Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgency CommentsPage 1 of 2 Machelle Hill From: Joe Silva Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:43 PM To: Cc: Joe Silva; 'Lars Anderson' RE C,EI VE 1) QTY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICr 'sstanfield@mseng.us; C. Caleb Hood; Machelle Hill; Nancy Radford; Sheree Finch; Tara Green; Jennifer Veatch; bairdt@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: RE: Regency at River Valley- Revised From: Joe Silva Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:28 PM To: Lars Anderson Cc: sstanfield@mseng.us; Caleb Hood (hoodc@meridiancity.org); Machelle Hill; Nancy Radford; Sheree Finch; Tara Green; Jenny Veatch (veatchj@meridiancity.org); bairdt@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: RE: Regency at River Valley Lars Anderson Subject: Regency at River Valley- Revised I have reviewed the proposed project for site access with Caleb Hood of the Planning Department. In order to provide site access to meet the requirements of the International Fire Code three modifications will have to be done to the proposed plan. 1. A 26' wide emergency access road will have to be provided on the Southeast corner of the project leading out onto Alleys Way. The primary access and the recommended secondary access point must be separated by a minimum of 600' on your project. Note: The two access points must be separated by a minimum distance of % the diagonal measurement. In the case of Regency at River Valley that measurement is approximately 1200'. 2. For the same reasons as stated above, the project will have to be connected at two points to public roads to serve the project. One connection point will have to be to Eagle Rd. via River Valley Street on the West end of the project. A second connection point to the project will have to be from the intersection of Alleys Way and River Valley, with Alleys Way/Records Drive extending either to the North to Ustick or to the South to Fairview. 3. Because of concerns associated with congestion on Eagle Rd. the second point of access mentioned above will have to be provided before the 204 units can be built. The project could be conditioned to limit construction to 100 units until a second point of access can be placed in service meeting the requirements as outlined in comment one. Joe Silva Fire Marshal Meridian Fire From: Lars Anderson[mailto:lars.anderson@bachhomes.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 3:00 PM To: Joe Silva CC: sstanfield@mseng.us Subject: Regency at River Valley 3/6/2008 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Silva - I am checking in with you to see if you have had the opportunity to review our site plan again and reconsider the fire access issues. We have reviewed the ACHD standards for intersections and I have attached a table (AASHTO) that shows we would need 250 feet from the proposed intersection to the access point on Alley's Way. We only have 134 feet of property that fronts Alley's Way. Therefore we cannot comply with the request for an additional access without violating the standards. If you have an opinion on this subject, we would greatly appreciate a reply in that we are in town tomorrow (Thursday). We are trying to meet with staff on Thursday afternoon and your comments would help us in discussing this matter. Thank you, Lars _Lars _Anderson Bach Homes, L.L.C. Project Manager (801) 567-3029 (Direct Line) (801) 566-2224 (W) (801) 566-2203 (F) I_ars.ande_rson(,-� bachhomes.net 3/6/2008 Page 1 of 1 Machelle Hill From: Sonya Watters Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10.-08 AM To: Machelle Hill Subject: FW: Merdian - Regency at River Valley Importance: High Attachments: Bach .Driveway.Ltr.031908.pdf From: Andrew Wilk [mailto:ajwilk@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:29 PM To: Anna Canning; Sonya Watters Cc: 'Lars Anderson' Subject: Merdian - Regency at River Valley Importance: High RECEIVPI} MAR 2 0 2008 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office Anna, Attached is the letter I mentioned in our conversation today. I will be unable to attend the continued hearing for AZ-08-003 H CUP-08-004, however I would like to have the attached letter included in our testimony. Thanks, Andy 3/20/2008 4 CENTERCCAL PROPERTIES. LLC March 19, 2008 Ms. Anna Borchers Canning, AICP Planning Director City of Meridian 660 E. Watertower Street, Suite 202 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: AZ-08-003 // CUP-08-004 VIA IA EMAIL: canninga @ meridiancity.org watterss @meridiancity.org Continued Hearing — Regency at River- Valley Dear Anna: OREGON 7455 SW BRIDGEPORT ROAD SUITE 205 TIGARD, OR 97224 PHONE 503,968,8940 FAX 503.968.8047 CALIFORNIA 1960 E GRAND AVENUE SUITE 400 EL SEGUNDO. CA 90245 PHONE 310.563.6900 FAX 310.563.6905 WWW.CENTERCAL.COM RECEIVED MAR 2 0 2008 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office We recently obtained the revised site plan dated March 11, 2008 for The Regency at River Valley project. During the P&Z hearing on March 6, 2008 we expressed our concems regarding the proposed access points on E. River Valley Street (future) and encouraged the commission and council to require the applicant to coordinate with the southerly neighboring property owner for the River Valley access points so they appropriately correspond with the development to the south. Though CenterCal is not currently the owner of the property immediately south of the applicant's property, there is a likelihood this may occur in the future. Such area was diagramed in our approved Schematic Master Plan (AZ-07-012). It is our understanding that strongly discourages offset driveways, and where offsets are allowed, a minimum of ISO feet 4 om centerline to centerline be maintained. As you can see from the attached composite diagram neither of these standards are achieved by the applicant. We stand ready to coordinate with the applicant to find a workable solution, but wish to bring this matter to both the staff and commission's attention, so the commission and council approvals of the Project, if any, may reflect a condition to satisfactorily resolve this matter. Thank you in advance for your assistance, and should you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Andrew Wilk vt Vice President of Development cc: Lars Anderson — Bach Homes ------------- ry I !I EAGLE ROAD AS PER 77D � •' _ Iu.�z k sp • i� I j `E BACH HOMES THE REGENCY 11650 smm 57,7E AT RIVER VALLEY P EL 1 M l NARY Mom Ulm $.no MERIDIAN, IDAHO SITE PLAN C 0 /11 �/-W E IDIAN- of Review Requested (check all that ❑ Accessory Use ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Certificate of Zoning Compliance ❑ Conditional Use Permit Minor Modification ❑ Design Review Private Street Property Boundary Adjustment ❑ Short Plat ❑ Temporary Use Certificate of Zoning Compliance ❑ Time Extension (Director) ❑ Vacation ❑ Other Applicant Information _ Planni tment ADMINISTRATIVE REVIE E� APR 2 9 2008 G� OF MERIDIAN STAFF USE ONLY: File number(s): P,S ` Q & -004 Project name: 9�cl,pflC,c_1 &4 K 6 YeK 1/4 l l et. CVCV15� J Date filed: Date complete: Assigned Planner: _ &6Y1y C_ V (, A-4f,1 S Related files: AIt- -nZ- rv-)2 ri /P-ems._ , VAJP_-Ci8' Q 2 7 - Applicant name: SCOTT 5115,KELEX-10t (fXAJON f SIAMF►Ft�j L.nc. Phone: 1I51_L-Od56 Applicant address: 31y $1AC%DLA St CAL,pw,51-` LD Zip: _ S?36o s Applicant's interest in property: ❑ Own ❑ Rent ❑ Optioned Other o►,a,nc.` S �h�►w.cc� tog% Cwt4r,LLE , J Ae0«%trc Owner name:_ (3AL%k Nh�S (L� a\� RAWn►u.c n45R ��c Ea 4 n►ctk,ut �--- � 5 Phone: gVl-�1.�•��a•y Owner address:_ kk6so S. t(XAAM, vT $40d0 �yoa0 Zip: Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): (Ste „"aVct A \0192A� Firm name: Address: Phone: Primary contact is: Z Applicant ❑ Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Other Contact name: to GS o ^ � Sal NV% 4 t e ',A C G�t) S,,'4 E-mail: SSkp.rn;Le`,.J `N�Sthy US ect Property Information Zip: Phone: 4 S q- 0 2 S 6 Fax: 451�- Oq}9 Location/streetaddress: Z 500 N. t#it,L6 120 Assessor's parcel number(s): S lt U `F Z 33 91V S\t Vy ] 33 q 2 0 Township, range, section: i 3 is Rtt Sd C, y, Total acreage: 5 t 2 Ac. Current land use: L►001r Current zoning district: Rv'C (:.. P wcc s'. C- t_ 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 (Rev. 414108) Project Description Project/sobdi*isionname: R.e G V t\I Ly AT 'V ALLIC'i General description of proposed project/request: P ; a p-k e Sk { e e k k p S %jP p V A r,, 2 UL\ %1 ^ _ Proposed zoning district(s): U C. Acres of each zone proposed: P=,k U - 12.0 Lo Type of use proposed (check all that apply): Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Industrial ❑ Other Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): See Cup Sobw�+NQ� pdcko.b� Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? R\ A Which irrigation district does this property lie within? N A Primary irrigation source: 1A A Secondary: NSA Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): NIA Residential Project Summary (if applicable) t\11 14 Number of residential units: 2T N \A Number of building lots: Nt4 Number of common and/or other lots: N \A Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only):.3 u`t }u\&l 1 Bedroom: Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): Minimum property size (s.f): Gross density (DU/acre-total land): Percentage of open space provided: Percentage of useable open space: 2 or more Bedrooms: Proposed building height: _ Average property size (s.f.): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelling(s) proposed: ❑ Single-family ❑ Townhomes ❑ Duplexes ❑ Multi -family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable)yJ \A Number of building lots: Gross floor area proposed: Hours of operation (days and hours): Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: Total number of employees: Building: Other lots: Existing (if applicable): Building height: Paving: Maximum number of employees at any one time: Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): Seating capacity: Total number of parking spaces provided: Number of compact spaces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: SCDU SIAPIFtEU) w\M01SGa1 S'TAraJFLe L r) Applicant signature: p A Date: 14 �d 2 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 Regency at River Valley (revised) The Commission heard these applications at the public hearing on March 6, 2008. At the meeting on March 6`h, the applicant decided to withdraw the Variance (VAR-08-001) request for a temporary access to SH 5REagle Road. At that meeting, the Commission voted to continue the project until the March 20`h meeting so staff could update the conditions of approval (Staff had originally included draft conditions of approval because Staff was recommending several significant changes to the site plan); so the site plan could be revised by the applicant; and so comments/conditions could be obtained from ACHD. On March 6`h, the maker of the motion for continuance stated that they would like to see the following changes made to the site plan: 1) Add an emergency access only driveway to Allys Way; 2) Provide a 10 foot wide multi -use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments; and 3) Remove the temporary access to Eagle Road. The maker of the motion also stated that their recommendation for approval would be prefaced on the applicant and NA47D reaching an agreement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral. The Commission supported the Variance (VAR-08-002) request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan, which staff has reviewed and made modifications to the staff report accordingly. Revisions to the site plan are as follows: • An emergency only access has been added on the east property boundary to Allys Way, as required by the Fire Department. A gate will be installed across the entry that will only be accessible by emergency personnel. • A 5-foot wide landscape buffer has been added along the north property boundary adjacent to parking, as requested by staff. • A 10-foot wide meandering multi -use pathway has been added along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, as required by the Park's Department. • Bicycle parking has been added to the west side of the clubhouse as requested by Staff. Structures along the southern boundary are still shown within the easement for the Stokesberry Lateral; however, the applicant states that NMID is amenable to relocating the easement and lateral 20' further to the south, in which case the buildings would be outside of the new easement. The applicant withdrew their request for a variance for a temporary access point to Eagle Road at the last Commission meeting. Without the request for access to Eagle Road, Staff is supportive of the annexation of the commercial portion of the property at this time. A private street application for internal streets has not yet been submitted by the applicant; staff is requesting that this be submitted prior to the City Council meeting. Changes to the staff report since the March 6`h version are in bold, italics and underline. Note: Comments still have not been received from ACHD. WaltmanlBrownine Plaza The Commission previously heard the subject applications on February 21, 2008. At that meeting, the Commission voted to continue the project until tonight's meeting in order to have sufficient time to obtain comments from ACHD and to give the applicant time to review the Development Agreement provisions recommended by Staff. The applicant submitted a written response to the original DA provisions proposed by Staff.` Staff has updated the DA provisions in Section 10 of the staff report, including some of the requests by the applicant, and has met with the applicant to discuss these changes. The applicant submitted another written response to the DA provisions that you should have, based on the updated provisions. On February 25`h, City and ACHD Staff met with the applicant to discuss traffic issues in this area. During that meeting the current access limitations and a long-term solution for traffic in this area were discussed. (A loop frontage road was briefly discussed, but was not considered as a viable option due to the State's plan for the new westbound on -ramp onto I-84. This new on - ramp will take a substantial portion of the property due east of the subject site.) ACHD and City Staff both expressed an interest in having Corporate Drive extended to the north to connect with SW Yh Avenue. If this connection is made, a viable secondary access to this site will be established. A solution that ACHD staff offered up to get the CorporatelYh connection made, but not put the entire burden on the applicant, was to enter into a development agreement with the developer to establish an extraordinary impact overlay district in this area. If an extraordinary impact fee area is established, the developer of the subject property, in concert with ACHD, would build the Corporate Drive extension (and any other "necessary" roadway improvements) and then be reimbursed through extraordinary impact fees that are generated as buildings are constructed in this area. Unlike ACHD staff, however, City Staff believes that the Corporate Drive extension should occur prior to another 8, 000 vehicle trips being added in this area, not after. City Staff continues to believe that the extension of Corporate Drive to the north, across the Ten Mile Lateral is a critical roadway improvement in this area that should be constructed sooner rather than later. Staff is recommending that no more than 75, 000 square feet of gross building area be allowed before the Corporate/S. W. S`h connection is made. Staff recommends that the Commission decide what roadway improvements and DA provisions should be included with this development. Development Agreement modifications: • No building permits shall be issued or construction traffic allowed on this site until the construction related to the Waltman Lane/Meridian Road/Main Street intersection is completed OR Corporate Drive is extended across the Ten Mile Creek and is connected to Waltman Lane. (If the extension of Corporate Drive is completed prior to the Waltman Lane/Meridian Road/Main Street intersection and construction begins on this site, no construction traffic shall be allowed to use the Waltman Lane/Meridian Road/Main Street intersection until it is also completed.). Construction traffic for the Durnose of infrastructure improvements shall be allowed during the construction related to the Waltman Lane/Meridian Road/Main Street intersection. • Prior to occupancy of any structure located on this site., the Waltman Lane/Meridian Road/Main Street intersection shall be completed_ AND Further, up to 75,000 square feet of gross building area will be allowed prior to the extension of Corporate Drive shall be e�,4ended across the Ten Mile Creek t6 connectii to Waltman Lane AND Waltman Lane shall be fu4ly impfeve I ... . , - - --dewalks (designed to the- et-prepeft3- A Certificate of Zoning compliance anDlication(s) will not be approved for any structure(s) on the site that exceeds the total allowed square footage for the site until Corporate Drive is extended • All buildings on the site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual office and retail elevations submitted with this application ({ems, unless the identified. Develo ment A reement is modified by the developer once actual users are • Except for a potential hotel site at the southwest corner, offices shall be constructed along the west and northwest boundaries of this site as a transitional use to the existing residential uses unless the adiacent uses are changed into non-residential uses). • Restaurant uses ro osed 11lo11 lin, the north bounda of the site(excluding the northwest corner directly..adiacent to existing residences of which restaurant uses are not allowed) are not allowed to have outdoor seating areas located adiacent to Waltman Lane and residences to the north unless the adiacent uses are chap ed into non-residential uses) • All structures along the west and north property boundaries adjacent to existing residences shall be limited in height to two stories and shall have a minimum setback of 25 feet adjacent to the existing.residences unless the ad' agent uses are changed into non-residential uses) with the exception of the ---nosed hotel If e hotel is built at the southwest corner of the site as depicted on the concept plan, a 25- foot setback shall he —pia;r ri r--+i,,. �r_ . 2 stories,_ adiacent to existing residences Structures along the west and northwest property boundaries directly adjacent to residences shall position second story and higher, in the case of a hotel) windows in such a manner as not to have views directly into neighboring residential properties. • No rear loading areas, elive areas trash are or obtrusive lne shall be Permitted adiacent to existing residences on the west and north property rty • A minimum of 15 buildings sheuld shall be required on this site. • Development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan submitted with this application, as determined by the Planning Director, unless the Develo ment A reement is modified by the develo er once actual users are identified. • Prior to issuance of the first occupancy, a 10-foot wide multi -use pathway shall be constructed at the northeast corner of the site as depicted on the conce-t -Ian and as ap-roved by the Parks Department, on the east side of the Ten Mile Drain in alignment with the existing pathway on the north side of Waltman Lane, in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8 and 11-3B-12, and the Master Pathways Plan. • Construct a maximum of 5 access points to Corporate Drive as shown on the concept plan unless the Develo ment A reement is modified byusers are identified. once the developer actual A Preliminary Plat condition of approval was added: ➢ A maximum .,f S �....o..,. ____._ � .. _ depicted on the concept plan • The building elevations that were submitted for the last hearing have been included as Exhibit A.5 in the Staff Report. Written testimony on this application was received from Art Berry. Project: Regency at River Valley (AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004) Location, size of property and existing zoning: The site is located at 2500 N. Eagle Road, approximately %2 mile north of the Fairview/Eagle intersection on the east side of Eagle Road. The property consists of 12.06 acres and is currently zoned RUT in Ada County. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G; East: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residences in Redfeather Estates subdivision, zoned R-4; South: Vacant property (being zoned C-G for Meridian Town Center), zoned RUT (Ada County); West: Single-family residence and vacant property, zoned RUT (Ada County); office uses (on the west side of Eagle Road), zoned L-O; and vacant property, zoned C-G Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use - Regional Applications: • AZ-08-003 - Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts • CUP-08-004 - Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district • VAR-08-001 -Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B which prohibits new access points to state highways; request to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road until such time as E. River Valley Road is constructed • VAR-08-002 - Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi -family dwellings Project Summary: The applicant is proposing 204 multi -family living units within 9 apartment buildings, a clubhouse, swimming pool area, a putting green, several gazebos, an entry water feature, pathways, extensive landscaping, and a playground area. 18% or 1.91 acres of useable open space is provided. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Access to the site is proposed from two access points to/from the future extension of E. River Valley Road, which currently does not exist. A variance for temporary access to Eagle Road through the property proposed to be zoned C-C is also requested; Staff is not supportive of the proposed temporary access to Eagle Road. In fact, staff is recommending denial of both the variance request for access to Eagle Road and the applicant's request to annex the 1.5 acre parcel proposed for C-C zoning. The applicant is proposing to construct 25' and 26' drive aisles within the multi -family development; Staff is requesting that the applicant submit a private street application and that minimum 26-foot wide private streets are provided. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Allys Way on the east boundary of the site in alignment with the existing Allys Way north of the site. ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the Allys Way bridge over the South Slough. An access to Allys Way to the east is not proposed; City Staff is requesting an access to/from Allys Way be provided. Off -Street Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi -family dwellings with 1 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 48 1-bedroom units. Multi -family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site for a total of 408 spaces. There are 7 garage structures depicted on the plan that contain 6 parking spaces each for a total of 42 enclosed spaces; 253 carport parking spaces are also provided that allow for a total of 295 covered spaces; and 113 open stalls are provided for a total of 408 parking stalls provided on the site. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required; the applicant is 65 covered parking spaces short. Staff is not supportive of the requested parking variance. Landscaping: Width of street buffer(s): A 35-foot wide buffer is required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an arterial street; a 20-foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector street, and a 20-foot wide buffer will be required along the future E. River Valley Road, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Canals: The South Slough is a natural waterway and will remain open; the Downey Lateral shall be covered. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the South Slough should be improved and protected with development of this property. The structures depicted on the site plan along the southern boundary encroach approximately 12 feet into Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey Sublateral. Staff spoke with Steve Earl, Mason & Stanfield, regarding this issue and he stated that the lateral was going to be relocated 25 feet to the south. If the lateral is relocated, the structures would no longer be within the easement. At the time of CZC application, the easement should have already been relocated, OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement. The applicant should submit a letter from NMID prior to Commission action on this project documenting that they are amenable to relocating the lateral and easement. Further, Staff is concerned that NMID will not allow trees within their easement, which would create a street buffer with no trees along E. River Valley Road. The applicant should address tonight how landscaping will be installed along River Valley Road, in relation to a relocated Downey Sublateral. Proposed (DRAFT) DA requirements: See staff report, pages 9, 10 &11. History of Previous Actions: The following applications were submitted for this property in 2006 and all were denied by the City Council: • Annexation and Zoning (AZ-06-035) of 12.06 acres to C-C (Community Business District) (1.50 acres) and R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) • Conditional Use Permit (CUP-06-022) for a multi -family development consisting of 204 multi -family residential units • Private Street (PS-06-006) request adjacent to the proposed multi -family units • Variance (VAR-06-014) request to UDC 11-3C-6A to provide less than the required number of covered parking stalls for multi -family dwellings • Variance (VAR-06-015) request to UDC 11-4.3.27133 to provide less than 80 square feet of private, usable open space for each multi -family dwelling unit • Variance (VAR-06-016) request to UDC 11-3h-4132 to construct a vehicular access to a state highway at a location other than a section line road or the half mile mark between sections Elevations: Yes. There are four different building elevations, plus the clubhouse elevation. The structures are all proposed to have brick veneer masonry, stucco, stone veneer, and fiberglass -reinforced asphalt shingles. All of the structures are 2-3 stories in height, have the same architectural design and appearance but are different in size based on how many units they contain. One single -story clubhouse structure is also proposed with the same construction materials as the multi -family structures. Letters of testimony have not been received from any adjacent property owners. Staff has received revised comments from the Fire Department and the applicant regarding the access point to Ally's Way to the east. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending several significant changes to the site plan, parking plan, access plan, and building locations. Staff is also recommending that the C-C zoned area adjacent to Eagle Road not be annexed at this time. For these reasons, and because comments have not yet been received from ACHD and ITD, Staff is requesting that the Commission defer action until a later date to give the applicant time to make revisions to the site plan and landscape plan. Notes: March 3, 2008 AZ 08-003 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING March 6, 2008 APPLICANT Mason & Stanfield ITEM NO. 7 REQUEST Public Hearing - Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT to R-40 (10.56 acres) and C-C (1.15 acres) zones for Regency at River Valley (Revised) - 2500 N. Eagle Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: ITD INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See attached Staff Report No Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments OTHER: See attached Affidavit of Posting / Supplementary Submittal Contacted: U44 11i,,,M, Date: U o : Emailed: k QC -rvk s.Sta Initials: lkJ Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.