Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 5, 2005 P&Z Minutes Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 5 of 32 Item 6: Item 7: Item 8: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: AZ 05-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 43.18 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: PP 05-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 166 building lots and 37 common lots on 43.18 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17,2005: CUP 05-008 Request for a Planned Development consisting of 166 residential units with reductions to the minimum requirements for lot size, street frontage and yard setbacks for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: And with that I will open public hearings for AZ 05-007, PP 05-009, and CUP 05-008 and mention again that we have a request to continue these to May 19th and I'm suggesting that we, actually, continue them to June 2nd. Guenther: Chairman Zaremba? Zaremba: Yes. Guenther: I'd like to make note to this file that Bellingham Park is one of the items that we have anticipated hearing on the 19th, which has made that hearing more full than it normally would be. We also have been discussing this matter with the applicant and we believe that tailing it out even further is just going to drag it out even farther. This will, on the May 19th hearing, have been exactly three months from the first original scheduling of this item and staff would like to definitely hear this on the 19th. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Zaremba: Commissioner Moe. Moe: Reading through this a few times, I'm kind of curious. What has changed? Guenther: Everything. Moe: Okay. Are they doing the micro-path? Guenther: They have submitted a proposal last Friday in order to give their best estimate of where the micro-path should lie. It does not follow staff's recommendation. And at this -- I think that this is something that we should have an applicant present "."-' Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 5 of 32 Item 6: Item 7: Item 8: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: AZ 05-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 43.18 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: PP 05-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 166 building lots and 37 common lots on 43.18 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: CUP 05-008 Request for a Planned Development consisting of 166 residential units with reductions to the minimum requirements for lot size, street frontage and yard setbacks for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: And with that I will open public hearings for AZ 05-007, PP 05-009, and CUP 05-008 and mention again that we have a request to continue these to May 19th and I'm suggesting that we, actually, continue them to June 2nd. Guenther: Chairman Zaremba? Zaremba: Yes. Guenther: I'd like to make note to this file that Bellingham Park is one of the items that we have anticipated hearing on the 19th, which has made that hearing more full than it normally would be. We also have been discussing this matter with the applicant and we believe that tailing it out even further is just going to drag it out even farther. This will, on the May 19th hearing, have been exactly three months from the first original scheduling of this item and staff would like to definitely hear this on the 19th. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Zaremba: Commissioner Moe. Moe: Reading through this a few times, I'm kind of curious. What has changed? Guenther: Everything. Moe: Okay. Are they doing the micro-path? Guenther: They have submitted a proposal last Friday in order to give their best estimate of where the micro-path should lie. It does not follow staff's recommendation. And at this -- I think that this is something that we should have an applicant present ----- """" Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 5 of 32 Item 6: Item 7: Item 8: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: AZ 05-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 43.18 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: PP 05-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 166 building lots and 37 common lots on 43.18 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 2005: CUP 05-008 Request for a Planned Development consisting of 166 residential units with reductions to the minimum requirements for lot size, street frontage and yard setbacks for Bellingham Park Subdivision by Gemstar Development, LLC - north of Amity Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: And with that I will open public hearings for AZ 05-007, PP 05-009, and CUP 05-008 and mention again that we have a request to continue these to May 19th and I'm suggesting that we, actually, continue them to June 2nd. Guenther: Chairman Zaremba? Zaremba: Yes. Guenther: I'd like to make note to this file that Bellingham Park is one of the items that we have anticipated hearing on the 19th, which has made that hearing more full than it normally would be. We also have been discussing this matter with the applicant and we believe that tailing it out even further is just going to drag it out even farther. This will, on the May 19th hearing, have been exactly three months from the first original scheduling of this item and staff would like to definitely hear this on the 19th. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Zaremba: Commissioner Moe. Moe: Reading through this a few times, I'm kind of curious. What has changed? Guenther: Everything. Moe: Okay. Are they doing the micro-path? Guenther: They have submitted a proposal last Friday in order to give their best estimate of where the micro-path should lie. It does not follow staff's recommendation. And at this -- I think that this is something that we should have an applicant present Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 6 of 32 before we actually hear anymore. I have not had the opportunity to make a full review of the file at this time and alii know that there is just outstanding issues that still need to be addressed. I anticipate getting you the complete staff report as soon as possible. Moe: And so you're confident that those issues can be taken care of for the hearing for the 19th? Guenther: Well, the applicant's main issues were the staff conditions of approval, which have partially been addressed, which I have to go through and redo conditions of approval, and so I'm not sure if they will be addressed before the 19th or not. I guess that's -- Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Zaremba: Excuse me one second. Technically, they would have to all be addressed, really, by the 9th, so that you have ten days to prepare everything, so -- Guenther: That is correct. Zaremba: Are you anticipating that you will have everything you need to have? Guenther: I don't know. We have made several requests to the applicant for information and I have received partial information to the file. Zaremba: I have 19 items already listed for May 19th and those are not among them. Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: That was my question is how many items and what are the nature for the meeting on the 19th. And, then, my second question is if they are not ready, are you going to -- are we going to continue it again? Rohm: I kind of think -- Guenther: At this point it's to the -- it's almost to the point where on the 19th I am preparing to either make findings for approval with the conditions as stated by staff in order to -- our best estimate of what it's going to take in order to give this site an approval and I'm toying with the idea of bringing in recommendation for denial and findings for the same and letting this board choose as -- at your direction. But it's all going to depend on if I get more information before the 9th or not. So, I guess I don't have a really good -- the longer you table it out, the more they are going to trickle information in is what I guess I can say. Zaremba: I know you're trying to move it along. My suggestion would be for us to continue it to the 2nd and with the comment to you that if you don't have all the materials ten days before that, you only prepare recommendation for denial. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 6 of 32 before we actually hear anymore. I have not had the opportunity to make a full review of the file at this time and alii know that there is just outstanding issues that still need to be addressed. I anticipate getting you the complete staff report as soon as possible. Moe: And so you're confident that those issues can be taken care of for the hearing for the 19th? Guenther: Well, the applicant's main issues were the staff conditions of approval, which have partially been addressed, which I have to go through and redo conditions of approval, and so I'm not sure if they will be addressed before the 19th or not. I guess that's -- Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Zaremba: Excuse me one second. Technically, they would have to all be addressed, really, by the 9th, so that you have ten days to prepare everything, so -- Guenther: That is correct. Zaremba: Are you anticipating that you will have everything you need to have? Guenther: I don't know. We have made several requests to the applicant for information and I have received partial information to the file. Zaremba: I have 19 items already listed for May 19th and those are not among them. Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: That was my question is how many items and what are the nature for the meeting on the 19th. And, then, my second question is if they are not ready, are you going to -- are we going to continue it again? Rohm: I kind of think -- Guenther: At this point it's to the -- it's almost to the point where on the 19th I am preparing to either make findings for approval with the conditions as stated by staff in order to -- our best estimate of what it's going to take in order to give this site an approval and I'm toying with the idea of bringing in recommendation for denial and findings for the same and letting this board choose as -- at your direction. But it's all going to depend on if I get more information before the 9th or not. So, I guess I don't have a really good -- the longer you table it out, the more they are going to trickle information in is what I guess I can say. Zaremba: I know you're trying to move it along. My suggestion would be for us to continue it to the 2nd and with the comment to you that if you don't have all the materials ten days before that, you only prepare recommendation for denial. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 6 of 32 before we actually hear anymore. I have not had the opportunity to make a full review of the file at this time and alii know that there is just outstanding issues that still need to be addressed. I anticipate getting you the complete staff report as soon as possible. Moe: And so you're confident that those issues can be taken care of for the hearing for the 19th? Guenther: Well, the applicant's main issues were the staff conditions of approval, which have partially been addressed, which I have to go through and redo conditions of approval, and so I'm not sure if they will be addressed before the 19th or not. I guess that's -- Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Zaremba: Excuse me one second. Technically, they would have to all be addressed, really, by the 9th, so that you have ten days to prepare everything, so -- Guenther: That is correct. Zaremba: Are you anticipating that you will have everything you need to have? Guenther: I don't know. We have made several requests to the applicant for information and I have received partial information to the file. Zaremba: I have 19 items already listed for May 19th and those are not among them. Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: That was my question is how many items and what are the nature for the meeting on the 19th. And, then, my second question is if they are not ready, are you going to -- are we going to continue it again? Rohm: I kind of think -- Guenther: At this point it's to the -- it's almost to the point where on the 19th I am preparing to either make findings for approval with the conditions as stated by staff in order to -- our best estimate of what it's going to take in order to give this site an approval and I'm toying with the idea of bringing in recommendation for denial and findings for the same and letting this board choose as -- at your direction. But it's all going to depend on if I get more information before the 9th or not. So, I guess I don't have a really good -- the longer you table it out, the more they are going to trickle information in is what I guess I can say. Zaremba: I know you're trying to move it along. My suggestion would be for us to continue it to the 2nd and with the comment to you that if you don't have all the materials ten days before that, you only prepare recommendation for denial. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 7 of 32 Guenther: We can do that, too. Moe: I would agree with that. Newton-Huckabay: I think that's fair. Zaremba: Do we have a consensus among Commissioners, that being the suggestion? Rohm: It works for me. Moe: Yes. Rohm: My personal feeling is whatever information he has as of that date prior to, he make his recommendation one way or the other. It doesn't -- it doesn't have to be an address of each and every issue, just where ever staff falls at the end of the disclosures, you make your recommendation based on that and, then, we will act on it, but to conclude, I think that it's safe to say that we are not going to continue this indefinitely and if, in fact, all conditions aren't addressed, more than likely we will move to deny. And that being said, I think we should continue it to the 2nd of June and we will give them that time and if it's not done, then, at that time we will conclude with a recommendation. Newton-Huckabay: Is that a motion? Moe: Is that a motion? Rohm: That's a motion. Zaremba: Is there a second? Moe: Second. Zaremba: Okay. It's moved and seconded to continue this until June 2nd, these three items. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Public Hearing: CUP 05-017 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct 7 office buildings in a previously approved Planned Unit Development of Lot 6, Block 1 of Resolution Subdivision No.1 for Sagecrest Subdivision by Larry Sundell - south of East Overland Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: Next on the agenda, Item 9. I will open the Public Hearing for CUP 05-017, request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct seven office buildings in a previously approved planned unit development of Lot 6, Block 1, of Resolution Subdivision No.1 Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 7 of 32 Guenther: We can do that, too. Moe: I would agree with that. Newton-Huckabay: I think that's fair. Zaremba: Do we have a consensus among Commissioners, that being the suggestion? Rohm: It works for me. Moe: Yes. Rohm: My personal feeling is whatever information he has as of that date prior to, he make his recommendation one way or the other. It doesn't -- it doesn't have to be an address of each and every issue, just where ever staff falls at the end of the disclosures, you make your recommendation based on that and, then, we will act on it, but to conclude, I think that it's safe to say that we are not going to continue this indefinitely and if, in fact, all conditions aren't addressed, more than likely we will move to deny. And that being said, I think we should continue it to the 2nd of June and we will give them that time and if it's not done, then, at that time we will conclude with a recommendation. Newton-Huckabay: Is that a motion? Moe: Is that a motion? Rohm: That's a motion. Zaremba: Is there a second? Moe: Second. Zaremba: Okay. It's moved and seconded to continue this until June 2nd, these three items. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Public Hearing: CUP 05-017 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct 7 office buildings in a previously approved Planned Unit Development of Lot 6, Block 1 of Resolution Subdivision No.1 for Sagecrest Subdivision by Larry Sundell - south of East Overland Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: Next on the agenda, Item 9. I will open the Public Hearing for CUP 05-017, request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct seven office buildings in a previously approved planned unit development of Lot 6, Block 1 of Resolution Subdivision No.1 Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 7 of 32 Guenther: We can do that, too. Moe: I would agree with that. Newton-Huckabay: I think that's fair. Zaremba: Do we have a consensus among Commissioners, that being the suggestion? Rohm: It works for me. Moe: Yes. Rohm: My personal feeling is whatever information he has as of that date prior to, he make his recommendation one way or the other. It doesn't -- it doesn't have to be an address of each and every issue, just where ever staff falls at the end of the disclosures, you make your recommendation based on that and, then, we will act on it, but to conclude, I think that it's safe to say that we are not going to continue this indefinitely and if, in fact, all conditions aren't addressed, more than likely we will move to deny. And that being said, I think we should continue it to the 2nd of June and we will give them that time and if it's not done, then, at that time we will conclude with a recommendation. Newton-Huckabay: Is that a motion? Moe: Is that a motion? Rohm: That's a motion. Zaremba: Is there a second? Moe: Second. Zaremba: Okay. It's moved and seconded to continue this until June 2nd, these three items. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Public Hearing: CUP 05-017 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct 7 office buildings in a previously approved Planned Unit Development of Lot 6, Block 1 of Resolution Subdivision No.1 for Sagecrest Subdivision by Larry Sundell - south of East Overland Road and east of South Locust Grove Road: Zaremba: Next on the agenda, Item 9. I will open the Public Hearing for CUP 05-017, request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct seven office buildings in a previously approved planned unit development of Lot 6, Block 1, of Resolution Subdivision No.1