HomeMy WebLinkAboutFrank, Jerald AZ 02-012July 8, 2002
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Jerald S. Frank
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO. 7
AZ 02--012
REQUEST PubJJc Hearing: Request for Annexation and Zoning of 2.02 acres from RUT to R-4
zones - 2310 South Locust Grove Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATrORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
SANITARY SERVICE:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
See Atfached Comments
No Comment
No Comment
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
Date: Phone:
Maleridis presented at public meet'rags shall become properly of Ihe City of Meridian.
MAYOR
Robert D. Corfie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tarmny doWeerd
Keith Bird
Chegie McCandless
William L.M. Nary
MEMORANDUM:
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 388-4433- FAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
To:
From:
Re:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
David McKinnon, Planner II ~_ ~
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Eng~Fe'ering Teeh
Jerald S. Frank
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 898-5500 ' Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 · FAX 888-6854
July 5, 2002
RECEIVED
¢UL -' 5 2002
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CI FRK OFFICE
Annexation and Zoning of 2.2 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4
(Residential), by Jerald S. Frank (File No. AZ-02-O12).
We have reviewed the above-referenced submittal and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Jerald S. Frank, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning of 2.2 acres of land
located at 2310 S. Locust Grove Road. The annexation is being processed in response to a
request for municipal sewer and water service at this locatiorr The existing drainfield for the
septic tank at this location had failed. City Council approved this hookup on October 3, 2000.
The applicant has paid the Planning & Zoning Department the appropriate fee, and staff prepared
this application. Thc reference to a failed water system in the application is an error.
LOCATION
The property, 2310 S. Locust Grove Road, is located
approximately 150 feet north of E. Doberman Drive.
on the east side of Locust Grove,
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Rural residential, zoned R-I (County)
South: Raven Hill and Los Aiamitos Subdivisions,zoned R-4
East: Raven Hill Subdivision, zoned R-4
West: Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R-4
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required '~o review the particular facts and circumstances
of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall fred adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
AZ-02-012 Gerald Frank AZ
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
July 5, 2002
Page 2
The following is the list of standatrds found in Section 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designation (R-4) and land use (single-family
residential) are harmonious with and accordance with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and Generalized Land Use Map (1993), which designates the land to be
"Single-family Residential".
Be
Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The majority of the surrounding properties are developed as single-family
residential subdivisions.
Ce
Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed R-4 zoning will not change the existing or intended
character of the area.
De
Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine
whether or not the proposed R4 zoning will be disturbing or hazardous to the
existing or future neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed R-4 zone will result in any future re-
development that will be hazardous or dist~ing to future or existing neighbors.
Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be annexed can be served adequately by all
essential public facilities and services.
AZ-~2-~I2 ~ Frank .AZ
Planniag & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
July 5, 2002
Page 3
Ge
Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that tbere will not be additional requirements at public cost and that the
annexation and zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic
welfare.
Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed single-family residential use will not create excessive
traffic, noise or other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare
of the surrounding area.
Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the annexation and development of the property should not create
any additional interference with the existing traffic on Locust Grove. Any future
development will require coordination with the Ada County Highway District to
ensure no conflicts with nearby driveways/roadways exist or are created.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds that no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or
damaged by approving the annexation and rezone.
Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the annexation of this enclave property would be in the best
interest of the City and was a requirement to hook up to City services.
ANEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city
limits
AZ-02-012 C, erald Frank .AZ
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
5, 2002
Page 4
Domestic water service to this site shah be via an existing main adjacem to the site in S.
Locust Grove Road. Sanitary sewer service is currently being provided by the City of
Meridian's system.
3. The requested zoning of R-4 is compatible with City Comprehen~sive Plan.
4. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area. Essemial City services are
available to the subject property.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed f~om their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be
used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation and rezone.
AZ-02-012 Gerald Frank .AZ
Dep ent
Joseph Silva
Deputy Chief
Meridian Fire Department
540 E. Franklin Rd.
Meridian, Id 83642
(208) 888-1234
FaX:
July 2, 2002
TO: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission i/r)
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Fire Chief, Fire Preventio
SUBJECT: Frank Annexation 2310 South Locust Grove R'8.
File: AZ 02-012
RECEIVED
JUL 0 2 2002
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
The:following will be the requirements to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the project:
1. ~: ~t a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute be available to service the entire project. Fire
~h.¥drantS shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix III-A
:
~:::2. ::Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
3. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon acceptance of the water system
bYthe City of Meridian for water quality.
:,
:::!41 Final Approval of Fire hydrant locations shall by the Fire Department.
5. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius.
6. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation per
1103.2.4 of the Uniform Fire Code.
7 The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone. Achievement of this goal is
subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a
request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities
that are located withinl.5 miles from a given location.
8. Provide an approved mm around for any road greater than 150' long.
Ada County Highway District
David E. Wynkoop, President
Dave Bivens, 1st Vice President
Judy Peavey-Derr, 2nd Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
To:
Jerald S~ Frank
2787 W. Balata Court
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject:
MAZ02-012
Annexation & Rezone
2310 S. Locust Grove Road
May28,2002
318 East 37th Street
Garden City ID 83714-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us
RECEIVED
MAY3 I 2002
C.ity of Meridian
C~tY Clerk Office
On May 28, 2002, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the
above referenced project. The attached staff level report lists Site Specific Requirements,
conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required when a development
application is submitted.
If you have any questions, Please feel free to contact staff at 387-6174.
Right-of-way & Development Services
Planning Division
CC:
Planning & Development Chron/project file
City of Meridian
Construction Services
Drainage
Utilities
Ada County Highway District
Right-of- Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level as of May 28, 2002.
Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on May 24, 2002. Please refer to Attachment 2 for
appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Craig Hood, 387-6174, chood@achd, ada. id. us C,, ~
File Number(s): MAZ02-012, Annexation & Rezone
Site address:
Owner/Applicant:
2310 S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian
Jerald S. Frank
2787 W. Balata Court
Meridian, ID 83642
Application Information 'r~
The applicant is requesting approval from the City of Meridian to annex and rezone 2.02-acres from R1/RU
to R-4. This site is located on the east side of Locust Grove Road, between Overland Road and Victory Roa~
in Section 20, Township 3N, Range 1E.
Acreage: 2.02-acres
Current Zoning: R1/RUT
Proposed Zoning: R-4
Vicinity Map
$1~E
111 II Jill I \ II II
Am
o
Findings of Fact
Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 80 additional vehicle trips per day (10
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
Site Information: There is currently a single-family home on this site that is occupied.
Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: single-family residence on 2-acres
b. South: single-family residence on 1-acre
c. East: single-family homes across canal (Raven Hill Sub)
d. West: single-family homes (Sportsman Point Sub #4)
Impacted Roadway(s)
Locust Grove Road:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Speed limit:
Nearest intersection:
160-feet
Section Line Road
3,648 south of Overland Road on 5/2/00
LOS C or better
35 MPH
Overland Road, a two-way stop intersection (Locust Grove
stops)
Overland Road:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Nearest intersection:
None
Minor Arterial
10,512 west of Locust Grove Road on 5/2/00
LOS D
Locust Grove Road, a two-way stop intersection (Locust Grove
stops)
Victory Road:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Nearest intersection:
None
Minor Arterial
3,321 west of Eagle Road on 2/2/00
LOS C or better
Eagle Road, a four-way stop intersection
Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
There is currently no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting this site. Locust Grove Road is currently
improved approximately 24-feet wide with two lanes (no center turn lane). There is curb, gutter and
sidewalk across Locust Grove Road along the frontage of Sportsman Point Subdivision.
Existing Right-of-Way
There is approximately 60-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) for Locust Grove Road.
2
10.
aw
Existing Access to the Site
There is currently one 12-foot wide unpaved driveway into the site located near the southern property
line.
Site History
This site has not been reviewed by ACHD in the recent past.
Five Year Work Program
Overland Road from Eagle Road to Meridian Road is currently in the Five Year Work Program for
curb, gutter sidewalk, pavement widening and signal installation at Locust Grove Road in 2003.
Findings for Consideration
Right-of-Way
District policy 7204.8 requires 90-feet of right-of-way (45-feet from centerline) for Section Line Roads
within a City's urban service planning area. The applicant should be required to dedicate additional
right-of-way for Locust Grove Road.
Sidewalk
District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all section line roads within an
area of city impact (7203.4.1). The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide (minimum)
detached sidewalk with any application for development.
Access Points
District policy 7201.1.5 restricts direct lot access to section line roads. District policy further states that
the developer shall try to use combined access points. In addition, District policy F2-F5, requires
driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 35 to align or offset a
minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Improvements
District Policy 7207.9.3 restricts residential driveways to a maximum width of 20-feet. Graveled
driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the
roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the
ddveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Locust Grove
Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
Stub Streets
In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be
required upon review of a future application for this site.
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
If the rezone is approved and the District receives a development proposal, the District
intends to provide the following requirements, in addition to any additional
requirements that may apply upon District review of future development, to the City of
Meridian:
Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by
means of a warranty deed. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be
completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACriD
Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs
3
Dw
first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested
material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an
addition to existing ACriD right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee
administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with ACriD Ordinance #195.
Construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road located 2-feet within the
new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. If the
sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk. The District will
require a license agreement for the landscape strip with the detached sidewalk. An agreement must
be approved prior to scheduling the final plat for signature. Please contact the Right-of-Way Division
at 387-3271 for guidelines.
Pave any approved driveways to their full required width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the
edge of pavement of Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the
existing roadway edge.
Ddveway and proposed street locations will be subject to further review with any future development
application(s) for this site.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
Replace any existing damage curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway Distdct Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing
utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The
applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to
breaking ground within ACriD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-
4
6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of
construction.
o
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
10.
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Appeal Guidelines
5
1.
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a wdtten notice of appeal with the Secretary
of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a
written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
Notice of Headng: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week pdor to the
hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the headng, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
Appeal Guidelines
6
RECEIVED
MAY 2 2 2002
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
May 17, 2002
Will Berg, City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meri~dia~_~ ~ 83 642~
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampo 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Re: AZ 02-012 Annexation and Zoning from RUT to R-4 / Jerald S. Frank
Dear Commissioners:
The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above-mentioned
application.
Sincerely,
~il~o~n'~s'~'~ Superintendent
· s , Asst. Water
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
BH: dln
C~
File- Shop
File - Office
Watgr Superintendent
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
CENTRAL
DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary / Final / Short Plat
1~2.
[~3.
[~4.
We have No Objections to this Proposal.
RECErvj D
Return to:
[~Boise
[~ Eagle
[~ Garden City
,~Vleddian
I Kuna
I ACZ
[~Star
We recommend Denial of this Proposal. CITY OF MERIDIAN
Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provide~ll~r~cO'l~l~t~'7~ this Proposal.
We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of:
(~ high seasonal ground water ~ waste flow characteristics
I~ or bedrock from original grade ~ other
~ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
~ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
[~ central sewage I~ community sewage system (~ community water well
[~ intedm sewage [~ central water
[~ individual sewage I~ individual water
The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
I~ central sewage I~l community sewage system i-I community water
[~ sewage dry lines [~ central water
Run-Off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
~ 11..This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
~ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
[~13.
We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
[~ food establishment I~'swimming pools or spas
[~ beverage establishment r-i grocery store
I-I child care center
Date: ~//7/~ Z...
Reviewed By:
Review Sheet
COHO 9/00 Ikc
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 · Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 · Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884,-5533 · Fax 888-685.*
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: July 5, 2002
Transmittal Date: May 14, 2002 Hearing Date: July 11, 2002
File No.: AZ 02-012
Request: Request for annexation and zoning of 2.02 acres from RUT to R-4
By: Jerald S. Frank
Location of Property or Project:
2310 South Locust Grove Road
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keven Shreeve, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
AZ-2? FP-24 PP/PFP-27 VARNAC- 20 CUP-28
RECEIVED
MAY 1 7 2002
C.ity of Meridian
C~ty Clerk Office
Your Concise Remarks:
Meddian School Distdct (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway Distdct
Community Planning Assoc.
Central Distdct Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. Distdct
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only)
U.S. West (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/I=P only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/I::'P only)
Idaho Transportation Department (NoFP)
Ada County (AZ. only)
~ HAY 15 2002 ~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
W~TEWATER DEPT.
MRY-24-~002 11:54~ FROrq:Sanitar~ Services,
Robin D
CITY COUNCIl, MF~IB£R$
William L. M. N~'y
Kc,th Bird
Tammy deWca'd
Cherie M¢C~ndless
I ~08-888-5052 TO: 8884~18
A Good Place to Liv~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 836,12
(208) $$8-~113 · F,,~ (208) 887.48
City Cl~rk Offi¢= F~.~ (208) 088-d21~
P:7/8
LEGAL OEP), RTM ENT
(2(~) 2S~1.2400 · F=3 288-2~01
PUBUC wOR KS
(20~) ~98-55~, FaA ~87.1~97
BUILDING DEPA R~I~NT
(~8) ~87-2~1 · FaR 887-1
P~NNINO AND ZONING
(:0~) ~8~.~5)3 · Fax
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Wi, Berg. City Clerk, by: July 5, 2002
Transmittal Date: May 14, 2002 Hearing Date: July 11, 2002
File No.: AZ 02-012
Request: Request for annexation and zoning of 2.02 acres from RUT to R-4
By: Jerald $. Frank
Location of Property or Project:
2310 South Locust Grove Road
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAI~ VAC,
Jem/Centem, PFZ (No VAn, VAC,
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, V,4C, FP)
Keven Shreeve, PIZ eno VAR, WC. FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (mo v,,~. v/~c,
Robert Corrie, Mayor
BUI Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, Cftc
Water Department
Sewer Department
$anita~/Service (No v. aJ~, wc,
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Merldlan School District (No
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP o~ly)
Ada County Hlghway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho PO1N~r Co. (FP/PP
U.S. West. (FP/PR only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PPonly)
Idaho Transportation Department ~
Ada County (~on~,)
Your Concise Remarlm:/1
MAYOR
Robert D, Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William L. M. Nary
Keith Bird
Tammy deWcerd
Cherie McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 · Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Ot'fic¢ Fax (208) 888-.t218
LEG A L DER& RTM ENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 · Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 88'7- ! 297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533 · Fax 888-685.t
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meddian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: July 5, 2002
Transmittal Date: May 14, 2002 Headng Date: July 11, 2002
File No.: AZ 02-012
Request: Request for annexation and zoning of 2.02 acres from RUT to R-4
By: Jerald S. Frank
Location of Property or Project:
2310 South Locust Grove Road
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, V,4C, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC,
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keven Shreeve, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, V,~C, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Chede McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC,
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
AZ-27 PP-24 PP/PFP-27 V,Nt/V~- 20 CU~-26
Your Concise Remarks:
,,-/ -/--.4,
Meddian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central Distdct Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only)
U.S. West (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (AZtonly)
RECEIVED
HAY 1720O2
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
3u! 03 02 U/:O~
Meridian Parks & Recreation
Memo
To: Planning & Zonin9 Commission RECEI D
From: Tom Kuntz JUL 3 20112
Date: June 25, 2002
CC: City Clerk & Planning & Zoning Staff Clerk Office
RE: AZ 02-012 - Request for Annexation and Zoning
The Parks and Recreation staff has received and reviewed the above-proposed
project and have no recommendations to add at this time.
· Page 1
JUL 03 ' 02 0~: 39
208 898 5501
PAGE. 02
Sent By: Uenlalan P&Z; 888 §854; Jul-8-02 4:24PM; Page 1/1
To: City Cierk At: 8884218
JUL 0 8
TO Whom It May Concern: t",[r¥ t)'l,'
IPI.~N.NkNG & ZONING
~ ~esid~t of me Hokum As~ciaaon of ~ven Hia Su~i~sion ~d a
h0meo~ ~t ~11 ~ ~r~ly ~c~ by ~e ~ge in zon~g I ~ in opposition of
~ pro~ z~ c~ge. I f~ ~at ~e ch~ge in ~g ~1 ~ow f~ ~c~
p0p~fion ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ it ~ not ~d. ~e ~a h~ ~n d~cd ~ a
r~si~fi~ ~ea ~d ~ a r~t ~meo~s Mve cho~ ~ live h~e. It wo~d
~appmciat~ by ~e c~t re~&n~ to ~ge ~e popalsfion density. ~e c~t
h0~~ p~~ lind ~ ~e ~s~p~on ~t it ~ in ~ ~a where ~ning
did not ~t mom ~ ~si~nfi~ ~. ~e pm~d c~ wo~d ~low
c~aaon of d~l~ ~t ~ula m my opinion ~ve ~ po~nti8 m ~ ~ e~ sore
~b~ ~ ~e ~y ~g i~s of~g a g~g~sious sch~l m close to
nci~~. It wo~d ~m ~n~bu~ a ~gafi~ &ctor ~ ~e ~ p~y v~s. As a
~t I ~ op~ ~ ~~ f~ ~on ~ ~~ ~ 2310 S. Loc~t
~V~.
~y qu~fiom or co--eats ~ ~ly ~ ~ ~d by ~one ~ me m 353-1820
s,=.,,, RECEIVED
~n Ho~s
JUL 8 2002
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OF'FICF
JUL 88 '02 16:14 888 ~854 PAGE.O1
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE
11-Jul-02
PROJECT NUMBER
AZ 02-012
PROJECT NAME
Jerald S. Frank
NAME
FOR
AGAINST
CITY OF MERIDIAN