Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Clerk ChecklistCITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: Medina Subdivision Contact Name: Jason Densmer/ Van Elg Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: ❑X Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑X Notice to newspaper with publish dates: File No. PP 07-003 Phone: 939-4041 January 16, 2007 Hearing Date: February 15, 2007 January 17, 2007 29-Jan-07 and 12-Feb-07 ❑ Certifieds to property owners: ❑ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:MW Approve ❑ Deny Notes: City Council Level: ❑ Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: ❑ Certifieds to property owners: ❑ City Council Action: Hearing Date: 3-� a - and 3—/a No -�rce s a —13 - o ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: Findings / Conclusions / Order: Rselud°ns ❑ Approved by Council: C'pinel Ras/Copy C- Minutebook CopyRa ,CopyCm,. City Enpineer Qy Planner Copies Disbursed: Ciy Al, Ste lnp Codfiers Pro)e Rd. Findings Recorded DapUy Clerk Copy Res/Ctlpinal C., Ada County (CPAs) Development Agreement: Appl-M (non -CPAs) R.cerded Ordnances Cllpmal MlnWeb°ok ❑ Sent for signatures: Copiesto Ciy Clerk Sbte Tae Comm, Slate Treasuer, Audtor. A—, ❑ Signed by all parties: CISterling l—.y NEng—or CiN npineer ❑ Approved by Council: Ciy Renner Pree<tk� AppGoant(irappl.) ❑ Recorded: Depuy aenc Fl Drd m Wdngs/ pi nal. Minutebook ❑ Copies Disbursed: Copi esto. Applicant R/E,,gm'a Cly Enpineer Ciy Renner Ordinance No. Resolution No. °'" Deputy CIeM l`/C17 " Rec°rd Vackd°n Flndnlp ❑ Approved by Council: R"°'d,d g-lF-p-f„.em."�: Onpinal.Fireproor File Copies b APPNcan ❑r Recorded: Deadline: 10 days t ro(ecM1le CiPyEnpm— ❑ Published in Ciy Planner C'"""°'"y newspaper: Depuy cmn< ❑ Copies Disbursed: Notes: /4 CITY OF Y1�1GE-n� TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON IDAHO YY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN .G /d TItE.gSURE" To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by 1903 `i Vr.�Y the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your 903 MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Joseph W. Borton Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS City Attorney/HR 703 Main Street 898-5506 (City Attorney) 898-5503 (HR) Fax 884-8723 Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234 / fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579/fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533/fax 888-6854 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678/fax 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500/fax 898-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211/fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191/fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242 / fax 884-1159 comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: February 8, 2007 Transmittal Date: January 17, 2007 File No.: PP 07-003 Hearing Date: February 15, 2007 Request: Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat approval of 6 commercial building lots on 8.06 acres in a C-G zone for Medina Subdivision By: Ken Lenz Location of Property or Project: West Overland Road SWC of South Meridian Road and Steve Siddoway (no FP) David Moe (no FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay (No FP) Michael Rohm (No FP) Keith Borup (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Charlie Rountree, C/C Joe Borton, C/C Keith Bird, C/C David Zaremba, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Services(No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department / Rich Greene Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department Economic Development (CUP only) Your Concise Rgmarks: Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office(FP/PPonly) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrig. District Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,cUP) Qwest (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP) Ada County Ass. Land Records Meridian Development Corp. Historical Preservation Comm. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK- FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING- FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE -FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper Planning Department COMMISSION & COUNCIL REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Annexation and Zoning ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification ❑ Final Plat ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ Planned Unit Development fib Preliminary Plat ❑ Rezone ❑ Time Extension (Commission or Council) ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Vacation (Council) ❑ Variance Other Development Agreement Modification STAFF USE ONLY: File number(s): fP ,01-003 M i-0-1 -COL Projectname: ME&&L 506d,'Vi51'a-n Date filed: Date complete`. 1 ` 15 -0-1 Assigned Planner: Related files: A ?_--o4-o7m ; VAIS-05- t 1 Hearing date: " i `i ..0 13 Commission ❑ Council Applicant Information Applicant name: Ken Lenz Phone: 345-1842 Applicant address: 416 S. 8th Street, Suite 200, Boise, ID Applicant's interest in property: [EOwn E]Rent E]Optioned ❑ Other Owner name: White -Leasure Development Company Owner address: 416 S. 8th Street, Suite 200, Boise, ID Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): Firm name: The Land Group, Inc. Address: 462 E. Shore Dr, Suite 100, Eagle, ID Primary contact is: E] Applicant n Owner l Agent [:] Other Contact name: Van Elg E-mail: van@thelandgroupinc.com Zip: 83702 Phone: 345-1842 Zip: 83702 Jason Densmer/Van Elg Subject Property Information Location/street address: Southwest Corner of S. Meridian & W. Overland Road Assessor's parcel number(s): Township, range, section: Parcel # S1224110105 T3N, R1 W, Section 24 Current land use: Vacant Field & Abandoned Gas Stn. Total acreage: Phone: 939-4041 Zip: 83616 Phone: 939-4041 Fax: 939-4445 8.06 Acres Current zoning district: C-G 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 Project Description Project/subdivision name: Median Subdivision General description of proposed project/request: Proposed zoning district(s): C-G Six Lot Commericial Sub w/ associated paving & Utils Acres of each zone proposed: 8.06 Acres of C-G zoning Type of use proposed (check all that apply): El Residential El Commercial El Office El Industrial D Other Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): Landscaping Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? Medina Sub. Owner Assoc. Which irrigation district does this property lie within? Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Primary irrigation source: City of Meridian Secondary: N/A City of Meridian Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated if rims or second pointof connection is City water): 88,026 SF q g P g C primary �>"' ri )• Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: Number of building lots: Number of common and/or other lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 Bedroom: 2 or more Bedrooms: Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): Minimum property size (s.f): Proposed building height: _ Average property size (s.£): Gross density (Du/acre-total land): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Percentage of open space provided: Acreage of open space: Percentage of useable open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelling(s) proposed: []Single-family E]Townhomes ® Duplexes 0 Multi -family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: 6 Other lots: 0 Gross floor area proposed: 50,920 SF Existing (if applicable): N/A Hours of operation (days and hours): 7 days/24 hours Building height: <65 ft Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: 25% Building: 14.5% Paving: 60.5% Total number of employees: Unknown Maximum number of employees at any one time: Unknown Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): N/A Seating capacity: N/A Total number of parking spaces provided: 282 Number of compact spaces provided: 0 Authorization Print applicant name: Applicant signature: Date: t E. Wa cr Lane, uite 202 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208y88:5533 Facsiibile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 w% ice-!% �i iW AZ THE LAND GROUP, INC. December 15, 2006 City of Meridian Planning Department RE: Narrative describing Medina Subdivision project and DA modification (#105134293) I am writing to describe the proposed project shown on the preliminary plat for Median Subdivision. The preliminary plat proposes six commercial lots with associated landscape and parking areas at the south west corner of W. Overland Road and S. Meridian Road. Sewer service would be provided by the City of Meridian via the existing 18 inch sewer main on the west side of S. Meridian Road. Water service would be provided by the City of Meridian via the existing 12 inch mains on the north side of W. Overland Road and on the east side of S. Meridian Road. Pressure irrigation service would be provided by the City of Meridian via connection to the existing water mains as well, with approved back flow prevention. The proposed retail and office uses fit within the current C-G zoning. The project would be anchored by a Walgreens shown on Lot 1 Block 1. The current owner/developer is requesting Modification of the originally recorded Development Agreement (which remains applicable to the new owner/developer). Requested Modification(s) are as follows: 1. A modification for the curb cut on Meridian Road is needed to change the language on the second page of Exhibit B to the Development Agreement where it says "In compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan no curb cuts shall be allowed on Kuna-Meridian Road (SH 69)". The right -in/ right - out curb cut on Meridian Road was approved by VAR-05-027 and is to be located no closer than 500 feet from the centerline of Overland Road. Centerline is a critical word here. Otherwise the Development Agreement Lanctrcape Architecture • Site Planning •Civil Engineering •Golf Course Irrigation Engineering •Graphic Communication 462 E. Shore Drive, Ste. 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 • P 208.939.4041 F 208.939.4445 9 www.thelandgroupinc.com I\ 00F "_�W. ". THE LAND GROUP, INC. does not address the curb cuts on Overland Road it only refers to future applications and ACHD requirements for Overland Road. Recently ACHD has drawn new plans moving our full service access to the west as proposed by Lowe's. ACHD requested if this was acceptable to the applicant and Walgreen's has approved this new location. The original full service curb cut was approved through the conditional -use process (CUP 06-015) and can be found under Exhibit B section 9.4 of the conditions of approval. 2. A modification of the requirement for cross access, through the middle of our property (providing access to the property to the west), was in the conditions of approval for Walgreens. This condition must be modified to reflect the new access locations/drives as shown on the plat that we are now submitting. The owner is not requesting any variances at this time. Feel free to contact me need with questions or if you need more information. Sincerely, zl�� Zach Kirk The Land Group, Inc. CC: Van Elg Ir Landscape Architecture • Site Planning • Civil Engineering * Golf Cour e Irrigation dr Engineering # Graphic Communication 462 E. Shore Drive, Ste. 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 • P 208.939.4041 F 208.939.4445 9 www.thelandgroupinc.com N //e'�i - � i0 ''� THE LAND GROUP, INC. January 12, 2007 City of Meridian Planning Department RE: Addendum to the Medina Subdivision Narrative As discussed with Sonya, ACHD has provided us with a cut sheet print of their plans along Overland Road —as they relate to Medina sub and some surrounding/proposed development. These plans were obtained from Jeremy at ACHD Design. Note that The KUHL property (to the west of our site) will grant a mutual ingress egress cross access easement as now shown on the preliminary plat (see NW corner of the plat). In addition, an access on the north side of Overland now serves the water park. The water park easement is shown on our preliminary plat as it exists today; however, as can be seen in the ACHD plans (attached), this access will be closed and made to more closely align with this new cross access easement at our NW corner. Note that we also show another access to Overland road near the middle of our site. As shown, this access will be restricted to a Right-In/Right-Out. This access is also shown on the ACHD plans. Finally, as a part of a previous Development Agreement, a cross access was required through this site, from Meridian Road, to provide access to the property on our western boundary. This access is no longer appropriate or necessary and the access at the NW corner is acceptable. As requested by staff, we have submitted the appropriate documentation to modify the original Development Agreement. This should help clarify the status of the access points and easements. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Van Elg, Senior Planner The Land Group, Inc. or Landscape Architecture • Site Planning • Civil Engineering • Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering • Graphic Communication 462 E. Shore Drive, Ste. 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 • P 208.939.4041 F 208.939.4445 9 www.thelandgroupinc.com Y W W m U W. KINGSALMON LANE W. OVERLAND ROAD PROJECT AREA 0 Q O o W. DAVENPORT ROAD Q 0 0 O N vi r,A Mi 19 Z Q 0 W m ni \ IC II\I I l \l MIIAMW INTERSTATE 84 I M W N SITUA TED IN A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4, SEC. 24, T. 3N., R. 1 W., B. M. CITY OF MERIDIAN* ADA COUNTY, /DAHO Zomng/Vicinity Map SCALE 1 : 5,425 200 0 200 400 600 FEET 13 Aerial SCALE 1 : 2,457 200 0 200 400 600 FEET WalgrEi-an Sub Racf-'Ius List SCALE 1 : 4,525 200 0 200 400 600 FEET 1 41z; T N il . ; g 0 1 s < O if s a � 7 3 m a to ra o m m a m 5 $mLe6fl1!, J�j§Ra 2 �jk4d�CL TAi g4a ilf BRl qq789 gY¢25_R$ �€G��m`ay -��� 'off', IZ h Aid t oOyP P"x I 6 �.' ♦ 1pEp MEDINA SUBDIVISION a PRELIMINARY PLAT F o® o ygS a �' �m ! OVERLAND &MERIDIAN ROADS, MERIDIAN IDAHO x�ll m v_ u m m 8 4�r��At �2 O 8 W O a 3 3D _�o$s n 0 m N RUH �JS m�3 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I i mil 1 I I 1 i t 1 I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I]• 11 ��B I 1 y I I I I I I I I I I I LA I I I I I I L---- I I I I I I I jI I I I I I 1I I I I I I , 1 -I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I L I 1 1 i I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I i 1 1 I 1 I I I ! g l I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I , I I (r1 1 1 I 1 I • _r____T______ __r____T__—_,_____rO____1 tr, I I X 1 � 1 I Xw' xv. M�ISaiY.3] 1 I II + I 1 I I rxv. t�R. U,iNI - a • >Li I 1 I I I I 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 sXlu] If xV, i• ai12IXl •,I]I I I I I I I ■� I I I I I I I I 1 I C NV. N• ]e11.9I I I I I I �7 NV. x• aX,ia I y_—__1_____L____g7L____1____Jyg1_.____yyL S � Y g Y XI 73 Y MEDINA SUBDIVISION g �� � o�� T��� PRELIMINARY PLAT g® N �2c�� § �' s - OVERLAND & MERIDIAN ROADS, MERIDIAN IDAHO a [� in AVqM II o0 �z i . DOm v1m t D? � 00� niCZO a�m= 8= --Dm OCG�P ' OO mT C ca s 3 m < m n Z ?? N n=? -. _ -- - - - -- - _ _ _ _. _ . _ _ _ _ i � x ,- _ - - = tee• �� ,�„• - - --��-- emu' _ � „ ��a wseei�G� S MJBDVAN ROAD (SH-BD) � u �a o Qi� p ppp� p n m4Z g l i i o� 0• �W P a 0 Rp�a vF�N gcm N O iti' R O D i am m Z c ; s Z S A I yo _fig i C Fe A �' m HU)N ��CJ Z n H�gY45.. A. m mWpe z Z c {30 (A -7 M n O A v 0 C z 0 MERIDIAN Ok rl WIN 11 Overland Retail Center REVISIONS H2� co 6 m w. er wrc oacxmox g e In c N Approach Plan 3 � y O Y N z m ^ N A Ca g� �L 3a Y 3 YicY cY O D Z m C 31i 67a R€ E 888 6S€€a (m') z ' 1 z Co z P ! ! , o z w r n � g� o � Z . " ` m IT m� 0 0 �1 1, 8. 111,11 11 5!5 m 1! � OCIII � a�fk: 0 a l�g�el��ll3i! z itg:! $;! Ei}r n i �i }.tip: D m mi�l�rF jlil}�;Ir3 -. ii'q z ti HIM =a► i �� z Z � z 1 0o t3 = �`6 MEDINA SUBDIVISION Landscape Plan �I3g ;iri!g9g 4 Meridian, Idaho `�� �,;' � 'mmm�a0,c U � I I I I I I i i I I � I j +€ i I I —-------- -- la Oo9Z1 I la 000bt --- r eauu fi 4alay i la aasr I ' F i t i I _ I Dad I I OS SL ]L any Ilj z wa i i j I --- — ,, - - ___ ___ ___ __----- __ ___ ___ ___ ram___ ___._ __ __- __._�___ 1 I I I h 44 I I I I' ,I I MEDINA SUBDIVISION �5� - orllllll,° Nat Landscape Plan B I 1 i s€z i Q Meridian, Idaho 9� '4�rrr ' rlrr`P 9999 llllll j - � WwA_Ag �d at?r � 'c °p. ,T qIrlomwagdmaT s �,,� r�� `F .lam F i��� ;�. Hearing Date: February 15, 2007 File No.: PP-07-003 Project Name: Medina Subdivision Request: Request for preliminary plat approval of 6 commercial building lots on 8.06 acres in a C-G zone. Location: SWC of S. Meridian Road & W. Overland Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 24, T.3N., R. l W. File No.: MI-07-002 Request: Request for a modification to the recorded Development Agreement (Inst. 105134293) pertaining to access for the site. r JAN 16 2007 City Of M endian City Clerk Office IaUn(, 4r y Legal Description Howell Parcel A parcel located in the NE /4 of the NE Y4 of Section 24, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at Brass Cap Monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 24, from which a Brass Cap Monument marking the southeast corner of the NE % of said Section 24 bears S 0°37'06" W a distance of 2649.91 feet Thence S 0°37'06" W along the easterly boundary of said NE % of the NE l a distance of 753.55 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly boundary N 89"47'00" W a distance of 65.00 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin on the westerly right-of-way of State Highway 69 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89"47'00" W along the northerly; boundary of Elk Run Subdivision as shown in Book 63 of Plats on Page 6303, records of Ada County, Idaho, a distance of 472.10 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence leaving said northerly boundary N 0°37'06" E a distance of 693.85 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin on the southerly right-of-way of Overland Road; Thence S 88"43'38" E along said southerly right-of-way a distance of 12.10 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence leaving said southerlyright-of-way N 0037'06" E a distance of 59.87 feet to a point on the northerly boundary of said` NE'/ of the NE'/; Thence S 89047'20" E along said northerly boundary a distance of 180.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly boundary S 0d12'40" W a distance of 40.00 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin on the southerly right-of-way of Overland Road; Thence S 89047'20" E along said southerly right-of-way a distance of 145.00 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way S 87027'10" E a distance of 127.11 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence a distance of 23.41 feet along the arc of a 25.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of'53°39'36" and a long chord bearing S 60037'22" E a distance of 22.57 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin on the westerly right-of-way of State Highway 69; Thence S 5013'20" E along said westerly right-of-way a distance of 28.39 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence continuing along said westerly right-of-way S 0°37'06" W a distance of 468.95 feet to a brass cap monument marked station 428+57.72, 50' LT; Liir��1:7�1��r» Kuhl/Howell Survey _, �...-'`Lind 5—tytr g and C.mwlHng ,lob No, 06-33 Thence continuing along said westerly right-of-way N 89°22'54" W a distance of 15.00 feet to a brass cap monument marked station 428+57.72, 65' LT; Thence continuing along said westerly right-of-way S 0°37'06" W a distance of 200.26 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 8.06 acres (350,924 square feet) and is subject to any easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS oNPt L Land Solutions, PC Jul 11, 2006 11118 <,2r� OF N p W \A Lilr;i b11.1t10r)S Kuhl/Howell Survey - ' L—d S—r.&g -od C"wiing Job No. 06-33 Howell Marketing Parcel Closure.txt Parcel name: Howell Marketing Parcel North: 700972.2293 Line Course: N 89-47-00 w North: 700974.0145 Line Course: N 00-37-06 E North: 701667.8241 Line Course: S 88-43-38 E North: 701667.5554 Line Course: N 00-37-06 E North: 701727.4219 Line Course: S 89-47-20 E North: 701726.7586 Line Course: S 00-12-40 w North: 701686.7589 Line Course: S 89-47-20 E North: 701686.2246 Line Course: S 87-27-10 E North: 701680.5755 Curve Length: 23.41 Delta: 53-39-36 Chord: 22.57 Course In: S 02-32-50 W RP North: 701655.6002 End North: 701669.5050 Line Course: S 05-13-20 E North: 701641.2328 Line Course: S 00-37-06 W North: 701172.3102 Line Course: N 89-22-54 w North: 701172.4720 Line Course: S 00-37-06 w North: 700972.2237 East 2454420.1446 Length: 472.10 East 2453948.0480 Length: 693.85 East 2453955.5359 Length: 12.10 East 2453967.6329 Length: 59.87 East 2453968.2790 Length: 180.00 East 2454148.2778 Length: 40.00 East 2454148.1304 Length: 145.00 East 2454293.1294 Length: 127.11 East 2454420.1138 Radius: 25.00 Tangent: 12.64 Course: S 60-37-22 E Course out: N 56-12-26 E East 2454419.0027 East 2454439.7791 Length: 28.39 East 2454442.3631 Length: 468.95 East 2454437.3023 Length: 15.00 East 2454422.3032 Length: 200.26 East 2454420.1420 Perimeter: 2466.04 Area: 350,924 sq. ft. 8.06 acres Mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0061 Course: S 24-55-21 w Error North:-0.00557 East :-0.00259 Precision 1: 404,268.85 Page 1 Nov 15 OG 01:08p White -Leasure 208-343-3143 p.2 ADA COUNTY WA R R A eOISE IDA O CBlf 3144 11. AY�ID NAVAAAO dEPtIrY Joanne Hooper .39 )j II tt I I I1 jj WILLIAM OWELL EST OF �1� ��I��I�I��I�I��l�Illl��lllll�Illli I FOR VAI,llF RFCF: VED AMOUNT 3.00 104104041 J0fIN W. KELLY and RUTH E. KELLY, husband and wife the Granu)r s , do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto I� WILLIAM E, HOWE14L and MARY J. HOWELL, husband and wife the Grantee s , whose address in 7204 Brentwood, Boise, Idaho aJ I` the following described premises, to -wit; Beginning at the corner common to sections 13 & 24, T. 3 N,, R. 1 W., and Sections 18 & 19, T. 3 N., R. 1 E_ 8.M., which is a point on the Boise Meridian, which is also the )ZEAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 89°12' West 549.20 feet along the section line to a point; Thence South 753.50 Peet to a point; Thence North 89°12' East 549.20 feet to a point on the Boise Meridian; Thence North 753.50 feet along the Boise Meridian to the Point of Beginning. Containing 9.50 acres, more or less, all. in the NEha NEh, Section 24, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. NJ TO HAVF. AND TO HOLD the snid premises, with their appumenanres unto the said Grantee s ` their heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor S do hereby covenant to and with the said Grantr..v Is , that t he y are the owners in fco simple of said premises; that I said premises are free fmm all encumbrances i and that t he y will warratlt and defend the. same from all lawful claims whacwevcr. Dated: A, • Y' STATE. OF IDA110, COUNTY UF ADA On this / day of j /0ri . 197V before me. a notary pubise In one) for said Stutk, parapnully aDweatud John W. Kelly and Ruth E. Kelly known tome to be the person whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowleditrd to me that -j ,.thy a rcutcd tilt' same. Noia f't4blfc �Yesidlnizat �; �7'+ c.c.....�t',--N. 1 Iduho `#( e{ a `I �— S7'ATF. OF IIiA}10, i:i)uN•rY OF 1 hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record at the request of at minutes past o'clock m., this day of 19 , in my office, and duly recorded in Uook of needs at pane Ex-OPACIo Recorder by F)",,,, ty, — Fees € Mail ta: PIONEER COMPANY OF ADA COUNTY 1 t. W. JOW164 St. Boise, Idaho 63)07 - 2011344.6515 �Reppremonibnp pioneer NN741119nal Title3Inysu�rance `.,�WLLIf[(r.�,W(y�'.IWtilWl'_Ivl'l1IL'lYIL'JY!'lWL.1YY lYUl. �14��Yll.i�iJl7i.11fl.+rl�W'tl��' .1Wlf�llfGllY(L I�JWL]�]�' L!(1��klL_11Yk .�' JVf_SLfI'.1tlUllt/e tWz tn) v� Nov 15 06 01:08p White -Leasure 208-343-3143 p.3 Z' ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO 'AMOUNT . 1119 3 BOISEIDAHD10dZU1D6 0t:55PM 1 iit1 tt ..11 1ii1' !tl1I1I 't1r I !I DEPM 11A DFRECORDED-REQUEST IN lil�l��l���II1iEtIlliil�I�t�llil� RI CUIxbYlvc RicAND' Flrsl Amerlrao 106 i G6584 OFS �'ED BY AND VhiEN RECUW)]iu l tTURN TO, Hnwaid k- Foley F61ey Freeman Borto6 HIC : 77 East Idaho Street, Suite 100 P-0. Box 10 Meridian, Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED. Bruce 'K• Kuhl and .Bonnie.. L,: Kuhl, husband and' wife, end Rosetta. M. Kuhl'- ' an unmarried person' (heri*inafter collectively "Grimtors"} do release atnd' forever quitclaim unto Wrlli= E. HoweII' and Mary J. IJPwell; husband and wi'fe'(hereinafter• "Grantee"}; wliosc address. is 497 'White Cloud, Poise, Idaho 83709, and'tu its successors and assigns; all title and • . interest which Grantors now have or may hereafter, acquire -in ttic following described real property situated in Ada County, state of idabo, more particularly. de icribcd on Exhibit A attached hereto. - To have and to hold, all and singular the said premises, togcthcr with the appurten,.ulces'; -unto Grantee, and to its successorrs[s��and'assigns forever. DA'TE,D this �: dey oflcpher, 2006. Bnice K. Kuhl-.. Bonnie T_Kuhl R set�MKt SIWIJ, Or.-IDA130 } County of Ada On the day a. 200G -before me thu undc.T. ect, a Notary Public iu anti for `"� eat , said State, personally appeared Bxucc K. Kuhl, 'one of tl,e sign z,% of 'die within instrument,. who duly ackhowledged to me the execution of the ,.Mme. Q)UTrCLA IM DEED Page .X Nov 15 06 01:08p White -Leasure 208-343-3143 p.4 ' V IN WITNESS WAEREUF, I have ht�e unto set my hand and affixed my o$'icial .goal theA . and year first above written : . �.. J�Psdy.,,�� W OTARY�ctt�aryPti is f I o . s F►UB1.L G :. ' MY Commissionl Enires'. }'�. $TAIE OF IllAHO • . County of Ada } On the _ `, day of l ) 2006, before nee, the imdersigned, a Notary Public in azad fbr said State,: personally appeared Boiuiic L: Kuhl, pile. of the signers of the within instrument, - who. duly acknowledged t6 me the execution ofthe's.'une: IN WTINBSS WHERI;01', I have hercunto.st t my hind.and afted my ofhcinl seal the day and year first dbove-writtcai. X17 zi OTARY s of ublic daho d esidlDga yPr')r�.�f7•+� P[7ALTC' ` ? My Commission Expires:..(1���y-�''�'f {. �. %QAOF`i"�����\� STATE OI IDAHU • ') �nl�urt ) SS, County of Ada ). On the ��dy of , 2406, before me, tE�c undersigned, a Notary I'ublia ita and for said State, personally appeared Rosotta M. Kuhl; one of the 6ignerti (if the within,•inkixument whip . ' duly aclmowle(it ed.to me the ex=utiolr of the same. . IN WTTNESS WBBRI:t7k, I have hereunto set m.yhand � affixed my official sc� the day : and yew first above written - �. ' - `,��p�tltttuti►ryi� - /y.. •• z �p'TA,RY "No l'ub c fo>. daho . . siding =* = My Commission 'xpires: 4 1//i� FA m�itit QYli1'C LA'CIVI 'UF:k D- F. aKe 2 . . Lvov 15 06 01:08p White -Leasure 208-343-3143 p.5 Le al Descrjpt,On ' Kuhl to Howell Parcel :. A parcel located in;the NE ,4 of the NE :. of Section -24, Township 3 Nbrtli; Range i West, QpiSB Meridian, Ada C ounry, Idaho; .and being the easterly. 12.10 feet of that 'parcel as described in .quficlaim .Deed Instrument No,,.109096329, records of Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as fallows: Commencing .at Brass Cap Monurrient marking the northeast comer of said Section 24; from whioh a 518 inch diameter iron pin'marking the northwest oorner of said NE;'/. of the NE l bears 'N 89047'20" W a distance of. 13D9.29 feet;-'. Thence N 69°47'20" W along the. northerly boundary of said NE Y4 of the NE '/, a distance of 525,00 feet to a'point; Thence leaving said northerly boundary S.0°S7'06" W a distance of.59.87 foot to a 5/8 inch dlorneter iron pin on the southerly, right-of-way of Overton& Road and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way' 5 0"37'06" W a distance of 693.83 feet to a point on. -the northerly boundary of .Elk Run Subdivision as shown. in Bonk 63'of Plats. on. Pa.g a 6303, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence N 89"47'00" W along said northerly boundary a distance of 12,10 feet to a point; 1'hence leaving said northerly boundary N 0037'06" Ea distance of 693.85 feet to n point -on the southerly right -of --way of Dvertand Koad; Thence S 88'43'38„ E along said southerly right-of-way a distance of 12.10 feet to the POINT' OF BEGINNING_ This parcel contains 0.19 acres (8,304 square feet) Arid is subject to any ease mants.existing-or in usb. Clinton 1N, Hensen, PL5 NL LA' Land Solutions, PC `Revised, Qptober 17, 2006 o �� �. 11118. C'Nw. s3t,f:Gl.a�O��Y h a`1� Kuhlll-lowdlS[rrvey Job No. of-33 Affidavit of Legal Interest State of Idaho ) ) ss County of Ada ) William E. Howell Namo Boise atr being first duty sworn upon oath, depose End say: 497 White Cloud Drive Addre3$ ID 83709 State 1. That I am tho record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to Jeff Huber 416 S. 8th Street, Ste. 200. Boise, ID 83702 Ntrrw Accress to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. Meridian 2. 1 agree to indemnify, defend and hold Vb�= City and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this 13th Signature day of Apri 1 Subscribed and sworn to before me the day and year,first apove written. 0012111111111" Notary Public for Idtho U �G ARD ���'Q4 � '• � '��� Residing at: ! !4 t.Q' •: p L VO / x My commission ezplros: 1 lU 4 • •'�i���1`8rST A'',��� Moran T17 11-15-'06 14:17 FROM -The Land Group 2089394445 T-423 P002/002 F-125 AFFIDAVIT` Or LEC'Al, IN'1'E RICST STATE OF IDAIIO ) COUNTY OF ADA j AoD-- (namc) (address) �--- being first July ~worn upi»o S PI—_--_—..., .... oath, depose and say: (city) (state) 1. "That. I am the record owner of the prolierty described on the att,rektuf, and 1 grant. my pertnis iOn ta: (name) (address)?i(da to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. 2. 1 agree to indemnify, derend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless frotrr tiny claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or aN to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this /s/y day of 20. Z> . (Signature) St)HS(.,RI Hh:D AN1) SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. CA S 4:. OTgR 1- s �•. pUB L1C ,F OF ID p. Ni my Public for Idaho Residing at Imy Commission Expires: PRE APPLICATION MEETING NOTES DATE: !t - ZZ: 0 Applicant(s): Tkt lo..,-,d Artsv Engineer/Architect/Planner: jaS- TUPr,i -Me Lane( F,wvp Staff: AMno SbM0. Mt I & Proposed Development: W4_1 reen� Sv6�i,i.viSiar Location: SwC o� 0 Y d d Iv1.e r► Required Applications: PYei;rvjin flat velo r�,eh}- Existing Zoning. C-C-t rGCrrten+ mocl' fi Proposed Zoning,. Comprehensive Plan Designation: C -*.—V e-rUA For Plats _ Property- Size: 8 acnea Number of Units:♦ — Sewer: eX Leh f e: Water: Pressurized Irrigation: Street Buffers: 35" 6-AF w rft. al MeriGli ad_• Z5` atwv%j owerlaxd Open Space & Micropaths: Landscape Plan: Lot Size & Frontage: Topography:. DrainQar Hydrology: Street System: ciri vec., Pathway System:" 101 Other Annlications ❑ Annexation ❑ Rezone ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Application Checklist Review Other Agencies to Additional Pre -application Conference: ✓ Not recommended Recommended Anticipated Submission Date: Dec. 1 SN► Anticipated PIanning & Zoning Date: Mid �br,ra,ry Additional Notes: UDC 11= Required -b cam h ec+ -h� YoR r-1y L- r ted • �- S tie { h, S - 1 I, 6evr�(a MvFI- caw+ply kIAv.fCto �1= wi l� F�vi rye De3��. esv t�sn c�e.vel 2n The information_Provided during this;reeting is based srOon the rAMxt CV ofMeridian oning & Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Corrrehensive Plan and is valid r 3 month Any subsegarerrt changes to the Zoning or Subdivision Ordinance or CoVrehenrive Plan ma• J,aff ctyour alication. 6n ,0-" Ae.ve toP►„,en+ w' i 0 Ar =I' IHE LAND GROUP. I November 7, 2006 Dear Neighbor, You are cordially invited to an informational neighborhood meeting open house format regarding a proposed development in your area. We are the owner's representative/engineer for this project and we will be present at the meeting to present the development concept and to answer questions. PROJECT LOCATION• At the southwest corner of Meridian and Overland-1601 S. Meridian Road (see attached vicinity map) PROTECT DESCRIPTION• Applicant will be subdividing the property into 6 commercial/retail lots. The site is approximately 7.79 acres is size. MEETING DATE & TIME• November 13`h, 2006 at 5:30 to 6:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: At the site... southwest corner of Meridian and Overland. 1601 S. Meridian Road. The meeting will likely be held outside. Gt�r,Co7 .--Q, � V2� &T —ri wia— -F-- ate, Sic Van THE LAND GROUP, INC. Sire P/,>rnzri • i rrr� z 4 , lrchzteztrrr� • <".zvrf F tail. r.'z� • C t�l," (".orrrcc Tyr atrrrr er T sr?zrze<.r-nti • (nzf�f; C�rarrzrrri art%�r, • S'um yri;o 462 E. Shore Dli e, Ste. 100, Eagle. Idaho `�3616 . 1' 208.939,4041 Ft 2t1$.4?39.4�� ; • � w"R,.chelzuidgrolxpuic,.coin �J - r t� W M U 11 r1 r 7 o r f° a ro F o m o m .a ~ O a 0 ar C0 0 ar �ed.. H� 9 o o a A c :- m 7 o o Q Q C O O G E zIL `i tt m G) a. a rn c N U .O Z O O E 0 t Z COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-5A-5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. I am aware of the ab P requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-5A-5. )2� 115 OF Date Page 1 of 9 Meridian Promenda, Walgreens, Meridian Village (or the many other names by which this has been referred to) has now changed to Medina Sub. Please make the necessary correction the plans, plat, records, and other information for the application. Van Elg Senior Planner 462 E. Shore Drive, suite 100 Eagle, ID 83616 ph. 208-939-4041 ext. 135 fax.208-939-4445 e�n�il. van( althelandoroupinc com From: David Couch [mailto:dscouch@adaweb.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:17 AM To: Van Elg Subject: RE: Name Reservation "Meridianite" to Medina November 21, 2006 Van Elg Land Group RE: Subdivision Name Reservation MEDINA SUBDIVISION Dear Applicant, At your request, I will reserve the name "MEDINA SUBDIVISION" for your project. I can honor this reservation only as long as your project is in the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final plat is recorded. Sincerely, David J. Couch, PLS Ada County Surveyor For procedure on reserving subdivision names go to: http://www.adaweb.net/devserv/slirvey/Rsubname htm Check out the list of subdivision names at: http://www.adaweb.neVdevserwsurvey/subnames.htm From: Van Elg[mailto:van@thelandgroupinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:12 AM To: David Couch Subject: RE: Name Reservation "Meridianite" to Medina Dave, -et's try the following name: Medina Sub 11/21 /2006 ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. �?NAVkRRO AMOUNT BOISE IDAHO 09/15/05 02:16F�``j 00 22DEPUTY Bnnie AA r RECORDED - REQUEST Of8 Meridian City 105134293 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. William and Mary Howell, Owners 3. White Leasure Development Company, Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into this 257�=day of �thState � , 2005, by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY", and WILLIAM AND MARY HOWELL whose address is 497 White Cloud Drive, Boise, Idaho 83709, hereinafter called "OWNER", and WHITE L.EASURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, whose address is 416 S. 8`sStreet, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83702. I • RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, "OWNER" is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit A for each owner, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, I.C. § 67-6511A, Idaho Code, provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re -zoning that the "Owner" and/or "Developer" make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject "Property"; and 1.3 WHEREAS, "City" has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Ordinance 11-15-12 and 11-16-4 A, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, "Developer" has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of the "Property" described in Exhibit A; and 1.5 WHEREAS, "Developer" made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before the Meridian City Council, as to how the subject "Property" will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings for the requested annexation and zoning designation of the subject "Property" held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, include responses of government subdivisions providing DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 1 of 1242 services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the 18t' day of January, 2005, has approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the "Owner" and "Developer" to enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on annexation and zoning designation; and L9 "OWNER" and "DEVELOPER" deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and 1.10 WHEREAS, "City" requires the "Owner" and "Developer" to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the "Property" is developed and the subsequent use of the "Property" is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the "City" in the proceedings for annexation and zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure annexation and zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382, and the Zoning and Development Ordinances codified in Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ_04_031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 2 of 12 ;� 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 "CITY": means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 "DEVELOPER": means and refers to White Leasure Development Company, whose address is 416 South 8`h Street, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83702, the party developing said "Property" and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the "Property". 3.3 "OWNER": means and refers to William and Mary Howell, whose address is 497 White Cloud Drive, Boise, Idaho 83709, the party owning said "Property" being developed and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the "Property". 3.4 "PROPERTY": means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of "Property" located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit A describing the parcels to be annexed and zoned C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial) attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under "CiVs" Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Section 11-7-2 Q which are herein specified as follows: Annexation and re -zone of 9.08 acres from C-2 (Ada County) to C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial) with a conceptual commercial subdivision within the Meridian entryway corridor designation. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 3 of 124-2 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING ANNEXATION AND RE -ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: B. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Department as follows: The legal description submitted with the application meets the requirement of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits. 2. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area. Essential City services can be made available to the subject property. 3. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non -domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 4. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 5. All future uses on proposed lots or parcels within the annexation area shall be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process. 6. Prior to the issuance of any building permit on the subject property, all existing uses shall be properly abandoned or brought into compliance with the Meridian City Code, Meridian Fire Department, and subject to the Conditions of ACHD and ITD. 7. The applicant shall comply with the conditions and comments of all City Departments, and other agencies. 8. The applicant shall coordinate the location and design of trash dumpster(s) with the Sanitary Services Company (SSC) staff. Trash enclosures must be built in the location and to the size approved by SSC. All dumpster(s) must be screened in accordance with MCC 11-12-1.C. Contact Bill Gregory at SSC (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal and submit stamped DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 4 of 124? (approved) plans with your certificate of zoning compliance application 9. No building or other structure shall be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered, nor shall any building structure or land be established or change in use on this site without first obtaining a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) from the Meridian Planning and Zoning Department (MCC 11-19-1. 10. All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including a paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. Any temporary occupancy will not exceed 60 days to complete the required improvements. 11. If construction has not begun within 18 months of City Council approval, a new conditional use permit must obtained prior to the start of development. 12. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in such a manner as to eliminate glare and illumination of the adjoining roadways and properties, in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 13. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted by the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off -site disposal into surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. 14. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11- 14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 15. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 16. Applicant's (or successor's) failure to comply with any of the terms of approval of the conditional use permit shall be cause for revocation of the conditional use permit. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 5 of 124--a C. Comply with all the conditions in the corresponding applications in this matt__ Request for Annexation and Zoning, AZ-04-031 and any future Conditional Use Permit requirements. D. Adopt the action of the City Council taken at their February 1, 2005 meeting as follows: For clarification: 1. All future uses on proposed lots or parcels within the annexation area shall be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit on the subject property, all existing uses shall be properly abandoned or brought into compliance with the Meridian City Code, Meridian Fire Department, and subject to the Conditions of ACHD and ITD. 7• COMPLIANCE PERIOD/ CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, upon a default of the "Owner" and/or "Developer" or "Owner" and/or "Developer's" heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with Section 6 entitled "Conditions Governing Development" of subject "Property" of this agreement within two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the "City" has complied with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in I.C. § 67-6509, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. 6. CONSENT TO DE -ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: "Owner" and/or "Developer" consent upon default to the de -annexation and/or a reversal of the zoning designation of the "Property" subject to and conditioned upon the following conditions precedent to -wit: 8.1 That the "City" provide written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to "Owner" and/or "Developer" and if the "Owner" and/or "Developer" fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. 9• INSPECTION: "Owner" and/or "Developer" shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the "Property" as required by this agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the "City" that apply to said Development. 10. DEFAULT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 6 of 124,1 10.1 In the event "Owner" and/or "Developer", "Owner" and/or "Developer's" heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the "Property" or any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property", fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the "Property", this Agreement may be modified or terminated by the "City" upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 10.2 A waiver by "City" of any default by "Owner" and/or "Developer" of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of "City" or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. 11. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: "City" shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at "Developer's" cost, and submit proof of such recording to "Owner" and/or "Developer", prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" contemplated hereby, the "City" shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 12. ZONING: "City" shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the "Property" as specified herein. 13. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either "City" or "Owner" and/or "Developer", or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 13.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that "City" and "Owner" and/or "Developer" shall have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non -breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY —Page 7 of 124-2 (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 13.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either "Owner" and/or "Developer" or "City" is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 14. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The "City" may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under Meridian City Code § 12-5-3, to insure that installation of the improvements, which the "Owner" and/or "Developer" agrees to provide, if required by the "City". 15. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The "Owner" and/or "Developer" agrees that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the "City" and "Owner" and/or "Developer" have entered into an addendum agreement stating when the improvements will be completed in a phased developed; and in any event, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the "City". 16. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That "Owner" and/or "Developer" agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the "Property" shall be subject to de -annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 17. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: DEVELOPER: c/o City Engineer White Leasure Development Company City of Meridian 416 S. 8`b Street, Suite 200 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY - Page 8 of 1242- 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 with copy to: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Boise, Idaho 83702 OWNER: William and Mary Howell 497 White Cloud Drive Boise, Idaho 83709 17.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 18. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 19. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 20. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including "City's" corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the "Owner" and/or "Developer" of the "Property", each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property". Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the "Property", or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. "City" agrees, upon written request of "Owner" and/or "Developer", to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if "City", in its sole DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY —Page 9 of 121-2 and reasonable discretion, had determined that "Owner" and/or "Developer" has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 21. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Owner" and/or "Developer" and "City" relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between "Owner" and /or "Developer" and "City", other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to "City", to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of "City". 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject "Property" herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the "City" has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and Made it effective as hereinabove provided. DEVELOPER: BY: Vtii asure D pment Company DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 10 of 12--? ATTEST: William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) OWNERS: William Howell BY:k/, , c L 'r Mary lywefl CITY OF MERIDIAN of o�G BEAL7. _ On this d day of t(�(- , in the year 2005, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared _ !� (sir 1�( "U r� -,, , known or identified to � me to be the _QIt'VVtp..Vl 9 - V1k- 1;,kAtrK of White Leasure Development Company, and the person who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that they having executed the ffNOANCYTHRONG n e a o sae corrpporate n. AH NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO (SE Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: 90ISP , DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-04-031) MERIDIAN GATEWAY — Page 11 of 124? Commission expires: 'oto STATE OF IDAHO ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) On this 1-"4day of AKWA' , in the year 2005, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared LAM and MARY HOWELL, husband and wife, known or identified to me to be the persons who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that they having executed the same. (SE=)NANCYTHRONGAIRD STATE OF IDAHO ) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: P.2D6?­ Commission expires: Lfi'IB_Q ss County of Ada ) s'l uch, GtJdli On this day of •e tej (; : , in the year 2005, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared 1� and William G. Berg, Jr., known or identified to me to be theMuyur and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me t t such City executed the same. C'/s 66c"C't , preride,o, t (1 '0,51*118881aaa ,,..• y SMITv (SEAL) +'���G� f••NaaaaN a �O Pv :S: •••,aaaa `S 1 A 1 �a VY �� `�J a•••4urru+•'•• DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-03-027) PAGE 12 OF 12121-3 iblic for Idaho ion expires: EXHIBIT A Legal Description Meridian Gateway AZ-04031 Roylance & Associates P.A. Engineers • 5urveyms • Larxlplarne(s 391 vi_ Stale Street, sole E; Eag�, bdzito g2,t6 Telephone (208) 95:2824 Fax (2C1i8} 93&2855 October 15, 2004 Project Number 25W Legal Description White -Leasure Development Company Annexation Area 9.08 Acres A tract of land siivatcd in the Northeast One Quarter of the Northeast Onc Quarter of Section 24, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at the Section Comer rnonumenting the Northeast corner of said Section 24 and the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following the northerly line of said Section 24 and the centerline of West Overland Road, Notch 89146'45" West a distance of 525,00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northctiy line and the centerline of West Overland Road, South 00-37.36' Wcst a distance of 753.50 fat to a point on the northerly line of Elk Run Subdivision, a recorded plat on fik in Book 63 of Plats at pages 6303 and 6304, Records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence following said northerly line South 89°46'45" East a distance: of 525.00 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Section 24 and the eenterlinc of South Meridian Road; "Ihcncc leaving said northerly line and following the westerly line of Section 24 and the centerline of South Meridian Road, North 00"37'36" Fast a distance of 753.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. "The above -described tract of land contains 9.08 acres, more or less, Subject to all existing casements and rights -of -way. Prepared By: ROYLANCE & ASSOCIATES P.A. 391 W. STATE STREET, SU F EAGLE, IDAI10 83616 tto ,L (208) 939.2824 felt (208) 939.2855 FAXtAC pC 2 5 ZW4 M gjoRKS oepl 0 — t $-0-i x!PmimsSWlyle, [eaureLsum am, A.4'p. �l��y,r�3 ;�cre_annexnrgn ct�C Exhibit B Annexation and Zoning Analysis/Facts and Findings Meridian Gateway (File AZ-04-0.31) ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS Section 50-222 Idaho Code allows cities of the State of Idaho to annex lands which are reasonably necessary to assure the orderly development of the city in order to allow efficient and economically viable provisions of tax -supported and fee -supported municipal services, to enable the orderl development of 12rivate lands which benefit from the cost-effective availabilit of munici al services in urbanizin areas and to equitably allocate the costs of public services in management of development on the urban fnnae. The subject annexation complies with the provisions for annexation established in Section 50-222, Idaho Code, The subject annexation is eligible for, and is being processed in compliance with the Category "B" annexation requirements established in Section 50-222, Idaho Code, According to Ordinance 11-15-I1, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment. " The following is the list ofstandards found in Meridian City Code 11-15-11 and analysis by staff: "A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; The 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the subject property as "Commercial". In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, "Commercial" areas are anticipated to provide a full range of commercial and retail to serve area residents and visitors. Uses may include retail, wholesale, service and office uses, multi -family residential, as well as appropriate public uses such as government offices. Staff finds that the requested C-G zoning generally conforms to this stated purpose and intent of the Commercial designation. Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action items contained in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in italics below policy): • "Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 2) The subject property has frontage on both an arterial roadway, Kuna- Meridian Road, and a collector roadway, Overland Road. The existing uses adjacent to this site have not yet developed to the expected residential densities or Commercial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Because the adjoining properties are still somewhat rural in nature, the development of retail uses as described in the Conceptual plan may complement the existing uses. Depending on how the rest of the site builds -out, this development may or may not compliment adjoining residential developments to the south and west of the site. • "Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Impact Area." (Chapter VII, Goal 1, Objective B) The proposed and existing uses do provide a variety of commercial uses in this area, as envisioned with the Comprehensive Plan. "Require all commercial businesses to install and maintain landscaping." (Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action item 5) The Applicant has not addressed the requirement to install landscaping adjacent to the existing commercial uses that are to remain on -site. Staff has conditioned that the required setbacks for Landscaping and Buildings be installed upon reception of a detailed development proposal and prior to issuance of any building permits to facilitate the Entryway Corridor comprehensive goal, the anticipated roadway requirements of ITD and ACHD, the Meridian Fire District, and the City of Meridian Zoning Code. • "On -street bikeways should be incorporated on all future Collector streets." (Chapter VI, Figure VI-5) Figure VI--5 on page 57 of the Comprehensive Plan designates a bikeway on both Overland Road and Kuna-Meridian Road adjacent to the site. The Applicant has not addressed the issues of bikeways adjacent to the site. Staff is recommending that the Applicant worn; with ACHD to provide a bike lane on Overland Road, but not Kuna-Meridian Road. Because the posted speed limit on Kttna Meridian Road is 55 MPH, staff does not believe that a bikeway should be required. • "Consider "Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach" from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all land use decisions." (Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action item 3) This publication encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway facilities in new construction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has a policy for access to a Type IV Principal Arterial will be at intersections only, and spaced at ate -half mile intervals in urban areas. ITD allows approaches (other than intersections) in special cases and on a temporary basis. Stafffinds that the proposed access points to Kuna-Meridian Road (SH 69) and Overland Road shall be subject to the location requirements of ITD and ACHD respectively, Incompliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan no curb cuts shall be allowed on Kuna Meridian Road (SH 69). • "Require appropriate landscape and buffers along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.)." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 4) The Applicant has not addressed landscaping adjacent to the existing uses that are to remain on -site. ITD has a policy that its ficture right of way width on Kuna-Meridian Road will be 120 feet on each side of the centerline (240 feet total) for building setbacks and to include a frontage road; or, 70 feet each side of centerline (140 feet total) if the developer provides an internal frontage road type system to feeder roads. The general requirements of ITD would not be in compliance with the existing use and would require compliance upon approval of a detailed site plan and/or subdivision and/or conditional use permit issuance. Stafffinds that the existing building setbacks, landscape inadequacies, and the potential for right-of-way acquisition create a unique situation for the site. In order to mitigate anticipated problems a development agreement will be required. • "Permit new ...commercial development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City." (Chapter IV, Goal I, Objective A, Action item 6) The Meridian Fire Department has not submitted written comments for this site as the plans submitted based on the conceptual retail use only. One of the comments received from the Fire Department states that the existing convenience store has several items of concern that would require compliance upon approval of a detailed site plan and/or subdivision and/or conditional use permit issuance. The subject site is readily serviceable by City of Meridian's sanitary sewer and water systems. • "Locate new community commercial areas on arterials or collectors near residential areas in such a way as to complement with adjoining residential areas." (Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective B, Action item 5) safe, accessible and convenient. The detailed site plan must address these issues. . B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; Staff does not anticipate that the Applicant intends to rezone the subject property in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning — for example, a residential area turning into commercial area by means of conditional use permits; Convenience stores require conditional use permit approval in the C-G zone. Residential uses are prohibited in the C-G zone. The existing Junkyard business is not allowed in a C-G zone and would be required to conform to the submitted conceptual plan and cease operation. The purpose of the C-G District is to provide for commercial uses, which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a building (MCC 11-7-2.K). Staff finds that the proposed convenience store and the existing Junkyard are not principally permitted uses in the C-G zone. The convenience store would require separate conditional use approval. The existing junkyard is prohibited and does not conform to the proposed zoning. D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Southern Springs Subdivisions 1-3 have recently been annexed and developed with commercial land uses in this area. There are several developments in the area that have developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area. Kuna-Meridian Road was recently widened in this area by ITD. Overland Road is scheduled by ACHD for improvements in the current Five Year Work Program or CIP. The intersection of Overland Road/Kuna-Meridian Road is a signalized intersection with directional traffic being controlled. The Commission and Council should rely on the preceding facts and any public testimony to determine whether the changes in the area dictate that this area should be annexed into the City and zoned C-G at this time. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed C-G zone with the proposed retail uses if designed, constructed and operated in accordance with adopted city ordinances, should be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the intended character of the vicinity. The site is intended to be utilized for commercial uses which, based on the Comprehensive Plan description, will have such uses as retail, wholesale, service and office uses, multi -family residential, as well as appropriate public uses such as government offices. The existing uses do not conform to the harmonious and appropriate appearance of the existing general vicinity and would be required upon redevelopment to conform to these goals and policies. F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; The existing uses on the site are hazardous to neighboring uses. Accessory to the existing businesses, there are chemicals, gasoline, and assorted automobile wastes stored on this site. Appropriate buffers should be required on the north and east boundaries of this development, as the abutting uses are less -intense than the proposed and existing uses (see MCC 12-13-12-4). The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine whether the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the neighboring uses. G. WiIl the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Staff finds that the recent roadway improvements to Kuna-Meridian Road (SH 69) should be adequate to serve this project for the short term. However, ITD has indicated that SH 69 is not constructed to its ultimate section and will need to be widened again in the future. Based on recent correspondences, ITD needs additional right-of-way and/or a frontage road adjacent to/through this property. Improvements to Overland Road in this area have not taken place in the recent past, and except for the signalization at SH 69, improvements are anticipated within the next 20 years. Based on past correspondence with ACHD, Planning staff believes that this site will add a significant amount of traffic to the roadway system upon build out. This site has over 500 feet of frontage on Overland Road. Based on future development applications staff is conditioning that the Applicant enter into a development agreement with the City to require improvements (landscaping, sidewalk, bike lane, road widening, turn -lane, etc.) to Overland Road, subject to ACHD requirements, with site -specific standards conditions to be met in accordance with approval of the subject development. On December 3, 2004, a joint agency/department comments meeting was held with representatives of key service providers to this property. The Meridian Fire Department has concerns with serviceability of this site, as it contains several non -conforming uses that do not meet standards for service. Because the applicant has not identified all future buildings within this development, such buildings will be subject to further review and comments by Meridian Fire Department, The Commission and Council should reference any written or verbal testimony submitted by the Meridian Police Department, and any other agency not listed above, regarding their ability to adequately service this project. Staff finds that the property proposed for annexation can be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services as conditioned. H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; If this annexation/development is approved, the developer will be financing the extension of sewer, water, local/internal street infrastructure, utilities and irrigation services to serve the project. The primary public costs to serve the future site will be fire and police services. Staff finds that this development will not cause excessive additional requirements at public cost. I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that the convenience store uses involve activities, processes, materials, equipment or conditions that could produce excessive traffic, noise, fumes and/or odors, as well as other negative public impacts. A key Question that should be discussed at th ublic hearin is whether the im acts will be "excessive." MCC I 1-12-2 and 11-12-3 are intended to mitigate impacts of special uses such as fire hazards, bulk storage, noises. In the Applicant's letter, they do not address the convenience store. Conditions associated with a CUP and/or Development Agreement could establish use parameters that would prevent detrimental effects. In order to establish guidelines to mffl ate the antici ated detrimental as gets of the Proposed and existing uses the Annlirnnt should clan the ro osed uses during the public hearing J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that any future uses may impact the level and flow of traffic on the surrounding roadways. Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City should "Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 2). K. L. ACHD has not evaluated the_Rkqposed access tc_ihis_site from Overland_ oad,_ while ITD has jurisdiction over access to Kuna-Meridian Road (SH 69). The ITD and ACHD reports for future siteprojects should provide additional information ------- - regar mg t is portion of this finding. Staff feels that the accesses will be t� C'-T adequately addresse 6y future applications. ITD has indicated to the City the policy for access to a Type IV Principal Arterial (SH 69) will be at intersections only, and spaced at one-half mile intervals in urban areas. lTD allows approaches (other than intersections) in special cases and on a temporary basis (see letter from ITD). ITD's policy on approaches lessens the ability of driveways to create interference on the roadways. Staff finds that no curb cuts or access to Kuna-Meridian Road shall be taken from this si et upon development. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and Staff is not aware of any natural or scenic feature(s) that would be lost, damaged or destroyed by allowing this site to be annexed, zoned and developed with commercial uses. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. Future development shall be in compliance with the Scenic and Historical Byway goals and policies. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)' Stafffinds that the annexation and zoning of this property as mitigated through a development agreement may be in the best interest of the City for the following reasons; • the developments in the area have developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area (commercial); • municipal sanitary sewer and water systems are readily available to provide service; • the proposed retail stores use may involve activities, processes, materials, equipment and/or conditions that will produce additional traffic, noise, fumes and/or odors, as well as other negative public impacts that can be mitigated through development of the site; • the existing uses that are to remain, signage, landscaping, public infrastructure (sidewalk, bike lanes), screening, drive -aisles, or parking, are to be brought into compliance with current City Code upon development of the site; • the existing building setbacks, landscaping, and lack of a frontage road or accounting for additional right-of-way on Kuna-Meridian Road does not meet policies outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Meridian City Code and would be required prior to redevelopment of the site; Map' Mr. Howell has the following violations of Ada County Code, Title 8 existing on his property that will be mitigated through redevelopment of the site: According to the Ada County Code Enforcement Offccer, Mr. Howell has a non permitted Junkyard. At the present time without having an approved detailed site plan, the area where the existing junk automobiles are being displayed is in violation of Ada County Code. ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS The legal description submitted with the application meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits. 2. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area. Essential City services can be made available to the subject property. 3. All future development on said property shall comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of application. 4. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non - domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 5. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a Development Agreement (DA) shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, property owner (at the time of annexation ordinance adoption), and the developer. The applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433 to initiate this process. —The DA shall incorporate the following: All future uses on proposed lots or parcels within the annexation area shall be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the subject property, all existing uses shall be properly abandoned or brought into compliance with the Meridian City Code, Meridian Fire Department, and subject to the conditions of ACHD and ITD. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS AZ-04-031 The Meridian Fire Department has not provided written testimony for the annexation. The fire agency has indicated to staff during the agency comments meeting that they would be requiring compliance upon redevelopment of the site. In particular, they noted the following specific concerns. • The underground storage tanks for the convenience store shall be verified as registered with the Department of Environmental Quality • The tank located at the right of way between Overland Road and Kuna-Meridian Road (SH 69) shall be relocated to an appropriate location. • All flammable fluids contained in the junkyard shall be disclosed and/or stored in an appropriate and defined location. • The remediation of any gasoline spills shall be verified as clean or in progress of being remediated. MATCRIALS TcsriNcv & INSPECTION -i Environmental Services -1 GeolecMical Enginpering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT of Proposed Retail Development SW Corner of Overland and Meridian Roads Meridian, Idaho Prepared for: White-LEasure Development Company 416 South Sth Strr=Et, Suite 200 Boisc, Idaho 83502 MTI File Number 8508E35g 7446 W. Lenihi St. 0 Boise, ID 83709 0 (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mad niti@Mti-id.com * www.n)ti-id.com ''i' § MATERIALS' TESTiNGi 1 NSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page # I of 30 J Enviroomental Services J Geotechnicat En9ineotint3 J Construction Nlalerials Testincl J Special Inspections W*iscrver2\boiscN2005 reportsl800-9991b30SS5gtb5O885geciech.doc Nit% Kerr Lenz White -Leasure Development Company 416 South 8th Street, Suite 200 Boise, Itlaho 83502 (208) 345-1842 Re; Geoteehnical Engineering Report Proposed Retail Development SW Corder of Overland and Meridian Roads Meridian, Idaho Gentlemen: III compliance with your instructions, we have conducted a soils exploration and foumlation evaluation for the above mentioned development. Field work for this investigation was conducted from 30 June 2005 to 7 July 2005, Data have been analyzed to evaluate pertinent geotechnical conditions. Provided geoteclrnical, groundwater and construction recommendations are listed in the Table of Contents. Results of this investigation, together with our recommendations, are to be found in the following report. We have provided three copies for your review and distribution. Often, because of design and construction details that occur oil a project, questions arise concerning soil conditions. We would be pleased to continue our role as geotechnical engineers during project implementation. MTl also has great interest in providing materials testing and special ittspectioti services during construction of this project. If you will advise its of the appropriate time to discuss these engineering services, we will he pleased to meet with you at your convenience, We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and we look forward to working with you in the fixture, If you have questions please call its at (208) 376-4748. Jesse Barr-ttg -E.T. Staff Engincer Respectfully Submitted, i1°Iaterials Testing & Inspection, Inc. Revie ved tSl Kevin L. Schroer Geotechnical Set -vices Matra Revter.bv Michael G. Woo, Senior Geoteclmical Engineer Copyright ' 200i Materials Testing & Inspection, inc. 7446 W. Lenthi SI. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mailmti@mti-d.co►n + wvvw.niti-id.com MATERIALS"' TESTING & INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page It 2 of 30 .J Environmental Services J Geotechnicat Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Sper,=al Inspection$ I\nrtiservcr2lboise12003 reporii i\800-999`,b50885gib50855gcotedi.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS EWCUTIVE St';MMAR)..., ..................... ............. ........ ..3 INTRODUCTION ......... .. .. .. .. . ................. ......... .... ... ..5 ProjectDescription ......... ........................................................ ..................5 Authorization...................... .......... ........... .. ... .....................5 Pill -Pose ...... . .............................. .... .._, ... .. ..... ..................5 Scope.................................................................... ................................. ......... ...... 5; Warranty And Limiting Conditions ................................. ......... ..................6: General................. ,................................ ................................ .....:. .,................6 DFS('RIPTt0N OF SITE...... ............................................ ......... ..............................7 SiteAccess__ .........................................................................................................7 GeneralGeology Of Area ............ .................................. ......... ..................7 Site "Topography, Drainage And Vegetafion................................. ...............,..7 Site Climatology And Geochemistry ............................ ,................... ..................8' GeoseismicSetting..... ............................................................ .. ..................8 Sons ExPLORATIOX ......... .................... .......... ... .......... ........... .........8 Exploration mid Sampling Procedures ................... ......... ......... ..............8 Laboratory Testing Program.......................................................................9` Soil And Sediment Profile.........•.•......................................................................9 SoilsSurvey Review.......................................................................................9 Environniental Concerns ............. ...................................... ......... .............. .....,1.0 SITEHYDROLOGY......................................................................... ......................10 GeneralNotes .................................................................. .................... to Groundwater................................................................................... ,......,..........to Sail Infiltration Rates .................. ...,.................. ................................................... I I FOUNDATION, SLAU AND PAVEMENT DISCUSSION AND RF:eo NIENDATIOIS..................I I GeneralNotes ................................ ,........ ...................... ..............................I I Foundation Design Recommendations ..... ......... ......... ......... ..................I I FloorSlab-On-Grade......................................................... .._...... ......._.,........12 RecoImilended Pavement Sections ............. ...................... ......... .................. 13 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ....................................... ... .............15 Earthwork................................................................... ..... .......,.. _................15 Dr.), Weather ........ .................. ...................................... ........ .............. .................... 16 WetWeather................................................................................. .................. .I6 Frozen Subgrade Soils ..... ......... ......... ..................... ......... ............_.....16 StructuralFill .................... . ....... ........................................... .................16 Backfill....................... .. ............................... ... . _. ..... .17 Fwavations.................................... ........................... .................. ......................... 17 GroundwaterCouh•ol.............................,.........,....................... ..............1.8 GFNEIL11, COJINIFNTS................................. .................,.............................................A 8 RF.FERF.NCF.S ............................................. ................................................................19 AI'PFsNDIX LIST..................................................„............................................................20 Geotechnical General Notes....- ................. .............................. .................... 21 Unified Soil Classification ....................................................................................22 TestPit Logs ... .... .... ..... ............... ......................... ..................... ....,........................ 23 Pavement Thickness Design......................................................... .................28 C.B.R. DATA .......................................... ........................ „................ ,.......... .......... .30 Copyright ' 2005 Materials Tcstirig & Inspection, inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mli@lmi-id.com • www.mti-id.com W1P. MATeRIALS AV INsd eCTION 11/ July 27, 2005 Page tt 3 of 30 i EnV:rof rmital Services I Geotechnical Englneeritttl J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections llmtismerT%boise\2005 reports\800-999',bSO885g\bSO885t;eotcch.rlac EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following is a'brief summary of significant geoteehnical issues for the proposed development, presented with conclusioins and recommendations, This summary must be read in conjunction with the entire accompanying report for proper interpretation of the overall investigation. Building Foundations: On the basis of data obtained from the site and test results from various laboratory tests performed, MTI recommends following guidelines be used for the net allowable soils bearing; capacity. ASTM D 1557 Net Allowable Soils Footing Depth - 'Val reen's Subgrade Compaction Bearing Capacity Footings (Must bear oil competent, native, Not Required for cemented sandy silt soils, gravel sediments, or Cemented Soil 2,500 lbslfl' compacted structural fill. Existing lean clay and fill soils must be completely removed from below 95% for Structural Fill all foundation elements. Excavation depths of tip to 6.5 feet should be anticipated for removal of fill and clays. ASTM D 1557 Net Allowable Sails Footing Depth — Large Retail Building Subgrade Compaction Bearing Capacity Footings must bear oil competent, native, gravel Not Required for Native sediments, or compacted structural fill. Existing Soil 3,000 lbsrtt2 fills (near test pit 3) and organics must be completely removcd from below all foundation 95% for Structural Bill elements. Excavations of tip to 2 feet should be anticipated to remove fi1L Building Floor Slabs: Walgreen's Before the placing of concrete floors on site, or before floor supporting fill is placed, organic, loose or obviously compressive materials must be removed, The remaining subgrade should be treated in accordance with Earthwork guidelines and other Construction Considerations presented later in this report. Areas of excessive yielding should be excavated and backfilled with structural fill. Uncontrolled, debris containing fill was encountered in this portion of the site. In floor slab areas it is recommended that these fill soils be excavated to a sufficient depth to exuose conloctent. native soils, or to a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below finished sub rade and replaced with iin aorted structural fill. Prior to olaceinent,of structural fill< the exi)osed subrsrade should be conmacted and proof -rolled, with anv soft or loose areas excavated and replaced with structural fill. Therefore, the presence of qualified soils technician during excavation is recomlliclided to identify these soils in the field. Imported fill placed below the floor slab should meet the requirements for structural fill. All existing fill and fill placed beneath the floor slab must be compacted to a minimum 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM'D 1557. Copyright ` 2005 Materials Testing ,& inspection, tile. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, IQ 83709 o (208) 376.4748 • Fax'(208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-icl.coni ► www.mtkid.com .Ip MATERIALS (a Od TESTING I NSPeCTION July 27, 2005 Page # 4 of 30 J Environmental Service -1 Geotechnical Engineering -1 Construction Materials Testing J Spacial Inspections \Vntiserver2lboise,2005 reports1400-9991bS0885g,b50S85geotech.doe Building Floor Slaps: Large Retail Building Before the placing of concrete floors oil site, er before floor supporting till is placed, organic, loose or obviously compressive materials must be removed. The remaining Subgrade Sllollld be treated in accordance with Earthwork guidelines and other Construction Considerations presented later in this report. Areas of excessive yielding should be excavated and backfilled with structural fill. Uncontrolled fill was encountered near test pit ,3. In floor slab areas it is recotll►llended t)iat fit) soils identified be excavated to a sllfficielit depth to expose cornnetellt Native soils, or to a itiinilllti►11 depth of l.5 feet below finished sub r��de and replaced with imported structural fill Prior to placement of structural fill the exposed subgrade should be compacted and proof -rolled, with any soft or loose areas excavated and replaced with structural fill Therefore, the presence of qualified soils technician during excavation is recommendcd to identify these soils in the field. Imported fill placed below the floor slab should meet the requirements for structltral fill. All existing fill and fill placed beneath the floor slab must be compacted to a minimum 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. Pavement The AASHTO design tnctllod has been used to calculate the following pavement sections. Calculation sheets provided in the Appendix indicate the soils constant, traffic loading, traffic projections and material constants Used to calculate the pavcment sections. MTI recommends that lllatGrlals Used in the construction of Asphaltic Concrete Pavements sleet requirements .of the State of Idaho Transportation Department (I D) Standard Specification .for Highway Constl•uctioll, Construction of the pavement section should be in accordance with these specifications and should adhere to guidelines recommended in the section oil Construction Considerations. Pavement Section Com onetit �rive�tia sand Pal kilt ,1�'o Tzu�k Access Drir ewa s and Parkin, Truck Access Asphaltic Concrete 2.5 inches 3.0 Inches Crushed Aggregate Base 4.0 Inches 6.0 Inches Structural Sub -Base 10.0 Inclles 14.0 inclics� Compacted Sub grade Not Required Mot Rec aired Aggregate Base Niaterial complying, with ITD Standard Specifications for Highway Construction sections 303 and 703 for aggregates. Structural Stibbase Material complying with the requirement for granular structural fill in the Soils Report EXCEPT that maximum material diameter is no more than 2/3 of the component thickness. ' If poorly gradcd gavels are exposed in the sub -grade this may be compacted and t� sled in place of ille coltlpacted sub -base. Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, ]ric. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail iiiti@niti-id.com • www.mti-id.com M ATERIALS " July 27, 2005 TESTING & Page # 5 of 30 INSPrECTION J Environmental Services J Geotechnival Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections \\,raiser%•er2\bois02005 reports\500-999\b50885g\b5OS85g otech.doc INTRODucriON This report presents results of a geoteellnical investigation and analysis in support of data utilized in design of structures as defined in the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). Information in support of groundwater and stormwater issuespertinent to the practice of Civil Engineering is included. Observations and recommendations relevant to the earthwork phase of the project are also presented. Project Description: The proposed development is in the southwest portion of (lie City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and occupies a portion of the S1:'/,NI'/a of Section 24, 'Township 3 North, Range 1 Nest, Boise Meridian. The }project will consist of commercial development of ,in approximate 7-acre site for a 'Walgreen's and a large retail building with associated parking lots. Total settlements are limited to I inch. Loads of tarp to 2,000 pounds per lineal foot for wall footings, and column loads of tip to 50,000 pounds were assumed for settlement calculations. Additionally, assumptions have been trade for traffic loading of pavements. Retaining walls are not anticipated as part of the project. MTI has not been infornrecl of proposed grading. Authorization: AUtborizatlon to perform this exploration and analysts was given in the form of a written authorization to proceed from Mr. Ken Lenz to Jesse Barrus of Materials Testing and Inspection, Inc. (MTI), on 6 July 2005. Said authorization is subject to terms, conditions, and limitations described in the Professional Services Contract entered into between White -Leasure Development Company and MTI. OUr scope of services for the proposed development has been provided in our revised proposal dated 6 July 2005, and again below. Purpose: The purpose of this Gcotechnical Engineering Report into determine various soil profile components and their engineering characteristics for use by design engineers and/or architects in: • Preparing or verifying suitability of foundation design and placement, • Preparing site drainage designs, • Indicating issues pertaining to earthwork construction. Scope: The scope of this investigation included review of geologic literature and existing available geotechnical studies of the area, review of available environmental reports, visual site reconnaissance of the immediate site, subsurface exploration, field and laboratory testing, and an engineering analysis and evaluation of foundation materials. Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, hic. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, to 83709 • (208) 376-4748 + Fax (208) 322.6515 E-Mail mti@mti-itl•com • tivww.mti-id.com u July 27, 2005 Page 9 6 of 30 J Environmental Services J Ceol chnical Engineering J Cons1ruction M alOnals Tesstin0 J Special It)spections ltmtiserver2lboisc12005 reportsk8(70-999,b5O885g%50885gcotccit.doc Warranty And Limiting Conditions: Field observations and research reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to form a reasonable basis for the ptu•poses cited above. MTI warrants that findings and conclusions contained herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the fields of foundation engineering, soilmechanics and engineering geology, only for the site and project described in this report. These engineering methods have been developed to provide the client with information regarding apparent or potential engineering conditions relating to the subject property within the scope cited above and are necessarily limited to conditions observed at the time of the site visit and research. The report is also limited to information available at the time it was prepared. In the event additional itnfonmtiorn, is provided to NI I following the report, it will be forwarded to the client in the forth received for evaluation by the client. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the investigation or which were not apparent during the site investigation, The findings of this report are limited to data collected from noted explorations advanced, and do not account for as yet unidentified fill zones, unsuitable soil types or conditions, and variability in soil moisture and groundwater conditions. Upon commencement of construction, such conditions may be identified, of whiclt the required corrective actions may impact the project budget. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of White -Leasure Development Company and their retained design consultants ("Client"). Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based upon agreed -upon scope of work outlined in the report and Contract for Professional Services between Client and Materials Testing and Inspection, Inc. ("Consultant"). Use or misuse of this report, or reliance upon findings hereof by parties other than the Client, is at their own risk. Neither Client nor Consultant make representation of warranty to such other parties as to accuracy or completeness of this report or suitability of its use by such other parties for purposes whatever, known or unknown to Client or Consultant. Neither Client nor Consultant shall have liability to, or indemnifies or holds har nnless third parties for losses incurred by actual or purported use or misuse of this report. No other warranties are implied or expressed. General: Revisions in plans and of drawings for the proposed development from those enumerated in this report should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer to determine if changes in foundation recommendations are required. Deviations from noted subsurface conditions if encountered during construction, should also be brought to the attention of the soils engineer, Copyright ` 2005 Materials Testing fit Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.conr • wmv.nA-id.com MATERIALS ••� July 27. 2005 Te TIN6 Page 1# 7 of 30INSPecriON J Environmental Services J Geolechnical Engineering J Constaiction Materials Testing J Special Inspections fttiserver2\15oise\2005 reports1800-999%b50885gib50885geotech.(Joe DESC.RIP110N Or SITE Site Access: Access to the site may be gained via Interstate 84 to the Meridian Road exit. Proceed south on Meridian' Road to its intersection with Overland Road. The 7 acre parcel is located on the southwest corder of this intersection. Presently the site exists as a gas station with associated parking, and undeveloped pasture ]and; The location is depicted in site map plates included in the Appendix. General Geology Of Area: The subject site is located within the Boise Valley which is directly underlain by a thick sequence of alluvial sands and gravels typically deposited on basalt formatitons. These sediments are loosely tamed the Boise River Gravels and were deposited as river floodplain and stream outwash from the Boise River. These gravel deposits tend to have imbricated well-rounded clasts, poor sorting and crude stratification. Bcds of gravel and lenses of cross -bedded sands/silts suggest deposition in braided channels. The `Boise River Gravels consist of unconsolidated clay, silt, sand, gravel, arid cobbles. The Boise River Gravels have been subdivided into smaller units based on their age an(] are exposed as distinct alluvial terraces. Five of these terraces are well exposed in the Boise area and range in age from Middle Pleistocene to Holocene (<1 million years ago). The site is situated on the Sunrise Terrace, the third terrace above the flood plain. The Sunrise Terrace generally consists of sandy pebble and cobble gravels with a mantling of 3 to 7 feet of loess. The entire thickness is approximately 45 feet. Underlying these soils are poorly graded free draining, washed' sands and sandy gravels (0thberg and Stanford, 1992). Site Topography, Drainage And Vegetation: The 7 acre proposed development has been curt to relatively flat terrain, with an approximate 2 feet horizontal to I foot vertical (2:1) slope bordering the property an the south and west sides that are approximately 15 feet high. The surface exhibits commonly coarse grained soils through most of the parcel. Less than an acre with in thenortheasternportion of the property has been developed as a fuel station with surrounding pavement. Regional drainage is north toward the Boise River. Stornwater drainage for the site is achieved predominantly by percolation through surficial soils. One drop inlet stromwater drain is located on Overland Road near the north west corner of the site. The area may receive some off site drainage from the south and west slopes. Vegetation throughout the area consists primarily of native and other volunteer grass varieties typical of and to semi -arid environments with some mature trees in the in the northwestern portion of the site. Cvpyri is ht' 2005 Materials Testing k inspection, Inc. 7446 W. L,emhi St. •Eloise, ID 83709 a (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.eom MATERIALS TESTING INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page 11 8 of 30 -1 Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing _Special Inspections V`mtiscrver2\boisc\2005 repoiis%800-999tb50885gibSO885geolech.doc Site Climatology And Geochemistry: Average precipitation for the region is on the order of 10 to 12 inches per year. Animal average temperature range 1rom 200 F to 9 P F' with extremes ranging from A' F to 102' F. Average win([ speed range to 11 miles per hour in spring with a prevailing direction from the SOLItIMISt. Soil in the area is primarily derived froill SiliCCOUS materials and exhibits low electro-chemical potential for corrosion of metals or concretes. Local aggregates are generally appropriate for Portland Cement and Lime Cement mixtures, Tile State Transportation Department has adopted anionic asphalt cements. The pH of surface water, groundwater, and soil in the region typically range from 7 to 9. No indication of abnormal geochenlical conditions was noted on -site. Nominal frost penetration is typically on the order of 6 inches, with extremes ranging to 3 feet. Geoseisinic Setting: Soils on -site are classed as Site Class D in accordance with Chapter 16 of the 2003 edition of the 113C. Building structures on this project should be designed as per the IBC requirement for Such a WiSnliC classification, Our investigation did not reveal potential hazards resulting from earthquake motions: slope 9 slope instability, liquefaction, and surface rupture because of faulting or lateral spreading. Incidence and anticipated acceleration of scismie activity in the area is low. Sons EXPLORATION Exploration And Sampling Procedures: The field exploration to detennine engineering characteristics of subsurface materials included a reconnaissance of the project site and investigation by test pit and soil borings. Exploration sites were located in the field by means of normal taping procedures from on -site features or known locations alld are presumed to be accurate to within a few feet. Upon completion of investigation, each test pit was backfilled in with loose excavated materials. These loose areas need to be re -excavated and compacted prior to constructing structures over them. Borings were advanced between sampling intervals by means of a truck-1110MUC(I drilling rig equipped with hollow -stem augers. Samples were obtained with a standard split spoon sampler atid SPT blow counts were recorded. Delayed water level observations were made in the open borelioles to evaluate ground water conditions. Borings were backfilled at completion of exploration with loose excavated inaterials. Samples were obtained at approximate two to five foot intervals within the soil borings and from representative soil strata encountered in test pits. Samples obtained have been visually classified in the field by an engineer, identified according to boring and test pit number and depth, placed in sealed containers and transported to our laboratory for additional testing. These materials have been Further described in detail on logs provided in the Appendix. Results of field and laboratory tests are also presented on these logs. It is recommended that these logs not be used for estimating quantities because ofbighly interpretive results. Copyright' 2005 Ma(crials'resting & Inspectiorl, hit. 7446 W. Lernhi St. , Boise, ID 83709 - (208) 376-4748 , Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail niti@rnti-id.corn a www.mtl-id.com . LLVINSPeCTION July 27, 2005 Page ## 9 of 30 J Environmental Services J Ceotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections Umtiserve0boise12005 reports,800-999bS0885glb5O8S5geotech.doe Laboratory Testing Program: Along with the field investigation, a supplemental laboratory testing program was conducted to determine additional pertinent engineering characteristics of subsurface materials necessary in analyzing the behavior of the proposed structures. Laboratory tests were conducted according to current applicable American Society for Testing and :Materials (ASTM) specifications, an(] results of these tests are to be found on the accompanying logs located in the Appendix. The laboratory testing, program for this report included Atterberg Limits Tests - ASTM designation D 4318, and Grain Size Analysis - ASTM designation C 117, C 136. Soil samples for California Bearing Ratio analysis (CBR-value) - ASTM designation D 1883, were collected near projected roadways. Soil And Sediment Profile. - Test bits and borings were advanced to depths of 7.2 to 21.5 feet across the site. The developed soil profile represents only a generalized case. These following soils were not encountered in each exploration site, but instead represent a hypothesized profile: Pavement Section — Asphaltic concrete pavement was encountered in the northeast portion of the site.. Asphalt was approximately 2.5 inches thick. Aggregate base was noted below the asphaltic concrete pavement and at the grouted surface near test pits 1 and 3, These materials consist of brown, dry to slightly 11101St, medium dense to dense, gravel fill with 6-inch minus gravel. Base material was encountered to depths of approximately 2 to 3.5 feet where observed, Lean Clay (CL) -- Underlying the fill ntaterils (except in test pit 3 and at ground surface in test pit 4) is leach clay. This soil classifies as brown, slightly moist, and medium stiff to hard. This soil is present to depths of 1.7 to 6.5 feet. Cemented Sandy Silt (ML) and Silty Sand (SM) - Below the lean clay, light brown to brown, dry to slightly, weakly cemented, hard sandy silt and medium dense silty sand is present. These soils extend to depths of approximately 7 to 9 feet where encountered. Poorly Graded Sandy Gravel (GP) - Light brown, dry to moist, medium dense to very dense, poorly graded sandy gravel, with 8-inch minus well rounded cobbles was present in all test pits. This soil extended through termination depth. Walls of each exploration site were stable with the exception of those through the surf icial fill and through native gravels. Excavations through fill and granular soils will have a propensity for sloughing or caving. Soils Survey Review: A review of the United States Department of Agriculture, Sail Conservation Set -vice, Soil Survey of Ada County Area, Idaho, 1980, indicated the site can be characterized to include 2 soils types. These soils types consist of the Aerie Haplaquepts and Elijah silt loans soils. Specific soils characteristics defined by the USDA, have been Listed for each of these soils. Copyright' 2005 Materials'I-esting & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lernhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 # (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.com MATERIALS — ..� July 27, 2005 TeSTING & Page # 10 of 30 INSPECTION -.t Environmental Services J Gootechnics l'Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections 1\rrt1iscr%vr2\boisc\2')005 reporisi8tt0-9991b50885g`,b5Q885geote4ch.doe Aerie Haplaquepts: Moderately permeable, runoff is very slow, erosion hazard is slight. Elijah silt loath: Moderately slow perineables runoff is slow to medit1111, erosion hazard is slight to moderate. Environmental conce3''11s: This site is currently being renrediated for soil and groundwater contamination by a state consent order. Comment on these activities are beyond the scope this report. Soils obtained during on-sitc activities were not assessed for volatile organic compounds by portable photoionization detector. Samples obtained during our exploration activities exhibited some weak odors and discoloration typically associated with this type contamination. SITE HYDROLOGY General Notes: Existing surface drainage conditions are defined in the Description of Site. Information provided in this section is limited to observations made at the time of the investigation. Regional and/or local ordinances may require information beyond the scope of this report. Groundwater: Groundwater was not encountered within the site explored during the field investigation. However, recent borings and environmental monitoring wells on site show groundwater has been noted at depth as shallow as 9feet in the northern portion of the site. Soil moistures in the test pits were generally dry to slightly moist. Groundwater levels in the site vicinity are controlled' in large part by residential and commercial irrigation activity and canal leakage in the local area, and are likely at their maximum elevations daring the irrigation season. Estimation of seasonal groundwater fluctuation is problematic without regular monitoring. Based on the evidence of this investigation, periodic monitoring for environmental purposes, and the soils survey, it is unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during construction and is anticipated to remain at deptlis of greater than 6 feet below the ground surface. Copyright ' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mtiOrntiad.com * mmmti-id.corn IRWI ATE n I A 1. 5 July 27, 2005 gage # 11 ol'30 T'es'll'Ii+l INSPECrION J Environmental Serve .es ej Geotechnical Engineering `l Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections \\m6server2\boise12005 reportsA800-999kh5o885g\b5Q385-geotecti.doe Soil Infiltration Rates: Soil permeability is a measure of the ability of a liquid to move through a soil and was not tested in the field. In this report this parameter is Approximated by soil type and gradation. Of soils comprising the generalized soil profile for this study, lean clay and silt soils generally offer little permeability, with typical infiltration rates less than 2 inches per hour, though calcitim carbonate cementation encountered within cemented silt soils nifty reduce this value to heat' Zero. Silty sand sediments typically have permeability rates of approximately 4 to 12 inches per hour. Poorly graded sandy gravel soils typically exhibit infiltration values in excess of 24 inches per hour, and percolation testing is typically not required within these soils as a result of the free -draining nature of the gravel sediment. All infiltration facilities constructed on -site should be extended into native sandy gravel sediments. Excavation depths of tip to approximately 8 feet should be anticipated to expose sandy gravel soils. In addition, because of the high permeability, ASTM C 33 filter sand, or equivalent, should be incorporated into design of infiltration facilities. FOUNDATION, SLAB AND PAVEMENT DiscUSSION AND RE( Oitlit'IENDATIO\S General Notes: Various foundation types have been considered for support of the proposed building SttllctUres. Two requirements must be fulfilled in the design of foundations. 'First, the applied bearing stress must be less than the ultimate bearing capacity of foundation soils to maintain stability, and secondly, total and differential settlement must not exceed an amount that will produce adverse behavior of the superStruct ire. Allowable settlement is usually exceeded before bearing capacity considerations become important; thus, allowable bearing pressure is normally controlled by settlement considerations. Considering subsurface conditions and the proposed construction, it is recommended that the structure be founded upon conventional spread footings and contintious wall footings. Total settlements should not exceed 1 inch if the following design and construction recommendations are observed. Foundation Design Recommendations: On the basis of data obtained froth the site and test results from various laboratory tests perforniec1, MI'l recommends following guidelines be used for the net allowable soils bearing capacity. Copyright' 2005 Mi aterials'resting-& inspection, Inc.. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 ' (208) 376-4748 Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.com LMATMALS`� TESTING & I NSPeCTION July27, 2005 Page # 12 of 30 J Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing _]Special Inspections tyuriservcr2\boisc\2005 reports\800-999\b5U$85g',bSO885geotccli.doc ASTM D 1557 Net Allowable Soils Footing Depth - Wal reen's Subgrade Compaction Bearing Capacity Footings must bear on competent, native, Not Required for cemented sandy silt soils, gravel sediments, or Cemented Soil 2,500lbs/fl' compacted structural fill. Existing lean clay and fill soils must be completely removed from below 95% for Structural Fill all foundation elements. Excavation depths of tip to 6.5 feet should be anticipated for removal of Fill and clays. ASTM D 1557 Net Allowable Soils Footing Depth —Lar-e Retail Building Subgrade Compaction Bearing Capacity Footings trust bear on competent, native, grave Not Required for Native sediments, or compacted structural fill. Existing Soil 3,000lbs/fl' Fills (gear test lit 3) and organics mast be completely removed from below all foundation 95% for Structural Fill elements. Excavations of Lip to 2 feet should be anticipated to remove fill. Footings should be;, proportioned to meet the stated beaming capacity and/or the 2003 IBC minin Turn requirements. Total settlement should be limited to about I inch with differential settlement of approximately 1/2 inch. Objectionable soil types encountered at the bottom of footing excavations should be removed and replaced with structural fill. Excessively loose or soft areas that are encountered in the footing subgrade will require over -excavation and backfilling with structural fill. To minimize the effects of slight differential movement that may occur because of variations in character of supporting soils, and in seasonal moisture content, MTI recommends continuous footings be suitably reinforced to make them as rigid as possible. For frost protection, the bottom of external FiaotittP-s should be 24 inches below finished grade. Floor Slab -On -Grade: Walgreen's: Before the placing of concrete floors on site, or before floor supporting fill is placed, organic, loose or obviously compressive materials must be removed. The retraining subgrade should be treated in accordance with Earthwork guidelines and other Construction Considerations presented later- in this report. Areas of excessive yielding should be excavated and backfilled with structural fill. Uncontrolled, debris containing fill was encountered in this portion of the site. In floor slab areas, it is recommended that these fill soils be excavated to a sufficient dcoth to ext)ose competent, native soils, or to a minimum deml3 of 1.5 feet below finished subgrade and replaced with imported structural fill. Prior to placement of structural fill, the ex nosed subgrade should be compacted and Droof-rolled, with anv soft or loose areas excavated and replaced with structural fill. Therefore, the presence of a qualified soils technician during excavation is recommended to identify these soils in the field. Imported fill placed below the floor slab should meet the requirements for structural fill. All existing fill and fill placed beneath the floor slab must be compacted to a mininlurn 95% o f the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. Copyright' 2005 Materials'resting & lnspcction, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. Boise, ID 83709 , 208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 F-Mail mti@mti-icl.com * www.mti-id.com MATERIALS`' 3 TESTING & INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page # 13 of 30 .) Environmental Service J Geotechnical Engineering sJ Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections 14mtiserverT,boise\2 )05 reports\800-999\b5o585g',b5QS85geotech.doc Floor Slag -On -Grade: Large Retail Building Before the placing of concrete floors on site, or before- floor supporting fill is placed, organic, loose or obviously compressive materials niust be removed. The remaining subgrade should be treated in accordance with Farthivork guidelines and other Construction Considerations presented later in this report. Areas of excessive yielding should be excavated and backfilled with structural fill. Uncontrolled fill was encountered near test pit 3. In floor slab areas it is recommended that fill soils identified be excavated to a_sufficient depth to expose competent, Native soils, or to a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below finished subgrade and replaced withimported structural fill. Prior to placement of structural fill, the exposed subgrade should be commacted and proof -rolled, with any soft or loose areas excavated and replaced with structural fill. Therefore, the presence of a qualified soils technician during excavation Is recommended to identify these souls in the field. Imported fill placed below the floor slab should meet the requirements for structural fill. All existing fill and fill placed beneath the floor slab must be compacted to a minimum 95%u of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557, Floor Slab -On -Grade: General A frce draining granular mat (drainage fill course) should be provided below slabs on grade. This should be a minimum of four inches in thickness and properly compacted. The mat should consist of a sand and gravel mixture generally complying with ASTM D 1241 Type 1 Gradation A aggregate. No Less than 70% of this aggregate shall pass the % inch screen and no more than 10%0 of the aggregate shall pass the #200 screen. The maximum aggregate size shall be inches. A moisture retarder should be placed beneath floor slabs to minimize potential ground moisture effects on floor coverings. The granular nett shall be compacted to no less than 95% of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D 1557. Recommended Pavement Sections: MTI has made assumptions for traffic loading variables based on the character of the proposed construction. The Client should review these assumptions to make sure they reflect intended use and loading of pavements both now and in the future. MTI collected a sample of clear -surface soils for C.B.R. testing representative of soils to depths of 2 feet below existing ground Surface. This sample, consisting of lean clay collected from test pit 5, yielded a C.B.R. value of 4. Swell of 0.4% was detected for this sample. The following thicknesses are MINIMUM 'THICKNESSES for assured pavement function. Results of the test are graphically depicted in the Appendix. Copyright' 2005 Materiats'resting & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St, • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 , Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.coin • www.mt-id.com ..� July 27, 2005 MATERIALS Page #. 14 of30 TESTING J Fnyironmental Services -.1 Gootechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections 1Vtlt servcr2lboiscWO5 reports\800-999tb5o$85g%50885geotcch.doc Flexible Pavement Sections The AASHTO design method has been used to calculate the following pavement sections. Calculation sheets provided in the Appendix indicate the soils constant, traffic loading, traffic projections and material constants used to calculate the pavement sections. MTI recommends that materials used in the construction of Asphaltic Concrete Pavements meet requirements of the State of Idaho Transportation Department (iTD) Standard Specification for Highway Construction, Construction of the pavement section should be in accordance with these specifications and should adhere to guidelines recommended in the section on Construction Considerations. pavement Section Coni� Driveway Drivew sand i'arkitt 7, Truck Access Asphaltic Concrete 2.5 Inches 3.0 Inches Crushed Aggregate Base 4.0 inches 6.0 Inches Structural Sub -Base 10.0Inches t 14.0Inches Compacted Sttb Fade-1 Not Required Not Required Aggregate Base Material complying with ITD Standard Specifications for Highway Constructionsections 303 and 70 for aggregates. Strtuctural Subbase Material complying with the requirement for granular structural till in the Soils Report EXCEPT that maximum material diameter is no niore than 2/3 of the component thickness. l If poorly graded gavels are exposed in the sub -grade this may be compacted and tested in place of the compacted stab -lase. Common Pavement Section Construction Issues The subgrade upon which 'above pavement sections are to be constructed must be properly stripped:, compacted (if indicated), inspected and proof rolled. Proof rolling of subgrade soils should be accomplished` with a heavy rubber -tired fully loaded tandem axle dump track or equivalent. Existing identified fill on -site must demonstrate the indicated compaction prior to placing material in support of the pavement section. im'ri anticipates that pavement areas will be subject to moderate traffic. MT1 does not anticipate pumping material to become Evident during compaction, but; clays and silts near to and above optimum moisture contents, may tend to pump. Pumping or soft areas must be removed and replaced with structural fill. Fill material and compacted native subgrade soils (if required) in support of the pavement section as well as aggregates comprising the pavement section must be compacted to not less than 95% of maximum dry density indicated by ASTM D 698 for flexible pavements and by ASTM D 1557 for rigid pavements. If a material placed as a pavement section component cannot be tested by usual compaction testing methods, compaction of that material shall be approved by observed proof rolling. Minor deflections from proof rolling for flexible pavements are allowable; Deflections from proof rolling of rigid pavement support courses should not be visually detectable, Copyright ' 2005 Materials Testing R Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lernhi St. a Boise, 10 83709 (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail niti@mti-id.com e www.mti-W.com MATERIALS' TESTING % �J INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page # I of 30 a Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering :.J Construction Materials Testing J Special 111spections 1\m6server2tboise\2005 reportsl800.999\b50885g\bS0885geotecti.doc MTI recommends that rigid concrete pavement be provided for heavy garbage receptacle parking. This twill eliminate damage caused by the considerable load of containers transferred onto the small steel wheels and subsequently onto the asphaltic concrete. Rigid concrete pavement should consist of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) generally adhering to ITD specifications for Urban Concrete. PCCP shall be 6 inches thick on a 4 inch drainage fill course (see Floor Slab -on -Gracie sections should be reinforced with welded wire fabric, and control joints shall be on 12 foot centers or less. CCONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Earthwork: Recommend atioils in this report are based upon structural elements of the project being founded oil competent native cemented sandy silt soils or compacted structural fill. Structural areas should be stripped to an elevation that exposes these soil types. Excessively organic soils, deleterious materials, and/or disturbed soils generally undergo high volume changes when subjected to loads, which is detrimental to subgrade behavior in the area of pavements, floor slabs, structural fills, and foundations. Mature trees and thick grasses with associated root systems were noted at the time of our investigation. It is reconi ill elided that organic and/or disturbed soils, if encountered, be removed to depths of 1 foot (mininium), and wasted or stockpiled for later use. Stripping depths should be adjusted in the field to assure that the entire root zone and/or disturbed zone (plow depths) and/or topsail is removed, prior to placement and compaction of structural fill materials. Exact removal depths should be determined during grading operations by a qualified geotechnicai representative, and shell be based upon subgrade soil type, composition, and firmness or soil stability. Identified underground storage tanks (UST), below surface utilities, wells, or septic systems must be decommissioned, removed or abandoned as deeined necessary by governing Federal, State, and local agencies. Excavations developed as the result of such removal must be backfilled with structural fill materials as defined below, and in the above section oil Floor Slab -On -Grade. After existing subgrade soils are excavated to design grade, proper control of subgrade conditions (i.e., moisture content) and placement and compaction of new fill (if required) should be overseen by a representative of the soils engineer (MTI). Recommendations for structural fill presented within this report can be used to minimize volume changes and difT'erential settlements that are detrimental to the behavior of footings, pavements, and floor slabs. Sufficient density tests should be performed to properly monitor compaction. For structural fill beneath building Structures one in -place density test per lift for every 5,000 square feet is recommended. In parking and driveway areas this can be decreased to one test per lift for every 10,000 square feet. Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & inspection. Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. - Boise, ID 83709 - (208) 376-4748 - Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mb@niti-id.corn 9 www.mti-id.com cd MATERIALS TeSTING I NSPiECTION July 27, 2005 Page # 16 of 30 J Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections lkntiscryciTboise\2005 reports1800-999\b50885g,b50883geoteeh.doc Dry NVeathes If construction is to be conducted during what is considered "Dry" seasonal conditions, problems associated with soft soils may be avoided. However, shallots groundwater conditions, related to springtime runoff and/or late sunnier/early fall irrigation, may induce rutting subgrade soils. Problems may also arise because of lack of moisture in native and fill soils at time of placement. This will require addition of water to achieve near optimum moisture Levels. Low cohesive soils exposed in excavations may become friable, increasing chances of sloughing or caving. Measures to control excessive dust should be considered as part of the overall hcalth and safety management plan. Wet Weather: If construction is to be conducted during what is considered "Wet" seasonal conditions (commonly from raid -November to April), problems associated with soft soils must be considered as part of the construction plan. During this time of year, tine grained soils such as silts and clays will become unstable with increased moisture content, and etifentutrliy deform or rut. Additionally, constant low temperatures induce the possibility of drying soils to near optimum conditions. Frozen Subgrade Soils: Frozen subgrade soils must be allowed to thaw, or may be stripped prior to placement of structural fill materials or foundation elements. Frozen soils must be removed to depths that expose non -frozen soils and wasted or stockpiled for later use. These soils must be allowed to thaw and return to near optintitrn conditions }prior to use as structural fill. Structural Fill: Soils regarded as suitable for use as structural fill are those classified as GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, SM, and IML, in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM n 2487). The use of silty soils (USCS designation of GM, SM, and ML)as fill may be acceptable. However, these matcrials require very high moisture contents for compaction and require a long tinie to dry out if natural moisture contents are too high. Therefore these materials can be quite difficult to work with as rnaisturc content, lift thickness, and compactive effort becomes difficult to control. If silty soil is used lor- structural fill, lift thicknesses should not exceed 6 inches (loose), and fall material moisture must be closely monitored at both the working elevation and the elevations of materials already placed. Following placement, silty soils must be protected from degradation resulting from construction traffic or subsequent construction. Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 * Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mtiCgmti-id.com * www.mli-id..com MATERIALS ... July27, 2005 Page # 17 of 30 ck a d TESTING & iNSPECTION J Environmental Services J Geotechnical Enclineefirig J Construction Mator als `festin0 J Special Inspections Uit'iserver2toiscN2005 reports1800-999\b50885eNb508S51;eotcch.doc Recommended granular structural fill materials, those classified as GW, GP, SW, SP, should consist of a G inch minus select, clean, granular soil with no more than 30% oversize (greater than #/ inch) material and no more than 12% lines (less than AM) and placed in layers not to exceed 9 inches in thickness. Prior to placement of structural fill materials, surfaces must be prepared as outlined in the Construction -Considerations section. Structural fill material should be moisture -conditioned to achieve optini un moisture content prior to compaction. For structural fill below footings, areas of compacted backf ll must extend outside the perimeter of the footing for a distance equal to the thickness of fill between the bottom of foundation and underlying soils, or 5 feet, whichever is less. Each layer of structural fill must be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 (for rigid structures) or D 698 (for flexible pavements). The AS'TM D 1557 and D 698 test methods shall be used for samples containing up to 40% oversize particles Greater than 1/4 inch). If material contains more than 40% but less than 50% oversize particles, compaction of sill shall be confirmed by proof -rolling each lift with a 10-ton vibratory roller (or equivalent) ,nail the ma imunt dcnsltt} has been achieved. Density testing shall be performed after each proof -rolling pass until the in -place density test results indicate a drop (or no increase) in the dry density, defined as the maximum density or "break over" point. 'file number of required passes shall be used as the requirement oil the remainder of fill placement. Material shall contain sufficient fines to fill all void spaces, and shall not contain more than 50% oversize ])articles, Backfill: Backfill materials shall ascribe to the requirements of structural fill except that the maximum material size shall be 4 inches. In no case shall material greater than 2 Inches in diameter bear directly on structural e eineuts. Placing oversized material against rigid surfaces interferes with proper compaction. Backfill should be compacted in accordance with specifications for structural deter -pined that future settlement is not a concern, such as planter areas be compacted to a fire, and unyielding condition. Excavations. fill, except in those areas where it is . In nonstructural areas, backfill must Shallow excavations that do not exceed 4 feet in depth may be constructed with side slopes approaching vertical. Below this depth, it is recommended that slopes be constructed in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, section 1926, subpart P. Based on these regulations, on -site soils are classified as type "C" soil, and excavations within these soil should be constructed at a maximum slope of 1'/Z foot horizontal to l toot vertical (1'/2l-I:IV) for excavations Up to 20 feet in height. Excavations in excess of 20 feet will require additional analysis. Note that these slop! mangles are considered stable for short-term conditions only, and will not be stable for long-terni conditions. Copyright' 2005 Nlaterials Testing R Inspection, Inc, 7446 W. Lemhi St. * Boise, ID 83709 * (208) 376-4748 * Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@rnti-id,corn * www.mti-id.corn 05 MATERIALSPaJuly 278 o030 Page tt t8 of 30 TESTINr* & INSPECTION J Environmental Services J Cootechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections �\mtiservcrZboise12005 reports'%800-999Cb50885eb50885gcotech.doe Shallow, cemented fine grained soils (caliclie), encountered through some of the site, may cause difficulties during foundation development and utility placement. These soils typically extended through depths of 5.5 to 6.1 feet. For deep excavations, native granular soils cannot be expected to remain in position. These materials are prone to failure and may collapse, thereby undermining upper soils layers. this is especially trite when working at depths near the water table. Proper care must be taken to protect personnel and equipment. Luring our subsurface exploration, test pit sidewalls generally exhibited little indication of collapse, however, some caving of granular soils occurred. Care must be taken so that excavations are properly backfilled in accordance with procedures outlined in this report. eater and loose debris should be removed from these excavations, prior to placement of fill soils or concrete. Groundwater Control Groundwater has been encountered on the site, but is anticipated to be below the depth of construction. Excavations below the water table will require a dewatering program. It may be possible to discharge dewatering effluent to remote portions of the site or to a strategically located sump or pit, This will essentially recycle effluent, thus eliminating the need to enter into agreements with local drainage authorities. Should the scope of the proposed project change, MTI should be contacted to provide more detailed groundwater control measures. Special precautions may be required for control of surface runoff and subsurface seepage in general. It is recommended thatrunoff caused by wet weather be directed away from open excavations. On -site silty Or clayey soils can be expected to become soft and ptilnp if subjected to excessive traffic following periods of suet weather. Fonded surface water areas shouldd be drained to allow construction to take place through methods such astrenching, sloping, crowning grades, nightly smooth drum rolling, or installation of a French -drain system. Additionally, temporary or permanent driveway sections may be constructed should wet weather be forecast. GENERAL COIN`Ir1'IENTS When plans and specifications are complete, or if significant changes are made in the character or location of the proposed structure, consultation should be arranged as supplementary recommendations may be required. It is recommended that the service of a qualified geotechnical engineering firm be engaged to test and evaluate soils in footing excavations before placemment of concrete to determine if soils meet compaction requirements. Monitoring and testing should also be performed to verify that suitable materials are used for structural fill and that proper placement and compaction is performed, CopyTight ` 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc: 7446 W. Lemhi St. Boise, ID 83709 (208) 376.4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail niti@rnti-id.com • www,mti-id.com M-ATCRIALS July 27, 2005 Page# 19 of 30 TESTIN6 & INSPECTION -1 Environmental Services _j Geotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections %ntiserver2Nbois62005 1-cpor(s1800-9995b50885gtb50885gcolecli.doe REFERENCES American Society for Testing Materials, 1999, Standard Test Method ror Materials Finer than 75-purl (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing: C 117 - 95, 3 p. American Society for Testing Materials, 1999, Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates- C 136 - 96a, 5 1). Anicrican Society for Testing Materials, 1999, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM Designation: D 4318 - 86, 11 p. Collett, R,A., 1980, Soil Survey of Ada County Area, Idaho: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 327 p, Othberg, K.L. and Stanford, L.A., 1992, Geologic Map of the Boise Valley and adjoining area, Ada and Canyon Counties, Idaho: Idaho Geologic Mal) Series, scale 1:100,000. Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc, 7446 W. Lemhi St. * Boise, ID 83709 , (208) 376-4748 * Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mli@mti-id.com * www.inti-id.com July MATERIALS Page 427, 2005 20 of 30 TESTING & INSPECTION J Environmental Services _j Geolechnical Engineering j construction Materials Testing j Special Inspections 1\mfisctvcr21boisc12005 reports\800-999\b5OS85g\b5O8S5geotccli,doe APPENDIX GEOTECHNICAL GENERAL NOTES UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GEOTECHNICAL TEST PIT Locs GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOGS AASHTO PAVEMENT THICKNESS DE'SIGYN SHEETS CBR TEST DATA SITE MAP PLATES Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, tile. 7446 W. Lemhi St. , Boise, ID 83709 , (208) 376-4748 * Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail i-nti@mti-id.com * www.niti-id.com July27, 2005 Page # 21 of 30 f * Y a INSPECTION _1 Environmental Setvice:s J Geotechliicai Engineering J Gcrnstructiort Materials Tostiiig J Seecial Inspections V,mtiscr>'er2lboilc\20051-cporls'800-999':b50385g`.b5o885geotecti.doe GEOTEC HNICAL GENERAL NOTES SOIL PROPERTY SYNIBOLS N: Standard "N" penetration: Bloy,Nrs her foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30" on a 2" 0.1). SS Qu: Unconfined compressive strength, togs/ft2 Qp: Penetrometer value, unconfined coltipressive strength, toms/0 Qc: Cone Penetrometer value, unconfined compressive strength, pounds./in2 V Vane value, ultimate shearing strength, torts/ft2 M: Water content, % LL: Liquid Limit PI: Plasticity Index NP: Non -Plastic D: Natural dry density, ibs/ft3 WT: Apparent groundwater level (at time noted after coillpietion). DR] LI NG AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS; SS: Split -Spoor `- 1 3/8" 1.D., 2" O.D,, except where noted. S'I : Shelby Tube - 3" O D., except where noted., AU Auger Sample. DB:: Diamond Bit. CB: Carbide Bit. GS: Grab Sample. RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION Non-Coll+esive Soils Standard Penetration Resistance Coll esive Sails Standat d Penetration Resistance Very Loose <4 Very Soft <2 Loose 4-10 _ Soft: 2-4 Medium Dense 10-30 Firm Medium Stiff) 4-8 Dense, 30-50 Stiff 8-15 Very Dense >50 Very Stiff 15-30 [...Card >30 PARTICLE SIZE Boulders 12 in. 4 Coarse Sand 5 nlnl to 0,6 Illlll Silts 0.074 n1111 to 0,005111,11 Cobbles 12 in. to 3 in. lllediunl Sand 0_6-Ti ni to 0.2 it m Clays 0.005 nlll & Smaller Gravel 3 in. to S nvii 1'ille Sand 0.2 mm to 0.074 111111 Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. t.emhi St. • Boise. ID 83709 - (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 F-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.com MATE TESTING INSPECTION July 27. 2005 Page # 22 of 30 J Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections k%itiscrverZboisc'1005 repons\800-999tb508S5ebSo885gootech.doe Unified Soil Classification System ttMajor Symbol Soil Descriptions Divisions Wcll-graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fires Gravel G1r Poorly -graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines and Gravelly GP Silty gravels, Poorly -graded gravel -sand -silt MiXtUres Soils <50% GM Clayey gravels, Poorly -graded gravel -sand -clay mixtures coarse fraction basses: f#4 sieve GC Coarse Well -graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines Grained Sand SW Soils and Poorly -graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines <50% Sandy SP Silty sands, Poorly -graded sand -gravel -silt mixtures passes Soils #200 sieve >50% SN4 Clayey sands, Poorly -graded sand -gravel -clay mixtures coarse fraction passes A sieve SC Inorganic silts & very fine sands, silty or clayey Cole sands, clayey Silts ML silts Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy and Clays CL clays, silty clays, lean clays Organic silts and organic silt -clays of low plasticity Fine LL < 50 Grained OL Soils Inorganic silts, micaceous or diat©maccousfide sand or silt >50°!t Silts MH _ Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays, passes and #200 sieve Clays CH m_ Organic silts and clays of medium -to -high plasticity-` LL > 50 0171 Highly Organic Soils Peat, humus, hydric soils with high organic content PT J Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376.4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.com July MATERIALS;` Page 11 27, 2005 23 of 30 TESTING & INSPECTIC)IN _j Environmental Services -1 Geotechnical Engmeering J Construction Materials Testing j Special Inspections \\mtiscrvcr2\boise12005 i,epoils',SOO-999�b5OS85g,,b5o&85geotecli-doc GEOTE CHNICAL INVESTIGATION TEST PIT LOG Test Pit Log Y: TP-1 Date Advanced; 7/13/2005 Logged By: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. — Excavated By: Struckman's Backhoe Service Location: See Later Site Map Plates Depth to Water Table: Not Encountered Depth to Bottom Of Hole: 13.4 Feet Soil I.011"11, dense, 'ark w. (1131 Ligh tedilm Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc 7446 W. Lemhi St. * Boise, ID 83709 * (208) 376-4748 a Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail niti@niti-id.coni * www.mti-id.coni July 27, 2005 MATERIALS Page # 24 of 30 TeSTING fr INSPeCT10N .1 Environmental Services J Gootechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections Vnit iserver2%oise\2005 reports1,800-9991b50885g\b59885geoiccit,doe GEOTE CHN.ICAL INVESTIGATION TEST PIT LOG Test Pit Log ifs: TP-2 Date Advanced: 7/13/2005 Logged By: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. Excavated By: Struckman's Backhoe Service Location: See Later Site Map Plates Depth to Water Table: Not Encountered Depth to Bottom Of Hole: 8.1 Feet Copyright * 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, lnc. 7446 W. Lomhi St. * Boise, is 83709 , (208) 376-4748 # Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail tiiti@mti-id.com * www,mti-id.corn MATMALS►� Aw TeSTING & INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page# 25 of 30 J Environmental Services -) Geotechnical Engineering -1 Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections \Nmdserver2\bois02005 report i%00-9990 088 5g%50S 8 5 geotech.doe GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TEST PIT LOG Test Pit Log #. TP-3 Date Advanced: 7/13/2005 Logged By: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. Excavated By: Struckman's Backhoe Service Location: See Later Site Mal) Plates Depth to Water Table: Not Encountered Depth to Bottom Of Hole: 7.2 Feet ;CS Soil Lion ): B1.01.1,11, 5-hich GP): Light 01, medium well Copyright'2005 Materials Testing& Inspection, Inc, 7446 W, Lemhi St. * Boise, ID 83709 , (208) 376-4748 s Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.coni * www.mli-id.coni ` MATERIALS` TESTING & INSPECTION July 27, 2005 Page# 26 of 30 J Environmental Services J Geotechnical Engineering J Comhuction Materials Testitiq J Special Inspections \\mfiservet­2\boise\2005 report,,\800-999\b5O885g�b5O8859cotecil.cloc GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TEST PIT LOG Test Pit Log fl- TP-4 Date Advanced: 7/13/2005 Logged By: Jesse Barris, E.I.T. Excavated By: Struckman's Backhoe Service Location: See Later Site Map Plates Depth to Water Table: Not Encountered Depth to Bottom Of Hole: 8.4 Feet Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. - Boise, ID 83709 & (208) 376-4748 a Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail niti@i-nti-id.coni , www.mli-id.com MATERIALS TESTING �\ INSPECTION July 27, 2005' Page # 27 of 30 J Envitonmental Services J Ceotechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Tasting J Special inspections Ctaaatiservcr2lboiscl2005 repoets1800-999�,bSO885g\b50885geotech.doe GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TESTPIT LUG 'rest Pit Log #: TP-5 Date Advanced: 7/13/2005 Logged By: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. Excavated By: Struckman's Backhoe Service Location: See Later Site Map Plates Depth to Water Table Not Encountered Depth to Bottom Of Hole: 11.7 Feet Depth Field Description, iv/USCS Soil Sample Sample Depth Qp Lab Test Beet and Sediment Classification Tye From -To) 1D Lean Clay (CL): ;B)-own to rlrn•k 0.0-1.7 broivn, cby to slightly moist, hard. Bulk 0.5 to 1.0 Feet 4,5 A —Roots in the gjlper 8 inches. CBR Sanely Silt (ML): Light brown, 1.7-5.5 hani, weakij Cemented. 4.5+ Silty Sand (SM): Light brown, chy, 5.5-6.9 medium dense. Poorly Graded Gravel (GP): Light f ,9-11.7 brown, thy, medium dense to dense, with 8-inch minus well rounded cobbles. Lab Test ID m Sieve Anal psis - % #4 1 1/10 #40 #100 #200 A 7A 95 94 87 1 75 65A Laboratory Testing For Borings Lab Test 1D m P1 Sieve Analysis - % - #4 #10 #40 #100 #200 B-2 (2.5-4.0 feet) 23.7 37 10 91 85 68 56 49 B-5 (5.0-6.5 feet) 19.1 41 19 100 99 91 80 69;2 Copyright' 2005 Materials Tcsting & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. e Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376.4748 - Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com • www.mti-id.com FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO.: B_j TOTAL DEPTH: 21.5 Feet PROJECT INFORMATION DRILLING INFORMATION PROJECT: Overland Walgreens DRILLING CO.: Ilaz-:Tech Drilling SITE LOCATION. See Site Ilan METHOD OF DRILLING: )hollow Stern Adger 'J08 NO.: B50885g SAMPLING METHODS: Split Spoon !LOGGED BY ,Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. DATES DRILLED 30 June 2005 Symbol Key CStandard Penetration Test (SPT) Groundwater During Drlling .W..__. - .. . ._...._..�.... __ .. ... __ . .._. .. ............._ Depth ...... (Feet) Soil/Drilling Soil Description Blows „N„ — _m_bols 0 20 40 60 p ASPHALT: Black. .. — POORLY GRADED SANDY GRAVEL FILL (GP -FILL): Brown, [, slightlly moist, medium dense. ....... ... ...... .. r� LEAN CLAY (CL): Brown, slightly moist to moist, very stiff. /f fCLAYEY SAND (SC): Brown, slightly moist to moist, medium `f dense. X &5/14 i FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO.: B-2 TOTAL DEPTH: 9.5 Feet ........... PROJECT INFORMATION DRILLING INFORMATION ,SITE LOCATION: See Site Plan JOB NO.: B50885g LOGGED BY: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. DRILLING CO.: Haz-Tech Drilling METHOD OF DRILLING: Hollow Stem Anger SAMPLING METHODS: Split Spoon DATES DRILLED: 30 June 2005 . .......... Symbol Key Standard Penetration Test (SPT) -v-' Groundwater During Drillng ---- - --- . ............ . ........... . . ............... . ...... ...... .... ---- ....... . .. . . .... . .......... - ...... . ....... ................ . ... Depth (Feet) Soil/Drilling Soil Description Blows 0 20 40 0 POORLY GRADED SANDY GRAVEL FILL (GP -FILL): -Brown, slightily moist, medium dense. LEAN CLAY (CL): Dark brown, slightly moist, medium stiff. SILTY SAND (SM): Light brown, dry, very dense.Light brown, slightly moist, dense. 2/2/3 :5 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Light brown, slightly moist, very dense. > 38/44/ k.f NO"'o No groundwater encountered. ...mum Materials Testing & Inspection .................. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT: Overland Walgreens SITE LOCATION: See Site Plan ;JOB NO.: B50885g LOGGED BY: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ........... . . . . th (Feet) SoillDriiling Soil Description I!,P 0 j ASPHALT, Black \�O�®RLY GRADED �SANDY rG�,RRAAVIE=IL�FF:IIILIL�(1GP7-F—ICLj'.-6iow—nj > slightily moist, medium dense. LEAN CLAY (CL): Dark brown, slightly moist, medium stiff. i jjj SILTY SAND (SM): Light brown, slightly moist, dense to very dense. 5 ...... .. .................................. . ... . . . . . . . ................. . ............ ......... .... . ....... POORLY GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Light brown, slightly moist, dense to very dense. > No groundwater encountered. FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO.: B-3 TOTAL DEPTH: 21.5 Feet .......... . . . .. . . . . . .... . . . . . .... . DRILLING INFORMATION DRILLING CO.: Haz-Tech Drilling METHOD OF DRILLING: Hollow Stein Auger SAMPLING METHODS: Split Spoon DATES DRILLED: 30 June 2005 . . . ........ Symbol Key Groundwater During Drillng Blows "N" 0 20 40 60 3/213 Materials Testing & Inspection PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT: Overland Walgreens SITE LOCATION: See Site Plan JOB NO.: B50885g LOGGED BY: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T, . . . ......... . . . ............ ­11 . . ..... DRILLING CO.: Haz-Tech Drilling METHOD OF DRILLING: Hollow Stein Auger SAMPLING METHODS: Split Spoon DATES DRILLED: 30 Jnne 2005 Symbol Key Standard Penetration Test (SPT) W Groundwater During Drifing . ............. ....................... - .......... Depth (Feet) Soil/Drilling, Soil Description Blows Symbols 0 ASPHALT- Black. A :A__/Z: I F < POORLY GRADED SANDY GRAVEL FILL (GP -FILL): Brown,II 1 > slightIly moist, dense. 41 < LEAN CLAY (CL): Dark brown, slightly moist, medium stiff. IX. SILTY SAND (SM): Brown, slightly moist to moist, loose. 115/32/11 3/314 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Light brown, slightly x-xO, 1 moist, very dense.aQ k X . No groundwater encountered. 'N" 0 20 40 60 PROJECT: Overland Walgreens SITE LOCATION: See Site Plan JOB NO.: 1350885g LOGGED BY: Jesse Barrus, E.I.T. . ........ ......... .............. DRILLING INFORMATION DRILLING CO.: Haz-l'ech Drilling METHOD OF DRILLING: Hollow Stein Auger SAMPLING METHODS: Split Spoon DATES DRILLED: 30 June 2005 . ......... -- . . ....... -- .......... Symbol Key kStandard Penetration Test (SPT) '-W- Groundwater During Driling . ....................... . ......................... - ........ . .. ......... .... . ...... . . . ...... . . . . ................. . ..... . .._ ....._ ------- .. ........ Depth (Feet) Soil/Drilling Soil Description Blows f'N" Symbols 0 20 40 60 0 . . ............ . . ASPHALT`. Black. POORLY GRADED SANDY GRAVEL FILL (GP -FILL): Brown, slightily moist, medium dense. LEAN CLAY (CL): Dark brown, moist, medium stiff. SILTY SAND (SM): Light brown, slightly moist, dense. POORLY GRADED GRAVEL (GP): Light brown, slig htly moist, very dense. _A > 10-4 60(6 151 so (6-611) No groundwater encountered, 150(6 M ATE R IALS" Julys 27, 2005 TESTING &Page # 28 of0 INSPECTION J Environmental Services J Geotechnicai Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special inspections t\nitiserver1boise\2005 repoils\500-9991,h50885g\b50885gcotech.doc AASHTO PAVEMENT TI-IiCKNESS DESIGN PROCEDURES Pavement. Section Design Location. Proposed Retail Development, NoTruck Access Average Daily TrafficCounu 25 All lanes S Both Directions Design Life: 20 Years 1/6 of Traffic in Design Lane: 100% Terminal Seviceability Index (114): 2.5 Level of Reliability: 95', Subgrade C1311 Value: 4 Subgrade Ntr: 6,000 Calculation of Design 18 kip ESALs Daily Growth Load Design Traffic hate Factors IiSAL's Passenger Cars: 100 2.0% 0.0008 709 Buses: 0 2.0% 0.6806 0 Pancl & Pickup Trucks: 50 2.0% 0,0122 5,410 2 Agile, 6 "lire Trucks: 0 2.0% 0.1890 210 Concretc'Trucksi 1.0 2.0% 4.4900 39,731 Dump Trucks: 0 2.0% 3.6300 0 Tractor .Semi Trailer Trucks: 0 2.0% 2.3719 0 Double Trailer Trucks 0 2.0% 2.3187 0 1leavy Praetor Trailer ComboTrucks: 0 2 0% 2,9760 0 Avcragt Da11y'frat7ic in Design Lane: 151 Total Design Life 18 kip ESAL's: 46,060 Actual Log (ESAL's): 4.663 Trial S\: 2.61 Trial Log (ESAL's): 4.862 This must be equal to or greater than the Actual log (ESAL's) Pavement Section Design SN: 2.61 This Number must be equal to or greater than the trial SN Design Depth Structural Drainage Incites Coefficient Coefficient Asphaltic Concrete: 2.50 0.42 n'a AsphultTrcatetlBase: 0;00 US nla Cement Treated Base: 0.00 0.17 ttla Crushed Aggregate Base: 4,00 0.14 1.0 Pit Run AggregateSubbrade: I0A0 0A0 1.0 Special AggregateSubgrade: 0.00 0.09 0.9 Copyright ' 2005 N-laicrials Testing & Inspection, bfc. 7446 W. Leml i St. • Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com I www.inti-id.com MATERIALS— July 27, 2005 Page It 29 of 30 TESTING & INSPECTION J Environmental Services J Gcolechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections \\mtiserver2iboisc',2005 reports\800.9991b50885g`..b50885gcolcclt,doc AASHTO PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN PROCEDURES Paveulent Section Design Location: Proposed Retail Dcvelopment, Truck Access Average Daily "rraffic Count: Design Life: % of Traffc in Design Lane: Terminal Sevieeability index (Pty Level of Reliability: Subgrade C BR Value Passenger Cars: Buses: Panel & Pickup Trucks. 2 Axle, 6 "fire Trucks: Concrete Trucks: Dump 't"rueks: Tractor Serni Traikv Trucks`. Double Trailer "trucks ileavyTractor fraiterCotnba7°rucks: Average Daily Traffc in Design Lane: 150 All lanes & ISoth Directions 20 Years 100% 2.5 95 4 Subgrade r: 61000 Calculation of Design 18 kip FS ALs Daily Grmtlt Load Design Traffic Rate Factors ESAL's 26 2.0% 00008 194 4 2.0% 0,6806 24.144 30 2.0% 0,0122 3.246 3 2.0% 0.1890 5,028 3 2:00/4, 4,4800 119.193 1 2.0% 3,6300 32,193 2 2.0% 2.3719 42,071 5 2.0% 2,3187 102,917 1 2.0% 2.9760 20,393 75 Total Design Life 18 kip ESAL's: 355,269 Actual Log (ESAL's): 5;551' Trial Sti: 3:50 Trial Log (ESAL's): 5.632 'ibis must be equal to or greater than the Actual Log (FSAL's) Pavement Section Design SIN: 3,50 This Number must be equal to or greater than the trial 5h` Design Depth Structural Drainage Incites Coefficient Coefficient Asphaltic Concrete: 3.00 0.42 n'a Asphalt Trcuted tiatse: 0.00 0.25 Wu Cement Trebled Baser 000 0.17 nla Crushed Aggregate Base: 6,00 0,14 1.0 Pit Run Aggrcgale Subgrade: 14.00 0,10 1.0 Coarse Aggregate Base: 0.00 0.12 0.9 Copyright' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection. Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. * Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti@mti-id.com + www.mti-id.corn MATERIALS" July 27, 2005 Page 11 30 0l' 30 cw TESTING INSPECTION J Environmental Services J Geolechnical Engineering J Construction Materials Testing J Special Inspections \\mtiserverZboisc\2005 reports\800.999b50885g\bSO885geotech.doc C.B.R. DATA Source and Description: TP-5, 0.5%1,0' ^ Date Obtained: July 13, 2005 Sample ID: 3686 Souk Period 3 Swell: 72 Hours and 0.4% Sample Prepared: Moist: X Dry: Manual: X Mechanical: Sample Compaction: AASI1'l'0'r 99: ASTM D 698: X AASNT0 T 190: Mobod AS] NI D 1557: A Sample C'onclition: Soaked: X Unsoake d Sample #I Dial #I Depth #1 CBI't Reading Load Inches psi Value 0 0 0,000 u 2 31 0.025 10 4 49 0.050 16 7 78 0.071 26 9 97 0.100 32 3 12 125 0.125 42 14 144 0.150 48 1 ti 163 0.175 S4 18 182 0.200 61 4 22 220 0300 73 4 28 277 0,400 92 4 33 324 0:500 108 4 Sample #: 1 2 1 C BR Va1uc: 4 0 0 Dry Density 102,7 0 0 °fie Compaction: 99.8% 0-0% WXYa Corrected CBR Valuer 4 0 0 Load vs. Depth 120 IOD 8D Stress on 6D piston (psi) 40 20 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 penetration in lnehes Saiopte #1 Sauipt¢ #2 so plc A3 go ,Nlafinmm Dri Density: 102.9 Moisture Content Before C'ompacticui: 20.6 Moisture Confcnt After Compaction: 20,0 hloisturc Content Top I inch: 22.1 % Passing 314°: 100 Surcharge Amount (1b): 10.0 Ci3R & Compaction 5- 4 L 3 W 2 v l: 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% % Compaction Copyright ' 2005 Materials Testing & Inspection, Inc. 7446 W. Lemhi St. a Boise, ID 83709 • (208) 376-4748 • Fax (208) 322-6515 E-Mail mti fa mti-id,com • www.mti-id.com wiac•x-.s.sw- N ar %7! 7U1•r---- -T n�rr. Topographic Map _ Plate I Materials 7446 West t_emh► Street Overland Waigreens BOISE, IDAHO $3709 Overland and Meridian Roads Testing & P) (208) 376-4748 Meridian, ID F) (208) 322-6516 Drawing NO. 8508859 Inspection E-MAIL—mti@mtt.td.com July 11, 2005 Modified from USES by: JSB Bi(rop• b7up Meridian Quadrangle Sec. 24, UN, R1W RADIUS NOTICE REPORT 16-.1an-2007 Owners FILE NAME: Medina Owner Address Property Address: medina ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 3775 ADAMS ST GARDEN CITY, ID 83714-6447 Property Address: medina BOWDEN PROPERTIES LLC 400 W OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN, ID 83642-8105 Property Address: medina BOWDEN PROPERTIES LLC 400 W OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN, ID 83642-8105 Property Address: medina BROWN GARRETT N 1893 S RIPTIDE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 Property Address: medina BRYNER CLAUDE A 1915 S GULL COVE PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6574 Property Address: medina C & E INVESTMENTS LLC 1414 SUNRISE RIM RD BOISE, ID 83705-0000 Property Address: medina COTE JASON 182 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 Property Address: medina ELK RUN HOME OWNERS ASSOC P O BOX 44869 BOISE, ID 83711-0000 Property Address: medina 1 Owners FIRSTBANK NW CORP Property Address: FRITZEMEIER RANDY Property Address: HARRIS KIMBERLY HARRIS PHILLIP Property Address: HOWELL WILLIAM E Property Address: JACKSONS FOOD STORES INC Property Address: KERBER MICHAEL P KERBER ANGELA Property Address: KOPSITY ARLENE TRUST Property Address: L & M CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPMENT Property Address: LEWIS PHILIP T & LEWIS SANDRA H Property Address: LYONSKATHLEEN Property Address: Owner Address 13(K) 16TH AVE FL 2ND CLARKSTON. WA 99403-0000 medina 1896 S RIPTIDE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1870 S GULL COVE PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6574 medina P O BOX 676 JACKPOT, NV 89825-0000 medina P O BOX 610 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 medina 1894 S COVEY PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1560 BRENTWOOD CT WALNUT CREEK, CA 94595-0000 medina PO BOX 1604 IDAHO FALLS, ID 83403-0000 medina 1908 S RIPTIDE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6572 medina 1912 S COVEY PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6573 medina 2 Owners MARTHE RONALD A OWEN SUZIE M Property Address: MCCARTHY RUTH F Property Address: MCGRATH BRYAN J Property Address: MCMACKIN CINDY SUE Property Address: MERIDIAN HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC Property Address: MERIDIAN HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC Property Address: NICHOLSON THOMAS T Property Address: NICHOLSON THOMAS T Property Address: NICHOLSON THOMAS T Property Address: PARKER JENNIFER L Property Address: Owner Address 52 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1889 S GULL COVE PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6574 medina 168 W DAVENPORT MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1892 S GULL COVE PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6574 medina 1575 S MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1575 S MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina PO BOX 690 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0690 medina PO BOX 690 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0690 medina PO BOX 690 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0690 medina 196 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 3 Owners PEACH JULIE Property Address: PENA ROSE E Property Address: PORGES JUDITH H Property Address: RAMIREZ LAURA RAMIREZ LUCIANO Property Address: REITHER THAX Property Address: ROGERS WAYNE L ROGERS SUSAN M Property Address: SOUTHERN SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT INC Property Address: SOUTHERN SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT INC Property Address: SOUTHERN SPRINGS LLC Property Address: SOUTHERN SPRINGS LLC Property Address: Owner Address 1875 S RIPTIDE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 3149 N BOULDER CREEK PL MERIDIAN, ID 83646-7837 medina 74 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 230 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 98 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 214 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 1412 W IDAHO ST STE 110 BOISE, ID 83702-0000 medina 1412 W IDAHO ST STE 110 BOISE, ID 83702-0000 1412 W IDAHO ST BOISE, ID 83702-0000 1412 W IDAHO ST BOISE, ID 83702-0000 medina medina medina Owners SOUTHERN SPRINGS LLC Property Address: TOMLINSON DARRELL R TOMLINSON LINDA L Property Address: VAN AUKER RONALD W Property Address: VELDEVERE VICTOR F Property Address: WELAND KEN WELAND JOYCE Property Address: WEST BETTY JANE Property Address: Owner Address 1412 W IUAHU S'f BOISE,ID 83702-0000 medina 1817 S MARSH WOOD PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina 3084 E LANARK MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina PO BOX 7505 BOISE, ID 83707-0000 medina 112 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-6575 medina 134 W DAVENPORT DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 medina m FS-T Ln rl_i r D r i G) y m � (a to = TZ mm ca rn r owe z (n (D c: oZ 1 c� 557 8 CITY OFY ? �YIG�l�ll 33 E. Idaho Ave. y Meridian, ID 83642 FH TFR o TREASURE V n(�Y SINCE 1903 Or.G F P J b��ybr t SPE � F5 a d a Q U ` Zo cc � C O `n C� p M O Z p cU 'IT co 21 a L , W W a) CJ cm M N �-- 't W — s UTY.OF C�Wcrld4n lk 33 E. Idaho Ave. �y Meridian, ID 83642 e Ce~TeR' #� TREASURE ?3� Date d Applicant Address rr'�/C, uT i L [ Phone •DESCRIPTION• CAS �CIHECK # NAME ON CHECK IF DIFFERENT THAN APPLICANT _ 1 I I I I I I I I I • I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I i i 1 I I PAYMENT DOES NOT INDICATE ACCEPTANCE APPLICATION TAX I q ! 9 516 Received By TOTAL I I� 55748 13