HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommentsMERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING August 17, 2006 CUP O6-027
APPLICANT Winston Moore 9
ITEM NO.
REQUEST Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 52,000
sq. ft. retail building for G.I. Joe's - NWC of Eagle Rd. and Ustick Rd. (Centre Pointe Sub)
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
(vv-�
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
l/
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: Phone:
_4;�—I , e
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the city of Meridian.
\./
CITY OF It! v i
M
IyYl�taw
IDAHO�
y
FC'
'CR
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
/46 R UREV�u%EY SINCE To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by
MAYOR 1903 the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your
Tammy de Weerd comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 10, 2006
Keith Bird Transmittal Date: July 17, 2006 File No.: CUP 06-027
Joseph W. Borton
Charles M. Rountree Hearing Date: August 17, 2006
Shaun Wardle Request: Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit for a 52,000 sq. ft.
retail building for G.I. Joe's.
CITY DEPARTMENTS
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
898-5506 (City Attorney)
898-5503 (HR)
Fax 884-8723
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 / fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 / fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678/fax 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 / fax 895-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191/fax 884-0744
Water
2235 N.W.8th Street
888-5242/fax 884-1159
By: Winston Moore Company
Location of Property or Project: NWC of Eagle Rd. & Ustick Rd. (Centre
Pointe Sub. In Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, B.M.)
David Zaremba (no FP)
David Moe (no FP)
Wendy Newton-Huckabay (No FP)
Michael Rohm (No FP)
Keith Borup (No FP)
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Charlie Rountree, C/C
Joe Borton, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Shaun Wardle, C/C
Water Department
---Sewer Department
Sanitary Services(No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department / Rich Greene
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office(FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrig. District
Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,CUP)
Qwest (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only)
Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP)
Ada County Ass. Land Records
Meridian Development Corp.
Historical Pref.geV E
JUL 2 4 2006
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Ofnce
Your Concise Remarks:
A e it
CITY FALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK- FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING -FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE -FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
11 August 2006
Anna Canning
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Mer'01011
660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202
Meridian, ID 836422
RE: CUP 06-027/G.1. Joe's
Dear Anna:
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced application as it is out
of our district.
Sincerely,
Bill Henson
Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
C: File - Office/Shop
R-h IVE ,
2006
UTY OF MERIDIAN
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
All
j v t 2 7 2006
Cl'1 U W^z ID'L N
KING & ZONING
PL-
July 25, 2006
TO: WH Moore Co.
1940 Bonito #160
Meridian, ID 83642
SUBJECT: MCUP-06-027
GI Joes Retail
Eagle & Ustick
ACHD
�io�w,wvvt�`ucl�o }�itvti:co
John S. Franden, President
Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President
David Bivens, 2nd Vice President
Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner
.RECEIVED
J U L 2 3 2006
CITY OF MERIDIAN
On May 2, 2006, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on MPP-06-020 for Centerpointe.
The conditions and requirements also apply to MCUP-06-027.
• Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development Review
Department.
• A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a
building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for
information regarding impact fees.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177.
S' cerely,
�' /
'Joseph W. Kunz �
Planner Intern
Right -of -Way and Development Services
CC: Project File
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Larson Architects
210 Murray
Boise, ID 83714
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 2O8-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
July 25, 2006
TO:
WH Moore Co.
1940 Bonito #160
Meridian, ID 83642
ACHD
If
60 ... 54vti:w
SUBJECT: MCU P-06-025/MCU P-06-026
Retail Building
3445 N. Eagle
John S. Franden, President
Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President
David Bivens, 2nd Vice President
Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner
On May 2, 2006, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on MPP-06-020 for Centerpointe.
The conditions and requirements also apply to MCUP-06-025/MCUP-06-026.
• Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development Review
Department.
• A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a
building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for
information regarding impact fees.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177.
Sincerely,
Joseph W. Kunz
Planner Intern
Right -of -Way and Development Services
CC: Project File
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Larson Architects
210 Murray
Boise, ID 83714
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 2O8-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
Project/File:
Lead Agency:
Site address:
Staff Level
Approval:
Owner:
Representative:
CHD
G'ori,..N,r7XroC�e �.rv�s:rti
Centerpointe/M PP-06-020
City of Meridian
n/w/c Ustick & Eagle
May 2, 2006
Winston H. Moore
1940 Bonito #160
Meridian, ID 83642
Quadrant
1904 W. Overland Road
Boise, ID 83705
Staff Contact: Andrew Mentzer
Phone: 387-6170
E-mail: amentzer(abachd.ada.id.us
Tech Review: April 28, 2006
Application Information:
Acreage: 31.37
Current Zoning: C-G
Commercial Lots: 15
A. Findinqs of Fact
Existing Conditions
1
2
Right -of -Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
Site Information: The site is currently vacant; although improvements to the site are underway for
the Kohis store.
Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Vacant
C-G
South
Rural Residential
C-G
East
Rural Residential
C-G
West
Champion Park
R-8
1
3. Existing Roadway Improvements & Right -of -Way
Ustick Road is currently improved with 2 traffic lanes, dual left turn lanes, a
single right turn lane, a median, vertical curb, gutter, paved shoulders, and no
sidewalk abutting the site. Ustick Road currently has between 68 and 100-
feet of right-of-way abutting the site.
Eagle Road (and ITD roadway) is currently improved with 4 traffic lanes, 1
center turn lane (tapering to a left turn lane at the intersection of Ustick and
Eagle), paved shoulders, and no curb, gutter, or sidewalk abutting the site.
Eagle Road currently has 140-feet of right-of-way.
Existing Access: Access points on Ustick Road were installed with the widening project and
are located approximately 400-feet west of Eagle Road (right-in/right-out with
the newly constructed median), 600-feet west of Eagle Road (full access) and
1,100-feet west of Eagle Road (proposed signalized access at a public
street).
4. Site History:
Development Impacts
1. Trip Generation:
2. Impact Fees:
3
4
Traffic Impact Study:
Impacted Roadways:
ACHD has previously reviewed this site with the adjacent Kohis store
application: MCUP-05-048/MVAR-05-021
This development is estimated to generate 25,764 vehicle trips per day
based on a 600,000 square foot shopping center, according to the submitted
TIS.
There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee
ordinance that is in effect at that time.
A traffic impact study was submitted with the prior application for
Kohis Department store.
Roadway
Frontage
Functional
Traffic Count
Level of
Speed
Classification
Service*
Limit
Ustick Road
1,150'
Principal
8,084 West of
Better
40 MPH
Arterial
Eagle Rd. on
than "C"
11 /08/2005
Eagle Road
1,165'
50MPH
Principal
Exceeds
Arterial
43,156 North of
"E"
Ustick on
04/26/2005
*Acceptable level of service for a 2 lane principal arterial is "D" (14,000 VTD).
*Acceptable level of service for a 5-lane principal arterial is "D" (33,000 VTD).
5. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that
are currently in the Five Year Work Program. Ustick Road is slated to be widened to 5-lanes in the
future in the Capital Improvements Plan.
F4
B. Findings for Consideration
Traffic Impact Study
A traffic impact study was prepared by Gary Funkhouser of Stanley Consultants. The TIS is based
on a 600,000 square foot shopping center that this store will be a part of.
• The site is expected to generate 25,764 vehicle trips per day, with 618 AM peak hour trips
and 2250 PM peak hour trips.
• Site traffic distribution: 15% west of the site on Ustick Road, 20% east of the site on Ustick
Road, 35% south of the site on Eagle Road and 30% north of the site on Eagle Road.
• The Eagle Road/Ustick Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS D in2008.
• The Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS E in 2008.
• The Eagle Road/Pine Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS F in 2008.
• The Ustick Road/Cloverdale Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS E in 2008.
• The Ustick Road/Locust Grove Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS B in 2008.
• If access is allowed on Eagle Road, auxiliary lanes are warranted. (These should be
coordinated with ITD.)
2. Ustick Road
Right -of -Way Policy: District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure
72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot
concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes.
Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete
sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2).
Applicant Proposal: Curb and gutter are existing along Ustick Road. The applicant has proposed
to construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road abutting the site.
Staff Recommendation: The intersection of Ustick Road and Eagle Road is fully improved with the
exception of sidewalk. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot detached concrete
sidewalk to be no closer than 41-feet from the centerline of Ustick Road within the right-of-way.
3. Eagle Road (SH 55)
State Street (SH 44) is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD).
Applicant Proposal: There is 140-feet of existing ITD right-of-way for Eagle Road. The applicant
has proposed to construct sidewalk along Eagle Road abutting the site.
Street Section Policy: District policy 72-F3 requires arterial roadways to be constructed as a 72-
foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalk
within 96-feet of right-of-way with parking prohibited on both sides of the roadway.
Applicant Proposal: There is 140-feet of existing ITD right-of-way for Eagle Road. The applicant
has proposed to construct sidewalk along Eagle Road abutting the site.
Staff Recommendation: Eagle Road is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation
Department, The City of Meridian, the applicant and ITD should work together to determine if
additional right-of-way or improvements are necessary on Eagle Road (SH-55). Access points
should be approved in accordance with the Eagle Road Corridor Study.
3
4. Driveways/Access Points
Offset Policy: District policy 72-F4 (1) requires driveways located on arterial roadways near a
signalized intersection to be located a minimum of 440-feet from the signalized intersection for a
full -access driveway and a minimum of 220-feet from the signalized intersection for a right-in/right-
out only driveway.
Successive Driveway Policy: District policy 72-175, requires driveways located on collector or
arterial roadways with a speed limit of 40 to align or offset a minimum of 185-feet from any existing
or proposed driveway; N/A for Eagle Road.
Width Policy: District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over
1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as
curb -cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be
required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to
gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant
should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the
edge of pavement of the roadway.
Applicant Proposal
The access points on Ustick Road were installed with the widening project and are located
approximately 400-feet west of Eagle Road (right-in/right-out with the newly constructed median),
600-feet west of Eagle Road (full access) and 1,100-feet west of Eagle Road (proposed signalized
access at a public street).
All driveway locations meet District policy for location, except for the western signalized access that
is located less than '/4 mile west of Eagle Road. ACHD generally approves traffic signals at no less
than quarter -mile spacing, but prefers third and half -mile spacing. Staff recommends approval of
the signal at the west property line under the following conditions:
a. That no signals be allowed on Eagle Road to this site. The applicant's original
proposal included a signal at the'/4 mile on Eagle Road. ITD's Eagle Road Study
allows for signals at the %2 mile. On this segment of Eagle Road, Wainwright Drive
will eventually be signalized at the''/2 mile. The City of Meridian's newly adopted
Unified Development Code also prohibits access to the state highways except at
the %2 mile. ACHD staff is recommending approval of this signal to "spare" Eagle
Road of the addition of another signal not located at the %2 mile. The addition of a
signal on Eagle Road, not located at the %2 mile, will further complicate signal
timing and congestion on the state highway.
b. That a north -south public roadway be constructed to eventually tie into Wainwright
Drive. ACHD has purchased a small piece of property on the south side of
Wainwright Drive for a future north -south collector -type roadway that will tie into the
proposed signal at Ustick Road. This future connection will provide signalized
Eagle Road access to this site and surrounding properties, and will provide
secondary connections for parcels that currently have access only off of Eagle
Road. The additional traffic on the new roadway will help support the need for the
Ustick Road signal.
c. That all costs associated with the signal be borne by the applicant, except for
materials that will be donated by ACHD. Staff recommends donation of the
hardware because the signal will provide benefit to surrounding property owners.
4
Although the signal won't be warranted at the time that the major retailer opens, the
applicant is seeking approval to have the signal operational prior to the opening of the main
tenant. Staff recommends approval of this proposal, again, under the conditions outlined
above.
5. North -South Public Roadway
The applicant should construct a north -south public roadway as a 40-foot street section within 54-
feet of right-of-way with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on both sides of the
roadway. Construct a temporary turnaround at the end of the roadway and install a sign that states
"THIS ROADWAY WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The alignment of the roadway, as
shown on the plans is not approved in a straight north -south alignment. In the area noted as
"Phase 3", the roadway will need to shift to the east to align with the parcel owned by ACHD.
ACHD has purchased a piece of property just south of Wainwright Drive to preserve a north -south
corridor for a future connection. As the properties north of this site develop, the roadway will be
constructed, and extended to Wainwright Drive, where a signal is planned for the future because
this roadway is located at the % mile. The applicant is required to construct the roadway abutting
this parcel only with this application and should continue to work with ACHD staff on the alignment
as it continues north through the future phases.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
Construct Sadie Creek Avenue (north -south public roadway) as a 40-foot street section with vertical
curb, gutter, and 5-foot concrete sidewalks within 54-feet of right-of-way. Construct a temporary
turnaround at the end of the roadway and install a sign that states "THIS ROADWAY WILL BE
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
2. Construct a 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk within the right-of-way abutting the site to be no
closer than 41-feet from the centerline of Ustick Road.
3. Utilize the existing right-in/right-out only access point intersecting Ustick Road approximately 400-
feet west of Eagle Road. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site).
4. Utilize the existing full -access point intersecting Ustick Road approximately 600-feet west Eagle
Road. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site. The site's existing access
point intersecting Ustick Road approximately 400-feet west of Eagle Road is approved as a curb
return to be no more than 36-feet wide, paved its full width at least 30-feet into the site (right-
in/right-out only).
5. Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the SH 55 frontage. Submit to the District
a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of
a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact the District III Traffic
Engineer at 334-8340.
6. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
5
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or
right-of-way.
3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
9. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
10. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at
the time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
A
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Appeal Guidelines
4. Development Process Checklist
7
LESLIE YfA
1 u
I
jju
fill I�mI�I��II'�9�
esit
Iq�I
0
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an
error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the
Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from
the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer
to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone
number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written
summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law
relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The
Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the
provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission
hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the
appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to
be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS
Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the
notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1)
week prior to the hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
10
Development Process Checklist
®Submit a development application to a City or to the County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
❑Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time
❑Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part
of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also
apply to this development application.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating
the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
❑Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
❑The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports.
❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter:
• The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required
by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way,
including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Zone)
❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by
Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
❑ Working in the ACHD Right -of -Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application"
to ACHD Construction — Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are
placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
❑ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre -Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan
Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction — Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage
Division.
❑ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre -Con being
scheduled.
❑ Final Approval from Development Services
ACHD Construction — Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling a Pre -Con.
This application requires Commission action and is on the consent agenda for November 9, 2005. Tech
Review for this item was held with the applicant on October 28, 2005. Please refer to the attachment for
11