Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-10-18 ACHD Development Services Department CHID a Maw"', C0 r,' 5.-ei Project/File: Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/AZ-2021-0065 This is an annexation and rezone application to annex 40 acres into the City of Eagle with R-8, L-O, and M-E zoning and a preliminary plat application to develop 93 residential lots, 13 common lots, 3 commercial lots, and 3 future right-of-way lots. This application includes a development a development agreement with the City of Meridian. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: 3235 N McDermott Road Vicinity Map Staff Approval: October 18', 2021 ; Applicant: Kristen McNeill The Land Group, Inc. 4462 E Shore Drive, Suite #100 Eagle, ID 83616 ' .p, _ i� Staff Contact: Kelly Bruner Phone: 387-6132 " E-mail: kbruner(o)-achdidaho.org Paige Bankhead � r Phone: 387-6293 d E-mail: pbankhead(c_achdidaho.org �.# e� �' ----- ,,' r — 111 A. Findings of Fact 1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of an annexation and rezone application to annex 40 acres into the City of Meridian with R-8, L-O, and WE zoning and a preliminary plat application to develop 93 residential lots, 13 common lots, 3 commercial lots, and 3 right-of-way lots on 40 acres. This application includes a development application with the City of Eagle. The applicant's proposal is consistent with the City of Meridian's future land use map, which designates this area as Mixed Use-Neighborhood. 2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction I Land Use Zoning North Medium-Density Residential R-8 South Rural-Urban Transition Ada Count RUT East Rural-Urban Transition Ada Count RUT West Medium-Density Residential R-8 3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 1 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the site: • MPP20-0015: Chukar Ridge Subdivision, a development application for 63 residential lots and 8 common lots on 15.42 acres located north of the site and approved by ACHD on June 17tn 2020. 5. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site. 6. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 0.68 centerline miles of new public road. 7. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD. 8. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP): • Ustick Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from Star Road to McDermott Road between 2026 and 2030. 9. Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan: ACHD's Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan (BMP) was adopted by the ACHD Commission in May of 2009 and was update in 2018. The plan seeks to implement the Planned Bicycle Network to support bicycling as a viable transportation option for Ada County residents with a wide range of ages and abilities, maintain bicycle routes in a state of good repair in order to ensure they are consistently available for use, promote awareness of existing bicycle routes and features and support encouragement programs and to facilitate coordination and cooperation among local jurisdictions in implementing the Roadways to Bikeways Plan recommendations. The BMP identifies McDermott Road as a Level 3 facility that will be constructed as part of a future ACHD project. B. Traffic Findings for Consideration Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,381 additional vehicle trips per day and 161 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour, based on the traffic impact study. 1. Traffic Impact Study Kittelson & Associates, Inc. prepared a traffic impact study for the proposed Aviator Springs Subdivision. An executive summary of the findings as presented by Kittelson &Associates, Inc. is in Attachment 3. The following executive summary is not the opinion of ACHD staff. ACHD has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study for consistency with ACHD policies and practices and may have additional requirements beyond what is noted in the summary. ACHD Staff comments on the submitted traffic impact study can be found below under staff comments. 2 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Future•Road,__ � N � i Q McMillan , , , Achievement-Ave, E Y, E [J v Q L E L [n p _ a'• ,'+'it O�•� _ � .� � ► Ustick lid x—•r �'" Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff comments are provided by District Traffic Services and Development Review staff. a. Policy Mitigation Proposals: Mitigation recommendations shall be provided within the report. At a minimum, for each roadway segment and intersection that does not meet the minimum acceptable level of service planning threshold or v/c ratio, the report must discuss feasible measures to avoid or reduce the impact to the system. To be considered adequate, measures should be specific and feasible. Mitigation may also include: • Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's planning Capital Projects. • Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project. Alternative Mitigation Measures: 7106.7.3 states that if traditional mitigation measures such as roadway widening and intersection improvements are infeasible as determined by ACHD, the TIS may recommend alternative mitigation measures. Alternative mitigation measures shall demonstrate that impacts from the project will be offset. • If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are programmed as funded in the Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP) or the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP); no alternative mitigation is required. • If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are not programmed in either the IFYWP or the CIP; the applicant may (i) analyze the shoulder hour and (ii) provide a safety analysis to determine alternative mitigation requirements. o If the impacted roadway segments and intersections meet the minimum acceptable level of service planning thresholds in the shoulder hour the 3 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 applicant may suggest feasible alternative mitigation such as: sidewalks, bike facilities, connectivity, safety improvements, etc. within 1.5 miles of the proposed development. o If the shoulder hour planning thresholds are exceeded the applicant may request to enter into a Development Agreement and pay into the Priority Corridor Fund an amount determined by the ACHD to offset impacts from the project. • Alternative Mitigation may also include: o Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's future Capital Projects. o Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project. Level of Service Planning Thresholds: District Policy 7206.4.1 states that, Level of Service Planning Thresholds have been established for principal arterials and minor arterials within ACHD's Capital Improvement Plan and are also listed in section 7106. Unless otherwise required to provide a Traffic Impact Study under section 7106, a proposed development with site traffic less than 10% of the existing downstream roadway or intersection peak hour traffic shall not be required to provide mitigation for a roadway or intersection that currently exceeds the minimum acceptable level of service planning threshold or V/C ratio. Average Daily Traffic(ADT): District Policy 7207.3.1 states that ADT on new and existing local streets should typically be less than 2,000. This ADT applies to both existing and new streets. For new streets that are stubbed to connect to adjacent land that is not fully developed, the allowable ADT for the new street will typically be no more than 1,000 ADT, to accommodate future additional traffic from the adjacent land, depending on the location and type of the stub street and the location and size of the adjacent undeveloped land. When stub streets are connected and properties fully developed, local streets should not exceed 2,000 ADT. Maximum Traffic on One Access: District Policy 7207.3.3 states that if a proposed development only has one access to a public street that is a local street, or if it proposes to extend public streets from existing development with only local street access to the public street system, the maximum forecast ADT (Average Daily Trips) to be allowed at any point on the local street access is 1,000 and is subject to fire department requirements for the provision of a secondary access. This volume may be reduced or increased based on information received from the lead land use agency, the applicable fire department, and/or emergency services. The District will also take into consideration the following items when determining whether or not to reduce or increase the maximum allowable ADT: railroad crossings, canal crossings, topography, pedestrian connectivity, location of schools, etc. b. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study (TIS) and generally agrees with the findings and recommendations. The following sections list the recommended improvements required by ACHD with this development based on the study and District policy. 1. Site Access A, B, and C: The TIS was originally completed with scenarios including Site Access B, which is taken from Ustick Road, and Site Access C, which is taken from McDermott Road. However, due to right-of-way acquisition and construction of SH-16/relocation of McDermott Road, Access A, taken from Achievement Street, will likely be the only residential access at the time of total buildout for this development. ITD has indicated that they will not allow any access to 4 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 the development to be taken across ITD right-of-way, eliminating the possibility of the residential portion accessing Access C on McDermott Road. Future residential access from Ustick Road is possible, however this will not be constructed until the parcel directly to the south of the site is developed in the future. A traffic impact study was submitted and reviewed by ACHD for the McDermott Village development on the parcel in 2020. It is uncertain when this development will proceed. ACHD will require that the Ustick Road/Site Access B intersection may be allowed as a temporary full access, but will ultimately be limited to right-in/right-out only with the McDermott Village development due to its proximity to SH-16. Staff requested that the Ustick Road/Site Access B intersection be analyzed as a right-in/right-out only intersection. Analysis by Kittelson &Associates, Inc. indicated that this intersection meets all LOS thresholds for 2025 total traffic conditions. Due to the uncertainty of Site Accesses B and C, ACHD requested analysis of an additional scenario in which Site Access A from Achievement Street is the only access to the residential portion of the development.All intersections operate within LOS thresholds under 2025 total traffic conditions for this scenario. The TIS indicates that the average daily trips for the western portion of the site will be 1,247 for 2025 full buildout. The industrial portion of the development is not included, as it will take all access from McDermott Road. Because all residential access will be taken from Site Access A until McDermott Village is developed at a later date, this exceeds ACHD's Maximum Traffic on One Access Policy which states that if a proposed development only has one access to a public street that is a local street, the maximum forecast ADT (Average Daily Trips) to be allowed at any point on the local street access is 1,000. The development will be restricted to 1,000 ADT until a second access is provided to another public road. The City of Meridian and Meridian Fire Department are both supportive of limiting ADT to 1,000 on this access. 2. Ustick Road/McDermott Road Intersection: The Ustick Road/McDermott Road intersection exceeds LOS thresholds for 2025 background traffic conditions with the existing all-way STOP control. When the intersection was analyzed as a 3x3 signalized intersection in the TIS, it was within all LOS thresholds. However, current plans from ITD indicate that the existing intersection of Ustick Road McDermott Road will be removed and McDermott Road will be realigned to the east where it will intersect with Ustick Road. ITD is currently acquiring right-of-way for SH-16 and has indicated that construction on SH-16 could start as early as Spring of 2022 and be underway by the expected 2025 buildout date for Aviator Springs. Therefore, staff recommends that mitigation not be required at the existing Ustick Road/ McDermott Road intersection. 5 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 _71r'= - �D - r 1 777 -r' McDermott Road to be removed McDermott Road new McDermott Road new ;is alignment t alignment , i T a 3. Ustick Road/Owyhee Storm Avenue Intersection: The Ustick Road/Owyhee Storm Avenue intersection meets all LOS thresholds for 2025 total traffic conditions in all presented scenarios. This intersection has been constructed with a 3x3 traffic signal as part of the Owyhee High School development. Staff recommends no additional improvements/mitigations be constructed with this development. 4. Owyhee Storm Avenue/Achievement Street Intersection: The Owyhee Storm Avenue/Achievement Street Intersection meets all LOS thresholds for 2025 total traffic conditions in all presented scenarios. This intersection has been constructed with a two-way STOP controlled intersection as part of the Owyhee High School development. Staff recommends no additional improvements/mitigations be constructed with this development. 5. McMillan Road/Owyhee Storm Avenue Intersection: The McMillan Road/Owyhee Storm Avenue Intersection meets all LOS thresholds for 2025 total traffic conditions in all presented scenarios. Supplemental analysis of the Owyhee High School TIS by ACHD in February 2020 determined a traffic signal is warranted at this intersection, despite not being required with the original development application. In accordance with this analysis, the intersection has been constructed with a 3x3 traffic signal as part of the Owyhee High School development. Staff recommends no additional improvements/mitigations be constructed with this development. 6. McDermott Road/Industrial Driveways: The applicant has proposed that both driveways from the industrial portion of the development on to McDermott Road will be two-way STOP controlled intersections. Turn lanes are not warranted for these intersections. This proposal meets all LOS thresholds in 6 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 all presented scenarios, and staff recommends no additional improvements/mitigations be constructed with this development. 7. Ustick Road Roadway Segment: Ustick Road between McDermott Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue is a 2-lane Principal Arterial with an acceptable LOS threshold of "E", which is 690 VPH, under the existing conditions and 2025 background conditions. The study shows this segment of Ustick Road exceeding LOS thresholds for a 2-lane Principal Arterial under the 2025 total conditions in the PM peak hour. However, the 3x3 traffic signal left-turn at the Ustick Road/Owyhee Storm Avenue intersection raises the LOS threshold of this segment of Ustick Road to 880 VPH for a 2-lane Principal Arterial road with left-turn lanes at major intersections. Therefore, this segment of Ustick Road meets this LOS threshold for 2025 total traffic conditions in all presented scenarios under the 2025 total traffic conditions. Staff recommends no further improvements/ mitigations be constructed with this development due to these reasons and the construction of SH-16 in the near future. 8. Owyhee Storm Avenue and Achievement Street Roadway Segments: The Owyhee Storm Avenue and Achievement Street Roadway segments both meet all LOS thresholds for 2025 total traffic conditions in all presented scenarios. Both roadways have been constructed as two-lane collector roadways as part of the Owyhee High School development. Staff recommends no additional improvements/mitigations be constructed with this development. 2. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Functional PM Peak PM Peak Existing Roadway Frontage Classification Hour Hour Level Plus Traffic Count of Service Project Ustick Road 0-feet Principal 385 Better than 735 Arterial "E" McDermott Road 1,315-feet Collector N/A N/A 245 • Acceptable level of service for a two-lane principal arterial is "E" (690 VPH). • Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH). 3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. • The average daily traffic count for Ustick Road east of Star Road was 4,780 on 04/25/18. • There are no current traffic counts for this section of McDermott Road C. Findings for Consideration 1. SH-16 Extension The Idaho Transportation Department is in the process of designing the Idaho 16, 1-84 to South Emmett Corridor. The project is planned to extend SH- 16 south from Idaho 44 (State Street) to connect to 1-84 between Nampa and Meridian. As western Ada County and eastern Canyon County develop, the ability to move traffic north-south is a primary concern. A connection between the highways requires a new crossing over the Boise River. Access options for 1-84 are limited by the existing Garrity Interchange west of McDermott Road and the Ten Mile Road Interchange to the east. This project is anticipated to greatly improve north-south mobility in western Ada County and eastern Canyon County. 7 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 2. McDermott Road a. Existing Conditions: McDermott Road is improved with 2-travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 55-feet of right-of-way for McDermott Road (22-feet from centerline). b. Policy: Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right- of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of-curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of McDermott Road is designated in the MSM as a 3-lane roadway, a 46-foot street section within 74-feet of right-of-way. Due to the SH-16 extension sidewalk is required on only the east side of the roadway. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks on McDermott Road abutting the site. 8 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant should dedicate additional right-of-way to total a minimum of 30-feet from the centerline of McDermott Road abutting the site. The applicant should improve McDermott Road abutting the site as'/2 of a 46-foot wide street section with curb, gutter and a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located behind the proposed bio swale matching the improvements required for Chukar Rudge to the north. The sidewalk should be located a minimum of 30-feet from the centerline of McDermott Road. For detached sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way, the applicant may reduce the right-of-way width to 2-feet behind the back of curb and provide a permanent right-of-way easement for the sidewalk. This segment of McDermott Road is not listed in the CIP or the IFYWP, as such no compensation will be provided for the additional right-of-way dedication. 3. Internal Local Roads a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing local roads within the site. There are two local roads under construction, Keklik Avenue and Alameda Creek Avenue, that will stub into the site's north property line. b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 47-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). Standard Urban Local Street-33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of- curb)for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within 47-feet of right-of-way. For the City of Kuna and City of Star: Unless otherwise approved by Kuna or Star, the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within 50-feet of right-of-way. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: • Reduces vehicle miles traveled. • Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. • Increases access for emergency services. • Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system. • Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. • Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. • Promotes orderly development. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, 9 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Half Street Policy: District Policy 7207.2.2 required improvements shall consist of pavement widening to one-half the required width, including curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk (minimum 5-feet), plus 12-feet of additional pavement widening beyond the centerline established for the street to provide an adequate roadway surface, with the pavement crowned at the ultimate centerline. A 3-foot wide gravel shoulder and a borrow ditch sized to accommodate the roadway storm runoff shall be constructed on the unimproved side. Cul-de-sac Streets Policy: District policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 50-feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29-foot street section is constructed around the island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from the appropriate fire department for this design element. The District will consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. • The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. 10 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to extend Keklik Avenue and Alameda Creek Avenue into the site and construct all internal local roads as 33-foot wide local street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks within 47-feet of right- of-way. The applicant has proposed to construct cul-de-sacs with turnaround radiuses of 48-feet at the terminuses of proposed Street E and Street F. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to extend Keklik Avenue and Alameda Creek Avenue into the site and construct all internal local roads as 33-foot wide street sections meets District policy and should be approved as proposed. The proposed cul-de-sacs at the terminuses of Street E and Street F do not meet District cul- de-sac policy, which requires a minimum turning radius of 50-feet. The applicant should be required to construct the cul-de-sacs at the terminuses of Street E and Street F with a turning radius of 50-feet. If street trees are desired, an 8-foot wide planter strip is required. The applicant should be required to dedicate additional right-of-way to total 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk or provide a permanent right-of-way easement for sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way. 4. Roadway Offsets a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing roadways within the site. b. Policy: Local Offset Policy: District policy 7207.4.2, requires local roadways to align or provide a minimum offset of 125-feet from any other street (measured centerline to centerline). c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct all local roads internally with a minimum of 125-foot offset. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved as proposed. 5. Stub Streets a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing stub streets within the site. There are two stub streets, Keklik Avenue and Alameda Creek Avenue, stubbed to the site's north property line. b. Policy: Stub Street Policy: District policy 7207.2.4.3 states that stub streets will be required to provide circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7207.2.4, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE." In addition, stub streets must meet the following conditions: • A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the nearest street intersection within the proposed development and drain surface water towards that intersection; unless an alternative storm drain system is approved by the District. • The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will remain free of obstructions. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a stub street to the south property line located 68-feet west of the ITD right-of-way for SH-16. The stub street is less than 150-feet in length. 11 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WIL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE." Because the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in length, a temporary turnaround is note required. 6. Driveways 6.1 McDermott Road a. Existing Conditions: There is an existing 12-foot wide unpaved driveway from the site on to McDermott Road located 618-feet north of the site's south property line. b. Policy: Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use agency.Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops. District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at bicycle and bus routes. Driveway Location Policy (Stop Controlled Intersection): District policy 7206.4.4 requires driveways located on collector roadways near a STOP controlled intersection to be located outside of the area of influence; OR a minimum of 150-feet from the intersection, whichever is greater. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline of the driveway. Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD to align or offset a minimum of 245-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high- volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to close the existing driveway from the site on to McDermott Road with vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk. The applicant has proposed the construction of 2 new driveways from the site on to McDermott Road: • A 25-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 172-feet north of the site's south property line. • A 25-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 933-feet north of the site's south property line. 12 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved as proposed. 6.2 Internal Local Street D a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways within the site. b. Policy: Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7207.4.1 requires driveways near intersections to be located a minimum of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centerline) from the nearest local street intersection, and 150-feet from the nearest collector or arterial street intersection. Successive Driveways: District Policy 7207.4.1 states that successive driveways away from an intersection shall have no minimum spacing requirements for access points along a local street, but the District does encourage shared access points where appropriate. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7207.4.3 states that where vertical curbs are required, residential driveways shall be restricted to a maximum width of 20-feet and may be constructed as curb-cut type driveways. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct 3 driveways on to Street D: • A 25-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 160-feet south of Street F. • A 25-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 324-feet south of Street F. • A 25-foot wide paved curb-return type driveway located 452-feet south of Street F. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: All 3 driveways in the applicant's proposal meet District policy and should be approved as proposed. 7. Maximum Traffic on One Access a. Policy: Maximum Traffic on One Access: District Policy 7207.3.3 states that if a proposed development only has one access to a public street that is a local street, or if it proposes to extend public streets from existing development with only local street access to the public street system, the maximum forecast ADT (Average Daily Trips) to be allowed at any point on the local street access is 1,000 and is subject to fire department requirements for the provision of a secondary access. This volume may be reduced or increased based on information received from the lead land use agency, the applicable fire department, and/or emergency services. The District will also take into consideration the following items when determining whether or not to reduce or increase the maximum allowable ADT: railroad crossings, canal crossings, topography, pedestrian connectivity, location of schools, etc. b. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The TIS indicates that the average daily trips for the western portion of the site will be 1,247 for 2025 full buildout. The industrial portion of the development is not included, as it will take all access from McDermott Road. Because all access to the western portion of the site will be taken from Site Access A until McDermott Village is developed at a later date, this exceeds ACHD's Maximum Traffic on One Access Policy which states that if a proposed development only has one access to a public street that is a local street, the maximum forecast ADT (Average Daily Trips) to be allowed at any point on the local street access is 1,000. The development will be restricted to 1,000 ADT until a second access is provided to another public road. The City of Meridian and Meridian Fire Department are both supportive of limiting ADT to 1,000 on this access. 13 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 To ensure this development (the western portion of the site) is limited to less than 1,000 trips per day, staff recommends that this development be limited to the final platting of the 96 proposed single family building lots or to the lot set aside for the Boys and Girls Club and 84 residential lots. Both scenarios do not include the LDS seminary building, as it will not create a significant number of trips due to the fact that students will primarily be walking between Owyhee High School and the seminary building. 8. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 9. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 10. Other Access McDermott Road is classified as collector roadway. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to these roadways and should be noted on the final plat. D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Take all access to the western portion of the development from Site Access A at Achievement Street. 2. Limit ADT to 1,000 for the western portion of the development until a second access is constructed by limiting final platting to either 96 residential lots or the lot set aside for the Boys and Girls Club and 84 residential lots. 3. Dedicate additional right-of-way to total 30-feet from the centerline of McDermott Road. 4. Construct McDermott Road as '/2 of a 46-foot street section with vertical curb and gutter abutting the site matching the improvements being constructed by Chukar Ridge to the north. 5. Extend Keklik Avenue and Alameda Creek Avenue into the site, as proposed. 6. Construct all internal local roads as 33-foot local street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks within 47-feet of right-of-way. 7. Construct to cul-de-sacs at the terminuses of Street E and Street F with turnaround radiuses a minimum of 50-feet. 8. If street trees are desired, an 8-foot planter strip is required. 9. For detached sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way, the applicant may provide a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. 10. Construct a stub street to the south property line located 68-feet west of the ITD right-of-way for SH-16. Install a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating that, ""THIS ROAD WIL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE." 14 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 11. Close the existing driveway from the site on to McDermott Road located 618-feet north of the site's south property line. 12. Construct two paved curb-return type driveways from the site on to McDermott Road, located 172- feet north and 933-feet north of the site's south property line. 13. Construct three paved curb-return type driveways on to Street D located 160-feet south, 324-feet south, and 452-feet south of Street F. 14. Submit civil plans to ACHD Development Services for review and approval. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD. 15. Payment of impact fees is due prior to issuance of a building permit. 16. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). 2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non- compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number)for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled)are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 15 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. TIS Executive Summary 4. COMPASS Development Checklist 5. Utility Coordinating Council 6. Development Process Checklist 7. Appeal Guidelines 16 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 VICINITY MAP jr, r l I- -- __ r W 81,v-k r , C.r rtrk I�r -dw } Vj ItlZrk FJc4�+r: fW{'r,}rr{f .' a - rl t;rrtlt Ii.ipitlti Or � } ti. W 1'•1�kuIIux -41t Bc c.ky Ur w W Knsl.rlcrt i Lrr ;• w Eudelvor Sl } �" 8 ... -- 1 _--- - _— Ia 17 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 SITE PLAN I � I I ' I 11 a I II I �I I I I I I ' I I I r.. .,... � -x.... " wGp4K6i'a • � I 11 • �luul ,yw Fl i # _ l� + ' l 1 .. �411ti 1 amuvb; fikl -fM.r .. I _ I I I I I IIE { I R iI -'T 7 ,tv.. I 1� —_ m ' � u1� ��} Ir— Iria�_ kHs 1 1•= 1 I I6 I Y 1 I � • lamlrr nuns ���••- --i__��� I �� I I ssaiu I a I I _ I PrWimlasry PIS#-Overview ' 18 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 TIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aviator Springs Development TIS May 2021 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kittelson &Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) has prepared a Transportation Impact Study(TIS)for the Aviator Springs Development. The Aviator Springs Development is located to the northwest of the Ustick Road and McDermott Road intersection next to the new Owyhee High School within the City of Meridian area of influence.The proposed site is currently vacant farmland and consists of approximately 40 acres.The development plan proposes to build 96 single family houses, a 4,360 square foot Church of Latter-Day Saints (LDS)Seminary, a 5,580 square foot Boys and Girls Club or after school program building, and a 20,000 square foot research and development facility.The anticipated buildout year is 2025. The TIS resulted in the following findings and recommendations. FINDINGS Existing Conditions • All study intersections were found to operate at acceptable operating standards during the existing weekday AM and PM peak hours. • All study roadway segments operate within the ACHD volume threshold under existing conditions. Year 2025 Background Traffic Conditions • Year 2025 background traffic volumes were forecast using a 2-percent compounded annual growth rate on all roadways plus in process traffic of other approved developments within the site vicinity. • Year 2025 background traffic analysis (without inclusion of site-generated traffic)found that all study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable operating standards during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the exceptions of: o McDermott Road&Ustick Road(AM and PM Peak Hours) ■ The eastbound movement experiences long delays resulting in LOS F during both peak hours.The westbound movement experiences long delays resulting in LOS F during PM peak hour only. These movements operate over capacity exceeding ACHD's operating standards. While under capacity at V/C of 0.93 and 0.95, the westbound and northbound movements experience relatively long delays resulting in LOS E during AM and PM peak hours,respectively. ■ ACHD identified signalizing this intersection by 2025. Adding a signal at the intersection brings the intersection operations into compliance under background conditions. 1WA 8 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. NNI 19 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Aviator Springs Development TIS May 2021 Executive Summary o Ustick Road&Site Access B(AM and PM Peak Hours) ■ The southbound movement from Site Access B experiences relatively long delays waiting for gaps in traffic on Ustick Road resulting in LOS E. However, it is not recommended to signalize this intersection for the following reasons: • Per ACHD access considerations and requirements,the optimum spacing for new signalized collector roadways intersecting minor arterials is one half-mile.The nearest signalized intersection at Owyhee Storm Avenue is approximately 1320 feet,less than half-mile west of the Site Access B. • The southbound movement operates well under capacity(V/C of 0.64 and 0.59)during both Weekday AM and PM peak hours,respectively. • Relatively long delays from a site access road onto a major road (Ustick Road)is expected. • All study roadway segments operate within the ACHD volume threshold under year 2025 background traffic conditions. Trip Generation • The development plan proposes to build 96 single family houses, a lot set aside for a Church of Latter-Day Saints(LDS)Seminary,a lot set aside for a Boys and Girls Club or after school program building,and a research and development facility. • The development is estimated to generate a total of 1,381 daily net new trip ends,of these 136 are estimated to occur in the weekday a.m. peak hour(56 inbound/80 outbound),and 161 are estimated to occur in the weekday p.m. peak hour(88 inbound/73 outbound). Year 2025 Total Traffic Conditions • Year 2025 total traffic conditions found that the site generated trips did not impact any additional intersections not previously identified in the background traffic conditions.This TIS assumed and analyzed the following three access point scenarios under year 2025 total traffic conditions. o Scenario 1:Accesses to Achievement Avenue and Ustick Road o Scenario 2:Accesses to Achievement Avenue and McDermott Road, o Scenario 3:Accesses to Achievement Avenue, Ustick Road,and McDermott Road. • All findings and mitigations required for intersections to meet operational standards outlined under background conditions remain consistent in the year 2025 total traffic conditions for all three scenarios. • All study roadway segments operate within the ACHD volume threshold under total conditions. I9 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. NNI 20 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Aviator Springs Development T IS May 2021 Executive Summary Site Access Evaluation • The turn lane analysis using ACHD procedures resulted in turn lane warrants at no site access streets,except for those already assumed under previous TIS studies. • The intersection sight distance evaluation identified that intersection sight distance can be achieved at all the site intersections. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the report's analyses and evaluation findings, recommendations were developed accordingly for time scenario's conditions. Year 2025 Background Traffic Condition Mitigations (Without the Proposed Development) • Ustick Road/McDermott Road: o The following mitigation at the Ustick Road/McDermott Road intersection is recommended to meet agency standards: ■ Signalization of the intersection, including the addition of exclusive left-turn lanes at all approaches. ■ ACHD will be installing the signal in the interim. The temporary signal would be in place until the construction of the SH 16 extension and SH 16 / Ustick Road interchange. Additional Year 2025 Mitigations Needed with the Aviator Springs Development No mitigations beyond those presented for background conditions are recommended to accommodate the year 2025 total traffic volumes. All Site Accesses Construct all accesses to the development with the following designations: ■ All local streets within the development should be constructed with one travel lane in each direction. ■ Site driveways with access to public streets should provide sufficient stacking distance for four vehicles(100 feet)to ensure acceptable operation and accommodate larger vehicles,including utility service and delivery vehicles. ■ Site accesses along McDermott Road should match the existing grade or be higher at the intersection to ensure the best possible sight distance. 110 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. 21 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Aviator Springs Development TIS May 2021 Executive Summary ■ All accesses and internal streets should be designed to provide adequate intersection site distance.Shrubbery and landscaping near the intersection and site access point should be maintained to ensure adequate sight distance is maintained. ■ Site accesses are assumed to match the existing grade of the connected roadway at the intersection and back at least one car length. Significant changes to the approach grade could impact the sight distances. ■ Shrubbery,weeds,and landscaping near the internal intersections and site access points should be maintained to ensure adequate sight distance. ■ If widening occurs along any of the site access road, care should be taken to ensure adequate grades and intersection sight distance is maintained. 111 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. 22 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 COMPASS DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 Development Review The Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Ada and Canyon Counties. COMPASS has developed this review as a tool for local governments to evaluate whether land developments are consistent with the goals of Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 (CIM 2040), the regional long-range transportation plan for Ada and Canyon Counties. This checklist is not intended to be prescriptive, but rather a guidance document based on CIM 2040 2.0 goals. Development Name: Aviator Springs Agency: Meridian CIM Vision Category: Future Neighborhoods New households: 93 New jobs: ±25 Exceeds CIM forecast: No CIM Corridor: None Level of Stress considers facility type, number of vehicle Pedestrian level of stress: N/A lanes, and speed. Roads with G or PG ratings better Bicycle level of stress: N/A support bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and comfort levels. Housing within 1 mile: 520 , A good jobs/housing balance -a ratio between 1 and Jobs within 1 mile: 130 1.5 -reduces traffic congestion. Higher numbers Jobs/Housing Ratio: 0.2 indicate the need for more housing and lower numbers indicate an employment need. Nearest police station: ]4 miles Developments within 1.5 miles of police and fire Nearest fire station: ]4 miles stations ensure that emergency services are more efficient and reduce the cost of these important public services. Farmland consumed: Yes Farmland contributes to the local economy, creates Farmland within 1 mile: 1,169 acres additional jobs, and provides food security to the region. Development in farm areas decreases the productivity and sustainability of farmland. i Nearest bus stop: 3.3 miles =.� Residents who live or work less than +/z mile from W Nearest public school: 0.1 miles critical services have more transportation choices. Nearest public park: 1.8 miles Walking and biking reduces congestion by taking cars off nmwl Nearest grocery store: 3.3 miles the road, while supporting a healthy and active lifestyle. Recommendations State Highway 16 is the #4 priority in the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 plan. State Highway 16 serves as the main commuter route from Gem County to the Treasure Valley. State Highway 16 is the #4 priority in the Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 plan. State Highway 16 serves as the main commuter route from Gem County to the Treasure Valley. Idaho Transportation Department has programmed funding for preliminary engineering and right-of-way acquisition on SH-16 between I-84 and US 20/26 (FY2021- 2027 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Key Number 20788). Current documents show construction as unfunded; however, ITD now has State funding for construction of Phase 2, which will build the entire corridor with at-grade intersections. The construction funds are expected to be added to the programs this fall. Design for Phase 3, was recently added to design the interchanges for this segment; however, funding is not yet available to construct the interchanges. This location is not served by bus routes and ValleyConnect 2.0 does not plan for public transportation to this site. More information about COMPASS and Communities in Motion 2040 2.0: Web:www.compassidaho.org Email info@compassidaho.ora SI I C O M PASS More information about the development review process: a COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION http://www.compassidaho.ora/dashboard/dgvreview.htm ' or southwest Idaho 23 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Roadway and ■ ■ Improvements, Part 3, Boise Area I Regionally Significant: ❑ 0 Inflated COMPASS PM: Federal PM: Key*: 22927 Maintenance Requesting Agency:ACHE A(gun Project Year: 2027 Total Previous Expenditures: $0 Total Programmed Cost: $387 ' " Total Cost(Prev. +Prog.): $387 Project Description: Supplement the local pavement preservation program to complete pavement improvements on federal-aid roadways in the Boise Urbanized Area Work includes improvements to adjoining sidewalks to meetAmerican's with Disabilities Act(ADA)requirements.This project could convert to federal-aid if funds become available Segments will be determined prior to the obligation in the the design year. F wy-Local Local Match 100.00% Cost Preliminary Preliminary Right-of-Way Utilities Construction Construction Total I Federal Share Local Share Year` Engineering Engineering Engineering Consulting 2025 5 76 0 0 0 0 I 81 I 0 81 2027 0 0 0 0 0 305 305 0 305 Fund $5 $76 $0 $0 $0 $306 $387 $0 $387 Totals: SH-16, 11-84 to US 20126 d. and Canyon Countiesf2 — Regionally Significant: ® © Inflated COMPASS PM: Federal PM:Key#: 20788 SupportRequesting Agency: ITD Project Year: 2019-2021 Ut T� Total Previous Expenditures: $91,140 s �' Meridan Total Programmed Cost: $7,500 Total Cost(Prev. +Prog.): $98,640 N .p Project Description: Preliminary engineering and right-of-way acquisition only on State Highway 16 717 between Interstate 84 and US Highway 20126(Chinden Boulevard)and State T Highway 44(State Street)in Ada and Canyon Counties.Funds will be used to update the environmental re-evaluation, preliminary design through final design,and right-of-way acquisition.(Right-of-way is partially funded and construction is considered"unfunded") Funding Source IM Program =Hwy-Rest Local Matchl Match 7. Cost Preliminary Preliminary Right-of-Waq Utilities Construction Construction T otal Federal Share Local Share Years Engineering Engineering Engineering ` Consulting 2021 0 0 7,500 0 0 00 1,5000 5,950 551551 Fund $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500 $6,950 $661 Totals: 'PD-Preliminary Development(projects with developmentactivity Sorted by Project Name P age 61 of94 but no programmed year of construction) All Values in Thousands of Dollars Monday,April 05,2021 124 2:22 PM 24 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Fiscal Impact Analysis Supplemental for the Development Review Checklist The purpose of the fiscal impact analysis is to better estimate expected revenues and costs to local governments as a result of new development so that the public, stakeholders, and the decision- makers can better manage growth. Capital and operating expenditures are determined by various factors that determine service and infrastructure needs, including persons per household, student generation rates, lot sizes, street frontages, vehicle trip and trip adjustment factors, average trip lengths, construction values, income, discretionary spending, and employment densities. The COMPASS Development Checklist considers the level of fiscal benefits, how many public agencies benefit or are burdened by additional growth, and how long the proposal will take to achieve a fiscal break-even point, if at all. More information about the COMPASS Fiscal Impact Tool is available at: www.compassidaho.org/prodserv/fiscalimpact.htm. • Overall Net Fiscal Impact Net Fiscal Impact, by Agency City O County O✓ Highway District is School District • Break Even: 5 Years 25 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5)working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to:50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for e-mail notification information. 26 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ❑Send a"No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Items to be completed by Applicant: ❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD,then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services(ACHD)for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to,driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request"form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ❑Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application"to ACHD Construction—Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ❑ Sediment&Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion &Sediment Control Narrative&Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. ❑ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ❑ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con. 27 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary and Clerk of the District, which must be filed within ten (10)working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 28 DRAFT Aviator Springs/ MPP21-0011/ AZ-2021-0065