Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments i MAYOR Tammy de Weerd - ::"'"" "I e:M'e ;;dl~~~:'¿"\ ~ IDAHO ~I A jl ~ ~' (, "~'J¡ . ',¡ ~~ , $'.CE 11903 CITY HALL (208) 888-4433 - Fax 887-4813 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Chris1ine Donnell Shaull Wardle Charles M - Rountree PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-22lJ - Fax 898-9551 LEGAL OEP ARTMENT (208) 898-5506 - Fax 884-8423 MEMORANDUM: Transmittal Date: October 18, 2005 Hearing Date: October 25, 2005 To: Mayor and City Council , ¡", ", ';,"¡I};'" <, ¡" ,"" ',' . From: Joe Guenther, Associate City Planner .., '; : ': !'òi')' .. I L,i,Ai" Subject: Reduction in Platting Requirements Application '~:'--" ;5ì~~~î~~t";'#';':.:~ Request for a Reduction in Platting Requirements for a Short Plat to create one (1) 1.01 acre parcel and one (1) 2.23 acre parcel in an approved I-L zone by Ronald and Linda Yanke. (File No. RP-O5-003). Staff has reviewed the above referenced submittal and offers the following comments and conditions. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Linda Yanke, has submitted a Reduction in Platting (RP) application requesting a reduction to the platting requirements to create one (1) 1.01 acre parcel and one (1) 2.23 acre parcel in an approved I-L zone. The subject parcel is a parcel of record as evidenced by the recorded deed dated October 15, 1981. The subject parcel is not part of a recorded subdivision. A Record of Survey (ROS) has been submitted showing how the parcel will be divided. Parcel A of the submitted ROS is 1.010 acres and Parcel B of the ROS is 2.226 acres in size. Future development must comply with the Uniform Development Code adopted September 15, 2005. The subject property is located north of Franklin Road and approximately Ih mile east of Linder Road. The owner of the property is Ronald and Linda Yanke; Linda Yanke has submitted notarized consent for the subject application. STAFF ANALYSIS This request was submitted prior to the adoption of the UDc. In June, 2004, the Planning Department established a new policy and procedure regarding re-subdivisions. This decision was based on MCC 12-3-1.B. which states the following: RP-O5-003 T enM i leDeveiopmentRP .doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: October 25, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Re-Subdivision: Notwithstanding the definition of "subdivision" contained in Section 11-2-2 of this Code, where an applicant desires to subdivide an existing lot which is located in an existing subdivision which has been previously recorded and the required improvements made thereon, he may do so without going through the entire platting procedure required by this Title. He shall, however, submit an application for re- subdivision showing the existing lot and how the lot is proposed to be re-subdivided. The City shall then determine what requirements of this Title shall be complied with by the applicant. The City may require full compliance if deemed necessary. The provisions of this subsection pertaining to the reduction in platting requirements of certain parcels may apply to previously unplatted and unsubdivided ground upon application to the City Council. (Ord. 456, 9-3-1985) The Planning Director, City Engineer, and City Attorney determined that this ordinance allows property owners to request a re-subdivision of property if the proposed division meets the following criteria: 1. If the property is within a recorded subdivision, a Lot Line Adjustment application must be submitted and may be approved at staff level. If the property is unplatted, a miscellaneous application (reduction in platting requirements) must be submitted and heard by the City Council. If the miscellaneous/reduction in platting requirements application is approved by City Council, a Lot Line Adjustment application must be submitted. For either platted or unplatted land, the applicant must provide drawings that show a) the existing parcel and the proposed split, b) any and all existing and proposed improvements within or adjoining the property, c) proposed sewer connection and profiles, and d) any other information deemed as appropriate or necessary by the City Engineer and/or Planning Director. Both parcels that result from the split must meet the minimum yard requirements of the applicable zone per MCC 11-9-1. Applications for re-subdivisions of property will only be considered for property zoned as commercial and/or industrial. Residentially zoned land is not eligible. Properties would be limited to a one-time split under these provisions. Platting requirements for condominium plats may also be considered under these provisions where the condominium plat only affects ownership and does not result in additional development of the property. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Staff has confirmed that the two parcels to be created by this division meet the minimum standards for the approved 1- L zone. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant must comply with all subdivision improvements as required by MCC 12-5-2. 2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, the applicant shall submit a recorded copy ofthe Record of Survey signed by the City Engineer. RP-O5-003 Yanke, Linda.RP.doc Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: October 25, 2005 Page 3 of3 3. All future uses within Parcels A and B shall be required to comply with the use standards in effect at such time. All future development on both Parcels A and B must comply with standards in effect at time of application regarding building setbacks, lot coverage, and height restrictions. Applicant shall comply with all improvements as required by Ada County Highway District. Show instrument number of the access easement for the Meridian City W ell lot on the record of survey prior to acceptance by City Engineer. 4. 5. 6. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this application with the above noted conditions. RP-O5-003 Yanke, Linda.RP.doc