HomeMy WebLinkAboutCasa Meridiana AZ
RECEIV"ED
APR 0 5 2006
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LA WAND
DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of Annexation and Zoning of 7.58 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-15
(Medium-High Density Residential) AND Conditional approval of 31 Multi-family
residential buildings 6.9 acres, for Casa Meridiana, by Daas Laney, LLc.
Case No(s).: AZ-05-067 and CUP-05-060
For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 11, 2006
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April II, 2006
incorporated by reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 11, 2006
incorporated by reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April
11,2006 incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of April 11, 2006 incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code
codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of
Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code §
II-5A.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FfNDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-O5-067 and CUP-O5-060 - PAGE 1 of 4
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected
party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Site Plan, and the Conditions of
Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 11, 2006
incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the
applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's Annexation and Conditional Use as evidenced by having submitted the
Site Plan dated REVISED March 6, 2006 is hereby conditionally approved;
2. The following modifications to site specific conditions were made at the City Council
hearing:
a. None.
3. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff
Report for the hearing date of April 11, 2006 incorporated by reference.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits (as applicable)
1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration
Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a
maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City.
During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the
conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,
and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or
structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the
final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with
multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the
event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple
phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-O5-067 and CUP-O5-060 - PAGE 2 of 4
from the original date of approval. lithe successive phases are not submitted within the
one (I) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and
void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the
period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.l, the Director may authorize a single extension ofthe
time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional
time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the
Commission may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may
require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code
Title II.
E.
Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat
or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis.
Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than
twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request
for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period witrun which a Petition for
Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body ofthe City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 11, 2006
F.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-O5-067 and CUP-O5-060 - P AGE 3 of 4
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
,2006.
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUNW ARDLE
COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
TIE BREAKER
MA YOR TAMMY de WEERD
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
ATTEST:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK
Copy served upon:
Applicant
Planning Department
Public Works Department
City Attorney
By:
City Clerk's Office
Dated:
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-O5-067 and CUP-O5-060 - PAGE 4 of 4
day of
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April ¡ ¡, 2006
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Hearing Date: April 11, 2006
Meridian City Council
Planning Commission
Staff: Joe Guenther, Associate Planner
Meridian Planning Department
208-884-5533
cM'eri;;¡l:n -~; ,
"
,.,
'Ii
~,
, .. ID.\HO j~
'Q~.-, ./: '
~~~ ~1"
'-,'it"... _'' " .., ,~. <
"'--~' :,-,,"'-'-.;"!f!.!.. .~" .nfm
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Joseph Guenther, Associate City Planner
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067 - Annexation and Zoning of 6.9 acres from RUT to R-15 (Medium-
high Density Residential)
CUP-05-060 - Conditional Use Pennit for Multifamily development
PS-05-003 - Private Street for providing frontage to multifamily site.
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant, Insight Architects, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Pennit (CUP) to construct
multifamily development on 6.9 acres within the future Casa Meridiana condominium development
located at the southeast comer of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road.
The site design is showing thirty one (31) multifamily units and one clubhouse/activity center on one
parcel which requires a conditional use pennit in an R-15 district. The applicant has requested all
internal circulation to be designed as private streets, and the site plan shows one access to Victory Road
as an entry point.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
On February 16, 2006, the Commission continued the Casa Meridiana project to the March 2,2006
hearing due to over-scheduling of the agenda and with the applicant's consent. The applicant's initial
request included gated streets which are prohibited with the Meridian Unified Development Code.
ACHD has commented on the report and has made a special notice including a recommendation that the
streets be public roadways, provide stub streets east and south, and will promote cut-through traffic.
ACHD has not commented on the revised drawing dated March 6, 2006.
Staff has reviewed the design dated March 6, 2006 and all comments have been incorporated into this
report. Staff still holds concerns that the overall design of the site would exceed the capacity of the
private streets as designed. The applicant has reduced the street sections from a 26'interal roadway to a
24' wide section for the entire site. The multifamily development will receive detailed approval with this
application; however there are still several items to be addressed through conditioning. Staff would
support moving the application to the City Council for approval with a redesign that would show
compliance with all requirements of the UDC as detailed in this report.
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard the item on March 16, 2006. At the March 16,
2006 public hearing they moved to recommend approval.
a. Summary of Public Hearing:
i. ill favor: Russ Phillips (applicant's representative)
ii. ill opposition: None.
iii. Commenting: Eric Oaas, Applicant.
iv. Staff presenting application: Joe Guenther
v. Other staff commenting on application: None.
b. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
Casa Meridiana
AZ-O5-067PS-O5-003/CUP-O5-060 Page 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April!!, 2006
i. Gates - which are not allowed by the UDC
ii. High groundwater
iii. Cut through traffic
iv. Private streets for what is essentially single family residences.
v. futerconnectivity of the private road system
Vl. Redesign of the development to provide internal access from adjacent parcels
instead of Victory/Locust Grove Roads
vii. Access to major road systems or local road access only.
viii. Emergency service drives instead of stub streets
c. Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation:
i. To make the north/south leg of the private streets including the stub street to the
south to be dedicated public streets.
d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. Public versus Private Streets.
Staff is recommending approval with a redesign of the subject applications (AZ-05-067, PS-05-003 and
CUP-05-060) subject to the conditions noted in this report.
PROPOSED MOTIONS (to be considered after the public hearing)
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number(s) AZ-
05-067 and CUP-05-060 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 11, 2006,
with the following modifications to the conditions of approval: (add any proposed modifications).
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number(s) AZ-05-
067 and CUP-05.060 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April!!, 2006, for the
following reasons: (you should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation or plat and you
must state specific reason(s) for denial of the conditional use permit.)
Recommend Continuance
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number(s)
AZ-05-067 and CDP-05-060 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the
following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
3. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
SE comer of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road
Township 3N, Range IE, Section 29
b. Owners
Oaas Laney, LLC
519 W. Front Street
Boise Id, 83702
c. Applicant:
fusight Architects
2238 Broadway Ave
Boise Id 83706
d. Representative: Russ Phillips, Insight Architects
e. Present Zoning: RUT-Ada County
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Casa Meridiana
AZ-OS-O67PS-OS.OO3/CUP-OS-O60 Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
Medium Density Residential- 2002 Comprehensive Future Land Use Map
g. Description of Applicant's Request:
1. See Exhibit Al (prepared by Insight Architects) for a copy of the site plan which
depicts the lot layout, building, parking and access locations with adjoining subdivisions,
Exhibit A2 shows the proposed landscape plan, and Exhibit A3 shows detailed
elevations.
h. Applicant's Statement/Justification: The application notes that the Medium Density
Residential designation provides for the overall site to be developed in a unique configuration
that attracts a new market of customers to this area. The applicant notes that the site is an
ideal location for a condominium/multifamily complex and will provide the additional
landscaping along drive aisles, the design review for structures, and develop the new private
streets to limit traffic movement in the area.
4. PROCESS FACTS
a.
The subject application will in fact constitute an annexation and zoning as detennined by
City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Unified Development Code Title 11
Chapter 5 Article B Section 3, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this
matter.
The subject application will in fact constitute a conditional use / multifamily development
as detennined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Unified
Development Code Title 11 Chapter 5 Article B Section 6, a public hearing is required
before the City Council on this matter.
b.
c.
Newspaper notifications published on:
Council- March 20, 2006 and April 3, 2006
Planning Commission - February 13, 2006 and February 27,2006
d.
Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on:
Council - March 31, 2006
Planning Commission - February 3,2006
Applicant posted notice on site by: January 17, 2006
e.
5. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): Bare land, single family residence along Victory Road.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: Large lot residential to the south, infill
residential north of the site and agricultural east and west of the site.
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
1. North: Sageland Subdivision, Zoned R-8 with a Planned Development
2. West: Undeveloped small lot agricultural, Ada County RUT
3. South: Tuscany Lakes Subdivision zoned Meridian City R-4 and undeveloped Ada
County RUT
4. East: Undeveloped Ada County RUT
d. History of Previous Actions: The Commission heard this item on March 2,2006. At that
hearing they directed to applicant to redesign the site to meet the following concerns: provide
Casa Meridiana
AZ-O5-067PS-OS-OO3/CUP-OS-O60 Page 3
CITY Of MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April!l, 2006
one stub street to the south, eliminate the Locust Grove access, and consider making the
streets public.
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities
1. Public Works
Location of sewer:
of this property.
Location of water: Water is located in the full frontage of both S. Locust
Grove Road and Victory Road.
Issues or concerns: High ground water and wetlands. Stonn drain disposal will
be problematic with the high groundwater.
2. Vegetation: AgriculturaVIrrigated
3. Flood plain: N/A
There is sewer in Victory Road near the northwest comer
4. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: Several ditches/canals cross the site. These laterals
appear to be for drainage as well as local user groups.
5. Hazards: High groundwater
6. Size of Property: 6.9 acres
7. Description of Use: Attached townhouse and associated residential amenities, front
accessed products with no internal fencing.
f. Landscaping
1. Width of street buffer(s): per the Future Land Use Map, both Victory Road and
Locust Grove Road are designated as "Collector Roadways." As such, the UDC
(Table 11-2B-3) requires a 20-foot wide street buffer adjacent to both roadways. The
landscape plan (Sheet L.l) proposes a 20-foot wide buffer along these roadways.
2. Percentage of site as open space: The open space contained in the residential uses is
not calculated on the site/landscape plan. UDC 11-3G-3A requires a minimum of 5%
open space, the site plan includes several water features and internal open spaces
which would appear to be consistent with the required 5% open space. The
calculation should be reduced to not include any landscape buffers and would be
required if approved. The applicant shall clarify these calculations to be consistent
with the amenity standards found in UDC Chapter 3, Article G.
3. Other landscaping standards: The landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road and
Victory Road should be constructed in accordance with UDC Chapter 3, Article B.
This would include the modification of the evergreen trees shown on the landscape
plan, UDC 11 ~3B- 7C-3c as evergreen trees shall be used sparingly and in clusters.
4. Fencing - The applicant is proposing a solid block (stucco) fence around the site with
limited access points which will be controlled by iron gates. The walking paths to
connecting multi-use pathways are also proposed as gated. The applicant is not
proposing internal fencing with the exception of limited three foot stucco fences will
enclose the private open spaces and four or six foot iron fences will enclose the pool
and activity center uses.
g.
Conditional Use Infonnation:
1. Non.residential square footage: To be detennined, 3,128 square feet shown for the
Casa Meridiana
AZ-OS-O67PS-OS-OO3/CUP-OS-O60 Page 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF Aprilll, 2006
activity Center
2. Proposed building height:
23.5 feet (Sheet A.30) R-15 allows 40 feet
3. Percentage of site devoted to building coverage: Not defined
4. Percentage of site devoted to landscaping: required minimum of 5%
5. Percentage of site devoted to paving: Not defined
6. Percentage of site devoted to other uses: Not defined
7. Number of Residential units: 32
h. Amenities - The applicant is providing a clubhouse, recreational facilities behind the activity
center and additional open space for the residential amenities with multiple water features and
internal pathways.
UDC 11-4-3 .27D-2b requires three onsite amenities with one ITom each category.
UDC 11-4-3.27D - - a. Quality of life amenity - Clubhouse (activity center)
. b. Open Space - Water Amenity
- c. Recreation - Walking trails and Sports courts
i. Off-Street Parking (residential uses) - provided within the R-15, to meet the multi-family
standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3.27. The conceptual design appears to meet these standards
which will be certified through the certificate of zoning compliance process. The site layout
provides for two garage stalls for each dwelling unit which at maximum will be designed for
2,400 square-foot units with a 20-foot x 20-foot parking pad. Fifteen of the thirty.one parking
pads currently do not meet the 20-foot x 20-foot standard as required by Table 11-3C-2. The
applicant shall certify that a 20-foot x 20-foot parking pad has been planned for each unit in
front of the required two enclosed spaces.
The applicant is also proposing ten parking stalls (one handicap) for the activity center.
Standard gathering places require one space per 500 square feet and ofthe approximate 3,128
sq/ft activity center; this would require six parking stalls. The applicant has met the minimum
standard for the most restrictive district.
j. Proposed and Required Residential Standards - R-15 and R-I5 bulk standards apply as found
in UDC 11-2A.
R-15 (Standards)
Setbacks (*all streets private) Proposed Required
Street Setback to Living Area ** 0 IO
Street Setback to Garage** 15 20
Side 4 4
Rear (unit 19) 6 12
Frontage 0 0
Lot Size 0 2,400
Maximum building height 23.5 40
** As measured from back of sidewalk
Staff has concerns that the applicant, by using a private street system for essentially attached
Casa Meridiana
AZ-OS-067PS-05-003/CUP-OS-060 Page 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April I!, 2006
single residential, that they do not meet the intent of the district or the associated setback
standards.
n. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access (private, public, common drive, etc.):
The applicant is proposing all streets, public connections and internal circulation to be private
streets.
The applicant is proposing one new access point to Victory Road to serve the Casa Meridiana
project at approximately 520' east ofthe Victory/Locust Grove Intersection.
This request is not supported by ODC 11-3F-4.4 Standards for Private streets: Gates: Gates
or other obstacles shall not be allowed. A variance may not be granted to this standard.
Variances can only be applied toward relief from a dimension standard. Variances may not be
used to approve a use, such as a gated street, which is otherwise prohibited. The applicant has
been infonned that the only mechanism to allow gated streets would be to request a zoning
ordinance text amendment. They have not submitted such an amendment. If the gates are not
approved, as recommended, staff is concerned that the applicant is creating a competing street
network with these private streets.
ACHD has issued the following statement:
Special Notice to the City of Meridian
. The applicant is proposing to construct the transportation network within the subdivision
as private streets. By constructing these roadways as private streets, the District and the
City of Meridian lose any chance of obtaining connectivity in this area. Essentially, this
comer would be an enclave that is completely separated from all ofthe surrounding
neighborhoods. District staff strongly recommends that the internal streets be required to
be public roadways that can provide stub streets to the east and to the south to provide
interconnectivity. The cormectivity to the surrounding parcels would provide additional
access for emergency services, eliminate multiple access points to major roadways
(collector and arterial roadways), reduce vehicle miles traveled, connect neighborhoods
and have the ability to increase the sense of community in the area.
. The "L-shaped" roadway that the applicant is proposing is similar to what was proposed
with Sageland Subdivision. When Sageland Subdivision proposed a similar roadway
network, the City of Meridian was ~ concerned with potential cut through traffic and
required the installation of landscape islands. This proposal may promote cut through
traffic on a private roadway network.
ACHD followed up with a letter dated March 22, 2006 with thefollowing notices:
.
District staff cannot support private stub streets for several reasons. If a private stub street
is constructed, the District has no ability to require the extension of that stub street in the
future because the roadway is not under the jurisdiction of the Highway District. It is not
the intent of the District to have networks of private streets that essentially serve a public
street function. If it is detennined that there is a public need for a stub street to the south
from this development, then the street stub ought to be public.
.
For this particular application, District staff believes that the City needs to detennine if
private streets in this location meet the needs of the City. If the City determines that
private streets are appropriate in this location and for this project, District staff
recommends that no stub street be required. If the City detennines that public streets are
Casa Meridiana
AZ-OS-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
in the best interest of the City, then the entire development should be required to have
public streets, and a stub street should be provided to the south property line.
For a detailed report on ACHD's actions and comments, please see the letters/reports
subllÚtted with the application materials. Staff is recommending the applicant consider
elillÚnating the access to Locust Grove Road and providing a public road to Anùty Road with
a public stub street to the property south of the site. The internal roadways may be allowed as
private streets if approved.
6. AGENCY COMMENTS MEETING On January 27,2006, staff held an agency comments
meeting. The agencies and departments present included: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian
Police, Meridian Public Works Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staffhas
included all comments and recommended actions as Conditions of Approval in Exhibit C.
7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS The subject site is designated 'Medium
Density Residential' on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and the
applicant has generally drawn the annexation request for the R-15 district to follow the Medium
Density Residential District. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, medium density is
defined as areas including single-fallÚly homes at densities of three to eight dwelling units per
acre. The proposed density (4.6 d.u./acre) is within minimum target density of 3 to 8 d.u./acre for
Medium Density Residential, staff finds that the proposal confonns to this stated purpose and
intent.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply
to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy):
.
Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services.
(Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1)
When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the
subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the lands
proposed to be annexed in the following manner:
. The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire
District. Once annexed the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian
City Fire Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the
Meridian Rural Fire Department.
The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff's
qfJìce. Once annexed the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police
Department (MPD).
The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained
by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD). This service will not change.
The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District #2. This
service will not change.
The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This
service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no
revenue loss as a result of the subject annexation.
.
.
.
.
Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department,
the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian
Casa Meridiana
AZ-OS-067PS-OS-003/CUP-05-060 Page 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing
Services, and Sanitary Services Company.
.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D: Encourage appropriate land uses along transportation
corridors.
Staff believes that the proposed residential land uses are appropriate along the adjoining
transportation corridors
.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 2: Restrict curb cuts and access points on
collectors and arterial streets.
The ACHD evaluates access points in their analysis; no direct access is allowed to any of the
collector roadways. The proposed access points to the arterial streets generally comply with
ACHD's standards. Please see the ACHD staff report and Exhibit B for the conditions from
ACHD. Locust Grove and Victory Roads are classified as collector roadways. The applicant
is proposing access from both public roadways with internal circulation being private.
Public connection to adjacent residential developments is proposed from gated micropaths
and sidewalks which will providefuture connection to residential areas west and south of the
site. Staff believes that the design as shown limits the existing and planned residential areas
in the vicinity by constraining adjacent properties to extend sewer and water services in the
rights of way, requires future development to obtain the offset access points, and does not
facilitate interconnectivity between parcels.
.
Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent
parcels (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1)
The properties adjacent to the subject site are designated for residential uses. North of the
site is existing medium high residential uses at approximately 5.5 dwelling units to the acre,
east of the site is vacant, and west and south of the site are medium density residential uses
and expected to continue these uses as per the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map.
The project provides a transition from the less dense Tuscany development to higher density
R-15 District which would be compatible with the smaller parcel development occurring
closer to the intersection of Locust Grove and Victory. The applicants have included
residential to residential fencing along the south and east boundaries as well as by providing
amenities and open space connections. .
.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 5: Require appropriate landscape and buffers
along transportation con-idor (setback, vegetation, low walls, benns, etc.).
The applicant is proposing to constroct appropriate buffers along all of the adjacent collector
roads. By ordinance, a minimum 20-foot wide landscape buffer is required adjacent to
collector roadways. The landscape plan shows the appropriate landscape buffers.
Staff also finds the following 2002 Comprehensive Plan text policies to be applicable to this
application:
.
"Require all new parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands." (Chapter V, Goal
III, Obj. D, #3, page 43)
"Eagle Road is the major north-south arterial in Ada County. The capacity of this arterial
should be protected by núninúzing the number and location of private driveway access
cotUlections to this important roadway. The City should recognize, adopt, and help implement
the Eagle Road Access Control Study, prepared by ACHD in 1997." (Chapter VI, page 71)
.
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-O5-003/CUP-OS-060 Page 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April]], 2006
.
"The capacity of arterial. . .roadways can be greatly diminished by excessive driveway
cormections to the roadways. The City should cooperate with ACHD to minimize access
points on arterial. . .roadways as development applications are reviewed." (Chapter VI, page
72)
"Develop methods, such as cross-access agreements, frontage roads, to reduce the number of
existing access points on to arterial streets." (Chapter VI, Goal II, Obj. A, #12, page 79).
"Identify transitional zones to buffer commercial and residential uses, to allow uses such as
offices and other low intensity uses." (Chapter VII, Goal I, Obj. B, #7, page 102)
"Restrict curb cuts and access points on. . . arterial streets." (Chapter VII, Goal lV, Obj. D,
#5, page 107)
.
.
.
8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. Allowed Uses in the Residential Districts: UDC Table 11-2A-2Iists multifamily development
uses as conditional uses in the R-15 zoning district.
b. Purpose Statement of Zone:
MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-15) the purpose of the residential
districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a
requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable
density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated
within the density range. Residential land uses are also allowed within the O-T, TN-C, and TN-R
districts as set forth in Chapter 3 Article D.
c. General Off-Street Parking Standards (from UDC 11-3C-5):
The following standards shall apply for off-street vehicle parking for nonresidential uses: In all
Commercial Districts the requirement shall be one (1) space for every five hundred (500) square
feet of gross floor area. Although the use is not in a commercial district the general standard for
non-residential uses may be applied. The applicant has provided adequate off street parkingfor
the amenity.
d. Multifamily Development (UDC 11-4-3.27) The following standards shall apply for the
multifamily units, including standards for Site Design, Common Open Space, Site Amenities,
Architectural Character, Landscaping, and Maintenance.
Architectural Character-Multifamily Development (11.4-3.27.E): All structures in Multifamily
Development are subject to the design standards listed in this section. The overall elevation shall
be reviewed by staff and shall be approved prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning
Compliance.
Landscaping (11-4-3.27.F) Additional landscaping standards for street facing elevations apply to
this site.
11-4-3.27.G All multifamily developments shall record legally binding documents that state the
maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including
but not limited to structures, parking, common areas, and other development features.
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
e. Outdoor storage/refuse areas (11-3A-12): Outdoor utility meters, HV AC equipment, trash
dwnpsters, trash compaction and other service functions shall be incorporated into the overall
design of buildings and landscaping so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are
fully contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets.
9. ANALYSIS
9a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation
The AZ/CUP/PS application appears to substantially comply with the Unified Development
Code. However, there are several areas of clarification and some modifications required to both
the site plan, cross access, and public road design prior to a recommendation of approval. Below
are several special considerations for the P&Z Commission to review at the public hearing:
Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation
1. AZ Application (AZ-05-067): Based on the policies and goals contained in the
Comprehensive Plan and the general compliance of the proposed development with
the Zoning Ordinance, Staff believes that this is a good location for the proposed
development. Please see Exhibit D for detailed analysis of the required facts and
findings for a Zoning Amendment.
The annexation legal description submitted with the application (stamped on
11/28/2005 by Delson Brown, PLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Meridian.
The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water
service extension. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this
project will have to be removed from their domestic service when services are
available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
All future development of the subject property shall be constructed in accordance with
City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. All future uses shall
not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by
reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
UDC 11-5B-3D provides the P&Z Commission and City Council the authority to
require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement with the City of
Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Due to the
close proximitv of existing and future residential uses and the submission of a
conditional use request. staff believes that a Development Agreement is not necessary
to ensure that this propertv is developed in a fashion that is consistent with the
comprehensive plan designation and does not nellativelv impact nearbv properties.
Staff believes that a Development Agreement should not be required with this
application as the applicant has submitted a conditional use request which would
address all the implications of the annexation.
Special Considerations:
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 10
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April!!, 2006
Sidewalks: The applicant is proposing to construct 5-foot wide attached sidewalks on
the internal streets/drive aisles. The applicant is proposing to plant trees on the back
side of the sidewalks, but staff believes that additional trees should be planted at the
driveway cuts and closer to the curb to provide the pedestrians with cover and to
make the streetscape more attractive.
Land Use Buffers: UDC requires landscape buffers between different land uses. Per
UDC 11-3B-9, a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along collector streets. The applicant
is showing a 15-foot wide setback buffer between the condominium homes and the
future potentially detached single family residential lots. Staff feels that the
perimeter landscaping serves as a buffer and shall contain materials in accordance
with UDC 11-3B-9 and not include impervious surfaces such as parking areas or
driveways. The proposed pathway connections east and south shall be landscaped in
accordance with UDC 11-3B-12. See Exhibit B below.
ACHD: The ACHD staff report submitted for this application specifically requests
the Planning Commission and Council to consider amending the design to provide
for interconnectivity between the other three parcels in the near vicinity to the comer
of Locust Grove and Victory Roads. Staff supports ACHD's request but would add
that the access point to Locust Grove Road had potential to be moved to the parcel
south of this site with a stub street from this property to the south. The parcel to the
south would then be required to stub services and a public street to the east. These
changes would meet ACHD's concerns for interconnectivity. Lastly, the Planning
Commission and Council should consider that ACHD would prefer these streets to be
public.
Private Streets: The design dated March 6, 2006 shows the private streets to connect
from Victory Road and stubbing to the property south of the site. Staff feels that
either design stretches the intent of the private street standards for providing access to
multifamily units.
Staff would recommend that the applicant consider eliminating the Victory Road
access after construction is completed in the following fashion: 1.) The Victory Road
access point would become an emergency drive similar as to the approval for
Sageland subdivision on the north side of Victory Road, these emergency accesses
would align and provide an escape route recommended by Emergency Services. 2.)
Staff anticipates the property south of the site to have access to Locust Grove Road
and would prefer the private street connection to a local road and not a
collector/section line road. This design would accomplish the applicant's goal of
achieving exclusiveness and seclusion on the comer as well as meet ACHD's
requirements that the private streets not be a competing road system. 3.) Staff would
also request the applicant eliminate the cul-de-sac turnarounds and loop the private
streets to increase the area around the perimeter of the site as to allow more common
open space and less paved surfaces, only if the access point to Victory Road is
restrained to emergency services only.
CUP Application (CUP-05-060): The proposed Conditional Use request substantially
complies with the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Elevations: The applicant has submitted building elevations ofthe proposed structures.
The application lists the proposed building materials, including stone, brick, stucco and
timber to be accented with chrome, aluminum and gloss painted trims. ODC 11-4.3
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 11
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
requires multifamily structures to comply with the design standards listed in this section.
Staff feels the elevations submitted with the CUP significantly meet the requirements of
the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19.
The elevations will need to be reviewed prior to issuance of CZC to comply with the
following ordinance standards:
a.
All building elevations shall have a minimum portion of the elevation devoted to
architectural features designed to provide articulation and variety. These features shall
include, but are not limited to windows, bays and offsetting walls that extend at least two
(2) feet; recessed entrances; and changes in material types. Changes in material types
shall have a minimum dimension of two feet (2') and minimum area of twenty-five (25)
square feet.
b. Main entrances, which are the primary point(s) of entry where the majority of building
users will enter and leave, shall be designed as an obvious entrance and focal point of the
building through architectural treatment, lighting, and address identification.
c. Entrances shall be adequately covered, recessed, or treated with a penuanent architectural
feature in such a way that weather protection is provided.
d. Roof fonus shall be distinctive and include variety and detail when viewed from the
street. Sloped roofs shall have a significant pitch. Flat roofs should include distinctive
cornice treatments.
e. Exterior building materials and finishes shall convey an impression of permanence and
durability. Materials such as masonry, stone, stucco, wood, terra cotta, and tile are
encouraged.
f.
Windows are required to allow views to exterior activity areas or vistas. Windows shall
be provided on any building facing any common area used for children's recreation.
g. All roof and wall-mounted mechanical, electrical, communications, and service
equipment should be screened from public view from the adjacent public streets and
properties by the use of parapets, walls, fences, enclosures, or by other suitable means.
2. Refuse/Service Area Screen: Neither the Site Plan nor Landscape Plan call-out how or if
the refuse/service area on the north side ofthe activity center building will be screened.
UDC 11-3A-12 requires the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully
contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets. The applicant's
CZC application must clearly demonstrate how this standard is met.
3. Cross Access: The property to the south will be providing a point of access to Locust
Grove Road and an access is also proposed from this site. The applicant has provided a
revised design with the access point to the south as a private street.
4. Private Streets: The applicant is proposing to use private streets to provide future access
to Locust Grove and Victory Roads. The applicant has submitted a Private Street
application as required by UDC 11-3F -3. The private street standards are listed in UDC
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 12
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
11-3F. The applicant shall design and construct the private streets in compliance with the
standards listed for Private Streets in UDC 11-3F Private Streets if allowed. See Exhibit
B. The Meridian Fire and Police Departments are requesting a minimum of 24' paved
sections for the private streets. These standards would not allow on street parking which
the Meridian Police Department has considered inadequate for this size of development.
5. Common/Open Space: The applicant has a qualified application meeting the
requirements of UDC 11-3G and UDC 11-4.3.27c. The proposal is showing centrally
located open space which appears to be a minimum of 5%. The applicant shall certified
that qualified open space in the residential district which meets the requirements of a
minimum of 5% open space has been provided with the final approval of the Certificate
of Zoning Compliance. See condition of approval 1.1.3
6. Multi-Use Pathwav: The applicant is required to install a micro pathway connection into
the site to the east as shown. The pathway along the Ten-Mile Creek is the major
pedestrian connection to sites west and north of the site.
7. Amenities: The applicant is required to provide three amenities for multifamily
developments with 20 to 75 units. The applicant is showing qualified site amenities as
follows:
11-3G-3C-1 - Quality of life amenities - Clubhouse
11-3G-3C-2 - Open Space amenities - Open grassy area, ponds/water features
11-3G-3C-3 - Recreation amenities - Pool, walking trails, sports courts
Amenities are generally located in centrally accessible locations. These common areas
shall be maintained by the Casa Meridiana (Home or Users) Owners Association. The
landscape architect shall certify that one tree per 8,000 square feet of lawn has been
provided on the landscape plan.
PS-05-003 Private Street
Design Standards: The private streets shall be placed in a pennanent easement as the site
is not projected to be platted. ACHD shall approve all points of access. If the private
streets are denied then the applicant shall contact ACHD to determine the method of
transfer of any public streets. The private street shall provide sufficient maneuvering area
for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Meridian Fire Department.
The Meridian Fire has commented below. Gates or other obstacles shall not be allowed.
Street Names: The private streets shall have street names as determined by the Ada
County Street Naming Committee. The street names shall be approved prior to issuance
of a CZC.
Fire Lanes: The revised 24' roadway shall be defined and signed as a fire lane with no
parking allowed.
9b. Staff Recommendation: Based on the above analysis, staff fmds the AZ/CUPIPS
applications may conform with the Comprehensive Plan policies and UDC standards. As noted
under "Special Considerations," we recommend the Commission consider requiring the applicant
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 13
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
to make certain concessions to make the private streets safer for internal traffic. Staff
recommends approval of the AZCUP/PS application subject to the conditions of approval listed
in Exhibit B. Staff has provided findings consistent with a recommendation for approval.
10. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. Site Plan (AS.!, REVISED dated March 6, 2006)
2. Landscape Plan (L-1, stamped REVISED dated March 6, 2005)
3. Elevations (A3.0, dated November 23, 2005)
B. Legal Descriptions
C. Conditions
1. Planning Department
2. Public Works
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Parks Department
6. Sanitary Services
7. ACHD
D. Required Findings from UDC -
1. Atmexation
2. Conditional Use Pennit
3. Private Street
Casa Meridiana
AZ-05-067PS-05-003/CUP-05-060 Page 14
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
Exhibit AI: Site Plan (AS.1, REVISED dated March 6, 2006)
. ,-
L--,
!
j --- -" ,,-,_,:::_l~':.l:"T_,ç8av£ 80^U
j
:ii/I "j' """,
.'~' "-", ;~,~ ()
. ". "
-" "': '
. " " 1'1 ,----"
"1f I"
, , ;1 (
/ ,I
-,--~""; ",- // ',' "
!,~ i '-:,' "1/ (---",\. "
:~;!- "¡,,-' :~,' ,~,,:> - I
n~ .'} ~~ I . 11; ~ '--'\1 ,
~'ii;
~1 J"""".,-;~~_-'1!, : "fr ,'~ .. (" l :¡
, , .. ¡,-': ' !~ ' '~ /!; j) '=,
~¡,' ;-~:~'I:;":" , /~-':'/~L;:!
i "'!"'-.': .'~" 1,/ , ":ii1: '1;
!¡,I,,\"--\~',']' \¡ , O""'j:..[t\ ':;:.) (--\".' j¡
;,1: ..¡,\ );0' :"~' I "'~'" "":"1,,;,,-;
:!;'.:'~:';/)\,'-':"":.::,,' ',"'" ':,:
,,'111: '.' ',,;' ,- ,\,' ,"k--<-~ ' '-. - i - J; " " .'-------'-'"--.::,:,:"",.;, .-' :
r ,r~ ii!':" -' I ----u_---._____m'" .. L ,
[: j ,/:\"(,'<;-'f::-"~~--,-,-",,:::-l---:,~::_,.;t___i:~~_-:::~::_~~."'::~:jJ;!: ":1.~ !
liÙ,\'9'\<'\,,'ii-'1"';'¡-í""!~' "1"'"t.",¡", I
¡ -""" / ',z¡: ¡" ' , -, '
, :' 1\ él., :; ,.' , ,,'" .,;::
! ¡, ':¡J" 'I ! ~ IaI1 : Þi! , , ..... I '
J --_:~(~~~,- ::'::-~j 1- - ,;:. "",'.-,.- -'" .- _: "..,,- - ,,';", :-:~-~-----: - :-~:'-~'>-~ - --I
I ;.C'U=-JPlO «,,~,~,- '- " \\)~
I' ',,- ".,:",,- . l\J ....~
\.- ~ \\ I:I.,\\Ù\~G
"'~"","\"' ,',Jè"
- ... I\; ,,~
~j:;.~\~-'
,
T'------------' -,
"
,
.:, '
, --
, ".1, :
i
I
,
r ,
I
.. ¡
"
"
, ,
,---," ~
"
~)
q~
¡I
!i
hi
¡
¡
!
il.:'
, ("
;,-,':
"'Æ'
I,;;
i,,:
,:"
l;
.';
r,;
"
¡! j!
:- ;1; I ¡ I "lfìl=J~W~66~vEl_"OPME~_..,--,..,- ',','
(~_i I! ' ~,.c~ ' ,
J
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit A Page 1
..L
,..---------..,---
i ..
ß;.
r
!
---,
\ .
"
~ :
" ..
'1""
X,~~
.--' -;
,;,
.
.. ,If" '^,
,ci' ': "..' ' ")
, .~,-",
¡'
, ,,"
. '
:
",,¡,,~:I :.-,', ,," ¡INSIGHT;".. "."",. . i'~w <.,.,,:~"
,...---. -,-"'" ,'.""'" ," ~",~
------..", , ..------....-....---..---
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April J I, 2006
Exhibit A2: Landscape Plan (L-l, stamped REVISED dated March 6,2005)
~)
;r:1
,:!~
q
9 llil ¡ m ij
II " I IJ'
'.~) /
"-L~ ...-.;,)\
,I ¡¡ ¡i 'I' ;'I
¡'J' ,I I ,Ii
! I ~ pI
ii' I
(I I' 1,1
II "
I ~"~~ .¿
. \
§ lId
¡~ j 'I
I
S. lOCl/ST GIIOV¡ RooD
I
II
"
ill
r-
,~,
.. I
I.
! ~
"
I'i
¡
,
¡
-,- ,
..J
1---;-'; ;-~ 'i--~-~-¡llíiiÎnÜ¡;;IW¡i I~
H III, Ii ¡!ì il.l, fUtf¡li,fl~ll~ I ! 'i
IH:H'11~.'d¡l¡ l»r!lfUÌ1¡!:¡';
'. .. I '/1 " !I' ,"t ,.I, ,.1
ill I, 'iill~ llb'j!'i'¡'c
,II II I I ! II' , : I " JI/I,
¡ i I I I I) H ni fl
l__-- L ---~c J II II 11!
. , fll , f I
0 ~ 0
h 1
~~f~i~f !i~ r i lill
r I I I ~
I ,Ii
I ,
s-tJ., .
:::.::i"::'
"., ~
',. -',-..
i~J~:~¡:;:;J-_l I~I~~==~~;::.
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit A Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11, 2006
ExhibitA3: Elevations (A3.0, dated November 23, 2005)
""""','H "."',<' ';"".. "....
. \1 ",,' ""," ..' ",'.
.., t",
I"
',ì '
II I I
II I
Ii I ~
f¡ I I
I I
I I
I ~,
I
I
"
'¡if
II I :
q I I
I
:L::';
~I;:
-<
~~ '
~ "
I
I
r~lï!r II!--]) ¡¡¡¡r ~~ -T-I~ ""';1'NBlmI~~~¡¡;¡¡..:c-;; ¡~I
l-~- I lj!LLI11~¡_~~AC~~~-~-~t.Ÿ,jL-~- 'L__" r~::__'~~~~~-~~'~:_~~'~;;~~J
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit A Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
Exhibit B: Legal Description -
Annexation
Pf"¡âCCI'
Date;
Page;
(¡,'iOO/)
N\JVembcf 28, 20(¡.'i
lofl
BOUNDARY DJi;SCRfI'TION
A parcel of land situated in the northwe~ '/., of the northwest Yo of Section 29, Township
3 North, Range lEast, Boise Meridian, Ada OlUnty, Idaho, more Particularly described
as follows;
BI<;GINNING at the northwest comer of said Seclion 29, from which comer, the V.
comer common to Sections 29 and 30 beam, S.OOQOO'Z4"E., 2645.69 feet; thence. along
the north line of said Section 29,
I)
2)
S.89"49'J I"£" 620.22 feet; thence, along a line parallel with the westetly line
of said section,
S.OooOO.24"E., 532_61 feet; thence, along a line parallel with the northerly
Jine ofsaid section.
N.89°49'U"W., 620.22 feet to it point on the westerly line of said section;
thence, along said westerly line,
N.OooOO.Z4"W., 532.61 fcello the POINT OF BEGINNING.
3)
4)
SAID PARCEL containing 7.58 acres, more OT less.
SUBJECT TO, all Covenants, Rights, Righls-of-Way, Easements of Record, and
Encumbllll1ces.
ExmBIT "B" attached, and by this rcferol1cc, made a part hereof
C:\!RR\O~"'n~.ry Untir<.~oc
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit B Page 1
m(")
&~
-.00)
g:~
t;I; ~.
;p~
cw ;
N
!
EXHIBIT "B"
I
, A PARCEL Of LAND SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF THE NW1/4
Of SEC1l0N 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST,
BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, IDAHO.
2005
I
¡
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
19 20 VICTORY ROAD
~_____S89.49'11-': 1340.26' W 1/16 COR
SO n- - ~----=-=-t
II - -- @J
i ' ,:~
I I P!
~, I~
~ ~ 7.158 ACRES "..,
~.II ~
~ ~I I~
~ ~ ' j§
tffL I
B~ I
S B -- Ñir4ø'1 IV -820.22 ----l
. g
rolll
;
S~9
0
100
200
400
600
t
, ¡
, ';
BROKAW SURVEYING & i.W'PlNG
¡ 105~ Lone 5!11r, Rd., Nompo, ID.
208-249-0479
[-fl:L~(!!OO! \¡'¡'J ÔCI:III:I)' ["~""'g 1:.\TE:IHò-(5 ,n",}:::;
"'-'
i
n
::;
-<:
0
.."
:¡:
t'I1
:::c
a
;;
z
."
l'
>-
Z
Z
Z
C1
a
t'I1
."
>-
:::c
-3
:¡:
m
Z
-3
tI'
-3
>-
."
"T'j
;:tJ
t'I1
."
0
:::c
-3
"T'j
0
:::c
-3
;r
m
;r
t'I1
>-
~
z
C1
a
>-
-3
tT1
0
.."
>-
"0
2.:
tV
0
0
0..
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April!!, 2006
GO) 1y
,. ,
!';(lc-()J1C
",,', ",""""
ADA CO~lirY R[C1ROEft J. /JAVIO I«vAIIRo
BOISe IDAIIO 62111106 12:24 PM
Oe,uTY Bonnie Obor&l/UO
REQoRlìfD.. REQUEST OF
Tilli 0tJ£
AUOIWr ,.n:1
fllIIM'"II/IIllIlIflllllllfl! III III
19SÐ17Ð36
Order Nr>.: AO536659
WARRANTY D£1';O
FOR V ALUR REC\'illVED, the receIpt and suffici"ncy of which are hereby aclrnowlcdg-"d,
RUSSELL V, LIDDELL, an unmauied JI1IIn, dealing with his ~ol" and separate po'()peny,
the "Grantor, n does hereby grant, bargain sell and convey unto
OAAS LANEY, LLC, an Idaho limited liability Company.
whose CUrrent addmss is 519 W. Front Sireet, Boise, IV 83702,
tin, "Onmtee," the following described premises, in Ada County, Idaho, TO WIT,
Beginni", at Ihe Northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quafter of SecTion
29, ToWn>hip 3 North.1ùnge I East, Boise Meridian, Ada Collnty, Jd4ho which poinl will be
lenown as the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
South 89.49. East 620,22 feet along Ihe Northern boundary of said Northw~sl Quarter of the
Northwlltit Quarter of said Section 29 to a point; thence due
South 532,61 feet along a line parallel to tlm Westerly boundary of said Northwest Quaner ¡¡fthe
Northw'=$t Quarter of said Section 29 to a point; thl>nce
North 89°49' West 620.22 feet along a Jine parallel Tn the said Northern boundary It, a point on
said Wostern bQunda¡y; thence
Northerly 532.61 fQCt along said Weslern boundary 10 Ibe REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.
BXCEPT ¡he following parcel;
Beginning at the Northwe&t corner oflhe Northwest Quafter of Ihe Northwest Quarter of S"ction
29, Township J North. Range I East, Boiae Meridian, Ada County, IdMo; thence
South 89°49' East 390.22 feet along tbe Northern boundary of "aid NorthWð" Quarter of The
Northwest Quarter of said Section 29 to a point, whioh point will be known as the REAL POJNT
OF BEGINNING; thence
South 89.49' East 188 feet along the Northern boundary of s/lid NorthweSl Quarter of the
Nol1/lweat Quarter of gajd Section 29 to a point; thenoe due
South 167 feet alona a line parallel to The Westerly boundary of said Northwest Quarter oftho
Northwest Quarter of said Section 29 to a point; thence
North 89°49' Wesl 188 feet along II line parallel to the said Northern boundar)' to a point; the'1ce
N¡¡rtherly ]67 feet aJ¡¡ng II line parallel 10 the W"SlerJy boundBJ'Y of said Nonhwest Quarter Oflhe
NOrthwest Quarter of said Section 29 To said Northern boundary of said Northwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter o(said Section 29 fa the REAL POINT OF VICTORY RESIDENCE
PROPeRTY BEGJNNmG.
En 39,/"
:JTI ",1<"-" 51¡1\10
/ F,4~f;(þ"w,
ç,~:c ¡
,or, c<" ) "" IT"
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit B Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11, 2006
lilj 39\1d
Casa Meridiana
Exhibit B Page 4
TO HA VI; AND TO HOLD the <aid l>femise<, "it/¡ thL'11' "ppUnenaHces WI(O (he <aid
GrQntee, hejr~ al1d INsigm foIevcr. S"id Grantor does ¡""eby cr'l-enant 10 I",d whh Ih~ said
Grantee, that he j, th,\ OWner in fee- simple of said pr"mis(è.s; rhat ¡hey HIe ti-ee from ,,1/
t¡ncUmb,ance5 EXCEPT t!Jose enclJmbraacê~ set forth 011 Exhibit A altaçhed hel't'tn and mAd" a
part h~ cof. to which Ihis (;Ul1v"yance i~ ~"prr~~ y mild" subje.cl, lI"d IhMe made_, suffered Or done
by the Grantee; and ~ubjoct to all exis!lIIg patent rtservations. I'asements, right(s) of Way,
protective covenants. >"'njog '!rdjn~nçe~. and ilPphcable building codes, laws and r"gulsuon$,
goner,,! tax.s "lid assessments, ¡Mlllding irrigation and utility "as~mer"s (if any) {or the curnmt
year, which ale not due and paYðhle, IInd thai Gr/mtor will warr"'1t and dcfMd the salllC from all
lawful claims wh~ts(>ever.
Þ<;>"So
State of Jdaho
COWIty of Ada
()q thisl.lt.l~f February, 2005, before me, the undersigned. a Notary Publiç, personally IIppeared
Russell 'v. Liddell, known!O m~ or proven 10 me olllhe blJ5is ofss¡f9faclOry evidençe to be the
penon whose e i bscribed 10 Ihe within insrr-ument and acknowledged ro mt¡ that he
executod - e me.
-I
""""-"C",",,,
t~r.;"::~ '\:\
~ ...~ I
ß * \v-
't I'U'~ " ~
\.,pl' "'.-. ?~J
.,.-trEo\,9'
""'-,.,,:,.,,",
Notary Public
Residing at: 4--oi "'"
My commìs,ion expires: ro/si/ D
::)1'1 ,1"3H71 SWU
¿ bSbb('.ÞSß¿
55 :S]:
SIJl)U l¿:/t t
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
1.1.6
1.1.7
1.1.8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
C. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS- (Cas a Meridiana)
1.1.1
The site plan labeled as AS.1 prepared by fusight Architects, dated revised March 6, 2006, shall
be redesigned (if required) as detailed by the conditions listed herein and the comments received
at the March 16,2006 hearing.
The applicant shall complete conditions of approval 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 and submit the required
copies to the Planning Department a minimum of 10 days prior to the scheduled City Council
hearing.
The landscape plan prepared by fusight Architects, labeled Sheet L-l, is not approved with these
applications. A landscape plan consistent with UDC 11-3B shall be submitted with the amended
site plan which reflects any redesign required of the subdivision consistent with the hearing date
of March 16, 2006. The following should be included in a revised landscape plan:
.
The applicant shall certify that one tree per 8,000 square feet of lawn has been provided,
exclusive of Rights of Way.
The applicant shall certify on the landscape plan that a minimum of 5% square footage of
the site is provided as open space, exclusive of required landscape buffers.
All interior private street landscape trees shall be Class II trees, consistent with parkway
standards.
A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape architect, designer,
or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan and submitted prior to City
Council signature of the Final Plat. All standards of installation shall apply as listed in
UDC 11-3B-14.
.
.
.
The site design shall be amended to meet the following multiuse residential standards:
. The applicant shall provide a 20x20 parking pad for all units. UDC 11-3C-6
. The fencing plan shall show all common space separated from Victory Road and Locust
Grove Road by a minimum ofa four foot barrier. UDC 11-4.3.27-C.4
. All units, including overhangs shall be shown outside of required landscape buffers.
Units may encroach into setbacks as allowed by UDC 11-2A-3D
The applicant shall contact ACHD to determine that the private roads are not deemed a
competing road system. The applicant shall certify on ACHD letterhead that this finding can be
met prior to the City Council hearing.
The applicant shall detail the groundwater monitoring in this area. As high groundwater may
affect the required drainage and construction standards of the City of Meridian.
A detailed fencing plan shall be submitted consistent with the site plan dated January 18, 2006 for
clearer definition of fencing along the perimeter of the subdivision. The applicant is not
proposing a fence along Locust Grove and Victory Roads, however all common open space may
require fencing to provide a barrier as required by UDC lI-4.3.27-CA.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy the perimeter landscaping and fencing shall be
installed or a surety agreement shall be in place. Construction or bonding for the multi-use
pathway shall also be completed prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for Casa
Meridiana.
1.1.11
1.1.12
1.1.13
1.1.14
1.1.15
1.1.16
1.1.17
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April I!, 2006
1.1.9
Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the Casa Meridiana
Business/Home Owners Association(s).
The applicant shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards shown in UDC 11-3A~1l for all
common areas and street lighting.
Comply with UDC ll-3A-12 regarding a screen for the refuse/service area.
No irrigation pump station or facility is shown on the Site Plan. However, if one is proposed for
the site, it must be located outside of any required street buffer. Impervious surfaces are
prohibited in said buffers.
Provide cross access/cross parking agreement(s) for all lots in Casa Meridiana Subdivision. All
cross access drive aisles shall only approach the ACHD approved points of access to the public
street system. Maintenance of the aisle and parking areas shall be provided for in a note on the
face of the final plat, AND/OR in a document such as CCR' s.
Other than the points of access approved by ACHD, direct lot access to public roads are
prohibited.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
1.1.10
1.1.18
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS-PRELIMINARY PLAT
1.1.19
1.1.20
1.1.21
1.1.22
Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision
pursuant to City Code.
Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed
such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as
proposed by staff.
All areas approved as open space shall be free of wet ponds or other such nuisances. All
stormwater detention facilities incorporated into the approved open space are subject to UDC 11-
3A-I8 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and trees. Sand, gravel or other non-vegetated
surface materials shall not be used in open space lots, except as permitted under UDC I I-3A-I8.
If the stormwater detention facility cannot be incorporated into the approved open space and still
meet the standards of UDC 11-3A-18, then the applicant shall relocate the facility. This may
require losing a developable lot or developable area. It is the responsibility of the
developer to comply with ACHD, City of Meridian and all other regulatory requirements at the
time of final construction.
The applicant shall submit a detailed fencing plan with the final plat application for the
subdivision. If permanent fencing is not provided, temporary construction fencing to contain
debris must be installed around the perimeter prior to issuance of a building permit. All fencing
should be installed in accordance with City Code.
Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to
be mitigated.
2.5
2.6
2.7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT .FOR THE HEARING DATE OF Aprill J, 2006
1.1.23 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or
lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled, unless otherwise
approved by the Inigation District(s). Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or
non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can
not be obtained, alternate plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to final
plat signature.
1.1.24 Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or tenus of the approved
annexation/conditional use does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance.
1.1.25 Conditional Use approval shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in UDC 11-5.
2. Public Works Department
2.1
Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via extension mains in Victory
Road. The applicant shall install all mains necessary to provide service; applicant shall coordinate
main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard fonus of
easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains
is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub. grade is less than three feet than alternate materials
shall be used in confonuance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard
Specifications.
Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in S. Locust Grove road and
Victory Road. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this
development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works.
2.2
2.3
A second water connection in S. Locust Grove Road may be required to achieve adequate fIfe
flows, decision will be made at the time of construction plan review.
No sewer manholes or water valves shall be allowed in the landscape islands in the cul-de-sacs.
If water or sewer mains are to be routed under the landscape islands then no tress shall be allowed
in the islands.
The applicant shall be responsible for confonuance with any and all regulations ofthe u.S. Anny
Corps of Engineers regarding developing in or near classified wetlands. The applicant shall
submit all approval letters to the Public Works Department for review.
In discussions with the applicant's engineer they have indicated that they may employ ACHD's
road side swale design to dispose of stonu drainage. If this is the case the applicant's engineer
shall be responsible for inspection of the facility, and shall be required to submit a stamped
signed document stating that the swale was installed per design prior to certificate of occupancy
for each building.
Due to relatively high existing groundwater levels, applicant shall submit a Master Grading and
Drainage plan as part of the development plans to be submitted with each phase of this
development. The Master Grading and Drainage plan shall include at a minimum the following:
a. Groundwater contours for this development at peak seasonal high depth.
b. Finish floor elevation for all houses in this development.
c. Elevation of crawl space for all houses in this development.
d. Finish grade elevation at each lot comer.
e. Drainage flow patterns on all lots.
If structural fill is to be placed on any lot, material specifications and compaction requirements
2.4
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAfF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11, 2006
2.8
2.9
shall be detailed and submitted to Public Works and the Building Department.
If slab~on-grade construction is utilized in conjunction with typical footings, builders of each lot
shall comply with all requirements contained in the futemational Building Code regarding slab~
on-grade construction. The builder of each lot shall provide fill material gradation certification
and a minimum of one compaction testing report per 500 square feet of first floor area (including
garage) and provide such reports to the Meridian Building Department prior to commencement of
any framing.
The Master Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Public Works Department prior
to overall plan approval. Builders must provide fmish floor and crawl space elevation
certification for each house prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
Send updated groundwater report concurrent with construction plan submittal.
The applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public
right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easements shall be recorded as a
separate document using the City of Meridian's standard fonns. Submit an executed easement
(supplied by Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement
(marked EXHffiIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHffilT B)
for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO
NOT RECORD.
2.10
Prior to building pennits the applicant shall submit a recorded document to the Public Works
Department, that details ownership and maintenance of the private streets.
The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. The reason for this is to attempt
to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I-foot above that
groundwater elevation.
The applicant has indicated the pressure irrigation system in this proposed development is to be
an extension of the system in the Tuscany Development to the south. It shall be the responsibility
of the developer to acquire the necessary easements to extend the system to this development. A
letter of plan approval fonn Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District shall be submitted prior to
scheduling of a pre-construction meeting.
The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year.round
source of water (UDC 11-3A-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or
well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
signature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed ftom
domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9A-8. Wells may be used for non~
domestic pmposes such as landscape irrigation.
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or
lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6.
Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association
(ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to issuance of building pennits.
A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall
be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off~street parking areas. Stonn water
2.11
2.12
Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as deternùned during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat
per Resolution 02-374.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Pernùtting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Pernùtting
that may be required by the Anny Corps of Engineers.
Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by
the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fIre hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are
deternùned after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light
contractor shall obtain design and pernùt from the Public Works Department prior to
commencing installations.
3. Meridian Fire Department
2.22
2.23
2.24
2.25
3.1
3.2
3.3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DA TE OF April] J. 2006
2.17
treatment and disposal shall be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental
Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Stonn Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities
and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface water is
prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written
authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all
necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow
fujection Wells.
Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed,
drainage lots constructed, and road base approved prior to applying for building pernùts.
All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths,
pressurized iuigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
2.18
2.19
2.20
2.21
Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and
water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing.
One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for
duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500 feet
apart. futemational Fire Code Appendix C.
Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 W' outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec.
d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the
hydrant location.
e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers when spacing pernùts.
f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
g. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
h. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5.
1. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet of the project.
3.4 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and
shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide.
3.5 For all Fire Lanes, provide signage "No Parking Fire Lane"
3.6 Operational fIfe hydrants, temporary or pennanent street signs and access roads with an all weather
surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site.
3.7 The proposed 32-unit subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a total
estimated population of 100 residents at build out.
3.8 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure.
3.9 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy.
3.10 The Fire Dept. has concerns about the ability to address the project and have the addresses visible
from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact Vicki Heug1y at 898-5500 to
address this concern prior to the public hearing.
3.11 All aspects of the building systems (including exiting systems), processes & storage practices shall
be required to comply with the International Fire Code.
3.12 AIl portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150' of a paved surface as
measured around the perimeter of the building.
3.13
Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire Codes.
3.14 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) ITom a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by
an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fIfe hydrants and mains shall be
provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved
automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance
requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Group R~3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m).
b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183
m).
3.15 This project will be required to provide a 20' wide swing or rolling emergency access gate. The gate
shall be equipped with a Knox box Padlock which has to be ordered thru the Meridian Fire Department.
3.16
Emergency response routes and fIfe lanes shall not be allowed to have speed bumps.
3.17
Pool chemicals shall be stored in compliance with the International Fire Code.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ApriI1!, 2006
4.
4.1
Police Department
The Prior to release of building pennits, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for all off-street
parking in the multi-family development to the Pla1llling and Zoning Department. All parking
spaces shall be assigned to a specific dwelling unit or for guest use. The parking space
identification shall use a different numbering system than the dwelling units
The proposed multi-family development shall limit landscaping shrubs and bushes to species that
do not exceed three feet in height.
Any interior fencing shall allow visibility from the street or shall not exceed four feet in height if
solid fencing is used.
Parks Department
Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian Landscape
Ordinance ll-3B will be followed.
4.2
4.3
5.
5.1
5.2
Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard established in
the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance
Sanitary Service Company
Please contact Bill Gregory at SSC (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal and submit
stamped (approved) plans with your certificate of zoning compliance application.
7. ACHD -NOT REVISED based on the March 6, 2006 revised site plan. When received
ACHD amended conditions of approval shall also be considered conditions of approval for this
report.
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
6.
6.1
Dedicate 35-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Victory Road abutting the parcel by
means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance
of a building pennit (or other required pennits), whichever occurs flfst. Allow up to 30 business
days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will
not be compensated for this additional right-of-way because Victory Road is classified as a
collector roadway and is to be brought to adopted standards by the developers of abutting
properties.
Dedicate 35-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by
means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a walTanty deed prior to issuance
of a building pennit (or other required pennits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business
days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will
not be compensated for this additional right-of-way because Locust Grove Road is classified as a
collector roadway and is to be brought to adopted standards by the developers of abutting
properties
Construct Victory Road as one half of a 46-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and a 5-
foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalk.
Construct Locust Grove Road as one half of a 46-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and
a 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalk.
Construct a 26~foot wide private road that intersects Victory Road approximately 92-feet west of
the east property line, as proposed. Pave the private roadway a minimum of 20 to 24.feet wide
7.13
7.14
7.15
7.16
7.17
7.18
7.19
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF Aprilll, 2006
and at least 30~feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Victory Road and install15-foot
curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
7.6
Construct a 26.foot wide private road that intersects Locust Grove Road approximately 90-feet
north of the south property line, as proposed. Pave the private roadway a nùnimum of 20 to 24-
feet wide and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Locust Grove Road
and install15-foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
7.7
Provide a nùnimum of 50-feet of storage from the edge of pavement of Victory Road and Locust
Grove to the proposed gate.
7.8
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
7.9
Any existing imgation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
7.10
Private sewer or water systems are prohibited ITom being located within any ACIID roadway or
right-of-way.
7.11
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street ITontages abutting the site shall be
borne by the developer.
7.12
Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing
by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for
details.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the
State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall subnùt revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building pennit
(or other required pennits), which incorporates any required design changes.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The
applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days
prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during
any phase of construction.
7.20
No change in the tenus and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confinnation of any change ftom the Ada County Highway District.
7.21
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subj ect property unless
a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect
at the time the change in use is sought.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11, 2006
Exhibit D. Required Findings from Zoning Ordinance
UDC 11-5B.3E. Annexation/Rezone Findings:
The commission and council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed zoning amendment in tenus of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment
Á. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive
plan;
The applicant is proposing to zone the subject property to R-15. Staff finds that the
proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the
comprehensive plan. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, 'medium density' is
deEmed as areas including single-family homes at densities of three to eight dwelling
units per acre. The Council finds that the requested residential zoning designation, R-15,
is hannonious with and in accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future
Land Use Map, which designates the SE corner of Locust Grove and Victory Roads to be
"Medium Density Residential". The density proposed with the multifamily development
is consistent with previous Commission and Council actions and generally confonns to
the goals, objectives, and action items contained in the Comprehensive Plan for single
family residential developments in a medium density residential neighborhood. The
proposed density also is consistent with surrounding developments.
The Council finds that the proposed zoning is in general confonnance with the
comprehensive plan (please see Section 7 of the Staff Report for detailed analysis of
specific comprehensive plan action items that apply to this development).
B. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed
district, specifically the purpose statement;
Concurrent with the annexation and zoning application, the applicant has submitted a
preliminary that proposes single family residential products on a single lot for the subject
site (CUP-05-060) which qualifies as a multifamily development. The Council does not
anticipate that the applicant plans to rezone the subject property in the future if the
accompanying CUP application is approved.
The Council [mds that the various proposed residential uses would be allowed
(pennitted) within the requested R-15 zone with conditional approval and subject to the
specific use multifamily standards. The site is being proposed as one product of medium
density residential and upon build out staff would not anticipate changes of usage for this
site.
C. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
The applicant has submitted elevations for the proposed residential units and has agreed
to use the design guidelines for multifamily projects when designing building facades.
The submitted designs are consistent with the design criteria listed in the specific use
standards for multifamily developments. The Council finds that the proposed R-15 zone
with the proposed residential uses, if designed, constructed and operated in accordance
with adopted city ordinances, should be hannonious and appropriate in appearance with
the intended character of the vicinity. The site is intended for residential uses which,
based on the Comprehensive Plan description, includes multifamily/condominium
developments.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April 11,2006
The Council finds that the proposed development will change the existing character of
the area, which is largely urbanizing. ACHD has commented that this project may
impede future suITounding developments to the south and east of the site and the internal
private street system may not be in the best interests of the City of Meridian. The
Council fmds that the applicant should consider redesigning the project to accommodate
better interconnectivity (allowing the adjacent parcels to have public road access to
Locust Grove and Victory Roads) of the four parcels lying in the south east comer of
Locust Grove and Victory Roads.
The Commission and Council rely on public testimony (oral and written) to determine
whether or not the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or future
neighboring uses. The Council does not anticipate that the proposed uses will be
disturbing to future or existing neighbors as the presented design will severely limit the
interconnectivity to the east and south. Further, the Council does not anticipate that the
proposed uses will be hazardous as long as the applicant èomplies with the conditions of
revision contained in Exhibit C and all City Code provisions.
D. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of
services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City
including, but not limited to, school districts; and,
The applicant will be responsible for the extension of all utilities necessary to selVe this
proposed development. The applicant will be responsible for the extension of utilities to
and through this proposed development. Sizing and routing shall be coordinated with the
Public Works Department.
Other urban selVices, such as water, are near to this site and the applicant should be able
to extend such selVices to the site. Staff finds that the subject site is proposed for
development in a fashion similar to other properties in the area.
The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay park and highway
impact fees.
On February 10, 2005, a joint agency/department comments meeting was held with
representatives of key selVice providers to this property. Based on the joint
agency/department meeting and other comments received from agencies/departments,
staff finds that except for sanitary sewer, the public selVices listed above can be made
available to accommodate the proposed development. The Commission and Council
reference any written and/or verbal testimony submitted by any public selVice provider,
regarding their ability to adequately selVice this project.
If approved, the developer will be fmancing the extension of sewer, water, local street
infrastructure, utilities and irrigation selVices to selVe the project. The primary public
costs to selVe the future residents will be rITe, police and school facilities and selVices.
The Council finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and
that the proposed zoning and subsequent development will not be detrimental to the
community's economic welfare.
E. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3E).
The Council fmds that the annexation and zoninlZ of this property to R-15 with the
prOPosed multifamily desÜm. subject to the conditions of approval. would be in the best
interest of the City.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF April II, 2006
Conditional Use Findings UDC 11-5B-6E
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed
conditional use in tenus of the following, and may approve a conditional use pennit if they shall [md
evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish:
1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the
dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located.
The Council finds that the site is 6.9 acres and is large enough to accommodate all required
parking, landscaping, loading and other standard regulations required by the UDc.
2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in
accord with the requirements of this Title.
The Council finds that the proposed residential uses meets the objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan as listed in Section 7 of this report. Some of the standards of the UDC are not currently
being shown by the applicant's site plan and building elevations. Specifically, the site plan
needs to reflect interconnectivity desired by ACHD and the City of Meridian. If the applicant
makes these changes, this finding will be met.
3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other
uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the
same area.
The Council finds that the proposed residential uses complies with the uses pennitted in the R.
15 zone and those uses are consistent with the single family development of the general area.
The building height, parking layout, landscape buffer widths and other dimensional standards
shown in the application generally comply with the UDC. The applicant will be required to
construct the proposed landscape buffers on Locust Grove and Victory Roads.
4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not
adversely affect other property in the vicinity.
The Council finds that the proposed development will not adversely affect other property in the
vicinity if the applicant complies with all CUP/AZ conditions and constructs all improvements
and operates the use in accordance with the UDC standards. Traffic volumes will significantly
increase. However, ACHD has reviewed the amended application and the Council anticipates
special conditions to be placed on the applicant based on the Memo dated March 22, 2006.
These standards may include dedication, lighting, screening, landscaping and other areas
intended to mitigate potentially hannful effects.
5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE O.F April 11,2006
The Council fmds that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation are available to the subject
property. All other agencies have made comment that services are available to the proposed
use.
6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
The Council finds that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water mains into
the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The applicant and/or
future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees.
7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
The Council finds that the proposed development will not involve uses that will create
nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the sUITounding area.
The Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this
subdivision; however, the Council does not believe that the amount generated will be
detrimental to the general welfare of the public.
8.
That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
The applicant will be required to comply with all state and local ordinances regarding
conveyance of water and maintaining historic points of access. The Ada County Historic
Preservation Council's Site Inventory does not show any structures or places listed for the
subject property. The Council is unaware of any other scenic or historic features.
Private Street - UDC 11-3F-5
A. The Design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article;
The applicant will have to certify that the Ada County Street Naming Committee has accepted
the private street names. The design of the streets meets the standards as set forth in UDC II-
3FA, no gates are allowed. Roadway and storm drainage shall be contained on site. The
street width shall be a minimum of 24 feet of paved surface for all private streets other than
alleys. The current request continues for a gated site which is not consistent with these
standards, however the applicants revised drawing of March 6,2006 does not show gates on
the site plan as required.
B. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard, or nuisance, or
other detriment to persons property, or uses in the vicinity; and
The Council does not anticipate any hazard, nuisance or other detriment from the private
streets if they are installed and maintained as designed.
C. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan
and/or the regional transportation plan.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF' REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF Aprilll, 2006
ACHD has made comment on the proposed interconnectivity. The applicant shall contact
ACHD to make the finding that this is not a competing road system to the public roads.