P&Z Item Packet
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
1.
RolI..c:all Attendance:
1--
()
Keíth Borup
Davíd Moe
X Wendy Newton-Huckabay
X Míchael Rohm
Chaírman Davíd Zaremba
'f
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
"Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Planning and Zoning Commission are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter. "
3.
Public Hearing: Application for an Ordinance for a New Title 11
Unified Development Code replacíng I repealíng Títle 11 Zoníng
ReguJatíons and Títle 12 Subdívísíon Development of the Merídían Cíty
Code: L 0 1'\ Ii I\Vt; i1J Afrl \ '& 'J ) )OOS-
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting Agenda - April 18, 2005 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Jessíca Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tara Green [greent@meridiancity.org]
Monday, April 25, 20059:13 AM
Jessica Johnson
FW: UDC Hearing
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 2005
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.orgJ
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:07 AM
To: 'Tara Green'; 'Will Berg'
Subject: FW: DOC Hearing
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Tara/Will,
Please make copies of this e-mail for the P&Z Commissioners.
Thank you,
Anna
Anna Borchers Canning
City of Meridian Planning Director
-----Original Message-----
From: David Turnbull [mailtO:dturnbull@brightoncorp.comJ
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 8:16 AM
To: Anna Canning
Subject: RE: DOC Hearing
Anna:
Dntil there has been a more adequate period to consider this proposed addition to the DOC
I don't think it is prudent to take it before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Having
distributed it only a couple of days ago, I don't think you'll get the kind of thorough
review it needs and the Commission would essentially be bipassed on this issue. I will be
out of town for the next two weeks but have forwarded this to my staff and transportation
consultants for review.
After a more thorough reading I'm convinced there is at a minimum some ambiguity in the
standards and quite possibly some regulatory takings issues. While I appreciate the need
to work with ITD to preserve efficient transportation corridors, I also think Meridian
needs to consider further what it's own best interests are. For instance, I think this
proposal would kill any potential employment centers and any retail services in state
highway areas. You would essentially get vast stretches of residential platting. I don't
think that is in the best interest of the City. I also think the City needs to protect
the rights of its property owners by not allowing unwarranted regulations.
So, I'm asking you again to please pull this from consideration on tomorrow night's P&Z
Commission Hearing and bring it back after it has had an appropriate review process.
Thanks.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.orgJ
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:45 PM
To: Becky McKay; Brad Hawkins-Clark; Brad Miller; David McKinnon; David
Kushlan; freckleb@meridiancity.org; J. Cornel Larson; John Forsythe; P.
Bailey; Steve Siddoway; Tammy de Weerd
Turnbull; Diane
E. David A.
1
Cc: 'Sue Sullivan'; 'Sue Sullivan'
Subject: FW: DOC Hearing
Dear PIG,
In coordination with Sue Sullivan with ITD,
development along State Highways. David has
the proposed text for your review.
Anna
we developed some standards regarding
some concerns as noted below. I am forwarding
Anna Borchers Canning
City of Meridian Planning Director
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.orgJ
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:43 PM
To: 'David Turnbull'
Cc: 'Bill Nary'; 'Ted Baird'
Subject: RE: DOC Hearing
Dave,
If you can get more specific comments, I will bring them up to the Planning Commission. I
will forward this e-mail along with the proposed standards to the PIG.
Anna
Anna Borchers Canning
City of Meridian Planning Director
-----Original Message-----
From: David Turnbull [mailto:dturnbull@brightoncorp.comJ
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:36 PM
To: Anna Canning
Cc: allens@meridiancity.org; Barb Shiffer; Brad Hawkins-Clark; hoodc@meridiancity.org; Joe
Guenther; Josh Wilson; Kristy Vigil; Steve Siddoway
Subject: RE: DOC Hearing
Anna:
I finally had an opportunity to read through this proposed
item be pulled off the agenda and sent back to the PIG for
legal issues involved here that need to be addressed and I
challenges if adopted as is.
Please advise. Thanks.
I strongly suggest that this
review. There are some serious
think you will have some legal
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.orgJ
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:30 PM
To: David Turnbull
Cc: allens@meridiancity.org; 'Barb Shiffer'; Brad Hawkins-Clark; hoodc@meridiancity.org;
'Joe Guenther'; 'Josh Wilson'; Kristy Vigil; Steve Siddoway
Subject: RE: DOC Hearing
David,
It went well. One irate Jim Fuhrman, but that was all really. We mostly went through a
list of items I discovered on my last review. Most of them were minor, but needed a
decision. They "slogged" through those last night. They will hold a hearing next Monday
night to go over background area for commercial subdivision signs (they asked that staff
2
determine a generous upper limit), separation standards for adult entertainment, and
standards regarding development along state highways and freeways. That should be the
final hearing, and then we'll get it up to the Council to review.
The State Highway standards may be of interest to you; I've attached the draft language.
The issue came up after the PIG meetings. Sue Sullivan came over to visit our staff
meeting one day and we decided to go ahead and come up with some standards.
Does BCA want a presentation? Let me know.
Anna
Anna Borchers Canning
City of Meridian Planning Director
-----Original Message-----
From: David Turnbull [mailto:dturnbull@brightoncorp.comJ
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 6:32 AM
To: Anna Canning
Subject: RE: DOC Hearing
Anna:
How did it go last night?
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.orgJ
Sent: Fri 4/15/2005 3:52 PM
To: Becky McKay; Brad Hawkins-Clark; Brad Miller; David McKinnon; David Turnbull;
Diane Kushlan; freckleb@meridiancity.org; J. Cornel Larson; John Forsythe; P. E. David A.
Bailey; Steve Siddoway; Tammy de Weerd; mrohm@enertechservices.com; David Moe; Keith
Borup; Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Cc: allens@meridiancity.org;
'Josh Wilson'; Kristy Vigil
Subject: DOC Hearing
'Barb Shiffer'; hoodc@meridiancity.org;
'Joe Guenther';
Just a reminder that the Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on the
DOC on Monday at 7:00 p.m. Staff report and copies are available.
See you there!
Anna Borchers Canning, AICP
City of Meridian Planning Director
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202
Meridian, 10 83642
(208) 884-5533 phone
(208) 888-6854 facsimile
canninga@meridiancity.org <mailto:powella@meridiancity.org>
e-mail
3
=.==.=""=.,.=.,=."',.=,==,== =, "=='".==.="=,~ --'-'-""-'-~
MEMORANDUM
~
~--~
TO;
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ANNA BORCHERS CANNING,AICP
RECEIVED
APR 1 B 2005
city of Meridian
City Clerk Office
FROM;
SUBJECT:
DATE:
DRAFf UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OUTSTANDING ISSUES
APRIL 18, 2005
'_.~-~~
DRAFT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Chapter 1: Do we need defmitions for Christmas Tree Loú, Outdoor Stage or Musital Venue, and
Rwdential DÙ/rÙls? The terms propertY depth and propertY l/l/d/h are not used. Shall I remove them from
the definitions? I have modified the definition of restaurant and dn'nking utablÙhment based on recent
information I have received. I also changed the defmition of sign, fxJnstmction based on our last
workshop. Are you satisfied with the new defmitions? On the term propertY line, rear it is unclear if we
should measure at a point where the side property lines are not less than 10 or 20 feet apart. We need
to pick one. See illustration below:
Front
Set back line '.
'.
".
20 feet apart "'... ".
".
10 feet apart ...~ "-.
Back
Chapter 2 Section 11-2D-4: The maximum allowable height in the 0-1' district is 60 feet
(presumed three stories) in the design guidelines. However, the guidelines also encourage taller
buildings near the rail line, The proposed standard is 75 feet. Do you want to change?
Chapter 2 Section 11-2D-6: Do you want to change zero lot line proper/iN to no side yard setback
properties? The Zero lot line term is from the 1970s, and is not commonly used by anyone but planners.
Chapter 3 Article A: Would you like to add a section on development adjacent to state highways
and freeways? (See attached,)
Chapter 3 Table 11-3C-1: The Drive Aisle column is actually for one-way drive aisles, I propose
to clarify the header and then put a note stating that all two-way aisles shall be 25 feet wide,
Chapter 3 Section 11-3D-6: I modified this section based on our last workshop. Are you satisfied
with the changes? We do appear to be missing a means to allow temporary signs for political
candidates in commercial districts. k is, they would use part of a businesses 90 day allotment for the
year. There are no time limits on temporary signs in the residential district. There is a size restriction
instead.
Chapter 3 Section 11-3D-8: I propose to move the planned sign program standards to its own
section following this one. All the other items in this section are types of signs, such as construction
signs, free standing signs, billboards, real estate signs, projecting signs, wall signs, and reader boards.
Chapter 3 Table 11-3G9: We do not have standards for the 0- T and TN-C districts. Do we
want to use the standards for the L-O district for now?
Chapter 3 Table 11-3Gl and Table 11-3G2: I would propose that we change rent, lease & scde
signs to temparary signs and increase the allowed background area from 6 to 8 square feet in the R-2, R-
4, R-8, and TN-R districts. It would decrease from 32 to 8 square feet in the R-15 and R-40 districts.
An apartment complex could stili have their subdivision sign and then place a "now renting"
temporary sign out front for the business. This would be consistent with the other changes we made
to temporary signs. I just forgot to do it in the last draft.
Chapter 3 Table 11-3G3 through Table 11-3G9: We propose to add subdivision identification
signs to all the non-residential districts. Proposed standards: no limit on background area; maximum
building height equal to that of the district; location 5 feet from property line; indirect internal
illumination allowed; one sign allowed per entrance; pennit required.
Chapter 4 Section 11-4-3.10: The state requires a 300-foot separation from a church or school.
We would propose changing the 1,000 feet to 300 feet and adding a separation of 1,000 feet from an
adult entertainment facility.
Chapter 5 Section 11-5A-l: We propose to move the enforcement sectlOn to the Police
Department Code. See separate handout.
Chapter 5 Table 11-5A-1: We propose to make on accessory uses in the residential districts go
through the public notice process. We might want to except Out accessory structures less than 300
(??) square feet. I made a change with regard to home occupations with no Customers or clients. Are
you comfortable with this change? We would also like to put down the Director as a recommending
body on all applications ratherthan "none."
Chapter 5 Section 11-5A-3E: Do you want to take out the action on application section? It is not
required by state law. Most of our delays are due to improper posting of the site. I either need to take
out this section, or go back and figure out how improper posting affects the timeline process.
Chapter 5 Section 11-5A-6: Do you want to be able to appeal a decision as individuals or as the
Commission?
Chapter 5 Section 11-5G3: We need to add an item stating that the surety shall be either an
ÎITevocable letter of credit or a cash deposit. We also need to add fencing to the list of items that one
can place sureties against. We also need to add that I can release sureties.
2
Œ.apter 6 Section 11-6B-4 and 11-6B-5: I excluded landscaping lots from the maximum lot
count for both combined preliminary and final plat and the short plat process. Are you in agreement
with tlUs change?
3
11-3A-?? DEVELOPMENT ALONG HIGHWAYS AND FREEWAYS: The following
standards shall apply to all development along federal and state highways, including but
not limited to State Highway 69 (SH 69), State Highway 55 (SH 55), United States
Highway 20-26 (US 20-26), and Interstate 84. The following standards shall also apply to
development along McDermott Road.
A. Applicability:
1. The following standards shall apply to all development along federal and
state highways, including but not limited to SH 69, SHß5, US 20-26, and
Interstate 84.
2. The Council may consider and apply modifications to the standards of this
section upon specific recommendation of the Idaho Transportation
Department (fTO).
3. The Council may consider and apply modifications to the standards of this
section upon specific recommendation of the Idaho Transportation
Department (ITD).
B. Access to existing and future freeway right-of-way: no access shall be allowed to
existing or future freeway right-of-ways except at specific interchange locations
as established by the Idaho Transportation Department.
C. Access to state highways:
1. Use of existing approaches shall be allowed to continue provided that all
of the following conditions are met:
a. The existing use is lawful and properly permitted effective XX
[insert date of the adoption]
b. The nature of the use does not change (for example a residential
use to a commercial use).
c. The intensity of the use does not increase (for example an
increase in the number of residential dwelling units or an increase
in the square footage of commercial space).
2. If an applicant proposes a change or increase in intensity of use, the
owner shall develop or otherwise acquire access to a street other than the
State Highway. The use of the existing approach to the State Highway
shall cease and the approach shall be abandoned and removed.:.
a. No new approaches directly accessing a state highway shall be
allowed.
b. Public street connections to the State Highway shall only be
allowed at the half-mile between section line roads.
3. The applicant shall construct a collector street to provide future
connectivity and access to all parcels fronting the State Highway that lie
between the applicants property and the nearest arterial road or half mile
collector road.. The applicant shall be responsible to construct the
segment of the collector road within the applicant) property.:.
a. The collector street shall meet the collector road standards of the
Ada County Highway District.
b. The street shall connect to the section line or arterial street within
660 to 800 feet from the intersection with the state highway.
c. Frontage streets or private streets may be approved by the
Director through the Alternative Compliance procedures set forth
in Chapter 5 ADMINISTRATION of this Title.
D. Design and construction standards for developments adjacent to the state
highways:
1. The applicant shall have an approved permit from the Idaho
Transportation Department for construction of any access to the state
highway and/or any construction done in the highway right of way.
2. Future right-of-way dedications and/or reservations shall be as set forth
below or as required by the ITD (whichever setback is greater). All future
right-of-ways shall be measured from the center line of the existing
highway right-of-way.
a. US 20-26: The applicant shall dedicate or preserve eighty-five feet
(85') for future highway right of way. As the state highway nears
major intersections of arterial and/or section line roads, the
applicant shall dedicate or reserve an additional fifteen feet (15'),
for a total of one hundred feet (100'), for a distance of five hundred
feet (SOD') measured from the centerline of the section line roads
and/or half mile collector roads.
b. SH-69 and SH-55: As the state highway nears major intersections
of arterial and/or section line roads, the applicant shall dedicate or
preserve one hundred feet (100'), measured from the center line
of the existing highway right of way, for a distance of five hundred
feet (SOD') measured from the centerline of the section line and/or
half mile collector roads
3. SH 55:The applicant shall be responsible for constructing the ten-foot
(10') multiuse pathway and installing streetlights and landscaping
consistent with the Eagle Road Corridor Study.
4. SH 69 and US 20/26: The applicant shall construct a minimum ten-foot
(10') wide asphalt multi-use pathway outside the public right-of-way and
approximately parallel to the state highway. The pathway on US 20/26
shall be setback a minimum of eighty-five (85') from the existing
centerline of US 20/26. The pathway shall meet City of Meridian and
ACHD requirements. Portions of the pathway may be constructed within
the right-of-way with a license agreement from lTD.
E. Noise abatement for residential uses along state highways and freeways:
1. The applicant shall provide traffic noise abatement by constructing a berm
or a berm and wall combination approximately parallel to the highway
and/or freeway.
2. The top of the berm or berm and wall in combination shall be a minimum
of ten feet higher than the elevation at the centerline of the state highway.
3. If a wall is proposed, the wall materials shall be impervious concrete or
stucco, unless otherwise approved by the Idaho Transportation
Department as a sound attenuating material.
4. Intermittent breaks in the berm or berm and wall in combination will
degrade the function and shall not be allowed.
5. The Director may approve alternative compliance where the applicant has
a substitute noise abatement proposal that has been approved by lTD.
C.
6-1-6:
A.
B.
TITLE 6
CHAPTER 1
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION:
Division Created: There is hereby created as a division of the police department
the code enforcement division, which together with the personnel assigned to this
division, shall be under the supervision and direction of the chief of police and
enforced throuqh the chain of command of the police department. At all times in
this ordnance when the term police chief is used it shall also be referrina to the
assianed desiqnee of the Chief and commencing with fiscal year 2000 - 2001
budget of the police department.
Functions, Powers And Duties: The enforcement of all Meridian city code
regulations and all council actions, orders and decisions involving the issuance of
licenses and/or permits, and including the service of notices of enforcement
actions which responsibilities are not specifically provided for to other city officers
and/or officials by other provisions of this code. (Ord. 885, 9-5-2000)
Unified Development Code (Title 11 of Meridian City Code) Enforcement:
1. Violations:
a.
b.
It is a violation of the unified development code for anv
person to initiate or maintain or cause to be initiated or
maintained the use of any structure, land or real propertv
within the City of Median without first obtainina proper
permits or authorizations required for the use by the unified
development code.
It is a violation of the unified development code for any
person to use. construct. locate. demolish or cause to be
used. constructed. located. or demolished anv structure,
land or property within the city of Meridian in anv manner
that is not permitted by the terms of any permit or
authorization issued pursuant to the unified development
code or previous codes.
It is a violation of the unified development code for any
person to not comply with specific conditions of approval as
stated in a Certificate of Zoninq Compliance. Conditional
Use Permit. Final Plat, or Planned Development as set forth
in Title 11 of the Meridian Citv Code.
It is a violation of the unified development code to
misrepresent any material fact in any application. plans or
other information submitted to obtain any land use
authorization.
It is a violation of the unified development code for anvone to
fail to comply with the requirements of the development
c.
d.
e.
4.
-.---.. ,-.
2.
code, as set out in the specific sections of the code.
Dutv to Enforce:
a. It shall be the dutv of the Plannina Director to interpret the
unified development code.
It shall be the dutv of the Police Department to enforce the
reaulations of the unified development Code. The code
enforcement division mav call upon the services of the
police, fire, parks or other appropriate citv departments to
assist in enforcement.
Upon presentation of Proper credentials, the code
enforcement division officers mav, with the consent of the
owner or occupier of a buildina or premises, or pursuant to a
lawfullv issued inspection warrant. enter at reasonable times
anv buildina or premises subject to the consent or warrant to
perform the duties imposed bv this Section.
It is the intent of the unified development code to place the
obliaation of complvina with its requirements uPon the
owner, occupier or other person resPonsible for the condition
of the land and buildinas within the scope of Title 11.
Investiaation: .
a. The code enforcement division officer shall investiaate anv
structure or use which he or she reasonablv believes does
not complv with the standards and requirements of the
unified development code. -
If, after investiaation, the Planninq Director and Police Chief
and/or an authorized desiqnee determine that the standards
or requirements of Title 11 have been violated, a code
enforcement officer shall serve a notice of violation uPon the
owner, tenant or other person responsible for the condition.
The notice of violation shall state separate Iv each standard
or requirement violated; shall state what corrective action, if
any, is necessarv to comply with the standards or
requirements; and shall set a reasonable time for
compliance. The notice shall state that anv further violation
mav result in criminal prosecution and civil penalties.
The notice shall be served uPon the owner, tenant or other
person responsible for the condition bv personal service,
reaistered mail, or certified mail with return receipt requested
addressed to the last known address of such person. If, after
a reasonable search and reasonable efforts are made to
obtain service, the whereabouts of the person or persons is
unknown or service cannot be accomplished and the officer
makes an affidavit to that effect. then service of the notice
upon such person or persons mav be made by publication
and mailinq to the last known address.
Extension of Compliance Date:
a. The Police Chief and/or an authorized desianee (with the
advice of the Plannina Director) mav arant a reasonable
extension of time for compliance with any notice or order,
whether pendina or final. upon findina that substantial
proqress toward compliance has been made and that the
b.
c.
d.
3.
b.
c.
5.
Penalties.
a.
b.
c.
b.
public will not be adversely affected bv the extension. Such
extension of time shall not exceed 180 davs.
An extension of time may be revoked bv the Police Chief if it
is shown that the conditions at the time the extension was
ç¡ranted have chanqed, the Police Chief determines that a
party is not performina corrective actions as aareed. or if the
extension creates an adverse effect on the public. The date
of revocation shall then be considered as the compliance
date.
Anv person violatinq or failing to comply with any of the
provisions of Title 11 of the Meridian City Code (the unified
development code) shall be subject to criminal prosecution
and uPon conviction shall be fined in a sum not exceedina
three hundred ($300.00) or be imprisoned for a term not
exceedinq six (6) months or be both fined and imprisoned.
Each day of noncompliance with any of the provisions of the
unified development code shall constitute a separate
offense.
Notwithstandina the provisions of Subsection a above. the
Citv Attorney, at his or her sole discretion. mav civilly
prosecute anv violation of this Code and seek all available
remedies that may include. but are not limited to abatement
of the non-compliant conditions, revocations existina permits
for non-compliance. civil damaaes for enforcement, or anv
other remedy as allowed by law.
The City may file a lien uPon any real property owned by
convicted person if they fail to complv with the penalty as set
forth in this Section.
f'.ITV nJ:' !\1If=~'n'AN
-..... ......-.. """'=-".=.""'"
....UBLiC HEAt<iNG
:»i\:.r\j..U~ "HEt: T
1),. ¡-..iI?~ ?:;()£;
: ";. i-": :: "'- "--", "'- '-" '-" "-"
~ ; ~r.:~ :":"
-"""
,j
D}'\TE
P~D"j!-GT NUf.:~~F~
PRCJ~CT f'-tA}i~E
:--":ó.", T;i-ió -'i"1 : ~ñ;f;óA nÓ~'6~"""~rñÓ""'t{- i""""",':ó
:':'-":"-'" ':<"'...= , : "-,":::::'--..,, "---"-"'-"-=:';,."i'_c"~,-_.,,,,- "-..e"'-"-<'-=
~
I - -
I
I
r-"-"'~~-"'"~"'~~'~""~
I
I
¡
l
I
I
/,
I
I
,
f.-'----~"-------'"
I
I
L_....._.-.---......."......--.---......,....--.-.-..--.-., "-'-'-"'----'M...____-....,.-----.-..".
I
I
I
r"----'----"-"""""'----'--"'" """"--'-"'" ""-'----""""""---""""----'-"" "
~
I
I
i
._~-,
, . ,- .. I I
_~L_FOR IA.GA~~_Sr~~U~!'RAL I
. ! I I I
I I
I t I
""'~." "", "'T~."'~-""!"~."'~-I
I I ! I
I I !
I I I
I !I ~
! I I
I I !I
I I t
,"""----,', ---1
I II I
I i I
¡I-i"',
, ! i ¡
I I I
¡ II
..-----..- ,-.-....1.- .._---_._..,,-----_.J_. .,.-,----".-.--..1""-----..-.",-.....-"",,,...1
Iii
I I I
"---- ,--_J.",-_.. ,-____._1...__,__---. ,._---_.1"----,,..,_._-_..,-, ,.",,1
... I I ! !
I I I I
, I I I
I I I I
i ¡ j j
'"'-"'.""_.""'--"'" ., "--"...""
. NAME (PLEASE PRINT) .
."'---"--~--,--~_.
)
'r'{l'f~ "'
~~ /'ClTY\W 'm~, '::..c,
L/YL erldlCrn-~-':.~ '\'1
IDAHO .t
/
MAYOR
Tammy de WeeI'd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Dormell
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 / fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Plarming
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 / fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 / 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 / fax 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 / fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.W 8th Street
888-5242/ fax 884-1159
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning
Commissíon of the City of Merídian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Merídían, Idaho, on Monday, April 25,
2005 at 7:00 P.M. The Meridían Planning and Zoning Commíssíon wíll be
contínuíng the public hearing on the applícatíon for an ordínance for a new
Title 11 Unified Development Code replacing I repealing Title 11 Zoning
Regulations and Title 12 Subdivísion Development of the Merídian City
Code.
The public ís welcome to attend the special meeting.
DATED this 22nd of April, 2005. ß ~ P
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR - CI" -
'~~1"~1!¡ .
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888.4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR - FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
.._un -- ---- --,-
R_ECEIVED
APR 2 5 2005
City of Meridian
~ & ~1~"Z;~
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
19 April, 2005
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nompa 466-0663
William G. Berg Jr., City Clerk
Cjty_o(Meridifln--- -u- n- n
33 East Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
-------------
-.-- -- --"-
RE: -- Title 11 Zoning Regulations & Title 12 Subdivision Development
of the Meridian City Code
Dear Will:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced public
hearing to repeal Title 11 Zoning Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the
Meridian City Code and to replace with a new Title 11 Unified Development Code.
Sincerely,
Bill Hensot'. - -
Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
c:
File - Office/Shop
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
" .
-------
, I
J~:
!~i
! i
L..-_-----'
¡-----------l
,
i~!
. I
I DO DO i
¡DO,
, I
I '
._--------_J
;-----r----ì
I . i
I'~'
, I
i DO DO i
¡DO,
. I I
I '
----_....i..._---_J
r-----------------
,
I '
, I
,
, I
I '
, I
I '
, I
L._____-----------....i
Single family detached
or manufactured home
tJ 1 structure
L J 1 property
~ 1 dwelling unit
Duplex
tJ 1 structure
LJ 1 property
~ 2 dwelling units
Single family attached
tJ 1 structure
LJ 2 properties
llim 2 dwelling units
Townhouse
tJ 1 structure
LJ 3 properties .
llim 3 or more dwelling units
Multifamily
C::J 1 structure
L.- - j 1 property
~ 3 or more dwelling units
1A-4
D
~}g
. J
~
I
~i
i~
~
~-
/j
?
.~
I i ~ i i i -@-¡
I ¡It t! ! ¡~j i
\» I 'I:)~ I
. . eJ!! fiWl ]
I ~@@~~ _.-+~~¡.
. I - '. " ._~
- . -'-~ 'f I r -.. ",. :
1\: -. -.-. .~ . ----1 ::
,~. ~:, ,/ ,
. "'" ; f I ! ,
. "" I ,
'\'" :. .
I '\.) I~
~:".~ '
.
L -,
"-.
I r Ú . "":::" ~ ,', ., ni
r""...§$1 ~/ ¡ :
! . " '.. 3
. .Ii -'~'J ro. il :~.
1 . . . . .
.¡ t.: .. '. ,
" , . . J .
. . ':,.: :
'n.....~. . .-. .
. f....,...,. Or:
f 0 " I' . .. .-, . ..,
, , -"--
'-", . t- t
~ .-.- . L>- .., I
'([ I .. ~ t: ." ,
. . ° t
WOO --I i '! f ! Î !¡lm¡
J, " , ,
1 . : : , ,
' " ......J L
" "..'.'.
i J .
i ~""'4:'.. 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
RECEIVED
APR , 8 2005
city of Meridian
City Clerk Office
April 18,2005
ITEM #
3
DATE
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
Ordinance for a New Title 11 Unified Development Code
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
F~\ùL PJSt:; X
.M ¡;q ,'"" k' ¡(U$S('éé X
vi
..j
** TX CONF I RMAT ION REPORT ** AS OF APR 15 '05 15:26 PAGE. 01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDl:1 STATUS
135 134/15 14: 54 3810160 EC--S 01'44" 13133 070 OK
136 04/15 14:56 PUBLIC l.JORKS EC--S 01'02" 1303 070 OK
137 04/15 14:58 2088840744 EC--S 131'04" 003 0713 OK
æ 134/15 14:59 POLICE DEPT EC--S 01'132" 003 1370 OK
09 04/15 15: 131 8965501 EC--S 01' 131" 121133 137121 OK
10 04/15 15:132 LIBRARY EC--S 01' 21" 003 1370 OK
11 04/15 15:04 92083776449 EC--S 01' 01" 0133 070 OK
12 04/15 15: 06 3886924 EC--S 01' 01" 0133 07121 OK
13 04/15 15: 137 P-AND-Z EC--S 01'01" 1303 070 OK
14 134/15 15:09 208 895 13390 EÇ--S 131'02" 01213 121713 OK
15 04/15 15: 113 1283000413 G3--S 131'18" 131213 12170 OK
16 04/15 15: 12 2Ø8 387 6393 EC--S 131' 1211" 1211213 121713 OK
17 04/15 15: 14 ADA CTY DEVELMT EC--S 01'132" 003 070 OK
18 04/15 15: 15 8885052 EC--S 1211'02" 12103 070 OK
19 04/15 15:17 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 1211'02" 003 070 OK
213 04/15 15: 18 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 1211'08" 003 070 OK
21 1214/15 15:213 212188886701 EC--S 1211' 131" 003 137121 OK
22 1214/15 15:25 8841159 EC--S 1211'133" 003 137121 OK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fJlea¡¿ !bSf -hY ¡JM?t.- ¡</vl>~
MA\OR
Tammy de W..l"d
Cm COUNCIl. MEMBERS
Keith I;!Îrd
Christioo LJonn.U
Chades M. Ro...ntr..
Shoun Wa.dIe
ÜT'i Dill'ARTM~Nr5
Fil.
540 E. P.an!clin Road
A~8-1234 / fax 895-0390
Park. &: RecreJtiot'\
1 W. 60we. Street
588-3579 I (ox 898-550!
PI..nnill,;
6~0 E. Water tower L:\ne
S\Üte 202
884-5533 / fa,,- 888-<;844
Police
]4{)'t 1;. Water/ower T_ane
888-6678 / 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. W.tertow..lane
S"i1l;200
898-5500/ fa,,- 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertowel" lan.
Suit<! 150
887-2211 /fax887-!297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 / ¡'IX 884.0744
. Waler
2235 N.W. 8th StIeet
8&8-5242 / tax 884-\159
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Monday, April 18,
2005 at 7:00 P.M. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will be
holding a public hearing on the application for an ordinance for a new Title
11 Unified Development Code replacing I repealing Title 11 Zoning
Regulations and TItle 12 Subdivision Development of the Meridian City
Code.
The public is welOJme to attend the special meeting,
DATED this 14th of April, 2005. d!~Þ-
Cm HALL 33 EAST ID^flO A VENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
errY CL.ERI< - FAX St ¡ .'2)~ CITY A1TORNRv I H' - FAX 99..8123 FrNI\NÇJ¡ IdlTILITY BlUING - fl\X 961-4813 MAVO~'S OFFICE-FAX M'..8\1
",in,e. 0.\ "'Y""ò pop..-
. j j/let2¡¿ /oSf fùy ¡Jâk¿ ;<Iv/J~
oW;;;;¡/!:n~'~\,
~'C IDAHO )
é;\rlt
fI, I1,'TREASUR~V~-{
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donnell
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 1 fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 1 fax 898-5501
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 1 fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 1 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 1 fax 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 1 fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 1 fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.W 8th Street
888-52421 fax 884-1159
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Monday, April 18,
2005 at 7:00 P.M. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will be
holding a public hearing on the application for an ordinance for a new Title
11 Unified Development Code replacing I repealing Títle 11 Zoning
Regulatíons and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the Meridian City
Code.
The public ís welcome to attend the special meetíng.
DATED this 14th of April, 2005. d!~ P
WILLIAM G. BERG, J
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888-4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR - FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
1.
Roll-call Attendance:
Keith Borup
David Mae
Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm
Chairman David Zaremba
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
IJ Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Planning and Zoning Commission are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter. II
3.
Public Hearing: Application for an Ordinance for a New Title 11
Unified Development Code replacing I repealing Title 11 Zoning
Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the Meridian City
Code:
Meridian Planning and Zoning Conmlssion Special Meeting Agenda - April 18, 2005 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring acconvnodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AMENDING THE ZONING & SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of
Meridían and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoníng
Commission of the Cíty of Merídían will hold a public hearing at the Merídían City
Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Merídian, Idaho on Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00
p.m. for the purpose of reviewíng and consideríng the applícations of an
ordinance to repeal Title 11 Zoning Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision
Development of the Merídían Cíty Code and to replace wíth a new Title 11
Unified Development Code.
The new ordinance embodíes the official zoníng ordínance of the City of
Meridían to provide for orderly growth and development and carry out the polícies
of Merídian's Comprehensíve Plan. The Unified Development Code will not
include the R-3 and T -E zoníng classíficatíons. Propertíes that currently have
these zones wíll be rezoned to R-2 and L-O respectively. More and all specific
changes can be revíewed by goíng to the Cíty of Merídian's web síte at
www.meridiancitV.orQ and searching on the Planning and Zoning Department's
web page. You may also víew and inspect the applicatíon at the City Clerk's
Offíce at 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho and the Planning and Zoning
Department at 660 East Watertower Lane, Merídían, Idaho duríng regular
business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. If you
would líke to purchase a paper copy and I or disk copy, please call ín advance to
the Planning and Zoning Department at 884-5533 or the City Clerk's Office at
888-4433.
Any and all ínterested persons shall be heard at said public hearing, and
the public ís welcome and ínvíted to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be
limited to three (3) mínutes per person. Wrítten materials I testimony may be
submítted seven (7) days príor to the above hearing date so that all interested
parties may examíne them prior to the hearing. All materials presented at public
meetings shall become property of the City of Merídian. Anyone desíring
accommodation for disabílítíes related to documents and I or hearings, please
contact the Cíty Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the p . ..
meetíng.
Dated this 1 st day of Apríl.
dI~/2
Wí/liam G. Berg, Jr. -
Publish AprU 4th and 11 th, 2005
j
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donnell
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 1 fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 1 fax 898-5501
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 1 fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 1 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 1 fax 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 1 fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N- Ten Mile Road
888-2191 1 fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.w. 8th Street
888-52421 fax 884-1159
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the Cíty of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Monday, April 18,
2005 at 7:00 P.M. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commissíon will be
holdíng a public hearing on the applicatíon for an ordinance for a new Title
11 Unified Development Code replacing I repealing Títle 11 Zoníng
Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the Meridian City
Code.
The public is welcome to attend the special meeting.
DATED this 14th of April, 2005. .L
df~P
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888-4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR - FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884-8119
PÖnted on recycled paper
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
1.
Roll-call Attendance:
Keith Borup
Davíd Moe
Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm
Chaírman David Zaremba
2.
Adoption of the Agenda:
"A/though the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all
presentations before the Planning and Zoning Commission are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter. "
3.
Public Hearing: Application for an Ordinance for a New Title 11
Unified Development Code replacing I repealíng Títle 11 Zoning
Regulatíons and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the Merídian City
Code:
Meridian Planning and Zoning Convnission Special Meeting Agenda - April 18. 2005 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
j
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donnell
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 1 fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Plarming
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533 1 fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 1 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Water tower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500 1 fax 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 1 fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 1 fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.w. 8th Street
888-52421 fax 884-1159
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian wm hold a Special Meeting at Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Monday, April 18,
2005 at 7:00 P.M. The. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will be
holding a public hearing on the application for an ordinance for a new Title
11 Unífied Development Code replacing I repealing Title 11 Zoning
Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision Development of the Meridian City
Code.
The public is welcome to attend the special meetíng.
DATED this 14th of April, 2005. ¿{ ~ þ
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888.4218 CITY ATTORNEY / HR - FAX 884-8723 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE - FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AMENDING THE ZONING & SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordínances of the City of
Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoning
Commissíon of the Cíty of Meridían wíl/ hold a publíc hearíng at the Merídian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Merídian, Idaho on Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00
p.m. for the purpose of revíewíng and consídering the applícations of an
ordinance to repeal Title 11 Zoning Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision
Development of the Merídian Cíty Code and to replace wíth a new Title 11
Unified Development Code.
The new ordinance embodies the official zoning ordínance of the City of
Merídian to provide for orderly growth and development and carry out the polícies
of Merídían's Comprehensive Plan. The Unified Development Code wíll not
include the R-3 and T -E zoníng classificatíons. Properties that currently have
these zones wíll be rezoned to R-2 and L-O respectively. More and all specific
changes can be revíewed by goíng to the Cíty of Meridian's web síte at
www.meridiancitv.ora and searching on the Planníng and Zoníng Department's
web page. You may also view and ínspect the applícatíon at the City Clerk's
Office at 33 East Idaho Avenue, Merídian, Idaho and the Planning and Zoning
Department at 660 East Watertower Lane, Merídían, Idaho during regular
business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. If you
would like to purchase a paper copy and I or disk copy, please call ín advance to
the Planning and Zoníng Department at 884-5533 or the City Clerk's Office at
888-4433.
Any and all ínterested persons shall be heard at said publíc hearing, and
the publíc ís welcome and ínvíted to submít testímony. Oral testimony may be
límited to three (3) minutes per person. Wrítten materíals I testímony may be
submítted seven (7) days príor to the above hearing date so that all ínterested
partíes may examine them príor to the hearíng. All materials presented at public
meetíngs shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring
accommodatíon for disabilítíes related to documents and I or hearíngs, please
contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the p,
meeting. ,
Dated thís 1 st day of April.
d/~~
Wlllíam G. Berg, Jr. -
Publísh Apríl 4th and 11 th, 2005
APPLICANT ITEM NO. ~
REQUEST Public Hearing - Application for an Ordinance for a new Title 11 Unified
Development Code replacin~alin~ TItle 11 Zoning Regulations and TItle 12
Subdivision Development of the Meridian City Code:
April 18,2005
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
See attached StaB Comments
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
Staff Initials:
Phone:
Materials presented cat public meetings shc;dl become property of the City of Meridlon.
)
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY IIAU"
(208) 888-4433 - F"-" 887-4813
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Christine Donne1l
Shaun Wardle
Charles M, Rountree
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - FO-" 898-9551
IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 888-4433
60 TRliN;UnE V ~..
STAFF REPORT:
P&Z Hearing Date: April 18, 2005
Transmittal Date: April 14, 2005
To:
Chairman Zaremba and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
From:
Anna Borchers Canning, AICP
Planning Director
-¡:::'-~1 {-"~¡ I~': -)~I '"\ 7.":{-q "1--1;
j",~,,-- \,1.,..
,. ,,- ",JI.._." ",."", , -""""' -- .1._" .,-~--_.,..-
Subject:
Unified Development Code
APRI 4 2005
Overview:
.c;ity C)f J\Ic:'I;~ÒaJ~
'=;i!:y C] ()ffj .::é
On Monday April 18, 2005, the Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing
on the proposed Unified Development Code. The proposed code replaces in entirety Title
11 ZONING REGUL\ TIONS and Title 12 SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT of the Meridian
City Code. Authority for adoption of the Unified Development Code is found in State of
Idaho Code §65-67. The Planning and Zoning Commission's responsibility to the City
Council for a recommendation on the Code is established by Meridian City Code Title 2.
This staff report reviews background in preparation of the proposed code, major highlights,
required findings and a chapter by chapter review of the proposed code's content.
Background:
In August 2002, the City of Meridian adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, setting the future
course for growth and development within the City of Meridian and the Area of City
Impact. The existing zoning and subdivision regulations for the City do not fully support or
carry out the direction as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the existing
codes are archaic, internally inconsistent, subject to interpretation, and complex in
administration. A thorough update of the codes provides an opportunity to better support
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as provide a tool that is more relevant and contemporary to
the needs of the City.
In December 2003, the Planning Department staff, with assistance from a consultant, began
a comprehensive review of the zoning and subdivision codes. A draft of the new unified
development code was prepared in April 2004 and transmitted to the Process Improvement
1
Group; a group appointed by the Mayor with representatives from the development
community, an architect, an engineer and the Planning and Zoning Conunission chair. The
Process Improvement Group reviewed the proposed code page by page and line by line,
reconunending changes and analyzing the effects of the code on individual properties. The
group also heard presentations from City staff, a multi-family developer, and the school
district. From the group's review over a seven-month period, changes to the draft code were
made and presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission in two workshops beginning
in February 2005. The conunents of the Planning and Commission review have been
incorporated into the draft code that was available for public review on April 4, 2005.
Major Highlights of new Unified Development Code:
1. Comprehensive Plan Implementation - The new Unified Development Code (ODC)
implements the adopted Comprehensive Plan in several ways. First, the zoning
districts are brought into line with the land use designations shown on the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Seven zoning districts not used or duplicative
to other regulations or districts have been eliminated. The R-3 District has been
combined with the R-2 District.
Three new districts have been created: Heavy Industrial (I-H), Traditional
Neighborhood Center (rN-C) and Traditional Neighborhood Residential (TN-R).
The last two districts have been created specifically to implement the provisions of
the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use centers and neighborhoods.
Second, the standards for development have been amended to reflect the current
needs of a more urbanized conununity. Connection to public services is a pre~
requisite to development in all districts. Amenities including open space, landscaping
and sidewa1ks are requirements to create more livable and sustainable
neighborhoods.
Third, dimensional standards for residential districts have been amended so that
there is a reasonable expectation that the density that is allowed within each district
can be achieved. This is an important change to catty out the intentions for density,
development patterns, and opportunities for transit as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Fourth, policies for the re-vitalization of the downtown have been reinforced
through allowing more intense and compact development in the downtown,
eliminating the requirements that all uses are subject to a conditional use permit and
changing the focus of review to design.
2. Standards - Standards for uses have been more thoroughly considered and clearly
derIDed. Unnecessary and archaic standards have been eliminated. Regulations that
apply in all districts are organized in Chapter 3. Regulations that apply to specific
uses are contained in Chapter 4.
2
Standards for form and design have been introduced. New design standards have
been drafted for large scale structures. Greater focus is on standards of performance
over prescriptive requirements. Through the comprehensive, up front identification
of standards, the processing and decisions on permits will be more predictable,
consistent and expedient.
3. Responsibilities - With the more explicit statement of standards and regulations, the
number of uses subject to a conditional use permit has been reduced; the
responsibility has shifted from the City Council to the Planning and Zoning
Commission. This will allow the Council more time for other City projects and
concerns. Likewise, the responsibility for minor actions has shifted to the Planning
Director. This will allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to focus on major
planning projects; it also provides more expedient processing time on minor
applications.
4. Format- As added to and amended over time, the existing codes are contained within
2 tides and 22 and 12 chapters, respectively. New sections were added to the end and
not integrated into the existing code. The format within the chapters is inconsistent
and unorganized making it difficult to find information. The new format combines
the two tides into one unified code, with six chapters organized around subject areas
and that follow a consistent format. A new table of content has also been included.
5. Housekeeping- Content within the existing codes is duplicative, overlapping and
inconsistent. Terms are used but not defined and some words are defined but not
used. Through the comprehensive update in the new unified code, all of these
content and definition issues have been cleaned up.
Chapter Review:
Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS- This chapter has three sections. The first section sets
forth the purpose of the code, scope and content, applicability and interpretations. The
section specifies how pending applications will be processed with adoption of the new code.
How terms are applied, measurements are made and conflicting interpretations resolved is
also described in this section. Finally, this section outlines a process for determining if a use
should be allowed when that use is not listed on the use charts.
Article A. contains definitions of terms and uses. The North Amen"can Industrial Classijìcation
System (NAICS) published by the United States Department of Commerce has been used as
a guide in defining uses.
Article B. describes how nonconfonning property, uses and structures shall be treated.
Chapter 2 DISTRICT REGULATIONS - This chapter has four articles; one each for
residential, commercial, industrial and traditional neighborhood districts. Each article follows
the same format describing the purpose for the districts, allowed uses, and standards.
3
Allowed uses are listed in a chart as pennitted, accessory, conditional or prohibited. An
asterisk provides a reference point for those uses that are subject to standards contained in
Chapter 4. The use charts contain some new and emerging uses; for example, flex space,
vertically integrated residential projects, and urban farm.
Article A. addresses residential districts. The use charts specify that multi-family dwellings
may be allowed in the R-4 and R-8 Land Use Districts when included in a Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Dimensional standards have been amended to accommodate different
types of residential units and property configurations. Minimum house size requirements as a
percentage of an overall development have been eliminated. In drafting the dimensional
standards for residential uses, a lot of care was taken to ensure that density established for
the residential district could be achieved.
Article B. and C. set forth provisions for commercial and industrial districts, respectively.
The allowed uses for the commercial and industrial districts have been specified to be
consistent with the purpose and desired location for each district. Some lesser intensive uses
have been excluded in these districts to preserve the intent of the district. Landscape buffers,
formerly in the landscape code, have been incorporated into the dimensional standards for
both conunercial and industrial uses. Height has generally been increased in the conunercial
districts and additional height can be achieved thxough the provision of amenities or thxough
a conditional use pennit process.
Article D. is the Traditional Neighborhood Districts which include the Old Town District
(0-1) as well as the two new Traditional Neighborhood Center (TN-C) and Traditional
Neighborhood Residential (TN-R) districts. These districts encourage a mix of uses in a
compact and more traditional neighborhood form. There is greater flexibility in the allowed
uses and dimensional requirements than in the standard districts, but there are specifications
that these districts be well integrated thxough pedestrian connections and a street grid
system. This Article also establishes a new administrative design review process for all new
construction and exterior modifications in the Old Town District.
Chapter 3 REGULATIONS APPLYING TO ALL DISTRICTS - This chapter is organized into
seven articles. Article A is regulations in all districts in an alphabetical listing of twenty three
subject areas from "accumulation of junk" to "utilities". Regulations formerly appearing in
the landscaping and subdivision codes have been amended and included in this section.
These include: SIDEW"\LKS "'\ND PARKWAYS, PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY AND SE\VER SYSTEMS,
MULTI-USE AND MICRO PATHWAYS, DITCHES, L'\TERALS, CAN.\LS OR DRi\.INi'\.GE COURSES;
STORl\f DRAINAGE; and UTILITIES. A new section, STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO DESIGN
STANDARDS sets forth building and site design standards for larger structures within certain
districts.
Article B. is the former Landscaping Code. This section has been re-organized and much of
the content remains the same except for those sections that now appear in other sections of
the Code.
Article C. is standards for off-street parking and loading. The most significant change in this
article is the elimination of the chart of minimum parking requirements for non-residential
uses. Parking requirements will be determined based on the specific use, location, and
4
availability of alternative transportation modes as determined by the Director.
Article D. is standards for signs. Since sign regulations have been recently amended, there
are few changes. Other than organization and format, the most significant changes are for
temporary sign requirements.
Article E. is a new section on temporary uses. General standards as well as specific standards
for particular types of temporary uses are identified.
Article F. is standards for private streets. Private streets are allowed for commercial,
industrial and multi-family uses. Private streets for other residential developments are limited
to only what is needed for safety.
Article G. contains new provisions for common open space and site amenity requirements
applicable to all residential development. Minimum open space requirements are established
and additional site amenities dependent on the size of the development are specified. Street
buffers may qualify as a certain percentage of the open space requirement.
Chapter 4 SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS sets forth specific use standards for forty three of the
uses identified in the use charts. The article identifies minimum standards, as well as specifies
for some uses, the threshold when a conditional use permit is required. Of particular interest
are the standards for DRIVE THROUGH ESTABLISHMENTS; DWELLING UNIT, SECONDARY;
HOME OCCUPATION; i\ruLTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; AND VERTICl\.LLY INTEGRi\.TED
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
Chapter 5 ADMINISTRATION has three articles. Article A. is general provisions which
outline the duties and responsibilities of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission
and Director in the administration of the Code. The application, administrative, public
hearing, and city council review processes are described. Table 11-5A-1 provides a summary
of all permits or actions, which authority is responsible for the decision and the process for
the decision.
Article B. sets forth the specific requirements for certificate of zoning compliance,
development code amendments, alternative compliance, variances and conditional uses. For
each, the purpose of the permit, applicability, process, standards, and required [IDdings are
identified. These are provisions that formerly were located in various sections throughout
Titles 11 and 12.
The alternative compliance process, flrst adopted as part of the landscape code, has been
expanded to other provisions where alternative methods can achieve the same or superior
level of compliance as the code requirement. Table 11-5A~1 is a summary of the
requirements that may be met through alternative compliance.
Article C. describes the purpose, applicability, and process for surety agreements.
Chapter 6 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS is contained in tluee articles. Article A. outlines the
purpose, applicability and authority for regulation of subdivisions.
5
Article B. describes the subdivision process. Four separate processes are included:
PRELIMINARY PLAT, FINAL PLAT, COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, AND SHORT
PLAT. A short plat is a new process applicable to commercial, industrial, TN-C, and O-T
districts under specific and limited circumstances. This article also establishes the required
findings for approval of plats, time limits for recording a final plat, and property boundary
adjustment process and standards.
Article C. sets forth the subdivision design standards for streets, driveways, easements and
blocks. A cross reference to other standards contained in Chapter 3 that apply to
subdivisions is also provided.
Chapter 7 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT establishes the applicability, process, standards,
required fmdings, conditions, and term of pennits for planned unit developments. The
purpose reinforces the intent of PUD to be the exception to subdivisions and not to be a
tool for deviation from the standards in the district. The provisions allow that a specific
conditional or accessory usee s) not otherwise allowed in the district, be allowed as principal
pennitted use(s) and that deviations from the zoning requirements for dimensional standards
are not allowed on the periphery of the district.
Zoning Amendment Findings:
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General S tandardJ Applimble to Zoning AmendmentJ, both the
P&Z Commission and City Council are required "to review the particular facts and
circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and
shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning
amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in Meridian City Code 11-15-11 and analysis of
the proposed Unified Development Code by staff:
A.
Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds the Zoning Amendment application complies with and furthers the goals
and objectives of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. There are a number of actions called
for in the Plan which the existing Zoning Ordinance either does not allow or are made
easier to accomplish through the proposed amendment. Specific Objectives and
Actions that support the proposed amendment are listed below:
Chapter IV
. Goal I, Obj. B, #2 - Amend zoning ordinance and map to ensure wide variety of
housing types can be developed and properly zoned and land is available.
. Goal II, Obj. C, #3 - Allocate and identify locations/inventory for industrial and
commercial business parks.
6
.
Goal II, Obi. D, #8 - Develop incentives to retain the existing institutional,
commercial and government anchors to remain in Old Town.
Goal II, Obi. D, #14 - Develop incentives to develop higher density housing
throughout the Old Town neighborhood and in dispersed developments.
.
Chapter V
. Goal II, Obi. A, #7 - Establish thematic or uniform signage.
. Goal III, Obi. B. #1 - Draft appropriate community design ordinances.
. Goal III, Obi. B, #5 - Use the comprehensive plan, subdivision regulations and
zoning to discourage strip development and encourage clustered, landscaped
business or residential development on entryway corridors.
. Goal III, Obi. D, #1 - Develop incentives for open space areas within all
development.
. Goal III, Obi. D, #6 - Adopt a new landscape ordinance. . .
. Goal III, Obi. D, #7 - Adopt a new sign ordinance. . .
Chapter VI
. Goal II, Obi. B, #9 - The City should review its current regulations for issues
that would prohibit or discourage the type of mixed-use, transit-oriented
development desired within transit overlay districts.
. Goal V, Obi. A, #2 - Develop provisions for medical services in the Zoning and
Development Ordinance.
Chapter VII
. Goal I, Obi. C, #1 - Amend the zoning ordinance and map to implement this
plan (Comprehensive Plan)
. Goal I, Obi. C, #2 - Develop standards for integrating medium-to-high density
residential into existing subdivision development.
. Goal I, Obi. E, #3 - Require industrial areas to create a site design compatible
with surrounding uses and community design criteria.
. Goal I, Obi. E, #6 - Separate heavy industrial and light industrial within the
Zoning Ordinance.
. Goal II, Obi. A, #5 - Amend the zoning ordinance and map to implement the
provisions of this plan.
. Goal IV, Obi. A, #5 - Require industrial development to conform to Federal
and State air, water and noise pollution standards, and local landscaping, traffic,
noise and environmental standards.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #6 - Require pedestrian access in all new development. . .
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #7 - Provide for non-exclusive residential zoning that allows
for low-impact neighborhood commercial areas to develop in residential districts.
Develop standards to regulate neighborhood commercial uses to minimize the
impact on the integrity of the residential district.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #9 - Adopt land use designations which will allow for housing
opportunities for all income levels.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #10 - Support a variety of residential categories Oow, medium
and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments,
7
.
condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of
affordable housing opportunities.
Goal V, Obi. A, #13 - Review ordinances or other policy statements which
affect housing development and consolidated to avoid confusion and use of
conflicting policies and requirements.
Goal V, Obi. C, #2 - Enact new Planned Development and subdivision
ordinances.
Goal V, Obi. C, #3 - Revise existing ordinances to include height limitation,
density, scale, floor area to green space ratio, traffic generation and landscaping.
Goal V, Obi. C, #4 - Re-evaluate residential density categories (i.e. R-8 to R-15
to R-40 is too broad of a range) in the zoning ordinance.
Goal V, Obi. C, #5 - Eliminate vague/unclear standards in development
ordinances.
.
.
.
.
Staff also finds that the proposed UDC includes three (3) new zoning districts (I-H,
TN-C and TN-R) which help to bring the ordinance into line with the land use
designations shown on the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The last two
districts have been created specifically to implement the provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan for mixed use centers and neighborhoods. We find the
application is harmonious with and in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and Generalized Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Existing
Urban".
B.
Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in
a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The City of Meridian's rapid pace of residential, commercial and office development
continued unabated since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 2002. The north and
southeast areas of the city experienced the highest amount of growth, but pockets of
west and central Meridian added fair amounts of new development as well. (See the
COMPASS Development Monitoring Report for additional growth figures.) The
amount of past and projected growth and the Comprehensive Plan Actions/Policies
listed above dictate that the City's development and subdivision codes be revamped to
better prepare Meridian for the next 10-15 years of growth.
c.
Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be hannonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential
character ofthe same area;
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, new development
that is regulated by the UDC is anticipated to be harmonious and blended with
surrounding neighborhoods in an enhanced way - due in part to new design and
operation standards included in the new code.
8
D.
Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
See Finding "C" above.
E.
Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such
services;
Staff fmds that the UDC does not propose any significant changes to how public
utilities and services are provided to new development. All City departments, public
agencies and service providers that currendy review applications will continue to do so.
H anything, the level of review and comment on development applications will be
improved since the UDC requires pre-application and neighborhood meetings for
applications which require a public hearing (see Section 11-SA-S).
F.
Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community;
Not applicable.
G.
Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,
property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,
noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, the UDC does
include a number of new and more comprehensive standards that serve to regulate
potentially noxious, disturbing, hazardous or other detrimental conditions. (See
Section 11-4, Specific Use Standards).
H.
Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Not applicable.
I.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature
of major importance; and
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, the UDC does add
new language which specifies all natural waterways to remain open. It also provides
more specificity on environmental agency review and approval processes so applicants
are better informed about state and federal rules.
9
J.
Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian.
(Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the proposed amendment is clearly in the best interest of the City -
both for its residents and workforce. Many aspects of the existing code (Title 11
and 12) have remained unchanged since its adoption in 1984. Those standards may
have been adequate for the rates and types of growth experienced during the 1980's
and 1990's, but they need to be changed. We find that the proposed streamlining of
the land development process (i.e. allowing more uses as pennitted vs. conditional
and providing staff with greater review authority) will facilitate economic
development. The addition of three new zoning districts expands the palette of
allowed uses and should contribute to a more self-sufficient community. The
proposed code incorporates planning principles and land use regulations which will
guide the City's development into the 21 st century and facilitate a higher quality of
development for our citizens.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the subject
Zoning Amendment application (Unified Development Code) to the City Council. At the
April 18th public hearing, we intend to present a few minor modifications and edits to the
code as it was submitted to you on April 4th. We request that any motion of approval include
those modifications. We look forward to a good dialogue with both the Commission and the
public about this application.
10
Page I ot 1
Will Berg
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:00 AM
To: 'Tara Green'; 'Jessica Johnson'; hillm@meridlancity.org; mrohrn@enertechservices.com;
moed@att.net; Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Cc: bergw@ci.meridianJd.us; 'Bill Nary'; 'Ted Baird'; 'Diane Kushlan'
Subject: Unified Development Code Staff Report
Attached please find the staff report for the April 18th P&Z Commission hearing on the new Unified Development
Code (Zoning Amendment application). We apologize for the late submission.
Brad Hawkins..Clark
Principal City Planner
City of Meridian
Ph: 208.884.5533
Fx: 208.888-6854
haw ki ns b@merid.iancitY.ora
www.meridiancitv.ora
4/15/2005
Group; a group appointed by the Mayor with representatives from the development
community, an architect, an engineer and the Planning and Zoning Commission chair. The
Process Improvement Group reviewed the proposed code page by page and line by line,
recommending changes and analyzing the effects of the code on individual properties. The
group also heard presentations from City staff, a multi-family developer, and the school
district. From the group's review over a seven-month period, changes to the draft code were
made and presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission in two workshops beginning
in February 2005. The comments of the Planning and Commission review have been
incorporated into the draft code that was available for public review on April 4, 2005.
Major Highlights of new Unified Development Code:
1. Comprehensive Plan Implementation - The new Unified Development Code (ODC)
implements the adopted Comprehensive Plan in several ways. First, the zoning
districts are brought into line with the land use designations shown on the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Seven zoning districts not used or duplicative
to other regulations or districts have been eliminated. The R-3 District has been
combined with the R-2 District.
Three new districts have been created: Heavy Industrial (I-H), Traditional
Neighborhood Center (TN-C) and Traditional Neighborhood Residential (TN-R).
The last two districts have been created specifically to implement the provisions of
the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use centers and neighborhoods.
Second, the standards for development have been amended to reflect the current
needs of a more urbanized community. Connection to public services is a pre-
requisite to development in all districts. Amenities including open space, landscaping
and sidewalks are requirements to create more livable and sustainable
neighborhoods.
Third, dimensional standards for residential districts have been amended so that
there is a reasonable expectation that the density that is allowed within each district
can be achieved. This is an important change to carry out the intentions for density,
development patterns, and opportunities for transit as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Fourth, policies for the re-vitalization of the downtown have been reinforced
through allowing more intense and compact development in the downtown,
eliminating the requirements that all uses are subject to a conditional use permit and
changing the focus of review to design.
2. Standards - Standards for uses have been more thoroughly considered and clearly
defined. Unnecessary and archaic standards have been eliminated. Regulations that
apply in all districts are organized in Chapter 3. Regulations that apply to specific
uses are contained in Chapter 4.
2
Standards for form and design have been introduced. New design standards have
been drafted for large scale structures. Greater focus is on standards of performance
over prescriptive requirements. Through the comprehensive, up front identification
of standards, the processing and decisions on permits will be more predictable,
consistent and expedient.
3. Responsibilities - With the more explicit statement of standards and regulations, the
number of uses subject to a conditional use permit has been reduced; the
responsibility has shifted from the City Council to the Planning and Zoning
Commission. This will allow the Council more time for other City projects and
concerns. Likewise, the responsibility for minor actions has shifted to the Planning
Director. This will allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to focus on major
planning projects; it also provides more expedient processing time on minor
applications.
4. Format- As added to and amended over time, the existing codes are contained within
2 tides and 22 and 12 chapters, respectively. New sections were added to the end and
not integrated into the existing code. The format within the chapters is inconsistent
and unorganized making it difficult to fmd information. The new format combines
the two tides into one unified code, with six chapters organized around subject areas
and that follow a consistent format. A new table of content has also been included.
5. Housekeeping- Content within the existing codes is duplicative, overlapping and
inconsistent. Terms are used but not defined and some words are defined but not
used. Through the comprehensive update in the new unified code, all of these
content and definition issues have been cleaned up.
Chapter Review:
Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS- This chapter has three sections. The first section sets
forth the purpose of the code, scope and content, applicability and interpretations. The
section specifies how pending applications will be processed with adoption of the new code.
How terms are applied, measurements are made and conflicting interpretations resolved is
also described in this section. Finally, this section outlines a process for determining if a use
should be allowed when that use is not listed on the use charts.
Article A. contains defmitions of terms and uses. The North American Industrial Classification
S}Stem (NAICS) published by the United States Department of Commerce has been used as
a guide in defining uses.
Article B. describes how nonconforming property, uses and structures shall be treated.
Chapter 2 DISTRICT REGULATIONS - This chapter has four articles; one each for
residential, commercial, industrial and traditional neighborhood districts. Each article follows
the same format describing the purpose for the districts, allowed uses, and standards.
3
Allowed uses are listed in a chart as permitted, accessory, conditional or prohibited. An
asterisk provides a reference point for those uses that are subject to standards contained in
Chapter 4. The use charts contain some new and emerging uses; for example, flex space,
vertically integrated residential projects, and urban farm.
Article A. addresses residential districts. The use charts specify that multi-family dwellings
may be allowed in the R-4 and R-8 Land Use Districts when included in a Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Dimensional standards have been amended to accommodate different
types of residential units and property configurations. Minimum house size requirements as a
percentage of an overall development have been eliminated. In drafting the dimensional
standards for residential uses, a lot of care was taken to ensure that density established for
the residential district could be achieved.
Article B. and C. set forth provisions for commercial and industrial districts, respectively.
The allowed uses for the commercial and industrial districts have been specified to be
consistent with the purpose and desired location for each district. Some lesser intensive uses
have been excluded in these districts to preserve the intent of the district. Landscape buffers,
formerly in the landscape code, have been incorporated into the dimensional standards for
both commercial and industrial uses. Height has generally been increased in the commercial
districts and additional height can be achieved through the provision of amenities or through
a conditional use permit process.
Article D. is the Traditional Neighborhood Districts which include the Old Town District
(0-1) as well as the two new Traditional Neighborhood Center (TN-C) and Traditional
Neighborhood Residential (TN-R) districts. These districts encourage a mix of uses in a
compact and more traditional neighborhood form. There is greater flexibility in the allowed
uses and dimensional requirements than in the standard districts, but there are specifications
that these districts be well integrated through pedestrian connections and a street grid
system. This Article also establishes a new adm:inistrative design review process for all new
construction and exterior modifications in the Old Town District.
Chapter 3 REGULATIONS APPLYING TO ALL DISTRICTS - This chapter is organized into
seven articles. Article A is regulations in all districts in an alphabetical listing of twenty three
subject areas from "accumulation of junk" to "utilities", Regulations formerly appearing in
the landscaping and subdivision codes have been amended and included in this section.
These include: SIDEWALKS AND PARk.'\VAYS, PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY AND SE\VER SYSTEMS,
MULTI-USE AND MICRO PATHWAYS, DITCHES, L\TER..\LS, CANALS OR DR..\IN.,\.GE COURSES;
STORM DRAINAGE; and UTILITIES. A new section, STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO DESIGN
STAND.\RDS sets forth building and site design standards for larger structures within certain
districts.
Article B. is the former Landscaping Code. This section has been re-organized and much of
the content remains the same except for those sections that now appear in other sections of
the Code.
Article C. is standards for off-street parking and loading. The most significant change in this
article is the elimination of the chart of minimum parking requirements for non-residential
uses. Parking requirements will be determined based on the specific use, location, and
4
availability of alternative transportation modes as determined by the Director.
Article D. is standards for signs. Since sign regulations have been recently amended, there
are few changes. Other than organization and fonnat, the most significant changes are for
temporary sign requirements.
Article E. is a new section on temporary uses. General standards as well as specific standards
for particular types of temporary uses are identified.
Article F. is standards for private streets. Private streets are allowed for commercial,
industrial and multi-family uses. Private streets for other residential developments are limited
to only what is needed for safety.
Article G. contains new provisions for common open space and site amenity requirements
applicable to all residential development. Minimum open space requirements are established
and additional site amenities dependent on the size of the development are specified. Street
buffers may qualify as a certain percentage of the open space requirement.
Chapter 4 SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS sets forth specific use standards for forty three of the
uses identified in the use charts. The article identifies minimum standards, as well as specifies
for some uses, the threshold when a conditional use permit is required. Of particular interest
are the standards for DRIVE THROUGH ESTABLISHMENTS; DWELLING UNIT, SECONDARY;
HOME OCCUP},TION; MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; AND VERTICALLY INTEGRi\TED
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
Chapter 5 ADMINISTRATION has three articles. Article A. is general provisions which
outline the duties and responsibilities of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission
and Director in the administration of the Code. The application, administrative, public
hearing, and city council review processes are described. Table 11-SA-1 provides a summary
of all permits or actions, which authority is responsible for the decision and the process for
the decision.
Article B. sets forth the specific requirements for certificate of zoning compliance,
development code amendments, alternative compliance, variances and conditional uses. For
each, the purpose of the permit, applicability, process, standards, and required findings are
identified. These are provisions that formerly were located in various sections throughout
Titles 11 and 12.
The alternative compliance process, first adopted as part of the landscape code, has been
expanded to other provisions where alternative methods can achieve the same or superior
level of compliance as the code requirement. Table 11-SA-1 is a summary of the
requirements that may be met through alternative compliance.
Article C. describes the purpose, applicability, and process for surety agreements.
Chapter 6 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS is contained in three articles. Article A. outlines the
purpose, applicability and authority for regulation of subdivisions.
5
Article B. describes the subdivision process. Four separate processes are included:
PRELIMINARY PLAT, FINAL PLAT, COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, AND SHORT
PLAT. A short plat is a new process applicable to commercial, industrial, TN-C, and O-T
districts under specific and limited circumstances. This article also establishes the reqtùred
findings for approval of plats, time limits for recording a final plat, and property boundary
adjustment process and standards.
Article C. sets forth the subdivision design standards for streets, driveways, easements and
blocks. A cross reference to other standards contained in Chapter 3 that apply to
subdivisions is also provided.
Chapter 7 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT establishes the applicability, process, standards,
required findings, conditions, and term of permits for planned unit developments. The
purpose reinforces the intent of PUD to be the exception to subdivisions and not to be a
tool for deviation from the standards in the district. The provisions allow that a specific
conditional or accessory use(s) not otherwise allowed in the district, be allowed as principal
permitted use(s) and that deviations from the zoning requirements for dimensional standards
are not allowed on the periphery of the district.
Zoning Amendment Findings:
According to Ordinance 11-15~ 11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the
P&Z Commission and City Council are required "to review the particular facts and
circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and
shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning
amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in Meridian City Code 11-15-11 and analysis of
the proposed Unified Development Code by staff:
A.
Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff fmds the Zoning Amendment application complies with and furthers the goals
and objectives of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. There are a number of actions called
for in the Plan which the existing Zoning Ordinance either does not allow or are made
easier to accomplish through the proposed amendment. Specific Objectives and
Actions that support the proposed amendment are listed below:
Chapter IV
. Goal I, Obj. B, #2 - Amend zoning ordinance and map to ensure wide variety of
housing types can be developed and properly zoned and land is available.
. Goal II, Obj. C, #3 - Allocate and identify locations/inventory for industrial and
commercial business parks.
6
.
Goal II, Obi. D, #8 - Develop incentives to retain the existing institutional,
conunercial and government anchors to remain in Old Town.
Goal II, Obi. D, #14 - Develop incentives to develop higher density housing
throughout the Old Town neighborhood and in dispersed developments.
.
Chapter V
. Goal II, Obi. A, #7 - Establish thematic or uniform signage.
. Goal III, Obi. B. #1 - Draft appropriate conununity design ordinances.
. Goal III, Obi. B, #5 - Use the comprehensive plan, subdivision regulations and
zoning to discourage strip development and encourage clustered, landscaped
business or residential development on entryway corridors.
. Goal III, Obi. D, #1 ~ Develop incentives for open space areas within all
development.
. Goal III, Obi. D, #6 - Adopt a new landscape ordinance. . .
. Goal III, Obi. D, #7 - Adopt a new sign ordinance. . .
Chapter VI
. Goal II, Obi. B, #9 - The City should review its current regulations for issues
that would prohibit or discourage the type of mixed-use, transit-oriented
development desired within transit overlay districts.
. Goal V, Obi. A, #2 - Develop provisions for medical services in the Zoning and
Development Ordinance.
Chapter VII
. Goal I, Obi. C, #1 - Amend the zoning ordinance and map to implement this
plan (Comprehensive Plan)
. Goal I, Obi. C, #2 - Develop standards for integrating medium-to-high density
residential into existing subdivision development.
. Goal I, Obi. E, #3 ~ Require industrial areas to create a site design compatible
with surrounding uses and community design criteria.
. Goal I, Obi. E, #6 - Separate heavy industrial and light industrial within the
Zoning Ordinance.
. Goal II, Obi. A, #5 - Amend the zoning ordinance and map to implement the
provisions of this plan.
. Goal IV, Obi. A, #5 - Require industrial development to conform to Federal
and State air, water and noise pollution standards, and local landscaping, traffic,
noise and environmental standards.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #6 - Require pedestrian access in all new development. . .
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #7 ~ Provide for non-exclusive residential zoning that allows
for low~impact neighborhood conunercial areas to develop in residential districts.
Develop standards to regulate neighborhood commercial uses to minimize the
impact on the integrity of the residential district.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #9 - Adopt land use designations which will allow for housing
opportunities for all income levels.
. Goal IV, Obi. C, #10 - Support a variety of residential categories O-ow, medium
and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments,
7
.
condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of
affordable housing opportunities.
Goal V, Obi. A, #13 - Review ordinances or other policy statements which
affect housing development and consolidated to avoid confusion and use of
conflicting policies and requirements.
Goal V, obi. C, #2 - Enact new Planned Development and subdivision
ordinances.
Goal V, Obi. C, #3 - Revise existing ordinances to include height limitation,
density, scale, floor area to green space ratio, traffic generation and landscaping.
Goal V, Obi. C, #4 - Re-evaluate residential density categories (i.e. R-8 to R-15
to R-40 is too broad of a range) in the zoning ordinance.
Goal V, Obi. C, #5 - Eliminate vague/unclear standards in development
ordinances.
.
.
.
.
Staff also finds that the proposed UDC includes three (3) new zoning districts (I-H,
TN-C and TN-R) which help to bring the ordinance into line with the land use
designations shown on the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The last two
districts have been created specifically to implement the provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan for mixed use centers and neighborhoods. We find the
application is harmonious with and in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and Generalized Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Existing
Urban".
B.
Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in
a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The City of Meridian's rapid pace of residential, commercial and office development
continued unabated since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 2002. The north and
southeast areas of the city experienced the highest amount of growth, but pockets of
west and central Meridian added fair amounts of new development as well. (See the
COMPASS Development Monitoring Report for additional growth figures.) The
amount of past and projected growth and the Comprehensive Plan Actions/Policies
listed above dictate that the City's development and subdivision codes be revamped to
better prepare Meridian for the next 10-15 years of growth.
c.
Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential
character of the same area;
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, new development
that is regulated by the UDC is anticipated to be harmonious and blended with
surrounding neighborhoods in an enhanced way - due in part to new design and
operation standards included in the new code.
8
D.
Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
See Finding "c" above.
E.
Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such
services;
Staff finds that the UDC does not propose any significant changes to how public
utilities and services are provided to new development. All City departments, public
agencies and service providers that currently review applications will continue to do so.
H anything, the level of review and comment on development applications will be
improved since the UDC requires pre-application and neighborhood meetings for
applications which require a public hearing (see Section 11-5A-5).
F.
Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community;
Not applicable.
G.
Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,
property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,
noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, the UDC does
include a number of new and more comprehensive standards that serve to regulate
potentially noxious, disturbing, hazardous or other detrimental conditions. (See
Section 11-4, Specific Use Standards).
H.
Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Not applicable.
I.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature
of major importance; and
The zoning amendment does not propose any new uses. However, the UDC does add
new language which specifies all natural waterways to remain open. It also provides
more specificity on environmental agency review and approval processes so applicants
are better informed about state and federal rules.
9
J.
Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian.
(Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the proposed amendment is clearly in the best interest of the City -
both for its residents and workforce. Many aspects of the existing code (Title 11
and 12) have remained unchanged since its adoption in 1984. Those standards may
have been adequate for the rates and types of growth experienced during the 1980's
and 1990' s, but they need to be changed. We find that the proposed streamlining of
the land development process (i.e. allowing more uses as pennitted vs. conditional
and providing staff with greater review authority) will facilitate economic
development. The addition of three new zoning districts expands the palette of
allowed uses and should contribute to a more self-sufficient community. The
proposed code incorporates planning principles and land use regulations which will
guide the City's development into the 21 st century and facilitate a higher quality of
development for our citizens.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the subject
Zoning Amendment application (Unified Development Code) to the City Council. At the
Apri118th public hearing, we intend to present a few minor modifications and edits to the
code as it was submitted to you on Apri14th. We request that any motion of approval include
those modifications. We look forward to a good dialogue with both the Commission and the
public about this application.
10
CITY OF MERIDIAN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AMENDING THE ZONING & SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of
Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridían will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City
Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho on Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00
p.m. for the purpose of reviewing and considering the applications of an
ordinance to repeal Title 11 Zoning Regulations and Title 12 Subdivision
Development of the Meridian City Code and to replace with a new Title 11
Unified Development Code.
The new ordinance embodies the official zoning ordinance of the City of
Meridian to provide for orderly growth and development and carry out the policies
of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan. The Unified Development Code will not
include the R-3 and T -E zoning classifications. Properties that currently have
these zones will be rezoned to R-2 and L-O respectively. More and all specific
changes can be reviewed by going to the City of Meridian's web site at
www.meridiancitV.on:~ and searching on the Planning and Zoning Department's
web page. You may also view and inspect the application at the City Clerk's
Office at 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho and the Planning and Zoning
Department at 660 East Watertower Lane, Meridian, Idaho during regular
business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. If you
would like to purchase a paper copy and I or disk copy, please call in advance to
the Planning and Zoning Department at 884-5533 or the City Clerk's Office at
888-4433.
Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing, and
the public is welcome and invíted to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be
limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written materials I testimony may be
submitted seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested
parties may examine them prior to the hearing. All materials presented at public
meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring
accommodatíon for disabílities related to documents and I or hearings, please
contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the p ;~ "
meeting.,~.. ". ;
Daled this 1 sl day of April. dI ~ ~ . ~~
William G. Berg, Jr. -
.',
Publish April 4th and 11 th, 2005
RADIUS NOTICE REPORT
FILE NAME: Grants
06-Apr-2005
Owners
Own e.'
.-r- ~; .~cJjl\J/tU- ç,
Ú ,,_,J--di l J I
f)Mcr'~' ð ~
jroV -- J ~ ý h'-'"
) i ,)-}
f,p~'
.-----,..------
A'A LLC
12552:
BOISE
Property Address:
S CLOVERDALE RD
BLACK DREW C
BLACK JULIE M
32311\
MERII
Property Address: 3231 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
CAMPBELL BOND G
CAMPBELL SHELL! M
3250 ]\
MERIDIAN, ill 83642.0000
Property Address: 3250 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
CAMPBELL BOND G
CAMPBELL SHELL! M
3250 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ill 83642.0000
Property Address: 3300 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
CAMPBELL CONTRACTORS INC
1150 E USTICK
MERIDIAN, ill 83642-0000
Property Address: 3357 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
DOUGAL l\1ICHAEL
DOUGAL PATTY
3265 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ill 83642.0000
Property Address: 3265 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
FREEMAN DOUGLAS M
FREEMAN SHIRLEY K
3411 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ill 8364H)OOO
Property Address: 3411 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
GILKEY F AE B
GILKEY ROBERT W
3383 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ill 83642.0000
Property Address: 3383 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DIST NO 2
911 NMERIDIANRD
MERIDIAN, ill 83642-2241
Property Address: 355 S CLOVERDALE RD
1
~ if - e/os- mJ1-
---"----,-_._._,-,,,,"
----~----'".----".,_._,------"-,
Owners
Owner Address
~.,,-~-"'~"-
MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DIST NO 2
911 NMERIDIANRD
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-2241
Property Address: 650 N NOLA RD
MINSHEW CASEY J
MINSHEW PAMELA K
3325 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address: 3325 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
PIKE SHANNON L
PIKE KELLY
3299 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address: 3299 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
PRAIRΠTRAVIS
PRAIRIE VANESSA
3332 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address: 3332 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
TUELLERLARRY KAY
TIJELLER JULIE ANN
3384 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address: 3384 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
VJ 1O!NT VENTURE
3084 E LANARK
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address:
E PINE AVE
WEBB SCOTT RAY
ALLEN-WEBB JULIE
3410 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
Property Address: 3410 N BOULDER CREEK AVE
2
Page 1 of 2
Barb Shiffer
-------,--~----~~,_.
From: Anna Canning [canninga@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 31,20055:23 PM
To: 'Tara Green'; 'Will Berg'; 'Bill Nary'
Cc: Barb Shiffer
Subject: RE: Language for Newspaper
Importance: High
I just realized I needed to include something else. Please run it by Bill before publishing:
An ordinance to repeal Title 11: Zoning Regulations and Title 12: Subdivision and Development of the Meridian
Code and to replace them with a new Title 11: Unified Development Code. The Unified Development Code
will not include the zoning classifications of R-3 and T~E. Properties that currently have these zones will be
rezoned to R.2 and L-O respectively. Copies will be available for review at: the Planning and Zoning Department
web page at ~.meridiancitv.org; the City Clerks office at 33 E. Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho; and the Planning
and Zoning Department at 660 E. Watertower Lane, Meridian, Idaho. You may call Barbara Shiffer (884-5533) in
advance to purchase a paper andlor disk copy from the Planning and Zoning Department.
Also, I will have Barb run a list of property owners in the R-3 and T-E zones. We should send them a mailed
notice. (There are not many of them.)
Anna
-"""---,--'-_",_""m,,,,- -m""""-,.__,_,m,____,,",,,,-,",'m,',","" ","m"",.m". ""'----'-- ,,----"- .-.. "","~.-m~"",~,-"_,,,,'.'m"""m"""'-""-"-,~"--------'""m"~m__"_- -~,---~
From: Anna Canning [mailto:canninga@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20055:05 PM
To: 'Tara Green'; 'Will Berg'
Cc: 'Bill Nary'
Subject: Language for Newspaper
An ordinance to repeal Title 11: Zoning Regulations and Title 12: Subdivision and Development of the Meridian
Code and to replace them with a new Title 11: Unified Development Code. Copies will be available for review at:
the Planning and Zoning Department web page at www",.meridiancitv.orq; the City Clerks office at 33 E. Idaho
Street, Meridian, Idaho; and the Planning and Zoning Department at 660 E. Watertower Lane, Meridian, Idaho.
You may call Barbara Shiffer (884-5533) in advance to purchase a paper and/or disk copies from the Planning
and Zoning Department.
Anna Borrhers Canni11f!y AICP
City if Meridian Planning Director
660 E. Watenmœr Lan;, Sui1£ 202
Meridian, ID 83642
(208) 884-5533 phone
(208) 888-6854 fa!.Simile
4/6/2005
=tj;-7I:Oi'-¡<:>\,') J=1
" /_",,;..:,..¡...L,__,,__J,-,-"~-
"(~:jtt{-I
I -- -<-~-J- L-J I E~'-:'c----,_:-,-~- I
[ -~, f I I lJ....LL [I --,--1
\ ~-- ------" L' '<,/ ,I I I
' : If i: u....LLL.., -"' È:';"
-" J[ ,- ' --- ~:;'::-:-;j:I~IID ,1TL~
-' '- ,3:: '__- f---J, I
-- ,,---. I ~ ':¡I '
m~~: -,- ,==--ç,~:~J~:r~-1
LL -[ /" />-, TTIDnÙ=1 [ l
.. =ï-~~ -----r
I
-.---,-----
,--, ' , ,
<,~--~;::~¡),--1
'", '-'---- ----',
,---', --"~,-\
'- I ,<,
í-~:=-~':~,:\
'iew-----U ú \
iIrl~
r---i~D~
i------ -,-,-----,-,- L"'~-I
-Pr----'-
¡
1--'
----,..,----,
,,-Fa .FVi e
"IDJ
/-- ------,-------- -II'
l
,---,- IIITIIJIIOIU '" ,,----- )
~:(tCCU_LlUL:':::-ì~ C-~-' ~
--,~, ::;:,,- --t'-lT/--_~- --:...1 \==~ - --- - -- --
./ ,~, D \ l------'---' ' "--"'"1' ~ \ ----- IIIIIJ]IJId IJ --- ----
-~1}7If{tII-:~:!r-¿=?~::\::<:~~ -'-, ~ " -, /
rL=)í~11,I,~~1~J~}22j-r:;::\~:::::~:~;:~\;- tllffEBBIEffiJ -
f--- ~--r-==-1ð~~tr~~~;~~;f~~F)~- --~ 01 ~\-:~ ù ,,- ~- '~ 0 =
:j rn l \...'---L, ,'", 'i /,'/ /--- (, ~ --- --, '\\/', /
- I~:-~ j hIT,]]] ~~~)<>t{lÌß> " --- -
--=- -,----" r/ 1TimJ [l1fr-?h ' 0
I~I
B
_,I
Jr' ~rl
!I -
a-ILJ_~ rITIr
-Ak ¡- [1_,- ----.J \,---~ ____l
IE m~ T¡~1 ìl Effr~Ei-~~[['.lJ)-l--. I-~ ~-¡~
r~'IIIIJ í~--- --ì~~>:)*fOlll::IJI ~l~> I:J¡Jc ~{ ClJ:!JIDT\SS;;;,~\
[j-llIIJ r~- I~rr--~~.!Uj/'l :\~ I [=~ ['-' _/ ',~=-==~~c--, . \~:(~-l~3 e[~f1-B~~~/-
~.'c" Ti e~' [[l~q I --'-- )2"-, \'<\ç:}J[]?5;::\~-4)7'~"~-'-J=
'¡ L L~_""., -'-'--' ~ (-)'; /'- --¡;-',-'í-::\(I ì}-~~
j ",,- ---' _:'-- JCJ "",,--- --------~\-:"::,:~:;:~:~tóif~~~/
~--.c~. /;::=-=---- L- ¡II' 1 i '\,,/'\:::::~-:~~cü--"<;:~~f?J~PÇ
--~---~J r--tn r--'-- : fl~j G ";:J~TJ~
-- / i--"'l" "í"'-- "1------' ----eel ...
---------1---- ¡ , c, ,C) !----'-I J"7^' ---- %!
~i --':":---c-:-_-I_____I ['j- .c_-<;J: -5--[ Æ
- (lJ""~~ ----j """" )11 -:: - -- ;-------- - --I['-~18;'- ;:l[ J lJilL-- ----0
---~--;;:-;///' ,/ :_--~-- I] /L!:_;~~Y~-\-~"""~I~l\-~~~~"
-'--"-l // - 1------ /i~---(r--¡".-----\\/",:.-\-rn -- .----J
/ ø i ~".,,~ R ßjl~ijr--~1OJJffi~
-- ----l--------------,-_. T----¡----l~\ I i ,"----::~"/I,-_jl----LTI(L--\<JL_~i_!T' L//
-- i;~~------- I r-"':',,)..L1J__< --< 1 f---~ I --1 1- TTTTT-I I
-.--"'..
,,------------,---
//'-.----T"-------------------
I
I
I 1JT]'
------{IJrJ]J~w~7)
J, CLU_L-~~l j, ~-:L.JL
/"'/---~-'¡\D7~
"'- ;- \,- ' 1 \ _c---'--~--~--(l i
=3 (:jIf=-:~~L[;~:2i
=:~JJJ_~=-\_-:...L!::L-LU I
'-'-==--, ---(/ j--[-¡--j--\-lJ IZ-h--::'
Þ-3' -"'----- "~~<CrrrID~~;:;\
..- " -,-'-íll(¡-",,>
, I \ " , ~ c, "v
" ---- '~(TIn~(~
/ -'TrTTn (In-\'\(
-- . I" ,_lill.J LLLl_.."
-~--I-----J lJIII[[l- ¡- ]DID ~ ~-
- 'L.1 _L- 1_- -- ,L1J___[",",-_J dJIDI- - -- .nII~ r J\
¡ J I L Ilirn- 1 /
" -,-- /- - ( / \ '\
' "I-,
.. '" -1.- -- ,---OJ - -~--- ----'--~ ':=
" .. ..- -----,----- Ff¡ nk: "ì-mr;- -" - ,-, -" -----, l---J---~~::::--'---"l 0 --IJi --,æ~~
I ~--""'-I l 1=C1 [[II[[ I I I I' " L [ --
--, , WillJ I - --, TI"" -- - " /" ~ - ""
- T\ ---,--L B'"' - ~---
-,..',,_~I .,~-::".- [ --.L\ -'- /' - -~_L\-ßI';4~rt~ --IT -
'iliEJ-"" -' ,/' (II , Tn lL!___Jtu -- --,,---
t- . n= \IDf9~ç::-- \3+~ - , L ~-- - --.
L I J]] -- fT'I-::J i--I'L~\---\d-1\~CIIIJ ","- r ~~y
---==-:::.._"."~-~-~ t:~J ~1 ';~\ I;~::-j ~~I \=~\ ~-l)=r:rp:J,~- - ,~, ---=--- --~---'- I~ I
1';--'"('1"1'11/;0-, ¡-j I-¡-\ I_" c,;\;-'" JTC.LL,."". ~___~'/ ----,-------=::-:- '--------=
- ---- ..:::i..L_u :L.IJu '1~._\,~.o~~-",J1 ,->----->\.- ~ - -, ;'-" ;' / / "--I --------
("::TIDln-~--\-!-]li\TJ._L/->-",-;,y/>«:Hl / ,. -~ '/ I ,._Lj- I I
"' --- 'g(.'-'~-f--i~~::.II\ n-:-;.~~~--~.}(~-<::::;'<s<~ = ' ~) -. I J-L- Ii ,,-
f-.JIII-II--,uI,l_-li--",I-"/,--,-'»v,-,,j 1/-'----/' --¡I
-H -- n -!II- Tì\'---' 1---' ,- /, V /" ',", - II --. I ,
~ c-\ In I ,j\,-", - --\,'v' "-"'- "'/ÄJ ('/r- ------, ! ,:
=-,~,~~\::-~'---'-ur~, -"'.- <~~«<>"-:_-" - -'::;-~::---==: L~~ -~- --. - ~-----
~ "]'-' 11ll' I \]j'-'" '-,,- ~ ',-" -".lc_,-",---------- "--I " ,J II --_.--"---
--.;¡. '-~LrLTTI_-ì'----- -'-'I-~----D ! D -,,/- - --,------
- \ ~n.'- I 1 "-- -",--< .\. I {" ,_/ - -----
",- <,-~~~,___~!I~~::-¡ --¡ - -l--{~T-~T~-::~~~'i[;~-- ~' \-~---~~=J//// //~-----------
~ïcL II uJF~ \~--/ /
\ Ft]i==-- - /¿~~\ ~~ / \: /
I Ii '- --,:-------- - I, ',----_/ 1 -------::1, I--i.- '-------]-~-"\'-\T
I n____,,[- L--- ------"--- I "-, ,
I , -..._---- ----.- -- -- -,,_. -'r------I-- I' \
----_.-- ------- ,--------'--- --------------------;----- i:----:-------:::---- '-".)~"':::::::;:
: ¡-----.- -- --!-- 1_,- " " ,
-----
, -------
,,_____n I