HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 2, 2006 P&Z Minutes
-"
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 2, 2006
Page 40 of 90
Zaremba: -- we wish to continue.
Rohm: Okay.
Zaremba: And was the date April 6th? Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue AZ 06-
006 and PP 06-005 to our regularly scheduled meeting of April 6, 2006.
Moe: Second.
Newton-Huckabay: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Public Hearing AZ 06-006 and PP
06-005 to the regularly scheduled meeting of April 6, 2006. All those in favor say aye.
Opposed same sign? Motion carried. Thank you.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Rohm: Well, we have reached that 9:00 o'clock hour and we traditionally take about a
15 break here and we will reconvene at 9:15.
(Recess.)
Item 15:
Public Hearing: AZ 06-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 0.43
acres from RUT to L-O (Limited Office District) for Strada Bellissima
Subdivision Outparcel by Strada Bellissima, LLC - 3015 South Meridian
Road:
Rohm: At this time I'd like to reopen the Planning and Zoning meeting for March 2nd,
2006, and begin by opening the Public Hearing on AZ 06-002 and begin with the staff
report.
Wilson: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Strada Bellissima
Outparcel, as it has been termed, is an annexation of .43 acres from RUT to the L-O
zone. It is located on -- pretty much on the northwest corner of South Meridian Road,
State Highway 69 and Victory Road in south Meridian. When -- if I'm correct, when
Strada Bellissima came through, the owners did not have control of this parcel and,
therefore, it was left out of the development. They have since gained control and would
like to incorporate this parcel into their office development. It's a fairly straight forward
application that staff supports. We do have a conceptual site plan. This parcel ends up
being pretty much a parking lot. You can see the outline of the parcel here and it is
incorporated into the overall project that was proposed previously. No accesses to
Victory Road are proposed. We did include a requirement for a DA, specifically to
prohibit direct access to Victory Road, wanted to keep it to those internal roadways that
have been established. On that DA there was a condition included that should not have
been. It was a copy error from another report and that is the second to the last bullet,
which says prior to issuance of any building permit, the subject property shall be
£
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 2, 2006
Page 41 of 90
subdivided in accordance with the City of Meridian Unified Development Code. Staff
would recommend that that be stricken and the only non-standard condition in that
development agreement be the last bullet, which says no direct lot access to Victory
Road shall be allowed. I think with that I will stand for any questions from the
Commission.
Rohm: Thank you. Any questions of staff?
Borup: Done.
Rohm: No questions of staff. Would the applicant like to come forward, please?
Hobbs: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, Chris Hobbs with Pinnacle Engineers, 12552
West Executive. I have no details to add, unless you have any questions.
Moe: Mr. Chairman? Do you agree with the staff comments?
Hobbs: Yes, we do agree.
Moe: Okay. Thank you.
Rohm: Seems pretty straight forward. Any other -- any discussion?
Borup: Any public testimony?
Rohm: There is nobody signed up, but would anybody like to come forward and testify
to this application? Seeing none.
Moe: Mr. Chairman?
Rohm: Commissioner Moe.
Moe: I move we close the Public Hearing on AZ 06-002.
Borup: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we close the Public Hearing on AZ 06-002.
All in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Moe: Mr. Chairman?
Rohm: Commissioner Moe.
i
"-"
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 2, 2006
Page 42 of 90
Moe: I move we recommend approval to City Council of file number AZ 06-002 as
presented in the staff report for the hearing date of March 2nd, 2006, with the following
change.
Borup: Bullet point five on page five.
Moe: On what page?
Borup: Page five.
Newton-Huckabay: Page five.
Wilson: It would, actually, be in Exhibit B is where the--
Moe: Okay. Prior to -- yes. Under the -- on page five, under the second to the last
bullet point, where it starts out prior to issuance of any building permits, I would like that
item stricken. End of motion.
Zaremba: Second.
Newton-Huckabay: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we forward onto City Council recommending
approval of AZ 06-002 to include the staff report with the one modification. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. Thank you.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 16:
Public Hearing: CUP 06-005 Request for Modification of a Conditional
Use to allow zero lot line setbacks on Lots 1-6 Block 27, Lots 1-7 Block
28, Lots 1-7 Block 29, Lots 1-7 Block 30 of Quenzer Commons
Subdivision No.9 by Brighton Development - west of North Locust
Grove Road and south of East McMillan Road:
Rohm: Okay. Thank you. Thanks for coming in. At this time I'd like to open the Public
Hearing on CUP 06-005 related to the Quenzer Commons Subdivision No.9. And
begin with the staff report.
Guenther: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. This will be very
quick. As you can see, Quenzer Commons Number 9 is located in Quenzer Commons
Subdivision, it's all internal to the subdivision. With that this is a use request to change
the planned development. These lots are existing and the applicant is requesting to
eliminate the zero lot line setbacks for the garages as shown in the site plan. Staff
supports this. They have redesigned some of the turning radiuses in these alleys in
order to accommodate fire department requests. As you can see, there is an alley, the
alley connection is here and I believe there is one there. With this the applicant has