HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket from Steve Siddoway
Pagelofl
Tara Green
From: Steve Siddoway
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:43 PM
To: Jessica Johnson; Tara Green; Will Berg
Cc: Tammy de Weerd; Peggy Gardner
Subject: North Meridian Area Plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Green
Attachments: SECTION D-aoci (CounciQ.doc; Section E-Transportation Policies (Council).doc; SECTION
F-circ map-cover (Council).doc; AutoCirculationMap_6.jpg; Section G-Land Use Policies
(CounciQ.doc; SECTION H-Mure land use map-cover (Council).doc; future land use map-
revised.pdt; Intro - Sections A~C (Council).doc
Attached are the updated documents for the NMAP hearing for inclusion with Council's packet for next Tuesday. I
have asked Barb to upload them to our website for public review. I will also forward them to the City of Nampa,
as requested by the Mayor's office.
Steve
.-.--..-,.--...
From: Steve Siddoway
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:37 PM
To: 'Barb Shiffer (shifferb@meridiancity.org)'
te: Anna Canning
Subject: Website
Barb,
The updated documents for NMAP are done (attached). Please upload these to our website for public review as
soon as possible. Some may already be on the website, but changes have been made to Section E, Section G,
and the two maps.
Thank you,
Steve
3/3/2006
~
'C~
NORTH MERIDIAN AREA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICATION CONTENT
January 2006
(for January 17th City Council public hearing)
ApPLICATION ORGANIZATION & CONTENT
This Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) application proposes to amend the 2002 City of
Meridian Comprehensive Plan (hereafter referred to as "Plan"), adopted on August 6, 2002
and amended by Resolutions 03-401 and 04-454. The proposed changes affect both the text
and map components ofthe Plan (as further defined below). The application contains the
following sections:
A. Application Overview (provides background, purpose and assumption information)
B. CPA Application Questions (answers the questions required in the City of Meridian
application form)
C. Idaho Code (briefly reviews Idaho Code requirements for changes to Area of City
Impact boundaries)
D. Proposed Area of City Impact Map (graphically depicts the existing and proposed
boundaries for the Meridian Area of City Impact)
E. Transportation/Infrastructure Text Changes (proposed amendments to Chapter VI of
the Plan)
F. Circulation Plan Map (a new figure proposed to be inserted into Chapter VI)
G. Land Use Text Changes (proposed amendments to Chapter VII of the Plan)
H. Amended Future Land Use Map (a figure proposed to replace existing Figure VII-2 in
Chapter VII)
Each element listed above is inter-related with the subsequent element and the application
is most effectively read and understood in that manner.
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 1
"-."
A. Application Overview
1. Background
The genesis ofthis CPA application was in 2001, preceding even the approval of the
current 2002 plan. While Meridian's overall growth rate in the 1990's was unprecedented
(approx. 230% increase in population between the 1990 and 2000 V.S. Census), only a
small fraction of that growth occurred north of V stick Road. Over 90% of subdivisions
created in the 1990's were located south of Us tick Road (mostly west of Meridian Road).
However, when the White Trunk Sewer project began construction in 2001 (extending
from Ten Mile Road to Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan), it would
eventually open up over three square miles of largely undeveloped county land to urban
scale development. This precipitated the acquisition of large land holdings by developers
and subsequent annexation and subdivision applications to the city. With some concern
about the provision and readiness of public infrastructure to serve this area, several
residential land developers hired Wardle and Associates, a local land planning finn, to
facilitate a broad-based planning effort that included mostly public agencies and technical
staff. This effort came to be known as the North Meridian Area Plan (NMAP).
After more than 18 months of workshops, interviews, and planning, the NMAP was
submitted to the city as a CPA application. A public hearing was held before the Planning
& Zoning Commission in May 2003. While there was strong, broad support for the plan's
vision and principles, staff believed the administrative challenges associated with the plan
as submitted would impede effective and efficient implementation. For example, the plan
was written as a stand alone document with no cross-references to the adopted Plan. With
the consent of Wardle and Associates, the application was withdrawn. No fonnal
recommendation was made by the Planning & Zoning Commission to the City Council,
but they did direct staff to incorporate many of the NMAP goals and policies in any future
CP A application.
During her 2004 mayoral campaign, Mayor de Weerd made the NMAP a high priority,
calling for that plan to be revived and this time lead and initiated by the City of Meridian.
The Planning Department staffbegan meeting with various stakeholders to fonnulate a
timeline and method to more directly involve private property owners in the area. The
mayor and City Council also directed staff to explore an expansion to the Area of City
Impact (AOCI) boundary to the north and west. In May 2005, an open house was held at
Sawtooth Middle School to present the general purpose of the plan and to receive
feedback from the public on land use and transportation concerns and ideas. Below is a
simple comparison of the private and public plans:
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 2
--~
Applicant
GeographiC Area
CP A ublic
City of Meridian
16 square miles
(a rox.)
Proposed expansion
No
10 square miles
Area of City Impact
Proposed Zoning
Ordinance Amendment?
Transportation Funding
a Part of A lication?
No change
Yes
Yes
No
Relationsbi to Communities in Motion and Blue rint for Good Growth: Two regional
land use and transportation planning efforts are underway at the time this CPA application
is being submitted. Communities in Motion (CIM) is the Regional Long-Tenn
Transportation Plan of the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho
(COMPASS) and Blueprint for Good Growth (BGG) is a 2025 land use and public
infrastructure plan being co-sponsored by the Ada County Highway District, Ada County
and the six cities of Ada County. It is not the intent of the City of Meridian to supercede
or compromise either the process or recommendations of these regional plans. In fact, the
city has been an active participant in both the elM and BOO steering teams and has
contributed funding to both plans. So, given the long-term nature of those plans and that
neither one is intended to provide area-specific detail, Meridian believes this application
will compliment and honor the outcome of both the CIM and BGG efforts.
Consultants for Plan: Wlùle the Planning Department staff is preparing most of the
content for this application, we have contracted with two private finns to provide
additional, supporting documentation. The first is Thornton Oliver Keller, a real estate
brokerage, who is conducting a market analysis ofthe North Meridian Area to help
detennine the absorption rate and demand for office, retail and industrial uses. Results of
this study are expected to help guide the city in designating areas for new non-residential
uses. The second contract is with Washington Group International, an engineering and
construction finn located in Boise, Idaho. They are updating the 2001 Traffic Impact
Studyofthe 12-square mile area in North Meridian, focusing particularly on 5-year
estimates of intersection improvements needed to accommodate new traffic generated in
the area. The Executive Summary ofthis report is shown in Section I ofthis application.
2. Application purpose
In summary, this CPA application includes three general requests:
a) expand the AOCI boundary nortb of Cbinden Boulevard (to the rim) and
west of McDennott Road (to Can Ada Road);
b) designate new land uses and policies within the proposed expansion areas
and amend existing land uses in the current AOCI; and'
c) create a new circulation IDa and associated trans ortation olicies to address
multi-modal fonns of travel in North Meridian.
Page 3
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
-
In addition to the obvious intent to amend the Plan, this application is also being prepared
as part ofthe City of Meridian's application to Ada County to expand the AOCI
boundary. Ada County requires cities to provide a detailed map with land use designations
for any new land being added to the AOCI. If approved by City Council, the Future Land
Use Map associated with this application would be sent to Ada County to fulfill that
requirement of renegotiating the AOCI boundary.
3. Key Assumptions
Below are some of the key land use and transportation assumptions that staff referenced in
developing the CPA application. These assumptions were presented and discussed in
special workshops with the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. The
majority of the assumptions are similar to and/or derived from assumptions found in the
Foundation Report section of the private NMAP application (withdrawn in 2003).
Land Use
>- All existing zoning, preliminary plats and planned developments will remain
unchanged.
>- The plan will give detail to the work in process for the CIM and BGG plans
>- The City of Meridian desires to manage growth and annex new land only when it is
clearly demonstrated that all urban services will meet targeted levels.
>- A mix of services and job types will be available in North Meridian and policies will
encourage mixed-use neighborhoods.
>- Overall density of housing will be at least 3 - 3.5 dwelling units/acre.
>- Lower density housing (less than 2 dwelling units/acre) is expected north of Chinden
Boulevard along the rim.
>- Higher density housing is desired close to service centers and along transit corridors.
>- The existing mid-mile Neighborhood Centers shown in sections where commercial
annexations have been approved at the comers will be removed.
>- A majority of residents in the two new areas of expansion (north of Chinden
Boulevard and west of McDermott Road) support the AOCI change.
Transportation
>- SH20-26/Chinden will be a limited access highway that retains a speed of at least 45
mph.
>- Future SHl6/Emmett Highway extension will generally align with McDermott Rd.
and will dramatically affect land uses.
>- ITD won't know the final alignment ofSH16 for at least 2 Y2 - 3 years. Until the
alignment is known, it is in the best interest of the City of Meridian to protect this
corridor from urban growth.
>- A new limited access highway (SHI6) will create an incredible opportunity and a
physical barrier for the community.
>- A grade separated interchange is anticipated at SHI6/SH20-26 and at SHl6/Ustick
Road (wherever the SHl6 alignment ends up being located).
>- Multi-modal centers will be encouraged near these interchanges.
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 4
'y Future bus routes will be focused on the arterial grid and will primarily serve
neighborhood centers
'y Ultimately, all arterial intersections and many half-mile intersections will be
signalized
B. CPA Application Questions (from Meridian's CPA application form)
1. Specific defmition of the change requested.
The changes proposed in this application fall into three broad areas:
a) Expand the AGCl boundary north of Chinden Boulevard (to the rim) and west of
McDermott Road (to Can Ada Road).
The City of Meridian is proposing to expand its AOCI boundary in two different areas
- one is north of Chinden Boulevard/SH20-26 (hereafter referred to as SH20-26) and
the other is south of SH20-26. The area north of SH20-26 begins at the northwest
comer ofN. Linder Road and SH20-26 and extends west to McDermott Road. The
north boundary is currently proposed to be the centerline of the Phyllis Canal or the
nearest logical property boundary to the canal. Initial discussions have taken place
with the City of Eagle regarding Almaden Subdivision, approximately 1,4 mile north of
SH20-26, and an II-acre parcel abutting the canal. This area is currently not a part of
Meridian's AOCI application.
This area is approximately 825 acres in size and includes 135 recorded properties. The
land falls within Township 4N, Range IE and includes portions of Sections 21, 22 and
23. Several large parcel owners have already approached the city requesting to be
added to Meridian's AOCI. Noteworthy land uses in this area include the Spurwing
Golf Course, Jaker's Wholesale Nursery and other estate-type housing.
In 2004, the Public Works Department contracted with JUB Engineers to complete a
sanitary sewer study ofthis area (including the Almaden Subdivision area). That study
demonstrated the City of Meridian is capable of providing sewer service to this area,
assuming a new lift station is built north of SH20-26. Meridian's domestic water
service can also be extended to this area (although no fonnal study was done). This
area is already within the boundaries of the Meridian Rural/City Fire Department and
Joint School District No.2. One new elementary school is anticipated in this area
north of SH20-26.
Finally, at the May open house, a property owner located between the Phyllis Canal
and the Boise River expressed interest in being added to Meridian's AOCL Prior to
this meeting, the city had not considered expanding north of the rim. The attached
Future Land Use Map does not reflect this area. However, staff recommends the
Commission and City Council review this request as part of the public hearing
process. There is approximately 1,400 acres of land between the rim and the river and
between McDennott Road and Linder Road. The subject property is approximately
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 5
390 acres, or 28% of the total "below rim" area. Staff prepared a brief analysis of this
area and it is available upon request.
The area south ofSH20-26 begins at the southwest comer of McDermott Road and
SH20-26 and extends south and west to the comer of CanAda Road and U stick Road.
It includes Sections 29 - 32 (four square miles) within Township 4N, Range IE.
Existing agricultural/rural type uses dominate this area and include churches, a tree
nursery, dairy operations and a small cemetery.
The Public Works Department is currently under contract with ruB Engineers to
complete a sanitary sewer study of this four mile area. The study is expected to be
complete by December 2005. Initial findings show that Meridian should be able to
serve the area, taking into account treatment plant and potential lift station
improvements. Initial findings also show that Meridian should be able to provide
domestic water service. New well sites are proposed in each square mile, although the
need for these is yet to be determined. This area is currently within the boundaries of
the Star Fire District. However, the City of Star is not currently seeking any AOCI
expansion south of SH20-26 and, if annexed, it is anticipated the Meridian Fire
Department would service the area. One new elementary school and one fire
substation are expected for this area.
b) Designate new land uses and policies within the proposed expansion areas and amend
existing land uses in the current AOCI.
The Amended Future Land Use Map (see attached) shows new land use designations
for all properties in both of the areas described above. This map also reflects the new
zoning districts and land uses in the North Meridian Area approved by City Council to
date since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Many of the new land use policies are
taken directly from the Wardle and Associates NMAP application. We've also'added a
new section pertaining to policies specific to the SHl6 preservation corridor.
c) Create a new circulation map and associated transportation policies to address multi-
modal forms of travel in North Meridian.
Figure VI-8 in Chapter VI ofthe current Plan is a "Future Collector Streets" map
which generally shows where the city anticipates new collector roadways. This
application proposes to expand the scope and detail of this map. The map in Section F
depicts new collectors and backage roads in both the existing and proposed AOCL
Finally, in concert with the Idaho Transportation Department's anticipated interchange
at SHl6 and SH20-26, guidelines for a multi-modal center near this interchange are
also proposed. (See Section E ofthis application for more detail.)
2. Specific information on any property involved.
As noted in Section B.l.a. above, there are numerous existing uses in the proposed and
existing AOCI. Given the number of properties affected by this application, detailed
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 6
information is not being provided on specific properties. Further research on targeted
areas can be provided to the Commission or Council upon request.
3. The condition or situation which warrants a change being made in the Plan.
Staff believes there are three primary conditions that warrant a change to the Plan:
a) Rate and Type o/Growth : Since August 2002 (adoption ofthe current Plan), the City
of Meridian has witnessed unprecedented growth, much of which has occurred in
North Meridian. More than 8,000 new building lots have received preliminary plat
approval in the North Meridian Area alone. In 2004, 25% of all new residential
building permits within Ada County were issued within a six square mile area of
North Meridian. That figure was 14.6% in 2003. The North Slough Sewer Trunk,
extending from Ten Mile Road to Locust Grove Road between McMillan Road and
SH20-26, began construction in late 2002. This project came on-line ahead of
schedule and triggered additional development.
While a majority of the new development conforms with the adopted Future Land Use
Map and urban services are being provided per master plans, the pace of growth has
brought changes not anticipated in the 2002 Plan. Several large Planned Development
applications (300+ acres each) were approved for land use exceptions which allowed
non-residential uses at the arterial intersections instead of neighborhood centers at the
half mile as anticipated in the Plan (i.e. Bridgetower Crossing, Lochsa Falls,
Paramount). Also, now that new school and park sites, housing densities, and street
patterns have been approved, the Plan should be updated to reflect these growth
patterns.
b) SH16 River Crossing and Extension to 1-84: Governor Kempthorne's "Connecting
Idaho" plan (the Garvee bond project), signed in Spring 2005, included a proposal for
an extension of SHl6 from SH44 to 1-84. This new roadway has broad implications
for the NMA. This project was anticipated in 2002 and the existing Plan includes
policies which encourage a Ten Mile Road alignment. Both the private NMAP and
Washington Group International's 2001 NMA Traffic Study also anticipated the SHl6
extension. However, with the Garvee bonding one step closer to reality and with ITD
including SH16 study funds in their 2006 budget, it warrants the City of Meridian
updating its Plan to be more proactive in planning for this significant project.
The following reasons support a change ÍÌ'om Ten Mile Road to McDermott Road as
the preferred alignment (and help to justify a change to the Plan):
.
Instead of dividing our community at Ten Mile Road, the state highway would
be located at the edge of our Area of Impact--which would separate Meridian
from Nampa and Ada County ÍÌ'om Canyon County (south of Us tick Road).
The obstacles to preserving right-of-way and limiting development or existing
curb cuts along McDermott are fewer than Ten Mile Road.
.
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 7
.
Large existing parcels - there are fewer parcels to negotiate future right-of-way
purchase and the roadway impacts fewer property owners in the McDermott
corridor.
A McDermott alignment fits the logical progression of interchanges at two-
mile spacing along 1-84 (i.e. Meridian, Ten Mile, McDermott, Garrity)
.
c) Requestsfor Area of City Impact Expansion: Since adoption of the existing Plan, the
Mayor and City Council have received requests from individual property owners
outside the existing AOCI to receive urban services. Prior to September 2005.
Meridian City Code required a property to be within the AOCI and Urban Services
Planning Area before annexation and service extensions could occur. That regulation
was changed in the Unified Development Code to allow the City to annex property
outside the AOCI. Nevertheless, the AOCI boundary should be adjusted to reflect the
City's intended areas of future growth and service expansion. Amending the
Comprehensive Plan is the first step to expanding this boundary (prior to negotiating
the boundary with Ada County). While properties outside an AOCI have some
development rights, sound planning calls for urban and suburban development to
utilize sanitary sewer and municipal water where feasible. Since Meridian is the
nearest city to the interested properties and probably best suited to extend urban
services, staff was directed to include the AOCI expansion in this CPA application.
4. The public need for and benefit from such a change in the Plan.
The answer to this question begs another question - "which 'public' is being talked
about?" The public consists of a broad array of interests - often competing interests.
Agriculture, recreation, business, residential, and other interests have different
perspectives on this question. There may also be competing objectives between the
present and future needs of the community. Comments for and against the AGCI
expansion and Plan amendment were received at the May open house. The most effective
planning weighs all interests and the Commission and Council must decide which plans
further the interest of Meridian and the region as a whole. Below is a discussion of both
potential benefits and drawbacks to amending the Plan as proposed.
Potential Benefits: One ofthe primary functions of an AOCI is to designate and
accommodate urban scale development (e.g. higher populations, higher residential and
commercial densities, alternative transportation, etc.). Existing and prospective city
residents and developers benefit from a Plan that designates locations for principle land
uses and reflects uses already approved but not built. Utilities and other service providers
benefit from being able to predict and anticipate densities and future demands for their
respective service. Property owners adjacent to the AOCI and city limits benefit by being
able to participate in setting the direction and type of growth around their property.
If development is expected north of SH20-26 and west of McDermott Road (which it is,
unless permanent, legal tools/easements are put in place to guarantee the open space), it is
the responsibility of Ada County and cities to plan for these areas. This is especially true
as land speculation and development pressure increases due to nearby services. The
benefits to preceding growth with updated comprehensive and facility plans include more
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 8
efficient use of tax dollars and coordination of sewer, water, fire, police and other
servIces.
Potential Drawbacks: There is, of course, an inherent conflict between some rural and
urban uses. If Meridian expands its AOCI and urban development extends into the new
areas, the existing agricultural operations (e.g. nurseries, dairies, farms) that intend to
conduct business into the future will experience conflicts. Many of these concerns were
noted on the summary sheet ITom the open house. These property owners would prefer to
remain outside any AOCI and be buffered and protected ITom urban/suburban influences.
Another potential drawback to expanding the AOCI that could be perceived by residents is
the additional stress on the transportation system. Rural type uses and residential densities
will have far less demand on the system than the higher intensity activities associated with
cities. This same argument could be made for demand on electric, water and other utilities.
5. Documentation that no other solutions to the problem are presented by the current
policy of the Plan are possible or reasonable.
The existing Plan notes that the SHl6 extension may happen and, if so, would likely be
aligned with Ten Mile Road. Since that time, the amount of new development approved
on both Ten Mile Road and Black Cat Road has lead the city to believe McDermott is the
most appropriate corridor for this facility.
6. Development intentions for any land involved.
It is anticipated the City of Meridian will acquire land for public parks, easements for
sewer trunk lines and multi-use pathways and various domestic well sites within the
subject area. However, specific locations have not been identified at this point. Otherwise,
private development is expected to proceed in accordance with the adopted Plan and
ordinances.
7. Any other data and information needed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in
evaluating the proposal, such as who does it help, who does it hurt, how much is it
going to cost and who's going to pay for it.
To date, no other information has been requested by the Commission. Regarding the
question of who benefits and who is hurt, see Question #4 above. Several property owners
voiced opposition to the AOCI boundary being expanded.
If approved, the main costs of implementing the AOCI expansion and making the
amendments to the plan will be administrative expenses that are largely built into the
Planning & Zoning Department's budget. The Public Works Department has not currently
budgeted for the extension of the Black Cat Trunk to the north side ofSH20-26. Any costs
associated with this project would be borne by private developers.
c. Idaho Code Overview (AOCI)
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 9
Requirements for Renef!otiation: Idaho Code Section 67-6526 sets out the requirements for setting,
negotiating and renegotiating AOI boundaries. In particular:
1. Boundaries remain fixed until renegotiated. [Section 67 -6526( d).]
2. Renegotiation must follow the same provisions for adopting an AOI originally. [Section 67-
6526(d).]
3. Where a county does not approved the city's desired AOI, the city has resort to either a
committee offline [Section 67-6526((b)] or the district court [Section 67-6526(b).]
4. If there is an overlapping AOI boundary with another city, the cities are required to
negotiate a recommendation to the county. In the event either city disagrees with the AOI finally
adopted by the county pertaining to the overlapping area, it may request an election be held, funded
by the county, for persons owning property in the disputed area. [Section 67-6526( c)]
5. In setting an AOI, the county or district court is required to consider three (3) factors
[Section 67-6526(b)]:
a. trade area;
b. geographic factors; and,
c. areas that can reasonably be expected to be annexed to the city in the future.
Trade Area: Trade area can be defined as the area needed to provide a city an economic base in
which to support its self. This base is not only the area of the city and the AOCI but also
involves the areas surrounding a city that brings people into the city for services. Historically,
Meridian has been associated with a large trade area extending north to SH20-26, west into
eastern Canyon County, south past Lake Hazel, and east to the Boise City limits.
An infonnal survey of residents north of SH20- 26 revealed that this area identifies with Meridian
more than any other jurisdiction. There is no river crossing between Linder and Star, so residents
in this area are forced to travel south for services. Also, the 2001 WGI Traffic Study projected a
vast majority of new trips to SH20-26 being generated ftom south of SH20-26 and it could be
expected that any commercial uses on the north side of the highway would benefit ftom Meridian
customers for this reason. It is logical that both the north and south sides of SH20-26 are planned
under one jurisdiction and use one set of development ordinances, especially for the four miles
between the two river crossing streets.
Public comments were received at the May open house that Star Road functions as a natural
boundary between Meridian and Nampa, with properties west of Star Road associating with and
"feeling" more like Nampa. This boundary is especially emphasized south of Us tick Road where
McDennott becomes the county line and Star/Robinson Road is entirely within Canyon County.
However, for this area north of Ustick, the trade area question becomes less clear. Staff expects
that a survey of property owners in this area may be necessary prior to submitting an application
to Ada County if the Commission and Council approve the expansion.
Geof!raohic Factors: Among the geographic factors supporting Meridian's proposed AOCI are:
current capacity and capability to provide essential public services as well as planned
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 10
improvements; transportation system corridor and services; and annexation trends and requests.
A detailed analysis of the following essential public services is being developed for any potential
negotiation with Ada County for the AOCI expansion:
. Sewer
. Water
. Police
. Fire and Emergency Services
. Library
. Schools
. Parks and Recreation Facilities
. Irrigation Systems
. Solid Waste
. Electric Utility
. Public Transportation
Annexation in the Reasonable Future: Meridian's existing city limits extend to SH20-26 at four
different points within Sections 25 - 27 (TAN, R.l W), between Black Cat and Meridian Road.
Several parcels on the north side of the highway are currently contiguous at these points and are
eligible for annexation today.
Regarding the annexation potential for the area west of McDermott Road, the city limits extend
as far as ~ mile west of Black Cat Road on Ustick Road and a 12 mile west ofTen Mile Road on
SH20-26. A path of annexation west of McDermott Road is dependent upon several intervening
property owners between the existing city limits and McDermott. The main obstacle in
determining this path is the unknown alignment of SH 16. In either case, Meridian city limits are
closer to these parcels than either Nampa or Star. The draft Future Land Use Map designates a
preservation corridor for this highway and the draft policies propose no urban scale development
for a 12 mile west of Black Cat Road until the alignment is identified and the federal government
has approved the location. So, if this policy is adopted, it may present a delay in property owners
being able to secure a path of annexation. (See Section E for further discussion ofthis issue.)
North Meridian Area CPA Application
Introduction and Sections A, B & C
Page 11
SECTION D
PROPOSED AREA OF CITY IMPACT MAP
-
~
L
Ì'1\\
agle
~ Star
?~\:
"----
--
L~-""'.'"""
~
~'§~
J I 1 ....... - ~
"} ~ I '\.. '>-,
\,," --" . 1-' K'\.J.
~ ( ""\ r 1- 1J-, r I, I
I r I V;;..., ~----.,
-
::.II I
-- f-- L,\ "80' I :":~
""'- 1 .J " - ~ '-"'~ r~
II.. ~ I.... +--L CI '"b~"
) -~ ~~~
H- -- )'\ ~
Ì\ ----, - \'ì
N
w
E
s
.
~......
SECTION E
TRANSPORT A TION / INFRASTRUCTURE
TEXT AMENDMENT
(Chapter VI)
(Unless otherwise noted, all of the following text is new and, if approved, will be
incorporated into Chapter VI of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan in the sections as
specified in the boxes. Page numbers refer to the existing Plan.)
I Page 52, Paragraph 2.a.
. Delete the list of arterial roads and instead reference the' Ada County Functional
Street Classification System' map (latest edition).
. Arterial Planning in North Meridian
There are three state highways in the North Meridian area that have a significant
influence on the arterial system and deserve special attention:
1. U.S. 20-26 (Chinden Blvd.). This highway serves as the north boundary of the
City's Area of Impact east of Linder Road and bisects the Area of Impact west
of Linder Road. It is expected to be five to seven lanes wide at build-out of the
city. It separates Meridian's distinctly urban growth patterns from the City of
Eagle, with its low-density, semi-rural character. The City of Meridian will
establish ordinances and development standards that preserve the highway as
a major regional transportation facility, connecting the cities of Caldwell,
Nampa, Star, Meridian, Eagle and Boise. The City believes this roadway
needs to be protected from multiple access points and preserved as a high
capacity connector. The City supports beautification and appropriate sound
mitigation measures along the US 20-26 corridor.
2. State Highway 16 (future extension). The extension of State Highway 16 from
State Highway 44 to 1-84 is a critical step to providing regional mobility for
citizens from north Ada County and Gem County to 1-84 and south Ada
County. Identifying the most useful and environmentally and fiscally
responsible location for this new highway is crucial to the future character of
west Meridian.
3. State Hi!zhway 55 (EalZle Road). Eagle Road is adjacent to the east side of the
North Meridian area and is currently the most heavily traveled road in the
Treasure Valley. Issues that impact Eagle Road traffic will also have an
impact on North Meridian. It is expected that Eagle Road will be improved in
the future to include integrated traffic signals, safety medians, landscaping,
new lighting, and other improvements as per the Eagle Road Corridor Study.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 1
,','
. >
. Urban and Residential Collectors
The transportation system's second tier is the collector system. Collectors are
generally categorized as either urban or residential. Urban co\lectors are designed to
carry higher volumes of uaffic and (often seamlessly) connect one arterial to another
through a giveu mile. They also may move at higher speeds than resideutial
collectors. The latter are typically constructed by private developers at Ibe time of
construction of a subdivision and have a more reßidential character. They mayor may
not connect throngh an entire mile section. Collector roads were the subject of an Ada
County Highway District-funded study by JUB Engine"'" in August 2001. The City
of Meridian supports and will apply the following conclusions of that study:
a. Intersection Spacing. The intersections of collector roads and arterial roads
should be located at the VZ mile point within any given section.
b. Alignment. Collectors should extend in an essentially straight line for 200 feet
to 400 feet from the intersection. Beyond that point the alignment is flexible.
c. Discontinuity BetWeen Sections. CoHectors shonld not be in a straight
alignment for more than two miles to prevent their use as de facto arterials.
. Delete the list of coneetor roads and instead reference I) the most recent F edera1
Functional Classification Map for Ada County adopted by the Conununity Planning
Association of Sou\hwest Idaho and 2) \he functional classification map adopted by
the Ada County Highway District.
. Replace Figure VI-II, FUnctional Classification Map (pg. 53), with a reference to the
latest such map approved by the COMPASS Board of Directors.
[page 54, Paragraph 2.b. ]
. Add the following policy to the "Path System" paragraph:
"The City of Meridian shall secure the right of public and recreational access for
public use wbere City-designated public pathways are witlrin inigation district canal
or drain easements or rights-of-way."
[Page 72
. Replace Table Vl-9, Roadway Projects Planned for Meridian and lmpact Area, on
Page 72 a reference to the latest Capital Improvements Program and Five Year Work
Program as adopted by IDe Ada County Highway District and IDe TIP as adopted by
Compass.
Add a note supporting implementation of the Downtown Meridian Transportation
Management Plan, which proposes a solution to the traffiC situation on Main and
Meridian roads in downtown Meridian. The new design is called the "Split conidor"
and will create a one-way traffic system betWeen the 1-84 interchange and approximately
Page 2
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
the railroad tracks with Main Street being northbound and Meridian Road being
southbound. North of the railroad, the system will retain its two-way traffic movement.
This project is described in more detail in the plan.
I Page 73, top of page
.
Add a new section as follows:
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN THE NORTH MERIDIAN AREA
Regional Transportation Planning & Cooperation
1. The City of Meridian will work together with the transportation authorities,
specifically ACHD, COMPASS and ITD, to protect the US 20-26 and SH69
corridors as regional transportation routes and gateways to not only Meridian but
also to Boise, Eagle, Star, Kuna, Nampa and Caldwell.
2. The City of Meridian will coordinate closely with ITD to detennine the most
appropriate alignment of the future SHl6 extension and to preserve appropriate
rights-of-way for all state highways. Weare committed to effective land use
policies that preserve future transportation corridors. The City will protect the
public's investments in existing and planned highways and separated grade
interchanges.
3. The City of Meridian will coordinate closely with lTD, Ada County, Boise City,
businesses, neighborhood groups and other stakeholders in the Eagle Road/SH55
corridor to implement the 2004 Eagle Road Arterial Study (prepared by
Cambridge Systematics for lTD).
4. The 2030 Long-Range Regional Transportation Plan (administered by
COMPASS) is hereby adopted by reference as part of Meridian's Comprehensive
Plan.
Key Transportation Assumptions
.
US 20-26 will be a limited access highway that retains a speed of at least 45 miles per
hour.
A grade separated interchange is anticipated at the following intersections: SHI6/US
20-26, SHl6/Ustick Road and SH16/Franklin Road.
Multi-modal centers will be encouraged near these interchanges
Future bus routes will be on the arterial grid and will primarily serve neighborhood
centers
Ultimately, all arterial intersections and many half-mile intersections will have signal
lights
.
.
.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 3
.
-
.
McMillan Road provides the best opportunity to create a North Meridian
"community-oriented" transit boulevard, with emphasis on amenities and pedestrian-
scale neighborhoods, services and character. Ustick and other roads are also
appropriate corridors for future transit.
Arterials
1. The section-line arterial roadway network shall serve as the basis for an efficient
and cost-effective transportation system.
2. Arterial roadways shall be classified as principal or minor, based on the
applicable Transportation Authority determinations for full build-out estimates.
4. Access control standards shall be implemented to improve traffic flow, to
minimize the number of travel lanes, to accommodate drainage and to provide
for pedestrian safety.
0 Primary access to arterials shall generally be provided at quarter and half-mile
intervals with right-inJright-out access provided at intervening points.
5. Pedestrian safety must be balanced with efficient traffic flow.
0 Designated pedestrian crossings shall be provided at all signalized
intersections.
0 Center medians, when constructed, shall provide "safety zones" for
pedestrians.
5. Arterial intersection design alternatives are encouraged at key intersections that
will assure traffic flow is balanced with pedestrian access and the viability of
adjacent land uses.
6. Non-structural surface drainage areas are encouraged at key intersection
between primary access points where roadways narrow.
0 Sidewalks shall be located behind such drainage areas, away from traffic
lanes.
Collectors and Backage Roads
Figure VI-8.A, North Meridian Auto Circulation Map, is a map of planned collectors
and backage roads in the North Meridian Area. This map is intended to replace Figure
VI-8, Auto Circulation: Future Collector Streets, for the area between Ustick Road
and Chinden Boulevard and west of Locust Grove Road. It also includes the
expanded Area of City Impact boundaries north of Chinden Boulevard and west of
McDermott Road.
The map legend on Figure VI-8.A shows four different types of new roadways:
Collectors, Preferred Collectors, Backage Roads and Preferred Backage Roads. The
solid lines depict either existing or planned roads and the dashed lines depict the
City's preferred or recommended location of future roads.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 4
..'
Special Notes for Implementing FÚrure VI-8.A. North Meridian Auto Circulation
Map: The two collectors shown on the north side of US 20-26 at half-mile locations
are called-out as key access points to collect future local road traffic. However, this
figure does not imply that the City of Meridian will approve future developments
which do not take into consideration access needs for development north of the
Phyllis Canal. It is fully expected that the City of Meridian will require at least two
stub streets to ensure parcels north of the canal have access to US 20-26.
Concern has been expressed that the backage roads should be continuous for the
entire length of US 20-26, but are not shown as such on the map. We therefore note
the City's intent to require continuous connectivity parallel to Chinden. The backage
roads noted on the map relate to non-residential uses and are not intended for ITont-on
housing. The other parallel connections that are not shown on the map could have
front-on housing if determined appropriate by ACHD based on projected traffic
counts. Such connections should also be reasonably direct and not overly circuitous
in order to give local traffic an option to using Chinden for local trips and to access
signalized intersections.
Additional descriptions and policies for each category are listed below:
Collector Roads (solid blue lines)
1. Intersections of new collectors and Chinden BoulevardlUS 20-26 shall be limited
to one per mile and located as close to the half mile as feasible.
2. Intersections of new collectors and arterial roads shall be located as close to the
half mile as feasible and, where needed, as close to the quarter mile as feasible.
3. Where a new collector (solid line) falls entirely within the boundaries of a
proposed development, the developer shall be responsible to construct the
roadway to an ACHD-approved collector road standard and as close to the
depicted location as possible.
4. Collectors shall be designed to provide efficient traffic movement ITom
neighborhoods to the arterial system while maintaining the integrity and internal
accessibility of neighborhoods.
5. Collector roadway restrictions shall be required only ITom the point where
internal street trip counts exceed local street standards to the arterial roadway.
6. Where alternate means of vehicular access to the collector are provided (e.g.
alleys), front-on uses and housing on the collector are encouraged. This policy is
intended to promote more attractive collectors with uses oriented to the road and
to discourage any "tunnel effect" created by lining the street with fences.
7. Where the collector falls on a shared property line, the developer shall have the
option to either construct the full roadway on hislher property or construct only
the minimum street section necessary for that development. In the latter case, the
adjoining property owner must agree in writing to dedicate the balance ofthe
required collector right-of-way to ACHD at the same time.
8. The intent of constructing a collector "loop" near the intersection of two arterial
roads (especially where commercial or mixed use designations are shown) is to
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 5
reduce intersection congestion and to provide primary vehicular access off of the
collector. The City will generally discourage direct access to arterials within 500
feet of an arterial intersection where a collector and/or local commercial road can
be provided.
Preferred Collector Roads (dashed blue lines)
1. These lines represent more generalized locations of future collectors where the
planned land uses will likely warrant construction of a more limited access road
(e.g. medium to high density housing, community park, etc.). The purpose is to
create a more predictable and functional street circulation system and to
encourage direct access to commercial services from within the same section
without needing to use the arterial roads.
2. Developments in areas where preferred collectors are shown should incorporate a
collector road in the site design or accomplish similar circulation goals through an
alternative method.
3. When collectors are constructed in these locations, the collector road standards
listed above shall apply.
Backage Roads (solid green lines)
1. Backage roads are intended to serve primarily non-residential land uses that ITont
onto a state highway. They differ from ITontage roads in that buildings,
landscaping or other uses are to be constructed between the highway and the road.
2. The purpose ofthese roads is: 1) to facilitate ITD's and the City's limited access
policies to state highways and 2) to effectively move traffic ITom the highway to
the businesses and other uses that ITont state highways.
3. Residential uses should not have direct vehicular access to backage roads so as to
prevent cut through traffic or other potentially unsafe traffic conditions.
4. Backage roads are strongly encouraged to be public but may be private where it is
clearly demonstrated that trip generations and travel patterns will not benefit ITom
a public facility.
5. Where a backage road is private, cross-access agreements with adjacent properties
will be required to accomplish the desired circulation goals.
Preferred Backage Roads (dashed green lines)
1. These lines represent more generalized locations of future backage roads where
the planned land uses will likely warrant their construction.
2. Developments where preferred backage roads are shown should incorporate them
in the site design or accomplish similar circulation goals through some alternative
method.
3. When backage roads are constructed in these locations, the standards listed above
for backage roads shall apply.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 6
Public Transportation
1. Land use patterns and residential densities along McMillan Road, east of
McDermott Road, shall encourage future public transportation as North
Meridian's "community-oriented" corridor. Transit is also supported along other
roads, such as Ustick, Linder and others.
2. Public transportation facilities will be planned with Valley Regional Transit
(VR T) and "stops" shall be provided in designated activity centers, particularly
neighborhood centers, throughout the City.
3. North/south arterial linkages to east/west public transportation routes will be
designated.
Future State Highway 16 Corridor Area
Pu11Jose & Intent
The City of Meridian supports the Idaho Transportation Department's (ITD) plan to
extend SHl6 from SH44 to 1-84. The City's preferred alignment, after crossing south
of the Boise River, is to follow the existing McDermott Road right-of-way south to 1-
84.
It is the City of Meridian's intention to limit annexations and new development
within the McDermott Road area until a plan is approved that specifies the SHl6
right-of-way location and the associated right-of-way acquisition needs.
The City is concerned about the fiscal, environmental and general quality of life
effects that a new state highway can have upon existing and future citizens. We find it
is in the best interest of the city to protect the McDermott Road area from
development until more details are known about the size, location, function and land
use impacts of this regional transportation facility.
The City supports the following policies listed in COMPASS's 2030 long-range
transportation plan (limited update) regarding transportation corridor preservation:
a. CaMP ASS will coordinate with the cities, Ada County, the Ada County
Highway District, and the Idaho Transportation Department to improve
plans' and ordinances' abilities to preserve needed rights-of-way through
adequate setbacks.
b. CaMP ASS will work with local and state elected officials to increase
funding for long-term preservation of rights-of-way, which could
substantially reduce future costs and reduce conflicts with neighborhoods
and businesses. One option to be considered should be a dedicated fund
restricted to rights-of-way preservation.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 7
c. COMPASS will support, in coordination with the Idaho Transportation
Department and/or the Ada County Highway District, a study to identify
specific alignment ofthe west county river crossing to align with State
Highway 16.
Support for McDermott Road Alignment
The City of Meridian supports the McDermott Road alignment for the following
reasons:
. Instead of dividing our community at Ten Mile Road or Black Cat Road, the state
highway would be located at the edge of our Area of Impact--which would
separate Meridian from Nampa and Ada County from Canyon County (south of
Ustick Road). Although the highway would divide the four square miles west of
McDermott Road from the rest of Meridian, the City believes this area is large
enough to still be blended with the Meridian community.
. The obstacles to preserve sufficient right-of-way and to limit development and
curb cuts along McDermott Road are fewer than along Ten Mile Road or Black
Cat Road.
. There are fewer existing parcels to negotiate future right-of-way purchase from
and the highway impacts fewer property owners in the McDermott Road corridor.
. A McDermott Road alignment fits the logical progression of freeway interchanges
at two-mile spacing along 1-84 (i.e. Meridian, Ten Mile, McDermott, Garrity).
Guiding Policies
. The City of Meridian supports a collaborative, public-private partnership with
property owners, ITD, Ada County, Canyon County, adjacent cities and other
affected parties to identify a preferred alignment for the future SHl6 extension.
The City sees itself as a partner in this effort, with the Idaho Transportation
Department likely in the lead role once funding for the corridor has been
determined.
. The City of Meridian encourages Ada County to adopt the City's access
management policy for the future SHl6 (from Title 11, Chapter 3, Article H of
Meridian's Unified Development Code) pertaining to development within
Meridian's Area of Impact that precedes annexation. This policy states that no
access shall be allowed except at specific interchange locations as established by
the Idaho Transportation Department.
I Page 76, after Section C, "Water" I
.
Insert a new paragraph called "Drainage" and re-Iabel numbering:
"The handling of storm water drainage presents an ever-present challenge for both the
public and private sectors. The Ada County Highway District has completed
drainage studies for portions of Meridian's Area ofImpact and is studying additional
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 8
.~
areas. Given the topography and water table, alternatives for handling of surface
drainage are limited.
The implications are significant. If subsurface solutions are not available, then large
areas ofland will be consumed for drainage facilities. Those areas could serve jointly
as open space and storm water facilities, if designed to handle the low-volume storms
without restricting the area's use for other purposes, including recreation.
The use of natural and existing constructed drains for storm water must be explored,
and standards established to make the use of such drains a feasible alternative to the
consumption of large areas of land. This is an area where cooperation between the
public agencies and development community is needed. The City will apply the
following general policies when reviewing new developments and drainage:
1. Drainage solutions shall be formulated to address the requirements ofthe public
(City of Meridian and ACHD), irrigation/drainage districts, and the development
community.
2. Solutions may include subsurface or surface facilities, and discharge into drains.
. "Non-structural" drainage bio-swales along the arterial roadways may
minimize "regional" solutions and reduce costs.
. Surface facilities may include public and private open space areas where
design for low-volume events enables the use of the area for its primary
purpose of recreation or other open space activity.
3. The public agencies (City, County and / or ACHD), in concert with the
development community, will work with the irrigation/drainage entity to resolve
issues of liability and discharge standards for drainage from public rights-of-way
and facilities, including local streets."
I Page 79, Goal II, Obj. A I
.
Add a new policy (#17) as follows: "At a minimum, collectors must extend in a
generally straight line for 200 to 400 feet beyond the intersection with an arterial.
Beyond that point, the alignment of the collector is flexible. A public street system
should be continuous through the full mile section. This does not preclude the use of
traffic calming measures, nor does it imply the roadway has a straight alignment."
North Meridian Area CPA - Section E
Transportation/Infrastructure Text Amendment (Chapter VI)
Page 9
SECTION F
NORTH MERIDIAN AREA
CIRCULATION PLAN MAP
NOVEMBER 2005
(see attached)
North Meridian Auto Circulation Map
0
æ ,
~f--- .f". .'. '". "t'. .-
« - ,
~ -J
(,)11 -- -]
z. ; ,
¡ II
. i I
1 !
1 ! I
Ii ,,' J
1 n",
" 0'
1
.
1
¡'
1
1
0'
~fl'
0
«
~ æ
~I I
. . . . . . ... .
,,-u /' '" ~,~::~~
\.JVtðndiã" , ~,;
'~(,¡;."
Figure VI - 8. A.
i
r~'. ~ 'f' . .'. . ~C..., ro,- "":,'" "~'[ . . . - --¡
- W CHINDEN BL\iJ I,.. _..,uL-
. .'.'.------.......-.~....-..~..,
--
,'-' j
J
'" L"
W MCMIL!j>.N RD
....
!
i
'. i
L-
, E CHINDEN 'BLVD
.. ill -,.--..---
,
"-
-'-"-'-'~-T~~-"-"~:"-
, '
,
,
'-
.'. iIIn.'-
" ,
,
,
,
--~, ,
rUn ,
1: - "
-I ,I
, I
, ,
i-
I
,
]
,I
,
....
,
,
,
,
,
,
,'"
"..
o!
1:1::'
,
f-'
;}¡
><'
.. 0\
"""~,J ....;..~t
.'-.'..,'" ',," ,
.. Z, oj
~ Ia: f
I :~)
I ":::;;,
,, " ..,,-,
", Z,
,'" WI
¡' ,J 1- ~-.l- " \~ -,~~'~¡ -- W US~ICK ~~ ~I,'_:"~'
'. .n. --- ----~~-~'-"'---""'~"---""""---'-""----"'.....-1"-"""-"
','" "'l,~=n..-_!~i,;"" "'."'1..";~
,"
--
0
a:
f-
....
0
:::;;
a:
W
0
0
:::;;
..Z
Legend
N
W~E
S
~. . ..
SECTION LINE I. . .1 Meridian Impact Boundary
URBAN COLLECTOR Meridian City LImits
Backage Road
Preferred Backage Road
Collector Road
."...,,- Preferred Collector Road
0 0,25 0,5 1 Miles
I I I I I I I'
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
Approved Subdivisions
Date: 2/24106
,--:
SECTION G
LAND USE
TEXT AMENDMENT
(Chapter VII)
(Unless otherwise noted, all of the following text is new and, if approved, will be
incorporated into Chapters VII of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan in the sections as
spec~fied in the boxes. Page numbers refer to the existing Plan.)
I Page 92, Urban Service Planning Area (USP A)
. Insert changes from Resolution No. 03-401.
. Add a reference to the USP A being expanded to match the proposed Area of City
Impact (AOCI) boundary, if approved by Ada County.
I Page 93, Figure VII-2
.
Insert the amended Future Land Use Map
. Amend Note #2 on the Future Land Use Map as follows:
"2. In residential areas, other residential densities will be considered without
requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. However, the density can only be
changed one "step" (i.e. low to medium, not low to high, etc.). This "one step"
policy will not apply to the "Low Density Residential" land in Sections 30.31 and
32 of TAN. R.l W. These areas must be developed as low density."
.
Insert a new "Residential" policy as follows:
North Chinden Area: Residential uses north of Chinden Boulevard and within a ~
mile or less from the rim should have lot sizes ranging from 12-1 acres, ensuring
compatibility with SpurWing Country Club to the east. Use of transitional lot
sizes and clustering of smaller lots adjacent to the non-residential and rim
property is encouraged.
I Page 97, Mixed Use para. I
. Amend first sentence to read, "There are tlH=ee five sub-categories ofthe Mixed Use
designation." (This correction adds the "WWTP" and "Interchange" designations.)
I Page 98, top of page, before "MU-Neighborhood"
.
Insert new, mixed use policies that apply to all MU areas as follows:
North Meridian Area CPA - Section G
Land Use Text Amendment (Chapter VII)
Page 1
..
A mixed use project shall include a principal use (retail, office, professional or
residential) and at least one other type of land use. Exceptions may be granted
for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis.
In addition to the principal use, other qualifying mixed uses may include
community facilities such as a school, public park, civic building or public
safety facility.
All mixed use projects shall be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the
section by both vehicles and pedestrians.
I Page 98, bottom of page, below "MU-WWTP"
.
Insert a new section as follows:
Mixed Use-Interchange. The purpose of this category is to designate areas for
construction of future SH 16 interchanges and to designate land that will have a high
degree of visibility and be served by highway interchange ramps and restricted local
access. These three areas (located at US 20-26, Ustick Road and Franklin Road)
differ from the other mixed use categories in that a much stronger emphasis will be
placed upon gateway elements and traffic flow/trip generation factors when reviewing
new land use applications. Uses in these areas will need to be compatible with the
impacts of a freeway interchange. However, these areas are not intended for high
volume retail or uses that are better suited in the neighborhood centers or commercial
areas. The intention is to protect the immediate vicinity of the interchange from traffic
conflicts and shift the high traffic-generating uses closer to local road access points.
The following standards and policies will apply to this category:
. The following types of land use themes are envisioned at the three interchange
locations along SHI6:
0 US 20-26: Commuter Services, Technology/Research, Business Park
0 Ustick Road: Educational, Civic, Light Retail, Residential
0 Franklin Road: Trucking and Freight, Light Industrial, Hospitality
. Land uses within the MU-Interchange areas and adjacent to the SHl6 corridor
should be carefully examined for their potential impacts on existing and
designated neighborhood centers and commercial activity areas. Discourage
creation or establishment of uses deemed more appropriate to activity centers.
. Vehicular access points should be prohibited within a ~ mile or more of the
interchange ramps. Future uses should be planned to integrate with the
backage road circulation system shown on Figure VI-8.A.
. The City supports the development of Specific Area Plans for each of the
interchange areas. Such plans should be done in cooperation with landowners
and other affected parties.
. Any new development at or near interchange areas should promote a nodal
development pattern where buildings are clustered, off-street parking is
screened in the rear of the parcel and, where practical, inter-connected to
adjoining parcels.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section G
Land Use Text Amendment (Chapter VII)
Page 2
!
.
The SHI6/US 20-26 interchange will be one of only two regional gateways to
the City of Meridian for travelers coming from north ofthe Boise River (the
other being Linder Road). As such, buildings, landscaping and other design
features at this interchange need to reflect Meridian's heritage, quality and
character.
Design of the SHI6/US 20-26 interchange and the adjoining land uses must
give special consideration-to the more scenic and environmentally sensitive
area on the north side of US 20-26. The more intensive land uses should be
sited on the south side of US 20-26.
Regional ridesharing, park-and-ride and transit transfer facilities are
encouraged within the SHI6/US 20-26 interchange area.
The MU-Interchange area at Ustick Road, west ofSH16, should minimize
retail and auto-oriented services and transition rapidly from the interchange to
the more rural, low density character intended along the county line.
Examples of uses include middle or high schools, post office or library
branches, office uses, rowhouse/patio home developments, athletic clubs, etc.
.
.
.
I Page 100, top of page, before Table VII-4
.
Add three new sections:
Regional Planning & Cooperation
1. The City of Meridian is committed to fulfilling the terms of its Area of City
Impact agreement with Ada County as well as similar agreements of neighboring
cities, including Eagle, Kuna, Star and Boise. We also note the City's intent to
continue negotiations with surrounding cities on area of impact expansions.
2. The City of Meridian intends to enter into an inter-local agreement or
Memorandum of Understanding with neighboring cities agreeing not to annex
into approved Areas of City Impact of those cities.
3. The City of Meridian will cooperate with the City of Eagle to notify them of any
development applications being processed along our shared boundary, especially
US 20-26/Chinden Blvd.
Future State Highway 16 Corridor
.
Land within the future SHl6 corridor (to be identified in cooperation with the
Idaho Transportation Department, property owners and other agencies) will be
protected from strip commercial zoning and development. The City does not
intend to strip zone land adjacent to the future highway for non-residential uses.
Such uses will be targeted to key intersections and where vacant or surplus
commercial space is already available and zoned.
North Meridian Area CPA - Section G
Land Use Text Amendment (Chapter VII)
Page 3
!
Transit Friendly Development
.
The City will consider the option of reducing development application and/or
building permit fees for projects that incorporate features which enhance
alternative transportation and are transit fiiendly. Said developments are
envisioned within designated neighborhood centers and/or within commercial
activity centers.
Said developments must incorporate the following development and design
principles:
A mix ofland uses
Buildings are oriented to provide the maximum level of service to pedestrians,
bicyclists and transit users
The development constructs alternative transit features such as a bus shelter
(where approved by ValleyRide), bicycle locker facilities, a park and ride lot
or similar facilities
Residential densities are at least 8 dwelling units per acre and designed to
comply with the Traditional Neighborhood design standards in the Unified
Development Code
.
Park and ride lots and other transit-supportive facilities are encouraged at
interchanges throughout the City. Valley Regional Transit and Ada County
Highway District Commuteride should be partners in detennining appropriate
facilities at each interchange.
I Page 100, Table VII-4
. Update table with data reflecting the expanded AOCI
I Page 102 - 109, Goals, Objectives & Actions
. Insert all applicable "Action" policies from above into this section and into Table VIll-
I (in Chapter VIII)
North Meridian Area CPA - Section G
Land Use Text Amendment (Chapter VII)
Page 4
SECTION H
AMENDED FUTURE LAND USE MAP
NOVEMBER 2005
(see attached)
I;
~l>
"?
c..
!I:I
.~ ~ å I
"OU)"
-~ => ¡
:;:¡¡ -g ~ i
Õ 5' "
>'<1) ]I
ð ~ I I - (,
"5 -,
u.
~l>
"q
~
~ 2
~ . ~ 00
f f ~ ~ n
~t ~.,oß
m ð~ ~;'~
~~~i~:~!~
1~~~i8¡¡;d
t:iwZ~ ~ ~~~
n ~ ~:. . '"iI ...
"'.. ,.
I
~~]"- ~]'i&
i' I ~ ~ I . I 0
" ~ i~,:d ~ ~ Š '"
~ ~.j~~~~.~ ~ J-.
~ i ~ .~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J I 'I!
~ ¡. ~ . 0 . ~ . . . ~' :1
5 ~~~:!1!~:i~~~o~z I
~II 1111 §II~ ~
.. - -.- ......--m