Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 16, 2006 P&Z CommMeridian Planning & Zoning March 16, 2006 Pege 39 of 132 Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded that we forward onto -- no. We approve CUP 06-002, including the report with the mentioned changes. All those in favor say aye. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, before we vote, I left part of the motion off. I need to add to the motion. Rohm: Okay. Zaremba: I'd further move to direct staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Commission hearing on April 6, 2006, as part of the previous motion. Moe: I will re-second that. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded that we approve CUP 06-002 to include staff report and all amendments to that staff report. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Newton-Huckabay: Aye. Rohm: Motion carries. One dissenting. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE NAY. Rohm: At this time we will take a short recess and reconvene at 9:30. (Recess.) Item 8: Public Hearing: AZ 06-010 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 11.50 acres from RUT to a R-4 zone for Cardigan Bay Subdivision by Big River, LLC -- 5450 and 5500 Larkspur Way: Item 9: Public Hearing: PP 06-008 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 28 building lots and 3 common lots on 11.50 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for Cardigan Bay Subdivision by Big River, LLC - 5450 and 5500 Larkspur Way: Rohm: At this time I'd like to re-open the regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission for Thursday, March 16th, 2006, and begin by opening Public Hearing AZ 05-010 and PP 06-008 for the sale purpose of continuing these items to the regularly scheduled meeting of April 20th, 2006. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, I move we continue AZ 06-010 and PP 06-008 relating to Cardigan Bay Subdivision to our regularly scheduled meeting of April 20, 2006, for the purpose of receiving and assimilating the ACRD staff report. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning March 16, 2006 Page 40 of 82 Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we continue AZ 06-010 and PP 06-008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10: Public Hearing: AZ 06-011 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 29.69 acres from RUT to an R-~4 zone far Basin Creek Subdivision by Pacific Landmark Development - 5603 North Locust Grove Road: Item 11: Public Hearing: PP 06-009 Request far Preliminary Plat approval of 88 building lots and 10 common lots on 29.69 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for Basin Creek Subdivision by Pacific Landmark Development - 5603 North Locust Grove Road: Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on AZ 06-011 and PP 06- 009. Bath of these items relating to Basin Creek Subdivision and begin with the report. Wilson: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Basin Creek Subdivision lies generally northwest of the intersection of McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Raad. Surrounding area consists of an older county sub named Larkwood. Recently approved Tustin Subdivision came through the Commission and Council last fall. Saguaro Canyon to the west. The Reserve to the north. Arcadia to the north. And the previous item that did have to be continued is Cardigan Bay and is directly to the south of the site, located on two lots here. So, Basin Creek consists of 29.69 acres, currently zoned RUT. The applicant has requested to rezone -- or to annex and zone to an R-4 district for the preliminary plat approval of 88 single family residential lots and the request states ten common lots, but there is -- I did confirm with the applicant that there is only nine common lots in the request. The preliminary plat has -- was modified from the original submittal at staffs request to match up with a stub street proposed by Cardigan Bay. The initial submittal did stub the road to the LDS Church, which we felt it was more appropriate to connect to the proposed stub in Cardigan. This site does have same really good connectivity, end up with an access -- anew access off of Locust Grove Road, connecting to an approved stub in Saguaro Canyon and an approved stub in Arcadia, stubbing to an undeveloped parcel to the north and, then, connecting to Cardigan Bay to the south. So, the traffic circulation is quite excellent on the site and they have -- staff is quite pleased with the number of stubs and the layout of the subdivision, with the changes that were made with the revised plat. A few things I will mention. The submitted preliminary plat did not have an adequate landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road. As an arterial, Locust Grove Road does require -- well, it's actually, an entryway corridor on the Comprehensive Plan. So, that does require a 35-foot landscape buffer. The submitted plat did have a 25-foot landscape buffer, so we would condition the plat to increase that to the required 35 feet to be included in the common lot along Locust Grave. The parkways with trees that were proposed as part of the subdivision -- and I can ga into same landscape plans