HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo from Planning
City Council Hearing Date: February 21,2006
Transmittal Date: February 16, 2006
RECEIVED
FEe {"
City': -,.,
""'- U /" cm~ . ',,-
"-/VI er¡diá¡j"'-; -\~
A IDAHO ,i
~, -y
Q.
~"F¡ ...
dr.,TRE^-"\JRI;V~ , SlHe£
1!,1903
MEMORANDUM:
To:
Mayor and City Council
Kristy Vigil, Assistant City Planner '{JI
From:
Subject:
Final Plat Modification Application - Request to Modify the Approved
Fencing for Silverleaf Subdivision No.1 and No.2 (File No. MFP-O6-001)
Staff has reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments:
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Liberty Development, Inc., has applied for final plat modification approval to modify
the approved fencing in Silverleaf Subdivision Nos. 1 and 2 The approved fencing shown on the
landscape plan for Silverleaf Nos. 1 and 2 is either five foot solid vinyl for the perimeter fencing and
one common area lot, or four foot open vision constructed of wrought iron for common area and micro
path lots. The applicant has constructed the perimeter fencing of six foot solid vinyl and six foot solid
cedar and the fencing adjacent to the common area and micro path lots has been constructed of four
foot solid vinyl. Fencing on the eastern and southern boundaries of Silverleaf No.2 is shown on the
approved landscape plan to be constructed of five foot solid vinyl. The fencing has been constructed by
the developer of Lochsa Falls Subdivision and the subject applicant plans to retain the fencing.
Silverleaf Subdivision Nos. 1 and 2 are located on the east side of N. Ten Mile Road, approximately Ijz
mile south of Chinden Boulevard, in the NW 1,4 of Setion 26, TAN., R.IW. The site has already been
platted.
STAFF ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATION
As stated above, the fencing in Silverleaf Subdivision Nos. 1 and 2 is already constructed. The Unified
Development Code (UDC) does not have a requirement for pennanent perimeter fencing and staff
supports the proposed change in materials. Further, UDC 11~3A.7 does allow for four foot solid fencing
adjacent to common area and micro path lots. Therefore, staff supports the solid fencing adjacent to the
common area and micro path lots, and the change in materials for such fencing.
Staff recommends approval to modify the approved fencing for Silverleaf Subdivision Nos. 1 and 2
(MFP~O6~OO 1), as proposed by the applicant.
MFP~O6-00 1 Silverleaf Subdivision No.1 and No.2
Page 1