Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Clerk Checklist
MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Shaun Wardle William L. M. Nary Charles M. Rountree Keith Bird CITY OF ���I �rl�lcn� 11 IDAHO ti LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208)898-5500• Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: March 11, 2004 Transmittal Date: February 10, 2004 Hearing Date: March 18, 2004 File No.: PP 04-004 Request: Preliminary Plat approval of 16 commercial building lots & 5 common lots on 34.6 acres in proposed I-L, L-O, & C-G zones for proposed McNelis Subdivision By: Falcon Creek, LLC Location of Property or Project: northwest corner of North Ten Mile Road and West Ustick Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) David Moe, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Charlie Rountree, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Shaun Wardle, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department Your Concise Remarks: Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FPIPP only) U.S. West (FP/PPonly) Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Ada County Land Records (FP/PPonly) Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 • Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 • Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 CITY OF MERIDIAN Planning & Zoning Department FILE 660 E. Watertower Ln., Ste. 202, Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 884-5533 Phone / (208) 888-6854 Fax REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT (RE: Meridian Subdivision Ordinance—12-3-1 thru 12-3-6) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of annexation and subdivision: MCNelis Subdivision 2. Address, general location of site: SE'/a of Section 34 TAN., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho — NW Corner of N. Ten Mile Road and W. Ustick Road. 3. Owner(s) of record: Falcon Creek LLC Address: 621 N. Robinson Road Nampa, ID 83687 Telephone: (208) 466-9107 Fax: (208) 466-9107 E-mail: N/A 4. Applicant: Same as Owner Address: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: 5. Engineer/Planner: Kathy Stroschein/Becky McKay Firm: Engineering Solutions, LLP Address: 150E Aikens Street Suite B Eagle ID 83616 Telephone: (208) 938-0980 Fax: (208) 938-0941 E-mail: es-beckym&gwest.net 6. Name and address to receive City billings- Name: Same as Applicant Address Telephone: PRELIMINARY PLAT FEATURES 1. Acres: 34.603 2. Number of building lots: 16 3. Number of other lots: 5 4. Gross density per acre: N/A umtS/acre (Number of dwelling units per acre of total land to be developed) 5. Net density per acre: N/A (Number of dwelling units per acre of land excluding roads) 6. Zoning District(s): Existing: RUT Proposed: I-L, L-O, C-G 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt or pathway? Yes 8. Have recreational easements been provided for? To be provided per approval 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? Yes Explain: Multi -use pathway easements to be provided 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? No Explain For future parks? No Explain 11. What school(s) service the area? N/A Do you propose any agreements for future school sites? No Explain School District has not indicated a school is needed in this area, and this development does not impact school populations.. 12. Are there any other proposed amenities to the City? No Explain 13. Type of building (residential, commercial, industrial, office or combination) commercial, industrialoffice combination. 14. Type of dwelling(s) (single family, duplexes, multiplexes, other): N/A 15. Proposed development features: 2 Rev. 11103103 a. Minimum b,,vaare footage of lot(s): In accordance -rth Ordinance b. Minimum square footage of structure(s): N/A C. Are garages provided for? N/A Square footage: N/A d. Has landscaping been provided for? Yes Describe: Common areas and landscape easements will be landscaped with sod or hydro -seeded, and trees will be provided. e. Who will own and maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? Undecided Irrigation District: Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District f. Are any lots intended for multi -family dwellings? No Type: g. Are there special set back requirements? No Explain: h. Were protective covenants submitted? Yes Date: 1115105 16. Does the proposal land lock other property? No Does it create Enclaves? No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be constructed in accordance with City Ordinance. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, which designates this area as Mixed Use — Wastewater Treatment Plant. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat includes all appropriate easements. 6. Street names do not conflict with City grid system. 7. All items noted on the preliminary plat checklist have been completed. I have read the information contained herein and certify the information is true and correct and that this plat is in compliance with the above statements. 4 on Bl 1r eazer 7. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT FEATURES a. The property is almost completely surrounded by property already annexed into the City of Meridian. b. The proposed project will include uses that are specifically referenced in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. c. The City of Meridian's Wastewater Treatment Plant is north of this property; residential uses are discouraged. Light warehousing, storage facilities, contractor's yards, and similar uses that are not heavy traffic generators are proposed for the industrial zone d. The Nine Mile Creek abuts the property on the westerly boundary, and the Five Mile Creek abuts the northerly boundary. Ten -foot -wide multi -use pedestrian pathways will be allowed for on the applicant's property in accordance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan. e. The L-O uses will provide a buffer to the residential subdivisions south, west and east of this property. This zoning request is in compliance with the existing Meridian Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Mixed Use - Wastewater Treatment Plant. f. Zoning the corner C-G will allow services such as a neighborhood convenience store to be constructed to serve the surrounding area. At present, the nearest convenience store is two miles away. g. Sewer and water service is readily available to the site. The City of Meridian Public Works Department is requesting a sewer easement for pressure sewer across a portion of the site. h. The project will provide a development that will complement the surrounding land uses and provide needed services. i. The project will provide recreational opportunities for the citizens of Meridian with the pathways adjacent to Nine Mile Creek and Five Mile Creek. j. Buffers as called for in the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance will be provided to buffer incompatible uses. k. The attached "Exhibit A" outlines permitted and prohibited uses proposed for insertion into a development agreement. 1. The proposed annexation request is in harmony with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The City's Future Land Use Map designates the property as Mixed Use — Wastewater Treatment Plant. The development will improve the character and quality of the City and enhance the City's identity as a self-sufficient community, providing services necessary to support the area. 21. I, Shari Stiles, certify that I will post the property at least ten (10) days before each public hearing and provide an affidavit of posting. 22. Affidavits of posting will be submitted after physical posting of the property. �s Shari Stiles e 9aess£ v v a YarN.,mYO� 2.1i tiS iSRt,�iS S vg A < e l s x T_ _� C� 8 F_ oRB n Sri R mnE� S ^I�mR 9�= Ems_ g _ iQi1 Cj E �i yL C C i r� m F srRlora o ? m MCNBLIS SUBDIVISION ENGINEERING °' 21 ° B PLANNER / CONTACT DEVELOPER B PRELIMINARY PLAT SOLUTIONS, teo EE uREtis .79 FALCON uC m A I 1 1 u To Y $ LDC N THE SE 1/4 W SEC M, L4 K. R.1 E.. M t50 E uKp15 STREET. SBRE B E. E pyp g}¢16 FiWlf. ID 83816 (IDS v'D� v 12�) ov-wt xRD�esso�x R KWRA O. 61E8) qpg: (pB) IEM9t°) IERONK ID1 M MIY. OW rn.i. (1oB) I— F. M OWNERS OF RECORD FALCON CREEK LLC .21K�--. — xlk ID. BS6Bl — (2.) 4sa-stoT KEC ORDE D - EIGUESz OF ADA COUNTY RECORDER OAVID NAVARRO 5015E. tt)aH0 F DEPUTY .Ztl�! AU 6 AM�IOnESD LARRY K. PETERSON, an unmarried man, FDWA 101083650 husband and wife, Grantor, hGreb conve RD J. and VON ZAI McNELJS, ants to FALCON bruited liability company, whose address is 2 N Robinson Road, Nampa daho CREEK: L_L.C., a for the sum of "rEN DOLLARS, an outer goad and w�Juab(c cRoaderatio 687, Gram,' real proprrty,. to -wit' n, the following described The Legal DCScription of said property is attached hereto as Gxhibit A. SUBJECT TO taxes and assessments for the year 20D 1 and all subsequent Years, together with any and all existing easements, oghu-of-Aray, reservations, restrictions end encurnbrances of record, to any existing tenaru.*-ies, to all zonvig laws and ordinances, and to any state orfacts accurate survey or inspection of the premises would show, an This Conveyance shall include any and all appurtenances, tenements, hereditarnernts, reversions, remainders, easements, rights -of -way and Property herein descrihe& water rights in anywise appertaito the the The Grantor covemwts to the Gfantee that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that the premises are !tree &am all encurnbrances, excepting be hemin set forth, and excepting those of record, and the Grantor will wam3ntt and defend he sme from all lawful claims. SS WREREOF, the Grantor has executed this inscruntent on this _(�_ day Larry K. eterson Edward J. McNelly Von Zae Zeli$:_ STATE OF l Amo ) ss. County ofl"4dft °� ) wARRAU*fY DEED - t On than � day of Qs. , zoo I, before me, the unde4migncd, a notary public in and for said State, personally ep ed LARRY K- .PETERSON, £DWARD.J. McNELI ND VON 7�E McNET..iS known to me to be the individuals that executed the foregoing document and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. INWITNESS WHEREOF, l have hereunto set my hand and affixed rrty ufficiar seal the d:iy and year in this certificate first above written. \��\11�11ttNIUQNI�l4 ��'����y N•-.r9,,o�' Notary Pu lic fo dah t: NOTAq , Residingat: My commission Ex p,res: s�,6 r• -. — ry4- UsLtr--.'0 WARRANTY DEED - 2 EXHIBIT A .A parcel of land located in the Southeast quarto of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 2 and 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West and Sections 34 and 35, Township 4 North, Ranee ] West, Boise Meridian; thence along the South boundary of said Section 34 North 89 degrees 43 '00- West, 934.94 feet; thence North 37 dcgrets 25'41 West, 861.63 Feet; thence North 43 degrees 06'33" Wcst, 45.13 feet thence 153.82 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 290.92 feet, a central angle of 30 degrees 05'54, and a long chord bearing North 58 dcgces 09'30" West, 151.07 feet; thence North 73 degrees 12'27" West, 105.95 feet; thence 122.51 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 100.50 feet, a central angle of 69 degrees 50'36", and a ]ono chord bearing North 38 degrees .17'09" West, 115.06 feet; thtnc:e North 03 degrees 2l'51" West, 140.80 feet; thence North 80 degrees 31'41" East, 287.40 feet: thmee South 86 degrees 5 J ' 15" East, 701.30 feet; thence North 64 degrees 14'16" East, 277.37 feet, thence South 89 degrees 43 TV East, 303.90 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17'33" West, 253.68 feet; thence South 89 degrees 42'25" East, 267.53 feet to a point on the East boundary of said Section 34; thence South 00 degree: 17'35" West, 935.83 feet to the Point of Beginning_ EXCEPT any portion lying within the right of way ofUstick Road or North Tetmwile Road. AFMAVI T OF LEGAL IIV'I" EF ►T STATE OF I DAHO ) s� COUNTY OF ADA ) L Lem BIwer, depose and say: l . "That Fakm Creek, LLC. is the record owner of the property described on the attached, and we grant our permission to: Engineering Solutions, LI-C, 150 E. Aikens Strut, Suite H, Eagle, Idaho 93616 to submit the a000mpanying aPPlication pertaining to OM property, 2. 1 agee to indemnify, defend and bold tie City of Meridian and its employees heunless from any claim or hab'Hty resulting from any dispute as to the Statements contained herein or as to the vwnershiP of the property that is the subject of the application. Dated this day of 2W. Leon1kner SUBSCRIBED AMID SWORN to bafore me the day and year first above written. .�'� F `•� 404b l for Idaho �F : NOTq •. ?�}, My Commission res Expi: o fi ID ADO,,.`'••. IDSOS Document 251 Page I of I ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 410 (Instructions on back of application) jUli 2] 4" �� .98 1. The name of the limited liability company is: Falcon Ere-Ereek. I„ ..%.. - 2. The address of the initial registered office is: 621 No. Robinson Rd., Nampa, Id 8.3687 1W a Po ftx) and the name of the initial registered agent at that address is: Edward J . McNel f s Signature of registered agent: 3. Is management of the limited liability company vested in a manager -or managers? E] Yes ❑ No (axmprwt m..Y) 4. If management is vested in one or more manager(s), list the narne(s) and address(es) of at least one initial manager. If management is vested in the members, list the name(s) and address(es) of at least one initial member. Name: Address: Edward J_ McNelis Sarre as above A. Leon Blaser(Interwest Development, Inc.) Same as above 5. Signat re of atUdaft one f4erson listed jn f#4 above: e6/2:4/1:998 asses M-. 0 Cc 1 CT: 16W Illt 1M. « 10 W.N 6 1111.M! � U.0 U J 0 http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/search.html?S earchFormstep=printdoc&SearchFormSearchFor... 8/5/2003 CD HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. ?,L ,.O 701 S. Allen St., Suite 102 a Meridian, 10 83642 Project No. 0112500 TEN MILE-USTICK BUSINESS PARK 208/322-8992 a Fax 208/378-0329 July 2, 2001 A parcel of land located in the SE114 of Section 34, TAN., RAW., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the comer common to Sections 2 and 3, T.3N., RAW., and Sections 34 and 35, TAN., RAW., B.M.; thence along the South boundary of said Section 34 North 89043'00" West, 934.94 feet; thence North 37025'41" West, 861.63 feet; thence North 43006'33" West, 45.13 feet; thence 152.82 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 290.92 feet, a central angle of 30°05'54", and a long chord bearing North 58009'30" West 151.07 feet; thence North 73"12'27" West, 105.95 feet; thence 122.51 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1.00.50 feet, a central angle of 69°50'36", and a long chord bearing North 38°17'09" West, 115.06 feet; thence North 03"2T51" West, 140.80 feet; thence North 8003T41" East, 287.40 feet; thence South 86"51'15" East, 701.30 feet; thence North 64014'16" East, 277.37 feet; )_1Projects\Ten Milt-UStick Bus. Paris (01-12'-00)1Documenu\DTP-TenNU-,BussPar'c.doc Page 1 of 2 thence South 89"43'09" East, 303.80 feet; thence South 00017'35" West, 253.68 feet; thence South 89"42'25" East, 267.53 feet to a point on the East boundary of said Section 34; thence South 00017'35" West, 935.83 feet to the Point of Beginning: Containing 34.60 acres, more or less. Subject to right-of-way for Ten Mile and Ustick Roads. Prepared By: Hubble Engineering, Inc. D. Terry Peugh; P.L.S. -TAProjec Teri Mile-Uszick Bus. Park(01-I25-00)`Doc=cnts\DTP_TeruvdHoBussPark doc Pane 2 of 2 150 East Aikens Street, Suite B Eagle, ID 83616 Phone: (208) 938-0980 Fax: (208) 938-0941 January 27, 2004 Ms. Sonya Allen Meridian Planning & Zoning 660 E. Watertower, Suite 201 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: McNelis Subdivision — Statement Regarding Variances Dear Ms. Allen: In regard to the above -referenced subdivision, the applicant is not requesting any variances at this time. If you have further questions concerning the application for Falcon Creek LLC, please feel free to call me at 938-0980. Sincerely, Engineering Solutions, LLP Shari Stiles Office Manager/Planner As Ten Mile / Ustiok Business Park Ground Water Monitoring Stations Measurements taken under the supervision of Steve Sedlacek, P.E. Water Level Measurements Casing 1/18/01 1126101 316101 3127101 to Casing I Ground to GW Casing to Casing to Casing to Depth depth Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to Well # (in) (in) GW depth (in) GW depth (in) GW depth (in) GW PZ-1 21.5 74.125 52.625 75.375 53.875 74.25 52.75 78 56.5 PZ-2 21.75 68.125 46.375 70.25 48.5 69.875 48.125 75.375 53.625 PZ-3 19 70.5 51.5 70 51 71.375 52.375 72.75 53.75 PZ-4 18.5 64.875 46.375 67.375 48.875 66.375 47.875 70.5 52 PZ-5 17.625 74.625 57 76 58.375 75.25 57.625 77.875 60.25 Ten Mile / Ustick Business Park Ground Water Monitoring Stations Measurements taken under the supervision of Steve Sedlacek, P.E. Water Level Measurements 1118101 Casing to Ground Depth Well # (in) PZ-1 21.5 PZ-2 21.75 PZ-3 19 PZ-4 18.5 PZ-5 17.625 Casing 1126101 1 316101 to GW Casing to depth Depth to GW Depth to (in) GW depth (in) GW_ 74.125 52.625 75.375 53.875 68.125 46.375 70.25 48.5 70.5 51.5 70 51 64.875 46.375 67.375 48.875 74.625 57 76 58.375 3127101 Casing to Casing to GW Depth to GW Depth to depth (in) GW depth (in) GW 74.25 52.75 78 56.5 69.875 48.125 75.375 53.625 71.375 52.375 72.75 53.75 66.375 47.875 70.5 52 75.25 57.625 77.875 6Q.25 Traffic Impact Study Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Boise, Idaho Prepared for. Falcon Creek 621 Robinson Road Nampa, Idaho 83687 Prepared by. - Earth Tech 3071 E. Franklin, #301 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208) 855-2000 June 8, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMIl17ARY....... 1 INTRODUCTION........................ .. ............. ......................................................................... PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT.................................................................................................... 2 STUDY AREA CONDITIONS ................................... 2 StudyArea...........................................................•-......................_.....•......._........................................ 2 Land Use . .................... 2 ................ EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................... 5 Traffic Volumes ...................... 5 RoadSystem.......................................................................................................................................... 5 STUDYPERIOD......................................................................................................................................... 5 PROJECTEDTRAFFIC.............................................................................................................................. 8 SiteTraffic.......................................................................................................................... 8 .Trip Generation ............................. 8 Trip Distribution ..................... OffSite Traffic .............................................................................. ....................................................... 12 BackgroundTraffic.............................................................................................................................. 12 TRAFFICANALYSIS................................................................................................................................. 18 Capacity Analysis and Level-of-Service.................................................................................................. 20 Mitigation....................................................................•.............................................................................. 20 Traffic impact Study for Ten Milel Jstick Business Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ten Mile / Ustick Business Park is a proposed Business Park development in Meridian, Idaho, consisting of 4 Commercial Service Businesses. It is located in the Northwest corner of Ten Mile Rd./ Ustick Rd. intersection in Meridian, Idaho. The preliminary site plan is shown in Figure 2. The area of influence will be Ten Mile Rd./Ustick Rd. and the four adjacent intersections. The primary area of study will be the intersections of Ten Mile Rd./Ustick Rd., Ten Mile Rd./Cherry Rd., Ten Mile Rd./McMillan Rd., Ustick Rd./B1ackCat Rd., Ustick Rd./Linder Rd. The following are the principal findings and recommendations of the study: • The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 3006 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) is 379 vehicles per hour (vph). • The proposed development will access the site from Ten Mile Road. • Ten Mile Rd. will have sufficient capacity to absorb the traffic generated by the proposed development. • The Ten Mile/Ustick Business development entrance will function at LOS B. • Background traffic will include traffic from the Bridgewater Subdivision in Meridian. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and Cherry Ln. will operate at a constant LOS C with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and McMillan Rd. will operate at a constant LOS C with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. • The intersection of B1ackCat Rd. and Ustick Rd. will operate at a constant LOS A with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. • The intersection of Linder Rd. and Ustick Rd. will decline to a LOS F with the Background traffic alone. Adding the development's traffic will degrade the intersection's operation further into a LOS F. Adding left turn bays on all approaches of the intersection will improve the operation, but it will stay at LOS F. A signal would be required to improve the LOS. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and Ustick Rd. will operate at a LOS D under background traffic conditions, and LOS F with the total 2010 traffic. Constructing left turn. bays on all four approaches at the intersections of Ten Mile RdJUstick Rd. and Linder Rd./Ustick Rd. will increase the operations to a LOS D. Results of the intersection capacity analysis: Level of Service (LOS Existing Background Modification Total Modification Intersection 2001 2010 2010 2010 2010 Ten Mile/Ustick B D F D Ten Mile/Cherry Ln C C C Ten Mile/McMillan B C C Ustick/Linder C F Ustick/BlackCat A A All Business Park Entrances E F F A B 06106101 \vim A 2i(LV WfFRN4lpNAL LTD COMhWY L:IWOXK145600 FalconCreeklDo slFalcon TIS.doc Page - I - Traffic Impact Study for Ten MilelUstick Business Park INTRODUCTION Earth Tech has been retained to prepare a traffic impact study for the proposed Ten Mile;Ustick Business Park located in Meridian, Idaho. The project consists of 4 Commercial Service Businesses. Figure 1 shows the location of the project. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traffic impacts resulting from the project, and make recommendations for mitigation to the impacts. In particular, the scope of the study includes the following: • Trip generation of the proposed development; • Trip distribution and traffic assignment of the site generated traffic; • Roadway capacity impacts at the intersections mentioned above; • Determine the anticipated traffic volumes of on site roadways. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Ten Mile / Ustick Business Park is a proposed Business Park development in Meridian, Idaho, consisting of 4 Commercial Service Businesses. The site consists of: Sanitary Services (10 Acres +/-), School Bus Facility (17 Acres +/-), Western Recycling (1.5 Acres +/-), and Two Commercial Services (5.0 Acres +/-). The site is located in the Northwest corner of Ten Mile Rd./ Ustick Rd. intersection in Meridian, Idaho. The preliminary site plan is shown in Figure 2. STUDY AREA CONDITIONS Study Area The area of influence will be Ten Mile Rd./Ustick Rd. and the four adjacent intersections. The primary area of study will be the intersections of Ten Mile Rd./Ustick Rd., Ten Mile Rd./Cherry Rd., Ten Mile Rd./McMillan Rd., Ustick Rd./BlackCat Rd., Ustick Rd./Linder Rd. Land Use The site is currently vacant and zoned as Rural-UrbanTransition Zone. 06106101 E H t H`) T E C H w hrCV r+rca�wreoa Lm cae«+wr Page - 2 L�IWORK145600 FalconCreeklDoalFalcon T7Sdoc o 9 'M 1 M 9 'pa QPLC -T �. 8 Sb `x To RS O SANITARY SERVICES 10 Ac. +/- I Ipco WESTERN SCHOOL BUS FACA M 17 Ac +/- RECYCLING 1.5 Ac +/- SERVICE -6 COMMERCIAL w 2.5 Ac +/- Ill. v 2 LOTS 1111LJ 9a C Ln Traffic Impact .Study for Ten Mil&F)stick Business Park EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes PM peak traffic volumes were obtained from Meridian North End Traffic Study preformed by Washington Group; except for the PM peak traffic count at the intersection of Ten Mile Rd./Cherry Lane, which was conducted by Earth Tech. The turning movements for the intersection were counted for this project in May of 2001. Existing 2001 turning movements for the five intersections are summarized in Figures 3A — 3E. Road System The road system in the site vicinity is described below: • Ten Mile Road is a two-lane rural highway classified as a minor arterial, with a speed limit of 50 mph. The speed limit is 50 mph to the north of Ustick Road, and 35 mph to the south of Ustick Road. • Ustick Road is a two-lane section and classified as a minor arterial. The speed limit is 45 mph west of Ten Mile Road, and 35 mph to the east. _ • The intersection Ten Mile Road and McMillan Road is a two-way stop controlled along McMillan Rd. • The intersection of Ten Mile Road and Ustick Rd. is four-way stop controlled with two-lane on each approach, except the south leg which has three -lanes. • The intersection of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane is signalized controlled with five -lane approaches and a speed limit of 35 mph. • The intersection of Ustick Road and Linder Road is four-way stop controlled, with two-lane on each approach. • The intersection of Ustick Road and BlackCat Rd. is four-way stop controlled with two-lane approaches on all leg. • Linder Road is a two-lane section and classified as a minor arterial, with a speed limit varying from 35 mph to 50mph. • McMillan Road is a two-lane section and is classed as a minor arterial to the east of Ten Mile Road and classified as a collector to the west. The speed limit varies from 45 mph to 50 mph. • BlackCat Road is a two-lane section and classified as a minor arterial, with a speed limit of 50 mph. STUDY PERIOD The analysis year for this study will be (2010) year, with and without the project. Typically the p.m. peak hour within Ada County occurs between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. 06106101 E A R T H L: I WORK145600 FalcaaCreeklDocslFalcoa—TIS_doc ntucvx eaVa�awccm." Page - S Figure 3A - Existing Peak Hour Counts Ten Mile Road and Ustick Road Ustick Rd. 275 525 250 Ten Mile Road e--- 150 25� 75 90 25 C 225-4 ----------------- ------ 2 225 75 25 25 25 i 1 25 200 ------ ------------- 1--------- -- --- ► 1 � 1 25 ; 1 1 1 v 25 75 50 25 25 50 150 100 � f 250 Figure 36 - Existing Peak Hour Counts Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane Cherry Ln. 456 886 430 Ten Mile Road 868 344 �524� 42�2 2 —� 0 85� 310 29 i 1 i 42 I 1 1 333-- ----- --------- 1 1 1 85 1 1 309 i--------� 1 1 36 1 1 I' 1 1 1 1 ♦ 36 232 146 414 923 1 - ---------- 1--------------► 81 310 118 J 509 Trafjzc Impact Study for fen Mile/Ustick Business Park Ustick Rd. 25 ] 225 300 50 600 50 200 300 50 1 1 Cherry Ln. 129 333 608 �] 146 1105 70 31191 497 118 0"6101 E A R T N`, T F C M L:IWORR145600Fa1cOnCreeklDocrIFalcon—M..doc At4100MMs rn*aODCo .r Page-6 Figure 3C - Existing Peak Hour Counts Ten Mile Road and McMillan Road Ten Mile Road McMillan Rd. 78 115 37 76 4� 70 —,2 c 2 70 36 108 Figure 3D - Existing Peak Hour Counts Ustick Road and Linder Road J Ustick Rd. 50 300 200 '-- 50-_.. 600 50 C 300 200 C Sn r— Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/UstickBusiness Park 139 63 2 59 2 McMillan Rd. 2 ------------ 70 108 4 59 8 Y � 71 Under Road 326 76 250 50 250 Sp 50r 150 Sp i i 50 250 20 50 150 50 320 250 570 06/ "1 E A! T H`/ T ! C H r-IWORIn145600FalconCreeElpat,jFalcon_Tns..dot Aty=Wl MVAT/O LMC-A r 36 2 33 43 8 Ustick Rd. 50 200 270 20 50 200 300 50 151 570 Page - 7 Figure 3E - Existing Peak Hour Counts Ustick Road and BlackCat Road Ustick Rd. 118 247 129 BlackCat Road 61 4 50 7 n n r- 1 50 22 73 PROJECTED TRAFFIC Site. Traffic Trip Generation 104 43 7 32 i 12 32 30 74 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Usfick Rd. 128 158 286 Site traffic generation is normally estimated by procedures recommended in the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual (6m Ed), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), in the absence of site -specific data. Trip rates estimated in the manual are based on actual driveway traffic measurements performed on different land uses nationwide, particularly in metropolitan areas. The site trip generation is obtained by applying the trip rates (from the Trip Generation Manual) of the "General Light Industry" for this project development. Table 1 represents the summary of the site trip generation for the two Commercial Services. Actual counted traffic trips from a similar school bus facility will be implemented for this school bus facility. For Western recycling, actual traffic counts from a similar site will implemented. The Sanitary Service will not be included in our PM Peak Hour trip generation, because the services do not contribute to PM Peak Hour traffic. This service operates during non -peak traffic hours. Trip generation results indicate that the site is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 3006 vehicles per day (vpd) and a p.m. peak hour traffic (PHT) of 379 vehicles per hour (vph). During the p.m. peak hour, 174 will enter the site and 205 will exit the site. 06106101 E R R T R @ 7 e c H L-IWOW45600Fa1cOnCreek1DoctlFa1con 77Sdoc AtgCo rameTXW� LM,Co�W Page-8 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Table 1 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park, Meridian ID, General Light Development 5.0 Acres Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment Factor Driveway Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 94.85 0.00 1.00 474 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 5.95 0.00 1.00 30 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 21.09 0.00 1.00 105 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 27.04 0.00 1.00 135 Saturday 2-Way Volume 45.22 0.00 1.00 226 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS Sanitary Service Assuming 20 truck facility, this facility will generate an ADT of 150 trips. School Buses Facility From traffic counts, this facility will generate an ADT of 1110 trips and 221 peak hour trips. Western Recycling From traffic counts, this facility will generate an ADT of 256 trips and 23 peak hour trips. Trip Distribution Once the generated trips are estimated, they must be distributed to geographic origins or destinations and assigned to the transportation system. software and a model of the Ada CouThe distribution of this traffic is based on the Tranplan planning The transportation system. The model indicates that 50% of the traffic will travel south and 10% north using Ten Mile, 30% will travel east and 10% west using Ustick Rd.- The distribution of site traffic, based on the model results, is shown in Figure 4A — 4D. 06106101 E A R T R vG1 r e c M L— TlSdoc •IWORA145600FalconCreek0ccrlFalcon at4�Q' F0 TOAaCLD'C"fA4"• Page - 9 0 Figure 4A - 2010 PM Peak Hr Site Traffic Ten Mile/Ustick Development and Ten Mile Road (North Entrance) Ten Mile Road 29 J Ten Mile/Ustick Dev. 11 38 p-- 27 f--- 168 C 8 1C 130 1 0 C 112 C- 11 11 0 0 <=� H C 112 0 0 112 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park 18 NORM 18 0 0 I ; ' 0 ----------� 0 0 —----� 0 27 0 0 27 1 139 Figure 413 - 2010 PM Peak Hr Site Traffic Ten Mile/Ustick Development and Ten Mile Road (South Entrance) Ten Mile Road 8 4 4 l 4 0 0 4 0 0 TenMlle/Ustick Dev. 4 15 67 4 52 f 0 C 48 1— f 1 ; 48 0 0 11 0 48 11 Y 59 0 0 1 -�a NOKM 0 0 0 ► o 01 o 0 0610"1 E A a T M `) T e c. 11WOM45600 Fa[coaGerHDccrlFa&on TJMdoc "tqt lalnv.mA Lm. ct� page -10 Traffic Impact Study for Ten 1llilelUstick Business Park Figure 4C - 2010 PM Peak Hr Site Traffic Ten Mile/Ustick Development and Ustick Road (East Entrance) TenMile/Ustick Dev. 18 7 11 A �1 NOM 4 0 3 2 0 9 Ustick Rd. ; 4 1 ' 9 y / 9 0L-------- ---.--- �.� %� — - ----- — 0 54 y� i - - - 0 50 0 ------ ------------- '---- --------- 0 0 1 48' 0 I 48 0 0 0 0 0 l 48 0 Y Figure 4C - 2010 PM Peak Hr Site Traffic 48 Ten Mile/Ustick Development and Ustick Road (West Entrance) TenMile/Ustick Dev. 126 33 93 A ' � NOkftH 18 0 15 14 0 79 Ustick Rd. 18 *-1; 79 18 p f-------------- ----- A --►----------� 0 79 i 32 14 0 14 •------- --- --------- —'- i--- —--------- � 0 0 0 ' ' 0 PT ♦ 'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"601 E A A T! I- IWOBX145600 Falcon A � ��aw[ cro. cnxsw.M• GeaElDoctlFalcon T7Sdac Page -11 79 9 Traffic Impact Study for Ten MileVstick Business Park Off Site Traffic The Ada County Highway District has provided information on one additional development in the area. This development is the Bridgewater Subdivision. Preliminary information from the traffic impact study prepared by Washington Group International was reviewed to determine if the proposed land use of the development was in accordance with land uses in the COMPASS model. It was determined that the land use was more intensive than anticipated in the COMPASS model, so the Bridgewater traffic will be added to the expanded traffic. No other developments have been approved by the City of Meridian. Background Traffic Background traffic for the year 2010 on existing roadways was obtained by projecting the existing counted intersection traffic at an assumed growth factor. The growth rate of 2%o/yr. is based on the Meridian North End Traffic Study performed by Washington Group. Off site development traffic is also included in the background traffic. Background traffic distribution without the site for year 2010 is shown in Figures SA — 5E. Total Traffic The site traffic was added to the background traffic to obtain the total traffic for the year 2010. Total traffic distribution at build out of the site for year 2010 is shown in Figures 6A — 61. 06106/01. E A A T N=) T E c L:IWOW45600FatconCreekLD0cSIFatc0n TlSdoc Atg=� LM.Cam' Page -12 Trafflc Impact Study for Ten MileMstick Business Park Figure SA - 2010 Background Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Ustick Rd. Ten Mile 420 ^ A 1 NOM 80 120 60 50 70 40 i Ustick Ustick 80 40 435 320 - ------------ \ l. ' 320 430 35-4 -------- -- - _ — — — — 70 805 �'<� 845 So— %�\ ---- ------ 60 370 285 ---- --------- ---'------------- 285 415 i 35 ' TO - ; I 35 120 70 35 70 70 l J 225 175 Y 400 Figure 5B - 2010 Background Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Cherry Ln. Ten Mile 1039 ^ 412 627�u(\— 50 278 84 102 371 154 Cherry 50 Cherry \ 154 545 398--------------- \ i --------r---------- 398 727 __•----.75 1060 1322 102 84 515 370 _-- A---------'--------------- ► 370 595 1 43 — 141 06/U6/01 L•IWORKW5600 FalconCreek DocslFatcon Mdoc i I 43 278 175 97 371 141 496 Y--- ` 609 1105 E R R T M `) T[ C N Atq�Ua. Co n Page -13 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Figure 5C - 2010 Background Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and McMillan Rd. Ten Mile 425 225 200 4 r--A--� mom 25 155 45 30 120 50 McMillan McMillan 25 50 175 135 f---------------- -------� I Z---7--------- 135 255 15 f-------- --- — n 70 ---- 280 `�� c x.� 425 3045 — . 105 65 ' ------ - — a------------'--------------� 1 65 170 , 10 , 60 i 1 10 155 70 15 120 60 235 195 Y 430 Figure 5D - 2010 Background Traffic Ustick Rd. and Linder Rd. Linder 950 515 435 70 360 85 135 230 70 Ustick + ; 70 1 Ustick \ 70 425 285 - --------------- 1 ' - -------i--T---------} 285 390 \ / , _ 35 915 �� x:\ 830 135 85 490 285 I - ;-----------' 285 440 70 7(1 0"6/01 L.I R'OMWS600 Fa1conC ewk DorsIFaI T7S doe i 70 360 35 70 230 70 `65 370 835 E A R T R` J T a C M Page -14 Figure 5E - 2010 Background Traffic Ustick Rd. and BlackCat Rd. J Ustick 5 142 122 ,4-- 298f f 15 -4--- 9 C 156 145 C 2 (— Figure 6A - 2010 Total Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Ustick Rd. Traffic Impact Study for Ten MilelEstick Business Park BlackCat 127 74 $3 NOM 5 60 9 9 39 5 i i v v 2 60 27 89 Ten Mile r-- 415 r A � 55 220 -140 Ustick 55 495 350 ! ---- --- 885 ' •� �•\ 50 -- _{— 390 290 ' ----- / 50 � I v 50 220 70 340 06/06/01 LAWORXW5600 FalcanCr-kIDaalFakon I7Sdac � � L 15 39 36 Y 90 Ustick 5 ] 122 154 27 344 • 9 145 190 36 615 -^ 200 lint MORN 50 95 55 I i I i Ustick ' 55 i ----I- 350 475 70 140 __��---'.--------------i 290 500 70 90 95 70 255 E A A T 9 `1 T t C N A UfCaMsm, 7XWy, aC caww 975 Page - IS Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Figure 68 - 2010 Total Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Cherry Ln. Ten Mile 1229 523 7p6 � A � r--� NORiN 71 334 118 115 411 180 Cherry ; 71 i Cherry { 180 � I 566 398 f-------------- ------ -�---a--------- 398 753 ' \ i , 97 4----- - - - -i.� �.%� ------- 175 1382 1094 115 528 370 -----!-]--------- '-------------- 370 629 , i 43 (� 141 I , 43 334 175 L l 552 1201 Figure 6C - 2010 Total Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and McMillan Rd. McMillan 25 182 135 22 290 30 108 65 13 Ten Mile U rr 97 411 141 649 435 230 205 ' A NOM 25 160 45 30 125 50 i , i I , 13 160 75 248 , 22 125 70 217 McMillan u 135 260 i 45 65 180 70 440 06106101 E A R T N`, ! v T Q N L.IWORK14560oFa[conCreekU)OcxxIFalwn I7Sdoc A ""°w1�D"1L1° r Page -16 Trafflc Impact Study for Ten Mile/UstickBusiness Park Figure 6D - 2010 Total Traffic Ustick Rd. and Linder Rd. Linder 950 515 435 r---11 -N2N 70 360 85 135 230 70 Ustidc ' f Ustidc 70 ' 70 \ 472 330 - -------------- V------I ---j-----------} 330 435 W 72 f-------- 1027 135 — — �� �._ _.- .--i 555 345 ----- --�---- ----------♦ 75 ; • ; I 75 360 35 72 230 70 470 372 Y 842 Figure 6E - 2010 Total Traffic Ustick Rd. and BlackCat Rd. Ustick 5 160 140 4" 15 f--- 330 J 170 � 9 C 159 C 2 C BlackCat 127 74 5 60 9 9 39 5 7 � I 2 60 31 93 15 39 38 111-- —r 92 35 85 345 500 70 4 NOM Ustick 7 5 140 176 31 ► 91 206 38 LCA 382 06/0&VI E 6 R T M "�. / T E e M LAWOM45600 FalconCrpekl pap.lF�� � doc a �M�I "a�LM Ca r Page - 17 Traffic Impact Study for Ten MildUstick Business park Figure 6F - 2010 Total Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park (North Entrance) Ten Mile 253 145 1 8 NOM 11 134 0 18 90 0 Entrance 11 1 0 � 1 ; 38 0 t---------------v----------{---- -----� 0 0 •\ 1 i 27 f------• % —�� — — 0 168 _._. 130 0------- --�------------------------� 0 0 112 I i 112 134 0 246 363 0� 27 90 o � Y J 117 J Figure 6G - 2010 Total Traffic Ten Mile Rd. and Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park (South Entrance) Ten Mile 255 J Entrance 4 15 t 1 f-•- 6T 4 C 52 0 C 48 C 134 A � 1 4 130 0 C \ i I i 48 130 0 178 121 4 117 0 G i 11 117 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 06V6101 E A A T A` J T E c M LAWOW45600 FatcoaGCekLD=IFalcon 2mdac wtycnMcw�v„o,,c�' cn�uvr Page -18 Figure 6H - 2010 Total Traffic Ustick Rd. and Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park (East Entrance) Entrance 13 I- 4 � A 1 4 0 0 Ustick C 4 \\ 416 412 i4---------------------- 624 0 _---�— i 208 208 -------- 0<1 ♦ v 0 0 0 � J Y 0 0 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Milelbstick Business Park 9 �1 NOPM 0 0 9 J 9 I I--------" 412 421 ---- 0 — ----------� 0 .__________ __________-� 2000 208 0 0 0 0 - \ J Y 0 — Figure 61 - 2010 Total Traffic Ustick Rd. and Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park (West Entrance) Entrance 131 I, -- 36 � A 1 18 0 18 Ustick 18 351 333 4----- ---- ------ 2 0 f-- -- — ' 557 16 206 190 0 ' � 1 0 0 0 11-- Y l 0 0 95 �1 NOM 16 0 79 1 � 79 I , -------�_« 333 412 --- 0 '�_�-- ---� 18 190 208 0 0 0 0 0 629 620 06106101 E A l t x` J T c c N L•IWOR.CMOOFalconCreeklDoerlF•alcon 77S.doe 4Af �77 JL1°C°A~Y Page -19 Traffic Impact Study for Ten MileVstick Business Park TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity Analysis and Level -of -Service Capacity analysis was performed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS 4.1), based on the 1998 edition Highway Capacity Manual. The ACHD's Development Policy manual stipulates that the latest capacity manual based software be used for purposes of capacity analysis. The intersection was analyzed for existing 2001 traffic, 2010 background traffic and for total 2010 traffic conditions. Copies of the analysis reports are included in the appendix of this report. The capacity analysis assumed the existing lane configurations at the analyzed intersection would stay the same. Mitigation The intersection of Ten Mile Road and Ustick Road will operate at LOS D under background traffic conditions. With the addition of site traffic, the intersection will operate at LOS F. To mitigate the impact from the site traffic, the intersection should be widened to allow the installation of left turn bays on all approaches. If this is done, the intersection will operate at LOS D. The intersection of Ustick Road and Linder Road will operate at LOS F under background conditions. The addition of site traffic will cause further deterioration of the intersection. If the intersection is widened to allow construction of left turn bays on all approaches, the operation will improve, but will still operate at LOS F. A traffic signal will be required to improve operation beyond LOS F. The primary cause of the need for a traffic signal is the background traffic. Results of the intersection capacity analysis: Level of Service (LOS) Existing Background Modification Total Modification Intersection 2001 2010 2010 2010 2010 Ten Mile/Ustick B D F D Ten Mile/Cherry Ln C C C Ten Mile/McMillan B C C Ustick/Linder C F E F F Ustick/BlackCat A A A All Business Park Entrances B The minimum level of service considered acceptable by ACHD is LOS E for intersections of two main arterial roadways, and LOS D for all other signalized intersections. 06106101 E A R T R@ T e c N LAWORK145600FalC0aC,.,,kjDOa1Fa1COA I7Sdoc `tWo�rErtNana.Acun,cw�M Page - 20 Traffic Impact Study for Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park CONCLUSIONS This study identifies transportation impacts associated with the Falcon Creek Development in Meridian, Idaho. The following are the principal findings and recommendations of the study_ • The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 3006 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) is 379 vehicles per hour (vph). • The proposed development will access the site from Ten Mile Road. • Ten Mile Rd. will have sufficient capacity to absorb the traffic generated by the proposed development. • The Ten Mile/Ustick Business development entrance will function at LOS B. • Background traffic will include traffic from the Bridgewater Subdivision in Meridian. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and Cherry Ln. will operate at a constant LOS C with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and McMillan Rd. will operate at a constant LOS C with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. • The intersection of BlackCat Rd. and Ustick Rd. will operate at a constant LOS A with existing traffic through the 2010 analysis. — • The intersection of Linder Rd. and Ustick Rd. will decline to a LOS F with the Background traffic alone. Adding the development's traffic will degrade the intersection's operation further into a LOS F. Adding left turn bays on all approaches of the intersection will improve the operation, but it will stay at LOS F. A signal would be required to improve the LOS. • The intersection of Ten Mile Rd. and Ustick Rd. will operate at a LOS D under background traffic conditions, and LOS F with the total 2010 traffic. Constructing left turn bays on all four approaches at the intersections of Ten Mile Rd./Ustick Rd. and Linder Rd./Ustick Rd. will increase the operations to a LOS D. 06106101 E A A T M `' T! a tt LAWORK145600 FalconCreeklDocrlFa16n rZ.doc Atq � ����///"`/ Lra CO"'" Page -11 -- Traffic Impact Study for Ten lilelUstick Business Park REFERENCES "Trip Generation 6th Edition," by Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., 1997. "Highway Capacity Manual, SR 209," Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1994 update. "Development Policy Manual," Ada County Highway District, July 1994. "Meridian North End Traffic Study," Washington Group, March 2001. 06106Vi E A R T R`) T a C N L IIVORA145600FalconCreeklDocsWaloon =.doc At4COWraMe a.w LIUCo, � Page -11 Traffic Impact Study for Ten MileVstick Business Park APPENDIX 0"6101 , .... .. . L•IWORM45600FWConCreeklOocrlFalcori_y.doc c cr m c m H Figure 1: Site Development Plan Neighborhood Retail Center McMillan Road Bridgetower Subdivision Analysis Page 6 u �r Table 2 Existing Traffic Operations Intersection -. Traffic Control Level=of Service Ustick Road / Linder Road Four -Way STOP C McMillan Road / Linder Road Four -Way STOP _ g Ustick Road / Ten Mile Road Four -Way STOP g McMillan Road / Ten Mile Road Two -Way STOP g Turning movement counts were obtained from Ada County Highway District staff and supplemented by Washington Infrastructure Services. The depicted counts were rounded to the nearest 25 vehicles per hour because the hourly counts were found to vary and were inconsistent between successive intersections. Proposed Project: The proposed project includes 744 residential building lots, 61 senior housing lots and approximately 32 acres (21 lots) for planned office development. A separate 15.68-acre neighborhood shopping center is located north of the main project site, at the northeast corner of the intersection of McMillan Road and Ten Mile Road. Table 3 illustrates the trip generation figures for this project. Figure 3 shows the site development plan with site -generated traffic volumes. Table 3 Land C1se�, _- Number of Tnp Gene -Da�fynp atiora Surrhary Peak`H©riF 1 # �"` Niherflf= :.: of_Peak. Category; ` flniis }lafe t� Residential — Single Famil 744 9.57 1.01 7,120 751 Residential — Senior Housing 61 2.8472 0.27 174 16 General Office 349,000 11.01 1 49 3,842 520 Neighborhood 5ho in Center 500 1.02 0.26 510 130 Elementary School 165,000 34.0832 3.1396 5,624 518 'roject Totat 17,270 1,936 Note 1: Residential units for single family and senior housing. Square -feet for office and commercial land uses. Number of students for the elementary school. Note 2: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6 h Edition. Bridgetower Subdivision Analysis Page 7 Figure 2: Existing Peak Hour Volumes McMillan Road 25 100 25 J1L 25 2s 25 so 25-1 �--- 25 1 I r 25 25 25 Ustick Road J I L L 25 - 2S zoo — — =5 25 --1 r so 1 r 25 25 So 25 300 50 JIL 25 --J 25 25— so 25 F25 175 J I L �so 200 so 50 �Ir So 150 so Existing Plus Project Conditions - Completion of the Residential and Office Components: The traffic volumes at the four arterial intersections after completion of the residential and office units are shown in Figure 4. These volumes were developed by summing the existing traffic volumes with the traffic volumes generated from the site. The existing traffic volumes were increased by three percent per year to account for growth in the background traffic volumes. Build out of the residential and office portions of the project was assumed to occur within five years. Traffic operational analysis was conducted using these volumes at the four intersections and the results are shown in Table 4. The analysis indicates that the two intersections on McMillan Road operate at LOS of "C", which is acceptable but the intersections of Ustick Road/Linder Road and Ustick Road/Ten Mile Road operate at LOS "F", which is unacceptable. Bridgetower Subdivision Analysis Page 8 Table 4 EzisttngPtus Prolect:TcafficO:pecation. � - Build out of the -Residential and. Ofiice-Components - - intersection = TraffcControf -_ LeuetcfService> Ustick Road / Linder Road Four -Way STOP F an Road / Linder Road Four -Way STOP C EUstic,ikRoad / Ten Mile Road Four -Way STOP E an Road / Ten Mile Road Two -Way STOP C Figure 4: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour With Residential and Office Traffic Volumes 30 160 30 / JIL 30 J l_ 30 30 — — 6o 40 f 40 �Ir SO 50 so 50 160 120 JIL/ 70 _.I L_ eo 2% — — 320 75 �Ir 30 70 75 `35 410 60 J I L 35 J L_ 3o 40 — — 6i 35 r 35 llF 40 250 75 90 360 75 �J I L 35J Leo 2% — — 295 75 --, t--- 60 �Ir 75 23o 60 BridgetowerSubdivision Analysis Page 10 Figure 6: Existing Plus Project Peak Hour With Neighborhood Shopping Center Traffic Volumes McMillan Road 50 2M 70 J I L 2; 55— a5 —1 r— 65 v F- �ir 60 100 100 `55 470 70 . JIL 60 35 m 65 — — 105 a 60 r 40 J CIF 55 290 90 Ustick Road tO 70 190 140 100 d20100 J I L \/ J I L 20 90 ._Igo � i `110 —J l _ go Id Sao — — 370 y U S Sao — — Sao 35 85 I) 85 —� 70 l .' —I f sir F 35 110 Bs 85 70 SJ Lane Widening on the Arterial Roadway System - Completion of the Residential and Office Components: Washing on Infrastructure staff has developed a nomograph from various local and national sources that can be used to determine the need for a left -turn lane on higher speed arterial roadways. A copy of this nomograph is included in Appendix A. Using this procedure, a study was conducted to determine the need for a center left -turn lane at the intersections of the site's access points with the Ustick Road, Ten Mile Road, and Linder Road. A summary of the analysis is shown in Table 7. The analysis indicates that a center left -turn lane is required at each of the site's three access points on major roadway. Bridgetower Subdivision Analysis Page 13 HCS2000: Unsigr sed Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: TenMile/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2001 Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. .North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R 125' L T R L T R L T R Volume 50 75 25 25 25 25 200 25 50 225 25 % Thrus Left Lane _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LT R LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 276 332 54 27 165 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 2 1 opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry group 2 2 5 4a Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 276 Left -Turn 27 Right -Turn 27 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.1 Prop. Heavy VehicleO.0 Geometry Group 2 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed -0.0 Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 332 54 27 165 55 27 0 55 27 0 27 27 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 5 4a 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.0 0.1 -0.6 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 276 332 54 27 165 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.25 0.30 0.05 0.02 0.15 hd, final value 5.07 5.02 6.45 5.74 5.70 x, final value 0.39 0.46 0.10 0.04 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time 3.1 3.0 4.2 3.4 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 276 332 54 27 Service Time 3.1 3.0 4.2 3.4 Utilization, x 0.39 0.46 0.10 0.04 Dep. headway, hd 5.07 5.02 6.45 5.74 Capacity 526 582 304 277 Delay 11.25 12.26 9.84 8.70 LOS B B A A Approach: Delay 11.25 12.26 9.46 LOS B B A Intersection Delay 11.37 Intersection LOS B r 26 2.0 �7 Southbound L1 L2 165 3.7 0.26 5.70 415 10.70 B 10.70 B HCS2000: Unsignalizc _. itersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: TenMile/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound I Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L -T R I L T 'R I L T R Volume 50 285 35I 70 320 40 135 70 70 160 120 80 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LT R LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 409 476 115 77 287 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 2 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry group 2 2 5 4a Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 409 476 115 77 287 Left -Turn 55 77 38 0 66 Right -Turn 38 44 0 77 88 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 Prop. Right -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.3 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 2 2 5 4a Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 0. -) 0.2 0.2 I RT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 _ hHV-adj 1.7 .7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.0 -0.0 0.1 -0.6 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 409 476 115 77 287 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.36 0.42 0.10 0.07 0.26 hd, final value 6.99 6.83 8.57 7.88 7.60 x, final value 0.79 0.90 0.27 0.17 0.61- Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 Service Time 5.0 4.8 6.3 5.6 5.6 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 409 476 115 77 287 Service Time 5.0 4.8 6.3 5.6 5.6 Utilization, x 0.79 0.90 0.27 0.17 0.61 Dep. headway, hd 6.99 6.83 8.57 7.88 7.60 - Capacity 496 519 365 327 440 Delay 31.78 44.97 14.47 12.17 21.57 LOS D E B B C Approach: Delay 31.78 44.97 13.54 21.57 LOS D E B C Intersection Delay 31.67 Intersection LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized I , sections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 E-Mail: ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: D thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/6/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: TenMile/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics, Eastbound Westbound Northbound I Southbound IL T R IL T R IL T R IL T R I Volume 150 290 50 170 350 44 190 95 70 1140 220 55 I % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LT R LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 432 513 205 77 460 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 2 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry group 2 2 5 4a Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 432 513 205 77 460 Left -Turn 55 77 100 0 155 Right -Turn 55 48 0 77 61 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.1 .Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 Geometry Group 2 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 h RT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed -0.1 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.1 _ 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 5 4a 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.0 0.1 -0.6 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 432 513 205 77 460 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.38 0.46 0.18 0.07 0.41 hd, final value 8.81 8.83 9.31 9.01 x, final value 1.06 1.26 0.20 1.15 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 Service Time 6.8 6.8 7.0 7.0 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 432 513 205 77 460 Service Time 6.8 6.8 7.0 7.0 Utilization, x 1.06 1.26 0.20 1.15 Dep. headway, hd 8.81 8.83 9.31 9.01 Capacity 432 513 460 Delay 90.64 161.75 14.31 122.19 LOS F F g F Approach: Delay 90.64 161.75 122.19 LOS F F F Intersection Delay Intersection LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized I sections Release 4.1 _ Brian Michels arthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 -Mail: -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS knalyst: D. Thompson agency/Co.: EarthTech )ate Performed: 6/6/01 \nalysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr ntersection: TenMile/Ustick Jurisdiction: \nalysis Year: 2010Background&Site Lt. Turn 'roject ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. 4orth/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I IL T R IL T R IL T R IL T R I I I I I /olume 150 290 50 170 350 55 190 95 70 1140 220 55 I /o Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 configuration L TR 'HF 0.90 0.95 =low Rate 55 357 Heavy Veh 0 0 qo. Lanes 2 Jpposing-Lanes 2 conflicting -lanes 2 -7eometry group 5 Duration, T :0.25 hrs. L TR LT R L TR 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 77 425 205 77 155 288 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 .-low Rates: - Total in Lane 55 357 77 425 205 77 155 288 Left-Tum 55 0 77 0 100 0 155 0 Right -Turn 0 52 0 57 0 77 0 57 Prop. Left-Tums 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Tums 0.0 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 5 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed 0.2 -0.1 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.( 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 5 0.2 -0.6 1.7 0.2 0.2 -0.6 1.7 -0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 0.2 -0.6 1.7 -0.6 0.2 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 55 357 77 425 205 77 155 288 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.05 0.32 0.07 0.38 0.18 0.07 0.14 0.26 hd, final value 8.22 7.93 8.05 7.77 8.58 7.89 8.35 8.03 x, final value 0.13 0.79 0.17 0.92 0.49 0.17 0.36 0.64 Move -up time, m 2.3 - 2.3 2.3 2.3 Service Time 5.9 5.6 5.7 5.5 6.3 5.6 6.1 5.7 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 55 357 77 425 . 205 77 155 288 Service Time 5.9 5.6 5.7 5.5 6.3 5.6 6.1 5.7 Utilization, x 0.13 0.79 0.17 0.92 0.49 0.17 0.36 0.64 Dep. headway, hd 8.22 7.93 8.05 7.77 8.58 7.89 8.35 8.03 Capacity 305 446 327 461 402 327 405 436 Delay 12.10 34.11 12.41 51.42 19.22 ' 12.18 15.67 24.08 LOS ,B D B F C B C C Approach: Delay 31.17 45.44 17.30 21.14 LOS D E C C Intersection Delay 30.44 Intersection LOS D HCS-Signals 4.1 File:: ICHERRY-2001.HCS Pacre HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: B. Michels Inter.: TenMile/Cherry Ln Agency: EarthTech Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/17/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Hr. Year : 2001 Project ID: Falcon Creek E/W St: Cherry Lane N/S St: Ten Mile Rd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Westbound SUMMARY - Northbound Eastbound L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width 1 2 0 L TR 85 309 36 12.0 12.0 1 2 0 L TR 146 333 129 12.0 12.0 1 2 0 L TR 81 310 118 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 L T R 1 2 0 L TR 70 232 42 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination-1- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right - EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.0 25.0 10.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Performance Cycle Summary Length: 84.0 secs Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v c g C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 258 1805 0.36 0.14 33.4 C TR 1057 3553 0.36 0.30 23.4 C 25.4 C Westbound L 258 1805 0.63 0.14 38.7 D TR 1029 3459 0.50 0.30 24.7 C 28.1 C Northbound L 215 1805 0.42 0.12 35.6 D TR 1030 3461 0.46 0.30 24.3 C 26.1 C Southbound L 215 1805 0.36 0.12 35.1 D TR 1050 3527 0.29 0.30 22.8 C 25.3 C Intersection Delay = 26.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 4_1 File: -eaCHERRY-2010 hcs Pacre HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: B. Michels Inter.: TenMile/Cherry Ln Agency: EarthTech Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/17/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Hr. Year : 2010 Background Only Project ID: Falcon Creek E/W St: Cherry Lane N/S St: Ten Mile Rd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Westbound SUMMARY Northbound Eastbound L T R L T R L T R_ No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 2 0 L TR 102 370 43 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 175 398 154 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 97 371 141 12.0 12.0 0 L T R 1 2 0 L TR 84 278 50 12.0.12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 _3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X_ Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.0 25.0 10.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Performance SummarCycle Length: 84.0 secs y Appr Lane Lane Group Adj Sat Flow Rate Ratios Lane Group Approach Grp Capacity (s) v c g C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 258 1805 0.44 0.14 34.1 C TR 1057 3553 0.43 0.30 24.1 C 26.1 C Westbound L 258 TR 1029 Northbound L 215 TR 1030 Southbound L 215 TR 1050 1805 0.75 0.14 46.3 D 3459 0.60 0.30 26.1 C 1805 0.50 0.12 36.5 D 3461 0.55 0.30 25.4 C 1805 0.43 3527 0.35 Intersection Delay = 27.9 31.0 C 27.2 C 0.12 35.8 D 0.30 23.3 C 25.8 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2O00: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: B. Michels Inter.: TenMile/Cherry Ln Agency: EarthTech Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/17/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Hr. Year : 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek E/W St: Cherry Lane N/S St: Ten Mile Rd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Eastbound L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 2 0 L TR 115 370 43 12.0 12.0 0 2 0 TR 411 141 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 175 398 180 12.0 12.0 0 1 L 97 12.0 L T R � 1 2 0 L TR 118 334 71 12.0 12.0 x Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal O erations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds g WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds g NB Right - EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.0 25.0 10.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Performance Summaryycle Length: 84.0 secs Lane Group Flow Rate Ratios Lane Group Approach Grp Capacity (s) v c o 7 c T .." me Eastbound L 258 1805 0.50 0.14 34.7 C TR 1057 3553 0.43 0.30 24.1 C 26.4 C Westbound L 258 TR 1024 1805 3441 0.75 0.14 46.3 D 0.63 0.30 26.7 C 31.2 C Northbound L 215 TR 1033 1805 3472 0.50 0.12 36.5 D 0.59 0.30 26.1 C 27.7 C Southbound L 215 TR 1046 1805 3515 0.61 0.12 40.1 D 0.43 0.30 24.0 C 27.7 C Intersection Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Unsignal;zed Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAI'— TOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: TenMile/McMillan Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2001 Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: McMillan Road North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Northbound Adjustments Movement 1 2 3 Southbound 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 59 8 2 70 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 59 8 2 70 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 36 70 2 2 33 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 36 0 70 0 2 0 2 33 2 Percent Grade 0 0 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storaae No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Approach Delay, NB Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 SB 4 Westbound Eastbound Lane Conf ig LTR LTR 17 8 9 LTR I 10 11 12 LTR v (vph) 4 2 108 C(m) (vph) 1538 1547. 756 37 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.14 750 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.50 0.05 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 0.1610 LOS A A .6 10.0+ Approach Delray B Approach LOS 106 . 10.0+ B B ECS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 1299 North Orchard Street Suite 302 HCS2000: Unsignalizr I-itersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: TenMile/McMillan Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: McMillan Road North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street:. Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 15 120 60 45 155 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 120 60 45 155 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 70 135 70 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 65 10 1.00 1_00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 135 70 30 65 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB _ SB Westbound Movement 1 4 7 Eastbound 1 8 9 Lane Config LTR LTR LTR 10 11 12 LTR v (vph) 15 45 275 C(m) (vph) 1408 1408 105 .529 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.52 95 % queue length 0.03 0.10 432 0.24 2.97 Control Delay 7.6 7.6 18.9 0.94 16.0 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS ►I C 18.9 C C 16.0 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: TenMile/McMillan Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background Project ID: Falcon Creek . East/West Street: McMillan Road North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Intersection Orientation: NS Vehicle Major Street Movements 1 L T R Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments 2 3 4 5 6 L T R Volume 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 120 1.00 ' 60 1.00 45 155 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 30 15 11 39 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 120 . 60 45 155 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 __ __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 Configuration 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 70 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 135 1.00 70 1.00 30 65 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 34 1.00 18 8 16 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 70 135 70 30 65 10 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? HCS2000: Unsignalized ' ,sections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: TenMile/McMillan Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: McMillan Road North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Intersection Orientation: NS Major Street: Approach Movement 1 L T Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 4 5 6 R L T R volume 22 125 70 45 160 5 'eak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 -burly Flow Rate, HFR 22 125 70 45 160 5 'ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 — _ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? _anes 0 1 0 0 .1 0 configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 75 Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? 135 50 30 65 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 75 135 50 30 65 8 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach Movement Lane Config NB LTR No 0 1 0 LTR M Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 LTR j LTR I LTR v (vph) 22 45 260 C(m) (vph) 1426 1390 ,0 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.5r - 95% queue length 0.05 0.10 2.96 Control Delay 7.6 7.7 19.7 LOS A A C Approach Delay 19.7 Approach LOS C 103 419 0.25 0.95 16.4 C 16.4 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: TenMile/McMillan Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: McMillan Road North/South Street: Ten Mile Rd. Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 125 70 45 160 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 6 31 18 11 40 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 125 70 45 160 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — _ 0 _ Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R HCS2000: Unsignir- ead Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: Linder/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2001 Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Linder Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 150 200 50 20 200 50 150 150 50 150 250 50 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 332 299 276 387 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 332 Left -Turn 55 Right -Turn 55 Prop. Left -Turns 0.2 Prop. Right -Turns 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 Geometry Group 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj =0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed -0.1 299 276 387 22 55 55 55 55 55 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 -o.l -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound L1 Westbound Northbound Southbound Flow rate L2 332 L1 L2 299 L1 L2 L1 L2 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 276 3.20 3.20 387 x, initial 0.30 0.27 3.20 3.20 hd, final value 7.23 7.31 0.25 0.34 7.38 7.05 r, final value 0.67 0.61 0.57 -love-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 5.2 `"'5.3 5.4 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ?low Rate 332 299 276 Service Time 5.2 5.3 5.4 Jtilization, x 0.67 0.61 0.57 )ep. headway, hd 7.23 7.31 7.38 '.apacity 455 440 428 )elay 23.50 20.95 19.54 .OS C C C kpproach: Delay 23.50 LOS C Intersection Delay 23.69 0.76 2.0 --x Southbound L1 L2 387 5.1 0.76 7.05 482 28.92 D 20.95 19.54 28.92 C C D Intersection LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalizt _atersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: Linder/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background(Lt.Turn Bay) Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Linder Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 135 285 70 70 Thrus Left Lane 285 35' 170 230 70 85 360 70 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR PHF 0.90 1.00 Flow Rate 150 355 % Heavy Veh 0 0 No. Lanes 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 Geometry group 5 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. L TR L TR L TR 0.90 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 77 320 77 332 94 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 150 355 77 320 Left -Turn 150 0 77 0 77 Right -Turn 0 70 0 35 0 Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Prop. Heavy VehicleO.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 5 5 Adjustments Table 10-40: 77 332 94 430 0 94 0 77 0 70 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 5 hLT-adj h'RT-ad j hHV-adj hadj, computed 0.2 09 0.2 0.2 -0.6 - -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.2 -0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.2 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 150 355 ' 77 320 77 332 94 430 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.13 0.32 0.07 0.28 0.07 0.30 0.08 0.38 hd, final value 8.96 8.64 9.12 8.85 9.07 8.73 8.82 8.52 x, final value 0.37 0.85 0.20 0.79 0.19 0.81 0.23 1.02 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Service Time 6.7 6.3 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.2 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 150 355 77 320 77 332 94 430 Service Time 6.7 6.3 6.8 6.6 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.2 Utilization, x 0.37 0.85 0.20 0.79 0.19 0.81 0.23 1.02 Dep. headway, hd 8.96 8.64 9.12 8.85 9.07 8.73 8.82 8.52 Capacity 399 415 327 403 327 409 344 430 Delay 16.89 44.52 14.01 37.31 13.94 38.94 14.14 77.79 LOS C E B E B E B F Approach: Delay 36.31 32.79 34.24 66.37 LOS E D D F Intersection Delay 43.67 Intersection LOS E HCS2000: Unsignalized ! ,-sections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 E-Mail: ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: D. Thompson Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: Linder/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Linder Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound (L T R IL T R (L T R IL T R I Volume 1135 345 75 135 33070 172 230 70 185 36070 1 Yo Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 616 481 412 571 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes - 1 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T .0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 616 481 412 571 Left -Turn 150 38 80 94 Right-Tum 83 77 77 77 'rop. Left-Tums 0.2 Drop: Right -Turns 0.1 Drop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 geometry Group 1 adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 iadj, computed -0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 - - 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.1 -0.1 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 -low rate 616 481 412 571 id, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.55 0.43 0.37 0.51 id, final value 9.78 9.73 9.74 9.76 final value 1.67 1.30 1.11 1.55 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.8 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 -low Rate 616 481 412 571 Service Time 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.8 Ailization, x 1.67 1.30 1.11 1.55 pep. headway, hd 9.78 9.73 9.74 9.76 rapacity 616 481 412 571 delay 338.46 181.44 112.91 284.64 -OS F F F F \pproach: Delay 338.46 181.44 112.91 284.64 LOS F F F F ntersection Delay 242.70 Intersection LOS F HCS2000: Unsignalized i _ sections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, 1D 83642 phone: 208.855.2000 Fax: 208.855.2060 -Mail: ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS analyst: D. Thompson agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 6/5/01 analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr ntersection: Linder/Ustick Jurisdiction: knalysis Year: 2010Background&Site Lt. Turn 'roject ID: Falcon Creek ast/West Street: Ustick Rd. Borth/South Street: Linder Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I (L T R IL T R IL T R IL T R I /olume 1135 345 75 135 33070 172 230 70 185 360 70 Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 configuration L TR L TR L TR L TR 'HF 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 ::low Rate 150 .437 38 415 80 332 94 451 Vo Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 qo. Lanes 2 2 2 2 Dpposing-Lanes 2 2 2 2 conflicting -lanes 2 2 2 2 geometry group 5 5 5 5 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 150 437 Left -Turn 150 0 38 415 80 332 94 451 Right-Tum 0 78 38 0 80 0 72 0 0 77 94 0 0 73 Prop. Left-Tums 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Tums 0.0 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 5 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed 0.2 -0.1 1.0 0.0 1.0 OX ).2 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0.0 5 5 0.2 -0.6 1.7 0.2 0.2 -0.6 1.7 -0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 0.2 -0.6 1.7 -0.1 0.2 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 150 437 38 415 80 332 94 451 id, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 K, initial 0.13 0.39 0.03 0.37 0.07 0.30 0.08 0.40 -id, final value 9.29 8.98 9.35 9.05 9.53 9.19 9.31 9.01 K, final value 0.39 1.09 0.10 1.04 0.21 0.85 0.24 1.13 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Service Time 7.0 6.7 7.1 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.0 6.7 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ::low Rate 150 437 38 415 80 332 94 451 Service Time 7.0 6.7 7.1 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.0 6.7 Jtilization, x 0.39 1.09 0.10 1.04 0.21 0.85 0.24 1.13 Dep. headway, hd 9.29 8.98 9.35 9.05 9.53 9.19 9.31 9.01 rapacity 388 437 288 415 330 392 344 451 Delay 17.74 101.45 13.07 87.24 14.77 45.95 14.97 114.33 -OS C F B F B E B F kpproach: Delay 80.05 81.02 39.89 97.20 LOS F F E F ntersection Delay 76.67 Intersection LOS F ECS2000: Unsign: -- ed Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: Linder/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: Linder Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 60 240 60 24 240 60 60 180 60 60 299 60 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR PHF Flow Rate 0.90 398 0.90 0.90 LTR 0.90 % Heavy Veh 0 358 0 332 464 No. Lanes 1 1 0 0 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 398 Left -Turn 66 Right -Turn 66 Prop. Left -Turns 0.2 Prop. Right -Turns 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 Geometry Group . 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed -0.1 Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 358 332 464 26 66 66 66 66 66 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.1 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Flow rate L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 398 358 332 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 320 3.20 3.20 3.20 464 . x, initial 0.35 0.32 3.20 3.20 hd, final value 9.26 0.30 0.41 9.39 9.55 9.27 x, final value 1.02 0.93 0.88 - Move -up time, m 2.0 2 , 19 Service Time 7.3 .0 �„� 7.4 2.0 2_0 7.6 ':3 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound L1 L2 Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 398 358 Service Time �7.3 7'4 332 464 Utilization, x 1. 0.93 7-6 7.3 Dep. headway, hd 9.26 99 3. 0.88 1.19 Capacity 398 9 5 5 . 9.27 DelLOSaY 82.99 62.09 52.87 464 F F 138.98 Approach: F F Delay 82.99 F 62.09 52:87 138.98 Intersection Delay 88.46 F Intersection F LOS F F r HCS2000: Unsigna _ ed Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: B1ackCat/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2001 Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: BlackCat Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound L T Westbound Northbound Southbound R L T R L T R L T R Volume 7 121 1 22 102 4 12 32 30 7 % Thrus Left Lane 50 4 Eastbound Westbound Ll Northbound Southbound L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 142 0•90 LTR 0.90 Heavy Veh 0 141 0 81 66 No. Lanes 1 1 0 0 opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. 1 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 142 141 81 Left -Turn 7 24 66 Right -Turn 1 13 7 Prop. Left -Turns 0.0 4 0.2 33 4 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 Geometry Group 1 0.0 0.0 Adjustments Table 10-40: 1 1 1 hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj - -0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 hHV-adj 1.7 -.7 -1.7 -0.6 1 hadj, computed 0.0 ' 0.0 1.7 1.7 -0.2 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Northbound SouthboundL2 Ll L2 Flow rate 142 141 I'1 L2 L1 L2 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 3.2 3.13 81 3.20 3.20 66 3.20 hd, final value 4.42 0.07 3.20 0.06 4.43 4.43 4.64 x, final value 0.17 0.17 -- 0.10 n 09 - Move -up time, m 2.0 2'0 2.0 Service Time 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.0 "' 6 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound L1 Westbound Northbound Southbound L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 142 141 81 service Time 2.4 2.4 2.4 66 Utilization, x 0.17 0.17 0.10 .6 Dep. headway, hd 4.42 4.43 4.43 0 .09 Capacity 392 4.64 Delay 8.35 89 36 7.91 316 LOS A A 8.07 Approach: A A Delay51 LOS 8.35 8.36 7. 8.07 Intersection Delay A 8.22 A Intersection A LOS A A 0 ECS2000: Unsignz.-,Led Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fax: 208.855.2005 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 .Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: BlackCat/Ustick .Jurisdiction: :Analysis Year: 2010 Background Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: BlackCat Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound L T R Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R Volume 9 145 2 27 122 5 15 Thrus Left Lane 39 36 9 60 5 Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Configuration LTR LTR 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 173 LTRPELF 0.90 LTR 0.90 % Heavy Veh 0 170 0 99 81 No. Lanes 1 0 0 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry1 group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. 1 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 173 Left -Turn 10 Right -Turn 2 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 Geometry Group 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 170 99 81 30 16 10 5 40 5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 0.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.2 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Flow rate Ll 17373 L2 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.25 hd, final value 4.55 Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 170 99 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 0.15 0.09 4.57 4.61 Southbound Ll L2 81 3.20 3.20 0.07 4.83 x, final value 0.22 0.22 0.13 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 2.6 `. 2.6 2.6 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service. Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 173 170 99 Service Time 2.6 2.6 2.6 Utilization, x 0.22 0.22 0.13 Dep. headway, hd 4.55 4.57 4.61 Capacity 423 420 349 Delay 8.83 8.82 8.28 LOS A h_ A A A p. proac Delay 8.83 LOS A Intersection Delay 8.66 0.11 2.0 Southbound L1 L2 81 2.8 0.11 4.83 331 8.42 A' 8.82 8.28 8.42 A A A Intersection LOS A HCS2000: Unsigne Brian Michels :ed Intersections Release 4.1 v EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208.855.2000 E-Mail: Fan: 208.855.2060 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/17/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hr Intersection: B1ackCat/Ustick Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Background & Site Project ID: Falcon Creek East/West Street: Ustick Rd. North/South Street: B1ackCat Rd. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound L T R Northbound L T R L T R LSouthbou T R R Volume 9 159 2 31 140 5 15 Thrus Left Lane 39 38 9 60 5 Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 188 LTR 0.90 LTR 0.90 194 % Heavy Veh p 0 101 81 81 No. Lanes 1 0 p Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. 1 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 188 194 Left -Turn 10 34 101 81 Right -Turn 2 16 10 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 5 0.2 42 5 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy VehicleO.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 Geometry Group 1 0.0 0.0 Adjustments Table 10-40: 1 1 1 hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 0.2 hHV-adj -0.6 0.2 -0.6 0.2 hadj, computed p.p 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.6 1.7 0.0 -0.2 -0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Ll L2 L1 Northbound Southbound Flow rate 188 L2 194 hd, initial value 3.20 L1 L2 101 L1 L2 3 x, initial .20 3.20 3.20 hd, final 0.17 3.20 3.20 81 3.20 3.20 value 4. .60 4.61 0.09 0.07 4.71 4.94 x, final value 0.24 0.25 0.13 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 2.6 �' 2.6 2.7 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 188 194 101 Service Time 2.6 2.6 2.7 Utilization, x 0.24 0.25 0.13 Dep. headway, hd 4.60 4.61 4.71 Capacity 438 444 351 Delay 9.05 9.12LOS 8.42 A h. A '� A pproac . Delay 9.05 LOS A Intersection Delay 8.89 ^ 11 .. 2.0 9 Southbound L1 L2 81 2.9 0.11 4.94 331 8.56 A 9.12 8.42 8.56 A A A Intersection LOS A ECS2000: Unsigna ',ed Intersections Release 4.1 •____TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/21/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Ten Mile/Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Development (North Entrance) East/West Street: Business Park Entrance North/South Street: Ten Mile Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments Movement 1 Eastbqund. 2 Wes tbound L T 3 R 4 L 5 T 6 R Volume 18 112 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 112 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type Undivided -- RT Channelized? Lanes No Configuration 1 1 Upstream Signal? L R No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 Southbound L T R I 10 L 11 12 T R Volume 27 90 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 134 11 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 90 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 134 11 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? RT Channelized? Storage No Lanes 0 1 Configuration LT 1 0 TR Delay, 4pproach EB Hovement 1 Lane Config L V (vph) "_(m) (vph) V/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length, and Level of Service Northbound Southbound 4 I 7 8 9 10 11 LT 12 I TR 1636 823 445 0.01 0.14 758 0.03 0.49 0.19 7.2 10.1 0.70 A B 10.9 10.1 B 10.9 B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 HCS2000: Unsignz -,ed Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY knalyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/21/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Ten Mile/Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Development (South Entrance) East/West Street: Business Park Entrance North/South Street: Ten Mile Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments Movement 1 Eastbound 2 Westbound L T 3 R 4 L 5 T 6 R Volume 4 48 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 48 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type Undivided -- RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 No Configuration L R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 11 117 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 130 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 117 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 130 4 Percent Grade (�) 0 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage No RT Channelized? Lanes ` Configuration 0 1 LT 14, A r oach pp Delaay► Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 WB 4 Northbound Sout1bound Lane Config L 17 LT 8 9 10 11 I 12 TR v (vph) 4 128 C(m) (vph) v/c 1636 881 134 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.51 843 0.16 Control Delay 7.2 9.8 0.56 LOS A A 10.1 Approach Delay B Approach LOS 9.8 10.1 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release A Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Suite 301 Rd. HCS2000: Unsigna _led Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/21/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Ten Mile/Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Development (East Entrance) East/West Street: Ustick Road North/South Street: TenMile Business Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments Movement 1 Eastbound Westbound 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 208 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 412 9 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 208 412 9 Median Type Undivided - RT Channelized? Lanes 1 No Configuration 1 1 Upstream Signal? T No T R No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound M Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? RT Channelized? Storage Lanes Configuration 1 R No A r oach Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pp EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 17 I Southbound Lane Config 8 9 10 11 12 v (vph) R C(m) (vph) 4 v/c 644 95% queue length 0.01 Control Delay 0.02 LOS 10.6 Approach Delay B Approach LOS 10.6 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Suite 301 Rd. ECS2000: Unsigne -ed Intersections Release 4.1 ..-, _,TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUNIlWy Analyst: B. Michels Agency/Co.: EarthTech Date Performed: 5/21/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Ten Mile/Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Ten Mile/Ustick Business Park Development (West Entrance) East/West Street: Ustick Road North/South Street: TenMile Business Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments Movement 1 Eastbound 2 Westbound L T 3 4 R L 5 T 6 R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PEP 16 190 1.00 1'00 333 79 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 190 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy'Vehicles 06 333 79 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 No Configuration 1 1 Upstream Signal? L T T R No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 Southbound L T 10 R L 11 T 12 Volume R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 18 18 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Vehicles 18 18 Percent Grade 0 0 0 !iedian Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? 2T Channelized? Storage Lanes :�onfiguration Delay, -kpproach EB Kovement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) '(m) (vph) P/C 95% queue length ::ontrol Delay LOS Approach Delay kpproach LOS 1158 0.01 0.04 8.2 A No 1 1 L R Queue Length, and Level of Service 4 Northbound Southbound 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 L R 489 0.04 0.11 12.6 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Brian Michels EarthTech 3071 E. Franklin Rd. Suite 301 11.4 B 713 0.03 0.08 10.2 B Earth Tech Location :Sundance/Nestern Recycling 3071 E. Franklin Rd Counted by:S.F. Suite Study Name: SUNDUEST City :Nampa, ID Meridian, IDD 83642 Site Code : 00005801 Other Start Date: 05/08/01 Cars,Trucks Page : 1 ISundance lNestern Recycling Entrance Sundance ISouthbound lNestbound ' western Recycling Entrance INorihbound Eastbound Start I Aprchl Aprchl Aprchl Time Ri ht Thru Left Other Total Ri ht Thru Left Other Total Ri ht Thru Left Other Total Right Thru Left Other TotalAprch lTotal D5/08/01 I I Intvl 16:001 0 13 1 0 141 0 0 4 0 41 1 7 0 0 81 1 16:151 0 10 1 0 111 0 0 3 0 31 5 6 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 01 26 1 16:301 0 13 2 0 151 4 0 2 0 6 0 5 01 25 16:45 0 0 S 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 12 9 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 p 0 1 OI 26 Hour1 0 47 4 0 511 4 0 10 0 141 8 27 0 0 351 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 i I I I 1 17:001 0 8 0 0 81 0 0 2 0 21 1 13 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 17:151 0 10 2 0 121 0 0 1 0 11 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 OI 2OI 24 16 17:301 0 13 1 0 141 2 0 0 0 21 1 19 0 0 161 0 0 0 0 01 17:45 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 01 36 Hourl 0 40 3 0 431 2 0 3 0 51 2 65 0 0 671 0 0 0 0 01 115 1 1 1 I Totall 0 87 7 0 941 6 0 13 0 191 10 92 0 0 1021 0 0 0 0 OI 215 Apr.1 - 92.5 7.4 - -1 31.5 - 68.4 - -1 9.8 90.1 _ _ _ Int.1 - 40.4 3.2 - -1 2.7 - b,p _ -1 — -1 ' -I 4.6 42.7 - - -1 - - -i leak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 05/08/01 to 17:45 on 05/08/01 Time 1 17: 0 1 17: 00 1 17: 00 1 17: 00 VOL. 1 0 40 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 65 0 0 0 0 a 1 Pct. 1 0.0 93.0 6.9 0.0 1 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 1 2.9 97.0 0.0 0.0 1 otal 43 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 High i 17:30 1 17:30 117:30 1 0 1 Vol. 1 0 13 1 0 1 1 17:30 I 'otal 1 14 i 2 0 0 0 1 1 19 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 PHF 10.767 0.625 1 20 1 0 I 1 10.837 10.000 I Location :Sundance/western Recycling -- Counted by:S.F. City :Nampa, ID Other _ outhbound: Sundance 'estbound: Western Recycling Entrance orthbound: Sundance astbound: Western Recycling Entrance Earth Tech 3071 E. Franklin Rd Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Sundance 40 3 67 w 110 Western Reemeling Entrance 05/08/01 'C 2 05.00pM 05:45pn 115 10 �- 3 --} 5 Western Recycling Entrance N 110 � T � 65 43 2 Sundance Study Name: SUNDWEST Site Code : 00005801 Start Date: 05/08/01 Location :Ten Mile/Cherry Lane Earth Tech _ 3071 E_ Franklin Rd Counted by:S.F. Study Name: TENCHERY City :Meridian, ID Suite 301 Site Code : 00005901 Meridian, ID 83642 Other Start Date: 05/09/01 1 Cars,Trucks Page ITen Mile Cherry Lane ISouthbound Ten Mile Cherry Lane Westbound INorthbound ;tart I Aprch Eastbound l Aprch Aprch Aprchlntvl ime lRight Thru Left Other Total Ri ht Thru Left Other Total Ri ht Thru Left Other Total Ri ht Thru left Other TotallTotat )5/09/01 ! 16:001 16 42 22 0 801 22 60 23 0 1051 25 49 19 2 951 8 42 13 1 641 344 16:151 8 45 18 0 711 28 92 27 0 1471 22 58 10 0 901 17 58 15 1 911 399 16:301 12 45 18 0 751 17 66 33 0 1161 26 55 15 4 16:45 8 42 1001 6 71 19 0 961 387 14 0 64 29 102 35 0 1661 28 68 11 Hourj 44 174 72 0 2901 96 320 118 0 5341 101 230 55 7 3931 41 240 64 8 3531 1570 1 1 I I 17:001 7 44 21 0 721 29 94 33 0 1561 29 75 30 1 135� 5 72 17 0 94' 457 17:151 13 52 15 1 811 35 87 31 0 1531 37 7-7161 1311 13 93 25 6 1371 502 17:301 10 65 15 5 951 38 77 43 5 1631 22 89 19 4 1341 11 17:45 12 71 19 2 75 82 17 5 1151 507 104 27 39 1 142 30 69 16 4 Hour 42 232 70 8 3521 129 333 146 6 6141 118 310 81 10 5191 36 309 85 11 4411 1926 I 1 Total 86 406 142 8 6421 225 653 264 6 11481 219 540 136 17 9121 77 549 149 - 19 7941 3496 Apra 13.3 63.2 22.1 1.2 19.5 56.8 22.9 0.5 24.0 59.2 14.9 1.8 Int.) 2.4 11.6 4.0 0-2 -� 6.4 18.6 7.5 0.1 -� 6.2 15.4 3.8 0.4 2.29.669.1 10.3 -� -� 15.7 4.7 .2 0.5 -� eak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 05/09/01 to 17:45 on 05/09/01 Time 17:00 17:00 17:00 1 17:00 vol. � 42 232 70 $ � � 129 333 146 6 118 310 81 10 Pct. 11.9 65.9 19.8 2.2 21.0 54.2 23.7 0.9614 36 309 85 11 f otal 352 22.7 59.7 15.6 1.9 8.1 70.0 19.2 2.4 High 17:45 � 17:37:30 519 441 Vol. 12 71 19 2 ( 38 T7 43 5 17:00 17:15 I otal 104 163 29 135 75 30 1 13 93 25 6 PHF 10.846 10-941 137 I0.961 10.804 ' Location :Ten Mile/Cherry Lane Counted by:S_F. City :Meridian, ID Other iouthbound: Ten Mile Westbound: Cherry Lane iorthbound: Ten Mile astbound: Cherry Lane Earth Tech 3071 E. Franklin Rd Suite 301 Meridian, ID 83642 Study Name: TENCHERY Site Code : 00005901 Start Date: 05/09/01 LOW 9" em:...,.. avow rosnieoE�.j �� d OtWO ?IbTOZ 3 § g 1Vld A2 VmWT-w - 1N34=IOTaAW SIT-IM e°io a I I I I I I I I �I I I L-- 3AV ATiNnH 'N if L I s 4 all a W Z l yi& 4 i 40 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION THIS DECLARATION is made on the last date herein below set forth, by Falcon Crest, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company, by and through its Managing Member, A. Leon Blaser, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "property," more particularly described as follows: SE 1/4 of Section 34, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that all of said property is and shall be held and conveyed upon and subject to the easements, conditions, covenants, restrictions, and reservations hereinafter set forth. Said easements, covenants, restrictions, conditions, and reservations shall constitute covenants to run with the land and shall be binding upon all persons claiming under them, and shall inure to the benefit of and be limitations upon all future Owners of said property or any interest therein. ARTICLE ONE Definitions 1.1 "McNelis Business Owners' Association" shall mean and refer to McNelis Business Owners' Association, its successors and assigns. It is also referred to in this Declaration as "Association." Whenever an action is to be taken by the Association, it shall be taken by its manager or managers, its officers, its committees, or agents, representatives, or employees, as authorized and designated by the Association's articles of organization or operating agreement. 1.2 "Declarant" shall mean and refer to Falcon Creek, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company, its successors and assigns. "Declaration" shall mean and refer to this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for McNelis Subdivision, official records of Ada County, Idaho. 1.3 "Lot" or "lot" shall mean and refer to any plot of land shown upon any recorded Subdivision Plat of the property. 1.4 "Common Area" shall mean and refer to any lot, area, or system whereby the principal dedicated use or purpose of that lot, area or system, as further described on the Plat of the Subdivision or in this Declaration, is for the common use or benefit of all lot Owners, and shall include any attachments or improvements to or on such lot, area or system. Common Areas shall be owned and maintained by the McNelis Business Owners' Association. The Common Areas and their uses are more particularly described in Article 4 of this Declaration. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page i 1.5 "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner of any lot in this Subdivision but shall exclude the Association as the owner or operator of the Common Areas and shall exclude any Mortgagee interest in a lot. 1.6 "Plat" shall mean the recorded plat of McNelis Subdivision, official records of Ada County, Idaho. 1.7 "Subdivision" shall mean the entire McNelis Subdivision, according to its Plat. 1.8 "Architectural Control Committee" (also referred to as "McNelils ACC") shall mean an association of not less than one and not more than three individuals who shall be appointed by the Declarant, whose primary responsibility is to review and approve or disapprove each application for the construction of buildings and improvements on a lot within the Plat, and to take those other actions authorized by this Declaration. A. Leon Blaser is appointed by Declarant as a standing member of the McNelis Subdivision ACC, until he shall resign. Additionally, A. Leon Blaser shall be entitled to designate another person to act on his behalf. This McNelis Subdivision ACC may act as an informal association, or may be incorporated or formed as an Idaho limited liability company as Declarant shall elect. 1.9 "Irrigation District" shall mean an irrigation district duly organized under Idaho law who shall supply irrigation water appurtenant to the Subdivision. Irrigation water shall be delivered to each lot by a Service Provider and apportioned to each lot Owner or to the Common Areas on each lot in the Subdivision through a pressurized water system, in a manner more fully described in Article 7. The allocation and apportionment of costs related to the delivery of pressurized irrigation water and for the maintenance of the system, is further described in Article 4. 1.10 "Service Provider" shall mean either the Irrigation District or another entity formed by the Declarant for the purposes set forth herein, and who has contracted with the Declarant or with the Association, to own and/or operate, maintain, and repair the pressurized irrigation system and make corresponding allocations of irrigation water and assessments, all according to Articles 4 and 7 of this Declaration. 1.11 "Highway District" shall mean Ada County Highway District, or "ACHD," who shall operate and maintain storm drainage facilities located in public rights of way subject to those limitations set out in Article g. ACHD does not have responsibility for on -site lot drainage, and each lot owner shall be solely responsible for on -site lot drainage. ARTICLE TWO General Development and Use Restrictions 2.1 Land use. Each Owner lot in this Subdivision is intended to be used for (commercial) non-residential purposes, including offices, of the type that is permitted DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 2 by the zone ascribed to the Subdivision by the City of Meridian, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Declaration. 2.2 Construction Review and Approval. Each Owner, including any contractor, builder, or agent for an Owner, intending to construct a building and improvements on an Owner's lot, shall do so only if the following conditions have been met: a. Each Owner shall first submit an application for construction authority to the McNelis ACC. No Owner shall be entitled to construct a building or improvement upon his lot, unless and until the Owner has received the written approval of McNelis ACC, according to the provisions of this Declaration. The application form to McNelis ACC seeking approval shall include a complete description of the plans for the main building, all outbuildings, and improvements, parking lots, and landscaping. The plans shall be prepared or approved by a qualified architect. No fee shall be charged by McNelis ACC for its initial review of the Owner's plans submitted for approval. However, in the event that McNelis ACC has refused to approve Owner's plans as submitted, and thereafter Owner seeks a reconsideration of that refused approval, then Owner shall pay a fee of $200.00 to the McNelis ACC as a part of the request for reconsideration, which fee is intended to provide McNelis ACC with resources to retain supplemental expertise to complete the reconsideration review. b. No building or improvement shall be constructed unless the Owner has also obtained a building permit from the City of Meridian and any other governmental agency with jurisdiction over construction on the Owner's lot. C. All construction, including permitted outbuildings and improvements, shall strictly follow all of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions in this Declaration, all requirements established by the McNelis ACC as a part of its written approval, and all of the requirements of the City of Meridian and other governmental entities with jurisdictional authority to impose requirements on land use. d. Owners understand that McNelis ACC will be reviewing each Owner's plans for the construction of building and improvements on an Owner's Lot for their overall compatibility with adjacent residential properties to the south of the Owner's Lot, and that McNelis ACC shall be entitled to consider, as a part of the approval process, certain compatibility factors, including but not limited to building/ improvements heights, color coordination, integration of landscaping, light locations, and others. 2.3 Setbacks and Utility Corridors. Each building and improvement shall be constructed within the minimum setback requirements as established by the City of Meridian, and those that are described on the Plat. An Owner shall not place any permanent obstruction in a utility corridor, a Common Area or within any easement identified on the Plat. 2.4 Landscaping. The following provisions shall govern the landscaping of all lots in the Subdivision: DECLARATION OF COVENANT'S, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 3 a. Each Owner, at his sole and separate cost, shall cause that portion of the Common Area located on his lot (designated as the Landscape Common Area), to be landscaped in a style complimentary to the style, size, and value of the commercial building as required by the City of Meridian, and/or as required by the McNelis ACC. b. All required landscaping, including connections to the Common Area pressurized irrigation system, shall be fully installed and completed within ninety (go) days after completion of the commercial building on the lot. Completion shall mean a state of completion sufficient to obtain an occupancy permit. 2.5 Fences. A lot Owner shall not install or construct any fences on a lot unless specific written approval is given by the McNelis ACC. Declarant has constructed and installed perimeter fences on certain boundaries of the Subdivision. The maintenance and repair of all perimeter fences constructed by Declarant shall thereafter be performed by the lot Owner as to that portion of the fence that is on a boundary line of Owner's lot, all at the Owner's sole and separate cost. 2.6 Nuisances. An Owner shall not carry on any noxious or offensive activity on a lot, nor conduct or permit activities which may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to the other lot Owners. 2.7 Signs. No signs shall be constructed or installed by an Owner unless and until the Owner has received written approval from the McNelis ACC and the City of Meridian, and then such signs shall be constructed and installed according to the terms and conditions of the written approvals. 2.8 Garbage and Refuse Disposal. Trash, garbage, and other waste shall be maintained in sanitary containers or in a permanent facility for that purpose. Each Owner shall maintain any facility for garbage and waste storage in a clean and sanitary condition. 2.9 Parking and Access. Each Owner shall provide for adequate vehicle parking in approved areas on his lot, together with proper access driveways to and from the parking areas to the Common Area ingress and egress access Easement, all according to the use purposes of the lot, and according to the requirements of the City of Meridian. Each Owner shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of any parking area and vehicle access driveways on that Owner's lot. 2.10 Hazardous Activities. No Owner shall conduct any activity on a lot which is or might be unsafe or hazardous to any person or property; nor any activity that is not allowed within the zone as established by the City of Meridian. 2.11 Reconstruction. In any case where it is necessary to reconstruct a commercial building or make any permitted improvement on a lot after the initial construction has been authorized by the McNelis ACC, the Owner shall thereafter submit all reconstruction/improvement plans to the City of Meridian and obtain a building permit DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 4 before the reconstruction/improvement is commenced. Once a permit is obtained, then the reconstruction or improvement shall be prosecuted diligently, continuously, and without delay from time of commencement thereof until such structure is fully completed. ARTICLE THREE Utilities and Utility Easements and Declarant Reservations 3.1 Utility Services. Each Owner's lot shall be served with underground utility sources for power, gas, water, sewer, and telephone services; which utilities shall be installed in the streets or in the platted easement rights -of -way. The costs of bringing utility services, other than power and telephone lines, to the Owner's lot are the sole and separate cost of the Declarant. With regard to power and telephone, Declarant shall only be responsible for bringing the conduit for power and telephone services to the Owner's lot, and the Owner shall be solely and separately responsible for the actual cost of bringing the power and telephone lines ultimately selected by Owner. Declarant is entitled to recover any and all connection fees or escrowed funds advanced by Declarant to any respective utility provider, if any, incurred to bring these services to the lots of the Subdivision. The Owner, or the Owner's builder constructing an Owner's building/improvements, shall be solely responsible for any additional costs for any final hookup costs charged by a utility company as a condition precedent to final connection, as well as for any costs to obtain any other utility service not supplied to the Subdivision by Declarant. 3.2 Platted Easements. Declarant reserves an access right-of-way to all of the Common Areas and to the easements as shown and noted on the plat of the Subdivision for the purpose of constructing water mains, electric distribution lines, sewer lines, gas pipelines, pressurized irrigation lines, and other utilities and purposes as may be necessary, convenient, and desirable for the Owners of lots within the Subdivision. Additionally, Declarant reserves an access easement along the entire length of the westerly boundary of Lot 62 and Lot 61, a width of twenty (20) feet, for the purpose of maintenance ingress and egress access to and from W. Overland Road to a drainage pond located within the McNelis Subdivision, Records of Ada County, Idaho. 3.3 Licenses, Easements, and Rights -of -Way. The Declarant shall also have the right to grant and convey to any third party such licenses, easements, and rights -of -way in, on, or under the Common Areas as may be necessary to complete Declarant's covenants to the City of Meridian, ACHD, obligations created under this Declaration, and for the appropriate and orderly maintenance of the Subdivision and for the preservation of the health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the Owners, including but not limited to the constructing, erecting, operating, or maintaining any of the following: a. Underground lines, cables, wires, conduits, and other devices for the transmission of electricity for lighting, heating, power, telephone, and other purposes; DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 5 b. Public sewers, storm drains, water drains and pipes, water systems, sprinkling systems, water, heating, and gas lines or pipes; and C. Any similar public or quasi -public improvements or facilities, including but not limited to access easements, micro -path walkways, pressurized irrigation systems, and fences. However, nothing contained in this right shall obligate Declarant to make a grant of a license, easement or right of way, except as Declarant alone shall decide. ARTICLE FOUR Common Areas, Uses and Maintenance. 4.1 Generally. Declarant hereby establishes the following Common Areas: a. Lot 61. Lot 61, as identified on the Plat, is a lot running along the southerly boundary of the Subdivision. A portion of Five Mile Creek is situate within this lot and is subject to an easement in favor of Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The Association is required to provide maintenance to Lot 61 as a common expense. b. Landscape Easement Strip. This Landscape Easement Strip is identified on the Plat and is approximately 30 feet in width running along the northerly boundary of the Subdivision parallel to W. Overland Road. Each Owner of a lot affected by this Easement shall be required to install landscaping materials in that portion of the strip that is situate on the Owner's lot. However, once the landscaping in this Easement strip is installed, together with the pressurized irrigation system, the maintenance of the Landscape Easement Strip shall be provided by the Association as a common expense. C. Multiple -Use Pathway. The Multiple -Use Pathway are depicted on the Plat as meandering pathways primarily running adjacent to Five Mile Creek on the northerly end of the Subdivision, and running adjacent to Nine Mile Creek on the westerly boundary of the Subdivision. These Multile-Use Pathways meander and encumber portions of Owners' property. Once installed, the maintenance of the ultiple- Use Pathway shall be provided by These Multiple - Use Pathways are for the primary benefit of the public, subject to the right of the Association to impose reasonable rules of usage to protect Owners' property. d. Common Cross Access/Ingress-Egress Easement. The Plat identifies Common Cross Access/Ingress-Egress Easements (hereinafter "Common Access Easements") which provide the exclusive method of ingress and egress for vehicle traffic to and from each Lot in the Subdivision. The Common Access Easements shall also provide the sole source of ingress -egress to and from each parking area placed on respective Owner's lot. Each Owner shall have an in -common right of use of the Common Access Easement with all other Owners and their respective business guests and invitees. This Common Access Easement cannot be dissolved or abandoned DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 6 without the prior written consent of the City of Meridian. This Common Access Easement may also provide locations for utilities and for drainage. Declarant shall establish the location of this Common Access Easement. However, the final surfacing (pavement) of the Common Access Easement shall be accomplished by each Lot Owner at his sole and separate cost within the boundaries of his respective Lot, and shall be accomplished in a manner sufficient for vehicular traffic according to the requirements of the City of Meridian and ACHD. Final paving shall be completed by an Owner by the time the Owner receives his certificate of occupancy. Once each Owner has caused the paving of his respective section of the Common Access Easement, then all subsequent maintenance of the Common Access Easement shall be performed by the Association as a common area expense. e. Pressurized Irrigation System. Declarant intends to install a pressurized irrigation system to provide pressurized irrigation water to the Landscape Easement Strip and to other Common Areas within the Subdivision. The system is more fully described in Article 7 in this Declaration. Each Owner will receive a lot pro -rated periodic invoice from the Service Provider, and from time to time may receive pro -rated charges for maintenance to the system as provided by the Service Provider. Each Owner understands and accepts that the pressurized irrigation system is a part of a larger system providing water to other subdivisions, and that the Declarant cannot and does not warrant the performance of the system after it has been accepted by the Service Provider, nor does Declarant warrant the quantity or quality of the pressurized irrigation water. 4.2 Operation and Maintenance Costs of Common Areas All costs and expenses incurred for the operation and maintenance of the Subdivision's Common Areas, as incurred by the Association, shall be the sole and separate cost of the Association, to be borne in common by all lot Owners. Each Lot Owner accepts the fact that an Owner does not have direct control over the operation and maintenance of Common Areas, and must abide by the decisions of the Association. 4.3 Pressurized Irrigation. Each Owner shall receive a separate pro-rata bill from the Service Provider for pressurized irrigation water available to the Owner's lot, and each Owner agrees to pay that bill whether or not the Owner uses the available irrigation water. Each Owner grants to the Service Provider a right to lien the Owner's lot for non payment and to foreclose that lien in a manner permitted by law. 4.4 Parking Lot and other Lighting. Each Owner shall install such parking lot and street lights as the City of Meridian shall require upon each Owner's respective Lot by the time Owner has received his certificate of occupancy and at each Owner's sole and separate cost. Once all of the required parking and street lights are installed, the subsequent maintenance of those lights shall be a common area expense to be borne by the Association. ARTICLE FIVE DECLARATION OF COVENANT'S, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 7 Owners Association 5.1 Organization of Association. The Declarant shall form the McNelis Business Owners' Association as an Idaho Limited Liability Company, hereinafter "Association." It shall be formed as a non-profit entity and shall be member managed. The articles of organization and the operating agreement for the Association shall be consistent with this Declaration. 5.2 Membership. Each lot Owner, by virtue of being such an Owner and for so long as such ownership is maintained, shall be a member of the Association. Membership in the Association shall not be assignable except to the successor in interest of an Owner, and each membership in the Association shall be appurtenant to the lot owned by such Owner. Membership in the Association shall not be transferred, pledged, or alienated in any way except upon the transfer of title to said lot, and then only to the transferee of title to said lot. Any attempt to make a prohibited transfer of membership shall be void and will not be reflected on the records of the Association. Each lot Owner shall be entitled to one vote for each lot owned. When more than one person is an owner of a lot, then those multiple owners shall designate a representative to vote the lot Owner's interests. In no event shall more than one vote be cast with respect to any lot. 5.3 Association Business Affairs. The business affairs of the Association shall be conducted by an Outside Manager or by Board of Member Representatives as established in the articles of organization or operating agreement. Each member shall be entitled to vote for the Manager and for the Board of Member Representatives for the terms set forth in the operating agreement. 5.4 Powers of the Association. The Association, through its Manager or Board of Member Representatives, shall have all the powers of a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, subject only to such limitations upon the exercise of such powers as are expressly set forth in the articles of organization, the operating agreement, and by this Declaration. The Association shall have the power to do any and all lawful things which may be authorized, required, or permitted to be done by it under this Declaration, the articles of organization, and the operating agreement, and to do and perform any and all acts which may be necessary or proper for, or incidental to, the proper management and operation of and the performance of the other responsibilities herein assigned, including without limitation: a. Assessment. The power to levy assessments (monthly, special, and limited) on the Owners of lots and to force payment of such assessments, all in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. b. Right of Enforcement. The power and authority from time to time, in its own name, on its own behalf, or on behalf of any Owner or Owners who consent thereto, to commence and maintain actions and suits to restrain and enjoin any breach or threatened breach of this Declaration or the operating agreement, including Association DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 8 rules adopted pursuant to this Declaration, and to enforce by mandatory injunction or otherwise all provisions hereof. C. Delegation of Powers. The Association shall have the authority to delegate its power and duties to a manager, Board, committees, officers, employees, or to any person, firm, or corporation to act as manager. d. Emergency Powers. The Association or any person authorized by it may enter upon any lot in the event of any emergency involving illness or potential danger to life or property, or when necessary in connection with any maintenance or construction for which the Association is responsible. Such entry shall be made with as little inconvenience to the Owner as is practicable, and any damage caused thereby shall be repaired by the Association and at its sole cost and expense. e. Association Rules. The power to adopt, amend, and repeal by majority vote of the Owners, such rules and regulations as the Association deems reasonable (the "Association rules"). The Association rules shall govern the use of the Common Areas by the Owners, their business guests and invitees; provided, however, the Association rules may not discriminate among Owners and shall not be inconsistent with this Declaration or the operating agreement. A copy of the Association rules, as they may from time to time be adopted, amended, or repealed, shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to each owner. Upon adoption and delivery to all Owners, Association rules shall have the same force and effect as if they were set forth in and were a part of this Declaration. f. Licenses, Easements and Rights -of -Way. The power to grant and convey to any third parry such licenses, easements, and rights -of -way in, on, or under the Common Areas as may be necessary or appropriate for the orderly maintenance and preservation of the purposes of this Declaration. 5.5 Duties of the Association. In addition to the powers granted to it by its articles of organization and this Declaration, and without limiting the generality thereof, the Association shall conduct all general business affairs of common interest to all Owners including the following: a. Operation and Maintenance of Common Area. Operate, maintain, and otherwise manage or provide for the operation, maintenance, and management of any Common Areas, including the repair and replacement of property worn out, damaged or destroyed by casualty loss. b. Taxes and Assessments. Pay all real and personal property taxes and assessments separately levied against the Common Area owned and managed by the Association or against the Association and/or any property owned by the Association. Such taxes and assessments may be contested or compromised by the Association, provided, however, that such taxes and assessments be paid or a bond insuring payment be posted prior to the sale or disposition of any property to satisfy the payment of such taxes or assessments. In addition, the Association shall pay all other taxes, whether DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 9 federal, state, or local, including income or corporate taxes levied against the Association in the event that the Association is denied the status of a tax-exempt corporation. C. The Association may, but shall not be required to, obtain policies of insurance from reputable insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Idaho, and to maintain in effect the following types of policies of insurance: (i) Comprehensive public liability insurance insuring the Association, its manager or managers, officers, or other representatives, the Declarant, the individual Owners, and the agents and employees of each of the foregoing, against any liability incident to the ownership and/or use of Common Areas owned or managed by the Association. (ii) Such other insurance, including Worker's Compensation Insurance to the extent necessary to comply with all applicable laws, directors and officers liability insurance, and such indemnity, faithful performance, fidelity, and other bonds as the Association shall deem necessary to carry out the Association's functions. (iii) Insurance premiums for the above insurance coverage shall be deemed a common expense to be included in the annual assessments levied by the Association. d. Pressurized Irrigation System. Provide for the use of Common Area use of this system in concert with the Service Provider. 5.6 Personal Liability. No Member of the Association, nor the Association's manager or managers, officers or representatives, nor the Declarant, shall be personally liable to any Owner or to any other party, including the Association, for any damage, loss, or prejudice suffered or claimed on account of any act, omission, error, or negligence of the Association, its managers or representatives, or the Declarant, provided such person has, upon the basis of such information as may be possessed by him, acted in good faith without willful or intentional misconduct. 5.7 Dissolution. In the event the Association is dissolved, the assets of the Association shall be dedicated to a public body or conveyed to another non-profit organization with similar purposes. ARTICLE SIX Covenant for Assessments 6.1 Creation of Lien and Personal Obligation for Assessments. The Declarant hereby covenants with each lot Owner within the property that by acceptance of a deed from Declarant, and whether or not it is expressly stated in said deed, that each lot Owner shall agree to pay to the Association, the following: DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page io a. All regular assessments for specified services and maintenance as set forth in 6.3; and in 6.4. b. All special assessments for specified services and maintenance as set forth Each assessment, together with interest accrued thereon shall be a charge on the lot Owner's lot and shall create a continuing lien upon the Owner's lot against which each assessment is made from and after the date the assessment is due. Each assessment shall bear interest at the rate of thirteen (13%) per cent annum to accrue after the due date until fully paid. Additionally, each assessment and accrued interest shall be the personal obligation of the Owner of the lot assessed at the date of assessment and may be collected by judicial action in the nature of a delinquent open account, which action may be in lieu of or in addition to the foreclosure of the lien created against the Owner's lot. The personal obligation for delinquent assessments shall not pass to an Owner's successor in title unless expressly assumed by the successor. Any collection action, whether it be by lien foreclosure and/or by action on a delinquent account shall require the Owner of the lot assessed to also pay reasonable attorney fees and court costs to be included as a part of the debt to the Association. Prior to bringing an action to foreclose the continuing assessment lien granted by this Article, the Association shall cause a notice of lien claim to be prepared and filed of record with the Ada County Recorder's office and shall send a copy by certified mail to the delinquent lot Owner. The cost of preparing, filing and mailing this claim of lien, including a reasonable attorney fee incurred by the Association, shall also be the cost of the delinquent lot Owner and shall be recovered from the lot Owner. 6.2 Initial Assessment. Each lot sold by Declarant shall be subject to a one-time initial assessment of $ , which shall be paid to Declarant at the closing of the first sale by Declarant to Owner. 6.3 Regular Periodic Assessments. Each lot Owner shall also be assessed and pay a regular periodic assessment to begin to accrue from the date a certificate of occupancy is issued, but prorated for the percentage of the first year. These regular periodic assessments are to be used by the Association for the purpose of maintenance th e e Common Areas, paying costs incurred for policies of insurance purchased by the Association, and/or providing for any other regular business activities of the Association. The Association may elect to collect these periodic assessments on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis, as it deems appropriate. The beginning assessment annualized for the year 2004 shall be $_, based upon an estimate made by the Declarant for the cost of services anticipated. This periodic assessment can be automatically increased by the Association by as much as 20% per year beginning with the year commencing January 1, 2005. It may be increased by more than 20% by a majority vote of the Members at a meeting called for that purpose by the Association. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 11 6.4 Special Assessment for Repairs, Operations, or Maintenance. In addition to the regular periodic assessments, the Association, by the majority vote of its members at a meeting called for that purpose, may make any special assessment for a specific one- time cost or expense benefiting the Common Areas or for some common interest or purpose benefiting all Members. 6.5 Notice of Action under Section 6 3 and 64 Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Section 6.3 and/or 6.4 of this Declaration shall be sent to all Members not more than fifty (5o) days nor less than ten (1o) days in advance of the meeting. 6.6 Miscellaneous Assessment Information. The Association shall annually re- establish the amount of the regular periodic assessment per lot each November of each year (beginning in 2003) and shall send written notice of that re -assessment to each Owner thirty (3o) days before the effective date of the re-established regular periodic assessment. The Association shall, upon request and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by the manager or officers of the Association stating whether or not assessments by the requesting Owner are current. 6.7 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments and Remedies of the Association. Any assessment not paid within thirty (3o) days after the due date shall be deemed to be delinquent and shall bear interest from the due date at the rate of thirteen (13%) per cent per annum. The Association may bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the delinquent assessment or may record and foreclose a lien against the property. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his lot. 6.8 Subordination of Assessment Liens to Mort a es. The lien of any unpaid assessment shall be subordinate to any first mortgage or deed of trust against a lot. No mortgagee of a mortgage or beneficiary of a deed of trust shall be required to collect any unpaid assessment. The failure of a lot Owner to pay assessments shall not constitute a default under a mortgage or deed of trust. Sale or transfer of a lot shall not affect the assessment lien, nor shall the transferee in such sale or transfer be relieved from liability for any assessment thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. ARTICLE SEVEN Pressurized Irrigation System 7.1 Pressurized Irrigation System and Assessments. Each Owner understands that the Declarant has installed or intends to install —a pressurized irrigation system throughout the Subdivision to be able to deliver irrigation water service to each lot in the Subdivision from irrigation water rights appurtenant to the Subdivision, which DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 12 irrigation water is delivered to a site within the subdivision by Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, hereinafter "Water District." Declarant may enter into an agreement with the Water District, pursuant to I.C. § 43-44oA, et seq, whereby the Water District will own and operate the system and each lot Owner will receive a direct assessment from the Water District for a pro-rata cost of the service whether or not the water is actually used. In such case, the Water District would also be the "Service Provider" of the irrigation water to the end lot owners/users. Alternatively, Declarant may enter into an agreement with a third parry other than the Water District (including an entity in which Declarant or principals of the Declarant will hold an interest) who would then act as the Service Provider of irrigation water from the pressurized water system to each lot in the subdivision and charge each lot Owner with a pro-rata lot charge assessment whether or not water is actually used. Irrespective of whether the pressurized irrigation water is provided by the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, or by another Service Provider, the Service Provider shall also operate, maintain and repair the pressurized system and may also levy and collect annual assessments against each lot served by the system to defray the cost and expense of such operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement as is specified in the agreement, which may include a reasonable profit margin for such service. When a final contract has been reached with a Service Provider, it shall be written and recorded in the records of Ada County, Idaho, and shall become a part of this Declaration by reference as if it had been recorded as a part of this Declaration. 7.2 Prohibitions. Lot Owners are prohibited from making any cross connection or tie in between the irrigation water system and their domestic water system. WATER FROM THE IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEM IS NOT DRINKABLE; EACH LOT OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT IRRIGATION WATER WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF HIS/HER/THEIR LOT IS NOT CONSUMED BY ANY PERSON OR USED FOR CULINARY PURPOSES. Lot Owners shall not construct any ditch, drain, well or water system upon any lot or Common Area. 7.3 Use and Rules. The Association, unless otherwise established by Water District, or by another Service Provider, may establish and serve on each lot Owner a set of rules establishing the use of this may water including time of use and duration, recognizing that the system will not permit all lots to use the irrigation water simultaneously. The Association may also elect or contract for hire a water master to designate a rotation schedule. The Owner agrees to follow these rules and the schedules set by a water master. ARTICLE EIGHT Architectural Control DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 13 In order to protect the quality and value of the commercial buildings to be constructed and for the continued protection of the Owners thereof, an Architectural Control Committee (McNelis ACC) is hereby established consistent with the requirements of this Declaration. 8.1 Approvals Required. No building, outbuilding, parking or landscaping of any type shall be commenced, erected, or installed upon any lot until the plans and specifications showing the nature, kind, shape, configuration, height, materials, location of the same and such other detail as the McNelis ACC may require have been submitted to and approved in writing by the McNelis ACC. The McNelis ACC may consider such subjective criteria including compatibility with surrounding structures. 8.2 Enforcement. The McNelis ACC may exercise all available legal and equitable remedies available to prevent or remove any unauthorized or unapproved construction or improvements on any lot or property or any portion thereof Alternatively, McNelis ACC may direct the Association to remove any unauthorized or unapproved improvement on a Lot or property. In the event the McNelis ACC (or the Association, if directed) exercises its right to remove or restrain the violation of any unapproved construction, McNelis ACC shall recover its damages and reasonable attorney fees. 8.3 Waivers. The approval of any plans, drawings, or specifications for any plans, improvements, or construction, or for any matter requiring the approval of the McNelis ACC shall not be deemed a waiver of any right to withhold approval of any similar plan, drawing, specifications, or matter subsequently submitted for approval. 8.4 Liabili . Neither the McNelis ACC nor any member thereof shall be liable to the Association, to any Owner, or to any other party for any damage suffered or claimed on account of any act, action, or lack thereof, or conduct of the McNelis ACC or the respective members thereof, acted in good faith on the basis of information they then possessed. ARTICLE NINE General Provisions 9.1 Enforcement. The Declarant or any Owner shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. Failure by the Declarant or any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 9.2 Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any other provision hereof, and all other provisions of this Declaration shall remain in full force and effect. 9.3 Term. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land for a term of twenty (20) years from the date this Declaration is filed of record. DECLARATION OF COVENANT'S, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 14 After completion of the initial term of twenty (20) years, this Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless appropriate action is taken to rescind or amend the Declaration. 9.4 Amendment. This Declaration may be amended only with the written approval of six (6) Lot Owners, not including the Owner of Common Areas Lot. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Declarant has executed this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions this day of January, 2004. FALCON CREEK, LLC L- STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) A. Leon Blaser Managing Member On this day of , 2004, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared A. on Blaser, Managing Member of Falcon Creek, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Corporation, known to me to be the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument for and on behalf of said limited liability partnership, and acknowledged to me that said limited liability partnership executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at DECLARATION OF COVENANT'S, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 15 Commission Expires: DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR McNELIS SUBDIVISION — Page 16