Loading...
Narrative V1CUEIDR IAy APPROVED DATE: 03/04/22 FILE NUMBER:-021002 February 3, 2022 �l �aY BRIGHTON CORPORATION Caleb Hood, Planning Manager City of Meridian Planning Department Meridian City Hall Alternative Compliance for Apex NW #1 Common Area Fencing Dear Mr. Hood, UDC Section 11-3A-7 requires fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots, noting specifically that its purpose is to distinguish common from private areas. That requirement is typical and applicable to common lots and pathways in conventional subdivisions. However, fencing "out" the central commons separates and potentially isolates residents from their neighbors, as well as from the "gathering" spaces and facilities designed to bring them together as a community —as in Apex NW #1, below. IDS IAy,> APPROVED 03/04/22 h the Alternative Compliance process, deletion of the required common area fencing °ATE proved for Paramount Director and Hill's Century Farm North, and we recently FILE NUM BrR A2G22G032 ted a similar request for Brighton's Cadence at Bainbridge community. For the same community objective —bringing residents together rather than separating or isolating them behind a fence —we request Alternative Compliance approval for Pinnacle NW which is being platted and developed as Apex Northwest Subdivision No.]. Similar to Cadence Bainbridge, the sidewalks surrounding the commons directly abut the front - facing lots. Thus, the landscaped area internal to those sidewalks is common, whereas the landscape from the sidewalk to the face of the dwelling is on private property. "Off -setting" the strict application of UDC Section 11-3A-7 are the location and accessibility of the community common features depicted below, including the large community center amphitheater. =MrM fir. y 40W WAINDram' PROPOSED ACTION Exhibit A.1 (Apex NW No. 1) shows the specific locations where common area fencing is proposed to be removed. Exhibit A.2 is an excerpt from the landscape plan. Revised Apex NW No. 1 landscape plans, with the noted fencing removed, is also provided for the City's project files. 2 APPROVED )A:P 03/04/22 IN CONCLUSION J %UtIBER'A-2G22-2 We are confident that this information, with the appended exhibits and revised landscape plans, address the City's Alternative Compliance requirements in lieu of Apex NW common area fencing; and we look forward to your consideration and approval. If you require additional information —or clarity, please let me know for expedited response. For Brighton Development, Josh Beach, Project Manager �E IDIAN> APPROVED DATE: 03/04/22 FILE NUMBER: A-2022-0032 7 ui Q x W RL Q !i 43'08"E 77.00' S89'42'21 "E 21 17'12"E 63.01' S89'43'08"E 60.00' L1 L10-1 L11 589'42'21"E 214.50' 1 43'08"E �L13 LC3 E. PHENOMENAL ST. BLOCK 2 50 9 52 63 O 55 56 57 69 O 61 62 63 ® 65 66 �-L6 58 F N89'42'21 "W 149.64' N89'42'21 "W 43'08"W 77.00' N83'59'43"W 115.57' E 1/16 CORNER FOUND 5/8-INCH REBAR. NO CAP. PLACED PLAS11C t2 (A L2 r- N89'4 43'08" N89'42'21'W 1320.00' E. LAKE HAZEL RD. EXHIBIT A.1 - APEX NW NO. 1 Fencing Removed by Alternative Compliance APPROVED )N: E. 03/04/22 k7 _ SCE `rUId BER'A-zozz-0oaz .. 1 E v.FtiC VF�a,^ . ��� r� `�} tiy`/��afc ll—�•�5..1`�<a S�r���� u 4.� �3 c__�k/—�~ I _�i `+�✓—,��•'� ;� I I R• I � m1l 11 ,) _ � I i I �j I1 CD: ; - ' ��. I I '♦ 11 ]. I � I I, I' EXHIBIT A.2 - APEX NW NO. 1 Landscape Plan Excerpt With Fencing Removed