HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-01-22 ACHD Development Services Department
ACHD
Project/File: Ambles Run/ MPP21-0001/ H-2020-0124
This is an annexation and rezoning application to annex 2.88 acres with R-2 zoning
and a preliminary plat application to develop 6 single-family lots on 2.88 acres.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: East of Locust Grove Road and Dunwoody Vicinity Map
Staff Approval: January 21 2021h
Applicant: Michael MillerR ' ".
Homefound Groups
1308 N. 12th Street ��� > E ��►
taw,,: _•
Boise, ID 83702
Representative: Same as above karl-1-1111
r
rr
Staff Contact: Paige Bankhead, E.I.Phone: 387-6293 Al
E-mail: pbankheadC@achdidaho.org '
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of an annexation and rezoning
application to annex 2.88 acres with R-2 zoning and a preliminary plat application to develop 6
single-family lots on 2.88 acres.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction I Land Use Zoning
North Rural Urban Transition (Ada County) RUT
South Medium-Low Density Residential R-4
East Rural Urban Transition Ada Count RUT
West Rural Urban Transition (Ada County) RUT
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site.
5. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 0.06 centerline miles of new public
road.
6. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building
permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
7. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP):
1 Ambles Run/
M PP21-0001/ H-2020-0124
• Locust Grove Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from McMillan Road to
Chinden Boulevard (US-20/26) between 2036 and 2040.
8. Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan: ACHD's Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan (BMP) was
adopted by the ACHD Commission in May of 2009 and was update in 2018. The plan seeks to
implement the Planned Bicycle Network to support bicycling as a viable transportation option for
Ada County residents with a wide range of ages and abilities, maintain bicycle routes in a state of
good repair in order to ensure they are consistently available for use, promote awareness of existing
bicycle routes and features and support encouragement programs and to facilitate coordination and
cooperation among local jurisdictions in implementing the Roadways to Bikeways Plan
recommendations.
• The BMP does not identify any facilities within the site.
• Locust Grove Road is listed in the BMP as a Level 3 facility that will be constructed as part
of a future ACHD project.
• Strauss Drive is listed in the BMP as a Level 1 facility. This roadway is located off-site and
is not required to be improved by the applicant.
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 57 additional vehicle trips per day (0
existing); 6 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (0 existing), based on the Institute
of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10t" edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH)
Functional PM Peak PM Peak
Roadway Frontage Classification Hour Hour Level
Traffic Count of Service
Locust Grove Road 0-feet Minor Arterial 340 Better than
"D„
Chopin Avenue 0-feet Local NA NA
* Acceptable level of service for a two-lane principal arterial is "E" (690 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
• The average daily traffic count for Locust Grove Road south of Chinden Boulevard was 7,706
on 01/31/2018.
• ACHD does not have traffic counts for Chopin Avenue.
C. Findings for Consideration
1. Chopin Avenue
a. Existing Conditions: There are no local roadways within the site. There is one local street,
Chopin Avenue, that stubs to the site's south property line.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
2 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths
for all local streets shall generally not be less than 47-feet wide and that the standard street
section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb).
Standard Urban Local Street-33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District
Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 33-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-
curb)for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section
shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall
typically be constructed within 47-feet of right-of-way.
For the City of Kuna and City of Star: Unless otherwise approved by Kuna or Star, the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any
buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and
minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within
50-feet of right-of-way.
Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a
street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development
shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation
of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following:
• Reduces vehicle miles traveled.
• Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.
• Increases access for emergency services.
• Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system.
• Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries.
• Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks,
neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc.
• Promotes orderly development.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local
jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway
strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of
the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Cul-de-sac Streets Policy: District policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to
provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the
emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may
be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29-foot street section is constructed around the
3 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard
AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from
the appropriate fire department for this design element.
The District will consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case
basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written
approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is
located.
Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are
permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to
accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided:
• The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD.
• The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum
distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a
maximum width of 30-feet.
• At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median
width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and
tapers.
• The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement
if landscaping is to be placed within these medians.
• The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer
including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for
maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions.
• Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters
shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to extend Chopin Avenue into the site and
construct it as a 36-foot wide local street section with rolled curb, gutter, 8-foot wide planter
strips within 50-feet of right-of-way and 4-foot wide concrete sidewalks within a sidewalk
easement. The applicant has proposed to construct Chopin Avenue to stub to the site's north
property and construct a cul-de-sac at the terminus of the stub street.
The applicant has proposed to construct the cul-de-sac with a radius of 48-feet. The applicant
has also proposed to construct a landscaped island within the cul-de-sac.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to extend Chopin Avenue into
the site and stub it to the site's north property line and construct a cul-de-sac meets District
Policy and should be approved, as proposed. If the applicant chooses to construct a landscaped
island within the cul-de-sac, the landscape island should be platted as right-of-way owned by
ACHD. The applicant or homeowner's association should enter into a license agreement with
ACHD for any landscaping proposed to be located within the landscape island.
The applicant proposal to construct Chopin Avenue as a 36-foot wide local street section with
4-foot wide sidewalks does not meet the District's Standard Urban Local Street and Sidewalk
Policies which requires local streets in the City of Meridian to be constructed as a 33-foot wide
street section with minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks and should not be approved as
proposed.
The applicant should be required to construct Chopin Avenue as a 33-foot wide local street
section with rolled curb, gutter and minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within a minimum
of 47-feet of right-of-way. The applicant's proposal to construct 8-foot wide planter strips meets
4 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. For detached sidewalks located outside
of the right-of-way, the right-of-way may be reduced to extend 2-feet behind the back of curb
with a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind
the back of sidewalk.
2. Stub Streets
a. Existing Conditions: There is one local street, Chopin Avenue, that stubs to the site's south
property line.
b. Policy:
Stub Street Policy: District policy 7207.2.4.3 (local) states that stub streets will be required to
provide circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with
the requirements described in Section 7207.2.4 (local), except a temporary cul-de-sac will not
be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at
the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE
FUTURE."
In addition, stub streets must meet the following conditions:
• A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the nearest street intersection within the
proposed development and drain surface water towards that intersection; unless an
alternative storm drain system is approved by the District.
• The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will
remain free of obstructions.
Temporary Dead End Streets Policy: District policy 7207.2.4.4 (local) requires that the design
and construction for cul-de-sac streets shall apply to temporary dead end streets. The
temporary cul-de-sac shall be paved and shall be the dimensional requirements of a standard
cul-de-sac. The developer shall grant a temporary turnaround easement to the District for those
portions of the cul-de-sac which extend beyond the dedicated street right-of-way. In the
instance where a temporary easement extends onto a buildable lot, the entire lot shall be
encumbered by the easement and identified on the plat as a non-buildable lot until the street is
extended.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to extend Chopin Avenue into the site and
stub it to the site's north property line located approximately 185-feet east of the site's west
property line. The applicant has also proposed to construct a cul-de-sac at the terminus of the
stub street.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed.
The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating that,
"THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
3. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
4. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm
drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle
at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height
5 Ambles Run/
M PP21-0001/ H-2020-0124
restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop
signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District
requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Extend Chopin Avenue into the site and construct Chopin Avenue to stub to the site's north property
line 185-feet east of the site's west property line, as proposed.
2. Construct Chopin Avenue as a 33-foot wide local street section with rolled curb, gutter, an 8-foot
wide planter strip and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within a minimum of 47-feet of right-of-way.
For detached sidewalks located outside of the right-of-way, provide a permanent right-of-way
easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind the back of sidewalk.
3. Construct a cul-de-sac at the terminus of the stub street with a minimum radius of 45-feet and install
a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE
FUTURE."
4. If the applicant chooses to construct a landscaped island within the cul-de-sac, plat the landscape
island as right-of-way owned by ACHD. The applicant or homeowner's association should enter
into a license agreement with ACHD for any landscaping proposed to be located within the
landscape island.
5. Submit civil plans to ACHD Development Services for review and approval. The impact fee
assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
6. Payment of impact fees is due prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all
easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way
(including all easements).
2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD
right-of-way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-
compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA
compliance to District Development Review staff for review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number)for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190
in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled)are compromised during any phase of construction.
6 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards
and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards
unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and
certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of
any change from ACHD.
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan
and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in
the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant
to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a
waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G. Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines OR Appeal Guidelines
7 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
VICINITY MAP
i 1)6
W MIN
1 F
0
1+ .4 Yi' d 'f-
t ii.uk�11 r=t
EM,
8 Ambles Run/
M PP21-0001/ H-2020-0124
SITE PLAN
Q� ———
�.�� •. ' 00— — 1871�L----------------7
+
I3 Rae.a s
f l 1�$F l 1 .1 1 18365 SF w
f 0.37 F_0' 0 36
1 +
FL
I I 1 � z•1' } I �,
------- -°_ O o r}----------------7
T. l' 1
I I v
PROPOSED SEEPAGE
1 1 TKNCH
1 1 I I laIF LU
179
0241$F I 19386 SF M�
0-42 I
b �
I 3so I I I
I �
SIM, I I BLOCK 1 �
L--- BLOCK 2 ---��— RIGHT OF H'AY! L---------_
— ———J
=i —
Er
1 _
---- I MN.
I 1
I B" SEKR I mm. X'0' 11111
8' SEWER 41A1h4 I
} iI ICD
15409 SFo.az
179 5F TO aE PLED
DrrCH 1-x
I o#T 1 PRROPUSE nWEF-WEB I
I I
:�-_- ut.....-- -
_ -ter,._.....
— —
ri
IR
xa }
9 Ambles Run/
M PP21-0001/ H-2020-0124
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and
road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5)working days upon notification of required right of way improvements
by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and
the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to,
project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any
portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility
owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the
developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their
project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or
negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter
of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review
is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated
date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be
pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a
preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be
completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise
agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to:50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com
for e-mail notification information.
10 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
❑Send a"No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
❑Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed by Applicant:
❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD,then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services(ACHD)for ANY work in the right-of-way,
including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request"form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
❑Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application"to ACHD Construction—Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
❑ Sediment&Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion &Sediment Control Narrative&Plan, done
by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
❑ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
❑ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con.
11 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of
the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the
Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of
the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily
and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
and Clerk of the District, which must be filed within ten (10)working days from the date of
the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the
decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number
and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the
provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and
shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not
consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider
and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any
modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the
Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services
Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice
of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior
to the hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
12 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on
by all Commissioners present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no
later than 11:00 a.m. 2 days prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting
following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of
the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next
scheduled regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth
new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that
has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of
fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at
the meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to
ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which
the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter
at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
13 Ambles Run/
M P P21-0001/ H-2020-0124