HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Comments
RE"C-E-I~------'-'-""""""
FER fj 9 lOGo
CITY OF ME.RIDIA~~
CI-r-Y €-' L°-K--ÇIFFICr::-",-,."-,-""..,,
--' c-c-T'-, . '-- "
-~~~
Right-ol-TlIay & Development Department
Planning Review Division
----------.--,,---"-----
Committed to
-----,----"...."......,,"-
-------,-,-,-.., ------------------------
,.._----------,------------------.. ........"-,---
---------- ,,",......,,-,--------
Project/File:
Gateway Marketplace-MPP-O6-002
Lead Agency:
City of Meridian
[Q)
œ
&
[?
lJ
Site address:
Southeast corner of Ustick Road & SH-55
Staff Level
Approval:
x
Applicant:
Landmark Development Group LLC
1882 Toluka Way
Boise, 10 83712
Owner:
James A. Kissler
1125 W. Amity Road
Boise, 10 83705
Staff Contact:
Christy Richardson
Phone: 387-6178
E-mail: crichardson achd.ada.id.us
Tech Review:
February 3, 2006
Application Information:
Acreage: 22.85-acres
Current Zoning: C-G
Proposal: 23 commercial lot subdivision
A. Findings of Fact
Existing Conditions
1.
Site Information: The site is currently vacant.
2.
Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction Land Use Zoning
North Commercial (Lowes) C-G
South Undeveloped C-G
East Undeveloped (rezone in process to C-G) RUT
West Undeveloped C-G
1
Development Impacts
3.
Trip Generation:
This development is estimated to generate x additional vehicle trips per
day (0 existing) based on the submitted traffic impact study.
4.
Impact Fees:
There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee
ordinance that is in effect at that time.
5.
Traffic Impact Study:
summary is noted below.
A traffic impact study was required with this application and the
6.
Impacted Roadways:
Roadway Frontage Functional Traffic Count Speed
Classification Limit
Ustick Road None Minor Arterial 10,833 on 8-5-3 w/o 40 MPH
Eagle Road
Eagle Road Principal 41 ,939 on 1-6-05 n/o
995' Arterial/State 50 MPH
(SH-55) Hiqhwav Fairview Avenue
*Acceptable level of service for a two lane collector roadway is "0" (9,500 VTD).
7.
Other Development in Area/Miscellaneous
. ACHO reviewed this site as part of a rezone and annexation application, MAZ03-0018.
. ACHO has reviewed and approved MCUP05-0048, the application for the Kohl's Department
Store at the northwest corner of Ustick Road and SH-55.
. ACHD has received an application for Bienville Square at the southwest corner of Ustick Road
and SH-55, a mixed-use development. That application is on hold while the applicant revises the
site plan.
B. Findings for Consideration
1.
Ustick Road
Ustick Road, from Leslie Drive to Ally Street, including the Eagle Road intersection, has just been
widened and improved to 5-lanes. Sidewalks were not constructed with the roadway improvement
project, but are required to be constructed as development occurs on the undeveloped properties.
The intersection was widened to include dual left turning lanes. This project was a public/private
partnership that involved other land owners and developers in the area.
The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Ustick
Road. Provide a sidewalk easement for sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way.
2.
Ustick Road Driveways
Offset Policy:
. District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed
limit of 40 to align or offset a minimum of 185-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
. District policy requires driveways to be located a minimum of 440-feet from signalized
intersections for full access, and 220-feet from signalized intersections for restricted right-in/right-
out access.
2
2.
3.
3
Width Policy: District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over
1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as
curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be
required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to
gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant
should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the
edge of pavement of the roadway.
Applicant Proposal
. The applicant is proposing to construct a right-in/right-out driveway on Ustick Road located
approximately 350-feet east of SH-55. There is a median in the center of the roadway to restrict
the access.
.
The applicant is proposing to construct a full access driveway on Ustick Road located
approximately 700-feet east of SH-55.
Staff Comment/Recommendation
. The driveways should be approved as proposed, in accordance with District policy.
3.
Cross Access
The applicant is not proposing to provide any cross access to the parcel to the east. That parcel is
currently under consideration for annexation and rezone to the City of Meridian, and has only 330-
feet of frontage (Una Mas parcel). Further to the east is a 5-acre parcel owned by ACHD and also
currently under consideration for annexation and rezone to the City of Meridian. ACHD acquired
that property with the intent that a north-south roadway would be constructed in the future at the
signalized intersection with Ally Way. In December 2005, the ACHO Commission approved the
designation of that roadway as a collector from Ustick Road to Fairview Avenue, along with an east-
west mid-mile collector to connect to SH-55. (See map.)
This site could have access to a signalized roadway (Ally Way) if sufficient cross access is provided
between property owners. Cross access should also be considered to the parcel to the south.
4.
Eagle Road Right-of-Way, Improvements and Access
The City of Meridian, applicant and ITD should work together to determine if additional right-of-way
or improvements are necessary on Eagle Road (SH-55). Access points should be approved in
accordance with the Eagle Road Corridor Study.
C. Site Specific Conditions of AIDJroval
1.
Re-construct the northern driveway, on the adjacent flag lot, as a curb return driveway with
minimum 15-foot curb radii. This driveway shall be no wider than 30-feet.
Construct one new curb return driveway with minimum 15-foot curb radii located approximately 120-
feet north of the south property line as proposed on the revised site plan. This driveway shall be no
wider than 30-feet.
Close the existing curb cut driveway located approximately 96-feet south of the north property line
with curb, gutter, and sidewalk to match existing improvements.
13.
4
4.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of A[!proval
1.
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2.
Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or
right-of-way.
3.
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
4.
Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5.
Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
6.
Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
7.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
8.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
9.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
10.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
11.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-ofwway. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387w6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
12.
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at
the time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
1.
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Appeal Guidelines or Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
4. Development Process Checklist
5
6
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
1.
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties,
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by
all Commissioners present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later
than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting
following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the
request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next
scheduled regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth
new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that
has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact
or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the
meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD
staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the
matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a
meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1.
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an
error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
7
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the
Secretary of Highway Systems, Wllich must be filed within ten (10) working days from
the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer
to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone
number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written
summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law
relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The
Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the
provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission
hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the
appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to
be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS
Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the
notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1)
week prior to the hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part. or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
II
Development Process Checkl ist
II
ISISubmit a development application to a City or to the County
ISIThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
ISIThe ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
ISIThe Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
DSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time.
8
DSend a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part
of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also
apply to this development application.
lZIWrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating
the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
OWrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
DThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports.
DFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter:
. The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required
by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.)
. The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way,
including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
DPay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Zone)
0 Driveway or Property Approach(s)
. Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by
Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
D Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
. Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application"
to ACHD Construction - Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are
placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
D Sediment & Erosion Submittal
. At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan
Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction - Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage
Division.
0 Idaho Power Company
. Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
D Final Approval from Development Services
ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling a Pre-Con.
9