HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 16, 2006 P&Z Minutes
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
February 16,2006
Page 85 of 95
Zaremba: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve
file number CUP 05-059 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February
16th, 2006, and the site plan labeled CU-1 dated October 26, 2005. I further move to
direct staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered the next
Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. End of motion.
Moe: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we approve CUP 05-059. All those in favor
say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. Thank you.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 18:
Public Hearing: AZ 06-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.99
acres from R2 to a R-4 zone for Buckeye Place Subdivision by John
Fackelman - east of Black Cat Road and south of Cherry Lane:
Item 19:
Public Hearing: PP 06-001 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 16
building lots and 2 common lots on 4.99 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for
Buckeye Place Subdivision by John Fackelman - east of Black Cat
Road and south of Cherry Lane:
Rohm: At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on AZ 06-001 and PP 06-001,
both items related to Buckeye Place Subdivision and begin with the staff report.
Wilson: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Buckeye Place
Subdivision is located south of Cherry Lane and east of Black Cat It's currently zoned
R-2 Ada County. It is surrounded by previously approved and developed subdivisions,
Castlebrook to the southwest, Rod's Parkside Creek to the east, Pintail Pointe to the
north, and to the south there is a -- we have Ten Mile Creek, Fuller Park, which is
owned by the Ada County Recreation District, not the City of Meridian, and, then, some
other existing subdivisions. As you can see, it is one of the last parcels in the area to
develop. It does have a stub road to the north property line that is proposed to be
continued into the project That did require a cul-de-sac variance for the length of the
cul-de-sac. Staff does support that There really is no other option. Ten Mile Creek is
on the south and west and there are developed subdivisions on the north and east So,
this is their only roadway connection, their only access to the site, and staff is supportive
of that variance. A couple things to mention. There is a pathway connection from the
southern terminus of the cul-de-sac connecting to Fuller Park. There is a City of
Meridian multi-use pathway that moves through Fuller Park along the Ten Mile Creek.
The applicant is proposing to do some off-site improvements to connect to that pathway
and also bring that pathway through their storm water drainage lot Staff is supportive
of that design. You won't be able to see it probably on this plan, but in the southwest
corner there is a 225 square foot lot, Lot 9, Block 1, that will be donated to the City of
Meridian to be included with that pathway. What that does is gives the pathway a little
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
February 16,2006
Page 86 of 95
more breathing room as it rounds that corner. It's extremely tight We felt like that the
safest and most efficient routing of that pathway would be accomplished by kind of
clipping the corner there. The applicant agreed to that So, that is their proposal. The
fire department did restrict on-street parking on Lot 20 and Lot 18 at the north edge of
the property, due to the landscape island that restricts fire access through there. So, I
have added a condition that there is no on-street parking on those two lots. I did speak
with some gentlemen in the audience that did have to leave, had some concerns about
traffic, so I will -- I will voice those to the Commission for them. They were the
homeowners association presidents of the surrounding neighborhood. I believe they
said to the north and to the west They were concerned about traffic at this location
here. And, I apologize, I can't read that street name. Golf View. They were concerned
about the additional traffic and construction traffic that this subdivision would add
through that intersection where they represented there has been many close call
accidents. So, I did tell them I would present their concerns. They are going to submit
their concerns in writing for the City Council hearing. I guess on that note I would just
add that when ACHD or the city or both required that this property be stubbed to, it was
anticipated that any development on this property would connect to that stub and route
through that subdivision. They did ask we consider some off-site improvements. It's
kind of outside the scope of this subdivision. They want some speed bumps and stop
signs elsewhere in this neighborhood. That would be outside the scope of what's before
you tonight And, once again, this traffic was anticipated by ACHD when they required
that stub street So, I think with that I will end staff's comments and stand for any
questions.
Rohm: Thank you. Questions of staff?
Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, just a comment on the portion that's going to be deeded to
Meridian, probably the parks department I noticed that in the staff report as I was
reading through it, but I didn't question it until you reminded me that the rest of Fuller
Park doesn't belong to the City of Meridian, it's Ada County Recreation or something
like that Would it make more sense to deed this portion to them and let them maintain
the whole thing or does the City of Meridian want that?
Wilson: The pathway is ours. I think -- and I could be wrong, maybe I'll let the applicant
help me out here. I think Ada County Recreation District's ownership is clipped at that
corner. I do not believe it continues around the corner. And so the pathway is the City
of Meridian's, so that's where that came from.
Zaremba: Okay. Thank you. The second question, actually, would be for Mr. Cole.
We have a letter from Mr. Mark Goins, I believe his name is, and on the first page of the
letter, line 20, he says: I am also concerned that if the catch basin is allowed to be this
small, runoff will regularly overflow into Ten Mile Creek and, then, he goes on to
describe how that happens and where it happens other places. Have you had a chance
to review whether or not you feel that catch basin is adequate?
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
February 16, 2006
Page 87 of95
Cole: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, Chairman Zaremba, the catch basin
I assume he is talking to the retention pond. Catch basin is, generally, a term used in a
street that catches the water and, then, runs it through a pipe facility to a underground
subsurface facility or a pond of this nature. ACHD is actually the governing entity of the
stormwater runoff. However, they do require that it's designed to take a hundred year
storm event So, this -- he calls it a catch basin, this drainage pond would have to be
designed to maintain a hundred year storm event In addition to that, if they did have an
overflow facility to go to the Ten Mile Creek, which is a standard procedure when there
is a receiving body of water that they enter into a license agreement with the receiving
body, they can't discharge pre-development flows to that They would have to enter into
a license agreement with that receiving body, at which point they would have to prove
that it was treated out to meet any EPA Clean Water Act regulations for the clean water.
I don't know if you wanted -- there is some other questions. I read Mr. Goins' letter
about wetlands and some groundwater issues. There was a geologist report from a
professional engineer that we reviewed prior to -- during the submittal of this that had
the water at over five and a half foot deep for the seasonal high is what his professional
recommendation was. He noted no wetlands on the site. It's possible that the water
that Mr. Goins was looking at was due to flood irrigation or just standing water of some
nature. I think that was everything in his letter that I saw that I could answer to and I
would stand for any questions.
Zaremba: Thank you. You answered mine.
Rohm: Would the applicant like to come forward, please?
Harris: First I'll say good morning. I'm Kevin Harris. Business address 1800 West
Overland Road in Boise, representing the owner John Fackelman. This is a great in-fill
project, you know, nice size lots for an in-fill and, you know, a pathway system
connecting up to Fuller Park and we agreed with all the conditions your staff has and I
would stand for any questions.
Rohm: Great presentation. Thank you. Any questions of the applicant? It doesn't
appear as we have any. Okay. But we do have quite a list here. Felix Dias. Jim
Beam? Maybe that's better. Is there anybody else that would like to testify on this
application? Please come forward, sir.
Goins: Mr. Chair, Commissioners, I'm Mark Goins, the writer of the letter. I live at 1267
Sour Creek. And my primary concern here is -- you know, I agree that Mr. Fackelman
has his property and has a right to develop it in a responsible way. My concern is as
somebody who's lived -- and I live a few feet --
Rohm: There should be a --
Goins: Oh, that's right. That's right. I live right here. Okay. And this cul-de-sac here
drains to the drainage pond here and it routinely will flood all the way from the cul-de-
sac more than the drainage pond can handle and, then, it has to flow out to the Ten Mile
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
February 16, 2006
Page 88 of95
Creek. I have talked with ACHD about this. I have talked with them many years ago
about stormwater issues, and even before we were either phase one or phase two, you
know, Boise is phase one, we are coming up on phase two permitting this summer and
they didn't seem to have a clear understanding of how to -- what to do to keep that
water from overflowing, because they didn't seem to want to regulate that and my
concern, based upon the history of what's happening over here is that what we have
here is not going to be adequate and as somebody who came from an area where
water quality became a major issue, the issue that happened that -- what happened with
that is once we had a few contamination situations into like Ten Mile Creek and such,
we had people coming into the affairs that we really didn't want showing up. Sierra Club
and all these other organizations. And so my point is that we take a proactive position
in being conservative about these kinds of issues, rather than with all the development
that's going in Meridian and that five years from now people from outside the area come
in and tell us how to run our business, because we were a little bit lax in running our
business today. And so I'm asking that this study be seriously considered as to whether
it's adequate. As they said, the water level is five years -- I mean the water level in the
height zone is only five feet down. Well, we have floods up here every -- every strong
rain we have we will have a flood there. In fact, we have had neighbors drain pools and
flood that, so -- in fact, the City of Meridian hasn't had the wherewithal to be able to do
anything about that, so that's why I bring this up over here. If we can't even control
what's already there -- and this is a very large drainage basin, it's what appears to be
the dry retention type, but it does have wetland vegetation growing in it, as I stated in
my letter. So, that's my major concern is that we need to be good stewards of the water
that we discharge at Ten Mile Creek, we discharge at the Boise River, and so I just want
to make sure that's well designed. Thank you.
Rohm: Thank you, sir. Mike, would you care to comment?
Cole: Mr. Chair, I couldn't really speak to the storm system that was installed with the
Rod's Parkside Creek development. I think that's the subdivision. I don't know why
that's flooding. I know that today that you take the square footage of the asphalt that's
being proposed in this subdivision and half of the grass for the lots, take a one inch acre
over that whole site and a hundred year storm event and that pond that -- their retention
pond that they are proposing has to maintain that entire event, plus they will have some
sort of seepage bed facility in the bottom of that to -- that takes the water in as it's
coming in, but it will be designed to hold the entire one hundred year storm event. So, I
don't -- I don't see any possibilities of the overflow to the Ten Mile Creek.
Rohm: I think it's suffice to say that the design of this retainage pond is not necessarily
going to match that of the one that was brought up by public testimony.
Goins: That's correct.
Rohm: Thank you, sir. Okay. Is there anybody else that would like to testify for this
application? Okay. That being said, I'd entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing.
t"
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
February 16,2006
Page 89 of95
Zaremba: Would the applicant care to respond to anything that's been said or --
Rohm: Okay. Any comments from --
Borup: I move we close the Public Hearing.
Rohm: Thank you.
Borup: If someone wants to second it.
Newton-Huckabay: Oh. Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we close the Public Hearing on AZ 06-001
and PP 06-001. All those in favor say aye. All those opposed same sign? Motion
carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borup: Mr. Chairman?
Rohm: Commissioner.
Borup: I move to recommend approval to City Council of file numbers AZ 06-001 and
PP 06-001 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 16th, 2006,
with the preliminary plat dated November 30th, 2005. End of motion.
Moe: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded that we forward onto City Council recommending
approval of AZ 06-001 and PP 06-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same
sign? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 20:
Public Hearing: CUP 05-061 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
12,680 square foot commercial building housing a Denny's Restaurant
and retail uses on 1.7 acres in the I-L zone by Mark Chang - 3155 East
Fairview Ave:
Rohm: You know what, we are going to do it. Mr. Strite has been very patiently waiting
for this last one, so at this point in time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on CUP 05-
061 and start with the staff report. Thank you folks for coming in.
Hood: Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. Hopefully, you remember,
just a little while ago, there was an application for a coffee shop with a drive-thru. This
site is directly to the east of that site and it is for a Denny's restaurant and future retail