The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-10-15 ACHD Development Services Department AO CHD 'I 5iiae 60,-�a-v cII Project/File: Centerville Subdivision/ MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 This is an annexation and rezone application to annex 40.49 acres into the City of Meridian with a R-8, C-C and R-15 zoning and a preliminary plat application to develop 124 single-family lots, .35 79 townhome lots, four 4 plex buildings, '' mufti f,m:'„ '^+9 4 3 commercial lots and 27 common lots on 38.95 acres. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: 4111 E. Amity Road and 5200 S. Hillsdale Avenue Staff Approval: July 26, 2021, Updated October 15, 2021 updates are highlighted Applicant: Becky McKay Engineering Solutions, LLP Vicinity Map MIME!ZEN 1029 N. Rosario Street, Suite 100 � g� Meridian, ID 83642 r�► '°'' x V .MINI ..,�8 .�. — - ; ":s� I � Representative: Same as above _ _ I 'IrI., & 1a'l3IPlnBa$ f� '' Staff Contact: Paige Bankhead, E.I. k d':pie Phone: 387-6293 � �, % IO,,'.� II`61g".� E-mail: pbankhead(��achdidaho.org V� A. Findinqs of Fact 1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of an annexation and rezone application to annex 40.49 acres into the City of Meridian with a R-8, C-C and R-15 zoning and a preliminary plat application to develop 124 single-family lots, 35 79 townhome lots, four 4 plex buildings, 2 multi farnil„ at 4 3 commercial lots and 27 common lots on 38.95 acres. The City of Meridian's Future Land Use Plan designates this area as Old Town and Medium Density Residential. 2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction I Land Use Zoning North Medium Density Residential R-8 South Medium Density Residential R-8 East Medium Density Residential (City of Boise R-4 West Neighborhood Business C-N 3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the site: 1 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • Shelburne South Subdivision, 99 single-family lots and 19 common lots on 27.9 acres located directly north of the site and was approved by ACHD on December 23, 2019. 5. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site. 6. Pathway Crossings: United States Access Board R304.5.1.2 Shared Use Paths. In shared use paths, the width of curb ramps runs and blended transitions shall be equal to the width of the shared use path. AASHTO's Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities 5.3.5 Other Intersection Treatments: The opening of a shared use path at the roadway should be at least the same width as the shared use path itself. If a curb ramp is provided, the ramp should be the full width of the path, not including any flared sides if utilized. Detectable warnings should be placed across the full width of the ramp. FHWA's "Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access" (1999) reflected common ADA-related concepts: Chapter 6, Page 16-6: The width of the ramp should be at least as wide as the average width of the trail to improve safety for users who will be traveling at various speeds. In addition, the overall width of the trail should be increased, so the curb ramp can be slightly offset to the side. The increased width reduces conflict at the intersection by providing more space for users at the bottom of the ramp. 7. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 1.10 centerline miles of new public road. 8. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD. 9. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP): • Eagle Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Amity Road to Victory Road in 2021-2022. • Cloverdale Road is schedule in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Amity Road to Victory Road in 2025. • The intersection of Eagle Road and Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be reconstructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 4-lanes on the north leg, 4-lanes on the south, 4-lanes east, and 4-lanes on the west leg and is currently under construction. • The intersection of Cloverdale Road and Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be reconstructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 4-lanes on the north leg, 4-lanes on the south leg, 4-lanes on the north leg, 2-Ianeson the east leg and 2-Ianeson the west leg in 2025. • Amity Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Eagle Road to Cloverdale Road between 2036 and 2040. 10. Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan: ACHD's Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan (BMP) was adopted by the ACHD Commission in May of 2009 and was update in 2018. The plan seeks to implement the Planned Bicycle Network to support bicycling as a viable transportation option for Ada County residents with a wide range of ages and abilities, maintain bicycle routes in a state of good repair in order to ensure they are consistently available for use, promote awareness of existing bicycle routes and features and support encouragement programs and to facilitate coordination and cooperation among local jurisdictions in implementing the Roadways to Bikeways Plan recommendations. • The BMP identifies Amity Road as a Level 3 facility that will be constructed as part of a future ACHD project. 2 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • The BMP identifies Hillsdale Avenue, a collector road, as a Level 1 facility. Hillsdale Avenue is currently striped with bike lanes on both sides of the road. B. Traffic Findings for Consideration 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 2,599 additional vehicle trips per day; 266 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour, based on the traffic impact study. 2. Traffic Impact Study CR Engineering, Inc. prepared a traffic impact study for the proposed Centerville Subdivision. An executive summary of the findings as presented by CR Engineering, Inc. can be found as Attachment 3. The executive summary is not the opinion of ACHD staff. ACHD has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study for consistency with ACHD policies and practices, and may have additional requirements beyond what is noted in the summary. ACHD Staff comments on the submitted traffic impact study can be found below under staff comments. y Rd 1 ( _ t v y i—� r. Ilill _ yytilti.�frct�icl a.. . FFark t = I1,411ing Ct � Fl. .LjliIliv SI 21 _ ..W,;,>1>7V tier w ru ?�:+ } e }Na ',.. _ i`,tnL �111� Gil �. Intersections (blue) and roadway segments (green) included in the study a. Policy Mitigation Proposals: Mitigation recommendations shall be provided within the report. At a minimum, for each roadway segment and intersection that does not meet the minimum acceptable level of service planning threshold or v/c ratio, the report must discuss feasible measures to avoid or reduce the impact to the system. To be considered adequate, measures should be specific and feasible. Mitigation may also include: • Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's planning Capital Projects. • Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project. Alternative Mitigation Measures: 7106.7.3 states that if traditional mitigation measures such as roadway widening and intersection improvements are infeasible as determined by ACHD, the TIS may recommend alternative mitigation measures. Alternative mitigation measures shall demonstrate that impacts from the project will be offset. 3 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are programmed as funded in the Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP) or the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP); no alternative mitigation is required. • If the impacted roadway segments and/or intersections are not programmed in either the IFYWP or the CIP; the applicant may (i) analyze the shoulder hour and (ii) provide a safety analysis to determine alternative mitigation requirements. o If the impacted roadway segments and intersections meet the minimum acceptable level of service planning thresholds in the shoulder hour the applicant may suggest feasible alternative mitigation such as: sidewalks, bike facilities, connectivity, safety improvements, etc. within 1.5 miles of the proposed development. o If the shoulder hour planning thresholds are exceeded the applicant may request to enter into a Development Agreement and pay into the Priority Corridor Fund an amount determined by the ACHD to offset impacts from the project. • Alternative Mitigation may also include: o Revision to the Phasing Plan to coincide with the District's future Capital Projects. o Reducing the scope and/or scale of the project. Level of Service Planning Thresholds: District Policy 7206.4.1 states that, Level of Service Planning Thresholds have been established for principal arterials and minor arterials within ACHD's Capital Improvement Plan and are also listed in section 7106. Unless otherwise required to provide a Traffic Impact Study under section 7106, a proposed development with site traffic less than 10% of the existing downstream roadway or intersection peak hour traffic shall not be required to provide mitigation for a roadway or intersection that currently exceeds the minimum acceptable level of service planning threshold or V/C ratio. b. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study (TIS) and generally agrees with the findings and recommendations. The table below summarizes the improvements required with the development based on the study and District Policy. The following sections summarize staffs recommendations based on the study's findings and recommendations. Summary of Improvements Re uired by ACHD Intersection Improvement Threshold Hillsdale Avenue/Amity Road Interim Signal 60 PM peak hour trips Amity Road/Amorita Avenue Dedicated eastbound right-turn With first phase of lane and westbound left-turn development lane Amity Road The study shows that Amity Road from Eagle Road to Cloverdale Roads exceeds ACHD LOS thresholds for a 2-lane arterial roadway in the PM peak hour, but meets thresholds for a 3-lane arterial roadway. This segment of Amity Road has center left turn lanes at all major subdivision access points, allowing the roadway to function as a 3-lane minor arterial roadway and meet LOS thresholds. However, the study shows that this segment of Amity Road will exceed the thresholds for a 3-lane arterial roadway under the 2025 background and total traffic conditions when 97 PM peak hour trips are added to the road segment from Eagle Road to the site access and 105 PM peak hour trips are added to the segment from the site access to Cloverdale Road. This roadway is constrained to 3-lanes based on the Master Street Map. 4 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 The peak hour site traffic for Amity Road between the site and Eagle Road is 9.9% of the 2025 total traffic, and 6.7% of the 2025 total traffic from the site to Cloverdale Road. District Policy for alternative mitigation measures states that if the site traffic is less than 10% of the total traffic conditions for intersections or roadways segments that exceed ACHD LOS thresholds, or the roadway segment or intersection is listed in the CIP then improvements are not required. In addition, it is infeasible for the applicant to widen this segment of Amity Road due to right-of- way constraints and the Master Street Map constrains this roadway to 3-lanes. Therefore, staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct any additional improvements to this segment of Amity Road with this development application. Eagle Road/Amity Road Intersection The intersection of Eagle Road and Amity Road is currently being improved by ACHD as a multi-lane roundabout with 4-lanes on each leg per the IFYWP. The study shows that the intersection will meet ACHD's LOS thresholds under the existing and 2025 background traffic conditions. The study recommends constructing a southbound right-turn lane at the intersection to mitigate the 2025 total traffic conditions. The peak hour site traffic at this intersection is 4.5% of the 2025 total traffic. District Policy for alternative mitigation measures states that if the site traffic is less than 10% of the total traffic conditions for an intersection or roadway segment that exceeds ACHD LOS thresholds, improvements are not required. Therefore, staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct any additional improvements to the intersection of Eagle Road/Amity Road with this development application. Cloverdale Road/Amity Road Intersection The study recommends reconstructing the intersection as a multi-lane roundabout or construct dedicated southbound and westbound right-turn lanes to mitigate the 2025 total traffic conditions. The peak hour site traffic at this intersection is 4.3% of the 2025 total traffic conditions and this intersection is listed in the IFYWP to be improved as a multi-lane roundabout in 2025. District Policy for alternative mitigation measures states that if the site traffic is less than 10% of the total traffic conditions for an intersection or roadway segment in the study that exceeds ACHD LOS thresholds or the intersection or roadway segment is listed in the CIP or IFYWP, improvements are not required. Therefore, staff does not recommend that the applicant be required to construct any additional improvements to the intersection of Cloverdale Road/Amity Road with this development application. Hillsdale Avenue/Amity Road The study recommends signalizing the intersection of Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road, or reconstructing the intersection as a single-lane roundabout, when 60 PM peak hour trips are added to the intersection. This intersection is shown as a single-lane roundabout on the Master Street Map, however, this is not enough existing right-of-way to reconstruct the intersection as a single-lane roundabout. Therefore, the applicant should be required to install an interim signal at this intersection prior to ACHD's final approval and signature on the final plat that generates 61 PM peak hour trips, or has 61 single family lots, consistent with the study recommendations, see Finding 2. The intersection is currently improved with a dedicated eastbound right-turn lane, northbound right-turn lane, northbound left-turn lane and an east/west center left-turn lane that extends through the intersection. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of- way abutting the site for the future single-lane roundabout. Site Access The study recommends constructing a dedicated eastbound right-turn lane and dedicated westbound left-turn lane on Amity Road when Amorita Avenue is constructed to intersect Amity Road. The applicant should be required to construct the turn lanes when Amorita Avenue is constructed to intersect Amity Road consistent with the study's recommendation. Shelburne South Subdivision directly north of the site was required to construct a center left turn lane on 5 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Amity Road at Amorita Avenue that tapers to the east. The applicant should coordinate with Shelburne South Subdivision for the construction of the westbound left-turn lane on Amity Road. The study indicates that turn lanes are not warranted on Hillsdale Avenue at Hill Park Street. The applicant has proposed to construct a 38-foot wide curb return type private drive proposed on Hillsdale Avenue 380-feet south of Amity Road. This meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. Traffic Distribution The adjacent neighborhoods to the south of the site have voiced concerns about potential cut- through traffic from this development through their neighborhoods to reach arterial roadways, Amity Road and Cloverdale Road. The study notes that the circulation proposed for the development will provide direct access to Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road for the development. The site traffic is not expected to travel to the south to reach Amity Road or Cloverdale Road since direct access to Amity Road is available through the site via Amorita Avenue and Hillsdale Avenue. It is not practical that the traffic from the site will travel to the south and cut through the adjacent neighborhoods to reach Amity Road and Cloverdale Road since it would require numerous turns and out of direction travel on local neighborhood streets. In addition, the intersection of Amity Road and Cloverdale Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be improved in 2025, which is expected to improve intersection operations and reduce the demand for cut-through routes in the area. Pedestrian Crossing — Hillsdale Avenue The adjacent neighborhoods have also expressed concerns about safe routes to the school and YMCA directly across Hillsdale Avenue to the west of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant consider striping a crosswalk and installing a rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) on Hillsdale Avenue at the intersection with Rockhampton Street or Hill Park Street to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians to the YMCA and school. The applicant will be responsible for the design, hardware, and installation of pedestrian crossing and would be required to enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. See Finding 6. 3. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Functional PM Peak PM Peak Hour Existing Roadway Frontage Classification Hour Level of Service Plus Traffic Count Project Amity Road Better than "E" (between the site 1,300-feet Minor Arterial 615 for 3-lane arterial, „F„ and Eagle Road) "F" for 2-lane arterial Amity Road Better than "E" (from the site to 1,300-feet Minor Arterial 623 for 3-Iane arterial, „F„ Cloverdale Road) "F" for 2-lane arterial * Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is "E" (575 VPH). * Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is "E" (720 VPH). * Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH). 4. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. 6 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • The average daily traffic count for Amity Road from the site to Eagle Road was 7,416 on 08/29/2019. • The average daily traffic count for Amity Road from the site to Cloverdale Road was 6,718 on 08/26/2019. C. Findings for Consideration 1. South Meridian Transportation Plan The South Meridian Transportation Plan (SMTP) is a long range planning tool used to identify future roadway, intersection, and corridor needs in the South Meridian Area, providing a framework for future roadway improvements based on the land use designations. The plan was created in collaboration with the City of Meridian and was adopted by the ACHD Commission in September of 2009. The SMTP shows Amity Road east of Eagle Road as a 3-lane arterial roadway, but recommends preserving right-of-way for a 5-lane arterial roadway for this segment due to the potential for additional traffic demands beyond 2030. The Master Street Map shows 78-feet of right- of-way preservation for a 3-lane arterial roadway for this segment of Amity Road. The Master Street Map is updated every 2 years and was recently updated and adopted by the ACHD Commission in October 2020. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way abutting the site consistent with the Master Street Map since it is the most recently updated guiding document accepted by the ACHD Commission. 2. Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue Intersection — Signal The study recommends signalizing the intersection of Amity Road and Hillsdale Avenue or reconstructing the intersection as a single lane roundabout when 60 PM peak hour trips are added to the intersection, or 60 single family lots are platted. This intersection is shown on the Master Street Map as a single-lane roundabout, however, there is not enough right-of-way to construct a single-lane roundabout with this development. Therefore, the applicant should be required to signalize the intersection as a 3 X 3 interim signal prior to ACHD's final approval and signature on the final plat that contains the 61 It single family lot or the final plat the generates 61 PM peak hour trips. In order to install the interim signal at the Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue intersection, the applicant will need to obtain plan approval and enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. ACHD will provide the signal hardware since ACHD has a signal planned at this intersection. The signal agreement should include requirements that the intersection be designed as a 3 X 3 intersection in its current configuration with the eastbound left turn lane striped out; that the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the design and installation of the interim signal and that interim improvements are not eligible for reimbursement by ACHD. In order to ensure the Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue intersection will be improved when warranted, the following items must be in place prior to plans acceptance of the final plat that contains the 61 It single family lot, or generates 61 PM peak hour trips: • Signal Agreement; • Full design and approved plans for the intersection. 3. Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue — MSM Roundabout a. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, roundabout requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. A new roundabout was identified on the MSM. The new single-lane roundabout is planned at the mid-mile at the Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue intersection. 7 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 b. Staff comments/Recommendation: The Master Street Map shows a single-lane roundabout located at the intersection of Amity Road and Hillsdale Avenue. Additional right-of-way should be dedicated to accommodate the future construction of the single-lane roundabout as shown below; the placement of the roundabout should be shifted to so that the south leg aligns with the Hillsdale Avenue. The template for a single-lane roundabout can be found as Attachment 4. 41-20 i r. -] y. J y Fn. P: T yi09-5 4 df. .^ 4. Adjacent Neighborhood Concerns The adjacent neighborhoods to the south of the site have voiced concerns about potential cut- through traffic from this development through their neighborhoods in order to reach arterial roadways, Amity Road and Cloverdale Road, and are concerned about the gap in sidewalk on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue just north of the school. The traffic impact study notes that the circulation proposed for the development will provide direct routes to Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road for the development. The site traffic is not expected to travel to the south to reach Amity Road or Cloverdale Road since direct access to Amity Road to reach Cloverdale Road is available through the site via Amorita Avenue and Hillsdale Avenue. It is not practical that the site traffic will travel to the south and cut through the adjacent neighborhoods to reach Amity Road and Cloverdale Road since it would require numerous turns and out of direction travel on local neighborhood streets. In addition, the intersection of Amity Road and Cloverdale Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be improved in 2025, which is expected to improve intersection operations and would reduce the demand for cut-through routes in the area. 8 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Sidewalk cannot be constructed with this development to fill the gap in improvements on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue abutting the existing residence shown below at this time due the life estate for that home. The existing residence was originally part of a larger parcel that was recently subdivided for the YMCA and the residence known as Healthy Living Subdivision and was approved by ACHD in 2017. As part of ACHD's action on that development, sidewalk was not required to be constructed abutting the life estate and when the life estate is removed, sidewalk is required to be constructed on Hillsdale Avenue to fill in the gap in improvements. If sidewalk were permitted to be constructed abutting the life estate, it would have been constructed with the development of Healthy Living Subdivision. E Hill I ;� ` . `... 'V 5155 a s v " 17 sea 5n5 - T 112 s6 zssz .-. AfG sox ` _ _ •_. . 532E 0�a 632 5419 53d3 53f13 J � � a Gap in Sidewalk on Hillsdale Avenue The adjacent neighborhoods have also expressed concerns about safe routes to the school and the YMCA directly across the Hillsdale Avenue to the west of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant consider striping a crosswalk and installing a rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) on Hillsdale Avenue at the intersection with Rockhampton Street or Hill Park Street to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians to the YMCA and school, see the figure below. The applicant would be responsible for the design, hardware, and installation of pedestrian crossing and would be required to enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. The applicant has indicated that they are supportive of this recommendation, but do not have a location at this time. See Finding 6. 9 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Al .a s E Hill I1.iik r M� .r 5155 ` 4+ S151MR C' 5171, )nn ..a erg•. '�, ¢' R� • s o as JI� � R aRR � �I ` FR 4 411i1 Ap �� 1 96•i .J.1.)951 r.. _ ._ ., tip. � aL'-•, K � ,. 1/lryi[ 1` Oa f 1, 53idJ 9 .. 5'3z5 5319 53.13 Potential locations for an RRFB pedestrian crossing on Hillsdale Avenue 5. Amity Road — Minor Arterial Road a. Existing Conditions: Amity Road is improved with 2-travel lanes with a center left turn lane at Hillsdale Avenue and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 55 to 62-feet of right-of-way for Amity Road (28-feet from centerline). b. Policy: Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the District before starting any design. Street Section and Right-of Way Width Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 states that the standard 3-lane street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 70 feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Right-of-Way Dedication: District Policy 7205.2 states that The District will provide compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing right-of-way along arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted Capital Improvements Plan using available impact fee revenue in the Impact Fee Service Area. No compensation will be provided for right-of-way on an arterial that is not listed as impact fee eligible in the Capital Improvements Plan. The District may acquire additional right-of-way beyond the site-related needs to preserve a corridor for future capacity improvements, as provided in Section 7300. 10 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Amity Road is designated in the MSM as a Residential Arterial with 3-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 46-foot street section within 78-feet of right-of-way. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to dedicate additional right-of-way for Amity Road abutting the site to total 37-feet from the centerline of the roadway and construct a 10- foot wide concrete multi-use pathway located outside of the right-of-way. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant should be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for Amity Road abutting the site to total 39-feet from the centerline of the roadway consistent with the MSM and widen the pavement to 17-feet from the centerline of the roadway with a 3-foot wide gravel shoulder where deficient abutting the site. The applicant's proposal to construct a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway abutting the site exceeds District Policy, which only requires 5-foot wide detached or 7-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk. However, staff is supportive of the applicant's proposal due to the fact that it is the desire and direction of the ACHD Commission to construct 10-foot wide multi-use pathways on arterial roadways with new development. An interim policy is currently being drafted to implement this requirement with new developments. However, since this is currently not required by District Policy, the applicant should be required at a minimum to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 32-feet from the centerline of the roadway consistent with the current District Policy. For detached sidewalk or multi-use pathways located outside of the right-of-way, the applicant should be required to provide a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the multi-use pathway or sidewalk. The applicant should be required to construct a dedicated eastbound right-turn lane and westbound left-turn lane on Amity Road at Amorita Avenue when it is constructed to intersect Amity Road, consistent with the study recommendations. The applicant should coordinate the construction of the westbound left-turn lane with Shelburne South Subdivision directly north of the site since this subdivision was required by ACHD to construct a center left turn lane on Amity Road at Amorita Road that is proposed to taper to the east. The construction plans for this turn lane have been approved by ACHD. 6. Hillsdale Avenue and Hill Park Street — Collector Roads a. Existing Conditions: Hillsdale Avenue is improved with 2-travel lanes and 3-lanes at Amity Road, vertical curb, gutter and no sidewalk abutting the site. There is 40 to148-feet of right-of- way for Hillsdale Avenue (22 to 65-feet from centerline). b. Policy: 11 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of- curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Residential Collector Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard street section for a collector in a residential area shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider a 33-foot or 29-foot street section with written fire department approval and taking into consideration the needs of the adjacent land use, the projected volumes, the need for bicycle lanes, and on-street parking. Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Hillsdale Avenue is designated in the MSM as a Residential Collector with 2-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 36-foot street section within 50-feet of right-of-way. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7206.5.16 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: 12 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. • The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk with a minimum 8-foot wide planter strip on Hillsdale Avenue abutting the site. The sidewalk is proposed to be located outside of the right-of-way. The applicant has proposed to construct Hill Park Street as a 36-foot wide collector street section with vertical curb, gutter, 8-foot wide planter strips within 47-feet of right-of-way and 5- foot wide detached concrete sidewalks located outside of the right-of-way. The applicant has proposed to construct a 10-foot wide landscaped median at the entrance of Hill Park Street in order to restrict the western most driveways on Hill Park Street to right-in/right- out only. The applicant has proposed to stripe a crosswalk across Hill Park Street on the east side of the western most driveways. j - 21 3.1 ' I i 23 h1 N _.....2 ,n _..,. 2.364 I OAY CARE ge' PLAY PREA i„ :24 3,146 1 24 30 1 t 1 i 20,045 e 0.46 Ac r 1. 25 3.43 $i 2627 -3,12 � r i 9B' mr - � a 29 207� � 2o22 �w DIRECTORY , _E.KILL PARICWSTREET W ' 8 P w_SSC h r A_3 DIRECTORY 1 6,702 w '8_4 2.225 7O4.Ot 102 , 3(W) � t o 3.109 .4(1) 1 18 ' POOL 3,721 u; 0.37 Ac Ca MUF $I a e 3,7 , � s 1 g z 13 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to construct the entry portion of Hill Park Street with a 10-foot wide landscaped median, as proposed, that extends from the entrance of Hill Park Street to 75-feet to the east beyond the edge of the western driveways and 20-foot wide travel lanes on either side of the median with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot wide detached or 7-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk within right-of-way that extends to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. If street trees are desired, an 8-foot wide planter strip is required. For detached sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way, should be required to provide a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. The applicant should be required to move to the crosswalk to the west so that it aligns the with the north/south sidewalk/pathway and extends from the corners of the driveways across Hill Park Street, install pedestrian crossing signs in advance of the crossing and at the crossing, and install street lighting at the crossing. On-street parking will not be allowed on this roadway. The applicant should be required to replace any broken segments of curb and gutter abutting the site on Hillsdale Avenue consistent with the District's Minor Improvements Policy. Hillsdale Avenue Pedestrian Crossing The adjacent neighborhoods have expressed concerns about safe routes to school and the YMCA directly across the street from the site. Staff recommends that the applicant consider striping a crosswalk and installing a rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) on Hillsdale Avenue south of the intersection with Rockhampton Street or Hill Park Street to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians to the school and the YMCA. The applicant has indicated that they are supportive of this recommendation, but has not yet finalized plans for the crossing. The applicant would be responsible for the design, hardware and installation of pedestrian crossing and would enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. If the applicant chooses to install an RRFP on Hillsdale Avenue at Rockhampton Street or Hill Park Street, the applicant will need to obtain plan approval, purchase the signal equipment, and enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. The applicant will need to order and purchase the signal hardware as ACHD does not have these materials available for this project. The signal agreement should include requirements that the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the hardware, design, and installation of the flashing beacon, and that this improvement is not eligible for reimbursement by ACHD. In order to ensure the RRFB with intersection lighting on Hillsdale Avenue is installed, the following items must be in place prior to plans acceptance. • Signal Agreement • Full design and approved plans for the crossing 7. Internal Local Roads a. Existing Conditions: There are no local roadways within the site. There is one local street, Beachfield Avenue, that stubs to the site's south property line and another local street, Macumbo Street, that stubs to the site's east property line. b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. 14 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 47-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). Standard Urban Local Street-33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of- curb)for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within 47-feet of right-of-way. For the City of Kuna and City of Star: Unless otherwise approved by Kuna or Star, the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within 50-feet of right-of-way. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: • Reduces vehicle miles traveled. • Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. • Increases access for emergency services. • Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system. • Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. • Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. • Promotes orderly development. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: 15 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. • The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to extend 2 local stub streets , Beachfield Avenue and Macumbo Street, into the site. The applicant has proposed to construct the entrance of Amorita Avenue as a 52-foot wide street section with two 21-foot wide travel lanes (measured back-of-curb to back-of-curb), a 9- foot wide landscaped median, vertical curb, gutter, 8-foot wide plater strips and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within 79-feet of right-of-way that extends to 1-foot behind the back of sidewalk. The applicant has proposed to construct all other internal local streets as 33-foot wide local street streets with rolled curb, gutter, with 5-foot wide attached concrete sidewalks within 47- feet of right-of-way or 8-foot wide planter strips and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks located outside of the right-of-way. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should also be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for Amorita Avenue so that it extends to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. For detached sidewalk, the applicant may reduce the right-of-way width to 2-feet behind the back of curb and provide a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. The applicant should be required to plat the landscaped medians as right-of-way owned by ACHD. The applicant or homeowners association should be required to enter into a license agreement with ACHD for the maintenance of the landscaping. 8. Roadway Offsets a. Existing Conditions: There are no roadways within the site. b. Policy: Local Street Intersection Spacing on Minor Arterials: District policy 7205.4.3 states that new local streets should not typically intersect arterials. Local streets should typically intersect collectors. If it is necessary, as determined by ACHD, for a local street to intersect an arterial, the minimum allowable offset shall be 660-feet as measured from all other existing roadways as identified in Table 1 a (7205.4.6). Collector Offset Policy: District policy 7206.4.5, states that the preferred spacing for a new local street intersecting a collector roadway to align or offset a minimum of 330-feet from any other street (measured centerline to centerline). Local Offset Policy: District policy 7207.4.2, requires local roadways to align or provide a minimum offset of 125-feet from any other street (measured centerline to centerline). 16 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a collectorl road, Hill Park Street, to intersect Hillsdale Avenue, a collector road, so that it aligns centerline to centerline with Hill Park Street on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue. The applicant has proposed to construct one local road, Amorita Avenue, to intersect Amity Road, located 970-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue so that it aligns with the Amorita Avenue on the north side of Amity Road that will be construct in the future as part of Shelburne South Subdivision. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. 9. Driveways 9.1 Amity Road a. Existing Conditions: There are 2 existing partially paved driveways from the site onto Amity Road: • A 12-foot wide driveway located 250-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue, and • An 18-foot wide driveway located 353-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue. b. Policy: Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops. Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.6 states that direct access to minor arterials is typically prohibited. If a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken from the street having the lesser functional classification. If it is necessary to take access to the higher classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be based on Table 1 a under District policy 7205.4.6, unless a waiver for the access point has been approved by the District Commission. Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7205.4.5 requires driveways located on minor arterial roadways from a signalized intersection with a single left turn lane shall be located a minimum of 330-feet from the nearest intersection for a right-in/right-out only driveway and a minimum of 660-feet from the intersection for a full-movement driveway. District policy 7205.4.5 requires driveways located on minor arterial roadways from a signalized intersection with a dual left turn lane shall be located a minimum of 330-feet from the nearest intersection for a right-in/right-out only driveway and a minimum of 710-feet from the intersection for a full-movement driveway. Successive Driveways: District policy 7205.4.6 Table 1 a, requires driveways located on minor arterial roadways with a speed limit of 50 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 425-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high- volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- 17 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8. Cross Access Easements/Shared Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.1 states that cross access utilizes a single vehicular connection that serves two or more adjoining lots or parcels so that the driver does not need to re-enter the public street system. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to close the 2 existing driveways from the site onto Amity Road with the sidewalk or a multi-use pathway. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. 9.2 Hillsdale Avenue a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways from the site onto Hillsdale Avenue. b. Policy: Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops. District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at bicycle and bus routes. Driveway Location Policy (Signalized Intersection): District policy 7206.4.3 requires driveways located on collector roadways near a signalized intersection to be located outside the area of influence; OR a minimum of 440-feet from the signalized intersection for a full-access driveway and a minimum of 220-feet from the signalized intersection for a right-in/right-out only driveway. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline of the driveway Driveway Location Policy (Stop Controlled Intersection): District policy 7206.4.4 requires driveways located on collector roadways near a STOP controlled intersection to be located outside of the area of influence; OR a minimum of 150-feet from the intersection, whichever is greater. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline of the driveway. Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD to align or offset a minimum of 245-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high- volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6. 18 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a 38-foot wide curb return type driveway from the site onto Hillsdale Avenue to align with the existing commercial driveway on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue located approximately 400-feet south of Amity Road. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. 9.3 Hill Park Street a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing collector roads within the site. b. Policy: Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops. District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at bicycle and bus routes. Driveway Location Policy (Stop Controlled Intersection): District policy 7206.4.4 requires driveways located on collector roadways near a STOP controlled intersection to be located outside of the area of influence; OR a minimum of 150-feet from the intersection, whichever is greater. Dimensions shall be measured from the centerline of the intersection to the centerline of the driveway. Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD to align or offset a minimum of 245-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high- volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct four driveways onto Hill Park Street to access the commercial and multi-family: • Two 25-foot wide curb return type driveways on the north and south side of Hill Park Street, located 188-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue and restrict both driveways to right-in/right-out only with a raised median, and • Twe One 25-foot wide curb return type driveways on the north and south side of Hill Park Street located 176-feet east of the western driveways and 138-feet west of Odell Way. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal for the width of the driveways and curb return type driveways meets District Policy. The applicant's proposal for the driveway locations do not meet District Policy which requires driveways with more than 100 VTD on collector roads with a 25 MPH speed limit to be offset a minimum of 245-feet from any other 19 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 driveway or that driveways be offset a minimum of 150-feet from a public road intersection. However, staff recommends a modification of Policy due to the fact that the Meridian Fire Department has concerns about the drive aisle length without the additional access points for the east and west drive aisles on Hill Park Street, it is necessary for the site circulation to help separate the day care drop-off and pick-up traffic from the multi family townhomes uses and the applicant has restricted the western driveways to right-in/right-out only to eliminate conflicting left-turn movements between driveways. This is a 28% modification of Policy for driveway spacing on collector roads and 8% modification of Policy for driveway spacing from a public intersection on collector roads, respectively, and can be approved at the Development Services Manager level. 10. Private Drive on Stockport Way a. Existing Conditions: There are no roadways within the site. b. Policy: Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7207.4.1 requires driveways near intersections to be located a minimum of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centerline) from the nearest local street intersection, and 150-feet from the nearest collector or arterial street intersection. Successive Driveways: District Policy 7207.4.1 states that successive driveways away from an intersection shall have no minimum spacing requirements for access points along a local street, but the District does encourage shared access points where appropriate. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7207.4.3 states that where vertical curbs are required, residential driveways shall be restricted to a maximum width of 20-feet and may be constructed as curb-cut type driveways. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. Private Road Policy: District policy 7212.1 states that the lead land use agencies in Ada County establish the requirements for private streets. The District retains authority and will review the proposed intersection of a private and public street for compliance with District intersection policies and standards. The private road should have the following requirements: • Designed to discourage through traffic between two public streets, • Graded to drain away from the public street intersection, and • If a private road is gated, the gate or keypad (if applicable) shall be located a minimum of 50-feet from the near edge of the intersection and a turnaround shall be provided. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a 28-foot wide private drive onto Odell Way-Stockport Way that transitions from Rincon Drive to a private drive to access the II multif- 7ppFeVlmot feet erth of Hillsberei gh Street (measured fired neRterl!R townhomes apprv�crmuc�-fcct�vrcrr-vrTmruvv�vugn�crcc�rrTe�var c nenterline\ 20 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 6 38 27 10 21 39 26 0 E.HILLSONG Sr. 40 25 ® 12 <. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11g 41 24 m 1 3,. 1 9 4 23, 18 13 a (R-15) 10 x ZONING LIMITS 43 R 22 14 ZONING LIMITS BL CK S 20. OQ 15 `�21 2 23 24 25 26 451 27 46 3 19 17 48 PRIVATE LANE(W.Rill ON LANE)48 48 _ _ W RINI ON 9 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 BL CK 6 - d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to construct the private drive so that it aligns with Rincon Drive meets District Policy, however, the public road should not transition to a private drive as proposed. The right-of-way should terminate on the west edge of the intersection of Stockport Way and Rincon Drive, shown below. If the City of Meridian approves the private road, the applicant shall be required to pave the private roadway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of all public streets and install pavement tapers with 15-foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge. If private roads are not approved by the City of Meridian, the applicant will be required to revise and resubmit the preliminary plat to provide public standard local streets in these locations. Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. The signs may be ordered through the District. Verification of the correct, approved name of the road is required. ACHD does not make any assurances that the private road, which is a part of this application, will be accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs may be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. The following requirements must be met if the applicant wishes to dedicate the roadway to ACHD: • Dedicate a minimum of 50-feet of right-of-way for the road. • Construct the roadway to the minimum ACHD requirements. The appliGant's proposal to offset multi family driveway on Odell Way 35 f8et Rerth Of Hillsbereluo driveways near IeGal read iRterseGtiORS te aligR er effset a MiRiMUM of 75 feet frem a Staff has GenGerns about the left turn movements out of this driveway and with or offset the driveway a miRim,im of 75 feet from Hillsbero, gh Stroot 21 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 I s 38 27 10 21 39 26 E,HI NO 3 O o 1140 '� _ .✓' a 41 25 ® 12 < 1 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11a 9 s i 3 4 23 13 a� 10 x ZONINGING LIMITS 43 R 22 14 ZONING LIMITS 21 (R_8) BL CK S 45 20 Right-of- 5 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 N 46 3 Way 19 48 PRIVATE LINE(W.Rill ON LANE)48 48 9 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 =_ �2 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 BL CK6 — BLOCK 6 11. Traffic Calming a. Speed Control and Traffic Calming Policy: District policy 7207.3.7 states that the design of local street systems should discourage excessive speeds by using passive design elements. If the design or layout of a development is anticipated to necessitate future traffic calming implementation by the District, or the streets extend greater than 750-feet in length, then the District will require changes to the layout and/or the addition of passive design elements such as horizontal curves, bulb-outs, chokers, etc. The District will also consider texture changes to the roadway surface(i.e. stamped concrete)as a passive design element. These alternative methods may require maintenance and/or license agreement. b. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Beachfield Avenue and Odell Way are local roads that are proposed to have straight segments longer than 750-feet within the development. The applicant should be required to redesign the roadways or provide passive traffic calming measures consistent with District Policy. Stop signs, speed humps and valley gutters will not be accepted as traffic calming. 12. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 13. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 14. Other Access Amity Road is classified as minor arterial roadway, and Hillsdale Avenue and Hill Park Street are classified as collector roadways. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to these roadways and should be noted on the final plat. D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to ACHD's signature on the first final plat, submit a revised preliminary plat showing that Beachfield Avenue and Odell Way are redesigned to reduce the length of the roadway or include 22 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 the use of passive design elements for traffic calming. Stop signs, speed humps/bumps and valley gutter will not be accepted as traffic calming. 2. Signalize the intersection of Amity Road and Hillsdale Avenue as a 3 X 3 interim signal prior to ACHD's final approval and signature on the final plat that contains the 61st single family lot or the final plat the generates 61 PM peak hour trips. ACHD will provide the signal hardware as a signal has been planned for this intersection. Obtain plan approval and enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. The signal agreement should include requirements that the intersection be designed as a 3 X 3 intersection in its current configuration; that the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the design and installation of the interim signal and that interim improvements are not eligible for reimbursement by ACHD. In order to ensure the Amity Road/Hillsdale Avenue intersection will be improved when warranted, the following items must be in place prior to plans acceptance of the final plat that contains the 61 It single family lot, or generates 61 PM peak hour trips: • Signal Agreement; • Full design and approved plans for the intersection. 3. If the applicant chooses to install an RRFB crossings on Hillsdale Avenue at Rockhampton Street or Hill Park Street, the applicant will need to obtain plan approval, purchase the signal equipment, and enter into a signal agreement with ACHD. The applicant will need to order and purchase the signal hardware as ACHD does not have these materials available for this project. The applicant is responsible for the design, hardware and installation of pedestrian crossing. The signal agreement should include requirements that the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the hardware, design, and installation of the flashing beacon, and that this improvement is not eligible for reimbursement by ACHD. In order to ensure the RRFB with intersection lighting on Hillsdale Avenue is installed, the following items must be in place prior to plans acceptance. • Signal Agreement • Full design and approved plans for the crossing 4. Dedicate additional right-of-way for the future roundabout at the intersection of Amity Road and Hillsdale Avenue abutting the site consistent with the attached single-lane roundabout template and Finding 3. 5. Dedicate additional right-of-way to total 39-feet from the centerline of Amity Road abutting the site. 6. Construct a minimum 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 32-feet from the centerline of Amity Road abutting the site. The applicant may also construct a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway in lieu of a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum 32-feet from the centerline of Amity Road abutting the site. 7. Widen the pavement on Amity Road to 17-feet from centerline of the roadway with a 3-foot gravel shoulder where deficient abutting the site. 8. Construct a dedicated eastbound right-turn lane and a dedicated westbound left-turn lane on Amity Road at Amorita Avenue when it is constructed to intersect Amity Road. The applicant should coordinate with Shelburne South Subdivision directly north of the site for the construction of the westbound left-turn lane on Amity Road. 23 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 9. Construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk with an 8-foot wide planter strip on Hillsdale Avenue abutting the site, as proposed. The sidewalk shall connect to the existing sidewalk at the northeast corner of Rockhampton Street and Hillsdale Avenue. 10. Construct one 38-foot wide curb return type driveway from the site onto Hillsdale Avenue that aligns centerline to centerline with the driveway on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue that is located 400- feet south of Amity Road, as proposed. 11. Replace any broken segments of curb and gutter abutting the site on Hillsdale Avenue consistent with the District's Minor Improvements Policy. 12. Construct a collector road, Hill Park Street, to intersect Hillsdale Avenue so that it aligns centerline to centerline with Hill Park Street on the west side of Hillsdale Avenue, as proposed. 13. Construct the entry portion of Hill Park Street with a 10-foot wide landscaped median that extends from the entrance of Hill Park Street to 75-feet beyond the eastern edge of the western driveways with 20-foot wide travel lanes on either side of the median with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot wide detached or 7-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk within right-of-way that extends to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk. If street trees are desired, an 8-foot wide planter strip is required. 14. Construct the remaining portion of Hill Park Street as a 36-foot wide collector street section with vertical curb, gutter, 8-foot wide planter strips with 47-feet of right-of-way and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk, as proposed. 15. Construct one local road,Amorita Avenue,to intersect Amity Road located 970-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue so that it aligns with the Amorita Avenue on the north side of Amity Road that will be construct in the future, as proposed. 16. Construct the entry portion of Amorita Avenue as a 52-foot wide street section with two 21-foot wide travel lanes (measured back-of-curb to back-of-curb), a 9-foot wide landscaped median, vertical curb, gutter, 8-foot wide plater strips and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within 80-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. The applicant may also reduce the right-of-way width to 2-feet behind the back of curb and provide a right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2- feet behind the back of sidewalk. 17. The applicant shall plat all landscape medians as right-of-way owned by ACHD. The applicant or homeowners association shall enter into a license agreement with ACHD for the maintenance of the landscaped medians. 18. Construct all internal local roads as 33-foot wide local street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk within 47-feet of right-of-way, or an 8-foot wide planter strip and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way, as proposed. 19. Close the 2 existing driveways from the site onto Amity Road located 252-feet and 350-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue with the sidewalk or a multi-use pathway with the improvements to Amity Road, as proposed. GARGtFWGt eRG dFiveway OR Odell Way to aGGeSS the PAulti family that aligRF, with Ar is, Aff-set a minims rn of 75._feet from Hillsbe Fey gh Strout 21. Construct one 28-foot wide private drive onto Stockport Way so that it aligns centerline to centerline with Rincon Drive. Terminate the right-of-way on the west edge of the intersection of Stockport Way and Rincon Drive, as shown in Finding 10. 22. Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. The signs may be ordered through the District. Verification of the correct, approved name of the road is required. 23. Construct two 25-foot wide curb return type driveways on the north and south side of Hill park Street located 188-feet east of Hillsdale Avenue, as proposed. Restrict the driveways to right-in/right-out 24 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 only with a raised median that extends from the entrance of Hill Park Street to 75-feet to the east beyond the eastern edge of the driveways. 24. Construct two one 25-foot wide curb return type driveways on the north side and c^��de of Hill Park Street located 138-feet west of Odell Road, as proposed. 25. Stripe a crosswalk on Hill Park Street mid-block, as proposed. The crosswalk shall align with any north/south pathways that will cross Hill Park Street. Install pedestrian crossing signs in advance of the crossing and at the crossing, and install street lighting at the crossing. 26. For detached sidewalk or multi-use pathways located outside of the right-of-way, provide a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the multi- use pathway or sidewalk. Sidewalks and multi-use pathways must be located entirely within right- of-way or entirely within a permanent right-of-way easement. 27. Direct lot access is prohibited to Amity Road, Hillsdale Avenue, and Hill Park Street and should be noted on the final plat. 28. Submit civil plans to ACHD Development Services for review and approval. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD. 29. Payment of impact fees is due prior to issuance of a building permit. 30. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). 2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non- compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number)for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled)are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards 25 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. TIS Executive Summary 4. Roundabout Template 5. Utility Coordinating Council 6. Development Process Checklist 7. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines OR Appeal Guidelines 26 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 VICINITY MAP i Santo tit(�I ik 1)r]fjr FlowO Etil:r ilr cI; `��:I�I'� f �r•11,; a a + W::Dalryirtple EY 41'le rm _E H.iII;Park-Stsro —— = Billaliong"Ct.. St 4a � GL V.'` _ '. ptan.5t _. _ 1, ` �Ra �� "+1 J_ — � "+Jlli_Y IF FO�Orw -W.LatLlanSt.:..--:-:::.v' 1 — •� y s1 w!fi Illanrl�r,S77 ZF (,ran14 ge=St Gr■ange �; !L1 F/ S� r _ _.�_ �._ I� �� s ,; ._•-,.,rIF� di. .. Isid 1N:7.Yr� 27 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 UPDATED SITE PLAN +--L J� ; L 1-1 -LAWN ��SE�1#'##� 113Q�9'-�4----[AY► ---- � ■■■ei I , ' ,li} , � � } a . S � pbKaftts yyy 4 R�. 4 � —E. l�.lpl.�il "St •n i sF SI 81 7 J 7 d 6 7 7 8 1 # } 9u�1'Y jit !r} M tr Z ME R- 17 v5 i 7 PR EC b t It PO It y H N .L re[AK scdlf J-' _ — i IM5 M owl WM _I 9F :- 1$ � N 3 } ' * # 34 S PROPOSED 7 + Jr a F ZONE R,IS itl f I # ti * Y 14 17 w 1' 11 1} 1$ III �I # ' 4 as 17 � p � ROM D +i a St ¢ a Q # « so 12 - 01 . r~: wtVm �. Ht7'J1iM 1•,o�ac' E I Y9 7� I � -------- cuma4 x 28 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 PREVIOUS SITE PLAN TI ---------- -—---------- 11 19 1 4 T i m 4 1 54 11 IIIIM It 13 UJ M 1I 31 10 2F Ii 14 ---------------- 17-------- ts I. J; 04: T AWL 10 � a l! ca x a 1 13 6--g- 20 tk It 17 11 Ib 1i Is Ip III 21 N -----------4 M 35 m ch Iq ki yll AZ- ----------- ---------- -—------------ 29 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CR EnVnmmg, Inc. leas been retained to prepare a traffic iaqxLct study ('ITS) far the proposed Gmten-Me Subdivision located in the southeast quadrant of the Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road=ersectkm in Meridian, Idaho, as shown in Figure 1.1. The scope of this TIS was deternoined through coordination with the Ada County Highway District (A=) with inputs from the Ce mruaity Planning Association of Soxtbmest Idaho (COMPASS)- The TIS e�,atuates the potential traffic impacts resulting from backpDmmd traffic growth,in processdetirelopments in the study area, and the proposed de,�.elapmmt, and ide rifles impronren3ents to mitigate the impacts if needed, Trafficimpacts were evaluated bawd on the proposed land uses and accesses as shown m the prelimmat�, site plan miler weekday AM and PM peals boors traffic conditions- Table 1 snmmnanzes the impro-�remieuts needed to mitigate the traffic impacts far the following anal)-as years traffic conditions: ■ 2020 Existing traffic ■ 2025 Build-out year backgtzrcund traffic ■ 2025 Build-out year total traffic Table 1—Proposed Improvements Summar}- Intersardon 2025 Build-Out Year or 2020 RoadwaT Seff3ment Esistine Back-ground Iotal Eagle i Dual-lane roundabout and 0right-tarn lane final-lane roundabout with 1 S13 right-tarn lane with SB right-turn lane Amity FLd Hillsdale Ave Interim sign al Interim signal and None or or Amity lad single-lane roundabout single-lane rouudabout Clop-erdale Rd Rmenstra-rt as a multilane roundabout Reeonstruet as a multilane roundabout 3 and None oQ or Amity U add SB and RB night-tarn lanes add SB and W13 right-turn lanes A and posed Ug iaedMte� n Tnsign2bzed intersection sty Rd site acess n-e3secta with turn lanes Widen to 9 lanes Wider to 5 laaea Amity Rd Nme a or FagleRdto�,e site widen N 3laues(GIP)plus setup widen to 31ants(C'IP)plus pug into Priority Corridor Fund Priority Corridor Fund IV'iden to:lanes Widrato 5 lanes Amity Rd Nam ar or SdE b Cloverdale Fd widra to 3 hues(C IN pins widen to 3 Ianes{GIP}pins P"into 11 alternative mftation measares I Moft Corridor Fund 1 Roundabout minimally exceeds ACM tbaesholds;no additional improvementr are recommended January 2021 1 30 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho 1.0 Proposes! Development 1.1 Centerville SubdiTision is a proposed mixed-use de-velopment estunaned to contain 124 single-fain* dwelling units}35 to,.-ivhomes, 168 multif ruily'dwell�units,and a 4,D78-square foot day-care center_The anticipated bwld-cut yew for the proposed de-Mopment is 2D25 but may change depending on the market conditions. 1.2 Based on the procedures oudmed in the Trip Gmemffon Hare ook; 3''& fton and the Trip Gmeradon Mannarl, 1OFh F non, both published by the Institute of Transportation Enginor-s (TTE), the proposed d elcpaent is estimated to generate approximately 2,599 tripe pier weekday with 213 trips during the A peak hour and 266 trips during the PM peak hour_ ■ Based on the proposed land uses,the development is not expected to retrain trips within the site ■ Based on the proposed laud uses,the de-velopment is not expected tea attract pass-by tripe ■ All trips generated by the development were assumedto be made by personal or comaurial�,Thicles 13 The estimated site traffic distribution patterns are: 0 1011e uvith onginsdestinations west of the site 2 10%with onginsdestinations east of the site h 70%u-ith ongin&destinations north of the site 0 HP/6 uwith onginsdestinations south of the site 1.4- Centerville Subdivmiou is proposing one approach on Amity Road; one approach on Hillsdale A-venue, connectivity to Macumbo Street within Rockhampton Subdhision to the east, and oonnecti--ity to BleachfreldAxnmue within Houma Lane Su.bdnisiou to the south for site access: I Proposed approach on Amity Road(Amofta Avenue) • Proposed as a full-movement access located approximately 1,010 feet east of Hillsdale A%9mue and aligns mitt the proposed Shelburne South Subdivision approach to the uor#h • Meets AC'HD access spacing on a minor arterial • Expected to require an eastbound right-turn lane and a westbound left-am lane based our AC'HD turn-lane guidelines v The eastbound ught-am lane is warranted when the de�,elep went generates approximately 250 peak hour trips,which is equivalent to full corLstrAion of the daycare facility,full build of the 168 multifamily dwelling unite and 124 single-family dwelling units v The westbound left-turn lane is „ma ted when the de velopment generates approximately 85 peak hour trips,which is equh-allent to approximately 80 of the 124 single-fnuily dwelling units or full build of the 168 inultifiniily dxelliug units • Northbound mowments are expected to meet ACM nunirniunt operational thresholds with the umn-anted nun hues ■ Proposed approach on Hillsdale A-�x-nue(Hi11 Park Street) • Proposed as a full-ram ement access located appro mmtely 310 feet south of the Hillsdale commercial access and aligns with Hill Park Street to the west • Meets AC'HD access spacing on a 25-mile per hour collector street • Is not expected to require turn lases ito the site based on ACTT ttun-lane guidelines January 2021 31 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 �y Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho .0 2020 Existing Traffic Conditions 2.1 Due to the redw&d.travel demand from the C:D�'ID-19 pandemic at the tune of this TTS,no new traffic counts were collected for this TLS. Old traffic counts collected between 2018 and M 19 for pre-,ious studies in the area were used in this TIS_The 201SQ019 traffic counts were scaled up to 2D20 isbng traffic using the following annual growth rates based am COMPASS model forecasts and coordination with ACHD: ■ Eagle Road north of Amity Road—12.0° ■ Eagle Road south of Amity Road and Amity Road—5.0% ■ Crhmwdale Road—3.0% ■ Hillsdale Avenue—2.0% 2.2 With the estimated 2020 existing traffic,one study area intersection exceeds AGED fvin nwtrn operational thresholds analyzed -with the existing intersection control, signal timing, and lane oonfigumtions. Th e rse intechoi4 operational dues,and it mill„mi mitigation imp'rm-ement are. ■ Eagle lid and Amity Road roundabout + The onrerall intersection and all lane groups are anticgmded to meet minimum operational thresholds with the exception of one lane group: v The soul bound approach is operating at Lenml of Service(LDS)F with a vohune to capacity ratio (vic)of 1.13 during the PM peak hour, which exceeds both ACHD LDS E and.0.85 vfc ratio thresholds + Construcung an additional southbound right-ttuu lane is recommended as an mtff= mitigation improvement v With the additional southbound right-turn lane,the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C oi•better with a xdc ratio of 0.82 cd less for all lane groups during the peal,hours The Eagle Road sad Amity Road iniersection is programmed m the ACHD 2021-2023 hrtegratedFrw- Year Work Plan(En WP)to be widened,-reconstnuted to a diugl-lace roundabout with two entering and exiting lames on all approaches in 202 1. 23 The Htllsdale Air mue and Amity Road intersection meets MLTrCD signal W-arrant 1 .and W-arrant 2 with 2D20 existing traffic_ Howe�,er, the intersection meets ACHD minirmn, operational thresholds as as unsignalized intersection_As a result,no mitigation imtprovements are recommended to mitigate 2020 traffic operations. 2_4- With 2020 existing traffic,all study area rozftmv seZments meet ACHD level ofsen ice planning thresholds mitt the existing lane configuration Besides the intersection imprm-ements, no roadway capacity impr nremenis are recommended to mitigate-21020 existing traffic operations. 10 2025 Build-Out Year Background Traffic Conditions (No Site Traffic) 3.1 2D25 background traffic was estimated by extrapolating the existing txaffic counts with the fo-lkywing annaaal growth rates based on COMPASS model forecasts and coordination with ACHD: ■ Eagle Road north of Amity Road—12.0% ■ Amity Road and Eagle Road south of Amity Road—5.0% ■ C'lmwdale Road—3.()°/,0 ■ Hillsdale Avenue—2.0% January 2021 = 32 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho 3.2 V;#A 2025 background traffic, three shtdy area intersections are anticipated to e)! a ACHD"numat operational thresholds analyzed width the existing mtersect;on control and lane con igarations(no-build)_Tb,- intersections,operational deficiencies,and proposed mitigation u 4nm-ements are: III Eagle Road and Amity Road naundabout The intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS E with the critical northbound lane group operating at LOS F with a vfc ratio of 1_U3 during the AM peak hour,and LOS F .vith the critical southbouud lane group operates at LDS F with a v Jc ratio of 2.26 during the PM peals hour' + The muuiumm m4yov meets rerommeuded to mitigate 2025 background traffic operations are: v Widen and reconstruct to a dik91-lane roundabout as grog mmaed m the IFY44P ,vith two entering and exiting lanes on all approaches plus a sott#hboundright-tam lane ■ The southboimd right-tutu lane is not programmed in the IFYWP but is needed to mitigate 2025 badcgroimd traffic operations to meet AC.'HD minitrnun operational thresholds ■ Without the additional soutWxnmd right-turn lane, the soul bound lane groups are anticipated to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour with vic ratios exceeding 1.00 ■ With the additional suthbound right-turn lane,the intersection operates at LOS C:or better with all lam groups operating at LOS C:or better;vith vic ratios of 0.82 or less during the peak hours The intersection fails under existing traffic conditions; therefore. it will oontinue to fail with additional background traffic growth i Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road intersection(M-o options) • The critical northbound left-tiun lace croup is anticipated to operate at LDS F with a vic ratio of 0.45 during the AM peak hour and at LOS F uith a vic ratio of 0.90 dutniug the PM peak hour, exceeding AC.'HD LDS E threshold + Two mitigation options arereoominended: v Option 1—Install traffic signal with existing lanes ■ As under existing ftaffic conditions, the intersection meets N=CD signal Wafrant 1 and %Varrant 2 tusder 2025 background traffic conditions ■ A traffic signal would be an interim imprmTnierit as the intersection is planned far a single- laue round .bout ■ With a traffic signal and existing lace configuration,the onTerall intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS B or better with an intersection v c:ratio of 0.62 or less doting the peak hones. All lane groups are anticipated to operate at LOS C:or better with We ratios of 0.81 or less dwing the peak hours. v Option 2—Recrmcmrt as a single-lase roundabouA ■ The Hills[entity Farms 6nnelopm eut is planning to reconstruct the Hillsdale Avenne and Amity Road intersection as a single-lane roundabout to mitigate their impacts as conditioned by ACM. ■ With a single-lane roundabout,the intersection is anticipated to operate at LDS B with all lane groups operating at LOS B or better with 1c ratios of 0.72 or less&=g the peak hours The critical northbound left-turn lane group is anticipated to operate at LOS F and triggers mitigation improvements by 2021 with an additional background traffic increase of approximately 60-ducles per hour(vph)dieing the PM peal,ham beyond 2020 existing traffic volumes Traffic cou=s should be recollected in the fixture to verify traffic Brawl andiWcwement needs Jane ary 2021 4- 33 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 a�imrrit Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho 111 Cloverdale Road and.omits Road intersection(2 options) • The intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS E oath an mwall intersectian vdc ratio of 0.91 diuW the peak hours, exceeding ACHD 0.90 threshold. Additionally- two lane gravpa are anticipated to operate at LOS F with a v:c ratio exceeding 1.00: o The westbound throughlright-hum lane group is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a vie ratio of 1.04 during the AM peak hour o The southbotnd thraough/righttturu lane group is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a v/c ratio of 1.08 during the FM peak hour • Two mitigation options are reconunmded: c Option 1 —Reconcmrt as a multilane roundabout — two entering and exiting lanes on the Cl(nTrdale Raad approaches and me shared throughfleft4um lane and one right-turn lane on the Amity Road approaches ■ The intersection is programmed in the IFY%T to be widened-reconstructed m a multilane roundabout with mo entering and exiting lanes on.the Cloverdale Road approaches and one entering and exiting lane on the Audits Road approaches_The additional right-turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches arenot programmed in the IF'lt YP but are needed to mitigate 2025 background traffic operations_ ■ As a multilane roundabout with.the lane configurations as programmed in the IFY XT. the westbound approach is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a vic ratio of 0.92 during the Alai peak hour and the eastbmmd approach is anticpated to operate at LOS E with a v c ratio of 0.94 during the PM peak hour,exceeding ACHD 0.85 threshold ■ With the additional right-turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound .approaches, the injtersemon is anticipated to operate at LOS B with all lane groups anticipated to operate at LOS D or better ivAL-,,`c ratios of 0.76 or less during the peak hours • Option 2—Constructright-tumlanesonthesouxhbouud and westbound approaches with the existrng Signal o With the additional right-turn lanes,the o�Trall intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS D with a v/c ratio less than 0.90 during the peak hours.All lane groups are anticipated to operate at LOS E or better with v/c ratios of 0.96 or less during the peak hours • The intersection is anticipated to exceed fl,+ninium operational thresholds and triggers mitigafiam improvements by 2024 with an additional background traffic increase of approximately 300 vph during the PM peakhour beyond2020 existing traffic volumes v Traffic cou=should be recollected in the faturetn-Lnmjy tra�ffic gromh and imprm-ementneeds 33 With 2025 background traffic,both study area roadu-ay segments on Amity Road between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road are anticipated to exceed AC=level of senace planning thresholds with the existing lane config mhm during the peak hours_The steady area roadway segments,capacity deficiencies,and proposed mitigation improvements are: r :kmih-Road segment between Eagle Road and Hillsdale Avenue(two options) • The anticipated peak hour directional volume on this roadway segment is 770 vph m the AM peak hour and 821 ,,ph in the Phi peak hour,exceeding ACM 720 vph threshold • Option 1—Widen to fire lanes o Based oa the proj ected vchmes,this Amity Road segment needs five lanes to meet ACHD LOS plan threshold January 2021 5 34 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho • Option 2—Widen to three lanes as programmed m ACHD OlP plus Setup a Priority Cctridor Fund o This Amity Road segment is constrained to a numimurn of three lanes: ■ According to ACHD Master Street Map (MS 4 Amity Road is identified for three lanes ROW presen-arum bets een Eagle Road and Ckn-erdale Road ■ According to ACHD 2020 CEP, Amity Road is prograrnined to be widened to duee lanes between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road between 2036 and 2040 • This Amity Road segment is anticipated to continue to emceed ACED LDS p171� threshold dining the PM shoulder hour as a three-lane minor arterial. Therefore,ACHD should investigate into dc-velcp M a Priority Corridor Fund for future imprrnements between Amity Road and Hillsdale AiT nue. + This Amity Road segment is anticipated to exceed ACHD LOS planning threshold by 2024 with an additional background traffic increase of approximately 105 -,ph in the peak direction during the PM peak hoer beyond 2020 existing traffic volumes v Traffic ommts should be recollected in the fixture to verify traffic pm-th and impro%,nnmt needs ■ Amih-Road segment between Hillsdale Avenue and Cloverdale Road(two options) • The anticipated peak hour directional-volume on this roadway segment is 784-vph m the AM peal- hair and 817 Kph in the Phi peak hour,emeedmg ACM 720 vph threshold Option 1—Widen to fire lanes o Based on the projected vohmes,this Amity Road segment needs five lanes to meet ACHD LOS planning threshold_ • option 2—Widen to three lanes as programmed in ACHD CIP plus alternative mitigatianmeas mes v This Amity Road segment is constramed to a maxiawm of three lanes: ■ According to ACID MSK Amity Road is identified:far three lames ROW preservation between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road ■ According to ACHD 2020 CIP, Amity Road is programmed to be widened to three lanes between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road between 2036 and 2040 • This Amity Road segment is anticipated to meet ACED LOS plaunmg threshold during the shoulder hours as a three-lane minor arterial_ As a result, ACHD should consider the follouring mitigation alternatives: o M imuDa sight distance obstructions at drkeuways and intersections along thisroadscay segment o Install 34nch retroreflech%T tapeJsheeting on the signal backplates at the C10-.,erdale Road and Amity;Road intersection to impro,,e signal head�,,Edmlidty,which could potentially reduce the crash frequency and-cr severity(C11 Clearinghouse ID: 1410) o Construct missing sidewallm o Construct bicycle facilities o Provide mid-block crossing om Amity Road ■ Pedestrian crossing treatment should be conducted This Amity Road segment is anticipated to exceed ACHD LOS planning threshold by 2024 with an additional background traffic imrrease of approximately 97 vph m the peak direction during the PM peal-hour beyond 2020 existing traffic vnbvnes v Traffic counts should be recollected m the fixture to-%T nfy traffic growth and imprm-emient needs January 2021 6 35 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 CR E`.iOV "Va LW Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho 4.0 2025 Build-Out Year Total Traffic ondldons-(Background Plus Site Traffic) 4.1 With 2025 total traffic, three study area intersections are anticipated to e!�cceed a;++;TT,um operational thresholds analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations_ The intersections, operational defiaencies,and proposed mitigation imprm-ements are: 11 Eagle Rand and sty Road intersection + The intersection is anticipated to operate at LDS F during the peak hours. Additionally, the westbound and northbound approaches are anticipated tea operate at LOS F with vdc ratios exceeding 1.00 during the AM peak peak hour_The eastbound and southb aund approaches are anticipated to operate at LOS F withvic ratios exceeding 1.00 during the PM peal:hour • As with 2025 background traffic conditions,the rec.r,r„tS,m ationmitigation improwmients are: o Widen and reconstruct to a dual-lane roundabout as progranmed. in the IFY-WP with two entering and exiting lanes on all approaches plus a soirthhound right-turn lane o With these waprm,ements, the intersection is anticipated to meet minirlmm operational thresholds except for the sorthbound through lane group operating with a v/c ratio of0.88 during the Phi peak hour,uhich slightly exceeds ACHD 0_85 threshold ■ No additional iniprmemeats are proposed to reduce the cri cal.lane group v?c below 0.85 S- AC=HD may pexn it thbe ammmxn v c ratio to be greater than 0_85 on a case-by-case basis to avoid mwbuilding Y Adding additional turn lanes is not expected to reduce the southboimd through lane gfmT We ratio to below 0.85 + The intersection fails under existing traffic conditions without additional site tr,,fic ■ Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Road intersection(two op dons) + The critical northbound left-=u lane group is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a v.c ratio weeding 1.00 during the peak hours,exceeding tmn9amim operational thresholds • As with 2025 background traffic conditions,two mitigation options are recommended: o Option 1—Install traffic signal with existing lanes ■ As with existing and 2025 background traffic conditions,the intersection meets MUTED signal Wan-ant 1 and Tarrant 2 under 2025 total traffic conditions ■ A traffic signal would be an interim impronTmeat as the initersectim is planned for a single- lane roundabout ■ With a traffic signal and existing lane configutatitm,the<nerall intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS B la ith a v/c ratio of 0.73 or less during the peak hours_All lane groups are anticipated to operate at LOS C:or better with v�c ratios of 0.81 or less during the peak hours Option 2—Reconstruct as a single-lane roundabout ■ The Hills Century Farms development is planning to reconstruct the Hillsdale Avenue and Amity Rand intersection as a single-lane roundabout to mitigate their impacts as conditioned by AC:HD_ ■ With a single-lane roundabout,the inbusecti€n is anticipated to operate at LOS E or biter with all law groups opEating at LDS C:or better with;./c ratios of 0.83 cr less dloring the pear hours January 2021 36 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 'a?im ► G Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho + The critical northbound left-hum lane group~is anficipated.to operate at LOS F and trigger mitigation insprovements by 2021 with an additional traffic increase of approximately 60 Kph during the PM peal;hoar beyond 2020 existing traffic volumes o Traffic counts should be recollected in the frphue to 69E i background traffic grouch, site de,6mlapment,and improvement needs Cloverdale Road and.Amity Road intersection • The overall udusection is anticipated to open ate at LOS E with a vie ratio of 0.94 or greater during the peak hours,exceeding ACID 0.90 threshold. Additionally,two lane groups are anticipated to operate at LOS F with v/c ratios exceeding 1.00: D The westbound througWright-hum lane group is anticipated to operate at LDS F with a vie ratio of 1.08 during the AM peak hour o The southbound thmughFfightttiuu lane group is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a vie ratio of 1.14 during the FM peak hour + As with 2025 background traffic conditions,two mitigation opliom are rero:mmiended= o Option 1 —Reconstruct as a multilane roundabout —two entering and exiting lanes on the Cloxwdale Road approaches and one shared throughuleft-turn lane and one nghf-ftwn lane on the Amity Road approaches ■ The intersection is programmed in the IFI'%T to be widened-reconstmcted as a multilane roundabout v6ithtwo entering and exiting lanes on the Chnwdale Road approaches and one entering and exiting lane on the Amity Road approaches_The additional right-turn lames on the eastbound and westbound approaches are not programmed in the IF%'IP but are needed to mitigate 2025 background traffic operations_ ■ As a multilane roundabout with the lane configurations as programmed in the U YVR, the 1wesdxmnd approach is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a We ratio of 0.97 during the AM peak hour, and the eastbound approach is anticipated to operate at LOS F with a v c ratio of 1.01 during the PM peak hour,exceeding ACHD 0.85 threshold ■ With the additional right-turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches, the intersection is anticipated to operate a LOS C:with all lane groups operating at LOS D or better with vic ratios of 0.82 or less dosing the peak hours • Option 2—C.'onstructright-turn lanes on the southbouud and westbound approaches with the existing signal o With the adddonal right-turn lanes,the rnTrall intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS D with a ylc ratio less than 0.90 during the peak hours_All lane groups are anticipated to Operate at LOS E or better with i�c ratios of 0.98 or less during the peak hours + The intersection is anticipated to exceed tnimmuum operational thresholds and trigger mitigation improvements by 2023 with an additional traffic increase of approximately 290 vph during the PM peak hour beyond 2020 existing traffic vohunes Traffic counts should be recollected in the future to verify background traffic growth, site de--mkpreat,and improvemn needs 4.2 The estimated site tfaffrc as a percentage of the 2025 total traffic at the study area intersections are: il Eagle Road and Amity Road intersection—AM peak=5.DI/e,Phi peak=4.5% ■ Hillsdale Avemie and Ammty Road intersection—AM Peale=8.9%.Phi peak= 10.2% ■ C'lm-erdale Road and Amity Road intersection—AM Peak=3.%.PM peak=4.3% ■ Amorita A�-enue and Amity Road intersection—AM Peak—6.5%,PM peak=7.9% January 2021 S 37 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Ildaho 4.3 With 2025 total traffic, both study area roadway segments on Amity RDad between Eagle Road and ClovTrdale Road are antlticipatedta continue to exceed ACID kn el of semce planning thresholds with the existing lane configuration during the peal:hours. The study area roadway segmems,capacity deficiencies, and proposed mitigation improvements are= i Amur Road segment between Eagle Road and MRsdale Avenue(two options) • The anticipated peak hoar diri?cuonal volume on this roadway segment is 854 Kph in the AM peak hour and 911 Kph in the FM peak hour,exceeding ACHD 720 xphthreshold • Option 1—Widen to five lanes o Based on the pMected.votumes,this AntiityRoad segnieui needs five In to meetACHDLOS planning threshold • Option 2—Widen to three lanes as programmed in ACED GIP plus pay into the Priority Co!mdor Fund This Amity Road segue is constrained to a maximum of three laties= ■ According to ACHD Master Street Map{A Iv1 Amity Road is id m ified for three laces presmmtioa between Eagle Road and C:lo-tiTfdale Road ■ According to ACHD 2020 CIP, Amity Road is programmed to be need to three lanes between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road between 2036 and 2040 o This Amity Road segment is anbc4xded to oontil a to exceed ACED LDS planning threshold during the PM shculderhotx as a three-lane minor arterial.Therefore.ACED should=,estigate into de,relopiug a Priority Corridor Fund for fifixe imprm-ements on Amity R-aad The developer may request to enter into a Development Agreement and pay into the Pnonty CWndor Fund an aimcnmt to be deumnmed by ACHD to offset the dz%,elopment impacts. • This Aniihy Road segment is ancipated to exceed ACM LOS planning threshold by 2023 with an additional traffic increase of approximately 105 Kph during the PM peak hour Traffic counts should be recollected in the hime to resift' background traffic groin site de--Tlopnient,and imprmemient needs Amity Road segment between Hillsdale A%-enue and Cloverdale Road(taro options) • The anticipated peak hour directional volume on this roadway stet is 811 vph in the AM peal- hour and 876 Kph in the PM peak hour,exceeding ACHD 720-kph threshold • Option 1—Widen to fih,-e lanes Based on the projected volumes,this Amity Road segment need_five In to meetACHD LOS planning threshold • Option 2—Widen to three lanes as programmed in ACHD C W plus pay=the Pnonty Corridor Fund This Amity Road segue is constrained to a maximum ofthree lanes: ■ According to ACHD MSM,Amity Road is identified far three lanes preservation between Eagle Road and Cknerdale Road ■ According to ACHD 2020 CIP, Amity Road is programmed to be widened to three lanes between Eagle RDad and Cloverdale Road between 2036 and 2040 This Amity Road segment is anticipated to continue to exceed ACHD LOS planning threshold during the PM shoulder hour as a three-Ltne mines arterial.Therefore,ACHD should investigate into de-L elopmg a Priority Condor Fund for $ihxe imprmwelments on Anuh Road The develcpeT ntay request to eater into a De-,�-elopmcnt Aunt and pay into the Priority Corridor Fund an amount to be deumn ned by ACED to offset the de-�elopment impacts. January 2021 9 38 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Traffic Impact Study Centerville Subdivision-Meridian,Idaho This Amity Road segmenct is anticipated to exoeed ACM LCkS planning threshold by 2023 with as additional=ffic uu rease ofapproadmately 97 vph during the FM peak hm Traffic oaunts should be recollected m the future to %may background traffic growth, site deg e�t,and impro emeut needs 4.4 The estimated site traffic as a percentage-of the 2025 totat traffic on the study area road xuy segtneuts are: i Amity Road between File Road and the site—A peak=9.8%,P peal.=9.9% i Amity Road between the site and Ckw rdale Road—AM Feat€=6.Wo,PM peak—6.7°o 39 Centerville Subdivision MPP20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Single-Lane Roundabout Template I; I WEST --= --- �{ fj. P'K'q w F PC`35•FROM EN CL 'CC-5730'FROM EW CL —297.13•FROM XS CL —6676•FRCM 4S CL RL,O2.34.6868' N�c—ez.so'FA6.Ew 4tl I` —G 1.49 FAA.XS R-2625P, II L-95.51' PT-17bQV FROM EW CL —35.W FROM NS CL ` ON' 1 0 ' I I 40 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5)working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to:50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for e-mail notification information. 41 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ❑Send a"No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Items to be completed by Applicant: ❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD,then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services(ACHD)for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to,driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request"form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ❑Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application"to ACHD Construction—Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ❑ Sediment&Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion &Sediment Control Narrative&Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. ❑ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ❑ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con. 42 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary and Clerk of the District, which must be filed within ten (10)working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 43 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 11:00 a.m. 2 days prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 44 Centerville Subdivision M P P20-0018/ H-2021-0046