Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 5, 2005 P&Z Minutes Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5, 2005 Page 2 of 32 Zaremba: Okay. I, actually, have one. Admittedly, I was not here that night, but in reading through them, on page 23, motion was taken on a vote regarding AZ 05-008 and the results are stated as being four ayes. Actually, Commissioner Moe had recused himself from the subject and I wasn't here, so the vote, actually, I would assume, should have been three ayes, one recused, and one absent. That's page 23. I have no other comment. Rohm: Okay. Mr. Chairman? Zaremba: Commissioner Rohm. Rohm: I move that we approve the minutes as amended. End of motion. Borup: Second. Zaremba: We have a motion and a second and let the record show, please, that Commissioner Borup has joined us. We are all here. We have a motion and a second. Those in favor may signify by saying aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 4: Recommendation: VAC 05-004 Request for a Vacation of platted easements for Krispy Kreme Subdivision by Eagle-Fairview Investment Co., LLC - Lot 1 of the Krispy Kreme Subdivision: Zaremba: Okay. The next item on the agenda is a recommendation. That, actually, is not a Public Hearing, and we will discuss it, but we will not take comment from the general public. This is a recommendation to the City Council on VAC 05-004, request for a vacation of platted easements for Krispy Kreme Subdivision by Eagle-Fairview Investment Company, LLC, Lot 1 of the Krispy Kreme Subdivision. And we will begin with the staff report. Wilson: Thank you, Chairman Zaremba, Members of the Commission. The vacation before you is Krispy Kreme Subdivision at the southwest corner of Eagle and Fairview and zoned light industrial. The applicant has requested vacation of utility easements along the former boundary that would have been between Lots 1 and 3, as indicated by the dashed line there, and also along the former boundary of Lots 3 and 4. We do have notarized consent on file from all parties, all beneficiaries of the easements and other than that I don't have any staff comments. Zaremba: Okay. We have reviewed the packets. I can't remember on recommendations whether the applicant making remarks is in order or not. I believe we -- the applicant's made their case already and staff has presented it. Nary: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, I mean unless he has anything else to add, yeah, you certainly can take action or make a recommendation based on that. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 5. 2005 Page 3 of 32 Zaremba: Okay. Is the applicant here and care to say anything? Apparently not. Okay. Commissioners? Moe: Mr. Chairman? Zaremba: Commissioner Moe. Moe: I move we forward to City Council approving VAC 05-004, with all staff comments of the hearing date of May 5th, 2005, received by the city clerk's office May 2nd, 2005. Rohm: Second. Zaremba: There is a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Anyopposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Recommendation: VAC 05-005 Request for a Vacation of a portion of a 20-foot utility easement between Lots 20 & 21, Block 1, Stokesberry Subdivision No.2 by Properties West, Inc. - west of North Eagle Road and north of River Valley Street: Zaremba: Next is another recommendation. This is VAC 05-005, request for a vacation of a portion of a 20-foot utility easement that's between Lots 20 and 21, Block 1, of Stokesberry Subdivision No.2 by Properties West, Inc., west of North Eagle Road and north of River Valley Street and, again, this is not a Public Hearing, but we will begin with staff comments. Wilson: Thank you, Chairman Zaremba, Members of the Commission. The subject vacation is in Stokesberry Subdivision No.2 and is zoned light office, located generally on the west side of Eagle Road south of Ustick. The subject vacation is between Lots 20 and 21. The face of the plat did identify easements of -- they are ten feet on each side of the lot line, utility easements, and also an irrigation easement to benefit the business owners association. On this vacation we do have consent -- notarized consent on record from all beneficiaries of the easements, except for the business owners association and staff did include the condition in the report that notarized consent of relinquishment of that easement should be received before the City Council hearing. I do believe we have a slide here of the exact portion of the easement that is being vacated. That would be the shaded area there between Lots 20 and 21. And with that I'll end staff's comments. Zaremba: Okay. Any questions? Commissioners? Newton-Huckabay: I have none.