HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-08-23 ACHD Development Services Department
ACHD
&111v�'�vt/�ii Piw to ,]'e/L ciei
Project/File: BridgetowerApartments/ MER21-0140/ H2O22-0047
This is a conditional use permit application to allow for the development of a multifamily
development consisting of 235 units on 16.6 acres.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Vicinity Map
Site address: W McMillan Road
Staff Approval: August 5t" 2022
Applicant: Brad Watson
Alpha Development Group
166E 14000 S, Suite 110 r,_
Draper, UT 84020
Staff Contact: Kelly Bruner Yux k.
Phone: 387-6132
E-mail: kbruner(a)achdidaho.org - -
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: This is a conditional use permit application to allow for the
development of a multifamily development consisting of 235 units on 16.6 acres.
The applicant's proposal is consistent with the City of Meridian's future land use map, which
designates this area as Mixed Use Community.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction I Land Use Zoning
North Mixed Use Community R-8: Medium Density Residential
South Medium Density Residential R-8: Medium Density Residential
East Mixed Use Community C-G: General Service and Retail
West Medium Density Residential R-4: Medium-Low Density Residential
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the
site:
• Vicenza North Subdivision, a residential development for 183 lots on 57 acres north of the site
was approved by ACHD on December 9t", 2020.
5. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site.
1 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
6. Pathway Crossings: United States Access Board R304.5.1.2 Shared Use Paths. In shared use
paths, the width of curb ramps runs and blended transitions shall be equal to the width of the shared
use path.
AASHTO's Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities 5.3.5 Other Intersection
Treatments: The opening of a shared use path at the roadway should be at least the same width
as the shared use path itself. If a curb ramp is provided, the ramp should be the full width of the
path, not including any flared sides if utilized. . . . Detectable warnings should be placed across the
full width of the ramp.
FHWA's "Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access" (1999) reflected common ADA-related
concepts: Chapter 6, Page 16-6: The width of the ramp should be at least as wide as the average
width of the trail to improve safety for users who will be traveling at various speeds. In addition, the
overall width of the trail should be increased, so the curb ramp can be slightly offset to the side.
The increased width reduces conflict at the intersection by providing more space for users at the
bottom of the ramp.
7. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 0 centerline miles of new public
road.
8. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building
permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
9. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP):
• McMillan Road is scheduled in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Black Cat Road to Linder
Road between 2031-2035.
10. Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan: ACHD's Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan (BMP) was
adopted by the ACHD Commission in May of 2009 and was update in 2018. The plan seeks to
implement the Planned Bicycle Network to support bicycling as a viable transportation option for
Ada County residents with a wide range of ages and abilities, maintain bicycle routes in a state of
good repair in order to ensure they are consistently available for use, promote awareness of existing
bicycle routes and features and support encouragement programs and to facilitate coordination and
cooperation among local jurisdictions in implementing the Roadways to Bikeways Plan
recommendations.
The BMP identifies McMillan Road as a Level 2 facility and San Vito Way as a Level 1 facility that
will be constructed as part of a future ACHD project.
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,788 vehicle trips per day and 148
vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour, based on the traffic impact study.
2. Traffic Impact Study
Hales Engineering prepared a traffic impact study for the proposed Bridgetower Apartments. A
summary of the findings as presented by Hales Engineering can be found in Attachment 3. The
executive summary is not the opinion of ACHD staff. ACHD has reviewed the submitted traffic
impact study for consistency with ACHD policies and practices and may have additional
requirements beyond what is noted in the summary. ACHD Staff comments on the submitted traffic
impact study can be found below under staff comments.
2 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
' Chinden Boulevard Y 20
Meridian
McMillan Road
v
� a
co i
i t
Ustick Road
T
a. Policy
Mitigation Proposals: Mitigation recommendations shall be provided within the report. At a
minimum, for each roadway segment and intersection that does not meet the minimum
acceptable level of service planning threshold or v/c ratio, the report must discuss feasible
measures to avoid or reduce the impact to the system. To be considered adequate, measures
should be specific and feasible. Mitigation may also include:
• Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's planning Capital Projects.
• Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project.
Alternative Mitigation Measures: 7106.7.3 states that if traditional mitigation measures
such as roadway widening and intersection improvements are infeasible as determined by
ACHD, the TIS may recommend alternative mitigation measures. Alternative mitigation
measures shall demonstrate that impacts from the project will be offset.
• If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are programmed as funded in
the Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP) or the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP);
no alternative mitigation is required.
• If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are not programmed in either
the IFYWP or the CIP; the applicant may (i) analyze the shoulder hour and (ii) provide
a safety analysis to determine alternative mitigation requirements.
o If the impacted roadway segments and intersections meet the minimum
acceptable level of service planning thresholds in the shoulder hour the
applicant may suggest feasible alternative mitigation such as: sidewalks, bike
3 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
facilities, connectivity, safety improvements, etc. within 1.5 miles of the
proposed development.
o If the shoulder hour planning thresholds are exceeded the applicant may
request to enter into a Development Agreement and pay into the Priority
Corridor Fund an amount determined by the ACHD to offset impacts from the
project.
• Alternative Mitigation may also include:
o Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's future Capital
Projects.
o Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project.
b. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study
and generally agrees with the findings and recommendations. The following sections list the
recommended improvements required by ACHD with this development based on the study and
District policy.
McMillan Road/Vicenza Way Westbound Right-Turn Lane: Under 2025 total traffic
conditions, the TIS determined that a westbound right-turn lane will be warranted at the
McMillan Road/Vicenza Way intersection.
Right-Turning Volumevehicles I hour
2021 Background 546 44 No
.....-.......-..............5..........................5........................----------------------------
2021 Plus Project 609 93 Yes
............................;...............................................................................
2025 Plus Project 695 99 Yes
----------------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------------- -------------------
Staff is supportive of the study's recommendation to construct a westbound right-turn lane at
the McMillan Road/Vicenza Way intersection.
Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH)
Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Classification Traffic Count Level of Service
McMillan Road 755-feet Minor Arterial 335 Better than "E"
Vicenza Way 1,090-feet Collector N/A N/A
San Vito Way 1,085-feet Collector 59 Better than "D"
* Acceptable level of service for a three-lane principal arterial is "E" (880 VPH).
• Acceptable level of service for a three-lane collector is "D" (530 VPH).
• Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
• The average daily traffic count for McMillan Road west of Ten Mile Road was 4,905 on
01/31/18.
• There are no traffic counts for this section of Vicenza Way.
• The average daily traffic count for San Vito Way north of Apgar Creek Way was 1,743 on
09/16/21.
4 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
C. Findings for Consideration
1. McMillan Road
a. Existing Conditions: McMillan Road abutting the site is improved with 3-travel lanes, vertical
curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. There is 80-feet of
right-of-way for McMillan Road (48-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of Way Width Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 &7205.5.2 states that
the standard 3-lane street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 70 feet
of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a
continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between
the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and
protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed
within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of
7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map(MSM)
guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway features
required through development. This segment of McMillan Road is designated in the MSM as a
Residential Arterial with 3-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 46-foot street section within 78-feet
of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has not proposed any improvements to McMillan Road
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: McMillan Road abutting the site is fully improved,
therefore no additional roadway improvements or right-of-way dedication is required with this
development.
5 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Consistent with the findings of the traffic impact study, the applicant should be required to
construct a dedicated westbound right-turn lane on McMillan Road at the Vicenza Way
intersection. In accordance with District Turn Lane Policy 7205.4.9, the turn lane should be
designed to meet minimum AASHTO and MUTCD standards and should have a minimum of
100-feet of storage.
The applicant should coordinate with the property owners to the east to dedicate additional right-
of-way to facilitate construction of the turn lane. The applicant should also be required to provide
pavement widening and reconstruct the existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk to accommodate the
turn lane. Compensation will not be provided for the construction of the turn lane or right-of-
way dedication.
Consistent with the District's Minor Improvements Policy, the applicant should be required to
repair or replace and broken or deteriorated segments of curb, gutter, or sidewalk on McMillan
Road abutting the site.
2. Vicenza Way
a. Existing Conditions: Vicenza Way is improved with 3-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and 5-
foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. There is 62-feet of right-of-way for
Vicenza Way (30-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required
below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector
street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered
for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map,
then standard street sections shall serve as the default.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-
of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and
width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be
reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the
District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of-curb on
each side.
The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically
accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike
lanes.
Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between
the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and
protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed
within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of
7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
6 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM)
guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features
required through development. This segment of Vicenza Way is designated in the MSM as a
Residential Collector with 3-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 46-foot street section within 62-
feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has not proposed any improvements to Vicenza Way
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Vicenza Way abutting the site is fully improved,
therefore no additional roadway improvements or right-of-way dedication is required with this
development.
Consistent with the District's Minor Improvements Policy, the applicant should be required to
repair or replace and broken or deteriorated segments of curb, gutter, or sidewalk on Vicenza
Way abutting the site.
3. San Vito Way
a. Existing Conditions: San Vito Way is improved with 2-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and
5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. There is 54-feet of right-of-way for
Vicenza Way (27-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required
below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector
street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered
for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map,
then standard street sections shall serve as the default.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-
of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and
width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be
reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the
District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of-curb on
each side.
The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically
accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike
lanes.
Residential Collector Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard street section
for a collector in a residential area shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District
will consider a 33-foot or 29-foot street section with written fire department approval and taking
into consideration the needs of the adjacent land use, the projected volumes, the need for
bicycle lanes, and on-street parking.
7 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between
the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and
protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed
within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of
7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map(MSM)
guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features
required through development. This segment of San Vito Way is designated in the MSM as a
Residential Collector with 2-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 36-foot street section within 54-
feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has not proposed any improvements to San Vito Way
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: San Vito Way abutting the site is fully improved,
therefore no additional roadway improvements or right-of-way dedication is required with this
development.
Consistent with the District's Minor Improvements Policy, the applicant should be required to
repair or replace and broken or deteriorated segments of curb, gutter, or sidewalk on San Vito
Way abutting the site.
4. Driveways
4.1 McMillan Road
a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways from the site on to McMillan Road.
b. Policy:
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency.Approved access points may be relocated and/or
restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.6 states that direct access to minor arterials is typically
prohibited. If a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken from the
street having the lesser functional classification. If it is necessary to take access to the higher
classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be based on
Table 1 a under District policy 7205.4.6, unless a waiver for the access point has been approved
by the District Commission.
8 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has not proposed to construct any driveways from the
site on to McMillan Road.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and
should be approved as proposed.
4.2 Vicenza Way
a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways from the site on to Vicenza Way.
b. Policy:
Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or
restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the
local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service
adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at
bicycle and bus routes.
Driveway Location Policy (Stop Controlled Intersection): District policy 7206.4.4 requires
driveways located on collector roadways near a STOP controlled intersection to be located
outside of the area of influence; OR a minimum of 150-feet from the intersection, whichever is
greater. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline
of the driveway.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on
collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD
to align or offset a minimum of 245-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a
maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high-
volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be
required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy,
7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct 2 driveways from the site on
to Vicenza Way:
• A 26-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 257-feet north of McMillan Road
and in alignment with an existing driveway on the east side of Vicenza Way.
• A 26-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 979-feet north of McMillan Road
and in alignment with an existing driveway on the east side of Vicenza Way.
9 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and
should be approved as proposed.
4.3 San Vito Way
a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways from the site on to San Vito Way.
b. Policy:
Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency.Approved access points may be relocated and/or
restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the
local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service
adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at
bicycle and bus routes.
Driveway Location Policy (Stop Controlled Intersection): District policy 7206.4.4 requires
driveways located on collector roadways near a STOP controlled intersection to be located
outside of the area of influence; OR a minimum of 150-feet from the intersection, whichever is
greater. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline
of the driveway.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on
collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD
to align or offset a minimum of 245-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a
maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high-
volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be
required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy,
7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a 26-foot wide paved curb-
return type driveway located 381-feet north of McMillan Road and in alignment with Apgar Creek
Street on the west side of San Vito Way.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and
should be approved as proposed.
5. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-
feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with
10 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a
minimum width of 10-feet.
6. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm
drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle
at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height
restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop
signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District
requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
7. Other Access
McMillan Road is classified as a minor arterial roadway, Vicenza Way and San Vito Way are
classified as collector roadways. Other than the access specifically approved with this application,
direct lot access is prohibited to these roadways and should be noted on the final plat.
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Construct a westbound dedicated right-turn lane on McMillan Road at the intersection of Vicenza
Way consistent with the TIS. Design the turn-lane to meet minimum AASHTO and MUTCD
standards with a minimum of 100-feet of storage.
2. Coordinate with the property owners to dedicate right-of-way to accommodate the turn-lane and
provide pavement widening and reconstruct the existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk to accommodate
the turn lane. Compensation will not be provided for the construction of the turn lane or right-of-way
dedication.
3. Repair or replace any broken or deteriorated segments of curb, gutter, and sidewalk on McMillan
Road, Vicenza Way, and San Vito Way abutting the site, consistent with the District's Minor
Improvements Policy.
4. Construct a 26-foot wide curb-return type driveway from the site on to Vicenza Way located 257-
feet north of McMillan Road and in alignment with an existing driveway on the east side of Vicenza
Way, as proposed.
5. Construct a 26-foot wide curb-return type driveway from the site on to Vicenza Way located 979-
feet north of McMillan Road and in alignment with an existing driveway on the east side of Vicenza
Way, as proposed.
6. Construct a 26-foot wide curb return type driveway from the site on to San Vito Way located 381-
feet north of McMillan Road and in alignment with Apgar Creek Street on the west side of San Vito
Way, as proposed.
7. Direct lot access to McMillan Road, Vicenza Way, and San Vito Way prohibited other than the
access specifically approved with this site.
8. Submit civil plans to ACHD Development Services for review and approval. The impact fee
assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
9. Payment of impact fees is due prior to issuance of a building permit.
10. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
11 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all
easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way
(including all easements).
2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD
right-of-way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-
compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA
compliance to District Development Review staff for review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190
in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled)are compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards
and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards
unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and
certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of
any change from ACHD.
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan
and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in
the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant
to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a
waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development
12 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
G. Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary
4. Utility Coordinating Council
5. Development Process Checklist
6. Appeal Guidelines
13 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
VICINITY MAP
r -
41 Ga —� •; r
x�
Y
e ,t
4 � �
W AI)gar I '
C ree kt<
ec
lu
dd
f 90 d r p F
1r1� F�1cMillai: Wd
4 !rag
r� 1 '
IS ..
_ •5
14 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
SITE PLAN
rr d li
1 ir'A� i +1lD'rnrw sea' t i � 1
r
I--I---------
1 -
1
1 i if �Ir fril
1
N r I
1 IWl I ail. I I
I go 1;
I of
I'�
In
rl Iri +ili mx
pl In°I p
II I +I ❑ I I I'll• III j j r
I r e r II I 1111 _� 1 -1
1 I Irl s r rl.�j I 1 Il 1 FFFFFF j I 1 Q
r i Il tl I n� 31, n qqe - i 1 ;W
1 1 111 itn I 3 I Y l +If I
Z ml li r+l 1 !I _ I� I 11 zAnpn
i�Cl
N 01 i1711 I i 'J"Yim i Ij�� I II 1 1 N0
p
-1u 7T
ll1 I � I I I I
_ � 1
— �lrr0 f'
0 k 11` 3 s 1
lA lr i
; +rr I r gg MI 't
rr 1
I' ZJ
,i
i f +�I 11 I11 4 1_
I I 1 I C I I I I I � a��•yi� IE
II 1 Ill I II � �1 1 Itll I I
II R Ali f 3 II � Ar
ILI
cr
I �
41
________—r_____—__ ------
+ — ---
�r ---- ------- --------- --
r=_-_,- _�-___-- _-- --------------�__--___ _------- --------------------
/11
rr � 1.11 vi_vMneln yn-� n 7isvwnelT r1 I
15 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
i
HALES
ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM SS�DAIAL��C
oti��lsr�f�F
4� 12103I2021 �y
Date: December 3, 2021 S
To: Ada County Highway District -r
From: Hales Engineering .09 4 OF lb
Subject: Meridian McMillan Road Site
UT21-2031
This memorandum discusses the trip distribution and turn lane analysis completed for the
McMillan Road site. The development is located on the north side of McMillan Road, between
San Vito Way and Vicenza Way. Figure 1 shows a vicinity map of the proposed development.
Sul
r _
- Chinden Boulevard 20
`- Meridian
W:_.
McMillan Road
NOW r
p
)
73
W- Ustick Road
am
Figure 1: Vicinity map showing the project location in Meridian, Idaho
1220 North 500 West,Ste.202 Lehi, LIT 84043 p 801.766.4343 1
www.halesengineering.com
16 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
i
HALES w
innovative transportation Solutions
Trip Generation
The proposed development will consist of 130 residential townhomes, and 120 multi-family units.
Trip generation for the development was calculated using trip generation rates published in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 1111 Edition, 2021. Trip generation
for the proposed project is included in Table 1. A concept plan for the proposed development is
provided in Appendix A.
The total trip generation for the development is as follows:
• Daily Trips: 1,788
• Morning Peak Hour Trips: 123
• Evening Peak Hour Trips: 148
Table 1: Trip Generation
Trip Generation
Meridian -McMillan Road Site
Trip Generation
mm
Total %In %Out In Out Total
DailyWeekday
Single4=amily Attached Housing(215) 130 DU 942 50% : 50% 471 4Ti 942
-............................. --------- ------- < -- -------- 42
Muktifamily Housing(Low-Rise)(220) 120 DU 946 60% 50% 423 423 846
+ 1.TSR am am 4,?,u
AM Peak Hour
Single-Family Attached Housing(215) 130 DU 62 31% 69% 19 43 62
_,..-.-....... --------------- ----------: ..........:- - . --
hAuRifamily Housing(Low-Rise)(220) 120 DU 61 24% 76% 15 46 61
+ 123 34 89 123
PM Peak Hour
Single-Family Attached Housing(215) 130 DU 75 57% 43% 43 32 75
NEuftifamily Housing(Low-Rise)(220) 120 DU 73 63% 37% 46 27 73
148 89 59 148
Trip Distribution Analysis
Project traffic is assigned to the roadway network based on the type of trip and the proximity of
project access points to major streets, high population densities, and regional trip attractions.
Travel demand model information provided by the Community Planning Association of Southwest
Idaho(COMPASS)was considered as well. The percentages produced by the COMPASS travel
demand model and the recommended assumptions are shown in Table 2.
1220 North 500 West,Ste.202 Lehi, UT 84043 p 801.766.4343 2
www.halesengineering.com
17 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
� w
Table 2: Trip Distribution
% To/From Project
COMPASS Model Recommended
Assumption
20% 25%
45% ' 50%
---------------------------
10% 15%
25% 10%
Hales Engineering recommends differing assumptions from the COMPASS model. It seems
reasonable to assume the amount of traffic to/from the project to points west will be lower than
the model suggests. The lack of major destinations, employment centers, and other attractions to
the west of the project site are the basis forthis change. 15%was removed from the west direction
and each other direction received an additional 5%to redistribute the traffic flow more accurately.
Traffic Volumes
Weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 a.m.)and evening (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.)peak period traffic counts,
were performed at the Vicenza Way/McMillan Road intersection. The counts were performed on
Tuesday, October 12, 2021. The evening peak hour volumes were approximately 24% higher
than the morning peak hour volumes. Detailed count data are included in Appendix B.
Additional volumes from the Vicenza North Subdivision were layered onto the existing (2021)
background volumes that were found in the traffic counts.
Right-Turn LaneAnalysis—Vincenza Way! McMillan Road
The need for a right-turn pocket from westbound McMillan Road to northbound Vicenza Way was
evaluated under existing (2021) background conditions (inclusive of the Vicenza North
Subdivision)and anticipated plus project conditions during the evening peak hour for years 2021
and 2025. McMillan Road is currently a three-lane road in the project area.The posted speed limit
on McMillan Road is 40 mph. Table 1 shows the right-turn lane guidelines and the anticipated
volumes using the COMPASS travel demand model, perACHD policy.
Table 1: Right-Turn Analysis
Right-Turning Volume Requirement
vehicles/hour Met?
• .
2021 Background 546 44 No
----------------------------''--------------------------'--------------------------------'-------------------
2021 Plus Project 609 93 Yes
---------------------------- -------------------------- -----------------------------------
2025 Plus Project 695 98 Yes
1220 North 500 West,Ste.202 Lehi, LT 84043 p 801.766.4343 3
www.halesengineering.com
18 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
HALES
innovative transportation solutions
With the existing (2021) background conditions (inclusive of the Vicenza North Subdivision), an
additional 36 right-tums would be needed to warrant the right turn lane. It is anticipated that the
project will create 49 right turns during the evening peak hour which would cause the intersection
to meet right-turn lane warrants. Figure 2 shows the anticipated volumes and their relationship to
the warrant threshold.
For the future (2025) analysis, the COMPASS model growth rate of 4% was applied to the
background volumes on McMillan Road. In the 2025 evening peak hour, it is anticipated that
approximately 9%of the total traffic on McMillan Road, in the project vicinity,will be generated by
the proposed development.
•r=
'°eed 40 mph k+NhY s 2021 Background
x -0 2021 Plus Project
•2025 Plus Project
45 mph
•x
rM WA
fans
J\ AA Might T
m
}
E
E �� 1
� C6
r—
L
Q10 +
0A ,60
tt00
o-
7m 3m 400 SGG WC `x Wo so t000 +1w IXG
Major-Road Volume(one-direction),vehlh
Figure 2: Right-turn guidelines for two-lane roadways
It is anticipated that a right-turn lane will be warranted on westbound McMillan Road at Vicenza
Way with full-build of the project given the existing volumes and anticipated volumes from the
Vicenza North Subdivision.
Please let us know if you have any questions, or if you need additional information. We look
forward to working with you on this and other projects in Ada County.
1220 North 500 West,Ste.202 Lehi, LIT 84043 p 801.766.4343 4
www.halesengineering.com
19 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and
road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5)working days upon notification of required right of way improvements
by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and
the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to,
project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any
portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility
owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the
developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their
project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or
negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter
of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review
is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated
date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be
pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a
preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be
completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise
agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to:50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com
for e-mail notification information.
20 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
❑Send a"No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed by Applicant:
❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD,then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services(ACHD)for ANY work in the right-of-way,
including, but not limited to,driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request"form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
❑Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application"to ACHD Construction—Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
❑ Sediment&Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion &Sediment Control Narrative&Plan, done
by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
❑ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
❑ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con.
21 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of
the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the
Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of
the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily
and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
and Clerk of the District, which must be filed within ten (10)working days from the date of
the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the
decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number
and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the
provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and
shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not
consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider
and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any
modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the
Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services
Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice
of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior
to the hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
22 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on
by all Commissioners present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no
later than 11:00 a.m. 2 days prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting
following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of
the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next
scheduled regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth
new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that
has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of
fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at
the meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to
ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which
the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter
at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
23 Bridgetower Apartments/
MER21-0140/ H-2022-0047