HomeMy WebLinkAboutChampion Park Sub MI
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LA WAND
DECISION & ORDER
RECEIVEJJ
FEB - 9 2006
, nV '" ~=
CtCmdi ã~'-f .~
I liJ.\HO r:
~~.... /1
'>(~/ >'>- ~)
= "J>L~~ sy.-~ 'fH1
In the Matter of Re-zoning 1.89 acres from R-8 to C-G (General Retail and Service
Commercial)(0.94 acres) and C-N (Neighborhood Business)(0.95 acres) AND Preliminary
Plat approval request for 48 single-family residential building lots (24 attached and 24
detached), 2 commercial lots and 4 common lots on 11. 44 acres AND Conditional Use
Permit approval to modify CUP-02-049 by removing the proposed mini-storage use and
replacing that with attached and detached single-family dwellings AND Miscellaneous
request to modify the recorded Development Agreement for Champion Park Subdivision
(F.K.A. - Parkstone Subdivision), by Hillview Development Corporation.
Case No(s).: RZ-05-021, PP-05-061, MCU-05-004, and MI-05-015
For the City Council Hearing Date of: February 14, 2006
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 14, 2006
incorporated by reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 14, 2006
incorporated by reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of
February 14,2006 incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of February 14,2006 incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code
codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of
Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-OS-O21 / PP-OS-O61 / MCU-OS-OOS / MI-OS-O1S - PAGE I of 5
3. The conditions shal1 be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code §
11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received ITom the govel11mental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected
party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, and the
Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February
14, 2006 incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and
the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced by having submitted the Preliminary Plat
dated September 29,2005 is hereby conditionally approved;
2. The applicant's Site Plan as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan dated January
4, 2006 is hereby conditionally approved; and,
3. The following modifications to site specific conditions were made at the City Council
hearing:
a. None.
4. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff
Report for the hearing date of February 14, 2006 incorporated by reference.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits (as applicable)
1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration
Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a
maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City.
During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the
conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-O5-021 / PP-O5-06I / MCU-O5-005 / MI-05-015 - PAGE 2 of 5
and acquire building permits and COlmnence construction of pennanent footings or
structures on or in the ground. For conditions use pennits that also require platting, the
final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with
multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the
event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple
phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year
ITom the original date of approval. If the successive phases are not submitted within the
one (1) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and
void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the tennination of the
period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the
time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional
time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the
Commission may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may
require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code
Title 11.
2.
Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final
plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to record a final plat
within two (2) years ofthe approval ofthe preliminary plat or one (1) year of the
combined preliminary and final plat or short plat. In the event that the development of
the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,
and confonns substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if
submitted within successive intervals of eighteen (18) months, may be considered for
final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval. Upon written request
and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with ll-6B-
7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to record the final plat not to
exceed eighteen (18) months. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as
determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the
Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and
final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code
Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time
extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again.
Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
E.
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat
or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis.
Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than
twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request
for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for
Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NOeS). RZ-O5-021 / PP-O5-061 / MCU-O5-005 / MI-O5-015 ~ PAGE 3 of5
the conditional use pennit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
F.
Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 14,2006
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-O5-021 /PP-O5-061 /MCU-O5-005/MI-O5-015 -PAGE40fS
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
,2006.
day of
COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED
TIE BREAKER
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
VOTED
DATED:
MOTION:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
MA YOR TAMMY de WEERD
ATTEST:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK
Copy served upon:
Applicant
Planning Department
Public Works Department
City Attorney
By:
City Clerk's Office
Dated:
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). RZ-O5-021 / PP-O5-061 / MCU-O5-005 / MI-O5-0I5 - PAGE 5 of5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNrNG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Hearing Date: 2/14/2006
Mayor and City Council
C. Caleb Hood, Current Planning Manager
Meridian Planning Department
208~884-5533
/
c:M;;ìdl~ \
I ILJ.\I-IO ~
"-? I
~;I\¡- .....l
,.,.~ '}' Y""~~"-)
, .. '.-.'i\.!'.~_-,_.~~ ':1;1
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Champion Park Addition Subdivision
RZ-05-021
Rezone of 1.89 acres from R-8 to C-G (General Retail and Service
Commercial)(0.94 acres) and C-N (Neighborhood Business)(0.95 acres).
PP-05-061
Preliminary Plat approval of 48 single-family residential building lots (24
attached and 24 detached), 2 commercial lots and 4 common lots on 11.44
acres.
MCU-05-004
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval to modify CUP-02-049 by removing
the proposed mini-storage use and replacing that with attached and detached
sing1e~family dwellings.
MI~05-015
Miscellaneous request to modify the recorded Development Agreement for
Champion Park Subdivision (F.K.A. - Parkstone Subdivision.)
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant, Hillview Development Corporation, has applied for Re.zoning of 1.89 acres from
R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) to C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial) for 0.94
acres and C-N (Neighborhood Business) for 0.95 acres; Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use
Permit approval of 48 single. family building lots, 2 commercial building lots, and 4 common lots
on 11.44 acres; and a Miscellaneous request to modify the existing development agreement for
this property. The site is located on the north side of Us tick Road, approximately 1,300 feet west
of Eagle Road. This site is cUITentIy vacant. The site has not been previously final platted, but
was a part of the original Champion Park (a.k.a - Parkstone) Subdivision. The subject property
is within the Urban Service Planning Area and within the current city limits.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard the item on January 5, 2006. At the public
hearing they moved to recommend approval.
a. Summary of Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Becky McKay (applicant's representative)
ii. In opposition: Tom Davis
iii. Commenting: Jonathan See1e
iv. Staff presenting application: C. Caleb Hood
v. Other staff commenting on application: Ted Baird
b. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Land use buffer widths.
ii. Requiring CUP's for uses on the 2 proposed commercially zoned lots.
c. Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation:
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-05-0I5
PAGE I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAff REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
1. Remove the 4th bullet on Pae:e 9 of the Staff Report which required only one of
the two proposed commercial zones to obtain CUP approval in the future. The
Commission voted to require both commercial lots to obtain CUP approval. as
cuITently required bv the existin!! DA.
11. At the January 5th. Commission hearin!!. the applicant volunteered to construct a
6-foot tall vinvl fence a10n!! the east property line. The applicant also a!!reed to
include a clause within the future purchase a!!reements with the propertv owners
of the lots within Champion Park Addition. makin!! potential buyers aware of the
commercial zoning and future uses to the east. The fencine: provision has been
added to the Conditions of Approval (Condition 1.1.4) in Exhibit B. Staff
supports the applicant's proposal to make future lot owners aware of the
CentrePointe commercial development to the east. but staff has not included a
requirement for the applicant to include a disclosure statement in the future
purchase and sale agreements. A condition of this nature would be impossible for
staff to track and enforce.
d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None.
The subject applications (RZ, PP, MCU, and MI) were submitted to the Planning
Department for concurrent review. Generally, the Planning & Zoning Commission is the
final decision making body on a Conditional Use Permit. However, because the City
Council is the final decision making body on the Rezone, Miscellaneous and Preliminary
Plat applications, all of the subject applications are being combined into one staff report.
Below, staff has provided a detailed analysis and recommended conditions of approval for the
requested applications. The Plannin!! & Zonin!! Commission is recommending approval of the
proposed Champion Park Addition Subdivision ŒZ-05-021. PP-05-061. MCU-05-004 and MI-
05~015) with the conditions listed in Exhibit B of the Staff Report.
3, PROPOSED MOTION (to be considered after the public hearing)
Approve
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers RZ-
05-021, PP-05-061, MCU-05-004 and MI-05-015, as presented in staff report for the hearing date
of February 14, 2006 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Deny
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers
RZ-05-021, PP-05-061, MCU-05-004 and MI-05-015, as presented in the staff report for the
hearing date of February 14, 2006 for the following reasons: (You should state specific
reasons for denial of the annexation and you must state specific reason(s) for the denial
of the plat.)
Continue
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File
Numbers RZ~05-021, PP-05-061, MCU-05-004 and MI-05-015, to the hearing date of (insert
continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific
reason(s) for continuance.)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
North side of Us tick Road, approximately 1,300 feet west of
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-06I1MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-015
PAGE 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
Eagle Road, at the northeast comer of Us tick Road and Leslie
Way /4N1E32
b. Owner:
Hillview Development Corporation
150 E. Aikens Street, Ste. A
Eagle, ill 83616
c. Applicant:
Hillview Development Corporation
150 E. Aikens Street, Ste. A
Eagle, ill 83616
d. Representative:
e. Present Zoning:
Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP
R-8
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential
g. Description of Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a 54-lot
development that includes 48 single-family buildable lots, 2 commercial lots and 4 common
lots on property that was originally approved by the City for mini-storage units and
commercial businesses The applicant is proposing to modify the original approvals and
overall site plan by changing this phase of the development from commercial mini-storage to
primarily residential. The applicant is proposing an even mix of single-family attached and
detached lots in this amended phase of the development. All of the proposed residential lots
confonn to the dimensional standards ofthe R-8 zone. The average lot size in the proposed
development is 6,887 square feet. The gross density of Champion Park Addition is 4.77
dwelling units per acre. Less than 2% of the area being developed in this phase is being set
aside for open space. However, 11 % of the total Champion Park development is being set
aside for open space.
1. Date of preliminary plat (attached as Exhibit A): 9/29/05 (Revised 10-20-05)
2. Date of landscape plan (attached as Exhibit A): 11/10/05
h. Applicant's Statement/Justification: The proposed Champion Park Addition is currently zoned
R~8 and was approved as a planned development that included attached and detached single-
family housing, four office lots, two commercial lots, and one mini-storage lot. The portion of
the project fonnerly proposed as a mini-storage lot is now being proposed as Champion Park
Addition, with 24 single-family detached lots and 24 single-family attached lots. We are
concurrently submitting a request for preliminary plat, rezone of the two commercia110ts to C-
G and C-N as requested by staff, and a modification ofthe development agreement and
conditional use pennit. No variances are being requested for this project. Rezone to C-N is
requested for a 0.95 acre lot and rezone to C-G is being requested for a 0.94 acre lot, as
requested and approved in the original development agreement for the overall project. The
remaining 7.57 acres will remain zoned R-8 and be platted as a residential development. As
the property to the east is designated Mixed Use-Regional, no buffer is proposed adjacent to
the commercial lots. We ask that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Orders for
the previous approval be amended as necessary to reflect the above changes (please see
Applicant's Submittal Letter.)
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-061 /MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-015
PAGE 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will in fact constitute an annexation as detennined by City Ordinance.
By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 5, a public hearing is
required before the City Council on this matter.
b. The subject application will in fact constitute a preliminary plat as determined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 6, a public
hearing is required before the City Council on this matter.
c. The subject application will in fact constitute a conditional use pennit as detennined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5, a public
hearing is required before the City Council on this matter.
d. Miscellaneous applications are not currently addressed in Title 11 of the Meridian City Code.
It has been detennined by the City's Legal Department that a miscellaneous application to
amend a recorded development agreement will in fact require a public hearing before the City
Council.
e. Newspaper notifications published on: December 19,2005 and January 2,2006 (for P & Z
Commission hearing) and January 23 and February 6, 2006 (for City Council hearing.)
f. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: December 19, 2005 (for P & Z
Commission hearing) and January 20, 2006 (for City Council hearing.)
g. Applicant posted notice on site by: December 26, 2005 (for P & Z Commission hearing) and
February 3,2006 (for City Council hearing.)
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): The subject property is currently vacant.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: The property to the north has been
platted as a residential phase of Champion Park. To the west, across Leslie Way, are future
office lots and a City Park in Champion Park. To the east are C-G zoned properties (Blue
Marlin/future Kohl's site) and a 5.acre parcel cun-ently zoned RUT in Ada County. To the
south, across Ustick Road, is Carol Subdivision. Carol Subdivision consists of I-acre parcels.
Some of the lots in Carol Subdivision are zoned R-2 in Meridian, some are zoned RI in Ada
County. This area is rapidly transitioning from rural to urban.
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: Single-family residential, Champion Park Subdivision, zoned R-8
2. East: Currently vacant, future commercial development, zoned C-G; existing Ada
County residence on 5-acres, has applied for annexation to C-G
3. South: Rural residential, Carol Subdivision, zoned R1 (Ada County) and R-2 (City)
4. West: City Park and future office lots in Champion Park Subdivision, zoned R-8
d. History of Previous Actions: In 2003, the City approved an annexation, preliminary plat
and a conditional use pennit for a mixed use planned development on 104.77 acres called
Parkstone Subdivision (AZ-02-033, PP-02-033 and CUP-02-049). Phases within Parkstone
Subdivision have [mal platted with the name Champion Park. The subject 11.44 acres is part
of the original Parkstone/Champion Park development. Two commercial lots and 1 mini-
storage lot were originally planned for this area.
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021IPP-O5-061 /MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-015
PAGE 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities:
1. Public Works:
Location of sewer:
Location of water:
Extension of mains in N. Leslie Way.
Extension of mains in N. Leslie Way.
Issues or concerns:
None.
2. Vegetation:
for.
3. Floodplain: N/A
4. Canals/Ditches lITigation: There are no open canals or ditches that cross the subject
site; the ditches have previously been piped.
5. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards associated with this property.
6. Proposed and Existing Zoning: R-8 (Medium-Density Residential)(9.55 acres);
C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial)(0.94 acres) and C-N (Neighborhood
Business)(0.95 acres).
7. Size of Property: 11.44 acres
f. Subdivision Plat Infonnation:
There are no existing trees on this property that need to be mitigated
1. Residential Lots:
2. Non-residential Lots:
3. Total Building Lots:
4. Common Lots: 4
5. Other Lots: 0
6. Total Lots: 54
7. Gross Density:
48
2
50
4.77 units per acre (net 6.11 d.u.lacre)
g. Landscaping
1. Width of street buffer(s): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along Ustick
Road, an arterial street (UDC 11-2B-3). A 10-foot wide street buffer is required along
Leslie Way (UDC 11-2B-3). Street buffers are not required adjacent to the other,
internal streets.
2. Width ofbuffer(s) between land uses: A 20-foot wide land use buffer is required
between CoN zoned properties and residential uses (UDC 11-2B-3). The applicant is
proposing to construct a 20-foot wide landscape buffer between proposed C-N zoned
lot and the residential lots to the north.
3. Percentage of site as open space: For the entire Champion ParklParkstone
development over 11 % of the site is being set aside for open space. 0.29 acres/2.5%
(including street buffers) and 0.57 acres/0.49% (excluding street buffers) ofthe
subject 11.44 acres is being set aside for open space.
4. Other landscaping standards: Landscaping adjacent to micro-paths should comply
with UDC 11-3B-12.
h. Amenities: City park that includes bathrooms, a tot lot, a parking lot, micro-paths, useable open
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-015
PAGE 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
space.
i. Off-Street Parking: UDC 11-3C-6.A requires single-family detached dwellings to have a 2
enclosed parking spaces (a garage) and a 20' x 20' parking pad in front of each garage.
In all commercial districts, UDC 11- 3C-6.B requires one off-street vehicle parking
space for every 500 square feet of gross floor area.
j. Proposed and Required Residential Standards:
R-8
Setbacks (in feet) Proposed
Front Living Area (to sidewalk) 15
Side Accessed Garage (to sidewalk) 15
Front Accessed Garage (to sidewalk) 20
S~ 4
Rear 12
Frontage (garage facing street) 50
Frontage (alley loaded garage) N/A
Lot Size (garage facing street) 5,000
Lot Size (alley loaded garage) N/A
k. Proposed and Required Non-Residential:
C-N
Setbacks (in feet)
Proposed
20
0
25
Front
Interior Side
Rear
Maximum Building Height
35
Required
15
15
20
4
12
50
40
5,000
4,000
Required
20
0
25
35
C-G
Setbacks (in feet) Proposed Required
Front 0 0
Interior Side 0 0
Rear 0 0
Maximum Building Height 65 65
1. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Leslie Way currently exists adjacent to
the site's western boundary and intersects Ustick Road. The applicant is not proposing any
new accesses to Ustick Road. Direct lot access to Ustick Road for Lot 34, Block 1, should be
prohibited. The internal streets are proposed as local streets with a 36-foot wide street section
(measured back of curb to back of curb) with 5-foot wide attached sidewalks. Staffis
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-0l5
PAGE 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
supportive of the proposed street system. As of the print deadline for this report, ACHD has
not provided the City with detailed analysis and conditions for this project. Staff anticipates
having ACHD's site specific conditions prior to the City Council hearing and will incorporate
those conditions into Exhibit B prior to sending the City Council report to print.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On December 16, 2005, a joint agency and departments meeting was held with service providers
in this area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian
Parks Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the
Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions and recommended actions
in Exhibit B below.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
This property is designated "Medium Density Residential" on the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map. Medium density residential areas are anticipated to contain between three and
eight dwellings per acre (see Page 95 of the Comprehensive Plan.) The proposed Preliminary Plat
includes 48 single~family lots for a gross density of 4.77 dwelling units/acre. NOTE - The 1.89
acres proposed for commercial zoning was previously approved by the City as a use exception to
CUP-02-049. In discussions with the applicant, staff requested that the applicant submit an
application to rezone the subject commercial areas, to match the previously approved commercial
land use designation. The proposed commercial area is adjacent to land designated "Mixed Use-
Regional" on the Future Land Use Map that is already zoned C-G. Although the proposed zoning
map amendment does not explicitly comply with the current Future Land Use Map, staff believes
that the Map is a guide and the subject area also meets the intent of the Mixed - Use designation
and is eligible for a commercial zone. For these reasons, staff is recommending that this area be
zoned commercial. Further, at the North Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
hearing on January 17, 2006, staff will be asking the Council to amend the Future Land Use Map
to reflect the commercial zoning/uses of these properties.
Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 3 - Consider "Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian
Travel: A Recommended Approach" from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all
land-use decisions.
This publication encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway facilities in new
construction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is safe, accessible and convenient.
Staff believes that the subject applications comply with the policies listed in the literature noted
above.
Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 6 - Require street connections between subdivisions at
regular intervals to enhance connectivity and better traffic flow.
The applicant is proposing a loop street system within this phase of the development. Two new
street connections to the existing Leslie Way are proposed. The properties to the east are
anticipated to contain commercial businesses. Staff believes that a public street connection to the
east should not be required. However, to enhance pedestrian connectivity in the area, staffis
supportive of the proposed pedestrian connection to the property to the west.
Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 13 - Review new development for appropriate
opportunities to connect to local roads and collectors in adjacent developments.
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021 /PP-OS-O61/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-0 15
PAGE 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
See analysis above.
Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 5 - Require pedestrian access COlmectors in all new
development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a
community pathway system.
The applicant is proposing to construct 5-foot wide attached sidewalks adjacent to the internal
streets. The applicant is also proposing to construct a micro-path to thefuture commercial area
to the east.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 6 - Require pedestrian access in all new development
to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood cormectivity.
See analysis above.
Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective D, Action 9 - Require new residential development to provide
permanent perimeter fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris
from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties.
Prior to house constrnction, fencing should be constrncted around the perimeter of this site.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 2 - Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors
and arterial streets.
No access to Ustick Road is being proposed; direct lot access to Ustick Road should be
prohibited.
Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 - Protect existing residential properties from
incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.
The applicant is proposing a 20joot wide land use buffer between the proposed C-N zoned lot
and the existing R-8 zoned property to the north. One of the properties to the west is currently
zoned C-G (Blue Marlin). When the commercial property(ies) to the east develop, the City should
require a land use buffer be constructed on that site to protect the subject residential lots from the
commercial users). ff land use buffers are constructed in accordance with the UDC, staflfinds
that the proposed residential and commercial uses should be compatible with each other.
Staff believes that the proposed density and zoning for this property is appropriate. Staff recommends
that the Commission and Council rely on any verbal or written testimony that may be provided at the
public hearing when determining !f the applicant's zoning and development request is appropriate for
this property.
9. ZONING ORDINANCE
a. Zoning Schedule of Use Control: Meridian City Code 11-2-A-2lists single-family attached
and detached homes as permitted uses in the R-8 zoning district. Please see Meridian City
Code ll-2B-2 for a list of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses in the C-N and C-G
zones.
b. Purpose Statement of Zones:
R-8 Medium-Density Residential: The purpose ofthe residential districts is to provide for
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021IPP-O5-06l/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-015
PAGE 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all
residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of
dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be acconunodated
within the density range.
C-N and C-G: The purpose of the Commercial District is to provide for the retail and
service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four
Districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures
accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the
location of the district in proximity to streets and highways.
c. General Standards: All of the proposed lots comply with the standard lot size and street
frontage requirements of the R-8, C-N and C-G zones established in the UDC. No dimensional
modifications are being requested for the proposed development.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
1.
2.
RZ Application: Based on the previous approval of CUP-02-049, which allowed
two commercial lots in this area as a use exception to the Parkstone/Champion Park
development, staff believes that the requested C-N and C-G zones are appropriate for
this property. Please see Exhibit D for detailed analysis of the required facts and
findings for the rezone.
The rezone legal descriptions submitted with the application (stamped on October 28,
2005 by D. Terry Peugh, PLS) shows the properties are within the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Meridian.
MI Application: UDC 11-58-3.D.2 and Idaho Code § 65-6711A provides the
City the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development
Agreement (DA) with the City that may require some written commitment for
all future uses. Hillview Development Corporation, the current owner and
developer, has previously entered into a development agreement with the City
and is requesting that certain sections of said recorded development
agreement be modified to reflect the proposal to construct additional
residences rather than a mini-storage facility. The development agreement for
this property was record on May 23, 2003 as Instrument No.1 0385229. Staff
recommends that the Commission and Council direct the City's Legal
Department to draft modifications to the recorded development agreement for
Parkstone Subdivision as follows:
. Page 4, Item 4-1 - "Construction and development for a Planned
Development consisting of ~ 299 single-family detached
building lots, ~ 76 townhouse/patio home lots, 4 office lots, 2
commercial lots, 1 mini-storage lot, 1 pocket park, 1 City
"Neighborhood" Park, and 32 common lots."
. Pages 5-9, Item B - Add the Ada County Highway District's
conditions for this phase of the development to this section.
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021 IPP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-0 15
PAGE 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
.
Page 12, Item G - Add the new case numbers for the subject
Conditional Use Permit (MCU-05-004), Preliminary Plat (PP-05-
061) and Miscellaneous application (MI-05-015) to this section.
The applicant is also roquesting that Pagos -1 6, Itom 6.^-2 be
modified to remove the requirement for the two commorci:ll 10tE: to
obt3in Condition31 UE:O Permits (CUP), unless indicated as such in
tho Unified Dovelopmont Codo (UDC). St)ff bolioVOE: th3t bec3use
the applicant i~ requesting a Þ-Jeighborhood Businm:£ (C N) zona
for Lot ðð, Block 1, 3nd i£ propm:ing to inE:tali a land use buffer in
accordance with the UDC proviEions, no futuro CUP should bo
required for th3t lot, unlecs indic3tod 3C cuch in tho UDC.
However, because Lot :i!4, Block 1, is proposød for Genor::11 Rot::1il
3nd Service Cemmorci:ll (C G), is on ::1 highly visible stroot, 3nd to
prevent any future use on Lot 3'1, from being detrimental to tho
area, Etatt recommendE that any future use on Lot 3'1, Block 1, bo
required to obt::1in 3 CUP. 5t31=( rocommondc th3t Item 5.^-2 of
tho dovolopmont ::1greement be modifiod aE notod abovo.
.
Prior to the rezone ordinance approval, a modification to the recorded Development
Agreement (Instrument No.1 03085229) shall be entered into between the City of
Meridian, property owner (at the time of annexation ordinance adoption), and the
developer. The aoolicant shall contact the Citv Attomev, Bill Nary, at 888-4433 to
initiate this process.
3.
PP Application: The proposed preliminary plat substantially complies with the
Zoning Ordinance.
Special Considerations:
LandscaDim!: The landscape plan prepared by Harvest Design, P.c., on 11-1O~05,
labeled Sheet LS-lis approved with the following modifications/notes:
. Provide landscape buffers along Ustick Road, Nakano Drive (adjacent to lots
in Champion Park Subdivision #3) and Leslie Way as depicted. The landscape
buffers along the streets shall be designed in accordance with UDC 11-3B-7.
. Provide a 20-foot wide landscape buffer (and easement) along the north side
of Lot 33, Block 1, to buffer the adjacent residential use. Materials within said
buffer should comply with UDC 11 ~3B-9.
. Provide landscaping in compliance with UDC 11-3B-12, adjacent to the
micro-path in Lot 26, Block 1.
. A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape
architect, designer, or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan
and submitted prior to City Council signature of the Final Plat. All standards
of installation shall apply as listed in UDC 11-3B-14.
Submit a landscape plan, reflecting the changes/notes mentioned above, with the
final plat application(s).
Access: The applicant is proposing to take access to this property from Leslie Way, an
existing street. No access to Ustick Road is proposed. Direct lot access to Ustick Road
should be prohibited via a note on the face of the final p1at(s). See Exhibit B below.
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021 /PP-O5-061 /MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-0 15
PAGE 10
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
House Orientation: Staff has concel11S about the orientation of the houses on Lots 8, 9,
and 14, Block 2. Generally, when reviewing the layout of a plat, staff likes for like
yards to match (e.g. - side yard of one lot to abut the side yard of another.) With the
configuration of the short cul-de-sacs in Block 2, staff recommends that the front of
these lots be restricted. The house on Lot 8, Block 2, should be oriented to the south,
to match the yards of Lots 7 and 9. The house on Lot 9, Block 2, should be oriented to
the north, to match the yards of Lots 8 and 10. Because of the size and configuration
of Lot 14, Block 2, the house shall be oriented to the east. The applicant should
designate the orientation of these lots on the face of the [mal plat. See Exhibit B
below.
Fencing: The applicant has not proposed any fencing with this development. A
detailed fencing plan should be submitted upon application of the final plat. If
pennanent fencing is not provided before issuance of a building pemllt, temporary
construction fencing to contain debris must be installed around the perimeter.
Perimeter, common open space, and micro-path fencing shall be designed according to
UDC 11-3A-7. See Exhibit B below.
Micro-paths: The micro-path in Lot 26, Block 1, shall be constructed in accordance
with UDC 11-3A-8 (construction) and UDC 11- 3B (landscaping).
Common Areas: Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the
Champion Park Home Owners' Association.
Pressure IrrÜ!ation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems
be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant should be required to use
any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is
not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required.
If a single-point connection is used, the developer will be responsible for the payment
of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City
Engineer. An underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all
landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-
15 and MCC 9-1-28.
4.
MCU Application: Staff believes that the proposed Conditional Use Pennit
Modification substantially complies with the Zoning Ordinance and will not have and
adverse impact on the use on other property. Please see Exhibit D for detailed analysis
of the required facts and findings for the Conditional Use Pennit.
Special Considerations:
Site Plan: The applicant did not submit a site plan showing how the subject 11.44
acres fit in with the overa111 OS acres of the development. Staff recommends that
the applicant provide staff with 10 full size copies and one 8.5" x 11" copy of a
revised site plan that shows the entire Parkstone/Champion Park development. as
proposed. Further. staff recommends that the applicant bring a copv of said
revised site plan to the Planning & Zoning Commission hearim!.
b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the subject applications RZ-05-
021. PP-OSw061. MCU-OS-004 and MI-OS-OlS. with the conditions listed in Exhibit B of the
Staff Report for the hearing date of January 5.2006.
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-05-021/PP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-O5-0l5
PAGE II
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
] 1. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. Preliminary Plat (dated: 9-29-05)
2. Landscape Plan (dated: 11-10-05)
3. Site Plan (dated: 1-4-06)
B. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Parks Department
6. Sanitary Service Company
7. Ada County Highway District
8. Central District Health Department
C. Rezone Legal Descriptions
D. Required Findings from Zoning Ordinance
Champion Park Addition Subdivision RZ-O5-021/PP-O5-061/MCU-O5-004/MI-05-0 15
PAGE 12
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
A. Drawings
1. Preliminary Plat (dated: 9-29-05)
..-:~~..,,:;..,~,T..;~.~~~::T'~~:e~::J~i:;I:'£~! ~~~1,:~~~:;~' ".,t:i~:.~-J;,~'~:~;,~, 1 ~J~:-:llì
....,"'.~:'.:;:.;:;."., ".,,:,.:;;;~,::;';:.." "::~,':"..:.~' """øouRioB. ""-01.<1""""'1'"" '.,d-er'
CII!W~-1-......~"j'Hqj. i i?¥ii.Oì".3!,"""'-,~--~' ,-' , '~f lI1IV~O~~~"'tI:J., ~; ~ a..;
.~,-" ,~,
I
I
I
I
I
'\
it H.. - ^ ~ .
"I~"~}1n,~f
,J¡B.ul.tl
,I.~¡FUNI,'I!
H g a ~ n n ~ ~ HI
I ¡ ¡ ~ j , ¡. . Ii! 1 ¡
~ '. ">'
" : i il'.
I ~ '
'~3 ~B!~
I,. ~ 1i!nl'
hn~lh~!d
1111' ,: I
, I ì i ¡ i I I
'I ! j, I I
II ¡ I ' : ' , 1 I
ì~[-~: .
'I' (.
, J.
I > II i
I r Iii ~
P ~
, j' I"" I'~
I, I J1,
'1",' ¡"..t~?
, r"I¡~
, ,-H
I ! I Ii'
.,. I;
II": '~;" <
l,ì
., I~!~''"' ~~..
i~;; ~iU'
.d "M '111
Ii" 'Pie
a;fiLl.1
:&f~~tl
I HI:! 01; øl
I;~H' .~ .
fIi-..if !H.!,
;d.
1;;1 ~f
~~ ~
~'jl w.
i I~ :i!
. 6~'~lëJ;J
I~~
I~!
n~
ilh
r~¡
¡¡~è
~,
, ""..~..=--'---
~
.",-~' ". ", ", i
m
A"
r-r7----~ (;)
: 'I I """1 '.~ , 6 i'
-, .I..J I L",j 'C ¡:'
'.. ""'-" ..,' ..:...
[._-
..,-_.., ",--,--,--
---------',-
.. .. """.. ""-~ ...--.....
Exhibit A - Page I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
2.
Landscape Plan (dated 11-10-05)
,., [- - J --== I~
IJ II d I, ~
I Idall¡
~J I, ,:,¡ .c,
I I " ;,~-
,~¡ II
J ¡ .i~! .
n
L:
i
U [J
r'l
~-'-
[~- ------¡.".~
.!.~t!.. , ,! ,," .
- hh"'-. .!1~~..-~~;~;
j.-...--:¡--,..ilii!i
I ¡m:tI.~ '-I~I!!' :"-"" "
, ~,h¡ I I. ~
'. n ,I mh ~ ~,
~fl~li ;~
D
--------...-
--"--'.'.--'--.-----..
----",,------- --
ÁVJA -3nSJ1 N
~;
!~
--_____--nn- ..-"""'"..'-...'-
- ------"-'~--'---""_.".. --
Exhibit A - Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
3. Site Plan - (dated 1.4-06)
~
r- -.--- l----- EI
I n-...-..~-= >1 [] -
"""""" -""" ~:
""~-~..,..._.,,,.
-..- ¡
-........
-.. ---- ~I.,~.-.}¡!/\I'" i'C~ I
/
¡
,
..
f
;¡
"
l
-..
I
I
~/
r
I
'-'--"'-
-L-...
~-CJ
- I!- : 1- I
~;
I
If
-1]
~~.
li
- - -"----"-""'------.-_..-....,,
Exhibit A - Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14, 2006
B. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS-PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP-OS-061)
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.S
1.1.6
The preliminary plat labeled as PRE Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Engineering Solutions, LLP, dated
September 29, 200S (revised 1O~20-0S) is approved, with the conditions listed herein. All
comments and conditions of the accompanying Rezone (RZ-OS.021) application, Miscellaneous
(MI-OS-015) application, and Conditional Use Permit (MCU-05-004) application shall also be
considered conditions of the Preliminary Plat (PP-05-061).
The landscape plan prepared by Harvest Design, P.C, on 11-10-05, labeled Sheet LS-lis
approved with the following modifications/notes:
. Provide landscape buffers along Ustick Road, Nakano Drive (adjacent to lots in
Champion Park Subdivision #3) and Leslie Way as depicted. The landscape buffers
along the streets shall be designed in accordance with UDC 11-3B-7.
. Provide a 20-foot wide landscape buffer (and easement) along the north side of Lot
33, Block 1, to buffer the adjacent residential use. Materials within said buffer shall
comply with UDC 11-3B-9.
. Provide landscaping in compliance with UDC 11-3B-12, adjacent to the micro-path
in Lot 26, Block 1.
. A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape architect,
designer, or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan and submitted
prior to City Council signature of the Final Plat. All standards of installation shall
apply as listed in UDC 11-3B-14.
Submit a landscape plan, reflecting the changes/notes mentioned above, with the final
plat application(s).
The future house on Lot 8, Block 2, shall be oriented to the south, to match the yards of Lots 7
and 9. The future house on Lot 9, Block 2, shall be oriented to the north, to match the yards of
Lots 8 and 10. Because ofthe size and configuration of Lot 14, Block 2, the future house shall be
oriented to the east. The applicant shall designate the orientation of these lots on the face of the
final plat.
The applieant has flot proposed aflY feaeing with this àøvøI83møÐt. The applicant has
volunteered to construct a 6-foot tall vinvl fence alone: the east property line, A detailed
fencing plan should be submitted upon application of the final plat. If permanent fencing is not
provided before issuance of a building permit, temporary construction fencing to contain debris
must be installed around the perimeter. Perimeter, common open space, and micro-path fencing
shall be designed according to UDC 11-3A~7.
The micro-path in Lot 26, Block 1, shall be constructed in accordance with UDC 11-3A-8
(construction) and UDC 11-3B (landscaping).
Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the Champion Park Home
Owners' Association.
Exhibit B - Page I
1.1.7
1.1.8
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.2.5
1.2.6
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
2.1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
Place a note on the face of the final plates), stating that direct lot access to Ustick Road is
prohibited.
Underground, pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this development.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS~PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP-O5-061)
A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape and subdivision ordinance and as
noted in this report, shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application(s).
Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision
pursuant to UDC 11-3A-17.
All areas approved as open space shall be free of wet ponds or other such nuisances. All
stonnwater detention facilities incorporated into the approved open space are subject to UDC 11-
3A~18 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and trees. Sand, gravel or other non-vegetated
surface materials shall not be used in open space lots, except as pennitted under UDC 11-3B.
Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed
such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as
proposed by staff. If the stonnwater detention facility cannot be incorporated into the approved
open space and still meet the standards of UDC 11 ~3A-18, then the applicant shall relocate the
facility. This may require losing a developable lot or developable area. It is the responsibility of
the developer to comply with ACHD, City of Meridian and all other regulatory requirements at
the time of final construction.
Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or tenus of the approved annexation and
conditional use does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance.
Preliminary plat approval shall be subj ect to the expiration provisions set forth in UDC 11-6B- 7.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MCU-O5-004)
g1:lBmit 10 full size eoI3ies aBd OBS g .5" x 11" eopy of a re';issd sits plan that shows the eBtire
ParkstoÐe/Champion Park developæeflt, as proposed. Fl:lrther, tbe ap¡ë!lieant shall bring a copy of
said revised sitø plaB to tbe Planning & ZaRing CommissioB bearing.
All comments and conditions of the accompanying Rezone (RZ-O5-02l) application,
Miscellaneous (MI-O5-0l5) application and Preliminary Plat (PP-O5-06l) application shall also
be considered conditions of the Conditional Use Pennit (MCU-O5-004).
All future use(s) on Lot 34, Block 1, shall obtain Conditional Use Pennit approval prior to
construction and operation.
2. Public Works Department
Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via of mains in N. Leslie Way that
were installed with a previous phase of Champions Park. The applicant shall install all mains
Exhibit B - Page 2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
necessary to provide service; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public
Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to
provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-
grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in confonnance of City of
Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications.
Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in Champions Park
Subdivision. The applicant shall be responsible to install all water mains necessary to serve this
development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works.
The applicant has not indicated who will own and operate the pressure irrigation system in this
proposed development. If it is to be maintained as a private system, plans and specifications will
be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part ofthe construction plan review. A "draft
copy" of the operations and maintenance manual will be required prior to plan approval with the
"final draft" being required prior to final plat signature on the last phase of this project.
If it is to be owned and maintained by an Irrigation District then evidence of a license agreement
shall be submitted prior to scheduling of a pre-construction meeting.
The City of Meridian requires that pressurized iITigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (UDC 11-3B6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or
well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the COmmon areas prior to
signature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
All existing structures that do not meet setback requirements or zoning ordinance shall be
removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from
domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-
domestic purposes such as landscape iuigation.
Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed,
drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final
Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building pennits.
A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths,
pressurized iuigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as detennined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat
per Resolution 02-374.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Pennitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Pennitting
that may be required by the Anny Corps of Engineers.
Exhibit B - Page 3
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.17
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I-foot above.
One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by
the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fITe hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are
detennined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light
contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior to
commencing installations.
3. Fire Department
One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for
duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500 feet
apart. International Fire Code Appendix C.
Acceptance of the water supply for fITe protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and
water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing.
Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 Y2" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications.
d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers when spacing pennits. .
e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements ofthe IFC Section 509.5.
h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet of the project.
The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150 feet in length that is not
provided with an outlet shall be required to have an approved turn around.
All entrance and internal roads and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside
radius.
Operational fITe hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all
weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site.
The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards cross section requirements and
shall have a clear driving surface, available at all times, which is 20' wide. Streets with less than
a 29' street width shall have no parking. Streets with less than 33' shall have parking only on one
side. These measurements shall be based on the face of curb dimension. The roadway shall be
able to accommodate an imposed load of 75,000 GVW.
Exhibit B - Page 4
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
4.1
5.1
6.1
7.1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14, 2006
Commercial and office occupancies will require a fIre-flow consistent with the International Fire
Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D.
The proposed 48-10t subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a total
estimated population of 139 residents at build out.
Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure for the commercial
buildings.
Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy.
The Fire Dept. has concerns about the ability to address the project and have the addresses visible
from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact Vicki Heugly at 898-5500 to
address this concern prior to the public hearing.
All aspects of the building systems (including exiting systems), processes & storage practices
shall be required to comply with the International Fire Code.
All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150' of a paved surface as
measured around the perimeter of the building.
Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fIre apparatus access road, as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants
and mains shall be provided where required by the code offIcial. For buildings equipped throughout
with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or
903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
.
For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m).
.
For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet
(183 m).
4. Police Department
Any interior fencing shall allow visibility from the street or shall not exceed four feet in height if
solid fencing is used.
5. Parks Department
No comments.
6. Sanitary Service Company
SSC has no comments related to this application.
7. Ada County Highway District
Dedicate a total of 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Us tick Road abutting the parcel.
The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the
applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to
Exhibit B - Page 5
7.7
7.8
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
issuance of a building pennit (or other required pennits), whichever occurs first Allow up to 30
business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The
owner wi1J be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to
existing ACHD right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee
administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with the ACHD Ordinance in effect at that
time (currently Ordinance #200), if funds are available.
7.2
Construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 41.feet úom the centerline of Us tick
Road.
7.3
Construct the internal streets as 36-foot street sections with rolled curb, gutter and 5-foot attached
concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed.
7.4
Construct two cul-de-sac turnarounds without center islands within the subdivision, as proposed.
Construct the turnarounds to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet
7.5
Construct one knuckle without a center island, as proposed.
7.6
Construct a 30-foot wide shared curb return type driveway that intersects Leslie Drive
approximately l40-feet north of Us tick Road to serve Lot 33 and Lot 34 of Block 1, as proposed.
Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of Leslie Drive.
Place a note on the final plat stating that direct lot access is prohibited on Ustick Road.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
8. Central District Health Department
After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for
central sewage and central water.
The following plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &
Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage and central water.
Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
It is recommended that stonn water be pre-treated prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent
impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the
design ofthis project should obtain current best management practices for stonn water disposal
and design a stonn water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water
degradation.
Exhibit B - Page 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
C. Rezone Legal Descriptions
I
IDAHO
SURVEY
GROUP
450 East w..tCrlowcr 5t.
Stilt€! I 50
Meridian. Idaho 83642
,,-.---"- ---
Phone (lOB) 1146.8570
Fill( (208) 884.5399
Proposed CN Zone
Proposed Cbamplon Park Additioll
A pan:d of1and being a portion ofthe SE ~ of Section 32, Township -4 North,
Range I East, R.M., Meridian, Ada County, tdooo, more particularly dcscribed as
follows: Commencing a1 the Y. comer COll1lT1on to the said Section 32 and Section 5,
Township 3 North, Range 1 East, 8.M., ftom which the SW corner of Mid Section 32
bears North 89"'43' I T' East, 2655.40 feet; thence along lhe aout:h line of the SE Y. of said
Section 32 North 89°44'04" East, 1124.23 feet, thence North 00"15'56'. West, 200_68
feet to the REAl, POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence continuing North 00°15 '56" West, 56.25 feet to a point of cUl'Vature;
Thence 41.48 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of
300.00 feet, a delta angle of 07°55. 22". and a long chord bearing North 04° 13'38" West,
41.45 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 08° II '19.' West. 82_77 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence 7.07 foct along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of
166.00 feet, a delta angle of 02"'26'20", and a long chord bearing North 09°24'28" West.
7.07 feet;
Thence North 74"'15.19'. East, 61.88 feet to a poiitt of curvature;
Thence 21.16 reet along the an: ofa curve to thc left, said curve ru.viDg a radius of
50.00 feet, a de1ta angle of24°14'36". iIIld a long chord bearing North 62°08'01" East,
21.00 feet;
Thence South 39"59'17" East, 25.00 feet;
Thence North 89°58'28" East, 126~83 feet to a point on the East Hne of said
SB 114
Thence along said line South 00°01'32;' East, 193.991èet;
Thence 80utl1 90"00'00" West, 204.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. "
Containing 0.95 acres, more or less.
SO914\S0914-cn.doc
- Pr<'(e~$ïOnðt "-<loa 5!fveyor.s
-"m._._,_~.._..-.-
Exhibit C - Page I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAi'"F REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
I
IDAHO
SURVEY
GROUP
1-'4.~O EaSt Watettower St-
Su¡œ 150
Meridía.n, Idaho 83642
----------- .-.-- ---
------- - .----- -------- --- ----
Phone (208) 8'16-8570
FlU" (208) 884.5399
----- ---
October- 28. 2005
Proposed CG Zone
Proposed Champion Park Addition
A parcel ofland being a portion of the SE 'it of Section 32, Township 4 North,
Range I East, 8.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as
fOllows: . Commencing BIllie Y4 comer common 1.0 the said Section 32 and Section 5,
Township 3 North. Range 1 East. B.M.. &om which the SW comer of said SeCtion 32
bean North 89"43'1'7" East, 2655.40 feet; thence along the south ineoflhe SE Y. ofsajd
Section 32 North 89<'44 '04" East, 1124.23 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence North 00"15'56" West. 200_68 feet;
Thence North 90"00'00" East, 204.84 feet to a point on the East line of said
SE 1/4;
Thence along said line South 00"01'32" East, 199.73 feet to the East 1116 comer
common to Section 5 and the said Section 32;
Thence along the south line: of the SE V. of said Section 32, South 89"44'04"
West, 204.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNiNG. Containing 0.94 acres, mOTe or less.
SO914\S0914-cg.doc
PI.(,fe~t¡o£1al laud :.l'rveyl')\,,~
~"".,,~._---,,-, ._"
Exhibit C - Page 2
tT1
><
=.
g:
n
I
-c
~
(Q
(')
w
1t~
~
*'
CHAMPION N 74"15'19"£ \ ~~.
PARK SUBO, NO. :5 61.88'
A-8
" ) I~-
~J~---
~
PRCFOSED eN
D.95 AaIS
in
N
:8
~: NI90'OO'OO"E- 204.84'
!æ l: CO ~
I ~ 0.t4 It.RES !
I ,
RPOB ~
32 1/4 E. USl1CK ROAD CG ZONE
~ N 8i#\'o,i~" -m¡¡s-- -.. I . 5 89',,'04 'ii 204.00" I
R1 . R-2 I
, I
100
50
a
100
~
SCALE IN FEET
200
300
I
~
~
en
-
------,
I
S 39"59'1ï'E .
25.00' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-----_J
jooJ
pj
~ RUT
en
C-G
CU~e: DATA
CUR>{ RHJftJS DElTA NIC TAHGOO CHORD aiOfiD Btro
1:1 300.00 CTS5'22. 41.48 20.77 41.-46 N Of1J"38" w
C2 166.00 C2'25"20' 1,m 3.SJ 1.01 N 00'2~'28" W
OJ 50.00 24'1~'3&' 21.16 IC.7~ 2I.OD N 62'0Ø'OI. E
n
::J
-<
0
"tj
3::
!TJ
;>:!
6
:;
Z
'"0
r:-
~
z
Z
0
0
~
>
E¡
~
tT1
Z
-3
rn
-3
?
,.."
,.."
;>:!
tT1
""C
0
¡o
-3
"tj
0
¡o
-3
::J:
tT1
::J:
tT1
>
¡o
z
0
0
>
-3
tT1
0
-r¡
"tj
tT1
ttI
¡o
c:
>
¡o
-<
I; iel
æa~p
. § 'I'
¡¡¡ S I~I
~~ ;If
... !I
I
I ~I
! ~i
!I ~i
nI '..1l1li'
- IOIU/llO'-
""".... 00II14
sø:r I..,.,
."""
RZ
N
0
0
'"
CITY OF MERID[AN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY [4,2006
D. Required Findings from Zoning Ordinance
1. Rezone Findings:
Exhibit 0 - Page I
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation
and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation
and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive
plan;
The applicant is proposing to zone 0.95 acres to C-N and 0.94 acres to C-G. These areas
were previously approved by the City for commercial use as a use exception with CUP-
02-049. Although the proposed zoning map amendment does not comply with the current
Future Land Use Map, the Council finds that this area be zoned commercial to reflect the
previous use exception approval. Further, at the North Meridian Area Comprehensive
Plan Amendment hearing on January 17, 2006, staff will be asking the Council to amend
the Future Land Use Map to reflect the commercial designations of these properties. The
Council finds that the proposed map amendment will comply with all other applicable
provisions of the comprehensive plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and
Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report.
The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed
district, specifically the purpose statement;
The Council finds that there are several uses that are allowed and conditionally allowed
within the requested zoning districts of CAN and C-G. If the applicant complies with the
conditions outlined in the modified development agreement, the modified conditional use
pennit and the proposed preliminary plat, the Council finds that the proposed commercial
lots/districts will be in compliance with the regulations outlined in each specific district.
The accompanying plat, conditional use pennit and proposed development agreement
modifications, demonstrate that the land will be developed with lot sizes, uses and other
dimensional requirements that conform to the proposed zoning designations.
2.
3.
The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare.
4,
The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of
services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City
including, but not limited to, school districts; and,
The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse
impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to
this site.
The annexation is in the best ofinterest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
5.
The C-N and C-G zoning amendments will provide commercial lots that are similar in
nature to existing and proposed commercial development in the vicinity. The Council
finds that all essential services are available or will be provided by the developer to the
subject property and will not require unreasonable expenditure of public funds. The
applicant is proposing to develop the land in general compliance with the City's
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with the findings listed above, the Council finds that
Re.zoning ofthis property to C-N and C-G would be in the best interest ofthe City.
2. Preliminary Plat Findings:
In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,
the decision-making body shall make the following findings:
1.
The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
The Council tinds that the proposed application is in substantial compliance with the
adopted Comprehensive Plan, and the land use designation change proposed for this
property with the North Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Counic1
supports the proposed plat layout and proposed density as they comply with the
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC. Please see Comprehensive Plan
Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report.
2.
Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to
accommodate the proposed development;
3.
The Council finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed
development. (See finding Items 3 and 4 above under Rezone Findings for more details.)
The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the
City's capital improvement program;
4.
Because the developer is installing sewer, water, and utilities for the development at their
cost, the Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital
improvement funds.
There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
The Council finds that supporting services are available to support the proposed
development. The Cotnnùssion and Council rely upon comments from the public service
providers (i.e., police, fire, ACHD, etc.) to detennine this Eroding. (See Eroding "Items 3
and 4 above under Armexation Findings above, and the Agency Comments and
Conditions in Exhibit B for more detail.)
The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general
welfare; and
5.
The Council is not aware of any health, safety or environmental problems associated with
the development of this subdivision. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis.
Staff recommends that the Cotnnùssion and Council reference any public testimony that
may be presented to detennine whether or not the proposed subdivision may cause health,
safety or environmental problems of which staff is unaware.
The development preserves significant natural. scenic or historic features.
6.
The Council is unaware of any natural, scenic or historic features on this site. Therefore,
the Council frods that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or
damage of any natural, scenic or historic feature(s) of major importance.
Exhibit D - Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY ]4,2006
Exhibit D - Page 3
2. CUP Findings:
The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit request upon
the following:
1.
That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the
dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located.
The Council finds that the site is large enough to accommodate all required parking,
landscaping, loading and other standard regulations required by the ODC.
That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan
and in accord with the requirements of this Title.
The Council finds that the proposal meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan as
listed in Section 8 of this report. See Rezone Findings #1 and 2 above.
That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area,
2.
3.
4.
The Council finds that the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the single-
family attached and detached uses will be compatible with other uses in the general
neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the vicinity as to not
adversely change the character of the area. Specific uses are not proposed within the C-N
and C-G lots at this time. The applicant is constructing a 20-foot wide land use buffer
between the C~N zoned lot and the residentially zoned lots to the north, staff finds that
the future operation of a commercial business on this lot should be compatible with the
neighborhood (provided the applicant complies with all ODC provisions.) Because the
proposed C~G zoned lot is a general retail and service commercial lot that is on a highly
visible intersection, the Council is requiring that any and all future use( s) on the two
commercial lots be required to obtain CUP approval prior to construction and operation.
Future building heights, parking layouts, landscape buffer widths and other dimensional
standards will be analyzed with future applications to ensure compliance with the ODC.
That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity.
The Council frods that the proposed development will not adversely affect other property
in the vicinity if the applicant complies with all Preliminary Plat, Development
Agreement and CUP conditions and constructs all improvements and operates the use in
accordance with the ODC standards.
That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
The Council finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation are available to the
subject property. Please refer to other comments prepared by the Meridian Fire
Department, Police Department, Parks Department, Sanitary Services Company and
ACHD.
5.
6.
That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities
and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
7.
8.
Exhibit D - Page 4
The Council finds that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water
mains into the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The
applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees.
That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors.
The Council finds that the proposed development will not involve uses that will create
nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. The
Council does not believe that the amount of traffic or noise generated will be detrimental
to the general welfare of the public.
That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
The Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or
damage of any natural feature(s) of major importance.