HomeMy WebLinkAboutFax from Stone Ridge Homes
~1!1~!2~~6 19:33
TO:
FROM:
=== COVER PAGE ===
FAX: 8884218
STONE RIDGE HOMES
RECEIVED
JAN 1 0 2006
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICF
FAX: 2088848207
TEL: 2088848207
COMMENT:
JAN 10 '06 19:04
2088848207
PAGE. 01
~1/1~/2~~6 19:33
2~88848207
STONE RIDGE HOMES
PAGE ~1
rage 1 01 ¿
January 10, 2008
Deer City Council, City of Meridian,
In refenmce to the 8Cheduled January 17, 2006 Notice of He.ring for the ComprehenBlv8 PI.n Amendment for the
North Mertdlan area, pl... accept thl8 written consideration for our 39 acra + or -. Thi8 property touch..
McDermott Ad and exten. EDt tð PeregrlI'I8 Heights Subdlviaion, ne. the corner of Chlnd8n. (PI88M .... the
attached map)
The map outlines 39 acres, of which 30 + ectal are owned by Berbera Wøterfield. The remaining 6.33 Acres as Waterfield
Subdivision (Approved for construdion but not recorded) Is owned by DJJ L.L.C. (Ed Jenkins, Bill Jenkins & Ed DeCouto).
Thank you for the opportunity to voice our opinion on the Comprehensive plan amendment (CPA 05-004).
Approximately 2 yen ago we started a process to develop Waterfield Subdivision. \M1øn we reœived our final approval in
2005 to proceed with our construction meeting we lOon had a new Comprehensive plan to deal with and questions on how to
proceed. At. a matter of fact we war. told that we would probably not be allowed to proceed. Attached is also our DJJ L. L. C.
lettsr dated October 19, 2005 to planning Bnd Zoning,
In rasped of your time and consideration, we would like to recap and make the following points:
1. Although we have been diligent in pursuing 'Waterfield Sub" The Comprehensive Plan Amendment has caused greet strain
and concern 815 to how. when or even if we can proceed,
2. We understand that the homeowners of Peregrine Heights Sub do not want their :toning changed to mix use, but to remain
"Residential",
3. Besides requesting Peregrina Heights Sub zoning to be changed from the master plan, they are also requesting that
approximately 112 the distance of our property from their Western property boundary to McDermott road also be changed.
4. The buffer zone that P9"'9rine Heights Sub is requesting is greater in width than their own subdivision! This 18 øxœsslve
and without thought and consideration for the property owners West of their property,
5. If Peregrine Heights Home Owners Aslocietíon is granted III change from the original "Mixed Use - Interchange" deaígnøtion,
then a raasonable buffer on our property of no more than 250 Ft would be ecœptable to us. At this point, changing of
the zoning of the 250 ft atrip to either "Medium" or "High Density" Residential would be acceptmble to us.
6. It is unreasonable for Peregrine Heights HOA to requUlt that the 8.33 Acres of Waterfield Subdivision be split into 2 different
zoning classifications.
In closing, we would recommend that if the comprehensive plan is adopted, leave the whole 39 acres as "Mixed Use-
Intarchange". If Peregrine Heights is granted "Residential" zoning, then we are in agreement with a 250 Ft buffer zoned
"Medium" or "High Density" Residential on our property. This 250 ft buff&r would line up approximately 1/2 way between the
end of the cui de sac for VVaterfield Sub and the w88tem border of Peregrine Heights Sub.
If their are any questions, I (Ed Jenkins) can be reached any time at (208) 859-3990.
Respectfully,
Ed Jenkins Jr.
WOllam Jenkin.
Ed DeCouto
Barbara Waterfield
2584 N. Bullock Ave
Meridian, Id 83642
For your Ruference pi.... note:
On October 19, 2(106 we sent a letter to Mertdlan Planning and Zoning regarding theM I..u...
(This letter al80 faxed to: City elerka offIC4t '208 - 888-4218)
JAN 10 '06 19:05
Tuesday, January 10.2006 America Online: StoneRidge íd
2088848207
PAGE. 02
01/1B/2~B6 19:33
2B888482~7
STONE RIDGE HOMES
PAGE B2
a
ì t)
I
r
I
æ;'11 !MII nil un ; I III
I; IliI ¡I: 1,IIf III D I I e
ß... S u;u "'I I
'I:i~ Þ," I. 11111" I" Ii }
"tll II ä Þ I -II JI
PI II I I. \- ,.1
R .; " I II 51:' ,.t"
. I .a" ,'\¡,
, .. .{J.
.-------+- -
......
iHr
.1.
III
t J
g ¡-----,~
" ~
---- ~--~Jj
\
~
J
\
..
--
i ¡ r:r
$1"'.'" I !:
'11'-"81'1
III\~~!¡
11111ilHI . -\ t.
Ii II
. I
II
n!~;lí
"'II .
¡~II;ill ,
Bill I
I!dll'
JII"~
I ."
~ ,I. I!!
W I;~III
j. ~
'8
I.
.
81110
JAN 10 '06 19:05
w~mŒ!r!.PJ'WfJ&s~"'~I',~ .. ...
.-.. --=li,.alO.----
PRELIMINARY PL.A. T
/'~:~;::";;'
I:' ~~~t I
r- -.-.
2088848207
PAGE. 03
01/10/2006 19:33
2088848207
STONE RIDGE HOMES
PAGE 03
'-
.
.
DJJ, L.L.C.
Ed JIIDk:ÏD& Jr.
W"ùIi&œ ]CI!IkiÐs
Ed )Jd:;0UI.0
2:t&4 N. Bu11ook AWl
MøriI:\:iII:D, Id 83642
(208) 859-3990
October 19, 2005
.
Th
I em wriring in regard to tho property ~ own approxin:uØely 1 blode South of Cbindeo. on
McDermott Rd. Please see the aDachcd map, Exbibit 4, which depic:b the 8.33 Acres we
own, described IS Waterfield Plaœ Subdivision amd Shady Meadows Drive.
The best ~ to '(JR&£I!t our cooœras far plMMiqg æd ZØIÌDg ~ our }ø.o.pertj is 10 first list a
simp1e ouffiœ of eveuts that .. us to where we me today. F'nm dIis point we can fben pn:seot our
isøues.
1. September 2003, Barbara Waterfield begøn cfiscusaiDg the possible developmCDt of her
approximately 39 acres off of Md>ennott rei wi1h Ada County plannil18 & Z0ß.ÏD8. I
was pan of those discussions. A cluster subdivision of 6 - 1 Acre lots was the result of
the meetings and the procca was started.
2. The next approximately 1 ~ years Barbara Wøterfield sought approval for her
subdivilÓOU.
3. After the required public meotings and approval process thru ADA County, initial
approval was givun.
4. In April200S, Barbara Wararfield sold 8.33 Acres to DJJ L.L.C. for personal reasons.
S. With fiDal approval. of ADA County Highway District requin;ments., final approval to
have pro-coDSb'UCtion meetings. was giVCD on July 19,2005.
6. On September 20, 200S Barbara Waterfield infonned me of a çompreheosive plan
meating for the North Meridian area. 1 picked up a set of documents and maps fOl" the
September 22,2005 meeång which I attended.
7. Between the September 22, 200S meetiu& and the October 17, 200S meeting at Meridian
City Hall. 1 met wi.tb Brad HawkiJls..CIadc: from PIBlUling aød ZODÎDg.
8. 1 attended the October 17, 2005 meetiDg at Meridian City Hall at wbích no opportunity
for commCDt was available to conoaned parties. There were several discrepaDd.es and
changes from the earlier meeting. wlùch I had no knowledge or notification of.
9. I met with Brad Hawkius..clatk at Meridiaa pl~mng ad Zoning to discuss my concems
of the change from Mix use to Residential wi1hout any notice or comment from the
adulland owners bc1Dø affected.
P8ge 1 on
JAN 10 '06 19:06
2088848207
PAGE. 04
~1/1~/2~~6 19:33
2~88848207
STONE RIDGE HOMES
PAGE 04
- '
.
October 19. 20()j
COlDDleD8B on the Seplmlber :1, ZOOS Meetlua
Although we appreciate the long range pJaø.aiDg for the Nonh Meridilll area, .it is díffiçult
for us to understand how tho planned and approved plat for Waterfield Subdivision is not
evoo. shown on 1he map. Meridian pt-i. and Zoning bas signed off on this project as it is
in the Meridi8ß Area of Impact. Aftor this meetins and review of the written material we
have gatbucd, it appears that we may or may not be able to ptoceed with our su.bdivíaion.
After following the rules for 2 years to get to this point, we don't know ifwe can proceed
ad no one øeems to be able to tell us if we can proceod. kwse we have au. 18 month
Purchase aød Development loan that expires ÌD one year, We feel that we have been
adversely affected.
Comm_es OD the October 1 '7, ZOOS Nodee of Special MeedaJ P.......,A Zcmia¡
C........
Before we can undmtand axact1y where we staød from the Sept 22, 2005 Comprehensive
PJID Amendment, I AtftotDdcd tho October 17.2005 meeting only to find out no questions or
comments will be taken at this meeting. Another change fi"om the plan map that bad
indicated our propeny was to be "Mixed Use Interchange" is discussed between Brsd
Haw.ldna-Clark ofPJanni"8 & ZooiDg and the 3 commissioncr5. The result oftbis t414Ç1u1.Qìon
was unclear. The minutes of that meeting may help elarify.
I believe Brad said that he teCOIDIIleDded tbat the commkc:iGn approve the change in use
&0111 "Mixed Use Interchange" to "ResideatiaJ.. Just as tbe letter dated October 14,2005
&om Peregrine HOA had outlined. I believe Brad HawIåns-C1ark also stated that the
residential decÏgJlHrion would extend all tbc way to McDermott.
These two statements are in QOßt1ìct.
Other Pu:iDta:
1. I don't believe all the land owners affected by dús new change have either beeD
infonned or contacted, just 85 we bad not.
2. Residential right up to au interchange is poor plAnning- Transitions are needed.
3. There arc at least 2 inCOD'ect issues ill tho 1-- tram ParogrinCl HOA letter daIed
October 14, 200S, and the commissioners have made a decision based on this Idler.
4. Althoush the pJaoning examples for Las Vegas NY Are shown in the October 14,2005
Jetter, I don't believe WI should plan like Las Vega&.
S. I am sympathetic to the good folks at who live in Peregrine Heights Subdivision and
believe they should have 5OJDf buffer or tnms;t)OD to protect their in.te.rcst. The pcob1ero
is that you should not change the designation 1/2 way to McDermott without input from
the landmwurs _bo are diroctly and Adverøely sffcx:ted.
Paee 2 or 3
JAN 10 '06 19:06
2088848207
PAGE. 05
~1/10/2~0ó 19:33
2~888482fJ7
STONE RIDGE HOMES
PAGE 05
.;.
October 19, 2003
6. The line drawn by the letter ofOCtObcr 14,200' Û'OD1 Peregrine Heisbts HOA splits
Barbara Waterfield's propa1y in balfBDd the - Þ:tends through part of lots Sand 7 of
Wa&erfield ~ SubdivisiOIL This makes no SGDSe.
7. Altbougb Barbara Waterfield signed the October 14, 2005 Peregrine heights HOA Letter
she is in dispute of the final map that wu submitted to tho c.mnrnksion on her bebøl£ and
she bas varba1ìzed this issue to BI1Id HawJåDs.C1ark on OCtOber 18, 2ooS in a phone
coovCDlliÍOD. Barbara Watufield 111!111111 ~ .. dutt the ...Id- tial bonier should
be DO more dum 250 feet .. we have tpf.." In 81'111e11 oa n:hibit 4.
Condulion
On October 18, 2005 1 met with Brad Hawkin&-Cl8lk at Meridiaa PIamù:n8 &. Zoning to
discus8 some oftbose issues, especially the c:baDges of the October 11,2005 meet:il\g. I also
W8ßt to 11Ote that I did receive a copy oftbe Parepine Hoì.ghts HOA letter datrJd October 14.
2005 bur not until the October ¡-¡Ill meeting was over.
The IßI9Itn we received fiom Brad HawJdos..C1ark were 1II1c1oar as he staled he would have
to see if there was a conflict in his statements. He aJso said that the "Preferred Bøcbge
Road- that is shown ~ dttu Peregdne Heights would now be shortmod, alfbougb.
this was DeYa' discussed at the (kl.Ober I jtb meeting at Meridian city Hall.
As anyone can ten by readíDg this we bavo a wry confil!1Î11g situation. Weare requosting
that our deiiÐ'Øion remain "Mixed Use Intercbao80" at this time. The adverse effects on
our approved devalopmCIIII are substaotial and we would app' ..waŒ aoy clear 8D5Wer'S you
can provide. AJso please advise us of lIlY ~ new maps, natiœ of mec:tiDp thaI
affec:t our property.
Respectfu1Jy,
Ed Joakins Jr.
William JenIåDs
Member DJJ. L.L.C.
Edward DeCouto
MIIII8giDg Member
D1J, L.L.C
Member DJJ, L.L.C
Pa". ;3 of 3
JAN 10 '06 19:07
2088848207
PAGE. 06