HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-11-26 Clarke Wardle Development Attorneys follow-up to hearing testimony (FLUM & Comp Plan requests), final (11-26-2019)
Joshua J. Leonard
208.388.1000
JLeonard@ClarkWardle.com
Sent via Email to: cityclerk@meridiancity.org
November 26, 2019
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Meridian City Council ‐ Joe Borton, President; Luke Cavener, Vice President; Anne Little Roberts; Ty
Palmer; Treg Bernt; Genesis Milam
c/o Meridian City Clerk
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Modifications to draft Future Land Use Map & Comprehensive Plan –
NE Corner of McMillan Road and Locust Grove Road
CW File No. 23597.20
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
This letter follows up on the testimony I presented during last week’s public hearing on the proposed
draft changes to the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map. Toward the end of my
testimony, I was asked which parcels we wanted redesignated as Commercial. Below, shown in orange,
are the four parcels that we ask be redesignated as Commercial:
November 7, 2019
Re: Modifications to draft Future Land Use Map & Comprehensive
Plan – NE Corner of McMillan Road and Locust Grove Road
Page 2 of 2
These four parcels are identified by the Ada County Assessor as parcel numbers R9525350100,
R9525350200, R9525350350, and S0529336230.
I was also asked about the size of the area depicted in orange, but I did not have the answer readily
available. The area in orange is approximately 7 acres. As you know, there is a Maverik on the parcel
closest to the intersection, and multi‐tenant retail space is under construction on the smaller square‐
shaped parcel. The vaguely Z‐shaped parcel that runs through the site is nearly entirely covered with
easements for utilities, cross‐access, and parking, leaving only the northernmost parcel, which consists
of 3.4 acres, to be developed.
At the October public hearing held by the Planning and Zoning Commission, City staff reiterated its belief
that our client could develop this property simply by submitting an application to amend the existing
development agreement. Our client happily would submit a development application for this site, but
any development application would encounter a circular problem: Unless the current Mixed Use
Neighborhood use designation on this site is changed to Commercial, any requested development
agreement amendment or zoning change for this site will fail, because any such change must be “in
accord with” or “comply with” or be “in conformance with” the Comprehensive Plan’s Mixed Use
Neighborhood designation for this site. (See Meridian City Code Sections 11‐1‐2, 11‐5B‐2, 11‐5B‐3(E),
and 11‐6B‐6, respectively.) As I testified at last week’s public hearing, the developable land at this site is
insufficient to accommodate the range of uses required for property designated Mixed Use
Neighborhood. No development agreement amendment or zoning change can meet the “in accord
with,” “comply with,” or “in conformance with” requirements so long as the use designation remains
Mixed Use Neighborhood. The use designation first must be changed to Commercial, or our client will
remain stuck in this circular problem, without a viable path forward for development at this site.
We strongly urge the City to re‐evaluate the future land use designation for this site, and to re‐designate
it as Commercial.
Sincerely,
Joshua J. Leonard
Cc: Tommy Ahlquist
Cortney Liddiard
Tonn Peterson
Geoff Wardle
Brian McClure (via email to: bmcclure@meridiancity.org)
Caleb Hood (via email to: chood@meridiancity.org)