - 1rJ-R~V )f of ) f BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF O'NEILL HOMES, LLC, FOR A ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ) CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING RESIDENCE ) INTO AN OFFICE, LOCATED IN AN L-O ZONE) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING / JOHNSON DESIGN APPLICANT FOR: O'NEILL HOMES, L.L.C. APPLICANT. C/C 4/3/0 I CASE NO. CUP-O 1-00 I ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT This matter coming before the City Council on the 3rd day of April, 200 I, under the provisions of Meridian City Code S 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the following action: Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the 1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit for conversion of an existing residence into an office, as described in the "SITElLANDSCAPE PLAN, Drawn CDM, Checked TSJ, Date JAN. 2, 200, SheetA-l.O, A-OFFICE 1.0.dwg 1-1-01, WOODBRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OFFICE, JOHNSON DESIGN, L.L.C, O'NEILL HOMES," O'Neill Homes, LLC, Developer, for the development of the aforementioned conversion of an existing residence into an office, and which property is described as: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / O'NEILL HOMES CUP-O 1-00 1 PAGE 1 OF 6 PARCEL B A parcel ofland in the SE IJ4 of the NE IJ4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, described as BEGINNING at the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, which is south along the east side of said Section 18 and along the center line of Locust Grove Road, 1329.2 feet from a bronze cap marking the northeast corner of said Section 18; thence South 89 degrees II Ih' West, along the south side of the northeast quarter northeast quarter of said Section 18 a distance of 438.7 feet to a steel pin; thence, North 0 degrees 55' East, 149.0 feet to a steel pin; thence North 89 degrees 11 lJ2' East, 436.3 feet to a steel pin; thence, South, 149.0 feet along the east side of said Section 18 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1.5 Acres more or less. 2. That the above named Applicant is granted a conditional use permit for conversion of an existing residence into an office, located at 385 S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is not available to the subject site at this time. The existing sewer septic system and domestic well shall be utilized. Approval of this application needs to be subject to the requirement that sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to and through this parcel with any future development on the parcel, or after a period of six-years, which ever comes first. Applicant to coordinate routing and placement of lines "With Public Works Department. 2.2 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements "With Sanitary Service Company. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I O'NEILL HOMES CUP-O 1-00 1 PAGE 2 OF 6 2.3 Applicant has stated the only signage they intend for the office building will be limited to on-building signs. No freestanding signs are proposed. If, in the future, any freestanding signs are proposed, they shall conform to the new sign ordinance, as follows: maximum height = 8 feet, maximum background area = 50 square feet. 2.4 The required number of parking stalls appears to be met by the plan. The structure is 1632 s.f. Office uses require one space per 400 s.f. This shall require four parking spaces. The handicap parking space width does not meet ADA standards for a van-accessible space. This space shall be increased to a total width of 16 feet (8-foot stall plus 8- foot aisle). The aisle shall be striped separately from the stall and van- accessible signage shall be installed. 2.5 The undeveloped portion of the lot shall be mowed and kept free of weeds greater than 8" tall. 2.6 The Commission/Council concur with the submitted landscape plan as meeting the intent of the Landscape Ordinance with one modification: the trees along the south property line need to continue along the driveway out to Locust Grove, with one tree per 35 1.f. The plan approval is based on the following findings: A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along Locust Grove, beyond right-of-way, with one tree per 35 Lf. A 20-foot wide buffer screen (60% solid) is required adjacent to the residential lot north of the subject property. The double row of trees provided along the north side of the parldng lot meets this requirement. The south property line is required to have the 5-foot perimeter buffer adjacent to the driveway and parldng areas, with one tree per 35 Lf. 2.7 The landscape treatment of the ground plane is not specified on the proposed plan. All required landscape areas shall be vegetated with grass, shrubs, or other vegetative groundcover. 2.8 ACHD is requiring the dedication of 48 feet of right-ofwway from the centerline of Locust Grove Road. However, the Site Plan currently shows only 25 feet from centerline to edge of landscape buffer. The 25- foot wide street buffer is required beyond the 48 feet of right-of-way dedication. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / O'NEILL HOMES CUP-OI-OOI PAGE 3 OF 6 2.9 Applicant shall submit a modified site/landscape plan with the submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, showing the additional trees, correct right-of-way, ground plane landscaping, handicap parking striping and signage, and full planting schedule. 2.10 In accordance with City Ordinance 12~13-8-I, underground year-round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant shall submit irrigation performance specifications in compliance with Ordinance 12-13-8-2 when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 2.11 All required improvements shall be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid shall accompany any request for Temporary Occupancy. 2.12 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 2.13 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 1l~13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.14 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.15 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 2.16 Applicant shall provide a minimum of one (1) two-inch (2") caliper tree per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt area on the site in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.8.3.c. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / O'NEILL HOMES CUP-O 1-00 I PAGE 4 OF 6 2.17 All trash and/or garbage collection areas shall be enclosed on at least three (3) sides in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11 ~ 12~ 1.e. Coordinate trash enclosure locations and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company (SSC) and provide a letter of approval from SSC to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to applying for building permits. 2.18 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 2.19 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2.20 In accordance with City Ordinance 11-13-4.B.2., underground year- round pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 2.21 Applicant shall pave the driveways to their full-required width to a point beyond the edge of pavement abutting Locust Grove Road. 2.22 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 2.23 Applicant shall dedicate 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed. 2.24 Applicant shall provide a $2,890 deposit to the Public Right-of-way Trust Fund at the District for the required street improvements of approximately 149 feet of curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parceL Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 2.25 The building appears to be on a septic system. An accessory use application shall be made with CDHD to determine whether or not septic system is adequate for proposed use. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AFPROV AL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I O'NEILL HOMES CUP~O 1 ~OO I PAGES OF 6 Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 2.26 An acknowledgment letter from the Fire Chief, evidencing that fire hydrants shall only be installed upon further development. A fire hydrant shall be installed upon further development of the property, or after a period of six-years, whichever comes first. 2.27 An adequate turnaround area shall be constructed. This turnaround shall utilize the planned driveway and drive aisles as proposed on the submitted site plan. 2.28 Any further development shall require a conditional use permit. 2.29 All driveways and required parking areas shall be paved in accordance with Section 11-13-4.D, unless othelWise restricted. The area in front of (to the east of) the detached two car garage shall be maintained in gravel per the requirements of the Central District Health Department. This area shall be subject to paving at the time of connection to sanitary sewer. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code 9 11-17-8, a copy of which is attached to this perm' . Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. ,"\'i\\'\\ot;~~;::11111 ,#$':.c.'" _-:' r,;:Z:~,,f"":~ I v ~c;O\WOJ~"1 /: ~ <} Dated: 4-17-{} (I ...,.. "0 ""\ ~ ~ "P'Q." ~p ! \ ~ 43]" 1S't. R J.~ "'~..*..~ '~~'v..\:$r ~'H'H''''~\\.' By:JI$~~M City Clerk Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360Ivl\O'Neill Homes CUrD 1.00 I\CUPOrderO I-DO l.doc ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / O'NEILL HOMES CUP-O 1-00 1 PAGE 6 OF 6 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE IvlATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 70.72ACRES FOR THE PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ) USTICK ROAD AND MERIDIAN ROAD, ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT ) ) 05-24-00 Case No. AZ-OO-021 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were: Steve Arnold and Becky Bowcutt, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the FINDINGS OF FACT following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, before the City FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page I AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL / G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-021) Council, the first publication appearing and 'Written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred (300') feet of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been dilly considered by the City Council at the March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code ss 67-6509 and 67-6511, and ssI1-2-416E and 11-2-4 1 7A, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Title 11, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21,1993, Ordinance No. 629, January 4,1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 70.72 acres in size and is located at the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL! G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-021) northeast corner of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. The property is designated as Sundance Subdivision. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is the McBirney Property Trust of San Jose, California. 6. Applicant is G. L. Voigt Development of Idaho Falls, Idaho. 7. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as Rural Transitional, (RT), and consists of agricultural uses. 8. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as R-8 Medium Density Residential. 9. The subject property is bordered to the north, south and east by Ada County properties, by Meridian subdivisions on the south and west. 10. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. II. The entire parcel of property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: 214 single family lots, 23 common lots and 4 office lots for a residential subdivision. 13. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-8 which FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL/ G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-02I) is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 14. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. IS. The City Council recognizes the concerns of Mike and Donna Anderson, Langley Farms, Limited, and Raque1 Hansen and family. 16. The development is premature due to the fact that sewer service is not readily available, and the additional residential lots would place undue stress and hardship upon public services. 17. It is found to not be in the best interests of the City of Meridian to annex the subject property, at this time, given the subject development proposal. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Municipal Code of the City of Meridian Section 11- 2-417 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL / G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-OO-021) and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of lComprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4,1994. 4. The requested zoning of Medium Density Residential District, (R-8) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-7-2 D. as follows: (R-8) Medium Densitv Residential District: The purpose of the (R-8) District is to permit the establishment of single- and two-family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight (8) dwelling units per acre. This District delineates those areas where such development has or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City and is also designed to permit the conversion of large homes into two-family dwellings in well-established neighborhoods of comparable land use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City is required. 5. That in S 11-2-417 A it provides in part that: 'jlf the Commission and Council approve an annexation request, the Commission and Council shall insure that said annexation is in accord with this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan." 6. Idaho Code S 67-6511(c) provides in matters where the City Council is considering a zoning designation application as follows: "If the request is found by the governing board to be in conflict with the adopted plan, or would result in demonstrable adverse impacts upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services, including school districts, within the planning jurisdiction, the governing board may require the request to be submitted to the planning or planning and zoning commission or, in absence of a commission, the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL; G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT- PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-OO-021) governing board may consider an amendment to the comprehensive plan pursuant to the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67w6509, Idaho Code. Mter the plan has been amended, the zoning ordinance may then be considered for amendment pursuant to section 67-6511(b), Idaho Code." 7. Idaho Code S 67-6512 (a) provides the authority to grant special and/or conditional use permits" . . . . when it is not in conflict vvith the plan." [referring to the Comprehensive Plan.] 8. The City's authority to make and enforce ordinances are confined to vvithin the City's boundaries as provided in Article XII S 2 of the Constitution of the State of Idaho. 9. The provisions of LC. S 50-222 govern the conditions upon which the City!.!1.2Y exercise its authority to annex territory, but the exercise of that authority is discretionary as determined by the City CounciL DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby order and this does order: I) That the application for annexation is denied due to the fact the development is premature and that sewer service is not readily available, and that the additional residential lots would place undue stress and hardship upon public services. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL; G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-OO-021) 2) Based upon the section set forth in item no. I the application for zoning designation is dismissed. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code 967-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the denial of the annexation and zoning may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /11JJ- day of /fpr~ , 2001. ROLLCALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED~ COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED~ COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED abf~ COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL! G.L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-021) DATED: 1-(1-01 MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRlE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED_ MOTION: APPROVED:~ DISAPPROVED: Byilir~~~ ity Clerk Dated: Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Sundance Sub AZ021 PP020\FFCLOrderDeynAZ021.doc FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL/ G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (AZ-OO-021) BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR INGLENOOK ) SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE) EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE, ) NORTH OF VICTORY ROAD IN ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) HUBBLE ENGINEERING FOR ) PROVIDENCE DEVELOPMENT ) LLC ) APPLICANT. ) ) ClC 04/03/01 Case No. PP-OO-028 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on March 20,2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council takes judicial notice of its action of the denial of the application for annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-00-02 7, and the hearing was opened on the preliminary plat application and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT HUBBLE ENGINEERING FOR PROVIDENCE DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR INGLENOOK SUBDIVISION (PP.OO-028) - 1 Shawn Nickel and Richard Thomason, and the City Council based upon its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order in Case No. AZ-OO-027 does hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approval. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is not reasonable nor appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat due to the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-OO-027. DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code Section 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER, that based upon the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-OO-027, the Council does hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approval. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT HUBBLE ENGINEERING FOR PROVIDENCE DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR INGLENOOK SUBDIVISION (PP-OO-028) - 2 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /7 ~ay of ~17/ ~ ,2001. Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works D d C. A ~"Ufttffrlft, epartment an Ity ttorney. i~~1. of ~#.\ By:J!~R~/A Dated: 4-17--{} I'Q:F<P~%._ City Clerk - I L! ! ~ ~~ 1 \~ ~r 181.... ~.ti ',;".t~ ~ ~ . 'f>'ff->~'li \\NP A_NTS40 _PDC\SER VER_7). W ork\M\Meridi an\Meridian I 5360M\lnglenook AZ02 7 PP028\FFCLOrdDenYP~~fHltel\"'\.'~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT HUBBLE ENGINEERING FOR PROVIDENCE DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR INGLENOOK SUBDIVISION (PP-OO-028) - 3 April 13,2001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith April 17, 2001 ITEM NO. 4-A-2 REQUEST Coors Distributing Company emergency permit to hook up to City sewer - 3225 Commercial Court AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POUCE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached if V ~ t&~ ~ J o;wv1V Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shaJl become property of the City of Meridian. Coors Distributing Com{ 3225 Commercial Court Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208) 888-2299 (208) 888-1871 Fax April 13, 2001 APR 1 3 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Mayor Bob Corrie and the Meridian City Council: Coors Distributing Company, located at 3225 Commercial Court, requests an emergency permit to hook up to the city of Meridian sewer. Our current septic system and drain field is beginning to fail. In fact, we have had the system pumped three times in one week. Coors Distributing Company is currently not in the City of Meridian. We are aware and understand that the hook-up to sewer will also constitute several other factors. Namely, annexation to the City of Meridian, municipal water service from Meridian, and other related costs for applicable permits and fees. It is our intention to complete the annexation process, however at this time we would request a permit to expedite the hook-up to city sewer services. If you have any questions or are in need of additional information please contact me at 888-2299. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ~~ George Weissbeck Divisional Vice President Coors Distributing Company rJJ; ~PI ffilrttpA ~~ April 13, 2001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith REQUEST WWTP Digester Drain Line Project Contract Award April 17, 2001 ITEM NO. 4-A-1 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETILERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See affached J..; ~) . _~Ji {v~O 0 (JJl'r jr)ptl qo 0 ,0./ if? l~\ Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( City of Meridian Public Works Dept. Mem To: Mayor and Council From: Brad Watson, P.E. CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk's Office Date: 4/13/01 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for April 17 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item be placed on the April 17 City Council agenda, under Department Reports, for Council's consideration: Wastewater Treatment Plant Claester Drain Line - Award of Contract. This project involves construction of an emergency overflow pipeline from the new digester back into the plant process piping. The existing overflow simply spills over the side to the ground. Keller Associates designed the addition and the WWTP staff solicited formal quotes since the estimated cost was less than $25,000. Four quotes were received and are as follows: JC Constructors Star Construction Inninger Construction Stephenson Construction $16,500.00 $23,887.00 $25,560.00 $27,230.00 JC Constructors recently completed the headwork:s expansion and septage receiving station at the WWTP and did an excellent job. Recommended Council Action: Award the contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Digester Drain Line to JC Constructors, Inc. in the amount $16,500.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest the contract Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this item. From the desk of... Bl1Id Watson, P.E. City Engineer Meridian Public Works DepartrnCll1 200 E. Carlton St., Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-2600 . Page 1 (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 \Wtsonb@ci.mcridian.idus MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ /1/ 2001 APPLICANT REQUEST ITEM NO. 4 -II- -$ f,J/ IJc;</;j::/:f!::ri>d/Yl;1 iiv 5ljyed ~)zM- AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHW A Y DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEITLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS MrJIV Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. City of Meridian Public Works Dept. /- ( Memo llkCP:1l?? API? - . D ~ n.9 'nbt tJPJit ~~"'ji'lOlC ~b~ To: Mayor Corrie From: Gary D. Smith, PE &v- CC: file Date: 04/09/01 R... Woodbridge Subdivision Street Light Agreement ~ Mayor: I would appreciate it if you could place this Agreement on the next City / ~( Council agenda (April 17, 2001) for Council review and approval. It could be placed on the Consent Agenda since it is not of any controversy. This agreement is necessary because the developer has elected to install streetlights and poles in the development that do not conform to the City standard light and pole specifications, which the City will maintain. In that regard, the Homeowner's Association will be responsible for light and pole maintenance and this agreement sets forth the conditions of that responsibility. This agreement is similar to others we have for subdivisions that elect to use a specialty streetlight pole and light. Recommended Council Action: Approve entering into a nStreetlight Agreemenf' with Woodbridge Community LLC pertaining to the streetlights in Snorting Bull Subdivision, Phase I, for the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest Respectfully S.UR:; Gary Smith r 0-- From the desk of... GaIy D. Smith, FE Meridian City Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 200 E. Carlton St., Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-2600 . Page 1 (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT This Street Light Agreement is made and entered into between the CITY OF MERIDIAN and Woodbridge Community LLC, pertaining to the street lights in Snorting Bull Subdivision Phase I, a residential development in Meridian, Idaho. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Woodbridge Community LLC has provided ~ street light poles, concrete pole bases, fixtures, bulbs, and components to the residential development known as Snorting Bull Subdivision Phase I in Meridian, Idaho. The parties acknowledge that the ~ street light poles and appurtenances were specially ordered items not customarily used in residential developments in Meridian, Idaho. 2. Woodbridge Community LLC, or it's assigns, agree to replace, repair and provide any required maintenance of any of the above mentioned street lights, and/or appurtenances thereof, that may hereafter be broken, damaged, or deteriorated, or require maintenance, at its own expense; and it is further agreed that Woodbridge Community LLC, or its heirs, successors and assigns, shall keep the lights operational at all times, it being understood by the City that bulbs, and/or ballast, do bum out and that the City will allow reasonable time to replace them. 3. It is agreed that the City of Meridian authorize and pay for the electrical service to be supplied to the ~ street lights 10Gated in Snorting Bull Subdivision Phase I in the usual and customary manner. 4. It is agreed that the City of Meridian, because Idaho Power Company will not maintain the bulbs and ballast or provide any maintenance, will enter into a Schedule 40 Agreement with Idaho Power Company, and not a Schedule 41 Agreement, which in proper cases provide that Idaho Power Company would provide maintenance, bulbs, and ballast. It is also agreed that lighting served under the Schedule 40 Agreement must be controlled by a photo electric device of the "fail off' type. 5. It is understood and agreed that Woodbridge Community LLC will assign its rights and obligations hereunder to IA\OMl(J((nr1e. l-\i)~()"oNJIv' N/0(JCl6rrron when said Homeowners' Association is fOnUed and operational. SNORTING BULL SUBDIVISION PHASE I - STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT Page 1 This AGREEMENT shall be binding on Woodbridge Community LLC its heirs, successors and assigns, and the CITY OF MERlDIAN. Dated this day of ,20_. CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipality and Political subdivision of the State of Idaho By ATTEST: Robert D. Corrie, Mayor William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk Woodbridge Community LLC By: O'Neill Enterpri~es, Inc, Manager A TIES . By: \)j~\ Derick O'Neill, President Secret S TE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) On this _ day of ,2_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BER~, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY OF MERlDIAN, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SNORTING BULL SUBDIVISION PHASE I - STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT Page 2 County of Ada S5 State of Idaho On this i ~ thday of fk ~eq \),)( {' in the year 2000, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Derick O'Neill and L. Edward Miller known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary of O'Neill Enterprises, Inc., Manager of the limited liability company, Woodbridge Community LLC, the Manager who subscribed said limited liability company name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that O'Neill Enterprises, Inc. executed the same in said limited liability company's name. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (seal) ~~~~~~~~I~;~:..~.~~, ~.......~ .....-....:.t)"'1~"~ ! ~ l ~OT Ai?, y..w':,$ '\ ~*{ . j*~ \, \ PUB\.,\G ,l f ~ tP,. .... we ':>-.0 .... , ~ ~ ~o......w ~"\. .....:0 '~'~'~:'I~~~~""" i' /~(L-L- SNORTING BULL SUBDIVISION PHASE I - STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT Page 3 ~Lem Packet PickUp 111 1 RECEIVED APR 1 7 200f CITY OF MERIDIAN DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 04/18/01 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, April 17, 2001, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on April 18, 2001, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) a;vc[ ~ 20 2001 MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $39,311.96. ? +01 (}f'fWc{O ~ I I clv ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 1O:34am Curren! Period: 04/3012001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Tenninated customers not included Customer.Cust No" {<} 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Non-Delinq Date Amount Msg - --- - ------..-.-.... --- 19.1066.2 SHAFFER, RON & LILA 86,28 57.52 28.76 02106/2001 28.76 - 51.2648.1 A SHADE BETTER PAINTING 80.48 46.72 33.76 0210612001 44.39 - 34.3240.2 ABBOTT, REBECCA 160.80 99.95 60.85 02/12/2001 117.87- 51.1152.1 ADVANCED HEATING 74.00 23,36 16.88 16.88 16.88 12/15/2000 16.88 - 51.1148.1 ADVANCED HEATING 74.00 23.36 16.88 16.88 16.88 12/15/2000 16.88 - 35.0190.2 AHEARN, THOMAS 106.54 50.50 56.04 03/22/2001 58.00 - 1.1360.1 AKERS, GENEVA 319.32 153.23 n30 88.79 01/10/2001 46.4602.1 ALBERTSONS 2.526.84 1 ,017.57 385.69 309.09 814.49 5.0863.1 ALBERTSONS INC #180 1.158.08 1,158.08 12/12/2000 1,558.44 - none 50.1476.1 AU & FARHA ISHAO, SABIHA 568.02 334.48 233.54 03/22/2001 350.00 - none 19.7192.2 ALLEGOOD, DANIEL 99.38 65.34 34.04 02/08/2001 26.38 - 31.3422.1 ALLEN. TIM 124.44 84.19 40.25 02/13/2001 84.33 - none 20.1510.1 ALLRED. JAY D. 110.49 70.24 40.25 03/09/2001 37.86 " none 19.6556.2 AMAR. STEVE 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/2212001 26.38 " 21.1920.3 ANDERSON, BRENT & SEIDL, S. 90.63 60.42 30.21 02108/2001 30.21 - 2.0860.1 ANDERSON. DEAN 121.27 75.74 45.53 03/06/2001 49.36 - none 20.1704.1 ANDERSON. DOUG 49.98 11/20/2000 63.62 - none 22.1482.1 ANDERSON, LYLE D. 142.50 94.59 47.91 02/21/2001 51.74 - none 21.2070.1 ANKENMAN, MICHAEL A 102.09 71.47 30.62 03/22/2001 100.13 - none 14.4428.1 ANN MAKA 125.81 81.73 44.08 02/23/2001 43.85 - 50.2166.1 ARASIM. JAMES 60.47 34.09 26.38 02/08/2001 26.38 - none 21.2656.1 ARCHER. DORSEY 112.51 69.01 43.50 02/13/2001 37.00 - none 68.0070.1 ARES. TONY noo 32.59 44.08 04/05/2001 44.00 - none 2.2110.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 349.61 10/16/2000 91.00 - none 42.1988.2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 146.71 89.69 57.02 03/16/2001 41.70 - 14.5035.1 ARS 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/1312001 26.38 - 51.2620.1 ASHTON, JAY & LAFAYNE 69.84 38.16 31.68 02122/2001 31.68 - none 21 .2212.1 ASMUSEN, RICH & MELISSA 159.05 99.65 59.40 03/15/2001 51.74" none 69.0530.1 ATCHISON, JEFFERY 66.67 36.42 30.25 04113/2001 10.00 - none 21.0066.1 ATHAY, ROBERT 92.71 60.12 32.59 03/12/2001 32.59 - none 2.1420.1 AUXIER. RANDY & DIANNA 117.44 75.74 41.70 02/2012001 79.57 - none 74.3364.2 BAECHT. CARL R. 61.35 32.59 28.76 03/19/2001 52.76 - 21.1928.1 BAILEY, BRUCE R 110.49 70.24 40.25 03/14/2001 76.67 " none 2.3550.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 88.18 52.76 30.21 03119/2001 25.00 - 51.0694.1 BAILEY. PEGGY 78.25 44.21 34.04 03/19/2001 48.00 - none 34.3226.1 BAILEY, ROBERT 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/0812001 26.38 - none 22.1220.1 BAILEY, THOMAS 115.04 28.76 28.76 28.76 28.76 12/1912000 141.61 - none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 257.82 139.02 59.40 59.40 02/05/2001 201.06 - none 33.3696.1 BAITHAVANG. CHAREN 127.70 82.17 45.53 02/09/2001 77.72 - none 2.2130.1 BALDWIN, PIXIE n 75 52.76 24.99 03/05/2001 30.21 "none 21.0052.1 BALDWIN, ROBERT 154.42 117.04 37.38 04/13/2001 45.00" none 31.3300.1 BALL, STEVE 131.65 61.65 30.21 03/2112001 27.27" none 42.1202.1 BANNER, SCOTT 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/1412001 28.76 - none 69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 111.14 36.42 74.72 03/12/2001 101.53 " none 32.0744.1 BARNARD. WILLIAM 114.32 74.07 40.25 02/09/2001 61.87 - none 22.1740.2 BARNHART, RYAN 120.35 26.38 30.21 01124/2001 62.12 - 43.2448.2 BARON. KONA & MICHELLE 85.91 44.21 41.70 03/20/2001 37.87 - 21.3036.2 BARR. GERALDINE 99.00 62.58 36.42 02/21/2001 32.59 - 74.2822.1 BARR. KENNETH 187.74 101.53 86.21 02/22/2001 410.59 " none 34.1650.1 BATEMAN, NICK 94.46 60.42 34.04 02/08/2001 68.08" none 42.3068.1 BAUDER, KEN 90.11 61.35 28.76 03/19/2001 30.36 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:34am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Balance Non-Delinq 02/28/2001 01/31/2001 Date Amount Msg ----~""'"'"""'--- 31.3042.1 BEAN, ALAN & JENNY 123.73 85.86 37.87 03/19/2001 45.53 - none 31.3400.2 BEAN, DONOVAN 2,675.88 2,647.12 28.76 03/20/2001 66.74 - 1.0030.1 BEAUDOIN, JOHN R 105.35 65.48 34.04 04/13/2001 20.00 . none 32.0950.1 BECKER, NICHOLAS 111.86 75.44 36.42 03/13/2001 71.98 - none 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/21/2001 26.38 . none 32.1076.2 BEESON, LORRAINE 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/15/2001 26.36 - 31.1004.1 BEHNER, ROBERT 144.56 97.05 47.51 03/05/2001 120.00 - none 22.2264.1 BELDEN, DANNY & JANELLE 175.74 120.17 55.57 03/01/2001 197.74. none 14.4440.1 BENCO INC 42.71 20.59 22.12 02/12/2001 5.64- 16.3010.1 BENCO INC 89.14 52.76 36.38 03/06/2001 56.03 - 51.3568.1 BENNET, PHILIP & CAROLYN 68.13 41.75 26.38 03/23/2001 39.80 - 46.0834.2 BENNETT, GREG 69.06 36.47 32.59 03/19/2001 40.64 - 2.3600.1 BENNETT, HOWARD 80.90 57.82 23.08 02/12/2001 50.00 - none 74.3366.1 BENNETT, JEFFREY 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/22/2001 28.76 - none 19.6688.1 BENNETT, MASON 116.35 76.67 39.68 03/19/2001 40.00 - none 51.3570.2 BENNETT, PHILIP 58.79 32.86 25.93 02/22/2001 26.83 - 74.3550.3 BENSKI, JON & JENNIFER 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/21/2001 28.53 - 22.2302.1 BERARD, DANIEULORNA 122.70 57.52 28.76 01/11/2001 36.42 - none 21 .3076.1 BERRY, GALE 84.99 84.99 10/13/2000 73.28 - none 74.3296.1 BIENAPFL, ROB & CARMEN 69.01 32.59 36.42 03/15/2001 72.84 - none 21.1754.1 BINGHAM, KEVIN W. 150.16 96.42 51.74 03/15/2001 130.29 . none 46.0244.1 BLANCHARD, SHAWN 67.83 35.24 32.59 02/08/2001 28.76 - none 22.1008.1 BLEDSOE, GARNETT 147.30 99.39 47.91 02/27/2001 51.74- none 34.0744.1 BLEDSOE, JOHN & STEPHANIE 110.99 69.31 41.68 03/02/2001 58.00 - none 2.1580.2 BLESS ENGER. RONNIE & HAZEL 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/22/2001 52.76 - 42.0408.1 BOBKO, RAYMOND 128.93 79.57 49.36 03/20/2001 41.70 - none 50.2374.3 BOETA-ZIMARRAGA, RENE & CA 59.24 32.86 26.38 02/23/2001 52.76 - 51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 62.30 36.92 25.38 03/22/2001 33.04 - none 52.0246.1 BOLO'S PUB & EATERY 769.93 245.22 196.40 03/20/2001 196.40 - none 14.5027.2 BOOTH, DAVID 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/13/2001 26.38 - 46.0468.1 BORCHARDT, KEVIN & TINA 82.06 44.21 37.87 03/20/2001 37.87 . none 21.3058.2 BOREN, GREG & SHAUNA 86.34 65.62 20.72 42.3036.1 BOSIO, LAWRENCE 122.87 62.82 40.05 03/22/2001 21.2124.3 BOUDREAU, YVETTE 173.87 61.65 34.04 03/19/2001 20.00 - 2.2588.2 BOWERS, BRUCE 86.28 57.52 28.76 03/21/2001 28.76 - 74.3796.1 BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER 69.95 34.04 34.04 02/14/2001 26.38 - none 33.1858.1 BRADY, CHRISTOPHER 100.32 66.85 33.47 03/20/2001 37.87 - none 51.07062 BRANDT, LORELI 70.73 36.69 34.04 02/13/2001 82.80 . 31.3022.2 BREEDLOVE, RUSSELL & MICHE 78.85 55.22 23.63 03/21/2001 40.00 - 34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 85.57 55.36 30.21 04/04/2001 75.74 - none 1.0800.1 BREWER, SID & SHELLY 93.40 53.99 39.41 03/21/2001 25.00 - none 4.0890.2 BRIGGS. MIKE 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/13/2001 8.76 - 2.3712.2 BRINEGAR, E.E. 87.51 58.75 28.76 02/23/2001 61.35 - 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 36,549.46 36.486.23 63.23 02/22/2001 125.77 - none 5.0210.1 BRINTON, CLARK 128.41 80.50 47.91 03/12/2001 47.91 - none 1.0390.1 BROADWAY MANOR 291.36 194.24 97.12 02/16/2001 121.79 - none 69.0574.1 BROWN, JAMES & SHERRY 106.38 41.70 64.68 03/13/2001 53.19 - none 22.0902.1 BROWN, KENT & NILA 271.67 120.67 116.65 03106/2001 98.22 - none 51.0334.1 BROWN. MATTHEW & JULIE 60.47 34.09 26.38 03/19/2001 71.95 - none 31.0174.1 BROWN. RONALD 66.28 57.52 28.76 02/13/2001 28.76 - none 51.4010.2 BRUCK, JACK & DAWN 88.04 23.36 53.79 22.0810.1 BRUNELLO, JOHN L 107.11 71.61 35.50 02/07/2001 45.00 - none 74.3226.1 BUCHSIEB, GWENDOLYN 66.81 36.42 30.39 03/23/2001 60.00 - none 47.0028.1 BUCK, CHARMIAN 57.24 31.86 25.38 02/13/2001 25.38 - none 33.1852.1 BUNDY. DOYLE 86.90 52.76 26.38 03/07/2001 45.00 . none ... in Msg colu mn indicates no NOlice is to be sent ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page; 3 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17.2001 10:34am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Balance Non-Delinq Date Amount Msg - -----.---.....- - - - - -------.-..- 32.1546.4 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 100.26 63.95 36.31 03/14/2001 40.00. 19.5494.4 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 110.49 74.07 36.42 02/12/2001 116.85 - 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 62.28 31.14 31.14 02/23/2001 62.28 - none 2.4890.2 BURNS, EMMETT 107.89 67.64 40.25 03/21/2001 40.25 - 5.0678.1 BURT, MARK A 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/13/2001 30.21 - none 42.2460.1 BURTON, JACK 136.73 72.05 64.66 03/22/2001 49.36 - none 4.2308.1 BUTTERFIELD, CHARLES & TON 220.47 134.26 86.21 02/13/2001 260.28 - none 34.0696.1 BUTTRAM, DEANNA 90.63 56.59 34.04 02/22/2001 25,57 - none 32.1570.1 CALDWELL, PATRICK 114.68 69.31 45.37 03/22/2001 29,97 - none 31.1274.1 CALLISON, JAMES & BARBARA 109.26 76.67 32.59 02/13/2001 52.80 - none 14.4488.2 CAMPBELL SR, DOUGLAS T 173.74 40.98 49.36 41.70 01105/2001 37.87 - 34.0990.1 CAMPBELL, DOUGLAS 118.67 69.31 45.53 3.83 03/23/2001 45.53 - none 65.0242.1 CAMPBELL, GARY 65.53 35.32 30.21 02/22/2001 30.21 - none 42.0414.2 CAMPBELL, ROBERT 102.83 66.41 36.42 03/06/2001 36.42 - 21.2664.1 CAMPBELL, ROLLAND 85.36 57.52 27.64 01/18/2001 87.20 - none 31.0010.1 CANDACE ADKINS 159.09 99.71 59.36 02/14/2001 144.17 - none 22.1050,1 CANON. BILL & BETSY 107.62 76.67 30.95 02/20/2001 90.00 - none 65.3150.1 CARICO, SCOTT 49.78 28.76 21.02 03/20/2001 28.76 - none 19.7968.2 CARLYLE, HOWARD 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/22/2001 2.4590.1 CARNAHAN, JOHN 95.83 57.96 37.87 02/13/2001 34.1808.2 CARP ENTER, DOUGLAS 121.72 75.30 46.42 02/14/2001 65.0686.1 CARPENTER, GAIL 75.35 36.93 36.42 03/20/2001 35.1038.2 CARR, BENJAMINE & CATHERIN 68.13 34.09 34.04 02/12/2001 3.4001.1 CASCADE BUILDERS 455.89 50.2106.1 CASELLA. GARY 54.55 34.09 20.46 03/19/2001 26,38 - none 2.5130.1 CASPERSEN, MAUREEN K 109.01 70,40 37.67 03/21/2001 75,00 - none 50.0310.2 CASSo BRUCE C 167.81 135.05 52.76 34.2876.1 CATLETT, SCOTT 102.12 64.25 37.87 02/26/2001 34.04 - none 33.3650.2 CATLIN, BETH 80.37 53.99 26.38 02/12/2001 30.21 - 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C. 480.86 294,47 186.39 04/16/2001 488.96 - 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 104.06 67.64 36.42 03/19/2001 36.42 - none 42.2582.1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 112.95 72. 70 40.25 03/14/2001 72.84 - none 22.0648.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 269.18 115.11 86.21 02/27/2001 50.00 - none 74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 69.01 36.42 32.59 02/23/2001 69.01 - none 21.0218.1 CHEN. L1L1 & YIZE 109.48 52.76 30.21 26.51 04/16/2001 26.38 - none 2.6100.1 CHENEY. STEVEN 99.53 61.65 37.67 .01 03/20/2001 12.62 - none 50.1774.1 CHERRY'S BUILTIN VACS 439.39 137.85 172,82 128.72 03/14/2001 343.20 - none 15.0047.2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 153.14 99.95 53,19 03/19/2001 98.72 - 21.2160.1 CHRISTENSEN. KARL L. 191.82 149.58 42.24 02/13/2001 34.58 - none 34.1204.1 CHRISTOFFERSON, ANDREW 345.24 67.94 34.04 03/09/2001 109.04 - none 42.1956.1 CHRISTOPHERSON, ALLAN 86.28 57.52 26.76 02/15/2001 28.76 " none 22.1466.1 CHURCHMAN. STEVE J. 410.10 228.56 181.54 03/2012001 100.00 . none 33.4344.1 CIRELLI, MARK 84.93 63.02 21.91 02/13/2001 80.80 " none 31.0162.1 CLARK, JAMES & KAREN 182.41 113.90 68,51 03/23/2001 60.85 - none 40.0432.1 CLARKE, JOHN 109.78 71.91 37.87 03/14/2001 45.53 - none 42.1190.1 CLARKSON, BRIAN 80.37 53.99 26.38 03/06/2001 26.38 - none 2.2800.3 CLEMENT, MICHAEL 86.80 60.42 26.38 03/21/2001 30.21 - 21.2214.2 CLEVELAND, RICHARD & KARE!\ 116,92 76.67 40.25 03/01/2001 50.63 - 5.0344.1 CLIFF. DWIGHT 86,28 57.52 28.76 02/13/2001 87.51 - none 22.2246.1 CLIFFORD. JEFFERY 195.28 125.26 70.00 03/13/2001 71 .28 - none 52.0376.1 CM CO INC 1,077.60 337.44 246.72 12/19/2000 199.92 - 34.0536.1 COATES, JOSEPH & DARLENE 85,41 62.56 22.83 03/26/2001 20,00 - none 40.0066.1 COCHELL, TIM & ANGELlA 99.52 61.65 37.87 02/22/2001 33.84 - none 21 .1766.1 COFFMAN. RICK K 132.90 83.54 49.36 03/19/2001 53.19 - none 72.0182.1 COLSON, KENNETH 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/16/2001 26.76 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is 10 be sent ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account Llst- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:35am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Name Non-Delinq Date Amount Msg ------ 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 73.34 36.42 36.92 03/22/2001 80.00 - 3.0304.1 COOK, CASEY 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/13/2001 26.38 - none 50.0260.2 COOK, JOHN 58.62 32.86 25.76 03/23/2001 27.00 - 69.2252.1 COOK, PETER 28.76 02/13/2001 95.42 - none 5.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 103.35 65.48 37.87 03116/2001 71.91 - none 21.2928.1 COOPER, CLINTON & CAMILLE 93.80 61.21 32.59 02116/2001 32.59 - none 50.4618.1 CORANDVIEW HOMES LLC 48.37 12.96 6.48 31.3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 96.95 65.46 31.47 03/2112001 35.0162.2 COVINO, AMMON & CRYSTAL 134.98 36.69 37.87 12/21/2000 21.0490.1 cox, TIMOTHY 102.67 70.24 32.43 02/22/2001 40.00 - none 33.3592.1 CRADER, PAMELA 131.90 52.76 26.38 12/21/2000 106.66 - none 42.4070.1 CROSS. ARBY 87.51 58.75 28.76 03/21/2001 12.11 - none 74.2336.1 CROWELL, GARY 83.40 45.53 37.87 02/09/2001 37.67 - none 21.1918.1 CULVER, JAMES 93.94 61.35 32.59 02/20/2001 32.59 - none 51.0996.1 CULVER, WALTER 283.22 55.70 53.19 12/26/2000 43.76 - none 74.2692.2 CUSHMAN, KELLY 91.99 44.08 47.91 02/26/2001 40.25. 42.0434.1 DAHLGREN, SHIRLEY 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/22/2001 26.38 - none 51.0910.1 DAHMER, JOLENE 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/08/2001 26.38 - none 42.2388.2 DALY, BERT 111.44 75.02 36.42 03/19/2001 125.43 - 32.0910.3 DARRELL HOUSTON 86.52 60.14 26.38 40.0380.3 DAVIDSON, DOUGLAS & JANINE 108.41 70.54 37.87 03102/2001 42.2400.1 DAVIS, LEE W. 66.28 57.52 28.76 03114/2001 2.0908.2 DAVIS, MARGARET 65.43 55.22 30.21 02/1312001 52.76 - 74.1058.1 DAVIS, NORMA 52.76 26.38 26.38 03114/2001 52.76 - none 21.0454.1 DAWDY, CALVIN 107.18 69.31 37.87 02/26/2001 37.87 - none 4.1830.1 DEASON, RICK 145.10 65.70 59.40 02/22/2001 47.91 . none 21 .3070.1 DECK, KIMBERLY 116.85 75.74 41.11 02/1412001 70.00 - none 32.0902.3 DEEL. RICHARD 498.20 169.83 129.79 12/22/2000 33.07 . 72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 57.77 32.59 25.18 0311312001 40.00 - none 50.0230.1 DEMOTT. RUBY M 59.24 32.86 26.38 03122/2001 26.38 . none 34.2762.1 DENNEY, ROBERT 136.73 87.09 49.64 03115/2001 90.00 - none 69.0704.1 DENNING, RICHARD & LORA 130.29 63.23 67.06 03114/2001 67.06 - none 32.1254.1 DENNIS, LORI 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/06/2001 26.38 - none 2.1960.1 DICKSON. DONALD M 125.10 75.74 49.36 02/13/2001 119.90 - none 50.0204.1 DIPAOLO. JONATHAN 97.94 46.18 49.76 02/27/2001 50.00 - none 3.0710.2 DOBARAN. JOHN 58.30 33.76 24.54 03/14f2001 16.88 - 3.0700.1 DOBARAN. JOHN & ARVELLA 268.95 167.81 101.14 03f2012001 112.63 - none 34.1690.1 DOCKWEILER, THOMAS & TERR 102.12 64.25 37.87 0312012001 37.87 - none 21.0144.1 DOMKA, TIMOTHY 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/2612001 58.28 - none 42.1200.1 DOOLEY, DAVID & LESLIE 91.34 58.75 32.59 0310112001 28.76 - none 42.2272.2 DRANSFIELD. ROBERT 84.06 57.68 26.38 0311512001 26.38 - 20.1588.2 DREXLER, JOHN 82.97 26.38 26.38 01122/2001 69.03 - 4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 103.14 66.41 36.73 03122/2001 30.00 - none 51.0698.2 DUEROCK. WALTER 361.91 36.69 26.36 04110/2000 23.25 - 40.0048.1 DUGGER, CRAIG 115.55 71.47 44.06 02/13/2001 36.42 . none 50.1224.1 DUNBAR, WILLIAM & PATRICIA 59.24 32.86 26.36 03113/2001 26.38 - none 34.2802.1 DUNSTAN, BRETT & MICHELLE 251.92 150.39 101.53 03/15/2001 114.97 - none 3.0014.1 DUNSWORTH, BRAD 81.47 57.52 23.95 03/16/2001 30.00 - none 20.1258.2 DUPREE. JOHN 205.53 140.85 64.68 02/09/2001 68.51. 34.0886.1 DUREN, ALLEN & KELLEY 155.74 98.72 57.02 03/14/2001 57.02 - none 42.2396.3 DUVALL, KEN & PATTTI 84.20 57.82 26.38 03/02/2001 26.38- 74.3330.3 DUVALL, KENNETH 80.50 40.25 40.25 0311912001 32.59 - 31.2318.1 EAGLE, ROBERT 113.09 76.67 36.42 03119/2001 41.48. none 21.1160.1 EASTMAN, SCOTT 102.83 66.41 36.42 02/22/2001 36.42 - none 2.1690.3 EBLEN, EARL 131.90 52.76 26.38 ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17.2001 10:35am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pm! Cust No Non-Delinq 12/31/2000 Date Msg - - ------........- ---- -- 50.4602.1 EBORN. RICHARD 94.12 49.05 45.07 03/22/2001 50.00 - none 74.3370.1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADOR 91.99 40.25 51.74 03/22/2001 26.26 - none 48.1633.1 EDDY'S BAKERY 298.34 03/15/2001 300.00 - 21.1106.1 EDGERTON. BRIAN 114.46 70.38 44.08 02/2712001 22.1502.2 EDWARDS. ROBERT 202.03 124.93 77.10 0212212001 65.15 - 72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO( 757.12 757.12 09/19/2000 146.08 - none 68.0138.1 ELLINGTON, BRUCE 61.35 28.76 32.59 03/20/2001 44.08 - none 46.0328.1 ELLIS, JAY 64.00 35.24 28.76 0212212001 28.76 - none 34.0592.1 ELLIS, TODD & DANA 207.60 107.61 60.85 04106/2001 150.00 - none 69.0524.1 ELORDI, PAT & BEKKI 107.31 47.91 59.40 03/01/2001 55.57 - none 64.0014.1 EMERALD HOMES INC 43.20 6.48 6.48 64.0072.2 ENGLEMAN, ROGER & LISA 66.90 32.86 34.04 03/20/2001 37.87 - 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 113.22 10/18/1999 32.69 - none 34.0846.1 EQUALS, SEAN 116.07 74.37 41.70 03/19/2001 37.87 - none 50.1238.1 ERHART, MILT 96.03 50.50 45.53 03/23/2001 96.57 - none 50.1236.3 ERHART, MILT 89.45 32.86 26.38 01/09/2001 123.20 - 50.1240.2 ERHART. MILTON 83.20 49.27 33.93 03/22/2001 95.00 - 51.3340.1 ERICKSON, LYDIA 59.24 32.86 26.38 02107/2001 30.21 - none 50.1354.2 ESTATE OF BESSIE MATCHAM 70.59 40.38 30.21 03/23/2001 30.21 - 2.0320.1 ESTEP, NINA 79.12 52.76 26.36 02122/2001 25.00 - none 19.0358.3 EUDY. DONALD 100.37 60.12 40.25 02112/2001 74.06 - 31.0436.2 EVANS, KIM 159.43 106.24 53.19 03/20/2001 53.19- 50.3822.1 EVANS. M. SHAE 82.08 48.04 34.04 02113/2001 26.38 - none 42.4050.1 EVERMAN, BRYAN 108.88 74.37 34.51 03/20/2001 41.70 - none 46.4996.2 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR 423.92 157.47 134.16 03/26/2001 88.75 - 2.2060.1 FARMER, SCOTT 110.49 70.24 40.25 03119/2001 40.25 - none 19.6502.1 FARNWORTH. WARREN 86.28 57.52 28.76 02108/2001 85.18 - none 4.1240.2 FARRELL, JOHN P. 85.26 57.52 27.74 02112/2001 33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 166.80 75.74 49.36 03/08/2001 41.70 - none 34.1092.1 FERGUSON. BLAIR G 127.84 63.16 64.68 02/12/2001 53.19 - none 42.1840.1 FETTERS, CARMEN 82.97 52.76 30.21 03/26/2001 52.76 - none 31.3000.1 FIFE, LYNN D 108.41 70.54 37.87 02114/2001 34.04 - none 34.2726.1 FIRST THINGS FIRST 439.18 352.20 86.98 04/0212001 197.87 - none 32.1258.2 FISH, JUSTIN & KATIE 85.43 55.22 30.21 02/22/2001 26.38 - 74.1006.1 FISHEL. GEORGE 74.50 41.08 33.42 02/13/2001 90.22 - none 74.1056.1 FISHER, BEA J. 52.76 26.38 26.38 0311912001 24.14 - none 22.1614.1 FISHER, DONALD H 80.34 28.76 03/14/2001 111.81 - none 32.0568.1 FISHER, MELVIN 78.82 52.76 26.06 03/05/2001 50.00 - none 2.0740.1 FISK, PATRICK 234.48 147.14 87.34 03/21/2001 76.17 - none 2.4160.1 FITZGERALDS. JOHN 73.62 49.08 16.88 03107/2001 16.88 - none 5.0800.1 FITZSIMMONS, TOM 82.97 52.76 30.21 03/20/2001 64.25 - none 1.1160.1 FLATEN. DONALD J. 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/14/2001 52.76 - none 1.1164.2 FLATEN, ROBERT 82.97 52.76 30.21 02/20/2001 26.38 - 48.2696.1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 734.87 544.08 190.79 03122/2001 443.57 - none 48.2694.1 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 2,500.96 1,176.16 1,324.80 03/22/2001 1 ,313.58 - none 21.2662.1 FORBUS, JAMES 103.92 67.50 36.42 02/26/2001 28.76 - none 69.0738.1 FORGY, MICHAEL 89.90 47.91 41.99 03/2012001 50.00 - none 22.1618.1 FOWERS. JOHN 26.11324 26,066.92 46.32 03115/2001 54.26 - none 21.2924.1 FRAME, JONATHON 100.61 70.40 30.21 02/22/2001 30.21 - none 31 .3434.1 FRANK, GARY 114.98 73.28 41.70 02115/2001 53.19" none 74.0704.1 FRANK, GARY E 75.74 34.04 37.87 03/20/2001 37.87 - none 21.1506.2 FRECKELTON, BRUCE 102.12 64.25 37.87 0211212001 34.04- 42.1042.1 FRED MEYER 5,817.95 4,182.95 1 ,635.00 03/22/2001 2,688.60 - none 51 .3226.1 FREITAS, DANIEL 59.24 32.86 26.38 02115/2001 52.76 - none 31.3050.1 FRENCH. DEBRA 13,073.80 13.043.59 30.21 03119/2001 26.38 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:35am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Non-Delinq 02128/2001 01/31/2001 Date Amount Msg - -------.-. - - - ------.-...---- 74.2746.1 FRENCH, JOHN & KATHY 52.76 26.38 26.38 02120/2001 55.14 - none 72.0210.1 FRITZMEIER, RANDY 123.25 77.10 46.15 02113/2001 75.00 - none 34.2856.1 FROSTROM, ED & KATHY 256.92 120.33 64.68 01/02/2001 30.21 - none 33.4258.1 FROSTROM, STEVE & TERRI 131.61 90.11 41.70 03/21/2001 67.46 - none 22.0342.1 FRY, JOHN & SHERRIE 133.47 85.56 47.91 02/22/2001 95.82 - none 34.1176.1 FRY, LARRY 100.89 63.02 37.87 02/23/2001 98.72. none 20.1920.1 FUERSTENAU, ROBERT R 145.48 92.29 53.19 02/22/2001 45.53 - none 1.1250.1 FUHRMAN, JAMES 141.79 92.43 49.36 02/16/2001 30.21 - none 1.1280.1 FUHRMAN. JAMES 168.74 100.23 68.51 02/16/2001 91.49. none 1.1240.1 FUHRMAN, JAMES 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/16/2001 34.04 - none 1.1260.1 FUHRMAN, JAMES 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/16/2001 26.36 - none 1.1290.1 FUHRMAN, JAMES 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/16/2001 26.38 - none 1.3520.1 FUHRMAN, KENT 170.20 79.57 34.04 12/22/2000 17.73 - none 51.0522.1 FUHRMAN, KENT 63.07 36.69 26.36 03/22/2001 71.91 - none 32.0676.1 GAINOR, THOMAS & DIA 23,581.31 23.456.17 45.53 03/23/2001 50.00 - none 20.0204.2 GALLEGOS, ANTHONY 97.83 65.63 32.20 03/15/2001 32.20 - 50.0530.2 GALLOWAY. JERMAINE & KRISTI 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/16/2001 30.21 - 72. 0200.1 GALLOWAY, KARL & NONA 69.01 32.59 36.42 02/05/2001 68.16 - none 2.6630.1 GALVAN, STEVEN 106.78 66.71 40.07 03/13/2001 15.00 - none 31.0012.2 GAMBLIN. MIKE 119.62 85.58 34.04 02/12/2001 79.57 - 46.4990.2 GAP UTILITIES. STORE #06046 92.98 54.22 36.76 02/20/2001 239.76 - 22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 105.21 69.01 36.20 03/19/2001 40.00 - none 34.118R 1 GARDNER, WILLIAM 100.75 62.88 37.87 01/11/2001 79.57 - none 21.3048.2 GARLICK. LEWIS 52,190.54 52,120.42 70.12 03/23/2001 100.00 - 21.0042.1 GARRARD, JOHN 105.43 69.01 36.42 02123/2001 44.08 . none 21.0234.3 GARRETT, DAMON 220.73 156.94 63.79 03/21/2001 120.00 - 2.2460.1 GILBERT, CARL 193.09 121.56 71.53 03/19/2001 54.00 . none 34.0394.1 GILBERTSON, KEVIN 114.70 76.63 34.04 3.83 03/21/2001 34.04 . none 35.0118.1 GLEN JONSON HOMES 65.72 32.66 26.38 6.48 02/23/2001 12.96 - 6.1804.1 GLENN JOHNSON 85.62 52.76 26.38 6.48 02/23/2001 6.48 - 35.1156.1 GLENN JOHNSON 85.62 32.86 26.38 26.38 02/23/2001 60.56 - 15.0013.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 105.52 52.76 26.38 26.38 02/23/2001 30.29 - 16.3314.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 105.52 52.76 26.38 26.38 02/23/2001 30.29 - 35.0256.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 69.24 36.38 26.38 02/23/2001 55.02 - 35.0273.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 65.72 26.38 6.48 02/23/2001 12.96 - 21.2106.2 GOEHRING, DAVID C 124.55 36.38 26.38 11/22/2000 66.06 - 32.1528.1 GOINS, RICHARD 105.52 52.76 26.38 26.38 01/18/2001 55.26 . none 21.2790.1 GORRINGE. BENNY 141.13 89.39 51.74 02/20/2001 109.65 . none 31.3374.1 GOULDING, PAULINE 147.80 94.61 53.19 03/22/2001 45.53 - none 34.3206.1 GRAYSON, DIANA 102.65 55.36 26.38 04/12/2001 26.38 - none 69.0376.1 GRAYSON, GARY 95.82 44.08 51.74 03/06/2001 62.00 - none 50.1486.2 GRIEP, RONALD 320.15 95.01 73.77 01/16/2001 112.07 - 31.0158.1 GRIFFIN, RICHARD & GAIL 137.82 88.46 49.36 03/21/2001 102.55 - none 34.2126.1 GRIGG, DANA K 83.63 57.68 25.95 03/16/2001 30.00. none 50.2412.3 GRISHAM, DANIEL & JANET 79.48 41.61 37.87 03/01/2001 34.04 . 21.2712.2 GROSS, ROBERT 103.52 28.76 28.76 01/03/2001 84.94. 20.2034.1 GROSSMAN, MICHAEL M. 97.77 65.18 32.59 02109/2001 72.84 - none 20.1980.2 GROVE, ROBERT & CHARLENE 134.84 79.27 55.57 02112/2001 47.91 - 74.2554.1 GROW. SHANNON 65.18 32.59 32.59 02/22/2001 32.59 - none 4.1960.1 GULL, SCOTT & GAIGH 108.98 72.56 36.42 02/13/2001 32.59 - none 21.2718.1 GUNTER, STEVEN & KRISTA 95.15 58.75 32.59 03/15/2001 60.00 - none 42.2070.3 HADLEY, BRENT 131 .27 75.74 55.53 02/14/2001 113.61 - 42.2138.2 HADLEY, STEPHANIE 178.34 88.30 90.04 03/15/2001 125.00 . 4.0934.1 HAFER, RUSSELL 138.02 28.76 36.42 01/12/2001 38.88 - none 4.1296.2 HALES. KENNETH 134.70 86.79 47.91 02/20/2001 47.91 - ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( (~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account Ust- council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17.2001 10:35am Curren! Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pm! Last Pmt Non-Delinq 01/31/2001 Date Amount Msg ------- 4.1594.1 HALL, BRIAN 20,882.46 20,851.11 31.35 03/20/2001 40.00 - none 22.1348.4 HAMAN, ROBERT 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/26/2001 26.38 - 33.2338.1 HAMIL TON, TRACEY 180.09 100.09 80.00 03/21/2001 111.70 - none 33.4274.1 HANSEN, ERIK 126.56 76.97 49.59 03/16/2001 45.00 - none 2.0906.1 HARMON, ROBERT K. & R HALL 93.09 59.05 34.04 03/06/2001 34.04 - none 74.3230.1 HARRISON. THOMAS 68.08 30.21 37.87 02/13/2001 71.99 - none 5.0506.1 HART, RANDY 197.78 132.17 65.61 02/12/2001 219.21 - none 31.2218.1 HART, WILLIAM 86.28 57.52 28.76 03/02/2001 28.76 - none 2.5900.1 HARVEY, LISA M 108.41 66.71 41.70 03/16/2001 51.04 - none 31.3036.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 105.02 66.85 37.87 .30 02/20/2001 94.00 - none 40.0050.1 HAUSHEER. JAMES & CAROL 172.18 37.82 26.38 26.38 10/12/2000 26.54 - none 32.1388.1 HAYHURST. MARVA 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/14/2001 26.38 - none 33.4246.1 HELFERICH, ROGER 91.75 56.59 35.16 02/12/2001 30.00 - none 32.1756.1 HENNING, MARTIN & JEANNIE 82.97 52.76 30.21 02/09/2001 26.38 - none 20.1450.1 HENSHEID, TOM & RENEE 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/13/2001 28.76 - none 50.1452.1 HEPPER, TED 148.39 23.36 35.38 01/19/2001 212.43 - none 31.3470.1 HERNANDEZ, TERESO 164.35 111.16 53.19 02/09/2001 57.02 - none 21.2868.1 HESSING, MIKE 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/12/2001 26.38 - none 3.0036.2 HESTER, CHRISTINE 86.28 57.52 28.76 03/21/2001 17.52 - 3.0094.2 HESTER, CHRISTINE A 200.23 129.34 70.89 03/21/2001 98.01 - 74.0384.1 HESTER, LL YOD & SHERRY 56.40 26.38 30.02 03/23/2001 54.00 - none 69.0928.1 HICKEY. JERRY 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/16/2001 65.18 - none 31.3454.2 HICKMAN, JOHN & JENNIFER 145.03 96.12 48.91 03/14/2001 103.00 - 32.0566.2 HICKS, BARBRA J 81.74 55.36 26.38 02/13/2001 29.56 - 51.3580.1 HIGGINBOTHAM, RON 144.50 79.25 65.25 03/19/2001 16.54 - none 64.0070.1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTION 85.62 32.86 26.38 01/17/2001 23.81 - 32.0710.2 HILL. LANCE & HOLLY 112.38 70.68 41.70 03/01/2001 53.19 - 22.0320.1 HITESMAN, DOLPH & EILEEN 153.99 94.59 59.40 03/20/2001 63.23 - none 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 31,375.89 31,294.90 80.57 03/21/2001 181.00 - none 33.4346.1 HOLLOWAY, PAIGE 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/12/2001 83.12 - none 51.4250.1 HOME PRO PLUMBING 403,80 154.24 128.61 01/17/2001 124.78 - none 3,0362,1 HONO, GREG & NANCY 148.93 93.36 55.57 03/21/2001 51.74 - none 20.1556,1 HOOVER, L YND 386.95 266.27 120.68 02/05/2001 80.50 - none 74.1190.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 217.88 71,35 67.52 01/25/2001 90.50 - none 31.3458.1 HOPKINS. DARRYL 20,885.16 20,851.11 34.05 01/19/2001 99.45 - none 32.0482.1 HORTON. EVERETT 252.44 119.24 64.68 .01 02/13/2001 57.01 - none 51.0470.1 HORTON, ROBERT 72.41 50.50 21,91 03/09/2001 130.00 - none 50.1922.2 HOUSING OPP MGMNT SER 90.67 46.59 44,08 02/22/2001 44.08 - 3.0010,1 HOWARD. KEITH 148.79 97.05 51.74 02/26/2001 44.08 - none 7.0244.1 HOWARD, MICHAEL 86.28 57,52 28.76 03/14/2001 28.78 - none 1.0470.3 HOWELL, GA YLEEN 77.90 49,79 28.11 03/20/2001 28.11 " 33.2652.1 HOWELL, KATHLEEN 123.73 82,03 41.70 03/21/2001 79.57 - none 69.0294.1 HOWLAND, LAWSON 89.01 32.59 36.42 02/13/2001 44.08 - none 15.0068.1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 127.94 127.94 09/12/2000 17.26 - 15.0071.1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 120.87 120.87 50.3804.2 HRISTOU, JORDAN & JRINA 59.24 32.86 26.38 02/12/2001 3,0814,1 HUNEMILLER. KIM 90.11 57.52 32.59 02/02/2001 20.0700.2 HYMAN, AARON 79.14 26.38 26.38 02/02/2001 21.0470.1 HYVONEN, CLARK 95.69 61.65 34.04 02/20/2001 122.53 - none 52.0948.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 187.81 109.49 78.32 02/23/2001 59.17 - none 49.1148.1 IDAHO HEATING AND AIR 681.62 219.05 169.82 12/04/2000 146.49 - 48.2840.1 IDA-TRAN 2,450.50 1,101.10 1.349.40 03/15/2001 144.00 - none 50.1606.1 INTEGRITY LLC 110.08 61.52 48.56 03107/2001 35.96 - none 32.1090,1 IVERSON. GARY & SHEILA 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/21/2001 26.38 - none 52.0700.1 JABIL CIRCUIT 4,309.86 2,166,95 2,142.91 03/22/2001 2,383.98 - ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account list- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:35am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Non-Delinq 02/28/2001 Date Amount Msg ---~--- 52.0750.1 JABIL CIRCUIT 2,770.77 1,408.86 1.111.83 250.08 04/06/2001 1,111.83 - 2.5820.1 JACKSON, ROBERT 89.45 59.19 30.21 .05 03/06/2001 32.00 - none 65.3112.1 JACOBS, MARIE 52.62 26.38 26.24 02/07/2001 52.00 - none 50.0098.1 JACOBSEN, MARJORIE M. 72.62 31.86 25.38 12/11/2000 83.64 - none 50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/07/2001 26.38 - none 42.0700.1 JAMES A KISSLERlOAKBROOK 156.93 111.52 45.41 02/22/2001 33.0380.1 JAMES COURT APTS 206.25 138.73 67.52 03/20/2001 67.52 - none 33.0362.1 JAMES COURT APTS 202.56 135.04 67.52 03/20/2001 67.52 - none 33.0366.1 JAMES COURT APTS 218,78 139.06 79.72 03/20/2001 79.72 - none 33.0370.1 JAMES COURT APTS 207.62 136.27 71.35 03/20/2001 67.52 - none 33.0358.1 JAMES COURT APTS 1,731.96 1,154.64 577.32 03/20/2001 577.32 - none 33.0376.1 JAMES COURT APTS 101.28 67.52 33.76 03/20/2001 37.59 - none 33.0408.1 JAMES COURT APTS 256.92 171.28 85.64 03/20/2001 83.04 - none 33.0382.1 JAMES COURT APTS 116.60 71.35 45.25 03/20/2001 41.42 - none 33.0386.1 JAMES COURT APTS 211.17 143.65 67.52 03/20/2001 97.52 - none 33.0388.1 JAMES COURT APTS 135.04 67.52 33.76 01/19/2001 33.76 - none 33.0390.1 JAMES COURT APTS 111.54 70.12 41.42 03/20/2001 37.59 - none 33.0394.1 JAMES COURT APTS 191.49 135.04 56.45 01/19/2001 36.97 - none 33.0396.1 JAMES COURT APTS 166.39 105.82 60.57 03/20/2001 52.91 - none 33.0400.1 JAMES COURT APTS 218.97 139.96 79.01 03/20/2001 71.35 . none 33.0374.1 JAMES COURT APTS 691.88 467.33 224.55 03/20/2001 236.04 - none 21.1712.1 JAMES, MELANIE 79.05 57.52 21.53 03/20/2001 35.00 - none 31.0516.1 JARRETT, SHARON 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/13/2001 26.38 - none 21.1912.1 JENKINS, DWIGHT 105.95 68.08 37.87 02/27/2001 37.87 - none 65.0634.1 JEPPSON. DAVID 90.53 50.28 40.25 02/16/2001 47.91 - none 20.0032.1 JOHNS, KENT 97.77 61.35 36.42 02/16/2001 40.25 - none 32.0616.2 JOHNSON, CONNIE JO 310.37 237.83 72.54 03/13/2001 21.3118.1 JOHNSON, MARK 111.72 71.47 40.25 02/12/2001 34.0390.2 JOHNSON, PETER 236.81 89.25 51.74 01/22/2001 41.48 - 19.1694.2 JOHNSON, WALTER 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/13/2001 34.04 - 20.1554.2 JOHNSTON, JAMES 321.23 153.57 87.66 02/09/2001 139.06 - 31.1056.3 JOHNSTON. LAMONT 88.74 59.98 28.76 02/12/2001 28.76 - 51.4290.1 JONES, BRET 224.31 117.43 106.88 02/14/2001 228.29 - none 68.0320.1 JONES, DONALD 61.35 28.76 32.59 03/15/2001 31.77 - none 22.0330.1 JONES, ELDON & LORI 143.63 95.82 47.81 03/21/2001 59.50 - none 35.1166.2 JONES, LORETTA 59.24 32.86 26.38 02/22/2001 26.38 - 35.0412.2 JORDAN, GARY & VANA 63.07 32.86 26.38 03/12/2001 56.59 - 20.0112.1 JUDY. JEAN 102.57 59.98 42.59 02/15/2001 113.09 - none 46.0840.1 JUDY. VICTOR 91.90 51.65 40.25 02/16/2001 44.08 - none 32.0522.2 JUHASZ, DON C. 188.53 123.21 65.32 04/02/2001 30.00- 50.3836.1 JULIAN, GEORGE 115.58 51.78 63.80 03/23/2001 90.60 - none 3.0110.1 KANE. KRISTOPHER & DARALlE 90.11 57.52 32.59 02/23/2001 32.59 - none 69.0750.1 KANGAS, COLLEEN 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/21/2001 28.76 - none 50.4638.1 KEENE, JAMES 79.78 50.36 29.42 03107/2001 31.00 - none 34.3190.1 KELLEY, SCOTT 96.43 66.41 30.02 03116/2001 35.00 - none 1.0870.1 KELLOGG, J.R 143.73 89.69 51.70 03/21/2001 70.00 - none 3.0286.1 KELLY, MILLICENT 86.28 57.52 28.76 02112/2001 28.76 - none 21.2602.2 KEMNITZ. HEINO 116.92 76.67 40.25 03106/2001 36.42 - 20.1942.1 KEMPER, JASON 62,791.22 62,609.60 178.13 03/19/2001 144.00 - none 21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 96.54 60.12 36.42 02/22/2001 36.42 - none 42.1176.1 KHAMPHAY, VANASOUK 99.00 58.75 40.25 02/23/2001 21.14 - none 42.2530.1 KILE R, KELLY & TAMMY 141.65 88.46 53.19 02/14/2001 105.64 - none 4.1614.1 KINCAID, GEORGE & LAURA 381.88 255.03 126.85 03/2112001 116.85 - none 50.0594.1 KINDALL, AARON & MISTIE 84.54 46.67 37.87 03119/2001 45.53 - 3.0298.1 KING. DAVID R 110.57 21.55 42.59 03116/2001 100.00 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:36am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pml Last Pmt Cust No Non-Delinq 02/28/2001 Date Msg - --- ---------- - ------- -- 74.3800.1 KING. KEVIN 102.55 49.36 53.19 03/16/2001 45.53 - none 21.1788.1 KINGMlXAY. SENGKEO 247.42 134.40 113.02 02/22/2001 97.70 - none 33.4348.1 KINGSTON, CHARLES 101.65 64.25 37.40 03/20/2001 46.00 - none 21.2090.1 KINGSTON, CHRISTIE 111.60 65.18 46.42 02/15/2001 105.43 - none 50.1242.1 KINNEY. KEVIN B. 68.29 36.70 31.59 03/20/2001 43.73 - none 3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 152.90 78.18 74.72 02/16/2001 160.11 - none 50.2116.1 KIRKMAN. T.R. & JAMIE 69.24 32.86 36.38 02/15/2001 79.14 - none 5.0426.1 KLEINSMITH, TERRY 126.76 86.51 40.25 02/09/2001 44.08 - none 42.2712.2 KNAPP, JR., JERRY 128.41 84.33 44.08 02/16/2001 46.0530.1 KNAPP, KEVIN 58.54 34.09 24.45 02/21/2001 30.00 - none 34.2128.1 KNIGHT. JON 364.61 163.97 116.81 02/14/2001 149.60 - none 32.1614.2 KOPPELMAN. GARY & KAREN 93.94 57.52 36.42 02/23/2001 26.38 - 21.0462.2 KORBER, GERALD 160.66 107.47 53.19 02/21/2001 96.67 - 20.1362.1 KUEHL HOMES. INC 79.14 52.76 26.36 02/12/2001 12.96 - 31.0628.1 KYSAR. ANITA 142.12 83.40 58.72 03/27/2001 50.00 - none 69.0532.1 LAFEVER FAMILY TRUST 39.12 18.78 11.40 01/23/2001 76.92 - none 40.0410.1 LAKATOS, JOSEPH 147.80 83.12 64.68 03/13/2001 34.04 - none 2.6030.3 LAMBERT. MARK 79.00 52.76 26.24 01/24/2001 60.56. 31.0214.1 LAMBRIGHT. ARTHUR 93.67 60.42 30.21 03/19/2001 31.00. none 19.0092.1 LAMONT OLIVER & CYNTHIA DEI 131.01 83.10 47.91 03/02/2001 40.25 - 46.0514.1 LANGE, CHARLES 79.32 39.07 40.25 03/06/2001 47.91 - none 4.1776.1 LANSING. BUD 131.98 77.90 54.08 02/14/2001 148.53 . none 42.3000.1 LARAWAY, L. CHRISTOPHER 87.51 58.75 28.76 03/20/2001 28.76 . none 32.1178.3 LARISON, ROBERT 92.00 57.96 34.04 03/07/2001 51.84. 22.0336.1 LARSON. CARl 84.87 57.52 27.35 03/19/2001 34.00 - none 33.0108.1 LARSON. TIMOTHY 55.99 05/19/2000 25.00 - none 3.0272.2 LAUFENBERG, JAMES R 91.90 52.76 26.38 12.76 02/12/2001 2.4990.1 LAUFENBERG, JIM & TAMMIE 251.15 93.52 57.02 49.36 03/21/2001 100.00 - none 50.3786.1 LAY, D TRAVIS 89.46 51.59 37.87 02/22/2001 49.36 - none 13.5100.1 LDS CHURCH 536.40 362.86 173.54 02/26/2001 168.62 - 46.0816.1 LEATHAM, JARED 77 .49 45.58 31.91 03/16/2001 40.00 - none 21.1522.2 LEE, DONALD 89.40 59.19 30.21 02/20/2001 30.21 - 22.0332.1 LEE. MICHELLE 122.20 80.50 41.70 02/13/2001 45.53 - none 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON. ELIZABETH 144.66 52.76 26.38 02/23/2001 50.00 - none 21.1480.2 LESTER, BETTE 96.28 57.52 38.76 02/15/2001 133.61 - 34.2852.1 LEVELL. SUZANNE 82.99 52.76 30.21 03/15/2001 157.00 - none 35.0306.2 LEWIS. GREGORY & ALLISON 71.82 45.44 26.38 13.2064.2 LIGGINS, ARTHUR & JOANNA 128.41 80.50 47.91 02/22/2001 40.0372.1 LINCOLN, JEFREY 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/08/2001 26.38 - none 42.0446.1 LINDQUIST. MICHAEL 128.79 83.26 45.53 02/21/2001 83.40 - none 20.1638.1 LINK. THOMAS 99.14 62.72 36.42 02/12/2001 84.33 - none 69.1098.1 LODGE, NORMAN 48.93 26.38 22.55 01/25/2001 34.04 - none 35.0140.2 LORD, WENDELL & DOLLY 111.06 39.15 34.04 01/12/2001 37.87 - 42.0550.1 LOUIES RESTAURANT 2.196.36 1.770.09 426.27 03/07/2001 7.71 - 69.0384.1 LOUNSBURY. ALAN 103.48 44.08 59.40 02/15/2001 57.02 - none 20.0132.1 LOVELAND. JAMES 141.53 82.17 59.36 02/15/2001 89.69 - 34.0600.1 LOWE. TROY & SUSAN 122.64 77.11 45.53 02/09/2001 45.53 - none 21.2636.1 LUCERO, ROBERT & TRACY 89.25 66.41 22.84 03/19/2001 50.00 - none 2.0390.1 LUKE, DANIEL 105.95 71.91 34.04 03/19/2001 41.70 - none 34.2138.1 LYCAN, JOHN 107.04 73.00 34.04 03/19/2001 37.87 - none 74.2840.1 MACHO. CRAIG & TAMMY 117.90 59.40 58.50 03/16/2001 50.00 - none 74.2614.1 MACKRILL. MICHAEL 69.01 36.42 32.59 02/22/2001 21.10 - none 74.3504.1 MADDOX. DALLAS 102.55 45.53 57.02 03/22/2001 91.06 - 33.0260.1 MAGNUSON, BOB 36.05 12/14/2000 26.38 - none 2.5940.1 MARINEAU, SHIRLEY 79.14 02/13/2001 26.38 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:36am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Deli nquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance last Pmt last Pmt Cust No Balance Non-Delinq 02/28/2001 Date Amount Msg - - - - ~ -------.-......------ 50.1636.1 MARTEll, ERIC 124.80 38.16 31.68 01/02/2001 35.88 - none 42.1950.1 MARTIN, DANIEL K. 98.86 66.27 32.59 03f20/2001 36.42 - none 2.2280.1 MASLEN, JENNY 80.37 53.99 26.38 02116/2001 26.38 " none 4.0580.2 MASON, JAMES E 86.28 57.52 28.76 03/01/2001 28.76 " 51.0514.1 MATHEWS. DONNA 59.24 32.86 26.38 03"6/2001 26.38 " none 51.0462.2 MAYES, BLAKE 341.08 53.10 287.98 04104/2001 42.00 " 74.1260.1 MAYFIELD, ROBERT & EVANGEL 52.76 26.38 26.38 04/04f2001 55.75 - none 75.0502.1 MCAlVAIN CONSTRUCTION 82.50 27.39 21.24 34.1314.1 MCARTHUR, SYMPHONI 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/20/2001 26.38 - none 32.0552.1 MCBATH, J.R 98.29 60.42 37.87 02116f2001 37.87 - none 69.2258.3 MCCANDLESS, DOUG 57.52 28.76 28.76 03/02/2001 42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & lEISA 161.51 105.94 55.57 03/20/2001 21.2772.2 MCCLURE, ANTHONY 86.28 57.52 28.76 03f14/2001 28.76 - 2.0450.1 MCCLURE. BRENT 79.14 52.76 26.38 03107/2001 26.38 - none 74.3106.1 MCCOllUM. ROBERT 52.76 26.38 26.38 02/2212001 26.38 - none 74.3208.1 MCCULLOUGH, JIM 61.35 28.76 32.59 02/13/2001 65.18 - none 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 86.28 57.52 28.76 0211212001 122.42 - 2.2586.1 MCCURRY, ARTHUR 71.59 25.38 10/12/2000 58.36 - none 31.3474.1 MCDONALD, SHAWN 88.08 57.82 30.21 .05 03/06/2001 26.00 - none 1.0090.2 MCFADDEN, ClEORA 88.74 59.98 28.76 03/08/2001 1.0080.1 MCFADDEN, ClEORA 81.60 55.22 26.38 03/06/2001 73.53 - none 68.0098.1 MCGilVERY. BELINDA 90.50 32.59 57.91 03/29/2001 59.40 - none 31.3242.1 MCGOWAN, DAVID E. 98.15 64.11 34.04 03/20/2001 34.04 - none 3.0504.4 MCKINLEY, JUNE 90.35 63.97 26.38 74.1104.7 MCKINLEY, JUNE 60.42 34.04 26.38 46.0558.2 MCKNIGHT. DANIEL 64.72 37.92 26.80 03f19/2001 60.00 - 50.2126.1 MCMAHAN, BRIAN 86.51 54.21 32.30 03/15/2001 31.74-none 2.4500.1 MCNETT, DARREN 91.86 57.82 34.04 03101/2001 30.21 " none 50.2444.1 MCNITT, STEVE & TRACY 63.59 35.24 28.35 03/19/2001 33.00 " none 20.1698.1 MEACHAM, MICHAEL L. 133.28 65.20 34.04 02/13/2001 26.38 - none 74.2636.1 MEAD, CHRIS 71.91 37.87 34.04 03/19/2001 34.04 " none 69.2282.1 MEFFORD, CLIFFORD 178.20 44.08 67.06 02/13/2001 67.06 " none 34.0968.2 MEHOlCHICK. VICKY 151.76 93.22 58.54 03/23/2001 21.1132.1 MELTON, GARY 110.49 74.07 36.42 04/0212001 40.25 - none 19.6604.1 MELTON, MARSHAL 99.52 65.48 34.04 02/14/2001 37.87 - none 22.1582.1 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 550.09 367.84 182.25 02/15/2001 178.42 - none 52.1100.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 1.525.62 8.94 16.88 16.88 1.482.92 09/25/2000 725.50 " none 52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDW A Y 6.606.17 27.39 6.48 16.88 6.555.42 09/25/2000 1,711.33 " none 1.0980.1 MERIDIAN-SENIOR CITIZENS 590.38 399.21 191.17 02113/2001 195.00 - none 21.0164.1 METCALF, CHAD 160.08 97.05 63.03 03/20/2001 53.00 - none 21.0094.1 METIVIER, JAMES 210.12 26.99 40.25 11/29/2000 40.00 - none 2.2030.1 MEYER, VIRGINIA 71.52 50.76 20.76 03/16/2001 30.00 - none 50.3848.1 MEYERS, DAN 75.65 41.61 34.04 03/20/2001 40.74 - none 33.7616.1 MICHAELSON, BRADLEY 97.83 57.97 36.03 03/12/2001 32.20 " none 19.1708.2 MICHAS, JAMES 129.64 85.56 44.08 0310212001 44.08 - 46.4484.1 MICRON TECHNOLOGY 819.99 421.63 398.36 02/12/2001 340.91 - none 2.6050.1 MIDDLEBROOK, JOYCE 142.91 68.24 39.25 01/2212001 39.25 - none 74.3696.1 MillER, GREGORY & ERICA 62.48 34.04 28.44 02/13/2001 130.00 - 34.1964.2 MillER, RICKEY 108.41 70.54 37.87 03/19/2001 37.87 - 42.1146.2 MillER, WADE 124.72 76.81 47.91 02/13/2001 40.25- 46.0406.1 MillS. TIMOTHY 75.65 45.44 30.21 03/09/2001 75.74 - none 74.3630.1 MINK, TAYLOR 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/13/2001 28.76 - none 64.4070.2 MITCHEll, RANDY 122.14 56.57 65.57 02/21 f2001 50.00 - 21.2820.1 MOGEL, BRYAN 105.03 66.27 38.76 02/14/2001 86.28 - none 20.1652.2 MOlEBASH. JOHN & MONICA 126.33 84.63 41.70 03/19/2001 ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be senl i /~ ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page; 11 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10;36am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Balance Non.Delinq Date Amount Msg - - -............-- ---- 34.1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 79.41 53.99 25.42 0311612001 27.00 - none 2.3742.1 MONTGOMERY, DENNIS 168.17 80.94 37.87 02/13/2001 98.44 - none 46.0222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & LISA 150.07 108.37 41.70 03120/2001 36.50 . none 32.0816.1 MOORE, RICK T. 108.41 70.54 37.87 03/07/2001 75.74. none 14.4430.2 MOORE, SCOTT & CHRISTY 100.23 67.64 32.59 02/22/2001 32.36 - 3.0380.1 MOORE, WILLIAM & JENNIFER 131.96 84.05 47.91 02/1312001 40.25 - none 31.1264.1 MORGAN. BRENT & JEAN 95.55 69.17 26.38 02/23/2001 45.53 - none 32.0806.2 MORGAN, CHARLES 120.04 70.68 49.36 02/09/2001 34.04 - 2.4400.2 MORGAN, FRANK 91.86 61.65 30.21 03102/2001 30.21 - 2.5630.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 219.34 139.34 80.00 02/1312001 147.74 - none 21.3296.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE & VICKI 117.44 79.57 37.87 02/12/2001 91.06 - none 32.0654.1 MORRISON, MICHAEL & BENICIA 196.50 127.99 68.51 03/19/2001 61.40 - none 69.0480.1 MORTENSEN, DAVID 65.18 32.59 32.59 02/23/2001 32.59 - none 74.2666.1 MOSER. CAROLYN 99.65 44.08 55.57 03/20/2001 78.55 - none 50.4016.2 MOULTON, CHAD 125.20 28.76 28.76 28.76 12/2112000 65.00 - 19.0046.1 MOWREY, ROBERT 90.11 28.76 28.76 32.59 01/1012001 32.59 - none 4.1574.2 MULLINS, ROBERT 93.03 70.54 22.49 21.1068.1 MURRAY, JOHN 82.97 56.59 26.38 02/12/2001 60.34 - none 51 .0482.1 MURRAY. SONORA MURRAY 79.48 41.61 37.87 02/16/2001 64.25 - none 50.0262.1 MURRI. SCOTT 67.17 35.32 31.85 02/05/2001 71.77 - none 51.0450.1 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS 160.32 84.88 75.44 02/14/2001 196.32 - none 42.3088.2 NASH, TIM & JOCELYN 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/2712001 26.38 - 31.0508.2 NELSON JOHN H. 79.14 52.76 26.38 03102/2001 30.21 - 51.4110.2 NESMITH, STEVE 242.56 32.86 91.49 03121/2001 100.00 - 1 .3200.1 NEWKIRK, MARYANN 79.14 52.76 26.38 02121/2001 26.38 - none 50.1228.1 NGUYEN. HUONG 59.24 32.86 26.38 02/22/2001 26.38 - none 2.5930.1 NIBLETT, JOSEPH L 107.18 69.31 37.87 02/13/2001 37.87 " none 42.2704.1 NICKELL, TROY 104.06 67.64 36.42 02/22/2001 36.42 - none 21.0170.1 NIELSEN, BRIAN 229.22 143.01 86.21 03/1912001 93.87 - none 31.0726.1 NITZ, JASON 95.69 57.82 37.87 0211412001 141.02 - none 4.2294.2 NOBLE, ROBERT 124.44 76.53 47.91 03/09/2001 47.97 - 50.1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 178.03 127.53 50.50 03/20/2001 94.13 - none 50.1460.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 1.085.83 287.20 290.72 194.97 06/20/2000 69.68 - none 50.1456.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEf 381.11 133.13 136.91 111.Q7 03/20/2001 136.91 - none 35.0228.1 OASIS CONSTRUCTION 100.97 49.27 51.70 02/1412001 127.58 - 50.0772.2 OLlVEDALE HOMES, VERLA J C~ 413.04 368.04 45.00 0311912001 438.99 - 74.1468.1 OLMSTEAD FAMILY TRUST 83.76 08/11/2000 19.00 " none 31.1014.1 OMSIRISACK, SAMAY 319.91 165.99 90.04 0310212001 112.37 " none 34.2134.3 OPAL BLUME TRUST 103.35 65.48 37.87 03/15/2001 .04- 35.1030.1 ORION SORENSEN 79.72 34.09 30.21 12/13/2000 3.67 - 50.1918.1 OSTERHOUT, JUSTIN 112.40 41.53 70.87 03/15/2001 13.2094.2 OVERY, ROBBY 332.14 74.37 41.70 04/12/2001 57.87 - 20.2044.3 OWENS. CHRISTOPHER 80.37 53.99 26.38 03102/2001 52.76 - 33.2320.2 OZUNA, MARIO 209.81 125.95 83.83 03/22/2001 20.82- 22.0454.1 P. JANSSON, JANIE 155.22 99.65 55.57 0212312001 55.57 - none 31.3284.2 PACE, ALAN 92.92 67.80 25.12 0310912001 41.70 - 74.2968.1 PACKARD, MICHAEL & SUZANNE 84.33 44.08 40.25 02/20/2001 44.08 - none 22.1540.1 PAGE, ALAN & MARCELLA 201.04 141.64 59.40 02/26/2001 74.72 - none 65.0224.1 PAGET, ROOME 69.36 39.15 30.21 02116/2001 71.91 - none 50.4614.2 PAISANO ITALLIAN RESTURANT 555.29 266.97 288.32 02/23/2001 479.82 - 74.0358.5 PALLlSTER. J.L. & CHRISTY 52.76 26.38 26.38 02/2712001 30.21 - 21.2114.2 PALMER, PAT 96.26 57.52 36.76 02/1612001 89.97 - 42.2376.1 PALMER, ROBERT 121.13 83.26 37.87 0212612001 36.91 - none 69.1272.1 PANGBORN, JACK 66.26 28.76 28.76 01/10/2001 28.76 - none 64.3050.1 PARRISH, MARTIN 96.03 50.50 45.53 03/06/2001 41.70 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:36am Current Period: 0413012001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Non-Delinq Date Amount Msg ~----- 74.3044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 88.16 44.08 44.08 03/15/2001 44.08 - none 20.0102.1 PARTON, ROSS 105.43 69.01 36.42 03/06/2001 36.42 - none 20.0104.1 PATCHIN, ROBERT 115.04 57.52 28.76 01126/2001 61.21 - none 2.2490.2 PATTERSON, DEENA L 79.14 52.76 26.38 02116/2001 86.92 - 46.0506.2 PECHT, BRYAN 66.46 37.70 28.76 03/14/2001 36.42- 32.0438.1 PECKHAM, ROY 117.44 75.74 41.70 02120/2001 37.87 - none 7.5000.1 PEREGRINE ELEM. SCHOOL 2.311.59 1,547.96 763.63 02115/2001 763.63 - 19.1620.2 PERKINS REVOC TRUST 35.24 6.48 28.76 02113/2001 32.59 - 51.0746.3 PERKINS. CHARLES 69.24 32.86 36.38 02114/2001 86.94 - 69.0214.1 PERRY, DAN & LORI 91.06 49.36 41.70 0310212001 57.02 - none 34.2724.1 PERRY, KELLY 121.27 75.74 45.53 0210912001 41.70 - none 42.2562.1 PETERSON, PAUL & KARISSA 103.42 63.81 39.61 0211512001 33.00 - none 42.2766.1 PETERSON, TAMI 80.37 53.99 26.38 02126/2001 30.21 - none 55.1500.1 PETRA INC 187.00 69.95 45.41 34.1560.1 PHILP, HAROLD 112.10 78.06 34.04 02/08/2001 78.08 - none 22.1526.1 PIERCE, TANYA 86.28 57.52 28.76 03/02/2001 28.76 - none 42.0348.1 PIPAL. RANDALL & JULIE 98.72 66.13 32.59 03109/2001 65.18 - none 1.0316.1 PIPCO LLC 187.66 106.04 53.02 01/1912001 50.64 - 19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 96.28 57.52 38.76 03121/2001 28.76 - none 34.0832.1 PLETCHER, MICHAEL R 96.68 52.76 26.38 01112/2001 26.38 - none 22.0868.1 POLLARD, RONALD 159.05 107.31 51.74 02/12/2001 118.80 - none 3.0366.1 POND. ROB & NANCY 90.11 57.52 32.59 02/21/2001 28.76 - none 19.0240.1 PONZETTI, JAMES 158.28 52.76 26.38 26.38 11/21/2000 26.38 - none 21.1942.1 POOL, JAMES H. 86.00 28.76 28.76 28.48 02105/2001 75.00 - none 69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 68.08 30.21 37.87 03/02/2001 31.53 - none 68.0260.1 POTTER, JERRY 88.16 44.08 44.08 02/1312001 44.08 - none 50.4814.1 PREMIER GROUP INC 65.72 32.86 26.38 02101/2001 6.48 - 34.1940.2 PRESLEY. TROY & ALLISON 102.12 64.25 37.87 03/06/2001 34.04- 21.2990.4 PRICE, HUBERT 102.12 64.25 37.87 02/26/2001 71.91 - 7.0248.1 PRICE, RICHARD 110.49 70.24 40.25 03/16/2001 74.07 - none 74.3418.2 PRINDLE, SHELLY 85.18 28.76 56.42 03/16/2001 2.4930.3 PROCTOR. KRISTIE 79.14 52.76 26.38 4.2248.2 PUCKETT, RUSSELL 143.65 89.39 54.26 03/1412001 74.3066.1 PUGSLEY, TAMARA 114.97 51.74 63.23 03/1312001 59.40 - none 46.0322.1 QUATTLEBAUM, JAMES & BARB, 178.49 10102/2000 65.49 - none 32.1106.1 RADKO. MICHAEL A. 95.83 65.62 30.21 02113/2001 37.87 - none 19.0220.1 RADY, STEVE 100.25 70.68 29.57 03/19/2001 50.00 - none 52.1002.1 RAFANELLI & NAHAS 1.417.69 808.68 609.01 03/26/2001 619.90 - none 52.1006.1 RAFANELLI & NAHAS 194.99 113.55 81.44 03/2612001 85.27 - none 2.5670.1 RANSOM, JAMES R. 26,110.59 26,061.23 49.36 03/29/2001 74.65 - none 46.0864.1 RASMUSSEN, RONALD 74.12 41.53 32.59 03/19/2001 36.42 - none 2.2580.1 REED, DEBORAH 84.85 55.22 29.63 03/22/2001 61.00 - none 65.0268.1 REMAX CAPITAL CITY 134.98 32.86 26.38 12/1312000 39.10 - none 33.2644.1 RHEAD, ROBERT 86.28 57.52 28.76 0311612001 28.76 - none 32.1694.1 RICE, E. DONALD 118.54 75.88 42.66 03119/2001 50.00 - none 72.0146.1 RICE, RALPH & SUSAN 67.26 32.59 34.67 03122/2001 42.00 - none 34.1694.1 RIDGEWAY, STEPHAN 133.99 80.80 53.19 02/21/2001 102.55 - none 34.0786.1 RILEY, MARK 246.57 132.10 114.47 03/21/2001 72.34 - none 42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 114.67 70.10 44.08 03122/2001 134.00 - none 75.0112.1 ROARING SPRINGS WATER PAF 358.40 179.20 179.20 02109/2001 179.20 - 51 .3300.1 ROBERTS. DAVID 59.24 32.86 26.38 02107/2001 89.14 - none 69.0684.1 ROBERTS, KENNETH & RHONDt 6M2 30.21 30.21 02/13/2001 34.04 - none 3.0848.1 ROBERTS. TODD 100.75 66.71 34.04 03/19/2001 37.87 - none 5.0164.1 ROBINSON, CAL & COLLEEN 93.94 61.35 32.59 03109/2001 40.25 - none 50.4534.1 ROCKE, SEAN 59.24 32.86 26.38 0211212001 26.38 - none ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 13 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:37am Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Non-Delinq 01/31/2001 Date Amount Msg ------------- - --- - --- ROGERS, DUKE & SHERI 126.90 74.07 51.74 02/08/2001 47.91 - none 74.3090.1 ROGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/21/2001 28.76 - none 69.1614.1 ROHM, FRANK 57.52 28.76 28.76 03[16/2001 51.48 - none 65.0454.1 ROHM, RODNEY 69.24 32.86 36.38 03/20[2001 26.38 - none 4.1264.2 ROSCHECK. PAMELA 80.37 53.99 26.38 02112/2001 42.2404.1 ROSE, PHOEBE 78.90 52.76 26.14 02/02/2001 50.00 - none 4.1694.2 ROSSl. SHANNON 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/26/2001 26.38 - 35.0058.2 ROWETT, BOB & DANA 69.06 36.47 32.59 03/19[2001 32.59 - 34.2840.1 ROWLES, JOHN 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/12/2001 26.38 - none 52.0316.1 RT NAHAS CO 651.91 403.91 248.00 03[23[2001 372.92 . none 22.2146.2 RUEPPEL, RONALD 120.75 80.50 40.25 02/13/2001 15.63 - 22.2168.1 RULE, ROBERT & CAREY 107.18 69.31 37.87 02/13/2001 45.53 - 50.0090.1 SABA, VIRGINA 78.25 44.21 34.04 03/12/2001 33.47 - none 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 100.89 63.02 37.87 02/26/2001 54.04 - 69.1080.2 SALSBURY, WAYNE 57.52 28.76 28.76 02/12/2001 28.76. 74.3710.1 SANDOVAL, WALTER & MIREYA 102.45 26.38 26.38 26.38 04/09[2001 26.38 - 51.1129.1 SANTEE CONSTRUCTION 364.88 37.00 163.94 163.94 01 [19/2001 207.99 - 33.2324.2 SAUNDERS, KELLEY 7,872.57 7,842.36 30.21 03[02/2001 26.38 - 34.1078.2 SAVELBERG, DOYLE 324.12 65.62 26.38 10/19/2000 50.00 - 2.5680.1 SAXTON, CORY 112.10 74.23 37.87 02/14[2001 77.37 " none 22.1386.1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 119.70 75.44 44.08 03[19/2001 39.00 - none 19.7182.1 SCHNUR, CRAIG 226.76 148.21 78.55 02/22/2001 78.55 - none 4.1196.1 SCHOENFELD, DEAN 92.57 59.98 32.59 02/22/2001 28.76 " none 34.2144.1 SCHRANK. THOMAS A 132.90 87.37 45.53 03[26/2001 64.68 - none 14.4312.1 SCHROEDER ENT INC 92.10 52.76 26.38 32.0622.3 SCHUSTER, BILL & LESLIE 140.42 94.89 45.53 04/06[2001 74.3198.1 SCOWN, JENNY LEE 62.28 31.14 31.14 02/12/2001 20.1350.2 SCREBNER, WENDY KAY 95.69 65.48 30.21 02/14/2001 26.38 - 1.1915.1 SEABURY 316.18 08/24[2000 52.78 - 3.0676.1 SECO ASSOCIATES INC 181.30 147.54 16.88 01 [1 9/2001 16.88 - none 69.2262.1 SEDILLO, JOE 102.55 41.70 60.85 03/21/2001 144.94 - none 32.1578.1 SELDIN JR. STEVEN 113.44 56.59 56.85 12/27/2000 86.97 - none 42.2278.1 SHAFFER, CINDY 148.76 90.48 58.28 03/08[2001 60.00 - none 2.0760.4 SHEHEE, SHANNON 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/15[2001 20.42 - 74.0322.2 SHELDON. PAM 60.84 26.38 30.21 4.25 03[28/2001 50.00 - 74.3242.1 SHELTROWN, ROGER 121.31 74.72 28.76 17.83 03[16/2001 51.18-none 74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 82.24 40.25 41.99 03/16/2001 50.00 - none 74.2758.1 SHIELDS, JOHNNY 35.53 2.38 2.38 03107/2001 50.00 - none 4.1878.2 SHIRLEY. GARRY 137.16 89.25 47.91 03/12/2001 47.91 - 46.5002.1 SHOPKO STORES IN #169 1,388.96 1,125.56 263.40 04/02/2001 881.93 - 74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 91.99 44.08 47.91 02/16[2001 36.42 - none 2.2500.1 SILVA, JOSEPH 227.14 143.31 83.83 03/19[2001 80.00 - none 69.1292.3 SIMMONS. BRETT 56.59 26.38 30.21 02/22/2001 4.1832.1 SIMMONS, JOHN & JANA 104.06 71.47 32.59 03/19/2001 40.25 - none 32.1638.1 SIMPSON, BRETT & LISA 67.46 62.58 24.88 03/26[2001 36.42 - none 22.1504.1 SIMPSON, RANDY 95.17 62.58 32.59 03/13/2001 21.2836.2 SINGLETON. RODNEY 113.66 71.17 42.49 03/21/2001 76.25 - 2.0426.1 SKENE, JAMES 139.76 73.83 25.72 03/26/2001 50.00 - none 2.1700.2 SMITH, LEON & JANI CE 131.25 104.87 26.38 03/20/2001 75.43 - 72.0266.1 SOMAZZI, ROGER 50.61 28.76 21.85 03/15[2001 35.00 - none 42.1994.1 SPEER, GEORGE 90.42 66.41 24.01 03[22/2001 45.00 - none 31.0874.1 SPELLMAN, EDWARD E. 109.78 68.08 41.70 03[21/2001 45.53 - none 21.0248.1 SPENCER. JAN 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/16/2001 52.00 - none 50.1254.1 SPENCER, ROBERT & CAROLL 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/07/2001 26.38 - none 20.2999.1 SPRINKLER - BRENDA ESTATES 68.32 ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List. council Page: 14 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:37am Current Period: 0413012001 Delinquenl Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Non-Delinq 01131/2001 Date Msg .......----.--. - - - ~ - -- 3.0644.1 STAMMERJOHN, JIMMY 86.26 57.52 28.76 02/1312001 86.28 . none 4.1564.1 STANFIELD, ROBERT 86.26 57.52 28.76 03106/2001 28.76 . none 21.0502.1 STANPHILL, CYNTHIA 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/26/2001 32.59 - none 40.0162.1 STASTNY, MARK 94.46 60.42 34.04 02/15/2001 30.21 - none 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 79.24 52.76 26.38 .10 02/2312001 26.28 - none 22.1048.1 STEINER. THURSTON 200.77 104.65 59.40 36.52 0410512001 106.00 . none 51 .3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 305.59 305.59 35.0194.3 STOCKWELL. CHRISTOPHER 112.00 32.86 26.38 26.38 21.0152.2 STODDARD, NORMAN 159.05 103.46 55.57 02/0512001 153.99 . 65.0376.2 STOKES. RON 66.90 40.52 26.38 02/2612001 52.76 - 34.1800.1 STONER, JERRY 94.83 69.09 25.74 03121/2001 50.00 - none 19.0502.2 STUART, NEAL 123.92 32.66 45.53 02/09/2001 45.53 - 2.5500.1 STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTIOI\ 156.26 105.52 52.76 02/14/2001 52.76 - none 50.3882.1 SUTHERlAND, FRANZ 89.60 51.73 37.87 02/13/2001 83.40 - none 31.3466.2 SUTTON Ill. DONALD 137.00 77.11 59.89 03/22/2001 55.00 - 46.0626.1 SWARTZ, GUY 64.00 35.24 28.76 02/0612001 28.76 - none 74.2346.1 SWEET, WILLIAM 34.09 34.09 10/12/2000 25.31 - none 51.0906.1 TAGGART, RETA 76.74 50.36 26.36 03/06/2001 26.38 - none 21.1168.1 TALBOT, PORTER 246.23 162.02 74.72 02/13/2001 111.14 - none 21.0558.1 T ALLADA, RICHARD 94.46 60.42 34.04 02/16/2001 37.67 - none 74.2698.2 TAYLOR. DARRELL 55.52 26.38 26.38 02/1312001 50.00 - 42.2134.1 TAYLOR, ERIC 102.83 62.56 40.25 02/13/2001 36.42 - none 3.0418.1 TEAGUE, RON & JANET 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/2012001 26.38 - none 21.1084.1 TEASLEY. RICHARD & LINDA 62.97 52.76 30.21 03119/2001 26.38 - none 20.1964.1 TECO INVESTMENTS 86.28 57.52 28.76 02/09/2001 96.28 - none 33.0056.1 TEL.CAR INC 202.74 155.20 47.54 03/20/2001 100.00 - none 2.1190.1 TERRELL. A 150.12 100.76 49.36 02/08/2001 93.40 - none 22.1004.1 THACKER, BRUCE J 203.78 136.72 67.06 02115/2001 78.55 - none 74.1114.1 THATCHER. TIMOTHY 410.14 311.42 49.36 49.36 0212312001 221 .52 - none 69.0752.2 THE GREEN FAMILY TRUST 138.05 26.38 26.38 26.38 11/1712000 41.14- 54.0012.1 THE PLAYGROUND 460.93 251.78 209.15 03101/2001 251 .28 - none 54.0014.1 THE PLAYGROUND 558.51 266.55 269.96 03101/2001 281.45 - none 54.0016.1 THE PlAYGROUND 333.36 140.16 193.20 03101/2001 99.58 - none 54.0018.1 THE PlAYGROUND 241 .44 140.16 101.28 12120/2000 101.28 . none 32.1654.1 THIELE. STEPHEN 171.06 106.36 64.68 0311512001 57.02 . none 1.3490.1 THIEMANN, ERIC 125.10 79.57 45.53 0312112001 87.28 - none 4.1400.1 THIES, GREGORY 87.51 58.75 28.76 03/0612001 28.76 - none 22.1032.1 THOMPSON. REN 165.00 130.96 34.04 0210612001 64.25 - none 50.2110.2 THOMPSON, RHONDA 88.25 40.38 47.87 02114/2001 109.78 - 22.1098.1 THORMAHLEN, SHANNON 330.61 183.12 141.28 04102/2001 100.00. none 3.0420.1 THURBER, RICHARD 107.16 70.24 36.92 03108/2001 100.00 - none 21.2736.1 THURBER, RICK 71.48 51.00 20.48 03112/2001 35.00 . none 21.2732.3 THURBER, RONALD 218.20 62.58 32.59 02/27/2001 100.00 - 4.0936.1 TIMM, SEAN 97.77 65.18 32.59 02/22/2001 32.59 - none 74.3704.1 TORRES, GLORIA 57.52 28.76 28.76 02108/2001 50.19 - 20.1492.1 TRAMPLEASURE, DENNIS 133.85 94.45 39.40 02/1212001 180.00 - none 2.3510.1 TRAVIS. HANSEN 89.95 60.74 29.21 02/22/2001 25.38 - none 50.0232.2 TUCKER, LEVI & ABIGAIL 59.24 32.86 26.38 14.5006.1 TURNER, DAVE 140.61 90.32 50.29 02126/2001 49.83 - 51 .0302.4 TWOMEY, MATTHEW 59.24 32.86 26.38 03/20/2001 26.38 . 34.2104.1 TYLER. HEIDI 137.39 65.48 37.87 03/2212001 37.87 . none 46.4660.1 US FILTER 359.29 191.30 167.99 03/1312001 335.98 . none 74.2876.1 USSERY. TRACY 140.29 67.06 63.23 10.00 03/2112001 55.57 - none 35.0070.1 VAL HARRIS 158.45 45.36 36.42 40.25 36.42 1212112000 76.81 - 51.2996.1 VALlA. CAROLYN 394.06 394.06 07111/2000 24.08 - none no in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 15 Standard Payment Customers Apr 17,2001 10:37am Current Period: 0413012001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Non-Delinq 0212812001 01131/2001 12131/2000 Date Amount Msg - -----.-.-.....-.~- ---- 20.3056.1 VALLI BUilDERS 79.14 52.76 26.38 0212212001 6,48 . 22.0192.2 VAN BLANKENSTEIN, IAN 84.11 57.52 26.59 0311912001 15.00 - 19.1120.1 VAN ORE, ANDREW 86.28 57.52 28.76 0211612001 36,42 - none 22.1052.1 VANHORN, KEVIN & SANDRA 115.04 28.76 28.76 01124/2001 44.08 - none 42.3968.1 VANHOUTEN. MIKE 86.28 57.52 28.76 0212212001 57.52 - none 47.0034.1 VEASY, PATRICK & ANGELA 108.15 57.86 50.29 0212212001 108.24 - none 21.1032.1 VELADA, FEDERICO 10,479.71 10,447.12 32.59 02123/2001 109.12 - none 2.0466.1 VICK, WILLIAM & KELLY 122.50 80.80 41.70 03/19/2001 45.53 - none 5.0696.1 VIGIL, THOMAS 463.28 197.13 11/03/2000 88.34 - none 50.3742.2 VNUK. JOHN 335.52 118.30 160.43 02107/2001 102.97 - 1,4689.1 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 175.59 117.00 58.59 03/1612001 117.00 - none 21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 124.58 80.50 44.08 02/22/2001 40.25 - none 1.2310.2 WALKER, BETTE 150.16 102.25 47.91 0312012001 53.00 - 20.1392.1 WALKER. DAVID 141.13 89.39 51.74 0212712001 47.91 - none 20.0126.1 WALLACE, CRAIG & KRISTINE 108.55 66.85 41,70 02123/2001 79.57 - none 69.0090.1 WALLACE, MICHAEL 83.40 41.70 41.70 02108/2001 75.74 - none 46.6000.2 WALMART STORE 01.2862 3,659.87 3,305.11 354.76 03/23/2001 4,648.92 - 46.0860.2 WALMER, TAMMY JO 61.91 35.24 26.67 02114/2001 20.00 - 32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CARA 103.44 66.41 32.59 03/23/2001 62.79 - 1.3340.1 WALSH, RON 165.69 10/15/1999 34.0468.3 WALSH. RON 110.67 55.36 41.70 13.61 51.3034.1 WALT MORROW 353.37 148.97 84.13 100.83 74.3426.1 WARDEN, CAROL YNE 52.76 26.38 26.38 02126/2001 2.0484.1 WARE, RANDY 229.74 161.23 68.51 02/12/2001 68.51 - none 68.0036.1 WARNER, ERIC 75.88 32.59 43.29 03/2012001 48.00 - none 34.0724.2 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 547.45 26.38 36.38 10/3012000 164.77 . 50.0638.1 WASHINGTON SQUARE APARU 482.88 280.32 202.56 0311512001 202.56 - none 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 124.04 89.39 34.65 0311312001 75.00 . none 32.0440.1 WATSON, BRAD 103.35 65.48 37.87 02126/2001 41.70. none 74.3052.1 WATSON. JASON 80.50 36,42 44.08 02109/2001 83.30 - none 31.2230.1 WATTERS, TAMI 99,00 70.24 28.76 03/21/2001 22.77 - none 2.6080.1 WEBB. GERALD 86.27 58.75 27.52 02122/2001 30.00 - none 74.3544.2 WEBBER, DAVID 56.59 26.38 30,21 02126/2001 26.38 - 22.0946.1 WEBSTER, RICHARD & KATHY 141.13 93.22 47.91 02113/2001 44.08 - none 72.0156.1 WElL, DAVID 130.29 67.06 63.23 0212212001 70.89 - none 3.9869.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 437.96 437.96 10/30/2000 383.94 - 51.3098.3 WERRY, GREYSON 186.35 33.90 27.09 124.36 12104/2000 60.00 - 51.1134.1 WES WORCESTER 71.32 23.36 16.88 16.88 14,20 12104/2000 12.96 - 22.1038.2 WESCOTT, SUSAN 104.53 57.52 47.01 03/26/2001 20.09 - 2.2568.1 WEST, J DAVID 104.58 62.88 41.70 02109/2001 37.87 - none 2.5710.1 WESTCOTT, RICHARD G 79.14 52.76 26.38 02106/2001 52.76 - none 75.0500.2 WESTERN ELECTRONICS 415.95 233.58 182.37 4.1380.1 WESTROCK HOMES INC 95.34 52.76 26.38 2.0978.1 WHALEY, DAVID 96.92 59.05 37.87 02106/2001 56.59 . none 43.0062.2 WHEATLEY, JAMES & JANITA 64.30 34.09 30.21 02109/2001 30.21. 22.1216.1 WHElLER, ROBERT 110.37 80.80 29.57 03/20/2001 50.00 . none 7.0898.1 WHIPPLE, KELVIN 100.23 63.81 36.42 02109/2001 43.62 - none 32.1404,1 WHITE, ALAN & SHARON 143.02 89.83 53.19 03/23/2001 45.53 - none 2.1370.1 WHITE, DEBRA LYNN 106.10 78.20 27.90 03/20/2001 60.00 - none 74.3088.1 WHITE, PHILIP 69.01 32.59 36,42 0212312001 32.59 - none 4.0922.1 WHITING, BRENT & LYNETTE 106.66 70.24 36,42 0211312001 83.04 - none 35.0097.2 WHITTED. NEIL & CHRISTINE 56.50 35.32 21.18 0311612001 61.79. 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 696.82 376.98 319.84 03/1912001 662.66 - none 21.2172.2 WilL ANDERSON 87.51 58.75 28.76 02/1212001 28.76 - 13.2032.2 WILLIAM TYDINGS 83.74 55.37 28.37 02/1612001 85.25 - u, in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 04/30/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Page: 16 Apr 17,2001 10:37am Non.Delinq Last Pmt Last Pmt Date Amount Msg 2.2040.1 WILLIAMS. FRED 86.66 56,45 30.21 02/13/2001 66.59 - none 2.4310.1 WILSON, DENNIS K 79.14 52.76 26.38 02/05/2001 66.59 - none 74.0094.3 WINWOOD, RANDY & CATHY 99.04 60.85 36.19 03/22/2001 30.00 - 4.0896.1 WITHERELL, ROBERT 79.14 52.76 26.38 03/12/2001 26.38 - none 50.1666.1 WOLFE, NELLIE 32.86 6,48 11/17/2000 26.38 . none 19.0332.2 WOOD. RICHARD 118.87 57.52 28.76 01/10/2001 28.76 - 13.2072.1 WOODHOUSE, PETER 110.49 70.24 40.25 03/12/2001 76.67 - none 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 198.75 85.12 46.46 02/27/2001 50.00. none 22.1518.1 WOOSLEY, JAMES 20.911.44 20,867.36 44.08 03/19/2001 47.91. none 22.0814.1 YELVERTON, MARC 117.20 78.18 39.02 03/19/2001 65.00 - none 2.0680.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 102.24 71.04 31.20 03102/2001 45.53 - none 22.1332.1 YOUNG, BARRY R. 128.13 88.30 39.83 02/15/2001 57.02 - none 50.3740.1 YOUNG, DARON 100.18 36.55 30.21 02/12/2001 27.00 - none 7.0960.1 YOUNG, LESLIE 137.30 93.22 44.08 03/12/2001 44.08 - none 34.2766.1 YOUNG, TOM 135.20 82.03 53.17 02/13/2001 80.00 - none 50.4008.1 YOUNGBLOOD, JON 274.25 94.67 179.58 03/20/2001 129.79 - none ------ Grand Totals: 506,468.05 432,973.96 48,305.33 6,468.26 18,720.50 ~------- - -............... ~- Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cusl No;: (<) 9900000 ... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent J: I- ~ ~ g t) o ~ ~ :r ..J ~ ~ ~ ~ '<t I'- 0 CO '<t N '<t CO 0) ..J ~ g I I- Z o ~ ~ I I- 0::: f2 LL LL o Z ~ ~ (J) W ~