HomeMy WebLinkAboutBabbitt.AZSTAFF REPORT Hearing Date: 12/7/06
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: C. Caleb Hood
Current Planning Manager
Meridian Planning Department
208-884-5533
SUBJECT: Babbitt Annexation
AZ-06-055
Annexation and Zoning of 1.12 acres from RUT (Ada County) to
R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential).
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, City of Meridian Public Works Department, has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) to R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) for 1.12 acres of property currently zoned
RUT in Ada County. The site is located on the east side of Locust Grove Road, approximately 1/3 mile north of Victory Road. This site is currently improved with one single-family residential
building and accessory building. The subject request for annexation is based upon the fact that the well that services this home has dried up and the home needs to be hooked up to City
water. Gene and Freda Babbitt have signed an affidavit of legal interest, granting the Public Works Department the authority to submit the subject application on their behalf. This
property is within the City’s Area of Impact and Urban Service Planning Area.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff has provided detailed analysis and recommends that the subject application be approved. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed Babbitt Annexation (AZ-06-055) as detailed
in this report.
3. PROPOSED MOTION (to be considered after the public hearing)
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of File Number AZ-06-055 as presented in the staff report for the hearing
date of December 7, 2006, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number AZ-06-055 as presented during the hearing on December 7, 2006:
(Please state specific reasons for denial of the annexation request)
Continuance
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number AZ-06-055 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s):
(State specific reason(s) for continuance)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location: 2570 S. Locust Grove Road / Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East
b. Owner:
Gene & Freda Babbitt
2570 S. Locust Grove Road
Meridian, ID 83642
c. Applicant/Representative: Karie Glen, Meridian Public Works Department
d. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County)
e. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential
f. Description of Applicant's Request: Request for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) to R-4 for 1.12 acres of property currently zoned RUT in Ada County.
g. Applicant's Statement/Justification: In March of 1994 when Los Alamitos Subdivision public hearing was held we thought that the addition of our farm property to the city included
our home site. Later we discovered that we were not included and would need to be annexed separately. The City of Meridian is contiguous to and extends in every direction from our property.
We are now out of water and are in dire need of water to live in our home (see letter from Gene & Freda Babbitt, dated October 15, 2006 for more information.)
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will in fact constitute an annexation as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 5, a public hearing
is required before the City Council on this matter.
b. Newspaper notifications published on: November 20 and December 4, 2006
c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: November 9, 2006
d. Applicant posted notice on site by: November 27, 2006
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): There is an existing home and other outbuildings on the subject site.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: Over the past several years, this area has transformed from rural to urban.
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: Residential, Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R-4
2. East: Residential, Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R-4
3. South: Single-family home on large parcel, zoned RUT (Ada County)
4. West: Residential, Salmon Rapids Subdivision, zoned R-4
d. History of Previous Actions: In 1994 the City Council approved the annexation and zoning of the Los Alamitos development. The subject parcel was not included within the boundaries
of the development, it was an out parcel.
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities:
1. Public Works:
Location of sewer: Residence is currently connected to City sewer.
Location of water: Residence is currently connected to City Water.
Issues or concerns: None. The sewer and water hook-up fees for the existing residence have already been paid.
2. Vegetation: There are some existing trees on this site that should be protected or mitigated for, when this property develops.
3. Floodplain: N/A
4. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: All irrigation ditches, laterals and canals should be tiled, when this property develops.
5. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards associated with this property.
6. Proposed Zoning: R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential)
7. Size of Property: 1.12 acres
f. Subdivision Plat Information: The applicant has not submitted a preliminary plat, or a concept plan for this property, with the subject annexation application. Staff believes that
the applicant does not have any intention of further developing this property at anytime in the future. Further, once ACHD acquires right-of-way for Locust Grove Road from this site,
there will be very little “useable” area on this site for redevelopment. Staff believes that the subject use on this site, a single-family home, will continue as is, for the foreseeable
future.
g. Landscaping:
1. Width of street buffer(s): Per City Code, a 25-foot wide landscape street buffer is required adjacent to Locust Grove Road, an arterial roadway, when this property re-develops (UDC
11-2A-4).
2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: N/A
h. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: As mentioned above, the applicant is not proposing to develop/plat this property at this time. Access to this site is provided from Locust
Grove Road, and not Time Zone Drive. If and when this property re-develops in the future, Staff will recommend that direct lot access to Locust Grove Road be restricted/prohibited.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On November 17, 2006 a joint agency and departments meeting was held with service providers in this area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian
Parks Department, Meridian Public Works Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. These agencies were unable to comment as there was no conceptual design provided. No comments
are included with this report as all uses will require at minimum a certificate of zoning compliance where the agencies will have the opportunity to condition specific uses.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
This property is designated “Medium Density Residential” on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. Medium density residential areas are anticipated to contain single family residences
at densities from three to eight dwelling units per acre (see Page 99 of the Comprehensive Plan.) Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any verbal or written testimony
that may be provided at the public hearing when determining the most appropriate zone for this property.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the subject property (staff analysis in italics below policy):
Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services. (Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1)
When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the lands
proposed to be annexed in the following manner:
Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer’s expense.
The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District. Once annexed the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire Department,
who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire Department.
The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff’s Office. Once annexed the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD).
The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD). This service will not change.
The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District #2. This service will not change.
The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a result of
the subject annexation.
Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department, the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian Wastewater
Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing Services, and Sanitary Services Company.
Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels. (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1)
The applicant is not proposing any new land use for this property. Staff believes that the existing single-family home is compatible with the other residences in this area.
Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, and high-density single family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing
the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10)
The subject application includes a request for the R-4 zoning designation. Except for one property to the south currently zoned RUT in Ada County, all of the adjacent properties are
currently zoned R-4. Staff finds that the requested zoning designation is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the zoning of other properties in this vicinity,
and further enhances the variety of zoning designations south of the interstate.
Staff finds that the proposed R-4 zoning designation is generally harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
9. ZONING ORDINANCE
a. Zoning Schedule of Use Control: UDC 11-2A-2 lists single-family dwellings as a Permitted
Use in the R-4 zone.
b. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection
to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per
acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
1. AZ Application: As mentioned above, the subject property is proposed for annexation because the well serving the existing home has dried up and the residence needs to be hooked
up to city services. There is no additional development planned for this property.
Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan, and what is happening in this area, Staff believes that the requested R-4 zone is appropriate for this property.
Please see Exhibit B for detailed analysis of the required facts and findings.
The annexation legal description submitted with the application (stamped on October 20, 2006 by Glenn K. Bennett, PLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary
of the City of Meridian.
Special Considerations:
Development Agreement: UDC 11-5B-3D2 and Idaho Code § 65-6711A provides the City the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with the City that
may require some written commitment for all future uses. In anticipation of this application being approved, the applicant has already paid the required sewer and water hook-up fees
for the existing residence. There are no additional requirements that staff can think of regarding annexing this property. Therefore, Staff believes that a DA is not necessary in this
instance. All future uses on this property should not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,
property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors, and should be constructed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances
in effect at the time of development.
b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the subject property be annexed into the City with an R-4 zoning designation.
11. EXHIBITS
A. Legal Description
B. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
A. Legal Description
B. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Annexation Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or
rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan;
The applicant is proposing to zone all of the subject property to R-4. Staff finds that the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive
plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report.
2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement;
No development is proposed concurrent with the zoning map amendment. Staff finds that future development of this property should comply with the established regulations and purpose
statement of the R-4 zone.
3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;
Staff finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any oral or
written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding.
4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited
to, school districts; and,
Staff finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site.
The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
Staff finds that the annexation and zoning of this property to R-4 would be in the best interest of the City.