Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-04-19 Regular
City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Treg Bernt Councilman Luke Cavener Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Mayor Robert E. Simison ABSENT Councilwoman Jessica Perreault PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 1. Public Works: SolSmart Designation Plaque Presentation ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Eagle Road Daycare Facility (CR-2022-0003) by 814 Development, LLC, Located at 3060 S. Eagle Rd. Continued to May 3, 2022 A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision pertaining to the Unified Development Code (Table 11-2B-3) requirement for a 25-foot-wide buffer to be provided in the C-C zoning district along the northern property boundary adjacent to a residential use. Motion to continue to May 3, 2022 made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 3. Final Plat for Graycliff Estates Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2022-0005) by KB Home, Located at 684 W. Harris St. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Bernt, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 4. Final Plat for Graycliff Estates No. 3 (FP-2022-0012) by KB Home, Generally Located South of W. Harris St. and West of S. Meridian Rd. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 5. Final Plat Modification for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 (MFP-2022- 0001) by Centurion Engineers, Generally Located South of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 6. Public Hearing for Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 (H-2022-0021) by JUB Engineers, Inc., Located at 3045 E. Brace Ct. Approved A. Request: Request to Vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot-wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 7. Public Hearing for Rolling Hill Right of Way and Easement Vacation (H-2022- 0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling Hill Dr. Approved A. Request: Right of Way and Easement Vacation to vacate the northern 1,005+/- lineal feet of existing right-of-way (S. Rolling Hill Dr.) and existing public utility easements on Lots 8-12, Block 2 and Lots 13-16, Block 1, Rolling Hill Subdivision. Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 8. Public Hearing for Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) by Meridian 118, LLC, Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. Approved A. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement (Inst. #110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. B. Request: Rezone of 7.06 acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district, 17.38 acres from the C-C and H-E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district, 40.33 acres from the R-40 and C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district, and 1.10 acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. C. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots and 6 common lots on 115.26 acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and M-E zoning districts. D. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 9. Ordinance No. 22-1975: An Ordinance (ACHD Maintenance Facility H-2021-0029) for Annexation of a Parcel Located in the SE ¼ of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Ada County, Idaho, and Being More Particularly Described in Attachment “A” and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City Of Meridian; Establishing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification of 30.27 Acres of Land from RUT to I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing that copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required By Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 10. Ordinance No. 22-1976: An Ordinance (Moberly Rezone H-2021-0089) for Rezone of a Portion in the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 0.159 Acres of Land from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to O-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 7:14 pm Item#2. Meridian City Council April 19, 2022. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 19, 2022, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Members Absent: Jessica Perreault. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Sonya Allen, Mark Ford, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is April 19th, 2022, at 6:00 o'clock p.m. We will begin this regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Our next item will be the community invocation, which will be delivered by Pastor Vinnie Hanke this evening. If you would all, please, join us in the community invocation or take this as a moment of silence and reflection. Pastor. Hanke: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Members of City Council. Thank you again for the opportunity to come and pray for you as you begin your business. God, we thank you for this evening. We thank you for the -- God, just the feel of spring in the air that reminds us of the passing of time and seasons. God, I just ask for a spirit of wisdom and discernment among the City Council members, among those in attendance. God, would they speak and listen charitably to one another. God, would you give them the direction for the city that would most please you and glorify your name. We thank you for our neighbors that live within the city. Would you help us to be kind to one another. We ask your continued protection and service to our members of law enforcement and first Page 28 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 2- — responders in the medical field, for our teachers, God, for our students, would you continue to keep our schools open and safe and we ask these things according to the name of the risen Christ, amen. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Thank you. Now we have the adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Just one note on the agenda for tonight in case anyone's here. We will be asking for continuation on Item No. 2, the Eagle Road Daycare Facility, due to some noticing issues. But, Mr. Mayor, I move adoption of the agenda as published. Bernt: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda is published. Is there any discussion? If not, in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Mr. Clerk, did we have anyone signed up under public forum? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we did not. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 1. Public Works: SolSmart Designation Plaque Presentation Simison: Okay. Then with that we will move on to Item 1, Department/Commission Reports, which is Public Works SolSmart Designation Plaque Presentation and ask Mr. Korn to come forward and explain to us what we are going to do. Korn: All right. Thanks, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Hopefully we can start this meeting off on a positive note, so I'm here to recognize the city of achieving a SolSmart. bronze designation. So, the SolSmart program is the Department of Energy Office of Solar Technology's program to reduce solar barriers in communities and cities and towns across the United States and we just received this SolSmart bronze designation after going through the process for the past several months. I think we started in November after we were approached by a local consulting firm, Warm Springs Consulting, so they got a grant from the SolSmart national organization to help cities and towns in the western Page 29 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 3 of 28 United States provide technical assistance. So, we went through our permitting. inspection, zoning code and ease of finding information on our website and really just dug through those with their technical assistance and locally and nationally and DC and I think we have streamlined our process. You know, no thanks to me, but our -- our -- our Community Development folks, who I will recognize here in a minute, really spearheaded most of the work and updating our -- a checklist for permitting, our fee schedules, our zoning regulations and now those are all nicely in one spot on our website. We have a solar landing page. Caleb Hood and I also presented a findings memo from our zoning to the Planning and Zoning Commission in February. Yeah. And so this designation process really makes it easier for Meridian residential, commercial, institutional residents that want to install solar and it also aligns well with our clean energy resolution and sustainability goals and our strategic plan. So, I would also like to acknowledge the community development team that did most of the work, like I said, so those team members were Sam Zahorka, who is not here tonight. Tyler Perot, Mindy Wallace, Caleb Hood, Bill Parsons, and I'm sure many others that put together all the data, made those corrections and updates on the materials and I -- before I invite them up so we could get a photo op, I will stand for any questions or comments. Simison: Thank you, Jason. If I could just start off by sending my congratulations to the team on this work being done, you know, I know we are going to put out a press release about this and -- and they have been really -- the point of this is really working with industry, improving our process, getting it to the consumer faster, which has cumulative impacts to our energy production here in the area or meets just the consumers needs that they want and, you know, someone that put solar on our house I, you know, worked with a company right down the street. I know they did a lot of work with the city. There it was -- it -- it wasn't a bad process, but if we can improve on that that's great and I -- I know that's the outcome that we have achieved with this designation to make it easier for everybody, no matter where they are, first timer or, you know, newest entry to the market or a long time provider over here in the area. So, appreciate it. Korn: Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. It was really interesting to see how we stack up and I was surprised to see how many solar permits and solar installations we do in a year. So, it's been steadily increasing. Like in 2021 there was over 450 solar permits issued. So, it's definitely something that we will see more and more of and it definitely helps us on those clean energy goals. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you. I just want to express my gratitude to you and to city staff for supporting the clean energy resolution and finding unique ways like this that we can help achieve that. I think that's great. World events are showing us the importance of energy independence now more than ever. There are a lot of different reasons for doing something. You may be doing it to save money, you may be doing it to help the environment, you may be doing it because you feel like you want to be independent and Page 30 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 4- — not necessarily rely on other forms of energy. So, there can be a lot of great reasons to do the same thing and I love that we are supporting people and making that decision, so that the consumers can make that choice efficiently and economically. So, I really appreciate it. Thank you. Simison: All right. Well, with that -- Korn: All right. Mr. Mayor, would you like to come down for our photo? Simison: Happy to. Korn: For our award. Thank you. And can we get Tyler, Caleb, Bruce. ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Eagle Road Daycare Facility (CR-2022-0003) by 814 Development, LLC, Located at 3060 S. Eagle Rd. A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision pertaining to the Unified Development Code (Table 11-213- 3) requirement for a 25-foot-wide buffer to be provided in the C-C zoning district along the northern property boundary adjacent to a residential use. Simison: Council, we will move on to our Action Items. Our first item up this evening is -- since there was a postcard noticing glitch, so we don't even open the public hearing in this case, Mr. Nary, or would we? Nary: You can, Mr. Mayor. Simison: Okay. Then we will go ahead and open the public hearing for Eagle Road Daycare Facility, CR-2022-0003. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Due to that postcard noticing glitch I would move that we continue the public hearing for CR-2022-0003 to May 3rd, 2022. Bernt: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to continue the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the item is continued. Page 31 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 5- — MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 3. Final Plat for Graycliff Estates Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2022-0005) by KB Home, Located at 684 W. Harris St. Simison: So, next up is -- is Item 3, final plat for Graycliff Estates Subdivision No. 2, FP- 2022-0005. Sonya, do you have any comments related to this item? Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, I do not. The applicant is here tonight to speak on this project, though. Simison: Would the applicant like to come forward to make any comments? If you can state your name and address for the record. Durtschi: Of course. Mayor, Members of the Council. For the record my name is Sabrina Durtschi and I'm here on behalf of KB Home. My business address is 1299 South Orchard, Boise, Idaho. 83706. And it's so nice to see all of you and spend a minute. So, hello and, wow, this little phase two of Graycliff has caused quite a table -- has had a few hearings and we have had to table it. We acquired the subdivision from Mr. Centers, who had previously had this plat approved and subsequentially had agreed to some right of way within Brundage Estates and so the issue is that we don't own Brundage and Brundage Estates, and the right of way that he needs to dedicate. I did have a nice conversation with Mr. Centers today and he has agreed to dedicate the right of way and I will help facilitate that and coordinate it with ACHD. It was just over the phone, so I'm hoping that will be sufficient for all of you, so that we can proceed and get our construction plans approved. So, with that I will stand for any questions that you have and thank you so much for your time. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I have a question for staff. Mr. Nary. A verbal commitment over the phone. I'm -- I'm a little reluctant to be supportive of this this evening. I guess I'm looking for some direction from staff, if there is any feedback or comments. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I mean there is no reason not to move forward. I mean it is a final plat. It is in essential conformance with that. We have worked with Mr. Centers before. I don't anticipate any issues, but -- and it is an ACHD condition so I -- I think it's perfectly fine to go ahead. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun Councilor. Page 32 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 6 of 28 Hoaglun: Question for Sonya. Was there a condition for -- that we were supposed to apply to this in the motion? It said staff recommended approval with conditions per the staff report, but I was trying to go through the staff report, I don't recall seeing anything, but -- Allen: Excuse me. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, no, there is no specific extra conditions, it's just the staff report with the typical conditions. Hoaglun: Thank you. Allen: Thank you. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Do we have to close the public hearing? Simison: No public hearing. It's not -- not a public hearing. Bernt: Oh, it's not? Okay. Simison: Yeah. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I -- I -- after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file number FP-2022-00 -- excuse me -- 0005 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19th, 2022. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 3. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 4. Final Plat for Graycliff Estates No. 3 (FP-2022-0012) by KB Home, Generally Located South of W. Harris St. and West of S. Meridian Rd. Simison: Next item up is the final plat for Graycliff Estates No. 3, FP-2022-0012. Does staff have any comments on this item? Page 33 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page , - — Allen: -- other than what's in the staff report. Sorry, Dean. This would typically be on the Consent Agenda, but I placed it on the regular agenda tonight just so that it was behind the second phase. Thank you. Simison: Then, Council, is there a motion or would you like to hear from the applicant on this one at this time, since we just heard? Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I don't see the applicant rushing up to provide any comments, so I move we approve Item No. 4, Graycliff Estates File No. 2022-0012 as presented in the staff report on April 19th, 2022. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve item FP-2022-0012. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries. The item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 5. Final Plat Modification for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 (MFP-2022-0001) by Centurion Engineers, Generally Located South of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. Simison: Next item up is Item 5, final plant modification for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 2, MFP-2022-0001. Would staff like to make any comments on this item? Allen: This is fairly cut and dry, Mr. Mayor, Council. I can certainly go through my staff report if you would like or if you have all read it we can certainly move on to the applicant. Simison: Council, would you like any questions from staff -- or any comments from staff? Seeing none, would the applicant like to make any comments on this item? Canning: Hello. I am Anna Canning with Centurion Engineers, 2323 South Vista Avenue, Boise. Simison: Anna, can you -- choose a mic. Canning: There we go. And I can answer any questions. It was a simple modification to accommodate a different building type. It was a new owner. He had a different size building that he wanted to place on the lot, so we just adjusted them with no change to the number of lots or loss of open space. No loss of open space. There we go. And will answer any questions you may have. Page 34 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 8- — Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Just a quick question. Is -- is Oregon football still better than Berkeley? I haven't seen you for so long, Anna. Canning: I know. It's been forever, Council Member Borton. I -- sadly I don't follow either team. I'm a Bronco follower as one should be here. Borton: All right. Just checking on the Berkeley roots. Good to see you. Simison: Seeing no substantive questions, do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Do we need to close the public hearing. I don't believe so. Okay. After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File No. MFP- 2022-0001 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date April 19th, 2022. Cavener: Cavener. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 5, which is for Pura Vida Ranch Subdivision No. 1, MFP-2022-0001. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 6. Public Hearing for Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 (H-2022-0021) by JUB Engineers, Inc., Located at 3045 E. Brace Ct. A. Request: Request to Vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot-wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. Page 35 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 9- — Simison: So, now we will move on to where we will have a little bit more conversation, but first Item 6 we will open for public hearing for Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1, H-2022- 0021, and we will start this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is a request for a vacation of easement. This site is Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. It's located west of South Eagle Road approximately a quarter mile north of East Lake Hazel Road in the R-4 zoning district. The applicant requests approval to vacate the easterly five feet of the ten foot wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision, No. 1. The recorded plat depicts a ten foot wide utility easement on the west side yard, instead of the intended five foot easement. Relinquishment letters have been received from the easement holders in agreement with the proposed vacation. No written testimony has been received on this application. Staff is recommending approval. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Allen: The applicant is here I believe tonight to present testimony. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? All right. Would the applicant like to come forward? Yzaguirre: Good evening. My name is Becky Yzaguirre. My address is 2760 West Excursion Lane, Meridian, Idaho. And staff did a great job presenting the project and I have nothing further to -- to add to that, so I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Hoaglun: Does Councilman Borton, Mr. Mayor, have a question for the applicant? Just checking. Borton: I'm good here. Thank you. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. I don't see our clerk, so would anybody in the audience like to provide testimony on this item or anybody online who would like to provide testimony you can use the raise your hand feature at the bottom of Zoom. Seeing no one coming forward in the audience or anyone raising their hand, would the applicant like to make any final remarks or just good with -- no final remarks. Do I have a motion to close the public hearing? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I move that we close the public hearing. Page 36 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 10 of— Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: It looks pretty straightforward. After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony move to approve File No. H-2022-0021 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date April 19th, 2022. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item H-2022-0021. Is there any discussion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 7. Public Hearing for Rolling Hill Right of Way and Easement Vacation (H- 2022-0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling Hill Dr. A. Request: Right of Way and Easement Vacation to vacate the northern 1,005+/- lineal feet of existing right-of-way (S. Rolling Hill Dr.) and existing public utility easements on Lots 8-12, Block 2 and Lots 13-16, Block 1, Rolling Hill Subdivision Simison: Next item up is Item 7, public hearing -- hearing for Rolling Hill Right of Way Easement Vacation, H-2022-0018. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Give me just one moment here to switch gears. Alrighty. The next application before you is a request for a vacation of right of way and utility easements. The subject property is generally located a half mile east of South Eagle Road and north of East Overland Road at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185 and 1194 South Rolling Hill Drive. The applicant proposes to vacate the northern 1,005 lineal feet of existing right of way for South Rolling Hill Drive and the Page 37 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 11 of 28 existing public utility and drainage easements depicted on the subdivision plat for Lots 18 -- excuse me -- Lots 8 through 12, Block 2, and Lots 13 through 16, Block 1 , Rolling Hill Subdivision. Exhibit maps were submitted as shown. The road right of way is shown on the left. The easements are shown on the right. Relinquishment letters were received from the easement holders in agreement with the proposed vacation. A letter was received from ACHD stating they don't have any comments on the proposed right of way vacation as it is consistent with their previous action on the preliminary plat, which requires the northern segment of Rolling Hill Drive to be vacated prior to ACHD's final approval of the first final plat. The right of way is also required to be vacated through ACHD. No written testimony was received on this application. Staff is recommending approval. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Seeing none, we will ask applicant to come forward. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council, for the record my name is Jon Wardle, 2929 West Navigator Drive, Meridian, Idaho. 83642. Appreciate what Sonya has stated in the staff report that's before you. We don't have any direct comments on that. We are in agreement with the staff report. I did want to note that the other part of this process is, as noted, is the vacation through ACHD. We have a hearing scheduled for them -- we have two hearings scheduled with them. The first one is in May and the second one is in June, so the vacation would become official in -- in June. But this is a step we needed to take with the City of Meridian. This is consistent with the application for Eagle View Landing, Rackham Subdivision Phase Two that was before you previously. So, again, don't have anything to add to the staff report that's before you. Just wanted to mention we do have one additional step through ACHD and that's in process right now as well. Stand for any questions you might have. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Wardle. Council, any questions for the applicant? Okay. Wardle: Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody in the room that would like to provide testimony on this item or anybody online who would like to provide testimony use the raise your hand feature. Seeing no one coming forward or raising their hands, does the applicant have any other comments? They will waive their final comments. So, do I have a motion to close the public hearing? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Page 38 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 12 of— Simison: Move to close the public hearing on Item 7. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Simison: I move that we approve Item 7, File No. H-2022-0018 as presented in the staff report on the hearing date of April 19th, 2022, and would include all staff and applicant testimony. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve public hearing H-2022-0018. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Good evening, Jon. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 8. Public Hearing for Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) by Meridian 118, LLC, Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. A. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement (Inst. #110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. B. Request: Rezone of 7.06 acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district, 17.38 acres from the C-C and H-E zoning districts to the M- E zoning district, 40.33 acres from the R-40 and C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district, and 1.10 acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. Page 39 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 13 of 28 C. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots and 6 common lots on 115.26 acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and M-E zoning districts. D. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. Simison: Next up is a public hearing for Vanguard Village, H-2021-0081. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is a request for a development agreement modification, a rezone, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit. This site consists of 115.26 acres of land. It's zoned C-C, H-E, M-E and R-40 and it's generally located a quarter mile south of West Franklin Road and South Ten Mile Road. This property was annexed back in 2010 with a development agreement that included a conceptual development plan for the overall property that consisted of a mix of high density residential, commercial, mixed employment and high density employment uses as shown. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for this property is mixed use commercial, medium high density residential, mixed employment and high density employment. A modification is requested to the existing development agreement to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. The original agreement included a conceptual development plan, again, as shown, that depicts a mix of uses consisting of flex office, condos, and townhomes. Ground level retail with residential and offices above. Research and development, restaurants, offices, parking structures, an amphitheater and park areas with lakes. The proposed concept plan as shown also depicts a mix of uses, including a multi-family residential development with garden style apartments and townhome style units at a gross density of 13.63 units per acre. That's on the northern portion of the property here. Flex uses of approximately 410,000 square feet, which may include office, light industrial and other uses, such as distribution and light manufacturing and that is this area here. Vertically integrated residential, commercial retail uses and non-residential uses, such as a corporate campus, business, and professional office space. Research and development and limited retail and service uses, approximately 380,000 square feet and that is this area here. Conceptual elevations were submitted for these uses as shown. The applicant is -- I will let you look at these elevations real quick here before I move on too quick. This is the vertically integrated residential and commercial and, then, this is more the commercial development. The applicant is proposing a rezone of 7.06 acres of land from the C-C to the H-E zoning district, 17.38 acres from the C-C and H-E zoning districts, to the M-E zoning district and 40.33 acres from the R-40, C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district and 1.10 acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. All of these zoning districts currently exist on the site, except for the R-15 district, which is proposed to replace the R-40 district, which staff believes will provide a better transition to the existing single family residential dwellings to the north in Baraya Subdivision. The rezone proposes to reconfigure the boundaries of these zoning districts into more developable areas, consistent with the proposed road layout and conceptual development Page 40 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 14 of— plan. A preliminary plat is proposed as shown, consisting of eight building lots and six common lots on 115.26 acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and M-E zoning districts for Vanguard Village Subdivision. The subdivision is proposed to develop in five phases per the revised phasing plan shown on the right. The first phase of the multi-family residential development on the north end of the site, zoned R-15 -- that's the blue area -- is proposed to develop first with the M-E, which is the yellow area. Second -- the second phase of the multi-family development, which is red, third, and the H-E third, fourth and the -- excuse me -- fourth and the C-C zoning area last. Access is proposed to be provided from the northern boundary of the site from Franklin Road via South Sunset Point Way and South Baraya Way. This kind of shows the connection there. And from the east from South Ten Mile Road via the extension of Vanguard Way. Coral Reef Way, Sunset Point Way, Umbria Hills and Vanguard Way are all designated as collector streets in accord with the master street map and the transportation system map in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for future extension. Due to the unacceptable level of service projected at the Baraya Way and Franklin Road intersection and the cut through traffic projected at Baraya Way and Sunset Point Way north of the site, ACHD is restricting development to the first phase with 136 multi-family units or a combination of commercial and residential development that generates approximately 75 p.m. peak hour trips until alternative access is available to Umbria Hills Way, Franklin Road or Black Cat Road. Or wait to extend Sunset Point Way into the site and Coral Reef Way to connect Baraya Way until there is an alternative access available to Umbria Hills Way, Franklin Road or Black Cat Road. The development is restricted to the first phase that generates 3,000 trips in this scenario or approximately 366 multi-family residential units and the M-E zone until alternative access is available to the site and that is straight out of the ACHD report on that. Ten foot wide multi-use pathways are proposed on the site in accord with the pathways master plan. One segment follows the Williams Pipeline easement diagonally across the site. Another segment runs along the southern boundary within the street buffer along 1-84. The Parks Department has requested a pathway connection be provided between the pipeline pathway and the nearby sidewalk along Coral Reef Way. A pedestrian circulation -- circulation plan is proposed as shown that depicts all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways planned throughout the site in accord with the Ten Mile plan and the Parks Department comments for mixed use areas. A conditional use permit is proposed for the multi-family residential development, consisting of 552 dwelling units, with a mix of three story apartments and two story flats and townhome style buildings, ranging from 758 to 1,693 square feet on 40.33 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. A 9,368 square foot single story clubhouse is proposed with amenities, along with two other amenity buildings. Nine garden style apartment buildings containing a total of 216 units and 51 flats and townhome style buildings are proposed containing a total of 336 units, with a mix of one, two and three bedroom units. Common open space and site amenities are proposed in accord with UDC standards. Atotal of 7.5 acres of common open space is required. A total of 8.99 acres is proposed. A minimum of four amenities are required. Amenities from all of the required categories are proposed as follows: A clubhouse with a swimming pool, hot tub and cabanas, an outdoor kitchen and dining area. Fitness Lounge, lawn games, and a fire pit lounge. Pickleball court. Children's play area. Dog parks. A smaller swimming pool. Picnic shelter and fire pit lounge. Art. Pedestrian walkways. Ten foot wide sidewalks along the collector street, Page 41 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page —of— Vanguard, and an amenity area with the barbecue lounge. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed apartment, flat, and townhome style, multi-family and clubhouse buildings as shown. Building materials consist of vertical and horizontal HardiPlank siding in light gray, green and wood colors. Stucco in dark gray and off white colors and vertical western red cedar siding with cedar posts and beams and asphalt shingles. These elevations are not approved. Final design is required to comply with the design guidelines in the Ten Mile Plan and the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. The Commission did recommend approval of the proposed project with the conditions in the staff report and I will go through a summary of the Commission hearing. JoAnn Butler, Deb Nelson, Garrett Scott and T.J. Winger all testified in favor of the application. No one else testified in opposition or commented. Written testimony was received from JoAnn Butler, the applicant's representative. Key issues of discussion. The applicant requests a couple of alternatives to the design standards -- excuse me -- design guidelines in the Ten Mile Plan pertaining to roof pitches and front stoops in the multi- family portion of the development. The plan calls for roof pitches ranging from 4/12 to 12/12. The applicant requests the allowance of a lower pitch for the community clubhouse amenity buildings of two to 12 and the townhome garages of three to 12 to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level. Front stoops are desired in the plan for buildings that face public streets of 18 to 24 inches above grade. Due to concerns pertaining to compliance with ADA standards, the applicant proposes patios instead with railings that frame off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies. T.J. Winger, who is part of the architecture team for this project, testified in favor of the roof pitches and front porches proposed in lieu of stoops for sense of place within the community. It's his opinion that they meet the intent of the guidelines. Key issues of discussion by the Commission are as follows: The applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain structures and for the front stoops to not be required per the design guidelines in the plan and preference for more commercial to develop first, rather than residential, to create more jobs. The Commission changes to the staff recommendation -- they didn't necessarily make a change, but they were supportive of the applicant's request for lower roof pitches in the multi-family portion of the development of two to 12 on the amenity buildings and three to 12 on the townhome garages and per the design guidelines pertaining to front stoops to not be required. If Council agrees with the applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain buildings and for covered front patios to be provided instead of stoops, it should be memorialized in the development agreement. It currently is not. No written testimony has been received since the Commission hearing. The applicant is here to speak on this application tonight. That's all that staff has. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward? Butler: JoAnn Butler. 967 East Park Center Boulevard representing the applicant. And before I get started I will just make sure I -- oh, it's there. I don't know if-- if you are going to know what to do if you get out of here before 7:00, so we are going to keep you for a few minutes. With me here tonight is Airalea Newman for the applicant. Denton Kelley and his colleagues at LDK Ventures and their attorney Deb Nelson and Deb will take the lead in just a few minutes to address the Council in connection with what we call the North Page 42 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 16 of— 40 and the conditional use permit application. John Carpenter is also here from TO Engineers. As Sonya mentioned, we have DA modification, a rezone, a preliminary plat and a conditional use request. We really appreciate the work of staff and their work with ACHD staff and we appreciate and accept the conditions of approval. We will be making significant improvements to the road system, especially in the first phase with the development of Vanguard Way all the way from South Ten Mile Road west to and through the project. We are working cooperatively with the owners of the property both north and south of Vanguard Way and west of Ten Mile to cooperatively complete that Vanguard Way all the way through the project during phase one. So, with that what we are planning to do on -- is develop our land use and not get ahead of the transportation system. With this slide we see the current zoning. As Sonya said, this project isn't new. I was -- I took the project through with a development team in 2010. 1 think Anna Canning was with us at the time that this went through in 2010. It was annexed and zoned then and the concept plan proposed at the time was consistent with the Ten Mile Plan objective to ensure Meridian is more than a bedroom community, to provide a wide diversity of housing types and a mix of residential, commercial, employment opportunities with open space corridors. The Ten Mile Specific Area Plan was to make sure that this area did not empty out at the end of the day, something that's even more important in this day and age. In 2010 the Ten Mile interchange wasn't even completed and development on the east side of Ten Mile was a gleam in somebody's eye. In 2010 the city recognized that the street alignments that were proposed with that concept plan would be modified as the area developed and the city also recognized that the land use and the zoning boundaries would also be modified and this slide shows that those modified zoning boundaries, both the -- the proposed streets and the land use boundaries have been modified with these applications. The zoning is the same as in 2010, with the boundaries modified to be much less fragmented as -- than what you saw in the previous slide and to allow those zones to flow with the circulation patterns. As Sonya mentioned, the zones are R-15 -- that was originally R-40. It was a -- it was approved with R-40 with a caveat that it be developed at R-15 standards. So, to be very clear, we just said let's just go with R-15, instead of R- 40 at R-15 standards. The mixed -- and mixed employment, which is just south of the residential, extending all the way to 1-84. The high density employment along 1-84 and the community business district, which is south in the pink area on this slide, just south of Vanguard Way, which is the -- the sort of welcome mat, the entry into the overall project. On the next slide we do show the overall site plan and the phasing and on the site plan the remarkable line that helps define Project Vanguard is the Williams or the Northwest Pipeline that runs diagonally through the project. The landscape, the -- the pathways, the open space, the fitness areas planned for this easement assist the applicant meet the Ten Mile Plan's goal of connecting the land uses throughout the project. Not only is there a pathway provided through the Northwest Pipeline, but in order to meet the masters pathway plan we have got a -- a segment of the Meridian loop pathway along 1-84. So, both pathway components provide walkable routes to and through the project to our neighbors to the north, to the east, and to the west. I'm going to go back. Yes, as -- as Sonya said we have -- this pink is phase one that shows that Vanguard Way will be developed as part of phase one. The M-E or the yellow will be developed second. Those two phases will take up the amount of traffic that ACHD wants to see sort of put a cap on the development with those two phases until there is further extensions out to Black Cat. Page 43 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 17—— So, those -- those are the first two phases. Before we can go any farther those kind of developments would have to take place. Phase three is the remainder of the residential. This sort of teal to the blue in the north, the high density employment along 1-84, and the community business district. Finally, the purple is phase five. Finally, the circulation plan shows the overall landscape plan. I talked about the Williams Pipeline. I'm not going to go into detail on the street sections. Suffice to say that we spent a lot of time with Meridian staff and ACHD staff to make sure that the street sections were acceptable to both ACHD and to Meridian and so slide seven through ten I'm going to let the Council go through, so I can leave Deb enough time to go over the conditional use permit, but these next several slides give you some kind of -- give you kind of bullet points of what is proposed for those areas and with that I will turn the podium over to Deb. Nelson: Good evening, Mayor, Members of the Council. Deborah Nelson. 601 West Bannock Street in Boise. Here on behalf of the applicant for the multi-family development within the north 40 acres. Vanguard Crossing is a multi-family residential community that's within the larger mixed use development that JoAnn and Sonia walked through. It includes a variety of housing types, with 336 flats and townhome style multi-family homes with one, two and three bedrooms and 216 garden style apartments with one and two bedrooms. The community has significant open space and 18 plus amenities where, as Sonya noted, only four are required. The first phase of the residential portion here will be the -- that shown in red and it will include a mix of townhomes and garden style apartments even in this initial phase. Here is an elevation of the townhome. You can see the variety of colors and materials with architectural variation in the facade. The welcoming patios. The interiors of these units will have a high end modern finish, with stainless steel appliances and kitchen islands and other finishes that are consistent with the higher end residential product. Here is an elevation of the garden style apartments with complementary colors and materials and well defined and welcoming patios and balconies. The clubhouse architecture presents a striking look in the central amenity space, with classic materials, including Ashlar stone at the chimneys. A dramatic three foot overhanging eaves with cedar post support and large windows. Roll up garage doors open to the pool, providing indoor-outdoor access. This will serve as the gathering hub with workspaces, fitness facilities, and indoor and outdoor lounges with fireplaces. This clubhouse is part of a large central amenity area that also includes a large pool, pickleball courts, a play structure, and one of the dog parks along with landscaped pathways. There are amenity areas throughout the development, in addition to that large central area. In the northwest there is one of the dog parks. In the northeast a second pool and pool house. In the southwest another play structure and barbecue area and in the southeast a second dog park. All of these with landscaped pathways. The central spine amenity provides extensive landscaped pathways, including a multi-use pathway with gathering nodes and seating areas. This, along with the connecting sidewalks and pathways through the rest of the development, provides recreational opportunities and connectivity for pedestrian and bike access, not only for our residents, but for the residents to our north to connect them with the employment and commercial to our south. Here is some of the concept images for our amenities, including the play areas and pool, pickleball, and gathering spaces. The schools in our area have current capacity, which includes both the traditional schools and also two alternative choice schools. West Ada's comment letter Page 44 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 18 of— notes that based on their studied student generation rates for this region and projected growth, they believe that these schools will have adequate space to accommodate the development. ACHD has approved the TIS for this development and all required conditions of approval are acceptable to the applicant. This development will be building a key planned east-west collector road, Vanguard Way, and the west leg of the Vanguard Way-Ten Mile intersection all within the first phase. The mixed use nature of the development, along with the great pedestrian and bike connectivity, will provide these residential and employment uses significant trip capture that stays within the footprint of the development and since the TIS was prepared, ITD has expedited its Highway 16 work with the new interchange plan to be complete by 2024, creating additional trip distribution for the larger area. As was noted,ACHD did recommend a phasing plan, that we proceed in phases until there are additional road connections to surrounding properties to better distribute trips. The initial phase of the development that falls within ACHD's threshold of 3,000 trips per day for a single access on Vanguard Way will include the areas that are crosshatched here. The red portion of the multi-family with 366 units and all of the mixed employment zone to itself. That will -- they will both proceed within the initial phase that are part of the initial cap from ACHD. Subsequent phases cannot proceed until there is additional access and there is an additional traffic study. Importantly, the development applications that are before you tonight have significantly less trip generation than the development that is already approved with the annexation, zoning, and development agreement on the property now. That's because there has been a reduction in residential units and a change in the mix of non-residential here and so it will be less than half of the overall trips and the overall a.m. and p.m. peak hour impacts on surrounding roadways. As Sonya described, we are asking for two changes to design standards in your Ten Mile Plan. The community is designed in line with the Ten Mile Plan, except for these two exceptions that we request. First we asked for flexibility in the roof pitch for certain architectural features. As Sonya noted, the Ten Mile Plan proposes a general guideline that recommends a roof pitch range within 4/12 to 12/12. All of our residential building primary roofs fall within that, but we have exceptions for our amenity buildings, which include the clubhouse and two smaller buildings that have a lower roof pitch of 2/12. This is very intentional. This is an architectural style and modern interpretation of the shed roof style that you see on farmhouses in the area that include a lower roof pitch. It's also intentional to create a gathering space that differentiates from the surrounding residential structures. The townhome garage roof also has a similar lower pitch in a proportional style and it serves an added function that it allows on the rear facade the window sills to be lower and, therefore, for the windows to be larger and you can really see that illustrated in the bottom right photo there where the arrow is, that you can see that by having that roof not slant up so much you are able to have those windows there. Second change we ask that you not require our front entries that face public roads to be elevated 18 to 24 inches. This requirement would prevent a fair housing and ADA compliant access to the front entry of our townhomes. The Ten Mile Plan does have other components that we comply with in this design, specifically to promote the human scale of the main facades and, quote, usable entries. We understand that the value of this architectural stoop is to accentuate the entrance and so we propose to do that through architectural design features, rather than by limiting accessibility. We do that by framing this entry area with Page 45 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 19 of— adjacent patio railing and balconies. With that I will stand for any questions you may have. Simison: Thank you, Deb. Council, any questions for the applicant? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: A couple questions. Maybe more detailed questions, just things that have popped out at me. I was curious back in 2010 what the purpose of the amphitheater was. Is that meant to serve like a civic purpose for the whole community or was that intended for the businesses? Just some context on that. Nelson: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, I'm going to let JoAnn answer that. She was involved in the original entitlements on the property. Butler: Some of the -- JoAnn Butler. Some of the amenities that were shown in the conceptual plan were conceptual and certainly if they were in that -- that area within the Northwest Pipeline they would have been open to the public. Strader: Got it. And, then, I was looking through the -- the landscaping plans, so I have a question around that. I -- we live in a high desert and we are -- we have county folks that are in -- that have lower wells. You know, they don't drill down to the same extent that accesses the same aquifers and there is a little stress on those folks and I do get concerned with -- love to see lawn where it's used. Love to see it on pathways, dog parks, stuff like that. I -- I have a personal dislike for non-functional turf around business areas. Just wondered if that's something you could take a look at, maybe see if there is some xeriscaping or something that's more appropriate in those commercial areas. Butler: That makes -- JoAnn Butler again. And Deb may want to add to this. It makes perfect sense and as we go through design review I think what we are going to have to do is address those things deliberately. Strader: Got it. Okay. And, then, just my final question was how -- I appreciate the change in density or zoning, although you would have been in kind of R-15 standards anyway, but could you talk about the transition -- the closest transition you have to single family and how you feel like you are achieving a -- a good transition in terms of how -- how that feathers from the multi-family out that direction? Nelson: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, our townhome units provide that opportunity, because they -- they provide a transition from the single family to our north, which is R-8, so it's relatively dense zoning to our north and, then, we have townhomes that have a variety of sizes, including from, you know, four to eight units. So, these are not exceptionally large buildings that, then, can kind of live in an urban format and create open spaces between them, allowing all of that connectivity and, then, that transitions Page 46 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 20—— down when you get to our centralized open space, the large pipeline that goes through, creating even more of that connectivity and, then, the larger buildings are concentrated to the south where you are next to the mixed employment. Strader: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Deb or JoAnn, can you just walk us through the timing of each phase? What's -- what's your calendars around each of those? Nelson: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, we can at least talk to the initial phase, you know, which is -- it's always hard to predict what happens in the market in the future, but for the initial phase where we have got what's cross-hatched here, for the 366 multi- family units, as well as all of the M-E, our expectation is that that would generally build out with -- in the 2024 area, at least the multi-family. The industrial I think is -- the mixed employment is hopeful to do that and that's -- that's the same time frame, as you may remember, as the Highway 16 is going to be complete and it's also within the cap that ACHD has imposed on this development. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Just want to talk about the roof pitch on the amenity buildings, 2/12 pitch. You know, we are not resort areas like McCall or Sun Valley, we -- we don't pay attention to snow loads quite as much, but yet we know -- what was it, 2017, when we had Snowmageddon and we had an awful lot of snow. I'm assuming there is going to be consideration for events like that, even though I don't think we require, like I said, some of our resort areas due for snow load. So, can you speak to that issue on how that will be designed to withstand an extreme event? Nelson: Mr. Mayor and Council Member Hoaglun, I'm sure the architects could jump in if they have got more specifics on this, but I -- I can assure you that they will be planning for that event. I think that -- oh, Denton can answer. Kelley: Denton Kelley, managing principal owner of Building K Ventures with the developer. Thank you for having us tonight. To answer that question I mean, obviously, it would be zoned to code -- minimum -- you know, kind of the code minimum and, then, also take in consideration, you know, kind of the outlier events like you had in 2017. But we are -- we are the last people in the world that want to have an issue with our structure. We are long-term owners, we tend to build and own forever, so I can assure you it will be built in a structurally integrity that would withstand any kind of event like that, so -- Page 47 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 21 of 28 Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: So, talking about that are -- are the pictures that we are looking at on the screen, is that what they are going to look like or is that what they -- what were -- what was originally proposed and all the crazy lines are telling us what it's going to look like? Kelley: Yeah. Yeah. Those are just diagrammatic lines, kind of pointing out things. But the --the overall color, look, feel, materiality will stay the same for the most part. Through design review I'm sure there will be some -- some modifications that would happen through design review, but this is the design intent that you see in front of you, minus the diagrammatic lines, of course. Bernt: All right. Yeah, I get that. So, I guess I -- I guess I -- I would like to see what the -- the roof pitch will actually look like. Kelley: Are you -- are you talking about on the clubhouse or on the residential building? Bernt: Residential. Kelley: So, the residential buildings are compliant with the Ten Mile Specific Plan guidelines, with the exception of the roof you see there where the red arrow is -- Bernt: Yeah. Kelley: -- that's a -- I think a three and 12 roof and the reason that has a slightly lower pitch is to accommodate a larger window and a lower window sill, to keep all those windows kind of in a line, if you will. So, it's just to accommodate a constraint that our design creates. Bernt: Mr. Mayor. But what I'm looking at is the actual picture of what it's going to look like; correct? Kelley: Yes. Bernt: Okay. Nelson: Council Member Bernt, you might look at that bottom left picture. You can see with that side profile you can really see that garage shed roof and, then, the bottom right picture illustrates the impact of that height creep up the -- the rear facade and you can also see, if you compare the -- the clubhouse on the top left and the roof line on the top right, you can see the top right is the residential and the clubhouse has the lower pitch that we are trying to differentiate. Page 48 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 22—— Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Nelson: Okay. Simison: Thank you very much. Nelson: Thank you. Simison: Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we did. First was Garrett Scott, who is online, if he still wishes to speak. Scott: Mr. Mayor and Council Members, my name is Garrett Scott. My address is 502 33rd Street in Cody, Wyoming. I am a member of the development team with TO Engineers, specifically worked heavily -- was very involved with the traffic impact study for the development. Deb hit all the high points with regards to the traffic impacts of the development and ACHD conditions of approval, but I am here to help answer any specific questions you may have. Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, anybody else? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, that was the only advance, but there are -- there is another person online as well. Okay. Yeah. Well, if you can unmute T.J. Winger. Winger: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Members. Can you hear me? Simison: Yes, we can. Winger: Thank you. Just wanted to take a moment and add a little bit to the two items for consideration from an architectural perspective. As you know you see a lot of these communities and one of the real concerns is wayfinding and some of the items that we look at regarding children and these communities and keeping them safe and we have found over the years designing these facilities that if we can make the common area amenity building something unique, that that really helps the youth and children in the neighborhoods with their wayfinding and so we have done that intentionally to set that apart from the remainder of the architecture and in doing so, like Deb mentioned before, we pulled in some references from historical buildings and one of the -- one of the things that we are looking at is that lower roof slope. We will put snow guards on there and cleats to accommodate Snowmageddon. We --we understand that, so that the -- the roof handles that snow appropriately. We don't want that to fall on anyone. The other nice thing about that amenity area is that it has upgraded materials, so it will be something that's set apart in the community and, again, like I say, really act as a central location and help with wayfinding for children coming to and from school with a sense of points of reference within the community. On the back buildings where that red arrow is on the Page 49 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 23 of— lower right-hand corner, those units have bedrooms up there and so we are trying really hard to accommodate a second means of egress out of those rooms without overcomplicating and making a -- just kind of a weird roof design that accommodates windows that need to be --to be a certain size forADA. So, that small area of the building does have a lower roof slope there and that's the reason for that request as well. On the stoops, that third item, I love stoops and I love front porches. I love sense of place. I love streetscape, activating streets, and the intent behind the Ten Mile Area Plan and that is a really important element, it's something we looked at quite a bit and we are working with clients that have had problems with not following ADA ANSI requirements and so as we saw that requirement within the Ten Mile Plan we thought we should at least ask for that and talk about that as that's something that does conflict with code requirements that we have to design to. Excuse me. Design to. So, as we looked at that we thought the real important elements of the stoop and what that creates is that activated front porch, a sense of place, a place where communication happens, interactions happen, people sit on the front porch, those types of things. So, we -- we kept everything about the stoop, minus the vertical grade. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Is there anybody in the audience that would like to provide testimony on this item or anybody online? Okay. Then would the applicant like to close? Nelson: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, it's a rare hearing that I get to attend where there is not anything to rebut, so we will -- we will not undermine our good progress so far and ask that you approve the development consistent with what you have in the form of recommendations from both staff and from the Planning and Zoning Commission and we would stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Deb, can you put up two important slides that you had shown. I would like to see again real quick. One was this one. Bingo. You know where I was headed. That's a really important factor on this -- on this application. So, thank you for that. The other one was the map which depicted the caps on units until there is an additional access. Bingo. Okay. Thank you. I had no questions about it, I just think that's a really important part of this project's ability to be successful, so appreciate that. Simison: Okay. Deb, I don't know if I should tell you to sit down or not, because if they talk they are going to probably talk to you. Nelson: I don't mind standing. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Page 50 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page—of— Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Happy to break the silence. Appreciate you and your team's work on this project. It's one of those scenarios that there is an annexation -- I don't quite know if I would been sold. We have got a lot of development that's going on in that part of town and I'm worried about the impacts on Ten Mile, as I know you all are. Where the annexation has already been approved I really commend you and your team's approach to improve this project to actually mitigate -- minimize some of those negative impacts that may have -- would have come across had it been presented, you know, 12 years ago. I'm supportive of the project. I'm happy to be in favor of it. The timeline of it gives me good reassurance that once this gets built out to its full amazing capacity that the roadway will be able to handle it. I question a little bit the data around the schools, but I feel that by the time that this really starts to come online that we will have some better solutions related to schools, so appreciate you and your team's good work on that and would be in favor. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I need to pile on some discussion. I agree, I think we have some of those challenges to annexation. I agree with Councilman Cavener, this is a huge improvement to me from the project that was approved in the concept at least that was approved in 2010. 1 love this layout a lot more. I feel like the amenity package is better. I think the project flows well together for a mix of uses. Appreciate the work on it. The phasing and the kind of phasing a development plan and how it aligns with the transportation network I think has been as well mitigated as we could hope for for a project of this size. Wish -- wish we would have gotten a school site out of it I think ideally, but the impact on the schools from it -- it doesn't appear to be overly inordinate or burdensome, so I am supportive of it and appreciate the hard work that you all put into this. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Echo the comments of my colleagues and -- and in this specific scenario the request for the two design standard changes I thought also seemed to be appropriate, so I have no concern with that. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I have nothing more to add. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Page 51 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 25—— Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: The only thing I can add to the comments is I appreciate the amenity distribution. I think you did a good job of -- of working those amenities in all the various areas, because it is, you know, a 40 acre site, big complex eventually and -- and that -- that helps to have a place for everybody, they can just go out and have -- have some space. So, much -- much appreciated for that, so -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I would move that -- excuse me -- we close the public hearing for Vanguard Village, H-2021-0081 . Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I think -- Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: -- everyone -- everyone had their opportunity to -- to comment and I don't know -- unless we have something more to add, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony I move to approve H-2021-0081 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19th, 2022, with the addition to the DA of the -- granting the request for the roof pitch changes for the amenity buildings and townhome garages and the elimination of the elevation of front porches and with that, Mr. Mayor, I think that covers it. Cavener: Second the motion, Mr. Mayor. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there a discussion? All right. If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries. The item is agreed to. Thank you very much. Have a good evening. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. ORDINANCES [Action Item] Page 52 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page 26 of 28 9. Ordinance No. 22-1975: An Ordinance (ACHD Maintenance Facility H- 2021-0029) for Annexation of a Parcel Located in the SE 1/4 of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Ada County, Idaho, and Being More Particularly Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City Of Meridian; Establishing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification of 30.27 Acres of Land from RUT to I- L (Light Industrial)Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing that copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required By Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: So, with that we will move on to Item 9, which is Ordinance No. 22-1975. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to the ACHD -- Simison: Oh, wait. Pause. Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: My apologies, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to ACHD Maintenance Facility, H-2021-0029, for annexation of a parcel located in the SE '/4 of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Ada county, Idaho, and being more particularly described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City Of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 30.27 acres of Land from RUT to I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we approve Ordinance No. 22-1975 with suspension of rules. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and second to approve Ordinance No. 22-1975 under suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Page 53 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page— —— Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the ordinance is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 10. Ordinance No. 22-1976: An Ordinance (Moberly Rezone H-2021-0089) for Rezone of a Portion in the Northeast '/4 of the Southeast '/4 of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 0.159 Acres of Land from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to O-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next item up is Item 10, which is Ordinance No. 22-1976. Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to Moberly Rezone, H-2021- 0089, for rezone of a portion in the Northeast '/4 of the Southeast '/4 of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 0.159 acres of land from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to O-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Cavener. Cavener: I move we approve Ordinance No. 22-1976 with suspension rules. Strader: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 22-1976 with suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, absent; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Page 54 Meridian City Council Item#2. April 19,2022 Page——— Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move we adjourn. Simison: Have a motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:14 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 5-3-2022 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 5-3-2022 Page 55 E IDIAN;--- AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Counicl may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN - IN SHEET Date : April 19 , 2022 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic . Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum : • DO NOT : o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals , business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3 = minute time limit ( you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed is for this forum ) Name ( please print ) Brief Description of Discussion Topic 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Works: SolSmart Designation Plaque Presentation Page 4 Item#1. E MEMO TO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Jason Korn, Public Works Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Presenter: Jason Korn Estimated Time: 10 Min Topic: SolSmart Designation Presentation Recommended Council Action: None: Staff Presentation of SolSmart Plaque Background: Meridian has been awarded a SolSmart Bronze designation for implementing best practices to make it faster, easier,and more affordable for homes and businesses to install and access solar energy. SolSmart is a national designation and technical assistance program funded through the U.S. Department of Energy's Solar Energy Technologies Office. SolSmart recognizes cities and counties for identifying and removing unnecessary obstacles to solar energy development. Communities must meet requirements across five categories of the SolSmart Designation Criteria: Permitting and Inspection, Planning and Zoning, Government Operations, Community Engagement and Market Development to qualify for SolSmart designation.To date,more than 400 communities in 41 states,the District of Columbia,and the U.S.Virgin Islands have achieved SolSmart designation since the program launched in 2016. City staff worked to streamline solar permitting by developing a comprehensive solar energy application checklist and making information to the public and solar installers easy to find on a new solar energy web page. Appropriate Building Department and Planning and Zoning staff also participated in a solar industry"Best Practices"training to help the City achieve the Bronze SolSmart designation. This SolSmart designation supports the City's strategic goal of implementing financially responsible,sustainable and environmentally conscious projects the Clean Energy Resolution supporting Idaho Power's goal of reaching 100% clean energy by 2045. Page 5 Page I of I I . 0 E IDIAN.;--- Planning and Zoning Presentations and outline Page 4 rd Changes to Agenda: Item #2: Eagle Road Daycare Facility (CR-2022-0003) – This project is required to be continued (to May 3) due to an error in the public hearing notice. Item #3: Graycliff Estates Sub. No. 2 (FP-2022-0005) Application(s): Final plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 13.26 acres of land, zoned R-8, generally located west of S. Meridian Rd. & south of W. Harris St., at 684 W. Harris St. History: The preliminary plat (H-2019-0129) for this project was approved in 2019. There is an existing DA in effect for this property that governs future development. Summary of Request: Final plat consisting of 54 buildable lots & 6 common lots on 13.26 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for nd the 2 phase of Graycliff Estates Subdivision. There is no change to the number of building lots or common open space from the PP; therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Written Testimony: None Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions per the staff report Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number FP-2022-0005, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number FP-2022-0005, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP-2022-0005 to the hearing date of _________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Item #4: Graycliff Estates No. 3 (FP-2022-0012) Application(s): Final Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 5.25 acres of land, zoned R-8, generally located west of S. Meridian Rd. & south of W. Harris St. History: The preliminary plat (H-2019-0129) for this project was approved in 2019. There is an existing DA in effect for this property that governs future development. Summary of Request: Final plat consisting of 34 buildable lots & 3 common lots on 5.25 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for the rd 3 phase of Graycliff Estates Subdivision. There is no change to the number of building lots & the common open space has increased from the PP; therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: None Written Testimony: None Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions per the staff report Written Testimony: None Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number FP-2022-0012, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number FP-2022-0012, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP-2022-0012 to the hearing date of ________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #5: Pura Vida Ridge Ranch No. 1 (MFP-2022-0001) Application(s): Final Plat Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This phase consists of 7.63 acres of land, zoned R-15, located south of E. Lake Hazel Rd., approximately ¼ mile east of S. Eagle Rd. History: The final plat was approved in 2021. Summary of Request: Modification to the final plat to change the lot configuration on Lots 2-28, Block 1 & Lots 1-7, Block 5 in order to accommodate a new product type. The proposed final plat modification does not change the number of building lots but does increase the amount of common open space by 2,138 square feet. The proposed modifications to the lot configurations comply with the reduced dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district approved with the PUD. Because the number of building lots have not increased and the amount of common open space has not decreased, Staff is in support of the proposed modification. Compliance with the previous conditions of approval is required. Staff Recommendation: Approval Written Testimony: None Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number MFP-2022-0001, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number MFP-2022-0001, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number MFP-2022-0001 to the hearing date of __________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #6: Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 (H-2022-0021) Application(s): Vacation Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site is Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands #1, located west of S. Eagle Rd. approximately ¼ mile north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. in the R-4 zoning district. Summary of Request: The Applicant requests approval to vacate the easterly 5’ of the 10’ wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. The recorded plat depicts a 10’ wide utility easement on the west side yard instead of the intended 5’ easement. Relinquishment letters have been received from the easement holders in agreement with the proposed vacation. Written Testimony: None Staff Recommendation: Approval Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2022-0021, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2022-0021, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2022-0021 to the hearing date of ________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #7: Rolling Hill ROW & Easement Vacation (H-2022-0018) Application(s): Vacation (ROW & Easement) Location: The subject property is generally located ½ mile east of S. Eagle Rd. & north of E. Overland Rd. at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling Hill Dr. Summary of Request: The Applicant proposes to vacate the northern 1,005+/- lineal feet of existing ROW for S. Rolling Hill Dr. and existing public utility & drainage easements depicted on the subdivision plat for Lots 8-12, Block 2 & Lots 13-16, Block 1, Rolling Hill Subdivision. Exhibit maps were submitted as shown. Relinquishment letters were received from the easement holders in agreement with the proposed vacation. A letter was received from ACHD stating they don’t have any comments on the proposed ROW vacation as it’s consistent with their previous action on the preliminary plat, which requires the northern segment of Rolling Hill Dr. to be vacated prior to ACHD’s final approval of the first final plat. The ROW is also required to be vacated through ACHD. Written Testimony: None Staff Recommendation: Approval Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2022-0018, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2022-0018, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2022-0018 to the hearing date of ________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #8: Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) Application(s): Development Agreement Modification Rezone Preliminary Plat Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 115.26 acres of land, zoned C-C, H-E, M-E & R-40, generally located ¼ mile south of W. Franklin Rd. & S. Ten Mile Rd. History: This property was annexed in 2010 with a DA that included a conceptual development plan for the overall property that consisted of a mix of high-density residential, commercial, mixed employment and high-density employment uses. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designations: Mixed Use – Commercial (MU-COM); Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR); Mixed Employment (ME); & High-Density Employment (HDE) Summary of Request: A modification is requested to the existing DA to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. The original agreement included a conceptual development plan that depicts a mix of uses consisting of flex office, condos & townhomes, ground level retail with residential & offices above, research & development, restaurants, offices, parking structures, an amphitheater, and park areas with lakes. The proposed concept plan also depicts a mix of uses including a MFR development with garden-style apartments & townhome-style units at a gross density of 13.63 units/acre; flex uses of approximately 410,000 s.f. which may include office, light industrial & other uses such as distribution & light manufacturing; vertically integrated residential; commercial/retail uses; and non-residential uses such as a corporate campus, business & professional office space, research & development and limited retail & service uses (approximately 380,000 s.f.). Conceptual elevations were submitted for these uses as shown. The applicant proposes a rezone of 7.06-acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district; 17.38-acres from the C-C & H-E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district; and 40.33-acres from the R-40, C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district; and 1.10-acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. All of these zoning districts currently exist on the site except for the R-15 district which is proposed to replace the R-40 district, which Staff believes will provide a better transition to the existing SFR dwellings to the north. The rezone proposes to reconfigure the boundaries of these zoning districts into more developable areas consistent with the proposed road layout and concept plan. A Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots & 6 common lots on 115.26-acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E & M-E zoning districts for Vanguard Village subdivision. The subdivision is proposed to develop in 5 phases per the revised phasing plan; the first phase of the MFR development on the north end of the site zoned R-15 is proposed to develop first with the M-E second, the second phase of the multi-family development third, the H-E third fourth and the C-C zoned area last. Access is proposed to be provided from the northern boundary of the site from W. Franklin Rd. via S. Sunset Point Way & S. Baraya Way and from the east from S. Ten Mile Rd. via the extension of Vanguard Way. Coral Reef Way, Sunset Point Way, Umbria Hills and Vanguard Way are all designed as collector streets in accord with the Master Street Map and the Transportation System Map in the TMISAP. Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for future extension. Due to the unacceptable level of service projected at the Baraya Way/Franklin Rd. intersection & the cut-through traffic projected on Baraya Way & Sunset Point Way north of the site, ACHD is restricting development to the first phase with 136 MFR units, or a combination of commercial & residential development that generates approx. 75 PM peak hour trips, until alternative access is available to Umbria Hills Way, Franklin Rd. or Black Cat Rd.; OR, wait to extend Sunset Point Way into the site & Coral Reef Way to connect Baraya Way until there is alternative access available to Umbria Hills Way, Franklin Rd., or Black Cat Rd. The development is restricted to the first phase that generates 3,000 trips in this scenario, or approximately 366 MFR units & the M-E zone until alternative access is available to the site. Ten (10) foot wide multi-use pathways are proposed on the site in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. One segment follows the Williams pipeline easement diagonally across this site; another segment runs along the southern boundary within the street buffer along I-84. The Park’s Dept. has requested a pathway connection be provided between the pipeline pathway & the nearby sidewalk along Coral Reef Way. A pedestrian circulation plan is proposed that depicts all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways planned throughout the site in accord with the TMISAP for mixed use areas. A CUP is proposed for a MFR development consisting of 552 dwelling units with a mix of 3-story apartments and 2-story flats and townhome-style buildings ranging from 758 to 1,693 s.f. on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. A 9,368 square foot single- story clubhouse is proposed with amenities along with two (2) other amenity buildings. Nine (9) garden-style apartment buildings containing a total of 216 units and 51 flats and townhome-style buildings are proposed containing a total of 336 units with a mix of 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom units. Common open space & site amenities are proposed in accord with UDC standards. A total of 7.5 acres of common open space is required; a total of 8.99 acres is proposed. A minimum of 4 amenities are required; amenities from all of the required categories are proposed as follows: a clubhouse with a swimming pool, hot tub and cabanas; an outdoor kitchen and dining area; fitness lounge, lawn games and firepit lounge; pickleball court; children’s play area; dog parks; a smaller swimming pool, picnic shelter and fire pit lounge; art; pedestrian walkways; 10-foot wide sidewalks along the collector street (Vanguard); and an amenity area with a BBQ lounge. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed apartment, flat and townhome-style multi-family and clubhouse buildings. Building materials consist of vertical & horizontal hardie plank siding in light gray, green and wood colors; stucco in dark gray and off-white colors; and vertical western red cedar siding with cedar posts and beams and asphalt shingles. These elevations are not approved – final design is required to comply with the design guidelines in the TMISAP and the design standards in the ASM. Commission Recommendation: Approval w/conditions in the staff report Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: JoAnn Butler, Deb Nelson, Garret Scott, T.J. Winger ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: JoAnn Butler, Applicant’s Representative v. Key Issue(s): The Applicant requests a couple of alternatives to the design guidelines in the TMISAP pertaining to roof pitches and front stoops in the multi-family portion of the development. The Plan calls for roof pitches ranging from 4:12 to 12:12; the Applicant requests the allowance of a lower pitch for the community clubhouse amenity buildings of 2:12 and for the townhome garages of 3:12 to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level. Front stoops are desired in the Plan for buildings that face public streets of 18” to 24” above grade; due to concerns pertaining to compliance with ADA requirements, the Applicant proposes patios instead with railings that frames off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies. TJ Winger (part of the architecture team for this project) testified in favor of the roof pitches and front porches proposed in lieu of stoops for sense of place within the community – it’s his opinion they meet the intent of the guidelines. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The Applicant’s request for lower roof pitches for certain structures; and for front stoops to not be required per the design guidelines in the Plan; ii. Preference for more commercial to develop first rather than residential to create more jobs. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. The Commission was supportive of the Applicant’s request for lower roof pitches in the multi-family portion of the development (i.e. 2:12 on amenity buildings and 3:12 on townhome garages) and for the design guideline pertaining to front stoops to not be required. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: If Council agrees with the Applicant’s request for lower roof pitches for certain buildings and for covered front patios to be provided instead of stoops, it should be memorialized in the DA. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2021-0081, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2021-0081, as presented during the hearing on April 19, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2021-0081 to the hearing date of ________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) City Council Meeting April 19, 2022 Item #3: Graycliff Estates #2 Item #4: Graycliff Estates #3 Item #5: Pura Vida Ridge Ranch #1 Final PlatProposed Final PlatApproved Item #6: Sky Mesa Highlands #1Easement Vacation Item #7: Rolling Hill Right& Easement VacationWay -of- ROW VacationVacationEasement Item #8: Vanguard Village AERIALZONINGFLUM Existing Conceptual Development Plans Included in DA’s Proposed Conceptual Development Plan Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations for Vertically Integrated Residential/Commercial (Not Approved) Conceptual Elevations for Commercial Development Zoning Proposed with Rezone Proposed Preliminary Plat & Phasing Plan (Revised) Existing Streets in Baraya Sub. to the north & Proposed Connections Proposed Landscape Plan Proposed Circulation Plan Proposed Site Plan & Landscape Plan for MultiFamily Development- Proposed Open Space Exhibit for MultiFamily Development (Revised)- Proposed Site Amenity Exhibit for MultiFamily Development- Proposed Conceptual (Not Approved)Garden Style ApartmentsBuilding Elevations for Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations for Townhome Style Units (Not Approved) Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations for Townhome Style Units (Not Approved) Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations for Clubhouse (Not Approved) 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Eagle Road Daycare Facility (CR-2022-0003) by 814 Development, LLC, Located at 3060 S. Eagle Rd. Application Requires Continuance A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision pertaining to the Unified Development Code (Table 11-213-3) requirement for a 25-foot-wide buffer to be provided in the C-C zoning district along the northern property boundary adjacent to a residential use. Page 6 Item#2. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Public Hearing for Eagle Road Daycare Facility (CR-2022-0003) by 814 Development, LLC, Located at 3060 S. Eagle Rd. A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision pertaining to the Unified Development Code (Table 11-2B-3) requirement for a 25-foot-wide buffer to be provided in the C-C zoning district along the northern property boundary adjacent to a residential use. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at the City Council Public Hearing Page 7 Item#2. Mayor Robert E.Simison E IDIAN City Council Members: r�� Treg 8ernt Brad Haaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreauit Luke Cavener Liz Strader April 6,2022 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor&City Council CC: City Clerk, City Attorney FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner RE: Eagle Road Daycare Facility—CR-2022-0003 History: The Planning&Zoning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) (H-2022-0007) for a daycare center providing care for up to 216 children in the C-C zoning district on March 17, 2022 as set forth in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision&Order. As a condition(#A.4f)of that approval,the Applicant is required to provide a minimum 25-foot wide buffer along the northern property line adjacent to the residential property to the north as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C- C district. Because there is an existing 15-foot wide access easement along the northern property line benefiting the property owner to the north,only grass is allowed in the northern 15 feet of the buffer,with trees and shrubs meeting the buffer requirement in UDC 11-3B-9C in the southern 10 feet of the buffer. Unified Development Code: Per UDC 11-3B-9C.2,the width of the buffer is determined by the district in which the property is located,unless such width is otherwise modified by City Council at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners. A reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the applicable zoning district. Noticing: City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 4/3/2022 Radius notification mailed to 4/4/2022 properties within 300 feet Site Posting Date 4/5/2022 0ommunity Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102, Meridian, ID 83642 page s Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org Item#2. Next Door posting 4/5/2022 Notice of this request and public hearing has been provided to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the site; and proof of posing was submitted as required by UDC 11-5A-6D. Request: The Applicant has submitted a request for City Council review of the Commission's decision in this matter. The Applicant proposes to install a 6-foot tall sight-obscuring privacy fence along the northern property line with no landscaping within the buffer area as shown on the revised site plan below. •I I EIGHT f I -PROPOSED BUILDING I POPOSMLOTB I BWIL IN3 I MERIDIAN(S)IN / 49.9%89.FI } I ... 1,1W it- _ _t.._ CHILD CARE CENTER I II I I I I I ` rIr I � wwawvna ! •I E + 6 �I IIII Er106TNG J I ° SITE PLAM CONCEPT e.G�GT 2 Page 9 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Graycliff Estates Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2022-0005) by KB Home, Located at 684 W. Harris St. Page 19 Item#3. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: March 8, 2022 Topic: Final Plat for Graycliff Estates Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2022-0005) by KB Home, Located at 684 W. Harris St. Request: Final Plat consisting of 54 building lots and 6 common lots on 13.26 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Page 20 Item#3. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/19/2022 W VICTORY ROM DATE: LiContinued from 4/5/2022 TO: Mayor&City Council y FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 o SUBJECT: FP-2022-0005 EN.PHASE 1 � � s - a Graycliff Estates No. 2 LOCATION: 684 W. Harris St.,in the SE 1/4 of Section 25,Township 3N.,Range 1 W. PROJECT LOCATION W n.n TV.0- I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 54 buildable lots and 6 common lots on 13.26 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for the second phase of Graycliff Estates Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Sabrina Durtschi,KB Home— 1414 Bannock, Boise, 1D 83702 B. Owner: Thomas Coleman,KB Home— 1414 Bannock,Boise,ID 83702 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2019-0129)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. There is no change to the number of buildable lots or common open space,therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Page 1 Page 21 Item#3. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 1/31/2020) GBAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT-MERIOI ,IOAHO-2Q20 -r D5y • " �--� mnxm mPUT _.—-' � �' •\ �—.•—.— aaEw I ,� L-r..rE Eu I Lo-r warn r �� llilt — I � 1 x • Ch O h s q xz: _._._. r•1 A ue r TO E n o z. 00 c �PP-1 Page 22 Item#3. B. Final Plat(dated: 1/6/22) GRAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO.2 BOOK- ,PAGE-LOCATED IN THE SE 114,AND THE NE 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 25,T_3N_R_1W.D M_ CRY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2022 -��, ® 9� wa7�6° it c�P d �= Q � •��9 '�!�a �- .. -• i� , gu LEGEND S �ry - P'.ae q =w°$x�o.�amvw o�wwn emlor¢nxw°wmwawiwwew 0 e i 3 ¢®Y�°iu H � °V© 1.rvtd. -- as Lan olutions lane wrveyirg and Consuldng e+`. rwuewM°e4T'esLe _cvw.e.dserwr.rrweM..s.�r.nn<.r...°..ur.M a�6 SHEET OF GRAYCLI FF ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO.2 BOOK_PAGE w w`.w'O Lan olutions Land Sun yirg and ConsuNing SHEET OF Page 3 Page 23 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 05/21/2020)& Site Amenity Details LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS T GRAYCLIFF ESTATES PHASE 2 MI W HARMST MERMAN 2 (SEC-NIYY) -0-PE REQUIREMENTS I-E—E N-ES I—EI-E.. El SITE INFORMATION ANCISCAPE 1111UGATION SYSTEM z M .uTa.o TMrx���.E.�.,� � t� �.. �9 �®��� � IUGFET-0E-WAY MOSCAPE MAINTENANCE MATU IJNE SEE SHEET LI U PLANTING IMSEND 0 'o Ei ul; ]Ui ------ ------- Page 24 Item#3. RANHNG G:GEM a . $ �.m I ILL E; I � s MWTUi HNE_SEE SHEET LI 01 In, �mm,£n,wn�xro srwwc . m�srnwxc-xuun-xw..c �..._ I 3 sAxaEeicxourocwmEwmxs `� ��° c�f y 5R El . I LI.03 Page 5 Page 25 Item#3. D. Common Driveway Exhibits NORTH ----------- .•.. Q 1----------I o O I � � I ?pafnno I oz<o na N 2p 0. O 1 Apn6vmf 4�, Z n Q r I I `� .. . _� m -n = C 1 20.0' W W W SET9RCK � � I I 1 0� C I nyo rL i am Q O V/ -----�' t—=— nZoK q a uf"i�^ r e ammo o ro --- — -- —i Nso > o oti mm� z o i 20.0 cal n _ zx"' � N SETBACK wo n ~�� 2 I N I I I I r > 1 No ZA 1 O m N ------------- � I---- � I I o~cam-. (0 I � I 1 pom I I 112.0'1 s I a vn 1 SETBACK 20.0' o m I [SETBACK Page 26 Item#3. r--------- NORTH I le.A I.' Ip 1 1 f oa ac"A _ 1 0 ��7 2o.D J o�>� Mm O N --i M Y vo a j 0Z -< `__— N __ 1 o r= I----------- C n 1 m 7l 24 d SETBACK s 1 2 C W.LYRA h o 1 1 — — M ci L — — — _o a � r C T�—� N N�00 ----p.T---I-- o CO o >z r NnM4 I a MAO<4 24.4' s 1 Z �l o n Y j SETBACK N j�ll In 10 N = I z � 1z 20.�' co > - 5.4 N n n f�+� m Mtn Cn a to azxcjl �flo 20.4' I W SETBACK r C I O o 00 SETBACK Q � o Page 7 Page 27 Item#3. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. #2015-112095, 1st Addendum Inst. #2019-086664, and 2nd Addendum Inst. #2020-066784) and preliminary plat(H-2019-0129)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat(on or before December 23, 2023); or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Land Solutions, stamped by Clinton W. Hansen, dated: 1/6/2022, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#8: ". . . Lot 1,Block 27 is reserved for a City of Meridian well lot. Lot 2,Block-27 is reserved for a City of Meridian Park,unless the City Council determines apublic park is not preferred in this development. . ." b. Graphically depict the ACHD storm water drainage easements referenced in Note#9. c. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number for the CC&R's. d. Add note: "The bottom of structural footing shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation." e. Include the recorded instrument number for the ACHD permanent easement line noted in the Legend. £ Include the recorded instrument number for the existing ACHD permanent easement graphically depicted on the plat. g. Depict the public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway across Lot 2, Block 7 and include the recorded instrument number for the easement. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Kimley Horn, dated 01/14/2022,included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. The street buffer along S. Oakbriar Way shall include shrubs and other vegetative groundcover; and trees shall be depicted within the buffer south of W. Learmont St. outside of the Sundell lateral easement as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.3 and as depicted on the preliminary plat landscape plan. Revise the Landscape Requirements table accordingly. b. Depict shrubs and other vegetative groundcover along all pathways as set forth in UDC 11- 313-12C.2. c. Include the total linear footage of parkways(minus 26' for each driveway) and the required vs. provided number of trees in the Landscape Requirements table.In areas where there is an ACHD storm water drainage easement that prohibits trees, the required trees shall be placed elsewhere on the site. d. Depict landscaping within Lot 2,Block 7 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3E; and a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway with landscaping along the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C.Note: The improvements in this lot are not required Page 28 Item#3. to be installed until the larger park area develops. If the City Council determines a public park is not preferred in this development, the area shall be developed as private open space for the development. A copy of the revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. Note:Alternative Compliance to UDC 11-3B-12Cfor the landscaping(i.e. trees) required adjacent to the multi-use pathway and to UDC 11-3G-3E.2 for the landscaping(i.e. trees) required within common open space within the Williams pipeline easement on Lot 2, Block 7 was previously approved with H-2018-0054.A total of 35 additional trees were required to be provided within the development(or within another City park as determined appropriate by the Planning Division and Park's Department) based on the calculations provided. 6. All development within the Williams Northwest Pipeline easement must adhere to the most current standards in the Williams Gas Pipeline Developers' Handbook. 7. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. 8. Future homes within the development shall be generally consistent with the building elevations referenced in the Development Agreement(Inst. #2020-066784). 9. The rear and/or side elevations of 2-story homes abutting the collector streets(W.Harris St. and S. Oakbriar Way)on Lots 14-15,Block 1 and Lots 21-32,Block 5, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step- backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 10. Common driveways shall be paved with a surface with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.4. 11. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8; a copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 12. Homes on Lots 11-13 and 21-23,Block 5 shall comply with the setbacks depicted on the common driveway exhibits in Section V.D. 13. The well lot(i.e. Lot 1,Block 7) shall be conveyed to the City of Meridian by deed after the plat is recorded,prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the development. 14. The City park lot(i.e. Lot 2,Block 7) shall be conveyed to the City of Meridian by deed at such time as the larger park area is also conveyed to the City that lies in the adjacent Brundage Estates and Biltmore Estates subdivisions. If determined by the City Council that a public park is not preferred in this development,this lot shall be improved as private open space for the development. In the interim,this lot shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association and kept free of weeds. 15. A surety valid for a period of three(3)years shall be submitted to the City for the 10' wide multi- use pathway, landscaping and irrigation improvements on Lot 2,Block 7,the future City park lot, prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer;the surety may be required to be extended if the remainder of the land designated for a City Park isn't ready to develop at that time. If the City Council determines a City park is not preferred in this development during the Page 9 Page 29 Item#3. aforementioned time period(or the extended time period,as applicable),the surety will be released and the lot shall be improved as private open space for the development; or, if ownership of the lot is transferred to the developer of the adjacent parcels for improvement as a City Park and that developer agrees to improve the lot as part of the future City Park,the surety will be released. Landscaping/irrigation shall not be installed on this lot until the larger 11+/-acre park area is ready to be developed that is also part of Biltmore Estates and Brundage Estates subdivisions. 16. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 208-887-1620 or Susan.L.Prescott(&usps.g for more information. 17. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 18. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Water valve spacing shall not exceed 800 feet. 2. Water blowoffs should be installed per City standard drawing W 13. 3. Manholes shall be placed in the roadway whenever possible. Manhole SSMH B3 and SSMH B2 are currently located in the sidewalk and common driveway and must be moved to the roadway. 4. Separation between infiltration trench and sewer main is 10 foot minimum. 5. The streetlight plan has not been approved.The streetlights will need to be installed and operational, with approved record drawing,before any form of occupancy. 6. No geotechnical report was provided with this application. A geotechnical report will be required to be submitted and reviewed prior to signature of the final plat. General Conditions: 7. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 8. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development,coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 10. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 11. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. Page 30 Item#3. 12. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 13. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 14. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 15. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 16. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 17. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 18. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 19. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 20. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 21. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 22. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 23. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 24. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Page 11 Page 31 Item#3. Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 25. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 26. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 27. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 28. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 29. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 30. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 32 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Graycliff Estates No. 3 (FP-2022-0012) by KB Home, Generally Located South of W. Harris St. and West of S. Meridian Rd. Page 33 Item#4. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Final Plat for Graycliff Estates No. 3 (FP-2022-0012) by KB Home, Generally Located South of W. Harris St. and West of S. Meridian Rd. Request: Final Plat consisting of 34 building lots and 3 common lots on 5.25 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Page 34 Item#4. STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/19/2022 �—Yw VICTORY RDL DATE: u TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: FP-2022-0012 Graycliff Estates No. 3 0 LOCATION: Generally located south of W. Harris St. and west of S. Meridian Rd., in the SE 3 1/4 of Section 25,T.3N.,R.1 W. SUBJECT PROPERTY w.AMITY RD.�� I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final Plat consisting of 34 building lots and 3 common lots on 5.25 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for the third phase of Graycliff Estates Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Sabrina Durtschi,KB Home— 1414 Bannock,Boise, ID 83702 B. Owner: Thomas Coleman,KB Home— 1414 Bannock,Boise,ID 83702 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2019-0129)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. There is no change to the number of buildable lots and the amount of common open space has increased,therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Page 1 Page 35 Item#4. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 1/31/2020) GRAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION PRELIMINAwYM1PLtL-!tR1at.N.N IDAH0-2020 ECT SITE ELI I PV.T NOTES ELI:I LT -T- I LT Si`I .' 'fir '�+,r� ��;� ��•` m� � 3 �. TM n 9. +g• _�� fl[` aJ 4 $ II I' ET ti m. �� s�`•, j j C'3 4 sae _ •1 'a •�• � - _ *�I y�� _ _ - - - -: � LeLyy' ► aa, ...a. ez: _.w.U. 2 'E•' o .. , •-', _ ..e m a •iT nln...�T TEE1 El �Q J. Ei I L =n m__ ___._ •W.- T I A R A EET ER Page 36 Item#4. B. Final Plat(dated: 2/11/22) GRAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 3 BOOK_,PAGE_ LOCATED IN THE NN1114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 25,T.3N.,RAW.,B.M. CITY OF MERICIAN.ADA COUNTY,IDAHO UEGEM 2022 ra �.0,� �+� wsn,r is.n� ----- axuwe sr. Jy�� • o NCTES Z. 4 •1d1'J'@.':'6 `yT^ti acorn.°�wwMaa,.n ,ra,a xra�e.rc�.ar:.:.u.• e!,�'•• �sf,� :i7.��$'' ,�. .,�n.0�wr�n..uwvr.a�.wp.�..,�rm.a,�.r.rrK�isrF IN JR Y.ILwwrs7.. .rw_—,x�.ar,�ucr...,a.c,.a,..a,w.� wmnsrey s�� a >3 n � -- N61SrY 6'�3�RW s...rc..c,xurrar».nu wn�,�r.x�nu�s�� N SURVEY KARRATIVE� #.:� _.. ue ram i«a T,� uc+ uws r :Deus an,, In Judons r�.e � �,ss,se . - r.r. k' - •,,. � i i i s � Land Surveying and Conwldng +w .a�s+�rt r,r r,.rac ..r �•-K.rF wsr .,,r,sy °`"�„ �"oerr�}uF u wr xer,n m and as,rvn a sK moire s,r m - wrv,r•- ww.•`r'$ ten=, i�,zr � xin axe: SHEET 1#3 Page 3 Page 37 Item#4. C. Landscape Plan(dated: 05/21/2020)& Site Amenity Details LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS GRAYCLIFF ESTATES PHASE 3 i m � 4 uxos'nv f,Kxrs rwff xm¢ �Fa . g SSE y L0.01 RANTING IE6EliO Q ��L off.//�:��-^_ s ='•F V \J e d ,3 N 6I3 I u ' _• ...I ._....e ' S# fat s�'�'� ��.,. c 7 Page 38 Item#4. \ .,�. � neKp l�nr��v v�oT w m 4 1 IRfE n.axrrc aw STANNG m.m cweaxva � rr�EETAJOIG-MILhTRIIN[�"� L I .. mnewn�rt4t.r.; T Y F E H y yy„v, C E0111 YllTL PRIV0.CY FBlCE L I.02 Page 5 Page 39 Item#4. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. #2015-112095, 1st Addendum Inst. #2019-086664, and 2nd Addendum Inst. #2020-066784) and preliminary plat(H-2019-0129)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat; or apply for a time extension,in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Land Solutions, stamped by Clinton W. Hansen, dated: 2/11/2022, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#10: Include the recorded instrument number for the CC&R's. b. Note#11: Include the recorded instrument number for the ACHD temporary license agreement. c. Include the recorded book and page numbers for Graycliff Estates No. 2 noted on Sheet 1. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Kimley Horn, dated 01/14/2022,included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict shrubs and other vegetative groundcover along all pathways as set forth in UDC 11- 313-12C.2. b. Include the total linear footage of parkways(minus 26' for each driveway) and the required vs.provided number of trees in the Landscape Requirements table.In areas where there is an ACHD storm water drainage easement that prohibits trees, the required trees shall be placed elsewhere on the site. c. Fencing adjacent to the common open space where the Williams Pipeline is located along the east boundary of the site shall be revised to comply with the standards in UDC 11-3A- 7A.7b(1).An open vision or semi private fence up to 6 feet in height is required to provide visibility of the common area from adjacent homes. A copy of the revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 6. All development within the Williams Northwest Pipeline easement must adhere to the most current standards in the Williams Gas Pipeline Developers' Handbook. 7. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. 8. Future homes within the development shall be generally consistent with the building elevations referenced in the Development Agreement(Inst. #2020-066784). 9. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 208-887-1620 or Susan.L.Prescott&usps.goov for more information. Page 40 Item#4. 10. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 11. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The blow-off valve shown on sheet C5.20 needs to be installed (and noted) per City Standard Drawing W 13. 2. Sewer services should not cross infiltration trenches whenever possible. There are several areas that do not meet this standard. 3. Infiltration trenches must be a minimum of ten feet from sewer mains. 4. The streetlight plan has not been approved.The streetlights will need to be installed and operational, with approved record drawing,before any form of occupancy. 5. No geotechnical report was provided with this application. A geotechnical report will be required to be submitted and reviewed prior to signature of the final plat. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of Page 7 Page 41 Item#4. 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be Page 42 Item#4. sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 9 Page 43 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat Modification for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 (MFP- 2022-0001) by Centurion Engineers, Generally Located South of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. Page 44 Item#5. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Final Plat Modification for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 (MFP-2022- 0001) by Centurion Engineers, Generally Located South of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. Request: Modification to the Final Plat to change the lot configuration on Lots 2-28, Block 1 and Lots 1-7, Block 5 in order to accommodate a new product type. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Page 45 Item#5. STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/19/2022 -1s C-1N OUT Legend DATE: :H Project Lacfltar TO: Mayor&City Council R- FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 R-8 R-1-5 M1 SUBJECT: MFP-2022-0001 IR-�0 Pura Vida Ridge Ranch No. 1 " RUT LOCATION: 3727 E. Lake Hazel Rd.,in the NW 1/4 of R. Section 4,T.2N.,R.1E. (Parcel #S1404212550) RUT R I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to the final plat for Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 to change the lot configuration on Lots 2-28,Block 1 and Lots 1-7,Block 5 in order to accommodate a new product type. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Anna Canning, CenturionB &A Engineers, Inc. —2323 S. Vista Ave., Ste. 206,Boise, ID 83705 B. Owner: Darren Mann,Pacific Rim Builders— 1515 Cascade Ave.,Loveland, CO 80538 C. Representative: Joe Canning, Centurion/B&A Engineers,Inc. —2323 S. Vista Ave., Ste. 206, Boise, ID 83705 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat modification does not change the number of building lots but does increase the amount of common open space by 2,138 square feet. The proposed modifications to the lot configurations comply with the reduced dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district approved with H-2020-0064(i.e. minimum 1,400 square foot lots were approved). Because the number of building lots have not increased and the amount of common open space has not decreased, Staff is in support of the proposed modification. Compliance with the previous conditions of approval is required. Page 1 Page 46 Item#5. IV. DECISION A. Staff- Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat modification with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 8/24/20) _ I ._.._.._.._.._.-_ti_.._.._............ —A.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._._._._.._._.._.._.._.._.._._.._._.--._--- ._.._..........._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._RLrr --� RX WP 40, FUr FuT RUT xds I -1.1 �_ � ��.4` .♦ m ...—.,or ,� I T � is •..;� - � <.' - _ .,m.,._.,,...,m—.—�_>....,..... _._.,..�,_._.... RVT b [� t i Page 2 Page 47 Item#5. B. Approved Final Plat(date: 7/30/2021) Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 ..A PaRitW,Q"ryp,^p,srµµQ1357v aIs W.127YJ SIla41C W IIE NIRIIeF31 pLLYIER OF±ECRY! i2X.,R1E BOGE Wwtlh4N,CaV OF WERIO .M1 CLANK',IDN0 iECIKN.r-=-n/w�-e e1 tl�CRH-OF1 It A `®aT Y,��^ IX afuwc F Ixa.Ya�t sunC ---4 14�1�Oli�%SE��,�� Legend ----------— _._ _ _I--R,ec uWm FIRIQa I r' -]uq s¢imR,4s,m u,to,ur]II L A m NC'JOWI MN lu W]q rta xFsrt,Rrn n0_ S7 s m' as'�Ft]m,S ✓o � I.YnID 5 IE,1Be.�wL�oi1SMrsE RCIF11 141+i7et Rw+' q , l qI &WrGR1lMASTRCRi l2-�1- yy$` • '^•M 1u�iIlY,L�w� � lII•i _—_M1®1]Mt I _—_� ,35•, 21 °IF A IF curve Tuble �sr. IeIRl'94E errrr f,.�su R>ac a Dae chars w� cnab�, r.i W n elo« g71 ® 1 IF n seer ,xar asoon,• Itarxx Aso• „5C ,7ae• ,5A0' ld,7ee• nr,rxx ,x.r Ra'M11 ]R. � ,Yv �• ® � C., 1],ar 14W ]b'QW seS,AWW M14' Ltd YatS � a uur ac.erc eew'ee• WrxoR•.,Y ,az.. k (D 1 �' 9 $ 1S ra la4t' S,.9G W31'N' 9110'2]`SSx 2l87' ]gya' tg9.eC Y]'t 3',a- SSr3B'u� ]p.t p' ew ea xa4' sr.o rw'u sureoot w ,,.m• exw aIXw'oo' IrsrsSW „m' a�l:1 „ C,a 7e.ta' iS.N' SB'os'o,'R6r55'Y'W t„ ea'm' toR.00',aee'm' s,sfe't.Y e]_s]' c,s R].m ,wnv Rroexx n,rae RR� m.br d• Q , c,5 ,oast 1".w 5.4S'or rvsv]rnx OO.,Y �] . cu e>]d taa.w- lIXe•'p'xs�•0.snS+x e]s> 4 C15 MW s.e'aY ss�S•ost ne 'SM• —1— seS T., S.eY �Y ~•� !• Survey Narrative Ct] NA1' 2s.50' M'sBt7 55Y],'1 Sx 1 ,0.00' Cie nee' .e'.e' rersrmv aa.Rd B&A Engineers,Inc. now a�s�err srsoavw ..ew c-1mgEng r Flac— Md5 W.F—Ln Rat B.l Id.BR OS (238)3a3,M Porn KGe Rave m,ren S.Edineien We.t Page 3 Page 48 Item#5. C. Proposed Final Plat(dated: 3/24/22) Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 mm n Tx(i:5 wr j a xCl"fi ON,•,Ie.pp,a wnry O[1'w uimy N]n GwI ..INHO ARtfp a l ll i i pit MFM&i wwwraw n [Il`il ul:f.HAR11.nIl � L Und I aW n.cti IT- L.ln ktlFlT lPAS xr RFET = f � rev ti m lair n W" yw Inlf]C[ 2 Y b i66ti' 1f IT" =15" x r � 1 � p BrWY im I17Ar Rtff-A 19.5x a [nrir t1i0.' Ien �i x41r f3f 4 n �nY mfe' ml[ mlssYf! a� 1� `� it Cl zr4Yf-1[6ia rt�f ss[nY+4 P. MYs� �r Q exa ar1w 'N %W ='6{ Air i a�h�r r• �x III a apgr 4w I1x llrystt 11" tl• -W .w I s]7 uI6'afrt. Off m PMW iwa Ipa 9:.Mn WIr r -id -V .,r rii n[ Irmr � ser >xasrrrT ra ��hr�ars �� f.� � 'Tam B&A Engineers, Inc, xi w.I m r�ed moans rseF su xal rum wa nap,newm swn.ean ru. i Page 4 Page 49 Item#5. Pura Vida Ridge Ranch Subdivision No. 1 3lotes Certificate of Owner `�°or�r°°®.�wo`�� �•efmnr��a mor yoE cLw,en.efc wxi RL.4.a�nrx Ncxw:w,r.�.on�,.o a RFC RAC n.aaor°�I, ` ,'�`F-mow`xen���a'�.N`��.f�q•",•F�mor. �w*iv�u o�waa a�aLias Rr ff L�'..w�oL.n.o...N: arcs Y0+{hdxMPl f.ffrnw as'.fAu'w+Sx evxetw�waai vwf �il9ul+M gmrtil[iSF�U 1W ADfP....G Ef6 91.1'Sf%tK�A' _ Ifnui.t Isty moY[n wc+o4 foR m rnfS r Fn 4.Vcm ffOfeTeG•u<inon �]u[anrRlsBleR s�Lo a[b�.m K� iMf(Y nl%W wFi4 0°6JVY{LW.f+U fY�96.�6.4.ah.S n �P R rrt kY 9F B®.91rtff nxn�ff x imwm ffxeN spa mfN a IYnf�W ffwY���nn�[ff oe�uYeRw ooV91 R.r m fSE Im°d.1G Ir unity m1MY u SM uL n S� u,�eMP�EiMfp��+fm�eID[blul'Lwun�iac ew�iu.�fN.v OF >tEST Eb.SYy.}y"A—i:• lYat Imff ifm •F5Y a64•.4�MfOPn 4./4 0b5LC`.}M r4 hln hl.4RF4�7f.0/ a fwxeMk.uiv..v fxn.�.•rws R�n a ffn INlull fm xx N H n mt=-R .u.c dYIT` y phi 41<E Wl arty�f BF 4hGEl PoaenF=n�F]0.dH Nb eel.LFWT W4[OOIiSW l4 M&7 K w6No fffnfn �LP.s°{a�1?E a s'ntfe~°ufsn 4•lro nn.Sala R lia fm IwP f 7'v � u m96fo1 R nfs F1Wm sPff¢n[ nl it-m?oel �fRY>tY.Rn ffx• le.`l IING a nP�l.yEll aF[[AIBLIIE k lE tat r11.alto ttlt'N°F +,L 6lis161 n.tom iamufy.npl.�E fp M Ffr�peF ails`..\n aan a I].m na,°N!a r iui im lfi 1Pf�oC RmWol1 Ao x Nns ff it fua nN Y[ �•. °ff wetlddA Y IM FW!FL rani nll x Frt1Cae vfllG1S F MYI4-1. iaclN�xn n �n u fo u x usuoftaok soa 9Pu w eE lmv{Eo.W A X.0 saf°ai`f. R iwmfm.we R�Ir xi U . 911 '0 W{M hk oAWt+Er L-Ad $--eE+iW®W,4 0 sf E`T M9D wmr4 Mwx sAuc L�s t�aa � Ifnnvo•x 9IfnR A9e'uf^•� a LB.Ae MlE OF WO'.n_ _ Y..kv>N uof�v ri+o FP Yirmiafiec 4.r0 el6piEdl b.0-le-A•C C&rkOM+fc Nnnwfae to mvxi.esas fall isr d far�ff rc ar u»et m.r wa rm f pq R A a �1..'�-'a4 R�4 onafa fw.l u urn ffrf u�xnwaya �'rm m r ors .elV weF rc..a kN.':.2 1 rfm%'no ao�mall a'ur'¢�owfx[ fF7..tk-K{f-*Y%l.r R4.,IF'AM FE.n k"'1 am.lei n0 r. b`n.fi. °i�acnf ,dkwa aa,c m�+w i*e.or:` eause Iwo rr�: .OrX�MF mwren.ArR(uM aeet fuex ev/ �n nwfn arnieY.fw.f¢S non A,mn v fr o�ufx son wn floc-rye. +iw wra ri grew lac 'S•rOnY�9f W 4 iWP�.AW4�frt��ior°i nZin m�iva¢r.ci°Aueu rfna e¢a^'a!hm%el: uw:r�o�fw,aE lmEx'i ox d�o..,:s.�n rN a.r.pis r f >'o«rir'+°h�ll>Wm axc cc¢e.r�m*�LEft m.aaa�eex w ewo aufn>•.gsq`y p fnpggi-A iAl +.Dana ffsfslCk f mH v ti.A ic.f wFs r mfe na nG fmiau 3mN em �h �ff%yae�a�Pa W Nviw�l r4 iC LAPRi]f W4wli G 9r1 ui t�N IP#�ddn Mo-aw ono wx.n Nar e,dfen fs�R x Rvrfon x�mx a�lm�iec�n NP anfo nS rtlFkt Ea°0Yf V YI ui iY d Po ep uxaYfe 6 M vON�¢�a.uf 99K 'u Lrld i07(f fYRL�!fd r.;wd ndd h e anNRn �]V+AY.-0.E f+u� See Sheet 3 for Owner's Signature L B&A Engineers, Inc- CiwulHmPngr,ee:�Su o de Plr>tfen SXe w.Hanklin dd.BaLfc,Id.95�e eaxj�tveL P✓o Ydo Mdo Fen[e S.f4.boa fN.1 A�2dS Pagc 5 Page 50 D. Emergency Access Exhibit Pura Vida Ridge Ratich Subdivisioll Emergency Access Detail E. Lake Hazel Road C r. E E E r RNOVAKE BOLLARDS Lq-L EMERCENCI Al� E. La F 0 REMOVAELE Co Street B&A Engineers, Iuc- -TH F'RC.-IV F--Uiii FU 3—.101.c�,7fr-. T' Page 6 Item#5. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(H-2020-0064,Development Agreement Inst. #2021-042520;FP-2021-0043). Pagc 7 Page 52 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 (H-2022-0021) by JUB Engineers, Inc., Located at 3045 E. Brace Ct. A. Request: Request to Vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot-wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. Page 53 Item#6. E IDIAN:-- IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Public Hearing for Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 (H-2022-0021) by JUB Engineers, Inc., Located at 3045 E. Brace Ct. A. Request: Request to Vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at the City Council Public Hearing Page 54 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : April 19 , 2022 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 6 PROJECT NAME : Sky Mesa Highlands No . 1 ( W2022 - 0021 ) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify ( Please Print ) HOA ? ( mark X if yes ) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Item#6. STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/19/2022 legend — —- DATE: lei PFnjeat Lorca-iar TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Plannerix 208-489-0573 iu SUBJECT: H-2022-0021 W Sky Mesa Highlands No. 1 -VAC LOCATION: 3045 E. Brace Ct., in the SE 1/4 of _ - _ Section 32,T.3N.,RJE. _ I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19, Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Becky Yzaguirre,JUB Engineering,Inc.—250 S. Beechwood Dr.,Boise,ID 83709 B. Owner: Sky Mesa Development,LLC— 1025 S. Bridgeway Pl.,Eagle,ID 83616 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Per UDC Table 11-5A-2,vacation of a utility easement falls under"all others",which requires approval from City Council at a public hearing. IV. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 4/3/2022 Page 1 Page 55 Item#6. Radius notification mailed to 4/4/2022 properties within 300 feet Next Door posting 4/5/2022 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant requests approval to vacate the easterly 5 feet of the 10-foot wide utility easement along the west boundary of Lot 19,Block 1, Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1. The recorded plat depicts a 10-foot wide utility easement on the west side yard instead of the intended 5-foot easement. A legal description and exhibit map of the portion of the easement proposed to be vacated is included in Section VI below. Relinquishment letters were received from Century Link, City of Meridian Public Works Dept., Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas Company, Boise Project Board of Control&New York Irrigation District, Cable One Inc. dba Sparklight, and TDS Telecom for the portion of the easement proposed to be vacated. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the vacation of the eastern portion of the public utility easement as proposed by the Applicant and as agreed upon by the easement holders. Page 2 Page 56 Item#6. VII. EXHIBIT Legal Description&Exhibit Map of the Portion of the Utility Easement Proposed to be Vacated J-Yi&*W"o,K. ion a.era raxnvas Exhibit"A" Sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No.I Lot 19 Block 1 Partial Easement Vacation Legal Description Project No. 10-20-082 March 3, 2022 A portion of the tract of land shown as Lot 19 of Block 1 on the Plat of sky Mesa Highlands Subdivision No. 1 recorded in Book 121 of Plats at Pages 19016 through 19028, Ada County Records, hereinafter referred to as"Sky Mesa 1",and being situate in the southeast quarter of Section-12,Township 3 North, Range 1 Pas%Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,County orAda,State of Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 32;thence from said Point of Commencement,North UO'13'37"East,coincident with the east line of said Section 32, a distance of 1,338.07 feet to the south sixteenth corner on said east line;thence leaving said east line,the following seven consecutive courses and distances- 1. North 89°48'42" West, a distance of 40.04 feet to a 518-inch rebar with It yellow plastic cap stamped,"J-U-B 16642",marking the northeasterly comer of said Sky Mesa I, 2. continuing North 99°45'42"West,coincident with the northerly boundary line of said Sky Mesa 1,a distance of 647.34 feet to a 5/9-inch rebar with a yellow plastic cap stamped,")-U-13 16642",marking the intersection of said northerly boundary line with the centerline of the road shown as S.Cubola Way on said Sky Mesa 1, 3. leaving said northerly boundary line,South 00113'44"West,coincident with said centerline, a distance of 196,93 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar with a yellow plastic cap stamped,"J-U-B 16642"marking the ccnterlino intersection of said centerline with the centerline of the road shown as E.Brace Court on said Sky Mesa 1, 4. South 89°49'22"East,coincident with the centerline orsaicl E.Brace Court,a distance of 194,30 feel, 5_ leaving said centerline, South OD'I P38" West,a distance of 10.00 feet to a 518-inch rebar with a yellow plastic cap stamped,"J-tJ-B 16642"marking the northeasterly corner of Lot 20 or Block 1 as shown on said Sky Mesa 1, 6- Continuing South UU'l P38"West,coincident with the easterly line of said Lot 20. a distancu of 10.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar with a yellow plastic cap stamped,"J-tJ-B 16642"marking the southeasterly corner of said Lot 20,and March 3,2022 l0-2M82_tlti1ityEsmtVac.docx Page l of 2760 West Excursion Ganc,5uirc400,Meridian,ID 81642-5752 it www,iub.com r 209376.7330 Page 3 Page 57 Item#ti. 7. leaving said easterly line, South 89°48'22" Fast, a distance of 5.00 feet to a point on a line lying 5,€O-feet easterly of and parallel with the westerly Iim of I.ot 19 of Block 1 as shown on said Sky Mesa 1,said point being the Point of Beginning of this description; thence from said Point or Beginning, South DO'l 1'39"West,coincident with said parallel line,a distance of 107.54 feet;thence leaving said parallel line,North 75132'42"East,a distance of 5.17 feet to a point on aline lying I OA-feet easterly of and parallel with the westerly line of said Lot 19,thence North 00°11138" East, coincident with said parallel line, a distance of 1U6.23 Feet to a point on a line lying 10.00 feet southerly of and parallel with the northerly line of said Lot 19,thence North 89148'22"West,coincident with said parallel line,a distance of 5.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing an area of 334 square feet of land,more or less. The above-described tract of land is shown on Exhibit"B"attached hereto and made a part hereof. End of Description. J-U-B ENGINEERS,Inc, This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, If any portion of this description is modiFed or removed(including,but not limited to,the graphic portion shown on Exhibit"B")without the express written consent of Timothy Harrigan,PLS,all professional liability associaled with this document is hereby declared null and void. ENS Timothy liar PLS 17665 1 Date March 3,2022 10-20-082_I]tflityFgmtVac.docx Page 2 of Page 4 Page 58 Item#6. N89'48'42"W 647,34' L1 - i q I I � I I I I II i o f 94.3C L. BRACE COURT I � —.- - - S89'48'22 1= k I L4 L3 L8 I 1 Poeui f LOT 21 iI I I ` I BLOCK 1 L5 L7 I I I ui 1 — Tcn ' I 1 r I Vi 4 `ti in I I o d L6 } i I i I ro A t �w II � I w 1 I ��� �. ■ I k o 13 17665 z SCALE IN FEET ` \0 POC T3N ' T2N EXHIBIT "B" 5 4 SKY MESA HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION NO. 1 _ LOT 19 BLOCK 1 - PARTIAL EASEMENT VACATION SHEET SITUATE IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32,T3N,R1 E. 1 OF 2 ,.uarxaixnxs,mr- 60ISE MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNTY OF AUA STATE OF IDAHO Page 5 Page 59 Item#6. LEGEND — SECTION CORNER as % — QUARTER CORNER O — MONUMENT O — DIMENSION POINT PQG — POINT OF COMMENCEMENT POB — POINT OF BEGINNING — — — — SECTION LINE 9 ----------------- -- TIE LINE N EXISTING PROPERTY LINES -------------��-- — EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT LINES FZ- Z2 -2_.2,Z2-�Z — PORTION OF UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED d IN 6 o� J LINE TABLE N0. BEARING OISI. Ll N89'48'42W 40,00' i L2 Soo,11'38'Y 34.40' U L3 Soo,11'38V 10.00' L4 SW48'227 $_00' L5 S00'11'38,w 107.54' L6 N75'32'42'E 5,17' L7 N00'11'38'E 106.23' N LB N69'48'221-W O a A N '^ 17665 CF EXHIBIT "B" SKY MESA HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION NO. i LEST 19 BLOCK i - PARTIAL EASEMENT VACATION SHEET SITUATE IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER O`SECTION 32,T3N, 91 E, 2 QF 2 301SE MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNTY OF ADA STATE CF IDAHO Page 6 Page 60 E IDIAN.;--- Applicant's Presentation Page 4 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Rolling Hill Right of Way and Easement Vacation (H-2022- 0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling Hill Dr. A. Request: Right of Way and Easement Vacation to vacate the northern 1,005+/- lineal feet of existing right-of-way (S. Rolling Hill Dr.) and existing public utility easements on Lots 8-12, Block 2 and Lots 13-16, Block 1, Rolling Hill Subdivision. Page 61 Item#7. E IDIAN IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Public Hearing for Rolling Hill ROW and Easement Vacation (H-2022-0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling Hill Dr. A. Request: Right of Way and Easement Vacation to vacate the northern 1,005+/- lineal feet of existing right-of-way (S. Rolling Hill Dr.) and existing public utility easements on Lots 8-12, Block 2 and Lots 13-16, Block 1, Rolling Hill Subdivision. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at the City Council Public Hearing Page 62 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : April 19 , 2022 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 7 PROJECT NAME : Rolling Hill Right of Way and Easement Vacation ( W2022 - 0018 ) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify ( Please Print ) HOA ? ( mark X if yes ) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Item#7. STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/19/2022 Legend ; f DATE: J l 0 Project Lorca liar ' TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner r 208-489-0573y r C� SUBJECT: H-2022-0018 --- Rolling Hill Right-of-Way and Easement Vacation-VAC LOCATION: 925, 950, 1005, 1030, 1045, 1070, 1095, 1115, 1130, 1185, and 1194 S. Rolling - Hill Dr., in the SE 1/4 of Section 16, T.3N.,R.IE. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to vacate the northern 1,005+/-lineal feet of existing right-of-way(S. Rolling Hill Dr.) and existing public utility and drainage easements on Lots 8-12,Block 2 and Lots 13-16,Block 1,Rolling Hill Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Josh Beach,Brighton Development, Inc.—2929 W. Navigator Dr., Ste. 400, Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: BVA Rolling Hills No. 1,LLC—2194 Snake River Parkway, Idaho Falls,ID 83402 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 4/3/2022 Radius notification mailed to 4/3/2022 properties within 300 feet Page ] Page 63 Item#7. Next Door posting 4/5/2022 IV. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Per UDC Table 11-5A-2,vacation of right-of-way(ROW)requires approval from City Council at a public meeting;vacation of public utility and drainage easements require approval from City Council at a public hearing when a new or amended plat isn't proposed to be recorded to vacate the easements. V. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to vacate the northern 1,005+/-lineal feet of existing right-of-way(ROW) for S. Rolling Hill Dr. and existing public utility and drainage easements depicted on the subdivision plat for Lots 8-12,Block 2 and Lots 13-16,Block 1,Rolling Hill Subdivision(see Section VI.A below). A legal description and exhibit map of the ROW proposed to be vacated is included in Section VI.B below. The public utility and drainage easements proposed to be vacated are depicted on the exhibit in Section VI.0 below. Relinquishment letters were received from Century Link, Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas Company, Suez and NMID for the easements proposed to be vacated. The proposed vacation will not impact City utilities as this property was previously located and developed in Ada County. A letter was received from ACHD stating they don't have any comments on the proposed ROW vacation as it's consistent with their previous action on the preliminary plat,which requires the northern segment of Rolling Hill Dr.to be vacated prior to ACHD's final approval of the first final plat. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the vacation of right-of-way and public utility and drainage easements as proposed by the Applicant. Page 2 Page 64 Item#7. VII. EXHIBITS A. Rolling Hill Subdivision Plat 3a Ali m.1044 c FA5t cmw, 14 Ll 1111 41tar a 4t N qk Ow- _ _- - CAFT 3) 84` ■� j ICY J FY i' 'tL M 44 _ v o -4,- OYt1�t�1 Il1i ROAI a. m a Page 3 Page 65 Item#7. B. Legal Description&Exhibit Map of Right-of-Way Proposed to be Vacated E N Gam December 7,2021 Project No.:2&219 Rolling Hills Drive Right-of-Way Vacation Legal Description Exhi bit A A parcel of land for a right-of-way vacation being a portion of Rolling Hills Drive,situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 16,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M„City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho being mire particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of:ot 8, Block 2 of Rolling Hill Subdivision(Book 18 of Plats at Page 1202, records of Ada County,Idaho)which bears N90°00'00%a distance of 311.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 8,thenca following the westerly right-of-way line of said Rolling Hills Drive the following three(3)courses: 1. NOO'51'01:}"W a distance of 1,004,22 feet; 2. 98,35 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 45-00 feet,a delta angle of 112'29'41",a chord bearing of NM'51'00"W and a chord distance of 74.83 feet; 3. NOO'51'00"W a distance of 10.74 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of said Rolling Hills Drive; Thence leaving said westerly right-of-quay line and following said northerly right-of-way line, N90'00'00"E a distance of 50.01 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of said Rolling HMIs Drive; Thence leaving said northerly right-of•way line and following said easterly right-of-way line Vie following three(3)courses: 1. SOO'51'00"E a distance of 10.0D feet; 2. 8$.aS feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 45.00 feet,a delta angle of 112'29'41", a chard hearing of 500'51'0TE and a chord distance of 74.83 feet; 3. S00'51'00"E a distance of 10C4.96 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 13,Block 1 of said Rolling Hill Subdivision; Thence leaving said easterly right-of-way line, N90'00'00"W a distance of 50.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 1,299 acres(56,599 square feet),more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and{or rights-of-way of reco d or implied. �ptyf'L` Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. �s C'k rs w 12459 Q a � OF L. aA�' +'Z• -7•2024 5725 North Discovery Way-6cise, Idaho$3713-208.639.6939- kmengllp.com Page 4 Page 66 Item#7. Irntemstate 34 N94'0000"E Unplatted 50"O1' N00'51'001N _ S0951'00"E 10.74' c3 c� 10_00' Lot 12 Lot 16 Lat 11 00 p Subd vis on Lot 1n rD ¢ Lot 15 �Jn tatted block 2 o Block 1 La p n w = a o 0 0 U sfl o a W F Lot 9 C h— W N CY Lot 14 � m a,00' $ $ Lot 8 Lot 13 w BASIS OF BEADING r� N90'00'00'L 311,00' (TIE} N90'00'OQ�W Jewel POINT OF 50.01' Subdivision BEGiNMNO x c- I ` 0 200 400 600 Pian Scale: 1"=200' E N G I N E E R I N G 5723 NORTH DIKOYERY WAY SOME,MIAHO 33713 {., ry PNON£(2G9)63*}6939 Exh[b R it L—g0P.°°" Right-of-Way Vacation - Rolling Hills Drive DATE- DecemherM. PROJECT: 20-219 SHEE'F: Rolling Hill Subdivision 1 OF 1 NW1f4 SE114 Sec. 16, T3N, RIE, BM, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho Page 5 Page 67 Item#7. C. Public Utility&Drainage Easements Proposed to be Vacated 4 �ry I-A S T 49 73.14 0. 4q .31100' EAST NO , - I p Il 76.1 -- � A4.S r- - t u cd STPc PAO T QA- m CS i , 0) rA - -fAsr -- t 1 Z; ti ' o o 3rrOv' — FAST rn . . I 31054G' _--- FAsr--... __ - - FAST -,- -- Page 6 Page 68 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) by Meridian 118, LLC, Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. A. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement (Inst. #110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. B. Request: Rezone of 7.06 acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district, 17.38 acres from the C- C and H-E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district, 40.33 acres from the R-40 and C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district, and 1.10 acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. C. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots and 6 common lots on 115.26 acres of land in the R-15, C-C, WE and M-E zoning districts. D. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. Page 69 Item#8. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: April 19, 2022 Topic: Public Hearing for Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) by Meridian 118, LLC, Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. A. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement (Inst. #110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development. B. Request: Rezone of 7.06 acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district, 17.38 acres from the C-C and H-E zoning districts to the WE zoning district,40.33 acres from the R-40 and C-C and WE zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district, and 1.10 acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district. C. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots and 6 common lots on 115.26 acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and WE zoning districts. D. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at the City Council Public Hearing Page 70 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : April 19 , 2022 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 8 PROJECT NAME : Vanguard Village ( W2021 - 0081 ) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify ( Please Print ) HOA ? ( mark X if yes ) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Item#8. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING April 19,2022 �� DATE: Project Lorca Dior. TO: Mayor&City Council lei FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2021-0081 Vanguard Village—MDA,RZ,PP, CUP LOCATION: Generally located 1/4 mile south of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd.,in the middle of Section 15,T.3N. R.1 W. a I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant has submitted an application for the following: • Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #110115738)to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development; • Rezone of 7.06-acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district; 17.38-acres from the C-C&H- E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district; and 40.33-acres from the R-40, C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district; and 1.10-acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district; • Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots& 6 common lots on I I5.26-acres of land in the R-15, C-C,H-E and M-E zoning districts for Vanguard Village subdivision; and, • Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district for Vanguard Crossing. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 115.21 acres overall Existing/Proposed Zoning R-40,M-E,C-C and H-E(existing)/H-E,M-E,C-C and R- 15 (proposed) Future Land Use Designation Mixed Use—Commercial(MU-COM);Medium High- Density Residential(MHDR);Mixed Employment(ME); High Density Employment(HDE) Page 1 Page 87 Item#8. Description Details Page Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/agricultural land Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-family residential,vertically integrated residential, light industrial,commercial/retail,research and development and other uses. Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 8 buildable lots/6 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 4 5 phases(plat);2 phases(multi-family development) Number of Residential Units(type 552 multi-family apartment units of units) Physical Features(waterways, The Williams gas pipeline bisects this site hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of 8/17/21 attendees: History(previous approvals) AZ-09-008 Meridian Crossing(Ord.#10-1467;DA Inst. #110115738);ROS#7623 (Inst.#106170019 2006) B. Community Metrics Description Details P Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was submitted. es/no Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) Traffic Level of Service Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Gros s Access Existing Road Network Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ Buffers Proposed Road Improvements Fire Service • Distance to Fire 2 miles Station • Fire Response Time Falls within 5:00 minute response time area-nearest station is Fire Station#2—can meet response time goals • Resource Reliability 85%-does meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification 4—current resources would not be adequate to supply service (risk factors include fire-fighting in multi-story buildings&a large gathering of people in a single location) • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnaround. • Special/resource Project will require an aerial device;can meet this need in the needs required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Varies as there are multiple size buildings in which some will require fire sprinkler systems. Page 2 Page 88 Item#8. Description Details P • Other Resources West Ada School District • Capacity of Schools Approved prelim Approved MF Projected plat parcels per units per Students from Enrollment Ca aci attendance area attendance area Approved 0ev. • #of Students Enrolled Chaparral Elementary 552 700 730 1549 209 Meridian Middle School 1070 1250 800 1798 136 Meridian High School 17S9 207S 3343 2300 527 School of Choice Options Chief Joseph Elementary-Arts 498 700 N/A N/A Barbara Morgan STEM Academy 414 500 N/A N/A • Predicted#of students 83 generated from proposed development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services • Sewer Shed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/concerns • Flow is committed • See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section VII.B Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 2 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Complete plans for water must be reviewed by Engineering before final plat approval of any phase,the plans provided are not adequate for a full review. • See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section VILB Page 3 Page 89 Item#8. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map ffeegend hAeaRt igh - ffL��egend IPrnje t Laca�an a n ` J`Prnject LaeafK:m a.i...... Side 1 t y Hig - esidenfi I -Res `�..'q w C,.�nsi idrl<ntial $ _Ni # , . Medium ens,tyr %esidenf& Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend _g T Legend 1 - fPrnje-! Umc nor f Prnjent Luc o'or I I C R:15 C-N +_ fi R-1 R- 5 — Pk3nned Pflroe', lM1 M1 R. - RUT ` V-C C-C RR it - R- A. Applicant: Airalea Newman,Insight Investment Partners—3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Ste. 141, Henderson,NV 89052 B. Owners: James Zeiter,Meridian 118,LLC—3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Ste. 141,Henderson,NV 89052 Page 4 Page 90 Item#8. C. Representative: JoAnn Butler,Butler Spink, LLP—967 E. Parkcenter Blvd., Ste. 313,Boise, ID 83706 III. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 2/1/2022 4/3/2022 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 2/1/2022 4/4/2022 Applicant posted public hearing 2/5/2022 4/6/2022 notice on site Nextdoor posting 1/31/2022 4/5/2022 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan and Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates the northern 28.5+/-acres of this site as Medium-High Density Residential(MHDR);the northeast 21+/- acres as Mixed Use—Commercial(MU-COM); the southwest 20.5+/-acres as Mixed Employment (ME); and the southeast 45.5+/-acres as High-Density Employment(HDE). There is also a school site designated on the FLUM in this general area. This site is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP). A school site is not included in the proposed development plan. The school district states they don't currently own a site in this area and don't have any prospects of land to purchase in this area at this time; if a developer desires to donate a site in this area,the school district would consider it. MHDR: MHDR designated areas should include a mix of relatively dense multi-family housing types such as row houses,townhouses, condominiums and apartment buildings and complexes with a density ranging from 8-15 units per acre with a target density of 12 units per acre. These areas should be located around or near more intensively developed areas such as Mixed Use—Commercial or Employment areas in order to provide convenient access to these activity and employment centers to the greatest number of residents. A mix of multi-family residential housing types consisting of townhomes, flats and garden style apartments is proposed to develop on the northern 40 acres of the development area which is designated as MHDR,ME,HDE and MU-COM on the FLUM.A gross density of 13.63 units/acre is proposed,which falls within the desired density range in the MHDR designated area. Because the existing ME,HDR and MU-COM designations abutting the MHDR designation on this site consist of less than 50%of the site,the Applicant proposes the MHDR designation apply to the entire 40-acre portion of the site as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-9). The proposed R-15 zoning encompasses approximately 12 more acres than is currently designated MHDR on the FLUM and 23+/-acres more than currently zoned R-40. See Pg. 3-6 in the TMISAP for more information on the MHDR designation. The proposed multi-family development is located in close proximity(directly to the north and west) to MU-COM,ME and HDE designated land which is proposed to and anticipated to develop with higher intensity commercial and employment uses. The proposed residential uses will provide housing options in close proximity to these uses with convenient pedestrian access between them, Page 5 Page 91 Item#8. which should reduce traffic in the area.This development will provide a transition between the higher intensity uses and existing single-family homes to the north in Baraya Subdivision. ME: The purpose of ME designated areas is to encourage a diversity of compatible land uses that may include a mixture of office,research and specialized employment areas,light industrial including manufacturing and assembly, and other miscellaneous uses. These areas generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. However, a small amount of retail and service establishments,primarily serving employees and users of the ME areas or nearby industrial areas, are allowed. ME areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small,local or start-up businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. ME areas should be designed to encourage multimodal travel and convenient circulation to supporting uses located within the area. It's anticipated that buildings will range in height from 1-4 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000- 1,000,000 square feet, and that FAR will exceed.75. The ME designated area is intended to develop with a mix of flex uses of approximately 410,000 s.£, which may include office, light industrial and other uses, along with a 4 10,000 development eempe such as distribution and light manufacturing. Building heights will range from-2 1 to 4 stories. This area is located at the southwest corner of the development and abuts Mixed Employment designated land to the west and 1-84 to the south and will have access to a collector street as desired. Medium-high density residential uses are proposed to the north and high-density employment and commercial uses are proposed to the east with this application. The proposed M-E zoning encompasses approximately 8 more acres than is currently designated ME on the FLUM and 4 acres more than currently zoned M-E.See Pg. 3-11 in the TMISAP for more information on the ME designation. MU-COM: The purpose of MU-COM designated areas is to encourage the development of a mixture of office,retail,recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses,with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. This designation requires developments to integrate the three major use categories—residential,commercial and employment. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential. Development within these areas exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive pedestrian environment with a strong street character. The MU-COM designated area is proposed to develop with a mix of uses including a vertically integrated residential project and commercial/retail uses. The proposed C-C zoning is located along the northern portion of the east parcel abutting the Mixed Use—Commercial designated property to the north at the entry to the development with access to a non-residential collector street as desired. High-density employment uses are proposed to the south and mixed employment uses are proposed to the west with this application. The proposed C-C zoning is approximately 3 acres fewer than is currently designated MU-COM on the FLUM and is 30+/-acres less than currently zoned C-C. See Pg. 3-9 in the TMISAP for more information on the MU-COM designation. HDE: HDE designated areas are recommended as predominantly office,research and specialized employment areas and generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. Limited retail and service establishments primarily serving employees and users of the HDE areas are encouraged. HDE areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small,local or startup businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. They should be designed to encourage multimodal travel and convenient circulation to supporting services located within the area. Whenever possible,HDE areas should provide restaurants,lodging and other services in support of the employment uses. High Density Employment areas should be designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development. Buildings are anticipated to range in height from 1-6 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000-1,000,000 square feet with a FAR exceeding Page 6 Page 92 Item#8. 1.0. Designs that promote open space and parks are strongly encouraged. Structured parking is also allowed. This area is intended to develop with non-residential uses such as a corporate campus,business and professional office space,research and development, and limited retail and service uses (approximately 380,000 square feet). The proposed H-E zoning is approximately 20+/-acres fewer than is currently designated HE on the FLUM but is only 1.6+/-acres more than currently zoned H-E. See Pg. 3-11 in the TMISAP for more information on the HDE designation. Overall,the development area associated with the MHDR designation has increased 23+/-acres with R-15 zoning,the ME designated area has increased 4+/-acres with M-E zoning,the MU-C area is 3+/-acres less with C-C zoning, and the HDE area is 20+/-acres less with H-E zoning. Because the FLUM is a guide and not parcel-specific, adjacent abutting designations,when appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application,may be used with some exceptions(see pg. 3-9 Comprehensive Plan for more information). All of the changes fall within the guidance provided;therefore, Staff is in general support of the proposed development and zoning. Transportation: The Transportation System Map in the TMISAP depicts collector streets through this site that connect to S.Black Cat Rd.,W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd., adjacent arterial streets. The collector street network depicted on the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the Transportation System Map(see pg. 3-18 in the TMISAP). The Street Section Map depicts Street Section D(residential collector)as being appropriate to serve the local access needs of residential, live/work, and commercial activities within a residential neighborhood or mixed-use residential area. Street Section ❑ u.eivaucu,wncr The collector streets(i.e. Coral Reef Way& Sunset Point Way) in the multi-family portion of the development in the northern 40 acres of the development should be constructed in accord with this street section. Streetlights should be placed in the dry utilities corridor on either side of the street. The Street Section Map depicts Street Section C(major collector)as being appropriate to provide access from adjacent arterial streets(i.e. Black Cat,Franklin&Ten Mile Roads)into the employment area. Streetlights should be located in the tree lawn area and should be of a pedestrian scale. if is m e Lane UTW Street Section C " Curh•ro•nAdlstanu Page 7 Page 93 Item#8. The collector streets (i.e. Vanguard Way&Umbria Hills) in the commercial mixed-use area in the southern portion of the development should be constructed in accord with this street section with the following exceptions as required by ACHD: (3)travel lanes instead of(2); and 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways instead of 6-foot wide detached sidewalks in lieu of on-street bike lanes. On- street parking is allowed along Vanguard Way between the Williams pipeline easement and the eastern boundary of the site as proposed. Design: The TMISAP emphasizes the quality of the built environment and includes recommendations on the location, scale, form,height and design quality of public and private buildings in the form of building placement, orientation,and massing; types and design treatments for building frontages; as well as recommendations for the incorporation of art in public and private projects. The design elements in the Plan are intended to serve as the basic framework on any given project within the Ten Mile Area. The primary components that the design elements address include: architecture and cultural heritage;building placement whereby build-to lines are identified; heights and step backs;the definition of a base,body and top; and frontage types. The proposed development should be designed in the accord with the TMISAP (see pgs. 3-31 thru 3-51). See the Application of the Design Elements table on pg.3-49 to determine specific design element requirements according to the associated FLUM designation.Future development applications should include the applicable design elements. Comprehensive Plan Policies: The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Encourage diverse housing options suitable for various income levels,household sizes, and lifestyle preferences."(2.01.01) The proposed multi family development will include a mix of apartments,flats and townhome-style units with choices between 1-, 2-and 3-bedroom units.A variety of amenities are proposed for different preferences. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities."(2.02.01A) Several multi-use pathway segments are proposed within this development for interconnectivity between the residential and commercial and employment portions of the development and open space and site amenity areas. • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map." (2.02.01 E) The proposed project provides high quality, dense residential units that complement and provide a transition between the commercial and employment areas to the south and the Page 8 Page 94 Item#8. single-family residential to the north and is located along I-84, a major transportation corridor. • "Encourage and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, shop, dine,play, and work in close proximity,thereby reducing vehicle trips, and enhancing overall livability and sustainability."(3.06.02B) The proposed residential uses will provide housing options in close proximity to employment, shopping, dining and other commercial uses which should reduce vehicle trips and enhance livability and sustainability of the area. • "Encourage the development of supportive commercial near employment areas."(3.06.02C) The proposed commercial and retail uses should provide supportive uses for the proposed employment area. • "Require pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across large commercial and mixed-use developments."(3.07.02A) A pedestrian circulation plan is included in Section VII.C.3 for the southern portion of the development and in Section VIII.D for the northern portion of the development which provides safe pedestrian connectivity throughout the development. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development." (3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services." (3.03.03F) City water and sewer services are available to this site and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. The emergency response times for Police Dept. and Fire Dept. meets the established goals. • "Where feasible,encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways, and gathering places within and adjacent to their right-of-way."(3.07.01E) The Williams pipeline crosses this site; within the easement, a landscaped common area with a meandering multi-use pathway and seating areas are proposed. • "Require appropriate landscaping,buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors(setback,vegetation,low walls,berms, etc.)."(3.07.01C) A SO foot wide landscaped street buffer is required to be provided along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to I-84;Staff recommends a berm is included in the buffer. • "Encourage the integration of public art as an integrated component with new development." (5.03.01B) Public art is proposed along the multi-use pathway in the center of the project, which will take the form of sculptures that create points of interest along the pathways and speak to the nexus of the region's heritage and its future. Page 9 Page 95 Item#8. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed as required with this development. In summary, Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan for this area per the analysis above. V. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS (UDC) A. Development Agreement Modification(MDA): The existing Development Agreement(DA)was approved with the annexation of the property in 2009 (Meridian Crossing AZ-09-008; Inst. #110115738); the provisions of such and the approved conceptual development plan and sample building elevations are included below in Section VII.A. The Applicant proposes a modification to the DA to amend and restate the DA with a termination of the existing DA.All property governed by the original DA will be governed by the amended and restated DA. A new conceptual development plan is included in Section VII.A.3 for the proposed development and new recommended provisions for the agreement are included in Section VIII.A.I based on the analysis of the project below and applicable UDC and TMISAP provisions. Some of the existing DA provisions that are still applicable are also recommended to be included in the amended and restated DA. B. Rezone(RZ): A rezone is requested of 7.06-acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district; 17.38-acres from the C-C &H-E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district; and 40.33-acres from the R-40, C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district; and 1.10-acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district as shown on the zoning map exhibit in Section VII.B. A conceptual development plan and elevations are included in Section VII.A.3 and AA that shows how the site is anticipated to develop. All of these zoning districts currently exist on the site except for the R-15 district which is proposed to replace the R-40 district. The rezone proposes to reconfigure the boundaries of these zoning districts into more developable areas consistent with the proposed road layout and concept plan. The existing zoning consists of 27 acres of H-E, 25 acres of M-E, 16.83 acres of R-40 and 48 acres of C-C zoning. The rezone will result in 28.6 acres of H-E(an increase of 1.6 acres), 29.07 acres of M-E(an increase of 4.07 acres),40.33 acres of R-15 (an increase of 23.5 acres of residential) and 17.27 acres of C-C (a decrease of 30.73 acres)zoning overall. The proposed R-15 zoning is located on the northern 40 acres of the site,which abuts Baraya Subdivision and R-15 zoned single-family residential properties. Medium-high density residential uses are planned to the west and the property to the east is designated Mixed Use—Commercial. Mixed employment and commercial uses are proposed to the south with this application. A multi- family development containing 552 dwelling units at a gross density of 13.63 units/acre is proposed to develop in the R-15 zone. This development will provide a transition between mixed employment uses to the south and lower density single-family homes to the north. The residences proposed for this site will allow people to live and work in the nearby existing and planned commercial and employment areas in the vicinity,thus reducing traffic on area roads by allowing employees to walk or bike to work, shopping and services.Note: The existing R-40 and C-C Page 10 Page 96 Item#8. zoning districts allow a multi family development with a conditional use permit; however, Staff requested the Applicant rezone the overall area to a zone (i.e. R-15) that better represents the land use. The proposed C-C zoning is located along the northern portion of the east parcel abutting the Mixed Use—Commercial designated property to the north at the entry to the development with access to a non-residential collector street as desired. High-density employment uses are proposed to the south and mixed employment uses are proposed to the west with this application. Allowed uses in the C-C district should be larger scale and broader mix of retail, office, and service uses. This area is proposed to develop with a mix of uses including a vertically integrated residential project and commercial/retail uses. The proposed M-E zoning is located at the southwest corner of the development and abuts Mixed Employment designated land to the west and I-84 to the south and will have access to a collector street as desired. Medium-high density residential uses are proposed to the north and high-density employment and commercial uses are proposed to the east with this application. Allowed uses in the M-E district consist of offices,medical centers,research and development facilities, and light industrial uses with ancillary support services. This area is intended to develop with flex uses of approximately 410,000 s.f.,which may include office,light industrial and other uses, with a such as distribution and light manufacturing. The proposed H-E zoning is located along the southeast portion of the site adjacent to 1-84, in close proximity to Ten Mile interchange, as desired. Mixed employment uses are proposed to the west and commercial uses to the north with this application; l-84 borders the site on the south. Allowed uses in the H-E district consist of corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality uses with limited retail. This area is intended for non-residential uses such as a corporate campus, business and professional office space,research and development, and limited retail and service uses(approximately 380,000 square feet). Proposed Use Analysis: A variety of uses are proposed including a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project,retail, office, flex space,light industrial,research and development, and other uses; see UDC Tables 11-2A-2 and 11-2B-2 for allowed uses in the applicable zoning districts. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3 is required, as applicable. The proposed zoning and uses are generally consistent with the associated FLUM designations as discussed above in Section IV. C. Preliminary Plat(PP): The proposed preliminary plat consists of 8 building lots &6 common lots on I I5.26-acres of land in the R-15, C-C,H-E and M-E zoning districts for Vanguard Village subdivision. The subdivision is proposed to develop in four(4 5)final plat phases as shown on the revised phasing plan in Section VI.0 1. The first phase of the multi-family development on the north end of the site zoned R-15 is proposed to develop first with the M-E second,the second phase of the multi- family development third,the H-E fourth and the C-C zoned area last. The Applicant requests they are allowed to apply for building permits in the multi-family portion of the development prior to recordation of the final plat.The following condition is proposed,"Prior to applying for building permits,the following minimum items shall be completed: street signs are to be in place,the installation of sanitary sewer and water systems(with the water system being fully activated),a compacted road base capable of Page 11 Page 97 Item#8. supporting an 80,000 lb.fire truck shall be approved by design engineer,with written confirmation of such approval submitted to the Meridian Building Department." Staff is not in favor of allowing a Certificate of Zoning Compliance&Design n^ applications to be submitted and building permits issued prior to recordation of the final plat as the necessary infrastructure for development,including roads,should be in place first and lots established for development. Therefore, Staff is not supportive of the request. The Applicant may submit a design review application(s)to finalize building design prior to recordation of the final plat. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures remaining on this site. Dimensional Standards: Development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R- 15 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and the C-C, M-E and H-E zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-3, as applicable. A minimum building setback of 10-feet is required in the multi- family portion of the development unless a greater setback is otherwise required,per UDC 11-4- 3-27B.1. Separation between buildings should comply with Building code. A reduced building setback from 20-to 14-feet is requested for the multi-family structures proposed along Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef. However, a recent code amendment(ZOA- 2021-0003) allows a reduction of the collector street setback to be granted for homes that front on a collector street when on-street and required off-street parking is provided(UDC Table 11-2A- 7);the required 20-foot landscape buffer easement is measured from back of curb and the dwelling setback shall not be less than 10-feet from the back of sidewalk along the collector street. Staff recommends the street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef are constructed consistent with Street Section D in the TMISAP(see pg.3-21),which requires 11-foot travel lanes,6-foot bike lanes,8-foot parallel parking,8-foot parkways and 6-foot wide detached sidewalks.The 20-foot wide street buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a.The building setback must be at least 10-feet from the back of sidewalk,which achieves the ultimate setback desired. This accomplishes the street-oriented design desired in urban environments for a more walkable neighborhood and creates a more consistent edge to the public space in accord with the TMISAP. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3): Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3. The proposed subdivision appears to comply with these standards. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is proposed to be provided from the northern boundary of the site from W. Franklin Rd. via S. Sunset Point Way and S. Baraya Way and from the east from S. Ten Mile Rd. via the extension of Vanguard Way. Coral Reef Way, Sunset Point Way,Umbria Hills and Vanguard Way are all designed as collector streets in accord with the Master Street Map and the Transportation System Map in the TMISAP. Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for fixture extension. Streets: Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way should be constructed in accord with Street Section D(residential collector street) in the TMISAP,which requires (2) 11-foot travel lanes, 6- foot bike lanes, 8-foot parallel parking, 8-foot parkways and minimum 6-foot wide detached Page 12 Page 98 Item#8. sidewalks (see pg. 3-21 and 3-23). Streetlights should be placed in the dry utilities' corridor on either side of the street. The plat should be revised consistent with Street Section D. Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills should be constructed in accord with Street Section C (major collector street)in the TMISAP,which requires (2) 11-foot travel lanes, 6-foot bike lanes, 8-foot parkways with streetlights at a pedestrian scale and minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks (see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23). The Applicant proposes a modification of the street section with(3) 11-foot travel lanes, on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot wide parkways and 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways in lieu of bike lanes,which is required by ACHD. Staff is supportive of this change. All streets should be constructed as complete streets as defined in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-19&3- 20). Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): Ten(10) foot wide multi-use pathways are proposed on the site in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. One segment follows the Williams pipeline easement diagonally across this site; another segment runs along the southern boundary within the street buffer along I-84. The Park's Dept.has requested a pathway connection be provided between the Purdam Drain pathway and the pathway within the pipeline easement(see Section VIII.G). A 14-foot wide public use easement for all multi-use pathways shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s).If the pathway will be located entirely within the right-of-way, a public pedestrian easement is not needed. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): The UDC requires minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks to be provided adjacent to all streets with detached sidewalks along collector streets and attached or detached sidewalks along local streets. However,the guidelines in the TMISAP for the collector street sections(i.e.C and D) depict 6-foot wide sidewalks,which should be provided within the development at a minimum. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways should include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color,markings, materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg.3-28,Crosswalks). Pedestrian Circulation: A pedestrian circulation plan is included in Section VII.C.3 that depicts all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways planned throughout the site in accord with the TMISAP for mixed use areas. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are recommended along all streets within the development in accord with the TMISAP, planted with street trees and landscaping per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Street buffers are required to be provided as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7. A minimum 10-foot wide street buffer is required along all local streets (i.e.Vantage Point Way,Vanguard Trail) in commercial districts.A 20-foot wide street buffer is required along all collector streets(i.e. Vanguard Way,Umbria Hills, Coral Reef Way and Sunset Point Way)—the buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a; the building setback must be at least 10-feet from the back of sidewalk in the R-15 district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7. A minimum 50-foot wide street buffer is required along I-84, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3,which requires a variety of trees, shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover(see updated code for specifics).A 20-foot wide street buffer,instead of a 10-foot wide buffer,is required along Umbria Hills, a collector street. One(1) Page 13 Page 99 Item#8. additional tree should be added within the street buffer along Umbria Hills (east) per the minimum standard. Landscaping is required within parkways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Class II trees shall be provided in parkways in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E; Class III trees may be considered if the parkways are widened to 10 feet—revise the landscape plan accordingly. Landscaping is required along all pathways per the standards in UDC 11-3B-12C.A 5' wide landscape strip is required on both sides of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative ground cover. If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement. Mitigation is required for all existing trees 4"caliper or greater that are removed from the site in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Mitigation calculations are depicted on the landscape plan in accord with UDC standards(i.e. 185 trees at 2.5 caliper inches each for a total of 462.5 caliper inches). The location of mitigation trees shall be depicted on a revised landscape plan submitted with the final plat application. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practices as adopted by the City. The Applicant submitted a Geotechnical Evaluation for the subdivision. Pressure Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-1�: Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot in the subdivision as required in UDC 11-3A-15. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Utilities are required to be provided to the subdivision as required in UDC 11-3A-21. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Marvin Lateral runs along the west boundary of the site and the Purdam Drain crosses near the northeast corner of the site. If an easement for either of these waterways lies on this site, the easement(s) shall be clearly depicted on the plat.All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. Williams Pipeline: The Williams pipeline crosses this site diagonally within a 75-foot wide easement(Inst. #390283,#8018289,#8103052, and#8048122). Development within the easement should comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7)• All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7.No fencing is proposed on the landscape plan. D. Conditional Use Permit(CUP): A Conditional Use Permit is proposed for a multi-family development(i.e.Vanguard Crossing) consisting of 552 dwelling units with a mix of 3-story apartments and 2-story flats and townhome-style buildings ranging from 758 to 1,693 square feet(s.f.) on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. A 9,368 square foot single-story clubhouse is proposed with amenities along with two(2) other amenity buildings. Page 14 Page 100 Item#8. Nine(9) garden-style apartment buildings containing a total of 216 units and 51 flats and townhome-style buildings are proposed containing a total of 336 units with a mix of 1-,2-and 3- bedroom units. See site plan and associated exhibits in Section VII.D. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The proposed use is subject to the following standards: (Staff's analysis/comments in italic text) 11-4-3-27: MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: Site Design: 1. Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of ten feet(10')unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code. Building setbacks shall take into account windows, entrances,porches and patios,and how they impact adjacent properties.As noted above in Section V.C, if the required street buffers along the collector streets are placed in easements rather than common lots, setbacks can be reduced to 10 feet measured from back of sidewalk with streets constructed per Street Section D in the TMISAP. 2. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas,waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street, or shall be fully screened from view from a public street. The plans submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should demonstrate compliance with this standard. 3. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios,decks,and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. In circumstances where strict adherence to such standard would create inconsistency with the purpose statements of this section,the Director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative compliance provisions as set forth in section 11-513-5 of this title. The floor plans all depict at least 80 sf. ofprivate usable open space(i.e.patios or balconies)for each unit except for Buildings 3, 5 and 6— Unit C's—the Applicant states these units will all have 84 sf patios on-grade. Floor plans for each unit should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application that demonstrate compliance with this standard. 4. For the purposes of this section,vehicular circulation areas,parking areas, and private usable open space shall not be considered common open space. These areas were not included in the common open space calculations for the site (see common open space exhibit in Section VII.D.5). 5. No recreational vehicles, snowmobiles,boats or other personal recreation vehicles shall be stored on the site unless provided for in a separate,designated and screened area. The Applicant should comply with this requirement. 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. The proposed parking meets and exceeds UDC standards (see parking analysis below). 7. Developments with twenty(20)units or more shall provide the following: a. A property management office. b. A maintenance storage area. Page 15 Page 101 Item#8. c. A central mailbox location,including provisions for parcel mail,that provide safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access. d. A directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. (Ord. 18-1773,4-24-2018) A leasing office, storage area, and a mail&parcel center are depicted on the clubhouse floor plan. The location of the directory and map of the development shall be noted on the site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. C. Common Open Space Design Requirements: 1. The total baseline land area of all qualified common open space shall equal or exceed ten (10)percent of the gross land area for multi-family developments of five (5)acres or more.Based 40.33 acres of land, a minimum of 4.03 acres of common open space should be provided.A total of 8.99 acres is proposed in accord with this standard. 2. All common open space shall meet the following standards: a. The development plan shall demonstrate that the open space has been integrated into the development as a priority and not for the use of land after all other elements of the development have been designed. Open space areas that has been given priority in the development design have: (1) Direct pedestrian access; (2) High visibility; (3) Comply with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CTED) standards; and (4) Support a range of leisure and play activities and uses. Irregular shaped, disconnected or isolated open spaces shall not meet this standard. Although there are some irregular shaped areas, they are all directly accessible by pedestrians with high visibility; the majority of the areas are in compliance with these standards and the overall common open space is twice that required. b. Open space shall be accessible and well connected throughout the development. This quality can be shown with open spaces that are centrally located within the development, accessible by pathway and visually accessible along collector streets or as a terminal view from a street.Proposed open space meets this standard. c. The open space promotes the health and well-being of its residents. Open space shall support active and passive uses for recreation, social gathering and relaxation to serve the development.Proposed open space meets this standard. 3. All multi-family projects over twenty(20)units shall provide at least one(1) common grassy area integrated into the site design allowing for general activities by all ages. This area may be included in the minimum required open space total. Projects that provide safe access to adjacent public parks or parks under a common HOA,without crossing an arterial roadway, are exempt from this standard. a. Minimum size of common grassy area shall be at least five thousand(5,000) square feet in area. This area shall increase proportionately as the number of units increase and shall be commensurate to the size of the multi-family development as determined by the decision-making body. Where this area cannot be increased due to site constraints,it may be included elsewhere in the development. Several common Page 16 Page 102 Item#8. grassy areas are proposed in accord with this standard, which Staff believes is proportionate for the proposed development. b. Alternative compliance is available for these standards, if a project has a unique targeted demographic;utilizes other place-making design elements in Old-Town or mixed-use future land use designations with collectively integrated and shared open space areas.Alternative compliance is not needed; the project meets the required standards. 4. In addition to the baseline open space requirement, a minimum area of outdoor common open space shall be provided as follows: a. One hundred fifty(150) square feet for each unit containing five hundred(500) or less square feet of living area.All units contain more than 500 square feet of living area. b. Two hundred fifty(250) square feet for each unit containing more than five hundred (500) square feet and up to one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. 352 units contain between 500 and 1,200 square feet of living area. c. Three hundred fifty(350) square feet for each unit containing more than one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. 104 units exceed 1,200 square feet of living area. A total of 15 1,000 s f. (or 3.47 acres) of outdoor common open space is required to be provided per this standard and a minimum of 4.03 acres is required to be provided per the standard listed above in 11-4-3-27C.1 for a total of 7.5 acres overall.A total of 391,590 sf. (or 8.99 acres) is proposed in excess of the minimum requirement as shown on the exhibit in Section VII.D.S. 5. Common open space shall be not less than four hundred(400) square feet in area,and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of twenty(20)feet.All of the common open space areas depicted on the open space exhibit in Section VII.F meet this requirement. 6. In phased developments, common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units. This project is proposed to develop in two phases; common open space is proposed in each phase in accord with UDC standards for the size and number of dwelling units. 7. Unless otherwise approved through the conditional use process, common open space areas shall not be adjacent to collector or arterial streets unless separated from the street by a berm or constructed barrier at least four(4)feet in height,with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access. The common open space exhibit in Section MY includes common open space along collector streets; however, the minimum standards for open space are met internal to the development.A berm or a constructed barrier at least 4 feet in height with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access should be provided within the collector street buffer along Vanguard Way. D. Site Development Amenities: 1. All multi-family developments shall provide for quality of life, open space and recreation amenities to meet the particular needs of the residents as follows: a. Quality of life: (1) Clubhouse. Page 17 Page 103 Item#8. (2) Fitness facilities. (3) Enclosed bike storage. (4) Public art such as a statue. (5) Dog park with waste station. (6) Commercial outdoor kitchen. (7) Fitness course. (8) Enclosed storage. b. Open space: (1) Community garden. (2) Ponds or water features. (3) Plaza. (4) Picnic area including tables,benches, landscaping and a structure for shade. c. Recreation: (1) Pool. (2) Walking trails. (3) Children's play structures. (4) Sports courts. d. Multi-modal amenity standards. (1) Bicycle repair station. (2) Park and ride lot. (3) Sheltered transit stop. (4) Charging stations for electric vehicles. 2. The number of amenities shall depend on the size of multi-family development as follows: a. For multi-family developments with less than twenty(20)units,two(2)amenities shall be provided from two(2)separate categories. b. For multi-family development between twenty(20) and seventy-five(75)units,three (3) amenities shall be provided,with one from each category. c. For multi-family development with seventy-five(75)units or more, four(4) amenities shall be provided,with at least one from each category. d. For multi-family developments with more than one hundred(100)units,the decision- making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Based on 552-units, a minimum of 4 amenities are required.Amenities are proposed as follows: a clubhouse with a swimming pool, hot tub and cabanas; an outdoor kitchen and dining area;fitness lounge, lawn games and firepit lounge;pickleball court; children's play area; dog parks; a smaller swimming pool,picnic shelter and fire pit lounge; art; pedestrian walkways; 10 foot wide sidewalks along the collector street(Vanguard); and Page 18 Page 104 Item#8. an amenity area with a BBQ lounge (see Exhibit 6 in Section VI.D below). Amenities are provided from all of the required categories. 3. The decision-making body shall be authorized to consider other improvements in addition to those provided under this subsection D,provided that these improvements provide a similar level of amenity. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, ef£ 9-15-2005) E. Landscaping Requirements: 1. Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. 2. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following minimum standards: a. The landscaped area shall be at least three feet(Y)wide. b. For every three(3)linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of twenty-four inches(24") shall be planted. c. Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. The landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should depict landscaping on all street facing elevations in accord with these standards. F. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided with the subdivision improvements as noted above in Section V.B. Landscaping is required to be provided along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip along each side of the pathway planted with a mix of trees,shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover; a minimum of one(1)tree per 100 linear feet of pathway is required. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 8C. Staff recommends a minimum of one(1)tree be provided for every 8,000 square feet of common open space. Parking: Off-street vehicle parking is required for the proposed multi-family dwellings as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. Based on 222 1-bedroom units and 330 2-and 3-bedroom units, a minimum of 993 off-street spaces are required with 552 of those being in a covered carport or garage. Off-street parking is required for the clubhouse and amenity building as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6B.1 for non-residential uses; based on 9,368 s.f. for the clubhouse and 1,800 s.f. for each of the amenity buildings, a minimum of 26 spaces are required. Between the residential units, clubhouse and two amenity buildings, a minimum of 1,019 off- street parking spaces are required with 552 of those being in a covered carport or garage. A total of 1,054 off-street parking spaces are proposed with 665 of those being covered spaces(470 garages/195 carports) in excess of UDC standards.Based on 1,054 parking spaces proposed,a minimum of 42 bicycle parking spaces are required to be provided; a total of 48 spaces are Page 19 Page 105 Item#8. proposed. Bicycle parking facilities should comply with the standards in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bike racks should be provided in central locations for each building and for the clubhouse. The Applicant's narrative states an additional 94 off-site on-street parking spaces will be provided for guests,which totals 129 additional spaced beyond those required. However,ACHD is requesting some turn lanes be provided which will reduce this number. Private Streets: The Fire Dept. has requested private streets are provided for addressing purposes of the multi-family units. All private streets should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3F-4. The Applicant shall submit a private street application concurrent with the final plat application. Fencing:No fencing is depicted on the landscape plan for this development. All fencing should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7 if proposed. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual(ASM� TMISAP): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed apartment, flat and townhome- style multi-family and clubhouse buildings as shown in Section VII.D.7. Undated Rbuilding materials consist of vertical and horizontal hardie plank siding in light gray,and green and colors; stucco in dark g_ray and off-white colors; and vertical western red cedar siding with cedar posts and beams and asphalt shingles. Per the TMISAP for MHDR designated areas,the design of residential buildings should incorporate street-oriented and human-scale design and be located as close to the property line as possible to create a consistent edge to the public space and make streets more friendly and walkable. The closest the structures are allowed to be per UDC Table 11-2A-7 is 10-feet from the back of sidewalk as proposed in the cross-section below with the collector street buffer placed in an easement. TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONr, Structures should incorporate traditional neighborhood design.Front porches with parking behind the buildings are desired. Streetscapes with landscaped parkways with trees between curbs and sidewalks,street furniture and view corridors are key. Primary facades should include an entry into the building; entries should be located so as to provide direct access from adjacent public spaces, streets and activity areas as proposed.Where primary facades face a designated public space and another faces a parking area designed to serve that structure such as proposed,both facades should be designed and detailed as primary facades and both should have prominent usable entries. The space between a building facade and the adjacent sidewalk should be landscaped with a combination of lawns,groundcover,shrubs and trees.Mostly attached low-rise buildings of 1- 3 stories are recommended as proposed. -B ildirgs should be designed with elear-•,delineated bases bodies a-ad tops (seer). Page 20 Page 106 Item#8. Landseaped buffeFs should be pFovided between the pFoposed development and the existing single family development to the nor Ground floor elevations should be 18 to 24 inches above sidewalk grade with individual units opening directly onto adjacent rights-of-way with stoop frontage.Pitched roofs should be symmetrical hips or gables with a pitch between 4:12 and 12:12 and have an overhang of at least 12 inches. Public art in a high quality of design should also be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes. The proposed conceptual elevations are not approved.Final design must comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM) and the design guidelines in the TMISAP for the MHDR designation(see the matrix for Application of the Design Elements on pg.3-49).A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for approval of the site and building design prior to submittal of building permit applications.Note:Any variations from the design standards in the ASM should be requested through a design standard exception as detailed in the ASM with the Design Review application. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested DA modification,rezone,preliminary plat and conditional use permit per the provisions noted in Section VIII,per the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 17,2022. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject RZ, PP and CUP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: JoAnn Butler,Deb Nelson, Garret Scott,T.J. Winger b. In opposition:None c. Commenting. None d. Written testimony: JoAnn Butler,Applicant's Representative e. Staff presenting_application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Ke. ids)of public testimony a. The Applicant requests a couple of alternatives to the designn guidelines in the TMISAP pertaining to roof pitches and front stoops in the multi-family portion of the development. The plan calls for roof pitches ranging from 4:12 to 12:12;the Applicant requests the allowance of a lower pitch for the community clubhouse amenity buildings of 2:12 and for the townhome garages of 3:12 to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level. Front stoops are desired in the Plan for buildings that face public streets of 18"to 24"above grade; due to concerns pertainingto o compliance with ADA requirements,the Applicant proposes patios instead with railings that frames off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies. b. In favor of the roof pitches and front porches proposed in lieu of stoops for sense of place within the communitopinion that they meet the intent of the guidelines.—TJ Winger(part of the architecture team for this project). 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The Applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain structures; and for front stoops to not be required per the design guidelines in the Plan; b. Preference for more commercial to develop first rather than residential to create more .Jobs 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: Page 21 Page 107 Item#8. a. The Commission was supportive of the Applicant's request for lower roof pitches in the multi-family portion of the development(i.e. 2:12 on amenity buildings and 3:12 on townhome garages) and for the design guideline pertaining to front stoops to not be required. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. If Council agrees with the Applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain buildings and for covered front patios to be provided instead of stoops, it should be memorialized in the DA. VII. EXHIBITS A. Development Agreement(DA)Modification 1. Existing DA provisions(Planning Dept. only): 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.I. Developer/Owner shall develop the Property in accordance with conditions identified in Exhibit B of the staff report for the hearing date of December 8, 2009,which Exhibit B of the staff report is a portion of Exhibit B attached to this Agreement. EXHIBIT B: AGENCY&DEPARTMENT COMMENTS On September 24, 2009, Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Parks Department, and Sanitary Service Company. Staff has included all comments and recommended actions in the attached Exhibit B. 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.1 The legal description and exhibit map for the area contained in the proposed annexation submitted with the application (stamped on August 26, 2009, by Michael Marks, PLS) shows the property within the existing corporate boundary of the City of Meridian (see Exhibit Q. 1.2 A Development Agreement(DA)will be required as part of the annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The Applicant shall contact the City Attorney's Office within one year of Council approval to initiate this process. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the City Attorney's office prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. An encroachment permit is required for any improvements proposed within the pipeline easement. A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site. Uses such as daycares, schools,hospitals,assisted living facilities, etc. where occupants are not able to leave the area quickly in case of an emergency, are discouraged in the vicinity of the pipeline. b. Street buffer landscaping, internal parking lot landscaping, landscape buffers to adjoining residential uses, and mitigation for existing trees 4-inch caliper and larger Page 22 Page 108 Item#8. that are removed from the site,will be required with development of this site and shall be installed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. c. Development of this site shall be consistent with the concept site plan shown in Exhibit A.2 and the concept pictures shown in Exhibit A.3. Further,future development shall be consistent with the vision of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan, the Design Manual, and City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. d. Development in the R-40 district shall be consistent with the overall density and development standards contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan for Medium High Density Residential(MHDR)designated areas. e. Development in the C-C district shall be consistent with the development standards contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan for Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) designated areas. Uses within the C-C district shall be comprised of a mix of uses(i.e. office,retail,recreational, employment, and other uses, including residential uses) as defined in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. f. A 10-foot wide segment(s)of the City's multi-use regional pathway system shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the Master Pathways Plan in the general locations noted on the plan included in Exhibit A.4; exact location of the pathways shall be determined by the Planning Department and Parks Department at the time of development. Said pathway shall be primarily located within the pipeline easement and provide connectivity to the planned pathway in Baraya Subdivision at the northwest corner of the site.Pathway stubs shall be provided at the west boundary further to the south and to the east boundary on the north end of the site for connectivity with future segments of the pathway. g. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application to the Planning Department for approval of all future uses on the site to ensure compliance with the Unified Development Code, Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, Comprehensive Plan,Design Manual,and provisions of the development agreement contained herein,prior to issuance of building permits for any structure(s)within this site. Link to complete Development Agreement(Inst. #110115738): https://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=76898&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City Page 23 Page 109 Item#8. 2. Existing Approved Conceptual Development Plan&Elevations: PARCEL R-1 _ PARCEL PARCEL 0.9 .-. PA M8 AR u .,.. RCEL ... _w PARCEL M-1 e_ q W PARCLLO.1 -k""T,;,`--' .x"-`� PARCEL M-7 PARCEL2 O. PA L M-2&�M� __ ... ... ... m«i. PARCEL 0-3 _ — PARK RESTAURANTA P_A_RCEL O� .s P_A_RCEL M-4 a� PARK RESTAURANT6 r .j5 L— � +' PARK RESTAURANT C PARCEL O-5 _ .... Ya...... x - ..- ... PARCEL M-5 PARK RESTAURANT O YY PA_RCEL O£ - -- BOUTIQUE RETAIL ML - PARCEL 0-7 e _ K I IKE Ec CI 11 n5 - . I I 1 .1 I � _ A�" wm Page 24 Page 110 Dm#a & Proposed Conceptual Development Plan \- \/OL �� J !< � % \ . � � �� | ■ ■ � JA � 2 � ■ @-A � � %, ■ �� . f- ■ A ■•�e��@ � �.��@� � � �„4 �;�%u !% �•�s��-- � m% e■�■, ■.,$ - -® �.@•,■� �� .. �f �a■ 1.94 Page 75 �7v� 4. Proposed 1 1 Building 1s/Design K77We 77 - T Examples 1 Use Commercial/Retail1 Jur r � PRODUCT CONCEPT STUDY Examplesof Vertically Integrated Residential Design Page 26 Item#8. FFF. A Aw I` i M-E PRODUCT CONCEPT STUDY Examples of Mixed Employment Design r. i 000 . �• tI p� I � �. .zs RWIF L ;� � it�• j� - ."': Oil . i.= ot WE PRODUCT CONCEPT STUDY Examples of High Density Employment Design Page 27 Page 113 Item#8. B. Rezone—Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps - - (Faef1c, JE dL w � I _ g U 0 J Z N 7 ®Z�MG EYHIBIT y7 � Page 28 Page 114 Item#8. EaT-O ENGINEERS Project No: 1905aO {late.December 15,2021 Page 1 of 1 MERIDIAN 118 H-E ZONING A parcel of land located in portions of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4,and the NW114 of the SE114,of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Center East 1/16 Corner of said Section,from which the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section bears N.69°14'39"W., 1321.43 feet;thence along the east boundary of said NW1/4 of the SE114, A) S.00°33'33"W.,419.50 feet;thence, B) S.681120'35"W.,422.37 feet;thence, C) 5.06°13'49"W.,104.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence continuing, 1) 5.06013'49°W.,46.04 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 2) Southwesterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 125.D0 feet,an arc length of 96.48 feet,through a central angle of 44°13'28"and a long chard which bears 5.28120'33"W., 94A1 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 3) S.50°2717"W.,698.92 feet;thence, 4) N.39°32'45"W., 589.58 feet;thence, 5) N.66°0605"E.,97.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 6) Northeasterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 1000.D0 feet,an arc length of 430.30 feet,through a central angle of 24139'16"and a long chord which bears N.78'25'43"E.,426.99 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 7) 5.89°14'39"E„456.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING:7.06 acres,more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. P� 13765 OF 1�F 332 N.Broadmore Way Nampa.ID8369�I P:208.442.6300.to•engineers_tom MJR�,� Page 29 Page 115 Item#8. ©20 T-O ENG1yEERS.THIS INSTRUMENT LS THE PROPERLY OF T-0 ENGINEERS.ANY REPRODUCTION,REUSE OR%WIFICATION OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF T-0 ENGINEERS IS STRICTLY PROHISITE I EXHIBIT SKETCH- H-E ZONING LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NEI 4 OF THE SW714 AND THE NW114 OF THESE 1/4 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2Q2t LINE TABLE CW1116 N89'14'51"W C114 BASIS OF BBARINGS .�_ N89'14'39"W 1321.43' CE1116 LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1322-76' _ -- 0 L1 SO6'13'49"W 104.18' m a L2 S06'13'49"W 4-6.04' 3 (C-Q L3 N66'06'05"E 97.09' n I� I rry Id a LEGEND POINT OF S88'20'35"W 422.37' BEGINNING _ -- NEW ZONE BOUNDARY \ C2 _ o- S89'14'39"E ' r 458.97' -- - EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY V3 V I a RECORD ANGLE POINT ,`SECTION LINE 51215427850 y� H-E (GC] EYISITING ZONING \ 7.06 Ac. /oyL S1215427850 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. (N E) //////!;d16 (� A\ l NOTESy�o�� 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.110115738, +Vzr+tsTnTl OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. -- - 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM U ISO, 30V 600' C-C TO H-E. �ti. LA p SCALE:1"W 300' �S CURVE TABLE �- o CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING CHORD 4 13765 A anT-O E N G 1 N E E R S s r y�lGr z( Cl 125A0' 96.48' 44 33'28" 528'20'33'W 94.11' Z 332 N.BR4ADMS7RE WAY C2 1000,00' 430.30' 24'39'16" N78'25'43"E 426.99' F OF o�A NAMPA,IDAHO$36$7 BO'mA PHONE:(206)442-6300 WWW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM E-FILE:19050 M ZONING H-E DATE.1211P2021 JOB:IMSM Page 30 Page 116 Item#8. T 0 ENG11111EERS Project No: 1905W {date: December 15,2021 Page 1 of 2 MERIDIAN 110 M-E ZONING A parcel of land located in portions of the NE114 of the SW1/4 and the NW114 of the SE1/4,of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West.Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center East 1116 Corner of said Section bears S.89°14'39"E.,a distance of 1321.43 feet;thence,along the north line of said NE114 of the SWIM, A) N.89014'51°W.,291.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.;thence, 1) 5.39"31'08"E.,747.95 feet to the beginning of non-tangent curve;thence, 2) Southwesterly along said curve to the left,having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 185.66 feet,through a central angle of 10°38'16"and a long chord which bears S.71°25'13"W., 185.40 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 3) 5.66°06 05"W.,231.67 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 4) Southwesterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 750.DQ feet,an arc length of 322.73 feet,through a central angle of 24°39'16"and a long chord which bears 5.78°2543°IN, 320.24 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 5) N.89"14'39"W.,51.86 feet;thence, 6) S-00°45'21"W.,393.63 feet to the north right-of-way of interstate Highway 84; thence along said right-of-way, 7) N.81-24'57"IN.,352.28 feet;thence, 9) N.85023'09"W.,21.65 feet,thence depaf Ling said north right-of-way, 9) N.09"28'05"E.,86.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,thence, 10)Northeasterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 150_00 feet,an arc length of 107.30 feet,through a central angle of 40059'02"and a long chord which bears N.29157'36"E., 105.02 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 1 332 N.Broadmore Way'Nampa-I0 83687 R 208442 6300 to-engineefs.ram Page 31 Page 117 Item#8. an T-O ENGINEERS Project No:190580 Date: December 15,2021 Page 2 of 2 11)N.50°27'07"E.. 357.09 feet;thence, 12)N.3903245"W.,918.69 feet to beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 13)Northwesterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 150.00 feet,an arc length of 39.04 feet,through a central angle of 14°54'48"and a long chord which bears N.32°05'21°W., 38.93 feet to the north boundary of said NE114 of the SW114,from which point the Center West 1/16 Corner of said Section bears N.891114'51"W.,a distance of 115A6 feet;thence, 141 5.89°1451"E.,915.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING.17,38 acres,more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County,Idaho. N rr- a 1376,5 �r D F 0 �0'MA�ti 2 332 N_Broadmam Way Nampa,M 81687 R 208.442.63CKQ to eng�rwersxom Page 32 Page 118 Item#8. ©Z021 T-O ENGINEERS.THIS INSTRUMENT IS TI-E PROPERTY OF T-O ENGINEERS.AKY REPRODUCTION,REUSE OR VOOIFICAPON OF Tn151NSTROMENT OR ITS CONTENTS'MTHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF T-O ENGINEERS IS STRICTLY PRCHIBITEI EXHIBIT SKETCH-WE ZONING LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NEL4 OF THE SW V4 AND THE NW11L OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 15.TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 CW1116 L5 _ 589'14'51"E 915.97' N89'14'51"W C1I4 BASIS OF BEARINGS -�--- - - __ S89'14'39"E 1321.43' CE1116 POINT OF_/,"V 291.63' --- --- ----�fl BEGINNING S \` (C-C) Q' 150' 300' 600' S1215427850 M-B \ SCALE:1—300' 17.38 AG. {C-C) LEGEND t A E� `� (H-E) —" NEW ZONE BOUNDARY EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY r / 13765 ���:a '� --- SECTION LINE �yOQ a RECORD ANGLE POINT lF OF I {N!-E) EXISITING ZONING 0'MAI��` Mlo (HE) 51215427850 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. P o 1 I u) L - 5`_- NOTES N8r�457»W 1�1r.Ei5itiLN4 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LINE TABJ86' CURVE TABLE RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT Na.110115738, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, LINE BEARING CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING CHORD 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL 5L REZONED FROM L3 S66'06'05"W C1 1000.00' 185.66' 10'38'16" S71'25'13"W 185.40' C-C AND H-E TO M-E. L2 N89'14'39"W C2 750.00' 322.73' 2439'16" S78'25'43"W 320.24' L3 N85'23'09"W C3 150.00' 107.30' 40'59'02" N29'57'36"E 105.02' T-© ENG1NEERS L4 N0928'05"E C4 150.00' 39.04' 14'54'48" N32'05'21"W 38.93' 332 N.BROADMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 L5 N89-14'51"W PHONE:11209)442.6300 WWW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM E-FILE.19M-VAE,ZONING -E DATE.1?J 5i2021 J067 1905N Page 33 Page 119 Item#8. T-D EIVCy11VEER5 Project No: 190580 Date: December 15,2021 Page 1 of 1 MERIDIAN 118 R-15 ZONING A parcel of land being all of the SE114 of the NW1/4,of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center Fast 1116 corner of said Section bears S.89°14'39"E.,a distance of 1321.43 feet;thence along the south boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW114, 1) N.89°14'51"W. 1322.76 feet to the Center West 1/16 Corner of said Section;thence along the west boundary of said 5E114 of the NW114, 2) N.00°39'49"E. 1328.76 feet to Northwest 1116 Corner of said Section,thence along the north boundary of said SE114 of the NW114, 3) S.89015'14"E. 1321.52 feet to the Center North 1116 Corner of said Section,thence along the east boundary of said SE114 of the NW1/4, 4) S.OT36'37"W.1328,91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING:40.33 acres„more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No.110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. a 1765 �..r1�lr�lxa 4 q}�OF�Dt� 1 33?N,Binammore Way Nampa.0$3687 P;208.442.6300 i ta-engirwe",enm Page 34 Page 120 Item#8. ©2021 T-OENGINEERS.TH€S INSTRUMENTIS THE PROPERTY OF 7.0 ENGINEERS,ANY REPRODUC11014,REUSE OR NIGOFICAIION OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC}VRITTEN PERMISSION OF 7-0 ENGINEERS IS STRICTI-Y PRONEITE! EXHIBIT SKETCH-R-15 ZONING ALL OF THE SE114 OF THE NW114 OF SECTION 15.TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 NW1116 S89'15'14"E 1321.52' CNN16 LEGEND NEW ZONE BOUNDARY r 1 1 - - EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY ISECTION LINE 1 1 o RECORD ANGLE POINT I 1 (R-40) I (M-E) CALCULATED POINT 1 S1215244200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. i02 i � 1 c6 yS12152442 +N I,1 NOTES 1. ALL. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE In BAS£D ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS Z {M-E) INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.110115738, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM R-40, M-E, AND C-C TO R-15. J I f CW11 6 — �N89'14'5T"W 1322.76--- --G114 S89'14'39"E 1321.43' CE1116 A p}kl�L A N . � N'S 9 fi AL 13765 p 0 T-O ENGINEERS 0' 150' 300' 600' !/! 332 N.BROADMORE WAY SCALE:1"=3OC' 'lF OF NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 o'mA� PHONE:�208)442-6300 WWW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM FILE:1MW-V-X8I DATE.lV02021 JOB,1WMO Page 35 Page 121 Item#8. T-O EhAGINEERS Project No:190580 Date: December 16,2021 Page 1 of 1 MERIDIAN 118 C-C ZONING A parcel of land located in a portion of the NWI/4 of the SE114 of Section 15.Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at The Center East 1116 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center 114 Corner of said Section bears N.89°14'39"K, 1321A3 feet;thence,along the east boundary of said NWI/4 of the 5EIM4 A) S.00`33'33W,419.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence continuing along said east boundary, 1) S,OY33'33"W., 121.49 feet;thence leaving said east boundary, 2) N.89°14'39"W.,432.35 feet;thence, 3) N.06°13`49"E.,104.18 feet;thence, 4) N.88°20'35"E.,422.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING; 1.10 acres,more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. _ f 13f765 � NJ ��IrfG,��r4 4r OF AS O'MAt-�- 1 382 dd.5roadmore Way Nampa.1D B3687.P•20$_442.63W;tQ engineers.corn Page 36 Page 122 Item#8. ©2021 7-0 ENGINEERS.THIS INSTRUMENT IS TFE PROPERTY OF T-0ENGINEER6,ANY REPRODUCTION,REUSE ORMODIFICATiON OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERM{SSION OF T-0 ENGINEERS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEI EXHIBIT SKETCH-C-C ZONING LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NW114 OF THE SE114OF SECTION 15.TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2a21 Cw1l16 y N89'14'51"W 1322.78'J� C114 _ BASIS OF BEARINGS --- L-- --- _--_ o --- N BASIS 4'39"W 1321.4 CE3116 p ul LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE rC-C} I M L1 SOO'33'33"W 121.49' L2 N06'13'49"E 1G4.1 a' 0' [50• 30a• 6G0• POINT OF E t'=3O0' BEGINNING scn _N88-20'35"E 422.37'Y S1215427850 LEGEND J 10c J (C-C) 1 iO AG. -- NEW ZONE BOUNDARY N89-14'39-W 432.35' EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY --- SECTION LINE I � RECORD ANGLE POINT I (H-E} EEXISITING ZONING S1215427B50 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. NOTES p EN 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS o INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 13765 �MOT-0 ENGINEERS RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.11 011 57 38, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, tDAHO. Z// No! 332 N.BROADMORE WAY fpF 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM 0 Of �y NAMPA.IDAHO 83687 H-E TO C-C. PHONE:(208)442-63DO W WW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM ETILE,19)580-V-80 ZONIi DATE:IV1=1 JOB-IMD Page 37 Page 123 Item#8. C. Preliminary Plat 1. Preliminary Plat&Phasing Plan(REVISED) (date: 11/17/2021) I I VANGUARD VILLAGE OUDIVISIOH .� IF 00 g( i Q e j EIIIHIV " '9 .a-9 Fes+ {-wr.. tt F 1b 14 � O I Mwl � �Fi I�Pot&�-4� 4-A'-wht10rav ••• P Q U - r �ro nwc c fyll - e mac. E 7 co 0 ID I � ,♦ I I Eli I ® II E I I A -- Page 38 Page 124 Item#8. A ` I ivr Lo !9 w q C1�2 ® O 56 sss sxErrarz — 3z'6" iro - a — 1 1 :E 1 m 4 u ;n. a - LLW F M- u P I, LU zo f § 1 g Ed § Ed 0 O C1.3 Page 39 Page 125 Item#8. ® O �56 n U i 7 �` -- _ -- — — —————— O n � g ----------------- is p641 -i �I a ®` -- = f w vO-- ' J NO ❑ W I Q � � Z 0 --------s 9I� K Z r Ir � h YiI -..._-_ irvrexsrnrEee 4i__�__�_rv®w•eis+a --�--�-4�� seoa�-_a __ 0 C1.4 p �ss z 0 z i rc e u � a g€g ge 2 33 J og � J h d > w ¢ < 5 g � W W Z 2 Z fn SUNSETT�.anO C2.3 Page 40 Page 126 Item#8. �I IS �esi s 4 v LLW � z = C2A Updated: v�'ICAL CRO55 SECTIDN�, Page 41 Page 127 Item#8. �� •- �'- PM.SE8.11�LONEB � . .I El LU I J < Z a F -- ---.- S C7.1 Page 42 Page 128 Item#8. 2. Landscape Plan (date: 2/13/2022) `[' � I e- �1 i'��• m p� VF�.GUARD WAY a^w 9 77 f m.v....,..,.... d _ :, $ e ,..«..�.,..,».n��.M...,,fl,....,...,,�.� 0 -X- 1 SHEET INDEX O a eox�arvn,ox,v.�e,uuaaoouer unrvuer _,.... �,.., L1.00 uNoscwEr.,�wuncNs uNosc.wE cucuuncNs '� v tea, E' N 3 dE � t Ej s .�' - Z z > o -�� 6 z V Ej . /�1�.,mcwEcxann�s roo«a�xE E,o�r s �zoD Page 43 Page 129 Item#8. i GROUND MATERIAL SCHEDULE �eq - L6.13 L6.14 � u P , J jhI SYMBOL SCHEDULE \ V Q F � 66.075 z Nil L6.06 ' L6.03 _ [ _ g w z fD L6 02 L6.07 �C4NHIFH wpl, ¢ Z Of w �OHH lhoa L ll1�0 > o 0 f _ L6.00 Link to complete plan set: https:llweblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=252515&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit E Page 44 Page 130 Item#8. 3. Circulation Plan--Revised g a. o 3 E ! s a 7 ff — i.a pINNNN',L1NNf'1 W S _ z a - �INHNPp�� _ w 5 NNbNNHN� � W" O ONNN��4INNINN 4HNNINRdg1VNhNA1HPlo �d zHMMV F tlNHNN�INNNb:' r � a IAA--JiL1L5.NP SRE 4 34J_4-3N PSI! G 4 L5.0 Page 45 Page 131 Item#8. D. Conditional Use Permit 1. Site Plan (dated: 10/6/21) p 9 I _ W Q • P� mvmsn awrsmeoau� u �` Li ' Y y, 3 PNJ(NG}FREE-NMTI Of 1'PNCJJIFD WAY w ❑ \ mrxxo�w.mieovx,.wwmxuo umm�u J Q � W - cn i ICI ^ C2.0 Page 46 Page 132 Ng. ==Z M,,��� _ —�--� �� �� _« rax.,a.e,r a.om,c.:nru.us % CUP FOR LDK PROJECT VANGUARD AT I OAAILEAAERIDIAN IDAHO 53642 VANrIJAM ME PLM4 Page47 Item#8. 2. Phasing Plan-REVISED El El a 66 F<-i s E M-F � LU 12 � < Z 2 D z i CIA Page 48 Page 134 Item#8. 3. Parking Calculations - Revised Att. noir Parking non- ffi— Eta Total unit, Gwak;e—" 16ed Parking 1.5�-it t—d covered 2.3 bed 2lunit to'rered —ed —red covered Garden sr.'le 24 0 12 1E 6 12 12 24 12 12 IS 24 Building 3 a 8 2 3 1 2 4 6 4 4 5 8 Building 1 E 9 4 6 2 4 4 8 a 4 6 8 Building 5 8 12 2 3 1 2 6 12 6 6 7 8 Building 6 a 8 0 0 0 0 A 8 4 4 4 a Building 7 a 4 2 3 1 2 2 a 2 2 3 a Required) Provkded Provided Provided R.*irod N— Required Pegdred Required P-dded n Provided Provided Pr1a'lided PHas=1 Buildingtype No.d61�s Total Unit wed Covered Gwst A�AStalls Bike Parking catered attadred dtnached carports Cmered P➢A stalls Bike Pafki Ga 'es ra Parki' Garden 6 144 109 144 0 3 11 66 55 66 .... a 5 40 30 40 40 5 13 IC4 m 104 __- 6 3 LI 12 12 2� 3fifi 3G0 30 156 TOTAL PHASE 1 1 296 366 37 14 1 36 1 264 474 14 40 Required) Provided Prardd d Provided Regr�ed NOrF Required Pegrired Required Provided no Provided Provided Pr-.Id euildingtype No.oFddgs total unit �d CPotsEd Guest AOA9talls Bike Parking covered attadred detxhed carports Ca.�efed ALA s[aIIR Bike Park) Ga �e5 ra Park)' Garden 3 72 54 72 0 3 7 42 35 42 56 1 6 48 36 a6 48 6 6 8 8 16 7 4 16 12 16 16 186 136 20 39 TOTAL PHASE 3 91 114 19 7 9 125 195 8 Page 49 Page 135 Item#8. 4. Landscape Plan (dated: November 2021) SECTION 05 TREE SPECIES MIX TREES LINEAL FEET OFSTREET FRONTAGEEQ 5,496 SorosEoi TREE MITIGATION ALL EXISTING TREES REMOVED TO RE MITIGATED AT 1:1 RATIO NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE FOR REQUIRING MITIGATION PROPOSED TREE SPECIES MIX CONIFERIu9 TA— CLASS I-557 Treea II AMELIN HIERXGRAND=%QRA AUTUMNBRILLIANCE 75e CLASS II-162 Tree. I. CLASS Illu 157 Trees GRODONDRONTUUN ERA40% PROPOSED TREE KEY Q CONIFER CLA5511 •CLASSIII O p®p VANGUARD VILLAGE.I Meridian,ID I Condidoeal Use Permit I July 2021 GGLO l3 SECTION 05 1 TREE SPECIES MIX&ADDITIONAL DETAILS CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III COWERS `11�..✓ c 1% Amelinchierxgrand itbra"AYtUmn Brlllianca' Setula nigra'Heritage Gymnoclad.Sdioic PinucfleAHR Sr i-th.11y ✓Yves Birch Kentucky Coffee Tree U.N.,Pine Height:15-25' Height:35-50' Helghr.50-60 Height:40-W Spread:15-25' Spread:30-40' Spread:35-45' Spread:25-40' Water:Medium Water:Medium Water:MINI— Water.Medium MaiMenana:Low Maintenance:Law Maintenance:tow Maintenance:Low lik Ace IRDUm Lidodendranlulipifcra Red Maple T.IIp Tree Height:35-45' Height:50-80' Spread:25-35' Spread:35.45' Water:Medium Water:Medium Maintenance:Low Maintenance:Law VANGUARD YIUAGE.I Meridian,01 Corditiwul Use Permd I July M21 GGLO I Page 50 Page 136 Item#8. SECTION 07 PLANTING ZONES aas�oEnt.r oRAssr ueeANDs uxsnlNE saeua... FORESTED MOUNTAIN ■ ALRALIN€SNRURLANOS ' ■ GRASSY UPLANDS P , TREASURE VALLEY NOTE Build ag elevations shown on Nese sections are for ®® reference only and are not in—le.Please see architecture section for proposed building plans,elevations and sections. I I I SECTION X 'GAS FAS ENT 44 Lja p I I I I l I I I I I I SECTIONX i I I � I I I I I . GAS Ers€M€Nr I I I I I x RESIDE—A, AL—M.RNRVRAN. FORESTED MOU NTAIN ®r r�;S s[{ u W I I I SECLON X I I I I G0.5 EASEMENT ' VANGUARD VILLAGE.I Meridian,ID Conditional Use Permit JDIy2021 GGLO L-ID Page 51 Page 137 Item#8. 5. Qualified Open Space- Revised SECTJON 03 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM ----------------------------------------------- i'HkSE S 1 L-J --�--I PHA5 E 3 r I I I OUALIFIED OPEN SPACE I � I Y 00ALIFIED OPEN SPACECALCIILATION MIN.AREA=400 SF,MIN.DIMENSION=20FT.{PER UDC 11-4-3-27CI TOTALSREAREA=1,725.9735F UNITS BETWEEN SWSF 612.00 SF: ' 27O UNITS 0[250 5F REG-OPEN SPACE)=67,500 SF I U NITS GREATER THAN i 2005F: w 1 O4 UNITS M 3505E REG-OPEN SPACE}=38,6065E TOTAL REG.OPEN SPATE=1 D1,1005F iOTAI OPEN SPACE PROVIDED=2T5,9785F PHASE a UNITS BETWEEN 600 SF 31700 SF: 152 UNITS R 2503F REG-OPEN SPACE}=39,0063E UNITS GREATER THAN i2O0 SF: �R _ Ed UNI751%3505E AE-0,OPEN SPAtEy=77,9005E - * i j Y x I TOTAL REO.OPENSPACE=i9, 5E � I TOTAL OPEN SPACE PPA]YI MD==11 115,]125F Y141.eLLT� FOR NCYATE OPEN SPACE—MI-ATION SEE ARCHI IECTURAI PROJECT DATA Add'a. Ahn&-ID Cendi-WU-P—wl, 1i-II-M21 GGLO L-3 Page 52 Page 138 Item#8. 6. Site Amenities SECTION 02 ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE AMENITIES 1.COMMON CENTRAL AMENITY AREA WITH NATIVE GRASSES, MULTIPURPOSE TRAILS,SOCIAL GATHERING NODES AND SEATING )'LOCATED ATOP GAS EASEMENT.NO TREES OR FOUNDATIONS PERMITTED) 2.CLUB HOUSE AMENITY-SWIMMING POOL,HOT TUB,CABANAS AND wo PRIVACY FENCES 3.OUTDOOR KITCHEN&DINING 4.FITNESS LOUNGE 5.LAWN GAMES&FIREPIT LOUNGE B.PICKLE BALL COURT ].CHILDREN PLAY AREA B.DOG PARKS 9.RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AREAS WITH SWIMMING POOL,PICNIC SHELTER AND FIRE PIT LOUNGE 10,ART&STORM WATER FACILITIES it 11.PUMP BUILDING 12,RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AREA WITH PLAY AREA AND HBO LOUNGE nw 13,6D'-0-SETBACK(25 STREET SCAPE PLANTING+35-IRRIGATION EASEMENT) 14,5.-0"MIN PARKING LOU PERIMETER LANDSCAPE STRIP ill -o i� 15,BUFFER PLANTINGAT DIFFERENT LAND USES 16.COVERED PARKING 11,ADA PARKING 18,213'STREET BUFFER 19,5-RESIDENTIAL BUFFER 20.TRASH LOCATIONS FTYP.SEE IF&ARCHITECTURE SHEETS FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS) . � 21.SITE TRIANGLE FLIP)BICYCLE PARKING(SEE PARKING CALCULATION ON CIVIL 5HEET5) "FORMS,PARKING AND AT O0®0' SIFE. ION ARF0.5,Y.—,STREET FURNITUREOAOTHERMAN-MADEELEMENTS.N VANGUARD VILLAGE.I Muld!—ID I C—dili...IUse Permit N—b,,2021 GGLO L2 Page 53 Page 139 Item#8. 7. Building Elevations(dated: March 9,2022)REVISED (NOT APPROVED) Link to complete plan set, including floor plans: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orb/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=248842&dbid=0&redo=Meridia nCi MATERIAL LEGEND ■ m m aw E9 oix.cx.r m m ■ usnrw«rs E'�i' 1B m ID m m m m a 2t= GC�H�EMAI �G�ARDDEN'BUILDING MATERIAL LEGEND ■ WESTERry RED —0 CEDRR —G— IE — ■ F-1 1; sR N�EEs AP E�m E APARTMENTS II 0 z�no,o TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS Page 54 Page 140 Item#8. MATERIAL LEGEND nwore A� M ■ ■ YACSrCRk R[➢ SrI1C[G �uncrrs asr wkrre ar w�av�iMEx�isLe Z�sesa TOWN HOUSE BUILDING 4 ELEVATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND T ® ■ FO STUCCO I'nuu� .Alt envm sn.usxim,�s ■ uan nm.,n_� SHINGLESW NST'LE APARTMENTS A..e 3j ado TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 5 ELEVATIONS Page 55 Page 141 Item#8. MATERIAL LEGEND 0 ❑ u NTGaav GREEN <� wcsrEary aco sru¢o _ -�� ceoAa oanR Gawv APAR ry TE AaARTNENTE m-v y .wuu wiw � :..mud ML TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 6 ELEVATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND IG-11v GREEN - - ■RED —o ceonR oaaN Saar 1IM- F-1 �m GN.NG� R HITE TT aPANT l e Li e 11 ® p [Ell El TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 7 ELEVATIONS Page 56 Page 142 Item#8. CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS. -- -- - Q VERTICAL HARDIE PLANK SIDING-WOOD a A VERTICAL HARDIE PLANK SIDING-BEIGE Q STONE VENEER BACK ELEVATION 0 PAINTED METAL TRIM HORIZONTAL SLAT SHADE Q CEDAR POSTS&BEAMS Q STANDING SEAM ROOFING SIDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION 2 PTE—o, A801 CLUBHOUSE. FMffrSM I 1 �SEPTEMBER 2021 Avv` Page 57 Page 143 - _ - ' IN oil Page 58 Item#8. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Development Agreement Modification: 1.1 The existing Development Agreement(DA) shall be terminated and a new amended and re- stated DA is required as a provision of the proposed modification which shall at a minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the site plan, qualified open space exhibit, site amenity exhibit,pedestrian circulation plan,preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations submitted with the applications contained herein. b. All future development, site design and building design shall comply with the guidelines in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan and the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual, as applicable. c. An encroachment permit is required for any improvements proposed within the Williams pipeline easement. A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site.Uses such as daycares, schools,hospitals,assisted living facilities, etc.where occupants are not able to leave the area quickly in case of an emergency, are discouraged in the vicinity of the pipeline. All development within the Williams pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. d. The street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way shall be constructed in accord with Street Section D(residential collector street)in the TMISAP,which requires 11-foot travel lanes, 6-foot bike lanes, 8-foot parallel parking, 8-foot parkways and minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks (see pg. 3-21 and 3-23). e. The street sections for Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills shall be constructed in accord with Street Section C(major collector street)in the TMISAP with a modification that allows (3) 11-foot travel lanes, on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot parkways and detached 10-foot wide sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes as required by ACHD. Streetlights are required at a pedestrian scale (see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23). f. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways shall include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color,markings, materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). g. Development in the R-15 district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) for Medium High Density Residential(MHDR)designated areas. h. Development in the C-C district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) for Mixed Use Commercial(MU-COM)designated areas. i. Development in the M-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP)for Mixed Employment(ME) designated areas. Page 59 Page 145 Item#8. j. Development in the H-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) for High-Density Employment(HDE)designated areas. k. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-47). 1. Design elements shall be provided within the overall development as required in the Application of the Design Elements matrix on pg. 3-49 of the TMISAP. in. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applicationo and/or building permit application. The Applicant may submit a design review applications) to finalize building design prior to recordation of the final plat(s). n. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application to the Planning Division for approval of all future uses on the site to ensure compliance with the Unified Development Code,Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, Comprehensive Plan,Architectural Standards Manual, and provisions of the development agreement contained herein,prior to issuance of building permits for any structure(s)within this site. 2. Preliminary Plat: 2.1 Future development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and the C-C,M-E and H-E zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-3, as applicable. A minimum building setback of 10-feet is required in the multi-family portion of the development unless a greater setback is otherwise required, per UDC 11-4-3-27B.1. The 20-foot wide collector street buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. Separation between buildings shall comply with Building code. 2.2 The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Depict the easements for the Marvin Lateral and/or the Purdam Drain on the plat if they encroach on this site. b. Include a note prohibiting direct access via the collector streets other than the access points approved by the City and ACHD with this application. c. Depict street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way consistent with Street Section D in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-21). d. Depict street sections for Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills consistent with Street Section C in the TMISAP with a modification that allows(3) 11-foot travel lanes, on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot parkways and detached 10-foot wide sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes as required by ACHD. Streetlights are required at a pedestrian scale(see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3- 23). e. Depict required street landscape buffers in common lots or on permanent dedicated buffer easements,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association or business owners' association, as applicable, as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.2.A reduction of the collector street setback may be granted for homes that front on a collector street when certain conditions exist as noted in UDC Table 11-2A-7, note#L Page 60 Page 146 Item#8. 2.3 The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall be revised as follows: a. Depict one(1)additional tree within the street buffer along Umbria Hills(east)per the minimum standard listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3b. b. Widen the street buffer along Umbria Hills to 20-feet as required for a collector street in UDC Table 11-2B-3. c. Depict landscaping within required street buffers in accord with the recently amended standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. d. Landscaping is required within parkways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B-7C. Class II trees shall be provided in parkways in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E; Class III trees may be considered if the parkways are widened to 10 feet. e. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways should include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color, markings,materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). f. Depict minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks along all streets in accord with the street sections(i.e. C and D) in the TMISAP. g. Depict a berm in the street buffer along I-84 in accord with the TMISAP for street buffers along transportation corridors (3.07.01 Q. h. Mitigation trees shall be depicted on the plan(185 trees at 2.5 caliper inches each for a total of 462.5 caliper inches). i. If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement for pathways and open space. 2.4 All streets shall be constructed as complete streets as defined in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-19 & 3-20). 2.5 All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. 2.6 A 14-foot wide public use easement for the multi-use pathways within this site shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s). 2.7 A private street application shall be submitted with the final plat application for the multi- family development as required by the Fire Dept. All private streets shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. 3. Conditional Use Permit: 3.1 Comply with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for multi-family developments,including but not limited to the following: (revise the site plan and/or landscape plan accordingly) a. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas,waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street, or shall be fully screened from view from a public street as set forth in UDC 11-4-3- 27B.2. Page 61 Page 147 Item#8. b. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-2 7B.3. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks, and/or enclosed yards. Floor plans shall be submitted for all units that demonstrate compliance with this standard. c. Depict the location of the property management office,maintenance storage area, and central mailbox location(including provisions for parcel mail)on the site plan that provides safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access and the location of the directory&map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27B.7. d. Depict a berm or a constructed barrier at least 4 feet in height with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access within the street buffer along the north side of Vanguard Way in accord with UDC 11-4-3-27C. e. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation that meets the minimum standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E.2. f. All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27F. A recorded copy of said documents shall be submitted prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the development.\ 3.2 Include a detail for the bicycle parking facilities that complies with the standards in UDC 11- 3C-SC. Bicycle racks should be depicted in central locations for each building and for the clubhouse. 3.3 Depict landscaping along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip along each side of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover; a minimum of one (1)tree per 100 linear feet of pathway is required. 3.4 Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C. 3.5 A minimum of one(1)tree shall be provided for every 8,000 square feet of common open space. 3.6 The space between building fagades and adjacent sidewalks should be landscaped with a combination of lawns, groundcover, shrubs and trees as set forth in the TMISAP. 3.7 A!andseaped buffer-should be provided between the proposed development and the existing single family develepmen4 to the nei4h as set fefth in the T-N4!S,A 3.8 Include a 10-foot wide pathway connection between the pathway along the Purdam Drain and the pathway within the pipeline easement. 3.9 If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement for pathways and open space. 3.10 All structures shall comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM)and the design guidelines in the TMISAP for the MHDR designation(see the matrix for Application of the Design Elements on pg. 3-49). 3.11 A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for approval of the site and building design prior to submittal of building permit applications. Page 62 Page 148 Item#8. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1. Applioant shall be required to re rottt the eiiisting water and sewer mains into the propo roadway&4ensions of E. Oakerest Dr. and N. Di*ie Ave. 1.2. The geotechnical investigative report prepared by GeoTek,Inc indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations. 1.3. All mains outside of right-of-way require a 20-foot-wide easement at minimum. For sewer mains of depths 15 feet—30 feet require a 30-foot-wide easement. 1.4. No permanent structures shall be within the footprint of a City utility easement including but not limited to buildings,carports, fences,infiltration trenches,trees, shrubs, light poles, etc. Based off the currently landscape plan, some trees will be in conflict with easements. 1.5. The angle of sewer main into and out of manholes must be a 90-degree minimum. Where the proposed sewer main connects to the existing 36-inch sewer main,this requirement is not met. 1.6. All water main north of Vanguard way should be 8-inch diameter. 1.7. A water main extension is required to the northwest corner of the development for future connection to the west. 1.8. Water main in West Navigator should be 12-inch diameter from the east boundary to the west boundary. 1.9. A 12-inch diameter water main shall be extended to the west property boundary on the south side for future connection. 1.10. It is unclear by the provided plans how buildings will be served and how fire protection will be provided. An additional water loop around the buildings might be required to provide fire flow. A complete water plan will be required to be submitted and reviewed by Public Works Engineering before any final plat is approved. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of Page 63 Page 149 Item#8. the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat for the phase which is beingdped. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC I I-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Page 64 Page 150 Item#8. 2.16 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.17 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.18 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.19 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.20 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancioy.oMIgublic works.aspx?id=272. 2.21 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature on the phase which is beingdped. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887- 2211. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=252151&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty B. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=251147&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity - The Police Dept. requests further discussions with the Developer on plans for emergency police access into each building entry point using a multi-technology keypad. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) hgps://weblink.m eridia n e i ty.org/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=249959&dbid=0&rep o=Meridia n C ity Page 65 Page 151 Item#8. D. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) hggs://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=250049&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty E. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridianciiy.oty. WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=252295&dbid=0&rMo=MeridianC hty https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=252296&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) hges://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=252341&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty G. PARK'S DEPARTMENT(REVISED) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=256235&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianci. .org,/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=256216&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCi ty I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—SCHOOL IMPACT TABLE hg2s://web link.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=258731&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed zoning map amendment and subsequent development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment will allow for the development of a mix of residential, commercial/retail, light industrial and employment uses which will provide for the retail and service needs of the community consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. Page 66 Page 152 Item#8. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Preliminary Plat Findings(11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use and transportation. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Commission finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section VIII for more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The Commission is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural,scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Conditional Use Permit Findings(UDC 11-513-6E) The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit requests upon the following: Page 67 Page 153 Item#8. 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The Commission finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and dimensional and development regulations of the R-15 district (see Analysis, Section V for more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The Commission finds that the proposed use as a multi family development is generally consistent with the future land use map designations for this property and is allowed as a conditional use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 in the R-15 zoning district. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The Commission finds the proposed design of the development, construction, operation and maintenance should be compatible with the mix of other uses planned for this area and with the intended character of the area and that such uses will not adversely change the character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The Commission finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. The Council should weigh any public testimony provided to determine if the development will adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The Commission finds that essential public services are available to this property and that the use will be adequately served by these facilities. Page 68 Page 154 E IDIAN.;--- Applicant's Presentation Page 4 PROJECT VANGUARD 2007 AERIAL / TEN MILE INTERCHANGE SPECIFIC AREA PLAN MAP Current ZoningSpecific Area Plan Ten Mile Interchange PROJECT VANGUARD 2020 AERIAL / PROPOSED LAND USE Community Business DistrictPhase 5: •High Density EmploymentPhase 4: •15-of RPhase 3: Reminder •Mixed EmploymentPhase 2: •15-Vanguard Way and a portion of the RPhase 1: •A preliminary plat consisting of 5 phases.•Preliminary Plat:compliance for site design.residential use on the Site, and a request for alternative family -onditional use permit application for multiC•Use Permit:yellow area) North of VanguardDensity Residential, 40.33 acres, -15 (Medium High-R•south of Vanguard C (Community Business District, 17.27 acres, red area) -C•South of VanguardE (High Density Employment, 28.60 acres, purple area) -H•of VanguardE (Mixed Employment, 29.07 acres, green area) South -M•Rezoning: PROJECT VANGUARD SITE PLAN / PHASING PROJECT VANGUARD PROJECT VANGUARD Landscape STREET SECTIONS PROJECT VANGUARD Rezoning Building heights will range from 1 to 4 stories•Minimal parking in the front of the buildings (<30%)•Small setbacks•Detached buildings•DESIGN ELEMENTS:TMISAP area.Retail and service uses for employment area in the •ight industrialL•lex officeF•USES:Village borrows design elements from the TMISAP. The proposed Mixed Employment area in Vanguard Zone E -M–Mixed Employment PROJECT VANGUARD E Mixed Employment, 29.07 acres-M– Rezoning Building heights will range from 1 to 6 stories•o parking in front of buildingsN•mall setbacksS•Detached buildings•DESIGN ELEMENTS:Limited retail. •Research and development•Business and professional office space•Corporate campus•USES:TMISAP.Density Employment guidance of the -the HighService uses (approximately 380,000 SF) supporting E Zone-H–High Density Employment PROJECT VANGUARD E High Density Employment, 28.60 acres-H– PROJECT VANGUARD ResidentialUse Commercial/Retail and High Density -C Mixed-C–Rezoning used for residences.No more than 30% of ground level development to be •12 units / acre. -8•perceived street crossing distances. “hold the corners” at street intersections to limit •Attached buildings,•contain no parking at their front, •Buildings will be between 1 and 4 stories high•DESIGN:Standar d commercial and retail uses•USES:Design elements from the TMISAP. C Zone-C–Mixed Use Commercial/Retail PROJECT VANGUARD detailing must all face public spaces or roads. Facade modulation, architectural elements, and •echanical units or service areas will be screenedM•buildings Parking that is either under the structures or behind the •stories highBuildings within this area will be between 1 and 4 •DESIGN:Commercial/Retail•family -Multi•USES:Design elements from the TMISAP. C Zone-C–Vertically Integrated High Density Residential Vertically Integrated High Density ResidentialUse Commercial/Retail and -C Mixed-C–Rezoning CUP (4 required)18+ Qualified Amenities22% Qualified Open Space2 BR)-apartments (1-216 Garden•BR)3 -336 Townhomes (1•family units-552 Multi13.69 units/acre15 Zone-Proposed R~ 40 acres VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 2 BR)-apartments (1-144 Garden•BR)3 -222 Townhomes (1•family units-366 Multi(red area)INITIAL PHASE VANGUARD CROSSING- TWO STORY TOWNHOME STYLE VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP THREE STORY GARDEN STYLE APARTMENTS VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP CLUBHOUSE VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP Central Amenity -CUP Picnic/BBQ, Game LawnStructure, Pathways, Pickleball, Play with Clubhouse, Pool, Area Northwest Amenity Area VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP with Dog Park, Pathways Northeast Amenity Area VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP with 2nd Pool, Pool House Southwest Amenity Area VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP with Play Structure and BBQ Southeast Amenity Area VANGUARD CROSSING-CUP with 2nd Dog Park, Pathways CUP Pedestrian Circulation Gathering Nodes and SeatingPurpose Pathways, -with Multi Central Spine Amenity VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 22-8-comment letter 2WASDVANGUARD CROSSING- CUP VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP )p.9ACHD staff report (the site.” alternative access is available to based on the study, until approximately 3,000 daily trips E zone, which equates to -Munits and the -approximately 366 multi3,000 daily trips, or of development that generates be restricted to the first phase “Therefore the applicant would VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 788 trips2,307 tripsPM peak hour820 trips1,844 tripsAM peak hour9,268 trips23,317 trips WeekdayTRIP GENERATION(VANGUARD)(MERIDIAN CROSSING)CURRENT APPLICATION EXISTING APPROVAL VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP Both changes supported by Planning and Zoning Commission.access to front doorcompliant -24”, which prevents ADA-Eliminating requirement to elevate front porch 18”(2)Variation in roof pitch for amenity buildings and TH garage shed(1) :Requested changes to Design Standards VANGUARD CROSSING- THANK YOU Supplemental Information CUP Trip DistributionVANGUARD CROSSING- CUP Franklin Interchange–Hwy 16 VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP Hwy 16 ImprovementsVANGUARD CROSSING- CUP ParkingVANGUARD CROSSING- CUP ClubhouseStory Townhome-2Story Apartment-3 VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP Building Type VarietyVANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 22-6-Presentation to Meridian City Council 4Facility PlanWASD VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 22-6-Presentation to Meridian City Council 4Facility PlanWASD VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 22-6-Presentation to Meridian City Council 4Facility PlanWASD VANGUARD CROSSING- CUP 22-6-Presentation to Meridian City Council 4Facility PlanWASD VANGUARD CROSSING- 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 22-1975: An Ordinance (ACHD Maintenance Facility H-2021- 0029) for Annexation of a Parcel Located in the SE % of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Ada County, Idaho, and Being More Particularly Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City Of Meridian; Establish-ing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification of 30.27 Acres of Land orom RUT to I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing that copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required By Law, and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Page 155 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-038675 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/20/2022 08:19 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 22-1975 BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, BY THE CITY COUNCIL: HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE (ACHD MAINTENANCE FACILITY H-2021-0029) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL LOCATED IN THE SE '/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 30.27 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit"A"are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re-zoning by the owner of said property, to-wit: Ada County Highway District. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to I-L(Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,rescinded and annulled. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—ACHD Maintenance Facility-H-2021-0029) Page I SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 19TH day of APRIL , 2022. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 19TH day of APRIL , 2022. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: 4-19-2022 CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) County of Ada ) ss: On this 19th day of April 2022,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Meridian,Idaho MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3-28-2028 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—ACHD Maintenance Facility-H-2021-0029) Page 2 EXHIBIT A Legal Description ACHD Ustick Property -Annexation A parcel located in the SE %of Section 34,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County,Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point marking the southwest corner of said SE %.,from which a point marking the southeast cornerof said SE%bears S 89'07'11"E a distance of 2640.61 feet; Thence along the westerfy boundary of said SE Y,N 0043'44" E a distance of 1290.37 feet to a point on the centerline of the five Mile Creek; Thence along said centerline, also being the southerly boundary of that annexation parcel as described in Ordinance No. 784, Instrument No. 98003485, records of Ada County, Idaho, the following described courses and distances: Thence S 89°04'31"E a distance of 434.23 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 98.65 feet along the arc of a 337.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 16°46'20" and a long chord bearing S 80'41'21" E a distance of 98.30 feet to a point; Thence S 72*1 V V E a distance of 182.16 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 117.40 feet along the arc of a 458.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 14°41'10" and a long chord bearing S 79°38'46" E a distance of 117.07 feet to a point; Thence S 86459'21"E a distance of 940.67 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 99.31 feet along the arc of a 229.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 24°50'50"and a long chord bearing N 80°35'14"E a distance of 98.53 feet to a point; Thence N 68"09'49"E a distance of 145.45 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 53.16 feet along the arc of a 143.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 21°18'00" and a long chord bearing N 78°48'49" E a distance of 52.86 feet to a point; Thence N 89°27'49"E a distance of 362.98 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 42.20 feet along the arc of a 65.00 foot radius curve right,said curve having a central angle of 37°12'00"and a long chord bearing S 71°56'1 V E a distance of 41.46 feet to a point; Thence S 53°20'11"E a distance of 243.43 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said SE%; ziil d blut imns ACHD Ustick Prcpeity Annexation Job No 21-22 Page t of3 ACHD Maintenance Facility-2021-0029 Thence leaving said Five Mile Creek centerline and along said easterly boundary of the SE 1 S 0°53'03°W a distance of 43.02 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly boundary N 64°08'05"W a distance of 295.14 feet to a point marking the northeasterly corner of McNelis Subdivision as shown in Book 100 of Plats on Pages 13082 through 13084,records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the northerly and westerly boundary of said McNelis Subdivision the following described courses and distances: Thence N 89°07'41°W a distance of 303.80 feet to a point; Thence S 64"49'45"W a distance of 277.37 feet to a point; Thence N 86'15'46'W a distance of 701.30 feet to a point; Thence S 81*07'09"W a distance of 287.40 feet to a point; Thence S 2°46'23"E a distance of 140.80 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 122.51 feet along the arc of a 100.50 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 69°50'36' and a long chord bearing S 37'41'41" E a distance of 115.06 feet to a point; Thence S 72°36'59"E a distance of 105.95 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 152.82 feet along the arc of a 290.92 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 30°05'54" and a long chord bearing S 57°34'02" E a distance of 151.07 feet to a point; Thence S 42"31'05"E a distance of 45.13 feet to a point; Thence continuing along said boundary and the extension thereof S 36°50'13" E a distance of 861.51 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of said SE'/,; Thence along said southerly boundary N 89'07'11"W a distance of 84.44 feet to a point marking the southeasterly corner of"Parcel C"as shown on Record of Survey No.6018, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence leaving said southerly boundary and along the easterly boundary of said "Parcel C" N 37°06'59"W a distance of 584.06 feet to a point marking the northerly comer of said"Parcel C", Thence along the westerly boundary of said"Parcel C"S 0°09'49"E a distance of 49.81 feet to a point marking the northeasterly comer of"Parcel B"as shown on said Record of Survey No.6018, also being the northeasterly comer of that annexation parcel as described in Ordinance No. 02- 992, Instrument No. 103012606, records of Ada County, Idaho Thence along the northerly and westerly boundary if said parcel the following described courses and distances: 7® ACHD Ust[ck Property Annenuon �� ,..cs .y+nwar�wes.A Job No.21-22 Page 2 or 3 ACHD Maintenance Facility- 2021-0029 Item#9. Thence N 36°49'52"W a distance of 255.94 feet to a point; Thence N 42°30'43"W a distance of 45.13 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 100.29 feet along the arc of a 190.92 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 30*05'55° and a long chord bearing N 57°33'40" W a distance of 99.14 feet to a point; Thence N 72°36'38"W a distance of 105.95 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 72.79 feet along the arc of a 200.50 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 20°48'42° and a long chord bearing N 62°12'37" W a distance of 72.39 feet to a point; Thence S 0'48'30" W a distance of 760.49 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of said SE'f; Thence leaving said boundary and along said southerly boundary N 89°07'1 V W a distance of 825.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 30.27 acres and is subject to any easements exist;ng or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Q�p,L LA iv Land Solutions, PC S T t G April 14, 2021 0 11118 118 � E Y��Yr P of C:0 tiTON W l�ii d—Sb�>t}� ACHo Uslick Properly Annexation Job No 21-22 Page 3 of 3 ACHD Maintenance Facility- 2021-0029 Page 162 EXHIBIT B ACHD USTICK PROPERTY - ANNEXATION LOCATED fN THE SE 114 OF SECTION 34, T4N, R1 W, BM, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO C 1/4 S89_17'01'E 1/4 2647.77' - - - `-34 35 r CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE I I CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING I CHORD UNE LENGTH BEARING TINE LENGTH BEARING CI 9&0' 337.DO' 16'46'20' 580'41'21"E 98.30 L1 182J6' S7218'11"E L8 1D5.95' 57236'59'E C2 11740' 450.00' 1441'10' S79'38'46"E t17.07' 1-2 145.45' N66'09'49"E L9 45.13' 542'31'O5"E C3 99.31' 229.00' 24'50'50' N80'35'14'E 98.53'1 L3 243.43' S53'20'11"E L10 04,44' N89'07'11"W b a I C4 53,16' 143.GO' 2118'00" 478'48'49'E 52.86' L4 43.02' SO'53'03'W 1.11 49.81' SIM'. I a a C5 42.20' 65.00' 3712'00' S71'S6'fl'E 41.45' L5 295.14' N64'08'05'W LI2 45.13' N42'30'43'W �I C6 122.51' 100.50' 69'50'36" S37'41'41"E !115,06' L.8 277.37' S64'49'45'W L13 105.95' N72-35'38"W C7 152.82' 290.92' 30'05'54' S57-J4'02"E 151.07' L7 140.80' S2'46'23"E C8 100.22' 190.92' 30'05'55' N5713 WIN 99,14' I,p C9 72,79' 200.50' 20'48'07" N62'12'37"W 72.39' ` - 7-- nvE MILE CREEK _ _ 362.98' ry S89'04'31"E-Cl��� ,CT N89'27'49"E-5-, 434.23' �Cz =S86'59'21"E-940.67'---_�3-�� l�:2 4 S81 N89*07'41"W M I 287.40 N86'15'4fi'W 701.30' '303.80' IS 53 r ANNEXATION AREA 30.27 ACRES N o r PARCEL 5043443WOO 3764 W. JSTICK RD, L rLn d Co � f POINT BEGINNING c�,sy� Eta 34 N89'07'11"W 825.29' _ 795.86' I _ - 935.01' _ 34 35 3 1/4 BASIS OF BEARING 2640.61 R USTICK RD. _ 3 2 `a ,LLANO STAR GAc 4a hl = Lin olutions iM1h 1 ��O C�/-9lF �O �v Land Surveying and Consulting �' ZQ0 Q00' 800' . OF 231 E.5TH ST.STE A W.NP' MERIOIAH ID 83642 f2GD)2882cm (268)26&2557 Tar +mow�arbsa�,ws.wz ,10 No.21-22 Page 163 ACHD Maintenance Facility- 2021-0029 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY : William L.M . Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . oil /V i3f jo�� William L. M. Nary, C ty Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 224975 An Ordinance (ACHD Maintenance Facility H-2021 -0020) for annexation of a parcel of land located in the SE 1/4 of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Ada County, Idaho ; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 30 . 27 acres of land from RUT to I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code ; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by laws and providing an effective date . A fall text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B . ] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — ACHD Maintenance Facility- H-2021 -0029) Page 4 Page 159 Item#10. (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 22-1976: An Ordinance (Moberly Rezone H-2021-0089) for Rezone of a Portion in the Northeast % of the Southeast % of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 0.159 Acres of Land from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to 0-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law, and Providing an Effective Date Page 164 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-038674 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/20/2022 08:19 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 22-1976 BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, BY THE CITY COUNCIL: HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE (MOBERLY REZONE - H-2021-0089 REZONE) FOR REZONE OF A PORTION IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 0.159 ACRES OF LAND FROM I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO O-T (OLD TOWN) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION,AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for re-zoning by the owner of said property, to-wit: Moberly Holdings, LLC. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby re-zoned from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to O-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances,resolutions,orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. RE-ZONE ORDINANCE—MOBERLY REZONE H-2021-0089 PAGE 10 SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned,with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half(1/2)plus one(1)of the Members of the full Council,the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one(1)reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 19TH day of APRIL 2022. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,thisl9TH day of APRIL , 2022. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK 4-19-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 19th day of April 2022, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT E. SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing At: Meridian,ID My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 RE-ZONE ORDINANCE—MOBERLY REZONE H-2021-0089 PAGE 2 OF 3 EXHIBIT A Item#10. Description for O-T Zone December 9, 2021 A portion of the in the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8" Iron pin marking the centerline intersection of N. Meridian Road and W. Broadway Avenue, from which a 5/8" Iron pin marking the centerline intersection of W. 3rd Street and W. Broadway Avenue, bears North 89025'49" West, 956.87 feet; thence on the centerline of W. Broadway Avenue, North 89025'49" West, 323.00 feet to the centerline of NW 1 st Street; thence on the centerline of NW 1 st Street, South 00030'09" West, 246.25 feet to the easterly extension of the north boundary line of the South 3/4 of Lot 9, Block 2, J.M. Andersons Second Addition to Meridian, as file in Book 2 of Plats at Page 87, records of Ada County, Idaho and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing on said centerline, South 00030'09" West, 43.75 feet to the easterly extension of the south boundary line of Lot 10, Block 2 of said J.M. Andersons Second Addition to Meridian; thence on said south boundary line and the easterly and westerly extension thereof, North 89025'49" West, 158.06 feet to the centerline of a public alley; thence on the centerline of the public alley, North 00030'09" East, 43.75 feet to the westerly extension of the north boundary line of the South 3/4 of said Lot 9; thence on said north boundary line and the easterly and westerly extension thereof, South 89025'49" East, 158.06 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 0.159 acres, more or less. This description was prepared using record data as shown on Record of Survey No. 9863, recorded as Instrument No. 2014-056419, records of Ada County, Idaho and was not verified with a survey on the ground by Idaho Survey Group, LLC. End of Description. LA SOON GEIVSF� G 11779 N��2��,9/Zoz fro �0p9TF O F SDP p� YM MCCK Page 168 Page 1 of 1 ttem#�o. EXHIBIT B NScale: 1"=60' 010 30 60 120 Basis of Bearings • _ _ N89'25'49"W 956.87' _ � 475.81' � 158.06' _ - �- 323.001- - �Q I I I ? W. Broadway Ave. a m � a rt l I O I I o 1 I a I O I I O I L0 N 4 Z (D I N N rt to 6 to J.M. Andersons 17 0 Second Addition o I O I Block 2 I O I Real Point S89'25'49"E 158.06' of Beginning 9 Southerly 314 N00'30'09"E t0.159 Acres S00'30'09"W 43.75' 10 43.75' S89'25'49"E 158.06' I 11 I 12 I I 13 I I \oNNL AIVp s \,\GENSF GAG Union Pacific Railroad ILA CC 0 CL 11779 (P Z��/44.6 0 �p TF O F \� yM MCCN NW let Street 21-527 dw Rezone De-dw 12 9 2021 ...51:53 AM IDAHO Exhibit Drawing for 21b527 SURVEY 9OIS ,IDAHO8LD 3704 0—T Zone SheeDNo. BO8)84 DAHO 83704(208)846-8570 GROUP, LLC A portion of the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 12, Page T.3N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY : William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . /jd& 2 . ', a Ji William L. M. Nary, tity Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO, 224976 An Ordinance (Moberly Rezone 11-2021 -0089) For Rezone of a Portion in the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 0 . 159 Acres of Land from I-L (Light Industrial) Zoning District to O-T (Old Town) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date . A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B . ] I II RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - MOBERLY REZONE H-2021 -0089 PAGE 3 of 3